UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM Form 10-K

 

ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

For the fiscal year-ended year ended December 31 2017 , 2021

OR

 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to ________

Commission file number 000-30234number: 001-36492

 AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

ENERJEX RESOURCES, INC.Nevada88-0422242
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada88-0422242
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
4040 Broadway8863 E. 34th Street North, Wichita, Kansas67226
Suite 425��
San Antonio, Texas78209
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(210) 451-5545
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (620)325-6363

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Title of each classEach Class

Trading Symbol(s)Name of each exchangeEach Exchange on which registered

Which Registered
Common Stock, $0.001 par value $0.001 per shareNew York Stock ExchangeUAVSNYSE American LLC

10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No

☐   Yes           ☒   No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No

 

☐   Yes           ☒   No

 

Indicate by checkmarkcheck mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

☒   Yes           ☐   No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yes ☒ No ☐

☒    Yes           ☐   No

Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge , in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of large“large accelerated filer,accelerated“accelerated filer,“emerging growth company” and smaller“smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth companycompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer  ☐ ☒Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accountingaccounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.   Yes           ☒   No

State theThe aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: approximately $2.0 million.quarter was $386,867,106.

As of April 12, 2022, there were 81,568,546 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, issued and outstanding.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 23,589,790 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding on March 15, 2018.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

NONE.

ENERJEX RESOURCES, INC. 

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART IPage4
PART IITEM 1.BUSINESS54
ITEM 1BUSINESS5
ITEM 2PROPERTIES32
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS17
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS3226
ITEM 2.PROPERTIES26
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS3227
ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSUREDISCLOSURES3227
PART II3328
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES3328
ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA[RESERVED]3429
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS3429
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK4136
ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA4137
ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE4137
ITEM 9A9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES4137
ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION4238
PART IIIITEM 9C.DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS4338
PART III39
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE4339
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION4339
ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS4339
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE4339
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES4339
PART IV4440
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTSTATEMENTS, SCHEDULES40
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS44F-1

 


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

PART I

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The statements contained in this document that are not purely historical arereport may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statementsPrivate Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Investors are statements regarding future events, our future financial performance, and include statements regarding projected operating results. Thesecautioned that such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations,our management’s beliefs intentions, strategies, forecasts and assumptions and on information currently available to our management and involve a number of risks and uncertaintiesuncertainties. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our plans, strategies, objectives, expectations and intentions, which are subject to change at any time at our discretion. Forward-looking statements include our assessment, from time to time of our competitive position, the industry environment, potential growth opportunities, the effects of regulation and events outside of our control, such as natural disasters, wars or health epidemics. Forward-looking statements include all statements that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipatedare not historical facts and can be identified by these forward-looking statements. We have attempted to identify forward-looking statements by terminology includingterms such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “hopes,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts”“predicts,” “projects,” “should,” “will,” “would” or “should” or the negative of these terms orsimilar expressions.

Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other comparable terminology. Although we do not make forward-looking statements unless we believe we have a reasonable basis for doing so, we cannot guarantee their accuracy. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all risk factors nor can we address the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differbe materially different from those contained in any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. AllWe discuss many of these risks in greater detail in “Risk Factors.” Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also, forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us onrepresent our management’s beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K,report. You should read this report and the documents that we reference in this report and have filed as exhibits to the report completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update any suchthese forward-looking statements except as may otherwise be required by law.

Ourpublicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.

ITEM 1.BUSINESS

 Overview

AgEagle™ Aerial Systems Inc. (“AgEagle” or the “Company”), through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, is actively engaged in designing and delivering best-in-class drones, sensors and software that solve important problems for our customers. Founded in 2010, AgEagle was originally formed to pioneer proprietary, professional-grade, fixed-winged drones and aerial imagery-based data collection and analytics solutions for the agriculture industry. Today, the Company is earning distinction as a resultglobally respected industry leader offering best-in-class, autonomous unmanned aerial systems (“UAS”) to a wide range of certain factors,industry verticals, including those set forthenergy/utilities, infrastructure, agriculture and government, among others.

The Company’s shift and expansion from solely manufacturing fixed-wing farm drones in 2018, to offering what the Company believes is one of the industry’s best fixed-wing, full-stack drone solutions, culminated in 2021 when AgEagle acquired three market-leading companies engaged in producing UAS airframes, sensors and software for commercial and government use. In addition to a robust portfolio of proprietary, connected hardware and software products; an established global network of nearly 200 UAS resellers; and enterprise customers worldwide; these acquisitions also brought AgEagle a highly valuable workforce comprised largely of experienced engineers and technologists with deep expertise in the “Risk Factors” sectionfields of robotics, automation, manufacturing and data science.

AgEagle is led by a proven management team with years of drone industry experience. AgEagle's CEO has been appointed to the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration's ("FAA") Advanced Aviation Advisory Committee and Unmanned Aircraft Systems Beyond Visual Line of Sight Aviation Rulemaking Committee. In addition, the Company is participating in Part I, Item 1Athe FAA's BEYOND program, AgEagle has played a hands-on role in helping to establish necessary rulemaking guidelines and regulations for the future of autonomous flight and the full integration of drones into the U.S. airspace.

The Company is headquartered in Wichita, Kansas, where it also houses its U.S. manufacturing operations. In addition, AgEagle has business operations in Austin, Texas; Lausanne, Switzerland; Raleigh, North Carolina; Seattle, Washington; and Washington, D.C.


Strategic Acquisitions

MicaSense, Inc.

In January 2021, AgEagle acquired MicaSense™, Inc. (“MicaSense”), based in Seattle, Washington. MicaSense has been at the forefront of advanced drone sensor development since its founding in 2014, having formed integration partnerships with several leading fixed-wing and multi-rotor drone manufacturers. MicaSense’s patented, high precision thermal and multispectral sensors serve the aerial mapping and analytics needs of the agriculture market. MicaSense’s high performance proprietary products, including Altum-PTRedEdge-PRedEdge-MX™ and Atlas Flight, have global distribution in over 75 countries and help growers, land managers and researchers use drone-based imagery to make informed business decisions. More than 100 research publications have featured MicaSense sensor data.

Measure Global, Inc.

In April 2021, AgEagle acquired Measure Global, Inc. (“Measure”), a company founded in 2020 with business operations in Washington, D.C. and Austin, Texas. Serving a world class customer base, Measure enables its customers to realize the transformative benefits of drone technology through its Ground Control solution. Offered as Software-as-a-Service (“SaaS”), Ground Control is a cloud-based, plug-and-play operating system that empowers pilots and large enterprises with everything they need to operate drone fleets, fly autonomously, collaborate globally, visualize data, and integrate with existing business systems and processes. Ground Control serves a world class customer base, including Marathon Pipeline, Los Angeles Police Department, Nationwide Insurance, Rayonier, SECO Energy, Skanska and Syngenta, as well as many other Fortune 500 companies.

As commercial and industrial businesses continue to recover from the impact of the global pandemic, and the use of drones across a wide variety of industries and applications gain greater acceptance, AgEagle believes companies will seek trusted and robust partners capable of providing a one-stop shop for high quality drone solutions that effectively address business challenges. By adding Measure’s advanced software to the AgEagle platform, combined with our sensors and other data capture and analytics innovations, our customers can capitalize on the significant economic, safety and efficiency benefits made possible by drones used at scale.

senseFly, S.A.

In October 2021, the Company acquired senseFly, S.A. and senseFly Inc. (collectively “senseFly”) a global leader in fixed-wing drones that simplify the collection and analysis of geospatial data, allowing professionals to make better and faster decisions. Founded in 2009, senseFly develops and produces a proprietary line of eBee-branded, high performance, fixed-wing drones which have flown more than one million flights around the world. Safe, ultra-light and easy to use, these autonomous drones are utilized by thousands of customers around the world in agriculture, government, engineering, and construction, among other industry verticals, to collect actionable aerial data intelligence. With operations in Lausanne, Switzerland and Raleigh, North Carolina, senseFly’s line of eBee-branded drones have earned distinction as the best-selling commercial fixed-wing drones in the United States over the past three consecutive years, according to data supplied by the FAA; and Flyability has ranked senseFly’s eBee as the top commercial drone in the market for mapping and surveying applications.

In March 2021, the Defense Innovation Unit (“DIU”) sought proposals from UAS vendors and in the brief period the Request for Prototype Proposals was listed on its website, www.sam.gov, DIU received more than 100 responses. From this group, senseFly, along with ten other companies, were selected to participate in the 2.0 program to prototype a new approval process, significantly increasing the variety of UAS capabilities available to all branches of the U.S. military. In October 2021, senseFly was named to the Blue sUAS 2.0 list, published by the U.S. Department of Defense’s (“DoD”) Defense Innovation Unit :(DIU”). The 2.0 project was subsequently created to increase the diversity, capability and affordability of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) on DIU’s “Blue UAS Cleared List,” bringing a greater variety of drones with a wide range of modalities, capabilities and price points. A secondary part of the project involves: 1) an effort to define a common standard across the DoD for UAS vendor onboarding; 2) the means to communicate that standard; and 3) a uniform process to assist authorized vendors in the procurement process.

Subsequent to the end of 2021, senseFly completed DIU’s required testing, evaluation and demonstration process. As a result, the NDAA-compliant eBee TAC™Unmanned Aerial System was the first approved drone to be added to DIU’s Blue Cleared List as part of the Blue sUAS 2.0 project. Systems added to this list do not require a DoD exception to policy to procure or operate, as they have undergone a cyber-security evaluation, a policy compliance check and were issued the necessary administrative documentation.


Designed specifically for government and military mapping and mission planning applications, the eBee TAC operates in disconnected environments, providing a higher accuracy mobile solution to map and locally share aerial imagery data on rapidly changing field conditions to analyze and provide near real-time situational awareness to ground forces. Weighing only 3.5 pounds and featuring a digital camouflage skin for increased stealth and up to 90 minutes flight time and silent mission mode, the eBee TAC can be rapidly deployed, from assembly to hand-launch, in three minutes by a single user to generate 3D modeling, terrain and thermal maps. eBee TAC is available for purchase on the GSA Schedule Contract #47QTCA18D003G as a standalone solution or as part of the Aerial Reconnaissance Tactical Edge Mapping Imagery System (“ARTEMIS”) supplied by Hexagon US Federal and partner Tough Stump Technologies, which also provide extensive training programs for the system.

Our Branded Line of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

eBee Line of Professional Drones

When AgEagle acquired senseFly in October 2021, the Company gained a diverse portfolio of proprietary fixed-wing drones, which include:

eBee Ag a reliable, affordable drone solution to help farmers, agronomists and service providers map and monitor crops quickly and easily. The eBee Ag and its drone sensor deliver timely plant health insights with accuracy and efficiency that complements precision agriculture workflows. With its dual-purpose Duet M camera, eBee Ag captures accurate RGB and multispectral data from the sky to help users make better decisions on the ground. eBee Ag also features available Real-Time Kinematic (“RTK”) functionality for greater mapping precision. With its available RTK, the agriculture drone can achieve absolute accuracy down to 2.5 cm (1.0 inch) with its RGB camera. Highly-accurate vegetative index maps allow users to understand every acre while managing problematic areas field-wide – before they impact profits. Equipped with its standard battery, eBee Ag is capable of up to 45-minutes of flight. An available endurance battery increases flight times up to 55 minutes — allowing the drone to cover more than 160 hectares (395 acres) in a single flight and save precious time and money when compared with conventional crop scouting.

eBee Geo an affordable fixed-wing mapping drone designed to meet the highest demands of surveyors, civil engineers and GIS professionals worldwide. Built upon more than 10 years of drone mapping experience, eBee Geo is rugged, intuitive to operate and makes surveying and mapping small to large areas faster and more efficient than using terrestrial surveying equipment alone. The data collected can quickly be processed into highly-accurate georeferenced orthomosaics, digital elevation models, digital surface models and high-density point clouds to bring additional value beyond common vectors. Designed to complement the user’s surveying toolkit, eBee Geo comes with everything needed to get started, including professional drone camera technology and eMotion, AgEagle’s flight planning software originally designed and developed by senseFly. With eBee Geo, a user can map up to 160 ha (395 ac) at 120 m (400 ft) with a maximum flight time of 45 minutes. eBee Geo is also available with RTK positioning. Combined with the Company’s purpose-built Sensor Optimized for Drone Applications (“S.O.D.A”.), users are assured of sharp, accurate mapping outputs – even in the harshest conditions.

eBee TACDesigned specifically for government and military mapping and mission planning applications, the eBee TAC operates in disconnected environments, providing a higher accuracy mobile solution to map and locally share aerial imagery data on rapidly changing field conditions to analyze and provide near real-time situational awareness to ground forces. Weighing only 3.5 pounds and featuring a digital camouflage skin for increased stealth and up to 90 minutes flight time and silent mission mode, the eBee TAC can be rapidly deployed, from assembly to hand-launch, in three minutes by a single user to generate 3D modeling, terrain and thermal maps. Each system features National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”) compliant drone, sensors and active components, secure extension, Endurance activation, two Endurance batteries, one Pitot Pro-kit, two micro-SD cards with adapters, AES256-bit encryption, pixel camouflage and an IP67 hard transport case with STANAG military standard certification that is lightweight, rugged and dust and water resistant. Camera options include RGB, multispectral and thermal payloads; and the system can also be upgraded to include additional features and payloads.

eBee X – the eBee X has been recognized as the fixed-wing drone that revolutionized the unmanned aerial vehicle sector with its ease-of-use and multiple, state-of-the-art sensors designed to suit a wide range of mapping jobs. At just 1.6 kg (3.5 lbs.), eBee X is a lightweight, ultra-portable solution that is easy for a single person to operate. With a unique Endurance Extension option enabling a flight time of up to 90 minutes and single-flight coverage of up to 500 ha at 122m (1,236 acres at 400 ft.), the eBee X is a premium drone that offers users the high-precision of on-demand RTK/PPK for achieving absolute accuracy of down to 1.5 cm (0.6 in) – without ground control points. This capability makes the eBee X ideal for beyond visual line of sight (“BVLOS”) operations, such as long corridor mapping missions for utility companies, expansive crop scouting in agriculture and by enterprise customers who desire a robust and professional drone fleet. eBee X has been approved for BVLOS and/or object oriented programming (“OOP”) in Brazil, Canada, China, Denmark, France, Spain, and Switzerland.


Market Opportunity for UAVs

Drones have transformed from being freelance videographer toys to mission critical inspection tools for enterprise businesses like construction, energy and agriculture. Moreover, the number of use cases for drones has also grown as drone hardware has become more advanced, safe and reliable. Advanced aerial mapping, crop monitoring, publicly safety uses, disaster response and consumer drone deliveries have all become available as the drone industry has matured. According to a September 2021 article published in Robotics Business Review, titled “What is the Future of Robotics? The Commercial Drone Market Provides Clues,” the author shares that, according to the FAA’s website there are over 350,000 commercial drones in the United States, with some of the largest fleets numbering in the hundreds. “Adoption has been primarily driven by the various safety and efficiency benefits that drones provide to industrial jobsites.” He goes on to note that “these hundreds of thousands of drones are now conducting programmed crop scans, completing exterior building inspections and performing thermal scans of solar farms with routine swiftness. They are keeping workers safely away from disaster areas or dangerous construction tasks (i.e., inspecting roofs, scaling scaffolding, climbing utility poles), saving time and resources and protecting human well-being. However, the industry would not have gotten to this point without the help of advanced software solutions.”

Looking ahead, Allied Market Research reports that the global UAV market is projected to reach $70.9 billion by 2030, up from $24.7 billion in 2020, with the North American market expected to be the highest revenue contributor, accounting for $24.2 billion by 2030 – up from $9.8 billion in 2020. Global tech market advisory firm, ABI Research, is predicting even more pronounced growth, suggesting in its 2021 Small Unmanned Aerial Systems: Annual Update that “the drone market is set to be worth $92 billion by 2030, with a compound annual growth rate of 25% over the $9.5 billion in annual revenue for 2020. Of this revenue, 70% is in the commercial sector ($63 billion).

Sensor Solutions

In January 2021, AgEagle acquired MicaSense’s line of high performance, proprietary sensors, which include:

Altum-PT an optimized three-in-one solution for advanced remote sensing and agricultural research. It seamlessly integrates an ultra-high resolution panchromatic imager, a built-in 320X256 radiometric thermal imager and five discrete spectral bands to produce synchronized outputs such as RGB color, crop vigor, heat maps and high resolution panchromatic in just one flight. Offering twice the spatial resolution of the prior Altum™ sensor, Altum-PT, introduced to market in November 2021 empowers users with deeper analytical capabilities and broader, more diverse applications; enable them to discern issues at the plant level, even in the early growth stages; and conduct early stage stand counting, as well as season-long soil monitoring, among other critical uses. Altum-PT also features a global shutter for distortion-free results, open APIs and a new storage device allowing for two captures per second.

RedEdge-MX – widely viewed as one of the most flexible sensor solutions on the market, with optimized GSD (ground sample distance, or resolution), a DLS two light sensor, a global shutter for distortion-free images, the ability to generate plant health indexes and RGB (color) images from one flight, and the freedom of platform-agnostic data. The RedEdge-MX is considered the industry gold standard for uses that include phenotyping, crop health mapping, water management, fertilizer management, disease identification, species differentiation, weed detection, advanced crop scouting, terrain modeling and leak scouting, among others.

RedEdge-MX Dual Camera Imaging System – a synchronized 10-band solution for advanced remote sensing and agricultural research. This solution seamlessly integrates two five-band cameras, the RedEdge-MX and the RedEdge-MX Blue, capturing 10-band imagery in one flight. The system synchronizes capture of all 10 bands, allowing the creation of multiple indices and deeper analytical insights. During processing, bands from either camera may be used interchangeably. Compatible with DJI drones and industry standard software platforms (Pix4D, Agisoft), this sensor solution ensures that flying with two cameras is just as easy as flying with one and enables direct comparison between satellite and drone data. It is compatible with a wide range of aircraft ranging from large fixed wings to small multirotors; and comes standard with an integration kit for DJI drones. Because the two cameras are both versions of RedEdge-MX, flight planning and data processing can be completed with existing industry-standard tools. The system is plug-and-play and requires no new equipment or upgrading of a user’s software set-up.

RedEdge-P Offering three times the capture speed and twice the spatial resolution of the RedEdge-MX, the all new RedEdge-P, launched in October 2021, builds on the legacy of the rugged, high-quality, multispectral sensor that the industry has come to trust and adds the power of a higher resolution, panchromatic band to double the output data resolution. A single camera solution which is compatible with a wide array of drone aircraft ranging from large fixed wing to small multirotor, RedEdge-P captures calibrated high-resolution multispectral and RGB imagery with an optimized field of view and capture rate for efficient flights. This solution seamlessly integrates a high resolution, all-color imager with synchronized multispectral imagers to enable pixel-aligned outputs at previously unattainable resolutions, while maintaining the efficiency and reliability of its RedEdge legacy. Processing of data outputs are enabled through industry standard software platforms, including AgEagle’s Ground Control flight management software. With RedEdge-P, agricultural professionals benefit from a sensor that can enable effective plant counting and spectral analysis of small plants. Likewise, federal, state and local government and commercial forestry enterprises will also benefit from precise, efficient data collection and tree-level analysis as opposed to being limited to analyzing large swaths of land to make critical forestry management decisions.


The acquisition of senseFly also added several sensor solutions, marketed by senseFly, including:

Aeria X – a compact drone photogrammetry sensor that offers the ideal blend of size, weight and DSLR-like image quality. It produces stunning image detail and clarity in virtually all light conditions, allowing users to map for more hours per day.

Duet M – a high resolution RGB and multispectral mapping camera rig used to create geo-accurate multispectral maps and high resolution digital surface models quickly and easily. This sensor is ideal for water management, such as mapping field drains and areas of compaction; spotting malfunctioning irrigation lines; and evaluating the consistency of plant vigor across a field.

Duet T – a rugged dual RGB/thermal mapping camera rig used to create geo-accurate thermal maps and digital surface models quickly and easily. The Duet T includes a high resolution thermal infrared (640 x 512 px) camera and a S.O.D.A. RGB camera.

S.O.D.A. – the first photogrammetry camera built for professional use which quickly became an industry standard for drone operators worldwide upon being introduced in 2016. It captures sharp aerial images, across light conditions, with which to produce detailed, vivid orthomosaics and ultra-accurate 3D digital surface models.

S.O.D.A. 3D – a professional drone photogrammetry camera that changes orientation during flight to capture three images (two oblique and one nadir) instead of just one, providing for a much wider field of view. It is optimized for quick, robust image processing with Pix4DMapper. Designed specifically for use with the eBee X aircraft, the S.O.D.A. 3D can achieve coverage of vast areas of flat, homogenous terrain (up to 500 ac / 1,235 ac per 122m / 400ft flight). The unique ability of the S.O.D.A. 3D to capture images in two orientations and the resulting wider field of view translates to stunning digital 3D reconstructions in vertically-focused environments. such as urban areas or open-pit mines - anywhere with walls or steep sides. This system of data recording means that less image overlap is needed, resulting in more efficient flights and greater flight coverage, not to mention quicker image processing for results.

S.O.D.A. Corridor – a solution that combines the S.O.D.A. photogrammetry sensor with the Company’s eMotion software that helps make corridor mapping easy. With its portrait camera position, Corridor requires 30% fewer images to map the same linear route and is used in road construction, river mapping, coastline mapping, train track planification and pipeline inspection.

Market Opportunity for Sensor Solutions

Sensors for drones are increasingly being used for surveying, mapping and inspections – particularly in the mining, construction, energy, environmental management, agriculture, infrastructure and waste management industries. Moreover, with every new innovation in sensor technologies, the functionality, and the underpinning value proposition of commercial UAS continues to improve and allows for an even wider range of applications.

Due in large measure to increasing demand of drone sensors for mapping services, LiDAR and GPS, the outlook for the drone sensor market is forecasted to grow to $66.6 billion by 2030, according to a January 2022 research report released by Market Research Future. Verified Market Research (VMR) also published its industry research report in January 2022, stating that the global drone sensor market will climb to $60.67 billion by 2028 from $10.88 billion in 2020, representing a compound annual growth rate of 23.97% from 2021 to 2028. Key market drivers in VMR’s report cite adoption of drones across different industry verticals, including agriculture, landscaping and military and defense, as well as a rise in the need for collecting high quality and real-time data insight.


Our Branded Software Solutions

Ground Control

In April 2021, the Company acquired Measure , an aerial intelligence company and developer of a cloud-based, plug-and-play operating system known as Ground Control. Ground Control provides individual pilots and large enterprises with everything they need to completely automate and scale their drone operations workflows. Key capabilities of the technology include autonomous flight control and data collection, program management and compliance, data processing and analysis and integrations with existing customer systems.

Marketed and sold as a SaaS solution and enabled for both iOS and Android mobile devices, Ground Control ensures safe and automated operations while capturing the real-time, data-driven insights necessary to allow its users to reap the full benefits of their drone systems. With end-to-end program management, user-friendly flight control and in-platform data analysis, Ground Control has helped businesses save thousands of hazardous man-hours and realize millions of dollars in operational benefits. Customers include many Fortune 500 companies and both large and small businesses operating within the energy/utilities, media, insurance, first responder, construction and agriculture markets, among many others.

Ground Control has been integrated with several other industry leading UAS technologies, including AgEagle’s own line of proprietary sensors and airframes. In addition, Ground Control’s industry partnerships include integrations with:

DJI drone platforms, which work seamlessly with Ground Control’s flight app and permits users to sync flights flown with the DJI Go app and use DJI Geo Unlock;
Parrot’s ANAFI, ANAFI USA and ANAFI Thermal drone platforms, which pair ANAFI’s rapid deployment and ease of operation with Ground Control’s standard flight tools, as well as enable users to tailor and expand their use through selection of additional program management and data processing capabilities;
Pix4D software, which makes it easy to create high quality orthomosaics, digital surface models and control maps in the Ground Control platform;
Scopito drone data analysis software, which provides Ground Control customers with easy-to-use drone inspection data delivered in an interactive webmap; and
Wing’s OpenSky airspace access app, which empowers drone flyers to abide by airspace rules and regulations and request authorization to fly in controlled airspace in near real-time wherever OpenSky is available.

eMotion

With the acquisition of senseFly in October 2021, AgEagle expanded its line of proprietary drone flight and data management solutions with the addition of eMotion. With eMotion, flights are built using intuitive mission blocks and flight modes. Users simply need to choose a block (aerial mapping, corridor, etc.), highlight the region they want to map, define key settings, and eMotion auto-generates the drone’s flight plan. Multi-flight missions are supported, and the software’s full 3D environment adds a new dimension to drone flight management, helping users to plan, simulate and control the drone’s trajectory for safer flights, more consistent performance and improved data quality. Moreover, eMotion’s built-in Flight Data Manager automatically handles the georeferencing and preparation of images requires for post-processing in software such as Pix4Dmapper. Connecting wirelessly to a user’s drone, to industry cloud solutions, to survey-grade base stations, and to airspace and live weather data, eMotion is advanced, scalable drone software that anyone can use.

HempOverview Technology

As one of the agriculture industry’s leading pioneers of advanced aerial-image-based data collection and analytics solutions, AgEagle leveraged our expertise to champion the use of proven, advanced web- and map-based technologies as a means to streamline and ultimately standardize hemp cultivation in the United States. Growers need to be registered/permitted; crops need to be monitored and inspected; and enforcement operations must be established to ensure compliance with state and federal mandates. Through HempOverview, we believe that AgEagle represents the first agriculture technology company to bring to market an advanced agtech solution that is designed to meet the unique complexities and vigorous oversight, compliance and enforcement demands of the emerging American hemp industry and the unique needs and demands of its key stakeholders.


HempOverview comprises four modules:

1)Registration: secure, scalable software to handle all farmer and processer application and licensing matters.
2)Best Management Practices: iterative, intelligent data collection and analysis utilizing satellite imagery and advanced, proprietary algorithms to help farmers reduce input costs, avoid missteps, detect pest impacts and monitor water usage.
3)Oversight and Enforcement: integration of data management and satellite imagery to provide continuous monitoring of all hemp fields in the state, predict and respond to issues and assist in proper crop testing.
4)Reporting: generation of actionable reports for the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) requirements, legislative oversight and support of research institutions.

In November 2019, the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (“FDACS”) licensed the HempOverview solution to manage its online application submission and registration process for hemp growers and their farms and hemp fields in the State of Florida for the years 2020, 2021 and 2022. In June 2021, the State of Florida expanded its licensing of the HempOverview platform to provide for access to all four of the modules. FDACS also tasked AgEagle with developing a custom registration software platform to enhance communications, licensing and general compliance relating to the oversight and protection of more than 500 endangered and commercially exploited wild plants native to Florida. For instance, in an effort to curb exploitation of saw palmetto, a plant whose extract is used in herbal supplements often marketed for its urinary tract and prostate health benefits, FDACS requires harvesters and sellers of saw palmetto berries to obtain a Native Plant Harvesting Permit. According to a related FDACS notice, “Widespread gathering of these berries is depleting a wildlife food source and threatening the stability of some ecosystems.”

In January 2021, the Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship also licensed the HempOverview platform to manage the state’s online registration, payment processing, comprehensive data collection and compliance oversight for the 2021, 2022 and 2023 planting seasons.

FarmLens

In 2018, we acquired FarmLens (“FarmLens”), a subscription cloud analytics service that processes data, primarily collected with a drone and makes such data actionable by farmers and agronomists. Our user-friendly FarmLens solution can easily and quickly stitch virtually thousands of high-resolution, multispectral images together to produce detailed prescription maps for everything from disease and pest infestations to weather impact and improper irrigation – all before these issues can be detected by the naked eye and at materially lower costs than satellite imagery or manned aircraft flyovers.

Used as a PC-based system or on any mobile device, FarmLens helps users save time and eliminates technological hassles and costly computing requirements. The FarmLens platform has benefitted us and our shareholders by allowing us to develop important vertically integrated products and services with our drone-enabled software technologies, including HempOverview. FarmLens is currently sold by AgEagle as a subscription service and offered either standalone or in a bundle with drone platforms manufactured by leading drone providers.

Market Opportunity for Drone Software Solutions

  Rapid adoption of UAS for commercial and military purposes continues to fuel the growth of the global drone software market, with particularly robust demand for applications that include mapping and surveillance, agriculture and precision farming, academic research, infrastructure inspection and maintenance, search and rescue and shipping and delivery are expected In a October 2021 market study published by Global Industry Analysts, the world’s only influencer-driven market research company estimated the global market for drone software was $5.7 billion in 2020 and is projected to reach a revised size of $21.9 billion by 2026, growing at a CAGR of 24.7% over the forecast period.

Market Opportunity for U.S. Industrial Hemp and Hemp-Derived CBD

Data Bridge Market Research released a report in January 2022, forecasting that the industrial hemp market will reach $21.2 billion by 2027, representing a compound annual growth rate of 21.02% in its forecast period 2020 through 2027. According to the research firm, the growing preference for eco-friendly products in thermal insulation, construction markets, fiberglass alternatives and automotive products is expected to drive the market through its forecast period. While not as bullish, Grand View Research reported in October 2021 its outlook for the industry, projecting that the global industrial hemp market will reach $12.01 billion by 2028 due to increased use of hemp oil in food and beverage products, as well as increased demand for high quality cosmetics, personal care products and protein supplements. However, Grand View Research also noted the market in North America is expected to register the fastest volume-based CAGR of 21.2% through 2028 primarily due to rising demand for hemp in the automotive industry for manufacturing panels as an alternative to fiberglass.

On February 17, 2022, the USDA released its first National Hemp Report with data on Form 10-Kplanted and elsewhereharvested area, yields per acre, production and value of industrial hemp, based on a survey sent to 20,501 producers. The report formed a benchmark for the crop and help farmers decide how much and what type of hemp to grow.

10

Our Manufacturing Services

For the past several years, security experts have expressed concerns that UAVs made in China or other adversarial countries could be used to spy on U.S. interest by exfiltration of data back to the country of origin. In fact, in May 2019, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security warned in an alert that drones are a potential risk to an organization’s information.

Data released by Drone Industry Insights in late 2019 revealed that China-based Da Jiang Innovations (“DJI”) accounted for about 70% of all drone sales worldwide – and up to 80% of the U.S. market (Source: https://droneii.com/product/chinese- drone-market-report). Citing the threat of Chinese manufacturers, the U.S. General Services Administration (“GSA”) announced in January 2021 that it will no longer include Chinese drones in its suite of offerings as of February 1, 2021. The press release stated, “GSA has recently determined that, due to the significant risk associated with offering drones under GSA’s Multiple Award Schedules (“MAS”) program, it will remove all drones as defined by 49 USC Ch. 448 from MAS contracts, except those drones approved by the Department of Defense (“DoD”) Defense Innovation Unit (“DIU”) through its Blue sUAS Program. DIU’s Blue sUAS Program, is a program that provides secure, trusted, small drone capability to the U.S. government and matures the market for American-made small drones. (Source: https://interact.gsa.gov/blog/removal-drones-gsa-multiple-award-schedule-contracts).

In October 2020, the Department of Justice also recently banned the use of agency grants to purchase drones and other unmanned aerial systems from foreign groups; and the federal government is not likely to stop these limited policy bans. Congress has already taken steps to check DJI’s ability to operate in the U.S. and it is considering more. It effectively cemented the Defense Department’s ban into law in the National Defense Authorization Act for 2020. Congress has also considered broader bans, such as the draft American Security Drone Act of 2021, which would bar any federal agency from acquiring Chinese drones or drones made with Chinese components; and would also codify the different policy prohibitions on using federal grant money to buy Chinese drones and components – an aspect of the law clearly aimed at curbing use of the technology at the state and local levels.

AgEagle believes that these measures to ban China-manufactured drones and components has fueled and will continue to. fuel, demand for “Made in America” drones and components, creating a significant opportunity for U.S.-based drone manufacturers, like AgEagle. Consequently, it is our intention to establish best industry practices and define quality standards for manufacturing, assembly, design/engineering and testing of drones, drone subcomponents and related drone equipment in our Wichita facility.

We will work to optimize our own proprietary designs and customer requirements to meet scalable manufacturing requirements, mission capabilities and equipment specifications. Within this framework, we expect to develop products with feedback and input from manufacturing, quality, supply chain managers, key suppliers, logistics personnel and our customers. We will incorporate this input into product designs in an effort to maximize efficiencies and quality of our products, while minimizing time to market. As a result, we believe that we will achieve a take a product from its design phase to full scale production deliveries while achieving high reliability, quality, and safety yields.

BEYOND Program- Integrating UAVs into National Airspace

In November 2020, AgEagle was selected as an industry partner in the next phase of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (“US DOT”) Unmanned Aircraft System Integration Pilot Program (“IPP”), known as the BEYOND program. The original IPP was launched through a Presidential Memorandum in October 2017 with nine regional participants. The IPP participants and their industry partners used innovative strategies to craft successful safety cases to operate drones under FAA’s existing regulations. On October 30, 2020, the US DOT announced that the three-year IPP successfully concluded on October 25, 2020. In the release, U.S. Chief Technology Officer Michael Kratsios noted, “The IPP propelled the American drone industry forward, allowing for unprecedented expansions in testing and operations through innovative private-public partnerships across the country. Now, the BEYOND program will build upon this success, tackling the next big challenges facing drone integration.”

Eight of the nine state, local and tribal governments that participated in the original program signed new agreements with the FAA to participate in the BEYOND program, including the Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT). AgEagle was selected by KDOT to serve as an industry partner in the BEYOND program to help solve key challenges including:


Beyond Visual Line of Sight (“BVLOS”) operations that are repeatable, scalable and economically viable with specific emphasis on infrastructure inspection, public operations and small package delivery;
Leveraging industry operations to better analyze and quantify the societal and economic benefits of unmanned aerial systems (“UAS”) operations; and
Focusing on community engagement efforts to collect, analyze and address community concerns.

  We believe that once the FAA ultimately determines and approves final regulations allowing for safe integration of commercial UAVs flown BVLOS into the U.S. airspace, the promising growth of drone delivery solutions is sure to take flight; and there has been positive developments in this document. The factors impacting these risksregard.

While it is our intention to continue identifying, pursuing and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:winning contract design, manufacturing, assembly and testing of drone delivery platforms with key industry partners, it is also our intention to design, develop and bring to market our own proprietary, end-to-end drone solutions. Participating in the BEYOND program will empower AgEagle to lead select pilot projects in key areas of interest to us.

Key Growth Strategies

We intend to materially grow our business by leveraging our proprietary, best-in-class, full-stack drone solutions, industry influence and deep pool of talent with specialized expertise in robotics, automation, custom manufacturing and data science to achieve greater penetration of the global UAS industry – with near-term emphasis on capturing larger market share of the agriculture, energy/utilities, infrastructure and government/military verticals. We expect to accomplish this goal by first bringing three core values to life in our day-to-day operations and aligning them with our efforts to earn the trust and continued business of our customers and industry partners:

 

 1.inabilityCuriosity – this pushes us to attractfind value where others aren’t looking. It inspires us to see around corners for our customers, understanding the problems they currently face or will be facing in the future, and obtain additional development capital;delivering them solutions best suited for their unique needs.

2.Passion – this fuels our obsession with excellence, our desire to try the difficult things and tackle big problems, and our commitment to meet our customers’ needs – and then surpass them.

3.Integrity – this is not optional or situational at AgEagle – it is the foundation for everything we do, even when no one is watching.

Key components of our growth strategy include the following:

Establish three centers of excellence with respective expertise in UAS software, sensors and airframes. These centers of excellence will cross pollinate ideas, industry insights and skillsets to yield intelligent autonomous solutions that fully leverage AgEagle’s experienced team’s specialized knowledge and know-how in robotics, automation, custom manufacturing and data science.

 inabilityDeliver new and innovative solutions. AgEagle’s research and development efforts are critical building blocks of the Company, and we intend to achieve sufficient future sales levels or other operating results;continue investing in our own innovations, pioneering new and enhanced products and solutions that enable us to satisfy our customers – both in response to and in anticipation of their needs. AgEagle believes that by investing in research and development, the Company can be a leader in delivering innovative autonomous systems and solutions that address market needs beyond our current target markets, enabling us to create new opportunities for growth.

inability to efficiently manage our operations;
effectGrowth through acquisition. Through successful execution of our hedginggrowth-through-acquisition strategies, on our results of operations;
potential default under our secured obligations or material debt agreements;
estimated quantities and quality of oil and gas reserves;
declining local, national and worldwide economic conditions;
fluctuations in the price of oil and natural gas;
continued weather conditions that impact our abilities to efficiently manage our drilling and development activities;
the inability of management to effectively implement our strategies and business plans;
approval of certain parts of our operations by state regulators;
inability to hire or retain sufficient qualified operating field personnel;
increases in interest rates or our cost of borrowing;
deterioration in general or regional (Colorado, Western Nebraska, Eastern Kansas and South Texas) economic conditions;
adverse state or federal legislation or regulation that increases the costs of compliance, or adverse findings by a regulator with respect to existing operations;
the occurrence of natural disasters, unforeseen weather conditions, or other events or circumstances that could impact our operations or could impact the operations of companies or contractors we depend upon in our operations;
inabilityintend to acquire mineral leases attechnologically advanced UAS companies and intellectual property that complement and strengthen our value proposition to the market. We believe that by investing in complementary acquisitions, we can accelerate our revenue growth and deliver a favorable economic valuebroader array of innovative autonomous flight systems and solutions that will allow us to expandaddress specialized market needs within our development efforts;current target markets and
changes in U.S. GAAP oremerging markets that can benefit from innovations in the legal, regulatoryartificial intelligence-enabled robotics and legislative environments in the markets in which we operate.data capture and analytics.

 


All references in this report to “we,” “us,” “our,” “company” and “EnerJex” refer to EnerJex Resources, Inc. and our wholly-owned operating subsidiaries, EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, Working Interest, LLC, and Black Raven Energy, Inc., unless the context requires otherwise. We report our financial information on the basis of a December 31st fiscal year end. We have provided definitions for the oil and gas industry terms used in this report in the “Glossary” beginning on page 14 of this report.

Competitive Strengths

 

UnlessAgEagle believes the context otherwise requiresfollowing attributes and for the purposes of this report only:     capabilities provide us with long-term competitive advantages:

 

“Exchange Act” refersProprietary technologies, in-house capabilities and industry experience –We believe our decade of experience in commercial UAS design and engineering; in-house manufacturing, assembly and testing capabilities; and advanced technology development skillset serve to differentiate AgEagle in the Securities Exchange Actmarketplace. In fact, approximately 70% of 1934, as amended;our Company’s global workforce is comprised of engineers and data scientists with deep experience and expertise in robotics, automation, custom manufacturing, and data analytics. In addition, AgEagle is committed to meeting and exceeding quality and safety standards for manufacturing, assembly, design and engineering and testing of drones, drone subcomponents and related drone equipment in our Wichita-based manufacturing operations.

“SEC” orAgEagle is more than just customer- and product-centric, we are obsessed with innovation and knowing the “Commission” refersneeds of our customers before they do – We are focused on capitalizing on our specialized expertise in innovating and commercializing advanced drone, sensor and software technologies to provide our existing and future customers with autonomous robotic solutions that meet the United States Securitieshighest possible safety and Exchange Commission;operational standards and fit their specific business needs. We have established three Centers of Excellence that our leadership has challenged to cross-pollinate ideas, industry insights and interdisciplinary skillsets to generate intelligent autonomous solutions that efficiently leverage our expertise in robotics, automation and manufacturing to solve problems for our customers, irrespective of the industry sector in which they may operate.

We offer market-tested drones, sensors and software solutions that have earned the longstanding trust and fidelity of customers worldwide – through successful execution of our acquisition strategy in 2021, AgEagle is now delivering a unified line of industry trusted drones, sensors and software that have been vigorously tested and consistently proven across multiple industry verticals and use cases. For instance, our line of eBee fixed wing drones, pioneered by senseFly, have flown more than one million flights over the past decade serving customers spanning surveying and mapping; engineering and construction; military/defense; mining, quarries and aggregates; agriculture humanitarian aid and environmental monitoring, among just a few. Featured in over 100 research publications globally, advanced sensor innovations developed and commercialized by MicaSense, have served to forge new industry standards for high performance, high resolution, thermal and multispectral imaging for commercial drone applications in agriculture, plant research, land management and forestry. In addition, we have championed the development of end-to-end software solutions which power autonomous flight and deliver actionable, contextual data and analytics for a who’s who of Fortune 500 companies, government agencies and a wide range of businesses in agriculture, energy and utilities, construction and other industry sectors.

“Securities Act” refersOur eBee TAC UAS has been approved by the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) for procurement by the Department of Defense – We are of the belief that the eBee TAC is ideally positioned to become an in-demand, mission critical tool for the Securities ActU.S. military, government and civil agencies and our allies worldwide; and expect that this will prove to be a major growth catalyst for our Company in 2022, positively impacting our financial performance in the years ahead.

Our global reseller network currently has more than 200 drone solutions providers in 75+ countries – By leveraging our relationships with the specialty retailers that comprise our global reseller network, AgEagle benefits from enhanced brand-building, lower customer acquisition costs and increased reach, revenues and geographic and vertical market penetration. With the integration and consolidation of 1933,our 2021 acquisitions, we believe we can leverage our collective reseller network to accelerate our revenue growth by educating and encouraging our partners to market AgEagle’s full suite of airframes, sensors and software as amended.bundled solutions in lieu of marketing only previously siloed products or product lines to end users.

Leading-edge research, regulatory guidance and pilot programs – In order to propel functional commercial applications of drone solutions in real world, real-time environments, and to best aid in the determination and ultimate adoption of a regulatory framework to guide and direct mainstream commercial use of drones beyond visual line of sight, AgEagle is a participant in the FAA’s BEYOND program in Kansas, and is engaged in partnering with other leading drone solutions companies on pilot projects with long-term commercial potential.

 


AVAILABLE INFORMATION

Government Regulation

 

We file annual, quarterlyUAV Regulation

AgEagle’s proprietary drones are subject to regulations of the FAA. On June 21, 2016, the FAA announced it had finalized the first operational rules for routine commercial use of small UAS, which for purposes of the regulations are unmanned aircraft weighing less than 55 pounds that are conducting non-hobbyist operations. UAS operators-for-hire will have to pass a written test and be vetted by the TSA, but no longer need to be airplane pilots as current law requires. The rules went into effect on August 20, 2016. For additional insight into these initial regulations created for commercial UAS operations, please see https://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=20515.

Domestic Hemp Production and Prevailing Regulatory Changes

With the passing of the 2018 Farm Bill in December 2018, industrial hemp is now recognized as an agricultural commodity, such as corn, wheat, or soybeans.

More specifically, the 2018 Farm Bill authorizes state departments of agriculture, including agencies representing the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and any other reportsterritory or possession of the United States, and otherIndian tribal governments, to submit plans to the USDA applying for primary regulatory authority over the production of hemp in their respective state or tribal territory. For more information on state and tribal nation plan submissions, please visit https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/hemp/state-and-tribal-plan-review.

As of February 1, 2022, forty-five states, two U.S. territories and forty-six tribal nations have had their hemp production plans approved by the USDA, and five states will continue to operate their hemp production plans in accordance with the SEC. You can read these SEC filings2014 pilot guidelines issued by the National Institute of Food and reports overAgriculture, which handles the Internet atextramural research aspects of industrial hemp cultivation.

Recent FAA Regulatory Updates

On March 10, 2022, the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov orFAA’s Unmanned Aircraft Systems BVLOS Aviation Rulemaking Committee (“ARC”) – a committee on our website atwww.enerjex.com. You can also obtain copieswhich AgEagle’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) serves as a member – tendered its final report to the Federal Aviation Administration, recommending significant changes to the FAA’s regulations for UAS. As the FAA recognized in prescribing this committee’s original charter in June 2021, “the UAS capability to fly without the pilot onboard, and indeed beyond the pilot’s visual line-of-sight, is what offers the most societal benefits[,]” yet this practice is largely prohibited under existing regulations and has only been permitted on a very limited case-by-case basis through FAA waivers. The central mission of the documents at prescribed rates by writingARC, therefore, was to develop recommendations for regulations that would better support and promote the Public Reference Sectiondevelopment of BVLOS operations.

To that end, the ARC suggested several broad changes to ensure the safe expansion of BVLOS UAS operations. First and foremost, the ARC proposed that the FAA reframe its regulations based on the level of risk acceptable in the use of UAS broadly, rather than trying to create regulations to address specific types of operations. The goal of this approach would be to eliminate the kind of inconsistencies and opacity that may result from the case-by-case waiver approach the FAA has adopted to date. Such an approach, the ARC concluded, would provide “clear guidance for the industry and regulators” while allowing operators to determine the means of compliance that best fit their operations, whether that be “through qualitative or quantitative methods, or a hybrid approach.”

The ARC’s proposal also includes new rules regarding the right of way. In areas considered “Shielded” (within 100 feet of a structure or a critical infrastructure), UAS will have the right of way over other forms of aircraft. Under this proposed rule, UAS will enjoy an operational space that is largely free of crewed aircraft, as a UAS that is operating within the boundaries of a structure or obstacle “would be considered part of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 am and 3:00 pm. Please call the SEC at (800) SEC-0330 for further information on the operationsstructure/obstacle.” The ARC is aware of the public reference facilities. Weundeniable benefits that drone technology offers for the inspection and monitoring of infrastructure and property, as reflected in the proposed rulemaking.

Separately, whether a crewed aircraft must yield to a UAS in “Non-Shielded” areas that are low altitude (below 400 feet) will providedepend on whether the crewed aircraft is equipped with an Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) transmitter or Traffic Awareness Beacon System (“TABS”) broadcasting their position. If so, then the Automatic Dependent Surveillance-B (“ADS-B”) equipped crewed aircraft will have the right of way over drones in nonshielded low-altitude areas; but if the crewed aircraft is not equipped with ADS-B or TABS, then the drone maintains the right of way in those areas. The ARC stated that the purpose of this rule is to improve safety by encouraging the use of ADS-B and TABS systems in low-altitude areas.

While the FAA has recently imposed strict rules on drone operations by requiring they broadcast remote ID information, the ARC’s proposal reflects a copydesire to loosen the regulations in other areas. Very soon, drone manufacturers and operators will be required to comply with the new Remote ID rule (there is a compliance date of our annual report to security holders, including audited financial statements, at no charge upon receipt to of a written request to us at EnerJex Resources, Inc., 4040 Broadway, Suite 425, San Antonio, Texas 78209.September 16, 2022, for manufacturers, and September 16, 2023, for operators). The ARC’s proposal, if codified, will undoubtedly create exciting new opportunities for drone operators within the United States.

 


INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA

Suppliers

In 2021 and 2020, we maintained strong relationships established with companies that provide many of the parts and services necessary to construct our advanced fixed-wing drones, such as MicaSense. On January 26, 2021, the Company and AgEagle Sensor Systems, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Buyer”), entered into a stock purchase agreement (the “MicaSense Purchase Agreement”) with Parrot Drones S.A.S. and Justin B. McAllister (the “Sellers”) pursuant to which the Buyer agreed to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of MicaSense, Inc. (“MicaSense”) from the Sellers. The transaction closed on January 27, 2021. MicaSense manufactures and sells drone sensors for vegetation mapping and other drone applications.

As our Company grows, we expect to pursue additional supplier relationships from which we can source less costly and better supplies to stay ahead of the needs of the market. In addition, we have forged strong relationships with key suppliers in the U.S. and in U.S.-allied countries based on their ability to meet our needs and delivery timelines. We will continue to expand upon our suppliers’ expertise to improve our existing products and develop new solutions. In 2020, we experienced some supply chain delays due primarily to logistical issues relating to COVID-19 shutdown mandates. Unfortunately, we do anticipate encountering potential delays in 2022 for the same reason.

Segment Reporting

 

The market data and certain other statistical information used throughout this report are based on independent industry publications, government publications, reportstable below reflects our revenue by market research firms or other published independent sources. In addition, some data are based on our good faith estimates.

PART Ioperating segment for the years indicated below:

 

  For the Year Ended December 31,
Type 2021 2020
Drones and Custom Manufacturing $2,428,858  $1,218,735 
Sensors  6,793,727    
SaaS  538,367   66,648 
Total $9,760,952  $1,285,383 

ITEM 1. BUSINESSResearch and Development

 

Company HistoryResearch and development activities are part of our business, and we follow a disciplined approach to investing our resources to create new drone technologies and solutions. A fundamental part of this approach is a well-defined screening process that helps us identify commercial opportunities that support current desired technological capabilities in the markets we serve. Our research includes the expansion of our wing products, providing for developing a portfolio of UAVs, sensors and ongoing software platform development costs, as well as other technological solutions to problems to which our existing and prospective customers must confront.

 

We were formerly known as Millennium Plastics CorporationRisks Relating to Our Business

Our business is subject to numerous risks and were incorporateduncertainties, including those highlighted in the Statesection titled “Risk Factors” found in Item 1A within this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Some of these risks include, but are not limited to, risks associated with:

our need for additional funding;
our ability to protect our intellectual property rights;
rapid technological changes in the industry;
governmental policies and regulations regarding the industries in which we operate;
our ability to maintain strong relationships with our customers, suppliers and distributors; and
worldwide and domestic economic trends and financial market conditions, including an economic decline in the agricultural industry.


Recent Developments

Organizational History

On March 26, 2018, our predecessor company, EnerJex Resources, Inc. (“EnerJex”), a Nevada on March 31, 1999. We abandoned a prior business plan focusing oncompany, consummated the developmenttransactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of biodegradable plastic materials. In August 2006, we acquired Midwest Energy,Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), dated October 19, 2017, pursuant to which AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation pursuant to a reverse merger. After the merger, Midwest Energy becameand a wholly-owned subsidiary of EnerJex, merged with and into AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc., a privately held company organized under the laws of the state of Nevada (“AgEagle Sub”), with AgEagle Sub surviving as a resultwholly-owned subsidiary of the merger, the former Midwest Energy stockholders controlled approximately 98% of our outstanding shares of common stock. We changed our name to EnerJex Resources, Inc., in(the “Merger”). In connection with the Merger, EnerJex changed its name to AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. (the “Company, “we,” “our,” or “us”) and AgEagle Sub changed its name initially to “Eagle Aerial, Inc.” and then to “AgEagle Aerial, Inc.” Prior to this merger and in November 2007 we changedall of the name of Midwest Energy (now our wholly-owned subsidiary) to EnerJex Kansas, Inc. (“EnerJex Kansas”). All of our current operations arewere conducted through EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Black Sable”) and Black Raven Energy, Inc. a Nevada corporation (“Black Raven”). OurIts leasehold interests arewere held in ourits wholly-owned subsidiaries Black Sable, Working Interest, LLC, (“Working Interest”) EnerJex Kansas and Black Raven. As of December 31, 2021, the Company continues with the wholly-owned subsidiaries, AgEagle Aerial, Inc. and EnerJex Kansas, Inc.

 

Liquidity and Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

As discussed under “Item 9B — Other Information” the continued low oil and natural gas prices during 2016 and 2017 have had a significant adverse impact on our business, and, as a result of our financial condition, substantial doubt exists thatOn January 27, 2021 (“MicaSense Acquisition Date”), we will be able to continue as a going concern.

On October 19, 2017, EnerJex entered into an Agreement and Plan of Mergera stock purchase agreement (the Merger Agreement“MicaSense Purchase Agreement”) with AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“AgEagle”), which designs, develops, produces,Parrot Drones S.A.S. and distributes technologically advanced small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV or drones) that are suppliedJustin B. McAllister (the “MicaSense Sellers”) pursuant to the agriculture industry, and AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary ofwhich the Company (“Merger Sub”). Pursuantagreed to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will be merged with and into AgEagle, Merger Sub will cease to exist and AgEagle will survive as a wholly-owned subsidiaryacquire 100% of the Company (the “Merger”). The respective boards of directors of EnerJex and AgEagle have approved the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.

At the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), the shares of AgEagle capital stock will be automatically converted into the right to receive 85% of the then issued and outstanding capital stock of MicaSense, Inc. from the Company on a fully-diluted basis. In addition, atMicaSense Sellers (the “MicaSense Acquisition”). The aggregate purchase price for the Effective Time all outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares of AgEagle common stock will be assumed by the CompanyMicaSense was $23,000,000, less any debt, and converted into options and warrantssubject to purchase shares of Company common stock. No fractional shares of Company common stock will be issued in the Merger but will be rounded to the nearest whole share. Following the consummation of the Merger, former stockholders of AgEagle with respect to the Merger are expected to own 85% of the Company’s outstanding common stock (inclusive of the AgEagle assumed stock options and warrants), and current common and Series A Preferred stockholders of the Company are expected to own 15% of the Company, excluding shares of common stock that may be issued in connection with the conversion of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock, and not including any additional shares which may be issued in connection with the Company’s closing obligation to provide up to $4 million in newa customary working capital and the elimination of all liabilities currently on the Company’s balance sheet.

In connection with the Merger, the Company agreed to file a proxy statement seeking stockholder approval (which proxy was filed as part of the Form S-4 Registration Statement filed by the Company which has become effective to date) to: (a) amend the terms of its Series A Preferred Stock (as discussed below); (b) approve the issuance of the Company’s shares in connection with the Merger to the AgEagle shareholders and new investors, in excess of 19.9% of the Company’s total issued and outstanding shares of common stock; (c) approve the issuance of shares to current Company management and directors in lieu of deferred salary and fees, a majority of which will be held in escrow to secure the Company’s indemnity obligations under the Merger Agreement; and (d) change the name of the Company to “AgEagle Aerial Resources, Inc.” 

The Merger Agreement provides that, immediately following the Effective Time, the existing board of directors and officers of the Company will resign and new directors and officers will be appointed by AgEagle.

The Company intends to dispose of its principal assets, consisting primarily of its Kansas oil and gas properties, concurrently with the closing of the Merger. In the event the Merger is not consummated, the Company does not have a present intention to dispose of the above described assets.


Theadjustment. Upon completion of the Merger is subject to various customary conditions, including, among other things: (a) the approvalMicaSense Acquisition, MicaSense became a 100% wholly-owned subsidiary of the stockholders of the Company and AgEagle (which Company shareholder approval has been received to date); (b) the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by each of the Company and AgEagle and the compliance by each of the Company and AgEagle with their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement; (c) approval of the stockholders of the Company for the issuance of its common stock and any other securities (x) to the AgEagle stockholders in connection with the Merger and (y) in connection with the financing transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; (d) approval for the listing of shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued in the Merger and other related transactions on the NYSE American; and (e) that all of the Company’s assets as disclosed shall have been sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of and the corresponding debt and liabilities shall have been extinguished. The Company’s existing cash resources are insufficient to satisfy all of its outstanding liabilities. Accordingly, in order to satisfy the condition and consummate the Merger, the Company will be required to raise additional funding prior to the closing of the Merger, the failure of which could result in the Company’s failure to consummate the Merger Agreement.

The Merger Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, including covenants obligating each of the Company and AgEagle to continue to conduct its respective business in the ordinary course, to provide reasonable access to each other’s information and to use reasonable best efforts to cooperate and coordinate to make any filings or submissions that are required to be made under any applicable laws or requested to be made by any government authority in connection with the Merger. The Merger Agreement also contains a customary “no solicitation” provision pursuant to which, or the completion or termination of the Merger, neither the Company nor AgEagle may solicit or engage in discussions with any third party regarding another acquisition proposal unless, in the Company’s case, it has received an unsolicited, bona fide written proposal that the recipient’s board of directors determines is or would reasonably be expected to result in a superior proposal. The Company has paid AgEagle a $50,000 non-refundable fee at the signing of the Merger Agreement. The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights in favor of each of the Company and AgEagle.

In addition, the Merger Agreement contains provisions for indemnification in the event of any damages suffered by either party as a result of breaches of representations and warranties contained therein. The aggregate maximum indemnification obligation of any indemnifying party for damages with respect to breaches of representations and warranties set forth in the Merger Agreement shall not exceed, in the aggregate, $350,000, other than for fraud, intentional misrepresentation or willful breach. An indemnifying party shall satisfy its indemnification obligations with shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the aggregate amount of losses of the indemnified party, calculated based upon the greater of (i) the value of the Company common stock as of the closing of the Merger; and (ii) the average closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE American for the five trading days immediately prior to the date such a claim is made. The Company has agreed to deposit an aggregate of 1,215,278 shares of common stock to be issued to current officers and directors of the Company in lieu of deferred salary and fees into escrow to secure its indemnification obligations, the issuance of such shares requiring the approval of the Company’s common stockholders.Company.

 

On OctoberApril 19, 2017, concurrently with2021 (the “Measure Acquisition Date”), the execution of the Merger Agreement, a principal stockholder of AgEagle (the “Key AgEagle Stockholder”)Company entered into a votingstock purchase agreement (the “Measure Purchase Agreement”) with Brandon Torres Declet (“Mr. Torres Declet”), in favor of EnerJex (the “EnerJex Voting Agreement”). Pursuant to the EnerJex Voting Agreement, the Key AgEagle Stockholder has agreed, among other things, to vote all shares of capital stock of AgEagle beneficially owned by him in favorhis capacity as representative of the Mergersellers, and the adoption of the Merger Agreement and the approval of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, and any actions required in furtherance thereof. The AgEagle Voting Agreement will terminate upon the earliest to occur of: (i) the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms; or (ii) the date on which the Merger becomes effective.

In connection with, and as a condition to the closing of the Merger, the Company is seeking the consent of the holder of its Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) to amend the terms thereof to: (i) allow the Company to pay all accrued but unpaid dividends up to September 30, 2017 in additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock based on the value of the liquidation preference thereof, (ii) eliminate the right of the Series A Preferred Stock holders to receive any dividends accruing after September 30, 2017, and (iii) convert each share of Series A Preferred Stock into 10 shares of Company common stock. An affirmative vote of 66.7% of all shares of Series A Preferred Stock voting as a class as of the record date of the proxy statement is required to amend the terms of the Certificate of Designation to provide for these changes, as required under the Merger Agreement. As of September 30, 2017, the Series A Preferred Stock had accrued a total of $6,039,972 in accrued but unpaid dividends, which would result in an additional 241,599 shares of Series A Preferred Stock being issued by the Company to satisfy these accrued dividends.

The Merger Agreement provides either party the right to terminate the Merger if it has not been consummated by January 31, 2018, provided that if all of the conditions to closing shall have been satisfied or shall be capable of being satisfied at such time, the required closing date may be extended until March 31, 2018. On January 31, 2018, the Company extended the required closing date with AgEagle to March 31, 2018.

More information regarding AgEagle, its business operations, financial results and risk factors relating thereto, is described in greater detailsellers named in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC on October 20, 2017.

On November 21, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt (“Alpha”) signed a binding commitment letter with the Company to provide prior to or at the closing of the Merger, a minimum of $4 million in new equity capital at a pre-money valuation of between $16 million and $25 millionMeasure Purchase Agreement (the “Private Placement”“Measure Sellers”). Per the terms of this commitment letter, in the event any unaffiliated third parties of EnerJex participate in the Private Placement, Alpha’s obligations to fund the Private Placement shall be reduced by such aggregate gross dollar amount funded by such unaffiliated third parties. Alpha has also agreed to convert all notes they hold from the Company into equity at the closing of the Merger. For their funding commitment, Alpha will receive a fee equal to 2.5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock on a fully-diluted basis payable at the closing of the Merger. Alpha’s obligations to fund the Private Placement shall terminate on the earlier to occur of (i) the consummation of the Merger, and (ii) March 31, 2018. The Company further agreed that, at no time from the date hereof until the consummation of the Merger, shall it provide or disclose to Alpha any “material non-public information” regarding itself, without the prior consent of Alpha. The funding of the Private Placement is subject to standard conditions such as accuracy of representations and warranties provided in the Merger Agreement, and other similar conditions.

At a special meeting of shareholders held on March 21, 2018, the Company’s shareholders approved (a) the issuance of the Company’s common stock to the shareholders of AgEagle in connection with and pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement in accordance with NYSE American Rules 712 and 713; (b) an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to amend the 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock to: (i) allow the Company to pay all accrued but unpaid dividends up to September 30, 2017 in additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock based on the value of the liquidation preference thereof, (ii) eliminate the right of the Series A Preferred Stock holders to receive any dividends accruing after September 30, 2017, (iii) convert each share of Series A Preferred Stock into 10 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment for a reverse stock split (discussed below)), and (iv) increase the number of Series A Preferred shares by 241,599 shares; (c) an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to change the name of the Company to “AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.”; (d) the adoption of the EnerJex 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); (e) the issuance of 2,248,264 shares of common stock to current officers and directors in lieu of deferred salary and fees, a majority of which will be held in escrow to secure the Company’s obligations under the Merger Agreement; (f) the conversion of the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of common stock in order to comply with the listing rules of the NYSE American; (g) the conversion of the Company’s 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock into shares of common stock in order to comply with the listing rules of the NYSE American; (h) the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock, conversion of the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock and conversion of $425,000 owed under five promissory notes held by, Alpha Capital Anstalt, of which $200,000 of the notes have previously been converted into Series C Preferred Stock as of the date of this filing, into shares of common stock in order to comply with the listing rules of the NYSE American. 


The Plan provides for the grant of up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock (such number based on a post-reverse split amount) as awards which may include incentive stock options (“ISOs”), non-qualified stock options (“NQSOs”), unrestricted shares, restricted shares, restricted stock units, performance stock, performance units, SARs, tandem stock appreciation rights, distribution equivalent rights, or any combination of the foregoing, to key management employees, non-employee directors, and non-employee consultants of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (however, solely Company employees or employees of the Company’s subsidiaries are eligible for incentive stock option awards).

Additionally, the Company plans to conduct a 1-for-25 reverse stock split of the Company’s outstanding common stock, which was approved by Company shareholders on April 27, 2017, prior to the closing of the Merger, which the Company anticipates occurring prior to March 31, 2018.

In addition, as discussed below under “Significant Developments in 2017” the Company’s lender sold our loan on May 10, 2017.  

Significant Developments in 2017

The following briefly describes our most significant corporate developments occurring in 2017:

On February 10, 2017, the Company, Texas Capital Bank (“TCB”) and IberiaBank (collectively, “Sellers”), and PWCM Investment Company IC LLC, and certain financial institutions (collectively, “Buyers”) entered into a Loan Sale Agreement (“LSA”), pursuant to which Sellers sold to Buyers, and Buyers purchased from Sellers, all of Sellers’ right, title and interest in, to and under the October 2011 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and related loan documents associated therewith, in exchange for (i) a cash payment of $5,000,000 (the “Cash Purchase Price”), (ii) a Synthetic Equity Interest equal to 10% of the proceeds, after Buyer’s realization of a 150% return on the Cash Purchase Price within five (5) years of the closing date of the sale, with payment being distributed 65.78947368% to TCB and 34.21052632% to IberiaBank, and (iii) at any time prior to February 10, 2022, Buyer may acquire the interest in clause (ii) above. In connection with the LSA, the Company released Sellers and its successors as holders of the rights under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents, including Buyers, from any and all claims under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents. 

Also on February 10, 2017, the Company and its subsidiaries, and successor lender entered into a binding letter agreement dated February 10, 2017, which was subsequently amended on March 30, 2017 (as amended, the “letter agreement”) pursuant to which:

1.the successor lender agreed to forgive our existing secured loan in the approximate principal amount of $17,295,000, and in exchange entered into a secured promissory note (which we refer to as the “restated secured note”) in the original principal amount of $4,500,000.
2.we:
a.conveyed our oil and gas properties and associated performance and surety bonds in Colorado, Texas, and Nebraska;
b.conveyed all of our shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc. (together, the “conveyed oil and gas assets”); and
c.retained our assets in Kansas and continued as a going concern. The Kansas assets currently provide most of our current operating revenue.

The restated secured note:

a.is secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s oil and gas producing assets situated in the State of Kansas,
b.evidences accrued interest on the $4,500,000 principal balance at a rate of 16% per annum,
c.bears interest from and after May 1, 2017, at a rate of 16.0% per annum,

d.is pre-payable in full at a discount at any time during the term of the restated secured note upon the Company paying $3,300,000 to successor lender, and
e.matures and is due and payable in full on November 1, 2017 (subject to the extensions described below).

The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018. We have an option to extend the maturity date of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.

So long as we repay the $3,300,000 in indebtedness on or prior to the maturity date, as extended, all other amounts payable under the restated secured note are to be forgiven.

The closing occurred on May 10, 2017. As part of the closing procedures and net settlement, we issued a promissory note to Pass Creek Resources LLC in the amount of $105,806. The promissory bears interest at 16% per annum and matured on June 9, 2017. The amount due was not paid on June 9, 2017, but the holder has not provided the Company a notice of default.


In connection with the May 10, 2017 closing and in consideration of the satisfaction of $13,425,000 of the amount due under the Credit Agreement, as amended, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries transferred to PCR Holdings LLC, an affiliate of the successor lenders under the Credit Agreement, all of the Company’s oil and gas properties and assets located in Colorado, Texas, and Nebraska, as well as the Company’s shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc.

To evidence the Company’s remaining $4,500,000 of indebtedness to PWCM Investment Company IC LLC (“PWCM”), RES Investment Group, LLC (“RES”), Round Rock Development Partners, LP (“Round Rock”), and Cibolo Holdings, LLC (“Cibolo Holdings,” and together with PWCM, RES and Round Rock, “Successor Lenders”), the Company’s subsidiaries (except Kansas Holdings, LLC) entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Cortland Capital Market Services LLC, as Administrative Agent, and the other financial institutions and banks parties thereto (the “New Credit Agreement”), and a related Amended and Restated Note (the “New Note”), in the amount of $3.3 million as described above. 

Our subsidiaries’ obligations under the credit agreement and note are non-recourse and are secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ oil properties and assets located in Kansas. The Company was removed as a borrower under the Credit Agreement, but entered into a Guaranty of Recourse Carveouts, pursuant to which the Company guarantees its subsidiaries’ payment of certain fees and expenses due under the Credit Agreement, and may be liable for certain conduct, such as fraud, bad faith, gross negligence, and wasteagreed to acquire 100% of the Kansas oil properties or assets.issued and outstanding capital stock of Measure Global, Inc. (“Measure”) from the Measure Sellers (the “Measure Acquisition”). The aggregate purchase price for the shares of Measure is $45,000,000, less the amount of Measure’s debt and transaction expenses, and subject to a customary working capital adjustment. Upon completion of the Measure Acquisition, Measure became a 100% wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

 

On April 27, 2017,October 18, 2021 (the “senseFly S.A. Acquisition Date”), the Company entered into a Services Agreement (“Servicestock purchase agreement with Parrot Drones S.A.S. pursuant to which the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of senseFly S.A. from Parrot Drones S.A.S. (the “senseFly S.A. Purchase Agreement”) with Camber Energy,The aggregate purchase price for the shares of senseFly S.A. is $21,000,000, less the amount of senseFly S.A.’s debt and subject to a customary working capital adjustment. Upon completion of the senseFly S.A.S. Acquisition, senseFly Inc., to perform certain outsourced interim services for $150,000 per month. Effective December 4, 2017, became a 100% wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and Camber Energy, Inc. (“Camber”), mutually agreed to terminate the agreement between the parties effective November 30, 2017.Company.

 

On December 20, 2017,October 18, 2021 (the “senseFly Inc. Acquisition Date), AgEagle Aerial and the Company entered into a Stockstock purchase agreement (the “senseFly Inc. Purchase Agreement for the sale of 1,061,750 shares of its Series A 10% Preferred Stock (“Preferred Stock”Agreement”). The Preferred Stock was sold to one investor at $0.612 per share or the aggregate of $649,791. The Company intends to use the proceeds from the sale of the Preferred Stock to satisfy certain closing conditions of the Merger.

On December 22, 2017, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amendment) with Pass Creek Resources, LLC (“Pass Creek”) and Cortland Capital Market Services, LLC (“Administration Agent”). The Company, Pass Creek, and Administrative Agent are parties to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated May 10, 2017. The Maturity Date of the Loan has been extended to the earlier of (i) February 15, 2018 or April 30, 2018, if (a) the Company provides notice to the Administrative Agent of their intent to extend the maturity date and (b) no later than the first Business Day following delivery of such notice pay a $100,000 extension fee, or (ii) the merger of AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and AgEagle Aerial Systems,Parrot Inc. pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of October 19, 2017. At the closingwhich AgEagle Aerial agreed to acquire 100% of the First Amendment,issued and outstanding capital stock of senseFly Inc. from Parrot Inc. The aggregate purchase price for the Company paid Pass Creekshares of senseFly Inc. is $2,000,000, less the amount of senseFly Inc.’s debt and subject to a $65,000 extension fee and $7,500 to the Administrative Agent for additional fees. The Company also paid the Administrative Agent an additional $45,000 upon the filing of a definitive proxy statement by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company also agreed to borrow Improvement Advances in an amount not to exceed $300,000. The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018. We have the option to extend the maturity date of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.customary working capital adjustment.

 

Our BusinessHeadquarters

 

Our principal strategy, other than completing the Merger as described above,executive offices are located at 8863 E. 34th Street North, Wichita, Kansas 67226 and our telephone number is to acquire, develop, explore and produce domestic onshore oil and natural gas properties.620-325-6363. Our business activities are currently focused in Kansas.

Our total net proved oil and gas reserves aswebsite address is www.ageagle.com. The information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not a part of December 31, 2017 were 0.5 million barrels of oil equivalents (BOE), of which 100% was oil. Of the 0.5 million BOE of total proved reserves, approximately 14.7% are classified as proved developed producing and approximately 85.3% are classified as proved undeveloped.

The total PV10 (present value) ofthis Annual Report. We have included our proved reserves as of December 31, 2017 was approximately $1.5 million. “PV10” means the estimated future gross revenue to be generated from the production of proved reserves, net of estimated production and future development and abandonment costs after giving consideration of salvage value there were no material abandonment costs included in future development costs, using prices and costs in effect at the determination date, before income taxes, and without giving effect to non-property related expenses, discounted to a present value using an annual discount rate of 10% in accordance with the guidelines of the SEC. PV10 is a non-GAAP financial measure and generally differs from the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, because it does not include the effects of income taxes on future net revenues. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Reserves” page 36, for a reconciliation to the comparable GAAP financial measure.

Except where noted, the discussion regarding our businesswebsite address in this Annual Report on Form 10-K issolely as of December 31, 2017.


Our Kansas Propertiesan inactive textual reference.

 

The table below summarizes our current Kansas acreage by project name as of December 31, 2017.

Project Name Developed Acreage(1)  Undeveloped Acreage  Total Acreage 
  Gross  Net(2)  Gross  Net (2)  Gross  Net(2) 
Mississippian Project  4,365   3,492         4,365   3,492 
Other  584   146         584   146 
Total  4,949   3,638         4,949   3,638 

(1)Developed acreage includes all acreage that was held by production as of December 31, 2017.
(2)Net acreage is based on our net working interest as of December 31, 2017.

Mississippian Project

Our Mississippian Project is located in Woodson and Greenwood Counties in Southeast Kansas, where we own a 90% working interest in 4,949 gross acres. Approximately 73.5% of the gross leased acres in this project are currently held-by-production.Employees

 

As of DecemberMarch 31, 2017, our Mississippian Project was producing approximately 100 gross barrels of oil per day from the Mississippian formation at a depth of approximately 1,700 feet. 2022, we employed 121 full-time and 3 part-time employees.

 

Our Business StrategyIntellectual Property

 

SinceWe currently have registered trademarks, several patents or pending patents for our proprietary drone, sensor and software technologies filed in the executionUnited States and certain jurisdictions abroad. We consider our UAV and sensor manufacturing processes to be trade secrets and have non-disclosure agreements with current employees and business partners to protect those and other trade secrets held by the Company.


Where You Can Find Additional Information

The Company is subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act. The Company files with, or furnishes to, the SEC quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports and will furnish its proxy statement. These filings are available free of the merger agreement on October 19, 2017, our primary business strategy has focused on achieving the requirements necessary to consummate the merger. We continue to move forward with this strategy with an anticipated closing prior to March 31, 2018. Prior to our pending merger, our principal strategy focusedcharge on the development of oilCompany’s website, wwwageagle.com, shortly after they are filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet website, www.sec.gov, which contains reports and gas properties that have low production decline ratesinformation statements and offer drilling opportunities with low risk profiles. Our oil and gas operations are in Kansas. The principal elements of our business strategy were:other information regarding issuers.

 

ITEM 1A.Develop Our Existing Properties.  Creating production, cash flow, and reserve growth by developing our inventory of hundreds of drilling locations that we have identified on our existing properties.
Maximize Operational Control.  We seek to operate and maintain a substantial working interest in the majority of our properties. We believe the ability to control our drilling inventory will provide us with the opportunity to more efficiently allocate capital, manage resources, control operating and development costs, and utilize our experience and knowledge of oil and gas field technologies.
Reduce Unit Costs Through Economies of Scale and Efficient Operations.   As we increase our oil and gas production and develop our existing properties, we expect that our unit cost structure will benefit from economies of scale. In particular, we anticipate reducing unit costs by greater utilization of our existing infrastructure over a larger number of wells.RISK FACTORS

 

Our

The risk factors discussed below could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Although we have attempted to list comprehensively these important factors, we caution you that other factors may in the future financialprove to be important in affecting our results will continueof operations. New factors emerge from time to depend on:time and it is not possible for us to predict all of these factors, nor can we assess the impact of each such factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.

 

The risks described below set forth what we believe to be the most material risks associated with the purchase of our Common Stock. Before you invest in our Common Stock, you should carefully consider these risk factors, as well as the other information contained in this prospectus.

Risks Related to Our Business and the Industries We Serve

We operate in evolving markets, which makes it difficult to evaluate our business and future prospects.

AgEagle’s drone, sensor and software technologies are and will be sold in new and rapidly evolving markets. The commercial UAV industry is in the early stages of customer adoption and the FAA’s definition of regulations relating to the integration of commercial drones into the U.S. airspace is still ill-defined but advancing. Accordingly, our business and future prospects may be difficult to evaluate. We cannot accurately predict the extent to which demand for our drone systems and solutions will increase, if at all. The challenges, risks and uncertainties frequently encountered by companies in rapidly evolving markets could impact our ability to do the following:

the market price for oil, gas and natural gas liquids;Generate sufficient revenue to achieve sustainable profitability;
our ability to preserve sufficient working capitalAcquire and maintain access to capital resources;market share;
our ability to cost effectively manage our operations;
Achieve or manage growth in our ability to source and evaluate potential projects;business operations;
our ability to discover and exploit commercial quantities of oil and gas; and
Renew contracts;
Attract and retain software and system engineers and other highly qualified personnel;
Successfully develop and commercial market new products and end-to-end solutions;
Adapt to new or changing polices and spending priorities of prospective clients; and
Access additional capital when required and on reasonable terms.

our ability to implement development program.

 

If we fail to address these and other challenges, risks and uncertainties successfully, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be materially harmed.

We have a history of operating losses and expect to incur significant additional operating expenses.

Through our wholly-owned subsidiary, AgEagle Aerial, Inc., we have been operating for over ten years, but it not until recently that we have acquired the latest go-to-market airframes, sensors and software technologies. We are currently still in the business development stage of our products and commercial sales, and accordingly, we cannot guarantee that we will succeedbecome profitable. Moreover, even if we achieve profitability, given the competitive and evolving nature of the industries in which we operate, we may be unable to sustain or increase profitability and failure to do so would adversely affect its business, including our ability to raise additional funds.


We will need additional funding and may be unable to raise capital when needed, which would force us to delay, curtail or eliminate one or more of our research and development programs or commercialization efforts.

Our operations have consumed substantial amounts of cash since inception. We expect to continue to spend substantial amounts on product and software development. We will require additional funds to support our continued research and development activities, as well as the costs of commercializing, marketing and selling any new products and/or services resulting from those activities.

Until such time, if ever, that we can generate sufficient revenue and achieve profitability, we expect to seek to finance future cash needs through equity or debt financings or corporate collaborations and/or strategic arrangements. On May 25, 2021, the Company entered into an at-the-market Sales Agreement (the "ATM Sales Agreement") with Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated and Raymond James & Associates, Inc. as sales agents (the "Agents"), in connection with the offer and sale from time to time of up to $100,000,000 of shares of the Company's Common Stock (the "ATM Shares"), through an at-the-market equity offering program (the "ATM Offering"). If we are unable to raise additional capital, we may have to delay, curtail or eliminate commercializing, marketing and selling one or more of our solutions. During the period from May 26, 2021 through December 31, 2021, the Company sold 5,705,877 shares of its Common Stock, par value $0.001, at a stock price between $5.00 and $6.30 per share, for proceeds of $30,868,703, net of issuance costs of $954,707.

Product development is a long, expensive and uncertain process.

The development of both UAV software and hardware is a costly, complex and time-consuming process, and investments in product development often involve a long wait until a return, if any, can be achieved on such investment. We might face difficulties or delays in the development process that will result in our inability to timely offer products that satisfy the market, which might allow competing products to emerge during the development and certification process. We anticipate making significant investments in research and development relating to our products and technology services, but such investments are inherently speculative and require substantial capital expenditures. Any unforeseen technical obstacles and challenges that we encounter in the research and development process could result in delays in or the abandonment of product commercialization, may substantially increase development costs, and may negatively affect our results of operations.

Successful technical development of our products does not guarantee successful commercialization.

Although we have successfully acquired our fully-developed go-to-market UAV systems sensor and software technology solutions which we offer for sale or subscription, we may still fail to achieve commercial success for several reasons, including, among others, the following:

failure to obtain the required regulatory approvals for their use;
rapid obsolescence of a product due to new, more advanced technologies;
prohibitive production costs;
competing products;
lack of product innovation;
unsuccessful distribution and marketing through our sales channels;
insufficient cooperation from our supply and distribution partners; and
product development that does not align with or meet customer needs.

Our success in the market for the products and services we develop will depend largely on our ability to properly demonstrate their capabilities. Upon demonstration, our solutions may not have the capabilities they were designed to have or that we believed they would have. Furthermore, even if we do successfully demonstrate our products’ capabilities, potential customers may be more comfortable doing business with our competitor; or may not feel there is a significant need for the products we develop. As a result, significant revenue from our current and new product investments may not be achieved for several years, if at all that will result in profitability to the Company.


We face competition from other companies, many of which have substantially greater resources.

Our competitors may be able to provide customers with different or greater capabilities or benefits than we can provide in areas such as technical qualifications, past contract performance, geographic presence, price and the availability of key professional personnel. Furthermore, many of our competitors may be able to utilize their substantially greater resources and economies of scale to develop competing products and technologies, manufacture in high volumes more efficiently, divert sales away from us by winning broader contracts or hire away our employees by offering more lucrative compensation packages. Small business competitors may be able to offer more cost competitive solutions, due to their lower overhead costs. The markets for commercial drones and services are quickly expanding, and competition is intensifying as additional competitors enter the market and current competitors expand their product offerings. In order to secure contracts successfully when competing with larger, better financed companies, we may be forced to agree to contractual terms that provide for lower aggregate payments to us over the life of the contract, which could adversely affect our margins. Our failure to compete effectively with respect to any of these respects. Further,or other factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition or future operating results.

If we cannot knowfail to protect our intellectual property rights, we could lose our ability to compete in the marketplace.

Our intellectual property and proprietary rights are important to our ability to remain competitive and successful in the development of our products and to our future growth potential. Patent protection can be limited and not all intellectual property can be patented. We expect to rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements and procedures, non-competition agreements and other contractual provisions to protect our intellectual property, other proprietary rights and our brand. We currently only have a limited amount of granted patent or copyright protections, we must rely on trade secrets and nondisclosure agreements, which provide limited protections. As a result, our intellectual property rights may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented by third parties. We may not be able to prevent the unauthorized disclosure or use of our technical knowledge or other trade secrets by employees or competitors.

Furthermore, our competitors may independently develop technologies and products that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technologies and products, which could result in decreased revenues. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, which could result in substantial costs to us and substantial diversion of management’s attention. If we do not adequately protect our intellectual property, our competitors could use it to enhance their products. Our inability to adequately protect our intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business and financial condition, and the value of our brand and other intangible assets.

Other companies may claim that we infringe their intellectual property, which could materially increase our costs and harm our ability to generate future revenue and profit.

We do not believe that our technologies infringe on the proprietary rights of any third party; however, claims of infringement are becoming increasingly common and third parties may assert infringement claims against us. It may be difficult or impossible to identify, prior to receipt of notice from a third party, the trade secrets, patent position or other intellectual property rights of a third party, either in the United States or in foreign jurisdictions. Any such assertion may result in litigation or may require us to obtain a license for the intellectual property rights of third parties. If we are required to obtain licenses to use any third-party technology, we would have to pay royalties, which may significantly reduce any profit on our products. In addition, any such litigation could be expensive and disruptive to its ability to generate revenue or enter into new market opportunities. If any of our products were found to infringe other parties’ proprietary rights and we are unable to come to terms regarding a license with such parties, we may be forced to modify our products to make them non-infringing or to cease production of such products altogether.

The nature of our business involves significant risks and uncertainties that may not be covered by insurance or indemnification.

We have developed and sold products and services in circumstances where insurance or indemnification may not be available, for example, in connection with the collection and analysis of various types of information. In addition, our products and services raise questions with respect to issues of civil liberties, intellectual property, trespass, conversion and similar concepts, which may create legal issues. Indemnification to cover potential claims or liabilities resulting from the failure of any technologies that we develop or deploy may be available in certain circumstances but not in others. Currently, the unmanned aerial systems industry lacks a formative insurance market. We may not be able to maintain insurance to protect against all operational risks and uncertainties that our customers confront. Substantial claims resulting from an accident, product failure, or personal injury or property liability arising from our products and services in excess of any indemnity or insurance coverage (or for which indemnity or insurance coverage is not available or is not obtained) could harm our financial condition, cash flows and operating results. Any accident, even if fully covered or insured, could negatively affect our reputation among our customers and the pricepublic, and make it more difficult for us to compete effectively.


We may incur substantial product liability claims relating to our products.

As a manufacturer of crude oilUAV products, and natural gas prevailing at the timewith aircraft and aviation sector companies under increased scrutiny, claims could be brought against us if use or misuse of production will be at a level allowing for profitable production,one of our UAV products causes, or thatmerely appears to have caused, personal injury or death. In addition, defects in our products may lead to other potential life, health and property risks. Any claims against us, regardless of their merit, could severely harm our financial condition, strain our management and other resources. We are unable to predict if we will be able to obtain additional funding at terms favorableor maintain product liability insurance for any products that may be approved for marketing.

If our subcontractors or suppliers fail to perform their contractual obligations, our performance and reputation as a contractor and our ability to obtain future business could suffer.

We often rely upon other companies to perform work we are obligated to perform for our customers. As we secure more work under certain of our contracts, we expect to require an increasing level of support from subcontractors that provide complementary or supplementary services to our offers. We are responsible for the work performed by our subcontractors, even though in some cases we have limited involvement in that work. If one or more of our subcontractors fails to satisfactorily perform the agreed-upon services on a timely basis or violates contracting policies, laws or regulations, our ability to perform our obligations as a prime contractor or meet our customers’ requirements may be compromised. In extreme cases, performance or other deficiencies on the part of our subcontractors could result in a customer terminating our contract for default. A termination for default could expose us to increaseliability, including liability for the costs of re-procurement, could damage our capital resources. A detailed description of thesereputation and other risks that could materially impacthurt our actual results is in “Risk Factors” under ITEM 1A.ability to compete for future contracts.

 

For certain of the components included in our products, there are a limited number of suppliers we can rely upon. If we are unable to obtain these components when needed, we could experience delays in the manufacturing of our products and our financial results could be adversely affected.

We acquire most of the components for the manufacture of our products from suppliers. Suppliers of some of the components may require us to place orders with significant lead-times to assure supply in accordance with its manufacturing requirements and enter into agreements specifically for our technological services business. Delays in supply may significantly hurt our ability to fulfill our contractual obligations and may significantly hurt our business and result of operations. In addition, we may not be able to continue to obtain such components from these suppliers on satisfactory commercial terms. Disruptions of its manufacturing operations would ensue if we were required to obtain components from alternative sources, which would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If we are unable to recruit and retain key management, technical and sales personnel, our business would be negatively affected.

For our business to be successful, we need to attract and retain highly qualified executive, technical and sales personnel. The failure to recruit additional key personnel when needed, with specific qualifications, on acceptable terms and with an ability to maintain positive relationships with our partners, might impede our ability to continue to develop, commercialize and sell our products and services. To the extent the demand for skilled personnel exceeds supply, we could experience higher labor, recruiting and training costs in order to attract and retain such employees. The loss of any members of our management team may also delay or impair achievement of our business objectives and result in business disruptions due to the time needed for their replacements to be recruited and become familiar with our business. We face competition for qualified personnel from other companies with significantly more resources available to them and thus may not be able to attract the level of personnel needed for our business to succeed.

If our proposed marketing efforts are unsuccessful, we may not earn enough revenue to become profitable.

Our future growth depends on our gaining market acceptance and regular production orders for our products and services. Our marketing plan includes attendance at trade shows, conducting private demonstrations, advertising, public relations, promotional materials and advertising campaigns in print and/or broadcast media. In addition, our marketing plan incorporates strategies to nurture, expand and leverage our global reseller network and relationships with government and defense contractors to achieve greater market penetration in the commercial and government/military verticals. In the event we are not successful in obtaining a significant volume of orders for our products and technology services, we will face significant obstacles in expanding our business. We cannot give any assurance that our marketing efforts will be successful. If they are not, revenue may not be sufficient to cover our fixed costs and we may not become profitable.


Our operating margins may be negatively impacted by reduction in sales or an increase in the merger is not consummated, our intent is to refocus on the developmentcost of oil and gas properties as set forth above. products sold.

 

Drilling ActivityExpectations regarding future sales and expenses are largely fixed in the short term. We maintain raw materials and finished goods at a volume we feel is necessary for anticipated distribution and sales. Therefore, we may not be able to reduce costs in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected shortfalls between forecasted and actual sales.

 

During the years ended December 31, 2017We face a significant risk of failure because we cannot accurately forecast our future revenues and 2016, we had no drilling activity.

Net Production, Average Sales Price and Average Production and Lifting Costsoperating results.

 

The table below sets forthrapidly changing nature of the markets in which we compete makes it difficult to accurately forecast our net oilrevenues and gas production (net of all royalties, overriding royaltiesoperating results. Furthermore, we expect our revenues and productionoperating results to fluctuate in the future due to others)a number of factors, including the following:

the timing of sales or subscription of our products;
unexpected delays in introducing new products and services;
increased expenses, whether related to sales and marketing or administration; and
costs related to possible acquisitions of businesses.  

Rapid technological changes may adversely affect the market acceptance of our products and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The markets in which we compete are subject to technological changes, introduction of new products, change in customer demands and evolving industry standards. Our future success will depend upon our ability to keep pace with technological developments and to timely address the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers by supporting existing and new technologies and by developing and introducing enhancements to our current products and services and new products and services. We may not be successful in developing and marketing enhancements to our products that will respond to technological change, evolving industry standards or customer requirements. In addition, we may experience difficulties internally or in conjunction with key vendors and partners that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction and sale of such enhancements and such enhancements may not adequately meet the requirements of the market and may not achieve any significant degree of market acceptance. If release dates of our new products or enhancements are delayed or, if when released, they fail to achieve market acceptance, our business, operating results and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Failure to obtain necessary regulatory approvals from the FAA or other governmental agencies, or limitations put on the use of small UAS in response to public privacy concerns, may prevent us from expanding the sales of our drone solutions to commercial and industrial customers in the United States.

The regulation of small UAS for commercial use in the United States is undergoing substantial change and the ultimate treatment is uncertain. On February 14, 2012, the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 was enacted, establishing various deadlines for the years ended December 31, 2017FAA to allow expanded use of small UAS for both public and commercial applications. On June 21, 2016, the average sales prices, average production costsFAA released its final rules regarding the routine use of certain small UAS (under 55 pounds) in the U.S. National Airspace System pursuant to the act (the “Part 107 Rules”). The Part 107 Rules, which became effective in August 2016, provided safety regulations for small UAS conducting non-recreational operations and direct lifting costs per unitcontain various limitations and restrictions for such operations, including a requirement that operators keep UAS within visual-line-of-sight and prohibiting flights over unprotected people on the ground who are not directly participating in the operation of production.the UAS. On December 28, 2020, the FAA announced final rules requiring remote identification of drones and allowing operators of small drones to fly over people and at night under certain conditions. We cannot assure you that any final rules enacted in furtherance of the FAA’s announced proposals will result in the expanded use of our drones and drone solutions by commercial and industrial entities. In addition, there exists public concern regarding the privacy implications of U.S. commercial use of small UAS. This concern has included calls to develop explicit written policies and procedures establishing usage limitations. We cannot assure you that the response from regulatory agencies, customers and privacy advocates to these concerns will not delay or restrict the adoption of small UAS by the commercial use markets.

 

  Year ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Net Production        
Crude oil (bbl)  31,834   58,123 
Natural gas liquids (bbl)  75   530 
Natural gas (mcf)  11,649   47,554 
         
Average Sales Prices        
Crude oil ($ per bbl)  41.04   40.75 
Natural gas liquids ($ per bbl)  12.70   7.02 
Natural gas (per $ mcf)  1.67   1.51 
         
Average Production Cost(1)  $  per BOE  39.26   43.79 
Average Lifting Costs(2) $ per BOE  40.29   39.97 

On March 10, 2022, the FAA’s Unmanned Aircraft Systems Beyond Visual Line of Sight Aviation Rulemaking Committee (“ARC”) issued its final report to the FAA. In terms of key recommendations, the ARC recommends that the FAA set an acceptable level of risk (ALR) for UAS that is consistent across all types of operations being performed. The ARC envisions that this approach will allow the FAA to adopt a common and consistent set of regulations and guidance, giving operators the flexibility to meet the ALR through qualitative or quantitative methods, or a hybrid approach. Next, the ARC recommends a series of modifications to the right of way rules in Low Altitude Shielded Areas (within 100’ of a structure or critical infrastructure as defined in 42 U.S.C. § 5195c)2 and in Low Altitude Non-Shielded Areas (below 400’) to accommodate uncrewed aircraft (“UA”) operations. Specifically, the ARC recommends several amendments to Right of Way rules to:

 

 (1)Production costs include all operating expenses, depreciation, depletion and amortization, lease operating expenses (including price differentials) and all associated taxes. Impairment of oil and gas properties is not included in production costs.allow automatic means for see-and-avoid responsibility;

 (2)Direct lifting costs dogive UA right of way in Shielded Areas;

give UA right of way over crewed aircraft that are not include impairment expenseequipped with ADS-B or depreciation, depletionTABS in Non-Shielded Low Altitude Areas; and amortization, but do include transportation costs, which

give crewed aircraft that are paid to our purchasers as a price differential.equipped with ADS-B or TABS (and broadcasting their position) right of way in Non-Shielded Low Altitude Areas.

 

ResultsThe ARC also recommends an approach to operator qualification that would extend Part 107, Remote Pilot Certificate with Small UAS Rating, to cover topics associated with Extended Visual Line of OilSight (EVLOS) and Gas Producing Activities

shielded UAS operations. The following table showsrecommendation creates a new Remote Pilot certificate rating to cover BVLOS operations beyond the results of operations from our oil and gas producing activities from the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Results of operations from these activities have been determined using historical revenues, production costs, depreciation, depletion and amortizationscope of the capitalized costs subjectextended Part 107 rating. The examination for both ratings would consist of a knowledge test on relevant areas, while practical training and qualifications would be tied to amortization. Generalnew Remote Air Carrier and administrative expensesRemote Operating certificates, which would be required for most commercial 1-to-many operations. The qualifications would be based on specific UA systems, Use Cases, and interest expense have been excluded from this determination.

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Production revenues $1,329,004  $2,461,727 
Production costs  (1,363,946)  (2,661,258)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  (127,713)  (254,329)
Results of operations for producing activities $(162,655) $(453,860)

Active Wells

The following table sets forth the number of wells in which we owned a working interest that were actively producing oil and gas or actively injecting water as of December 31, 2017.

  Active 
Project Gross  Net(1) 
Crude Oil        
Mississippian Project  45   40.5 
Other  3   2.7 
Total Oil  48   43.2 

(1)Net wells are based on our net working interest as of December 31, 2017.


Reserves

Proved Reserves

The estimated total PV10 (present value) of our proved reserves as of December 31, 2017 was $1.5 million, compared to $3.4 million as of December 31, 2016. Our total net proved oil and gas reserves as of December 31, 2017 were 0.5 million BOE (100% oil), compared to 1.6 million BOE (64.1% natural gas) as of December 31, 2016. Of the 0.5 million net BOE of total proved reserves at December 31, 2017, approximately 14.7% are classified as proved developed producing and approximately 85.3% are classified as proved undeveloped. See “Glossary” on page 14 for our definition of PV10.

The estimated PV10 of the 0.5 million BOE is set forth in the following table. The PV10 is calculated using an average net oil price of $45.45 per barrel and by applying an annual discount rate of 10% to the forecasted future net cash flow.

Summary of Proved Oil and Gas Reserves

December 31, 2017

  Gross  Net    
     Natural
Gas 
     Oil      Natural
Gas 
     Oil     
Proved Reserves Crude Oil  Liquids  Natural Gas  Equivalents  Crude Oil  Liquids  Natural Gas  Equivalents  PV 10(2) 
Category BBL’s  BBL’s  MCF’s  BOE’s  BBL’s  BBL’s  MCF’s  BOE’s(1)  (before tax) 
Proved, Developed  94,100         94,100   66,810         66,810   511,740 
Proved, Undeveloped  525,100         525,100   388,980         388,980   956,800 
Total Proved  619,200         619,200   455,800         455,800   1,468,540 

(1)Net BOE is based upon our net revenue interest
(2)See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Reserves” page 34 for a reconciliation to the comparable GAAP financial measure.

Oil and Gas Reserves Reported to Other Agencies

We did not file any estimates of total proved net oil and gas reserves with, or include such information in reports to any federal authority or agency, other than the SEC, during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Title to Properties

We believe that we have satisfactory title to or rights in all of our producing properties. As is customary in the oil and gas industry, minimal investigation of title is made at the time of acquisition of undeveloped properties. In most cases, we investigate title and obtain title opinions from counsel or have title reviewed by professional landmen only when we acquire producing properties or before we begin drilling operations. However, any acquisition of producing properties without obtaining title opinions is subject to a greater risk of title defects.

Our properties are subject to customary royalty interests, liens under indebtedness, liens incident to operating agreements and liens for current taxes and other burdens, including mineral encumbrances andoperational restrictions. Further, our debt is secured by liens substantially on all of our assets. These burdens have not materially interfered with the use of our properties in the operation of our business to date, though there can be no assurance that such burdens will not materially impact our operations in the future.

Sale of Oil and Gas

We do not intend to refine our oil production. We expect to sell all or most of our production to a small number of purchasers in a manner consistent with industry practices at prevailing rates by means of long-term and short-term sales contracts, some of which may have fixed price components. In 2017, we sold oil to ARM Energy Management LLC, Coffeyville Resources, Inc., and Sunoco Logistics, Inc. on a month-to-month basis (i.e., without a long-term contract). We sold our natural gas to United Energy Trading on a month-to-month basis and Western Operating Company under a long-term contract. Under current conditions, we should be able to find other purchasers, if needed. All of our produced oil is held in tank batteries. Each respective purchaser picks up the oil from our tank batteries and transports it by truck to refineries.


Secondary Recovery and Other Production Enhancement Strategies

When an oil field is first produced, the oil typically is recovered as a result of natural pressure within the producing formation, often assisted by pumps of various types. The only natural force present to move the crude oil to the wellbore is the pressure differential between the higher pressure in the formation and the lower pressure in the wellbore. At the same time, there are many factors that act to impede the flow of crude oil, depending on the nature of the formation and fluid properties, such as pressure, permeability, viscosity and water saturation. This stage of production is referred to as “primary production”, which typically only recovers 5% to 15% of the crude oil originally in place in a producing formation.

Production from oil fields can often be enhanced through the implementation of “secondary recovery”, also known as water flooding, which is a method in which water is injected into the reservoir through injector wells in order to maintain or increase reservoir pressure and push oil to the adjacent producing wellbores. We utilize water flooding as a secondary recovery technique for the majority of our oil properties in Kansas.

As a water flood matures over time, the fluid produced contains increasing amounts of water and decreasing amounts of oil. Surface equipment is used to separate the produced oil from water, with the oil going to holding tanks for sale and the water being re-injected into the oil reservoir.

 

In addition, we may utilize 3D seismic analysis, horizontal drilling,the ARC recommends that the FAA establish a new BVLOS Rule which includes a process for qualification of UA and other technologies and production techniquesUAS, applicable to improve drilling results and oil recovery, andaircraft up to ultimately enhance our production and returns. We also believe use800,000 ft-lb of such technologies and production techniques in exploring for, developing, and exploiting oil properties will help us reduce drilling risks, lower finding costs and provide for more efficient production of oil from our properties.kinetic energy (in accordance with the Operation Risk Matrix).

 

MarketsFinally, the ARC recommends that the FAA adopt a non-mandatory regulatory scheme for third party services to be used in support of UAS BVLOS operations. In addition to its recommendations, the ARC identified certain issues relevant to UAS BVLOS operations that are beyond this ARC’s scope, but which are identified in this report as considerations for future ARCs to address. Similarly, the ARC also identified several issues that are beyond the FAA’s scope of authority. However, these recommendations are in the interest of providing a full framework of actions and Marketingpolicies to promote safe and widespread adoption of UAS BVLOS activities.

 

The oilFederal, state and gas industry has experienced dramatic price volatilitytribal government regulation of domestic hemp cultivation is new and subject to constant change and evolution, and unfavorable developments could have an adverse effect on our operating results.

Any changes in recent years. As a commodity, global oil prices respondlaws or regulations relating to macro-economic factors affecting supplydomestic hemp cultivation could adversely affect our business, results of operations and demand. In particular, world oil prices have risen and fallen in response to political unrest and supply uncertaintyour business prospects for our HempOverview SaaS platform.

We may pursue additional strategic transactions in the Middle East,future, which could be difficult to implement, disrupt our business or change our business profile significantly.

We intend to consider additional potential strategic transactions, which could involve acquisitions of businesses or assets, joint ventures or investments in businesses, products or technologies that expand, complement or otherwise relate to our current or future business. We may also consider, from time to time, opportunities to engage in joint ventures or other business collaborations with third parties to address particular market segments. Should our relationships fail to materialize into significant agreements, or should we fail to work efficiently with these companies, we may lose sales and changing demand for energymarketing opportunities and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

These activities, if successful, create risks such as, among others: (i) the need to integrate and manage the businesses and products acquired with our own business and products; (ii) additional demands on our resources, systems, procedures and controls; (iii) disruption of our ongoing business; (iv) potential unknown or unquantifiable liabilities associated with the target company; and (v) diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns. Moreover, these transactions could involve: (a) substantial investment of funds or financings by issuance of debt or equity securities; (b) substantial investment with respect to technology transfers and operational integration; and (c) the acquisition or disposition of product lines or businesses. Also, such activities could result in rapidly emerging market economies, notably Indiaone-time charges and China. North American prospects became more attractive as oil prices rose worldwide. Escalating conflictsexpenses and have the potential to either dilute the interests of our existing shareholders or result in the Middle Eastissuance of, or assumption of debt. Such acquisitions, investments, joint ventures or other business collaborations may involve significant commitments of financial and other resources. Any such activities may not be successful in generating revenue, income or other returns, and any resources we committed to such activities will not be available to us for other purposes. Moreover, if we are unable to access the abilitycapital markets on acceptable terms or at all, we may not be able to consummate acquisitions, or may have to do so on the basis of OPECa less than optimal capital structure. Our inability to control supplytake advantage of growth opportunities or address risks associated with acquisitions or investments in businesses may negatively affect our operating results.


Additionally, any impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets acquired in an acquisition or in an investment, or charges to earnings associated with any acquisition or investment activity, may materially reduce our earnings. Future acquisitions or joint ventures may not result in their anticipated benefits and pricing are somewe may not be able to properly integrate acquired products, technologies or businesses with our existing products and operations or successfully combine personnel and cultures. Failure to do so could deprive us of the factors impactingintended benefits of those acquisitions.

Breaches of network or information technology security could have an adverse effect on our business.

Cyber-attacks or other breaches of technology platforms or IT security may cause equipment failures or disrupt our systems and operations. We may be subject to attempts to breach the availabilitysecurity of global supply. Asour technology platforms and IT infrastructure through cyber-attack, malware, computer viruses and other means of unauthorized access. The potential liabilities associated with these events could exceed the insurance coverage we maintain. Our inability to operate our facilities as a commodity, natural gas prices respond mainlyresult of such events, even for a limited period of time, may result in significant expenses or loss of market share to regional supplyother competitors in the defense electronics market. In addition, a failure to protect the privacy of customer and demand imbalances. Factorsemployee confidential data against breaches of technology platforms or IT security could result in damage to our reputation. To date, we have not been subject to cyber-attacks or other cyber incidents which, individually or in the aggregate, resulted in a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

The preparation of our financial statements involves use of estimates, judgments and assumptions, and our financial statements may be materially affected if our estimates prove to be inaccurate.

Financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States require the use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the supply side include production ofreported amounts. Different estimates, judgments, and assumptions reasonably could be used that would have a material effect on the financial statements, and changes in these estimates, judgments and assumptions are likely to occur from period to period in the future. These estimates, judgments, and assumptions are inherently uncertain, and, if they prove to be wrong, then we face the risk that charges to income will be required.

Our results could be adversely affected by natural gas, levels of natural gas imports and fluctuations in underground storage. Factors that affect the demand side include peak demand brought on by winter heating and summer cooling requirements and increasing demand from the petrochemical industry for their produced productsdisasters, public health crises, political crises or other catastrophic events.

Natural disasters, such as plastics, fertilizers, paints, soaps etc. The costs of steelhurricanes, tornadoes, floods, earthquakes and other products used to construct drilling rigsadverse weather and pipeline infrastructure, as well as, drilling and well-servicing rig rates, are impacted by the commodity price volatility.

Our market is affected by many factors beyond our control,climate conditions; unforeseen public health crises, such as the availability of other domestic production, commodity prices, the proximitypandemics and capacity of oil and gas pipelines, and general fluctuations of global and domestic supply and demand. In 2017 we had month-to-month sales contracts with ARM Energy Management LLC, Coffeyville Resources, Inc., Sunoco Logistics, Inc., United Energy Trading and Western Operating Company and we do not anticipate difficulty in finding additional sales opportunities, as and when needed.

Oil and gas sales prices are negotiated based on factorsepidemics; political crises, such as the spot price or posted price for oil and gas, price regulations, regional price variations, hydrocarbon quality, distances from wells to pipelines, well pressure, and estimated reserves. Many of these factors are outside our control. Oil and gas prices have historically experienced high volatility, related in part to ever-changing perceptions within the industry of future supply and demand.

Competition

The oil and gas industry is intensely competitive and we must compete against larger companies that may have greater financial and technical resources than we do and substantially more experience in our industry. These competitive advantages may better enable our competitors to sustain the impact of higher exploration and production costs, oil and gas price volatility, productivity variances between properties, overall industry cyclesterrorist attacks, war, labor unrest, and other factors relatedpolitical instability; or other catastrophic events, such as disasters occurring at our manufacturing facilities, could disrupt our operations or the operations of one or more of our vendors. In particular, these types of events could impact our product supply chain from or to our industry. Their advantage may also negativelythe impacted region and could impact our ability to acquire prospective properties, develop reserves, attractoperate. In addition, these types of events could negatively impact consumer spending in the impacted regions. Disasters occurring at our manufacturing facilities could impact our reputation and retain quality personnelour customers’ perception of our brands. To the extent any of these events occur, our operations and raise capital.financial results could be adversely affected.

 

ResearchFor instance, Russia’s recent military interventions in Ukraine have led to, and Development Activities

We have not spent a material amount of time or money on research and development activities inmay lead to, additional sanctions being levied by the last two years.


Governmental Regulations

Our oil and gas exploration, production and related operations, when developed, are subject to extensive rules and regulations promulgated by federal, state, tribal and local authorities and agencies that impose requirements relating to the exploration and production of oil and natural gas. For example, laws and regulations often address conservation matters, including provisions for the unitization or pooling of oil and gas properties, the spacing, plugging and abandonment of wells, rates of production, water discharge, prevention of waste,United States, European Union and other matters. Priorcountries against Russia. Russia’s military incursion and the resulting sanctions could adversely affect global energy and financial markets. Although our business does not have any direct exposure to drilling, weRussia or the adjoining geographic regions, the extent and duration of the military action, sanctions, and resulting market disruptions are often required to obtain permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds and file reports concerning operations. Failure to comply with any such rules and regulations can result in substantial penalties. Moreover, laws and regulations may place burdens from previous operations on current lease owners that can be significant.

The public attention on the production of oil and gas will most likely increase the regulatory burden on our industry and increase the cost of doing business, which may affect our profitability. Although we believe we are currently in substantial compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, because such rules and regulations are frequently amended or reinterpreted, we are unableimpossible to predict, but could be substantial. Any such disruptions caused by Russian military action or resulting sanctions may magnify the future cost or impact of complying with such laws. Significant expenditures may be required to comply withother risks described in this section. We cannot predict the progress or outcome of the situation in Ukraine, as the conflict and governmental lawsreactions are rapidly developing and regulations and maybeyond our control. Prolonged unrest, intensified military activities, or more extensive sanctions impacting the region could have a material adverse effect on the global economy, and such effect could in turn have a material adverse effect on the operations, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and business outlook of our business.

Our business may be adversely affected by the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.

In December 2019, a novel coronavirus disease (“COVID-19”) was reported. On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (“WHO”) declared COVID-19 a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. On February 28, 2020, the WHO raised its assessment of the COVID-19 threat from high to very high at a global level due to the continued increase in the number of cases and affected countries, and on March 11, 2020, the WHO characterized COVID-19 as a pandemic.

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has evolved into a global pandemic. The coronavirus has spread to many regions of the world, including the United States. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our business and operating results will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be accurately predicted, including new information that may emerge concerning COVID-19 and the actions to contain the coronavirus or treat its impact, among others.


The spread of the coronavirus, which has caused a broad impact globally, including restrictions on travel and quarantine policies put into place by businesses and governments, may have a material economic effect on our business. While the potential economic impact brought on by and the duration of the pandemic may be difficult to assess or predict, it has already caused, and is likely to result in further, significant disruptions of global financial markets, which may reduce our ability to access capital either at all or on favorable terms. In addition, a recession, depression or other sustained adverse market event resulting from the spread of the coronavirus could materially and adversely affect our business and the value of our Common Stock.

In addition, as a result of the pandemic, our ability to access components and parts needed in order to manufacture our proprietary drones and sensors, and to perform quality testing have been impacted. If either we or any third-parties in the supply chain for materials used in our manufacturing and assembly processes continue to be adversely impacted by restrictions resulting from the coronavirus pandemic, our supply chain may be further disrupted, limiting our ability to manufacture and assemble products.

The ultimate impact of the current pandemic, or any other health epidemic, is highly uncertain and subject to change. We do not yet know the full extent of potential delays or impacts on our business or the global economy as a whole. However, these effects could have a material impact on our operations. We will continue to monitor the situation closely.

Worldwide and domestic economic trends and financial market conditions, including an economic decline in the agricultural industry, may adversely affect our operating performance.

We intend to distribute our products and services in a number of countries and derive revenues from both inside and outside the United States. We expect our business will be subject to global competition and may be adversely affected by factors in the United States and other countries that are beyond our control, such as disruptions in financial markets, economic downturns in the form of either contained or widespread recessionary conditions, elevated unemployment levels, sluggish or uneven recovery, in specific countries or regions, or in the agricultural industry; social, political or labor conditions in specific countries or regions; natural and other disasters affecting our operations or our customers and suppliers; or adverse changes in the availability and cost of capital, interest rates, tax rates, or regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Unfavorable global or regional economic conditions, including an economic decline in the agricultural industry, could adversely impact our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our senior management and key employees are important to our customer relationships and overall business.

We believe that our success depends in part on the continued contributions of our senior management and key employees. We rely heavily on our executive officers, senior management and key employees to generate business and execute programs successfully. In addition, the relationships and reputation that members of our management team and key employees have established and maintain with certain key customers continue to our ability to maintain good customer relations and to identify new business opportunities. The loss of any of our executive officers, members of our senior management team or key employees could significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our business objectives and could materially harm our business and customer relationships and impair our ability to identify and secure new contracts and otherwise manage our business.

We indemnify our officers and directors against liability to us and our security holders, and such indemnification could increase our operating costs.

Our bylaws allow us to indemnify our officers and directors against claims associated with carrying out the duties of their offices. Our bylaws also allow us to reimburse them for the costs of certain legal defenses. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our officers, directors or control persons, the SEC has advised that such indemnification is against public policy and is therefore unenforceable.


Risks Associated with Our Capital Stock

The market price weof our securities may receivebe volatile and may fluctuate in a way that is disproportionate to our operating performance.

Our securities may experience substantial volatility as a result of a number of factors, including, among others:

sales or potential sales of substantial amounts of our Common Stock;
announcements about us or about our competitors or new product introductions;
developments concerning our product manufacturers;
the loss or unanticipated underperformance of our global distribution channel;
litigation and other developments relating to our patents or other proprietary rights or those of our competitors;
conditions in the UAV, domestic hemp cultivation and drone-enabled package delivery industries;
governmental regulation and legislation;
variations in our anticipated or actual operating results;
changes in securities analysts’ estimates of our performance, or our failure to meet analysts’ expectations;
foreign currency values and fluctuations; and
overall political and economic conditions, including Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Many of these factors are beyond our control. The stock markets have historically experienced substantial price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. These broad market and industry factors could reduce the market price of our securities, regardless of our actual operating performance.

We do not intend to pay cash dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, will be your sole source of gain.

We intend to retain future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business. In addition, the terms of existing and future debt agreements may preclude us from paying dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, from the sale of oil and gasour Common Stock will be affected byyour sole source of gain for the costforeseeable future.

Provisions in our articles of transporting products to markets. Effective January 1, 1995, FERC implemented regulations establishing an indexing system for transportation rates for oilincorporation, our by-laws and gas pipelines, which, generally, would index such rates to inflation, subject to certain conditionsNevada law might discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company or changes in our management and, limitations. We are not able to predict with certaintytherefore, depress the trading price of our Common Stock.

Provisions of our Articles of Incorporation, our By-Laws and Nevada law may have the effect if any, of deterring unsolicited takeovers or delaying or preventing a change in control of our Company or changes in our management, including transactions in which our stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then current market prices. In addition, these regulations on our intended operations. However,provisions may limit the regulationsability of stockholders to approve transactions that they may increase transportation costs or reduce well head prices for oil and natural gas.deem to be in their best interests. These provisions include:

 

Environmental Matters

Our operations and properties are subject to extensive and changing federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection, including the generation, storage, handling, emission, transportation and discharge of materials into the environment, and relating to safety and health. The recent trend in environmental legislation and regulation generally is toward stricter standards, and this trend will likely continue.

These laws and regulations may:

require the inability of stockholders to call special meetings; and
the ability of our board of directors to designate the terms of and issue new series of preferred stock without stockholder approval, which could include the right to approve an acquisition or other change in our control or could be used to institute a rights plan, also known as a poison pill, that would work to dilute the stock ownership of a permit or other authorization before construction or drilling commences and for certain other activities;
limit or prohibit construction, drilling and other activities on certain lands; and
impose substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from its operations, or due to previous operations conducted on any leased lands.potential hostile acquirer, likely preventing acquisitions that have not been approved by our board of directors.

 

The permits required for our operations may be subject to revocation, modification and renewal by issuing authorities. Governmental authorities have the power to enforce their regulations, and violations are subject to fines or injunctions, or both. In the opinion of management, we are in substantial compliance with current applicable environmental laws and regulations, and have no material commitments for capital expenditures to comply with existing environmental requirements. Nevertheless, changes in existing environmental laws and regulations or in interpretations thereof could have a significant impact on us, as well as the oil and gas industry in general.

The Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation,existence of the forgoing provisions and Liability Act, as amended (“CERCLA”), and comparable state statutes impose strict, joint and several liability on owners and operatorsanti-takeover measures could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of sites and on persons who disposedour Common Stock. They could also deter potential acquirers of or arrangedour company, thereby reducing the likelihood that you could receive a premium for the disposal of “hazardous substances” found at such sites. It is not uncommon for the neighboring land owners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the hazardous substances released into the environment. The Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended (“RCRA”), and comparable state statutes govern the disposal of “solid waste” and “hazardous waste” and authorize the imposition of substantial fines and penalties for noncompliance. Although CERCLA currently excludes petroleum from its definition of “hazardous substance,” state laws affecting our operations may impose clean-up liability relating to petroleum and petroleum related products. In addition, although RCRA classifies certain oil and gas field wastes as “non-hazardous”, such exploration and production wastes could be reclassified as hazardous wastes thereby making such wastes subject to more stringent handling and disposal requirements.

The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, as amended (“Clean Water Act”), and analogous state laws impose restrictions and controls on the discharge of pollutants into federal and state waters. These laws also regulate the discharge of storm wateryour Common Stock in process areas. Pursuant to these laws and regulations, we are required to obtain and maintain approvals or permits for the discharge of wastewater and storm water and develop and implement spill prevention, control and countermeasure plans, also referred to as “SPCC plans”, in connection with on-site storage of greater than threshold quantities of oil and gas. The EPA issued revised SPCC rules in July 2002 whereby SPCC plans are subject to more rigorous review and certification procedures. We believe that our operations are in substantial compliance with applicable Clean Water Act and analogous state requirements, including those relating to wastewater and storm water discharges and SPCC plans.an acquisition.

 


The Endangered Species

We incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public reporting company, and our management is required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives.

As a public reporting company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses not otherwise incurred by a private company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act as amended (“ESA”), seeksof 2002 and rules subsequently implemented by the SEC, have imposed various requirements on public companies, including establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel continue to ensuredevote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations have increased our legal and financial compliance costs and have made some activities more time consuming and costly. For example, we expect that activities do not jeopardize endangered or threatened animal, fishthese rules and plant species, nor destroy or modifyregulations will continue to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance.

We currently have outstanding, and we may in the critical habitatfuture issue, instruments which are convertible into shares of such species. Under ESA, exploration and production operations, as well as actions by federal agencies, may not significantly impair or jeopardize the species or its habitat. ESA provides for criminal penalties for willful violations of the Act. Other statutes that provide protection to animal and plant species and that may applyCommon Stock, which will result in additional dilution to our operations include, but are not necessarily limited to, the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, the Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the National Historic Preservation Act. Although we believe that our operations will be in substantial compliance with such statutes, any change in these statutes or any reclassification of a species as endangered could subject us to significant expenses to modify our operations or could force us to discontinue certain operations altogether.

Personnelshareholders.

 

We currently have one full-time employee. We are usingan outstanding instrument which is convertible into shares of Common Stock, and will continuewe may need to use independent consultants and contractors to perform various professional services, particularlyissue similar instruments in the area of land services, reservoir engineering, and general and administrative functions. We believe that this use of third-party service providers may enhance our ability to contain operating and general expenses, and capital costs.

GLOSSARY

TermDefinition
Barrel (Bbl)The standard unit of measurement of liquids in the petroleum industry, it contains 42 U.S. standard gallons. Abbreviated to “bbl”.
BasinA depression in the crust of the Earth, caused by plate tectonic activity and subsidence, in which sediments accumulate. Sedimentary basins vary from bowl-shaped to elongated troughs. Basins can be bounded by faults. Rift basins are commonly symmetrical; basins along continental margins tend to be asymmetrical. If rich hydrocarbon source rocks occur in combination with appropriate depth and duration of burial, then a petroleum system can develop within the basin.
BOEAbbreviation for a barrel of oil equivalent and is a term used to summarize the amount of energy that is equivalent to the amount of energy found in a barrel of crude oil. On a BTU basis 6,000 cubic feet of natural gas is the energy equivalent to one barrel of crude oil. A conversion ratio of 6:1 is used to convert natural gas measured in thousands of cubic feet into an equivalent barrel of oil.
BOPDAbbreviation for barrels of oil per day, a common unit of measurement for volume of crude oil. The volume of a barrel is equivalent to 42 U.S. standard gallons.
Carried Working InterestThe owner of this type of working interest in the drilling of a well incurs no capital contribution requirement for drilling or completion costs associated with a well and, if specified in the particular contract, may not incur capital contribution requirements beyond the completion of the well.
Completion/CompletingThe activities and methods of preparing a well for the production of oil and gas or for other purposes such as injection.
DevelopmentThe phase in which a proven oil or natural gas field is brought into production by drilling development wells.
Development DrillingWells drilled during the Development phase.
Division OrderA directive signed by all owners verifying to the purchaser or operator of a well the decimal interest of production owned by the royalty owner and other working interest owners. The Division Order generally includes the decimal interest, a legal description of the property, the operator’s name, and several legal agreements associated with the process. Completion of this step generally precedes placing the royalty owner or working interest owner on pay status to begin receiving revenue payments.
DrillingAct of boring a hole through which oil and natural gas may be produced.
Dry WellsA well found to be incapable of producing hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities such that proceeds from the sale of such production exceed production expenses and taxes.


ExplorationThe phase of operations which covers the search for oil and gas generally in unproven or semi-proven territory.
Exploratory DrillingDrilling of a relatively high percentage of properties which are unproven.
Farm OutAn arrangement whereby the owner of a lease assigns all or some portion of the lease or licenses to another company for undertaking exploration or development activity.
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
Fixed Price SwapA derivative instrument that exchanges or “swaps” the “floating” or daily price of a specified volume of oil or natural gas over a specified period, for a fixed price for the specified volume over the same period (typically three months or longer).
Gross AcreThe number of acres in which the Company owns any working interest.
Gross Producing WellA well in which a working interest is owned and is producing oil or gas. The number of gross producing wells is the total number of wells producing oil or gas in which a working interest is owned.
Gross WellA well in which a working interest is owned. The number of gross wells is the total number of wells in which a working interest is owned.
Held-By-Production (HBP)Refers to an oil and gas property under lease, in which the lease continues to be in force, because of production from the property.
Horizontal drillingA drilling technique used in certain formations where a well is drilled vertically to a certain depth and then turned and drilled horizontally. Horizontal drilling allows the wellbore to follow the desired formation.
In-Fill WellsIn-fill wells refers to wells drilled between established producing wells; a drilling program to reduce the spacing between wells in order to increase production and recovery of in-place hydrocarbons.
Oil and Gas LeaseA legal instrument executed by a mineral owner granting the right to another to explore, drill, and produce subsurface oil and gas. An oil and gas lease embodies the legal rights, privileges and duties pertaining to the lessor and lessee.
Lifting CostsThe expenses of producing oil and gas from a well. Lifting costs are the operating costs of the wells including the gathering and separating equipment. Lifting costs do not include the costs of drilling and completing the wells or transporting the oil and gas.
MCFAn abbreviation for one thousand cubic feet of natural gas.
Net AcresDetermined by multiplying gross acres by the working interest that the Company owns in such acres.
Net Producing WellsThe number of producing wells multiplied by the working interest in such wells.
Net Revenue InterestA share of production revenues after all royalties, overriding royalties and other non-operating interests have been taken out of production for a well(s).
OperatorA person, acting for itself, or as an agent for others, designated to conduct the operations on its or the joint interest owners’ behalf.

Overriding RoyaltyOwnership in a percentage of production or production revenues, free of the cost of production, created by the lessee, company and/or working interest owner and paid by the lessee, company and/or working interest owner out of revenue from the well.
Probable ReservesProbable reserves are additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves but which, together with Proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered.


Proved Developed ReservesProved reserves that can be expected to be recovered from existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. This definition of proved developed reserves has been abbreviated from the applicable definitions contained in Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X.
Proved Developed Non-ProducingProved developed reserves expected to be recovered from zones behind casings in existing wells or from future production increases resulting from the effects of water flood operations.
Proved ReservesProved reserves are estimated quantities of crude oil and gas which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic, operating methods, and government regulations prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.
Proved Undeveloped ReservesProved undeveloped reserves are the portion of proved reserves which can be expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled proved acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for completion. This definition of proved undeveloped reserves has been abbreviated from the applicable definitions contained in Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X.
PV10PV10 means the estimated future gross revenue to be generated from the production of proved reserves, net of estimated production and future development and abandonment costs, using prices and costs in effect at the determination date, before income taxes, and without giving effect to non-property related expenses, discounted to a present value using an annual discount rate of 10% in accordance with the guidelines of the SEC. PV10 is a non-GAAP financial measure.  See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Reserves” on page 34 for a reconciliation to the comparable GAAP financial measure.
ReactivationAfter the initial completion of a well, the action and techniques of reentering the well and redoing or repairing the original completion to restore the well’s productivity.
RecompletionCompletion of an existing well for production from one formation or reservoir to another formation or reservoir that exists behind casing of the same well.
ReservoirThe underground rock formation where oil and gas has accumulated. It consists of a porous rock to hold the oil and gas, and a cap rock that prevents its escape.

Secondary RecoveryThe stage of hydrocarbon production during which an external fluid such as water or natural gas is injected into the reservoir through injection wells located in rock that has fluid communication with production wells. The purpose of secondary recovery is to maintain reservoir pressure and to displace hydrocarbons toward the wellbore.  The most common secondary recovery techniques are natural gas injection and water flooding. Normally, natural gas is injected into the natural gas cap and water is injected into the production zone to sweep oil and gas from the reservoir.  A pressure-maintenance program can begin during the primary recovery stage, but it is a form of enhanced recovery.
Stock Tank Barrel or STBA stock tank barrel of oil and gas is the equivalent of 42 U.S. Gallons at 60 degrees Fahrenheit.
Undeveloped AcreageLease acreage on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of commercial quantities of oil and gas regardless of whether such acreage contains proved reserves.
Unitize, UnitizationWhen owners of oil and gas reservoir pool their individual interests in return for an interest in the overall unit.
Water floodThe injection of water into an oil and gas reservoir to “push” additional oil and gas out of the reservoir rock and into the wellbores of producing wells. Typically a secondary recovery process.
Water Injection WellsA well in which fluids are injected rather than produced, the primary objective typically being to maintain or increase reservoir pressure, often pursuant to a water flood.
Water Supply WellsA well in which fluids are being produced for use in a water injection well.

WellboreA borehole; the hole drilled by the bit. A wellbore may have casing in it or it may be open (uncased); or part of it may be cased, and part of it may be open. Also called a borehole or hole.
Working InterestAn interest in an oil and gas lease entitling the owner to receive a specified percentage of the proceeds of the sale of oil and gas production or a percentage of the production, but requiring the owner of the working interest to bear the cost to explore for, develop and produce such oil and gas.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

In the course of conducting our business operations, we are exposed to a variety of risks that are inherent to the oil and gas industry. The following discusses some of the key inherent risk factors that could affect our business and operations. Other factors besides those discussed below or elsewhere in this report also could adversely affect our business and operations, and these risk factors should not be considered a complete list of potential risks that may affect us.

For risk factors regarding AgEagle, its business operations and financial results, which will become our business operations and financial results following the consummation of the Merger, see the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC on October 20, 2017.

Risks Related to Recent Developments

Due to our substantial liquidity concerns, we may be unable to continue as a going concern.

On October 19, 2017, EnerJex entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“AgEagle”), which designs, develops, produces, and distributes technologically advanced small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV or drones) that are supplied to the agriculture industry, and AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”). Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will be merged with and into AgEagle, Merger Sub will cease to exist and AgEagle will survive as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”). The respective boards of directors of EnerJex and AgEagle have approved the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.

At the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), the shares of AgEagle capital stock will be automatically converted into the right to receive equal to 85% of the then issued and outstanding capital stock of the Company on a fully diluted basis. In addition, at the Effective Time all outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares of AgEagle common stock will be assumed by the Company and converted into options and warrants to purchase shares of Company common stock. No fractional shares of Company common stock will be issued in the Merger but will be rounded to the nearest whole share. Following the consummation of the Merger, former stockholders of AgEagle with respect to the Merger are expected to own 85% of the Company’s outstanding common stock (inclusive of the AgEagle assumed stock options and warrants), and current common and Series A Preferred stockholders of the Company are expected to own 15% of the Company, excluding shares of common stock that may be issued in connection with the conversion of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock, and not including any additional shares which may be issued in connection with the Company’s closing obligation to provide up to $4 million in new working capital and the elimination of all liabilities currently on the Company’s balance sheet.

In connection with the Merger, the Company will also file a proxy statement seeking stockholder approval to: (a) amend the terms of its Series A Preferred Stock (as discussed below); (b) approve the issuance of the Company’s shares in connection with the Merger to the AgEagle shareholders and new investors, in excess of 19.9% of the Company’s total issued and outstanding shares of common stock; (c) approve the issuance of shares to current Company management and directors in lieu of deferred salary and fees, a majority of which will be held in escrow to secure the Company’s indemnity obligations under the Merger Agreement; and (d) change the name of the Company to “AgEagle Aerial Resources, Inc.” 

The Merger Agreement provides that, immediately following the Effective Time, the existing board of directors and officers of the Company will resign and new directors and officers will be appointed by AgEagle.

The Company intends to dispose of its principal assets, consisting primarily of its Kansas oil and gas properties, concurrently with the closing of the Merger.future. In the event the Merger is not consummated, the Company does not have a present intention to dispose of the above described assets.

 17

The completion of the Merger is subject to various customary conditions, including, among other things: (a) the approval of the stockholders of the Company and AgEagle (which Company shareholder approval has been received to date); (b) the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by each of the Company and AgEagle and the compliance by each of the Company and AgEagle with their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement; (c) approval of the stockholders of the Company for the issuance of its common stock and any other securities (x) to the AgEagle stockholders in connection with the Merger and (y) in connection with the financing transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; (d) approval for the listing ofthat these convertible instruments are converted into shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued in the Merger andoutstanding Common Stock, or that we make additional issuances of other related transactions on the NYSE American; and (e) that all of the Company’s assets as disclosed shall have been sold, transferredconvertible or otherwise disposed of and the corresponding debt and liabilities shall have been extinguished. The Company’s existing cash resources are insufficient to satisfy all of its outstanding liabilities. Accordingly, in order to satisfy the condition and consummate the Merger, the Company will be required to raiseexchangeable securities, you could experience additional funding prior to the closing of the Merger, the failure of which could result in the Company’s failure to consummate the Merger Agreement.

The Merger Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, including covenants obligating each of the Company and AgEagle to continue to conduct its respective business in the ordinary course, to provide reasonable access to each other’s information and to use reasonable best efforts to cooperate and coordinate to make any filings or submissions that are required to be made under any applicable laws or requested to be made by any government authority in connection with the Merger. The Merger Agreement also contains a customary “no solicitation” provision pursuant to which, prior to the earlier of January 31, 2018, or the completion or termination of the Merger, neither the Company nor AgEagle may solicit or engage in discussions with any third party regarding another acquisition proposal unless, in the Company’s case, it has received an unsolicited, bona fide written proposal that the recipient’s board of directors determines is or would reasonably be expected to result in a superior proposal. The Company has paid AgEagle a $50,000 non-refundable fee at the signing of the Merger Agreement. The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights in favor of each of the Company and AgEagle.

In addition, the Merger Agreement contains provisions for indemnification in the event of any damages suffered by either party as a result of breaches of representations and warranties contained therein. The aggregate maximum indemnification obligation of any indemnifying party for damages with respect to breaches of representations and warranties set forth in the Merger Agreement shall not exceed, in the aggregate, $350,000, other than fraud, intentional misrepresentation or willful breach. An indemnifying party shall satisfy its indemnification obligations with shares of Company common stock equal to the aggregate amount of losses of the indemnified party, calculated based upon the greater of (i) the value of the Company common stock as of the closing of the Merger; and (ii) the average closing price of the Company common stock on the NYSE American for the five trading days immediately prior to the date such a claim is made. The Company has agreed to deposit an aggregate of 1,215,278 shares of common stock to be issued to current officers and directors of the Company in lieu of deferred salary and fees into escrow to secure its indemnification obligations, the issuance of such shares requiring the approval of the Company’s common stockholders.

In connection with, and as a condition to the closing of the Merger, the Company is seeking the consent of the holder of its Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) to amend the terms thereof to: (i) allow the Company to pay all accrued but unpaid dividends up to September 30, 2017 in additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock based on the value of the liquidation preference thereof, (ii) eliminate the right of the Series A Preferred Stock holders to receive any dividends accruing after September 30, 2017, and (iii) convert each share of Series A Preferred Stock into 10 shares of Company common stock. An affirmative vote of 66.7% of all shares of Series A Preferred Stock voting as a class as of the record date of the proxy statement is required to amend the terms of the Certificate of Designation to provide for these changes, as required under the Merger Agreement. As of September 30, 2017, the Series A Preferred Stock had accrued a total of $6,039,972 in accrued but unpaid dividends, which would result in an additional 241,599 shares of Series A Preferred Stock being issued by the Company to satisfy these accrued dividends.

The Merger Agreement provides either party the right to terminate the Merger if it has not been consummated by January 31, 2018, provided that if all of the conditions to closing shall have been satisfied or shall be capable of being satisfied at such time, the required closing date may be extended until March 31, 2018. On January 31, 2018, the Company extended the required closing date with AgEagle to March 31, 2018.

Shoulddilution. Furthermore, we not be able to close this transaction, our existing and future debt agreements become due and that will threaten our ability to continue as a going concern. The Company will seek to negotiate an extension of such indebtedness or may seek bankruptcy protection if this transaction is not approved by the shareholders.

In the event the Merger closes, it will cause immediate and substantial dilution to existing shareholders and a change of control of the Company.

As described above, we are party to a Merger Agreement with AgEagle relating to the acquisition by us of the outstanding securities of AgEagle.  We anticipate the consideration exchanged with AgEagle for the securities of AgEagle will be 85% of our total outstanding securities on a fully-diluted basis.  Additionally, we anticipate issuing other securities in connection with the Merger, including, but not limited to, in order to raise funding in connection therewith. As such, in the event the contemplated transaction closes, the issuance of the common stock consideration to AgEagle and to other parties will result in immediate and substantial dilution to the interests of our then shareholders and result in a change of control of the Company.

 18

The Merger Agreement limits our ability to pursue alternatives to the Merger.

The Merger Agreement contains provisions that could adversely impact competing proposals to acquire us. These provisions include the prohibition on us generally from soliciting any acquisition proposal or offer for a competing transaction. These provisions might discourage a third party that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of our company from considering or proposing an acquisition, even if that party were prepared to pay consideration with a higher value than the current proposed Merger consideration.

Failure to complete the Merger could negatively impact our stock price and future business and financial results.

If the Merger is not completed, our ongoing business may be adversely affected and we would be subject to a number of risks, including the following:

we will not realize the benefits expected from the Merger, including a potentially enhanced competitive and financial position, expansion of operations, and will instead be subject to all the risks we currently face as an independent company;
we may experience negative reactions from the financial markets and our partners and employees;
the Merger Agreement places certain restrictions on the conduct of our business prior to the completion of the Merger or the termination of the Merger Agreement. Such restrictions, the waiver of which is subject to the consent of AgEagle, may prevent us from making certain acquisitions, taking certain other specified actions or otherwise pursuing business opportunities during the pendency of the Merger; and
matters relating to the Merger (including integration planning) may require substantial commitments of time and resources by our management, which would otherwise have been devoted to other opportunities that may have been beneficial to us as an independent company.

The Merger Agreement may be terminated in accordance with its terms and the Merger may not be completed.

The completion of the Merger is subject to various customary conditions, including, among other things: (a) the approval of the shareholders of the Company and AgEagle (which Company shareholder approval has been received to date); (b) the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by each of the Company and AgEagle and the compliance by each of the Company and AgEagle with their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement; (c) approval of the shareholders of the Company for the issuance of its common stock and any other securities (x) to the AgEagle shareholders in connection with the Merger and (y) in connection with the financing transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; (d) approval for the listing of shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued in the Merger and other related transactions on the NYSE American; and (e) that all of the Company’s assets as disclosed shall have been sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of and the corresponding debt and liabilities shall have been extinguished. The Company’s existing cash resources are insufficient to satisfy all of its outstanding liabilities. Accordingly, in order to satisfy the condition and consummate the Merger, the Company will be required to raise additional funding prior to the closing of the Merger, the failure of which could result in the Company’s failure to consummate the Merger Agreement. These conditions to the closing of the Merger may not be fulfilled and, accordingly, the Merger may not be completed. In addition, if the Merger is not completed by March 31, 2018, either we or AgEagle may choose not to proceed with the Merger, and the parties can mutually decide to terminate the Merger Agreement at any time, before or after shareholder approval. In addition, we or AgEagle may elect to terminate the Merger Agreement in certain other circumstances.

Termination of the Merger Agreement could negatively impact the Company.

In the event the Merger Agreement is terminated, our business may have been adversely impacted by our failure to pursue other beneficial opportunities due to the focus of management on the Merger, and the market price of our common stock might decline to the extent that the current market price reflects a market assumption that the Merger will be completed. If the Merger Agreement is terminated and our board of directors seek another business combination, our shareholders cannot be certainassure you that we will be able to findissue shares or other securities in any other offering at a party willingprice per share that is equal to offer equivalent or more attractive considerationgreater than the consideration provided forprice per share paid by investors or the Merger. then current market price.

 

We will be subjectFINRA sales practice requirements may limit a stockholder’s ability to business uncertaintiesbuy and contractual restrictions while the Merger is pending.sell our securities.

 

UncertaintyThe Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) has adopted rules that a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that an investment recommended to a customer is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low-priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives, and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low-priced securities will not be suitable for certain customers. FINRA requirements will likely make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our Common Stock, which may have the effect of reducing the Merger onlevel of trading activity in the shares, resulting in fewer broker-dealers may be willing to make a market in our partners may have an adverse effect on us. These uncertainties may impair ourshares, potentially reducing a stockholder’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel until the Merger is completed, and could cause partners and others that deal with us to seek to change existing business relationships, cease doing business with usresell our securities.

If securities or cause potential new partners to delay doing business with us until the Merger has been successfully completed. Retention of certain employees may be challenging during the pendency of the Merger, as certain employees may experience uncertaintyindustry analysts do not publish research or reports about their future roles or compensation structure. If key employees depart because of issues relating to the uncertainty and difficulty of integration or a desire not to remain with the business, our business, followingif they adversely change their recommendations regarding our shares or if our results of operations do not meet their expectations, the Merger could be negatively impacted. In addition, the Merger Agreement restricts us from making certain acquisitions and taking other specified actions until the Merger is completed or terminated without the consent of AgEagle. These restrictions may prevent us from pursuing attractive business opportunities that may arise prior to the completion of the Merger.

 19

We have substantial indebtedness which is secured by substantially allprice of our assets.securities and trading volume could decline.

Our subsidiaries’ obligations under the credit agreement and note are non-recourse and are secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s and the subsidiaries’ oil properties and assets located in Kansas. The Company was removed as a borrower under the Credit Agreement, but entered into a Guaranty of Recourse Carveouts, pursuant to which the Company guarantees the Subsidiaries’ payment of certain fees and expenses due under the Credit Agreement, and may be liable for certain conduct, such as fraud, bad faith, gross negligence, and waste of the Kansas oil properties or assets. In the event we fail to repay our debts our creditors may enforce their security interests and foreclose on our assets, which would likely cause any investment in the company to become worthless.

Current volatile market conditions and significant fluctuations in energy prices may continue indefinitely, negatively affecting our business prospects and viability.

 

The oil and gas markets are very volatile, and we cannot predict future oil and natural gas prices. Historically, oil and natural gas prices have been volatile and are subject to fluctuations in response to changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. Further declines in the price of oil and natural gas will have a material adverse effect on our planned operations and financial condition. Additionally, the amount of any royalty payment we receive from the production of oil and gas from our oil and gas interests will depend on numerous factors beyond our control.

We are subject to the Continued Listing Criteria of the NYSE American and our failure to satisfy these criteria may result in delisting of our common stock.

Our common stock is currently listed on the NYSE American. In order to maintain this listing, we must maintain certain share prices, financial and share distribution targets, including maintaining a minimum amount of shareholders’ equity and a minimum number of public shareholders. In addition to these objective standards, the NYSE American may delist the securities of any issuer if, in its opinion, the issuer’s financial condition and/or operating results appear unsatisfactory; if it appears that the extent of public distribution or the aggregate market value of the security has become so reduced as to make continued listing on the NYSE American inadvisable; if the issuer sells or disposes of principal operating assets or ceases to be an operating company; if an issuer fails to comply with the NYSE American’s listing requirements; if an issuer’s common stock sells at what the NYSE American considers a “low selling price” (generally trading below $0.20 per share for an extended period of time) and the issuer fails to correct this via a reverse split of shares after notification by the NYSE American (provided that issuers can also be delisted if any shares of the issuer trade below $0.06 per share); or if any other event occurs or any condition exists which makes continued listing on the NYSE American, in its opinion, inadvisable. As described below, the NYSE American has previously provided us a deficiency letter due to our common stock trading below $0.20 per share.

If the NYSE American delists our common stock, investors may face material adverse consequences, including, but not limited to, a lack of trading market for our securities reduced liquidity, decreased analystwill be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of these analyst’s cease coverage of our securities, and an inability for uscompany or fail to obtain additional financing to fund our operations.

We are currently not in compliance with NYSE American continued listing standards and if we are unable to maintain compliance with NYSE American continued listing standards, our common stock may be delisted from the NYSE American equities market, which would likely cause the liquidity and market price of our common stock to decline.

Our common stock is currently listed on the NYSE American. The NYSE American will consider suspending dealings in, or delisting, securities of an issuer that does not meet its continued listing standards. If we cannot meet the NYSE American continued listing requirements, the NYSE American may delist our common stock, which could have an adverse impactpublish reports on us and the liquidity and market price of our stock. 

We may be unable to comply with NYSE American continued listing standards. Our business has been and may continue to be affected by worldwide macroeconomic factors, which include uncertaintiesregularly, we could lose visibility in the credit and capital markets. External factors that affect our stock price, such as liquidity requirements of our investors, as well as our performance, could impact our market capitalization, revenue and operating results,financial markets, which in turn could affectcause our abilityshare price or trading volume to comply withdecline. Moreover, if one or more of the NYSE American’s listing standards. The NYSE American has the ability to suspend trading inanalysts who cover us downgrade our common stock, or removeif our common stock from listing on the NYSE American if in the opinion of the exchange: (a) the financial condition and/or operating results of operations do not meet their expectations, the Company appear to be unsatisfactory; or (b) it appears that the extent of public distribution or the aggregate market valueprice of our common stock has become so reduced as to make further dealings on the exchange inadvisable; or (c) we have sold or otherwise disposed of our principal operating assets, or have ceased to be an operating company; or (d) we have failed to comply with our listing agreements with the exchange (which include that we receive additional listing approval from the exchange prior to us issuing any shares of common stock, something we have inadvertently failed to comply with in the past); or (e) any other event shall occur or any condition shall exist which makes further dealings on the exchange unwarranted.securities could decline.

 

 20ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

On October 19, 2017, the Company received notice from NYSE Regulation, Inc. that it is not in compliance with certain NYSE American (“NYSE American”) continued listing standards relating to stockholders’ equity. Specifically, the Company is not in compliance with Section 1003(a)(i) (requiring stockholders’ equity of $2.0 million or more if an issuer has reported losses from continuing operations and/or net losses in two of its three most recent fiscal years) of the NYSE American Company Guide (the “Company Guide”).

On November 20, 2017, the Company filed a plan of compliance with the proposed steps the Company will take to regain compliance with all applicable criteria for listing on the NYSE American and in particular Section 1003(a)(i). The plan was based in significant part upon the Merger and the associated financing.

On December 22, 2017, the Company was notified by the NYSE American that NYSE Regulation had accepted the Company’s plan to regain compliance with the NYSE American’s continued listing standards of the Company Guide by April 17, 2019, subject to periodic review by the NYSE American for compliance with the initiatives set forth in the plan. If the Company is not in compliance with the continued listing standards by April 17, 2019, or if the Company does not make progress consistent with the plan during the plan period, the NYSE Regulation staff may initiate delisting proceedings as appropriate.

Additionally, on February 28, 2018, the Company received notification (the “Deficiency Letter”) from the NYSE American that the Company’s shares of common stock have been selling for a low price per share for a substantial period of time. Pursuant to Section 1003(f)(v) of the Company Guide, the NYSE American staff determined that the Company’s continued listing is predicated on it effecting a reverse stock split of its common stock or otherwise demonstrating sustained price improvement within a reasonable period of time, which the staff determined to be until August 28, 2018. The Company’s common stock will continue to be listed on the NYSE American while it attempts to regain compliance with the Listing Standards, subject to the Company’s compliance with other continued listing requirements, as described above. The Deficiency Letter does not affect the Company’s business operations or its Securities and Exchange Commission reporting requirements. 

At the present time, the Company has obtained shareholder approval to effectuate a reverse stock split at a ratio of between one-for-two and one-for-twenty five with such ratio to be determined at the sole discretion of the Board of the Directors of the Company. The Company’s Board of Directors is currently assessing which ratio would best serve the Company’s stockholders while allowing the Company to remain compliant with the NYSE American continued listing requirements.

If we are unable to retain compliance with the NYSE American criteria for continued listing, our common stock would be subject to delisting. A delisting of our common stock could negatively impact us by, among other things, reducing the liquidity and market price of our common stock and reducing the number of investors willing to hold or acquire our common stock, which could negatively impact our ability to raise equity financing. In addition, delisting from the NYSE American might negatively impact our reputation and, as a consequence, our business. Additionally, if we were delisted from the NYSE American and we are not able to list our common stock on another national exchange we will no longer be eligible to use Form S-3 registration statements and will instead be required to file a Form S-1 registration statement for any primary or secondary offerings of our common stock, which would delay our ability to raise funds in the future, may limit the type of offerings of common stock we could undertake, and would increase the expenses of any offering, as, among other things, registration statements on Form S-1 are subject to SEC review and comments whereas take downs pursuant to a previously filed Form S-3 are not.

If we are delisted from the NYSE American, your ability to sell your shares of our common stock would also be limited by the penny stock restrictions, which could further limit the marketability of your shares.

If our common stock is delisted from the NYSE American, it would come within the definition of “penny stock” as defined in the Exchange Act and would be covered by Rule 15g-9 of the Exchange Act. That Rule imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. For transactions covered by Rule 15g-9, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction prior to the sale. Consequently, Rule 15g-9, if it were to become applicable, would affect the ability or willingness of broker-dealers to sell our securities, and accordingly would affect the ability of shareholders to sell their securities in the public market. These additional procedures could also limit our ability to raise additional capital in the future.

Until we repay the full amount of our outstanding credit facility, we may continue to have substantial indebtedness, which is secured by substantially all of our assets.  

While our bank sold its rights under our credit facility to the successor lender, and the successor lender has agreed to a transaction in which we can contribute certain of our assets, our shares in Oakridge Energy, and reduce our loan amount from $17,925,000 to a restated note in the original principal amount of $4,500,000, subject to a $1,200,000 discount provided that we repay the successor lender $3,300,000 prior to the original maturity date of November 1, 2017, which has been extended to March 23, 2018 and can be extended to April 30, 2018. In exchange we can retain our Kansas oil and gas assets. Unless and until this transaction closes (which is dependent on the approval of our stockholders), we will remain in default on our obligations, and the successor lender may enforce its rights as secured parties and we will likely lose all of our Kansas assets and may be forced to liquidate the Company.Not applicable.

 

 21ITEM 2.PROPERTIES

 

We are unable to fulfill our obligations under our credit facility which is adversely affecting our business.

As of December 31, 2017, we had total indebtedness of $4,457,347 under2021, the credit facility. Our substantial indebtedness,Company is a party to the following non-cancellable operating leases for manufacturing facilities and the related interest expense, could have important consequences to us, including:office space:

 

our ability to borrow additional amounts for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, execution

LocationPurposeInitial Term 
(months)
Lease Expiration Date
8863 E. 34th Street, North Wichita, KansasManufacturing Facility &  Corporate Headquarters36October 31, 2023
Route de Genève 38  1033 Cheseaux-sur-Lausanne, SwitzerlandDistribution & Assembly Facility & Offices60April 30, 2023
10107 Division Drive  Raleigh, North CarolinaOffices60December 31, 2022
600 Congress Avenue  Austin, TexasOffices17December 31, 2022
1701 Rhode Island Avenue NW  Washington, DCOffices15December 31, 2022
1300 N. Northlake Way  Seattle, WashingtonOffices60January 2026

As of our business strategy, or other general corporate purposes;

being forced to use cash flow to reduce our outstanding balanceDecember 31, 2021, the Company held properties in Lausanne, Switzerland; Raleigh, NC; Austin, TX; Washington, DC; Seattle, WA represent non-cancelable lease obligations assumed by the Company as a result of an unfavorable borrowing base redetermination;
our ability to use operating cash flow in other areasits 2021 business acquisitions of our business because we must dedicate a substantial portion of these funds to service our indebtedness;
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economicsenseFly S.A., senseFly Inc. Measure Global Inc, and industry conditions;
placing us at a competitive disadvantage as compared to our competitors that have less leverage;
our ability to capitalize on business opportunities and to react to competitive pressures and changes in government regulation;
our ability to, or increasing the cost of, refinancing our indebtedness; and
our ability to enter into marketing, hedging, optimization and trading transactions by reducing the number of counterparties with whom we can enter into such transactions as well as the volume of those transactions.

The covenants in our Credit Facility impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us.

The credit facility imposes significant operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions limit our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries, among other things, to:

incur additional indebtedness and provide additional guarantees;
pay dividends and make other restricted payments;
create or permit certain liens;
use the proceeds from the sales of our oil and gas properties;
use the proceeds from the unwinding of certain financial hedges;
engage in certain transactions with affiliates; and
consolidate, merge, sell or transfer all or substantially all of our assets or the assets of our subsidiaries.

The credit facility also contains various affirmative covenants with which we are required to comply. At December 31, 2017, we were not in compliance with certain covenants. The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018 and has an option to extend the maturity date of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.    

Our 2017 oil and gas reserve report shows a material decline in our estimated reserves, which will have adverse implications to our business.

Our 2017 oil and gas reserve report shows a material decline in our estimated reserves. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved oil and natural gas reserves and in projecting future rates of production and timing of development expenditures, including many factors beyond our control. For example, estimates of quantities of proved reserves and their PV10 value are affected by changes in crude oil and gas prices, because estimates are based on prevailing prices at the time of their determination. Further, reserve engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in any exact way, and the accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. As a result, estimates made by different engineers often vary from one another.

Current volatile market conditions and significant fluctuations in energy prices may continue indefinitely, negatively affecting our business prospects and viability.

The oil and gas markets are very volatile, and we cannot predict future oil and natural gas prices. Historically, oil and natural gas prices have been volatile and are subject to fluctuations in response to changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. Further declines in the price of oil and natural gas will have a material adverse effect on our planned operations and financial condition. Additionally, the amount of any royalty payment we receive from the production of oil and gas from our oil and gas interests will depend on numerous factors beyond our control.MicaSense, Inc., respectively.

 


 22ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We may continue to incur substantial write-downs of the carrying value of our oil and gas properties, which would adversely impact our earnings.

 

We review the carrying value of our oilLegal Proceedings

From time to time, we may become involved in lawsuits and gas properties under the full cost method of accounting. Under the full cost method of accounting, the net book value of oil and gas properties, less deferred income taxes, may not exceed a calculated “ceiling.” The ceiling limitation is (a) the present value of future net revenues computed by applying current prices of oil & gas reserves (with consideration of price changes only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to estimated future production of proved oil & gas reserves as of the date of the latest balance sheet presented, less estimated future expenditures (based on current costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves computed using a discount factor of 10 percent and assuming continuation of existing economic conditionsplus (b) the cost of properties not being amortizedplus (c) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties includedlegal proceedings which arise in the costs being amortizedless (d) income tax effects relatedordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to differences between book and tax basis of properties. Future cash outflows associated with settling accrued retirement obligations are excluded from the calculation. Estimated future cash flows are calculated using end-of-period costsinherent uncertainties, and an un-weighted arithmetic average of commodity prices in effect on the first day of each of the previous 12 months held flat for the life of the production, except where prices are defined by contractual arrangements. 

Any excess of the net book value of proved oil and gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, over the ceiling is charged to expense and reflected as additional depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) in the statement of operations. The ceiling calculation is performed quarterly. For the year ended December 31, 2017, no impairment charges were recorded.

Future conditions might require us to make write-downs in our assets, which would adversely affect our balance sheet and results of operations.

We review our long-lived tangible and intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. We also test our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually on December 31 of each year, or when events or changes in the business environment indicate that the carrying value of a reporting unit may exceed its fair value. If conditions in any of the businesses in which we compete were to deteriorate, we could determine that certain of our assets were impaired and we would then be required to write-off all or a portion of our costs for such assets. Any such significant write-offs would adversely affect our balance sheet and results of operations.

Risks Associated with our Industry

Oil and gas prices are volatile. Future price volatility may negatively impact cash flows which couldadverse result in an inability to cover our operating and/or capital expenditures.

Our future revenues, profitability, future growth and the carrying value of our properties depend substantially on the prices we realize for our oil and gas production. Our realized prices may also affect the amount of cash flow available for operating and/or capital expenditures and our ability to borrow and raise additional capital.

Oil and gas prices are subject to wide fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in or perceptions regarding supply and demand. Historically, the markets for oil and gas have been volatile, and they are likely to continue to be volatile in the future. Among the factors that can cause this volatility are:

commodities speculators;
local, national and worldwide economic conditions;
worldwide or regional demand for energy, which is affected by economic conditions;
the domestic and foreign supply of oil and gas;
weather conditions;
natural disasters;
acts of terrorism and war;
domestic and foreign governmental regulations and taxation;
political and economic conditions in oil and gas producing countries, including those in the Middle East and South America;
impact of the U.S. dollar exchange rates on oil and gas prices;
the availability of refining capacity;
actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC, and other state controlled oil and gas companies relating to oil and gas price and production controls; and
the price and availability of other fuels.

It is impossible to predict oil and gas price movements with certainty. A drop in oil and gas prices may not only decrease our future revenues on a per unit basis but also may reduce the amount of oil and gas that we can produce economically. A substantial or extended decline in oil and gas prices would materially and adversely affect our future business enough to potentially force us to cease our business operations. In addition, our reserves, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to finance and execute planned capital expenditures will also suffer in such a price decline.

 23

Declining economic conditions and worsening geopolitical conditions could negatively impact our business.

Our operations are affected by local, national and worldwide economic conditions. Markets in the United States and elsewhere have been experiencing volatility and disruption for more than 5 years, due in part to the financial stresses affecting the liquidity of the banking system and the financial markets generally. The consequences of a potential or prolonged recession may include a lower level of economic activity, decreasing demand for petroleum products and uncertainty regarding energy prices and the capital and commodity markets.

In addition, actual and attempted terrorist attacks in the United States, Middle East, Southeast Asia and Europe, and war or armed hostilities in the Middle East, the Persian Gulf, North Africa, Iran, North Korea or elsewhere, or the fear of such events, could further exacerbate the volatility and disruption to the financial markets and economies.

While the ultimate outcome and impact of the current economic conditions cannot be predicted, a lower level of economic activity might result in a decline in energy consumption, which may materially adversely affect the price of oil and gas, our revenues, liquidity and future growth.  Instability in the financial markets, as a result of recession or otherwise, also may affect the cost of capital and our ability to raise capital. 

The threat and impact of terrorist attacks, cyber attacks or similar hostilities may adversely impact our operations.

We cannot assess the extent of either the threat or the potential impact of future terrorist attacks on the energy industry in general, and on us in particular, either in the short-term or in the long-term. Uncertainty surrounding such hostilities may affect our operations in unpredictable ways, including the possibility that infrastructure facilities, including pipelines and gathering systems, production facilities, processing plants and refineries, could be targets of, or indirect casualties of, an act of terror, a cyber attack or electronic security breach, or an act of war.

Improvements in or new discoveries of alternative energy technologies could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Because our operations depend on the demand for oil and used oil, any improvement in or new discoveries of alternative energy technologies (such as wind, solar, geothermal, fuel cells and biofuels) that increase the use of alternative forms of energy and reduce the demand for oil, gas and oil and gas related products could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The oil and natural gas business involves numerous uncertainties and operating risks that can prevent us from realizing profits and can cause substantial losses.

Our development, exploitation and exploration activities may be unsuccessful for many reasons, including weather, cost overruns, equipment shortages and mechanical difficulties. Moreover, the successful drilling of a well does not ensure a profit on investment. A variety of factors, both geological and market-related, can cause a well to become uneconomical or only marginally economical. In addition to their cost, unsuccessful wells can hurt our efforts to replace reserves.

The oil and natural gas business involves a variety of operating risks, including:

unexpected operational events and/or conditions;
reductions in oil and natural gas prices;
limitations in the market for oil and natural gas;
adverse weather conditions;
facility or equipment malfunctions;
title problems;
oil and gas quality issues;
pipe, casing, cement or pipeline failures;
natural disasters;
fires, explosions, blowouts, surface cratering, pollution and other risks or accidents;
environmental hazards, such as oil spills, pipeline ruptures and discharges of toxic gases;
compliance with environmental and other governmental requirements; and
uncontrollable flows of oil or natural gas or well fluids.

If we experience any of these problems, it could affect well bores, gathering systems and processing facilities, which could adversely affect our ability to conduct operations. We could also incur substantial losses as a result of:

injury or loss of life;

 24

severe damage to and destruction of property, natural resources and equipment;
pollution and other environmental damage;
clean-up responsibilities;
regulatory investigation and penalties;
suspension of our operations; and
repairs to resume operations.

Because we use third-party drilling contractors to drill our wells, we may not realize the full benefit of worker compensation laws in dealing with their employees. Our insurance does not protect us against all operational risks. We do not carry business interruption insurance at levels that would provide enough funds for us to continue operating without access to other funds. For some risks, we may not obtain insurance if we believe the cost of available insurance is excessive relative to the risks presented. In addition, pollution and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. If a significant accident or other event occurs and is not fully covered by insurance, it could impact our operations enough to force us to cease our operations.

Approximately 85.3% of our total proved reserves as of December 31, 2017 consist of undeveloped reserves, and those reservesmatters may not ultimately be developed or produced.

Our estimated total proved PV10 (present value) before tax of reserves as of December 31, 2017 was $1.5 million, versus $3.4 million as of December 31, 2016.  Of the 0.5 million BOE of total proved reserves, approximately 14.7% are classified as proved developed producing and approximately 85.3% are classified as proved undeveloped.

Assuming we can obtain adequate capital resources, we plan to develop and produce all of our proved reserves, but ultimately some of these reserves may not be developed or produced. Furthermore, not all of our undeveloped or developed non-producing reserves may be produced in the time periods we have planned, at the costs we have budgeted, or at all. For further information please see the disclosures in “Note 14 - Supplemental Oil and Gas Reserve Information (Unaudited)” to the Financial Statements included herein.

Because we face uncertainties in estimating proved recoverable reserves, you should not place undue reliance on such reserve information.

Our reserve estimates and the future net cash flows attributable to those reserves at December 31, 2017 were prepared by Cobb & Associates, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant.  There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved reserves and cash flows from such reserves, including factors beyond our control and the control of these independent consultants and engineers. Reserve engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and gas that can be economically extracted, which cannot be measured in an exact manner. The accuracy of an estimate of quantities of reserves, or of cash flows attributable to these reserves, is a function of the available data, assumptions regarding future oil and gas prices, expenditures for future development and exploitation activities, and engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Reserves and future cash flows may also be subject to material downward or upward revisions based upon production history, development and exploitation activities and oil and gas prices. Actual future production, revenue, taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses, quantities of recoverable reserves and value of cash flows from those reserves may vary significantly from the assumptions and estimates in our reserve reports. Any significant variance from these assumptions to actual figures could greatly affect our estimates of reserves, the economically recoverable quantities of oil and gas attributable to any particular group of properties, the classification of reserves based on risk of recovery, and estimates of the future net cash flows. In addition, reserve engineers may make different estimates of reserves and cash flows based on the same available data. The estimated quantities of proved reserves and the discounted present value of future net cash flows attributable to those reserves included in this report were prepared by Cobb & Associates, Inc. in accordance with rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and are not intended to represent the fair market value of such reserves.

The present value of future net cash flows from our proved reserves is not necessarily the same as the current market value of our estimated reserves. We base the estimated discounted future net cash flows from our proved reserves on prices and costs. However, actual future net cash flows from our oil and gas properties also will be affected by factors such as:

geological conditions;
assumptions governing future oil and gas prices;
amount and timing of actual production;
availability of funds;
future operating and development costs;
actual prices we receive for oil and gas;
changes in government regulations and taxation; and
capital costs of drilling new wells

 25

The timing of both our production and our incurrence of expenses in connection with the development and production of our properties will affect the timing of actual future net cash flows from proved reserves, and thus their actual present value. In addition, the 10% discount factor we use when calculating discounted future net cash flows may not be the most appropriate discount factor based on interest rates in effectarise from time to time and risks associated with our business or the oil and gas industry in general.

The differential between the New York Mercantile Exchange, or NYMEX, or other benchmark price of oil and gas and the wellhead price we receive could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

The prices that we receive for our oil production in Texas, Colorado and Kansas are typically based on a discount to the relevant benchmark prices, such as NYMEX, that are used for calculating hedge positions. The prices we receive for our natural gas production in Colorado is based upon local market conditions but generally we receive a discount to Henry Hub. The difference between the benchmark price and the price we receive is called a differential.  We cannot accurately predict oil and gas differentials. In recent years for example, production increases from competing North American producers, in conjunction with limited refining and pipeline capacity have widened this differential. Recent economic conditions, including volatility in the price of oil and gas, have resulted in both increases and decreases in the differential between the benchmark price for oil and gas and the wellhead price we receive.  These fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows by decreasing the proceeds we receive for our oil and gas production in comparison to what we would receive if not for the differential.  

Drilling wells is speculative, and any material inaccuracies in our forecasted drilling costs, estimates or underlying assumptions will materially affectmay harm our business.

Developing Although we currently maintain liability insurance coverage intended to cover professional liability and exploring for oil and gas involves a high degree of operational and financial risk, which precludes definitive statements as to the time required and costs involved in reaching certain objectives. The budgeted costs of drilling, completing and operating wells are often exceeded and can increase significantly when drilling costs rise due to a tightening in the supply of various types of oil and gas field equipment and related services. Drilling may be unsuccessful for many reasons, including geological conditions, weather, cost overruns, equipment shortages and mechanical difficulties. Moreover, the successful drilling of an oil and gas well does not ensure a profit on investment. Exploratory wells bear a much greater risk of loss than development wells. A variety of factors, both geological and market-related, can cause a well to become uneconomical or only marginally economic. Our initial drilling and development sites, and any potential additional sitesother claims, we cannot assure that may be developed, require significant additional exploration and development, regulatory approval and commitments of resources prior to commercial development. If our actual drilling and development costs are significantly more than our estimated costs, we may not be able to continue our business operations as proposed and would be forced to modify our plan of operation.

Development of our reserves, when established, may not occur as scheduled and the actual results may not be as anticipated. Drilling activity and lack of access to economically acceptable capital may result in downward adjustments in reserves or higher than anticipated costs. Our estimatesinsurance coverage will be based on various assumptions, including assumptions over which we have control and assumptions required by the SEC relatingadequate to oil and gas prices, drilling and operating expenses, capital expenditures, taxes and availabilitycover liabilities arising out of funds. We have control over our operations that affect, among other things, acquisitions and dispositions of properties, availability of funds, use of applicable technologies, hydrocarbon recovery efficiency, drainage volume and production decline rates that are part of these estimates and assumptions and any variance in our operations that affects these items within our control may have a material effect on reserves.  The process of estimating our oil and gas reserves is extremely complex, and requires significant decisions and assumptions in the evaluation of available geological, geophysical, engineering and economic data for each reservoir. Our estimates may not be reliable enough to allowclaims asserted against us to be successful in our intended business operations. Our actual production, revenues, taxes, development expenditures and operating expenses will likely vary from those anticipated. These variances may be material.

Unless we replace our oil and gas reserves, our reserves and production will decline, which would adversely affect our cash flows and income.

Unless we conduct successful development, exploitation and exploration activities or acquire properties containing proved reserves, our proved reserves will decline as those reserves are produced. Producing oil and gas reservoirs generally are characterized by declining production rates that vary depending upon reservoir characteristics and other factors. Our future oil and gas production, and, therefore our cash flow and income, are highly dependent on our success in efficiently developing and exploiting our current reserves and economically finding or acquiring additional recoverable reserves. We may be unable to make such acquisitions because we are:

unable to identify attractive acquisition candidates or negotiate acceptable purchase contracts with them;
unable to obtain financing for these acquisitions on economically acceptable terms; or
outbid by competitors.

If we are unable to develop, exploit, find or acquire additional reserves to replace our current and future production, our cash flow and income will decline as production declines, until our existing properties would be incapable of sustaining commercial production.

 26

In order to exploit successfully our current oil and gas leases and others that we acquire in the future we will needwhere the outcomes of such claims are unfavorable to generate significant amounts of capital.

The oil and gas exploration, development and production business is a capital-intensive undertaking. In order for us to be successful in acquiring, investigating, developing, and producing oil and gas from our current mineral leases and other leases that we may acquire in the future, we will need to generate an amount of capitalus. Liabilities in excess of that generated from our results of operations. In order to generate that additional capital, we may need to obtain an expanded debt facility and issue additional shares of our equity securities. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in either obtaining that expanded debt facility or issuing additional shares of our equity securities, and our inability to generate the needed additional capital may have a material adverse effect on our prospects and financial results of operations. If we are able to issue additional equity securities in order to generate such additional capital, then those issuances may occur at prices that represent discounts to our trading price, and will dilute the percentage ownership interest of those persons holding our shares prior to such issuances. Unless we are able to generate additional enterprise value with the proceeds of the sale of our equity securities, those issuances may adversely affect the value of our shares that are outstanding prior to those issuances.

A significant portion of our potential future reserves and our business plan depend upon secondary recovery techniques to establish production. There are significant risks associated with such techniques.

We anticipate that a significant portion of our future reserves and our business plan will be associated with secondary recovery projects that are either in the early stage of implementation or are scheduled for implementation subject to availability of capital. We anticipate that secondary recovery will affect our reserves and our business plan, and the exact project initiation dates and, by the very nature of water flood operations, the exact completion dates of such projects are uncertain. In addition, the reserves and our business plan associated with these secondary recovery projects, as with any reserves, are estimates only, as the success of any development project, including these water flood projects, cannot be ascertained in advance. If we are not successful in developing a significant portion of our reserves associated with secondary recovery methods, then the project may be uneconomic or generate less cash flow and reserves than we had estimated prior to investing the capital. Risks associated with secondary recovery techniques include, but are not limited to, the following:

higher than projected operating costs;
lower-than-expected production;
longer response times;
higher costs associated with obtaining capital;
unusual or unexpected geological formations;
fluctuations in oil and gas prices;
regulatory changes;
shortages of equipment; and
lack of technical expertise.

If any of these risks occur, it could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

Any acquisitions we complete are subject to considerable risk.

Even if we make acquisitions that we believe are good for our business, all acquisitions involve potential risks, including, among other things:

the validity of our assumptions about reserves, future production, revenues and costs, including synergies;
an inability to integrate successfully the businesses we acquire;
a decrease in our liquidity by using our available cash or borrowing capacity to finance acquisitions;
a significant increase in our interest expense or financial leverage if we incur additional debt to finance acquisitions;
the assumption of unknown liabilities, losses or costs for which we are not indemnified or for which our indemnity is inadequate;
the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns;
an inability to hire, train or retain qualified personnel to manage the acquired properties or assets;
the incurrence of other significant charges, such as impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets, asset devaluation or restructuring charges;
unforeseen difficulties encountered in operating in new geographic or geological areas; and
customer or key employee losses at the acquired businesses.

Our decision to acquire a property will depend in part on the evaluation of data obtained from production reports and engineering studies, geophysical and geological analyses and seismic and other information, the results of which are often incomplete or inconclusive.

Our reviews of acquired properties can be inherently incomplete because it is not always feasible to perform an in-depth review of the individual properties involved in each acquisition. Even a detailed review of records and properties may not necessarily reveal existing or potential problems, nor will it permit a buyer to become sufficiently familiar with the properties to assess fully their deficiencies and potential. Inspections may not always be performed on every well, and environmental problems, such as ground water contamination, plugging or orphaned well liability are not necessarily observable even when an inspection is undertaken.

 27

We must obtain governmental permits and approvals for drilling operations, which can result in delays in our operations, be a costly and time consuming process, and result in restrictions on our operations.

Regulatory authorities exercise considerable discretion in the timing and scope of permit issuances in the regions in which we operate. Compliance with the requirements imposed by these authorities can be costly and time consuming and may result in delays in the commencement or continuation of our exploration or production operations and/or fines. Regulatory or legal actions in the future may materially interfere with our operations or otherwise have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, we are often required to prepare and present to federal, state or local authorities data pertaining to the effect or impact that a proposed project may have on the environment, threatened and endangered species, and cultural and archaeological artifacts. Accordingly, the permits we need may not be issued, or if issued, may not be issued in a timely fashion, or may involve requirements that restrict our ability to conduct our operations or to do so profitably.

Due to our lack of geographic diversification, adverse developments in our operating areas would materially affect our business.

We currently only lease and operate oil and gas properties located in Kansas. As a result of this concentration, we may be disproportionately exposed to the impact of delays or interruptions of production from these properties caused by significant governmental regulation, transportation capacity constraints, curtailment of production, natural disasters, adverse weather conditions or other events which impact this area.

We depend on a small number of customers for all, or a substantial amount of our sales. If these customers reduce the volumes of oil and gas they purchase from us, our revenue and cash flow will decline to the extent we are not able to find new customers for our production.

In Kansas, we sell oil to Coffeyville Resources. There are approximately six potential purchasers of oil in Kansas. If a key purchaser were to reduce the volume of oil it purchases from us, our revenue and cash available for operations will decline to the extent we are not able to find new customers to purchase our production at equivalent prices.

We are not the operator and we have limited control over the activities on those properties.

We are not the operator of our Mississippian Project, and our dependence on the operator of this project limits our ability to influence or control the operation or future development of this project. Such limitations could materially adversely affect the realization of our targeted returns on capital related to exploration, drilling or production activities and lead to unexpected future costs.

We may suffer losses or incur liability for events for which we or the operator of a property have chosen not to obtain insurance.

Our operations are subject to hazards and risks inherent in producing and transporting oil and gas, such as fires, natural disasters, explosions, pipeline ruptures, spills, and acts of terrorism, all of which can result in the loss of hydrocarbons, environmental pollution, personal injury claims and other damage to our and others’ properties. As protection against operating hazards, we maintain insurance coverage, against some, but not all, potential losses. In addition, pollutionincluding coverage for professional liability and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. As a result of market conditions, existing insurance policies may not be renewed andcertain other desirable insurance may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. The occurrence of an event that is not covered, or not fully covered, by insuranceclaims, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our business dependsLopez v. AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-01810 (C.D. Cal.), consolidated with Madrid v. AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-01991 (C.D. Cal.)

As previously disclosed, AgEagle and certain of its current and former officers and directors were named as defendants in part on processing facilities owned by others. Any limitationtwo putative securities class actions filed in the availabilityU.S. District Court for the Central District of those facilities could interfere with our ability to market our oilCalifornia (Lopez v. AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc., et al., Case No. 2:21-cv01810; and gas productionMadrid v. AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc., et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-01991). These matters were consolidated, and could harm our business.a Lead Plaintiff designated by Court Order. On July 30, 2021, the Court-appointed Lead Plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal of the consolidated securities class action.

 

The marketability of our oilNostrand and gas production will depend in part on the availability, proximityRickerson v. Mooney et al. (Defendants) and capacity of pipelines and oil and gas processing facilities. The amount of oil and gas that can be produced and sold is subject to curtailment in certain circumstances, such as pipeline interruptions due to scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, excessive pressure, physical damage or lack of available capacity on such systems. The curtailments arising from these and similar circumstances may last from a few days to several months. In many cases, we will be provided only with limited, if any, notice as to when these circumstances will arise and their duration. Any significant curtailment in pipeline capacity or the capacity of processing facilities could significantly reduce our ability to market our oil and gas production and could materially harm our business.AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (Nominal Defendant), Case No. 3:21-cv-00130 (D. Nev.)

 

CostAs previously disclosed, on March 17, 2021, John Nostrand and availabilityDrew Rickerson filed a shareholder derivative complaint against the Company as the nominal defendant, Barrett Mooney, Grant Begley, Luisa Ingargolia, Thomas Gardner, Bret Chilcott, J. Michael Drozd, and Nicole Fernandez-McGovern. On July 20, 2021, the Plaintiffs in this derivative action filed a voluntary dismissal of drilling rigs, equipment, supplies, personnel and other services could adversely affect our ability to execute on a timely basis our development, exploitation and exploration plans.the action.

 

Shortages or an increase in costGranja v. AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. (Nominal Defendant), et al, Case No. 2:21-cv-06056 (C.D. Cal.)

On July 27,2021, a separate shareholder filed a similar derivative complaint against the Company as the nominal defendant and certain of drilling rigs, equipment, supplies or personnel could delay or interrupt our operations, which could impact our financial conditionits current and results of operations. Drilling activityformer officers and directors in the geographic areasU.S. District Court for the Central District of California (Granja v. AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc., et al, Case No. 2:21-cv-06056). On August 11, 2021, the Plaintiff in which we conduct drilling activities may increase, which would lead to increases in associated costs, including those related to drilling rigs, equipment, supplies and personnel andthis California derivative action filed a voluntary dismissal of the services and products of other vendors to the industry. Increased drilling activity in these areas may also decrease the availability of rigs. We do not have any contracts for drilling rigs and drilling rigs may not be readily available when we need them. Drilling and other costs may increase further and necessary equipment and services may not be available to us at economical prices.action.

 28

Our exposure to possible leasehold defects and potential title failure could materially adversely impact our ability to conduct drilling operations.

We obtain the right and access to properties for drilling by obtaining oil and gas leases either directly from the hydrocarbon owner, or through a third party that owns the lease. The leases may be taken or assigned to us without title insurance. There is a risk of title failure with respect to such leases, and such title failures could materially adversely impact our business by causing us to be unable to access properties to conduct drilling operations.

Our reserves are subject to the risk of depletion because many of our leases are in mature fields that have produced large quantities of oil and gas to date.

A significant portion of our current operations are located in or near established fields in Kansas. As a result, many of our leases are in, or directly offset, areas that have produced large quantities of oil and gas to date.  As such, our reserves may be negatively impacted by offsetting wells or previously drilled wells, which could significantly harm our business.

Our lease ownership may be diluted due to financing strategies we may employ in the future.

To accelerate our development efforts we may take on working interest partners who will contribute to the costs of drilling and completion operations and then share in any cash flow derived from production. In addition, we may in the future, due to a lack of capital or other strategic reasons, establish joint venture partnerships or farm out all or part of our development efforts. These economic strategies may have a dilutive effect on our lease ownership and could significantly reduce our operating revenues.

We are subject to complex laws and regulations, including environmental regulations, which can adversely affect the cost, manner or feasibility of doing business.

Development, production and sale of oil and gas in the United States are subject to extensive laws and regulations, including environmental laws and regulations. We may be required to make large expenditures to comply with environmental and other governmental regulations. Matters subject to regulation include, but are not limited to:

 

ITEM 4.location and density of wells;
the handling of drilling fluids and obtaining discharge permits for drilling operations;
accounting for and payment of royalties on production from state, federal and Indian lands;
bonds for ownership, development and production of oil and gas properties;
transportation of oil and gas by pipelines;
operation of wells and reports concerning operations; and
taxation.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

Under these laws and regulations, we could be liable for personal injuries, property damage, oil and gas spills, discharge of hazardous materials, remediation and clean-up costs and other environmental damages. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations also may result in the suspension or termination of our operations and subject us to administrative, civil and criminal penalties. Moreover, these laws and regulations could change in ways that substantially increase our costs. Accordingly, any of these liabilities, penalties, suspensions, terminations or regulatory changes could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations enough to possibly force us to cease our business operations.

Our operations may expose us to significant costs and liabilities with respect to environmental, operational safety and other matters.

We may incur significant costs and liabilities as a result of environmental and safety requirements applicable to our oil and gas production activities. We may also be exposed to the risk of costs associated with Kansas Corporation Commission requirements to plug orphaned and abandoned wells on our oil and gas leases from wells previously drilled by third parties. In addition, we may indemnify sellers or lessors of oil and gas properties for environmental liabilities they or their predecessors may have created. These costs and liabilities could arise under a wide range of federal, state and local environmental and safety laws and regulations, including regulations and enforcement policies, which have tended to become increasingly strict over time. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, imposition of cleanup and site restoration costs, liens and to a lesser extent, issuance of injunctions to limit or cease operations. In addition, claims for damages to persons or property may result from environmental and other impacts of our operations.Not applicable.

 

 29


Strict, joint and several liability may be imposed under certain environmental laws, which could cause us to become liable for the conduct of others or for consequences of our own actions that were in compliance with all applicable laws at the time those actions were taken. New laws, regulations or enforcement policies could be more stringent and impose unforeseen liabilities or significantly increase compliance costs. If we are not able to recover the resulting costs through insurance or increased revenues, our ability to operate effectively could be adversely affected.PART II

We operate in a highly competitive environment and our competitors may have greater resources than do we.

The oil and gas industry is intensely competitive and we compete with other companies, many of which are larger and have greater financial, technological, human and other resources. Many of these companies not only explore for and produce crude oil and gas but also carry on refining operations and market petroleum and other products on a regional, national or worldwide basis. Such companies may be able to pay more for productive oil and gas properties and exploratory prospects or define, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than our financial or human resources permit. In addition, such companies may have a greater ability to continue exploration activities during periods of low oil and gas market prices. Our ability to acquire additional properties and to discover reserves in the future will be dependent upon our ability to evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a highly competitive environment. If we are unable to compete, our operating results and financial position may be adversely affected.

Risks Associated with our Stock

We have ceased paying dividends on our Series A preferred stock, causing the trading price of the preferred stock to dramatically decline

On November 4, 2015, we announced that we would not be declaring the monthly dividend for the month of November 2015 on our 10.00% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock in order to preserve our cash resources. We have not declared the monthly dividend since. The failure to declare and pay monthly dividends on our preferred stock caused its trading price to decline substantially.

We do not expect to pay dividends to holders of our common stock because of the terms of our debt facility, and our need to reinvest cash flow from operations in our business.

It is unlikely that we will pay any dividends to the holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future. The terms of our debt facility require that the lender approve any such distributions, and the lender is unlikely to provide that consent so long as we have significant unpaid indebtedness outstanding.

 30

 

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

We have derivative securities currently outstanding and we may issue derivative securities in the future. Exercise of the derivatives will cause dilution to existing and new stockholders.

The exercise of our outstanding options and warrants, will cause additional shares of common stock to be issued, resulting in dilution to our existing and future common stockholders

We have the ability to issue additional shares of our common stock and preferred stock without asking for stockholder approval, which could cause your investment to be diluted.

 

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation authorize the board of directors to issue up to 250,000,000 shares of common stock and 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock.   The power of the board of directors to issue shares of common stock, preferred stock or warrants or options to purchase shares of common stock or preferred stockCommon Stock is generally not subject to shareholder approval.  Accordingly, any additional issuance of our common stock, or preferred stock that may be convertible into common stock, or debt instruments that may be convertible into common or preferred stock, may have the effect of diluting one’s investment.

Although our common stock is tradedcurrently quoted on the NYSE American and our Series A preferred stock is traded on the OTC PINK, daily trading volumes are small making it difficult for investors to sell their shares.

Our common stock and our Series A preferred stock trade under the symbol “ENRJ,“UAVS.

The following table sets forth, for the period indicated, the quarterly high and “ENRJP,” respectively but trading volume has been minimal. Therefore, the market for our common stock is limited. The trading pricelow closing sales prices per share of our stock could be subject to wide fluctuations. Investors may not be able to purchase additional shares or sell their shares within the time frame or atCommon Stock for each quarter during our last two fiscal years, as well as a price they desire.

The pricelarge portion of our common stock and Series A preferred stock may be volatile and you may not be able to resell your shares at a favorable price.

Regardlessfirst quarter in 2022, of whether an active trading market for our stock develops, the market price of our stock may be volatile and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price you paid for such shares. Many factors beyond our control, including but not limited to the following factors could affect our stock price:

our operating and financial performance and prospects;
quarterly variations in the rate of growth of our financial indicators, such as net income or loss per share, net income or loss and revenues;
changes in revenue or earnings estimates or publication of research reports by analysts about us or the exploration and production industry;
potentially limited liquidity;
actual or anticipated variations in our reserve estimates and quarterly operating results;
changes in oil and gas prices;
sales of our common stock by significant stockholders and future issuances of our common stock;
increases in our cost of capital;
changes in applicable laws or regulations, court rulings and enforcement and legal actions;
commencement of or involvement in litigation;
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
additions or departures of key management personnel;
general market conditions, including fluctuations in and the occurrence of events or trends affecting the price of oil and gas; and
domestic and international economic, legal and regulatory factors unrelated to our performance.

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation, restated bylaws and Nevada Law contain provisions that could discourage an acquisition or change of control of us.

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation authorize our board of directors to issue preferred stock and common stock without stockholder approval. The election by our board of directors to issue Series A preferred stock, and any future election to issue more preferred stock, could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us. In addition, provisions of the articles of incorporation and bylaws could also make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us. Furthermore, Nevada’s “Combination with Interested Stockholders’ Statute” and its “Control Share Acquisition Statute” may have the effect in the future of delaying or making it more difficult to effect a change in control of us.

These statutory anti-takeover measures may have certain negative consequences, including an effect on the ability of our stockholders or other individuals to (i) change the composition of the incumbent board of directors; (ii) benefit from certain transactions which are opposedas reported by the incumbent board of directors; and (iii) make a tender offer or attempt to gain control of us, even if such attempt were beneficial to us and our stockholders. Since such measures may also discourage the accumulations of large blocks of our common stock by purchasers whose objective is to seek control of us or have such common stock repurchased by us or other persons at a premium, these measures could also depress the market price of our common stock. Accordingly, our stockholders may be deprived of certain opportunities to realize the “control premium” associated with take-over attempts.New York Stock Exchange.

 

 31

2022 High Low
First Quarter (through March 31, 2022)  $1.76  $0.91 

 

2021 High Low
First Quarter $15.69  $5.47 
Second Quarter $8.35  $4.06 
Third Quarter $5.01  $2.94 
Fourth Quarter $3.05  $1.53 

2020 High Low
First Quarter $0.72  $0.30 
Second Quarter $2.30  $0.34 
Third Quarter $3.42  $1.15 
Fourth Quarter $7.93  $1.98 

As of March 31, 2022, we had approximately 367 individual shareholders of record of our Common Stock. We have no plans to pay dividends onbelieve that the number of beneficial owners of our common stock. You may not receive funds without selling your stock.Common Stock is greater than the number of record holders, because a number of shares of our Common Stock is held through brokerage firms in “street name.”

Dividend Policy

 

We do not anticipate paying anyintend to pay cash dividends onto our common stockstockholders in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain all our available funds and future earnings, if any, to finance the expansiongrowth and development of our business. OurAny future determination related to our dividend policy with regard to our common stock is within the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon various factors, including our business, financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, investment opportunities and restrictions contained in current or future financing instruments, including the consent of debt holders and holders of Series A Shares, if applicable at such time, and other factors our Board of Directors deems relevant.

Shareholders may be diluted significantly through our efforts to obtain financing and satisfy obligations through the issuance of securities.

Wherever possible, our board of directors will attempt to use non-cash consideration to satisfy obligations. In many instances, we believe that the non-cash consideration will consist of shares of our common stock, preferred stock or warrants to purchase shares of our common stock. Our board of directors has authority, without action or vote of the shareholders, subject to the requirements of the NYSE American (which generally require shareholder approval for any transactions which would result in the issuance of more than 20% of our then outstanding shares of common stock or voting rights representing over 20% of our then outstanding shares of stock), to issue all or part of the authorized but unissued shares of common stock, preferred stock or warrants to purchase such shares of common stock. In addition, we may attempt to raise capital by selling shares of our common stock, possibly at a discount to market in the future. These actions will result in dilution of the ownership interests of existing shareholders and may further dilute common stock book value, and that dilution may be material. Such issuances may also serve to enhance existing management’s ability to maintain control of us, because the shares may be issued to parties or entities committed to supporting existing management.

Additional Risks and Uncertainties

We are an oil and gas acquisition, exploration and development company. If any of the risks that we face actually occur, irrespective of whether those risks are described in this section or elsewhere in this report, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

Facilities

Executive offices are maintained at 4040 Broadway, Suite 425, San Antonio, Texas 78209 under a month-to-month agreement. 

Oil and Gas Properties

Information regarding the Company’s oil and gas properties can be found in “Item 1. Business”, above and under “Note 14 - Supplemental Oil and Gas Reserve Information (Unaudited)” to the Financial Statements included herein.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

On September 23, 2016, the Company, American Standard Energy Corporation, Baylor Operating LLC, Bernard Given and Loeb & Loeb LLP were sued by Geronimo Holdings Corporation and Randal Capps in the 143rd Judicial District Court located in Pecos, Texas. The suit among other things, seeks damages for an alleged unlawful sale of properties in Crockett County Texas and for alleged unpaid royalties. The Company believes the suit is without merit and will vigorously defend itself. The Company has faith that it will prevail and at December 31, 2016 no reserve for potential losses arising from this matter has been recorded. Additionally, under its agreement with Baylor Operating LLC, Baylor has agreed to indemnify and defend the Company against all lawsuits and claims including this one.

On April 26, 2016, C&F Ranch, LLC sued the Company in Allen County Kansas for alleged breach of contract related to the rental of certain lands located on the C&F Ranch. During the first quarter of 2018, the Company settled this dispute for $9,000.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

None.

 32

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Market Information for Common Stock

Our common stock trades on the NYSE American under the symbol “ENRJ.” The following table lists the quotations for the high and low sales prices of our common stock for each quarter during the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017. The market price of our common stock has been volatile. For an additional discussion, see “Item 1A: Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  

Year Ended December 31, 2016  High  Low 
Quarter ended March 31, 2016  $0.59  $0.17 
Quarter ended June 30, 2016  $0.49  $0.22 
Quarter ended September 30, 2016  $0.83  $0.26 
Quarter ended December 31, 2016  $0.46  $0.24 
Year Ended December 31, 2017         
Quarter ended March 31, 2017  $0.81  $0.26 
Quarter ended June 30, 2017  $1.15  $0.21 
Quarter ended September 30, 2017  $0.46  $0.26 
Quarter ended December 31, 2017  $0.85  $0.20 

Holders

As of March 15, 2018, there were 333 holders of record of our common stock, 8 holders of record of our Series A preferred stock, and one holder of both our Series B preferred stock and Series C preferred stock.  

Dividends

We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock. Through October 2015, we paid a monthly dividend of $.20833 per share or $2.50 in aggregate annual dividends per share on the Company’s non-convertible 10.0% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock. On November 4, 2015, the Company suspended the monthly dividend for the month of November 2015 on its 10.00% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) in order to preserve its cash resources. Payment of future dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock will be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors.

Under the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock, any unpaid dividends, will accumulate. If the Company does not pay dividends on its Series A Preferred Stock for six monthly periods (whether consecutive or non-consecutive), the dividend rate will increase to a maximum rate of 15.0% per annum and the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock will have the right, at the next meeting of stockholders, to elect two directors to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors along with other members of the Board, until all accumulated accrued and unpaid dividends are paid in full. During 2017, cash dividends were not paid and the dividends accumulated at 15.0% per annum.

We do not expect to pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Additionally, we are contractually prohibited by the terms of our outstanding debt from paying cash dividends on our common stock. Payment of future dividends on common stock, if any, will bemade at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend onupon, among other factors, our financial condition, results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, contained in current or future financing instruments, including the consent of debt holders and holders of Series A Preferred Stock, if applicable at such time,business prospects and other factors our Board of Directors deemsmay deem relevant.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation PlansPlan

 

The following table sets forthprovides information as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 regarding outstanding options granted under2021 about our stock option plansequity compensation plan and options reserved for future grant under the plans.arrangements:

 

        Number of shares 
  Number     remaining available for 
  of shares to be issued     future issuance under 
  upon exercise of  Weighted-average  equity compensation 
  outstanding options,  exercise price of  plans (excluding shares 
  warrants and rights  outstanding options,  reflected in column (a) 
Plan Category (a)  warrants and rights (b)  (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders  15,332  $7.63   700,158 
Plan category Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options
and restricted stock units
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
and restricted stock units
 Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  3,688,917  $1.98   4,639,733 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders         
Total  3,688,917  $1.98   4,639,733 

 

 33

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Except as discussed below, the Company has not issued, sold or granted any unregistered securities since September 30, 2017, other than those issuances, sales and grants which have previously been included in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or in a Current Report on Form 8-K.

On July 14, 2017, July 28, 2017 and August 30, 2017, the Company entered into Secured Promissory Notes totaling $225,000 with Alpha Capital Anstalt, which have a maturity date of June 30, 2018, and accrue interest at a rate of 8% per annum. The amount due under the notes is secured by a security interest, subordinate to certain other security interests of the Company, in substantially all of the Company's assets. The amount due under the notes is convertible into shares of the Company's common stock, at the option of Alpha Capital Anstalt, on identical terms as the outstanding Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (i.e., an initial conversion price of $0.30 per share, a 9.9% ownership limitation and certain anti-dilution rights, which currently result in a conversion price of $0.0612 per share). As of December 31, 2017, the principal balance of $225,000 remained due.

As previously reported, on April 27, 2017, the Company entered into an Additional Issuance Agreement with Alpha Capital Anstalt, for the purchase of 300 restricted shares of the Company's then newly designated Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in consideration for $300,000, with an option to purchase an additional 200 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had issued 300 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $300,000. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company had received $200,000 from Alpha Capital Anstalt to purchase an additional 200 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, which shares had not been issued as of December 31, 2017, and which are reflected as Series C Convertible Preferred Stock Issuable on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2017, in the aggregate amount of $200,000.

On February 13, 2018, the Company issued Alpha Capital Anstalt the 200,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock which it was due pursuant to the terms of the April 27, 2017, Additional Issuance Agreement, in consideration for the $200,000 paid during the year ended December 31, 2017.

We claim an exemption from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act, since the transactions did not involve a public offering, the recipient was an “accredited investor”, and acquired the securities for investment only and not with a view towards, or for resale in connection with, the public sale or distribution thereof. The securities are subject to transfer restrictions, and the certificates evidencing the securities contain an appropriate legend stating that such securities have not been registered under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold absent registration or pursuant to an exemption therefrom and are further subject to the terms of the escrow agreement. The securities were not registered under the Securities Act and such securities may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an exemption from registration under the Securities Act and any applicable state securities laws.

Subsequent to December 31, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt converted (a) 343.671 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock into 5,610,955 shares of common stock; and (b) 103.142 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into 1,683,944 shares of common stock, pursuant to the terms of such securities.

We claim an exemption from registration provided by Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act for such issuance, as the securities were exchanged by us with our existing security holder in a transaction where no commission or other remuneration was paid or given directly or indirectly for soliciting such exchange.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

None.

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Its Affiliates

 

Not applicable.None.

ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

This item is not required for Smaller Reporting Companies.

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion highlights the principal factors that have affected our financial condition and results of operations as well as our liquidity and capital resources for the periods described. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sectiondiscussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the other sectionsrelated notes included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements. Please see the explanatory note concerning “Forward-Looking Statements” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K including “Item 1 Business” and “Item 2. Properties” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”. This section includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27AItem 1A. Risk Factors for a discussion of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements such as “will”, “believe,” “are projected to be” and similar expressions are statements regarding future events or our future performance, and include statements regarding projected operating results. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, beliefs, intentions, strategies, forecastsuncertainties, risks and assumptions and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated byassociated with these forward-looking statements. These risksThe operating results for the periods presented were not materially affected by inflation.

Overview

AgEagle™ Aerial Systems Inc. (“AgEagle” or the “Company”), through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, is actively engaged in designing and delivering best-in-class drones, sensors and software that solve important problems for our customers. Founded in 2010, AgEagle was originally formed to pioneer proprietary, professional-grade, fixed-winged drones and aerial imagery-based data collection and analytics solutions for the agriculture industry. Today, the Company is earning distinction as a globally respected industry leader offering best-in-class, autonomous unmanned aerial systems (UAS) to a wide range of industry verticals, including energy/utilities, infrastructure, agriculture and government, among others.

The Company’s shift and expansion from solely manufacturing fixed-wing farm drones in 2018, to offering what the Company believes is one of the industry’s best fixed-wing, full-stack drone solutions, culminated in 2021 when AgEagle acquired three market-leading companies engaged in producing UAS airframes, sensors and software for commercial and government use. In addition to a robust portfolio of proprietary, connected hardware and software products, an established global network of nearly 200 UAS resellers, and enterprise customers worldwide, these acquisitions also brought AgEagle a highly valuable workforce comprised largely of experienced engineers and technologists with deep expertise in the fields of robotics, automation, manufacturing and data science.

AgEagle is led by a proven management team with years of drone industry experience. In view of AgEagle’s CEO’s appointment to the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Advanced Aviation Advisory Committee and Unmanned Aircraft Systems Beyond Visual Line of Sight Aviation Rulemaking Committee, in addition to, and the Company’s participation in the FAA’s BEYOND program, AgEagle has played a hands-on role in helping to establish necessary rulemaking guidelines and regulations for the future of autonomous flight and the full integration of drones into the U.S. airspace.

The Company is headquartered in Wichita, Kansas, where it also houses its U.S. manufacturing operations. In addition, AgEagle has business operations in Austin, Texas; Lausanne, Switzerland; Raleigh, North Carolina; Seattle, Washington; and Washington, D.C.

Key Growth Strategies

We intend to materially grow our business by leveraging our proprietary, best-in-class, full-stack drone solutions, industry influence and deep pool of talent with specialized expertise in robotics, automation, custom manufacturing and data science to achieve greater penetration of the global UAS industry – with near-term emphasis on capturing larger market share of the agriculture, energy/utilities, infrastructure and government/military verticals. We expect to accomplish this goal by first bringing three core values to life in our day-to-day operations and aligning them with our efforts to earn the trust and continued business of our customers and industry partners:


1.Curiosity – this pushes us to find value where others aren’t looking. It inspires us to see around corners for our customers, understanding the problems they currently face or will be facing in the future, and delivering them solutions best suited for their unique needs.

2.Passion – this fuels our obsession with excellence, our desire to try the difficult things and tackle big problems, and our commitment to meet our customers’ needs – and then surpass them.

3.Integrity – this is not optional or situational at AgEagle – it is the foundation for everything we do, even when no one is watching.

Key components of our growth strategy include butthe following:

Establish three centers of excellence with respective expertise in UAS software, sensors and airframes. These centers of excellence will cross pollinate ideas, industry insights and skillsets to yield intelligent autonomous solutions that fully leverage AgEagle’s experienced team’s specialized knowledge and know-how in robotics, automation, custom manufacturing and data science.

Deliver new and innovative solutions. AgEagle’s research and development efforts are critical building blocks of the Company, and we intend to continue investing in our own innovations, pioneering new and enhanced products and solutions that enable us to satisfy our customers – both in response to and in anticipation of their needs. AgEagle believes that by investing in research and development, the Company can be a leader in delivering innovative autonomous systems and solutions that address market needs beyond our current target markets, enabling us to create new opportunities for growth.

Growth through acquisition. Through successful execution of our growth-through-acquisition strategies, we intend to acquire technologically advanced UAS companies and intellectual property that complement and strengthen our value proposition to the market. We believe that by investing in complementary acquisitions, we can accelerate our revenue growth and deliver a broader array of innovative autonomous flight systems and solutions that address specialized market needs within our current target markets and in emerging markets that can benefit from innovations in artificial intelligence-enabled robotics and data capture and analytics.

Competitive Strengths

AgEagle believes the following attributes and capabilities provide us with long-term competitive advantages:

Proprietary technologies, in-house capabilities and industry experience –We believe our decade of experience in commercial UAS design and engineering; in-house manufacturing, assembly and testing capabilities; and advanced technology development skillset serve to differentiate AgEagle in the marketplace. In fact, approximately 70% of our Company’s global workforce is comprised of engineers and data scientists with deep experience and expertise in robotics, automation, custom manufacturing and data analytics. In addition, AgEagle is committed to meeting and exceeding quality and safety standards for manufacturing, assembly, design and engineering and testing of drones, drone subcomponents and related drone equipment in our Wichita-based and Swiss manufacturing operations.

AgEagle is more than just customer- and product-centric, we are obsessed with innovation and knowing the needs of our customers before they do – We are focused on capitalizing on our specialized expertise in innovating and commercializing advanced drone, sensor and software technologies to provide our existing and future customers with autonomous robotic solutions that meet the highest possible safety and operational standards and fit their specific business needs. We have established three Centers of Excellence that our leadership has challenged to cross-pollinate ideas, industry insights and interdisciplinary skillsets to generate intelligent autonomous solutions that efficiently leverage our expertise in robotics, automation and manufacturing to solve problems for our customers, irrespective of the industry sector in which they may operate.

We offer market-tested drones, sensors and software solutions that have earned the longstanding trust and fidelity of customers worldwide – through successful execution of our acquisition strategy in 2021, AgEagle is now delivering a unified line of industry trusted drones, sensors and software that have been vigorously tested and consistently proven across multiple industry verticals and use cases. For instance, our line of eBee fixed wing drones, pioneered by senseFly, have flown more than one million flights over the past decade serving customers spanning surveying and mapping; engineering and construction; military/defense; mining, quarries and aggregates; agriculture humanitarian aid and environmental monitoring, among just a few. Featured in over 100 research publications globally, advanced sensor innovations developed and commercialized by MicaSense, have served to forge new industry standards for high performance, high resolution, thermal and multispectral imaging for commercial drone applications in agriculture, plant research, land management and forestry. In addition, we have championed the development of end-to-end software solutions which power autonomous flight and deliver actionable, contextual data and analytics for a who’s who of Fortune 500 companies, government agencies and a wide range of businesses in agriculture, energy and utilities, construction and other industry sectors.


Impact of COVID-19 On Our Business Operations

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) has evolved into a global pandemic. The coronavirus has spread to many regions of the world, including the United States. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our business and operating results will depend on future developments that are not limited to:highly uncertain and cannot be accurately predicted, including new information that may emerge concerning COVID-19 and the actions to contain the coronavirus or treat its impact, among others.

The spread of the coronavirus, which has caused a broad impact globally, including restrictions on travel and quarantine policies put into place by businesses and governments, may have a material economic effect on our business. While the potential economic impact brought on by and the duration of the pandemic may be difficult to assess or predict, it has already caused, and is likely to result in further, significant disruptions of global financial markets, which may reduce our ability to deployaccess capital ineither at all or on favorable terms. In addition, a manner that maximizes stockholder value;recession, depression or other sustained adverse market event resulting from the spread of the coronavirus could materially and adversely affect our business and the value of our Common Stock.

In addition, as a result of the pandemic, our ability to identify suitable acquisition candidatesaccess components and parts needed in order to manufacture our proprietary drones and sensors, and to perform quality testing have been impacted. If either we or businessany third-parties in the supply chain for materials used in our manufacturing and investments opportunities;assembly processes continue to be adversely impacted by restrictions resulting from the coronavirus pandemic, our supply chain may be further disrupted, limiting our ability to reduce our operating costs; general economic conditionsmanufacture and our expected liquidity in future periods. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this filing and particularly in the “Risk Factors” set forth in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As a result, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.

Overview

Since the execution of the merger agreement on October 19, 2017, our primary business strategy has focused on achieving the requirements necessary to consummate the merger. We continue to move forward with this strategy with an anticipated closing prior to March 31, 2018. In the event the merger is not consummated, our intent is to refocus on the development of oil and gas properties. Our business activities are currently focused in Kansas.

Results of Operationsassemble products.

 

The following table presents selected information regardingultimate impact of the current pandemic, or any other health epidemic, is highly uncertain and subject to change. We do not yet know the full extent of potential delays or impacts on our operating results from continuingbusiness or the global economy as a whole. However, these effects can have a material impact on our operations.

 

  Year Ended  Year Ended    
  December 31,  December 31,    
  2017  2016  Difference 
Oil & gas revenues(1)            
Crude oil revenues $1,309,496  $2,390,024  $(1,080,528)
Average price per Bbl  41.04   40.75   0.29 
Natural gas revenues  19,509   71,703   (52,194)
Average price per Mcf  1.67   1.51   0.16 
Expenses:            
Lease operating expenses(2)  1,363,946   2,661,258   (1,297,312)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization(3)  239,776   254,329   (14,553)
Impairment of oil and gas properties     8,032,670   (8,032,670)
Total production expenses  1,603,722   10,948,257   (9,344,535)
Professional fees(4)  1,390,512   310,471   1,080,041 
Salaries(5)  350,863   1,723,789   (1,372,926)
Depreciation - other fixed assets  106,421   159,638   (53,217)
Administrative expenses(6)  545,267   458,375   86,892 
Total expenses $3,996,785  $13,600,530  $(9,603,745)

 34

(1)2017 crude oil revenues decreased $1.1 million or 45% to 1.3 million from $2.4 million in fiscal 2016.  This decrease was due to the decline in production. Realized oil prices increased $0.29 or 1% during 2017 from an average of $40.75 per bbl in 2016 to an average of $41.04 per bbl in 2017. Increasing prices offset the drop in crude oil revenues by approximately $17,000. A decrease in production volumes in 2017 accounted for substantially all of the $1.1 million decrease in revenues. Volumes decreased by approximately 26,700 bbls or 46% to 31,909 bbls in 2017 compared to production of 58,653 bbls in 2016.  2017 natural gas revenues decreased approximately $52,000 or 73% to $19,500 from $71,700 in 2016. The decrease was due to lower production in 2016. Natural gas prices increased $0.17 per mcf or 11% from an average price of $1.51 in 2016 to an average price of $1.67 in 2017. This increase in prices offset the decrease in revenue by $8,000. A decrease in production volumes accounted for $60,000 of the $52,000 decrease in revenues. Natural gas volumes decreased approximately 35,900 mcf or 76% in 2017 from 47,600 mcf in 2016 to 11,600 mcf in 2017.

(2)2017 lease operating expenses decreased $1.3 million or 49% to $1.4 million from $2.7 million in 2016. However, lease operating expenses per boe increased 1% or $0.32 to $40.29 in 2017 from $39.97 per boe in 2016.  

(3)Depletion expense per boe increased 85% or $3.26 per boe from $3.82 per boe in 2016 to $7.08 per boe in 2017. During 2017, depletion expense decreased approximately $14,000 to approximately $240,000 from $254,000 in 2016.

(4)Professional fees increased 348% or approximately $1.1 million from approximately $310,500 in 2016 to approximately $1,390,512 in 2017. The use of consultants, to replace the reduction in employees, accounted for $765,000 of this increase. In addition, legal fees increased by $309,000.

(5)Salaries decreased 80% or approximately $1.4 million. The decrease was due primarily to decreased head counts following the LSA transaction.

(6)Administrative expenses increased approximately $87,000 or 19%. The increase was due primarily to increased spending on SEC matters of $104,000.  

Reserves

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
Proved Reserves 2017  2016 
Total proved PV10 (present value) of reserves $1,468,540  $3,437,030 
Total proved reserves (BOE) $455,790  $1,587,690 
Average Price (per bbl) $51.34  $37.36 
Average Price (per mcf) $2.97  $1.65 

Of the 0.5 million BOE of total proved reserves, approximately 14.7% are classified as proved developed producing and approximately 85.3% are classified as proved undeveloped.

The following table presents summary information regarding our estimated net proved reserves as of December 31, 2017. All calculations of estimated net proved reserves have been made in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC, and, except as otherwise indicated, give no effect to federal or state income taxes. The estimates of net proved reserves are based on the reserve reports prepared by Cobb & Associates Inc., our independent petroleum consultants. For additional information regarding our reserves, please see Note 14 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

Summary of Proved Oil and Gas Reserves

December 31, 2017

  Gross  Net 
     Natural
Gas
     Oil     Natural
Gas
     Oil    
Proved Reserves Crude Oil  Liquids  Natural Gas  Equivalents  Crude Oil  Liquids  Natural Gas  Equivalents  PV 10(1) 
Category BBL’s  BBL’s  MCF’s  BOE’s  BBL’s  BBL’s  MCF’s  BOE’s  (before tax) 
Proved, Developed  94,100         94,100   66,810         66,810   511,740 
Proved, Undeveloped  525,100         525,100   388,980         388,980   956,800 
Total Proved  619,200         619,200   455,800         455,800   1,468,540 

In 2017 the Company invested approximately $4,600 in its oil and gas properties. These reduced expenditures were in response to extremely low commodity prices. At year end the Company’s review of proved undeveloped reserves revealed challenges but the Company maintains its belief that reserves will be developed within five years of their initial recording as a proved undeveloped reserve. In addition, it believes it has the financial wherewithal to develop all of its proved undeveloped reserves within the five year time frames required; utilizing its balance sheet, to borrow funds as needed and it has the ability to joint venture any of its assets.

 35

(1)The following table shows our reconciliation of our PV10 to our standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows (the most direct comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP). PV10 is our estimate of the present value of future net revenues from estimated proved oil and gas reserves after deducting estimated production and ad valorem taxes, future capital costs and operating expenses, but before deducting any estimates of future income taxes. The estimated future net revenues are discounted at an annual rate of 10% to determine their “present value.” We believe PV10 to be an important measure for evaluating the relative significance of our oil and gas properties and that the presentation of the non-GAAP financial measure of PV10 provides useful information to investors because it is widely used by professional analysts and sophisticated investors in evaluating oil and gas companies. Because there are many unique factors that can impact an individual company when estimating the amount of future income taxes to be paid, we believe the use of a pre-tax measure is valuable for evaluating our company. We believe that most other companies in the oil and gas industry calculate PV10 on the same basis. PV10 should not be considered as an alternative to the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows as computed under GAAP.
  As of December 31,  As of December 31, 
  2017  2016 
PV10 (before tax) $1,468,540  $3,437,030 
Future income taxes, net of 10% discount $  $ 
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $1,468,540  $3,437,030 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is a measure of a company’s ability to meet potential cash requirements. We have historically met our capital requirements through debt financing, revenues from operations, asset sales and the issuance of equity securities. Accordingly, the Company has chosen to preserve liquidity by not devoting capital to its oil and gas properties, while minimizing expenditures for operating, general and administrative expenses.

In conjunction with the anticipated merger, the Company will satisfy its long-term indebtedness with the sale of its assets to the existing lender and anticipates having sufficient liquidity post-merger to satisfy its other liabilities.

The following table summarizes total current assets, total current liabilities and working capital at the year ended December 31, 2017 compared2021, our supply chain was adversely impacted by the pandemic, causing material delays in the delivery of critical supply orders associated with timely fulfilling our obligations to our large ecommerce client. As a consequence, significant inventory purchases were made in 2021 in order to secure the year ended December 31, 2016.

  Year Ended  Year Ended    
  December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016  Difference 
Current Assets $1,045,383  $1,678,967  $(633,584)
Current Liabilities $6,129,671  $19,754,406  $(13,624,789)
Working Capital (deficit) $(5,084,288) $(18,075,439) $12,991,151 

Senior Secured Credit Facilitymanufacturing of our products in an effort to prevent delays in 2022. This is an on-going situation that we continue to monitor closely.

 

On October 3, 2011, the Company, DD Energy, Inc., EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLCCritical Accounting Policies and Working Interest, LLC (“Borrowers”) entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Texas Capital Bank, N.A. (“Bank”) and other financial institutions and banks that may become a party to the Credit Agreement from time to time. The facilities provided under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement were to be used to refinance Borrowers prior outstanding revolving loan facility with Bank, dated July 3, 2008, and for working capital and general corporate purposes.Estimates

 

AtOur management’s discussion and analysis of our option, loans under the facility will bear stated interest based on the Base Rate plus Base Rate Margin, or Floating Rate plus Floating Rate Margin (as those terms are defined in the Credit Agreement). The Base Rate will be, for any day, a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the higherfinancial condition and results of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% and (b) the Bank’s prime rate. The Floating Rate shall mean, at Borrower’s option, a per annum interest rate equal to (i) the Eurodollar Rate plus Eurodollar Margin, or (ii) the Base Rate plus Base Rate Margin (as those terms are defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement). Eurodollar borrowings may be for one, two, three, or six months, as selected by the Borrowers. The margins for all loansoperations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our most critical estimates include those related to revenue recognition, inventories and reserves for excess and obsolescence, accounting for stock-based awards, and income taxes. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe the following critical accounting estimates affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in preparing our consolidated financial statements. Please see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, which are included in Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report, for our Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. There have been no material changes made to the critical accounting estimates during the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements.


Revenue Recognition

 The majority of our revenue is generated pursuant to written contractual arrangements to develop, manufacture and/or modify complex drone related products, and to provide associated engineering, technical and other services according to customer specifications. These contracts are fixed price, and we account for all revenue contracts in accordance with ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). Under fixed-price contracts, we agree to perform the specified work for a pricing grid rangingpre-determined price. To the extent our actual costs vary from 0.00%the estimates upon which the price was negotiated, we will generate more or less profit or could incur a loss. We account for a contract after it has been approved by all parties to 0.75%the arrangement, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is probable.

Topic 606 requires revenue to be recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services and recognize revenue under the Base Rate Margin and 2.25% to 3.00%new standard as costs are incurred. Under previous US GAAP revenue was generally recognized when deliveries were made, performance milestones were attained, or as costs were incurred. The new standard accelerates the timing of when the revenue is recognized, however, it does not change the total amount of revenue recognized on our UAVS contracts. The new standard does not affect revenue recognition for the Floating Rate Margin based onpurposes of our UAVS, sensor or software subscription sales as each of the Company’s Borrowing Base Utilization Percentage (as definedrevenue transactions represent a single performance obligation that is satisfied at a point in time or monthly subscription fees which are recognized ratably over the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement).

On December 15, 2011, we entered into a First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note in the amount of $50,000,000 with the Bank. The Amendment reflects the addition of Rantoul Partners, as an additional Borrower and adds as additional security for the loans the assets held by Rantoul Partners.

 36

On August 31, 2012, we entered into a Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with the Bank. The Second Amendment: (i) increased the borrowing base to $7,000,000, (ii) reduced the minimum interest rate to 3.75% and (iii) added additional new leases as collateral for the loan.

On November 2, 2012, we entered into a Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with the Bank. The Third Amendment (i) increased the borrowing base to $12,150,000 and (ii) clarified certain continuing covenants and provided a limited waiver of compliance with one of the covenants so clarified for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2011.

On January 24, 2013, we entered into a Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which was made effective as of December 31, 2012 with the Bank. The Fourth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) the Bank consented to the restructuring transactions related to the dissolution of Rantoul Partners, and (ii) the Bank terminated a Limited Guaranty,subscription period, as defined in the Credit Agreement, executed by Rantoul Partnersnew ASU. Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue for small UAS product contracts with customers at the point in favortime when the transfer of control passes to the Bank.customer, which is generally upon shipping.

 

On April 16, 2013, the Bank increased our borrowing base to $19,500,000.Inventories and Provision for Obsolescence

 

On September 30, 2013, we entered intoOur policy for valuation of inventory, including the determination of obsolete inventory, requires us to perform a Fifth Amendmentdetailed assessment of inventory at each balance sheet date, which includes a review of, among other factors, an estimate of future demand for products within specific time horizons, valuation of existing inventory, as well as product lifecycle and product development plans. Inventory reserves are also provided to cover risks arising from slow-moving items. We write down our inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the Amendeddifference between the cost of inventory and Restated Credit Agreement. The Fifth Amendment reflects the following changes: it (i) expanded the principal commitment amount of the Bankestimated net realizable value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. We may be required to $100,000,000; (ii) increased the Borrowing Base to $38,000,000; (iii) added Black Raven Energy, Inc. to the Credit Agreement as a borrower party; (iv) added certain collateral and security interests in favor of the Bank; and (v) reduced the interest rate to 3.30%.record additional inventory write-downs if actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by our management.

 

On November 19, 2013, we entered into a Sixth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Sixth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) the addition of Iberia Bank as a participant in our credit facility, and (ii) a technical correction to our covenant calculations.Business Combinations

On May 22, 2014, we entered into a Seventh Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Seventh Amendment reflects the Bank’s consent to our issuance of up to 850,000 shares of our 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock.

On August 15, 2014, we entered into an Eighth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Eighth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) the borrowing base was increased from $38 million to $40 million, and (ii) the maturity of the facility was extended by three years to October 3, 2018.

On April 29, 2015, we entered into a Ninth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. In the Ninth Amendment, the Bank (i) re-determined the Borrowing Base based upon the Reserve Report dated January 1, 2015, (ii) imposed affirmative obligations on the Company to use a portion of proceeds received with regard to future sales of securities or certain assets to repay the loan, (iii) consented to non-compliance by the Company with certain terms of the Credit Agreement, (iv) waived certain provisions of the Credit Agreement, and (v) agreed to certain other amendments to the Credit Agreement.

On May 1, 2015, the Borrowers and the Banks entered into a Letter Agreement to clarify that up to $1,000,000 in proceeds from any potential future securities offering will be unencumbered by the Banks’ liens as described in the Credit Agreement through November 1, 2015, and that, until November 1, 2015, such proceeds would not be subject to certain provisions in the Credit Agreement prohibiting the Company from declaring and paying dividends that may be due and payable to holders of securities issued in such potential offerings or issued prior to the Letter Agreement.

On August 12, 2015, we entered into a Tenth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Tenth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) allow the Company to sell certain oil assets in Kansas, (ii) allow for approximately $1,300,000 of the proceeds from the sale to be reinvested in Company owned oil and gas projects and (iii) apply not less than $1,500,000 from the proceeds of the sale to outstanding loan balances.

On November 13, 2015, the Company entered into a Eleventh Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Eleventh Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) waived certain provisions of the Credit Agreement, (ii) suspended certain hedging requirements, and (iii) made certain other amendments to the Credit Agreement.  

On April 1, 2016, the Company informed the Bank that it would cease making the mandatory monthly borrowing base reduction payments and did not make the required April 1, 2016 payment. The Company made its mandatory quarterly interest payments on April 6, 2016 and May 2, 2016. On April 7, 2016, the Company entered into a Forbearance Agreement whereby the Bank agreed to not exercise remedies and rights afforded it under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement for thirty days. The thirty day period was to be used by the Company to pursue strategic alternatives.

 37

On April 28, 2016, the Bank informed the Company that it would extend the above Forbearance Agreement period to May 31, 2016 upon effecting a principal reduction of $125,000. In addition, the Company will receive an automatic extension to September 15, 2016 upon meeting certain terms and conditions specified by the Bank. On May 31, 2016, the Company and the Bank amended the Forbearance Agreement to extend the forbearance period to August 31, 2016. On July 29, 2016, the Company and the Bank amended the Forbearance Agreement to extend the forbearance period to October 1, 2016. 

On October 1, 2016, the Company and the Bank could not reach an agreement to extend the Third Amendment to the Forbearance Agreement. Following this outcome, the Company decided to discontinue payment of interest on its outstanding loan obligations with the Bank. The Company continued to evaluate plans to restructure, amend or refinance existing debt through private options.  

On February 10, 2017, the Company, TCB and IberiaBank (collectively, “Sellers”), and PWCM Investment Company IC LLC, and certain financial institutions (collectively, “Buyers”) entered into a Loan Sale Agreement (“LSA”), pursuant to which Sellers sold to Buyers, and Buyers purchased from Sellers, all of Sellers’ right, title and interest in, to and under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents, in exchange for (i) a cash payment of $5,000,000 (the “Cash Purchase Price”), (ii) a Synthetic Equity Interest equal to 10% of the proceeds, after Buyer’s realization of a 150% return on the Cash Purchase Price within five (5) years of the closing date of the sale, with payment being distributed 65.78947368% to TCB and 34.21052632% to IberiaBank, and (iii) at any time prior to February 10, 2022, Buyer may acquire the interest in clause (ii) above. In connection with the LSA, the Company released Sellers and its successors as holders of the rights under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents, including Buyers, from any and all claims under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents. 

Also on February 10, 2017, the Company and its subsidiaries, and successor lender entered into a binding letter agreement dated February 10, 2017, which was subsequently amended on March 30, 2017 (as amended, the “letter agreement”) pursuant to which:

1.the successor lender agreed to forgive our existing secured loan in the approximate principal amount of $17,295,000, and in exchange entered into a secured promissory note (which we refer to as the “restated secured note”) in the original principal amount of $4,500,000.
2.we:
a.conveyed our oil and gas properties and associated performance and surety bonds in Colorado, Texas, and Nebraska;
b.conveyed all of our shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc. (together (a) and (b), the “conveyed oil and gas assets”); and
c.retained our assets in Kansas and continued as a going concern. The Kansas assets currently provide most of our current operating revenue.

The restated secured note:

a.is secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s oil and gas producing assets situated in the State of Kansas,
b.evidences accrued interest on the $4,500,000 principal balance at a rate of 16% per annum,
c.bears interest from and after May 1, 2017, at a rate of 16.0% per annum,
d.is pre-payable in full at a discount at any time during the term of the restated secured note upon the Company paying $3,300,000 to successor lender, and
e.matures and is due and payable in full on November 1, 2017 (which date has been extended as discussed below).

 

The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018. We have an option to extend the maturity date of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.

So long as we repay the $3,300,000 in indebtedness on or prior to the maturity date, as extended, all other amounts payable under the restated secured note are to be forgiven.

The closing occurred on May 10, 2017. As part of the closing procedures and net settlement, we issued a promissory note to Pass Creek Resources LLC in the amount of $105,806. The promissory bears interest at 16% per annum and matured on June 9, 2017. The amount due was not paid on June 9, 2017, but the holder has not provided the Company a notice of default.

 38

In connection with the May 10, 2017 closing and in consideration of the satisfaction of $13,425,000 of the amount due under the Credit Agreement, as amended, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries transferred to PCR Holdings LLC, an affiliate of the successor lenders under the Credit Agreement, all of the Company’s oil and gas properties and assets located in Colorado, Texas, and Nebraska, as well as the Company’s shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc.

To evidence the Company’s remaining $4,500,000 of indebtedness to PWCM Investment Company IC LLC (“PWCM”), RES Investment Group, LLC (“RES”), Round Rock Development Partners, LP (“Round Rock”), and Cibolo Holdings, LLC (“Cibolo Holdings,” and together with PWCM, RES and Round Rock, “Successor Lenders”), the Company’s subsidiaries (except Kansas Holdings, LLC) entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Cortland Capital Market Services LLC, as Administrative Agent, and the other financial institutions and banks parties thereto (the “New Credit Agreement”), and a related Amended and Restated Note (the “New Note”), in the amount of $3.3 million as described above. 

Our subsidiaries’ obligations under the credit agreement and note are non-recourse and are secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ oil properties and assets located in Kansas. The Company was removed as a borrower under the Credit Agreement, but entered into a Guaranty of Recourse Carveouts,records acquisitions pursuant to which the Company guarantees its subsidiaries’ payment of certain fees and expenses due under the Credit Agreement, and may be liable for certain conduct, such as fraud, bad faith, gross negligence, and waste of the Kansas oil properties or assets.

On December 22, 2017, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amendment) with Pass Creek Resources, LLCASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, (“Pass Creek”) and Cortland Capital Market Services, LLC (“Administration Agent”ASC 805”). The Company Pass Creek, and Administrative Agent are parties to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated May 10, 2017. The Maturity Daterecognizes, with certain exceptions, 100% of the Loan has been extendedfair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests when the acquisition constitutes a change in control of the acquired entity. Shares issued in consideration for a business combination, contingent consideration arrangements and pre-acquisition loss and gain contingencies are all measured and recorded at their acquisition-date fair value. Subsequent changes to fair value of contingent consideration arrangements are generally reflected in earnings. Any in-process research and development assets acquired are capitalized as of the earlieracquisition date. Acquisition-related transaction costs are expensed as incurred. The operating results of (i) February 15, 2018 or April 30, 2018, if (a)entities acquired are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss from the respective dates of acquisition.


Goodwill and Intangible Assets

 Intangible assets from acquired businesses are recognized at fair value on the acquisition date and consist of customer programs, trademarks, customer relationships, technology, and other intangible assets. Customer programs include values assigned to major programs of acquired businesses and represent the aggregate value associated with the customer relationships, contracts, technology, and trademarks underlying the associated program and are amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of expected cash flows used to measure fair value, which ranges from three to five years.

In accordance with ASC Topic 350-40, Software - Internal-Use Software (“ASC 350-40”), the Company provide noticecapitalizes certain direct costs of developing internal-use software that are incurred in the application development stage, when developing or obtaining software for internal use. Once the internal use software is ready for its intended use, it is amortized on a straight-line basis over its useful life.

Finite-lived intangible assets are evaluated for impairment periodically, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their related carrying amounts may not be recoverable in accordance with ASC Topic 360-10-15, Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, (“ASC 360-10-15”). In evaluating intangible assets for recoverability, the Company uses its best estimate of future cash flows expected to result from the Administrative Agentuse of their intent to extend the maturity dateasset and (b) no latereventual disposition in accordance with ASC 360-10-15. To the extent that estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are less than the first Business Day following delivery of such notice pay a $100,000 extension fee, or (ii) the merger of AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of October 19, 2017. At the closing of First Amendment, Company paid Pass Creek a $65,000 extension fee and $7,500 to the Administrative Agent for additional fees. The Company also paid the Administrative Agentcarrying amount, an additional $45,000 upon the filing of a definitive proxy statement by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company also agreed to borrow Improvement Advancesimpairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the difference between the carrying value of such asset and its fair value.

Asset recoverability is an area involving management judgment, requiring assessment as to whether the carrying values of assets are supported by their undiscounted future cash flows. In estimating future cash flows, certain assumptions are required to be made in respect of highly uncertain matters such as revenue growth rates, operating expenses and terminal growth rates.

Goodwill represents costs in excess of fair values assigned to the underlying identifiable net assets of acquired businesses. Goodwill is not subject to exceed $300,000. The Company has extendedamortization and is tested annually for impairment, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the restated secured note to March 23, 2018 and has the option to extend the maturity datecarrying value of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.goodwill may not be recoverable.

 

As of December 31, 2017,2021 and 2020, our goodwill balance was $64.9 million and $3.1 million, respectively. We perform an annual impairment test of our goodwill at least annually in the principalfourth quarter or more frequently whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may be impaired. Such events or changes in circumstances may include a significant deterioration in overall economic conditions, changes in the business climate of our industry, a decline in our market capitalization, operating performance indicators, competition, reorganizations of our business. Our goodwill has been allocated to and is tested for impairment at a level referred to as the business segment. The level at which we test goodwill for impairment requires us to determine whether the operations below the business segment constitute a self-sustaining business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results.

We use both qualitative and quantitative approaches when testing goodwill for impairment. To perform a qualitative assessment, we review events and circumstances that could affect the significant inputs used to determine if the fair value is less than the carrying value of goodwill. If the qualitative assessment indicates that a goodwill impairment may exist, or we decide not to perform a qualitative assessment, we proceed to perform a quantitative assessment. To perform the quantitative impairment test, we compare the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired. If the carrying value of the reporting unit, including goodwill, exceeds its fair value, a goodwill impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. We generally estimate the fair value of each reporting unit using a combination of a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) analysis and market-based valuation methodologies such as comparable public company trading values and values observed in recent business acquisitions. Determining fair value requires the exercise of significant judgments, including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, long-term growth rates, discount rates and relevant comparable public company earnings multiples and relevant transaction multiples. The cash flows employed in the DCF analysis are based on our best estimate of future sales, earnings and cash flows after considering factors such as general market conditions, existing firm orders, expected future orders, changes in working capital, long term business plans and recent operating performance.


Finite-lived intangibles are amortized to expense over the applicable useful lives, ranging from four to five years, based on the nature of the asset and the underlying pattern of economic benefit as reflected by future net cash inflows. We perform an impairment test of finite-lived intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate their carrying value may be impaired. If events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of a finite-lived intangible may be impaired, the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset group would be compared to the asset group’s carrying value. If the asset group’s carrying amount exceed the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows, we would determine the fair value of the asset group and record an impairment loss in net earnings.

During the fourth quarter 2021, we performed our annual goodwill and finite-lived intangible assets impairment tests for our three reporting units. The results of these tests indicated that the Company’s Drones and Custom Manufacturing and Sensors reporting units exceeded their respective carrying amounts, while the fair value of the SaaS reporting unit was less than its carrying amount reflected in the consolidated balance of $4,457,347 along with accrued interest of $479,452 remained due under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. At December 31, 2017,sheets. Accordingly, the Company was not in compliance with certain covenants, andrecorded a $12,357,921 goodwill impairment charge on its SaaS reporting unit during the loan may be called due by Pass Creek.fourth quarter of 2021. The results of these tests indicated that for our reporting units no impairment charges were necessary related to our finite-intangibles assets of $13,565,494.

 

As of December 31, 2017, the principal balance of $80,805 along with accrued interest of $9,616 remained due under the promissory note with Pass Creek Resources LLC.  

On July 14, 2017, July 28, 20172020, we performed our annual goodwill and August 30, 2017, the Company entered into Secured Promissory Notes totaling $225,000 with Alpha Capital Anstalt, which have a maturity date of June 30, 2018,finite-lived intangible assets impairment tests for our Drones and accrue interest at a rate of 8% per annum.Custom Manufacturing and SaaS reporting units. The amount due under the notes is secured by a security interest, subordinate to certain other security interests of the Company, in substantially all of the Company's assets. The amount due under the notes is convertible into shares of the Company's common stock, at the option of Alpha Capital Anstalt, on identical terms as the outstanding Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (i.e., an initial conversion price of $0.30 per share, a 9.9% ownership limitation and certain anti-dilution rights, which currently result in a conversion price of $0.0612 per share). As of December 31, 2017, the principal balance of $225,000 remained due.

Satisfaction of our cash obligations for the next 12 months

In conjunction with the anticipated merger, the Company will satisfy its long-term indebtedness with the sale of its assets to the existing lender and anticipates having sufficient liquidity post-merger to satisfy its other liabilities.

Summary of product research and development that we will perform for the term of our plan

We do not anticipate performing any significant product research and development under our plan of operation.

Expected purchase or sale of any significant equipment

In the event the merger is not consummated, we anticipate that we will purchase the necessary production and field service equipment required to produce oil and gas during our normal course of operations over the next 12 months.

Significant changes in the number of employees

We currently have one full-time employee. We use and will continue to use independent consultants and contractors to perform various professional services, particularly in the area of land services, reservoir engineering, and general and administrative functions. We believe that this use of third-party service providers may enhance our ability to contain operating and general expenses, and capital costs.  

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resourcesthese tests indicated that is material to investors.

 39

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our accounting policies and estimates that are critical to our business operations and understanding of our results of operations include those relating to our oil and gas properties, asset retirement obligations and the value of share-based payments. This is not a comprehensive list of all of the accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by U.S. GAAP, with no need for our judgment in the application. There are also areas in which our judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result. However, certain of our accounting policies are particularly important to the portrayal of our financial position and results of operations and we may use significant judgment in the application; as a result, they are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. In applying those policies, we use our judgment to determine the appropriate assumptions to be used in the determination of certain estimates. Those estimates are based on historical experience, observation of trends in the industry, and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. For a more detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to our consolidated financial statements included in this report.

Oil and Gas Properties

We follow the full-cost method of accounting under which all costs associated with property acquisition, exploration and development activities are capitalized. We also capitalize internal costs that can be directly identified with our acquisition, exploration and development activities and do not include costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities.

Proved properties are amortized using thereporting units of production method (UOP). Currently we only have operations in the Unites States of America. The UOP calculation multiplies the percentage of estimated proved reserves produced each quarter by the cost of these reserves. The amortization base in the UOP calculation includes the sum of proved property, net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A), estimated future development costs (future costs to access and develop proved reserves) and asset retirement costs, less related salvage value.

The cost of unproved properties are excluded from the amortization calculation until it is determined whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to such properties or until development projects are placed into service. Geological and geophysical costs not associated with specific properties are recorded as proved property immediately. Unproved properties are reviewed for impairment quarterly.

Under the full cost method of accounting, the net book value of oil and gas properties, less deferred income taxes, may not exceed a calculated “ceiling.” The ceiling limitation is (a) the present value of future net revenues computed by applying current prices of oil & gas reserves (with consideration of price changes only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to estimated future production of proved oil & gas reserves as of the date of the latest balance sheet presented, less estimated future expenditures (based on current costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves computed using a discount factor of 10 percent and assuming continuation of existing economic conditionsplus (b) the cost of properties not being amortizedplus (c) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the costs being amortizedless (d) income tax effects related to differences between book and tax basis of properties. Future cash outflows associated with settling accrued retirement obligations are excluded from the calculation. Estimated future cash flows are calculated using end-of-period costs and an unweighted arithmetic average of commodity prices in effect on the first day of each of the previous 12 months held flat for the life of the production, except where prices are defined by contractual arrangements.

Any excess of the net book value of proved oil and gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, over the ceiling is charged to expense and reflected as additional DD&A in the statement of operations. The ceiling calculation is performed quarterly. For the year ended December 31, 2016, impairment charges of $8,032,670 were recorded. For the year ended December 31, 2017, no impairment charges were recorded.existed for the recorded goodwill of $3,108,000 or the related finite-intangibles assets of $440,000.

 

Proceeds from the sale or disposition of oil and gas properties are accounted for as a reduction to capitalized costs unless a significant portion (greater than 25%) of our reserve quantities are sold, in which case a gain or loss is recognized in income.

Asset Retirement Obligations

The asset retirement obligation relates to the plug and abandonment costs when our wells are no longer useful. We determine the value of the liability by obtaining quotes for this service and estimate the increase we will face in the future. We then discount the future value based on an intrinsic interest rate that is appropriate for us. If costs rise more than what we have expected there could be additional charges in the future however we monitor the costs of the abandoned wells and we will adjust this liability if necessary.

Share-Based PaymentsCompensation Awards

 

The value we assign to the options and warrants that we issue is based on the fair market value as calculated by the Black-Scholes pricing model. To perform a calculation of the value of our options, and warrants, we determine an estimate of the volatility of our stock.  We need to estimate volatility because there has not been enough trading of our stock to determine an appropriate measure of volatility. We believe our estimate of volatility is reasonable, and we review the assumptions used to determine this whenever we issue a new equity instruments.  If we have a material error in our estimate of the volatility of our stock, our expenses could be understated or overstated.

 40

Recent Issued Accounting Standards

See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Recent Issued Accounting Standards, to our consolidated financial statements included in this report.

Effects of Inflation and Pricing

The oil and gas industry is very cyclical and the demand for goods and services of oil and gas field companies, suppliers and others associated with the industry puts extreme pressure on the economic stability and pricing structure within the industry. Material changes in prices impact revenue stream, estimates of future reserves, borrowing base calculations of bank loans and value of properties in purchase and sale transactions. Material changes in prices can impact the value of oil and gas companies and their ability to raise capital, borrow money and retain personnel. We anticipate business costs and the demand for services related to production and exploration will fluctuate while the commodity price for oil and gas remains volatile.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

Management Responsibility for Financial Information

We are responsible for the preparation, integrity and fair presentation of our financial statements and the other information that appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and include estimates based on our best judgment.

We maintain a comprehensive system of internal controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance, at an appropriate cost-benefit relationship, that our financial information is accurate and reliable, our assets are safeguarded and our transactions are executed in accordance with established procedures.  

RBSM LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, is retained to audit our consolidated financial statements. Its accompanying report is based on audits conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).

Our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, and other information required by this Item 8 are included in this report beginning on page F-1.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our Interim Chief Executive Officer, Louis G. Schott, and our Interim Chief Financial Officer, Robert Schleizer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Report pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b). Based on the evaluation, Mr. Schott and Mr. Schleizer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. These internal controls are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the reported financial information is presented fairly, that disclosures are adequate and that the judgments inherent in the preparation of financial statements are reasonable. There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal control, including the possibility of human error and overriding of controls. Consequently, an effective internal control system can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance, with respect to reporting financial information. 

 41

Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2017. Such conclusion reflects the termination of our financial reporting staff during 2017. Until we are able to remedy these weaknesses, we are relying on third party consultants to assist with financial reporting.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Effective August 17, 2017, Robert Schleizer was appointed as Interim Chief Financial Officer and principal accounting/financial officer of the Company. He replaced Douglas M. Wright who resigned to pursue other business opportunities.

Other than the above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.   

None.

 42

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Information in response to this item is incorporated by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2018 Annual Stockholder Meeting of Stockholders filed 120 days after December 31, 2017.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Information in response to this item is incorporated by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2018 Annual Stockholder Meeting of Stockholders filed 120 days after December 31, 2017.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

Information in response to this item is incorporated by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2018 Annual Stockholder Meeting of Stockholders filed 120 days after December 31, 2017.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

Information in response to this item is incorporated by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2018 Annual Stockholder Meeting of Stockholders filed 120 days after December 31, 2017.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

Information in response to this item is incorporated by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2018 Annual Stockholder Meeting of Stockholders filed 120 days after December 31, 2017.

 43

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

The following information required under this item is filed as part of this report:

99.Financial Statements

Page
Management Responsibility for Financial Information44
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting45
Index to Financial StatementsF-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmsF-2
Consolidated Balance SheetsF-4
Consolidated Statements of OperationsF-5
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders EquityF-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsF-7

2. Financial Statement Schedules

None.

3. Exhibit Index

Exhibit
No.
Description
2.1Agreement and Plan of Merger between Millennium Plastics Corporation and Midwest Energy, Inc. filed on August 16, 2006. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2006)
2.2Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Registrant, BRE Merger Sub, Inc., Black Raven Energy, Inc. and West Coast Opportunity Fund, LLC dated July 23, 2013 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 on Form 8-K filed July 29, 2013)
2.3Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of October 19, 2017, by and among EnerJex Resources, Inc., AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., and AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 20, 2017).
3.1Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2008)
3.2Amended and Restated Bylaws, as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Appendix C to Schedule 14A filed on June 6, 2013)
3.3Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation as filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on  May 29, 2014 (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 3.1 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on May 29, 2014)
3.4Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 3.1 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on May 29, 2014)
3.5Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation for Series A Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Form S-1/A filed on June 3, 2014)
3.6Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.1 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2015)
3.7Certificate of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on April 27, 2017 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2018)
4.1Specimen common stock certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Form S-1/A filed on May 27, 2008)
4.2Specimen Series A Preferred Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Form S-1/A filed on June 3, 2014)
4.3Specimen Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Certificate (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.2 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2015)
4.4Certificate of Designation for Series A Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2011).
4.5Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.3 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2015)

 44

4.6Form of Placement Agent Warrant (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.4 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2015)
10.1Form of Officer and Director Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2008)
10.2Amendment 4 to Joint Exploration Agreement effective as of November 6, 2008 between MorMeg, LLC and EnerJex Resources, Inc.  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Form 10-K filed July 14, 2009)
10.3Amendment 5 to Joint Exploration Agreement effective as of December 31, 2009 between MorMeg LLC and EnerJex Resources, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Form 10-Q filed on February 16, 2010)
10.4Amendment 6 to Joint Exploration Agreement effective as of March 31, 2010 between MorMeg LLC and EnerJex Resources, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Form 10-K filed on July 15, 2010)
10.5Amended and Restated EnerJex Resources, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2008)

10.6Joint Development Agreement between EnerJex Resources, Inc. and Haas Petroleum, LLC dated December 31, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2011).
10.7Joint Operating Agreement between EnerJex Resources, Inc. and Haas Petroleum, LLC and MorMeg, LLC dated December 31, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2011).
10.8Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated October 3, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed on October 6, 2011).
10.9Option and Joint Development Agreement by and among Registrant and MorMeg, LLC dated August 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed on November 15, 2011).
10.10First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated December 14, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on Form 8-K filed on December 14, 2011).
10.11Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated August 31, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed on November 8, 2012).
10.12Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated November 2, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on Form 8-K filed on November 8, 2012).
10.13Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and among Registrant and Robert G. Watson, Jr. dated December 31, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2013).
10.14Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank dated December 31, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on Form 8-K filed on January 30, 2013).
10.15First Amendment to Amended & Restated Mortgage Security Agreement, Financing Statement and Assignment of Production by and among Working Interest, LLC and Texas Capital Bank dated December 31, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 on Form 8-K filed on January 30, 2013).
10.16Mortgage, Security Agreement, Financing Statement and Assignment of Production and Revenues by and among Working Interest, LLC and Texas Capital Bank dated December 31, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 on Form 8-K filed on January 30, 2013).
10.172013 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on June 12, 2013)
10.18Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated September 30, 2013 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed October 1, 2013).
10.19Sixth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated November 19, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 on Form 10-Q filed May 13, 2014).
10.20Exchange Agreement between EnerJex Resources, Inc. and holders of Series A preferred stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 on Form S-1/A Amendment No. 2 filed June 3, 2014).
10.21Seventh Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated May 22, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed May 27, 2014).
10.22Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 11, 2015 (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.1 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2015)
10.23Eighth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated August 13, 2014 (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.23 on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2015).
10.24Ninth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated April 29, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed May 5, 2015).
10.25Purchase Agreement by and among Registrant and Northland Securities, Inc. dated May 8, 2015 (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 1.1 of Form 8-K filed May 8, 2015.)
10.26Tenth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated September 8, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of Form 10-Q filed November 16, 2015).
10.27Eleventh Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated November 16, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed November 16, 2015).
10.28Forbearance Agreement dated April 4, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed June 3, 2016).

 45

10.29Third Amendment to Forbearance Agreement dated July 29, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2016.
10.30Letter Agreement dated February 10, 2017, by and among Texas Capital Bank, N.A., Iberia Bank, PWCM Investment Company IC LLC, EnerJex Resources, Inc., EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, Black Raven Energy, Inc. and Adena, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2017).
10.31Loan Sale Agreement dated February 10, 2017, by and among Texas Capital Bank, N.A., Iberia Bank, PWCM Investment Company IC LLC, EnerJex Resources, Inc., EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, Black Raven Energy, Inc., and Adena, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2017).
10.32Consulting Agreement dated February 10, 2017, by and between Registrant and Douglas Wright (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2017).
10.33Employment Agreement dated February 10, 2017, by and between Registrant and Louis G. Schott (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2017).
10.34Separation and General Release Agreement dated February 10, 2017, by and between Registrant and Robert G. Watson, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2017).
10.35Form of Additional Issuance Agreement among Enerjex Resources, Inc. and Alpha Capital Anstalt effective as of April 27, 2017 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2017).
10.36Form of Services Agreement among EnerJex Resources, Inc., and Camber Energy, Inc. dated April 27, 2017 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2017).
10.37Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated May 10, 2017, by and among the Registrant, EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Raven Energy, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, Adena, LLC, Working Interest, LLC, Kansas Holdings, LLC and Cortland Capital Market Services LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2017).
10.38Amended and Restated Note dated May 10, 2017, by and among the Registrant, EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Raven Energy, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, Adena, LLC, Working Interest, LLC, Kansas Holdings, LLC and Cortland Capital Market Services LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2017).
10.39Guaranty of Recourse Carveouts dated May 10, 2017, by and between the Registrant and Cortland Capital Market Services LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2017).
10.40Secured Promissory Note dated July 14, 2017, by Registrant and Alpha Capital Anstalt (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2017).
10.41Voting Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2017, by and among EnerJex Resources, Inc. and a principal stockholder of AgEagle (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 20, 2017).
10.42Private Placement Commitment Letter Agreement dated November 21, 2017 by and among the Company and Alpha Capital Anstalt (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the Form S-4 Registration Statement filed with the SEC on November 22, 2017).
10.43Private Placement Agreement dated as of November 21, 2017, by and among EnerJex Resources, Inc. and Alpha Capital Anstalt (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 27, 2017).
10.44Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of December 20, 2017, by and between EnerJex Resources, Inc. and the Purchaser thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 22, 2017).
10.45First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated December 22, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 29, 2017).
10.46Second Amended and Restated Note December 22, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 29, 2017).
10.47Letter Agreement dated January 31, 2018 from EnerJex Resources, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 6, 2018).
21.1Subsidiaries*
23.1Consent of Cobb & Associates, Inc.*
31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
31.2Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
32.2Certificate of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
99.1Cobb & Associates Letter Report dated*
101.INSXBRL Instance Document*
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document*
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document*
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document*

* Filed herewith.

** Furnished herewith.

 46

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this amended report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ENERJEX RESOURCES, INC.
By:/s/ Louis G. Schott

Louis G. Schott 

Interim Chief Executive Officer 

(Principal Executive Officer) 

Date: March 23, 2018

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

NameTitleDate
/s/ Louis G. SchottInterim Chief Executive Officer,March 23, 2018
Louis G. Schott(Principal Executive Officer), Secretary
/s/ Robert SchleizerInterim Chief Financial OfficerMarch 23, 2018
Robert Schleizer (Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)
/s/ Ryan A. LoweDirectorMarch 23, 2018
Ryan A. Lowe
/s/ Lance W. HelfertDirectorMarch 23, 2018
Lance Helfert
/s/ James G. MillerDirectorMarch 23, 2018
James G. Miller
/s/ Richard E. MenchacaDirectorMarch 23, 2018
Richard E. Menchaca

 47

Index to Financial Statements

Page
Index to Financial StatementsF-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016F-4
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity for the Year Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016F-5
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-7

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To The Board of Directors and Stockholders of 

EnerJex Resources Inc. 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of EnerJex Resources, Inc. (the “Company”), as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2017 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The Company's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, generated negative cash flows from operating activities, has an accumulated deficit and has stated that substantial doubt exists about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management's evaluation of the events and conditions and management’s plans in regarding these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

//s// RBSM, LLP 

New York, New York

March 23, 2018

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014

New York | Washington, DC | California | Nevada 

China | India | Greece 

Member ANTEA INTERNATIONAL with offices worldwide


EnerJex Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
       
Assets        
Current Assets:        
Cash unrestricted $677,936  $128,035 
Restricted cash     50,000 
Accounts receivable  143,799   600,255 
Derivative receivable     10,570 
Inventory     185,733 
Marketable securities     210,990 
Deposits and prepaid expenses  223,648   493,384 
Total current assets  1,045,383   1,678,967 
         
Non-current assets:        
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation of $618,661 and $1,817,711  178,115   2,077,055 
Oil & gas properties using full cost accounting, net of accumulated DD&A of $8,597,539 and $15,189,716  1,411,225   3,437,030 
Other non-current assets     798,809 
Total non-current assets  1,589,340   6,312,894 
Total assets $2,634,723  $7,991,861 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders’ (Deficit)        
         
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $217,941  $294,241 
Accrued liabilities  1,034,827   1,535,165 
Current portion of long term debt  4,876,903   17,925,000 
Total current liabilities  6,129,671   19,754,406 
         
Non-Current Liabilities:        
Asset retirement obligation  1,611,845   3,314,191 
Other long-term liabilities  6,919,579   3,401,149 
Total non-current liabilities  8,531,424   6,715,340 
Total liabilities  14,661,095   26,469,746 
         
Commitments and Contingencies        
         
Stockholders’ (Deficit):        
10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, $.001 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 1,999,998 and 938,248 shares issued and outstanding, respectively  2,000   938 
Series B Convertible Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 1,764 shares authorized, 352 and 1,764 issued and outstanding, respectively  1   2 
Series C Convertible Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 500 shares authorized, 300 and 0 issued and outstanding, respectively  1    
Series C Convertible Preferred stock issuable  200,000    
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 16,294,891 and 8,423,936 shares issued and outstanding, respectively  16,295   8,424 
Paid in capital  74,185,091   69,090,613 
Accumulated deficit  (86,429,760)  (87,577,862)
Total stockholders’ (deficit)  (12,026,372)  (18,477,885)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ (deficit) $2,634,723  $7,991,861 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 F-3

EnerJex Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
       
Crude oil revenues $1,309,496  $2,390,024 
Natural gas revenues  19,509   71,703 
Total revenues  1,329,005   2,461,727 
         
Expenses:        
Direct operating costs  1,363,946   2,661,258 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  346,197   413,967 
Impairment of oil and gas assets     8,032,670 
Professional fees  1,390,512   310,471 
Salaries  350,863   1,723,789 
Administrative expense  545,267   458,375 
Total expenses  3,996,785   13,600,530 
Loss from operations  (2,667,780)  (11,138,803)
         
Other income (expense):        
Interest expense  (1,250,191)  (1,911,906)
Gain on loan sale agreement  11,500,124    
(Loss) on mark to market of derivative contracts     (2,531,401)
Other income  692,879   2,406,340 
Total other income (expense)  10,942,812   (2,036,967)
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes  8,275,032   (13,175,770)
Provision for income taxes      
         
Net income (loss) $8,275,032  $(13,175,770)
         
Net income (loss) $8,275,032  $(13,175,770)
Beneficial Conversion on Series C Preferred Stock  (208,500)   
Deemed dividend for anti-dilution provision  (3,400,000)   
Preferred dividends  (3,518,430)  (3,010,211)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders $1,148,102  $(16,185,981)
Net income (loss) per common share basic $0.11  $(1.92)
Weighted average shares basic  10,503,070   8,423,936 
Net income (loss) per common share diluted $0.11  $(1.92)
Weighted average shares diluted  10,503,070   8,423,936 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


EnerJex Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ (Deficit)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

                                             
   10% Series A   Series B Series C     Series C        Total 
   Preferred Stock  Preferred Stock Preferred
Stock
  Common Stock  Preferred
Stock
  Paid In  Retained  Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount Shares Amount  Shares  Amount  Issuable  Capital  Deficit  (Deficit) 
Balance, January 1, 2016  938,248  938   1,764  2  —   —    8,423,936   $8,424   $—    $68,848,944  (71,391,881)  $(2,533,573)
Stock based compensation  —    —    —    —    —   —    —    —    —    241,669   —    241,669 
Preferred stock dividends  —    —    —    —   —    —    —    —    —    —    (3,010,211)  (3,010,211)
Net loss for the year  —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —    (13,175,770)  (13,175,770)
Balance, December 31, 2016  938,248   938   1,764   2  —   —    8,423,936   8,424   —    69,090,613   (87,577,862)  (18,477,885)
Stock based compensation                                    13,690       13,690 
Preferred stock dividends                                        (3,518,430)  (3,518,430)
Common stock issued for anti-dilution provision                        597,461   597       299,403  (300,000   
Warrants exercised                        1,771,428   1,772       529,658       531,430 
Sale of series A preferred stock  1,061,750   1,062                             648,729       649,791 
Sale of series C preferred stock                 300   1               299,999       300,000 
Series C preferred stock issuable                                200,000           200,000 
Conversion of series B preferred stock          (1,412)  (1)        5,502,066   5,502       (5,501)       
Beneficial conversion feature                                    208,500   (208,500)   
Deemed dividend for anti-dilution provision                                    3,100,000   (3,100,000)   
Net income for the year                                        8,275,032   8,275,032 
Balance, December 31, 2017  1,999,998  $2,000   352  $1  300  $1   16,294,891  $16,295  $200,000  $74,185,091  $(86,429,760) $(12,026,372)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 F-5

EnerJex Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Cash flows from operating activities        
Net income (loss) $8,275,032  $(13,175,770)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) (used in) operating activities:        
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  234,135   413,967 
Write-off of inventory  71,982    
Amortization of deferred financing costs  223,790     
Impairment of oil and gas assets     8,032,670 
Stock, options and warrants issued for services  13,690   241,669 
Accretion of asset retirement obligation  112,062   225,480 
Settlement of asset retirement obligations     (2,767)
(Gain) loss on derivatives     2,520,831 
Gain on loan sale agreement, net of cash  (11,500,124)   
Changes in current assets and liabilities        
Accounts receivable  105,772   377,233 
Inventory  (15,943)  (41,406)
Deposits and prepaid expenses  252,478   (246,059)
Accounts payable  (94,783)  (848,601)
Accrued liabilities  1,080,420   404,108 
Cash flows used in operating activities  (1,241,489)  (2,098,645)
         
Cash flows from investing activities        
Purchase of fixed assets     (241,683)
Oil and gas properties additions  (4,632)  (17,089)
Increase in restricted cash     (50,000)
Cash flows (used in) investing activities  (4,632)  (308,772)
         
Cash flows from financing activities        
Proceeds from sale of stock and warrant exercise  1,681,221    
Proceeds from borrowings  225,000    
Repayments of long-term debt  (67,653)  (686,660)
Bank account transfer on loan sale agreement  (92,546)   
Cash released from restricted cash  50,000    
Deferred financing costs     120,430 
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities  1,796,022  (566,230)
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  549,901  (2,973,647)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning  128,035   3,101,682 
Cash and cash equivalents, end $677,936  $128,035 
         
Supplemental disclosures:        
Interest paid $  $922,072 
Income taxes paid $  $ 
Non-cash investing and financing activities:        
Beneficial conversion feature on Series C preferred stock accounted as preferred dividend $208,500    
Common stock issued for anti-dilution provision $597    
Conversion of Series B preferred stock into common stock $5,502    
Share-based payments issued for services $13,690  $241,669 
Payroll liability converted to note payable $113,750    
Non-cash note payable issued in conjunction with the LSA $105,806    
Deemed dividend for anti-dilution provision $3,400,000    
Preferred dividends payable $3,518,430  $3,010,211 
Loan settled and exchanged with assets including oil and gas properties and liabilities  $13,425,000    

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


EnerJex Resources, Inc.

For the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 - Summary of Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Our operations are considered to fall within a single industry segment, which are the acquisition, development, exploitation and production of crude oil and natural gas properties in the United States.  Our consolidated financial statements include our wholly-owned subsidiaries.

All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.  Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year financial statements to conform to the current year presentation. 

Nature of Business

We are an independent energy company engaged in the business of producing and selling crude oil and natural gas. The crude oil and natural gas is obtained primarily by the acquisition and subsequent exploration and development of mineral leases.  Development and exploration may include drilling new exploratory or development wells on these leases. These operations are conducted primarily in Kansas.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Significant estimates included in the consolidated financial statements are: (1) oil and gas revenues and reserves; (2) depreciation, depletion and amortization; (3) valuation allowances associated with income taxes (4) accrued assets and liabilities; (5) stock-based compensation; (6) asset retirement obligations, (7) valuation of derivative instruments and (8) impairment of oil and gas assets.  Although management believes these estimates are reasonable, changes in facts and circumstances or discovery of new information may result in revised estimates.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Trade Accounts Receivable

Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear any interest.  We regularly review receivables to insure that the amounts will be collected and establish or adjust an allowance for uncollectible amounts as necessary using the specific identification method.  Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.

Inventory

Inventories are comprised of crude oil held in storage and materials and supplies used in field operations. Crude oil inventories are valued at lower of cost or market, on a first-in, first out basis. Material and supplies are valued at lower of cost or market, based upon specific cost or by using a weighted average cost.

Share-Based Payments

The value we assign to the options and warrants that we issue is based on the fair market value as calculated by the Black-Scholes pricing model. To perform a calculation of the value of our options and warrants, we determine an estimate of the volatility of our stock. We need to estimate volatility because there has not been enough trading of our stock to determine an appropriate measure of volatility. We believe our estimate of volatility is reasonable, and we review the assumptions used to determine this whenever we issue new equity instruments. If we have a material error in our estimate of the volatility of our stock, our expenses could be understated or overstated. All share-based awards are expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the options.

 

Income Taxes

 

IncomeWe are required to estimate our income taxes, are accounted for underwhich includes estimating our current income taxes as well as measuring the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized when items of income and expense are recognized in the financial statements in different periods than when recognized in the applicable tax return. Deferred tax assets arise when expenses are recognized in the financial statements before the tax returns or when income items are recognized in the tax return prior to the financial statements. Deferred tax assets also arise when operating losses or tax credits are available to offset tax payments due in future years. Deferred tax liabilities arise when income items are recognized in the financial statements before the tax returns or when expenses are recognized in the tax return prior to the financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences resulting from different treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. We currently have significant deferred assets, which are expectedsubject to be recovered or settled. The effect onperiodic recoverability assessments. Realizing our deferred tax assets principally depends on our achieving projected future taxable income. We may change our judgments regarding future profitability due to future market conditions and liabilities ofother factors, which may result in recording a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the date when the change in the tax rate was enacted.


We routinely assess the reliability of ourvaluation allowance against those deferred tax assets.  If we conclude that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized under accounting standards, the tax asset is reduced by a valuation allowance.  In addition we routinely assess uncertain tax positions, and accrue for tax positions that are not more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities.

 

Uncertain Tax PositionsResults of Operations

 

We follow guidance in Topic 740 of the Codification for its accounting for uncertain tax positions. Topic 740 prescribes guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. To recognize a tax position, we determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation, based solely on the technical merits of the position. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the financial statements. The amount of tax benefit recognized with respect to any tax position is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement.

We have no liability for unrecognized tax benefits recorded as ofYear Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Accordingly, there is no amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate and there is no amount of interest or penalties currently recognized in the consolidated statement of operations or consolidated balance sheet2021 as ofCompared to Year Ended December 31, 2017. In addition, we do not believe that there are any positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months. We recognize related interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense.2020

Tax years open for audit by federal tax authorities as of December 31, 2017 are the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016. Tax years ending prior to 2014 are open for audit to the extent that net operating losses generated in those years are being carried forward or utilized in an open year.

Fair Value Measurements

Accounting guidance establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value based upon the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and creates a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions.  Additional disclosures are required, including disclosures of fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy.  We incorporate a credit risk assumption into the measurement of certain assets and liabilities.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investment instruments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents for purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows and other statements. We maintain cash on deposit, which, can exceeds federally insured limits. We have not experienced any losses on such accounts and believe we are not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and equivalents.

Revenue Recognition

Oil and gas revenues are recognized net of royalties when production is sold to a purchaser at a fixed or determinable price, when delivery has occurred and title has transferred, and if collection of the revenue is probable. Cash received relating to future revenues is deferred and recognized when all revenue recognition criteria are met.

Fixed Assets

Property and equipment are recorded at cost.

At December 31, 2017, Fixed Assets consisted of furniture and equipment of $773,707 and building and leasehold improvements of $23,069, as well as accumulated depreciation of furniture and fixtures of $597,692 and accumulated depreciation of building and leasehold improvements of $20,969.

At December 31, 2016, Fixed Assets consisted of vehicles $355,886, furniture and equipment of $795,563, building and leasehold improvements of $23,069 and gathering and compression systems of $2,720,247, as well as accumulated depreciation of vehicles of $336,083, accumulated depreciation of furniture and fixtures of $532,190, accumulated depreciation of building and leasehold improvements of $17,515 and accumulated depreciation of gathering and compression systems of $931,923. 


Depreciation is determined by the use of the straight-line method of accounting using the estimated lives of the assets (3-15 years).  Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense.

Debt issue costs

Debt issuance costs incurred are capitalized and subsequently amortized over the term of the related debt utilizing the straight-line method of amortization over the estimated life of the debt.

Oil & Gas Properties and Long-Lived Assets

We follow the full cost method of accounting under which all costs associated with property acquisition, exploration and development activities are capitalized. We also capitalize internal costs that can be directly identified with our acquisition, exploration and development activities and do not include costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities.

Proved properties are amortized using the units of production method (UOP). Currently we only have operations in the United States of America. The UOP calculation multiplies the percentage of estimated proved reserves produced each quarter by the cost of these reserves. The amortization base in the UOP calculation includes the sum of proved property, net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A), estimated future development costs (future costs to access and develop proved reserves) and asset retirement costs, less related salvage value. 

The cost of unproved properties are excluded from the amortization calculation until it is determined whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to such properties or until development projects are placed into service. Geological and geophysical costs not associated with specific properties are recorded as proved property immediately. Unproved properties are reviewed for impairment quarterly.

Impairment of long-lived assets is recorded when indications of impairment are present. Impairment is indicated when the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying value.  The carrying value of the assets is then reduced to their estimated fair value that is measured based on an estimate of future discounted cash flows.

Under the full-cost-method of accounting, the net book value of oil and gas properties, less deferred income taxes, may not exceed a calculated “ceiling.” The ceiling limitation is (a) the present value of future net revenues computed by applying current prices of oil & gas reserves (with consideration of price changes only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to estimated future production of proved oil & gas reserves as of the date of the latest balance sheet presented, less estimated future expenditures (based on current costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves computed using a discount factor of 10 percent and assuming continuation of existing economic conditionsplus (b) the cost of properties not being amortizedplus (c) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the costs being amortizedless (d) income tax effects related to differences between book and tax basis of properties. Future cash outflows associated with settling accrued retirement obligations are excluded from the calculation. Estimated future cash flows are calculated using end-of-period costs and an un-weighted arithmetic average of commodity prices in effect on the first day of each of the previous 12 months held flat for the life of the production, except where prices are defined by contractual arrangements.

Any excess of the net book value of proved oil and gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, over the ceiling is charged to expense and reflected as additional DD&A in the statement of operations. The ceiling calculation is performed quarterly. For the year ended December 31, 2016 impairment charges of $8,032,6702021, revenues were recorded. For$9,760,952 as compared to $1,285,383 during the year ended December 31, 2017, no impairment charges were recorded.

Proceeds2020, an increase of $8,475,569, or 659%. The increase was primarily attributable to the new revenues derived from the sale or dispositionacquisition of oilMicaSense, Measure and gas properties aresenseFly businesses. The largest increase can be attributed to our strong sensor sales related specifically to the Altum™, RedEdge-MX™, and RedEdge-MX™ Blue, followed by new sales associated with ebee products. In addition, revenue growth was also positively impacted by increased sales of our SaaS subscription services related to the HempOverview, Ground Control and Atlas Flight platforms which accounted for as a reductionsubscription and licensing sales to capitalized costs unless a significant portion (greater than 25%) of our reserve quantities are sold, in which case a gain or loss is recognized in income. In 2015, the Company sold its Cherokee project assets located in Eastern Kansas for net proceeds of $2,867,305. At the time of the sale the reserve quantities made up approximately 6.7% of total reserve quantities. Accordingly, the net proceeds reduced the carrying value of our oil and gas properties.

On February 10, 2017, the Companyvarious enterprise customers and the other Sellers entered intostates of Iowa and completed the transactions contemplated by the LSA, described in greater detail in “Note 2 – Going Concern” – “Financing Transactions”.

Asset Retirement Obligations

The asset retirement obligation relates to the plug and abandonment costs when our wells are no longer useful. We determine the value of the liability by obtaining quotes for this service and estimate the increase we will face in the future. We then discount the future value based on an intrinsic interest rate that is appropriate for us. If costs rise more than what we have expected there could be additional charges in the future, however, we monitor the costs of the abandoned wells and we will adjust this liability if necessary.


Major Purchasers

For the years ended December 31, 2017, and 2016 we sold our produced crude oil to ARM Energy Management, LLC, Coffeyville Resources Inc., and Sunoco Logistics Inc. on a month-to-month basis and we sold our produced natural gas to United Energy Trading and Western Operating Company.

Marketable Securities Available for Sale

The Company classifies its marketable equity securities as available-for-sale and they are carried at fair market value at December 31, 2016, the carrying value of this security was $210,990. During 2017 the security was transferred as part of the LSA transaction (described below).

Net Income Per Common Share

Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect, in periods in which they have a dilutive effect, the impact of common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and warrants and conversion of convertible debt and preferred stock that are not deemed to be anti-dilutive. The dilutive effect of the outstanding stock options and warrants is computed using the treasury stock method.Florida.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2016, diluted net loss per share did not include the effect2021, cost of 298,664 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock optionssales was $5,504,708 as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been madecompared to prior periods to conform to current presentations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted by the Company

In July 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2017-11, “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part 1) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Non-public Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Non-controlling Interests with a Scope Exception” (“ASU 2017-11”). Part I relates to the accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features in Subtopic 815-40, which is considered in determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument qualifies for a scope exception from derivative accounting. Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced based on the pricing of future equity offerings. An entity still is required to determine whether instruments would be classified as equity under the guidance in Subtopic 815-40 in determining whether they qualify for that scope exception. If they do qualify, freestanding instruments with down round features are no longer classified as liabilities. ASU 2017-11 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted, including in an interim period. The Company early adopted ASU 2017-11 during the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company had nocumulative effect of the change in accounting principle on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the beginning of 2017.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Applicable to the Company

In May 2014, the FASB issued (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five- step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing GAAP. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The standard is required to be adopted using either the full retrospective approach, with all prior periods presented adjusted, or the modified retrospective approach, with a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings on the opening balance sheet. The Company plans to adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method applied to contracts that are not completed as of that date. The Company has not identified changes to its revenue recognition policies that would result in a material adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings on January 1, 2018. Adopting this guidance will result in increased disclosures related to revenue recognition policies and disaggregation of revenue in future disclosures in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. As allowed by the practical expedients under Topic 606, the Company does not plan to provide expanded disclosures with respect to the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts with variable consideration or with an original term of one year or less.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, a new lease standard requiring lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for most leases classified as operating leases under previous U.S. GAAP. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company will be required to use a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230). ASU 2016-15 seeks to reduce the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company plans to adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2018. The Company has not identified any changes that upon adoption will have a material effect on its cash flows.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting”, which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. ASU 2017-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, including adoption in any interim period for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The Company plans to adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2018. The Company has not identified any changes that upon adoption will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

The FASB issued ASU 2017-05, “Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic: 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and the Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets,” which helps filers determine the guidance applicable for gain/loss recognition subsequent to the adoption of ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments also clarify that the derecognition of all businesses except those related to conveyances of oil and gas rights or contracts with customers should be accounted for in accordance with the derecognition and deconsolidation guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation. The Company adopted the ASU on January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective transition method. Under this transition method the Company may elect to apply this guidance retrospectively either to all contracts at the date of initial application or only to contracts that are not completed contracts at the date of initial application. The Company elected to evaluate only contracts that are not completed contracts. As there were no not completed contracts at January 1, 2018, there was no impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures upon adoption.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted. The FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” which requires companies to recognize the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations of all leases with a term greater than 12 months (long-term) on the balance sheet. Leases to explore for or use minerals, oil and natural gas are not impacted by this guidance. In January 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-01, “Leases (Topic 842), Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842.” This ASU permits an entity to continue to apply its current accounting policy for land easements that existed before the effective date of Topic 842. Once an entity adopts Topic 842, it would apply that Topic prospectively to all new (or modified) land easements to determine whether the arrangement contains a lease. Topic 842 requires adoption by application of a modified retrospective transition approach and is effective for the Company on January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted.

The Company is in the process of reviewing its portfolio of leased assets and related contracts to determine the impact that adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company is also assessing the impact of Topic 842 on its systems, processes and internal controls. The Company plans to elect certain practical expedients when implementing the new lease standard, which means the Company will not have to reassess the existence or classification of leases for contracts, including land easements that commenced prior to adoption. The Company anticipates upon adoption to recognize assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations of its existing long-term operating leases on its consolidated balance sheets and to utilize new systems, processes and internal controls to properly identify, classify, measure and recognize new (or modified) leases after the date of adoption. The Company will complete its evaluation during 2018 and will adopt Topic 842 on January 1, 2019, using a modified retrospective approach for all comparative periods presented.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. This new standard clarifies the definition of a business and provides a screen to determine when an integrated set of assets and activities is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This new standard will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2018; however, early adoption is permitted with prospective application to any business development transaction.


Note 2 - Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company had an accumulated deficit at December 31, 2017 of $86,429,760. Also, cash used in operations was $1,241,489$711,650 for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020, an increase of $4,793,058, or 674%. We had a gross profit of $4,256,244, or 44% and $573,733 or 45%, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, a decrease in our profit margins of 2%. The abilityprimary factors contributing to the increase in our cost of sales and decrease in gross profit margin were (i) due to the increase in our cost of components and parts, and (ii) discontinuation of certain of our older sensors and airframes that the Company will no longer be able to sell due to lack of sourcing of certain critical components needed to produce these products.


For the year ended December 31, 2021, operating expenses were $34,549,016, as compared to $5,505,040 for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $29,043,976, or 528%. Operating expenses comprise general and administrative, professional fees, sales and marketing, and research and development, and goodwill impairment. For the year ended December 31, 2021, general and administrative expenses were $12,260,610 as compared to $2,732,274 for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $9,528,336, or 350%. The increase was primarily due to costs for additional payroll and bonus payments associated with new hires and existing employees for the MicaSense, Measure and senseFly acquisitions (“Business Acquisitions”), and stock compensation expenses related to employees and directors, ERP and related implementation costs, rent cost associated with our new leases for Wichita, Seattle, Washington D.C., Austin, Switzerland and Raleigh offices, and additional amortization expense associated with the intangibles acquired as part of the recent Business Acquisitions and platform development costs. For the year ended December 31, 2021, professional fees were $2,696,800 as compared to $2,703,371, a decrease of $6,571 for the year ended December 31, 2020, or less than 1%. This was mainly due to similar consulting, legal and stock-compensation costs as in the prior year. Also included in our operating expenses were sales and marketing costs that increased to $3,150,886 from $40,003 in the prior year's comparable period due to addition of the MicaSense, Measure and senseFly sales and marketing teams, hiring of additional employees and related business development consultants. Lastly, we recorded research and development expenses totaled $4,082,799 as compared to $29,392 for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $4,053,407, or 1,379%. The increase was mainly due to the MicaSense, Measure and senseFly acquisitions costs incurred for the development of new airframe, sensor and software technologies. We recorded a $12,357,921 goodwill impairment charge related to our SaaS reporting unit in the fourth quarter of 2021. The impairment charge considered lower than forecasted sales and profitability along with declining markets conditions and changes in our technologies.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, other income, net was $184,092 as compared to other expense, net of $1,143 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The change was primarily attributable to the loan owed under the Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP Loan") for AgEagle, offset by grant income for Measure contracts.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company incurred a net loss of $30,108,680 as compared to continuea net loss of $4,932,540 for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $25,176,230, or 510%. The overall increase in net loss was primarily attributable to greater operating and transactional costs as a going concernresult of the acquisitions. In addition, in order to achieve our long-term growth strategies additional resources and investments will be required as we continue to address these shifts by developing new platforms, products and services that support prevailing growth opportunities.

Cash Flows

Year ended December 31, 2021 as Compared to the Year ended December 31, 2020

As of December 31, 2021, cash on hand was $14,590,566, a decrease of $9,349,767, or 39%, as compared to $23,940,333 as of December 31, 2020. For the year ended December 31, 2021, cash used in operations $12,463,128, an increase of $10,206,556, as compared to $2,256,571 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in cash used in operating activities was mainly driven by an increase in operating loss due to greater overhead expenses along with an increase in accrued expenses related to issuance of Common stock and accrued liabilities for the MicaSense, Measure and senseFly acquisitions.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, cash used in investing activities was $42,497,624, an increase of $41,718,601, as compared to $779,023 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in cash used in our investing activities resulted from the acquisitions of MicaSense, Measure and senseFly acquisitions, purchase of property and equipment and building improvements related to the new leased warehouse and corporate offices in Wichita, along with recording capitalized costs associated with the development of the HempOverview and Measure Ground Control platforms.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, cash provided by financing activities was $45,610,984, an increase of $19,353,054, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in cash provided by our financing activities was due to sales of our Common stock and the exercise of warrants issued in connection with a securities purchase agreement dated August 4, 2020 and the ATM, in connection with the Company’s ATM Offering.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2021, we had working capital of $5,846,546. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we incurred a loss from operations of $30,292,772, inclusive of $12,357,921 for goodwill impairment, an increase of $25,361,465, as compared to $4,931,307 for the year ended December 31, 2020. While there can be no guarantees, we believe the cash on hand, in connection with cash generated from revenue, will be sufficient to fund the next twelve months of operations. In addition, we intend to pursue other opportunities of raising capital with outside investors.

35

For the year ended December 31, 2021, we raised capital of $6,613,943 as a result of the sale of 1,057,214 shares of Common Stock in connection with a securities purchase agreement (the "December Purchase Agreement") entered on December 31, 2020. Also on February 8, 2021, we received $8,305,368 in additional gross proceeds associated with the exercise of 2,516,778 of warrants issued at a price of $3.30 per share in connection with a securities purchase agreement dated August 4, 2020. During the period from May 26, 2021 through December 31, 2021, we raised $30,868,703 of net proceeds from our ATM Offering with co-agents Stifel, Nicolaus &Company, Incorporated and Raymond James & Associates.

The Company has continued to realize losses from operations. However, because of our capital raise efforts, we believe that we will have sufficient cash to meet our anticipated operating costs and capital expenditure requirements through December 2022. Our primary need for liquidity is dependent upon itsto fund working capital requirements of our business, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service, and for general corporate purposes. Our primary source of liquidity is funds generated by financing activities and from private placements. Our ability to successfully accomplish the plans described below. The accompanying consolidatedfund our operations, to make planned capital expenditures, to make planned acquisitions, to make scheduled debt payments, and to repay or refinance indebtedness depends on our future operating performance and cash flows, which are subject to prevailing economic conditions and financial, statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary ifbusiness and other factors, some of which are beyond our control.

If the Company is unable to continue asgenerate significant sales growth in the near term and raise additional capital, there is a going concern.

Merger Agreement

On October 19, 2017,risk that the Company entered into an Agreementcould default on additional obligations; and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“AgEagle”), which designs, develops, produces, and distributes technologically advanced small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV or drones) that are supplied to the agriculture industry, and AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”). Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will be merged with and into AgEagle, Merger Sub will cease to exist and AgEagle will survive as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”). The respective boards of directors of the Company and AgEagle have approved the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.

At the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), the shares of AgEagle capital stock will be automatically converted into the right to receive equal to 85% of the then issued and outstanding capital stock of the Company on a fully diluted basis. In addition, at the Effective Time all outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares of AgEagle common stock will be assumed by the Company and converted into options and warrants to purchase shares of Company common stock. No fractional shares of Company common stock will be issued in the Merger but will be rounded to the nearest whole share. Following the consummation of the Merger, former stockholders of AgEagle with respect to the Merger are expected to own 85% of the Company’s outstanding common stock (inclusive of the AgEagle assumed stock options and warrants), and current common and Series A Preferred stockholders of the Company are expected to own 15% of the Company, excluding shares of common stock that may be issued in connection with the conversion of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock, and not including any additional shares which may be issued in connection with the Company’s closing obligation to provide up to $4 million in new working capital and the elimination of all liabilities currently on the Company’s balance sheet.

In connection with the Merger, the Company will also file a proxy statement seeking stockholder approval to: (a) amend the terms of its Series A Preferred Stock (as discussed below); (b) approve the issuance of the Company’s shares in connection with the Merger to the AgEagle shareholders and new investors, in excess of 19.9% of the Company’s total issued and outstanding shares of common stock; (c) approve the issuance of shares to current Company management and directors in lieu of deferred salary and fees, a majority of which will be held in escrow to secure the Company’s indemnity obligations under the Merger Agreement; and (d) change the name of the Company to “AgEagle Aerial Resources, Inc.” 

The Merger Agreement provides that, immediately following the Effective Time, the existing board of directors and officers of the Company will resign and new directors and officers will be appointed by AgEagle.

The Company intends to dispose of its principal assets, consisting primarily of its Kansas oil and gas properties, concurrently with the closing of the Merger. In the event the Merger is not consummated, the Company does not have a present intention to dispose of the above described assets.

The completion of the Merger is subject to various customary conditions, including, among other things: (a) the approval of the stockholders of the Company and AgEagle (which Company shareholder approval has been received to date); (b) the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by each of the Company and AgEagle and the compliance by each of the Company and AgEagle with their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement; (c) approval of the stockholders of the Company for the issuance of its common stock and any other securities (x) to the AgEagle stockholders in connection with the Merger and (y) in connection with the financing transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; (d) approval for the listing of shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued in the Merger and other related transactions on the NYSE American; and (e) that all of the Company’s assets as disclosed shall have been sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of and the corresponding debt and liabilities shall have been extinguished. The Company’s existing cash resources are insufficient to satisfy all of its outstanding liabilities. Accordingly, in order to satisfy the condition and consummate the Merger, the Company willcould be required to raise additional funding prior todiscontinue or significantly reduce the closing of the Merger, the failure of which could result in the Company’s failure to consummate the Merger Agreement.

F-12

The Merger Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, including covenants obligating each of the Company and AgEagle to continue to conduct its respective business in the ordinary course, to provide reasonable access to each other’s information and to use reasonable best efforts to cooperate and coordinate to make any filings or submissions that are required to be made under any applicable laws or requested to be made by any government authority in connection with the Merger. The Merger Agreement also contains a customary “no solicitation” provision pursuant to which, prior to the earlier of January 31, 2018, or the completion or termination of the Merger, neither the Company nor AgEagle may solicit or engage in discussions with any third party regarding another acquisition proposal unless, in the Company’s case, it has received an unsolicited, bona fide written proposal that the recipient’s board of directors determines is or would reasonably be expected to result in a superior proposal. The Company has paid AgEagle a $50,000 non-refundable fee at the signing of the Merger Agreement. The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights in favor of each of the Company and AgEagle.

In addition, the Merger Agreement contains provisions for indemnification in the event of any damages suffered by either party as a result of breaches of representations and warranties contained therein. The aggregate maximum indemnification obligation of any indemnifying party for damages with respect to breaches of representations and warranties set forth in the Merger Agreement shall not exceed, in the aggregate, $350,000, other than for fraud, intentional misrepresentation or willful breach. An indemnifying party shall satisfy its indemnification obligations with shares of Company common stock equal to the aggregate amount of losses of the indemnified party, calculated based upon the greater of (i) the value of the Company common stock as of the closing of the Merger; and (ii) the average closing price of the Company common stock on the NYSE American for the five trading days immediately prior to the date such a claim is made. The Company has agreed to deposit an aggregate of 1,215,278 shares of common stock to be issued to current officers and directors of the Company in lieu of deferred salary and fees into escrow to secure its indemnification obligations, the issuance of such shares requiring the approval of the Company’s common stockholders.

In connection with, and as a condition to the closing of the Merger, the Company is seeking the consent of the holderscope of its Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) to amend the terms thereof to: (i) allow the Company to pay all accrued but unpaid dividends up to September 30, 2017 in additional sharesoperations if no other means of Series A Preferred Stock based on the value of the liquidation preference thereof, (ii) eliminate the right of the Series A Preferred Stock holders to receive any dividends accruing after September 30, 2017, and (iii) convert each share of Series A Preferred Stock into 10 shares of Company common stock. An affirmative vote of 66.7% of all shares of Series A Preferred Stock voting as a class as of the record date of the proxy statement is required to amend the terms of the Certificate of Designation to provide for these changes, as required under the Merger Agreement. As of September 30, 2017, the Series A Preferred Stock had accrued a total of $6,039,972 in accrued but unpaid dividends, which would result in an additional 241,599 shares of Series A Preferred Stock being issued by the Company to satisfy these accrued dividends.

financing operations are available. The Merger Agreement provides either party the right to terminate the Merger if it has not been consummated by January 31, 2018, provided that if all of the conditions to closing shall have been satisfied or shall be capable of being satisfied at such time, the required closing date may be extended until March 31, 2018. On January 31, 2018, the Company extended the required closing date with AgEagle to March 31, 2018.

On November 21, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt (“Alpha”) signed a binding commitment letter with the Company to provide prior to or at the closing of the Merger, a minimum of $4 million in new equity capital at a pre-money valuation of between $16 million and $25 million (the “Private Placement”). Per the terms of this commitment letter, in the event any unaffiliated third parties of EnerJex participate in the Private Placement, Alpha’s obligations to fund the Private Placement shall be reduced by such aggregate gross dollar amount funded by such unaffiliated third parties. Alpha has also agreed to convert all notes they hold from the Company into equity at the closing of the Merger. For their funding commitment, Alpha will receive a fee equal to 2.5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock on a fully diluted basis payable at the closing of the Merger. Alpha’s obligations to fund the Private Placement shall terminate on the earlier to occur of (i) the consummation of the Merger, and (ii) March 31, 2018. The Company further agreed that, at no time from the date hereof until the consummation of the Merger, shall it provide or disclose to Alpha any “material non-public information” regarding itself, without the prior consent of Alpha. The funding of the Private Placement is subject to standard conditions such as accuracy of representations and warranties provided in the Merger Agreement, and other similar conditions.

Financing Transactions

On February 10, 2017, the Company, TCB and IberiaBank (collectively, “Sellers”), and PWCM Investment Company IC LLC, and certain financial institutions (collectively, “Buyers”) entered into a Loan Sale Agreement (“LSA”), pursuant to which Sellers sold to Buyers, and Buyers purchased from Sellers, all of Sellers’ right, title and interest in, to and under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents, in exchange for (i) a cash payment of $5,000,000 (the “Cash Purchase Price”), (ii) a Synthetic Equity Interest equal to 10% of the proceeds, after Buyer’s realization of a 150% return on the Cash Purchase Price within five (5) years of the closing date of the sale, with payment being distributed 65.78947368% to TCB and 34.21052632% to IberiaBank, and (iii) at any time prior to February 10, 2022, Buyer may acquire the interest in clause (ii) above. In connection with the LSA, the Company released Sellers and its successors as holders of the rights under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents, including Buyers, from any and all claims under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents. 


Also on February 10, 2017, the Company and its subsidiaries, and successor lender entered into a binding letter agreement dated February 10, 2017, which was subsequently amended on March 30, 2017 (as amended, the “letter agreement”) pursuant to which:

1.the successor lender agreed to forgive our existing secured loan in the approximate principal amount of $17,295,000, and in exchange entered into a secured promissory note (which we refer to as the “restated secured note”) in the original principal amount of $4,500,000.
2.we:
a.conveyed our oil and gas properties and associated performance and surety bonds in Colorado, Texas, and Nebraska;
b.conveyed all of our shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc. (together, the “conveyed oil and gas assets”); and
c.retained our assets in Kansas and continued as a going concern. The Kansas assets currently provide most of our current operating revenue.

The restated secured note:

a.is secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s oil and gas producing assets situated in the State of Kansas,
b.evidences accrued interest on the $4,500,000 principal balance at a rate of 16% per annum,
c.bears interest from and after May 1, 2017, at a rate of 16.0% per annum,
d.is pre-payable in full at a discount at any time during the term of the restated secured note upon EnerJex paying $3,300,000 to successor lender, and
e.matures and is due and payable in full on November 1, 2017 (subject to the extension right described below).

The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018. We have an option to extend the maturity date of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.

So long as we repay the $3,300,000 in indebtedness on or prior to the maturity date, as extended, all other amounts payable under the restated secured note are to be forgiven.

The closing occurred on May 10, 2017. As part of the closing procedures and net settlement, we issued a promissory note to Pass Creek Resources LLC in the amount of $105,806. The promissory bears interest at 16% per annum and matured on June 9, 2017. The amount due was not paid on June 9, 2017, but the holder has not provided the Company a notice of default.

In connection with the May 10, 2017 closing and in consideration of the satisfaction of $13,425,000 of the amount due under the Credit Agreement, as amended, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries transferred to PCR Holdings LLC, an affiliate of the successor lenders under the Credit Agreement, all of the Company’s oil and gas properties and assets located in Colorado, Texas, and Nebraska, as well as the Company’s shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc.

To evidence the Company’s remaining $4,500,000 of indebtedness to PWCM Investment Company IC LLC (“PWCM”), RES Investment Group, LLC (“RES”), Round Rock Development Partners, LP (“Round Rock”), and Cibolo Holdings, LLC (“Cibolo Holdings,” and together with PWCM, RES and Round Rock, “Successor Lenders”), the Company’s subsidiaries (except Kansas Holdings, LLC) entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Cortland Capital Market Services LLC, as Administrative Agent, and the other financial institutions and banks parties thereto (the “New Credit Agreement”), and a related Amended and Restated Note (the “New Note”), in the amount of $3.3 million as described above.

Our subsidiaries’ obligations under the credit agreement and note are non-recourse and are secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ oil properties and assets located in Kansas. The Company was removed as a borrower under the Credit Agreement, but entered into a Guaranty of Recourse Carveouts, pursuant to which the Company guarantees its subsidiaries’ payment of certain fees and expenses due under the Credit Agreement, and may be liable for certain conduct, such as fraud, bad faith, gross negligence, and waste of the Kansas oil properties or assets.


On December 22, 2017, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amendment) with Pass Creek Resources, LLC (“Pass Creek”) and Cortland Capital Market Services, LLC (“Administration Agent”). The Company, Pass Creek, and Administrative Agent are parties to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated May 10, 2017. The Maturity Date of the Loan has been extended to the earlier of (i) February 15, 2018 or April 30, 2018, if (a) the Company provide notice to the Administrative Agent of their intent to extend the maturity date and (b) no later than the first Business Day following delivery of such notice pay a $100,000 extension fee, or (ii) the merger of AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of October 19, 2017. At the closing of the First Amendment, the Company paid Pass Creek a $65,000 extension fee and $7,500 to the Administrative Agent for additional fees. The Company also paid the Administrative Agent an additional $45,000 upon the filing of a definitive proxy statement by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company also agreed to borrow Improvement Advances in an amount not to exceed $300,000. The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018 and has the option to extend the maturity date of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.

These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for the next twelve months following the issuance of these financial statements. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. Accordingly, theconsolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of assetsrecorded asset amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities or any other adjustment that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

 

Note 3 - Equity TransactionsOff-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

Stock transactionsOn December 31, 2021, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. Since our inception, except for standard operating leases, we have not engaged in any off-balance sheet arrangements, including the use of structured finance, special purpose entities or variable interest entities. We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.

Contractual Obligations

Material contractual obligations arising in the fiscal year endednormal course of business primarily consist of business acquisition related liabilities, principal and interest payments for loans made under the Paycheck Protection Program, defined benefit plan obligations, principal and interest payments for operating leases and other purchase obligations. See Notes 5, 8, 10, 11 and 13 to the consolidated financial statements for amounts outstanding as of December 31, 20172021 for these contractual obligations.

 

We accrued dividends of $3,518,430 forInflation

Our opinion is that inflation did not have a material effect on our Series A Preferred Stockoperations for the year ended December 31, 2017. At2021.

Climate Change

Our opinion is that neither climate change, nor governmental regulations related to climate change, have had, or are expected to have, any material effect on our operations.

New Accounting Pronouncements

There were certain updates recently issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application to specific industries and are not expected to a have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, we are not required to provide information required by this Item.


ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Our financial statements are contained in pages F-1 through F-33, which appear at the end of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure and Control Procedures

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2017, aggregate2021 and concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. The term disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated, dividends payablerecorded, processed, summarized and communicated to the Series A Preferred Stock holders totaled $6,919,579.Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure to be reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

 

OnManagement’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“US GAAP”).

Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance of such reliability and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projection of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


Management has conducted, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021. Management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting used the criteria set forth in SEC Release 33-8810 based on the framework established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control over Financial Reporting — Guidance for Smaller Public Companies. Based on this evaluation, Management concluded that our system of internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2021, based on these criteria.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. As a smaller reporting company, our management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only the management’s report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(t) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during the year ended December 31, 2021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

None. 

ITEM 9C.DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

None.

38

PART III

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the definitive proxy statement for our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2021.

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the definitive proxy statement for our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2021.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the definitive proxy statement for our 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2021.

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the definitive proxy statement for our 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2021.

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the definitive proxy statement for our 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2021.


PART IV

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES

Exhibit No.Description
3.1Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2008)
3.2Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation as filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on May 29, 2014 (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 3.1 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on May 29, 2014)
3.3Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 3.1 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on May 29, 2014)
3.4Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.1 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2015)
3.5Certificate of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on April 27, 2017 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2017)
3.6Amendment to Certificate of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Form 8-K filed on March 29, 2018)
3.7Certificate of Designation for Series A Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2011).
3.8Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of the 10% Series A Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed on March 29, 2018)
3.9Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of the 10% Series A Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 8-K filed on March 29, 2018)
3.10Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Energex Resources, Inc. to change the company’s name (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Form 8-K filed on March 29, 2018)
3.11Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of EnerJex Resources, Inc. to effect a 1-for-25 reverse stock split (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Form 8-K filed on March 29, 2018)
3.12Articles of Merger, dated March 26, 2018, by and between AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. and AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc.(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.6 on Form 8-K filed on March 29, 2018)
3.13Amended and Restated Bylaws, as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Appendix C to Schedule 14A filed on May 22, 2013)
3.14Certificate of Designation of Series D 8% Preferred Stock filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on December 26, 2018 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 28, 2018)

3.15Certificate of Designation for the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on April 2, 2020 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 8, 2020)
4.1*Description of Registrant’s Securities
4.2Pre-Funded Common Stock Purchase Warrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 on Form 8-K filed on January 5, 2021)
4.3Common Stock Purchase Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 on Form 8-K filed on June August 6, 2020)
10.12017 Equity Incentive Plan of the Registrant (Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-226324) originally filed on July 24, 2018)
10.2ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT, dated as of July 25, 2018, into by and among the (i) Registrant, (ii) EAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS, INC., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Registrant, (iii) AGRIBOTIX, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, (iv) the individuals listed on the signature page thereof, and (v) Paul Hoff, in his capacity as the representative of the Seller Investor. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed on July 31, 2018).


10.3Employment Agreement for Nicole Fernandez-McGovern dated January 1, 2019
10.4AgEagle Employee Confidentiality and Proprietary Rights Agreement between AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc and Nicole Fernandez-McGovern dated January 1, 2019
10.5Employment Agreement for Michael Drozd, dated April 28, 2020 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed on May 1, 2020)
10.6*AgEagle Employee Confidentiality and Proprietary Rights Agreement between AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. and J. Michael Drozd dated as of May 18, 2020
10.7Securities Purchase Agreement by and between AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. and Alpha Anstalt Capital, dated December 31, 2020 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 5, 2020)
10.8Lease Agreement, dated August 3, 2020, by and among AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. and U.S. Business Centers, L.L.C. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 7, 2020)
10.9Convertible Promissory Note, dated October 14, 2020 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2020)
10.10Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 26, 2021, by and among Parrot Drones S.A.S., Justin B. McAllister, AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. and AgEagle Sensor Systems, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2021)
10.11Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2021, by and among Parrot Drones S.A.S., Justin B. McAllister, AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. and AgEagle Sensor Systems, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2021)
10.12Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of April 19, 2021, by and among the Sellers named therein, Brandon Torres Declet, in his capacity as Seller's representative and AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 23, 2021)
10.13Employment Offer Letter between AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. and Brandon Torres Declet. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 23, 2021)
10.14Amended Employment Offer Letter between AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. and Michael Drozd. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 23, 2021)
10.15Separation and General Release dated June 11, 2021, by and between AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. and Michael Drozd. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 18, 2021)
10.16Amended Employment Offer Letter between AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. and Nicole Fernandez-McGovern. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 23, 2021)
10.17Sales Agreement among AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc., Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated and Raymond James & Associates, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 28, 2021)

10.18Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of October 18, 2021, by and among Parrot Drones S.A.S. and AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2021)
10.19Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of October 18, 2021, by and among Parrot Inc., AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. and AgEagle Aerial Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2021)
10.20Registration Rights Agreement dated as of October 19, 2021, by and between Parrot Drones S.A.S. and AgEagle Aerial Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2021)
14.1Code of Ethics of the Registrant Applicable To Directors, Officers And Employees (Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-226324) originally filed on July 24, 2018)
21.1*List of Subsidiaries
23.1*Consent of WithumSmith+Brown, PC., an independent registered public accounting firm
31.1*Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of principal executive officer
31.2*Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of principal financial officer
32.1*Section 1350 Certification of principal executive officer
32.2*Section 1350 Certification of principal financial officer and principal accounting officer
101.INSXBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT
101.SCH XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA
101.CAL XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE
101.DEF XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE
101.LABXBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE
101.PRE XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE

* Filed herewith


Item 16.Form 10-K Summary

None.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.
Dated: April 12, 2022By:/s/ Barrett Mooney
Barrett Mooney
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Dated: April 12, 2022By:/s/ Nicole Fernandez-McGovern
Nicole Fernandez-McGovern
Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President of Operations and Secretary

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignaturesTitleDate
/s/ Barrett MooneyChief Executive OfficerApril 12, 2022
Barret Mooney(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Nicole Fernandez-McGovernChief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President   of Operations and SecretaryApril 12, 2022
Nicole Fernandez-McGovern(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
/s/ Barrett MooneyChairman of the BoardApril 12, 2022
Barrett Mooney
/s/ Grant BegleyDirectorApril 12, 2022
Grant Begley
/s/ Luisa IngargiolaDirectorApril 12, 2022
Luisa Ingargiola
/s/ Thomas GardnerDirectorApril 12, 2022
Thomas Gardner


INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ContentsPage No.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Loss for the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020F-6
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsF-7


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries, (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2021, and the related consolidated notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company entered into an Additional Issuance Agreement with Alpha Capital Anstalt,as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the purchaseeach of 300 restricted sharesthe two years in the period ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its newly designated Series C Convertible Preferred Stockinternal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in considerationthe consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for $300,000,our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Business Combinations

As described in Note 1 and Note 5, the Company acquired three companies during the year ended December 31, 2021. A significant component of each acquisition included identifiable intangible assets. The preliminary valuation of identifiable intangible assets was conducted using the excess earnings method discount approach and other valuation methods.

We identified the business combinations as a critical audit matter since the assumptions as described above involve high levels of management judgment and in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, effort and subjectivity in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence related to management’s valuation methods and significant assumptions. In addition, the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

- Evaluating the appropriateness of management’s valuation methodologies.

- Assessing the reasonableness of various inputs of the excess earnings method discount approach and other valuation methods.

- Involving the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.

Goodwill and other indefinite-life intangibles – impairment assessment

As described in Note 2 and Note 7, the Company estimates the fair value of each reporting unit using a combination of a discounted cash flow analysis and market-based valuation methodology. The fair value of the SaaS reporting unit was less than the amount reflected in the consolidated balance sheet. Accordingly, the company recorded a $12.4 million impairment charge on its SaaS reporting unit.

We identified the impairment assessment as a critical audit matter since the assumptions as described above involve high levels of management judgment and in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, effort and subjectivity in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence related to management’s valuation methods and significant assumptions. In addition, the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

- Evaluating the appropriateness of management’s valuation methodologies.

- Assessing the reasonableness of various inputs of the discounted cash flow analysis.

- Involving the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.

WithumSmith+Brown, PC

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2020.

Orlando, Florida

April 12, 2022

PCAOB ID NUMBER 100

F-2

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

         
  As of December 31,
ASSETS 2021 2020
CURRENT ASSETS:        
Cash $14,590,566  $23,940,333 
Accounts receivable, net  2,888,879    
Inventories, net  4,038,508   135,647 
Prepaid and other current assets  1,292,570   122,011 
Notes receivable  185,000   600,000 
Total current assets  22,995,523   24,797,991 
         
Property and equipment, net  952,128   122,589 
Right of use asset  2,019,745   257,363 
Intangible assets, net  13,565,494   440,527 
Goodwill  64,867,282   3,108,000 
Other assets  282,869    
Total assets $104,683,041  $28,726,470 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Accounts payable $2,526,829  $159,812 
Accrued expenses  1,901,641   1,844,825 
Contract liabilities  971,140   2,302 
Current portion of liabilities related to acquisition agreements  10,061,501    
Current portion of lease liabilities  1,235,977   85,895 
Current portion of COVID loans  451,889   89,533 
Total current liabilities  17,148,977   2,182,367 
         
Long term portion of liabilities related to acquisition agreements  8,875,000    
Long term portion of lease liabilities  942,404   171,468 
Long term portion of COVID loans  808,021   17,906 
Defined benefit plan obligation  331,726    
Total liabilities  28,106,128   2,371,741 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (SEE NOTE 13)        
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:        
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively      
Common Stock, $0.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 75,314,988 and 58,636,365 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively  75,315   58,636 
Additional paid-in capital  127,626,536   47,241,757 
Accumulated deficit  (51,054,344)  (20,945,664)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (70,594)   
Total stockholders’ equity  76,576,913   26,354,729 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $104,683,041  $28,726,470 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

         
  For the Year Ended December 31,
  2021 2020
Revenues $9,760,952  $1,285,383 
Cost of sales  5,504,708   711,650 
Gross Profit  4,256,244   573,733 
         
Operating Expenses:        
General and administrative  12,260,610   2,732,274 
Professional fees  2,696,800   2,703,371 
Research and development  4,082,799   29,392 
Sales and marketing  3,150,886   40,003 
Goodwill impairment  12,357,921    
Total Operating Expenses  34,549,016   5,505,040 
Loss from Operations  (30,292,772)  (4,931,307)
         
Other Income (Expense):        
Paycheck Protection Program loan forgiveness  108,532    
Interest expense  (7,852)  (549)
Loss on disposal of fixed assets  (3,712)  (594)
Other income, net  87,124    
Total Other Income (Expense)  184,092   (1,143)
Loss Before Income Taxes  (30,108,680)  (4,932,450)
Provision for income taxes      
Net Loss $(30,108,680) $(4,932,450)
Deemed dividends on Series C Preferred Stock and Series D warrants     (4,050,838)
Deemed dividends on redemption of Series D Preferred Stock     (3,763,591)
Deemed dividends on issuance and repurchase of Series E Preferred Stock     (1,227,120)
Series D Preferred stock dividends     (69,778)
         
Net Loss Available to Common Stockholders  (30,108,680)  (14,043,777)
         
Comprehensive Loss:        
Defined benefit plan liability adjustment, net of tax  (67,903)   
Cumulative translation adjustment  (2,691)   
Total comprehensive loss, net of tax $(30,179,274) $(14,043,777)
         
Net Loss Per Common Share - Basic and Diluted $(0.43) $(0.35)
         
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding During the Period -- Basic and Diluted  70,055,832   40,688,019 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021 AND 2020

                                                 
  Par $ .0001 Preferred Stock Series C Shares Preferred Stock Series C Amount Par $ .0001 Preferred Stock Series D Shares Preferred Stock Series D Amount Par $ .0001 Preferred Stock Series E Shares Preferred Stock Series E Amount Par $ .0001 Common Shares Common Stock Amount Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Accumulated Deficit Total
Stockholders’ Equity
Balance as of December 31, 2019  3,501  $4   2,000  $2     $   15,424,394  $15,424  $12,456,989  $  $(8,198,785) $4,273,634 
Reversal of escrow shares related to Agribotix acquisition                    (164,375)  (164)  164          
Issuance of Common Stock for consulting services                    250,000   250   297,250         297,500 
Conversion of Series C Preferred Stock  (3,501)  (4)              13,597,984   13,598   (13,594)         
Conversion of Series D Preferred stock and accrued dividends        (2,000)  (2)        4,135,815   4,136   159,421         163,555 
Issuance of Series E Preferred Stock, net of issuance costs              1,050   1         1,009,999         1,010,000 
Repurchase of Series E Preferred Stock              (262)           (1,110,880)        (1,110,880)
Conversion of Series E Preferred Stock              (788)  (1)  3,152,000   3,152   (3,151)         
Sale of Common Stock, net of issuance costs                    10,163,105   10,163   22,786,579         22,796,742 
Sale of Common Stock from exercise of warrants                    11,025,544   11,025   3,309,091         3,320,116 
Exercise of options                    881,898   882   133,631         134,513 
Deemed dividend on Series C Preferred Stock and Series D warrants                          4,050,838      (4,050,838)   
Deemed dividend on redemption of Series D Preferred Stock                          3,763,591      (3,763,591)   
Stock-based compensation expense                    170,000   170   401,829         401,999 
Net loss                                 (4,932,450)  (4,932,450)
Balance as of December 31, 2020    $     $     $   58,636,365  $58,636  $47,241,757  $  $(20,945,664) $26,354,729 
Sale of Common Stock, net of issuance costs                    6,763,091   6,763   37,175,883         37,182,646 
Sales of Common stock from exercise of warrants                    2,516,778   2,517   8,302,851         8,305,368 
Issuance of Common Stock for acquisition of MicaSense                    540,541   541   2,999,459         3,000,000 
Issuance of Common Stock for acquisition of Measure                    5,319,145   5,319   24,369,681         24,375,000 
Issuance of Common stock in exchange for professional services                    550,000   550   2,906,450         2,907,000 
Common stock issued upon exercise of options                    505,167   505   122,465         122,970 
Stock-based compensation expense                    483,901   484   4,507,990         4,508,474 
Defined benefit plan obligation adjustment, net of tax                             (67,903)     (67,903)
Currency translation adjustment                             (2,691)     (2,691)
Net loss                                (30,108,680)  (30,108,680)
Balance as of December 31, 2021    $     $     $   75,314,988  $75,315  $127,626,536  $(70,594) $(51,054,344) $76,576,913 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

         
  For the Years Ended December 31,
  2021 2020
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:        
Net loss $(30,108,680) $(4,932,450)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Goodwill impairment  12,357,921    
Stock-based compensation  4,508,474   401,999 
Common stock issued in exchange for professional services  2,907,000   297,500 
Depreciation, amortization  1,501,826   173,661 
Provision for inventory obsolescence  305,399    
Defined benefit plan obligation and other  17,691    
Paycheck Protection Program loan forgiveness  (108,532)   
Loss on disposal of fixed assets  3,712   594 
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable, net  514,265   65,833 
Inventories, net  (1,981,952)  85,520 
Prepaid expenses and other assets  (218,493)  2,152 
Accounts payable  552,741   102,380 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities  (2,892,729)  1,808,411 
Contract liabilities  393,521   (262,171)
COVID loan  (179,910)   
Net cash used in operating activities  (12,463,128)  (2,256,571)
         
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Issuance of notes receivable     (600,000)
Payment on notes receivable  315,000     
Purchases of fixed assets  (525,312)  (106,124)
Acquisition of MicaSense, net of cash acquired  (14,568,897)   
Acquisition of Measure, net of cash acquired  (14,916,850)   
Acquisition of senseFly, net of cash acquired  (11,425,493)   
Platform development costs  (1,097,808)  (72,899
Internal use software costs  (278,264)   
Net cash used in investing activities  (42,497,624)  (779,023)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Proceeds from promissory note     107,439 
Issuance of Series E Preferred stock     1,010,000 
Repurchase of Series E Preferred stock     (1,110,880)
Sales of Common Stock, net of issuance costs  37,182,646   22,796,742 
Sale of Common Stock from exercise of warrants  8,305,368   3,320,116 
Exercise of stock options  122,970   134,513 
Net cash provided by financing activities  45,610,984   26,257,930 
         
Net (decrease) increase in cash  (9,349,767)  23,222,336 
Cash at beginning of year  23,940,333   717,997 
Cash at end of year $14,590,566  $23,940,333 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:        
Interest cash paid $  $ 
Income taxes paid $  $ 
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Conversion of Series C, D and E Preferred Stock into Common Stock $  $6,551 
Issuance of Series E Preferred Stock $  $1,050 
Deemed dividends $  $9,111,327 
Stock consideration for the MicaSense Acquisition $3,000,000  $ 
Stock consideration for the Measure Acquisition $24,375,000  $ 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021 AND 2020

Note 1 – Description of Business

AgEagle™ Aerial Systems Inc. (“AgEagle” or the “Company”), through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, is actively engaged in designing and delivering best-in-class drones, sensors and software that solve important problems for our customers. Founded in 2010, AgEagle was originally formed to pioneer proprietary, professional-grade, fixed-winged drones and aerial imagery-based data collection and analytics solutions for the agriculture industry. Today, the Company is earning distinction as a globally respected industry leader offering best-in-class, autonomous unmanned aerial systems (“UAS”) to a wide range of industry verticals, including energy/utilities, infrastructure, agriculture and government, among others.

The Company’s shift and expansion from solely manufacturing fixed-wing farm drones in 2018, to offering what the Company believes is one of the industry’s best fixed-wing, full-stack drone solutions, culminated in 2021 when AgEagle acquired three market-leading companies engaged in producing UAS airframes, sensors and software for commercial and government use. In addition to a robust portfolio of proprietary, connected hardware and software products; an optionestablished global network of nearly 200 UAS resellers; and enterprise customers worldwide; these acquisitions also brought AgEagle a highly valuable workforce comprised largely of experienced engineers and technologists with deep expertise in the fields of robotics, automation, manufacturing and data science.

AgEagle is led by a proven management team with years of drone industry experience. In view of AgEagle’s CEO’s appointment to purchasethe U.S. Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Advanced Aviation Advisory Committee and Unmanned Aircraft Systems Beyond Visual Line of Sight Aviation Rulemaking Committee, in addition to and the Company’s participation in the FAA’s BEYOND program, AgEagle has played a hands-on role in helping to establish necessary rulemaking guidelines and regulations for the future of autonomous flight and the full integration of drones into the U.S. airspace.

In January 2021, AgEagle acquired MicaSense™, Inc. (“MicaSense”). Founded in 2014, MicaSense has been at the forefront of advanced drone sensor development since its founding in 2014, having formed integration partnerships with several leading fixed wing and multi-rotor drone manufacturers. MicaSense’s patented, high precision thermal and multispectral sensors serve the aerial mapping and analytics needs of the agriculture market. MicaSense’s high performance proprietary products, including Altum™, RedEdge-MX™, RedEdge-MXBlue and Atlas Flight, have global distribution in over 70 countries.

In April 2021, AgEagle acquired Measure Global, Inc. (“Measure”). Founded in 2020, Measure serves a world class customer base, Measure enables its customers to realize the transformative benefits of drone technology through its Ground Control solution. Offered as Software-as-a-Service (SaaS), Ground Control is a cloud-based, plug-and-play operating system that empowers pilots and large enterprises with everything they need to operate drone fleets, fly autonomously, collaborate globally, visualize data, and integrate with existing business systems and processes.

In October 2021, AgEagle acquired senseFly S.A. a wholly-owned subsidiary of senseFly Inc. Concurrent with the acquisition, AgEagle Aerial, Inc. (“AgEagle Aerial), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the AgEagle, acquired senseFly Inc. Collectively senseFly S.A. and senseFly Inc. are referred to as “senseFly”. Founded in 2009, senseFly provides fixed-wing drone solutions for commercial and government markets that simplify the collection and analysis of geospatial data, allowing professionals to make better decisions, faster. senseFly develops and produces a proprietary line of eBee-branded, high performance, fixed-wing drones which have flown more than one million flights around the world.

Collectively, MicaSense, Measure and senseFly are referred to as the “2021 Acquired Companies”.

The Company is headquartered in Wichita, Kansas, where it also houses its U.S. manufacturing operations. In addition, the 2021 Acquired Companies have business operations in Austin, Texas; Lausanne, Switzerland; Raleigh, North Carolina; Seattle, Washington and Washington, D.C.

The Company intends to grow its business and preserve its leadership position by developing new drones, sensors and software and capturing a significant share of the global drone market. In addition, the Company expects to accelerate our growth and expansion through strategic acquisitions of companies offering distinct technological and competitive advantages and have defensible IP protection in place, if applicable.


Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist in understanding the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Such consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are the representations of the Company’s management, who are responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) in all material respects and have been consistently applied in preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation - These financial consolidated statements are presented in United States dollars and have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AgEagle and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, AgEagle Aerial, Inc., EnerJex Kansas, Inc., MicaSense, Measure and senseFly. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates- The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include the allowance for doubtful accounts, reserve for obsolete inventory, valuation of stock issued for services and stock options, valuation of intangible assets, including goodwill, valuation of defined benefit plan obligations and the valuation of deferred tax assets.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss - Other comprehensive loss refers to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that under US GAAP are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss a component of equity within the consolidated balance sheets, rather than net income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Under existing accounting standards, other comprehensive income or loss may include, among other things, unrecognized gains and losses on foreign currency translation and prior service credit related to benefit plans.

Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures– Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement (“ASC 820”), requires companies to determine fair value based on the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability to a market participant. ASC 820 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an additional 200 sharesentity-specific measurement.

The guidance requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase pricethe following categories:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

For short-term classes of $200,000.our financial instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes receivable and accounts payable, and which are not reported at fair value, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. The outstanding loan owed under the Paycheck Protection Program Loan (“PPP Loan”) is carried at face value, which approximates fair value. As of December 31, 2017,2021 and 2020, the Company haddid not have any financial assets or liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets on a recurring basis. (See Note 8)

Cash Concentrations -The Company maintains its cash balances at financial institutions that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $250,000. The Company’s bank balances at times may exceed the FDIC limit. To date, the Company has not experienced any losses on its invested cash.

Trade Receivables and Credit Policy– Trade receivables due from customers are uncollateralized customer obligations due under normal and customary trade terms. Trade receivables are stated at the amount billed to the customer. The Company generally does not charge interest on overdue customer account balances. Payments of trade receivables are allocated to the specific invoices identified on the customer’s remittance advice or, if unspecified, are applied to the earliest unpaid invoices.


The Company estimates an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon an evaluation of the current status of trade receivables, historical experience, and other factors as necessary. It is reasonably possible that the Company’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts will change.

Inventories Inventories, which consist of raw materials, finished goods and work-in-process, are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost being determined by the average-cost method, which approximates the first-in, first-out method. Cost components include direct materials and direct labor. At each balance sheet date, the Company evaluates its inventories for excess quantities and obsolescence. This evaluation primarily includes an analysis of forecasted demand in relation to the inventory on hand, among consideration of other factors. The physical condition (e.g., age and quality) of the inventories is also considered in establishing its valuation. Based upon the evaluation, provisions are made to reduce excess or obsolete inventories to their estimated net realizable values. Once established, write-downs are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the respective inventories. These adjustments are estimates, which could vary significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from the amounts that the Company may ultimately realize upon the disposition of inventories if future economic conditions, customer inventory levels, product discontinuances, sales return levels or competitive conditions differ from the Company’s estimates and expectations.

Business Combinations - The Company records acquisitions pursuant to ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, (“ASC 805”). The Company recognizes, with certain exceptions, 100% of the fair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests when the acquisition constitutes a change in control of the acquired entity. Shares issued 300 sharesin consideration for a business combination are measured and recorded at their acquisition-date fair value. Subsequent changes to fair value of Series C Convertible Preferred Stockcontingent consideration arrangements are generally reflected in earnings. Acquisition-related transaction costs are expensed as incurred. The operating results of entities acquired are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss from the respective dates of acquisition.

Intangible Assets - Intangible assets from acquired businesses are recognized at fair value on the acquisition date and consist of customer programs, trademarks, customer relationships, technology, and other intangible assets. Customer programs include values assigned to major programs of acquired businesses and represent the aggregate value associated with the customer relationships, contracts, technology, and trademarks underlying the associated program and are amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of expected cash flows used to measure fair value, which ranges from three to five years.

In accordance with ASC Topic 350-40, Software - Internal-Use Software (“ASC 350-40”), the Company capitalizes certain direct costs of developing internal-use software that are incurred in the application development stage, when developing or obtaining software for internal use. Once the internal use software is ready for its intended use, it is amortized on a straight-line basis over its useful life.

Finite-lived intangible assets are evaluated for impairment periodically, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their related carrying amounts may not be recoverable in accordance with ASC Topic 360-10-15, Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, (“ASC 360-10-15”). In evaluating intangible assets for recoverability, the Company uses its best estimate of future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and eventual disposition in accordance with ASC 360-10-15. To the extent that estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are less than the carrying amount, an aggregate purchase priceimpairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the difference between the carrying value of $300,000.such asset and its fair value.

Asset recoverability is an area involving management judgment, requiring assessment as to whether the carrying values of assets are supported by their undiscounted future cash flows. In addition, duringestimating future cash flows, certain assumptions are required to be made in respect of highly uncertain matters such as revenue growth rates, operating expenses and terminal growth rates.

For the year endingended December 31, 2017,2021, the Company had received $200,000 from Alpha Capital Anstalt to purchase an additional 200 sharesdetermined the value of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock.intangible assets was recoverable. As of December 31, 2017,2021 and 2020, the additional 200 sharesCompany reviewed the indicators for impairment and concluded that 0 impairment of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock haveits finite-lived intangible assets existed.

Goodwill The assets and liabilities of acquired businesses are recorded in accordance with ASC 805. Goodwill represents costs in excess of fair values assigned to the underlying identifiable net assets of acquired businesses. Goodwill is not been issuedsubject to amortization and are reflectedis tested annually for impairment, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the goodwill may not be recoverable.


During the fourth quarter of 2021 and 2020, respectively, and in accordance with ASC Topic 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and other (“ASC 350”), the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test using a quantitative approach by comparing the carrying value of the reporting unit, including goodwill, to its fair value. If the carrying value of the reporting unit, including goodwill, exceeds its fair value, a goodwill impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The Company estimates the fair value of each reporting unit using a combination of a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) (Level 3 input) analysis and market-based valuation methodology such as Series C Convertible Preferred Stock Issuable oncomparable public company trading values. Determining fair value requires the balance sheetexercise of significant judgments, including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, long-term growth rates, discount rates and relevant comparable public company earnings multiples and relevant trading multiples. The cash flows employed in the aggregate amountDCF analysis are based on estimates of $200,000.

future sales, earnings and cash flows after considering factors such as general market conditions, existing firm orders, expected future orders, changes in working capital, long term business plans and recent operating performance. The DCF analysis for the Sensor reporting unit used a discount rate of 17.5%, while the DCF analysis for the SaaS reporting unit used a discount rate of 25.5%. The discount rates reflect the different market conditions and risk factors prevalent within each respective industry. As a result of the Company’s recent acquisition of senseFly, which comprises the Drone and Custom Manufacturing reporting unit, the Company recordedperformed a beneficial conversion featurequalitative assessment to determine whether a quantitative goodwill test was necessary. In performing its qualitative assessment, the Company reviewed events and circumstances that could affect the significant inputs used to determine if the fair value is less than the carrying value of $208,500 based ongoodwill and concluded that the fair value of the common stockDrones and the conversion rate asCustom Manufacturing reporting unit exceeded its carrying value.

Revenue Recognition and Concentration The majority of the dateCompany’s revenues are derived primarily through the sales of issuance. This amountdrone and drone related products and services, sensors and related accessories, and software subscriptions. All contracts and agreements are a fixed price and are accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”).

The Company generally recognizes revenue on sales to customers, dealers, and distributors upon satisfaction of performance obligations which generally occurs once controls transfer to customers, which is when product is shipped or delivered depending on specific shipping terms and, where applicable, a customer acceptance has been obtained. The fee is not considered to be fixed or determinable until all material contingencies related to the sales have been resolved. The Company records revenue in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss, net of any sales, use, value added, or certain excise taxes imposed by governmental authorities on specific sales transactions and net of any discounts, allowances and returns.

Under fixed-price contracts, the Company agrees to perform the specified work for a pre-determined price. To the extent the Company’s actual costs vary from the estimates upon which the price was negotiated, it will generate more or less profit or could incur a loss. The Company accounts for a contract after it has been approved by all parties to the arrangement, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is probable.

Additionally, customer payments received in advance of the Company completing performance obligations are recorded as contract liabilities. Customer deposits represent customer prepayments and are recognized as revenue when the term of the sale or performance obligation are completed.

The Company’s software subscriptions to its platforms, FarmLens, Atlas and Ground Control, are offered on a deemed distributionsubscription basis. These subscription fees are recognized ratably over each monthly membership period as the services are provided.

Revenue concentration information for customers comprising more than 10% of the Company’s total net revenues is summarized below:

Sales concentration information    
  Percent of Net Sales for Year Ended December 31,
Customers 2021 2020
Customer A  %  93.7%

As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, there were 0 accounts receivable amounts due from Customer A, and no one customer comprised more than 10% of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017.2021.

Provision for Warranty Expense - The Company provides warranties against defects in materials and workmanship of its drone systems for specified periods of time. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, drones and related accessories sold are covered by the warranty for a period of up to one year from the date of sale by the Company. Estimated warranty expenses are recorded as an accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets with a corresponding provision to cost of sales in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. This estimate is recognized concurrent with the recognition of revenue on the sale to a customer. The Company reserve for warranty expense is based on its historical experience and management’s expectation of future conditions, taking into consideration the location and type of customer and the type of drone, which directly correlate to the materials and components under warranty, the duration of the warranty period, and the logistical costs to service the warranty. An increase in warranty claims or in the costs associated with servicing those claims would likely result in an increase in the reserve and a decrease in gross profit.


Shipping Costs– All shipping costs billed directly to the customer are directly offset to shipping costs resulting in a net expense to the Company, which is included in cost of goods sold in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, shipping costs were $296,100 and $6,122, respectively.

Advertising Costs – Advertising costs are charged to operations as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, advertising costs, included in sales and marketing expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, were $262,586 and $45,567.

Research and Development – For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, research and development expenses were $4,082,799 and $29,392, respectively. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Vendor Concentrations - As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, there was one significant vendor that the Company relies upon to perform certain services for the Company’s technology platform. This vendor provides services to the Company, which can be replaced by alternative vendors should the need arise.

Defined Benefit Plan - The Company estimates liabilities and expenses for its defined benefit plan. Estimated amounts are based on historical information, current information, and estimates regarding future events and circumstances. Significant assumptions used in the valuation of these benefit plan liabilities include the expected return on plan assets, discount rate, and rate of increase in compensation levels.

Loss Per Common Share Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus Common Stock, par value $0.0001 (“Common Stock”) equivalents (if dilutive) related to warrants, options, and convertible instruments.

Potentially Dilutive Securities The Company has excluded all common equivalent shares outstanding for warrants and options to purchase Common Stock from the calculation of diluted net loss per share, because all such securities are anti-dilutive for the periods presented. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had 821,405 unvested restricted stock units and 2,541,667 options outstanding to purchase shares of Common Stock. There were no warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had 2,516,778 warrants and 2,255,267 options to purchase shares of Common Stock. 

Leases– The Company accounts for its operating leases in accordance with ASC Topic 842, Leases (“ASC 842”), which requires that lessees recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for virtually all their leases with lease terms of more than twelve months. Consistent with current GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease.

Income Taxes– The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Accounting for Income Taxes, (“ASC 740”) which requires an asset and liability approach for accounting for income taxes. The Company evaluates its tax positions that have been taken or are expected to be taken on income tax returns to determine if an accrual is necessary for uncertain tax positions. The Company will recognize future accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense if incurred. All income tax returns not filed more than three years ago are subject to federal and state tax examinations by tax authorities.

Stock-Based Compensation Awards The Company accounts for its stock-based awards in accordance with ASC Subtopic 718-10, Compensation – Stock Compensation (“ASC 718-10”)which requires fair value measurement on the grant date and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors. For stock options, the Company estimates the fair value using a closed option valuation (Black-Scholes) model. The estimated fair value is then expensed over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the vesting period. Stock-based compensation expenses are presented in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss within general and administrative expenses. The Company recognizes forfeitures at the time they occur.

 

The Series CBlack-Scholes option-pricing model requires the input of certain assumptions that require the Company’s judgment, including the expected term and the expected stock price volatility of the underlying stock. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock-based compensation represent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of judgment. As a result, if factors change resulting in the use of different assumptions, stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.


Segment Reporting In accordance with ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, (“ASC 280”), the Company identifies operating segments as components of an entity for which discrete financial information is available and is regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in making decisions regarding resource allocation and performance assessment. The Company defines the term “chief operating decision maker” to be its chief executive officer.

The Company has determined that operates and reports in three segments:

Drones and Custom Manufacturing, which comprises revenues earned from contractual arrangements to develop, manufacture and /or modify complex drone related products, and to provide associated engineering, technical and other services according to customer specifications

Sensors, which comprises the revenue earned through the sale of sensors, cameras, and related accessories

SaaS, which comprises revenue earned through the offering of online-based subscriptions.

Contingencies - In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to loss contingencies that cover a range of matters. An estimated loss from a loss contingency, such as a legal proceeding or claim, is accrued if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. In determining whether a loss should be accrued, the Company evaluates, among other factors, the degree of probability and the ability to reasonably estimate the amount of any such loss.

Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Adopted

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASU 2019-12”), which simplifies the accounting for income taxes by eliminating certain exceptions to the guidance in ASC 740 related to the approach for intra-period tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition for deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. ASU 2019-12 also simplifies aspects of the accounting for franchise taxes and enacted changes in tax laws or rates and clarifies the accounting for transactions that result in a step-up in the tax basis of goodwill. ASU 2019-12 became effective for the Company on March 1, 2021 and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General, which modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. ASU 2018-14 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020. As a result of its business acquisition of senseFly, which provides a defined benefit plan for employees in its Lausanne, Switzerland office, the Company adopted ASU 2018-14. The adoption of ASU 2018-14 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Pending

In October 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-08, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers, which requires entities to apply Topic 606 to recognize and measure contract assets and contract liabilities in a business combination. ASU 2021-08 is effective for the fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2022. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848) - Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting (“ASU 2020-04”), which provides optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for the discontinuation of a reference rate such as LIBOR, formerly known as the London Interbank Offered Rate, because of reference rate reform. ASU 2020-04 is effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. The Company will apply ASU 2020-04 prospectively, as and when, it enters into transactions to which this guidance applies. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.


In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2017-04 Intangibles - Goodwill and other, which simplifies the test for goodwill impairment. ASU 2017-04 eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. In computing the implied fair value of goodwill under Step 2, an entity had to perform procedures to determine the fair value at the impairment testing date of its assets and liabilities (including unrecognized assets and liabilities) following the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Instead, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, however the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. ASU 2017-04 requires prospective adoption and is effective for the fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2022. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) (“ASU 2016-13”), which provides guidance on how an entity should measure credit losses on financial instruments. The ASU is effective for smaller reporting companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect that ASU 2016-13 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by FASB did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic

In December 2019, a novel coronavirus disease (“COVID-19”) was reported. On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (“WHO”) declared COVID-19 a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. On February 28, 2020, the WHO raised its assessment of the COVID-19 threat from high to very high at a global level due to the continued increase in the number of cases and affected countries, and on March 11, 2020, the WHO characterized COVID-19 as a pandemic.

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has evolved into a global pandemic. The coronavirus has spread to many regions of the world, including the United States. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our business and operating results will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be accurately predicted, including new information that may emerge concerning COVID-19 and the actions to contain the coronavirus or treat its impact, among others.

The spread of the coronavirus, which has caused a broad impact globally, including restrictions on travel and quarantine policies put into place by businesses and governments, may have a material economic effect on our business. While the potential economic impact brought on by and the duration of the pandemic may be difficult to assess or predict, it has already caused, and is likely to result in further, significant disruptions of global financial markets, which may reduce our ability to access capital either at all or on favorable terms. In addition, a recession, depression or other sustained adverse market event resulting from the spread of the coronavirus could materially and adversely affect our business and the value of our Common Stock.

In addition, as a result of the pandemic, our ability to access components and parts needed in order to manufacture the Company’s proprietary drones and sensors, and to perform quality testing have been impacted. If either we or any third-parties in the supply chain for materials used in our manufacturing and assembly processes continue to be adversely impacted by restrictions resulting from the coronavirus pandemic, our supply chain may be further disrupted, limiting our ability to manufacture and assemble products.

The ultimate impact of the current pandemic, or any other health epidemic, is highly uncertain and subject to change. We do not yet know the full extent of potential delays or impacts on our business or the global economy as a whole. However, these effects could have a material impact on our operations. We will continue to monitor the situation closely.

F-13

Note3 - Balance Sheet Accounts

Inventories, Net

As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, inventories, net consist of the following: 

Schedule Of Inventories        
  December 31,
  2021 2020
Raw materials $2,862,293  $88,091 
Work-in process  40,113   50,447 
Finished goods  833,785    
Consignment inventory  607,716   7,109 
Gross inventories  4,343,907   145,647 
Less: Provision for obsolescence  (305,399)  (10,000)
Inventories, net $4,038,508  $135,647 

Property and Equipment, Net

As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, property and equipment, net consist of the following:

Schedule Of Property and Equipment            
  Estimated  
  Useful  
  Life December 31,
Type (Years) 2021 2020
Leasehold improvements  3  $81,993  $22,265 
Equipment and vehicles  5   132,831   100,532 
Computer and office equipment  3-5   559,110   23,369 
Furniture  5   77,971   54,798 
Drone equipment  3   95,393   32,138 
Production fixtures  5   163,580    
Tooling  4   121,368    
       1,232,246   232,102 
Less accumulated depreciation      (280,118)  (110,513)
Total Property and equipment, net     $952,128  $122,589 

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was $184,660 and $20,716, respectively. Depreciation expense included in cost of sales on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 are $55,613 and $0, respectively. The remaining depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 is included in general and administrative on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company recorded $15,055 and $13,185, respectively, on disposals of property and equipment, respectively, resulting in losses of $3,712 and $594, respectively, which are included in other income (expense) on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Accrued Expenses

As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, accrued expenses consist of the following as of:

Schedule Of Accounts Payable And Accrued Liabilities        
  December 31,
  2021 2020
Accrued compensation and related liabilities $1,039,979  $80,091 
Provision for warranty expense  286,115   15,593 
Accrued professional fees  267,949   85,633 
Accrued settlement liability     1,500,000 
Other  307,598   163,508 
Total accrued expenses $1,901,641  $1,844,825 


Note 4 – Notes Receivable

Valqari

On October 14, 2020, in connection with, and as an incentive to the entry into a two-year exclusive manufacturing agreement (the “Manufacturing Agreement”) to produce a patented Drone Delivery Station for Valqari, LLC (“Valqari), the Company entered into, as payee, a Convertible PreferredPromissory Note pursuant to which the Company made a loan to Valqari (“Valqari”) in the principal aggregate amount of $500,000 (the “Note”). The Note accrues interest at a rate of three percent per annum.

The Note matured on April 15, 2021 (the “Maturity Date”), at which time all outstanding principal and interest that had accrued, but remained, unpaid was due. The Note provides for an automatic six month extension of the Maturity Date under the following circumstances (i) Valqari has received in writing, (x) a good faith acquisition offer at a consideration value greater than $15,000,000, (y) such offer, upon consummation, would result in a change in control (as defined in the note) of Valqari, and (z) at such time Valqari, is actively engaged in the negotiation or finalization of such acquisition transaction; or (ii) Valqari has initiated, or is in the process of initiating, a conversion to a “C-Corporation” under the Internal Revenue Code, whereas such conversion will be completed no later than one day prior to the extended Maturity Date. Valqari was not permitted to prepay the Note prior to the Maturity Date. On April 15, 2021, the Note was extended for an additional six months, until October 14, 2021 (“Extended Maturity Date”).

The Note is subject to customary representations and warranties by Valqari, as well as events of default, which may lead to acceleration of the payment of the Note such as (i) failure to pay all of the outstanding principal, plus accrued interest on the Maturity Date or Extended Maturity Date, (ii) Valqari filing a petition or action under any bankruptcy, or other law, or (iii) an involuntary petition is filed again Valqari under any bankruptcy statute (that is not dismissed or discharged within 60 days). The indebtedness evidenced by the Note is subordinated in right of payment to the prior payment in full of any senior indebtedness (as defined in the Note) in existence on the date of the Note or incurred thereafter.

On the Extended Maturity Date, AgEagle demanded payment of the Note, including accrued interest; however, Valqari sought a substantial discount on the amount due under the Note to compensate for alleged breaches by AgEagle under the Manufacturing Agreement. AgEagle disputes the allegations of breach and believes that it is owed a net amount by Valqari under the Manufacturing Agreement, in addition to the amount due under the Note. On November 24, 2021, Valqari made a payment of principal on the Note of $315,000. The parties are continuing to negotiate in an attempt to reach an amicable resolution of their disputes; however, AgEagle reserves the right to take legal action to collect the Note in the event that a settlement is not reached.

MicaSense

On November 16, 2020, AgEagle, as payee, executed a promissory note with Parrot Drones S.A.S. in connection with its acquisition for 100% of the capital stock of MicaSense (the “MicaSense Acquisition”). As of June 30, 2021, Parrot Drones S.A.S. promised to pay to the Company the principal amount of $100,000 provided, however, that such principal amount was offset and reduced by all amounts paid or due in connection with the purchase price upon closing of the MicaSense Acquisition. (See Note 5)

senseFly

On August 25, 2021, AgEagle Aerial, as payee, executed a promissory note in connection with its acquisition for 100% of the capital stock of senseFly (the “senseFly Acquisition”). As of September 30, 2021, Parrot Drones S.A.S. promised to pay to the Company the principal amount of $200,000 provided, however, that such principal amount was off-set and reduced by all amounts paid or due in connection with the purchase price upon closing of the senseFly Acquisition. (See Note 5)

Note 5 – Business Acquisitions

In line with the Company’s strategic growth initiatives, the Company acquired three companies during the year ended December 31, 2021. The financial results of each of these acquisitions are included in the consolidated financial statements beginning on the respective acquisition dates. Each transaction qualified as an acquisition of a business and was accounted for as a business combination. All acquisitions resulted in the recognition of goodwill. The Company paid these premiums resulting in such goodwill for several reasons, including growing the Company’s customer base, acquiring assembled workforces, expanding its presence in certain markets, and expanding and advancing its product and service offerings. The Company recorded the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at their acquisition date fair value, with the difference between the fair value of the net assets acquired and the acquisition consideration reflected as goodwill.


The identifiable intangible assets for acquisitions are valued using the excess earnings method discounted cash flow approach for customer relationships, the relief from royalty method for trade names and technology, the “with or without” method for covenants not to compete and the replacement cost method for the internal property software by incorporating Level 3 inputs, as described under the fair value hierarchy of ASC 820. These unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s assumption about which assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset on a non-recurring basis. These assets will be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives.

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, transaction costs related to business combinations totaled $636,673 and $18,327, respectively. These costs are included within general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

MicaSense

On January 27, 2021 (the “MicaSense Acquisition Date”), the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement (the “MicaSense Purchase Agreement”) with Parrot Drones S.A.S. and Justin B. McAllister (the “MicaSense Sellers”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of MicaSense from the MicaSense Sellers (the “MicaSense Acquisition”). The aggregate purchase price for the shares of MicaSense was $23,000,000, less any debt, and subject to a customary working capital adjustment. A portion of the consideration comprises shares of Common stock of the Company, having an aggregate value of $3,000,000 based on a volume weighted average trading price of the Common stock over a ten consecutive trading day period prior to the date of issuance of the shares of Common stock to the MicaSense Sellers. On April 27, 2021 the Company issued 540,541 restricted shares of its Common Stock. The consideration is also subject to a $4,821,512 holdback to cover any post-closing indemnification claims, a key employee payment, and to satisfy any purchase price adjustments. The holdback is scheduled to be released in two equal installments, less any amounts paid or reserved for outstanding indemnity claims, on March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2023 in accordance with the terms of the MicaSense Purchase Agreement. (See Note 17)

On May 10, 2021, the Company filed a Form S-3 Registration Statement (the “MicaSense Registration Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), covering the resale of the Shares. The MicaSense Registration Statement was declared effective on June 1, 2021 (File Number: 333-255940). In addition, the Company shall use its best efforts to keep the MicaSense Registration Statement effective and in compliance with the provisions of the Securities Act (including by preparing and filing with the SEC such amendments, including post-effective amendments, and supplements to the MicaSense Registration Statement and the prospectus used in connection therewith as may be necessary) until all Shares and other securities covered by the MicaSense Registration Statement have been disposed. The MicaSense Sellers reimbursed the Company for reasonable legal fees and expenses incurred by the Company in connection with such registration.

The MicaSense Purchase Agreement contains certain customary representations, warranties, and covenants, including representations and warranties by the MicaSense Sellers with respect to MicaSense’s business, operations and financial condition. The MicaSense Purchase Agreement also includes post-closing covenants relating to the confidentiality and employee non-solicitation obligations of the MicaSense Sellers, and the agreement of the MicaSense Sellers not to compete with certain aspects of the business of MicaSense following the closing of the transaction. The completion of the transactions contemplated by the MicaSense Purchase Agreement is subject to customary closing conditions, including, among others: (i) the absence of a material adverse effect on MicaSense, (ii) the delivery by the parties of certain ancillary documents, including the Registration Rights Agreement, and (iii) the execution by a key employee of MicaSense of an employment agreement. Subject to certain limitations, each of the parties will be indemnified for damages resulting from third party claims and breaches of the parties’ respective representations, warranties, and covenants in the MicaSense Purchase Agreement.

The Company performed a valuation analysis of the fair market value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Using the total consideration for the MicaSense Acquisition, the Company determined the allocations to such assets and liabilities. The final purchase price allocation, and the necessary detailed valuations and calculations have been finalized.

The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price as of the MicaSense Acquisition Date:

Schedule of allocation preliminary purchase price  
Calculation of Goodwill:  
Net purchase price, including debt paid at close $23,375,681 
     
Plus: fair value of liabilities assumed:    
Current liabilities  702,925 
Fair value of liabilities assumed $702,925 
     
Less: fair value of assets acquired:    
Cash $885,273 
Other tangible assets  2,050,939 
Identifiable intangible assets  3,061,803 
Fair value of assets acquired $5,112,742 
     
Net nonoperating assets  25,000 
Adjustments for seller transaction expenses related to purchase price allocation  32,032 
Goodwill $18,972,896 

The Company recorded revenue from MicaSense of $6,793,727 and an operating loss of $1,266,599 during the period from the MicaSense Acquisition Date through December 31, 2021.


Measure

On April 19, 2021 (the “Measure Acquisition Date”), the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement (the “Measure Purchase Agreement”) with Brandon Torres Declet (“Mr. Torres Declet”), in his capacity as Measure Sellers’ representative, and the sellers named in the Measure Purchase Agreement (the “Measure Sellers”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Measure from the Measure Sellers (the “Measure Acquisition”). The aggregate purchase price for the shares of Measure is $45,000,000, less the amount of Measure’s debt and transaction expenses, and subject to a customary working capital adjustment. The purchase price comprised $15,000,000 in cash, and shares of Common stock of the Company, having an aggregate value of $30,000,000 based on a volume weighted average trading price of the Common stock over a seven consecutive trading day period prior to the date of issuance of the shares of Common stock to the Measure Sellers. The Company issued 5,319,145 shares of Common Stock, in the aggregate, to the Measure Sellers, and paid $5,000,000 of the cash portion of the purchase price ninety days after the closing date of the transaction. As of December 31, 2021, the Company completed the payment of the cash portion of the purchase price. The consideration is also subject to a $5,625,000 holdback to cover any post-closing indemnification claims and to satisfy any purchase price adjustments. The holdback is scheduled to be released on the date that is eighteen months from the closing date, less any amounts paid or reserved for outstanding indemnity claims and certain amounts subject to employee retention conditions set forth in the Measure Purchase Agreement.

The Measure Purchase Agreement contains certain customary representations, warranties, and covenants, including representations and warranties by the Measure Sellers with respect to Measure’s business, operations and financial condition. The Measure Purchase Agreement also includes post-closing covenants relating to the confidentiality and employee non-solicitation obligations of the Measure Sellers, and the agreement of the Measure Sellers not to compete with certain aspects of the business of Measure following the closing of the transaction. The completion of the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement is subject to: (i) the absence of a material adverse effect on Measure, (ii) the delivery by the parties of certain ancillary documents, and (iii) the execution by key employees of Measure of employment offer letters. Subject to certain limitations, each of the parties will be indemnified for damages resulting from third party claims and breaches of the parties’ respective representations, warranties, and covenants in the Purchase Agreement.

The Shares issuable to the Measure Sellers pursuant to the Measure Purchase Agreement were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), to a limited number of persons who are “accredited investors” or “sophisticated persons” as those terms are defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated by the SEC, without the use of any general solicitation or advertising to market or otherwise offer the securities for sale. None of the Shares have been registered under the Securities Act, or applicable state securities laws, and none may be offered or sold in the United States absent registration under the Securities Act or an exemption from such registration requirements.

The Company performed a preliminary valuation analysis of the fair market value of the assets to be acquired and liabilities to be assumed. Using the total consideration for the Acquisition, the Company estimated the allocations to such assets and liabilities. The final purchase price allocation will be determined when the Company completes the detailed valuations and necessary calculations. The final allocation could differ materially from the preliminary allocation and may include (1) changes in fair values of tangible assets; (2) changes in allocations to intangible assets such as trade names, developed technology and customer relationships, as well as goodwill; and (3) other changes to assets and liabilities.


The following table summarizes the allocation of the preliminary purchase price as of the Measure Acquisition Date:

Schedule of allocation preliminary purchase price    
Calculation of Goodwill:  
Net purchase price, including debt paid at close $45,403,394 
     
Plus: fair value of liabilities assumed:    
Deferred revenue  319,422 
Other tangible liabilities  272,927 
Fair value of liabilities assumed $592,349 
     
Less: fair value of assets acquired:    
Cash  486,544 
Other tangible assets  312,005 
Identifiable intangibles  2,668,689 
     
Fair value of assets acquired $3,467,238 
     
Net nonoperating assets  39,775 
Goodwill $42,488,730 

The Company recorded revenue from Measure of $414,388 and an operating loss of $2,257,257 during the period from the Measure Acquisition Date through December 31, 2021.

senseFly

On October 18, 2021 (the “senseFly Acquisition Date”), the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement (the “senseFly S.A. Purchase Agreement”) with Parrot Drones S.A.S. pursuant to which the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of senseFly S.A. from Parrot Drones S.A.S. The aggregate purchase price for the shares of senseFly S.A. is $21,000,000, less the amount of senseFly S.A.’s debt and subject to a customary working capital adjustment. The consideration is also subject to a $4,565,000 holdback to cover any post-closing indemnification claims and to satisfy any purchase price adjustments. The holdback is scheduled to be released in two equal installments, less any amounts paid or reserved for outstanding indemnity claims, on December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023 in accordance with the terms of the senseFly S.A. Purchase Agreement

On October 18, 2021, AgEagle Aerial and the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement (the “senseFly Inc. Purchase Agreement”) with Parrot Inc. pursuant to which AgEagle Aerial agreed to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of senseFly Inc. from Parrot Inc. The aggregate purchase price for the shares of senseFly Inc. is $2,000,000, less the amount of senseFly Inc.’s debt and subject to a customary working capital adjustment. The consideration is also subject to a $435,000 holdback to cover any post-closing indemnification claims and to satisfy any purchase price adjustments. The holdback is scheduled to be released in two equal installments, less any amounts paid or reserved for outstanding indemnity claims, on December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023 in accordance with the terms of the senseFly Inc. Purchase Agreement.

A portion of the consideration under the senseFly S.A. Purchase Agreement comprises shares of Common Stock of the Company, par value $0.001, having an aggregate value of $3,000,000, based on a volume weighted average trading price of the Common Stock over a ten consecutive trading day period prior to the date of issuance of the shares of Common Stock to Parrot Drones S.A.S. The shares of Common Stock are issuable ninety days after the closing date of the transaction. Pursuant to the terms of the senseFly S.A. Purchase Agreement and a Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2021, the Company filed a Form S-3 Registration Statement (the “senseFly Registration Statement”) with the SEC covering the resale of the Common Stock issued to Parrot Drones S.A.S. The senseFly Registration Statement was declared effective on February 9, 2022. The Company agreed to use its best efforts to keep the senseFly Registration Statement effective and in compliance with the provisions of the Securities Act (including by preparing and filing with the SEC such amendments, including post-effective amendments, and supplements to the senseFly Registration Statement and the prospectus used in connection therewith as may be necessary) until all the shares of Common Stock and other securities issued to Parrot Drones S.A.S. and covered by such Registration Statement have been disposed. Parrot Drones S.A.S. reimbursed the Company $50,000 for reasonable legal fees and expenses incurred by the Company in connection with such registration.

Pursuant to the senseFly S.A. Purchase Agreement, Parrot S.A.S., senseFly S.A. and the Company entered into a six-month transition services agreement and a technology license and support agreement during which time Parrot Drones S.A.S. will provide senseFly S.A. with certain information technology and related transition services. Under the technology license and support agreement, Parrot Drones S.A.S. granted to senseFly S.A. a non-exclusive worldwide perpetual license, subject to certain termination rights of the parties, with respect to certain technology used in the fixed-wing drone manufacturing business of senseFly S.A.


The Company has performed a preliminary valuation analysis of the fair market value of the assets to be acquired and liabilities to be assumed. Using the total consideration for the Acquisition, the Company has estimated the allocations to such assets and liabilities. The final purchase price allocation will be determined when the Company completes the detailed valuations and necessary calculations. The final allocation could differ materially from the preliminary allocation used in the pro forma adjustments. The final allocation may include (1) changes in fair values of tangible assets; (2) changes in allocations to intangible assets such as trade names, developed technology and customer relationships, as well as goodwill; and (3) other changes to assets and liabilities.

The following table summarizes the allocation of the preliminary purchase price as of the senseFly Acquisition Date:

Schedule of allocation preliminary purchase price    
Calculation of Goodwill:  
Net purchase price $20,774,526 
     
Plus: fair value of liabilities assumed:    
Current liabilities  3,913,386 
Defined benefit plan obligation  278,823 
Debt assumed at close  2,461,721 
Fair value of liabilities assumed $6,653,930 
     
Less: fair value of assets acquired:    
Cash  859,044 
Other tangible assets  6,327,641 
Identifiable intangible assets  7,335,570 
Fair value of assets acquired $14,522,255 
     
Net nonoperating assets  250,624 
Goodwill $12,655,577 

The Company recorded revenue from senseFly of $2,428,858 and an operating loss of $1,803,369 during the period from the senseFly Acquisition Date through December 31, 2021.

Liabilities Related to Business Acquisition Agreements

As of December 31, 2021, liabilities related to acquisition agreements consist of the following:

Liabilities Related To Business Acquisition Agreements    
  December 31, 2021
Holdback related to MicaSense Acquisition Agreement $4,821,512 
Holdback related to Measure Acquisition  5,625,000 
Holdback related to sensefly Acquisition Agreement  8,489,989 
   Total acquisition agreement related liabilities  18,936,501 
Less: Current portion business acquisition agreement-related liabilities  (10,061,501)
Long-term portion of business acquisition agreement-related liabilities $8,875,000 

As of December, 31, 2021, scheduled future maturities of the Company’s business-acquisition related liabilities consist of the following:

scheduled Of future maturities business-acquisition    
Year ending December 31, 2023 $8,875,000 

Pro-Forma Information (Unaudited)

The acquisitions of MicaSense and Measure were completed in the first quarter of 2021, while the acquisition of senseFly was completed during the fourth quarter of 2021. The 2021 Acquired Companies have complementary businesses with their products and services providing a full stack solution for the commercial drone industry. The Company has combined legacy MicaSense, Measure and senseFly pro-forma supplemental information as follows.


The unaudited pro forma information for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was calculated after applying the Company’s accounting policies and the impact of acquisition date fair value adjustments. The pro forma financial information presents the combined results of operations of MicaSense, Measure and senseFly as if these acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2020 after giving to certain pro-forma adjustments. The pro-forma adjustments reflected herein include only those adjustments that are factually supportable and directly attributable to the acquisitions.

These pro forma adjustments include:

Business Acquisition Pro Forma Information       
 For the Year Ended December 31, (Unaudited)
 2021 2020
Revenues$19,564,651  $20,146,276 
Net loss$(36,395,212) $(14,994,871)

Note 6 – Intangibles, Net

As of December 31, 2021, intangible assets, net, other than goodwill, consist of following:

Intangible Assets                        
Name Estimated Life (Years) Balance as of January 1, 2021 Additions Accumulated Amortization Impairment Balance as of December 31, 2021
Intellectual property/technology  5  $231,146  $5,671,026  $(474,878) $  $5,427,294 
Customer base  5   38,400   4,411,499   (402,580)     4,047,319 
Tradenames and trademarks  5   31,040   2,082,338   (128,142)     1,985,236 
Non-compete agreement  4   67,042   901,198   (136,739)     831,501 
Platform development costs  3   72,899   1,097,808   (174,827)     995,880 
Internal use software  3      278,264         278,264 
Total     $440,527  $14,442,133  $(1,317,166) $  $13,565,494 

As of December 31, 2020, intangible assets, net other than goodwill, consist of the following:

Name Estimated Life (Years) Balance as of January 1, 2020 Additions Accumulated Amortization Impairment Balance as of December 31, 2020
Intellectual property/technology  5  $317,826  $  $(86,680) $  $231,146 
Customer base  5   52,800      (14,400)     38,400 
Tradenames and trademarks  5   42,680      (11,640)     31,040 
Non-compete agreement  4   107,267      (40,225)     67,042 
 Platform development costs  3      72,899         72,899 
Total     $520,573  $72,899  $(152,945) $  $440,527 

The weighted average remaining amortization period in years is 5.6 years. Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was $1,317,166 and $152,945, respectively.


For the following fiscal years ending, the future amortization expense is as follows:

Future amortization                            
  December 31,
  2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Thereafter Total
Intellectual property/
technology
 $890,955  $867,559  $809,773  $809,773  $809,773  $1,239,462  $5,427,294 
Customer base  1,149,406   1,148,134   891,150   141,145   141,145   576,340   4,047,319 
Tradenames and trademarks  218,243   215,856   208,096   208,096   208,096   926,848   1,985,236 
Non-compete agreement  474,237   357,264               831,501 
Platform development costs  390,235   390,235   215,408            995,880 
Internal use software  69,566   92,755   92,755   23,189         278,264 
Total $3,192,642  $3,071,803  $2,217,182  $1,182,203  $1,159,014  $2,742,650  $13,565,494 

Note 7 – Goodwill

Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price and the estimated fair value of net assets acquired, when accounted for by the acquisition method of accounting. As of December 31, 2021, the goodwill balance relates to a business acquisition completed in 2015 and to the 2021 Acquired Companies, respectively. (See Note 5)

The annual impairment assessment conducted during the fourth quarter of 2021 indicated that the fair values of the Company’s Drones and Custom Manufacturing and Sensors reporting units exceeded their respective carrying amounts, while the fair value of the SaaS reporting unit was less than the amount reflected in the consolidated balance sheet. The impairment assessment of the SaaS reporting unit considered lower than forecasted sales and profitability along with declining markets conditions and changes in our technologies. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment charge to its SaaS reporting unit of $12,357,921 during the fourth quarter of 2021.

The annual impairment assessment conducted during the fourth quarter of 2020 indicated that the fair values of the Company's Drone and Custom Manufacturing and SaaS reporting units exceeded their respective carrying amounts. Accordingly, no impairment charge was recorded during the fourth quarter of 2020.

As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the change in the carrying value of goodwill for our operating segments (as defined in Note 16), are listed below:

Schedule Of Goodwill                
  Drones and Custom Manufacturing Sensors SaaS Total
Balance as of December 31, 2020 $  $  $3,108,000  $3,108,000 
Acquisitions  18,972,896   12,655,577   42,488,730   74,117,203 
Impairment        (12,357,921)  (12,357,921)
Balance as of December 31, 2021 $18,972,896  $12,655,577  $33,238,809  $64,867,282 

Note 8 – COVID Loans

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was enacted, which included amongst its many provisions, the creation of the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”). As part of the PPP, qualifying businesses were eligible to receive Small Business Administration (“SBA”) loans for use by such businesses for funding payroll, rent and utilities during a designed twenty-four week period through October 21, 2020 (“PPP Loan”). PPP Loans are unsecured, nonrecourse, accrue interest at a rate of one percent per annum, and mature on May 6, 2022. A portion or all of a PPP Loan is forgivable to the extent that an eligible business meets its obligations under the PPP. Additionally, any amounts owed, including unforgiven amounts under the PPP, are payable over two years, though may be extended up to five years upon approval by the SBA.

On May 6, 2020, AgEagle received a PPP Loan in the amount of $107,439. On May 16, 2021, the outstanding principal and accrued interest due under the PPP Loan were forgiven by the SBA. For the year ended, December 31, 2021, the Company recognized a $108,532 gain on extinguishment of debt related to the AgEagle PPP Loan forgiveness, which is presented in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.


In connection with the senseFly Acquisition, the Company assumed the obligations for two COVID Loans originally made by the SBA to senseFly S.A. on July 27, 2020. As of senseFly Acquisition Date, the fair value of the COVID Loans were $1,440,046 (“senseFly COVID Loans”). During the year ended December 31, 2021, senseFly S.A. made the required payments on the senseFly COVID Loans, including principal and accrued interest, aggregating approximately $356,000. As of December 31, 2021, the Company’s outstanding obligations under the senseFly COVID Loans are $1,259,910.

As of December 31, 2021, scheduled principal payments due under the senseFly COVID Loans are as follows:

Schedule of debt disclosure    
Year ending December 31,  
2022 $451,889 
2023  451,889 
2024  89,033 
2025  89,033 
2026  89,033 
Thereafter  89,033 
Total $1,259,910 

Note 9 – Equity

Series C Preferred Stock”)Stock

Each share of Series C Preferred Stock is non-voting (exceptconvertible into a number of shares of our Common Stock equal to the extent requiredquotient determined by law and except for certain consent rights relating to amendingdividing (x) the certificate of incorporation or bylaws, and the like), ranks senior to the common stock with respect to dividends and with respect to distributions upon a deemed dissolution, liquidation or winding-up of the Company, and ranks junior to the Company’s Series A preferred stock and Series B preferred stock with respect to dividends and with respect to distributions upon a deemed dissolution, liquidation or winding-up of the Company. Upon request of the holders, the Company can seek stockholder approval to remove the Issuance Limitation described therein and to allow for further adjustments related to anti-dilution protection, only if such stockholder approval is obtained. The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock has a liquidation preferencestated value of $1,000 per share, and is convertible at the option of the holder atby (y) a conversion price of $0.54. Until the volume weighted average price of our Common Stock on NYSE exceeds $107.50 with average trading volume of 200,000 shares per day for ten consecutive trading days, the conversion price of our Series C Preferred Stock is subject to full-ratchet, anti-dilution price protection. Under that provision, if, while that full-ratchet, anti-dilution price protection is in effect, the Company issues shares of our Common Stock at a price per share (the “Dilutive Price”) that is less than the conversion price, then the conversion price of our Series C Preferred Stock is automatically reduced to be equal to $0.30 per share, or a ratio equal to approximately 3,333the Dilutive Price. The effect of that reduction is that, upon the issuance of shares of common stock for each one (1) share of Series C Convertible PreferredCommon Stock subject to customary adjustments. Dividends are payable on the shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock only if and to the extent that dividends are payable on the common stock into whichat a Dilutive Price, the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible. The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock has no maturity date and canwould be redeemed by the Company beginning twelve months after the closingconvertible into a greater number of the offering or upon a changeshares of control for the redemption price of $1,000 per share, as adjustable as provided in the designation of the Series C Preferredour Common Stock.

 

The Series C Preferred Stock includesanti-dilution protection was initially triggered on December 27, 2018, as a beneficial ownership limitation preventingresult of the Company issuing of the Series D Preferred Stock, (the “Series D Preferred Stock”) as described below. The Series D Preferred Stock had a $0.54 conversion price thereby qualifying as a subsequent equity offering at a price less than $1.53 per share of Common Stock.

During January 2020, Alpha Capital Anstalt (“Alpha”) converted 189 shares of Series C Preferred Stock into more than 9.99% of the number of350,000 shares of common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect toCommon Stock at a conversion price of $0.54 per share of Common Stock.

On April 7, 2020, upon the issuance of shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series CE Preferred Stock. In addition, the Company may not convertStock, (the “Series E Preferred Stock”) offering (see below), a subsequent anti-dilution provision was triggered for the Series C Preferred Stock into a numberwhereby the conversion price was further adjusted from $0.54 per share of Common Stock to $0.25 per share of Common Stock (a “Down Round”), which resulted in approximately 13,248,000 shares of Common Stock being issuable upon conversion of the remaining Series C Preferred Stock. As a result of this Down Round being triggered, the Company recorded a deemed dividend in the amount of $3,841,920, which represented the intrinsic spread between the previous conversion price of $0.54 per share of Common Stock and the adjusted conversion price of $0.25 per share of Common Stock multiplied by 13,248,000 Common Stock shares issuable upon conversion. The deemed dividend was recorded as a reduction of retained earnings and increase in additional paid-in-capital and increased the net loss to common stock which, when aggregated with anystockholders by the same amount in computing basic and fully diluted earnings per share.

During April 2020, Alpha converted 3,312 shares of common stock issued on or after the original issue date and prior to such conversion date in connection with any conversion of Series C Preferred Stock would exceed 1,683,944into 13,247,984 shares of common stock (19.99%Common Stock at a conversion price of the outstanding shares as$0.25. As of the original issue date), subject to adjustment for forward and reverse stock splits, recapitalizations and the like. In the event conversion of theDecember 31, 2020, no Series C Preferred Stock is limited pursuant to these provisions, each holder shall be entitled to a pro rata portion of the issuable maximum.remain issued and outstanding.

 

Pursuant toSeries D Preferred Stock

On December 27, 2018, the anti-dilutive provisions of theCompany entered into Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 11, 2015, which requires the Company to issue additional shares of common stock to adjust the purchase price paid by purchasers in the Company’s March 2015 offering, in the event any shares are sold (or convertible securities are sold),(the “Series D Purchase Agreement”) with a price per share less than the purchase price paid by the March 2015 purchasers subjectan Investor (the “Purchaser”). Pursuant to the terms of the SecuritiesSeries D Purchase Agreement, Alpha Capital Anstalt received 597,461the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) designated a new series of preferred stock, the Series D Preferred Stock, which is non-convertible, provides for an 8% annual dividend, and is subject to optional redemption by the Company (the “Preferred Stock”). The Company issued 2,000 shares of common stock, whichSeries D Preferred Stock and a warrant (the “Series D Warrant”) to purchase 3,703,703 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share of Common Stock, for $2,000,000 in gross proceeds. The shares of Common Stock underling the Series D Warrant are referred to as the “Series D Warrant Shares”. The Company also entered into a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) granting registration rights to the Purchaser with respect to the Series D Warrant Shares.


The Series D Purchase Agreement provides that upon a subsequent financing or financings with net proceeds of at least $500,000, the Company recorded as a $300,000 deemed distribution In addition, the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock conversion ratio equal to approximately 571 shares of common stock for each one (1) share of Preferred Stock reset to approximately 3,333 shares of common stock for each one (1) share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, to be consistent with the termsmust exercise its optional redemption of the Series C ConvertibleD Preferred Stock pursuantand apply any and all net proceeds from such financing(s) to the anti-dilution requirementsredemption in full of the Series B ConvertibleD Preferred Stock. The Series D Preferred Stock is nonconvertible, provides for an 8% annual dividend payable semi-annually, and has liquidation rights senior to the Common Stock, but pari passu with the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock. The Series D Preferred Stock has no voting rights, except that the Company shall not undertake certain corporate actions as set forth in the Certificate of Designation that would materially impact the holders of Series D Preferred Stock without their consent.

The Preferred Stock is subject to optional redemption by the Company at 115% of the stated value of the Series D Preferred Stock outstanding at the time of such redemption, plus any accrued but unpaid dividends and all liquidated damages or other amounts due. Any such optional redemption may only be exercised after giving notice and upon satisfaction of certain equity conditions set forth in the Series D Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation for Nevada Profit Corporations with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada (“Series D Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation”), including (i) all dividends, liquidated damages and other amounts have been paid; (ii) there is an effective registration statement covering the Series D Warrant Shares, or the Series D Warrant Shares can be exercised through a cashless exercise without restriction under Rule 144, (iii) the Series D Warrant Shares are listed on an exchange, (iv) the holder is not in possession of material, non-public information, (v) there is a sufficient number of authorized shares for issuance of all Series D Warrant Shares, and (vi) for each trading day in a period of twenty consecutive trading days prior to the redemption date, the daily trading volume for the Common Stock on the principal trading market exceeds $200,000 per trading day.

On April 7, 2020, upon the issuance of the Series E Preferred Stock, (the “Series E Preferred Stock”) offering (see below), a subsequent anti-dilution provision was triggered for the Series D Warrant Shares whereby the exercise price of the Series D Warrant Shares was adjusted from $0.54 to $0.25 per share of Common Stock (a “Series D Warrant Down Round). Upon the Series D Warrant Down Round being triggered, the Company recognized $208,918 of a deemed dividend for the difference between the fair value of the original warrants right before modification and the fair value of the modified warrants. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the following assumptions: expected life of 3.5 years, expected dividend rate of 0%, volatility of 90.0%, and an interest rate of 0.29%. The deemed dividend to the preferred stockholders was a recorded as additional paid in capital and a reduction of retained earnings and as an increase to net loss attributable to Common Stockholders in computing earnings per share on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

On June 5, 2020, the Company and Alpha entered into a letter agreement whereby they agreed to amend the Original Series D Preferred Stock and terminate the Series D Purchase Agreement. Alpha is a current holder of less than 10% of the Company’s issued and outstanding Common Stock and has no material relationship with the Company.

On June 5, 2020, the Board approved an amendment to the Series D Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation k the “Amended Series D Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation”). The amendment among other things, (i) provided for the ability of the Holder to convert their Series D Preferred Stock, including all accrued, but unpaid dividends, into shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share of the Company, (ii) set a conversion price at $0.54 per share (subject to customary adjustments), and (iii) increased the stated value of the Series D Preferred Stock from $1,000 to $1,116.67. The Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of the Series D Preferred Stock was filed with the Secretary of the State of Nevada effective as of June 8, 2020.

The holder of the Series D Preferred Stock approved the Amended Series D Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation. There is no class or series of stock which is senior to the Series D Preferred Stock as to the payment of distributions upon dissolution of the Company, and therefore the approval of any other class or series of stock of the Company to the amendments to the Series D Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation is not required pursuant to Nevada law.

On the date of the Amended Series D Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation, the Series D Preferred Stock’s fair value of the Company’s Common Stock price was $1.45 per share of the Company’s Common Stock, which is higher than the effective conversion price of $0.54 per share of Company Common Stock that was agreed to on June 5, 2020. Due to the modification of the Series D Preferred Stock, the Company recorded a deemed distributiondividend of $2,500,000 related$3,763,591 representing the intrinsic value of $0.91 per share of Common Stock multiplied by the number of Common Stock shares to be issued upon conversion. The deemed dividend to the down round triggering event of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. In addition, the warrants strike price of $2.75 reset to $0.30, to be consistent with the terms of the Series C ConvertibleD Preferred Stock pursuantstockholders was a recorded as additional paid in capital, a reduction of retained earnings, and an increase to the anti-dilution requirements of the warrants. The Company recorded a deemed distribution of $500,000 relatednet loss attributable to the down round triggering event of the warrants.Common Stockholders in computing basic and fully diluted earnings per share.

 


During 2017, Alpha Capital AnstaltJune 2020, the holder of Series D Preferred Stock converted 1,4121,890 shares of Series B ConvertibleD Preferred Stock, and all outstanding accrued dividends totaling $233,333, into 3,500,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.54 per share of the Company’s Common Stock.

 During the year ended December 31, 2020, the holder of Series D Preferred Stock converted the remaining 110 shares of the Series D Preferred Stock into 5,502,066635,815 shares of common stock.Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.54 per share of Common Stock, which includes an additional 421,308 of Common Stock shares to correct conversions that occurred in June 2020 that were computed using the stated value of $1,000 rather than $1,116.67.

Series E Preferred Stock

 

On October 23, 2017,April 7, 2020, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Series E Purchase Agreement”) with Alpha, Capital Anstalt exercised warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of our common stock for an aggregate exercise price of $300,000 (or $0.30 per share), pursuant to the terms of such warrants, and was issued 1,000,000the agreement, the Board authorized 1,050 shares of common stock.

On November 6, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt exercised warrants to purchase 771,428 sharesa newly designated series of our commonpreferred stock, for an aggregate exercise price of $231,429 (or $0.30 per share), pursuant to the terms of such warrants, and was issued 771,428 shares of common stock.

On December 20, 2017 the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement for the sale of 1,061,750 shares of its Series AE Convertible Preferred Stock. The Series E Convertible Preferred Stock was sold to Alpha Capital Anstaltconvertible at $0.0612$0.25 per share orof Common Stock into an aggregate of $649,791. Pursuant4,200,000 shares of the Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share. The purchase price for the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock was $1,050,000 of which the Company received net proceeds of $1,010,000. The Series E Convertible Preferred Stock has liquidation rights senior to the anti-dilutive provisions of the Series B PreferredCommon Stock, but pari passu with the Series C Preferred Stock and the Series D Preferred Stock. The Series E Convertible Preferred Stock has no voting rights. The conversion price adjusts for stock splits and combinations and is subject to anti-dilution protection for subsequent equity issuances until such time as no shares of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock are outstanding. The Certificate of Designation of the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock was filed with the State of Nevada on April 2, 2020. The Company also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement, granting registration rights to Alpha with respect to the Conversion Shares and Common Stock underlying warrants held by Alpha.

On the date that the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock was consummated, the fair value of the Company’s Common Stock price was $0.37 per share, which was higher than the effective conversion price of $0.25 per share of Common Stock that was agreed to on April 7, 2020. As a result, the Company recognized a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”) of $378,240 on 788 of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock shares representing the intrinsic value of $0.12 per share of Common Stock multiplied by the number of Common Stock shares to be issued upon conversion. The remaining amount of 262 shares was repurchased as described below. The discount to the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock resulting from the BCF is presented as an increase to net loss attributable to Common Stockholders in computing basic and strikefully diluted earnings per share in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

On May 11, 2020, the Company entered into a Series E Purchase Agreement for the sale of Common Stock as described above with Alpha whereby we agreed to repurchase 262 shares of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock with the proceeds from the new issuance. The repurchase of the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock was convertible into 1,048,000 shares of Common Stock at a repurchase price reset from $0.30of $1.06 per share of Common Stock. The Company increased its net loss available to $0.612. TheCommon Stockholders in computing earnings per share for the excess of the consideration paid for the Series E Preferred Convertible Stock over its carrying value totaling $848,880. As of December 31, 2020, no Series E Preferred Convertible Stock remained issued and outstanding.

Capital Stock Issuances

GreenBlock Capital LLC

On May 3, 2019, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with GreenBlock Capital LLC (“Consultant”) for purposes of advising on certain business opportunities. On June 18, 2019, the Company issued 500,000 shares of restricted Common Stock to the Consultant, and the Company recognized $170,000 of stock-based compensation expense at a fair value of $0.34 per share within professional fees on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. On October 31, 2019, the consulting agreement was terminated; however, the Consultant continued to be entitled to receive up to 2,500,000 restricted Common Stock after termination of the consulting agreement, if the achievement of milestones that commenced during the term of the consulting agreement were completed within twenty-four months. On June 30, 2020, the Company issued an additional 250,000 shares of restricted Common Stock.to the Consultant, and recognized stock-based compensation expense of $297,500 at a fair value of $1.19 per share, which was reflected in professional fees in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Subsequent to the aforementioned termination of the consulting agreement, the Consultant sent a demand letter to the Company alleging a breach of this agreement due to the Company’s non-issuance of additional restricted shares of its Common Stock in connection with the Consultant’s alleged achievement of the milestones. As of December 31, 2020, and as a result of this demand, the Company recorded a deemed distributioncontingent loss of $100,000 related to$1,500,000, based upon the down round triggering eventfair market value of $6.00per share of its Common Stock, which was recorded within professional fees on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. For the quarter ended March 31, 2021, the Company recorded additional stock-based compensation expense of $1,407,000, which reflected the issuance of 550,000 additional restricted shares of Common Stock that were issued on May 12, 2021, which resulted in a liability amount of $2,907,000 for purposes of payment of the Series B Preferred Stock,settlement.


December Purchase Agreement

In January 2021, the Series C Preferred Stock andCompany issued 1,057,214 shares of Common stock in connection with a securities purchase agreement (the “December Purchase Agreement”) entered into on December 31, 2020, the warrants, in the aggregate.gross proceeds associated with this exercise were $6,313,943, net of issuance costs.

Exercise of Warrants

 

On February 13, 2018,8, 2021, the Company received $8,305,368 in additional gross proceeds associated with the exercise of 2,516,778 of warrants issued Alpha Capital Anstaltat a price of $3.30 per share in connection with a securities purchase agreement dated August 4, 2020.

Securities Purchase Agreement Dated May 11, 2020

On May 11, 2020, the 200,000Company and an Investor entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “May Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to the Investor in a registered direct offering 2,400,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001, and pre-funded warrants (the “Pre-Funded Warrants”) to purchase up to 3,260,377 shares of Common Stock, for gross proceeds of approximately $6,000,000 (which includes subsequent payment of the exercise price of the Pre-Funded Warrants in the amount of $3,267). The purchase price for each share of Common Stock was $1.06 and the purchase price for each Pre-Funded Warrant was $1.05999. The exercise price for each Warrant was $0.001. Net proceeds from the sale were used to repurchase 262 shares of the Company’s Series C ConvertibleE Preferred Stock, which it was due pursuantconvertible into 1,048,000 shares of Common Stock currently held by the Investor at a repurchase price of $1.06 per share of Common Stock (see below). The Company expects to use the balance for working capital and general corporate purposes. The Company increased net loss available to Common Stockholders in computing earnings per share for the excess of the consideration paid for the Series E Preferred Stock over its carrying value totaling $848,880 as presented on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Pursuant to the terms of the April 27, 2017, Additional IssuanceMay Purchase Agreement, the Company had agreed to certain restrictions on future stock offerings, including that during the 60-day period following the closing, the Company did not issue (or enter into any agreement to issue) any shares of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents, subject to certain exceptions. The exercise price of the Warrants and the shares of the Common Stock issuable upon the exercise thereof were subject to adjustment in the event of any stock dividends and splits, reverse stock split, recapitalization, reorganization, or similar transaction, as described in the Warrants, and were exercisable on a “cashless” basis in certain circumstances.

Securities Purchase Agreement Dated June 24, 2020

On June 24, 2020, the Company and the Investor entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “June Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to the Investor in a registered direct offering 4,407,400 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001, pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 1,956,236 shares of Common Stock, and warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase up to 2,455,476 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.35 per share, for gross proceeds of $7,000,000 (which includes subsequent payment of the exercise price of the Pre-Funded Warrants in the amount of $1,956) and net proceeds of $6,950,000 after issuance costs. Upon exercise of the Warrants in full by the Investor, the Company will receive additional gross proceeds of $3,314,892. The shares of Common Stock underlying the Pre-Funded Warrants and the Warrants are referred to as “June Warrant Shares.”

The purchase price for each share of Common Stock is $1.10 and the purchase price for each Pre-Funded Warrant is $1.099 per share of Common Stock. The exercise price for each Pre-Funded Warrant is $0001. The Shares, Pre-funded Warrants, Warrants and June Warrant Shares are being offered by the Company pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-239157), which was declared effective by the SEC on June 19, 2020.

Pursuant to the terms of the June Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to certain restrictions on future stock offerings, including that during the 75-day period following the closing, the Company will not issue (or enter into any agreement to issue) any shares of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents, subject to certain exceptions, including if the consolidated closing price on the trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is traded at the time is greater than $1.90 (adjusted for any subsequent stock splits or similar capital adjustments) for five consecutive trading days, the Company may issue such securities at not less than $1.90 per Common Stock Equivalent. The Investor has a right from the date of the June Purchase Agreement until December 31, 2020 to participate in a subsequent financing by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries of Common Stock or Common Stock Equivalents for cash consideration, indebtedness or a combination of units thereof (a “Subsequent Financing”), in an amount equal to 50% of the Subsequent Financing on the same terms, conditions and price provided for in the Subsequent Financing.


The exercise price of the Prefunded Warrants and the Warrants and the number of June Warrant Shares issuable upon the exercise thereof will be subject to adjustment in the event of any stock dividends and splits, reverse stock split, recapitalization, reorganization or similar transaction, as described in the Prefunded Warrants and the Warrants. The Warrants will be exercisable on a “cashless” basis only in the event there is no effective registration statement registering, or the prospectus contained therein is not available for the $200,000 paid duringsale of the shares underlying the Warrants. The Pre-Funded Warrants allow for cashless exercise at any time. The Pre-Funded Warrants and the Warrants each contain a beneficial ownership limitation, such that none of such Pre-Funded Warrants nor the Warrants may be exercised, if, at the time of such exercise, the holder would become the beneficial owner of more than 9.99% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock following the exercise of such Pre-Funded Warrant or Warrant. For the year ended December 31, 2017.2020, the Company received $3,314,893 in additional gross proceeds associated with exercise of 2,455,476 of the June Warrant Shares into Common Stock.

 

SubsequentSecurities Purchase Agreement Dated August 4, 2020

On August 4, 2020, the Company and an Investor entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “August Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to December 31, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt converted (a) 343.671which the Company agreed to sell to the Investor in a registered direct offering 3,355,705 shares of Series B Convertible PreferredCommon Stock into 5,610,955and warrants to purchase up to 2,516,778 shares of common stock; and (b) 103.142Common Stock at an exercise price of $3.30 per share (the “August Warrants”), for proceeds of $9,900,000 net of issuance costs of $100,000. Upon exercise of the Warrants in full by the Investor, the Company will receive additional gross proceeds of $8,305,367. The shares of Series C Convertible PreferredCommon Stock into 1,683,944underlying the Warrants are referred to as “August Warrant Shares.”

The purchase price for each share of Common Stock is $2.98. Net proceeds from the sale will be used for working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. The shares, of common stock,the August Warrants and the August Warrant Shares are being offered by the Company pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-239157), which was declared effective on June 19, 2020.

Pursuant to the terms of the August Purchase Agreement, the Company has agreed to certain restrictions on future stock offerings, including that during the 75-day period following the closing, the Company will not issue (or enter into any agreement to issue) any shares of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents, subject to certain exceptions, including if the consolidated closing price on the trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is traded at the time is greater than $5.00 (adjusted for any subsequent stock splits or similar capital adjustments) for ten consecutive trading days, the Company may issue such securities.securities at not less than $5.00 per Common Stock Equivalent. In addition, the Company’s executive officers and directors agreed that they shall not sell (or hedge in any manner) any of their shares of the Common Stock for a period ending September 7, 2020. The Investor has a right from the date of the August Purchase Agreement until December 31, 2020, to participate in a subsequent financing by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries of Common Stock or Common Stock Equivalents for cash consideration, indebtedness or a combination of units thereof (a “Subsequent Financing”), in an amount equal to 50% of the Subsequent Financing on the same terms, conditions and price provided for in the Subsequent Financing.

 

The exercise price of the August Warrants and the number of August Warrant Shares issuable upon the exercise thereof will be subject to adjustment in the event of any stock dividends and splits, reverse stock split, recapitalization, reorganization or similar transaction, as described in the Warrants. The Warrants will be exercisable on a “cashless” basis only in the event there is no effective registration statement registering, or the prospectus contained therein is not available for the sale of the shares underlying the August Warrants. The August Warrants contain a beneficial ownership limitation, such that none of such August Warrants may be exercised, if, at the time of such exercise, the holder would become the beneficial owner of more than 9.99% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock following the exercise of such August Warrant. The August Warrant is for a ten-month term and is not exercisable for the first six months.

Securities Purchase Agreement Dated December 31, 2020

On December 31, 2020, the Company, and an Investor entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “December Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to the Investor in a registered direct offering pre-funded warrants (the “December Pre-Funded Warrants”) to purchase up to 1,057,214 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 Common Stock, for gross proceeds of approximately $6.4 million (which includes subsequent payment of the exercise price of the December Pre-Funded Warrants in the amount of $1,057). The shares of Common Stock underlying the December Pre-Funded Warrants are referred to as the “December Warrant Shares.”

The purchase price for each December Pre-Funded Warrant is $6.029, the exercise price for each December Pre-Funded Warrant is $0.001. Net proceeds from the sale will be used for working capital. The December Pre-Funded Warrants and the December Warrant Shares are being offered by the Company pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-239157), which was declared effective on June 19, 2020.


Pursuant to the terms of the December Purchase Agreement, the Company has agreed to certain restrictions on future stock offerings, including that during the 45-trading day period following the closing, the Company will not issue (or enter into any agreement to issue) any shares of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents, subject to certain limited exceptions. The Investor has a right from the date of the December Purchase Agreement until April 30, 2021 to participate in a subsequent financing by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents for cash consideration, indebtedness or a combination of units thereof (a “Subsequent Financing”), in an amount equal to 50% of the Subsequent Financing on the same terms, conditions and price provided for in the Subsequent Financing.

The exercise price of the December Prefunded Warrants and the number of December Warrant Shares issuable upon the exercise thereof will be subject to adjustment in the event of any stock dividends and splits, reverse stock split, recapitalization, reorganization or similar transaction, as described in the December Prefunded Warrants. The December Pre-Funded Warrants allow for cashless exercise at any time. The December Pre-Funded Warrants contain a beneficial ownership limitation such that none of the December Pre-Funded Warrants may be exercised, if, at the time of such exercise, the holder would become the beneficial owner of more than 9.99% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock following the exercise of such December Pre-Funded Warrants.

Filing of Registration Statement

Pursuant to the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement executed on April 7, 2020, the Company filed an initial registration statement with the SEC registering the Conversion Shares and the April Warrant Shares on April 27, 2020. The Company’s registration statement was declared effective May 6, 2020.

Filing of Registration Statement for At-the-Market Sales Agreement

Pursuant to the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement executed on February 5, 2021, the Company filed an initial registration statement with the SEC for up to $200,000,000 of securities which may be issued by the Company from time to time in indeterminate amounts and at indeterminate times.

On May 25, 2021, the Company entered into an at-the-market Sales Agreement (the “ATM Sales Agreement”) with Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated and Raymond James & Associates, Inc. as sales agents (the “Agents”), in connection with the offer and sale from time to time of shares of the Company’s Common stock, having an aggregate offering price of up to $100,000,000 (the “ATM Shares”), through an at-the-market equity offering program (the “ATM Offering”).

The ATM Shares are being offered and sold pursuant to the Company’s shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-252801), which was filed with the SEC on February 5, 2021, and declared effective on May 6, 2021. A prospectus supplement relating to the ATM Offering was filed with the SEC on May 25, 2021.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the ATM Sales Agreement, the Agents will use reasonable efforts, consistent with its normal trading and sales practices and applicable law and regulations to sell ATM Shares from time to time based upon the Company’s instructions, including any price, time or size limits or other customary parameters or conditions the Company may impose.

Under the Sales Agreement, the Agents may sell ATM Shares by any method permitted by law deemed to be an “at the market offering” as defined in Rule 415 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the rules and regulations thereunder, including, without limitation, sales made by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions, directly on or through NYSE American LLC, on or through any other national securities exchange or facility thereof, a trading facility of a national securities association, an alternative trading system, or any other market venue, in fiscalthe over-the-counter market, in privately negotiated transactions, to or through a market maker or a combination of any such methods. The Company agreed to pay the Agents a commission equal to 3% of the gross proceeds from the sales of ATM Shares pursuant to the Sales Agreement.

The ATM Sales Agreement contains customary representations and warranties and also contains customary indemnification obligations of the Company and the Agents, including for liabilities under the Securities Act, other obligations of the parties and termination provisions.


The provisions of the ATM Sales Agreement, including the representations and warranties contained therein, are not for the benefit of any party other than the parties to such agreement and are not intended as documents for investors and the public to obtain factual information about the current state of affairs of the parties to those documents and agreements. Rather, investors and the public should look to other disclosures contained in the Company’s filings with the SEC.

During the period from May 26, 2021 through December 31, 2021, the Company sold 5,705,877 shares of its Common Stock, par value $0.001, at a stock price between $5.00 and $6.30 per share, for proceeds of $30,868,703, net of issuance costs of $954,707.

2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan

On March 26, 2018, the 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”) became effective. Under the Equity Plan, the Company may grant equity-based and other incentive awards to officers, employees, and directors of, and consultants and advisers to, the Company. The purpose of the Equity Plan is to help the Company attract, motivate, and retain such persons and thereby enhance shareholder value. The Equity Plan shall continue in effect, unless sooner terminated, until the tenth (10th) anniversary of the date on which it is adopted by the Board (except as to awards outstanding on that date). The Board in its discretion may terminate the Equity Plan at any time with respect to any shares for which awards have not theretofore been granted; provided, however, that the Equity Plan’s termination shall not materially and adversely impair the rights of a holder, without the consent of the holder, with respect to any award previously granted. On June 18, 2019, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company, the shareholders approved a proposal to increase the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Equity Plan from 2,000,000 to 3,000,000.

On July 15, 2020, the Company held its 2020 annual meeting of stockholders and approved a proposal to increase the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Equity Plan from 3,000,000 to 4,000,000. To the extent that an award lapses, expires, is canceled, is terminated unexercised or ceases to be exercisable for any reason, or the rights of its holder terminate, any shares subject to such award shall again be available for the grant of a new award. The number of shares for which awards which are options or stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) may be granted to a participant under the Equity Plan during any calendar year is limited to 500,000. For purposes of qualifying awards as “performance-based” compensation under Code Section 162(m), the maximum amount of cash compensation that may be paid to any person under the Equity Plan in any single calendar year shall be $500,000.

On June 16, 2021, the Company held its 2021 annual meeting of stockholders and approved a proposal to increase the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Equity Plan from 4,000,000 to 10,000,000. To the extent that an award lapses, expires, is canceled, is terminated unexercised or ceases to be exercisable for any reason, or the rights of its holder terminate, any shares subject to such award shall again be available for the grant of a new award. The number of shares for which awards which are options or SARs may be granted to a participant under the Equity Plan during any calendar year is limited to 500,000. For purposes of qualifying awards as “performance-based” compensation under Code Section 162(m), the maximum amount of cash compensation that may be paid to any person under the Equity Plan in any single calendar year shall be $500,000.

The Company awards restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to employees, which have restriction periods tied primarily to continued service through the vesting period. Unless otherwise approved by the Board, RSUs have cliff vesting periods ranging from one to two years, though the Board may approve RSU awards that vest immediately or over a shorter period, which results in stock-based compensation expense being recognized in total on the date of grant or over the shorter vesting period.

The Company awards stock options to employees and to the Board of Directors. Stock option awards vest in equal annual installments over two years from the date of grant, though the Board may approve stock option awards that vest immediately, which results in stock-based compensation expense being recognized in total on the date of grant.

The Company determines the fair value of awards granted under the Equity Plan based on the fair value of its Common Stock on the date of grant.

Stock-based compensation expenses related to grants under the Equity Plan are included in general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.


RSUs

For the year ended December 31, 20162021, RSU activity consisted of the following:

Schedule of restricted stock unit activity        
  Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested as of December 31, 2020  100,000  $1.34 
Granted  1,392,402  $3.99 
Canceled  (91,667) $5.40 
Released  (253,485) $3.39 
Vested  (325,845) $5.34 
Non-vested as of December 31, 2021  821,405  $3.16 

For the year ended December 31, 2021, the aggregate fair value of RSU awards at the time of vesting was $5,555,503.

 

ThereAs of December 31, 2021, the Company had approximately $2,138,000 of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to RSUs, which will be amortized over approximately twenty-two months.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, there were no equity transactions100,000 RSUs that were issued to Mr. Drozd at a fair market value of $1.34 on the date of grant.

Issuance of RSUs

On November 12, 2021, the Board, in connection 2021 executive compensation plan, approved awards of 75,000 RSUs each to Mr. Brandon Torres Declet (“Mr. Torres Declet”), the then Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ms. Nicole Fernandez-McGovern (“Ms. Fernandez-McGovern”), the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Operations, respectively. The Company determined the fair market value of these RSUs to be $441,000 based on the market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the grant date For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized $144,725 in stock-based compensation expense related to the RSU awards.

During the fourth quarter of 2021, the Board approved a grant of 611,000 RSUs to non-executive employees of the Company. The Company determined the fair market value of these RSUs to be $1,761,340 based on the market price of the Company’s Common Stock at the respective grant dates. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized $218,319 in stock-based compensation expense related to these awards.

On May 24, 2021, and as a part of a separation agreement between Company and Mr. J. Michael Drozd ("Mr. Drozd"), the Company's former Chief Executive Officer, the Company issued to Mr. Drozd 145,152 RSUs, which vested immediately. These RSUs were valued at, and for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Option transactions

Officers (including officers who are members2021 the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $680,783 based upon the market price of the BoardCompany's Common Stock of Directors), directors, employees and consultants are eligible to receive options under our stock option plans.  We administer the stock option plans and we determine those persons to whom options will be granted, the number of options to be granted, the provisions applicable to each grant and the time periods during which the options may be exercised.  No options may be granted more than ten years after$4.69 per share on the date of grant of these RSUs. (See Note 13)

On May 4, 2021, the adoptionBoard approve a grant to Ms. Fernandez-McGovern of 111,250 RSUs, which vested immediately. These RSUs were valued at, and for the year ended December 31, 2021, and the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $640,800 based upon the market price of the stock option plans.Company's Common Stock of $5.76 per share on the date of grant of these RSUs.

 

Each option granted underOn April 19, 2021, the stock option plans willBoard approved, in connection with the Measure Acquisition, an award of 10,000 RSUs to Mr. Jesse Stepler upon his appointment of as senior management of Measure. The Company determined the fair market value of these RSUs to be exercisable for a term$54,000 based on the market price of not more than ten years afterthe Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant. Certain other restrictions will applyThese RSUs vest equally on a pro-rata basis over one year of continued employment. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized $37,824 in stock-based compensation expense related to this award.

On April 19, 2021, the Board approved, in connection with the plans when someMeasure Acquisition, an award of 125,000 RSUs was granted to Mr. Declet upon his appointment as senior management of the Company. The Company determined the fair market value of these RSUs to be $675,000 based on the market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant. These RSUs vest equally on a pro-rata basis over one year of continued employment. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized $472,856 in stock-based compensation expense related to this award.


On April 19, 2021, the Board, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board (“Compensation Committee”), approved awards mayof 100,000 and 125,000 RSUs to Mr. Drozd, and Ms. Fernandez-McGovern, respectively, and in accordance with their applicable amended respective employment letters. The Company determined the fair market value of these RSUs to be exercised.  In$1,215,000 based on the eventmarket price of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant. These RSUs vest equally on a changepro-rata basis over one year of control (as definedcontinued employment. Upon Mr. Drozd’s separation from the Company, 91,667 RSUs were canceled. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized $517,854 in the stock option plans), the vesting date on which all options outstanding under the stock option plans may first be exercised will be accelerated.  Generally, all options terminate 90 days after a change of control. stock-based compensation expense related to these awards.

 

On March 5, 2021, the Company issued to Ms. Fernandez-McGovern and a non-executive employee 10,000 RSUs and 5,000 RSUs, respectively, which vested immediately. These RSUs were valued at, and for the year ended December 31, 2021, and the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $87,600 based upon the market price of the Company’s Common Stock Incentive Planof $5.84 per share on the date of grant of these RSUs.

On May 18, 2020, the Company issued in connection with the commencement of employment of its Chief Executive Officer, 100,000 RSUs which fully vested after one year of continued employment. The Company determined the fair-market value of the restricted stock units to be $134,000. In connection with the issuance of these restricted stock units, the Company recognized $50,518 in stock compensation expense for the twelve months ended December 31 and $82,786 in stock compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Stock Options

 

The Boardfair values of Directors approvedstock options granted during the EnerJex Resources, Inc. Stock Option Plan on August 1, 2002 (the “2002-2003 Stock Option Plan”). Originally,years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were determined using the total numberBlack-Scholes option valuation model. The expected term of options granted is based on the simplified method in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 and represents the period of time that couldoptions granted are expected to be granted underoutstanding. The Company makes assumptions with respect to expected stock price volatility based on the 2002-2003 Stock Option Plan was notaverage historical volatility of peers with similar attributes. In addition, the Company determines the risk-free rate by selecting the U.S. Treasury with maturities similar to exceed 26,666 shares. In September 2007 our stockholders approved a proposal to amend and restate the 2002-2003 Stock Option Plan to increaseexpected terms of grants, quoted on an investment basis in effect at the numbertime of shares issuable to 66,666.  On October 14, 2008 our stockholders approved a proposal to amend and restate the 2002-2003 Stock Option Plan to (i) rename it the EnerJex Resources, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive Plan”), (ii) increase the maximum number of shares of our common stockgrant for that may be issued under the Stock Incentive Plan to 83,333, and (iii) add restricted stock as an eligible award that can be granted under the Stock Incentive Plan.business day.

 

2013For the year ended December 31, 2021, the significant assumptions relating to the valuation of the Company’s stock options granted were as follows:

Schedule of Share-based Payment Award, Stock Options, Valuation Assumptions
December 31, 2021
Dividend yield0
Expected life (years)5.91
Expected volatility83.10%
Risk-free interest rate1.42%

For the year ended December 31, 2021, a summary of the options activity is as follows:

Summary of Stock Options                    
  Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Fair Value Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding as of December 31, 2020  2,255,267  $1.46  $0.82   5.31  $10,247,548 
Granted  1,049,500  $5.31  $2.85   3.01  $ 
Exercised  (513,500) $0.24  $0.15     $675,363 
Expired/Forfeited  (249,600) $5.50  $2.96     $7,277 
Outstanding as of December 31, 2021  2,541,667  $2.88  $1.57   4.27  $1,244,029 
Exercisable as of December 31, 2021  1,548,083  $1.97  $1.10   4.14  $1,178,340 

As of December 31, 2021, the Company had approximately $2,036,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options, which will be amortized over approximately twenty-four months.

Intrinsic value is measured using the fair market value at the date of exercise (for shares exercised) or as of December 31, 2021 (for outstanding options), less the applicable exercise price.


For the year ended December 31, 2020, the significant assumptions relating to the valuation of the Company’s stock options granted were as follows:

Schedule of Share-based Payment Award, Stock Options, Valuation Assumptions
December 31, 2020
Dividend yield0
Expected life (years)3.8
Expected volatility87.11%
Risk-free interest rate0.19%

For the year ended December 31, 2020, a summary of the options activity is as follows:

Summary of Stock Options                    
  Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Fair Value Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding as of December 31, 2019  2,480,470  $0.39  $0.27   6.28  $378,111 
Granted  876,167  $3.27  $1.80   4.71  $2,392,368 
Exercised  (881,898) $0.19  $0.16     $4,141,581 
Expired/Forfeited  (219,472) $1.63  $1.04     $927,616 
Outstanding as of December 31, 2020  2,255,267  $1.46  $0.82   5.31  $10,247,548 
Exercisable at period end  1,097,268  $0.38  $0.24   5.58  $6,164,209 

As of December 31, 2021, the Company had approximately $1,657,221 of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to stock options, which will be amortized over approximately twenty-four months.

Options Issuances

For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company issued to non-executives employees options to purchase 469,500 shares of Common Stock Incentive Planat exercise prices ranging from $1.44 to $5.42 per share, which expire on dates between January 3, 2025 and December 31, 2026. The Company determined the fair market value of these unvested options to be $1,759,843. In connection with the issuance of these options, the Company recognized $629,999 in stock-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2021.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company issued to directors and officers options to purchase 580,000 shares of Common Stock at exercise prices ranging from $0.84 to $3.37 per share, which expire on dates between January 3, 2025 and December 31, 2026. The Company determined the fair market value of these unvested options to be $1,231,400. In connection with the issuance of these options, the Company recognized $286,312 in stock-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2021.

 

The BoardCompany previously issued options to purchase 2,593,371 shares of Common Stock to directors and stockholders approved the adoptionnon-executive employees of the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (“Plan”). The Plan reserves 333,300 shares of our common stock forCompany at exercise prices ranging from $0.06 to $3.18 per share, expiring on dates between March 30, 2023, and September 29, 2029. In connection with the granting of options and issuance of restricted sharesthese options to our employees officers,and directors, the Company recognized $85,163 and consultants. The Plan increases reserved shares annually based on plan provisions.

In 2017 and 2016, no options were granted to any employees or directors.

We expensed $13,690 and $241,669$247,180 in stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 20172021 and 2020, respectively.

For the years ended December 31, 20162021 and 2020, as a result of employee terminations and options expirations, stock options aggregating 257,932 and 212,340, respectively, for options granted.with fair market values of $764,034 and $221,982, respectively, were cancelled.

 


Issuance of Common Stock for Acquisitions

On April 27, 2021, the Company issued 540,541 shares of Common Stock in connection with the MicaSense Purchase Agreement based on a volume weighted average trading price of the Common Stock over a ten consecutive trading day period prior to the date of issuance of these shares of Common Stock at the fair market value of $3,000,000.

On April 19, 2021, the Company issued 5,319,145 shares of Common Stock in connection with the Measure Purchase Agreement based on a volume weighted average trading price of the Common Stock over a ten consecutive trading day period prior to the date of issuance of these shares of Common Stock at the fair market value of $24,375,000.

See Note 17 for further detail.

Note 10 – Retirement Plans

Defined Benefit Plan

senseFly S.A. sponsors a defined benefit pension plan (the “Defined Benefit Plan”) covering all its employees. The Defined Benefit Plan provides benefits in the event of retirement, death or disability, with benefits based on age and salary. The Defined Benefit Plan is funded through contributions paid by senseFly S.A. and its employees, respectively. The Defined Benefit Plan assets are administered by Groupe Mutuel Prévoyance (“GMP”), which invests these plan assets in cash and cash equivalents, equities, bonds, real estate and alternative investments.

The Projected Benefit Obligation (“PBO”) includes in full the accrued liability for the plan death and disability benefits, irrespective of the extent to which these benefits may be reinsured with an insurer. The actuarial valuations are based on the census data as of October 31, 2021, provided by GMP.

The Company recognizes the overfunded or underfunded status of the Defined Benefit Plan as an asset or liability in its consolidated balance sheets and recognizes changes in the funded status of the Defined Benefit Plan in the year in which the changes occur through accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. The Defined Benefit Plan’s assets and benefit obligations are remeasured as of December 31st each year.

For the period from October 18, 2021 (the “senseFly Acquisition Date) through December 31, 2021, the net periodic benefit cost of the Defined Benefit Plan was as follows:

Schedule Of Net Benefit Costs    
  2021
Service cost $87,368 
Interest cost  3,236 
Expected return on plan assets  (19,415)
Net periodic pension benefit cost $71,189 

The PBO is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants, including the effect of assumed future salary increases. For the period from the senseFly Acquisition Date through December 31, 2021,the changes in the projected benefit obligation were as follows:

Schedule Of Costs Of Retirement Plans    
  2021
PBO, beginning of period $3,999,708 
Service cost  87,368 
Interest cost  3,236 
Plan participation contributions  52,852 
Actuarial gains  92,761 
Benefits paid through plan assets  (9,708)
Plan amendments related to statutory changes  (16,179)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes  (254)
PBO, end of period  4,209,784 
Component representing future salary increases  (19,450)
Accumulated benefit obligation (“ABO”), end of period $4,190,334 


For the period from the senseFly Acquisition Date through December 31, 2021, the change in fair value of the Pension Plan assets were as follows:

Schedule Of Changes In Fair Value Of Plan Assets    
  2021
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of period $3,720,885 
Expected return on plan assets  19,415 
Gain on plan assets  8,629 
Employer contributions  86,289 
Plan participant contributions  52,852 
Benefits paid through plan assets  (9,707)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes  (305)
Fair value of plan assets, end of period $3,878,058 

senseFly S.A.’s investment objectives are to ensure that the assets of its Defined Benefit Plan are invested to provide an optimal rate of investment return on the total investment portfolio, consistent with the assumption of a reasonable risk level, and to ensure that pension funds are available to meet the plans’ benefit obligations as they become due. senseFly S.A. believes that a well-diversified investment portfolio will result in the highest attainable investment return with an acceptable level of overall risk. Investment strategies and allocation decisions are also governed by applicable governmental regulatory agencies. senseFly’s investment strategy with respect to the Defined Benefit Plan is to invest in accordance with the following allocation: 30.93% in equities, 34.94% in bonds, 15.46% in real estate, 9.28% in alternative investments and 9.39% in cash and cash equivalents.

As of December 31, 2021, the following table presents the fair value of the Defined Benefit Plan assets by major categories and by levels within the fair value hierarchy:

Defined Benefit Plan Plan Assets Categories               
                
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Cash and equivalents$364,142  $  $  $364,142 
Equity securities 1,199,399         1,199,399 
Bonds 1,354,997         1,354,997 
Real estate    599,700      599,700 
Alternative investments    359,820      359,820 
Total fair value of plan assets$2,918,538  $959,520  $  $3,878,058 

As of December 31, 2021, the following table presents the unfunded status of the Defined Benefit Plan, defined as plan assets less the projected benefit obligation:

Schedule Of Unfunded Defined Benefit Plan Assets   2021 
Fair value of plan assets $3,878,058 
Less: PBO  (4,209,784)
Underfunded status, end of period $(331,726)

As of December 31, 2021, the underfunded status is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

The Defined Benefit Plan has an ABO and PBO in excess of Defined Benefit Plan assets. For the period from the senseFly Acquisition Date through December 31, 2021, the amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the Defined Benefit Plan were as follows:

Schedule Of Accumulated Benefit Obligations In Excess Of Fair Value Of Plan Assets    
  2021
Net prior service cost $16,208 
Net loss  (84,111)
Deferred tax   
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax $(67,903)

As of December 31, 2021, the net prior service credit included in accumulated other comprehensive loss is expected to be recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost during the year ending December 31, 2022.

The actuarial assumptions for the Defined Benefit Plan were as follows:

Schedule Of Assumptions Defined Benefit Plan
Benefit obligations:
Discount rate0.30%
Estimated rate of compensation increase1.00%
Periodic costs:
Discount rate0.30%
Estimated rate of compensation increase1.00%
Expected average rate of return on plan assets2.66%


The following table presents the expected benefit payments from the Defined Benefit Plan for the next five fiscal years and the aggregate five years thereafter:

Schedule Of Expected Benefit Payments    
Year ending December 31: Expected Plan Benefit Payments
2022 $430,055 
2023  414,927 
2024  394,397 
2025  372,786 
2026  352,256 
2027-2031  1,483,581 
Total expected benefit payments by the plan $3,448,002 

Defined Contribution Plan

The Company sponsors the AgEagle Aerial Systems 401(k) Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) that covers substantially all eligible employees in the United States. The Company matches contributions made by eligible employees, subject to certain percentage limits of the employees’ earnings. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company’s employer contribution to the 401(k) Plan was $11,127.

Note 11 – Warrants to Purchase Common Stock

Warrants Issued

On June 24, 2020, the Company entered into a purchase agreement, described above in Note 7, pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to the Investor in a registered direct offering June Warrant Shares to purchase up to 2,455,476 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.35 per share.

On August 4, 2020, the Company entered into a purchase agreement, described above in Note 7, pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to the Investor in a registered direct offering Warrants to purchase up to 2,516,778 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $3.30 per share. Upon exercise of the Warrants in full by the Investor, the Company will receive additional gross proceeds of approximately $8,305,367.

As of December 31, 2020, the Company had outstanding warrants, in connection with the issuance of securities purchase agreement dated August 4, 2020, to purchase 2,516,778 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at an exercise price of $3.30 with an expiration date on June 6, 2021.

Warrant Conversions

On December 27, 2018, the Company issued 2,000 shares of Series D Warrant to purchase 3,703,703 shares of the Company’s Common Stock for $2,000,000 in gross proceeds. The shares of Common Stock underlying the Warrant are referred to as the “Warrant Shares.” The Company also entered into a registration rights agreement granting registration rights to the Purchaser with respect to the Warrant Shares.

The Warrant is exercisable for a period of five years through December 26, 2023 at an exercise price equal to $0.54 per share; and is subject to customary adjustments for stock splits dividend, rights offerings, pro rata distributions and fundamental transactions. In addition, in the event the Company undertakes a subsequent equity financing or financings at an effective price per share that is less than $0.54, the exercise price of the Warrant shall be reduced to the lower price.  

On April 7, 2020, upon the issuance of the Series E Preferred Stock, offering, a subsequent anti-dilution provision was triggered for the Series D Warrant whereby the exercise price of the Warrant Shares was adjusted from $0.54 to $0.25 per share a Warrant Down Round. (See Note 9)

In connection with an issuance of debentures in 2017, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 828,221 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.51 with an expiration date on August 2, 2024. These warrants were exercised at a cashless price of $1.51 per share on September 22, 2020 into 405,716 shares of common stock.


In July 2020, the Company received $2,632,500 in additional gross proceeds associated with exercise of 1,950,000 of the June Warrant Shares into Common Stock. During December 2020, the Company received $682,393 in additional gross proceeds associated with exercise of 505,476 shares of the June Warrant.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, 6,987,400 warrants were converted into 5,808,931 shares of Common Stock at a weighted average conversion price of $0.79. The Company received cash proceeds of $3,314,893 associated with exercise of the warrants.

On February 8, 2021, the Company received $8,305,368 in additional gross proceeds associated with the exercise of 2,516,778 of warrants issued at a price of $3.30 in connection with a securities purchase agreement dated August 4, 2020.

As of December 31, 2021, there were 0 warrants outstanding.

A summary of stock optionsactivity related to warrants for the periods presented is as follows:

 

      Weighted Ave.     Weighted Ave. 
   Options  Exercise Price  Warrants  Exercise Price 
              
Outstanding January 1, 2016   288,331  $10.17   1,904,286  $2.75 
Granted             
Cancelled   (80,667)  (7.15)      
Exercised             
Outstanding December 31, 2016   207,664  $9.69   1,904,286  $2.75 
Granted             
Cancelled          
Exercised   (192,332)  (10.5)  (1,771,428  0.30 
Outstanding December 31, 2017   15,332  $7.63   132,858  $0.30 
Summary of activity related to warrants            
  Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term
Outstanding as of December 31, 2019  4,531,924  $0.72   4.05 
Issued  4,972,254   2.34   0.92 
Exercised  (6,987,400)  0.79    
Outstanding as of December 31, 2020  2,516,778  $3.30   0.83 
Issued         
Exercised  (2,516,778) $3.30    
Outstanding as of December 31, 2021    $    
Exercisable as of December 31, 2021    $    

Note 12 – Leases

Operating Leases

 

The numberCompany determines if an arrangement is or contains a lease at contract inception and recognizes a right-of-use asset and a lease liability at the lease commencement date.  Leases with an initial term of twelve months or less, but greater than one month, are not recorded on the balance sheet for select asset classes.  The lease liability is measured at the present value of future lease payments as of the lease commencement date, or the opening balance sheet date for leases existing at adoption of ASC 842.  The right-of-use asset recognized is based on the lease liability adjusted for prepaid and deferred rent and unamortized lease incentives.

Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease terms at the commencement dates.  The Company uses its incremental borrowing rates as the discount rate for its leases, which is equal to the rate of interest the Company would have to pay on a collateralized basis to borrow an amount equal to the lease payments under similar terms. The incremental borrowing rate for all existing leases as of the opening balance sheet date was based upon the remaining terms of the leases; the incremental borrowing rate for all new or amended leases is based upon the lease terms.  The lease terms for all the Company’s leases include the contractually obligated period of the leases, plus any additional periods covered by options to extend the leases that were vested atthe Company is reasonably certain to exercise.

Certain adjustments to the right-of-use asset may be required for items such as initial direct costs paid or incentives received. The components of a lease are split into three categories: lease components, non-lease components and non-components; however, the Company has elected to combine lease and non-lease components into a single component. Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and is included in general and administrative expense on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Variable lease payments are expensed as incurred.

The Company has an operating lease in Wichita, Kansas, which serves as its corporate offices. The lease commencement date was November 1, 2020, and will expire on October 31, 2023, unless sooner terminated or extended. The estimated cash rent payments due through the expiration of this operating lease total $181,500.


As a result of the MicaSense Acquisition, the Company assumed an operating lease for office space in Seattle, Washington that expires in January 2026 with a 3% per year increase, and two months of abated rent for December 2020 and January 2021. The estimated cash rent payments due through the expiration of this operating lease total approximately $891,000.

As a result of the Measure Acquisition, the Company assumed the operating leases for office space in Washington, D.C. and Austin, Texas. The prior operating lease in Washington, D.C. expired in September 2021 and the current operating lease in Austin, Texas expires in December 2021. The Company signed a new operating lease agreement for its office space in Washington, D.C. in July 2021, beginning on October 1, 2021 and expiring in December 2022. Additionally, the Company signed a new operating lease agreement for its office space in Austin, Texas commencing in August 2021 and expiring in December 2022. The estimated cash rent payments due through the expiration these two operating leases total approximately $208,000.

As a result of the senseFly acquisition, the Company assumed the operating leases for office spaces in Raleigh, North Carolina and Lausanne, Switzerland. The operating lease in Raleigh expires in December 2022, while the operating lease in Lausanne expires in April 2023. The estimated cash rent payments due through the expiration of these two operating leases total approximately $1,057,000.

As of December 31, 2017 was 15,332. The were no options that were not vested at2021 and 2020, consolidated operating lease liabilities of $2,178,381 and $257,363, are recorded net of accumulated amortization of $282,668 and $13,823, respectively.

As of December 31, 2017.2021 and 2020, balance sheet information related to the Company’s operating leases is as follows:

Schedule of Future Minimum Rental Payments for Operating Lease          
    December 31,
  Balance Sheet Location 2021 2020
Right of use asset Right of use asset $2,019,745  $257,363 
Current portion of operating lease liability Current portion of operating lease liability $1,235,977   85,895 
Long-term portion of operating lease liability Long-term portion of operating lease liability $942,404  $171,468 

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, operating lease expense payments were $532,892 and $48,840, respectively, and are included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

 

Note 4 - Asset Retirement ObligationAs of December, 31, 2021, scheduled future maturities of the Company’s lease liabilities are as follows:

Schedule of operating lease liabilities    
Year Ending December 31,  
2022 $1,329,432 
2023  540,566 
2024  221,370 
2025  227,443 
2026  18,954 
Total future minimum lease payments, undiscounted  2,337,765 
Less: Amount representing interest  (159,381)
Present value of future minimum lease payments $2,178,384 
Present value of future minimum lease payments – current $1,235,977 
Present value of future minimum lease payments – long-term $942,404 

As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the weighted average lease-term and discount rate of the Company’s leases are as follows:

Weighted average lease-term and discount rate leases        
  Year ended December 31,
Other Information 2021 2020
Weighted-average remaining lease terms (in years)  2.3   2.8 
Weighted-average discount rate  6.0%  6.0%


For the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, supplemental cash flow information related to leases is as follows:

Schedule Of Cash Flow Supplemental Information        
  Year ended December 31,
Other Information 2021 2020
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of liabilities: Operating cash flows for operating leases $532,892  $16,500 
Lease liabilities related to the acquisition of right of use assets: Operating leases $2,196,370  $271,186 

 

Our asset retirement obligations relate to the abandonment of oil

Note 13 – Commitments and gas wells. The amounts recognized are based on numerous estimates and assumptions, including future retirement costs, inflation rates and credit adjusted risk-free interest rates. The following shows the changes in asset retirement obligations:

Asset retirement obligations, January 1, 2016 $3,091,478 
Liabilities incurred during the period   
Liabilities settled during the year  (2,767)
Accretion  225,480 
Asset retirement obligations, December 31, 2016 $3,314,191 
Release of liabilities  (1,814,408)
Liabilities incurred during the period   
Liabilities settled during the year   
Accretion  112,062 
Asset retirement obligations, December 31, 2017 $1,611,845 

Note 5 - Long-Term DebtContingencies

 

Senior Secured Credit Facility   Executive Appointments and Departures

Mr. Barrett Mooney

Appointment as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

 

On October 3, 2011,January 17, 2022, Mr. Barrett Mooney, the Company's Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer immediately preceding Mr. Brandon Torres Declet, was reappointed to serve as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company DD Energy, Inc., EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC(See Note 17). Mr. Mooney will continue in his role as Chairman of the Board. In his role as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Mooney will receive an annual base salary of $380,000 per year, subject to annual performance reviews and Working Interest, LLC (collectively, “Borrowers”) entered intorevisions by and at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee. In his role as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Mooney will receive an Amendedannual base salary of $380,000 per year, subject to annual performance reviews and Restated Credit Agreementrevisions by and at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee. In accordance with Texas Capital Bank,the 2022 Executive Compensation Plan, approved by the Compensation Committee, Mr. Mooney is entitled to receive an annual bonus comprised of up to 35% of his base salary in cash and other financial institutions350,000 in RSUs, based upon his performance as determined by certain metrics established by the Board and banks that may becomeMr. Mooney. In addition, Mr. Mooney is entitled to receive a partyquarterly grant of 25,000 stock options at the fair market value of the Company's Common Stock on the grant date, vesting over two years, and exercisable for a period of five years.

Effective May 5, 2020, Mr. Mooney was appointed Chairman of the Board of the Company. Prior to being recently appointed Chief Executive Officer Mr. Mooney agreed to provide the Credit AgreementCompany with consulting services, as needed, at a fixed price of $4,500 per month on a month-to-month basis, plus reimbursement for travel expenses. Commencing in August 2020, Mr. Mooney’s consulting fee increased to $10,000 per month.

Departure as Chief Executive Officer

Effective May 5, 2020, Mr. Mooney resigned as the then Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and prospectively, no longer served as senior management of the Company. In connection with his resignation, Mr. Mooney received his then current salary and benefits from timeMarch 6, 2020 through April 4, 2020. Mr. Mooney was paid $50,000 in cash, $25,000 of which was paid in a lump sum in April 2020, and the balance paid in equal installments over a six-month period, which commenced on May 5, 2020. Mr. Mooney remained eligible for up to time. The facilities provided under$15,000 bonus, as approved by the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement are to be used to refinance Borrowers prior outstanding revolving loan facility with Bank, dated July 3, 2008, and for working capital and general corporate purposes.

At our option, loans under the facility bear stated interestBoard, based on the Base Rate plus Base Rate Margin, or Floating Rate plus Floating Rate Margin (as those terms are defined in the Amendedachievement of certain revenue and Restated Credit Agreement). The Base Rate will be, for any day, a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the higher of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% and (b) the Bank’s prime rate. The Floating Rate shall mean, at Borrower’s option, a per annum interest rate equal to (i) the Eurodollar Rate plus Eurodollar Margin, or (ii) the Base Rate plus Base Rate Margin (as those terms are defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement). Eurodollar borrowings may be for one, two, three, or six months, as selected by the Borrowers. The margins for all loans are based on a pricing grid ranging from 0.00% to 0.75% for the Base Rate Margin and 2.25% to 3.00% for the Floating Rate Margin based on the Company’s Borrowing Base Utilization Percentage (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement).operational targets.

 

We entered into a First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note in the amount of $50,000,000 with Texas Capital Bank, which closed on December 15, 2011. The Amendment reflects the addition of Rantoul Partners,Mr. Torres Declet

Resignation as an additional Borrower and adds as additional security for the loans the assets held by Rantoul Partners.Chief Executive Officer

 

On August 31, 2012, we entered intoJanuary 17, 2022, the Company and Mr. Brandon Torres Declet mutually agreed to Mr. Torres Declet’s resignation as Chief Executive Officer and as a Second Amendmentdirector of the Company. In connection with his departure, and in accordance with his employment agreement with the Company, Mr. Torres Declet will receive base salary continuation equal to Amendedsix months of his then annual salary, reimbursement of COBRA health insurance premiums for a period of six months at the same rate as if Mr. Torres Declet were an active employee of the Company, and Restated Credit Agreementa grant of fully-vested restricted shares of Common Stock of the Company with Texas Capital Bank. The Second Amendment: (i) increaseda fair market value of $125,000 on the borrowingdate of termination of employment.

Appointment as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer

On May 24, 2021, Mr. Torres Declet was appointed to serve as the then new Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Torres Declet did not continue to serve as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer. On June 11, 2021, the Board upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved an increase in Mr. Torres Declet’s annual base salary from $225,000 to $7,000,000, (ii) reduced$235,000, effective as of May 24, 2021, commensurate with his new position as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Torres Declet was entitled to receive an annual 20% bonus, comprised of a mix of cash and RSUs, based upon his performance as determined by certain metrics established by the minimum interest rate to 3.75%,Board and (iii) added additional new leases as collateral for the loan.Mr. Torres Declet.

 


On November 2, 2012, we entered into a Third AmendmentApril 19, 2021, in connection with the Measure Acquisition, the Board approved the appointment of Mr. Torres Declet as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Declet also served as the President of Measure. Prior to Amendedjoining the Company, Mr. Declet, co-founded Measure, and Restated Credit Agreement with Texas Capital Bank. The Third Amendment (i) increasedsince 2014, served as its President. In his position as Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Declet received an annual base salary of $225,000 per year, subject to increases at the borrowing base to $12,150,000 and (ii) clarified certain continuing covenants and provided a limited waiver of compliance with onediscretion of the covenants so clarifiedBoard. Mr. Declet was eligible for an annual cash bonus of up to 20% of his then-current base salary, as determined by the fiscal quarterBoard in its good faith discretion, based on the achievement of a combination of personal and Company objectives. Mr. Declet was also eligible to participate in any benefit plans offered by the Company as in effect from time to time on the same basis as generally made available to other employees of the Company. Mr. Declet was awarded a one-time grant of 125,000 RSUs that vest on a pro rata basis over one year commencing on the date of closing of the Measure Acquisition. This grant had a fair value of $675,000, based on the fair value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant. For the year ended December 31, 2011.2021, the Company recognized stock-based compensation of $472,856 related to this award. Additionally, Mr. Declet was entitled to be granted, on a quarterly basis, non-qualified options to acquire 25,000 shares of Company Common Stock.

 

On January 24, 2013, we entered into a Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which was made effective as of December 31, 2012 with Texas Capital Bank.  The Fourth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) the Bank consented to the restructuring transactions related to the dissolution of Rantoul Partners, and (ii) the Bank terminated a Limited Guaranty, as defined in the Credit Agreement, executed by Rantoul Partners in favor of the BankMr. J. Michael Drozd

 

On April 16, 2013, the Bank increased our borrowing base to $19.5 million.Resignation as Chief Executive Officer

On September 30, 2013, we entered into a Fifth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Fifth Amendment reflects the following changes it: (i) expanded the principal commitment amount of the Bank to $100,000,000; (ii) increased the Borrowing Base to $38,000,000; (iii) added Black Raven Energy, Inc. to the Credit Agreement as a borrower party; (iv) added certain collateral and security interests in favor of the Bank; and (v) reduced the interest rate to 3.30%.

On November 19, 2013, we entered into a Sixth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Sixth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) the addition of Iberia Bank as a participant in our credit facility, and (ii) a technical correction to our covenant calculations.

On May 22, 2014, we entered into a Seventh Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Seventh Amendment reflects the Bank’s consent to our issuance of up to 850,000 shares of our 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock.

On August 15, 2014, we entered into an Eighth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Eighth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) the borrowing base was increased from $38 million to $40 million, and (ii) the maturity of the facility was extended by three years to October 3, 2018.

On April 29, 2015, we entered into a Ninth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. In the Ninth Amendment, the Bank (i) re-determined the Borrowing Base based upon the Reserve Report dated January 1, 2015, (ii) imposed affirmative obligations on24, 2021, the Company to use a portion of proceeds received with regard to future sales of securities or certain assets to repay the loan, (iii) consented to non-compliance by the Company with certain terms of the Credit Agreement, (iv) waived certain provisions of the Credit Agreement, and (v)Mr. J. Michael Drozd (“Mr. Drozd”) mutually agreed to certain other amendmentsMr. Drozd’s resignation as Chief Executive Officer, effective immediately (the “Termination Date”). Mr. Drozd resigned to the Credit Agreement.

On May 1, 2015, the Borrowerspursue new career opportunities. In connection with his departure, Mr. Drozd and the Banks entered into a Letter Agreement to clarify that up to $1,000,000 in proceeds from any potential future securities offering will be unencumbered by the Banks’ liens as described in the Credit Agreement through November 1, 2015, and that, until November 1, 2015, such proceeds would not be subject to certain provisions in the Credit Agreement prohibiting the Company from declaring and paying dividends that may be due and payable to holders of securities issued in such potential offerings or issued prior to the Letter Agreement.

On August 12, 2015, we entered into a Tenth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Tenth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) allow the Company to sell certain oil assets in Kansas, (ii) allow for approximately $1,300,000 of the proceeds from the sale to be reinvested in Company owned oil and gas projects and (iii) apply not less than $1,500,000 from the proceed of the sale to outstanding loan balances.

On November 13, 2015, the Company entered into an Eleventh Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Eleventh Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) waived certain provisions of the Credit Agreement, (ii) suspended certain hedging requirements, and (iii) made certain other amendments to the Credit Agreement.

On April 1, 2016, the Company informed the Bank that it would cease making the mandatory monthly borrowing base reduction payments and did not make the required April 1, 2016 payment. The Company made its mandatory quarterly interest payments on April 6, 2016 and May 2, 2016. On April 7, 2016, the Company entered into a Forbearance Agreement wherebyseparation agreement and General Release, dated June 11, 2021 (“Separation Agreement”), pursuant to which, among other things, the BankCompany agreed to not exercise remedies and rights afforded it underpaid Mr. Drozd the Amendedfollowing: (i) his regular base salary at the annual rate of $235,000 through the Termination Date; (ii) an annual performance bonus comprised of $37,130 in cash and Restated Credit Agreement118,500 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, (iii) severance pay equal to six months of his base salary as of the Termination Date; (iv) reimbursement for thirty days. The thirty day period wassix months’ of COBRA health insurance premiums at the same rate as if Mr. Drozd were an active employee of the Company; (v) cash payment equal to three days of accrued and unused vacation days; and (vi) 26,652 fully-vested RSUs with a fair value of $125,000 on the date of grant. Additionally, Mr. Drozd’s then outstanding and unvested equity awards continued to be usedgoverned by the terms of the applicable award agreements, except that 8,333 of the 100,000 RSUs granted to him on April 19, 2021, in accordance with his employment agreement with the Company, to pursue strategic alternatives.vested on the effective date of the Separation Agreement.

Appointment as Chief Executive Officer

 

On April 28, 20162020, Mr. Michael Drozd was appointed to serve as the Bank informedCompany’s then Chief Executive Officer, commencing May 18, 2020. Mr. Drozd received an annual base salary of $235,000 per year, subject to annual performance reviews and revisions by and at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Drozd was entitled to receive an annual 20% bonus, comprised of a mix of cash and stock options, based upon his performance as determined by certain metrics established by the Board and Mr. Drozd. Mr. Drozd received an initial grant of 100,000 RSUs, which were scheduled to become fully vested after one year of continued employment. Mr. Drozd was eligible to receive a quarterly award of 15,000 non-qualified stock options. At the time of issuance, each stock option award agreement was to have set forth the vesting, exercisability, and exercise price of the stock options as of the date of the grants.

Mr. Brett Chilcott

Resignation as President and Chairman of the Board

Effective May 5, 2020, Mr. Chilcott resigned as the then President and Chairman of the Board of the Company. Mr. Chilcott no longer serves as an executive or director of the Company. For a period of twelve months from his date of resignation, Mr. Chilcott agreed to remain an employee and advise the Company to ensure a seamless leadership transition. Mr. Chilcott received his then base annual salary of $140,000, plus benefits, during the twelve-month that concluded May 4, 2021.

Existing Employment and Board Agreements

On November 12, 2021, the Board, in connection 2021 executive compensation plan, approved cash bonuses of $10,000 each to Mr. Torres Declet and Ms. Fernandez-McGovern, respectively.

The Company has various employment agreements with various executive officers and directors of theCompany that serve as Board members, which it would extendconsiders normal and in the above Forbearance Agreement period to May 31, 2016 upon effectingordinary course of business.

The Company has no other formal employment agreements with our executive officers, nor any compensatory plans or arrangements resulting from the resignation, retirement, or any other termination of our named executive officers, from a principal reduction of $125,000. In addition,change-in-control, or from a change in any executive officer’s responsibilities following a change-in-control. However, it is possible that the Company will receive an automatic extensionenter into formal employment agreements with its executive officers in the future.

F-38

Founder Leak-Out Agreement

On April 7, 2020, as a condition to September 15, 2016 upon meeting certain termsthe consummation of the Series E Preferred Agreement, the Company entered into a Leak-Out Agreement with Mr. Bret Chilcott (“Mr. Chilcott”), founder, former director and conditions specified by the Bank. On May 31, 2016,President of the Company, and the Bank amended the Forbearance Agreement to extend the forbearance period to August 31, 2016. On July 29, 2016, the Company and the Bank amended the Forbearance Agreement to extend the forbearance period to October 1, 2016. 


On October 1, 2016, the Company and the Bank could not reach an agreement to extend the Third AmendmentAlpha with respect to the Forbearance Agreement. Following this outcome,shares Mr. Chilcott beneficially owns. The restriction on the disposition of the shares is for a period of seven months from the date of the closing of the agreement. Thereafter, for a period of an additional six months, Mr. Chilcott may sell no more than $25,000 per calendar month of shares of Company decided to discontinue payment of interest on its outstanding loan obligations with the Bank. The Company continued to evaluate plans to restructure, amend or refinance existing debt through private options.Common Stock.

 

On February 10, 2017,August 26, 2020, the Company, together with Mr. Chilcott and Alpha, who was a party to the other Sellers entered intoLeak Out Agreement, agreed to amend the Leak Out Agreement to change the restrictions on the disposition of Mr. Chilcott’s shares that are subject to the Leak Out Agreement (the “Amended Leak Out Agreement”). The Amended Leak Out Agreement provides that Mr. Chilcott (together with his affiliates) may sell or otherwise dispose of his shares for a period of twelve (12) months commencing on September 7, 2020 (the “Restricted Period”) in an amount representing no more than 50,000 shares per calendar month during the Restricted Period. Upon expiration of the Restricted Period, the restrictions set forth in the Amended Leak Out Agreement ceased.

Purchase Commitments

The Company routinely places orders for manufacturing services and completedmaterials. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had purchase commitments of approximately $2,240,000. These purchase commitments are expected to be realized during the year ending December 31, 2022.

Note 14 – Related Party Transactions

The following reflects the related party transactions during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively:

Ms. Fernandez-McGovern is one of the principals of Premier Financial Filings, a full-service financial printer. Premier Financial Filings provided contracted financial services to the Company. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the expenses related to services provided by Premier Financial Filings to the Company, were $33,930 and $23,524, respectively. These expenses are included within general and administrative expenses in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

One of the Company’s directors, Mr. Thomas Gardner, is one of the principals of NeuEon, Inc, which provide services to the Company as the Chief Technology Officer. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the expenses related to services provided by NeuEon Inc. to the Company were $293,750 and $118,500, respectively. These expenses are included within in the general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Following his resignation as Chief Executive Officer in May 2020, Mr. Mooney agreed to provide consulting services to the Company, as needed, at a fixed fee of $4,500 per month on a month-to-month basis, plus reimbursement for travel expenses. On July 20, 2020, the Board, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, increased Mr. Mooney’s monthly fee for consulting services to $10,000 from $4,500 per month. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized $25,000 and $66,500 of expenses, which are included in the general and administrative expenses in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Note 15 – Income Taxes

Prior to April 15, 2015, AgEagle Aerial Inc. was treated as a disregarded entity for income tax purposes. Income taxes, if any, were the responsibility of the sole member. Effective April 22, 2015, the Company elected to be classified as a corporation for income tax purposes. On March 26, 2018, the Company’s predecessor company, EnerJex Resources, Inc. (“EnerJex”), consummated the transactions contemplated by the LSA, described in greater detail in “Note 2 – Going Concern” – “Financing Transactions”.

Below is a table showing the reconciliationAgreement and Plan of the gain on LSA as set forth on the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017:

Forgiveness of existing secured loan $17,925,000 
Forgiveness of accrued interest  1,306,801 
Issuance of secured promissory note  (4,500,000)
Transfer of oil and gas properties  (1,902,726)
Transfer of gas gathering system  (1,772,588)
Transfer of shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc.  (210,990)
Transfer of ARO liability  1,814,407 
Transfer of other assets  (1,159,780)
Gain on LSA $11,500,124 

To evidence the Company’s remaining $4,500,000 of indebtedness to PWCM Investment Company IC LLC (“PWCMMerger (the “Merger Agreement”), RES Investment Group, LLC (“RES”), Round Rock Development Partners, LP (“Round Rock”), and Cibolo Holdings, LLC (“Cibolo Holdings,” and together with PWCM, RES and Round Rock, “Successor Lenders”), the Company’s subsidiaries (except Kansas Holdings, LLC) entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Cortland Capital Market Services LLC, as Administrative Agent, and the other financial institutions and banks parties thereto (the “New Credit Agreement”), and a related Amended and Restated Note (the “New Note”), in the amount of $3.3 million as described above under “Note 2 – Going Concern” – “Financing Transactions”.  

Our subsidiaries’ obligations under the credit agreement and note are non-recourse and are secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s and the subsidiaries’ oil properties and assets located in Kansas. The Company was removed as a borrower under the Credit Agreement, but entered into a Guaranty of Recourse Carveouts,dated October 19, 2017, pursuant to which the Company guarantees the Subsidiaries’ payment of certain fees and expenses due under the Credit Agreement, and may be liable for certain conduct, such as fraud, bad faith, gross negligence, and waste of the Kansas oil properties or assets.

December 22, 2017, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amendment) with Pass Creek Resources, LLC (“Pass Creek”) and Cortland Capital Market Services, LLC (“Administration Agent”). The Company, Pass Creek, and Administrative Agent are parties to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated May 10, 2017. The Maturity Date of the Loan has been extended to the earlier of (i) February 15, 2018 or April 30, 2018, if (a) the Company provides notice to the Administrative Agent of their intent to extend the maturity date and (b) no later than the first Business Day following delivery of such notice pay a $100,000 extension fee, or (ii) the merger of AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the CompanyEnerJex, merged with and into AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. pursuant to the Agreement and Plan, a then privately held company (“AgEagle Sub”), with AgEagle Sub surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merger dated as of October 19, 2017. At the closing of First Amendment, the Company paid Pass Creek a $65,000 extension fee and $7,500 to the Administrative Agent for additional fees. The Company also paid the Administrative Agent an additional $45,000 upon the filing of a definitive proxy statement by the CompanyEnerJex (the “Merger”). In connection with the SecuritiesMerger, EnerJex changed its name to AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. AgEagle Sub changed its name initially to “Eagle Aerial, Inc.” and Exchange Commission. The Company also agreedthen to borrow Improvement Advances in an amount not to exceed $300,000. The Company has extended“AgEagle Aerial, Inc.” Following the restated secured note to March 23, 2018 and has the option to extend the maturity dateMerger, AgEagle Aerial Inc. became a wholly owned subsidiary of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.

As of December 31, 2017, the principal balance of $4,457,347 along with accrued interest of $479,452 remained due under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. At December 31, 2017, the Company was not in compliance with certain covenants,AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., and the loan may be called due by Pass Creek. The note isgroup files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return as well as income tax returns in default.

As of December 31, 2017, the principal balance of $80,805 along with accrued interest of $9,616 remained due under the promissory note with Pass Creek Resources LLC. The note is in default.

On July 14, 2017, July 28, 2017 and August 30, 2017, the Company entered into Secured Promissory Notes totaling $225,000 with Alpha Capital Anstalt, which have a maturity date of June 30, 2018, and accrue interest at a rate of 8% per annum. The amount due under the notes is secured by a security interest, subordinate to certain other security interests of the Company, in substantially all of the Company's assets. The amount due under the notes is convertible into shares of the Company's common stock, at the option of Alpha Capital Anstalt, on identical terms as the outstanding Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (i.e., an initial conversion price of $0.30 per share, a 9.9% ownership limitation and certain anti-dilution rights, which currently result in a conversion price of $0.0612 per share). As of December 31, 2017, the principal balance of $225,000 remained due.

As of December 31, 2017, the principal balance of $113,750 along with accrued interest of $5,574, remained due under the promissory note with Robert Watson, the former CEO. The note is in default.

Note 6 - Commitments and Contingencies

Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was approximately $69,000 and $148,000, respectively. Future non-cancellable minimum lease payments are approximately, $10,000 for 2018.various states.

 


As of December 31, 2017,2021 and 2020, the total of all net deferred tax assets was $8,820,453 and $3,277,467, respectively. The amount of and ultimate realization of the benefits from the deferred tax assets for income tax purposes is dependent, in part, upon the tax laws in effect, the Company’s future earnings, and other future events, the effects of which cannot be determined. Because of the uncertainty surrounding the realization of the deferred tax assets the Company has an outstanding irrevocable letterestablished a valuation allowance of credit in the amount of $50,000 issued in favor of the Texas Railroad Commission. This letter of credit is required by the Commission by all companies operating in the state in accordance with limits prescribed by the Texas Railroad Commission.

We,$8,820,453 and $3,277,467 as a lessee and operator of oil and gas properties, are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to discharge of materials into, and protection of, the environment. These laws and regulations may, among other things, impose liability on the lessee under an oil and gas lease for the cost of pollution clean-up resulting from operations and subject the lessee to liability for pollution damages. In some instances, the Company may be directed to suspend or cease operations in the affected area.  As of December 31, 2017, we have no reserve for environmental remediation2021 and are not aware of any environmental claims.

On September 23, 2016, the Company, American Standard Energy Corporation, Baylor Operating LLC, Bernard Given and Loeb & Loeb LLP were sued by Geronimo Holdings Corporation and Randal Capps2020, respectively. The change in the 143rd Judicial District Court located in Pecos, Texas. The suit among other things, seeks damages for an alleged unlawful sale of properties in Crockett County Texas and for alleged unpaid royalties. The Company believes the suit is without merit and will vigorously defend itself. The Company has faith that it will prevail and at December 31, 2017 no reserve for potential losses arising from this matter has been recorded. Additionally under its agreement with Baylor Operating LLC, Baylor has agreed to indemnify and defend the Company against all lawsuits and claims including this one.

On April 26, 2016, C&F Ranch, LLC sued the Company in Allen County Kansas for alleged breach of contract related to the rental of certain lands located on the C&F Ranch. During the first quarter of 2018, the Company settled this dispute for $9,000.

Note 7 - Income Taxes

There was no current or deferred income tax expense (benefit) forvaluation allowance during the years ended December 31, 20172021 and December 31, 2016.2020 was $5,542,986 and $498,367, respectively.

 

The following table sets forth a reconciliation ofOn March 27, 2020, the provision for income taxesCARES Act was enacted in response to the statutory federal rate:

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Statutory tax rate  35.00%  35.00%
State tax rate, net of federal tax  2.01%  1.78%
Other permanent items  0.00%  0.00%
Change in valuation allowance  (37.01)%  (36.78)%
Effective tax rate  0.00%  0.00%

Significant componentsCOVID-19 pandemic. The CARES Act, among other things, provides for an acceleration of alternative minimum tax credit refunds, the deferred tax assetsdeferral of certain employer payroll taxes, the availability of an employee retention credit, and liabilities are as follows:expands the availability of net operating loss usage. In addition, other governments in state and local in which we operate have also enacted certain relief measures.

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Non-current deferred tax asset:        
Oil and gas costs and long-lived assets $4,764,420  $11,500,697 
Derivative instruments      
Net operating loss carry-forward  21,547,347   35,815,113 
Valuation allowance  (26,311,767)  (47,315,809)
Net deferred tax asset (liability) $  $ 

 

On December 22, 2017,27, 2020, the Tax Cuts and JobsConsolidations Appropriations Act, (TCJA)2021 (“CAA”) was signed into law.law and included in the government appropriations and additional economic stimulus. The TCJA, among other things, includes the reductionCAA enhances and expands certain provisions of the federalCARES Act. The CAA modifies the tax rate for corporations from 35%deductibility of expenses relating to 21%the PPP loan forgiveness, Employee Retention Credit eligibility and changes or limits certain tax deductions includingextends other CARES Act provisions. We continue to monitor new and updated legislation, however the utilizationprovisions enacted have not had a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

As of net operating losses. Under generally accepted accounting principles,December 31, 2021, the Company is required to revalue its deferred tax assetshas a federal and liabilities during the period in which the new tax legislation is enacted. The impact of TCJA resulted in a decrease in the Company's deferred tax assets in the amount of $18 million. However, there is no impact of the revaluation to the current net income because it was fully offset by the release of the valuation allowance that was previously recorded against the deferred tax asset.

At December 31, 2017, we have astate net operating loss carry forward of approximately $93 million expiring in 2021-2038 that is subject to certain limitations on an annual basis. Such limitation$39,363,972 and $16,840,478 respectively. Of those balances, the Company has not been determined, by Management. Management has determined that a 100% valuation allowance be established against$8,242,818 of federal net operating losses where it is more likely than not that suchexpiring in 2035-2037 and the remaining amounts have no expiration. The Company has a foreign net operating loss carry forwards of $1,711,418 which expire in 2028. The Company has state net operating carry forwards of $12,265,405, which expire between 2025-2041, and the remaining amounts have no expiration. As of December 31, 2020, the Company has a federal and state net operating loss carry forward of approximately $22,890,426 and $12,406,1130 respectively. Of those balances, the Company has $8,242,818 of federal net operating losses expiring in 2035-2037 and the remaining amounts have no expiration. The Company has state net operating loss carry forwards of $10,584,638 expiring in 2025-2040, and the remaining amounts have no expiration. The Act changed the rules on net operating loss carry forwards. The twenty-year limitation was eliminated for losses incurred after January 1, 2018, giving the taxpayer the ability to carry forward losses indefinitely. However, net operating loss carry forward arising after January 1, 2018, will expire or will notnow be available before they are utilized.limited to eighty percent of taxable income. 

 

The Company incurred a changetiming and manner in which we can utilize our net operating loss carry forward and future income tax deductions in any year may be limited by provisions of control as defined by the Internal Revenue Code (IRC 382). Accordingly,regarding the rules will limitchange in ownership of corporations. Such limitation may have an impact on the utilizationultimate realization of our carry forwards and future tax deductions. Section 382 of the Company’s net operating losses. The limitation is determined by multiplying the value of the stock immediately before the ownership change by the applicable long-term exempt rate. It is estimated that approximately $40.9 million ofInternal Revenue Code (“Section 382”) imposes limitations on a corporation’s ability to utilize net operating losses if it experiences an “ownership change.” In general terms, an ownership change may be subject to an annual limitation.result from transactions increasing the ownership of certain stockholders in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period. Any unused annual limitation may be carried over to later years. Theyears, and the amount of the limitation may under certain circumstances be increased by the built-in gains in assets held by the Companyus at the time of the change that are recognized in the five-year period after the change. No assurance can be made,The Company has not conducted a formal ownership change analysis as required under Section 382; however, we intend to the availability ofdo so if we anticipate recognizing tax benefits associated with the net operating losses based upon Internal Revenue Code (IRC 382), as described,loss carryforwards.

As of December 31, 2021, the Company determined it is more likely than not that it will not realize our temporary deductible differences and such amounts of net operating losses available, based uponloss carryforwards, and as such, has provided a full valuation allowance on our net deferred tax asset.

During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company did not recognize any uncertain tax positions, interest or penalty expense related to income taxes. AgEagle files U.S. federal and state income tax returns, as required by law. The federal return generally has a three-year statute of limitations, described. If there was or is other changesand most states have a four-year statute of ownership,limitations; however, the taxing authorities can review the tax year in which the net operating losses may beloss was generated when the loss is utilized on a totally unavailabletax return. We currently do not have any open income tax audits. The Company is open to offset taxablefederal and state examination on the 2018 through 2020 income. tax returns filed.

 

Internal Revenue Code (IRC 108), Income from dischargeFor the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, a reconciliation of indebtedness has rulesincome tax expense at the federal statutory rate to determine amountsincome tax expense at the Company’s effective rate is as follows:

Schedule of Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation                
  2021 2020
  Amount Rate Amount Rate
Computed tax at the expected statutory rate $(6,337,648)  21.00% $(1,035,815)  21.00%
State and local income taxes, net of federal  (249,537)  0.83%  (162,671)  3.30%
Permanent differences  1,821,323   (6.04)%  (430,179)  8.70%
Other adjustments  409,229   (1.36)%  (405,195)  (8.20)%
Return to provision adjustment  (11,518)  (0.04)%  725,102   (14.70)%
Purchase accounting  (1,298,228)  4.30%     0%
Foreign tax differential  123,393   (0.41)%     0%
Change in valuation allowance  5,542,986   (18.37)%  498,367   (10.10)%
Income tax benefit $   0.00% $   0.00%

As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the temporary differences, tax credits and carryforwards that gave rise to the following deferred tax assets (liabilities):

Schedule of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities        
  2021 2020
Property and equipment $(75,342) $4,825 
Other current liabilities  28,284   (4,601)
Intangible assets  (1,399,267)  (31,678)
Equity compensation  742,175   106,360 
Other accrued expenses  237,508   352,072
Net operating loss carry forward  8,900,739   2,850,489 
Tax credits  386,356    
Total deferred tax assets  8,820,453   3,277,467 
Valuation allowance  (8,820,453)  (3,277,467)
Net deferred tax assets $  $ 

Note 16 – Segment Information

The Company conducts the business through the following three operating and reporting segments: Drones and Custom Manufacturing, Sensors and SaaS.

The accounting policies of the operating segments are required to be included or excluded from taxable income, based upon certain circumstances. Management has determined that any dischargethe same as those described in Note 2. Non-allocated administrative and other expenses are reflected in Corporate. Corporate assets include cash, prepaid expenses, notes receivable, right of indebtedness that has occurred is included in taxable incomeuse asset and other assets.

As of December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for this period, but is reviewing such amounts, as it applied to IRC 108.the years then ended operating information about the Company’s reportable segments consisted of the following:

Schedule of consolidated results from reportable segments                    
  Corporate Drones and Custom Manufacturing Sensors SaaS Total
Year ended December 31, 2021                    
Revenue $  $2,428,858  $6,793,727  $538,367  $9,760,952 
Cost of sales     1,474,368   3,303,286   727,055   5,504,709 
Loss from operations (1)  (11,976,556)  (1,803,370)  (1,266,599)  (15,246,247)  (30,292,772)
Other income (expense), net  121,926   (16,007)  26,786   51,387   184,092 
Net loss $(11,854,630) $(1,819,377) $(1,239,813) $(15,194,860) $(30,108,680)
                     
Year ended December 31, 2020                    
Revenue $  $  $  $1,285,383  $1,285,383 
Cost of sales           711,650   711,650 
(Loss) Income Loss from operations  (5,505,040)        573,733   (4,931,307)
Other expense, net  (1,143)           (1,143)
Net loss $(5,506,183) $  $  $573,733  $(4,932,450)
                     
As of December 31, 2021                    
Goodwill $  $12,655,577  $18,972,896  $33,238,809  $64,867,282 
Assets $14,516,466  $27,073,211  $27,548,066  $37,545,298  $104,683,041 
                     
As of December 31, 2020                    
Goodwill $  $  $  $3,108,000  $3,108,000 
Assets $25,042,296  $  $  $3,684,174  $28,726,470 

(1) Includes goodwill impairment $12,357,921 for the SaaS reporting segment.

 


Note 8 - Fair Value Measurements

We hold certain financial assets which are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157,“Fair Value Measurements” (“ASC Topic 820-10”).   ASC Topic 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).  ASC Topic 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 820-10 are described below:

Level 1. Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that an entity has the ability to access.  We believe receivables, payables and our debt approximate fair value at December 31, 2017.

Level 2. Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.  We consider the derivative liability to be Level 2.  We determine the fair value of the derivative liability utilizing various inputs, including NYMEX price quotations and contract terms.

Level 3. Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. We consider the marketable securities to be a Level 3.

At December 31, 2016, our marketable securities had a value of $210,990. During 2017, as part of the LSA transaction described in “Note 2 – Going Concern” – “Financing Transactions”, we transferred the marketable securities. At December 31, 2017, we held no assets valued at Level 3. 

Note 9 - Derivative Instruments

We enter into derivative or physical arrangements with respect to portions of our crude oil production to reduce our sensitivity to volatile commodity prices and/or to meet hedging requirements under our Credit Facility.  We believe that these derivative arrangements, although not free of risk, allowed us to achieve a more predictable cash flow and to reduce exposure to commodity price fluctuations.  However, derivative arrangements limit the benefit of increases in the prices of crude oil.  Moreover, our derivative arrangements apply only to a portion of our production.

We had an Inter-creditor Agreement in place between the Company; our counterparties, BP Corporation North America, Inc. and Cargill Incorporated and our agent, Texas Capital Bank, N.A., which allows Texas Capital Bank to also act as agent for the counterparties for the purpose of holding and enforcing any liens or security interests resulting from our derivative arrangements.  Therefore, we were not required to post additional collateral, including cash.

At December 31, 2017 all derivative contracts had expired and we did not enter into any derivative contracts during 2017. 

We recorded a loss related to the mark to market of our derivative contracts for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $2,531,401. No gain or loss was recorded in 2017. 

Note 10 - Net Income Per Common Share

The Company reports earnings per share in accordance with ASC Topic 260-10,“Earnings per Share.” Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares available. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive.


Note 11 - Impairment of Oil and Gas Properties

Pursuant to full cost accounting rules, the Company must perform a ceiling test each quarter on its proved oil and natural gas assets within each separate cost center. All of the Company’s costs are included in one cost center because all of the Company’s operations are located in the United States. The Company’s ceiling test was calculated using trailing twelve-month, unweighted-average first-day-of-the-month prices for oil and natural gas as of December 31, 2017, which were based on a West Texas Intermediate oil price of $51.34 per Bbl and a Henry Hub natural gas price of $2.97 per MMBtu (adjusted for basis and quality differentials), respectively. The trailing twelve-month, unweighted-average first-day-of-the-month prices for oil and natural gas as of September 30, 2017, was based on a West Texas Intermediate oil price of $42.46 per Bbl and a Henry Hub natural gas price of $2.63 per MMBtu (adjusted for basis and quality differentials), respectively. The twelve-month, unweighted-average first-day-of-the –month price as of June 30, 2017 was $42.46 per Bbl and $2.63per MMBtu The twelve-month, unweighted-average first-day-of-the –month price as of March 31, 2017 was $45.16 per Bbl and $2.40 per MMBtu (adjusted for basis and quality differentials), respectively. Utilizing these prices, the calculated ceiling amount was greater than the net capitalized cost of oil and natural gas properties as of December 31, 2017, and as a result, no write down was recorded.    For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $8,032,670. Additional material write-downs2021, segment revenue by geographic area consisted of the Company’s oil and gas properties could occur in subsequent quarters in the event that oil and natural gas prices remain at current depressed levels, or if the Company experiences significant downward adjustments to its estimated proved reserves.following:

 

Note 12 - Other Income

The following table depicts the components of other income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

  Year ended
December 31,
2017
  Year ended
December 31,
2016
 
       
Realized gain (loss) clearing of derivative contracts $  $2,382,184 
Service Agreement with Camber Energy, Inc.  696,774    
Miscellaneous income  72   24,124 
Interest income  (3,967  32 
Other income (loss) $692,879  $2,406,340 

On April 27, 2017, the Company entered into a Services Agreement (“Service Agreement”) with Camber Energy, Inc., to perform certain outsourced interim services for $150,000 per month. Effective December 4, 2017, the Company and Camber Energy, Inc. (“Camber”), mutually agreed to terminate the agreement between the parties effective November 30, 2017.

Note 13 - Subsequent Events

On January 31, 2018, the Company extended the end date of its previously disclosed Agreement and Plan of with AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“AgEagle”) to March 31, 2018.

On February 20, 2018, the Company announced that it set the record date for the special meeting of its shareholders to, among other things, consider and vote on various proposals necessary to close the previously announced Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 19, 2017 (the “Merger Agreement”), with AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. Shareholders of record as of the close of business on February 20, 2018, will be entitled to vote at the special meeting on March 21, 2018. The Merger is subject to certain customary closing conditions and approval from our shareholders. The Merger is expected to close in the first quarter of 2018. 

As previously reported, on April 27, 2017, the Company entered into an Additional Issuance Agreement with Alpha Capital Anstalt, for the purchase of 300 restricted shares of the Company’s then newly designated Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in consideration for $300,000, with an option to purchase an additional 200 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had issued 300 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $300,000. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company had received $200,000 from Alpha Capital Anstalt to purchase an additional 200 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, which shares had not been issued as of December 31, 2017, and which are reflected as Series C Convertible Preferred Stock Issuable on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2017, in the aggregate amount of $200,000.

On February 13, 2018, the Company issued Alpha Capital Anstalt the 200,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock which it was due pursuant to the terms of the April 27, 2017, Additional Issuance Agreement, in consideration for the $200,000 paid during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Subsequent to December 31, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt converted (a) 343.671 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock into 5,610,955 shares of common stock; and (b) 103.142 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into 1,683,944 shares of common stock, pursuant to the terms of such securities.

At a special meeting of shareholders held on March 21, 2018, the Company’s shareholders approved (a) the issuance of the Company’s common stock to the shareholders of AgEagle in connection with and pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement in accordance with NYSE American Rules 712 and 713; (b) an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to amend the 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock to: (i) allow the Company to pay all accrued but unpaid dividends up to September 30, 2017 in additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock based on the value of the liquidation preference thereof, (ii) eliminate the right of the Series A Preferred Stock holders to receive any dividends accruing after September 30, 2017, (iii) convert each share of Series A Preferred Stock into 10 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment for a reverse stock split (discussed below)), and (iv) increase the number of Series A Preferred shares by 241,599 shares; (c) an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to change the name of the Company to “AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.”; (d) the adoption of the EnerJex 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); (e) the issuance of 2,248,264 shares of common stock to current officers and directors in lieu of deferred salary and fees, a majority of which will be held in escrow to secure the Company’s obligations under the Merger Agreement; (f) the conversion of the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of common stock in order to comply with the listing rules of the NYSE American; (g) the conversion of the Company’s 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock into shares of common stock in order to comply with the listing rules of the NYSE American; (h) the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock, conversion of the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock and conversion of $425,000 owed under five promissory notes held by, Alpha Capital Anstalt, of which $200,000 of the notes have previously been converted into Series C Preferred Stock as of the date of this filing, into shares of common stock in order to comply with the listing rules of the NYSE American.

The Plan provides for the grant of up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock (such number based on a post-reverse split amount) as awards which may include incentive stock options (“ISOs”), non-qualified stock options (“NQSOs”), unrestricted shares, restricted shares, restricted stock units, performance stock, performance units, SARs, tandem stock appreciation rights, distribution equivalent rights, or any combination of the foregoing, to key management employees, non-employee directors, and non-employee consultants of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (however, solely Company employees or employees of the Company’s subsidiaries are eligible for incentive stock option awards).

Additionally, the Company plans to conduct a 1-for-25 reverse stock split of the Company’s outstanding common stock, which was approved by Company shareholders on April 27, 2017, prior to the closing of the Merger, which the Company anticipates occurring prior to March 31, 2018.

 F-22

Note 14 - Supplemental Oil and Gas Reserve Information (Unaudited)

Results of operations from oil and gas producing activities

The following table shows the results of operations from the Company’s oil and gas producing activities.  Results of operations from these activities are determined using historical revenues, production costs and depreciation and depletion. The results of operations from the Company’s oil and gas producing activities below exclude non-oil and gas revenues, general and administrative expenses, interest income and interest expense. Income tax expense was determined by applying the statutory rates to pretax operating results.

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Production revenues $1,329,005  $2,461,727 
Production costs  (1,363,946)  (2,661,258)
Depletion and depreciation  (127,713)  (254,329)
Income tax  56,929   158,851 
Results of operations for producing activities $(105,725) $(295,009)

Capitalized costs

The following table summarizes the Company’s capitalized costs of oil and gas properties.

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Properties subject to amortization $10,008,764  $18,626,746 
Accumulated depletion  (8,597,539)  (15,189,716)
Net capitalized costs $1,411,225  $3,437,030 

Cost incurred in property acquisition, exploration and development activities

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Acquisition of properties $  $14,399 
Exploration costs      
Development costs     2,690 
Net capitalized costs $  $17,089 

Estimated quantities of proved reserves

Our ownership interests in estimated quantities of proved oil and gas reserves and changes in net proved reserves all of which are located in the United States are summarized below.  Proved reserves are estimated quantities of oil and gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are those that are expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Reserves are stated in barrels of oil equivalent. Geological and engineering estimates by Cobb & Associates, Inc. of proved oil and gas reserves at one point in time are highly interpretive, inherently imprecise and subject to ongoing revisions that may be substantial in amount. Although every reasonable effort is made to ensure that the reserve estimates are accurate, by their nature reserve estimates are generally less precise than other estimates presented in connection with financial statement disclosures.

    December 31, 2017      December 31, 2016   
Proved Reserves Total Proved
Developed
  Proved
Undeveloped
  Total
Proved
  Total Proved
Developed
  Proved
Undeveloped
  Total
Proved
 
                   
Beginning                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  372,140   152,610   524,750   1,287,028   202,884   1,489,912 
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  44,780      44,780   47,345      47,345 
Natural Gas MCF’s  2,686,805   3,422,165   6,108,970   3,195,895   3,029,514   6,225,409 
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  864,648   723,042   1,587,690   1,867,041   707,819   2,574,860 
                         
Revisions of previous estimates                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  (30,572)  236,390   205,818   (856,765)  (50,274)  (907,039)
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  1,870      1,870   (2,127)     (2,127)
Natural Gas MCF’s  (1,491)     (1,491)  (461,536)  392,651   (68,885)
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  (28,876)  236,390   207,514   (935,815)  15,169   (920,638)
                         
LSA Disposition                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  (242,924)     (242,924)         
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  (44,709)     (44,709)         
Natural Gas MCF’s  (2,684,865)  (3,422,165)  (6,107,030)         
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  (735,110)  (570,432)  (1,305,542)         
                         
Production                        
Crude Oil BBL’s                  
                         
Production                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  (31,834)     (31,824)  (58,123)     (58,123)
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  (1,941)     (1,941)  (528)     (528)
Natural Gas MCF’s  (449)     (449)  (47,554)     (47,554)
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  (33,851)     (33,851)  (66,578)     (66,578)
                         
Ending                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  66,810   389,000   455,810   372,140   152,610   524,750 
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s           44,780      44,780 
Natural Gas MCF’s           2,686,805   3,422,165   6,108,970 
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  66,810   389,000   455,810   864,648   723,042   1,587,690 


Estimated quantities of proved reserves

Our ownership interests in estimated quantities of proved oil and gas reserves and changes in net proved reserves all of which are located in the United States are summarized below.  Proved reserves are estimated quantities of oil and gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are those that are expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Reserves are stated in barrels of oil equivalent. Geological and engineering estimates by Cobb & Associates, Inc. of proved oil and gas reserves at one point in time are highly interpretive, inherently imprecise and subject to ongoing revisions that may be substantial in amount. Although every reasonable effort is made to ensure that the reserve estimates are accurate, by their nature reserve estimates are generally less precise than other estimates presented in connection with financial statement disclosures.

    December 31, 2017      December 31, 2016   
Proved Reserves Total Proved
Developed
  Proved
Undeveloped
  Total
Proved
  Total Proved
Developed
  Proved
Undeveloped
  Total
Proved
 
                   
Beginning                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  372,140   152,610   524,750   1,287,028   202,884   1,489,912 
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  44,780      44,780   47,345      47,345 
Natural Gas MCF’s  2,686,805   3,422,165   6,108,970   3,195,895   3,029,514   6,225,409 
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  864,648   723,042   1,587,690   1,867,041   707,819   2,574,860 
                         
Revisions of previous estimates                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  (30,572)  236,390   205,818   (856,765)  (50,274)  (907,039)
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  1,870      1,870   (2,127)     (2,127)
Natural Gas MCF’s  (1,491)     (1,491)  (461,536)  392,651   (68,885)
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  (28,876)  236,390   207,514   (935,815)  15,169   (920,638)
                         
LSA Disposition                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  (242,924)     (242,924)         
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  (44,709)     (44,709)         
Natural Gas MCF’s  (2,684,865)  (3,422,165)  (6,107,030)         
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  (735,110)  (570,432)  (1,305,542)         
                         
Production                        
Crude Oil BBL’s                  
                         
Production                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  (31,834)     (31,824)  (58,123)     (58,123)
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  (1,941)     (1,941)  (528)     (528)
Natural Gas MCF’s  (449)     (449)  (47,554)     (47,554)
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  (33,851)     (33,851)  (66,578)     (66,578)
                         
Ending                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  66,810   389,000   455,810   372,140   152,610   524,750 
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s           44,780      44,780 
Natural Gas MCF’s           2,686,805   3,422,165   6,108,970 
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  66,810   389,000   455,810   864,648   723,042   1,587,690 

Proved developed reserves at December 31, 2016 consisted of approximately 42% oil and 58% natural gas and totaled 879.8 MBOEs. Proved developed reserves for December 31, 2017 consisted of approximately 100% oil and totaled 66.8 MBOEs. Proved undeveloped reserves for December 31, 2016 were 707.8 MBOEs. Proved undeveloped reserves at December 31, 2017 were 389.0 MBOEs.

The Company annually reviews its proved undeveloped reserves to ensure an appropriate plan for development exists. The Company books proved undeveloped reserves only if it plans to convert these reserves to proved developed producing reserves within five years from the date they were first booked. At December 31, 2017 proved undeveloped reserves were approximately 389.0 MBOE’s. The Company plans to develop all the remaining locations that comprise the 389.0 MBOE of proved undeveloped reserves within five years. However, the decision to deploy capital and the timing of those expenditures is contingent on many different factors. The Company estimates capital expenditures of approximately $5.0 million will be sufficient to develop these reserves. The development plans assume a continued improvement in commodity pricing and general market conditions within the oil and gas industry.  

The calculation of proved undeveloped reserves requires the Company to make predictions regarding future acquisitions and discoveries and the impact they may have on the Company’s overall development plan of properties it currently owns. The development plan is revised to reflect changes in the oil and gas industry, including changing markets and prices, and new investment opportunities, and such revisions will result in changes to our proved undeveloped reserves. Consequently, the exact timing of capital expenditures will be heavily dependent upon the Company’s interpretation of market opportunities which are deeply influenced by projections of future commodity prices. Each year we will review our five year development plan to maximize the value of our investment in oil and gas assets and in turn maximize shareholder value. At December 31, 2017 we believe the following best characterizes our development plan.

  Estimated Conversion of
Proved Undeveloped Reserves
 
  CAPEX ($MM)  MBOE’s 
2018  648.0   77.5 
2019  965.9   93.5 
2020  1,244.8   80.7 
2021  563.8   37.5 
2022  1550.6   99.7 
Schedule of geographical revenues                
  Drones and Custom Manufacturing Sensors SaaS Total
North America $527,292  $2,235,143  $538,367  $3,300,802 
Europe, Middle East and Africa  1,074,413   2,587,399      3,661,812 
Asia Pacific  257,021   1,224,719      1,481,740 
Other     746,466   570,132   1,316,598 
  $1,858,726  $6,793,727  $1,108,499  $9,760,952 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2017 proved reserves decreased 1,131.9 MBOEs of which production accounted for 33.9 MBOEs or 3.0%2020, revenue by geographic area consisted of the decrease. The disposition of assets included infollowing:

  Drones and Custom Manufacturing Sensors SaaS Total
North America $1,218,735  $  $66,648  $1,285,383 

Note 17 – Subsequent Events

On March 31, 2022, the Loan Sale Agreement (“LSA”) transaction resulted in a 1,305.5 MBOE decrease. An offsetting increase of 207.5 MBOEs, was due primarily to decreases in commodity prices. Crude oil prices increased $0.63 or 1%. Increased commodity pricing triggered positive revisions of 139.0 MBOEs of crude oil classified as proved undeveloped. In 2017 there were no material transfers from the proved undeveloped category of 6 reservesCompany released $2,271,512 to the proved developed category.


ForMicaSense Sellers in accordance with the year ended December 31, 2016 proved reserves decreased 987.1 MBOEs of which production accounted for 66.6 MBOEs or 6.7% of the decrease. The remaining decrease of 920.6 MBOEs, was due primarily to decreases in commodity prices. Crude oil prices decreased $3.49 or 8% and natural gas prices declined 20% or $.37. Diminished commodity pricing triggered negative revisions of 898.9 MBOEs of crude oil classified as proved developed producing. Natural gas liquids decreased pricing resulted in decreases of 3.6 MBOEs to the proved developed producing category. Reduced natural gas prices also reduced amounts classified as proved developed producing by 108.6 MMCF’s. In 2016 there were no material transfers from the proved undeveloped category of 6 reserves to the proved developed category.MicaSense Purchase Agreement. (See Note 5)

 

In 2017On January 19, 2022, in accordance with the senseFly S.A. Purchase Agreement, the Company invested approximately $4,600 inissued to Parrot S.A.S. 1,927,407 restricted shares of Common Stock, having an aggregate value of $3,000,000. (See Note 5)

On January 17, 2022, the Company and Mr. Torres Declet mutually agreed to Mr. Torres Declet’s resignation as Chief Executive Officer and as a director of the Company, effective immediately. Concurrent with Mr. Torres Declet’s resignation, the Company reappointed Mr. Mooney as its oil and gas properties. These reduced expenditures were in response to extremely low commodity prices. The Company has approximately $1.0 million of current asset on hand and important infrastructure in Colorado completed which will facilitate the exploitation and development of proved undeveloped reserves over the next five years. At year endChief Executive Officer (See Note 13). Mr. Mooney continues as the Company’s reviewChairman of proved undeveloped reserves revealed challenges butthe Board.

Effective January 1, 2022, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern will receive an annual base salary of $300,000 per year, subject to annual performance reviews and revisions by and at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee. In addition, and in accordance with the 2021 Executive Compensation Plan approved by the Compensation Committee, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern is entitled to receive an annual bonus comprised of up to 35% of her base salary in cash and 300,000 in RSUs, based upon her performance, as determined by certain metrics established by the Board and Ms. Fernandez-McGovern. In addition, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern will receive a cash retention bonus of $50,000 and is entitled to receive a quarterly grant of 25,000 stock options at the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the grant date, vesting over two years, and exercisable for a period of five years.

During the period from January 1, 2022, through March 18, 2022, the Company maintains its belief that reserves will be developed within five years of their initial recording as a proved undeveloped reserve. In addition, it believes it has the financial wherewithal to develop all its proved undeveloped reserves within the five year time frames required; utilizing its balance sheet, to borrow funds as needed. Additionally, the Company believes it has the ability to joint venture any of its assets.raised approximately $4,583,000 through ATM Offering.

 

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flowsF-41

 

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows from our proved reserves for the periods presented in the financial statements is summarized below.

 

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Future production revenue $20,714,780  $30,085,550 
Future production costs  (6,669,980)  (15,278,990)
Future development costs  (4,973,120)  (4,703,230)
Future cash flows before income tax  9,071,680   10,103,330 
Future income taxes      
Future net cash flows  9,071,680   10,103,330 
10% annual discount for estimating of future cash flows  (7,603,140)  (6,666,300)
Standardized measure of discounted net cash flows $1,468,540  $3,437,030 

Changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

The following is a summary of a standardized measure of discounted net future cash flows related to the Company’s proved oil and gas reserves. The information presented is based on a calculation of estimated proved reserves using discounted cash flows based on the 12-month average price for oil and gas calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month prior period. The additions to estimated proved reserves from new discoveries and extensions could vary significantly from year to year. Additionally, the impact of changes to reflect current prices and costs of reserves proved in prior years could also be significant.

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Balance beginning of year $3,437,030  $8,769,970 
Sales, net of production costs  34,942   199,531 
Net change in pricing and production costs  16,312,304   (2,012,883)
Net change in future estimated development costs  269,890   (1,198,430)
Purchase of minerals in place      
Extensions and discoveries      
LSA Disposition  (1,902,726)   
Revisions  (17,693,233)  (4,538,173)
Accretion of discount  1,010,333   2,217,015 
Change in income tax      
Balance end of year $1,468,540  $3,437,030 

 F-25