UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172021
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _____ to _____
Commission file number 001-36353
prgo-20211231_g1.jpg
Perrigo Company plc
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
IrelandN/A
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Treasury Building, Lower Grand Canal Street, Dublin 2, Ireland-
The Sharp Building, Hogan Place, Dublin 2, Ireland D02 TY74
+353 1 7094000
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: +353 1 7094000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Ordinary shares, €0.001 par valueNew York Stock Exchange
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Ordinary shares, €0.001 par valuePRGONew York Stock Exchange
4.000% Notes due 2023PRGO23New York Stock Exchange
3.900% Notes due 2024PRGO24New York Stock Exchange
4.375% Notes due 2026PRGO26New York Stock Exchange
3.15% Notes due 2030PRGO30New York Stock Exchange
5.300% Notes due 2043PRGO43New York Stock Exchange
4.900% Notes due 2044PRGO44New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.YESYes[ ]NONo[X]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 of Section 15(d) of the Act.YESYes[ ]NONo[X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.YESYes[X]NONo[ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).YESYes[X]NONo[ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.[ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer", "smaller reporting company", and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
.
Large accelerated filerAccelerated filerNon-accelerated filerSmaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
Large accelerated filer[X]Accelerated filer[ ]Non-accelerated filer[ ]Smaller reporting company[ ]
Emerging growth company[ ]
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.[ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C.7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).YESYes[ ]NONo[X]
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing sale price of our ordinary shares on June 30, 2017July 3, 2021 as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, was $10,768,787,616.$6,266,348,414. Ordinary shares held by each director or executive officer have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
As of February 23, 2018,25, 2022, the registrant had 140,833,598133,784,716 outstanding ordinary shares.
Documents incorporated by reference:
The information called for by Part III will be incorporated by reference from the Registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A or will be included in an amendment to this Form 10-K.








PERRIGO COMPANY PLC
FORM 10-K
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20172021
TABLE OF CONTENTS


Page No.  
Part I.
Item 1.
Page No.  
Part I.
Item 1.1A.
Item 1A.1B.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Additional Item.
Part II.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Item 9C.
Part III.
Part III.
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Part IV.
Item 15.









CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


Certain statements in this report are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are subject to the safe harbor created thereby. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our, or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. In particular, statements about our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions, future events or future performance contained in this report, including certain statements contained in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” are forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” "forecast," “predict,” “potential” or the negative of those terms or other comparable terminology.


We haveThe Company has based these forward-looking statements on ourits current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections. While we believethe Company believes these expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections are reasonable, such forward-looking statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond ourthe Company’s control, including: the timing, amounteffect of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and costits variants and the associated supply chain impacts on the Company’s business; general economic, credit, and market conditions; the outbreak of any share repurchases;war between Russian and Ukraine, including the imposition of sanctions related thereto, or escalation of conflict in other regions where we do business; future impairment charges; the success of management transition; customer acceptance of new products; competition from other industry participants, some of whom have greater marketing resources or larger market shares in certain product categories than we do;the Company does; pricing pressures from customers and consumers; resolution of uncertain tax positions, including the Company’s appeal of the draft and final Notices of Proposed Assessment (“NOPAs”) issued by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and the impact that an adverse result in any such proceedings would have on operating results, cash flows, and liquidity; pending and potential third-party claims and litigation, including litigation relating to ourthe Company’s restatement of previously-filed financial information;information and litigation relating to uncertain tax positions, including the NOPAs; potential impacts of ongoing or future government investigations and regulatory initiatives; resolutionpotential costs and reputational impact of uncertain tax positions;product recalls or sales halts; the impact of U.S. tax reform legislation and healthcare policy; general economic conditions;the timing, amount and cost of any share repurchases; fluctuations in currency exchange rates and interest rates; the Company’s ability to achieve the benefits expected from the sale of its RX business and the risk that potential costs or liabilities incurred or retained in connection with that transaction may exceed the Company’s estimates or adversely affect the Company’s business or operations; the consummation and success of the proposed acquisition of Héra SAS and the ability to achieve the expected benefits thereof, including the risk that the parties fail to obtain the required regulatory approvals or to fulfill the other conditions to closing on the expected timeframe or at all, the occurrence of any other event, change or circumstance that could delay the transaction or result in the termination of the securities sale agreement or the risks that the Company’s synergy estimates are inaccurate or that the Company faces higher than anticipated integration or other costs in connection with the proposed acquisition; the consummation and success of other announced and unannounced acquisitions or dispositions, and the success of such transactions, and ourCompany’s ability to realize the desired benefits thereof; and ourthe Company’s ability to execute and achieve the desired benefits of announced cost-reduction efforts and strategic and other initiatives. In addition, we may be unableAn adverse result with respect to remediate onethe Company’s appeal of any material outstanding tax assessments or more previously identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. Furthermore, we may incur additional tax liabilities in respectpending litigation, including securities or drug pricing matters, could ultimately require the use of 2016corporate assets to pay such assessments, damages from third-party claims, and prior years related interest and/or be found to have breached certain provisionspenalties, and any such use of Irish company law in connection with our restatement of our previously filed financial statements, which may result in additional expenses and penalties.corporate assets would limit the assets available for other corporate purposes. These and other important factors, including those discussed in this report under “Risk Factors” and in any subsequent filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements in this report are made only as of the date hereof, and unless otherwise required by applicable securities laws, we disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.


TRADEMARKS, TRADE NAMES AND SERVICE MARKS


This report contains trademarks, trade names and service marks that are the property of Perrigo Company plc, as well as, for informational purposes, trademarks, trade names, and service marks that are the property of other organizations. Solely for convenience, certain trademarks, trade names, and service marks referred to in this report appear without the ®,™ and SM symbols, but those references are not intended to indicate that we or the applicable owner, as the case may be, will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our or their rights to such trademarks, trade names, and service marks.

1
NOTE REGARDING FISCAL YEAR

Our fiscal year previously consisted of a 52- or 53-week year ending on or around June 30 of each year with each quarter ending on the Saturday closest to each calendar quarter end. Beginning on January 1, 2016, we changed our fiscal year to begin on January 1 and end on December 31 of each year. As a result of our change in year end, this report on Form 10-K discloses the results of our operations for the twelve-month periods from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016. The six months ended December 31, 2015 reflects our financial results from June 28, 2015 through December 31, 2015. The year ended June 27, 2015 reflects our financial results for the twelve-month period from June 29, 2014 to June 27, 2015.


We cut off our quarterly accounting periods on the Saturday closest to the end of the calendar quarter, with the fourth quarter ending on December 31 of each year.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Business Overview



PART I.


ITEM 1.BUSINESS

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

Perrigo Company plc was incorporated under the laws of Ireland on June 28, 2013. We became the successor registrant to Perrigo Company, a Michigan corporation, on December 18, 2013 in connection with the acquisition of Elan Corporation, plc ("Elan"). Unless the context requires otherwise, the terms "Perrigo", the "Company", "we," "our," "us," and similar pronouns used herein refer to Perrigo Company plc, its subsidiaries, and all predecessors of Perrigo Company plc and its subsidiaries.


WHO WE ARE


We are a leading global healthcare company, delivering value Our vision is to our customers and consumersmake lives better by providingbringing Quality, Affordable HealthcareSelf-Care Products®. Founded in 1887 as a packager of home remedies, we have built a unique business model that is best described as the convergence of a fast-moving consumer goods company, a high-quality pharmaceutical manufacturing organization and a world-class supply chain network. We believe weconsumers trust everywhere they are one of the world's largest manufacturers of over-the-counter (“OTC”) healthcare products and suppliers of infant formulas for the store brand market.sold. We are a leading provider of branded OTC products throughout Europe,over-the-counter ("OTC") health and also a leading producer of generic pharmaceutical topical products such as creams, lotions,wellness solutions that are designed to enhance individual well-being and gels, as well as nasal sprays and injection ("extended topical") prescription drugs.empower consumers to proactively prevent or treat conditions that can be self-managed. We are headquartered in Ireland and sell our products primarily in North America and Europe as well as in other markets including Australia, Israelaround the world.

We endeavor to empower consumers’ self-care decisions, utilizing the Company’s core competencies to fully take advantage of the massive global trend towards self-care. We define self-care as not just treating disease or helping individuals feel better after taking a product, but also maintaining and China.


MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS IN OUR BUSINESS

Restructuring

On February 21, 2017, we approvedenhancing their overall health and wellness. Consistent with our vision, in 2019 Perrigo’s management and board of directors launched a workforce reduction plan as partthree-year strategy to transform the Company into a consumer self-care leader. We completed our transformation to a consumer self-care company in 2021 by reconfiguring the portfolio through the divestiture of our RX business, announcement of the acquisition of Héra SAS (“HRA Pharma”), and removal of significant uncertainty through settlement of a larger cost optimization strategy across the Company, which was completed during the year. Our plan was to reduce our global workforce by approximately 750 employees, which included some actions already taken and 235 employees who had elected to participate in a voluntary early retirement program. This represented a reduction of approximately 14% of our global non-production workforce. The changes to our workforce varied by country, based on legal requirements and required consultations with works councils and other employee representatives, as appropriate. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we recognized $61.0 million of restructuring expenses (refer to Item 8. Note 18).tax exposure. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2017, we executed a supply chain reorganization which continuescontinue to generate savings for both our North Americaninvest in growth initiatives to drive future consistent and International segments.sustainable results in line with consumer-packaged goods peers.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Business Overview



Segments


Our reporting and operating segments are as follows:


Consumer HealthcareSelf-Care Americas ("CHCA" ("CSCA"), comprises our consumer self-care business (OTC, infant formula, and Oral care categories, our divested Animal health category, and contract manufacturing) in the U.S., Mexico and Canada consumer healthcare business (OTC, contract, infant formula and animal health categories).
Canada.
Consumer HealthcareSelf-Care International("CHCI" ("CSCI"),comprises our branded consumer healthcareself-care business primarily branded in Europe and Australia, and our consumer focused businessesstore brand business in the U.K., Australia,United Kingdom and Israel. This segment also includes our U.K.parts of Europe and Asia. Our liquid licensed products business.
business in the United Kingdom was divested on June 19, 2020.

Prescription Pharmaceuticals("We previously had an RX"),comprises segment which was comprised of our prescription pharmaceuticals business in the U.S. Prescription Pharmaceuticals business.
We also had two legacy operating segments, Specialty Sciences and Other,other pharmaceuticals and diagnostic businesses in Israel, which contained our Tysabri® financial asset and Active Pharmaceuticals business ("API") businesses, respectively, which we divested (refer to Item 8. Note 2 and Note 6).have been divested. Following these divestitures,the divestiture, there were no substantial assets or operations left in either of these segments. Effective January 1, 2017,this segment. The RX segment was reported as Discontinued Operations in 2021, and is presented as such for all expenses associated with our former Specialty Sciences segment were movedperiods in this report (refer to unallocated expenses.Item 8.Note8). Financial information related to our business segments and geographic locations can be found in Item 8. Note 1921. Our segments reflect the way in which our management makes operating decisions, allocates resources and manages the growth and profitability of the Company.


Omega Acquisition
2

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1

Business Overview

MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS IN OUR BUSINESS

Sale of Generic RX Pharmaceuticals Business

On March 30, 2015,1, 2021, we acquired Omegaannounced a definitive agreement to sell our RX business to Altaris Capital Partners, LLC ("Altaris"). On July 6, 2021, we completed the sale of the RX business for aggregate consideration of $1.55 billion, subject to customary adjustments for cash, debt, working capital and certain transaction expenses. The consideration includes approximately $53.3 million of reimbursements which Altaris will be required to deliver in cash to Perrigo pursuant to the terms of the Agreement. The sale resulted in a pre-tax gain, net of professional fees, of $47.5 million recorded in Other (income) expense, net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations for discontinued operations. The gain included a $159.3 million increase from the write-off of foreign currency translation adjustment from Accumulated other comprehensive income. The sale of the RX business helped establish Perrigo as a pure-play consumer self-care company, and was an essential milestone in our transformation plan.

HRA Pharma Invest N.V. ("Omega"Acquisition Agreement

On September 8, 2021, we and our wholly-owned subsidiary Habsont Unlimited Company (the "Purchaser"), entered into a Put Option Agreement to acquire certain holding companies holding all of the outstanding equity interests of HRA Pharma from funds affiliated with private equity firms Astorg and Goldman Sachs Asset Management (collectively, the "Sellers"). Pursuant to the Put Option Agreement, following completion of the works council consultation process required under French law, the selling shareholders exercised their put option right under the Put Option Agreement and, on October 20, 2021, the Company, the Purchaser and the Sellers entered into a Securities Sale Agreement in the form previously agreed by the parties (the “Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement, the Purchaser has agreed to acquire certain holding companies holding all of the outstanding equity interests of HRA Pharma from the Sellers for cash. The transaction values HRA Pharma at approximately €1.8 billion, or approximately $2.1 billion based on exchange rates as of the date of the Put Option Agreement, on an enterprise value basis and using a lockbox mechanism set forth in the Purchase Agreement. In September 2021, we entered into two non-designated currency option contracts to hedge the foreign currency exposure of the euro-denominated purchase price for HRA Pharma (refer to Item 8. Note 11).

The proposed final transaction is expected to close in the first half of 2022, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals. We intend to pay the purchase price using a combination of cash on hand and, depending upon market conditions, either funds available under our current credit facility or funds from new debt financing. HRA Pharma is one of the largestfastest growing OTC companies globally, with three category-leading self-care brands in blister care (Compeed®), women’s health (ellaOne®) and scar care (Mederma®), and brings expertise in prescription-to-OTC switches. This acquisition is expected to strengthen our presence in Europe, for $3.0 billionimprove our financial profile and margins, and build on our transformation to a consumer self-care company. Operating results are expected to be reported within both our CSCA and CSCI segments.

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic

We have been impacted by the coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic and the responses by government entities to combat the virus. We currently continue to operate in equityall our jurisdictions and cashare complying with the rules and assumed debt of $1.6 billion,guidelines prescribed in each jurisdiction. Refer to Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Executive Overview for a total purchase pricedetailed discussion of $4.6 billion. The Omega acquisition expandedthe impact of the COVID-19 pandemic to our OTC leadership position into continental Europe, accelerated our international expansion and geographic diversification through enhanced scale and a broader footprint, and diversified our net sales and cash flow streams.business.


The broader European platform established throughTribunal Ruling in Claim Arising from the Omega acquisition, facilitatedAcquisition

As previously disclosed, we were involved in arbitration in Belgium related to our claims of fraud in connection with the acquisition of a portfolio of well-established OTC brands sold primarilyOmega acquisition. The Tribunal panel, as described in Europemore detail under Claim Arising from GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare (“GSK”), on August 28, 2015 and Naturwohl Pharma, GmbH ("Naturwohl"), with its leading German dietary supplement brand, Yokebe®,on September 15, 2015 (refer to the Omega Acquisition in Item 8. Note 219, found fraud by the sellers of Omega in a ruling on August 27, 2021 and awarded Perrigo approximately €355.0 million ($417.6 million at the time of cash receipt) including fees and costs. The panel also ruled against the sellers and in favor of Perrigo on all the counterclaims. The sellers have paid all amounts owed under the award, and the arbitral proceedings have now ended. The arbitration proceedings remain confidential as required by the Share Purchase Agreement dated November 6, 2014 ("SPA") and the rules of Belgian Centre for Arbitration and Mediation ("CEPANI"). Subsequently,We recorded the cash receipt as a reduction to Operating Expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

3

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Business Overview

Tax Updates

As described in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis – Recent Developments, Item 1A. Risk Factors - Tax Related Risks, and Item 8. Note 17, we are engaged in tax disputes in several jurisdictions. The following update notes certain material developments in such disputes since December 31, 2020, and makes use of certain terms defined in Item 8. Note 17.

IRS Audit (2013-2015 Tax Years). On January 13, 2021, the IRS issued a 30-day letter proposing, among other modifications, certain transfer pricing adjustments regarding our profits from the distribution of omeprazole during our 2013 to 2015 tax years in the aggregate amount of $141.6 million. We timely filed a protest on February 26, 2021, on the grounds that certain of the government’s positions are currently the subject of pending litigation in the Western District of Michigan with respect to refund requests relating to our 2009 through 2012 tax years. We believe that we should prevail on the merits on the issues being contested. However, we have reserved for taxes and interest payable on a 5.24% deemed royalty on omeprazole, which we have conceded, through the tax year ended December 31, 2018.

In addition, the 30-day letter for the 2013-2015 tax years expanded on a Notice of Proposed Adjustment ("NOPA") issued on December 11, 2019 and proposed to disallow adjustments to gross sales income on the sale of prescription products to wholesalers for accrued wholesale customer pipeline chargebacks where the prescription products were not re-sold by such wholesalers to covered retailers by the end of the tax year for the 2013-2015 tax years. We filed a protest on February 26, 2021 to request IRS Appeals consideration. On January 20, 2022, the IRS responded to our Protest with its Rebuttal and reiterated its position in the NOPA that the accrued chargebacks are not currently deductible in the tax year accrued because all events have not occurred to establish the fact of the liability in the year deducted. If the IRS were to prevail in its proposed adjustment, we estimate a payment of approximately $18.0 million, excluding interest and penalties for the 2013-2015 tax years. In addition, we expect the IRS to seek similar adjustments for future years. If those future adjustments were to be sustained, based on preliminary calculations and subject to further analysis, we estimate this would result in a payment not to exceed $7.0 million through tax year ended December 31, 2021, excluding interest and penalties. We have fully reserved for this issue. We strongly disagree with the IRS’s proposed adjustment and will pursue all available administrative and judicial remedies necessary.

IRS NOPA (Interest Deductibility for 2014-2015 Tax Years). On January 13, 2021, we received a Revenue Agent Report (“RAR”) for our 2013-2015 tax years, which retains the adjustment from the previously disclosed NOPA dated May 7, 2020, which disallowed interest expense deductions of $414.7 million on $7.5 billion in debts owed by Perrigo U.S. to Perrigo Company plc for the 2014 and 2015 tax years. We timely filed a protest to the RAR with the IRS. The RAR caps the interest rate on the debt for U.S. federal income tax purposes at 130.0% of the Applicable Federal Rate on the stated grounds that the loans were not negotiated on an arm's-length basis. The IRS advised on May 3, 2021, that it changed its policy for all taxpayers and will no longer pursue the default interest of 130.0% of AFR. However, on January 20, 2022, the IRS responded to our Protest, which we filed on February 26, 2021, with its Rebuttal, and revised its position on this interest rate issue by reasserting that implicit parental support considerations are necessary to determine the arm's length interest rate and proposed revised interest rates that are higher than the interest rates proposed under its 130% of AFR assertion. The blended interest rate proposed by the IRS Rebuttal is 4.36%, an increase from the blended interest rate in the RAR of 2.57%, and lower than the stated blended interest rate of the loans of 6.8%. We will pursue all available administrative and judicial remedies necessary to defend the deductibility of the interest expense on this indebtedness.

Irish Revenue NoA. On November 4, 2020, the Irish High Court ruled that the NoA did not violate our constitutional rights and legitimate expectations as a taxpayer. The Irish High Court did not review the technical merits of the NoA under Irish law. Elan Pharma pursued further challenges in the Irish Tax Appeals Commission, which scheduled a hearing for late 2021. Prior to the scheduled hearing, on September 29, 2021, Elan Pharma and Irish Revenue agreed to a full and final settlement of the NoA on the following terms: (i) on a 'without prejudice basis' and, for purposes of the settlement, an alternative basis of taxation was applied, (ii) Irish Revenue to take no further action in relation to the NoA or any Tysabri related income or transactions, (iii) no interest or penalties applied, (iv) a total tax of €297.0 million charged as full and final settlement of all liabilities arising from the sale of the Tysabri patents for the fiscal years 2013 to 2021, and (v) after Irish Revenue credited taxes already paid and certain unused R&D credits against the €297.0 million charged settlement amount, the total cash payment of €266.1 million ($307.5 million) was made on
4

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Business Overview

October 5, 2021. We recorded the payment as a component of income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Israeli Notice of Assessment. On December 29, 2020, we received a Stage A assessment from the Israeli Tax Authority ("ITA") for the tax years ended December 31, 2015 through December 31, 2017 in the amount of $63.8 million relating to attribution of intangible income to Israel, income qualifying for a lower preferential rate of tax, exemption from capital gains tax, and deduction of certain settlement payments. We timely filed our protest on March 11, 2021 to move the matter to Stage B of the assessment process. Through negotiations with the ITA, we resolved the audit for the tax year ended June 27, 2015 through tax year ended December 31, 2019, by agreeing to add tax year ended December 31, 2018 and tax year ended December 31, 2019 to the audit to reach an agreeable resolution to provide certainty for these additional periods. The agreement with the ITA required us to pay $19.0 million, after offset of refunds of $17.2 million, for the five taxable years. In addition, we paid $12.5 million to resolve a tax liability indemnity for the tax year ended December 31, 2017 relating to Perrigo API Ltd, which we disposed of in December 2017. We recorded the payments as a component of income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

IRS NOPA (Athena IPR&D Royalty Rate). Without prejudice to pursuing other administrative and judicial remedies, on April 21 and 23, 2020, we filed requests for Competent Authority Assistance with the IRS and Irish Revenue to alleviate potential double taxation on Tysabri income for the 2011-2013 tax years followed by a supplemental request on October 20, 2020 related to a disputed litigation expense deduction involving the drug Zonegran. Both requests were accepted and are under review by the Competent Authorities of the United States and Ireland.

IRS Audit (Omeprazole Transfer Pricing Adjustments in 2009-2012 Tax Years). A trial was held during the period May 25, 2021 to June 7, 2021 for the refund case in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan. Post-trial briefings were completed on September 24, 2021 and the case is now fully submitted for the court’s decision.

Securities Litigation Settlement

A settlement was reached in the case, In re Perrigo Company plc Securities Litigation as described in more detail in Item 8. Note 19 under the header In the United States (cases related to Irish Tax events). Motion papers seeking approval of the class action settlement were filed on October 4, 2021. The Court issued a preliminary approval order on October 29, 2021, which led to notices being sent to class members. The Court held a hearing on February 16, 2022 about the settlement and issued the Final Approval Order and Judgment. As a result, the settlement has been approved and the case has now ended. The settlement has been funded by insurance.

Share Repurchases

We did not purchase any shares during the year ended December 31, 2016,2021.

Stock Exchange Listing

On November 22, 2021, we identified impairment indicators associated with certain intangible assets and goodwill, which required usinitiated steps to test these assets for impairment. As a result, we recorded total impairmentsvoluntarily delist our ordinary shares from trading on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (“TASE”). The delisting of $2.0 billion (refer to Item 8. Note 3).

Elan Acquisition

On December 18, 2013, we acquired Elan in a cash and stock transaction totaling $9.5 billion. The acquisition ledour ordinary shares took effect on February 23, 2022, three months following the date of our request to the creationTASE pursuant to Israeli law. Our ordinary shares will continue to be listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), and all ordinary shares that were traded on TASE were transferred to the NYSE where they continue to be traded.

Leadership Changes

Effective October 5, 2021, Jim Dillard was named Executive Vice President ("EVP") and President of our then new corporate structure headquartered in Dublin, Ireland. We have utilizedCSCA segment. Mr. Dillard's supply chain, manufacturing, R&D, innovation, and regulatory experience, along with his proven leadership skills, make him qualified to lead this structure to continue to grow in our core marketssegment. Before this role, Mr. Dillard served as Perrigo's EVP and further expand outside of the U.S. The acquisition also provided us with the Tysabri® financial asset.Chief Scientific Officer.

In November 2016, we initiated a strategic review of the Tysabri® financial asset. During this review, we identified impairment indicators of the fair value of that royalty stream, which led to a goodwill impairment recorded during the year ended December 31, 2016 (refer to Item 8. Note 3 and Note 6 for additional information on the impairment and fair value adjustments, respectively). On March 27, 2017, we announced the completed divestment of the Tysabri® financial asset to Royalty Pharma for up to $2.85 billion, consisting of $2.2 billion in cash and up to $250.0 million and $400.0 million in royalties earned if global net sales of Tysabri® meet specific thresholds in 2018 and 2020, respectively. As a result of this transaction, we transferred the entire financial asset to Royalty Pharma and recorded a $17.1 million gain during the three months ended April 1, 2017 (refer to Item 8. Note 6 for additional information on the Royalty Pharma contingent milestone payments).

Divestitures

In addition to the above mentioned Tysabri® financial asset disposal, as a result of our continued efforts to implement certain initiatives, streamline our organization and review our portfolio, during the year ended December 31, 2017, we divested the following (refer to Item 8. Note 2):
5

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Business Overview




Certain Abbreviated New Drug Applications ("ANDAs") for $15.0 million in proceeds.
Our animal health pet treats plant fixed assets for $7.7 million in proceeds.
Our India API business for $22.2 million in proceeds.
Our Russian business for €12.7 million ($15.1 million) in proceeds.
Our Israel API business for $110.0 million in proceeds.

NEW PRODUCTS


We consider a product to be new if it (i) was (i) reformulated, (ii) involvedwas a product line extension due to changes in characteristics such as strength, flavor, or color, (iii) involvedhad a change in product status from "prescription only" ("Rx") to OTC, (iv) was a new genericstore brand or branded launch, (v) was provided in a new dosage form or (vi) was sold to a new geographic area with different regulatory authorities, in all cases, within 12 months prior to the end of the period for which net sales are being measured. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, new product sales were $209.7$130.0 million.


CONSUMER HEALTHCARESELF-CARE AMERICAS


Overview


The CHCACSCA segment is focused primarily on the sale of OTC store brandself-care products that help to grow our customers' overall self-care portfolio in categories including cough, cold, allergyUpper respiratory, Pain and sinus, analgesic, gastrointestinal, smoking cessation, infant formulasleep-aids, Digestive health, Nutrition, Vitamins, minerals and food, animal health,supplements ("VMS"), Healthy lifestyle, Skincare and diagnostic productspersonal hygiene, and Oral care in the U.S., Mexico, Canada, and Canada.South America. We are a leading provider of consumer healthcareself-care products sold to consumers via store brands and also sell consumer healthcare products under our own brands. Consumer awareness and knowledge of the quality, value and value that OTC store brandefficacy of our products represent continues to grow due to retailer efforts to promotemade by our retailers and wholesalers. We provide our customers self-care products under both their own label programs.brands and our brands, which are sold to consumers in store at shelf, store pickup and online. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, our CHCACSCA segment represented approximately 49%65% of consolidated net sales.


The CHCACSCA segment develops, manufactures, and markets store brand self-care products that are comparable in quality and effectiveness to national brands. Store brand products must meet the same stringent U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") requirements as national brands within the U.S. and the requirements of comparable regulatory bodies outside the U.S. In most instances, our product packaging is designed to invite and reinforce comparison to national brand products, while communicating store brand value to consumers.


The cost of store brand and our branded products to retailers is significantly lower than that of comparable nationally advertised brand-namebrand name products. Generally, retailers’ dollar profit per unit of store brand product is greater than the dollar profit per unit of the comparable national brand product. The retailer, therefore, can price a store brand product below the competing national brand product and realize a greater profit margin. The consumer benefits by receiving a high qualityhigh-quality product at a price below the comparable national brand product. As a result, our business model results in consumers saving money on their healthcare spending.self-care needs.
    
We are dedicated to continuing to be the leader in developing and marketing new OTC store brand and our branded products including infant formula, and have a research and development ("R&D") staff that we believe is one of the most experienced in the industry at developing products comparable in formulation and quality to national brand products. In order to offer consumers product features or benefits that national brand companies do not offer, we have implemented a product development strategy to differentiate store brand and our branded products from national brands. Our R&D team also responds to changes in existing national brand products by reformulating existing products. For example, in the OTC pharmaceutical market, certain new products are the result of changes in product status from Rx to OTC.Rx-to-OTC. These “Rx-to-OTC switches” require FDA approval through a process initiated by the drug innovator. The drug innovator usually begins the process by filing a New Drug Application ("NDA"), which is often followed by a competitor filing an ANDA.Abbreviated New Drug Application ("ANDA"). Global regulatory agencies highly scrutinize any product application submitted to switch a product from physician prescribed Rx to OTC. New drugs are also marketed through the FDA's OTC monograph process, which allows for the production ofus to produce drugs that are generally recognized as safe and effective without pre-marketing approval.

The CHCA segment In the Oral care category, we focus on creating products that are equivalent to the national brands, and also develops, manufactures, and distributes certain branded products when the strategy is synergisticpartner with our store brand business. Branded products include the Good Sense®, Sergeant's®, Sentry®, Zephrex D®, PetArmor®,customers to create exclusive brands and ScarAway® brand names.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
CHCA


We manufacture a significant portion of our CHCA segment's products at our plants in the U.S., Mexico, and Israel, and we source our remaining needs from third parties.differentiated products. We rely on both internal R&D and strategic product development agreements with outside sources to develop new products.

The CSCA segment also develops, manufactures, and distributes certain branded products, which are consistent with the segment's self-care strategy. Our branded products sold under brand names include Prevacid®24HR,Good Sense®, Zephrex D®, ScarAway®, Plackers®, Rembrandt®, Steripod®, Firefly®, REACH®, Dr. Fresh® , and Burt's Bees®.

We manufacture a significant portion of our CSCA segment's products at our plants located in the U.S., Mexico, and China, and we source the remaining materials and products from third parties. In addition, in order to
6

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
CSCA
maximize both our capacity and sales of proprietary formulas, we engage in contract manufacturing, which involves producing unique ANDAs and monographproducts through partnerships with major pharmaceutical and direct-to-consumer companies.


We believe the increasing age of the global population, continued rising healthcare costs, and consumers who proactively prevent or treat conditions will drive the need for the greaterenhanced value that our products provide to consumers, which creates strong dynamics for U.S. OTC market growth. Another level of growth includes share gains against store brand products provide consumers.competitors and store brand penetration gains versus national brands. In addition, we believe that new products, including new product innovation and products switching from Rx to OTCRx-to-OTC status (as described above) will continue to drive demand for our products and market growth within the segment.


Recent Trends and Developments

During the third quarter of 2021, supply chain disruptions, including a significant shortage of truck drivers in the U.S. and record delays at global shipping ports, led to higher unfulfilled customer orders and higher input costs compared to the prior year. In the fourth quarter of 2021, we took a series of actions to improve the situation, including reconfiguring our distribution system for short term shipments, outsourcing highly complex product lines to a third party logistic provider, adding regional carriers for challenged shipping lanes, hiring additional distribution center personnel, and increasing the purchase cycle as it relates to the manufacturing process. While we believe supply chain disruptions will continue in the near-term, we are expecting to continue to see improvements throughout 2022.

During the first half of 2021, net sales of cough and cold products decreased as a result of the very low incidence of cough and cold related illness, which we believe is attributed to social distancing and mask mandates put in place to combat the spread of COVID-19. However, increased consumer takeaway at our retail customers, starting in May 2021, suggested normalizing consumer purchasing routines could be expected in the second half of 2021. In the third quarter, we experienced higher demand for cough, cold and pain products due primarily to the higher incidences of cough and cold illness as society returned to in-person activities. Consumer take away continued to remain strong during the fourth quarter and, as such, we expect sales of cough, cold and pain products to continue to increase, depending on the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic moving forward (refer to Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Executive Overview).

On May 18, 2021, we announced a definitive agreement to sell our Latin American businesses to Advent International. This transaction is part of our margin improvement program and Project Momentum cost savings initiative and is expected to close in the first half of 2022. We determined that the carrying value of these businesses exceeded their fair value less cost to sell, resulting in an impairment charge of $162.2 million allocated to goodwill and assets held for sale (refer to Item 8. Note 9).

7

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
CSCA
Products


Our CHCACSCA segment offers products in the following categories:

Product CategoryDescription
AnalgesicsPain and sleep-aidsPainProducts comprised of pain relievers, and fever reducers and sleep-aids.
Cough/cold/allergy/sinusUpper respiratoryCough, cold,Products that relieve upper respiratory symptoms, including cough suppressants, expectorants, sinus and allergy and sinus productsrelief.
GastrointestinalDigestive healthAntacids,Products such as antacids, anti-diarrheal, and anti-heartburn productsthat relieve symptoms associated with digestive issues.
NutritionInfant nutritionalsInfant formulaformulas and food productsnutritional beverages.
SmokingHealthy lifestyleProducts that help consumers live a healthy lifestyle such as smoking cessation, diabetes care, and well-being products.
Skincare and personal hygieneGums, lozenges,Products for the face and body such as dermatological care, scar management, lice treatment, and other products designed to help users quit smokingfor various skin conditions.
Animal healthOral carePet healthProducts used for oral care, including toothbrushes, toothbrush replacement heads, floss, flossers, whitening products and wellness productstoothbrush covers.
OtherVitamins, minerals, and supplementsFeminine hygiene, diabetes care, dermatological care, diagnosticVitamins, minerals, and supplements.
OtherDiagnostic products scar management, and other miscellaneous healthcare productsself-care products.


The chart below reflects net sales by product category in the CHCACSCA segment, which includes net sales from our OTC contract manufacturing business for the year ended December 31, 2017.2021.
    prgo-20211231_g2.jpg
Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
CHCA


We launched a number ofseveral new CHCACSCA products in the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, most notably esomeprazole magnesium (storea store brand equivalent to Nexium® 24HR capsules)hypoallergenic infant formula,Diclofenac sodium topical gel 1%, and smoking cessation products.Esomeprazole Mini. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, new product sales in the CHCACSCA segment were $68.7$56.1 million.


We, on our own or in conjunction with partners, received final FDA approval from U.S. health authorities for twoone new productsproduct within the CHCACSCA segment in the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, and as of December 31, 2017,2021, we had eight new product applications pending FDA approval.


8

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
CSCA
Sales and Marketing

Our customers include major global, national, and regional retail drug, supermarket, and mass merchandise chains such as Walmart, Costco, CVS, Target, Walgreens Boots Alliance, Rite Aid, Kroger, Target, Dollar General, Sam’s Club, Costco, Petco, Petsmart, Aldi,Topco, Padagis e-commerce stores including Amazon, and major wholesalers, including McKesson, Amerisource Bergen, and Cardinal Health, and Amerisource Bergen.Health.


We seek to establish customer loyalty through superior customer service by providing a comprehensive assortment of high quality, value-pricedaffordable products; timely processing, shipment and delivery of orders; assistance in managing customer inventories; and support in managing and building the customer’s self-care market portfolio including their store brand business.business, trade and digital marketing activities. The CHCACSCA segment employs its own sales force to service larger customers and uses industry brokers for other retailers.customers. Field sales employees, with support from marketing and customer service team members, are assigned to specific customers in order to work most effectively with the customer. They assistThe commercial organization provides our customers by developingwith customized brandin-store and in-storedigital marketing programs for all products we supply in the customers' store brand products.self-care market portfolio.


The primary objective of this store brand management approach is to enable our customers, retailersretail, e-commerce, and wholesalers,wholesale customers to increase sales and market share of their ownoverall self-care portfolio. We partner with our retailers to provide customized store brand and branded products by communicating store brandthat provide quality and value to the consumerconsumers. We invite comparison of store brand and by inviting comparisonour branded products to national brand products. Our sales and marketing personnel assist customers in the development and introduction of new store brand and our branded products, and in the promotion of customers’ existing store brand and our branded products by providing market information; establishing individualized promotions and marketing programs, which may include floor displays, bonus sizes, coupons, rebates, store signs, and promotional packs; and performing consumer research. During the year we saw consumers seeking more of their self-care product needs online, in part due to the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in the growth of e-commerce as a consumer channel for our products. We have developed resources, programs and tools to be a strategic marketing partner for our customers’ digital marketing efforts. This provides our customers with a holistic campaign to convert shoppers to store brand whether they shop in-store or online.


In contrast withto national brand manufacturers, which incur considerable advertising and marketing expenditures targeted directly to the end user or consumer, the CHCACSCA segment’s primary marketing efforts are channeled through retailers and wholesalers and reach the consumer through our customers’ in-store marketing programs and our digital media programs. Because the retail profit margin for store brand and our branded products is generally higher than for national brand products, retailers and wholesalers often commit funds for additional promotions.

Our animal health category, which has a greater emphasis on value-branded products, promotes product awareness through direct-to-consumer advertising, including television commercials, online advertising, in-store display vehicles, and social media.


In addition to in-store marketing programs, team members in our infant formulanutrition category marketsmarket products directly to consumers and healthcare professionals.


Competition


The markets for OTC pharmaceuticals and infant formulaour self-care products are highly competitive and differ for each product line and geographic region. Our primary competitors include manufacturers, such as Dr. Reddy's Labs, LNK International, Inc., PL Developments, Aurobindo and Dr. Reddy's Labs,Sun Pharmaceuticals, and brand-name pharmaceutical and consumer product companies, such as Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer,Procter & Gamble, Reckitt Benckiser, Abbott Nutrition, Bayer AG, GSK, Nestle S.A. (Gerber), Abbott Nutrition,Sanofi and Mead Johnson Nutrition Co.Philips. The competition is highly fragmented in termsvarious major categories of geographic market coverage and product categories,our CSCA business each have certain key competitors, such that a competitor generally does not compete across all product lines. However, some competitors do have larger sales volumes in certain of our categories. Additionally, national brand companies tend to have more resources committed to marketing their products and could in the future manufacture store brandsbrand versions of their products at lower prices than their national brand products. Competition is based on a variety of factors, including price, quality, assortment of products, customer service, marketing support, and approvals for new products (referproducts. Refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors - Operational Risks Related to Operations for additional information and risks associated with competition).competition.


9

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
CHCACSCI




CONSUMER HEALTHCARESELF-CARE INTERNATIONAL


Overview


The CHCICSCI segment is comprised of our consumer self-care business outside of North America, including our branded OTC sales primarilybusiness in Europe and Australia and our consumer focusedstore brand businesses in the U.K., Australia,United Kingdom and Israel.parts of Europe and Asia. The CHCICSCI segment develops, manufactures, markets, and distributes many well-known European OTCconsumer self-care brands in the cough, coldUpper respiratory, Pain and allergy,sleep-aids, Digestive health, VMS, Healthy lifestyle, Skincare and personal hygiene, and Oral care and derma-therapeutics, natural health and vitamins, and anti-parasite categories. In addition, theThe segment leverages its broad regulatory, sales, and distribution infrastructure to innovate new products and brands, in-license and expand product lines, and sell and distribute third-party brands and generic pharmaceutical products.brands. The CHCICSCI segment distributessells these products through an extensive network of customers including pharmacies, wholesalers, drug and grocery store retailers, and para-pharmacies in 28more than 23 countries, primarily in Europe. Many CHCICSCI products have market leading positions in the markets in which they compete. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, the CHCICSCI segment represented approximately 30%35% of consolidated net sales.


Through continued investment in R&D partnerships and new technologies, the CHCICSCI segment strives to offer high quality self-care products that meet consumers' needs. The combination of internalInternal R&D, in-sourcing,new product development, insourcing, acquisitions, and partnerships support the new product pipeline, both in terms of brand expansionextensions and product improvement.improvements. In the U.K., R&D focuses on oral liquid formulations for the branded Rx products for which liquid formulations are not available, as well as the development of both store brand products and products for the branded business. An additionalproducts. Additional R&D center residescenters are located in Sweden.France, Sweden, Austria, Belgium, China, the Netherlands, and Germany. In the rest of Europe, most R&D is performed by external partners with oversight byfrom our teams. The segment has sixseven plants dedicated to manufacturing certain of its products.


The CHCICSCI segment primarily focuses on building local and regional brands. In many markets outside of the U.S., a brand marketing strategy can be more effective than a store brand strategy due to the absence ofbrands sold through mass merchandisers, drug stores, individual and large scale pharmacy chains. Additionally, the absence of a centralized regulatory environment within Europe adds to the complexity of obtaining approvals for products in these markets.chain pharmacies, and e-commerce channels.


While the CHCICSCI segment sells products from over 300approximately 220 brands, both on its own and through third parties, it focuses itswe primarily concentrate our resources on its "Focus brands"Brands", whichconsisting of approximately 50 key brands and sub-brands. These are selected on the basis of their current sales and growth potential in the OTCself-care market. Additional resources, including R&D investments, are allocated to these brandsFocus Brands to buildstrengthen their market position in high opportunity profit categories while leveraging the same R&D efforts under smaller local brands.

Recent Trends and Developments

During the first half of 2021, net sales of cough and cold products decreased as a result of the very low incidence of cough, cold and flu related illness this year. We believe the very low incidence of cough, cold and flu related illness was attributed to COVID-19 social distancing and mask requirements. During the second half of 2021, we experienced higher demand for cough and cold, and pain products due primarily to the higher incidences of cough, cold and flu illness as society returned to in-person activities. The spread of certain COVID-19 variants may have contributed to these higher incidences as their symptoms can be similar. Further, consumer take away remained strong positionsduring the second half of 2021 led by cough and cold, and pain products, and we expect further normalizing of consumer purchasing routines moving forward depending on the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic. Refer to Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Executive Overview.

During the third quarter, a number of EU regulators requested recalls, some at the consumer level, due to the detection of 2-chloroethanol (“2-CE”). 2-CE has been associated with the presence of ethylene oxide, a constituent in pesticides, which is not permitted for use in food products under food regulations in the largest, most highly profitable categories inEU. Due to the OTC market, while maintaining leadership in smaller branded categories.

Recent Developments

Management has developed a strategy to: (1) implement a brand prioritization to address certain market dynamics, with an objective to balance the costpotential presence of advertising and promotional investments with expected contributions from category sales, (2) restructure the sales forceethylene oxide in certain markets to more effectively serve customers, and (3) in-source certain product manufacturing and development. The combination of these actions is expected to improve the segment's focus on higher value OTC products, reduce selling costs and improve operating margins in the segment.

As part of our previously announced strategic initiatives, management implemented improvementsvitamin, minerals and evaluatedsupplements ("VMS") products, we initiated recalls. We have since secured alternate sourcing of the overall cost structures within our CHCIraw material. During the year ended December 31, 2021, these recalls resulted in a decrease in net sales of $2.6 million and a decrease in gross profit of $5.5 million, which included obsolete inventory.

10

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
CSCI

Products

Our CSCI segment offers products and Focus Brands in the following ways:
categories:

On December 8, 2016, we announced the cancellation of the unprofitable EuroGenerics NV distribution agreement in Belgium. The year-over-year effect of the cancellation, combined with the exit of certain OTC distribution agreements, reduced our net sales by $200.3 million in 2017, with an immaterial impact to operating income.

We made progress on our previously announced restructuring plans to right-size the Omega business due to the impact of market dynamics on sales volumes. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we recognized $17.1 million of restructuring expense in the CHCI segment (refer to Item 8. Note 18).

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
CHCI


Management continues to evaluate the most effective business model for each country, aligning our sales infrastructure and actively integrating sales strategies with promotional programs.

On August 25, 2017, we completed the sale of our Russian business, which was previously classified as held-for-sale, to Alvogen Pharma LLC. The total sale price was €12.7 million ($15.1 million), inclusive of an estimated working capital adjustment, which resulted in an immaterial gain in the segment (refer to Item 8. Note 2).

The combination of these actions improved the segment's focus on higher value OTC products, reduced selling costs and improved operating margins in the segment.

The CHCI segment has been positively impacted by market dynamics in countries such as the Nordics, Italy, and Portugal, offset by softness in certain brand categories in France and Germany, as well as unfavorable foreign currency impacts primarily in the U.K. related to Brexit.

Products

Below are the categories in which the CHCI segment competes and some of the top brands in each category.
Product CategoryDescriptionFocus Brands
Cough, Cold,Pain and Allergysleep-aidsProducts comprised of pain relievers, fever reducers and sleep-aids.
Solpadeine®
Nytol®
Upper respiratoryProducts that addressrelieve upper respiratory symptoms, including traditional medicationscough suppressants, expectorants, sinus and alternative treatmentsallergy relief.
Aflubin®
Bronchenolo®/Bronchostop®
Physiomer®
Phytosun®
Coldrex®
Prevalin®/Beconase®
Digestive healthProducts such as aromatherapy solutions.antacids, anti-diarrheal, and anti-heartburn that relieve symptoms associated with digestive issues.
Healthy lifestyleProducts that help consumers live a healthy lifestyle such as smoking cessation, weight management, diabetes care, and well-being products.
BittnerNiQuitin®/Aflubin®
Bronchenolo®/Bronchostop®
ColdrexXLS (Medical)®
Libenar®
PhysiomerYokebe®
Phytosun®/Valda®
Solpadeine®/Antigrippine®
LifestyleSkincare and personal hygieneWeight management, pregnancy and fertility kits, pain relief, sleep management, smoking cessation, and eye care.
Niquitin®
Silence®/Nytol®
XLS (Medical)®
Ymea®

Personal Care and Derma-TherapeuticsProducts for the face and body includingsuch as dermatological care, sun care, baby-specific,protection, scar management, lice treatment, insect repellents, and feminine hygieneother products and solutions for various skin conditions and allergies such as eczema, psoriasis and rosacea.
conditions.
ACO®

Biodermal
®

Canoderm
®
Dermalex®

Lactacyd
®

Wartner
®
Jungle Formula®
Paranix®
Pencivir®
Natural HealthOral careProducts used for oral care, including toothbrushes, toothbrush replacement heads, floss, flossers, and Vitamin, Minerals, and Supplements ("VMS")whitening products.Vitamins, minerals, supplements, and various other natural remedies.
AbteiPlackers®
Biover®
Davitamon®
Granufink®
VMS
Anti-ParasiteVitamins, minerals, and supplements.Products focused on the elimination of parasites in both humans and pets including lice treatment and insect repellent.
Jungle FormulaAbtei®
ParanixArterin®
Davitamon®
Granufink®


Zaffranax®
Probify®
OtherDiagnostic products and other miscellaneous self-care products.


11

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
CSCI

The chart below reflects net sales by product category in the CHCICSCI segment for the year ended December 31, 2017.2021.

prgo-20211231_g3.jpg
    
Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
CHCI



We launched a number of new CHCICSCI products in the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, most notably a cold & flu triple active hot drink,some line extensions in the XLS weight management brand and ACO® brands in the Healthy lifestyle and Skincare and personal hygiene categories, respectively. In addition, we launched various intimate hygiene products, derma-therapeutics, and VMS line extensions.extensions and a pan European probiotic mix under the new brand Probify®. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, new product sales in the CHCICSCI segment were $64.1$73.9 million.


The CHCICSCI segment has more than 100 strategic new products in five product development across all categories, in development, with each of its Focus brandsBrands having a three to five-year innovation master plan.

Sales and Marketing


Our products are sold to customers includeincluding pharmacies as well as, drug, grocery, and grocerye-commerce stores located primarily in Europe, includingsuch as Walgreens Boots Alliance, McKesson, AS Watson, Tesco, ASDA, Tesco, DM, Rossmann, ETOS,Rossman, Carrefour, and Kruidvat.Amazon. The CHCICSCI segment continues to align its sales and marketing organization with current market trends by significantly increasing resources towards e-commerce and key account management. The segment sells its products primarily through an established pharmacy sales force to an extensive network of individual pharmacists. Our sales representatives visit pharmacists daily,frequently, ensuring strong in-store visibility of our brands and facilitating pharmacist education programs. Our sales, marketing, and regulatory teams use training/merchandising teams towho work in conjunction with local sales representatives to improve our brands' presence and recognition. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we have combined our traditional sales efforts with telesales to find the optimal sales model and to keep employees and customers safe. We seek to attract key talent from leading OTC, Fast Moving Consumer Goods ("FMCG"), and retailer companiesto build strong local teams throughout the countries in which the CHCICSCI segment operates.


While CHCIThe CSCI segment markets products have a higher average gross margin than products sold by the CHCA segment, selling expenses are significantly higher due to the sales force mentioned above,using intensive broadcast and digital advertising as well as targeted advertising andpoint-of-sale promotional spending to enhance brand equity. Key marketing communication tools for the CHCICSCI segment include TVtelevision and digital commercials, consumer leaflets, product websites, digital and targeted promotional campaigns.campaigns and communication programs for health care professionals.

12

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
CSCI


Competition


The competitive landscape of the European OTCconsumer products market in the categories in which we compete is highly fragmented, as local companies often hold leadership positions in individual product segmentslines in particular countries. As a result, the relevant competition in each of the CHCICSCI segment's markets is both local and global. CompetitorsGlobal competitors include Sarnofi,GSK, Sanofi, Bayer, Johnson & Johnson, Reckitt Benckiser, GSK,Teva, Viatris, Stada, Novartis, Procter & Gamble and Johnson & Johnson,e-commerce companies, as well as additional regional competitors. We believe our key advantage lies in our unique combination of best practices in sales, marketing, and product development from
Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
CHCI


FMCG and OTC/Rx, while embracing the pharmacy channeldevelopment. Refer to drive self-care (refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors - Operational Risks Related to Operations for additional information and risks associated with competition).competition.


PRESCRIPTION PHARMACEUTICALS

Overview

The RX segment develops, manufactures, and markets a portfolio of generic prescription drugs primarily in the U.S. We define this portfolio as predominantly "extended" topical as it encompasses a broad array of topical dosage forms such as creams, ointments, lotions, gels, shampoos, foams, suppositories, sprays, liquids, suspensions, solutions, and powders. The portfolio also includes select controlled substances, injectables, hormones, oral solid dosage forms, and oral liquid formulations. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the RX segment represented approximately 20% of consolidated net sales.

Our current development areas include other delivery systems such as oral liquids, metered dose inhalers, injectables, and transdermal products, some of which we are developing with third parties.Our other areas of expertise include our production capabilities for controlled substances and hormonal products. R&D efforts focus on complex formulations, many of which require costly clinical endpoint trials.

We manufacture our topical and oral products in the U.S. and Israel, and also source from various FDA-approved third parties. Rx products are manufactured, labeled, and packaged in facilities that comply with strict regulatory standards and meet customers’ stringent requirements.

In addition, the RX segment offers OTC products through the prescription channel (referred to as "ORx®", these products are marketed using the Perrigo name). ORx® products are OTC products that are available for pharmacy fulfillment and healthcare reimbursement when prescribed by a physician. We offer numerous ORx® products that are reimbursable through many health plans and the U.S. Medicaid and Medicare programs.

We actively collaborate with other pharmaceutical companies to develop, manufacture, and market certain products or groups of products. These types of agreements are common in the pharmaceutical industry. We may choose to enter into these types of agreements to, among other things, leverage our or our collaborators' scientific R&D expertise, or utilize our extensive marketing and distribution resources (refer to Item 8. Note 1 for more information regarding our method for recognizing revenue and expenses related to collaboration agreements, as well as Item 8. Note 17 for more information regarding our collaboration agreements).

Recent Developments

We continue to experience a significant reduction in pricing expectations from historical levels in our RX segment due to competitive pressures. This softness in pricing is attributable to various factors, including increased focus from customers to capture supply chain productivity savings, competition in specific products, and consolidation of certain customers. We expect this softness to continue to impact the segment for the foreseeable future, and we are forecasting a high single digit pricing decline in this segment for the year ending December 31, 2018.

We are continuing our previously announced portfolio review process, which includes the ongoing comprehensive internal evaluation of the RX segment's market position, growth opportunities, and interdependencies with our manufacturing and shared service operations to determine if strategic alternatives should be explored related to this segment.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we sold various ANDAs for a total gain of $23.0 million.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
RX

Products

Listed below are some of the generic prescription products, including authorized generic and ORx® products, that we manufacture and/or distribute:
Generic Name (1)
Comparative Brand-Name Drug
Adapalene cream
Differin®
Bacitracin ophthalmic ointmentN/A
Benzoyl peroxide 5% - clindamycin 1% gel     
BenzaClinTM
Budesonide
Entocort®
Clindamycin foam
Evoclin®
Clindamycin phosphate and benzoyl peroxide gel
Duac®
Clobetasol foam, lotion and shampoo
Olux®, Olux-E®, Clobex®
Desonide cream, ointment
Desonate®, Tridesilon®
Dihydroergotamine injectionD.H.E. 45
Halobetasol ointment and cream
Ultravate®
Hydrocortisone suppositoriesN/A
Mupirocin ointment
Bactroban®
Nystatin topical powder
Mycostatin®
Olopatadine nasal spray
Patanase®
Permethrin cream
Elimite®
Scopolamine patch
TransdermScop®
Tacrolimus
Protopic®
Testosterone 1% gelAndrogel
Testosterone cypionate injection
Depo®, Testosterone
Testosterone solution
Axiron®
Triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray
Nasacort® AQ
Triamcinolone cream/ointmentTriderm™/Kenalog™

(1)Contains the same active ingredients present in the same dosage form as the comparable brand-name drug

We launched a number of new RX products in the year ended December 31, 2017, most notably Scopolamine and Testosterone 2% topical (generic equivalent to Axiron®). During the year ended December 31, 2017, new product sales in the RX segment were $75.9 million.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, we, on our own or in collaboration with partners, received final approval from FDA health authorities for 12 Rx drug applications, and as of December 31, 2017, we had 21 Rx drug applications pending approval.

Sales and Marketing

Our customers include major wholesalers, including Cardinal Health, McKesson, and AmerisourceBergen; sourcing groups such as Red Oak and ClarusOne; national and regional retail drug, supermarket and mass merchandise chains, including Walgreens Boots Alliance, Rite Aid, Walmart, CVS, Kroger, and Safeway; hospitals; and pharmacies. ORx® products are sold to the consumer through the pharmacy counter of predominantly the same retail outlets as our OTC pharmaceutical products.

Competition

The market for Rx products is subject to intense competition from other generic drug manufacturers, brand-name pharmaceutical companies launching their own generic version of their branded products (known as an authorized generic), manufacturers of branded drug products that continue to produce those products after patent expirations, and manufacturers of therapeutically similar drugs. Among our generic drug manufacturer competitors are Par Pharmeceuticals, Apotex Corp., Glenmark Generics Inc., Impax Laboratories, Inc., Mylan, Prasco, LLC, Sandoz, Sun Pharmaceuticals, Taro Pharmaceuticals, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., and Akorn.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
RX

We believe that one of our primary competitive advantages is our ability to introduce difficult to develop and/or manufacture topical generic versions to brand-name drug products. Generally, these products are exposed to less competition due to the relatively longer and more expensive development, clinical trial, and approval processes. In addition, we believe we have a favorable competitive position due primarily to our efficient distribution systems, topical production economies of scale, customer service, and overall reputation (refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors - Risks Related to Operations for more information and risks associated with competition).

SPECIALTY SCIENCES

Overview

The Specialty Sciences segment was comprised of assets focused on the treatment of multiple sclerosis, specifically in connection with the drug Tysabri® (natalizumab). We received contingent payments related to the Tysabri® financial asset until we disposed of it on March 27, 2017.

We were entitled to contingent payments from Biogen Idec Inc. ("Biogen") based on its Tysabri® sales in all indications and geographies. We received contingent payments that were based on royalties of 12% on worldwide Biogen sales of Tysabri® from December 18, 2013 through April 30, 2014. As of May 1, 2014, we received royalties of 18% on annual worldwide Biogen sales of Tysabri® up to $2.0 billion and 25% on annual sales above $2.0 billion. The cash received from Biogen for the royalty percentage on Tysabri® sales was recorded as cash flows from investing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow.

We had recorded the Tysabri® royalty stream as a financial asset and elected to account for this asset using the fair value option method, which incorporates discounted cash flows related to the expected future cash flows to be received. We used significant judgment in determining our valuation inputs, including estimates as to the probability and timing of future sales of Tysabri®, as well as estimates of the expected future cash flows. The estimated fair value of the asset was subject to variation should those cash flows vary significantly from our estimates. We had performed evaluations at each reporting period to assess those estimates, discount rates utilized and general market conditions affecting fair value (refer to Item 8. Note 6).

The Specialty Sciences segment also included ongoing obligations under the sale agreement between Biogen and Elan for 50% of losses and litigation expenses arising out of any Tysabri® product liability claims, required insurance coverage and related expenses. Effective January 1, 2017, due to the sale of the Tysabri® financial asset, all the above mentioned expenses were moved to unallocated expenses.

On March 27, 2017, we announced the completed divestment of our Tysabri® financial asset to Royalty Pharma for up to $2.85 billion, consisting of $2.2 billion in cash and up to $250.0 million and $400.0 million in milestone payments if the royalties on global net sales of Tysabri® that are received by Royalty Pharma meet specific thresholds in 2018 and 2020, respectively. As a result of this transaction, we transferred the entire financial asset to Royalty Pharma and recorded a $17.1 million gain during the three months ended April 1, 2017. We elected to account for the contingent milestone payments using the fair value option method, and these were recorded at an estimated fair value of $134.5 million as of December 31, 2017 (refer to Item 8. Note 6 and Item 1A. Risk Factors - Risks Related to Operations).

OTHER

Recent Developments

We had an Other segment that was primarily comprised of sales of API products, which did not meet the quantitative threshold required to be a separate reportable segment. We developed, manufactured, and marketed API products, which were used worldwide by both generic and branded pharmaceutical companies. Certain of these ingredients were used in our own pharmaceutical products. The manufacturing of API occurred primarily in Israel with some production in India.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Other


On April 6, 2017, we completed the sale of our India API business to Strides Shasun Limited. We received $22.2 million of proceeds, inclusive of an estimated working capital adjustment, which resulted in an immaterial gain recorded in Other expense (Income), net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Prior to closing the sale, we determined that the carrying value of the India API business exceeded its fair value less the cost to sell, resulting in an impairment charge of $35.3 million, which was recorded in Impairment charges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 (refer to Item 8. Note 2).

On November 21, 2017, we completed the sale of our Israel API business, which was previously classified as held-for-sale to SK Capital, for a sale price of $110.0 million, which resulted in an immaterial gain recorded in Other expense (Income), net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations (refer to Item 8. Note 2 and Note 6).

INFORMATION APPLICABLE TO ALL REPORTABLE SEGMENTS

Research and Development
R&D is a key componentof our business strategy and is performed in various locations in the countries in which we operate. While we conduct a significant amount of our own R&D, we also enter into strategic alliance agreements to obtain the rights to manufacture and/or distribute new products. R&D investments were $167.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 (refer to Item 8. Note 17).

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we wrote off capitalized in-process research and development from previous acquisitions totaling $12.7 million and $3.5 million, respectively, due to changes in the projected development and regulatory timelines for various projects.

The year ended December 31, 2017 included R&D expense related to new product development and clinical trial expenses in our CHCA, CHCI and RX segments. The year ended December 31, 2016 included R&D expense related to clinical trial expenses primarily in our CHCA and RX segments. The six months ended December 31, 2015 included incremental R&D expense due to the Omega acquisition. The six months ended December 27, 2014 included a $10.0 million payment made in connection with our entry into a collaboration arrangement. The year ended June 27, 2015 also included incremental R&D expense due to the Omega acquisition, as well as the payment made in relation to the collaboration arrangement noted above, and an R&D contractual arrangement under which we funded $18.0 million of R&D.

We anticipate that R&D expenditures will increase as a percentage of net salesfor the foreseeable future as we continue to cultivate our presence in the Rx-to-OTC switch and generic pharmaceutical markets,and develop our internal R&D capabilities (refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors - Risks Related to Operations for risks associated with innovation and R&D).


Trademarks, Patents and PatentsLicensing Agreements


While we own certain trademarks and patents, neither our business as a whole, nor any of our segments, is materially dependent upon our ownership of any one trademark, or patent, or group of trademarks or patents.


Materials Sourcing


Affordable, high qualityhigh-quality raw materials and packaging components are essential to all of our business units due to the nature of the products we manufacture. Raw materials and packaging components are generally available from multiple suppliers. Supplies of certain raw materials bulk tablets, and packaging components, due to their technical specifications and product delivery systems, may be more limited, as they are available from one or only a few suppliers and may require regulatory approvalextensive compatibility testing before we can use them. Prior to the sale of our Israel and India API businesses, we had the ability to manufacture and supply certain API for our OTC and Rx products, which we now source from the companies that have acquired our API business. We have been purchasing an increasing number of components and select finished goods rather than manufacturing them because of the availability of goods, economic reasons, temporary production limitations, FDA restrictions, sale of our API business, and other factors.


Historically, we have been able to react effectively, yet not always immediately, to situations that require alternate sourcing. Should such alternate sourcing be necessary, FDA requirements placed on products approved through the ANDA or NDA
Perrigo Company plc - Item 1


process could substantially lengthen the approval of an alternate source and adversely affect financial results. We believe we have good, cooperative working relationships with substantially all of our suppliers and have historically been able to capitalize on economies of scale in the purchase of materials and supplies due to our volume of purchases (referpurchases. Refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors - Operational Risks Related to Operations for risks associated with materials sourcing).sourcing. Refer to Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Executive Overview for a detailed discussion of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our material sourcing.


Manufacturing and Distribution


Our primary manufacturing facilities are in the U.S. We also have manufacturing facilities in the U.K., Belgium, France, Germany, Austria, Israel, Mexico, China, and Australia, along with a joint venture in China (referChina. Refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors - Operational Risks Related to Operations for risks associated with our manufacturing facilities).facilities. We supplement our production capabilities with the purchase of products from outside sources. The capacity of some facilities may be fully utilized at certain times for various reasons, such as customer demand, the seasonality of thecertain product categories (for example, our cough/cold/flu and allergy or flea and tick seasons,products), and new product launches. We may utilize available capacity by performing contract manufacturing for other companies. We have logistics facilities in the U.S., Israel, Mexico, Australia, and numerous locations throughout Europe. We use contract freight and common carriers to deliver our products. Refer to Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Executive Overview for a detailed discussion of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our manufacturing and distribution.


Significant Customers

Our primaryWe have one significant customer base aligns with the concentrationthat represents approximately 14% of large drug retailers in the current global retail drug industry marketplace. Walmart is our largest customer and accounted for the following percentage of consolidated net sales:
Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 December 27,
2014
 June 27,
2015
13% 13% 13% 19% 16%

Sales to Walmart are primarily in the CHCA segment. As a percentage of our total U.S. OTC sales, our sales to Walmart generally align with Walmart's U.S. retail market share in the productssales. While we sell to them. In addition, whilehave other important customers, no other individual customer individually comprisesrepresents more than 10% of net sales, we do have other significant customers.sales. However, the loss of one or more of our customers could be material. We believe we generally have good relationships with all of our customers (refercustomers. Refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors - Operational Risks Related to Operations for risks associated with customers).customers.


13

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1

Environmental


WeOur facilities and operations are subject to various environmental laws and regulations. We undergo periodic internal audits relating to environmental, health and safety requirements in order to maintain compliance with applicable laws and regulations in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. We have made, and continue to make, expenditures necessary to comply with applicable environmental laws, butlaws; however, we do not believe that the costs for complying with such laws and regulations have been or will be material to our business. We do not have any material remediation liabilities outstanding.


While we believe that climate change could present risks to our business, including increased operating costs due to additional regulatory requirements, physical risks to our facilities, water limitations, and disruptions to our supply chain, we do not believe these risks are material to our business in the near term.

Human Capital Resources

We are passionate about making lives better. At Perrigo, we believe that the continuous personal and professional development of our people is an important component of our ability to attract, retain, and motivate top talent, which are all important aspects of our self-care strategy. Our global workforce consists of more than 9,900 full time and part time employees spread across 34 countries, of which approximately 21% were covered by collective bargaining agreements as of December 31, 2021. We continuously endeavor to provide a diverse, inclusive, and safe work environment so our colleagues can bring their best to work, every day. We are all responsible for upholding Perrigo’s Core Values - Integrity, Respect, and Responsibility - in addition to the Perrigo Code of Conduct which, together, form the foundation of all our policies, procedures, and practices. Together, we drive Perrigo forward to deliver on our vision to make lives better by bringing Quality, Affordable Self-Care Products that consumers trust everywhere they are sold.

Diversity and Inclusion

We strive for our workforce to represent the diverse consumer base we wish to serve enabling us to continue to deliver on our self-care promise. We believe diverse representation and practicing inclusion creates lasting benefits for Perrigo colleagues, our customers, consumers, and shareholders through enhanced team performance, innovation, and profitable growth. To accomplish this objective, we rolled out a three-year strategy at the beginning of 2020 that focuses on three key diversity and inclusion areas:

Educating our workforce on our diversity and inclusion strategy and initiatives;
Strengthening our talent management practices through a lens of equity and inclusion; and
Creating diversity and inclusion governance and accountability to establish our foundation and help us monitor progress.

Perrigo is committed to the well-being of the communities we serve and the individuals who work with us. Accordingly, we continue to take action to help address oppression and inequality based on multiple aspects of diversity. We understand the devastating impact that systemic oppression, injustice, and acts of violence have on underrepresented communities. Murray Kessler, President and CEO, has encouraged all Perrigo colleagues to stand united and take responsibility to learn how each of us can play a role in promoting inclusion and fighting both discrimination and implicit bias in the workplace and in our society as a whole. These efforts include open dialogues between our Board of Directors and Executive Operating Committee on topics including diversity, equity and inclusivity. Our Perrigo colleagues, including senior management, continually receive educational resources and information on how to best serve as allies in support of underrepresented groups and to learn how we can contribute to healing our society's divisions. All colleagues are encouraged to practice self-care and are provided support resources such as our global Employee Assistance Program that includes staff members who identify with various underrepresented communities and speak multiple languages.

Compensation, Benefits, Health, Safety, and Well-being

Perrigo’s commitment to self-care starts with our own team. Our top priority during the global COVID-19 pandemic has been, and continues to be, the safety of our colleagues. When faced with the challenges of this pandemic, we focused on understanding and supporting each diverse individual and the unique circumstances impacting their ability to serve as an essential worker. We have implemented safety measures to protect our on-site essential colleagues, while asking those who can safely work from home to do so. On-site, we've implemented a
14

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1

multi-step pre-screening process before entry into any facility, deep-cleaning protocols, and other safety precautions, all consistent with the rules and guidelines in each jurisdiction.

We strive to provide pay, benefits and services that support the total well-being of our people. Our total rewards package delivers competitive pay, broad-based stock grants, cash-based annual incentives, healthcare, retirement benefits, paid time off, and on-site services, among other benefits.

Perrigo’s total rewards complement a strong health and safety culture that continues with our global well-being program designed to inspire colleagues to maintain and improve their health. Launched in 2016, Perrigo’s "HEALTHYyou" well-being program continues to support colleagues and their families as they navigate their own self-care and well-being journeys. Our colleagues highly value this program and it continues to be recognized externally by receiving the Best and Brightest in Wellness™ Award in each year since 2017.

Growth, Development, and Engagement

We are committed to engaging our colleagues and fostering a belonging culture, where our people feel enabled to contribute their best to Perrigo's self-care transformation. This includes initiatives supporting overall job satisfaction, diversity and inclusion, personal and professional skill development, work/life balance, and an environment that encourages good health and safety, while upholding our core values of Integrity, Respect, and Responsibility.

Perrigo regularly conducts global engagement surveys to gather feedback from colleagues to identify strengths and opportunities within our culture. We have implemented a competency model to clarify the behaviors that reinforce our culture and lead to success at Perrigo. Additionally, we use a variety of channels to facilitate open and direct communication, including regular open forums and town hall meetings with our executive leadership team.

Our development philosophy focuses on a 70-20-10 approach, which provides a practical, blended framework for learning to support individual long-term success (where individuals obtain 70% of their knowledge from job-related experiences, 20% from interactions with others, and 10% from formal educational events). We have significantly expanded our learning capabilities by providing access to extensive on-demand self-study content to colleagues. We believe this model enables our people to deliver on our self-care vision by empowering them to be their best and make a difference to Perrigo Colleagues, Customers, Consumers, Communities, and Shareholders.

Corporate Social Responsibility


We are committed to doing business in an ethicala socially, environmentally and fiscally responsible manner. We have a long history of environmentally sound and efficient operations, safe and healthy working conditions, and active participation in the communities where we are located. AsThat commitment is reflected in our well-established governance, corporate responsibility and sustainability programs, as well as by our board oversight of governance and sustainability. A summary of our environmental and social initiatives is below, and additional details can be found in our 2021 Corporate Social Responsibility Commitment Statement(“CSR”) Report available on our website,website. In 2020, we remainadopted the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (“UN SDG”) as a global framework and committed to:to six goals within the UN SDG framework. In 2021, we set new specific objectives and targets for the next five years related to each of these goals, which are detailed in our 2021 CSR report. Our progress towards achieving these goals and objectives will be updated in our subsequent CSR reports on an annual basis.


Helping consumers access safe, effectiveEnvironmental: we are committed to manufacturing our products responsibly, supporting the global drive to reduce carbon emissions and affordable healthcare products;
Strong corporate governance;
Complying with regulatory and legal requirements;
Demonstrating environmental stewardship;
Perrigo Company plc - Item 1


Continuously improving packaging sustainability;
Protecting human rights of our global employees and challenging our partners to do the same;
Diversity of thought, experience and perspective;
Providing a safe and healthy work environment for our employees; and
Establishing effective community partnerships.

Through these efforts, we strive to minimize our impact on the environment, drive responsible business practices, and ensureclimate. We formalized our commitment to sustainability in 2015 by establishing a corporate sustainability strategy focused on reducing the welfareenvironmental impact of our employees, their families,operations, product packaging, and supply chain. In 2020, we enhanced that strategy by committing to Goal 12: Responsible Production and Consumption and Goal 13: Climate Action, of the communities in whichUN SDG.

Social: Our vision is to make lives better, by bringing quality affordable self-care products that consumers trust, everywhere they are sold. This puts the social impact of our business front and center. We are proud to maintain goals and programs relating to Diversity and Inclusion, Human Capital Management, Human Rights, and Community Engagement and Giving. In 2020, as part of our social initiatives, we operate nowcommitted to Goal 3: Good Health and intoWell-being, Goal 4: Quality Education, Goal 5: Gender Equality, and Goal 10: Reducing Inequality, of the future.UN SDG.


15

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Regulation

GOVERNMENT REGULATION AND PRICING


The manufacturing, processing, formulation, packaging, labeling, testing, storing, distributing, advertising, and saleselling of our products are subject to regulation by a variety of agencies in the localities in which our products are sold. In addition, we manufacture and market certain of our products in accordance with standards set by various organizations. We believe that our policies, operations, and products comply in all material respects with existing regulations to which we are subject (refersubject. Refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors - Operational Risks Related to Operations for related risks).risks.


United States Regulation


U.S. Food and Drug Administration


The FDA has jurisdiction over our Rx, OTC drug products, API, medical devices and Infant Formula Foods.products. The FDA’s jurisdiction extends to the manufacturing, testing, labeling, packaging, storage, distribution, and promotion of these products. We are committed to consistently providing our customers with high quality products that adhere to "current Good Manufacturing Practices" ("cGMP") regulations promulgated by the FDA. If the FDA or comparable regulatory authority becomes aware of new safety information about any of our products, these authorities may require further inspection, enhancement to manufacturing controls, labeling changes, additional testing method requirements, restrictions on indicated uses or marketing, post-approval studies or post-market surveillance.


OTC and Rx Pharmaceuticals


All facilities where Rx and OTC products are manufactured, tested, packaged, stored, or distributed for the U.S. market must comply with FDA cGMPs and regulations promulgated by competent authorities in the countries, states and localities where the facilities are located. All of our drug products are manufactured, tested, packaged, stored, and distributed according to cGMP regulations. The FDA performs periodic audits to ensure that our facilities remain in compliance with all appropriate regulations.


Many of our OTC products are regulated under the OTC monograph system and subject to certain FDA regulations. Under this system, selected OTC drugs are generally recognized as safe and effective and do not require the approval of an ANDA or NDA prior to marketing. Products marketed under the OTC monograph system must conform to specific quality, formula, and labeling requirements, including permitted indications, required warnings and precautions, allowable combinations of ingredients, and dosage levels. It is generally less costly to develop and bring to market a product regulated under the OTC monograph system.

            We also market generic prescription drugs and non-prescription products that have switched from prescription to OTC status. Prior to commercial marketing, these products require approval by the FDA of an ANDA or NDA that provides information on chemistry, manufacturing controls, clinical safety, efficacy and/or bioequivalence, packaging, and labeling. While the development process for these drugs generally requires less time and expense than the development process of a new drug, the size and duration of required studies can vary greatly. Prior to the onset of the Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012 (“GDUFA”), the FDA approval of generic drug applications took approximately three to five times longer than approval of innovator drugs. Pursuant to GDUFA II, beginning October 1, 2017, year five of the program, the FDA pledged to complete a first cycle review on 90% of electronic generic applications within 10 months of submission.


Under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, as amended ("FFDCA") (the Hatch-Waxman amendments), a company submitting an NDA can obtain a three-year period of marketing exclusivity for a prescription oran OTC product if it performs a clinical study that is essential to FDA approval. Longer periods of exclusivity are possible for new chemical entities, orphan drugs (those designated under section 526 of the FFDCA) and drugs under the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now Act. During this exclusivity period, the FDA cannot
Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Regulation


approve any ANDAs for a similar or equivalent generic product, which can preclude another party from marketing a similar product during this period. A company may obtain an additional six months of exclusivity if it conducts pediatric studies requested by the FDA on the product. This exclusivity can delay both the FDA approval and sales of certain products.


A companyUnder certain circumstances, the first filer of an ANDA may be entitled to a 180-day generic exclusivity period for certain products. This exclusivity period often follows a patent certification and litigation process whereby the product innovator may sue for infringement. The legal action does not ordinarily result in material damages, but it generally triggers a statutorily mandated delay in FDA approval of the ANDA for a period of up to 30 months from when the innovator was notified of the patent challenge.


The Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act ("FDASIA") was signed into law on July 9, 2012. The law established, among other things, new user fee statutes for generic drugs and biosimilars, FDA authority concerning drug shortages, and changes to enhance the FDA's inspection authority of the drug supply chain, and a limited extension of the 30-month stay provision described above.chain. The FDASIA also reduced the time required for FDA responses to generic-blocking citizen petitions. We implemented new systems and processes to comply with the new facility self-identification and user fee requirements of the FDASIA, and we monitor facility self-identification and fee payment compliance to mitigate the risk of potential supply chain interruptions or delays in regulatory approval of new applications.


The U.S. government's Federal Drug Supply Chain SecurityFDA Reauthorization Act ("DSCSA") requires developmentof 2017 created a pathway by which the FDA may, at the request of an electronic pedigree to trackapplicant, designate a drug with “inadequate generic competition” as a Competitive Generic Therapy ("CGT"). At the
16

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Regulation

request of the applicant, the FDA may expedite the development and trace each prescriptionreview of an ANDA for a drug designated as a CGT. The first approved application for a drug with a CGT designation for which there are no unexpired patents or exclusivities listed in the Orange Book at the salable unit level throughtime of original submission of the distribution system, which willANDA may be effective incrementally over a 10-year period. The serializationeligible for 180 days of all Rxgeneric exclusivity.

Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients

Third parties develop and manufacture APIs for use in certain of our pharmaceutical products distributedthat are sold in the U.S. neededand other global markets. API manufacturers typically submit a drug master file to the regulatory authority that provides the proprietary information related to the manufacturing process. The FDA inspects the manufacturing facilities to assess cGMP compliance, and the facilities and procedures must be completedcGMP compliant before API may be exported to the U.S.

Medical Devices

We are subject to the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 to the FFDCA and its subsequent amendments in the US. The regulations issued thereunder provide for regulation by November 26, 2018, with the requirement for trackingFDA of the design, manufacture and marketing of medical devices, including some of our products commencingmarketed under our oral care and OTC businesses. All of our current medical devices fall under Class I or Class II of the regulations. These products do not require premarket approval but may or may not require a 510(k) premarket notification depending on November 27, 2023. Requirements forwhether or not the tracing of products atproduct is 510(k) exempt. These devices are also subject to other general controls established by the lot level through the pharmaceutical distribution supply chain went into effect on January 1, 2015 for manufacturers, wholesale distributors,FDA, such as registration, listing, labeling, and re-packagers, and on July 1, 2015 for dispensers.reporting obligations.


Infant Formula and Foods


The FDA’s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition is responsible for the regulation of infant formula. The Office of Nutrition, Labeling and Dietary Supplements ("ONLDS") has labeling responsibility for infant formula, while the Office of Food Additive Safety ("OFAS") has program responsibility for food ingredients and packaging. The ONLDS evaluates whether an infant formula manufacturer has met the requirements under the FFDCA and consults with the OFAS regarding the safety of ingredients in infant formula and of packaging materials for infant formula.


All manufacturers of pediatric nutrition products must begin with safe food ingredients, which are either generally recognized as safe or approved as food additives. The Infant Formula Act provides specific requirements for infant formula to ensure the safety and nutrition of infant formulas, including minimum and, in some cases, maximum levels of specified nutrients.


Before marketing a particular infant formula, the manufacturer must provide regulatory agencies assurance of the nutritional quality of that particular formulation consistent with the FDA’s labeling, nutrient content, and manufacturer quality control requirements. A manufacturer must notify the FDA at least 90 days before the marketing of any infant formula that differs fundamentally in processing or in composition from any previous formulation produced by the manufacturer. We actively monitor this process and make the appropriate adjustments to remain in compliance with recent FDA rules regarding cGMP, quality control procedures, quality factors, notification requirements, and reports and records for the production of infant formulas.


In addition, the FFDCA requires infant formula manufacturers to test product composition during production and shelf-life; to keep records on production, testing, and distribution of each batch of infant formula; to use cGMP and quality control procedures; and to maintain records of all complaints and adverse events, some of which may reveal the possible existence of a health hazard. The FDA conducts yearly inspections of all facilities that manufacture infant formula, inspects new facilities during early production runs, and collects and analyzes samples of infant formula. Our infant formula manufacturing facilities have been inspected by the FDA after the effective date of the final rule and found to be in full compliance with the new GMP regulations with no corrective actions required.required from the most recent inspections.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Regulation




Our infant and toddler foodsbeverages are subject to the Food Safety Modernization Act ("FSMA"), which protects the safety of U.S. foods by mandating comprehensive, prevention-based controls within the food industry. Under FSMA, the FDA has mandatory recall authority for all food products and greater authority to inspect food producers and is taking steps toward product tracing to enable more efficient product source identification in the event of a safety issue.


Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients
17

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1

Regulation
Third parties develop and manufacture API for use in certain of our products that are exported to the U.S. and other global markets. Before API can be commercialized in the U.S., the manufacturer and/or developer must submit a drug master file ("DMF") that provides the proprietary information related to the manufacturing process. The FDA inspects the manufacturing facilities to assess cGMP compliance, and the facilities and procedures must be cGMP compliant before API may be exported to the U.S.

The facilities and products are subject to regulation by the applicable regulatory bodies in the place of manufacture as well as the regulatory agency in the country from which the product is exported or imported. For API exported to European markets, the manufacturer must submit a European DMF and, where applicable, obtain a certificate of suitability from the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines. The manufacturing facilities and production procedures for API marketed in Europe must meet EU-GMP and European Pharmacopeia standards.

U.S. Department of Agriculture


The Organic Foods Production Act enacted under Title 21 of the 1990 Farm Bill established uniform national standards for the production and handling of foods labeled as "organic." Our infant formula manufacturing sites in Vermont and Ohio adhere to the standards of the U.S. Department of Agriculture ("USDA") National Organic Program for production, handling, and processing to maintain the integrity of organic products. Our infant formula manufacturing sites in Vermontproducts and Ohio are USDA-certified, enabling them to produce and label organic products for U.S. and Canadian markets.


U.S. Environmental Protection Agency


The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") is the main regulatory body in the United States for veterinary pesticides. The EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs is responsible forgoverning environmental regulation. Laws administered by the regulation of pesticide products appliedEPA, often in partnership with state agencies, include but are not limited to animals. All manufacturers of animal health pesticides must show that their products will not cause “unreasonable adverse effects to man or the environment” as stated inClean Air Act; the Clean Water Act; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act; and the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. Within the U. S., pesticide products that are approved by the EPA must also be approved by individual state pesticide authorities before distribution in that state. Post-approval monitoring of products is required, with reports provided to the EPA and some state regulatory agencies.


U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration


The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration ("DEA") regulates certain drug products containing controlled substances, such as morphine, hydromorphone, opium, testosterone, midazolam, and List I chemicals, such as pseudoephedrine, pursuant to the federal Controlled Substances Act ("CSA") and the Substance Use-Disorder Prevention that Promotes Opioid Recovery Treatment for Patients and Communities Act ("SUPPORT Act"). The CSA and DEA regulations impose registration, security, record keeping, suspicious order monitoring, reporting, storage, manufacturing, distribution, importation and other requirements upon legitimate handlers under the oversight of the DEA. The DEA categorizes controlled substances into Schedules I, II, III, IV, or V, with varying qualifications for listing in each schedule. We are subject to the requirements regarding the controlled substances in Schedules II - V and the List I chemicals. Our facilities that manufacture, distribute, import, or export any controlled substancesList 1 Chemicals must register annually with the DEA.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Regulation



The DEA inspects all manufacturingregistered facilities to review security, record keeping, reporting, and handling prior to issuing a controlled substance registration, and it also periodically inspects facilities for compliance with the CSA and its regulations. Failure to maintain compliance with applicable requirements, particularly as manifested in the loss or diversion of controlledDEA regulated substances, can result in enforcement action, such as civil penalties, refusal to renew necessary registration, or the initiation of proceedings to revoke those registrations. In certain circumstances, violations could lead to criminal prosecution. We are also subject to state laws regulating the manufacture and distribution of certain products.


Federal Healthcare Programs and Drug Pricing Regulation

WithinIn the U.S., government healthcare insurance and welfare programs such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs are important third partythird-party payers for patients who taketreated with our products. TheseWhile these programs include several indirect formsmay cover OTC products under some circumstances, utilization of price regulation applicable to our drug products as a condition to coverage and/or payment for our products and alsounder these programs is limited.When covering our products, these programs regulate the amount that pharmacies and other healthcare providers will beare paid for our products. Specifically, U.S. law requires that a pharmaceutical manufacturer, as a condition of having federal funds being made available forWe participate in the manufacturer’s drugs under following programs, and are subject to associated price reporting, payment, and other compliance obligations:

Medicaid and Medicare Part B, enter into three government pricing program agreements: (i) a Medicaid rebate agreement with the Secretary of Health and Human ServicesDrug Rebate Program (“HHS”MDRP”)—We are required to pay rebates to state Medicaid programs for the manufacturer’s covered outpatient drugs that are dispensed to Medicaid beneficiaries and paid for by a state Medicaid program; (ii) a 340B program agreement with the Secretary of HHS to provide discounts to certain “covered entity” safety net healthcare providers; and (iii) a Master Agreement with the Department of Veterans Affairs ("VA") under which discounts are available for purchases by federal agencies. We have such agreements in effect.

Medicaid Rebate Agreement

The Medicaid rebate agreement requires the drug manufacturer to remit rebates to each state Medicaid agency on a quarterly basis for both fee-for-service and Medicaid managed care organization utilization. Rebate amounts are based onreport pricing data reported by the manufacturer to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”), including Average Manufacturer Price ("AMP" on a monthly and quarterly basis, and to pay rebates to state Medicaid programs on units of our drugs covered by such programs.

340B Drug Pricing Program—We are required to charge certain healthcare providers, known as 340B “covered entities,” no more than the statutorily-defined 340B “ceiling price” for our covered outpatient drugs, and must report the 340B ceiling price to the government.

Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) and,Federal Supply Schedule (“FSS”)—We anticipate participating in the caseFSS contracting program, which would require us to charge certain agencies (the VA, Department of innovator products, BestDefense, Public Health Service and Coast Guard) no more than a statutory Federal Ceiling Price ("BP"). U.S. law also requires that a company that participates in the Medicaid rebate program report average sales price ("ASP") information to CMS for each calendar quarter for certain categories of drugs that are paid under Part Bdrugs. FSS contracts include extensive disclosure and certification requirements and standard government terms and conditions with which we would have to comply. We would also expect to enter into an agreement to pay rebates on innovator drug prescriptions dispensed to TRICARE beneficiaries by TRICARE network retail pharmacies.
18

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Regulation


Calculations of the Medicare program. CMS uses these submissions to determine payment rates for drugs under Medicare Part B.

Under the Medicaid rebate program, the minimum rebate amounts due are as follows: (i) for noninnovator products, in general generic drugs marketed under ANDAs, the rebate amount is 13% of the AMP for the quarter; and (ii) for innovator products, in general brand-name products marketed under NDAs, the rebate amount is the greater of 23.1% of the AMP for the quarter or the difference between such AMP and the BP for that same quarter. Manufacturers also pay an “additional rebate" on innovator drugs where price increases since launch have outpaced inflation. Beginning with the first quarter of 2017, an additional rebate is due for noninnovator products, which is calculated somewhat differently from the innovator product additional rebate, but likewise generally applies where and to the extent that a manufacturer’s AMP increases faster than the rate of inflation.

CMS issued a final regulation, generally effective April 1, 2016, to implement changes to the Medicaid rebate programdata we must submit under the 2010 health reform legislation (“Health Reform Law”) and otherwise to provide program guidance. In addition to guidance concerning rebate program administration matters, the regulation also addressed certain related Medicaid reimbursement matters. First, under the Health Reform Law, CMS has also begun to use manufacturer AMP data to calculate reimbursement limits for pharmacies for multiple source drugs under the Medicaid program, known as the federal upper limits ("FULs"). CMS also surveys and publishes retail community pharmacy acquisition cost information to provide state Medicaid agencies with a basis for comparing their own reimbursement and pricing methodologies and rates. Second, the regulation also directed states to update their Medicaid payment methodologies to provide for payment amounts designed to reflect pharmacies’ "actual acquisition costs" for drugs, a change from the prior "estimated acquisition" standard. The regulation also required states to provide the government with findings to support their compliance with this standard by April 1, 2017.

Pricing and rebate calculationsforegoing programs are governed by statutory and regulatory requirements that are complex, vary among products and programs, can change over time, and are subject to interpretation by us, governmental or regulatory agencies,, and the courts. InFailure to comply with program obligations may result in civil monetary penalties and other punitive measures and liability, such as exclusion from some programs. We cannot be certain that our submissions will not be found by the case of the Medicaid rebate program, if we become aware of errors in
Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Regulation


our prior price submissions, or a prior BP submission needsgovernment to be updated dueincomplete or incorrect. Refer to late arriving data,the risk factors under the heading “If we must resubmit the updated data within specified time frames. Such restatements and recalculations increase our cost of compliancefail to comply with the Medicaid rebate program,reporting and corrections can result in an overage or underage of our rebate liability for past quarters, depending on the nature of the correction.

340B Program Agreement

The 340B drug pricing program requires participating manufacturers to agree to charge statutorily-defined covered entities no more than the 340B “ceiling price” for the manufacturer’s covered outpatient drugs. The ceiling price is derived from the data the manufacturer reportspayment obligations under the MedicaidMDRP or other governmental purchasing and rebate program and therefore any changesprograms, we could be subject to statutoryfines or regulatory requirements applicable to the Medicaid price figures may impact the 340B ceiling price calculation as well. 340B covered entities include a variety of community health clinics and other entities that receive health services grants from the Public Health Service, as well as certain hospitals that serve a disproportionate share of low-income patients.penalties, which could be material" in Item 1A. Risk Factors - Operational Risks.

Master Agreement with the Department of Veterans Affairs
U.S. law also requires any company that participates in the Medicaid rebate program and Medicare Part B and that wants its covered drugs paid for by certain federal agencies and grantees to enter into a Master Agreement with the VA. Under the Master Agreement, the company must offer its innovator drugs for procurement under the Federal Supply Schedule (“FSS”) contracting program, and must charge certain agencies (VA, Department of Defense, Public Health Service and the Coast Guard) no more than a statutory Federal Ceiling Price (“FCP”). The FCP is calculated based on Non-Federal Average Manufacturer Price (“NFAMP”) data we submit to the VA. FSS contracts include extensive disclosure and certification requirements and standard government terms and conditions with which we must comply. Consistent with VA’s interpretation of the Master Agreement, we have also entered into an agreement to pay rebates on covered drug prescriptions dispensed to TRICARE beneficiaries by TRICARE network retail pharmacies.


Medicare Part D “Coverage Gap” Rebates


ForIf we market certain innovator products, manufacturers must also enter into an agreement with the Secretary of HHSwe will have to provide rebates with respect to utilization of their products by certain Medicare Part D beneficiaries while those patients are within the Medicare Part D benefit “coverage gap.” Manufacturers are not required to submit separate pricing data under this program; theThe rebate amount is calculated by CMS based on Part D plans’plans “negotiated prices” paid to pharmacies.


Other Price Regulation and State Regulation


In addition to these technical government pricing regulation programs, drugDrug pricing has come under increasing public scrutiny arising out of general concerns about highscrutiny. Congress is considering various amendments to federal drug costs or price increases,pricing laws and transparencynew forms of pricing regulation which would increase the financial and discounting practices withincompliance burdens associated with our participation in the pharmaceutical distribution system.federal programs. Several states including Maryland, Nevada, and California, have recently enacted laws that, prohibit “price gouging,”among other things, require manufacturers to report certain information concerning price increases exceeding certain amounts, and/drug pricing or marketing practices or to provide advance notice of price increasesactions or applications for regulatory approvals. These laws provide for penalties in case of errors or failure to certain entities (refercomply. Refer to the risk factors under the headings "Limitations on reimbursement, continuing healthcare reforms, and changes to reimbursement methods in the U.S. and other counties may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations" and “If we fail to comply with the reporting and payment obligations under the MDRP or other governmental purchasing and rebate programs, we could be subject to fines or penalties, which could be material” in Item 1A. Risk Factors - Operational Risks Related to Operations for risks related to the above-mentioned programs).


Other U.S. Regulations and Organizations


We are subject to various other federal, state, non-governmental, and local agency rules and regulations. Compliance with the laws and regulations regarding the manufacture and sale of our current products and the discovery, development, and introduction of new products requires substantial effort, expense and capital investment. Other regulatory agencies, organizations, legislation, regulationregulations and laws that may impact our business include, but are not limited to:


Physician Payment Sunshine Act and Similar State Laws - This act requiresand similar state laws require certain pharmaceutical manufacturers to engage in extensive tracking of payments or transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals, maintenance of a payment database and public reporting of the payment data.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Regulation



Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 ("FCPA") - This act and other similar anti-bribery laws prohibit companies and their intermediaries from providing money or anything of value to officials of foreign governments, foreign political parties or international organizations with the intent to obtain or retain business or seek a business advantage.


Federal Trade Commission ("FTC")- This agency oversees the advertising and other promotional practices of consumer products marketers. The FTC considers whether a product’s claims are substantiated, truthful and not misleading. The FTC also reviews mergers and acquisitions of companies exceeding specified thresholds and investigates certain business practices relevant to the healthcare industry.


International Organization for Standardization ("ISO") - The ISO Standards specify requirements for a Quality Management System that demonstrates the ability to consistently provide products that meet customer and applicable regulatory standards and includes processes to ensure continuous improvement. Our infant formula manufacturing sites are ISO 9001-2008 Certified for Quality Management Systems. ISO inspections are conducted at least annually.

19

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Regulation


United States PharmacopeialPharmacopoeia Convention, Inc. ("USP") - The USP is a non-governmental, standard-setting organization. By reference, the FFDCA incorporates the USP quality and testing standards and monographs as the standard that must be met for the listed drugs, unless compliance with those standards is specifically disclaimed on the product’s labeling. USP standards exist for most Rx and OTC pharmaceuticals and many nutritional supplements. The FDA typically requires USP compliance as part of cGMP compliance.


Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ("HIPAA") - HIPAA is a set of regulations designed to protect personal information and data collected and stored in medical records. It established a national standard to be used in all doctors' offices, hospitals and other businesses where personal medical information is stored. In addition to protecting personal medical information, HIPAA also gives patients the right to view their medical records and request changes if the data is incorrect. We could be subject to criminal penalties if we knowingly obtain individually identifiable health information from a covered entity in a manner that is not authorized or permitted by HIPAA or for aiding and abetting the violation of HIPAA.


Consumer Product Safety Commission ("CPSC") - The CPSC has published regulations requiring child resistant packaging on certain products including pharmaceuticals and dietary supplements. The manufacturer of any product that is subject to any CPSC rule, ban, standard or regulation must certify that, based on a reasonable testing program, the product complies with CPSC requirements.


Anti-Bribery LawsCalifornia Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act ("Prop 65") - Various jurisdictionsProp 65 is a toxic right-to-know warnings law that allows the state attorney general and private enforcers to sue on behalf of the public claiming the products in question sold in California violate the law by exposing consumers to chemicals in levels above those allowed by regulation without carrying warnings.

California Consumer Privacy Act ("CCPA") - CCPA went into effective on January 1, 2020, which enhanced the data protection rights of residents in California. This law increases our responsibility and potential liability related to personal data of California residents that we operate have laws and regulations, including the U.K. Bribery Act 2010, aimed at preventing and penalizing corrupt and anticompetitive behavior.
process.


Other State Agencies - We are subject to regulation by numerous other state health departments, insurance departments, boards of pharmacy, state controlled substance agencies, state consumer health and safety regulations, and other comparable state agencies, each of which have license requirements and fees that vary by state.


Regulation Outside the U.S.


We develop and manufacture products and market third-party manufactured products in regions outside the U.S., including Eastern and Western Europe, Israel,Canada, Mexico, Australia, countries in Asia, South America, and the Middle East, each of which has its own regulatory environment. The majority of our sales outside the U.S. are in the following categories: OTC/RxOTC pharmaceuticals, infant formulas, medical devices, dietary supplements, cosmetics, biocides and cosmetics.oral care products. Other regulatory agencies, organizations and legislation that may impact our business include, but are not limited to:


Privacy Regulations - We are subject to numerous global laws and regulations designed to protect personal data, such as the European Union Directive on Data Protection (which will be replaced by the European Union General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) from May 2018 onward). The GDPR will introduceintroduced more stringent data protection requirements in the European Union ("EU"),EU, as well as substantial fines for breaches of the data protection rules. The GDPR will increaseincreased our responsibility and potential liability in relation to personal data that we process, and we may be required tohave put in place additionalappropriate mechanisms to ensure compliancecomply with the GDPR.


Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Regulation


Transparency Laws - In various jurisdictions in which we operate, we are subject to the laws and regulations aimed at increasing transparency of financial relationships between healthcare professionals and pharmaceutical/medical device manufacturers. These acts require certain pharmaceutical manufacturers to engage in extensive tracking of payments or transfers of value to healthcare professionals.

Anti-Bribery Laws - Various jurisdictions in which we operate have laws and regulations, including the U.K. Bribery Act 2010 and the Irish Criminal Justice (Corruption Offenses) Act 2018, aimed at preventing and penalizing corrupt and anticompetitive behavior.
20

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Regulation



Rules and Regulations Infant Formula - Outside of the U.S., country-specific regulations define the requirements that we must comply with regarding the manufacturing, testing, labeling, packaging, storage, distribution, and promotion of infant formula. We are subject to ongoing periodic inspection through these complex regulations, including by the FDA and other regulatory agencies such as the Canadian Food Inspection Agency ("CFIA").

European Union


On July 14, 2021, the European Commission adopted a set of proposals to ensure polices are aligned with the goal of reducing net greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030 – the EU Green Deal. There is a growing focus on environmental impact of self-care products, their ingredients, components, packaging, manufacturing, and disposal. This focus could lead to new requirements and restrictions in the coming years across all product categories described below.

OTC and Rx Pharmaceuticals


The European pharmaceutical industry is highly regulated and much of the legislative and regulatory framework is driven by the European Parliament and the European Commission. This has many benefits, including the potential to harmonize standards across the complex European market. However, obtaining regulatory agreement across member states presents complex challenges that can lead to delays in the regulatory process.


In the EU, as well as many other locations around the world, the manufacture and sale of medicinal products are regulated in a manner substantially similar to that of the U.S. requirements, which generally prohibit the handling, manufacture, marketing, and importation of any medicinal product unless it is properly registered in accordance with applicable law. The registration file relating to any particular product must contain data related to product efficacy and safety, including results of clinical testing and/or references to medical publications, as well as detailed information regarding production methods and quality control. Health ministries are authorized to cancel the registration of a product if it is found to be harmful or ineffective or if it is manufactured or marketed other than in accordance with registration conditions.


The legislation governing the European pharmaceutical industry is subject to an ongoing consultation and extensive review. Updates to the existing pharmaceutical law are anticipated to be implemented in 2023. These updates could bring opportunity in terms of increased flexibility in some areas but also risk as certain aspects of the law are made more restrictive.

Between 1995 and 1998, the over-arching regulation that governs medicinal products was revised in an attempt to simplify and harmonize product registration. This revised legislation introduced the mutual recognition procedure (“MRP”), whereby after approval of a marketing authorization by regulatory authorities in the reference member state (“RMS”), additional marketing authorizations could be submitted to other concerned member states to obtain a product license. In November 2005, the medicinal product legislation was further revised to introduce the decentralized procedure (“DCP”), whereby marketing authorizations are submitted simultaneously to the RMS and select concerned member states. In 2005, the EMA also opened up the centralized procedure to sponsors of marketing authorizations for generic medicinal products. Unlike the MRP and DCP, the centralized procedure results in a single marketing authorization and product labeling across all member states that will allow a sponsor to file for individual country reimbursement and make the medicine available in all the EU countries listed on the application. Marketing authorizations and subsequent product licenses are granted to applicants only after the relevant health authority issues a positive assessment of quality, safety and efficacy of the product.


In addition to obtaining marketing authorization for each product, all member states require that a manufacturer’s facilities obtain approval from an EU Regulatory Authority. The EU has a code of GMP that each manufacturer must follow and comply with. Regulatory authorities in the EU may conduct inspections of the manufacturing facilities to review procedures, operating systems and personnel qualifications. We believe that our policies, operations and products comply in all material respects with existing regulations to which our operations are subject.
In 2011, it was first proposed that the EU Member States had to transposetransition to the European Falsified Medicines Directive (the “Directive”). The Directive was subsequently written into national law byon January 2, 2013. The transposition process is now complete.Directive made reference to a Delegated Act (the Delegated Act lists the detailed requirements for
21

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Regulation

manufacturers). The Delegated Act was finalized and published in February 2017, and it provided for a two-year implementation period. We are in compliance with the Delegated Act. The provisions of the Directive are intended to reduce the risk of counterfeit medicines entering the supply chain and also to ensure the quality of API manufactured outside of the EU. The Directive required the serialization of all Rx and some OTC products, similar to the DSCSA in the U.S.
InThe European Commission passed legislation requiring new product packaging ‘safety features’ to prevent falsification of medicinal products primarily within the prescription medicines sector. All marketing authorization holders in the EU member states regulateand EEA members Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Switzerland were required to introduce the pricingnecessary changes by February 9, 2019 (or risk forfeiting their product licenses). However, manufacturers based out of prescription medicinal products,Greece, Belgium and in some cases,Italy have an extended timeline until February 9, 2025 to implement the formulation and dosing of products. This regulation is handled by individual member state national health services. These individual regulatory bodies can result in considerable price differences and product availability among member states. The implementation of tendering systems for the pricing of pharmaceuticals in several countries generally impactsserialization guidelines as they already feature similar requirements on their current drug pricing for generics; generally “tendering” refers to a system that requires bids to be submitted to the government by competing manufacturers to be the exclusive, or one of a few, suppliers of a product in a particular country.packages.
Data exclusivity provisions exist in many countries, although the application is not uniform. In general, these exclusivity provisions prevent the approval and/or submission of generic drug applications to the health authorities
Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Regulation


for a fixed period of time following the first approval of the brand-name product in that country. As these exclusivity provisions operate independently of patent exclusivity, they may prevent the submission of generic drug applications for some products even after the patent protection has expired.

The requirements deriving from European pharmacovigilance regulation are constantly expanding due to increasing guidance on good vigilance practices and increased communication on inspectors’ expectations. Pharmacovigilance fee regulation became effective in late 2014 to support health authority assessment of pharmacovigilance safety evaluation reports, study protocols for post authorization safety studies and referrals. Once approved, the advertising of pharmaceuticals in the EU is governed by national regulations and guidelines. Within certain member states this is overseen by a self-certification process whereas in others national governance bodies approve material prior to release.


The wholesale distribution of medicinal productschannel is an important activity in the integrated supply chain management.management for medical products. The quality and the integrity of medicinal products can be affected by a lack of adequate control. To this end, the EU Commission has published guidelines on Good Distribution Practice of medicinal productsMedicinal Products for human useHuman Use in 2013. The present guidelines are based on Articles 84 and 85b(3) of medicinal products for human use directive.


Medical Devices


The EU has enacted into law numerous directives and adopted many harmonizing standards pertaining to a wide range of industrial products, including medical devices. Medical devices that comply with the requirements of applicable directives are entitled to bear the CE marking of conformity, which indicates that the device conforms to the applicable requirements of the directives and, accordingly, can be commercially distributed throughout Europe. The method of assessing conformity varies depending on the class of the product, but normally involves a combination of self-assessment by the manufacturer and a third-party assessment by a Notified Body, an organization accredited by a member state. Assessment by a Notified Body includes an audit of the manufacturer’s quality system and may also include specific testing of the product. This assessment is a prerequisite for a manufacturer to commercially distribute the product throughout the EU. On May 25, 2017, the EU’s Medical Device Regulation (the “MDR”) became effective, with a three year transitional period until full application. The date of application of the MDR, and as a result the date of repeal of the existing Medical Device Directives (the "MDDs"), was deferred by 12 months to May 26, 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. All Class I (low risk) medical devices needed to comply with the MDR by May 26, 2021, and all medical devices sold in the EU will need to be approved under the MDR by May 26, 2025. Notified Bodies, which are organizations accredited by a member state, were able to approve medical devices under the MDDs until May 26, 2021. Beginning on May 27, 2021, Notified Bodies are no longer able to approve new medical devices under the MDDs or approve notifications of “substantial” design changes, including changes to labeling/packaging, changes to the manufacturing process, or the addition of new features and functionality, to medical devices that were approved under the MDDs.


Only Notified Bodies that have been designated under the MDR can carry out conformity assessment procedures, and only for certain types of devices listed by the product codes in their designation. This designation process is a lengthy and costly process, resulting in a shortage of certified notified bodies, which has created bottlenecks due to an insufficient number of designated Notified Bodies and trained personnel, constraining the availability of medical devices. Stricter guidelines for substance-based devices (classification rules; interpretation of the definitions of pharmacological, immunological, or metabolic means) under the MDR are expected.
22

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Regulation


We can expect possible divergence on the medical device regulatory framework from non-EU markets such as the UK after Brexit. In addition, in 2021, the mutual recognition agreement between EU and Switzerland on medical devices has ceased.

Dietary Supplements


Complying with the legislative framework for dietary supplements in the EU remains challenging as a result of changing EU regulations, diverging national regulations from EU regulations, and diverging regulations between EU member states.

Dietary supplements are subject to several regulations that inform the selection of ingredient levels and how products can be described on packaging and in advertising. These regulations include: Food Supplements Directive 2002/46/EC, Food Information to Consumers Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011, Permitted Vitamins and Minerals Regulation (EC) 1170/2009, Food Additives Regulation (EC) 1333/2008, Nutritional & Health Claims Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, the Foods Intended for Particular Nutritional Uses Directive 2009/39/EC, and Regulation (EU) 609/2013.


EU rules on nutrition and health claims, which were established by Regulation EC 1924/2006, apply to any nutritional or health claim by a manufacturer. The objective of the regulation is to ensure that claims made in food labeling or advertising are clear, accurate and based on scientific evidence. The European Food Safety Authority, an advisory panel to the European Commission, performs all scientific assessments of health claims on food and supplement labels. An EU register of nutrition and health claims exists to document approved, pending, and rejected claims.


Increased scrutiny from the EU Commission is likely to result in further ingredient reviews that could trigger additional market measures and reformulations. Ingredients under growing scrutiny, such as nanomaterials and food additives, are likely to be subject to review and stricter measures, as well as their use in certain vulnerable population groups.

Cosmetics


Cosmetic products in the EU market must comply with Regulation EC No. 1223/2009. This regulation requires manufacturers to prepare a product safety report prior to placing a cosmetic product in the market. In addition, for each cosmetic product placed in the market, a “responsible person” must be designated to oversee compliance with the regulation’s reporting requirements. Commission Regulation EU No. 655/2013 establishes the common criteria and justification for claims to be used in the packaging and advertising of cosmetics products. A revision of the existing regulation is currently under consultation and is expected to be implemented by the end of 2022. It is anticipated that additional restriction criteria would be included in the revised regulation, thus expanding the scope of ingredients that could have their use in cosmetics restricted.


Increased scrutiny from the EU Commission is likely to result in further ingredient reviews that could trigger additional market measures and reformulations. Reviews are also likely in relation to the EU Green Deal (as defined below) a review regarding microplastics is ongoing as well as ingredients in sunscreens, endocrine disruptors, nanomaterials, and skin sensitisers.

Biocides

Biocides in the EU market must comply with Regulation EU No. 528/2012 ("EU BPR") overseen by the European Chemicals Agency. Contrary to medicines, biocides are not exempted from chemical legislation such as the Regulation on Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals No. 1907/2006 and the Regulation on Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation of substances and mixtures EC No. 1272/2008. The EU BPR improves the functioning of the biocidal products market in the EU, while ensuring a high level of protection for humans and the environment through the implementation of a harmonized system at Union level. Biocides are currently transitioning from a national-based system to a European system. The transition involves the gradual integration and approval or re-approval of existing active substances, followed by the pre-market authorization of biocidal finished products. This means all biocidal products will need to complete the reauthorization process, with the assessment focusing on efficacy and safety of the biocides on the European market.

23

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1

Regulation


General Product Safety Directive
Employees

The General Product Safety Directive (2001/95/EC) complements sector-specific legislation such as rules that apply to electrical and electronic goods, chemicals, and other specific product groups. Together, the General Product Safety Directive and sector specific legislation ensure the safety and traceability of products in the market (other than pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and food which are regulated under separate legislation). If our products fail to meet the General Product Safety Directive, we may incur fines.
As
The current directive is due to be repealed and replaced with a regulation with additional and stricter requirements for products being placed on the EU market. Publication is expected in 2022 and entry would likely become effective six months after publication. It is anticipated that the changes to be introduced by the Regulation will affect products in the Oral care category.

Additional Global Regulations and Considerations

We must comply with a variety of U.S. laws related to doing business outside of the U.S., including but not limited to, Office of Foreign Asset Controls; United Nations and EU sanctions; the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012; rules relating to the use of certain “conflict minerals” under Section 1502 of the Dodd- Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act; and regulations enforced by the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol. Changes in laws, regulations, and practices affecting the pharmaceutical industry and the healthcare system, including imports, exports, manufacturing, quality, cost, pricing, reimbursement, approval, inspection, and delivery of healthcare, may affect our business and operations. International sanctions and boycotts of our products could also impact our sales and ability to export our products.

In recent years, there has been growing concern about the use and misuse of opioids and related products in the United States and around the world. Natural and synthetic opioids have analgesic and sedative effects, and are commonly prescribed by medical professionals for the temporary management of pain. Clinically weaker opioid analgesics, such as products containing codeine, are available from pharmacists in certain jurisdictions without a doctor’s prescription. However, a number of jurisdictions have implemented or are considering restrictions on OTC products containing codeine. For example, in 2018, Australia reclassified codeine to require a prescription, and regulators in Ireland and the UK may be evaluating similar actions. Certain formulations of the branded pain medications we sell in certain non-U.S. jurisdictions contain codeine. Restrictions or prohibitions on the sale of OTC products containing codeine could affect our CSCI segment in future periods.

Tax Regulations

Recent Changes to Tax Laws, Regulations and Related Interpretations

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”), which represents a coalition of member countries, has recommended changes to numerous long-standing tax principles relating to Base Erosion and Profit Shifting ("BEPS"). These changes are being adopted and implemented by many of the countries in which we do business and may increase our tax expense in these countries. Building on the first BEPS project, the OECD began a new project in 2019, which has evolved into a two Pillar approach to address the pressure put on the current international tax system due to digitalization and globalization. The current project, referred to as BEPS 2.0, is being conducted through the G20/OECD Inclusive Framework, which now counts 141 participating countries. Pillar One of the project focuses on development of new nexus and profit allocation rules to assign more taxing rights to market countries. Pillar Two focuses on development of new global minimum tax rules. On December 20, 2021, the OECD released the Model Rules on Pillar Two Global Minimum Tax. Implementation of the Model Rules will lead to significant changes to the overall international tax rules under which companies operate. The new rules will subject large multinational corporations to a global minimum corporation tax of 15% and introduce new filing obligations that will impose onerous data gathering requirements and additional internal reporting processes and systems. On December 22, 2021, the European Commission issued a draft Directive to implement Pillar 2 in the European Union. The Commission proposes that the Directive be finalized by mid-2022 and transposed into domestic law of the member states to be effective January 1, 2023.

On March 27, 2020, the U.S. enacted the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”). The CARES Act allowed for an increased interest expense limitation and depreciation deductions resulting in a reduction of income tax expense of approximately $36.6 million for tax years 2019 and 2020. Additionally, Treasury and the IRS issued Proposed and Final Regulations in 2020 regarding interest expense limitations under Section 163(j). These regulations adjust the definition of interest expense and items allowable in adjusted taxable
24

Perrigo Company plc - Item 1
Regulation

income to calculate the annual interest deduction limitation. Perrigo applied the updated regulations resulting in a reduction of income tax expense of approximately $8.9 million during 2020.

On December 28, 2021, the U.S. Treasury and the IRS released final foreign tax credit regulations addressing various aspects of the foreign tax credit (“FTC”) regime. These regulations finalize, among other guidance, provisions relating to the disallowance of a credit or deduction for foreign income taxes with respect to dividends eligible for a dividends-received deduction; the allocation and apportionment of interest expense, foreign income tax expense; the definition of a foreign income tax and a tax in lieu of an income tax; transition rules relating to the impact on loss accounts of net operating loss carrybacks; the definition of foreign branch category income; and the time at which foreign taxes accrue and can be claimed as a credit. The regulations also contain clarifying rules relating to foreign-derived intangible income (FDII). These regulations are, generally, effective on March 7, 2022, with some provisions having retroactive effect. For the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, we had approximately 10,400 full-timeevaluated whether these final FTC regulations would have any effect on our income tax reporting for the year ended December 31, 2021, and temporary employees worldwide,applicable prior periods, and concluded that these final FTC regulations do not result in any material changes to our income tax reporting for the year ended December 31, 2021 or for any prior periods. We will continue to evaluate the effects of which approximately 24% were coveredthese final FTC regulations on future accounting periods.

Foreign Incorporation Considerations

Although we are incorporated in Ireland, the IRS may not agree with the conclusion that we are treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. federal tax purposes. For Perrigo Company plc to be treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. federal tax purposes under section 7874 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), either (i) the former stockholders of Perrigo Company must own (within the meaning of section 7874 of the Code) less than 80% (by both vote and value) of our stock by collective bargaining agreements.reason of holding shares in Perrigo Company (the "ownership test") as of the closing of the Elan acquisition or (ii) we must have substantial business activities in Ireland after the Elan acquisition (taking into account the activities of our expanded affiliated group). Upon our acquisition of Elan, Perrigo Company stockholders held 71% (by both vote and value) of our shares. We considerbelieve that under current law, we should be treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. federal tax purposes. However, we cannot assure that the IRS will agree with our employee relations generally satisfactory.position that the ownership test is satisfied. There is limited guidance regarding the section 7874 provisions, including the application of the ownership test. Based on the limited guidance available, we currently expect that Section 7874 of the Code likely will limit our and our U.S. affiliates’ ability to use their U.S. tax attributes, such as net operating losses, to offset certain U.S. taxable income, if any, generated by the Elan acquisition or certain specified transactions for a period of time following the Elan acquisition. Refer to Item 8. Note 17.


Available Information


Our principal executive offices are located at TreasuryThe Sharp Building, Lower Grand Canal Street,Hogan Place, Dublin 2, Ireland,D02 TY74, and our North American base of operations is located at 515 Eastern Avenue, Allegan, Michigan 49010. Our telephone number is +353 1 7094000. Our website address is www.perrigo.com, where we make available free of charge our reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, including any amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). These filings are also available to the public at www.sec.gov and www.isa.gov.il.


ITEM 1A.
ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS

Risks Related to Operations

SUMMARY OF RISK FACTORS

Operational Risks

We face vigorous competition from other pharmaceutical and consumer packaged goods companies, thatwhich may threaten the commercial acceptancedemand for and pricing of our products.
If we do not continue to develop, manufacture, and market innovative products, introduce new line extensions, and expand into adjacent categories that meet customer demands, our net sales may be negatively impacted and we may lose market share.
We operate in highly regulated industries, and any inability to timely meet current or future regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.
Limitations on reimbursement, continuing healthcare reforms, and changes to reimbursement methods in the United States and other countries may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.
25

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors
If we fail to comply with the reporting and payment obligations under the Medicaid rebate program or other governmental purchasing and rebate programs, we could be subject to fines or penalties, which could be material.
Unfavorable publicity or consumer perception of the safety, quality, and efficacy of our products could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Lack of availability, or significant increases in the cost, of raw materials used in manufacturing our products could have a material adverse effect on our profit margins and operating results.
The COVID-19 global pandemic and the public health and governmental actions in response continues to have an adverse impact on our operations and could have an adverse impact on our business and financial condition in the future.
Disruption of our supply chain, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, could have an adverse effect on our businesses, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
A disruption at any of our main manufacturing facilities could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, and results of operations.
Our business could be negatively affected by the performance of our collaboration partners and suppliers, and any such adverse impact could be material.
Our business depends upon certain customers for a significant portion of our sales, therefore our business would be adversely affected by a disruption of our relationship with these customers or any material adverse change in these customers' businesses. The risk of such impacts would be increased by continued consolidation in the sector in which our customers operate.
Our businesses could be adversely affected by deteriorating economic conditions in the countries in which we operate, and our results may be volatile due to these or other circumstances beyond our control.
A cyber security breach, disruption or misuse of our information systems, or our external business partners’ information systems could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We are dependent on the services of certain key personnel.
Management transition creates uncertainties, and any difficulties we experience in managing such transitions may negatively impact our business.

Strategic Risks

We may not realize the benefits of business acquisitions, divestitures, and other strategic transactions, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
We have acquired significant assets that could become impaired or subject us to losses and may result in an adverse impact on our results of operations.
There can be no assurance that our strategic initiatives will achieve their intended effects.

Global Risks

Our business, financial condition, and results of operations are subject to risks arising from the international scope of our operations.
We operate in jurisdictions that could be affected by economic and geopolitical instability, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
The international scope of our business exposes us to risks associated with foreign exchange rates.

Litigation and Insurance Risks

We are or may become involved in lawsuits and may experience unfavorable outcomes of such proceedings.
Increased scrutiny on pricing practices and competition in the pharmaceutical industry, including antitrust enforcement activity by government agencies and class action litigation, may have an adverse impact on our business and operating results.
Third-party patents and other intellectual property rights may limit our ability to bring new products to market and may subject us to potential legal liability, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.
The success of certain of our products depends on the effectiveness of measures we take to protect our intellectual property rights and patents.
Our ability to achieve operating results in line with published guidance is inherently subject to numerous risks and other factors beyond our control. Publishing earnings guidance subjects us to risks, including increased stock volatility, that could lead to potential lawsuits by investors.
26

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors
Significant increases in the cost or decreases in the availability of the insurance we maintain could adversely impact our operating results and financial condition. Disputes with insurers on the scope of existing policies may limit the coverage available under such policies.

Tax Related Risks

The resolution of uncertain tax positions, including the Notices of Proposed Adjustments and ongoing disputes with U.S. and foreign tax authorities, could be unfavorable, which could have an adverse effect on our business.
Changes to tax laws and regulations or the interpretation thereof could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and the ability to utilize cash in a tax efficient manner.
Our effective tax rate or cash tax payment requirements may change in the future, which could adversely impact our future results of operations.

Capital and Liquidity Risks

Our indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to implement our strategic initiatives.
We cannot guarantee that we will buy back our ordinary shares pursuant to our announced share repurchase plan or that our share repurchase plan will enhance long-term shareholder value.
Any additional shares we may issue could dilute your ownership in the Company.
We are incorporated in Ireland; Irish law differs from the laws in effect in the United States and may afford less protection to, or otherwise adversely affect, our shareholders.
We may be limited in our ability to pay dividends in the future.

Operational Risks

We face competition from other pharmaceutical and consumer packaged goods companies, which may threaten the demand for and pricing of our products.


We operate in a highly competitive environment. Our Perrigo-branded products compete against store brand, generic, and branded pharmaceuticals. Competition is also impacted by changes in regulationshealth and governmentwellness products. In addition, our products sold under labels of others (store brand) compete against other store brands, generic, and branded health and wellness products. If we or our store brand customers are unable to compete successfully, our business may lose customers or face negative pricing programs that may give competitors an advantage.pressures. In particular:


As a manufacturer of generic versions of brand-name drugs through our CHCAOur CSCA and RXCSCI segments we experience direct competition from brand-nameother drug companies, including brand name companies, that may try to prevent, discourage or delay the use of generic versionsour products through various measures, including introduction of new branded products, legislative initiatives, changing dosage forms or dosing regimens, regulatory processes, filing new patents or patent extensions, lawsuits, citizens’ petitions, and attempts to generate negative publicity prior to our introduction of a genericnew competitive product. In addition, brand-name competitorsMoreover, other companies may lower their prices to compete with generic products, increase advertising, or launch, either through an affiliate or licensing arrangements with another company, an authorized generic at or near the time the first generic product is launched, depriving the generic product potential market exclusivity.

Our CHCA and RX segments may experience increased price competition as other generic companies produce the same product,products as us, sometimes forsold at dramatically lower margins in order to gain market share. Other generic companies may also introduce new drugs and/or drug delivery techniques that make our current products less desirable. A drug may be subject
The FDA's increasing acceptance of in vitro studies, rather than human clinical studies, to competition from alternative therapies during the periodsupport bioequivalence of patent protection or regulatory exclusivity, and thereafter, we may be subject to further competition from generic products or biosimilars.
may lead to increased production of products that compete with Perrigo's generic product portfolio.

The pharmaceutical industry is consolidating. This creates larger competitors and places further pressure on prices, development activities, and customer retention. Our animal health category within the CHCA segment has seen an increase in direct to consumer advertising by several branded competitors, which may increase in the future, and our nutritionals category has experienced increased competition through alternative channels such as health food stores, direct mail and direct sales.

We develop and distribute branded products primarily through our CHCI segment. We experience competition from other brand-name drug companies, many of which are larger and have more resources to devote to advertising and marketing. These direct competitors may be able to adapt more quickly to changes in customer requirements. Our current and future competitors mayrequirements or develop products comparable or superior to those offered by us at more competitive prices.

Competition in the pharmaceutical space may also be impacted by changes in regulations and government pricing programs that may give certain competitors an advantage.

27

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

Our CHCA and RX segments also experience competition from our generic competitors, some of whom are significantly larger than we are, who may develop their products more rapidly or complete regulatory approval processes sooner, or may market their products earlier than we do.

If we are unable to compete successfully, our business will be harmed through loss of customers or increased negative pricing pressure that would adversely affect our ability to generate revenue and adversely affect our operating results.

If we do not continue to develop, manufacture, and market innovative products, introduce new line extensions, and expand into adjacent categories that meet customer demands, we may lose market share and our net sales may be negatively impacted.impacted and we may lose market share.


Our continuedThe growth of our business is due in large part to our ability to develop, manufacture, and market products that meet customer requirements for quality, safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness. Continuous introductionscost-effectiveness. Margins for existing products tend to decline over time due to aging product life cycles, changes in consumer preferences, pricing pressure from customers, and increased competition. Accordingly, our business model relies heavily on the continuous introduction of newinnovative products and new product categories are critical to our business.categories. If we do not continue to develop, manufacture, and market new products, we could lose market share, and our net sales may be negatively impacted. See Item 1. Business - Research and Development for more information.

We maintain a diversified product line to function as a primary supplier for our customers. Capital investments are driven by growth, technological advancements, cost improvement and the need for manufacturing flexibility. Our future capital expenditures could vary materially due to the uncertainty of these factors. In addition,or if we fail to stay current with the latest manufacturing information, and packaging technology, we may be unable to competitively support the launch of new product introductions.

Our product margins may decline over time due to our products' aging life cycles, changes in consumer choice, changes in competition for our existing products, or the introduction of next generation innovative products; therefore, new product introductions are necessary to maintain our current financial condition. If we are unable to continue to create new products, we maycould lose market share, or experience pricing pressure, and our net sales may be negatively impacted.affected.


We must prove that the regulated generic drug products in our CHCA and RX segments are bioequivalent to their branded counterparts, which may require bioequivalence studies, and in the case of topical products, even more extensive clinical endpoint trials to demonstrate their efficacy. The development and commercialization process, particularly with respect to innovative products, is both time consuming and costly, and subject to a high degree of business risk. Products currently under development may require re-design to meet evolving FDAregulatory standards, may not perform as expected, may not pass required bioequivalence studies, or may be the subject of intellectual property challenges. Necessary regulatory approvals may not be obtained in a timely manner, if at all. Any of these events may negatively impact our net sales.

Even if we are successful in developing a product, our customers' failure to launch one of our products successfully, or delays in manufacturing developed products, could adversely affect our operating results. In addition, the FDA or similar regulatory agency couldagencies may impose higher standards andor additional requirements, as a condition to clearing new products, such as requiring more supporting data and clinical data than previously required, in order to gain regulatory clearance to launch new formulations into the market, which could negatively impact our future net sales.
Our CHCA and CHCI segments are impacted by changes in consumer preferences. If In our CSCA segment, we are unable to adapt to these changes, we may lose market share and our net sales may be negatively impacted.

While the market for store brand products has grown in recent years, there can be no assurancemust prove that the paceregulated generic drug products are bioequivalent to their branded counterparts, which may require bioequivalence studies, and, in the case of this growth will continue. Consumer preferences relatedtopical products, even more extensive clinical endpoint trials to healthdemonstrate their efficacy, and nutritional concerns may change, whichthe failure to do so could negatively impact demand for our CHCA and CHCI products or cause us to incur additional costs to change our products or product packaging.

The future growth and stability of U.S. store brand market share will be impacted, in part, by general economic conditions, which can influence consumers to switch to and from store brand products. Our CHCA segment sales could be negatively affected if economic conditions improve and consumers return to purchasing higher-priced brand-name products. Conversely, while store brand products present an
Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

alternative to higher-priced branded products, if economic conditions deteriorate, our CHCA segment sales could be negatively impacted if consumers forgo obtaining healthcare or reduce their healthcare spending.

Our CHCI segment's success is dependent on the continued growth in demand for its lifestyle products, which include weight-loss products and various dietary supplements. If demand for these products decreases, our CHCI segment's results of operations would be negatively impacted.

Our CHCA customers may request changes in packaging to meet consumer demands, which could cause us to incur inventory obsolescence charges and redesign costs, which in turn wouldalso negatively impact our CHCA segment's results of operations.
sales.

Our infant formula product category within our CHCA segment is subject to changing consumer preferences and health and nutrition-related concerns. Our business depends, in part, on consumer preferences and choices, including the number of mothers who choose to use infant formula products rather than breastfeed their babies. To the extent that private, public, and government sources may promote the benefits of breastfeeding over the use of infant formula, there could be a reduced demand for infant formula products. We could also be adversely impacted by an increase in the number of families that are provided with infant formula by the U.S. federal government through the Women, Infants and Children program, as we do not participate in this program.

We operate in highly regulated industries, and any inability to timely meet current or future regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business financial position, and operating results.


We operate in highly regulated industries in numerous countries and are subject to the regulations of a variety of U.S. and non-U.S. agencies related to the manufacturing, processing, formulation, packaging, labeling, testing, storing, distribution, import, export, advertising, and sale (including cost, pricing and reimbursement) of our products, as described in detail in Item 1. Business - Government Regulation and Pricing. Government regulationChanges in laws, regulations, and practices in the marketscountries in which we operate, impactswhich may be impacted by political pressure and other factors outside of our business,control, may be difficult or expensive for us to comply with, could restrict or delay our ability to manufacture, distribute, sell or market our products, and may adversely affect our revenue, operating results, and financial condition or impose significant administrative burdens. Divergence in regulatory approach from country to country, and between the EU and individual member states, adds cost and complexity to the compliance framework; and differences in requirements and/or implementation dates in different jurisdictions may provide competitive advantages to manufacturers that operate in other locations. If our products fail to meet regulatory requirements, our sales may be adversely affected, we may incur fines and penalties, and our future results could be materially adversely affected by changes in such regulations or policies.exposure to liability relating to product-based claims may increase. Below are some examples of the ways in which government regulationregulatory risk may impact us:

As described in Item 1. Business - Government Regulation and Pricing, on July 14, 2021, the European Commission adopted a set of proposals to ensure polices are aligned with the goal of reducing net greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030 (the "EU Green Deal"). There is a growing focus on environmental impact of self-care products, their ingredients, components, packaging, manufacturing, and disposal. This focus could impact our business and/or financial results:lead to new requirements and restrictions in the coming years across all product categories.

We must obtain approval from the appropriate regulatory agencies in order to manufacture and sell our products in the regions in which we operate. Obtaining this approval can be time consuming and costly. ThereWhen we submit an application for market authorization, there can be no assurance that in the event we submit anregulator will approve that application for a marketing authorization to any global regulatory agency, we will obtain the approval to market a product and/or that we will obtain it on a timely basis. Laws unique to the basis or at all.
U.S. regulatory framework encouragelaw encourages generic competition by providing eligibility for first generic marketing exclusivity if certain conditions are met. If we are granted generic exclusivity, the exclusivity may be shared with other generic OTC companies, including authorized generics; or it is possible that we may forfeit 180-day exclusivity if we do notfail to obtain regulatory approval orand begin marketing the product within the statutory requirements. Finally, ifIf we are not the first to file our ANDA, the FDA may grant 180-day exclusivity to another company, thereby effectively delaying the launch of our product and/or possibly reducing our market share.

28

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors
Global regulatory agencies regularly inspect our manufacturing facilities and the facilities of our third-party suppliers. The failure of one of ourthese facilities or a facility of one of our third-party suppliers, to comply with applicable laws and regulations may lead to a breach of representations made to our customers, or to regulatory or government action against us related to the products made in that facility. Such action could includefacility, including suspension of or delay in regulatory approvals. If the compliance violations are severe, agencies of the government may initiateapprovals and product seizure, injunction, recall, suspension of production or distribution of our products, loss of certain licenses or other governmental penalties, or civil or criminal prosecution, thereby impactingwhich could result in increased cost, lost revenue, or reputational damage.
In 2020, regulatory agencies globally, including the reputation of allFDA and EMA, issued guidance on assessing and controlling nitrosamine impurities in medicine products. We are continuing to undertake a review of our products.product portfolio in accordance with regulatory guidance to assess the risk of the presence of nitrosamine impurities. Any finding of nitrosamine impurities exceeding levels set by regulatory authorities may require us to adopt modified product sourcing and/or manufacturing processes or to initiate product withdrawal.

In the U.S., the DSCSA requires development of an electronic pedigree to track and trace each prescription drug at the salable unit level through the distribution system, which will be effective incrementally over a 10-year period beginning on January 1, 2015, for manufacturers, wholesale distributors, and re-packagers, and on July 1, 2015 for dispensers. Similarly, the European Commission passed legislation requiring new product packaging ‘safety features’ to prevent falsification of medicinal products primarily within the
Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

prescription medicines sector. The act was adopted February 9, 2016. EU member states (with the exception of Belgium, Italy and Greece), and EEA members Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Switzerland must be in compliance within three years, or by February 9, 2019.  Belgium, Italy, and Greece have until February 9, 2025 to comply. Marketing Authorization holders will have three years from the publication date to implement the necessary changes or risk forfeiting their product licenses. Compliance with the new U.S. and EU electronic pedigree requirements may increase our operational expenses and impose significant administrative burdens.

Global regulatory agencies highly scrutinize any product application submitted to switch a product from physician prescribed Rx to unsupervised OTC use by the general public. The expansion of Rx-to-OTC switches isare critical to our future growth. Reluctance ofIf regulatory agencies fail to approve Rx-to-OTC switches in new product categories or reassess the terms of existing OTC classifications, our growth prospects and product mix would be impaired. Further, regulatory agencies may reassess the terms of OTC classification if they perceive a shift in the previously assessed benefit/risk profile. Any such reassessment could impact that growth.lead to OTC products reverting to prescription.

Our infant formula products may be subject to barriers or sanctions imposed by countries or international organizations limiting international trade and dictating the specific content of infant formulasuch products. Governments couldIf governments enhance regulations on the infant formula industry aimed at ensuring the safety and quality of dairy products, including, but not limited to,by, for example, requiring additional testing or compulsory batch-by-batch inspection, our sales and testing for additional safety and quality issues. Such inspections and testing may increase our operating costs related to infant formula products.margins in this category could be adversely affected.

If we are unable to successfully obtain the necessary quota for controlled substances andThe regulation of List I chemicals we risk having delayed product launches or failing to meet commercialcomplicate our supply obligations. If we are unable to comply with regulatory requirements for controlled substanceschain, and List I chemicals, the DEA, or similar regulatory agency, may takeadverse regulatory actions resultingmay result in temporary or permanent interruption of distribution of our products, withdrawal of our products from the market, or other penalties. If we are unable to obtain necessary quotas for List I chemicals, we risk having delayed product launches or failing to meet commercial supply obligations.

In order to commercially distribute ourAs described in Item 1. Government Regulation and Pricing, beginning on May 26, 2025, all medical device productsdevices sold in the EU theywill need to conformbe approved under the MDR, with certain device categories requiring compliance sooner, and there is currently a shortage in the requirementsnumber of applicable EU directives. The method of assessingNotified Bodies authorized to carry out conformity varies depending on the class of the product, but normally involves a combination of self-assessment by the manufacturer and a third-party assessment by a Notified Body, an organization accredited by a member state, which includes an audit of the manufacturer’s quality system and, for some products, specific product testing.assessments required thereunder. If our productswe fail to meet the applicable EU directives, then we may not meet our projected growth targets and/or incur fines and penalties.

Our operations extend to numerous countries outside the U.S. and are subject to the risks inherent in conducting business globally andsecure a notified body certificate under the laws, regulations, and customs of various jurisdictions. These risks include compliance with a variety of national and local laws of countries in which we do business, such as restrictions on the import and export of certain intermediates, drugs, and technologies. We must also comply with a variety of U.S. laws related to doing business outside of the U.S., including Office of Foreign Asset Controls; United Nations and EU sanctions; the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012; and rules relating to the use of certain “conflict minerals” under Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Further changes in laws, regulations, and practices affecting the pharmaceutical industry and the healthcare system, including imports, exports, manufacturing, quality, cost, pricing, reimbursement, approval, inspection, and delivery of healthcare, may affect our business and operations.

Changes in existing regulations or the adoption of new regulations in the countries in which we operate could impose restrictions or delays onMDR, this will impact our ability to manufacture, distribute, sell or marketkeep our products, may be difficult or expensivemedical devices in the EU market.
Increased scrutiny of product classifications by government agencies can result in investigations and prosecutions, which carry the risk of significant civil and criminal penalties, including but not limited to, debarment from government business and prohibition to continue the business. For example, the Company is a defendant in a lawsuit initiated by the French Directorate General for usCompetition, Consumer Affairs and Repression of Fraud ("DGCCRF”) regarding the classification of our XLS Medical weight management product range in France. While the Company believes it has substantial defenses in this matter, it is not feasible to comply with, and may adversely affect our revenues, results of operations, or financial condition.predict the ultimate outcome.

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

Continuing HealthcareLimitations on reimbursement, continuing healthcare reforms, and related changes to reimbursement methods in and outside of the United States and other countries may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.operating results.


Increasing healthcare expenditures have received considerable public attention in many of the countries in which we operate. In the U.S., government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, as well as private insurers, have been focused on cost containment. In some markets in the EU and outside the U.S., the government provides healthcare at low direct cost to consumers and regulates pharmaceutical prices or patient reimbursement levels to control costs for the government-sponsored healthcare system. Both private and governmental entities are seeking ways to reduce or contain healthcare costs.

Our RX segmentcosts through legislative and regulatory efforts, as further described in particularItem 1. Business - Federal Healthcare Programs and Drug Pricing Regulation, which could be materially adversely impacted by measures taken by governmental entities or private insurers to restrict patients' access toplace further pricing pressure on our products or increase pressure on drug pricing, including denialand could negatively impact our operating results.

Under the MDRP, a number of price increases, prospective and retrospective price decreases, and increased mandatory discounts or rebates. These actions may drive us and our competitors to decrease prices or may reduce the ability of customers to pay for our products are considered non-innovator products and therefore subject to Medicaid federal upper limits ("FUL"), which could materially negatively impactrestrict the RX segment's resultsamount state Medicaid programs reimburse for non-innovator covered outpatient drugs. While utilization of operations.our products under the Medicaid program is limited, our products generally are subject to state Medicaid program payment methodologies, and may be subject to reimbursement pressures beyond our control.

29

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

If we fail to comply with the reporting and payment obligations under the Medicaid rebate program or other governmental purchasing and rebate programs, we could be subject to fines or penalties, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.be material.


As described inItem 1. Business - MedicaidFederal Healthcare Programs and Drug Rebate ProgramsPricing Regulation, we have entered intoparticipate in various U.S. government drug pricing agreementshealthcare programs and are subject to associated price reporting, payment, and other compliance obligations. Calculations of the data we must submit under the foregoing programs are governed by statutory and regulatory requirements that are complex, vary among products and programs, can change over time, and are subject to interpretation by us, governmental or regulatory agencies, and the courts. Failure to comply with the U.S. government. There are inherent risks associated with participatingprogram obligations may result in these programs, including the following:

By their nature, these programs require us to provide discounts and rebates and therefore reduce our net product revenues. Further, because the amounts of these discounts are based on our commercial sales practices and can be adversely affected by both significant discounts and price increases, it is important that we maintain pricing practices that appropriately take into account these government pricing programs.

We are required to report pricing data to CMS, including AMP, on a monthly and quarterly basis and BP and ASP on a quarterly basis. We also are required to report quarterly and annual Non-FAMPs to the VA. If we fail to submit required information on a timely basis, make misrepresentations, or knowingly submit false information to the government as to AMP, ASP, or BP, we may be liable for substantial civil monetary penalties or subject toand other enforcement actions,punitive measures and liability, such as under the False Claims Act, and CMS may terminateexclusion from some programs. We cannot be certain that our Medicaid drug rebate agreement. In that event, U.S. federal payments maysubmissions will not be availablefound by the government to be incomplete or incorrect. Requirements under Medicaid or Medicare Part B for our covered outpatient drugs.state drug price transparency programs, such as price reporting to state agencies, also present such inherent risks, including potential imposition of civil monetary penalties.

Because many of our products may be subject to Medicaid FULs or CMS’s new Medicaid “actual acquisition cost” payment methodology standard, our products may be subject to reimbursement pressures, and in some cases, those pressures may result from practices outside of our control, including how our competitors price their equivalent products. Based on our initial evaluation, we do not believe that the changes have had a material impact on our business. However, states are continuing to evaluate their payment methods, and we cannot predict how the new FUL or state payment methodologies will affect our pharmacy customers or to what extent these customers may seek additional discounts in light of reimbursement changes. We also cannot predict how the sharing of FUL data and retail survey prices may impact competition in the marketplace in the future.

Under the 340B program, if we fail to provide required discounts to covered entities, we may be subject to refund claims or civil money penalties under that program.


If we enter into an FSS contract or TRICARE agreement and inadvertently overcharge the government in connection with our FSS contract or TriCare Agreement, whether due to a misstated FCP or otherwise,either, we would be required to refund the difference. Failure to make necessary disclosures and/or to identify contract overcharges can result in False Claims Act allegations or potential violations of other laws and regulations. Unexpected refunds to the government, and responses to a government investigation or enforcement action, are expensive and time-consuming, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and growth prospects.

Unfavorable publicity or consumer perception of the safety, quality, and efficacy of our products could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are dependent upon consumers' perception of the safety, quality, and efficacy of our products. Negative consumer perception may arise from media reports, social media posts, product liability claims, regulatory investigations, or recalls affecting our products or our industry, any of which may reduce demand.

Our products involve risks such as product contamination, spoilage, mislabeling, and tampering that could require us to recall one or more of our products. Serious product quality concerns could also result in governmental actions against us that, among other things, could result in the suspension of production or distribution of our products, product seizures, loss of certain licenses, delays in the issuance of governmental approvals for new products, or other governmental penalties.
We cannot guarantee that counterfeiting, imitation or other tampering with our products will not occur or that we will be able to detect and resolve it, which could lead to death or injury of consumers and negatively impact our reputation.
Our nutritional product category is subject to certain consumer preferences and health and nutrition-related concerns, including the number of mothers who choose to use infant formula products rather than breastfeed their babies, which could change based on factors including increased promotion of the benefits of breastfeeding over the use of infant formula by private, public and government sources and changes in the number of families that are provided with infant formula by the U.S. federal government through the Women, Infants and Children program which we do not participate in.
Our CSCI segment's financial success is dependent on positive brand recognition, which results in part from large investments in marketing over a period of years. The success of our brands may suffer if we do not continue to invest in marketing, or if our marketing plans or product initiatives are unsuccessful. In addition, an issue with one of our products could negatively affect the reputation of other products, potentially hurting our financial results.
With respect to our powdered infant formula products, a risk of contamination or deterioration may exist at each stage of the production cycle, including the purchase and delivery of raw materials, the processing and packaging of food products, and the use and handling by consumers, hospital personnel, and healthcare professionals. If certain of our infant formula products are found or alleged to have suffered contamination or deterioration, whether or not under our control, our reputation and our infant formula product category sales could be materially adversely affected.
Negative social media posts or comments about us, store brands or generic pharmaceuticals, or our products could damage our reputation and adversely affect our business. Negative posts or comments
30

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors


Our reporting and payment obligations under the Medicaid rebate program and other governmental purchasing and rebate programs are complex and may involve subjective decisions. Our calculations and methodologies are subject to review by the governmental agencies, and it is possible that these reviewsabout our products could result in challengesincreased pharmacovigilance reporting requirements, which may give rise to our submissions. Ifliability if we do notfail to fully comply with those reporting and payment obligations, we could be subject to civil and/or criminal sanctions, including fines, penalties, and possible exclusion from U.S. federal healthcare programs.such requirements.


Lack of availability, or significant increases in the cost, of raw materials used in manufacturing our products could adversely impacthave a material adverse effect on our profit margins and operating results.


Affordable high qualityWe rely on third parties to source many of our raw materials and packaging components are essential to all of our business units duemanufacture certain dosage forms that we distribute, such as inhalers and sterile injectables. Refer to the nature of the products we manufacture. In addition, maintaining good supply relationships is essential to our ongoing operations. SeeItem 1. Business - Materials Sourcingfor more information.

. Certain raw materials may experience rapid cost increases due to increased labor, relevant commodities, energy costs and other inflationary pressures, and this may have a material negative impact on our financial results, whether or not we are able to pass on such increases to our customers. We maintain several single-source supplier relationships, either because alternative sources are not available or because the relationship is advantageous due to regulatory, performance, quality, support, or price considerations. Unavailability or delivery delays of single-source components or products could adversely affect our ability to ship the related product in a timely manner. Themanner, a particularly severe effect of unavailability or delivery delays would be more severe if associated with our higher-volumefor higher volume or more profitable products. Even whereIt can take substantial time and investment to qualify an alternative supplier or material sources of supply are available, qualifying the alternate suppliers and establishingestablish reliable supplies could cost more or result in delays and a loss of net sales. Additionally, global regulatory requirements for obtaining product approvals could substantially lengthen the approval of an alternate material source. As a result, the loss of a single-source supplier could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.supply.


The rapid increase in cost of many raw materials from inflationary forces, such as increased energy costs, and our ability or inability to pass on these increases to our customers could have a negative material impact on our financial results.

Our infant formula products require certain key raw ingredients that are derived from raw milk, such as skim milk powder, whey protein powder, and lactose. Our supply of milk-based ingredients may be limited by the ability of individual dairy farmers and cooperatives to provide raw milk in the amount and quality we deem necessary. Raw milk production is influenced by factors beyond our control including seasonal and environmental factors, governmental agricultural and environmental policy, and global demand. We cannot guarantee that there will be sufficient supplies of these key ingredients necessary to produce infant formula.

Our products, and the raw materials used to make the products mentioned above, generally have limited shelf lives. Our inventory levels are based, in part, on expectations regarding future sales. We may experience build-ups in inventory if sales slow. Any significant shortfall in sales may result in higher inventory levels of raw materials and finished products, thereby increasing the risk of inventory spoilage and corresponding inventory write-downs and write-offs. Cargo thefts and/or diversions, and economically or maliciously motivated product tampering on store shelves may occur, causing unexpected shortages and harm to our reputation, which may have a material impact on our operations.

We rely on third parties to source many of our raw materials, as well as to manufacture sterile, injectable products that we distribute. We maintain a strict program of verification and product testing throughout the ingredient sourcing and manufacturing process to identify potential counterfeit ingredients, adulterants, and toxic substances. Nevertheless, discovery of previously unknown problems with the raw materials, or product manufacturing processes, or new data suggesting an unacceptable safety risk associated therewith, could result in a voluntary or mandatory withdrawal of the contaminated product from the marketplace, either temporarily or permanently. Any future recall or removal would result in additional costs and lost revenue, harm our reputation, and may give rise to product liability litigation.


Changes in regulation could impact the supply of the API and certain other raw materials used in our products. For example, the EU recently promulgated new standards requiring all API imported into the EU be certified as complying with GMPGood Manufacturing Practices established by the EU. The regulations placed the certification
Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

requirement on the regulatory bodies of the exporting countries, which led to an API supply shortage in Europe as certain governments were not willing or able to comply with the regulation in a timely fashion, or at all. A shortage in API or other raw ingredients could cause us to have to cease manufacture of certain products, or to incur costs and delays to qualify other suppliers to substitute for those API manufacturers who are unable to export. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flow.


Moreover, our infant formula products require certain key raw ingredients that are derived from raw milk, which is influenced by factors beyond our control including seasonal and environmental factors, governmental agricultural and environmental policy, and global demand. Due to these factors, we cannot guarantee that there will be sufficient supplies of these key ingredients to produce infant formula.

The COVID-19 global pandemic and the public health and governmental actions in response continues to have an adverse impact on our operations and could have an adverse impact on our business and financial condition in the future.
As the COVID-19 pandemic and its variants continue to spread across the globe, the outbreak of the disease and the actions to slow its spread have had, and continues to have an adverse impact on our operations. As described in Item 7 - Executive Overview - Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic, the self-care markets in which we compete have been negatively impacted over the past year by COVID-19 pandemic related factors including, a dramatic reduction in cough, cold, and flu illnesses in the first half of the year, higher input costs, and supply chain disruptions. Starting in the second quarter of 2021, we were encouraged to see a sharp rebound in consumer takeaway in the U.S. and Europe in almost all categories, as these countries began to remove restrictions and reopen and the incidences of cough and cold related illnesses begin to increase. Despite increased consumer purchases, net sales for the second quarter of 2021 significantly lagged this consumer takeaway, which we primarily attribute to year over year reductions in customer inventories. Consumer take-away remained strong in the third quarter and we saw a surge in orders. However, due to supply chain disruptions, including the lack of truck drivers in the U.S. and record delays at global shipping ports, our net sales were negatively impacted because of the inability to ship products.

Going forward, the continued spread of the disease and the actions to slow it could have an adverse impact on our financial condition, our supply chains and other operations, our results of operations, consumer demand for our products and our ability to access capital. The magnitude of any such adverse impacts are not determinable, but could be material, depending on: the duration, intensity, and continued spread of the disease, including the
31

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors
emergence of new strains or variants of the virus, some of which may be more contagious or more severe; the imposition or reimposition of business or movement restrictions in various jurisdictions; the
timing of widespread availability and acceptance of vaccines and the efficacy of current vaccines against evolving strains or variants of the virus; the severity and duration of any economic downturn resulting from the pandemic; the effect of global supply chain and shipping challenges on the Company; the effectiveness of the Company's efforts at mitigation; and other factors, both known and unknown, many of which are likely to be outside our control. It is also possible that a change in the course of the pandemic may affect consumer demand for products or impact our operations in future periods in ways we do not currently anticipate.

Disruption of our supply chain, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our ability to manufacture, deliver and sell our products is critical to our success. Damage or disruption to our collective supply or distribution capabilities resulting from pandemics (including the COVID-19 pandemic and government responsive actions), labor shortages, border closures, weather conditions, freight carrier availability, any potential effects of climate change, natural disasters, strikes or other labor unrest or other reasons could impair our ability to source inputs or ship, sell or timely deliver our products. Competitors can be affected differently by any of these events depending on a number of factors, including the location of their suppliers and operations. Failure to take adequate steps to reduce the likelihood or mitigate the potential impact of any of these events, or to effectively manage such events if they occur, particularly when a commodity or raw material is sourced from or a product is manufactured at a single location, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and require additional resources to restore our supply chain.

During 2021, we experienced supply chain disruptions, including the lack of truck drivers in the U.S. and record delays at global shipping ports, which negatively impacted our net sales because of the inability to ship products. These supply chain disruptions led to a large increase in unfulfilled customer orders. We have taken a series of actions to improve the current situation, including reconfiguring our distribution system for short term shipments, outsourcing highly complex product lines to a third party logistic provider, adding regional carriers for challenged shipping lanes, hiring additional distribution center personnel, and increasing the purchase cycle as it relates to the manufacturing process. While we believe these actions will continue to improve our ability to ship, however, there can be no assurances that we will be able to meet demand due to supply chain constraints. Moreover, if these supply chain disruptions worsen, our results of operations could be further impacted.

A disruption at any of our main manufacturing facilities could materially and adversely affecthave a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, and results of operations.


Our manufacturing operations are concentrated in a few locations. SeeRefer toItem 1. Business - Manufacturing and Distribution for more information on our significant operations.information. A significant disruption at one or more of these facilities, whether it be due to fire, natural disaster, power loss, intentional acts of vandalism, climate change, war, terrorism, insufficient quality, or pandemic could materially and adversely affect our business.


Additionally, regulatory authorities routinely inspect all of our manufacturing facilities for cGMPcurrent GMP compliance. While our manufacturing sites are cGMPcurrent GMP compliant, if a regulatory authority were to identify serious adverse findings not corrected uponin follow up inspections, we may be required to issue product recalls, shutdown manufacturing facilities, and take other remedial actions. If any manufacturing facility were forced to cease or limit production, our business could be adversely affected.

Any breach, disruption or misuse of our information systems, cyber security efforts or personal data could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are increasingly dependent upon information technology systems to operate our business. Our systems, information, and operations, as well as our independent vendor relationships (where they support information technology and manufacturing infrastructure), are highly complex. These systems may contain confidential information (including trade secrets or other intellectual property or proprietary business information). The size and complexity of these systems makes them potentially vulnerable to disruption or damage from security breaches, hacking, data theft, denial of service attacks, human error, sabotage, industrial espionage, and computer viruses. Such events may be difficult to detect, and once detected, their impact may be difficult to assess. While we continue to employ resources to monitor our systems and protect our infrastructure, these measures may prove insufficient depending upon the attack or threat posed.

We are subject to numerous laws and regulations designed to protect personal data, such as the national laws implementing the European Union Directive on Data Protection (which will be replaced by the EU GDPR from May 2018 onward). The EU GDPR will introduce more stringent data protection requirements in the EU, as well as substantial fines for breaches of the data protection rules. The EU GDPR will increase our responsibility and liability in relation to personal data that we process, and we may be required to put in place additional mechanisms to ensure compliance with the new EU data protection rules.

These risks include:

Breaches or disruptions could impair our ability to develop, meet regulatory approval efforts, produce, and/or ship products, take and fulfill orders, and/or collect and make payments on a timely basis;

Any system issue, whether as a result of an intentional breach or a natural disaster, could damage our reputation and cause us to lose customers, experience lower sales volume, and incur significant liabilities;

We could incur significant expense by ensuring compliance with any required disclosures mandated by the numerous global privacy and security laws and regulations; and

Any interruption, security breach, or loss, misappropriation, or unauthorized access, use or disclosure of confidential information, could result in financial, legal, business, and reputational harm to us and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.


32

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

Because our business depends upon certain customers for a significant portion of our sales, our business would be adversely affected by a disruption of our relationship with these customers or any material adverse change in these customers' businesses.

Sales to our largest customer, Walmart, comprised approximately 13% of our net sales for the year ended December 31, 2017. While no other customer individually comprised more than 10% of net sales, we do have other significant customers. If our relationship with Walmart or any of our other significant customers, including the terms of doing business with the customers, changes significantly, it could have a material adverse impact on us (refer toItem 1. Business - Significant Customers).

Many of our customers, which include chain drug stores, wholesalers, distributors, hospital systems, and group purchasing organizations, continue to merge or consolidate. Such consolidation has provided, and may continue to provide, customers with additional purchasing leverage, and consequently may increase the pricing pressures we face. The emergence of large buying groups representing independent retail pharmacies enable those groups to extract price discounts on our products. In addition, a number of our customers have instituted sourcing programs limiting the number of suppliers of generic pharmaceutical products carried by that customer. These developments have resulted in heightened pricing pressure on our products, as well as competition among generic drug producers for business from a smaller and more selective customer base.

Additionally, if we are unable to maintain adequately high levels of customer service over time, customers may choose to assess penalties, obtain alternate sources for products, and/or end their relationships with us.

Although we have divested our rights to the Tysabri® royalty stream, we are entitled to additional milestone payments if certain specified thresholds are met, and any negative developments related to Tysabri® could have a material adverse effect on our receipt of those payments.

We occasionally enter into arrangements that entitle us to potential royalties from third parties. Our most significant royalty has been the Tysabri® royalty stream which we received quarterly from Biogen. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $84.4 million of cash was earned, which was received during the year ended December 31, 2017. On March 27, 2017, we divested our rights to the Tysabri® royalty stream to Royalty Pharma for $2.2 billion in cash at closing and up to $250.0 million and $400.0 million in milestone payments if global net sales of Tysabri® meet specific thresholds in 2018 and 2020, respectively. Our receipt of these milestone payments may be negatively impacted if the royalty streams decrease and are insufficient to meet the specified thresholds. Given the fact these milestone payments are recorded at fair value, if it is determined that Tysabri® global sales levels do not meet specific thresholds, we would recognize a material charge in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Factors that may have an adverse effect on the Tysabri® royalty stream include:

Companies working to develop new therapies or alternative formulations of products for multiple sclerosis that, if successfully developed, would compete with, or could gain greater acceptance than, Tysabri® and damage it’s market share. In February 2016, a competitor's pipeline product, Ocrevus®, received breakthrough therapy designation from the FDA, this product was launched in 2017. The product is expected to compete with Tysabri® and have a significant negative impact on the Tysabri® royalty stream;

Biogen is the owner of the patents on Tysabri®. The loss of protection of these patents, such as a patent invalidation, could adversely affect the royalty stream from Tysabri®. In addition, once the Tysabri® patents expire, other generic companies may introduce products similar to Tysabri® that could adversely affect the royalty stream;

Foreign currency movement, which could have a negative impact on Biogen's Tysabri® sales, thereby reducing the royalties;

Any negative developments relating to Tysabri®, such as safety, efficacy, or reimbursement issues, could reduce demand for Tysabri®; and

Adverse regulatory or legislative developments could limit or prohibit the sale of Tysabri®, such as restrictions on the use of Tysabri® or safety-related label changes, including enhanced risk management
Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

programs, which may significantly reduce expected royalty revenue and require significant expense and management time to address the associated legal and regulatory issues.

Additionally, Tysabri® sales growth cannot be assured given the significant restrictions on its use and the significant safety warnings on the label, including the risk of developing Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy ("PML"), a serious brain infection. The risk of developing PML mayincrease with prior immunosuppressant use, longer treatment duration, or the presence of certain antibodies. Increased incidence of PML could limit sales growth, prompt regulatory review, require significant changes to the label, or result in market withdrawal. In addition, the result of ongoing or future clinical trials involving Tysabri® or other adverse events reported in association with the use of Tysabri® may have an adverse impact on prescribing behavior and reduce sales of Tysabri®.

Furthermore, there can be no assurance that Royalty Pharma will pay either or both of the milestone payments even if the specified thresholds are met.

We are dependent on the services of certain key members of management. Our inability to successfully manage transition, or the failure to attract and retain other key members of management, may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

We are dependent on the services of certain key employees, and our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract and retain highly skilled employees. Key functions for us include executive managers, operational managers, R&D scientists, information technology specialists, financial and legal specialists, regulatory professionals, quality compliance specialists, and sales/marketing personnel. If we are unable to attract or retain key qualified employees, our future operating results may be adversely impacted.

Management transition creates uncertainties, and any difficulties we experience in managing such transitions may negatively impact our business.

Recently, we have experienced changes in our executive leadership. In June 2017, we announced the forthcoming retirement of John T. Hendrickson as our Chief Executive Officer. On January 8, 2018, we announced the appointment of Uwe Roehrhoffas President and Chief Executive Officer and member of our Board. Mr. Hendrickson will continue to serve in an advisory role until March 15, 2018. In addition, in February 2017, we announced the resignation of Judy L. Brown as our Executive Vice President, Business Operations and Chief Financial Officer, effective February 27, 2017. Ronald L. Winowiecki, who had been with the Company in various treasury and senior finance roles since October 2008, most recently as our Senior Vice President of Business Finance, served as acting Chief Financial Officer from February 27, 2017 until his appointment as Chief Financial Officer on February 20, 2018. Changes in executive management create uncertainty. Moreover, changes in our company as a result of management transition could have a disruptive impact on our ability to implement, or result in changes to, our strategy and could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Unfavorable publicity or consumer perception of the safety, quality, and efficacy of our products could have a material adverse impact on our business.

We are dependent upon consumers' perception of the safety, quality, and efficacy of our products, and may be affected by changing consumer preferences. Negative consumer perception may arise from media reports, product liability claims, regulatory investigations, or recalls, regardless of whether they involve us or our products. The mere publication of information asserting defects in products or ingredients, or concerns about our products or the materials used in our products, could discourage consumers from buying our products, regardless of whether such information is scientifically supported.

Our products involve risks such as product contamination, spoilage, mislabeling, and tampering that could require us to recall one or more of our products. Serious product quality concerns could also result in governmental actions against us that, among other things, could result in the suspension of production or distribution of our products, product seizures, loss of certain licenses, delays in the issuance of governmental approvals for new products, or other governmental penalties, all of which could be detrimental to our reputation and reduce demand for our products.

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

We cannot guarantee that counterfeiting, imitation or other tampering with our products will not occur or that we will be able to detect and resolve it. Any counterfeiting or contamination of any products could negatively impact our reputation and sales, particularly if counterfeit or imitation products cause death or injury to consumers.

Many of the brands we acquired from Omega have European recognition. This recognition is the result of the large investments Omega has made in its products over many years. The quality and safety of the products are critical to our business. If we are unable to effectively manage real or perceived issues, including concerns about safety, quality, efficacy, or similar matters, sentiments toward us and our products could be negatively impacted.

Our CHCI segment's financial success is dependent on the success of its brands, and the success of these brands can suffer if marketing plans or product initiatives do not have the desired impact on a brand’s image or its ability to attract consumers and the performance of the segment may be negatively impacted if spending on such plans and initiatives does not generate the returns we anticipate. In addition, given the association of individual products within the commercial network of our CHCI segment, an issue with one of our products could negatively affect the reputation of other products, thereby potentially hurting our financial results.

Powdered infant formula products are not sterile. All of our infant formula products must be prepared and maintained according to label instruction to retain their flavor and nutritional value and avoid contamination or deterioration. Depending on the product, a risk of contamination or deterioration may exist at each stage of the production cycle, including the purchase and delivery of raw materials, the processing and packaging of food products, and the use and handling by consumers, hospital personnel, and healthcare professionals. In the event that certain of our infant formula products are found or alleged to have suffered contamination or deterioration, whether or not under our control, our reputation and our infant formula product category sales could be materially adversely affected.

Increasing use of social media could give rise to liability, breaches of data security, or reputation damage.

The Company and our employees increasingly utilize social media as a means of internal and external communication.

To the extent that we seek to use social media tools as a means to communicate about our products and/or business, there are uncertainties as to the rules that apply to such communications, or as to the interpretations that authorities will apply to the rules that exist. As a result, despite our efforts to monitor evolving social media communication guidelines and comply with applicable rules, there is risk that our use of social media for such purposes may cause us to be found in violation of them. A violation of such guidelines may damage our reputation as well as cause potential lawsuits and adversely affect our operating activities.

Our employees may knowingly or inadvertently make use of social media tools in ways that may not be aligned with our social media strategy, may give rise to liability, or could lead to the loss of trade secrets or other intellectual property, or public exposure of personal information (including sensitive personal information) of our employees, clinical trial patients, customers, and others.

Negative posts or comments about us, store brands or generic pharmaceuticals, or our products in social media could seriously damage our reputation and could adversely affect the price of our securities. In addition, negative posts or comments about our products could result in increased pharmacovigilance reporting requirements, which may give rise to liability if we fail to fully comply with such requirements.

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

Our quarterly results are impacted by a number of factors, some of which are beyond the control of our management, that may result in significant quarter-to-quarter fluctuations in operating results.

Some of the factors that may impact our quarterly results include the severity, length and timing of the cough/cold/flu and allergy seasons, the flea and tick season, the timing of new product approvals and introductions by us and our competitors, price competition, changes in the regulatory environment, changes in accounting pronouncements, changes in the levels of inventories maintained by our customers, and the timing of retailer promotional programs. These and other factors may result in significant variations in our operating results from quarter to quarter.

We may not be able to sustain or improve operating results in our business segments.
We have experienced a reduction in pricing expectations during 2017 in comparison to historical patterns in our U.S. businesses, in particular in our RX segment, due to competitive pressures in the sector. The reduced pricing is attributable to a variety of factors including increased focus from customers to capture supply chain productivity savings, competition in specific product categories, the loss of exclusivity on certain products, the recent increase in the speed and number of approvals from the FDA, and consolidation of certain customers in the RX segment. We expect this pricing environment to continue to impact the Company for the foreseeable future.

The CHCI segment has been positively impacted by market dynamics in countries such as the Nordics, Italy, and Portugal offset by softness in certain brand categories in France and Germany, as well as by unfavorable foreign currency impacts primarily in the U.K. related to Brexit. In addition, the segment had been impacted in Belgium due to cancellations of unprofitable distribution agreements. The CHCI segment has restructured its approach to addressing these markets including: (1) the implementation of a brand prioritization strategy to address these market dynamics, with an objective to balance the cost of advertising and promotional investments with expected contributions from category sales, and (2) restructured its sales force in each of these markets to more effectively serve customers. The combination of these actions is expected to improve the segment's focus on higher value OTC products, reduce selling costs and improve operating margins in the segment.

We continue to experience a reduction in pricing expectations within our CHCA segment, primarily in the cough/cold, animal health, and analgesics categories due to various factors, including focus from customers to capture supply chain productivity savings and competition in specific product categories. We expect this pricing environment to continue to impact our CHCA segment for the foreseeable future.

There can be no assurance that we will not continue to experience challenges related to our segments, and these challenges could have a material impact on our business, cash flows, and results of operations or result in impairment charges, and the market value of our ordinary shares and/or debt securitiesmay decline.

We may not realize the benefits of business acquisitions and divestitures we enter into, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

In the normal course of business, we engage in discussions relating to possible acquisitions and divestitures. These transactions are accompanied by a number of risks. Many of these risks are beyond our control, and any one of them could result in increased cost, decreased net sales and diversion of management’s time and energy, any or all of which could materially impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Acquisitions

One of our strategies is inorganic growth through the acquisition of products and companies that we expect will benefit the Company. This strategy comes with a number of financial, managerial, and operational risks. We may not realize the benefits of an acquisition because of integration and other challenges, including, but not limited to the following:

Difficulty involved with managing the expanded operations of the respective parties, as well as identifying the extent of all weaknesses, risks, and contingent and other liabilities;
Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

Uncertainties involved in assessing the value, strengths, and potential profitability of the respective parties, as well as identifying the extent of all weaknesses, risks, and contingent and other liabilities of acquisition targets;
Unanticipated changes in the business, industry, market or general economic conditions different from the assumptions underlying our rationale for pursuing the transaction;
Difficulties due to a lack of, or limited experience in, any new product or geographic markets we enter;
Inability to achieve identified operating and financial synergies, or return on investment, from an acquisition in the amounts or on the time frame anticipated;
Substantial demands on our management, operational resources, technology, and financial and internal control systems, which could lead to dissatisfaction and potential loss of key customers, management, or employees;
Integration activities that may detract attention from our day-to-day business, and substantial costs associated with the transaction process or other material adverse effects as a result of these integration efforts; and
Difficulties, restrictions or increased costs associated with raising future capital in connection with an acquisition may impact our liquidity, credit ratings and financial position, thereby making it more difficult, restrictive or expensive to raise future capital. In addition, the issuance of equity to pay a portion of the purchase price for an acquisition would dilute our existing shareholders.    

Divestitures

We may evaluate potential divestiture opportunities with respect to portions of our business (including specific assets or categories of assets) from time to time, and may proceed with a divestiture opportunity if and when we believe it is consistent with our business strategy and initiatives. Any future divestitures could expose us to significant risk, including without limitation:

Our ability to effectively transfer liabilities, contracts, facilities and personnel to any purchaser;
Fees for legal and transaction-related services;
Diversion of management resources; and
Loss of key personnel and reduction in revenue.
If we do not realize the expected strategic, economic or other benefits of any divestiture transaction, it could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our business could be negatively affected by the performance of our collaboration partners and suppliers.suppliers, and any such adverse impact could be material.
We have entered into strategic alliances with partners and suppliers to develop, manufacture, market and/or distribute certain products, or components of our products in various markets. We commit substantial effort, funds and other resources to these various collaborations. There is a risk that our investments in these collaborative arrangements will not generate financial returns. While we believe our relationships with our partners and suppliers generally are successful, disputes, conflicting priorities or regulatory or legal intervention could be a source of delay or uncertainty as to the expected benefit of the collaboration (refercollaboration. Refer to Item 8. Note 171 for additional detail on our collaborative agreements and other contractual arrangements). A failure or inability of our partners or suppliers to fulfill their collaboration obligations, or the occurrence of any of the risks above, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our business depends upon certain customers for a significant portion of our sales, therefore our business would be adversely affected by a disruption of our relationship with these customers or any material adverse change in these customers' businesses. The risk of such impacts would be increased by continued consolidation in the sector in which our customers operate.

We have one significant customer that represents approximately 14% of our consolidated net sales. While we have other important customers, no other individual customer represents more than 10% of net sales. However, the loss of one or more of our customers could be material. We believe we have good relationships with all our customers. If our relationship with any of our significant customers, including the terms of doing business with the customers, changes significantly, it could have a material adverse impact on us. Refer toItem 1. Business - Significant Customers.

Additionally, if we are unable to maintain adequately high levels of customer service over time, customers may choose to assess penalties (where such penalties are contractually permitted), obtain alternate sources for products, and/or end their relationships with us.

Our businesses could be adversely affected by deteriorating economic conditions in the countries in which we operate, and our results may be volatile due to these or other circumstances beyond our control.

Our customers could be adversely impacted if economic conditions worsen in the U.S. or other countries in which we operate. In the U.S., our consumer self-care business does not advertise our store brand products like national brand companies and thus is largely dependent on retailer promotional activities to drive sales volume and increase market share. If our customers do not have the ability to invest in store brand promotional activities, our sales may suffer. Additionally, while we actively review the credit worthiness of our customers and suppliers, we cannot fully predict to what extent they may be negatively impacted by slowing economic growth. Our stock price may decline due to any earnings release or guidance that does not meet market expectations or other circumstances beyond our control, such as the severity, length and timing of the cough/cold/flu and allergy seasons, the timing of new product approvals and introductions by us and our competitors, and the timing of retailer promotional programs.

A cyber security breach, disruption or misuse of our information systems, or our external business partners’ information systems could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our business operations are increasingly dependent upon information technology systems that are highly complex, interrelated with our external business partners, and may contain confidential information (including personal data, trade secrets or other intellectual property, or proprietary business information). The nature of digital systems, both internally and externally, makes them potentially vulnerable to disruption or damage from human error and/or security breaches, which include, but are not limited to, ransomware, data theft, denial of service attacks, sabotage, industrial espionage, interruptions or other system issues, unauthorized access and computer viruses. Such events may be difficult to detect, and once detected, their impact may be difficult to assess and address.

Cyber-attacks have become increasingly common. We have experienced immaterial business disruption, monetary loss and data loss as a result of phishing, business email compromise and other types of attacks. While we continue to employ resources to monitor our systems and protect our infrastructure, these measures may prove insufficient, and that could subject us to significant risks, including, without limitation:
33

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors
Ransomware attacks, other cyber breaches or disruptions that impair our ability to develop products, meet regulatory approval requirements or deadlines, produce or ship products, take or fulfill orders, and/or collect or make payments on a timely basis;
System issues, whether as a result of an intentional breach, a natural disaster or human error that damage our reputation and cause us to lose customers, experience lower sales volume, and/or incur significant liabilities;
Significant expense to remediate the results of any attack or breach and to ensure compliance with any required disclosures mandated by the numerous global privacy and security laws and regulations; and
Interruptions, security breaches, or loss, misappropriation, or unauthorized access, use or disclosure of confidential information,
which, individually or collectively, could result in financial, legal, business or reputational harm to us and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are also subject to numerous laws and regulations designed to protect personal data, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act in the U.S. and the European General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR"). These data protection laws introduced more stringent data protection requirements and significant potential fines, as well as increased our responsibility and potential liability in relation to personal data that we process and possess. We have put mechanisms in place to ensure compliance with applicable data protection lawsbut there can be no guarantee of their effectiveness.

We are dependent on the services of certain key personnel.

We are dependent on the services of certain key personnel, and our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract and retain highly skilled employees. Key functions for us include executive managers, operational managers, R&D scientists, information technology specialists, financial and legal specialists, regulatory professionals, quality compliance specialists, and sales/marketing personnel. If we are unable to attract or retain key qualified employees, our future operating results may be adversely impacted.

Management transition creates uncertainties, and any difficulties we experience in managing such transitions may negatively impact our business.

Effective October 4, 2021, Jim Dillard was named EVP and President of our CSCA segment. Changes in executive management create uncertainty. Moreover, changes in our company as a result of management transition could have a disruptive impact on our ability to implement, or result in changes to, our strategy and could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Strategic Risks

We may not realize the benefits of business acquisitions, divestitures, and other strategic transactions, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

In the normal course of business, we engage in discussions relating to possible acquisitions, divestitures, and other strategic transactions, some of which may be significant in size or impact. Transactions of this nature create substantial demands on management, operational resources, technology, and financial and internal control systems, and can be subject to government approvals or other closing conditions beyond the parties' control. In the case of acquisitions, including the acquisition of HRA Pharma, we may face difficulties with integrating these businesses, managing expanded operations, achieving operating or financial synergies in expected timeframes or in new products or geographic markets. In the case of divestitures, including the separation of the RX business, we may face difficulty in effectively transferring contracts, obligations, facilities, and personnel to the purchaser, while minimizing continued exposure to risks and liabilities of the divested business.

There are inherent uncertainties involved in identifying and assessing the value, strengths, and profit potential, as well as the weaknesses, risks, and contingent and other liabilities of acquisition targets, which can be affected by changes in business, industry, market or general economic conditions. Moreover, the financing of any acquisition can have a material impact on our liquidity, credit ratings and financial position. Alternatively, issuing equity to pay all or a portion of acquisition purchase price would dilute our existing shareholders.    

On September 8, 2021, we and the Purchaser entered into a Put Option Agreement to acquire certain holding companies holding all of the outstanding equity interests of HRA Pharma from funds affiliated with the
34

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors
Sellers. On October 20, 2021, the Company, the Purchaser and the Sellers entered into the Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement, the Purchaser has agreed to acquire certain holding companies holding all of the outstanding equity interests of HRA Pharma from the Sellers for cash. The proposed final transaction is subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals. Other events, changes or circumstances could delay the transaction or result in the termination of the Purchase Agreement. There can be no assurances as to the Company’s ability to fulfill the conditions to closing in the expected timeframe, or at all, or the ability to achieve the expected benefits of the acquisition. Moreover, anticipated integration or other costs in connection with the proposed acquisition may change.

Acquisitions and divestitures, also involve costs, including fees and expenses of financial advisors, lawyers, accountants, and other professionals, and can involve retention bonuses and other additional compensation of employees or increase turnover in personnel. Any of these risks or expenses could have a negative effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

We have acquired significant assets that could become impaired or subject us to losses and may result in an adverse impact on our results of operations.

We have recorded significant goodwill and intangible assets and goodwill on our balance sheet as a result of previous acquisitions, which could become impaired and lead to material charges in the future.


As of the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded definite-lived intangible asset impairment charges of $19.7 million related to developed product technology/formulation and product rights, and distribution and license
Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

agreements primarily in our RX segment and $12.7 million of impairment charge related to certain IPR&D assets primarily in our RX segment.

As of the year ended December 31, 2016, we recorded the following impairments:

Goodwill impairment charges of $1.1 billion related to our Specialty Sciences, Branded Consumer Healthcare-Rest of World ("BCH-ROW"), BCH-Belgium, and Animal Health reporting units.

Indefinite-lived and definite-lived intangible asset impairment charges of $1.5 billion related to: Trademarks, trade names and brands, developed product technology/formulation and product rights, distribution and license agreements, and supply agreements.

We perform an impairment analysis on intangible assets subject to amortization when there is an indication that the carrying amount of any individual asset may not be recoverable. Any significant change in market conditions, estimates or judgments used to determine expected future cash flows that indicates a reduction in carrying value may give rise to impairment in the period that the change becomes known. Goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible asset, and definite-lived intangible asset impairments are recorded in Impairment charges on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. As of December 31, 2017,2021, the net book value of our goodwill and intangible assets and goodwill were $3.4$3.0 billion and $4.2$2.2 billion, respectively. SeeIn the past three years, we have recognized a total of $186.9 million in asset impairments, across all segments and asset categories.

Refer toItem 8. Note 34for moreadditional information on the above impairment charges.related to our goodwill and intangible assets.


There can be no assurance that our strategic initiatives will achieve their intended effects.
We are in the process of implementing certain initiatives designed to increase operational efficiency and improve our return on invested capital by globalizing our supply chain through global shared service arrangements, streamlining our organizational structure, making key executive employee changes, performing a strategic portfolio review, and disposing of certain assets. Furthermore, while we have completed our transformation into a consumer-focused, self-care company, there can be no assurance that such transformation will receive the level of market support that we expect or that we will be able to achieve the anticipated operational, strategic and other benefits. Moreover, our business is now less diversified with a narrower focus, which could make us more susceptible to changing market conditions.

We believe these initiatives will enhance our net sales, operating margins, and earnings; however, certain of these initiatives require substantial upfront costs, and there can be no assurance thatany of these initiatives will produce the anticipated benefits. Any delay or failure to achieve the anticipated benefits could have a material adverse effect on our projected results.

We identified material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting; failure to remediate the material weakness could negatively impact our business and the price of our ordinary shares.

In connection with our review of certain material misstatements related to the characterization of the Tysabri® royalty stream, income taxes and the evaluation of long-lived assets in our animal health reporting unit for impairment testing, in each case contained in certain of our historical financial statements and identified as part of our December 31, 2016 year end, we concluded that there were material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that contributed to those misstatements. The material weaknesses over the income tax process that was identified during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 was not remediated during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, and we determined that we did not design or maintain effective controls over our income tax accounting process. As a result of the material weaknesses, we concluded that we did not maintain, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, April 1, 2017, July 1, 2017, September 30, 2017 or December 31, 2017 based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). The failure to maintain effective control over financial reporting in turn resulted in material deficiencies in our disclosure controls and procedures.

We continue to identify and implement, actions to improve the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, but there can be no assurance that such remediation efforts will be successful. We have also incurred and may continue to incur substantial accounting, legal, consulting, and other costs in connection with remediating the material weaknesses. Failure to remediate the material weaknesses could have a negative impact on our business and the market for our ordinary shares. For more information on our material weaknesses and the status of our remediation efforts, see Item 9A - Controls and Procedures, which includes Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.


35

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

Global Risks


Our business, financial condition, and results of operations are subject to risks arising from the international scope of our operations.


We manufacture, source raw materials, and sell our products in a number of countries. The percentage of our business outside the U.S. has been increasing. We are subject to risks associated with international manufacturing and sales, including:

Unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
Problems relatedrequirements. Refer to markets with different cultural biases or political systems;
Possible difficulties in enforcing agreements;
Difficulties obtaining Pricing, for changes to tax and import/export or import licenses;
Changes to U.S.laws and foreign trade and customs policies including(including the enactment of tariffs on goods imported into the U.S., including but not limited to, goods imported from Mexico;China), problems related to markets with different cultural biases or political systems, possible difficulties in enforcing agreements, longer payment cycles and
Imposition shipping lead-times, difficulties obtaining export or import licenses, and imposition of withholding or other taxes.


Additionally, we are subject to periodic reviews and audits by governmental authorities responsible for administering import/import and export regulations. To the extent that we are unable to successfully defend against an audit or review, we may be required to pay assessments, penalties, and increased duties.


Certain of our facilities operate in a special purpose sub-zone established by the U.S. Department of Commerce Foreign Trade Zone Board, which allows us certain tax advantages on products and raw materials shipped through these facilities. If the Foreign Trade Zone Board were to revoke the sub-zone designation or limit our use, we could be subject to increased duties.


Although we believe that we conduct our business in compliance with applicable anti-corruption, anti-bribery and economic sanctions or other anti-corruption laws, if we are found to not be in compliance with such laws or other anti-corruption laws, we could be subject to governmental investigations, legal or regulatory proceedings, substantial fines, and/or other legal or equitable penalties. This risk increases in locations outside of the U.S., particularly in locations that have not previously had to comply with the FCPA, U.K. Bribery Act 2010, Irish Criminal Justice (Corruption Offenses) Act 2018, and similar laws.


We operate in jurisdictions that could be affected by economic and politicalgeopolitical instability, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.


Our operations and supply partners could be affected by economic or political instability, embargoes, military hostilities, unstable governments and legal systems, and inter-governmental disputes. We have significant operations in Israel, which has experienced varying degreesdisputes as well as travel restrictions, terrorist acts, and other armed conflicts. The global nature of hostility in recent years. Doingour business in Israel and certain other regions involves the following risks:risks, among others:


Certain countries and international organizations have refused to do business with companies with Israeli operations. We are also precluded from marketing our products to certain countries due to U.S. and Israeli regulatory restrictions. International economic sanctions and boycotts of our products could negatively impact our sales and ability to export our products.

Our facilities in Israel are within a conflict zone. If terrorist acts or military actions were to result in substantial damage to our facilities, our business activities would be disrupted since, with respect to most products, we would need to obtain prior regulatory agency approval for a change in manufacturing site. In addition, our insurance may not adequately compensate us for losses that may occur, and any losses or damages incurred by us could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

The U.S. Department of State and other governments have at times issued advisories regarding travel to certain countries in which we do business. As a result,business, causing regulatory agencies have at various times curtailedto curtail or prohibitedprohibit their inspectors from traveling to inspect facilities. If these inspectors are unable to inspect our facilities, the regulatory agencies could withhold approval for new products intended to be produced at those facilities.


Our international operations may be subject to interruption due to travel restrictions, war, terrorist acts, and other armed conflicts. Also, further threats of armed hostilities in certain countries could limit or disrupt markets and our operations, including disruptions resulting from the cancellation of contracts or the loss of assets. These events could have a material adverse effect on our international business operations.

The UK held a referendum onOn June 23, 2016, on its membershipthe UK electorate voted in the EU. A majority of UK voters voteda referendum to exitvoluntarily depart from the EU, (“Brexit”)known as "Brexit". The UK is scheduled to leaveGovernment subsequently approved a withdrawal agreement and left the EU on March 29, 2019,January 31, 2020. The UK left the EU customs union and negotiations are taking placethe single market for a transition period that expired on December 31, 2020. The Trade and Cooperation Agreement ("TCA") was signed on December 30, 2020, was applied provisionally as of January 1, 2021 and entered into force on May 1, 2021. The TCA provides for free trade in goods and limited mutual market access in services, as well as for cooperation mechanisms in a range of policy areas and UK participation in some EU programs. It is for indefinite duration but is subject to determinereview every 5 years and may be terminated on 12 months’ notice. Uncertainty relating to the Ireland/Northern Ireland protocol remains. It is unclear whether the flexible solutions proposed by the EU Commission to ensure uninterrupted supply of medicines from Great Britain to Northern Ireland will be implemented. However, significant political and economic uncertainty remains as to aspects of the future relationship between the UK and the EU. Future trading terms between the UK and other trading partners, including the United States, are also unknown. Although the TCA is in place, the full extent of any disruption on imports and exports, for example relating to increased regulatory complexities, is unknown. The UK now has an ability to diverge from EU regulation (the UK Government’s stated aim), which could enable the UK’s relationship withUK to seek competitive regulatory advantage. However, the EU includingcould respond by withdrawing benefits under the terms of withdrawal, the terms of future trading and relations and any potential transition periods. Brexit has created significant instability and volatility in the global financial markets, has led to significant weakening of the British pound compared to the U.S. dollar and other currencies, and could adversely affect European or worldwide economic or market conditions. Although it is unknown what the future trading terms with the EU will be, theyTCA. These complexities may impair the ability of our operations in the EU to transact business in the futureUK in the UK,future, and similarly the ability of our UK operations to transact business in the future in the EU. Specifically, it is possible that there will be greater restrictions on imports and exports between the UK and EU countries, increased restrictions on freedom of movement for employees, and increased regulatory complexities. In
36

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors
addition, Brexit could lead to legal uncertainty and potentially divergentdifferent national laws and regulations as the UK determines which EU laws to replace or replicate. Further, among other things, Brexit could reduce consumer spending in the UK and the EU, which could result in decreased demand for our products. Any of thesethe above mentioned effects of Brexit, and others we cannot anticipate, could adversely affect our business, business opportunities, operations, and financial results.


WhileMoreover, financial volatility and geopolitical instability outside the challengingU.S. may impact our operations or affect global economic environment has not hadmarkets. For example, the outbreak of war between Russia and Ukraine and the resulting sanctions by U.S. and European governments, together with any additional future sanctions by them, could have a materiallarger impact onthat expands into other markets where we do business, including our liquidity or capital resources, there can be no assurance that possible future changessupply chain, business partners and customers in global financial marketsthe broader region, which could result in lost sales, supply shortages, increase manufacturing costs and global economiclost efficiencies. Further, the conflict may adversely impact macroeconomic conditions will notand increase volatility in and affect our liquidity or capital resources, impact our ability to obtainaccess capital markets and external financing sources on acceptable terms or decreaseat all. Given the valueinternational scope of our assets.

The challenging economic conditions have also impactedoperations, any of the movements in exchange rates, which have experienced significant recent volatility. Uncertainty regarding the future growth ratesabove mentioned effects of war between countries, the influence of central bank actions,Russia and the changing political environment globally may contribute to continued high levels of exchange rate volatility, whichUkraine, and others we cannot anticipate, could have an adverse impact onadversely affect our business, business opportunities, operations, and financial results.

Our customers could be adversely impacted if economic conditions worsen. Our CHCA segment does not advertise its products like national brand companies and thus is largely dependent on retailer promotional activities to drive sales volume and increase market share.If our customers do not have the ability to invest in store brand promotional activities, our sales may suffer. Additionally, while we actively review the credit worthiness of our customers and suppliers, we cannot fully predict to what extent they may be negatively impacted by slowing economic growth.


The international scope of our business exposes us to risks associated with foreign exchange rates.


We report our financial results in U.S. dollars. However, a significant portion of our net sales, assets, indebtedness and other liabilities, and costs are denominated in foreign currencies. These currencies include, among others, the euro,Euro, Indian rupee, British pound, Canadian dollar, Israeli shekel, Australian dollar, and Mexican peso. The addition of Omega,Our Branded Consumer Self-care business ("BCS") is a euro-denominated business that represents a significant portion of our net sales, andnet earnings and net assets. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates, including as a substantial portionresult of inflation, central bank monetary policies, currency controls or other currency exchange restrictions have had, and could continue to have, an adverse impact on our net assets, has significantly increased our exposurefinancial performance. We may seek to changes inmitigate the euro/U.S. dollar exchange rate. Approximately 34%risk of Omega’s sales are in other foreign currencies, with the majority of the product costs for these markets denominated in euros. such impacts through hedging, but such hedging activities may be costly and may not be effective.


In addition, several emerging market economies arein which we operate may be particularly vulnerable to the impact of rising interest rates, inflationary pressures, weaker oil and other commodity prices, and large external deficits. While some of
Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

these jurisdictions are showing signs of stabilization or recovery, others continue to experience levels of stress and volatility. Risks in one country can limit our opportunities for portfolio growth and negatively affect our operations in another country or countries. As a result, any such unfavorableSuch conditions or developments could have an adverse impact on our operations. Our results of operations and, in some cases, cash flows, have in the past been, and may in the future be, adversely affected by movements in exchange rates. In addition, we may also be exposed to credit risks in some of those markets.We may implement currency hedges or take other actions intended to reduce our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. If we are not successful in mitigating the effects of changes in exchange rates on our business, any such changes could materially impact our results.


Risks Related to
Litigation and Insurance Risks


We are or may become involved in lawsuits and may experience unfavorable outcomes of such proceedings.


We may become involved in lawsuits arising from a wide variety of commercial, manufacturing, development, marketing, sales and other business-related matters, including, but not limited to, competitive issues, pricing, contract issues, intellectual property matters, false advertising, antitrust or unfair competition, taxation matters, workers' compensation, product quality/recall, environmental remediation, securities law, disclosure, product liability and regulatory issues. Litigation is unpredictable and can be costly.could result in potentially significant monetary damages, and we could incur substantial legal expenses, even if a claim against us is unsuccessful. We intend to vigorously defend against any lawsuits, however, we cannot predict how the cases will be resolved. Adverse results in, theor settlements of, such cases could result in substantial monetary judgments. No assurance can be made that litigation will not have a material adverse effect on our reputation, financial position or results of operations in the future (referfuture. Refer to Item 8. Note 1619.

The actual or alleged presence of certain hazardous substances or petroleum products on, under or in our currently or formerly owned property, or from a third-party disposal facility that we may have used, or the failure to remediate them, could have adverse effects, including, for example, substantial investigative or remedial obligations and limitations on our ability to sell or rent affected property or to borrow funds using affected property as collateral. There can be no assurance that environmental liabilities and costs will not have a material adverse effect on us. Refer to Item 1. Business - Information Applicable to All Reportable Segments - Environmental for more information on specific ongoing litigation).related to environmental remediation matters.

We may be subject to liability if our products violate applicable laws or regulations in the jurisdictions where our products are distributed. The successful assertion of product liability or other product-related claims against us could result in potentially significant monetary damages, and we could incur substantial legal expenses. Even if a product liability or consumer fraud claim is unsuccessful, not merited, or not fully pursued, we may still incur substantial legal expenses defending against such a claim, and our reputation may suffer.

We may face environmental exposures including, for example, those relating to discharges from and materials handled as part of our operations, the remediation of soil and groundwater contaminated by hazardous substances or wastes, and the health and safety of our employees. While we do not have any material remediation liabilities currently outstanding, we may in the future face liability for the costs of investigation, removal or remediation of certain hazardous substances or petroleum products on, under or in our currently or formerly owned property, or from a third-party disposal facility that we may have used, without regard to whether we knew of, or caused, the presence of the contaminants. The actual or alleged presence of these substances, or the failure to remediate them, could have adverse effects, including, for example, substantial investigative or remedial obligations and limitations on our ability to sell or rent affected property or to borrow funds using affected property as collateral. There can be no assurance that environmental liabilities and costs will not have a material adverse effect on us. See Item 1. Business - Information Applicable to All Reportable Segments - Environmental for more information.

Our CHCI segment regularly makes advertising claims regarding the effectiveness of its products, which we are responsible for defending. An unsuccessful defense of product-related claims could result in potentially significant monetary damages and substantial legal expenses. Even if a claim is unsuccessful, not merited, or not fully pursued, we may still incur substantial legal expenses defending against such a claim, and our reputation could suffer.

Additionally, we may be the target of claims asserting violations of securities fraud and derivative actions, or other litigation proceedings in the future.


37

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

Increased scrutiny on pricing practices and competition in the pharmaceutical industry, including antitrust enforcement activity by government agencies and class action litigation, may have an adverse impact on our business and results of operations.operating results.


There has been increased scrutiny regarding sales, marketing, and pricing practices in the pharmaceutical industry, from both government agencies and the media, including allegations of “price gouging” and/or collusion. This includes recent U.S. Congressional inquiries and hearings in connection with the investigation of specific price increases by several pharmaceutical companies, proposed and enacted legislation seeking greater transparency incriminal antitrust investigations regarding drug pricing, civil False Claims Act investigations relating to drug pricing and criminal investigations regarding drug pricing. U.S. federalmarketing, multiple civil antitrust litigation initiated by governmental and state prosecutors have issued subpoenas to a number ofprivate plaintiffs against pharmaceutical companies seeking information about their drug pricing practices,manufacturers and several class action lawsuits have been filed that allege price-fixing with respect to various pharmaceutical products. In December 2016, the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (the “Antitrust Division”) filed criminal charges against two former executives from a competitor of the Company for their roles in conspiracies to fix prices, rig bidsindividuals, and allocate customers for certain generic drugs.related media reports.


On May 2, 2017, we disclosed that search warrants were executed at a number ofseveral Perrigo facilities and other locations in connection with the Antitrust Division’s ongoing investigation related to drug pricing in the pharmaceutical industry. Perrigo has also been served with and responded to a civil investigative demand in connection with a related civil False Claims Act investigation by the Civil Division of the Department of Justice. Although no charges or other related civil claims have been brought to date against Perrigo or any of our current employees (or, to the best of our knowledge, former employees), by the Department of Justice, we take the investigation very seriously.


If criminal antitrust charges are filed involving Perrigo, we would incur substantial litigation and other costs, and could face substantial monetary penalties, injunctive relief, negative publicity and damage to our reputation. Regardless of the ultimate outcome, responding to those charges would divert management’s time and attention and could impair our operations. Further, we cannot predict whether legislative or regulatory changes may result from the ongoing public scrutiny of our industry, what the nature of any such changes might be, or what impact they may have on Perrigo. Any of these developments could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, and reputation.

We are cooperating with the government’s investigation and are committed While we intend to operating our business in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and the highest standards of ethical conduct. We do not condone, and will not countenance, any violation of these standards by our employees, agents, and business partners.

Publishing earnings guidance subjects us to risks, including increased stock volatility that could lead to potential lawsuits by investors.

Because we publish earnings guidance, we are subject to a number of risks. Actual results may vary from the guidance we provide investors from time to time, such that our stock price may decline following, among other things, any earnings release or guidance that does not meet market expectations. 

It has become increasingly commonplace for investors to file lawsuits against companies following a rapid decrease in market capitalization. We have been in the past, and may be in the future, nameddefend Perrigo's conduct at issue in these types of lawsuits. These types of lawsuits can be costly and divert management attention and other resources away from our business, regardless of their merits, and could result ininvestigations vigorously, any adverse settlements or judgments, whichdecision could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and reputation.

In addition, we have been named as a co-defendant with certain other generic pharmaceutical manufacturers in a number of class action, individual plaintiff direct action, State Attorney General, and county lawsuits alleging that we engaged in anti-competitive behavior to fix or raise the Company.prices of certain drugs starting, in some instances, as early as calendar year 2010. Refer to Item 8. Note 19. While we intend to defend these lawsuits vigorously, any adverse decision could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and reputation.


Third-party patents and other intellectual property rights may limit our ability to bring new products to market and may subject us to potential legal liability, causing us to incur significant costs.which could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.


The manufacture, use and sale of new products that are the subject of conflicting patent rights have been the subject of substantial litigation in the pharmaceutical industry.


Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

As a manufacturer of generic pharmaceutical products, the ability of our CHCACSCA and RXCSCI segments to bring new products to market is often limited by third-party patents or proprietary rights and regulatory exclusivity periods awarded on products. Launching new products prior to resolution of intellectual property issues may result in us incurring legal liability if the related litigation is later resolved against us. The cost and time for us to develop prescription and Rx-to-OTC switch products is significantly greater than the rest of the new products that we introduce. Any failure to bring new products to market in a timely manner could cause us to lose market share, and our operating results could suffer.

We could have to defend against charges that we violatedinfringed patents or violated proprietary rights of third parties. This could require us to incur substantial expense and could divert significant effort of our technical and management personnel. If we are found to have infringed on the rights of others, we could lose our right to develop or manufacture some products or could be required to pay monetary damages or royalties to license proprietary rights from third parties. Additionally, if we choose to settle a dispute through licensing or similar arrangements, the costs associated with these arrangements may be substantial and could include ongoing royalties. An adverse determination in a judicial or administrative proceeding or failure to obtain necessary licenses could prevent us from manufacturing and selling a number of our products.
At times, our CHCA or RX segmentsCSCA segment may seek approval to market drug products before the expiration of a third party's patents for thosetherapeutically-equivalent products, based upon our belief that such patents are invalid, unenforceable or would not be infringed by our products. In these cases, we may face significant patent litigation. Depending upon a complex analysis of a variety of legal and commercial factors, we may, in
38

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors
certain circumstances, elect to market a store brand or generic pharmaceutical product while litigation is pending, before any court decision, or while an appeal of a lower court decision is pending, known as an "at risk" launch. The risk involved in an "at risk" launch can be substantial because, if a patent holder ultimately prevails, the remedies available to the patent holder may include, among other things, damages measured by the profits lost by the holder, which are often significantly higher than the profits we make from selling the generic version of the product. By electing to proceed in this manner, we could face substantial damages if we receive an adverse final court decision. In the case where a patent holder is able to prove that our infringement was "willful" or "exceptional," under applicable law, the patent holder may be awarded up to three times the amount of its actual damages or we may be required to pay attorneys’ fees.

The success of certain of our products depends on the effectiveness of measures we take to protect our intellectual property rights and patents.
    
If we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property, competitors may manufacture and market similar products.


We have been issued patents covering certain of our products, and we have filed, and expect to continue to file, patent applications seeking to protect newly developed technologies and products in various countries. Any existing or future patents issued to or licensed by us may not provide us with any significant competitive advantages for our products or may even be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented by competitors. In addition, patent rights may not prevent our competitors from developing, using, or commercializing non-infringing products that are similar or functionally equivalent to our products.

We also rely on trade secrets, unpatented proprietary know-how, and continuing technological innovation that we seek to protect, in part by confidentiality agreements with licensees, suppliers, employees, and consultants. If these agreements are breached, we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach. Disputes may arise concerning the ownership of intellectual property or the applicability of confidentiality agreements. Furthermore, trade secrets and proprietary technology may otherwise become known or be independently developed by competitors or, if patents are not issued with respect to products arising from research, we may not be able to maintain the value of such intellectual property rights.


Perrigo Company plc- Item 1AOur ability to achieve operating results in line with published guidance is inherently subject to numerous risks and other factors beyond our control. Publishing earnings guidance subjects us to risks, including increased stock volatility, that could lead to potential lawsuits by investors.
Risk Factors


Because we publish earnings guidance, we are subject to several risks. Earnings guidance is inherently uncertain and subject to factors beyond our control. Actual results may vary from the guidance we provide investors from time to time, such that our stock price may decline following, among other things, any earnings release or guidance that does not meet market expectations. 

It has become increasingly commonplace for investors to file lawsuits against companies following a rapid decrease in market capitalization. We have been in the past, are currently, and may be in the future, named in these types of lawsuits. These types of lawsuits can be costly and divert management attention and other resources away from our business, regardless of their merits, and could result in adverse settlements or judgments. The inherent uncertainty of earnings guidance and related lawsuits could have a material impact on us.

Significant increases in the cost or decreases in the availability of the insurance we maintain could adversely impact our operating results and financial condition. Disputes with insurers on the scope of existing policies may limit the coverage available under such policies.

To protect the Companyus against various potential liabilities, we maintain a variety of insurance programs, including property, general, and product, and directors' and officers' liability. We may reevaluate and change the types and levels of insurance coverage that we purchase. WeInsurance costs, including deductible or retention amounts, may increase, or our coverage could be reduced, which could lead to an adverse effect on our financial results depending on the nature of a loss and the level of insurance coverage we maintained. Moreover, we are self-insured when insurance is not available, not offered at economically reasonable premiums or does not available at reasonable premiums. Risks associated with insurance plans include:
Insurance costs could increase significantly, or the availability of insurance may decrease, either of which could adversely impact our financial condition;
Deductible or retention amounts could increase or our coverage could be reduced in the future and to the extent losses occur, there could be an adverse effect on our financial results depending on the nature of the loss and the level of insurance coverage we maintained (refer to Item 8. Note 16 for further information related to legal proceedings);
Product liability insurance may not be available to us at an economically reasonable cost (or at all for certain specific products) or our insurance may not adequately cover our liability in connection with product liability claims (refer to Item 8. Note 16 for further information related to legal proceedings); and
As ouradequately cover claims brought against us. Our business inherently exposes us to claims, for injuries allegedly resulting from the use of our products, we may become subject to claims for which we are not adequately insured. Unanticipatedand an unanticipated payment of a large claim may have a material adverse effect on our business.

39

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors
Disputes with insurers on the scope of existing policies may reduce the coverage available under such policies. In May 2021, insurers on multiple policies of D&O insurance filed an action in the High Court in Dublin against us and our current and former directors and officers seeking declaratory judgments on certain coverage issues. If successful, such claims would limit the policies available to Perrigo for certain pending securities claims, as well as claims for legal expenses relating to certain matters that were previously resolved, and could reduce substantially Perrigo’s total insurance coverage for such claims.

Tax Related Risks


The resolution of uncertain tax positions, including the Notices of Proposed Adjustments and ongoing disputes with U.S. Internal Revenue Service ("IRS")and foreign tax authorities, could be unfavorable, which could have an adverse effect on our business.

Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable and our tax filings are prepared in accordance with applicable tax laws, the final determination with respect to any tax audit or any related litigation could be materially different from our estimates or from our historical income tax provisions and accruals. The results of an audit or litigation could have a material effect on operating results or cash flows in the periods for which that determination is made and in future periods after the determination. In addition, future period earnings may be adversely impacted by litigation costs, settlements, penalties or interest assessments.

We are currently involved in several audits and adjustment-related disputes and related litigation, including the NOPAs, as described more fully in Item 8. Note 17. Based on a review of the relevant facts and circumstances, we believe that these matters will not agreeresult in a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, while we believe that our position in these matters is correct, there can be no assurance of ultimate favorable outcomes, and if one or more matters are ultimately resolved unfavorably it would have a material adverse impact on us, including a material adverse impact on our financial position, liquidity, capital resources, and strategy. In addition, an adverse result with respect to any of such matters could ultimately require the conclusion that we are treateduse of corporate assets to pay assessments and related interest, penalties, or other amounts, and any such use of corporate assets would limit the assets available for other corporate purposes. We will consider the financial statement impact of any additional facts as they become available.    

Changes to tax laws and regulations or the interpretation thereof could have a foreign corporation for U.S. federalmaterial adverse effect on our results of operations and the ability to utilize cash in a tax purposes.efficient manner.


Although we are incorporated in Ireland, the IRS may assert that we should be treated as a U.S. corporation (and, therefore, a U.S. tax resident) for U.S. federal tax purposes pursuant to section 7874 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Code"). For U.S. federal tax purposes, a corporation generally is considered a tax resident in the jurisdiction of its organization or incorporation. Because we are an Irish incorporated entity, we would generally be classified as a foreign corporation (and, therefore, a non-U.S. tax resident) under these rules. Section 7874 of the Code provides an exception under which a foreign incorporated entity may, in certain circumstances, be treated as a U.S. corporation for U.S. federal tax purposes.

For Perrigo Company plc Refer to be treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. federal tax purposes under section 7874 of the Code, either (i) the former stockholders of Perrigo Company must own (within the meaning of section 7874 of the Code) less than 80% (by both vote and value) of our stock by reason of holding shares in Perrigo Company (the "ownership test") as of the closing of the Elan acquisition or (ii) we must have substantial business activities in Ireland after the Elan acquisition (taking into account the activities of our expanded affiliated group).

Upon our acquisition of Elan, Perrigo Company stockholders held 71% (by both vote and value) of our shares. As a result, we believe that under current law, we should be treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. federal tax purposes. However, we cannot assure that the IRS will agree with our position that the ownership test is satisfied. There is limited guidance regarding the section 7874 provisions, including the application of the ownership test. An unfavorable determination on Perrigo Company plc’s treatment as a foreign corporation under section 7874 of the Code could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements in future periods.

Based on the limited guidance available, we currently expect that Section 7874 of the Code likely will limit our and our U.S. affiliates’ ability to use their U.S. tax attributes, such as net operating losses, to offset certain U.S. taxable income, if any, generated by the Elan acquisition or certain specified transactions for a period of time following the Elan acquisition (refer to Item 8, Note 141. Business - Government Regulation and Pricing).


Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

Changes to tax laws could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and the ability to utilize cash in a tax efficient manner.

We believe that under current law, we should be treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. federal tax purposes. However, any ofthere is limited guidance regarding the following could adversely affect our statussection 7874 provisions. An unfavorable determination on Perrigo Company plc’s treatment as a foreign corporation for U.S. federal tax purposes:

Changesunder section 7874 of the Code or changes to the inversion rules in section 7874 of the Code, the IRS Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, or other IRS guidance;guidance and
Legislative legislative proposals aimed at expanding the scope of U.S. corporate tax residence.

On April 4, 2016, the United States Treasury ("Treasury") and the IRS issued a package of temporary regulations that incorporate the guidance promised in the 2014 and 2015 notices and provide other rules. These temporary regulations are generally effective for certain inversion transactions completed on or after November 19, 2015 or, in certain cases, to certain specified post-inversion transactions occurring after that date provided that an inversion transaction had occurred on or after September 22, 2014. We do not believe that those regulations would apply to our transaction, which occurred prior to those effective dates. Treasury and the IRS also issued final regulations on June 3, 2015, which address the “substantial business activities” test of Section 7874 of the Code. We believe that those regulations, which have an effective date of June 4, 2015, also do not impact the treatment ofresidence could adversely affect our status as a foreign corporation under Section 7874, as our transaction also occurred prior to the effective date of those final regulations.

On October 16, 2016, Treasury released final regulations regarding corporatefor U.S. federal tax inversions and related earnings stripping. These final regulations include provisions that may be interpreted to impact otherwise common tax structures including intercompany financing and obligations. We believe that these regulations do not materially impact our intercompany financing and obligations. Treasury has indicated that they will continue to study certain portions of the proposed regulations that were not finalized, and we will evaluate the impacts of any additional guidance or regulations to our cross-border treasury management practices and intercompany financing structures at that time. We have no assurance that such guidance, if any, will not impact our ability to utilize existing or similar structures in the future.

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, which represents a coalition of member countries, has recommended changes to numerous long-standing tax principles relating to Base Erosion and Profit Shifting ("BEPS"). These changes are being adopted and implemented by many of the countries in which we do business and may increase our taxes in these countries. In addition, the European Commission has launched several initiatives to implement BEPS actions including an anti-tax avoidance directive ("ATADI & II") and having a common (consolidated) corporate tax base. It is unclear at present if and how these initiatives will be implemented by the EU countries. Specifically, Ireland is embarking on a consultation process to implement the ATAD & II directives and BEPS related measures. The shape of this reform may adversely impact our consolidated effective tax rate.

On December 25, 2017, Belgium enacted a tax reform bill (“Belgium Tax Act”) providing for a simplified tax system including, among other items, a corporate income tax rate reduction from 33% to 29% in 2018 (and to 25% from 2020) and an increase in the participation exemption on qualifying dividends from 95% to 100% (refer to Item 8, Note 14 for further information related to the Belgium Tax Act).
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“U.S. Tax Act”). The U.S. Tax Act includes a number of significant changes to existing U.S. tax laws that impact us. These changes include a corporate income tax rate reduction from 35% to 21% and the elimination or reduction of certain U.S. deductions and credits, including limitations on the deductibility of interest expense and executive compensation. The U.S. Tax Act also transitions international taxation from a worldwide system to a modified territorial system. This modified territorial system includes, among other items, base erosion prevention measures which have the effect of subjecting certain earnings of our U.S. owned foreign corporations to U.S. taxation as global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) and the establishment of a minimum tax on certain payments from our U.S. subsidiaries to related foreign persons as base erosion and anti-abuse tax (“BEAT”). These changes are effective beginning in 2018. The U.S. Tax Act also includes a one-time mandatory deemed repatriation tax on accumulated U.S. owned foreign
Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

corporations’ previously untaxed foreign earnings (“Transition Toll Tax”). The Transition Toll Tax will be paid over an eight-year period starting in 2018 and will not accrue interest.

Our preliminary estimate of the impact of the U.S. Tax Act (including the Transition Toll Tax) is subject to the finalization of management's analysis related to certain matters, such as developing interpretations of the provisions of the U.S. Tax Act, changes to certain estimates and amounts related to the earnings and profits of certain U.S. owned foreign subsidiaries and the filing of our tax returns. U.S. Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions interpreting the U.S. Tax Act may require further adjustments and changes in our estimates,purposes, which could have a material adverse effectimpact on our business, resultsConsolidated Financial Statements in future periods.

Additionally, we are subject to tax laws in various jurisdictions globally. Refer to Item 1. Business - Government Regulation and Pricing for a discussion of operations or financial conditions. The final determination of the impact of therecent changes to U.S. Tax Act (including the Transition Toll Tax) will be completed as additional information becomes available, but no later than one year from the enactment of the U.S. Tax Act (refer to Item 8, Note 14 for further information related to the U.S. Tax Act).

and EU tax laws. Any of these changes could have a prospective or retroactive application to us, our shareholders, and affiliates, and could adversely affect us by changing our effective tax rate and limiting our ability to utilize cash in a tax efficient manner.


40

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors
Our effective tax rate or cash tax payment requirements may change in the future, which could adversely impact our future results fromof operations.


A number of factors may adversely impact our future effective tax ratesrate or cash tax payment requirements, which may impact our future results and cash flows from operations (referoperations. Refer toItem 8. Note 1417for further information related to Income Taxes). These factors include, but are not limited to:

Changes changes to income tax rates, to tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws (including additional proposals for fundamental international tax reform)reform globally);
Income tax rate changes by governments;
The the jurisdictions in which our profits are determined to be earned and taxed;
Changes changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities;
Adjustments adjustments to estimated taxes upon finalization of various tax returns;
Adjustments adjustments to our interpretation of transfer pricing standards, treatment or characterization of intercompany transactions, changes in available tax credits, grants and other incentives;
Changes changes in stock-based compensation expense;
Changes changes in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles;
Expiration expiration or the inability to renew tax rulings or tax holiday incentives;
Divestitures and divestitures of current operations; andoperations.
Repatriation of non-U.S. earnings with respect to which we have not previously provided for U.S. taxes.

The resolution of uncertain tax positions could be unfavorable, which could have an adverse effect on our business.

Although we believe that our tax estimates are reasonable and that our tax filings are prepared in accordance with all applicable tax laws, the final determination with respect to any tax audit or any related litigation could be materially different from our estimates or from our historical income tax provisions and accruals. The results of an audit or litigation could have a material effect on operating results or cash flows in the periods for which that determination is made and in future periods after the determination. In addition, future period earnings may be adversely impacted by litigation costs, settlements, penalties or interest assessments.

We are currently involved in several audit and adjustment related disputes, including litigation, with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). These include litigation regarding our 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012 tax years, as well as proposed audit adjustments related to litigation costs and transfer pricing positions related to Athena Neurosciences, Inc. (“Athena”), a subsidiary of Elan acquired in 1996, for the 2011, 2012 and 2013 tax years.

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

At this time, we cannot predict the outcome of any audit or related litigation. Unfavorable resolutions of the audit matters discussed above could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements in future periods. (refer to Item 8. Note 14 for further information related to uncertain tax positions and ongoing tax audits and Item 8. Note 16 for further information related to legal proceedings).

Risks Related to Capital and Liquidity Risks

Our historical failure to timely file our periodic reports with the SEC may limit our options in accessing the public markets to raise debt or equity capital, which in turn may limit our ability to pursue future transactions or strategies.

We did not timely file our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 or our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 1, 2017. As a result, there currently are limits on our ability to access the public markets. For example, we are not eligible to use Form S-3 until we establish the required history of making timely filings for twelve full calendar months. The ability to use Form S-3 to register public offerings in the United States offers certain benefits, such as relatively lower costs and shorter time-frames to prepare a registration statement and cause it to become effective, which may enhance our ability to take advantage of positive market conditions as they develop. The limited availability of access to the public markets could increase the time and costs related to raising capital or prevent us from pursuing transactions or implementing future business strategies. We expect we will again become eligible to use Form S-3 as of June 1, 2018; however, any failure by us to timely file one or more of our periodic reports or otherwise remain current in our SEC reporting requirements may further inhibit our ability to access the public markets.


Our indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to implement our strategic initiatives.


We anticipate that cash, cash equivalents, cash flows from operations, and borrowings available under our credit facilities will substantially fund working capital and capital expenditures. Our business requires continuous capital investments, and there can be no assurance that financial capital will always be available on favorable terms or at all. Additionally, our leverage and debt service obligations could adversely affect the business. At December 31, 2017,2021, our total indebtedness outstanding was $3.3$3.5 billion.


Our senior credit facilities, the agreements governing our senior notes, and agreements governing our other indebtedness contain a number of restrictions and covenants that limit our ability to make distributions or other payments to our investors and creditors, or repurchase our shares, unless certain financial tests or other criteria are satisfied.
We also must comply with certain These covenants include specified financial ratios and tests. These restrictionstests, which could affect our ability to operate our business and mayor limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities, such as acquisitions. If we do not comply with the covenants and restrictions contained in our senior credit facilities,the agreements governing our senior notes, and agreements governing our other indebtedness, we could be in default under those agreements, and the debt, together with accrued interest, could then be declared immediately due and payable. For example, during the three months ended December 31, 2021, we received a waiver for non-compliance with the leverage covenant as of December 3, 2021 from the lenders under both credit facilities and entered into an amendment to each of the 2018 Revolver and 2019 Term Loan. Under such amendments, the maximum leverage ratio was increased to 5.75 to 1.00 for the fourth quarter of 2021 and the first quarter of 2022, returning to 3.75 to 1.00 beginning with the second quarter of 2022. If we consummate certain qualifying acquisitions in the fourth quarter of 2021 or any subsequent quarter during the term of the loan, the maximum ratio would increase to 4.00 to 1.00 for such quarter.

AnyA default under our senior credit facilities or agreements governing our senior notes or othercertain indebtedness could lead to an acceleration of debt under other debt instruments that contain cross-acceleration or cross-default provisions. If our indebtedness is accelerated, there can be no assurance that we would be able to repay or refinance our debt or obtain sufficient new financing.

DowngradesDuring the third quarter of 2021, our credit ratings were downgraded by Moody’s and S&P Global Ratings to Ba1 (negative) and BB (stable), respectively, which are not investment grade ratings. On December 31, 2021, our credit rating was BBB- (negative) by Fitch Ratings Inc., which is an investment grade rating. Future downgrades to our credit ratings may limit our access to capital and materially increase borrowing costs on current or future financing, including via trade payables with vendors. Customers' inclination to purchase goods from us may also be affected by the publicity associated with deterioration of our credit ratings.

There are various maturity dates associated with our credit facilities, senior notes, and other debt facilities. There is no assurance that cash, future borrowings or equity financing will be available for the payment or refinancing of our indebtedness. Further, there is no assurance that any future refinancing or renegotiation of our senior credit facilities, senior notes or other debt facilities, or additional agreements will not have materially different or more stringent terms. Refer toItem 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
There are various maturity dates associated with our credit facilities, senior notes, and other debt facilities. There is no assurance that cash, future borrowings or equity financing will be available for the payment or refinancing of our indebtedness. Further, there is no assurance that future refinancing or renegotiation of our senior credit facilities, senior notes or other debt facilities, or additional agreements will not have materially different or more stringent terms (refer toItem 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations).

41

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors


We cannot guarantee that we will buy back our ordinary shares pursuant to our announced share repurchase plan or that our share repurchase plan will enhance long-term shareholder value.

In October 2015,2018 our Board of Directors authorized a $2.0up to $1.0 billion three-yearof share repurchases with no expiration date, subject to the Board of Directors’ approval of the pricing parameters and amount that may be repurchased under each specific share repurchase plan.program. During the three monthsyear ended December 31, 2015, we repurchased shares through the plan totaling $500.0 million. During 2016,2021, we did not purchaserepurchase any shares in the open market. During 2017, we repurchased $191.5 million worth of shares.under such authorization. The specific timing and amount of additional buybacks under the authorization, if any, will depend upon several factors, including market and business conditions, the trading price of our ordinary shares, and the nature of other investment opportunities. opportunities and the availability of our distributable reserves. In particular, following our credit agreement amendments in December 2021, until June 30, 2022, we are limited to repurchasing $50.0 million of common shares unless our leverage ratio for the trailing four quarters does not exceed 3.75 to 1. In addition, our ability to repurchase shares may be limited in the future under Irish law, if at any time we do not have sufficient distributable reserves.

Buybacks of our ordinary shares pursuant to our share repurchase plan could affect the market price of our ordinary shares, or increase their volatility. Additionally, our share repurchase plan couldvolatility or diminish our cash reserves, which may impact our ability to finance future growth and to pursue possible future strategic opportunities and acquisitions. Although our share repurchase plan is intended to enhance long-term shareholder value, there is no assurance that it will do so, and short-term share price fluctuations could reduce the plan’s effectiveness.

Any additional shares we may issue could dilute your ownership in the Company.


Under Irish law, our authorized share capital can be increased by an ordinary resolution of our shareholders, and the directors may issue new ordinary or preferred shares up to a maximum amount equal to the authorized but unissued share capital, without shareholder approval, once authorized to do so by the articles of association or by an ordinary resolution of our shareholders.


Subject to specified exceptions, Irish law grants statutory preemption rights to existing shareholders to subscribe for new issuances of shares for cash, but allows shareholders to authorize the waiver of the statutory preemption rights either in our articles of association or by way of a special resolution withresolution. Such disapplication of these preemption rights can either be generally applicable or be in respect to anyof a particular allotment of shares.


Our articlesAt our annual general meeting of association contain, as permitted by Irish company law, a provision authorizingshareholders in May 2021, our shareholders authorized our Board of Directors to issue newup to a maximum of 33% of our issued ordinary capital on that date for a period of 18 months from the passing of the resolution. At the annual general meeting, our shareholders also authorized our Board of Directors to issue ordinary shares on a nonpreemptive basis in the following circumstances: (i) an issuance of shares in connection with any rights issuance and (ii) an issuance of shares for cash, without offering preemption rights. The authorizationif the issuance is limited to up to 5% of the directors to issue shares andCompany’s issued ordinary share capital (with the authorizationpossibility of issuing an additional 5% of the waiverCompany’s issued ordinary share capital provided the Company uses it only in connection with an acquisition or a specified capital investment that is announced contemporaneously with the issuance, or which has taken place in the preceding six-month period and is disclosed in the announcement of the statutory preemption rights must both be renewed byissuance), bringing the shareholders at least every five years, and we cannot provide any assurance that these authorizations will always be approved, which couldtotal acceptable limit our abilityfor nonpreemptive share issuances for cash to issue equity and thereby adversely affect10% of the holders of our securities.Company’s issued ordinary share capital.


We are incorporated in Ireland; Irish law differs from the laws in effect in the United States and may afford less protection to, or otherwise adversely affect, our shareholders.
As an Irish company, we are governed by the Irish Companies Act 2014 (the "Act"). The Act differs in some material respects from laws generally applicable to U.S. corporations and shareholders, including the provisions relating to interested directors, mergers, amalgamations and acquisitions, takeovers, shareholder lawsuits, and indemnification of directors.


Under Irish law, the duties of directors and officers of a company are generally owed to the company only. As a result, shareholders of Irish companies do not have the right to bring an action against the directors or officers of a company for the breach of such duties, except in limited circumstances.

Depending on the circumstances, shareholdersShareholders may be subject to different or additional tax consequences under Irish law as a result of the acquisition, ownership and/or disposition of ordinary shares, including, but not limited to, Irish stamp duty, dividend withholding tax, Irish income tax, and capital acquisitions tax.

There is no treaty between Ireland and the U.S. providing for the reciprocal enforcement of foreign judgments. Before a foreign judgment would be deemed enforceable in Ireland, the judgment must be (i) for a definite sum, (ii) provided by a court of competent jurisdiction and be for a(iii) final and conclusive sum.conclusive. An Irish courtHigh
42

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors
Court may exercise its right to refuse to recognize and enforce a foreign judgment if the foreign judgment was obtained by fraud, if it violated Irish public policy, if it is in breach of natural justice, or if it is irreconcilable with an earlier judgment.

Perrigo Company plc- Item 1A
Risk Factors

An Irish courtHigh Court may stay proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere. Judgments of U.S. courts of liabilities predicated upon U.S. federal securities laws may not be enforced by Irish courtsHigh Courts if deemed to be contrary to public policy in Ireland.

We are subject to Irish takeover rules under which our Board of Directors is not permitted to take any action without shareholder or Irish Takeover Panelapproval that might frustrate an offer for our ordinary shares once we have received an approach that may lead to an offer, or have reason to believe an offer is or may be imminent. Further, itIt could be more difficult for us to obtain shareholder approval for a merger or negotiated transaction than if we were a U.S. company because the shareholder approval requirements for certain types of transactions differ, and in some cases are greater, under Irish law.

Additionally, under the Irish Takeover Panel Act, 1997, Takeover Rules, 2013, the Board of Directors is not permitted to take any action that might frustrate an offer for our ordinary shares, including issuing additional ordinary shares or convertible equity, making material acquisitions or dispositions, or entering into contracts outside the ordinary course of business, once the Board of Directors has received an approach that may lead to an offer or has reason to believe that such an offer is or may be imminent, subject to certain exceptions. These provisions may give the Board of Directors less ability to control negotiations with hostile offerors and protect the interests of holders of ordinary shares than would be the case for a corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction of the United States.

We may be limited in our ability to pay dividends in the future.


A number of factors may limit our ability to pay dividends, in the future, including:including, among other things:


The availability of distributable reserves, as approved by our shareholders and the Irish High Court;

Our ability to receive cash dividends and distributions from our subsidiaries;

Compliance with applicable laws and debt covenants; and

Our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, general business conditions, and other factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant.relevant; and

The availability of our distributable reserves, being profits of the company available for distribution to shareholders.

Under Irish law, distributable reserves are the accumulated realized profits so far as not previously utilized by distribution or capitalization, less accumulated realized losses so far as not previously written off in a reduction or a reorganization of capital duly made. In addition, no distribution or dividend may be made if, at the time of the distribution or dividend, our net assets are not, or would not be, after giving effect to such distribution or dividend, be equal to, or in excess of, the aggregate of our called-up share capital plus undistributable reserves.

While we currently expect to continue paying dividends, significant changes in our business or financial condition such as asset impairments, sustained operating losses and the selling of assets, could impact the amount of distributable reserves available to us. We could seek to create additional distributable reserves through a reduction in our share premium, which would require 75% shareholder approval and the approval of the Irish High Court. The Irish High Court's approval is a matter for the discretion of the court, and there can be no assurances that such approval would be obtained. In the event that additional distributable reserves are not created in this way, dividends, share repurchases or other distributions would generally not be permitted under Irish law until such time as we have created sufficient distributable reserves in our audited statutory financial statements as a result of our business activities.

Additionally, we are subject to financial covenants in our 2018 Revolver and 2019 Term Loan, including a maximum leverage ratio covenant. Recent amendments to the 2018 Revolver and 2019 Term Loan modified certain provisions related to restricted payments to account for an amended leverage ratio covenant. Refer to Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis under Waiver and Amendment of Debt Covenants, for more information. Under such modifications, prior to June 30, 2022, we are required to meet a leverage ratio of 3.75 to 1.0 before making certain payments concerning our equity interests, such as dividends (except our regular dividend) or share repurchases.

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.


43

Perrigo Company plc - Item 2

ITEM 2.PROPERTIES
ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES
Our world headquarters is located in Dublin, Ireland, and our North American base of operations is located in Allegan, Michigan. We manufacture products at 2820 worldwide locations and have R&D, logistics, and office support facilities in many of the regions in which we operate. We own approximately 72%80% of our facilities and lease the remainder. Our primary facilities by geographic area were as follows at December 31, 2017:
2021:
CountryNumber of FacilitiesSegment(s) Supported
Ireland1CSCA, CSCI
United States43CSCA, CSCI
Mexico9CSCA
France6CSCI
United Kingdom5CSCI
China4CSCA, CSCI
Belgium4CSCI
Austria3CSCI
CountryGermanyNumber of Facilities3Segment(s) SupportedCSCI
Australia2CSCI
Ireland1CHCA, CHCI, RX
United States44CHCA, RX, Other
Mexico9CHCA
United Kingdom7CHCI
France6CHCI
Belgium4CHCI
Austria4CHCI
Australia3CHCI
Israel3CHCA, CHCI, RX
India2CHCA
Germany2CHCI
Switzerland2CHCI
Italy1CHCI
Portugal1CHCI

Perrigo Company plc - Item 2



We believe that our production facilities are adequate to support the business, and our property and equipment are well maintained. Our manufacturing plants are suitable for their intended purposes and have capacities for current and near term projected needs of our existing products.


ITEM 3.
ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


Information regarding our current legal proceedings is presented in Item 8. Note 1619.


ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

ITEM 4.    MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.


44

Perrigo Company plc - Additional Item
Executive Officers



ADDITIONAL ITEM. INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT


Our executive officers and their ages and positions as of February 23, 201825, 2022 were:
Title and Business ExperienceAge
Svend AndersenMr. Andersen was named Executive Vice President and President, Consumer HealthcareSelf-Care International in February 2017. Prior to joining Perrigo in May 2016, Mr. Andersen served as Executive Vice President - Europe for LEO-Pharma from December 2015 to May 2016. Prior to that, he was Regional President and Corporate officer at Hospira, Inc.’s Europe, Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”) business for five years, was Executive Vice President responsible for the Western European division’s pharmaceuticals, generics, OTC and hospital products businesses at Actavis from 2008 to 2015 including leading Alpharma’s EMEA businesses prior to its acquisition by Actavis, and prior to that, spent 10 years with Ferrosan (A Novo Nordisk Subsidiary) specialized in OTC and consumer health products as Vice President for Global Commercial Operations.5660
James E. Dillard IIIJames E. Dillard III was named Executive Vice President and President, Consumer Self-Care International in October 2021. Mr. Dillard previously served as Executive Vice President, Chief Scientific Officer from January 2019 until October 2021. Mr. Dillard joined Perrigo from Altria Group, Inc., where he served as Senior Vice President, Research, Development and Sciences and Chief Innovation Officer from January 2009 to May 2018. During his tenure with Altria Group, Mr. Dillard led the creation of the Regulatory Affairs function in 2009 and also served as Chief Innovation Officer for Altria Client Services and Senior Vice President of Research, Development & Regulatory Affairs for Altria Group. He held science and technology leadership roles with U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company, an Altria Group Inc. operating company, from 2001 to 2009. Mr. Dillard worked for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration between 1987 and 2001 as Director of the Division of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Devices, as well as in various leadership roles in the Center for Devices and Radiological Health and the Office of Device Evaluation.58
Thomas M. FarringtonMr. Farrington was named Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer in November 2015. He formerly served as Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer from October 2006 to November 2015.6064
Ronald C. JanishMr. Janish was named Chief Transformation Officer in January 2019 and Executive Vice President of Global Operations and Supply Chain in October 2015. He served as Senior Vice President of International and RxRX Operations from 2012 until 2015 and as Managing Director of Perrigo’s Australian operations from 2010 to 2012. Previously, he held Senior Vice President roles for Perrigo in International Market Development, China Business Development and Global Procurement.5256
Murray S. KesslerMr. Kessler was appointed President, Chief Executive Officer and Board Member of Perrigo Company plc, effective October 8, 2018. Before joining Perrigo, Mr. Kessler served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of Lorillard, Inc. from 2010 to 2015. He served as Vice Chair of Altria, Inc. in 2009 and President and CEO of UST, Inc. from 2000 to 2009, a wholly owned subsidiary. Previous to his time at UST, Mr. Kessler had over 18 years of consumer-packaged goods experience with companies including Vlasic Foods International, Campbell Soup and The Clorox Company. In addition to his board service at Lorillard, Mr. Kessler previously served on the board of directors of Reynolds-American, Inc. from 2015 to 2017. Mr. Kessler has served as voluntary President of the United States Equestrian Federation from 2015 to January 2021.62
Todd W. KingmaMr. Kingma was named Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in May 2006. He served as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from August 2003 to May 2006.5862
Sharon KochanMr. Kochan was named Executive Vice President and President, Branded Consumer Healthcare and International in February 2017. He served as Executive Vice President and General Manager, Consumer Healthcare International from August 2012 to February 2017. He served as Executive Vice President, General Manager of Prescription Pharmaceuticals from March 2007 to July 2012 and as Senior Vice President of Business Development and Strategy from March 2005 to March 2007. Mr. Kochan was Vice President, Business Development of Agis Industries (1983) Ltd. from July 2001 until the acquisition of Agis by the Company in March 2005.49
James R. MichaudMr. Michaud was named Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer in August 2016. In 2014, Mr. Michaud was President of Human Resources Strategies, a consulting company focused on providing business based human resource strategies to a wide variety of companies in multiple industries. His corporate career spanned senior human resource roles in Alcoa, Arcelor Mittal Steel, and most recently, Cliffs Natural Resources, where he served as Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer from 2010 to 2014.62
Jeffrey R. NeedhamMr. Needham was named Executive Vice President and President of Consumer Healthcare Americas in October 2009. He served as Senior Vice President of Commercial Business Development for Consumer Healthcare from March 2005 through October 2009. Previously, he served as Senior Vice President of International from November 2004 to March 2005. He served as Managing Director of Perrigo’s U.K. operations from May 2002 to November 2004 and as Vice President of Marketing from 1993 to 2002.61
Grainne QuinnMs.Dr. Quinn was named Executive Vice President in July 2016 and has served as Chief Medical Officer since November 2015. Prior to that she served as Vice President and Head of Global Patient Safety from January 2014 until November 2015. Dr. Quinn was Vice President and Head of Global Pharmacovigilance and Risk Management for Elan from April 2009 until December 2013 when the Company acquired Elan.4852
Uwe F. RoehrhoffRaymond P. SilcockMr. RoehrhoffSilcock was appointednamed Executive Vice President and Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer and Board Member effective January 15, 2018.in March 2019. Prior to joining Perrigo, Mr. RoehrhoffSilcock served as Chief Financial Officer at INW Holdings from 2018 to 2019 and as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Gerresheimer AG,CTI Foods from 2016 to 2018. In March 2019, CTI Foods filed a leading global manufacturervoluntary petition under Chapter 11 of pharmaceutical packaging productsthe U.S. Bankruptcy Code in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware. From 2013 until the company’s sale in 2016, Mr. Silcock was Executive Vice President and medical devices for storage, dosageChief Financial Officer of Diamond Foods, Inc. and safe administrationpreviously held Chief Financial Officer roles at UST, Inc., Swift & Co. and Cott Corporation. He also served on the board of drugs. He began his career with Gerresheimer AG in 1991 and steadily advanced to serve in a number of key leadership roles in Europe and North America, including leading the American subsidiary Gerresheimer GlassPinnacle Foods, Inc. from 2001 to 2010. He served as2008 until the company was sold in 2018. His early career was highlighted by an executive board member from 2003 to 2017, responsible for two18-year tenure in positions of increasing responsibility at Campbell Soup Company. Mr. Silcock is a Fellow of the company’s three business units, and CEOChartered Institute of Gerresheimer AG from 2010 until his retirement in August 2017. Mr. Roehrhoff served as Audit Committee Chairman on the Board of Directors of Catalent, Inc. from February 2017 to February 2018 and as deputy chairman of Klöckner&Co SE since May 2017.Management Accountants (UK).5571
Paul Weninger
Robert WillisMr. WeningerWillis was named Executive Vice President of Global Quality Operationsand Chief Human Resources Officer in December 2015. He servedMarch 2019 after serving as Senior Vice President, U.S. Quality Operations from 2013 to 2015; Vice President, Consumer Healthcare and Rx Quality Operations, U.S. and Asia Pacific from 2010 to 2013; Vice President, Global CHC Quality Operations from 2007 to 2010.54
John WesolowskiMr. Wesolowski was named Executive Vice President, President RX in November 2016. He previously was named as Acting General Manager, RX, in July 2016 and served in that capacity until November 2016. Previously, he served as Senior Vice President of RX Commercial Operations, from 2013 until July 2016.Human Resources Global Businesses for nearly six years. Prior to joining Perrigo, Mr. Wesolowski joined PerrigoWillis gained more than 20 years of experience in February 2004 asHuman Resources leadership through roles with Fawaz Alhokair Group in the Vice President, RX SalesMiddle East, GE Capital in the UK and MarketingIreland, DoubleClick in North America and internationally, and Norkom Technologies in Europe and North America. He also was subsequently promoted toa Partner and Founding Member of the Senior Vice President of RX Sales and Marketing in 2012.Black & White Group.50
Ronald L. WinowieckiMr. Winowiecki was appointed CFO in February 2018. He served as Acting CFO from February 2017 to February 2018; Senior Vice President of Business Finance from January 2014 to February 2017; Vice President for Treasury and Accounting Shared Services from September 2011 to December 2013; and the Company’s Corporate Vice President Treasurer from October 2008 to August 2011.5153

45

Perrigo Company plc - Additional Item 5

Executive Officers



PART II.

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Prior to June 6, 2013, our common equity traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol PRGO. Since June 6, 2013, our common equity has traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol PRGO.

In association with the acquisition of Agis Industries (1983) Ltd., our common equity hashad been trading on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange ("TASE"(“TASE”) since March 16, 2005. 2005 under the same symbol. As a result of the RX business divestiture, we initiated steps to voluntarily delist our ordinary shares from trading on the TASE on November 22, 2021. The delisting of our ordinary shares took effect on February 23, 2022.

As of February 23, 2018,25, 2022, there were 1,498133,784,716 record holders of our ordinary shares.

Set forth below are the high and low sale prices for our ordinary shares on the NYSE for the periods indicated:
 Year Ended Six Months Ended
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
 High Low High Low High Low
First quarter$87.48
 $66.29
 $152.36
 $122.62
 $198.42
 $158.35
Second quarter$77.74
 $65.47
 $133.53
 $84.85
 $167.92
 $140.40
Third quarter$89.87
 $63.68
 $99.14
 $82.50
 N/A
 N/A
Fourth quarter$91.73
 $79.70
 $97.17
 $79.72
 N/A
 N/A


The graph below shows a comparison of our cumulative total return with the cumulative total returns for the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Pharmaceuticals Index. The graph assumes an investment of $100 at the beginning of the period and the reinvestment of any dividends. Information in the graph is presented for the years ended December 31, 20122015 through December 31, 2017.2021.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 5



COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
AMONG PERRIGO COMPANY PLC**,PLC, THE S&P 500 INDEX, AND THE S&P PHARMACEUTICALS INDEX
prgo-20211231_g4.jpg
*     $100 invested on December 31, 2016 - in stock or index - including reinvestment of dividends. Indexes calculated on month-end basis.

 12/31/201212/31/201312/31/201412/31/201512/31/201612/31/2017
Perrigo Company plc$100.00$147.94$161.60$140.30$81.18$85.72
S&P 500$100.00$132.39$150.51$152.59$170.84$208.14
S&P Pharmaceuticals$100.00$135.23$165.27$174.84$172.10$193.74

*$100 invested on December 31, 2012 in stock or index - including reinvestment of dividends. Indexes calculated on month-end basis.
**Perrigo Company prior to December 18, 2013. Perrigo Company plc beginning December 18, 2013.

In January 2003, the Board of Directors adopted a policy of paying quarterly dividends. The declaration and payment of dividends and the amount paid, if any, are subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors and depend on our earnings, financial condition, capital and surplus requirements and other factors the Board of Directors may consider relevant (refer to Item 8. Note 11 for additional information on dividends paid).

In October 2015, the Board of Directors approved a three-year share repurchase plan of up to $2.0 billion.billion (the "2015 Authorization"). Following the expiration of our 2015 share repurchase plan authorization in October 2018, our Board of Directors authorized up to $1.0 billion of share repurchases with no expiration date, subject to the Board of Directors’ approval of the pricing parameters and amount that may be repurchased under each specific share repurchase program (the "2018 Authorization"). We did not repurchase any shares under the share repurchase plan during the three monthsyear ended
46

Perrigo Company plc - Item 5

December 31, 2017. 2021 or December 31, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, we repurchased 2.73.4 million ordinary shares at an average repurchasepurchase price of $71.72$48.28 per share for a total of $191.5 million. We did not repurchase any shares$164.2 million under the share repurchase plan during the year ended2018 Authorization. As of December 31, 2016. During2021 the six months ended December 31, 2015, we repurchased 3.3approximate value of shares available for purchase under the 2018 Authorization was $835.8 million ordinary shares at an average repurchase price of $151.59 per share, for a total of $500.0 million..

Perrigo Company plc - Item 6


ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

ITEM 6.    [RESERVED]
The Consolidated Statements of Operations data set forth below with respect to the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the six months ended December 31, 2015 and December 27, 2014, and the year ended June 27, 2015, and the Consolidated Balance Sheet data at December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015 are derived from and are qualified by reference to the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this report and should be read in conjunction with those financial statements and notes. The Consolidated Statements of Operations data set forth below with respect to the year ended June 28, 2014 and the Consolidated Balance Sheet data at June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 are derived from audited consolidated financial statements not included in this report.
 Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
(in millions, except per share amounts)December 31, 2017 
December 31, 2016(1)
 
December 31, 2015(2)
 
December 27, 2014(3)
 
June 27, 2015(4)
 
June 28, 2014(5)
Statements of Operations Data           
Net sales$4,946.2
 $5,280.6
 $2,632.2
 $1,844.7
 $4,227.1
 $3,914.1
Cost of sales2,966.7
 3,228.8
 1,553.3
 1,170.9
 2,582.9
 2,462.0
Gross profit1,979.5
 2,051.8
 1,078.9
 673.8
 1,644.2
 1,452.1
Operating expenses1,381.3
 4,051.5
 1,011.3
 384.1
 971.7
 880.7
Operating income (loss)$598.2
 $(1,999.7) $67.6
 $289.7
 $672.5
 $571.4
            
Net income (loss)$119.6
 $(4,012.8) $42.5
 $180.6
 $136.1
 $232.8
            
Diluted earnings from continuing operations per share$0.84
 $(28.01) $0.29
 $1.34
 $0.97
 $2.01
            
Dividends declared per share$0.64
 $0.58
 $0.25
 $0.21
 $0.46
 $0.39

(1)
Includes the results of operations for assets acquired from Barr Laboratories, Inc. and assets acquired from Matawan Pharmaceuticals, LLC for the five months and eleven months and one week ended December 31, 2016, respectively.
(2)
Includes the results of operations of Naturwohl and the GSK, ScarAway®, and Entocort® asset acquisitions for the two and a half months, three months, three months, and two weeks ended December 31, 2015, respectively.
(3)
Includes the results of operations for assets acquired from Lumara Health, Inc. for the two months ended December 27, 2014.
(4)
Includes the results of operations for assets acquired from Lumara Health, Inc. and the results of operations of Omega Pharma Invest N.V. and Gelcaps Exportadora de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. for the eight, three, and two months ended June 27, 2015, respectively.
(5)
Includes the results of operations for Elan Corporation, plc and results of operations for assets acquired from Fera Pharmaceuticals, LLC (Methazolomide) and Aspen Global Inc. for the six, five and four months ended June 28, 2014, respectively.
(in millions)December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 December 27, 2014 June 27,
2015
 June 28,
2014
Balance Sheet Data           
Cash and cash equivalents$678.7
 $622.3
 $417.8
 $3,596.1
 $785.6
 $799.5
Total assets11,628.8
 13,870.1
 $19,349.6
 16,508.4
 $19,591.9
 $13,879.1
Long-term debt, less current portion3,270.8
 5,224.5
 4,971.6
 4,439.4
 5,246.9
 5,246.9

ITEM 7.
ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


The following Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") is intended to provide readers with an understanding of our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows by focusing on changes in certain key measures from year to year. This MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes found in Item 8 of this report. See also "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements."

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Executive Overview


EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW


Perrigo Company plc was incorporated under the laws of Ireland on June 28, 2013 and became the successor registrant of Perrigo Company, a Michigan corporation, on December 18, 2013 in connection with the acquisition of Elan Corporation, plc ("Elan"). Unless the context requires otherwise, the terms "Perrigo," the "Company," "we," "our," "us," and similar pronouns used herein refer to Perrigo Company plc, its subsidiaries, and all predecessors of Perrigo Company plc and its subsidiaries.


We are a leading global healthcare company, delivering valueOur vision is to our customers and consumersmake lives better by providingbringing Quality, Affordable HealthcareSelf-Care Products®. Founded in 1887 as a packager of home remedies, we have built a unique business model that is best described as the convergence of a fast-moving consumer goods company, a high-quality pharmaceutical manufacturing organization and a world-class supply chain network. We believe weconsumers trust everywhere they are one of the world's largest manufacturers of over-the-counter (“OTC”) healthcare products and suppliers of infant formulas for the store brand market.sold. We are a leading provider of branded OTC products throughout Europe,over-the-counter ("OTC") health and wellness solutions that are designed to enhance individual well-being and empower consumers to proactively prevent or treat conditions that can be self-managed.

We endeavor to empower consumers’ self-care decisions, utilizing the Company’s core competencies to fully take advantage of the massive global trend towards self-care. We define self-care as not just treating disease or helping individuals feel better after taking a product, but also maintaining and enhancing their overall health and wellness. Consistent with our vision, in 2019 Perrigo’s management and board of directors launched a leading producerthree-year strategy to transform the Company into a consumer self-care leader. We completed our transformation to a consumer self-care company in 2021 by reconfiguring the portfolio through the divestiture of generic pharmaceutical topical products such as creams, lotions,our RX business, announcement of the acquisition of HRA Pharma, and gels, as well as nasal spraysremoval of significant uncertainty through settlement of a tax exposure. In addition, we continue to invest in growth initiatives to drive future consistent and injection ("extended topical") prescription drugs. We are headquarteredsustainable results in Ireland, and sell our products primarily in North America and Europe, as well as in other markets, including Australia, Israel and China.line with consumer-packaged goods peers.


Our fiscal year previously consisted of a 52- or 53-week year ending on or around June 30 of each year with each quarter ending on the Saturday closest to each calendar quarter end. Beginning on January 1, 2016, we changed our fiscal year to beginbegins on January 1 and endends on December 31 of each year. As a result of our change in yearWe end this report on Form 10-K discloses the results of our operations for:

The twelve-month period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017;
The twelve-month period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016;
The twelve-month period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015;
The six-month period from June 28, 2015 through December 31, 2015; and
The six-month period from June 29, 2014 through December 27, 2014.

Calendar-year data for 2015 was derived from our audited results for the six-month period ended December 31, 2015 and unaudited results for the fiscal quarters ended March 28, 2015 and June 27, 2015. We cut off our quarterly accounting periods on the Saturday closest to the end of the calendar quarter, with the fourth quarter ending on December 31 of each year.


Our Segments

Our reporting and operating segments are as follows:


Consumer HealthcareSelf-Care Americas ("CHCA" ("CSCA"), comprises our consumer self-care business (OTC, infant formula, and Oral care categories, our divested Animal health category, and contract manufacturing) in the U.S., Mexico and Canada consumer healthcare business (OTC, contract, infant formula and animal health categories).
Canada.
Consumer HealthcareSelf-Care International("CHCI" ("CSCI"),comprises our branded consumer healthcareself-care business primarily branded in Europe and Australia, and our consumer focused businessesstore brand business in the U.K., Australia,United Kingdom and Israel. This segment also includes our U.K.parts of Europe and Asia. Our liquid licensed products business.
business in the United Kingdom was divested on June 19, 2020.
Prescription Pharmaceuticals("RX"),comprises our U.S. Prescription Pharmaceuticals business.


We also had two legacy operating segments, Specialty Sciences and Other, which contained our Tysabri® financial asset and Active Pharmaceuticals business ("API") businesses, respectively, which we divested (refer to Item 8. Note 2 and Note 6). Following these divestitures, there were no substantial assets or operations left in either of these segments. Effective January 1, 2017, all expenses associated with our former Specialty Sciences segment were moved to unallocated expenses. Our segments reflect the way in which our management makes operating decisions, allocates resources and manages the growth and profitability of the Company.


47

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Executive Overview

For information on each segment, our business environment, and competitive landscape, refer to Item 1. Business - Our Segments. For results by segment and geographic locations see below "Segment Results" and Item 8. Note 192 and Note 21. See Item 1. Business for information on

Strategy

Our objective is to grow our business environment and competitive landscape.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Executive Overview


Strategy

Our strategy isby responsibly bringing our self-care vision to deliver Quality Affordable Healthcare Products® life. We aim to accomplish this by leveraging our global infrastructure to expand our product offerings, thereby providing new innovative products and product line extensions to existing consumers and servicing new healthcare consumers through entry into adjacent orproduct categories, new markets. We accomplishgeographies and new channels of distribution. Critical to this strategy byis investing in and continually improving all aspects of our five strategic pillars:pillars which we call the Perrigo Advantage:


High quality;
Superior customer service;
Leading innovation;
Best cost; and
Empowered people.people,


while remaining true to our three core values, Integrity - we do what is right; Respect - we demonstrate the value we hold for one another; and Responsibility - we hold ourselves accountable for our actions. While delivering on our strategy, we remain committed to our corporate responsibility and sustainability programs, which include environmental and social initiatives, as summarized in Item 1. Business - Corporate Social Responsibility.

We utilize shared services and Research and Development ("R&D") centers of excellence in order to help ensure consistency in our processes around the world, and to maintain focus on our five strategic pillars.
    
We have grown rapidly in recent years through a combination of organic growth and targeted acquisitions. We continually reinvest in our R&D pipeline and work with partners as necessary to strive to be first-to-market with new products. Our organic growth has been and will continue to be driven by successful new product launches across all our segments and expansion in the CHCA, CHCI, and RX segments. Over time, wenew channels like e-commerce. We expect to continue to grow inorganically through expansion into adjacent products, product categories, and channels, as well as potentially through entry into new geographic markets. We evaluate potential acquisition targets using a return on invested capital ("ROIC") metric.an internally developed 12-point scale that is weighted towards accretive revenue growth which is highly correlated with increases in shareholder value.


Competitive Advantage


We believe our consumer facing business model is best-in-class in that it combines the unique competencies ofare a fast-moving consumer goods company and a pharmaceutical manufacturing company with the supply chain breadth necessary to support customers in the markets we serve. These durable business model competencies align with our five strategic pillars and we believe provide us a competitive advantage in the marketplace. We fully integrate quality in our operational systems across all products. Our ability to manage our supply chain complexity across multiple dosage forms, formulations, and stock-keeping units, as well as acquisitions, integration,integrations, and hundreds of global partners provides value to our customers. Product development capacity and life cycle management are at the core of our operational investments. Globally we have 2820manufacturing plants that are all in good regulatory compliance standing and have systems and structures in place to guide our continued success. Our leadership team is fully engaged in aligning all our metrics and objectives around sustainable compliance with industry associations and regulatory agencies.


Among other things, we believe the following give us a competitive advantage and provide value to our customers:


Leadership in first-to-market product development and product life cycle management;
Turn-key regulatory and promotional capabilities;
Management of supply chain complexity and utilizing economies of scale;
Quality and cost effectiveness throughout the supply chain creating a sustainable, low-cost network;
Deep understanding of consumer needs and customer strategies;
Industry leading e-commerce support; and
Expansive pan-European commercial infrastructure, brand-building capabilities, and a diverse product portfolio.
48

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Executive Overview




Recent Highlights


Year Ended December 31, 20172021

On March 27, 2017, we completed the sale of our Tysabri® financial asset, effective January 1, 2017, to Royalty Pharma for up to $2.85 billion, consisting of $2.2 billion in cash and up to $250.0 million and $400.0 million in milestone payments if the royalties on global net sales of Tysabri® that are received by Royalty Pharma meet specific thresholds in 2018 and 2020, respectively. As a result of this transaction, we derecognized the Tysabri® financial asset and recorded a $17.1 million gain (refer to Item 8. Note 6).

On April 6, 2017, we completed the sale of our India API business to Strides Shasun Limited for $22.2 million, inclusive of an estimated working capital adjustment. The sale did not have a material impact on our operations (refer to Item 8. Note 2).

On August 25, 2017, we completed the sale of our Russian business to Alvogen Pharma LLC. for €12.7 million ($15.1 million), inclusive of an estimated working capital adjustment. The sale did not have a material impact on our operations (refer to Item 8. Note 2).

On November 21, 2017, we completed the sale of our Israel API business to SK Capital, for a sale price of $110.0 million, which resulted in an immaterial gain recorded in our Other segment in Other expense (Income), net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations (refer to Item 8. Note 2 and Note 6).

We completed $2.6 billion of debt repayments (refer to Item 8. Note 10).

We repurchased $191.5 million worth of shares as part of our authorized share repurchase plan (refer to Item 8. Note 11).

We executed initiatives related to our cost optimization strategy that was announced on February 21, 2017. Restructuring charges totaled $61.0 million (refer to Item 8. Note 18).


Effective October 5, 2021, Jim Dillard was named Executive Vice President ("EVP") and President of our CSCA segment. Mr. Dillard's supply chain, manufacturing, R&D, innovation, and regulatory experience, along with his proven leadership skills, make him uniquely qualified to lead this segment. Before this role, Mr. Dillard served as Perrigo's EVP and Chief Scientific Officer.

On September 8, 2021, we announced a definitive agreement to acquire the outstanding equity interests of HRA Pharma for approximately €1.8 billion, or approximately $2.1 billion at the time. The proposed final transaction is expected to close in the first half of 2022, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals. See below under “HRA Pharma Acquisition Agreement” for further details.

On July 6, 2021, we completed the sale of the RX business for aggregate consideration of $1.55 billion, subject to customary adjustments for cash, debt, working capital and certain transaction expenses. See below under “RX Business Divestiture" for further details.

On March 1, 2021, CEO & President Murray S. Kessler signed a three-year contract extension until October 8, 2024 to guide Perrigo in successfully executing our transformation to a consumer-focused, self-care company.

Year Ended December 31, 20162020


ConsistentDuring the year ended December 31, 2020, we completed strategic acquisitions and a divestiture that advanced our self-care transformation. We acquired the oral care assets of High Ridge Brands ("Dr. Fresh"), three Eastern European OTC dermatological brands from Sanofi, entered a strategic investment in and long-term supply agreement with previously announced actions,Kazmira LLC, and divested our U.K.- based Rosemont Pharmaceuticals business. For additional details on these and other asset acquisitions and the divestiture refer to the "Recent Trends and Developments" discussion in the CSCA and CSCI sections below.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we added a numberrepurchased $164.2 million worth of positions and processes to our Dublin headquarters across a rangeshares at an average purchase price of corporate functions, including supply chain/global operations, procurement, enterprise risk management, and corporate finance, leveraging the strength$48.28 as part of our global platform.authorized share repurchase plan.

We repaid $500.0 million outstanding under our 1.300% Senior Notes due 2016 ("1.300% 2016 Notes") on September 29, 2016 (refer to Item 8. Note 10).

On August 5, 2016, we completed the sale of our U.S. Vitamins, Minerals, and Supplements ("VMS") business to International Vitamins Corporation (refer to Item 8. Note 2).


Six Months EndedEffective December 31, 201515, 2020, our board of directors appointed Orlando D. Ashford to serve as a director of the Company and a member of its Remuneration Committee.


On October 27, 2020, we announced that we will be establishing a new North American headquarters in Grand Rapids, Michigan. We signed an agreement to lease space located in Michigan State University's Grand Rapids Innovation Park and expect the building to be ready for occupancy in mid-2022. This new location will help us support cross-functional collaboration and position us to routinely interact with a statewide education and research network within the Grand Rapids Medical Mile. This expansion is consistent with our self-care transformation and will advance our self-care vision.

Effective July 29, 2020, our board of directors appointed Katherine C. Doyle to serve as a director of the Company and a member of its Audit Committee.

On June 19, 2020, we, through our subsidiary, issued $750.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.150% Senior Notes due 2030 (the "2020 Notes") and received net proceeds of $737.1 million after fees and market discount. On July 6, 2020, we used a portion of the proceeds to fund the redemption of $280.4 million of our 3.500% Senior Notes due March 15, 2021 and $309.6 million of our 3.500% Senior Notes due December 15, 2021.


On November 13, 2015, our shareholders rejected an unsolicited tender offer from Mylan N.V. ("Mylan"). During the six months ended December 31, 2015, the total cost to effectively defend against Mylan was $86.9 million, which was recorded in Administration expense.
49

We expanded our product offerings through targeted acquisitions including (refer to Item 8. Note 2):

The announced acquisition of a portfolio of generic dosage forms and strengths of Retin-A® (tretinoin), a topical prescription acne treatment, from Matawan Pharmaceuticals, LLC, which closed in January 2016 and expanded our "prescription only" ("Rx") portfolio.

The acquisition of Crohn's disease treatment Entocort® (budesonide) capsules and its authorized generic (for sale within the U.S.), from AstraZeneca plc, which expanded our Rx portfolio.


Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Executive OverviewConsolidated



The acquisition of Naturwohl Pharma GmbH ("Naturwohl"), a nutritional business known for its leading German dietary supplement brand, Yokebe®, and the acquisition of a portfolio of well-established OTC brands, such as Niquitin® and Coldrex®,from GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare (“GSK”). Both of these acquisitions built upon the global platform we established through the Omega Pharma Invest N.V. ("Omega") acquisition, leveraging our European market share and expanding our product offerings.

The ScarAway® brand portfolio acquisition, which served as our entry into the branded OTC business in the U.S.

We repurchased $500.0 million worth of shares as part of our authorized share repurchase plan (refer to Item 8. Note 11).

We executed initiatives designed to increase operational efficiency and improve our return on invested capital by globalizing our supply chain through global shared service arrangements, streamlining our organizational structure, and disposing of certain assets. During the six months ended December 31, 2015, restructuring charges totaled $26.9 million (refer to Item 8. Note 18).

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


CONSOLIDATED


Consolidated Financial Results
Year Ended
(in millions, except percentages)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Net sales$4,138.7 $4,088.2 $3,869.9 
Gross profit$1,416.2 $1,494.9 $1,433.7 
Gross profit %34.2 %36.6 %37.0 %
Operating income$410.4 $265.2 $174.7 
Operating income %9.9 %6.5 %4.5 %
 Six Months Ended Year Ended
($ in millions)December 27,
2014
 December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2017
Net sales$1,844.7
 $2,632.2
 $5,014.7
 $5,280.6
 $4,946.2
Gross profit$673.8
 $1,078.9
 $2,049.4
 $2,051.8
 $1,979.5
Gross profit %36.5% 41.0% 40.9% 38.9 % 40.0%
Operating expenses$384.1
 $1,011.3
 $1,599.0
 $4,051.5
 $1,381.3
Operating expenses %20.8% 38.4% 31.9% 76.7 % 27.9%
Operating income (loss)$289.7
 $67.6
 $450.4
 $(1,999.7) $598.2
Operating income (loss) %15.7% 2.6% 9.0% (37.9)% 12.1%
Change in financial assets$(46.9) $(57.3) $(88.8) $2,608.2
 $24.9
Interest and other, net$117.0
 $115.1
 $478.2
 $239.3
 $158.0
Loss on extinguishment of debt$9.6
 $0.9
 $1.8
 $1.1
 $135.2
Income tax expense (benefit)$29.4
 $(33.6) $61.1
 $(835.5) $160.5
Net income (loss)$180.6
 $42.5
 $(1.9) $(4,012.8) $119.6
prgo-20211231_g5.jpgprgo-20211231_g6.jpg
*Total net sales by geography is derived from the location of the entity that sells to a third party.

Year Ended December 31, 2021 vs. December 31, 2020

Net sales increased $50.5 million, or 1%, due to:
$78.4 million increase due primarily to:
$60.9 million increase from favorable foreign currency translation; and
$46.2 million increase from our acquisitions of the three Eastern European Brands in October 2020 and Dr. Fresh in April 2020; partially offset by
$28.7 million decrease due to our now-divested Rosemont pharmaceuticals business previously included in our CSCI segment.
$27.9 million, or 0.7%, net decrease in the base business due primarily to a decline of $68.3 million in sales of cough and cold products due to the low incidence of related illness during the first half of the year. Additional decreases were due primarily to a decrease in demand of certain products due primarily to COVID-19 restrictions, inventory reductions at our retail customers in the U.S. compared to the prior year, and $38.4 million of discontinued products. These decreases were partially offset by the incremental impact of $130.0 million in sales of new products, recognition of contract manufacturing sales to the now-divested RX business, and positive pricing.

Operating income increased $145.2 million, or 55%, due to:

$78.7 million decrease in gross profit due primarily to unfavorable plant overhead absorption due to lower production volumes resulting from the weak cough cold season in the first half of the year, and by higher input and freight costs. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased 240 basis points due to these same factors, as well as unfavorable product mix.
50

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Consolidated




*
Total net sales by geography is derived from the location of the entity that sells to a third party. For geographic information for the year ended December 31, 2016, six months ended December 31, 2015, and the year ended June 27, 2015, refer to Item 8. Note 19.

$223.9 million decrease in operating expenses due primarily to:
Details$226.5 million decrease in other operating expenses due primarily to:
$417.6 million award received for the claim arising from the Omega Acquisition, as described in Item 8. Note 19; partially offset by
$173.1 million of impairment charges primarily on goodwill and analysisheld for sale assets related to the Latin American businesses and goodwill related to our Oral Care International business;
$13.7 million increase in restructuring expenses primarily associated with actions taken to streamline the organization; and
$4.0 million increase for the absence of an insurance reimbursement received in the prior year period.

$2.6 million increase in selling, distribution, R&D, and administration expenses due primarily to:
$7.8 million increase in distribution expenses due primarily to increased warehouse costs; and
$3.5 million increase in administration expenses due primarily to a reduction in an insurance recovery receivable related to litigation contingencies, and an increase in legal and professional fees, partially offset by our Project Momentum cost savings initiative and transitional service agreement ("TSA") income from the acquirer of our former RX business; partially offset by
$9.1 million decrease in selling, advertising and promotion expenses due primarily to decreased spend in our OTC business within CSCA and negative consumption trends in the cough and cold and parasite products within CSCI.

Year Ended December 31, 2020 vs. December 31, 2019

Net sales increased $218.3 million, or 6%, due to:
$299.4 million, or 8%, net increase due primarily to an increase in the CSCA segment of $252.1 million and CSCI segment of $47.4 million.
CSCA growth of $252.1 million included $168.2 million from the acquisitions of Ranir and Dr. Fresh for sales in periods of 2020 with no comparable sales in 2019, and net sales growth of $83.9 million driven primarily by certain OTC product categories. OTC growth was due primarily to favorable consumer conversion to products in our Digestive health category, the increase of consumer COVID-19 related demand experienced in the first half of 2020 in the Pain and sleep aids category, and the incremental impact of new product sales, all of which benefited from strong e-commerce performance. These were partially offset by a $38.6 million reduction in sales from the weak start to the cough cold season in late 2020, and normal pricing pressure.
In our CSCI segment, net sales increased $47.4 million due primarily to the Ranir, Dr. Fresh and Eastern European dermatology brands acquisitions contributing $45.3 million in sales for periods of 2020 with no comparable sales in 2019, net positive pricing, the incremental impact of new product sales, and an increase in demand for certain products in our Pain and sleep-aids and Vitamins, minerals and supplements ("VMS") categories due to pandemic-related factors. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in sales of certain products in our Skincare and personal hygiene and Healthy lifestyle categories due to pandemic-related factors, a decrease in sales of $24.1 million from the weak start to the cough cold season in late 2020, and discontinued products of $10.0 million.
$81.2 million decrease due primarily to:
$84.0 million decrease due to our divested animal health business previously included in our CSCA segment, and our divested Rosemont pharmaceuticals business and Canoderm prescription product, both previously included in our CSCI segment; and
$6.4 million decrease due to $10.5 million unfavorable foreign currency translation in the Mexican Peso, net of a $4.1 million increase from favorable foreign currency translation primarily related to the Euro; partially offset by
51

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Consolidated

$9.2 million increase due to the absence of the Ranitidine retail market withdrawal included in the prior year.

Operating income increased $90.5 million, or 52%, due to:

$61.2 million increase in gross profit due primarily to increased net sales as described above, which was partially offset by infant nutrition operational inefficiencies, increased labor and overhead costs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, and an increase in commodity costs for a certain OTC brand. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased 40 basis points due primarily to these same factors, unfavorable product mix mainly due to the Oral care acquisitions, and normal pricing pressures, partially offset by the absence of the Ranitidine retail market withdrawal included in 2020.

$29.3 million decrease in operating expenses due primarily to:
$22.8 million decrease in restructuring expenses related primarily to the prior year reorganization of our sales force in France and reorganization of our executive management team;
The absence of $13.8 million of impairment charges primarily for goodwill and certain definite-lived intangible assets in our CSCI segments taken in the prior year;
The absence of a $7.1 million asset abandonment charge related to our waste water treatment plant in Vermont taken in the prior year; partially offset by
$7.0 million increase in selling and administration expenses due primarily to the inclusion of expenses from our acquisitions of Ranir and Dr. Fresh, an increase in insurance expense, an increase in employee incentive compensation expense, and incremental COVID-19 related operating costs, including employee bonuses and costs related to measures implemented to keep employees safe, partially offset by the absence of expenses from the divested animal health and Rosemont pharmaceutical businesses, the absence of acquisition and integration-related charges related to the acquisition of Ranir, and savings from our current Project Momentum cost savings initiative.

Recent Trends and Developments

Operating Trends

The self-care markets in which we compete have been highly dynamic over the past couple of years. These markets were negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic related factors including, a dramatic reduction in cough, cold, and flu illnesses in the first half of the year, higher input costs, and more recently supply chain disruptions. Starting in the second quarter of 2021, we saw a sharp rebound in U.S. and European consumer takeaway in almost all categories we operate as these countries began to remove restrictions and reopen and the incidences of cough, cold and flu related illnesses began to increase. Despite increased consumer purchases, net sales for the second quarter of 2021 significantly lagged this rebound in consumer takeaway, which we primarily attribute to year-over-year reductions in customer inventories. Consumer take-away remained strong in the third quarter and we saw a surge in orders from customers. However, due to supply chain disruptions, including the significant shortage of truck drivers in the U.S. and record delays at global shipping ports, our third quarter net sales were negatively impacted because of the inability to ship product. These supply chain disruptions led to a large increase in unfulfilled customer orders. In the fourth quarter we took a series of actions to improve the situation, including reconfiguring our distribution system for short term shipments, outsourcing highly complex product lines to a third party logistic provider, adding regional carriers for challenged shipping lanes, hiring additional distribution center personnel, and increasing the purchase cycle as it relates to the manufacturing process. Our actions improved our ability to ship and meet increasing market demands, albeit at a higher cost.

Higher input costs were somewhat offset by price increases initiated in the second quarter of 2021. We continue to take steps in order to mitigate the challenges of the current global operating environment, including further pricing actions and reducing discretionary costs. While we believe these trends will continue in the near-term, we are expecting an improvement throughout 2022. However, this will depend on the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic and worldwide supply chain challenges, as discussed below, and it is possible some of these factors may increase or decrease more than others, and could also negatively affect consumer purchases in the jurisdictions in which we operate.

52

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Consolidated

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic

We, along with many other global consumer companies, have been and continue to be impacted by the COVID-19 global pandemic and the responses by government entities to combat the virus. We continue to operate in all our jurisdictions and comply with the rules and guidelines set in each jurisdiction. We continue to closely monitor the impact of COVID-19 on all aspects of our business in all our global locations and have continued our COVID-19 safety protocols for employees. To date, these arrangements have not materially affected our ability to maintain our business operations, including the operation of financial reporting systems, internal control over financial reporting, and disclosure controls and procedures. However, the pandemic and actions to slow its spread have impacted our day-to-day operations, including through increased absenteeism and increased costs of raw materials and finished goods, although most of our facilities have continued to produce at high levels despite these challenges. Moreover, our global operations have been negatively impacted by the worldwide supply chain challenges, which have increased costs and delays.

As many jurisdictions have relaxed COVID-19 related restrictions, a number of those jurisdictions have experienced increases in COVID-19 cases, including more contagious variants of the virus and in some cases have begun implementing new or renewed restrictions. In addition, as conditions worldwide continue to evolve, uncertainty remains about the timing of widespread availability and acceptance of vaccines and the efficacy of current vaccines against evolving strains or variants of the virus. As such, if the pandemic continues or intensifies, it is possible that these or other challenges may begin having a larger impact on our operations. Additionally, future volatility in financial and other capital markets may continue to adversely impact our stock price and our ability to access capital markets. The situation surrounding COVID-19 remains fluid, and we continue to actively manage our response and assess potential impacts to our financial condition, supply chains and other operations, employees, results of operations, consumer demand for our products, and our ability to access capital. The magnitude of any such adverse impact cannot currently be determined due to a number of uncertainties surrounding COVID-19.

As mentioned above, during the first half of 2021, our segments experienced a sharp decline in net sales for cough and cold products in our Upper respiratory and Pain and sleep aid categories, due to the very low incidence of cough, cold and flu related illness during that time. We believe the low incidence of cough, cold and flu related illness was due to social distancing measures and mask mandates put in place by many of the jurisdictions where we compete to combat the spread of COVID-19. As many of these markets relaxed restrictions and reopened, consumer behavior began to return to normal, and the incidences of cough, cold and flu related illnesses increased. The spread of certain COVID-19 variants may have contributed to these higher incidences as their symptoms can be similar. This resulted in rebounding consumer takeaway in the second quarter, including for cough, cold and flu products, although factory shipments lagged consumption. During the third quarter of 2021, consumer takeaway strengthened in both the U.S. and Europe for cough, cold and flu products. However, we also experienced supply chain disruptions, including a significant shortage of truck drivers in the U.S. and record delays at global shipping ports, which led to higher unfulfilled customer orders compared to the prior year. In the fourth quarter of 2021, we took a series of actions to improve the situation, including reconfiguring our distribution system for short term shipments, outsourcing highly complex product lines to a third party logistic provider, adding regional carriers for challenged shipping lanes, hiring additional distribution center personnel, and increasing the purchase cycle as it relates to the manufacturing process. Moreover, we continue to incur additional operating costs related to COVID-19, due primarily to increased material costs and increased costs driven by pandemic-related global supply chain disruptions as well as costs related to our ongoing employee safety protocols.

While the current trend of increased consumer takeaway suggests that the volatility in consumer behavior during the pandemic is improving, the emergence and spread of new disease variants or additional outbreaks in these or other jurisdictions could result in new restrictions or cause these trends to change, slow or reverse. Moving forward, it remains uncertain if the consumer and customer behavior surrounding COVID-19 that has impacted net sales will continue to normalize or change and if the increase in operating costs and supply chain disruptions will continue or change. Any change in these trends will likely depend on the duration and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the emergence of new strains of the virus that are more contagious or harmful, each individual country's evolving response to the pandemic, as well as the availability and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics. Given our financial strength, we expect to continue to maintain sufficient liquidity as we continue to operate through the pandemic.

53

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Consolidated

RX Business Divestiture

On March 1, 2021, we announced a definitive agreement to sell our RX business to Altaris. On July 6, 2021, we completed the sale of the RX business for aggregate consideration of $1.55 billion, subject to customary adjustments for cash, debt, working capital and certain transaction expenses. The consideration included approximately $53.3 million of reimbursements, which Altaris will be required to deliver in cash to Perrigo pursuant to the terms of the Agreement. The sale resulted in a pre-tax gain, net of professional fees, of $47.5 million recorded in Other (income) expense, net on the Statement of Operations for discontinued operations. The gain included a $159.3 million increase from the write-off of foreign currency translation adjustment from Accumulated other comprehensive income.

The sale of the RX business helped establish Perrigo as a pure-play consumer self-care company, and was an essential milestone in our transformation plan. The financial results of the RX business, which were previously reported as part of our RX segment, have been classified as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, as there were no substantial assets or operations left in this segment. Unless otherwise noted, amounts and disclosures throughout this Management’s Discussion and Analysis relate to our continuing operations. Refer to Item 8. Note 8 for additional information regarding discontinued operations.

HRA Pharma Acquisition Agreement

On September 8, 2021, we and the Purchaser entered into a Put Option Agreement to acquire certain holding companies holding all of the outstanding equity interests of HRA Pharma from funds affiliated with the Sellers. Pursuant to the Put Option Agreement, following completion of the works council consultation process required under French law, the selling shareholders exercised their put option right under the Put Option Agreement and, on October 20, 2021, the Company, the Purchaser and the Sellers entered into the Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement, the Purchaser has agreed to acquire certain holding companies holding all of the outstanding equity interests of HRA Pharma from the Sellers for cash. The transaction values HRA Pharma at approximately €1.8 billion, or approximately $2.1 billion based on exchange rates as of the date of the Put Option Agreement, on an enterprise value basis and using a lockbox mechanism set forth in the Purchase Agreement. In September 2021, we entered into two non-designated currency option contracts to hedge the foreign currency exposure of the euro-denominated purchase price for HRA Pharma (refer to Item 8. Note 11).

The proposed final transaction is expected to close in the first half of 2022, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals. We intend to pay the purchase price using a combination of cash on hand and, depending upon market conditions, either funds available under our current credit facility or funds from new debt financing. HRA Pharma is one of the fastest growing OTC companies globally, with three category-leading self-care brands in blister care (Compeed®), women’s health (ellaOne®) and scar care (Mederma®), and brings expertise in prescription-to-OTC switches. This acquisition is expected to strengthen our presence in Europe, improve our financial profile and margins, and build on our transformation to a consumer self-care company. Operating results are expected to be reported within both our CSCA and CSCI segments.

Irish Revenue Notice of Amended Assessment

On October 30, 2018, we received an audit findings letter from the Irish Office of the Revenue Commissioners (“Irish Revenue”) for the tax years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013. The audit findings letter related to the tax treatment of the 2013 sale of the Tysabri® intellectual property and related assets to Biogen Idec by Elan Pharma. The consideration paid by Biogen Idec to Elan Pharma took the form of an upfront payment and future contingent royalty payments. Elan Pharma recognized such receipts as trading income in its tax returns filed with Irish Revenue, consistent with Elan Pharma's historical practice relating to its active management of intellectual property rights.

In its audit findings letter, Irish Revenue proposed to charge Elan Pharma tax on the net chargeable gain realized by Elan Pharma on the Tysabri® transaction in 2013 at a rate of 33%, rather than the 12.5% tax rate applied to trading income. On November 29, 2018,Irish Revenue issued a Notice of Amended Assessment (“NoA”) for the tax year ended December 31, 2013, in the amount of €1,643 million, and claiming tax payable in the amount of €1,636 million, not including any interest or applicable penalties.

Accordingly, we filed an appeal of the NoA on December 27, 2018 with the Irish Tax Appeals Commission ("TAC"), which is the statutory body charged with considering whether the NoA was properly founded as a matter of Irish tax law. Separately, we were also granted leave by the Irish High Court on February 25, 2019 to seek judicial review of the issuance of the NoA by Irish Revenue.

54

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Consolidated

On November 4, 2020, the High Court ruled that the Irish Revenue's decision to issue the NoA did not violate Elan Pharma's constitutional rights and legitimate expectations as a taxpayer. The Irish High Court did not rule on the merits of the NoA under Irish tax law.

We strongly believe that Elan Pharma’s tax position was correct and ultimately would have been confirmed through judicial process. However, in light of the risks and delays inherent in any litigation, on April 26, 2021, Perrigo, through its tax adviser, made a without prejudice written offer of settlement to Irish Revenue detailing a possible framework to resolve the dispute, which applied an alternative basis of taxation than the respective positions taken by Irish Revenue in the NoA and by Elan Pharma in its tax returns. On May 31, 2021, Irish Revenue issued a formal response to Perrigo's tax adviser indicating that the written settlement offer would not be accepted as presented. However, Irish Revenue did indicate that they would remain available for further discussion without prejudice and the Company's representatives continued to meet and correspond with Irish Revenue throughout the summer.

On July 9, 2021, Irish Revenue issued a letter acknowledging that not all relevant facts were known to them when they issued the NoA in 2018 and, accordingly, they would not object if the Appeal Commissioner were to make certain adjustments reducing Irish Revenue’s original assessment. Such adjustments would reflect contingent royalty payments that were never received by Elan Pharma, deductions for acquisition and development costs incurred, and allowable losses and reliefs, and would, if allowed, result in an aggregate reduction of more than €660.0 million from the income taxes claimed in the NoA as issued.

On September 29, 2021, Elan Pharma reached an agreement with Irish Revenue providing for full and final settlement of the NoA. Elan Pharma and Irish Revenue agreed to a full and final settlement of the NoA on the following terms: (i) on a 'without prejudice basis' and, for purposes of the settlement, the alternative basis of taxation was applied, (ii) Irish Revenue to take no further action in relation to the NoA or any Tysabri related income or transactions, (iii) no interest or penalties applied, (iv) a total tax of €297.0 million charged as full and final settlement of all liabilities arising from the sale of the Tysabri patents for the fiscal years 2013 to 2021, and (v) after Irish Revenue credited taxes already paid and certain unused R&D credits against the €297.0 million charged settlement amount, the total cash payment of €266.1 million ($307.5 million) was made on October 5, 2021. We recorded the payment as a component of income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations (refer to Item 8. Note 17).

Internal Revenue Service Audits of Perrigo Company, a U.S. Subsidiary

As described in more detail in Item 8. Note 17, Perrigo Company, our U.S. subsidiary ("Perrigo U.S."), is engaged in a series of tax disputes in the U.S. relating primarily to transfer pricing adjustments including income in connection with the purchase, distribution, and sale of store-brand OTC pharmaceutical products in the United States, including the heartburn medication omeprazole. The trial of the refund case relating to the dispute of the amount of taxable income on Omeprazole sales was held during the period May 25, 2021 to June 7, 2021 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan. Post-trial briefings were completed on September 24, 2021 and the case is now fully submitted for the court's decision.

On May 7, 2020, we received final Notices of Proposed Adjustment ("NOPA") from the IRS regarding the deductibility of interest related to the IRS audit of Perrigo U.S. for the years ended June 28, 2014 and June 27, 2015. The NOPA capped the interest rate on the debts for U.S. federal tax purposes at 130.0% of the Applicable Federal Rate (a blended rate reduction of 4.0% per annum) on the stated ground that the loans were not negotiated on an arms’-length basis. On May 3, 2021, the IRS notified us that it will no longer pursue the 130.0% of AFR position as indicated in the NOPA due to a change in IRS policy. On January 20, 2022, the IRS responded to our Protest, which we filed on February 26, 2021, with its Rebuttal, and revised its position on this interest rate issue by reasserting that implicit parental support considerations are necessary to determine the arm's length interest rate and proposed revised interest rates that are higher than the interest rates proposed under its 130.0% of AFR assertion. The blended interest rate proposed by the IRS Rebuttal is 4.36%, an increase from the blended interest rate in the RAR of 2.57%, and lower than the stated blended interest rate of the loans of 6.8%. We will pursue all available administrative and judicial remedies necessary to defend the deductibility of the interest expense on this indebtedness.

In addition, the 30-day letter for the 2013-2015 tax years expanded on a NOPA issued on December 11, 2019 and proposed to disallow adjustments to gross sales income on the sale of prescription products to wholesalers for accrued wholesale customer pipeline chargebacks where the prescription products were not re-sold by such wholesalers to covered retailers by the end of the tax year for the 2013-2015 tax years. The IRS' NOPA asserts that the reduction of gross sales income of such chargebacks is an impermissible method of accounting. The IRS proposed a change in accounting method that would defer the reduction in gross sales income until the year the prescription products were re-sold to covered retailers. The NOPA proposes an increase in sales revenue of approximately $99.5 million for the 2013-2015 tax years. We filed a protest on February 26, 2021 to request IRS
55

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Consolidated

Appeals consideration. On January 20, 2022, the IRS responded to our Protest with its Rebuttal and reiterated its position in the NOPA that the accrued chargebacks are not currently deductible in the tax year accrued because all events have not occurred to establish the fact of the liability in the year deducted. If the IRS were to prevail in its proposed adjustment, we estimate a payment of approximately $18.0 million, excluding interest and penalties for the 2013-2015 tax years. In addition, we expect the IRS to seek similar adjustments for future years. If those future adjustments were to be sustained, based on preliminary calculations and subject to further analysis, we estimate this would result in a payment not to exceed $7.0 million through tax year ended December 31, 2021, excluding interest and penalties. We have fully reserved for this issue. We strongly disagree with the IRS’s proposed adjustment and will pursue all available administrative and judicial remedies necessary.

On December 2, 2021, the IRS commenced an audit of our federal income tax returns for the tax years ended December 31, 2015, through December 31, 2019.

Internal Revenue Service Audit of Athena Neurosciences, LLC, a U.S. Subsidiary
On April 26, 2019, we received a revised NOPA from the IRS regarding transfer pricing positions related to the IRS audit of Athena for the years ended December 31, 2017,2011, December 31, 2016,2012 and December 31, 2015,2013. The
dispute involves the six monthsroyalties payable to Athena for its early-stage intellectual property in several in-process products, including the Multiple Sclerosis drug Tysabri. To avoid double taxation of Tysabri income in the U.S. and Ireland, Athena made requests for Competent Authority Assistance with the IRS and Irish Revenue on April 21 and 23, 2020, which were accepted. Supplemental requests for Competent Authority assistance to resolve a dispute with the IRS over the deductibility of a litigation expense payment for the drug Zonegran were also accepted. An opening conference with the IRS was held on May 6, 2021 with a follow-up conference held on December 3, 2021. An opening conference with Irish Revenue was held on July 23, 2021 (refer to Item 8. Note 17). The respective Competent Authorities will attempt to reach a resolution that avoids double taxation on both issues.

Israeli Notice of Assessment

On December 29, 2020, we received a Stage A assessment from the Israeli Tax Authority for the tax years ended December 31, 2015 through December 31, 2017 in the amount of $63.8 million relating to attribution of intangible income to Israel, income qualifying for a lower preferential rate of tax, exemption from capital gains tax, and December 27, 2014, anddeduction of certain settlement payments. We timely filed our protest on March 11, 2021 to move the yearsmatter to Stage B of the assessment process. Through negotiations with the ITA, we resolved the audit for the tax year ended June 27, 2015 through tax year ended December 31, 2019, by agreeing to add tax year ended December 31, 2018 and June 28, 2014 are described below by reporting segment and line item. Refertax year ended December 31, 2019 to the "Unallocated Expenses," "Interest, Other and Change in financial assets (Consolidated)," and "Income Taxes (Consolidated)" sections belowaudit to reach an agreeable resolution to provide certainty for discussions relatedthese additional periods. The agreement with the ITA required us to our expenses.

Restructuring

On February 21, 2017,pay $19.0 million, after offset of refunds of $17.2 million, for the five taxable years. In addition, we approvedpaid $12.5 million to resolve a workforce reduction plan as part of a larger cost optimization strategy acrosstax liability indemnity for the Company, which was completed during the year. Our plan was to reduce our global workforce by approximately 750 employees, which included some actions already taken and 235 employees who had elected to participate in a voluntary early retirement program. This represented a reduction of approximately 14% of our global non-production workforce. The changes to our workforce varied by country, based on legal requirements and required consultations with works councils and other employee representatives, as appropriate. During thetax year ended December 31, 2017 relating to Perrigo API Ltd, which we recognized $61.0 milliondisposed of restructuring expenses (referin December 2017.

Refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors - Tax Related Risks and Item 8. Note 1817) for additional information on tax related matters.

Tribunal Ruling in Claim Arising from the Omega Acquisition

As previously disclosed, we were involved in arbitration in Belgium related to our claims of fraud in connection with the Omega Acquisition. The Tribunal panel, as described in more detail under Claim Arising from the Omega Acquisition in Item 8. Note 19, found fraud by the sellers of Omega in a ruling on August 27, 2021 and awarded Perrigo approximately €355.0 million ($417.6 million at the time of cash receipt) including fees and costs. The panel also ruled against the sellers and in favor of Perrigo on all the counterclaims. The sellers have paid all amounts owed under the award, and the arbitral proceedings have now ended. The arbitration proceedings remain confidential as required by the SPA and the rules of CEPANI. We recorded the cash receipt as a reduction to Operating Expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Securities Litigation Settlement

A settlement was reached in the case, In re Perrigo Company plc Securities Litigation as described in more detail in Item 8. Note 19 under the header In the United States (cases related to Irish Tax events). In addition, duringMotion papers seeking approval of the year ended December 31, 2017, we executedclass action settlement were filed on October 4, 2021. The Court issued a supply chain reorganizationpreliminary approval order on October 29, 2021, which continuesled to generate savings for both our North Americannotices being sent to class members. The Court held a hearing on February 16, 2022 regarding the settlement and International segments.issued the Final Approval Order and Judgment. As a result, the settlement has been approved and the case has now ended. The settlement has been funded by insurance.

56

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Consolidated


Impairments


ThroughoutDuring the years ended December 31, 20172021 and December 31, 2016,2019, we identified impairment indicators for various assets across our different segments, and therefore, we performed impairment testing. Below is a summary of the impairment charges recorded by segment (in millions):

  Year Ended
  December 31, 2017
  Definite-Lived Intangible Assets Assets
Held-For-Sale
 IPR&D Fixed Assets Total
CHCA(1)
 $
 $
 $
 $4.5
 $4.5
CHCI(2)
 
 3.7
 1.1
 
 4.8
RX(3)
 19.7
 
 11.6
 3.6
 34.9
Other(4)
 
 3.3
 
 
 3.3
  $19.7
 $7.0
 $12.7
 $8.1
 $47.5
Year Ended
December 31, 2021
CSCA(1)
CSCI(2)
Total
Goodwill$6.1 $10.0 $16.1 
Assets held-for-sale156.1 — 156.1 
IPR&D— 0.9 0.9 
$162.2 $10.9 $173.1 


(1) Relates to an impairment associated with our Latin American divestiture.
(2) Relates to our goodwill within our Oral Care International reporting unit and certain idle property, plant and equipment.IPR&D.
(2)
Year Ended
December 31, 2019
CSCA
CSCI(1)
Total
Definite-lived intangible assets$— $9.7 $9.7 
IPR&D4.1 — 4.1 
$4.1 $9.7 $13.8 

(1) Relates primarily to our Russian business assets held-for-sale, which were sold August 25, 2017 (refer to Item 8. Note 2).an intangible asset for certain pain relief products that we license from a third party.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Consolidated


(3) Relates primarily to intangible assets acquired through the Lumara Health, Inc. acquisition and In-Process Research and Development ("IPR&D") assets acquired in conjunction with certain Development-Stage Rx Products(refer to Item 8. Note 3).
(4) Relates to our Israel API assets held-for-sale, which were sold November 21, 2017 (refer to Item 8. Note 2).
  Year Ended
  December 31, 2016
  Goodwill Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets Definite-Lived Intangible Assets Assets
Held-For-Sale
 IPR&D Fixed Assets Total
CHCA(1)
 $24.5
 $0.4
 $
 $9.9
 $
 $3.5
 $38.3
CHCI(2)
 868.4
 849.1
 321.4
 
 3.5
 
 2,042.4
RX(3)
 
 
 342.2
 
 
 0.2
 342.4
Specialty Sciences(4)
 199.6
 
 
 
 
 
 199.6
Other(5)
 
 
 2.0
 6.3
 
 
 8.3
  $1,092.5
 $849.5
 $665.6
 $16.2
 $3.5
 $3.7
 $2,631.0

(1) Relates primarily to goodwill acquired through the acquisition of Sergeant’s Pet Care Products, Inc. and Velcera Inc. (refer to Item 8. Note 3),
as well as U.S. VMS assets held for sale, which were subsequently sold on August 5, 2016 (refer to Item 8. Note 2).
(2) Relates to certain intangible assets and goodwill acquired in conjunction with the Omega acquisition as well as trademarks originally acquired through the acquisition of Aspen Global Inc. (refer to Item 8. Note 3).
(3) Relates primarily to our intangible assets acquired in conjunction with the Entocort® acquisition (refer to Item 8. Note 3).
(4) Relates to goodwill from our Elan acquisition (refer to Item 8. Note 3).
(5)Relates primarily to our India API assets held-for-sale, which were sold April 6, 2017 (refer to Item 8. Note 2 and 9).

CONSUMER HEALTHCARESELF-CARE AMERICAS


Recent Trends and Developments


We continue to experience a reduction in pricing expectations within our CHCA segment, primarily in the cough/cold, animal health, and analgesics categories due to various factors, including focus from customers to capture supply chain productivity savings and competition in specific product categories. We expect this pricing environment to continue to impact our CHCA segment for the foreseeable future.

We completed the sale of the animal health pet treats plant fixed assets on February 1, 2017 and received $7.7 million in proceeds (refer to Item 8. Note 2).

Segment Results

Year Ended December 31, 2017 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2016



 Year Ended
($ in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2017
Net sales$2,507.1
 $2,429.9
Gross profit$825.2
 $817.8
Gross profit %32.9% 33.7%
Operating income$399.8
 $445.0
Operating income %15.9% 18.3%
Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
CHCA


Net sales decreased $77.2 million, or 3%, over the prior year due to:

The absence of $110.2 million in sales attributable to the U.S. VMS business (refer to Item 8. Note 2);
A net decrease in sales of existing products of $21.5 million due to pricing pressures and lower volumes in certain categories; and
Discontinued products of $14.0 million; partially offset by
New product sales of $68.7 million related primarily to the launches of fluticasone nasal spray (store brand equivalent to Flonase®), smoking cessation products and esomeprazole magnesium (store brand equivalent to Nexium® 24HR capsules).

Operating income increased $45.2 million, or 11%, as a result of:

A decrease of $7.4 million in gross profit due to:
Favorable product mix in certain categories; and
Positive contributions from supply chain efficiencies; more than offset by
The absence of $17.6 million in gross profit as a result of the sale of the U.S. VMS business (refer to Item 8. Note 2); and
Pricing pressures in certain categories as discussed above.

A decrease of $52.6 million in operating expenses due to:
The absence of a $36.7 million intangible asset and goodwill impairment charges related to the sale of the U.S. VMS business, held-for-sale assets associated with our animal health pet treats plant and our animal health business (refer to Item 8. Note 2, Note 3, and Note 9);
Decreased selling and administrative expenses of $31.0 million due primarily to timing of promotions related to our animal health category and savings related to our cost reduction initiatives taken in the prior year;
Decreased R&D expenses of $8.2 million due to timing of clinical trials, reduced spending on infant formula clinical trials and lower costs related to our cost reduction initiatives; and
A $4.1 million gain related to contingent consideration (refer to Item 8. Note 6); offset partially by
Increased restructuring expenses of $21.8 million related primarily to strategic organizational enhancements (refer to Item 8. Note 18); and
A $4.5 million impairment charge recorded on idle property, plant and equipment.

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 0.8% higher due primarily to favorable product mix and supply chain efficiencies as discussed above.

Operating income as a percentage of net sales was 2.4% higher due primarily to favorable product mix as discussed above and decreased operating expenses.

Year Ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2015



 Year Ended
($ in millions)December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2016
Net sales$2,554.2
 $2,507.1
Gross profit$846.7
 $825.2
Gross profit %33.2% 32.9%
Operating income$439.9
 $399.8
Operating income %17.2% 15.9%
Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
CHCA


Net sales decreased $47.1 million, or 2%, over the prior year due to:

Discontinued products of $61.3 million related primarily to a label refresh within the infant formula category; and
A net $56.5 million decrease in existing product sales as a result of:
Strong sales in our infant nutrition, and smoking cessation categories; more than offset by
A milder cold and flu season in the first and second quarters of 2016, which led to weaker sales in the cough/cold and analgesics categories;
Pricing pressure, which impacted sales in the cough/cold, analgesics, and animal health categories in particular;
Lower sales in the antacids category; and
Timing of promotions in the second and third quarters of 2015 and a milder allergy season inDuring the third quarter of 2016, which had2021, supply chain disruptions, including a negative impact on year-over-year salessignificant shortage of truck drivers in the cough/cold category;U.S. and record delays at global shipping ports, led to higher unfulfilled customer orders and higher input costs compared to the prior year. In the fourth quarter of 2021, we took a series of actions to improve the situation, including reconfiguring our distribution system for short term shipments, outsourcing highly complex product lines to a third party logistic provider, adding regional carriers for challenged shipping lanes, hiring additional distribution center personnel, and increasing the purchase cycle as it relates to the manufacturing process. While we believe supply chain disruptions will continue in the near-term, we are expecting to continue to see improvements throughout 2022.
Lower year-over-year
During the first half of 2021, net sales of $52.1 million attributable to the U.S. VMS business, which was sold in August 2016;cough and
Unfavorable foreign currency translation movement of $15.0 million; offset partially by
New product sales of $117.4 million related primarily to the launches of fluticasone nasal spray (store brand equivalent to Flonase®), certain guaifenesin cold products (store brand equivalent to Mucinex®), several new infant formula and food products, and new animal health products; and
Incremental net sales of $20.3 million related primarily to the Gelcaps and ScarAway® acquisitions.

Operating income decreased $40.1 million, or 9%, as a result of:

A decrease of $21.5 millionthe very low incidence of cough and cold related illness, which we believe is attributed to social distancing and mask mandates put in gross profit due to:
Pricing pressure as noted above; and
Increased intangible asset amortization expense associated primarily with the Gelcaps and ScarAway® acquisitions; offset partially by
Margin contributions from new products and strong performanceplace to combat the spread of COVID-19. However, increased consumer takeaway at our retail customers, starting in May 2021, suggested normalizing consumer purchasing routines could be expected in the infant nutrition and smoking cessation categories; and
Continued manufacturing and supply chain efficiencies.

An increasesecond half of $18.6 million in operating expenses due to:
A $24.5 million goodwill impairment charge related to our animal health business, (refer to Item 8. Note 3);
Increased research and development investments of $6.5 million due to timing of clinical trials;
A $6.2 million impairment charge related to the sale of the U.S. VMS business, (refer to Item 8. Note 2);
A $3.7 million impairment charge recorded on the held-for-sale assets associated with our animal health pet treats plant, (refer to Item 8. Note 9); partially offset by
Decreased restructuring expense of $9.9 million (refer to Item 8. Note 18); and
Decreased selling and administrative expenses due to cost containment.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
CHCA


Six Months Ended December 31, 2015 vs. Six Months Ended December 27, 2014


 Six Months Ended
($ in millions)December 27,
2014
 December 31,
2015
Net sales$1,176.1
 $1,251.5
Gross profit$361.2
 $417.9
Gross profit %30.7% 33.4%
Operating income$151.1
 $209.2
Operating income %12.9% 16.7%
Net sales increased $75.4 million, or 6%, due primarily to:

New product sales of $122.9 million related primarily to certain new infant formula products;
Incremental net sales due primarily to the Gelcaps and ScarAway® acquisitions of $20.2 million; and
A$66.0 million increase in existing sales primarily attributable to increased sales volumes of smoking cessation, cough/2021. In the third quarter, we experienced higher demand for cough, cold and gastrointestinal products; offset partially by
A decline of $22.9 million in sales of existingpain products primarily in animal health and diabetic care;
Discontinued products of $99.6 million related primarily to reformulated infant formula, analgesic, and animal health products; and
Unfavorable foreign currency translation movement of $11.2 million.

Operating income increased $58.1 million, or 38%, as a result of:

An increase of $56.7 million in gross profit due to:
Improved purchase prices and efficiencies in manufacturing facilities; and
Incrementally higher gross profit attributable primarily to the Gelcaps and ScarAway® acquisitions; and

A decrease of $1.4 million in operating expenses due to:
Decreased R&D spend of $13.6 million due to relative timing of clinical trials; offset partially by
An increase in restructuring expense of $10.9 million related to strategic organizational enhancements; and
Increased administrative expenses of $1.9 million primarily related to the Gelcaps and ScarAway® acquisitions.

CONSUMER HEALTHCARE INTERNATIONAL

Recent Trends and Developments

Management has developed a strategy to: (1) implement a brand prioritization to address certain market dynamics, with an objective to balance the cost of advertising and promotional investments with expected contributions from category sales, (2) restructure the sales force in certain markets to more effectively serve customers, and (3) in-source certain product manufacturing and development. The combination of these actions is expected to improve the segment's focus on higher value OTC products, reduce selling costs and improve operating margins in the segment.

As part of our previously announced strategic initiatives, management implemented improvements and evaluated the overall cost structures within our CHCI segment in the following ways:

On December 8, 2016, we announced the cancellation of the unprofitable EuroGenerics NV distribution agreement in Belgium. The year-over-year effect of the cancellation, combined with the
Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
CHCI


exit of certain OTC distribution agreements, reduced our net sales by $200.3 million in 2017, with an immaterial impact to operating income.

We made progress on our previously announced restructuring plans to right-size the Omega business due to the impact of market dynamics on sales volumes. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we recognized $17.1 million of restructuring expense in the CHCI segment (refer to Item 8. Note 18).

Management continues to evaluate the most effective business model for each country, aligning our sales infrastructure and actively integrating sales strategies with promotional programs.

On August 25, 2017, we completed the sale of our Russian business, which was previously classified as held-for-sale, to Alvogen Pharma LLC. The total sale price was €12.7 million ($15.1 million), inclusive of an estimated working capital adjustment, which resulted in an immaterial gain in the segment (refer to Item 8. Note 2).

The combination of these actions improved the segment's focus on higher value OTC products, reduced selling costs and improved operating margins in the segment.

The CHCI segment has been positively impacted by market dynamics in countries such as the Nordics, Italy, and Portugal offset by softness in certain brand categories in France and Germany, as well as by unfavorable foreign currency impacts primarily in the U.K. related to Brexit.

Segment Results

Year Ended December 31, 2017 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2016



 Year Ended
($ in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2017
Net sales$1,652.2
 $1,491.0
Gross profit$693.4
 $682.0
Gross profit %42.0 % 45.7%
Operating income (loss)$(2,087.4) $12.5
Operating income (loss) %(126.3)% 0.8%


Net sales decreased $161.2 million, or 10%, over the prior year due to:

The absence of $200.3 million in sales attributable to the cancellation of unprofitable distribution contracts;
Discontinued products of $14.7 million; and
A net decrease in sales of existing products of $11.3 million due primarily to the absence of sales from our exited Russian business (refer to Item 8. Note 2); partially offset by
New product sales of $64.1 million.

Operating income increased $2.1 billion, due to:

A $11.4 million decrease in gross profit due primarily to:
Operational efficiencies across the organization; more than offset by
Lower volumes in sales; and
Lower margins in our U.K. store brand business.

A decrease of $2.1 billion in operating expenses due primarily to:
Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
CHCI


The absence of $2.0 billion of impairment charges on certain indefinite-lived and definite-lived intangible brand category assets and goodwill impairments in the Branded Consumer Healthcare-Rest of World ("BCH-ROW") and BCH-Belgium reporting units recorded in the prior year period (refer to Item 8. Note 3); and
A decrease in selling and administrative expenses of $66.6 million due to previously announced strategic initiatives to better align promotional investments with sales and cost reduction initiatives taken in the current year; offset partially by
A $4.8 million impairment charge recorded related to the Russian business (refer to Item 8. Note 2); and
Increased restructuring expense of $3.8 million related to strategic organizational enhancements (refer to Item 1. Note 18).

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 3.7% higher due primarily to improved product mix primarily driven by the cancellation of certain unprofitable distribution contracts, as described above.

Operating income as a percentage of net sales was 127.1% higher due primarily to the absence of $2.0 billion of intangible asset and goodwill impairment charges as discussed above (refer to Item 8. Note 3).

Year Ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2015


 Year Ended
($ in millions)
December 31, 2015(1)
 December 31,
2016
Net sales$1,360.6
 $1,652.2
Gross profit$614.7
 $693.4
Gross profit %45.2 % 42.0 %
Operating loss$(124.3) $(2,087.4)
Operating loss %(9.1)% (126.3)%

(1) Includes Omega results from March 30, 2015 to December 31, 2015.
Net sales increased $291.6 million, or 21%, over the prior year due to:

An additional three months of results from operations attributable to Omega;
New products totaling $119.0 million; and
Incremental nets sales due to the Naturwohl and GSK Product acquisitions totaling $84.2 million; offset partially by
A net $143.6 million decrease in sales volumes of existing products due primarily to:
Lower sales in the lifestyle category due in part to a product launch in the prior year;
Lower sales in the natural health and VMS category due primarily to timing of promotional activities;
Divestment of a European sports brand; and
The expiration of a distribution contract in the prior year;
Unfavorable foreign currency translation movement of $44.1 million; and
Discontinued products of $8.4 million.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
CHCI


Operating loss increased $2.0 billion, due to:

A $78.7 million increase in gross profit due to an additional three months of operations attributable to Omega; offset partially by
Decreased sales of existing products in the higher-margin lifestyle and natural health and VMS categories noted above;
Weaker performance in Belgium and Germany; and
Unfavorable foreign currency translation effect; more than offset by

An increase of $2.0 billion in operating expenses due primarily to:
Intangible asset and goodwill impairment charges totaling $2.0 billion, (refer to Item 8. Note 3); and
Restructuring charges totaling $20.9 million related to strategic organizational enhancements (refer to Item 8. Note 18);
An additional three months of operations from the Omega acquisition; offset partially by
Cost control measures.

Six Months Ended December 31, 2015 vs. Six Months Ended December 27, 2014



 Six Months Ended
($ in millions)December 27,
2014
 December 31,
2015
Net sales$177.1
 $833.0
Gross profit$55.9
 $386.0
Gross profit %31.6% 46.3 %
Operating income (loss)$14.1
 $(148.5)
Operating income (loss) %8.0% (17.8)%
Net sales increased $655.9 million, over the prior year due to:

Incremental net sales attributable to the Omega, Naturwohl and GSK acquisitions totaling $569.1 million; and
New products totaling $66.8 million; offset partially by
Unfavorable foreign currency translation movement of $14.8 million; and
Discontinued products of $3.8 million.

Operating income decreased $162.6 million, due to:

A $330.1 million increase in gross profit and a $492.7 million increase in operating expenses due to an additional six months of operations attributable to Omega.

PRESCRIPTION PHARMACEUTICALS

Recent Trends and Developments

We continue to experience a significant reduction in pricing expectations from historical levels in our RX segment due to competitive pressures. This softness in pricing is attributable to various factors, including increased focus from customers to capture supply chain productivity savings, competition in specific products, and consolidation of certain customers. We expect this softness to continue to impact the segment for the foreseeable future, and we are forecasting a high single digit pricing decline in this segment for the year ending December 31, 2018.

Perrigo Company plc- Item 7
RX



During the three months ended December 31, 2016, the U.S. market for Entocort® (Budesonide) capsules, including both brand and authorized generic capsules, experienced significant and unexpected increased competition, which reduced our future revenue stream. As a result, our net sales in the RX segment for the year ended December 31, 2017 were negatively impacted by $67.2 million.

We are continuing our previously announced portfolio review process, which includes the ongoing comprehensive internal evaluation of the RX segment's market position, growth opportunities, and interdependencies with our manufacturing and shared service operations to determine if strategic alternatives should be explored.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we sold various Abbreviated New Drug Applications ("ANDAs") for a total gain of $23.0 million.

Segment Results

Year Ended December 31, 2017 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2016



 Year Ended
($ in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2017
Net sales$1,042.8
 $969.7
Gross profit$501.1
 $449.7
Gross profit %48.1% 46.4%
Operating income (loss)$(0.2) $307.6
Operating income (loss) %% 31.7%
Net sales decreased $73.1 million, or 7%, due to:

New product sales of $75.9 million due primarily to sales of Scopolamine and Testosterone 2% topical (generic equivalent to Axiron®); more than offset by
Decreased sales of existing products of $78.5 million due primarily to pricing pressures across the portfolio;
Lower Entocort® sales of $67.2 million; and
Discontinued products of $3.3 million.

Operating income increased $307.8 million, as a result of:

A decrease of $51.4 million in gross profit due primarily to:
Lower Entocort® sales as noted above; and
Pricing pressures as discussed above.

A decrease of $359.2 million in operating expenses due to:
The absence of a $342.2 million impairment charge related to the Entocort® intangible asset (refer to Item 8. Note 3);
A $23.0 million gain on sales of certain ANDAs;
A $15.4 million net gain related to contingent consideration (refer to Item 8. Note 6);
Decreased selling expenses of $17.4 million due primarily to the prior year specialty pharmaceuticals sales force restructuring initiative;higher incidences of cough and
Decreased R&D expenses of $8.3 million due cold illness as society returned to timing of clinical trials, lower legal spend,in-person activities. Consumer take away continued to remain strong during the fourth quarter and, lower ongoing costs on certain projects; offset partially by
Impairment charges related to certain definite-lived intangible assets, certain fixed assets and IPR&D of $34.9 million (refer to Item 8. Note 3);
Perrigo Company plc- Item 7
RX



Increased administrative expenses of $6.2 million due primarily to the settlement of our antitrust violation lawsuit (refer to Item 8. Note 16); and
Increased restructuring expenses of $3.8 million related to strategic organizational enhancements (refer to Item 8. Note 18).

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 1.7% lower due primarily to lower sales of Entocort® as discussed above.

Operating income as a percentage of net sales was 31.7% higher due primarily to the absence of a $342.2 million impairment charge related to the Entocort® intangible asset (refer to Item 8. Note 3).

Year Ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2015



 Year Ended
($ in millions)December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2016
Net sales$1,001.9
 $1,042.8
Gross profit$543.3
 $501.1
Gross profit %54.2% 48.1%
Operating income (loss)$377.8
 $(0.2)
Operating income %37.7% %
Net sales increased $40.9 million, or 4%, due to:

Net sales attributable to the Entocort® and Tretinoin Products acquisitions totaling $150.9 million; and
New productas such, we expect sales of $68.0 million due primarilycough, cold and pain products to sales of Benzoyl Peroxide 5%-Clindamycin 1% gel (a generic version of Benzaclin™); offset partially by
Decreased sales of existing products of $174.1 million duecontinue to declined sales volume of certain products, pricing pressure across the portfolio, and the lack of exclusive market position for two key products versus the prior year; and
Discontinued products of $3.9 million.

Operating income decreased $378.0 million, or 100%, as a result of:

A decrease of $42.2 million in gross profit due primarily to the pricing pressure noted above, as well as higher amortization expense from the Entocort® and Tretinoin Products acquisitions; and

An increase, of $335.8 million in operating expenses due primarily to:
A $342.2 million impairment charge related to the Entocort® intangible assets, (refer to Item 8. Note 3);
Increased selling and administration expenses of $9.3 million, and
Increased R&D investments of $3.0 million due to timing of clinical trials; offset partially by
The absence of an $18.0 million R&D payment made in connection with a R&D contractual arrangement in the prior year (refer to Item 8. Note 17).

Perrigo Company plc- Item 7
RX



Six Months Ended December 31, 2015 vs. Six Months Ended December 27, 2014

 Six Months Ended
($ in millions)December 27,
2014
 December 31,
2015
Net sales$436.7
 $502.6
Gross profit$230.5
 $253.4
Gross profit %52.8% 50.4%
Operating income$168.8
 $181.9
Operating income %38.6% 36.2%
Net sales increased $65.9 million, or 15%, due primarily to:

New product sales of $41.2 million related primarily to the launches of Clobetasol Propionate 0.05% spray, Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment, and Testosterone gel 1%; and
Net sales attributable to the Lumara product acquisition of $7.0 million; offset partially by
A decrease in volumes of certain existing products.

Operating income increased $13.1 million, or 8%, as a result of:

An increase of $22.9 million in gross profit due primarily to:
Higher net sales and favorable product mix; and
Certain pricing initiatives.

Partially offset by a $9.8 millionincrease in operating expenses due to:
Increased selling and administration expense related to the specialty pharmaceuticals sales force; and
An increase in restructuring expense of $2.6 million related to our strategic organizational enhancements (refer to Item 8. Note 18).

SPECIALTY SCIENCES

Recent Trends and Developments

On March 27, 2017, we announced the completed divestment of our Tysabri® financial asset to Royalty Pharma for up to $2.85 billion, consisting of $2.2 billion in cash and up to $250.0 million and $400.0 million in milestone payments if the royalties on global net sales of Tysabri® that are received by Royalty Pharma meet specific thresholds in 2018 and 2020, respectively. As a result of this transaction, we transferred the entire financial asset to Royalty Pharma and recorded a $17.1 million gain during the three months ended April 1, 2017. We elected to account for the contingent milestone payments using the fair value option method, and these were recorded at an estimated fair value of $134.5 million as of December 31, 2017 (refer to Item 8. Note 6 and Critical Accounting Estimates for additional information on the contingent milestones).

Segment Results

Year Ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2015
Operating expenses were $201.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to $15.0 million for the prior year period. The decreases of $186.2 million primarily relates to a $199.6 million impairment charge related to the Tysabri® goodwill (refer to Item 8. Note 3).

Perrigo Company plc- Item 7
Specialty Sciences



Six Months Ended December 31, 2015 vs. Six Months Ended December 27, 2014

Operating expenses were $6.5 million for the six months ended December 31, 2015, compared to $9.0 million for the prior year period. The decreases of $2.5 million was due to a reduction in legal expenses.

See the Interest, Other and Change in financial asset (Consolidated) section below for discussionsdepending on the Tysabri® financial asset.trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic moving forward. Refer to "Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic" above.


OTHER

Recent Trends and Developments

On April 6, 2017,May 18, 2021, we completed the saleannounced a definitive agreement to sell our Latin American businesses to Advent International. This transaction is part of our India API businessmargin improvement program and our Project Momentum cost savings initiative and is expected to Strides Shasun Limited.close in the first half of 2022. We received $22.2 million of proceeds, inclusive of an estimated working capital adjustment, which resulted in an immaterial gain. Prior to closing the sale, we determined that the carrying value of the India API businessthese businesses exceeded itstheir fair value less the cost to sell, resulting in an impairment charge of $35.3$162.2 million which was recorded in Impairment charges on the Consolidated Statements of Operationsallocated to goodwill and assets held for the year ended December 31, 2016sale (refer to Item 8. Note 29).


On November 21, 2017, we completed the sale of our Israel API business, which was previously classified as held-for-sale, to SK Capital for a sale price of $110.0 million, which resulted in an immaterial gain recorded in our Other segment in Other expense (Income), net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations (refer to
57

Segment Financial Results


Year Ended December 31, 20172021 vs. Year Ended December 31, 20162020


Year Ended
(in millions, except percentages)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Net sales$2,693.1 $2,693.0 
Gross profit$765.1 $853.5 
Gross profit %28.4 %31.7 %
Operating income$206.5 $465.0 
Operating income %7.7 %17.3 %



 Year Ended
($ in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2017
Net sales$78.5
 $55.6
Gross profit$32.3
 $30.9
Gross profit %41.2% 55.6%
Operating income$6.1
 $8.7
Operating income %7.8% 15.6%
Net sales increased $0.1 million, or 0% due to:

Higher net sales in the Oral care, Skincare and personal hygiene, and Other categories offset decreases in Healthy lifestyle, Pain and sleep-aids, and Upper respiratory categories. Favorable Mexican peso foreign currency translation drove a 0.2%, or $4.9 million increase.
Year Ended
December 31, 2021
(in millions, except percentages)Sales$ Change% Change
Upper respiratory$483.1 $(22.7)(4.5)%
Digestive health475.1 3.8 0.8 %
Pain and sleep-aids405.4 (29.1)(6.7)%
Nutrition401.9 13.6 3.5 %
Oral care311.9 23.7 8.2 %
Healthy lifestyle297.7 (54.7)(15.5)%
Skincare and personal hygiene219.2 18.6 9.3 %
Vitamins, minerals, and supplements31.7 4.7 17.4 %
Other CSCA67.1 42.2 169.5 %
Total CSCA$2,693.1 $0.1 —%

Sales in each category were driven primarily by:

Upper respiratory: Net sales of $483.1 million decreased $22.9 million4.5% due primarily to competition on certainthe historically weak 2020- 2021 cough and cold season and the recall of an allergy product in the third quarter of 2021. Increased pricing and new products partially offset these declines;
Digestive health: Net sales of $475.1 million increased 0.8% due primarily to sales of unique 'national brand better' products, new products and e-commerce. These drivers were mostly offset by competition for a proton pump inhibitor and the salere-launch of our Israel APIa national brand acid reducer, which gained market share from competing store brand products;
Pain and sleep-aids: Net sales of $405.4 million decreased 6.7% due primarily to the historically weak 2020- 2021 cough and cold season, partially offset by higher sales of store brand diclofenac 1%;
Nutrition: Net sales of $401.9 million increased 3.5% driven by new products, including in the infant formula contract manufacturing business, (referand continued growth in oral electrolytes. These drivers were partially offset by lower sales in U.S. store brand infant formula due primarily to supply constraints earlier in the year;

Skincare and personal hygiene: Net sales of $219.2 million increased 9.3% due primarily to higher sales in the minoxidil franchise and the ScarAway® brand, partially offset by lower sales of creams for topical fungal infections; and
VMS and Other: Net sales of $98.8 million increased 90.4% due primarily to contract manufacturing sales to the divested RX business.

Operating income increased $2.6decreased $258.5 million, or 56%, due to a $1.4primarily to:

$88.4 million decrease in gross profit due primarily to unfavorable plant overhead absorption as a result of lower OTC production volumes resulting from the weak cough cold season, higher freight and input costs, and a product recall related to an allergy product. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased 330 basis points due primarily to unfavorable plant overhead absorption and the higher freight and input costs; and
$170.1 million increase in operating expenses due primarily to:
$173.7 million increase in other operating expenses due primarily to:
$162.2 million of impairment charges on goodwill and held for sale assets related to the Latin American businesses;
$4.0 million increase for the absence of an insurance reimbursement received in the prior year period; and
$7.1 million increase in restructuring costs related primarily with actions taken to streamline the organization and business integrations; partially offset by
$3.6 million decrease in distribution, R&D, selling, and administration expenses due to:
$10.6 million decrease in administrative expenses due primarily to a decrease in legal and professional fees; and
$4.5 million decrease in selling due primarily to a decrease in branded OTC business spend.; partially offset by
$11.8 million increase in distribution costs related primarily to increased warehouse costs.

Year Ended December 31, 2020 vs. December 31, 2019
Year Ended
(in millions, except percentages)December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Net sales$2,693.0 $2,487.7 
Gross profit$853.5 $794.2 
Gross profit %31.7 %31.9 %
Operating income$465.0 $406.7 
Operating income %17.3 %16.3 %

Net sales increased $205.3 million, or 8%, due primarily to:

$252.1 million, or 10%, net increase due primarily to an increase of $178.2 million in our Oral care category and from demand-driven growth in certain of our OTC product categories. CSCA continued to benefit from robust e-commerce growth.
Oral care net sales increased $168.2 million due to the acquisitions of Ranir and Dr. Fresh for sales in periods of 2020 with no comparable sales for 2019. In periods with comparable sales in 2019 and 2020, net sales grew $10.0 million driven by the incremental impact of new product sales and growth in the Plackers® brand. These increases were partially offset by declines in sales of travel-sized products related to COVID-19 travel restrictions.
OTC net sales increased $75.5 million due primarily to favorable consumer conversion to products in our Digestive health category, the increase of consumer COVID-19 related demand experienced in the first half of 2020 in the Pain and sleep aids category, and the incremental impact of new product
59

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
CSCA

sales led by Prevacid®, Diclofenac sodium topical gel 1%, and Esomeprazole Mini. These increases were partially offset by a decline of $38.6 million in sales of certain products in the Upper respiratory and Pain and sleep aids categories, primarily in the fourth quarter of 2020, resulting from the weak start to the cough cold season, and normal pricing pressure on certain products.
Nutrition net sales decreased $2.6 million due primarily to the decrease in infant formula product sales resulting from the prior year pre-build of contract pack inventory, operational challenges that led to a shortfall in achieving normal customer service levels, multi-year pricing contracts, and $5.7 million in discontinued products. These decreases were partially offset by new product sales from an infant formula launch at a major retailer in the prior year.
$46.8 million decrease due primarily to:
$43.7 million decrease due to our divested animal health business; and
$10.5 million decrease from unfavorable Mexican peso foreign currency translation; partially offset by
$7.4 million increase due to the absence of the Ranitidine retail market withdrawal impact included in the prior year.

Operating income increased $58.3 million, or 14%, due primarily to:

$59.3 million increase in gross profit due primarily to increased net sales as described above, partially offset by operating inefficiencies at one of our infant nutrition facilities as well as increased labor and overhead costs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased 20 basis points due primarily to the operating inefficiencies described above and pricing pressure on certain products, partially offset by the absence of the Ranitidine retail market withdrawal included in the prior year, and favorable product mix; further offset by
$1.0 million increase in operating expenses due primarily to:
$14.3 million increase in selling and administration expenses due primarily to the inclusion of expenses from our acquisitions of Ranir and Dr. Fresh and an increase in promotional expenses on branded products in advance of their pending market launches, partially offset by the absence of expenses from the divested animal health business and savings from our current Project Momentum cost savings initiative; partially offset by
The absence of a $7.1 million asset abandonment charge related to our waste water treatment plant in Vermont taken in the prior year; and
$4.0 million legal settlement received in 2020.

CONSUMER SELF-CARE INTERNATIONAL

Recent Trends and Developments

During the first half of 2021, net sales of cough and cold products decreased as a result of the very low incidence of cough, cold and flu related illness this year. We believe the very low incidence of cough, cold and flu related illness was attributed to COVID-19 social distancing and mask requirements. During the second half of 2021, we experienced higher demand for cough and cold, and pain products due primarily to the higher incidences of cough, cold and flu illness as society returned to in-person activities. The spread of certain COVID-19 variants may have contributed to these higher incidences as their symptoms can be similar. Further, consumer take away remained strong during the second half of 2021 led by cough and cold, and pain products and we expect further normalizing of consumer purchasing routines moving forward depending on the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic. Refer to "Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic".

During the third quarter, a number of EU regulators requested recalls, some at the consumer level, due to the detection of 2-chloroethanol (“2-CE”). 2-CE has been associated with the presence of ethylene oxide, a constituent in pesticides, which is not permitted for use in food products under food regulations in the EU. Due to the potential presence of ethylene oxide in certain of our VMS products, we initiated recalls. We have since secured alternate sourcing of the raw material. During the year ended December 31, 2021, these recalls resulted in a decrease in net sales of $2.6 million and a decrease in gross profit of $5.5 million, which included obsolete inventory.

60

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
CSCI

Segment Financial Results

Year Ended December 31, 2021 vs. December 31, 2020

Year Ended
(in millions, except percentages)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Net sales$1,445.6 $1,395.2 
Gross profit$651.1 $641.1 
Gross profit %45.0 %45.9 %
Operating income$36.1 $32.3 
Operating income %2.5 %2.3 %
Net sales increased $50.4 million, or 4% due to:

Higher net sales in the Skincare and personal hygiene category offset decreases in Upper respiratory category and Other. Favorable foreign currency translation drove a 4.0%, or $56.0 million increase.

Year Ended
December 31, 2021
(in millions, except percentages)Sales$ Change% Change
Skincare and personal hygiene$394.3 $42.5 12.1 %
Upper respiratory226.2 (28.9)(11.3)%
Vitamins, minerals, and supplements217.4 16.4 8.2 %
Pain and sleep-aids201.8 11.4 6.0 %
Healthy lifestyle179.3 13.9 8.4 %
Oral care95.8 (2.0)(2.0)%
Digestive health38.4 11.9 44.9 %
Other CSCI92.4 (14.8)(13.8)%
Total CSCI$1,445.6 $50.4 3.6 %

Sales in each category were driven primarily by:

Skincare and personal hygiene: Net sales of $394.3 million increased 12.1% driven primarily by the October 30, 2020 acquisition of three Eastern European OTC Dermatology Brands, increased market share in the ACO skincare franchise and new product launches in the Sebamed skincare portfolio. These drivers were partially offset by a decline in the anti-parasite portfolio and lower sales in Australia;
Upper respiratory: Net sales of $226.2 million decreased 11.3% due primarily to the historically weak 2020- 2021 cough and cold season, partially offset by new products;
VMS: Net sales of $217.4 million increase of 8.2% due primarily to a strong performance of Granufink, herbal medicines to keep bladder function healthy, and the launch of the Probify line of probiotics;
Pain & sleep-aids: Net sales of $201.8 million increased 6.0% due to higher sales of U.K.store brand and Tiger Balm were partially offset by declines in other pain products due primarily to the historically weak 2020- 2021 cough and cold season;
Healthy lifestyle: Net sales of $179.3 million increased 8.4% as growing demand for NiQuitin smoking cessation products and higher net sales in Australia were partially offset by lower net sales in the XLS Medical weight management franchise due primarily to lower category consumption;
Oral care: Net sales of $95.8 million decreased 2.0% due primarily to delayed receipt of product manufactured outside the E.U. in the second half of the year, leading to unfulfilled customer orders;
Digestive health and Other: Net sales of $130.8 million decreased 2.2% due primarily to lower distribution sales in Europe partially offset by higher sales in Australia.

61

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
CSCI

Operating income increased $3.8 million, or 12%, due to:

$10.0 million increase in gross profit due primarily to greater operating efficiencies, positive pricing and foreign currency translation, partially offset by an increase in lower margin product sales, the now-divested Rosemont pharmaceuticals business, and the VMS product recall. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased 90 basis points due primarily to unfavorable product mix and the VMS product recall, partially offset by greater operating efficiencies; and

$6.2 million increase in operating expenses due primarily to:
$10.9 million of impairment charges related to Oral Care International goodwill and certain IPR&D assets;
$4.6 million increase in restructuring expenses associated with actions taken to streamline the organization; partially offset by
$4.5 million decrease in selling, advertising and promotion ("A&P") expenses due primarily to negative consumption trends in the cough and cold and parasite products; and
$3.9 million decrease in distribution expense due primarily to lower volumes in the cough and cold products.

Year Ended December 31, 2020 vs. December 31, 2019

Year Ended
(in millions, except percentages)December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Net sales$1,395.2 $1,382.2 
Gross profit$641.1 $639.5 
Gross profit %45.9 %46.3 %
Operating income$32.3 $19.6 
Operating income %2.3 %1.4 %

Net sales increased $13.0 million, or 1%, due primarily to:
$47.4 million, or 3%, net increase due primarily to the increase of $45.3 million in sales from our acquisitions of Ranir, Dr. Fresh and Eastern European dermatology brands for periods of 2020 with no comparable sales in 2019, and the incremental impact of new product sales including line extensions in the ACO dermatology product line and the XLS Forte-Five weight management brand in the Skincare and personal hygiene and Healthy lifestyle categories, respectively. The segment also benefited from an increase in demand for products in our Pain and sleep-aids and VMS categories due to pandemic-related consumer behavior in favor of immune support, and an increase in sales from our U.K. store brand business. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in sales of existingcertain products in our Skincare and personal hygiene and Healthy lifestyle categories due to pandemic-related consumer behavior, school closings, social distancing measures and country lock-downs, a decline of $24.1 million for products in the Upper respiratory category from the weak start to the cough cold season experienced in the fourth quarter of 2020, and discontinued products of $10.0 million.
$34.4 million decrease due primarily to:
$40.3 million decrease due to our divested Rosemont pharmaceuticals business and Canoderm prescription product previously included in the Nordic region; partially offset by
$4.1 million increase from favorable foreign currency translation primarily related to the Euro; and
$1.8 million increase due to the absence of the Ranitidine retail market withdrawal impact included in the prior year.

62

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
CSCI

Operating income increased $12.7 million, or 65%, due to:

$1.6 million increase in gross profit due primarily to increased net sales as described above, partially offset by higher commodity costs for a $4.0certain OTC brand. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased 40 basis points due primarily to the addition of the Oral care category and improved performance in the U.K. store brand business which both have a relatively lower gross margins than the overall portfolio, the impact from divested businesses, and an increase in commodity costs for a certain OTC brand, partially offset by the absence of the Ranitidine retail market withdrawal included in the prior year; and

$11.1 million decrease in operating expenses. Theexpenses due primarily to:
$9.7 million decrease in operating expenses related primarilyimpairment charges due to an impairment taken in the absence ofprior year on a $8.3 million impairment charge recorded on the India API business and certain definite-lived intangible assets in the prior year; offset partially by a $3.3asset; and
$8.3 million impairment charge recorded on the Israel API business in the current period.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Other


Year Ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2015


 Year Ended
($ in millions)December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2016
Net sales$98.0
 $78.5
Gross profit$44.7
 $32.3
Gross profit %45.5 % 41.2%
Operating income (loss)$(7.1) $6.1
Operating income (loss) %(7.3)% 7.8%
Net sales decreased $19.5 million due primarily to competition on certain products, in particular, U.S. sales of Temozolomide. Operating income increased $13.2 milliondecrease due primarily to the absence of a $29.0 million impairment onrestructuring expenses related to the reorganization of our India API held-for-sale assets recordedsales force in France included in the prior year period (refer to Item 8. Note 9). Gross profit decreased $12.4year; partially offset by
$4.7 million as a result of increased competition, a $6.3increase in R&D expenses towards continued innovation efforts; and
$1.1 million impairment charge recorded on the India API held-for-sale business (refer to Item 8. Note 9),increase in selling and a $2.0 million impairment charge related to a definite-lived intangible asset (refer to Item 8. Note 3).

Six Months Ended December 31, 2015 vs. Six Months Ended December 27, 2014


 Six Months Ended
($ in millions)December 27,
2014
 December 31,
2015
Net sales$54.8
 $45.1
Gross profit$26.2
 $21.6
Gross profit %47.7% 47.8 %
Operating income (loss)$14.5
 $(19.5)
Operating income (loss) %26.4% (43.3)%
Net sales decreased $9.7 million, or 18%,administration expenses due primarily to competition on certain products and unfavorable changes inEuro foreign currency translation. Operating income decreased $34.0 million astranslation, and the inclusion of expenses from our acquisitions of Ranir and Dr. Fresh, partially offset by a resultreduction in selling, advertising and promotional expenses, the absence of a decreaseexpenses from the divestiture of $4.6 million in gross profit due primarily to a decrease in sales of existing productsour Rosemont pharmaceuticals business, and an impairment charge of $29.0 million onsavings from our India API held-for-sale assets (refer to Item 8. Note 9).current Project Momentum cost savings initiative.


Unallocated Expenses


Unallocated expenses are comprised of certain corporate services not allocated to our reporting segments and are recorded above Operating income on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Unallocated expenses were as follows (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
$(167.8)$232.4 $251.6 
Six Months Ended Year Ended
December 27,
2014
 December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2017
$49.6
 $149.0
 $220.9
 $116.6
 $174.7


The decrease of $400.2 million in unallocated expenses during the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the prior year period was due primarily to the award in the claim arising from the Omega Acquisition, as described in Item 8. Note 19, for $417.6 million, TSA income from the acquirer of our former RX business, decreased employee compensation expense, and Project Momentum cost savings initiative. This was partially offset by an increase in legal and professional fees, a reduction in an insurance recovery receivable related to litigation contingencies, and an increase in restructuring expenses.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Other


The $58.1$19.2 million increase for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the prior year was due primarily to an increase in share-based compensation expense of $12.6 million driven primarily by the resignation of certain executives, an increase of $41.1 million of administrative expenses driven by legal fees, consulting fees and employee-related expenses, and an increase in restructuring of $6.0 million related to strategic organizational enhancements (refer to Item 8. Note 15).

The $104.3 million decrease for the year ended December 31, 20162020 compared to the prior year was due primarily to the absence of $15.6 million in acquisition and integration-related charges related to the acquisition of Ranir, a $14.8 million decrease in legal and professionalconsulting fees relatedin part due to our defense against the unsolicited takeover bid by Mylan of $100.3current Project Momentum cost savings initiative, and a $12.6 million and Omega acquisition-related fees of $18.1 million. We also experienced a $15.0 million reductiondecrease in share-based compensation compared to the prior year dueRestructuring expense related primarily to the resignationreorganization of our former Chief Executive Officer, Joseph C. Papa.executive management team. These decreases were partially offset partially by a $36.2 millionan increase in legal and professional fees in the current year.

The $99.4 million increase for the six months ended December 31, 2015 compared to the prior year period was due primarily to $86.9of $15.7 million in fees incurred in our defense against the unsolicited takeover bid by Mylanemployee incentive compensation expenses, which included COVID-19 bonuses for production employees, and $7.5an increase of $8.0 million in corporate restructuring charges.insurance-related expenses.

Interest, Other and Change in Financial Assets (Consolidated)
63
 Six Months Ended Year Ended
($ in millions)December 27,
2014
 December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2017
Change in financial assets$(46.9) $(57.3) $(88.8) $2,608.2
 $24.9
Interest expense, net$56.7
 $89.9
 $179.1
 $216.6
 $168.1
Other expense (Income), net$60.3
 $25.2
 $299.1
 $22.7
 $(10.1)
Loss on extinguishment of debt$9.6
 $0.9
 $1.8
 $1.1
 $135.2

Change in Financial Assets

Prior to its divestiture on March 27, 2017, we accounted for the Tysabri® royalty stream as a financial asset and had elected to use the fair value option model with changes in fair value presented in Net income (loss) under the caption Change in financial assets. Royalty rights were $24.9 million of expense, $2.6 billion of expense and $88.8 million of income for the years ended December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Royalty rights were $57.3 million of income and $46.9 million of income for the six months ended December 31, 2015 and December 27, 2014, respectively. Royalty rights were $78.5 million of income and $26.6 million of income for the years ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, respectively, resulting in a change in financial asset of $2.6 billion, $2.7 billion, $10.4 million, and $51.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016, six months ended December 31, 2015, and the year ended June 27, 2015 compared to the prior year periods, respectively (refer to Item 8. Note 6 for additional information on the assumptions).

In the first quarter of 2016, a competitor's pipeline product, Ocrevus®, received breakthrough therapy designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"). Breakthrough therapy designation is granted when a drug is intended alone or in combination with one or more other drugs to treat a serious or life threatening disease or condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development. In June 2016, the FDA granted priority review with a target action date in December 2016. A priority review is a designation when the FDA will direct overall attention and resources to the evaluation of applications for drugs that, if approved, would be significant improvements in the safety or effectiveness of the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions when compared to standard applications. The product was approved late in the first quarter of 2017. The product is expected to compete with Tysabri®, and we expected it to have a significant negative impact on the Tysabri® royalty stream. Industry analysts believe that, based on released clinical study information, Ocrevus® will compete favorably against Tysabri® in the relapsing, remitting multiple sclerosis market segment due to its high efficacy and convenient dosage form.


Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Unallocated, Interest, Other, and Taxes



Change in Financial Assets, Interest expense, net, Other (income) expense, net and Loss on extinguishment of debt (Consolidated)
Given the new market information for Ocrevus®, we used industry analyst estimates to reduce
Year Ended
(in millions)December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Change in financial assets$— $95.3 $(22.1)
Interest expense, net$125.0 $127.7 $117.5 
Other (income) expense, net$26.7 $16.3 $(68.9)
Loss on extinguishment of debt$— $20.0 $0.2 

Change in Financial Assets

The proceeds from our first ten year growth forecasts from an average growth2017 sale of approximately 3.4% in the fourth calendar quarter of 2015 to an average decline of approximately minus 2.0% in the third and fourth calendar quarters of 2016. In November 2016, we announced we were evaluating strategic alternatives for the Tysabri® financial asset. As of December 31, 2016, the financial asset was adjusted based on the strategic review and sale process. These effects, combined with the change in discount rate each quarter, led to a reduction in fair value of $204.4 million, $910.8 million, $377.4 million and $1.1 billion in the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2016, respectively.

On March 27, 2017, we announced the completed divestment of our Tysabri® financial asset to Royalty Pharma for up to $2.85 billion, consistingconsisted of $2.2 billion in upfront cash and up to $250.0 million and $400.0 million in contingent milestone payments if the royalties on global net sales of Tysabri® that are received by Royalty Pharma meet specific thresholds inrelated to 2018 and 2020, respectively. As a result of this transaction, we transferred the entire financial asset to Royalty Pharma and recorded a $17.1 million gain during the three months ended April 1, 2017. We elected to account for the contingent milestone payments using the fair value option method, and these were recorded at an estimated fair value of $134.5 million as of December 31, 2017. We chose the fair value option as we believe it will help investors understand the potential future cash flows we may receive associated with the two contingent milestones.


We valued the contingent milestone payments using a modified Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model ("BSOPM"). Key inputs in the BSOPM are the estimated volatility and rate of return of royalties on global net sales of Tysabri® that are received by Royalty Pharma over time until payment of the contingent milestone payments is completed. Volatility and the estimated fair value of the milestones have a positive relationship such that higher volatility translates to a higher estimated fair value of the contingent milestone payments. In the valuation of contingent milestone payments performed, we assumed volatility of 30.0% and a rate of return of 8.07% as of December 31, 2017. We assess volatility and rate of return inputs quarterly by analyzing certain market volatility benchmarks and the risk associated with Royalty Pharma achieving the underlying projected royalties. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, Royalty Pharma payments from Biogen for Tysabri® sales, as defined in the agreement between the parties, did not exceed the 2020 global net sales threshold of $351.0 million. Therefore, we are not entitled to receive the remaining contingent milestone payment of $400.0 million and, accordingly, wrote off the entire fair value of the Royalty Pharma contingentremaining milestone payments decreased $42.0 million, as a resultpayment related to 2020 of the decrease in the estimated projected Tysabri® revenues due to the launch of Ocrevus® late in the first quarter of 2017.

In addition, payment of the contingent milestone payments is dependent on global net sales of Tysabri®. Of the $134.5 million of estimated fair valued contingent milestone payments as of December 31, 2017, $79.7 million and $54.8 million relates to the 2018 and 2020 contingent milestone payments, respectively. If Tysabri® global net sales do not meet the prescribed threshold in 2018, we will write off the $79.7 million asset as an expense to Change in financial assets on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. If the prescribed threshold is exceeded, we will write up the asset to $250.0 million and recognize income of $170.3$95.3 million in Change in financial assets on the Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations. If Tysabri® global net sales do not meet the prescribed threshold in 2020, we will write off the $54.8 million asset as an expense to Change in financial assets on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. If the prescribed threshold is exceeded, we will write up the asset to $400.0 million and recognize income of $345.2 million in Change in financial assets on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Global Tysabri® net sales need to exceed $1.9 billion and $2.0 billion in 2018 and 2020, respectively, in order for Royalty Pharma to receive the level of royalties needed to trigger the milestone payments owed to us. Tysabri® net sales are anticipated to decline on a global basis in 2018, compared to 2017, due to increased competition from Ocrevus®, offset by volume growth in Tysabri® international marketsOperations (refer to Item 8. Note 67). As of December 31, 2020, there were no contingent milestone payments outstanding.


Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, net was $168.1 million forDuring the year ended December 31, 2017, compared2019 the fair value of the contingent milestone payment related to $216.62020 increased by $22.1 million to $95.3 million. These adjustments were driven by higher projected global net sales of Tysabri® and the estimated probability of achieving the earn-out. The Royalty Pharma payments from Biogen for Tysabri® were $337.5 million in 2018, which triggered the prior year. The $48.5$250.0 million decrease for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the prior year was the result of the early debt repayments mademilestone payment received during the year ended December 31, 2017.2019.


Interest expense,Expense, net    was $216.6

The $2.7 million fordecrease during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $179.1 million in the prior year. The $37.5 million increase for the year ended December 31, 20162021 compared to the prior year was due primarily to a reduction in interest incurred on the debt assumed in the Omega acquisition and borrowings onexpense related to our revolving credit agreements2018 Revolver (as defined below).

The $10.2 million increase during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Unallocated, Interest, Other, and Taxes


Interest expense, net was $89.9 million for the six months ended December 31, 2015, compared to $56.7 million in the prior year period. The $33.2 million increase for the six months ended December 31, 20152020 compared to the prior year period was due primarily to the incremental increaseaddition of interest expense on our 2020 Notes and two promissory notes related to our equity method investment in borrowings resulting from the Omega acquisition, including the issuance of $1.6 billion of senior notes in November 2014 and assumed Omega debt, of which $798.3 million was outstanding at December 31, 2015,Kazmira, as well as amounts drawn under our revolving credit facilities, including $380.0 million and $300.0 million outstanding under the 2015 Revolver and 2014 Revolver, respectively, at December 31, 2015.a reduction of interest income.
    
See the "Borrowings and Capital Resources" section below and Item 8. Note 10 for more information.Other (Income) Expense, Net


Other Expense (Income), Net     

OtherThe $10.4 million increase in expense (Income), net, was $10.1 million forduring the year ended December 31, 2017,2021 compared to $22.7 million in the prior year. The $32.8 million decreaseyear was due primarily to the absence of a $22.3 million equity investment impairment, $8.2 million of favorableunfavorable changes in revaluation of monetary assets and liabilities held in foreign currencies and a $3.2partially offset by the absence of an $18.7 million reduction in equity method losses.pre-tax loss on the divestiture of our Rosemont Pharmaceuticals business.


OtherThe $85.2 million change from income to expense (Income), net, was $22.7 million forduring the year ended December 31, 2016,2020 compared to $299.1 million in the prior year. The $276.4 million decreaseyear was due primarily to the absence of the $259.8pre-tax gain of $71.7 million loss incurred in the prior year on the derivatives used to economically hedge fluctuations insale of our animal health business and the euro-denominated purchase price of the Omega and GSK Products acquisitions. The losses$21.1 million pre-tax loss on the derivatives due to the changes in the EUR/USD exchange rate prior to their settlement economicallydivestiture of our Rosemont Pharmaceuticals business, partially offset the final settlementby a decrease of the euro-denominated Omega purchase price paid on March 30, 2015.

Other expense (Income), net, was $25.2 million for the six months ended December 31, 2015, compared to $60.3$2.6 million in the prior year period. The $35.1 million decrease was due primarily to a $10.7 million other-than-temporary impairment of a marketable equity security, losses on equity method investments totaling $7.1 million, and a $4.8 million loss on a foreign currency derivative we entered into, to hedge against the change in the euro for the euro-denominated purchase price of the GSK Products acquisition, offset by the absence of a $64.7 million loss related to derivative activity to economically hedge fluctuations in the euro-denominated purchase price of the Omega acquisition and a gain of $12.5 millionunfavorable changes from the transferrevaluation of a rights agreement.
See monetary assets and liabilities held in foreign currencies (refer to Item 8. Note 8 for more information on the derivatives3).

64

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Unallocated, Interest, Other, and Item 8. Note 7 for information on the investments.Taxes


Loss on Extinguishment of Debt


During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, we recorded a $135.2loss of $20.0 million loss on extinguishmentas a result of debt, which consistedthe early redemption of tenderthe 3.500% Senior Notes due March 15, 2021 and 3.500% Senior Notes due December 15, 2021, consisting of the premium on debt repayments, transaction costs,the write-off of deferred financing fees, and the write-off of the remaining bond discounts related(refer to the $500.0 million 3.500% senior notes due December 2021, $500.0 million 3.500% senior notes due March 2021, $400.0 million 4.900% senior notes due 2044, $800.0 million 4.000% senior notes due 2023, and $400.0 million 5.300% senior notes due 2043.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we recorded a $1.1 million loss on extinguishment of debt, which consisted of deferred financing fees we wrote off primarily related to the prepayment of 1.300% 2016 Notes. During the six months and year ended December 31, 2015 we recorded a $0.9 million and $1.8 million loss on extinguishment of debt, respectively, which consisted of deferred financing fees we wrote off related to the undrawn tranche of certain credit facilities that we allowed to expire during the period. The $9.6 million and $10.5 million losses during the six months and year ended December 27, 2014 and June 27, 2015, respectively, consisted mainly of interest on the bridge agreement associated with financing the Omega acquisition. The $165.8 million loss recorded in the year ended June 28, 2014 consisted of make-whole payments, write-off of unamortized discounts, write-off of deferred financing fees, and interest on the bridge agreements associated with financing the Elan acquisition.

See Item 8. Note 213 for information on the Omega acquisition, and Item 8. Note 10 for information on the extinguishment of debt.).

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Unallocated, Interest, Other, and Taxes


Income Taxes (Consolidated)


The effective tax rates were as follows:
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
150.6 %(655.8)%(7.2)%
Six Months Ended Year Ended
December 27,
2014
 December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2017
14.0% (376.2)% 103.3% 17.2% 57.3%


The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2017 was higher2021 as compared to the year ended December 31, 20162020 increased primarily due to an increasethe settlement of the Irish Notice of Assessment recorded in the valuation allowance position due to current year activity, tax law changes in the U.S., increases in unrecognized tax benefits, offset by tax law changes in Belgium.2021.


The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2016 was lower2020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 20152019 decreased primarily due to the impact of the asset impairments recorded during the year ended December 31, 2016. The effectivepre-tax profit mix between jurisdictions with varying tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2015 was impacted by the impairment of Omega's intangible assets, India API assets being classified as held for sale, the valuation allowance on deferred taxesrates along with U.S. CARES Act and Omega transaction costs.Proposed and Final Section 163(j) interest expense limitation effects.

The effective tax rate for the six months ended December 31, 2015 was significantly higher than for the six months ended December 27, 2014 due mainly to the impairment of Omega’s intangible assets and the related impacts on the valuation allowance position, as well as our India API assets being classified as held for sale. The effective tax rate was favorably affected by a reduction in the reserves for uncertain tax liabilities in the amount of $6.1 million for the six months ended December 31, 2015 related to various audit resolutions.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, statutory income tax rate changes in the U.S. and Belgium impacted the effective tax rate with a reduction to U.S. income tax expense of $2.4 million and increased Belgium income tax expense by $24.1 million. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, statutory income tax rate changes, primarily in Europe, favorably impacted the effective tax rate by $27.9 million and $4.0 million, respectively (refer to Item 8. Note 14).

FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY, AND CAPITAL RESOURCES


We finance our operations with internally generated funds, supplemented by credit arrangements with third parties and capital market financing. We routinely monitor current and expected operational requirements and financial market conditions to evaluate other available financing sources including term and revolving bank credit and securities offerings. In determining our future capital requirements, we regularly consider, among other factors, known trends and uncertainties, such as the Notices of Proposed Adjustment ("NOPAs") from the IRS, the current COVID-19 pandemic, the conflict in Ukraine, and other contingencies. We note that no payment of the additional amounts proposed by the IRS in the NOPAs is currently required, and no such payment is expected to be required, unless and until a settlement or other final determination of the matter is reached that is adverse to us. Refer to Item 8. Note 17 for additional information on the NOPAs. Based on our current financial condition and credit relationships,the foregoing, management believes that our operations and borrowing resources are sufficient to provide for our currentshort-term and foreseeablelong-term capital requirements.requirements, as described below. However, an adverse result with respect to our appeal of any material outstanding tax assessments or litigation, including securities or drug pricing matters and product liability cases, damages resulting from third-party claims, and related interest and/or penalties, could ultimately require the use of corporate assets to pay such assessments and any such use of corporate assets would limit the assets available for other corporate purposes. As such, we continue to evaluate the impact of commercial and capital market conditionsthe above factors on liquidity and may determine that modifications to our capital structure are appropriate if market conditions deteriorate, or if favorable capital market opportunities become available.available, or any change in conditions relating to the NOPAs, the COVID-19 pandemic, the conflict in Ukraine or other contingencies have a material impact on our capital requirements.


We previously had an RX segment which was comprised of our prescription pharmaceuticals business in the U.S. and other pharmaceuticals and diagnostic businesses in Israel, which have been divested. The RX segment was reported as Discontinued Operations in 2021, and is presented as such for all periods in this report. Cash flows from discontinued operations are reported within the consolidated statement of cash flows, and select cash flow information related to discontinued operations are presented in Item 8. Note 8. We received $1.5 billion in cash upon the completion of the RX business sale on July 6, 2021. We intend to use a portion of these proceeds to fund the acquisition of HRA Pharma (refer to Item 8. Note 3).

We also received $417.6 million relating to the claim arising from the Omega Acquisition in September 2021. A portion of these proceeds were used for the settlement of the NoA dispute with Irish Revenue.

65

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources



Cash and Cash Equivalents


prgo-20211231_g7.jpg
*Working capital represents current assets less current liabilities, excluding cash and cash equivalents, assets and liabilities held for sale, and excluding current indebtedness.


Cash, cash equivalents, cash flows from operations, and borrowings available under our credit facilities are expected to be sufficient to finance the known and/or foreseeableour liquidity and capital expenditures.expenditures in both the short and long term. Although our lenders have made commitments to make funds available to us in a timely fashion under our revolving credit agreements and overdraft facilities, if economic conditions worsen, including due to the COVID-19 pandemic, or new information becomes publicly available impacting the institutions’ credit rating or capital ratios, these lenders may be unable or unwilling to lend money pursuant to our existing credit facilities. Should our outlook on liquidity requirements change substantially from current projections, we may seek additional sources of liquidity in the future.


Cash Generated by (Used in) Operating Activities

prgo-20211231_g8.jpg
Year Ended December 31, 20172021 vs. Year Ended December 31, 20162020


The $479.9 million decrease in operating cash inflow was due primarily to:
 Year Ended
($ in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2017
 Increase/(Decrease)
Cash Flows From (For) Operating Activities     
Net income (loss)$(4,012.8) $119.6
 $4,132.4
Non-cash adjustments4,769.2
 683.2
 (4,086.0)
Subtotal756.4
 802.8
 46.4
      
Increase (decrease) in cash due to:     
Accounts receivable(0.6) 3.2
 3.8
Inventories100.7
 (16.0) (116.7)
Accounts payable(75.7) (39.6) 36.1
Payroll and related taxes(41.1) (27.4) 13.7
Accrued customer programs(13.9) 34.6
 48.5
Accrued liabilities(79.5) (47.8) 31.7
Accrued income taxes20.9
 (6.1) (27.0)
Other, net(12.3) (4.8) 7.5
Subtotal$(101.5) $(103.9) $(2.4)
      
Net cash from operating activities$654.9
 $698.9
 $44.0

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources


We generated $698.9$253.7 million ofdecrease in cash flow from operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2017, a $44.0 million increase over the prior year period, due to the following:

Increasedchange in net earnings after adjustments for items such asincluding impairment charges, deferred income taxes, impairment charges, restructuring charges, changes in our financial assets, share-based compensation, amortization of debt premium, loss (gain) on sale of businesses, loss on extinguishment of debt, and depreciation and amortization;

Changes$328.6 million decrease in accrued customer-related programscash flow from the change in accounts receivable, due primarily to new product launches, resulting in higher customer related-accruals, pricing dynamics in the RX segment, as well as timing of rebate and chargeback payments;

Changes in accounts payable due primarily to changes to the Omega accounts payable structure that occurred in the prior year period; and

Changes in accrued liabilities due primarily to deferred revenue associated with BCH-Belgium distribution contracts and the absence of accruals related to the sale of our U.S. VMS business; partially offset by increased litigation accruals (refer to Item 8. Note 16), and fair market value adjustments related to contingent consideration (refer to Item 8. Note 6); offset partially by

Changes in inventory due to the build up of inventory levels to support customer demands in the current period; offset by improved inventory management in the comparable prior year period; and

Changes in accrued income taxes due primarily to Federal tax obligation payments made in the current year period, offset by expected tax refunds (refer to Item 8. Note 14).

Year Ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2015

 Year Ended
($ in millions)December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2016
 Increase/ (Decrease)
Cash Flows From (For) Operating Activities     
Net loss$(1.9) $(4,012.8) $(4,010.9)
Non-cash adjustments745.4
 4,769.2
 4,023.8
Subtotal743.5
 756.4
 12.9
      
Increase (decrease) in cash due to:     
Accounts receivable4.8
 (0.6) (5.4)
Inventories(21.5) 100.7
 122.2
Accounts payable(26.7) (75.7) (49.0)
Payroll and related taxes(42.0) (41.1) 0.9
Accrued customer programs53.9
 (13.9) (67.8)
Accrued liabilities98.9
 (79.5) (178.4)
Accrued income taxes(67.9) 20.9
 88.8
Other, net21.3
 (12.3) (33.6)
Subtotal$20.8
 $(101.5) $(122.3)
      
Net cash from operating activities$764.3
 $654.9
 $(109.4)

We generated $654.9 million of cash from operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2016, a $109.4 million decrease over the prior year, due primarily to the following:

Changes in accrued liabilities due primarily to payment of legal expenses associated with the Mylan defense which were accrued at December 31, 2015, deferred revenue associated with the BCH Belgium Distribution Contracts,our discontinued operations and timing of sales and receipt of payments;

66

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources



Changes$63.8 million decrease in cash flow from the change in accrued customer-relatedpayroll and related taxes, due primarily to the timing of payroll and the increase in annual management and employee bonus payments compared to the prior year period; and
$40.7 million decrease in cash flow from the change in accrued income taxes, due primarily to the cash escrow payment to the Israel Tax Authority relating to their review of a 2009 transaction (for which no formal assessment or notice of deficiency has been filed); partially offset by
$168.2 million increase in cash flow from the change in inventory, due primarily to inventory increases in the prior year period which did not persist in the current year. Inventory increases in the prior year were partially related to inventory builds to improve customer service, combined with lower demand for certain products and customers lowering their inventories.
$44.7 million increase in cash flow from the change in accrued customer programs, due primarily to the pricing dynamics in the RX segment; and
timing of rebate and chargeback payments related to our discontinued operations.


Changes in accounts payable due to changes to the Omega accounts payable structure as discussed below; offset partially by

Changes in inventories due to improved inventory management in our CHCI and CHCA segments and increased sales of cough/cold products at the end of the year endedYear Ended December 31, 2016; and
2020 vs. December 31, 2019

Changes in accrued income taxes due primarily to the prior year including a $68.9 million incremental tax payment made in connection with the contested IRS audit (refer to Item 8. Note 14).


In addition, increased net earnings after adjusting for non-cash items such as impairment charges, loss on extinguishment of debt, changes in our financial assets, and depreciation and amortization contributed to anThe $248.4 million increase in operating cash flow.flow was due primarily to:

Six Months Ended December 31, 2015 vs. Six Months Ended December 27, 2014

 Six Months Ended
($ in millions)December 27,
2014
 December 31,
2015
 Increase / (Decrease)
Cash Flows From (For) Operating Activities     
Net income$180.6
 $42.5
 $(138.1)
Non-cash adjustments88.6
 279.2
 190.6
Subtotal269.2
 321.7
 52.5
      
Increase (decrease) in cash due to:     
Accounts receivable(3.4) 52.5
 55.9
Inventories(19.4) (29.6) (10.2)
Accounts payable(46.8) (194.1) (147.3)
Payroll and related taxes(26.3) (38.2) (11.9)
Accrued customer programs51.8
 34.4
 (17.4)
Accrued liabilities52.1
 108.1
 56.0
Accrued income taxes33.1
 (56.8) (89.9)
Other, net(18.3) 2.9
 21.2
Subtotal$22.8
 $(120.8) $(143.6)
      
Net cash from operating activities$292.0
 $200.9
 $(91.1)

We generated $200.9$309.6 million ofincrease in cash from operating activities during the six months ended December 31, 2015, a $91.1change in accounts receivable, due primarily to timing of sales and receipt of payments;
$67.5 million decrease overincrease in cash from the comparable prior year period,change in accrued income taxes, due primarily to the following:CARES Act and adoption of final and proposed 163(j) regulations, as well as the absence of tax liabilities on the Royalty Pharma contingent milestone payment received in the prior year and Israeli withholding tax paid in the prior year; and

$14.5 million increase in cash from the change in accrued payroll and related taxes, due primarily to the CARES Act payroll tax payment deferrals; partially offset by
Changes$103.6 million decrease in cash from the change in inventory, due primarily to the buildup of inventory levels to improve customer service levels in the CSCA and CSCI segments, as well as higher inventory levels due to a reduction in sales for certain products and an increase in inventory for new product launches in the CSCI segment, partially offset by the current year launch of new products in our discontinued operations;
$31.6 million decrease in cash from the change in other, due primarily to the $29.4 million change in prepaid expenses, mainly from payments made for annual prepaid expenses, a payment made for a transitional service agreement, an increase in the cost of our directors and officers prepaid insurance, and the absence of a litigation related settlement received in the prior year, partially offset by payments received related to our cross currency swap; and
$19.7 million decrease in cash from the change in accounts payable, due primarily to the addition of Omega as well as changes to the Omega accounts payable structure as discussed below; and

Changes in accrued income taxes due primarily to a $68.9 million incremental tax payment made in connection with the contested IRS audit (refer to Item 8. Note 14); offset partially by

Changes in accrued liabilities due primarily to amounts not yet paid related to our defense against Mylan;

Changes in accounts receivable due to timing of receiptpayments and mix of payments; andpayment terms.

Increased net earnings after adjusting for non-cash items such as impairment charges, changes in our financial assets, and depreciation and amortization.


67

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources



Cash Generated by (Used in) Investing Activities
In addition, our operatingprgo-20211231_g9.jpg

Year Ended December 31, 2021 vs. December 31, 2020

The $1,463.6 million increase in cash from investing cash flow was negatively impacted by $57.7due primarily to:
$1,304.1 million increase in legalcash flow due to the proceeds from the RX business sale, which substantially exceeded the proceeds from the prior year divestiture of our Rosemont Pharmaceuticals business (refer to Item 8. Note 3);
$168.5 million increase in cash flow due to the absence of cash paid in the prior year for the acquisitions of Dr. Fresh for $106.2 million and consulting fees related to our defense against Mylan.

Due toEastern European dermatology brands for $62.3 million the payment made in the prior year for the acquisition of Omega on March 30, 2015, our CHCI segment experienced strong operatingDr. Fresh (refer to Item 8. Note 3);
$15.0 million increase in cash inflow in the second quarter of 2015 and cash outflow in the third quarter of 2015 primarilyflow due to accounts payablethe absence of the payment structures with suppliers that increased the days outstanding in the second and fourth quarter compared to the first and third quarters. In order to establish a more sustainable cash flow pattern during the calendar year, in the fourth quarter of 2015 and continuing into the first quarter of 2016, we implemented a program to standardize these payment terms such that the days outstanding will largely be consistent each reporting period. This program had an unfavorable impact on accounts payable and operating cash flow in these quarters.

Investing Activities

Year Ended December 31, 2017 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2016

 Year Ended
($ in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2017
 Increase/(Decrease)
Cash Flows From (For) Investing Activities
Proceeds from royalty rights$353.7
 $87.3
 $(266.4)
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired(427.4) (0.4) $427.0
Asset acquisitions(65.1) 
 $65.1
Proceeds from sale of securities4.5
 
 $(4.5)
Additions to property, plant and equipment(106.2) (88.6) $17.6
Net proceeds from sale of business and other assets69.1
 154.6
 $85.5
Proceeds from sale of the Tysabri® financial asset

 2,200.0
 $2,200.0
Other investing, net(3.6) (14.8) $(11.2)
Net cash from (for) investing activities$(175.0) $2,338.1
 $2,513.1

Cash generated from investing activities totaled $2.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to cash used of $175.0 millionmade in the prior year. The inflowyear for the purchase of our equity method investment in Kazmira LLC; and
$18.3 million increase in cash flow due to the current year waschange in capital spending, due primarily to the completed divestmentreduced spending as a result of our Tysabri® financial asset to Royalty Pharma, for which we received $2.2 billioncurrent year divestitures; partially offset by
$35.4 million decrease in cash at closing (referflow due toItem 8. Note 6). In addition, we received $154.6 million the increase in cashspending on asset acquisitions, primarily related to the salepayment for an ANDA for a generic topical gel for $16.4 million and the purchase of our Israel API businessan ANDA for a generic topical lotion for $53.3 million, which exceeded prior year acquisitions for the Steripod® brand for $25.1 million and theDexsil® brand for approximately $8.0 million (refer toItem 8. Note 23). The outflow in the prior year was due primarily to the acquisition of a portfolio of generic dosage forms and strengths of Retin-A® ("Tretinoin"), a topical prescription acne treatment from Mattawan Pharmaceuticals, LLC, and the Generic Benzaclin™ product rights, which used $478.4 million in cash. The outflow was offset partially by proceeds from royalty rights of $353.7 million.


Cash used for capital expenditures totaled $88.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $106.2 million in the prior year. The decrease in cash used for capital expenditures was due primarily to the decrease in the number of manufacturing projects in the current year compared to the prior year. Capital expenditures for the next twelve months are anticipated to be between $90.0$100.0 million and $115.0
$140.0 million, depending on the progression of project timelines, related to manufacturing productivity capacity and quality/regulatory projects.efficiency upgrades, infant formula plant investments, software and technology initiatives, and general plant maintenance. We expect to fund these estimated capital expenditures with funds from operating cash flows.

Year Ended December 31, 2020 vs. December 31, 2019

The $408.3 million decrease in cash used in investing cash flow was due primarily to:
$579.2 million decrease in cash used due to the absence of the payment made in the prior year for the acquisition of Ranir for $747.7 million, partially offset by the cash paid for the acquisitions of Dr. Fresh for $106.2 million and Eastern European dermatology brands for $62.3 million (refer to Item 8. Note 3);
$113.9 million decrease in cash used due to the decrease in spending on asset acquisitions, as payments made in the prior year to purchase the Steripod® brand for $25.1 million and theDexsil® brand for approximately $8.0 million, represented a decline in spending compared to the cash used in prior year acquisitions, including for the branded OTC rights to Prevacid®24HR for $61.7 million, two ANDAs for generic products for
68

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources



$15.7 million and $49.0 million, and Budesonide Nasal Spray and Triamcinolone Nasal Spray for $14.0 million (refer to Item 8. Note 3); and

Year Ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2015

 Year Ended
($ in millions)December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2016
 Increase/ (Decrease)
Cash Flows From (For) Investing Activities
Proceeds from royalty rights$335.1
 $353.7
 $18.6
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired(2,886.4) (427.4) 2,459.0
Asset acquisitions(4.0) (65.1) (61.1)
Settlement of acquisition-related foreign currency derivatives(304.8) 
 304.8
Proceeds from sale of securities
 4.5
 4.5
Additions to property, plant and equipment(166.8) (106.2) 60.6
Proceeds from sale of business
 69.1
 69.1
Other investing, net(2.7) (3.6) (0.9)
Net cash from (for) investing activities$(3,029.6) $(175.0) $2,854.6

Cash used for investing activities totaled $175.0$5.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, a $2.9 billion decrease over the prior year. The outflowincrease in the year ended December 31, 2016 wascash due primarily to the acquisitionsnet proceeds from the sale of our Rosemont pharmaceuticals business, which exceeded the proceeds from the prior year's sale of our animal health business (refer to Item 8. Note 3); partially offset by
$250.0 million decrease in cash flow due to the absence of the Tretinoin Products and the Generic Benzaclin™ product rights, which used $478.4 million in cash, offset partially by $353.7 million ofRoyalty Pharma contingent milestone proceeds from royalty rights. The outflowreceived in the prior year was due primarily(refer to $2.9 billion used for business acquisitions, most notably Omega, as well as $304.8 million related to the cash settlement of the non-designated foreign currency derivatives we used to hedge the euro-denominated Omega and GSK Products purchase prices. See Item 8. Note 27);
$32.7 million decrease in cash due to a net increase in capital spending, used primarily to increase tablet and infant formula capacity, plant efficiency projects, investments in our Oral care business, and for software and technology initiatives; and
$15.0 million decrease in cash for the purchase of our equity method investment in Kazmira (refer to Item 8. Note 810 for more information on the above-mentioned acquisitions and derivatives, respectively.).


Cash used for capital expenditures totaled $106.2 million during year endedGenerated by (Used in) Financing Activities
prgo-20211231_g10.jpg
Year Ended December 31, 2016 compared to $166.82021 vs. December 31, 2020

The $2.4 million increase in the prior year. The decrease in capital expenditures over the prior yearfinancing cash flow was due primarily to:

$590.0 million increase due to several large infrastructure projects nearing completion.payments on long-term debt in 2020 that were not made in 2021;

$164.2 million increase due to share repurchases in 2020 that were not made in 2021; and
Six Months Ended December 31, 2015 vs. Six Months Ended December 27, 2014

 Six Months Ended
($ in millions)December 27,
2014
 December 31,
2015
 Increase / (Decrease)
Cash Flows From (For) Investing Activities
Proceeds from royalty rights$175.8
 $166.3
 $(9.5)
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired(83.0) (791.6) $(708.6)
Settlement of acquisition-related foreign currency derivatives(26.4) (1.3) $25.1
Additions to property, plant and equipment(48.0) (77.8) $(29.8)
Other investing, net0.8
 (3.7) $(4.5)
Net cash from (for) investing activities$19.2
 $(708.1) $(727.3)

Cash used for investing activities totaled $708.1$19.0 million forincrease due to the six months ended December 31, 2015, compared to cash from investing activitiespayment of $19.2 millionpremiums in the prior year period. The cash outflow forrelated to the six months endedearly redemption of the 2021 Notes that were not made in 2021; partially offset by
$743.8 million decrease due to absence of the debt issuance completed in the prior year; and
$26.7 million decrease due primarily to the payment made on the promissory notes related to our Kazmira investment.

Year Ended December 31, 20152020 vs. December 31, 2019

The $182.9 million decrease in financing cash flow was to complete the Entocort®, GSK and Naturwohl acquisitions, offset partially by proceeds from royalty rights of $166.3 million. During the six months ended December 27, 2014, we used $83.0due primarily to:
$164.2 million decrease in cash due to completeshare repurchases;
$114.0 million decrease in cash due to the Lumara products acquisition, and $26.4increase in payments on long-term debt;
$19.0 million decrease in cash due to hedge the euro-denominated Omega purchase price, and received $175.8 million in proceeds from royalty rights (refer to Item 8. Note 2 and Item 8. Note 8 for more informationpayment of premiums on the above-mentioned acquisitionsearly redemption of the 3.500% Senior Notes due March 15, 2021 and derivatives, respectively). Capital expenditures for the six months ended3.500% Senior Notes due December 31, 2015 totaled $77.8 million, compared to $48.0 million in the comparable prior year period.15, 2021;

69

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources



$11.5 million decrease in cash due to an increase in dividend payments;

Financing Activities

Year Ended December 31, 2017 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2016

 Year Ended
($ in millions)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2017
 Increase/(Decrease)
Cash Flows From (For) Financing Activities
Issuances of long-term debt$1,190.3
 $
 $(1,190.3)
Borrowings (repayments) of revolving credit agreements and other financing, net(802.5) 6.8
 809.3
Payments on long-term debt(559.2) (2,611.0) (2,051.8)
Deferred financing fees(2.8) (4.8) (2.0)
Premium on early debt retirement(0.6) (116.1) (115.5)
Issuance of ordinary shares8.3
 0.7
 (7.6)
Equity issuance costs(10.3) 
 10.3
Repurchase of ordinary shares
 (191.5) (191.5)
Cash dividends(83.2) (91.1) (7.9)
Other financing, net(8.7) 2.3
 11.0
Net cash for financing activities$(268.7) $(3,004.7) $(2,736.0)

Cash used for$5.7 million decrease in cash due to an increase in deferred financing activities totaled $3.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $268.7 million of cash used for financing activities for the prior year. In the current year, cash used for financing included $2.6 billion of repayments on long-term debt, $116.1 million of premium on early debt retirementfees related to the current year debt extinguishmentissuance of long-term debt; and $191.5
$4.4 million decrease in share repurchases, as discussed below. In the prior year, the cash used for financing activities was due primarily to borrowingsthe payment made on the November 2020 portion of $1.2 billionthe Kazmira promissory notes; partially offset by
$143.8 million increase in cash for the issuance of long-term debt more than offset by net repayments on our revolving credit agreements and other short-term financing of $802.5 million and net repayments on our long-term debt of $559.2 million.
Year Ended December 31, 2016 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2015

 Year Ended
($ in millions)December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2016
 Increase / (Decrease)
Cash Flows From (For) Financing Activities     
Borrowings (repayments) of revolving credit agreements and other financing, net$666.0
 $(802.5) $(1,468.5)
Issuances of long-term debt
 1,190.3
 1,190.3
Payments on long-term debt(917.3) (559.2) 358.1
Premium on early debt retirement
 (0.6) (0.6)
Deferred financing fees(3.6) (2.8) 0.8
Issuance of ordinary shares8.9
 8.3
 (0.6)
Equity issuance costs
 (10.3) (10.3)
Repurchase of ordinary shares(500.0) 
 500.0
Cash dividends(72.2) (83.2) (11.0)
Other financing, net(19.0) (8.7) 10.3
Net cash from (for) financing activities$(837.2) $(268.7) $568.5

Cash used for financing activities totaled $268.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared(refer to $837.2 million for the prior year. In the year ended December 31, 2016, cash used for financing included $802.5 million to repay balances outstanding under our revolving credit agreements and other short-term financing, $500.0 million used to prepay our 1.300% 2016 Notes, and $59.2 million in scheduled debt payments. These
Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources


payments were offset by the borrowing of $1.2 billion of long-term debt. In the year ended December 31, 2015, the cash used for financing activities was due primarily to payments of $917.3 million on long-term debt, which included the repayment of debt assumed from Omega and a $300.0 million legacy Perrigo term loan, and $500.0 million used to repurchase shares under our share purchase plan. This was offset by $666.0 million of net borrowings under our revolving credit facilities and other short term borrowings.

Six Months Ended December 31, 2015 vs. Six Months Ended December 27, 2014

 Six Months Ended
($ in millions)December 27,
2014
 December 31,
2015
 Increase / (Decrease)
Cash Flows From (For) Financing Activities
Issuances of long-term debt$2,504.3
 $
 $(2,504.3)
Borrowings (repayments) of revolving credit agreements and other financing, net(2.1) 718.0
 $720.1
Payments on long-term debt(934.5) (28.3) $906.2
Deferred financing fees(24.8) (0.3) $24.5
Issuance of ordinary shares1,039.5
 4.9
 $(1,034.6)
Equity issuance costs(35.7) 
 $35.7
Repurchase of ordinary shares
 (500.0) $(500.0)
Cash dividends(29.0) (36.3) $(7.3)
Other financing, net(8.8) (8.4) $0.4
Net cash from financing activities$2,508.9
 $149.6
 $(2,359.3)

Cash generated from financing activities totaled $149.6 million for the six months ended December 31,
2015, compared to $2.5 billion for the comparable prior year period. The net cash inflow during the six months
ended December 31, 2015 was due to net borrowings under our revolving credit facilities of $680.0 million and net
borrowings under our overdraft facilities and other short term borrowings of $38.0 million, offset partially by $500.0 million used to repurchase shares under our share repurchase plan, $36.3 million in dividend payments, and $28.3 million in scheduled principal payments on our euro-denominated term loan. The cash generated during the six months ended December 27, 2014 was due to financing activities to fund the Omega acquisition. The Omega financing included raising $1.6 billion of debt, net of discount and issuance costs, and issuing 6.8 million ordinary shares, which raised $999.3 million, net of issuance costs. In addition, we refinanced certain of our debt totaling $907.6 million.

For more information see "Borrowings and Capital Resources" below and Item 8. Note 1013).


Share Repurchases


In October 2015, the Board of Directors approved a three-year share repurchase plan of up to $2.0 billion. Following the expiration of our 2015 share repurchase plan authorization in October 2018, our Board of Directors authorized up to $1.0 billion of share repurchases with no expiration date, subject to the Board of Directors’ approval of the pricing parameters and amount that may be repurchased under each specific share repurchase program. We did not repurchase any shares during the year ended December 31, 2021 or December 31, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, we repurchased 2.73.4 million ordinary shares at an average repurchasepurchase price of $71.72$48.28 per share for a total of $191.5 million. We did not repurchase any shares$164.2 million under the share repurchase plan during the year ended December 31, 20162018 Authorization.During the six months ended December 31, 2015, we repurchased 3.3 million ordinary shares at an average repurchase price of $151.59 per share, for a total of $500.0 million.


Dividends


In January 2003, the Board of Directors adopted a policy of paying quarterly dividends. We paid dividends as follows:
Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
 Year Ended
 December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Dividends paid (in millions)$129.6 $123.9 $112.4 
Dividends paid per share$0.96 $0.90 $0.82 
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources


 Six Months Ended Year Ended
 December 27,
2014
 December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2017
Dividends paid (in millions)$29.0
 $36.3
 $83.2
 $91.1
Dividends paid per share$0.21
 $0.25
 $0.58
 $0.64


The declaration and payment of dividends, if any, is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our earnings, financial condition, availability of distributable reserves, capital and surplus requirements, and other factors our Board of Directors may consider relevant.


Dividends paid were as follows:
Declaration Date Record Date Payable Dividend Declared
       
Year Ended December 31, 2017
November 2, 2017 December 1, 2017 December 19, 2017 $0.160
August 8, 2017 August 25, 2017 September 12, 2017 $0.160
May 3, 2017 May 26, 2017 June 13, 2017 $0.160
February 21, 2017 March 3, 2017 March 21, 2016 $0.160
       
Year Ended December 31, 2016
November 8, 2016 November 25, 2016 December 13, 2016 $0.145
August 2, 2016 August 26, 2016 September 13, 2016 $0.145
April 26, 2016 May 27, 2016 June 14, 2016 $0.145
February 16, 2016 February 26, 2016 March 15, 2016 $0.145
       
Six Months Ended December 31, 2015
November 4, 2015 November 27, 2015 December 15, 2015 $0.125
August 12, 2015 August 28, 2015 September 15, 2015 $0.125

Borrowings and Capital Resources

prgo-20211231_g11.jpgprgo-20211231_g12.jpg
70

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources



Term Loans, Notes and Bonds

Total Term Loans, Notes and Bonds outstanding are summarized as follows (in millions):

Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Term loan
2019 Term loan due August 15, 2022$600.0 $600.0 
Notes and bonds
CouponDue
*5.105%July 28, 2023$153.5 $164.9 
4.000%November 15, 2023215.6 215.6 
3.900%December 15, 2024700.0 700.0 
4.375%March 15, 2026700.0 700.0 
3.900%June 15, 2030750.0 750.0 
5.300%November 15, 204390.5 90.5 
4.900%December 15, 2044303.9 303.9 
Total notes and bonds$2,913.5 $2,924.9 

*    Debt denominated in euros subject to fluctuations in the euro-to-U.S. dollar exchange rate.

On June 19, 2020, Perrigo Finance Unlimited Company, an indirect wholly-owned finance subsidiary of Perrigo ("Perrigo Finance"), issued $750.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.150% Senior Notes due 2030 (the “2020 Notes"). Due to a credit ratings downgrade by S&P and Moody's in the third quarter of 2021, the interest of the 2020 Notes has stepped up from 3.150% to 3.900%, starting with the interest payment due on December 15, 2021.

On July 6, 2020, the proceeds of the 2020 Notes were used to fund the redemption of Perrigo Finance's $280.4 million of 3.500% Senior Notes due March 15, 2021 and $309.6 million of 3.500% Senior Notes due December 15, 2021. As a result of the early redemption of the $280.4 million of 3.500% Senior Notes and $309.6 million of 3.500% Senior Notes, during the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded a loss of $20.0 million in Loss on extinguishment of debt on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, consisting of the premium on debt repayments, the write-off of deferred financing fees, and the write-off of the remaining bond discounts.

71

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

On May 23, 2019, we repaid our 5.000% retail bond due in 2019 in the amount of €120.0 million ($130.7 million), which we assumed in connection with the Omega acquisition.

Refer to Item 8. Note 13 for additional details regarding our debt financing transactions.

Overdraft Facilities


We have overdraft facilities available that we use to support our cash management operations. We report any balances outstanding in "Other Financing" in Item 8,8. Note 1013. The balanceThere were no borrowings outstanding under the facilities was $6.9 million and $82.9 million atas of December 31, 20172021 and December 31, 2015, respectively,2020.

Leases

We had $199.1 million and there were no balances outstanding under the facilities at$187.7 million of lease liabilities and $194.8 million and $184.5 million of lease assets as of December 31, 2016.2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.

On March 30, 2015, we assumed and repaid certain overdraft facilities totaling €51.4 million ($56.0 million) with the Omega acquisition.


Accounts Receivable Factoring


We haveDuring the year ended December 31, 2020, we had accounts receivable factoring arrangements with non-related third-party financial institutions (the “Factors”). Pursuant to the terms of the arrangements, we sell to the Factors certain of our accounts receivable balances on a non-recourse basis for credit approved accounts. An administrative fee per invoice is charged on the gross amount of accounts receivables assigned to the Factors, and interest is calculated at the applicable EUR LIBOR rate plus a spread. TheAt December 31, 2020, the total amount factored on a non-recourse basis and excluded from accounts receivable was $27.5 million, $50.7 million, and $64.5 million at$6.9 million. During the year ended December 31, 2017, December 31, 20162021, the factoring program was discontinued and December 31, 2015, respectively.there were no amounts factored on a non-recourse basis and excluded from accounts receivable.


Revolving Credit AgreementsAgreement


On December 9, 2015, our 100% owned finance subsidiary, Perrigo Finance Unlimited Company (formerly Perrigo Finance plc) ("Perrigo Finance"),March 8, 2018, we entered into a $750.0 million$1.0 billion revolving credit agreement maturing on March 8, 2023 (the "2015"2018 Revolver"). On March 15, 2016, we used the proceeds of the long-term debt issuance described below under "2016 Notes" to repay the $750.0 million thenThere were no borrowings outstanding under the 20152018 Revolver as ofDecember 31, 2021 or December 31, 2020.

Waiver and Amendment of Debt Covenants

We are subject to financial covenants in the 2018 Revolver and terminated2019 Term Loan, including a maximum leverage ratio covenant, which previously required us to maintain a ratio of Consolidated Net Indebtedness to Consolidated EBITDA (as such terms are defined in such credit agreements) of not more than 3.75 to 1.00 at the facility.

On March 30, 2015,end of each fiscal quarter. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we assumedreceived a revolvingwaiver for non-compliance with such covenants as of July 3, 2021, from the lenders under both such credit facility with €500.0 million ($544.5 million) outstandingfacilities and entered into amendments to each of the 2018 Revolver and 2019 Term Loan. Due to the waiver and amendment described above, our leverage ratios at the end of the second and third quarters of 2021 do not prevent us from Omega. On April 8, 2015, we repaid the €500.0 million ($539.1 million) outstandingdrawing under the assumed revolving credit facility and terminated the facility.

On2018 Revolver. Additionally, on December 5, 2014,3, 2021, we, Perrigo Finance, each lender party thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as administrative agent, entered into a $600.0 million revolving credit agreement,Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s 2019 Term Loan (the “Term Loan Amendment”) and Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s 2018 Revolver (the “Revolver Amendment”) with the lenders under each such facility, pursuant to which the maximum leverage ratio was increased to $1.0 billion on March 30, 2015 (the "2014 Revolver"). On March 15, 2016,5.75 to 1.00 for the fourth quarter of 2021 and the first quarter of 2022, returning to 3.75 to 1.00 beginning with the second quarter of 2022. If we usedconsummate certain qualifying acquisitions in the proceedssecond quarter of 2022 or any subsequent quarter during the term of the long-term debt issuance described below under "2016 Notes"loan, the maximum ratio would increase to repay4.00 to 1.00 for such quarter. The amendments also modified certain provisions related to restricted payments to account for the $435.0 million then outstandingamended leverage ratio covenant. Finally, the Revolver Amendment contains amendments related to the replacement of LIBOR with the Sterling Overnight Index Average (SONIA) as the benchmark for borrowings under the 2014 Revolver. There2018 Revolver in Pounds Sterling. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we incurred amendment and arrangement fees of $1.4 million in connection with these amendments, which were no borrowings outstanding undercapitalized and will be amortized over the 2014 Revolver aslife of the debt. As of December 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016.
Term Loans, Notes and Bonds

We had $2.9 billion, $5.4 billion, and $4.7 billion outstanding2021, we are in compliance with all the covenants under our notes and bonds, and $420.0 million,$420.7 million, and $488.8 million outstanding under our term loan, as of December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively. On September 29, 2016, we repaid the 1.300% senior notes due 2016 in full.debt agreements.

Other Financing

On March 7, 2016, Perrigo Finance issued $500.0June 17, 2020, we incurred debt of $34.3 million related to our equity method investment in aggregate principal amount of 3.500% senior notes due 2021 and $700.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.375% senior notes due 2026 (together, the "2016 Notes") and received net proceeds of $1.2 billion after fees and market discount, which were used to repay the amounts outstanding under the 2015 Revolver and 2014 Revolver mentioned above.
On September 2, 2014, we offered to exchange what were previously private placement senior notes for public bonds registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Substantially all of the private placement senior notes have been exchanged.
On December 2, 2014, Perrigo Finance, our 100% owned finance subsidiary, issued $500.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% senior notes due 2021, $700.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.90% senior notes due 2024, and $400.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.90% senior notes due 2044 (collectively, the "2014 Bonds").
The 2014 Bonds are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by Perrigo CompanyKazmira
72

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources



plc,pursuant to two promissory notes, with $3.7 million, $5.8 million and no other subsidiary of Perrigo Company plc guarantees the 2014 Bonds. We may redeem the 2014 Bonds at any time under the terms of the applicable indenture, subject$24.8 million to the payment of a make-whole premium.
be settled in November 2020, May 2021 and November 2021, respectively (refer to Item 8. Note 10). On December 5, 2014, Perrigo Finance entered into a term loan agreement consisting of a €500.0 million ($614.3 million) tranche, with the ability to draw an additional €300.0 million ($368.6 million) tranche, maturing December 5, 2019, and we entered into a $300.0 million term loan tranche maturing December 18, 2015, which we repaid in full on June 25, 2015.
On December 5, 2014,8, 2020, we repaid the remaining $895.0$3.7 million outstanding under our 2013 Term Loan described below, then terminated it.
On June 24, 2015, we repaidbalance due on the $300.0 millionNovember 2020 portion of the 2014 Term Loan.
On March 30, 2015, we assumed $20.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.19% senior notes due 2016 (the "2016 Notes"), €135.0 million ($147.0 million) aggregate principal amount of 5.1045% senior notes due 2023, €300.0 million ($326.7 million) in aggregate principal amount of 5.125% retail bonds due 2017, €180.0 million ($196.0 million) in aggregate principal amount of 4.500% retail bonds due 2017, and €120.0 million ($130.7 million) in aggregate principal amount of 5.000% retail bonds due 2019 (collectively, the "Retail Bonds") in connection with the Omega acquisition.
The fair value of the 2023 Notes and Retail Bondsexceeded par value by €93.6 million($101.9 million) on the date of the acquisition. As a result, a fair value adjustment was recorded as part of the carrying value of the underlying debt and will be amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining terms of the respective debt instruments. The adjustment does not affect cash interest payments.
On May 29, 2015, we repaid the $20.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2016Promissory Notes.

Debt Repayments and Related Extinguishment During the Year Ended December 31, 2017

During the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, we reduced our outstanding debt through a variety of transactions (in millions):
Date Series Transaction Type Principal Retired
April 1, 2017 2014 term loan due December 5, 2019 Scheduled quarterly payment $13.3
May 8, 2017 $600.0 2.300% senior notes due 2018 Early redemption 600.0
May 23, 2017 €180.0 4.500% retail bonds due 2017 Scheduled maturity 201.3
June 15, 2017 $500.0 3.500% senior notes due 2021 Tender offer 190.4
June 15, 2017 $500.0 3.500% senior notes due 2021 Tender offer 219.6
June 15, 2017 $800.0 4.000% senior notes due 2023 Tender offer 584.4
June 15, 2017 $400.0 5.300% senior notes due 2043 Tender offer 309.5
June 15, 2017 $400.0 4.900% senior notes due 2044 Tender offer 96.1
July 1, 2017 2014 term loan due December 5, 2019 Scheduled quarterly payment 14.3
September 30, 2017 2014 term loan due December 5, 2019 Scheduled quarterly payment 14.8
December 12, 2017 €300.0 5.125% senior notes due 2017 Scheduled maturity 352.3
December 31, 2017 2014 term loan due December 5, 2019 Scheduled quarterly payment 15.0
      $2,611.0

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources


As a resultrepaid the $5.8 million balance due on the May 2021 portion of the of the early redemption and tender offer transactions discussed above, we recorded a loss of $135.2 million during the three months ended July 1, 2017 in Loss on extinguishment of debt (in millions):

Premium on debt repayment $116.1
Transaction costs 3.8
Write-off of deferred financing fees 10.6
Write-off of remaining discount on bond 4.7
Total loss on extinguishment of debt $135.2

We entered into amendments on March 16, 2017 related to the 2014 RevolverPromissory Notes and the 2014 Term Loan providing for additional time to deliver certain financial statements, as well as$24.8 million balance due on the modification of certain financial and other covenants. We also entered into additional amendments toNovember 2021 portion, settling the 2014 Revolver and the 2014 Term Loan on April 25, 2017 to modify provisions of such agreements necessary as a result of the correctiondebt in accounting related to the Tysabri® financial asset, as well as waivers of any default or event of default that may arise from any restatement of or deficiencies in our financial statements for the periods specified in such amendments and waivers. No default or event of default existed prior to entering into these amendments and waivers. We are in compliance with all covenants under our debt agreements as of December 31, 2017.full.
See Item 1. Note 10 for more information on all of the above debt facilities.


Credit Ratings
    
OurDuring the third quarter of 2021, our credit ratings onwere downgraded by Moody’s and S&P Global Ratings to Ba1 (negative) and BB (stable), respectively, which are not investment grade ratings. On December 31, 2017 were Baa3 (stable) and2021, our credit rating was BBB- (stable)(negative) by Moody's Investors Service and Standard and Poor's Rating Services, respectively.Fitch Ratings Inc., which is an investment grade rating.


Credit rating agencies review their ratings periodically and, therefore, the credit rating assigned to us by each agency may be subject to revision at any time. Accordingly, we are not able to predict whether current credit ratings will remain as disclosed above. Factors that can affect our credit ratings include changes in operating performance, the economic environment, our financial position, and changes in business strategy. If changes in our credit ratings were to occur, they could impact, among other things, future borrowing costs, access to capital markets, and vendor financing terms. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have a material current effect or that are reasonably likely to have a material future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, net sales or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.

Contractual Obligations


Our enforceable and legally binding obligations as of December 31, 20172021 are set forth in the following table. Some of the amounts included in this table are based on management’s estimates and assumptions about these obligations, including the duration, the possibility of renewal, anticipated actions by third parties and other factors. Because these estimates and assumptions are necessarily subjective, the enforceable and legally binding obligations actually paid in future periods may vary from the amounts reflected in the table (in millions).:
 Payment Due
20222023-20242025-2026After 2026Total
Short and long-term debt (1)
$726.1 $1,286.6 $823.6 $1,575.8 $4,412.1 
Finance lease obligations5.6 6.3 4.3 13.7 29.9 
Purchase obligations (2)
862.6 3.0 — — 865.6 
Operating leases (3)
29.9 41.9 32.2 94.9 198.9 
Other contractual liabilities reflected on the consolidated balance sheets:
Deferred compensation and benefits (4)
— — — 72.5 72.5 
Other (5)
22.3 18.4 9.2 — 49.9 
Total$1,646.5 $1,356.2 $869.3 $1,756.9 $5,628.9 
 Payment Due
 2018 2019-2020 2021-2022 After 2022 Total
Short and long-term debt (1)
$198.3
 $746.9
 $791.9
 $2,767.8
 $4,504.9
Capital lease obligations0.8
 1.4
 
 
 2.2
Purchase obligations (2)
757.2
 13.7
 0.1
 
 771.0
Operating leases (3)
38.1
 56.2
 32.3
 16.6
 143.2
Other contractual liabilities reflected on the consolidated balance sheets:         
Deferred compensation and benefits (4)

 
 
 92.1
 92.1
Other (5)
90.0
 6.6
 4.9
 1.5
 103.0
Total$1,084.4
 $824.8
 $829.2
 $2,878.0
 $5,616.4


(1)
Short-term and long-term debt includes interest payments, which were calculated using the effective interest rate at December 31, 2017.
(2)
Consists of commitments for both materials and services.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 7(1)Short-term and long-term debt includes interest payments, which were calculated using the effective interest rate at December 31, 2021.
Financial Condition, Liquidity(2)Consists of commitments for both materials and Capital Resourcesservices.

(3)Used in normal course of business, principally for warehouse facilities and computer equipment.

(4)Includes amounts associated with non-qualified plans related to deferred compensation, executive retention and post-employment benefits. Of this amount, we have funded $38.4 million, which is recorded in Other non-current assets on the balance sheet. These amounts are assumed payable after five years, although certain circumstances, such as termination, would require earlier payment.
(3)
Used in normal course of business, principally for warehouse facilities and computer equipment.
(4)
Includes amounts associated with non-qualified plans related to deferred compensation, executive retention and post employment benefits. Of this amount, we have funded $34.6 million, which is recorded in Other non-current assets on the balance sheet. These amounts are assumed payable after five years, although certain circumstances, such as termination, would require earlier payment.
(5)
Primarily includes consulting fees, legal settlements, contingent consideration obligations, restructuring accruals, insurance obligations, and electrical and gas purchase contracts, which were accrued in Other current liabilities and Other non-current liabilities at December 31, 2017 for all years.

(5)Primarily includes consulting fees, legal settlements, restructuring accruals, insurance obligations, and electrical and gas purchase contracts, which were accrued in Other current liabilities and Other non-current liabilities at December 31, 2021 for all years.

We fund our U.S. qualified profit-sharing and investment plan in accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 regulations for the minimum annual required contribution and Internal Revenue Service regulations for the maximum annual allowable tax deduction. We are committed to making the required minimum contributions, which we expect to be approximately $25.9$36.5 million over the next 12 months. Future contributions are dependent upon various factors, including employees’ eligible compensation, plan participation and changes, if any, to
73

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

current funding requirements. Therefore, no amounts were included in the Contractual Obligations table above. We generally expect to fund all future contributions with cash flows from operating activities.


As of December 31, 2017,2021, we had approximately $501.7$452.3 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions.positions, including interest and penalties. These unrecognized tax benefits have been excluded from the Contractual Obligations table above due to uncertainty as to the amounts and timing of settlement with taxing authorities.


Net deferred income tax liabilities were $311.5$232.8 million as of December 31, 2017.2021. This amount is not included in the Contractual Obligations table above because we believe this presentation would not be meaningful. Net deferred income tax liabilities are calculated based on temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their book basis, which will result in taxable amounts in future years when the book basis is settled. The results of these calculations do not have a direct connection with the amount of cash taxes to be paid in any future periods. As a result, scheduling net deferred income tax liabilities as payments due by period could be misleading because this scheduling would not relate to liquidity needs.


Critical Accounting Estimates


The determination of certain amounts in our financial statements requires the use of estimates. These estimates are based upon our historical experiences combined with management’s understanding of current facts and circumstances. Although the estimates are considered reasonable based on the currently available information, actual results could differ from the estimates we have used. Management considers the below accounting estimates to require the most judgment and to be the most critical in the preparation of our financial statements. These estimates are reviewed by the Audit Committee.


Customer-Related Accruals and AllowancesRevenue Recognition


We generally record revenues fromNet product sales when the goods are shipped to the customer. For customers with Free on Board ("FOB") destination terms, a provision is recorded to exclude shipments estimated to be in-transit to these customers at the endinclude estimates of the reporting period. A sales allowance is recorded and accounts receivable are reduced as revenues are recognizedvariable consideration for estimated losses on credit sales due to customer claims for discounts, price discrepancies, returned goods, and other items. Revenue is also reduced for any contractual customer program arrangements and related liabilities are recorded concurrently.

We maintain customer-related accruals and allowances that consist primarily of chargebacks, rebates, sales returns, shelf stock allowances, administrative fees, and other incentive programs. Some of these adjustments relate specifically to the RX segment while others relate to the CHCA and CHCI segments. The aggregate gross-to-net adjustments related to RX products can exceed 50% of the segment's gross sales. In contrast, the aggregate gross-to-net adjustments related to CHCA and CHCI typically do not exceed 10% of the segment's gross sales. Certain of thesewhich accruals and allowances are established. Variable consideration for product sales consists primarily of rebates and other incentive programs recorded on the balance sheetConsolidated Balance Sheets as current liabilities, and others are recorded asAccrued customer programs. Where appropriate, these estimates take into consideration a reduction in accounts receivable.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Critical Accounting Estimates


Chargebacks

We market and sell products directly to wholesalers, distributors, warehousing pharmacy chains, and other direct purchasing groups. We also market products indirectly to independent pharmacies, non-warehousing chains, managed care organizations, and group purchasing organizations, collectively referred to as ("indirect customers"). In addition, we enter into agreements with some indirect customers to establish contract pricing for certain products. These indirect customers then independently select a wholesaler from which to purchase the products at these contracted prices. Alternatively, we may pre-authorize wholesalers to offer specified contract pricing to other indirect customers. Under either arrangement, we provide chargeback credit to the wholesaler for any difference between the contracted price with the indirect customer and the wholesaler's invoice price. The accrual for chargebacks is based on historical chargeback experience and confirmed wholesaler inventory levels, as well as estimated sell-through levels by wholesalers to retailers. We regularly assess current pricing dynamics and wholesaler inventory levels to ensure the liability for future chargebacks is fairly stated.

Medicaid Rebates

We participate in certain qualifying U.S. federal and state government programs whereby discounts and rebates are provided to participating government entities. Medicaid rebates are amounts owed based upon contractual agreements or legal requirements with public sector (Medicaid) benefit providers, after the final dispensingrange of the product by a pharmacy to a benefit plan participant. Medicaid reserves are based on expected payments, which are driven by patient usage, contract performance, and field inventory that will be subject to a Medicaid rebate. Medicaid rebates are typically billed up to 180 days after the product is shipped, but can be billed as many as 270 days after the quarterpossible outcomes in which the product is dispensedrelevant factors, such as historical experience, current contractual and statutory requirements, specific known market events and trends, industry data and forecasted customer buying and payment patterns, are either probability-weighted to the Medicaid participant. As a result, our Medicaid rebate provision includesderive an estimate of outstanding claims for end-customer sales that occurred but for whichexpected value or the related claim has not been billed, and an estimate for future claims that will be made when inventory inreflects the distribution channel is sold through to plan participants. Our calculation also requires other estimates, such as estimates of sales mix, to determine which sales are subject to rebates andsingle most likely outcome. Overall, these reserves reflect the amount of such rebates. Our rebates are reviewed on a monthly basis against actual claims data to ensure the liability is fairly stated.

Returns and Shelf Stock Allowances

Consistent with industry practice, we maintain a return policy that allows our customers to return product within a specified period prior to and subsequent to the expiration date. Generally, product may be returned for a period beginning six months prior to its expiration date to up to one year after its expiration date. The majority of our product returns are the result of product dating, which falls within the range set by our policy, and are settled through the issuance of a credit to the customer. Our estimate of the provision for returns is based upon our historical experience with actual returns, which is applied to the level of sales for the period that corresponds to the period during which our customers may return product. The period is based on the shelf life of the products at the time of shipment. Additionally, when establishing our reserves, we consider factors such as levels of inventory in the distribution channel, product dating and expiration period, size and maturity of the market prior to a product launch, entrance into the market of additional competition, and changes in formulations.

Shelf stock allowances are credits issued to reflect changes in the selling price of a product and are based uponbest estimates of the amount of product remaining in a customer's inventory at the time of the anticipated price change. In many cases, the customer is contractuallyconsideration to which we are entitled to such a credit. The allowances for shelf stock adjustments are based on specified terms with certain customers, estimated launch dates of competing products, and estimated changes in market price.

RX Administrative Fees and Other Rebates

Consistent with pharmaceutical industry practice, rebates or administrative fees are offered to certain wholesale customers, group purchasing organizations, and end-user customers. Settlement of rebates and fees generally may occur from one to 15 months from the date of sale. We provide a provision for rebates at the time of sale based on contracted rates and historical redemption rates. Assumptions used to establish the provision include level of wholesaler inventories, contract sales volumes, and average contract pricing.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Critical Accounting Estimates


CHCA and CHCI Rebates and Other Allowances

In the CHCA and CHCI segments, we offer certain customers a volume incentive rebate if specific levels of product purchases are made during a specified period. The accrual for rebates is based on contractual agreements and estimated levels of purchasing. In addition, we have a reserve for product returns, primarily related to damaged and unsaleable products. We also have agreements with certain customers to cover promotional activities related to our products such as coupon programs, new store allowances, and product displays. The accrual for these activities is based on customer agreements and is established at the time product revenue is recognized.

Allowances for customer-related programs are generally recorded at the time of sale based on the estimates and methodologies described above. We continually monitor product sales provisions and re-evaluate these estimates as additional information becomes available, which includes, among other things, an assessment of current market conditions, trade inventory levels, and customer product mix. We make adjustments to these provisions at the end of each reporting period to reflect any such updates to the relevant facts and circumstances.

The following table summarizes the activity in our customer-related accrual and allowance accounts on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):
Customer-Related Accruals and Allowances
 RX All Other Segments *  
 Chargebacks Medicaid
Rebates
 Returns and Shelf Stock Allowances Admin. Fees and Other Rebates Rebates and Other Allowances Total
Balance at June 27, 2015$191.4
 $31.6
 $62.1
 $45.3
 $128.8
 $459.2
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
 
 (3.2) (3.2)
Provisions / Adjustments666.3
 11.7
 21.3
 47.8
 144.3
 891.4
Credits / Payments(632.7) (18.6) (20.6) (53.1) (133.0) (858.0)
Balance at December 31, 2015$225.0
 $24.7
 $62.8
 $40.0
 $136.9
 $489.4
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
 
 (7.5) (7.5)
Provisions / Adjustments1,437.2
 27.4
 48.0
 103.4
 259.6
 1,875.6
Credits / Payments(1,445.2) (27.5) (33.7) (108.8) (258.0) (1,873.2)
Balance at December 31, 2016$217.0
 $24.6
 $77.1
 $34.6
 $131.0
 $484.3
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
 
 0.1
 0.1
Provisions / Adjustments1,564.3
 45.1
 43.7
 113.8
 281.2
 2,048.1
Credits / Payments(1,551.4) (32.9) (44.6) (105.2) (286.1) (2,020.2)
Balance at December 31, 2017$229.9
 $36.8
 $76.2
 $43.2
 $126.2
 $512.3

*Primarily CHCA and CHCI.

Revenue Recognition
Revenues from service and royalty arrangements, including revenues from collaborative agreements, consist primarily of royalty payments, payments for research and development services, up-front fees and milestone payments. If an arrangement requires the delivery or performance of multiple deliverables or service elements, we determine whether the individual elements represent "separate units of accounting". If the separate elements meet the requirements, we recognize the revenue associated with each element separately and revenue is allocated among elements based on their relative selling prices. If the elements within a multiple deliverable arrangement are not considered separate units of accounting, the delivery of an individual element is considered not to have occurred if there are undelivered elements that are considered essential to the arrangement. To the extent such arrangements contain refund clauses triggered by non-performance or other adverse circumstances, revenue is not recognized until all contractual obligations are satisfied.

Non-refundable up-front fees are deferred and amortized to revenue over the related performance period. We estimate the performance period based on the specific terms of each collaborative agreement. Revenue
Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Critical Accounting Estimates


associated with research and development services is recognized on a proportional performance basis over the period that we perform the related activities under the terms of the agreement. Revenue resultingcontract. Actual amounts of consideration ultimately received may differ from our estimates. If actual results in the future vary from the achievement of contingent milestone events stipulatedestimates, these estimates are adjusted, which would affect revenue and earnings in the agreements is recognized when the milestone is achieved. Milestones are based upon the occurrence of a substantive element specified in the contract.period such variances become known.
Inventory Reserves

We maintain reserves for estimated obsolete or unmarketable inventory based on the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated market value. In estimating the reserves, management considers factors such as excess or slow-moving inventories, product expiration dating, products on quality hold, current and future customer demand, and market conditions. Changes in these conditions may result in additional reserves.


Income Taxes


Our tax rate is subject to adjustment over the balance of the year due to, among other things, income tax rate changes by governments; the jurisdictions in which our profits are determined to be earned and taxed; changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities; adjustments to estimated taxes upon finalization of various tax returns; adjustments to our interpretation of transfer pricing standards,standards; changes in available tax credits, grants and other incentives; changes in stock-based compensation expense; changes in tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws (for example, proposals for fundamental U.S. and international tax reform);laws; changes in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; expiration of or the inability to renew tax rulings or tax holiday incentives; and the repatriation of earnings with respect to which we have not previously provided taxes. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded a net increase in valuation allowances of $35.9 million, comprised primarily of an increase of valuation allowance for deferred tax assets related to our Latin American businesses included as held for sale.


Although we believe that our tax estimates are reasonable and that we prepare our tax filings in accordance with all applicable tax laws, the final determination with respect to any tax audit, and any related litigation, could be materially different from our estimates or from our historical income tax provisions and accruals. The results of an audit or litigation could have a material effect on operating results and/or cash flows in the periods for which that determination is made. In addition, future period earnings may be adversely impacted by litigation costs, settlements, penalties, and/or interest assessments.assessments (refer to Item 8. Note 17).


74

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Critical Accounting Estimates

Legal Contingencies


We are involved in product liability, patent, commercial, regulatory and other legal proceedings that arise in the normal course of business. We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If the reasonable estimate of a probable loss is a range and no amount within that range is a better estimate, the minimum amount in the range is accrued. If a loss is not probable or a probable loss cannot be reasonably estimated, no liability is recorded. We have established reserves for certain of our legal matters (refer to Item 8. Note 1619). We alsodo not incorporate insurance recoveries into our reserves for legal contingencies. We separately record anyreceivables for amounts due under insurance policies when we consider the realization of recoveries that arefor claims to be probable, of occurring.which may be different than the timing in which we establish the loss reserves.


Acquisition Accounting


We account for acquired businesses using the acquisition method of accounting, which requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at fair value, with limited exceptions. Any excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the specifically identified net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Amounts allocated to acquired In Process Research and Development ("IPR&D") are recognized at fair value and initially characterized as indefinite-lived intangible assets, irrespective of whether the acquired IPR&D has an alternative future use. If the acquired net assets do not constitute a business, or substantially all of the fair value is in a single asset or group of similar assets, the transaction is accounted for as an asset acquisition and no goodwill is recognized. In an asset acquisition, acquired IPR&D with no alternative future use is charged to expense at the acquisition date.


The judgments made by managementSignificant judgment is required in determiningestimating the estimated fair value assignedof intangible assets and in assigning their respective useful lives. The acquired intangible assets can include customer relationships, trademarks, trade names, brands, developed product technology and IPR&D assets. For acquisitions accounted for as business combinations, IPR&D is considered to each class ofbe an indefinite-lived intangible asset acquireduntil the research is completed, at which point it then becomes a definite-lived intangible asset, or is determined to have no future use and liability assumed can materially impact our results of operations. As part of the valuation procedures, we typically consult an independent advisor.is then impaired. There are several methods that can be used to determine the fair value.value of our intangible assets. We typically use an income approach for valuing ourto value the specifically identifiable intangible assets by employing eitherwhich is based on forecasts of the expected future cash flows. We have historically used a relief from royalty or multi-period excess earnings methodology. The relief from royalty method assumes that, if the acquired company did not own the intangible asset or intellectual property, it would be willing to pay a royalty for its use. The benefit of ownership of the intellectual property is valued as the relief from the royalty
Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Critical Accounting Estimates


expense that would otherwise be incurred. Typically we use this method for valuing readily transferable intangible assets that have licensing appeal, such as trade namesfair value estimates are based on available historical information and trademarkson future expectations and certain technology assets.

The multi-period excess earnings approach starts with a forecast of the net cash flows expected to be generatedassumptions deemed reasonable by the asset over its estimated useful life. These cash flowsmanagement but are then adjusted to present value by applying an appropriate discount rate that reflects the risk factors associated with the cash flow streams.inherently uncertain. We typically use this method for valuingconsult with an independent advisor to assist in the valuation of these intangible assets such as developed product technology, customer relationships, product formulations, and IPR&D.

Some of the more significantassets. Significant estimates and assumptions inherent in one or both of these income approaches include:

the valuations include discount rates, revenue growth assumptions and expected profit margins. We consider marketplace participant assumptions in determining the amount and timing of projected future cash flows adjusted foralong with the probabilitylength of technical and marketing success;
our customer relationships, the amount and timing of projected costsattrition, product or technology life cycles, barriers to develop IPR&D into commercially viable products;
the discount rate selected to measure the risks inherent in the future cash flows;
the estimate of an appropriate market royalty rate; and
an assessment of the asset's life cycleentry and the competitive trends impactingrisk associated with the asset, including consideration of any technical, legal, regulatory, or economic barriers to entry.
We believe the fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on reasonable assumptions; however, unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that may affect the accuracy and validity of such assumptions, estimates or actual results.

cash flows in concluding upon our discount rate. While we use our best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, our estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, we may record adjustments to the assets acquiredpurchase accounting. In addition, unanticipated market or macroeconomic events and liabilities assumed withcircumstances may occur that could affect the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusionaccuracy or validity of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to our Consolidated Statements of Operations.estimates and assumptions.


Determining the useful life of an intangible asset also requires judgment, as different types of intangible assets will have different useful lives and certain assets may even be considered to have indefinite useful lives. Useful life isWith the period over whichexception of certain trademarks, trade names, and brands and IPR&D, the majority of our acquired intangible asset isassets are expected to contribute directly or indirectlyhave determinable useful lives. Our assessment as to our future cash flows. We determine the useful lives of these intangible assets is based on a number of factors such as legal, regulatory, or contractual provisions that may limit the usefulincluding competitive environment, market share, trademark, brand history, underlying product life cycles, operating plans and the effectsmacroeconomic environment of obsolescence, anticipated demand, existencethe countries in which the trademarked or absence of competition, and other economic factors onbranded products are sold. Definite-lived intangible assets are amortized to expense over their estimated useful life.

Financial Assets

We accounted for the Tysabri® royalty stream as a financial asset and elected to use the fair value option model. We made the election to account for the Tysabri® financial asset using the fair value option as we believed this method was most appropriate for an asset that did not have a par value, a stated interest stream, or a termination date. The change in estimated fair value from investments in royalty rights is presented on our Consolidated Statements of Operations under the caption, "Change in financial assets."

We were entitled to quarterly payments of royalties on Tysabri® sales. We recorded our right to royalty payments from Biogen when earned and when collection was reasonably assured. We recorded the change in fair value of the Tysabri® financial asset in our financial statements each period. Critical estimates in determining the fair value are the underlying revenue assumptions of Tysabri® sales and the discount rates. The revenue assumptions were impacted by product demand and market growth assumptions, inventory target levels, product approval and pricing assumptions. Factors that could cause a change in estimates of future cash flows include a change in estimated market size, entry of a competitive product that would erode market share, manufacturing and approval of a biosimilar equivalent product, a change in pricing strategy or reimbursement coverage, a delay in obtaining regulatory approval, a change in dosage of the product, and a change in the number of treatments.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Critical Accounting Estimates


The Tysabri® financial asset acquired in 2013 as part of the Elan acquisition represented a single unit of accounting. The fair value of the financial asset acquired was determined by using a discounted cash flow analysis related to the expected future cash flows to be generated by the royalty stream from Biogen based on the royalty percentage payments of Tysabri® sales. The financial asset is classified as a Level 3 asset within the fair value hierarchy, as our valuation utilized significant unobservable inputs, including industry analyst estimates for global Tysabri® sales, probability weighted as to the timing and amount of future cash flows along with certain discount rate assumptions. Cash flow forecasts included the estimated effect and timing of future competition, considering patents in effect for Tysabri® through 2024 and contractual rights to receive cash flows into perpetuity. The discounted cash flows are based upon the expected royalty stream forecasted into perpetuity using a 20-year discrete period with a declining rate terminal value. The pre-tax discount rate utilized was 7.72% and 7.83% at December 31, 2015, and June 27, 2015, respectively. Significant judgment is required in selecting appropriate discount rates.     At December 31, 2015, and June 27, 2015, we performed an evaluation to assess the discount rate and general market conditions potentially affecting the fair value of our Tysabri® financial asset. As of December 31, 2015, had this discount rate increased or decreased by 0.5%, the fair value of the asset would have increased by $270.0 million or decreased by $260.0 million, respectively. As of June 27, 2015, had this discount rate increased or decreased by 0.5%, the fair value of the asset would have decreased by $260.0 million or increased by $290.0 million, respectively. The estimated fair value of the asset is subject to variation should those cash flows vary significantly from those estimates. Quarterly, we assess the expected future cash flows and to the extent such payments are greater or less than initial estimates, or the timing of such payments is materially different than the original estimates, we will adjust the estimated fair value of the asset. As of December 31, 2015, if the expected royalty cash flows used in the estimation process had increased or decreased by 5.0%, the fair value of the asset would have increased by $270.0 million or decreased by $280.0 million, respectively. As of June 27, 2015, if the expected royalty cash flows used in the estimation process had increased or decreased by 5.0%, the fair value of the asset would have increased by $280.0 million or decreased by $280.0 million, respectively. In November 2016, we announced we were evaluating strategic alternatives for the Tysabri® financial asset. As of December 31, 2016, the financial asset was adjusted based on this strategic review and sale process, see discussion below for additional information on the sale.

The following table summarizes the change in our Consolidated Balance Sheet for the Tysabri® financial asset, which includes our fair value adjustment that is a Level 3 measurement under ASC 820 and is included in our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, and the six months ended December 31, 2015 (in millions):
 Year Ended Six Months Ended
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Tysabri® financial asset
     
Beginning balance$2,350.0
 $5,310.0
 $5,420.0
Royalties earned
 (351.8) (167.3)
Change in fair value
 (2,608.2) 57.3
Divestiture(2,350.0) 
 
Ending balance$
 $2,350.0
 $5,310.0

Change in Financial Assets

On March 27, 2017, we announced the completed divestment of our Tysabri® financial asset to Royalty Pharma for up to $2.85 billion, consisting of $2.2 billion in cash and up to $250.0 million and $400.0 million in milestone payments if the royalties on global net sales of Tysabri® that are received by Royalty Pharma meet specific thresholds in 2018 and 2020, respectively. As a result of this transaction, we transferred the entire financial asset to Royalty Pharma and recorded a $17.1 million gain during the three months ended April 1, 2017. We elected to account for the contingent milestone payments using the fair value option method, and these were recorded at an estimated fair value of $134.5 million as of December 31, 2017. We chose the fair value option as we believe it will help investors understand the potential future cash flows we may receive associated with the two contingent milestones.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Critical Accounting Estimates


We valued the contingent milestone payments using a modified Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model ("BSOPM"). Key inputs in the BSOPM are the estimated volatility and rate of return of royalties on global net sales of Tysabri® that are received by Royalty Pharma over time until payment of the contingent milestone payments is completed. Volatility and the estimated fair value of the milestones have a positive relationship such that higher volatility translates to a higher estimated fair value of the contingent milestone payments. In the valuation of contingent milestone payments performed, we assumed volatility of 30.0% and a rate of return of 8.07% as of December 31, 2017. We assess volatility and rate of return inputs quarterly by analyzing certain market volatility benchmarks and the risk associated with Royalty Pharma achieving the underlying projected royalties. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the fair value of the Royalty Pharma contingent milestone payments decreased $42.0 million, as a result of the decrease in the estimated projected Tysabri® revenues due to the launch of Ocrevus® late in the first quarter of 2017.

In addition, payment of the contingent milestone payments is dependent on global net sales of Tysabri®. Of the $134.5 million of estimated fair valued contingent milestone payments as of December 31, 2017, $79.7 million and $54.8 million relates to the 2018 and 2020 contingent milestone payments, respectively. If Tysabri® global net sales do not meet the prescribed threshold in 2018, we will write off the $79.7 million asset as an expense to Change in financial assets on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. If the prescribed threshold is exceeded, we will write up the asset to $250 million and recognize income of $170.3 million in Change in financial assets on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. If Tysabri® global net sales do not meet the prescribed threshold in 2020, we will write off the $54.8 million asset as an expense to Change in financial assets on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. If the prescribed threshold is exceeded, we will write up the asset to $400.0 million and recognize income of $345.2 million in Change in financial assets on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Global Tysabri® net sales need to exceed $1.9 billion and $2.0 billion in 2018 and 2020, respectively in order for Royalty Pharma to receive the level of royalties needed to trigger the milestone payments owed to us. Tysabri® net sales are anticipated to decline on a global basis in 2018, compared to 2017, due to increased competition from Ocrevus®, offset by volume growth in Tysabri® international markets (refer to Item 8. Note 6).

The table below presents a reconciliation for the Royalty Pharma contingent milestone payments measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) (in millions). Change in fair value in the table was recorded in Change in financial assets on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
 Year Ended
 December 31,
2017
Royalty Pharma Contingent Milestone Payments 
Beginning balance$
Additions184.5
Payments(8.0)
Change in fair value(42.0)
Ending balance$134.5


Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets


Goodwill represents amounts paid for an acquisition of a business in excess of the fair value of net assets received. We test goodwill for impairment annually, or more frequently if changes in circumstances or the occurrence of events suggest an impairment exists (refer to Item 8. Note 1). Effective in the year ended December 31, 2016, we changed our segment structure. We performed ourperform annual goodwill impairment testing as of October 1, 2017,on the first day of the fourth quarter. In the fourth quarter of 2021, we reorganized the reporting structure within our CSCI operating segment which resulted in the Oral Care International, CSC UK and Australia, and BCS reporting units being combined into a new CSCI reporting unit. Following the CSCI reorganization, we have two reporting units as of December 31, 2021. Impairment tests were performed for the legacy reporting units prior to the reorganization and for the CSCI reporting unit immediately after the reorganization.

The impairment test we performed for the legacy Oral Care International reporting unit prior to the reorganization discussed above resulted in a carrying value in excess of the estimated fair value by $10.0 million, therefore, we recognized an impairment. The change in fair value from previous estimates was driven by reduced
75

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Critical Accounting Estimates

projections of future cash flows resulting from increased costs throughout the global supply chain. During the year ended December 31, 2017. 2021, we also performed impairment testing related to our Latin America disposal group on its classification as held-for-sale and recorded a goodwill impairment loss of $6.1 million. We recorded goodwill impairment losses in Impairment charges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The test for impairment requires us to make several estimates aboutsignificant assumptions that impact our estimate of the fair value most of which are based on projected future cash flowsa reporting unit, including revenue growth, operating margins, and market valuation multiples. The estimates associated with the goodwill impairment testsdiscount rate. These assumptions are considered critical due to the judgments requiredsensitivity of changes in determiningthese assumptions to the related estimate of fair value amounts, including projected future cash flows that include assumptions about future performance.value. The discount rates used in testing each of our reporting units’ goodwill for impairment as ofduring our annual testing date in the fourth quarter of 2017 arewere based on the weighted average cost of capital determined for each of the Company’sour reporting units and ranged from 7.5% to 13.5%. Perpetual growth rates for each reporting unit ranged from 2.0% to 3.0%. Changes in these estimates may result in the recognition of an impairment loss.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Critical Accounting Estimates



Duringunits. In our annual goodwill testingimpairment test as of October 1, 2017, we determined the fair value of each of3, 2021, discount rates ranged from 7.75% to 9.75%, and perpetual revenue growth rates were 2.0%. In our reporting units exceeded their net book values. The fair values of the BCH, UK AUS, and Animal Health reporting units were each less than 25.0% higher than their respective net book values. As a result, these reporting units are inherently at a higher risk for future impairments if they experience deterioration in business performance or market multiples, or increases in discount rates. These reporting units had the following remaining goodwill balancesannual impairment test as of December 31, 2017:September 27, 2020, discount rates ranged from 7.25% to 9.25%, and perpetual revenue growth rates were 2.0%.

Reporting Unit Goodwill Remaining in Reporting Unit Segment Fair Value in excess of Carrying Value
BCH $1,026.0
 CHCI 6.6%
Animal Health $178.9
 CHCA 23.6%
UK AUS $53.1
 CHCI 18.3%


The discounted cash flow forecasts used for theseour reporting units in goodwill impairment testing include assumptions about future activity levels in the near term and longer-term. If growth in theseour reporting units is lower than expected, we may experience deterioration in our cash flow forecasts that may indicate goodwill in theone or more reporting units may beis impaired in future impairment tests. We continue to monitor the progress and assess the reporting units for potential impairment should impairment indicators arise, as applicable, and at least annually during our fourth quarter impairment testing.

Management performed sensitivity analyses on the discounted cash flow valuations that were prepared to estimate the enterprise values of each reporting unit. Discount rates were increased and decreased by increments of 50 basis points, up to cumulative increases and decreases of 150 basis points. Perpetual revenue growth rates were increased and decreased by increments of 50 basis points, up to cumulative increases and decreases of 100 basis points. A summary of the sensitivity analysis results is provided below for the three reporting units for which estimated fair value was less than 25.0% higher than net book value.

BCH

A 50 basis pointAn increase in the discount rate a 100 basis point decrease in the perpetual revenue growth rate, or different combinations thereof, would indicate potential impairment for this reporting unit. Based on the sensitivity of the discount rate assumption on the BCH reporting unit analysis, any increase in the discount rate over the next twelve months could negatively impact the estimated fair value of thisthe reporting unitunits and lead to a future impairment. Certain macroeconomic factors which are not controlled by the reporting unit,units, such as rising inflation or interest rates, could cause an increase in the discount rate to occur. Deterioration in BCH performance of our reporting units, such as lower than expected revenue or profitability that has a sustained impact on future periods, could also represent potential indicators of impairment requiring further analysis.  

We performed sensitivity analyses on the discounted cash flow valuations that were prepared to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit. Discount rates and perpetual revenue growth rates were increased and decreased by increments of 25 or 50 basis points. For the CSCI reporting unit, the fair value exceeds our carrying amount by less than 10%.Therefore, a 50 basis point increase in the discount rate, or a 25 basis point increase in the discount rate combined with a 25 basis point decrease in the residual growth rate, would indicate potential impairment for this reporting unit. Our sensitivities assume a corresponding decrease in market valuation multiples. Based on the sensitivity of the discount rate assumptions on these analyses, an increase in the discount rate over the next twelve months could negatively impact the estimated fair value of the reporting units and lead to a future impairment. Certain macroeconomic factors which are not controlled by the reporting units, such as rising inflation or interest rates, could cause an increase in the discount rate to occur. Deterioration in performance of our reporting units over the next twelve months, such as lower than expected revenuesrevenue or profitability that has a sustained impact on future periods, could also represent potential indicators of impairment requiring further impairment analysis.


Animal Health

A 100 basis point increase inWe continue to monitor the discount rate combined with a 100 basis point decrease in the perpetual revenue growth rate, or a 150 basis point increase in the discount rate combined with 50 basis point decrease in the perpetual revenue growth rate, would indicateprogress of our reporting units and assess them for potential impairment of this reporting unit. If the expected results for this reporting unit are not achieved, potentialshould impairment indicators of impairment may result, requiring further analysis.

During thearise, as applicable, and at least annually during our fourth quarter of 2017, the Animal Health reporting unit had an indication of potential impairment resulting from the termination of a supply agreement. We prepared an impairment test as of December 31, 2017 and determined the fair value of the Animal Health reporting unit continued to exceed net book value, by 8.9%. The 8.9% margin was lower than the excess fair value over carrying value of 23.6% that was estimated as of October 1, 2017. Therefore, while no impairment was recorded in 2017, the supply agreement termination increased the risk of future impairment in this reporting unit. Based on our estimates of fair value and the reported carrying values as of December 31, 2017, a 100 basis point increase in the discount rate, or a 100 basis point decrease in the perpetual revenue growth rate, would indicate potential impairment of this reporting unit. If the expected results for this reporting unit are not achieved, additional indicators of impairment may result, requiring further analysis.testing.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Critical Accounting Estimates



UK AUS

A 150 basis point increase in the discount rate, or a 100 basis point increase in the discount rate combined with a 100 basis point decrease in the perpetual revenue growth rate, would indicate potential impairment of this reporting unit. If the expected results for this reporting unit are not achieved, potential indicators of impairment may result, requiring further analysis.

The sensitivity analyses described above for BCH, UK AUS, and Animal Health, while a useful tool, should not be used as a sole predictor of impairment. A thorough analysis of all the facts and circumstances existing at that time would need to be performed to determine if recording an impairment loss was appropriate.

Certain trade names, trademarks, brands, as well as IPR&D assets, are determined to have an indefinite useful life and are not subject to amortization. We review them for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that any individual asset might be impaired, and adjust the carrying value of the asset as necessary. IPR&D assets are initially recognized at fair value and classified as indefinite-lived assets until the successful completion or abandonment of the associated research and development efforts. We recorded the following impairment charges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations (in millions):
 Year Ended Six Months Ended
 December 31, 2017 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Goodwill$
 $1,092.6
 $
Indefinite-lived intangible assets$
 $849.5
 $185.1
IPR&D$12.7
 $3.5
 $

As of December 31, 2017, the remaining goodwill and indefinite-lived asset balances are $4.2 billion and $90.3 million, respectively (refer to     See Item 8. Note 34 and Note 67 for additional information regarding goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment testing results and assumptions used, respectively).

Definite-Lived Intangible Assets

Definite-lived intangible assets consist of a portfolio of developed product technology/formulation and product rights, distribution and license agreements, customer relationships, non-compete agreements, and certain trademarks, trade names, and brands. The assets are amortized on either a straight-line basis or proportionately to the benefits derived from those relationships or agreements.

For intangible assets subject to amortization, an impairment analysis is performed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of any individual asset may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of an intangible asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable and its carrying amount exceeds its fair value. We recorded the following impairment charges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations (in millions):
 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 December 31,
2016
Definite-lived Intangible assets$19.7
 $665.5
To the extent we experience additional unanticipated competitive market entrants or major adverse macro-economic events, we may incur additional impairment losses (refer to Item 8. Note 3 and Note 6 for a more detailed discussion of the impaired definite-lived intangible assets and assumptions used, respectively).

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7
Critical Accounting Estimates


Guaranteed Liabilities

On November 21, 2017, we completed the sale of our Israel API business, which was previously classified as held-for-sale, to SK Capital (refer to Item 8. Note 2). As a result of the sale, we recognized a guarantee liability. Per the agreement, we will be reimbursed for tax receivables for tax years prior to closing and will need to reimburse SK Capital for the settlement of any uncertain tax liability positions for tax years prior to closing. In addition, after closing and going forward, the Israel API business, will be assessed by and liable to the Israel Tax Authority ("ITA") for any audit findings. We are no longer the primary obligor on the liabilities transferred to SK Capital on November 21, 2017, however, we have provided a guarantee on certain obligations that were recorded at a fair value of $13.8 million, with a maximum possible payout of $34.9 million.further information.
    
Recently Issued Accounting Standards Pronouncements


See Item 8. Note 1 for information regarding recently issued accounting standards.


76

Perrigo Company plc - Item 7A


ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Foreign Exchange Risk

We are a global company with operations primarily throughout North America, Europe, Australia, Mexico, and Israel.Mexico. We transact business in each location's local currency and in foreign currencies, thereby creating exposures to changes in exchange rates. Our largest exposure is the movement of the U.S. dollar relative to the euro, which has increased due to the Omega acquisition.euro. In addition, our U.S. operations continue to expand their export business, primarily in Canada, China, and Europe, and are subject to fluctuations in the respective exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar. A large portion of the sales of our Israeli operations is in foreign currencies, primarily U.S. dollars and euros, while these operations largely incur costs in their local currency. Further, a portion of Biogen's global sales of Tysabri® are denominated in local currencies creating exposures to changes in exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar and thereby impacting the amount of U.S. dollar royalties necessary to achieve our contingent payment thresholds in 2018 and 2020.


Due to different sales and cost structures, certain segments experience a negative impact and certain segments a positive impact as a result of changes in exchange rates. We estimate the translation effect of a ten percent devaluation of the U.S. dollar relative to the other foreign currencies in which we transact business would have increased operating income of our non-U.S. operating units by approximately $87.1$33.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.2021. This sensitivity analysis has inherent limitations. The analysis disregards the possibility that rates of multiple foreign currencies will not always move in the same direction relative to the value of the U.S. dollar over time and does not account for foreign exchange derivatives that we utilize to mitigate fluctuations in exchange rates.


In addition, we enter into certain purchase commitments for materials that, although denominated in U.S. dollars, are linked to foreign currency valuations. These commitments generally contain a range for which the price of materials may fluctuate over time given the value of a foreign currency.


The translation of the assets and liabilities of our non-U.S. dollar denominated operations is made using local currency exchange rates as of the end of the year. Translation adjustments are not included in determining net income but are disclosed in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("AOCI") within shareholders’ equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheets until a sale or substantially complete liquidation of the net investment in the subsidiary takes place. In certain markets, we could recognize a significant gain or loss related to unrealized cumulative translation adjustments if we were to exit the market and liquidate our net investment. As of December 31, 2017,2021, cumulative net currency translation adjustments decreasedincreased shareholders’ equity by $260.6$67.4 million.
    
We are also subject to currency exchange risk related to the euro-denominated purchase price for our planned acquisition of HRA Pharma for €1.8 billion. In September 2021, we entered into two non-designated currency option contracts to hedge the foreign currency exposure of the euro-denominated purchase price for HRA Pharma for a total notional value of $1.1 billion that will mature in the third quarter of 2022.

We monitor and strive to manage risk related to foreign currency exchange rates. Exposures that cannot be
naturally offset within a local entity to an immaterial amount are often hedged with foreign exchange derivatives or netted with offsetting exposures at other entities (refer to Item 8. Note 8 for further information regarding our derivative and hedging activities).entities. We cannot predict future changes in foreign currency movements and fluctuations that could materially impact earnings.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 7A




Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of interest income earned on our investment of cash on hand and interest expense on borrowings used to finance acquisitions and other general corporate purposes.

borrowings. We have in the past, and may in the future, enter into certain derivative financial instruments related to the management of interest rate risk, when available on a cost-effective basis (refer to Item 8. Note 8 for further information regarding our derivative and hedging activities).basis. These instruments are managed on a consolidated basis to efficiently net exposures and thus take advantage of any natural offsets. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. Gains and losses on hedging transactions are offset by gains and losses on the underlying exposures being hedged. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.
Inflation Risk
Inflationary factors such as increases in the cost of our products and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results. A high rate of inflation in the future may have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain current levels of gross margin and selling and administration expenses if the selling prices of our products do not increase with these increased costs.
Refer to Item 8. Note 11 and Note 1 for further information regarding our derivative instruments and hedging activities.

77

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8





ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

78


Perrigo Company plc - Item 8





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Perrigo Company plc


Opinion on the Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Perrigo Company plc (the Company) as of December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 2015,2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the period from June 28, 2015 to December 31, 2015, and the fiscal year ended June 27, 2015,2021, and the related notes and the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the period from June 28, 2015 to December 31, 2015, and the fiscal year ended June 27, 2015,2021, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated March 1, 20182022 expressed an adverseunqualified opinion thereon.


Basis for Opinion


These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Valuation of Goodwill
Description of the MatterAt December 31, 2021, the Company’s goodwill was $2,999.4 million. As discussed in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements, goodwill is not amortized but rather is tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level. The Company’s goodwill is initially assigned to its reporting units as of the acquisition date.

Auditing management’s goodwill impairment tests was complex and highly judgmental due to the significant measurement uncertainty in determining the fair value of the reporting units. In particular, the fair value estimates were sensitive to significant assumptions such as revenue growth, operating margins, and discount rate, which are affected by expected future market or economic conditions.
79

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8


How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit













We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s goodwill impairment assessment process. For example, we tested controls over the Company’s forecast process as well as controls over management’s review of the significant assumptions discussed above in estimating the fair values of the reporting units.

To test the fair value of the Company’s reporting units, our audit procedures included, among others, assessing methodologies used and testing the significant assumptions discussed above as well as the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used by the Company. For example, we compared the significant assumptions used by management to current industry and economic trends, changes in the Company’s business model, customer base or product mix and other relevant factors. We performed sensitivity analyses of the significant assumptions to evaluate the change in the fair value of the reporting unit resulting from changes in the assumptions. We also reviewed the reconciliation of the fair value of the reporting units to the market capitalization of the Company and evaluated the implied control premium. We also assessed the historical accuracy of the significant assumptions used by management to determine the fair value of its reporting units. The evaluation of the Company’s methodology and significant assumptions was performed with the assistance of our valuation specialists.
Uncertain Tax Positions
Description of the MatterAs described in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company operates in multiple jurisdictions with complex tax policy and regulatory environments and establishes reserves for uncertain tax positions in accordance with the accounting guidance governing uncertainty in income taxes. Uncertainty in a tax position may arise because tax laws are subject to interpretation. The Company uses significant judgment to (1) determine whether, based on the technical merits, a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained and (2) measure the amount of tax benefit that qualifies for recognition. At December 31, 2021, the Company had liabilities of $347.2 million, excluding interest and penalties, relating to uncertain tax positions.

Auditing the measurement of the Company’s uncertain tax positions was challenging because the evaluation of whether a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained and the measurement of the benefit of various tax positions can be complex, involves significant judgment, and is based on interpretations of tax laws and legal rulings.
80

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8


How We Addressed the Matter in Our AuditWe obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s accounting process for uncertain tax positions. For example, we tested controls over management’s identification of uncertain tax positions and its application of the recognition and measurement principles for uncertain tax positions.

Our audit procedures included, among others, assessing the Company’s correspondence with the relevant tax authorities and evaluating income tax opinions or other third-party advice obtained by the Company. To test the Company’s assessment and measurement of uncertain tax positions, we involved our tax professionals to assess whether the uncertain tax positions identified by the Company are more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit and, if so, to assist in testing the assumptions made by the Company in measuring the amount of tax benefit that qualifies for recognition. We also used our knowledge of, and experience with, the application of domestic and international income tax laws by the relevant income tax authorities to evaluate the Company’s assessments of whether the uncertain tax position is more-likely-than-not to be sustained and, if so, the potential outcomes that could occur upon an audit by a taxing authority. We tested the completeness and accuracy of the data and calculations used to determine the amount of tax benefit to recognize. We also evaluated the adequacy of the Company’s disclosures to the consolidated financial statements in relation to these matters.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2008.


Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 1, 20182022

81

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8







PERRIGO COMPANY PLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in millions, except per share amounts)
 Year Ended
 December 31, 2021December 31, 2020December 31,
2019
Net sales$4,138.7 $4,088.2 $3,869.9 
Cost of sales2,722.5 2,593.3 2,436.2 
Gross profit1,416.2 1,494.9 1,433.7 
Operating expenses
Distribution93.0 85.1 82.0 
Research and development122.0 121.7 119.2 
Selling536.4 545.5 538.7 
Administration482.0 478.5 476.5 
Impairment charges173.1 — 13.8 
Restructuring16.9 3.2 25.9 
Other operating expense (income)(417.6)(4.3)2.9 
Total operating expenses1,005.8 1,229.7 1,259.0 
Operating income410.4 265.2 174.7 
Change in financial assets— 95.3 (22.1)
Interest expense, net125.0 127.7 117.5 
Other (income) expense, net26.7 16.3 (68.9)
Loss on extinguishment of debt— 20.0 0.2 
Income from continuing operations before income taxes258.7 5.9 148.0 
Income tax expense (benefit)389.6 (38.3)(10.7)
Income (loss) from continuing operations(130.9)44.2 158.7 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax62.0 (206.8)(12.6)
Net income (loss)$(68.9)$(162.6)$146.1 
Earnings (loss) per share
Basic
Continuing operations$(0.98)$0.32 $1.16 
Discontinued operations$0.46 $(1.52)$(0.09)
Basic earnings per share$(0.52)$(1.20)$1.07 
Diluted
Continuing operations$(0.98)$0.32 $1.16 
Discontinued operations$0.46 $(1.51)$(0.09)
Diluted earnings per share$(0.52)$(1.19)$1.07 
Weighted-average shares outstanding
Basic133.6 136.1 136.0 
Diluted133.6 137.2 136.5 
 Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
Net sales$4,946.2
 $5,280.6
 $2,632.2
 $4,227.1
Cost of sales2,966.7
 3,228.8
 1,553.3
 2,582.9
Gross profit1,979.5
 2,051.8
 1,078.9
 1,644.2
        
Operating expenses       
Distribution87.0
 88.3
 47.9
 67.7
Research and development167.7
 184.0
 88.2
 187.8
Selling598.4
 665.0
 325.9
 319.0
Administration461.1
 452.2
 306.8
 385.3
Impairment charges47.5
 2,631.0
 215.6
 6.8
Restructuring61.0
 31.0
 26.9
 5.1
Other operating income(41.4) 
 
 
Total operating expenses1,381.3
 4,051.5
 1,011.3
 971.7
        
Operating income (loss)598.2
 (1,999.7) 67.6
 672.5
        
Change in financial assets24.9
 2,608.2
 (57.3) (78.5)
Interest expense, net168.1
 216.6
 89.9
 146.0
Other expense (Income), net(10.1) 22.7
 25.2
 334.2
Loss on extinguishment of debt135.2
 1.1
 0.9
 10.5
Income (loss) before income taxes280.1
 (4,848.3) 8.9
 260.3
Income tax expense (benefit)160.5
 (835.5) (33.6) 124.2
Net income (loss)$119.6
 $(4,012.8) $42.5
 $136.1
        
Earnings (loss) per share       
Basic$0.84
 $(28.01) $0.29
 $0.97
Diluted$0.84
 $(28.01) $0.29
 $0.97
        
Weighted-average shares outstanding       
Basic142.3
 143.3
 145.6
 139.3
Diluted142.6
 143.3
 146.1
 139.8
        
Dividends declared per share$0.64
 $0.58
 $0.25
 $0.46




See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
82




PERRIGO COMPANY PLC
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except per share amounts)
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents$1,864.9 $631.5 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for credit losses of $7.2 and $6.5, respectively652.9 593.5 
Inventories1,020.2 1,059.4 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets305.8 182.2 
Current assets held for sale16.1 666.9 
Total current assets3,859.9 3,133.5 
Property, plant and equipment, net864.1 864.6 
Operating lease assets166.9 154.7 
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets3,004.7 3,102.7 
Definite-lived intangible assets, net2,146.1 2,481.5 
Deferred income taxes6.5 40.6 
Non-current assets held for sale— 1,364.0 
Other non-current assets377.5 346.8 
Total non-current assets6,565.8 8,354.9 
Total assets$10,425.7 $11,488.4 
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Accounts payable$411.2 $451.6 
Payroll and related taxes118.5 152.9 
Accrued customer programs125.6 128.5 
Other accrued liabilities279.4 183.1 
Accrued income taxes16.5 9.0 
Current indebtedness603.8 37.3 
Current liabilities held for sale32.9 419.6 
Total current liabilities1,587.9 1,382.0 
Long-term debt, less current portion2,916.7 3,527.6 
Deferred income taxes239.3 276.2 
Non-current liabilities held for sale— 108.3 
Other non-current liabilities530.1 539.2 
Total non-current liabilities3,686.1 4,451.3 
Total liabilities5,274.0 5,833.3 
Commitments and contingencies - Refer to Note 1900
Shareholders’ equity
Controlling interests:
Preferred shares, $0.0001 par value per share, 10 shares authorized— — 
Ordinary shares, €0.001 par value per share, 10,000 shares authorized7,043.2 7,118.2 
Accumulated other comprehensive income35.5 395.0 
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)(1,927.0)(1,858.1)
Total shareholders’ equity5,151.7 5,655.1 
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$10,425.7 $11,488.4 
Supplemental Disclosures of Balance Sheet Information
Preferred shares, issued and outstanding— — 
Ordinary shares, issued and outstanding133.8 133.1 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

83

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8





PERRIGO COMPANY PLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in millions)

Year Ended
December 31, 2021December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Net income (loss)$(68.9)$(162.6)$146.1 
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustments(339.9)274.4 28.4 
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments(21.3)(13.4)28.2 
Change in post-retirement and pension liability1.7 (5.4)(1.8)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax(359.5)255.6 54.8 
Comprehensive income (loss)$(428.4)$93.0 $200.9 
 Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
        
Net income (loss)$119.6
 $(4,012.8) $42.5
 $136.1
Other comprehensive income:       
Foreign currency translation adjustments328.5
 (63.3) (135.5) (33.5)
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments(1)
9.7
 (5.3) 2.1
 (0.2)
Change in fair value of investment securities(2)
(14.1) 8.7
 9.3
 (5.3)
Change in post-retirement and pension liability(3)
10.8
 (6.6) 5.3
 2.9
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax334.9
 (66.5) (118.8) (36.1)
Comprehensive income (loss)$454.5
 $(4,079.3) $(76.3) $100.0
(1)
Includes tax effect of $3.5 million, $2.1 million, $0.4 million and $5.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016, the six months ended December 31, 2015, and the year ended June 27, 2015, respectively.
(2)
Includes tax effect of $0.5 million, $4.1 million, $3.6 million and $2.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016, the six months ended December 31, 2015, and the year ended June 27, 2015, respectively.
(3)
Includes tax effect of $0.0 million, $2.5 million, $2.8 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016, the six months ended December 31, 2015, and the year ended June 27, 2015, respectively.


See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


84

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8





PERRIGO COMPANY PLC
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except per share amounts)
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Assets     
Cash and cash equivalents$678.7
 $622.3
 $417.8
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $6.2, $6.3 and $4.5, respectively1,130.8
 1,176.0
 1,189.0
Inventories806.9
 795.0
 898.7
Prepaid expenses and other current assets203.2
 212.0
 286.1
Total current assets2,819.6
 2,805.3
 2,791.6
Property, plant and equipment, net833.1
 870.1
 886.2
Financial assets
 2,350.0
 5,310.0
Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets4,265.7
 4,163.9
 7,069.0
Other intangible assets, net3,290.5
 3,396.8
 2,973.1
Non-current deferred income taxes10.4
 72.1
 71.4
Other non-current assets409.5
 211.9
 248.3
Total non-current assets8,809.2
 11,064.8
 16,558.0
Total assets$11,628.8
 $13,870.1
 $19,349.6
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity     
Accounts payable$450.2
 $471.7
 $555.8
Payroll and related taxes148.8
 115.8
 125.3
Accrued customer programs419.7
 380.3
 396.0
Accrued liabilities230.8
 263.3
 351.9
Accrued income taxes116.1
 32.4
 62.7
Current indebtedness70.4
 572.8
 1,060.5
Total current liabilities1,436.0
 1,836.3
 2,552.2
Long-term debt, less current portion3,270.8
 5,224.5
 4,971.6
Non-current deferred income taxes321.9
 389.9
 1,372.7
Other non-current liabilities429.5
 461.8
 346.3
Total non-current liabilities4,022.2
 6,076.2
 6,690.6
Total liabilities5,458.2
 7,912.5
 9,242.8
Commitments and contingencies - Note 16
 
 
Shareholders’ equity     
Controlling interest:     
Preferred shares, $0.0001 par value per share, 10 shares authorized
 
 
Ordinary shares, €0.001 par value per share, 10,000 shares authorized7,892.9
 8,135.0
 8,142.6
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)253.1
 (81.8) (15.3)
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)(1,975.5) (2,095.1) 1,980.1
Total controlling interest6,170.5
 5,958.1
 10,107.4
Noncontrolling interest0.1
 (0.5) (0.6)
Total shareholders’ equity6,170.6
 5,957.6
 10,106.8
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$11,628.8
 $13,870.1
 $19,349.6
      
Supplemental Disclosures of Balance Sheet Information     
Preferred shares, issued and outstanding
 
 
Ordinary shares, issued and outstanding140.8
 143.4
 143.1

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8



PERRIGO COMPANY PLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
 Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016

December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
Cash Flows From (For) Operating Activities
  

 
Net income (loss)$119.6
 $(4,012.8)
$42.5
 $136.1
Adjustments to derive cash flows
  
  
Depreciation and amortization444.8
 457.0

182.4
 258.7
Loss on acquisition-related foreign currency derivatives
 
 
 326.4
Share-based compensation43.8
 23.0

22.8
 31.6
Impairment charges47.5
 2,631.0
 215.6
 6.8
Change in financial assets24.9
 2,608.2
 (57.3) (78.5)
Loss on extinguishment of debt135.2
 1.1

0.9
 10.5
Restructuring charges61.0
 31.0

26.9
 5.1
Deferred income taxes(48.9) (990.9)
(120.0) (16.3)
Amortization of debt premium(22.4) (24.7) (10.2) 0.2
Other non-cash adjustments, net(2.7) 33.5
 18.1
 10.2
Subtotal802.8
 756.4

321.7
 690.8
Increase (decrease) in cash due to:
  

 
Accounts receivable3.2
 (0.6)
52.5
 (51.1)
Inventories(16.0) 100.7

(29.6) (11.4)
Accounts payable(39.6) (75.7)
(194.1) 120.5
Payroll and related taxes(27.4) (41.1)
(38.2) (30.2)
Accrued customer programs34.6
 (13.9)
34.4
 71.3
Accrued liabilities(47.8) (79.5)
108.1
 42.8
Accrued income taxes(6.1) 20.9

(56.8) 21.9
Other, net(4.8) (12.3)
2.9
 0.6
Subtotal(103.9) (101.5)
(120.8) 164.4
Net cash from operating activities698.9
 654.9

200.9
 855.2
Cash Flows From (For) Investing Activities
  

 
Proceeds from royalty rights87.3
 353.7
 166.3
 344.6
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired(0.4) (427.4)
(791.6) (2,177.8)
Asset acquisitions
 (65.1) 
 (4.0)
Settlement of acquisition-related foreign currency derivatives
 
 (1.3) (329.9)
Proceeds from sale of securities
 4.5


 
Additions to property, plant and equipment(88.6) (106.2)
(77.8) (137.0)
Net proceeds from sale of business and other assets154.6
 69.1


 
Proceeds from sale of the Tysabri® financial asset
2,200.0
 
 
 
Other investing, net(14.8) (3.6) (3.7) 1.8
Net cash from (for) investing activities2,338.1
 (175.0)
(708.1) (2,302.3)
Cash Flows From (For) Financing Activities
  

 
Borrowings (repayments) of revolving credit agreements and other financing, net6.8
 (802.5)
718.0
 (54.0)
Issuances of long-term debt
 1,190.3


 2,504.3
Payments on long-term debt(2,611.0) (559.2)
(28.3) (1,823.5)
Premium on early debt retirement(116.1) (0.6)

 
Deferred financing fees(4.8) (2.8)
(0.3) (28.1)
Issuance of ordinary shares0.7
 8.3

4.9
 1,043.5
Equity issuance costs
 (10.3)

 (35.7)
Repurchase of ordinary shares(191.5) 
 (500.0) 
Cash dividends(91.1) (83.2)
(36.3) (64.8)
Other financing, net2.3
 (8.7) (8.4) (19.3)
Net cash from (for) financing activities(3,004.7) (268.7)
149.6
 1,522.4
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents24.1
 (6.7)
(10.2) (89.2)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents56.4
 204.5

(367.8) (13.9)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period622.3
 417.8

785.6
 799.5
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$678.7
 $622.3

$417.8
 $785.6
        

 Year Ended
 December 31,
2021
December 31, 2020December 31,
2019
Cash Flows From (For) Operating Activities
Net income (loss)$(68.9)$(162.6)$146.1 
Adjustments to derive cash flows:
Depreciation and amortization312.2 384.8 396.5 
Loss (Gain) on sale of business(47.5)20.9 (71.7)
Share-based compensation60.1 58.5 52.2 
Impairment charges173.1 346.8 184.5 
Change in financial assets— 96.4 (22.1)
Loss on extinguishment of debt— 20.0 0.2 
Restructuring charges16.9 3.5 26.3 
Deferred income taxes9.4 (54.5)(43.9)
Amortization of debt premium(3.8)(2.4)(4.4)
Other non-cash adjustments, net0.2 (6.0)37.6 
Subtotal451.7 705.4 701.3 
Increase (decrease) in cash due to:
Accounts receivable(159.7)168.9 (140.7)
Inventories(2.4)(170.6)(67.0)
Accounts payable(7.9)(2.7)17.0 
Payroll and related taxes(53.0)10.8 (3.7)
Accrued customer programs1.4 (43.3)(48.6)
Accrued liabilities(21.4)(23.1)(23.2)
Accrued income taxes(47.7)(7.0)(74.5)
Other, net(4.7)(2.2)27.2 
Subtotal(295.4)(69.2)(313.5)
Net cash from (for) operating activities156.3 636.2 387.8 
Cash Flows From (For) Investing Activities
Proceeds from royalty rights3.8 4.1 2.9 
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired— (168.5)(747.7)
Asset acquisitions(70.6)(35.2)(149.1)
Purchase of equity method investment— (15.0)— 
Proceeds from the Royalty Pharma contingent milestone— — 250.0 
Additions to property, plant and equipment(152.1)(170.4)(137.7)
Net proceeds from sale of businesses1,491.9 187.8 182.5 
Other investing, net2.8 9.4 3.0 
Net cash from (for) investing activities1,275.8 (187.8)(596.1)
Cash Flows From (For) Financing Activities
Borrowings (repayments) of revolving credit agreements and other financing, net(30.6)(3.9)0.5 
Issuances of long-term debt— 743.8 600.0 
Payments on long-term debt— (590.0)(476.0)
Premiums on early debt retirement— (19.0)— 
Deferred financing fees— (6.7)(1.0)
Issuance of ordinary shares— — 0.9 
Repurchase of ordinary shares— (164.2)— 
Cash dividends(129.6)(123.9)(112.4)
Other financing, net(18.5)(17.2)(10.2)
Net cash from (for) financing activities(178.7)(181.1)1.8 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(15.6)19.9 9.7 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents1,237.8 287.2 (196.8)
Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations, beginning of period631.5 344.5 541.9 
Cash and cash equivalents held for sale, beginning of period10.0 9.8 9.2 
Less cash and cash equivalents held for sale, end of period(14.4)(10.0)(9.8)
Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations, end of period$1,864.9 $631.5 $344.5 
85

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8





Year Ended Six Months Ended Year EndedYear Ended
December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information       Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid/received during the year for:       Cash paid/received during the year for:
Interest paid$187.6
 $205.1
 $84.2
 $143.2
Interest paid$133.0 $145.8 $136.8 
Interest received$9.3
 $1.2
 $0.7
 $1.1
Interest received$8.0 $12.1 $15.1 
Income taxes paid$186.9
 $139.5
 $87.8
 $131.0
Income taxes paid$448.0 $81.2 $136.2 
Income taxes refunded$3.6
 $9.3
 $1.7
 $9.6
Income taxes refunded$17.1 $38.3 $28.0 
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
86

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8





PERRIGO COMPANY PLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in millions, except per share amounts)
 Ordinary Shares
Issued
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated Deficit)
Total
 SharesAmount
Balance at December 31, 2018135.9 $7,421.7 $84.6 $(1,838.3)$5,668.0 
Adoption of new accounting standards— — — (3.3)(3.3)
Net income— — — 146.1 146.1 
Other comprehensive loss— — 54.8 — 54.8 
Issuance of ordinary shares under:
Stock options— 0.9 — — 0.9 
Restricted stock plan0.3 — — — — 
Compensation for stock options— 4.7 — — 4.7 
Compensation for restricted stock— 50.6 — — 50.6 
Cash dividends, $0.82 per share— (112.4)— — (112.4)
Shares withheld for payment of employees'
   withholding tax liability
(0.1)(5.6)— — (5.6)
Balance at December 31, 2019136.1 7,359.9 139.4 (1,695.5)5,803.8 
Net income— — — (162.6)(162.6)
Other comprehensive income— — 255.6 — 255.6 
Issuance of ordinary shares under:
Restricted stock plan0.6 — — — — 
Compensation for stock options— 2.0 — — 2.0 
Compensation for restricted stock— 56.5 — — 56.5 
Cash dividends, $0.90 per share— (123.9)— — (123.9)
Shares withheld for payment of employees'
   withholding tax liability
(0.2)(10.7)— — (10.7)
Repurchases of ordinary shares(3.4)(164.2)— — (164.2)
Purchase of subsidiary's minority interest— (1.4)— — (1.4)
Balance at December 31, 2020133.1 7,118.2 395.0 (1,858.1)5,655.1 
Net loss— — — (68.9)(68.9)
Other comprehensive income— — (359.5)— (359.5)
Issuance of ordinary shares under:
Restricted stock plan1.0 — — — — 
Compensation for stock options— 0.9 — — 0.9 
Compensation for restricted stock— 66.9 — — 66.9 
Cash dividends, $0.96 per share— (129.6)— — (129.6)
Shares withheld for payment of employees'
   withholding tax liability
(0.3)(13.2)— — (13.2)
Balance at December 31, 2021133.8 $7,043.2 $35.5 $(1,927.0)$5,151.7 
 Ordinary Shares
Issued
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated Deficit)
 Total
 Shares Amount  
Balance at June 28, 2014133.8
 $6,678.2
 $139.6
 $1,902.6
 $8,720.4
       

  
Net income
 
 
 136.1
 136.1
Other comprehensive loss
 
 (36.1) 
 (36.1)
Issuance of ordinary shares under:         
Equity offering6.8
 1,035.0
 
 
 1,035.0
Omega acquisition5.4
 904.9
 
 
 904.9
Stock options0.2
 8.5
 
 
 8.5
Restricted stock plan0.2
 
 
 
 
Compensation for stock options
 6.9
 
 
 6.9
Compensation for restricted stock
 24.7
 
 
 24.7
Cash dividends, $0.46 per share
 
 
 (64.8) (64.8)
Tax effect from stock transactions
 7.0
 
 
 7.0
Shares withheld for payment of employee's withholding tax liability(0.1) (7.6) 
 
 (7.6)
Equity issuance costs
 (35.7) 
 
 (35.7)
Balance at June 27, 2015146.3
 8,621.9
 103.5
 1,973.9
 10,699.3



 

     

Net income
 
 
 42.5
 42.5
Other comprehensive loss
 
 (118.8) 
 (118.8)
Issuance of ordinary shares under:         
Stock options0.1
 4.9
 
 
 4.9
Restricted stock plan0.1
 
 
 
 
Compensation for stock options
 2.5
 
 
 2.5
Compensation for restricted stock
 20.3
 
 
 20.3
Cash dividends, $0.25 per share
 
 
 (36.3) (36.3)
Tax effect from stock transactions
 3.3
 
 
 3.3
Shares withheld for payment of employee's withholding tax liability(0.1) (10.3) 
 
 (10.3)
Repurchases of ordinary shares(3.3)
(500.0)




(500.0)
Balance at December 31, 2015143.1
 8,142.6
 (15.3) 1,980.1
 10,107.4
          
Net loss
 
 
 (4,012.8) (4,012.8)
Other comprehensive loss
 
 (66.5) 
 (66.5)
Issuance of ordinary shares under:         
Stock options0.2
 8.3
 
 
 8.3
Restricted stock plan0.2
 
 
 
 
Compensation for stock options
 5.0
 
 
 5.0
Compensation for restricted stock
 18.0
 
 
 18.0
Cash dividends, $0.58 per share
 (20.8) 
 (62.4) (83.2)
Tax effect from stock transactions
 (1.5) 
 
 (1.5)
Shares withheld for payment of employee's
withholding tax liability
(0.1) (6.3) 
 
 (6.3)
Equity issuance costs
 (10.3) 
 
 (10.3)
Balance at December 31, 2016143.4
 8,135.0
 (81.8) (2,095.1) 5,958.1
          
Net income
 
 
 119.6
 119.6
Other comprehensive income
 
 334.9
 
 334.9
Stock options0.1
 0.7
 
 
 0.7
Restricted stock plan0.1
 
 
 
 
Compensation for stock options
 8.9
 
 
 8.9
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8



 Ordinary Shares
Issued
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated Deficit)
 Total
 Shares Amount  
Compensation for restricted stock
 34.9
 
 
 34.9
Cash dividends, $0.64 per share
 (91.1) 
 
 (91.1)
Shares withheld for payment of employee's
withholding tax liability
(0.1) (4.0) 
 
 (4.0)
Repurchases of ordinary shares(2.7) (191.5) 
 
 (191.5)
Balance at December 31, 2017140.8
 $7,892.9
 $253.1
 $(1,975.5) $6,170.5


See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
87

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1









NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


General Information


The Company


Perrigo Company plc was incorporated under the laws of Ireland on June 28, 2013 and became the successor registrant of Perrigo Company, a Michigan corporation, on December 18, 2013 in connection with the acquisition of Elan Corporation, plc ("Elan"). Unless the context requires otherwise, the terms "Perrigo," the "Company," "we," "our," "us," and similar pronouns used herein refer to Perrigo Company plc, its subsidiaries, and all predecessors of Perrigo Company plc and its subsidiaries.


We are a leading global healthcare company, delivering value to our customers and consumersOur vision is to make lives better by providingbringing Quality, Affordable HealthcareSelf-Care Products®. Founded in 1887 as a packager of home remedies, we have built a unique business model that is best described as the convergence of a fast-moving consumer goods company, a high-quality pharmaceutical manufacturing organization and a world-class supply chain network. We believe weconsumers trust everywhere they are one of the world's largest manufacturers of over-the-counter (“OTC”) healthcare products and suppliers of infant formulas for the store brand market.sold. We are a leading provider of branded OTC products throughout Europe,over-the-counter ("OTC") health and also a leading producer of generic pharmaceutical topical products such as creams, lotions,wellness solutions that are designed to enhance individual well-being and gels, as well as nasal sprays and injection ("extended topical") prescription drugs. We are headquartered in Ireland, and sell our products primarily in North America and Europe, as well as in other markets, including Australia, Israel and China.empower consumers to proactively prevent or treat conditions that can be self-managed.


Basis of Presentation


Our fiscal year previously consisted of a 52- or 53-week year ending on or around June 30 of each year with each quarter ending on the Saturday closest to each calendar quarter end. Beginning on January 1, 2016, we changed our fiscal year to beginbegins on January 1 and endends on December 31 of each year. As a result of our change in yearWe end this report on Form 10-K discloses the results of our operations for:

The twelve-month period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017;
The twelve-month period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016;
The six-month period from June 28, 2015 through December 31, 2015;
The twelve-month period from June 29, 2014 to June 27, 2015; and
The six-month period from June 29, 2014 through December 27, 2014.

We cut off our quarterly accounting periods on the Saturday closest to the end of the calendar quarter, with the fourth quarter ending on December 31 of each year.


Segment Reporting


Our reporting and operating segments are as follows:


Consumer HealthcareSelf-Care Americas("CHCA" ("CSCA"),comprises our consumer self-care business (OTC, infant formula, and Oral care categories, our divested Animal health category, and contract manufacturing) in the U.S., Mexico and Canada consumer healthcare business (OTC, contract, infant formula and animal health categories).
Canada.
Consumer HealthcareSelf-Care International ("CHCI"CSCI"),comprises our branded consumer healthcareself-care business primarily branded in Europe and Australia, and our consumer focused businessesstore brand business in the U.K., Australia,United Kingdom and Israel. This segment also includes our U.K.parts of Europe and Asia. Our liquid licensed products business.
business in the United Kingdom was included in this segment until it was divested on June 19, 2020.

Prescription Pharmaceuticals("We previously had an RX"),comprises segment which was comprised of our prescription pharmaceuticals business in the U.S. Prescription Pharmaceuticals business.

We also had two legacy operating segments, Specialty Sciences, and Other,other pharmaceuticals and diagnostic business in Israel, which contained our Tysabri® financial asset and Active Pharmaceuticals business ("API") businesses, respectively, which we divested (refer to Note 2 and Note 6).have been divested. Following these divestitures,the divestiture, there were no substantial assets or operations left in either of these segments. Effective January 1, 2017,this segment. The RX segment was reported as Discontinued Operations in 2021, and is presented as such for all expenses associated with our former Specialty Sciences segmentperiods in this report (refer to Note 8).
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1




were moved to unallocated expenses. Our segments reflect the way in which our management makes operating decisions, allocates resources and manages the growth and profitability of the Company. Financial information related to our business segments and geographic locations can be found in Note 2 and Note 21.

Principles of Consolidation


The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and accounts of all majority-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.


Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities
    
We have research and development ("R&D") arrangements with certain biotechnology companies that we determined to be variable interest entities ("VIEs"). We did not consolidate the VIEs in our financial statements because we lack the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance and thus are not considered the primary beneficiaries of these entities. These arrangements provide us with certain rights and obligations to purchase product candidates from the VIEs, dependent upon the outcome of the development activities.


88

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1



Use of Estimates


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions, which affect the reported earnings, financial position and various disclosures. Although the estimates are considered reasonable, actual results could differ from the estimates.


Non-U.S. Operations


We translate our non-U.S. dollar-denominated operations’ assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies into U.S. dollars at current rates of exchange as of the balance sheet date and income and expense items at the average exchange rate for the reporting period. Translation adjustments resulting from exchange rate fluctuations are recorded in the cumulative translation account, a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Incomeother comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI"). Gains or losses from foreign currency transactions are included in Other (income) expense, net.


RevenuesRevenue


Product Revenue

We generally record revenues fromrecognize product sales when the goods are shippedrevenue for our contract performance obligations at a point in time, typically upon shipment or delivery of products to customers. For point in time customers for which control transfers on delivery to the customer. For customers with Freecustomer due to free on Boardboard destination terms a provision(“FOB”), an adjustment is recorded to exclude shipments estimated to be in-transit to these customersdefer revenue recognition over an estimate of days until control transfers at the endpoint of delivery. Where we recognize revenue at a point in time, the transfer of title is the primary indicator that control has transferred. In other limited instances, primarily relating to those contracts that relate to contract manufacturing performed for our customers and certain store branded products, control transfers as the product is manufactured. Control is deemed to transfer over time for these contracts as the product does not have an alternative use and we have a contractual right to payment for performance completed to date. Revenue for contract manufacturing contracts is recognized over the transfer period using an input method that measures progress towards completion of the reporting period. Aperformance obligation as costs are incurred. For store branded product revenue recognized over time, an output method is used to recognize revenue when production of a unit is completed because product customization occurs when the product is packaged as a finished good under the store brand label of the customer.

Net product sales allowance is recorded and accounts receivable are reduced as revenues are recognizedinclude estimates of variable consideration for estimated losses on credit sales due to customer claims for discounts, price discrepancies, returned goods and other items. Revenue is also reduced for any contractual customer program arrangements and related liabilities are recorded concurrently.

We maintain customer-related accruals and allowances that consist primarily of chargebacks, rebates, sales returns, shelf stock allowances, administrative fees and other incentive programs. Some of these adjustments relate specifically to the RX segment while others relate only to the CHCA and CHCI segments. Certain of thesewhich accruals and allowances are established. Variable consideration for product sales consists primarily of rebates and other incentive programs recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Accrued customer programs. Where appropriate, these estimates take into consideration a range of possible outcomes in which relevant factors, such as historical experience, current contractual and statutory requirements, specific known market events and trends, industry data and forecasted customer buying and payment patterns, are either probability weighted to derive an estimate of expected value or the estimate reflects the single most likely outcome. Overall, these reserves reflect the best estimates of the amount of consideration to which we are entitled based on the terms of the contract. Actual amounts of consideration ultimately received may differ from our estimates. If actual results in the balance sheet as current liabilities and others are recorded as a reduction in accounts receivable. Changes infuture vary from the estimates, these estimates are adjusted, which would affect revenue and assumptions related toearnings in the period such variances become known. Accrued customer programs may result in additional accruals or allowances. Customer-related accruals and allowances were $512.3 million,
$484.3$125.8 million and $489.4$147.5 million at December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016,2021 and December 31, 2015,2020, respectively.


RevenuesOther Revenue Policies

We receive payments from serviceour customers based on billing schedules established in each contract. Amounts are recorded as accounts receivable when our right to consideration is unconditional. In most cases, the timing of the unconditional right to payment aligns with shipment or delivery of the product and royalty arrangements, including revenues from collaborative agreements, consist primarilythe recognition of royalty payments, paymentsrevenue; however, for R&D services, up-front fees and milestone payments. If an arrangement requires the delivery or performance of multiple deliverables or service elements, we determine whether the individual elements represent separate units of accounting. If the separate elements represent separate units of accounting, we recognize the revenue associated with each element separately andthose customers where revenue is allocated among elements based on their relative selling prices. Ifrecognized at a time prior to shipment or delivery due to over time revenue recognition, a contract asset is recorded and is reclassified to accounts receivable when it becomes unconditional under the elements within a multiple deliverable arrangementcontract upon shipment or delivery to the customer.

Our performance obligations are generally expected to be fulfilled in less than one year. Therefore, we do not provide quantitative information about remaining performance obligations.

89

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1







We do not considered separate unitsassess whether a contract has a significant financing component if the expectation at contract inception is such that the period between payment by the customer and the transfer of accounting, the delivery of an individual element is considered not to have occurred if there are undelivered elements that are considered essentialpromised products to the arrangement.customer will be one year or less, which is the case with substantially all customers.


To the extent such arrangements contain refund clauses triggered by non-performance or other adverse circumstances, revenue is not recognized until all contractual obligationsTaxes collected from customers relating to product sales and remitted to governmental authorities are satisfied. Non-refundable up-front fees are deferred and amortized to revenue over the related performance period. We estimate the performance period based on the specific terms of each collaborative agreement. Revenue associated with R&D services is recognized on a proportional performance basis over the period that we perform the related activities under the terms of the agreement. Revenue resultingexcluded from the achievement of contingent milestone events stipulated in the agreements is recognized when the milestone is achieved. Milestones are based upon the occurrence of a substantive element specified in the contract.revenue.  


Shipping and handling costs billed to customers are included in netNet sales. Conversely, shipping and handling expenses we incur are included in costCost of sales.


Cash and Cash Equivalents


Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of demand deposits and other short-term investments with maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates its fair value.

Accounts Receivable

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts that reduces our receivables to amounts that are expected to be collected. In estimating the allowance, management considers factors such as current overall and industry-specific economic conditions, statutory requirements, historical and anticipated customer performance, historical experience with write-offs and the level of past-due amounts. Changes in these conditions may result in additional allowances. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance.

               In addition, included in our accounts receivable balance is $84.4 million and $83.4 million related to our Tysabri® financial asset at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, for amounts earned that have not yet been received.


Inventories


Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first-in first-out method. Costs include material and conversion costs. Inventory related to research and development ("R&D&D") is expensed at the point when it is determined the materials have no alternative future use.


We maintain reserves for estimated obsolete or unmarketable inventory based on the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated net realizable value. In estimating the reserves, management considers factors such as excess or slow-moving inventories, product expiration dating, products on quality hold, current and future customer demand and market conditions. Changes in these conditions may result in additional reserves (refer to Note 56).
Investments


Available for SaleFair Value Method Investments


We determine the appropriate classification of securities as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading. The classification depends on the purpose forEquity investments in which the financial assets were acquired. Marketable equity securitieswe own less than a 20% interest and cannot exert significant influence are classified as available-for-sale. These securities are carriedrecorded at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in AOCI. The assessmentnet income. For equity investments without readily determinable fair values, we may use the Net Asset Value ("NAV") per share as a practical expedient to measure the fair value, if eligible. If the NAV practical expedient cannot be applied, we may elect to use a measurement alternative until the investment’s fair value becomes readily determinable. Under the alternative method, the equity investments are accounted for impairment of marketable securities classified as available-for-sale is based on established financial methodologies, including quoted market prices for publicly traded securities. If we determine that a loss in the value of an investment is other than temporary, the investment is written down to its estimated fair value. Any such losses are recorded in Other expense, net (refer to Note 7).

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1




Cost Method Investments

Non-marketable equity securities are carried at cost, less any write downimpairment, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in an orderly transaction for impairments, and are adjusted for impairment based on methodologies, an assessmentidentical or similar investment of the impact of general private equity market conditions, and discounted projected future cash flows. Non-marketable equity securities are recorded in Other non-current assets (refer to Note 7).same issuer.


Equity Method Investments

The equity method of accounting is used for unconsolidated entities over which we have significant
influence; generally, this represents ownership interests of at least 20% and not more than 50%. Under the equity method of accounting, we record the investments at carrying value and adjust for a proportionate share of the profits and losses of these entities each period. We evaluate our equity method investments for recoverability. If we determine that a loss in the value of an investment is other than temporary, the investment is written down to its estimated fair value. Any such losses are recorded in Other expense, net. Evaluations of recoverability are based primarily on projected cash flows. Due

For more information on our investments, refer to uncertainties in the estimation process, actual results could differ from such estimates. Equity method investments are recorded in Other non-current assets (refer to Note 710).


Derivative Instruments
    
We recognize the entire change in the fair value of the effective portion of derivatives designated as:

Cash flow hedges in Other Comprehensive Income ("OCI"). The amounts recorded in OCI will subsequently be reclassified to earnings in the same line item on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as impacted by the hedged item when the hedged item affects earnings;

90

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1



Fair value hedges in the same line item on the Consolidated Statements of Operations that is used to present the earnings effect of the hedged item; and

Net investment hedges in OCI classified as a currency translation adjustment. When the net investment in foreign operations is sold or substantially liquidates, the amounts recorded in AOCI are reclassified to earnings.

We exclude option premiums, forward points, and cross-currency basis spread from our assessment of hedge effectiveness, as allowable excluded components from certain of our cash flow and net investment hedges. We have elected to recognize the initial value of the excluded component on a straight-line basis over the life of the derivative instrument, within the same line item on the Consolidated Statements of Operations that is used to present the earnings effect of the hedged item.

We record derivative instruments on the balance sheet on a gross basis as either an asset or liability measured at fair value (refer to Note 87). Additionally, changes in a derivative's fair value, which are measured at the end of each period, are recognized in earnings unless specifica derivative can be designated in a qualifying hedging relationship. All realized and unrealized gains and losses are included within operating activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Designated derivatives meet hedge accounting criteria, are met. If hedge accounting criteria are met for cash flow hedges,which means the changes in a derivative’s fair value areof the hedge is recorded in shareholders’ equity as a component of other comprehensive income ("OCI"),OCI, net of tax. TheseThe deferred gains and losses are recognized in income in the period in which the hedged item and hedging instrument affectaffects earnings. Any ineffective portionAll of our designated derivatives are assessed for hedge effectiveness quarterly.

We also have economic non-designated derivatives that we have not elected hedge accounting. These derivative instruments are adjusted to current market value at the change in fair value is immediately recognized inend of each period through earnings. Gains or losses on these instruments are offset substantially by the remeasurement adjustment on the hedged item.


We are exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties on derivative contracts. It is our policy to manage our credit risk on these transactions by dealing only with financial institutions having a long-term credit rating of "A""Aa3" or better and by distributing the contracts among several financial institutions to diversify credit concentration risk. Should a counterparty default, our maximum exposure to loss is the asset balance of the instrument. The maximum term of our forward currency exchange contracts is 1860 months.

We enter into certain derivative financial instruments, when available on a cost-effective basis, to mitigate our risk associated with changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates as follows:

Interest rate risk management - We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes through our cash investments and borrowings. We utilize a variety of strategies to manage the impact of changes in interest rates including using a mix of debt maturities along with both fixed-rate and variable-rate debt. In addition, we may enter into treasury-lock agreements and interest rate swap agreements on certain investing and borrowing transactions to manage our exposure to interest rate changes and our overall cost of borrowing.

Foreign currency exchange risk management - We conduct business in several major currencies other than the U.S. dollar and are subject to risks associated with changing foreign exchange rates. Our objective is to reduce cash flow volatility associated with foreign exchange rate changes on a consolidated basis to allow management to focus its attention on business operations. Accordingly, we enter into various contracts that change in value as foreign exchange rates change to protect the value of existing foreign currency assets and liabilities, commitments, anticipated foreign currency sales and expenses, and net investments in foreign operations.

All derivative instruments are managed on a consolidated basis to efficiently net exposures and thus take advantage of any natural offsets. Gains and losses related to the derivative instruments are expected to be offset largely by gains and losses on the original underlying asset or liability. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

The impact of gains and losses on foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments related to changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are generally offset by net foreign exchange gains and losses, which are also included on the Consolidated Statements of Operations in Other (income) expense, net for all periods presented. When we enter into foreign exchange contracts not
91

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1



designated as hedging instruments to mitigate the impact of exchange rate volatility in the translation of foreign earnings, gains and losses will generally be offset by fluctuations in the U.S. dollar-translated amounts of each Income Statement account in current and/or future periods. Net foreign exchange losses totaled $26.8 million, $0.3 million, and $3.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019, respectively. The 2021 loss includes a loss of $20.9 million for the change in fair value of the option contracts to hedge the foreign currency exposure of the euro-denominated purchase price for HRA Pharma.

For more information on our derivatives, refer to Note 11.

Property, Plant and Equipment, net


Property, plant and equipment, net areis recorded at cost and areis depreciated using the straight-line method. Useful lives for financial reporting range from 3 to 2010 years for machinery and equipment and 10 to 45 years for buildings. We capitalize certain computer software and development costs, included in machinery and equipment, when incurred in connection with developing or obtaining computer software for internal use. Capitalized software costs are amortized over the estimated useful lives of the software, which range from 3 to 10 years. Maintenance and repair costs are charged to earnings, while expenditures that increase asset lives are capitalized. Depreciation expense includes amortization of assets recorded under capitalfinance leases and totaled $95.2$86.8 million, $100.2$75.6 million, $53.8 million, and$84.377.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017and2021, December 31, 2016, the six months ended2020, and December 31, 2015, and the year ended June 27, 2015,2019, respectively.


We held the following property, plant and equipment, net (in millions):
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Land$51.3 $52.2 
Buildings537.6 516.1 
Machinery and equipment1,186.8 1,157.2 
Gross property, plant and equipment1,775.7 1,725.5 
Less: accumulated depreciation(911.6)(860.9)
Property, plant and equipment, net$864.1 $864.6 

Leases

We lease certain office buildings, warehouse facilities, vehicles, and plant, office, and computer equipment. Lease assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease.
We evaluate arrangements at inception to determine if lease components are included. An arrangement includes a lease component if it identifies an asset and we have control over the asset. For new leases beginning January 1, 2019 or later, we have elected not to separate lease components from the non-lease components included in an arrangement when measuring the leased asset and leased liability for all asset classes.
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Land$45.5
 $45.0
 $47.5
Buildings514.3
 520.2
 508.2
Machinery and equipment1,078.6
 1,094.7
 1,103.3
Gross property, plant and equipment1,638.4
 1,659.9
 1,659.0
Less accumulated depreciation(805.3) (789.8) (772.8)
Property, plant and equipment, net$833.1
 $870.1
 $886.2

Lease assets and liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the estimated present value of lease payments over the lease term. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet. We recognize lease expense for leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term. We apply the portfolio approach to certain groups of computer equipment and vehicle leases when the term, classification, and asset type are identical. The discount rate selected is the incremental borrowing rate we would obtain for a secured financing of the lease asset over a similar term.

Many of our leases include one or more options to extend the lease term. Certain leases also include options to terminate early or purchase the leased property, all of which are executed at our sole discretion. Optional periods may be included in the lease term and measured as part of the lease asset and lease liability if we are reasonably certain to exercise our right to use the leased asset during the optional periods. We generally consider renewal options to be reasonably certain of execution and included in the lease term when significant leasehold improvements have been made by us to the leased assets. The depreciable lives of assets and leasehold improvements are limited by the expected lease term unless there is a transfer of title or purchase option reasonably certain of exercise.

92

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1







Certain of our lease agreements include contingent rental payments based on per unit usage over contractual levels (e.g., miles driven or machine hours used) and others include rental payments adjusted periodically for market reviews or inflationary indexes. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
Financial Assets

PriorFor more information on our leases, refer to its divestiture on March 27, 2017, we accounted for the Tysabri® royalty stream as a financial asset and have elected to use the fair value option model (refer to Note 612). We made the election to account for the Tysabri® financial asset using the fair value option as we believe this method is most appropriate for an asset that does not have a par value, a stated interest stream, or a termination date. The fair value of the Tysabri® financial asset is determined by using a discounted cash flow analysis related to the expected future cash flows to be received. This asset is classified as Level 3 assets within the fair value hierarchy, as our valuation estimates utilize significant unobservable inputs, including estimates as to the probability and timing of future sales of the related products. Critical estimates in determining the fair value are the underlying revenue assumptions of Tysabri® sales and the discount rates. The revenue assumptions are impacted by product demand and market growth assumptions, inventory target levels, product approval, currency movements and pricing assumptions. Factors that could cause a change in estimates of future cash flows include a change in estimated market size, entry of a competitive product that would erode market share, manufacturing and approval of a biosimilar equivalent product, a change in pricing strategy or reimbursement coverage, a delay in obtaining regulatory approval, a change in dosage of the product, or a change in the number of treatments.


Goodwill and Intangible Assets


Goodwill


Goodwill represents amounts paid for an acquisition in excess of the fair value of net assets received.acquired. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually on the first day of our fourth quarter, or more frequently if changes in circumstances or the occurrence of events suggest an impairment exists.


The test for impairment requires us to make several estimates about fair value, most of which are based on projected future cash flows and market valuation multiples. The estimates associated with the goodwill impairment tests are considered critical due to the judgments required in determining fair value amounts, including projected discounted future cash flows. Changes in these estimates may result in the recognition of an impairment loss. Our annualWe have 2 reporting units that are evaluated for impairment tests were performed as of October 1, 2017, October 2, 2016, September 27, 2015, and March 29, 2015, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the six months ended December 31, 2015, and the year endedJune 27, 2015, respectively.2021.


Intangible Assets


We have intangible assets that we have acquired through various business acquisitions and include trademarks, trade names and brands, in-process research and development ("IPR&D"), developed product technology/formulation and product rights, distribution and license agreements, customer relationships and distribution networks, and non-compete agreements. The assets are typically valued initially valued using one of the following valuation methods:

Reliefrelief from royalty method: This method assumes that if or the acquired company did not own the intangible asset or intellectual property, it would be willing to pay a royalty for its use. The benefit of ownership of the intellectual property is valued as the relief from the royalty expense that would otherwise be incurred. We typically use this method for valuing readily transferable intangible assets that have licensing appeal, such as trade names and trademarks and certain technology assets.

Multi-periodmulti-period excess earnings method: This method starts with a forecast of the net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset over its estimated useful life. These cash flows are then adjusted to present value by applying an appropriate discount rate that reflects the risk factors associated with the cash flow streams. We typically use this method for valuing intangible assets such as developed product technology, customer relationships, product formulations and IPR&D.
("MPEEM").

Lost income method: This method estimates the fair value of an asset by comparing the value of the business, inclusive of the asset, to the hypothetical value of the same business excluding the asset.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1




Indefinite-lived intangible assets include IPR&D and certain trademarks, trade names, and brands. IPR&D assets are recognized at fair value and are classified as indefinite-lived assets until the successful completion or abandonment of the associated research and development efforts. If the associated research and development is completed, the IPR&D asset becomes a definite-lived intangible asset and is amortized over the asset's assigned useful life. If it is abandoned, an impairment loss is recorded.


We test indefinite-lived trademarks, trade names, and brands for impairment quarterly,annually, or more frequently if changes in circumstances or the occurrence of events suggest impairment exists, by comparing the carrying value of the assets to their estimated fair values. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable and its carrying amount exceeds its fair value.


Definite-lived intangible assets consist of a portfolio of developed product technology/formulation and product rights, distribution and license agreements, customer relationships, non-compete agreements, and certain trademarks, trade names, and brands. The assets are amortized on either a straight-line basis or proportionately to the benefits derived from those relationships or agreements. Useful lives vary by asset type and are determined based on the period over which the intangible asset is expected to contribute directly or indirectly to our future cash flows. We also review all other long-lived assets that have finite lives and that are not held for sale for impairment when indicators of impairment are evident by comparing the carrying value of the assets to their estimated future undiscounted cash flows.


IPR&D assets are recognized at fair value and are classified as indefinite-lived assets until the successful completion or abandonment of the associated R&D efforts. If the associated R&D is completed, the IPR&D asset becomes a definite-lived intangible asset and is amortized over the asset's assigned useful life. If it is abandoned, an impairment loss is recorded.

Goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible asset, and definite-lived intangible asset impairments are recorded in Impairment charges on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. See Note 34 for further information on our goodwill and intangible assets.

Assets Held for Sale

We classify assets as "held for sale" when management approves and commits to a formal plan of sale with the expectation the sale will be completed within one year. The net assets of the business held for sale are then recorded at the lower of their current carrying value and the fair market value, less costs to sell (refer to Note 9).
Deferred Financing Fees

We record deferred financing fees as a reduction of long-term debt.


Share-Based Awards


We measure and record compensation expense for all share-based awards based on estimated grant date fair values, and net of any estimated forfeituresvalues. For awards with only service conditions that are based on graded vesting schedules, we recognize the compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vestingentire award. Forfeitures on share-based awards are recognized in compensation expense in the period of the awards. Forfeiture rates are estimated at the grant date based on historical experience and adjusted in subsequent periods for any differences in actual forfeitures from those estimates.which they occur.


93

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1



We estimate the fair value of stock option awards granted based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires the use of subjective and complex assumptions. These assumptions include estimating the expected term that awards granted are expected to be outstanding, the expected volatility of our stock price for a period commensurate with the expected term of the related options, and the risk-free rate with a maturity closest to the expected term of the related awards. Restricted stock and restricted stock units are valued based on our stock price on the day the awards are granted. The estimated fair value of outstanding Relative Total Shareholder Return performance units (“RTSR”) is based on the grant date fair value of RTSR awards using a Monte Carlo simulation, which includes estimating the movement of stock prices and the effects of volatility, interest rates, and dividends (refer to Note 1215).


Income Taxes


We record deferred income tax assets and liabilities on the balance sheet as noncurrent based upon the difference between the financial reporting and the tax reporting basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates. To the extent that available evidence raises doubt about the realization of a deferred income tax asset, a valuation allowance is established.


We have provided for income taxes for certainundistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries which have not been
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1




deemed to be permanently reinvested. For those foreign subsidiaries we have deemed to be permanently reinvested, we have provided no further tax provision.


We record reserves for uncertain tax positions to the extent it is more likely than not that the tax return position will be sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. Periodic changes in reserves for uncertain tax positions are reflected in the provision for income taxes. We include interest and penalties attributable to uncertain tax positions and income taxes as a component of our income tax provision (refer to Note 1417).


Legal Contingencies


We are involved in product liability, patent, commercial, regulatory and other legal proceedings that arise in the normal course of business. We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If the reasonable estimate of a probable loss is a range and no amount within that range is a better estimate, the minimum amount in the range is accrued. If a loss is not probable or a probable loss cannot be reasonably estimated, no liability is recorded. We have established reserves for certain of our legal matters (refer to Note 1619). We alsodo not incorporate insurance recoveries into our reserves for legal contingencies. We separately record anyreceivables for amounts due under insurance policies when we consider the realization of recoveries that arefor claims to be probable, of occurring.which may be different than the timing in which we establish the loss reserves.


Research and Development


All R&D costs, including payments related to products under development and research consulting agreements, are expensed as incurred. We incur costs throughout the development cycle, including costs for research, clinical trials, manufacturing validation, and other pre-commercialization approval costs that are included in R&D. We may continue to make non-refundable payments to third parties for new technologies and for R&D work that has been completed. These payments may be expensed at the time of payment depending on the nature of the payment made. R&D expense was $167.7$122.0 million, $184.0 million, $88.2$121.7 million, and $187.8$119.2 million, for the years ended December 31, 2017,2021, December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2016, the six months endedDecember 31, 2015 and the year ended June 27, 2015,2019, respectively.


The year ended December 31, 2017 included R&D expense related to new product development and clinical trial expenses in our CHCA, CHCI and RX segments. The year ended December 31, 2016 included R&D expense related to clinical trials primarily in our CHCA and RX segments. The six months ended December 31, 2015 included incremental R&D expense attributable to the Omega Pharma Invest N.V. ("Omega") acquisition. The year ended June 27, 2015 included incremental R&D expense related to a collaboration agreement entered into as a result the Omega acquisition.

We actively collaborate with other pharmaceutical companies to develop, manufacture and market certain products or groups of products. We may choose to enter into these types of agreements to, among other things, leverage our or others’ scientific research and development expertise or utilize our extensive marketing and distribution resources. Our policy on accounting for costs of strategic collaborations determines the timing of the recognition of certain development costs. In addition, this policy determines whether the cost is classified as a development expense or capitalized as an asset. Management is required to form judgments with respect to the commercial status of such products in determining whether development costs meet the criteria for immediate expense or capitalization. For example, when we acquire certain products for which there is already an Abbreviated New Drug Application ("ANDA") or New Drug Application ("NDA") approval directly related to the product, and there is net realizable value based on projected sales for these products, we capitalize the amount paid as an intangible asset. If we acquire product rights that are in the development phase and as to which we have no assurance that the third party will successfully complete its development milestones, we expense the amount paid (refer to Note 17 for more information on our current collaboration agreements).

paid.
94

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1








We enter into a number of collaboration agreements in the ordinary course of business. Terms of such agreements may require us to make or receive milestone payments upon the achievement of certain product research and development objectives and pay or receive royalties on the future sale, if any, of commercial products resulting from the collaboration. Milestone and up-front payments made, and other research and development costs or reimbursements related to collaboration agreements, are generally recorded in research and development expense if the payments relate to drug candidates that have not yet received regulatory approval. Milestone and up-front payments made related to approved drugs will generally be capitalized and amortized to cost of goods sold over the economic life of the product. Royalties received are generally reflected as revenue, and royalties paid are generally reflected as cost of goods sold.

Advertising Costs
    
We expense advertising costs as incurred. Advertising costs relate primarily to print advertising, direct mail, on-line advertising, and social media communications.communications, and television advertising and are expensed as incurred. For the year ended December 31, 20172021, 94%90% of advertising expense was attributable to our CHCICSCI segment. Advertising costs were as follows (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31, 2020December 31,
2019
$130.9 $130.5 $142.8 
Year EndedSix Months Ended Year Ended
December 31,
2017
 December 31, 2016 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
$145.3
 $155.9
 $77.5
 $55.7


Earnings per Share ("EPS")


Basic EPS is calculated using the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding during each period. It excludes both the dilutive effects of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the shares issued under stock incentive plans had been exercised and the dilutive effect of restricted shares and restricted share units, to the extent those shares and units have not vested. Diluted EPS is calculated including the effects of shares and potential shares issued under stock incentive plans, following the treasury stock method.


Defined Benefit Plans


We operate a number of defined benefit plans for employees globally.


Two significant assumptions, the discount rate and the expected rate of return on plan assets, are important elements of expense and liability measurement. We evaluate these assumptions annually. Other assumptions involve employee demographic factors, such as retirement patterns, mortality, turnover, and the rate of compensation increase.


The liability recognized in the balance sheet in respect of defined benefit pension plans is the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the balance sheet date less the fair value of plan assets. The defined benefit obligation is calculated periodically by independent actuaries using the projected unit credit method. The present value of the defined benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated future cash outflows using interest rates of either high quality corporate bonds or long term government bonds depending on the depth and liquidity of the high quality corporate bond market in the different geographies where we have pension liabilities. The bonds are denominated in the currency in which the benefits will be paid and that have terms to maturity approximating the terms of the related pension liability.     


Actuarial gains and losses are recognized on the Consolidated Statement of Operations using the corridor method. Under the corridor method, to the extent that any cumulative unrecognized net actuarial gain or loss exceeds 10% of the greater of the present value of the defined benefit obligation and the fair value of the plan assets, that portion is recognized over the expected average remaining working lives of the plan participants. Otherwise, the net actuarial gain or loss is recorded in OCI. We recognize the funded status of benefit plans on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In addition, we recognize the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic pension cost of the period as a component of OCI (refer to Note 1518).


95

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1



Allowance for Credit Losses

Expected credit losses on trade receivables and contract assets are measured collectively by geographic location. The estimate of expected credit losses considers historical credit loss information that is adjusted for current conditions and for reasonable and supportable forecasts. Historical credit loss experience provides the primary basis for estimation of expected credit losses. Adjustments to historical loss information may be made for significant changes in a geographic location’s economic conditions. Receivables that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. These receivables are not included in the collective evaluation.
The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the instruments’ cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected. Trade receivables and contract assets are charged off against the allowance when the balance is no longer deemed collectible.
The following table presents the allowance for credit losses activity (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Balance at beginning of period$6.5 $6.0 
Provision for credit losses, net4.0 2.3 
Receivables written-off(0.7)(2.2)
Transfer to held for sale(1.4)— 
Currency translation adjustment(1.2)0.4 
Balance at end of period$7.2 $6.5 
Recent Accounting Standard Pronouncements


Below are recent accounting standard updatesAccounting Standard Updates ("ASU") that we have adopted or are still assessing to determine the effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements. We do not believe that any other recently issued accounting standards could have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements. As new accounting pronouncements are issued, we will adopt those that are applicable under the circumstances.



Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1




Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
StandardDescriptionEffective Date of adoptionEffect on the Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
Clarifying the Definition of aASU 2021-08: BusinessThis update clarifies the definition of a business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and addresses whether transactions should be accounted for as asset acquisitions or business combinations (or divestitures). The guidance includes an initial threshold that an acquired set of assets will not be considered a business if substantially all of the fair value of the assets acquired is concentrated in a single tangible or identifiable intangible asset (or group of similar assets). If the acquired set does not pass the initial threshold, then the guidance requires that, to be a business, the set must include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. Different factors are considered to determine whether the set includes a substantive process, such as the inclusion of an organized workforce. Further, the guidance removes language stating that a business need not include all of the inputs and processes that the seller used in operating the business.January 1, 2017
We early adopted this new standard and will apply it prospectively when determining whether transactions should be accounted for as asset acquisitions (divestitures) or business combinations (divestitures). During the year ended December 31, 2017, we applied the new guidance when determining whether certain product divestitures represented sales of assets or businesses.

Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting
This guidance is intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions. It will require all income tax effects of awards to be recorded through the income statement when the awards vest or settle as opposed to certain amounts being recorded in additional paid-in capital. An entity will also have to elect whether to account for forfeitures as they occur or by estimating the number of awards expected to be forfeited and adjusting the estimate when it is likely to change (as currently required). The guidance will also increase the amount an employer can withhold to cover income taxes on awards.January 1, 2017We adopted this standard as of January 1, 2017. We elected to estimate the number of awards expected to be forfeited and adjust the estimate when it is likely to change, consistent with past practice. We did not change the amounts that we withhold to cover income taxes on awards. As the requirement to record all income tax effects of vested or settled awards through the income statement is prospective in nature, there was no cumulative effect of adopting the standard on our balance sheet.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1




Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
StandardDescriptionEffective DateEffect on the Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
RevenueContract Liabilities from Contracts with CustomersThe core principle of theThis guidance is that an entity should recognize revenueamends ASC 805 to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: identify the contract(s) with a customer; identify the performance obligations in the contract; determine the transaction price; allocate the transaction priceadd contract assets and contract liabilities to the performance obligations in the contract; and recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. This guidance allows for two adoption methods, full retrospective approach or modified retrospective approach.January 1, 2018We have substantially completed our evaluationlist of the impact of adoption of the new revenue standard  on our Consolidated Financial Statements. We will adopt the new revenue standard effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method. Upon adoption, we anticipate recognizing an adjustment of $5.4 millionexceptions to the opening balance of retained earnings. The impact of adoption relates primarilyrecognition and measurement principles that apply to the new guidance on when revenue should be recognized, focusing on indicators of the customer gaining control. Under this new model, in certain cases revenue may be recognized over-time as opposedbusiness combinations and to a point in time. In our business, revenue may be recognized over-time for certain of our contract manufacturing and private label arrangements in which we produce products that do not have an alternative use, and if the contracts with customers were canceled, we would have an enforceable rightrequire acquiring entities to payment for performance completed to date, inclusive of a reasonable profit margin. As a result, we expectapply Topic 606 to recognize revenue earlierand measure contract assets and contract liabilities in the performance period for these arrangements as product is customized, as opposed to when units are shipped or delivered. Our assessment of the new revenue standard has also included, but has not been limited to, estimation of variable consideration and identification of performance obligations and we have determined that the related accounting is not materially different compared to our current practice.
Intra-Entity Asset Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventorya business combination. Under the new guidance, the tax impact to the seller on the profit from the transfers and the buyer’s deferred tax benefit on the increased tax basis would be recognized when the transfers occur, resulting in the recognition of expense sooner than under historical guidance. The guidance excludes intra-entity transfers of inventory. For intra-entity transfers of inventory, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") decided to retain current GAAP, which requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences when the inventory has been sold to an outside party.January 1, 2018
We have identified certain intra-entity asset transfers that will require an adjustment; based on our current analysis, no material adjustments have been identified at this time.

Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and LiabilitiesThe objective of this simplification update is to improve the decision usefulness of financial instrument reporting, and it principally affects accounting for equity investments currently classified as available for sale and financial liabilities where the fair value option has been elected. Entities will have to measure many equity investmentsacquirer generally recognizes such items at fair value and recognize changes in fair value in net income rather than other comprehensive income as required under current U.S. GAAP.at acquisition date.January 1, 2018We have identified certain investments that will require an adjustment; based on our current analysis, no material adjustments have been identified at this time.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1




2023
Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted (continued)
StandardDescriptionEffective DateEffectUpon adoption on the Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
LeasesThis guidance was issuedeffective date, the amendments will be applied prospectively to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. For leases with a term of 12 months or less, lessees arebusiness combinations. Early adoption is permitted to makein an election to not recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities. Upon adoption, lessees will apply the new standard as ofinterim period; however, retrospective application is required for any acquisitions occurring after the beginning of the earliest comparativefiscal year that includes the interim period presented in the financial statements, however lessees will be able to exclude leases that expire as of the implementation date. Early adoption is permitted.January 1, 2019early application. We are currently evaluatingassessing the implications of adoption on our Consolidated Financial Statements. The actual impact will depend on our lease portfolio at the time of adoption. We have commenced the first step of identifying a task force to take the lead in implementing the new lease standard.
Derivatives and HedgingThis update was issued to enable entities to better portray the economics of their risk management activities in the financial statements and enhance the transparency and understandability of hedge results. In addition, the amendments simplify the application of hedge accounting in certain situations. Under the new rule, the entity’s ability to hedge non-financial and financial risk components is expanded. The guidance eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness and also eases certain documentation and assessment requirements. Early adoption is permitted.January 1, 2019
We are currently evaluating the implications of adoption on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial InstrumentsThis guidance changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments, replacing the current "incurred loss" approach with an "expected loss" credit impairment model, which will apply to most financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments, including trade and other receivables, loans, held-to-maturity debt securities, and off-balance sheet credit exposures such as letters of credit. Early adoption is permitted.January 1, 2020We are currently evaluating the new standard for potential impacts on our receivables, debt, and other financial instruments.
Intangibles - Goodwill and Other Simplifying the Test for GoodwillThe objective of this update isstandard; however, we do not anticipate a material impact from applying the recognition and measurement principles of Topic 606 to reduce the cost and complexity of subsequent goodwill accounting by simplifying the impairment test by removing the Step 2 requirement to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation when the carrying valuecontract assets or liabilities acquired as part of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. If a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, an entity would record an impairment charge based on that difference, limited to the amount of goodwill attributed to that reporting unit. The proposal would not change the guidance on completing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. The proposed guidance would be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted.January 1, 2020
We are currently evaluating the implications of adoption on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

business combination.


NOTE 2 - REVENUE RECOGNITION

Revenue is recognized when or as a customer obtains control of promised products. The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled to receive in exchange for these products.

96

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 2





Disaggregation of Revenue

We generated net sales in the following geographic locations(1) during each of the periods presented below (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
U.S.$2,565.9 $2,579.0 $2,360.3 
Europe(2)
1,393.0 1,350.6 1,335.8 
All other countries(3)
179.8 158.6 173.8 
Total net sales$4,138.7 $4,088.2 $3,869.9 

(1)    The net sales by geography is derived from the location of the entity that sells to a third party.
(2)    Includes Ireland net sales of $23.7 million, $29.8 million, and $23.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019, respectively.
(3)    Includes revenue generated primarily in Mexico, Australia, and Canada.
Product Category

The following is a summary of our net sales by category (in millions):

Year Ended
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020December 31,
2019
CSCA(1)
Upper respiratory$483.1 $505.8 $529.3 
Digestive health475.1 471.3 429.2 
Pain and sleep-aids405.4 434.5 390.9 
Nutrition401.9 388.3 395.3 
Oral care311.9 288.2 111.7 
Healthy lifestyle297.7 352.4 356.1 
Skincare and personal hygiene219.2 200.6 191.3 
Vitamins, minerals, and supplements31.7 27.0 28.6 
Animal health— — 43.7 
Other CSCA(2)
67.1 24.9 11.6 
Total CSCA2,693.1 2,693.0 2,487.7 
CSCI
Skincare and personal hygiene394.3 351.8 371.6 
Upper respiratory226.2 255.1 276.8 
Vitamins, minerals, and supplements217.4 201.0 180.2 
Pain and sleep-aids201.8 190.4 167.9 
Healthy lifestyle179.3 165.4 173.8 
Oral care95.8 97.8 51.2 
Digestive health38.4 26.5 27.1 
Other CSCI(3)
92.4 107.2 133.6 
Total CSCI1,445.6 1,395.2 1,382.2 
Total net sales$4,138.7 $4,088.2 $3,869.9 

(1)    Includes net sales from our OTC contract manufacturing business.
(2)    Consists primarily of product sales and royalty income related to supply and distribution agreements, diagnostic products and other miscellaneous or otherwise uncategorized product lines and markets, none of which is greater than 10% of the segment net sales.
(3)    Consists primarily of liquid licensed products, our distribution business and other miscellaneous or otherwise uncategorized product lines and markets, none of which is greater than 10% of the segment net sales.

97

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 2


While the majority of revenue is recognized at a point in time, certain of our product revenue is recognized on an over time basis. Predominately, over time customer contracts exist in contract manufacturing arrangements, which occur in both the CSCA and CSCI segments. Contract manufacturing revenue was $299.7 million, $261.4 million, and $285.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019, respectively.

We also recognize a portion of the store brand OTC product revenues in the CSCA segment on an over time basis; however, the timing difference between over time and point in time revenue recognition for store brand contracts is not significant due to the short time period between the customization of the product and shipment or delivery.

Contract Balances

The following table provides information about contract assets from contracts with customers (in millions):
Balance Sheet LocationDecember 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Short-term contract assetsPrepaid expenses and other current assets$40.2 $19.7 

NOTE 23 - ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES


All of the below acquisitions, with the exception of the generic Benzaclin™ product purchase, have been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting based on our analysis of the acquired inputs and processes, and the related assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at fair value as of the acquisition date.

Fair value estimates are based on a complex series of judgments about future events and rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. The judgments used to determine the estimated fair value assigned to each class of assets and liabilities assumed, as well as asset lives, can materially impact our results of operations.

The effects of all of the acquisitions described below were included in the Consolidated Financial Statements prospectively from the date of each acquisition. Unless otherwise indicated, acquisition costs incurred were immaterial and were recorded in Administration expense.

Acquisitions Completed During the Year Ended December 31, 20162021


Generic Benzaclin ProductHéra SAS (“HRA Pharma”) Acquisition Agreement


On September 8, 2021, we and our wholly-owned subsidiary Habsont Unlimited Company (the "Purchaser"), entered into a Put Option Agreement to acquire certain holding companies holding all of the outstanding equity interests of HRA Pharma from funds affiliated with private equity firms Astorg and Goldman Sachs Asset Management (collectively, the "Sellers"). Pursuant to the Put Option Agreement, following completion of the works council consultation process required under French law, the selling shareholders exercised their put option right under the Put Option Agreement and, on October 20, 2021, the Company, the Purchaser and the Sellers entered into a Securities Sale Agreement in the form previously agreed by the parties (the “Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement, the Purchaser has agreed to acquire certain holding companies holding all of the outstanding equity interests of HRA Pharma from the Sellers for cash. The transaction values HRA Pharma at approximately €1.8 billion, or approximately $2.1 billion based on exchange rates as of the date of the Put Option Agreement, on an enterprise value basis and using a lockbox mechanism set forth in the Purchase Agreement. In September 2021, we entered into 2 non-designated currency option contracts to hedge the foreign currency exposure of the euro-denominated purchase price for HRA Pharma (refer to Note 11).

The proposed final transaction is expected to close in the first half of 2022, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals. We intend to pay the purchase price using a combination of cash on hand and, depending upon market conditions, either funds available under our current credit facility or funds from new debt financing. Operating results are expected to be reported within both our CSCA and CSCI segments.

98

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 3

Acquisitions During the Year Ended December 31, 2020

Eastern European OTC Dermatological Brands Acquisition
On October 30, 2020, we acquired 3 Eastern European OTC dermatological brands ("Eastern European Brands"), skincare brands Emolium®, Iwostin®, and hair loss treatment brand Loxon® from Sanofi. The transaction closed for €53.3 million ($62.3 million). We capitalized $52.5 million as brand-named intangible assets and allocated the remainder of the purchase price to goodwill, inventory, customer relationships and deferred tax assets.

The addition of these market-leading OTC brands complements our already robust skincare portfolio and adds scale to our Eastern European business. The acquisition also serves as another step for our CSCI growth plan and provides new opportunities for self-care revenue synergy in the European markets. The operating results of the brands are reported within our CSCI segment. The acquisition of the Eastern European Brands was accounted for as a business combination and has been reported in our Consolidated Statements of Operations as of the acquisition date.

The goodwill arising from the acquisition consists largely of the assembled workforce, and the cost and revenue synergies expected from integrating the business into the CSCI segment. The goodwill was allocated to our CSCI segment, none of which is deductible for income tax purposes. The definite-lived intangible assets acquired consisted of brands and customer relationships which are being amortized over a weighted average useful life of approximately 18.8 years. Both the brands and customer relationships were valued using the multi-period excess earnings method. Significant judgment was applied in estimating the fair value of the intangible assets acquired, which involved the use of significant estimates and assumptions with respect to the timing and amounts of cash flow projections, including revenue growth rates, projected profit margins, and discount rates. The opening balance sheet is final.

Oral Care Assets of High Ridge Brands
On August 2, 2016,April 1, 2020, we acquired the oral care assets of High Ridge Brands ("Dr. Fresh") for total purchase consideration of $113.0 million, subject to customary post-closing adjustments, including a working capital settlement. After post-closing adjustments as of December 31, 2020, total cash consideration paid was $106.2 million, net of $2.0 million that we allocated as prepayment of contract consideration for transitional services received related to the transaction.

This acquisition includes the children’s oral care value brand, Firefly®, in addition to the REACH® and Dr. Fresh® brands, and a licensing portfolio. The U.S. operations, which represent a significant portion of the business, are reported in our CSCA segment and the remaining non-U.S. operations are reported in our CSCI segment.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we incurred $4.4 million of general transaction costs (legal, banking and other professional fees). The amounts were recorded in Administration expenses within the CSCA segment.

The acquisition of Dr. Fresh was accounted for as a business combination and has been reported in our Consolidated Statements of Operations as of the acquisition date. From April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, the acquisition generated Net sales of $72.3 million and pre-tax income of $2.1 million, which included $2.0 million related to inventory costs stepped up to acquisition date fair value.
99

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 3


The following table summarizes the consideration paid for Dr. Fresh and the provisional amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in millions):
Oral Care Assets of High Ridge Brands (Dr. Fresh)
Purchase price paid$106.2 
Assets acquired:
Accounts receivable$13.1 
Inventories22.2 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets0.4 
Property, plant and equipment, net0.7 
Operating lease assets2.6 
Goodwill17.2 
Distribution and license agreements and supply agreements2.2 
Developed product technology, formulations, and product rights0.1 
Customer relationships and distribution networks20.6 
Trademarks, trade names, and brands43.2 
Total intangible assets$66.1 
Total assets$122.3 
Liabilities assumed:
Accounts payable$6.1 
Other accrued liabilities3.8 
Payroll and related taxes0.7 
Accrued customer programs3.0 
Other non-current liabilities2.5 
Total liabilities$16.1 
Net assets acquired$106.2 

The goodwill of $17.2 million arising from the acquisition consists largely of the anticipated growth from new product sales, sales to new customers, the assembled workforce, and the synergies expected from combining the operations of Dr. Fresh into Perrigo. The goodwill is attributable to our CSCA segment and is tax deductible for income tax purposes. The definite-lived intangible assets acquired consisted of trademarks and trade names, license agreements, and customer relationships which are being amortized over a weighted average useful life of approximately 17.8 years. Customer relationships were valued using the multi-period excess earnings method. Trademarks and trade names and developed technology were valued using the relief from royalty method. Significant judgment was applied in estimating the fair value of the intangible assets acquired, which involved the use of significant estimates and assumptions with respect to the timing and amounts of cash flow projections, including revenue growth rates, projected profit margins, and discount rates. The opening balance sheet is final.

Dexsil®
On February 13, 2020, we acquired Dexsil®,a silicon supplement brand, from RXW Group NV, for total cash consideration paid of approximately $8.0 million. The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition, in which we capitalized the consideration paid as a brand-named intangible asset. We began amortizing the brand intangible over a 25-year useful life. Operating results attributable to the product are included within our CSCI segment.

100

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 3

Steripod®

On January 3, 2020, we acquired Steripod®, a leading toothbrush accessory brand and innovator in the toothbrush protector market, from Bonfit America Inc. Total consideration paid was $26.0 million. The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition, in which we capitalized $25.1 million as a brand-named intangible asset. The remainder of the purchase price was allocated to working capital. We began amortizing the brand intangible over a 25-year useful life. Operating results attributable to the product are included within our CSCA segment.

Acquisitions During the Year Ended December 31, 2019

Prevacid®24HR

On November 29, 2019, we acquired the branded OTC rights to Prevacid®24HR from GlaxoSmithKline for $61.5 million in cash. We capitalized $61.7 million, inclusive of closing costs, as a brand named intangible asset and began amortizing it over a 20-year useful life. Operating results attributable to the product are included within our CSCA segment.

Ranir Global Holdings, LLC

On July 1, 2019, we acquired 100% of the outstanding equity interest in Ranir Global Holdings, LLC ("Ranir"), a privately-held company, for total base consideration of $750.0 million in a debt-free, cash-free transaction. After post-closing adjustments, total cash consideration paid was $747.7 million, net of $11.5 million cash acquired. We funded the transaction with cash on hand and borrowings under the 2018 Revolver (as defined in Note 13).

Ranir is headquartered in Grand Rapids, Michigan and is a leading global supplier of private label and branded oral care products. Ranir's U.S. operations are reported in our CSCA segment and its non-U.S. operations are reported in our CSCI segment.

The acquisition of Ranir was accounted for as a business combination and has been reported in our Consolidated Statements of Operations as of the acquisition date. From July 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019, Ranir generated Net sales of $151.4 million and had $7.6 million of Net income, which is inclusive of a non-recurring charge of $5.7 million related to inventory costs stepped up to acquisition date fair value.

101

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 3

The following table summarizes the consideration paid for Ranir and the amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in millions):
Ranir
Purchase price paid$759.2 
Assets acquired:
Cash and cash equivalents$11.5 
Accounts receivable40.6 
Inventories59.0 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets4.0 
Property, plant and equipment, net40.8 
Operating lease assets3.7 
Goodwill292.7 
Definite-lived intangibles:
Developed product technology, formulations, and product rights48.6 
Customer relationships and distribution networks260.0 
Trademarks, trade names, and brands41.0 
Indefinite-lived intangibles:
In-process research and development39.7 
Total intangible assets$389.3 
Other non-current assets2.8 
Total assets$844.4 
Liabilities assumed:
Accounts payable$17.6 
Other accrued liabilities7.7 
Payroll and related taxes5.5 
Accrued customer programs5.7 
Deferred income taxes45.9 
Other non-current liabilities2.8 
Total liabilities$85.2 
Net assets acquired$759.2 

The goodwill of $292.7 million arising from the acquisition consists largely of the anticipated growth from new product sales, sales to new customers, the assembled workforce, and the synergies expected from combining the operations of Perrigo and Ranir. Goodwill of $212.6 million and $80.1 million was allocated to our CSCA and CSCI segments, respectively. We expect $252.3 million to be deductible for income tax purposes. The definite-lived intangible assets acquired consisted of trademarks and trade names, developed product technologies, and customer relationships. Trademarks and trade names were assigned useful lives that ranged from 20 to 25-years. Developed product technologies were assigned 10-year useful lives and customer relationships were assigned 24-year useful lives. Customer relationships were valued using the multi-period excess earnings method. Trademarks and trade names, developed technology, and in-process research and development ("IPR&D") were valued using the relief from royalty method. Significant judgment was applied in estimating the fair value of the intangible assets acquired, which involved the use of significant estimates and assumptions with respect to the timing and amounts of cash flow projections, including revenue growth rates, projected profit margins, and discount rates. The opening balance sheet is final.

Generic Product Acquisition

On May 17, 2019, we purchased the remaining 60.9% product rights toANDA for a generic Benzaclin™ product ("Generic Benzaclin™"),used to relieve pain, for $15.7 million in cash, which we hadcapitalized as a developed product technology intangible asset. We launched the product during the third quarter of 2019 and marketed in collaboration withbegan amortizing it over a 20-year useful life. Operating results attributable to the product are included within our CSCA segment.

102

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 3

Budesonide Nasal Spray and Triamcinolone Nasal Spray

On April 1, 2019, we purchased product ANDAs and other records and registrations of Budesonide Nasal Spray, a generic equivalent of Rhinocort Allergy®, and Triamcinolone Nasal Spray, a generic equivalent of Nasacort Allergy®, from Barr Laboratories, Inc. ("Barr"), a subsidiary of Teva Pharmaceuticals, for $62.0$14.0 million in cash. In September 2007, we entered into an initialWe previously developed and marketed the products in collaboration with Barr under a development, marketing and commercialization agreement with Barr,that originated in which Barr contributed to the product's development costs and we developed and marketed the product in the U.S. and Israel.August 2003. Under this prior agreement, we paid Barr a percentage of net income from products sold by Perrigo in the product's sales in these territories, adjusted for Barr's contributions to the product's development costs.U.S. By purchasing the remaining product rightsassets from Barr and terminating the original development, marketing and commercialization agreement, we are now entitled to 100% of the income from sales of the product. Operating results attributable to Generic Benzaclin™these products are included within our RX segment. The intangible asset acquired is a distribution and license agreement with a nine-year useful life.

Tretinoin Product Portfolio

On January 22, 2016, we acquired a portfolio of generic dosage forms and strengths of Retin-A® (tretinoin), a topical prescription acne treatment, from Matawan Pharmaceuticals, LLC, for $416.4 million in cash ("Tretinoin Products"), which further expanded our standard topical products such as creams, lotions and gels, as well as inhalants and injections ("extended topicals") portfolio. We were the authorized generic distributor of these products from 2005 to 2013. Operating results attributable to the acquisition are included within our RXCSCA segment. The intangible assets acquired included genericare classified as developed product rights valued using the multi-period excess earnings method and assigned a 20-year useful life, and non-compete agreements valued using the lost income method and assigned a five-year useful life. The goodwill acquired is deductible for tax purposes.

Development-Stage Rx Products

In May 2015, we entered into an agreementtechnology with a clinical stage biotechnology company for two specialty pharmaceutical products in development ("Development-Stage Rx Products"). We paid $18.0 million for an option to acquire10-year useful life.

Pro Forma Impact of Business Combinations

The following table presents unaudited pro forma information as if the two products, which was recorded in R&D expense. On Marchacquisition of Ranir, Dr. Fresh and the Eastern European brands occurred on January 1, 2016, to further invest2019, and had been combined with the results reported in our specialty "prescription only" ("Rx") portfolio, we exercised the optionConsolidated Statements of Operations for both products, which requires us to make contingent payments if we obtain regulatory approvalall periods presented (in millions):
Year Ended
(Unaudited)December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Net sales$4,136.5 $4,144.7 
Income from continuing operations$58.2 $185.0 

The unaudited pro forma information is presented for information purposes only and achieve certain sales milestones. We will also be obligated to make certain royalty payments over periods ranging from seven to ten years from the launch of each product. 

We accounted for the option exercise as a business acquisition within our RX segment, recording IPR&D and contingent consideration on the balance sheet. The IPR&D was valued using the multi-period excess earnings method and has an indefinite useful life until such time as the research is completed (at which time it will become a definite-lived intangible asset), or is determined to have no future use (at which time it would be impaired). The contingent consideration is an estimatenot indicative of the future milestone paymentsresults that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place at such time. The unaudited pro forma information presented above includes adjustments primarily for amortization charges for acquired intangible assets, depreciation of property, plant and royalties based on probability-weighted outcomes, sensitivity analysis,equipment that have been revalued, certain acquisition-related charges, and discount rates reflective of the risk involved. The amount of contingent consideration recognized was $24.9 million and was recorded in Other non-current liabilities. On December 20,related tax effects.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 2



2017, we completed the sale of one of the Development-Stage Rx Products to an ophthalmic pharmaceutical company (see below for additional details on the divestiture).

Purchase Price Allocation of Acquisitions CompletedDivestitures During the Year Ended December 31, 2016     2021


The Tretinoin Products, Developed-Stage Rx Products, and four product acquisitions opening balance sheets are final. The below table indicates the purchase price allocations for acquisitions completed during the year endedDecember 31, 2016 (in millions):RX business

 Tretinoin Products Development-Stage Rx Products 
All Other(1)
Purchase price paid$416.4
 $
 $17.1
Contingent consideration
 24.9
 26.2
Total purchase consideration$416.4
 $24.9
 $43.3
      
Assets acquired:     
Cash and cash equivalents$
 $
 $3.8
Accounts receivable
 
 4.9
Inventories1.4
 
 7.1
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 
 0.1
Property, plant and equipment, net
 
 1.2
Goodwill1.7
 
 
Definite-lived intangibles:
     
Distribution and license agreements, supply agreements$
 $
 $1.8
Developed product technology, formulations, and product rights411.0
 
 18.0
Customer relationships and distribution networks
 
 8.2
Non-compete agreements2.3
 
 
Indefinite-lived intangibles:
     
In-process research and development$
 $24.9
 $4.9
Total intangible assets$413.3
 $24.9
 $32.9
Total assets$416.4
 $24.9
 $50.0
Liabilities assumed:     
Accounts payable$
 $
 $2.8
Accrued liabilities
 
 0.1
Long-term debt
 
 3.3
Net deferred income tax liabilities
 
 0.5
Total liabilities$
 $
 $6.7
Net assets acquired$416.4
 $24.9
 $43.3

(1)Consists of four product acquisitions in our CHCA, CHCI and RX segments.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 2



Acquisitions Completed During the Six Months Ended December 31, 2015

Entocort®

On December 15, 2015, we completed our acquisition of Entocort® (budesonide) capsules, as well as the authorized generic capsules, for sale within the U.S., from AstraZeneca plc for $380.2 million in cash. Entocort® is a gastroenterology medicine for patients with mildRefer to moderate Crohn's disease. The acquisition complemented our Rx portfolio. Operating results attributable to the acquisition are included within our RX segment. The intangible assets acquired included branded and authorized generic product rights with useful lives of 10 and 15 years, respectively, which were valued using the multi-period excess earnings method. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we recorded an impairment charge of $342.2 million (refer to Note 3).

Naturwohl Pharma GmbH

On September 15, 2015, we completed our acquisition of 100% of Naturwohl Pharma GmbH ("Naturwohl"), a Munich, Germany-based nutritional business known for its leading German dietary supplement brand, Yokebe®. The acquisition built on our CHCI segment's OTC product portfolio and European commercial infrastructure. The assets were purchased through an all-cash transaction valued at €133.5 million ($150.4 million). Operating results attributable to Naturwohl are included in the CHCI segment. The intangible assets acquired included a trademark with a 20-year useful life, customer relationships with a 15-year useful life, non-compete agreements with a three-year useful life, and a licensing agreement with a three-year useful life. We utilized the relief from royalty method for valuing the trademark, the multi-period excess earnings method for valuing the customer relationships, and the lost income method for valuing the non-compete agreements and the licensing agreement. The goodwill acquired is not deductible for tax purposes.

ScarAway®
On August 28, 2015, we completed our acquisition of ScarAway®, a leading U.S. OTC scar management brand portfolio comprised of five products, from Enaltus, LLC, for $26.7 million in cash. This acquisition served as our entry into the niche branded OTC business in the U.S. Operating results attributable to ScarAway® are included in the CHCA segment. The intangible assets acquired included a trademark with a 25-year useful life, non-compete agreements with a four-year useful life, developed product technology with an eight-year useful life, and customer relationships with a 15-year useful life. We utilized the relief from royalty method for valuing the trademark and developed product technology, the multi-period excess earnings method for valuing the customer relationships, and the lost income method for valuing the non-compete agreements. The goodwill acquired is deductible for tax purposes.

GlaxoSmithKlineConsumer Healthcare Product Portfolio
On August 28, 2015, we completed our acquisition of a portfolio of well-established OTC brands from GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare (“GSK Products”). This acquisition further leveraged our European market share and expanded our product offerings. The assets were purchased through an all-cash transaction valued at €200.0 million ($223.6 million). Operating results attributable to the acquired GSK Products are included primarily in the CHCI segment. The intangible assets acquired included trademarks with a 20-year useful life and customer relationships with a 15-year useful life. We utilized the relief from royalty method for valuing the trademarks and the multi-period excess earnings method for valuing the customer relationships. The goodwill acquired is deductible for tax purposes.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 2




Purchase Price Allocation of Acquisitions Completed During the Six Months Ended December 31, 2015

The Entocort®, Naturwohl, ScarAway®, GSK Products, and eight product development acquisitions opening balance sheets are final.The below table indicates the purchase price allocations for acquisitions completed during the six months ended December 31, 2015(in millions):

 
Entocort®
 Naturwohl 
ScarAway®
 GSK Products 
All Other(1)
Purchase price paid$380.2
 $150.4
 $26.7
 $223.6
 $15.3
Contingent consideration
 
 
 
 13.9
Total purchase consideration$380.2
 $150.4
 $26.7
 $223.6
 $29.2
          
Assets acquired:         
Cash and cash equivalents$
 $4.6
 $
 $
 $
Accounts receivable
 3.3
 
 
 
Inventories0.2
 1.5
 1.0
 
 
Goodwill
 61.0
 3.5
 32.6
 
Definite-lived intangibles:
         
Distribution and license agreements, supply agreements$
 $21.4
 $
 $
 $
Developed product technology, formulations, and product rights380.0
 
 0.5
 
 
Customer relationships and distribution networks
 25.9
 9.8
 61.5
 
Trademarks, trade names, and brands
 64.2
 11.4
 129.5
 
Non-compete agreements
 0.3
 0.5
 
 
Indefinite-lived intangibles:
         
In-process research and development$
 $
 $
 $
 $29.2
Total intangible assets$380.0
 $111.8
 $22.2
 $191.0
 $29.2
Total assets$380.2
 $182.2
 $26.7
 $223.6
 $29.2
Liabilities assumed:         
Accounts payable$
 $2.8
 $
 $
 $
Accrued liabilities
 1.6
 
 
 
Net deferred income tax liabilities
 27.4
 
 
 
Total liabilities$
 $31.8
 $
 $
 $
Net assets acquired$380.2
 $150.4
 $26.7
 $223.6
 $29.2

(1)
Consists of eight product development acquisitions in our CHCA, CHCI and RX segments.

Acquisitions Completed During the Year Ended June 27, 2015

Gelcaps Exportadora de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

On May 12, 2015, we completed our acquisition of 100% of Gelcaps Exportadora de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. ("Gelcaps"), the Mexican operations of Durham, North Carolina-based Patheon Inc., for $37.9 million in cash. The acquisition added softgel manufacturing technology to our supply chain capabilities and broadened our presence, product portfolio, and customer network in Mexico. Operating results attributable to Gelcaps are included in the CHCA segment. The intangible assets acquired included a trademark with a 25-year useful life and customer relationships with a 20-year useful life. We utilized the relief from royalty method for valuing the trademark and the multi-period excess earnings method for valuing the customer relationships.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 2



Based on valuation estimates utilizing the comparative sales method, a step-up in the value of inventory of $0.6 million was recorded in the opening balance sheet, which was charged to cost of goods sold during the three months ended June 27, 2015. In addition, property, plant and equipment was written up by $0.9 million to its estimated fair market value based on a valuation method that included both the cost and market approaches. This additional step-up in value is being depreciated over the estimated remaining useful lives of the assets. The goodwill recorded is not deductible for tax purposes.

Omega Pharma Invest N.V.

On March 30, 2015, we completed our acquisition of Omega, a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Belgium. Omega was a leading European OTC company and is providing us several key benefits, including advancing our growth strategy outside the U.S. by providing access across a larger global platform with critical mass in key European countries, establishing commercial infrastructure in the high barrier-to-entry European OTC marketplace, strengthening our product portfolio while enhancing scale and distribution, and expanding our international management presence.

We purchased95.77% of the issued and outstanding share capital of Omega (685,348,257 shares) from Alychlo N.V. (“Alychlo”) and Holdco I BE N.V. (together with Alychlo, the “Sellers”), limited liability companies incorporated under the laws of Belgium, under the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement dated November 6, 2014 (the "Share Purchase Agreement"). Omega holds the remaining 30,243,983 shares as treasury shares.

The acquisition was a cash and stock transaction made up of the following consideration (in millions except per share data):
Perrigo ordinary shares issued 5.4
Perrigo per share price at transaction close on March 30, 2015 $167.64
Total value of Perrigo ordinary shares issued $904.9
Cash consideration 2,078.3
Total consideration $2,983.2

The cash consideration shown in the above table was financed by a combination of debt and equity. We issued $1.6 billion of debt and issued 6.8 million ordinary shares, which raised $999.3 million, net of issuance costs (refer to Note 10).

The Sellers agreed to indemnify us for certain potential future losses. The Sellers’ indemnification and other obligations to us under the Share Purchase Agreement are secured by up to €120.9 million ($127.2 million as of December 31, 2017) in cash that has been escrowed and 1.08 million of our ordinary shares, which are both being held in escrow to secure such obligations. Under the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement, Alychlo and its affiliates are subject to a three-year non-compete in Europe, and the Sellers are subject to a two-year non-solicit, in each case subject to certain exceptions. The Share Purchase Agreement contains other customary representations, warranties, and covenants of the parties, thereto. On December 16, 2016, we commenced an arbitral claim against the Sellers in connection with the Sellers' obligations to us under the Share Purchase Agreement. The fact of the claim has been made public, but the proceedings otherwise remain confidential. The Sellers deny liability (refer to Note 16 for additional information).

The operating results attributable to Omega are included in the CHCI segment. We incurred general transaction costs (legal, banking and other professional fees), financing fees, and debt extinguishment charges in connection with the Omega acquisition. The amounts recorded were not allocated to a reporting segment. The table below details the acquisition costs, as well as losses on hedging activities associated with the acquisition purchase price, and where they were recorded (in millions):

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 2



 Year Ended
Line itemJune 27,
2015
Administration$29.7
Interest expense, net23.7
Other expense, net324.0
Loss on extinguishment of debt9.6
Total acquisition-related costs$387.0

See Note 8 - Discontinued Operations for further details on losses on the Omega-related hedging activities shown above in Other expense, net, and Note 10 for details on the loss on extinguishment of debt.

We acquired the following intangible assets: indefinite-lived brands, a definite-lived trade name with an eight-year useful life, definite-lived brands with a 22-year useful life, a distribution network with a 21-year useful life, and developed product technology with useful lives ranging from fourto 13 years. We also recorded goodwill, which is not deductible for tax purposes and represents the value we assigned to the expected synergies described above, in our CHCI segment. We utilized the multi-period excess earnings method to value the indefinite-lived brands, the definite-lived brands, and distribution network. We utilized the relief from royalty method to value the developed product technology and definite-lived trade name. The weighted-average useful life of all intangible assets acquired is 20.6 years (refer to Note 3 for further detail on Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets).

Based on valuation estimates utilizing the comparative sales method, a step-up in the value of inventory of $15.1 million was recorded in the opening balance sheet and was charged to cost of goods sold during the three months ended June 27, 2015. In addition, property, plant and equipment were written up $41.5 million to their estimated fair market value based on a valuation method that included both the cost and market approaches. This additional step-up in value is being depreciated over the estimated remaining useful livessale of the assets. Additionally, the fair value of the debt assumedon the date of acquisition exceeded par value by $101.9 million, which was recorded as part of the carrying value of the underlying debt and will be amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining terms of the respective debt instruments (refer to Note 10 for more information on the debt we assumed from Omega and our subsequent payments on the debt).RX business.

Lumara Health, Inc.

On October 31, 2014, we acquired a portfolio of women's healthcare products from Lumara Health, Inc., ("Lumara") a privately-held, Chesterfield, Missouri-based specialty pharmaceutical company, for $83.0 million in cash. The acquisition of this portfolio further expanded our women's healthcare product offerings. Operating results attributable to the acquired Lumara products are included in the RX segment. The intangible assets acquired consisted of three product formulations with useful lives ranging from eight to 12 years. The assets were valued utilizing the multi-period excess earnings method.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 2



Purchase Price Allocation of Acquisitions Completed During the Year Ended June 27, 2015
The Gelcaps, Omega, and Lumara opening balance sheets are final. Measurement period adjustments to the Gelcaps opening balance sheet were not material; there were no measurement period adjustments to the Lumara opening balance sheet. Measurement period adjustment made to the Omega opening balance sheet are shown below.
 June 27,
2015
 Measurement Period Adjustments December 31,
2015
Accounts receivable$227.4
 $(4.5) $222.9
Inventories$288.9
 $(11.9) $277.0
Property, plant and equipment, net$121.2
 $9.6
 $130.8
Goodwill$1,269.6
 $419.1
 $1,688.7
Intangible assets:     
Developed product technology, formulations, and product rights$36.9
 $(5.5) $31.4
Customer relationships and distribution networks1,342.7
 (286.4) 1,056.3
Definite-lived trademarks, trade names, and brands282.0
 5.5
 287.5
Indefinite-lived trademarks, trade names, and brands2,145.2
 (141.4) 2,003.8
Total intangible assets$3,806.8
 $(427.8) $3,379.0
Accrued liabilities$50.0
 $(0.7) $49.3
Net deferred income tax liabilities$771.1
 $14.4
 $785.5
Other non-current liabilities$88.9
 $(29.0) $59.9

The measurement period changes in the Omega purchase accounting were due primarily to refinements in the underlying valuation assumptions for the intangible assets, including updates to the allocations of projected cash flows to the intangible assets and the related jurisdictional tax rates that were used in those projections, the accounting of intangible assets as definite-lived versus indefinite-lived assets, and finalization of the related deferred taxes. Valuation adjustments made during the measurement period resulted in a $10.2 million reduction of amortization expense (recorded primarily in Selling expense) for the six months ended December 31, 2015 that were related to the year ended June 27, 2015 (refer to Note 3 for further detail on Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets).


Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 2



The below table indicates the purchase price allocation for acquisitions completed during the year ended June 27, 2015 (in millions):
 Gelcaps Omega Lumara
Total purchase consideration$37.9
 $2,983.2
 $83.0
Assets acquired:     
Cash and cash equivalents$4.6
 $14.7
 $
Accounts receivable7.3
 222.9
 2.9
Inventories7.2
 277.0
 1.5
Prepaid expenses and other current assets2.1
 51.2
 0.4
Property, plant and equipment, net6.0
 130.8
 0.1
Goodwill6.0
 1,688.7
 
Definite-lived intangibles:
     
Developed product technology, formulations, and product rights$
 $31.4
 $82.0
Customer relationships and distribution networks6.6
 1,056.3
 
Trademarks, trade names, and brands
 287.5
 
Indefinite-lived intangibles:
     
Trademarks, trade names, and brands4.4
 2,003.8
 
Total intangible assets$11.0
 $3,379.0
 $82.0
Other non-current assets0.4
 2.4
 
Total assets$44.6
 $5,766.7
 $86.9
Liabilities assumed:     
Accounts payable$3.3
 $225.0
 $
Short-term debt
 112.6
 
Accrued liabilities1.6
 49.3
 3.9
Payroll and related taxes
 51.3
 
Accrued customer programs
 28.9
 
Long-term debt
 1,471.0
 
Net deferred income tax liabilities1.4
 785.5
 
Other non-current liabilities0.4
 59.9
 
Total liabilities$6.7
 $2,783.5
 $3.9
Net assets acquired$37.9
 $2,983.2
 $83.0


Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 2



Actual and Unaudited Pro Forma Impact of Acquisitions

Our Consolidated Financial Statements include operating results from the Tretinoin Products, Entocort®, Naturwohl, GSK Products, ScarAway®, Omega, Gelcaps, and Lumara® acquisitions as well as from three small product acquisitions, from the date of each acquisition through December 31, 2017. Net sales and operating income attributable to the Tretinoin Products and two small product acquisitions included in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 totaled $85.3 million and $45.1 million, respectively. Net sales and operating income attributable to the Entocort®, Naturwohl, ScarAway®, and GSK acquisitions included in our financial statements for the six months ended December 31, 2015 totaled $51.0 million and $20.6 million, respectively. Net sales and operating income attributable to the Omega, Gelcaps, and Lumara acquisitions included in our financial statements for the year ended June 27, 2015 totaled $418.2 million and $18.9 million, respectively.

The following unaudited pro forma information gives effect to the Tretinoin Products, Entocort®, Naturwohl, GSK Products, ScarAway®, Omega, Gelcaps, and Lumara acquisitions, as well as two small product acquisitions, as if the acquisitions had occurred on the first day of the year ended ended June 27, 2015 and had been included in our Results of Operations for all periods presented thereafter (in millions):

 Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
(Unaudited)December 31, 2016 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
Net sales$5,288.6
 $2,748.8
 $5,682.5
Net income (loss)$(4,011.0) $81.0
 $250.2

The historical consolidated financial information of Perrigo, and the Tretinoin Products, Entocort®, Naturwohl, GSK Products, and ScarAway®, Omega, Gelcaps, and Lumara® acquisitions and the two small product acquisitions, has been adjusted in the pro forma information to give effect to pro forma events that are (1) directly attributable to the transactions, (2) factually supportable and (3) expected to have a continuing impact on combined results. In order to reflect the occurrence of the acquisitions on the first day of the year ended June 27, 2015 as required, the unaudited pro forma results include adjustments to reflect the incremental amortization expense to be incurred based on the current values of each acquisition's identifiable intangible and tangible assets, along with the reclassification of acquisition-related costs from the period ended December 31, 2016 to the period ended June 27, 2015. The unaudited pro forma results do not reflect future events that have occurred or may occur after the acquisitions.


Divestitures Completed During the Year Ended December 31, 20172020


Rosemont Pharmaceuticals Business

On January 3, 2017, we sold certain ANDAs for $15.0 million to a third party, which was recorded as a gain in Other operating income on the Consolidated Statements of Operations in our RX segment.

On February 1, 2017, we completed the sale of the animal health pet treats plant fixed assets within our CHCA segment, which were previously classified as held-for sale. We received $7.7 million in proceeds, which resulted in an immaterial loss.

On April 6, 2017,June 19, 2020, we completed the sale of our India APIU.K.-based Rosemont Pharmaceuticals business, a generic prescription pharmaceuticals manufacturer focused on liquid medicines, to Strides Shasun Limited. We received $22.2a U.K.-headquartered private equity firm for cash consideration of £155.6 million of proceeds, inclusive of an estimated working capital adjustment, which(approximately $195.0 million). The sale resulted in an immaterial gaina pre-tax loss of $21.1 million recorded in our CSCI segment in Other segment. Prior to closing the sale, we determined that the carrying value of the India API business exceeded its fair value less the cost to sell, resulting in an impairment charge of $35.3 million, which was recorded in Impairment charges(income) expense, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations forOperations. The charge included professional fees and a $46.4 million write-off of foreign currency translation adjustment from Accumulated other comprehensive income.

Divestitures During the year endedYear Ended December 31, 2016.2019


Perrigo Company plc - Item 8Animal Health Business
Note 2



On August 25, 2017,July 8, 2019, we completed the sale of our Russiananimal health business which was previously classified as held-for-sale, to Alvogen Pharma LLC. The total sale price was €12.7PetIQ for cash consideration of $182.5 million, ($15.1 million), inclusive of an estimated working capital adjustment, which resulted in an immateriala pre-tax gain of $71.7 million recorded in our CHCI segment. Prior to closing the sale, we determined that the carrying value of the Russian business exceeded its fair value less the cost to sell, resultingCSCA segment in an impairment charge of $3.7 million, which was recorded in Impairment chargesOther (income) expense, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended July 1, 2017.Operations.


On November 21, 2017, we completed the sale of our Israel API business, which was previously classified as held-for-sale, to SK Capital for a sale price of $110.0 million, which resulted in an immaterial gain recorded in our Other segment in Other expense (Income), net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
103

As a result of the sale, we recognized a guarantee liability (refer to Note 6). Per the agreement, we will be reimbursed for tax receivables for tax years prior to closing and will need to reimburse SK Capital for the settlement of any uncertain tax liability positions for tax years prior to closing. In addition, after closing and going forward, the Israel API business, will be assessed by and liable to the Israel Tax Authority ("ITA") for any audit findings. We are no longer the primary obligor on the liabilities transferred to SK Capital on November 21, 2017, however, we have provided a guarantee on certain obligations that were recorded at a fair value of $13.8 million, with a maximum possible payout of $34.9 million.

On December 20, 2017, we completed the sale of one of the Development-Stage Rx Products to an ophthalmic pharmaceutical company. We will potentially receive the following consideration: (1) a milestone payment of $1.5 million after the buyer achieves net sales of $25.0 million in any given calendar year; (2) a milestone payment of $5.0 million after the buyer achieves $50.0 million in net sales in any given year; and (3) royalty payments of 2.5% of all net sales of the product from the date of the first commercial sales of the product and continuing until market entry of a generic equivalent of the product.

Divestitures Completed During the Year Ended December 31, 2016

On August 5, 2016, we completed the sale of our U.S. Vitamins, Minerals, and Supplements ("VMS") business within our CHCA segment to International Vitamins Corporation ("IVC") for $61.8 million inclusive of an estimated working capital adjustment. Prior to closing the sale, we determined that the carrying value of the VMS business exceeded its fair value less the cost to sell, resulting in an impairment charge of $6.2 million, which was recorded in Impairment charges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.


Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 34



NOTE 34 - GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
    
Goodwill

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, by reportable segment, were as follows (in millions):
CSCA(1)
CSCI(2)
Total
Balance at December 31, 2019$1,899.1 $1,203.7 $3,102.8 
Business divestitures— (115.6)(115.6)
Business acquisitions14.8 7.3 22.1 
Currency translation adjustments1.5 83.3 84.8 
Purchase accounting adjustments(10.4)12.0 1.6 
Balance at December 31, 20201,905.0 1,190.7 3,095.7 
Impairments(6.1)(10.0)(16.1)
Purchase accounting adjustments2.4 (2.4)— 
Currency translation adjustments1.1 (81.3)(80.2)
Balance at December 31, 2021$1,902.4 $1,097.0 $2,999.4 
 CHCA CHCI RX Specialty Sciences Other Total
Balance at June 27, 2015$1,817.2
 $1,530.2
 $1,086.0
 $199.6
 $88.2
 $4,721.2
Business acquisitions9.7
 87.4
 
 
 
 97.1
Changes in assets held-for-sale(13.0) 
 
 
 (14.6) (27.6)
Currency translation adjustments(0.8) (53.3) (1.9) 
 (2.1) (58.1)
Purchase accounting adjustments1.2
 418.9
 
 
 
 420.1
Balance at December 31, 20151,814.3
 1,983.2
 1,084.1
 199.6
 71.5
 5,152.7
Business acquisitions
 
 1.7
 
 
 1.7
Changes in assets held-for-sale4.5
 
 
 
 9.0
 13.5
Impairments(24.5) (868.4) 
 (199.6) 
 (1,092.5)
Currency translation adjustments(0.9) (27.5) 0.8
 
 0.9
 (26.7)
Purchase accounting adjustments17.2
 (16.5) 
 
 
 0.7
Balance at December 31, 20161,810.6
 1,070.8
 1,086.6
 
 81.4
 4,049.4
Re-allocation of goodwill(1)
35.3
 
 27.7
 
 (63.0) 
Business divestitures
 (4.1) 
 
 (26.4) (30.5)
Currency translation adjustments1.5
 139.0
 8.0
 
 8.0
 156.5
Balance at December 31, 2017$1,847.4
 $1,205.7
 $1,122.3
 $
 $
 $4,175.4


(1) We had accumulated goodwill impairments of $6.1 as of December 31, 2021.
(1) Certain cash flow associated with(2) We had accumulated goodwill impairments of $878.4 as of December 31, 2021 and $868.4 million as of December 31, 2020.


CSCA Reporting Unit Goodwill

On May 18, 2021, we announced a definitive agreement to sell our Mexico and Brazil-based OTC businesses ("Latin American businesses"), both within our CSCA segment, to Advent International. As a result, we prepared a goodwill impairment test. We determined the APIcarrying value of this business were retained. We performed a relativeexceeded the fair value allocationand recorded an impairment of $6.1 million within our CSCA segment during the business retainedthree months ended July 3, 2021 (refer to Note 7 and allocated it amongNote 9).

CSCI Reporting Unit Goodwill

During the two segments where the business was allocated.

The increase in goodwill in the year ended December 31, 2017 was due primarily to foreign currency translation adjustments. The decrease in goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2016 was due primarily to impairment charges recorded in the CHCI and Specialty Sciences segments as discussed below. The increase in goodwill in the sixthree months ended December 31, 2015 was due primarily to purchase accounting adjustments to2021, we reorganized the Omega acquisition, as well asreporting structure within our CSCI segment following the Naturwohl and GSK acquisitions recorded in the CHCI segment (refer to Note 2).

As required by our policy, we tested goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of 2017 (refer to Note 1). We determined the fair value of eachintegration of our reporting units exceeded their net book values.into a new operating structure. The fair values ofgoodwill previously included in the BCH,Oral Care International, CSC UK AUS and Animal HealthAustralia, and BCS reporting units was combined into a single CSCI reporting unit. Impairment tests were each less than 25.0% higher than their respective net book values as ofperformed for the annual assessment date. As a result, theselegacy reporting units are inherently at a higher riskprior to the reorganization and for future impairments if they experience deteriorationthe CSCI reporting unit immediately after the reorganization.

During the three months ended June 27, 2020, our Branded Consumer Self-care ("BCS") reporting unit included in business performance or market multiples, or increases in discount rates. These reporting units had the following remaining goodwill balances as of December 31, 2017 (in millions):
Reporting Unit Goodwill Remaining in Reporting Unit Segment Fair Value in excess of Carrying Value
BCH $1,026.0
 CHCI 6.6%
Animal Health $178.9
 CHCA 23.6%
UK AUS $53.1
 CHCI 18.3%

Subsequently, at the end of the fourth quarter of 2017, the Animal Health reporting unitCSCI segment had an indication of potential impairment resultingwhich was driven by a decrease in forecasted cash flows in the second half of 2020 related to impacts from the termination of a supply agreement.COVID-19 pandemic. We prepared an impairment test as of December 31, 2017June 27, 2020 and determined that the fair value of the Animal HealthBCS reporting unit continued to exceedexceeded net book value by 8.9%. The 8.9% margin was lowerless than the excess fair value over carrying value of 23.6% that was estimated10%, consistent with prior annual impairment test as of October 1, 2017. Therefore, while2019. There was no indication of impairment was recorded in 2017,during the supply agreement termination increased the riskremaining six months of future impairment in this reporting unit.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 3



The discounted cash flow forecasts used for these reporting units in goodwill impairment testing include assumptions about future activity levels in both the near term and longer-term. If growth in these reporting units is lower than expected, we may experience deterioration in our cash flow forecasts that may indicate goodwill in the reporting units may be impaired in future impairment tests. We continue to monitor the progress and assess the reporting units for potential impairment should impairment indicators arise, as applicable, and at least annuallyDecember 31, 2020, nor during our fourth quarter impairment testing.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we identified indicators of goodwill impairment for certain of2021.

In conjunction with our reporting units, which required us to complete interim goodwill impairment testing (refer to Note 1 for our impairment process). Step one of the goodwillannual impairment test, involves determining the fair value of the reporting unit using a discounted cash flow technique and comparing it to the reporting unit’s carrying value. The main assumptions supporting the cash flow projections used to determine the reporting units’ fair value include revenue growth based on product line extensions, product life cycle strategies, and geographical expansion within the markets in which the reporting unit distributes products, gross margins consistent with historical trends, and advertising and promotion investments largely consistent with the reporting unit's growth plans. If a reporting unit does not pass step one of the goodwill impairment test, step two is completed. The second step of the goodwill impairment test requires that we determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill, which involves determining the value of the reporting unit’s individual assets and liabilities. If the reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its book value, an impairment charge is recorded.
Duringduring the three months ended April 2, 2016,December 31, 2021, we identified indicators ofrecorded an impairment forcharge in our Branded Consumer Healthcare - Rest of World ("BCH-ROW")Oral Care International reporting unit which comprises primarily operations attributable to the Omega acquisition in all geographic regions except for Belgium. The primary impairment indicators included the decline inwithin our 2016 performance expectations and a reduction in our long-range revenue growth forecast. BCH-ROW did not pass step oneCSCI segment of goodwill impairment testing.$10.0 million. The change in fair value from previous estimates was due primarilydriven by reduced projections of future cash flows resulting from increased costs throughout the global supply chain (refer to the changes in the market and performance of the brands such that the evaluation of brand prioritization and product extensions or launches in new regions are being more focused to maximize the potential of all brands in the segment's portfolio. Based on our evaluation and initial estimates of the fair values of the assets and liabilities and the deficit of the fair value when compared to the related book value, we recorded $130.5 million in impairment charges on the Consolidated Statement of Operations within our CHCI segment.
During the three months ended October 1, 2016, we identified additional indicators of goodwill impairment in both our BCH-ROW and our Branded Consumer Healthcare - Belgium ("BCH-Belgium"Note 7) reporting units. With respect to both reporting units, the primary impairment indicators included an additional decline in our 2016 performance expectations for the remainder of the year and a reduction in our long-range revenue growth and margin forecasts due to the factors outlined below. Neither the BCH-ROW nor the BCH-Belgium reporting units passed step one of goodwill impairment testing.
As it relates to the BCH-ROW reporting unit, the changes in fair value from previous estimates were due primarily to (1) changes in the market and performance of certain brands due to moderated new product launch assumptions, (2) execution of certain key product strategies falling short of expectations causing a reduction to baseline forecast models in France, Germany and Italy and (3) certain macro-economic factors continuing to impact the business more than expected in France, Russia and Turkey in addition to unfavorable foreign currency impacts experienced (primarily in the UK related to Brexit.) As it relates to the BCH-Belgium reporting unit, the changes in fair value from previous estimates were due to changes in the forecasts as a result of a reduction in volume with a major wholesaler due to factors consistent with those outlined for the BCH-ROW reporting unit.
Based on our estimates of the fair values of the assets and liabilities and the deficit of the fair value when compared to the related book value, we recorded an impairment charge of $675.6 million related to the BCH-ROW reporting unit and $62.3 million related to the BCH-Belgium reporting unit on the Consolidated Statement of Operations within our CHCI segment.

During the three months ended December 31, 2016, we identified indicators of goodwill impairment in the BCH-Belgium reporting unit related to the early termination of a distribution agreement. We prepared a goodwill impairment test as of December 3, 2016, which was the end of the month in which the impairment indicator.
104

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 34



occurred. Step one of the goodwill impairment test indicated that the fair value of the BCH-Belgium reporting unit as greater than its net book value. As a result, we did not perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test.

During the three months ended December 31, 2016, we identified indicators of goodwill impairment in the Animal Health reporting unit related to changes in the market and performance of certain brands. We prepared a goodwill impairment test as of October 2, 2016 as part of our annual goodwill impairment testing process. Step one of the goodwill impairment test indicated that the fair value of the Animal Health reporting unit was below its net book value. As a result, we performed the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of impairment. We concluded that Animal Health goodwill was impaired by $24.5 million, which we recorded in Impairment charges on the Consolidated Statement of Operations within our CHCA segment.

During the three months ended December 31, 2016, we identified indicators of goodwill impairment in the Specialty Sciences reporting unit related to our decision to review strategic alternatives for the Tysabri® financial asset. As a result of the impairment indicators, we prepared a goodwill impairment test as of December 31, 2016. Step one of the goodwill impairment test indicated that the fair value of the Specialty Sciences reporting unit was below its net book value. As a result, we initiated the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of impairment. We concluded that the goodwill was fully impaired and recorded an impairment of $199.6 million in Impairment charges on the Consolidated Statement of Operations within our Specialty Sciences segment.

No impairment charges were recorded as a result of the annual goodwill impairment testing during the six months ended December 31, 2015. During the year ended June 27, 2015, we performed our annual goodwill impairment testing, which indicated that our CHCA Mexico reporting unit's goodwill fair value was below its net book value as of March 28, 2015. As a result, we initiated the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of impairment. We concluded that the goodwill was fully impaired and recorded an impairment of $6.8 million in the CHCA segment during the year ended June 27, 2015 in Impairment charges. No other segments were affected by this impairment charge.


Intangible Assets

Other intangible assets and the related accumulated amortization consisted of the following (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Gross 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Gross 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Gross Accumulated Amortization GrossAccumulated
Amortization
GrossAccumulated
Amortization
Definite-lived intangibles:
           
Distribution and license agreements, supply agreements$311.2
 $169.8
 $305.6
 $120.4
 $242.4
 $77.7
Indefinite-lived intangibles:Indefinite-lived intangibles:
Trademarks, trade names, and brandsTrademarks, trade names, and brands$3.5 $— $4.3 $— 
In-process research and developmentIn-process research and development1.8 — 2.7 — 
Total indefinite-lived intangiblesTotal indefinite-lived intangibles$5.3 $— $7.0 $— 
Definite-lived intangibles:Definite-lived intangibles:
Distribution and license agreements and supply agreementsDistribution and license agreements and supply agreements$73.2 $56.9 $74.8 $55.4 
Developed product technology, formulations, and product rights1,358.4
 598.7
 1,418.1
 526.0
 1,387.6
 426.0
Developed product technology, formulations, and product rights300.2 191.4 303.3 177.3 
Customer relationships and distribution networks1,642.0
 460.6
 1,489.9
 307.5
 1,520.7
 193.0
Customer relationships and distribution networks1,820.7 887.8 1,920.5 823.7 
Trademarks, trade names, and brands1,335.4
 129.5
 1,189.3
 55.3
 539.4
 22.8
Trademarks, trade names, and brands1,482.3 394.2 1,581.5 342.2 
Non-compete agreements14.7
 12.6
 14.3
 11.2
 15.2
 12.7
Non-compete agreements2.1 2.1 2.9 2.9 
Total definite-lived intangibles$4,661.7
 $1,371.2
 $4,417.2
 $1,020.4
 $3,705.3
 $732.2
Total definite-lived intangibles$3,678.5 $1,532.4 $3,883.0 $1,401.5 
Indefinite-lived intangibles:
           
Trademarks, trade names, and brands$52.1
 $
 $50.5
 $
 $1,868.1
 $
In-process research and development38.2
 
 64.0
 
 48.2
 
Total indefinite-lived intangibles$90.3
 $
 $114.5
 $
 $1,916.3
 $
Total other intangible assets$4,752.0
 $1,371.2
 $4,531.7
 $1,020.4
 $5,621.6
 $732.2
Total intangible assetsTotal intangible assets$3,683.8 $1,532.4 $3,890.0 $1,401.5 
Certain intangible assets are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollars;dollar; therefore, their gross and net carrying values are subject to foreign currency movements.

The increase in gross amortizable intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2017 was due primarily to foreign currency translation. The decrease in gross amortizable intangible assets during the year ended
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 3


December 31, 2016 was due to the reclassification of Omega indefinite-lived assets to definite-lived assets as described below, offset by current year impairments taken as described below. The increase during the six months ended December 31, 2015 was due to the Entocort®, GSK, Naturwohl, and ScarAway® acquisitions, offset partially by purchase price adjustments to the Omega intangible assets (refer to Note 2).

Intangible asset impairments taken are as follows (in millions):
 Year Ended Six Months Ended
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
 Definite-Lived Intangible Assets IPR&D Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets Definite-Lived Intangible Assets IPR&D Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
CHCA$
 $
 $0.4
 $
 $
 $
CHCI
 1.1
 849.1
 321.4
 3.5
 185.1
RX19.7
 11.6
 
 342.2
 
 
Other
 
 
 2.0
 
 
 $19.7
 $12.7
 $849.5
 $665.6
 $3.5
 $185.1

During the three months ended July 1, 2017, we identified impairment indicators for our Lumara Health, Inc. ("Lumara") product assets. The primary impairment indicators included the decline in our 2017 performance expectations and a reduction in our long-range revenue growth forecast. The assessment utilized the multi-period excess earnings method to determine fair value and resulted in an impairment charge of $18.5 million in Impairment charges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations within our RX segment, which represented the difference between the carrying amount of the intangible assets and their estimated fair value.

During the three months ended April 2, 2016, we identified indicators of impairment associated with certain indefinite-lived intangible assets acquired in conjunction with the Omega acquisition. The primary impairment indicators included the decline in our 2016 performance expectations and a reduction in our long-range revenue growth forecast. The assessment utilized the excess earnings method to determine fair value and resulted in an impairment charge of $273.4 million in Impairment charges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations within our CHCI segment, which represented the difference between the carrying amount of the intangible assets and their estimated fair value. The change in fair value from previous estimates was due primarily to the changes in the market and performance of the brands such that the evaluation of brand prioritization and product extensions or launches in new regions are being more focused to maximize the potential of all brands in the segment's portfolio. The main assumptions supporting the fair value of these assets and cash flow projections included revenue growth based on product line extensions, product life cycle strategies, geographical expansion within the markets in which the CHCI segment distributes products, gross margins consistent with historical trends, and advertising and promotion investments largely consistent with the segment's growth plans.

During the three months ended October 1, 2016, we identified additional indicators of impairment associated with certain indefinite-lived and definite-lived intangible brand category assets acquired in conjunction with the Omega acquisition. The primary impairment indicators are discussed above in goodwill. The assessment of the indefinite-lived assets utilized the excess earnings method to determine fair value and resulted in an impairment charge of $575.7 million. With regards to definite-lived assets, it was determined that the carrying value of one asset group was not recoverable based on an assessment of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group. Given this, the excess earnings method was utilized to determine fair value of the definite-lived asset and resulted in an impairment charge of $290.9 million. Both charges, which represented the difference between the carrying amount of the intangible assets and their estimated fair value, were recorded in Impairment charges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations within our CHCI segment. The main assumptions supporting the fair value of these assets and cash flow projections are included in the goodwill discussions above.

During the three months ended December 31, 2016, we identified impairment indicators in our Entocort® product assets which related to the entrance of new market competition and resulting negative impacts on sales volume and pricing. Utilizing a multi-period excess earnings method, we determined that the Entocort® product
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 3


assets were impaired by $342.2 million. We recorded this impairment in Impairment charges on the Consolidated Statement of Operations within our RX segment.

During the three months ended December 31, 2016, we identified impairment indicators in certain definite-lived intangible assets, including trademarks and trade names related to our Herron products that we originally acquired through the acquisition of Aspen. After determining the assets were impaired, we utilized the relief from royalty method to quantify the impairment, resulting in a $30.5 million impairment. We recorded these impairments in Impairment charges on the Consolidated Statement of Operations within our CHCI segment.

During our impairment testing for the six months ended December 31, 2015, we identified an impairment of certain indefinite-lived intangible assets based on management’s expectations of the prospects for future revenues, profits, and cash flows associated with these assets. The indefinite-lived intangible assets were purchased in conjunction with the Omega acquisition and are included in the CHCI segment. The assessment utilized the excess earnings method to determine fair value and resulted in an impairment charge of $185.1 million, which represents the difference between the carrying amount of the intangible assets and their estimated fair value. The amount was recorded in Impairment charges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations within the CHCI segment. The primary assumptions supporting the fair value of these assets and cash flow projections assume modest revenue growth based on product line extensions, product life cycle strategies, and geographical expansion within the markets in which the CHCI segment currently distributes products, and gross margins and advertising and promotion investments largely consistent with historical trends.

No material impairment charges were recorded as a result of the annual intangible asset impairment testing during the year endedJune 27, 2015.

We recorded an impairment charge of $12.7 million and $3.5 million on certain IPR&D assets during the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, due to changes in the projected development and regulatory timelines for various projects, we also recorded a decrease in the contingent consideration liability associated with certain IPR&D assets in Other operating income on the Consolidated Statements of Operations (refer to Note 6).

In addition, due to reprioritization of certain brands in the CHCI segment and change in performance expectations for the cough/cold/allergy, anti-parasite, personal care, lifestyle, and natural health brands, we reclassified $364.5 million and $674.4 million of indefinite-lived assets to definite-lived assets with useful lives of 20 years, which we began amortizing during the second and third quarters of 2016, respectively.


The remaining weighted-average useful life for our amortizable intangible assets by asset class at December 31, 20172021 was as follows:
Amortizable Intangible Asset CategoryRemaining Weighted-Average Useful Life (Years)
Distribution and license agreements and supply agreements7
Developed product technology, formulations, and product rights128
Customer relationships and distribution networks1715
Trademarks, trade names, and brands2015
Non-compete agreements2


We recorded amortization expense of $349.6$210.0 million, $356.8$212.2 million, $128.6 million, $174.5and $219.6 million during the years ended December 31, 20172021, December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2016, the six months ended December 31, 2015, and the year ended June 27, 2015,2019, respectively. The amortization expense in the year ended December 31, 2017 remained relatively flat. The increase in amortization expense in the year ended December 31, 2016 was due primarily to the incremental amortization expense incurred on the definite-lived intangible assets acquired from the Omega, Entocort®,and Tretinoin Products acquisitions. In addition, we incurred additional amortization in 2016 due to the previously indefinite-lived Omega brands changing classification to definite-lived during the year. The increase in amortization expense in the six months ended December 31, 2015 was due primarily to definite-lived assets
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 3


acquired from Omega. The increase in amortization expense in the year ended June 27, 2015 was due primarily to the inclusion of one quarter of amortization expense related to the intangible assets acquired from Omega.

Estimated future amortization expense includes the additional amortization related to recently acquired intangible assets subject to amortization.    Our estimated future amortization expense is as follows (in millions):
YearAmount
2022$194.9 
2023183.6 
2024174.7 
2025168.0 
2026160.2 
Thereafter1,264.7 

Licensed Pain Relief Products

During the year ended December 31, 2019, following commercial launch delays relating to certain pain relief products that we licensed from a third party, the licensor determined that it would not extend the license agreement upon expiration. As a result, we determined the asset was fully impaired and recorded an asset
105

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 4

Year Amount
2018 $341.0
2019 316.4
2020 280.8
2021 251.8
2022 222.0
Thereafter 1,878.5
impairment of $9.7 million relating to this license, which we had reported as a definite-lived intangible asset in our CSCI segment (refer to Note 7).


In-process R&D ("IPR&D")

We recorded an impairment charge of $0.9 million and $4.1 million on certain IPR&D assets during the years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2019, respectively, due to changes in the projected development and regulatory timelines for various projects.

NOTE 45 - ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FACTORING


We haveDuring the year ended December 31, 2020, we had accounts receivable factoring arrangements with non-related third-party financial institutions (the “Factors”). Pursuant to the terms of the arrangements, we sell to the Factors certain of our accounts receivable balances on a non-recourse basis for credit approved accounts. An administrative fee per invoice is charged on the gross amount of accounts receivables assigned to the Factors, and interest is calculated at the applicable EUR LIBOR rate plus a spread. TheAt December 31, 2020, the total amount factored on a non-recourse basis and excluded from accounts receivable was $27.5 million, $50.7 million, and $64.5 million at$6.9 million. During the year ended December 31, 2017, December 31, 20162021, the factoring program was discontinued and December 31, 2015, respectively.there were 0 amounts factored on a non-recourse basis and excluded from accounts receivable.


NOTE 56 - INVENTORIES


Major components of inventory were as follows (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Finished goods$549.2 $574.1 
Work in process251.9 220.4 
Raw materials219.1 264.9 
Total inventories$1,020.2 $1,059.4 

 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Finished goods$454.3
 $431.1
 $537.2
Work in process152.8
 165.7
 151.6
Raw materials199.8
 198.2
 209.9
Total inventories$806.9
 $795.0
 $898.7

NOTE 67 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
    
On January 1, 2020, we adopted ASU 2018-13: Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement ("Topic 820"). The amendments in this ASU remove disclosure requirements in Topic 820 related to the amount of, and reasons for, transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the policy for timing of transfers between levels, and the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. Additionally, Topic 820 adds disclosure requirements for the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period, and the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. We have amended certain of our quantitative Level 3 fair value measurement disclosures to add the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used.

Fair value is the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The following fair value hierarchy is used in selecting inputs, with the highest priority given to Level 1, as these are the most transparent or reliable.


Level 1:Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 1:    Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
Level 2:Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets.


Level 3:Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are not observable.

Level 2:    Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets.

Level 3:    Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are not observable.

106

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 67




The following tables summarizetable below summarizes the valuation of our financial instruments carried at fair value by the above pricing categories (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 1Level 2Level 3
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Assets:
Investment securities$0.4 $— $— $2.5 $— $— 
Foreign currency forward contracts— 5.7 — — 9.8 — 
Cross-currency swap— — — — 6.3 — 
Foreign currency option contracts— 5.0 — — — — 
Total assets$0.4 $10.7 $— $2.5 $16.1 $— 
Liabilities:
Foreign currency forward contracts$— $2.4 $— $— $7.9 $— 
Cross-currency swap— 13.8 — — — — 
Total liabilities$— $16.2 $— $— $7.9 $— 
Measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:
Assets:
Goodwill(1)
$— $— $71.7 $— $— $— 
Total assets$— $— $71.7 $— $— $— 
Liabilities
Liabilities held for sale, net(2)
$— $— $16.8 $— $— $— 
Total liabilities$— $— $16.8 $— $— $— 
    Fair Value
  Fair Value Hierarchy December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis:        
Assets:        
Investment securities Level 1 $17.0
 $38.2
 $14.9
         
Foreign currency forward contracts Level 2 $6.3
 $3.8
 $4.8
Funds associated with Israeli severance liability Level 2 16.3
 15.9
 17.2
Total level 2 assets   $22.6
 $19.7
 $22.0
         
Royalty Pharma contingent milestone payments Level 3 $134.5
 $
 $
Financial assets Level 3 
 2,350.0
 5,310.0
Total level 3 assets   $134.5
 $2,350.0
 $5,310.0
         
Liabilities:        
Interest rate swap agreements Level 2 $
 $
 $0.3
Foreign currency forward contracts Level 2 3.8
 5.0
 3.9
Total level 2 liabilities   $3.8
 $5.0
 $4.2
         
Contingent consideration Level 3 $22.0
 $69.9
 $17.9
         
Measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:        
Assets:        
Goodwill(1)
 Level 3 $
 $1,148.4
 $
Indefinite-lived intangible assets(2)
 Level 3 
 0.3
 1,031.8
Definite-lived intangible assets(3)
 Level 3 11.5
 758.0
 
Assets held for sale, net Level 3 
 18.2
 37.5
Total level 3 assets   $11.5
 $1,924.9
 $1,069.3


(1)
As of December 31, 2016, goodwill with a carrying amount of $2.2 billion was written down to its implied fair value of $1.1 billion.
(2)
As of December 31, 2016, indefinite-lived intangible assets with a carrying amount of $0.7 million were written down to a fair value of $0.3(1)     During the year ended December 31, 2021, goodwill with a carrying value of $81.7 million was written down to a fair value of $71.7 million. As of December 31, 2015, indefinite-lived intangible assets with a carrying amount of $1.2 billion were written down to a fair value of $1.0 billion.
(3)
As of December 31, 2017, definite-lived intangible assets with a carrying amount of $31.2 million were written down to a fair value of $11.5 million. As of December 31, 2016, definite-lived intangible assets with a carrying amount of $2.3 billion were written down to a fair value of $758.0 million. Included in this balance are indefinite-lived intangible assets with a fair value of $364.5 million and $674.2 million that were reclassified to definite-lived assets at April 3, 2016 and October 2, 2016, respectively.

(2)    We measured the net assets held for sale for impairment purposes and recorded a total impairment of $162.2 million, resulting in a net liability held for sale balance (refer to Note 9).

There were no transfers amongwithin Level 1, 2, and 3 fair value measurements during the years endedDecember 31, 2017, and2021 or December 31, 2016, or the six months ended December 31, 2015. Our policy regarding the recording of transfers between levels is to record any such transfers at the end of the reporting period2020 (refer to Note 710 for information on our investment securities and Note 811 for a discussion of derivatives).


Perrigo Company plc - Item 8Foreign Currency Option Contracts
Note 6

We valued the foreign currency option contract derivatives using an extension of the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model ("BSOPM") which uses the strike price and expiry as inputs obtained from the contractual agreement. Additionally, the model uses risk-free interest rates, forward currency quotes, and option volatility assumptions obtained from the observable market.


Foreign Currency Forward Contracts


The fairWe value ofthe foreign currency forward contracts is determined using abased on notional amounts, contractual rates, and observable market approach, which utilizes values for comparable derivative instruments.

Funds Associated with Israel Severance Liability

Israeli labor laws and agreements require us to pay benefits to employees dismissed or retiring under certain circumstances. Severance pay is calculated on the basis of the most recent employee salary levels and the length of employee service. Our Israeli subsidiaries also provide retirement bonuses to certain managerial employees. We make regular deposits to retirement funds and purchase insurance policies to partially fund these liabilities. The funds are determined using prices for recently traded financial instruments with similar underlying terms, as well as directly or indirectly observable inputs, such as interestcurrency exchange rates and yield curves, that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.credit risk.

Financial AssetsCross-currency Swaps


On December 18, 2013, we acquired Elan,We value the cross-currency swaps using a method which had a royalty agreement with Biogen Idec Inc. ("Biogen"), whereby Biogen conveyeddiscounts the right to receive royalties that are typically payable on sales revenue generated byexpected cash flows resulting from the sale, distribution or other usederivative. We estimate the cash flows using the contractual term of the drug Tysabri®. Pursuantderivative, including the period to the royalty agreement, we were entitled to royalty payments from Biogen based on its Tysabri® sales in all indications and geographies. We received royalties of 12% on worldwide Biogen sales of Tysabri® from December 18, 2013 through April 30, 2014. From May 1, 2014, we received royalties of 18% on annual worldwide Biogen sales of Tysabri® up to $2.0 billion and 25% on annual sales above $2.0 billion.

Prior to its divestiture on March 27, 2017, we accounted for the Tysabri® royalty stream as a financial asset and elected to use the fair value option model. We made the election to account for the Tysabri® financial asset using the fair value option as we believed this method was most appropriate for an asset that did not have a par value, a stated interest stream, or a termination date. The financial asset acquired represented a single unit of accounting. The fair value of the financial asset acquired was determined by using a discounted cash flow analysis related to the expected probability weighted future cash flows to be generated by the royalty stream. The financial asset was classified as a Level 3 asset within the fair value hierarchy, as our valuation utilized significant unobservable inputs, including industry analyst estimates for global Tysabri® sales, probability weighted as to the timing and amount of future cash flows along with certain discount rate assumptions. Cash flow forecasts included the estimated effect and timing of future competition, considering patents in effect for Tysabri® through 2024 and contractual rights to receive cash flows into perpetuity. The discounted cash flows were based upon the expected royalty stream forecasted into perpetuity using a 20-year discrete period with a declining rate terminal value. The pre-tax discount rate utilized was 7.72% and 7.83% at December 31, 2015, and June 27, 2015, respectively.

In the first quarter of 2016, a competitor's pipeline product, Ocrevus®, received breakthrough therapy designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"). Breakthrough therapy designation is granted when a drug is intended alone or in combination with one or more other drugs to treat a serious or life threatening disease or condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development. In June 2016, the FDA granted priority review with a target action date in December 2016. A priority review is a designation when the FDA will direct overall attention and resources to the evaluation of applications for drugs that, if approved, would be significant improvements in the safety or effectiveness of the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions when compared to standard applications. The product was approved late in the first quarter of 2017. The product is expected to compete with Tysabri®,maturity and we expected it to have a significant negative impact on the Tysabri® royalty stream. Industry analysts believe that, based on released clinical study information, Ocrevus® will compete favorably against Tysabri® in the relapsing, remitting multiple sclerosis market segment due to its high efficacyuse observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, and convenient dosage form.foreign exchange rate.


107

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 67




Given the new market information for Ocrevus®, we used industry analyst estimates to reduce our first ten year growth forecasts from an average growth of approximately 3.4% in the fourth calendar quarter of 2015 to an average decline of approximately minus 2.0% in the third and fourth calendar quarters of 2016. In November 2016, we announced we were evaluating strategic alternatives for the Tysabri® financial asset. As of December 31, 2016, the financial asset was adjusted based on the strategic review and sale process. These effects, combined with the change in discount rate each quarter, led to a reduction in fair value of $204.4 million, $910.8 million, $377.4 million and $1.1 billion in the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2016, respectively.

At December 31, 2015, and June 27, 2015, we performed an evaluation to assess the discount rate and general market conditions potentially affecting the fair value of our Tysabri® financial asset. As of December 31, 2015, had this discount rate increased or decreased by 0.5%, the fair value of the asset would have increased by $270.0 million or decreased by $260.0 million, respectively. As of June 27, 2015, had this discount rate increased or decreased by 0.5%, the fair value of the asset would have decreased by $260.0 million or increased by $290.0 million, respectively. The estimated fair value of the asset is subject to variation should those cash flows vary significantly from those estimates. Quarterly, we assess the expected future cash flows and to the extent such payments are greater or less than initial estimates, or the timing of such payments is materially different than the original estimates, we will adjust the estimated fair value of the asset. As of December 31, 2015, if the expected royalty cash flows used in the estimation process had increased or decreased by 5.0%, the fair value of the asset would have increased by $270.0 million or decreased by $280.0 million, respectively. As of June 27, 2015, if the expected royalty cash flows used in the estimation process had increased or decreased by 5.0%, the fair value of the asset would have increased by $280.0 million or decreased by $280.0 million, respectively. In November 2016, we announced we were evaluating strategic alternatives for the Tysabri® financial asset. As of December 31, 2016, the financial asset was adjusted based on this strategic review and sale process.

On March 27, 2017, we announced the completed divestment of our Tysabri® financial asset to Royalty Pharma for up to $2.85 billion, consisting of $2.2 billion in cash and up to $250.0 million and $400.0 million in milestone payments if the royalties on global net sales of Tysabri® that are received by Royalty Pharma meet specific thresholds in 2018 and 2020, respectively. As a result of this transaction, we transferred the entire financial asset to Royalty Pharma and recorded a $17.1 million gain during the three months ended April 1, 2017. We elected to account for the contingent milestone payments using the fair value option method, and these were recorded at an estimated fair value of $134.5 million as of December 31, 2017. We chose the fair value option as we believe it will help investors understand the potential future cash flows we may receive associated with the two contingent milestones.

The following table summarizes the change in our Consolidated Balance Sheet for the Tysabri® Financial Asset, which includes our fair value adjustment that is a Level 3 measurement under ASC 820 and is included in our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, six months ended December 31, 2015, and year ended June 27, 2015 (in millions):
 Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
Tysabri® financial asset
       
Beginning balance$2,350.0
 $5,310.0
 $5,420.0
 $5,680.0
Royalties earned
 (351.8) (167.3) (338.5)
Change in fair value
 (2,608.2) 57.3
 78.5
Divestitures(2,350.0) 
 
 
Ending balance$
 $2,350.0
 $5,310.0
 $5,420.0

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 6


Royalty Pharma Contingent Milestone Payments


We valued the contingent milestone payments using a modified Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model ("BSOPM"). Key inputs in the BSOPM are the estimated volatility and rate of return of royalties on global net sales of Tysabri® that are received by Royalty Pharma over time until payment of the contingent milestone payments is completed. Volatility and the estimated fair value of the milestones have a positive relationship such that higher volatility translates to a higher estimated fair value of the contingent milestone payments. In the valuation of contingent milestone payments performed, we assumed volatility of 30.0% and a rate of return of 8.07% as of December 31, 2017. We assess volatility and rate of return inputs quarterly by analyzing certain market volatility benchmarks and the risk associated with Royalty Pharma achieving the underlying projected royalties. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, Royalty Pharma payments from Biogen for Tysabri® sales, as defined in the agreement between the parties, did not exceed the 2020 global net sales threshold. Therefore, we were not entitled to receive the remaining contingent milestone payment. As of December 31, 2020, there were
no contingent milestone payments outstanding.

The table below summarizes the change in fair value of the Royalty Pharma contingent milestone (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2020
Balance at beginning of period$95.3 
Change in fair value(95.3)
Balance at end of period$— 

During the year ended December 31, 2020, Royalty Pharma payments decreased $42.0 million,from Biogen for Tysabri® sales, as a result of the decreasedefined in the estimated projected Tysabri® revenues due toagreement between the launch of Ocrevus® late inparties, did not exceed the first quarter of 2017.

In addition, payment of the contingent milestone payments is dependent on2020 global net sales threshold of Tysabri®. Of$351.0 million. Therefore, we are not entitled to receive the $134.5 million of estimated fair valuedremaining contingent milestone payments aspayment of December 31, 2017, $79.7 million and $54.8 million relates to the 2018 and 2020 contingent milestone payments, respectively. If Tysabri® global net sales do not meet the prescribed threshold in 2018, we will write off the $79.7 million asset as an expense to Change in financial assets on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. If the prescribed threshold is exceeded, we will write up the asset to $250 million and recognize income of $170.3 million in Change in financial assets on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. If Tysabri® global net sales do not meet the prescribed threshold in 2020, we will write off the $54.8 million asset as an expense to Change in financial assets on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. If the prescribed threshold is exceeded, we will write up the asset to $400.0 million and, recognize incomeaccordingly, wrote off the entire fair value of $345.2 million in Change in financial assets on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Global Tysabri® net sales need to exceed $1.9 billion and $2.0 billion in 2018 and 2020, respectively in order for Royalty Pharma to receive the level of royalties needed to trigger theremaining milestone payments owed to us.

See Note 1 for amounts recorded in our accounts receivablepayment related to our Tysabri® financial asset.

The table below presents a reconciliation for the Royalty Pharma contingent milestone payments measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) (in millions). Change in fair value in the table was recorded2020 of $95.3 million in Change in financial assets on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 Year Ended
 December 31,
2017
Royalty Pharma Contingent Milestone Payments 
Beginning balance$
Additions184.5
Payments(8.0)
Change in fair value(42.0)
Ending balance$134.5

Interest Rate Swaps

The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using a market approach, which utilizes values for comparable swap instruments.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 6


Guarantee Liability Related to The Israel API Sale

On November 21, 2017, we completedDuring the sale of our Israel API business to SK Capital (refer to Item 8. Note 2). As a result ofyear ended December 31, 2019, the sale, we recognized a guarantee liability, which was classified as a level 3 liability. Per the agreement, we will be reimbursed for tax receivables for tax years prior to closing and will need to reimburse SK Capital for the settlement of any uncertain tax liability positions for tax years prior to closing. In addition, after closing and going forward, the Israel API business, will be assessed by and liable to the Israel Tax Authority ("ITA") for any audit findings. As of November 21, 2017, we are no longer the primary obligor on the liabilities transferred to SK Capital, however, we have provided a guarantee on certain obligations that were recorded at a fair value of $13.8 million, with a maximum possible payout of $34.9 million.

Contingent Consideration

Contingent consideration representsthe Royalty Pharma contingent milestone payment obligations obtained through product acquisitions, which are valued using estimatesrelated to 2020 increased by $22.1 million to $95.3 million. These adjustments were driven by higher projected global net sales of Tysabri and the estimated probability of achieving the earn-out. There was no contingent milestone based on probability-weighted outcomes, sensitivity analysis, and discount rates reflective of the risk involved. The estimates are updated quarterly and the liabilities are adjusted to fair value depending on a number of assumptions, including the competitive landscape and regulatory approvals that may impact the future2019 sales of a product. We reduced a contingent consideration liability associated with certain IPR&D assets (refer to Note 3) and recorded a corresponding gain of $17.4Tysabri. The Royalty Pharma payments from Biogen for Tysabri were $337.5 million in 2018, which triggered the $250.0 million milestone payment received during the year ended December 31, 2017. The liability decrease relates to a reduction of the probability of achievement assumptions and anticipated cash flows (refer to Note 2). In addition, we sold a certain IPR&D asset and the corresponding contingent consideration of $12.5 million was reduced. Purchases or additions for the year ended December 31, 2016 included contingent consideration associated with five transactions.2019.
The table below presents a reconciliation for liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) (in millions). Net realized losses in the table were recorded in Other expense (Income), net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
 Year Ended Six Months Ended
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Contingent Consideration     
Beginning balance$69.9
 $17.9
 $
Net realized losses(19.5) (2.1) 
Purchases or additions
 56.7
 17.9
Divestiture(12.5) 
 
Currency translation adjustments1.5
 0.1
 
Settlements(17.4) (2.7) 
Ending balance$22.0
 $69.9
 $17.9

Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements


The non-recurring fair values represent only those assets whose carrying values were adjusted to fair value during the reporting period.


Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets


We have six reporting units for which we assess the goodwill in each reporting unit for impairment. We conduct our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment test on the first day of the fourth quarter, unless indications of impairment exists during an interim period. We utilize a comparable company market approach, weighted equally with a discounted cash flow analysis, to determine the fair value of the reporting units. We utilize either a relief from royalty method or a multi-period excess earnings method to value our indefinite-lived intangible assets. We use a consistent set of projected financial information for the goodwill and indefinite-lived asset impairment tests. The discounted cash flow analysis that we prepared for goodwill impairment testing purposes forLatin America

During the year ended December 31, 20172021, as a result of our definitive agreement to sell our Latin American businesses, we prepared a goodwill impairment test. We determined the carrying value of this business exceeded the fair value and recorded an impairment in the CSCA segment (refer to Note 4).

Oral Care Reporting Unit Goodwill

During the year ended December 31, 2021, we prepared a goodwill impairment test utilizing a combination of comparable company and discounted cash flow techniques. In our comparable company market approach, we considered observable market information (Level 2 inputs). Our cash flow projections included revenue assumptions, gross margin and operating expenses based on the reporting unit’s growth plans (Level 3 inputs). In our discounted cash flow analysis, we used a long-term growth rates ranging fromrate of 2.0% to 3.0%. We
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 6


also utilized used a discount rates ranging from 7.5% to 13.5%,rate of 9.75% in the analysis, which were deemed to be commensuratecorrelates with the required investment return and risk involved in realizingthat we believe market participants would apply to the projected free cash flows of each reporting unit.growth rate. In addition, we burdened projected free cash flows with the capital spending deemed necessary to support the cash flows of each reporting unit, and applied theblended jurisdictional tax rates ranging from 16.5% to 29.1%. We weighted indications of fair value resulting from the market approach and present value techniques, considering the reasonableness of the range of measurements and the point within the range that were applicablewe determined was most representative of fair market conditions (refer to the jurisdictions represented within each reporting unit. We recorded Impairment charges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations related to Goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets of $1.1 billion and $849.5 million, forNote 4).
108

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 7



Licensed Pain Relief Products

During the year ended December 31, 2016, respectively.2019, we measured the impairment of certain pain relief products that we license from a third party, a definite-lived intangible asset. We recorded Impairment charges ondetermined the Consolidated Statements of Operations relatedasset was fully impaired because the agreement with the licensor would not be extended upon expiration (refer to indefinite-lived intangible assets of $185.1 millionNote 4).

Assets (liabilities) held for sale, net

During the six monthsyear ended December 31, 2015. As2021, as a result of December 31, 2017,our definitive agreement to sell our Latin American businesses, we prepared an impairment test on the remaining goodwill and indefinite-lived asset balances were $4.2 billion and $90.3 million, respectively (refernet assets held for sale related to Note 3).

Definite-Lived Intangible Assets

When assessing our definite-livedthis business. We determined the carrying value of the net assets held for impairment, we utilize either a multi-period excess earnings method or a relief from royalty method to determinesale exceed the fair value of the assetless cost to sell and use the forecasts that are consistent with those usedrecorded an impairment in the reporting unit analysis. We conduct our definite-lived intangible asset impairment test quarterly when indications of impairment exists. Below is a summary of the various metrics used in our valuations:
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
Lumara
5-year average growth rate(4.1)%
Discount rate13.5%
Valuation methodMPEEM
 Year Ended
 December 31, 2016
 Omega - Lifestyle Omega -
XLS
 
Entocort® - Branded Products
 
Entocort® - AG Products
 Herron Trade Names and Trademarks
5-year average growth rate2.5% 3.2% (31.7)% (30.4)% 4.6%
Long-term growth rates2.0% NA (10.0)% (4.7)% 2.5%
Discount rate9.3% 9.5% 13.0% 10.5% 10.8%
Royalty rateNA 4.0% NA NA 11.0%
Valuation methodMPEEM Relief from Royalty MPEEM MPEEM Relief from Royalty

We recorded Impairment charges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations related to definite-lived intangible assets of $665.6 million during the year endedDecember 31, 2016. These impairments were primarily recorded in our BCH and RX goodwill reporting unitsCSCA segment (refer to Note 39 for a additional detail on impaired definite-lived intangible assets)).
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 6


Fixed Rate Long-term Debt


Our fixed rate long-term debt consisted of public bonds, a private placement note and retail bonds as followsthe following (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Level 1Level 2Level 1Level 2
Public bonds
Carrying value (excluding discount)$2,760.0 $— $2,760.0 $— 
Fair value$2,847.2 $— $3,031.1 $— 
Private placement note
Carrying value (excluding premium)$— $153.5 $— $164.9 
Fair value$— $162.6 $— $177.5 
   Year Ended
 Fair Value Hierarchy December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
        
Public bondsLevel 1      
Carrying value  $2.6
 $4.6
 $3.9
Fair value  $2.7
 $4.6
 $3.8
        
Retail bonds and private placement noteLevel 2      
Carrying value (excluding premium)  $306.0
 $773.1
 $798.3
Fair value  $342.1
 $825.0
 $859.8
Premium  $21.4
 $49.8
 $82.5


The fair values of our public bonds for all periods were based on quoted market prices. The fair values of our retail bonds and private placement note for all periods were based on interest rates offered for borrowings of a similar nature and remaining maturities.


The carrying amounts of our other financial instruments, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, short-term debt, revolving credit agreements, promissory notes related to our equity method investments, and variable rate long-term debt, approximate their fair value.


NOTE 78 - INVESTMENTSDISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Available for Sale Securities


Our availablediscontinued operations primarily consist of our RX segment, which held our prescription pharmaceuticals business in the U.S. and our pharmaceuticals and diagnostic businesses in Israel (collectively, the “RX business”).

On March 1, 2021, we announced a definitive agreement to sell our RX business to Altaris. On July 6, 2021, we completed the sale of the RX business for sale securities are reported in Prepaid expenses and other current assets. Unrealized investment gains (losses) on available for sale securities were as follows (in millions):
 Year Ended Six Months Ended
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Equity securities, at cost less impairments$15.5
 $16.5
 $6.4
Gross unrealized gains1.5
 21.7
 9.3
Gross unrealized losses
 
 (0.8)
Estimated fair value of equity securities$17.0
 $38.2
 $14.9

aggregate consideration of $1.55 billion. The factors affecting the assessment of impairments include both general financial market conditions and factors specific toconsideration includes a particular company. We recorded impairment charges of $1.8$53.3 million and $10.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, and the six months ended December 31, 2015, respectively,reimbursement related to other-than-temporary impairments of marketable equity securities duean ANDA for a generic topical lotion which Altaris is required to prolonged losses incurred on eachdeliver in cash to Perrigo pursuant to the terms of the investments.

We have evaluated the near-term prospectsAgreement. The sale resulted in a pre-tax gain, net of the equity securities in relation to the severity and durationprofessional fees, of any impairments, and based on that evaluation, we have the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value.

We sold a number of our investment securities and recorded gains of $1.6$47.5 million and $1.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The gains were reclassified out of AOCI and into earnings.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 7



Cost Method Investments

Our cost method investments totaled $6.3 million, $6.9 million, and $6.9 million at December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively, and were included in Other non-current assets. During the year ended December 31, 2017, due to significant and prolonged losses incurred by one of our cost method investments, we recorded a $1.0 million impairment charge in Other (income) expense, neton theConsolidated Statements of Operations.

Equity Method Investments

Our equity method investments totaled $4.9 million, $4.6 million, and $45.5 million at December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively, and were included in Other non-current assets. We recorded net gains of $0.3 million, and net losses of $4.1 million, $5.4 million, and $11.6 million during the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the six months ended December 31, 2015, and the year endedJune 27, 2015, respectively, for our proportionate share of the equity method investment earnings or losses. The gains and losses were recorded in Other (income) expense, net on the Consolidated StatementsStatement of Operations.Operations for discontinued operations. The gain included a $159.3 million increase from the write-off of foreign currency translation adjustment from Accumulated other comprehensive income. The transaction gain was subject to final settlements under the Agreement, which were finalized in the first quarter of 2022 with no change to the gain reported for the year ended December 31, 2021.


As of March 1, 2021, we determined that the RX business met the criteria to be classified as a discontinued operation and, as a result, its historical financial results have been reflected in our consolidated financial statements as a discontinued operation and its assets and liabilities have been classified as held for sale. We ceased recording
109

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 8
depreciation and amortization on the RX business assets from March 1, 2021. We have not allocated any general corporate overhead to the discontinued operation.

Under the terms of the agreement, we will provide transition services for up to 24 months after the close of the transaction and we entered into a reciprocal supply agreement pursuant to which Perrigo will supply certain products to the RX business and the RX business will supply certain products to Perrigo. The supply agreements have a term of four years, extendable up to seven years by the party who is the purchaser of the products under such agreement. We also extended distribution rights to the RX business for certain OTC products owned and manufactured by Perrigo that may be fulfilled through pharmacy channels, in return for a share of the net profits.

We recognized $7.2 million of income related to the transition services agreement ("TSA") in Other operating expense (income) and collected $3.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2021. We recognized $60.6 million of product sales and royalty income in Net sales related to the supply and distribution agreements with the RX business, of which $28.7 million was collected during the year ended December 31, 2021. We purchased $18.4 million of inventories related to the supply arrangement with the RX business of which we paid $12.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2021.

Additionally, under the TSA, we net settle any receipts received or payments made on behalf of the RX business’ customers or vendors. As of December 31, 2021, we recorded a receivable in the amount of $2.3 million in Prepaid expenses and other current assets for the reimbursement due to Perrigo.

In the transaction, Perrigo retained certain pre-closing liabilities arising out of antitrust (refer to Note 19 - Contingencies under the header "Price-Fixing Lawsuits") and opioid matters and the Company’s Albuterol recall, subject to, in each case, the buyer's obligation to indemnify the Company for 50 percent of these liabilities up to an aggregate cap on the buyer's obligation of $50.0 million. We have not requested payments from the buyer related to the indemnity of these liabilities during the twelve months ended December 31, 2021.

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax was as follows (in millions):

 Year Ended
 December 31, 2021December 31, 2020December 31,
2019
Net sales$405.1 $975.0 $967.5 
Cost of sales258.4 645.1 619.5 
Gross profit146.7 329.9 348.0 
Operating expenses
Distribution6.1 15.2 14.1 
Research and development30.8 54.8 67.3 
Selling16.3 30.1 25.1 
Administration36.4 31.8 39.1 
Impairment charges— 346.8 170.7 
Restructuring— 0.3 0.3 
Other operating expense (income)(0.4)0.7 1.3 
Total operating expenses89.2 479.7 317.9 
Operating income (loss)57.5 (149.8)30.1 
Interest expense, net0.8 3.5 4.3 
Other (income) expense, net(1.6)2.0 2.8 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before tax58.3 (155.3)23.0 
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations before tax(47.5)— — 
Income (loss) before income taxes105.8 (155.3)23.0 
Income tax expense43.8 51.5 35.6 
Income (loss), net of tax$62.0 $(206.8)$(12.6)

110

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 8
During the year ended December 31, 2016, one2021, we incurred $40.8 million of our equity method investments became publicly traded. Asseparation costs related to the sale of the RX business. The costs incurred included selling costs, which were reported in gain on discontinued operations before tax as part of the gain on sale of the RX business. Separation costs incurred in prior periods were included in administration expenses.

Select cash flow information related to discontinued operations was as follows (in millions):
Year Ended
 December 31, 2021December 31, 2020December 31,
2019
Cash flows from discontinued operations operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization$15.4 $97.0 $99.4 
Restructuring charges— 0.3 0.3 
Impairment charges— 346.8 170.7 
Share-based compensation10.8 5.2 5.5 
Gain on sale of business(47.5)— — 
Cash flows from discontinued operations investing activities:
Asset acquisitions$(69.7)$(0.9)$(49.1)
Additions to property, plant and equipment(16.1)(10.2)(16.3)
Net proceeds from sale of business1,491.9 — — 

Asset acquisitions related to discontinued operations consisted of 2 Abbreviated New Drug Applications ("ANDAs") purchased under a result,contractual arrangement. On December 31, 2020, we transferredpurchased an ANDA for a generic topical gel for $16.4 million, which was subsequently paid during the $15.5 million investment to availablethree months ended April 3, 2021 and on March 8, 2021, we purchased an ANDA for a generic topical lotion for $53.3 million. These ANDAs were acquired by Altaris as part of the RX business sale.

The assets and liabilities classified as held for sale and recorded an $8.7 million unrealized gain, net of tax in Other Comprehensive Income ("OCI"). In addition, duerelated to significant and prolonged losses incurred on one of our equity method investments, we recorded a $22.3 million impairment charge in Other (income) expense, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.discontinued operations were as follows (in millions):


December 31,
2020
Cash and cash equivalents$10.0 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for credit losses of $1.1460.7 
Inventories140.8 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets55.4 
Current assets held for sale666.9 
Property, plant and equipment, net131.4 
Operating lease assets31.3 
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets681.2 
Definite-lived intangible assets, net492.8 
Deferred income taxes3.6 
Other non-current assets23.7 
Non-current assets held for sale1,364.0 
Total assets held for sale$2,030.9 
Accounts payable$92.2 
Payroll and related taxes22.3 
Accrued customer programs237.4 
Other accrued liabilities67.2 
Current indebtedness0.5 
Current liabilities held for sale419.6 
Long-term debt, less current portion0.7 
Deferred income taxes3.1 
Other non-current liabilities104.5 
Non-current liabilities held for sale108.3 
Total liabilities held for sale$527.9 
111

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 9
NOTE 8 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
We enter into certain derivative financial instruments, when available on a cost-effective basis, to mitigate our risk associated with changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates as follows:

Interest rate risk management - We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes through our cash investments and borrowings. We utilize a variety of strategies to manage the impact of changes in interest rates including using a mix of debt maturities along with both fixed-rate and variable-rate debt. In addition, we may enter into treasury-lock agreements and interest rate swap agreements on certain investing and borrowing transactions to manage our exposure to interest rate changes and our overall cost of borrowing.

Foreign currency exchange risk management - We conduct business in several major currencies other than the U.S. dollar and are subject to risks associated with changing foreign exchange rates. Our objective is to reduce cash flow volatility associated with foreign exchange rate changes on a consolidated basis to allow management to focus its attention on business operations. Accordingly, we enter into various contracts that change in value as foreign exchange rates change to protect the value of existing foreign currency assets and liabilities, commitments, and anticipated foreign currency sales and expenses.
All derivative instruments are managed on a consolidated basis to efficiently net exposures and thus take advantage of any natural offsets. Gains and losses related to the derivative instruments are expected to be offset largely by gains and losses on the original underlying asset or liability. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

    All of our designated derivatives were classified as cash flow hedges as of December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015. Designated derivatives meet hedge accounting criteria, which means the fair value of the hedge is recorded in shareholders’ equity as a component of OCI, net of tax. The deferred gains and losses are recognized in income in the period in which the hedged item affects earnings. Any ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative is immediately recognized in earnings. All of our designated derivatives are assessed for hedge effectiveness quarterly.

We also have economic non-designated derivatives that do not meet hedge accounting criteria. These derivative instruments are adjusted to current market value at the end of each period through earnings. Gains or losses on these instruments are offset substantially by the remeasurement adjustment on the hedged item.    

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 8


Interest Rate Swaps and Treasury Locks

Interest rate swap agreements are contracts to exchange floating rate for fixed rate payments (or vice versa) over the life of the agreement without the exchange of the underlying notional amounts. The notional amounts of the interest rate swap agreements are used to measure interest to be paid or received and do not represent the amount of exposure to credit loss. The differential paid or received on the interest rate swap agreements is recognized as an adjustment to interest expense.

During the three months ended July 1, 2017, we repaid $584.4 million of senior notes with an interest rate of 4.000% due 2023 and $309.5 million of senior notes with an interest rate of 5.300% due 2043 (refer to Note 10). As a result of the senior note repayments on June 15, 2017, the proportionate amount remaining in OCI related to the pre-issuance hedge was reclassified to earnings. Accordingly, we recorded a loss of $5.9 million in Other expense, net, during the three months ended July 1, 2017 for the amount remaining in OCI.

During the six months ended December 31, 2015, we entered into a forward interest rate swap to hedge against changes in the benchmark interest rate between the date the interest rate swap was entered into and the date of expected future debt issuance. The interest rate swap was designated as a cash flow hedge and had a notional amount totaling $200.0 million. The interest rate swap was settled upon the issuance of an aggregate $1.2 billion principal amount of senior notes on March 7, 2016 for a cumulative after-tax loss of $7.0 million in OCI during the three months ended April 2, 2016.

During the year ended June 27, 2015, we repaid a $300.0 million term loan with floating interest rates priced off the LIBOR yield curve (refer to Note 10). As a result of the term loan repayment on June 24, 2015, the forward interest rate swap agreements with notional amounts totaling $240.0 million that were in place to hedge the change in the LIBOR rate were terminated as well. We recorded a loss of $3.6 million in Other expense, net, during the year ended June 27, 2015 for the amount remaining in AOCI when the hedges were terminated.

In connection with the Omega acquisition, we assumed a $20.0 million private placement note. We also assumed an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount totaling $20.0 million that was in place to hedge the cross currency exchange differences between the U.S. dollar and the euro on the above-mentioned debt. On May 29, 2015, we repaid the loan and the interest rate swap. We also assumed €500.0 million ($544.5 million) of debt under Omega's revolving credit facility, as well as an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of €135.0 million ($147.0 million) that was in place to hedge the change in the floating rate on that credit facility. On April 8, 2015, we repaid the loan and terminated the interest rate swap. Because both interest rate swaps mentioned above were recorded at fair market value on the date of termination, no gain or loss was recorded. For more information on the acquired debt and termination (refer to Note 10).

During the year ended June 27, 2015, we entered into forward interest rate swaps and treasury locks (together "Rate Locks") to hedge against changes in the interest rates between the date the Rate Locks were entered into and the date of the issuance of our 2014 Bonds (refer to Note 10). These Rate Locks were designated as cash flow hedges of expected future debt issuances with a notional amount totaling $750.0 million. The Rate Locks were settled upon the issuance of an aggregate $1.6 billion principal amount of our 2014 Bonds on December 2, 2014 for a cumulative after-tax loss of $5.8 million in OCI after recording $1.1 million of ineffectiveness to Other expense, net, during the year ended June 27, 2015.

Foreign Currency Derivatives

We enter into foreign currency forward contracts, both designated and non-designated, in order to manage the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations on expected future purchases and related payables denominated in a foreign currency, as well as to hedge the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations on expected future sales and related receivables, and expected future royalties denominated in a foreign currency. Both types of forward contracts have a maximum maturity date of 18 months. The total notional amount for these contracts was $592.3 million, $533.5 million, and $755.5 million, as of December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively.

In June 2015, in order to economically hedge the foreign currency exposure associated with the planned payment of the euro-denominated GSK Products acquisition (refer to Note 2), we entered into a non-designated
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 8


option contract to protect against a strengthening of the euro relative to the U.S. dollar. We recorded losses of $1.9 million for the change in fair value of the option contract during the year ended June 27, 2015 in Other expense, net. Because these derivatives were economically hedging future acquisitions, the cash outflows associated with their settlement are shown as investing activity on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

In November 2014, in order to economically hedge the foreign currency exposure associated with the planned payment of the euro-denominated purchase price of Omega, we entered into non-designated option contracts with a total notional amount of €2.0 billion. The option contracts settled in December 2014, resulting in a loss of $26.4 million. The option contracts were replaced with non-designated forward contracts that matured during the three months ended March 28, 2015. We recorded losses of $298.1 million during the year ended June 27, 2015 related to the settlement of the forward contracts.Both losses were recorded primarily in Other expense, net. The losses on the derivatives due to changes in the euro to U.S. dollar exchange rates were economically offset at closing in the final settlement of the euro-denominated Omega purchase price.

Effects of Derivatives on the Financial Statements
The below tables indicate the effects of all derivative instruments on the Consolidated Financial Statements. All amounts exclude income tax effects and are presented in millions.

The balance sheet location and gross fair value of our outstanding derivative instruments were as follows:
   Asset Derivatives
   Fair Value
 Balance Sheet Location December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Designated derivatives:       
Foreign currency forward contractsOther current assets $4.1
 $3.1
 $3.8
Non-designated derivatives:       
Foreign currency forward contractsOther current assets $2.2
 $0.7
 $1.0
   Liability Derivatives
   Fair Value
 Balance Sheet Location December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Designated derivatives:       
Foreign currency forward contractsAccrued liabilities $1.4
 $3.0
 $2.0
Interest rate swap agreementsOther non-current liabilities 
 
 0.3
Total designated derivatives  $1.4
 $3.0
 $2.3
Non-designated derivatives:       
Foreign currency forward contractsAccrued liabilities $2.4
 $2.0
 $1.9

The gains (losses) recorded in OCI for the effective portion of our designated cash flow hedges were as follows:
  Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recorded in OCI
(Effective Portion)
  Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
Designated Cash Flow Hedges December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
Treasury locks $
 $
 $
 $(2.7)
Interest rate swap agreements 
 (9.0) (0.3) (10.1)
Foreign currency forward contracts 9.4
 2.1
 1.7
 (7.7)
  $9.4
 $(6.9) $1.4
 $(20.5)

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 8


The gains (losses) reclassified from AOCI into earnings for the effective portion of our designated cash flow hedges were as follows:
    Amount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Earnings
(Effective Portion)
    Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
Designated Cash Flow Hedges 
Income Statement
Location
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
Treasury locks Interest expense, net $(0.1) $(0.1) $
 $(0.1)
Interest rate swap agreements Interest expense, net (2.1) (2.3) (0.8) (16.4)
  Other expense (Income), net (6.0) 
 
 
Foreign currency forward contracts Net sales 1.5
 1.3
 (1.8) 1.9
  Cost of sales 5.6
 3.0
 0.8
 (4.2)
  Interest expense, net (2.6) (1.6) (0.4) 
  Other expense (Income), net (1.5) 0.4
 1.1
 (4.4)
    $(5.2) $0.7
 $(1.1) $(23.2)

The net of tax amount expected to be reclassified out of AOCI into earnings during the next 12 months is a $5.5 million gain.

The gains (losses) recognized against earnings for the ineffective portion of our designated cash flow hedges were as follows:
    Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized against Earnings
(Ineffective Portion)
    Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
Designated Cash Flow Hedges 
Income Statement
Location
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
Treasury locks Other expense (Income), net $
 $
 $
 $(0.4)
Interest rate swap agreements Other expense (Income), net 
 (0.1) 
 (0.7)
Foreign currency forward contracts Net sales 0.2
 (0.1) (0.1) (0.1)
  Cost of sales 0.1
 (0.1) 0.2
 0.2
  Other expense, net 1.0
 $0.6
 
 
Total   $1.3
 $0.3
 $0.1
 $(1.0)
The effects of our non-designated derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows:
    Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income
    Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
Non-Designated Derivatives 
Income Statement
Location
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
Foreign currency forward contracts Other expense (Income), net $12.6
 $(2.4) $(8.0) $(295.4)
  Interest expense, net (5.3) (2.2) (0.7) (3.4)
Foreign exchange option contracts Other expense (Income), net 
 
 
 (26.4)
Total   $7.3
 $(4.6) $(8.7) $(325.2)

NOTE 9 - ASSETS HELD FOR SALE


Our India APIWe classify assets as "held for sale" when, among other factors, management approves and commits to a formal plan of sale with the expectation the sale will be completed within one year. The net assets of the business was classified as held-for-sale beginning asheld for sale are then recorded at the lower of December 31, 2015. We recorded impairment charges totaling $6.3 million and $29.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, after determining thetheir current carrying value ofand the India API business exceeded its fair
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 9


market value, less the costcosts to sell. On April 6, 2017, we completed the sale of our India API business (refer to Note 2). The India API business was reported in our Other segment.


During the three months ended October 1, 2016,July 3, 2021, management committed to a plan to sell certain fixed assets associated with our animal health pet treats plant. SuchLatin American businesses; as a result, such assets were classified as held-for-sale beginning at October 1, 2016. On February 1, 2017,held for sale. The assets associated with this business were reported within our CSCA segment. The sale is expected to close in the first half of 2022. At July 3, 2021, we completed the sale of our animal health pet treats plant fixed assets (refer to Note 2). We determined that the carrying value of the fixednet assets associated with our animal health pet treats plantheld for sale of this business exceeded thetheir fair value less the cost to sell.sell, resulting in an impairment charge of $152.5 million. At December 31, 2021 and October 2, 2021 we recorded additional impairment charge of $1.0 million and $2.6 million, respectively resulting in a total impairment charge of $156.1 million. We also recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $6.1 million within our CSCA segment (refer to Note 4), resulting in a total impairment charge of $162.2 million.

The assets and liabilities held for sale related to the Latin American businesses were reported within Current assets held for sale and Current liabilities held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Net of impairment charges, the assets and liabilities of the Latin American businesses reported as held for sale as of December 31, 2021 totaled $16.1 million and $32.9 million, respectively.

NOTE 10 - INVESTMENTS

The following table summarizes the measurement category, balance sheet location, and balances of our equity securities (in millions):
Year Ended
Measurement CategoryBalance Sheet LocationDecember 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Fair value methodPrepaid expenses and other current assets$0.4 $2.5 
Fair value method(1)
Other non-current assets$1.8 $1.9 
Equity methodOther non-current assets$66.4 $69.8 

(1) Measured at fair value using the Net Asset Value practical expedient.
The following table summarizes the expense (income) recognized in earnings of our equity securities (in millions):
Year Ended
Measurement CategoryIncome Statement LocationDecember 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Fair value methodOther (income) expense, net$2.0 $3.0 $4.9 
Equity methodOther (income) expense, net$1.1 $(3.0)$(2.7)

On June 17, 2020, we announced our entrance into the cannabidiol (“CBD”) market through a strategic investment in and long-term supply agreement with Kazmira LLC ("Kazmira"), a leading supplier of hemp-based CBD products free of tetrahydrocannabinol (“THC-free”) based in Watkins, Colorado. In addition to the supply agreement, we acquired an approximate 20% equity stake in Kazmira for $50.0 million with $15.0 million paid at close of the transaction and the balance due within 18 months thereafter, reported in our CSCA segment (refer to Note 13). Our minority equity investment initiates the first phase of the partnership in which we will collaborate to scale-up Kazmira’s facilities and laboratories, in accordance with current Good Manufacturing Practices, to produce zero-THC CBD from industrial hemp that meets our standards for reliability and consistency. In the second phase of the partnership, we will work to launch zero-THC hemp-based CBD products in a number of global markets, while leveraging our supply agreement with Kazmira, which is exclusive for the U.S. store brand market. We report our equity method earnings from Kazmira in our Consolidated Financial Statements on a quarterly lag.

112

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 11

NOTE 11 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

Foreign Currency Option Contracts

We enter into foreign currency option contracts, both designated and non-designated, in order to manage the impact of fluctuations of foreign exchange on expected future purchases and related payables denominated in a foreign currency and to hedge the impact of fluctuations of foreign exchange on expected future sales and related receivables denominated in a foreign currency.

In September of 2021, to economically hedge the foreign currency exposure associated with the planned payment of the euro-denominated purchase price for HRA Pharma, we entered into 2 non-designated currency option contracts with a total notional amount of $1.1 billion that will mature in the third quarter of 2022. We recorded impairment charges totaling $3.7a loss of $20.9 million for the change in fair value of the option contracts during the year ended December 31, 2016.2021 in Other (income) expense, net. Gains or losses on the derivatives due to changes in the EUR/USD exchange rate prior to the close of the acquisition will be economically offset at closing in the final settlement of the euro-denominated HRA Pharma purchase price. At the time of settlement, we are obligated to pay contract premiums of $25.9 million.

Cross Currency Swaps

In a cross-currency swap, interest payments and principal in one currency are exchanged for principal and interest payments in a different currency. Interest payments are exchanged at fixed intervals during the life of the agreement. Changes in the fair value of cross-currency swaps designated as net investment hedges are recognized as a component of OCI as a foreign currency translation adjustment and are recognized in earnings only upon the sale or substantial liquidation of the hedged net investment. In assessing the effectiveness of these hedges, we use a method based on changes in spot rates to measure the impact of the foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on both our foreign subsidiary net investment and the related swap. Under this method, changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument, other than those due to changes in the spot rate, are initially recorded in OCI as a translation adjustment. The assets associated withexcluded component is recognized on a systematic and rational basis by accruing the swap payments and receipts within Interest expense, net.

On August 15, 2019, we entered into a cross-currency swap designated as a net investment hedge to hedge the Euro currency exposure of our animal health pet treats plantnet investment in European operations. This agreement is a contract to exchange floating-rate Euro payments for floating-rate U.S. dollar payments through August 15, 2022. We terminated this cross-currency swap January 28, 2022. The payments are based on a notional basis of €450.0 million ($498.0 million) and settle quarterly.

Interest Rate Swaps

Interest rate swap agreements are contracts to exchange floating rate for fixed rate payments (or vice versa) over the life of the agreement without the exchange of the underlying notional amounts. The notional amounts of the interest rate swap agreements are used to measure interest to be paid or received and do not represent the amount of exposure to credit loss. The differential paid or received on the interest rate swap agreements is recognized as an adjustment to interest expense. There were reported in our CHCA segment.no active designated or non-designated interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.


Foreign Currency Forwards

In a foreign currency forward, a contract is written to exchange currencies at a fixed exchange rate at a future settlement date. We designate foreign currency forwards primarily as cash flow hedges to protect against foreign currency fluctuations of probable forecasted purchases and sales. The settlement dates of foreign currency forwards range from 1 to 60 months.
113

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 11


Foreign currency forward contracts were as follows (in millions):
Notional Amount
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
European Euro (EUR)$232.6 $312.6 
British Pound (GBP)135.8 92.3 
Swedish Krona (SEK)47.8 41.2 
Chinese Yuan (CNH)37.7 49.1 
Danish Krone (DKK)37.5 65.2 
Canadian Dollar (CAD)29.0 36.8 
United States Dollar (USD)22.9 101.5 
Polish Zloty (PLZ)21.0 21.8 
Norwegian Krone (NOK)11.0 7.8 
Turkish Lira (TRY)3.1 4.0 
Switzerland Franc (CHF)1.9 8.2 
Australian Dollar (AUD)1.6 11.3 
Romanian New Leu (RON)1.6 3.6 
Mexican Peso (MPX)1.0 15.6 
Israeli Shekel (ILS)— 94.4 
Other3.6 2.3 
Total$588.1 $867.7 

Effects of Derivatives on the Financial Statements
The assets held-for-salebelow tables indicate the effects of all derivative instruments on the Consolidated Financial Statements. All amounts exclude income tax effects.

The balance sheet location and gross fair value of our outstanding derivative instruments were reported within Prepaid expensesas follows (in millions):
Asset Derivatives
Fair Value
Year Ended
Balance Sheet LocationDecember 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Designated derivatives
Foreign currency forward contractsPrepaid expenses and other current assets$3.5 $5.0 
Foreign currency forward contractsOther non-current assets1.3 0.5 
Cross-currency swapOther non-current assets— 6.3 
Total designated derivatives$4.8 $11.8 
Non-designated derivatives
Foreign currency forward contractsPrepaid expenses and other current assets$0.9 $4.3 
Foreign currency optionsPrepaid expenses and other current assets5.0 — 
Total non-designated derivatives$5.9 $4.3 

114

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 11

Liability Derivatives
Fair Value
Year Ended
Balance Sheet LocationDecember 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Designated derivatives
Foreign currency forward contractsOther accrued liabilities$1.2 $5.5 
Cross-currency swapOther accrued liabilities13.8 — 
Total designated derivatives$15.0 $5.5 
Non-designated derivatives
Foreign currency forward contractsOther accrued liabilities$1.2 $2.4 

The following tables summarize the effect of derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("AOCI") (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31, 2021
Instrument
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recorded in OCI(1)
Classification of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into EarningsAmount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into EarningsClassification of Gain/(Loss) Recognized into Earnings Related to Amounts Excluded from Effectiveness TestingAmount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Earnings on Derivatives Related to Amounts Excluded from Effectiveness Testing
Cash flow hedges
Treasury locks$— Interest expense, net$(0.1)Interest expense, net$— 
Interest rate swap agreements— Interest expense, net(1.8)Interest expense, net— 
Foreign currency forward contracts5.7 Net sales(2.5)Net sales— 
Cost of sales0.8 Cost of sales0.5 
Other (income) expense, net0.7 
$5.7 $(3.6)$1.2 
Net investment hedges
Cross-currency swap$(20.1)Interest expense, net$(3.9)

(1) Net loss of $7.5 million is expected to be reclassified out of AOCI into earnings during the next 12 months.


115

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 11

Year Ended
December 31, 2020
InstrumentAmount of Gain/(Loss) Recorded in OCIClassification of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into EarningsAmount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into EarningsClassification of Gain/(Loss) Recognized into Earnings Related to Amounts Excluded from Effectiveness TestingAmount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Earnings on Derivatives Related to Amounts Excluded from Effectiveness Testing
Cash flow hedges
Treasury locks$— Interest expense, net$(0.1)Interest expense, net$— 
Interest rate swap agreements— Interest expense, net(1.8)Interest expense, net— 
Foreign currency forward contracts5.0 Net sales0.2 Net sales0.1 
Cost of sales2.0 Cost of sales0.9 
Other Income/Expense0.5 
$5.0 $0.3 $1.5 
Net investment hedges
Cross-currency swap$(20.0)Interest expense, net$6.6 
Foreign currency forward contract(11.2)Interest expense, net(0.1)
$(31.2)$6.5 

Year Ended
December 31, 2019
InstrumentAmount of Gain/(Loss) Recorded in OCIClassification of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into EarningsAmount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into EarningsClassification of Gain/(Loss) Recognized into Earnings Related to Amounts Excluded from Effectiveness TestingAmount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Earnings on Derivatives Related to Amounts Excluded from Effectiveness Testing
Cash flow hedges
Treasury locks$— Interest expense, net$(0.1)Interest expense, net$— 
Interest rate swap agreements— Other (income) expense, net(1.8)Other (income) expense, net— 
Foreign currency forward contracts(2.4)Net sales2.5 Net sales(2.1)
Cost of sales(0.9)Cost of sales(2.6)
$(2.4)$(0.3)$(4.7)
Net investment hedges
Cross-currency swap$31.2 Interest expense, net$4.9 
116

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 11


The amounts of (income)/expense recognized in earnings related to our non-designated derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows (in millions):
Year Ended
Non-Designated DerivativesIncome Statement LocationDecember 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Foreign currency forward contractsOther (income) expense, net$(5.1)$(1.1)$(24.8)
Interest expense, net1.3 3.5 (3.1)
$(3.8)2.4 $(27.9)
Foreign currency optionsOther (income) expense, net$20.9 $— $— 

The classification and other currentamount of gain/(loss) recognized in earnings on fair value and hedging relationships were as follows (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31, 2021
Net SalesCost of SalesInterest Expense, netOther (Income) Expense, net
Total amounts of income and expense line items presented on the Consolidated Statements of Operations in which the effects of fair value or cash flow hedges are recorded$4,138.7 $2,722.5 $125.0 $26.7 
The effects of cash flow hedging:
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships
Foreign currency forward contracts
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings$(2.5)$0.8 $— $— 
Amount excluded from effectiveness testing recognized using a systematic and rational amortization approach$— $0.5 $— $0.7 
Treasury locks
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings$— $— $(0.1)$— 
Interest rate swap agreements
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings$— $— $(1.8)$— 

Year Ended
December 31, 2020
Net SalesCost of SalesInterest Expense, netOther (Income) Expense, net
Total amounts of income and expense line items presented on the Consolidated Statements of Operations in which the effects of fair value or cash flow hedges are recorded$4,088.2 $2,593.3 $127.7 $16.3 
The effects of cash flow hedging:
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships
Foreign currency forward contracts
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings$0.2 $2.0 $— $— 
Amount excluded from effectiveness testing recognized using a systematic and rational amortization approach$0.1 $0.9 $— $0.5 
Treasury locks
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings$— $— $(0.1)$— 
Interest rate swap agreements
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings$— $— $(1.8)$— 
117

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 12

NOTE 12 - LEASES

The balance sheet locations of our lease assets and liabilities held-for-sale were reported in Accrued liabilities. The amounts consisted of the followingas follows (in millions):
AssetsBalance Sheet LocationDecember 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
OperatingOperating lease assets$166.9 $154.7 
FinanceOther non-current assets27.9 29.8 
Total$194.8 $184.5 
LiabilitiesBalance Sheet LocationDecember 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Current
OperatingOther accrued liabilities$26.0 $28.3 
FinanceCurrent indebtedness4.9 6.7 
Non-Current
OperatingOther non-current liabilities147.3 132.5 
FinanceLong-term debt, less current portion20.9 20.2 
Total$199.1 $187.7 
The below table shows our lease assets and liabilities by reporting segment (in millions):
AssetsLiabilities
OperatingFinancingOperatingFinancing
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
CSCA$98.2 $75.9 $15.3 $16.7 $99.7 $75.8 $16.0 $17.0 
CSCI30.7 34.4 7.9 5.9 31.8 35.2 5.0 2.5 
Unallocated38.0 44.4 4.7 7.2 41.8 49.8 4.8 7.4 
Total$166.9 $154.7 $27.9 $29.8 $173.3 $160.8 $25.8 $26.9 
Lease expense was as follows (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Operating leases(1)
$38.6 $37.3 
Finance leases
Amortization$5.9 $4.4 
Interest0.8 0.8 
Total finance leases$6.7 $5.2 

    (1) Includes short-term leases and variable lease costs, which are immaterial.
Total operating lease expense for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $37.9 million.
118
 December 31,
2016
 CHCA Other
Assets held for sale   
Current assets$
 $5.1
Goodwill
 5.5
Property, plant and equipment13.5
 33.2
Other assets
 3.8
Less: impairment reserves(3.7) (35.3)
Total assets held for sale$9.8
 $12.3
Liabilities held for sale   
Current liabilities$0.1
 $1.9
Other liabilities
 1.9
Total liabilities held for sale$0.1
 $3.8


Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1012




The annual future maturities of our leases as of December 31, 2021 are as follows (in millions):

Operating LeasesFinance LeasesTotal
2022$29.9 $5.6 $35.5 
202322.5 3.9 26.4 
202419.4 2.4 21.8 
202516.9 2.2 19.1 
202615.3 2.1 17.4 
After 202694.9 13.7 108.6 
Total lease payments198.9 29.9 228.8 
Less: Interest25.6 4.1 29.7 
Present value of lease liabilities$173.3 $25.8 $199.1 
`

Our weighted average lease terms and discount rates are as follows:
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years)
Operating leases11.4310.63
Finance leases9.238.81
Weighted-average discount rate
Operating leases2.63 %3.02 %
Finance leases2.79 %3.08 %

Our lease cash flow classifications are as follows (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities
Operating cash flows for operating leases$33.5 $34.4 
Operating cash flows for finance leases$0.8 $0.8 
Financing cash flows for finance leases$5.3 $4.1 
Leased assets obtained in exchange for new finance lease liabilities$4.6 $7.0 
Leased assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities$48.8 $84.5 



119

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 13

NOTE 1013 - INDEBTEDNESS


Total borrowings outstanding are summarized as follows (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Term loan
2019 Term loan due August 15, 2022$600.0 $600.0 
Notes and bonds
CouponDue
*5.105%
July 28, 2023(3)
153.5 164.9 
4.000%
November 15, 2023(2)
215.6 215.6 
3.900%
December 15, 2024(1)
700.0 700.0 
4.375%
March 15, 2026(4)
700.0 700.0 
3.900%
June 15, 2030(5)
750.0 750.0 
5.300%
November 15, 2043(2)
90.5 90.5 
4.900%
December 15, 2044(1)
303.9 303.9 
Total notes and bonds2,913.5 2,924.9 
Other financing25.8 57.4 
Unamortized premium (discount), net(4.8)(0.3)
Deferred financing fees(14.0)(17.1)
Total borrowings outstanding3,520.5 3,564.9 
Current indebtedness(603.8)(37.3)
Total long-term debt less current portion$2,916.7 $3,527.6 
     December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Revolving credit agreements       
 2015 Revolver$
 $
 $380.0
 2014 Revolver
 
 300.0
 Total revolving credit agreements
 
 680.0
Term loans       
*2014 term loan due December 5, 2019420.0
 420.7
 488.8
Notes and bonds       
 CouponDue       
 1.300%November 8, 2016
(2) 
 
 
 500.0
*4.500%May 23, 2017
(3) 
 
 189.3
 195.5
*5.125%December 12, 2017
(3) 
 
 315.6
 325.8
 2.300%November 8, 2018
(2) 
 
 600.0
 600.0
*5.000%May 23, 2019
(3) 
 144.0
 126.2
 130.3
 3.500%March 15, 2021
(4) 
 280.4
 500.0
 
 3.500%December 15, 2021
(1) 
 309.6
 500.0
 500.0
*5.105%July 19, 2023
(3) 
 162.0
 142.0
 146.7
 4.000%November 15, 2023
(2) 
 215.6
 800.0
 800.0
 3.900%December 15, 2024
(1) 
 700.0
 700.0
 700.0
 4.375%March 15, 2026
(4) 
 700.0
 700.0
 
 5.300%November 15, 2043
(2) 
 90.5
 400.0
 400.0
 4.900%December 15, 2044
(1) 
 303.9
 400.0
 400.0
 Total notes and bonds  2,906.0
 5,373.1
 4,698.3
Other financing11.7
 3.6
 128.2
Unamortized premium (discount), net21.4
 33.0
 73.4
Deferred financing fees(17.9) (33.1) (36.6)
Total borrowings outstanding3,341.2
 5,797.3
 6,032.1
 Current indebtedness(70.4) (572.8) (1,060.5)
Total long-term debt less current portion$3,270.8
 $5,224.5
 $4,971.6


(1)    Discussed below collectively as the "2014 Notes"
(1)Discussed below collectively as the "2014 Notes."
(2)Discussed below collectively as the "2013 Notes."
(3)Debt assumed from Omega.
(4)Discussed below collectively as the "2016 Notes."

(2)    Discussed below collectively as the "2013 Notes"
*Debt denominated in euros subject to fluctuations in the euro-to-U.S. dollar exchange rate.
(3)    Debt assumed from Omega
(4)    Discussed below collectively as the "2016 Notes"
(5)    Discussed below as the "2020 Notes". The coupon rate noted above is that as of December 31, 2021, following a step up in rate from 3.150% to 3.900%, effective December 16, 2021.

*    Debt denominated in euros subject to fluctuations in the euro-to-U.S. dollar exchange rate.
    
WeRevolving Credit Agreements

On March 8, 2018, we entered into amendmentsa $1.0 billion revolving credit agreement maturing on March 16, 2017 related to8, 2023 (the "2018 Revolver"). There were no borrowings outstanding under the 20142018 Revolver andas ofDecember 31, 2021 or December 31, 2020.

Term Loans

In August 2019, we refinanced a prior term loan with the 2014proceeds of a $600.0 million term loan, maturing on August 15, 2022 (the "2019 Term Loan, providing for additional time to deliver certain financial statements, as well as the modification of certain financial and other covenants. We also entered into additional amendments to the 2014 Revolver and the 2014 Term Loan on April 25, 2017 to modify provisions of such agreements necessary asLoan"). As a result of the correctionrefinancing, during the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded a loss of $0.2 million, consisting of the write-off of deferred financing fees in accountingLoss on extinguishment of debt on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. We had $600.0 million outstanding under the 2019 Term Loan as ofDecember 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

Waiver and Amendment of Debt Covenants

We are subject to financial covenants in the 2018 Revolver and 2019 Term Loan, including a maximum leverage ratio covenant, which previously required us to maintain a ratio of Consolidated Net Indebtedness to Consolidated EBITDA (as such terms are defined in such credit agreements) of not more than 3.75 to 1.00 at the end of each fiscal quarter. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, we received a waiver for non-compliance with such covenants as of July 3, 2021, from the lenders under both such credit facilities and entered
120

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 13

into amendments to each of the 2018 Revolver and 2019 Term Loan. Due to the waiver and amendment described above, our leverage ratios at the end of the second and third quarters of 2021 do not prevent us from drawing under the 2018 Revolver. Additionally, on December 3, 2021, Perrigo Finance Unlimited Company ("Perrigo Finance”), Perrigo Company PLC (the “Company”), each lender party thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as administrative agent, entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s 2019 Term Loan (the “Term Loan Amendment”) and Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s 2018 Revolver (the “Revolver Amendment”) with the lenders under each such facility, pursuant to which the maximum leverage ratio was increased to 5.75 to 1.00 for the fourth quarter of 2021 and the first quarter of 2022, returning to 3.75 to 1.00 beginning with the second quarter of 2022. If we consummate certain qualifying acquisitions in the second quarter of 2022 or any subsequent quarter during the term of the loan, the maximum ratio would increase to 4.00 to 1.00 for such quarter. The amendments also modified certain provisions related to restricted payments to account for the amended leverage ratio covenant. Finally, the Revolver Amendment contains amendments related to the Tysabri® financial asset,replacement of LIBOR with the Sterling Overnight Index Average (SONIA) as well as waiversthe benchmark for borrowings under the 2018 Revolver in Pounds Sterling. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, we incurred amendment and arrangement fees of any default or event of default that may arise from any restatement of or deficiencies$1.4 million, in our financial statements for the periods specified in such amendments and waivers. No default or event of default existed prior to entering intoconnection with these amendments, which were capitalized and waivers. Wewill be amortized over the life of the debt. As of December 31, 2021, we are in compliance with all the covenants under our debt agreements as of December 31, 2017.agreements.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 10


Revolving Credit Agreements

On December 9, 2015, our 100% owned finance subsidiary, Perrigo Finance Unlimited Company ("Perrigo Finance"), entered into a $750.0 million revolving credit agreement (the "2015 Revolver"). On March 15, 2016, we used the proceeds of the long-term debt issuance described below under "2016 Notes" to repay the $750.0 million then outstanding under the 2015 Revolver and terminated the facility.

On March 30, 2015, we assumed a revolving credit facility with €500.0 million ($544.5 million) outstanding from Omega. On April 8, 2015, we repaid the €500.0 million ($539.1 million) outstanding under the assumed revolving credit facility and terminated the facility.

On December 5, 2014, Perrigo Finance entered into a $600.0 million revolving credit agreement, which increased to $1.0 billion on March 30, 2015 (the "2014 Revolver"). On March 15, 2016, we used the proceeds of the long-term debt issuance described below under "2016 Notes" to repay the $435.0 million then outstanding under the 2014 Revolver. There were no borrowings outstanding under the 2014 Revolver as of December 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016.

Term Loans

On December 5, 2014, Perrigo Finance entered into a term loan agreement consisting of a €500.0 million ($614.3 million) tranche, with the ability to draw an additional €300.0 million ($368.6 million) tranche, maturing December 5, 2019; we also entered into a $300.0 million term loan tranche maturing December 18, 2015, which we repaid in full on June 25, 2015.

On September 6, 2013, Perrigo Company entered into a $1.0 billion term loan agreement (the "2013 Term Loan") (together with the 2013 Revolver, the "2013 Credit Agreements"). The 2013 Term Loan consisted of a $300.0 million tranche maturing December 18, 2015 and a $700.0 million tranche maturing December 18, 2018. Both tranches were drawn in full on December 18, 2013. Amounts outstanding under the 2013 Credit Agreements bore interest at our option (a) at the alternative base rate or (b) the eurodollar rate plus, in either case, applicable margins as set forth in the 2013 Credit Agreements. Perrigo Company obligations under the 2013 Credit Agreements were guaranteed by Perrigo Company plc, certain U.S. subsidiaries of Perrigo Company plc, Elan, and certain Irish subsidiaries of Elan until November 21, 2014, at which time the terms of the 2013 Credit Agreements were amended to remove all guarantors. On December 5, 2014, we repaid the remaining $895.0 million outstanding under our 2013 Term Loan, then terminated it. We recorded a $10.5 million loss on extinguishment of debt during the year ended June 27, 2015, which consisted of the Bridge Loan Facility interest expense and deferred financing fees related to the 2013 Credit Agreements, and 2013 Term Loan.


Notes and Bonds


2020 Notes and 2021 Notes Redemption

On June 19, 2020, Perrigo Finance Unlimited Company issued $750.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.150% Senior Notes due 2030 and received net proceeds of $737.1 million after the underwriting discount and offering expenses. Interest on the 2020 Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on December 15, 2020. Due to a credit ratings downgrade by S&P and Moody's in the third quarter of 2021, the interest of the 2020 Notes has stepped up from 3.150% to 3.900%, starting with the interest payment due on December 15, 2021. The 2020 Notes will mature on June 15, 2030 and are governed by a base indenture and a third supplemental indenture (collectively, the "2020 Indenture"). The 2020 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by Perrigo. Perrigo Finance may redeem the 2020 Notes in whole or in part at any time for cash at the make-whole redemption prices described in the 2020 Indenture.

On July 6, 2020, the proceeds of the 2020 Notes were used to fund the redemption of Perrigo Finance's $280.4 million of 3.500% Senior Notes due March 15, 2021 and $309.6 million of 3.500% Senior Notes due December 15, 2021. The balance was used for general corporate purposes. As a result of the early redemption of the $280.4 million of 3.500% Senior Notes and $309.6 million of 3.500% Senior Notes, during the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded a loss of $20 million in Loss on extinguishment of debt on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, consisting of the premium on debt repayments, the write-off of deferred financing fees, and the write-off of the remaining bond discounts.

2016 Notes


On March 7, 2016, Perrigo Finance issued $500.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.500% senior notes due 2021 and $700.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.375% senior notes due 2026 (together, the "2016 Notes") and received net proceeds of $1.2 billion after fees and market discount. Interest on the 2016 Notes is payable semiannuallysemi-annually in arrears in March and September of each year, beginning in September 2016. The 2016 Notes are governed by a base indenture and a second supplemental indenture (collectively, the "2016 Indenture"). The 2016 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior basis by Perrigo, and no other subsidiary of Perrigo guarantees the 2016 Notes. The proceeds were used to repay our revolving credit agreement entered into in December 2014 and amounts borrowed under the 2015 Revolver and the 2014 Revolver, as mentioned above.a $750.0 million revolving credit agreement Perrigo Finance had entered into in December 2015. There are no restrictions under the 2016 Notes on our ability to obtain funds from our subsidiaries. Perrigo Finance may redeem the 2016 Notes in whole or in part at any time for cash at the make-whole redemption prices described in the 2016 Indenture. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we repaid $219.6 million of the 3.500% senior notes due 2021. On July 6, 2020, we repaid the remaining $280.4 million of 3.500% senior notes due 2021, as discussed above under the heading 2020 Notes and 2021 Notes Redemption.


Notes and Bonds Assumed from Omega


In connection with the Omega acquisition, on March 30, 2015, we assumed:

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 10


$20.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.190% senior notes due 2016, which was repaid on May 29, 2015 in full;
€135.0the remaining assumed debt includes €135.0 million ($147.0 million) in aggregate principal amount of 5.105% senior notes due 2023 (the "2023 Notes");
€300.0 million ($326.7 million) in aggregate principal amount of 5.125% retail bonds due 2017;
€180.0 million ($196.0 million) in aggregate principal amount of 4.500% retail bonds due 2017; and
€120.0 million ($130.7 million) in aggregate principal amount of 5.000% retail bonds due 2019 (collectively, the "Retail Bonds").

121

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 13


The fair value of the 2023 Notes and Retail Bondsexceeded par value by €93.6 million($101.9 million) on the date of the Omega acquisition. As a result, a fair value adjustment was recorded as part of the carrying value of the underlying debt and will be amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining terms of the respective debt instruments. The adjustment does not affect cash interest payments.


Also in connection with the Omega acquisition, we assumed a 5.000% retail bond due in 2019 in the amount of €120.0 million ($130.7 million), which was repaid in full on May 23, 2019.

2014 Notes


On December 2, 2014, Perrigo Finance issued $500.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.500% senior notes due 2021 (the "2021 Notes”), $700.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.900% senior notes due 2024 (the “2024 Notes”), and $400.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.900% senior notes due 2044 (the “2044 Notes” and, together with the 2021 Notes and the 2024 Notes, the “2014 Notes”) and received net proceeds of $1.6 billion after fees and market discount. Interest on the 2014 Notes is payable semiannuallysemi-annually in arrears in June and December of each year, beginning in June 2015. The 2014 Notes are governed by a base indenture and a first supplemental indenture (collectively, the "2014 Indenture"). The 2014 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by Perrigo, and no other subsidiary of Perrigo guarantees the 2014 Notes. There are no restrictions under the 2014 Notes on our ability to obtain funds from our subsidiaries. Perrigo Finance may redeem the 2014 Notes in whole or in part at any time for cash at the make-whole redemption prices described in the 2014 Indenture. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we repaid $96.1 million of the 4.900% senior notes due 2044 and $190.4 million of the 3.500% senior notes due 2021. On July 6, 2020, we repaid the remaining $309.6 million of the 3.500% notes due 2021, as discussed above under the heading 2020 Notes and Notes Redemption.


2013 Notes


On November 8, 2013, Perrigo Company issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 1.300% senior notes due 2016 (the "1.300% 2016 Notes"), $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 2.300% senior notes due 2018 (the "2018 Notes"), $800.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 4.000% senior notes due 2023 (the "4.000% 2023 Notes") and $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.300% senior notes due 2043 (the "2043 Notes" and, together with the 1.300% 2016 Notes, the 2018 Notes and the 4.000% 2023 Notes, the "2013 Notes") in a private placement with registration rights. We received net proceeds of $2.3 billion from the issuance of the 2013 Notes after fees and market discount. On September 29, 2016, we repaid all $500.0 million of the 1.300% 2016 Notes outstanding. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we made the following debt repayments: all $600.0 million of the 2018 Notes, $584.4 million of the 4.000% 2023 Notes, and $309.5 million of the 2043 Notes.


Interest on the 2013 Notes is payable semiannuallysemi-annually in arrears in May and November of each year, beginning in May 2014. The 2013 Notes are governed by a base indenture and a first supplemental indenture (collectively, the "2013 Indenture"). The 2013 Notes are our unsecured and unsubordinated obligations, ranking equally in right of payment to all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. The 2013 Notes are not entitled to mandatory redemption or sinking fund payments. We may redeem the 2013 Notes in whole or in part at any time for cash at the make-whole redemption prices described in the 2013 Indenture. The 2013 Notes were guaranteed on an unsubordinated, unsecured basis by the same entities that guaranteed our then-outstanding credit agreement until November 21, 2014, at which time the 2013 Indenture was amended to remove all guarantors.


On September 2, 2014, we offered to exchange our private placement senior notes for public bonds (the "Exchange Offer"). The Exchange Offer expired on October 1, 2014, at which time substantially all of the private placement notes had been exchanged for bonds registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. As a result of the changes in the guarantor structure noted above, we are no longer required to present guarantor financial statements.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 10



Other Financing


Overdraft Facilities

We have overdraft facilities available that we use to support our cash management operations. We report any balances outstanding in the above table under "Other financing". The balanceThere were no borrowings outstanding under the facilities was $6.9 million and $82.9 million atas of December 31, 20172021 and December 31, 20152020.
122

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 13


On June 17, 2020, we incurred debt of $34.3 million related to our equity method investment in Kazmira pursuant to 2 promissory notes, with $3.7 million, $5.8 million and $24.8 million to be settled in November 2020, May 2021 and November 2021, respectively and there were no balances outstanding under(refer to Note 10). On December 8, 2020, we repaid the facilities at December 31, 2016.

On March 30, 2015, we assumed and repaid certain overdraft facilities totaling €51.4$3.7 million ($56.0 million) withbalance due on the Omega acquisition.

Debt Repayments and Related Extinguishment DuringNovember 2020 portion of the Year Ended December 31, 2017

Promissory Notes. During the year endedDecember 31, 2017,2021, we reduced our outstanding debt through a variety of transactions (in millions):
Date Series Transaction Type Principal Retired
April 1, 2017 2014 term loan due December 5, 2019 Scheduled quarterly payment $13.3
May 8, 2017 $600.0 2.300% senior notes due 2018 Early redemption 600.0
May 23, 2017 €180.0 4.500% retail bonds due 2017 Scheduled maturity 201.3
June 15, 2017 $500.0 3.500% senior notes due 2021 Tender offer 190.4
June 15, 2017 $500.0 3.500% senior notes due 2021 Tender offer 219.6
June 15, 2017 $800.0 4.000% senior notes due 2023 Tender offer 584.4
June 15, 2017 $400.0 5.300% senior notes due 2043 Tender offer 309.5
June 15, 2017 $400.0 4.900% senior notes due 2044 Tender offer 96.1
July 1, 2017 2014 term loan due December 5, 2019 Scheduled quarterly payment 14.3
September 30, 2017 2014 term loan due December 5, 2019 Scheduled quarterly payment 14.8
December 12, 2017 €300.0 5.125% senior notes due 2017 Scheduled maturity 352.3
December 31, 2017 2014 term loan due December 5, 2019 Scheduled quarterly payment 15.0
      $2,611.0

As a resultrepaid the $5.8 million balance due on the May 2021 portion of the early redemptionPromissory Notes and tender offer transactions, we recorded a loss of $135.2the $24.8 million duringbalance due on the three months ended July 1, 2017November 2021 portion, settling the debt in Loss on extinguishment of debt (in millions):full.


We have financing leases that are reported in the above table under "Other financing" (refer to Note 12).
Premium on debt repayment $116.1
Transaction costs 3.8
Write-off of deferred financing fees 10.6
Write-off of remaining discount on bond 4.7
Total loss on extinguishment of debt $135.2

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 10



Future Maturities


The annual future maturities of our short-term and long-term debt, including capitalized leases, are as follows (in millions):
Payment DueAmount
2022$604.9 
2023373.3 
2024704.2 
20254.2 
2026704.2 
Thereafter1,148.5 

Payment Due Amount
2018 $70.4
2019 504.7
2020 0.7
2021 590.0
2022 
Thereafter 2,171.9

NOTE 11 - EARNINGS PER SHARE AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

Earnings per Share

A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in our basic and diluted EPS calculation is as follows (in millions):
 Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
Numerator:       
Net income (loss)$119.6
 $(4,012.8) $42.5
 $136.1
        
Denominator:       
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic EPS142.3
 143.3
 145.6
 139.3
Dilutive effect of share-based awards*0.3
 
 0.5
 0.5
Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted EPS142.6
 143.3
 146.1
 139.8
        
Anti-dilutive share-based awards excluded from computation of diluted EPS*0.8
 
 0.1
 0.1

* In the period of a net loss, diluted shares equal basic shares.

Shareholders' Equity

Our common stock consists of ordinary shares of Perrigo Company plc, a public limited company incorporated under the laws of Ireland.
We trade our ordinary shares on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PRGO. Our ordinary shares are also traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.

Dividends

In January 2003, the Board of Directors adopted a policy of paying quarterly dividends. We paid dividends as follows:
 Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
Dividends paid (in millions)$91.1
 $83.2
 $36.3
 $64.8
Dividends paid (per share)$0.64
 $0.58
 $0.25
 $0.46
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 11



The declaration and payment of dividends and the amount paid, if any, are subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors and depend on our earnings, financial condition, capital and surplus requirements and other factors the Board of Directors may consider relevant.

Share Repurchases

In October 2015, the Board of Directors approved a share repurchase plan of up to $2.0 billion (the "2015 Authorization"). We did not repurchase any shares under the share repurchase plan during the three months ended December 31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we repurchased 2.7 million ordinary shares at an average repurchase price of $71.72 per share, for a total of $191.5 million. We did not repurchase any shares under the share repurchase plan during the year ended December 31, 2016. During the six months ended December 31, 2015, we repurchased 3.3 million ordinary shares at an average repurchase price of $151.59 per share, for a total of $500.0 million.

NOTE 1214 - EARNINGS PER SHARE AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

Earnings per Share

A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in our basic and diluted earnings per share ("EPS") calculation is as follows (in millions):
 Year Ended
 December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Numerator:
Net income (loss)$(68.9)$(162.6)$146.1 
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic EPS133.6 136.1 136.0 
Dilutive effect of share-based awards*— 1.1 0.5 
Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted EPS133.6 137.2 136.5 
Anti-dilutive share-based awards excluded from computation of diluted EPS*— — 1.5 
* In the period of a loss from continuing operations, diluted shares equal basic shares.

Shareholders' Equity

Our common stock consists of ordinary shares of Perrigo Company plc, a public limited company incorporated under the laws of Ireland.
We trade our ordinary shares on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PRGO. On November 22, 2021, we initiated steps to voluntarily delist our ordinary shares from trading on the TASE. The delisting of our ordinary shares took effect on February 23, 2022, three months following the date of our request to the TASE pursuant to Israeli law. All ordinary shares that were traded on TASE were transferred to the NYSE where they continue to be traded.

123

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 14




Dividends

We paid dividends as follows:
 Year Ended
 December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Dividends paid (in millions)$129.6 $123.9 $112.4 
Dividends paid (per share)$0.96 $0.90 $0.82 

The declaration and payment of dividends and the amount paid, if any, are subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors and depend on our earnings, financial condition, availability of distributable reserves, capital and surplus requirements and other factors the Board of Directors may consider relevant.

Share Repurchases

In October 2015, the Board of Directors approved a three-year share repurchase plan of up to $2.0 billion (the "2015 Authorization"). Following the expiration of the 2015 Authorization in October 2018, our Board of Directors authorized up to $1.0 billion of share repurchases with no expiration date, subject to the Board of Directors’ approval of the pricing parameters and amount that may be repurchased under each specific share repurchase program (the "2018 Authorization"). We did not purchase any shares during the year ended December 31, 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we repurchased 3.4 million ordinary shares at an average purchase price of $48.28 per share for a total of $164.2 million under the 2018 Authorization. We did not repurchase any shares during the year ended December 31, 2019.

NOTE 15 - SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS


All share-based compensation for employees and directors is granted under the 20132019 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (the "Plan"). The Plan has been approved by our shareholders and provides for the granting of awards to our employees and directors. As of December 31, 2017, there were 3.8 million shares available to be granted. The purpose of the Plan is to attract and retain individuals of exceptional talent and encourage these individuals to acquire a vested interest in our success and prosperity. The awards that may be granted under this program include non-qualified stock options, restricted shares,stock, restricted share units, and RTSR units.performance share units based on relative total shareholder return ("RTSR"). Restricted shares are generally service-based, requiring a certain length of service before vesting occurs, while restricted share units can be either service-based or performance-based. Performance-based restricted share units require a certain length of service until vesting; however, they contain an additional performance feature, which can vary the amount of shares ultimately paid out based on certain performance criteria specified in the Plan. RTSR performance share units are subject to a market condition. Awards granted under the Plan vest and may be exercised and/or sold from one year to ten years after the date of grant based on a vesting schedule. As of December 31, 2021, there were 2.9 million shares available to be granted.


Share-based compensation expense was as follows (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
$57.0 $53.3 $46.7 
Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
$43.8
 $23.0
 $22.8
 $31.6


As of December 31, 2017,2021, unrecognized share-based compensation expense was $51.2$46.8 million, and the weighted-average period over which the expense is expected to be recognized was approximately 2.01.3 years. Proceeds from the exercise of stock options are credited to ordinary shares.



124

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1215






Stock Options


A summary of activity related to stock options is presented below (options in thousands):
 Number of
Options
Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price Per Share
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Term in
Years
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Options outstanding at December 31, 20191,464 $92.33 
Forfeited or expired(120)$78.21 
Options outstanding at December 31, 20201,344 $93.61 5.2$— 
Forfeited or expired(96)$91.10 
Options outstanding December 31, 20211,248 $93.80 4.4$— 
Options exercisable1,248 $93.80 4.4$— 
Options expected to vest— $— 0.0$— 
 Number of
Options
 Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price Per Share
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Term in
Years
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Options outstanding at December 31, 2015783
 $99.93
    
Granted344
 $126.67
    
Exercised(122) $67.68
    
Forfeited or expired(256) $126.54
    
Options outstanding at December 31, 2016749
 $108.40
 6.6 $5.5
Granted439
 $70.34
    
Exercised(31) $24.75
    
Forfeited or expired(85) $118.47
    
Options outstanding December 31, 20171,072
 $94.90
 6.9 $10.9
Options exercisable519
 $107.14
 5.0 $3.8
Options expected to vest533
 $83.63
 8.7 $6.8


The aggregate intrinsic value for options exercised was as follows (in millions):zero for the years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, and $0.5 for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
$1.7
 $5.2
 $6.7
 $20.7

The weighted-average fair valuesvalue per share at the grant date for options granted were $19.50, $33.53, and $39.96was 0 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2021, December 31, 2016,2020, and June 27, 2015, respectively. There were no options granted during the six months ended December 31, 2015. The fair values were estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:2019.
 Year Ended
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 June 27,
2015
Dividend yield0.9% 0.5% 0.3%
Volatility, as a percent30.0% 27.6% 27.1%
Risk-free interest rate1.8% 1.3% 1.7%
Expected life in years5.41
 5.5
 5.3

The valuation model utilizes historical volatility. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield of U.S. government securities with a maturity date that coincides with the expected term of the option. The expected life in years is estimated based on past exercise behavior of employees.

Non-Vested Restricted Shares

There were no restricted shares granted, vested or outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016, the six months ended December 31, 2015, or the year ended June 27, 2015. The total fair value of restricted shares that vested was $0.9 million for the year ended June 27, 2015.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 12






Non-Vested Service-Based Restricted Share Units


A summary of activity related to non-vested service-based restricted share units is presented below (units in thousands):
Number of
Non-vested
Service-
Based
Share Units
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value Per Share
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Term in
Years
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Number of
Non-vested
Service-
Based
Share Units
 Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value Per Share
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Term in
Years
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Non-vested service-based share units outstanding at December 31, 2015382
 $154.07
    
Non-vested service-based share units outstanding at December 31, 2019Non-vested service-based share units outstanding at December 31, 20191,211 $60.96 
Granted298
 $113.26
  Granted823 $54.68 
Vested(92) $137.15
  Vested(372)$69.64 
Forfeited(120) $151.64
  Forfeited(42)$59.82 
Non-vested service-based share units outstanding at December 31, 2016468
 $137.53
 1.7 $39.0
Non-vested service-based share units outstanding at December 31, 2020Non-vested service-based share units outstanding at December 31, 20201,620 $55.82 1$72.5 
Granted298
 $70.55
  Granted1,197 $41.36 
Vested(112) $128.86
  Vested(782)$60.43 
Forfeited(55) $120.97
  Forfeited(101)$46.32 
Non-vested service-based share units outstanding at December 31, 2017599
 $107.26
 1.5 $52.2
Non-vested service-based share units outstanding at December 31, 2021Non-vested service-based share units outstanding at December 31, 20211,934 $45.52 0.8$75.2 
    
The weighted-average fair value per share at the date of grant for service-based restricted share units granted was as follows (in millions):follows:
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
$41.36 $54.68 $47.48 
125

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 15

Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
$70.55
 $113.26
 $165.64
 $153.99


The total fair value of service-based restricted share units that vested was as follows (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
$47.2 $25.9 $25.6 
Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
$14.5
 $12.6
 $11.7
 $9.1

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 12






Non-Vested Performance-Based Restricted Share Units


A summary of activity related to non-vested performance-based restricted share units is presented below (units in thousands):
 Number of
Non-vested
Performance-
Based
Share Units
Weighted-
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value Per Share
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Term in
Years
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Non-vested performance-based share units outstanding at December 31, 2019653 $61.44 
Granted291 $55.08 
Vested(184)$68.89 
Forfeited(9)$70.60 
Non-vested performance-based share units outstanding at December 31, 2020751 $57.13 1.4$33.6 
Granted381 $41.04 
Vested(188)$75.58 
Forfeited(26)$47.74 
Non-vested performance-based share units outstanding at December 31, 2021918 $47.10 1.2$35.7 
 Number of
Non-vested
Performance-
Based
Share Units
 Weighted-
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value Per Share
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Term in
Years*
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Non-vested performance-based share units outstanding at December 31, 2015223
 $146.31
    
Granted159
 $126.37
    
Vested(81) $128.74
    
Forfeited(124) $143.64
    
Non-vested performance-based share units outstanding at December 31, 2016177
 $138.29
 1.7 $14.8
Granted191
 $70.34
    
Vested(27) $142.18
    
Forfeited(38) $130.34
    
Non-vested performance-based share units outstanding at December 31, 2017303
 $93.65
 2.0 $26.5


The weighted-average fair value of performance-based restricted share units can fluctuate depending upon the success or failure of the achievement of performance criteria as set forth in the Plan. The weighted-average fair value per share at the date of grant for performance-based restricted share units granted was as follows:
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
$41.04 $55.08 $47.54 
Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
$70.34
 $126.37
 $184.49
 $150.14


The total fair value of performance-based restricted share units that vested was as follows (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
$14.2 $12.7 $8.0 
Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
$3.8
 $10.4
 $6.4
 $5.1


Non-vested Relative Total Shareholder Return Performance Share Units


The fair value of the RTSR performance share units is determined using the Monte Carlo pricing model as the number of shares to be awarded is subject to a market condition. The valuation model considers a range of possible outcomes, and compensation cost is recognized regardless of whether the market condition is actually satisfied.
126

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 15

The assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the RTSR performance share units granted during each year were as follows:
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
 Year Ended
 December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Dividend yield2.3 %1.6 %1.6 %
Volatility, as a percent44.0 %40.4 %40.2 %
Risk-free interest rate0.3 %0.6 %1.9 %
Expected life in years2.82.82.4
Note 12





Year Ended
December 31,
2017
Dividend yield0.9%
Volatility, as a percent36.1%
Risk-free interest rate1.4%
Expected life in years2.57


A summary of activity related to non-vested RTSR performance share units is presented below (units in thousands):
 Number of
Non-vested
RTSR Performance Share Units
Weighted-
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value Per Share
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Term in
Years*
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Non-vested RTSR performance share units outstanding at December 31, 2019142 $63.02 
Granted58 $67.72 
Vested(24)$62.73 
Non-vested RTSR performance share units outstanding at December 31, 2020176 $65.04 1.5$7.9 
Granted69 $41.20 
Vested(9)$52.52 
Non-vested RTSR performance share units outstanding at December 31, 2021236 $53.85 1.2$9.2 
 Number of
Non-vested
RTSR Performance Share Units
 Weighted-
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value Per Share
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Term in
Years*
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Non-vested RTSR performance share units outstanding at December 31, 2016
 $
 0 $
Granted39
 $64.82
    
Non-vested RTSR performance share units outstanding at December 31, 201739
 $64.82
 2.0 $3.4


* Midpoint used in calculation.


The weighted-average fair value per share at the date of grant for RTSR performance share units granted was $64.82.as follows:

Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
$41.20 $67.72 $55.61 

The total fair value of RTSR performance share units that vested was as follows (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
$0.5 $1.5 $— 

127

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 16

NOTE 1316 - ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Changes in our AOCIAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss) ("AOCI") balances, net of tax, were as follows (in millions):
Fair Value of Derivative Financial Instruments, net of tax
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments (1)
Post-Retirement and Pension Liability Adjustments, net of taxTotal AOCI
Balance at December 31, 2019$12.7 $132.9 $(6.2)$139.4 
OCI before reclassifications(12.2)228.0 1.8 217.6 
Amounts reclassified from AOCI(1.2)46.4 (7.2)38.0 
Other comprehensive income (loss)(13.4)274.4 (5.4)255.6 
Balance at December 31, 2020(0.7)407.3 (11.6)395.0 
OCI before reclassifications(24.9)(339.9)7.4 (357.4)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI3.6 — (5.7)(2.1)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(21.3)(339.9)1.7 (359.5)
Balance at December 31, 2021$(22.0)$67.4 $(9.9)$35.5 
 Fair value of derivative financial instruments, net of tax Foreign currency translation adjustments Fair value of investment securities, net of tax Post-retirement and pension liability adjustments, net of tax Total AOCI
Balance at June 27, 2015$(16.3) $130.9
 $(2.9) $(8.2) $103.5
OCI before reclassifications1.1
 (135.5) (1.4) 6.7
 (129.1)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI1.0
 
 10.7
 (1.4) 10.3
Other comprehensive income (loss)2.1
 (135.5) 9.3
 5.3
 (118.8)
Balance at December 31, 2015(14.2) (4.6) 6.4
 (2.9) (15.3)
OCI before reclassifications(5.4) (63.3) 7.4
 (3.2) (64.5)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI0.1
 
 1.3
 (3.4) (2.0)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(5.3) (63.3) 8.7
 (6.6) (66.5)
Balance at December 31, 2016(19.5) (67.9) 15.1
 (9.5) (81.8)
OCI before reclassifications7.1
 328.5
 (12.5) 15.0
 338.1
Amounts reclassified from AOCI2.6
 
 (1.6) (4.2) (3.2)
Other comprehensive income (loss)9.7
 328.5
 (14.1) 10.8
 334.9
Balance at December 31, 2017$(9.8) $260.6
 $1.0
 $1.3
 $253.1


(1) Refer to the description in Note 3 of the Rosemont Pharmaceuticals business divestiture for information regarding amounts reclassified from AOCI.

NOTE 1417 - INCOME TAXES


Pre-tax income (loss) and the (benefit) provision for income taxes from continuing operations are summarized as follows (in millions):
 Year Ended
 December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Pre-tax income (loss):
Ireland$341.9 $(179.9)$(204.0)
United States(35.3)91.5 (368.4)
Other foreign(47.9)94.3 720.4 
Total pre-tax income (loss)258.7 5.9 148.0 
Current provision (benefit) for income taxes:
Ireland303.6 0.1 (0.5)
United States14.9 4.5 24.8 
Other foreign81.3 34.9 8.3 
Subtotal399.8 39.5 32.6 
Deferred provision (benefit) for income taxes:
Ireland0.4 (0.1)— 
United States3.3 (64.2)(24.1)
Other foreign(13.9)(13.5)(19.2)
Subtotal(10.2)(77.8)(43.3)
Total provision for income taxes$389.6 $(38.3)$(10.7)
 Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
Pre-tax income (loss):       
Ireland$(454.0) $(3,624.1) $(310.2) $(792.8)
Other734.1
 (1,224.2) 319.1
 1,053.1
Total pre-tax income (loss)280.1
 (4,848.3) 8.9
 260.3
(Benefit) provision for income taxes:       
Current:       
Ireland(8.1) 0.3
 1.6
 (2.2)
United States - federal96.4
 93.0
 58.9
 77.2
United States - state4.0
 0.7
 3.0
 6.8
Other foreign46.1
 26.7
 53.0
 67.4
Subtotal138.4
 120.7
 116.5
 149.2
Deferred (credit):       
Ireland13.1
 (549.4) (23.1) 11.1
United States - federal6.8
 (7.6) (34.4) (19.9)
United States - state1.0
 (5.1) (3.3) (0.8)
Other foreign1.2
 (394.1) (89.3) (15.4)
Subtotal22.1
 (956.2) (150.1) (25.0)
Total (benefit) provision for income taxes$160.5
 $(835.5) $(33.6) $124.2


128

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1417



A reconciliation of the provision based on the FederalIrish statutory income tax rate to our effective income tax rate is as follows:
 Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
        
Provision at statutory rate12.5 % 12.5 % 12.5 % 12.5 %
Ireland tax on non-trading differences(47.7) (0.4) (207.4) (9.9)
Expenses not deductible for tax purposes/deductions not expensed for book, net63.4
 (0.7) 394.0
 14.7
Goodwill impairment not deductible for tax purposes
 (2.8) 
 
U.S. Operations:       
State income taxes, net of federal benefit(1.4) 0.1
 38.4
 (1.0)
Research and development credit(0.6) 
 (13.2) (0.7)
Other(5.8) 0.4
 112.3
 4.8
Tax Law Change - US5.4
 
 
 
Tax Law Change - Belgium(3.2) 
 
 
Other foreign differences (earnings taxed at other than applicable statutory rate)(22.7) 3.3
 (647.2) (16.1)
Intangible impairment differences(3.0) 4.8
 (397.6) 
Worldwide operations:       
Valuation allowance changes17.8
 0.8
 249.3
 25.7
     Change in unrecognized taxes25.3
 (0.8) 82.7
 17.7
Withholding taxes17.3
 
 
 
Effective income tax rate57.3 % 17.2 % (376.2)% 47.7 %
 Year Ended
 December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Provision at statutory rate12.5 %12.5 %12.5 %
Foreign rate differential1.5 (952.9)6.9 
State income taxes, net of federal benefit0.2 139.7 1.5 
Provision to return0.4 144.3 1.0 
Tax credits(19.6)(229.3)(3.9)
Change in tax law1.5 46.5 (1.2)
Change in valuation allowance17.1 (1,331.7)(29.2)
Change in unrecognized taxes116.5 437.3 (8.5)
Permanent differences1.6 1,624.8 16.5 
Legal entity restructuring18.6 (561.9)— 
Taxes on unremitted earnings0.2 (0.1)0.3 
Other0.1 15.0 (3.1)
Effective income tax rate150.6 %(655.8)%(7.2)%
    
We have provided for income taxes for certainAs a result of the divestiture of the RX business and internal restructuring of the U.S. group, our deferred tax liability with respect to undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that have not been deemed to be permanently reinvested. No further provision has been made for income taxes on remaining undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries of approximately $6.3 billion at December 31, 2017, since it is our intention to indefinitely reinvest undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries. Due to the complexity of the legal entity structure and the complexity of the tax laws in various jurisdictions, we believe it is not practicable to estimate, within any reasonable range, the additional income taxes that may be payable on the remittance of such undistributed earnings.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 14


Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the financial reporting and the tax reporting basis of assets and liabilities and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards for tax purposes. The components of our net deferred income tax asset (liability) were as follows:
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Deferred income tax asset (liability):     
Depreciation and amortization$(457.8) $(765.2) $(1,550.6)
Inventory basis differences21.3
 27.4
 22.8
Accrued liabilities87.9
 68.5
 50.8
Allowance for doubtful accounts1.5
 1.7
 1.3
Research and development58.9
 61.7
 63.7
Loss and credit carryforwards292.5
 292.4
 244.2
Share-based compensation16.2
 18.1
 20.6
Foreign tax credit
 10.6
 10.6
Federal benefit of unrecognized tax positions17.0
 24.3
 22.8
Interest carryforwards30.5
 435.3
 334.6
Other, net28.2
 3.0
 14.7
Subtotal$96.2
 $177.8
 $(764.5)
Valuation allowance(407.7) (495.6) (536.8)
Net deferred income tax asset (liability):$(311.5) $(317.8) $(1,301.3)

The above amounts are classified on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows (in millions):
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Assets$10.4
 $72.1
 $71.4
Liabilities(321.9) (389.9) (1,372.7)
Net deferred income tax (liability) asset$(311.5) $(317.8) $(1,301.3)

At December 31, 2017, we had gross carryforwards as follows:
 December 31, 2017
 
Gross
Carryforwards
(1)
 Gross Valuation Allowances
U.S. state net operating losses$248.5
 $203.6
Worldwide federal net operating losses excluding U.S. states$1,389.0
 $861.6
Worldwide federal capital losses$22.0
 $22.0
U.S. federal credits$82.6
 $82.6
U.S. state credits$71.9
 $71.9
Interest carryforwards$478.8
 $127.0

(1)Utilization of such carryforwards within the applicable statutory periods is uncertain.
In 2017, we recorded income tax expense related to valuation allowances of $10.3decreased by $42.5 million in Ireland. In addition, we released valuation allowances2021 to a balance of $42.4 million and $55.8 million for Omega and the U.S. and other jurisdictions, respectively, resulting in a tax benefit.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 14


U.S. federal credit carryforwards of $28.2 million, $37.2 millionand $167.8 million expire through 2022, 2025 and 2027, respectively, with the remaining U.S. credits having no expiration. U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards expire through 2037, and U.S. state credit carryforwards expire through 2032. Of the non-U.S. net operating loss carryforwards, $1.8 million, $20.3 million, $0.9 million, and $0.1 million expire through 2019, 2022, 2024 and 2025, respectively, while the remaining amounts of non U.S. net operating loss carryforwards and non-U.S. capital loss carryforwards have no expiration. The valuation allowances for these net operating loss carryforwards are adjusted annually, as necessary. After application of the valuation allowances, as described above, we anticipate no significant limitations will apply with respect to the realization of our net deferred income tax assets.

The following table summarizes the activity related to amounts recorded for uncertain tax positions, excluding interest and penalties (in millions):
 
Unrecognized
Tax Benefits
Balance at June 27, 2015$324.0
Additions: 
Positions related to the current year22.9
Reductions: 
Positions related to prior years(43.5)
Settlements with taxing authorities(15.3)
Balance at December 31, 2015288.1
Additions: 
Positions related to the current year45.5
Positions related to prior years8.6
Reductions: 
Settlements with taxing authorities(2.4)
Lapse of statutes of limitation(5.3)
Balance at December 31, 2016334.5
Additions: 
Positions related to the current year55.0
Positions related to prior years76.6
Reductions: 
Settlements with taxing authorities(11.1)
Lapse of statutes of limitation(0.1)
Decrease in prior year positions(35.2)
Balance at December 31, 2017$419.7

We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. The total amount accrued for interest and penalties in the liability for uncertain tax positions was $82.0 million, $63.5 million, and $52.1$0.5 million as of December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively.2021. In addition, we have recorded a deferred tax asset of $20.1 million with respect to the outside basis differences in our Latin American businesses held for sale, with a fully offsetting valuation allowance.

The total liability for uncertain tax positions was $501.7 million, $398.0 million, and $340.3 million asAs of December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively, before considering2021, the federal tax benefit of certain state and local items, of which $204.0 million, $248.7 million, and $198.5 million, respectively, would impact the effective tax rate in future periods, if recognized.

We file income tax returns in numerous jurisdictions and are therefore subject to audits by tax authorities. Our primary income tax jurisdictions are Ireland, U.S., Israel, Belgium, France, and the United Kingdom.

Although we believe that our tax estimates are reasonable and that we prepare our tax filings in accordance with all applicable tax laws, the final determination with respect to any tax audit and any related litigation could be materially different from our estimates or from our historical income tax provisions and accruals. The results of an
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 14


audit or litigation could have a material effect on operating results and/or cash flows in the periods for which that determination is made. In addition, future period earnings may be adversely impacted by litigation costs, settlements, penalties, and/or interest assessments.

On August 15, 2017, we filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan to recover $163.6considered approximately $9.2 million of Federal incomeunremitted earnings of our foreign subsidiaries as indefinitely reinvested. The unrecognized deferred tax penalties, and interest assessed and collected by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), plus statutory interest thereon from the dates of payment, for the fiscal years ended June 27, 2009, June 26, 2010, June 25, 2011, and June 30, 2012 (the “2009 tax year,” “2010 tax year,” “2011 tax year,” and “2012 tax year,” respectively). The IRS audits of those years culminated in the issuances of two statutory notices of deficiency: (1) on August 27, 2014 for the 2009 and 2010 tax years and (2) on April 20, 2017 for the 2011 and 2012 tax years. The statutory notices of deficiency both included un-agreed income adjustmentsliability related principally to transfer pricing adjustments regarding the purchase, distribution, and sale of store-brand OTC pharmaceutical products in the United States. In addition, the statutory notice of deficiency for the 2011 and 2012 tax years included the capitalization of certain expenses that were deducted when paid or incurred in defending against certain patent infringement lawsuits. We fully paid the assessed amounts of tax, interest, and penalties set forth in the statutory notices and filed timely claims for refund on June 11, 2015 and June 7, 2017 for the 2009-2010 tax years and 2011-2012 tax years, respectively. Our claims for refund were disallowed by certified letters dated August 18, 2015 and July 11, 2017, for the 2009-2010 tax years and 2011-2012 tax years, respectively. The complaint was timely, based upon the refund claim denials, and seeks refunds of tax, interest, and penalties of $37.2 million for the 2009 tax year, $61.5 million for the 2010 tax year, $40.2 million for the 2011 tax year, and $24.7 million for the 2012 tax year. The amounts sought in the complaint for the 2009 and 2010 tax years were recorded as deferred charges on our balance sheet during the three months ended March 28, 2015, and the amounts sought in the complaint for the 2011 and 2012 tax years were recorded as deferred charges on our balance sheet during the three months ended July 1, 2017.

On December 22, 2016, we received a notice of proposed adjustment for the IRS audit of Athena Neurosciences, Inc. (“Athena”), a subsidiary of Elan acquired in 1996, for the years ended December 31, 2011, December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2013. Perrigo acquired Elan in December 2013. This proposed adjustment relates to the deductibility of litigation costs. We disagree with the IRS’s position asserted in the notice of proposed adjustment and intend to contest it.

On July 11, 2017, we received a draft notice of proposed adjustment associated with transfer pricing positions for the IRS audit of Athena for the years ended December 31, 2011, December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2013. Athena was the originator of the patents associated with Tysabri® prior to the acquisition of Athena by Elan in 1996. In response to the draft notice of proposed adjustment, we provided the IRS with substantial additional documentation supporting our position. The amount of adjustments that may be asserted by the IRS in the final notice of proposed adjustment cannot be quantifiedthese earnings is estimated at approximately $1.2 million. However, this time; however,estimate could change based on the draft notice received,manner in which the amount to be assessed may be material. We disagreeoutside basis differences associated with the IRS’s position as asserted in the draft notice of proposed adjustment and intend to contest it.these earnings reverse.


We have ongoing audits in multiple other jurisdictions the resolution of which remains uncertain. These jurisdictions include, but are not limited to, theThe U.S., Israel, Ireland and other jurisdictions in Europe. In addition to the matters discussed above, the IRS is currently auditing our fiscal years ended June 29, 2013, June 28, 2014, and June 27, 2015. The Israel Tax Authority is currently auditing our fiscal years ended June 29, 2013 and June 28, 2014 (which covers the period of the Elan transaction). The Ireland Tax Authority is currently auditing our years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013.

Based on the final resolution of tax examinations, judicial or administrative proceedings, changes in facts or law, expirations of statute of limitations in specific jurisdictions or other resolutions of, or changes in, tax positions, it is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits for certain tax positions taken on previously filed tax returns may change materially from those represented on the financial statements as of December 31, 2017. During the next 12 months, it is reasonably possible that such circumstances may occur that would have a material effect on previously unrecognized tax benefits. As a result, the total net amount of unrecognized tax benefits may decrease, which would reduce the provision for taxes on earnings by a range estimated at $1.0 million to $17.9 million.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 14


Tax Law Changes

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“U.S. Tax Act”). The U.S. Tax Act includes a number of significant changes to existing U.S. tax laws that impact the Company. These changes include a corporate income tax rate reduction from 35% to 21% and the elimination or reduction of certain U.S. deductions and credits including limitations on the U.S. deductibility of interest expense and executive compensation. The U.S. Tax Act also transitions the U.S. taxation of international earnings from a worldwide system to a modified territorial system. These changes are effective beginning in 2018. The U.S. Tax Act also includes a one-time mandatory deemed repatriation tax on accumulated U.S. owned foreign corporations’ previously untaxed foreign earnings (“Transition Toll Tax”). The Transition Toll Tax may be paid over an eight-year period, starting in 2018, and will not accrue interest.

On December 22, 2017, Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118") was issued to address the application of the U.S. GAAP ASC 740 income tax accounting for tax law changes enacted during 2017, in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the U.S. Tax Act. In accordance with SAB 118, we have recorded an income tax benefit of $2.4 million in connection with the remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities. We also recorded a $17.5 million increase of current tax expense in connection with the Transition Toll Tax on cumulative U.S. owned foreign earnings of $1.2 billion. The tax impacts represent provisional amounts and are a reasonable estimate at December 31, 2017. Additional work is necessary to perform additional analysis of historical foreign earnings and U.S. cumulative temporary differences, as well as potential correlative adjustments. Any subsequent adjustment to these amounts will be recorded to current tax expense in 2018 when the analysis is complete.

The U.S. Tax Act subjects a U.S. shareholder to tax on global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI)("GILTI") earned by certain foreign subsidiaries. The FASB Staff Q&A, Topic 740, No. 5, Accounting for Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income states that an entity can make an accounting policy election to either recognize deferred taxes for temporary basis differences expected to reverse as GILTI in future years or provide for the tax expense related to GILTI in the year the tax is incurred. GivenWe have elected an accounting policy to provide for the complexitytax expense related to GILTI in the year the tax is incurred ("period cost method").

129

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 17

Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the financial reporting and the tax reporting basis of assets and liabilities and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards for tax purposes. The components of our net deferred income tax asset (liability) are presented on a total company basis as follows (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Deferred income tax asset (liability):
Depreciation and amortization$(320.5)$(393.7)
Right of use assets(42.5)(44.3)
Unremitted earnings19.6 (42.0)
Inventory basis differences29.4 27.7 
Accrued liabilities38.3 81.4 
Lease obligations43.2 45.3 
Share-based compensation27.5 24.5 
Federal benefit of unrecognized tax positions21.7 23.5 
Loss and credit carryforwards341.7 390.1 
R&D credit carryforwards39.4 48.4 
Interest carryforwards6.9 17.9 
Other, net13.2 0.9 
Subtotal$217.9 $179.7 
Valuation allowance (1)
(450.7)(414.8)
Net deferred income tax liability$(232.8)$(235.1)

(1) The movement in the valuation allowance balance differs from the amount in the effective tax rate reconciliation due to adjustments affecting balance sheet only items and foreign currency.
The above amounts are classified on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Assets$6.5 $44.2 
Liabilities(239.3)(279.3)
Net deferred income tax liability$(232.8)$(235.1)

For the year ended December 31, 2020, the above balances include $3.6 million of non-current assets and $3.1 million of non-current liabilities held for sale.

The change in valuation allowance reducing deferred taxes was (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Balance at beginning of period$414.8 $501.3 $557.9 
Change in assessment (1)
39.1 (50.3)(8.3)
Current year operations, foreign currency and other(3.2)(36.2)(48.3)
Balance at end of period$450.7 $414.8 $501.3 
(1) Includes additions of $40.0 million related primarily to our Latin American businesses in 2021, and release of $51.5 million of valuation allowance against U.S. deferred tax assets in 2020.

We have U.S. state credit carryforwards and U.S. R&D credit carryforwards of $43.6 million as well as U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryforwards and non-U.S. net operating loss carryforwards of $367.2 million, which will expire at various times through 2041. The remaining U.S. and non-US credit carryforwards of $9.0 million, U.S. federal and non-US loss carryforwards of $1.2 billion, and U.S. interest carryforwards of $28.1 million have no expiration.

130

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 17

For the year ended December 31, 2021 we recorded a net increase in valuation allowances of $35.9 million, comprised primarily of an increase of valuation allowance for deferred tax assets related to our Latin American businesses included as held for sale. Valuation allowances are determined based on management's assessment of its deferred tax assets that are more likely than not to be realized.

We recorded a valuation allowance against all U.S. deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2016 and continued to maintain this valuation allowance through December 31, 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2020, based on current and anticipated future earnings, we released a portion of the GILTI provisions,valuation allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets. The release resulted in the recognition of $51.5 million of U.S. deferred tax assets.

The Company operates in multiple jurisdictions with complex tax policy and regulatory environments and establishes reserves for uncertain tax positions in accordance with the accounting guidance governing uncertainty in income taxes. Uncertainty in a tax position may arise because tax laws are subject to interpretation. The following table is presented on a total company basis and summarizes the activity related to the liability recorded for uncertain tax positions, excluding interest and penalties (in millions):
Unrecognized
Tax Benefits
Balance at December 31, 2019$350.5 
Additions:
Positions related to the current year18.2 
Positions related to prior years28.9 
Reductions:
Lapse of statutes of limitation(2.2)
Decrease in prior year positions(1.0)
Cumulative translation adjustment1.6 
Balance at December 31, 2020396.0 
Additions:
Positions related to the current year11.4 
Positions related to prior years339.0 
Reductions:
Settlements with taxing authorities(344.1)
Lapse of statutes of limitation(11.9)
Decrease in prior year positions(41.9)
Cumulative translation adjustment(1.3)
Balance at December 31, 2021$347.2 

We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. The total amount accrued for interest and penalties in the liability for uncertain tax positions was $105.1 million, $108.9 million, and $98.1 million as of December 31, 2021, December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019, respectively.
If recognized, of the total liability for uncertain tax positions, $240.1 million, $250.2 million, and $204.6 million as of December 31, 2021, December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019, respectively, would impact the effective tax rate in future periods.

Our major income tax jurisdictions are Ireland, the U.S., Israel, Belgium, France, and the United Kingdom. We are routinely audited by the tax authorities in our major jurisdictions. We have substantially concluded all Ireland income tax matters through the year ended December 31, 2013, all U.S. federal income tax matters through the year ended June 28, 2008, all Israel income tax matters through the year ended June 28, 2019. All significant matters in our remaining major tax jurisdictions have been concluded for tax years through 2018.

Internal Revenue Service Audits of Perrigo Company, a U.S. Subsidiary

Perrigo Company, our U.S. subsidiary ("Perrigo U.S.") is engaged in a series of tax disputes in the U.S. relating primarily to transfer pricing adjustments including income in connection with the purchase, distribution, and sale of store-brand OTC pharmaceutical products in the United States, including the heartburn medication omeprazole. On August 27, 2014, we received a statutory notice of deficiency from the IRS relating to our fiscal tax years ended June 27, 2009, and June 26, 2010 (the “2009 tax year” and “2010 tax year”, respectively). On April 20, 2017, we received a statutory notice of deficiency from the IRS for the years ended June 25, 2011 and June 30,
131

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 17

2012 (the “2011 tax year” and “2012 tax year”, respectively). Specifically, both statutory notices proposed adjustments related to the offshore reporting of profits on sales of omeprazole in the United States resulting from the assignment of an omeprazole distribution contract to an affiliate. In addition to the transfer pricing adjustments, which applied to all four tax years, the statutory notice of deficiency for the 2011 and 2012 tax years included adjustments for the capitalization and amortization of certain expenses that were deducted when paid or incurred in defending against certain patent infringement lawsuits related to Abbreviated New Drug Applications (“ANDAs”).

We do not agree with the audit adjustments proposed by the IRS in either of the notices of deficiency. We paid the assessed amounts of tax, interest, and penalties set forth in the statutory notices and timely filed claims for refund on June 11, 2015 for the 2009 and 2010 tax years, and on June 7, 2017, for the 2011 and 2012 tax years. On August 15, 2017, following disallowance of such refund claims, we timely filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan seeking refunds of tax, interest, and penalties of $27.5 million for the 2009 tax year, $41.8 million for the 2010 tax year, $40.1 million for the 2011 tax year, and $24.7 million for the 2012 tax year, for a total of $134.1 million, plus statutory interest thereon from the dates of payment. The amounts sought in the complaint for the 2009 and 2010 tax years were recorded as deferred charges in Other non-current assets on our balance sheet during the three months ended March 28, 2015, and the amounts sought in the complaint for the 2011 and 2012 tax years were recorded as deferred charges in Other non-current assets on our balance sheet during the three months ended July 1, 2017.

The trial was held during the period May 25, 2021 to June 7, 2021 for the refund case in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan. The total amount of cumulative deferred charge that we are still evaluatingseeking to receive in this litigation is approximately $111.6 million, which reflects the effectsimpact of conceding that Perrigo U.S. should have received a 5.24% royalty on all omeprazole sales. That concession was previously paid and is the subject of the GILTI provisionsabove refund claims. The issues outlined in the statutory notices of deficiency described above are continuing in nature, and the IRS will likely carry forward the adjustments set forth therein as long as the drug is sold, in the case of the omeprazole issue, and for all post-2012 Paragraph IV filings that trigger patent infringement suits, in the case of the ANDA issue. On April 30, 2021, we filed a Notice of New Authority in our refund case in the Western District of Michigan alerting the court to a Tax Court decision in Mylan v. Comm'r that ruled in favor of the taxpayer on nearly identical ANDA issues as we have before the court. Post-trial briefings were completed on September 24, 2021 and the case is now fully submitted for the court’s decision. On January 28, 2022, the IRS filed a Notice of Appeal with the United States Court of Appeals of the Third Circuit, to appeal the United States Tax Court's decision in Mylan v. Comm'r.

On January 13, 2021, the IRS issued a 30-day letter with respect to its audit of our fiscal tax years ended June 29, 2013, June 28, 2014, and June 27, 2015. The IRS letter proposed, among other modifications, transfer pricing adjustments regarding our profits from the distribution of omeprazole in the aggregate amount of $141.6 million and ANDA adjustments in the aggregate amount of $21.9 million. The 30-day letter also set forth adjustments described in the next two paragraphs. We timely filed a protest to the 30-day letter for those additional adjustments, but noting that due to the pending litigation described above, IRS Appeals will not consider the merits of the omeprazole or ANDA matters. We believe that we should prevail on the merits on both carryforward issues and have not yet determined our accounting policy. Atreserved for taxes and interest payable on the 5.24% deemed royalty on omeprazole through the tax year ended December 31, 2017, because2018. Beginning with the tax year ended December 31, 2019, we began reporting income commensurate with the 5.24% deemed royalty. We have not reserved for the ANDA-related issue described above. While we believe we should prevail on the merits of this case, the outcome remains uncertain. If our litigation position on the omeprazole issue is not sustained, the outcome for the 2009–2012 tax years could range from a reduction in the refund amount to denial of any refund. In addition, we expect that the outcome of the refund litigation could effectively bind future tax years. In that event, an adverse ruling on the omeprazole issue could have a material impact on subsequent periods, with additional tax liability in the range of $24.0 million to $112.0 million, not including interest and any applicable penalties.

The 30-day letter for the 2013-2015 tax years also proposed to reduce Perrigo U.S.'s deductible interest expense for the 2014 tax year and the 2015 tax year on $7.5 billion in debts owed by it to Perrigo Company plc. The debts were incurred in connection with the Elan merger transaction in 2013. On May 7, 2020, the IRS issued a NOPA capping the interest rate on the debts for U.S. federal tax purposes at 130.0% of the Applicable Federal Rate ("AFR") (a blended rate reduction of approximately 4.0% per annum), on the stated ground that the loans were not negotiated on an arms’-length basis. The NOPA proposes a reduction in gross interest expense of approximately $414.7 million for tax years 2014 and 2015. On January 13, 2021, we received a Revenue Agent Report ("RAR"), together with the 30-day letter, requiring our filing of a written Protest to request IRS Appeals consideration. The Protest was timely filed with the IRS on February 26, 2021. On January 20, 2022, the IRS responded to our Protest with its Rebuttal, and revised its position on this interest rate issue by reasserting that implicit parental support considerations are still evaluatingnecessary to determine the GILTI provisionsarm's length interest rates and our analysisproposed revised interest rates that
132

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 17

are higher than the interest rates proposed under its 130.0% of future taxable income thatAFR assertion. The blended interest rate proposed by the IRS Rebuttal is 4.36%, an increase from the blended interest rate in the RAR of 2.57%, and lower than the stated blended interest rate of the loans of 6.8%. We will pursue all available administrative and judicial remedies necessary to defend the deductibility of the interest expense on this indebtedness. If the IRS were to prevail in its revised proposed adjustment, we estimate an increase in tax expense of approximately $72.9 million, excluding interest and penalties, for fiscal years ended June 28, 2014 through June 27, 2015. In addition, we expect the IRS to seek similar adjustments for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 through December 31, 2018 with potential section 163(j) carryover impacts beyond December 2018. If those further adjustments were sustained, based on preliminary calculations and subject to GILTI,further analysis, our current best estimate is that the additional tax expense will not exceed $58.5 million, excluding interest and penalties. No further adjustments beyond this period are expected. We strongly disagree with the IRS position and we will pursue all available administrative and judicial remedies necessary. At this stage, we are unable to makeestimate any additional liability, if any, associated with this matter.

In addition, the 30-day letter for the 2013-2015 tax years expanded on a reasonable estimateNOPA issued on December 11, 2019 and proposed to disallow adjustments to gross sales income on the sale of prescription products to wholesalers for accrued wholesale customer pipeline chargebacks where the prescription products were not re-sold by such wholesalers to covered retailers by the end of the tax year for the 2013-2015 tax years. The IRS' NOPA asserts that the reduction of gross sales income of such chargebacks is an impermissible method of accounting. The IRS proposed a change in accounting method that would defer the reduction in gross sales income until the year the prescription products were re-sold to covered retailers. The NOPA proposes an increase in sales revenue of approximately $99.5 million for the 2013-2015 tax years. We filed a protest on February 26, 2021 to request IRS Appeals consideration. On January 20, 2022, the IRS responded to our Protest with its Rebuttal and reiterated its position in the NOPA that the accrued chargebacks are not currently deductible in the tax year accrued because all events have not reflected anyoccurred to establish the fact of the liability in the year deducted. If the IRS were to prevail in its proposed adjustment, we estimate a payment of approximately $18.0 million, excluding interest and penalties for the 2013-2015 tax years. In addition, we expect the IRS to seek similar adjustments relatedfor future years. If those future adjustments were to GILTIbe sustained, based on preliminary calculations and subject to further analysis, we estimate this would result in our financial statements.a payment not to exceed $7.0 million through tax year ended December 31, 2021, excluding interest and penalties. We have fully reserved for this issue. We strongly disagree with the IRS’s proposed adjustment and will pursue all available administrative and judicial remedies necessary.


On December 22,2, 2021, the IRS commenced an audit of our federal income tax returns for the tax years ended December 31, 2015, through December 31, 2019.

Internal Revenue Service Audit of Athena Neurosciences, LLC, a U.S. Subsidiary    

On April 26, 2019, we received a revised NOPA from the IRS regarding transfer pricing positions related to the IRS audit of Athena Neurosciences, LLC ("Athena") for the years ended December 31, 2011, December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2013. The NOPA carries forward the IRS's theory from its 2017 draft NOPA that when Elan took over the Belgian Parliament approved Belgianfuture funding of Athena's in-process research and development after acquiring Athena in 1996, Elan should have paid a substantially higher royalty rate for the right to exploit Athena’s early stage intellectual property in various developmental products, including the Multiple Sclerosis drug Tysabri, rather than rates based on transfer pricing documentation prepared by Elan's external tax reform legislation (“Belgium Tax Act”),advisors. The NOPA proposes a payment of $843.0 million, which was signedrepresents additional tax based on imputing royalty income to Athena using a 24.7% royalty rate derived by the Belgian KingIRS and enacteda 40.0% accuracy-related penalty. This amount excludes consideration of offsetting tax attributes and any potential interest that may be imposed. We strongly disagree with the IRS position. On December 22, 2016, we also received a NOPA for these years denying the deductibility of settlement costs related to illegal marketing of Zonegran in the United States raised in a Qui Tam action under the U.S. False Claims Act. We strongly disagree with the IRS' position on this issue as well. Because we believe that any concession on these issues in Appeals would be contrary to our evaluation of the issues, we pursued our remedies under the U.S. - Ireland Income Tax Treaty to alleviate double taxation. On April 21 and 23, 2020, we filed requests for Competent Authority Assistance with the IRS and Irish Revenue on the Tysabri royalty issue, and those applications were accepted. On October 20, 2020, we amended our requests for Competent Authority Assistance to include the Zonegran issue and these supplemental requests were also accepted. On May 6, 2021, we had our opening conference with the IRS. A follow-up conference was held with the IRS on December 25, 2017.13, 2021 and we discussed our submission, which continues to be reviewed by the IRS. Our opening conference with Irish Revenue was held on July 23, 2021 and we discussed our submission, which continues to be reviewed by Irish Revenue. The Belgium Tax Act providesU.S. and Irish Competent Authorities will seek to achieve a resolution that avoids double taxation on both the Tysabri royalty and Zonegran issues.

133

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 17

NaN payment of the additional amounts is required until these two matters are resolved with finality under the treaty, or any additional administrative or judicial process if treaty negotiations are unsuccessful.
Irish Revenue Audit of Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013

On October 30, 2018, we received an audit finding letter from the Irish Office of the Revenue Commissioners (“Irish Revenue”) for a reductionthe years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013. The audit finding letter relates to the corporatetax treatment of the 2013 sale of the Tysabri® intellectual property and related assets to Biogen Idec by Elan Pharma. The consideration paid by Biogen to Elan Pharma took the form of an upfront payment and future contingent royalty payments. Elan Pharma recognized such receipts as trading income in its tax returns filed with Irish Revenue, consistent with Elan Pharma's historical practice relating to its active management of intellectual property rights.

In its audit findings letter, Irish Revenue proposed to charge Elan Pharma tax on the net chargeable gain realized by Elan Pharma on the Tysabri transaction in 2013 at a rate of 33%, rather than the 12.5% tax rate from 34%applied to 30%,trading income. On November 29, 2018, Irish Revenue issued a Notice of Amended Assessment (“NoA”) for the tax year ended December 31, 2013, in the amount of €1,643 million, and claiming tax payable in the amount of €1,636 million, not including interest or any applicable penalties.

Accordingly, we filed an appeal of the NoA on December 27, 2018 with the Irish Tax Appeals Commission ("TAC") which is the statutory body charged with considering whether the NoA was properly founded as a matter of Irish tax law. Separately, we were also granted leave by the Irish High Court on February 25, 2019 to seek judicial review of the issuance of the NoA by Irish Revenue.

On November 4, 2020, the High Court ruled that the Irish Revenue's decision to issue the NoA did not violate Elan Pharma's constitutional rights and legitimate expectations as a taxpayer. The Irish High Court did not rule on the merits of the NoA under Irish tax law.

We strongly believe that Elan Pharma’s tax position was correct and ultimately would have been confirmed through judicial process. However, in light of the risks and delays inherent in any litigation, on April 26, 2021, Perrigo, through its tax adviser, made a without prejudice written offer of settlement to Irish Revenue detailing a possible framework to resolve the dispute, which applied an alternative basis of taxation than the respective positions taken by Irish Revenue in the NoA and by Elan Pharma in its tax returns. On May 31, 2021, Irish Revenue issued a formal response to Perrigo's tax adviser indicating that the written settlement offer would not be accepted as presented. However, Irish Revenue did indicate that they would remain available for further discussion without prejudice and the Company's representatives continued to meet and correspond with Irish Revenue throughout the summer.

On July 9, 2021, Irish Revenue issued a letter acknowledging that not all relevant facts were known to them when they issued the NoA in 2018 and, 2019,accordingly, they would not object if the Appeal Commissioner were to make certain adjustments reducing Irish Revenue’s original assessment. Such adjustments would reflect contingent royalty payments that were never received by Elan Pharma, deductions for acquisition and development costs incurred, and allowable losses and reliefs, and would, if allowed, result in an aggregate reduction of more than €660.0 million from the income taxes claimed in the NoA as wellissued.

On September 29, 2021, Elan Pharma reached an agreement with Irish Revenue providing for full and final settlement of the NoA. Elan Pharma and Irish Revenue agreed to a full and final settlement of the NoA on the following terms: (i) on a 'without prejudice basis' and, for purposes of the settlement, an alternative basis of taxation was applied, (ii) Irish Revenue to take no further action in relation to the NoA or any Tysabri related income or transactions, (iii) no interest or penalties applied, (iv) a total tax of €297.0 million charged as full and final settlement of all liabilities arising from the sale of the Tysabri patents for the fiscal years 2013 to 2021, and (v) after Irish Revenue credited taxes already paid and certain unused R&D credits against the €297.0 million charged settlement amount, the total cash payment of €266.1 million ($307.5 million) was made on October 5, 2021. We recorded the payment as a reduced corporate income tax ratecomponent of 25% for 2020 and beyond. The Belgium Tax Act also increased the participation exemption on dividend distributions to Belgium entities from 95% to 100%. The Belgium Tax Act also introduces Belgium tax consolidation and other anti-tax avoidance directives. We recorded an additional income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of $24.1 millionOperations.
Israel Tax Authority Audit of Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2015 and Calendar Years Ended December 31, 2015 through December 31, 2017

The Israel Tax Authority ("ITA") audited our income tax returns for the remeasurement of certain deferred2015 tax assetsyear, and additional income tax benefit of $33.2 million for the remeasurement of certain deferred tax liabilities as a result of the Belgium Tax Act.
For thecalendar years ended December 31, 2015, December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017. On December 29, 2020, we received a
134

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 17

Stage A assessment from the Israeli Tax Authority for the tax years ended December 31, 2015 statutory rate changes, primarily in Europe, favorably impacted the effective tax ratethrough December 31, 2017 in the amount of $4.0$63.8 million relating to attribution of intangible income to Israel, income qualifying for a lower preferential rate of tax, exemption from capital gains tax, and $27.9 million, respectively.

NOTE 15 - POST EMPLOYMENT PLANS

Defined Contribution Plans

We have a qualified profit-sharing and investment plan under Section 401(k)deduction of certain settlement payments. Our protest was timely filed on March 11, 2021 to move the matter to Stage B of the IRS, which covers substantially all U.S. employees. Our contributions to the plan include an annual nondiscretionary contribution of 3% of an employee's eligible compensation and a discretionary contribution at the option of the Board of Directors. Additionally, we match a portion of employees' contributions.assessment process.


We also have a defined contribution plan that covers our Ireland employees. We contribute up to 18% of each participating employee’s annual eligible salary on a monthly basis.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 15


We assumed a number of defined contribution plans associatedThrough negotiations with the Omega acquisition andITA, we pay contributions toresolved the pension insurance plans.

Our contributions to all ofaudit for the plans were as follows (in millions):
Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
December 31,
2017
 December 31, 2016 December 31,
2015
 June 27, 2015*
$25.5
 $26.1
 $18.9
 $25.9
*    Includes Omega activity from March 30, 2015 totax year ended June 27, 2015

Pensionthrough tax year ended December 31, 2019, by agreeing to add tax year ended December 31, 2018 and Post-Retirement Healthcare Benefit Plans

We assumedtax year ended December 31, 2019 to the liability of two defined benefit plans (staff and executive plan)audit to reach an agreeable resolution to provide certainty for employees based in Irelandthese additional periods. The agreement with the Elan acquisitionITA required us to pay $19.0 million, after offset of refunds of $17.2 million, for the five taxable years. In addition, we paid $12.5 million to resolve a tax liability indemnity for the tax year ended December 31, 2017 relating to Perrigo API Ltd, which we disposed of in 2013. These plans were subsequently merged and all plan assets and liabilities were transferred from the executive scheme to the staff scheme asDecember 2017.

As a result of a plan combination.

In connectionthe settlement with the Omega acquisition,ITA, we assumedreduced our liability recorded for uncertain tax positions by $38.3 million including interest.    

Based on the liability of a number of defined benefit plans. The defined benefit plans cover employees based primarily in the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Switzerland, Greece, France, and Norway. Omega companies operate various pension plans across each country.

Our defined benefit pension plans are managed externally and the related pension costs and liabilities are assessed at least annually in accordance with the advice of a qualified professional actuary. We used a December 31, 2017 measurement date and all plan assets and liabilities are reported as of that date.

We provide certain healthcare benefits to eligible U.S. employees and their dependents who meet certain age and service requirements when they retire. Generally, benefits are provided to eligible retirees after age 65 and to their dependents. Increases in our contribution for benefits are limited to increases in the Consumer Price Index. Additional healthcare cost increases are paid through participant contributions. We accrue the expected costs of such benefits during a portion of the employees’ years of service. The plan is not funded. Under current plan provisions, the plan is not eligible for any U.S. federal subsidy related to the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 Part D Subsidy.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 15


The change in the projected benefit obligation and plan assets consisted of the following (in millions):
 Pension Benefits Other Benefits
 Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended Six Months Ended
 December 31,
2017
 December 31, 2016 December 31,
2015
 December 31,
2017
 December 31, 2016 December 31,
2015
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of period$158.9
 $135.0
 $140.3
 $5.8
 $7.0
 $6.0
Acquisitions
 
 5.6
 
 
 
Curtailment(1.0) 
 
 
 
 
Service costs4.5
 4.1
 2.2
 0.6
 0.6
 0.3
Interest cost3.3
 3.6
 1.7
 0.2
 0.2
 0.1
Actuarial (gain) loss(10.3) 22.6
 (10.1) (0.3) (1.9) 0.5
Contributions paid0.1
 0.3
 
 
 
 
Benefits paid(2.5) (1.7) (0.6) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1)
Foreign currency translation21.0
 (5.0) (4.1) 
 
 0.1
Projected benefit obligation at end of period$174.0
 $158.9
 $135.0
 $6.2
 $5.8
 $7.0
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period138.2
 126.7
 128.1
 
 
 
Acquisitions
 
 3.2
 
 
 
Actual return on plan assets5.5
 9.4
 (1.7) 
 
 
Benefits paid(2.5) (1.7) (0.6) 
 
 
Employer contributions2.2
 8.2
 1.4
 
 
 
Contributions paid0.1
 0.3
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation19.0
 (4.7) (3.7) 
 
 
Fair value of plan assets at end of period$162.5
 $138.2
 $126.7
 $
 $
 $
Unfunded status$(11.5) $(20.7) $(8.3) $(6.2) $(5.8) $(7.0)
Presented as:           
Other non-current assets$22.0
 $10.4
 $16.5
 $
 $
 $
Other non-current liabilities$(33.5) $(31.1) $(24.8) $
 $(5.8) $(7.0)
The total accumulated benefit obligation for the defined benefit pension plans was as follows (in millions):
Year Ended Six Months Ended
December 31,
2017
 December 31, 2016 December 31,
2015
$167.6
 $136.3
 $109.4

The following unrecognized actual gains (losses) for the other benefits liability was included in OCI, netfinal resolution of tax (in millions):
Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
December 31,
2017
 December 31, 2016 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
$0.3
 $(0.7) $(0.4) $0.1






Perrigo Company plc examinations, judicial or administrative proceedings, changes in facts or law, expirations of statute of limitations in specific jurisdictions or other resolutions of, or changes in, tax positions - Item 8
Note 15


The unamortized net actuarial loss in AOCI netone or more of tax for defined benefit pension and other benefits was as follows (in millions):
Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
December 31,
2017
 December 31, 2016 December 31,
2015
 June 27, 2015*
$(1.3) $9.5
 $2.9
 $8.2

*    Includes Omega activity from March 30, 2015 to June 27, 2015

The total estimated credit amount to be recognized from AOCI into net periodic cost during the next year is $0.7 million.

At December 31, 2017, the total estimated future benefit payments to be paid by the plans for the next five years is approximately $9.9 million for pension benefits and $1.0 million for other benefits as follows (in millions):

Payment Due Pension Benefits Other Benefits
2018 $1.4
 $0.1
2019 1.5
 0.2
2020 2.3
 0.2
2021 2.1
 0.2
2022 2.6
 0.3
Thereafter 20.1
 1.9

The expected benefits to be paid are based on the same assumptions used to measure our benefit obligation at December 31, 2017, including the expected future employee service. We expect to contribute $2.2 million to the defined benefit planswhich may occur within the next year.

Net periodic pension cost consisted of the following (in millions):
 Pension Benefits Other Benefits
 Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
 December 31,
2017
 December 31, 2016 December 31,
2015
 June 27, 2015* December 31,
2017
 December 31, 2016 December 31,
2015
 June 27, 2015*
Service cost$4.5
 $4.1
 $2.2
 $0.9
 $0.6
 $0.6
 $0.3
 $0.3
Interest cost3.3
 3.6
 1.7
 2.4
 0.2
 0.2
 0.1
 0.2
Expected return on assets(4.3) (3.9) (1.8) (2.7) 
 
 
 
Curtailment(0.7) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net actuarial loss0.8
 0.5
 0.4
 1.0
 (0.1) 
 
 0.1
Net periodic pension cost$3.6
 $4.3
 $2.5
 $1.6
 $0.7
 $0.8
 $0.4
 $0.6

*    Includes Omega activitytwelve months - it is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits for certain tax positions taken on previously filed tax returns may change materially from March 30, 2015 to June 27, 2015

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 15


The weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic pension cost and benefit obligation were:
 Pension Benefits Other Benefits
 Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
 December 31,
2017
 December 31, 2016 December 31,
2015
 June 27, 2015* December 31,
2017
 December 31, 2016 December 31,
2015
 June 27, 2015*
Discount rate1.91% 1.76% 2.22% 2.11% 3.59% 4.00% 4.25% 4.25%
Inflation1.45% 1.43% 2.25% 1.93%        
Expected return on assets2.90% 2.89% 2.93% 2.85%        

*    Includes Omega activity from March 30, 2015 to June 27, 2015

The discount rate is based on market yields at the valuation date and chosen with reference to the yields available on high quality corporate bonds, having regard to the duration of the plan's liabilities.

As of December 31, 2017, the expected weighted-average long-term rate of return on assets of 2.9%was calculated based on the assumptions of the following returns for each asset class:
Equities6.0%
Bonds1.9%
Absolute return fund4.0%
Insurance contracts2.8%
Other2.5%

The investment mix of the pension plans' assets is a blended asset allocation, with a diversified portfolio of shares listed and traded on recognized exchanges.     

Certain of our plans have target asset allocation ranges,those recorded as of December 31, 20172021. However, we are not able to estimate a reasonably possible range of how these rangesevents
may impact our unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months.
Recent Tax Law Changes

On March 27, 2020, the U.S. enacted the CARES Act. The CARES Act allowed for an increased interest expense limitation and depreciation deductions resulting in a reduction of income tax expense of approximately $36.6 million for tax years 2019 and 2020. Additionally, Treasury and the IRS issued Proposed and Final Regulations in 2020 regarding interest expense limitations under Section 163(j). These regulations adjust the definition of interest expense and items allowable in adjusted taxable income to calculate the annual interest deduction limitation. Perrigo has applied the updated regulations resulting in a reduction of income tax expense of approximately $8.9 million during 2020.

On December 28, 2021, the U.S. Treasury and the IRS released final foreign tax credit regulations addressing various aspects of the foreign tax credit (“FTC”) regime. These regulations finalize, among other guidance, provisions relating to the disallowance of a credit or deduction for foreign income taxes with respect to dividends eligible for a dividends-received deduction; the allocation and apportionment of interest expense, foreign income tax expense; the definition of a foreign income tax and a tax in lieu of an income tax; transition rules relating to the impact on loss accounts of net operating loss carrybacks; the definition of foreign branch category income; and the time at which foreign taxes accrue and can be claimed as a credit. The regulations also contain clarifying rules relating to foreign-derived intangible income (FDII). These regulations are as follows:
Equities10% - 20%
Bonds20% - 30%
Absolute return50% - 60%

Other plansgenerally effective on March 7, 2022, with some provisions having retroactive effect. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we evaluated whether these final FTC regulations would have any effect on our income tax reporting for the year ended December 31, 2021, and applicable prior periods, and concluded that these final FTC regulations do not have target asset allocation ranges,result in any material changes to our income tax reporting for such plans the strategy isyear ended December 31, 2021 or for any prior periods.We will continue to invest primarily 100%evaluate the effects of these final FTC regulations on future accounting periods.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, "Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes." It removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Insurance Contracts.ASC Topic 740 and improves consistent application of and simplifies GAAP for other areas of ASC Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance. This guidance was effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2020. We adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2021, and the impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements was immaterial.


The purpose of the pension funds is to provide a flow of income for members in retirement. A flow of income delivered through fixed interest bonds provides a costly but close match to this objective. Equities are held within the portfolio as a means of reducing this cost, but holding equities creates a strategic risk because they give a very different pattern of return. Property investments are held to help diversify the portfolio. Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through annual liability measurements, periodic asset/liability studies, and investment portfolio reviews.


135

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1518



The following table sets forth the fair value of the pension plan assets, as of December 31, 2017 (in millions):
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets Other Observable Inputs Unobservable Inputs  
 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Total
Equities$0.1
 $19.1
 $
 $19.2
Bonds1.8
 30.2
 
 32.0
Insurance contracts
 
 50.8
 50.8
Absolute return fund
 54.5
 
 54.5
Other
 6.0
 
 6.0
Total$1.9
 $109.8
 $50.8
 $162.5

The following table sets forth the fair value of the pension plan assets, as of December 31, 2016 (in millions):
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets Other Observable Inputs Unobservable Inputs  
 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Total
Equities$0.1
 $13.6
 $
 $13.7
Bonds1.6
 22.8
 
 24.4
Insurance contracts
 
 43.4
 43.4
Absolute return fund
 51.5
 
 51.5
Other
 5.2
 
 5.2
Total$1.7
 $93.1
 $43.4
 $138.2

The following table sets forth the fair value of the pension plan assets, as of December 31, 2015 (in millions):
 Other Observable Inputs Unobservable Inputs  
 (Level 2) (Level 3) Total
Equities$14.5
 $
 $14.5
Bonds38.1
 
 38.1
Property
 0.3
 0.3
Insurance contracts
 34.9
 34.9
Absolute return fund33.7
 
 33.7
Other5.2
 
 5.2
Total$91.5
 $35.2
 $126.7

For a discussion of the fair value levels and the valuation methodologies used to measure equities, bonds, and the absolute return fund (refer to Note 6).

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 15


The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of the Level 3 pension plan assets, which were measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):
 Year Ended Six Months Ended
 December 31,
2017
 December 31, 2016 December 31,
2015
Assets at beginning of year$43.4
 $35.2
 $34.3
Actual return on plan assets1.0
 6.7
 0.1
Purchases, sales and settlements, net0.9
 (4.2) 2.1
Net transfers
 7.6
 
Foreign exchange5.5
 (1.9) (1.3)
Assets at end of year$50.8
 $43.4
 $35.2


All properties in the fund are valued by independent valuation experts by forecasting the returns of the market at regular intervals. The inputs to the forecasts include gross national product growth, interest rates and inflation.

The fair value of the insurance contracts is an estimate of the amount that would be received in an orderly sale to a market participant at the measurement date. The amount the plan would receive from the contract holder if the contracts were terminated is the primary input and is unobservable. The insurance contracts are therefore classified as Level 3 investments.

Deferred Compensation Plans

We have non-qualified plans related to deferred compensation and executive retention that allow certain employees and directors to defer compensation subject to specific requirements. Although the plans are not formally funded, we own insurance policies that had a cash surrender value of $34.6 million, $32.7 million and $34.6 million at December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016, andDecember 31, 2015, respectively, that are intended as a long-term funding source for these plans. The assets, which are recorded in Other non-current assets, are not a committed funding source and may, under certain circumstances, be subject to claims from creditors. The deferred compensation liability of $31.6 million, $29.3 million, and $34.5 million at December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016, andDecember 31, 2015, respectively, was recorded in Other non-current liabilities.

NOTE 1618 - POST-EMPLOYMENT PLANS

On December 31, 2020, we adopted ASU 2018-14: Compensation – Retirement Benefits – Defined Benefit Plans – General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans. The amendments in this ASU remove the disclosure of amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year. Additionally, Subtopic 715-20 adds disclosure requirements to explain the reasons for significant gains and losses related to changes in the benefit obligation for the period.

Defined Contribution Plans

We have a qualified profit-sharing and investment plan under Section 401(k) of the IRS, which covers substantially all U.S. employees. Our contributions to the plan include an annual nondiscretionary contribution of 3% of an employee's eligible compensation and a discretionary contribution at the option of the Board of Directors. Additionally, we match a portion of employees' contributions.

We also have a defined contribution plan that covers our Ireland employees. We contribute up to 18% of each participating employee’s annual eligible salary on a monthly basis.

We assumed a number of defined contribution plans associated with the Omega acquisition and we pay contributions to the pension insurance plans.

Our contributions to all of the plans were as follows (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31, 2019
$28.0 $27.3 $26.6 

Pension and Post-Retirement Healthcare Benefit Plans

We have a number of defined benefit plans for employees based primarily in Ireland, the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Switzerland, Greece and France.

Our defined benefit pension plans are managed externally and the related pension costs and liabilities are assessed at least annually in accordance with the advice of a qualified professional actuary. We used a December 31, 2021 measurement date and all plan assets and liabilities are reported as of that date.

We provide certain healthcare benefits to eligible U.S. employees and their dependents who meet certain age and service requirements when they retire. Generally, benefits are provided to eligible retirees after age 65 and to their dependents. Increases in our contribution for benefits are limited to increases in the Consumer Price Index. Additional healthcare cost increases are paid through participant contributions. We accrue the expected costs of such benefits during a portion of the employees’ years of service. The plan is not funded. Under current plan provisions, the plan is not eligible for any U.S. federal subsidy related to the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 Part D Subsidy.

136

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 18

The change in the projected benefit obligation and plan assets consisted of the following (in millions):
Pension BenefitsOther Benefits
Year EndedYear Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31, 2020December 31,
2021
December 31, 2020
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of period$214.3 $186.9 $3.5 $3.7 
Service costs3.9 2.7 — — 
Interest cost2.6 2.8 0.1 0.1 
Actuarial loss (gain)6.1 7.0 (0.5)(0.2)
Contributions paid0.3 0.2 — — 
Benefits paid(2.0)(2.3)(0.1)(0.1)
Settlements(7.9)— — — 
Foreign currency translation(14.7)17.0 — — 
Projected benefit obligation at end of period$202.6 $214.3 $3.0 $3.5 
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period189.1 165.4 — — 
Actual return on plan assets12.6 8.3 — — 
Benefits paid(2.0)(2.3)(0.1)(0.1)
Settlements(7.9)— — — 
Employer contributions2.7 2.3 0.1 0.1 
Contributions paid0.3 0.2 — — 
Foreign currency translation(13.1)15.2 — — 
Fair value of plan assets at end of period$181.7 $189.1 $— $— 
Unfunded status$(20.9)$(25.2)$(3.0)$(3.5)
Presented as:
Other non-current assets$21.2 $17.9 $— $— 
Current assets held for sale$0.4 $— $— $— 
Other non-current liabilities$(39.1)$(43.1)$— $— 
Current liabilities held for sale$(3.4)$— $— $— 
The total accumulated benefit obligation for the defined benefit pension plans was $194.9 million and $207.5 million at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 respectively.

The following information relates to pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31, 2020
Accumulated benefit obligation$104.7 $107.4 
Fair value of plan assets$70.0 $71.1 

137

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 18

The following information relates to pension plans with a projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31, 2020
Projected benefit obligation$112.5 $114.2 
Fair value of plan assets$70.0 $71.1 

The following unrecognized actual gain for the other benefits liability was included in OCI, net of tax (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31, 2020December 31,
2019
$0.6 $0.2 $2.6 

The unamortized net actuarial loss (gain) in AOCI net of tax for defined benefit pension and other benefits was as follows (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31, 2020December 31,
2019
$9.9 $11.6 $6.2 

There is no estimated credit amount to be recognized from AOCI into net periodic cost during the next year.

At December 31, 2021, the total estimated future benefit payments to be paid by the plans for the next five years is approximately $14.1 million for pension benefits and $0.9 million for other benefits as follows (in millions):

Payment DuePension BenefitsOther Benefits
2022$2.3 $0.1 
20232.2 0.2 
20242.9 0.2 
20253.1 0.2 
20263.6 0.2 
Thereafter28.5 1.0 

The expected benefits to be paid are based on the same assumptions used to measure our benefit obligation at December 31, 2021, including the expected future employee service. We expect to contribute $3.2 million to the defined benefit plans within the next year.

138

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 18

Net periodic pension cost consisted of the following (in millions):
Pension BenefitsOther Benefits
Year EndedYear Ended
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020December 31, 2019December 31, 2021December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Service cost$3.9 $2.7 $2.5 $— $— $0.6 
Interest cost2.6 2.8 3.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 
Expected return on assets(5.5)(4.9)(4.9)— — — 
Settlement1.1 — 0.9 — — — 
Curtailment— — (2.5)— — — 
Net actuarial loss/(gain)0.1 0.9 0.8 (1.4)(3.2)(0.3)
Net periodic pension cost/(gain)$2.2 $1.5 $0.6 $(1.3)$(3.1)$0.5 

The components of the net periodic pension cost, other than the service cost component, are included in the line item Other (income) expense, net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The increase in the discount rate from 0.95% to 1.18% has decreased the liability. This increase of 0.23% versus the discount rate used at December 31, 2020 is primarily attributable to the increase in bond yields across the Euro zone.

The weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic pension cost and benefit obligation were:
Pension BenefitsOther Benefits
Year EndedYear Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31, 2020December 31,
2019
December 31,
2021
December 31, 2020December 31,
2019
Discount rate1.18 %0.95 %1.06 %2.14 %3.14 %4.25 %
Inflation2.10 %1.33 %1.18 %
Expected return on assets1.55 %1.76 %2.54 %
Interest crediting rates0.34 %0.59 %0.83 %

The discount rate is based on market yields at the valuation date and chosen with reference to the yields available on high quality corporate bonds, with regards to the duration of the plan's liabilities.

As of December 31, 2021, the expected weighted-average long-term rate of return on assets of 1.6%was calculated based on the assumptions of the following returns for each asset class:

Equities5.0 %
Bonds1.5 %
Absolute return fund4.0 %
Insurance contracts1.4 %
Other0.9 %

The investment mix of the pension plans' assets is a blended asset allocation, with a diversified portfolio of shares listed and traded on recognized exchanges.     

Certain of our plans have target asset allocation ranges. As of December 31, 2021, these ranges were as follows:
Equities20%-30%
Bonds40%-50%
Absolute return10%-20%

139

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 18

Other plans do not have target asset allocation ranges, for such plans, the strategy is to invest mainly in Insurance Contracts.

The purpose of the pension funds is to provide a flow of income for members in retirement. A flow of income delivered through fixed interest bonds provides a costly but close match to this objective. Equities are held within the portfolio as a means of reducing this cost, but holding equities creates a strategic risk because they give a very different pattern of return. Property investments are held to help diversify the portfolio. Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through annual liability measurements, periodic asset/liability studies, and investment portfolio reviews.

The following table sets forth the fair value of the pension plan assets (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Level 1Level 2Level 3TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Equities$0.1 $41.2 $— $41.3 $— $42.8 $— $42.8 
Bonds1.0 42.5 — 43.5 1.2 43.0 — 44.2 
Insurance contracts— — 63.3 63.3 — — 64.2 64.2 
Absolute return fund— 23.7 — 23.7 — 30.8 — 30.8 
Other— 9.9 9.9 — 7.1 — 7.1 
Total$1.1 $117.3 $63.3 $181.7 $1.2 $123.7 $64.2 $189.1 

The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of the Level 3 pension plan assets, which were measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31, 2020
Assets at beginning of year$64.2 $56.1 
Actual return on plan assets1.9 1.9 
Purchases, sales and settlements, net1.1 1.2 
Foreign exchange(3.9)5.0 
Assets at end of year$63.3 $64.2 

The fair value of the insurance contracts is an estimate of the amount that would be received in an orderly sale to a market participant at the measurement date. The amount the plan would receive from the contract holder if the contracts were terminated is the primary input and is unobservable. The insurance contracts are therefore classified as Level 3 investments.

Deferred Compensation Plans

We have non-qualified plans related to deferred compensation and executive retention that allow certain employees and directors to defer compensation subject to specific requirements. Although the plans are not formally funded, we own insurance policies that had a cash surrender value of $38.4 million and $37.3 million at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, that are intended as a long-term funding source for these plans. The assets, which are recorded in Other non-current assets, are not a committed funding source and may, under certain circumstances, be subject to claims from creditors. The deferred compensation liability of $31.6 million and $34.2 million at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, was recorded in Other non-current liabilities.

NOTE 19 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


We lease certain assets, principally warehouse facilities and computer equipment, under agreements that expire at various dates through the year ended December 31, 2024.2040. Certain leases contain provisions for renewal and purchase options and require us to pay various related expenses. Future non-cancelable minimum operating lease commitments areThe annual future maturities of our leases as follows (in millions):of December 31, 2021 was $199.1 million (refer to Note 12).
140

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 19

Due Amount
2018 $38.1
2019 31.9
2020 24.3
2021 18.6
2022 13.7
Thereafter 16.6


Rent expense under all leases was $50.9$44.5 million, $53.0$41.7 million,, $26.2 million, and $39.2$41.0 million for the years ended December 31, 20172021, December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2016, the six months ended December 31, 2015, and the year endedJune 27, 2015,2019, respectively.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 16



At December 31, 2017,2021, we had non-cancelable purchase obligations totaling $771.0$865.6 million consisting of contractual commitments to purchase materials and services to support operations. The majority of the obligations are expected to be paid within one year.


In view of the inherent difficulties of predicting the outcome of various types of legal proceedings, we cannot determine the ultimate resolution of the matters described below. We establish reserves for litigation and regulatory matters when losses associated with the claims become probable and the amounts can be reasonably estimated. The actual costs of resolving legal matters may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts reserved for those matters. For matters where the likelihood or extent of a loss is not probable or cannot be reasonably estimated as of December 31, 2017,2021, we have not recorded a loss reserve. If certain of these matters are determined against us, there could be a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. We currently believe we have valid defenses to the claims in these lawsuits and intend to defend these lawsuits vigorously regardless of whether or not we have a loss reserve. Other than what is disclosed below, we do not expect the outcome of the litigation matters to which we are currently subject to, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. 

Antitrust Violations

We were named as a counterclaim co-defendant in the lawsuit Fera Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Akorn, Inc., et al. in the Southern District of New York, in which Akorn, Inc. (“Akorn”) alleged tortious interference and antitrust violations against us and Fera Pharmaceuticals, LLC (“Fera”). Trial was set for February 2018 in the Southern District of New York. This litigation arose out of our acquisition of bacitracin ophthalmic ointment from Fera in 2013. Akorn asserted claims under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act alleging that we and Fera conspired to monopolize, attempted to monopolize, and did unlawfully monopolize the market for sterile bacitracin ophthalmic ointment in the United States through the use of an exclusive agreement with a supplier of sterile bacitracin active pharmaceutical ingredient. The parties have executed a written settlement of all claims and the case has been dismissed.


Price-Fixing Lawsuits


Perrigo is a defendant in several cases in the generic pricing multidistrict litigation MDL No. 2724 (United States District Court for Eastern District of Pennsylvania). This multidistrict litigation, which has many cases that do not include Perrigo, includes class action and opt-out cases for federal and state antitrust claims, as well as complaints filed by certain states alleging violations of state antitrust laws.

On July 14, 2020, the court issued an order designating the following cases to proceed on a more expedited basis (as a bellwether) than the other cases in MDL No. 2724: (a) the May 2019 state case alleging an overarching conspiracy involving more than 120 products (which does not name Perrigo a defendant) and (b) class actions alleging “single drug” conspiracies involving Clomipramine, Pravastatin, and Clobetasol. Perrigo is a defendant in the Clobetasol cases but not the others. On February 9, 2021, the Court entered an order provisionally deciding to remove the May 2019 state case and the pravastatin class cases from the bellwether proceedings. On May 7, 2021, the Court ruled that the clobetasol end payer and direct purchaser class cases will remain part of the bellwether. The Court also ruled that the June 10, 2020 state complaint against Perrigo and approximately 35 other manufacturers will move forward as a bellwether case. The bellwether cases are proceeding in discovery, which must be completed by January 17, 2023 under the schedule set by the Court.No trial dates have been set for any of the bellwether cases, or any of the other cases in the MDL.

Class Action Complaints

(a) Single Drug Conspiracy Class Actions

We have been named as a co-defendant with certain other generic pharmaceutical manufacturers in a number of class actions alleging that we and other manufacturers of the same product engaged in anti-competitive behaviorsingle-product conspiracies to fix or raise the prices of certain drugs and/or allocate customers for those products starting, in some instances, as early as June 2013. The class actions were filed on behalf of putative classes of (a) direct purchasers, (b) end payors, and (c) indirect resellers. The products in question are Clobetasol gel, Desonide, and Econazole. TheseThe court denied motions to dismiss each of the complaints alongalleging “single drug” conspiracies involving Perrigo, and the cases are proceeding in discovery. As noted above, the Clobetasol cases have been designated to proceed on a more expedited schedule than the other cases. That schedule culminates with summary judgment motions due to be filed no later than November 16, 2023. No trial dates have been set for the Clobetasol cases, and no schedules have been set for the other “single drug” conspiracy cases.

(b) “Overarching Conspiracy” Class Actions

The same 3 putative classes, including (a) direct purchasers, (b) end payors, and (c) indirect resellers, have filed 2 sets of class action complaints filed againstalleging that Perrigo and other companies alleging pricemanufacturers (and some individuals) entered into an “overarching conspiracy” that involved allocating customers, rigging bids and raising, maintaining, and fixing withprices for various products. Each class brings claims for violations of Sections 1 and 3 of the Sherman
141

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 19

Antitrust Act as well as several state antitrust and consumer protection statutes.

Filed in June 2018, and later amended in December 2018 (with respect to more than two dozendirect purchasers) and April 2019 (with respect to end payors and indirect resellers), the first set of “overarching conspiracy” class actions include allegations against Perrigo and approximately 27 other manufacturers involving 135 drugs have been consolidated for pretrial proceedings as partwith allegations dating back to March 2011. The allegations against Perrigo concern only 2 formulations (cream and ointment) of a case captioned In re Generic Pharmaceuticals Pricing Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 27241 of the products at issue, Nystatin. The court denied motions to dismiss the first set of “overarching conspiracy” class actions, and they are proceeding in discovery. NaN of these cases are included in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern Districtgroup of Pennsylvania. Pursuantcases on a more expedited schedule pursuant to the court’s schedule staging various casesMay 17, 2021 order.

In December 2019, both the end payor and indirect reseller class plaintiffs filed a second set of "overarching conspiracy” class actions against Perrigo, dozens of other manufacturers of generic prescription pharmaceuticals, and certain individuals dating back to July 2009 (end payors) or January 2010 (indirect resellers). The direct purchaser plaintiffs filed their second round overarching conspiracy complaint in phases, we have movedFebruary 2020 with claims dating back to dismissJuly 2009. On March 11, 2020, the indirect reseller plaintiffs filed a motion to amend their second round December 2019 complaint, and that motion was granted. On September 4, 2020, and December 15, 2020, the end payor plaintiffs amended their second round complaint. On October 21, 2020, the direct purchaser plaintiffs amended their second round complaint. On December 15, 2020, the indirect reseller plaintiffs filed another complaint adding allegations for additional drugs that mirror the other class plaintiffs’ claims.

This second set of overarching complaints allege conspiracies relating to Clobetasolthe sale of various products that are not at issue in the earlier-filed overarching conspiracy class actions, the majority of which Perrigo neither makes nor sells. The amended indirect reseller complaint alleges that Perrigo conspired in connection with its sales of Betamethasone Dipropionate lotion, Imiquimod cream, Desonide cream and Econazole. We have also recently beenointment, and Hydrocortisone Valerate cream. The December 2020 indirect reseller complaint alleges that Perrigo conspired in connection with its sales of Adapalene, Ammonium Lactate, Bromocriptine Mesylate, Calcipotriene, Calcipotriene Betamethasone Dipropionate, Ciclopirox, Clindamycin Phosphate, Erythromycin, Fluticasone Propionate, Halobetasol Propionate, Hydrocortisone Acetate, Methazolamide, Mometasone Furoate, Prochlorperazine Maleate, Promethazine HCL, Tacrolimus, and Triamcinolone Acetonide. The amended end payor complaint alleges that Perrigo conspired in connection with its sale of the following drugs: Adapalene, Ammonium Lactate, Betamethasone Dipropionate, Bromocriptine Mesylate, Calcipotriene Betamethasone Dipropionate, Ciclopirox, Clindamycin Phosphate, Erythromycin, Fenofibrate, Fluocinonide, Fluticasone Propionate, Halobetasol Propionate, Hydrocortisone Acetate, Hydrocortisone Valerate, Imiquimod, Methazolamide, Mometasone Furoate, Permethrin, Prochlorperazine Maleate, Promethazine HCL, Tacrolimus, and Triamcinolone Acetonide. The amended direct purchaser complaint alleges that Perrigo conspired in connection with its sale of the following drugs: Adapalene, Ammonium Lactate, Betamethasone Dipropionate, Bromocriptine Mesylate, Ciclopirox, Clindamycin Phosphate, Fenofibrate, Fluocinonide, Halobetasol Propionate, Hydrocortisone Valerate, Methazolamide, Permethrin, Prochlorperazine Maleate, Promethazine HCL, Tacrolimus, and Triamcinolone Acetonide.

Perrigo has not yet responded to the second set of overarching conspiracy complaints, and responses are currently stayed.
Opt-Out Complaints

On January 22, 2018, Perrigo was named a defendantco-defendant along with 3135 other manufacturers in a complaint filed by three3 supermarket chains alleging that defendants conspired to fix prices of all31 generic prescription pharmaceutical products starting in 2013. On December 21, 2018, an amended complaint was filed that adds additional products and allegations against a total of 39 manufacturers for 33 products. The only allegations specific to Perrigo relate to Clobetasol, Desonide, Econazole, Nystatin cream, and Nystatin ointment. Perrigo moved to dismiss this complaint on February 21, 2019. The motion was denied on August 15, 2019. The case is proceeding in discovery. On February 3, 2020, the plaintiffs requested leave to file a second amended complaint. The proposed amended complaint adds dozens of additional products and allegations to the original complaint. Perrigo is discussed in connection with allegations concerning an additional drug, Fenofibrate. Defendants opposed the motion for leave to file a second amended complaint and the court has yet to rule on the issue.

On August 3, 2018, a large managed care organization filed a complaint alleging price-fixing and customer allocation concerning 17 different products among 27 manufacturers including Perrigo. The only allegations specific to Perrigo concern Clobetasol. Perrigo moved to dismiss this complaint on February 21, 2019. Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint in April 2019 that adds additional products and allegations. The amended allegations
142

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 19

that concern Perrigo include: Clobetasol, Desonide, Econazole, and Nystatin. The motion to dismiss was denied on August 15, 2019. The case is proceeding in discovery.

The same organization amended a different complaint that it had filed in October 2019, which did not name Perrigo, on December 15, 2020, adding Perrigo as a defendant and asserting new allegations of alleged antitrust violations involving Perrigo and dozens of other generic pharmaceutical manufacturers. The allegations relating to Perrigo concern: Adapalene, Betamethasone Dipropionate, Bromocriptine Mesylate, Ciclopirox, Clindamycin Phosphate, Fenofibrate, Fluocinonide, Halobetasol Propionate, Hydrocortisone Valerate, Imiquimod, Permethrin, Prochlorperazine Maleate, and Triamcinolone Acetonide.

The same organization filed a third complaint on December 15, 2020, naming Perrigo and dozens of other manufacturers alleging antitrust violations concerning generic pharmaceutical drugs. The allegations relating to Perrigo concern: Ammonium Lactate, Calcipotriene Betamethasone Dipropionate, Erythromycin, Fluticasone Propionate, Hydrocortisone Acetate, Methazolamide, Promethazine HCL, and Tacrolimus.

On January 16, 2019, a health insurance carrier filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota alleging a conspiracy to fix prices of 30 products among 30 defendants. The only allegations specific to Perrigo concerned Clobetasol gel, Desonide, Econazole, Nystatin cream, and Nystatin ointment. Perrigo has not yet responded to the complaint, and responses are currently stayed. On December 15, 2020, the complaint was amended to add additional defendants and claims. The new allegations that concern Perrigo relate to Fluocinonide.

The same health insurance carrier filed a new complaint on December 15, 2020, naming Perrigo and dozens of other manufacturers alleging antitrust violations concerning generic pharmaceutical drugs. The allegations relating to Perrigo concern: Adapalene, Ammonium Lactate, Betamethasone Dipropionate, Bromocriptine Mesylate, Calcipotriene Betamethasone Dipropionate, Ciclopirox, Clindamycin Phosphate, Erythromycin, Fluticasone Propionate, Halobetasol Propionate, Hydrocortisone Acetate, Hydrocortisone Valerate, Imiquimod, Methazolamide, Prochlorperazine Maleate, Promethazine HCL, Tacrolimus, and Triamcinolone Acetonide.

On July 18, 2019, 87 health plans filed a Praecipe to Issue Writ of Summons in Pennsylvania state court to commence an action against 53 generic pharmaceutical manufacturers and 17 individuals, alleging antitrust violations concerning generic pharmaceutical drugs. While Perrigo was named as a defendant, no complaint has been filed and the precise allegations and products at issue have not been identified. Proceedings in the case, including the filing of a complaint, have been stayed at the request of the plaintiffs.

On December 11, 2019, a health care service company filed a complaint against Perrigo and 38 other pharmaceutical companies alleging an overarching conspiracy to fix, raise or stabilize prices of dozens of products, most of which Perrigo neither makes nor sells. The product conspiracies allegedly involving Perrigo focus on the same products as those involved in other multi-district litigation ("MDL") complaints naming Perrigo: Clobetasol, Desonide, Econazole, and Nystatin cream/ointment. Perrigo has not yet responded to the complaint, and responses are currently stayed. On December 15, 2020, the complaint was amended to add additional defendants and claims. The new allegations relating to Perrigo concern: Adapalene, Ammonium Lactate, Betamethasone Dipropionate, Bromocriptine Mesylate, Calcipotriene Betamethasone Dipropionate, Ciclopirox, Clindamycin Phosphate, Erythromycin, Fenofibrate, Fluocinonide, Fluticasone Propionate, Halobetasol Propionate, Hydrocortisone Acetate, Hydrocortisone Valerate, Imiquimod, Methazolamide, Permethrin, Prochlorperazine Maleate, Promethazine HCL, Tacrolimus, and Triamcinolone Acetonide.

On December 16, 2019, a Medicare Advantage claims recovery company filed a complaint against Perrigo and 39 other pharmaceutical companies alleging an overarching conspiracy to fix, raise or stabilize prices of dozens of products, most of which Perrigo neither makes nor sells. The product conspiracies allegedly involving Perrigo focus on the same products as those involved in other MDL complaints naming Perrigo: Clobetasol, Desonide, and Econazole. The complaint was originally filed in the District of Connecticut but has been consolidated into the MDL. Perrigo has not yet had the opportunity to respond to the complaint, and responses are currently stayed. On December 15, 2020, the complaint was amended to add additional defendants and claims. The new allegations relating to Perrigo concern: Adapalene, Ammonium Lactate, Betamethasone Dipropionate, Bromocriptine Mesylate, Calcipotriene Betamethasone Dipropionate, Ciclopirox, Clindamycin Phosphate, Desoximetasone, Erythromycin, Fenofibrate, Fluocinonide, Fluticasone Propionate, Halobetasol Propionate, Hydrocortisone Acetate, Hydrocortisone Valerate, Imiquimod, Methazolamide, Permethrin, Prochlorperazine Maleate, Promethazine HCL, Tacrolimus, and Triamcinolone Acetonide.
143

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 19


On December 23, 2019, several counties in New York filed an amended complaint against Perrigo and 28 other pharmaceutical companies alleging an overarching conspiracy to fix, raise or stabilize prices of dozens products, most of which Perrigo neither makes nor sells. The product conspiracies allegedly involving Perrigo focus on the same products as those involved in other MDL complaints naming Perrigo: Clobetasol, Desonide, Econazole, and Nystatin. The complaint was originally filed in New York State court but was removed to federal court and has been consolidated into the MDL. Perrigo has not yet responded to the complaint, and responses are currently stayed. On December 15, 2020, the complaint was amended to add additional defendants and claims. The new allegations relating to Perrigo concern: Adapalene, Betamethasone Dipropionate, Bromocriptine Mesylate, Calcipotriene Betamethasone Dipropionate, Ciclopirox, Clindamycin Phosphate, Erythromycin, Fluticasone Propionate, Halobetasol Propionate, Hydrocortisone Acetate, Hydrocortisone Valerate, Imiquimod, Methazolamide, Mometasone Furoate, Nystatin, Permethrin, Prochlorperazine Maleate, Promethazine HCL, Tacrolimus, and Triamcinolone Acetonide. On June 30, 2021, the counties filed a proposed revised second amended complaint. Perrigo has not yet responded to the complaint, and responses are currently stayed.

On December 27, 2019, a healthcare management organization filed a complaint against Perrigo and 25 other pharmaceutical companies alleging an overarching conspiracy to fix, raise or stabilize prices of dozens of products, most of which Perrigo neither makes nor sells. The product conspiracies allegedly involving Perrigo focus on the same products as those involved in other MDL complaints naming Perrigo: Clobetasol, Desonide, Econazole, and Nystatin. The complaint was filed originally in the Northern District of California but has been consolidated into the MDL. Perrigo has not yet responded to the complaint, and responses are currently stayed. On December 15, 2020, the complaint was amended to add additional defendants and claims. The new allegations relating to Perrigo concern: Adapalene, Ammonium Lactate, Betamethasone Dipropionate, Bromocriptine Mesylate, Calcipotriene Betamethasone Dipropionate, Ciclopirox, Clindamycin Phosphate, Erythromycin, Fenofibrate, Fluticasone Propionate, Halobetasol Propionate, Hydrocortisone Acetate, Hydrocortisone Valerate, Imiquimod, Methazolamide, Permethrin, Prochlorperazine Maleate, Promethazine HCL, Tacrolimus, and Triamcinolone Acetonide.

On March 1, 2020, Harris County of Texas filed a complaint against Perrigo and 29 other pharmaceutical companies alleging an overarching conspiracy to fix, raise or stabilize prices of dozens of products, most of which Perrigo neither makes nor sells. The products at issue that plaintiffs claim Perrigo manufacturers or sells include: Adapalene, Betamethasone Dipropionate, Ciclopirox, Clindamycin, Clobetasol, Desonide, Econazole, Ethinyl Estradiol/Levonorgestrel, Fenofibrate, Fluocinolone, Fluocinonide, Gentamicin, Glimepiride, Griseofulvin, Halobetasol Propionate, Hydrocortisone Valerate, Ketoconazole, Mupirocin, Nystatin, Olopatadine, Permethrin, Prednisone, Promethazine, Scopolamine, and Triamcinolone Acetonide. The complaint was originally filed in the Southern District of Texas but has been transferred to the MDL. Harris County amended its complaint in May 2020. Perrigo has not yet responded to the complaint, and responses are currently stayed.

In May 2020, 7 health plans filed a writ of summons in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia concerning an as-yet unfiled complaint against Perrigo, 3 dozen other manufacturers, and 17 individuals, concerning alleged antitrust violations in connection with the pricing and sale of generic prescription pharmaceutical products. No complaint has yet been filed, so the precise allegations and products at issue are not yet clear. Proceedings in the case have been stayed.

On June 9, 2020, a health insurance carrier filed a complaint against Perrigo and 25 other manufacturers alleging an overarching conspiracy to allocate customers and/or fix, raise or stabilize prices of dozens of products, most of which Perrigo neither makes nor sells. The product conspiracies allegedly involving Perrigo focus on the same products as those involved in other MDL complaints naming Perrigo: Clobetasol, Desonide, Econazole, and Nystatin. The complaint was filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and has been transferred into the MDL. Perrigo has not yet responded to the complaint, and responses are currently stayed. On December 15, 2020, the complaint was amended to add additional defendants and claims. The new allegations relating to Perrigo concern: Adapalene, Ammonium Lactate, Betamethasone Dipropionate, Bromocriptine Mesylate, Calcipotriene Betamethasone Dipropionate, Ciclopirox, Clindamycin Phosphate, Erythromycin, Fluocinonide, Fluticasone Propionate, Halobetasol Propionate, Hydrocortisone Acetate, Hydrocortisone Valerate, Imiquimod, Methazolamide, Permethrin, Prochlorperazine Maleate, Promethazine HCL, Tacrolimus, and Triamcinolone Acetonide.

On July 9, 2020, a drugstore chain filed a complaint against Perrigo and 39 other pharmaceutical companies alleging an overarching conspiracy to fix, raise or stabilize prices of dozens of products, most of which Perrigo neither makes nor sells. The product conspiracies allegedly involving Perrigo focus on the same products as those involved in other MDL complaints naming Perrigo: Clobetasol, Desonide, Econazole, and Nystatin. Perrigo is
144

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 19

also listed in connection with Fenofibrate. The complaint was filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and will be transferred into the MDL. Perrigo has not yet responded to the complaint, and responses are currently stayed. On December 15, 2020, the complaint was amended to add additional defendants and claims. The new allegations relating to Perrigo concern: Adapalene, Ammonium Lactate, Betamethasone Dipropionate, Bromocriptine Mesylate, Calcipotriene Betamethasone Dipropionate, Ciclopirox, Clindamycin Phosphate, Erythromycin, Fenofibrate, Fluticasone Propionate, Halobetasol Propionate, Hydrocortisone Acetate, Hydrocortisone Valerate, Imiquimod, Methazolamide, Permethrin, Prochlorperazine Maleate, Promethazine HCL, Tacrolimus, and Triamcinolone Acetonide.

On August 27, 2020, Suffolk County of New York filed a complaint against Perrigo and 35 other manufacturers alleging an overarching conspiracy to allocate customers and/or fix, raise or stabilize prices of dozens of products, most of which Perrigo neither makes nor sells. The product conspiracies allegedly involving Perrigo focus on the same products as those involved in other MDL complaints naming Perrigo: Clobetasol, Desonide, Econazole, and Nystatin cream and ointment. The other products at issue that plaintiffs claim Perrigo manufacturers or sells include: Adapalene gel, Albuterol, Benazepril HCTZ, Clotrimazole, Diclofenac Sodium, Fenofibrate, Fluocinonide, Glimepiride, Ketoconazole, Meprobamate, Imiquimod, Triamcinolone Acetonide, Erythromycin/Ethyl Solution, Betamethasone Valerate, Ciclopirox Olamine, Terconazole, Hydrocortisone Valerate, Fluticasone Propionate, Desoximetasone, Clindamycin Phosphate, Halobetasol Propionate, Hydrocortisone Acetate, Promethazine HCL, Mometasone Furoate, and Amiloride HCTZ. The complaint was filed in the Eastern District of New York and has been transferred into the MDL. Perrigo has not yet responded to the complaint, and responses are currently stayed.

On September 4, 2020, a drug wholesaler and distributor filed a complaint against Perrigo and 39 other manufacturers alleging an overarching conspiracy to allocate customers and/or fix, raise or stabilize prices of dozens of products, most of which Perrigo neither makes nor sells. The product conspiracies allegedly involving Perrigo focus on Adapalene, Ammonium Lactate, Betamethasone Dipropionate, Bromocriptine Mesylate, Calcipotriene Betamethasone Dipropionate, Ciclopirox, Clindamycin, Clobetasol, Desonide, Econazole, Erythromycin, Fenofibrate, Fluticasone, Halobetasol, Hydrocortisone Acetate, Hydrocortisone Valerate, Imiquimod, Methazolamide, Mometasone furoate, Nystatin, Prochlorperazine, Promethazine HCL, Tacrolimus, and Triamcinolone Acetonide. The complaint was filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and has been transferred into the MDL. Perrigo has not yet responded to the complaint, and responses are currently stayed.

On December 11, 2020, a drugstore chain filed a complaint against Perrigo and 45 other manufacturers alleging an overarching conspiracy to allocate customers and/or fix, raise or stabilize prices of dozens of products, most of which Perrigo neither makes nor sells. The product conspiracies allegedly involving Perrigo focus on Adapalene, Ammonium Lactate, Betamethasone Dipropionate, Bromocriptine Mesylate, Calcipotriene Betamethasone Dipropionate, Ciclopirox, Clindamycin Phosphate, Clobetasol, Desonide, Econazole, Erythromycin, Fenofibrate, Fluticasone Propionate, Halobetasol, Hydrocortisone Acetate, Hydrocortisone Valerate, Imiquimod, Methazolamide, Nystatin, Permethrin, Prochlorperazine, Promethazine HCL, Tacrolimus, and Triamcinolone. The complaint was filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and has been transferred into the MDL.

On December 14, 2020, a supermarket chain filed a complaint against Perrigo and 45 other manufacturers (as well as certain individuals) alleging an overarching conspiracy to allocate customers and/or fix, raise or stabilize prices of dozens of products, most of which Perrigo neither makes nor sells. The product conspiracies allegedly involving Perrigo focus on Betamethasone Dipropionate, Bromocriptine Mesylate, Ciclopirox, Clindamycin Phosphate, Clobetasol, Desonide, Econazole, Fenofibrate, Halobetasol, Hydrocortisone Valerate, Nystatin, Permethrin, and Triamcinolone Acetonide. The complaint was filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and has been transferred into the MDL.

On December 15, 2020, a drugstore chain filed a complaint against Perrigo and 45 other manufacturers alleging an overarching conspiracy to allocate customers and/or fix, raise or stabilize prices of dozens of products, most of which Perrigo neither makes nor sells. The complaint lists 63 drugs that the chain purchased from Perrigo, but the product conspiracies allegedly involving Perrigo focus on Adapalene, Betamethasone Dipropionate, Bromocriptine Mesylate, Calcipotriene Betamethasone Dipropionate, Ciclopirox, Clindamycin Phosphate, Desonide, Econazole, Erythromycin, Fluocinonide, Fluticasone Propionate, Halobetasol, Hydrocortisone Acetate, Hydrocortisone Valerate, Imiquimod, Methazolamide, Nystatin, Prochlorperazine, Promethazine HCL, Tacrolimus, and Triamcinolone. The complaint was filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and has been transferred into the MDL.

145

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 19

On December 15, 2020, several counties in New York filed a complaint against Perrigo and 45 other pharmaceutical companies alleging an overarching conspiracy to fix, raise or stabilize prices of dozens products, most of which Perrigo neither makes nor sells. The allegations that concern Perrigo include: Adapalene, Betamethasone Dipropionate, Bromocriptine Mesylate, Calcipotriene Betamethasone Dipropionate, Ciclopirox, Clindamycin Phosphate, Erythromycin, Fluticasone Propionate, Halobetasol Propionate, Hydrocortisone Acetate, Hydrocortisone Valerate, Imiquimod, Methazolamide, Mometasone Furoate, Nystatin, Permethrin, Prochlorperazine Maleate, Promethazine HCL, Tacrolimus, and Triamcinolone Acetonide. The complaint was originally filed in New York State court but has been removed to federal court and consolidated into the MDL. The counties filed an amended complaint on June 30, 2021.

On August 30, 2021, the county of Westchester, NY filed a complaint in New York State court against Perrigo and 45 other pharmaceutical companies alleging an overarching conspiracy to fix, raise or stabilize prices of dozens products, most of which Perrigo neither makes nor sells. The allegations that concern Perrigo include: Adapalene, Betamethasone Dipropionate, Bromocriptine Mesylate, Calcipotriene Betamethasone Dipropionate, Ciclopirox, Clindamycin Phosphate, Clobetasol, Desonide, Econazole, Erythromycin, Fluticasone Propionate, Halobetasol Propionate, Hydrocortisone Acetate, Hydrocortisone Valerate, Imiquimod, Methazolamide, Mometasone Furoate, Nystatin, Permethrin, Prochlorperazine Maleate, Promethazine HCL, Tacrolimus, and Triamcinolone Acetonide. The case has been removed to federal court and consolidated into the MDL.

On October 8, 2021, approximately 20 health plans filed a Praecipe to Issue Writ of Summons in Pennsylvania state court to commence an action against 46 generic pharmaceutical manufacturers and 24 individuals, alleging antitrust violations concerning generic pharmaceutical drugs. While Perrigo was named as a defendant, no complaint has been filed and the precise allegations and products at issue have not been identified. Proceedings in the case, including the filing of a complaint, have not yet occurred.

State Attorney General Complaint

On June 10, 2020, the Connecticut Attorney General’s office filed a lawsuit on behalf of Connecticut and 50 other states and territories against Perrigo, 35 other generic pharmaceutical manufacturers, and certain individuals (including 1 former and 1 current Perrigo employee), alleging an overarching conspiracy to allocate customers and/or fix, raise or stabilize prices of 80 products. The allegations against Perrigo focus on the following drugs: Adapalene Cream, Ammonium Lactate cream and lotion, Betamethasone dipropionate lotion, Bromocriptine tablets, Calcipotriene Betamethasone Dipropionate Ointment, Ciclopirox cream and solution, Clindamycin solution, Desonide cream and ointment, Econazole cream, Erythromycin base alcohol solution, Fluticasone cream and lotion, Halobetasol cream and ointment, Hydrocortisone Acetate suppositories, Hydrocortisone Valerate cream, Imiquimod cream, Methazolamide tablets, Nystatin ointment, Prochlorperazine suppositories, Promethazine HCL suppositories, Tacrolimus ointment, and Triamcinolone cream and ointment. The Complaint was filed in the District of Connecticut, but has been transferred into the MDL. On May 7, 2021, the Court ruled that this case will move forward as a bellwether case. On September 9, 2021, the States filed an amended complaint, although the substantive allegations against Perrigo did not change. Perrigo moved to dismiss the Complaint on November 12, 2021. That motion is pending. The case is included among the “bellwether cases” designated to move on a more expedited schedule than the other cases in the MDL, and, as such, it will be subject to the January 17, 2023 discovery deadline and November 16, 2023 summary judgment deadline if the Complaint survives the pending motions to dismiss. Like the other cases in the MDL, no trial date has been set for this case.

Canadian Class Action Complaint

In June 2020, an end payor filed a class action in Ontario, Canada against Perrigo and 29 other manufacturers alleging an overarching conspiracy to allocate customers and/or fix, raise or stabilize prices of dozens of products, most of which Perrigo neither makes nor sells. The product conspiracies allegedly involving Perrigo focus on the same products as those involved in other MDL complaints naming Perrigo: Clobetasol, Desonide, Econazole, and Nystatin. In December 2020, Plaintiffs amended their complaint to add additional claims based on the State AG complaint of June 2020.

At this stage, we cannot reasonably predictestimate the outcome of the liability if any, associated with these claims.the claims listed above.


146

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 19

Securities Litigation
 
In the United States (cases related to events in 2015-2017)


On May 18, 2016, a shareholder filed a securities case against us and our former CEO, Joseph Papa, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey (Roofers’ Pension Fund v. Papa, et al.). The plaintiff purported to represent a class of shareholders for the period from April 21, 2015 through May 11, 2016, inclusive. The original complaint alleged violations of Securities Exchange Act sections 10(b) (and Rule 10b‑5)10b5) and 14(e) against both defendants and 20(a) control person liability against Mr. Papa. In general, the allegations concerned the actions taken by us and the former executive to defend against the unsolicited takeover bid by Mylan in the period from April 21, 2015 through November 13, 2015. The plaintiff also alleged that the defendants provided inadequate disclosure concerning alleged integration problems related to the Omega acquisition in the period from April 21, 2015 through May 11, 2016. On July 19, 2016, a different shareholder filed a securities class action against us and our former CEO, Joseph Papa, also in the District of New Jersey (Wilson v. Papa, et al.al.). The plaintiff purported to represent a class of persons who sold put options on our shares between April 21, 2015 and May 11, 2016. In
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 16


general, the allegations and the claims were the same as those made in the original complaint filed in the Roofers' Pension Fund case described above. On December 8, 2016, the court consolidated the Roofers' Pension Fund case and the Wilson case under the Roofers' Pension Fund case number. In February 2017, the court selected the lead plaintiffs for the consolidated case and the lead counsel to the putative class. In March 2017, the court entered a scheduling order.


On June 21, 2017, the court-appointed lead plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that superseded the original complaints in the Roofers’ Pension Fundcase and the Wilson case. TheIn the amended complaint, the lead plaintiffs seek to represent a class3 classes of shareholders: (i) shareholders forwho purchased shares during the period from April 21, 2015 through May 3, 2017 andon the amended complaint identifies three subclasses -U.S. exchanges; (ii) shareholders who purchased shares during the period on the U.S. exchanges; shareholders who purchased shares during thesame period on the Tel Aviv exchange; and (iii) shareholders who owned shares on theNovember 12, 2015 and held such stock through at least 8:00 a.m. on November 13, 2015 (the final day of the Mylan tender offer November 13, 2015.offer) regardless of whether the shareholders tendered their shares. The amended complaint names as defendants us and 11 current or former directors and officers of Perrigo (Mses. Judy Brown, Laurie Brlas, Jacqualyn Fouse, Ellen Hoffing, and Messrs. Joe Papa, Marc Coucke, Gary Cohen, Michael Jandernoa, Gerald Kunkle, Herman Morris, and Donal O’Connor). The amended complaint alleges violations of Securities Exchange Act sections 10(b) (and Rule 10b‑5) and 14(e) against all defendants and 20(a) control person liability against the 11 individuals. In general, the allegations concern the actions taken by us and the former executives to defend against the unsolicited takeover bid by Mylan in the period from April 21, 2015 through November 13, 2015 and the allegedly inadequate disclosure throughout the entire class period related to purported integration problems related to the Omega acquisition, alleges incorrect reporting of organic growth at the Company and at Omega, alleges price fixing activities with respect to six6 generic prescription pharmaceuticals, and alleges improper accounting for the Tysabri® royalty stream. The amended complaint does not include an estimate of damages. In AugustDuring 2017, the defendants filed motions to dismiss, which the amended complaint. The plaintiffs filed their oppositionopposed. On July 27, 2018, the court issued an opinion and order granting the defendants’ motions to dismiss in October 2017. The defendants filed replies in support ofpart and denying the motions to dismiss in November 2017.part. The court hasdismissed without prejudice defendants Laurie Brlas, Jacqualyn Fouse, Ellen Hoffing, Gary Cohen, Michael Jandernoa, Gerald Kunkle, Herman Morris, Donal O’Connor, and Marc Coucke. The court also dismissed without prejudice claims arising from the Tysabri® accounting issue described above and claims alleging incorrect disclosure of organic growth described above. The defendants who were not indicated whether theredismissed are Perrigo Company plc, Joe Papa, and Judy Brown. The claims (described above) that were not dismissed relate to the integration issues regarding the Omega acquisition, the defense against the Mylan tender offer, and the alleged price fixing activities with respect to 6 generic prescription pharmaceuticals. The defendants who remain in the case (the Company, Mr. Papa, and Ms. Brown) have filed answers denying liability, and the discovery stage of litigation began in late 2018. Discovery in the class action ended on January 31, 2021. In early April 2021, the defendants filed various post-discovery motions, including summary judgment motions; the briefing of which was completed in early July 2021. The motions are now before the court. The court will behold oral argument of the motions or whether the court will decide the motions on the papers.in April 2022. We intend to defend the lawsuit vigorously.


On November 1,14, 2019, the court granted the lead plaintiffs’ motion and certified 3 classes for the case: (i) all those who purchased shares between April 21, 2015 through May 2, 2017 Carmignac Gestion, S.A.,inclusive on a U.S. exchange and were damaged thereby; (ii) all those who purchased shares between April 21, 2015 through May 2, 2017 inclusive on the Tel Aviv exchange and were damaged thereby; and (iii) all those who owned shares as of November 12, 2015 and held such stock through at least 8:00 a.m. on November 13, 2015 (whether or not a person tendered shares in response to the Mylan tender offer) (the "tender offer class"). Defendants filed a securities lawsuit against uspetition for leave to appeal in the Third Circuit challenging the certification of the tender offer class. On April 30, 2020, the Third Circuit denied leave to appeal. The District Court has approved the issuance of a notice of the pendency of the class action, and three individuals (former Chairman and CEO Joseph Papa, former CFO Judy Brown, and former Executive Vice President and Board member Marc Coucke). This lawsuit is not a securities class action. The case is styled Carmignac Gestion, S.A. v. the notice has been sent to shareholders who are eligible to participate in the classes.
147

Perrigo Company plc et al., and was filed- Item 8
Note 19


In early July 2021, the Court assigned the securities class action case (Roofer’s case) to a new judge within the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. Unless otherwise noted, each of the lawsuits discussed in the following sections is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.Jersey and remains with the originally assigned judge. The allegations in the complaints relate to events during certain portions of the 2015 through 2017 calendar years, including the period of the Mylan tender offer. All but one of these lawsuits allege violations of federal securities laws, but none are class actions. NaN lawsuit (Highfields) alleges only state law claims. Discovery in all these cases, except Starboard Value and Highfields, ended in November, 2021. As of January 2022, the cases listed below pending in federal court in New Jersey are suspended pending the ruling on the summary judgment motions in the class action case (Roofers case). We intend to defend all these lawsuits vigorously.

Carmignac, First Manhattan and Similar Cases. The following 7 cases were filed by the same law firm and generally make the same factual assertions but, at times, differ as to which securities laws violations they allege:
CaseDate Filed
Carmignac Gestion, S.A. v. Perrigo Company plc, et al.11/1/2017
First Manhattan Co. v. Perrigo Company plc, et al.2/16/2018; amended 4/20/2018
Nationwide Mutual Funds, et al. v. Perrigo Company plc, et al.10/29/2018
Schwab Capital Trust, et al. v. Perrigo Company plc, et al.1/31/2019
Aberdeen Canada Funds -- Global Equity Fund, et al. v. Perrigo Company plc, et al.2/22/2019
Principal Funds, Inc., et al. v. Perrigo Company plc, et al.3/5/2020
Kuwait Investment Authority, et al. v. Perrigo Company plc, et al.3/31/2020

The original complaints in the Carmignac case and the First Manhattan case named Perrigo, Mr. Papa, Ms. Brown, and Mr. Coucke as defendants. Mr. Coucke was dismissed as a defendant after the plaintiffs agreed to apply the July 2018 ruling in the Roofers' Pension Fund case to these two cases. The complaints in each of the other cases name only Perrigo, Mr. Papa, and Ms. Brown as defendants.

Each complaint asserts claims under Securities Exchange Act sectionsSections 10(b) (and Rule 10b-5),10b-5 thereunder) and all cases except Aberdeen assert claims under Section 14(e), and 18 of the Securities Exchange Act against all defendants, as well as 20(a) control person liability under Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act against the individual defendants. In general,The control person claims against the plaintiff’s allegations focus on events duringindividual defendants are limited to the period from April 2015 through April 2016. Plaintiff contends that2016 in the defendants providedCarmignac case. The complaints in the Carmignac and First Manhattan cases also assert claims under Section 18 of the Exchange Act.

Each complaint alleges inadequate disclosure throughout the perioddisclosures concerning the valuation and integration of Omega, the financial guidance we provided, by us during that period, our reporting about the generic prescription pharmaceutical business and its prospects, and the activities surrounding the efforts to defeat the Mylan tender offer during 2015.2015, and, in each of the cases other than Carmignac, alleged price fixing activities with respect to 6 generic prescription pharmaceuticals. The First Manhattan complaint also alleges improper accounting for the Tysabri® asset. With the exception of Carmignac, each of these cases relates to events during the period from April 2015 through May 2017. Many of the allegations in this casethese cases overlap with the allegations of the June 2017 amended complaint in the Roofers’ Pension Fund case, described above. The plaintiff doesthough the Nationwide Mutual, Schwab Capital, Aberdeen, Principal Funds and Kuwait complaints do not provide an estimate of damages. We intend to defendinclude the lawsuit vigorously. The parties jointly requestedfactual allegations that the court stay thisdismissed in the July 2018 ruling in the Roofers' Pension Fund case.

After the court issued its July 2018 opinion in the Roofers’ Pension Fund case, pending the outcome ofparties in Carmignac and First Manhattan conferred and agreed that the ruling in the Roofers’ Pension Fund case would apply equally to the common allegations in their cases. The later filed cases adopted a ruling onsimilar posture. The defendants in theCarmignac and other cases listed above filed motions to dismiss filedaddressing the additional allegations in the Roofers' Pension Fund case (discussed above), andsuch cases. On July 31, 2019, the court granted such motions to dismiss in part and denied them in part. That ruling applies to each of the stay motion.above cases. The defendants have filed answers in each case denying liability. Discovery in these cases has ended.

On January 16, 2018, Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC filed a securities lawsuit against us and three individuals (former Chairman and CEO Joseph Papa, former CFO Judy Brown, and former Executive Vice President and Board member Marc Coucke). This lawsuit is not a securities class action. The case is styled Manning & Napier Advisors, LLC v.
148

Perrigo Company plc et al.- Item 8
Note 19

Mason Capital, Pentwater and wasSimilar Cases. The following 8 cases were filed by the same law firm and generally make the same factual allegations:
CaseDate Filed
Mason Capital L.P., et al. v. Perrigo Company plc, et al.1/26/2018
Pentwater Equity Opportunities Master Fund Ltd., et al.  v. Perrigo Company plc, et al.1/26/2018
WCM Alternatives: Event-Drive Fund, et al. v. Perrigo Co., plc, et al.11/15/2018
Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd., et al. v. Perrigo Co., plc, et al.11/15/2018
Discovery Global Citizens Master Fund, Ltd., et al. v. Perrigo Co. plc, et al.12/18/2019
York Capital Management, L.P., et al. v. Perrigo Co. plc, et al.12/20/2019
Burlington Loan Management DAC v. Perrigo Co. plc, et al.2/12/2020
Universities Superannuation Scheme Limited v. Perrigo Co. plc, et al.3/2/2020

The complaints in the U.S. District Court forMason Capital case and the DistrictPentwater case originally named Perrigo and 11 current or former directors and officers of New Jersey.Perrigo as defendants. In the July 2018 Roofers’ Pension Fund ruling, the court dismissed without prejudice each of the defendants other than Perrigo, Mr. Papa and Ms. Brown from that case; these plaintiffs later agreed that this ruling would apply to their cases as well. The complaints in each of the other cases in the above table name only Perrigo, Mr. Papa, and Ms. Brown as defendants.

Each complaint asserts claims under Section 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act sections 10(b) (and Rule 10b-5) and 18 against all defendants, as well as 20(a) control person liability under Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act against the individual defendants. In general,The complaints in the plaintiff’s allegations focus on eventsWCM case and the Universities Superannuation Scheme case also assert claims under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.

Each complaint alleges inadequate disclosure during the tender offer period from Aprilin 2015 through May 2017. Plaintiff contends that the defendants provided inadequate disclosureand at various times during the period concerning valuation and integration of Omega, the financial guidance provided by us during that period, alleged price fixing activities with respect to six6 generic prescription pharmaceuticals, and alleged improper accounting for the Tysabri® financial asset. The WCM complaint also makes these allegations for the period through May 2017 and the Universities Superannuation Scheme complaint also concerns certain times during 2016. Many of the factual allegations in this casethese cases overlap with the allegations of the June 2017 amended complaint in the Roofers'Roofers’ Pension Fund case, and the Mason Capital and Pentwater cases include factual allegations similar to those in the Carmignac case described above. The plaintiff does not provide an estimate

After the court issued its July 2018 opinion in the Roofers’ Pension Fund case, the parties in each of damages. We intend to defend the lawsuit vigorously. The parties jointly requestedabove casesconferred and agreed that the ruling in the Roofers’ Pension Fund case would apply equally to the common allegations in their cases. The defendants in each of these cases have filed answers denying liability, and the discovery phase in each of these cases has ended.

Harel Insurance and TIAA-CREF Cases. The following 2 cases were filed by the same law firm and generally make the same factual allegations relating to the period from February 2014 through May 2017 (in the Harel case) and from August 2014 through May 2017 (in the TIAA-CREF case):
CaseDate Filed
Harel Insurance Company, Ltd., et al. v. Perrigo Company plc, et al.2/13/2018
TIAA-CREF Investment Management, LLC., et al. v. Perrigo Company plc, et al.4/20/2018

The complaints in the Harel and TIAA-CREF cases originally named Perrigo and 13 current or former directors and officers of Perrigo as defendants (adding 2 more individual defendants not sued in the other cases described in this section). In the July 2018 Roofers’ Pension Fund ruling, the court stay this case pendingdismissed without prejudice 8 of the outcome11 defendants other than Perrigo, Mr. Papa and Ms. Brown from that case. These plaintiffs later agreed that that ruling would apply to these cases as well and also dismissed their claims against the two additional individuals that only these plaintiffs had named as defendants.

Each complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 14(e) of athe Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder against all defendants, as well as control person liability under Section 20(a) of the Securities
149

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1619



ruling onExchange Act against the motion to dismiss filedindividual defendants. The complaint in the Roofers'Harel case also asserts claims based on Israeli securities laws.

Each of the complaints alleges inadequate disclosure around the tender offer events in 2015 and at various times during the relevant periods concerning valuation and integration of Omega, the financial guidance provided by us during that period, alleged price fixing activities with respect to 6 generic prescription pharmaceuticals, and alleged improper accounting for the Tysabri® asset from February 2014 until the withdrawal of past financial statements in April 2017.

After the court issued its July 2018 opinion in the Roofers’ Pension Fund case, (discussed above),the parties in the Harel and TIAA-CREF cases conferred and agreed that such ruling would apply equally to the common allegations in their cases. The defendants in each of these cases have filed answers denying liability, and the court granteddiscovery phase in each of these cases has ended.

Other Cases Related to Events in 2015-2017. Certain allegations in the stay motion.

On January 26, 2018, two different plaintiff groups (the Mason Capital group andfollowing 3 cases also overlap with the Pentwater group) each filed a lawsuit against us andallegations of the same individuals who are defendants in theJune 2017 amended complaint in the securities class actionRoofers' Pension Fund case described above (Roofers’ Pension Fund case). The same law firm represents these two plaintiff groups, and the two complaints are substantially similar. These two cases are not securities class actions. One case is styled Mason Capital L.P., et al. v. Perrigo Company plc, et al., and was filedwith allegations in the U.S. District Court for the District1 or more of New Jersey. The other case is styled Pentwater Equity Opportunities Master Fund Ltd., et al.  v. Perrigo Company plc, et al., and also was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. Both cases are assigned to the same federal judge that is hearing the class action case and the other individual cases described in the sections above:
CaseDate Filed
Sculptor Master Fund (f/k/a OZ Master Fund, Ltd.), et al. v. Perrigo Company plc, et al.2/6/2019
Highfields Capital I LP, et al. v. Perrigo Company plc, et al.6/4/2020
BlackRock Global Allocation Fund, Inc., et al. v. Perrigo Co. plc, et al.4/21/2020
Starboard Value and Opportunity C LP, et al. v. Perrigo Company plc, et al.2/25/2021

Each of the above (Carmignac complaints names Perrigo, Mr. Papa, and Manning & Napier). EachMs. Brown as defendants.

The Sculptor Master Fund (formerly OZ) complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder against all defendants, as well as control person liability under Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act against the individual defendants. The parties have agreed that the court's rulings in July 2018 in the Roofers' Pension Fund case and in July 2019 in the Carmignac and related cases will apply to this case as well. The defendants have filed answers denying liability. The plaintiffs participated in the discovery proceedings in the Roofers' Pension Fund case and the various individual cases described above. The discovery phase in this case has ended.

The BlackRock Global complaint also asserts claims under Securities Exchange Act sectionssection 10(b) (and Rule 10b-5) and section 14(e) (related to tender offer disclosures) against all defendants as well asand section 20(a) control person liabilityclaims against the individual defendants. In general,defendants largely based on the plaintiff’s allegations describesame events during the period from April 2015 through May 2017. Plaintiff contendsPlaintiffs contend that the defendants provided inadequate disclosure during the tender offer period in 2015 and point to disclosures at various times during the period concerning valuation and integration of Omega, the financial guidance provided by us during that period, alleged price fixing activities with respect to six6 generic prescription pharmaceuticals, alleged lower performance in the generic prescription drug business during 2015 and alleged improper accounting for the Tysabri® financial asset. Many of the factual allegations in these two cases overlap with the allegations of the June 2017 amended complaintThe defendants have filed answers denying liability. The plaintiffs participated in the discovery proceedings in the Roofers' Pension Fund case described above and the allegations in the Carmignac casevarious individual cases described above. The plaintiff does not provide an estimate of damages. discovery phase in this case has ended.

The partiesStarboard Value and Opportunity C LP complaint also asserts claims under Securities Exchange Act section 10(b) (and Rule 10b-5) against all defendants and section 20(a) control person claims against the individual defendants based on events related to each case jointly requestedalleged price fixing activities with respect to generic prescription drugs during periods that overlap to some extent with the period alleged in the various other cases described above. Plaintiffs contend that the defendants provided inadequate disclosure during 2016 about generic prescription drug business and those alleged matters. The lawsuit was filed on February 25, 2021; but by agreement the case was administratively terminated by the court stay each casein June 2021 pending the outcome of a rulingdecision on the same defendants’ motions to dismiss filedcurrently pending before the court in the Roofers’ Pension Fund case (discussed above). The court granted the stay motion in each case. We intend to defend both lawsuits vigorously.

On February 13, 2018, a group of plaintiff investors affiliated with Harel Insurance Investments & Financial Services, Ltd. filed a lawsuit against us and the same individuals who are defendants in the amended complaint in the securities class action case described above (Roofers’ Pension Fund case). The new complaint is substantially similar to the amended complaint in the Roofers' Pension Fund case.  case described above.

The relevant period in Highfields federal case complaint asserted claims under Sections 14(e) and 18 of the new complaint stretches from February 2014 to May 2, 2017. The complaint addsSecurities Exchange Act against all defendants, as defendants two individuals who served on our Board prior to 2016. The case is styled Harel Insurance Company, Ltd., et al. v. Perrigo Company plc, et al., and waswell as control person liability under Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act against the individual defendants. As originally filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey and is assigned toMassachusetts, the same federal judge that is hearing the class action cases and the four other individual cases described above (Carmignac, Manning & Napier, Mason Capital, and Pentwater). The Harel Insurance Company Highfields complaint assertsalso alleged claims under Securities Exchange Act section 10(b) (and related SEC Rule 10b‑5)the Massachusetts Unfair Business Methods Law (chapter 93A) and section 14(e) (relatedMassachusetts common law claims of tortious interference with prospective economic
150

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 19

advantage, common law fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and unjust enrichment. The factual allegations generally were similar to tender offer disclosures) against all defendants as well as 20(a) control person liability against the individual defendants. The complaint also asserts claims based on Israeli securities laws. In general, the plaintiff’s allegations describe events during the period from February 2014 through May 2017. Plaintiff contends that the defendants provided inadequate disclosure during the tender offer events in 2015 and point to disclosures at various times during the period concerning valuation and integration of Omega, the financial guidance provided by us during that period, alleged price fixing activities with respect to six generic prescription pharmaceuticals, and alleged improper accounting for the Tysabri® financial asset from February 2014 until the withdrawal of past financial statements in April 2017. Many of the factual allegations in these two cases overlap with the allegations of the June 2017 amended complaintAmended Complaint in the Roofers' Pension Fund case described above, andexcept that the Highfields plaintiffs did not include allegations inabout alleged collusive pricing of generic prescription drugs. In March 2020, the four opt out cases also described above. The plaintiff does not provide an estimateDistrict of damages. The parties jointly filed a stay motion similar to the stay sought in the five other opt out cases. TheMassachusetts court granted defendants’ motion and transferred the stay motion. We intendcase to defend the lawsuit vigorously.

On February 16, 2018, First Manhattan Company filed a securities lawsuit against us and three individuals (former Chairman and CEO Joseph Papa, former CFO Judy Brown, and former Executive Vice President and Board member Marc Coucke). This lawsuit is not a securities class action. The case is styled First Manhattan Co. v. Perrigo Company plc, et al., and was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.Jersey so that the activities in the case could proceed in tandem with the other cases in the District of New Jersey described above. After the transfer, in June 2020, the Highfields plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their federal lawsuit. The case was assigned tosame Highfields plaintiffs the same judge hearing the class action case and the five other opt out cases. The complaint asserts claims under Securities Exchange Act sections 10(b) (and Rule 10b-5), 14(e), and 18 against all defendants as well as 20(a) control person liability against the individual defendants. In general, the plaintiff’s allegations focus on events during the period from April 2015 through May 2017. Plaintiff contends that the defendants provided inadequate disclosure at various times during the period concerning valuation and integration of Omega, the financial guidance provided by us during that period, alleged price fixing activities with respect to six generic prescription pharmaceuticals, and alleged improper accounting for the Tysabri® financial asset. Thisday then filed a new lawsuit was
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 16


filed by the same law firm that filed the Manning & Napier Advisors case and the Carmignac case described above and generally makesin Massachusetts State Court asserting the same factual assertionsallegations as in their federal lawsuit and alleging only Massachusetts state law claims under the Manning & Napier Advisors case. ManyMassachusetts Unfair Business Methods Law (chapter 93A) and Massachusetts common law claims of tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, common law fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and unjust enrichment. Defendants’ motion to dismiss was fully briefed as of late November 2020, argument occurred in early May 2021. In December 2021, the allegationsMassachusetts State Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss in part and denied it in part. Defendants’ filed their answers in January 2022 denying liability. The discovery phase in this case overlap with thehas begun (including discovery related to some factual allegations that were not part of the June 2017 amended complaintdiscovery in the Roofers' Pension Fund case described above. The plaintiff does not provide an estimate of damages. We intend to defend the lawsuit vigorously. The parties jointly requested that the court stay this case pending the outcome of a ruling on the motions to dismiss filedactions in the Roofers’ Pension Fund case (discussed above)New Jersey federal court). The court granted the stay motion. 


In Israel (cases related to events in 2015-2017)


Because our shares are traded on the Tel Aviv exchange under a dual trading arrangement, we are potentially subject to securities litigation in Israel. ThreeNaN cases were filed; two were1 was voluntarily dismissed in each of 2017 and one2018 and 1 was stayed.stayed in 2018. We are consulting with Israeli counsel about our response to these allegations and we intend to defend these casesthis case vigorously.


On May 22, 2016, shareholders filed a securities class action against us and five individual defendants: Our former CEO Mr. Papa, our former Executive Vice President and General Manager of the BCH segment Marc Coucke, our then Chief Executive Officer John Hendrickson, our former Board member Gary Kunkle, Jr., and our Board member Laurie Brlas alleging violations of Israeli law in the District Court of Tel Aviv-Jaffa (Schweiger et al. v. Perrigo Company plc, et al.). On June 15, 2016, we filed a motion to stay the case pending the outcome of the securities class action pending in the New Jersey Federal Court. The plaintiffs did not oppose the motion. The Israeli court granted the motion on the same day, and the Schweiger action was stayed. In October 2017, the Schweiger plaintiffs dismissed their claims without prejudice because of the pendency of another class action case filed in Israel (see discussion below of the Israel Elec. Corp. Employees’ Educ. Fund case). The court approved the voluntary dismissal. 

On March 29, 2017, plaintiff Eyal Keinan commenced an action in the District Court of Tel Aviv-Jaffa asserting securities claims against two defendants: Perrigo and its auditor Ernst & Young LLP ("EY"). The case is styled Keinan v. Perrigo Company plc, et al. The action sought certification of a class of purchasers of Perrigo shares on the Israeli exchange beginning February 6, 2014. The proposed closing date for the class was not clear from the complaint though it appeared to extend into 2017. In general, the plaintiff asserted that we improperly accounted for our stream of royalty income from two drugs: Tysabri® and Prialt. The court filings contended that the alleged improper accounting caused the audited financial results for Perrigo to be incorrect for the six month period ended December 31, 2015, and the years ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 and the other financial data released by us over those years and 2016 to also be inaccurate. The plaintiff maintained that the defendants are liable under Israeli securities law or, in the alternative, under U.S. securities law. The plaintiff indicated an initial, preliminary class damages estimate of 686.0 million NIS (approximately $192.0 million at 1 NIS = $0.28 cent). In January 2018, the Keinan plaintiff announced its intention to dismiss his claims because of the pendency of another class action case filed in Israel (see discussion below of the Israel Elec. Corp. Employees’ Educ. Fund case). The court granted the dismissal on February 11, 2018.

On June 28, 2017, a plaintiff filed a complaint in Tel Aviv District Court styled Israel Elec. Corp. Employees’ Educ. Fund v. Perrigo Company plc, et al.The lead plaintiff seeks to represent a class of shareholders who purchased Perrigo stock on the Tel Aviv exchange during the period from April 24, 2015 through May 3, 2017 and also a claim for those that owned shares on the final day of the Mylan tender offer (November 13, 2015). The amended complaint names as defendants the Company, EYErnst & Young LLP (the Company’s auditor), and 11 current or former directors and officers of Perrigo (Mses. Judy Brown, Laurie Brlas, Jacqualyn Fouse, Ellen Hoffing, and Messrs. Joe Papa, Marc Coucke, Gary Cohen, Michael Jandernoa, Gerald Kunkle, Herman Morris, and Donal O’Connor). The complaint alleges violations under U.S. securities laws of Securities Exchange Act sections 10(b) (and Rule 10b‑5) and 14(e) against all defendants and 20(a) control person liability against the 11 individuals or, in the alternative, under Israeli securities laws. In general, the allegations concern the actions taken by us and our former executives to defend against the unsolicited takeover bid by Mylan in the period from April 21, 2015 through November 13, 2015 and the allegedly inadequate disclosure concerning purported integration problems related to the Omega acquisition, alleges incorrect reporting of organic growth at the Company, alleges price fixing activities with respect to six6 generic prescription pharmaceuticals, and alleges improper accounting for the Tysabri®Tysabri® royalty stream. The plaintiff indicates an initial, preliminary class damages estimate of 2.7 billion NIS (approximately $760.0 million at 1 NIS = $0.28 cent)0.28 cents). After the other 2 cases filed in Israel were voluntarily dismissed, the plaintiff in this case agreed to stay this case pending the outcome of the Roofers’ Pension Fund case in the U.S. (described above). The Israeli court approved the stay, and this case is now stayed. We intend to defend the lawsuit vigorously.


In the United States (cases related to Irish Tax events)

On January 3, 2019, a shareholder filed a complaint against the Company, our CEO Murray Kessler, and our former CFO Ronald Winowiecki in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Masih v. Perrigo Company, et al.). Plaintiff purported to represent a class of shareholders for the period November 8, 2018 through December 20, 2018, inclusive. The complaint alleged violations of Securities Exchange Act section 10(b) (and Rule 10b‑5) against all defendants and section 20(a) control person liability against the individual defendants. In general the allegations contended that the Company, in its Form 10-Q filed November 8, 2018, disclosed information about an October 31, 2018 audit finding letter received from Irish tax authorities but failed to disclose enough material information about that letter until December 20, 2018, when we filed a current report on Form 8‑K about Irish tax matters. The plaintiff did not provide an estimate of class damages. The court selected lead plaintiffs and changed the name of the case to In re Perrigo Company plc Sec. Litig. The lead plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on April 12, 2019, which named the same defendants, asserted the same class period, and invoked the same Exchange Act sections. The amended complaint generally repeated the allegations of the original complaint with a few additional details and adds that the defendants also failed to timely disclose the Irish tax authorities’ Notice of Amended Assessment received on November 29, 2018. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on May 3, 2019. On May 31, 2019, the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint, which asserted a longer class period (March 1, 2018 through December 20, 2018) and added 1 additional individual defendant, former CEO Uwe Roehrhoff. In general, the second amended complaint contended that Perrigo’s disclosures about the Irish tax audit were inadequate
151

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1619



beginning with Perrigo’s 10-K filed on March 1, 2018 through December 20, 2018 and repeated many of the allegations of the April 2019 amended complaint. The second amended complaint alleged violations of Securities Exchange Act section 10(b) (and Rule 10b-5) against all defendants and section 20(a) control person liability against the 3 individual defendants. All defendants filed a joint motion to dismiss, and the motion was fully briefed. On January 23, 2020, the court granted the motion to dismiss in part and denied it in part, dismissing Mr. Roehrhoff as a defendant and dismissing allegations of inadequate disclosures related to the audit by Irish Revenue during the period March 2018 through October 30, 2018. The court permitted the plaintiffs to pursue their claims against us, Mr. Kessler, and Mr. Winowiecki related to disclosures after Perrigo received the October 30, 2018 audit findings letter and later events through December 20, 2018. The defendants filed answers on February 13, 2020 denying liability, and the court issued a scheduling order on March 3, 2020 that was subsequently modified. Discovery on the remaining issues ended in early March 2021. Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification, which was granted in September 2020. In January 2021, class plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a third amended complaint in an effort to revive their claim that the disclosure of the audit during the period from March 1, 2018 to October 30, 2018 was also inadequate. The court denied the motion in February 2021. Defendants filed motions for summary judgement and other post discovery motions on March 31, 2021 and plaintiffs filed cross-motions of the same type on the same day. All motions were fully briefed by late May 2021. During the week of July 11, 2021, the Court issued various opinions and orders denying some of the motions by both parties, and granting in part certain motions by plaintiffs. Defendants filed a motion for reconsideration for some of the rulings in late July, which the court granted in part in August. The court also indicated that the parties should prepare for trial in mid-October 2021 (subject to COVID-19 developments), without setting an exact trial date.

The court simultaneously ordered mediation, which led to a settlement that the parties first publicly announced in a court filing on September 8, 2021. Trial was cancelled when a settlement was reached. Motion papers seeking approval of the class action settlement were filed on October 4, 2021. The court issued a preliminary approval order on October 29, 2021, which lead to the issuance of notices to class members. Class plaintiffs filed papers in January 2022 seeking final approval of the settlement. The Court held a hearing on February 16, 2022 about the settlement and issued the Final Approval Order and Judgment. As a result, the settlement has been approved and the case has now ended. The settlement has been funded by insurance.

In Israel (case related to Irish Tax events)

On July 12, 2017,December 31, 2018, a shareholder filed an action against the plaintiffCompany, our CEO Murray Kessler, and our former CFO Ronald Winowiecki in the Israel Elec. Corp. Employees’ Educ. FundTel Aviv District Court (Baton v. Perrigo Company plc, et al.et. al.). The case is a securities class action brought in Israel making similar factual allegations for the same period as those asserted in the In re Perrigo Company plc Sec. Litig case in New York federal court. This case alleges that persons who invested through the Tel Aviv stock exchange can assert claims under Israeli securities law that will follow the liability principles of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act. The plaintiff does not provide an estimate of class damages. In 2019, the court granted 2 requests by Perrigo to stay the proceedings pending the resolution of proceedings in the United States. Perrigo filed a further request for a stay in February 2020, and the court granted the stay indefinitely. The plaintiff filed a motion to have all three cases pending in Israel either consolidated orlift the other two cases dismissed sostay then later agreed that the Israel Elec. Corp. Educ. Fund plaintiff can proceed ascase should remain stayed through February 2021. The stay continued in place during 2021. After the sole plaintiff. In October 2017, the Schweiger plaintiffs (see description above) voluntarily dismissed their securities class action without prejudice as part of their response to the motion filed by the Israel Elec. Corp. Educ. Fund plaintiff. A variety of other procedural motions were also pending having to do with the timing of any response by defendants. The court held an initial conference on November 9, 2017 to address the motion filed by the Israel Elec. Corp. Educ. Fund plaintiff. Subsequently, the competing class plaintiffs held discussions and informed the court in January 2018 that they had reached an agreement among themselves such that the Education Fund case will continue while the Keinan plaintiff will dismiss its case. The court approved this outcome. At the requestsettlement of the parties, the court has stayed the Education Fund case pending the final adjudication of the class action case in DNJ (the Roofers’ Pension FundU.S. case described above under Securities Litigation (In re Perrigo Company plc Sec. Litig.), Perrigo’s counsel informed the United States). The court approved the stay.

Eltroxin

During October and November 2011, nine applications to certify a class action lawsuit were filed in various courts in Israel related to Eltroxin, a prescription thyroid medication manufactured by a third party and distributed in Israel by our subsidiary, Perrigo Israel Agencies Ltd. The respondents included our subsidiaries, Perrigo Israel Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and/or Perrigo Israel Agencies Ltd., the manufacturersIsraeli Court of the product, and various healthcare providers who provide healthcare services as part of the compulsory healthcare system in Israel.

One of the applications was dismissed and the remaining eight applications were consolidated into one application. The applications arose from the 2011 launch of a reformulated version of Eltroxin in Israel. The consolidated application generally alleges that the respondents (a) failed to timely inform patients, pharmacists and physicians about the change in the formulation; and (b) failed to inform physicians about the need to monitor patients taking the new formulation in order to confirm patients were receiving the appropriate dose of the drug. As a result, claimants allege they incurred the following damages: (a) purchases of product that otherwise would not have been made by patients had they been aware of the reformulation; (b) adverse events to some patients resulting from an imbalance of thyroid functions that could have been avoided; and (c) harm resulting from the patients' lack of informed consent prior to the use of the reformulation.

Several hearings on whether or not to certify the consolidated application took place in December 2013 and January 2014. On May 17, 2015, the District Court certified the motion against Perrigo Israel Agencies Ltd. and dismissed it against the remaining respondents, including Perrigo Israel Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

On June 16, 2015, we submitted a motion for permission to appeal the decision to certify to the Israeli Supreme Court together with a motion to stay the proceedings of the class action until the motion for permission to appeal is adjudicated. We have filed our statement of defense to the underlying proceedings. The parties are currently engaged in mediation in an attempt to settle the matter. The underlying proceedings have been stayed pending the outcome of the mediation process and, if necessary, a decision on the motion to appeal.

On November 14, 2017 the Parties submitted the agreed settlement agreement to thefinal approval of the Supremesettlement of the U.S. case. The Court which referred the approval back to the District Court. During three hearings that took place on November 29, 2017, December 13, 2017 and January 11, 2018 the District Court opined that it would approve the settlement agreement subject to certain amendments to be proposed by the Court (which would not impact the monetary settlement reached) and set a hearing for January 30, 2018 to discuss and finalize the proposed changes. Meanwhile, the Courthas ordered the settlementplaintiff to be (1) provided to the Attorney General for review (standard procedure); and (2) publishedfile papers in the written media (newspapers), to enable the class members to submit any objections or “opt-out” to  the proposed settlement by February 15, 2018.

On February 21, 2018, the District Court held a hearing to, among others, review objections received from class members who had notified the District Court of their desire to opt out of the settlement. In addition, a representative of the Israeli Attorney General’s office notified the District Court that, based upon their preliminary examination of the settlement, theyresponse no later than March 6, 2022. We intend to object to the settlement in its current form. The District Court recommended that the parties continue to discuss and minimize objections to the settlement and scheduled another hearing for May 13, 2018.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 16



Tysabri® Product Liability Lawsuits

We and our collaborator Biogen are co-defendants in product liability lawsuits arising out of the occurrence of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy, a serious brain infection, and serious adverse events, including deaths, which occurred in patients taking Tysabri®. Each co-defendant would be responsible for 50% of losses and expenses arising out of any Tysabri® product liability claims. During calendar year 2016, one case in the U.S. was settled and two others were dismissed with prejudice. In 2017, seven other cases were dismissed with prejudice. While we intend to vigorously defend the remaining lawsuits, management cannot predict how these cases will be resolved. Adverse results in one or more of these lawsuits could result in substantial judgments against us.lawsuit vigorously.

Claim Arising from the Omega Acquisition


On December 16, 2016, we and Perrigo Ireland 2 brought an arbitral claim ("Claim") against Alychlo NV ("Alychlo") and Holdco I BE NV ("Holdco") (together the Sellers)"Sellers") in accordance with clause 26.2 of the Share Purchase Agreement dated November 6, 2014 ("SPA") and the rules of the Belgian Centre for Arbitration and Mediation ("CEPANI"). Our Claim relatesrelated to the accuracy and completeness of information about Omega provided by the Sellers as part of the sale process, the withholding of information by the Sellers during that process and breaches of Sellers’ warranties. We are seekingsought monetary damages from the Sellers. The Sellers served their respective responses to the Claim on February 20, 2017. In its response, Alychlo has asserted a counterclaim for monetary damages contending that we breached a warranty in the SPA and breached the duty of good faith in performing the SPA. There can be no assuranceAlychlo subsequently filed papers seeking permission to introduce an additional counterclaim theory of recovery related to the Irish tax issues disclosed by the Company such that our Claim will be successful,if the position of the Irish tax authorities prevails, Alychlo would have further basis for its counterclaim against Perrigo. In June 2019, the Tribunal denied permission for Alychlo to introduce the additional counterclaim and dismissed certain aspects of the original Alychlo counterclaim.

152

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 19

On August 27, 2021 the Tribunal issued its ruling. The panel found fraud by the Sellers deny liability forof Omega and awarded Perrigo approximately €355.0 million ($417.6 million at the Claim. We deny that Alychlo is entitled to any relief (including monetary relief)time of cash receipt) including fees and costs. The panel also ruled against the Sellers and in favor of Perrigo on all counterclaims. The Sellers have paid all amounts owed under the counterclaim.award, and the arbitral proceedings have now ended. The arbitration proceedings areremain confidential as required by the SPA and the rules of CEPANI. We recorded the CEPANI.cash receipt as a reduction to Operating Expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.


Other Matters
NOTE 17 - COLLABORATION AGREEMENTS AND OTHER CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS
Talcum Powder
We actively collaborate
The Company has been named, together with other pharmaceutical companiesmanufacturers, in product liability lawsuits in state courts in California, Florida, Missouri, New Jersey, Louisiana, Oregon and Illinois alleging that the use of body powder products containing talcum powder causes mesothelioma and lung cancer due to develop, manufacture and market certainthe presence of asbestos. All but one of these cases involve legacy talcum powder products or groups of products. These types of agreements are common in the pharmaceutical industry. We may choose to enter into these types of agreements to, among other things, leverage our or others’ scientific research and development expertise or utilize our extensive marketing and distribution resources. Terms of the various collaboration agreements may require us to make or receive milestone payments upon the achievement of certain product research and development objectives and pay or receive royalties on the future sale, if any, of commercial products resulting from the collaboration. Milestone and up-front payments made are generally recorded in research and development expense if the payments relate to drug candidates that have not yet receivedbeen manufactured by the Company since 1999. One of the pending actions involves a current prescription product that contains talc as an excipient. As of December 31, 2021, the Company is currently named in 54 individual lawsuits seeking compensatory and punitive damages and has accepted a tender for a portion of the defense costs and liability from a retailer for 1 additional matter. The Company has several defenses and intends to aggressively defend these lawsuits. Trials for these lawsuits are currently scheduled throughout 2022, 2023 and 2024, with the earliest trial date in March 2022.

Ranitidine

After regulatory approval. Milestonebodies announced worldwide that ranitidine may potentially contain N-nitrosodimethylamine ("NDMA"), a known environmental contaminant, the Company promptly began testing its externally-sourced ranitidine API and up-front paymentsranitidine-based products. On October 8, 2019, the Company halted shipments of the product based upon preliminary results and on October 23, 2019, the Company made the decision to conduct a voluntary retail market withdrawal.

In February 2020, the resulting actions involving Zantac® and other ranitidine products were transferred for coordinated pretrial proceedings to a Multi-District Litigation (In re Zantac®/Ranitidine Products Liability Litigation MDL No. 2924) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. After the Company successfully moved to dismiss the first set of Master Complaints in the MDL, it now includes 3: 1) an Amended Master Personal Injury Complaint; 2) a Consolidated Amended Consumer Economic Loss Class Action Complaint; and 3) a Consolidated Medical Monitoring Class Action Complaint. All 3 name the Company. Plaintiffs appealed 1 of the original Master Complaints, the Third-Party Payor Complaint, and 2 individual plaintiffs appealed their individual personal injury claims on limited grounds. The Company is not named in the appeals.

On June 30, 2021, the Court dismissed all claims against the retail and distributor defendants with prejudice, thereby reducing the Company’s potential for exposure and liability related to approved drugspossible indemnification. On July 8, 2021, the Court dismissed all claims against the Company with prejudice. Appeals of these dismissal orders to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit have been filed, as well several state level claims related to the theories advanced in the MDL litigation. The Company will generally be capitalizedcontinue to vigorously defend each of these lawsuits.

As of December 31, 2021, the Company has been named in three hundred and amortizedfive (305) personal injury lawsuits, most in the MDL tied to costvarious federal courts alleging that plaintiffs developed various types of goods sold overcancers or are placed at higher risk of developing cancer as a result of ingesting products containing ranitidine. The Company has also been named in a handful of similar lawsuits in the economic lifestate courts of Illinois and Pennsylvania.The Company is named in these lawsuits with manufacturers of the product. Royalties received are generally reflectednational brand Zantac® and other manufacturers of ranitidine products, as revenues,well as distributors, repackagers, and/or retailers. Plaintiffs seek compensatory and royalties paid are generally reflected as costpunitive damages, and in some instances seek applicable remedies under state consumer protection laws.

The Company has also been named in a Complaint brought by the New Mexico Attorney General based on the following theories: violation of goods sold. We enter into a numberNew Mexico public nuisance statute, NMSA 30-8-1 to -14; common law nuisance; and negligence and gross negligence. The Company is named in this lawsuit with manufacturers of collaboration agreementsthe national brand Zantac® and other manufacturers of ranitidine products and/or retailers. Brand name manufactures named in the ordinary courselawsuit also face claims under the state’s Unfair Practices & False Advertising acts. Likewise, the Company has also been named in a Complaint brought by the Mayor and City Council of business. Although we do not consider these arrangements to be material, the following is a brief description of notable agreements entered into during the years ended December 31, 2016and June 27, 2015. We did not enter into any collaborative arrangements during the the six months ended December 31, 2015.

Year Ended December 31, 2017

In December 2017, we entered into a collaboration agreementBaltimore, along with a generic pharmaceutical development company, pursuant to which the parties will collaborate in the ongoing development and commercialization of a generic injectable product. We will provide assistance including preparing and filing the product ANDA, and be responsible for commercializing the product. As partmanufacturers of the agreement, we paid a $2.5 million milestone payment on the effective datenational brand Zantac® and other manufacturers of the agreement. The $2.5 million fee is reported in Research and development on the consolidated financial statements. We will make additional payments if regulatory approval is obtained and certain other development milestones are achieved. These contingent milestone payments could total $14.5 million in aggregate. There can be no assurance that any suchranitidine products will be approved by the FDA on the anticipated schedule and/or at all.retailers. This
153

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 1719




Year Ended December 31, 2016

Duringaction brings claims under the year ended December 31, 2016, we added three additional productsMaryland Consumer Protection Act against the brand name defendants only, as well as public nuisance and negligence for the remaining defendants. The Company was originally able to consolidate the New Mexico and Baltimore Actions to the May 15, 2015 development agreement discussed below thatMDL, however both actions were recently remanded to state court. The Company filed motions to dismiss in both actions. The New Mexico District Court denied the Company’s Motion to Dismiss and litigation continues. The Maryland Circuit Court has not issued a ruling on the Company’s Motion. The Company will continue to vigorously defend each of these lawsuits.

Some of the Company’s retailer customers are subject to similar buy-back terms if the products are approved by the FDA. We did not receive any considerationseeking indemnity from the clinical stage development company, nor do we expectCompany for a portion of their defense costs and liability relating to incur any expense relatedthese cases.
Acetaminophen

The Company has received requests for indemnification and defense of several consumer fraud claims involving its store brand infants’ and children’s acetaminophen products. In September 2020, the Company was directly named as a defendant in 1 suit filed in the Central District of California. The Company was recently named in a cross complaint by a retailer for contractual indemnity in California Superior Court, Alameda County. The Company has also received 16 different claims for indemnification or defense from 10 different retailers for lawsuits filed in California, Illinois, Florida, Minnesota and Pennsylvania, with nationwide class action allegations.

The Plaintiffs generally allege that the children’s and infants’ acetaminophen products have identical drug concentration amounts, yet the infants’ product costs more than the children’s product and consumers have been misled into purchasing the more expensive product. At this juncture, most of these lawsuits have been dismissed or settled for nominal amounts, including suits in which it was directly named. The Company willcontinue to assess whether, or to what extent, the Company may contribute in the lawsuits filed against its retail customers.

Guarantee Liability Related to the development of the additional products. The estimated purchase price for these additional products, based on the initial development budget, is approximately $126.0 million. If development costs exceed the initial budgeted amounts, the purchase price will increase, but will not exceed approximately $174.0 million. If the products are approved by the FDA and we purchase the products, we estimate that one of the acquisitions will occur in 2019 and two of the acquisitions will occur in 2021. There can be no assurance that any such products will be approved by the FDA on the anticipated schedule or at all.Israel API Sale


Year Ended June 27, 2015

On May 15, 2015, we entered into a development agreement wherein we transferred the ownership rights to two pharmaceutical products to a clinical stage development company to fund and conduct development activities for the products. We do not expect to incur any expense related to the development of either product. If the products are approved by the FDA, we will execute a buy-back agreement to purchase each product for a multiple of the development costs incurred. Based on the initial development budget for each product, the estimated purchase price for both products is approximately $78.0 million. If development costs exceed the initial budgeted amounts, the purchase price will increase but will not exceed approximately $105.0 million. If the products are approved by the FDA and we purchase the products, we estimate the acquisitions will occur in 2019.

On May 1, 2015, we entered into an agreement with a clinical stage biotechnology company for the development of two specialty pharmaceutical products. We paid $18.0 million for an option to acquire the two products, which we reported in research and development expense. On March 1, 2016, we exercised the purchase option to acquire both products. We will make additional payments if we obtain regulatory approval and achieve certain sales milestones, and these contingent milestone payments could total $30.0 million in aggregate. We will also be obligated to make certain royalty payments over periods ranging from seven to ten years from the launch of each product (refer to the Development-Stage Rx Products acquisition inNote 2for additional information regarding the acquisition). In addition, on December 20, 2017, we divested one of the development-stage Rx products (refer to Note 2 for additional information on the divestment.

Additional future milestone payments and receipts related to agreements not specifically discussed above are not material.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 18


NOTE 18 - RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

We periodically take action to reduce redundant expenses and improve operating efficiencies, typically in connection with business acquisitions. The following reflects our restructuring activity (in millions):
Balance at June 28, 2014$16.4
Additional charges5.1
Payments(18.5)
Non-cash adjustments(1.4)
Balance at June 27, 20151.6
Additional charges26.9
Payments(6.4)
Non-cash adjustments(1.4)
Balance at December 31, 201520.7
Additional charges31.0
Payments(35.8)
Non-cash adjustments3.8
Balance at December 31, 201619.7
Additional charges61.0
Payments(59.6)
Non-cash adjustments0.3
Balance at December 31, 2017$21.4

Restructuring activity includes severance, lease exit costs, and asset impairments. The charges incurred during the six months endedDecember 31, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2016 were primarily associated with actions we took to streamline our organization as announced on October 22, 2015. The charges incurred during the year endedDecember 31, 2017 were primarily associated with actions we took to streamline our organization as announced on February 21, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2017, $61.0we completed the sale of our Israel API business to SK Capital, resulting in a guarantee liability of $13.8 million, of restructuring expenses were recorded, $27.4 million of which was recorded in our CHCA segmentclassified as a Level 3 liability within the fair value hierarchy. Per the agreement, we will be reimbursed for tax receivables for tax years prior to closing and $17.1 million in our CHCI segment. There were no other material restructuring programs that impacted any other one reportable segmentwill need to reimburse SK Capital for the year ended December 31, 2017.settlement of any uncertain tax liability positions for tax years prior to closing. In addition, after closing and going forward, the Israel API business will be assessed by and liable to the Israel Tax Authority ("ITA") for any audit findings. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $31.02021, we paid $12.5 million of restructuring expenses were recorded, $20.9to resolve the tax liability indemnity for the tax year ended December 31, 2017 (refer to Note 17) and $0.7 million of which was recorded in our CHCI segment. There were no other material restructuring programs in anyupon the sale of the periods presented. All chargesRX business. There is no remaining guarantee liability at December 31, 2021.

Contingencies Accruals

As a result of the matters discussed in this Note, the Company has established a loss accrual for litigation contingencies where we believe a loss to be probable and for which an amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. However, we cannot determine a reasonable estimate of the maximum possible loss or range of loss for these matters given that they are at various stages of the litigation process and each case is subject to inherent uncertainties of litigation. At December 31, 2021, the loss accrual for litigation contingencies reflected on the balance sheet in Other accrued liabilities was approximately $96.9 million. The Company also recorded an insurance recovery receivable reflected on the balance sheet in Restructuring expense.Prepaid expenses and other current assets of approximately $79.0 million related to these litigation contingencies because it believes such amount is recoverable based on communications with its insurers to date; however, the Company may erode this insurance receivable as it incurs defense costs associated with defending the matters. The remaining $17.6 millionCompany’s management believes these accruals for contingencies are reasonable and sufficient based upon information currently available to management; however, there can be no assurance that final costs related to these contingencies will not exceed current estimates or that all of the final costs related to these contingencies will be covered by insurance. (See "Insurance Coverage Litigation," below.) In addition, we have other litigation matters pending for which we have not recorded any accruals because our potential liability for employee severance benefits willthose matters is not probable or cannot be paid within the next year, while the remaining $3.8 million liability for lease exit costs will be incurred over the remaining termsreasonably estimated based on currently available information. For those matters where we have not recorded an accrual but a loss is reasonably possible, we cannot determine a reasonable estimate of the applicable leases.maximum possible loss or range of loss for these matters given that they are at various stages of the litigation process and each case is subject to the inherent uncertainties of litigation.


154

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 19

Insurance Coverage Litigation

In May 2021 insurers on multiple policies of D&O insurance filed an action in the High Court in Dublin against the Company and multiple current and former directors and officers of the Company seeking declaratory judgments on certain coverage issues. Those coverage issues include claims that policies for periods beginning in December 2015 and December 2016, respectively, do not have to provide coverage for the securities actions described above pending in the District of New Jersey or in Massachusetts state court concerning the events of 2015-2017. The policy for the period beginning December 2014 is currently providing coverage for those matters, and the litigation would not affect that existing coverage. However, if the plaintiffs are successful, the total amount of insurance coverage available to defend such lawsuits and to satisfy any judgment or settlement costs thereunder would be limited to 1 policy period. The insurers’ lawsuit also challenges coverage for Krueger derivatively on behalf of nominal defendant Perrigo Company plc v. Alford et al., a prior derivative action filed in the District of New Jersey that was dismissed in August 2020, and for the counterclaims brought in the Omega arbitration proceedings. Perrigo responded on November 1, 2021; Perrigo’s response includes its position that the policies for the periods beginning December 2015 and December 2016 provide coverage for the underlying litigation matters and seeks a ruling to that effect. Discovery activity commenced in February 2022. We intend to defend the lawsuit vigorously.

NOTE 1920 - RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

We periodically take action to reduce redundant expenses and improve operating efficiencies. Restructuring activity includes severance, lease exit costs, and related consulting fees. The following reflects our restructuring activity (in millions):
Balance at December 31, 2018$23.7 
Additional charges25.0 
Payments(28.9)
Non-cash adjustments(0.3)
Balance at December 31, 201919.5 
Additional charges3.2 
Payments(14.2)
Non-cash adjustments0.6 
Balance at December 31, 20209.1 
Additional charges16.9 
Payments(19.0)
Non-cash adjustments(0.1)
Balance at December 31, 2021$6.9 

The charges incurred during the year ended December 31, 2021, were primarily associated with actions taken to streamline the organization. The charges incurred during the year ended December 31, 2020, were also primarily associated with actions taken to streamline the organization. The charges incurred during the year ended December 31, 2019 were primarily associated with our strategic transformation initiative and the reorganization of our executive management team.

Of the amount recorded during the year ended December 31, 2021, $6.1 million was related to our CSCI segment, due primarily to various integration initiatives and $7.9 million was related to our CSCA segment, due primarily to actions taken to streamline the organization. Of the amount recorded during the year ended December 31, 2020, $1.4 million was related to our CSCI segment, also due primarily to various integration initiatives, and $1.0 million was not allocated to a segment and was associated with actions taken to streamline the organization. Of the amount recorded during the year ended December 31, 2019, $12.2 million related to our CSCI segment due primarily to the sales force reorganization in France, and $10.1 million was not allocated to a segment and was primarily related to our strategic transformation initiative and the reorganization of our executive management team. There were no other material restructuring programs in any of the periods presented.

All charges are recorded in Restructuring expense on the Consolidated Financial Statements. The remaining $6.9 million liability for employee severance benefits is expected to be paid within the next year.

155

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 22


NOTE 21 - SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
    
Our segment reporting structure is consistent with the way our chief operating decision makermanagement makes operating decisions, allocates resources and manages the growth and profitability of the business. Operating segments with similar economic characteristics, including long-term profitability, nature of the products sold and production processes, distribution methods, and classes of customers, are aggregated as reportable segmentsbusiness (refer to Note 1).

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 19


We generated third-party revenue in the following geographic locations(1) during each of the periods presented below (in millions):
 Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
Ireland$30.4
 $89.1
 $11.4
 $7.2
U.S.3,272.3
 3,353.0
 1,686.2
 3,303.2
Europe1,313.2
 1,493.0
 758.2
 576.4
All other countries(2)
330.3
 345.5
 176.4
 340.3
 $4,946.2
 $5,280.6
 $2,632.2
 $4,227.1

(1)The net sales by geography is derived from the location of the entity that sells to a third party.
(2)Includes revenue generated primarily in Israel, Mexico, Australia, and Canada.

The net book value of Property, plant and equipment, net by location was as follows (in millions):
 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Ireland$4.6
 $2.7
 $1.3
U.S.538.3
 556.6
 555.0
Europe155.6
 144.6
 157.2
Israel81.5
 114.3
 115.7
All other countries53.1
 51.9
 57.0
 $833.1
 $870.1
 $886.2

Sales to Walmart as a percentage of Consolidated Net sales (reported primarily in our CHCA segment) were as follows:
Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
13.0% 13.0% 13.0% 16.0%


Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 19


Below is a summary of our results by reporting segment (in millions):
CSCACSCIHeld for SaleUnallocatedTotal
Year Ended December 31, 2021
Net sales$2,693.1 $1,445.6 $— $— $4,138.7 
Operating income$206.5 $36.1 $— $167.8 $410.4 
Operating income %7.7 %2.5 %— %— %9.9 %
Total assets$5,983.8 $4,425.8 $16.1 $— $10,425.7 
Capital expenditures$112.0 $24.0 $— $— $136.0 
Property, plant and equipment, net$706.9 $157.2 $— $— $864.1 
Depreciation/amortization$117.0 $179.8 $— $— $296.8 
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Net sales$2,693.0 $1,395.2 $— $— $4,088.2 
Operating income (loss)$465.0 $32.3 $— $(232.1)$265.2 
Operating income %17.3 %2.3 %— %— %6.5 %
Total assets$4,585.1 $4,872.4 $2,030.9 $— $11,488.4 
Capital expenditures$131.4 $28.8 $— $— $160.2 
Property, plant and equipment, net$701.1 $163.5 $— $— $864.6 
Depreciation/amortization$109.9 $177.8 $— $— $287.7 
Change in financial assets$— $— $— $95.3 $95.3 
Year Ended December 31, 2019
Net sales$2,487.7 $1,382.2 $— $— $3,869.9 
Operating income (loss)$406.7 $19.6 $— $(251.6)$174.7 
Operating income %16.3 %1.4 %— %— %4.5 %
Total assets$4,087.7 $4,682.7 $2,531.0 $— $11,301.4 
Capital expenditures$102.6 $18.8 $— $— $121.4 
Property, plant and equipment, net$624.3 $149.9 $— $— $774.2 
Depreciation/amortization$102.8 $194.3 $— $— $297.1 
Change in financial assets$— $— $— $(22.1)$(22.1)
 CHCA 
CHCI(1)
 RX Specialty Sciences Other Unallocated Total
Year Ended December 31, 2017            
Net sales$2,429.9
 $1,491.0
 $969.7
 $
 $55.6
 $
 $4,946.2
Operating income (loss)$445.0
 $12.5
 $307.6
 $
 $8.7
 $(175.6) $598.2
Operating income (loss) %18.3% 0.8 % 31.7% % 15.6 % % 12.1 %
Total assets$3,786.8
 $5,029.0
 $2,813.0
 $
 $
 $
 $11,628.8
Capital expenditures$39.5
 $27.5
 $21.6
 $
 $
 $
 $88.6
Property, plant and equipment, net$512.7
 $180.9
 $139.5
 $
 $
 $
 $833.1
Depreciation/amortization$115.2
 $223.7
 $100.1
 $
 $5.8
 $
 $444.8
Change in financial assets$
 $
 $
 $24.9
 $
 $
 $24.9
              
Year Ended December 31, 2016            
Net sales$2,507.1
 $1,652.2
 $1,042.8
 $
 $78.5
 $
 $5,280.6
Operating income (loss)$399.8
 $(2,087.4) $(0.2) $(201.2) $6.1
 $(116.8) $(1,999.7)
Operating income (loss) %15.9% (126.3)% % % 7.8 % % (37.9)%
Total assets$3,351.3
 $4,795.2
 $2,646.4
 $2,775.8
 $301.4
 $
 $13,870.1
Capital expenditures$59.1
 $23.7
 $20.4
 $
 $3.0
 $
 $106.2
Property, plant and equip, net$528.3
 $167.2
 $129.7
 $0.4
 $44.5
 $
 $870.1
Depreciation/amortization$119.1
 $210.0
 $120.1
 $
 $7.8
 $
 $457.0
Change in financial assets$
 $
 $
 $2,608.2
 $
 $
 $2,608.2
              
Six Months Ended December 31, 2015            
Net sales$1,251.5
 $833.0
 $502.6
 $
 $45.1
 $
 $2,632.2
Operating income (loss)$209.2
 $(148.5) $181.9
 $(6.5) $(19.5) $(149.0) $67.6
Operating income (loss) %16.7% (17.8)% 36.2% % (43.3)% % 2.6 %
Total assets$3,384.8
 $7,083.5
 $2,738.0
 $5,930.2
 $213.1
 $
 $19,349.6
Capital expenditures$38.0
 $26.3
 $12.1
 $
 $1.4
 $
 $77.8
Property, plant and equip, net$540.9
 $179.5
 $118.5
 $
 $47.3

$
 $886.2
Depreciation/amortization$60.9
 $81.9
 $34.3
 $
 $5.3
 $
 $182.4
Change in financial assets$
 $
 $
 $(57.3) $
 $
 $(57.3)
              
Year Ended June 27, 2015            
Net sales$2,478.8
 $704.6
 $936.0
 $
 $107.7
 $
 $4,227.1
Operating income (loss)$381.9
 $38.2
 $364.7
 $(17.6) $26.8
 $(121.5) $672.5
Operating income %15.4% 5.4 % 39.0% % 24.9 % % 15.9 %
Total assets$3,763.8
 $7,163.0
 $2,373.4
 $6,040.7
 $251.0
 $
 $19,591.9
Capital expenditures$76.8
 $13.1
 $41.0
 $0.5
 $5.6
 $
 $137.0
Property, plant and equip, net$556.8
 $176.8
 $113.0
 $
 $85.8
 $
 $932.4
Depreciation/amortization$108.4
 $72.5
 $65.7
 $1.5
 $10.6
 $
 $258.7
Change in financial assets$
 $
 $
 $(78.5) $
 $
 $(78.5)


(1)     CHCI includes Omega activity subsequent to March 30, 2015.



Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 19


The following is a summarynet book value of our revenueProperty, plant and equipment, net by categorylocation was as follows (in millions):
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
U.S.$674.9 $636.3 
Europe(1)
174.4 169.7 
All other countries14.8 58.6 
$864.1 $864.6 
 Year Ended Six Months Ended Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 31,
2015
 June 27,
2015
CHCA       
Cough/Cold/Allergy/Sinus(1)
$483.7
 $454.6
 $234.6
 $455.6
Analgesics(1)
349.8
 343.5
 173.1
 375.7
Gastrointestinal(1)
340.0
 335.4
 195.8
 384.0
Infant nutritionals413.9
 427.0
 200.2
 383.8
Smoking cessation297.2
 308.5
 147.5
 284.5
Vitamins, minerals and dietary supplements(1)
45.4
 160.4
 105.8
 183.5
Animal health141.3
 143.7
 62.3
 157.0
Other CHCA(1),(2)
358.6
 334.0
 132.2
 254.7
Total CHCA2,429.9
 2,507.1
 1,251.5
 2,478.8
CHCI       
Branded OTC1,174.0
 1,349.2
 665.9
 368.4
Other CHCI(3)
317.0
 303.0
 167.1
 336.2
Total CHCI1,491.0
 1,652.2
 833.0
 704.6
Generic prescription drugs969.7
 1,042.8
 502.6
 936.0
Active pharmaceutical ingredients55.6
 78.5
 45.1
 107.7
Total revenue$4,946.2
 $5,280.6
 $2,632.2
 $4,227.1


(1)Includes Ireland Property, plant and equipment, net sales from our OTC contract manufacturing business.
(2)
Consists primarily of feminine hygiene, diabetes care, dermatological care, branded OTC, diagnostic products and other miscellaneous or otherwise uncategorized product lines and markets, none of which is greater than 10% of the CHCA segment.
(3)
Consists primarily of liquids licensed products, cough/cold/allergy, analgesics, diagnostic products and other miscellaneous or otherwise uncategorized product lines and markets, none of which is greater than 10% of the CHCI segment.

NOTE 20 - QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (unaudited)

The following table presents unaudited quarterly consolidated operating resultsof $0.1 million and $20.3 million, for each of our last ten quarters. The information below has been prepared on a basis consistent with our audited consolidated financial statements (in millions, except per share amounts).
Year Ended December 31, 2017
First
Quarter
(2)
 
Second
Quarter
(3)
 
Third
Quarter
(4)
 
Fourth
Quarter
(5)
Net sales$1,194.0
 $1,237.9
 $1,231.3
 $1,283.0
Gross profit$464.4
 $504.6
 $497.8
 $512.7
Change in financial assets$(17.1) $38.7
 $2.6
 $0.7
Net income (loss)$71.6
 $(69.6) $44.5
 $73.1
Earnings (loss) per share(1):
       
Basic$0.50
 $(0.49) $0.31
 $0.52
Diluted$0.50
 $(0.49) $0.31
 $0.52
Weighted average shares outstanding       
Basic143.4
 143.3
 141.3
 140.8
Diluted143.6
 143.3
 141.7
 141.2

(1)    The sum of individual per share amounts may not equal due to rounding.
(2)
Includes IPR&D impairment charges of $12.2 million, gain on certain divestiture of $21.8 million, and restructuring charges of $38.7 million.
(3)
Includes intangible asset impairment charges of $18.5 million, changes in financial assets of $38.7 million, and loss on early debt extinguishment of $135.2 million.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 20



(4)
Includes held-for-sale impairment charges of $3.3 million, and fixed asset impairment charges of $4.0 million.
(5)
Includes unusual litigation charge reversal of $0.2 million.
Year Ended December 31, 2016
First
Quarter
(2)
 
Second
Quarter
(3)
 
Third
Quarter
(4)
 
Fourth
Quarter
(5)
Net sales$1,347.3
 $1,340.5
 $1,261.6
 $1,331.2
Gross profit$533.1
 $546.5
 $484.5
 $487.7
Change in financial assets$204.4
 $910.8
 $377.4
 $1,115.6
Net loss$(529.2) $(534.3) $(1,590.2) $(1,359.1)
Loss per share(1):
       
Basic$(3.70) $(3.73) $(11.10) $(9.48)
Diluted$(3.70) $(3.73) $(11.10) $(9.48)
Weighted average shares outstanding       
Basic143.2
 143.2
 143.3
 143.4
Diluted143.2
 143.2
 143.3
 143.4

(1)    The sum of individual per share amounts may not equal due to rounding.
(2)
Includes an intangible asset impairment charges of $273.3 million, and a goodwill impairment charge of $130.5 million.
(3)
Includes held-for-sale impairment charges of $10.5 million and change in financial assets of $910.8 million.
(4)
Includes intangible asset impairment charges of $866.6 million, goodwill impairment charge of $737.9 thousand, and held-for-sale impairment charges of $10.2 million.
(5)
Includes intangible asset impairment charges of $378.6 million, goodwill impairment charge of $224.1 million, and a reduction in held-for-sale impairment charges of $4.5 million.

Six Months Ended December 31, 2015
September 26, 2015 (2)
 
December 31, 2015 (3)
Net sales$1,273.1
 $1,359.1
Gross profit$535.2
 $543.7
Change in financial assets$(173.8) $116.6
Net income (loss)$260.9
 $(218.4)
Earnings (loss) per share(1):
   
Basic$1.78
 $(1.51)
Diluted$1.78
 $(1.51)
Weighted average shares outstanding   
Basic146.3
 144.9
Diluted146.9
 144.9

(1)
The sum of individual per share amounts may not equal due to rounding.
(2)
Includes Mylan defense-related fees of $15.6 million.
(3)
Includes an intangible asset impairment charge of $185.1 million, Mylan defense-related fees of $71.3 million, an impairment charge on our India API held for sale assets of $29.0 million, restructuring charges of $24.7 million, and an investment impairment charge of $10.7 million.


Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
Note 21


NOTE 21 - TRANSITION PERIOD COMPARATIVE DATA

The following table presents certain financial information (in millions, except per share amounts):
 Six Months Ended
 December 31,
2015
 December 27,
2014
   (Unaudited)
Net sales$2,632.2
 $1,844.7
Cost of sales1,553.3
 1,170.9
Gross profit1,078.9
 673.8
    
Operating expenses   
Distribution47.9
 29.2
Research and development88.2
 89.8
Selling325.9
 95.3
Administration306.8
 165.6
Impairment charges215.6
 
Restructuring26.9
 4.2
Total operating expenses1,011.3
 384.1
    
Operating income67.6
 289.7
    
Change in financial assets(57.3) (46.9)
Interest expense, net89.9
 56.7
Other expense (Income), net25.2
 60.3
Loss on extinguishment of debt0.9
 9.6
Income before income taxes8.9
 210.0
Income tax expense (benefit)(33.6) 29.4
Net income$42.5
 $180.6
    
Income per share   
Basic$0.29
 $1.34
Diluted$0.29
 $1.34
    
Weighted-average shares outstanding   
Basic145.6
 135.1
Diluted146.1
 135.6
    
Dividends declared per share$0.25
 $0.21

ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.
ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a)Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)
Perrigo Company plc - Item 9A



or 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2017. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2017 because of the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting described in the "Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting." Notwithstanding this material weakness, management concluded that the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2017 in conformity with GAAP and our external auditors have issued an unqualified opinion on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.

(b)Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of Perrigo Company plc is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

All systems of internal control, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems deemed to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of inherent limitations, our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. The framework used in carrying out our evaluation was the 2013 Internal Control - Integrated Framework published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations ("COSO") of the Treadway Commission. In evaluating our information technology controls, we also used components of the framework contained in the Control Objectives for Information and related Technology ("COBIT"), which was developed by the Information Systems Audit and Control Association’s IT Governance Institute, as a complement to the COSO internal control framework.

Management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was ineffective as of December 31, 2017. The results of management’s assessment have been reviewed with our Audit Committee.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8



Income Taxes

The material weaknesses over the income tax process that was identified during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 was not remediated during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, and we determined that we did not design or maintain effective controls over our income tax accounting process. Accordingly, there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

The results of management’s assessment have been reviewed with our Audit Committee. Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, also audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as stated in their report that is included herein.

REMEDIATION PLAN

We are committed to remediating the control deficiencies that gave rise to the material weakness described above. Management is responsible for implementing changes and improvements to internal control over financial reporting and for remediating the control deficiencies that gave rise to the material weakness.

With oversight from the Audit Committee, we have taken significant steps to remediate our internal control deficiencies in income taxes by redesigning our controls, many of which operated for the first time at December 31, 2017. Our efforts have consisted primarily of strengthening our tax organization and designing a suite of controls related to the components of our income tax process, including valuation allowances, uncertain tax positions and non-routine events and transactions, to enhance our management review controls over income taxes. Because many of our controls operated for the first time at December 31, 2017, we have not had a sufficient period of time to demonstrate operating effectiveness in 2017.

Some of the key remediation actions taken include:

Reviewing our income tax processes and controls and enhancing the overall design and procedures performed in calculating our income tax provision on an interim and annual basis
Significantly strengthening our tax capabilities through a combination of key new hires and providing additional resources
Re-designing our management review controls and enhancing the precision of review around the key income tax areas

To complete the remediation, we plan, with oversight from the Audit Committee, to continue to:

Evaluate the sufficiency of our income tax resources and personnel to determine whether additional enhancements are needed
Evaluate whether further enhancements are needed to the design of our income tax procedures and controls
Demonstrate consistent operating effectiveness of our management review controls over income taxes over a number of quarterly periods

We expect to implement the remaining remediation actions in 2018. Until the remediation actions are fully implemented and the operational effectiveness of related internal controls is validated through testing, the material weakness described above will continue to exist.

We are committed to achieving and maintaining a strong internal control environment and believe the remediation measures will strengthen our internal control over financial reporting and remediate the material weakness identified.

(c)    Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Other than as described above under "Remediation Plan for Material Weakness," there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended December 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8






ITEM 9B.
OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 8



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON INTERNAL
CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Perrigo Company plc

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Perrigo Company plc’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described below on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, Perrigo Company plc (the Company) has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified and included in management’s assessment. Management has identified a material weakness in controls related to the company’s income tax accounting process.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 20172021 and 2016, the period from June 28, 2015 to December 31, 2015, and the fiscal year ended June 27, 2015, and the related notes and the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred2020, respectively.

Sales to Walmart as the “consolidated financial statements”). This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing and extenta percentage of audit tests appliedConsolidated Net sales (reported primarily in our audit of the 2017 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 1, 2018, which expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.CSCA segment) were as follows:

Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31, 2020December 31,
2019
14.0%15.2%15.5%
Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
Perrigo Company plc - Item 8
156





with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 1, 2018


Perrigo Company plc - Item 10



ITEM 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
PART III.

ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
(a)Directors of Perrigo Company plc.

This information is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in May, 2018 under the heading "Election of Directors" or will be included in an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K.    Not applicable.
 
(b)Executive Officers of Perrigo Company plc.

See Part I, Additional Item of this Form 10-K under the heading "Executive Officers of the Registrant."
(c)Audit Committee Financial Expert.

This information is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in May, 2018 under the heading "Audit Committee" or will be included in an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K.
(d)Identification and Composition of the Audit Committee.

This information is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in May, 2018 under the heading "Audit Committee" or will be included in an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K.
(e)Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

This information is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in May, 2018 under the heading "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" or will be included in an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K.
(f)Code of Ethics.

This information is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in May, 2018 under the heading "Corporate Governance" or will be included in an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

This information is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in May, 2018 under the headings "Executive Compensation", "Renumeration Committee Report", "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control" and "Director Compensation" or will be included in an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

This information is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in May, 2018 under the heading "Ownership of Perrigo Ordinary Shares" or will be included in an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K. Information concerning equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in May, 2018 under the heading "Equity Compensation Plan Information" or will be included in an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 13



ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

This information is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in May, 2018 under the heading "Certain Relationships and Related-Party Transactions" and "Corporate Governance" or will be included in an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

This information is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in May, 2018 under the heading "Ratification, in a Non-Binding Advisory Vote, of the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Auditor of the Company and Authorization, in a Binding Vote, of the Board of Directors, Acting Through the Audit Committee, to Fix the Renumeration of the Auditor" or will be included in an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K.

Perrigo Company plc - Item 15
Exhibits


PART IV.
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
(a)The following documents are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Form 10-K:

1.All financial statements. See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2.Financial Schedules.
Schedule II – Valuation(a)Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Qualifying Accounts.Procedures


Schedules other thanOur management, with the one listed are omitted becauseparticipation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the required information iseffectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2021. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2021. Management concluded that the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report present fairly, in all material respects, the footnotes, immaterial or not applicable.financial position of the Company at December 31, 2021 in conformity with GAAP and our external auditors have issued an unqualified opinion on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021.


3.Exhibits:
(b)Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
2.1
2.2
2.3+
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
3.1
3.2
4.1
Perrigo Company plc - Item 15
Exhibits


4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4

Perrigo Company plc - Item 15
Exhibits


10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13

10.14*
10.15*
10.16*
10.17*
10.18*
10.19*
Perrigo Company plc - Item 15
Exhibits


10.20*
10.21*
10.22*
10.23*
10.24*
10.25*
10.26*
10.27*
10.28*
10.29*
10.30*
10.31*
10.32*
10.33*
10.34*
10.35*
10.36*
10.37*
Perrigo Company plc - Item 15
Exhibits


10.38*
10.39*
10.40*
10.41*
10.42*
10.43*
10.44*
10.45*
10.46*
10.47*
10.48*
10.49*
10.50*
10.51*
10.52*
10.53*
10.54*
10.55*
Perrigo Company plc - Item 15
Exhibits


10.56*
10.57*
10.58*
10.59*
10.60*
10.61*
10.62*
10.63*
10.64*
10.65*
10.66*
10.67*
10.68*
10.69*
21
23
24
31
32
101.INSXBRL Instance Document.
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
Perrigo Company plc - Item 15
Exhibits


101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

+Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this agreement. A completed copy of the agreement, including the redacted portions, has been filed separately with the SEC.
*Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
(b)Exhibits.
The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this Report. See Item 15(a)(3) above.
(c)Financial Statement Schedules.
The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this Report. See Item 15(a)(2) above.

Perrigo Company plc

SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
PERRIGO COMPANY PLC
(in millions)

  Year Ended Six Months Ended
Allowance for doubtful accounts December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Balance at beginning of period $6.3
 $4.5
 $2.6
Net bad debt expenses(1)
 1.4
 2.1
 2.5
Additions/(deductions)(2)
 (1.5) (0.3) (0.6)
Balance at end of period $6.2
 $6.3
 $4.5
(1)
Includes effects of changes in foreign exchange rates.
(2)
Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries. Also includes effects of changes in foreign exchange rates.



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the Registrantsupervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

All systems of internal control, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems deemed to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of inherent limitations, our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021. The framework used in carrying out our evaluation was the 2013 Internal Control - Integrated Framework published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations ("COSO") of the Treadway Commission. In evaluating our information technology controls, we also used components of the framework contained in the Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology, which was developed by the Information Systems Audit and Control Association’s IT Governance Institute, as a complement to the COSO internal control framework. Management has duly causedconcluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2021. The results of management’s assessment have been reviewed with our Audit Committee.

Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, foralso audited the year ended effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as stated in their report that is included herein.
157




ITEM 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

ITEM 9C.    DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS.

Not applicable.
158




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Perrigo Company plc

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Perrigo Company plc’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 to be signed2021, based on its behalfcriteria established in Internal Control–Integrated Framework issued by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorizedCommittee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Perrigo Company plc (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the City of Dublin, Ireland onperiod ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes and the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”) and our report dated March 1, 2018.2022 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion
PERRIGO COMPANY PLC
By:/s/ Uwe F. Roehrhoff
Uwe F. Roehrhoff
Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)


POWER OF ATTORNEY
Each person whose signature appears below hereby appoints Uwe F. Roehrhoff, Ronald L. WinowieckiThe Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and Todd W. Kingma and eachfor its assessment of them severally, acting alone and without the other, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact with authority to executeeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the name of each such person, and to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, together with any exhibits thereto and other documents therewith, any and all amendments to thisaccompanying Management’s Annual Report on Form 10-K forInternal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the year ended December 31, 2017 necessary or advisable to enable Perrigo Company plc to complyCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or anyPCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules regulations and requirementsregulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in respect thereof, which amendments may makeaccordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 1, 2022


159

Perrigo Company plc - Item 10

PART III.

ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
(a)Directors of Perrigo Company plc.

This information is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 6, 2022 under the heading "Election of Directors" or will be included in an amendment to this annual report ason Form 10-K.
(b)Executive Officers of Perrigo Company plc.

See Part I, Additional Item of this Form 10-K under the aforesaid attorney-in-fact executingheading "Information About our Executive Officers."
(c)Audit Committee Financial Expert.

This information is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the same deems appropriate.Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 6, 2022 under the heading "Audit Committee" or will be included in an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K.

Pursuant to the requirements(d)Identification and Composition of the Securities Exchange ActAudit Committee.

This information is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of 1934,Shareholders to be held on May 6, 2022 under the heading "Audit Committee" or will be included in an amendment to this Annual Reportannual report on Form 10-K10-K.
(e)Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

This information is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the year ended December 31, 2017 has been signed belowAnnual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 6, 2022 under the heading "Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports" or will be included in an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K.
(f)Code of Ethics.

This information is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the following personsAnnual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on behalfMay 6, 2022 under the heading "Corporate Governance" or will be included in an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

This information is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 6, 2022 under the headings "Executive Compensation", "Remuneration Committee Report", "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control" and "Director Compensation" or will be included in an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

This information is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 6, 2022 under the heading "Ownership of Perrigo Ordinary Shares" or will be included in an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K. Information concerning equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 6, 2022 under the heading "Equity Compensation Plan Information" or will be included in an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K.
160

Perrigo Company plc - Item 13


ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

This information is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 6, 2022 under the heading "Certain Relationships and Related-Party Transactions" and "Corporate Governance" or will be included in an amendment to this annual report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

This information is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 6, 2022 under the heading "Ratification, in a Non-Binding Advisory Vote, of the RegistrantAppointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Auditor of the Company and Authorization, in a Binding Vote, of the capacities indicatedBoard of Directors, Acting Through the Audit Committee, to Fix the Remuneration of the Auditor" or will be included in an amendment to this annual report on March 1, 2018.Form 10-K.






161
SignatureTitle
/s/ Uwe F. Roehrhoff
President and Chief Executive Officer
Uwe F. Roehrhoff(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Ronald L. WinowieckiChief Financial Officer
Ronald L. Winowiecki(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
/s/ Laurie BrlasChairman
Laurie Brlas
/s/ Bradley A. AlfordDirector
Bradley A. Alford
/s/ Rolf A. ClassonDirector
Rolf A. Classon
/s/ Adriana KaraboutisDirector
Adriana Karaboutis
/s/ Gary M. CohenDirector
Gary M. Cohen
/s/ Jeffrey B. KindlerDirector
Jeffrey B. Kindler
/s/ Donal O'ConnorDirector
Donal O'Connor
/s/ Geoffrey M. ParkerDirector
Geoffrey M. Parker
/s/ Theodore R. SamuelsDirector
Theodore R. Samuels
/s/ Jeffrey C. SmithDirector
Jeffrey C. Smith

Perrigo Company plc - Item 15

Exhibits



PART IV.
195
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)The following documents are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Form 10-K:

1.All financial statements. See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2.Financial Schedules.
Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.
Schedules other than the one listed are omitted because the required information is included in the footnotes, immaterial or not applicable.

3.Exhibits:
2.1
2.2
2.3**
2.4
2.5+
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.1
3.2
4.1
162

Perrigo Company plc - Item 15
Exhibits

4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
10.1
10.2
10.3


10.4
10.5
163

Perrigo Company plc - Item 15
Exhibits

10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10*
10.11*
.
10.12*
10.13*
10.14*
10.15*
10.16*
10.17*
10.18*
10.19*
10.20*
10.21*
10.22*
164

Perrigo Company plc - Item 15
Exhibits

10.23*
10.24*
10.25*
10.26*
10.27*
10.28*
10.29*
10.30*
10.31*
10.32*
10.33*
10.34*
10.35*
10.36*
10.37*
10.38*
10.39*
10.40*
165

Perrigo Company plc - Item 15
Exhibits

10.41*
10.42*
10.43*
10.44*
10.45*
10.46*
10.47*
10.48*
10.49*
10.50*
10.51*
10.52*
10.53*
10.54*
10.55*
10.56*
10.57
10.58
166

Perrigo Company plc - Item 15
Exhibits

10.59*
21
23
24
31
32
101.INSInline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
104Cover Page Interactive Data File, formatted in Inline XBRL (contained in Exhibit 101.INS).

+    Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this agreement. A completed copy of the agreement, including the redacted portions, has been filed separately with the SEC.
*Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
**     The Company has omitted schedules and other similar attachments to such agreement pursuant to Item 601(b) of Regulation S-K. The Company will furnish a copy of such omitted document to the SEC upon request.
(b)Exhibits.
The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this Report. See Item 15(a)(3) above.
(c)Financial Statement Schedules.
The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this Report. See Item 15(a)(2) above.

167

Perrigo Company plc - Item 15
Exhibits

SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
PERRIGO COMPANY PLC
(in millions)

Year Ended
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Balance at beginning of period$6.5 $6.0 $5.8 
Net bad debt expenses(1)
4.0 2.3 2.2 
Additions/(deductions)(2)
(3.3)(1.8)(2.0)
Balance at end of period$7.2 $6.5 $6.0 
(1)Includes effects of changes in foreign exchange rates.
(2)Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries. Also includes effects of changes in foreign exchange rates and transfers to held for sale.

168




SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Dublin, Ireland on March 1, 2022.
PERRIGO COMPANY PLC
By:/s/ Murray S. Kessler
Murray S. Kessler
Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY
Each person whose signature appears below hereby appoints Murray S. Kessler, Raymond P. Silcock, and Todd W. Kingma and each of them severally, acting alone and without the other, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact with authority to execute in the name of each such person, and to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, together with any exhibits thereto and other documents therewith, any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 necessary or advisable to enable Perrigo Company plc to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or any rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in respect thereof, which amendments may make such other changes in the report as the aforesaid attorney-in-fact executing the same deems appropriate.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 1, 2022.



169




SignatureTitle
/s/ Murray S. KesslerPresident and Chief Executive Officer and Director
Murray S. Kessler(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Raymond P. SilcockChief Financial Officer
Raymond P. Silcock(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
/s/ Rolf A. ClassonChairman of the Board
Rolf A. Classon
/s/ Bradley A. AlfordDirector
Bradley A. Alford
/s/ Orlando D. AshfordDirector
Orlando D. Ashford
/s/ Katherine DoyleDirector
Katherine Doyle
/s/ Adriana KaraboutisDirector
Adriana Karaboutis
/s/ Jeffrey B. KindlerDirector
Jeffrey B. Kindler
/s/ Erica L. MannDirector
Erica L. Mann
/s/ Donal O'ConnorDirector
Donal O'Connor
/s/ Geoffrey M. ParkerDirector
Geoffrey M. Parker
/s/ Theodore R. SamuelsDirector
Theodore R. Samuels


170