☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of the “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was ~~$238,831.~~$194,065.

As of September 28, ~~2018,~~2019, the registrant’s outstanding common stock consisted of 39,538,007 shares, $0.01 par value.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”), the other reports, statements, and information that we have previously filed or that we may subsequently file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and public announcements that we have previously made or may subsequently make include, may include, incorporate by reference or may incorporate by reference certain statements that may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report and those reports, statements, information and announcements address activities, events or developments that Veritec, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries hereinafter referred to as “we,” “us,” “our”, the "Company" or “Veritec”) expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future. Any statements in this document about expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not historical facts and are forward-looking statements. These statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or phrases such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “predict,” “potential,” “believe,” “will likely result,” “expect,” “will continue,” “anticipate,” “seek,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “projection,” “would” and “outlook,” and similar expressions. Accordingly, these statements involve estimates, assumptions, and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in them. Any forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to the factors discussed throughout this document. All forward-looking statements concerning economic conditions, rates of growth, rates of income or values as may be included in this document are based on information available to us on the dates noted, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.

The Company is currently solely engaged in the development, marketing, sales and licensing of products and rendering of professional services related to its mobile banking prepaid debit card solutions. The Company was also previously engaged in its proprietary two-dimensional matrix symbology technology (also commonly referred to as “two-dimensional barcodes”, “2D barcodes”, or “Barcode Technology”) which ~~it sold~~its old on September 30, ~~2015.~~2015 .

In this Form 10-K, the Company’s mobile software banking technology will hereafter be referred to as its “Mobile Banking Technology”. The Mobile Banking Technology is used to offer Prepaid Card Programs to sponsor banks and approved applicants/cardholders. These programs may also be referred to as the MTC™ card or the Blinx ON-OFF™ Prepaid Card programs.

Veritec, Inc. was incorporated in the State of Nevada on September 8, 1982 for the purpose of development, marketing and sales of a line of microprocessor based encoding and decoding system products that utilize matrix symbology technology, a two-dimensional barcode technology originally invented by the founders of Veritec under United States patents 4,924,078, 5,331,176, 5,612,524 and 7,159,780.

In 1995, an involuntary proceeding under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code was commenced against Veritec. The proceeding was subsequently converted to a Chapter 11 proceeding and a plan of reorganization was confirmed on April 23, 1997. The Chapter 11 plan was successfully completed and the proceeding was closed on October 13, 1999.

In November 2003, Veritec formed a wholly owned subsidiary, Vcode, Inc., to which it assigned its United States patents 4,924,078, 5,331,176 and 5,612,524, together with all corresponding patent applications, foreign patents, foreign patent applications, and all continuations, continuations in part, divisions, extensions, renewals, reissues and re-examinations. Vcode in turn entered into an Exclusive License Agreement with VData LLC (VData), an Illinois limited liability company unrelated to Veritec.

The purpose of the incorporation of Vcode and the Exclusive Licensing Agreement was to allow VData to pursue enforcement and licensing of the patents against parties who wrongfully exploit the technology of such patents. VData is the wholly owned subsidiary of Acacia Research Corporation (NASDAQ: ACTG). The Exclusive License Agreement provided that all expenses related to the enforcement and licensing of the patents will be the responsibility of VData, with the parties sharing in the net proceeds, as specified under the terms of the agreement, arising from enforcement or licensing of the patents. In November 2008, VData and Vcode mutually agreed to terminate the Exclusive License Agreement between the two companies. As a result of the termination of the Exclusive License Agreement and conclusion of all lawsuits and enforcement activities by VData, infringement revenue has ceased.

In February 2005, an adverse ruling was made in the arbitration proceeding against Veritec in favor of Mitsubishi. This ruling compelled Veritec to file a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court (Bankruptcy Court) for the District of Minnesota on February 28, 2005. After reaching an agreement with Mitsubishi and other creditors, in April 2006, Veritec’s Third Amended Plan of Reorganization was confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court. On August 8, 2006, the Bankruptcy Court entered an Order and Final Decree and closed the Chapter 11 case. In connection with the settlement with Mitsubishi, Veritec obtained a license to certain Mitsubishi EDAC technology and Veritec granted Mitsubishi a license to Veritec’s proprietary VeriCode® Barcode Technology software.

Pursuant to an April 27, 2007 agreement between Veritec and RBA International, Inc. (“RBA”), Veritec acquired from RBA the source code, documentation and software to RBA’s Java and IVR software (used for the RBA banking system). In furtherance of such agreement, RBA granted Veritec a perpetual royalty-free non-exclusive worldwide license to use, modify and distribute such software, without restriction, to any existing or future customers. Veritec’s development under this license, as well as Veritec’s independent development of its own mobile banking applications and components, and integration of such items comprises Veritec’s Mobile Banking Technology.

On January 12, 2009, Veritec formed a wholly owned subsidiary, Veritec Financial Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, to bring its Mobile Banking Technology, products and related professional services to market. In May 2009 Veritec was registered by Security First Bank in Visa’s Third Party Registration Program as a Cardholder Independent Sales Organization and Third-Party Servicer. As a Cardholder Independent Sales Organization, Veritec ~~was~~is able to promote and sell ~~Visa branded~~Visa-branded card programs. As a Third-Party Servicer, Veritec ~~provided~~provides back-end cardholder transaction processing services for ~~Visa branded~~Visa-branded card programs on behalf of ~~Security First Bank. As~~its sponsoring bank. Veritec has a portfolio of ~~October 2010 the Company’s registration~~five United States and eight foreign patents. In addition, we have seven U. S. and twenty-eight foreign pending patent applications. Veritec has had agreements with Security First Bank terminated. As of April 2011, the Company signed an ISO and processor agreement with Palm Desert National Bank (which was later assigned to First California Bank) to market and process the Company’s Visa branded card program on behalf of the bank.

The program was implemented at First California Bank (FCB) in June, 2011. The blinx On-Off brand was introduced as part of the implementation, at FCB. Going forward, accounts would be issued as blinx ON-OFF™ branded cards under First California Bank. In 2013 First California Bank was acquired by Pacific Western Bank (PWB) in its entirety. PWB decided to exit the Prepaid Card sponsorship business and notified all of its Prepaid Card Program Managers, including Veritec that their bank sponsorship agreements were terminated and the programs would be closed by the end of 2013. PWB provided Veritec several references tovarious banks that were interested in sponsoring Prepaid Card programs such as Veritec’s blinx ON-OFF™ program including Central Bank of Kansas City (CBKC). Veritec entered into discussions with CBKC about sponsoring the Veritec program and a sponsorship agreement was reached between Veritec and CBKC in October 2013. The Visa and First Data Payment Networks approved the bank sponsorship change in November, 2013. Unexpected regulatory delays to the transfer process caused PWB to extend the program closure date to February 28, 2014. The transfer and transition of the blinx ON-OFF™ Prepaid Card program from PWB to CBKC was completed on February 5, 2014. The Veritec blinx ON-OFF™ Prepaid Card Program became live at CBKC on that date. Late in the ~~fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, the relationship between CBKC and the Company ended. The Company is~~past andis currently seeking a bank to sponsor its Prepaid Card programs.

The Veritec Prepaid Card Program provides full services to the sponsor bank. These services include program management, promotion and marketing, application processing, account activation, compliance management, fraud monitoring, accounts reconciliation and dispute resolution. Veritec provides cardholders with automated and live agent customer service, full disclosures, an online account management portal, monthly statements, convenient deposit options, global access to PIN and Signature transactions, and, ATM withdrawals through the Visa and First Data/Star Networks.

On September 30, 2014, Veritec ("Buyer"), and Tangible Payments LLC ("Seller"), a Maryland Limited Liability Company, entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the "Asset Purchase Agreement") pursuant to which Veritec acquired certain assets and liabilities of the Tangible Payments LLC. Tangible Payments is a combined-solution software package that incorporates features the market is currently purchasing as an individual-solutions product that requires integrated services at an additional cost. With a one-stop package, Tangible’s Payments with its payment gateway solution eliminates costs and reduces deployment time.

On September 30, 2015, the Company sold all of its assets of its Barcode Technology to The Matthews Group, a related party, which was comprised solely of its intellectual property. The sale allows the Company to focus its efforts solely on its Mobile Banking Technology.

The Company believes that its Mobile Banking Technology platform and its blinx On-Off™ debit card and blinxPay™ mobile wallet programs are a significant advance in mobile banking and close loop/open loop debit technology and is capable of bringing significant value to card issuing and sponsoring organizations, whether they be commercial or government.

In fiscal year 2009, the Company announced the release of its Mobile Toggle Card (MTC™) Program on the Company’s mobile banking software platform under a sponsoring bank. Veritec’s mobile banking software platform is a debit based, pre-paid and gift card solution that is licensed by Veritec’s wholly owned subsidiary, Veritec Financial Systems, Inc., to debit card issuers and sponsoring organizations. Under the MTC™ Program, card issuers and sponsors may provide the MTC™ branded debit or gift cards to individuals with and without demand deposit accounts (e.g., the latter the “under-banked”). The MTC™ card may be part of a Visa® branded program and, as such, the cards are accepted anywhere in the world that Visa cards are accepted.

With an MTC™ card, the cardholders are empowered to combat unpermitted and fraudulent use of their debit cards by “toggling” their cards “on” and “off” with their mobile phones. Cardholders no longer have to completely rely on their card issuers to monitor possible fraudulent activity on their accounts. Cardholders can now de-activate their cards themselves, in ~~real time,~~real-time, any time they choose to do so. In addition to this toggling feature, cardholders may apply for their cards online, arrange for direct deposits to be made to their cards, and transfer money to their card from another account. Cardholders may also elect to receive various alerts on their mobile phones about activity on their card. In the fiscal year 2010, the Company began accepting applications for the MTC™ card from individual applicants and issuing live Visa® branded debit cards under the MTC Mobile Toggle Card Program.

In fiscal year 2011, Veritec began marketing the blinx ON-OFF™ branded card under a bank sponsorship. The blinx ON-OFF™ card is based on the Mobile Banking Technology platform and offers the same features and functions as the MTC™ branded card but with different pricing for ~~bank sponsored~~bank-sponsored cards.

In addition to the MTC™ and blinx ON-OFF™ branded program, the Company enables card issuers and sponsors to issue debit, pre-paid and gift cards under their own branded programs through licensed use of the mobile banking platform and the Company’s provision of related professional services.

The Company released its blinxPay™ mobile wallet application during fiscal year 2016. blinxPay™ is a secure payment processing system and mobile app that enables customers to make purchases at participating merchants using funds loaded into their blinxPay™ virtual account. The blinxPay™ mobile app is available for download for free at both Google Pay and Apple iTunes stores.

Veritec’s mobile banking solution also enables member card programs to be processed and settled member rewards to its members in either an open or closed loop processing environment. In addition to its front-end licensing and professional services, the Company also provides back-end card processing services to the card issuing institutions for all cardholder transactions on the licensed platform. The Company’s Mobile Banking Technology resides within a Payment Card Industry (PCI) compliant data processing center.

The Company was founded upon its intellectual property on its belief that its intellectual property will give the Company a commercial advantage in the global marketplace. The Company relies on patent, trade secret, copyright and trademark law, as well as the company’s contractual terms with its customers, to define, maintain and enforce the Company’s intellectual property rights in its Mobile Banking Technology and other technologies and relationships.

The Company has a portfolio of seven United States and eight foreign patents. In addition, we have three U.S. and eight foreign pending patent applications.

A significant amount of the Company’s intellectual property takes the form of trade secrets and copyrighted works of authorship. The Company treats the source code to its Mobile Banking Technology as trade secrets, and its licensed software applications are copyrightable subject matter.

We have a portfolio of registered and pending trademarks in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, including registrations for the marks “VSCode®” and “VeriCode®”. The Company uses “Veritec” as a ~~trade mark~~trademark and service mark, as well as it serving as the Company’s trade name.

During the year ended June 30, 2019, and 2018, the Company had one customer, a related party that represented 61% and 76% of our ~~revenues. No other customer represented more than 10% of our revenues.~~

~~During the year ended June 30, 2017, the Company had one customer, a related party, that represented 53% of our~~ revenues, ~~and one customer that represented 14% of our revenues.~~respectively. No other customer represented more than 10% of our revenues.

During the fiscal year 2018, we concentrated on several projects which included the development of our Mobile debit and member rewards banking platform, and the continued development and support of the liquid crystal display (LCD) business the VeriSuite™ Bio-ID software platform, the PhoneCodes™ software platform. All of these projects are currently in various stages of development or have been completed.

Our Mobile Banking Technology competes with other independent sales organizations and third party services of ~~Visa branded~~Visa-branded card programs, including TransCash Corporation, Ready Debit Card by MetaBank, Millenium Advantage Card by New Millenium Bank, and Wired Plastic by Bancorp Bank. The Company believes, however, that there are very few companies that have the Company’s collective attributes of (1) being an independent sales organization of ~~Visa branded~~Visa-branded and non-branded prepaid card programs, (2) being a third party servicer (e.g., back end processor) for banks issuing ~~Visa branded~~Visa-branded and non-branded prepaid card programs, (3) being the developer, marketer and licensor of the mobile banking platform on which ~~Visa branded~~Visa-branded and non-branded card program cardholder transactions take place, and (4) having a mobile banking platform that enables real-time transaction processing and enabling cardholders to manage their accounts by enabling cardholders to toggle their cards and their website accounts on and off via their mobile phones.

As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company employed ~~three~~two employees and nine independent contractor consultants.

For the years ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019, and ~~2017,~~2018, United States customers accounted for 100% of the Company’s total revenue.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.

We lease approximately 4,200 square feet of office and laboratory space at 2445 Winnetka Avenue North, Golden Valley, Minnesota, which serves as our primary place of business. This lease is with Van Thuy Tran, the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Our lease is currently on a month-to-month term and requires monthly payments of ~~$4,250 through March 30, 2019.~~$4,250.

On or about November 13, 2017, David A. Badhwa and Denise a Badhwa (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a lawsuit in district court in Hennepin County, Minnesota asserting that the Company breached the terms of a promissory note. Plaintiffs ~~seek~~sought repayment on the principal of the promissory note, in the amount of $100,000, $10,000 of which Plaintiffs contend Veritec previously paid, plus interest, collection costs and attorney’s fees. As of May 15, 2018, the date of the last communication on the amount of recovery ~~that~~from Plaintiffs, ~~seek,~~the Plaintiffs sought an award or settlement in the amount of $162,990. ~~If Plaintiff’s prevail on~~As of June 30, 2019, the Company had recorded a promissory note payable of $166,921 related to this proceeding.

On July 10, 2019, the Company and Plaintiffs entered into a Confidential Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release, whereas, both the Company and the Plaintiffs agreed to generally discharge and forever release each other from future claims, to pay their ~~claims, the Court could award Plaintiffs the unpaid principal in the amount of $90,000, plus interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum on the unpaid balance, as well as attorney’s~~own legal fees, ~~incurred by Plaintiffs in seeking payment on~~and the promissory note ~~in an amount determined by~~payable to the ~~Court. An award of attorney’s fees could be significant. Veritec has vigorously defended~~ Plaintiffs claims and has asserted a variety of counterclaims against Plaintiffs. Veritec has also attempted to engage Plaintiffs in settlement discussions, but Plaintiffs have not engaged in meaningful negotiations to resolve the claims in dispute.was discharged.

On September 21, 2016, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with an individual who was a former officer of the Company. The individual in prior years was also issued 500,000 shares of common stock for services. The Company alleged that the individual used the Company's intellectual property without approval. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the individual agreed to relinquish a convertible note payable and unpaid interest aggregating $364,686, and return 500,000 shares of common stock previously issued to him. In turn, the Company agreed to release and discharge the individual against all claims arising on or prior to the date of the settlement agreement. ~~The Company recorded a gain on the settlement of $364,686 in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended June 30, 2017.~~ As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the 500,000 shares have not been relinquished. When the Company receives the shares, it will record a cancellation of shares.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCPink marketplace under the symbol VRTC. Prior to that, our common stock was quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board. Prior to September 4, 2009, our common stock was traded in the over the counter markets and quoted on the OTC Pink Sheets. The following table sets forth the range of high and low bid quotes of our common stock per quarter as provided by the National Quotation Bureau (which reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions).

As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, there were approximately ~~793~~795 shareholders of record, inclusive of those brokerage firms and/or clearinghouses holding our common shares for their clientele.

We have not declared any cash dividends since inception and do not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends is within the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on the Company’s earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, and other relevant factors. There are no restrictions that currently limit the Registrant’s ability to pay dividends on its Common Stock other than those generally imposed by applicable state law.

No unregistered sales of equity securities occurred during the years ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019, and ~~2017.~~2018.

The following table sets forth information with respect to shares of common stock issuable under outstanding awards granted pursuant to our equity compensation plan.

(1) The Board of Directors authorized the Chief Executive Officer to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in the form of options or stock bonuses to employees and consultants. The Company has agreements with certain employees that provide for five years of annual grants of options, on each employment anniversary date, to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. The option price is determined based on the market price on the date of grant, the options vest one year from the date of grant, and the options expire five years after vesting. The Board of Directors granted 1,150,000 stock options to directors and employees under this arrangement in 2019. The Company granted no stock options or stock bonuses to employees and consultants under this arrangement in ~~2018 and 2017, respectively.~~2018.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. See “Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors discussed elsewhere in this report.

The following discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations is based on the preparation of our financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. You should read this discussion and analysis together with such financial statements and the related notes thereto.

Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates, including those related to impairment of long-lived assets, including finite lived intangible assets, accrued liabilities, fair value of warrant derivatives and certain expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 to our financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and the related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Results of Operations – June 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to June 30, ~~2017~~2018

We had a net loss of $849,403 in the year ended June 30, 2019, compared to a net loss of $18,210 in the year ended June 30, ~~2018 compared to net loss of $1,369,807 in the year ended June 30, 2017.~~2018.

Mobile Banking Technology revenues include products such as the Company’s Blinx On-Off™ prepaid toggle Card and its Open Loop/Close Loop System and Bio ID Card Platform. Mobile Banking Technology uses web-based mobile technology to offer financial cardholders the very best technology in conducting secure financial transactions in real time, protecting personal identity, and financial account security. Mobile Banking Technology revenues for the year ended June 30, 2019, and 2018 were $120,009 and ~~2017 were~~ $121,901, ~~and $152,606,~~ respectively. The decrease in Mobile Banking Technology revenues was due to both the conclusion of certain long term contracts during the prior year and the Company not having a bank to sponsor its mobile banking solutions since fiscal year 2016 (see Note 1 to Consolidated Financial Statements).

Effective October 1, 2015, the Company entered into a management services agreement with the Matthews Group for which the Company agreed to manage its previous barcode technology business, on behalf of the Matthews Group, from October 1, 2015 to June 30, 2019. Per the terms of the management services agreement, the Company earned 20% of all revenues through May 31, 2017, and 35% of all revenues through June 30, 2019. For the years ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, revenue earned from the management services agreement was ~~$376,580~~$186,520 and ~~$172,930,~~$376,580, respectively.

Cost of sales for the year ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 totaled $229,891 and ~~2017 totaled~~ $247,408, ~~and $260,614,~~ respectively. The decrease in cost of sales was primarily from expense reductions, including bank sponsor fees, associated with our decline in Mobile Banking Technology revenues discussed above, as compared to the same period of the prior year.

General and administrative expenses for the year ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 totaled $604,959 and ~~2017 totaled~~ $587,166, ~~and $688,351,~~ respectively. The ~~decrease~~increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily ~~from expense reductions implemented during the period~~ due to ~~our reduction in Mobile Banking Technology revenues discussed above.~~increased legal and professional fees as compared to the same period of the prior year.

Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 ~~and 2017~~ totaled ~~$1,762~~$0 compared to ~~$67,612,~~$1,762, respectively. The decrease in sales and marketing expenses was primarily from the recording of a $50,000 expense during the year ended June 30, 2017, relating to an Exclusive Products Provider Agreement (See Note 9 of the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Research and development expenses for the year ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 totaled $18,750 and ~~2017 totaled~~ $29,997, ~~and $92,992,~~ respectively. The decrease in expenses was primarily related to decreased software development related activities as compared to the same period of the prior year.

During the year ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded a gain on settlement of a note payable to a former officer of $364,686 (see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). No similar activity occurred during the same period of the current year.

During the year ended June 30, 2018, the Company recognized income related to the change in fair value of derivative liabilities of ~~$603,000 (see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), and~~$603,000. No similar activity occurred during the ~~year ended June 30, 2017, the Company recognized expenses related to the change in fair value of derivative liabilities of $546,000.~~current year.

Interest expense ~~which includes financing costs,~~ for the year ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, was $302,332 and ~~2017, was~~ $253,358, ~~and $404,460,~~ respectively. The ~~decrease~~increase was due to the ~~result of certain non-cash financing costs that occurred during the prior year for which no similar activity occurred during the year ended June 30, 2018.~~increase in our notes payable balance.

Our cash balance at June 30, ~~2018 increased~~2019 decreased to ~~$139,086~~$91,112 as compared to ~~$46,693~~$139,086 at June 30, ~~2017.~~2018. The ~~increase~~decrease was the result of ~~$506,919~~$450,101 in cash used in operating activities offset by ~~$599,312~~$402,127 in cash provided by financing activities. Net cash used in operations during the year ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 was ~~$506,919~~$450,101 compared with ~~$1,030,580~~$506,919 of net cash used in operations during the same period of the prior year. Cash used in operations during the year ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 was primarily ~~due~~ to ~~deducting the income from the change in fair value of derivatives of $603,000 from~~fund our net loss of $849,403, offset by an increase in ~~the period~~accrued interest on notes payable of ~~$18,210.~~$302,332, stock-based compensation expense of $11,215, and general changes to our working capital accounts of $85,755. Net cash provided by financing activities of ~~$599,312~~$402,127 during the year ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 was due to proceeds received from notes payable. During the same period of the prior year, net cash provided by financing activities of ~~$1,016,320~~$599,312 was from proceeds received from notes payable.

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. During the year ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company incurred a loss of ~~$18,210~~$849,403 and used cash in operating activities of ~~$506,919,~~$450,101, and at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company had a stockholders’ deficiency of ~~$4,461,189.~~$5,299,377. In addition, as of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company is delinquent in payment of ~~$761,315~~$795,792 of its notes payable. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date that the financial statements are issued. In addition, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in its report on our June 30, ~~2018~~2019 financial statements, has raised substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

The Company believes its cash and forecasted cash flow from operations will not be sufficient to continue operations through fiscal ~~2019~~2020 without continued external investment. The Company believes it will require additional funds to continue its operations through fiscal ~~2019~~2020 and to continue to develop its existing projects and plans to raise such funds by finding additional investors to purchase the Company’s securities, generating sufficient sales revenue, implementing dramatic cost reductions or any combination thereof. There is no assurance that the Company can be successful in raising such funds, generating the necessary sales or reducing major costs. Further, if the Company is successful in raising such funds from sales of equity securities, the terms of these sales may cause significant dilution to existing holders of common stock.

The Company has traditionally been dependent on The Matthews Group, LLC, a related party, for its financial support. The Matthews Group is owned 50% by Van Tran, the Company’s CEO/Executive Chair and a director, and 50% by Lawrence J. Johanns, a significant Company stockholder.

Notes payable includes principal and accrued interest and consists of the following at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and June 30, ~~2017:~~2018:

(a) The notes are unsecured, convertible into common stock at amounts ranging from $0.08 to $0.30 per share, bear interest at rates ranging from 5% to 8% per annum, were due through 2011 and are in default or due on demand.

At June 30, 2017, convertible notes totaled ~~$205,116.~~$205,115. During the year ended June 30, 2018, interest of ~~$9,460~~$9,461 was added to principal leaving a balance owed of $214,576 at June 30, 2018. During the year ended June 30, 2019, interest of $9,461 was added to principal, leaving a balance owed of $224,037 at June 30, 2019. At June 30, ~~2018, $176,506~~2019, $184,506 of the convertible notes were in default, and convertible at a conversion price of $0.30 per share into ~~588,354~~615,021 shares of the Company’s common stock. Certain of the amounts due are subject to a legal proceeding. The balance of ~~$38,070~~$39,531 is due on demand and convertible at a conversion price of $0.08 per share into ~~475,875~~494,137 shares of the Company’s common stock.

(b) The notes are either secured by the Company’s intellectual property or unsecured and bear interest ranging from 6.5% to 10% per annum, were due in 2012, and are in default.

At June 30, 2017, the notes totaled ~~$370,207.~~$370,208. During the year ended June 30, 2018, interest of $17,477 was added to principal, leaving a balance owed of ~~$387,684~~$387,685 at June 30, 2018. During the year ended June 30, 2019, interest of $17,478 was added to principal leaving a balance owed of $405,162 at June 30, 2019. At June 30, ~~2018, $351,901~~2019, $365,379 of notes are secured by the Company’s intellectual property and ~~$35,783~~$39,783 of notes are unsecured.

On March 18, 2019 and June 6, 2019, the Company entered into notes payable for $10,000 and $15,000, respectively. During the period, interest of $153 was added to principal, leaving a balance owed of $25,153 at June 30, 2019.

Notes payable-related party includes principal and accrued interest and consists of the following at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and June 30, ~~2017:~~2018:

(a) The notes are unsecured, convertible into common stock at $0.08 per share, bear interest at rates ranging from 8% to 10% per annum, and are due on demand.

The Matthews Group ~~(see Note 9 to accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements)~~is a related party and is owned 50% by Ms. Van Tran, the Company’s CEO, and 50% by Larry Johanns, a significant shareholder of the Company. At June 30, 2017, convertible notes due to The Matthews Group totaled $1,236,943. During the year ended June 30, 2018, interest of $107,839 was added to principal leaving a balance ~~owed to~~payable of $1,344,782 at June 30, 2018. During the year ended June 30, 2019, interest of $107,839 was added to principal leaving a balance payable of $1,452,621 at June 30, 2019. At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the notes are convertible at a conversion price of $0.08 per share into ~~16,809,779~~18,157,765 shares of the Company’s common stock.

(b) The notes are unsecured, accrue interest at 10% per annum, and are due on demand. The notes were issued relating to a management services agreement with The Matthews Group dated September 30, ~~2015 (see Note 9 to accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements).~~2015. At June 30, 2017, notes ~~payable~~due to The Matthews Group ~~was~~totaled $805,195. During the year ended June 30, 2018, $599,312 of notes payable were issued, interest of ~~$104,581 was~~$104,581was added to principal, and an interest payment of $125,000 was made, leaving a balance owed of ~~$1,384,088.~~$1,384,088 at June 30, 2018. During the year ended June 30, 2019, $377,127 of notes payable were issued, and interest of $153,403 was added to principal, leaving a balance owed of $1,914,618 at June 30, 2019.

(c) The notes are due to a current and a former director, are unsecured, convertible into common stock at per share amounts ranging from ~~$0.10~~$0.08 to $0.30, and bear interest at rates ranging from 8% to 10% per annum.

At June 30, 2017, convertible notes due to other related parties totaled $251,728. During the year ended June 30, 2018, interest of ~~$14,000~~$14,001 was added to principal leaving a balance owed of ~~$265,728~~$265,729 at June 30, 2018. During the year ended June 30, 2019, interest of $13,999 was added to principal leaving a balance owed of $279,728 at June 30, 2019. At June 30, ~~2018, $197,124~~2019, $206,124 of the notes were due in 2010 and are in default, and the balance of ~~$68,604~~$73,604 is due on demand. At June 30, ~~2018, $197,124~~2019, $206,124 of the notes are convertible at a conversion price of $0.30 per share into ~~657,081 shares of the Company’s common stock, $20,581 of the notes are convertible at a conversion price of $0.10 per share into 205,812~~687,081 shares of the Company’s common stock, and ~~$48,023~~$73,604 of the notes are convertible at a conversion price of $0.08 per share into ~~600,285~~920,050 shares of the Company’s common stock.

The Company ~~has one annual lease commitment of $51,000 for the~~leases its corporate office building ~~which is leased~~ from Ms. Tran, our chief executive officer, ~~with an expiration date of March 30, 2019.~~on a month-to-month basis, for $4,250 per month. The ~~commitment~~corporate office is ~~for the corporate offices~~located at 2445 Winnetka Avenue North, Golden Valley, Minnesota. ~~The total amount of the remaining lease commitment is $38,250 at June 30, 2018.~~

The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in capital raising transactions, for services, and ~~for~~ financing costs. The Company accounts for stock option and stock warrant grants to employees based on the authoritative guidance provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board where the value of the award is measured on the date of grant and recognized over the vesting period. The Company accounts for stock option and stock warrant grants to non-employees in accordance with the authoritative guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board where the value of the stock compensation is determined based upon the measurement date at either a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete. Non-employee stock-based compensation charges generally are amortized over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. In certain circumstances where there are no future performance requirements by the non-employee, option or warrant grants are immediately vested, and the total stock-based compensation charge is recorded in the period of the measurement date.

The fair value of the Company’s common stock option and warrant grants are estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, which uses certain assumptions related to risk-free interest rates, expected volatility, expected life of the common stock options, and future dividends. Compensation expense is recorded based upon the value derived from the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and based on actual experience. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes ~~option pricing~~option-pricing model could materially affect compensation expense recorded in future periods.

Revenues for the Company are classified into mobile banking technology and management fee revenue.

The Company, as a merchant payment processor and a distributor, recognizes revenue from transaction fees charged to cardholders for the use of its issued mobile debit cards. The fees are recognized on a monthly basis after all cardholder transactions have been summarized and reconciled with third party processors.

Prior to the year ended June 30, 2016, the Company entered into certain long term agreements to provide application development and support. Some customers paid the agreement in full at signing and the Company recorded the receipt of payment as deferred revenue. The Company records revenue relating to these agreements on a pro-rata basis over the term of the agreement and reduces its deferred revenue balance accordingly.

On September 30, 2015, the Company sold all of its assets of its Barcode Technology comprised solely of its intellectual property to The Matthews Group ~~(see Note 9)~~ and entered into a management services agreement with The Matthews Group to manage all facets of the barcode technology operations, on behalf of The Matthews Group, through June 30, 2019. The Company ~~earns~~earned a fee of 20% of all revenues billed from the barcode technology operations up to May 31, 2017, and 35% of all revenues billed up to June 30, 2019.

See Footnote 1 of consolidated financial statements for a discussion of recently issued accounting standards.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Veritec, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficiency, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has had recurring losses from operations and had a stockholders’ deficiency as of June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regards to these matters are also described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this ~~uncertainty~~uncertainty.

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

VERITEC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY

VERITEC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Veritec is primarily engaged in the development, sales, and licensing of products and providing services related to its mobile banking solutions.

As a Cardholder Independent Sales Organization, Veritec is able to promote and sell ~~Visa branded~~Visa-branded card programs. As a Third-Party Servicer, Veritec provides back-end cardholder transaction processing services for ~~Visa branded~~Visa-branded card programs on behalf of its sponsoring bank. Veritec has a portfolio of five United States and eight foreign patents. In addition, we have seven U.S. and twenty-eight foreign pending patent applications. Veritec has had agreements with various banks ~~including Security First Bank (terminated~~ in 2010), Palm Desert National Bank (which was later assigned to First California Bank and subsequently Pacific Western Bank that terminated in 2013), and Central Bank of Kansas City (terminated in 2016). Veritec isthe past andis currently seeking a bank to sponsor its Prepaid Card programs.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its ~~wholly owned subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions and balances were eliminated in consolidation. Veritec’s wholly owned~~wholly-owned subsidiaries ~~include~~ Veritec Financial Systems, Inc., Tangible Payment Systems, Inc., and Public Bell, Inc. (collectively the “Company”). Intercompany transactions and balances were eliminated in consolidation.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Those estimates and assumptions include estimates for reserves of uncollectible accounts, analysis of impairments of ~~long lived~~long-lived assets, accruals for potential liabilities, assumptions made in valuing stock instruments issued for services, and valuation of deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

The Company sells to domestic and foreign companies and grants uncollateralized credit to customers but requires deposits on unique orders. Management periodically reviews its accounts receivable and provides an allowance for doubtful accounts after analyzing the age of the receivable, payment history and prior experience with the customer. The estimated loss that management believes is probable is included in the allowance for doubtful accounts. While the ultimate loss may differ, management believes that any additional loss will not have a material impact on the Company's financial position. Due to uncertainties in the settlement process, however, it is at least reasonably possible that management's estimate will change during the near term. Based on management’s assessment, no allowance for doubtful accounts was considered necessary at June 30, 2019, or 2018.

Revenues for the Company are classified into management fee revenue and mobile banking technology.

Prior to July 1, 2018, the Company recognized its revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 605Revenue Recognition , upon the delivery of its services or ~~2017.~~products when: (1) delivery had occurred or services rendered; (2) persuasive evidence of an arrangement existed; (3) there are no continuing obligations to the customer; and (4) the collection of related accounts receivable was probable.

Effective July 1, 2018, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASC 606”) which superseded previous revenue recognition guidance. The underlying principle of ASC 606 is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at the amount expected to be collected. ASC 606 creates a five-step model that requires entities to exercise judgment when considering the terms of contracts, which includes (1) identifying the contracts or agreements with a customer, (2) identifying the Company’s performance obligations in the contract or agreement, (3) determining the transaction price, (4) allocating the transaction price to the separate performance obligations, and (5) recognizing revenue as each performance obligation is satisfied. The Company only applies the five-step model to contracts when it is probable that the Company will collect the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the services it transfers to its clients. The Company has concluded that the new guidance did not require any significant change to its revenue recognition processes and the implementation of ASC 606 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

~~Revenues for the Company are classified into mobile banking technology and management fee revenue.~~

The Company has entered into certain long term agreements to provide application development and support. Some customers paid the agreement in full at signing and the Company recorded the receipt of payment as deferred revenue. The Company records revenue relating to these agreements on a pro-rata basis over the term of the agreement and reduces its deferred revenue balance accordingly.

On September 30, 2015, the Company sold all of its assets of its Barcode Technology, which was comprised solely of its intellectual property, to The Matthews Group (a related party, see Note 9). The Company subsequently entered into a management services agreement with The Matthews Group to manage all facets of the barcode technology operations through June 30, 2019. The Company earned a fee of 20% of all revenues billed from the barcode technology operations up to May 31, 2017, and now earns a fee of 35% of all revenues billed up to June 30, ~~2019.~~

The Company evaluates its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities,following table shows the ~~derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value~~Company’s disaggregated net sales by product type:

The following table shows the Company’s disaggregated net sales by customer type:

During the years ended June 30, 2019 and ~~is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes~~2018, all of the Company’s revenues were earned in the ~~fair value reported in the consolidated statements~~United States of operations. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within twelve (12) months of the balance sheet date.America.

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing the net income (loss) applicable to Common Stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) applicable to Common Stockholders by the weighted average number of common stock outstanding plus the number of additional common stock that would have been outstanding if all dilutive potential common stock had been issued, using the treasury stock method. ~~Potential common stock are excluded from the computation as their effect is antidilutive.~~

For the years ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the calculations of basic and diluted loss per share are the same because potential dilutive securities would have an anti-dilutive effect.

As of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, we excluded the outstanding securities summarized below, which entitle the holders thereof to acquire shares of common stock, from our calculation of earnings per share, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in ~~capital~~non-capital raising transactions, for services and for financing costs. The Company accounts for ~~stock option~~share-based payments under the guidance as set forth in the Share-Based Payment Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), which requires the measurement and ~~stock warrant grants~~recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees, officers, directors, and consultants, including employee stock options, based on estimated fair values. The Company estimates the ~~authoritative guidance provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) where the~~fair value of ~~the award is measured~~share-based payment awards to employees and directors on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model, and the value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the ~~vesting period.~~required service period in the Company’s statements of operations. The Company accounts for stock option and ~~stock~~ warrant grants issued and vesting to non-employees in accordance with the authoritative guidance ~~of the FASB where~~whereas the value of the stock compensation is ~~determined~~ based upon the measurement date as determined at either a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete. ~~Non-employee stock-based~~Stock-based compensation ~~charges generally~~is based on awards ultimately expected to vest and is reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are ~~amortized over~~estimated at the ~~vesting period on a straight-line basis. In certain circumstances where there are no future performance requirements by the non-employee, option or warrant grants are immediately vested~~time of grant and ~~the total stock-based compensation charge is recorded~~revised, as necessary, in ~~the period of the measurement date.~~subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

The fair value of the Company’s common stock option and warrant grants are estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, which uses certain assumptions related to risk-free interest rates, expected volatility, expected life of the common stock options, and future dividends. Compensation expense is recorded based upon the value derived from the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and based on actual experience. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model could materially affect compensation expense recorded in future periods.

The Company determines the fair value of its assets and liabilities based on the exchange price in U.S. dollars that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company uses a fair value hierarchy with three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, to measure fair value:

The carrying amounts of financial instruments such as cash, accounts receivable, ~~inventories,~~ and accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate the related fair values due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.

~~The fair value of the derivative liabilities of $728,000 at June 30, 2017, was valued using Level 2 inputs.~~

During the year ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company had one customer, a related party, that represented 61% and 76% of our ~~revenues.~~revenues, respectively. No other customer represented more than 10% of our ~~revenues.~~

During the year ended June 30, 2017, the Company had one customer, a related party, that represented 53% of our revenues and one customer that represented 14% of our revenues. No other customer represented more than 10% of our revenues.

~~During the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company had no foreign~~ revenues.

The Company operates in one segment, the mobile financial banking industry. In accordance with the “Segment Reporting” Topic of the ASC, the Company’s chief operating decision maker has been identified as the Chief Executive Officer and President, who reviews operating results to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance for the entire Company. Existing guidance, which is based on a management approach to segment reporting, establishes requirements to report selected segment information quarterly and to report annually entity-wide disclosures about products and services, major customers, and the countries in which the entity holds material assets and reports revenue. All material operating units qualify for aggregation under “Segment Reporting” due to their similar customer base and similarities in: economic characteristics; nature of products and services; and procurement, manufacturing and distribution processes. Since the Company operates in one segment, all financial information required by “Segment Reporting” can be found in the accompanying consolidated financial statements

In ~~May 2014,~~February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ~~(“FASB”)~~(FASB) issued ~~guidance creating~~ Accounting Standards ~~Codification (“ASC”) Section 606, “~~~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers.~~” ASC 606 creates a five-step model that requires entities to exercise judgment when considering the terms of contract(s), which includes (1) identifying the contract(s) or agreement(s) with a customer, (2) identifying our performance obligations in the contract or agreement, (3) determining the transaction price, (4) allocating the transaction price to the separate performance obligations, and (5) recognizing revenue as each performance obligation is satisfied. Under ASC 606, revenue is recognized when performance obligations under the terms of a contract are satisfied, which occurs for the company upon shipment or delivery to our customers based on written sales terms, which is also when control is transferred. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for transferring products or services to a customer. The updated guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within that year. The Company will adopt this guidance effective July 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method applied to all contracts not completed as of July 1, 2018. Due to the nature of the products sold by the Company, the adoption of the new standard will have no quantitative effect on the Company’s financial statements.

~~In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU~~Update (ASU) No. 2016-02,Leases, which was subsequently amended in 2018 by ASU 2018-10, ASU 2018-11 and ASU 2018-20 (collectively, Topic 842). ~~ASU 2016-02 requires~~Topic 842 will require the recognition of a ~~lessee to record a right of use~~right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability, oninitially measured at the ~~balance sheet~~present value of the lease payments, for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. ~~ASU 2016-02~~For operating leases, the asset and liability will be expensed over the lease term on a straight-line basis, with all cash flows included in the operating section of the statement of cash flows. For finance leases, interest on the lease liability will be recognized separately from the amortization of the right-of-use asset in the statement of comprehensive income and the repayment of the principal portion of the lease liability will be classified as a financing activity while the interest component will be included in the operating section of the statement of cash flows. Topic 842 is effective for ~~all~~annual and interim ~~and annual~~ reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. ~~A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital~~Upon adoption, leases will be recognized and ~~operating leases existing~~measured at ~~or entered into after,~~ the beginning of the earliest ~~comparative~~ period presented using a modified retrospective approach. Topic 842 allows for a cumulative-effect adjustment in the ~~financial statements, with certain practical expedients available.~~period the new lease standard is adopted and will not require restatement of prior periods. The Company plans to adopt ASU 2018-07 on July 1, 2019, , though the adoption is ~~in the process of evaluating the~~expected to have no impact ~~of ASU 2016-02~~ on the Company’s financial statements and related disclosures as the Company does not have leases with terms longer than 12 months.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07,Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to nonemployee share-based payment accounting. This ASU simplifies the accounting and reporting for share-based payments issued to nonemployees by expanding the scope of ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation , which currently only includes share-based compensation to employees, to also include share-based payments to nonemployees for goods and services. The standard is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that fiscal year. Early adoption is permitted, but no earlier than a company’s adoption date of ASC 606. The Company plans to adopt ASU 2018-07 on July 1, 2019. The adoption of ASU 2018-07 is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s financial statements and related disclosures.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. During the year ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company recorded a loss of ~~$18,210,~~$849,403, used cash in operating activities of ~~$506,919,~~$450,101, and at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company had a stockholders’ deficiency of ~~$4,461,189.~~$5,299,377. In addition, as of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company is delinquent in payment of ~~$761,315~~$795,792 of its notes payable. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date that the financial statements are issued. In addition, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in its report on our June 30, 2018 financial statements, has raised substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

The Company believes it will require additional funds to continue its operations through fiscal ~~2019~~2020 and to continue to develop its existing projects and plans to raise such funds by finding additional investors to purchase the Company’s securities, generating sufficient sales revenue, implementing dramatic cost reductions or any combination thereof. There is no assurance that the Company can be successful in raising such funds, generating the necessary sales or reducing major costs. Further, if the Company is successful in raising such funds from sales of equity securities, the terms of these sales may cause significant dilution to existing holders of common stock. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from this uncertainty.

On September 30, 2014, ~~the Company and Tangible Payments LLC, a Maryland Limited Liability Company, entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement pursuant to which~~ the Company acquired certain assets and liabilities of the Tangible Payments LLC. Tangible Payments LLC developed online payment technology that encrypts sensitive information securely between customers and merchants during online transactions.

The purchase price for the acquisition was comprised of 250,000 shares of restricted common stock of Veritec valued at $37,500, issued on closing, and an earnout payment of $155,000 for an aggregate purchase price of $192,500. The earnout payment is payable on a monthly basis from the net profits derived from the acquired assets commencing three months after the closing. The earnout payment is accelerated and the balance of the earnout payment shall be due in full at such time as Veritec receives equity investments aggregating $1,300,000. For the years ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, there was no net profit derived from the acquired assets and accordingly, no payments were made on the earnout.

The Company assigned $192,500 of the purchase price to contract commitments (“intangible”) which were amortized over a ~~three~~three-year period. During the year ~~period. For the years~~ ended June 30, 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ the Company recorded $16,042 ~~and $64,166~~ of amortization expense related to this intangible ~~which is included in general~~ and ~~administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of~~at June 30, 2018, ~~there~~the intangible was fully amortized. Accordingly, no ~~remaining unrecognized~~further amortization expense was recorded related to this intangible ~~assets.~~during the year ended June 30, 2019.

Notes payable includes principal and accrued interest and consists of the following at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and June 30, ~~2017:~~2018:

At June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, convertible notes totaled ~~$195,655. During the year ended June 30, 2017, interest of $9,460 was added to principal, leaving a balance owed of $205,116 at June 30, 2017.~~$205,115. During the year ended June 30, 2018, interest of $9,461 was added to principal leaving a balance owed of $214,576 at June 30, 2018. During the year ended June 30, 2019, interest of $9,461 was added to principal, leaving a balance owed of $224,037 at June 30, 2019. At June 30, ~~2018, $176,506~~2019, $184,506 of the convertible notes were in default, and convertible at a conversion price of $0.30 per share into ~~588,354~~615,021 shares of the Company’s common stock. Certain of the amounts due are subject to a legal proceeding (see Note ~~10)~~9). The balance of ~~$38,070~~$39,531 is due on demand and convertible at a conversion price of $0.08 per share into ~~475,875~~494,137 shares of the Company’s common stock.

(b) The notes are either secured by the Company’s intellectual property or unsecured and bear interest ranging from 6.5% to 10% per annum, were due in 2012, and are in default.

At June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the notes totaled ~~$352,729 and during the year ended June 30, 2017, interest of $17,478 was added to principal, leaving a balance owed of $370,207 at June 30, 2017.~~$370,208. During the year ended June 30, 2018, interest of $17,477 was added to principal, leaving a balance owed of ~~$387,684~~$387,685 at June 30, 2018. During the year ended June 30, 2019, interest of $17,477 was added to principal leaving a balance owed of $405,162 at June 30, 2019. At June 30, ~~2018, $351,901~~2019, $365,379 of notes are secured by the Company’s intellectual property and ~~$35,783~~$39,783 of notes are unsecured.

Notes payable-related ~~party~~parties includes principal and accrued interest and consists of the following at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and June 30, ~~2017:~~2018:

(a) The notes are unsecured, convertible into common stock at $0.08 per share, bear interest at rates ranging from 8% to 10% per annum, and are due on demand.

The Matthews Group is a related party (see Note 9)8) and is owned 50% by Ms. Van Tran, the Company’s CEO, and 50% by Larry Johanns, a significant shareholder of the Company. At June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, convertible notes due to The Matthews Group totaled $669,648. During the year ended June 30, 2017, $477,500 of convertible notes were issued and interest of $89,795 was added to principal leaving a balance payable of $1,236,943 at June 30, 2017. The Company determined that upon issuance of certain convertible notes issued in the second quarter of fiscal 2017, there become insufficient authorized shares of common stock available for conversion. Accordingly, the fair value of the conversion features for these convertible notes were recorded as derivative liabilities with a corresponding discount to the related notes. The Company determined the fair value of the conversion features were $182,000 (see Note 5). As the convertible notes are due on demand, the $182,000 discount was expensed upon issuance.$1,236,943. During the year ended June 30, 2018, interest of $107,839 was added to principal leaving a balance payable of $1,344,782 at June 30, 2018. During the year ended June 30, 2019, interest of $107,839 was added to principal leaving a balance payable of $1,452,621 at June 30, 2019. At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the notes are convertible at a conversion price of $0.08 per share into ~~16,809,779~~18,157,765 shares of the Company’s common stock.

(b) The notes are unsecured, accrue interest at 10% per annum, and are due on demand. The notes were issued relating to a management services agreement with The Matthews Group (see Note 9)8) dated September 30, 2015. At June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, notes due to The Matthews Group totaled ~~$216,648. During the year ended June 30, 2017, $538,820 of notes payable were issued and interest of $49,727 was added to principal leaving a balance owed of~~ $805,195. During the year ended June 30, 2018, $599,312 of notes payable were issued, interest of ~~$104,581was~~$104,581 was added to principal, and an interest payment of $125,000 was made, leaving a balance owed of $1,384,088 at June 30, 2018. During the year ended June 30, 2019, $377,127 of notes payable were issued and interest of $153,403 was added to principal, leaving a balance owed of $1,914,618 at June 30, 2019.

At June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, convertible notes due to other related parties totaled ~~$237,725. During the year ended June 30, 2017, interest of $14,003 was added to principal leaving a balance owed of $251,728 at June 30, 2017.~~$251,728. During the year ended June 30, 2018, interest of $14,001 was added to principal leaving a balance owed of $265,729 at June 30, 2018. During the year ended June 30, 2019, interest of $13,999 was added to principal leaving a balance owed of $279,728 at June 30, 2019. At June 30, ~~2018, $197,124~~2019, $206,124 of the notes were due in 2010 and are in default, and the balance of ~~$68,605~~$73,604 is due on demand. At June 30, ~~2018, $197,124~~2019, $206,124 of the notes are convertible at a conversion price of $0.30 per share into ~~657,080 shares of the Company’s common stock, $20,581 of the notes are convertible at a conversion price of $0.10 per share into 205,810~~687,081 shares of the Company’s common stock, and ~~$48,024~~$73,604 of the notes are convertible at a conversion price of $0.08 per share into ~~600,289~~920,050 shares of the Company’s common stock.

During fiscal 2017, the Company determined there were insufficient authorized shares of common stock available for conversion of certain of its convertible notes issued in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 (See Note 4) and therefore the conversion feature of the notes did not meet equity classification. Based on this, the Company recorded derivative liabilities of $182,000 upon the issuance of these convertible notes. Subsequent to this recording and through June 30, 2017, the Company recorded a change in the fair value of the derivative liabilities of $546,000. At June 30, 2017, total derivative liabilities were $728,000. On April 18, 2018, the Company increased its authorized shares from 50,000,000 to 150,000,000 shares and therefore, the Company determined it had sufficient authorized shares available to meet equity classification for the conversion features of its convertible notes. Accordingly, on April 14, 2018, the Company remeasured the derivative liabilities to their fair value of $125,000, and recorded a gain in fair value of the derivative of $603,000. The balance of the derivative of $125,000 was then reclassified to equity and recorded as a credit to additional paid-in capital in accordance with ASC 815-15-35-4.

~~The derivative liability was valued at the following dates using a Black-Scholes-Merton model with the following assumptions:~~

The risk-free interest rate was based on rates established by the Federal Reserve Bank. The Company used its own historical stock’s volatility as the estimated volatility. The expected life of the conversion feature of the notes or options was based on the estimated remaining terms of the notes or options, or expected settlement date for notes due on demand or that have matured. The expected dividend yield was based on the fact that the Company has not customarily paid dividends to its holders of common stock in the past and does not expect to pay dividends to holders of its common stock in the future.

The articles of incorporation of Veritec authorize 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $1.00 per share. The Board of Directors is authorized to determine any number of series into which shares of preferred stock may be divided and to determine the rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions granted to any series of the preferred stock.

In 1999, a new Series H convertible preferred stock was authorized. Each share of Series H convertible preferred stock is convertible into 10 shares of the Veritec’s common stock at the option of the holder. As of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, there were 1,000 shares of Series H convertible preferred stock issued and outstanding.

On February 2, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors voted to increase the Company’s authorized common shares from 50,000,000 shares to 150,000,000 common shares. The Company filed the ~~requisite~~required documentation with the State of Nevada in April 2018, with an effective date of April 18, 2018.

At June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, 145,000 shares of common stock to be issued with an aggregate value of $12,500 have not been issued and are reflected as common stock to be issued in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

A summary of stock options as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and for the two years then ended is as follows:

In December 2018, the Company granted to its directors and employees, stock options to purchase an aggregate of 1,150,000 shares of Common Stock. The fair value of the stock options granted was determined to be $21,285 and is being amortized over the vesting period of 12 months. During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $11,215. As of June 30, 2019, the Company has outstanding unvested options with future compensation costs of $10,070, which will be recorded as compensation cost as the options vest over their remaining average vesting period of six months. The Company did not grant stock options during the prior year ended June 30, 2018.

The Company has agreements with certain employees that provide for five years of annual grants of options, on each employment anniversary date, to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. The option price is determined based on the market price on the date of grant, the options vest one year from the date of grant, and the options expire five years after vesting. The Company granted 2,500,000 options under this arrangement. There were no options granted in 2018 and 2017 under this agreement. Both the outstanding and exercisable stock options had noan intrinsic value of $11,500 and $5,750, respectively, at June 30, ~~2018.~~

The fair value of each option on the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

Additional information regarding options outstanding as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019, is as follows:

For the ~~years~~year ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, net ~~income~~loss was ~~$106,790,~~$849,403, as compared to a net loss of ~~$1,369,907~~$18,210 for the year ended June 30, ~~2017.~~2018. For the years ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, no provision for income taxes was recorded. We made no provision for income taxes due to our utilization of federal net operating loss ~~carry forwards~~carryforwards to offset both regular taxable income and alternative minimum taxable income.

Reconciliation between the expected federal income tax rate and the actual tax rate is as follows:

The Company has provided a valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 to reduce such asset to zero, since there is no assurance that the Company will generate future taxable income to utilize such asset. Management will review this valuation allowance requirement periodically and make adjustments as warranted. The net change in the valuation allowance for the year ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019, was ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$111,000.~~$823,000.

Veritec has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately ~~$12,284,000~~$12,602,000 million for federal purposes available to offset future taxable income that ~~expire~~expires in varying amounts through ~~2035.~~2036. The ability to utilize the net operating loss ~~carry forwards~~carryforwards could be limited by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code which limits their use if there is a change in control (generally a greater than 50% change in ownership). The Company is subject to examination by tax authorities for all years for which a loss ~~carry forward~~carryforward is utilized in subsequent periods.

The Company follows FASB guidelines that address the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under this guidance, we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. This guidance also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest, and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. As of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the Company did not have a liability for unrecognized tax benefits, and no adjustment was required at adoption.

The Company’s policy is to record interest and penalties on uncertain tax provisions as income tax expense. As of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the Company has no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

The Matthews Group is owned 50% by Ms. ~~Van~~ Tran, the Company’s CEO/Executive Chair and a director, and 50% by Larry Johanns, a significant stockholder of the Company. The Company has relied on The Matthews Group for funding (see Note 4).

Management Services Agreement and Related Notes Payable with Related Party

The Company’s Barcode Technology was invented by the founders of Veritec as a product identification system for identification and tracking of parts, components and products mostly in the liquid crystal display (LCD) markets and for secure identification documents, financial cards, medical records, and other ~~high security~~high-security applications. On September 30, 2015, the Company sold all of its assets of its Barcode Technology comprised solely of its intellectual property to The Matthews Group. The Company then entered into a management services agreement with The Matthews Group to manage all facets of the barcode technology operations, on behalf of The Matthews Group, through June 30, 2019. The Matthews Group bears the risk of loss from the barcode operations and has the right to the residual benefits of the barcode operations.

In consideration of the services provided by the Company to The Matthews Group, the Company earned a fee of 20% of all revenues up to May 31, 2017, and 35% of all revenues up to June 30, ~~2019~~2020, from the barcode technology operations. During the year ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the Company recorded management fee revenue related to this agreement of $186,520 and $376,580, ~~and $172,930,~~ respectively.

Additionally, pursuant to the management services agreement, all cash flow (all revenues collected less direct costs paid) of the barcode technology operations is retained by the Company as proceeds from unsecured notes payable due The Matthews Group. During the year ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, cash flow loans of ~~$599,312~~$377,127 and ~~$538,820,~~$599,312, respectively, were made to the Company at 10% interest per annum and due on demand. At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, cash flow loans of ~~$1,384,088~~$1,914,618 are due to The Matthews Group (see Note 4).

During the year ended June 30, 2017, the Company issued $477,500 of convertible notes payable to The Matthews Group. The convertible notes payable-related party can be converted at a price of $0.08 per share. The market price on the date some of the convertible notes payable-related party were issued was in excess of the conversion price, and as a result the Company recognized an expense of $35,000 which is included in interest expense.

~~No convertible notes were issued to The Matthews Group during the year ended June 30, 2018~~

From time to time, Ms. ~~Van~~ Tran, the Company’s CEO/Executive Chair, provides advances to finance the Company’s working capital requirements. As of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, total advances to Ms. ~~Van~~ Tran amounted to $100,360 and $96,110, respectively, and have been presented as accounts payable, related party on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand.

The Company leases its office facilities from Ms. ~~Tran.~~Tran, the Company’s CEO/Executive Chair. For both the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017, rental~~lease payments to Ms. ~~Van~~ Tran totaled $51,000.

On March 1, 2017, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Public Bell, Inc., entered into an Exclusive Product Provider Agreement (“Agreement”) with an affiliate of American Heritage College (AHC). Ms. Van Tran, the Company’s CEO/Executive Chair, is a part owner of the affiliate of AHC. Public Bell paid AHC $50,000 in exchange for AHC agreeing to purchase Wi-Fi/WiMax broadband equipment exclusively from Public Bell and for the exclusive right to provide future products and services to AHC. During the year ended June 30, 2017, the $50,000 paid to AHC was recorded to sales and marketing expense~~in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.~~

On December 5, 2008, the Company adopted an incentive compensation bonus plan to provide payments to key employees in the aggregated amount of 10% of pre-tax earnings in excess of $3,000,000 after the end of each fiscal year to be distributed annually to employees. As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company had not achieved an annual pre-tax earnings in excess of $3,000,000.

On December 5, 2008, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Van Thuy Tran, its Chief Executive Officer, providing for an annual base salary of $150,000 and customary medical and other benefits. The agreement may be terminated by either party upon 30 days’ notice. In the event the Company terminates the agreement without cause, Ms. Tran will be entitled to $1,000,000 payable upon termination, and she will be entitled to severance equal to 12 months compensation and benefits. The Company has also agreed to indemnify Ms. Tran against any liability or damages incurred within the scope of her employment.

During the year ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, salaries paid to Van Thuy Tran under this agreement totated $150,000 and $150,000.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Based upon an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures performed by our Chief Executive Officer as of the end of the period covered by this report, our Chief Executive Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures have not been effective as a result of a weakness in the design of internal control over financial reporting identified below.

As used herein, “disclosure controls and procedures” mean controls and other procedures of our company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our Chief Executive Officer/Chief Accounting Officer conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on management’s evaluation under the framework, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of June 30, 2018.

We identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting primarily attributable to (i) lack of segregation of incompatible duties; and (ii) insufficient Board of Directors representation. These weaknesses are due to our inadequate staffing during the period covered by this report and our lack of working capital to hire additional staff. Management has retained an outside, independent financial consultant to record and review all financial data, as well as prepare our financial reports, in order to mitigate this weakness. Although management will periodically re-evaluate this situation, at this point it considers that the risk associated with such lack of segregation of duties and the potential benefits of adding employees to segregate such duties are not ~~cost justified.~~cost-justified. We intend to hire additional accounting personnel to assist with financial reporting as soon as our finances will allow.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

No changes in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the year ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS, CONTROL PERSONS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

Each director will serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders, or until their respective successors have been elected and duly qualified. Directors serve one-year terms. The Board of Directors appoints officers.

Ms. Van Thuy Tran is the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. Ms. Tran controls a majority interest in the Company. She was President of Asia Consulting and Trading Company from 1979 to 1999, a company dealing with trade in the Pacific Rim countries. She is the co-founder of Circle of Love, providing mission work in Vietnam since 1993. She is the founder of Caring for Others, a non-profit organization with the vision of sharing what we have with others. She was the founder of Equal Partners, Inc., a construction and building company in Minnesota. Ms. Van Tran has a medical degree and worked in the medical field for over 17 years.

Laird E. Powers is a member of the Board and is a private investor in emerging technology companies. He has been involved with the Company since its early stages in 1986. In addition, for the past 31 years, he is the president and owner of a construction company in Northern California. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Psychology with a Mathematics minor from California State University - Hayward.

Steve Handy was appointed as a member of the Board on October 5, 2018. Mr. Handy currently provides senior financial and executive advisory services to both private and publicly traded companies. Mr. Handy previously served as Chief Financial Officer of Tix Corporation from March 2010 to October 2017. Prior to Tix Corporation, Mr. Handy held positions of increasing responsibility, including Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of SM&A, a former publicly traded professional services firm. In addition, Mr. Handy previously held various management roles in high technology manufacturing and service companies, including working in The Netherlands for a U.S. high technology manufacturer. Mr. Handy also served as Senior Auditor for Deloitte & Touche LLP. Mr. Handy holds the designations of Certified Public Accountant (CPA) and Chartered Global Management Accountant (CGMA).

Section16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “34 Act”) requires our officers and directors and persons owning more than ten percent of the Common Stock, to file initial reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Additionally, Item 405 of Regulation S-K under the 34 Act requires us to identify in our Form 10-K and proxy statement those individuals for whom one of the above referenced reports was not filed on a timely basis during the most recent year or prior years. To the best of our knowledge, all required reports were filed.

~~One meeting~~Three meetings of our Board of Directors was held in fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. The Audit Committee is currently comprised of one independent director who does qualify as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the NASDAQ Capital Market.

~~The~~Each of our current board of directors ~~has determined that one member of our board of directors, Laird Powers,~~ is independent under the revised listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. ~~We intend to maintain at least two independent directors on our board of directors in the future.~~

We have adopted a code of ethics, which is available on our website at https://www.veritecinc.com/management-team. Our code of ethics applies to all of our employees, including our officers and directors. If our Board grants any waivers of, or amendments to, the code of ethics to any of our executive officers or directors, we will disclose these matters through our website.

No family relationship has ever existed between any director, executive officer of the Company, and any person contemplated to become such.

Our directors, executive officers, and control persons have not been involved in any of the following events during the past five years:

We are committed to having sound corporate governance principles. We believe that such principles are essential to running our business efficiently and to maintaining our integrity in the marketplace.

There have been no changes to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors.

We believe that our directors should have the highest professional and personal ethics and values, consistent with our longstanding values and standards. They should have broad experience at the policy-making level in business or banking. They should be committed to enhancing stockholder value and should have sufficient time to carry out their duties and to provide insight and practical wisdom based on experience. Their service on other boards of public companies should be limited to a number that permits them, given their individual circumstances, to perform responsibly all director duties for us. Each director must represent the interests of all stockholders. When considering potential director candidates, the board of directors also considers the candidate’s character, judgment, diversity, age and skills, including financial literacy and experience in the context of our needs and the needs of the board of directors.

The following table summarizes all compensation for fiscal years ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 who was the only individual that served as a principal executive officer, and who was the only “Named Executive Officer” of the Company.

On December 5, 2008, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Van Thuy Tran providing for an annual base salary of $150,000 and customary medical and other benefits. The agreement may be terminated by either party upon 30 days’ notice. In the event the Company terminates the agreement without cause, Ms. Tran will be entitled to $1,000,000 payable upon termination and entitled to severance equal to 12 months compensation and benefits. The Company has also agreed to indemnify Ms. Tran against any liability or damages incurred within the scope of her employment.

The following table summarizes the compensation paid to our directors for the year ended June 30, ~~2018:~~2019:

None of our named executive officers has outstanding equity awards received as compensation, including unexercised options, stock that has not vested, or equity incentive plan awards, as of the end of the Company's last completed fiscal year.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The following table sets forth certain information as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 with respect to the holdings of: (1) each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our Common Stock; (2) each of our directors, nominees for director and named executive officers; and (3) all directors and executive officers as a group. To the best of our knowledge, each of the persons named in the table below as beneficially owning the shares set forth therein has sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to such shares, unless otherwise indicated.

Except as otherwise indicated below, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock held by them. Unless otherwise indicated, the principal address of each listed executive officer and director is 2445 Winnetka Avenue North, Golden Valley, MN 55427.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The Company's transactions with its officers, directors, and affiliates have been, and such future transactions will be, on terms no less favorable to the Company than could have been realized by the Company in arms-length transactions with non-affiliated persons and will be approved by the board of directors.

The Matthews Group is owned 50% by Ms. Van Tran, the Company’s ~~CEO/~~CEO, Executive Chair, and a director, and 50% by Larry Johanns, a significant stockholder of the Company. The Company has relied on The Matthews Group for funding.

Management Services Agreement and Related Notes Payable with Related Party

On September 30, 2015, the Company sold all of its assets of its Barcode Technology comprised solely of its intellectual property to The Matthews Group. The Company’s Barcode Technology was originally invented by the founders of Veritec as a product identification system for identification and tracking of parts, components and products mostly in the liquid crystal display (LCD) markets and for secure identification documents, financial cards, medical records and other high security applications. The Company has a management services agreement with The Matthews Group to manage all facets of the barcode technology operations, on behalf of The Matthews Group, through June 30, ~~2019.~~2020. The Matthews Group bears the risk of loss from the barcode operations and has the right to the residual benefits of the barcode operations. In consideration, the Company earns a fee of 20% of all revenues up to May 31, 2017, and 35% of all revenues up to June 30, ~~2019~~2020, from the barcode technology operations. During the year ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the Company recorded management fee revenue related to this agreement of ~~$376,580~~$186,520 and ~~$172,930,~~$376,580, respectively. Pursuant to the management services agreement, all cash flow (all revenues collected less direct costs paid) of the barcode technology operations is retained by the Company as proceeds from unsecured notes payable due The Matthews Group. During the year ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, cash flow loans of ~~$599,312~~$377,127 and ~~$538,820,~~$599,312, respectively, were made to the Company at 10% interest per annum and due on demand. At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, cash flow loans of ~~$1,384,088~~$1,914,618 are due to The Matthews Group.

As of both June 30, 2019 and 2018, $100,360 and ~~2017,~~ $96,110 of advances due to Ms. Van Tran have been presented as accounts payable, related party on the accompanying Consolidated Balance ~~Sheets.~~Sheets, respectively. The advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand.

The Company leases its office facilities from Ms. Tran. For both the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017, rental~~lease payments to Ms. Van Tran totaled ~~$50,400.~~$51,000.

The following table sets forth the fees billed to the Company for professional services rendered by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, for the years ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017:~~2018:

Audit Fees: Consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audits of our financial statements and reviews of our interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Nevada		95-3954373
(State or Other Jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)		Identification No.)

12445 Winnetka Avenue N. Golden Valley, MN		55427
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☐~~(Do~~ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	☒
Emerging Growth Company	☐

Title of Each Class	Trading Symbol	Name of Each Exchange on WHich Registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share	VRTC	OTC Pink

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS	3

PART I
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS	4
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS	76
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	76
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY	76
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	87
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCUSSION	87
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	98
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	109
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION	109
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	1514
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA	15
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	32
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	32
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION	32
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS, CONTROL PERSONS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT	33
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	35
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	36
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	36
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	37
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS	38
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY	38
SIGNATURES	39

Market Price Range of Common Stock	Fiscal 2018				Fiscal 2017				Fiscal 2019				Fiscal 2018
Quarter Ended	High		Low		High		Low		High		Low		High		Low
September 30	$	.11	$	.08	$	.12	$	.06	$	.04	$	.03	$	.11	$	.08
December 31	$	.08	$	.03	$	.10	$	.06	$	.05	$	.02	$	.08	$	.03
March 31	$	.08	$	.03	$	.11	$	.10	$	.19	$	.02	$	.08	$	.03
June 30	$	.05	$	.04	$	.16	$	.10	$	.09	$	.04	$	.05	$	.04

Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))		Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		—		—		—		—		—		—
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders⁽¹⁾		2,500,000	$	0.08		—		3,150,000	$	0.06		—
Total		2,500,000	$	0.08		—		3,150,000	$	0.06		—

	Year Ended June 30,				Increase (Decrease)
	2018		2017		$			%
Mobile Banking Technology	$	121,901	$	152,606	$	(30,705	)		(20.1	)
Other revenue, management fee related party		376,580		172,930		203,650			117.8
Total Revenues	$	498,481	$	325,536	$	172,945			53.1

	Year Ended June 30,				Increase (Decrease)
	2019		2018		$			%
Mobile banking technology	$	120,009	$	121,901	$	(1,892	)		(1.6	)
Other revenue, management fee - related party		186,520		376,580		(190,060	)		(50.5	)
Total Revenues	$	306,529	$	498,481	$	(191,952	)		(38.5	)

		June 30, 2018		June 30, 2017
(a)	Convertible notes-in default	$	214,576	$	205,116
(b)	Notes payable-in default		387,684		370,207
	Total notes-third parties	$	602,260	$	575,323

	June 30, 2019		June 30, 2018
(a) Convertible notes ($184,506 and $175,045 in default)	$	224,037	$	214,576
(b) Notes payable (in default)		405,162		387,685
(c) Notes payable		25,153		—
Total notes-third parties	$	654,352	$	602,261

		June 30, 2018		June 30, 2017
(a)	Convertible notes-The Matthews Group	$	1,344,782	$	1,236,943
(b)	Notes payable-The Matthews Group		1,384,088		805,195
(c)	Convertible notes-other related-in default		265,728		251,728
	Total notes-related party	$	2,994,598	$	2,293,866

	June 30, 2019		June 30, 2018
(a) Convertible notes-The Matthews Group	$	1,452,621	$	1,344,782
(b) Notes payable-The Matthews Group		1,914,618		1,384,088
(c) Convertible notes-other related-in default ($206,124 and $197,124)		279,728		265,729
Total notes-related party	$	3,646,967	$	2,994,599

	Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018	F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018	F-3
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficiency for the Years Ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018	F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-6 to F-16

	Fiscal Years Ended June 30,						Fiscal Years Ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2019			2018
Revenue:
Mobile banking technology revenue	$	121,901		$	152,606		$	120,009		$	121,901
Other revenue, management fee related party		376,580			172,930
Other revenue, management fee - related party								186,520			376,580
Total revenue		498,481			325,536			306,529			498,481

Cost of sales		247,408			260,614			229,891			247,408
Gross profit		251,073			64,922			76,638			251,073

Operating Expenses:
General and administrative (including $51,000 and $46,750, respectively, to related party)		587,166			688,351
General and administrative (including $51,000 and $51,000, respectively, to related party)								604,959			587,166
Sales and marketing		1,762			67,612			—			1,762
Research and development		29,997			92,992			18,750			29,997
Total operating expenses		618,925			848,955			623,709			618,925
Loss from operations		(367,852	)		(784,033	)		(547,071	)		(367,852	)

Other Income (Expense):
Interest expense, including $226,420 and $377,522, respectively, to related parties		(253,358	)		(404,460	)
Interest expense (including $275,242 and $226,420, respectively, to related parties)								(302,332	)		(253,358	)
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		603,000			(546,000	)		—			603,000
Gain on settlement of note payable to former officer		—			364,686
Total other income (expense)		349,642			(585,774	)		(302,332	)		349,642

Net Loss	$	(18,210	)	$	(1,369,807	)	$	(849,403	)	$	(18,210	)

Net Loss Per Common Share - Basic and Diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.00	)

Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding -
Basic and Diluted		39,538,007			39,538,007			39,538,007			39,538,007

See accompanying notes.

								Common									Preferred Stock			Common Stock
								Stock to		Additional							Shares		Amount	Shares		Amount		Common Stock to be Issued		Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Stockholders’ Deficiency
	Preferred Stock			Common Stock				be		Paid-in		Accumulated			Stockholders’
	Shares		Amount	Shares		Amount		Issued		Capital		Deficit			Deficiency
Balance, June 30, 2016	1,000	$	1,000	39,538,007	$	395,380	$	12,500	$	17,939,576	$	(21,581,628	)	$	(3,233,172	)
Beneficial conversion feature on issuance of convertible notes payable	—		—	—		—		—		35,000		—			35,000
Net Loss	—		—	—		—		—		—		(1,369,807	)		(1,369,807	)
Balance, June 30, 2017	1,000		1,000	39,538,007		395,380		12,500		17,974,576		(22,951,435	)		(4,567,979	)	1,000	$	1,000	39,538,007	$	395,380	$	12,500	$	17,974,576	$	(22,951,435	)	$	(4,567,979	)
Reclassification of embedded conversion option	—		—	—		—		—		125,000		—			125,000		—		—	—		—		—		125,000		—			125,000
Net Loss	—		—	—		—		—		—		(18,210	)		(18,210	)	—		—	—		—		—		—		(18,210	)		(18,210	)
Balance, June 30, 2018	1,000	$	1,000	39,538,007	$	395,380	$	12,500	$	18,099,576	$	(22,969,645	)	$	(4,461,189	)	1,000		1,000	39,538,007		395,380		12,500		18,099,576		(22,969,645	)		(4,461,189	)
Stock-based compensation																	—		—	—		—		—		11,215		—			11,215
Net Loss																	—		—	—		—		—		—		(849,403	)		(849,403	)
Balance, June 30, 2019																	1,000	$	1,000	39,538,007	$	395,380	$	12,500	$	18,110,791	$	(23,819,048	)	$	(5,299,377	)

See accompanying notes.

	Fiscal years ended June 30,
	2019
Real Estate	$	186,520	$	376,580
Medical		62,363		54,824
Associations		30,000		42,492
Education		12,000		12,000
Other		15,646		12,585
Total revenue	$	306,529	$	498,481

	June 30,				June 30,
	2018		2017		2019		2018
Series H Preferred Stock		10,000		10,000		10,000		10,000
Convertible Notes Payable		19,337,127		17,833,166		20,874,054		19,337,127
Options		2,500,000		2,500,000		3,650,000		2,500,000
Total		21,847,127		20,343,166		24,534,054		21,847,127

	•	Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
	•	Level 2 — Inputs, other than Level 1, that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
	•	Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

	April 18, 2018 (date reclassified to equity)			June 30, 2017			July 11, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (dates of inception)
Conversion feature:
Risk-free interest rate		1.24	%		1.50	%		0.07	%
Expected volatility		130	%		179	%		99% to 124%
Expected life (in years)		1 year			1-2.5 years			1-1.5 years
Expected dividend yield		—						—
Fair Value:
Conversion feature	$	125,000		$	728,000		$	182,000

	Number of Shares		Weighted - Average Exercise Price		Number of Shares		Weighted - Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at June 30, 2016		2,500,000	$	0.08
Granted		—		—
Forfeited		—	$	0.08
Outstanding at June 30, 2017		2,500,000	$	0.08		2,500,000	$	0.08
Granted		—		—		—		—
Forfeited		—	$	0.08		—	$	0.08
Outstanding at June 30, 2018		2,500,000	$	0.08		2,500,000	$	0.08
Exercisable at June 30, 2018		2,500,000	$	0.08
Granted						1,150,000		0.03
Forfeited						—	$	—
Outstanding at June 30, 2019						3,650,000	$	0.06
Exercisable at June 30, 2019						3,075,000	$	0.07

	2019
Exercise Price	$	0.03
Stock Price	$	0.03
Risk-free interest rate		2.63	%
Expected volatility		121	%
Expected life (in years)		2.0
Expected dividend yield		0	%

Options Outstanding at June 30, 2018								Options Exercisable at June 30, 2018
Options Outstanding at June 30, 2019												Options Outstanding at June 30, 2019							Options Exercisable at June 30, 2019
Range of Exercise	Range of Exercise	Number of Shares Outstanding		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number of Shares Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Range of Exercise	Number of Shares Outstanding		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number of Shares Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$	0.08		2,500,000		1.64	$	0.08		2,500,000	$	0.08	0.03		1,150,000		5.48	$	0.03		575,000	$	0.03
$												0.08		2,500,000		0.61	$	0.08		2,500,000	$	0.08
			2,500,000						2,500,000					3,650,000						3,075,000

Name	Office	Age
Van Thuy Tran	Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board, Treasurer	7374
Laird Powers	Director	7071
Steve Handy	Director	5051

1.	any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

2.	any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor ~~offences)~~offenses);

3.	being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or

4.	being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.

Name	Year		Salaries ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
Van Thuy Tran Chief Executive Officer		2018	$	150,000		—		—		—		—	$	150,000
Van Thuy Tran Chief Executive Officer		2017	$	150,000		—		—		—		—	$	150,000

Name	Year		Salaries ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
Van Thuy Tran Chief Executive Officer		2019	$	150,000		—		—		—		—	$	150,000
Van Thuy Tran Chief Executive Officer		2018	$	150,000		—		—		—		—	$	150,000

Name	Year	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($) (3)	Option Awards ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Van Tran Director and Chief Executive Officer (1)	2019	—	—	—	4,627	—	4,627
Steve Handy, Director (1)(2)	2019	—	—	—	4,627	—	4,627
Laird Powers, Director (1)(2)	2019	—	—	—	4,627	—	4,627

	(1)	Directors who are employed by the Company do not receive separate compensation for services on the Board of Directors. Members of the Board of Directors who are not employees of the Company currently receive no fees. In addition, members of the Board of Directors are reimbursed for any expenses incurred in attending the meetings.
	(2)	~~Mr. Lane resigned from~~During the ~~Board of Directors on May 7, 2018.~~ year ended June 30, 2019, the Company issued 250,000 stock options valued at $4,627.

Name	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned		Percent of Shares			Number of Shares Beneficially Owned		Percent of Shares
Laird Powers		252,984		0.4	%		252,984		0.6	%
Van Thuy Tran		229,250		0.6	%		229,250		0.6	%
Keith Lane		150,000		0.6	%
All Officers and Directors as a group (4 persons)		632,234		1.6	%
All Officers and Directors as a group (3 persons)							482,234		1.2	%
The Matthews Group LLC (1)		29,352,547		74.2	%		29,352,547		74.2	%

Fees	2018		2017		2019		2018
Weinberg & Company, CPAs
Audit fees	$	57,724	$	43,663	$	58,642	$	57,724
Audit Related Fees		—		—
Audit Related fees						—		—
Tax fees		—		—		—		—
All other fees		—		—		—		—
Total Fees	$	57,724	$	43,663	$	58,642	$	57,724

Exhibit Number	Ref	Description of Document
3.1		Restated Articles of Incorporation of Veritec, Inc. dated May 3, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to Veritec’s Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed on May 15, 2007).

3.2		Bylaws of Veritec, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) to Veritec’s Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, as filed on February 14, 2007).

31.1	*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1	*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS	*	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

		VERITEC, INC.
		a Nevada corporation

~~October 5, 2018~~September 30, 2019	By:	/s/ Van Thuy Tran
		Van Thuy Tran
		Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

Signature		Title	Date

/s/ VAN THUY TRAN		Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer)	~~October 5, 2018~~September 30, 2019
Van Thuy Tran		~~(Principal Executive Officer)~~

/s/ STEVE HANDY	Director	September 30, 2019
Steve Handy

/s/ LAIRD POWERS		Director	~~October 5, 2018~~September 30, 2019
Laird Powers