UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192021
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______________ to _______________

Commission file number 001-36563
ORION ENGINEERED CARBONS S.A.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Grand Duchy of Luxembourg00-0000000
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
4501 Magnolia Cove Drive Suite 106Houston,Texas77345
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)
(281) 318-2959
Registrant's telephone number, including area code

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Shares, no par valueOECNew York Stock Exchange


Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None

________________________none_________________________


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
    YesYes x No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
YesYes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.      Yes x    No  o 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has electronically submitted every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Yes  x   No  o 




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, "smaller reporting company" and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerxAccelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer  Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒                                                    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).     Yes ☐   No  x

The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates, based upon the closing price for the common shares, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, of $21.41,$18.99, was approximately $1.3$1.2 billion.

The registrant had outstanding 60,224,14760,656,076 shares of common stock as of February 19, 2020.

14, 2022.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant's definitive proxy statement for2022 Proxy Statement, in connection with the 2020 annual meetingCompany’s 2022 Annual Meeting of shareholders.



Shareholders (in Part III), as indicated herein.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg


Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page



oec-20211231_g1.jpg




CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS
In this annual report, unless otherwise specified or if the context so requires:

References in this report to “Orion,” the “Group,” the “Orion Group,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” are to Orion Engineered Carbons S.A.; a Luxembourg joint stock corporation (société anonyme); and its consolidated subsidiaries;S.A
References in this report to “Kinove Holdings” are to Kinove Luxembourg Holdings 1 S.à r.l., a Luxembourg limited liability company (société à responsabilité limitée), our previous principal shareholder which was owned by investment funds managed by affiliates of Rhône Capital L.L.C., investment funds managed directly or indirectly by Triton Managers III Limited and TFF III Limited and Luxinva S.A., a wholly-owned subsidiaryCautionary Statement for the Purposes of the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, a public institution wholly-owned by the Government“Safe Harbor” Provisions of the EmiratePrivate Securities Litigation Reform Act of Abu Dhabi;
References in this report to “Luxco Coinvest” are to Kinove Luxembourg Coinvestment S.C.A., a liquidated investment vehicle previously owned by members of the Company’s management;
References to the “Acquisition” are to the acquisition of the carbon black business line from Evonik Industries AG, completed on July 29, 2011; and
References to the “Credit Agreement” are to the Credit Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2014, among the Company, Orion Engineered Carbons Holdings GmbH, Orion Engineered Carbons Bondco GmbH, Orion Engineered Carbons GmbH, OEC Finance US LLC, the revolving borrowers named therein, the guarantors named on the signature page thereto, the lenders named therein, and Goldman Sachs Bank USA as administrative agent, as amended.
Reference to “Evonik” are to Evonik Industries AG, Germany, Evonik Degussa GmbH, Germany and any affiliated companies.

i




PRESENTATION OF CERTAIN FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION
The financial statements included in this report have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP” or “GAAP”).
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In this report, we present certain financial measures that are not recognized by GAAP and that may not be permitted to appear on the face of GAAP-compliant financial statements or notes thereto.
The non-GAAP financial measures used in this report are Contribution Margin, Contribution Margin per Metric Ton (collectively, “Contribution Margins”), Adjusted EBITDA, Net Working Capital and Capital Expenditures. We define Contribution Margin as revenue less variable costs (such as raw materials, packaging, utilities and distribution costs). We define Contribution Margin per Metric Ton as Contribution Margin divided by volume measured in metric tons. We define Adjusted EBITDA as operating result (EBIT) before depreciation and amortization, adjusted for acquisition related expenses, restructuring expenses, consulting fees related to Company strategy, share of profit or loss of joint venture and certain other items. Adjusted EBITDA is defined similarly in the Credit Agreement. Adjusted EBITDA is used by our management to evaluate our operating performance and make decisions regarding allocation of capital because it excludes the effects of items that have less bearing on the performance of our underlying core business. We define Net Working Capital as inventories plus current trade receivables minus trade payables. We define Capital Expenditures as cash paid for the acquisition of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment as shown in the consolidated financial statements.
We also use Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margin, which we define as Adjusted EBITDA for the relevant segment divided by the revenue for that segment.
We use Adjusted EBITDA, Contribution Margins and Net Working Capital, as well as Adjusted EBITDA by segment and Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margin, as internal measures of performance to benchmark and compare performance among our own operations. We use these measures, together with other measures of performance under GAAP, to compare the relative performance of operations in planning, budgeting and reviewing the performance of our business. We believe these measures are useful measures of financial performance in addition to consolidated net income for the period, income from operations (EBIT) and other profitability measures under GAAP because they facilitate operating performance comparisons from period to period and company to company and, with respect to Contribution Margin, eliminate volatility in feedstock prices. By eliminating potential differences in results of operations between periods or companies caused by factors such as depreciation and amortization methods, historic cost and age of assets, financing and capital structures and taxation positions or regimes, we believe that Adjusted EBITDA can provide a useful additional basis for comparing the current performance of the underlying operations being evaluated. For these reasons, we believe EBITDA-based measures are often used by the investment community as a means of comparison of companies in our industry. By deducting variable costs (such as raw materials, packaging, utilities and distribution costs) from revenue, we believe that Contribution Margins can provide a useful basis for comparing the current performance of the underlying operations being evaluated by indicating the portion of revenue that is not consumed by these variable costs and therefore contributes to the coverage of all costs and profits.
Different companies and analysts may calculate measures based on EBITDA, contribution margins and working capital differently, so making comparisons among companies on this basis should be done carefully. Adjusted EBITDA, Contribution Margins and Net Working Capital are not measures of performance under GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or construed as substitutes for revenue, consolidated net income for the period, income from operations (EBIT), gross profit and other GAAP measures as an indicator of our operations in accordance with GAAP.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The non-GAAP financial measures contained in this report are unaudited and have not been prepared in accordance with GAAP or the accounting standards of any other jurisdiction and may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. For a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures, see “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsReconciliation of non-GAAP Financial Measures.”
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS1995
This report contains and refers to certain forward-looking statements with respect to our financial condition, results of operations and business. These statements constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Forward-looking statements include, among others, statements concerning the potential exposure to market risks, statements expressing management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions and statements that are not limited to statements of historical or present facts or conditions.
Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as “anticipate,” “assume,” “assures”“assure,” “believe,” “confident,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “objectives,” “outlook,” “probably,” “project,” “will,” “seek,” “strong,“target,“target”
ii




“to“to be,” and other words of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements about the following matters: 
our strategies for (i) mitigating the impacts of the global outbreak of the Coronavirus, (ii) strengthening our position in specialty carbon blacks and rubber carbon blacks, (ii)(iii) increasing our rubber carbon black margins and (iii)(iv) strengthening the competitiveness of our operations;
the ability to pay dividends at currenthistorical dividend levels or at all;
cash flow projections;
the installation of pollution control technology in our United States (“U.S.”) manufacturing facilities pursuant to the EPA consent decree described herein;
the outcome of any in-progress, pending or possible litigation or regulatory proceedings; and
our expectation that the markets we serve will continue to grow.
All these forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions that, although believed to be reasonable, are inherently uncertain. Therefore, undue reliance should not be placed upon any forward-looking statements. There are important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others:
the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and results of operations;
negative or uncertain worldwide economic conditions;
volatility and cyclicality in the industries in which we operate;
operational risks inherent in chemicals manufacturing, including disruptions as a result ofdue to technical facilities, severe weather conditions andor natural disasters;
our dependence on major customers and suppliers;
our ability to compete in the industries and markets in which we operate;
our ability to address changes in the nature of future transportation and mobility concepts which may impact our customers and our businessbusiness;
our ability to develop new products and technologies successfully and the availability of substitutes for our products;
our ability to implement our business strategies;
volatility in the costs and availability of raw materials (including but not limited to any and all effects from restrictions imposed by the MARPOL convention and respective International Maritime Organization (IMO) regulations in particular to reduce sulfur oxides (SOx) emissions from ships) and energy;
our ability to respond to changes in feedstock prices and quality;
our ability to realize benefits from investments, joint ventures, acquisitions or alliances;
our ability to realize benefits from planned plant capacity expansions and site development projects and the potential delays to such expansions and projects;
information technology systems failures, network disruptions and breaches of data security;
our relationships with our workforce, including negotiations with labor unions, strikes and work stoppages;
our ability to recruit or retain key management and personnel;
our exposure to political or country risks inherent in doing business in some countries;
geopolitical events in the European Union and in particular(“EU”), relations amongst the ultimateEU member states as well as future relations between the European UnionEU and the United Kingdom resulting from the “Brexit” which may impact the Euro;other countries and organizations;
iii




environmental, health and safety regulations, including nanomaterial and greenhouse gas emissions regulations, and the related costs of maintaining compliance and addressing liabilities;
possible future investigations and enforcement actions by governmental, supranational agencies or supranational agencies;other organizations;
our operations as a company in the chemical sector, including the related risks of leaks, fires and toxic releases;
market and regulatory changes that may affect our ability to sell or otherwise benefit from co-generated energy;
litigation or legal proceedings, including product liability and environmental claims;
oec-20211231_g1.jpgi

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
our ability to protect our intellectual property rights and know-how;
our ability to generate the funds required to service our debt and finance our operations;
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange and interest rates;
the availability and efficiency of hedging;
changes in international and local economic conditions, including with regard to the Euro,dollar and the euro, dislocations in credit and capital markets and inflation or deflation;
potential impairments or write-offs of certain assets;
required increases in our pension fund contributions;
the adequacy of our insurance coverage;
changes in our jurisdictional earnings mix or in the tax laws or accepted interpretations of tax laws in those jurisdictions;
our indemnities to and from Evonik (as defined below);
challenges to our decisions and assumptions in assessing and complying with our tax obligations; and
potential difficulty in obtaining or enforcing judgments or bringing legal actions against usOrion Engineered Carbons S.A. (a Luxembourg incorporated entity) in the United States.U.S.
In lightIt is not possible for our management to predict all risk factors and uncertainties, nor can we assess the impact of these risks,all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results couldto differ materially from the forward-looking statementsthose contained in this report and no undue reliance should be placed on thoseany forward-looking statements. For further information regarding factors that could affect our business and financial results and the related forward-looking statements, see “Item 1A. Risk FactorsFactors..
iv
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
ii


Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
PART I
Item 1. Business
Overview
Orion Engineered Carbons S.A. (“Orion”, “Company”, “we”, and “our”, “OEC”) is a Luxembourg joint stock corporation (société anonyme or S.A.), incorporated on July 28, 2014 as a Luxembourg limited liability company (société à responsabilité limitée). Our registered office is located at 6, Route de Trèves, L-2633 Senningerberg (Municipality of Niederanven), Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Our principal executive office is located in Houston, Texas, U.S.
We are a leading global producermanufacturer of carbon black.black products. Carbon black is a powdered form of carbon that is used to improve certain propertiescreate the desired physical, electrical and optical qualities of materials into which it is added. It isvarious materials. Carbon black products are primarily used as a pigment and as a performance additive in coatings,additives for the production of polymers, printing inks and special applications (specialty carbon black)coatings (“Specialty Carbon Black” or “Specialties”) and in the reinforcement of rubber in tires and mechanical rubber goods (rubberpolymers (“Rubber Carbon Black” or “Rubber”). Our core competencies include the ability to engineer the physical properties of carbon black).
We areblack to meet the functional needs of our customers. The Company is one of the largest global producers of specialty and rubber carbon black.
We operate a global supply chain network comprised of 14 production sites (including a joint venture in Dortmund, Germany) in 10 countries. In addition to our headquarters in Luxembourg, we have our principal executive office in Houston, Texas (U.S.), as well as offices in Frankfurt (Germany), Cologne (Germany), Shanghai (China), Seoul (South Korea), Tokyo (Japan) and other locations. Our principal research and development (“R&D”) center is located in Cologne (Germany). We also have laboratories to support our customers in Carlstadt, New Jersey (U.S.), Shanghai (China) and Yeosu (South Korea).
We are a premium supplier of carbon black generating long-term benefits for stakeholders while remaining committed to responsible business practices with a focus on team culture, reliability, quality and oursustainability.
Our business is dividedorganized into two reportable segments: Specialty Carbon Black and Rubber Carbon Black. Our business segments are discussed in more detail later in this section.
Our internet address is www.orioncarbons.com. We operatemake available free of charge on or through our website, our Annual Reports in Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports in Form 10-Q, current reports in Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such material with, or furnishing it to, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Information appearing on our website is not a global supply chain network currently comprising 13wholly owned production facilitiespart of, and is not incorporated in Europe, North and South America, Asia and South Africa and threesales companies, as well as one jointly-owned production plantthis Annual Report in Germany.Form 10-K.
Products and Applications
We have
Specialty Carbon Black
Carbon black is manufactured in a diversifiedhighly controlled process to produce particles and aggregates of varied structure and surface chemistry, resulting in many different performance characteristics for a wide variety of applications.
The Company manufactures specialty carbon black for a broad range of specialized applications such as polymers, printing, batteries and coatings applications. The various production platform across the Specialty Carbon Black and Rubber Carbon Black operating segments. In 2019, we offered more than 280processes result in a wide range of different specialty carbon black grades with respect to their primary particle size, structure surface area and approximately 60 rubber carbonsurface chemistry. These parameters affect jetness, tinting strength, undertone, dispersibility, electrical conductivity and other characteristics. Carbon black grades under a numberis an additive that enhances the physical, electrical and optical properties of well-recognized brand names and trademarks. Our product portfolio is one of the broadest in the industry. Our product and geographic diversity exposes us to a wide variety of applications and industries, which in turn lowers our dependency on individual customers or regions. Our overall product portfolio benefits from higher margin specialty, certain technically superior grade rubber carbon black products (technical grade rubber black) and stable margin rubber carbon blackcustomer’s end products.
We continuously strive to meet our customers’ changing demands and adjust our products accordingly, as well as to enhance our product portfolio with innovations. In our Specialty Carbon Black segment, we have launched over the years several new post-treated specialty carbon black grades for coatings and printing applications, as well as several new high purity carbon black grades for the fiber industry and conductive carbon black grades for polymers, printingcoatings and new markets, such as for battery electrodes. In our Rubber Our specialty grades of carbon black are used to impart color, provide rheology control, enhance conductivity and static charge control, provide UV protection, enhance mechanical properties, and provide formulation flexibility through surface treatment. These specialty carbon products are used in a wide variety of applications, such as coatings, inks, plastics, adhesives, toners, and batteries.
a.Products
i.Carbon Black segment, we have developed in the past two product families: PUREX®for mechanical rubber goods (“MRG”) applications, which complies with high cleanliness requirements, and ECORAXCoatings® for tires, which is characterized by improved tire properties of wear and fuel consumption.
Specialty Carbon Black
Overview
We are one of the largest global producersoffer a broad range of specialty carbon black with an estimated share of global industry sales of approximately 24% in 2019 measured by volume in kmt. We manufacture specialty carbon black at multiple sitesproducts for a broad range of specialized applications. Specialty carbon black imparts specific characteristics, such as high-quality pigmentation, UV light protection, viscosity control and electrical conductivity.
In 2019, our Specialty Carbon Black segment generated $508.5 million in revenues, 251.0 kmt in volume, $122.2 million in Segment Adjusted EBITDA and Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margin of 24.0%. The Specialty Carbon Black segment has a product mix divided into four sectors: Coatings, Polymers, Printing and Special Applications. In 2019, Polymer applications accounted for about 69% of our volume measured in kmt, Printing accounted for nearly 15%, while Coatings, Special Applications and cross-sector sales to distributors represented the remainder.
Our Specialty Carbon Black segment generates higher margins per metric ton than our Rubber Carbon Black segment, with the highest margin per metric ton in Coatings. We believe the key driver of attractive margins in specialty carbon black is innovation supported by our innovation group, which works in close coordination with our customers and technical marketing support. We provide assistance to our customers through the whole value chain, including product formulation, technical support, product handling, packaging, logistics, supply chain management and final application.
We are recognized by our customers as a leading innovator and manufacturer of customized products fitting specific application needs. Our specialty carbon black customer base is relatively diverse, with the top five customers accounting for approximately 26% of the Specialty Carbon Black segment volume in 2019. We have been supplying most of our key industry customers for more than 30 years.
Coatings
Product and Application Portfolio
We have a broad Coatings product portfolio,coatings, which includes products used for pigmentation in black coatings and enhancement of various other coatings (for example, in(e.g., automotive basecoatsbase coats and architectural coatings), for conductivity and for tinting, in all other coatings, as well as for paints and for light tinting in transparent coatings (for example, for(e.g., metallic effects and wood glazing). The varietydiversity of our
1



manufacturing processes allows for the creation of a wide range of specialty carbon black grades with different morphologicalstructures and chemical properties, thereby giving some ofallowing our products to impart unique characteristics.characteristics to our customers’ products.
The following table provides examples of our Coatings applications.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg1

CoatingsAutomotiveGeneral IndustrialArchitectural & Decorative
ApplicationsAutomotive original
equipment manufacturing
Automotive refinish
Automotive parts
Wood, coil and plastic coatings
Protective and marine
Aerospace Packaging
Architectural
Decorative
AttributesPigmentation, high
jetness and blue
undertone, conductivity
High-performance tinting
Conductivity
Tinting
Brands
PRINTEX®
Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
NEROX®
LAMP BLACK
COLOUR BLACK
SPECIAL BLACK
PRINTEX®
NEROX®
LAMP BLACK
COLOUR BLACK
SPECIAL BLACK
PRINTEX®
NEROX®
LAMP BLACK
COLOUR BLACK
SPECIAL BLACK
Customers
We believe that the global Coatings industry consists of a few key suppliers that account for approximately half of the global Coatings capacity. Over time we have demonstrated to leverage our application technology platform to play a substantial role in our Coatings customer's product innovation process and to meet their demanding requirements. The customized nature of Coatings products leads to attractive margins in the industry.
We supply many of the Coatings industry’s key industry players and mid-sized customers and have longstanding relationships with several major global customers. We have been serving several of the key industry players for more than 30 years. The Coatings market is relatively fragmented, although our top five customers accounted for approximately 38% of Coatings volume in 2019.
Polymers
Product and Application Portfolio

ii.
Carbon Black for Polymers are the largest end-use market forWe offer a broad range of specialty carbon blacks. Our Polymerblack products for polymers that provide products to a diverse range of end markets including pipe (e.g., gas, oil, municipal water, sewage), construction, energy distribution (e.g., power cables), automotive, agriculture, and consumer packaging. Certain products within this portfolio is one of the broadest in the industry and, supported by an application technology platform, enables us to cover most of the product demand spectrum.

Our Polymers portfolio is tailored to meet specific industry and customer needs. For example, potable water pipes made of polyethylene, agricultural films, cables and other articles exposed toprovide UV radiation (sunlight) need to be protectedprotection against polymer degradation and subsequent deterioration of mechanical strength. We offer tailor-made products that not only provide efficient UV protection but also provide additional benefits,for material such as good processing propertiespipe used for potable water, injection molding, agriculture films and easy handling. Products offered also meet special performance criteria, including food-contact compliance and spin-fiber quality.

In addition to UV protection, our portfolio includescables. Other products from standard- toinclude standard-to high-performance grades designed and modified to provide electrical conductivity, antistatic and reinforcing properties to many different polymer articles, including high-voltage cables, films, boxes and high pressurehigh-pressure pipes.

iii.
Our portfolio offering targeted at fiber products and technology represents a growth area and provides a combination ofCarbon Black for PrintingWe offer a broad range of jetness with good spinnability. Certain of our polymerspecialty carbon black products have a bluish undertone, which makes these grades especially attractive for high-performance fibers in textiles, with luxury touch and feel. Ultra cleanprinting products that provide good process stability during the small and thin fiber manufacturing processes.

2



The following table provides examples of our polymers applications.
PolymersPipeWire & CableFilmsBlow &
Injection
Molding
FiberThermal
Insulation
Other
ApplicationsPressure pipes (water, gas) Irrigation Sewage pipes Conductive pipes/hosesPower cables (LV to HV) JacketingAgricultural Packaging Geomembrane Foil LaminationsPackaging Housing Container AutomotiveTextile Industrial Non-WovenConstructionThermosets TPE profiles Plastics
AttributesDispersibility UV protection ConductivityDispersibility UV protection ConductivityDispersibility UV protection ColoringDispersibility UV protection ConductivityDispersibility ColoringIR absorptionThixotrophy Dispersibility Coloring Reinforcing UV protection
Brands
PRINTEX® AROSPERSE HIBLACK®
PRINTEX® HIBLACK®
PRINTEX® AROSPERSE HIBLACK®
PRINTEX® AROSPERSE HIBLACK®
PRINTEX® AROSPERSE COLOUR BLACK
LAMP BLACK AROSPERSE
PRINTEX® AROSPERSE HIBLACK® LAMP BLACK
Customers
Due to the diverse nature of Polymer applications (construction, general industrial, engineering, consumer goods, automotive and packaging), the customer base for Polymers tends to be wide-ranging from regional and international master batch producers to global integrated petrochemical and polyolefin producers. We supply many of the plastics industry’s customers and supply leading customers in each region. We have been serving certain of our key customers for more than 30 years. Our top five customers accounted for approximately 34% of Polymers volume in 2019.
Printing
Product and Application Portfolio
We have a broad Printing product portfolio with a large number ofnumerous grades for different printing technologies and applications. We apply different process technologies to offer highly specialized products that meetmeeting specific requirements, including compliance with food-contact regulations and specially formulated products with different coloristic properties (suchthat require unique attributes such as color undertone, optical density and gloss), rheological effects and dispersibility functions.
We focus on Printing products with the highest potential for specialty applications, such as packaging and specialty niches. Consequently, relatively low-end newspaper and other print media applications represented only a small portion of our overall specialty carbon black sales in 2019. Producers must meet and balance numerous technical properties. These properties include ease of dispersion, processing, handling, formulation requirements, final product performance hold-out, rub resistance and, most importantly, coloristic properties, such as optical density, gloss, light-fastness and color tone. Our specialty carbon black product portfolio supports printing ink manufactures in achieving these attributes.
Packaging inks require special rheology, dispersion and wetting behavior properties. For example, UV curing inks on nonporous substrates require special surface chemistry for wetting, flow, color and stability.
3gloss.

iv.


Carbon Black for Batteries
The following table provides examples of our printing applications.
PackagingPrint Media
PrintingHigh-end
Packaging
PackagingDisplay
Advertising
Publication
(magazines)
Special
Applications
Books, Posters,
Brochures
Newspaper
ApplicationsLiquid inks
UV curing
Sheetfed
Screen
Liquid inksHeatset
Sheetfed
Screen
Heatset
Sheetfed
Publication
gravure
Screen
Water-
based
gravure UV
curing
Sheetfed
UV curing
Water-based
flexo Coldset
AttributesColoring
Gloss Food
contact
regulations
Wettability
ColoringColoring
Gloss
Moderate
flow
Wettability
Coloring
Gloss
Good flow
Low abrasion
Coloring
Gloss
Moderate
flow
Wettability
Coloring
Gloss
Moderate
flow
Wettability
Coloring
Brands
NEROX®
PRINTEX®
SPECIAL
BLACK
PRINTEX®
HIBLACK®
NEROX®
HIBLACK®
PRINTEX®
SPECIAL
BLACK
PRINTEX®
HIBLACK®
PRINTEX®
SPECIAL
BLACK
PRINTEX®
SPECIAL
BLACK
PRINTEX®
HIBLACK®
Customers
The global Printing industry has been undergoing consolidation over the past few years. Currently, the industry is dominated byWe also offer a few key players. Sourcing decisions are largely based on specialty carbon black product attributes. For low-end applications, decisions are made based primarily on price. For high-end applications, the required degreebroad range of product and technology know-how makes purchasing decisions less price sensitive. We play an important role in helping our customers develop customized Printing solutions and are recognized by customers as a preferred strategic and technical partner. We have been serving certain of our key customers for more than 30 years. Due to the relatively consolidated nature of the Printing industry, our top five Printing customers accounted for approximately 63% of Printing volume in 2019.
Special Applications
The Special Applications product category comprises applications not included into our Coatings, Polymers and Printing portfolios, such as, silicones, non-woven textile, building materials, battery electrodes metallurgical, agrochemicals and carbon brushes. Our top five customers accounted for approximately 37% of Special Applications volume in 2019.
Distribution
We sell most of our specialty carbon black products directlyfor wide range of energy storage applications such as lead-acid batteries, dry cells, supercapacitors and lithium-ion batteries. The products, which are manufactured in different production processes, function as tailor-made additives to our customers and only a smaller partprovide electrical conductivity to increase the performance of our sales is made via external channel partners and distributors. External channel partners and distributors generally sell our products in smaller lots to smaller customers, who do not negotiate with us directly. These sales are made across all our specialty carbon black applications, including Coatings, Polymers, Printing and Special Applications.batteries.
b.Competition
We are one of the largest global producers of specialty carbon black with an estimated share of global industry sales of approximately 24% measured by volume in kmt in 2019.black. Cabot Corporation and Birla Carbon are the other two large global producers of specialty carbon black. Each of the top three producers of specialty carbon black leverages R&D and applications technology platforms to tailor products to customer needs and to introduce its products into new application niches.
Rubber Carbon Black
Overview
We are one of the largest global producers of rubber carbon black. Rubber carbon black sales are largely regional, since transportation costs are high relative to sales price. In 2019, our largestOur rubber carbon black customer accounted for approximately 20%products are used in tires and the second largest customer for approximately 10% of ourmechanical rubber carbon black segment net sales with no other customer exceeding 10% of our segment net sales. The largest rubber carbon black customer (Michelin) accounted in addition for approximately 13% of the Company's overall consolidated net sales with no other customer exceeding 10% of our Company's net sales.
4



In 2019, our Rubber Carbon Black segment generated $967.9 million in revenues, 772.1 kmt in volume, $145.2 million in Segment Adjusted EBITDA and Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margin of 15.0%goods (“MRG”). Rubber carbon black is primarilyblacks are used for reinforcementto enhance the physical properties of the systems and applications in which they are incorporated. Rubber carbon blacks have traditionally been used in the tire industry as a rubber compoundsreinforcing agent to increase tread durability and are also used as a performance additive to adjust specific performances of rubber articles. Based on the application ofreduce rolling resistance and improve traction. In MRG, such as hoses, belts, extruded profiles and molded goods, rubber carbon black, we have dividedblacks are used to improve the Rubber physical performance of the product, including the product’s physical strength, fluid resistance, conductivity and resistivity.
a.Products
i.Carbon Black segment into two categories:for Tires and Mechanical Rubber Goods (MRG).
Tires
Product and Application Portfolio
We offer a broad Tire product portfolio,range of carbon black products for tires, which includes high reinforcing grades and semi-reinforcing grades. Fine particle reinforcing grade carbon blacks are used mostly in the tread of tires. Other reinforcing grade carbon blacks are also used in different components of the tire carcass. In addition to standardized grades, we produce advanced grades tailored to meet specific customer performance requirements, such as ECORAX®ECORAX® grades designed to lower rolling resistance and HPhigh-performance grades for truck tires and high- and ultra-high-performance passenger car tires. Semi-reinforcing grade carbon blacks are used in several components of the tire carcass like sidewall and bead area. We cover the full portfolio of standard semi-reinforcing grade carbon blacks and have a portfolio of special semi-reinforcing grade carbon blacks, which fulfill special customer requirements using special production technology. These special semi-reinforcing grade carbon blacks are part of our ECORAX® product family.
Customers
Given the highly consolidated nature of the tire industry, our top ten customers represented slightly more than 85% of our tires volume in 2019. A significant portion of our Tire products are sold to leading tire manufacturers. We have longstanding relationships with most of these customers and have the capacity to serve them in major global regions. We have been serving certain of our key customersii.Carbon Black for more than 30 years.
We believe that our customers value the quality, consistency and reliability of our operations and are generally reluctant to switch suppliers without due cause. In addition, because automotive tires have safety implications, tire manufacturers are often required to go through lab and extensive plant approval processes before they change their supplier of carbon black.
Mechanical Rubber Goods
Product and Application Portfolio
We produce a wide range of mechanical rubber goodscarbon black products for a variety of MRG end-uses, including automotive production, construction, manufacturing of wires and cables, as well as certain food, consumer and medical applications. Our MRG products can be divided into four main groups: (i) standardized ASTM furnace grades, (ii) specialized ASTM furnace grades, (iii) specialized non-ASTM furnace grades and rubber carbon blacks from special production processes lampblack (Durex O) and (iv) thermal black (N990) and gas black (CK3). In the field of special ASTM and non-ASTM blacks we offer an extensive portfolio of “PUREX®” grades. These grades are mainly used in automotive rubber parts like window sealings and hoses. These grades have an exceptionally high purity and high consistency and can be dispersedsatisfy special requirements needed for smooth surfaces and electrical resistance. These grades also disperse well in rubber compounds. The grades of the PUREX® family aiming at the adjustment of special requirementscompounds used in parts like smooth surface, special surface appearance of sealing systems, electrical resistancewindow seals, automotive hoses, transmission belts, damping elements and other specific requirements. The trend towards light weight construction of carselectrically conductive and the resulting use of aluminum require more attention to electrical resistivity of MRG parts.antistatic rubber goods.
5

b.


The following table presents examples of our mechanical rubber goods applications.
Mechanical Rubber GoodsTransportation
Construction
and Others
AutomotiveConductive & IsolationFood &
Medical
ApplicationsConveyor belts Construction profiles Mechanical rubber goodsExtruded and other profilesDamping elements Hoses Transmission beltsMolded goods with high resistanceSeals rubber- to-metal bonding Unvulcanized sheets and adhesivesElectrically conductive and antistatic rubber goodsProfiles Tubing Hoses Sealings
AttributesTensile strength Tear and abrasion resistance ReinforcementFiller loading Compression Smooth surfaces Processability ConsistencyProcessability Injection molding and calendaringLow hysteresis Reinforcement ProcessingScorch safety Tensile strengthElectrical conductivity or antistatic behaviorDispersion Filler loadings
Brands
CORAX®
PUREX® DUREX® CORAX® N990
CORAX® PUREX® DUREX®
PUREX®
CK 3
PRINTEX® CORAX® PUREX®
PUREX® CORAX® N990
Customers
We serve customers across the entire value chain and MRG applications, including compounders, parts and component manufacturers and automotive system suppliers. The mechanical rubber goods industry is fragmented in nature and supports a large number of suppliers. The industry, however, is undergoing a consolidation process. Our top ten global customers accounted for approximately 50% of our mechanical rubber goods volume in 2019. We have a diversified geographic presence with significant exposure to the European, North and South American and Asian MRG markets. We supply various key industry customers and have longstanding relationships with several of them. We have been serving certain key customers for more than 30 years.
Competition
We are one of the largestleading global producers of rubber carbon blacks. We compete with four companies that operate globally and numerous other companies that operate regionally, a number of which export product outside their region. The smaller regional suppliers mainly participate in standard and MRG applications and are less likely to provide specialized products used in higher end tire and MRG applications. Competition for our rubber carbon black products is generally based on product quality and performance, technical innovation, and customer service.

Drivers of Demand
Besides general global economic conditions, certain specific drivers of demand for carbon black differ among our operating segments. Specialty carbon black has a wide variety of end-uses, and demand is largely driven by the growth and development of the coatings, polymers, printing and batteries. Demand for specialty carbon black in the world while Cabot, Birlacoatings and Black Cat werepolymers industries is mainly influenced by the three largest global producerslevels of industrialization, automobile original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) demand, infrastructure development, consumer spending and construction activity. Demand for specialty carbon black in the printing industry is mainly influenced by developments in print media and packaging materials. Demand for specialty carbon black in the batteries industry is driven by electric vehicle penetration, growth of consumer and industrial batteries, and energy storage systems. Demand for rubber carbon black is largely driven by the growth and development of the automotive tire, commercial tire and MRG industries. Demand for rubber carbon black in 2019.tires is mainly influenced by the number of replacement and original equipment tires produced, which in turn is driven by (i) vehicle trends, including the number of vehicles produced and registered, and the number of miles driven, (ii) demand for high-performance tires, (iii) demand for larger vehicles,
Rubber carbon black sales are largely regional, since transportation costs are high relative to sales price. As a result, the global
oec-20211231_g1.jpg2

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
such as trucks and buses, (iv) consumer and industrial spending on new vehicles and (v) changes in regulatory requirements. Demand for rubber carbon black industryin MRG is more fragmented compared tomainly influenced by vehicle production and design trends, construction activity and general industrial production.
Demand in the specialtydeveloped Western European and North American regions is mainly driven by demographic changes, customers’ high-quality requirements, stringent tire regulation standards and relatively stable tire replacement demand. Demand in developing markets, such as China, Southeastern Asia, South America and Eastern Europe, is mainly driven by the growing middle class, rapid industrialization, infrastructure spending and increasing car ownership trends. The growth in vehicle production in turn drives demand for both original equipment tire manufacturing and replacement tires in developing regions.
Customer Contracts
Most of our long-term contracts contain formula-driven price adjustment mechanisms for changes in raw material and/or energy costs and in some instances, foreign exchange rates. We sell carbon black industry. The smaller regional suppliers participate mainlyunder the following two main categories of contracts based on price adjustment mechanisms:
Contracts with feedstock adjustments (indexed contracts)—This category includes contracts with monthly or, in standard tiresome cases, quarterly automatic feedstock and/or energy cost adjustments, which cover approximately 70% of our global volumes.
Non-indexed contracts—This category includes short-term contracts (usually shorter than three months) where sales prices of our carbon black products are not linked to carbon black oil market prices.
Many of our indexed contracts allow for periodic price adjustments, while a small portion (by volume sold) allow for quarterly price adjustments. These contracts have enabled us to reduce the impact of fluctuations in oil prices on our margins; however, rapid and mechanical rubber goods applicationssignificant oil price fluctuations have had and are less prevalentlikely to continue to have significant effects on our earnings and results of operations given (i) not all contracts contain price adjustment mechanisms and (ii) the value of our productivity improvements rises and falls with oil price movements.
See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business”—We are subject to volatility in more specialized products for the higher-end tirecosts, quality and mechanical rubber goods applications.availability of raw materials and energy, which could decrease our production volumes and margins and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Sales prices under non-indexed contracts are reviewed on a regular basis to reflect raw material and energy price fluctuations as well as overall market conditions.
ProcurementRaw Materials
Raw materials for our products are, in general, readily available and Raw Materials
In 2019, raw materials accounted for 75% of our cost of sales. Approximately 79% of the cost ofin adequate supply. The principal raw material used in the productionmanufacture of carbon black is related to petroleum-based or coal-based feedstock known as carbon black oil with some limited usecomprised of other raw materials, such as nitrogen tetroxide, hydrogen, natural gasresidual heavy oils derived from petroleum refining operations, the distillation of coal tars, and acetylene. Carbon black oil comes from three main sources: (i) fluid catalytic cracking bottoms, a by-product of fuel producing refineries, (ii) steam cracker tar, a by-productthe production of ethylene producing crackers, and (iii) certain coal tar products.
Efficient procurement of carbon black oil is an important factor in achieving optimal production costs and profitability. Our carbon black oil procurement strategy entails global sourcing of carbon black oil, using proprietary optimization tools to maximize value.
Approximately 50%throughout the world. Majority of our carbon black oil supply is covered by short-short and long-term contracts with a wide variety of suppliers.
The pricing Natural gas is also used in the production of carbon black. These raw material costs generally are influenced by the availability of various types of carbon black oil is typically indexed to the price of fuel oil. In general, we benchmark against Platts indices in the sourcing regions e.g. USGC, New York, Rotterdamfeedstock and Singapore. In some areas the Gasoil index is used. While the majority of our purchases are based on underlying fuel oil indices, the ultimate carbon black oil price also depends on carbon black oil specific quality characteristics, differentials (premiums or discounts to Platts indices), freight costs and region-specificnatural gas, supply and demand as well as regulatory factors. Carbon black oil procurement is an important factorof such raw materials and related transportation costs. Changes in achieving best-in-class production costs.our raw material supplier’s operating conditions and demand for their products could reduce the availability of certain very specialized feedstocks.

6



Characteristics of Production Capability
Production Know-how
With exception of our plant in France, we produce rubber carbon black at all, and specialty carbon blacks at many, of our production sites. We have the production know-how to manufacture a wide range of specialty carbon blacks and rubber carbon blacks worldwide. We believe we are currently the only supplier with core production competencies across all leading production processes (furnace black, gas black, lamp black, thermal black and acetylene black). This provides us flexibility to offer a wide range of specialty carbon black and rubber carbon black products that are best suited to customers’ needs.
Location of Production FacilitiesSeasonality
Our production sitesbusiness is generally not seasonal in nature, although our results of operations are strategically located throughoutgenerally weaker in the world in all major regions. This is important for our rubber carbon black business, which is largely regional. Since specialty carbon black’s freight costs representlast three months of a smaller component of the final cost (relative to rubber carbon black), it is commercially viable to ship specialty carbon blacks across geographic regions from our key production sites in Germany, South Korea, China and the United States. The regional spread of our production network also offers access to high-growth regions globally.
Flexibility of Asset Base
We have implemented a flexible and intelligent production and supply chain network under the concept of operating all regional production sites as one large virtual plant. This allows us to shift production of specialty carbon black and rubber carbon black among different plants in order to optimize costs and plant utilization. In most cases, more than one plant is approved by our customers for specific products, which not only increases production flexibility but also ensures a higher supply security for customers.calendar year.
Innovation
We enjoy a long-standing reputation within the industry for carbon black product and process technology, applications knowledge, and innovation. Carbon black products are highly versatile and meet specific performance requirements across many industries. This creates significant opportunities for product and process innovation. The final propertiesFurther product innovations are a key competitive factor in the industry, even after decades of the carbon black product depend on the mixture of raw materials used and to a large extent on the configuration and operating conditions of the specific reactor and the further processing of the initial productR&D in beading, drying and after-treatment steps. Minimal changes to just one of the many process parameters can result in completely different carbon black products with different properties and potential end uses.this field.
We maintain multiple product applications and process development centers in Europe, Asia and the Americas. Our innovation groupInnovation Group is divided into applications technology and process development teams.teams, which cover both Specialty Carbon Black and Rubber Carbon Black. The applications technology team works closely with our major clients to develop innovative products and expand the applications range for carbon black products. Success in applications development deepens our understanding of customer and industry requirements gained through these interactions. The process development team works closely with our manufacturing and procurement teams to enhance company competitiveness. This team focuses on efforts that lead to improvedimprove production processes, improved product quality and improved cost structure.
Our Innovation function’s leading competence center of excellence is located in Cologne (Germany) to support and enhance our global innovation groupInnovation (research and development or “R&D”) function activities. This center includes carbon black technologists, applications technology laboratories and process development staff, co-located with our pilot process development facilities. Staffing in our Cologne technical center includes physicists, chemists and engineers who can effectively and efficiently collaborate to create and analyze various carbon black properties with a goal to
oec-20211231_g1.jpg3

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
develop new products to meet customer requirements. Common processes and information technology tools further enhance coordination and communication with our regional technical centers located in China, South Korea China and the United States.U.S.
Applications Technology
Technology—Our goal is to remain at the forefront of the industry in terms of product development by having dedicated applications technology facilities. Success relies on close collaboration with customers, often through long-term R&D alliances, which create superior technical interfaces. These interactions enable us to develop tailored solutions and meet unique customer requirements.

Our applications technology teams bringteam brings together a deep knowledge of carbon black technology with an understanding of the key applications practiced by our customers. This team has access to extensive laboratory and testing facilities using similar formulations, processing and test methods employed by our customers.

Customer collaborations often include cooperative testing with customers’ staff in our facilities. Applications technology provides a key customer and market interface and translates specific customer needs into carbon black product attributes.
Applications technology plays a supporting role in the process of new product launchlaunches by providing technical data and presentations, training and support, and establishmentestablishing and monitoring of quality targets. The application technologyThis team works closely with customers to provide support during the qualification cycle, which can be long and may last over one year. This close cooperation decreases the likelihood of customers switching suppliers once a product has been approved.
7



Process Development
We believe our process development capabilities represent a key competitive advantage. Product customization relies upon extensive process capabilities. Unique productsquality test methods and products thatapplications testing are difficult to replicate add value to customers’ end-products. Our customers have come to rely upon a continuous improvement in product quality and performance. Process development also enables improvements in manufacturing costs and efficiencies.
Our innovation group also operates pilot plants (small scale production facilities used for real-world trials of new carbon black grades) and a family of mini plants which include a smaller furnace reactor for basic studies as well as various facilities for chemical after-treatment, granulation and drying to tailor new products to specific customer requirements, especially indefined within the specialty carbon black area
Spending on innovation, including both applications technology team. Methods are developed centrally and process development, amounteddeployed worldwide to $19.9 million in 2019, $20.3 million in 2018 and $18.2 million in 2017 and was mostly directed towards the development of new specialty carbon black products, new applications for carbon black products and the improvement of process efficiencies as well as reduction of emission levels.
Marketing, Sales and Customer Contracts
We have an integrated sales and marketing process that combines key management, regional sales and technical marketingrelevant production and applications support. This allows uslaboratories to focus on customer solutions tailored to particular industries or regions.assure consistency in measurements and reporting.
Sales
Our Sales department is organized into two main groups: Key Account Management and Regional Sales. The Key Account Management team deals with the largest customers and has dedicated sales people by global account. The Regional sales team covers all other customers located in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, in the Americas and in Asia-Pacific. The field sales force operates along geographical regions. In addition to selling carbon black directly, we work with third-party distributors serving our markets with all required smaller volume lots.
Contracts
Most of our long-term contracts contain formula-driven price adjustment mechanisms for changes in raw material and/or energy costs and in some, foreign exchange rates. We sell carbon black under the following two main categories of contracts based on price adjustment mechanisms:
Contracts with feedstock adjustments (indexed contracts).Intellectual Property— This category includes contracts with monthly or, in some cases, quarterly automatic feedstock and/or energy costs adjustments, which cover approximately 75% of our global volumes.
Non-indexed contracts. This category includes short-term contracts (usually shorter than three months) where sales prices of our carbon black products are not linked to carbon black oil market prices.
Many of our indexed contracts allow for monthly price adjustments, while a small portion (by volume sold) allow for quarterly price adjustments. We believe that these contracts have enabled us generally to maintain our Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margins; however, rapid and significant oil or energy price fluctuations have had and are likely to continue to have significant and varying effects on our earnings and results of operations, partly because oil price changes affect our sales prices and our cost of raw materials and energy at different times and amounts, and partly due to other factors, such as differentials affecting the ultimate carbon black oil prices paid by us (versus a particular reference price index), actual carbon black oil usage amounts and our ongoing efficiency initiatives. See “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations—Raw Material and Energy Costs” as well as “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—We are subject to volatility in the costs and availability of raw materials and energy, which could decrease our margins and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.” Sales prices under non-indexed contracts are reviewed on a regular basis to reflect raw material and energy price fluctuations as well as overall market conditions.
Outbound Logistics and Distribution
Our outbound logistics and distribution function has critical importance given the high cost involved in the transportation of carbon black, in particular rubber carbon black. Each of our plants has different logistics demands based on the products manufactured and the region’s export requirements. Unlike rubber carbon blacks, which are mostly sold regionally, specialty carbon blacks are sold globally, since freight costs typically represent a smaller component of the final price. Europe, North America and South Korea, which export high volumes of specialty carbon black, have complex and demanding logistics requirements. Other regions, such as South Africa and Brazil, are relatively self-contained with the vast majority of production sold within the respective countries.
The primary method of the carbon black transportation to customers is by truck and rail. The majority of the regions use primarily trucks, with the exception of the United States, where rail transport accounts for approximately half of transportation modes. We lease the majority of our rail cars and have a variety of third-party agreements with railroad companies for the management of vehicles.
8



Intellectual Property
We consider intellectual property development and management as a source of strategic competitive advantage. We initiate and maintain patents and trademarks, with varying expiration dates, on a number of our products and processes. However,We sell our products under a variety of patents and trademarks we often do not patent a production method or product to avoid disclosure of business specific know-how. We proactively make careful assessments with respect to production process improvementsown and decide whether to apply for patents or retain and protect these improvements as trade secrets. When we file a patent application, it is usually filed in the relevant countries with active competition and markets for our products. In addition to patents, a significant part of our intellectual property is our trade secrets, general know-how and experience regarding the manufacturing technology, plant operation and quality management.
We rely on intellectual property laws, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisionstake reasonable measures to protect our intellectual property rights. We regard our patents, trade secrets and other intellectual property as valuable assets and take action when we deem it necessary to protect them. We proactively monitor competing patents and patent applications to ensure that we do not infringe the rights of other industry participants and/or challenge patent applications that may be without merit and would inhibit our ability to utilize our technology.
In connection with the separation of our business from Evonik Industries AG, Germany (“Evonik”), Evonik assigned to us its intellectual property that was exclusively used in its carbon black business, as well as certain intellectual property rights that are still in use in its retained business. However, we may be restricted in leveraging our intellectual property that we use on the basis of a license from Evonik or the intellectual property that is subject to grant-back license to expand our business into fields outside of carbon black. For additional information, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Legal and Regulatory Risks—We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights successfully and we are still subject to restrictions and risks associated with our intellectual property sharing arrangements with Evonik.successfully.
HumanCapital
We are a group of people who share one common passion: carbon black. Our success depends on attracting, recruiting, training, and developing a diverse, talented global workforce. We are committed to providing our employees with equal opportunities for learning and personal growth in an environment where their voices can be heard and creativity and innovation are encouraged. To this end, our aspiration is to be the employer of choice in our industry.
Aligning employee engagement and enablement is integral to the continued success of Orion. We have built a value system around a foundation of appreciating our employees through trust, respect and development. To ensure our employees are both motivated to do their work and are equipped with the right tools and training to be successful, we start with listening. We use employee surveys and listening sessions to help ensure all the voices of our employees are heard. We used the feedback from our employee surveys and listening sessions to prioritize our human capital strategy and make investments in a new learning platform and performance management system. Further, we have upgraded our talent management and development programs, focusing on specific actions to improve attraction, engagement, learning and development, and retention.
Orion is made up of over 1,475 employees with plants, laboratories and offices in 23 locations across 13 countries in all 3 regions (Americas, Asia/Pacific (“APAC”) and Europe/Middle East/Africa (“EMEA”)). Inspiring the entire Orion workforce to function as one team is critical to our success. We believe this is possible when we accept and value each individual for who they are. Indeed, valuing people is one of Orion’s core values which define who we are and the expectation we have of Orion colleagues in our interactions with other employees, customers, suppliers and within the communities where we operate. Building on this foundation, we value our people irrespective of their nationality, race, gender, citizenship status, ethnic origin, sexual orientation, gender identification, religion or philosophy, disability and age, among others; and we strive to put this into practice when hiring, developing and retaining talents.
A focus on promoting from within has led to continued increases in internal fill rates and the involvement of business leaders across the organization in talent reviews to assess employees on performance and future potential. These talent reviews continue to uncover talent gaps, identify high potential employees, build bench strength, increase retention, and help us identify our future leaders and innovators.
We uphold the freedom of association and fully recognize the right of collective bargaining. Certain of our employees worldwide are represented through unions and works councils. We value exchanging information and views with the local unions and works councils with the view to finding solutions to our common issues and ensuring success for both our employees and the company.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg4

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
LaborRelations
Our employees are represented by labor unions, industry groups and works councils in accordance with local law and practices. Membership in employee labor unions varies in accordance with the business area, local practice and country. We have entered into collective bargaining agreements with employee labor unions either directly or as members of industry-wide unions or employer organizations. Approximately 73% of our employees are covered by such agreements. These agreements typically govern, among other things, terms and conditions of employment and reflect the prevailing practices in each country. We believe we have stable relations with our employees and voluntary turnover is low.
In 2017, 35 of the former employees in our closed facility in Ambès, France filed claims with the labor court of Bordeaux contesting the termination of their employment and seeking damages. Of these claims 31 are pending in the courts and our results of operations reflect accruals made by us to satisfy our best estimate of these claims should the former employees prevail.
Environmental, Health and Safety Matters
Protection of humanspeople and the environment, fair treatment of our partners and a clear alignment to theour customers’ needs of customers are the essential components of our activities. Therefore, weWe strive not only to comply with all applicable laws and voluntary obligations, but strive to continuously improve our performance and management systems. Our integrated global management system with established standards and processes is based on the principles of the Responsible Care, ISOInternational Organization for Standardization’s (“ISO”) 9001 Quality Management System, ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems, and OSHAS 18001ISO 45001 Safety Management Systems. All of our operating sites with the exception of our facility in France are third-party certified byto ISO 14001 and ISO 9001.9001 standards. Our facility in France is ISO 9001 certified and we plan to get ISO 14001 third party certified in 2022. The global management system outlines our processes and procedures practiced in relation to environmental protection, occupational and process safety, health protection and quality management includingas well as sustainable compliance, social accountability and product stewardship. In 2019, OEC published its firstOur sustainability report in which the main environmental, health and safety performance data are reported according the Global Reporting Initiative protocols. The report is posted to the Sustainability portion ofaccessible on our webpage: www.orioncarbons.com.
Our operations involve the use, processing, handling, storage and transportation of materials that are subject to numerous supranational, national and local environmental and safety laws and regulations. Our production facilities require operating permits that are subject to renewal or modification. We could incur significant costs, including fines, penalties and other sanctions, third-party claims and environmental cleanup costs, as a result of violations of or liabilities under environmental, health and safety laws and regulations or operational permits required thereunder. We believe that our operations are currently in substantial compliance with all applicable environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. Although our management systems and practices are designed to ensure compliance with laws and regulations, future developments and increasingly stringent regulation could require us to make additional unforeseen environmental, health and safety expenditures. See as well risks described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Legal and Regulatory Risks—Our operations are subject to environmental, health and safety regulations. We have been and may in the future be subject to investigations by regulatory authorities in respect of alleged violations and may incur significant costs to maintain compliance with, and to address liabilities under, these laws and regulations.
Environmental
EnvironmentalAir Quality—
Air Quality
One of the main environmental challenges of a carbon black plant is the management of exhaust gas from production processes. This exhaust gas contains a number of regulated pollutants, including carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and sulfur compounds. The most common method for controlling these gases is through combustion, which produces useable energy as a by-product. Currently, eight manufacturing sites, including one jointly owned production facility, have the capability to beneficially utilize these gases through some form of energy co-generation, such as the sale or reuse of steam, gas or electricity. In addition, we are evaluating initiatives to build additional co-generation facilities.
The primary air pollutants of concern include sulfur dioxide (SO2(“SO2”), nitrogen oxides (NOx)(“NOx”) and particulates. In order to maintain compliance with emission requirements in certain jurisdictions, we utilize various desulfurization and de-NOx processes in some of our plants.processes. We control the particulate matter by using our bag filter technology.
With regard to air qualityIn the European Union, we are subject to emission control provisions at the national as well as at the EU level. The EU Directive No. 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (“IED Directive”) entered into force on January 6, 2011. It provides for regulation on the prevention and control of, which regulates pollution from industrial activities and includes rules aiming to reduce emissions into air, water, and land and to prevent the generation of waste. Starting January 2013, the EU member states hadIn addition to comply with emissions limits for certain industries.
9



Moreover, the IED Directive amended the former EU Directive 2008/1/EC on integrated pollution prevention and control (“IPPC Directive”) by defining best available techniques as binding industry standards. The Best Available Techniques Reference (BREF Notes) document applied to the carbon black industry was developed and implemented in August 2007 and it is subject its revision beginning at the end of 2020 or in 2021 by the European Commission.
Germany, for example, implemented the IED Directive by amendments to certain German statutes (among other things, the Federal Emissions Control Act (Bundes-Immissionsschutzgesetz), the Federal Water Act (Wasserhaushaltsgesetz) and the Act on Recycling (Kreislaufwirtschaftsgesetz). With respect to new emissions thresholds and new binding industry standards, permits need to comply with these standards and will, in general, not be grandfathered.
Besides the IED Directive and its implementation, European jurisdictions in which we operate may provide for further regulations regarding emission reduction and safety technology standards that apply to our facilities (for example, the German Emissions Control Act). Therefore, under such regulations we would haveThe EU Commission is currently doing a revision of EU measures addressing pollution from large industrial installations, as announced in the European Green Deal. The aims of the revision are to modernize our facilities regularlyprogress towards the EU’s zero pollution ambition for a toxic-free environment and to meetsupport climate, energy and circular economy policies. This includes the required standards.revision of the IEC Directive.
In the United States,U.S., we are subject to emissions limitations under the federal Clean Air Act (“CAA”) and a consent decree entered into with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) as described in more detail below under “—Environmental Proceedings”, as well as analogous state and local laws, which regulate the emission of air pollutants from our facilities and impose significant monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements. In addition, these laws and regulations require us to obtain pre-approval for the construction or modification of facilities expected to produce or significantly increase air emissions and to obtain and comply with air permits that include stringent conditions on air emissions and operations. In certain cases, we may need to incur capital and operating expenditures for specific equipment or technologies to control emissions. All our U.S. facilities are required to obtain federal “Title V” permits, which are required for stationary sources classified as “major” on the basis of their emissions. Obtaining permits and approvals required for the construction, modification and operation of our facilities, or the appeal of such permits and approvals once they are issued, has the potential to delay the development of our projects. We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, substantial administrative and capital expenditures to maintain compliance with CAA requirements that have been promulgated or may be promulgated or revised in the future.requirements.
Pursuant to the CAA, the EPA has developed industry-specific National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (“NESHAPs”) for stationary sources classified as “major” on the basis of their hazardous air pollutant emissions.emissions under which we are required to comply with Maximum Achievable Control Technology (“MACT”) standards. Our U.S. facilities are subject to NESHAPsMACT standards applicable to
oec-20211231_g1.jpg5

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
carbon black facilities, as well as NESHAPsMACT standards applicable to industrial boilers. The NESHAPs establish emissions reductionEPA is promulgating carbon black MACT which will impose operating requirements for our U.S. Plants. The U.S. plants are generally compliant already and require usewe will start a program of control technologyverifying that we meet these new requirements that meet a minimum standard and which may entail a combination of technology, processes, and techniques. These requirements are imposed through our Title V permits, and require specific monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements. See “—Environmental Proceedings” for information regarding our compliancein 2022 with the CAA.aim of being fully compliant based on the EPA’s schedule.
In China a reduction of NOx emission limits for a boiler from 300 parts per million (“ppm”)and South Korea, our operations have been subject to 200 ppm and dust from 30 micro gram per cubic meter (“mg/m3”) to 20 mg/m3 was required following a changeincreasingly strict air quality regulations in China's Air Pollution Prevention law in October 2017. In addition, Chinese government reduced SO2 limits for the boiler from 200 ppm to 50 ppm effective from 2018.
Further reduction of NOx emissions from 200 to 100 ppm and dust from 20mg/m3 to 10mg/m3 became effective in 2019. With effect from calendar year 2020 SO2 emission limits for a dryer will be reduced from 200 ppm to 50 ppm.
In Korea, the Clean Air Conservation Act changed, leading to reduced air emission limits for carbon black manufacturing processes for SO2 from 400 ppm to 200 ppm, and in the energy generation processes for SO2 from 300 ppm to 200 ppm, for NOx from 200 ppm to 150 ppm and dust from 50ppm to 30 ppm and the energy processes NOx is to be reduced from 220 ppm to 180 ppm and dust from 35 ppm to 20 ppm on condition of 6% oxygen concentration. These changes will become effective in calendar year 2020.
recent years. These regulation changes in China and South Korea in priorrecent years have been complied with and thosewith. Those to come may require additional capital and operating expenditures for specific equipment or technologies to control emissions, and we have projects underway to address the new requirements.
Greenhouse Gas Regulation and Emissions Trading
Trading—Our facilities also emit significant volumes of CO2. In the European Union, all of our production facilities (except for our manufacturing site in France) are subject to the European Emission Trading SchemeSystem (“ETS”) for CO2 emissions. The ETS was set up in 2003 by the Directive 2003/87/EC in order to considerably reduce the output of greenhouse gas (“GHG”). The directive has been implemented into German law as the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Act (Treibhausgas-Emissionshandelsgesetz). Industrial sites to which the ETS applies receive a certain numbervolume of allowances in metric tons to emit GHGsgreenhouse gasses (“GHGs”) and must surrender one allowanceallowances in equivalent volume for each metric ton of GHGgreenhouse gas (“GHG”) emitted. For the trading period that commenced in 2013, the ETS has been revised such that the EU-wide quantity of emission allowances allocated each year have been significantly reduced as compared to the average annual total quantity of allowances issued in the EU between 2008 and 2012 and no free-of-charge allocation for any electricity producing entity exists anymore.
The ETS affects carbon black manufacturers in the European Union. Carbon black production is currently listed on the carbon leakage list, which allows receiving the significant share of needed emission allowances free of charge. This list was reviewed byFrom January 1, 2021, the European Commission and Carbon Black remained onEU ETS has stepped into its Phase 4 period running until 2030. However, as part of the Carbon Leakage List forEU Green Deal the ETS Phase IV (2021-2030). See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Legal and Regulatory Risks—Regulations requiringEU has adopted a climate law enshrining its new climate targets of at least a 55% reduction ofin greenhouse gas emissions could adversely affect our business,
10



financial condition, results of operationsby 2030 compared to 1990 levels and cash flows.net zero by 2050. The preparation for the ETS Phase IV (2021-2030) started in 2017 by the European Commission the European Council and the European Parliament in cooperation, Council and Parliament announced during 2018 the implementation timetable with regard to ETS Phase IV. Aspublished its first part of International Carbon Black Association's (“ICBA”) joint activity towards ETS, OEC completed the emission data collection“Fit for the period 2014-2018 according55” package in July 2021 to the relevant European Union regulations. This data collection contributed to help developing an industrial benchmark of emission data. These data will provide the basis for expected discussions and exchanges between environmental agencies acrossenable the EU to bemeet those targets. The actual EU ETS is expected to take placebe subject to regular reviews and possible changes in order to ensure the middle of 2020way to complete the emission allocation process for ETS Phase IV.achieve those climate reduction targets.
The design concept of the South Korean ETS is similar to the European EU ETS. Currently, weWe may need to purchase emission rights for an insignificant amount in South Korea to cover our excess requirements.the shortfall where emissions exceed the quantity of free allowances, incurring additional costs.
In the U.S., comprehensive climate change legislation has not yet been adopted. After determining that emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and certain other gases endanger public health and the environment in December 2009,United States, the EPA has regulatedregulates GHG emissions under various provisions of the Clean Air Act. The EPAAct, and has adopted rules that require reporting of GHG emissions by owners and operators of facilities in certain source categories, or that exceed certain GHG emissions thresholds, andwhich include our facilities are subject to this rule. Further, EPA issued the GHG “Tailoring Rule” in May 2010, to address GHG permitting requirements pursuant to its determination that GHG emissions triggered permitting requirements for stationary sources starting in January 2011, and has since continued efforts to regulate GHG emissions.
Apart from the EPA’s efforts, Congress has from time to time considered legislation to reduce emissions of GHGs, but no legislation has been enacted to date.facilities. At the state level, approximately one-half of thesome states have already taken legal measures to reduce emissions of GHGs, primarily through the planned development of GHG emission inventories and/or regional GHG cap-and-trade programs. ThereCurrently none of our plants are located in states that implemented GHG cap-and-trade programs, but there is no assurance that the current level of regulation will continue at the federal or state level in the future, or that future changes would not materially affect our operations or require material capital expenditures. The adoption of legislation or regulations that require reporting of GHGs, establish permitting thresholds based on GHG emissions or otherwise limit or impose compliance obligations for emissions of GHGs from our equipment and operations could require us to incur costs to obtain and comply with permits, reduce emissions of GHGs associated with our operations or purchase carbon offsets or allowances.
South African Carbon Offsets Law came into effect from June 1, 2019. The carbon black process is listed on Table 3 of this bill and a process emission factor was determined for a ton of carbon black produced using furnace black technology. The current amount of tax is determined to be 120 ZAR per ton of CO2 emitted into the atmosphere. Our facility in Port Elizabeth is subject to pay the tax for its emissions calculated from June 1, 2019 and on yearly basis thereafter. Based on current production levels the total annual tax is expected to be not material and not to exceed $0.2 million per fiscal year.
There are also ongoing discussions and regulatory initiatives in other countries in which we have facilities, including Brazil, regarding GHG emission reduction programs, but those programs have not yet been defined.programs. For instance, South Africa has adopted CO2 tax regime.
Water Quality
Quality—Our plants are net consumers of water and are generally subject to laws and regulations related to water management. Most of our plants recycle a substantial amount of the water used in the manufacturing process, which is used as “quench water” in the cooling process. Water discharge from most plants consists primarily of storm-water during and after heavy rain, as well as limited wastewater from ancillary operations such as boiler blowdown and equipment washing; these discharges only take place under permitted conditions. For those plants that discharge water, the treatment generally is a settling pond system. Some facilities operate more advanced wastewater treatment systems, such as filtration and aeration systems incorporating chlorination or ozonation, depending on local requirements.
At the EU level, the European Directive No. 2000/60/EC, also known as the Water Framework Directive (“WTD”), aimed to achieve a good qualitative and quantitative status of all water bodies by 2015. Its main goals include expanding the scope of water protection to all waters, including surface waters and groundwater, water management based on river basins, a “combined approach” of emission limit values and quality standards and streamlining legislation. A lot of effort has been put into the preparation and drafting of the River Basin Management Plans by 2009. The Plans should have identified all actions to be taken in the river basin district to deliver the objectives of the WFD. An interim Commission’s Assessment with respect to the status of water conditions in the EU, and activities influencing it, is attesting best water qualities ever since. However, the assessment shows that a more determined effort is needed to ensure achievement of WFD objectives in the enacted 6-year cycles ending in 2021 and 2027.
Moreover, the use of water for the manufacturing process may require permits or licenses as, for example, under the German Federal Water Act or German local laws. Permits may also be required for the discharge of wastewater into the public sewer system. Such permit or license may be revoked without compensation under certain circumstances.
In the United States, our facilities are subject to the federal Clean Water Act (“CWA”), and analogous state laws and regulations that impose restrictions on the discharge of pollutants into waters of the United States. Any such discharge of pollutants must be in accordance with the terms of the permit issued by EPA or the analogous state agency. In addition, the CWA and implementing state laws and regulations require individual permits or coverage under general permits for discharges of storm water runoff from certain types of facilities. Federal and state regulatory agencies can impose administrative, civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance with discharge permits or other requirements of the CWA and analogous state laws and regulations. These permits generally have a term of five years. Our
11

Contamination—


facilities are subject to CWA permitting requirements, and must obtain and comply with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits, which establish standards for, and require monitoring of, our discharges. We are subject to categorical pretreatment standards for the Carbon Black Manufacturing Point Source category, which, among other requirements, prohibits discharges of process wastewater pollutants to navigable water.
Contamination
As we handle chemicals that could cause water or soil contamination, we may be subject to remediation obligations under national law. Additionally, third parties may be able to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the release of hazardous substances or other pollutants into the environment.
In particular, the German Federal Act on Soil Protection (Bundes-Bodenschutzgesetz) requires the prevention of soil contamination by taking adequate precautions. In case of discovery of any contamination or past pollution (Altlasten) the owner, the current controlling person of the property, the polluter, its universal successor (Gesamtrechtsnachfolger) or the previous owner (if such owner transferred title to the real property after March 1, 1999 and knew or should have known of the contamination or past pollution) may be held responsible for remediation measures. Responsibility may be placed on either or several of the persons even in the absence of any fault or negligence. The competent authorities may also take remediation measures themselves and require the responsible party to bear the costs of such remediation. If several parties are responsible, they are jointly or severally liable and each party has the legal claim to reimbursement against the other parties. Such reimbursement may be contractually modified or waived among the parties.
In case of contamination of ground or surface water, the responsibility for remediation measures results from the Federal Act on Soil Protection in conjunction with the Federal Water Act and local water protection laws.
In the United States, our facilities are subject to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) and similar state laws. CERCLA establishes liability for parties, including current and former site owners and operators, generators, and transporters, in connection with releases of hazardous substances. Under CERCLA, we may be subject to liability without regard to fault or the lawfulness of the disposal or other activity. Our operations involve the storage, handling, transportation and disposal of hazardous substances within the meaning of CERCLA. As a result, we may be jointly and severally liable under CERCLA for all or part of the costs required to clean up sites at which hazardous substances have been released into the environment. Under CERCLA and similar state laws, we could be required to remove previously disposed substances and wastes, remediate contaminated property and groundwater, conduct natural resource damage assessments and pay compensation and penalties. RCRA is the principal federal statute regulating the generation, treatment, storage and disposal of hazardous and other wastes. RCRA and state hazardous waste regulations impose detailed operating, inspection, training and response standards and requirements for permitting, closure, remediation, financial responsibility, record keeping and reporting. Our sites have areas currently and formerly used as landfills for wastes generated by our operations. These landfills may bethat are subject to regulation under RCRA, and certain of our facilities have been investigated and remediated under RCRA. These laws and regulations may also expose us to liability for acts that were in compliance with applicable laws at the time we performed those acts. We could incur significant costs in connection with investigation and remediation activities or claims asserted at current or former facilities or third-party sites.
Non-hazardous and Hazardous Waste
Waste—In some jurisdictions in which we operate we are subject to provisions regarding waste management and the handling and storage of hazardous substances. Those provisions may require documentation on the disposal of waste or compliance with certain safety standards (for example, as set forth in Council Directive 96/82/EC on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, known as Seveso II Directive). The directive was implemented into German law by the 12th Ordinance under the German Emissions Control Act.
We generate both hazardous waste in the form of spent solventsand non-hazardous wastes at our plant labs. In addition, coal tar fractions, a common raw materialfacilities that we manage in accordance with applicable regulations. Waste streams generated at some plants, are considered hazardous waste if spilled or otherwise require disposal, as are certain refractories that contain hexavalent chromium, which are generated infrequently.our facilities include but not limited to office trash, carbon black, solvents, refractory materials, catalyst materials, and non-saleable sulfuric acid. Certain facilities have on-site landfills permitted for the current disposal of non-hazardous solid waste.
Energy SurchargeSurcharge—
The German Renewable Energies Act (“EEG”) grants above-market payments to the producers of energy generated from renewable sources. To balance these payments, an energy surcharge is imposed on the consumers of such energy. Certain exemptions regarding that surcharge are provided in the EEG, in particular for energy intensive industries and self-consumption of self-produced energy. The European Commission opened an in-depth investigation procedure in December 2013 to examine whether the reductions granted under the EEG comply with EU state aid rules. Currently, the European Commission and the German government are working out an agreement regarding future benefits in that respect. Accordingly, the German legislator is amending the national regulations and setting up a new regime regarding energy intensive industries.captive usage. It is expected that the
oec-20211231_g1.jpg6

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
exemption from the energy surcharge regarding electricity generated for the Company’s own consumption will continue to be grandfathered. However, there is no assurance that we can maintain the exemption status permanently.
12



Environmental Proceedings
During 2008 and 2009, the EPA contacted all U.S. carbon black producers as part of an industry-wide EPA initiative, requesting extensive and comprehensive information under Section 114 of the U.S. Clean Air Act. The EPA used that information to determine, for each facility, that either: (i) the facility has been in compliance with the Clean Air Act; (ii) violations have occurred and enforcement litigation may be undertaken; or (iii) violations have occurred and a settlement of an enforcement case is appropriate. In response to information requests received by the Company’s U.S. facilities, the Company furnished information to the EPA on each of its U.S. facilities. EPA subsequently sent notices under Section 113(a) of the Clean Air Act in 2010 alleging violations of Prevention of Significant Deterioration (“PSD”) and Title V permitting requirements under the Clean Air Act at the Company’s Belpre (Ohio) facility. In October 2012, the Company received a corresponding notice and finding of violation (a “NOV”) alleging the failure to obtain PSD and Title V permits reflecting Best Available Control Technology (“BACT”) at several units of the Company’s Ivanhoe (Louisiana) facility, and in January 2013 the Company also received a NOV issued by the EPA for its facility in Borger (Texas) alleging the failure to obtain PSD and Title V permits reflecting BACT during the years 1996 to 2008. A comparable NOV for the Company’s U.S. facility in Orange (Texas) was issued by the EPA in February 2013; and EPA issued an additional NOV in March 2016 alleging more recent non-PSD air emissions violations primarily at the dryers and the incinerator of the Orange facility.
In 2013, Orion began discussions with the EPA and the U.S. Department of Justice about a potential settlement to resolve the NOVs received, which ultimately led to a consent decree executed between Orion Engineered Carbons LLC (for purpose of this section “Orion”) and the United States (on behalf of the EPA), as well as the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality. The consent decree (the “EPA CD”) became effective on June 7, 2018. The consent decree resolves and settles the EPA’s claims of noncompliance set forth in the NOVs and in a respective complaint filed in court against Orion by the United States immediately prior to the filing of the consent decree.
All five U.S. carbon black producers have settled with the U.S. government.
Under Orion’s EPA CD, Orion will install certain pollution control technology in order to further reduce emissions at its four U.S. manufacturing facilities in Ivanhoe (Louisiana), Belpre (Ohio), Borger (Texas), and Orange (Texas) over approximately six years. The EPA CD also requires the continuous monitoring of emissions reductions that Orion will need to comply with over a number of years. Orion has commenced the installation works for its Ivanhoe facility, and expects to complete the installation in this facility over the next year. Under the EPA CD, Orion can choose either its Belpre or Borger facilities as the next site for installation of pollution control equipment with comparable effectiveness. We expect the capital expenditures for installation of pollution control equipment in the remaining Orion facilities to decrease due to economies of scale and synergies from prior installations. We estimate the installations of monitoring and pollution control equipment at all four Orion plants in the U.S. will require capital expenditures of approximately $190 million, subject to the results of further scope design and estimation efforts presently underway. However, the actual total capital expenditures we might need to incur in order to fulfill the requirements of the EPA CD remain uncertain. The EPA CD allows some flexibility for Orion to choose among different technology solutions for reducing emissions and the locations where these solutions are implemented. The solutions Orion ultimately chooses to implement at its facilities other than Ivanhoe (Louisiana), may differ in scope and operation from those it currently anticipates (including those discussed in the next paragraph) and, for any and all of the its facilities, factors, such as timing, locations, target levels, changing cost estimates and local regulations, could cause actual capital expenditures to significantly exceed current expectations or affect Orion’s ability to meet the agreed target emission levels or target dates for installing required equipment as anticipated or at all. Noncompliance with applicable emissions limits could lead to penalty payments to the EPA.
As part of Orion’s compliance plan under the EPA CD, in April 2018 Orion signed a contract with Haldor Topsoe group to install its SNOXTM emissions control technology to remove SO2, NOx and dust particles from tail gases at Orion’s Ivanhoe, Louisiana Carbon Black production plant. The SNOXTM technology has not been used previously in the carbon black industry.
Orion’s Share Purchase Agreement with Evonik in connection with the Acquisition provides for a partial indemnity from Evonik against various exposures, including, but not limited to, capital investments, fines and costs arising in connection with Clean Air Act violations that occurred prior to July 29, 2011. Except for certain less relevant allegations contained in the second NOV received for the Company’s facility in Orange (Texas) in March 2016, all of the other allegations made by the EPA with regard to all four of the Company’s U.S. facilities - as discussed above - relate to alleged violations before July 29, 2011. The indemnity provides for a recovery from Evonik of a share of the costs (including fines), expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees, but excluding costs for maintenance and control in the ordinary course of business and any internal cost of monitoring the remedy), liabilities, damages and losses suffered and is subject to various contractual provisions including provisions set forth in the Share Purchase Agreement with Evonik, such as a de minimis clause, a basket, overall caps (which apply to all covered exposures and all covered environmental exposures, in the aggregate), damage mitigation and cooperation requirements, as well as a statute of limitations provision. Due to the cost-sharing and cap provisions in Evonik’s indemnity, the Company expects that substantial costs it has already incurred and will incur in this EPA enforcement initiative and the EPA CD likely will exceed the scope of the indemnity in the tens of millions of US dollars. In addition, Evonik signaled that it is not honoring Orion’s claims under the indemnity. In June 2019, Orion initiated arbitration proceedings to enforce its rights against Evonik. Evonik in turn has submitted certain counterclaims related to a tax indemnity and cost reimbursement against Orion, which counterclaims we do not believe to be material. Although Orion believes that it is entitled to the indemnity and that its rights thereunder are enforceable, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to recover costs or expenditures incurred under the indemnity as it expects or at all. See Chemical Regulations—“Item 1A. Risk-Factors-Risks Related to Indebtedness, Currency Exposure and Other Financial Matters-Our agreements with Evonik in connection
13



with the Acquisition require us to indemnify Evonik with respect to certain aspects of our business and require Evonik to indemnify us for certain retained liabilities. We cannot offer assurance that we will be able to enforce claims under these indemnities as we expect.”
Chemical Regulations
Some jurisdictions we operate in have established regimes to regulate or control chemical products to ensure the safe manufacture, use and disposal of chemicals.
In the European Union, the Regulation on Registration, Evaluation, Authorization of Chemicals (“REACh”) was signed in December 2006, came into effect on June 1, 2007 and requires chemical manufacturers and importers in the European Union to register all chemicals manufactured in, or imported into the European Union in quantities of more than one metric ton annually. Registration has to be made atwith the European Chemicals Agency (“ECHA”). The registration process requires capital, and resource commitments to compile and file comprehensive chemical dossiers regarding the use and attributes of each chemical substance manufactured or imported by us and requires us to perform chemical safety assessments. Moreover, the use of certain “highly hazardous chemicals” must be authorized by ECHA. Furthermore, REACh Regulation contains rules on bringing substances to the market that have been identified as substances of very high concern (“SVHC”). If identified as SVHC, manufactured substances will be listed on the “candidate list” and potentially prioritized for or inclusion into Annex XIV to the REACh Regulation which may mean a full ban or requirement for authorization to be granted by the European Commission at its discretion. Carbon black oils used as raw materials in the carbon black production are considered intermediates under REACh. Use of intermediates is exempted from authorization under REACh.
Registration of certain chemicals with ECHA has been compulsory since June 1, 2008. For pre-registered substances, three registration deadlines are applicable, depending on the tonnage of the substance. Substances manufactured or imported into the EU exceeding 1,000 mt/y and specific SVHC in lower volumes had to be registered before December 1, 2010. The second period regarding substances in quantities of 100 to 1,000 mt/y ended on May 31, 2013. The last deadline for substances of more than 1 mt/y was May 31, 2018.
Further national provisions exist that apply to our business. For example, under German law, the Chemicals Act (Chemikaliengesetz) and related ordinances impose particular obligations on producers, processors, and handlers of chemical agents. We have to comply with safety obligations in this respect, particularly regarding the handling and storage of hazardous substances.
concern. In the United States, we are subject to federal and state requirements relating to our business and products.chemical regulations. In particular, we are subject to the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act, known as Proposition 65. Among other requirements, Proposition 65which imposes labeling and record keeping requirements. Non-compliance may result in significant penalties or fines, and future amendments to Proposition 65 could result in increased labeling or other compliance obligations applicable to our products.
In South Korea, under the so called Chemical Control Act, was enacted. According to the act coal basedcoal-based feedstock oils such as CCT, CTD, SPOcrude coal tar (“CCT”), coal tar distillate (“CTD”) and soft pitch oil (“SPO”) containing more than 0.001%0.1% quinoline are treated as hazardous chemicals requiring production sites to be duly licensed to use these coal based feedstock from 2019. We may incur capital and operational expenses to meet the relevant requirements to become duly licensed.
We are a member of the International Carbon Black Association (the “ICBA”), which currently consists of representatives from carbon black manufacturers in Europe, North and South America, Asia and Africa.. The ICBA seeks to address common environmental, health and safety issues, undertakes research on health implications of carbon black, and serves as the leading advocate for the industry in the regulatory and public-interest arenas. The ICBA funds research on international environmental, health, product safety and workplace safety matters.
We are also a member of the European consortium for carbon black (“cb4reach Consortium”) which has pre-registered and registered carbon black with ECHA as required by the REACh Regulation. Besides the Company, the following companies are members of the cb4reach Consortium: Cabot Corporation, Cancarb Limited, Birla Carbon, Continental Carbon Company, Tokai Carbon CB Ltd. and Imerys S.A.Graphite & Carbon.
Health and Safety
Safety—The health and safety of our employees and customers is one of our highest priorities. We maintain very good performance in occupational injury and illness rates. New employees and contractors working on site are given environmental, health and safety (“EHS”) training and we keep track of environmental, healthEHS concerns and safety matters.issues. Employees are required to report and log incidents including near misses into the electronic environmental, health and safety (“EHS”)EHS management system. Our sites are required to implement and report EHS leading and lagging indicators for EHS performance. Plant managers are required to track and monitor these leading and lagging indicators and take action as appropriate. Leading and lagging indicator data and incidents are reviewed by senior management on a monthly basis.
Carbon black is produced under controlled conditions and has high purity levels. It therefore differs from other combustion products that may contain high concentrations of hazardous compounds. Due to its high purity, certain carbon black grades are permitted for use in cosmetics or in products in contact with food.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (“IARC”) classifies carbon black as a Group 2B substance (known animal carcinogen, possible(possible human carcinogen). We have communicated IARC’s classification of carbon black to our customers and employees in
14



accordance with applicable regulatory requirements. The Permanent Senate Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area (the “MAK Commission”) of the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft), which uses a different rating system, classifies carbon black as a suspect carcinogen (Category 3B). OtherTo the best our knowledge, other national and international health organizations have not rated carbon black. Any risk reclassification of our raw materials, intermediates or finished product could result in increased operating costs or affect product lines or sales.
The Community Rolling Action Plan (“CoRAP”) indicates substances for evaluation by the European Member States. The evaluation aims to clarify the initial concern that manufacturing and/or use of shortlisted substances could pose a risk to human health or the environment. With ECHA's update of the CoRAP list in March 2016 Carbon black was included in CoRAP for substance evaluation in 2018 though it has been postponed several times. TheWith ECHA’s most recent ECHA update from October 2019December 2021 the carbon black substance evaluation is proposed to be further delayed to 2022.2024. The substance evaluation for carbon black was proposed by France. The initial reasons of concern raised by the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (“ANSES”) relate to carbon black being an alleged carcinogenic substance and a suspected reproduction toxicant. Orion is working as a member of the cb4reach Consortium and ICBA to address the reasons for nomination. The conclusion of the evaluation may have significant business impact should ANSES conclude that carbon black poses a risk to human health. A potential outcome could be a harmonized classification and labeling of carbon black for carcinogenicity and toxicity to reproduction. These developments may significantly affect our business, including increasing costs of doing business.
According to the recommendation of October 18, 2011 (2011/696/EU), carbon black is defined as a nano-materialnanomaterial in Europe. Afterwards the ISO developed the ISO TC 229 “Nanotechnologies,” which considers carbon black as a “nano-structured material.” Other countries (such as, US, Canada, France, Belgium, Sweden, Switzerland, etc.) have implemented notification schemes related to nano materials. In Europe, Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/1881 as of December 3, 2018 amending the REACh regulation introduced new information requirements for substances with forms meeting the definition criteria of EU COM 2011/696/EU. The notification of carbon black under the different notification schemes as well as meeting the new nano-related information requirements under REACh requires capital and resource commitments to compile and file dossiers. Furthermore, more and more specific requirements for substances regarded as
oec-20211231_g1.jpg7

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
nanomaterials are emerging with Europe. For example, Germany is planning to introduce a more stringent Occupational Exposure Limit for nanomaterials. These developments may significantly affect our business, including increasing costs of doing business.
Further Regulatory Matters
We are subject to further governmental regulation from national, European Union and other international regulatory authorities concerning, among other things: product safety, export and import control regulations and other customs regulations, data protection and our competitive and marketplace conduct. We believe that we are in compliance in all material respects with these regulations. We cannot guarantee, however, that any future changes in the requirements or mode of enforcement of these laws and regulations will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Employees
As of December 31, 2019, we had 1,493 employees and approximately 362 contractors in our wholly-owned entities.
Labor Relations
Our employees in many countries are represented by employees labor unions in accordance with local law and practices, which could provide with participation and information rights to those representatives. Membership of employees labor unions varies in accordance with the business area, local practice and country in which we operate. We have entered into collective bargaining agreements with employees labor unions either directly or as members of employer organizations. In particular, 73% of our employees are covered by such bargaining agreements. These agreements typically govern, among other things, terms and conditions of employment and reflect the prevailing practices in each country. We believe we have stable relations with our employees and voluntary turnover has been low in recent years.
In 2017, 35 of the former employees in our closed facility in Ambès, France filed claims with the labor court of Bordeaux contesting the termination of their employment and seeking damages. The court held several hearings on the claims in 2018 and 2019. While we intend to continue to oppose these claims, our results of operations reflect accruals made by us to satisfy these claims should the former employees prevail.
Corporate information
Orion Engineered Carbons S.A. is a Luxembourg joint stock corporation (société anonyme or S.A.), incorporated on July 28, 2014 as a Luxembourg limited liability company (société à responsabilité limitée). The Company's registered office is located at 6, Route de Trèves, L-2633 Senningerberg (Municipality of Niederanven), Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Our principal executive offices are located in Houston, Texas, U.S., and our telephone number is (281) 318-2959. Our website address is www.orioncarbons.com. The SEC maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The information contained on, or that can be accessed through these websites is not part of, and is not incorporated into, this report.
15



Historically, our business operated as a business line of Evonik. Effective July 29, 2011, private investors indirectly acquired from Evonik the entities operating its carbon black business. On July 30, 2014, the Company completed its initial public offering. During 2017, Kinove Holdings sold all its remaining common shares. Currently, we operate on a fully stand-alone basis with all our shares held by public investors except for 505,142 shares held by us in treasury.

Available information
We make available on or through our internet website at www.orioncarbons.com, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such material with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. This Annual Report on Form 10-K and our other SEC filings are also accessible through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. All references to websites contained herein do not constitute incorporation by reference of information contained on such websites and such information should not be considered part of this document.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following risks may have material adverse effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additional risks and uncertainties of which we are not presently aware or that we currently deem immaterial could also materially affect our business operations and financial condition.
Risks Related to Our Business
The COVID-19 pandemic has had and could continue to have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Our global operations expose us to risks associated with public health crises and outbreaks of epidemic, pandemic, or contagious diseases, such as the current outbreak of a novel strain of coronavirus and its mutations (“COVID-19”). The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted the global economy and created significant volatility and disruption to supply-chain and financial markets. Many state and local jurisdictions have periodically imposed “lock down” orders to businesses and schools, personal or collective quarantines, restrictions on travel and mass gatherings as well as other measures to slow the spread of the virus.
The COVID-19 pandemic infection rate remains high in many parts of the world. The pandemic could adversely impact our operations in a number of ways, including the temporary suspension of production at our customer’s and our own manufacturing facilities, disruptions to our supply chain and to our capital projects, restrictions on the ability of many of our employees to work at optimal efficiency due to governmental mandated quarantine obligations and other restrictions. If we experience operational or supply chain disruptions, or such disruptions are exacerbated or prolonged in the future, our business, results of operations and liquidity may be adversely impacted. In particular, the inability of our suppliers to meet our supply needs in a timely manner or our quality standards could cause delays in delivery to our customers, which could result in the cancellation of orders, customers’ refusal to accept deliveries, a reduction in purchase prices, and termination of customer relationships, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. Even if we are able to find alternate sources for our supply needs, they may cost more, which could adversely impact our profitability and financial condition.
In addition, economic uncertainty may cause additional delays, cancellation, or redirections of planned orders.
The foregoing and other continued disruptions to our business as a result of COVID-19 could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The extent of the impact of COVID-19 on our operational and financial performance will depend on future developments, including the duration and spread of the COVID-19 outbreak, which is highly uncertain and cannot be predicted at this time.
Negative or uncertain worldwide economic conditions may result in business volatility and may adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our operations and performance are materially affected by worldwide economic conditions. Because carbon black is used in a diverse group of end products, demand for carbon black has historically been related to real gross domestic product (“GDP”) and general global economic conditions. In particular, a large part of our sales has direct exposure to the cyclical automotive industry and, to a lesser extent, the construction industry. As a result, our business experiences a level of inherent cyclicality. The nature of our business and our large fixed asset base make it difficult to rapidly adjust our fixed costs downward when demand for our products declines, which could materially affect our profitability. A global or regional economic downturn may reduce demand for our products, which would decrease our revenue and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In periods with significant market turmoil and tightened credit availability, we expect to experience difficulties in collecting accounts receivable, pricing pressure and reduced global or local business activity.
Structural changesThe COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, the economies and financial markets of many countries, as well as unemployment levels, resulting in a period of regional, national, and global economic recession that has curtailed or delayed spending by our customers’ customers, in particular in the industriesautomotive industry and increased the risk of customer defaults or delays in which we operatepayments. Our customers may resultterminate or attempt to amend their agreements for the purchase of our products due to decline in business volatilitytheir demand and may adversely affectproduction, bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, lack of funding, operational failures, or other reasons. COVID-19 and the current financial, economic, and capital markets environment, and future developments in these and other areas present material uncertainty and risk with respect to our business,performance, financial condition, volume of business, results of operations, and cash flows.
Our business is influenced by structural changes in the industries in which we operate, such as the entry of new suppliers, product substitution, changing technologies, industry consolidation and the migration of customers to lower-cost countries. Some of our customers have shifted, and may continue to shift, manufacturing capacity from mature regions, such as North America and Europe, to emerging regions, such as Asia and South America or Africa. Although we have developed and implemented strategies to meet these changes in demand, we cannot be certain that we will be able to successfully expand capacity in emerging regions. Our ability to expand in these regions depends in part on their economic, regulatory and political conditions and on our ability to establish and finance operations, construct additional manufacturing capacity or form strategic business alliances including acquisitions and joint ventures. In addition, we may not be successful in adapting capacity in mature regions commensurate with industry demand. Similarly, demand for our customers’ products and our competitors’ reactions to market conditions could affect our results. Our business is also sensitive to changes in industry capacity utilization. Prices tend to decrease when capacity utilization decreases, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg8

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Our business is subject to operational risks, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our operations are subject to hazards inherent in chemicals manufacturing and the related use, storage, transportation and disposal of feedstocks, products and wastes, including, but not limited to, fires and explosions, accidents, accidental oil or products releases, severe weather and natural disasters (including hurricanes, tornadoes, ice storms, droughts, floods and earthquakes)earthquakes, all of which are significantly increasing in likelihood because of climate change), pandemics or epidemics, mechanical failures, unscheduled downtime at our production facilities, transportation interruptions, disruption to harbor-, road-, pipeline- or storage tank-access, pipeline, tank and silos leaks and ruptures, quality problems, technical difficulties, energy grid shutdowns, discharges or releases of toxic or hazardous substances or gases, other environmental risks, and sabotage, terrorist attacks or other acts of violence as well as potential boycotts, general strikes, sanctions or blockades.
Such events could disrupt our supply of raw materials or otherwise affect sales, production, transportation and delivery of our products or affect demand for our products. We could incur significant expenditures in connection with such operational risks. These may be caused both by external factors, such as natural disasters, pandemics or epidemics, war, acts of terrorism, strikes, official orders,
16



technical interruptions or material defects and accidents or mistakes in internal procedures, such as fire, explosion or release of toxic or hazardous substances. In all of these cases, our property, third-party property or the environment may sustain damage, or there may be human exposure to hazardous substances, personal injuries or fatalities. Such events could result in material financial liabilities, civil or criminal law consequences, the temporary or permanent closure of the relevant production or administrative sites or power plantplants and a negative impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We are dependent on major customers for a significant portion of our sales, and a significant adverse change in a customer relationship could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Customer concentration is driven by the consolidated nature of the industries we serve. In 2019,2021, our top ten customers accounted for approximately 51%41% of our volume measured in thousand metric tons (“kmt”). Our success in strengthening relationships and growing business with our largest customers and retaining their business over extended time periods could affect our future results. The loss of any of our major customers (including due to industry consolidation) or a reduction in volumes sold to them, could adversely affect our results of operations. Any deterioration in the financial condition of any of our customers or the industries they operate in or serve that impairs our customers’ ability to make payments to us could decrease our sales or increase our uncollectible receivables and could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We may not be able to compete successfully in the industries and markets in which we operate.
The industries in which we operate are highly competitive based on price, product innovation, product quality, distribution capability, and industry and customer knowledge. We face competition from global and regional suppliers, both in developed and in emerging regions. While we aim to operate at low cost and are focused on reducing our fixed and variable cost base across our production chain, there may be improvements in the cost competitiveness of other manufacturers relative to us or in the performance properties of substitutable products and raw materials, which could result in advantages for our competitors and adversely affect our business. Furthermore, some of our competitors may have greater financial and other resources and larger capitalization than we do. If we are unable to respond successfully to changing competitive conditions, the demand for our products could be adversely affected which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We may not successfully develop new products and technologies that address our customers’ changing requirements or competitive challenges, and our customers may substitute our products by using other products we do not offer.
The industries into which we sell our products are subject to periodic technological changes, ongoing product improvements, product substitution and changes in customer requirements. Increased competition from existing or newly developed products offered by our competitors or companies whose products offer a similar or better functionality to our products may negatively affect demand for our products. We work to identify, develop and market innovative products on a timely basis to meet our customers’ changing requirements and competitive challenges. Should we not be able to substantially maintain or further develop our product portfolio, customers may elect to source comparable or other products from competitors, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Although carbon black continues to offer opportunities for product and process innovation, we cannot be certain that the investments we make in our innovation groupInnovation function will result in proportional increases in revenue or profits. In addition, the timely commercialization of products that we are developing may be disrupted or delayed by manufacturing or other technical difficulties, industry acceptance or insufficient industry size to support a new product, competitors’ new products, and difficulties in moving from the experimental stage to the production stage. These disruptions or delays could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
As a reinforcing agent in certain rubber applications, carbon black competes primarily with precipitated silica in combination with silane, which are both not part of our product portfolio. Historically, silica has offered some performance benefits over carbon black in the area of rolling resistance. To date, silica-based tire applications have gained position in passenger car tire treads. Although substitution has not been significant due to carbon black’s cost advantage, technological advances and changing customer requirements may lead to increased
oec-20211231_g1.jpg9

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
demand for silica-based tires, especially in developed regions. Increased substitution and competition from precipitated silica producers could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. If we should decide to include precipitated silica in combination with silane in our product portfolio in the future, we may be restricted in our ability to do so under our intellectual property sharing arrangements with Evonik.Evonik and its affiliates, one of our previous owners.
Alternative materials, procedures or technologies may be developed, or existing ones may be improved, and may replace those currently offered in the carbon black industry. If such newly developed or improved products are being offered at lower prices, have preferable features or other advantages, in particular from a regulatory perspective, and we are not able to offer similar new or improved products, we may lose substantial sales volumes or customers, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We may be unable to implement our business strategies in an effective manner.
Our future financial performance and success largely depend on our ability to maintain our current competitive position and to implement our business strategies for growth successfully. We cannot guarantee that we will successfully implement our business strategies or that
17



implementing these strategies will sustain or improve and not harm our results of operations. We may not be able to increase or sustain our manufacturing efficiency or asset utilization, enhance our current portfolio of products or achieve other fixed or variable cost savings. In addition, the costs involved in implementing our strategies may be significantly higher than we currently anticipate. Our ability to complete capacity expansions may be delayed or interrupted by the need to obtain environmental and other regulatory approvals, the availability of labor and materials, unforeseen hazards, such as weather conditions, adverse political or market developments, and other risks customarily associated with construction or expansion projects. Moreover, the cost of expanding capacity could have a negative impact on our financial results until capacity utilization is sufficient to absorb the incremental costs associated with the expansion. Further, labor or governmental restrictions could impede or delay our ability to reduce headcount in the event headcount reduction is deemed to be sensible in our opinion.
Our business strategies are based on our assumptions about future demand for our existing products and the new products and applications we are developing, and on our continuing ability to produce our products profitably. Each of these factors depends on, among other things, our ability to realign our product portfolio, divest businesses or discontinue product lines on favorable terms and with minimal disruptions, finance our operations and product development activities, negotiate favorable terms, maintain high-quality and efficient manufacturing operations, relocate and close certain manufacturing facilities with minimal disruption to our operations, respond to competitive and regulatory changes, access quality raw materials in a cost-effective and timely manner, and retain and attract highly skilled technical, managerial, marketing and finance personnel. Any failure to develop, revise or implement our business strategies in a timely and effective manner may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We are subject to volatility in the costs, quality and availability of raw materials and energy, which could decrease our production volumes and margins and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our manufacturing processes consume significant amounts of raw materials and energy, the costs of which are subject to fluctuations in worldwide supply and demand as well as other factors beyond our control. In 2019, raw materials accounted for 75% of our cost of sales. Approximately 79%The preponderance of the cost of raw material used in the production of carbon black is related to petroleum-based or coal-based feedstock known as carbon black oil, with some limited use of other raw materials, such as acetylene, nitrogen tetroxide, hydrogen and natural gas. We obtain a considerable portion of our raw materials and energy from selected key suppliers. Although we maintain raw material reserves, if any of these suppliers is unable to meet its obligations under supply agreements with us on a timely basis or at all, or if we cannot source sufficient supply, we may be forced to incur higher costs to obtain the necessary raw materials and energy elsewhere or, in certain limited cases, we may not be able to obtain carbon black oil or raw materials at all. Additionally, raw material sourcing and related infrastructure (like(e.g., harbor access, cargo or ship availability, pipeline-, tank- or road-access), may be subject to local developments or regulations in certain jurisdictions where we operate that may reduce, delay or halt the physical supply of raw materials. Our inability to source quality raw materials or energy in a timely fashion and pass throughpass-through cost increases to our customers could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Most of our rubber carbon black supply contracts contain provisions that adjust prices to account for changes in a relevant feedstock price index. We are exposed to oil price fluctuations and there can be no assurance that we will be able to shift price risks to our customers. Success in offsetting increased raw material, energy and tax or tariff costs with related price increases is also influenced by competitive and economic conditions, as well as the speed and severity of such changes, and could vary significantly, depending on the segment served. Such increases may not be accepted by our customers, may not be fully reflected in the indices used in our pricing formulas, may not be sufficient to compensate for increased raw material and energy costs or may decrease demand for our products and our volume of sales. RapidOil and significant oil or energy price fluctuations have had and are likely to continue to have significant and varying effects on our earnings and results of operations, partly because oil price changes affect our sales prices and our cost of raw materials and energy at different times and amounts, and partly due to other factors, such as differentials affecting the ultimate carbon black oil price paid by us (versus a particular reference price index), carbon black oil usage amounts and ongoing efficiency initiatives.initiatives, the value of which fluctuates with oil prices. Failure to fully offset the effects of fluctuating raw material or energy costs could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Further, volatility in costs and pricing could result in commercial disputes with suppliers and customers regarding the interpretations of complex contractual pricing arrangements, which could adversely affect our business.
Significant movements in the market price for crude oil tend to create volatility in our carbon black feedstock costs, which can affect our Net Working Capital, cash requirements and operating results. Most recently the International Maritime Organization introduced regulatory changes, known as “MARPOL”, to further restrict the sulfur emissions for the shipping industry beginning January 1, 2020. This has and could impact the prices and the availability of certain types of oil we use as feedstock for our products. Changes in raw material and energy prices have a direct impact on our Net
oec-20211231_g1.jpg10

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Working Capital levels. Increases in the cost of raw materials lead to an increase in our Net Working Capital. Due to the quantity of carbon black oil and finished goods that we typically keep in stock together with the levels of receivables and payables maintained, increases occur gradually over a two to three-month period but can vary depending on inventory levels and working capital levels generally. Net Working Capital swings are particularly significant in an environment of high price volatility.
Any failure to realize benefits from investments, joint ventures, acquisitions or alliances could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We have made, and may continue to make, investments and acquisitions and enter into joint ventures. The success of acquisitions of existing facilities, new technologies, companies and products, or arrangements with third parties is not always predictable and we may not achieve our anticipated objectives.
18



Plant capacity expansions and site development projects may be delayed and/or may not achieve the expected benefits.
Our ability to complete capacity expansions and consolidations as planned, including capacity conversions from rubber carbon black to specialty carbon black and vice versa, and other site development projects, including those associated with yield efficiency improvements or emission controls, may be delayed, interrupted, or otherwise limited by the need to obtain environmental and other regulatory approvals, unexpected cost increases, availability of labor and materials, unforeseen hazards such as weather or health conditions, and other risks customarily associated with construction projects. In addition, lower oil prices may result in lower yield efficiency improvements. Moreover, the costs of these activities could have a negative impact on our results of operations and capacity utilization at any particular facility may not be able to absorb the incremental costs associated with capacity expansion projects. In addition, our ability to expand capacity in emerging countries depends in part on economic and political conditions in these regions and, in some cases, on our ability to establish operations, construct additional manufacturing capacity or form strategic business alliances.
The capital expenditures we might need to incur under the EPA consent decree remain uncertain; timing, locations, target levels and other factors could also affect our ability to meet target emission levels and target dates under the EPA consent decree.
On June 7, 2018, a consent decree (the “EPA CD”) between Orion Engineered Carbons LLC (for purposes of this risk factor, “Orion”) and the United States on behalf of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), as well as the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality became effective. The consent decree resolvesSee “Note Q. Commitments and settlesContingencies” to the EPA’s claimsCompany’s audited financial statements included in this Annual Report in Form 10-K for a description of noncompliance set forth in the notices and finding of violations from the EPA with respect toCD. We have four plant sites that fall under the Company's U.S. facilities.
Under Orion’s EPA CD, Orion will install certain pollution control technology in order to further reduce emissionsof which the construction projects at its four U.S. manufacturing facilities in Ivanhoe (Louisiana), Belpre (Ohio), Borger (Texas), and Orange (Texas) over approximately six years. The EPA CD also requires the continuous monitoring of emissions reductions that Orion will need to comply with over a number of years. The installations for the Orange facility need to be in operation in 2020 and installations for the Ivanhoe facility in 2021. Orion has commenced the installation works for its Ivanhoe facility, and expects to complete the installation in this facility over the next year. Under the EPA CD, Orion can choose either its Belpre or Borger facilities as the next site for installation of pollution control equipment with comparable effectiveness to Ivanhoe. We expect the capital expenditures for installation of pollution control equipment in the remaining Orion facilities to decrease due to economies of scale and synergies from prior installations. have been completed.
We estimate the installations of monitoring and pollution control equipment at all fourthe remaining two Orion plants in the U.S. will require capital expenditures ofexpenditure totaling approximately $190 million,$90 million. This could be further revised subject to the results of further scope design and estimation efforts presently underway. However, the actual total capital expenditures we might need to incur in order to fulfill the requirements of the EPA CD remain uncertain. The EPA CD allows some flexibility for Orion to choose among different technology solutions for reducing emissions and the locations where these solutions are implemented. The solutions Orion ultimately chooses to implement at its remaining facilities other than Ivanhoe (Louisiana), may differ in scope and operation from those it currently anticipates for any and all of its foursuch facilities and factors, such as timing, locations, target levels, changing cost estimates and local regulations, could cause actual capital expenditures to significantly exceed current expectations or affect Orion’s ability to meet the agreed target emission levels or target dates for installing required equipment as anticipated or at all. Noncompliance with applicable emissions limits could lead to payments to the EPA or other penalties.

We may be subject to information technology systems failures, network disruptions, cybersecurity attacks and breaches of data security.
We rely on information technology systems to manage and operate our production facilities, business, process transactions, and to summarize our operating results. Our information technology systems are an important element for effectively operating our business. Information technology systems failures, particularly in connection with running SAP, including risks associated with upgrading or timely updating our systems, network disruptions, missuses, cybercrime and breaches of data security, could disrupt our production as well as our operations by impeding our processing of transactions, our ability to protect customer or company information and our financial reporting, and lead to increased costs. It is possible that future technological developments could adversely affect the functionality of our computer systems and require further action and substantial funds to prevent or repair computer malfunctions. Our information technology systems, including our back-up systems, are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, cybercrime, internal or external security breaches, catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, floods, tornadoes, hurricanes, acts of war or terrorism, and usage errors by our employees or third-party providers. Although we have taken extensive steps to address these concerns by implementing sophisticated network security, back-up systems and internal control measures, there can be no assurance that a system failure or data security breach will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. If our information technology systems are damaged or cease to function properly, we may have to make a significant investment to fix or replace them, and we may suffer loss of critical data and interruptions or delays in our production and operations. Any material disruption in our information technology systems, or delays or difficulties in implementing or integrating new systems or enhancing current systems, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We also face global cybersecurity threats, which may range from uncoordinated individual attempts to sophisticated and targeted measures, known as advanced persistent threats, directed at us. Cybersecurity attacks and security breaches may include, but are not limited to, attempts to access information, computer viruses, denial of service and other electronic security breaches.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg11

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
We believe that we face a moderate threat of cybersecurity attacks. We have experienced non-material cybersecurity attacks in the past, and may experience them in the future, potentially with more frequency or sophistication. Based on information known to date, past
19



attacks have not had a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. However, dueDue to the evolving nature of cybersecurity threats, the scope and impact of any future incident cannot be predicted.
While we continually work to safeguard our systems and mitigate potential risks, there is no assurance that such actions will be sufficient to prevent cybersecurity attacks or security breaches that manipulate or improperly use our systems or networks, compromise confidential or otherwise protected information, destroy or corrupt data, or otherwise disrupt our operations. The occurrence of such events could negatively impact our reputation and our competitive position and could result in litigation with third parties, regulatory action, loss of business, potential liability and increased remediation costs, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, such attacks or breaches could require significant management attention and resources, and result in the diminution of the value of the Company’s investment in research and development and other assets. A breakdown in existing controls and procedures around the Company’s cybersecurity and security prevention environment may prevent us from detecting, reporting or responding to cybersecurity incidents in a timely manner and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or the market price of our securities.
In addition to supporting our operations, we use our systems to collect and store confidential and sensitive data, including information about our know-how, technology and business, as well as about our customers and our employees. As our technology continues to evolve, we anticipate that we will collect and store even more data in the future, and that our systems will increasingly use remote communication features that are sensitive to both willful and unintentional security breaches. Much of our value is derived from our confidential business information, including customer data, proprietary technology and trade secrets. To the extent the confidentiality of such information is compromised, we may lose our competitive advantage, and our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may suffer. We also collect, retain and use personal information, including data we gather from customers for product development and marketing purposes, and data we obtain from employees. In the event of a breach in security that allows third parties access to this personal information, we are subject to a variety of laws on a global basis that require us to provide notification to the data owners, and that subject us to lawsuits, fines and other means of regulatory enforcement. Our reputation could suffer in the event of such a data breach, which could cause customers to purchase from our competitors. Ultimately, any compromise of our data security could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
If we are unable to successfully negotiate with the representatives of our employees, including labor unions and works councils, we may experience strikes and work stoppages.
We are party to collective bargaining agreements and social plans with our employees’ labor unions. In particular, 73% of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We also are required to consult with our employee representatives, such as works councils, on certain matters such as restructuring, acquisitions and divestitures. Although we believe that our relations with our employees are good, there can be no assurance that current agreements may not be terminated, new agreements will be reached or consultations will be completed without union or works council actions or on terms satisfactory to us. Current and future negotiations and consultations with employee representatives could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, a material work stoppage or union dispute could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We may not be able to recruit or retain key management and personnel.
Our success is dependent on the management and leadership skills of our key management and personnel. The loss of any member of our key leadership team and personnel or an inability to attract, retain, develop and maintain additional personnel could prevent us from implementing our business strategy. The loss of one or more membermembers of our key management or operating personnel, or the failure to attract, retain and develop additional key personnel, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We are exposed to political or country risk inherent in doing business in some countries.
We operate a global network of production plants, located in Europe, North America, South Korea, China, South Africa and Brazil. Accordingly, our business is subject to risks related to the different legal, political, social and regulatory requirements and economic conditions of many jurisdictions. Risks inherent in international operations include the following: changes in the rate of economic growth,growth; unsettled political or economic conditions,conditions; expropriation or other governmental actions; social unrest, war, terrorist activities or other armed conflict; national and regional labor strikes,strikes; confiscatory taxation or other adverse tax policies, trade and or tariff disputes between countries,countries; deprivation of contract rights,rights; trade regulations affecting production, pricing and marketing of products; reduced protection of intellectual property rights; restrictions on the repatriation of income or capital,capital; exchange controls,controls; inflation, deflation, and currency fluctuations and devaluation,devaluation; the effect of global environmental, health and safety issues,issues; pandemics or epidemics, onepidemics; economic conditions, market opportunities and operating restrictions,restrictions; changes in foreign laws and tax rates,rates; changes in trade sanctions or embargoes that result in losing access to customers and suppliers in those countries,countries; costs associated with compliance with anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws,laws; nationalization of private enterprises by foreign governments,governments; and changes in financial policy and availability of credit or financing sources. These factors could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
20
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
12


Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Legal and Regulatory Risks
Our operations are subject to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. We have been and may in the future be subject to investigations by regulatory authorities in respect of alleged violations and may incur significant costs to maintain compliance with, and to address liabilities under, these laws and regulations.
We are subject to extensive supranational, domestic, foreign, federal, state and local laws and regulations governing environmental protection and occupational health and safety, all of which may be subject to change in the future. The production and processing of carbon black and other chemicals we produceits byproducts involve the handling, transportation, manufacture, use and disposal of substances or components that may pose environmental risks or be considered toxic, hazardous or carcinogenic under theseapplicable laws. We are also required to obtain permits or other approvals from various regulatory authorities for our operations, which may be required for matters including air emissions;emissions as well as wastewater and storm water discharges;discharge, storage, handling and disposal of hazardous substances;substances, remediation of soil or buildings and operation, maintenance and closure of landfills. If we violate or are found to have violated or otherwise fail to comply with these laws, regulations or permits or other approvals, or fail to receive the timely renewal of and due application for required permits, we may have to limit production, we may incur fines and civil or othercriminal sanctions, be required to undertake significant capital expenditures to achieve compliance, or be subject to other obligations by one or more regulatory authorities. Certain environmental laws and regulations could also impose strict liability, meaning the Company could be forced to incur liability for environmental damage caused by a party other than the Company, even in circumstances where the Company’s actions were entirely lawful.
If environmental harm to soil, groundwater, surface water or natural resources is found to have occurred as a result of our current or historical operations, (prior to the existence of the Company), and we may be required to incur significant remediation costs at our current or former production facilities or at third-party sites. Many of our facilities have a long history of operation, which may contribute to ourmight in the future incur environmental compliance and remediation costs due to past spills, chemical storage, wastewater treatment and waste disposal practices and other activities.activities depending on developing laws. For instance, manysome of our facilities have onsite landfills that have been in useopen for a number of years, andyears; we may incur significant costs when these landfills reach capacity in order to close themare closed in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and to address contamination of soil and groundwater at, under or migrating from the facilities, including costs to address impacts to natural resources.regulations. Under certain laws and regulations, the obligations to investigate and remediate contamination at a facility or site may be imposed on current and former owners or operators, or on persons who may have sentdisposed of waste to that facility or site for disposal.on–site. Liability under such laws and regulations may be without regard to fault or to the legality of the activities giving rise to the contamination. As a result, we may incur liabilities for wastes, including hazardous wastes, generated by our operations and disposed of onsite or at offsite locations, even if we were not responsible forat the disposal.time the waste was disposed. Further, we may also incur additional closure and cleanup costs in connection with the closure of plants or separate feedstock storage sites, including costs relating to decommissioning of equipment, asbestos removal and relocation or closure of featuresoperating equipment such as storage tanks, wastewater treatment systems, ponds and landfills.
We store carbon black oil and other substances in underground and above ground storage tanks. Our operations are also subject toinherently create significant hazards and risks inherent inwhen storing carbon black oil, andconverting carbon black products.oil to carbon black and packaging and storing of carbon black and shipping the products to the customers. These hazards and risks include fires, explosions, spills, discharges and other releases, any of which could impact the environment, neighboring community and our employees, which could result in, distribution difficulties and disruptions, environmental pollution, governmentally imposed fines or clean up obligations, personal injury or wrongful death claims and other damage to our properties& neighboring properties. In these cases, the authority could impose fines and the propertiesCompany could be required to rectify any damage which occurs outside of others.our fence lines.
Environmental and safety regulations are subject to frequent change, as are the priorities of those who enforce them, and we could incur substantial costs to comply with future laws and regulations. The trend in environmental regulation is imposingto impose increasingly stringent restrictions on activities that may affect the environment. Such future regulations include legislation designed to reduce emissions of GHG, SO2, NOx, particulate matter and other air pollutants. For instance, the European Union has enacted GHG legislation and continues to expand the scope of such legislation. The EPA has promulgated regulations applicable to operations involving greenhouse gas emissions above a certain threshold, and the United States and certain states within the United States have enacted, or are considering, limitations on GHG emissions. Any new or amended environmental laws and regulations may result in costly measures for matters subject to regulation, including but not limited to more stringent limits or control requirements for our air emissions; new or increased compliance obligations relating to emission of GHG, emissions; stricter requirements for noise, waste handling, storage, transport, disposal, wastewaterSO2, NOx, and storm water discharges; and more stringent cleanup and remediation standards,particulate matter; any parameter our operations could have on the environment or surrounding community; which, in each case, could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition. We may be unable to offset these costs with price increases, productivity improvements, or cost-reduction efforts. Any success we do have in offsetting these costs will depend on competitive and economic conditions that are inherently variable.
Compliance with future more stringent environmental laws and regulations may result in significantly increased capital expenditures related to prevention and remediation. Our ability to continue as a going concern may be impacted if we are unable to finance these increasing compliance costs. Regardless, we will be forced to evaluate what non-capital expenditure costs need to be incurred in order to satisfy climate change and other environmental disclosure obligations imposed on us by the various regulations.
Certain national and international health organizations have classified carbon black as a possible or suspect human carcinogen. To the extent that, in the future, (i) these organizations re-classify carbon black as a known or confirmed carcinogen, (ii) other organizations or government authorities in other jurisdictions classify carbon black or any of our other finished products, raw materials or intermediates as suspected or known carcinogens or (iii) there is discovery of adverse health effects attributable to the production or use of carbon black or any of our other finished products, raw materials or intermediates, we could be required to incur significantly higher costs to comply with environmental, health and safety laws, or to comply with restrictions on sales of our products, and our reputation and business could be adversely affected.affected, and we could become the subject of litigation or enforcement actions. In addition, chemicals that are currently classified
oec-20211231_g1.jpg13

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
as harmless may be classified as dangerous in the future, and our products may have characteristics that are not recognized today but may be found in the future to impair human health or to be carcinogenic. See “Item 1. Business—Business, Environmental, Health and Safety Matters.”

Regulations requiring a reduction of or additional taxes of fees on greenhouse gas emissions could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and increased awareness and adverse publicity about potential impacts on the climate change by us or other companies in our industry could harm our reputationreputation.
Significant volumes of carbon dioxide (“CO2”), a GHG, are emitted in carbon black manufacturing processes. Over the past few decades, concerns about the relationship between GHGs and global climate change have resulted in increased levels of scrutiny from regulators, investors and the public alike, and have led to proposed and enacted regulations on both national and supranational levels, to monitor, regulate, control and tax emissions of CO2 and other GHGs. Investors have also begun to voice concern about sustainability and
21



climate change as it relates to their investment decisions. Increased awareness in the investment community and any adverse publicity in the global marketplace about potential impacts on climate change by us or other companies in our industry could harm our reputation.
The international community continues to negotiate a binding treaty that would require reductions in GHG emissions by developed countries. In addition, a number of further measures addressing GHG emissions may be implemented, such as a successor international agreement, if any, to the Kyoto Protocol and the European Union’sEU’s proposal to consider raising its commitment to reduce carbon emissions to at least 55% below 1990 levels by 20% to a 40% reduction by 2030 (compared to 1990 emission levels).2030. The United Nations Conference on Climate Change in December 2015 led to the creation of the Paris Agreement and encourages countries to continuously review and improve their GHG emission reduction goals. While signing the Paris Agreement does not legally bind countries to reduce GHG emissions, countries that participate may respond by enacting legislation or regulations in order to progress in lowering GHG emissions. In the United States, Congress has from time to time considered legislation to reduce emissions of GHGs, but no comprehensive legislation has been enacted to date, and significant uncertainty currently exists as to how any such GHG legislation or regulations would impact large stationary sources, such as our facilities in Belpre (Ohio), Borger (Texas), Orange (Texas) and Ivanhoe (Louisiana), and what costs or operational changes these regulations may require in the future. The current administration has withdrawn from the Paris Agreement. There are currently no efforts within the US Congress or the EPA to proceed with additional GHG regulations on a national level. However, almost one-half of theSome U.S. states have taken legal measures to reduce emissions of GHGs, primarily through the development of GHG emission inventories and/or regional or state GHG cap-and-trade programs. South Africa, where we have an operating plant, has adopted CO2 tax regime. There are also ongoing discussions and regulatory initiatives in other countries, including in Brazil and South Korea where we have facilities, regarding GHG emission reduction programs, but those programs have not yet been defined. There is no assurance that, in the future, the current level of regulation will continue in the jurisdictions where we operate. In addition, several countries, includingspanning across Europe, the European Union,Middle East, Africa, and the Asia-Pacific, are currently evaluating further and more restrictive regulations to reduce GHG emissions.emissions and to implement stricter environmental regulations generally.
Compliance with current or future GHG regulations governing our operations may result in significantly increased capital and operating expenditures for measures such as the installation of more environmentally efficient technology or the purchase of allowances to emit GHGs. Examples of such expenditures may include, but are not limited to, becoming subject to carbon dioxide and GHG emission trading requirements under which we may be required to purchase carbon credits and other offsets aimed at reducing our ecological footprint if our emission levels exceed our allocations. Costs of complying with regulations could increase, as concerns related to greenhouse gases and climate change continue to emerge. The enactment of new environmental laws and regulations and/or other GHGs.the more aggressive interpretation of existing requirements could require us to incur significant costs for compliance or capital improvements or limit our current or planned operations, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings or cash flow. We attempt to offset the effects of these compliance costs through price increases, productivity improvements and cost reduction efforts. Such price increases may not be accepted by our customers, may not be sufficient to compensate for increased regulatory costs or may decrease demand for our products and our volume of sales. While their potential effect on our manufacturing operations or financial results cannot be estimated, it could be substantial. There is no way to predict the form that future regulations may take or to estimate any costs that we may be required to incur with respect to these or any other future requirements. In addition to the increased expenditures outlined above, such requirements could also adversely affect our energy supply, or the costs (and types) of raw materials we use, and ultimately may directly or indirectly restrict our operations or reduce demand for our products. The realization of any or all of these consequences could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. See “Item 1. Business—Business, Environmental, Health and Safety Matters.”
Developing regulation of carbon black as a nano-scale material could require us to comply with costly new requirements.
Carbon black consists of aggregates of primary nano-scale particles. The EPA and other governmental agencies are currently developing a regulatory approach under which they will collect further data on nano-scale materials, including carbon black, under the Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”). The EPA has proposed rules that would require manufacturers of nano-scale materials to submit additional manufacturing information, exposure and release information and available health and safety data. Based on a review of the Rule and the Working Guidance issued by the EPA, it is the determination of the International Carbon Black Association (ICBA) that carbon black is not subject to reporting under the TSCA 8(a) Reporting Rule. However,In addition, the EPA and other nations’ environmental regulatory authorities, including the European Commission, are also conducting extensive environmental health and safety testing of nano-scale materials. If carbon black is found to be harmful to humans and/or to the environment, it could be subject to more stringent regulatory control, which could require us to incur significantly higher costs to comply with new environmental, health and safety laws and could adversely affect our reputation and business. See “Item 1. Business—Business, Environmental, Health and Safety Matters.”
Parallel to the TSCA, the European Commission is in the process of defining “nano-material”. According to its recommendation of October 18, 2011 (2011/696/EU) carbon black is defined as a nano-material.nanomaterial. In a similar approach, the International Organization for Standardization (“ISO”) developed the ISO TC 229 “Nanotechnologies,” which considers carbon black a “nano-structured material.” The industry is not yet generally affected by these definitions. However, certain regulations regarding cosmetics applications or articles which are intended for food contact have already been implemented, and other regulations are being discussed which may affect the use of carbon
oec-20211231_g1.jpg14

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
black in the future. This development may significantly affect our business in a manner we cannot predict, including by increasing the costs of doing business or decreasing the marketability of our products.
Our operations have the potential to cause environmental and other damage as well as personal injury.
The operation of a chemical manufacturing business as well as the sale and distribution of chemical products involve safety, health and environmental risks. For example, the production and processing of carbon black and other chemicals involves the storage, handling, transportation, manufacture or use of certain substances or components that may be considered toxic or hazardous. Our manufacturing processes and the storage and transportation of chemical products entail risks such as leaks, fires, explosions, toxic releases or mechanical failures. If operational risks materialize, they could result in injury or loss of life, damage to the environment or damage to property. In addition, the occurrence of material operating problems at our facilities due to any of these hazards may result in loss of production, which, in turn, may make it difficult for us to meet customer needs. Accordingly, these hazards and their consequences could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, both during and after the period of operational difficulties, and could harm our reputation.
22



The European Union REACh legislation or similar legislation in other countries may affect our ability to manufacture and sell certain products.
In December 2006, the European UnionEU signed the REACh (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals) legislation. This legislation requires chemical manufacturers and importers in the European UnionEU to demonstrate the safety of the chemical substances contained in their products through a substance registration process. We have registered under REACh, which is a functional prerequisite to the continued sale of our products in the European UnionEU markets. REACh presents a risk to the continued sale of our products in the European UnionEU should our existing classification registration no longer apply as a result of changes in the interpretation of REACh by the authorities, changes in our product mix or purity, or if the European UnionEU seeks to ban or materially restrict the production or importation of the chemical substances used in our products. In March 2016, the European Chemical Agency (ECHA) announced a carbon black substance evaluation, and carbon black was included in the Community Rolling Action Plan (CoRAP). CoRAP listed substances have been prioritized for substance evaluation. The reasons for including carbon black in CoRAP are carbon black being suspected of posing a risk to human health (carcinogenic, suspected reproduction toxicant), exposure of workers, exposure of sensitive populations and a high (aggregated) tonnage and use potential. The evaluation, which will be conducted by ANSES (the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety), is scheduled to take place from 2020 to 2022starting in 2024 under the draft CoRAP (which is likely to be adopted in 2020)2022). The outcome of the evaluation will be of significant importance for the carbon black industry.
Additionally, other organizations and countries, including South Korea and China, have adopted or may in the future adopt comparable or even more restrictive regulations than REACh, which could affect our ability to manufacture and sell certain products in the future.
In certain jurisdictions, carbon black has been added to lists of hazardous products that are subject to labeling and other requirements. Compliance with these requirements is required to sell our products in these jurisdictions, and noncompliance may result in material fines or penalties.penalties or other enforcement actions, including injunctions, recalls or seizures, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Changes in the classification of carbon black on these lists or to the applicable regulations could result in more stringent or new requirements and adversely affect our compliance costs. See “Item 1. Business—Business, Environmental, Health and Safety Matters.”
Market and regulatory changes may affect our ability to sell or otherwise benefit from co-generated energy, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and cash flows.
Currently, eight of our manufacturing sites have some form of co-generation transforming combustiblewaste heat from combusting exhaust gas, the main by-product of the carbon black production process, into electricity, steam or hot water. Some of this co-generated energy is self-consumed and the excess may be sold to third parties. Our ability to benefit from co-generation, and in particular our ability to sell it to third parties, may be limited due to general market conditions or regulatory changes, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and cash flows.
In December 2013, the European Commission opened an in-depth investigation into certain exemptions from an energy surcharge granted under the German Renewable Energies Act (Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz or “EEG”). Under the EEG, energy intensive industries are exempted to a large extent from the energy surcharge that aims to balance above-market payments for green energy. Another exemption exists for the consumption of self-generated electricity. The German legislature amended the national regulations of the EEG in August 2014. Under new regulations, the exemption regarding self-consumption (Eigenverbrauch) of self-produced electricity is grandfathered for power plants that were installed before August 1, 2014. Our German production facilities are exempted from the energy surcharge under the current law to the extent that we consume our self-produced energy. However, a potential loss of this benefit due to a future change in legislation or a change in the material setup of any of our plants may adversely affect our business, results of operations and cash flows.
Litigation or legal proceedings could expose us to significant liabilities and thus adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
From time to time, we may be involved in various claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of our business. In particular, certain asbestos related claims have been filed with respect to time periods when Evonik and other precedingprevious owners were in control of our business. Some of those claims are subject to a limited indemnity from Evonik under the agreements related to the Acquisition. Some matters are not covered by an indemnity and
oec-20211231_g1.jpg15

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
involve claims for large amounts of damagesdamage payments as well as other relief. Additional claims by (former) employees based on alleged past exposure to asbestos have been received by the Company andor other substances with negative health effects may be received in the future.
We may also be subject to litigation based on environmental matters such has pollution, remediation, contamination, or exposure to hazardous substances either in the workplace or resulting from the use of our products. This litigation could result in substantial liability for
us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or profitability. Certain environmental groups could
also initiate litigation against us, which could cause reputational as well as financial harm.
The outcome of legal proceedings is extremely difficult to predict, and we offer no assurances in this regard. Adverse rulings, judgments or settlements in pending or future litigation, including employment-related litigation, contract litigation, intellectual property disputes, product liability claims, personal injury claims, claims based on alleged exposure to asbestos, chemicals or to carbon black, environmental permitting disputes or in connection with environmental remediation activities or contamination, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Because many of our products provide critical performance attributes to our customers’ applications and products, the sale of these products involves a risk of product liability claims against us, including claims arising in connection with the use of, or exposure to, our products. Our products have widespread end-uses in a variety of consumer industries. A successful product liability claim, or series of claims, arising out of these various uses that results in liabilities in excess of our insurance coverage or for which we are not indemnified by a third party or have not otherwise provided, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
23



In particular, we could be required to increase our debt or divert resources from other investments in our business in order to discharge any such liabilities.
We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights successfullysuccessfully.
Our intellectual property rights are important to our success and competitive position. We own various patents and other intellectual property rights, and have licenses to use intellectual property rights covering some of our products as well as certain processes and product uses. We often choose not to seek to patent a production method or product in order to avoid disclosure of business specific know-how. In addition to patents, a significant part of our intellectual property are our trade secrets, general know-how and experience regarding manufacturing technology, plant operation and quality management, which third parties, including our competitors, may develop independently without violating our trade secret rights. We make careful assessments with respect to production process improvements and decide whether to apply for patents or retain and protect them as trade secrets. In some of the countries in which we operate or sell products, such as China, the laws protecting patent holders are significantly weaker than in the United States,U.S., the European UnionEU and certain other countries.regions. When we file a patent application, it is usually filed for all countries with active competition, where we have existing customers. Nonetheless, because the laws and enforcement mechanisms in some countries may not be as effective as in others, and because our intellectual property rights may, if asserted, ultimately be found to be invalid or unenforceable, we may not be able to protect all of our intellectual property rights successfully. Insufficient protection of intellectual property may limit our ability to make use of technological advantages or result in a reduction of future profits. This may cause competitive restrictions and may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We may also be subject to claims that our products, processes or product uses infringe or misappropriate the intellectual property rights of others. These claims, even if without merit, can be expensive and time consuming to litigate. We are, for example, currently in a dispute with Haldor Topsoe in which we may not ultimately prevail. In such proceedings, we have asserted certain patent and contractual rights against Haldor Topsoe seeking monetary and injunctive relief, and Haldor Topsoe has asserted certain patent, contractual and common law claims seeking monetary and declaratory relief. If we were to suffer an adverse ruling, we could be subject to injunctions, obligedobligated to pay damages or enter into licensing agreements requiring royalty payments and use restrictions, all of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, licensing agreements may not be available to us, and, if available, may not be available to us on acceptable terms.
In connection with the separation of our business from Evonik, Evonik assigned to us intellectual property that was exclusively used in its carbon black business as well as certain intellectual property rights that are still in use in its retained business. Evonik retained ownership of certain intellectual property that is not material to us. Evonik has granted us a non-exclusive license to use such retained intellectual property in the field of carbon black. In addition, we have granted back to Evonik licenses relating to some of our intellectual property rights to use such intellectual property in all fields outside the field of carbon black, which licenses are exclusive, subject to certain exceptions in areas adjacent to carbon black. Accordingly, we may be restricted in leveraging the intellectual property that we use on the basis of a license from Evonik or the intellectual property that is subject to the grant-back licenses to expand our business into fields outside of carbon black.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg16

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Risks Related to Indebtedness, Currency Exposure and Other Financial Matters
Our leverage may make it difficult for us to service our debt and operate our businesses.
We are leveraged with recurring debt service obligations and expect to continue to have comparable leverage for the foreseeable future. We may as wellalso incur more debt in the future. This may have negative consequences for our business and investors, including requiring that a substantial portion of the cash flows from our operations be dedicated to debt service obligations; reducing the availability of cash flows to fund internal growth through working capital, Capital Expenditures,capital expenditures, other general corporate purposes and payments of dividends; increasing our vulnerability to economic downturns in our industry; exposing us to interest rate increases on our existing indebtedness and indebtedness that we may incur in the future; placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt in relation to cash flows; limiting our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business and our industry; restricting us from pursuing strategic acquisitions or exploiting certain business opportunities; and limiting, among other things, our ability to borrow additional funds or raise equity capital in the future and increasing the costs of such additional financings.
If our future cash flows from operations and other capital resources are insufficient to pay our obligations as they mature or to fund our liquidity needs, we may be forced to reduce or delay our business activities and capital expenditures, sell assets, obtain additional debt or equity financing, restructure or refinance all or a portion of our debt on or before maturity or reduce our dividend. In the worst-case scenario, an actual or impending inability to pay debts as they become due and payable could result in our insolvency or an insolvency of one or more of our subsidiaries.
24



Restrictive covenants in our debt instruments may limit our ability to operate our business. Our failure to comply with these covenants, including as a result of events beyond our control, could result in an event of default that may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our current debt instruments impose some operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions include limitations on our ability to, among other things, merge or consolidate with other companies; sell, lease, transfer or dispose of assets; pay dividends, redeem share capital or redeem or reduce subordinated indebtedness; and make acquisitions or investments.
Our debt instruments contain covenants that may adversely affect our ability to finance our future operations and capital needs and to pursue available business opportunities. Our ability to comply with these provisions may be affected by changes in economic or business conditions or other events beyond our control. In addition, our debt instruments contain cross-default provisions such that a default under one particular financing arrangement could automatically trigger defaults under other financing arrangements and cause such indebtedness to become due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest. As a result, any default under an indebtedness to which we are party could result in a substantial loss to us and could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
A deterioration in our financial position or a downgrade of our ratings by a credit rating agency could increase our borrowing costs and our business relationships could be adversely affected.
A deterioration of our financial position or a downgrade of our credit ratings for any reason could increase our borrowing costs and have an adverse effect on our business relationships as well as on the payments and other terms agreeable with customers, suppliers and hedging counterparties. We may enter into various forms of hedging arrangements against currency, interest rate or oil price fluctuations. Financial strength and credit ratings are important to the availability and pricing of these hedging activities. As a result, any downgrade of our credit ratings may make it more costly for us to engage in these activities, and changes to our level of indebtedness may make it more difficult or costly for us to engage in these activities in the future.
In addition, a downgrade could adversely affect our existing financing, limit access to the capital or credit markets, or otherwise adversely affect the availability of other new financing on favorable terms, if at all, result in more restrictive covenants in agreements governing the terms of any future indebtedness that we incur, increase our borrowing costs, or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange and interest rates could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsflows.
We are exposed to market risks relating to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange and interest rates. Our results of operations may be affected by both the transaction effects and the translation effects of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. We are exposed to currency fluctuation when we convert currencies that we may receive for our products into currencies required to pay our debt, or into currencies in which we purchase raw materials, meet our fixed costs or pay for services, which could result in a gain or loss depending on fluctuations in exchange rates. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates could require us to reduce our prices to remain competitive in foreign markets. In each case, the relevant income or expense is reported in the relevant local currency and translated into U.S. Dollar at the applicable currency exchange rate for inclusion in our consolidated financial statements. Therefore, our financial results in any given period are materially affected by fluctuations in the value of the U.S. Dollar relative to other currencies, in particular the Euro, the Korean Won and Chinese Renminbi. Generally, a depreciation of Euro against the U.S. Dollar has a negative impact on (by increasing) our Net Working Capital, because a large part of our raw material are purchased by and held at entities using the Euro. In addition, 56.3%certain of our outstanding debt obligations are denominated, pay interest in and must be repaid in Euro (and certain of our future debt obligations may be denominated in Euro), and therefore expose us to additional exchange rate risks. An appreciation of the Euro would make our financing under Euro-denominated instruments more expensive. Significant changes in the value of the U.S. Dollar relative to the other currencies could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, weWe are also exposed to adverse changes in interest rates. We manage our foreign exchange risk through normal operating and financing activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the selective use of derivative transactions, the effectiveness of which is dependent, in part, upon the counterparties to
oec-20211231_g1.jpg17

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
these contracts honoring their financial obligations to us. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in reducing the risks inherent in exposures to foreign currency and interest rate fluctuations, and our financial results could be adversely affected.
From time to time, it may be necessary for us to enter into hedging arrangements to reduce the impact of price and exchange rate volatility. Unavailability or inefficiency of hedging could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In the past, we have entered into certain hedging arrangements to reduce the impact of raw material and energy price volatility as well as interest rate and currency exchange rate fluctuations. It may be necessary for us to enter into hedging arrangements in the future to reduce the impact of raw material or energy price volatility or currency and exchange rate fluctuation, which may or may not be effective. The use of derivative hedging instruments is generally dependent on the availability of adequate credit lines with appropriate financial institutions. As a result, we could be unable to use derivative financial instruments in the future, to the extent necessary or on commercially reasonable terms, and any hedging strategy we employ could therefore be adversely affected. The effectiveness of our derivative hedging instruments will also depend on the relevant hedging counterparties honoring their financial obligations. Any failure by a hedging counterparty to perform its obligations could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
25



Geopolitical events in the EU, and in particular ultimate future relations between the EU and UK following the “Brexit,” may impact the Euro and as a result, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
On February 1, 2020 the EU membership of United Kingdom (the “U.K.”) formally ceased, as a direct result of a referendum held on June 23, 2016 in the U.K. in which a majority voted to exit the EU. This referendum has come to be known as “Brexit”. At this time, the U.K.’s future relationship to the EU is not yet formally agreed upon. During a transition period until December 31, 2020 previously existing membership regulations remain effective. If no mutual agreements were to be reached by December 31, 2020, this could result in a considerable uncertainty as to the ongoing terms of the U.K’s relationship with the EU, including the terms of trade between the U.K. and the EU, and a likely negative impact on all parties. The Brexit vote has given rise to calls for the governments of other European Union member states to consider withdrawal. These developments, or the perception that any of them could occur, have caused and may continue to cause significant volatility in global financial markets as well as adversely affect the exchange rate of the Euro with respect to the U.S. Dollar, which as described under “—Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange and interest rates could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows” above, could have an adverse effect on us.
Political, social and economic uncertainty and changes arising from Brexit, may have a negative impact not only on the economy of the U.K. but also on the economies of non-U.K. EU and EEA countries and the overall stability of the Euro. Should the Euro dissolve entirely, the legal and contractual consequences for holders of Euro-denominated obligations and for parties subject to other contractual provisions referencing the Euro would be determined by laws in effect at such time. These potential developments, or market perceptions concerning these and related issues, could have adverse consequences for us with respect to our outstanding Euro-denominated debt obligations and, as we have a substantial amount of debt denominated in Euro, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
DislocationsDisruptions in credit and capital markets may make it more difficult for us and our suppliers and customers to borrow money or raise capital.
DislocationsDisruptions in the credit markets may result in less credit being made available by banks and other lending institutions. As a result, we may not be able to obtain financing for our business and acquisitions or to pursue other business plans or make necessary investments, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Furthermore, a number of our customers and suppliers rely on access to credit to adequately fund their operations, which may also be limited due to dislocations in the credit markets. The inability of our customers to obtain credit facilities or capital market financing may adversely affect our business by reducing our sales and increasing our exposure to bad debt, while the inability of our suppliers to access adequate financing may adversely affect our business by increasing prices for raw materials, energy and transportation.
In addition, payments received from customers that later enter into insolvency or comparable proceedings under applicable laws may be subject to claw back risks.
We may be required to impair or write off certain assets if our assumptions about future sales and profitability prove incorrect.
In analyzing the value of our inventory, property, plant and equipment, investments and intangible assets, we have made assumptions about future sales (prices and volume), costs and cash generation. These assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and, if the actual results differ significantly from these assumptions, we may not be able to realize the value of the assets recorded, which could lead to an impairment or write-off of certain of these assets and thatwhich could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be required to increase our pension fund contributions.
We have made pension commitments to our existing and some of our former employees. These commitments are partially covered by pension schemes, pension and benevolent funds and insurance policies some of which are maintained by previous employers. The amount of obligations is based on certain actuarial assumptions, including discount factors, life expectancy, pension trends and future salary development as well as expected interest rates applicable to the plan assets. Actual results deviating from these assumptions could result in a considerable increase of our pension commitments and liabilities and higher allocations to the pension reserves in future years, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. For a more detailed description of our defined benefit plans see our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this report.
Our insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover all the risks we may face and it may be difficult to obtain replacement insurance on acceptable terms or at all.
Our plants, equipment and other assets are insured for property damage and business interruption risks, and our business as a whole is insured for public and products liability risks as well as certain bad debt losses in Europe under insurance policies with reputable insurance companies. We believe these insurance policies are generally in accordance with customary industry practices, including deductibles and coverage limits. However, we cannot be fully insured against all potential hazards incident to our business, including losses resulting from war risks or terrorist acts, or all potential losses, including damage to our reputation. If we were to incur a significant
26



liability for which we were not fully insured, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
As a result of market conditions, premiums and deductibles for certain insurance policies can increase substantially and, in some instances, certain insurance may become unavailable at a reasonable cost or available only for certain risks. We can provide no assurances that we would be able to obtain replacement insurance on acceptable terms or at all.
Significant changes in our jurisdictional earnings mix or in the tax laws of those jurisdictions, as well as changes in their interpretation, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our future tax rates may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including the enactment of new tax legislation, such as the U.S. tax reform, other changes in tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws, changes in the estimated realization of our net deferred tax assets (arising, among other things, from tax loss carry forwards and the Acquisition)acquisition of the carbon black business line from Evonik Industries AG, completed on July 29, 2011 (“Acquisition”)), the jurisdictions in which profits are determined to be earned and taxed, adjustments to estimated taxes upon finalization
oec-20211231_g1.jpg18

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
of various tax returns, increases in expenses that are not deductible for tax purposes, including write-offs of acquired in process R&D and impairment of goodwill in connection with acquisitions, changes in available tax credits and additional tax or interest payments resulting from tax audits with various tax authorities. Losses for which no tax benefits can be recorded could materially impact our tax rate and its volatility from period to period. Any significant change in our jurisdictional earnings mix or in the tax laws in those jurisdictions, as well as changes in their interpretation, could increase our tax rates and adversely affect our financial results in those periods.
Our agreements with Evonik in connection with the Acquisition require us to indemnify Evonik with respect to certain aspects of our business and require Evonik to indemnify us for certain retained liabilities. We cannot offer assurance that we will be able to enforce claims under these indemnities as we expect.
In connection with the Acquisition, we agreed to indemnify Evonik with respect to future liabilities related to our business and Evonik agreed to indemnify us, subject to certain limitations, for certain liabilities that it agreed to retain. Our potential exposure for such liabilities could be significant. There can be no assurance that we will be able to enforce our claims under the indemnity from Evonik. Even if we ultimately succeed in recovering from Evonik any amounts for which we are held liable, we may be temporarily required to bear these losses ourselves. In addition, our ability to enforce claims under our indemnity from Evonik is dependent on Evonik’s creditworthiness at the time we seek to enforce these claims, and there can be no assurance as to what Evonik’s financial condition will be in the future. In particular, the agreement with Evonik provides for a partial indemnity from Evonik against various exposures, including, but not limited to, capital investments, fines and costs arising in connection with Clean Air Act violations that occurred prior to July 29, 2011. Almost all of the allegations made by the EPA with regard to Company’s U.S. facilities relate to alleged violations before July 29, 2011. The indemnity provides for a recovery from Evonik of a share of the costs (including fines), expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees, but excluding costs for maintenance and control in the ordinary course of business and any internal cost of monitoring the remedy), liabilities, damages and losses suffered and is subject to various contractual provisions including provisions set forth in the Share Purchase Agreement with Evonik, such as a de minimis clause, a basket, overall caps (which apply to all covered exposures and all covered environmental exposures, in the aggregate), damage mitigation and cooperating requirements, as well as a statute of limitations provision. Due to the cost-sharing and cap provisions in Evonik’s indemnity, we expect that substantial costs we will incur in the EPA enforcement initiative and its respective settlement could exceed the scope of the indemnity in the tens of millions of dollars. In addition, Evonik has signaled that it may likely defend itself against claims under the indemnity; while we intend to enforce our rights vigorously and we have initiated arbitration proceedings, there is no assurance that we will be able to recover costs or expenditures incurred under the indemnity as we expect or at all.
We could experience a material adverse effect on our financial condition if the tax authorities were to successfully challenge decisions and assumptions we have made in assessing and complying with our tax obligations.
We make, and have in the past made, numerous decisions and assumptions in assessing and complying with our tax obligations, including in respect of the tax treatment of the separation of our business from Evonik, the Acquisition, assumptions regarding the tax deductibility of certain interest expenses under German tax regulations, the upholding and recognition of our German tax group and the applicability of the regulations to our business as a group headquartered by a Luxembourg company. Many of the tax laws that apply to us, including tax laws that apply to the separation of our business from Evonik and the Acquisition, are complex and often require judgments to be made when the law is unclear, or the facts are uncertain. While we believe the decisions we have made and the assumptions and practices we have applied are reasonable and accurate, we cannot guarantee that these decisions, assumptions and practices will not be questioned or rejected by the tax authorities. In particular, we are subject to tax audits for the period in which the Acquisition occurred by tax authorities in multiple jurisdictions worldwide, and in many cases these audits have not yet begun or have not been completed and could give rise to issues of this kind. If these tax authorities were to successfully challenge such decisions or assumptions, we could be required to pay additional amounts to such authorities to satisfy our tax obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In particular, the German tax authorities are conducting their first audit of Orion Engineered Carbons GmbH following the Acquisition. Currently, we are unable to assess when this audit will be completed or the possible outcome of this audit. While currently we do not believe this audit will have a material adverse impact on our financial position, it could raise one or more issues of the kind referenced above.
27



Risks Related to Ownership of our Common Shares
Business dynamics and exchange rate fluctuations may reduce the amount of U.S. Dollars shareholders receive in respect of any dividends or other distributions we may pay in the future in connection with our common shares.
Under Luxembourg law, the determination of whether we have sufficient distributable profits to pay dividends is made on the basis of our unconsolidated annual financial statements prepared under the Luxembourg Company Law in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Luxembourg and in Euros. Exchange rate fluctuations may affect the amount in Euro that we are able to distribute, and the amount in U.S. Dollars that our shareholders receive upon the payment of cash dividends or other distributions if we declare and pay in Euro, if any. Such fluctuations could adversely affect the value of our common shares, and, in turn, the U.S. Dollar proceeds that holders receive from the sale of our common shares.
We cannot assure investors that we will continue to pay dividends on our common shares at historical rates or at all.
Our ability to continue to pay dividends on our common shares at historical rates, or at all, is generally dependent on a proposal by our Board of Directors subject to the discretion ofapproval by our board of directorsshareholders and will depend on a number of factors, including, among others, our financial condition and results of future operations, growth opportunities and restrictive covenants in our debt instruments. If we do not maintain or periodically increase the dividend on our common shares, it may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common shares.

Failure to maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley could have a material adverse effect on our business and share price.
As a public company, we are required to document and test our internal control over financial reporting in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”), which requires, an annual report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and a report by our independent registered public accounting firm that addresses the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. During this process, we may identify deficiencies that we may not be able to remediate in a timely manner to meet our deadline for compliance with Section 404 or that constitute a material weakness, which could require a restatement or other revision of our financial statements. Testing and maintaining internal control could divert our management’s attention from other matters that are important to the operation of our business, increase our legal and financial compliance costs and make some management activities more difficult, time consuming and costly. We may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 or our independent registered public accounting firm may not issue an unqualified report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In such an event, we could not be certain that our financial statements will be accurate and investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, which would likely have a negative effect on the trading price of our common shares. In addition, if we do not maintain effective internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial information on a timely basis, which could harm the trading price of our common shares, impair our ability to raise additional capital, or jeopardize our stock exchange listing.
If securities or industry analysts do not continue to publish research or reports about our business, or if they adversely change their recommendations regarding our common shares, the market price and trading volume of our common shares could decline.
The trading market for our common shares will be influenced by research or reports that industry or securities analysts publish about our business. If one or more analysts who cover us downgrade our common shares, the market price for our common shares would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease to cover us or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which, in turn, could cause the market price or trading volume for our common shares to decline.

We are required to comply with the Exchange Act’s domestic reporting regime.

We lost our “foreign private issuer” status as such term is defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act. As a result, as of January 1, 2020, we are required to comply with the Exchange Act reporting and other requirements applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, which are more detailed and extensive than the requirements for foreign private issuers. We have been required to make changes in our corporate governance practices in accordance with various SEC and NYSE rules. In addition, our officers and directors are no longer exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and related rules with respect to their purchase and sales of our securities. Our loss of foreign private issuer status caused transitory costs, may increase our legal and financial compliance costs in the future and has made some activities highly time consuming and costly.
The rights of our shareholders may differ from the rights they would have as shareholders of a U.S. corporation, which could adversely affect trading in our common shares and our ability to conduct equity financings.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our Articles of Association and the laws of Luxembourg, including the Luxembourg Company Law (loi du 10 août 1915 concernant les sociétés commerciales, telle quelle a été modifiée).Law. The rights of our shareholders and the responsibilities of our directors and officers under Luxembourg law are different from those applicable to a corporation incorporated in the United States.U.S. Luxembourg laws may not be as extensive as those in effect in the United States,U.S., and Luxembourg law and regulations in respect of corporate governance matters might not be as protective of minority shareholders as state corporation laws in the United States.
28



U.S. As a result, our shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in connection with actions taken by our directors and officers than they would as shareholders of a corporation incorporated in the United States.U.S.
We are organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and it may be difficult to obtain or enforce judgments or bring original actions against us or the members of our Board of Directors in the United States.
We are organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the majority of our assets are located outside the United States.U.S. Furthermore, some of the members of our Board of Directors and officers reside outside the United StatesU.S. and a substantial portion of their assets are located outside the United States.U.S. Investors may not be able to effect service of process within the United StatesU.S. upon us or these persons or to enforce judgments obtained against us or these persons in U.S. courts, including judgments in actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws.courts. Likewise, it may also be difficult for an investor to enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained against us or these persons in courts located in jurisdictions outside the United States,U.S., including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. Awards of punitive damages in actions brought in the United StatesU.S. or elsewhere are generally not enforceable in Luxembourg.
As there is no treaty in force on the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters between the United StatesU.S. and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, courts in Luxembourg will not automatically recognize and enforce a final judgment rendered by a U.S. court. The enforceability in Luxembourg courts of judgments rendered by U.S. courts will be subject prior to any enforcement in Luxembourg, to the procedure and the conditions set forth in the Luxembourg procedural code, which conditions may include the following as of the date of this report (which may change):code.
the judgment of the U.S. court is final and enforceable (exécutoire) in the United States;
the U.S. court had jurisdiction over the subject matter leading to the judgment (that is, its jurisdiction was in compliance both with Luxembourg private international law rules and with the applicable domestic U.S. federal or state jurisdictional rules);
the U.S. court applied to the dispute the substantive law that would have been applied by Luxembourg courts (based on recent case law and legal doctrine, it is not certain that this condition would still be required for enforcement (exequatur) to be granted by a Luxembourg court);
the judgment was granted following proceedings where the counterparty had the opportunity to appear and, if it appeared, to present a defense, and the decision of the foreign court must not have been obtained by fraud, but in compliance with the rights of the defendant;
the U.S. court acted in accordance with its own procedural laws; and
the decisions and the considerations of the U.S. court must not be contrary to Luxembourg international public policy rules or have been given in proceedings of a tax or criminal nature or rendered subsequent to an evasion of Luxembourg law (fraude à la loi). Awards of damages made under civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws, or other laws, which are classified by Luxembourg courts as being of a penal or punitive nature (for example, fines or punitive damages), might not be recognized by Luxembourg courts. Ordinarily, an award of monetary damages would not be considered as a penalty, but if the monetary damages include punitive damages, such punitive damages may be considered a penalty.
In addition, actions brought in a Luxembourg court against us or the members of our Board of Directors and our officers to enforce liabilities based on U.S. federal securities laws may be subject to certain restrictions. In particular, Luxembourg courts generally do not award punitive damages. Litigation in Luxembourg is also subject to rules of procedure that differ from the U.S. rules, including with respect to the taking and admissibility of evidence, the conduct of the proceedings and the allocation of costs. For these reasons, it may be difficult for a U.S. investor to bring an original action in a Luxembourg court predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us, the members of our Board of Directors or our officers. In addition, even if a judgment is obtained against our company,Company, the non-U.S. members of our Board of Directors or our officers based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws, a U.S. investor may not be able to enforce it in U.S. or Luxembourg courts.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg19

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Under our Articles of Association, we may indemnify our directors for and hold them harmless against all claims, actions, suits or proceedings brought against them, subject to limited exceptions. The right to indemnification does not exist in the case of gross negligence, fraud or wrongful misconduct. The rights and obligations among or between us and any of our current or former directors and officers are generally governed by the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and are subject to the jurisdiction of the Luxembourg courts, unless such rights or obligations do not relate to or arise out of such persons’ capacities listed above. Although there is doubt as to whether U.S. courts would enforce this indemnification provision in an action brought in the United StatesU.S. under U.S. federal or state securities laws, this provision could make judgments obtained outside Luxembourg more difficult to enforce against our assets in Luxembourg or in jurisdictions that would apply Luxembourg law.
Luxembourg and European insolvency and bankruptcy laws are substantially different from U.S. insolvency laws and may offer our shareholders less protection than they would have under U.S. insolvency and bankruptcy laws.
As a joint stock corporation organized under the laws of Luxembourg with its registered office in Luxembourg, weWe are subject to Luxembourg insolvency and bankruptcy laws in the event any insolvency proceedings are initiated against us including, among other things, Council Regulation (EC) No. 1346/2000 of May 29, 2000 on insolvency proceedings.laws. Should courts in another European country
29



determine that the insolvency and bankruptcy laws of that country apply to us in accordance with and subject to such EU regulations, the courts in that country could have jurisdiction over the insolvency proceedings initiated against us. Insolvency and bankruptcy laws in Luxembourg or the relevant other European country, if any, may offer our shareholders less protection than they would have under U.S. insolvency and bankruptcy laws and make it more difficult for them to recover the amount they could expect to recover in a liquidation under U.S. insolvency and bankruptcy laws.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None
Item 2. Properties
Production Facilities
We currently operate a global platform of 13 wholly owned production facilities in Europe, North and South America, Asia and South Africa, and three sales companies, as well as one jointly-owned production plantfacility at Dortmund, in Germany. AllMost of our production plantsfacilities are ISO 9001, (Quality Management)Quality Management and ISO 14001, (Environmental Management)Environmental Management certified. Our global production capacity totaled approximately 1,275 kmt in 2019, of which 420 kmt was in Europe, 375 kmt was in North America, 245 kmt in South Korea, 95 kmt was in Brazil, 75 kmt was in China, 65 kmt was in South Africa, and the capacity of the German JV proportionate to our shareholding. We estimate that our average plant utilization rate was 91% in 2019.
The following map provides an overview of the geographical footprint of our production network, including a jointly-owned production facility at Dortmund, in Germany, as of December 31, 2019.oec-20191231_g1.jpg2021:
oec-20211231_g2.jpg
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
20

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Item 3. Legal Proceedings    
We become involved from time to time in various claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of our business, such as product related claims, liability claims, employment related claims and asbestos litigation, against some of which we have limited indemnification from Evonik under the agreements relating to the Acquisition.litigation. Some matters involve claims for large amounts of damages as well as other relief. With respect to our settlement of the EPA’s enforcement initiative and the settled arbitration proceedings with Evonik related to respectively limited indemnities please seeItem 1. Business—Environmental,
30



Health8. Financial Statements and Safety Matters—Environmental—Environmental ProceedingsSupplementary Data, Note Q. Commitments and Contingencies. .” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Legal and Regulatory Matter—Litigation or legal proceedings could expose us to significant liabilities and thus adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.” as well as “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Legal and Regulatory Matter—We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights successfully.We believe, based on currently available information, that the results of the proceedings referenced above, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, but may be material to our operating results and cash flow for any particular period when the relevant costs are incurred. We note that the outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain, and we offer no assurances as to the outcome of any of these current or future matters or their effect on the Company.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable    
 




PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)(“NYSE”) under the symbol “OEC”.
As of February 18, 2020, the closing price14, 2022, there were approximately 10 record holders of our common stock on the NYSE was $16.20, and we had seven stockholders of record.stock.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019,2021, we did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act.
From time to time, we may repurchase our common stock in the open market pursuant to programs approved by our Board. During 2019,the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock.
The information required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement (as defined in Item 10 below) under the heading “EquityEquity Compensation Plan Information at December 31, 2019.2021.

Dividend Policy
In accordance with the Luxembourg Company Law, the general meeting of shareholders has the power to make a resolution on the payment of dividends upon the recommendation of the Board of Directors. In deciding whether to recommend any future dividend, the Board of Directors would take into account any legal or contractual limitation, our actual and anticipated future earnings, cash flows, debt service and capital requirements, our business plans and such other matters as the Board of Directors believes appropriate, in its discretion. Generally, any dividend approved by a general meeting of shareholders would be paid out shortly after the meeting.
During the fiscal year 2019, our board of directors declared dividends of $0.80 per common share, equivalent to a total distribution of $48.0 million. The dividends were paid in quarterly installments at $0.20 per share. Luxembourg withholding tax at a rate of 15% wasis deducted from the dividends,dividend payments, subject to certain exemptions and reductions in certain circumstances.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
On October 29, 2021, our board of directors declared an interim dividend in the aggregate amount of $1.25 million, which is equivalent to approximately $0.0207 per common stock. The following tables set forth selected historical financial information for fiscal years 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015 andinterim dividend was paid on January 12, 2022, to holders of record as of December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016the close of business on January 5, 2022.
There can be no assurance that any dividends or distributions will be declared or paid in the future.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg21

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Performance Graph
The performance graph and 2015. The financialthe information for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 and balance sheet information as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewherecontained in this report. The financial information for fiscal year 2016 and balance sheet information as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report for the year ended 2018 on Form 20-F,section is not “soliciting material,” is being furnished, not filed, with the SEC. SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
The financial information for fiscal year 2015 has been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements converted to U.S. GAAP and into U.S. Dollars. This information should be read in conjunctiongraph below matches the cumulative 5-year total return of holders of Orion Engineered Carbons LLC's common stock with the consolidated financial statementscumulative total returns of the S&P Smallcap 600 index and S&P Small Cap Chemicals index. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock, in each index, and in the peer group (including reinvestment of dividends) was $100 on 12/31/2016 and tracks it through 12/31/2021.
oec-20211231_g3.jpg
201620172018201920202021
Orion Engineered Carbons LLC$100.00 $140.73 $142.86 $113.67 $102.76 $110.07 
S&P Smallcap 600100.00113.23103.63127.24141.60179.58
S&P Small Cap Chemicals Index100.00118.6092.29100.41122.41150.69
The stock price performance included elsewhere in this report, the related notes and other financial information included herein, and financial information previously filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
22


Consolidated Statements of Operations DataYear Ended December 31,
20192018201720162015
(In millions, except per share amounts) 
Net sales$1,476.4  $1,578.2  $1,328.3  $1,139.3  $1,234.5  
Cost of sales1,086.6  1,148.2  950.7  764.9  879.4  
Gross profit389.7  430.0  377.6  374.4  355.1  
Selling, general and administrative expenses206.9  231.9  207.5  202.5  188.8  
Research and development costs19.9  20.3  18.2  16.1  14.8  
Other expenses, net12.2  6.1  7.6  9.0  15.7  
Restructuring income0.0  40.3  —  —  —  
Restructuring expenses3.6  15.6  6.5  30.0  —  
Income from operations147.2  196.3  137.9  116.8  135.8  
Interest and other financial expense, net27.6  28.6  44.1  43.3  62.1  
Reclassification of actuarial losses from AOCI—  —  9.7  0.1  10.5  
Income from operations before income tax expense and equity in earnings of affiliated companies119.6  167.7  84.0  73.4  63.2  
Income tax expense33.2  46.9  19.7  24.4  23.1  
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax0.6  0.6  0.5  0.5  0.5  
Net income$86.9  $121.3  $64.9  $49.5  $40.6  
Earnings per share - basic$1.45  $2.04  $1.09  $0.83  $0.68  
Earnings per share - diluted$1.42  $1.99  $1.07  $0.82  $0.68  
Dividends per share$0.80  $0.80  $0.77  $0.74  $0.74  



Statement of Cash Flows DataYear Ended December 31,
20192018201720162015
(In millions) 
Net cash provided by operating activities$231.5  $122.0  $147.7  $177.4  $195.1  
Net cash used in investing activities(155.8) (88.1) (90.3) (68.5) (83.0) 
Net cash used in financing activities(68.6) (43.8) (68.5) (101.8) (112.3) 

33



Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Balance Sheet DataYear Ended December 31,

20192018201720162015
(In millions) 
Cash and cash equivalents$63.7  $57.0  $72.3  $77.9  $71.1  
Property, plant and equipment534.1  483.5  462.1  409.9  420.1  
Total assets1,257.4  1,273.0  1,164.4  1,055.5  1,057.6  
Total liabilities1,071.4  1,114.1  1,069.1  1,000.8  1,004.9  
Total stockholders' equity(1)
186.0  158.9  95.3  54.7  52.7  
(1) Our share capital as of December 31, 2019 is denominated in Euro and was €60,729,289 (a USD-equivalent amount of $68,223,283, respectively, applying a closing rate of 1.1234 US-Dollar per 1 Euro), represented by 60,729,289 common shares with no par value of which 505,142 common shares are held in treasury.
The following tables present a reconciliation of the non-GAAP measure Adjusted EBITDA to net income (See Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for further details on non-GAAP measures):
Reconciliation of profit or (loss)Year Ended December 31,
20192018201720162015
(In millions) 
Net income$86.9  $121.3  $64.9  $49.5  $40.6  
Add back income tax expense33.2  46.9  19.7  24.4  23.1  
Add back equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax(0.6) (0.6) (0.5) (0.5) (0.5) 
Income from operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of affiliated companies119.6  167.7  84.0  73.4  63.2  
Add back interest and other financial expense, net27.6  28.6  44.1  43.3  62.1  
Reclassification of actuarial losses from AOCI—  —  9.7  0.1  10.5  
Income from operations147.2  196.3  137.9  116.8  135.8  
Add back depreciation, amortization and impairment of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment96.7  98.2  98.4  97.1  80.9  
EBITDA243.9  294.5  236.2  214.0  216.7  
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax0.6  0.6  0.5  0.5  0.5  
Restructuring expenses/(income)3.6  (24.6) 6.5  19.8  —  
Consulting fees related to Company strategy3.0  4.8  2.8  2.8  1.6  
Long term incentive plan9.4  13.9  8.8  4.0  1.0  
Other adjustments6.8  5.0  2.1  5.7  11.7  
Adjusted EBITDA$267.3  $294.1  $257.0  $246.7  $231.6  

34



Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis summarizessummarize the significant factors affecting our results of operations and financial condition during the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 and should be read in conjunction with the information included under Item 1. Business and Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data included elsewhere in this Annual Report. We prepare our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP” or “U.S. GAAP”) and in USU.S. Dollars.
This section discusses year-to-year comparisons between 2021 and 2020. For discussions on year-to-year comparison between 2020 and 2019, refer to Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report in Form 10-K, which was filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 18, 2021.
Overview
In 2019, we generated revenue of $1,476.42021, our net sales was $1,546.8 million, on a volume of 1,023.2sales volumes was 964.3 kmt, a net income of $86.9was $134.7 million, and Adjusted EBITDA of $267.3was $268.4 million. Adjusted EBITDA for our
Specialty Carbon Black segmentSegment—Adjusted EBITDA was $122.2$148.4 million, and the Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margin was 24.0%24.8%. This segment accounted for 34.4%38.7% of our total revenue, 45.7%55.3% of total Adjusted EBITDA and 24.3%27.3% of our total volume in kmt in 2019. Adjusted EBITDA for our 2021.
Rubber Carbon Black segmentSegment—Adjusted EBITDA was $145.2$120.0 million, and Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margin was 15.0%12.7%. This segment accounted for 65.6%61.3% of our total revenue, 54.3%44.7% of total Adjusted EBITDA and 75.7%72.7% of our total volume in kmt in 2019.2021.
Key Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations
We believe that certain factors have had, and will continue to have, a material effect on our results of operations and financial condition. As many of these factors are beyond our control and certain of these factors have historically been volatile, past performance will not necessarily be indicative of future performance and it is difficult to predict future performance with any degree of certainty. In addition, important factors that could cause our actual results of operations or financial conditions to differ materially from those expressed or implied below, include, but are not limited to, factors indicated under “Item 1A. Risk Factors”, and Note Regarding Forward-Looking StatementsCautionary Statement for the Purposes of the “Safe Harbor” Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995ofelsewhere in this report.Annual Report.
Recent Developments and Certain Known Trends
General Economic Conditions, Cyclicality and Seasonality
Our results ofIn 2021, our business saw a strong rebound in operations arecompared to fiscal 2020 which was adversely affected by worldwide economic conditions. Because carbon black is used in a diverse group of end products,the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite demand for carbon black has historically been related to real GDP and general global economic conditions. In particular, a large part of our sales has direct exposure to the cyclical automotive industry and, to a lesser extent, the construction industry. As a result, our results of operations experience a level of inherent cyclicality. The nature of our business and our large fixed asset base make it difficult to rapidly adjust our fixed costs downward when demandimprovement for our products declines, which materially affects our results of operations.
Our business is generally not seasonalduring 2021, COVID-19 pandemic infection rate remains high in nature, although we may experience some regional seasonal declines during holiday periods and our results of operations are generally weaker in the last three monthsmany parts of the year.
Drivers of Demand
Besides general global economic conditions, certain specific drivers of demand for carbon black differ among our operating segments. Specialty carbon black has a wide variety of end-uses and demand is largely driven by the development of the coatings, polymers and printing industries. Demand for specialty carbon black in the coatings and polymers industries is mainly influenced by the levels of industrialization, automobile OEM demand, infrastructure, consumer goods and construction. Demand for specialty carbon black in the printing industry is mainly influenced by developments in print media and packaging materials. Demand for rubber carbon black is largely driven by the development of the tire and mechanical rubber goods industries. Demand for rubber carbon black in tires is mainly influenced by the number of replacement and original equipment tires produced, which in turn is driven by (i) vehicle trends, including the number of vehicles produced and registered, and the number of miles driven, (ii) demand for high-performance tires, (iii) demand for larger vehicles, such as trucks and buses and (iv) changes in regulatory requirements. Demand for rubber carbon black in mechanical rubber goods is mainly influenced by vehicle trends, construction activity and general industrial production.
Demand in the developed West European and North American regions is mainly driven by demographic changes, customers’ high-quality requirements, stringent tire regulation standards and relatively stable tire replacement demand. Demand in emerging markets, such as China, Southeastern Asia, South America and Eastern Europe, is mainly driven by the growing middle class, rapid industrialization, new infrastructure spending and increasing car ownership trends. The growth in vehicle production in turn drives demand for both original equipment tire manufacturing and replacement tires in developing regions.
Asset Utilization
Margins in the carbon black industry, and the chemical industry generally, are strongly influenced by industry capacity utilization. As demand for products approaches available supply, utilization rates rise, and prices and margins typically increase over time. Historically, this relationship has been highly cyclical, due to fluctuations in supply resulting from the timing of new investments in capacity and general economic conditions affecting the relative strength or weakness of demand. Generally, capacity is more likely to be added in periods when current or expected future demand is strong and margins are, or are expected to be, high. Investments in new capacity can result, and in the past frequently have resulted, in over-capacity, which typically leads to a reduction of margins. For example, some of our customers have shifted, and may continue to shift, manufacturing capacity from mature regions, such as North America and Europe, to emerging regions, such as Asia and South America. Consequently, competitors in China have added capacity (particularly regarding production of standard tire grades), at far greater proportion than demand has risen, which resulted in pressured margins in the region. In response, producers typically reduce capacity utilization or limit further capacity additions, eventually causing the industry to be relatively undersupplied. In recent years,
35



a systematic reduction in capacity in North America and Europe, together with increased manufacturing efficiencies, has enabled us to largely preserve margins and maintain high utilization rates.
Although utilization levels can differ significantly by plant, these levels tend to be driven more by variations in demand from specific customers served by each plant rather than by general trends in the region where the plant is located. We estimate our average plant utilization rate to have been at approximately 91% in 2019, approximately 91% in 2018 and approximately 90% in 2017. We have made recent investments in strategic sites to increase the flexibility of our production platform and closed production facilities in Europe and South Korea in order to consolidate capacities in the European and Asian regions. Both actions allow us to opportunistically upgrade and expand our capacity to produce higher margin products, as demand allows, and positions us better to shift additional production capacity to specialty carbon black products and rubber carbon black for higher-end mechanical rubber goods. We intend to achieve further growth in production volume, as customer demand allows, by improving utilization rates, improving the availability of our assets by minimizing planned and unplanned facility downtime and improving the capacity of our assets through systematic supply chain planning and improved operating technologies. In addition a new specialty carbon black line is under construction at our Ravenna (Italy) plant, which is expected to commence production in 2021. Unplanned outages can impact our operating results. Similarly, planned or unplanned outages of our competitors can positively affect our operating results by decreasing the product supply in the industry.
Raw Material and Energy Costs
Our results of operations are affected, directly and indirectly, by fluctuations in raw material and energy prices. Our manufacturing processes consume significant amounts of raw materials and energy, the costs of which are subject to fluctuations in worldwide supply and demand, in addition to other factors beyond our control. In 2019, raw materials accounted for approximately 75% of our cost of sales. Approximately 79% of the cost of raw material used in the production of carbon black is related to petroleum-based or coal-based feedstock known as carbon black oil, with some limited use of other raw materials, such as acetylene, nitrogen tetroxide, hydrogen and natural gas. The pricing of carbon black oil is typically indexed to the price of fuel oil. In general, we benchmark against Platts indices in the sourcing regions e.g. USGC, New York, Rotterdam and Singapore. In some areas the Gasoil index is used. While the majority of our purchases are based on underlying fuel oil indices, the ultimate carbon black oil price also depends on carbon black oil specific quality characteristics, differentials (premiums or discounts to Platts indices), freight costs and region-specific supply and demand as well as regulatory factors. Carbon black oil procurement is an important factor in achieving best-in-class production costs. Approximately 50% of our carbon black oil supply is covered by short- and long-term contracts with a wide variety of suppliers.
A significant portion of approximately 75% of our volume is sold based on formula-driven price adjustment mechanisms for changes in costs of raw materials, Sales prices under our non-indexed contracts are reviewed regularly with a view to reflecting raw material and energy price fluctuations as overall market conditions allow. In addition, there can be no guarantee that we will be able to timely adjust prices under our non-indexed contracts in the future, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—We are subject to volatility in the costs, quality and availability of raw materials and energy,world, which could decrease our production volumes and margins and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Costs for raw materials and energy have fluctuated significantly and may continue to fluctuate in the future. We believe that our contracts enableimpact demand. Other factors impacting us generally to maintain our Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margins, however, rapid and significant oil or energy price fluctuations have had and are likely to continue to have significant and varying effects on our earnings and results of operations, partly because oil price changes affect our sales prices and our cost of raw materials and energy at different times and amounts, and partly due to other factors, such as differentials affecting the ultimate carbon black oil price paid by us (versus a particular reference price index), actual carbon black oil usage amounts and our ongoing efficiency initiatives. As a result of the significant decline in oil prices in particular in 2014, we have seen one or more of these factors come into play at different times and adversely affect our profitability, and this is likely to be seen again in future periods of a declining oil pricing environment. It is also possible that in this environment, other factors come into play and interact adversely with our longer-term formula-based customer pricing arrangements. It is difficult to predict the impact of these factors going forward. In general, our customer pricing arrangements, and in particular the price adjustment formulas, are designed to protect us against rising or higher oil prices, and while we may seek to adjust them to accommodate the current environment, they may be difficult to change quickly, and if changed, may not be as protective if and when oil prices begin to rise.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuations
Our results of operations and Net Working Capital are affected by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Our exposure to foreign currencies comes from three main sources: (i) currency translation, when we translate results of our subsidiaries denominated in local functional currencies into U.S. Dollar, (ii) commercial transactions, such as when we contract purchases of our feedstock, which are mostly in U.S. Dollars, at non-U.S.-Dollar entities and (iii) financing transactions, as a large portion of our financial obligations are denominated in U.S. Dollars, some of which are hedged. In 2019, 40%, 27% and 16% of our net sales were generated by our subsidiaries whose functional currency is the Euro, the U.S. Dollar and the Korean Won, respectively, with the remainder in other currencies. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates could require us to reduce our prices to remain competitive in foreign regions. In each case, the relevant income or expense is reported in the respective local currency and translated into U.S. Dollar at the applicable currency exchange rate for inclusion in our consolidated financial information. Therefore, our financial results in any given period are materially affected by fluctuations in the value of the U.S. Dollar relative to other currencies, in particular the Euro and the Korean Won. Our foreign currency transaction exposure is partially offset by costs and expenses incurred by our subsidiaries in their local functional currencies.
The pricing of carbon black oil, our main raw material, is linked to the price of heavy fuel oil and is generally benchmarked against Platts indices of three regions: the U.S. Gulf Coast, Rotterdam and Singapore. Most of our carbon black oil purchase contracts are
36



denominated in U.S. Dollars. Generally, an appreciation of the U.S. Dollar has a negative impact on our results of operations and Net Working Capital, because our raw material purchases in U.S. Dollars may not be fully offset by our ability to pass-through changes inhigh raw material costs, to customers and by the translation effectavailability and costs of our results of operations outside the United States.global transportation.
We manage our foreign currency exchange exposure through the use of derivative instruments to economically hedge on balance sheet foreign currency denominated receivables and payables. In May 2018, we entered into a $235 million cross-currency swap to hedge interest rate risk and foreign currency exposure related to the U.S. Dollar-denominated Term Loan entered into by our German entity. In conjunction therewith we discontinued the use of the U.S. Dollar-denominated portion of our Term loan to hedge our U.S. operations. See “Item 8.—Financial Statements—Note K. Derivatives. We use customary products to manage other foreign exchange risk, including forward exchange contracts and currency options. We do not generally use foreign exchange hedging for expected exposure, as our expected exposure from sales is largely offset by our expected exposure from purchases.
Current and Future Environmental Regulations
Our operations are subject to extensive environmental laws and regulations, which require us to invest significant financial and technical resources to maintain compliance with applicable requirements. If environmental harm is found to have occurred as a result of our current or historical operations, we may incur significant remediation costs at current or former production facilities or third-party sites and may have to pay fines and damages. Many of our facilities have a long history of operation and have never been the subject of comprehensive environmental investigations. As a result, our environmental compliance and remediation costs could increase. Future closure and decommissioning at any one of these facilities, or of process units at these facilities, could result in significant remediation costs. For instance, many of our facilities have onsite landfills, storage tanks, wastewater treatment systems, ponds and other units that have been in use for a number of years, and we may incur significant costs when closing these units in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and when addressing related contamination of soil and groundwater. For more information about information requests made by the EPA to, and alleged violations of the U.S. Clean Air Act by, certain of our facilities located in the United States, see “Item 1.—Business—Environmental, Health and Safety Matters—Environmental—Environmental Proceedings.”
Changes to environmental regulations or laws that may affect previously unregulated aspects of our business may also require us to incur significant compliance costs. New regulations requiring further reductions of GHG and other emissions are being considered in Europe, the United States, China, Brazil and South Korea. Our carbon black operations may generate more CO2 than is permitted under current or future allocation schemes for GHG emissions, requiring us either to purchase emission credits or to modify our production processes to reduce emissions. Additionally, nano-scale materials, including carbon black, are under increased and ongoing scrutiny in multiple jurisdictions, including the European Union, and are likely to be subject to stricter regulation in the future, which may require us to incur significant costs in order to comply with new laws and requirements. Further, carbon black has been classified by certain national and international health organizations as a possible or suspected human carcinogen. A negative reclassification of carbon black by these organizations, or similar classifications of carbon black or other finished products, raw materials or intermediates by other organizations or governmental authorities could adversely affect our compliance costs, operations, sales and reputation.
Environmental considerations can also affect the industries in which we operate, including our position with respect to our competitors. For example, new tire labeling regulatory requirements globally (particularly in Europe) are expected to reduce the threat of low-cost tire imports significantly and to favorably affect demand in developed regions.
In connection with the Acquisition, Evonik agreed, subject to certain deductibles, caps, exclusions and procedural requirements, to indemnify us for certain historical environmental liabilities. See “Item 1A.—Risk Factors—Risks Related to Indebtedness, Currency Exposure and Other Financial Matters—Our Agreements with Evonik in connection with the Acquisition require us to indemnify Evonik with respect to certain aspects of our business and require Evonik to indemnify us for certain retained liabilities. We cannot offer assurance that we will be able to enforce claims under these indemnities as we expect.”
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of our financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We consider an accounting estimate to be critical to the financial statements if (i) the estimate is complex in nature or requires a high degree of judgment and (ii) different estimates and assumptions were used, the results could have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. We evaluate our estimates and application of our policies on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience, current conditions and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The policies that we believe are critical to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are the following:
Revenue and expense recognition;
Goodwill;
Valuation of intangibles acquired in a business combination
Inventories;
37



Pension provisions;
Deferred taxes, current income taxes;
Derivative financial instruments;
Hedge accounting; and
Contingent liabilities and other financial obligations.
These critical accounting policies and other significant accounting policies are discussed in Note A. Significant Accounting Policies to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report. See also Note L. Employee Benefit Plans to our audited consolidated financial statements for information about sensitivities of inputs used with respect to pension provisions. See also Note H. Business Combination, Goodwill and Intangible Assets to our audited consolidated financial statements with respect to goodwill. In particular, with regard to the assessment of the fair value of the reporting unit to which goodwill is allocated, management believes that no reasonably possible change in any of the key assumptions would cause the carrying value of the reporting units to materially exceed their recoverable amounts.
Effective from January 1, 2018 ASC 606 with respect to revenue recognition became effective. The adoption of this standard did not result in a material difference in our revenue recognition.
Effective from January 1, 2019 ASC 842 with respect to treatment and recognition of lease agreements became effective. We have adopted this standard and based on the lease portfolio as of January 1, 2019, the Company recorded additional operating lease ROU assets of approximately $30 million and operating lease liabilities of $31 million on its consolidated balance sheet, with no other adoption impacts to its consolidated statements of operations. One asset recorded under build-to-suit accounting as of December 31, 2018 and its associated liability of $29 million was derecognized upon adoption of the new standard. For our current lease obligation see also Note R.Commitments and Contingencies.
Certain of the significant accounting policies include the use of estimates, but do not meet the definition of critical because they generally do not require estimates or judgments that are as difficult or subjective to measure. However, these policies are important to an understanding of the consolidated financial statements.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We use Contribution Margin and Adjusted EBITDA as supplementalpresent certain financial measures of our operating performance. Contribution Margin and Adjusted EBITDA presented in this Management Discussion and Analysis havethat are not been prepared in accordance with GAAP or the accounting standards of any other jurisdiction. Other companies may use similar non-GAAP financial measures that are calculated differently from the way we calculate these measures. Accordingly, our Contribution Marginjurisdiction and Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarother similarly titled measures used byof other companies and should not be considered in isolation, or construed as substitutes for, revenue, consolidated net income forcompanies. For a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the period, income from operations (EBIT), gross profit and othermost directly comparable GAAP measures, as indicatorssee section Reconciliation of our results of operations in accordance with GAAP.Non-GAAP Financial Measuresbelow.
These non-GAAP measures are, but are not limited to, Contribution Margin, and Contribution Margin per Metric Ton (Non-GAAP Financial Measures)

metric ton (collectively, “Contribution Margins”), Adjusted EBITDA, Net Working Capital and Capital Expenditures. We calculatedefine Contribution Margin by subtractingas revenue less variable costs (such as raw materials, packaging, utilities and distribution costs) from our revenue.. We believe that Contribution Margin is useful because we see this measure as indicating the portion of revenue that is not consumed by such variable costs and therefore contributes to the coverage of all other costs and profits. The following table reconciles Contribution Margin anddefine Contribution Margin per Metric Ton to gross profit:
Year Ended December 31,
201920182017
unaudited
(in millions, unless otherwise indicated)
Revenue(1)
$1,476.4  $1,578.2  $1,328.3  
Variable costs(2)
(935.7) (1,000.6) (803.8) 
Contribution margin540.7  577.6  524.5  
Freight79.0  87.7  75.8  
Fixed Costs(3)
(229.8) (235.4) (222.7) 
Gross profit (1)
$389.9  $430.0  $377.6  
Volume (in kmt)1,023.2  1,084.7  1,087.4  
Contribution margin per metric ton$528.5  $532.6  $482.4  
Gross profit per metric ton$380.9  $396.4  $347.2  
(1) Separate line itemas Contribution Margin divided by volume measured in audited Financial Statements.

38



(2) Includes costs such as raw materials, packaging, utilities and distribution.

(3) Includes costs such as depreciation, amortization and impairment of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment,
personnel and other production related costs.
Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP Financial Measure)
metric tons. We define Adjusted EBITDA as income from operations (EBIT) before depreciation and amortization, adjusted for acquisition related expenses, restructuring expenses, consulting fees related to Company strategy, sharegain related to legal settlement, and includes equity earnings (loss) in affiliated companies, net of profit or loss of joint venture and certain other items. Adjusted EBITDA is defined similarly in our Credit Agreements.tax. Adjusted EBITDA is used by our management to evaluate our operating performance and make decisions regarding allocation of capital because it excludes the effects of items that have less bearing on the performance of our underlying core business. We define Net Working Capital as inventories plus current trade receivables minus trade payables. We define Capital Expenditures as cash paid for the acquisition of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment as shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
OurWe also use ofSegment Adjusted EBITDA has limitationsMargin, which we define as an analytical tool,Adjusted EBITDA for the relevant segment divided by the revenue for that segment.
We use Adjusted EBITDA as internal measures of performance to benchmark and compare performance among our own operations. We use these measures, together with other measures of performance under GAAP, to compare the relative performance of operations in planning, budgeting and reviewing the performance of our business. We believe these measures are useful measures of financial performance in addition to consolidated net income for the period, income from operations and other profitability measures under GAAP because they facilitate operating performance comparisons from period to period and company to company and, with respect to Contribution Margin, eliminate volatility in feedstock prices. By eliminating potential differences in results of operations between periods or companies caused by factors such as depreciation and amortization methods, historic cost and age of assets, financing and capital structures and taxation positions or regimes, we believe that Adjusted EBITDA can provide a useful additional basis for comparing the current performance of the underlying
oec-20211231_g1.jpg23

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A

operations being evaluated. For these reasons, we believe EBITDA-based measures are often used by the investment community as a means of comparison of companies in our industry. By deducting variable costs (such as raw materials, packaging, utilities and distribution costs) from revenue, we believe that Contribution Margins can provide a useful basis for comparing the current performance of the underlying operations being evaluated by indicating the portion of revenue that is not consumed by these variable costs and therefore contributes to the coverage of all costs and profits.
Different companies and analysts may calculate measures based on EBITDA, contribution margins and working capital differently, so making comparisons among companies on this basis should be done carefully. Adjusted EBITDA, Contribution Margins and Net Working Capital are not measures of performance under GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or construed as a substitutesubstitutes for analysis of our financial results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are: (a) although Adjusted EBITDA excludes the impact of depreciation and amortization, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future and thus the cost of replacing assets or acquiring new assets, which will affect our operating results over time, is not reflected; (b) Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect interest or certain other costs that we will continue to incur over time and will adversely affect our profit or loss, which is the ultimate measure of our financial performance and (c) other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate Adjusted EBITDA or similarly titled measures differently. Because of these and other limitations, Adjusted EBITDA should be considered alongside our other GAAP-based financial performance measures, such as revenue, consolidated net income for the period, or income from operations, (EBIT).gross profit and other GAAP measures as an indicator of our operations in accordance with GAAP.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Contribution Margin and Contribution Margin per Metric Ton (A Non-GAAP Financial Measures)

Reconciliation of Contribution Margin and Contribution Margin per Metric Ton to gross profit is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
(In millions, except per ton data)
Revenue$1,546.8 $1,136.4 
Variable costs(979.9)(672.5)
Contribution margin566.9 463.9 
Freight92.9 68.8 
Fixed Costs(273.2)(240.4)
Gross profit$386.6 $292.3 
Volume (in kmt)964.3 866.8 
Contribution margin per metric ton$587.9 $535.2 
Gross profit per metric ton400.9 337.2 
The following table presents a reconciliationReconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to consolidated net income for each of the periods indicated:is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
(In millions)
Net income$134.7$18.2
Add back income tax expense51.78.1
Add back earnings in affiliated companies, net of tax(0.7)(0.5)
Income before earnings in affiliated companies and income taxes185.725.8
Add back interest and other financial expense, net38.038.7
Add back reclassification of actuarial losses from AOCI4.89.9
Income from operations228.574.4
Add back depreciation and amortization of intangible assets, right of use assets, and property, plant and equipment104.196.6
EBITDA332.6171.0
Earnings in affiliated companies, net of tax0.70.5
Extraordinary expense items related to COVID-193.9
Evonik legal settlement:
Cash settlement(79.5)
Release of legal reserve, net(3.4)
Long term incentive plan5.24.4
EPA-related expenses2.35.2
Environmental reserve accrual7.2
Other adjustments3.315.0
Adjusted EBITDA$268.4$200.0
Adjusted EBITDA Specialty Carbon Black$148.4$110.0
Adjusted EBITDA Rubber Carbon Black120.090.0
Year Ended December 31,
201920182017
(in $ millions) 
Net income$86.9  $121.3  $64.9  
Add back income tax expense33.2  46.9  19.7  
Add back equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax(0.6) (0.6) (0.5) 
Income from operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of affiliated companies119.6  167.7  84.0  
Add back interest and other financial expense, net27.6  28.6  44.1  
Reclassification of actuarial losses from AOCI—  —  9.7  
Earnings before income taxes and finance income/costs147.2  196.3  137.9  
Add back depreciation, amortization and impairment of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment96.7  98.2  98.4  
EBITDA243.9  294.5  236.2  
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax0.6  0.6  0.5  
Restructuring expenses/(income) (1)
3.6  (24.6) 6.5  
Consulting fees related to Company strategy (2)
3.0  4.8  2.8  
Long term incentive plan9.4  13.9  8.8  
Other adjustments (3)
6.8  5.0  2.1  
Adjusted EBITDA$267.3  $294.1  $257.0  
Thereof Adjusted EBITDA Specialty Carbon Black$122.2  $149.3  $145.5  
Thereof Adjusted EBITDA Rubber Carbon Black$145.2  $144.9  $111.5  
oec-20211231_g1.jpg24
(1) Restructuring expenses

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A

Operating Results
2021 Compared to 2020
Operating results for the periods ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2017discussed are related to our strategic realignment of our worldwide Rubber footprint, and resulted in restructuring income in the period ended December 31, 2018 in particular as a result of the gain recognized in connection with the land sale in South Korea exceeding the associated cessation costs related to our worldwide Rubber footprint initiative.follows:
(2) Consulting fees related to the Orion strategy include external consulting for establishing and executing Company strategies relating to Rubber footprint realignment, conversion to U.S. dollar and U.S. GAAP, as well as costs relating to our assessment of feasibility for inclusion in certain U.S. indices.
39



(3) Other adjustments (from items with less bearing on the underlying performance of the Company’s core business) in the period ended December 31, 2019 relate to an amount of $2.9 million in non-income tax expense incurred during the construction phase of an asset. The asset under construction is expected to qualify for certain non-income tax credits once operational, since such credits were applied to the predecessor machine. This tax disadvantage cannot be capitalized as part of the project’s capital expenditure. The remainder of other adjustments include in particular costs to meet the EPA requirements of $2.3 million. Other adjustments in the period December 31, 2018 related to license fees required for certain innovative technologies to meet the EPA requirements of $1.2 million and other EPA related costs of $1.4 million. Other adjustments in the period ended December 31, 2017 primarily relate to costs associated with our EPA enforcement action of $2.4 million, costs to remediate damages incurred by hurricane Harvey of $1.4 million and costs associate with the secondary offering of our shares, offset by $1.4 million of reimbursements of reassessed real estate transfer taxes.
40



Operating Results
2019 Compared to 2018
The table below presents our historical results derived from our consolidated financial statements for the periods indicated.
Statement of operations dataYear Ended December 31,
20192018
(In millions)
Net sales$1,476.4  $1,578.2  
Cost of sales1,086.6  1,148.2  
Gross profit389.7430.0
Selling, general and administrative expenses206.9  231.9  
Research and development costs19.9  20.3  
Other expenses, net12.2  6.1  
Restructuring income—  40.3  
Restructuring expenses3.6  15.6  
Income from operations147.2196.3
Interest and other financial expense, net27.6  28.6  
Income from operations before income tax expense and equity in earnings of affiliated companies119.6167.7
Income tax expense33.2  46.9  
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax0.6  0.6  
Net income$86.9  $121.3  
Net sales
Year Ended December 31,Year-Over-Year
20212020Delta
(In millions)%
Net sales$1,546.8 $1,136.4 $410.4 36.1
Cost of sales1,160.2 844.1 316.1 37.4
Gross profit386.6292.394.332.3
Selling, general and administrative expenses210.4 176.1 34.3 19.5
Research and development costs22.0 20.2 1.8 8.9
Gain related to litigation settlement(82.9)— (82.9)
Other expenses, net8.6 21.6 (13.0)(60.2)
Income from operations228.574.4154.1207.1
Interest and other financial expense, net38.0 38.7 (0.7)(1.8)
Reclassification of actuarial losses from AOCI4.8 9.9 (5.1)(51.5)
Income before earnings in affiliated companies and income taxes185.725.8159.9619.8
Income tax expense51.7 8.1 43.6 538.3
Earnings in affiliated companies, net of tax0.7 0.5 0.2 40.0
Net income$134.7 $18.2 $116.5 640.1
Net sales    decreased
Net sales increased overall by $101.9$410.4 million, or 6.5%36.1%, from $1,578.2$1,136.4 million in 20182020 to $1,476.4$1,546.8 million in 2019.2021, driven primarily by the impact of passing through of higher feedstock costs, higher sales volume across all regions and segments, favorable impact of foreign currency translation, and favorable product mix.
This net sales decrease wasVolumes increased by 97.5 kmt, or 11.2%, to 964.3 kmt, year-over-year, primarily due to lower volumes, foreign exchange translation effectsdriven by higher demand in both segments, across all application and contractually indexed sales price decreases in our Rubber Carbon Black segment resultinggeographies, driven by a sharp global economic recovery from the pass throughCOVID-19 induced economic downturn in 2020.
Cost of lower feedstock costs to customers with agreements that link price to the cost of feedstock offset by certain base price increases.
Volume decreased by 61.5 kmt, or 5.7%, from 1,084.7 kmt in 2018 to 1,023.2 kmt in 2019. This decrease largely reflected reduced Rubber volumes in South Korea due to the closure of the plant in Seoul and slowing demand Europe and China. The decrease in volume contributed a decrease of net sales of $86.8 million. In addition to the volume related decrease of net sales, unfavorable impacts from foreign exchange translation effects of $33.5 million were incurred. Oil price changes contributed a further reduction of net sales in 2019 compared to 2018 of $18.4 million. These unfavorable impacts were in part offset by increases of certain base prices of $40.8 million.
Cost of sales and Gross profit
Cost of sales decreasedincreased by $61.6$316.1 million, or 5.4%37.4%, from $1,148.2$844.1 million in 20182020 to $1,086.6$1,160.2 million in 2019. The 5.7% decrease2021, primarily driven by higher production and associated costs. Fluctuations in volume in 2019 compared to 2018 resulted in a decrease ofour cost of sales of 4.9%, or $56.4 millionare generally driven by changes in 2019 compared to 2018.
Lower overall net sales as a result of the above mentioned impacts were not fully offset by lower cost of sales. As a result gross profit decreased by $40.3 million, or 9.4%, from $430.0 million in 2018 to $389.7 million in 2019 for reasons described above.feedstock and energy costs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreasedincreased by $25.0$34.3 million, or 10.8%19.5%, from $231.9$176.1 million in 20182020 to $206.9$210.4 million in 2019 mainly as a result of lower volume2021 driven primarily by higher freight costs associated with increase in 2019 compared to 2018sales volumes and lower personnel related expenses in fiscal year 2019higher incentive compensation.
Gain related to bonuseslitigation settlement
During the second quarter of 2021, Evonik agreed to make a one-time cash payment of €66.55 million ($79.5 million) to settle dispute which originated from the acquisition of the carbon black business line from Evonik, completed on July 29, 2011 by Rhône Capital and long term incentive expenses as well as favorable impactsTriton Partners. The Acquisition agreement provided for a partial indemnity from foreign currency translation impacts.
ResearchEvonik against various exposures, including capital investments, fines and development costs
R&D expenses decreased by $0.4 arising in connection with U.S. Clean Air Act violations that occurred prior to the closing of the Acquisition (i.e., under Evonik’s control). In addition, we released $3.4 million from $20.3 million in 2018 to $19.9 million in 2019. This decrease is primarilyof legal reserves, net, related to the timing of expenditures for individual development of programs.this dispute.
Other expenses, net
Other expenses, net which comprises other operating income and other operating expenses, amounteddecreased to $12.2$8.6 million in 20192021 from $21.6 million in 2020.
The 2020 fiscal year included additional $3.9 million expenses incurred due to COVID-19, which was not repeated in 2021 and higher restructuring cost compared to 2021, partially offset by higher long-term incentive compensation costs and reserves for environmental remediation costs.
41
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
25

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A

$6.1 million in 2018.
In 2019, other operating income amounted to $5.9 million and included, among other items, a gain related to an operating derivative of $1.3 million, a non-income tax related tax reimbursement $1.1 million and insurance claims of $0.8 million. Other operating expenses in 2019 amounted to $18.1 million, comprised primarily of $9.9 million treated as other adjustment items and consulting fees related to Company strategy, miscellaneous other third-party expenses of $4.3 million and an impairment charge of $1.3 million.
In 2018, other operating income amounted to $5.0 million and included, among other items, $1.7 million income from the reversal of provisions. Other operating expenses in 2018 amounted to $11.1 million, comprised primarily of $4.8 million consulting fees related to Company strategy and license fees required for certain innovative technologies to meet the EPA requirements of $1.2 million and other EPA related costs of $1.9 million.
Restructuring expenses/(income), net
In 2019 restructuring expenses amounted to $3.6 million associated with our Rubber footprint restructuring costs.
In 2018, restructuring expenses/(income), net, comprise restructuring income of $40.3 million and restructuring expenses of $15.6 million. As part of the strategic repositioning of the Rubber business footprint, we consolidated our two production network in South Korea, ceased production at our Seoul plant and sold the land. Proceeds from the land sale exceeded the associated closing and remediation costs and we recorded a restructuring gain of $24.6 million.
Our Rubber footprint restructuring activities in the fiscal years 2016 to 2019 generated annualized savings of approximately $16 million per year on a consolidated basis since the end of fiscal year 2018 from the facility shutdown in Ambès, France, the facility consolidations in Seoul, South Korea, the related headcount reductions, as well as to a lesser extent, to operational efficiencies. These anticipated savings were expected to come essentially in full from our reportable Rubber segment. Besides the realized one-time gain recorded upon the sale of our land in Seoul, South Korea, a significant portion of the anticipated savings are expected to be reinvested in business development, research & development and capital improvements to help drive organic growth.
Income from operations
Income from operations decreasedincreased by $49.2$154.1 million or 25.0%,to $228.5 million compared to 2020. The increase was primarily driven by passing through of higher feedstock costs, higher sales volume due to sharp global recovery from $196.3 million in 2018 to $147.2 million in 2019 mainly as a result of decreased gross profitCOVID-19 across all regions, favorable product mix and the absence of positive one-time proceeds from our land sale in South Korea in 2018.Evonik legal settlement related gain, partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative costs.
Interest and other financial expense, net
Interest and other financial expense, net comprisesis comprised of interest and other financial income and interest and other financial expenses. Interest and other financial expense, net amounted to $27.6$38.0 million in 20192021 compared to $28.6$38.7 million in 2018.
Interest and other financial expense, net in 2019 includes, among others, $15.22020. The decrease of $0.7 million of regular interest expenses for our term loan facilities, $2.1 million of amortization of capitalized transaction costs and $3.6 million net expenses ofwas primarily due to lower foreign currency revaluation effects.
Interest and other financial expense, net in 2018 includes, $20.6 milliontransactions, partially offset by costs associated with refinancing of regular interest expenses for our term loan facilities, $2.2 millionTerm-Loan during the third quarter of amortization of capitalized transaction costs and $1.3 million net expenses of foreign currency revaluation effects.
Income from operations before income tax expense and equity in earnings of affiliated companies
Income from operations before income tax expense and equity in earnings of affiliated companies decreased by $48.1 million, or 28.7%, from $167.7 million in 2018 to $119.6 million in 2019, as a result of the effects described above.2021.
Income tax expense
Income tax expense amounted to $33.2$51.7 million in 20192021 compared to $46.9$8.1 million in 2018,2020, as a result of decreasedincreased income before taxes.
In 2019,2021, the effective tax rate of 27.6% deviated fromwas in line with the expected Company rate of 32.0% in particular due to favorablerate. Unfavorable impacts from non-deductible business expenses and valuation allowance adjustments of deferred tax rate differentials of $3.5 millionassets were offset by the benefit from the reduction in the valuation allowance related tax loss carryforwards in Brazil, interest carryforwards in Germany and prior year taxes of $3.2 primarily associated with a conclusion of a tax audit. The amounts previously accrued for this purpose were released accordingly.favorable pre-tax earnings mix by jurisdiction. For details regarding this deviation, see Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data andNote Q.P. Income Taxes to the audited consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 2018,2020, the effective tax rate of 27.9% deviated fromwas in line with the expected Company raterate. Unfavorable impacts from non-deductible business expenses, pre-tax earnings mix by jurisdiction and valuation adjustments of 32.0%deferred tax assets primarily associated with the economic downturn related to COVID-19 were offset by the benefit from the reduction in particular duethe valuation allowance related to U.S. tax rate differentialscredits of $6.7$3.6 million. For details regarding this deviation, see Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data andNote Q.P. Income Taxes to the audited consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies represents the equity income from our German JV, which was comparable in 2019 and
42



2018.
Net income
Our net income in 2019 amounted to $86.9 million, a decrease of $34.4 million, reflecting all the factors described above.
Contribution Marginmargin and Contribution Marginmargin per Metric Ton (Non-GAAPmetric ton (A Non-GAAP Financial Measures)
Contribution Margin decreasedmargin increased by $37.0$103.0 million, or 6.4%22.2%, from $577.6$463.9 million in 20182020 to $540.7$566.9 million in 2019,2021. Contribution margin per metric ton increased slightly by 9.8%, from $535.2 per metric ton in 2020 to $587.9 per metric ton in 2021.
The increase was primarily driven by passing through of higher feedstock costs, higher sales volume due to lower volumes,sharp global recovery from COVID-19 across all regions and segments, favorable product mix and higher energy sales, favorable impact of foreign exchange ratecurrency translation, effects and unfavorable oil price differentials, partially offset by base price increases. Contribution Margin per Metric Ton decreased slightly by 0.8%, from $532.6 per Metric Ton in 2018 to $528.5 per Metric Ton in 2019.higher selling, general and administrative costs.
Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP(A Non-GAAP Financial Measure)
Adjusted EBITDA decreasedincreased by $26.8$68.4 million, or 9.1%34.2%, from $294.1$200.0 million in 20182020 to $267.3$268.4 million in 2019 mainly as a result2021, primarily driven by passing through of the decrease in Contribution Margin, somewhathigher feedstock costs, higher sales volume due to sharp global recovery from COVID-19 across all regions, and impact of favorable product mix, partially offset by lower bonus expenses.higher selling, general and administrative costs.
2018 Compared to 2017
oec-20211231_g1.jpg26

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
The comparison of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 can be found in our annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 located within Part I, Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects, which is incorporated by reference herein.
Segment Discussion
Our business operations are divided into two operating segments: segments—the Specialty Carbon Black segment and the Rubber Carbon Black segment.Black. We use segment revenue, segment gross profit, segment volume, Segment Adjusted EBITDA and Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margin as measures of segment performance and profitability.
The table below presents our segment results derived from our audited consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements for 2019, 20182021, and 2017.2020.
Year Ended December 31,
201920182017
(In millions, unless otherwise indicated)
Specialty Carbon Black
Net sales$508.5  $545.4  $478.9  
Cost of sales(338.0) (346.0) (289.5) 
Gross profit$170.4  $199.4  $189.4  
Volume (kmt)(1)
251.0  262.4  261.4  
Adjusted EBITDA$122.2  $149.3  $145.5  
Adjusted EBITDA Margin (%)(2)
24.0  27.4  30.4  
Rubber Carbon Black
Net sales$967.9  $1,032.8  $849.4  
Cost of sales(748.6) (802.2) (661.2) 
Gross profit$219.3  $230.6  $188.2  
Volume (kmt)(1)
772.1  822.3  826.0  
Adjusted EBITDA$145.2  $144.9  $111.5  
Adjusted EBITDA Margin (%)(2)
15.0  14.0  13.1  
(1) Unaudited.
(2) Defined as Adjusted EBITDA divided by net sales.
Year Ended December 31,Year-Over-Year
20212020Delta
(In millions, unless otherwise indicated)%
Specialty Carbon Black
Net sales$598.2 $445.2 $153.0 34.4
Cost of sales(400.6)(296.5)(104.1)35.1
Gross profit$197.6 $148.7 $48.9 32.9
Volume (kmt)(1)
263.2 231.9 31.3 13.5
Adjusted EBITDA$148.4 $110.0 $38.4 34.9
Adjusted EBITDA Margin (%)24.8 24.7 0.1 0.4
Rubber Carbon Black
Net sales$948.6 $691.2 $257.4 37.2
Cost of sales(759.6)(547.6)(212.0)38.7
Gross profit$189.0 $143.6 $45.4 31.6
Volume (kmt)701.1 634.9 66.2 10.4
Adjusted EBITDA$120.0 $90.0 $30.0 33.3
Adjusted EBITDA Margin (%)12.7 13.0 (0.3)(2.3)
Specialty Carbon Black
20192021 Compared to 20182020
Net sales of the Specialty Carbon Black segment decreasedincreased by $36.9$153.0 million, or 6.8%34.4%, from $545.4$445.2 million in 20182020 to $508.5$598.2 million in 2019,2021, primarily driven by passing through of higher feedstock costs, higher sales volumes due to lower volumessharp global recovery from COVID-19 induced economic downturn reflecting a broad-based demand increase across nearly all applications, favorable product mix and favorable impact of foreign exchange rate translation effects, partially offset by base price increases.
43



currency translation.
Volume of the Specialty Carbon Black segment decreasedincreased by 11.331.3 kmt, or 4.3%13.5%, from 262.4231.9 kmt in 20182020 to 251.0263.2 kmt in 2019, as2021, driven primarily by sharp global recovery from COVID-19 induced economic downturn reflecting a result of lowerbroad-based demand in particular in North America, partially offset by increased volumes from our Chinese and European plants.increase across nearly all applications.
Gross profit of the Specialty Carbon Black segment decreasedincreased by $28.9$48.9 million, or 14.5%32.9%, from $199.4$148.7 million in 20182020 to $170.4$197.6 million in 2019, mainly as2021, primarily driven by passing through of higher feedstock costs, higher sales volume due to global recovery from COVID-19 induced economic downturn reflecting a result of unfavorable foreign exchange rate translation effectsbroad-based demand increase across nearly all applications, and lower volumes.favorable product mix.
Adjusted EBITDA of the Specialty Carbon Black segment decreasedincreased by $27.1$38.4 million, or 18.1%34.9%, from $149.3$110.0 million in 20182020 to $122.2$148.4 million in 2019,2021, primarily driven by passing through of higher feedstock costs, higher sales volume due to global recovery from COVID-19 induced economic downturn reflecting the decrease in gross profit.
2018 Compared to 2017
The comparisona broad-based demand increase across nearly all applications, passing through of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018higher feedstock costs, and 2017 can be found in our annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 located within Part I, Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects, which is incorporated by reference herein.favorable product mix.
Rubber Carbon Black
20192021 Compared to 20182020
Net sales of the Rubber Carbon Black segment decreasedincreased by $64.9$257.4 million, or 6.3%37.2%, from $1,032.8$691.2 million in 20182020 to $967.9$948.6 million in 2019,2021, primarily driven by passing through of higher feedstock costs, higher sales volume due to lower volumes. Unfavorable impactssharp global recovery from contractually indexed sales prices resulting from the pass through changes in feedstock costs as well as unfavorableCOVID-19 induced economic downturn and favorable impact of foreign exchange rate translation effects were almost in full offset by base price increases.currency translation.
Volume of the Rubber Carbon Black segment decreasedincreased by 50.266.2 kmt, or 6.1%10.4%, from 822.3634.9 kmt in 20182020 to 772.1701.1 kmt in 2019 mainly due to lower demand in all our major regions except for North America.2021, reflecting higher demand.
Gross profit of the Rubber Carbon Black segment decreasedincreased by $11.3$45.4 million, or 4.9%31.6%, from $230.6$143.6 million in 20182020 to $219.3$189.0 million in 2019, mainly as2021, primarily driven by passing through of higher feedstock costs, and higher sales volume due to global recovery from COVID-19 induced economic downturn reflecting a result of lower volumes, negative feedstock differentials and negative foreign exchange rate translation effects, in part offset by base price increases.broad-based demand increase across nearly all applications.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg27

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A

Adjusted EBITDA of the Rubber Carbon Black segment increased by $0.3$30.0 million, or 0.2%33.3%, from $144.9$90.0 million in 20182020 to $145.2$120.0 million in 2019, while the decrease in gross profit was2021, primarily due to passing through of higher feedstock costs, favorable operating leverage associated with substantially higher sales volume, partially offset in part by lower sellinghigher general and general administrative charges, bonus expenses as well as compensating impacts for foreign exchange rates translation effects.
2018 Compared to 2017
We refer to our annual report 2018 filed with the SEC on From 20-F.The comparison of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 can be found in our annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 located within Part I, Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects, which is incorporated by reference herein.expenses.
44



Liquidity and Capital Resources
Historical Cash Flows
The tablestable below present our historicalpresents cash flows derived from our audited consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements.
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
(In millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities$145.2 $125.3 
Net cash used in investing activities(214.7)(144.9)
Net cash provided by financing activities73.3 13.5 
2021
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2021 amounted to $145.2 million. The cash provided by operating activities primarily reflected our net income, adjusted for 2019, 2018non-cash items and 2017.changes in working capital and $82.9 million related to Evonik legal settlement gain. See “Note Q.Commitments and Contingencies” for further discussion on Evonik legal settlement.
Year Ended December 31,
201920182017
(In millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities$231.5  $122.0  $147.7  
Net cash used in investing activities(155.8) (88.1) (90.3) 
Net cash used in financing activities(68.6) (43.8) (68.5) 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the end of the period68.2  61.6  75.2  
Less restricted cash at the end of the period4.5  4.6  2.9  
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period63.7  57.0  72.3  
Net cash used in investing activities in 2021 was $214.7 million. Approximately $119.8 million related to capital expenditures comprised of a combination of safety, sustainability and growth investments. Additionally, approximately $94.9 million was associated with our ongoing efforts to install emissions reduction technology to meet the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) requirements.
2019Net cash provided by financing activities in 2021 were $73.3 million comprised primarily of net borrowings under our revolving credit facility of $75.8 million for our working capital. Our financing activity included refinancing of our Term-loan and associated costs. See Note J. Debt and Other Obligations for further discussion on our Term-loan refinancing.
2020
Net cash provided by operating activities in 20192020 amounted to $231.5$125.3 million and consisted of a consolidated profit for the period of $86.9$18.2 million, adjustments primarily for depreciation of $96.7$96.6 million and cash inflows from changes in operating assets and liabilities of $17.7 million including changes in Net Working Capital of $49.8 million.working capital.
Net cash used in investing activities in 20192020 amounted to $155.8 million$144.9 million. These expenditures were comprised of $100.2 million capital expenditure for maintenancea combination of safety, sustainability and overhaul projects and expenditures associated as well as $50.6 million environmental improvements of our U.S. based facilities to address the EPA requirements.
Net cash used in financing activities in 2019 amounted to $68.6 million. Cash inflows during the fiscal year of $97.0 million are related to local bank loan facilities while $101.3 million of cash outflows were used during the year for repayments of those and other current borrowings, $8.0 million regular debt repayment and $48.0 million dividend payments.
2018
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2018 amounted to $122.0 million and consisted of a consolidated profit for the period of $121.3 million, adjustments primarily for depreciation of $98.2 million and cash outflows from Net Working Capital of $65.6 million.
Net cash used in investing activities in 2018 amounted to $88.1 million. It comprises proceeds from our land sale in Korea and $36.6 million were used in connection with the acquisition of the acetylene carbon black manufacturer Société du Noird'Acétylène de l'Aubette, SAS (“SN2A”), SN2A, now known as Orion Engineered Carbons SAS. The remaining capital expenditure for maintenance and overhaul projects,growth investments as well as expenditures associated with our ongoing efforts to consolidate our two productions plantsinstall emissions reduction technology to meet EPA requirements in South Korea were approximately $103.8 million as well as expenditures of $12.6 million used in commencing the EPA related investments.
Net cash used in financing activities in 2018 amounted to $43.8 million. $26.4 million was used for repayments of current borrowing, $8.3 million of regular debt repayments, $4.9 million used for share repurchases and $47.7 million for dividend payments. Cash inflows of $49.0 million is related to local bank loan facilities.
2017U.S.
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2017 amounted to $147.7 million and consisted of a consolidated profit for the period of $64.9 million, adjustments primarily for depreciation of $98.4 million, cash outflows from changes in operating assets and liabilities of $21.6 million including changes in Net Working Capital of $24.0 million.
Net cash used in investing activities in 2017 amounted to $90.3 million for capital expenditure for maintenance and overhaul projects as well as expenditures associated with our efforts to consolidate our two production plants in South Korea.
Cash outflows from financing activities in 20172020 amounted to $68.5 million. $28.9$13.5 million, primarily reflecting repayments of borrowing, of which $20.7 million was paid as voluntary redemption of our Term Loan. In addition, $45.7 million was used for dividend payments. Cash inflows of $11.7 million is relatedthe company drawing under its revolver to local ancillary bank loan facilities.
45



bolster its cash position and enhance financial flexibility to successfully manage through the pandemic.
Sources of Liquidity
Our principal sources of liquidity are the net cash generated (i) from operating activities, primarily driven by our operating results and changes in working capital requirements and (ii) from financing activities, the cash balances,primarily driven by borrowing amounts available under our committed multicurrency, senior secured Revolving Credit FacilityRCF and financing sources like the subsidiariesrelated ancillary facilities, withvarious uncommitted local financial institutions. credit lines and, from time to time, term loan borrowings.
We believe that our anticipated future operating cash positionflow, capacity under our existing credit facilities and cash generated from operationsuncommitted bilateral lines of credit, along with access to surety bonds will be adequatesufficient to supportfinance our planned capital expenditures, settle our commitments and contingencies and address our normal anticipated working capital needs for the further growthforeseeable future.
As of December 31, 2021, the company had estimated liquidity of $241.6 million, including cash and equivalents of $65.7 million, $166.7 million in availability remaining under our business.revolving credit facility, including ancillary lines, and $9.2 million under other available credit lines.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg28

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A

Net Working Capital (Non-GAAP Financial Measure)
We define Net Working Capital as the total of inventories and current trade receivables, less trade payables. Net Working Capital is a non-GAAP financial measure, and other companies may use a similarly titled financial measure that is calculated differently from the way we calculate Net Working Capital. The following tablestable set forth the principal components of our Net Working Capital as of the dates indicated.
Year Ended December 31,
201920182017
(In millions)
Inventories$164.8  $183.6  $159.3  
Trade receivables$212.6  $262.8  $234.3  
Trade payables$(156.3) $(163.6) $169.6  
Net working capital$221.1  $282.9  $224.0  
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
(In millions)
Inventories$229.8 $141.5 
Trade receivables288.9 234.8 
Trade payables(195.1)(131.2)
Net working capital$323.6 $245.1 
Our Net Working Capital position can vary significantly from month to month, mainly due to fluctuations in oil prices and receipts of carbon black oil shipments. In general, increases in the cost of raw materials lead to an increase in our Net Working Capital requirements, as our inventories and trade receivables increase as a result of higher carbon black oil prices and related sales levels. These increases are partially offset by related increases in trade payables. Due to the quantity of carbon black oil that we typically keep in stock, such increases in Net Working Capital occur gradually over a period of two to three months. Conversely, decreases in the cost of raw materials lead to a decrease in our Net Working Capital requirements over the same period of time. Based on 2019 Net Working Capital requirements, we estimate that a $10 per barrel movement in the Brent crude oil price correlates to a movement in our Net Working Capital of approximately $27 million to $30 million within about a two to three month period. In times of relatively stable oil prices, the effects on our Net Working Capital levels are less significant and Net Working Capital swings increase in an environment of high price volatility.
Our Net Working Capital decreased from $282.9increased to $323.6 million as of December 31, 20182021 compared to $221.1$245.1 million as of December 31, 2019 primarily2020. The components of working capital that used or provided cash were:
Inventories—higher oil prices and an increase in production to meet forecasted demand resulted in increased raw material and finished goods inventory; and
Trade receivables—increase was driven by higher sales due to higher product demand and passing through of higher feedstock costs.
Trade receivables include a long-term steam supply contract between one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and the impactcity of Hürth, Germany (Stadtwerke Hürth/Hürth municipal utilities). The municipality financed certain turbines and infrastructure which are operated by us under a finance lease agreement. In addition, the city of Hürth entered into a long-term supply agreement for heat delivered to the city. Since the fourth quarter of 2020, the city of Hürth has not fully honored the contractually-stipulated calculation for heat deliveries, amongst other stipulations. As a result, Orion has open receivables from lower feedstock coststhe city of Hürth totaling $5.5 million as of December 31, 2021 while the city of Hürth argues open claims of approximately $3.3 million related to lease payments. Orion is in negotiations with the city but is prepared to pursue its rights vigorously through legal enforcement if necessary.
Those increases were partially offset by:
Accounts payable—higher production and overall weaker volumes and thus lower receivables at year end.higher oil prices resulted in increased accounts payable.
Capital Expenditures (Non-GAAP Financial Measure)Requirements
Capital ExpenditureWe define Capital Expenditures as cash paid for the acquisition of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment as shown in the consolidated financial statements.
Our Capital Expenditures amounted to $90.3 million in 2017, $116.2 million in 2018 and $155.8 million in 2019.Consolidated Financial Statements. We plan to finance our Capital Expenditures, including the increase seen in 2019 related to EPA related expenditure,expenditures, with cash generated by our operating activities. WithTo finance construction of the exception of required expendituresMintaka facility in association with our settlement with theChina we plan to borrow up to $80 million. Other than EPA spending, we currently do not have any material commitments to make Capital Expenditures and do not plan to make Capital Expenditures outside the ordinary course of our business. See “Note R.Q. Commitments and Contingencies” for further details regarding the EPA settlement.settlement in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report..
Capital ExpendituresDebt and Other Obligations—Our gross debt balance as of December 31, 2021 was $788.5 million, an increase of $44.9 million compared to December 31, 2020. Maturities of $3.0 million of debt, due in 2019 amounted2022, excluding net unamortized premiums and discounts, will be paid from current cash balances and cash generated by operations. For more information on Debt, refer to $155.8 millionNote J. Debt and were mainly composedOther Obligations, in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of maintenancePart II of this Annual Report.
Contractual Obligations—For more information on Contractual obligations, refer to “Note Q.Commitments and overhaul projects including 50.6 million expenditures associated with our effortsContingencies” in Notes to commencing environmental investments requiredConsolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.
Leases—For operating and finance leases, refer to address the EPA requirements Note G. Leases in the United States.
Capital ExpendituresNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in 2018 amounted to $116.2 million and were mainly composedItem 8 of maintenance and overhaul projects as well as expenditures associated with our efforts to consolidate our to productions plants in South Korea and commencing investments required to address the EPA requirements in the United StatesPart II of $12.6 million.
Capital Expenditures in 2017 amounted to $90.3 million and were mainly composed of maintenance and overhaul projects.
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
Spending on innovation, including both applications technology and process development, amounted to $19.9 million in 2019, $20.3 million in 2018 and $18.2 million in 2017 and was mostly directed towards the development of new specialty carbon black products, new applications for carbon black products and the improvement of process efficiencies, and to a lesser extent towards research on installation of equipment to reduce emission levels in connection with the recent EPA consent decree. For further information see “this Annual Report.Item 1. Business—Innovation.”
46oec-20211231_g1.jpg29

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A



Trend Information
See Item 1. Business7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”Recent Developments and Certain Known Trends.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2019, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Contractual ObligationsCritical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The following table sets forthpreparation of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019:
 Less than 1 year1-3 years4-5 yearsMore than 5 yearsTotal
In million
Long-term debt obligations(1)
$26.9  $51.5  $646.3  $—  $724.7  
Revolving credit facility(2)
—  —  —  —  —  
Term loan(3)
8.1  16.1  618.9  —  643.1  
Interest expense on long-term debt(4)
18.8  35.3  27.4  —  81.6  
Purchase commitments(5)
137.2  205.0  —  —  342.2  
Operating leases7.6  12.0  9.4  5.6  34.6  
Total contractual obligations(6)
$171.7  $268.5  $655.7  $5.6  $1,101.4  
(1)Sets forth obligationsfinancial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to repay principalmake estimates and interest under our long-term debt obligations.
(2)Representsassumptions that affect the obligation under the Revolving Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2019, there were no cash amounts drawn under our Revolving Credit Facility of €175.0 million (USD equivalent: $196.6 million).
(3)Represents the Term Loans and includes the outstanding principalreported amounts of $281.3 million (U.S. Dollar term loan)assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and $361.8 million (EUR term loan) which has been translated atrelated disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The policies and estimates discussed below are considered by our management to be critical to an exchange rateunderstanding of the Consolidated Financial Statements because their application requires the most significant judgments from management in estimating matters for financial reporting that are inherently uncertain. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in this Annual Report in Form 10-K.
Use of Estimates—We consider an accounting estimate to be critical to the financial statements if (i) the estimate is complex in nature or requires a high degree of judgment and (ii) if different estimates and assumptions were used, the results could have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements. Estimates and assumptions are based on information available at the reporting datetime such estimates and assumptions are made. Adjustments made with respect to the use of $1.1234 per €1.00.these estimates and assumptions often relate to information not previously available. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements. We evaluate our estimates and application of our policies on an ongoing basis. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Inventories—We account for our raw materials, work-in-progress and finished goods inventories using average cost method of accounting. The borrowing costs on the principal of the Euro-denominated Term Loan have been translated applying the same exchange rate.
(4)Represents interest expenses related to indebtedness from our Term Loans, assuming future interest based on a forward rate assumption.
(5)Represents purchase commitments under long-term supply agreements for the supplycost of raw materials, mainlywhich represents a substantial portion of our operating expenses, and energy costs generally follow price trends for crude oil andand/or natural gas.
(6)This amountWe periodically review inventory for both potential obsolescence and potential declines in anticipated selling prices. Due to natural inventory composition changes, variation in pricing from period to period does not reflectnecessarily result in a linear lower of cost or market (“LCM”) impact. Fluctuation in the Company’s obligations underprices from period to period may result in the recognition of charges to adjust the value of inventory to the lower of cost or market in periods of falling prices and the reversal of those charges in subsequent interim periods as market prices recover. We write down the value of our inventories by an amount equal to the difference between the cost of the inventory and its existing pension arrangements,estimated net realizable value. Historically, such write-downs have not been material. However, if actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management at the time of the assessment, additional inventory write-downs may be required, which could reduce our gross profit and our earnings.
Goodwill Impairment—We record goodwill for the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the net assets of the acquired business. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually or more frequently if an event or change in circumstance indicates that an impairment may have occurred.
We also have the option to proceed directly to the quantitative impairment test. Under the quantitative impairment test, the fair value of each reporting unit, calculated using a discounted cash flow model, is compared to its carrying value, including goodwill. The discounted cash flow model inherently utilizes a significant number of estimates and assumptions including operating margins, tax rates, discount rates, capital expenditures and working capital changes. If the carrying value of the reporting unit including goodwill exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge equal to the excess would be recognized, up to a maximum amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.
For 2021 we performed a qualitative impairment assessment and for 2020 we performed a quantitative impairment assessment of our reporting units. Both periods indicated the fair value of our reporting units was greater than their carrying value including goodwill. Accordingly, a quantitative goodwill impairment test was not required in 2021. No goodwill impairment was recognized in 2021 or 2020.
Loss Contingencies—We record liabilities for loss contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss is reasonably estimable. We provide disclosure when there is a reasonable possibility that the ultimate loss will exceed the recorded provision by a material amount or if the loss is not reasonably estimable but is expected to be material to our financial results. We are currently involved in litigation and other proceedings, as of December 31, 2019 amounted to $21.4 million (see “discussed in Note L. Employee Benefit PlansQ. Commitments and Contingencies to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. We have accrued our estimates of the probable losses associated with these matters and associated legal costs are generally recognized as incurred. However, our losses are typically resolved over long periods of time and are often difficult to estimate due to various factors including the possibility of multiple actions by third parties. Therefore, it is possible future earnings could be affected by changes in our estimates related to these matters.
Accruals for Taxes Based on Income—The determination of our provision for income taxes and the calculation of our tax benefits and liabilities is subject to management’s estimates and judgments due to the complexity of the tax laws and regulations in the tax jurisdictions in which we operate. Uncertainties exist with respect to interpretation of these complex laws and regulations.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis, and are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to reverse.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg                with regard to pension provisions and post-retirement benefits included in the audited financial statements).30

The level of performance bonds, guarantees and letters of credit required for carbon black oil purchasing could increase as a result of increasing oil prices or other factors (such as our ownership structure). As at December 31, 2019
Orion Engineered Carbons GmbH has three guarantees issued by Euler Hermes S.A. with a total volume of $9.2 million (in prior year four guarantees by Euler Hermes S.A. of $15.2 million; one guarantee insurance issued by Deutsche Bank AG with a volume of $2.2 million (in prior year one guarantee issued by Deutsche Bank AG with a volume of $2.9 million). NoneS.A

We recognize future tax benefits to the extent that the realization of these guarantees reducebenefits is more likely than not. Our current provision for income taxes is impacted by the possible utilization limitrecognition and release of valuation allowances related to net deferred tax assets in certain jurisdictions. Further changes to these valuation allowances may impact our future provision for income taxes, which will include no tax benefit with respect to losses incurred and no tax expense with respect to income generated in these countries until the respective valuation allowance is eliminated.
We recognize the financial statement benefits with respect to an uncertain income tax position that we have taken or may take on an income tax return when we believe it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained with the tax authorities.
ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING CHANGES
For a discussion of the current RCF.potential impact of new accounting pronouncements on our Consolidated Financial Statements, see Note B. Recent Accounting Pronouncementsto the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our activities expose us to a variety of market risks. Our primary market risk exposures relate to foreign exchange, interest rate and commodity risks. To manage these risks and our exposure to the unpredictability of financial markets, we seek to minimize potential adverse effectsmitigate their impact on our financial performance and capital. Where appropriate, we use derivative financial instruments solely for the purpose of hedging the currency,foreign exchange, interest and commodity risks arising from our operations and sources of finance. For this purpose, a systematic financial and risk management system has been established. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.
The following discussion and analysis only addresses our market risk and does not address other financial risks that we face in the normal course of business, including credit risk and liquidity risk.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk management aims to protect consolidated net income from negative effects from market interest rate fluctuations. Orion would beis exposed to interest rate risk which might arise from incurring new liabilities at this time due to higher interest rates. Since theWe also have Term Loans which are variable interest rate instruments, we are exposedthat exposes us to the market risk arising from changes in the yield curve. Appropriate hedging instruments are in place to mitigate the exposure arising from increasing interest rates.
47



The table below shows the sensitivity of the interest expense to changes in the interest rate, after the impact of hedge accounting. It shows the change resulting from a hypothetical fluctuation in the three-month LIBOR of 50 basis points (0.50%) as of December 31, 20192021 assuming that all other variables remain unchanged. For example, changes in USD/EUR currency rate would have an impact on our interest exposure and vice versa. Changes in interest rates would also have a related impact on our foreign currency (USD) exposure. The sensitivity analysis assumes that the hypothetical interest rate was valid and that the Revolving Credit FacilitiesFacility was utilized in the full amount over the course of the entire year.
The effect of this hypothetical change in the interest rate of the variable rate loan on our consolidated income from operationsIncome before taxes and equityearnings in earnings of affiliated companies and income taxes ("income before taxes" in this section) for the year ended December 31, 20192021 is as follows:
December 31, 2019December 31, 2021
Increase by 0.50%Decrease by 0.50%Increase by 0.50%Decrease by 0.50%
In thousands  In millions
Increase (decrease) in the interest expense$12,648  $(2,770) 
Increase (decrease) in income before taxes$12,648  $2,770  
(Increase) decrease in interest expense(Increase) decrease in interest expense$(5.6)$1.5 
Increase (decrease) in equity (cash flow hedge reserve)Increase (decrease) in equity (cash flow hedge reserve)$2,566  $(1,302) Increase (decrease) in equity (cash flow hedge reserve)1.9 (1.1)
Increase (decrease) in total comprehensive income before taxesIncrease (decrease) in total comprehensive income before taxes$15,214  $1,468  Increase (decrease) in total comprehensive income before taxes7.5 (5.8)
The above table does not include the impact of hedges.
Foreign Currency Risk
Our functional currencyA significant portion of our Company's main borrowing entity, OEC GmbH,reporting entities use the euro as their functional currency. Our reporting currency is Euro. Currency risks primarily stem from future cash flows related to interest payments and the U.S. Dollar-denominated Term Loan. In additiondollar. The translation gains or losses that result from the process of translating the euro denominated financial statements to currency risks from operating activities, these interest and principal repayments mainly representU.S. dollars are deferred in Accumulated other comprehensive income until such time as those entities may be substantially liquidated or sold. Changes in the risk in connection with exchange rate fluctuations.value of the U.S. dollar relative to the euro can therefore have a significant impact on Comprehensive income.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg31

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A

The table below shows the sensitivity with regard to the effect of a change in the Euro/U.S. Dollar exchange rate using the outstanding amount and the interest for the U.S. Dollar-denominated Term Loan.Loan issued by a 100% wholly owned subsidiary whose functional currency is Euro. A fluctuation of the Euro/U.S. Dollar exchange rate of 10% as of December 31, 20192021 with other conditions remaining unchanged, would have the following effect on our income from operationsIncome before taxes and equityearnings in earnings from affiliated companies or capital:and income taxes:
December 31, 2019
Value of the U.S. Dollar in relation to the Euro (1)
 Increase by 10%Decrease by 10%
In thousands  
FX gain / (FX loss) in finance result$1,479  $(1,807) 
Increase (decrease) in income before taxes$1,479  $(1,807) 
Increase (decrease) in total comprehensive income before taxes$1,479  $(1,807) 
December 31, 2021
Value of the U.S. Dollar in relation to the Euro (1)
 Increase by 10%Decrease by 10%
In thousands
FX gain (loss) in financial result$9.3 $(11.4)
(1) U.S. Dollar/Euro exchange rate as of December 31, 2019: 1.1234.2021: 1.1326.
The above table does not include the impact of hedges.
Some of our operations enter into transactions that are not denominated in their functional currency. This results in an exposure to foreign currency risk, including, but not limited to, third party and intercompany receivables and payables and intercompany loans.
Our policy is to maintain a balanced position in foreign currencies to minimize exchange gains and losses arising from changes in exchange rates. To minimize the effects of our net currency exchange exposures, we enter into foreign exchange contracts and cross-currency swaps. Our net position in foreign currencies is monitored daily.
We maintain risk management control practices to monitor foreign currency risk attributable to our inter-company and third party outstanding foreign currency balances. These practices involve the centralization of our exposure to underlying currencies that are not subject to central bank and/or country specific restrictions. By centralizing most of our foreign currency exposure into one subsidiary, we are able to take advantage of any natural offsets thereby reducing the overall impact of changes in foreign currency rates on our earnings. At December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, a 10% fluctuation compared to the U.S. dollar in the underlying currencies that have no central bank or other currency restrictions related to non-hedged monetary assets, net would have resulted in an additional impact to earnings of approximately $8.3 million, $4.2 million, and $11.2 million, respectively.
Interest and other financial expense, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations reflected net exchange rate foreign currency losses of $6.4 million, $15.2 million and $3.6 million in 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.
Commodity Risk
Commodity risk results from changes in market prices for raw materials, mainly carbon black oil. Raw materials are primarily purchased to meet our production requirements. Factors of importance to our risk position are the availability and price of raw materials, energy, starting products and intermediates. In particular, our raw material prices depend on exchange rates and the price of crude oil. Pricing and procurement risks are reduced through worldwide procurement and optimized processes to ensure immediate sourcing of additional raw material requirements. Costs for raw materials and energy have fluctuated significantly in past years and may continue to fluctuate in the future. We endeavor to reduce purchasing risks on the procurement markets through worldwide purchasing activities and optimized processes for the purchase of additional raw materials. Raw materials are purchased exclusively to cover our own requirements.
A significant portion of our volume of approximately 75%70% is sold based on formula-driven price adjustment mechanisms for changes in costs of raw materials. Sales prices under non-indexed contracts are reviewed on a quarterly basis to reflect raw material and market fluctuation. We believe that our contracts enable us to generally maintain our Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margins since the Acquisition. Beginning in 2016 we entered into limited short-term commodity derivatives for a specific carbon black oil grade.
Margins.
48
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
32


Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Table of Contents—Consolidated Financial StatementsPage
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms (PCAOB ID: 42 and PCAOB ID: 1251)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
4933


Orion Engineered Carbons S.A.
REPORTSREPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Orion Engineered Carbons S.A.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetssheet of Orion Engineered Carbons S.A. (the Company) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018,2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders'stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2019,2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2019 and 2018,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2019,2021, in conformity with the U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring OrganizationsOrganization of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 28, 202017, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits.audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our auditsaudit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our auditsaudit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our auditsaudit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accountsaccount or disclosuresdisclosure to which it relates.
Income Taxes – Uncertain Tax PositionsInventory Reserves- Valuation
Description of the Matter
As of December 31, 2021, the Company recognized $15.9 million of inventory reserves. As discussed in Note A and D of the financial statements, the Company records an adjustment to the cost basis of inventory when evidence exists that the net realizable value of inventory is lower than its cost, which occurs when the Company has excess or obsolete inventory. The Company operates in various countriesCompany's model to estimate excess or obsolete inventory is based on an analysis of existing inventory quantities compared to historical and fiscal jurisdictionsexpected future consumption. Expected future consumption is estimated based upon historical consumption, recent purchase volumes, product age and condition, and market factors.
Auditing management's reserves for excess or obsolete inventories involved significant auditor judgement because write-downs of inventories are based on subjective factors including inventory condition and projected sales and usage of inventory which are each subject to their respective localaffected by market and distinct tax regulations and recognizes uncertain tax positions as described in Note P ofeconomic conditions outside the consolidated financial statements. Auditing the Company´s recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions was complex due to significant estimates and judgment made by management in the assessment of the related tax matters. The Company´s estimates and judgment involve the interpretation of tax legislation, the evaluation of the risk of incorrect application of tax legislation and the evaluation of the applicability of tax case law and previous tax audit outcomes to current tax positions. Given the complexity and the subjective nature of the assessment of uncertain tax positions, evaluating management´s estimates relating to the determination of the uncertain tax positions requires extensive audit effort and a high degree of auditor judgment.Company’s control.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of the Company’s controls to recognize and measure uncertain tax positions. This included testinginternal controls over the completeness of uncertain tax positions and management’s reviewCompany's inventory reserve process. This included management's assessment of the estimatesassumptions and judgments described above. To testdata underlying the recognition and measurement of the Company’s uncertain tax positions, we performedinventory reserve.
Our substantive audit procedures that included, among others, assessing management’s methodologyevaluating the significant assumptions stated above and the accuracy and completeness and clerical accuracy of the underlying data management used by the Company in its analysis.to value excess or obsolete inventory. We involved our tax professionalscompared inventories on-hand to assist with our procedures. We evaluated the estimateshistorical usage and significant judgments made by management in determining the recognitionforecasts of future demand obtained from entity-specific and measurement of the uncertain tax positions recorded taking into consideration the Company’s correspondence with the relevant tax authorities, income tax opinions, and third-party advice. We tested the consistency of the Company’s estimates and judgments in determining its tax positions with relevant jurisdictional income tax regulation, applicable tax case law, previous tax audit outcomes and other relevantavailable market information. We also evaluatedperformed sensitivity analyses over the adequacy ofsignificant assumptions to evaluate the Company’s financial statement disclosures related to these tax matters.changes in the excess and obsolete inventory estimates that would result from changes in the underlying assumptions.

//s/
/s/Tobias Schlebusch/s/Titus Zwirner
WirtschaftsprüferWirtschaftsprüfer
(German Public Auditor)(German Public Auditor)
Ernst & Young GmbH WirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaftLLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2021.
Houston, TX
February 17, 2022
oec-20211231_g1.jpg34

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Orion Engineered Carbons S.A.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Orion Engineered Carbons S.A. (the Company) as of December 31, 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Ernst & Young GmbH
We have served as the Company’s auditor from 2011 to 2021
Cologne, Germany
February 20, 2020

18, 2021
50
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
35


51



Consolidated statements of operationsof Orion Engineered Carbons S.A.S.A

Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
201920182017202120202019
(In thousands, except per share amounts)(In millions, except share and per share amounts)
Net salesNet sales$1,476,353  $1,578,203  $1,328,297  Net sales$1,546.8 $1,136.4 $1,476.4 
Cost of salesCost of sales1,086,644  1,148,232  950,701  Cost of sales1,160.2 844.1 1,086.7 
Gross profitGross profit389,708  429,971  377,596  Gross profit386.6 292.3 389.7 
Selling, general and administrative expensesSelling, general and administrative expenses206,886  231,918  207,493  Selling, general and administrative expenses210.4 176.1 206.9 
Research and development costsResearch and development costs19,874  20,320  18,159  Research and development costs22.0 20.2 19.9 
Gain related to litigation settlementGain related to litigation settlement(82.9)— — 
Other expenses, netOther expenses, net12,169  6,061  7,581  Other expenses, net8.6 21.6 15.7 
Restructuring income—  40,253  —  
Restructuring expenses3,628  15,620  6,492  
Income from operationsIncome from operations147,151  196,305  137,871  Income from operations228.5 74.4 147.2 
Interest and other financial expense, netInterest and other financial expense, net27,572  28,642  44,135  Interest and other financial expense, net38.0 38.7 27.6 
Reclassification of actuarial losses from AOCIReclassification of actuarial losses from AOCI—  —  9,687  Reclassification of actuarial losses from AOCI4.8 9.9 — 
Income from operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of affiliated companies119,579  167,663  84,049  
Income before earnings in affiliated companies and income taxesIncome before earnings in affiliated companies and income taxes185.7 25.8 119.6 
Income tax expenseIncome tax expense33,216  46,944  19,736  Income tax expense51.7 8.1 33.3 
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax558  591  547  
Earnings in affiliated companies, net of taxEarnings in affiliated companies, net of tax0.7 0.5 0.6 
Net incomeNet income$86,920  $121,310  $64,860  Net income$134.7 $18.2 $86.9 
Weighted-average shares outstanding (in thousands of shares):Weighted-average shares outstanding (in thousands of shares):Weighted-average shares outstanding (in thousands of shares):
BasicBasic59,986  59,567  59,320  Basic60,708 60,430 59,986 
DilutedDiluted61,300  61,049  60,674  Diluted60,951 61,407 61,300 
Earnings per share (USD per share):
Earnings per shareEarnings per share
BasicBasic$1.45  $2.04  $1.09  Basic$2.22 $0.30 $1.45 
DilutedDiluted1.42  1.99  1.07  Diluted$2.21 $0.30 $1.42 
Dividends per share$0.80  $0.80  $0.77  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.


52
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
36


Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income of Orion Engineered Carbons S.A.

Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
201920182017202120202019
(In thousands)(In millions)
Net incomeNet income$86,920  $121,310  $64,860  Net income$134.7 $18.2 $86.9 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxOther comprehensive income (loss), net of taxOther comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Foreign currency translation adjustmentsForeign currency translation adjustments(1,632) (10,096) (4,932) Foreign currency translation adjustments(7.6)(14.3)(1.7)
Unrealized net gains/(losses) on hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation27  (269) 14,569  
Unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges(4,772) (4,077) (1,108) 
Gains/(losses) on defined benefit plans(8,358) 134  4,099  
Net gains (losses) on derivativesNet gains (losses) on derivatives2.7 (2.6)(4.6)
Gains (losses) on defined benefit plansGains (losses) on defined benefit plans5.1 2.5 (8.4)
Other comprehensive income (loss)Other comprehensive income (loss)(14,734) (14,308) 12,628  Other comprehensive income (loss)0.2 (14.4)(14.7)
Comprehensive incomeComprehensive income$72,186  $107,002  $77,488  Comprehensive income$134.9 $3.8 $72.2 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

53
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
37


Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Consolidated Balance Sheets of Orion Engineered Carbons S.A.
December 31December 31
2019201820212020
(In thousands, except share amounts)(In millions, except share amounts)
ASSETSASSETS
Current assetsCurrent assetsCurrent assets
Cash and cash equivalentsCash and cash equivalents$63,726  $57,016  Cash and cash equivalents$65.7 $64.9 
Accounts receivable, net of reserve for doubtful accounts
Accounts receivable, netAccounts receivable, net288.9 234.8 
of$6,632  and$5,081  212,565  262,821  
Other current financial assets11,347  12,573  
Inventories164,799  183,629  
Inventories, netInventories, net229.8 141.5 
Income tax receivablesIncome tax receivables17,924  24,342  Income tax receivables12.1 11.2 
Prepaid expenses and other current assetsPrepaid expenses and other current assets37,358  34,938  Prepaid expenses and other current assets68.5 48.1 
Total current assetsTotal current assets507,718  575,319  Total current assets665.0 500.5 
Property, plant and equipment - net534,054  483,534  
Operating lease right-of-use assets27,532  —  
Property, plant and equipment, netProperty, plant and equipment, net707.9 610.5 
Right-of-use assetsRight-of-use assets84.6 85.6 
GoodwillGoodwill77,341  55,546  Goodwill78.0 84.5 
Intangible assets - net50,596  95,245  
Intangible assets, netIntangible assets, net36.3 46.8 
Investment in equity method affiliatesInvestment in equity method affiliates5,232  5,332  Investment in equity method affiliates5.3 5.6 
Deferred income tax assetsDeferred income tax assets48,720  52,395  Deferred income tax assets50.4 52.6 
Other financial assets2,501  2,723  
Other assetsOther assets3,701  2,928  Other assets3.5 3.7 
Total non-current assetsTotal non-current assets749,676  697,703  Total non-current assets966.0 889.3 
Total assetsTotal assets$1,257,394  $1,273,022  Total assets$1,631.0 $1,389.8 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYLIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilitiesCurrent liabilitiesCurrent liabilities
Accounts payableAccounts payable$156,298  $163,585  Accounts payable$195.1 $131.2 
Current portion of long term debt and other financial liabilitiesCurrent portion of long term debt and other financial liabilities36,410  41,020  Current portion of long term debt and other financial liabilities151.7 82.6 
Current portion of employee benefit plan obligation908  855  
Accrued liabilitiesAccrued liabilities44,931  56,297  Accrued liabilities50.9 49.2 
Income taxes payableIncome taxes payable 14,154  28,086  Income taxes payable16.9 23.9 
Other current liabilitiesOther current liabilities32,509  30,493  Other current liabilities34.1 37.8 
Total current liabilitiesTotal current liabilities285,211  320,336  Total current liabilities448.7 324.7 
Long-term debt, netLong-term debt, net630,261  643,748  Long-term debt, net631.2 655.8 
Employee benefit plan obligationEmployee benefit plan obligation71,901  60,377  Employee benefit plan obligation74.4 83.3 
Deferred income tax liabilitiesDeferred income tax liabilities43,308  45,504  Deferred income tax liabilities61.8 38.8 
Other liabilitiesOther liabilities40,701  44,161  Other liabilities95.2 106.2 
Total non-current liabilitiesTotal non-current liabilities862.6 884.1 
Commitments and contingenciesCommitments and contingenciesNote R—  —  Commitments and contingencies0
Total non-current liabilities786,171  793,790  
Stockholders' equity
Stockholders' equity
Stockholders' equity
Common stockCommon stockCommon stock
Authorized: 65,035,579 and 89,452,626 shares with no par value
Issued – 60,729,289 and 60,035,579 shares with no par value
Outstanding – 60,224,147 and 59,518,498 shares85,032  84,254  
Less 505,142 and 517,081 shares of common treasury stock, at cost(8,515) (8,683) 
Authorized: 65,035,579 and 65,035,579 shares with no par valueAuthorized: 65,035,579 and 65,035,579 shares with no par value
Issued – 60,992,259 and 60,992,259 shares with no par valueIssued – 60,992,259 and 60,992,259 shares with no par value
Outstanding – 60,656,076 and 60,487,117 sharesOutstanding – 60,656,076 and 60,487,117 shares85.3 85.3 
Less 336,183 and 505,142 shares of common treasury stock, at costLess 336,183 and 505,142 shares of common treasury stock, at cost(6.3)(8.5)
Additional paid-in capitalAdditional paid-in capital65,562  63,544  Additional paid-in capital71.4 68.5 
Retained earningsRetained earnings78,296  39,409  Retained earnings217.8 84.4 
Accumulated other comprehensive lossAccumulated other comprehensive loss(34,362) (19,628) Accumulated other comprehensive loss(48.5)(48.7)
Total stockholders' equityTotal stockholders' equity186,013  158,896  Total stockholders' equity319.7 181.0 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equityTotal liabilities and stockholders' equity$1,257,394  $1,273,022  Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$1,631.0 $1,389.8 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Financial Statements.
54
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
38


Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of Orion Engineered Carbons S.A.
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
201920182017202120202019
(In thousands)(In millions)
Cash flows from operating activities:Cash flows from operating activities:Cash flows from operating activities:
Net incomeNet income$86,920  $121,310  $64,860  Net income$134.7 $18.2 $86.9 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment and amortization of intangible assets96,713  98,156  98,356  
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment and amortization of intangible assets and right of use assetsDepreciation of property, plant and equipment and amortization of intangible assets and right of use assets104.1 96.6 96.7 
Amortization of debt issuance costsAmortization of debt issuance costs2,082  2,220  4,171  Amortization of debt issuance costs4.1 2.1 2.1 
Share-based incentive compensationShare-based incentive compensation9,438  13,919  8,835  Share-based incentive compensation5.2 4.4 9.4 
Deferred tax (benefit)/provision15,826  (3,634) (7,667) 
Deferred tax (benefit) provisionDeferred tax (benefit) provision20.3 (12.2)15.9 
Foreign currency transactionsForeign currency transactions1,052  2,782  (14,402) Foreign currency transactions(11.5)(4.9)1.1 
Other operating non-cash items1,813  1,165  15,163  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of businesses acquired:
(Increase)/decrease in trade receivables45,412  (39,680) (15,885) 
(Increase)/decrease in inventories16,413  (31,406) (25,632) 
Increase/(decrease) in trade payables(12,036) 5,444  17,545  
Increase/(decrease) in provisions(10,375) (4,427) (12,317) 
Increase/(decrease) in tax liabilities(7,254) 4,843  (11,954) 
Increase/(decrease) in other assets and liabilities that cannot be allocated to investing or financing activities(14,497) (48,707) 26,666  
Reclassification of actuarial losses from AOCIReclassification of actuarial losses from AOCI4.8 9.9 — 
Other operating non-cash items, netOther operating non-cash items, net(1.8)0.1 1.8 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net:Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net:
Trade receivablesTrade receivables(67.6)(16.5)45.4 
InventoriesInventories(94.9)30.0 16.4 
Trade payablesTrade payables65.0 (18.7)(12.0)
Other provisionsOther provisions7.0 2.3 (10.4)
Income tax liabilitiesIncome tax liabilities(6.3)16.4 (7.3)
Other assets and liabilities, netOther assets and liabilities, net(17.9)(2.4)(14.5)
Net cash provided by operating activitiesNet cash provided by operating activities$231,507  $121,985  $147,739  Net cash provided by operating activities145.2 125.3 231.5 
Cash flows from investing activities:Cash flows from investing activities:Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash paid for the acquisition of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment$(155,848) $(116,157) $(90,282) 
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired—  (36,571) —  
Cash received from the disposal of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment—  64,672  —  
Acquisition of intangible assets and property, plant and equipmentAcquisition of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment(214.7)(144.9)(155.8)
Net cash used in investing activitiesNet cash used in investing activities$(155,848) $(88,056) $(90,282) Net cash used in investing activities(214.7)(144.9)(155.8)
Cash flows from financing activities:Cash flows from financing activities:Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from borrowings$—  $—  $11,890  
Payments for debt issue costs(1,721) (741) (5,327) 
Proceeds from long-term debt borrowingsProceeds from long-term debt borrowings213.4 — — 
Repayments of long-term debtRepayments of long-term debt(8,036) (8,288) (28,866) Repayments of long-term debt(213.0)(8.2)(8.0)
Cash inflows related to current financial liabilitiesCash inflows related to current financial liabilities96,956  48,963  11,652  Cash inflows related to current financial liabilities188.4 206.0 96.9 
Cash outflows related to current financial liabilitiesCash outflows related to current financial liabilities(101,303) (26,370) (12,141) Cash outflows related to current financial liabilities(112.6)(171.1)(101.3)
Dividends paid to shareholdersDividends paid to shareholders(48,033) (47,665) (45,705) Dividends paid to shareholders— (12.0)(48.1)
Repurchase of common stock—  (4,926) —  
Taxes paid for shares issued under net settlement feature(6,475) (4,741) —  
Net cash used in financing activities$(68,612) $(43,768) $(68,497) 
Other financing activitiesOther financing activities(2.9)(1.2)(8.1)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activitiesNet cash provided by (used in) financing activities73.3 13.5 (68.6)
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cashIncrease (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$7,047  $(9,839) $(11,040) Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash3.8 (6.1)7.1 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the beginning of the periodCash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the beginning of the period61,604  75,213  80,480  Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the beginning of the period67.9 68.2 61.6 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cashEffect of exchange rate changes on cash(420) (3,770) 5,773  Effect of exchange rate changes on cash(3.2)5.8 (0.5)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the end of the periodCash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the end of the period$68,231  $61,604  $75,213  Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the end of the period68.5 67.9 68.2 
Less restricted cash at the end of the periodLess restricted cash at the end of the period4,505  4,588  2,929  Less restricted cash at the end of the period2.8 3.0 4.5 
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the periodCash and cash equivalents at the end of the period$63,726  $57,016  $72,284  Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period$65.7 $64.9 $63.7 
Cash paid for interest, netCash paid for interest, net$(20,399)$(24,367) $(25,905) Cash paid for interest, net$(22.8)$(20.8)$(20.4)
Cash paid for income taxesCash paid for income taxes$(24,106)$(60,228) $(39,549) Cash paid for income taxes$(37.6)$(7.9)$(24.1)
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:
Liabilities under build-to-suit lease$—  $28,657  $—  
Liabilities for leasing - current$6,254  $—  $—  
Liabilities for leasing - non-current$26,280  $—  $—  
Lease liabilitiesLease liabilities$11.6 $66.6 $32.6 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Financial Statements.
55
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
39


Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity of Orion Engineered Carbons S.A.

Common stockCommon stock
(In thousands, except per share amounts)Number of common sharesAmountTreasury sharesAddi-tional
paid-in
capital
Retained
earnings
Accumulated other compre-hensive lossTotal equity
As at January 1, 201759,320,214  $83,770  $(3,773) $139,399  $(146,761) $(17,948) $54,687  
Net income—  —  —  —  64,860  —  64,860  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax—  —  —  —  —  12,628  12,628  
Distributions from additional paid-in capital—  —  —  (45,705) —  —  (45,705) 
$0.77  per share
Share based compensation—  —  —  8,835  —  —  8,835  
As at December 31, 201759,320,214  83,770  (3,773) 102,529  (81,901) (5,320) 95,305  
(In millions, except share and per share amounts)(In millions, except share and per share amounts)NumberAmountTreasury sharesAdditional
paid-in
capital
Retained
earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive lossTotal
As of January 1, 2019As of January 1, 201959,518,498 $84.2 $(8.7)$63.6 $39.4 $(19.6)$158.9 
Net incomeNet income—  —  —  —  121,310  —  121,310  Net income— — — — 86.9 — 86.9 
Other comprehensive loss, net of taxOther comprehensive loss, net of tax—  —  —  —  —  (14,308) (14,308) Other comprehensive loss, net of tax— — — — — (14.7)(14.7)
Distributions from additional paid-in capital—  —  —  (47,665) —  —  (47,665) 
$0.80  per share
Share buyback(206,501) —  (4,926) —  —  —  (4,926) 
Share based compensation—  —  —  8,680  —  —  8,680  
Issuance of stock under equity compensation plans404,785  484  16  —  —  —  500  
As at December 31, 201859,518,498  84,254  (8,683) 63,544  39,409  (19,628) 158,896  
Net income—  —  —  —  86,920  —  86,920  
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax—  —  —  —  —  (14,734) (14,734) 
Dividends paid -$0.80  per share  —  —  —  —  (48,033) —  (48,033) 
Dividends -Dividends -$0.80per share— — — — (48.1)— (48.1)
Share based compensationShare based compensation—  —  —  2,018  —  —  2,018  Share based compensation— — — 2.0 — — 2.0 
Issuance of stock under equity compensation plansIssuance of stock under equity compensation plans705,649  778  168  —  —  —  946  Issuance of stock under equity compensation plans705,649 0.8 0.2 — — — 1.0 
As at December 31, 201960,224,147  $85,032  $(8,515) $65,562  $78,296  $(34,362) $186,013  
As of December 31, 2019As of December 31, 201960,224,147 85.0 (8.5)65.6 78.2 (34.3)186.0 
Net incomeNet income— — — — 18.2 — 18.2 
Other comprehensive loss, net of taxOther comprehensive loss, net of tax— — — — — (14.4)(14.4)
Dividends -Dividends -$0.20per share— — — — (12.0)— (12.0)
Share based compensationShare based compensation— — — 2.9 — — 2.9 
Issuance of stock under equity compensation plansIssuance of stock under equity compensation plans262,970 0.3 — — — — 0.3 
As of December 31, 2020As of December 31, 202060,487,117 85.3 (8.5)68.5 84.4 (48.7)181.0 
Net incomeNet income— — — — 134.7 — 134.7 
Other comprehensive income, net of taxOther comprehensive income, net of tax— — — — — 0.2 0.2 
Dividends -Dividends -$0.02per share— — — — (1.3)— (1.3)
Share based compensationShare based compensation— — — 5.1 — — 5.1 
Issuance of stock under equity compensation plansIssuance of stock under equity compensation plans168,959 — 2.2 (2.2)— — — 
As of December 31, 2021As of December 31, 202160,656,076 $85.3 $(6.3)$71.4 $217.8 $(48.5)$319.7 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.


56oec-20211231_g1.jpg40

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Table of Contents—NotesPage
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
41


Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
57



Note A. Significant Accounting Policies    
Orion’s audited consolidated financial statements comprise Orion and its subsidiaries (the “Orion Group”Engineered Carbons S.A. (“Orion”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, “our”, or the “Group”“OEC”) is a Luxembourg joint stock corporation (société anonyme or the “Company”S.A.), incorporated on July 28, 2014 as a Luxembourg limited liability company (société à responsabilité limitée). The Company's fiscal year comprises the period from January 1 to December 31, 2019.
Principles of Consolidation
The Company’s audited consolidated financial statements are prepared in US Dollars, the presentation currency of the Company. Except where stated otherwise, all figures are presented in thousands of US Dollars.
The consolidated financial statementsaccompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared, in U.S. Dollars, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP” or “GAAP”). The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of America (“GAAP”).
AdoptionOrion Engineered Carbons S.A. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and majority-owned and controlled entities. Subsidiaries are defined as being those companies over which we, either directly or indirectly, have control through a majority of accounting standards
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). Undervoting rights or the amendments in ASU 2016-02, lessees are required to recognize (i) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and (ii) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, orexercise control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, to provide an additional (and optional) transition method with which to adopt ASU 2016-02. In July 2018, the FASB also issued ASU 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases, to clarify the codification more generally and/or to correct unintended application of guidance. More recently, in March 2019,obtain the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-01, Leases (Topic 842): Codification Improvements, which was also issued to clarify the codification more generally and/or to correct unintended application of guidance. ASU 2019-01 clarifies transition disclosure requirements upon adoption of Topic 842. We adopted ASUs 2016-02, 2018-11, 2018-10 and 2019-01 (“Lease ASUs”) as of January 1, 2019 using the optional transition method under ASU 2018-11 that allows for a cumulative-effect adjustment in the period of adoption without restating prior periods. Orion elected the practical expedients upon transition to retain the lease classification and initial direct costs for any leases that existed prior to adoptionmajority of the standard. As a result of adopting these Lease ASUs we recorded additional lease assetsbenefits and liabilities of approximately $30 million and $31 million on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2019. Additionally, upon adoption of ASU 2016-02 we de-recognized 1 asset previously recorded under build-to-suit accounting and its associated liability of $29 million. A right-of-use asset will be capitalized upon subsequent commencementexposed to the majority of the lease. Refer to Note C. Leases for further information about adoption of Topic 842.
In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-16, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes. The amendments in the update permit use of the OIS rate based on SOFR as a U.S. benchmark interest rate. Including the OIS rate based on SOFR as an eligible benchmark interest rate during the early stages of the marketplace transition will facilitate the LIBOR to SOFR transition and provide sufficient lead time for entities to prepare for changes to interest rate risk hedging strategies for both risk management and accounting purposes. The new standard is required to be adopted concurrently with the amendments in ASU 2017-12, and early adoption is permitted if an entity has already adopted ASU 2017-12. The Company adopted ASU 2018-16 concurrently with ASU 2017-12 as of January 1, 2019. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, that modifies the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements made in accordance with Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, based on the concepts in the Concepts Statement, including the consideration of costs and benefits. The new guidance removes requirements to disclose the amount of and reason for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the policy for timing of transfers between levels and the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company early adopted ASU 2018-13 as of January 1, 2019. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company's financial statements.
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which allows for the elimination of the stranded income tax effects resulting from the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act through a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2018-02 as of January 1, 2019. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company's financial statements.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, that amends the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements under hedge accounting. The new standard will make more financial and non-financial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting, amends the presentation and disclosure requirements, and simplifies how companies assess effectiveness. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those years, and early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-12 as of January 1, 2019. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
58



In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses. The new guidance requires the Company to measure all expected credit losses for financial instruments held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including all interim periods within those years, and early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 as of January 1, 2019. The adoption of this guidance and recognition of a loss allowance at an amount equal to lifetime expected credit losses for trade receivables was immaterial and did not result in a transition adjustment on retained earnings.

Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include all subsidiaries indirectly or directly controlled by Orion. Entitiesrisks. Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date Orion obtains control,on which generally is the acquisition date, and are deconsolidated when control is lost.obtained until the date that such control ceases.
Control is achieved when Orion is exposed, or has the right, to variable returns from its involvement with the investeeAll intercompany transactions and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee. Orion re-assesses whether or not it controls an investee if facts and circumstances indicate that there are changes to one or more of these three elements of control.
Orion consolidated financial statements are preparedbalances have been eliminated in accordance with uniform accounting policies. Income and expenses, intercompany profits and losses, and receivables and liabilities between consolidated subsidiaries are eliminated.consolidation.
Use of estimatesEstimates and Assumptions
The preparation of consolidatedWe make estimates, and assumptions to prepare our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make certainGAAP. Those estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assetswe report in our Consolidated Financial Statements and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported period. Actualaccompanying Notes. Our actual results could differ from those estimates.estimates, and variances could materially affect our financial condition and results of operations in future periods.
Foreign currency translation
Foreign currency transactions are measured atEvents surrounding the exchange rate at the date of initial recognition. Any gains or losses resulting from the valuation of foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities using the currency exchange rates as at the reporting date are recognized in other expenses, net. Other operating income from currency translation amountedCOVID-19 pandemic continue to 0 in 2019, $0.3 million in 2018 and $0.1 million in 2017. Other operating expenses from currency translation amounted to 0 in 2019, $0.1 million in 2018 and 0 in 2017.
Currency exchange differences relating to financing activities are recognized in interest and other financial income and interest and other financial expense.
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations with functional currencies different from the presentation currency U.S. dollars are translated using closing rates as at the reporting date. Income and expense items are translated at averagemonthly exchange rates for the respective period. The translation of equity is performed using historical exchange rates. The overall foreign currency impact from translating the statement of financial position and income statement of all the foreign entities is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI").
Revenue and income recognition
OEC recognizes revenue when or as it satisfies a performance obligation by transferring a good or a service to a customer. Revenue is only recognized when control is transferred to the customer. The amount of consideration we receive and revenue we recognize is based upon the terms stated in the sales contract, which may contain variable consideration such as discounts or rebates. We also give our customers a limited right to return product that has been damaged, does not satisfy their specifications, or other specific reasons. Payment terms on product sales to our customers typically range from 30 to 90 days. Although certain exceptions exist where standard payment terms are exceeded, these instances are infrequent and do not exceed one year.
Revenue is recognized according to the five-step model proscribed in ASC 606. Under the first step, the entity has to identify the contract entered with a customer granting the right to receive goods or service in exchange for consideration. The second step requires the identification of distinct performance obligations within a contract. The transaction price of the arrangement is defined in Step 3 of ASC 606. In addition to the contractual fixed price the entity has to take variable considerations into account. If the entity identified more than one separate performance obligation under step 2, it has to account for this contract as a multiple element arrangement resulting in an allocation of revenues to the obligations identified. If these conditions are satisfied, revenue from the sale of goods is recognized when control have been transferred to the buyer, either at a point in time, or over time.
The Company records a provision for warranty costs, based on historical trends of warranty costs incurred as a percentage of sales, which management has determined to be a reasonable estimate of the probable losses to be incurred for warranty claims in a period.
The Company derives substantial majority of revenues by selling carbon black to industrial customers for further processing. Revenue recognition and measurement is governed by the following principles. The amount of revenue, the transactions price, is
59



contractually specified between the parties and is measured at the amount expected be received less value-added tax and any trade discounts and volume rebates granted. Discounts and volume rebates are accounted for as estimates of variable consideration and deducted from revenue.
With respect to the sale of goods, sales are recognized at the point in time control over the good transfers to the customer. The timing of the transfer of control varies depending on the individual terms of the sales agreement.
Shipping and handling costs incurred in connection with the satisfaction of performance obligations are accounted for as fulfillment activities rather than separate performance obligations.
Interest income is recognized using the effective interest method.
Cost of sales
Cost of Sales consists of the raw and packaging materials, direct manufacturing costs, depreciation, inspection costs, inbound freight cost and shipping, internal handling costs and other overhead expenses necessary to manufacture the products.
Selling and administrative expenses
Selling and administrative expenses consist of salaries and other compensation benefits of sales and office personnel, general office expenses and other expenses not directly related to manufacturing operations.
Research and development costs
Research and development costs include salaries, equipment and material expenditures, and contractor fees and are expensed as incurred.
Income taxes
Current income tax receivables and liabilities are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. They are calculated based on the tax rates and tax laws that are enacted on the reporting date.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between financial statement carrying amountsevolve and the tax basesfinancial statements impact cannot be predicted. We continue to assess the potential financial statements impacts on our operational and financial performance. COVID-19 could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of existing assetsoperations, access to sources of liquidity and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that realization of those assets is considered to be more likely than not. They are measured using statutory tax rates that are expected to apply to taxable income in the jurisdictions and years when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates that are enacted at the reporting date. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
A valuation allowance is established for deferred taxes when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Orion records benefits for uncertain tax positions based on the assessment of whether the position is more likely than not to be sustained by taxing authorities. If the threshold is not met, no tax benefit of the uncertain tax position is recognized. If the threshold is met, the tax benefit that is recognized is the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The analysis presumes the taxing authorities' full knowledge of the positions taken and all relevant facts, but does not consider the time value of money. The Company also accrues for interest and penalties on its uncertain tax positions and included such charges in its income tax provision in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.financial condition.
Cash, cash equivalentsCash Equivalents and restricted cashRestricted Cash
Cash and cash equivalents comprise bank balances, checks and cash on hand. Theyhand and include all highly liquid investments with a maturitymaturities of three monthsthree-months or less at the date of acquisition.purchase. We record cash and cash equivalents as restricted when we are unable to freely use such cash and cash equivalents for our general operating purposes.
Restricted cash comprises cash which is not available for immediate use and may not be utilized for any purpose until a certain event or events take place. A designation for short-term or long-termmajority of our restricted cash is made based on the expected time of release or distribution.
60



Cash,and cash equivalents serves as cash collateral deposits, voluntary and restricted cashor mandatory, for December 31, 2019third-party bank guarantees. See Note J. Debt and 2018 reconciles as follows:
December 31
20192018
(In thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents$63,726  $57,016  
Restricted cash included in other assets and liabilities4,505  4,588  
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in the statement of cash flows$68,231  $61,604  
Restrictions result from mandatory and voluntary pledges to secure certain guarantee amounts.Other Obligations for further discussion.
Accounts and notes receivablesNotes Receivables
Trade receivablesAccounts receivable are recordedamounts due from customers for merchandise sold or services performed in the ordinary course of business and are carried at the invoiced amount and generally do not bear interest. Orion monitors and evaluates collectabilitytransaction price net of receivables on an ongoing basis and considers whether an allowance for doubtful accountscredit losses. Allowance for credit losses is necessary. Trade receivablesmeasured using historical loss rates for the respective risk categories and incorporating forward-looking estimates. The corresponding expense for the credit loss allowance is reflected in China may at certain times be settled with the receipt of bank issued non-interest bearing notes.
Financial instruments
Orion’s financial instruments consist primarily of cashSelling, general and cash equivalents, trade receivables, loans, miscellaneous financial assets, term loan, local bank loans, trade payables and derivative instruments. The carrying values of Orion’s financial instruments approximate fair value with the exception of variable rate long-term debt, which is recorded at amortized cost. The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are based on quoted market prices, if such prices are available. In situations where quoted market prices are not available, the Company relies on valuation models to derive fair value. Such valuation takes into account the ability of the financial counterparty to perform and the Company’s own credit risk.
The Company uses derivative financial instruments primarily for purposes of hedging the exposures to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, which exist as part of its ongoing business operations. Orion does not enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes, nor does it hold or issue any derivative contracts for trading purposes. All derivatives are recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. Where the Company has a legal right to offset derivative settlements under a master netting agreement with a counterparty, derivatives with that counterparty are presented on a net basis. The changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded in either earnings or AOCI, depending on whether or not the instrument is designated as part of a hedge transaction and, if designated as part of a hedge transaction, the type of hedge transaction. The gains or losses on derivative instruments reported in AOCI are reclassified to earnings in the period in which earnings are affected by the underlying hedged item. The ineffective portion of all hedges is recognized in earnings during the period in which the ineffectiveness occurs.
In accordance with Orion’s risk management strategy, the Company may enter into certain derivative instruments that may not be designated as hedges for hedge accounting purposes. Although these derivatives are not designated as hedges, the Company believes that such instruments are closely correlated with the underlying exposure, thus managing the associated risk. The Company records in earnings the gains or losses from changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges. Cash movements associated with these instruments are presentedadministrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as Cash Flows from Operating Activities because the derivativesOperations. Past due balances are designed to mitigate risk to the Company’s cash flow from operations. The cash flows related to the principal amount of outstanding debt instruments are presented in the Cash Flows from Financing Activities section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Concentrations ofwritten-off against credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of an unexpected loss if a customer or third party to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, derivative instruments and undrawn amounts under the Revolving Credit Facility.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are defined as cash on hand, demand deposits with financial institutions, and short-term liquid investments with an initial maturity date of less than three months. Our cash in demand deposit accounts may exceed federally insured limits and could be negatively impacted if the underlying financial institutions fail or are subject to other adverse conditions in the financial markets. Credit risk is mitigated as we place the cash mainly with our defined core banks which are major financial institutions enjoying investment grade long-term credit ratings. To date, we have not experienced a loss or diminished access to cash in our demand deposit accounts.
Accounts receivable
Our trade accounts receivable are subject to concentrations of credit risk with customers primarily in our Rubber Carbon Black segment. During 2019, sales to our ten largest customers within our Rubber Carbon Black segment accounted for approximately 66.1% of
61



total consolidated segment revenues. Sales to our ten largest customers within our Specialty Carbon Black segment accounted for approximately 27.7% of total consolidated segment revenues (alternatively, our top ten customers represent 52.7% of total Company's sales volume). A default in payment, a material reduction in purchases from these or any other large customers, or the loss of a large customer or customer groups could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. In addition, trade receivables are subject to concentrations of credit risk with customers of specific industries which can be affected by a downturn in the economy. We estimate the receivables for which we do not expect full collection based on historical collection rates and ongoing evaluations of the creditworthiness of our customers including considerations of future macroeconomic expectations. An allowance is recorded in our consolidated financial statements for these estimated amounts. The concentration of customer credit risk is mitigated by the size and diversity of the customer base as well as its geographic dispersion.
Derivative instruments
By using derivative instruments, Orion is subject to credit risk. If a counterparty fails to fulfill its performance obligations under a derivative contract, Orion’s credit risk will equal the fair value of the derivative. Generally, when the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes Orion, thus creating a payment risk for Orion. The Company minimizes counterparty credit (or repayment) risk by entering into transactions with major financial institutions enjoying investment grade long-term credit ratings. No significant concentration of credit risk existed as of December 31, 2019.
Undrawn amounts under the Revolving Credit Facility
The Company has a €175.0 million syndicated Revolving Credit Facility, originally dated July 25, 2014, in placeaccounts are deemed no longer to cover short-term Working Capital requirements. The Revolving Credit Facility syndicate is comprised of 10 national and international banks. Currently a major part of the Revolving Credit Facility is still undrawn. If a Revolving Credit Facility lender fails to fulfill its performance obligations (especially with respect to making funds available) under the credit agreement, Orion’s credit risk comprises a potential cash shortage/refinancing risk amounting to the respective bank's commitment amount. With regard to the allocation of the total Revolving Credit Facility amount of €175.0 million to the 10 major financial institutions (highest single commitment is €24.0 million), all with investment grade long-term credit ratings, there is no significant concentration of credit risk as of December 31, 2019.be collectible.
Inventories
Inventories are statedThe Company values inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The cost of inventories (raw materials, consumables and supplies) that have a similar nature or use is assigned byvalue using the weighted average cost method. Amounts are removed from inventory usingWe periodically evaluate the average cost.
Inventory is reviewed for both potential obsolescence and potential declines in net realizable value periodically. In this review,of inventories based primarily upon their age, but also upon assumptions are made about theof future usage in production, customer demand for, and market conditions. Inventories have been reduced to the lower of cost or net realizable value of, the inventory and based on these assumptions the amount of any obsolete,by allowances for slow moving or overvalued inventory is estimated. Orion writes downobsolete goods. If actual circumstances are less favorable than those projected by management in its evaluation of the net realizable value of these inventories, by an amount equal to the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated net realizable value.
Investments
The Company has an investment in DGW (Kommanditgesellschaft Deutsche Gasrußwerke GmbH & Co) and DGW GmbH (Kommanditgesellschaft Deutsche Gasrußwerke GmbH & Co) that is determined to not be a Variable Interest Entity and is accounted for using the equity method. The equity method is used to account for investments in affiliates in which the Company has the ability to exert significant influence over the affiliates’ operating and financial policies.
Intangible assets and goodwill
The Company records tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations under the acquisition method of accounting. Amounts paid for an acquisition are allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values at the date of acquisition. The determination of the fair value of intangible assets requires the use of significant judgment with regard to assumptions used in the valuation model. The Company estimates the fair value of identifiable acquisition-related intangible assets principally based on projections of cash flows that will arise from these assets. The projected cash flows are discounted to determine the fair value of the assets at the dates of acquisition. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred and included in other expenses, net.
When the Company acquires a business, it assesses the financial assets and liabilities assumed for appropriate classification and designation in accordance with the contractual terms, economic circumstances and pertinent conditions as at the acquisition date. This includes the separation of embedded derivatives in host contracts by the acquiree.
Any contingent consideration to be transferred by the acquirer is recognized at fair value at the acquisition date.
Goodwill is comprised of the purchase price of business acquisitions in excess of the fair value assigned to the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired (being the excess of the aggregate of i) the consideration transferred, ii) the amount recognized for non-controlling interest and iii) any previous interest held over the net assets acquired, over the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed).
62



At the date of acquisition the goodwill is allocated to those reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination even if no other assets or liabilities of the acquiree are assigned to that reporting unit. 
Intangible assets acquired separately are recognized initially at cost. The cost of intangible assets acquired in a business combination is their fair value at the date of acquisition.
Intangible assets with finite useful lives, which are comprised of trademarks, customer relationships and developed technologies, are amortized over their estimated useful lives and, if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, tested for impairment, see below in this note under “Impairment test“. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but are tested for impairment at least once a year. The useful lives of intangible assets are also re-assessed once a year.
Technology and patents (including capitalized development costs), trademarks and other intangible assets are amortized straight line over a useful life of 15 years. Other intangible assets are amortized straight line over a useful life of 3 to 10 years.
Customer relationships acquired in business combinations in 2011 from Evonik and in 2018 from SN2A are amortized over their useful life. The useful life is estimated on the basis of contractual arrangements and historical values and is approximately 8 and 15 years, respectively. The amortization amount is based on the economic life and the probability of continuing the customer relationship in the form of a churn rate.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets and other intangible assets with finite useful lives
The Company assesses long-lived assets such as property, plant and equipment and other intangible assets with finite useful lives for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset, an asset group or reporting units (“RU's”) may not be recoverable.
Long-lived assets to be held and used are assessed for possible impairment by comparing their carrying values with their associated undiscounted, future net cash flows. Events that can trigger assessments for possible impairments include significant decreases in the market value of an asset, significant change in the extent or manner of use of or a physical change in an asset, and a more-likely-than-not expectation that a long-lived asset or asset group will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly sooner than the end of its previously estimated useful life.
To test for impairment of assets, Orion generally uses a probability-weighted estimate of the future undiscounted net cash flows of the related assets over their remaining lives to determine if the value of the asset is recoverable. Long-lived assets are grouped with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which independent identifiable cash flows are determinable.
An asset impairment is recognized when the carrying value of the asset is not recoverable based on the analysis described above, in which case the asset is written down to its fair value. Anyadditional write-downs are treated as permanent reductions in the carrying amount of the assets.
If the asset does not have a readily determinable market value, a discounted cash flow model may be used to determine the fair value of the asset. In circumstances when an asset does not have separate identifiable cash flows, an impairment charge is recorded when the Company no longer intends to use the asset. An impairment loss may not be reversed if the fair value of the impaired asset or asset group increases subsequently.required.
Impairment of goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the net amount of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination measured at fair value. Goodwill is not amortized, but instead tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter based on September 30 actual results, as well as whenever there are events or changes in circumstances (triggering events) which suggest that the carrying amount exceeds the fair value.
Impairment of goodwill is tested at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment (referred to as a component). A component of an operating segment is required to be identified as a reporting unit if the component is a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews its operating results. At the date of the annual impairment test Orion had 2 reporting units to which the goodwill was allocated. Goodwill impairment test was performed at the level of the 2 reporting units, Rubber Carbon Black and Specialty Carbon Black representing the 2 operating segments. These 2 reporting units were defined as Orion has the possibility to switch capacities as well as products between its various locations.
Goodwill impairment is recorded only after performing a qualitative impairment test indicates a potential impairment. If the carrying amount of the reporting units to which the goodwill is allocated exceeds the reporting unit's fair value an impairment loss is recorded. An impairment loss is the excess of the reporting units carrying amount over its fair value.
63



Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at historical cost. Historical cost less accumulated depreciation.includes expenditures that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the items. Costs may also include borrowing costs incurred on debt during construction of major projects exceeding one year, costs of major maintenance arising from turnarounds of major units and committed decommissioning costs. Expenditures for major renewals and improvements, which significantly extend the useful lives of the existing property, plant and equipment, are capitalized and depreciated.
Routine maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of assets. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the expected useful lives of the related assets. The depreciable lives for Buildings, Plant and machinery as well as Furniture, fixtures and office equipment are between 5 and 50 years, 3 and 25 years, and 3 and 25 years, respectively. The cost and accumulated depreciation for
oec-20211231_g1.jpg42

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Land is not depreciated.
We evaluate property, plant and equipment sold, retired,for impairment whenever events or otherwise disposedchanges in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Long-lived assets are removedgrouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets, which, for us, is generally at the plant group level. If it is determined that an asset or asset group’s undiscounted future cash flows will not be sufficient to recover the carrying amount, the asset is written down to its estimated fair value.
Gain or loss on retirement or sale of property, plant and equipment is reflected in Other expenses, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Business Combination
We recognize and measure the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date, with any difference compared to the purchase consideration recorded as goodwill or gain on bargain purchase. Subsequent to the acquisition, and no later than one year from the Consolidated Balance Sheetsacquisition date, we may record adjustments to the estimated fair values of assets acquired and resulting gainsliabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill, to reflect new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date. Thereafter, subsequent adjustments of the estimated fair values are recorded to earnings. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred.
Goodwill
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually as of September 30, 2021 or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit with goodwill is below its carrying amount.
We first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Qualitative factors assessed for each of the reporting units include, but are not limited to, changes in long-term commodity prices, discount rates, competitive environments, planned capacity, cost factors such as raw material prices, and financial performance of the reporting units. If the qualitative assessment indicates that it is more likely than not that the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, a quantitative test is required. If the carrying value of the reporting unit including goodwill exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge equal to the excess would be recognized up to a maximum amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.
For 2021, we performed qualitative impairment assessments of our reporting units, which indicated that the fair value of our reporting units was more likely than not greater than their carrying value. Based on this assessment, a quantitative goodwill impairment test was not required.
For 2020, we elected to proceed directly to the quantitative goodwill impairment test, which indicated that the fair value of our reporting units was greater than their carrying value including goodwill.
No goodwill impairment was recognized in 2021 and 2020.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets, which are comprised of trade names and trademarks, customer relationships, developed technologies and software costs. These assets are amortized, using the straight-line method, over their estimated useful lives of 3-15 years or over the term of the related agreement. The useful lives of intangibles related to customer relationships acquired in business combinations are estimated on the basis of contractual arrangements and the probability of a continuing relationship.
We evaluate definite-lived intangible assets with the associated long-lived asset group for impairment whenever impairment indicators are present, such as a significant reduction in cash flows associated with the assets.
Investments in Equity Method Affiliates
We account for equity investments (“equity investments”) using the equity method of accounting if we have the ability to exercise significant influence over, but not control of, an investee. Significant influence generally exists if we have an ownership interest representing between 20% and 50% voting rights. Under the equity method of accounting, investments are stated initially at cost and are adjusted for subsequent additional investments and our proportionate share of profit or losses and distributions.
We record our share of the profit or losses of the equity method investments, net of income taxes, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. When our share of losses in an equity investment equals or exceeds our interest in the equity investment, including any other unsecured receivables, we do not recognize further losses, unless we have incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the equity investment.
We evaluate our equity method investments for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate, in our management’s judgment, that the carrying value of such investments may have experienced other-than-temporary decline in value. When evidence of loss in value has occurred, we compare the estimated fair value of investment to the carrying value of investment to determine whether an
oec-20211231_g1.jpg43

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
impairment has occurred. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying value and our management considers the decline in value to be other-than-temporary, the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value is recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements as an impairment.
We have an investment in Kommanditgesellschaft Deutsche Gasrußwerke GmbH & Co and Kommanditgesellschaft Deutsche Gasrußwerke GmbH & Co, (together “DGW”), which is accounted for using the equity method.
Income Taxes
The income tax for the period comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, except to the extent that it relates to items recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity. In these cases, the applicable tax amount is recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity, respectively.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, as well as the net tax effects of tax carryforwards. Valuation allowances are provided against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
We recognize uncertain income tax positions in our financial statements when we believe it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the position or a portion thereof will be sustained upon examination. For a position that is more likely than not to be sustained, the benefit recognized is measured at the largest cumulative amount that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized.
Other Provisions
Asset retirement obligations—At some sites, we are contractually obligated to decommission our plants upon site exit. Asset retirement obligations are recorded at the present value of the estimated costs to retire the asset at the time the obligation is incurred. That cost, which is capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset, is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the remaining useful life of the related asset. Accretion expense in connection with the discounted liability is also recognized over the remaining useful life of the related asset.
Environmental provisionsWe accrue for environmental remediation costs and other obligations when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and we can reasonably estimate the amount. The amount accrued reflects our assumptions about remediation requirements at the contaminated site, the nature of the remedy, the outcome of discussions with regulatory agencies and other potentially responsible parties at multi-party sites, and the number and financial viability of other potentially responsible parties. We do not reduce its estimated liability for possible recoveries from insurance carriers. Proceeds from insurance carriers are recorded when realized by either the receipt of cash or a contractual agreement. We determine the timing and amount of any liability based upon assumptions regarding future events. Inherent uncertainties exist in such evaluations primarily due to unknown conditions and other circumstances, changing governmental regulations and legal standards regarding liability, and evolving technologies. We adjust these liabilities periodically as remediation efforts progress or as additional technical or legal information becomes available.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
This concentration of customers may impact our overall exposure to credit risk, either positively or negatively, in that our customers may be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions. In addition, we and many of our customers operate worldwide and are therefore exposed to risks associated with the economic and political forces of various countries and geographic areas. We generally do not obtain any collateral for our receivables. See Note R. Segment Financial Information to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about our operations in different geographic areas.
Foreign Currency Translation
Functional and Reporting Currency—Items included in the financial information of each of Orion’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (“the functional currency”) and then translated to the U.S. dollar (“the reporting currency”) as follows:
Assets and liabilities for each balance sheet presented are translated at the closing rate at the date of that balance sheet;
Income and expenses for each income statement are translated at monthly average exchange rates; and
All resulting exchange differences are recognized as a separate component within Other comprehensive income (foreign currency translation adjustments).
Transactions and Balances—Foreign currency transactions are recorded in their respective functional currency using exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Exchange gains and losses, resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at period-end exchange rates, are recognized in Interest and other expenses,financial expense, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Expenditures
oec-20211231_g1.jpg44

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Revenue Recognition
We recognizes revenue when the customers obtain control of promised goods or services. The revenue recognized is the amount of consideration which we expect to receive in exchange for repairsthose goods or services. Our contracts with customers are generally for products only and maintenancedo not include other performance obligations. Generally, we consider purchase orders, which in some cases are chargedgoverned by master supply agreements, to expensesbe contracts with customers. The transaction price as incurred. Expendituresspecified on the purchase order or sales contract is considered the standalone selling price for major renewals and betterments,each distinct product. To determine the transaction price at the time when revenue is recognized, we evaluate whether the price is subject to adjustments, such as for discounts or volume rebates, which significantly extendare stated in the useful livescustomer contract, to determine the net consideration to which we expect to be entitled.
Revenue from product sales is recognized based on a point in time model when control of the existing property, plant and equipment, are capitalized and depreciated.
Leases
In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and a lease liability for all leases with terms greater than 12 months and also requires disclosures by lessees and lessors about the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. Leases with terms of 12 month or less (i.e., short-term leases) were allowed to be exempted from Topic 842 through a recognition and measurement exemption, if elected. Orion does not have any short-term leases. Subsequentproduct is transferred to the issuancecustomer, which typically occurs upon shipment or delivery of Topic 842, the FASB clarified the guidance through several ASUs; hereinafter, the collection of lease guidance is referred to as “ASC 842.”
A lease is an agreement whereby the lessor conveysproduct to the lessee in return for a payment or series of payments the right to use an asset for an agreed period of time. Under ASC 842, leases are either finance leases or operating leases. The Company mainly acts as a lessee in operating leases. Operating leases are all leases that do not qualify as finance leases (leases where, in accordance with the contractual terms, the lessee substantially bears all the riskscustomer and title, risk and rewards of ownership have passed to the customer.
Taxes collected on sales to customers are excluded from the transaction price.
Shipping and handling activities that occur after the transfer of control to the asset). Leasescustomer are billed to customers and are recorded as assets by discountingsales revenue, as we consider these to be fulfillment costs. Shipping and handling costs are expensed in the minimum future lease payments while this discounted minimum obligation is recorded asperiod incurred and included in Selling, general and administration expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Payment terms on product sales to our customers typically range from 30 to 90 days. When the associated lease liability.

On January 1, 2019, we adopted ASC 842 usingperiod of time between the modified retrospective transition method. Resultstransfer of control of the goods and the time the customer pays for the reporting period beginning January 1, 2019 are presented under ASC 842, while prior period amounts weregoods is one year or less, we do not adjusted and continueconsider there to be reported in accordancea significant financing component associated with the contract.
We do not have contract assets or liabilities that are material.
Stock-based compensation
Equity instruments are measured at fair value on the grant date. Stock-based compensation expense is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards.
We use a Monte Carlo model to determine the fair value of certain share-based awards that contain market and performance-based conditions. The use of these models requires highly subjective assumptions, such as assumptions about the expected life of the award, vesting probability, expected dividend yield and the volatility of our historical accounting under ASC 840, Leases. Upon adoption of ASC 842, we increased our total assetsstock price.
Compensation expense for liability-classified share-based awards are recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period as a liability and liabilities dueremeasured, at fair value, at the balance sheet date.
See Note M. Stock-Based Compensation to the recording of operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities of approximately $30 million and $31 million, respectively, as of January 1, 2019. These increases did not have a material impact on our results of operations or cash flows.

Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
For all leases that commenced before the effective date of ASC 842, we elected to apply the permitted “practical expedients” to not reassess the following: (1) whether any expired or existing contracts contain leases; (2) the lease classification for any expired or existing leases; and (3) initial direct costs for any existing leases.

Leases
We determine if an arrangement is a lease atAt inception of a contract. ROU assets represent our right to use an underlyingcontract, we determine if the contract contains a lease. When a lease is identified, we recognize a leased asset for the(i.e., “Right-of-Use” or “ROU” assets) and a corresponding lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement dateliability based on the present value of the lease payments over the lease term. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit interest rate, we useterm, discounted using our incremental borrowing rate, based onunless an implicit rate is readily determinable. Lease payments include fixed and variable lease components derived from usage or market-based indices, such as the information available at commencement dateconsumer price index. Variable lease payments may fluctuate for a variety of reasons including usage, output, insurance or taxes. These variable amounts are expensed as incurred and not included in determining the present value of lease payments. Theassets or lease terms used to calculate the ROU asset and related lease liability include optionsliabilities. Options to extend or terminate a lease are reflected in the lease payments and lease term when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. Leasethose options. Leases are classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense forrecognition in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Majority of our leases are operating leases is recognizedfor which we recognize lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term as an operating expense.term. We have lease agreements which require paymentsapply the practical expedient to account for lease and non-leaseassociated nonlease components and have elected to account for these as a single lease componentcomponent.
Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Please see Note H. Leases to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
Pursuant to our risk management policies, we may choose to enter into derivative transactions to manage market risk volatility associated with changes in commodity pricing, currency exchange rates and interest rates. Derivatives used for this purpose are generally designated as net investment hedges, cash flow hedges or fair value hedges. Derivative instruments are recorded at fair value in the balance sheet. Gains and losses related to ourchanges in the fair value of derivative instruments not designated as hedges are recorded in Interest and other operating facilities.
Under ASC 840, if certain conditions were met certain lease assets were recorded as asset-under-construction during the construction phase (“build-to-suit accounting”). Under ASC 842, these assets are de-recognized; as such, upon adoption of ASC 842 we de-recognized 1 asset previously recorded under build-to-suit accounting and its associated liability of $29 million. A right-of-use asset will be capitalized upon subsequent commencement of the lease.
Please see Note C. Leases for additional information.

Asset retirement obligations
Orion estimates incremental costs for special handling, removal and disposal of materials that may or will give rise to conditional asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) and then discounts the expected costs back to the current year using a credit adjusted risk free rate. Orion recognizes ARO liabilities and costs when the timing and/or settlement can be reasonably estimated. The ARO reserves were $2.9 million and $2.4 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and are includedfinancial expense, net, inAccrued liabilities (current) and Other Liabilities (non-current) on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Statements of Operations.
64
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
45

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Cash flows from derivatives designated as hedges are reported in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows under the same category as the cash flows from the hedged items unless the derivative contract contains a significant financing element. Cash flows for derivatives with a significant financing element are classified as Cash flows from financing activities.

Cash Flow Hedges
—We enter into cash flow hedges to manage the variability in cash flows of a future transaction. Our cash flow hedges include cross currency swaps, and options and swaps to hedge interest rate and foreign exchange risk. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the gains and losses are recorded in Other comprehensive income (loss) and released to earnings in the same line item and in the same period during which the hedged item affects earnings.
We use regression analysis to assess initial hedge effectiveness. Following the inception of a hedging relationship, hedge effectiveness is assessed quarterly based on qualitative factors, if applicable, or regression analysis.
We have cross-currency swap contracts designated as cash flow hedges to reduce our exposure to the foreign currency exchange risk associated with certain intercompany loans and debt denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the issuer. Under the terms of these contracts, we make interest payments in euros and receive interest in U.S. dollars. Upon the maturities of these contracts, we will pay the principal amount of the loans in euros and receive U.S. dollars from our counterparties.
Net Investment Hedges—We enter into foreign currency derivatives and foreign currency denominated debt to reduce the volatility in shareholders’ equity resulting from changes in currency exchange rates of our foreign subsidiaries with respect to the U.S. dollar. Our foreign currency derivatives consist of cross-currency contracts and forward exchange contracts.
For derivatives designated as net investment hedges, gains or losses attributable to changes in spot foreign exchange rates over the designation period are reflected in foreign currency translation adjustments within Other comprehensive income (loss). Recognition in earnings is delayed until the net investment is sold or substantially liquidated. At that time, the amount recognized is reported in the same line item as the gain or loss on the liquidation of the hedged foreign operations. For our cross-currency swaps, the associated interest receipts and payments are recorded in Interest expense. For our foreign currency forward contracts, we amortize initial forward point values on a straight-line basis to Interest expense over the life of the hedging instrument. We monitor on a quarterly basis for any overhedged positions requiring de-designation and re-designation of the hedge to remove such over-hedged condition.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. An established hierarchy for inputs is used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability and are developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of Orion. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect our assumptions about the factors that market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability.
Fair value is estimated by applying the following hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:
Level 1—inputs are based on quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
Level 2—inputs are based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for similar or identical instruments in inactive markets and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets and liabilities.
Level 3—one or more significant inputs are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The fair values are therefore determined using model-based techniques that include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar valuation techniques.
We use the following inputs and valuation techniques to estimate the fair value of our financial instruments disclosed in Note K.Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurement to the Consolidated Financial Statements:
Cross-Currency Swaps—The fair value of our cross-currency swaps is calculated using the present value of future cash flows discounted using observable inputs such as known notional value amounts, yield curves, basis curves, as applicable, and with the foreign currency leg revalued using published spot and forward exchange rates on the valuation date.
Floating-for-Fixed Interest Rate Swaps—The fair value of our floating-for-fixed interest rate swaps is calculated using the present value of future cash flows using observable inputs such as benchmark interest rates and market yield curves.
Long-Term Debt—The fair value of our Term-Loan is calculated using pricing data obtained from well-established and recognized vendors of market data for debt valuations. The fair value of our term loan is determined based on a discounted cash flow model using observable inputs such as benchmark interest rates and public information regarding our credit risk.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg46

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The carrying amounts that we have reported for financial instruments, including Cash and cash equivalents, Restricted cash and cash equivalents, Accounts receivables, Accounts payable and Short-term debts, approximate their fair values due to the short maturity of those instruments.
Employee Benefits
Pension provisionsPlans:
Pension provisionsDefined Benefit Plans—Our defined benefit pension obligations are measured in accordance with the projected unit credit method (Topic ASC 715)method. The calculations and the resulting amounts recorded in our Consolidated Financial Statements are affected by assumptions including the discount rate, expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, the annual rate of change in compensation for plan-eligible employees, mortality tables, and other factors. We evaluate the assumptions used on an annual basis.
Past service cost and actual return on plan assets in excess of expected return are initially recorded in Other comprehensive income and subsequently recognized in earnings over the average remaining service period of the participants to the extent it exceeds the "corridor". The Company recognizescorridor is defined as the total actuarial gains or losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income exceeding 10%greater of 10 percent of the definedaccumulated projected benefit obligation inor the following year through profit and loss separately from its income from operations.fair value of the plan assets as of the beginning of the year.
Defined contribution obligations—Defined contribution obligations arise from commitments and state pension schemes (statutory pension insurance). The Company accountsWe account for itsour contributions to a defined contribution plan on an accrual basis. An asset or liability may result from advance payments or payments due, respectively, to a defined contribution fund.
Termination Benefits:
Stock-based compensation
Orion recognizes stock-based compensation cost measured atContractual termination benefits are payable when employment is terminated due to an event specified in the grant date based on the fair valueprovisions of the award, and recognizes these costs as expense over the service period, which generally represents the vesting period, includes an estimate of the awards that will be forfeited and also includes an estimate of awards that expect to vest based on the anticipated achievement of performance conditions. Fair value of awards is determined by using a Monte-Carlo simulation.
Awards can be classified as either equity-social/labor plan or liability-settled dependent on the Company's obligation to the counterparty and the intended settlement method. The overarching principle focuses on whether an equity relationship is created through the award. Orion classified its awards as equity settled.
When the terms of an equity-settled award are modified, the minimum expense recognized is the expense had the terms not been modified, if those original terms of the award are met. An additional expensestatutory law. A liability is recognized for any modificationone-time termination benefits when we are committed to (i) make payments and the number of affected employees and the benefits received are known to both parties, and (ii) terminating the employment of current employees according to a detailed formal plan without possibility of withdrawal and can reasonably estimate such amount. Benefits falling due more than 12 months after the balance sheet date are discounted to present value.
Classification
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation, because we believe they no longer meet the criteria for separate disclosure. Previously reported financial statements have been adjusted to reflect the following changes:
On the Consolidated Balance Sheets, we previously reported Other current financial assets, Other financial assets, and Current portion of employee benefit plan obligation on the face of this financial statement. During the fourth quarter of 2021, we concluded that increasesclassification of these line items are better reflected in Prepaid expenses and other current assets, Other assets and Other current liabilities, respectively.
On the total fair valueConsolidated Statement of the share-based compensation transaction, or is otherwise beneficial to the employee as measured at the dateComprehensive Income, we previously reported Unrealized net gains (losses) on hedges of modification. Any modifications are accounted for as a new award, which might resultnet investment in a lower amountforeign operation and Unrealized net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges separately on the face of compensation cost thanthis financial statement. During the grant date fair valuefourth quarter of the original award or a greater amount of compensation costs than the sum of the grant date fair value of the original award plus the incremental fair value.
Environmental provisions
Environmental provisions are distinct obligations that arise from the improper operation of an asset and obligations from the normal operation of an asset (asset retirement). Environmental obligations are recognized when there is a legal obligation to restore a site, the damage has already occurred, it is likely that restorations will be incurred and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Changes in environmental legislation are not taken into account until they are enacted. When a single liability amount cannot be reasonably estimated, but a range can be reasonably estimated, the amount that reflects the best estimate is accrued within that range or as for other provisions the low end of the range if no estimate within the range is better. Environmental provisions are usually recognized immediately in profit or loss.
Restructuring expenses
A restructuring is a program that is planned and controlled by management and materially changes either the scope of a business or the manner in which the business is conducted.
Orion accounts for a provision for restructuring costs when there is a formal plan and the details of the restructuring have been communicated to those affected by the plan. Costs are allocated to the following cost types; termination benefits, costs to terminate a contract and costs to close or consolidate facilities or to relocate employees. The different cost types contain separate recognition criteria.
A provision for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity shall be measured initially and recorded at its fair value2021, we combined them in the periodline item Net gains (losses) on derivatives.
On the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Statement, in whichCash flows from financing activities, we previously reported Payments of debt issue costs and Taxes paid for shares issued under net settlement feature separately on the liability is incurred.face of this financial statement. During the fourth quarter of 2021, we combined them in the line item Other financing activities.
65



Note B. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
Equity Method InvestmentsIn January 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-01, Investments - Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)815). The amendments in this update clarify the interaction of the accounting for equity securities under Topic 321 and investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting in Topic 323 and the accounting for certain forward contracts and purchased options accounted for under Topic 815. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2021. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact the adoption of this standard will have on its financial statements.did not materially impact our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848)In December 2019, theMarch 2020, FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12,2020-04, Income TaxesReference Rate Reform (Topic 740)848): SimplifyingFacilitation of the Accounting for Income TaxesEffects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting (ASU 2019-12)2020-04), a new standard. In January 2021, FASB issued ASU 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope, which is intendedrefines the scope of ASC 848 and clarifies some of its guidance as part of the Board’s monitoring of global reference rate reform. This guidance permits entities to simplify various aspectselect certain optional expedients and exceptions when accounting for contract modifications for receivables, debt, and leases related to accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 removesreference rate reform as well as derivative contracts and certain exceptionshedging relationships affected by reference rate reform activities under way in global financial markets.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg47

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the general principles in Topic 740 and also clarifies and amends existing guidance to improve consistent application. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company is currently evaluating the impact ofadopted this standard on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-11, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (ASU 2019-11).guidance prospectively from July 1, 2021. The amendments in this update represents changes to clarify, correct errors in, or improve the codification, and make the codification easier to understand and easier to apply by eliminating inconsistencies and providing clarifications. For entities that have adopted ASU 2016-13, the amendments in ASU 2019-11 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period after the issuance of ASU No. 2019-11 as long as the entity has adopted the amendments in ASU No. 2016-13. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact the adoption of this standard will have on its financial statements.did not impact our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-05, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326). The amendments in this ASU provide entities that have certain instruments within the scope of Subtopic 326-20, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses - Measured at Amortized Cost, with an option to irrevocably elect the fair value option in Subtopic 825-10, Financial Instruments - Overall, applied on an instrument-by-instrument basis for eligible instruments, upon adoption of Topic 326. For entities that have adopted the amendments in ASU No. 2016-13, the amendments in ASU No. 2019-05 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period after the issuance of ASU No. 2019-05 as long as the entity has adopted the amendments in ASU No. 2016-13. The adoption of this ASU will enable us to update our assessments of effectiveness, probability, and hedged risk in order to continue hedge accounting for the designated hedges that reference LIBOR, which is expected to be discontinued as a result of reference rate reform. The Company will continue to evaluate the guidance to determine the timing and extent to which we will not have a significant impact onapply other accounting relief provided by the Company's financial statements.guidance.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In April 2019,Government Assistance—On November 17, 2021, the FASB issued ASUAccounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2019-04,2021-10, Codification ImprovementsDisclosures by Business Entities About Government Assistance, which requires business entities to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivativesprovide certain disclosures when they have received government assistance and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instrumentsuse a grant or contribution accounting model by analogy to other accounting guidance (e.g., a grant model under IAS 20, . The updates contained in this ASU provide clarification and correction to ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, and ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging ActivitiesGovernment Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, and is intended to improve the Codification or correct its unintended application. The amendments in ASU No. 2019-04 related to ASU No. 2016-01 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period following the issuance of ASU No. 2019-04 as long as the entity has adopted all of the amendments in ASU No. 2016-01. For entities that have adopted the amendments in update 2016-13, the amendments in ASU No. 2019-04 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period after issuance of ASU No. 2019-04 as long as the entity has adopted the amendments in ASU No. 2016-13. For entities that have adopted the amendments in ASU No. 2017-12 as of the issuance date of ASU No. 2019-04, the effective date is as of the beginning of the first annual period beginning after the issuance of ASU No. 2019-04 (January 1, 2020 for Orion). For those entities, early adoption is permitted, including adoption on any date on or after the issuance of ASU No. 2019-04. The adoption of this guidance will not have a significant impact on the Company's financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No 2018-14,; Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit PlansAssistance; ASC 958-605, Not-for-Profit Entities—Revenue Recognition). The guidance changes the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension and/or other postretirement benefit plans. It eliminates requirements for certain disclosures that are no longer considered cost beneficial and requires new ones that the FASB considers pertinent. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years endingannual periods beginning after December 15, 2020 for public business entities2021. Entities may apply the ASU’s provisions either (1) prospectively to all transactions within the scope of ASC 832 that are reflected in the financial statements as of the adoption date and fiscal years endingall new transactions entered into after December 15, 2021 for all other entities. the date of adoption or (2) retrospectively.
Early adoption is permitted. Entities will apply the amendments retrospectively. The adoption of this guidance willASU is not expected to have a significantmaterial impact on the Company'sour future consolidated financial statements.statements and related disclosures.

66



Note C. Accounts Receivable
The company accounts receivable are as follows:
December 31
20212020
(In millions)
Accounts receivable$291.5 $240.6 
Expected credit losses(2.6)(5.8)
Accounts receivable, net of expected credit losses$288.9 $234.8 
The company allowance for credit losses are as follows:
20212020
(In millions)
Allowance for credit losses as of January 1,$(5.8)$(6.6)
Credit loss expense(0.6)(4.0)
Credit loss income and utilization3.6 4.9 
Foreign currency translation effects0.2 (0.1)
Allowance for credit losses as of December 31,$(2.6)$(5.8)
Note D. Inventories
Inventories, net of reserves, are as follows:
December 31
20212020
(In millions)
Raw materials, consumables and supplies, net$97.1 $57.0 
Work in process0.2 0.3 
Finished goods, net132.5 84.2 
Total$229.8 $141.5 
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, inventory reserves were approximately $15.9 million and $12.7 million, respectively.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg48

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Note E. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
December 31
20212020
(In millions)
VAT$23.4 $23.0 
Deposits17.5 2.3 
Restricted Cash2.8 3.0 
Miscellaneous other receivables24.8 19.8 
Total$68.5 $48.1 
Note F. Property, Plant and Equipment, and right-of-use assets
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following:
December 31,
20212020
(In millions)
Land$32.6 $35.0 
Land rights and buildings104.1 101.9 
Plant and machinery1,029.9 833.2 
Other equipment, furniture and fixtures38.4 37.6 
Prepayments and construction in progress115.2 176.3 
Total property, plant and equipment1,320.2 1,184.0 
Less: accumulated depreciation612.3 573.5 
Net property, plant and equipment$707.9 $610.5 
Depreciation expense was $86.5 million, $81.0 million and $75.3 million for fiscal years ending December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Note G. Leases
Orion has entered into lease contracts as a lessee and is not acting as a lessor. On January 1, 2019, Orion adopted Topic 842 (Leases). Orion adopted ASUs 2016-02, 2018-11, 2018-10 and 2019-01 (“Lease ASUs”) using the optional transition method under ASU 2018-11 that allows for a cumulative-effect adjustment in the period of adoption without restating prior periods. Orion elected the optional practical expedient upon transition to retain the lease classification and initial direct costs for any leases that existed prior to adoption of the standard. We have not recorded an adjustment to retained earnings due to materiality. In addition, the adoption did not materially impact our consolidated net income and had no impact on our cash flows.
Orion’sThe vast majority of Orion’s lease contracts are concerning operational itemsfor operating lease assets such as rail cars, company cars, offices and office equipment. Lease costs for the years ended December 31, are as follows:
202120202019
(In millions)
Finance lease costs$6.4 $2.3 $0.6 
Operating lease costs7.68.58.6
Short-term leasing costs3.83.13.9
Total$17.8 $13.9 $13.1 
oec-20211231_g1.jpg49

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The recordedcompany’s right-of-use assets as of December 31, 2019 amounted to $27.5 million,(“ROU”) and the corresponding lease liabilities amountedrelated to $29.1 million, of which $7.6 million were recorded within other currentoperating and finance leases reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows:
December 31,
20212020
(In millions)
ROU Assets
Operating leases$20.0 $25.3 
Finance leases64.6 60.3 
Total$84.6 $85.6 
Lease Liabilities(1)
Operating leases
Current$7.9 $7.2 
Long-term12.0 19.0 
19.9 26.2 
Finance leases
Current3.7 4.9 
Long-term61.0 55.5 
64.7 60.4 
Total$84.6 $86.6 
(1) Reflected in Current and Other liabilities and $21.5 million as other liabilities. in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The weighted remaining average minimum lease period is 2.6 years.for finance leases and operating leases are 20.6 years and 3.9 years, respectively.
The undiscounted minimum lease payments are due inMaturities of operating and reconcile to the discountedfinance lease liabilities are as follows:


December 31,
2019
(In thousands)
Next 12 months$7,598 
1 to 2 years6,359 
2 to 3 years5,638 
3 to 4 years5,039 
4 to 5 years4,339 
More than 5 years5,622 
Total undiscounted minimum lease payments$34,595 
Discount(5,533)
Lease liability (current and non-current)$29,061 

Finance LeasesOperating LeasesTotal
(In millions)
Next 12 months$6.3 $8.6 $14.9 
1 to 2 years5.1 5.4 10.5 
2 to 3 years4.9 3.7 8.6 
3 to 4 years4.8 2.9 7.7 
4 to 5 years4.4 1.0 5.4 
More than 5 years74.0 0.1 74.1 
Total undiscounted minimum lease payments99.5 21.7 121.2 
Imputed interest(34.8)(1.8)(36.6)
Lease liability (current and non-current)$64.7 $19.9 $84.6 
The weighted average discount rate applied to the lease liabilities is 6.93%4.44%.
Finance lease costs were immaterial
oec-20211231_g1.jpg50

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Note H. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The carrying amount of goodwill attributable to each reportable segment for the yearyears ended December 31, is as follows:
GoodwillRubberSpecialtyTotal
(In millions)
Balance as of January 1, 2020$31.0 $46.4 $77.4 
Foreign currency impact2.8 4.3 7.1 
Balance as of December 31, 202033.8 50.7 84.5 
Foreign currency impact(2.6)(3.9)(6.5)
Balance as of December 31, 2021$31.2 $46.8 $78.0 
Intangible Assets
The following table provides information regarding Orion's intangible assets:
December 31,
20212020
CostAccumulated AmortizationNetCostAccumulated AmortizationNet
(In millions)
Developed technology and patents$71.5 $51.8 $19.7 $69.4 $46.2 $23.2 
Customer relationships76.9 73.6 3.3 83.1 76.0 7.1 
Trademarks19.5 13.4 6.1 21.1 13.1 8.0 
Long-term contracts7.9 1.9 6.0 8.2 1.3 6.9 
Other intangible assets42.8 41.6 1.2 53.8 52.2 1.6 
Total intangible assets$218.6 $182.3 $36.3 $235.6 $188.8 $46.8 
Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 with segregated depreciation expenses of the right-of-use assets in the amount of $0.5was $7.8 million, $8.2 million and interest on lease liabilities of $0.1 million. Operating lease costs amounted$12.9 million, respectively, and is included in total to $12.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 and were recorded as operating expenses under costCost of sales selling,and Selling, general and administrative expenses and under research and development cost. Cash paid for amounts included in the measurementConsolidated Statements of lease liabilities from operating leases was $8.6 millionOperations.
The estimated aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets for the year endedfiscal years ending December 31, 2019 and was immaterial for finance leases during the same period.
In addition to the above, we entered into a forward-starting lease agreement in October 2016, for a district heating facility in Cologne, Germany, where we plan to operate the equipment to generate the required heat energy. The lessor, the public utility of our neighbor city and its agents, are currently constructing the facilities at our location, with the lease scheduled to commence by the end of 2020 after construction is completed. The lease agreement will have a total of approximately $35.0 million in undiscounted future lease payments over the 20 year term of the lease.



Note D. Inventories
Inventories, net of obsolete, unmarketable and slow moving reserves is as follows:
December 31
20192018
(In thousands)
Raw materials, consumables and supplies, net$69,168  $73,460  
Work in process148  1,246  
Finished goods, net95,483  108,923  
Total$164,799  $183,629  
Orion periodically reviews inventories for both obsolescence and loss in value. In this review, Orion makes assumptions about the future demand for and the future market value of the inventory and, based on these assumptions, estimates the amount of obsolete, unmarketable or slow moving inventory. The inventory reserve for obsolete, unmarketable and slow moving assets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 amounted to $6.7 million and $1.6 million, respectively.
In the periods ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 $6.0 million, $1.9 million and $2.7 million, respectively, were recognized as an expense for damaged and lost inventories.
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, reserves to adjust inventories net realizable value in the amount of $1.4 million and $2.4 million, respectively, were recognized on raw materials, consumables and supplies and on finished goods.
68



Note E. Property, Plant and Equipment, and right-of-use assets
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following:
December 31,
20192018
(In thousands)
Land$33,654  $26,108  
Land rights and buildings94,157  92,495  
Plant and machinery725,203  673,919  
Other equipment, furniture and fixtures30,965  28,460  
Prepayments and construction in progress138,374  98,096  
Total property, plant and equipment1,022,354  919,078  
Less: accumulated depreciation488,300  435,544  
Net property, plant and equipment$534,054  $483,534  
Depreciation expense was $75.3 million, $78.2 million and $77.0 million for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Property, plant and equipment figures include remeasurements due to the finalization of purchase price accounting in the third quarter of 2019 for the acquisition of SN2A (see Note H. Business Combination, Goodwill and Intangible Assets).
Right-of-use assets' cost price amounts to $36.1 million as at December 31, 2019. With accumulated depreciation of $8.5 million, the net carrying amount is $27.5 million at December 31, 2019. Depreciation expense for fiscal year 2019 equals accumulated depreciation, since right-of-use assets were first recognized in 2019.
Year(In millions)
2022$6.8 
20236.5 
20246.4 
20256.3 
20265.0 
Thereafter5.3 
Total aggregated amortization$36.3 

Note F. Prepaid and other assets
December 31
20192018
TotalThereof currentThereof non‑currentTotalThereof currentThereof non‑current
(In thousands)
Miscellaneous other receivables$36,531  $36,189  $342  $34,052  $33,750  $302  
Prepaid expenses4,529  1,170  3,359  3,814  1,188  2,626  
Total$41,059  $37,358  $3,701  $37,866  $34,938  $2,928  
Miscellaneous other receivables in the financial year are mainly related to VAT ($21.5 million and $15.7 million as at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively), advance payments ($1.2 million and $5.3 million as at December 31, 2019, 2018, respectively), down payments ($3.1 million and $4.3 million as at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively), refundable environmental taxes prepaid ($3.2 million and $5.9 million as at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively) and guarantee deposits ($1.4 million and $1.7 million as at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively).
Prepaid expenses mainly include other unamortized transaction costs of $3.4 million and $2.4 million as at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, (of which $2.8 million and $1.8 million, respectively, is non-current) incurred in connection with the revolving credit facility that has not been drawn by the respective reporting dates.
69
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
51


Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Note G.I. Accruals and Other Liabilities
The components of Current accrued liabilities were as follows at December 31:
20212020
(In millions)
Accrued employee compensation$26.1 $21.6 
Accrued liabilities for sales and procurement5.6 7.0 
Accrued liabilities for restructuring9.3 8.0 
Environmental reserves3.4 0.4 
Other accrued liabilities6.5 12.2 
Total$50.9 $49.2 
The components of Other current liabilities were as follows at December 31:
20212020
(In millions)
Employee related liabilities$5.6 $6.6 
Current lease liabilities (refer to Note G. Leases )
11.6 12.1 
Other current liabilities16.9 19.1 
Total$34.1 $37.8 
The components of Other long-term liabilities were as follows at December 31:
20212020
(In millions)
Employee related liabilities$4.9 $5.9 
Liabilities for asset retirement obligation4.1 1.7 
Environmental reserve4.4 1.2 
Long-term lease liabilities (refer to Note G. Leases )
73.0 74.5 
Other non-current liabilities8.8 22.9 
Total$95.2 $106.2 
Note J. Debt and Other Obligations
The company had the following debt arrangements in place as ofat December 31 2019 and 2018:
December 31
20192018
(In thousands)
Current
Term loan$8,057  $8,149  
Deferred debt issuance costs - term loan(1)
$(1,409) (1,472) 
Other short-term debt and obligations29,762  34,343  
Current portion of long term debt and other financial liabilities36,410  41,020  
Non-current
Term loan634,994  650,014  
Deferred debt issuance costs - term loan(1)
(4,733) (6,266) 
Other long-term debt and obligations—  —  
Long-term debt, net630,261  643,748  
Total$666,671  $684,768  

(1) According to ASU 2015-03, adopted on January 1, 2016, the Company presents debt issuance costs related to a recognized liabilityare as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that liability.follows:
20212020
(In millions)
Current
Term loan$3.0 $8.5 
Deferred debt issuance costs-term loan(0.8)(1.5)
Other short-term debt and obligations149.5 75.6 
Current portion of long-term debt and other financial liabilities151.7 82.6 
Non-current
Term loan636.0 659.5 
Deferred debt issuance costs-term loan(4.8)(3.7)
Long-term debt, net631.2 655.8 
Total$782.9 $738.4 
(a) Term Loan
On July 25,In 2014, Orion entered into a refinancing of its indebtedness. The initialCredit Agreement, which included an $895.0 million term loan, credit facility in USD of $895.0 millionwhich was allocated to a term loan facility denominated in USDU.S. Dollars of $358.0 million and a term loan facility denominated in EuroEuros of €399.0M€399.0 million with both having an original maturity date of July 25, 2021 (the “Term“Prior Term Loans”). Initial interest was calculated based on three-month EURIBOR (for the Euro denominatedEuro-denominated loan), orand three-month USD-LIBOR (for the USD denominatedUSD-denominated loan) plus a 3.75% - 4.00% margin depending on the Company’s net leverage ratio. For both EURIBOR and USD-LIBOR a floor of 1.0% applied. At least 1% of the principal amount is required to be repaid per annum; annum.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg52

Orion may make additional voluntary repayments. In the years 2015 to 2017 Orion executed several voluntary repayments totaling €56.0 million and $58.0 million.Engineered Carbons S.A
After several amendmentsNotes to the credit agreementConsolidated Financial Statements
Subsequent to 2014, Orion repriced its EUR- and USD-denominated outstanding term loans during the years 2016 to 2018 and achievedentered into a number of amendments, achieving a significant reduction of both interest margins to currently 2.00% for the USDU.S. dollar term loan and 2.25% for the Euro term loan. Theloan at that time. In addition, the interest margin iswas no longer linked to Orion's net leverage ratio. In additionratio and the EURIBOR and USD-LIBOR floors were reduced to 0.00%. Moreovereliminated. In 2017, the duration of the Prior Term Loans was extended to July 25, 2024.
In September 2021, Orion entered into the Ninth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, which includes an amended and restated term loan agreement (the "Term Loans"). The Term Loan facility was allocated to a term loan facility denominated in U.S. dollars of $300 million and denominated in Euros of €300 million with both term loans were extended by another 3 years resulting inhaving a new maturity date of July 25, 2024 (previously July 25, 2021)September 24, 2028, replacing the Prior Term Loans. Interest is calculated based on three months EURIBOR (for the Euro-denominated loan) plus a margin of 2.50%, or three-month USD-LIBOR (for the USD-denominated loan) plus a margin of 2.25%. Other provisionsFor the U.S. dollar loan, a floor of this credit agreement remained unchanged.0.50% applies and for the Euro-denominated loan no floor exists. 1% of the principal amount is required to be repaid per annum in respect to the USD-denominated loans, whereas there is no scheduled amortization for the Euro-denominated loans. The Credit Agreement was also amended to include LIBOR replacement language in preparation for the eventual phase out of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR).
Transaction costs incurred directly in connection with the incurrence ofThe Term Loans include a sustainability-linked margin adjustment that applies to both the Euro and U.S. Dollar denominated term loans, thereby reducing their carrying amount, are amortized as finance costs overdollar loans. The margin adjustment is based on annual SOx and NOx emission reduction targets for the termCompany’s North American plants between 2022 and 2028, respectively. Specifically, the credit spread on the Term Loans will decline or rise by up to 10 basis points depending on the emissions profile of the loans. Transaction costs incurredCompany’s North American plants, in connection withaggregate. Starting in 2022 and continuing through 2025, the modificationsCompany will review annually whether both interim targets have been met. If the Company achieves both targets, it will benefit from up to a 10-basis point credit spread reduction for the prospective 12 month period following the submission of the term loan inannual ESG compliance certificate. For the years 2016period from 2026 to 2018 were directly expensed as incurred as2028, a margin step-up by 5 or 10 basis points would occur if Orion does not maintain the modified terms were notreduced emissions profile of one or both targets.
Other provisions of the Credit Agreement relating to the Term Loan remained substantially different. unchanged.
In connection with the repricing described above further transaction costs of $0.7 million in 2018 and $3.5 million equivalent in 2017 and $2.1 million equivalent in 2016 were incurred and directly expensed. In 2019, an amount of $1.4 million equivalent related to capitalized transaction costs was amortized and recognized as finance costs in this regard (prior year: $1.4 million equivalent).
On May 11, 2018, Orion entered into a $235.0 million cross currency swap to virtually convert its US dollar liabilities into EUR as part of a new hedging approach. This swap transaction impacts both principal and interest payments associated with debt service and results in a further annual interest payments savings of approximately $4.7 million. The swap became effective on May 15, 2018 and will expire on July 25, 2024, in line with maturity of the term loan.
A portion of the USD-denominated term loan was designated as a hedge of the net investment in a foreign operation to reduce the Company's foreign currency exposure. Since January 1, 2015 the Company had designated $180.0 million of the total USD-denominated term loan held by a Germany based subsidiary as the hedging instrument to hedge the change in net assets of a US subsidiary, which is held by a Germany based subsidiary, to manage foreign currency risk. Due to the new hedging approach and the new cross currency swap as described above, hedge accounting for the net investment hedge was discontinued on May 15, 2018. An unrealized loss of $2.2 million remains within other comprehensive income until it is recycled through profit and loss upon divestment of the hedged item.
The carrying value as at December 31, 2019 includes the nominal amountSeptember 2021 modification of the Term Loans plus accrued unpaid interest less deferred debt issuanceLoan, Orion incurred approximately $7.8 million of refinancing costs - termof which $2.8 million of loan origination costs were capitalized and $5.0 million of $6.1 million (December 31, 2018: $7.7 million).

70



other fees were directly expensed.
(b) Revolving credit facility
To generally safeguardIn addition, in 2014, under the Company’s liquidity, the Company hasCredit Agreement, we entered into a revolving credit facility (“RCF”).
As part of July 25, 2014 refinancing the then-existing revolving facility was replaced by a €115.0 million multicurrency revolving credit facility (“RCF”) with an original maturity date of July 25, 2019. Interest is calculated based on EURIBOR (for EUReuro drawings), and USD-LIBOR (for USDU.S. Dollar drawings) plus a 2.5% - 3.0% margin (depending on leverage ratio). The RCF has not been drawn on the respective reporting dates while certain local ancillary facilities reduced the available commitment. Transaction costs in the amount of $3.3 million originally incurred in connection with the RCF are alsowere recorded as deferred expenses and are amortized as finance costs on a straight-line basis over the term of the facility (until July 25, 2019).
The amendmentSubsequent to the Credit Agreement2014, Orion entered into on May 5, 2017 (i) reduceda number of amendments, which largely were made to increase the commitment fee paid on the unused commitments from 40% of the Applicable Rate (as definedRCF capacity. The latest RCF amendment completed in the Credit Agreement) to 35% of the Applicable Rate, (ii)April 2019, extended the RCF maturity date for the revolving credit facility to April 25, 2021 and (iii) increased the aggregate amount of revolving credit commitments to €175.0 million. All other terms of the Credit Agreement remained unchanged.
Additional Transaction costs in conjunction with the RCF in the amount of $2.3 million incurred in connection with the Amendment to the Credit Agreement are also recorded as deferred expenses and are amortized as finance costs on a straight-line basis over the term of the facility (until April 25, 2021).
On April 2, 2019, the Company entered into the eighth amendment (the “Eighth Amendment”) to the Credit Agreement, among the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, as Borrowers or Guarantors, the Lenders from time to time party thereto and Goldman Sachs Bank US, as administrative agent for the Lenders. The Amendment relates to the revolving credit facility (“RCF”) provided by the Credit Agreement. The Eighth Amendment became effective on April 10, 2019.
The Eighth Amendment:
(i) extended the maturity date for the RCF by three years to April 25, 2024,
(ii) increased the aggregate amount of revolving credit commitments in Euro by €75.0 million to the now EUR €250.0 million, and reduced the interest margin to a 1.7% to 2.7% range, using a revised pricing grid.
(iii) reduced revolving credit interest expense by wayAs of a new pricing grid that entitles an initial margin of 0.019 whenDecember 31, 2021, the Company's leverage ratio is between 2.25x and 1.75x (formerly 2.5% whenCompany’s net leverage ratio was < 2.30x);2.7x, which corresponds to an interest margin of 2.40 for both USD and Euro denominated borrowings.
All other terms of the Credit Agreement remainRCF remained substantially unchanged, including the commitment fee, which remains at 35% of applicable margin.the interest margin or 0.8% at December 31, 2021. As of and for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, no RCF borrowings, as defined in the RCF agreement, had been drawn. Letters of credit can be issued for the amount available under the RCF and ancillary facilities. The weighted average interest rates on the RCF as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 were 2.36% and 2.48%, respectively.
All other terms ofFor the Credit Agreement remain substantially unchanged.
Duringyears ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, amortized transaction costs of $0.7 million were amortized (prior year: $0.8 million). immaterial.
Unamortized transaction costs thatincluded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 amounted to $2.2 million and $3.0 million, were incurred in conjunction with thevarious RCF in July 2014, the Amendment on May 30, 2017 and the Amendment on April 2, 2019, amount to $3.4 million as at December 31, 2019. Unamortized transaction costs as at December 31, 2018 amount to $2.4 million and were incurred in conjunction with the RCF in July 2014 and the Amendment on May 30, 2017.amendments.
(c) Local bank loans and other short term borrowings
Orion has established additional localAs part of the RCF, the Company can also establish ancillary credit facilities by converting the commitments of select lenders under the €250.0 million RCF into bilateral credit agreements. Original borrowings under ancillary credit facilities reduce availability under the RCF. Borrowings under ancillary credit facilities do not count toward debt drawn under the RCF for OEC GmbH and OEC LLC by using overallthe purposes of determining whether the financial covenant under the Credit Agreement related to the RCF commitments. must be tested.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg53

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2019,2021and 2020, the OEC GmbH facilityCompany had $26.4the following ancillary facilities and uncommitted lines of credit outstanding:
20212020
(In millions)
Ancillary credit facilities
Total capacity (€170 million)$192.5 $208.6 
OEC GmbH outstanding borrowings$103.0 $43.5 
OEC LLC outstanding borrowings13.4 26.7 
Uncommitted local lines of credit:
Korea (capacity $40.0 million)30.8 4.6 
Brazil (capacity $2.3 million)2.3 0.8 
Total of Other short-term debt and obligations$149.5 $75.6 
The general terms of the ancillary credit facilities are linked to the terms in the RCF. The local credit lines in Brazil and Korea are with local banks that are not lenders under the Credit Agreement and were negotiated bilaterally.
During the second quarter 2020, the Company increased the number of RCF banks and total converted ancillary borrowings from €130 million (prior year: $28.6 million) outstanding andto €170 million, resulting in capacity under the OEC LLC facility had $2.2RCF at any net leverage level, as even a full RCF utilization won’t trigger the 35% covenant threshold (see Covenant Compliance section below - First Lien Leverage Ratio covenant). Using exchange rates applicable as of December 31, 2021, the €250 million (prior year: 0) outstanding.

RCF capacity amounted to approximately $283 million with availability after ancillary borrowings of $166.7 million.
71



Future Years Payment Schedule
The following table showsaggregate principal amounts of long-term debt, excluding finance lease liabilities presented in Note G. Leases, are as follows:
Repayment
(In millions)
2022$3.0 
20233.0 
20243.0 
20253.0 
20263.0 
20273.0 
2028621.0 
Total$639.0 
Covenant Compliance
The Credit Agreement contains certain non-financial covenants that, among other things, limit the residual terms of our Term Loan and its impact on our cash flows based on the agreed maturity date, the repayment schedule,Company’s ability and the total interest amounts. Implied threeability of certain of its subsidiaries to (i) incur additional debt, (ii) pay dividends, repurchase shares or make certain other restricted payments or investments, (iii) incur liens, (iv) sell assets, (v) to pay dividends or to make other payments to the Company, (vi) enter into affiliate transactions, (vii) engage in sale and leaseback transactions, and (viii) consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets. These covenants are subject to significant exceptions and qualifications.
In addition, there is one financial covenant under the Credit Agreement, the First Lien Leverage Ratio (“FLLR”), defined as Consolidated First Lien Debt divided by Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA for the trailing twelve months EUR forward interest rates(“TTM”). The FLLR is not permitted to exceed 5.5x TTM EBITDA and implied USD forward interest ratesis tested each quarter RCF utilization exceeds 35%, as applicable ondefined in the Credit Agreement (the “Covenant Trigger”). Notably, not all debt counts toward RCF utilization for purposes of calculating the Covenant Trigger, namely, term debt, debt drawn under ancillary credit facility lines and debt drawn under any uncommitted local credit lines are excluded. FLLR, Consolidated First Lien Debt and Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA have the meanings given to them in the Credit Agreement.
As of December 31, 2019 were used2021, we are in compliance with our debt covenants.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg54

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to calculate the repayment amounts.Consolidated Financial Statements
InterestScheduled RepaymentTotal
(In millions) 
2020$18.8  $8.1  $26.9  
202117.8  8.1  25.8  
202217.6  8.1  25.6  
202317.5  8.1  25.6  
20249.9  610.8  620.7  
Total  $81.6  $643.1  $724.7  

Note H. Business Combination, Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Business Combination
On October 31, 2018, the acquisition for 100% of shares of the acetylene carbon black manufacturer Société du Noir d'Acétylène de l'Aubette, SAS (“SN2A”) from LyondellBasell Industries Holdings B.V. was completed. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. The acquisition had an aggregate purchase price of $36.8 million.
This acquisition is expected to strengthen the Company's position in the specialty carbon black market by adding acetylene carbon black to its product portfolio. In finalizing the purchase price accounting during the third quarter of 2019, the previously disclosed purchase price allocation as of the closing date was updated to reflect adjustments existing at the acquisition date and identified during the measurement period under ASC 805 - Business Combinations.
The following table summarizes the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of acquisition:
(in thousands)
Assets
Cash$213 
Other current assets176 
Accounts receivables1,578 
Inventories924 
Property, plant and equipment5,317 
Intangible assets12,766 
Total assets acquired$20,974 
Liabilities
Current liabilities$2,488 
Deferred tax liabilities4,716 
Total liabilities assumed$7,204 
Net assets acquired$13,770 
Consideration:
Cash consideration paid$36,784 
Goodwill$23,014 
The acquisition was accounted for using the acquisition method. Tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at fair value as of the acquisition date.
72



During the quarter ended September 30, 2019, we completed the purchase accounting for the acquisition of SN2A and we reduced the total fair value of intangible assets acquired from $44.3 million to $12.8 million based on an improved understanding of the allocation of future expected cash flows since the date of acquisition including an adjustment to the applied discount rate aligned to target specific considerations. In addition, we reduced the fair value of acquired property, plant and equipment from $5.8 million to $5.3 million due to third party appraisals and we reduced the related deferred tax liabilities from $13.7 million by $9.0 million to $4.7 million accordingly to reflect the impact of changes in fair values of the tangible and intangible assets. These changes resulted in $23.0 million of goodwill being recorded and allocated to our Specialty Carbon Black Segment. We also recorded a reduction in depreciation and amortization expense of $1.0 million and an increase in net income of $0.7 million respectively, in the third quarter of fiscal 2019 related to prior periods as a result of the changes in fair values of tangible and intangible assets and the associated deferred tax liabilities.
The fair values of identifiable assets and liabilities acquired were developed with the assistance of a third-party valuation firm. The fair value of acquired property, plant and equipment is valued at its "value-in-use" as there are no known plans to dispose of any assets. The fair value of acquired identifiable intangible assets was determined using the "income approach" on an individual asset basis. The key assumptions used in the calculation of the discounted cash flows include projected revenues, gross margin, operating expenses, and discount rate. The valuations and the underlying assumptions have been deemed reasonable by the Company’s management. There are inherent uncertainties and management judgment required in these determinations.
Goodwill
Orion had goodwill balances of $77.3 million and $55.5 million at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The carrying amount of goodwill attributable to each reportable segment for period ended December 31, 2019 is as follows:
GoodwillRubberSpecialtyTotal
(In thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2018$33,037  $25,143  $58,180  
Foreign currency impact(1,487) (1,147) (2,634) 
Balance at December 31, 2018$31,550  $23,996  $55,546  
Addition Goodwill recorded in SN2A acquisition—  23,014  23,014  
Foreign currency impact(595) (624) (1,220) 
Balance at December 31, 2019$30,955  $46,385  $77,341  
Qualitative impairment testing performed during the fiscal year for the Rubber and Specialty reporting units did 0t indicate a goodwill impairment.
Intangible Assets
The following table provides information regarding Orion's intangible assets:
December 31,
20192018
Gross Carrying ValueAccumulated AmortizationNet Intangible AssetsGross Carrying ValueAccumulated AmortizationNet Intangible Assets
(In thousands)
Developed technology and patents$62,870  $37,402  $25,468  $82,007  $34,348  $47,660  
Customer relationships76,531  69,514  7,017  78,263  66,262  12,001  
Trademarks19,322  10,764  8,558  19,694  9,782  9,912  
Long-term contracts7,430  630  6,800  22,396  113  22,283  
Other intangible assets52,708  49,955  2,753  50,621  47,232  3,389  
Total intangible assets$218,862  $168,266  $50,596  $252,982  $157,737  $95,245  
Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which range from 3 to 15 years. The weighted average amortization period for all intangible assets at December 31, 2019 and 2018 was 8.4 years and 10.8 years, respectively. Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $12.9 million, $20.0 million and $21.4 million, respectively, and is included in Cost of sales and Selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Intangible assets include remeasurements due to the purchase price adjustment in the third quarter of 2019 of SN2A acquisition (see Note H.Business Combination, Goodwill and Intangible Assets).


73



The estimated aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2020 to 2024 and thereafter are as follows:
Year(In thousands)
2020$8,161  
20217,041  
20226,588  
20236,252  
20246,204  
Thereafter16,351  
Total aggregated amortization$50,596  

Note I. Accruals and Other Liabilities
Current accrued liabilities consist of the following:
December 31
20192018
(In thousands)
Accrued employee compensation$24,746  $28,693  
Accrued liabilities for sales and procurement3,274  3,580  
Accrued liabilities for restructuring4,765  8,658  
Other accrued liabilities12,145  15,366  
Total$44,931  $56,297  
Other current liabilities consist of the following:
December 31
20192018
(In thousands)
Employee related liabilities$4,787  $3,037  
Customer down payments1,018  421  
Liabilities for environmental tax4,824  2,214  
Liabilities for withholding tax1,417  1,941  
Liabilities for VAT555  1,915  
Liabilities for outstanding invoices5,902  8,637  
Liabilities for leases7,598  —  
Other current liabilities6,407  12,328  
Total$32,509  $30,493  
Other long-term liabilities consist of the following:
December 31
20192018
(In thousands)
Employee related liabilities$5,740  $7,008  
Liabilities for asset retirement obligation2,938  2,414  
Environmental protection liabilities1,240  1,353  
Liabilities from build-to-suit lease agreement—  28,657  
Liabilities for leases21,463  —  
Other non-current liabilities9,320  4,729  
Total$40,701  $44,161  
74



For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 0 liabilities for ARO's were settled.
Note J.K. Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurement
The Company measures financial instruments, such as derivatives, at fair value at each balance sheet date. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest. The Company uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximizingRisk management
We have policies governing the use of relevant observable inputsderivative instruments and minimizingdo not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
By using derivative instruments, we are subject to credit and market risk. To minimize counterparty credit (or repayment) risk, we enter into transactions, primarily with investment grade financial institutions. The market risk exposure is not hedged in a manner to completely eliminate the useeffects of unobservable inputs.
All assets and liabilities for which fair value is measuredchanging market conditions on earnings or disclosed in the financial statements are categorized within the following fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level input that iscash flow. No significant to the fair value measurementconcentration of credit risk existed as a whole:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at the measurement date.
Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e., as prices) or indirectly (i.e., derived from prices such as quoted prices for similar items in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar items in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable such as interest rate and yield curves), and market-corroborated inputs.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
For financial assets and liabilities that are recognized in the financial statements on a recurring basis, the Company determines whether transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by re-assessing categorization at the end of each reporting period.
For the years ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018, the Company’s defined benefit pension plan assets were all Level 2 assets. See Note L. - "Employee Benefit Plans" herein for additional information.
The following table shows the fair value measurement at both year-ends December 31, 2019 and 2018. All measurements are based on observable inputs such as interest rates and are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy:
December 31
Fair Value Hierarchy20192018
(In thousands)
Receivables from hedges/ derivatives  $8,436  $9,949  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets Level 2  8,434  9,777  
Other financial assets (non-current) Level 2   172  
Liabilities from derivatives  $9,425  $7,032  
Other current liabilitiesLevel 2  109  2,302  
Other liabilities (non-current) Level 2  9,316  4,730  
Term loan  Level 2  $643,051  $658,163  
Local bank loansLevel 2  $29,762  $28,618  

Note K. Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities2020.
Cash flow hedge
The Company has designated, as of November 28, 2014 the entire interest rate caps entered in 2014 and denominated in Euro with an initial nominal amount of €375.0 million against the Term Loan tranches denominated in Euro with an initial nominal amount of €399.0 million, as well as the entire interest rate caps entered in 2014 and denominated in USD with an initial nominal amount of $350.0 million against Term Loan tranches denominated in USD with an initial nominal amount of $358.0 million with respect to quarterly interest payments exceeding a three months EURIBOR rate of 1.0% and a three months USD-LIBOR rate of 2.5% respectively. On November 14, 2017 the Company acquired floored forward interest rate swaps to hedge interest rate risk on current Euro-denominated term loan financing. On May 15, 2018 the Company entered into a $235.0 million cross-currency swap to hedge interest rate risk on current USD-denominated term loan financing which replaced the USD-denominated Caps terminated on May 14, 2018. In December 2020, the Company unwound $38.0 million of the $235.0 million cross currency swap maturing in 2024 at a realized loss of approximately $2.4 million. In a separate transaction occurring in December 2020, the Company unwound a $30 million swap maturing in 2021 at a realized loss of approximately $3.9 million.
75



The CompanyWe designated the Euro-denominated interest rate caps, the Euro-denominated interest rate swap at closing in November 2017 and the cross-currency swaps at closing in May 2018 in the same manner. The Company hasWe performed a hedge effectiveness test based on the critical terms match method (prospectively) and the dollar offset test (retrospectively), both on designation date and as of December 31, 2019, which confirmed hedge effectiveness..
Net Investment Hedge
To reduce the Company's foreign currency exposure a portion of the U.S. Dollar denominated Term Loan was designated as a hedge of net investment in a foreign operation. Since January 1, 2015In September 2021, the Company had designated $180.0restructured its previously existing cross-currency swaps in the amount of $197 million, ofto align them with the total USDnew U.S. dollar denominated term loan heldcredit facility. Specifically for changes in the loan interest margin of 2.25% (formerly 2.0%) and the three-month USD-LIBOR floor of 0.50% (formerly 0.00%). The cross-currency swap became effective on September 30, 2021 and will expire on September 30, 2028, in line with the maturity of the term loan. This cross-currency swap was determined to be highly effective, continues to qualify for hedge accounting and was cost-neutral.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg55

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Fair value measurement
The following table summarizes outstanding financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020Balance Sheet Classification
Notional AmountFair ValueNotional AmountFair Value
(In millions)
Assets
Derivatives designated as hedges:
Cross currency swaps$197.0 $4.3 $— $— Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Total$197.0 $4.3 $ $ 
Liabilities
Derivatives designated as hedges:
Cross currency swaps$— $— $197.0 $12.7 Other liabilities (non-current)
Interest rate swaps311.5 8.6 337.5 10.1 Other liabilities (non-current)
Total$311.5 $8.6 $534.5 $22.8 
All financial instruments in the table above are classified as Level 2. We present the gross assets and liabilities of our derivative financial instruments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
For financial assets and liabilities that are recognized in the financial statements on a recurring basis, the Company determines whether transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by re-assessing categorization at the end of each reporting period. There were no transfers of assets measured at fair value between Level 1 and Level 2 and there were no Level 3 investments during fiscal 2021 and 2020.
The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of our financial instruments that are not measured at fair value on a Germany-based subsidiary asrecurring basis for the hedging instrument to hedge the change in net assets of a US subsidiary, which is held by a Germany-based subsidiary, to manage foreign currency risk.periods presented. Due to the new hedging approach andshort maturity, the new cross currency swap as described above, hedge accounting for the net investment hedge was discontinued on May 15, 2018. An unrealized loss of $2.2 million remains within other comprehensive income until it is recycled through profit and loss upon divestment of the hedged item.
Changes in fair value of all non-derivative financial instruments included in Current assets and Current liabilities for which the effective portioncarrying value approximates fair value are excluded from the table below. Short-term and long-term debt are recorded at amortized cost in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Notional AmountFair ValueNotional AmountFair Value
(In millions)
Non-derivatives:
Liabilities:
Term loan$639.0 $637.2 $668.0 $668.0 
Term-Loan in the table above is classified as Level 2.
At both December 31, 2021 and 2020, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and short term borrowings and variable rate debt approximated their carrying values due to the hedging instrument'sshort-term nature of these instruments.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg56

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The following tables summarize the pre-tax effect of derivative and non-derivative instruments recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss (“AOCI”), the gains or losses are reported as foreign currency translation(losses) reclassified from AOCI to earnings and additional gains or losses(losses) recognized directly in earnings:
Effect of Financial Instruments
Year Ended December 31, 2021
Gain (Loss) Recognized in AOCIGain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI to IncomeAdditional Gain (Loss) Recognized in IncomeIncome Statement Classification
(In millions)
Derivatives designated as hedges:
Cross currency swaps$2.4 $(0.5)$— Interest and other financial expense, net
Interest rate swaps1.5 — — Interest and other financial expense, net
Total$3.9 $(0.5)$ 
Effect of Financial Instruments
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Gain (Loss) Recognized in AOCIGain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI to IncomeAdditional Gain (Loss) Recognized in IncomeIncome Statement Classification
(In millions)
Derivatives designated as hedges:
Cross currency swaps$(1.0)$— $(6.0)Interest and other financial expense, net
Interest rate swaps(2.3)— — Interest and other financial expense, net
Total$(3.3)$ $(6.0)
Effect of Financial Instruments
Year Ended December 31, 2019
Gain (Loss) Recognized in AOCIGain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI to IncomeAdditional Gain (Loss) Recognized in IncomeIncome Statement Classification
(In millions)
Derivatives designated as hedges:
Cross currency swaps$(1.9)$— $(1.5)Interest and other financial expense, net
Interest rate swaps(5.3)— — Interest and other financial expense, net
Total$(7.2)$ $(1.5)
The amount recognized in AOCI while changesrelated to cash flow hedges that will be reclassified to the Consolidated Statement of Operations in the ineffective portion are reported in earnings. Effectivenessnext twelve months is assessed based on the hypothetical derivative method. There was no ineffectiveness in either of the years ended December 31, 2018 or 2017. The gains or losses on derivative instruments reported in AOCI are reclassified to earnings in the period in which earnings are affected by the underlying item, such as a disposal or substantial liquidations of the entities being hedged.approximately $1.9 million.
Due to the new hedging approach and the newOur cross currency swap described above, hedge accounting for the net investment hedge was discontinued on May 15, 2018. Thus in 2018, with the change of the reporting currency, Orion decided to de-designate the net investment hedge. Foreign currency risk exposure is reduced by using a cross-currency-swap,swaps designated as a cash flow hedge. Cumulative gainshedge of principal and losses recognizedinterest payments related to our Term Loan matures in AOCI from the net investment hedge will continue to be recorded in AOCI until disposal of the U.S. business.
Thus, an unrealized loss of $2.2 million remains within other comprehensive income until it is recycled through profit and loss upon divestment of the hedged item.September 2028.
Note L. Employee Benefit Plans
Provisions for pensions are established to cover defined benefit plans for retirement, disability and surviving dependents’dependents��� pensions. The benefit obligations vary depending on the legal, tax and economic circumstances in the various countries in which the Company operates. Generally, the level of benefit depends on the length of service and the remuneration.
In 2019We have defined benefit plans in Germany and 2018,South Korea for which Germany accounted for approximately 91.8%93.2% and 90.1%,93.3% in 2021 and 2020, respectively, of provisions for projected defined benefit pension plan obligations. Effective at the end of 2013, all defined benefit plans in Germany were modified to close access to new participants and freeze benefits accrued under these plans at December 31, 2013 levels. Interest expense on the frozen obligation relating to these plans will continue to accrue.
There are also defined contribution pension plans in Germany and the United States for which the Company makes regular contributions to off-balance sheet pension funds managed by third party insurance companies.
In South Korea, the company’s pension plan provides, at the option of employees for either projected benefit or defined contribution benefits. Plan assets relating to this plan reduce the pension provision disclosed.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg57

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Obligations and Funded Status
The following provides information about projected benefit obligations, plan assets, the funded status and weighted-average assumptions of the defined benefit pension plan:
Change in Projected Benefit ObligationDecember 31
20192018
(In thousands)
Present value of projected benefit obligation at the beginning of the year$67,623  $72,864  
Actuarial (gain)/ loss11,983  (198) 
Service cost588  604  
Interest cost1,694  1,758  
Benefits paid(1,346) (925) 
Other—  126  
Curtailments, settlements, special and contractual termination benefits—  (2,154) 
Currency translation(1,153) (4,452) 
Present value of projected benefit obligation at the end of the year$79,389  $67,623  
76



Change in Projected Benefit ObligationDecember 31
20212020
(In millions)
Present value of projected benefit obligation at the beginning of the year$91.3 $79.4 
Actuarial (gain)/ loss(1.7)4.9 
Service cost0.5 0.6 
Interest cost1.0 1.2 
Benefits paid(1.3)(1.7)
Curtailments, settlements, special and contractual termination benefits(0.8)— 
Currency translation(7.1)6.9 
Present value of projected benefit obligation at the end of the year$81.9 $91.3 
Based on the weighted Macaulay method the projected benefit obligation has a duration of 21.020.0 years (prior year: 21.2 years).(21.0 years in 2020 ).
Change in Plan AssetsChange in Plan AssetsDecember 31Change in Plan AssetsDecember 31
2019201820212020
(In thousands)(In millions)
Fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the yearFair value of plan assets at the beginning of the year$6,391  $7,474  Fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the year$6.8 $6.6 
Actual return on plan assetsActual return on plan assets119  (79) Actual return on plan assets0.1 0.1 
Employer contributionsEmployer contributions552  609  Employer contributions0.7 0.3 
Actuarial gain/(loss)—  —  
Benefits paidBenefits paid(277) —  Benefits paid— (0.5)
SettlementSettlement—  (1,467) Settlement(0.7)— 
Other adjustments—  174  
Currency translationCurrency translation(205) (320) Currency translation(0.6)0.3 
Fair value of plan assets at the end of the yearFair value of plan assets at the end of the year$6,580  $6,391  Fair value of plan assets at the end of the year$6.3 $6.8 
The plan assets are held by Orion Engineered Carbons Co. Ltd. Korea, Bupyeong-gu, South Korea, and relate to qualifying insurance policies. These insurance policies do not have a quoted market price. The actual return on plan assets amounted to $0.1 million and $0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively.
Net Funded StatusDecember 31
20192018
(In thousands)
Projected benefit obligation$79,389  $67,623  
Fair value of plan assets6,580  6,391  
Net funded status$72,809  $61,232  
Net Unfunded StatusDecember 31
20212020
(In millions)
Projected benefit obligation$81.9 $91.3 
Less: Fair value of plan assets
6.3 6.8 
Net unfunded status$75.6 $84.5 
Amount Recognized in the Consolidated Balance SheetsDecember 31
20212020
(In millions)
Non-current assets$— $— 
Current liabilities1.2 1.2 
Non-current liabilities74.4 83.3 
Net liability recognized - pension plans$75.6 $84.5 
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
58

Amount Recognized in the Consolidated Balance SheetsDecember 31
20192018
(In thousands)
Non-current assets  $—  $—  
Current liabilities  908  855  
Non-current liabilities  71,901  60,377  
Net liability recognized - pension plans$72,809  $61,232  
Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Pension Assumptions and Strategy
The assumptions in the table below were used in the actuarial valuation of the underlying the obligations:
AssumptionsDecember 31
20192018
Discount rate1.0 %1.9 %
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets2.0 %2.0 %
Rate of compensation/salary increase3.0 %3.0 %
Future pension increase1.5 %1.5 %
MortalityHeubeck
2018G
Heubeck
2018G
77



AssumptionsDecember 31
20212020
Discount rate1.5 %0.6 %
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets1.8 %2.0 %
Rate of compensation/salary increase3.0 %3.0 %
Future pension increase1.6 %1.5 %
MortalityHeubeck
2018G
Heubeck
2018G
Mortality is based on Heubeck guidelines, the generally accepted biometric calculation bases for the balance sheet valuation of pension obligations in Germany. A 0.5% increase or decrease in the discount rate or in the future pension increase would have impacted the projected benefit obligation as follows:
SensitivitiesDecember 31, 2019
Discount rateFuture pension increase
0.5% decrease0.5% increase0.5% decrease0.5% increase
(In thousands)
Impact on projected benefit obligation  $7,481  $(6,485) $(9,496) $10,526  

SensitivitiesDecember 31, 2021
Discount rateFuture pension increase
0.5% decrease0.5% increase0.5% decrease0.5% increase
(In millions)
Impact on projected benefit obligation$7.4 $(6.5)$(9.2)$10.2 
Net Periodic Pension Cost (Benefit)
Years Ended December 31,
201920182017
(In thousands) 
Service cost$588  $604  $772  
Interest cost1,694  1,758  1,723  
Expected return on plan assets(119) (174) (180) 
Past service cost/(income) and other adjustments—  253  145  
Net periodic pension cost$2,163  $2,441  $2,460  
Effective at the end of 2013, all defined benefit plans in Germany were modified to close access to new participants and freeze benefits accrued under these plans at December 31, 2013 levels. Interest expense on the frozen obligation relating to these plans will continue to accrue. In addition, 1 program during the year ended December 31, 2016 ceased due to the closure of our Ambès (France) plant.
Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
(In millions)
Service cost$0.5 $0.6 $0.6 
Interest cost1.0 1.2 1.7 
Expected return on plan assets(0.1)(0.1)(0.1)
Net periodic pension cost$1.4 $1.7 $2.2 
The total expected defined benefit pension contribution amounts to $1.3 million in 2020.2022.
The Company paid $13.9$15.0 million, $12.8$12.5 million and $12.8$13.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, respectively, for state defined contribution pension schemes (statutory pension insurance) in Germany and other countries. This amount is also recognized as personnel expenses (social security costs).in Cost of sales and in Selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
The Company expects that the following benefit payments will be made to plan participants in the years from 20192022 to 2029:2031:
Benefit paymentsBenefit payments(In thousands)Benefit payments(In millions)
2020$1,254  
2021$1,471  
20222022$1,707  2022$1.7 
20232023$1,902  20232.0 
20242024$2,004  20242.7 
2025 - 2029$13,029  
202520252.4 
202620262.1 
2027 - 20312027 - 203114.8 
The Company does not anticipate making funding contributions to the Pension Plan in 2020.2022.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg59

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Income)/Loss
Overall net actuarial loss amounts to $12.3 million and comprises $12.0 million pension-related and $0.3 million other personnel-related.
Amounts recognized in AOCI atas of December 31, 20192021, 2020 and 20182019 related to the Company's defined benefit pension plan were as follows:
78
Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Income) / LossDecember 31
202120202019
(In millions)
Net actuarial (gain) loss$(1.7)$4.9 $12.0 
Net prior service cost— — — 
Balance in accumulated other comprehensive (income) / loss$(1.7)$4.9 $12.0 



Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Income) / LossDecember 31
20192018
(In thousands)
Net actuarial (gain) loss$11,983  $(198) 
Net prior service cost—  —  
Balance in accumulated other comprehensive (income) / loss$11,983  $(198) 
TheNo amount is estimated amounts that willto be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost in 2020:
2020
(In thousands)
Net actuarial (gain) loss$9,752 
Prior service cost (credit)— 
Net amount recognized$9,752 
2022.
Plan Assets
The fair value (all Level 2) of Orion's pension plan assets atas of December 31, 20192021 and 2018, by asset category, is2020, are as follows:
December 31
20192018
(In thousands)
Equity securities$—  $—  
Debt securities—  —  
Other securities6,580  6,391  
Total pension plan assets$6,580  $6,391  
December 31
20212020
(In millions)
Government and corporate fixed income financial instruments6.3 6.8 
Total pension plan assets$6.3 $6.8 

Defined Contribution Plans
We provide tax-qualified retirement contribution plans in the United States for the benefit of all full-time employees. The plans are designed to provide employees with an accumulation of funds for retirement on a tax-deferred basis. For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 the Company contributions to the Employee Savings Plans were $1.9 million, $2.6 million and $2.9 million, respectively.

Note M. Stock-Based Compensation
On an annual basis since 2015, the Company has implemented a long-term incentive plan ("LTIP") which grants awards to employees and officers selected by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”). PSUPerformance-based Restricted Stock Unit (“PSU”) awards are earned based on achievement against one or more performance metrics established by the Compensation Committee in respect of a specified performance period. Earned PSUs range from zero to a specified maximum percentage of a participant’s target award based on the performanceachievement of applicable performance metrics, and are subject to vesting terms based on continued employment.
The first performance period ran from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017, with PSUs earned based on achievement of EBITDA metrics established by the Compensation Committee and total shareholder return relative to a peer group. Once earned and vested, PSUs were settled in one share of Company common stock per vested PSU (or, at the Company’s election, cash equal to the fair market value thereof). There is no exercise price. The first vesting period ran through March 31, 2018 (the “2015 Plan”). All PSUs are granted under, and are subject to the terms and conditions of, the Company’s 2014 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, and do not increase the number of shares previously reserved for issuance under that plan. On August 2, 2016 the Compensation Committee established a consecutive LTIP (the “2016 Plan”) having consistent terms as compared to the 2015 Plan. On March 31, 2019 the vesting period ended for the “2016 Plan” and earned and vested PSUs settled in one common share of the Company per vested PSU - issued to participants on April 30, 2019, except for certain PSUs settled in cash at fair market value to cover wage taxes or as substitute for share transfer restrictions. On July 31, 2017 the Compensation Committee established another consecutive LTIP (the "2017 Plan") having consistent terms as compared to the 2015 and 2016 Plan. On July 12, 2018 the Compensation Committee established a consecutive LTIP (the "2018 Plan") and on July 16, 2019 the Compensation Committee established a consecutive LTIP (the “2019 Plan”). The achievement metrics have changed for the 2019 Plan from EBITDA performance to a 'return on capital employed' and a 'total shareholder return' target. All PSUs are granted under, and are subject to the terms and conditions of, the Company’s 2014 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”).
In its “2019 Plan”The Company also issues Restricted Stock Units (“RSU”) in certain instances, under the company issued beside PSUs ("2019 Plan PSU") also a tranche of restricted share units (“RSUs”)LTIP plans, as sign-on incentives and one-time grants for its selected employees and officers ("2019 Plan RSU").who are non-participants in the LTIP plans. These RSUs vest by one-thirdratably over a three-year period and vesting occurs on each of the first, second and third anniversary of the hire date related to the sign-on grants and the grant date.date for the grants to employees who are non-participants in the LTIP plans.
Under the LTIP plans, the PSU vesting period is three years with cliff vesting occurring on December 31 of the second full year subsequent to the date of the grant. For example, if a PSU grant was issued in June 2020 the PSUs would fully vest on December 31, 2022 with no ratable vesting during the vesting period. The RSUs are subject to certain further restrictions after vesting. Settlementvesting period is ratably over three years starting on January 1 in the year of selected employees and officer RSUs is within 75 days following the grant. For example, the employee would earn one third anniversaryof the RSU on December 31 starting in the year of the grant date.and the remaining two thirds each December 31 for 2 years immediately subsequent to the year of the grant.
79
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
60


Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Specific Members of our Executive Committee received RSUs upon signing. These sign-on RSUs are split into three parts each with service periods of one year and therefore vest on year one, two or three after the grant date.
In April 2018 the Compensation Committee established a stock compensation plan for the Board of Directors under the existing Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan.
The following table provides detail as to expenses recorded within operating income with respect to stock based compensation:
Years Ended December 31,
201920182017
(In thousands) 
2015 Plan$—  $777  $2,736  
2016 Plan1,083  4,566  4,053  
2017 Plan3,016  5,052  2,046  
Stock compensation plan for Board of Directors561  563  —  
2018 Plan3,435  2,961  —  
Sign on RSU incentive453  —  —  
2019 Plan891  —  —  
Total expenses$9,438  $13,919  $8,835  
Performance-based Restricted Stock Units
In the following table summarizes the activity of our PSUs within year ended December 31, 2019:2021:
Period grantedPerformance periodPSUs outstanding at January 1,PSUs grantedPerformance based adjustmentPSUs settledPSUs forfeitedPSUs outstanding at December 31,PSUs expected to vestWeighted average grant date fair value
20162016 - 2019677,607  —  299,499  (977,106) —  —  —  $17.21  
20172017 - 2020467,349  —  —  —  (49,097) 418,252  401,904  $24.89  
20182018 - 2021450,034  —  —  —  (94,268) 355,766  299,418  $39.24  
20192019 - 2022—  332,891  —  —  (103,164) 229,727  215,933  $11.48  
Total 20191,594,990  332,891  299,499  (977,106) (246,529) 1,003,745  917,255  
Total 20181,610,894  450,977  110,215  (557,337) (19,759) 1,594,990  1,556,011  
Total 20171,145,238  474,660  —  —  (9,004) 1,610,894  1,433,440  
Number of unitsWeighted-average grant-date fair value per unit
Unvested at January 1, 2021498,352 $11.55 
Granted360,178 19.01 
Forfeited(70,195)15.98 
Unvested at December 31, 2021788,335 $14.97 
During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we granted 290,906 and 332,891 performance-based units, respectively, with a per unit weighted-average grant-date fair value of $11.60 and $11.48, respectively. The 2019 performance-based PSU grants expired as the performance conditions were not met.
Restricted Stock Units
In the following table summarizes the activity of our Individual RSUs within year ended December 31, 2019:2021:
Period grantedVesting periodRSUs outstanding January 1,RSUs grantedPerformance based adjustmentRSUs settledRSUs forfeitedRSUs outstanding at December 31,RSUs expected to vestWeighted average grant date fair value
Sign-on RSUs:
20182018 - 202135,817  —  —  (11,939) —  23,878  23,878  $25.81  
20192019 - 2022—  45,257  —  —  —  45,257  45,257  $15.89  
2019 Plan:
20192019 - 2022—  173,940  —  —  (45,493) 128,447  128,447  $14.74  
Total 201935,817  219,197  —  (11,939) (45,493) 197,582  197,582  
Total 2018—  35,817  —  —  —  35,817  35,817  
Total 2017—  —  —  —  —  —  —  
Number of unitsWeighted-average grant-date fair value per unit
Unvested at January 1, 2021370,427 $14.53 
Granted214,225 18.46 
Settled(54,048)19.92 
Forfeited(16,005)14.09 
Unvested at December 31, 2021514,599 $16.09 
In the year ended December 31, 2021, the vested service-based units had an aggregate grant-date fair value of $1.1 million. During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we granted 182,930 and 219,197 service-based units, respectively, with a per unit weighted-average grant-date fair value of $12.75 and $15.65, respectively. In the year ended December 31, 2020 no RSUs vested. In the year ended December 31, 2019, the vested service-based units had an aggregate grant-date fair value of $0.3 million.
Certain members of our Board of Directors receive compensation in form of restricted shares (“RSs”) in accordance with the 2014 Non-employee Director Plan. Under this plan 24,08034,524 RSs are currently outstanding. The RSs will vest and become non-forfeitable on April 30, 2020, the first anniversary of the grant date.
80



AtAs of December 31, 2019,2021, we had unrecognized compensation cost of $9.5$9.0 million, based on the target amounts, related to unvested PSUs, RSUs and RSs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.61.79 years.
During 2021, 2020 and 2019 fiscal years, we recognized compensation expenses of $5.2 million, $4.4 million and $9.4 million, respectively, in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
61
The closing price of the Company's shares and therefore the intrinsic value of one PSU or RSU outstanding was $19.30 as of December 31, 2019, $25.28 as of December 31, 2018 and $25.60 as of December 31, 2017. Total intrinsic value of PSUs and RSUs amounted to $23.2 million as of December 31, 2019, $41.2 million as of December 31, 2018 and $41.2 million as of December 31, 2017.
The following table lists the inputs

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the valuation model used for calculating the grant date fair values under the 2019, 2018 and 2017 Plans:
2017 Plan2018 Plan2019 Plan PSU
Expected term (in years)333
Dividend yield (%)1.88%  1.94%  4.65%  
Expected volatility OEC (%)33.77%  30.22%  33.30%  
Expected volatility peer group (%)17.30%  20.09%  17.62%  
Correlation0.4574  0.3659  0.5205  
Risk-free interest rate (%)1.45%  1.46%  1.83%  
Model usedMonte CarloMonte CarloMonte Carlo
Weighted average fair value of PSUs granted$24.89  $39.24  $11.48  
In April 2019, 977,106 PSUs (including performance adjustment of 299,499 PSUs) were exercised for the 2016 Plan. In April 2018, 557,337 PSUs (including performance adjustment of 110,215 PSUs) were exercised for the 2015 Plan. The expected term of share awards represents the weighted average period the share awards are expected to remain outstanding. The remaining contractual terms of share units outstanding is April 2020 for the 2017 Plan, April 2021 for the 2018 Plan and April 2022 for the 2019 Plan.
The Company used a combination of historical and implied volatility of its traded shares, or blended volatility, in deriving the expected volatility assumption. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for the term of stock options. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company's history.
Stock-based compensation expense is compromised of the following line items:
Years Ended December 31,
201920182017
(In thousands) 
Cost of sales$139  $55  $73  
Selling expenses1,412  2,711  1,637  
General and administrative expenses7,364  10,394  6,658  
Research and development costs523  759  467  
Stock-based compensation expense$9,438  $13,919  $8,835  
The assumption for estimating expected forfeitures is based on previous experience and based on 3% leavers rate per year. Actual forfeitures are in addition recorded as they occur.
81



Consolidated Financial Statements
Note N. Restructuring Expenses
Details of all restructuring activities and the related reserves for December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
Personnel
expenses
Demolition and
Removal costs
Ground
remediation
costs
OtherTotal
(In thousands) 
Provision at January 1, 2017$6,453  $4,880  $3,795  $1,547  $16,675  
Charges2,975  1,440  —  2,076  6,492  
Cost charged against liabilities (assets)—  (153) —  (114) (267) 
Cash paid(9,295) (3,849) —  (2,474) (15,618) 
Foreign currency translation adjustment513  505  522  (105) 1,435  
Provision at December 31, 2017646  2,824  4,317  930  8,717  
Charges7,586  1,978  2,919  3,137  15,620  
Cost charged against liabilities (assets)(324) (14) (833) (8) (1,180) 
Cash paid(5,825) (2,182) (3,259) (3,202) (14,468) 
Foreign currency translation adjustment252  (64) (206) (13) (32) 
Provision at December 31, 20182,334  2,541  2,939  844  8,658  
Charges2,801   268   3,080  
Cost charged against liabilities (assets)—  —  —  —  —  
Cash paid(1,727) (1,953) (2,610) (508) (6,798) 
Foreign currency translation adjustment(9) (36) (109) (20) (175) 
Provision at December 31, 2019$3,400  $561  $488  $317  $4,765  
Orion's reserves for restructuring are reflected in accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The expenses relate to the Company’s effort to restructure its Rubber segment. As a first step the Company's German operating subsidiary terminated with effect as of December 31, 2016, the Contract Manufacturing Agreement then in place between the Company's German operating subsidiary and the Company's French subsidiary, Orion Engineered Carbons SAS ("OEC SAS"), which has a plant in Ambès with a maximum capacity of mostly standard rubber grades of 50 kmt per year. Consequently, the management of OEC SAS concluded consultations with the local Works Council at this facility to implement a restructuring and down staffing with a cessation of production at the site by the end of 2016. Impairment charges of $10.3 million related to the property, plant and equipment of OEC SAS were calculated based on an estimated recoverable amount of 0 and are fully charged to the Rubber Carbon Black segment.
The restructuring of the South Korean footprint concluded in the second quarter of 2018 resulting in cessation of production at the Bupyeong plant and the sale of the land to a third party. Restructuring income of $40.3 million reflects the proceeds of the land sale less the remaining book value of the land. Restructuring expenses comprise required costs for land restoration of $7.2 million and cost to consolidate the 2 South Korean production sites into one remaining site, including in particular personnel related termination costs of $4.4 million incurred in fiscal year 2018.
In the periods ending December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 restructuring expense, net amounted to $3.6 million as compared to restructuring income, net of $24.6 million and restructuring expense, net of $6.5 million, respectively.

82



Note O. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Changes in each component of AOCI, net of tax, are as follows for fiscal 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017:2019:

Currency Translation AdjustmentsHedging Activities AdjustmentsPension and Other Postretirement Benefit Liability AdjustmentTotal
(In thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2017$4,378  $(15,262) $(7,064) $(17,948) 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications(4,077) 20,970  670  17,563  
Income tax effects before reclassifications(855) (7,216) (217) (8,288) 
Amounts reclassified from AOCI—  —  9,687  9,687  
Income tax effects on reclassifications—  —  (3,131) (3,131) 
Currency translation AOCI—  (293) (2,910) (3,203) 
Balance at December 31, 2017(554) (1,801) (2,965) (5,320) 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications(8,918) (6,349) 198  (15,069) 
Income tax effects before reclassifications(1,178) 1,719  (64) 477  
Amounts reclassified from AOCI—  —  —  —  
Income tax effects on reclassifications—  —  —  —  
Currency translation AOCI—  284  —  284  
Balance at December 31, 2018(10,650) (6,147) (2,831) (19,628) 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications(1,454) (7,283) (12,288) (21,026) 
Income tax effects before reclassifications(177) 2,454  4,020  6,297  
Amounts reclassified from AOCI—  —  —  —  
Income tax effects on reclassifications—  —  —  —  
Currency translation AOCI—  85  (90) (5) 
Balance at December 31, 2019$(12,281) $(10,891) $(11,189) $(34,362) 

Currency Translation AdjustmentsHedging Activities AdjustmentsPension and Other Postretirement Benefit Liability AdjustmentTotal
(In millions)
Balance at January 1, 2019$(10.6)$(6.2)$(2.8)$(19.6)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications(1.4)(7.3)(12.3)(21.0)
Income tax effects before reclassifications(0.1)2.4 4.0 6.3 
Currency translation AOCI— 0.1 (0.1)— 
Balance at December 31, 2019(12.1)(11.0)(11.2)(34.3)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications(13.1)(2.6)(5.3)(21.0)
Income tax effects before reclassifications(1.3)0.8 1.8 1.3 
Amounts reclassified from AOCI— — 9.9 9.9 
Income tax effects on reclassifications— — (3.3)(3.3)
Currency translation AOCI— (0.7)(0.6)(1.3)
Balance at December 31, 2020(26.5)(13.5)(8.7)(48.7)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications(7.3)2.3 2.0 (3.0)
Income tax effects before reclassifications(0.3)(0.7)(0.7)(1.7)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI— — 4.8 4.8 
Income tax effects on reclassifications— — (1.6)(1.6)
Currency translation AOCI— 1.1 0.6 1.7 
Balance at December 31,2021$(34.1)$(10.8)$(3.6)$(48.5)
The amounts reclassified outrecorded in prior years in AOCI exceeding 10% of AOCIthe defined benefit obligation are recorded ratably as reclassification of actuarial losses over the current year through profit and into the Consolidated Statement of Operationsloss separately from income from operations and amounted to $4.8 million and $9.9 million for the fiscal years endedend December 31, 2019, 20182021 and 2017 are as follows:
Years Ended December 31,
201920182017
(In thousands)
Amortization of actuarial losses (gains)(recorded in interest and other finance expense, net)$—  $—  $9,687  
Total before tax—  —  9,687  
Tax impact—  —  (3,131) 
Total after tax$—  $—  $6,556  

2020 respectively.
Note P.O. Earnings Per Share
Basic EPSearnings per share (“EPS”) is calculatedcomputed by dividing the profit for the yearnet income attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parentOrion by the weighted average number of ordinary sharescommon stock outstanding during the year.
period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing the profit for the year (numerator)equals net income attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parentOrion divided by the weighted average number of ordinary sharescommon stock outstanding during the year plusperiod, adjusted for the weighted average numberdilutive effect of ordinary shares arising from exercising all dilutive ordinary shares (denominator).
83



our stock–based and other equity compensation awards.
The following table reflects the income and share data used in the basic and diluted EPS computations:
Years Ended December 31,
201920182017
Net income for the period - attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent (in thousands)$86,920  $121,310  $64,860  
Weighted average number of ordinary shares (in thousands of shares)59,986  59,567  59,320  
Basic EPS$1.45  $2.04  $1.09  
Dilutive effect of share based payments (in thousands of shares)1,313  1,482  1,354  
Weighted average number of diluted ordinary shares (in thousands of shares)61,300  61,049  60,674  
Diluted EPS$1.42  $1.99  $1.07  
Years Ended December 31,
Dollars in millions, shares in thousands and per share amount in dollars202120202019
Net income for the period - attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent$134.7 $18.2 $86.9 
Weighted average number of ordinary shares60,708 60,430 59,986 
Basic EPS$2.22 $0.30 $1.45 
Dilutive effect of share based payments243 977 1,314 
Weighted average number of diluted ordinary shares60,951 61,407 61,300 
Diluted EPS$2.21 $0.30 $1.42 
For 2017
oec-20211231_g1.jpg62

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the weighted average numberConsolidated Financial Statements
Note P. Income Taxes
The Company operates in multiple jurisdictions with complex tax and regulatory environments and our income tax returns are periodically audited or subjected to review by tax authorities. We monitor tax law changes and the potential impact to our results of shares equals the outstanding number of shares. In 2018 repurchases of treasury shares were taken into account on a daily basis. In 2018 and 2019 new shares were generated and transferred for settlement of stock based compensation ("2015 Plan", "2016 Plan", and "RSU Plan"), which was also includedoperations including potential proposals in the weighted numberU.S. as a result of shares. The dilutive effect of the share-based payment transaction is the weighted number of shares considering the grant date, forfeitures and executions during the respective fiscal years. The effect is determined by using the treasury stock method.
Note Q. Income Taxes
a new administration. Tax provision (benefit) for income taxes consisted of the following:
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
201920182017202120202019
(In thousands) (In millions)
CurrentCurrentCurrent
Domestic (1)
Domestic (1)
$16,250  $9,166  $12,775  
Domestic (1)
$21.7 $16.3 $
ForeignForeign1,140  41,412  14,628  Foreign9.7 4.0 1.1 
TotalTotal17,390  50,578  27,403  Total31.4 20.3 17.4 
DeferredDeferredDeferred
Domestic (1)
Domestic (1)
$7,412  $6,164  $5,853  
Domestic (1)
(1.4)(4.9)7.4 
ForeignForeign8,414  (9,798) (13,520) Foreign21.7 (7.3)8.5 
TotalTotal15,826  (3,634) (7,667) Total20.3 (12.2)15.9 
Provision for income taxesProvision for income taxes$33,216  $46,944  $19,736  Provision for income taxes$51.7 $8.1 $33.3 
(1) Domestic refers to Germany.
Income before income taxes for fiscal years 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 is as follows:
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
201920182017202120202019
(In thousands) (In millions)
Domestic (1)
Domestic (1)
$112,427  $115,594  $121,061  
Domestic (1)
$$25.6 $
ForeignForeign7,710  52,660  (36,465) Foreign97.2 0.7 7.7 
Income before income taxesIncome before income taxes$120,137  $168,254  $84,596  Income before income taxes$186.4 $26.3 $120.2 
(1) Domestic refers to Germany.
A statutory corporate income tax rate of 15.00% was used to calculate the current and deferred taxes for the German entities. A solidarity surcharge of 0.825% (calculated as 5.5% on the corporate income tax rate) and a trade tax rate of 16.18%, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, respectively, were also taken into accountreflected in the calculation. As a result, the overall statutory income tax rate for the German entities was 32.00%, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017 respectively.2019. The current and deferred taxes for the non-German entities were calculated using their respective country-specific tax rates.












oec-20211231_g1.jpg63

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The following tax reconciliation shows the difference between the expected income taxes using the German overall statutory income tax rate of 32.0% and the effective income taxes in the income statement, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017, respectively. The German tax rate is applied due to the fact that the primary operating entity is located in Germany and this entity holds all non-German operations.2019.
84



Years Ended December 31,
201920182017
(In thousands) 
Income before income taxes$120,137  $168,254  $84,596  
Expected income tax thereon$38,444  $53,841  $27,071  
Tax rate differential(3,517) (6,695) (2,249) 
Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets and for losses without recognition of deferred taxes450  (204) (3,689) 
Change in the tax rate and tax laws115  (802) (9,543) 
Income taxes for prior years(3,247) 876  561  
Tax on non-deductible interest expenses1,232  1,096  1,522  
Taxes on other non-deductible expenses, and non-deductible taxes745  (893) 6,216  
Effects of changes in permanent differences(45) 96  (879) 
Tax effect on tax-free income(898) (532) (1,033) 
Other tax effects(63) 161  1,759  
Effective income taxes as reported$33,216  $46,944  $19,736  
Effective tax rate27.65 %27.90 %23.33 %
Change in the tax rate and tax laws in an amount of $8.8 million are related to the effect of the U.S. tax reform enacted in December 2017 reducing the corporate income tax rate from 35.0% to 21.0% in the USA. As a result the net deferred tax liabilities for the US entities are now based on the new tax rate of 21.0%.
Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
(In millions)
Income before income taxes$186.4 $26.3 $120.2 
Expected income tax thereon59.6 8.4 38.4 
Tax rate differential(9.8)(1.4)(3.5)
Change in valuation allowance(6.0)(1.3)0.5 
Change in the tax rate and tax laws— (0.1)0.1 
Non-deductible interest expenses1.2 1.1 1.2 
Non-deductible expenses, and non-deductible taxes5.4 2.8 0.7 
Tax effect on tax-free income(0.4)(0.2)(0.9)
Other tax effects1.7 (1.2)(3.2)
Effective income taxes as reported$51.7 $8.1 $33.3 
Effective tax rate27.74 %30.80 %27.65 %
Other non-deductible expenses and non-deductible taxes include taxes for Brazil (treated as a disregarded entity for U.S. tax purposes) which are non-creditable in the U.S. were $2.3$2.4 million, $1.6$0.9 million and $1.4$2.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, 2018respectively. Non-deductible taxes include taxes from Brazil which is a disregarded entity for U.S. tax purposes.
The unfavorable tax effect from other non-deductible expenses and 2017, respectively,non-deductible taxes were mainly driven by non-deductible expenses in connection with the reduced corporate incomeCompany’s LTIP and non creditable taxes in Brazil in 2021.
The favorable effect from changes in valuation allowance on deferred tax rate from 35.0% to 21.0% in the USA (U.S. tax reform enacted in December 2017).
Tax rate differentialassets for the year ended December 31, 2018 are2021 included the impact mainly driven by a benefit $6.3 million from taxable income resultingBrazil and Germany related to the judgment on the realization of deferred tax assets.
Tax effect from a land sale completedchanges in Korea during 2018.
Income taxesvaluation allowance on deferred tax assets for prior yearsthe year ended December 31, 2019 are mainly driven by2020 included the impact from lower pre-tax earnings attributed to the economic downturn from COVID-19. Also included was a benefit from the resultfavorable change of the conclusionvaluation allowance related to U.S. tax credits of a tax audit in Poland. The amounts set in accruals for this purpose were released accordingly in 2019.$3.6 million.
Income tax expense recognized in the consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operationsOperations were $33.2$51.7 million in 2019, $46.92021, $8.1 million in 20182020 and $19.7$33.3 million in 2017.2019. Tax expenses/expense/(benefit) recognized directly into thein equity were $(4.0) million in 2021, $(1.1) million in 2020 and $6.2 million in 2019, $0.3 million in 2018 and $(8.5) million in 2017.2019.
85
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
64


Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Significant components of deferred income taxes were as follows:
December 31
20212020
(In millions)
Deferred tax assetsDeferred tax assetsDecember 31Deferred tax assets
20192018
(In thousands)
Assets
Intangible assets$197  $842  
Property, plant and equipment8,363  8,963  
Financial assets Financial assets7,004  7,044   Financial assets$— $7.9 
Inventories Inventories2,817  4,131   Inventories3.3 3.4 
Receivables, other assets3,212  1,207  
Liabilities
Provisions20,662  18,825  
Liabilities41,434  31,093  
Other
Deferred compensation Deferred compensation15.8 16.8 
Liabilities including leases liabilities Liabilities including leases liabilities36.3 26.9 
Loss carryforwardsLoss carryforwards39,595  43,753  Loss carryforwards47.0 39.8 
Interest carryforwardsInterest carryforwards9,967  9,041  Interest carryforwards9.8 11.2 
Tax creditsTax credits3,185  1,022  Tax credits8.4 4.3 
Total deferred tax assetsTotal deferred tax assets120.6 110.3 
Deferred tax asset valuation allowancesDeferred tax asset valuation allowances(36.3)(42.7)
Net deferred tax assetsNet deferred tax assets$84.3 67.6 
Deferred Tax LiabilitiesDeferred Tax Liabilities
Intangible assets Intangible assets$2.9 $3.5 
Property, plant and equipment including right of use assets Property, plant and equipment including right of use assets65.9 30.5 
Financial assets Financial assets1.0 — 
Receivables, other assets Receivables, other assets14.3 9.2 
OtherOther2,028  2,750  Other11.6 10.6 
Total deferred tax assets (gross)138,463  128,671  
Valuation allowance(41,994) (40,905) 
Total deferred tax assets (net)$96,468  $87,766  
Total deferred tax liabilitiesTotal deferred tax liabilities$95.7 $53.8 
Net deferred tax assets / (liabilities)Net deferred tax assets / (liabilities)$(11.4)$13.8 
Our net deferred tax assets and liabilities reflected in our balance sheet are as follows:
Net deferred tax positionDecember 31
20212020
(In millions)
Deferred tax assets
Net deferred tax assets$50.4 $52.6 
Deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax liabilities61.8 38.8 
Net deferred tax asset / (liability) positions$(11.4)$13.8 
As of each reporting date, management considers the weight of all evidence, both positive and negative, to determine if a valuation allowance is necessary for each jurisdiction's deferred tax assets. We place greater weight on historical evidence over future predictions of our ability to utilize deferred tax assets. We consider future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences, and taxable income in prior carryback year(s) if carryback is permitted under applicable law, as well as available prudent and feasible tax planning strategies that would, if necessary, be implemented to ensure realization of the net deferred tax assets.
Valuation allowance202120202019
(In millions)
As of January 1,$42.7 $41.9 $39.3 
   Additions for Tax Credits3.5 — 3.2 
   Additions for Loss carryforwards— 1.8 — 
   Additions for Interest carryforwards— 1.3 0.9 
   Additions Other0.4 0.2 — 
   Reduction for Tax Credits— (2.5)(1.0)
   Reduction for Loss carryforwards(1.8)— (0.4)
   Reductions for Interest carryforwards(8.5)— (0.1)
As of December 31,$36.3 $42.7 $41.9 

Deferred tax liabilitiesDecember 31
20192018
(In thousands)
Assets
   Intangible assets$3,673  $12,973  
   Property, plant and equipment33,040  30,628  
   Financial assets7,649  6,719  
   Receivables, other assets11,883  12,157  
Liabilities
   Provisions8,203  6,441  
   Liabilities12,568  3,953  
Other14,039  8,005  
Total deferred tax liabilities$91,057  $80,876  
The following table illustrates the gross and net deferred tax positions after the application of jurisdictional netting.
Net deferred tax positionDecember 31
20192018
(In thousands)
Deferred tax assets
Gross deferred tax assets$96,468  $87,766  
Net deferred tax assets48,720  52,395  
Deferred tax liabilities
Gross deferred tax liabilities91,057  80,876  
Net deferred tax liabilities43,308  45,504  
Net deferred tax asset / (liability) positions$5,412  $6,891  
86
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
65


Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Management assessesThe favorable changes in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets and for losses with recognition of deferred taxes for the recoverabilityyear ended December 31, 2021, is related to the positive judgment on the realization of deferred tax assets. The assessment dependsreduction in the interest carryforward is driven by anticipated positive income of the appropriate nature. A negative judgment on future taxable profits being generated during the periods in whichvaluation allowance related to tax measurement differences reverse and tax loss carryforwards can be claimed. Orion expects that sufficient taxable income will be available to recover deferred tax assets due tocredits was recorded or the tax group in place.
As ofyear ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, certain loss carryforwards were subject to restrictions with respect to the offsetting of losses. No deferred tax assets were recorded on these loss carryforwards if it is not likely that they will be used by future taxable income.
The following tax loss and interest carryforwards were recognized as at December 31, 2019 and 2018 (gross amounts):
December 31
20192018
(In thousands)
Corporate income tax loss carryforwards$41,334  $71,904  
Interest carryforwards for tax purposes31,463  28,562  
Total$72,797  $100,466  
The change between the recognized tax loss and interest carryforwards as at December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 is mainly driven by the taxable income of our German Tax Group.
No deferred tax assets were recognized for the following items (gross amounts):
December 31
20192018
(In thousands)
Deductible temporary differences$41,994  $40,905  
Corporate income tax loss carryforwards107,110  105,287  
Interest carryforwards for tax purposes31,463  28,562  
Total$180,567  $174,754  
2021.
The following table provides detail surrounding the expiration dates of the gross amount of tax loss carryforwards and tax credits:
Net operating loss carryforwardsTax Credits
(In thousands)
2020 to 2026$—  $—  
2027 and thereafter31,207  3,164  
Indefinite carryforwards75,903  21  
Total$107,110  $3,185  

December 31
Net operating loss carryforwardsTax Credits
(In millions)
2022 to 2028$— $— 
2029 and thereafter50.1 — 
Indefinite carryforwards139.2 8.4 
Total$189.3 $8.4 
We continue to make an assertion to indefinitely reinvest the unrepatriated earnings of most of our foreign subsidiaries that would incur incremental tax consequences upon the distribution of such earnings. As of December 31, 2019, the company's net operating loss carryforwards primarily relate to net operating losses which are due to expire at various dates, but2021, we did not later than 2036.
Noprovide for deferred taxes on earnings of most of our foreign subsidiaries that are indefinitely reinvested. If we were recognizedto make a distribution from the unremitted earnings of these subsidiaries, we could be subject to taxes in various jurisdictions. However, it is not practical to estimate the amount of tax that could ultimately be due if such earnings were remitted. If our expectations were to change regarding future tax consequences, we may be required to record additional deferred taxes that could have a material effect on a taxable temporary difference of $14.8 million (prior years: 2018: $11.8 million, 2017: $17.8 million) in connection with subsidiaries.
our consolidated financial statements. Deferred tax liabilities amounting $1.7$0.7 million, (2018: $1.8(2020: $0.8 million, 2017: $2.22019: $1.7 million) were recognized for subsidiaries for which a dividend distribution is expectedexpected.
Tax uncertainties
The following table summarizes the activity in the near future.unrecognized tax benefits:
Deferred tax liabilities in the USA were reduced by $8.8 million, deferred tax assets were reduced by $0.4 million mainly reflecting the changes following the U.S. tax reform and the future corporate tax rate of 21.0% for the year ended December 31, 2017.
We are not aware about events which would cause temporary differences, for which a deferred tax liability has not been recognized.
202120202019
(In millions)
Balance at beginning of the year$13.0 $11.6 $14.8 
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year0.3 0.1 0.2 
Additions for tax positions of prior year— 1.3 — 
Reductions of tax positions of prior year(1.2)— (3.4)
Balance at end of the year$12.1 $13.0 $11.6 

87



Tax uncertainties
A reconciliationWe recognize interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. Income tax expense includes a benefit of the beginninginterest and ending amountpenalties of $0.7 million in 2021 and an expense of interest and penalties totaling $1.1 million and $0.5 million in 2020 and 2019, respectively. We had accrued $4.4 million, $5.1 million and $4.0 million for interest and penalties as of December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The majority of the unrecognized tax benefits for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:
201920182017
(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of the year$14,771  $13,155  $10,660  
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year246   1,590  
Additions for tax positions of prior year—  2,982  1,663  
Reductions of tax positions of prior year(3,401) (1,370) (759) 
Reductions related to settlements—  —  —  
Reductions from lapse of statute of limitations—  —  —  
Balance at end of the year$11,616  $14,771  $13,155  
We recognize interest related to unrecognized tax benefits and penalties asrespectively would affect our effective income tax expense. During 2019 we accrued penalties of 0 and interest of $0.5 million to the unrecognized tax benefits (noted above). As of December 31, 2019 we have a total of $4.0 million of accrued penalties and interest. We recognized 0 liabilities for penalties and accrued interest of $0.5 million during 2018 and had a total accrual of $3.4 million as of December 31, 2018 for penalties and interest while we recognized 0 liabilities for penalties and accrued interest of $0.9 million during 2017. Accrued penalties and interest totaled $2.9 million as of December 31, 2017.rate.
Orion and certain subsidiaries are under audit in a number ofseveral jurisdictions, and in particular in Germany for periods 2011-2017. During the initial three years of incorporation (fiscal years 2011-2013). It cannot be excludedyear ending December 31, 2022, it is reasonably possible that a further change in theour existing liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits may occur within the next twelve months relatedincrease or decrease, primarily due to the settlementprogression of one or moreopen audits and the expiration of these audits or the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations; however, an estimatedlimitation. However, we cannot reasonably estimate a range of the impact on thepotential changes in our existing liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits cannot be quantified at this time.due to various uncertainties, such as the unresolved nature of various audits.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg66

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Note R.Q. Commitments and Contingencies
Other Long-Term Commitments
To safeguard the supply of raw materials, contractual purchase commitments under long-term supply agreements for raw materials, primarily oil and gas, are in place withare as follows:
MaturityDecember 31, 2021
(In millions)
2022$128.4 
20233.3 
20243.3 
20253.3 
20263.3 
2027 and thereafter22.8 
Total$164.4 
Restructuring—In 2016, the following maturities:Company ceased operations at its plant in Ambes, France as part of the restructuring of its Rubber business segment. Expenses related to the closing include personnel costs, demolition, removal costs and remediation costs. Total estimated and recognized costs and total costs remaining as of December 31, 2021 are $44.6 million and $9.3 million, respectively. Orion's reserves for restructuring of its Rubber segment in 2021 are reflected in Accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Orion has accrued liabilities for personnel expenses of $2.6 million and $3.5 million, and ground remediation costs of $6.7 million and $4.3 million, as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 respectively.
MaturityDecember 31, 2019
(In thousands)
2020$137,190  
2021 to 2024204,997  
2025 and thereafter—  
Total$342,188  
In the periods ending December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 restructuring expense, net including Ambes amounted to $2.2 million, $7.5 million, and $3.6 million, respectively.
Environmental MattersReserves—Our accrued liability for future environmental reserves at our current and former plant sites and other sites totaled $7.8 million and $1.7 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. During the fourth quarter of 2021, we recognized an additional reserve of $7.2 million reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in the Other expense, net. The environmental-related costs are expected to occur over a number of years and not concentrated in any single year. In our opinion, it is reasonably possible that losses in excess of the liabilities recorded may have been incurred. However, we cannot estimate any amount or range of such possible additional losses. New information about sites, new technology or future developments such as involvement in investigations by regulatory agencies, could require us to reassess our potential exposure related to environmental matters.
Legal Proceedings—We are subject to various lawsuits and claims, including but not limited to, matters involving contract disputes, environmental damages, personal injury and property damage. We vigorously defend ourselves and prosecute these matters as appropriate. We regularly assess the adequacy of legal accruals based on our professional judgment, experience and the information available regarding our cases.
Based on a consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances, we do not believe the ultimate outcome of any currently pending lawsuit against us will not have a material adverse effect upon our operations, financial condition or Consolidated Financial Statements.
EPA Action
Action—During 2008 and 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) contacted all U.S. carbon black producers as part of an industry-wide EPA initiative, requesting extensive and comprehensive information under Section 114 of the U.S. Clean Air Act. The EPA used that information to determine, for each facility, that either: (i) the facility has been in compliance with the Clean Air Act; (ii) violations have occurred and enforcement litigation may be undertaken; or (iii) violations have occurred and a settlement of an enforcement case is appropriate. In response to information requests received by the Company’s U.S. facilities, the Company furnished information to the EPA on each of its U.S. facilities. The EPA subsequently sent notices under Section 113(a) of the Clean Air Act in 2010 alleging violations of Prevention of Significant Deterioration (“PSD”) and Title V permitting requirements under the Clean Air Act at the Company’s Belpre (Ohio) facility. In October 2012, the Company received a corresponding notice and finding of violation (a “NOV”) alleging the failure to obtain PSD and Title V permits reflecting Best Available Control Technology (“BACT”) at several units of the Company’s Ivanhoe (Louisiana) facility, and in January 2013 the Company also received a NOV issued by the EPA for its facility in Borger (Texas) alleging the failure to obtain PSD and Title V permits reflecting BACT during the years 1996 to 2008. A comparable NOV for the Company’s U.S. facility in Orange (Texas) was issued by the EPA in February 2013; and EPA issued an additional NOV in March 2016 alleging more recent non-PSD air emissions violations primarily at the dryers and the incinerator of the Orange facility.
In 2013, Orion began discussions with the EPA and the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) about a potential settlement to resolve the NOVs received, which ultimately led to a consent decree executed between Orion Engineered Carbons LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (for purpose of this note Note Q.
88



“Orion” “Orion LLC”) and the United States (on behalf of the EPA), as well as the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality. The consent decree (the “EPA CD”) became effective on June 7, 2018. The consent decreeEPA CD resolves and settles the EPA’s claims of noncompliance set forth in the NOVs described above and in a respective complaint filed in court against Orion by the United States immediately prior to the filing of the consent decree.
All 5 U.S. carbon black producers have settled with
oec-20211231_g1.jpg67

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the U.S. government.Consolidated Financial Statements
Under Orion’sOrion LLC’s EPA CD, Orion willLLC is required to install certain pollution control technology in order to further reduce emissions at its 4 U.S. manufacturing facilities in Ivanhoe (Louisiana), Belpre (Ohio), Borger (Texas), and Orange (Texas) over approximately sixfive years. The EPA CD also requires the continuous monitoring of emissions reductions that Orion LLC will need to comply with over a number of years. Orion has commenced the installation works for its Ivanhoe facility, and expects to complete the installation in this facility over the next one year. UnderIn addition, the EPA CD required Orion can choose either its Belpre or Borger facilities as the next site for installation of pollution control equipment with comparable effectiveness. We expect the capital expenditures for installation of pollution control equipment in the remaining Orion facilitiesLLC to decrease due to economies of scale and synergies from prior installations. We also expect that the third and fourth plants will require significantly less costly pollution control equipment given the requirements of the EPA CD. We estimate the installations of monitoring and pollution control equipment at all 4 Orion plants in the U.S. will require capital expenditures of approximately $190.0 million, subject to the results of further scope design and estimation efforts presently underway. However, the actual total capital expenditures we might need to incur in order to fulfill the requirements of the EPA CD remain uncertain. The EPA CD allows some flexibility for Orion to choose among different technology solutions for reducing emissions and the locations where these solutions are implemented. The solutions Orion ultimately chooses to implement at its facilities other than Ivanhoe (Louisiana), may differ in scope and operation from those it currently anticipates (including those discussed in the next paragraph) and, for any and all of its four facilities, factors, such as timing, locations, target levels, changing cost estimates and local regulations, could cause actual capital expenditures to significantly exceed current expectations or affect Orion’s ability to meet the agreed target emission levels or target dates for installing required equipment as anticipated or at all. Orion also agreed to and paidpay a civil penaltyfine of $0.8 million and agreed to perform other environmental mitigation projects totaling $0.6 million. Noncompliance with applicable emissions limits could leadthat are not anticipated to further penalty payments to the EPA.
be material. As part of Orion’s compliance plan under the EPA CD, in April 2018 Orion signed a contract with Haldor Topsoe group to install its SNOXTM emissions control technology to remove SO2,SO2, NOx and dust particles from tail gases at Orion’sOrion LLC’s Ivanhoe, Louisiana Carbon Black production plant. The SNOXTM technology has notIn 2021, the construction projects at the Ivanhoe (Louisiana) and Orange (Texas) facilities have been used previously incompleted. Under the carbon black industry.EPA CD, Orion LLC can choose either its Belpre or Borger facilities as the next site for installation of pollution control equipment with comparable effectiveness.
Orion’sAs of December 31, 2021, we have spent $210 million of capital expenditures related to the EPA CD.
The Company’s Share Purchase Agreement with Evonik Industries AG, Germany, Evonik Degussa GmbH, Germany and any affiliated companies (“Evonik”) in connection with the Acquisition providesacquisition of the carbon black business line from Evonik, completed on July 29, 2011 (the “Acquisition”), provided for a partial indemnity from Evonik against various exposures, including, but not limited to, capital investments, fines and costs arising in connection with Clean Air Act violations that occurred prior to July 29, 2011. Except for certain less relevant allegations contained in the second NOV received for the Company’s facility in Orange (Texas) in March 2016, all of the other allegations made by the EPA with regard to all 4 of the Company’s U.S. facilities - as discussed above - relate to alleged violations before July 29, 2011. The indemnity provides for a recovery from Evonik of a share of the costs (including fines), expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees, but excluding costs for maintenance and control in the ordinary course of business and any internal cost of monitoring the remedy), liabilities, damages and losses suffered and is subject to various contractual provisions including provisions set forth in the Share Purchase Agreement with Evonik, such as a de minimis clause, a basket, overall caps (which apply to all covered exposures and all covered environmental exposures, in the aggregate), damage mitigation and cooperation requirements, as well as a statute of limitations provision. Due to the cost-sharing and cap provisions in Evonik’s indemnity, the Company expects that substantial costs it has already incurred and will incur in this EPA enforcement initiative and the EPA CD likely will exceed the scope of the indemnity in the tens of millions of US dollars. In addition, Evonik signaled that it is not honoring Orion’s claims under the indemnity. In June 2019, Orion initiated arbitration proceedings to enforce its rights against Evonik. In June 2021, Orion and Evonik in turn has submittedagreed to settle all claims made under this partial indemnity as well as certain other claims and counterclaims relatedOrion and Evonik asserted against each other. Evonik made a one-time cash payment of €66.55 million ($79.5 million) to a tax indemnity and cost reimbursement against Orion which resolved all pending claims as well as counterclaims we do not believe to be material. Althoughof $3.4 million. In the Consolidated Financial Statements, Orion believes that it is entitled to the indemnity and that its rights thereunder are enforceable, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to recover costs or expenditures incurred under the indemnity as it expects or at all.recorded a gain aggregating $82.9 million.
Pledges and guarantees
The pledge servesCompany has pledged the majority of its assets (amongst others shares in affiliates, bank accounts and receivables) within the different regions excluding China as collateral for claims arising under the finance documents, including the credit agreement dated July 25, 2014 as amended from time to time. The current principal amounts of the outstanding term loans under the Credit Agreement are $281.3 million (U.S. Dollar Term Loan), and €361.8 million (Euro Term Loan).
Agreement. As atof December 31, 2019 Orion Engineered Carbons GmbH has 32021, the Company had guarantees totaling $15.8 million issued by Euler Hermes S.A. with a total volume of $9.2 million (in prior year 4 guarantees by Euler Hermes S.A. of $15.2 million); 1 guarantee insurance issued by Deutsche Bank AG with a volume of $2.2 million (prior year 1 guarantee issued by Deutsche Bank AG with a volume of $2.9 million). None of these guarantees reduce the possible utilization limit of the current RCF.various financial institutions.
89



Note S.R. Segment Financial Information by Segment & Geographic Area
Segment information
The Company’sWe disclose the results of each of our operating segments in accordance with ASC 280, Segment Reporting. We manage our business is organized by itsin 2 carbon black product types. For corporate management purposes and all periods presented the Company had Rubber Carbon Black and Specialty Carbon Blackoperating segments as reportable operating segments. follows:
Rubber carbon black is used—Used in the reinforcement of rubber in tires and mechanical rubber goods, goods.
Specialties are used—Used as pigments and performance additives in coatings, polymers, printing and special applications.
The following table shows the relative size of the revenue recognized in each of the Company’s reportable segment:
201920182017
Rubber  66 %65 %64 %
Specialty  34 %35 %36 %
The senior management team, which is composed of the CEO, CFO and certain other senior management members is the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”). The senior management team monitors the operating segments’ results separately in order to facilitate decisions regarding the allocation of resources and determine the segments’ performance. Orion uses Adjusted EBITDA as the segments' performance measure. The CODM does not review reportable segment asset or liability information for purposes of assessing performance or allocating resources.
Adjustment items are not allocated to the individual segments as they are managed on a group basis.
90

Corporate


Segment reconciliation for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
RubberSpecialtiesCorporate and otherTotal segments
(In thousands) 
2019
Net sales from external customers$967,899  $508,454  $—  $1,476,353  
Adjusted EBITDA$145,170  $122,167  $—  $267,337  
Corporate charges—  —  (22,916) (22,916) 
Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment(58,645) (38,067) —  (96,713) 
Excluding equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax(558) —  —  (558) 
Income from operations before income tax expense and finance costs85,967  84,100  (22,916) 147,151  
Interest and other financial expense, net—  —  (27,572) (27,572) 
Income tax expense—  —  (33,216) (33,216) 
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax558  —  —  558  
Net income$86,920  
Assets$696,516  $417,834  $143,043  $1,257,394  
Total expenditures for additions to long-lived assets$132,556  $26,147  $—  $158,703  
2018
Net sales from external customers$1,032,818  $545,385  $—  $1,578,203  
Adjusted EBITDA$144,887  $149,255  $—  $294,142  
Corporate charges—  —  910  910  
Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment(57,127) (41,029) —  (98,156) 
Excluding equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax(591) —  —  (591) 
Income from operations before income tax expense and finance costs87,169  108,226  910  196,305  
Interest and other financial expense, net—  —  (28,642) (28,642) 
Income tax expense—  —  (46,944) (46,944) 
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax591  —  —  591  
Net income$121,310  
Assets$685,243  $436,337  $151,442  $1,273,022  
Total expenditures for additions to long-lived assets$67,885  $43,171  $—  $111,057  
2017
Net sales from external customers$849,410  $478,887  $—  $1,328,297  
Adjusted EBITDA$111,490  $145,488  $—  $256,978  
Corporate charges—  —  (20,204) (20,204) 
Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment(60,403) (37,953) —  (98,356) 
Excluding equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax(547) —  —  (547) 
Income from operations before income tax expense and finance costs50,540  107,535  (20,204) 137,871  
Interest and other financial expense, net—  —  (44,135) (44,135) 
Reclassification of actuarial losses from AOCI—  —  (9,687) (9,687) 
Income tax expense—  —  (19,736) (19,736) 
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax547  —  —  547  
Net income$64,860  
Assets$610,782  $357,492  $196,092  $1,164,366  
Total expenditures for additions to long-lived assets$52,584  $46,397  $—  $98,981  
The sales information noted above relates to external customers only. ‘Corporate and other’ includes income and expense that cannot be directly allocated to the business segments or are managed on corporate level and includes finance income and expenses, taxes and items with less bearing on the underlying core business.

Discrete financial information is available for each of the segments, and the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) uses operating results of each operating segments for performance evaluation and resource allocation.
Our CODM uses Adjusted EBITDA as the primary measure for reviewing our segment profitability. We define Adjusted EBITDA as income from operations before depreciation and amortization, restructuring expenses, consulting fees related to Company strategy, gain related to legal settlement, and includes equity earnings (loss) in affiliated companies, net of tax.
The CODM does not review reportable segment asset or liability information for purposes of assessing performance or allocating resources.

91
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
68


Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Segment operating results are as follows:
RubberSpecialtiesCorporateTotal
(In millions)
2021
Net sales from external customers$948.6 $598.2 $ $1,546.8 
Adjusted EBITDA120.0 148.4  268.4 
Corporate charges— — (18.0)(18.0)
Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets, right of use assets, and property, plant and equipment(59.0)(45.1)— (104.1)
Gain related to litigation settlement— — 82.9 82.9 
Excluding equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax(0.7)— — (0.7)
Interest and other financial expense, net— — (38.0)(38.0)
Reclassification of actuarial losses from AOCI— — (4.8)(4.8)
Income before earnings in affiliated companies and income taxes$185.7 
Assets912.2 582.1 136.7 $1,631.0 
Capital expenditures149.1 65.6 — 214.7 
2020
Net sales from external customers$691.2 $445.2 $ $1,136.4 
Adjusted EBITDA90.0 110.0  200.0 
Corporate charges— — (28.5)(28.5)
Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets, right of use assets, and property, plant and equipment(57.0)(39.6)— (96.6)
Excluding equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax(0.5)— — (0.5)
Interest and other financial expense, net— — (38.7)(38.7)
Reclassification of actuarial losses from AOCI— — (9.9)(9.9)
Income before earnings in affiliated companies and income taxes$25.8 
Assets789.3 467.0 133.5 $1,389.8 
Capital expenditures111.5 27.3 — 138.8 
2019
Net sales from external customers$967.9 $508.5 $ $1,476.4 
Adjusted EBITDA145.2 122.2  267.4 
Corporate charges— — (22.9)(22.9)
Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets, right of use assets, and property, plant and equipment(58.6)(38.1)— (96.7)
Excluding equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax(0.6)— — (0.6)
Interest and other financial expense, net— — (27.6)(27.6)
Income before earnings in affiliated companies and income taxes$119.6 
Assets696.5 417.8 143.1 $1,257.4 
Capital expenditures132.6 26.1 — 158.7 
Income from operations before income taxes and finance costs of the segment 'Corporate and other'‘Corporate’ comprises the following:
201920182017202120202019
(In thousands) (In millions)
Restructuring expenses/(income)$3,628  $(24,633) $6,492  
Consulting fees related to Company strategyConsulting fees related to Company strategy3,005  4,804  2,807  Consulting fees related to Company strategy$— $— $1.3 
Extraordinary expense items related to COVID-19Extraordinary expense items related to COVID-19— 3.9 — 
Long Term Incentive PlanLong Term Incentive Plan9,438  13,919  8,835  Long Term Incentive Plan5.2 4.4 9.4 
EPA-related expensesEPA-related expenses2.3 5.2 4.0 
Environmental reserve accrualEnvironmental reserve accrual7.2 — — 
Other non-operatingOther non-operating6,844  5,000  2,070  Other non-operating3.3 15.0 8.2 
Expenses/(income) from operations before income taxes and finance costsExpenses/(income) from operations before income taxes and finance costs$22,916  $(910) $20,204  Expenses/(income) from operations before income taxes and finance costs$18.0 $28.5 $22.9 

oec-20211231_g1.jpg69

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Geographic informationinformation:
Net salesNet salesYears Ended December 31,Net salesYears Ended December 31,
201920182017Net sales202120202019
(In thousands) Net sales(In millions)
GermanyGermany$593,769  $628,709  $524,065  Germany$$486.5 $
United StatesUnited States394,349  401,935  330,424  United States405.1 289.5 394.3 
South KoreaSouth Korea241,235  279,016  246,551  South Korea208.9 173.5 241.2 
BrazilBrazil94,541  95,611  80,143  Brazil100.1 64.8 94.5 
ChinaChina63,149  75,638  64,645  China92.7 60.1 63.1 
South AfricaSouth Africa54,746  56,373  46,844  South Africa53.3 34.0 54.7 
OtherOther23,601  24,293  23,129  Other24.9 19.5 23.8 
Rest of Europe (1)
Rest of Europe (1)
10,964  16,628  12,496  
Rest of Europe (1)
13.2 8.5 11.0 
TotalTotal$1,476,353  $1,578,203  $1,328,297  Total$1,546.8 $1,136.4 $1,476.4 
(1) Only a holding company is located in Luxembourg, accordingly no revenue is generated in the country of domicile.
Revenue generatedFor the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, 1 customer accounted for 10% or more revenue in the Rubber segment and amounted to $218.6 million and $170.3 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2019, from the largest customer2 customers accounted for 10% or more of revenue in the “Rubber”Rubber segment amounted to $195.6totaling $299.7 million. Revenue
In 2021, revenue from the largest customertop ten customers, in the “Rubber”Rubber segment, for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $201.7 million and for the year ended December 31, 2017approximately $590.9 million.
In 2021, revenue from the largest customertop ten customers, in the “Rubber”Specialties segment, was $144.4 million, respectively. There is each another customer with more than, or equal to 10% of revenue for the period 2019 and 2018.approximately $148.7 million.
Long-lived tangible assets(1)
Long-lived tangible assets(1)
December 31
Long-lived tangible assets(1)
December 31
20192018
Long-lived tangible assets(1)
20212020
(In thousands)
Long-lived tangible assets(1)
(In millions)
GermanyGermany$81,388  $104,823  Germany$$
SwedenSweden26,41926,351Sweden23.927.9
ItalyItaly43,54729,586Italy70.860.5
PolandPoland12,14812,964Poland12.812.9
Rest of Europe (2)
Rest of Europe (2)
6,1795,815
Rest of Europe (2)
21.910.7
Subtotal EuropeSubtotal Europe169,681179,539Subtotal Europe278.9259.9
United StatesUnited States220,200139,929United States319.6258.2
South KoreaSouth Korea112,303115,036South Korea109.1120.6
South AfricaSouth Africa15,98316,894South Africa15.113.1
BrazilBrazil23,66221,395Brazil15.417.2
ChinaChina19,65510,719China53.227.0
OtherOther10022Other1.20.1
TotalTotal$561,585  $483,534  Total$792.5 $696.1 
(1) Long-lived assets include property.property, plant and equipment, net and right-of-use assets, net.
(2) Only a holding company is located in Luxembourg, accordingly no revenue is generated in the country of domicile.
92
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
70


Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Note T.S. Related Parties    
As of December 31, 20192021, related parties includeprimarily includes 1 associate ofjoint venture Orion that is accounted for using the equity method, namely "Deutsche“Deutsche Gaßrußwerke"werke” (DGW) and 1 principal owner of more than 10%.
Related parties include key management personnel having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and monitoring the activities of the Company directly or indirectly and their close family members.
In the normal course of business Orion from time to time receives services from, or sells products to, related unconsolidated parties, in transactions that are either not material or approved in accordance with our Related Party Transaction Approval Policy.
December 31,
20192018
(In thousands)
Trade receivables from DGW KG$537  $651  
Trade payables to DGW KG$17,671  $18,615  
December 31,
20212020
(In millions)
Trade receivables$0.6 $— 
Trade payables24.9 11.8 
Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
(In millions)
Purchases$113.2 $68.8 $89.4 
Sales and services5.7 1.6 2.7 
Note T. Subsequent Events
On October 29, 2021, the Company’s Board of Directors declared interim dividends in the aggregate amount of $1.25 million, which is equivalent to approximately $0.02 per common stock of the company. The interim dividend was paid on January 12, 2022, to holders of record as of the close of business on January 5, 2022.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg71

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31,
201920182017
(In thousands) 
Purchased carbon black products from DGW KG  $89,404  $93,536  $79,270  
Sales and services provided to DGW KG  $2,724  $6,464  $2,627  

Note U. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
Unaudited financial results by quarter for fiscal 2019 and 2018 are summarized below:
Quarters EndedYear Ended
March 31, 2019June 30, 2019September 30, 2019December 31, 2019December 31, 2019
(In thousands, except per share amounts) 
Net sales$384,714  $399,016  $370,195  $322,428  $1,476,353  
Gross profit$97,969  $104,038  $98,714  $88,987  $389,708  
Income from operations$34,699  $41,470  $38,386  $32,596  $147,151  
Income from operations before income tax expense and equity in earnings of affiliated companies$28,256  $33,904  $31,886  $25,533  $119,579  
Net income$18,954  $24,748  $24,253  $18,965  $86,920  
Earnings per Share (USD per share), basic$0.32  $0.41  $0.40  $0.32  $1.45  
Earnings per Share (USD per share), diluted$0.32  $0.40  $0.39  $0.31  $1.42  


93



Quarters EndedYear Ended
March 31, 2018June 30, 2018September 30, 2018December 31, 2018December 31, 2018
(In thousands, except per share amounts) 
Net sales$406,699  $391,586  $393,954  $385,964  $1,578,203  
Gross profit$112,403  $112,773  $109,156  $95,639  $429,971  
Income from operations$45,333  $82,457  $41,843  $26,672  $196,305  
Income from operations before income tax expense and equity in earnings of affiliated companies$36,951  $73,680  $35,653  $21,379  $167,663  
Net income$26,754  $53,081  $25,817  $15,658  $121,310  
Earnings per Share (USD per share), basic$0.45  $0.89  $0.43  $0.27  $2.04  
Earnings per Share (USD per share), diluted$0.44  $0.87  $0.43  $0.25  $1.99  

Note V. Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated events from December 31, 2019 through the date the financial statements were issued. There were no subsequent events that need disclosure.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation wasAs of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Interim Chief Financial Officer (CFO(“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as of December 31, 2019.1934. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and the CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that material information that is required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.disclosure as of December 31, 2021.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of the Company’s financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements or omissions. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management conducted its assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20192021 based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on that assessment and discussion with the Company's Audit Committee, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2019,2021, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
AttestationAudit Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young, GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, has issued an attestationaudit report on management’s internal control over financial reporting which appears below.



Changes in Control over Financial Reporting
No change in internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) occurred during the year ended December 31, 20192021 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

95
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
72


Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

TheTo the Shareholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Orion Engineered Carbons S.A.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Orion Engineered Carbons S.A.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Orion Engineered Carbons S.A. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2021, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the 2019 consolidated financialbalance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the Company,year ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes and our report dated February 20, 202017, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/Tobias Schlebusch /s/Titus Zwirner
WirtschaftsprüferWirtschaftsprüfer
(German Public Auditor)(German Public Auditor)

/s/ Ernst & Young GmbH WirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaftLLP
Cologne, GermanyHouston, TX
February 20, 2020

17, 2022
96
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
73

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A

Item 9B. Other Information
None
oec-20211231_g1.jpg74

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The Directors and certain Governance information required by this item will be included in our Proxy Statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“Proxy Statement”) and is herein incorporated by reference.
The Company is overseen by a board of directors (conseil d’administration) (the “Board of Directors”), composed of eight members.
NameAgeYears in OfficeTitle
Dan F. Smith735Chairman of the Board
Corning F. Painter571Director and Chief Executive Officer
Jack L. Clem661Director
Marc Jean Pierre Faber612Director
Paul Huck705Director
Kerry A. Galvin591Director
Didier Miraton615Director
Hans-Dietrich Winkhaus825Director
The following is a brief summary of the business experience of the directors.
Dan F. Smith. Mr. Smith serves as chairman of the board of Kraton Corp., He is also a director of Nexeo Solutions, Inc. and, since May 2017, TPG Pace Energy Holdings Corp. During the past five years, Mr. Smith served on the board of directors of Cooper Industries plc. He began his career with ARCO (Atlantic Richfield Company) in 1968 as an engineer. He was elected president of Lyondell Chemical Company in August 1994, chief executive officer in December 1996 and chairman of the board of directors in May 2007. Mr. Smith retired in December 2007 as chairman, president and chief executive officer of Lyondell Chemical Company following the acquisition of Lyondell by Basell. Mr. Smith also serves as a member of the College of Engineering Advisory Council at Lamar University. Mr. Smith is a graduate of Lamar University with a B.S. degree in chemical engineering.
Corning F. Painter. Mr. Painter began his career at Air Products in 1984 as part of the company’s career development program. He rose through the ranks, progressing through a variety of commercial and operations positions in the U.S. and overseas, and was rapidly promoted several times over the last several years, holding leadership positions in operations, supply chain, corporate strategy and technology. He held the position of Executive Vice President, Industrial Gases until he left Air Products at the end of June, 2018 to become Orion Engineered Carbons group’s Chief Executive Officer starting from September 2018.
Jack L. Clem. Mr. Clem has been the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Orion Engineered Carbons Group between July 2011 and September 2018 and manager of the Company since May 2014 and had been the head of Evonik Degussa GmbH`s global Carbon Black business since August 2009. He joined Degussa in 2001 and shortly after was named CEO of their joint venture in Carbon Black with a U.S.-based private equity firm. He has over 35 years of experience in the performance and specialty minerals and chemicals industry. Prior to joining Degussa, he held various senior management positions in North America and Europe at J.M. Huber Corporation and started his career in engineering and plant management at Occidental Chemical Corporation.
Marc Jean Pierre Faber. Mr. Faber has been a daily manager of the Company since 2014. Mr. Faber holds various directorship positions, amongst others at AXA Real Estate Investments Corporation. Between 2003 and 2010, Mr. Faber served as chief executive officer of BIP Investment Partners S.A. Previously, he was the Chief Financial Officer of Cerametal Sarl, Luxembourg between 2001 and 2002, after various other functions within that company since 1991. Mr. Faber holds an MBA from INSEAD (Fontainbleau, France) and a civil engineer degree from the University of Liege, Belgium.
Paul Huck. Mr. Huck previously served for nine years as the chief financial officer and senior vice president of Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., a global $10 billion industrial gas and chemical company. Prior to this he served for ten years at Air Products and Chemicals as a vice president and corporate controller. He served as a director of NewPage Corporation and as a member of NewPage’s audit committee from 2012 until its sale in 2015. He also is a director of AdvanSix Inc. since 2016. In addition, he serves on the boards of
97



numerous charities. Mr. Huck holds a B.S. in mathematics from the United States Naval Academy and an MBA from the Johnson Graduate School of Management at Cornell University.
Kerry A. Galvin. Ms. Galvin has been practicing law for 30 years, including 26 years as in-house counsel. She spent 18 years at Lyondell Chemical Co., a publicly traded chemical company in the Fortune 200, including the last eight years as General Counsel. Later she became General Counsel at Axip Energy Services LP, a privately held oil field services company, serving for more than five years until her retirement. She has been a board member of the American Corporate Counsel Association, the Alumni Association of The University of Michigan and The Georgetown University Board of Regents. Ms. Galvin earned a B.S. in Foreign Service from Georgetown University and a J.D from the University of Michigan.
Didier Miraton. Mr. Miraton is currently an adviser to several senior executives and a professor in the MBA program at the Collège des Ingénieurs (CDI) in Paris. He was the chief executive officer of Almérys SAS, a French information technology company operating in the health insurance data sphere, until late 2015. He is the former chief executive officer of the Laboratoires Pierre Fabre, a leading French pharmaceutical company. He also served as a managing partner of the Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA from May 11, 2007 to June 30, 2011. During his time at Michelin, Mr. Miraton also acted as president of Michelin’s worldwide Research & Technology group and was a member of the Michelin Group Executive Council. Mr. Miraton has been an independent director of Vilmorin Clause & Cie SA since November 2007. He holds a civil engineering degree from the École Nationale des Ponts-et-Chaussées.
Hans-Dietrich Winkhaus. Mr. Winkhaus previously served as chief executive officer of Henkel KGaA. He served also as Chairman of the Board of Deutsche Telekom AG and Schwarz Pharma AG. He was a board member at BMW AG, Lufthansa AG, ERGO AG, Degussa AG and Galeria Kaufhof AG. He is engaged in the CARE organization in Germany. Mr. Winkhaus studied Business Administration at and received a Ph.D. from Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich.
Senior ManagementOfficers
The following table sets forth certain information concerning our senior management:executive officers:
NameAgeTitle
Corning F. Painter5957Chief Executive Officer
Lorin CrenshawRobert Hrivnak6144Interim Chief Financial Officer
Lixing Min59Senior Vice President and General Manager–Asia Pacific Region
Sandra Niewiem4543Senior Vice President, Global Specialty Carbon Black and EMEA Region
Pedro Riveros5149Senior Vice President, Global Rubber Carbon Black and Americas Region
David DetersCarlos J. Quinones61Senior Vice President, Innovation
Sungdo Gong57Senior Vice President, Strategic DevelopmentGlobal Operations
André Schulze Isfort45Chief Accounting Officer, Head of Consolidation & Reporting
Corning F. Painter.Painter—Mr. Painter began his career at Air Products in 1984 as part of the company’s career development program. He rose through the ranks, progressing through a variety of commercial and operations positions in the U.S. and overseas, and was rapidly promoted several times over the last several years, holding leadership positions in operations, supply chain, corporate strategy and technology. He held the position of Executive Vice President, Industrial Gases until he left Air Products at the end of June, 2018 to become Orion Engineered Carbons group’s new Chief Executive Officer starting from September 2018.
Lorin Crenshaw. Robert Hrivnak—Mr. CrenshawHrivnak joined Orion in November 2019August 2020 and was appointed Interim Chief Financial Officer in October 2021. Mr. Hrivnak has over 2030 years of diversifiedexperience as an accomplished financial experience, including more than 10 years in senior leadership positions with global chemical companies. Immediately prior toexecutive. Mr. Hrivnak joined Orion from Clearwater Paper, a manufacturer of paper products, where he served as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer. Prior to Clearwater, he served as Chief Accounting Officer of Albemarle Corporation’sItron, Inc., a global lithiumpublic technology and services company providing products and services to utilities and municipalities. Mr. Hrivnak is a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) and holds a BS business and also earlier served in several key management roles including Treasurer and Head of Investor Relations while at Albemarle. Mr. Crenshaw also has over ten years of experience with investment management firms Citigroup Asset Management and Prudential Capital Group. Mr. Crenshaw holds an MBAaccounting from Columbia UniversityOhio State and a BS in Business Administration from Florida A&M University.
Lixing Min. Dr. Min has been our Senior Vice President and General Manager–Asia-Pacific Region since April 2013. He has over 23 years of experience in the chemical industry, including positions of general management of the Asia-Pacific region for both American- and German-based chemical companies. Dr. Min holds a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from Fudan University in China and master’s and doctoral degrees in chemistryMBA from the University of Rochester.Wisconsin.
Sandra Niewiem.Niewiem—Dr. Niewiem was appointed Senior Vice President Global Specialty Carbon Black and EMEA Region in September 2019. Dr. Niewiem joined Orion in December 2013 and previously held the position of Vice President Global Product Management and Business Development Specialty Carbon Black. She has over 19 years of experience in process industries, engineering
98



and industrial goods, thereof more than 13 years in management consulting at a global consulting firm. Dr. Niewiem holds an economics doctorate from European Business School and a master’s in business administration from James Madison University, Virginia.
Pedro RiverosRiveros—. Mr. Riveros joined Orion Engineered Carbons in the current role in June 2019. He has 25 years of experience in varied general management and business management roles in the industrial gas and chemicals area both in North and South America. Mr. Riveros held several business leadership roles at Air Products, prior to joining Orion, where his key areas of expertise included Business Strategy, Margin Enhancement, Productivity and Supply Chain Management. Mr. Riveros holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
David Deters.Carlos Quinones David Deters has beenMr. Quinones joined Engineered Orion Carbons in the Senior Vice President–Innovation and a member of the executive management team since August 2015. He has over 30 years of global experience within coatings, printing inks and specialty chemical sectors. Priorcurrent role in June 2019. Immediately prior to joining Orion, he held executive managementmultiple Operations leadership positions at Hempel as GVP R&DAir Products from 2015 to 2019. Prior to Air Products, Mr. Quinones held positions of increasing leadership responsibilities in the chemical industry experience with Praxair, Rohm and Marine MarketingHaas/Dow Chemical, and King Industries as VPGM Specialty Chemicals. He worked for 20 years at DuPont holding various Technical Director and Global Product Management positions throughout the world.Arco Chemical. Mr. DetersQuinones holds a Bachelor of Science Degreedegree in Mechanical Engineering from Michigan StateTexas A&M University.
Sungdo Gong. Mr. Gong joined Orion on March 2014, as Country Manager, Korea, and was promoted to his current position in May 2018. He has over twenty-seven years of professional experience. Immediately prior to Orion, he was with GE Healthcare and GE Energy in Korea where he held several leadership roles. His earlier career included service at Hyosung, BP, the Korean Ministry of Planning and Budget, the International Monetary Fund in the US and the law firms of Kim & Chang in Korea and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld in the US. Mr. Gong holds a Master of Laws (LL.M.) degree from Georgetown University Law Center in Washington, D.C., a juris doctorate from Pepperdine University Law of School, California, and a bachelor’s degree in international affairs from The George Washington University, Washington, D.C. He is a member (inactive) of the State Bar of California.
André Schulze Isfort. André Schulze Isfort has been HeadCode of Consolidation & Reporting since August 2011, also serving as Principal Accounting Officer. He has almost 10 yearsConduct/Code of experience in the chemical industry including as head of a restructuring project and as head of internal audit. Prior to joining the industry he worked for five years at Deloitte. Mr. Schulze Isfort holds a master’s degree in business administration from the University of Applied Science of Münster, Germany. 
Corporate GovernanceEthics
Orion has adopted a Code of EthicsConduct that applies to all of the Company’sCompany employees and directors, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, senior management, the Controller and other senior financial officers. The Code of Conduct is posted on our website, www.orioncarbons.com (under “Legal” then “Compliance Policies” section). In addition, the company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer. The Code of Ethics is posted on our website, www.orioncarbons.com (under “Investors” then “Governance” section). We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement regarding any amendment to, or waiver of, a provision of the Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics applicable to the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, senior management, the Controller or other senior financial officers by posting such information on our website.
The other information required by this item will be included in our Proxy Statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“Proxy Statement”) and is herein incorporated by reference. 
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item will be included in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg75

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information relating to security ownership of certain beneficial owners of our common stock and information relating to the security ownership of our management required by this item will be included in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this item will be included in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by this item will be included in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
oec-20211231_g1.jpg76

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a) Financial Statements.
See Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

99



(b) Schedules.
The Schedules have been omitted since the required information is not applicable or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Form 10-K.

(c) Exhibits. (Certain exhibits not included in copies of the Form 10-K sent to stockholders.)
The exhibit numbers in the Exhibit Index correspond to the numbers assigned to such exhibits in the Exhibit Table of Item 601 of Regulation S-K. Orion will furnish to any stockholder, upon written request, any exhibit listed in the Exhibit Index, upon payment by such stockholder of the Company’s reasonable expenses in furnishing such exhibit.
Item 16. 10-K Summary
None applicable.

Exhibit
Number
Description
3.1
4.1
4(b)
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
oec-20211231_g1.jpg77

Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
10.6
10.7
100



10.8
10.9
10.10
21.1
23.1
23.2
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101.0XBRL
104Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)

101
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
78


Orion Engineered Carbons S.A
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ORION ENGINEERED CARBONS S.A.
February 20, 202017, 2022By/s/ Corning F. Painter
Name: Corning F. Painter
Title: Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Corning F. PainterChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Corning F. PainterFebruary 20, 202017, 2022
/s/ Lorin CrenshawBob HrivnakInterim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Lorin CrenshawBob HrivnakFebruary 20, 202017, 2022
/s/ Andre Schulze IsfortChief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
Andre Schulze IsfortFebruary 20, 2020
/s/ Jack L. ClemDirector
Jack L. ClemFebruary 20, 2020
/s/ Marc Jean Pierre FaberDirector
Marc Jean Pierre FaberFebruary 20, 2020
/s/ Kerry A. GalvinDirector
Kerry A. GalvinFebruary 20, 202017, 2022
/s/ Paul HuckDirector
Paul HuckFebruary 20, 202017, 2022
/s/ Mary LindseyDirector
Mary LindseyFebruary 17, 2022
/s/ Didier MiratonDirector
Didier MiratonFebruary 20, 202017, 2022
/s/ Yi Hyon PaikDirector
Yi Hyon PaikFebruary 17, 2022
/s/ Dan F. SmithDirector
Dan F. SmithFebruary 20, 202017, 2022
/s/ Hans Dietrich WinkhausDirector
Hans Dietrich WinkhausFebruary 20, 202017, 2022
/s/ Michel WurthDirector
Michel WurthFebruary 17, 2022

102
oec-20211231_g1.jpg
79