UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

☒  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172019

 

or

 

☐  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________________ to ____________________

 

Commission file number:001-38029

  

 

 

AKOUSTIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

  

Delaware33-1229046
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
  
9805 Northcross Center Court, Suite HA 
Huntersville, NC28078
(Address of principal executive offices)(Postal Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  1-704-997-5735

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  1-704-997-5735

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:

  

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value

Trading SymbolName of each exchange on which registered:
Common Stock, $0.001 par valueAKTSThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

(NASDAQ (NASDAQ Capital Market)

 

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  ☐  No  ☒

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  Yes  ☐  No  ☒

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  ☒  No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  ☒  No  ☐

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large Accelerated Filer ☐Accelerated Filer  
Non-Accelerated Filer ☐Smaller reporting company ☒
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Emerging growth company 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  ☐  No  ☒

 

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”), held by non-affiliates on December 31, 20162018 was approximately $52,512,000.$123.6 million. For purposes of this computation, shares of Common Stock held by all officers, directors, and beneficial owners of 10% or more of the outstanding Common Stock were excluded because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates of the registrant. Such determination should not be deemed an admission that such persons are, in fact, affiliates of the registrant.

 

As of September 8, 2017,06, 2019, there were 19,084,58330,329,525 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

None.The registrant intends to file a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019. Portions of such proxy statement are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

 

 

  

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Item Number and CaptionItem Number and Caption PageItem Number and Caption Page
        
Explanatory Note 1
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking InformationCautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information 1Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information ii
      
PART IPART I 2PART I 1
      
1.Business 21.Business 1
1A.Risk Factors 121A.Risk Factors 10
1B.Unresolved Staff Comments 261B.Unresolved Staff Comments 29
2.Properties 262.Properties 29
3.Legal Proceedings 273.Legal Proceedings 29
4.Mine Safety Disclosures 274.Mine Safety Disclosures 29
      
PART IIPART II  27PART II   
      
5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity Securities 275.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity Securities 30
6.Selected Financial Data 286.Selected Financial Data 31
7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 297.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 32
7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 387A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 37
8.Financial Statements and Supplemental Data 388.Financial Statements and Supplemental Data 37
9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 389.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 38
9A.Controls and Procedures 399A.Controls and Procedures 38
9B.Other Information 409B.Other Information 38
      
PART IIIPART III  40PART III  
      
10.Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance 4010.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 39 
11.Executive Compensation 4611.Executive Compensation 39
12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 5212.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 39
13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence 5313.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 39
14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services 5514.Principal Accountant Fees and Services 39
      
PART IVPART IV  57PART IV  
      
15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 5715.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 40
   
Financial Statements F-1

 

i

 

 

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Report”) contains forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, in the sections captioned “Business,” “Risk Factors,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and elsewhere. Any and all statements contained in this Report that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed forward-looking statements. Terms such as “may,” “might,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “project,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “strategy,” “anticipate,” “attempt,” “develop,” “plan,” “help,” “believe,” “continue,” “intend,” “expect,” “future,” and terms of similar import (including the negative of any of the foregoing) may be intended to identify forward-looking statements. However, not all forward-looking statements may contain one or more of these identifying terms. Forward-looking statements in this Report may include, without limitation, statements regarding (i) the plans and objectives of management for future operations, including plans or objectives relating to the development of commercially viable radio frequency (“RF”) filters and the pursuit of relationships with original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and R&D development agreements and joint ventures with customers and other strategic partners, (ii) expectations of our current and future products’ performance and competitive position, (iii) a projection of income (including income/loss), earnings (including earnings/loss) per share, capital expenditures, dividends, capital structure or other financial items, (iii)(iv) our future financial performance, including any such statement contained in a discussion and analysis of financial condition by management or in the results of operations included pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC,Securities and (iv)Exchange Commission (“SEC”), (v) our ability to efficiently utilize cash and cash equivalents to support our operations for a given period of time, (vi) our ability to engage customers while maintaining ownership of our intellectual property, and (vii) the assumptions underlying or relating to any statement described in points (i), (ii) or (iii)through (vi) above.

 

The forward-looking statements are not meant to predict or guarantee actual results, performance, events or circumstances and may not be realizedbecause they are based upon our current projections, plans, objectives, beliefs, expectations, estimates and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties and other influences, many of which are beyond our control. Actual results and the timing of certain events and circumstances may differ materially from those described by the forward-looking statements as a result of these risks and uncertainties. Factors that may influence or contribute to the inaccuracy of the forward-looking statements or cause actual results to differ materially from expected or desired results may include, without limitation, our inability to obtain adequate financing, our limited operating history, our inability to generate revenues or achieve profitability, the results of our research and development (R&D) activities, our inability to achieve acceptance of our products in the market, general economic conditions, including upturns and downturns in the industry, our limited number of patents, failure to obtain, maintain and enforce our intellectual property rights, our inability to attract and retain qualified personnel, our reliance on third parties to complete certain processes in connection with the manufacture of our products, product quality and defects, existing or increased competition, our ability to market and sell our products, our inability to successfully integrate our STC-MEMS Business (as defined below under “Business — Recent Developments — Business Developments”) in our business, our failure to innovate or adapt to new or emerging technologies, our failure to comply with regulatory requirements, results of any arbitration or litigation that may arise, stock volatility and illiquidity, our failure to implement our business plans or strategies, our failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, and our failure to maintain the Trusted Foundry accreditation of our New York fabrication facility.

our inability to obtain adequate financing,

our limited operating history,

our inability to generate revenues or achieve profitability,

our inability to service the debt represented by our $25.0 million principal amount of senior convertible notes issued in calendar year 2018,

the results of our research and development (“R&D”) activities,

our inability to achieve acceptance of our products in the market,

general economic conditions, including upturns and downturns in the industry,

risks related to doing business in foreign countries,

any security breaches or other disruptions compromising our proprietary information and exposing us to liability,

our limited number of patents,

failure to obtain, maintain and enforce our intellectual property rights,

our inability to attract and retain qualified personnel,

our reliance on third parties to complete certain processes in connection with the manufacture of our products,

product quality and defects,

existing or increased competition,

our ability to market and sell our products,

our inability to successfully scale the New York fabrication facility and related operations into our business and to maintain a successful fabrication operation,

our failure to innovate or adapt to new or emerging technologies, including in relation to our competitors,

our failure to comply with regulatory requirements,

ii

results of any present or future arbitration or litigation,

stock volatility and illiquidity,

our failure to implement our business plans or strategies,

our failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, and

our failure to obtain the Trusted Foundry accreditation of our New York fabrication facility.

A description of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those described by the forward-looking statements in this Report appears in the section captioned “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Report.   

 

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements because of the risks and uncertainties related to them and to the risk factors. Except as may be required by law, we do not undertake any obligation to update the forward-looking statements contained in this Report to reflect any new information or future events or circumstances or otherwise.

  

DEFINITIONS

 

When used in this Report, the terms, “we,” “Akoustis,” the “Company,” “our,” and “us” refers to Akoustis Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its wholly owned consolidated subsidiaries,subsidiary, Akoustis, Inc. and Akoustis Manufacturing New York, Inc., each of which arealso a Delaware corporations.corporation.

 

Glossary

The following is a glossary of technical terms used herein:

Acoustic wave- a mechanical wave that vibrates in the same direction as its direction of travel.

AlN- Aluminum Nitride.

Acoustic wave filter- an electromechanical device that provides radio frequency control and selection, in which an electrical signal is converted into a mechanical wave in a device constructed of a piezoelectric material and then back to an electrical signal.

Band, channel or frequency band - a designated range of radio wave frequencies used to communicate with a mobile device.

Bulk acoustic wave (BAW)- an acoustic wave traveling through a material exhibiting elasticity, typically vertical or perpendicular to the surface of a piezoelectric material.

Digital baseband- the digital transceiver, which includes the main processor for the communication device.

Duplexer- a bi-directional device that connects the antenna to the transmitter and receiver of a wireless device and simultaneously filters both the transmit signal and receive signal.

Filter- a series of interconnected resonators designed to pass (or select) a desired radio frequency signal and block unwanted signals.


iii

Group III element nitrides- a dielectric material comprised of group IIIA element, such as boron (B), aluminum (Al) or gallium (Ga), combined with group 5A (or VA nitrogen) to form a compound semiconductor nitride such as BN, AlN, or GaN. For resonators, the dielectric is typically chosen based upon the piezoelectric constant of the material in order to generate the highest electromechanical coupling.

Insertion Loss- the power losses associated with inserting a BAW filter into a circuit.

Lossy- resistive losses that result in heat generation.

Metrology- techniques used to evaluate materials, devices and circuits.

Monolithic topology- a description of an electrical circuit whereby all the elements of the circuit are fabricated at the same time using the same process flow.

Power Amplifier Duplexer (PAD) - an RF module containing a power amplifier and duplex filter components for the RFFE of a smartphone.

Piezoelectric materials- certain solid materials (such as crystals and certain ceramics) that produce a voltage in response to applied mechanical stress, or that deform when a voltage is applied to them.

Quality factor, or Q- energy stored divided by the energy dissipated per cycle. Higher Q represents a higher caliber of resonance and implies mechanical and electrical factors responsible for energy dissipation are minimal. For a given amount of energy stored in a resonator, Q represents the number of cycles resonance will continue without additional input of energy into the system.

Resonator- a device whose impedance sharply changes over a narrow frequency range and is characterized by one or more ‘resonance frequency’ due to a standing wave across the resonator’s electrodes. The vibrations in a resonator can be characterized by mechanical “acoustic” waves which travel without a characteristic sound velocity. Resonators are the building blocks for RF filters used in mobile wireless devices.

RF- radio frequency.

RF front-end (RFFE)- the circuitries in a mobile device responsible for processing the analog radio signals; located between the device’s antenna and the digital baseband.

RF spectrum - a defined range of frequencies.

Surface acoustic wave (SAW) - an acoustic sound wave traveling horizontally along the surface of a piezoelectric material.

TDD LTE - Time Division Duplex- Long-Term Evolution or a wireless standard which shares the bandwidth between transmit and receive.

Tier one - a supplier or OEM with substantial market share.

Tier two - a supplier or OEM with an established but not substantial market share.

Trusted Foundry- The Trusted Foundry Program was initiated by the Department of Defense in 2004 to ensure mission-critical national defense systems access to leading-edge integrated circuits from secure, domestic sources. Defense Microelectronics Activity (DMEA) is the manager of the Trusted Foundry Program for the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).  It is a joint DoD / National Security Agency (NSA) program and is administered by the NSA’s Trusted Access Program Office (TAPO).

Wafer- a thin slice of semiconductor material used in electronics for the fabrication of integrated circuits.

iv

PART I

 

ITEM 1.BUSINESS

 

Overview

 

AkoustisAkoustis® is an early stageemerging commercial company focused on developing, designing and manufacturing innovative radio frequency (RF)RF filter products for the mobile wireless device industry.industry, including for products such as smartphones and tablets, network infrastructure equipment, WiFi Customer Premise Equipment (“CPE”) and defense applications. Located between the device’s antenna and its digital backend, the RF front-end (“RFFE”) is the circuitry that performs the analog signal processing and contains components such as amplifiers, filters and switches. We usehave developed a patented fundamentally new piezoelectric resonator technology that we call BulkONE® in the manufacturing ofand proprietary microelectromechanical systems (“MEMS”) based bulk acoustic wave (BAW) resonators,(“BAW”) technology and unique manufacturing flow, which we have trademarked as XBAW. Our XBAWTMprocess incorporates optimized high purity piezoelectric materials designed to achieve high power, high frequency and/or wide bandwidth filter performance. Filters are critical in selecting and rejecting signals, and their performance enables differentiation in the building blockshardware modules defining the RFFE.

We believe owning the core resonator device technology, manufacturing facility and intellectual property (“IP”) to produce our designs is the most direct and efficient means of high selectivity “RF” filters requireddelivering our solutions to route signalsthe market. Furthermore, our technology is based upon bulk-mode acoustic resonance, which we believe is superior to surface-mode acoustic resonance for high-band applications that include 4G/LTE, 5G, WiFi, and defense applications. Although some of our target customers utilize or make the RFFE module, they may lack access to critical ultra-high band (UHB) filter technology needed to compete in a smartphone or otherhigh-frequency applications. We intend to design, manufacture, and market our RF filter products to mobile or wearable device, cellularphone original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), defense OEMs, network infrastructure OEMs, and WiFi routers. FiltersCPE OEM’s to enable broader competition among the front-end module manufacturers. We operate as a “pure-play” RF filter supplier and align with the front-end module manufacturers who seek to acquire high performance filters to expand their module business.

We currently build high performance RF filter circuits, using our first generation XBAWTM wafer process, in our 120,000 square-foot wafer-manufacturing facility located in Canandaigua, New York, which we acquired in June 2017. As of September 11, 2019, our (IP) portfolio included 24 patents, including one blocking patent that we have licensed from Cornell University. Additionally, we have 52 active and pending patent applications. These patents cover our XBAWTMRF filter technology from the substrate level through the system application layer. Where possible, we leverage both federal and state level R&D grants to support development and commercialization of our technology.

We are developing RF filters for 4G/LTE, 5G, WiFi and defense bands using our proprietary resonator device models and product design kits (PDK’s). As we qualify our first RF filter products, we are engaging with target customers to evaluate our filter solutions. Our initial designs target UHB, sub-7 GHz 4G/LTE, 5G, WiFi and defense bands. Since Akoustis owns its core technology and controls access to its intellectual property, we expect to offer several ways to engage with potential customers. First, we intend to engage with multiple wireless markets, providing standardized filters that we design and offer as standard catalog components. Second, we expect to deliver unique filters to customer-supplied specifications, which we will design and fabricate on a critical componentcustomized basis. Finally, we may offer our models and design kits for our customers to design their own filters utilizing our proprietary technology.

We have earned minimal revenue from operations since inception, and we have funded our operations primarily with development contracts, RF filter prototype and initial production orders, government grants, MEMS foundry and engineering services, sales of our equity securities, and issuance of debt. We have incurred losses totaling approximately $67.5 million from inception through June 30, 2019. These losses are primarily the RF front-end (RFFE)result of material and processing costs associated with developing and commercializing our technology, as well as personnel costs, professional fees (primarily accounting and legal), and their use has multiplied with the launchother general and licensingadministrative (“G&A”) expenses. We expect to continue to incur substantial costs for commercialization of 4G/LTE, emerging 5Gour technology on a continuous basis because our business model involves materials and WiFi frequency bands. They are used to define the rangesolid-state device technology development and engineering of frequenciescatalog and custom filter design solutions.


Plan of radio signals that are transmitted (the “passband”) and simultaneously reject unwanted signals.

Operation

 

We plan to use single-crystal piezoelectric materials to develop a new class ofcommercialize our technology by designing and manufacturing single-band and multi-band BAW RF filtersfilter solutions in our New York wafer fabrication facility. We expect our filter solutions will address problems (such as power loss, bandwidth, power handling, and isolation) created by the growing number and convergence of frequency bands in the RFFE of mobile devices, infrastructure and premise equipment to support 4G/LTE, 5G, and WiFi. We have prototyped our first single-band BAW filter designs for 4G/LTE frequency bands, which are dominated by competitive BAW solutions and historically cannot be addressed with low-band, lower power handling surface acoustic wave (“SAW”) technology.

To succeed, we must convince mobile phone OEMs, RFFE module manufacturers, network infrastructure OEMs, WiFi CPE OEMs and defense customers to use our XBAWTM filter technology in their systems and modules. However, since there are two dominant BAW filter suppliers in the industry that have high-band technology, and both utilize such technology as a fundamentalcompetitive advantage at the module level, we expect customers that lack access to reduce losses over existing thin film RFhigh-band filter technologies. We believe our technology will be disruptiveopen to the RFFE market through the following expected advantages:

Wider bandwidth coverage,
Smaller filter supports higher level of integration and lower manufacturing costs,
Lower insertion loss,
Improved power compression and linearity,
Reduced power amplifier cost, for the ultimate purpose of manufacturing our BAW RF filters,
Reduced heat generation and reduced battery loading, and
Reduced guard band between adjacent frequency bands.

Onceengage with our technology is qualified for mass production, we expect to design and sell single-crystal BAW RFpure-play filter products using our BulkONE® technology. Our product focus is on innovative single-band filter products for the growing smartphone and RFFE module market, which can be used to make duplexer or multiplexer filter products necessary for the mobile market. These products present the greatest near-term potential for commercialization of our technology. According to a Mobile Experts May 2016 report, the mobile filter market is expected to grow from $8.2 billion in 2017 to greater than $12 billion by 2021.company. 

 

Recent Developments

Business Developments

In August 2016, we announced our first customer engagementwhen we entered into multiple non-exclusive agreements with a Chinese tier one RFFE module manufacturerWe plan to supply it with our premiumpursue RF filter products for next-generation high-band RFFE modules for 4G, emerging 4.5Gdesign and 5G mobile - targeting the ChinaR&D development agreements and India OEM markets. In December 2016,potentially joint ventures with target customers and other strategic partners. These types of arrangements may subsidize technology development costs and qualification, filter design costs, and offer complementary technology and market intelligence and other avenues to revenue. However, we announcedintend to retain ownership of our second customer engagement, this time for thecore technology, intellectual property, designs, and related improvements. We expect to pursue development of a band-specific, high-frequency (above 3.5 GHz) BAW RF filtercatalog designs for a non-mobile commercial application with a well-established OEM, specializingmultiple customers and to offer such catalog products in non-mobile defense systems, with annual revenues ofone or more than $1 billion.  In May 2017, we announced our third customer engagement, this time for the development of high-performance BAW duplexers for non-mobile communication systems with a multi-billion dollar U.S. Fortune 500 company that provides systems, products and solutions to government and commercial customers worldwide.

sales channels.

 


Recent Developments

On March 23, 2017,

Business Developments

In July 2018, we entered intocompleted the qualification of our high purity piezoelectric materials process and our XBAWTM manufacturing process to support an Asset Purchase Agreementinitial product family of 4G/LTE, 5G mobile, WiFi and defense filter solutions. Now that we have stabilized our resonator process technology in a Real Property Purchase Agreement (collectively, the “STC-MEMS Agreements”) with The Research Foundation for the State Universitymanufacturing environment, we intend to complete a production release of New York (“RF-SUNY”) and Fuller Road Management Corporation (“FRMC”), an affiliate of RF-SUNY (collectively, “Sellers”), respectively, to acquire certain specified assets, including STC-MEMS, a semiconductor wafer-manufacturing and microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) operation with associated wafer-manufacturing tools, and the associated real estate and improvements located in Canandaigua, New York usedour RF filter products in the operation of STC-MEMS (the assetsfrequency range from 1 to 7 GHz. The target frequency bands will be prioritized based upon customer priority. We expect this will require recruiting and real estatehiring additional personnel and improvements referred to together herein as the “STC-MEMS Business”). Pursuant to the STC-MEMS Agreements, the Company also agreed to assume post acquisition date substantially all of the ongoing obligations of the STC-MEMS Business incurred in the ordinary course of business.capital investments.

 

We completedadded our first 5G network infrastructure customer for the acquisitionCitizen’s Broadband Radio Service in August 2018 and announced first samples to our 5G customer in March 2019. We announced a second 5G network infrastructure customer in October 2018, and we provided initial samples of the STC-MEMS Business through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Akoustis Manufacturing New York, Inc., a Delaware corporation formed3.5 GHz CBRS filter product in connection with the acquisition, on June 26, 2017March 2019. In September 2018, we recorded our first XBAWTM filter revenue from our defense customer for an aggregate purchase price of $2.8 millionpre-production units and received multiple follow-on orders in cash. The Company recorded net assets acquired of $6.3 million for purchase consideration of $4.6 million (includes $2.85 million of cash paid at closing plus $1.7m real estate contingent liability), which resulted in the recording of a bargain purchase gain of $1.7 million. The Company reviewed what factors might contribute to a bargain purchase to determine if it was reasonable for a bargain purchase to occur. We determined the factors that contributedaddition to the bargainoriginal purchase price were:

The transaction was completed with a motivated seller who the Company believed was very hesitant to liquidate assets and lay-off employees in the current political environment.

The cash burn of the facility (approximately $3.0 million annually) was an economic burden to the sellers.
The Company, the County and State were motivated to approve the transaction without significant price negotiation, as they believed it would insure the employment of the headcount and provide the opportunity for increased headcount and increased investment in the facility that would add to the tax base.  

Based upon these factors, the Company concluded that the occurrence of a bargain purchase was reasonable.order for production units.

 

The STC-MEMs acquisition allowsIn December 2018, we introduced the AKF-1256, a 5.6 GHz BAW filter for the WiFi market and shipped samples to select partners for evaluation and testing. We are currently shipping production units of the AKF-1938 to our defense customer and have shipped pre-production units of our AKF-1252 product to multiple WiFi customers, including a new customer that signed a supply agreement with an initial order of more than 80,000 AK-1252 filters, which were delivered in the quarter ended March 31, 2019.

In May 2019, we announced receipt of sub-6GHz 5G filter development order from tier one wireless telecommunication customer and successfully delivered our first 5G prototype filter for mobile devices in June 2019. As we receive customer evaluations for our growing portfolio, we will do further iterations on the designs and provide next generation samples for evaluation and characterization. 

Financing Developments

On October 23, 2018, the Company to internalize manufacturing, increase capacity and control its wafer supply chain for single crystal BAW RF filters. We have now successfully transferred our R&D resonator filter process flow intocompleted the facility, and we plan to utilize the facility to optimize our BulkONE® technology and to consolidate all aspectsoffering of wafer manufacturing for our disruptive and patented high band BAW RF filters targeting the multi-billion dollar mobile and other wireless markets. This planned consolidation$10.0 million principal amount of the Company’s supply chain into6.5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023. The notes are unsecured and rank pari passu with the STC-MEMS Business startedCompany’s outstanding unsubordinated liabilities. As unsecured obligations, the notes effectively rank junior in right of payment to our secured indebtedness, including our $15.0 million outstanding principal amount of convertible senior secured notes issued in May 2018. The net proceeds of the offering after payment of offering costs were approximately $8.9 million. The notes will mature on June 26, 2017November 30, 2023, unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased. Interest on the notes accrues at the rate of 6.5% per year and is expectedpayable in cash on each February 28, May 31, August 31 and November 30, beginning February 28, 2019. The notes are convertible into common stock at the option of the holder at any time prior to shorten time-to-market for our RF products, greatly enhancing our abilitymaturity at an initial conversion price of $5.10 per share, subject to service customers upon completion of development and design specifications. Furthermore, we believe that shorter time-to-market cycles provide us with the opportunity to increase the number of our potential customers.adjustment under certain circumstances.

 

In August 2017, we announced our first shipmentAdditionally, on October 23, 2018, the Company sold a total of premium high-band BAW RF filter prototypes manufactured using our patented single-crystal BulkONE® technology7,250,000 shares of its common stock at a price to the aforementioned Chinese tier one customer. The shipment included high performance, LTE-TDD Band 41, 2.6 GHz BAW RF filters that we believe will satisfypublic of $4.25 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of $30.8 million, before deducting the challenging filter requirements inunderwriting discount and offering expenses payable by the high growth 4G LTE mobile market in China. Shortly thereafter, we announced our first 3.5GHz RF filter shipments to our second customer for a key Radar application.

Organizational Developments

On August 11, 2016, we changed our fiscal year from a fiscal year ending on March 31Company of each year to one ending on June 30 of each year, effective for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017. On October 31, 2016, we filed a transition report on Form 10-K for the transition period from April 1, 2016 to June 30, 2016.approximately $2.1 million.

Following stockholder approval at our 2016 annual stockholders’ meeting, we changed our state of incorporation from the State of Nevada to the State of Delaware on December 15, 2016.

Glossary

The following is a glossary of technical terms used herein:

Acoustic wave — a mechanical wave that vibrates in the same direction as its direction of travel.
AlGaN— Aluminum Gallium Nitride.
AlN— Aluminum Nitride.
Acoustic wave filter — an electromechanical device that provides radio frequency control and selection, in which an electrical signal is converted into a mechanical wave in a device constructed of a piezoelectric material and then back to an electrical signal.

 


Band, channel or frequency band — a designated range of radio wave frequencies used to communicate with a mobile device.
Bulk acoustic wave (BAW) — an acoustic wave traveling through a material exhibiting elasticity, typically vertical or perpendicular to the surface of a piezoelectric material.
Digital baseband — the digital transceiver, which includes the main processor for the communication device.
Duplexer— a bi-directional device that connects the antenna to the transmitter and receiver of a wireless device and simultaneously filters both the transmit signal and receive signal.
Filter— a series of interconnected resonators designed to pass (or select) a desired radio frequency signal and block unwanted signals.
Group III element nitrides — a dielectric material comprised of group IIIA element, such as boron (B), aluminum (Al) or gallium (Ga), combined with group 5A (or VA nitrogen to form a compound semiconductor nitride such as BN, AlN, or GaN. For resonators, the dielectric is typically chosen based upon the piezoelectric constant of the material in order to generate the highest electromechanical coupling.
Insertion Loss —The power losses associated with inserting a BAW filter into a circuit.
K-Squared— electromechanical coupling factor that determines the effective bandwidth of a filter.
Lossy— resistive losses that result in heat generation.
Metrology— techniques used to evaluate materials, devices and circuits.
Monolithic topology — a description of an electrical circuit whereby all the elements of the circuit are fabricated at the same time using the same process flow.
Power Amplifier Duplexer (PAD) — an RF module containing a power amplifier and duplex filter components for the RFFE of a smartphone.
Piezoelectric materials — certain solid materials (such as crystals and certain ceramics) that produce a voltage in response to applied mechanical stress, or that deform when a voltage is applied to them.

Quality factor, or Q — energy stored divided by the energy dissipated per cycle. Higher Q represents a higher caliber of resonance, and implies mechanical and electrical factors responsible for energy dissipation are minimal. For a given amount of energy stored in a resonator, Q represents the number of cycles resonance will continue without additional input of energy into the system.
Resonator— a device whose impedance sharply changes over a narrow frequency range and is characterized by one or more ‘resonance frequency’ due to a standing wave across the resonator’s electrodes. The vibrations in a resonator can be characterized by mechanical “acoustic” waves which travel without a characteristic sound velocity. Resonators are the building blocks for RF filters used in mobile wireless devices.
RF— radio frequency.
RF front-end (RFFE) — the circuitries in a mobile device responsible for processing the analog radio signals; located between the device’s antenna and the digital baseband.
RF spectrum— a defined range of frequencies.

Surface acoustic wave (SAW) — an acoustic sound wave traveling horizontally along the surface of a piezoelectric material.
TDD LTE— Time Division Duplex- Long-Term Evolution or a wireless standard which shares the bandwidth between transmit and receive.
Tier one— a supplier or OEM with dominant market share.
Tier two—  a supplier or OEM with an established but not dominant market share.
Trusted Foundry— The Trusted Foundry Program was initiated by the Department of Defense in 2004 to ensure mission-critical national defense systems access to leading-edge integrated circuits from secure, domestic sources. Defense Microelectronics Activity (DMEA) is the manager of the Trusted Foundry Program for the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).  It is a joint DoD / National Security Agency (NSA) program and is administered by the NSA’s Trusted Access Program Office (TAPO).
Wafer— a thin slice of semiconductor material used in electronics for the fabrication of integrated circuits.

Our Technology

 

Current RF acoustic wave filters utilize a technologytechnologies that isare limited by the piezoelectric material physical properties, of the base filter component.resonator device structure and/or the manufacturing process technology. Existing BAW filters use an “acoustic wave ladder” that is based on a monolithic topology approach using lossy polycrystalline materials. By contrast, our BulkONE®XBAW technology uses a single-crystal material,high purity materials, which provides 30% higher piezoelectric properties, compared to conventional polycrystalline materials used in the industry today.high performance acoustic properties. We have fabricated R&D resonators that demonstrate the feasibility of our approach and believe our technology will yield a new generation of high frequency RF filter products.

BulkONE®

XBAW technology consists of novel single-crystalhigh purity piezoelectric materials, which are fabricated into bulk-mode, acoustic wave resonators and RF filters. Our patented piezoelectric materials contain high-purity Group III element nitride materials and possess a unique signature, which can be detected by conventional material metrology tools. We utilize analytical modeling techniques to aid in the design and internal manufacturing of our materials, andwhereby the raw substrate materials utilized in our raw material specificationsXBAW process are typically outsourced tosourced from a third party for manufacturing.party. Once our materialsfilter designs are simulated and ready for processing,to manufacture, we supply our NY fabrication facility raw materials, a mask design file, and a unique process sequence in order to fabricate our resonators and filters. Our wafer process flow is patented and compatible with wafer level packaging (WLP) that allows for low profile, cost effective filters to be produced.

 

Challenges Facing the Mobile Device Industry

 

Rising consumer demand for always-on wireless broadband connectivity is creating an unprecedented need for high performance RFFE for mobile devices. Mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets are quickly becoming the primary means of accessing the Internet, thereby driving the Internet of Things (IoT). The rapid growth in mobile data traffic is testing the limits of existing wireless bandwidth. Carriers and regulators have responded by opening new spectrums of RF frequencies, driving up the number of frequency bands in mobile devices. This substantial increase in frequency bands has created a demand for more filters, as well as a demand for filters with higher selectivity. The global transition to LTE and adoption of LTE-Advanced with more sophisticated carrier aggregation and multiple-input, multiple-output (MIMO) techniques will continue to push the requirements for increased supply of high performancehigh-performance filters. Furthermore, the introduction of 5G mobile technologies and their associated frequencies over the next several years will create an even greater need for high-performance, high-frequency filters as the bands being auctioned have primarily been in the 3-6 GHz range, well above current networks.

 

Furthermore, theThe new spectrum introduced by 4G/LTE and emerging 5G is driving spectrum licensing at higher frequencies than previous 3G smartphone models. For example, new TDD LTE frequencies allocated for 4G5G wireless cover frequencies nearly twice as high as those covered in previous generation phones. As a result, the demand for filters represents the single largest growth opportunity in the RFFE industry, according to a Mobile Experts May 20162018 report. For traditional “low band” frequencies, SAW filters have been the primary choice, while high band solutions have utilized BAW filters due to their performance and yield. While there are multiple sources of supply for SAW technology, the source of supply for BAW filters is more limited and essentially dominated by two manufacturers worldwide. See “Competition” below.

 


In addition, signal loss of current generation acoustic wave filters is excessively high, and up to half of the transmit power is wasted as heat, which ultimately constrains battery life. Another challenge is that the allocated spectrum for mobile communication bands requires high bandwidth RF filters, which, in turn, requires wide bandwidth core resonator technology. In addition, filters with inferior selectivity either reduce the available operating bands the mobile device can support or increase the noise in the operating bands. Each of these problems negatively impacts the end-user’s experience when using the mobile device.

 

The RFFE must meet growing data demands while reducing cost and improving battery life. Our solution involves a new approach to RFFE component manufacturing, enabled by BulkONE®XBAW technology. We expect our technology to produce filters that will reduce the overall system cost and improve performance of the RFFE.

 


Our Solutions

 

Our immediate focus is on the commercialization of wide bandwidth RF filters operating in the high frequency portion ofspectrum known as the RFFE (called high band).sub 6 GHz bands. Using our BulkONE®XBAW technology, we believe these filters enable new PAD module or RFFE competition for high band modules as well as performance-driven low band applications. Initially, we expect to target select strategic RFFE market leaders as well as tier two mobile phone original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and/or RFFE module suppliers. Longer term, our focus will be to expand our market share by engaging with multipleadditional mobile phone OEMs and RFFE module manufacturers. We have transitionedmanufacture our wafer technology toin our Canandaigua, NY fabrication facility andwhere we continue to focus on the commercialization of our filters using our BulkONE® technology. This will be the first in a series of R&D activities that will set the foundation for filter products that we believe can disrupt the high band filter market.XBAW technology We willplan to develop a series of filter designs to be used in the manufacturing of discrete filters, duplexers or more complex multiplexers targeting the 4G/LTE, 5G, WiFi and emerging 5Gdefense frequency bands. We believe our filter designs will create an alternative for, and replace, filters currently manufactured using materials with fundamentally inferior performance. Figure 1 below illustrates characterization plots that represent the high power, high bandwidth and high frequency capability of our essential single crystal materials.

  

Figure 1-Characteristics of our essentially single crystal materials used to fabricate our BAW RF filters.filters .

 

 

 

Single-Band Discrete Designs, for Duplexers and Multiplexers

SAW filters have been preferred in modern RFFE because of their high performance, small size and low cost. However, traditional SAW ladder designs do not perform well in high frequency bands or bands with closely spaced receive and transmit channels, typical of many new bands. Therefore, BAW filters are needed for these bands. We have demonstrated in a development environment our Canandaigua, NY wafer fabrication facility an ability to fabricate BAW resonators, the building block of BAW filters, that are more efficient than existing available BAW resonators,offer high frequency, wide bandwidth and high power performance. Furthermore, we believe the improved efficiency provided by BAW filters will reduce the total cost of RFFE, offer efficient use of shared frequency spectrum as well as reduce the battery demand forof mobile devices. Additionally, we believe that our BulkONE® filtersXBAW technology will allow for a single manufacturing method that will support all of the BAW filter band range and a significant portion of the SAW band range. Figure 2 below illustrates what we believe will be the frequency range of our BulkONE®XBAW technology.

  


Figure 2- The potential range of our technology

 

 

 

Pure-Play Filter Provider Enables New Module Competition

 

Given the high sound velocity in our piezoelectric materials, our technology allows for a wide range of frequency coverage, and we plan to supply filters that will support 4G/LTE, emerging 5G, WiFi and WiFidefense bands. We have successfully demonstrated resonators that will support the design and fabrication of 4G/LTE filters, WiFi filters and our current focus is on completingdefense filters, with frequencies adjacent to the emerging 5G mobile auctions. We completed the development required to transition this single-crystal BAWour XBAW technology to high volume manufacturing.manufacturing in June 2018. We willaim to be a pure-play filter supplier that will address the increasing RF complexity placed on RFFE manufacturers supporting 4G/LTE 5G,and WiFi. Figure 3 illustrates the historical and projected growth in RF complexity.

 

Figure 3- Increase in Filter content in Mobile Phone Front End Modules (FEMs) from 20152016 - 2021 (Source: EricssonMobile Experts 2016)

 

 

  


Commercialization

 

Our immediate focus is on the commercialization of wide bandwidth RF filters to address the RFFEWiFi, Infrastructure and defense bands with innovative single-band designs using our BulkONE® high band spectrumXBAW sub 6 GHz RF filter technology. We are currently developing our first commercial single-band filterfilters through our STC-MEMS Business wafer fabrication facility. We are focused on developing fixed-band filters because we believe these designs present the greatest near-term potential for commercialization of our technology, and that once demonstrated, the STC-MEMS facility can be more efficiently readied for production compared to alternative technologies.

 


Our technology development plan containsprocess consists of the following milestones:five phases:

 

 1.Milestone 1 (Manufacturing Gap Analysis) - Validate required materials, people, process and equipment are present for volume manufacturing.

Milestone 2 (Process Transfer to STC-MEMS Business) - Design of filters, technology transfer and fabrication on high-volume manufacturing equipment, achieve fully tested wafers, and delivery of RF filter product prototypes.Pre-Alpha – Demonstrate basic feasibility/capabilities

 

 2.

Milestone 3 (Complete Filter Process Capability) - Update RF filter design including process improvements, fabricate and test multiple wafers using the approved manufacturing process flow, calculate yields, and complete delivery of initial product prototypes.

Alpha – Develop stable recipe (Process freeze) with limited production development

 

 3.Milestone 4 (Production-Ready Filter Design) - FilterBeta – Complete technology qualification (Process qualification) in factory to enable product design complete and manufacturing process locked.

 

 4.Milestone 5 (Product PackagingPre-Production – Demonstrate lead product production capabilities, release final design tools

5.Production – Continual improvement of process and Ramp) - Product fully packaged and ready for production, focus shift to revenue generation from filter sales.parametric performance

 

Milestones 1, 2In March 2018, we announced the completion of the alpha-phase for our first generation XBAW process technology called XB1. In July 2018 we announced the completion of the beta-phase for both the XB1 and 3 are complete. We continue to make progress on Milestones 4our materials process. This shortens the development cycle time for new catalog and 5. We expect to generate revenues from the sale of our filterscustom components as each new product will start in the first half of the 2018 calendar year, after completion of Milestones 4pre-production phase and 5.will not require end-to-end qualification.

 


ResearchResearch and Development

 

Since inception, the Company’s focus has been on developing an innovative mobile-wireless filter technology with a compelling value proposition to our potential customers and a significant and noticeable impact to the end user. Whereas today’s polycrystalline material (used to manufacture RF resonators and filters) is sputtered on a metal-coated carrier, our patented BulkONE®XBAW technology employs high quality, single-crystal resonatorpurity piezoelectric films in our resonators, which are used as the enabler to create high performance BAW RF filters. This single-crystal material isOur high purity piezoelectric materials are a key differentiator when compared to the incumbent amorphous thin-film technologies because it increases the acoustic velocity, and the electromechanical coupling coefficient in the resonator which results in higherand/or high-power performance. These technology features allow Akoustis to engineer RF filter efficienciessolutions for a broad spectrum for multiple radio frequencies and lower power consumption, leading to simplified RFFEs, longer battery life, reduced tissue heating, and ultimately lower manufacturing costs.thus multiple end markets. Research and development expense totaled $ 4,425,778$19.3 million for the year ended June 30, 20172019 and $1,758,701$13.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2016.2018. These R&D activities focused on single-crystal materialhigh purity piezoelectric materials development and resonator demonstration. Current R&D investments include single-crystal materials advancement, technology transfer to our manufacturing partner and resonator development, RF filter design and filter design.high yield wafer manufacturing.

 

As a result of our efforts, we have developed and recently published a measured filter designed for 3.5GHz to 3.9GHz applications.introduced several new filters which are currently sampling with multiple customers across multiple markets. Our focus is nowremains on improving the electromechanical coupling and quality factor of our resonator technology and the performance of our fabricated filters through design improvements and process optimization experiments.

 

We announced our first filter in March 2018, the AKF-1252, a 5.2 GHz filter for the WiFi premise equipment market. The AKF-1252 is a wideband filter for the U-NII-1&2A bands with typical insertion loss of less than 1dB, high rejection and a high-power rating in an ultra- small footprint module. Offering our customers 23-times size reduction over current dielectric resonator technology, our product is the first BAW RF filter targeting the 5.2 GHz WiFi band and achieved pre-production status in November 2018. In addition, we have announced the sister part to the AKF-1252, called the AKF-1256, which allows the Company to bundle the 5.2 GHz and 5.6 GHz filter solutions to the CPE market. The Company received its first pre-production order in May 2019. The tandem 5.2 GHz and 5.6 GHz filter solutions allow coexistence of WiFi signals in the 5GHz spectrum as shown below.

 


Following the AKF-1252, we also announced the AKF-1652, a 5.2 GHz filter for the WiFi device market, with lower insertion loss. We are developing technology for filters applications at frequencies greater than 5GHz. The performancecurrently working on the development of early work on resonators resonating at 5.798GHz was presented at a technical conference showing an electromechanical coupling coefficient (k2eff )small footprint, wafer-level package (WLP) that will be required before the expected uptake of 6.5%, obtained after de-embedding resonator characteristics5.2 GHz WiFi in cellular handsets and other devices. We believe that handset makers are still several years away from measured data.including tri-band WiFi in smartphones, tablets and other mobile devices, and expect to complete the packaging development ahead of the market.

 

Figure 4- Akoustis’ single crystal undoped AIN piezoelectric technology based 3.7GHzIn April 2018 we announced the AKF-1938 filter performance. The plot shows measured narrowin the 3.8 GHz band, S21 and S11 foradjacent to emerging 5G mobile frequency auctions. In July 2018, we announced that we signed our first customer, a large military OEM with annual revenue of over $1 billion. We received revenue from this product in the fabricated 3.7GHz filter, showing minimum insertion losssecond quarter of approximately 2.dB.

fiscal 2019, with follow-on new orders received in calendar 2019. 

 

We have also announced a 4G LTE infrastructure win for two adjacent filters, with engineering revenue attached and follow on production filter revenue expected upon completion of the design. Moving forward, we expect to deliver new catalog components based on the frequencies in highest demand from our customers and will announce additional products as we continue to benefit from our research and development efforts. 

 

Raw Materials

 

Within its internal manufacturing operation, Akoustis sources raw materials, process gases, metals and other miscellaneous supplies to fabricate its BAW RF filter circuits. Materials range from substrates (used to deposit key piezoelectric materials) to standard dielectric-based laminates (used for packaging of the RF filter circuits). The Company sources at least two types of substrate materials for its BAW process and the Company haswe have more than one supplier for eachone material type.and a single source for the other. Multiple process gases are used for material synthesis, process etching and wafer treatment. While there is more than one supplier for most process gases, the purity levels of such gases may change by source. Hence, either purification or process requalification may be required, as purchasepurchasing from a second source is required. Akoustis sources various high purity metals for electrode formation and interconnect layers for its RF circuits. Such metals are available in various purity levels and are available from more than one supplier. Other process handling hardware common to the semiconductor industry is available in abundance from multiple suppliers. Consistent with other semiconductor manufacturers, the Company may have to work with all its suppliers to ensure adequate supply of raw materials, process gases and metals as the Company ramps from R&D into high volume manufacturing.

 


Intellectual Property

 

We rely on a combination of intellectual property rights, including patents and trade secrets, along with copyrights, trademarks and contractual obligations and restrictions to protect our core technology and business.

 

In the United States and internationally, as of September 11, 2019, our IP portfolio included 24 patents, including one blocking patent that we have fourteen (14) patents, of which three (3) patents are the subject to a license agreement requiring further negotiation, in addition to sixteen (16)licensed from Cornell University. Additionally, we have 52 active and pending patent applications. Our intellectual property relates directlyThese patents cover our XBAWTMRF filter technology from the substrate level through the system application layer. Where possible, we leverage both federal and state level R&D grants to support development and commercialization of our single-crystal BAW technology, including materials and device designs, methods of manufacture, integrated circuit designs, wafer packaging, and point of use (to include mobile applications).technology.  Our patents expire between 2031 and 2033.2037. We intend to continue to innovate and expand our patent portfolio, and when appropriate, we will look to purchase license(s) that grant access to additional intellectual property that enables, enhances or further expands our technical capabilities and/or product.


We believe that it is likely that Akoustis will have competitive advantages from rights granted under our patent applications. Some applications, however, may not result in the issuance of any patents. In addition, any future patent may be opposed, contested, circumvented or designed around by a third party or found to be unenforceable or invalidated. Others may develop technologies that are similar or superior to our proprietary technologies, duplicate our proprietary technologies or design around patents owned or licensed by us.

 

We generally control access to, and use of, our confidential information through the use of internal and external controls, including contractual protections with employees, contractors and customers. We rely in part on the United States and international copyright laws to protect our intellectual property. All employees and consultants are required to execute confidentiality and intellectual property assignment agreements in connection with their employment and consulting relationships with us. We also require them to agree to disclose and assign to us all inventions conceived or made in connection with the employment or consulting relationship.

 

Akoustis and BulkONE are trademarks of Akoustis, Inc.

Competition

 

The RF filter market is controlled by a relatively small number of RF component suppliers. These companies include, among others, Broadcom (previously known as Avago Technologies Ltd.),Corporation, Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Qorvo, Inc., Skyworks Solutions Inc., Taiyo Yuden Co. Ltd., and TDK Epcos.Qualcomm Incorporated. Broadcom Corporation and Qorvo, Inc. dominate the high band BAW filter market, controlling a significant portion of the customer base and are increasing capacity to meet the growing RF filter demand of the 4G/LTE market.

 

Upon completion of our product development, we will compete directly with these companies to secure design slots inside RFFE modules -module targeting companies that procure filters or internally source filters. While many of our competitors have more resources than we have, we believe that our filter designs will be superior in performance, and we will approach prospective customers as a pure-play filter supplier, offering advantages in performance over the full frequency range at competitive costs. Our challengechallenges will be to convinceinclude convincing our customers that we have a strong intellectual property position, that we will be able to deliver in volume, that we will meet their price targets, and that we can satisfy reliability and other requirements. For a list of other competitive factors, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors - We are still developing many of our products, and they may not be accepted in the market.”

 


Employees

 

We place an emphasis on hiring the best talent at the right time to enable our core technology and business growth. This includes establishing a competitive compensation and benefits package, thereby enhancing our ability to recruit experienced personnel and key technologists. We currently haveAs of June 30, 2019, we had a total of 5882 full-time employees plus 58 part-time employees, including 33 full-time employees located in the Canandaigua NY facility and 25 full-time and 5 part-time employees in our North Carolina facility.employees. We will continue to hire specific and targeted positions to further enable our technology and manufacturing capabilities as and when appropriate.

Government Regulations

 

Our business and products in development are subject to regulation by various federal and state governmental agencies, including the radio frequency emission regulatory activities of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”(the “FCC”), the consumer protection laws of the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”), the import/export regulatory activities of the Department of Commerce, the product safety regulatory activities of the Consumer Products Safety Commission, and the environmental regulatory activities of the Environmental Protection Agency.Agency (the “EPA”).

 

The rules and regulations of the FCC limit the RF used by, and level of power emitting from, electronic equipment. Our RF filters, as a key element enabling consumer electronic smartphone equipment, are required to comply with these FCC rules and may require certification, verification or registration of our RF filters with the FCC. Certification and verification of new equipment requires testing to ensure the equipment’s compliance with the FCC’s rules. The equipment must be labeled according to the FCC’s rules to show compliance with these rules. Testing, processing of the FCC’s equipment certificate or FCC registration and labeling may increase development and production costs and could delay the implementation of our BulkONE®XBAW acoustic wave resonator technology for our RF filters and the launch and commercial productions of our filters into the U.S. market. Electronic equipment permitted or authorized to be used by us through FCC certification or verification procedures must not cause harmful interference to licensed FCC users, and may be subject to RF interference from licensed FCC users. Selling, leasing or importing non-compliant equipment is considered a violation of FCC rules and federal law, and violators may be subject to an enforcement action by the FCC. Any failure to comply with the applicable rules and regulations of the FCC could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition by increasing our compliance costs and/or limiting our sales in the United States.

  


The semiconductor and electronics industries also have been subject to increasing environmental regulations. A number of domestic and foreign jurisdictions seek to restrict the use of various substances, a number of which have been used in our products in development or processes. While we have implemented a compliance program to ensure our product offering meets these regulations, there may be instances where alternative substances will not be available or commercially feasible, or may only be available from a single source, or may be significantly more expensive than their restricted counterparts. Additionally, if we were found to be non-compliant with any such rule or regulation, we could be subject to fines, penalties and/or restrictions imposed by government agencies that could adversely affect our operating results. Our cost to maintain compliance with existing environmental regulations is expected to be nominal based on our structure in which we outsource a majority of our operations to suppliers that are responsible for meeting environmental regulations. We will continue to monitor our quality program and expand as required to maintain compliance and ability to audit our supply chain.

 

Noncompliance with applicable regulations or requirements could subject us to investigations, sanctions, mandatory product recalls, enforcement actions, disgorgement of profits, fines, damages, civil and criminal penalties, or injunctions. An adverse outcome in any such litigation could require us to pay contractual damages, compensatory damages, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. These enforcement actions could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. If any governmental sanctions are imposed, or if we do not prevail in any possible civil or criminal litigation, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, responding to any action will likely result in a significant diversion of management’s attention and resources and an increase in professional fees.


ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

 

An investment in shares of our Common Stock is highly speculative and involves a high degree of risk. We face a variety of risks that may affect our operations or financial results, and many of those risks are driven by factors that we cannot control or predict. Before investing in our Common Stock, you should carefully consider the following risks, together with the financial and other information contained in this Report. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our Common Stock would likely decline and you may lose all or a part of your investment. Only those investors who can bear the risk of loss of their entire investment should invest in our Common Stock.

Prospective investors should consider carefully whether an investment in the Company is suitable for them in light of the information contained in this Report and the financial resources available to them. The risks described below do not purport to be all the risks to which the Company or the Company could be exposed. This section is a summary of the risks that we presently believe are material to the operations of the Company. Additional risks of which we are not presently aware or which we presently deem immaterial may also impair the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

 

Risks Related to our Business and the Industry in Which Wewhich we Operate

 

We have a limited operating history upon which investors can evaluate our business and future prospects.

 

We are an early stageemerging commercial company that has not yet begun anyrecently began commercial operations. Historically, we were a shell company with no operating history and no assets other than cash. Upon consummation of a merger with Akoustis, Inc. in May 2015, we redirected our business focus towards the development ofoperations selling advanced single-crystal BAW filter products for RFFEs for use in the mobile wireless device industry. Although Akoustis since its inceptionHistorically, we have primarily focused its activity on R&D of high efficiency acoustic wave resonator technology utilizing single-crystal piezoelectric materials, this technology has not yet obtained marketing approval or been verified in commercial manufacturing, and its RF filters have not generated any material level of sales.earned minimal revenue from operations since inception.

 

Since our expectations of potential customers and future demand for our products are based on estimates of planned operations rather thanonly limited experience, it is difficult for our management and our investors to accurately forecast and evaluate our future prospects and our revenues. Our proposed progression of our operations are therefore subject to all of the risks inherent in light of the expenses, difficulties, complications and delays frequently encountered in connection with the formationgrowth of any new business and the development of a product, as well as those risks that are specific to our business in particular. An investment in an early stage company such as ours involves a degree of risk, including the possibility that your entire investment may be lost. The risks include, but are not limited to, our reliance on third parties to complete some processes for the manufacturing of our product,products, the possibility that we will not be able to develop functional and scalable products, or that although functional and scalable, our products and/or services will not be accepted in the market. To successfully introduce and market our products at a profit, we must establish brand name recognition and competitive advantages for our products. There are no assurances that the Company can successfully address these challenges. If it is unsuccessful, the Company and its business, financial condition and operating results will be materially and adversely affected.

 

We may not generate sufficient revenues orto achieve profitability.

 

We have incurred operating losses since our inception and expect to continue to have negative cash flow from operations. We have only generated minimal revenues from shipment of product while our primary sources of funds have been R&D grants, private placementsMEMS foundry services, issuances of our equity, and debt. We have experienced net losses of approximately $15.8$67.5 million for the period from May 12, 2014 (inception) to June 30, 2017.2019. Our future profitability will depend on our ability to create a sustainable business model and generate sufficient revenues, which is subject to a number of factors, including our ability to successfully implement our strategies and execute our R&D plan, our ability to implement our improved design and cost reductions into manufacturing of our RF filters, the availability of funding, market acceptance of our products, consumer demand for end products incorporating our products, our ability to compete effectively in a crowded field, our ability to respond effectively to technological advances by timely introducing our new technologies and products, and global economic and political conditions.

   


Our future profitability also depends on our expense levels, which are influenced by a number of factors, including the resources we devote to developing and supporting our projects and potential products, the continued progress of our research and development of potential products, our ability to improve R&D efficiencies, license fees or royalties we may be required to pay, and the potential need to acquire licenses to new technology, the availability of intellectual property for licensing or acquisition, or the use of our technology in new markets, which could require us to pay unanticipated license fees and royalties in connection with these licenses.

 

Our development and commercialization efforts may prove more expensive than we currently anticipate, and we may not succeed in increasing our revenues to offset higher expenses. These expenses, among other things, may cause our net income and working capital to decrease. If we fail to generate sufficient revenue and manage our expenses, we may never achieve profitability, which would adversely and materially affect our ability to provide a return to our investors.

 

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. If we are not able to remediate these material weaknesses appropriately and timely, or if we are unable to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, this could result in losses from errors, harm our reputation or cause investors to lose confidence in the reported financial information, all or any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition, which, in turn, could adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock, our access to debt or other capital markets or other aspects of our business, prospects, results of operations or financial condition.

As a public company, we are required to maintain internal control over financial reporting and to report any material weaknesses in such internal control. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”) requires that we evaluate and determine the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and provide a management report on internal control over financial reporting. In addition, as we are no longer an emerging growth company, Sarbanes-Oxley requires that our management report on internal control over financial reporting be attested to by our independent registered public accounting firm.

As discussed further in Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures,” we have identified certain material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting relating to (i) controls over the operating effectiveness of information technology general controls relevant to the preparation of our financial statements and (ii) management review controls designed to address risks associated with complex accounting matters that arise from significant non-routine transactions. We describe the specific issues leading to these conclusions in Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures—Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.” We expect to remediate these material weaknesses in fiscal 2020.

The actions we are taking to remediate the material weaknesses, however, may be insufficient and we may in the future discover other areas of our internal controls that need improvement. If we have material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, we may not detect errors on a timely basis and our financial statements may be materially misstated. Additionally, if we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to access debt markets, equity investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the market price of our Common Stock could be adversely affected, and we could become subject to investigations by Nasdaq, the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial and management resources.

The industry and the markets in which the Company operates are highly competitive and subject to rapid technological change. Therefore, in order for our RF filters to be competitive and achieve market acceptance, we need to keep pace with rapid development of new process technologies.

 

The markets in which we intend to compete are intensely competitive. We will operate primarily in the industry that designs and produces semiconductor components for wireless communications and other wireless devices, which is subject to rapid changes in both product and process technologies based on demand and evolving industry standards. The intended markets for our products are characterized by:

 

 rapid technological developments and product evolution,

 rapid changes in customer requirements,

 frequent new product introductions and enhancements,

 continuous demand for higher levels of integration, decreased size and decreased power consumption,

 short product life cycles with declining prices over the life cycle of the product, and

 evolving industry standards.

 

The continuous evolutions of these technologies and frequent introduction of new products and enhancements have generally resulted in short product life cycles for wireless semiconductor products, in general, and for RFFEs, in particular. Our R&D activity and resulting products could become obsolete or less competitive sooner than anticipated because of a faster than anticipated change in one or more of the above-noted factors. Therefore, in order for our RF filters to be competitive and achieve market acceptance, we need to keep pace with rapid development of new process technologies, which requires us to:

 

 respond effectively to technological advances by timely introducing new technologies and products,

 successfully implement our strategies and execute our R&D plan in practice,

 improve the efficiency of our technology, and

 implement our improved design and cost reductions into manufacturing of our RF filters.

  

13 


We are still developing many of our products, and they may not be accepted in the market.

 

Although we believe that our BulkONE®XBAW acoustic wave resonator technology, that utilizeswhich can utilize single-crystal piezoelectric materials, will provideprovides material advantages over existing RF filters, and we have developed and are currently developing various methods of integration suitable for implementation of this technology tointo RF filters, we cannot be certain that our RF filters will be able to achieve or maintain market acceptance. While we have fabricated R&D resonatorsfilters that demonstrate the feasibilityperformance of our BulkONE®XBAW technology, we are still in the process of stabilizing this technology into our NY fabrication facility for manufacturing of our RF filters, and this technology is nothas been stabilized, and it has been verified yetin small volumes both in practice or on aand in commercial utilization, it has not yet been ramped in volumes for commercial scale. There are also no records that can demonstrate our ability to successfully overcome many of the risks and uncertainties frequently encountered by companies in new and rapidly evolving fields. In addition to our limited operating history, we will depend on a limited number of manufacturers and customers for a significant portion of our revenue in the future and we cannot guarantee their acceptance of our products. Each of these factors may adversely affect our ability to implement our business strategy and achieve our business goals.

 

The successful development of our BulkONE®XBAW technology and market acceptance of our RF filters will be highly complex and will depend on the following principal competitive factors, including our ability to:

 

 comply with industry standards and effectively compete against current technology for producing RF acoustic wave filters,

 differentiate our products from offerings of our competitors by delivering RF filters that are higher in quality, reliability and technical performance,

 anticipate customer and market requirements, changes in technology and industry standards and timely develop improved technologies that meet high levels of satisfaction of our potential customers,

 maintain, grow and manage our internal teams to the extent we increase our operations and develop new segments of our business,

 develop and maintain successful collaborative, strategic, and other relationships with manufacturers, customers and contractors,

 protect, develop or otherwise obtain adequate intellectual property for our technology and our filters; and

 

 obtain strong financial, sales, marketing, technical and other resources necessary to develop, test, manufacture, commercialize and market our filters.

 

If we are unsuccessful in accomplishing these objectives, we may not be able to compete successfully against current and potential competitors. As a result, our BulkONE®XBAW technology and our RF filters may not be accepted in the market and we may never attain profitability.

 

We face risks associated with the operation of our manufacturing facility.

We operate a wafer fabrication facility in Canandaigua, NY that we acquired in June 2017. We currently use several international and domestic suppliers to assemble and test our products, as well as our own test and tape and reel facilities located in the U.S.

A number of factors related to our facilities will affect our business and financial results, including the following:

our ability to adjust production capacity in a timely fashion in response to changes in demand for our products;

the significant fixed costs of operating the facilities;

factory utilization rates;

our ability to qualify our facilities for new products and new technologies in a timely manner;

the availability of raw materials, the impact of the volatility of commodity pricing and tariffs imposed on raw materials, including substrates, gold, platinum and high purity source materials such as gallium, aluminum, arsenic, indium, silicon, phosphorous and palladium;


our manufacturing cycle times;

our manufacturing yields;

our ability to hire, train and manage qualified production personnel;

our compliance with applicable environmental and other laws and regulations; and

our ability to avoid prolonged periods of down-time in our facilities for any reason.

If we experience poor manufacturing yields, our operating results may suffer.

Our products have unique designs and are fabricated using multiple semiconductor process technologies that are highly complex. In many cases, our products are assembled in customized packages. Many of our products consist of multiple components in a single module and feature enhanced levels of integration and complexity. Our customers insist that our products be designed to meet their exact specifications for quality, performance and reliability. Our manufacturing yield is a combination of yields across the entire supply chain, including wafer fabrication, assembly and test yields. Defects in a single component in an assembled module product can impact the yield for the entire module, which means the adverse economic impacts of an individual defect can be multiplied many times over if we fail to discover the defect before the module is assembled. Due to the complexity of our products, we periodically experience difficulties in achieving acceptable yields and other quality issues, particularly with respect to new products.

Our customers test our products once they have been assembled into their products. The number of usable products that result from our production process can fluctuate as a result of many factors, including:

design errors;

minute impurities and variations in materials used;

contamination of the manufacturing environment;

equipment failure or variations in the manufacturing processes;

losses from broken wafers or other human error; and

defects in substrates and packaging.

We constantly seek to improve our manufacturing yields. Typically, for a given level of sales, when our yields improve, our gross margins improve, and when our yields decrease, our unit costs are higher, our margins are lower, and our operating results are adversely affected.

Costs of product defects and deviations from required specifications could include the following:

writing off inventory;

scrapping products that cannot be fixed;

accepting returns of products that have been shipped;

providing product replacements at no charge;

reimbursement of direct and indirect costs incurred by our customers in recalling or reworking their products due to defects in our products;

travel and personnel costs to investigate potential product quality issues and to identify or confirm the failure mechanism or root cause of product defects; and

defending against litigation.

These costs could be significant and could reduce our gross margins. Our reputation with customers also could be damaged as a result of product defects and quality issues, and product demand could be reduced, which could harm our business and financial results.


Industry overcapacity could cause us to underutilize our manufacturing facilities and have a material adverse effect on our financial performance.

It is difficult to predict future demand for our products, which makes it difficult to estimate future requirements for production capacity and avoid periods of overcapacity. Fluctuations in the growth rate of industry capacity relative to the growth rate in demand for our products also can lead to overcapacity and contribute to cyclicality in the semiconductor market.

Capacity expansion projects have long lead times and require capital commitments based on forecasted product trends and demand well in advance of production orders from customers. In recent years, we have made significant capital investments to expand our RF filter capacity to address forecasted future demand patterns. In certain cases, these capacity additions may exceed the near-term demand requirements, leading to overcapacity situations and underutilization of our manufacturing facilities.

As many of our manufacturing costs are fixed, these costs cannot be reduced in proportion to the reduced revenues experienced during periods of underutilization. Underutilization of our manufacturing facilities can adversely affect our gross margin and other operating results. If demand for our products experiences a prolonged decrease, we may be required to close or idle facilities and write down our long-lived assets or shorten the useful lives of underutilized assets and accelerate depreciation, which would increase our expenses.

We face intense competition, which may cause pricing pressures, decreased gross margins and loss of potential market share and may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

We will compete with U.S. and international semiconductor manufacturers and mobile semiconductor companies of all sizes in terms of resources and market share, some of whom have significantly greater financial, technical, manufacturing and marketing resources than we do. We expect competition in our markets to intensify as new competitors enter the RF component market, existing competitors merge or form alliances, and new technologies emerge. Our competitors may introduce new solutions and technologies that are superior to our BAW technology, are verified on a commercial scale, and have achieved widespread market acceptance. Certain of our competitors may be able to adapt more quickly than we can to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements or may be able to devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products than we can. This implementation may require us to modify the manufacturing process for our filters, design new products to more stringent standards, and redesign some existing products, which may prove difficult for us and result in delays in product deliveries and increased expenses.

  


Increased competition could also result in pricing pressures, declining average selling prices for our RF filters, decreased gross margins and loss of potential market share. We will need to make substantial investments to develop these enhancements and technologies, and we cannot assure investors that we will have funds available for these investments or that these enhancements and technologies will be successful. If a competing technology emerges that is, or is perceived to be, superior to our existing technology and we are unable to adapt to these changes and to compete effectively, our market share and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected, and our business, revenue, and results of operations could be harmed.

 

We may be subject to risks related to doing business in, and having counterparties based in, foreign countries.

We engage in operations, and enter into agreements with counterparties, located outside the U.S., which exposes us to political, governmental and economic instability and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.


Any disruption caused by these factors could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and prospects. Risks associated with potential operations, commitments and investments outside of the U.S. include but are not limited to risks of:

global and local economic, social and political conditions and uncertainty;
currency exchange restrictions and currency fluctuations;

war or terrorist attack;

renegotiation or nullification of existing contracts or international trade arrangements;

labor market conditions and workers’ rights affecting our manufacturing operations or those of our customers;

macro-economic conditions impacting key markets and sources of supply;

changing laws and policies affecting trade, taxation, financial regulation, immigration, and investment;

compliance with laws and regulations that differ among jurisdictions, including those covering taxes, intellectual property ownership and infringement, imports and exports, anti-corruption and anti-bribery, antitrust and competition, data privacy, and environment, health, and safety; and

general hazards associated with the assertion of sovereignty over areas in which operations are conducted, transactions occur, or counterparties are located.

As our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, any operations conducted outside the U.S. or transactions denominated in foreign currencies would face additional risks of fluctuating currency values and exchange rates, hard currency shortages and controls on currency exchange. In addition, we would be subject to the impact of foreign currency fluctuations and exchange rate changes on our financial reports when translating our assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses from operations or transactions outside of the U.S. into U.S. dollars at the then-applicable exchange rates. These translations could result in changes to our results of operations from period to period.

Economic regulation in China could adversely impact our business and results of operations.

A significant portion of our potential customer base is in China. For many years, the Chinese economy has experienced periods of rapid growth and wide fluctuations in the rate of inflation. In response to these factors, the Chinese government has, from time to time, adopted measures to regulate growth and to contain inflation, including currency controls and measures designed to restrict credit, control prices or set currency exchange rates. Such actions in the future, as well as other changes in Chinese laws and regulations, including actions in furtherance of China’s stated policy of reducing its dependence on foreign semiconductor manufacturers, could increase the cost of doing business in China, foster the emergence of Chinese-based competitors, decrease the demand for our products in China, or reduce the supply of critical materials for our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Changes in government trade policies, including the imposition of tariffs and export restrictions, could limit our ability to sell our products to certain customers, which may materially adversely affect our sales and results of operations.

The U.S. or foreign governments may take administrative, legislative or regulatory action that could materially interfere with our ability to sell products in certain countries, particularly in China. For example, between July 2018 and September 2019, the Office of the United States Trade Representative imposed 10% to 25% tariffs on specified product lists, including certain electronic components and equipment, totaling approximately $250 billion in Chinese imports. In response, China imposed or proposed new or higher tariffs on U.S. products. At this time, the U.S. government has announced it intends to increase the tariff rate on the approximately $250 billion in Chinese imports to 30%, effective October 1, 2019. The U.S. government also imposed a 15% tariff on an additional $325 billion of Chinese imports effective September 1, 2019 for certain specified products and December 15, 2019 for the remaining specified products. China has taken additional retaliatory actions, including an increase in tariffs applied to U.S. products effective September 1, 2019. China has also threatened further retaliatory actions, including additional tariff increases later in 2019. While the imposition of these tariffs did not have a direct, material adverse impact on our business during fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, the direct and indirect effects of tariffs and other restrictive trade policies are difficult to measure and are only one part of a larger U.S./China economic and trade policy disagreement.

For example, U.S. government actions targeting exports of certain technologies to China are becoming more pervasive. In 2018, the U.S. adopted new laws designed to address concerns about the export of emerging and foundational technologies to China. In addition, in May 2019, President Trump issued an executive order that invoked national emergency economic powers to implement a framework to regulate the acquisition or transfer of information communications technology in transactions that imposed undue national security risks. These actions could lead to additional restrictions on the export of products that include or enable certain technologies, including products we could potentially provide to China-based customers.

Furthermore, the imposition of tariffs on our potential customers’ products that are imported from China to the U.S. could harm sales of such products, which could indirectly harm our business. We cannot predict what actions may ultimately be taken with respect to tariffs or trade relations between the U.S. and China or other countries, what products may be subject to such actions, or what actions may be taken by the other countries in retaliation.


The loss or temporary loss of potential foreign customers or the imposition of restrictions on our ability to sell products to such customers as a result of tariffs, export restrictions or other U.S. regulatory actions could materially adversely affect our sales, business and results of operations.

Changes in general economic conditions, together with other factors, cause significant upturns and downturns in the industry, and our business, therefore, may also experience cyclical fluctuations in the future.

 

From time to time, changes in general economic conditions, together with other factors, may cause significant upturns and downturns in the semiconductor industry. These fluctuations are due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

 

 levels of inventory in our end markets,

 availability and cost of supply for manufacturing of our RF filters using our design,

 changes in end-user demand for the products manufactured with our technology and sold by our prospective customers,

 exposure to foreign currency exchange rates, import duties and tariffs,

 industry production capacity levels and fluctuations in industry manufacturing yields,

 market acceptance of our current and future customers’ products that incorporate our RF filters,

 the gain or loss of significant customers,

 the effects of competitive pricing pressures, including decreases in average selling prices of our RF filters,

 new product and technology introductions by competitors,

 changes in the mix of products produced and sold, and

 intellectual property disputes.

 

As a result, the demand for our products can change quickly and in ways we may not anticipate, and our business, therefore, may also experience cyclical fluctuations in future operating results. In addition, future downturns in the electronic systems industry could adversely impact our revenue and harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Security breaches and other disruptions could compromise our proprietary information and expose us to liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.

We rely on trade secrets, technical know-how and other unpatented proprietary information relating to our product development and manufacturing activities to provide us with competitive advantages. We protect this information by entering into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, strategic partners and other third parties. We also design our computer networks and implement various procedures to restrict unauthorized access to dissemination of our proprietary information.

We face internal and external data security threats. Current, departing or former employees or third parties could attempt to improperly use or access our computer systems and networks to copy, obtain or misappropriate our proprietary information or otherwise interrupt our business. Like others, we are also subject to significant system or network disruptions from numerous causes, including computer viruses and other cyber-attacks, facility access issues, new system implementations and energy blackouts.


Security breaches, computer malware, phishing, spoofing, and other cyber-attacks have become more prevalent and sophisticated in recent years. While we defend against these threats on a daily basis, we do not believe that such attacks to date have caused us any material damage. Because the techniques used by computer hackers and others to access or sabotage networks constantly evolve and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate, counter or ameliorate all of these techniques. As a result, our and our customers’ proprietary information may be misappropriated, and the impact of any future incident cannot be predicted. Any loss of such information could harm our competitive position, result in a loss of customer confidence in the adequacy of our threat mitigation and detection processes and procedures, cause us to incur significant costs to remedy the damages caused by the incident, and divert management and other resources. We routinely implement improvements to our network security safeguards and we are devoting increasing resources to the security of our information technology systems. We cannot, however, assure that such system improvements will be sufficient to prevent or limit the damage from any future cyber-attack or network disruption.

The costs related to cyber-attacks or other security threats or computer systems disruptions typically would not be fully insured or indemnified by others. Occurrence of any of the events described above could result in loss of competitive advantages derived from our R&D efforts or our intellectual property. Moreover, these events may result in the early obsolescence of our products, product development delays, or diversion of the attention of management and key information technology and other resources, or otherwise adversely affect our internal operations and reputation or degrade our financial results and stock price.

We may be subject to theft, loss, or misuse of personal data by or about our employees, customers or other third parties, which could increase our expenses, damage our reputation, or result in legal or regulatory proceedings.

In the ordinary course of our business, we have access to sensitive, confidential or personal data or information regarding our employees and others that is subject to privacy and security laws and regulations. The theft, loss, or misuse of personal data collected, used, stored, or transferred by us to run our business, or by our third party service providers, including business process software applications providers and other vendors that have access to sensitive data, could result in damage to our reputation, disruption of our business activities, significantly increased business and security costs or costs related to defending legal claims.

Global privacy legislation, enforcement, and policy activity in this area are rapidly expanding and creating a complex regulatory compliance environment. For example, the European Union has adopted the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which requires companies to comply with rules regarding the handling of personal data, including its use, protection and the ability of persons whose data is stored to correct or delete such data about themselves. Failure to meet GDPR requirements could result in penalties of up to 4% of worldwide revenue. In addition, the interpretation and application of consumer and data protection laws in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere are often uncertain and fluid, and may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our data practices. Complying with these changing laws has caused, and could continue to cause, us to incur substantial costs, which could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Further, failure to comply with existing or new rules may result in significant penalties or orders to stop the alleged non-compliant activity. Finally, even our inadvertent failure to comply with federal, state, or international privacy-related or data protection laws and regulations could result in audits, regulatory inquiries or proceedings against us by governmental entities or others.

Our business and operations would suffer in the event of system failures, and our operations are vulnerable to interruption by natural disasters, terrorist activity, power loss and other events beyond our control, the occurrence of which could materially harm our business.

Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems and those of our contractors and consultants are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, unauthorized access as well as telecommunication and electrical failures. While we have not experienced any such system failure, accident or security breach to date, if such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, it could result in a material disruption of our R&D. If any disruption or security breach resulted in a loss of or damage to our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability and/or the further development of our technology for RF filters could be delayed.

We are also vulnerable to accidents, electrical blackouts, labor strikes, terrorist activities, war and other natural disasters and other events beyond our control, and we have not undertaken a systematic analysis of the potential consequences to our business as a result of any such events and do not have an applicable recovery plan in place. We carry business interruption insurance that would compensate us for certain actual losses from interruptions of our business that may occur, however that may not fully cover all losses incurred, any losses or damages incurred could cause our business to materially suffer.

If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel to contribute to the development, manufacture and sale of our products, we may not be able to effectively operate our business.

 

As the source of our technological and product innovations, our key technical personnel represent a significant asset. We believe that our future success is highly dependent on the continued services of our current key officers, employees, and Board members, as well as our ability to attract and retain highly skilled and experienced technical personnel. The loss of their services could have a detrimental effect on our operations. Specifically, the  loss of the services of Jeffrey Shealy, our President and Chief Executive Officer, John Kurtzweil, our Interim Chief Financial Officer, David Aichele, our Vice President of Business Development, Richard Ogawa, our Special Legal Advisor,Chief Product Officer, any major changechanges in our Board or other senior management, or our inability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our business. The competition for management and technical personnel is intense in the wireless semiconductor industry, and therefore, we cannot assure you that we will be able to attract and retain qualified management and other personnel necessary for the design, development, manufacture and sale of our products.

    


Product defectsLitigation or legal proceedings, including product liability claims, could adversely affect the results of our operations and may expose us to product liability claims.significant liabilities, occupy a significant amount of our management’s time and attention and damage our reputation.

 

The fabricationWe are from time to time party to various litigation claims and legal proceedings. We evaluate these claims and proceedings to assess the likelihood of RF filters is a complexunfavorable outcomes and precise process.estimate, if possible, the amount of potential losses. If we or any of our manufacturers fails to successfully manufacture wafers that conform to our design specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FCC, it may result in substantial risk of undetected flaws in components or other materials used by our manufacturers during fabrication of our filters and could lead to product defects and costs to repair or replace these parts or materials. Any such failure wouldmaterials, significantly impactimpacting our ability to develop and implement our technology and to improve performance of our RF filters. Our inability to comply with such requirementsIn addition, claims made or threatened by our suppliers, customers or current or former employees could result in significant costs, as well as negative publicity andadversely affect our relationships, damage to our reputation thator otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. The costs associated with defending product liability and other claims, and the payment of damages, could reduce demand for our products.be substantial. Our reputation could also be adversely affected by such claims, whether or not successful.

 

We also could be subjectmay establish reserves as appropriate based upon assessments and estimates in accordance with our accounting policies in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We base our assessments, estimates and disclosures on the information available to product liability lawsuits ifus at the wireless devices containingtime and rely on legal and management judgment. Actual outcomes or losses may differ materially from assessments and estimates. Actual settlements, judgments or resolutions of these claims or proceedings may negatively affect our RF filters cause injury. Recently interest groups have requestedbusiness and financial performance. A successful claim against us that the FCC investigate claims that wireless communications technologies pose health concerns and cause interference with airbags, hearing aids and medical devices. Any such product liability claims may include allegations of defectsis not covered by insurance or is in manufacturing, defects in design, a failure to warn of dangers inherent in the product or inadequate disclosure of risks related to the useexcess of our product, negligence, strict liabilityavailable insurance limits could require us to make significant payments of damages and a breachcould materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of warranties. Claims could also be asserted under state consumer protection acts.operations and cash flows.

 

If we are unable to establish effective marketing and sales capabilities or enter into additional agreements with third parties to market and sell our RF filters, we may not be able to effectively generate and sustain or increase product revenues.

 

We have limited experience selling, marketing or distributing products and currently have a small internal marketing and sales force. In order toTo progress the launch and commercializecommercialization of our technology and our RF filters, we must build on a territory-by-territory basis marketing, sales, distribution, managerial and other non-technical capabilities or make arrangements with third parties to perform these services, and we may not be successful in doing so. Therefore, we may choose to collaborate, either globally or on a territory-by-territory basis, with third parties that have direct sales forces and established distribution systems, either to augment our own sales force and distribution systems or in lieu of our own sales force and distribution systems. If so, our success will depend, in part, on our ability to enter into and maintain collaborative relationships for such capabilities, such collaborator’s strategic interest in the products under development and such collaborator’s ability to successfully market and sell any such products.

 

If we are unable to enter into such arrangements when needed on acceptable terms or at all, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our filters. Further, to the extent that we depend on third parties for marketing and distribution, any revenues we receive will depend upon the efforts of such third parties, and there can be no assurance that such efforts will be successful. If we decide in the future to establish an internal sales and marketing team with technical expertise and supporting distribution capabilities to commercialize our RF filters, it could be expensive and time consuming and would require significant attention of our executive officers to manage. We may also not have sufficient resources to allocate to the sales and marketing of our filters. Any failure or delay in the development of sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, either through collaboration with one or more third parties or through internal efforts, would adversely impact the commercialization of any of our products that we obtain approval to market. As a result, our future product revenue would suffer, and we may incur significant additional losses.

  

Problems in scaling our manufacturing operations could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Future customer demand may require us to significantly increase our manufacturing capacity. There are substantial technical challenges to increasing manufacturing capacity, including equipment acquisition lead times, materials procurement, scaling our manufacturing process, manufacturing site expansion, and the need to significantly increase production yields while maintaining or improving quality control and assurance. Developing commercial-scale manufacturing facilities will require the investment of substantial additional funds and the hiring and retention of additional management, quality assurance, quality control and technical personnel who have the necessary manufacturing experience. The scaling of manufacturing capacity is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties and may lead to variability in product quality or reliability, increased construction timelines, as well as resources required to acquire, install and maintain manufacturing equipment, among others, all of which can lead to unexpected delays in manufacturing output. Additionally, the production of our products must occur in a highly controlled and clean environment to minimize particles and other yield- and quality-limiting contaminants. Weaknesses in process control or minute impurities in materials may cause a substantial percentage of defective products. We may not be able to maintain stringent quality controls and contamination problems could arise. Material defects in our products could result in loss or delay of revenues, delayed market acceptance, damage to our reputation, lost customers, legal claims, increased insurance costs or increased service and warranty costs. If we are unable to successfully scale up our manufacturing operations to meet customer demand, our business growth could be materially adversely affected.


We may engage in future acquisitions that could disrupt our business, cause dilution to our shareholders and harm our financial condition and operating results.

While we currently have no specific plans to acquire any other businesses, we may, in the future, make acquisitions of, or investments in, companies that we believe have products or capabilities that are a strategic or commercial fit with our current business or otherwise offer opportunities for our company. In connection with these acquisitions or investments, we may:

issue Common Stock or other forms of equity that would dilute our existing shareholders’ percentage of ownership,

incur debt and assume liabilities, and

incur amortization expenses related to intangible assets or incur large and immediate write-offs.

We may not be able to complete acquisitions on favorable terms, if at all. If we do complete an acquisition, we cannot assure you that it will ultimately strengthen our competitive position or that it will be viewed positively by customers, financial markets or investors. Furthermore, future acquisitions could pose numerous additional risks to our expected operations, including:

problems integrating the purchased business, products or technologies,

challenges in achieving strategic objectives, cost savings and other anticipated benefits,

increases to our expenses,

the assumption of significant liabilities that exceed the limitations of any applicable indemnification provisions or the financial resources of any indemnifying party,
inability to maintain relationships with prospective key customers, vendors and other business partners of the acquired businesses,

diversion of management’s attention from its day-to-day responsibilities,

difficulty in maintaining controls, procedures and policies during the transition and integration,

entrance into marketplaces where we have no or limited prior experience and where competitors have stronger marketplace positions,

potential loss of key employees, particularly those of the acquired entity, and

historical financial information may not be representative or indicative of our results as a combined company.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

 

If we fail to obtain, maintain and enforce our intellectual property rights, we may not be able to prevent third parties from using our proprietary technologies.

 

Our long-term success largely depends on our ability to market technologically competitive products which, in turn, largely depends on our ability to obtain and maintain adequate intellectual property protection and to enforce our proprietary rights without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties. While we rely upon a combination of our patent applications currently pending with the United State Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), our trademarks, copyrights, trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect the intellectual property related to our technologies, there can be no assurance thatthat:

   


 our currently pending or future patent applications will result in issued patents,

 our limited patent portfolio will provide adequate protection to our core technology,

 we will succeed in protecting our technology adequately in all key jurisdictions, or

 we will be able to finalize negotiations to enter into agreements pursuant to which we will license certain patents, or

 we can prevent third parties from disclosure or misappropriation of our proprietary information which could enable competitors to quickly duplicate or surpass our technological achievements, thus eroding any competitive advantage we may derive from the proprietary information.

 

In addition, we intend to expand our international presence, and effective patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret protection may not be available or may be limited in foreign countries.

 


We have a limited number of patent applications, which may not result in issued patents or patents that fully protect our intellectual property.

 

In the United States and internationally we have sixteen (16)had fifty-two pending patent applications;applications as of September 11, 2019; however, there is no assurance that any of the pending applications or our future patent applications will result in patents being issued, or that any patents that may be issued as a result of existing or future applications will provide meaningful protection or commercial advantage to us.

 

The process of seeking patent protection in the United States and abroad can be long and expensive. Since patent applications in the United States and most other countries are confidential for a period of time after filing, we cannot be certain at the time of filing that we are the first to file any patent application related to our single-crystal acoustic wave filter technology. In addition, patent applications are often published as part of the patent application process, even if such applications do not issue as patents. When published, such applications will become publicly available, and proprietary information disclosed in the application will become available to others. While at present we are unaware of competing patent applications, competing applications could potentially surface.

  

Even if all of our pending patent applications are granted and result in registration of our patents, we cannot predict the breadth of claims that may be allowed or enforced, or that the scope of any patent rights could provide a sufficient degree of protection that could permit us to gain or keep our competitive advantage with respect to these products and technologies. For example, we cannot predict:

 

 the degree and range of protection any patents will afford us against competitors, including whether third parties will find ways to make, use, sell, offer to sell or import competitive products without infringing our patents;

 if and when patents will be issued;

 if third parties will obtain patents claiming inventions similar to those covered by our patents and patent applications;

 if third parties have blocking patents that could be used to prevent us from marketing our own patented products and practicing our own technology; or

 whether we will need to initiate litigation or administrative proceedings (e.g. at the USPTO) in connection with patent rights, which may be costly whether we win or lose.

 

As a result, the patent applications we own may fail to result in issued patents in the United States. Third parties may challenge the validity, enforceability or scope of any issued patents or patents issued to us in the future, which may result in those patents being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable. Even if they are unchallenged, our patents and patent applications may not adequately protect our intellectual property or prevent others from developing similar products that do not infringe the claims made in our patents. If the breadth or strength of protection provided by the patents we hold or pursue is threatened, we may not be able to prevent others from offering similar technology and products in the RFFE mobile market and our ability to commercialize our RF filters with technology protected by those patents could be threatened.

   


If we fail to obtain issued patents outside of the United States, our ability to prevent misappropriation of our proprietary information or infringement of our intellectual property rights in countries outside of the United States where our filters may be sold in the future may be significantly limited. If we file foreign patent applications related to our pending U.S. patent applications or to our issued patents in the United States, these applications may be contested and fail to result in issued patents outside of the United States or we may be required to narrow our claims. Even if some or all of our patent applications are granted outside of the United States and result in issued patents, effective enforcement of rights granted by these patents in some countries may not be available due to the differences in foreign patent and other laws concerning intellectual property rights, a relatively weak legal regime protecting intellectual property rights in these countries, and because it is difficult, expensive and time-consuming to police unauthorized use of our intellectual property when infringers are overseas. This failure to obtain or maintain adequate protection of our intellectual property rights outside of the United States could have a materially adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial conditions.

 


We may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents, which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful.

 

Competitors may infringe our patents or the patents of our potential licensors. To attempt to stop infringement or unauthorized use, we may need to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time consuming and distract management.

 

If we pursue any infringement proceeding, a court may decide that a patent of ours or our licensors is not valid or is unenforceable or may refuse to stop the other party from using the relevant technology on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in question. Additionally, any enforcement of our patents may provoke third parties to assert counterclaims against us. Some of our current and potential competitors have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to enforcing their intellectual property rights than we have. Moreover, the legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents, which could reduce the likelihood of success of, or the amount of damages that could be awarded resulting from, any infringement proceeding we pursue in any such jurisdiction. An adverse result in any infringement litigation or defense proceedings could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated, held unenforceable, or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing, which could limit the ability of our filters to compete in those jurisdictions.

 

Interference proceedings could be provoked by third parties or brought by the USPTO to determine the priority of inventions with respect to our patents or patent applications. An unfavorable outcome could require us to cease using the related technology or to attempt to license rights to use it from the prevailing party. Our business could be harmed if the prevailing party does not offer us a license on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

 

We need to protect our trademark rights and disclosure of our trade secrets to prevent competitors from taking advantage of our goodwill.

 

We believe that the protection of our trademark rights is an important factor in product recognition, protecting our brand, maintaining goodwill, and maintaining or increasing market share. We currently have twofour trademarks that we have filed to register with the USPTO  - the Akoustis, XBAW and BulkONE®BulkONE marks and the XBAW logo - and we may expend substantial cost and effort in an attempt to register new trademarks and maintain and enforce our trademark rights. If we do not adequately protect our rights in our trademarks from infringement, any goodwill that we have developed in those trademarks could be lost or impaired.

 

Third parties may claim that the sale or promotion of our products, when and if we have any, may infringe on the trademark rights of others. Trademark infringement problems occur frequently in connection with the sale and marketing of products in the RFFE mobile industry. If we become involved in any dispute regarding our trademark rights, regardless of whether we prevail, we could be required to engage in costly, distracting and time-consuming litigation that could harm our business. If the trademarks we use are found to infringe upon the trademark of another company, we could be liable for damages and be forced to stop using those trademarks, and as result, we could lose all the goodwill that has been developed in those trademarks.

  


In addition to the protection afforded by patents and trademarks, we seek to rely on copyright, trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect proprietary know-how that is not patentable, processes for which patents are difficult to enforce and any other elements of our processes that involve proprietary know-how, information or technology that is not covered by patents. For Akoustis, this includes chip layouts, circuit designs, resonator layouts and implementation, and membrane definition. Although we require all of our employees and certain consultants and advisors to assign inventions to us, and all of our employees, consultants, advisors and any third parties who have access to our proprietary know-how, information or technology to enter into confidentiality agreements, our trade secrets and other proprietary information may be disclosed, or competitors may otherwise gain access to such information or independently develop substantially equivalent information. If we are unable to prevent material disclosure of the intellectual property related to our technologies to third parties, we will not be able to establish or maintain the competitive advantage that we believe is provided by such intellectual property, which would weaken our competitive market position, and materially adversely affect our business and operational results.

 


Development of certain technologies with our manufacturers may result in restrictions on jointly-developed intellectual property.

 

In order to maintain and expand our strategic relationship with manufacturers of our filters, we may, from time to time, develop certain technologies jointly with these manufacturers and file for further intellectual property protection and/or seek to commercialize such technologies. We may enter into joint development agreements with manufacturers to provide for joint development works and joint intellectual property rights by us and by such manufacturer. Such agreements may restrict our commercial use of such intellectual property, or may require written consent from, or a separate agreement with, that manufacturer. In other cases, we may not have any rights to use intellectual property solely developed and owned by such manufacturer or another third party. If we cannot obtain commercial use rights for such jointly-owned intellectual property or intellectual property solely owned by these manufacturers, our future product development and commercialization plans may be adversely affected.

  

We may be subject to claims of infringement, misappropriation or misuse of third party intellectual property that, regardless of merit, could result in significant expense and loss of our intellectual property rights.

 

The semiconductor industry is characterized by the vigorous pursuit and protection of intellectual property rights. We have not undertaken a comprehensive review of the rights of third parties in our field. From time to time, we may receive notices or inquiries from third parties regarding our products or the manner in which we conduct our business suggesting that we may be infringing, misappropriating or otherwise misusing patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret and other intellectual property rights. Any claims that our technology infringes, misappropriates or otherwise misuses the rights of third parties, regardless of their merit or resolution, could be expensive to litigate or settle and could divert the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel, cause significant delays and materially disrupt the conduct of our business. We may not prevail in such proceedings given the complex technical issues and inherent uncertainties in intellectual property litigation. If such proceedings result in an adverse outcome, we could be required to:

 

 pay substantial damages, including treble damages if we were held to have willfully infringed;

 cease the manufacture, offering for sale or sale of the infringing technology or processes;

 expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology or processes;

 obtain a license from a third party, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or may not be available at all; or

 lose the opportunity to license our technology to others or to collect royalty payments based upon successful protection and assertion of our intellectual property against others.

   


In addition, our agreements with prospective customers and manufacturing partners may require us to indemnify such customers and manufacturing partners for third party intellectual property infringement claims. Pursuant to such agreements, we may be required to defend such customers and manufacturing partners against certain claims that could cause us to incur additional costs. While we endeavor to include as part of such indemnification obligations a provision permitting us to assume the defense of any indemnification claim, not all of our current agreements contain such a provision and we cannot provide any assurance that our future agreements will contain such a provision, which could result in increased exposure to us in the case of an indemnification claim.

 

Defense of any intellectual property infringement claims against us, regardless of their merit, would involve substantial litigation expense and would be a significant diversion of resources from our business. In the event of a successful claim of infringement against us, we may have to pay substantial damages, obtain one or more licenses from third parties, limit our business to avoid the infringing activities, pay royalties and/or redesign our infringing technology or alter related formulations, processes, methods or other technologies, any or all of which may be impossible or require substantial time and monetary expenditure. The occurrence of any of the above events could prevent us from continuing to develop and commercialize our filters and our business could materially suffer.

 


Risks Related to our Financial Condition

 

We have a history of losses, will need substantial additional funding to continue our operations and may not achieve or sustain profitability in the future.

 

Our operations have consumed substantial amounts of cash since inception. We have incurred losses since our incorporation and formation in 2014. Although our newly acquired STC-MEMS Business has a potential revenue stream estimation of $1.5 million in the current fiscal year, (which are not guaranteed), and although we plan to apply for additional grants in the calendar years 2017 and 2018, we do not expect meaningful revenues from our resonator technology until at least the first half of the calendar year 2018. There is no guarantee that the grants we apply for will be awarded to us, and if our forecasts for the Company prove incorrect, the business, operating results and financial condition of the Company will be materially and adversely affected. We anticipate that our operating expenses will increase in the foreseeable future as we continue to pursue the development of our patent-pending single-crystalhigh purity single crystal acoustic wave filter technology, invest in marketing, sales and distribution of our RF filters to grow our business, acquire customers, commercialize our technology in the mobile wireless market and continue the transition ofto invest in our manufacturing to our STC-MEMS Business.facility in Canandaigua, NY. These efforts may prove more expensive than we currently anticipate, and we may not succeed in generating sufficient revenues to offset these higher expenses. In addition, we expect to incur significant expenses related to regulatory requirements and our ability to obtain, protect, and defend our intellectual property rights.

  

We may also encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown factors that may increase our capital needs and/or cause us to spend our cash resources faster than we expect. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in order to continue our operations.

 

To date, we have financed our operations through a mix of investments from private investors, public offerings of Common Stock, the incurrence of debt, foundry services revenue, RF filter revenue, and grant funding, and we expect to continue to utilize such means of financing for the foreseeable future. Additional funding from those or other sources may not be available when or in the amounts needed, on acceptable terms, or at all. If we raise additional capital through the sale of equity, or securities convertible into equity, it would result in dilution to our then existing stockholders, which could be significant depending on the price at which we may be able to sell our securities. If we raise additional capital through the incurrence of indebtedness, such as our issuance of senior convertible notes in May and October 2018, we would likelymay become subject to additional covenants restricting our business activities, and holders of debt instruments may have rights and privileges senior to those of our equity investors. In addition, servicing the interest and principal repayment obligations under debt facilities could divert funds that would otherwise be available to support research and development, or commercialization activities. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate the production and sale of our RF filter products, our R&D programs for our acoustic wave filter technology or any future commercialization efforts. Any of these events could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and prospects, and could cause our business to fail.

  


Servicing our debt requires a significant amount of cash or Common Stock, and we may not have sufficient cash flow from our business or have the ability to issue the necessary number of shares of Common Stock to pay our substantial debt.

Pursuant to the convertible note offerings we completed in the calendar year 2018, we incurred $25.0 million of indebtedness. This level of debt could have significant consequences on future operations, including:

increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions;

making it more difficult for us to meet our payment and other obligations;

making it more difficult to obtain any necessary future financing for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements or other purposes;

requiring the dedication of a substantial portion of any cash flow from operations to service our indebtedness, thereby reducing the amount of cash flow available for other purposes, including capital expenditures;

placing us at a possible competitive disadvantage with competitors that are less leveraged than us or have better access to capital than we have; and

limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the markets in which we compete.

Accrued interest on our October 2018 6.5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023 is payable quarterly in cash and we have the ability, at our option, to pay accrued interest on our May 2018 6.5% Convertible Senior Secured Notes due 2023 in cash or freely tradable shares of Common Stock. Our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed doubt aboutability to make scheduled payments of interest depends on our future performance, which is subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. Our business may not generate cash flow from operations in the future sufficient to service our debt in cash and make necessary capital expenditures. Furthermore, we may not issue Common Stock to make payments of interest to the extent such issuance would violate Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5635(d), which limits the amount of Common Stock that we may privately issue without prior stockholder approval. Therefore, our ability to continue as a going concern.repay debt with Common Stock will depend on the capital markets and whether we have obtained stockholder approval for such issuances of Common Stock.

 

TheIf we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow or issue Common Stock to satisfy payment obligations under our convertible notes, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as selling assets or obtaining additional equity capital on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive. We may not be able to engage in any of these activities or engage in these activities on desirable terms, which could result in a default on our debt obligations.

Furthermore, our $15.0 million principal amount of 6.5% Convertible Senior Secured Notes due 2023 are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s historical financial statements have been prepared underand the assumption thatCompany’s existing and future subsidiaries’ assets. Therefore, if we will continue asdefault on any of our debt obligations, it could result in our noteholders foreclosing on our assets. In such an event, the noteholders’ rights to such assets would likely be superior to those of our stockholders.

23

We are subject to a going concern. Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued a report that included an explanatory paragraph referringnumber of restrictive covenants, relating to our recurring net lossesindebtedness, which may restrict our business and accumulated deficitfinancing activities. Additionally, certain of our indebtedness is secured by a first priority lien on our and expressing substantial doubt in our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent uponsubsidiaries assets’, which may limit our ability to obtain additional equity financingfinancing.

The indentures governing our convertible notes imposes operating and other restrictions on us. Such restrictions may affect, and in many respects limit or prohibit, among other capital, attain further operating efficiencies, reduce expenditures, and, ultimately, to generate revenue. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. However, if adequate funds are not available to us when we need them, and we are unable to commercialize our products giving us access to additional cash resources, we will be required to curtail our operations, which would, in turn, further raise substantial doubt aboutthings, our ability to continue as a going concern.to:

 

Risk Related to Managing Any Growth We May Experience

We may engage in future acquisitions that could disrupt our business, cause dilution to our shareholders and harm our financial condition and operating results.

While we currently have no specific plans to acquire any other businesses, we may, in the future, make acquisitions of, or investments in, companies that we believe have products or capabilities that are a strategic or commercial fit with our current business or otherwise offer opportunities for our company. In connection with these acquisitions or investments, we may:

incur or guarantee additional indebtedness;

 

 issue Common Stockpreferred stock or other formsstock of equity that would dilute our existing shareholders’ percentage of ownership,
any subsidiary;
incur debt and assume liabilities, and
incur amortization expenses related to intangible assets or incur large and immediate write-offs.

We may not be able to complete acquisitions on favorable terms, if at all. If we do complete an acquisition, we cannot assure you that it will ultimately strengthen our competitive position or that it will be viewed positively by customers, financial markets or investors. Furthermore, future acquisitions could pose numerous additional risks to our expected operations, including:

 

 problems integrating the purchased business, productsmake investments or technologies,
acquisitions;

 challenges in achieving strategic objectives, cost savings and other anticipated benefits,
merge, consolidate, dissolve or liquidate;

 increases toengage in certain asset sales (including the sale of stock of our expenses,
subsidiary);

 the assumption of significant liabilities that exceed the limitations of any applicable indemnification provisions or the financial resources of any indemnifying party,
grant liens (except permitted liens);

 inability to maintain relationships with prospective key customers, vendors and other business partners of the acquired businesses,
pay dividends;

 diversion of management’s attention from its day-to-day responsibilities,engage in transactions with our affiliates; and

 difficulty in maintaining controls, procedures and policies during the transition and integration,
entranceenter into marketplaces where we have no or limited prior experience and where competitors have stronger marketplace positions,
potential lossa new line of key employees, particularly those of the acquired entity, and
historical financial information may not be representative or indicative of our results as a combined company.business.

 

OurThe restrictions in the indentures governing the convertible notes may prevent us from taking actions that we believe would be in the best interests of our business, and operations would suffermay make it difficult for us to successfully execute our business strategy or effectively compete with companies that are not similarly restricted. We also may incur future debt obligations that might subject us to additional restrictive covenants that could affect our financial and operational flexibility. Our ability to comply with these covenants in future periods will largely depend on the eventpricing of system failures,our products and services, and our operationsability to successfully implement our overall business strategy. We cannot assure you that we will be granted waivers or amendments to these agreements if for any reason we are vulnerableunable to interruption by natural disasters, terrorist activity, power losscomply with these agreements. The breach of any of these covenants and other events beyond our control, the occurrence of which could materially harm our business.

Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems and those of our contractors and consultants are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, unauthorized access as well as telecommunication and electrical failures. While we have not experienced any such system failure, accident or security breach to date, if such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, itrestrictions could result in a material disruptiondefault under the indenture governing the promissory notes, which could result in an acceleration of our R&D. If any disruptionindebtedness.

Additionally, potential lenders or security breach resultedother sources of capital may be less likely to extend financing to us due to their interests’ potential subordination to the first priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s and the Company’s existing and future subsidiaries’ assets securing the Company’s $15.0 million principal amount of convertible notes issued in a lossMay 2018.


Risks Related to Regulatory Requirements

Government regulation may adversely affect our business.

The effects of or damageregulation may materially and adversely impact our business. For example, regulatory policies of the FCC relating to our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosureradio frequency emissions, consumer protection laws of confidential or proprietary information, wethe FTC, product safety regulatory activities of the Consumer Products Safety Commission, and environmental regulatory activities of the EPA could incur liability and/or the further developmentimpede sales of our technology for RF filters could be delayed.

products in the United States. We and our customers are also vulnerablesubject to accidents, electrical blackouts, labor strikes, terrorist activities, warvarious import and other natural disastersexport laws and other events beyond our control, andregulations. If we have not undertaken a systematic analysis of the potential consequencesfail to our business as a result of any such events and do not have an applicable recovery plan in place. We currently do not carry other business interruption insurance that would compensate us for actual losses from interruptions of our business that may occur, and any losses or damages incurred by us could cause our businesscontinue to materially suffer.

Wecomply with these regulations, we may be unable to successfully integratemanufacture the STC-MEMS Business with our current operationsaffected products or ship these products to certain customers and strategic business plan.be subject to investigations, sanctions, mandatory product recalls, enforcement actions, disgorgement of profits, fines, damages, civil and criminal penalties, or injunctions.

 

We willAs described above under the risk factor entitled “We may be requiredsubject to devote significant management attentionrisks related to doing business in, and resources,having counterparties based in, foreign countries,” our business is also increasingly subject to complex foreign and U.S. laws and regulations, including expensesbut not limited to, integratinganti-corruption laws, such as the STC-MEMS Business with our current operationsForeign Corrupt Practices Act and to developing the integrated operationsequivalent laws in accordance with our strategic business plan. There is no guaranteeother jurisdictions, antitrust or competition laws, and data privacy laws, among others. Foreign governments may also impose tariffs, duties and other import restrictions on components that we will maintain existing customer/other relationshipsobtain from non-domestic suppliers and may impose export restrictions on products that we sell internationally. These tariffs, duties or the revenue stream of the STC-MEMS Business. We may fail to realize some or all of the anticipated benefits of the acquisition of the STC-MEMS Business if the integrationrestrictions could materially and development process takes longer than expected or is costlier than expected.  Such failure may have a material adverse effect onadversely affect our stock price, business, plan of operation,financial condition and results of operations.

 

Risks Related to Regulatory RequirementsOur product or manufacturing standards could also be impacted by new or revised environmental rules and regulations or other social initiatives. Those rules, or similar rules that may be adopted in other jurisdictions, could adversely affect our costs, the availability of minerals used in our products and our relationships with customers and suppliers.

 

We could fail to maintain our Trusted Foundry accreditation in our New York Fabrication Facility.

Although our New York fabrication facility has not generated any revenue to date from its Trusted Foundry accreditation, a failure to maintain that accreditation in the future could hamper our ability to generate product and foundry services revenue related to potential Aerospace and Defense customers.


We may incur substantial expenses in connection with regulatory requirements, and any regulatory compliance failure could cause our business to suffer.

 

The wireless communications industry is subject to ongoing regulatory obligations and review. See “Business - Government Regulations” above. Maintaining compliance with these requirements may result in significant additional expense to us, and any failure to maintain such compliance could cause our business to suffer.

 

Noncompliance with applicable regulations or requirements could also subject us to investigations, sanctions, mandatory product recalls, enforcement actions, disgorgement of profits, fines, damages, civil and criminal penalties, or injunctions. An adverse outcome in any such litigation could require us to pay contractual damages, compensatory damages, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. These enforcement actions could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. If any governmental sanctions are imposed, or if we do not prevail in any possible civil or criminal litigation, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, responding to any action will likely result in a significant diversion of management’s attention and resources and an increase in professional fees.

 

Compliance with regulations regarding the use of “conflict minerals” could limit the supply and increase the cost of certain metals used in manufacturing our products.

 

Regulations in the United States require that we determine whether certain materials used in our products, referred to as conflict minerals, originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or adjoining countries, or originated from recycled or scrap sources. We anticipate that we will first be required to comply with the SEC’s conflict minerals rules for the 2017 calendar year, and we expect to incur costs associated with implementingour policies and procedures to comply with the applicable rules and due diligence procedures. In addition, the verification and reporting requirements could affect the sourcing and availability of minerals that are used in the manufacture of our products, and we may face reputational and competitive challenges if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins of all conflict minerals used in our products. We may also face challenges with government regulators, potential customers, suppliers and manufacturers if we are unable to sufficiently verify that the metals used in our products are conflict free.

 

There could be an adverse change or increase in the laws and/or regulations governing our business.

 

We and our operating subsidiary are subject to various laws and regulations in different jurisdictions, and the interpretation and enforcement of laws and regulations are subject to change. We are also will be subject to different tax regulations in each of the jurisdictions where we will conduct our business or where our management or the management of our operating subsidiary is located. We expect that the scope and extent of regulation in these jurisdictions, as well as regulatory oversight and supervision, will generally continue to increase. There can be no assurance that future regulatory, judicial and legislative changes in any jurisdiction will not have a material adverse effect on us or hinder us in the operation of our business. In addition, we may incur substantial costs in order to comply with current or future environmental, health and safety laws and regulations applicable to us.

 

These current or future laws and regulations may impair our research, development or production efforts or impact the research activities we pursue. Our failure to comply with these laws and regulations also may result in substantial fines, penalties or other sanctions, which could cause our financial condition to suffer.


Investment Risks

 

You could lose all of your investment.

 

An investment in our securities is speculative and involves a high degree of risk. Potential investors should be aware that the value of an investment in the Company may go down as well as up. In addition, there can be no certainty that the market value of an investment in the Company will fully reflect its underlying value. You


The value of our Common Stock could lose your entire investment.be volatile.

 

The overall market and the price of our Common Stock may fluctuate greatly. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, our Common Stock traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market as high as $9.50 and as low as $3.40 per share. An active, liquid and orderly market for our Common Stock may not be sustained, which could depress the trading price of our Common Stock. The trading price of our Common Stock may be significantly affected by various factors, including quarterly fluctuations in our operating results, changes in investors’ and analysts’ perception of the business risks and conditions of our business, issuance of additional shares in connections with strategic transactions or acquisitions we may make, our ability to meet the earnings estimates and other performance expectations of financial analysts or investors, unfavorable commentary or downgrades of our stock by equity research analysts, and general economic or political conditions.

Our stock trades in low volumes, which may make it more difficult for investors to sell their shares quickly.

 

Our Common Stock trades on the Nasdaq Capital Market, but it trades in low volumes, which may make it more difficult for investors to sell their shares quickly. This situation may be attributable to a number of factors, including but not limited to the fact that we are a development-stagean emerging commercial company that is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers,stockbrokers, institutional investors, and others in the investor community. In addition, investors may be risk averse to investments in development-stageemerging commercial companies. As a consequence, it may be more difficult for investors to sell their shares quickly and our stock price may be more sensitive to sales of our Common Stock in the market. The low trading volume is outside of our control and may not increase or, if it increases, may not be maintained.

 

YouStockholders may experience dilution of yourtheir ownership interests because of the future issuance of additional shares of our commonCommon Stock or preferred stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for our commonCommon Stock or preferred stock, including as a result of triggering price protection rights held by certain investors.stock.

 

In the future, we may issue our authorized but previously unissued equity securities, resulting in the dilution of the ownership interests of our stockholders. The Company is authorized to issue an aggregate of 45,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock.Preferred Stock. We may issue additional shares of our Common Stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for our Common Stock in connection with hiring or retaining employees, future acquisitions, future sales of our securities for capital raising purposes, or for other business purposes. In addition, as of September 8, 2017,06, 2019, warrants and options to purchase 602,632633,343 and 160,0002,080,665 shares, respectively, of our Common Stock remained outstanding. In addition, investors in the 2017 Offering (as defined under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Financing Activities” below) have certain price protection rights. Pursuant to such rights, if we issue shares ofAdditionally, our Common Stock (subject to customary exceptions, including issuances of awards under Company employee stock incentive programs and certain issuances in connection with credit arrangements) at a price less than $9.00 per share, investors in the 2017 Offering will be entitled to receive (for no additional consideration) additional shares of our Common Stock in an amount such that, when added to the number ofoutstanding convertible senior notes were convertible into approximately 4.96 million shares of Common Stock they initially purchased in the 2017 Offering, will equal the number of shares of Common Stock that their investment in the 2017 Offering would have purchased at the lower purchase price.on such date. The future issuance of additional shares of our Common Stock may create downward pressure on the trading price of the Common Stock. We will need to raise additional capital in the near future to meet our working capital needs, and there can be no assurance that we will not be required to issue additional shares, warrants or other convertible securities in the future in conjunction with these capital raising efforts, including at a price (or exercise prices) below the price you paid for your stock.

 

TheDelaware law, our charter documents, the ability of our Board of Directors to issue additional stock, and certain provisions of our convertible notes could impede or discourage a takeover or change of control that stockholders may consider favorable.

As a Delaware corporation, we are subject to certain anti-takeover provisions. Under Delaware law, a corporation may not engage in a business combination with any holder of 15 percent or more of its capital stock unless the holder has held the stock for three years or, among other things, the board of directors has approved the transaction. Accordingly, our Board of Directors could rely on Delaware law to prevent or delay an acquisition of our company. In addition, certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or changes in our management. These provisions include only our Board of Directors being able to fill vacancies on the Board and various limitations in our bylaws on stockholder meeting, including advance notice requirements for stockholders to make more difficult certain transactions, includingnominations of candidates for election as directors or to bring matters before an annual meeting of stockholders and our stockholders not having the ability to call a sale or merger of the Company.special meeting.

 


Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with powers, rights and preferences designated by it. Shares of voting or convertible preferred stock could be issued, or rights to purchase such shares could be issued, to create voting impediments or to frustrate persons seeking to effect a takeover or otherwise gain control of the Company. The ability of the Board to issue such additional shares of preferred stock, with rights and preferences it deems advisable, could discourage an attempt by a party to acquire control of the Company by tender offer or other means. Such issuances could therefore deprive stockholders of benefits that could result from such an attempt, such as the realization of a premium over the market price for their shares in a tender offer or the temporary increase in market price that such an attempt could cause. Moreover, the issuance of such additional shares of preferred stock to persons friendly to the Board of Directors could make it more difficult to remove incumbent managers and directors from office even if such change were to be favorable to stockholders generally.

 

Certain provisions of the $15.0 million and $10.0 million principal amounts of convertible notes we issued in May 2018 and October 2018, respectively, could make it more difficult or more expensive for a third party to acquire us. If the Company undergoes a “qualifying fundamental change,” as such term is defined in the respective indentures for the notes, under certain circumstances holders who convert their notes in connection with such a qualifying fundamental change will be entitled to a “qualifying fundamental change payment” equal to $130 per $1,000 of aggregate principal of notes converted.  In addition, the indentures and the convertible notes prohibit us from engaging in certain mergers or acquisitions unless, among other things, the surviving entity assumes our obligations under the convertible notes and the indenture.  These and other provisions in the indentures could deter or prevent a third party from acquiring the Company.

These types of provisions could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us, even if the acquisition would be beneficial to our stockholders.

Our bylaws provide, subject to certain exceptions, that a state or federal court in the State of North Carolina will be the sole and exclusive forum for certain stockholder litigation matters, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, employees or stockholders.

Our bylaws provide, subject to limited exceptions, that a state or federal court located within the State of North Carolina will be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceedings brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee of the Company to the Company or the our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law or (iv) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our Common Stock shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the provisions of our bylaws described above. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, other employees or stockholders which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision that is contained in our bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We do not anticipate paying dividends on our Common Stock.

 

Cash dividends have never been declared or paid on our Common Stock, and we do not anticipate such a declaration or payment for the foreseeable future. We expect to use future earnings, if any, to fund business growth. Therefore, stockholders will not receive any funds absent a sale of their shares of Common Stock. If we do not pay dividends, our Common Stock may be less valuable because a return on your investment will only occur if our stock price appreciates. We cannot assure stockholders that our stock price will appreciate or that they will receive a positive return on their investment if and when they sell their shares.

 


WeAs a smaller reporting company, we are an emerging growth company, and the reducedsubject to scaled disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our Common Stock less attractive to investors.

We are an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we intend to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies including, but not limited to, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory stockholder vote on executive compensation and any golden parachute payments not previously approved, exemption from the requirement of auditor attestation in the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting and exemption from any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. If we do, the information that we provide stockholders may be different than what is available with respect to other public companies. We cannot predict if investors will find our Common Stock less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our Common Stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our Common Stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected to take advantage of this extended transition period. Since we will not be required to comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for other public companies, our financial statements may not be comparable to the financial statements of companies that comply with the effective dates of those accounting standards.

We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (1) the end of the fiscal year in which the market value of our Common Stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the end of the second fiscal quarter, (2) the end of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenues of $1.07 billion or more during such fiscal year, (3) the date on which we issue more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt in a three-year period or (4) June 30, 2019, the end of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of the first sale of our common stock pursuant to an effective registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Decreased disclosures in our SEC filings due to our status as an “emerging growth company” may make it hardermore challenging for investors to analyze our results of operations and financial prospects.

 

Even after we no longer qualify as an emerging growthAs a smaller reporting company, we are subject to scaled disclosure requirements that may still qualify asmake it more challenging for investors to analyze our results of operations and financial prospects. As a “smaller reporting company,” which would allow uswe may elect to provide simplified executive compensation disclosures in our filings and take advantage of many ofother decreased disclosure obligations in our filings with the same exemptions from disclosure requirements,SEC, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirementsprovide only two years of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation. Some investors may findaudited financial statements in our Common Stock less attractive because we rely on these exemptions, there may be a less active trading market for our Common Stock and our stock priceannual reports. Consequently, it may be more volatile.challenging for investors to analyze our results of operations and financial prospects. We will remain a smaller reporting company until the beginning of a fiscal year in which we have a public float of $250 million held by non-affiliates as of  the last business day of the second quarter of the prior fiscal year, assuming our common stock is registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act on the applicable evaluation date.

  


Being a public company is expensive and administratively burdensome.

 

As a public reporting company, we are subject to the information and reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and other federal securities laws, rules and regulations related thereto, including compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Complying with these laws and regulations requires the time and attention of our Board of Directors and management and increases our expenses. Among other things, we are required to:

 

 maintain and evaluate a system of internal control over financial reporting in compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the related rules and regulations of the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board;

 maintain policies relating to disclosure controls and procedures;

 prepare and distribute periodic reports in compliance with our obligations under federal securities laws;

 institute a more comprehensive compliance function, including with respect to corporate governance; and

 involve, to a greater degree, our outside legal counsel and accountants in the above activities.

 

The costs of preparing and filing annual and quarterly reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC and furnishing audited reports to stockholders is expensive and much greater than that of a privately-held company, and compliance with these rules and regulations may require us to hire additional financial reporting, internal controls and other finance personnel, and will involve a material increase in regulatory, legal and accounting expenses and the attention of management. There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the applicable regulations in a timely manner, if at all. In addition, being a public company makes it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance. In the future, we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain this coverage. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified executives and members of our Board of Directors, particularly directors willing to serve on the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.

If we fail to remediate the identified material weakness and maintain effective controls and procedures, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial condition, and the price of our Common Stock.

We are required to maintain disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to include in our annual reports on Form 10-K an assessment by management of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. As disclosed in Item 9A of this Report, our management identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, causing our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting to be ineffective as of June 30, 2017. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Remediation of the material weakness will require management attention and cause the Company to incur additional expenses. If we fail to remediate the material weakness, or if we are unable to maintain effective controls and procedures in the future, our ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information accurately and within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC could be adversely affected, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, and we may be subject to investigation or sanctions by the SEC. Any such consequence or other negative effect could adversely affect our operations, financial condition, and the price of our Common Stock.

In addition, at such time, if any, as we are no longer a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company, our independent registered public accounting firm will have to attest to and report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. If and when we are required to have our independent registered public accounting firm attest to management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, if our independent registered public accounting firm is not satisfied with the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, or if the independent auditors interpret the requirements, rules, or regulations differently than we do, then they may decline to attest to management’s assessment or may issue a report that is qualified. Any of these events could result in a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which could negatively affect the price of our Common Stock.


ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

None.

 

ITEM 2.PROPERTIES

 

Our current headquarters in Huntersville, NC, is a 4,800-square foot facility that we lease for base rent of $4,700 per month, with a term expiring in April 2018; however, due to increased headcount hired to support business operations in North Carolina, we have executed a new 60-month lease for an adjoining facility which is expected to commence on or about November 1, 2017. The new facility is 10,400 square feet, and its base rent is $9,800$9,880 per month.month with a term expiring December 2022. The currentprior headquarters, a 4,800-square foot facility, will bewas vacated at the commencement of the new lease.in April 2018. On June 26, 2017, the Company acquired a 120,000 square foot MEMS fabrication facility in Canandaigua, New York.York, which currently houses 46 employees (the “NY Facility”). In connection with the offering and sale of senior secured convertible notes on May 14, 2018, the Company granted a first priority lien to The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. on substantially all of its current and future assets, including a mortgage on the NY facility houses approx. 35 employeesFacility. Additionally, the Company has entered into a Lease and is only 15% utilized.Project Agreement and a Company Lease Agreement with the Ontario County Industrial Development Agency, a public benefit corporation of the State of New York (the “OCIDA”), covering the NY Facility, pursuant to which the Company leases the NY Facility to the OCIDA for nominal consideration and the OCIDA leases the NY Facility back to the Company for annual rent payments set forth in such agreements. The Company believes the newits 10,400-square foot facility in Huntersville, NC, once occupied, along with the recently acquired facility in New YorkNY Facility, will be suitable and sufficient to meet the Company’s needs for the next three to fiveseveral years.


ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in any such matters may arise from time to time that may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

 

WeExcept as noted below, we are currently not aware of any material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or of which any of our property is the subject, nor are we aware of any such proceedings that are contemplated by any governmental authority.

During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company ended the employment of its principal financial officer, John T. Kurtzweil (the “Former CFO”). The Former CFO’s employment was terminated for cause pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement by unanimous vote of the Company’s Board of Directors, and not due to any disagreement concerning the Company’s financial statements, accounting policies or accounting practices. The Former CFO disputes the termination for cause and has since filed for an arbitration hearing pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, and has filed a complaint under the whistleblower provisions of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration of the U.S. Department of Labor, alleging that his termination constituted retaliation by the Company for raising Regulation FD-related concerns. The Former CFO seeks lost wages and severance pay, including compensation for his forfeited equity awards, as well as attorney’s fees, interest, costs and punitive damages.

 

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

Not applicable.

 


PART II

 

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

  

Market Information and Holders

 

Our Common Stock is currently traded on the NASDAQNasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “AKTS.” Prior to March 13, 2017, our Common Stock was quoted on the OTC Market (OTCQB) under the same symbol. There has been limited trading in our Common Stock to date.

 

As of September 8, 2017, 19,084,5836, 2019, 30,329,525 shares of our Common Stock were issued and outstanding and were held by approximately 151156 stockholders of record.

 

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices (or closing bid prices with respect to periods prior to March 13, 2017) for our Common Stock for the fiscal quarters indicated, as reported on NASDAQ (or on OTC Markets with respect to closing bids for periods prior to March 13, 2017). OTC Market quotations for periods prior to March 13, 2017 reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

Period  High  Low 
        
Quarter ended September 30, 2015  $5.00  $2.75 
Quarter ended December 31, 2015   4.15   1.55 
Quarter ended March 31, 2016   2.00   1.50 
Quarter ended June 30, 2016   4.40   1.90 
Quarter ended September 30, 2016   4.49   3.50 
Quarter ended December 31, 2016   5.85   3.91 
Quarter ended March 31, 2017   12.90   5.44 
Quarter ended June 30, 2017   12.21   8.40 

Dividends

 

We have never paid any dividends on our capital stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our Common Stock in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain future earnings to fund ongoing operations and future capital requirements. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent upon financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant.

 


Warrants and Options

 

As of June 30, 2017,2019, there were outstanding warrants and options to purchase 612,165633,433 shares of our Common Stock and 160,0002,127,317 shares of our Common Stock, respectively. There are no other outstanding convertible securities of the Company.

 


Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

The following table provides information as of June 30, 2017,2019, relating to our equity compensation plans, under which grants of options, restricted stock, and other equity awards may be made from time to time:

 

Plan category Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
  Weighted-
average exercise
price of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
  Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a)
 
  (a)  (b)  (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  160,000(1) $1.50   2,728,000(2)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders         
             
Total  160,000(1)      2,728,000(2)

Plan category Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights  Weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights  Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a) 
  (a)  (b)  (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders - options  2,127,317(1) $5.57   1,865,035(3)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders – restricted stock units  1,196,882(2) $0.00      ‒  
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders     ‒       ‒       ‒  
             
Total  3,324,199       1,865,035(3)

 

(1)TheConsists of 160,000 shares of Common Stock to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options are issuable under the Company’s 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”), 1,062,859 issuable under the Company’s 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”) and 904,458 issuable under the Company’s 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”).

 

(2)Consists of 694,500 shares of Common Stock to be issued upon the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units issuable under the 2016 Plan (the “2016 Plan”) and 502,382 issuable under the 2018 Plan.

(3)As of June 30, 2017, 2,728,0002019, 1,865,035 additional shares of Common Stock remained available for future issuance under the Company’s 2016 Stock Incentive2018 Plan. No additional grants will be made under the Company’s 2014 Stock Plan (the “2014 Plan”), the 2015 Plan or the 20152016 Plan.

 

Recent salesSales of unregistered securitiesUnregistered Securities

 

We have not sold any equity securities during the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172019 that were not registered under the Securities Act, other than as previously reported in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and our Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.

 

Purchases of Equity SecuritiesRepurchases

 

Unvested restricted stock grants awardedawards granted under the 2014 Plan and the 2015 Plan are subject to Company repurchase options upon certain terminations of the respective recipient’s service with the Company. Under the terms of the respective award agreements, repurchases will generally be made for no value or for par value. As of June 30, 2017, 1,352,265,2019, 157,500 shares of restricted stock remained subject to repurchase options which are scheduled tothat expire between January 2018 and Decemberas the restricted shares vest generally through August 2020. We did not repurchase anyrepurchased 21,125 shares of our equity securities pursuant to these repurchase options or otherwise during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.2019.

Transfer Agent

The transfer agent for our Common Stock is Globex Transfer, LLC. The transfer agent’s address is 780 Deltona Blvd., Suite 202, Deltona, FL 32725 and its telephone number is 813-344-4490.

 

ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.

applicable.


ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the historical financial statements and the related notes thereto contained in this Report.Annual Report on Form 10-K. See also the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information” on page 1[1] of this Report.

 

The following discussion highlights the results of operations and the principal factors that have affected our financial condition, as well as our liquidity and capital resources for the periods described, and provides information that management believes is relevant for an assessment and understanding of the statements of financial condition and results of operations presented herein. The following discussion and analysis are based on the audited financial statements contained in this Report, which we have prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. You should read the discussion and analysis together with such financial statements and the related notes thereto.


Overview and Plan of Operation

 

Akoustis

Akoustis® is an early-stageemerging commercial company focused on developing, designing and manufacturing innovative RF filter products for the mobile wireless device industry, including for products such as smartphones and tablets, cellularnetwork infrastructure equipment, WiFi Customer Premise Equipment (“CPE”) and WiFi premise equipment.defense applications. Located between the device’s antenna and its digital backend, the RFFERF front-end (“RFFE”) is the circuitry that performs the analog signal processing and contains components such as amplifiers, filters and switches. To construct the resonators that are the building blocks for the RF filter, weWe have developed a fundamentally new single-crystaland proprietary microelectromechanical systems (“MEMS”) based bulk acoustic wave (“BAW”) technology and unique manufacturing flow, which we have trademarked as XBAW. Our XBAWTMprocess incorporates optimized high purity piezoelectric materials and device technology that we referdesigned to as BulkONE®.achieve high power, high frequency and/or wide bandwidth filter performance. Filters are critical in selecting and rejecting signals, and their performance enables differentiation in the hardware modules defining the RFFE.

 

We believe owning the core resonator device technology, manufacturing facility and manufacturingintellectual property (“IP”) to produce our designs is the most direct and effectiveefficient means of delivering our solutions to the market. Furthermore, our technology is based upon bulk-mode acoustic resonance, which we believe is superior to surface-mode acoustic resonance for high bandhigh-band applications that include 4G/LTE, emerging 5G, WiFi, and WiFi 5GHz frequency bands. Whiledefense applications. Although some of our target customers utilize or make the RFFE module, several customersthey may lack access to critical highultra-high band (UHB) filter technology needed to compete in high band applications and other traditional surface-mode solutions where higher power performance is required.high-frequency applications. We intend to design, manufacture, and market our RF filter products to multiple mobile phone OEM, cellularoriginal equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), defense OEMs, network infrastructure OEMs, and WiFi router customers andCPE OEM’s to enable broader competition among the front-end module manufacturers. We plan to operate as a “pure-play” RF filter supplier and align with the front-end module manufacturers who seek to acquire high performance filters to growexpand their module business.

 

We have built prototype resonatorscurrently build high performance RF filter circuits, using our proprietary single-crystal materials. We are currently optimizing our BulkONE® technologyfirst generation XBAWTM wafer process, in our 120,000 sq. ft.square-foot wafer-manufacturing plantfacility located in Canandaigua, New York. WeYork, which we acquired in June 2017. As of September 11, 2019, our (IP) portfolio included 24 patents, including one blocking patent that we have licensed from Cornell University. Additionally, we have 52 active and pending patent applications. These patents cover our XBAWTMRF filter technology from the substrate level through the system application layer. Where possible, we leverage both federal and state level non-dilutive R&D grants to support development and commercialization of our technology. 

We are developing resonatorsRF filters for 4G/LTE, emerging 5G, WiFi and WiFidefense bands and the associatedusing our proprietary resonator device models and product design kits required to design(PDK’s). As we qualify our first RF filters. Oncefilter products, we have stabilized the wafer process technology, we plan to engageare engaging with strategictarget customers to evaluate first our resonators and then our filter prototypes.solutions. Our initial designs will target high bandUHB, sub-7 GHz 4G/LTE, emerging 5G, WiFi and WiFi frequencydefense bands. Since Akoustis owns its core technology and controls access to its intellectual property, we canexpect to offer several ways to engage with potential customers. First, we canintend to engage with the mobilemultiple wireless market,markets, providing standardized filters that we design and offer as a standard catalog component to multiple customers.components. Second, we can start with aexpect to deliver unique filters to customer-supplied filter specification,specifications, which we will design and fabricate foron a specific customer.customized basis. Finally, we canmay offer our models and design kits for our customers to design their own filter intofilters utilizing our proprietary technology.

In December 2014, Akoustis, Inc. was awarded its first small business innovative research (“SBIR”) R&D grant with the National Science Foundation (“NSF”). The NSF program, which increases the incentive and opportunity for startups and small businesses to undertake cutting-edge, high-quality scientific research and development, requires that the grantee have full responsibility for the conduct of the project or activity supported and the adherence to the award conditions. Total funds received from the NSF and matching funds from North Carolina Science, Technology & Innovation Department of Commerce since inception through September 8, 2017 total $892,000.

Our partnership with NSF has strengthened since the start of our engagement, and its support has accelerated our technology commercialization as well as funded technical jobs. We have additional opportunities for new grants and matching funds from our current small business program partnership with NSF including the Phase IIb award.

 

We have earned minimal revenue from operations since inception, and we have funded our operations have been fundedprimarily with capital contributions,development contracts, RF filter prototype and initial production orders, government grants, MEMS foundry and engineering services, sales of our equity securities, and issuance of debt. We have incurred losses totaling approximately $15.8$67.5 million from inception through June 30, 2017.2019. These losses are primarily the result of material and material processing costs associated with developing and commercializing our technology, as well as personnel costs, professional fees (primarily accounting and legal) as well as, and other general and administrative expenses offset by the $1.7 million gain from the bargain acquisition of the STC-MEMS Business in June 2017.(“G&A”) expenses. We expect to continue to incur substantial costs for commercialization of our technology on a continuous basis because our business model involves materials and solid-state device technology development as well asand engineering of catalog and custom filter designs.design solutions.  

 

As of September 8, 2017, the Company had $6.7 million of cash and cash equivalents.  The Company believes this is sufficient to cover our cost of operations including anticipated capital expenditures through December 31, 2017. As a result, we will need to obtain additional capital through the sale of additional equity securities, debt and additional grants, or otherwise, to fund operations past that date.  There is no assurance that the Company’s projections and estimates are accurate. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.


Plan of Operation

We plan to commercialize our technology by designing and manufacturing single-band and multi-band BAW RF filter fromsolutions in our NYNew York wafer fabrication facility. OurWe expect our filter solutions will address problems (such as power loss, bandwidth, power handling, and isolation) created by the growing number and convergence of frequency bands in the RFFE of mobile devices, infrastructure and premise equipment to support 4G/LTE, emerging 5G, and WiFi. We have prototyped our first single-band low-loss BAW filter designs for 4G/LTE frequency bands, which are dominated by competitive BAW solutions and historically cannot be addressed with low band,low-band, lower power handling SAWsurface acoustic wave (“SAW”) technology. During the second half of calendar 2017, we plan to sample filter product prototypes to prospective customers that cover LTE-Band 41, Radar, and 5GHz WiFi frequency bands.

   


In order to

To succeed, we must convince mobile phone OEMs, RFFE module manufacturers, cellularnetwork infrastructure OEMs, WiFi CPE OEMs and WiFi router OEMsdefense customers to use our BulkONE®XBAWTM filter technology in their systems and modules. However, since there are only two dominant BAW filter suppliers in the industry that have high bandhigh-band technology, and both utilize such technology as a competitive advantage at the module level, we expect customers that lack access to high bandhigh-band filter technology will be open to engage with our pure-play filter company.

Once we complete customer validation of our technology, we expect to complete qualification of our BulkONE® process technology in the second half of calendar 2017 to support a product family of 4G/LTE filter solutions. Once we have stabilized our process technology in a manufacturing environment, we will complete a production release of our high band filter products in the frequency range from 2.5GHz to 6.0GHz. The target frequency bands will be prioritized based upon customer priority. We expect this will require recruiting and hiring additional personnel and capital investments.

 

We plan to pursue RF filter design and R&D development agreements and potentially joint ventures with target customers and other strategic partners. These types of arrangements may subsidize technology development costs and qualification, filter design costs, as well asand offer complementary technology and market intelligence and other avenues to revenue. However, we intend to retain ownership of our core technology, intellectual property, designs, and related improvements. We expect to pursue development of catalog designs for multiple customers and to offer such catalog products in multipleone or more sales channels.

 

We have successfully transferred our BulkONE® wafer process to our STC-MEMS Business. The BulkONE® process uses a rangePlease see “Overview” and “Plan of single-crystal group III-nitride piezoelectric materials, which were fabricated into BAW resonators and characterized at cellular communication frequencies to determine their bandwidth. On May 23, 2016, we announced an experimental, 3.4 GHz BAW two-port series-configured resonator device with a high K-squared of 12.5%, which was modeled near resonance frequency and was constructed from single-crystal undoped aluminum nitride (AlN) material. On August 8, 2016, we announced improvements to our single-crystal BAW resonator design and process technology to achieve a quality factor (Q) of 2090, which is suitableOperation” under Item 1. Business for BAW RF filters targeting 4G/LTE, WIFI and emerging 5G and 5G WIFI mobile wireless applications. These resonators, which are the core building blocks enabling BAW RF filters, were fabricated using our patented BulkONE® process. Technology development efforts continue on wafer and process optimization, specifically, through targeted activities for Q-factor improvements.more information.

  

As referenced in the Business section, in August 2016, Akoustis announced its first customer engagement signing multiple non-exclusive agreements with a Chinese tier one RF front end (RFFE) module manufacturer to supply the Company’s premium RF filter products for next-generation high-band RFFE modules for 4G, emerging 4.5G and 5G mobile - targeting the China and India OEM markets. In December 2016, the Company announced its second customer engagement, for the development of a band-specific, high-frequency (above 3.5 GHz) BAW RF filter for a non-mobile commercial application with a well-established OEM specializing in non-mobile communication systems with annual revenue of more than $1 Billion.  In May 2017, the Company announced its third customer engagement for the development of high-performance BAW diplexers for non-mobile communication systems with a multi-billion dollar, Fortune 500 U.S. company, which provides systems, products and solutions to government and commercial customers worldwide. 


In August 2017, the Company announced its first shipment of premium high-band BAW RF filter prototypes manufactured using its patented single-crystal BulkONE® technology to the aforementioned Chinese tier one customer. The shipment included high performance, LTE-TDD Band 41, 2.6 GHz BAW RF filters that will satisfy the challenging filter requirements in the high growth 4G LTE mobile market in China.

We will continue discussions with additional prospective customers, although these discussions may not result in any agreements. We expect to proceed with our plan to develop a family of standard catalog filter designs regardless of the outcome of these discussions.

As of September 8, 2017, we had approximately $6.7 million of cash and cash equivalents to fund a majority of the foregoing milestones, for product development to commercialize our technology, research and development, the development of our patent strategy and expansion of our patent portfolio, as well as for working capital and other general corporate purposes. These funds are expected to be sufficient to fund our activities through December 2017. However, there is no assurance that the Company’s projections and estimates are accurate. Our anticipated costs include employee salaries and benefits, compensation paid to consultants, capital costs for research and other equipment, costs associated with development activities including travel and administration, legal expenses, sales and marketing costs, general and administrative expenses, and other costs associated with an early stage, publicly-traded technology company. We anticipate increasing the number of employees by approximately 15 to 20 employees in the next twelve months; however, this is highly dependent on the nature of our development efforts, our success in commercialization, and our ability to raise additional funding. We anticipate adding employees for research and development in both our New York and North Carolina facilities, as well as general and administrative functions, to support our efforts. We expect to incur consulting expenses related to technology development and other efforts as well as legal and related expenses to protect our intellectual property. We expect capital expenditures to be approximately $7.5 million for the purchase of equipment and software during the next 12 months and are currently investigating the feasibility of using debt facilities, equipment leases, or government grants to fund all or part of the purchase of the equipment.

The amounts we actually spend for any specific purpose may vary significantly and will depend on a number of factors including, but not limited to, the pace of progress of our commercialization and development efforts, actual needs with respect to product testing, R&D, market conditions, and changes in or revisions to our marketing strategies. In addition, we may use a portion of any net proceeds to acquire complementary products, technologies or businesses; however, we do not have plans for any acquisitions at this time.

Commercial development of new technology is, by its nature, unpredictable. Although we will undertake development efforts with commercially reasonable diligence, there can be no assurance that our current cash position will be sufficient to enable us to commercialize our technology to the extent needed to create future sales to sustain operations as contemplated herein. If our current cash is insufficient for these purposes, or the Company does not receive anticipated proceeds from research grants or such grant payments are delayed, or the Company experiences costs in excess of estimates to continue its research and development plan, it is possible that the Company would not have sufficient resources to continue as a going concern for the next year, and we will consider other options to continue our path to commercialization, including, but not limited to, additional financing through follow-on stock offerings, debt financing, co-development agreements, curtailment of operations, suspension of operations, sale or licensing of developed intellectual or other property, or other alternatives.

If we are unable to obtain the funds that we believe are needed to develop our technology and enable future sales, we may be required to scale back our development plans by reducing expenditures for employees, consultants, business development and marketing efforts, and other envisioned expenditures. This could reduce our ability to commercialize our technology or require us to seek further funding earlier, or on less favorable terms.

We cannot assure you that our technology will be accepted, that we will ever generate revenues sufficient to support our operations, or that we will ever be profitable. Furthermore, since we have no committed source of financing, there is no assurance that we will be able to obtain sufficient capital as and when we need it to continue our operations. If we cannot obtain sufficient capital as and when we need it, we may be required to severely curtail, or even to cease, our operations.


Critical Accounting Policies

 

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Certain accounting policies and estimates are particularly important to the understanding of our financial position and results of operations and require the application of significant judgment by our management or can be materially affected by changes from period to period in economic factors or conditions that are outside of our control. As a result, they are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. In applying these policies, our management uses its judgment to determine the appropriate assumptions to be used in the determination of certain estimates. Those estimates are based on our historical operations, our future business plans and projected financial results, the terms of existing contracts, our observance of trends in the industry, information provided by our customers and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate.

 

Derivative Liability

 

The Company evaluates its options, warrants, convertible notes, and other contracts, if any, to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with paragraph 815-10-05-4 and Section 815-40-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as either an asset or a liability. The change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion, exercise or cancellation of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the date of conversion, exercise or cancellation and then the related fair value is reclassified to equity.

 

In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.

 

The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

 

The Company adopted Section 815-40-15 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 815-40-15”) to determine whether an instrument (or an embedded feature) is indexed to the Company’s own stock.  Section 815-40-15 provides that an entity should use a two-step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions.

 

The Company utilizes a binomial option pricing modelMonte Carlo simulation to compute the fair value of the derivative liability and to mark to market the fair value of the derivative at each balance sheet date. The Company records the change in the fair value of the derivative as other income or expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

 

The Company utilizes the with-and-without method, a form of the income approach model to compute the fair value of its embedded derivatives associated with its convertible notes. The fair value of the embedded derivatives represents the difference in the present value of anticipated cash flows assuming the feature is present as compared to a security without the same feature. The Company records the change in the fair value of the derivative as other income or expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

 

The Company measures the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on the guidance of ASC 820, “FairFair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. 

 

ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

  


Fair value measurements are categorized using a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs used to measure fair value, which prioritize the inputs into three broad levels:

 

Level 1 - Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

 

Level 2 - Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date, and include those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies.

 

Level 3 - Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.

 

Equity-based compensationStock-based Compensation

 

The Company recognizes compensation expense for all equity–basedstock-based payments in accordance with ASC 718 “Compensation - Stock Compensation". Under fair value recognition provisions, the Company recognizes equity–basedstock-based compensation net of an estimated forfeiture rateforfeitures and recognizes compensation cost only for those shares expected to vest over the requisite service period of the award.

 

Restricted stock awards and restricted stock units are granted at the discretion of the Company. These awards are restricted as to the transfer of ownership and generally vest over the requisite service periods, typically over a four-year period (vesting on a straight–linestraight-line basis). The fair value of a stock award is equal to the fair market value of a share of Company stock on the grant date.

 

The fair value of an option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black–ScholesBlack-Scholes option valuation model. The Black–ScholesBlack-Scholes option valuation model requires the development of assumptions that are inputs into the model. These assumptions are the value of the underlying share, the expected stock volatility, the risk–freerisk-free interest rate, the expected life of the option, and the dividend yield on the underlying stock and the expected forfeiture rate.stock. Expected volatility is benchmarked against similar companies in a similar industry overcalculated using the expected option life and other appropriate factors. Risk–freehistorical volatilities of the Company’s common stock traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market. Risk-free interest rates are calculated based on continuously compounded risk–freerisk-free rates for the appropriate term. The dividend yield is assumed to be zero as the Company has never paid or declared any cash dividends on its Common Stock and does not intend to pay dividends on its Common Stock in the foreseeable future. The expected forfeiture rate is estimated based on management’s best estimate.Company accounts for the impact of forfeitures as they occur.

 

Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of equity–basedstock-based payment awards requires the input of the subjective assumptions described above. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of equity–basedstock-based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, which involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, our equity–basedstock-based compensation could be materially different in the future. In addition, the Company is required to estimateaccount for the expected forfeiture rate and recognize expense onlyimpact of forfeitures as the forfeitures for those shares expected to vest.occur. If the Company’s actual forfeiture rate is materially different from its estimate,forfeitures are material, the equity–basedstock-based compensation could be significantly different from what the Company has recorded in the current period. 

 

The Company accounts for share–basedstock-based payments granted to non–employeesnon-employees in accordance with ASC 505-40, “Equity Based Payments to Non–EmployeesNon-Employees”. The Company determines the fair value of the stock–basedstock-based payment as either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. If the fair value of the equity instruments issued is used, it is measured using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of either (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, or (2) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete. The fair value of the equity instruments is re-measured each reporting period over the requisite service period.

  

34

 

 

Results of Operations

 

Our results of operations are presented for the yearfiscal years ended June 30, 20172019 and June 30, 2018.

Year Ended June 30, 2019 Compared to Year Ended June 30, 2018

Revenue

The Company recorded revenue of $1.4 million for the year-ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the year ended June 30, 2016. Our results of operations$1.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2017 include five days2018. The increase of operations$0.2 million was primarily due to increases in engineering services of our STC-MEMS Business, which we acquired on June 26, 2017.$0.4 million and increases in filter/amplifier sales of $0.2 million offset by a decrease in foundry services revenue of $0.4 million.

  

Year Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Year Ended June 30, 2016Cost of Revenue

 

The Company recorded cost of revenue of $486,000 for$1.0 million in both fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2018. These costs include direct labor, material, and facility costs primarily associated with the year-ended June 30, 2017 as compared to $255,000foundry services revenue, manufacturing of filter product and engineering services.

Research and Development Expenses

R&D expenses were $19.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2016. The revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 was made up primarily of grant revenue from the National Science Foundation for the Phase II grant. The revenue recorded in the comparative fiscal year was also made up primarily of grant revenue from the National Science Foundation ($50,000 from Phase I and $192,000 for Phase II).

R&D expenses consist of costs for technical and engineering personnel, travel expense for R&D personnel and costs to develop and commercialize our technology including materials, material processing, and contractors. R&D expenses2019, which were $4.4 million for the year-ended June 30, 2017 and were $2.7$6.0 million, or 151.6%45%, higher than the prior year.year amount of $13.3 million. The year-over-year increase was due to the ramp up of R&D activityprimarily in the Company’s third year of operations. The increased expenditures occurred primarily in areas of R&D personnel, stock-based compensation, depreciation, and facility costs. R&D expenses include personnel costs, stock-based compensation, facility and material costs.costs and depreciation expense. Personnel costs were $1.4$7.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 compared to $717,000$5.0 million in the comparative period, an increase of $654,000$2.1 million, or 91%43.6%. The increase included five days of costs associated with the New York foundryhigher spend was primarily due to R&D personnel (approximately $ 127,000), costs for the addition of technical and engineering hires in the North Carolina facility in the 2017 fiscal year, and the full year effect of N.C. new hires made in the prior fiscal year.our acquired NY Facility, as well as incremental R&D hires. Stock-based compensation of $1.3$4.2 million for the year ended June 30, 20172019 was $1.1$1.7 million, or 566%71.5%, higher than the year ended June 30, 20162018 due to new restricted stock awards made to R&D personnel and the change in the fair market value of awards made to technical and engineering contractors infrom prior periods. Facility and material costs of $5.3 million primarily associated with the NY Facility, increased by $0.6 million, or 12.9%, from the year ended June 30, 2018. These costs include utilities, repair and maintenance, supplies, materials and parts. In addition, material and material process costs were $1.4depreciation expense was $2.4 million as compared to $670,000$1.1 million in the comparative period ended June 30, 2016 which was2018, an increase of $681,000,$1.4 million, or 102.0%. The year-over-year cost increase was128.6%, due to the ramp of raw material purchasesadditional capital expenditures made in fiscal year 2019.

General and material processing costs for product development activities.Administrative Expenses

 

General and administrative (“G&A”) costs include salaries and wages for executive and administrative staff, stock-based compensation, professional fees, insurance costs and other general costs associated with the administration of our business. General and administrative expenses for the year ended June 30, 20172019 were $6.0$8.7 million versus $2.9$8.8 million for the comparative period. The increase of $3.1 million, or 105.0%, was associated mainly with increases in personnel costs, professional fees, insurance expense, stock-based compensation and travel. Personnel costs of $1.4 million were higher by $231,000, or 20.1%, due to the increase in the number of administrative personnel, while professional fees of $1.2 million, associated with legal, accounting and investor relations, were higher by $645,000, or 113%. The legal, accounting and investor relations fees incurred in the yearperiod ended June 30, 2017 ramped up as the result2018. The decrease of Company’s second year$0.1 million, or 1.2%, was primarily driven by lower discretionary spending of being a public reporting company; first on the OTC Markettravel and then on NASDAQ. Stock-based compensationother expenses.

Other Operating Expenses

Other operating expenses for the year ended June 30, 20172019 were $50 thousand compared to other expenses of $395 thousand in fiscal year 2018. The $345 thousand decrease was $2.6 million and higher by $1.9 million, or 295%, asdue to a resultreduction of the issuance of new awardsimpairment on assets held for G&A personnel granted after June 2016 and the recording of the change in the fair market value of stock grants issued to investor relations consultants.sale.

 

Other Income/(Expense)

Other income and expenseexpenses for the year ended June 30, 2017 was $850,000 and included a2019 were $1.7 million gain on bargain purchase relatedcompared to the acquisitionother income of the STC-MEMS Business,$0.5 million in fiscal year 2018. The $2.2 million increase in expense was due to higher interest expense of $2.6 million offset by an $877,000 loss onchanges in the fair valuereal estate contingent liability and derivative liabilities which resulted in income of derivatives for placement agent warrants issued in connection with private placements in 2015 and 2016. These warrants were amended in December 2016 and January 2017 to remove the derivative feature and are now classified as equity. Other expense was $967,000 for the year ended June 30, 2016 and was primarily related to the loss on fair value of derivatives recorded for the placement agent warrants referenced above.$0.4 million.

Net Loss

 

The Company recorded a net loss of $9.1$29.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2017,2019, compared to a net loss of $5.4$21.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2016.2018. The year-over-year incremental loss of $3.7$7.5 million, or 68%34.5%, was primarily driven by higher material costs due to the ramp upan increase in interest expense of research and development activities, higher professional fees due to the costs associated with the Company’s second year of being a public reporting company,$2.6 million, higher personnel costs for both R&Dof $2.3 million (primarily related to research and administrative headcount, includingdevelopment), and increased stock compensation costs for stock-based compensation,of $1.7 million. These increases were partially offset by reductions in the $1.7 million gain on bargain purchase price recorded due to the acquisitionreal estate contingent liability and derivative liabilities of the STC-MEMS Business.

$0.4 million.

  


35

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Financing Activities

We have earned minimal revenue from operations since inception, and our operations have been funded with capital contributions, private placements of stock, grants and debt.


On March 10, 2016, we held a closing of a private placement offering (the “March 2016 Offering”) in which we sold 494,125 shares of our Common Stock to accredited investors at a fixed purchase price of $1.60 per share (the “2016 Offering Price”), for aggregate gross proceeds of $790,600 (before deducting expenses of the March 2016 Offering). On April 14, 2016, we held a closing of a private placement offering (the “April 2016 Offering,” and together with the March 2016 Offering, the “2016 Offering”) in which we sold 1,741,185 shares of our Common Stock at the “2016 Offering Price, for aggregate gross proceeds of $2.8 million (before deducting expenses of the April 2016 Offering).

With closings in each of November and December 2016 and January and February 2017, the Company sold a total of 2,142,000 shares of Common Stock in a private placement offering (the “2016-2017 Offering”) at a fixed purchase price of $5.00 per share (the “2016-2017 Offering Price”). Aggregate gross proceeds were $10.7 million (before deducting commissions and expenses of the offering).

In May 2017, the Company held a closing of a private placement offering (the “2017 Offering”) in which it sold an aggregate of 663,000 shares of Common Stock at a fixed purchase price of $9.00 per share to accredited investors, for aggregate gross proceeds of $5,967,000 (before deducting commissions and expenses of the offering).

 

Since inception, through June 2017, we received $892,000 in fundsthe Company has recorded approximately $1.1 million and $2.1 million of revenue from NSF/SBIRcontract research and government grants, and NC matching funds.microelectromechanical systems (“MEMS”) foundry and engineering review services, respectively. Our operations thus far have been funded primarily with contract research and government grants, foundry services, engineering services, sales of our equity securities, and debt.

 

The Company estimates the $6.7had $30.2 million of cash on hand as of September 8, 2017 will fund its operations, including currentJune 30, 2019, which reflects an increase of $15.4 million compared to $14.8 million as of June 30, 2018. The $15.4 million increase is primarily due to $37.8 million of cash proceeds from sales of common stock as well as convertible note offerings. Offsetting the cash proceeds were cash used in operating activities of $17.6 million and cash used for capital expense commitments through December 2017. As a result, we will need to obtain additional capital throughexpenditures of $4.8 million.

Financing Activities

On May 14, 2018 the saleCompany completed the offering of additional equity securities, debt and additional grants, or otherwise, to fund operations past that date. There is no assurance that$15.0 million principal amount of the Company’s projections6.5% Convertible Senior Secured Notes due 2023. The net proceeds of the offering after payment of offering costs were approximately $13.1 million. The notes will mature on May 31, 2023, unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased. Interest on the notes accrues at the rate of 6.5% per year and estimates are accurate. Althoughis payable at the Company’s option quarterly in cash and/or freely tradable shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to certain limitations. The notes may be converted into common stock at the option of the holder at any time prior to maturity at an initial conversion price of $6.55 per share, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. If the holder elects to convert the notes at any time on or after the date that is one year after the last date of original issuance of the notes and prior to May 31, 2021, the holder will also receive a make-whole payment equal to the remaining scheduled interest payments that would have been made on the notes converted had such notes remained outstanding through May 31, 2021 (the “put date”). At the Company’s option, make-whole payments may be paid in cash and/or freely tradable shares of the Company’s common stock.

On October 23, 2018 the Company is actively managing and controllingcompleted the offering of $10.0 million principal amount of the Company’s cash outflows to mitigate these risks, these matters raise substantial doubt about6.5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023. The notes are unsecured and rank pari passu with the Company’s abilityoutstanding unsubordinated liabilities, including its 6.5% Convertible Senior Secured Notes due 2023 issued in May 2018. The net proceeds of the offering after payment of offering costs were approximately $8.9 million. The notes will mature on November 30, 2023, unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased. Interest on the notes accrues at the rate of 6.5% per year and is payable in cash on each February 28, May 31, August 31 and November 30, beginning February 28, 2019. The notes are convertible into common stock at the option of the holder at any time prior to continue asmaturity at an initial conversion price of $5.10 per share, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. 


On October 23, 2018, the Company also sold a going concern.total of 7,250,000 shares of its common stock at a price to the public of $4.25 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of $30.8 million before deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses payable by the Company of approximately $2.1 million.

 

Balance Sheet and Working Capital

 

June 30, 20172019 Compared to June 30, 20162018

 

As of June 30, 2017,2019, the Company had current assets of $10.0$31.8 million made up primarily of cash on hand of $9.6$30.2 million. As of June 30, 2016,2018, current assets were $4.3$15.9 million comprised primarily of cash on hand of $4.2$14.8 million. The $5.54$15.4 million increase in cash year over year wasis primarily due to net$37.5 million of cash proceeds from private placement offeringssales of $15.3 million offset by the cash expended for operations of $5.59 million and the investment in machinery and equipment of $1.6 millioncommon stock as well as convertible note offerings. Offsetting the $2.8cash proceeds were cash used in operating activities of $17.6 million and cash paid at the June 2017 closingused for capital expenditures of the acquisition for the STC-MEMS Business. The Company also saw a year over year increase in inventory of $145,000, mainly due to the purchase of inventory ($96,000) associated with the STC-MEMS acquisition, an increase in prepaid expenses of $103,000 due to the annual service fee payment for NASDAQ ($35,000) and new license fees for Cornell University for $45,000.

$4.8 million.

 

Property, Plant and Equipment was $7.9$15.2 million as of June 30, 20172019 as compared to a balance of $207,000$12.8 million as of the year ended June 30, 2016.2018. The approximate $7.6$2.4 million year-over-year increase is primarily due to the purchase of equipment buildingfor the NY facility of $4.5 million and land acquired with the STC-MEMS Business (cumulative recorded valuesoftware of $6.1 million) as well as an additional investment$0.3 million primarily offset by depreciation of $1.7 million in fixed assets, primarily equipment for research and development.$2.5 million.

  

Total assets as of June 30, 20172019 and June 30, 20162018 were $18.1$47.9 million and $4.5$29.3 million, respectively.

 

Current liabilities as of June 30, 20172019 were $1.4$3.2 million and increased year-over-year by $816,000. We saw an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses$0.6 million which was primarily due to vesting of $793,000 due mainly to the ramp up of both R&D activities and administrative and support costs including additional personnel, material spend, and professional fees. employee related equity compensation.

 

Long-term liabilities totaled $1.7$18.8 million as of June 30, 2017,2019, compared to $1.3$12.8 million for the prior year period. The increase of $408,000$6.0 million was primarily due to the October 2018 convertible debt offering partially offset by a decrease in the derivative liability recorded for warrants issued to placement agents in connection with private placements in 2015 and the 2016 Offering. During December 2016 and January 2017, the Company amended these warrant agreements to eliminate the derivative feature, and as a result, the liability was fully reclassed to stockholder’s equity in the year ended June 30, 2017. This decrease in long-term liability was offset by an increase of $1.7 million, which was a long-term contingent real estate contingent liability associated with the acquisition of the STC-MEMS Business that closed on June 26, 2017.

$0.8 million.

 


Stockholders’ equity was $15.0$26.0 million as of June 30, 2017,2019, compared to $2.7$13.8 million as of June 30, 2016.

2018. Additional paid-in-capital (“APIC”) was $30.8$93.4 million as of June 30, 20172018 and increased by $21.4$41.3 million. The year-over-year increase was due to: (1)to an increase from net proceeds of $15.4$28.7 million for the issuance of Common Stockcommon stock during the year, common stock issued for services in the 2016-2017 Offeringamount of $6.7 million, impact of beneficial conversion feature on convertible note of $4.0 million and the 2017 Offering, less $992,000 for the fair value of warrants issued to placement agents for a total of 291,000 shares of Common Stock, (2) increase of $4.8 million of APIC recorded due to the vesting of restrictedcommon stock agreements granted to employees and contractors in lieu of cash compensation, and (3) an increase due to the release of derivative liabilities associated with warrants issued in 2015 and 2016 offering for $2.2 million after the warrant agreements were amended to eliminate the derivative feature in December and January 2017.payment of convertible note interest of $1.0 million. The $21.4$12.2 million increase in stockholder’sstockholders’ equity wasconsisted of the $41.3 million increase in APIC reduced by the $9.1$29.2 million net loss recorded for the year ended June 30, 2017.2019.

  

Working capital as of June 30, 2017 was $8.7 million, compared to $3.7 million as of June 30, 2016.

Cash Flow Analysis

 

Year Ended June 30, 20172019 Compared to the Year Ended June 30, 20162018

 

Operating activities used cash of $5.5$17.7 million during the year ended June 30, 20172019 and $3.3$14.2 million for the 20162018 comparative period. The $2.2$3.4 million year-over-year increase in cash used was attributable to higher operating expenses associated with the ramp up of development and commercialization activities (primarily R&D personnel and material costs), higher spend on G&A costs for support personnel and professional fees.fees and increase in depreciation expense.

 

Investing activities used cash of $4.5$4.9 million for the year ended June 30, 20172019 compared to $204,000$7.0 million for the comparative year ended June 30, 2016.2018. The $2.1 million year-over-year increasedecrease was primarily due to the $2.8 million cash paid at closing for the acquisition of the STC-MEMS Business, as well as increaseddecreased spend on R&D equipment (higher by $1.5 million).equipment.

 

Financing activities provided cash of $15.6$37.9 million for the year ended June 30, 20172019 versus $3.3$26.4 million for the 20162018 comparative period. The $12.3$11.5 million increase was due to additional proceeds from funds raised incommon stock offset by lower proceeds from convertible notes issued during the 2016-2017 Offering andperiod compared to the 2017 Offering.prior period.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

 

The Company did not engage in any “off-balance sheet arrangements” (as that term is defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K) as of June 30, 2017.2019.

  

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

 

Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.applicable.

 

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

Our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016 are included beginning on Page F-1 immediately following the signature page to this Report. See Item 15 for a list of the financial statements included herein.

ITEM 9.           CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

  


ITEM 9A.        CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that is designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2017. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of such date due to the material weakness described below with respect to our internal control over financial reporting.


Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2017. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013). Based on that evaluation under this framework, our management concluded that our internal control over  financial reporting was not effective.

During its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, management identified a material weakness in the design of controls over it acquisition accounting and reporting practices as it relates to the acquisition of the STC-MEMS Business.  The effectiveness of controls surrounding the acquisition accounting processing, review of external advisors work and subsequent compilation and reporting has the potential, when taken together, to represent a more than remote likelihood that a material misstatement could occur and not be prevented or detected.   Therefore, management has determined this has risen to the level of a material weakness.   To remediate this material weakness, management intends to increase the size and capabilities of its accounting department and place less reliance on external consultants.

Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness as to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Further, because of changes in conditions, effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting may vary over time. Our system contains self-monitoring mechanisms, and actions are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified.

This Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company (as a smaller reporting company) to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Except for the material weakness described above, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.        OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10.         DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors and Executive Officers

Below are the names of, and certain information regarding, our current executive officers and directors.

NameAgePositionDate Named to Board
of Directors/as
Executive Officer
Arthur E. Geiss64Co-Chairman of the BoardMay 22, 2015
Jerry D. Neal73Co-Chairman of the BoardMay 22, 2015
Jeffrey B. Shealy48President and Chief Executive Officer; DirectorMay 22, 2015
John T. Kurtzweil61Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting OfficerJuly 14, 2017
David M. Aichele51Vice President of Business DevelopmentMay 22, 2015
Cindy C. Payne57Vice President of Finance, Corporate Controller, and TreasurerMay 22, 2015
Steven P. DenBaars55DirectorMay 22, 2015
Jeffrey K. McMahon46DirectorMay 22, 2015
Steven P. Miller69DirectorJuly 14, 2017
Suzanne B. Rudy62DirectorJuly 14, 2017


Directors are elected to serve until their successors are elected and qualified. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the meeting of stockholders at which they are elected and hold office until the expiration of the term for which he or she was elected or until a successor has been elected and qualified.

A majority of the authorized number of directors constitutes a quorum of the Board of Directors for the transaction of business. The directors must be present at the meeting to constitute a quorum. However, any action required or permitted to be taken by the Board of Directors may be taken without a meeting if all members of the Board of Directors individually or collectively consent in writing to the action.

Executive officers are appointed by the Board of Directors and serve at its pleasure.

The principal occupation and business experience during the past five years for our executive officers and directors is as follows:

Arthur E. Geiss, Co-Chairman of the Board, founded AEG Consulting, LLC in 2003 and currently serves as its Owner and CEO. AEG Consulting offers guidance concerning manufacturing, operations, and process development to technology companies. Prior to establishing AEG Consulting, Mr. Geiss served as Vice President of Wafer Fab Operations at RF Micro Devices, Inc. (“RFMD”) (now Qorvo, Inc.). He was responsible for the start-up and operations of Gallium Arsenide epitaxial-growth and wafer-fabrication. Previous to RFMD, Mr. Geiss held management positions with Alpha Industries, Inc. (purchased by Skyworks Solutions, Inc.) and before that at ITT Gallium Arsenide Technology Center (purchased by Cobham plc). At both companies, he was responsible for process and device development and wafer fabrication operations. Prior to these, Mr. Geiss held a research position at the Xerox Palo Alto Research Center (now PARC, Inc.). At PARC he investigated the structure of vitreous materials and amorphous thin-films using Raman spectroscopy. Mr. Geiss has served as a Member of the Executive Committee of the IEEE GaAs IC Symposium (now CSICS) and as a Member of the Executive Committee of the GaAs Manufacturing Technology Conference (now CS Mantech). He has numerous patents and publications on electronic devices, processing, and manufacturing. Mr. Geiss earned a B.S. degree at Lafayette College and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees at Brown University, all in physics. We believe that Mr. Geiss adds value to our Board of Directors based on his extensive experience with technology companies, his executive leadership and management experience and his research background.

Jerry D. Neal, Co-Chairman of the Board, founded RFMD (now, Qorvo, Inc.) in 1991 and served as its Executive Vice President of Marketing and Strategic Development from January 2002 to May 31, 2012. Dr. Neal served as a Vice President of Marketing of RFMD, from May 1991 to January 2000 and its Executive Vice President of Sales, Marketing and Strategic Development from January 2000 to January 2002. Prior to joining RFMD, he was employed for 10 years with Analog Devices, Inc., including as Marketing Engineer, Marketing Manager and Business Development Manager. Dr. Neal also founded Moisture Control Systems for the production of his patented electronic sensor for measurement of soil moisture for research, which was later sold to Hancor, Inc. He has been a Director of Jazz Semiconductor, Inc. since November 2002. Dr. Neal served as a Director of RFMD from February 1992 to July 1993. He also held various positions at Hewlett-Packard. Dr. Neal received his Associate’s Degree in Electrical Engineering from Gaston Technical Institute and North Carolina State University and his doctor of business management degree from Southern Wesleyan University. We believe that Dr. Neal adds value to our Board of Directors based on his extensive executive leadership and management experience and his sales, marketing and product development background.


Jeffrey B. Shealy is our President and Chief Executive Officer, as well as one of our directors. He has over 20 years of experience in the RF/Wireless industry focused on building businesses around solid-state materials and electron device innovation. He held the position of Vice President and General Manager at RFMD from 2001 until 2014. Mr. Shealy is a Howard Hughes Doctoral Fellow and spent 7 years with Hughes Electronics at Hughes Research Labs (now HRL Labs) and Hughes Network Systems (now Hughes). He previously founded RF Nitro, a RF Power Amplifier high-tech venture, which was acquired by RFMD in 2001. Mr. Shealy holds an MBA degree from Wake Forest University, Master of Science and Doctorate degrees in Electrical and Computer Engineering from University of California at Santa Barbara (UCSB), and a Bachelor’s of Science degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from North Carolina State University (NCSU). We believe that Mr. Shealy adds value to our Board of Directors based on his intimate knowledge of our business plans and strategies, his experience with high tech startup ventures and his years of experience in the RF/Wireless industry.

John T. Kurtzweil, has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer since July 14, 2017, and he served as a director on the Board from January 12, 2017 to July 14, 2017. He served as VP Finance of Cree, Inc., a company that develops, manufactures, and sells lighting-class light emitting diode, lighting, and semiconductor products for power and radio-frequency applications, and Chief Financial Officer of Wolfspeed, a Cree Company, from 2015 until March 2017. He is currently providing consulting services to a limited number of businesses. Prior to his employment at Cree, Mr. Kurtzweil was an independent consultant beginning in 2014. From 2012 until 2014, Mr. Kurtzweil served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Special Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer of Extreme Networks, Inc., a provider of high-performance, open networking innovations for enterprises, services providers, and Internet exchanges, and also served as its Chief Accounting Officer. From 2006 to 2012, Mr. Kurtzweil served as Executive Vice President, Finance and as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Cree, Inc. From 2004 to 2006, Mr. Kurtzweil was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Cirrus Logic, Inc., a fabless semiconductor company. Mr. Kurtzweil currently serves as a director of Axcelis Technology, Inc., and was appointed Chairman of its Audit Committee in February 2017. Mr. Kurtzweil served as a board member for Meru Networks, Inc. for a portion of 2015 prior to its sale.

David M. Aichele is Vice President of Business Development responsible for leading the sales and marketing efforts of the Company. Mr. Aichele joined the company in May 2015, bringing over 20 years of international sales, business development, and marketing experience with him. Prior to Akoustis, Mr. Aichele was EVP Sales & Marketing for T1Visions, a high-tech software startup company ranking among the 2014 INC 500 fastest growing private companies in the U.S from 2013 to May 2015. Mr. Aichele held director positions at RFMD from 2005 to 2015, where he was responsible for the business development and launch of new RF semiconductor products targeting the cellular market, and senior management positions at Tessera and TE Connectivity, where he led business development and sales teams. Mr. Aichele holds a BSEE from Ohio University and an MBA from the Leeds School of Business at the University of Colorado.

Cindy C. Paynehas served as our Vice President of Finance, Corporate Controller, and Treasurer since July 14, 2017. Ms. Payne previously served as our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from 2015 to July 14, 2017. Ms. Payne brings to the Company over 20 years of experience in financial management. Prior to joining Akoustis, Ms. Payne most recently served as the CFO for Amerock LLC from 2014-2015, a private equity owned hardware distributor in Mooresville, NC. Prior to joining Amerock, Ms. Payne held the position of CFO for Tolt Service Group, a private equity owned technology services provider, from 2010 until the company’s sale in 2014. Her experience prior to Tolt included the role of Director of Financial Planning and Analysis in the Soft Trim Division of International Automotive Components, a Tier I supplier to the automotive industry and the role of Controller of NewBold Corporation. NewBold Corporation, located in the Roanoke, Virginia area, offers both manufactured products and technology services to retail and healthcare markets. Ms. Payne graduated Magna Cum Laude from Western Carolina University with a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration and is a Certified Public Accountant, licensed in the Commonwealth of Virginia.


Steven P. DenBaars is a Professor of Materials and Co-Director of the Solid-State Lighting Center at University of California at Santa Barbara. Professor DenBaars joined UCSB in 1991 and currently holds the Mitsubishi Chemical Chair in Solid State Lighting and Displays. He is also a co-founder and current board member of two privately held GaN startup companies, Soraa Inc. and Soraa Laser Inc. Dr. DenBaars has been in the LED business for over 25 years starting with his prior work at Hewlett-Packard Optoelectronics division in 1988 and involvement in more than two LED companies and one laser diode company. Professor DenBaars’ specific research interests include growth of wide-band gap semiconductors (GaN based), and their application to Blue LEDs and lasers and energy efficient solid-state lighting. This research has led to over 750 scientific publications and over 160 U.S. patents on electronic materials and devices. He has been awarded a NSF Young Investigator award, Young Scientist Award of the ISCS, IEEE Aron Kressel Award, and he is an IEEE Fellow and a Visiting Professor at the Institute for Advanced Studies (IAS) HKUST. He was recently elected to the National Academy of Engineering (2012), and elected Fellow of the National Academy of Inventors (2014). We believe that Professor DenBaars adds value to our Board of Directors based on his years of experience in the LED industry and his extensive research involving wide-based gap semiconductors and their application to high power electronic devices.

Jeffrey K. McMahon has been employed by North Highland, a global management consulting firm, since 2003. He has held the position of Managing Director since 2014 and is the current Market Lead for North Highland’s largest market. He has an extensive background in business and information technology consulting in the financial services, energy, and telecommunications industries. He has 20 years of experience helping Fortune 100 companies drive revenue, optimize processes, improve customer experience and manage risk. His areas of expertise include marketing, strategy articulation and realization, strategic execution, business process management and merger integration. Prior to joining North Highland, Mr. McMahon was a Manager in Accenture’s process practice area. Mr. McMahon received a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from North Carolina State University. We believe that Mr. McMahon adds value to our Board of Directors based on his extensive experience in business and technology consulting and his marketing and strategizing expertise.

Steven P. Miller served as a Board Advisor to the Board from January 2017 to June 2017. He is the President of Via Capri Inc., the general partner of Via Capri Investment L.P., a limited partnership formed by Mr. Miller in 1996. Mr. Miller is also the President of Sawmill Inc., the general partner of Sawmill Investment L.P., another limited partnership formed by Mr. Miller in 1996. From 2001 to 2003, Mr. Miller served as a director for TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. (TriQuint), then a leading supplier of high-performance components and modules for communications applications before merging with RFMD to form Qorvo, Inc. in 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Miller held several positions at Sawtek Inc. from 1979 until his retirement in 1999, including Co-Founder, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of Sawtek’s Board of Directors. Sawtek Inc. merged with TriQuint in 2001. Prior to co-founding Sawtek Inc. in 1979, Mr. Miller was Manager of the SAW Development Laboratory in the Defense Group at Texas Instruments Incorporated. Mr. Miller brings to the Board familiarity with the Company, its operations, finances, and strategic plan through his experience as a Board Advisor, as well as industry expertise, public company leadership experience, and his experience and skills in strategic growth and business development, including capital formation.

Suzanne Rudymost recently served as Vice President of Tax & Corporate Treasurer, Compliance Officer and Assistant Secretary of Qorvo, Inc., a publicly-traded company and leading supplier of semiconductor solutions for the wireless communications market, until November 2015. In addition to her treasury and compliance duties, Ms. Rudy served as a director for various subsidiaries of Qorvo, Inc. Prior to joining Qorvo, Inc. predecessor, RMFD, in 1999, Ms. Rudy was the Controller for Precision Fabrics Group, Inc., a textile spin-off of the Fortune 500 Company, Burlington Industries. In addition, she spent six years as a Certified Public Accountant and Manager for BDO Seidman, LLP, an international accounting firm. From 2012 to 2016, Ms. Rudy served as a director for Delta Apparel, Inc., a publicly-traded apparel manufacturer, where she served on the Audit and Compensation Committees. From 2008 to 2011, Ms. Rudy served as a director for First National Bank United Corporation, serving as Chair of the Audit Committee and the Assets and Liability Committee. Since 2006, Ms. Rudy has served on the Board of Visitors for Guilford College. She was also a Board Leadership Fellow in 2013, as designated by the National Association of Corporate Directors. Ms. Rudy brings to our Board extensive expertise in public company financial, compliance, and related strategic matters.


Director Independence

Our Board has determined that Ms. Rudy and Messrs. Geiss, Neal, DenBaars, McMahon, and Miller are independent directors under the applicable standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market. In reaching this determination, the Board considered Mr. Geiss’ relationship with AEG Consulting, a firm owned and operated by Mr. Geiss, which provides consulting services to the Company, as discussed below under “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions.” After consideration, the Board determined that this relationship did not impact Mr. Geiss’ ability to serve as an independent director.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our directors or executive officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

None of our directors or executive officers has been involved in any of the following events, or any of the other events specified in Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K, during the past ten years:

any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his or her involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or

being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.

Board Committees

The Board maintains three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating Committee. Each committee operates under a written charter and reports regularly to the Board. A copy of each of these committee charters is available in the “Investors” section of our website under the heading “Governance Documents” at http://www.akoustis.com and may also be obtained by submitting the “Contact Us” form at the website address set forth above. Each member of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating Committee must satisfy membership requirements imposed by the applicable committee charter and, where applicable, NASDAQ listing standards and SEC rules and regulations. Each of the members of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating Committee has been determined by the Board to be independent under applicable NASDAQ listing standards and, in the case of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee, under the independence requirements established by the SEC. A brief description of the responsibilities of each of these committees and their current membership follows.

Audit Committee 

The Audit Committee is a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board to assist the Board in its duty to oversee our accounting, financial reporting and internal control functions and the audit of our financial statements. The current members of the Audit Committee are Suzanne Rudy (Chair), Jerry Neal and Jeffrey McMahon, each of whom is independent under existing NASDAQ listing standards and SEC requirements. The Board has examined the SEC’s definition of “audit committee financial expert” and determined that Ms. Rudy is an audit committee financial expert.


Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is appointed by the Board to assist the Board in overseeing and reviewing information from management regarding compensation and human capital issues within the Company. The Compensation Committee also has specific responsibilities regarding performance reviews and compensation of the Company’s executive officers. The Compensation Committee regularly consults with members of our executive management team regarding our executive compensation program. The current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. McMahon (Chairman) and Neal and Ms. Rudy, each of whom is independent under existing NASDAQ listing standards, SEC requirements, and the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

Nominating Committee

The Nominating Committee is appointed by the Board to assist the Board in identifying individuals qualified to become Board and committee members and to recommend to the Board director nominees. The current members of the Nominating Committee are Messrs. Neal (Chairman) and DenBaars and Ms. Rudy.

Other Committees

Our Board of Directors may designate from among its members one or more other committees in the future, and in July 2017, our Board designated a Technology Committee to assist the Board and the Company’s senior management in overseeing technology development initiatives and to advise the Board regarding new technology development and execution of technology initiatives. The current members of the Technology Committee are Messrs. Geiss, DenBaars, and Miller.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. McMahon (Chairman) and Neal and Ms. Rudy. Mr. Geiss also served as a member of the Compensation Committee for a portion of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017. No member of the Compensation Committee has ever served as an officer or employee of Akoustis or had any relationship during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K, other than consulting fees paid to AEG Consulting, LLC, Mr. Geiss’ consulting firm. No executive officer of the Company has served as a director or member of the Compensation Committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any other entity, one of whose executive officers served as director of the Company during the year ended June 30, 2017.

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics and Conduct that applies to our directors, officers, and employees. A copy of the Code of Ethics and Conduct is posted on the Company’s website at www.akoustis.com. In the event that we amend any of the provisions of the Code of Ethics and Conduct that requires disclosure under applicable law or SEC rules, we intend to disclose such amendment on our website. Any waiver of the Code of Ethics and Conduct must be approved by the Board of Directors. Any waivers granted to our CEO or CFO will be disclosed on our website within four business days.

Stockholder Communications with the Board

Stockholders may communicate with the Board of Directors, members of particular committees or individual directors, by sending a letter to such persons in care of our Chief Executive Officer at our principal executive offices. The Chief Executive Officer has the authority to disregard any inappropriate communications or to take other appropriate actions with respect to any inappropriate communications. If deemed an appropriate communication, the Chief Executive Officer will submit the correspondence to the Chairman of the Board or to any committee or specific director to whom the correspondence is directed. Please note that all such communications must be accompanied by a statement of the type and amount of our securities that the person holds; any special interest, meaning an interest that is not derived from the proponent’s capacity as a shareholder, of the person in the subject matter of the communication; and the address, telephone number and e-mail address, if any, of the person submitting the communication.


Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16 of the Exchange Act requires the directors, certain officers, and beneficial owners of more than 10% of a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act to file reports with the SEC indicating their holdings of and transactions in such securities and to provide copies of such reports to the issuer of such securities.Based solely upon a review of the copies of the reports furnished to the Company, the Company believes all such reporting persons complied with such reporting obligations during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, except for a Form 3 filed on March 13, 2017 by Mark N. Tompkins.

ITEM 11.         EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

On August 11, 2016, we changed our fiscal year from a fiscal year ending on March 31 of each year to a fiscal year ending on June 30 of each year, effective for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017. Accordingly, the following table sets forth information concerning the total compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our named executive officers during (i) the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017; (ii) the three-month transition period (“TP”) from April 1, 2016 to June 30, 2016; and (iii) the year ended March 31, 2016 (our prior fiscal year).

Name and Principal
Position
 Fiscal
Year
 Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
($) (3)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
  Total
($)
 
                  
Jeffrey Shealy, 

2017 (1) 

TP 2016 

  

154,327 

42,484 

   

92,700

   

151,200

   

 9,801

2,815

   

407,938

45,299 

 
CEO 2016 (2)  150,000   30,000      5,077   185,077 
                       
Mark Boomgarden, 

2017 (1) 

TP 2016 

  139,923
36,615
   

42,024

   

84,000

   6,631
2,009
   272,578
38,624
 
VP of Operations (5) 2016 (2)  117,692   13,600   67,450   17,653   216,395 
                       
Cindy Payne, 

2017 (1) 

TP 2016 

  149,183
39,038
   

44,805

   

126,000

   7,760
2,113
   327,748
41,151
 
VP of Finance (6) 2016 (2)  114,327   13,775   217,500   4,462   350,064 
                       
Dave Aichele,                      
VP of Business 

2017 (1) 

TP 2016 

  139,923
37,143
   

42,024

   

84,000

   7,278
2,009
   273,225
39,152
 
Development 2016 (2)  121,876   13,600   165,000   4,603   305,079 

(1)Bonus amount reflected for FY 2017 was earned during the bonus period of April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2017 but paid in May 2017.

(2)Bonus amount reflected for FY 2016 was earned during the bonus period of April 1, 2015 to March 31, 2016 but paid in May 2016.


(3)See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report for a discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation of stock awards.
(4)Other compensation is presented by each executive below:

  Fiscal
Year
  401K
Contribution
($) (a)
 Contractor Compensation Total ($) 
           
Jeffrey Shealy, 2017
TP 2016
  9,801
2,815
   9,801
2,815
 
CEO 2016  5,077   5,077 
           
Mark Boomgarden, 2017
TP 2016
  6,631
2,009
   6,631
2,009
 
VP of Operations 2016  4,603 13,050 17,653 
           
Cindy Payne, 

2017

TP 2016

  7,760
2,113
   7,760
2,113
 
VP Finance 2016  4,462   4,462 
           
David Aichele,
VP of Business
 2017
TP 2016
  7,278
2,009
   7,278
2,009
 
Development 2016  4,603   4,603 

(a)Effective June 1, 2015, we established a 401(k)-retirement savings plan, with an employer matching contribution, for all employees. We have no other plans in place and have never maintained any other plans that provide for the payment of retirement benefits or benefits that will be paid primarily following retirement including, but not limited to, tax qualified deferred benefit plans, supplemental executive retirement plans, tax-qualified deferred contribution plans and nonqualified deferred contribution plans.

(5)Mr. Boomgarden served as our Vice President of Operations until his resignation, effective September 15, 2017.

(6)Ms. Payne served as our Chief Financial Officer until July 14, 2017 when she voluntarily resigned and transitioned into the position of Vice President of Finance.  Effective July 14, 2017, John T. Kurtzweil now serves as our Chief Financial Officer.

Except as indicated below under “Employment Agreements,” we have no contracts, agreements, plans or arrangements, whether written or unwritten, that provide for payments to the named executive officers listed above.


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2017 Year-End

We have equity awards outstanding under three compensation plans approved by our stockholders: the 2014 Stock Plan, the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”) and the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan). However, no further grants will be made under the 2014 Plan or the 2015 Plan. The following table provides information about outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of June 30, 2017.

    Stock Awards
Name Grant Date (1) Number of shares or
units of stock that have
not vested (#)
 Market value of shares
or units of stock that
have not vested ($) (2)
       
Jeffrey Shealy, CEO 8/11/2016 (3) 36,000 314,640
       
Mark Boomgarden, VP of Operations (5) 6/16/2014 (4) 16,204 141,623
    9/9/2014 (4) 72,918 637,303
  10/5/2015 (3) 38,000 332,120
  8/11/2016 (3) 20,000 174,800
       
Cindy Payne, VP of Finance (6) 10/5/2015 (3) 145,000 1,267,300
  8/11/2016 (3) 30,000 262,200
       
David Aichele, VP of Business Development 10/5/2015 (3) 110,000 961,400
  8/11/2016 (3) 20,000 174,800

(1)The grant date is determined in accordance with Topic 718.
(2)Based upon the $8.74 closing price of our Common Stock, as reported by NASDAQ on June 30, 2017, multiplied by the number of shares that had not yet vested.
(3)The shares granted on this date are subject to a repurchase option by the Company if the named executive officer’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company without cause, by the named executive officer for good reason, or upon the named executive officer’s permanent disability.  The shares will be released from the repurchase option as follows:  50% on the second anniversary of the grant date and 25% on each of the third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
(4)The shares granted on this date are subject to a repurchase option by the Company if the named executive officer’s employment with the Company is terminated for any reason. The remaining unvested shares will be released from the repurchase option as follows: sufficient shares such that an aggregate 75% of the original shares granted shall have vested on the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 25% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date.
(5)Mr. Boomgarden served as our Vice President of Operations until his resignation, effective September 15, 2017.
(6)Ms. Payne served as our Chief Financial Officer until July 14, 2017 when she voluntarily resigned and transitioned into the position of Vice President of Finance.  Effective July 14, 2017, John T. Kurtzweil now serves as our Chief Financial Officer.

Employment Agreements

Jeffrey B. Shealy

On June 15, 2015, we entered into a three-year employment agreement with our Chief Executive Officer, Jeffrey B. Shealy. After the initial three-year term, the agreement will be automatically renewed for successive one-year periods unless terminated by either party on at least 30 days’ written notice prior to the end of the then-current term. Mr. Shealy’s annual base salary was $150,000, subject to increase or decrease annually as determined by our Board of Directors. Effective July 4, 2016 the Board increased Mr. Shealy’s salary to $154,500. Mr. Shealy’s base salary was further increased to $163,770, effective September 11, 2017. Mr. Shealy is eligible, at the discretion of our Board of Directors, to receive an annual cash bonus of up to 100% of his annual base salary, which may be based on us achieving certain operational, financial or other milestones (the “Milestones”) that may be established by our Board of Directors. Mr. Shealy is entitled to receive stock options or other equity incentive awards under the 2016 Plan as and when determined by the Board, and is entitled to receive perquisites and other fringe benefits that may be provided to, and is eligible to participate in any other bonus or incentive program established by us for, our executives. Mr. Shealy and his dependents are also entitled to participate in any of our employee benefit plans subject to the same terms and conditions applicable to other employees. Mr. Shealy will be entitled to be reimbursed for all reasonable travel, entertainment and other expenses incurred or paid by him in connection with, or related to, the performance of his duties, responsibilities or services under his employment agreement, in accordance with policies and procedures, and subject to limitations, adopted by us from time to time.


In the event that Mr. Shealy is terminated by us without Cause (as defined in his employment agreement) or he resigns for Good Reason (as defined in his employment agreement) during the term of his employment, Mr. Shealy would be entitled to (x) an amount equal to his annual base salary then in effect (payable in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices) for a period of 24 months commencing on the effective date of his termination (the “Severance Period”) (in the case of termination by the executive for Good Reason, reduced by any cash remuneration paid to him because of any other employment or self-employment during the Severance Period), (y) if and to the extent the Milestones are achieved for the annual bonus for the year in which the Severance Period commences (or, in the absence of Milestones, our Board of Directors has, in its sole discretion, otherwise determined an amount of Mr. Shealy’s annual bonus for such year), an amount equal to such annual bonus pro-rated for the portion of the performance year completed before Mr. Shealy’s employment terminated, and (z) any unvested stock options, restricted stock or similar incentive equity instruments will vest immediately. For the duration of the Severance Period, Mr. Shealy will also be eligible to participate in our benefit plans or programs, provided Mr. Shealy was participating in such plan or program immediately prior to the date of employment termination, to the extent permitted under the terms of such plan or program (collectively, the “Termination Benefits”). If Mr. Shealy’s employment is terminated during the term by us for Cause, by Mr. Shealy for any reason other than Good Reason or due to his death, then he will not be entitled to receive the Termination Benefits, and shall only be entitled to the compensation and benefits that shall have accrued as of the date of such termination (other than with respect to certain benefits that may be available to Mr. Shealy as a result of a Permanent Disability (as defined in his employment agreement)).

John T. Kurtzweil

On July 14, 2017, the Board named John T. Kurtzweil as our new Chief Financial Officer who would also serve as the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer, effective as of the same day. In connection with the election of the new Chief Financial Officer of the Company, the Company entered into an employment agreement, dated July 14, 2017 (the “CFO Agreement”), with the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to which Mr. Kurtzweil will receive an annual base salary of $151,000, monthly living expenses of $1,600, three weeks of paid vacation each year, and reimbursement of all reasonable business, promotional, travel, and entertainment expenses incurred in the performance of his duties. In addition, Mr. Kurtzweil is also eligible to earn a target annual bonus each fiscal year equal to 70% of his annual base salary, based on certain Company operation, financial, and other milestones set by the Board and/or its Compensation Committee. Mr. Kurtzweil is also entitled to participate in any employee benefit plans and programs generally provided by the Company to its senior executives from time to time. In addition, as an inducement to employment, Mr. Kurtzweil will receive a restricted stock award for 100,000 shares of Common Stock and options for 75,000 shares of Common Stock during the Company’s next open trading window. These awards will be granted under the 2016 Plan and will vest 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date, subject to Mr. Kurtzweil’s continued employment and the terms and conditions of the 2016 Plan and the applicable award agreements.

The term of the CFO Agreement extends through July 31, 2018, and the CFO Agreement will automatically renew for successive one-year periods unless either party gives at least 30 days written notice of non-renewal to the other party prior to the end of the then applicable term.


If Mr. Kurtzweil’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. Kurtzweil for “good reason” (each as defined in the CFO Agreement), Mr. Kurtzweil will be entitled to receive: (1) continued payment of his base salary, payable in bi-weekly installments, for 12 months; (2) his annual bonus for the preceding year, if and to the extent earned and not already paid; (3) any other compensation and benefits accrued through the date of termination; and (4) reimbursement for one year after the date of termination for the cost of committed living allowance expenses and any COBRA continuation of health coverage if he elects such coverage. Any unvested stock options, restricted stock awards, or other equity awards granted by the Company to Mr. Kurtzweil will vest or be forfeited in accordance with the terms of the applicable award agreement(s).

If Mr. Kurtzweil’s employment is terminated due to his death or “disability” (as defined in the CFO Agreement), if the Company terminates Mr. Kurtzweil’s employment for “cause,” or if Mr. Kurtzweil voluntarily terminates his employment without “good reason,” Mr. Kurtzweil, his designated beneficiary, or his estate, as applicable, will be entitled to receive his base salary accrued through the date of termination. In the case of termination due to “disability” or Mr. Kurtzweil’s voluntary termination of employment, he will also be entitled to receive his annual bonus for the preceding year, if and to the extent earned and not already paid. Any unvested stock options, restricted stock awards, or other equity awards granted by the Company to Mr. Kurtzweil will vest or be forfeited in accordance with the terms of the applicable award agreement(s).

Other

On June 15, 2015, the Company also entered into two-year employment agreements with each of the Vice President of Business Development, the Vice President of Operations, and the then Chief Financial Officer. Each of these employment agreements had substantially the same terms as that of the CEO described above. These agreements expired on June 15, 2017, and each of these officers continue to serve in their respective positions, with the exception of Ms. Payne who now serves as Vice President of Finance, effective upon her voluntary resignation from the Chief Financial Officer position on July 14, 2017.

Each named executive officer’s salary is subject to increase or decrease annually as determined by our Board of Directors. Effective June 15, 2017 the Board increased the salaries of Mr. Aichele, Mr. Boomgarden and Ms. Payne to $141,080, $141,080 and $150,350, respectively. Effective September 11, 2017, Mr. Aichele’s and Ms. Payne’s base salaries were increased to $148,134 and $154,860.50, respectively.

Change in Control Arrangements

2015 Plan

In the event of a merger or change in control of the Company, the treatment of each outstanding restricted stock award granted under the 2015 Plan will be determined by the administrator of the 2015 Plan, including whether each such award will be assumed or an equivalent option or right substituted by the successor corporation. The administrator will not be required to treat all awards similarly in the transaction. In the event that the successor corporation does not assume or substitute the awards, all restrictions on the awards will lapse.

2016 Plan

Under the terms of the 2016 Plan, the following provisions will apply to the restricted stock awards granted under the 2016 Plan in the event of a change of control (except to the extent, if any, otherwise required under Code Section 409A):

To the extent that the successor or surviving company in the change of control event does not assume or substitute for an award (or in which the Company is the ultimate parent corporation and does not continue the award) on substantially similar terms or with substantially equivalent economic benefits as awards outstanding under the 2016 Plan (as determined by the administrator of the 2016 Plan), any restrictions will be deemed to have been met, and such awards will become fully vested, earned and payable to the fullest extent of the original grant of the applicable award.


In addition, in the event that an award is substituted, assumed or continued, the award will become vested in full and any restrictions will be deemed to have been met and such awards will become fully vested, earned and payable to the fullest extent of the original award, if the employment or service of the participant is terminated within two years after the effective date of a change of control if such termination of employment or service (i) is by the Company without cause or (ii) is by the participant for good reason.

Further, if a named executive officer has entered into an employment agreement or other similar arrangement as of the effective date of the 2016 Plan, the officer is entitled to the greater of the benefits provided upon a change of control of the Company under the 2016 Plan or the respective employment agreement or other similar arrangement as in effect on the 2016 Plan’s effective date, and such employment agreement or other similar arrangement will not be construed to reduce in any way the benefits otherwise provided to the officer upon a change of control as defined in the 2016 Plan.

Director Compensation

We do not have a formal director compensation program, and our directors have historically received compensation at the discretion of the Board in the form of equity awards granted under the 2015 Plan and the 2016 Plan. We also reimburse our directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses related to their role on our Board. We intend for our director compensation to align the interests of our non-employee directors with the interests of our stockholders and plan to implement a formal director compensation program for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018.

The table below summarizes all compensation received by each of the Company’s non-employee directors for services as a director performed during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.

Name Stock
awards
($)(1)
  All other compensation
($)
  Total
($)
 
          
Arthur E. Geiss (1)(2)  92,400   16,995   109,395 
             
Jerry D. Neal (1)  92,400      92,400 
             
Steven P. DenBaars (1)  92,400      92,400 
             
Jeffrey K. McMahon (1)  92,400      92,400 
             
John Kurtzweil (3)  126,500      126,500 

(1)Messrs. Geiss, Neal, DenBaars and McMahon each received a restricted stock grant under the 2015 Plan for 22,000 shares of Common Stock for Board service on August 11, 2016, with 50% of such shares scheduled to vest on the second anniversary of the grant date and 25% of such shares to vest on each of the third and fourth anniversaries of the grant dates. Valuation is based on the closing bid price of $4.20 on the grant date.
(2)Mr. Geiss received $15,195 in compensation for consulting services provided by his consulting firm, AEG Consulting, for the year ended June 30, 2017.
(3)Mr. Kurtzweil received a restricted stock grant under the 2016 Plan for 22,000 shares of common stock for Board service effective January 25, 2017, with 25% of such shares scheduled to vest on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date. The grant is valued at the closing bid price of $5.65 on the grant date. Mr. Kurtzweil resigned from the Board of Directors on July 14, 2017 in connection with his transition to the role of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. His restricted stock award will continue to vest on schedule.  


ITEM 12.        SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. In accordance with SEC rules, shares of our Common Stock that may be acquired upon exercise of stock options or warrants that are currently exercisable or that become exercisable within 60 days after September 8, 2017 (the “Determination Date”) are deemed beneficially owned by the holders of such options and warrants and are deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of any other person. Subject to community property laws, where applicable, the persons or entities named in the tables below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our Common Stock indicated as beneficially owned by them.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of the Determination Date by (i) each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our Common Stock (our only class of voting securities), (ii) each of our directors and executive officers, and (iii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. To our knowledge, none of the shares listed below are held under a voting trust or similar agreement, except as noted.

Name and address of beneficial owner 

 Amount and
nature of beneficial
ownership(1)(2)
  Percent of
class(3)
 
       
Jeffrey B. Shealy, Chief Executive Officer, Director(4)  3,300,725   17.3%
David M. Aichele, Vice President of Business Development(5)  134,250   * 
Mark Boomgarden, Vice President of Operations(6)  178,441   * 
Cindy C. Payne, VP Finance(7)  184,375   1.0%
Steven P. DenBaars, Director(8)(9)  285,858   1.5%
Arthur E. Geiss, Director, Co-Chairman of the Board(8)(10)  76,306   * 
Jeffrey K. McMahon, Director(8) (11)  551,888   2.9%
Jerry D. Neal, Director, Co-Chairman of the Board(8) (11)  367,000   1.9%
John T. Kurtzweil, Chief Financial Officer(12)  22,000   * 
Suzanne Rudy, Director  30,000   * 
Steven Miller, Director  50,000   * 
All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)(13)  5,180,843   27.12%
         
Mark Tompkins        
App 1, Via Guidino 23        
Lugano 6900, Switzerland  2,349,906   12.3%

*Less than 1%

(1)Unless otherwise indicated in the table, the address for each person named in the table is c/o Akoustis Technologies, Inc., 9805 Northcross Center Court, Suite H, Huntersville, NC 28078.

(2)Unless otherwise indicated in the table, the shares are held directly by the beneficial owner.

(3)Applicable percentage ownership is based on 19,084,583 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the Determination Date, together with securities exercisable for or convertible into shares of Common Stock within 60 days after the Determination Date, for each shareholder.


(4)Includes 36,000 restricted shares that are subject to a repurchase option.

(5)Includes 130,000 restricted shares that are subject to a repurchase option.

(6)Includes 123,626 restricted shares that are subject to a repurchase option. Mr. Boomgarden resigned from the Company, effective September 15, 2017.

(7)Includes 175,000 restricted shares that are subject to a repurchase option.

(8)Includes 20,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options.

(9)Includes 38,204 restricted shares that are subject to a repurchase option.

(10)Includes 30,914 restricted shares that are subject to a repurchase option.

(11)Includes 22,000 restricted shares that are subject to a repurchase option.

(12)Includes 22,000 restricted shares that are subject to a repurchase option.

(13)Includes 599,744 restricted shares that are subject to a repurchase option

ITEM 13.         CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

SEC rules require us to disclose any transaction or currently proposed transaction in which the Company is a participant and in which any related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest involving the lesser of $120,000.00 or one percent (1%) of the average of the Company’s total assets as of the end of last two completed fiscal years. A related person is any executive officer, director, nominee for director, or holder of 5% or more of the Company’s Common Stock, or an immediate family member of any of those persons. Set forth below is a description of such related-party transactions that occurred during the transition period.

Certain of our directors and officers participated in the 2016-2017 Offering. Specifically:

Our CEO, Jeffrey Shealy, purchased 20,000 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000 in the 2016-2017 Offering.

Mark Boomgarden, our Vice President of Operations (until his resignation, effective September 15, 2017), purchased 2,000 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $10,000 in the 2016-2017 Offering.

Jerry Neal, one of our directors and Co-Chairman of our Board of Directors, purchased 200,000 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1,000,000 in the 2016-2017 Offering.

Arthur Geiss, one of our directors and Co-Chairman of our Board of Directors, purchased 2,000 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $10,000 in the 2016-2017 Offering.

Rohan Houlden, our Divisional Vice President of Product Engineering, purchased 20,000 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000 in the 2016-2017 Offering.

In addition, James R. Shealy, brother of our Chief Executive Officer, purchased 14,000 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $70,000 in the 2016-2017 Offering. Michael J. Shealy, a second brother of our Chief Executive Officer, purchased 20,000 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000 in the 2016-2017 Offering.

AEG Consulting, a firm owned and operated by Arthur Geiss, Co-Chairman of the Board, received $15,195 for consulting fees for the year ended June 30, 2017.


Steve Miller, one of our directors, served as a Board Advisor to the Board from January 2017 through June 2017, prior to joining the Board in July 2017. In connection with his service as a Board Advisor, the Board has approved a restricted stock award for 11,000 shares of Common Stock to be granted to Mr. Miller during the next open trading window.

The Board of Directors considered the above transactions in reaching its determination regarding the independence of our directors, See “Director Independence” under “Item 10-Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.”


ITEM 14.         PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Fees

The aggregate fees billed to us by Marcum LLP, our independent registered principal accounting firm, for services rendered for (i) the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017; (ii) the transition period from April 1, 2016 to June 30, 2016; and (iii) our prior fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 are set forth in the table below:

Fee Category

 Fiscal Year
ended June 30,
2017
  Transition Period
ended June 30,
2016(1)
  Fiscal year
ended March 31,
 2016
 
          
Audit fees (2) $121,495  $65,611  $109,458 
Audit-related fees (3)  40,757   13,692   26,583 
Tax fees (4)  10,341   16,276   34,037 
All other fees         
             
Total fees $172,593  $95,579  $170,078 

(1)Fees included in the Transition period ended June 30, 2016 include the fees for the audit of the three-month transition period as well as the audit of the year ended June 30, 2016.

(2)Audit fees consist of fees incurred for professional services rendered for the audit of consolidated financial statements, for reviews of our interim consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Forms 10-Q and for services that are normally provided in connection with statutory or regulatory filings or engagements.

(3)For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, audit-related fees are related to the review of the selling stockholder registration statement related to the 2016-2017 Offering and 2017 Offering and review of the registration statement on Form S-8 for the 2016 Plan. For our prior fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, audit-related fees are related to the review of the selling stockholder registration statement related to a private placement in 2015 and review of the Form 8-K filing associated with our May 2015 merger.

(4)Tax fees consist of fees billed for tax return preparation.

Pre-Approval Practice

The Board established an Audit Committee in February 2017. The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include establishing policies and procedures for the review and pre-approval by the Audit Committee of, and approving or pre-approving, all auditing services and permissible non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm, and any non-audit services to be performed by any other accounting firm. Our Audit Committee has adopted procedures for the pre-approval of services to be performed by the independent public accountants. Pursuant to this pre-approval policy, the Audit Committee considers, at least annually, and approves the terms of the audit engagement. At each regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting, the committee members review both a report summarizing the services, provided or anticipated to be provided by the auditor and the related fees and costs, and a listing of newly requested services subject to pre-approval since its last regularly scheduled meeting. Any proposed engagement relating to permissible non-audit services must be presented to the Audit Committee and pre-approved on a case-by-case basis, prior to the performance of the auditor. In addition, particular categories of permissible non-audit services that are recurring may be pre-approved by the Audit Committee subject to preset fee limits. The Audit Committee reviews requests for the provision of audit and non-audit services by the Company’s independent public accountants and determines if they should be approved. Such requests could be approved either at a meeting of the Audit Committee or upon approval by an independent director, if such responsibility has been delegated by the Audit Committee and if approval is needed between Audit Committee meetings. Any such interim approvals must be reported to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. Prior to approving any services, the Audit Committee considers whether the provision of such services is consistent with the SEC’s and the PCAOB’s rules on auditor independence and is compatible with maintaining the independence of the Company’s public accountants.


All fees related to audit, audit-related, tax, and other permitted non-audit services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee (or the Board of Directors if prior to the establishment of the Audit Committee).


PART IV

ITEM 15.         EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Financial Statement Schedules

The consolidated financial statements of Akoustis Technologies, Inc., and its subsidiaries are listed on the Index to Financial Statements on this annual report on Form 10-K beginning on page F-1.

All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

Exhibits

The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

57 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

AKOUSTIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Dated:  September 19, 2017By:/s/ Jeffrey B. Shealy
Jeffrey B. Shealy
President and Chief Executive Officer

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SIGNATURE 

TITLEDATE
/s/ Jeffrey B. ShealyChief Executive Officer (PrincipalSeptember 19, 2017
Jeffrey B. ShealyExecutive Officer), Director
/s/ John T. KurtzweilChief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal September 19, 2017
John T. KurtzweilFinancial and Accounting Officer)
/s/ Arthur E. GeissCo-Chairman of the BoardSeptember 19, 2017
Arthur E. Geiss
/s/ Jerry D. NealCo-Chairman of the BoardSeptember 19, 2017
Jerry D. Neal
/s/ Steven P. DenBaarsDirectorSeptember 19, 2017
Steven P. DenBaars
/s/ Jeffrey K. McMahonDirectorSeptember 19, 2017
Jeffrey K. McMahon
/s/ Steven P. MillerDirectorSeptember 19, 2017
Steven P. Miller
/s/ Suzanne B. RudyDirectorSeptember 19, 2017
Suzanne B. Rudy


INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 Page
  
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial StatementsF-2
  
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial ReportingF-3
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 20172019 and June 30, 20162018F-3F-4
  
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended June 30, 20172019 and 20162018F-4F-5
  
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended June 30, 20172019 and 20162018F-5F-6
  
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 20172019 and 20162018F-6F-7
  
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-7F-8

 


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Audit Committee of the

Shareholders and Board of Directors and Shareholdersof

of Akoustis Technologies, Inc.

 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Akoustis Technologies, Inc. and SubsidiariesSubsidiary (the “Company”) as of June 30, 20172019 and 2016, and2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the two years then ended. in the period ended June 30, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended June 30, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2019, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in 2013 and our report dated September 13, 2019, expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting because of the existence of material weaknesses.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Marcumllp

Marcumllp

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.

New York, NY

September 13, 2019


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of

Akoustis Technologies, Inc.

Adverse Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Akoustis Technologies, Inc.’s (the "Company") internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2019, based on criteria established inInternal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses described in the following paragraph on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2019, based on criteria established inInternal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weaknesses have been identified and included in “Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”:

1.The Company did not design and implement effective Information Technology General Controls (“ITGC”) for certain information systems that are relevant to the preparation of the Company’s financial statements. Specifically, applications supporting the processes of payroll, cash management, fixed assets and financial close included deficiencies related to user access controls, change management, information technology operations and third party service providers.  These ITGC deficiencies, combined with inadequate compensating review controls, create a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to the consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

2.Management review controls designed to address risks associated with complex accounting matters that arise from significant routine and non-routine transactions – related to revenue, share-based compensation, research and development expense, and debt – to ensure that those transactions are properly accounted for in accordance with U.S. GAAP did not operate effectively.

These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the fiscal June 30, 2019 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated September 13, 2019 on those financial statements.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended June 30, 2019 of the Company and our report dated September 13, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying "Management Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting". Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of itseffective internal control over financial reporting.reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purposeincluded obtaining an understanding of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. Anreporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosuresincluded performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.circumstances. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion,Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Akoustis Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries, as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.statements.

 

The accompanying consolidatedBecause of the inherent limitations, internal control over financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the consolidated financial statements,risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that degree of compliance with the Company has not generated any revenue, and has incurred losses since inception. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

/s/Marcumllp

 

Marcumllp

New York, NY

September 19, 201713, 2019


Akoustis Technologies, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except per share data) 

 

  June 30,  June 30, 
  2017  2016 
       
Assets        
         
Assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $9,631,520  $4,155,444 
Inventory  188,476   43,544 
Prepaid expenses  158,457   54,818 
Other current assets  42,808    
Total current assets  10,021,261   4,253,806 
         
Property and equipment, net  7,853,814   206,985 
         
Intangibles, net  206,527   71,233 
         
Other assets  10,715   10,715 
Total Assets $18,092,317  $4,542,739 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity        
         
Current Liabilities:        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $1,336,368  $543,646 
Deferred revenue  14,500    
Total current liabilities  1,350,868   543,646 
         
Long-term Liabilities:        
Contingent real estate liability  1,730,542    
Derivative liabilities     1,322,729 
Total long-term liabilities  1,730,542   1,322,729 
         
Total Liabilities  3,081,410   1,866,375 
         
Commitments and contingencies        
         
Stockholders' Equity        
Preferred Stock, par value $0.001: 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding      
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 45,000,000 shares authorized; 19,075,050 and 15,375,981 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016, respectively  19,075   15,376 
Additional paid in capital  30,774,885   9,335,801 
Accumulated deficit  (15,783,053)  (6,674,813)
Total Stockholders' Equity  15,010,907   2,676,364 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $18,092,317  $4,542,739 

  June 30,  June 30, 
  2019  2018 
       
Assets      
       
Assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents $30,154  $14,817 
Accounts receivable  285   215 
Inventory  94   58 
Other current assets  1,288   790 
Total current assets  31,821   15,880 
         
Property and equipment, net  15,178   12,820 
         
Intangibles, net  388   264 
         
Assets held for sale, net  300   333 
         
Other assets  262   11 
Total Assets $47,949  $29,308 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity        
         
Current Liabilities:        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $3,211  $2,593 
Deferred revenue  5   53 
Total current liabilities  3,216   2,646 
         
Long-term Liabilities:        
Contingent real estate liability  445   1,230 
Convertible notes payable, net  18,215   11,465 
Other long-term liabilities  118   117 
Total long-term liabilities  18,778   12,812 
         
Total Liabilities  21,994   15,458 
         
Stockholders’ Equity        
Preferred Stock, par value $0.001: 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding      
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 45,000,000 shares authorized; 30,140,955 and 22,203,437 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018, respectively  30   22 
Additional paid in capital  93,399   52,074 
Accumulated deficit  (67,474)  (38,246)
Total Stockholders’ Equity  25,955   13,850 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $47,949  $29,308 

 

TheSee accompanying notes are an integral part of theseto the consolidated financial statementsstatements.


Akoustis Technologies, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 (In thousands, except per share data)

 

 

For the Year Ended

June 30, 2017

  

For the Year Ended

June 30, 2016

  For the Year
Ended
June 30,
2019
  For the Year
Ended
June 30,
2018
 
     
Contract research and government grants $469,532  $254,834 
             
Revenue  16,964     $1,443  $1,208 
                
Total revenue  486,496   254,834 
Cost of revenue  1,013   1,020 
        
Gross profit  430   188 
                
Operating expenses                
Research and development  4,425,778   1,758,701   19,246   13,267 
General and administrative expenses  6,019,285   2,935,299   8,701   8,804 
Loss on disposal of fixed assets  50   45 
Impairment of assets held for sale     350 
Total operating expenses  10,445,063   4,694,000   27,997   22,466 
                
Loss from operations  (9,958,567)  (4,439,166)  (27,567)  (22,278)
                
Other income (expense)        
Other income     500 
Interest income  1,936   1,339 
Bargain purchase  1,725,881     
Other (expense) income        
Interest (expense) income  (2,886)  (329)
Rental income  270   313 
Change in fair value of contingent real estate liability  785   501 
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  (877,490)  (968,840)  150   54 
Total other income (expense)  850,327   (967,001)
Total Other (expense) income  (1,681)  539 
Net loss $(9,108,240) $(5,406,167) $(29,248) $(21,739)
                
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted $(0.54) $(0.40) $(1.06) $(1.04)
                
Weighted average common shares outstanding -basic and diluted  16,990,536   13,349,482 
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted  27,512,426   20,928,235 

TheSee accompanying notes are an integral part of theseto the consolidated financial statementsstatements.

 

 F-4F-5

 

Akoustis Technologies, Inc.

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

For the Years Ended June 30, 20172019 and June 30, 20162018

                
  Common Stock  Additional  Accumulated    
  Shares  Amount  Paid In Capital  Deficit  Stockholders’ Equity 
                
Balance, July 1, 2015  12,469,084  $12,469  $5,441,260  $(1,268,646) $4,185,083 
                     
Common stock issued for cash, net of issuance costs  2,240,000   2,240   3,330,343      3,332,583 
                     
Warrants issued to underwriter        (165,719)     (165,719)
                     
Common stock issued for services  660,231   660   702,950      703,610 
                     
Common stock issued for exercise of warrants  6,666   7   9,993      10,000 
                     
Transfer of warrants from liability to equity classification        16,974      16,974 
                     
Net loss           (5,406,167)  (5,406,167)
                     
Balance, June 30, 2016  15,375,981  $15,376  $9,335,801  $(6,674,813) $2,676,364 
                     
Common stock issued for cash, net of issuance costs  2,805,000   2,805   15,381,966      15,384,771 
                     
Warrants issued to underwriter        (991,767)     (991,767)
                     
Common stock issued for services  783,000   783   4,242,314      4,243,097 
                     
Common stock issued for exercise of warrants  111,069   111   171,649      171,760 
                     
Vesting of restricted shares        434,703      434,703 
                     
Transfer of warrants from liability to equity classification        2,200,219      2,200,219 
                     
Net loss           (9,108,240)  (9,108,240)
                     
Balance, June 30, 2017  19,075,050  $19,075  $30,774,885  $(15,783,053) $15,010,907 

(In thousands)

 

  Common Stock  Additional
Paid In
  Accumulated  Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Equity 
                
Balance, June 30, 2017  19,075  $19  $31,500  $(16,507) $15,012 
                     
Common stock issued for cash, net of issuance costs  3,183   3   13,197      13,200 
                     
Warrants issued to underwriter        (646)     (646)
                     
Common stock issued for services  131      5,617      5,617 
                     
Common stock issued for exercise of warrants  18      75      75 
                     
Intrinsic value of beneficial conversion feature        1,809      1,809 
                     
Vesting of restricted shares        522      522 
                     
Repurchase and retirement of common shares  (204)            
                     
Net loss           (21,739)  (21,739)
                     
Balance, June 30, 2018  22,203  $22  $52,074  $(38,246) $13,850 
                     
Cumulative-effect adjustment from adoption of ASC 606           20   20 
                     
Common stock issued for cash, net of issuance costs  7,363   8   28,652      28,660 
                     
Common stock issued for services  291      6,684      6,684 
                     
Common stock issued for exercise of options  29      200      200 
                     
Common stock issued for exercise of warrants  92      70      70 
                     
ESPP purchase  17      99      99 
                     
Intrinsic value of beneficial conversion feature        3,951      3,951 
                     
Vesting of restricted shares        648      648 
                     
Common stock issued in payment of note interest  167      1,021      1,021 
                     
Repurchase and retirement of common shares  (21)            
                     
Net loss           (29,248)  (29,248)
                     
Balance, June 30, 2019  30,141  $30  $93,399  $(67,474) $25,955 

The

See accompanying notes are an integral part of theseto the consolidated financial statementsstatements.


Akoustis Technologies, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

  

 For the Year Ended For the Year Ended  For the Year
Ended
 For the Year
Ended
 
 June 30, 2017  June 30, 2016  June 30,
2019
  June 30,
2018
 
          
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:             
Net loss $(9,108,240) $(5,406,167) $(29,248) $(21,739)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:                
Depreciation  102,876   34,828 
Amortization of intangibles  7,208   3,339 
Share-based compensation  3,906,111   849,625 
Depreciation and Amortization  2,497   1,263 
Stock-based compensation  7,240   5,491 
Non-cash interest payments  1,017    
(Gain)/Loss on disposal of assets  (50)  45 
Impairment on assets held for sale     350 
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  877,490   968,840   (150)  (54)
Bargain purchase  (1,725,881)   
Amortization of debt discount  1,984   205 
Change in fair value of contingent real estate liability  (785)  (501)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:                
Accounts receivable  (70)  (215)
Inventory  (48,883)  (43,544)  (36)  131 
Prepaid expenses  (103,639)  4,994   (42)  (147)
Other current asset  (42,808)     (420)  (441)
Other assets  (250)  (1)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  572,644   275,116   710   1,258 
Change in other long-term liabilities     117 
Deferred revenue  14,500      (65)  38 
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities  (5,548,622)  (3,312,969)
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities  (17,668)  (14,200)
                
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:                
Cash paid for machinery and equipment  (1,625,055)  (160,172)  (4,750)  (6,942)
Cash paid for acquisition of STC-MEMS  (2,846,049)   
Cash received from assets held for sale  33    
Cash paid for intangibles  (60,729)  (43,495)  (174)  (73)
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities  (4,531,833)  (203,667)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities  (4,891)  (7,015)
                
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                
Proceeds from issuance of common stock  15,384,771   3,332,584   28,959   13,200 
Proceeds from exercise of warrants  171,760   10,000   70   75 
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities  15,556,531   3,342,584 
Proceeds received from convertible notes, net  8,867   13,125 
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities  37,896   26,400 
                
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash  5,476,076   (174,052)  15,337   5,185 
        
Cash - Beginning of Period  4,155,444   4,329,496   14,817   9,632 
        
Cash - End of Period $9,631,520  $4,155,444  $30,154  $14,817 
                
SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOW INFORMATION:                
Cash Paid During the Period for:                
Income taxes $  $  $  $ 
Interest $  $  $443  $ 
                
SUPPLEMENTARY DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                
        
Stock compensation payable $654,781  $146,016  $93  $3 
Warrants issued for stock issuance costs $991,767  $165,719  $  $646 
Reclassification of derivative liability to additional paid in capital $2,200,219  $ 
Contingent liability $1,730,542  $ 
Reclassification of fixed assets to assets held for sale, net $33  $683 
Vesting of restricted shares $648  $522 
Common stock issued in payment of note interest $1,021  $ 
Debt issuance costs included in accounts payable and accrued expenses $(30) $30 
Intrinsic value of beneficial conversion feature $3,951  $1,809 

 

TheSee accompanying notes are an integral part of theseto the consolidated financial statementsstatements.


AKOUSTIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Note 1. Organization

 

Akoustis Technologies, Inc. (formerly known as Danlax, Corp.)Inc (“the Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada U.S. on April 10, 2013. Effective December 15, 2016, the Company changed its state of incorporation from the State of Nevada to the State of Delaware. Through its subsidiaries,subsidiary, Akoustis, Inc. and Akoustis Manufacturing New York, Inc. (each a(a Delaware corporation), the Company, headquartered in Huntersville, North Carolina, is focused on developing, designing, and manufacturing innovative radio frequencyRF filter products for the mobile wireless device industry. The mission ofindustry, including for products such as smartphones and tablets, cellular infrastructure equipment, and WiFi premise equipment. Located between the Companydevice’s antenna and its digital backend, the RF front-end (“RFFE”) is to commercializethe circuitry that performs the analog signal processing and manufacture its patented BulkONE®contains components such as amplifiers, filters and switches. To construct the resonators that are the building blocks for the RF filter, we have developed a fundamentally new single-crystal acoustic wavematerials and device technology to addressmanufactured with our proprietary XBAW process. Filters are critical in selecting and rejecting signals, and their performance enables differentiation in the critical frequency-selectivity requirements in today’s mobile smartphones - improvingmodules defining the efficiency and signal quality of mobile wireless devices and enabling the Internet of Things.RFFE.

 

On August 11, 2016, the Company changed its fiscal year from the period beginning on April 1 and ending on March 31 of each year to the period beginning on July 1 and ending on June 30 of each year, effective for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.

On March 10, 2017, the Company announced that itsThe Company’s common stock was approved for listingis listed on the NASDAQNasdaq Capital Market effective March 13, 2017, under the symbol AKTS.

 

Acquisition of AssetsNote 2. Liquidity

 

On June 26, 2017, pursuant to a Definitive Asset Purchase Agreement and Definitive Real Property Purchase Agreement (collectively, the “Agreements”) with The Research Foundation for the State University of New York (“RF-SUNY”) and Fuller Road Management Corporation (“FRMC”), an affiliate of RF-SUNY, respectively, the Company completed the acquisition of certain specified assets, including STC-MEMS, a semiconductor wafer-manufacturing operation and microelectromechanical systems (“MEMS”) business with associated wafer-manufacturing tools, as well as the real estate and improvements associated with the facility located in Canandaigua, New York, which is used in the operation of STC-MEMS (the assets and real estate and improvements referred to together herein as the “STC-MEMS Business”),which was created in 2010 by RF-SUNY as an economic development project. The purpose of the initiative was to explore different technology opportunities with the goal of being a vertically integrated provider of foundry services that would offer its customers the capacity, infrastructure and operational capabilities of semiconductor and advanced manufacturing for aerospace, biomedical, communications, defense, and energy markets. Post-acquisition date, the Company also agreed to assume substantially all the on-going obligations of STC incurred in the ordinary course of business including with respect to the 29 employees employed by RF-SUNY.

The Company acquired the STC-MEMS Business through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Akoustis Manufacturing New York, Inc., (“Akoustis NY”), a Delaware corporation.

See Note 4 for a detailed description of the transaction. 


The 2016-2017 Offering

The Company sold a total of 2,142,000 shares of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) in a private placement offering (the “2016-2017 Offering”) at a fixed purchase price of $5.00 per share (the “2016-2017 Offering Price”), with closings in each of November and December 2016 and January and February 2017. The Company also sold a total of 663,000 shares of Common Stock in a private placement offering (the “2017 Offering” and together with the 2016-2017 Offering, the “Offerings”) at a fixed purchase price of $9.00 per share (the “2017 Offering Price”), with closings in May 2017. Aggregate gross proceeds from the Offerings totaled $16.7 million before deducting commissions and expenses of approximately $1.3 million. In connection with the 2016-2017 Offering, the Company also issued to the placement agents warrants to purchase an aggregate 205,126 shares of Common Stock with a term of five years and an exercise price of $5.00 per share, and in connection with the 2017 Offering, the Company issued to the placement agents warrants to purchase an aggregate 46,410 shares of Common Stock with a term of five years and an exercise price of $9.00 per share. In accordance with the terms of the subscription agreements executed by the Company and each of the investors, if the Company issues additional shares of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents (subject to customary exceptions, including but not limited to issuances of awards under Company employee stock incentive programs and certain issuances in connection with credit arrangements, equipment financings, lease arrangements, or similar transactions) between November 25, 2016 and September 4, 2017 (with respect to the 2016-2017 Offering), or between May 1, 2017 and May 1, 2019 (with respect to the 2017 Offering), for a consideration per share less than the 2016-2017 Offering Price or the 2017 Offering Price, as applicable (as adjusted for any subsequent stock dividend, stock split, distribution, recapitalization, reclassification, reorganization, or similar event) (the “Lower Price”), each investor will be entitled to receive from the Company additional shares of Common Stock in an amount such that, when added to the number of shares of Common Stock initially purchased by such investor, will equal the number of shares of Common Stock that such Investor’s investment in the applicable offering would have purchased at the Lower Price.

The March 2016 and April 2016 Offerings

On March 10, 2016, the Company held a closing of a private placement offering (the “March 2016 Offering”) in which it sold 494,125 shares of Common Stock at a fixed purchase price of $1.60 per share (the “2016 Offering Price”), for aggregate gross proceeds of $790,600 (before deducting legal expenses of $20,913 for the March 2016 Offering). 

On April 14, 2016, the Company held closings of a private placement offering (the “April 2016 Offering”) in which the Company sold 1,741,185 shares of Common Stock at a fixed purchase price of $1.60 per share (the “2016 Offering Price”), for aggregate gross proceeds of $2,785,896 (before deducting expenses of $223,000 for legal services and agent commissions of the April 2016 Offering).

Investors in the shares were given anti-dilution protection with respect to the shares of Common Stock sold in the April 2016 Offering such that if, during the period from the closing of the April 2016 Offering until 90 days after the date on which the registration statement that the Company is required to file under a Registration Rights Agreement with the  investors is declared effective by the SEC, the Company shall issue additional shares of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents (subject to customary exceptions, including but not limited to issuances of awards under the Company’s 2015 Equity Incentive Plan and certain issuances of securities in connection with credit arrangements, equipment financings, lease arrangements or similar transactions) for a consideration per share less than the 2016 Offering Price (as adjusted for any subsequent stock dividend, stock split, distribution, recapitalization, reclassification, reorganization or similar event) (the “2016 Lower Price”), each such investor will be entitled to receive from the Company additional shares of Common Stock in an amount such that, when added to the number of shares of Common Stock initially purchased by such investor, will equal the number of shares of Common Stock that such investor’s Offering subscription amount would have purchased at the 2016 Lower Price. As of mid-October 2016, the anti-dilution rights expired.

In connection with the April 2016 Offering, the Company agreed to pay the placement agents a cash commission of 8% of the gross proceeds raised from investors first contacted by the placement agents in the 2016 Offering. In addition, the placement agents received warrants to purchase a number of shares of Common Stock equal to 10% of the number of shares of Common Stock sold in the April 2016 Offering, with a term of five (5) years and an exercise price of $1.60 per share (the “2016 Placement Agent Warrants”). Any sub-agent of the placement agents that introduced investors to the 2016 April Offering was entitled to share in the cash fees and warrants attributable to those investors as described above.


Note 2. Going Concern and Management Plans

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As ofAt June 30, 2017, the Company had working capital of $8.7 million and an accumulated deficit of $15.8 million. Since inception, the Company has recorded approximately $892,000 of revenue from contract research and government grants. As of June 30, 2017,2019, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $9.6$30.2 million whichand working capital of $28.6 million. The Company has historically incurred recurring operating losses and has experienced net cash used in operating activities of $17.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2019.

As of September 06, 2019, the Company believes is sufficient to fund its current operations through December 2017. As a result, we will need to obtain additional capital through the sale of additional equity securities, debt and additional grants, or otherwise, to fund operations past that date. The Company is actively managing and controlling the Company’s cash outflows to mitigate these risks, these matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset amounts or the classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company had $6.7$24.5 million of cash and cash equivalents, on hand as of September 8, 2017which funds are expected to fund its business.

There is no assurance that the Company’s projections and estimates are accurate. The Company’s primary sources of funds for operations since inception have been private equity, note financings and grants. The Company needs to obtain additional capital to accomplish its business plan objectives and will continue its efforts to secure additional funds through issuance of debt or equity instruments and/or receipts of grants as appropriate. However, the amount of funds raised, if any, may not be sufficient to enablefund our operations beyond the next twelve months from the date of filing of this Form 10-K. These funds will be used to fund the Company’s operations, including capital expenditures, R&D, commercialization of our technology, development of our patent strategy and expansion of our patent portfolio, as well as to provide working capital and funds for other general corporate purposes. However, the Company has no commitments to attain profitable operations. To the extent that the Company is unsuccessful in obtainingobtain any additional financing, the Company may need to curtail or cease its operationsfunds, and implement a plan to extend payables or reduce overhead until sufficient additional capital is raised to support further operations. Therethere can be no assurance that such a planfunds will be successful.available on acceptable terms or at all. If the Company is unable to obtain additional financing in a timely fashion and on acceptable terms, its financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected and it may not be able to continue operations or execute its stated commercialization plan. However, the Company can mitigate this risk by actively managing and controlling cash outflows.

 

Note 3. Summary of significant accounting policies

 

Basis of presentation

 

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). 

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries,subsidiary, Akoustis, Inc. and Akoustis Manufacturing New York, Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Use of estimates and assumptions

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

  


Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:

 

 (1)Fair value of long–lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long–lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long–lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under–performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

 (2)Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–carry forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the NOL carry–carry forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company’s incurrence of losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) other factors.

 

 (3)Estimates and assumptions used in valuation of equity instruments: Management estimates expected term of share options and similar instruments, expected volatility of the Company’s common shares and the method used to estimate it, expected annual rate of quarterly dividends, and risk-free rate(s) to value share options and similar instruments.

 

 (4)Estimates and assumptions used in valuation of derivative liability:liabilities: Management utilizes a binomial option pricing modelMonte Carlo simulation to estimate the fair value of derivative liabilities. Theliabilities, and utilizes the with-and-without method, a form of the income approach model includesto compute the fair value of its embedded derivatives associated with its convertible note. These models include subjective assumptions that can materially affect the fair value estimates.

 

 (5)Estimates and assumptions used in business combinations: The accounting for business combinations requires estimates and judgments as to expectations for future cash flowsvaluation of the acquired business, and the allocation of those cash flows to identifiable intangible assets, in determining the estimated fair value for assets and liabilities acquired.contingent real estate liability: The fair value measurement is highly sensitive to significant changes inof the unobservable inputscontingent liability was calculated by an independent third-party appraisal firm, utilizing a present value calculation based on the probability the Company sells the property triggering the contingent penalty which management estimates, and significant increases (decreases) ina discount rate.  The discount rate or decreases (increases) in price/earnings multiples would result inwas derived from a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. The fair values assignedweighted average cost of capital, modified to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on management’s estimates and assumptions, including valuations that utilize customary valuation procedures and techniques. Ifinclude the actual results differ from the estimates and judgments used in these estimates, the amounts recorded in the financial statements could result in a possible impairmenteffects of the acquired assets. bargain purchase price, and assumes a percentage chance of real estate sale.

 

These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

 

Management bases its estimates on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates.


Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash deposits. The Company maintains its cash in institutions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). At times, the Company’s cash and cash equivalent balances may be uninsured or in amounts that exceed the FDIC insurance limits; as of June 30, 20172019, approximately $9.4$29.9 million was uninsured.


Inventory

 

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or marketnet realizable value using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) valuation method. Inventory was comprised of the following at June 30, 2017 and 2016:

  June 30, 2017  June 30, 2016 
Finished goods held for resale $49,374  $43,544 
Raw materials  139,102    
  $188,476  $43,544 

 

Property and equipment, net

 

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated using the straight–line method on the various asset classes over their estimated useful lives, which range from threetwo to teneleven years. Expenditures for major renewals and betterments that extend the useful lives of property and equipment are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs, which do not extend the economic useful life of the related assets, are charged to operations as incurred. The Company records gains or losses on the disposal of assets as the difference between net book value of assets and cash received less costs to dispose of assets. Gains or losses on the disposal of assets, as well as impairment of assets held for sale are recorded in operating expenses.

 

Intangible assets, net

 

Intangible assets consist of patents, trademarks and trademarks.customer relationships. Applicable long–lived assets are amortized or depreciated over the shorter of their estimated useful lives, the estimated period that the assets will generate revenue, or the statutory or contractual term in the case of patents. Estimates of useful lives and periods of expected revenue generation are reviewed periodically for appropriateness and are based upon management’s judgment. Patents are amortized on the straight-line method over their useful lives of 15 years.

  

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets, including property and equipment, when there are indications that the assets might be impaired. When evaluating assets for potential impairment, the Company compares the carrying value of the asset to its estimated undiscounted future cash flows.  If an asset’s carrying value exceeds such estimated undiscounted cash flows, the Company records an impairment charge for the difference between the carrying amount of the asset and its fair value.

 

Based on its assessments of equipment that is no longer needed as part of the XBAW single crystal manufacturing process, the Company did not record anyrecorded $0.4 million of impairment charges on assets held for sale for the yearsyear ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.2018.


Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

 

The Company measures the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on the guidance of ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. 

    

ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.


Fair value measurements are categorized using a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs used to measure fair value, which prioritize the inputs into three broad levels:

 

Level 1 - Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

 

Level 2 - Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date, and include those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies.

 

Level 3 - Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.

 

Derivative Liability

 

The Company evaluates its options, warrants, convertible notes, or other contracts, if any, to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with paragraph 815-10-05-4 and Section 815-40-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as either an asset or a liability. The change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion, exercise or cancellation of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the date of conversion, exercise or cancellation and then the related fair value is reclassified to equity.

 

In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.

 

The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

 

The Company adopted Section 815-40-15 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 815-40-15”) to determine whether an instrument (or an embedded feature) is indexed to the Company’s own stock.  Section 815-40-15 provides that an entity should use a two-step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions.

 

The Company utilizes a binomial option pricing modelMonte Carlo simulation to compute the fair value of the derivative liability and to mark to market the fair value of the derivative at each balance sheet date. The Company records the change in the fair value of the derivative as other income or expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

 

Revenue Recognition

Change in Accounting Policy for Revenue Recognition

Effective October 1, 2016, the Company changed its accounting policy for the recognition of grant revenue. The Company believes thisutilizes the with-and-without method, a form of the income approach model to compute the fair value of its embedded derivatives associated with its convertible note. The fair value of the embedded derivatives represents the difference in the present value of anticipated cash flows assuming the feature is present as compared to a security without the same feature. The Company records the change in accounting policy is preferable due to the fact that grant revenue is viewed as an ongoing function of its intended operations. This change in accounting policy also enhances the comparabilityfair value of the Company’s financial statements with many of its industry peers. The adoption of this accounting policy change has been applied retrospectively to all prior periods presentedderivative as other income or expense in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and has had no impact on net loss per share.


Contract Research and Government Grants

The Company may generate revenue from product sales, license agreements, collaborative research and development arrangements, and government grants. To date the Company’s principal source of revenue consists of government research grants. The Company recognizes nonrefundable grant revenue when it is received and reports this revenue as “Contract research and government grants” on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Contracts executed and monies received prior to the recognition of revenue are recorded as deferred revenue.

Engineering Review Services

The Company records Engineering Review Services revenue (“ERS”) which is for providing one time design and development services whereby the Company’s R&D personnel deliver simulations/models and demonstration units (low volume) for evaluation by the customers. The Company recognizes revenue when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the service has been provided to the customer, the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable, and the collection of fees is reasonably assured. Total ERS revenue to date is approximately $14,500.

Revenue Recognition for Facility Rental Income

Effective June 26, 2017, the Company records rental income for the tenants at the Company’s NY fabrication facility. The Company recognizes rental income in the period the rental services are delivered to the lessee; rent is received on a monthly, straight-line basis.


Research and Development

 

Research and development expenses are charged to operations as incurred.

 

Equity–Stock–based compensation

 

The Company recognizes compensation expense for all equity–based payments in accordance with ASC 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation”. Under fair value recognition provisions, the Company recognizes equity–based–based compensation net of an estimated forfeiture rateactual forfeitures and recognizes compensation cost only for those shares expected to vest over the requisite service period of the award.

 

Restricted stock awards are granted at the discretion of the Company. These awards are restricted as to the transfer of ownership and generally vest over the requisite service periods, typically over a four-yearperiod (generally vesting either ratably over the first four years or on a tier basis of 50% on the second anniversary of the effective date and 25% on the third and fourth anniversary dates). The fair value of a stock award is equal to the fair market value of a share of Company stock on the grant date.

 

The fair value of an option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black–Scholes option valuation model. The Black–Scholes option valuation model requires the development of assumptions that are inputs into the model. These assumptions are the value of the underlying share, the expected stock volatility, the risk–free interest rate, the expected life of the option, and the dividend yield on the underlying stock and the expected forfeiture rate.stock. Expected volatility is benchmarked against similar companies in a similar industry overcalculated using the expected option life and other appropriate factors.historical volatilities of the Company’s common stock traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market. Risk–free interest rates are calculated based on continuously compounded risk–free rates for the appropriate term. The dividend yield is assumed to be zero as the Company has never paid or declared any cash dividends on its Common stock and does not intend to pay dividends on its Common stock in the foreseeable future. The expected forfeiture rate is estimated based on management’s best estimate.Company accounts for the impact of forfeitures as they occur.


Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of equity–based payment awards requires the input of the subjective assumptions described above. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of equity–based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, which involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, equity–based compensation could be materially different in the future. In addition, the Company is required to estimateaccount for the expected forfeiture rate and recognize expense only forimpact of forfeitures as those shares expected to vest.forfeitures occur. If the Company’s actual forfeiture rate is materially different from its estimate,forfeitures are material, the equity–based compensation could be significantly different from what the Company has recorded in the current period.

 

The Company accounts for share–based payments granted to non–employees in accordance with ASC 505-40, “Equity Based Payments to Non–Employees”. The Company determines the fair value of the stock–based payment as either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. If the fair value of the equity instruments issued is used, it is measured using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of either (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, or (2) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete. The fair value of the equity instruments is re-measured each reporting period over the requisite service period.


Income taxes

 

TheIn determining income for financial statement purposes, the Company appliesmust make certain estimates and judgments in the elementscalculation of ASC 740–10 “Income Taxestax expense, the resultant tax liabilities, and in the recoverability of deferred tax assets that arise from temporary differences between the tax and financial statement recognition of revenue and expense.

As part of the financial process, the Company assesses on a tax jurisdictional basis the likelihood that the Company’s deferred tax assets can be recovered. If recovery is not more likely than not (a likelihood of less than 50 percent), the provision for taxes must be increased by recording a reserve in the form of a valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets that are estimated not to ultimately be recoverable. In this process, certain relevant criteria are evaluated including: the amount of income or loss in prior years, the existence of deferred tax liabilities that can be used to absorb deferred tax assets, future expected taxable income, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. Changes in taxable income, market conditions, U.S. or international tax laws, and other factors may change the Company’s judgment regarding accounting for uncertaintywhether the Company will be able to realize the deferred tax assets. These changes, if any, may require material adjustments to the net deferred tax assets and an accompanying reduction or increase in income taxes. This clarifies the accounting for uncertaintytax expense which will result in income taxes recognizeda corresponding increase or decrease in financial statements and requires the impact of a tax position to be recognizednet income in the period when such determinations are made.

As part of the Company’s financial statements ifprocess, the Company also assess the likelihood that positionthe Company’s tax reporting positions will ultimately be sustained. To the extent it is determined it is more likely than not (a likelihood of beingmore than 50 percent) that some portion or all of a tax reporting position will ultimately not be recognized and sustained, by the taxing authority. As of March 31, 2017, no liabilitya provision for unrecognized tax benefits was requiredbenefit is provided by either reducing the applicable deferred tax asset or accruing an income tax liability. The Company’s judgment regarding the sustainability of the Company’s tax reporting positions may change in the future due to be reported. The Company does not expect thatchanges in U.S. or international tax laws and other factors. These changes, if any, may require material adjustments to the amount of unrecognizedrelated deferred tax benefitsassets or accrued income tax liabilities and an accompanying reduction or increase in income tax expense which will significantlyresult in a corresponding increase or decrease withinin net income in the next twelve months.period when such determinations are made. The Company’s policy is to recognizeCompany recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax matterspositions in the income tax provision on the Statement of Operations. There was no interestselling, general and penalties for the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.administrative expenses.

 

Deferred taxes are computed based on the tax liability or benefit in future years of the reversal of temporary differences in the recognition of income or deduction of expenses between financial and tax reporting purposes. The net difference, if any, between the provision for taxes and taxes currently payable is reflected in the balance sheet as deferred taxes. Deferred tax assets and/or liabilities, if any, are classified as current and non–current based on the classification of the related asset or liability for financial reporting purposes, or based on the expected reversal date for deferred taxes that are not related to an asset or liability. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets to that amount which is more likely than not to be realized. 

Loss Per Share

 

Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share is determined using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents. In periods when losses are reported, which is the case for the years ended June 30, 20172019 and 20162018 presented in these consolidated financial statements, the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding excludes common stock equivalents because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

 

The Company had the following common stock equivalents at June 30, 20172019 and 2016:2018:

 

  June 30, 2017  June 30, 2016  June 30,
2019
  June 30,
2018
 
Convertible Notes  4,960,800   2,290,077 
Options   160,000   160,000   2,127,317   1,338,859 
Warrants   612,165   471,697   633,343   748,572 
Totals   772,165   631,697 
Total  7,721,460   4,377,508 

Shares Outstanding

 

Shares outstanding include shares of restricted stock with respect to which restrictions have not lapsed. Restricted stock included in reportable shares outstanding was 1,646,965265,000 shares and 1,361,055734,561 shares as of June 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. Shares of restricted stock are included in the calculation of weighted average shares outstanding.

Reclassification

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. The reclassifications did not have an impact on net loss as previously reported.


Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Effective

In July 2015,February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” with multiple amendments subsequently issued, which will require that lease arrangements be presented on the lessee’s balance sheet by recording a right-of-use asset and a lease liability equal to the present value of the related future minimum lease payments. This standard will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. The Company plans to elect the optional transition method that allows lessees to apply the new guidance as of the adoption date and recognize any cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. Upon adoption, the Company expects to elect the transition package of practical expedients which allows the Company (1) to not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are leases, or contain leases, (2) to not reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases, and (3) to not reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases. Further, upon implementation of the new guidance, the Company intends to elect the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all leases and account for the combined lease and non-lease components as a single lease component. The Company also plans to make an accounting policy election to exclude leases with an initial term of 12 months or less from the balance sheet. The Company expects to record a right-of-use asset and lease liability for substantially all operating lease arrangements, which is expected to approximate the present value of the Company’s future minimum lease obligations pertaining to its operating leases as disclosed in Note 11. Any new lease arrangements or material modifications entered into subsequent to the adoption date will be accounted for in accordance with the new standard. The new guidance will not have a significant impact on its Consolidated Statements of Operations or its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.  

In June 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2015-11 “2018-07,InventoryCompensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 330)718): SimplifyingImprovements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. Under the Measurement of Inventory” (“new standard, companies will no longer be required to value non-employee awards differently from employee awards. Companies will value all equity classified awards at their grant-date under ASC718 and forgo revaluing the award after the grant date. ASU 2015-11”). The amendments in this Update do not apply to inventory that2018-07 is measured using last-in, first-out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method. The amendments apply to all other inventory, which includes inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost. An entity should measure inventory within the scope of this update at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory measured using LIFO or the retail inventory method.For public business entities, the amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2015-11 on the consolidated financial statements.  

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes”, which will require entities to present deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. The ASU simplifies the current guidance, which requires entities to separately present deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. The ASU may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and2018, including interim reporting periods within those annual periods. Earlier application is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annualthat reporting period. The Company is currently evaluatingplans to adopt during the effectsfirst interim reporting period of ASU 2015-17fiscal year 2020 and does not believe it will have a significant impact on theits consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business” which clarifies the definition of a business and provides further guidance for evaluating whether a transaction will be accounted for as an acquisition of an asset or a business. The Company adopted ASU 2017-01 in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and there was no impact to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force)” which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. The Company adopted ASU 2016-15 in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. The Company’s historical policies were consistent with the guidance in this standard, and therefore, there was no impact to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.  

 

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial“Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. The update addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, which affects the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities measured under the fair value option and presentation and disclosure ofrequirements for financial instruments. For public business entities,In addition, the amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted only for certain portions of the ASUFASB clarified guidance related to financial liabilities.the assessment of valuation allowances when recognizing deferred tax assets related to unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. The Company is currently evaluatingadopted ASU 2016-01 in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and there was no material impact ofto the provisions of this new standard on the consolidated financial statements. 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases(Topic 842). The FASB issued this update to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the update is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new standard.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation” (Topic 718). The FASB issued this update to improve the accounting for employee share-based payments and affect all organizations that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. Several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions are simplified, including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the statement of cash flows. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the update is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new standard.Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.  


In April 2016,May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10,“Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing (Topic 606)”. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross verses Net) (Topic 606)”. These amendments provide additional clarification and implementation guidance on the previously issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”Customers (Topic 606),” with several amendments subsequently issued, which provided an updated framework for revenue recognition, resulting in a single revenue model to be applied by reporting companies under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). The amendments in ASU 2016-10 provide clarifying guidance on materialityUnder this model, recognition of performance obligations; evaluating distinct performance obligations; treatment of shipping and handling costs; and determining whether an entity’s promise to grant a license providesrevenue occurs when a customer with eitherobtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Company adopted ASU 2014-09 in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 for open contracts using the modified retrospective approach through a rightcumulative adjustment to use an entity’s intellectual property or a right to access an entity’s intellectual property. The amendments“Accumulated deficit” in ASU 2016-08 clarify how an entity should identify the specified good or serviceConsolidated Balance Sheet for the principal versus agent evaluation and how it should applyfiscal year beginning July 1, 2018. The impact from the control principle to certain types of arrangements. The adoption of ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-08 is to coincide with an entity’s adoption of ASU 2014-09, which the Company intends to adopt for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017.cumulative-effect adjustment was $20 thousand. The Company is inimplemented changes to its accounting policies, internal controls and disclosures (footnote 4) to support the process of evaluating the standard and does not expect the adoption will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12,“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients”,which narrowly amended the revenue recognition guidance regarding collectability, noncash consideration, presentation of sales tax and transition and is effective during the same period as ASU 2014-09. The Company is currently evaluating the standard and does not expect the adoption will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”. This update provides guidance on how to record eight specific cash flow issues. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted and a retrospective transition method to each period should be presented. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of this update on its consolidated financial statements.new standard.

  

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18,“Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)”, requiring that the statement of cash flows explain the change in the total cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. The provisions of this guidance are to be applied using a retrospective approach which requires application of the guidance for all periods presented. The Company is currently evaluatingCompany’s historical policies were consistent with the guidance in this standard, and therefore, there was no impact ofto the new standard.Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.  

 

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting,”which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-basedstock-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. This standard is required to be adopted in the first quarter of 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidancedoes not believe it will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.statements.   

 

In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features; II. Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception”. Part I of this update addresses the complexity of accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features. Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced on the basis of the pricing of future equity offerings. Current accounting guidance creates cost and complexity for entities that issue financial instruments (such as warrants and convertible instruments) with down round features that require fair value measurement of the entire instrument or conversion option. Part II of this update addresses the difficulty of navigating Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, because of the existence of extensive pending content in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This pending content is the result of the indefinite deferral of accounting requirements about mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of certain nonpublic entities and certain mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests. The amendments in Part II of this update do not have an accounting effect. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2017-11 will haveadopted this update during Q4 of fiscal year 2018 with no impact on its financial statementsstatements. 

In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-05,“Income Taxes (Topic 740): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118.”The amendments incorporate into the ASC the recent SEC guidance related to the income tax accounting implications of the Tax Cuts and relatedJobs Act (the “Tax Act”). See Note 13 for further disclosures.


Note 4. Acquisition of STC-MEMSRevenue Recognition from Contracts with Customers

 

AcquisitionEffective as of STC-MEMSJuly 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASC 606”). The core principle of ASC 606 requires that an entity recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASC 606 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, it is possible more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than required under existing U.S. GAAP including identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation.

 

On March 23, 2017,To achieve this core principle, the Company entered intoapplies the Agreementsfollowing five steps:

Step l - Identify the Contract withRF-SUNY, the Customer - A contract exists when (a) the parties to the contract have approved the contract and are committed to perform their respective obligations, (b) the entity can identify each party’s rights regarding the goods or services to be transferred, (c) the entity can identify the payment terms for the goods or services to be transferred, (d) the contract has commercial substance and (e) it is probable that the entity will collect substantially all of the consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for the goods or services that will be transferred to the customer.

Step 2 - Identify Performance Obligations in the Contract - Upon execution of a New York State education corporation, on behalf of The State University of New York Polytechnic Institute, and FRMC, an affiliate of RF-SUNY to acquire the STC-MEMS Business. The acquisition will allowcontract, the Company identifies as performance obligations each promise to internalize manufacturing, increase capacitytransfer to the customer either (a) goods or services that are distinct or (b) a series of distinct goods or services that are substantially the same and control its wafer supply chainhave the same pattern of transfer to the customer. To the extent a contract includes multiple promised goods or services, the Company must apply judgement to determine whether the goods or services are capable of being distinct within the context of the contract. If these criteria are not met, the goods or services are accounted for single crystal BAW RF filters. Akoustis will utilizeas a combined performance obligation. The Company considers the NY Facilityperformance obligation in a product sale to consolidate all aspectsbe title transfer of wafer manufacturing for its high-band RF filters.the specified product to the customer. The transfer of title occurs according to the purchase order (contract) specification. The Company considers performance obligations related to foundry fabrication services to be title transfer of the specified product or prototype to the customer. The transfer of title occurs according to the purchase order (contract) specification. In the absence of title transfer language, transfer occurs at the time of shipment.

 

Smart Systems Technology & Commercialization Center (STC-MEMS) was createdStep 3 - Determine the Transaction Price - The transaction price is determined based on the consideration to which the Company will be entitled in 2010exchange for transferring products or services to formthe customer. Generally, all contracts include fixed consideration. If a vertically integrated “one-stop-shop”contract did include variable consideration, the Company would determine the amount of variable consideration that should be included in smart systemthe transaction price based on the expected value method. Variable consideration would be included in the transaction price, if in the Company’s judgement, it is probable that a significant future reversal of cumulative revenue under the contract would not occur.

Step 4 - Allocate the Transaction Price - After the transaction price has been determined, the next step is to allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation in the contract. If the contract only has one performance obligation, the entire transaction price will be applied to that obligation. If the contract has multiple performance obligations, the transaction price is allocated to the performance obligations based on the relative standalone selling price (SSP) at contract inception.


Step 5 - Satisfaction of the Performance Obligations (and Recognition of Revenue) - When an asset is transferred, and smart-device innovationthe customer obtains control of the asset (or the services are rendered), the Company recognizes revenue. At contract inception, the Company determines if each performance obligation is satisfied at a point in time or over time. The Company will recognize sales of its product in the period that title of the product is transferred to the customer. The Company will evaluate foundry fabrication services contracts on a case by case basis as they vary with regards to enforceable right and manufacturing. alternative use. If an unrestricted, enforceable right and no alternative use exists, the Company will recognize revenue over time utilizing the input method which the Company considers to be the best method of measuring progress toward complete satisfaction of the performance obligation. However, if either of these does not exist, the Company will recognize revenue at a point in time based on title transfer of the final prototype or specified product.

Disaggregation of Revenue

The facility was designedCompany’s primary revenue streams include foundry fabrication services and product sales.

Foundry Fabrication Services

Foundry fabrication services revenue includes microelectromechanical systems (“MEMS”) foundry services and Non-Recurring Engineering (“NRE”). Under these contracts, products are delivered to provide its customers the capacity, infrastructure and operational capabilities in all areascustomer at the completion of semiconductor and advanced manufacturing, while covering a diverse numberthe service which represents satisfaction of markets including aerospace, biomedical, communications, defense, and energy. Located in Canandaigua, New York, just outside of Rochester, the STC-MEMS facility includes certified cleanroom manufacturing, advanced test and metrology,performance obligation as well as change of control. Depending on language with regards to enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date, related revenue will either be recognized over time or at a MEMS and optoelectronic packaging facility.point in time.

 

The Company acquired the STC-MEMS Business through its Akoustis NY, a Delaware corporation. Post-acquisition date, the Company also agreed to assume substantially all the on-going obligations of the STC-MEMS Business incurred in the ordinary course of business, including with respect to the 29 employees employed by RF-SUNY.  The purchase closed on June 26, 2017.

Product Sales

 

Acquisition Price

The purchase price paid for the transaction was an aggregateProduct sales revenue consists of approximately $4.58 million consistingsales of (i) $2.75 million in cash consideration, (ii) $96,000 in inventory,RF filters and (iii) a contingent real estate liability of approximately $1.73 million.

Recognizing and measuring the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree

The fair value of the purchase consideration issued to the sellers of the STC-MEMS Business was allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. The Company accounted for the STC-MEMS Business acquisition as the purchase of a business under GAAP under the acquisition method of accounting, as specified in ASC 805 “Business Combinations”,amps which are sold with contract terms stating that title passes, and the assetscustomer takes control at the time of shipment. Revenue is then recognized when the devices are shipped, and liabilities acquired were recorded as of the acquisition date, at their respective fair values and consolidated with those of the Company. The fair value of the net assets acquired was approximately $6.3 million. The excess of the aggregate fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets over the consideration paidperformance obligation has been treated as a gain on bargain purchase in accordance with ASC 805. The purchase price allocation was based, in part, on management’s knowledge ofsatisfied. If devices are sold under contract terms that specify that the STC-MEMS Business andcustomer does not take ownership until the results of a third-party appraisal commissioned by management.

The Company utilizedgoods are received, revenue is recognized when the services of an independent appraisal company to assist it in assessingcustomer receives the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired. This assessment included an evaluation of the fair value of the real estate and fixed assets in addition to the intangibles acquired. The real estate was valued utilizing a combination of the income and cost approaches.  The fixed assets were valued utilizing a combination of the market and cost approaches.  The intangible asset, customer relationships, was valued utilizing the income approach. The valuation process also included discussion with management regarding the history and business operations of the STC-MEMS Business, a study of the economic and industry conditions in which the STC-MEMS Business competes and an analysis of the historical and projected financial statements and other records and documents. 

Recognizing and measuring goodwill or a gain from a bargain purchase

Management reviewed the assets and liabilities acquired and the assumptions utilized in estimating their fair values. Further revisions to the estimates were not deemed necessary and after identifying and valuing all assets and liabilities of the STC-MEMS Business, the Company concluded that recording a bargain purchase gain was appropriate and required under GAAP.


Purchase Consideration   
    
Amount of consideration: $4,576,591 
     
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value    
Land $1,000,000 
Building  3,000,000 
STC-MEMS equipment  2,124,650 
Inventory  96,049 
Customer relationships  81,773 
Net assets acquired $6,302,472 
     
Total net assets acquired $6,302,472 
Consideration paid  4,576,591 
Gain on bargain purchase $1,725,881 

Prior to this transaction, none of the parties negotiating on behalf of the Company had met any of the individuals negotiating on behalf of the sellers. Further, there were no agreements signed with any individuals negotiating this deal. Additionally, there were no related parties associated with this transaction.goods.

 

The following presentstable summarizes the unaudited pro-forma combined results of operationsrevenues of the Company withCompany’s reportable segments for the STC-MEMS Business as if the entities were combined on July 1, 2015.year ended June 30, 2019, (in thousands):

 

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  June 30,  June 30, 
  2017  2016 
Revenues, net $4,195,374  $5,314,499 
Net (loss) allocable to common shareholders $(13,907,072) $(7,613,100)
Net (loss) per share $(0.82) $(0.57)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding  16,990,536   13,349,482 

  Foundry
Fabrication 
Services
Revenue
  Product Sales
Revenue
  Total Revenue
with
Customers
 
MEMS $540     $540 
NRE - RF Filters  518      518 
Filters/Amps     276   276 
Total $1,058  $276  $1,334 

  

The unaudited pro-forma results of operations are presented for information purposes only. The unaudited pro-forma results of operations are not intended to present actual results that would have been attained had the acquisitions been completed as of July 1, 2015 or to project potential operating results as of any future date or for any future periods.


The estimated useful life remaining on equipment and building acquired with the STC-MEMS Business is 3 to 5 years and 11 years, respectively.Performance Obligations

 

The Company consolidated Akoustis NY ashas determined that contracts for product sales revenue and foundry fabrication services revenue involve one performance obligation, which is delivery of the closing datefinal product.

Contract Balances

The Company records a receivable when the title for goods has transferred. Generally, all sales are contract sales (with either an underlying contract or purchase order), resulting in all receivables being contract receivables. When invoicing occurs prior to revenue recognition a contract liability is recorded (as deferred revenue on the Consolidated Balance Sheet).


The following table summarizes the changes in revenue recognition for the year ended June 30, 2019, (in thousands):

  Deferred
Revenue
 
Balance, June 30, 2018 $53 
Revenue recognized from prior year  (53)
Year to date invoicing in excess of revenue recognition  5 
Balance, June 30, 2019 $5 

Additionally, when revenue recognition occurs prior to invoicing, a contract asset is recognized.

The following table summarizes the changes in contract assets, included in Other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, for the year ended June 30, 2019:

  Contract
assets
 
Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 
Year to date revenue recognition in excess of billings  140 
Balance, June 30, 2019 $140 

Backlog of Remaining Customer Performance Obligations

Revenue expected to be recognized and recorded as sales during the agreement, andnext fiscal year from the resultsbacklog of operations ofperformance obligations that are unsatisfied (or partially unsatisfied) was $0.5 million at June 30, 2019.

Grant Revenue

From time to time the Company include that of Akoustis NY.applies for grants from various government bodies (state & federal), such as the National Science Foundation (“NSF”), to support research and development. In addition, the Company is eligible for “matching awards” from state boards to provide additional funds to the Company to supplement the funds awarded under the federal grant program. The Company recognized net revenues attributablerecords grant revenue as a part of revenue from operations due to Akoustis NYthe fact that grant revenue is viewed as an ongoing function of $0 and recognized net losses of $171,000 duringits intended operations. The Company recorded $109 thousand in grant revenue for the period June 26, 2017 throughyear ended June 30, 2017; driven by wages2019. The revenue from grants is not viewed as “incidental” or “peripheral” which would result in the presentation of grant revenue as “Other income”. The Company recognizes nonrefundable grant revenue when the performance obligations have been met, application has been submitted and fringe benefits of $126,000.approval is reasonably assured.


Note 5. Propertyand equipment

 

Property and equipment consisted of the following:following as of June 30, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):

 

  Estimated
Useful Life
 June 30,
2017
  June 30,
2016
 
Land n/a $1,000,000  $ 
Research and development equipment 3 – 10 years  1,851,427   226,372 
Computer equipment 5 years  16,783   16,783 
Furniture and fixtures 5 – 10 years  3,725   3,725 
STC-MEMS equipment 3 – 5 years  2,124,650    
Building 11 years  3,000,000    
Leasehold improvements *  3,240   3,240 
     7,999,825   250,120 
Less: Accumulated depreciation    (146,011)  (43,135)
Total   $7,853,814  $206,985 
  June 30,
2019
  June 30,
2018
  Estimated
Useful Life
Land $1,000  $1,000  n/a
Building  3,000   3,000  11 years
Equipment  13,611   9,126  2-10 years
Leasehold Improvements  949   885  *
Software  161   42  3 years
Furniture & Fixtures  11   14  5 years
Computer Equipment  203   117  3 years
Total  18,935   14,184   
Less: Accumulated depreciation  (3,757)  (1,364)  
Total $15,178  $12,820   

  

(*) AmortizedLeasehold improvements which are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter.

 

The Company recorded depreciation expense of $102,876$2,447 thousand and $34,828$1,248 thousand for the years ended June 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.

 

As of June 30, 2017, research and development fixed assets2019, equipment with a net book value totaling $1,062,496$2,582 thousand were not placed in service and therefore not depreciated during the period. As of June 30, 2018, fixed assets with a net book value totaling $436 thousand were not placed in service and therefore not depreciated during the period.

 

F-18

Note 6. Intangible assets

The Company’s intangible assets consisted of the following:

  Estimated 
useful life
  June 30, 2017  June 30, 2016 
Patents  15 years  $135,291  $74,562 
Customer relationships  14 years   81,773    
Less: Accumulated amortization      (12,097)  (4,889)
Subtotal      204,967   69,673 
Trademarks  —     1,560   1,560 
Intangible assets, net     $206,527  $71,233 

The Company recorded amortization expense of $7,208 and $3,339 for the year ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The following table outlines estimated future annual amortization expense for the next five years and thereafter:

June 30,    
2018  $14,811 
2019   14,811 
2020   14,811 
2021   14,811 
2022   14,811 
Thereafter   130,912 
Total  $204,967 
       


Note 7. Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the following at June 30, 20172019 and June 30, 2016:2018 (in thousands): 

 

 June 30, 2017  June 30, 2016  June 30,
2019
 June 30, 
2018
 
Accounts payable $494,515  $73,400  $245 $139 
Accrued salaries and benefits  274,050   21,376  735 505 
Accrued bonuses     126,575  817 750 
Accrued stock-based compensation  399,157   179,079 
Accrued professional fees 315 293 
Accrued utilities 193 103 
Accrued interest 135 127 
Accrued good received not invoiced 69 160 
Other accrued expenses  168,646   143,216   702  516 
Totals $1,336,368  $543,646  $3,211 $2,593 

 

Note 8.7. Derivative Liabilities

  

Upon closing of private placements on May 22, 2015 and June 9, 2015, the Company issued 298,551 and 26,099 warrants, respectively, to purchase the same number of shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $1.50 and a five-year term to the placement agent. Upon closing of a private placement in April 2016, the Company issued 153,713 warrants to purchase the same number of shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $1.60 and a five-year term to the placement agent. The Company identified certain put features embedded in the warrants that potentially could result in a net cash settlement, requiring the Company to classify the warrants as a derivative liability.

During the year ended June 30, 2017, the Company amended the existing warrant agreements to eliminate the derivative feature. Upon execution of the revised agreements, a total of 471,697 warrants with a fair value of $2,200,219 were reclassified from liability to equity.

Level 3 Financial Liabilities – Derivative warrant liabilities

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below and disclosed on the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2017:

CarryingFair Value Measurement Using
ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Derivative warrant liabilities$$$$$

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below and disclosed on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2016:

  Carrying  Fair Value Measurement Using 
  Value  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
                     
Derivative warrant liabilities $1,322,729  $  $  $1,322,729  $1,322,729 

The table below provides a summary of the changes in fair value, including net transfers in and/or out, of all financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the yearyears ended June 30, 20172019 and 2016:2018 (in thousands):

 

  Fair Value
Measurement
Using Level 3
Inputs
 
  Total 
Balance, July 1, 2015 $205,144 
Issuance of derivative warrants  165,719 
Change in fair value of derivative warrant liabilities  968,840 
Reclassification of Derivative liability to Additional Paid in Capital  (16,974)
Balance, June 30, 2016 $1,322,729 
Change in fair value of derivative warrant liabilities  877,490 
Reclassification of Derivative liability to Additional Paid in Capital  (2,200,219)
Balance, June 30, 2017 $ 
  Fair Value
Measurement
Using Level 3
Inputs
 
  Total 
Balance, June 30, 2017 $ 
Issuance of derivative feature of make whole provision in convertible note  703 
Issuance of derivative feature of change in control provision in convertible note  456 
Change in fair value of derivative warrant liabilities  (54)
Balance, June 30, 2018 $1,105 
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  (150)
Balance, June 30, 2019  955 

 

The fair value of the derivative featurefeatures of the warrantsconvertible note on the issuance dates, and at the balance sheet date and on the date of reclassification to equity were calculated using the with-and-without method, a binomial option modelform of the income approach, valued with the following weighted average assumptions: 

 

 

April 14,

2016

  

June 30,

2016

  January 19,
2017
  June 30,
2019
  June 30,
2018
 
Remaining term (years)  3.92   4.92 
Expected volatility  49%  42%
Risk free interest rate  1.04%  1.08%  1.01%  1.73%  2.73%
Dividend yield  0.00%  0.00%  0.00%  0.00%  0.00%
Expected volatility  41%  44%  39%
Remaining term (years)  4.15 - 4.19   5.0   3.89 - 4.79 

 

Risk-free interest rate: The Company uses the risk-free interest rate of a U.S. Treasury NoteBill with a similar term on the date of the grant.issuance.

 

Dividend yield: The Company uses a 0% expected dividend yield as the Company has not paid dividends to date and does not anticipate declaring dividends in the near future.

 

Volatility: The Company calculatesestimated the expected volatility of the stock price based on the corresponding volatility of the Company’s peer group stock price for a period consistent with the warrant’sconvertible note’s expected term.

    

Remaining term: The Company’s remaining term is based on the remaining contractual maturityterm of the warrants.convertible note.


Note 8. Convertible Notes

The following table summarizes convertible debt as of June 30, 2019 (in thousands):  

  Maturity Date State Interest Rate  Conversion
Price
  Face Value  Remaining
Debt
(Discount)
  Fair Value of
Embedded
Conversion Option
  Carrying Value 
Long Term convertible notes payable                    
6.5% convertible senior secured notes 5/31/2023  6.50% $5.00  $15,000  $(6,825) $955  $9,130 
6.5% convertible senior notes 11/30/2023  6.50% $5.10  $10,000  $(915) $  $9,085 
                           
Ending Balance as of June 30, 2019           $25,000  $(7,740) $955  $18,215 

The following table summarizes convertible debt as of June 30, 2018 (in thousands):  

  Maturity Date State Interest Rate  Conversion
Price
  Face Value  Remaining
Debt
(Discount)
  Fair Value of
Embedded
Conversion Option
  Carrying Value 
Long Term convertible notes payable                    
6.5% convertible senior secured notes 5/31/2023  6.50% $6.55  $15,000  $(4,640) $1,105  $11,465 
                           
Ending Balance as of June 30, 2018           $15,000  $(4,640) $1,105  $11,465 

May 2018 Notes

On May 14, 2018, the Company completed the offering of $15.0 million principal amount of the Company’s 6.5% Convertible Senior Secured Notes due 2023. The net proceeds of the offering after payment of offering costs were approximately $13.1 million. The notes will mature on May 31, 2023, unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased. Interest on the notes accrues at the rate of 6.5% per year and is payable quarterly at the Company’s option in cash and/or freely tradable shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to certain limitations. The notes may be converted into common stock at the option of the holder at any time prior to maturity at an initial conversion price of $6.55 per share, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. If the holder elects to convert the notes at any time on or after the date that is one year after the last date of original issuance of the notes and prior to May 31, 2021, the holder will also receive a make-whole payment equal to the remaining scheduled interest payments that would have been made on the notes converted had such notes remained outstanding through May 31, 2021 (the “put date”). At the Company’s option, make-whole payments may be paid in cash and/or freely tradable shares of the Company’s common stock.

As a result of the Company issuing new shares of common stock for a price to the public of $4.25 per share in October 2018, the Company adjusted the conversion price of the convertible notes from $6.55 per share to $5.00 per share pursuant to the terms of the Indenture.

In addition, the Company identified a beneficial conversion feature in relation to the conversion option of the notes. The fair value of the conversion option of $1,809 thousand was recorded as a debt discount with a corresponding credit to additional paid in capital. As a result of the decrease of the conversion price of the convertible notes due to the October 2018 common stock offering, the associated beneficial conversion feature was increased by $3,951 thousand and recorded as a debt discount with a corresponding credit to additional paid in capital.

The Company recorded total debt discount and debt issuance costs of $4,845 thousand, to be amortized over three years using an effective interest method. Debt discount and debt issuance costs include the fair value of the embedded features at the issuance date of $1,159 thousand, the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature of $1,809 thousand, and debt issuance costs paid totaling $1,877 thousand.


October 2018 Notes

On October 23, 2018 the Company completed the offering of $10.0 million principal amount of the Company’s 6.5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023. The notes are unsecured and rank pari passu with the Company’s outstanding unsubordinated liabilities, including its 6.5% Convertible Senior Secured Notes due 2023 issued in May 2018. The net proceeds of the offering after payment of offering costs were approximately $8.9 million. The notes will mature on November 30, 2023, unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased. Interest on the notes accrues at the rate of 6.5% per year and is payable in cash on each February 28, May 31, August 31 and November 30, beginning February 28, 2019. The notes are convertible into common stock at the option of the holder at any time prior to maturity at an initial conversion price of $5.10 per share, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. 

The Company may redeem the notes, at its option and in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest on such principal up to the redemption date, as follows: (1) on or after November 30, 2019 until November 29, 2020, if the closing sale price per share of the Common Stock exceeds 175% of the then-effective conversion price of the notes for each of 20 of any 30 consecutive trading days immediately preceding the optional redemption notice delivered by the Company; (2) on or after November 30, 2020 until November 29, 2021, if the closing sale price per share of the Common Stock exceeds 150% of the then-effective conversion price of the notes for each of 20 of any 30 consecutive trading days immediately preceding the optional redemption notice delivered by the Company and (3) on or after November 30, 2021, if the closing sale price per share of the Common Stock exceeds 125% of the then-effective conversion price of the notes for each of 20 of any 30 consecutive trading days immediately preceding the optional redemption notice delivered by the Company. Upon redemption, each noteholder will receive an interest make-whole payment equal to the remaining scheduled interest payments that would have been made on the redeemed notes had the notes remained outstanding through the Maturity Date, which will be paid in cash; provided, however, that so long as the Make-Whole VWAP Price (as defined below) is not less than $5.01 per share (as appropriately adjusted for any stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend or other reclassification or combination of our common stock occurring after the date of issuance of the notes offered hereby), the Company will have the option to pay interest make-whole payments in freely tradable shares of Common Stock valued at the product of (x) 95% and (y) the volume weighted average price of Common Stock for the ten trading days ending on and including the trading day immediately preceding the redemption date (such product, the “Make-Whole VWAP Price”). 

Each holder of notes will have a one-time right to require the Company to repurchase on November 30, 2021 for cash all (but not less than all) of the notes of such holder at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest on such principal, if any, up to such repurchase date. In addition, if a “fundamental change” (as defined in the indenture) occurs prior to the maturity date, subject to certain conditions, holders of the notes will have the right to require the Company to repurchase for cash all of the notes, or any portion thereof that is equal to $1,000 or an integral multiple of $1,000, at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest on such principal, if any, up to such repurchase date.

The Company analyzed the components of the convertible notes for embedded derivatives and the application of the corresponding accounting treatment. This analysis determined that certain features of the notes represented derivatives that require bifurcation from the host contract. The fair value of these components of $0 was recorded as a debt discount and will be adjusted to fair value at the end of each future reporting period.


Note 9. Concentrations

Customers

Revenue from significant customers, those representing 10% or more of revenue for the respective periods, are summarized as follows:

  2019  2018 
Customer 1  31%  37%
Customer 2     24%
Customer 3     14%
Customer 4  12%   

Note 10. Stockholders’ Equity

Equity Issuances

December 2017 Offering

 

During the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company marked the derivative feature of the warrants to fair value and recorded a loss of $877,490 and $968,840, respectively, relating to the change in fair value.


Note 9.  Concentrations

For the year ended June 30, 2017, one vendor represented 11% of the Company’s purchases. For the year ended June 30, 2016, two vendors represented 28% and 14% of the Company’s purchases.

Note 10. Stockholders’ Equity

On December 15, 2016, in connection with the Company’s reincorporation from the State of Nevada to the State of Delaware,2018, the Company filedsold a Certificatetotal of Incorporation with the State of Delaware, which, among other things, reduced the number of authorized2,640,819 shares of capitalits common stock of the Company from 310,000,000 total shares consisting of (a) 300,000,000 shares of Common Stock and (b) 10,000,000 of $0.001 par value “blank check” preferred stock to 50,000,000 total shares consisting of (a) 45,000,000 shares of Common Stock and (b) 5,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock.

As of June 30, 2017 and 2016, there were no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding. 

The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense for the shares issued to consultants that have vested, which is a component of operating expensesat $5.50 per share in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as follows:

     Stock-Based Compensation 
          
     For the Year Ended 
Month of Original Grant Shares
Issued
  June 30,
2017
  June 30,
2016
 
December 2015  230,000  $945,189  $342,811 
March 2016  60,000   261,214   71,786 
August 2016  40,000   147,600    
January 2017  50,000   194,776    
   380,000  $1,548,779  $414,597 

On March 10, 2016, the Company held a closing of a private placement offering (the “March 2016 Offering”) in which it sold 494,125 shares of Common Stock at a fixed purchase price of $1.60 per share (the “2016 Offering Price”), for aggregate gross proceeds of $790,600 (before deducting legal expenses of the March 2016 Offering).

On April 14, 2016, the Company held closings of a private placement offering (the “April 2016 Offering”) in which the Company sold 1,741,185 shares of Common Stock at a fixed purchase price of $1.60 per share (the “2016 Offering Price”), for aggregate gross proceeds of $2,785,896 (before deducting expenses for legal services and agent commissions of the April 2016 Offering).

The Company sold a total of 2,142,000 shares of its Common Stock at the 2016-2017 Offering Price, with closings in each of November and December 2016 and January and February 2017, as well as 663,000 shares of Common Stock at the 2017 Offering Price, for aggregate gross proceeds were $16.7$14.5 million before deducting commissions and expenses of approximately $1.3 million. In addition to the commissions and expenses paid, the Company issued to the placement agents warrants to purchase 154,177 shares of the Company’s common stock. The warrants represent a cost of the offering, have a grant date fair value of $646 thousand and are shown as an offset on the consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity.  

 

The fair values of the warrants were estimated at the dates of grant using a binomial option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

Expected term (years)5.50
Risk-free interest rate2.12%
Volatility69%
Dividend yield0%

Investors in the December 2017 Offering (other than directors, officers, employees, or other affiliates of the Company) were given price-protected anti-dilution rights such that if, prior to September 30, 2018, the Company issued additional shares of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents (subject to customary exceptions, including but not limited to issuances of awards under equity compensation plans and certain other issuances of securities in connection with credit arrangements, equipment financings, lease arrangements or similar transactions) for a consideration per share less than the December 2017 Offering price per share (as adjusted for any subsequent stock dividend, stock split, distribution, recapitalization, reclassification, reorganization or similar event) (the “Lower Price”), each such investor would be entitled to receive from the Company additional shares of Common Stock in an amount such that, when added to the number of shares of Common Stock initially purchased by such investor, will equal the number of shares of Common Stock that such investor’s subscription amount would have purchased at the greater of the Lower Price and $5.00 (or $4.40 in the case of one investor).  

During the year ended June 30, 2018, the Company also issued 542,450 shares of its common stock to investors in the Company’s private placement offering that closed in May 2017. These issuances were made pursuant to the price-protection provisions granted to such investors in their subscription agreements.

October 2018 Offering

During the quarter ended December 31, 2018, the Company sold a total of 7,250,000 shares of its common stock at a price to the public of $4.25 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of $30.8 million before deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses payable by the Company of approximately $2.1 million. The Company expects to use the proceeds of the offering to fund the Company’s operations and growth of its business, including for capital expenditures, working capital, research and development, the commercialization of its technology and other general corporate purposes.


During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company also issued 113,592 shares of its common stock to investors in the Company’s private placement that closed in May 2017. These issuances were made pursuant to the price-protection provisions granted to such investors in their subscription agreements.  

StockEquity incentive plans

2015 Equity Incentive Plan

 

On May 22, 2015, the Board of Directors adopted, and on the same date the stockholders approved, the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”), which reserved a total of 1,200,000 shares of Common Stockcommon stock for issuance under the 2015 Plan. The 2015 Plan authorized the grant to participants of nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance grants. Effective December 15, 2016, equity awards were granted under the Company’s 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”), which was approved stockholders on the same date. Effective November 1, 2018, equity awards are granted under the Company’s 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”), which was approved stockholders on the same date. No additional shares will be issued under the 2015 Plan or the 2016 Plan. Effective December 15, 2016, equityThe Company settles awards are grantedissued under the Company’s 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, which was approved stockholders on the same date.all plans with newly issued common shares.

 

In addition, the number of shares of our Common Stockcommon stock subject to the 2015 Plan, 2016 Plan and 2018 Plan, any number of shares subject to any numerical limit in the 2016 Plan,Plans, and the number of shares and terms of any incentive award are expected toawards thereunder would be adjusted in the event of any change in our outstanding Common Stockcommon stock by reason of any stock dividend, spin-off, split-up, stock split, reverse stock split, recapitalization, reclassification, merger, consolidation, liquidation, business combination or exchange of shares or similar transaction.

 

Options granted under the 2015 Plan, 2016 Plan and 2018 Plan vest as determined by the Company’s board of directors and expire over varying terms, but not more than seventen years from the date of grant. In the case of an Incentive Stock Option that is granted to a 10% shareholder on the date of grant, such Option shall not be exercisable after the expiration of five years from the date of grant. Options for 160,000 shares of Common Stock were issued under the 2015 Plan to four non-employee directors in May 2015. No options have been awarded under the 2016 Plan.

 

The fair values of the Company’s options were estimated at the dates of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

 

Expected term (years)6.25
Risk-free interest rate1.29%
Volatility47%
Dividend yield0%

  June 30,
2019
 June 30,
2018
Exercise price $3.78 – $8.18 $6.24 – $7.59 
Expected term (years) 4.00 – 7.00 4.00 – 7.00 
Risk-free interest rate 1.89 – 2.97% 1.76-2.81% 
Volatility 66 – 69% 67-70% 
Dividend yield 0% 0% 
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value of Options granted during the period $2.88 $3.82 

Expected term: The Company’s expected term is based on the period the options are expected to remain outstanding. The Company estimated this amount utilizing the “Simplified Method” in that the Company does not have sufficient historical experience to provide a reasonable basis to estimate an expected term.

 

Risk-free interest rate: The Company uses the risk-free interest rate of a U.S. Treasury Note with a similar term on the date of the grant.

 

Volatility: The Company calculates the expected volatility of the stock price based onusing the corresponding volatilityhistorical volatilities of the Company’s peer groupcommon stock price for a period consistent withtraded on the options’ expected term.Nasdaq Capital Market.

 

Dividend yield: The Company uses a 0% expected dividend yield as the Company has not paid dividends to date and does not anticipate declaring dividends in the near future.

 

The following is a summary of the option activity:

 

 Options Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Options  Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
  Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (in years)
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 (in thousands)
 
Outstanding – July 1, 2015  160,000 $1.50 
Exercisable – July 1, 2015   $ 
Outstanding – June 30, 2018  1,338,859   6.06         
Granted     992,455   5.04         
Exercised     (29,250)  6.83         
Forfeited/Cancelled       (174,747)  6.12         
Outstanding – June 30, 2016  160,000  1.50 
Exercisable – June 30, 2016  40,000  1.50 
Granted   
Exercised   
Forfeited/Cancelled     
Outstanding – June 30, 2017  160,000 $1.50 
Exercisable – June 30, 2017  80,000 $1.50 
Outstanding – June 30, 2019  2,127,317   5.57   5.90   2,204 
Exercisable – June 30, 2019  610,359   5.17   5.53   832 

 


As of June 30, 2017, theThe total intrinsic value of options outstandingexercised during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019 and exercisableJune 30, 2018 was $1,158,400$20 thousand and $579,200,$0, respectively.

As of June 30, 2017,2019, the Company has $52,800$2.8 million inunrecognized stock-based compensation expense attributable to the outstanding options, which will be amortized over a period of 2.14two years.

 

For the years ended June 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the Company recorded $27,932$7.2 million and $28,008,$5.5 million, respectively, in stock-based compensation related to stock options, which is reflected in total operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.operations as follows (in thousands):

 

  2019  2018 
Research and Development $4,182  $2,424 
General and Administrative $3,058  $3,067 
Total $7,240  $5,491 

F-24

Issuance of restricted shares – employeesRestricted Stock Units and consultantsRestricted Stock Awards

 

RestrictedA summary of unvested restricted stock awards are considered outstanding at the time of execution by the Company(“RSAs”) and the recipient of a restricted stock agreement,unit awards (“RSUs”) outstanding as the stock award holders are entitled to dividend and voting rights. As of June 30, 2017,2019 and changes during the number of shares granted for which the restrictions have not lapsed was 1,352,265 shares.year ended is as follows:

 

  Number of 
RSAs/RSUs
  Weighted 
Average
Fair Value
per
Share/Unit
 
Outstanding - June 30, 2018  1,599,055  $5.73 
Granted  720,380   6.21 
Vested  (754,930)  5.54 
Forfeited/Cancelled/Repurchased  (222,123)  5.86 
Outstanding – June 30, 2019  1,342,382   6.01 

The Company recognizes the compensation expense for all share-based compensation granted based on theweighted average grant date fair value per share for directorsawards granted during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019 and employeesJune 30, 2018 was $6.21 and the reporting period remeasured fair value for consultants.$6.61, respectively. The total fair value of restricted awards that vested during the award is recorded as share–based compensation expense over the respective restriction period. Any portion of the grant awarded to consultants, directors, employees, and other service providers as to which the repurchase option has not lapsed is accrued on the Balance Sheet as a component of accounts payable and accrued expenses. As of June 30, 2017 and 2016, the accrued stock-based compensation was $399,157 and $179,079, respectively. The Company has the right to repurchase some or all of such shares in certain circumstances upon termination of the recipient’s service with the Company, for up to 60 months from the date of termination (“repurchase option”). The shares as to which the repurchase option has not lapsed are subject to forfeiture upon termination of consulting and employment relationships.

In September 2015, the Company amended the original restricted stock agreement for certain award recipients. Pursuant to the amendment, 75% of the shares as to which the repurchase option had not lapsed as of September 30, 2015 will be released from the repurchase option on the third anniversary of the original effective date of the agreement. The remaining 25% of the shares will be released from the repurchase option on the fourth anniversary of the original effective date.   

The following is a summary of restricted shares:

Grant Date Shares
Issued
  Fair
Value (1)
  Shares
Vested
 
June 2014  307,876  $1,294,029   121,530 
July 2014  32,408   48,612   23,791 
August 2014  81,020   326,323   8,102 
September 2014  129,633   352,282   13,667 
March 2015  72,918   401,717    
October 2015  293,000   439,500    
November 2015  36,200   54,300    
December 2015  300,000   1,393,000   230,000 
January 2016  40,000   68,000    
March 2016  60,000   333,000   60,000 
June 2016  118,000   535,809    
August 2016  351,000   1,489,247   40,000 
January 2017  192,000   1,165,122    
February 2017  110,000   697,500    
March 2017  20,000   135,000    
   2,144,055  $8,733,441   497,090 


(1)– The fair value of the restricted stock awards as shown above is based on either the balance sheet date for consultants or grant date for employees.

In relation to the above restricted stock agreements for the yearfiscal years ended June 30, 20172019 and 2016,June 30, 2018 was $4.9 million and $3.8 million, respectively.

During the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense forof $4.2 million and $3.8 million, respectively related to the sharesRSAs and RSUs that have vested of $3,223,398 and $821,617, respectively.been issued to date.

 

As of June 30, 2017,2019, the Company had $3,966,899approximately $4.2 million in unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to the unvested shares.

 

Performance Awards

In September 2018 the Company granted 119,500 performance-based restricted stock units (PBRSU) to employees with a grant date fair value per share of $8.30. The PBRSU awards contain performance and service conditions which must be satisfied for an employee to earn the award. The performance condition is based primarily on the achievement of certain performance objectives. Once earned, the PBRSU awards vest 100% on the first anniversary of the grant date. The Company recognizes compensation expense for PBRSU awards using a graded vesting model, based on the probability of the performance condition being met. During the year, 119,500 of the PBRSU awards were earned.

A summary of unvested PBRSU’s outstanding as of June 30, 2019 and changes during the year ended is as follows:

  Number of 
PBRSUs
  Weighted 
Average
Fair Value
per

Share/Unit 
 
Outstanding - June 30, 2018  15,000  $6.26 
Granted  119,500   8.30 
Vested  (15,000)  6.26 
Forfeited/Cancelled/Repurchased      
Outstanding – June 30, 2019  119,500   8.30 

The weighted average grant date fair value per share for awards granted during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018 was $8.30 and $6.26, respectively. The total fair value of restricted awards that vested during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018 was $0.1 million and $0, respectively.

During the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $0.63 million and $0.03 million, respectively related to the PBRSU awards that have been issued to date.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had approximately $177 thousand in unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to the 120 thousand unvested PBRSU awards.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Effective November 1, 2018, the Company adopted the Akoustis Technologies, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan 2018 (the “ESPP”), which was approved by the stockholders on the same date, The ESPP is intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” under Section 423 of the Code. All regular full-time employees of the Company (including officers) and all other employees who meet the eligibility requirements of the plan may participate in the ESPP. The ESPP provides eligible employees an opportunity to acquire the Company’s common stock at 85.0% of the lower of the closing price per share of the Company’s common stock on the first or last day of each six-month purchase period. At June 30, 2019, 0.48 million shares were available for future issuance under this plan. The Company makes no cash contributions to the ESPP but bears the expenses of its administration. The Company issued 0.02 million, and 0.0 million shares under the ESPP in fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company settles awards issued under the ESPP with newly issued common shares. 


For the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded $0.04 million and $0.00 million, respectively, in stock-based compensation related to grants of ESPP shares.

Note 11. Commitments and contingencies

 

Employment agreements

On June 15, 2015, the Company entered into a three-year employment agreement with the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). After the initial three-year term, the agreement will be automatically renewed for successive one-year periods unless terminated by either party on at least 30 days’ written notice prior to the end of the then-current term. The CEO’s annual base salary is $150,000 and is subject to increase or decrease on each anniversary as determined by the Board of Directors. The CEO is eligible, at the discretion of our Board of Directors, to receive an annual cash bonus of up to 100% of his annual base salary, which may be based on the Company achieving certain operational, financial or other milestones (the “Milestones”) that may be established by the Board of Directors. The CEO is entitled to receive stock options or other equity incentive awards under the 2016 Plan as and when determined by the Board, and is entitled to receive perquisites and other fringe benefits that may be provided to, and is eligible to participate in any other bonus or incentive program established by the Company, for the executives. The CEO and his dependents are also entitled to participate in any of the employee benefit plans subject to the same terms and conditions applicable to other employees. The CEO will be entitled to be reimbursed for all reasonable travel, entertainment and other expenses incurred or paid by him in connection with, or related to, the performance of his duties, responsibilities or services under his employment agreement, in accordance with policies and procedures, and subject to limitations, adopted by us from time to time. In the event that the CEO is terminated by the Company without Cause (as defined in his employment agreement) or he resigns for Good Reason (as defined in his employment agreement) during the term of his employment agreement, the CEO would be entitled to (x) an amount equal to his annual base salary then in effect (payable in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices) for a period of 24 months commencing on the effective date of his termination (the “Severance Period”) (in the case of termination by the executive for Good Reason, reduced by any cash remuneration paid to him because of any other employment or self-employment during the Severance Period), and (y) if and to the extent the Milestones are achieved for the annual bonus for the year in which the Severance Period commences (or, in the absence of Milestones, the Board of Directors has, in its sole discretion, otherwise determined an amount of the CEO’s annual bonus for such year), an amount equal to such annual bonus pro-rated for the portion of the performance year completed before the CEO employment terminated, (z) any unvested stock options, restricted stock or similar incentive equity instruments will vest immediately. For the duration of the Severance Period, the CEO will also be eligible to participate in our benefit plans or programs, provided the CEO was participating in such plan or program immediately prior to the date of employment termination, to the extent permitted under the terms of such plan or program (collectively, the “Termination Benefits”). If the CEO’s employment is terminated during the term of his employment agreement by the Company for Cause, by the CEO for any reason other than Good Reason or due to his death, then he will not be entitled to receive the Termination Benefits, and shall only be entitled to the compensation and benefits which shall have accrued as of the date of such termination (other than with respect to certain benefits that may be available to the CEO as a result of a Permanent Disability (as defined in his employment agreement).

On June 15, 2015, the Company also entered into two-year employment agreements with each of the Vice President of Business Development, the Vice President of Operations, and the then Chief Financial Officer. Each of these employment agreements had substantially the same terms as that of the CEO described above. These employment agreements expired on June 15, 2017.

On July 14, 2017, the Board named a new Chief Financial Officer who would also serve as the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer, effective as of the same date.


In connection with the election of the new Chief Financial Officer of the Company, the Company entered into a one-year employment agreement, dated July 14, 2017 (the “Employment Agreement”), with the Chief Financial Officer with essentially the same terms as the Chief Executive Officer employment agreement described above with the exception of the following:

-Monthly living expenses of $1,600.

-Target annual bonus each fiscal year equal to 70% of his annual base salary, based on certain Company operation, financial, and other milestones set by the Board and/or its Compensation Committee.

-A restricted a stock award for 100,000 shares of Common Stock and options for 75,000 shares of Common Stock to be granted during the Company’s next open trading window. The Awards will be granted under the 2016 Plan and will vest 25% on each of the first, second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, subject to the CFO’s continued employment and the terms and conditions of the 2016 Plan and the applicable award agreements.

The term of the Employment Agreement extends through July 31, 2018, and the Employment Agreement will automatically renew for successive one- year periods unless either party gives at least 30 days written notice of non-renewal to the other party prior to the end of the then applicable term.

Operating leases

 

The Company leasesleased three office spacelocations in Huntersville, NC pursuant to afive- and three-year lease agreement.agreements, and month to month. The three-year lease agreement expired in April 2018 in connection with a move in corporate office location, and the five-year lease agreement expires in November 2022. The operating lease providesleases provide for annual real estate tax and cost of living increases and containscontain predetermined increases in the rentals payable during the termterms of the lease.leases. The aggregate rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The total lease rental expense was $56,808$0.1 million and $55,186$0.1 million for the years ended June 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.  The future minimum payments under this lease are $40,314.

 

The Company leases equipment for its Canandaigua,the NY facility pursuant to a three-month lease agreement beginning on June 16, 2017.Facility until September 2023. The aggregate rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The total lease rental expense was $8,125$0.1 million, and $0$0.1 million for the years ended June 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. Additionally, the Company leases a copier for the NC office location pursuant to a five-year lease agreement. The total lease rental expense was $6 thousand and $1 thousand for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

The following table outlines the minimum future minimumlease payments under thisfor the next five years and thereafter, (in thousands):

June 30,   
2020 $171 
2021  175 
2022  179 
2023  183 
2024  153 
Thereafter  71 
Total $932 

Ontario County Industrial Development Authority Agreement

On February 27, 2018, the Company entered into a Lease and Project Agreement (the “Lease and Project Agreement”) and a Company Lease Agreement (the “Company Lease Agreement” and together with the Lease and Project Agreement, the “Agreements”), each dated as of February 1, 2018, with the Ontario County Industrial Development Agency, a public benefit corporation of the State of New York (the “OCIDA”). Pursuant to the Agreements, the Company will lease are $44,375.for $1.00 annually to the OCIDA an approximately 9.995 acre parcel of land in Canandaigua, New York, together with the improvements thereon (including the Company’s New York fabrication facility), and transfer title to certain related equipment and personal property to the OCIDA (collectively, the “Facility”). The OCIDA will lease the Facility back to the Company for annual rent payments specified in the Lease and Project Agreement for the Company’s primary use as research and development, manufacturing, warehouse and professional office space in its business, and to be subleased, in part, by the Company to various existing tenants. The Company anticipates renewingestimates substantial tax savings during the leaseterm of the Agreements, which expire on December 31, 2028. In addition, subject to the terms of the Lease and Project Agreement, certain purchases and leases of eligible items will be exempt from the imposition of sales and use taxes. Subject to the terms of the Lease and Project Agreement, the OCIDA has also granted to the Company an exemption from certain mortgage recording taxes for another three monthsone or more mortgages securing an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $12.0 million, or such greater amount as approved by the OCIDA in its sole and in processabsolute discretion. The benefits provided to the Company pursuant to the terms of finalizing termsthe Lease and conditions.Project Agreement are subject to claw back over the life of the Agreements upon certain recapture events, including certain events of default.

 

Real Estate Contingent Liability

On March 23, 2017, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement and a Real Property Purchase Agreement (collectively, the “STC-MEMS Agreements”) with The Research Foundation for the State University of New York (“RF-SUNY”) and Fuller Road Management Corporation (“FRMC”), an affiliate of RF-SUNY (collectively, “Sellers”), respectively, to acquire certain specified assets, including STC-MEMS, a semiconductor wafer-manufacturing and microelectromechanical systems (“MEMS”) operation with associated wafer-manufacturing tools, and the associated real estate and improvements located in Canandaigua, New York used in the operation of STC-MEMS (the assets and real estate and improvements referred to together herein as the “STC-MEMS Business”).

 

In connection with the acquisition of the STC-MEMS Business, the Company agreed to pay to Fuller Road Management CorporationFRMC a penalty, as set forth below, if the Company sells the property subject to the related Definitive Real Property Purchase Agreement within three (3) years after the date of such agreement for an amount in excess of $1,750,000,$1,750 thousand, subject to certain enumerated exceptions. The penalty imposed shall be equivalent to the amount that the sales price of the property exceeds $1,750,000$1,750 thousand up to the maximum penalty (“Maximum Penalty”) defined below:below, (in thousands):

 

   Maximum Penalty 
Year 1  $5,960,000 
Year 2  $3,973,333 
Year 3  $1,986,667 

  Maximum
Penalty
 
Year 3, ending March 23, 2020 $445 

The fair value of the contingent liability was calculated by an independent third-party appraisal firm, utilizing a present value calculation based on the probability the Company sells the property triggering the contingent penalty and a discount rate of 14.1%15.6%. The 14.1%15.6% discount rate was derived from a weighted average cost of capital, modified to include the effects of the bargain purchase price. As of June 30, 2017,2019, and 2018, the balancefair value of the contingent liability was $1,730,542.$0.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively. During the year ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company marked the contingent liability to fair value and recorded a gain of $0.8 million and $0.5 million, respectively, relating to the change in fair value.

     


Litigation, Claims and Assessments

From time to time, the Company may become involved in lawsuits, investigations and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses against all pending claims and intends to vigorously pursue them. While it is not possible to predict or determine the outcomes of any pending actions, the Company believes the amount of liability, if any, with respect to such actions, would not materially affect its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company ended the employment of its principal financial officer, John T. Kurtzweil (the “Former CFO”). The Former CFO’s employment was terminated for cause pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement by unanimous vote of the Company’s Board of Directors and not due to any disagreement concerning the Company’s financial statements, accounting policies or accounting practices. The Former CFO disputes the termination for cause and has since filed for an arbitration hearing pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement and has filed a complaint under the whistleblower provisions of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration of the U.S. Department of Labor. The Company has not recorded a loss contingency associated with the Former CFO’s termination. In accordance with the Former CFO’s employment agreement, if it is determined that grounds for termination were for cause then the expense to the Company would be $0. A determination that grounds were without cause would result in the cash expenditure of approximately $206 thousand representing 1 years’ salary, COBRA and cost of living expense, and prorated bonus up to the date of termination. Additionally, the Company would record a non-cash expense of approximately $883 thousand representing the immediate full vesting of restricted stock units and stock options on the date of termination.

Tax Credit Contingency

The Company accrues a liability for indirect tax contingencies when it believes that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and that it can reasonably estimate the amount of the loss. The Company reviews these accruals and adjusts them to reflect ongoing negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and other relevant information. To the extent new information is obtained and the Company’s views on the probable outcomes of claims, suits, assessments, investigations or legal proceedings change, changes in the Company’s accrued liabilities would be recorded in the period in which such determination is made.

The Company’s gross unrecognized indirect tax credits totaled $0.1 million as of June 30, 2019 and $0.1 million as of June 30, 2018 and is recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as a long-term liability.

Note 12. Related Party Transactions

 

Consulting Services

 

AEG Consulting, a firm owned by one of the Company’s Co-Chairmen, received $15,195$0 and $10,238$10 thousand for consulting fees for the years ended June 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.

 

The Company’s CEOOn November 2, 2018, the Company granted the Co-Chairman 5,000 RSUs with a fair value on the grant date of $19 thousand and Vice President of Engineering participated in the closingstock options to purchase 10,000 shares of the 2016-2017 Offering that occurredCompany’s common stock with a fair value on November 25, 2016 where theythe grant date of $25 thousand for consulting services provided by AEG Consulting. Both awards vest in four equal installments on each purchased 20,000of the first four anniversaries of the grant date. The options carry an exercise price of $3.78 and have a term of 7 years.

On September 27, 2017, the Company granted the Co-Chairman 5,000 RSUs with a fair value on the grant date of $36 thousand and stock options to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stockthe Company’s common stock with a fair value on the grant date of $47 thousand for consulting services provided by AEG Consulting. Both awards vest in four equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date. The options carry an exercise price of $7.12 and have a term of 7 years.

Total stock-based compensation expense related to stock-based awards granted for the Co-Chairman’s consulting services was $51 thousand and $26 thousand for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Offering/Private Placement

On November 14, 2017, certain members of the Company’s Board of Directors purchased shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $5.00$5.50 per share. The Company’s Vice-President of Operations also purchased 2,000 shares of Common Stockshare in the closing at an aggregate purchase price of $10,000.a private placement. One of the Company’s Co-Chairmen of the Company’s Board purchased 200,000154,545 shares of Common Stock at a price of $5.00 per share at an aggregate purchase price of $1,000,000. The brother of the CEO purchased 14,000 shares of Common Stock in the closing at an aggregate purchase price of $70,000.

The Company’s second Co-Chairman participated in the closing of the 2016-2017 Offering that occurred on December 27, 2016 where he purchased 2,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $5.00$5.50 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $10,000. A second brother$850 thousand. The other Co-Chairman purchased 1,818 shares at a price of the CEO purchased 20,000 shares of Common Stock in the closing at$5.50 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000.$10 thousand. Three additional members of the Company’s Board of Directors each purchased 5,454 shares at a price of $5.50 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $30 thousand for each such Board member.

 

Inventory Purchase

In March 2016, the Company purchased inventory from Big Red LLC (“Big Red”),On December 1, 2017 a company formed by the CEO, the brother of the Company’s CEO, the Vice President of Operations and one additional party. The transaction for $43,544 was executed so the Company could pursue commercializationChief Executive Officer purchased 12,000 shares of the amplifier inventory purchased. The Company will utilize this inventory and related technology to process and sell the amplifiers. The CEO and Vice PresidentCompany’s common stock in a private placement at a price of Operations assigned their interests in Big Red to other parties in March$5.50 per share for an aggregate purchase price of 2016.$66 thousand.


Note 13. Income Taxes

 

License AgreementOn December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”) was signed into law. ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes, requires companies to recognize the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities and the retroactive effects of changes in tax laws in the period in which the new legislation is enacted. Due to the timing of the Company’s fiscal year. The lower corporate tax rate was phased in, resulting in a U.S. statutory federal rate of approximately 27.6% for our fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 and 21% for subsequent fiscal years.

The SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) to address the appropriate accounting treatment when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act. 

 

In April 2016,the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, the deferred tax assets and liabilities of the Company entered into a license agreement with Big Red.were impacted by the Tax Act. The license agreement was executed so thatreduction in the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, required the Company could pursue commercialization of amplifier inventory purchased from Big Red in March 2016. Theto remeasure its deferred tax assets and liabilities. In accordance with SAB 118, the Company will utilizeevaluated this inventorychange and related technologyrecorded a provisional decrease to process and sell the amplifiers. Future revenue from sales utilizing the amplifier technology will result innet deferred tax assets with a license fee paid to Big Red accordingcorresponding decrease to the following schedule:Company’s valuation allowance against deferred tax assets of $4.6 million. We finalized our accounting for the impact of the Tax Act during fiscal 2019 with no material adjustments to the previous provisional amounts recognized.

Income Tax Expense

 

Net SalesJune 30,
2019
 Royalty PercentageJune 30,
2018
 
$0 - $500,000Current:  5.00%
$500,000 - $1,000,000  4.00%
Federal$1,000,000 - $2,000,000  3.50$%
$2,000,000 – $5,000,000State and Local  3.00%
$5,000,001 and over  2.00%
Total Current Tax Provision
Deferred:
Federal
State and Local
Total Deferred Tax Provision
Total Tax Provision$$

   

Note 13. Income Taxes

The Company had no income tax expense due to operating losses incurred for the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.


The provision for/(benefit from) income tax differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before the provision for/(benefit from) income taxes. The sources and tax effects of the differences are as follows: 

 

  

For the
Year Ended

June 30,
2017

  For the
Year Ended
June 30,
2016
 
Income taxes at Federal statutory rate  (34.00)%  (34.00)%
State income taxes, net of Federal income tax benefit  (2.63)%  (2.60)%
Permanent differences  (6.36)%  0.22%
Other  6.49%   
Change in Valuation Allowance  36.50%  36.09%
State tax rate change  0.00%  0.29%
Income Tax Provision  0.00%  0.00%

  

For the
Year Ended

June 30,
2019

  

For the
Year Ended

June 30,
2018

 
Income taxes at Federal statutory rate  (21.00)%  (27.55)%
State income taxes, net of Federal income tax benefit  (0.45)%  (1.96)%
Tax Credits  (1.45)%  (0.21)%
Permanent differences  (0.23)%  0.04%
Convertible Debt Discount  2.89%  1.90%
Other  (0.02)%  0.00%
Change in Valuation Allowance  18.92%  12.19%
Effect of changes in income tax rate applied to net deferred taxes  1.34%  15.59%
Income Tax Provision  0.00%  0.00%

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:follows, (in thousands):

 

 June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016  June 30,
2019
  June 30,
2018
 
Deferred Tax Assets     
Net Operating Loss Carryforwards $5,352,238  $1,711,488  $13,196  $7,849 
Share-based compensation 406,498 396,264 
Derivative liability  315,205 
Stock-based compensation  1,786   1,283 
Credits  470   46 
Other  (33,028)  (22,365  346   514 
  15,798   9,692 
Deferred Tax Liabilities        
Convertible debt discount  (964)  (397)
Accumulated depreciation/basis differences  (925)  (919)
  (1,889)  (1,316)
 5,725,708 2,400,592         
Valuation Allowance  (5,725,708)  (2,400,592)  (13,909)  (8,376)
Net Deferred Tax Assets $ $  $  $ 

  

At June 30, 2017,2019, the Company had federal loss carryovers of approximately $14,600,000 of Federal and state NOL carryovers$34.2 million that may be available to offset future taxable income.

The NOL carry overs, if not utilized, will expire in stages beginning 2035.in 2034 if unused and federal loss carryovers of $26.5 million that will carry forward indefinitely. The North Carolina and New York state loss carryovers of approximately $22.3 million and $12.5 million, respectively, will begin to expire in 2029 if unused. Federal research credits of $0.5 million will expire beginning in 2034 if not utilized.

The company has not performed a detailed analysis to determine whether an ownership change under IRC Section 382 has occurred during the year ended June 30, 2019 or during any earlier year. If upon a complete analysis the company were to determine that an ownership change under Section 382 had occurred the effect of the ownership change would be the imposition of annual limitations on the use of NOL carryforwards. Any limitation may result in the expiration of a portion or all of the NOLs before utilization.

 

Based on a history of cumulative losses at the Company and the results of operations for the years ended June 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the Company determined that it is more likely than not it will not realize benefits from the deferred tax assets. The Company will not record income tax benefits in the financial statements until it is determined that it is more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred income tax assets. As a result of the analysis, the Company determined that a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets is required. The net change in the valuation allowance during the year ended June 30, 20172019 was an increase of approximately $3,325,000.$5.5 million.

 

As a result of the reverse merger that occurred on May 22, 2015, theThe Company’s previous NOL may be significantly limited. The Company has not performed a detailed analysis to determine whether an ownership change under IRC Section 382 or similar rules has occurred. The effect of an ownership change would be the imposition of annual limitation on the use of NOL carryforwards attributable to periods before the change which total approximately $421,000. Any limitation may result in expiration of a portion of the NOL before utilization. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertaingross unrecognized tax positions in selling, general and administrative expenses. The Company has not identified any uncertain tax positions requiring a reservebenefits totaled $0.1 million as of June 30, 2017.2019 and $0.3 million as of June 30, 2018. Of these amounts, $0.1 million and $0.3 million as of June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018, respectively, represent the amounts of unrecognized tax benefit that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate in each of the fiscal years.

 

A reconciliation of June 30, 2018 through June 30, 2019 beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):

  June 30,
2019
  June 30,
2018
 
Beginning Balance $296  $ 
Additions based on positions related to the current year  50   250 
Additions for tax positions in prior years     46 
Reductions for tax positions in prior years  (198)   
Expiration of statute of limitations      
Ending Balance $148  $296 

The unrecognized tax benefit of $148 thousand at the end of June 30, 2019 is recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as a reduction to the carrying value of the gross deferred tax assets.


The Company’s fiscal 2015, 2016 and 2017 federal and state returns remain open for examination. The Company is not currently under examination by any taxing authorities. 

Note 14. Segment Information

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision–making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is its Chief Executive Officer. The Company operates in two segments, Foundry Fabrication Services which consists of engineering review services and STC-MEMS foundry services; and RF Filters which consists of amplifier and filter product sales, and grant revenue. The Company records all general and administrative costs in the RF Filters segment.

The Company evaluates performance of its operating segments based on revenue and operating profit (loss). Segment information for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 are as follows (in thousands): 

  Foundry
Fabrication
Services
 RF Filters Total
       
Year ended June 30, 2019      
Revenue $1,058  $276  $1,334 
Grant revenue  -     109   109 
Cost of revenue  811   202   1,013 
Gross margin  247   183   430 
Research and development  -     19,246   19,246 
General and administrative  -     8,701   8,701 
Other operating expenses  50   -     50 
Income/(Loss) from Operations $197  $(27,764) $(27,567)
             
Year ended June 30, 2018            
Revenue $1,007  $54  $1,061 
Grant Revenue  -     147   147 
Cost of revenue  1,016   4   1,020 
Gross margin  (9)  197   188 
Research and development  -     13,267   13,267 
General and administrative  -     8,804   8,804 
Other operating expenses  -     395   395 
Loss from Operations $(9) $(22,269) $(22,278)
             
As of June 30, 2019            
Accounts receivable $150  $135  $285 
Property and equipment, net  54   15,124   15,178 
             
As of June 30, 2018            
Accounts receivable $192  $23  $215 
Property and equipment, net  465   12,355   12,820 

Note 15. Subsequent Events

None 


ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that is designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Interim Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2019. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of such date due to the material weaknesses described below with respect to our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2019. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013).

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Our management, including our chief executive officer and interim chief financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2019.  Based on this assessment, we identified the following material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting:

1.The Company did not design and implement effective Information Technology General Controls (“ITGC”) for certain information systems that are relevant to the preparation of the Company’s financial statements. Specifically, applications supporting the processes of payroll, cash management, fixed assets and financial close included deficiencies related to user access controls, change management, information technology operations and third party service providers.  These ITGC deficiencies, combined with inadequate compensating review controls, create a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to the consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. 

2. Management review controls designed to address risks associated with complex accounting matters that arise from significant routine and non-routine transactions – related to revenue, share-based compensation, research and development expense, and debt – to ensure that those transactions are properly accounted for in accordance with U.S. GAAP did not operate effectively.

Notwithstanding the material weaknesses discussed above, our management has concluded that the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2019 has been audited by Marcum LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.

Remediation Plan

As fiscal year 2019 was the first year that the Company was subject to an audit over of internal controls over financial reporting (Sarbanes Oxley section 404(b)), fiscal year 2020 will present the first opportunity to remediate the material weaknesses described above.

Remediation activities will include:

IT General Controls: During fiscal year 2020, key mitigating controls will be designed and implemented in the absence of full year coverage of SSAE-18 (SOC1) reports. Controls will include complementary entity user controls or other supporting documentation for applications used to support the financial statements.

Non-Routine Transaction Review: During fiscal year 2020, controls will be put in place in order to comprehensively review all non-routine, material transactions in order to ensure that they are accounted for properly. Specifically, requirements such as thresholds, level of documentation and compensating controls will be considered in the design process. This control will include members of the executive team and, if needed, the Company will employ the use of external subject matter experts.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION

None.


PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

In July 2017, 9,533 placement agent warrants issued in connection with the 2016-2017 private placement offering, each having a termThe information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A relating to our 2019 annual meeting of five years and an exercise price of $5.00, were exercised.stockholders.

 

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A relating to our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholders Matters

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A relating to our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A relating to our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A relating to our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders.


PART IV

EXHIBIT INDEXITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following Consolidated Financial Statements as set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this report are filed herein.

Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Consolidated Balance SheetsF-4
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive IncomeF-5
Consolidated Statements of EquityF-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsF-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Financial Statement Schedules

All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.


Exhibits

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number

 

Description

   
2.1 Plan of Conversion, dated December 15, 2016(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 16, 2016)
   
2.2 Definitive Asset Purchase Agreement dated March 23, 2017 by and between The Research Foundation for the State University of New York and the Company(incorporated  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 24, 2017)
   
2.3 Definitive Real Property Purchase Agreement dated March 23, 2017, by and between Fuller Road Management Corporation and the Company(incorporated  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 24, 2017)
   
3.1 Articles of Conversion of the Company, as filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on December 15, 2016(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 16, 2016)
   
3.2 Certificate of Conversion of the Company, as filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 15, 2016(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 15,16, 2016)
   
3.3 Certificate of Incorporation, as filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 15, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 15,16, 2016)
   
3.4 Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 15,16, 2016)
   
10.1.1†4.1 Indenture, dated as of May 14, 2018, by and among Akoustis Technologies Inc., Akoustis, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 15, 2018)
4.2Indenture, dated as of October 23, 2018, by and between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 23, 2018)
4.3FirstSupplemental Indenture, dated as of October 23, 2018, by and between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 23, 2018)
4.4

Form of 6.5% Convertible Senior Note due November 30, 2023(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 23, 2018)

4.5Form of Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 18, 2018, among the Company, Akoustis, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 23, 2018)
10.1.1†Akoustis, Inc. 2014 Stock Plan(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Transition Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on October 31, 2016)
   
10.1.2† Form of Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement under the 2014 Stock Plan between the Company (as assignee of Akoustis, Inc.) and each of Steve DenBaars, Mark Boomgarden and Arthur Geiss(incorporated  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2015)
   
10.1.3† Form of Amendment to Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement under the 2014 Stock Plan between the Company and each of Steve DenBaars and Mark Boomgarden(incorporated  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on June 29, 2016)
   
10.210.1.4† Declaration of Amendment to the Akoustis, Inc. 2014 Stock Plan(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 14, 2017)
10.2Joint Development Agreement, dated February 27, 2015, between Akoustis, Inc. and Global Communication Semiconductors, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2015)

10.3 
10.3Foundry Agreement, dated February 27, 2015, between Akoustis, Inc. and Global Communication Semiconductors, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2015)
   
10.4 Form of 2015 Placement Agent Warrant for Common Stock of the Company in connection with the Company’s 2015 private placement offering(incorporated  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2015)


   
10.5 Form of 2015 Registration Rights Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2015)
   
10.6.1† Akoustis Technologies, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2015)
   
10.6.2† Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Akoustis Technologies, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2015)
   
10.6.3† Form of Restricted Stock Agreement, under the Akoustis Technologies, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, between the Company and each of Mark Boomgarden, Dave Aichele and Cindy Payne(incorporated  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on June 29, 2016)
   
10.7† Employment Agreement between the Company and Jeffrey Shealy dated as of June 15, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 19, 2015)
   
10.8.1† Employment Agreement between the Company and David M. Aichele dated as of June 15, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 19, 2015)
   
10.8.2† Offer Letter from the Company to David M. Aichele(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 30, 2017)
   
10.9.1†10.9 Employment Agreement between the Company and Mark Boomgarden dated as of June 15, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 19, 2015)
10.9.2†Offer Letter from the Company to Mark D. Boomgarden(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 30, 2017)
10.10.1†Employment Agreement between the Company and Cindy C. Payne dated as of June 15, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 19, 2015)
10.10.2†Offer Letter from the Company to Cindy C. Payne(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 26, 2017)
10.11

Form of 2016 Subscription Agreement between the Company and the investors party thereto(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 20, 2016)

   
10.1210.10 

Form of 2016 Placement Agent Warrant for Common Stock of the Company in connection with the Company’s 2016 private placement offering(incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 20, 2016)

   
10.1310.11 Form of 2016 Registration Rights Agreement(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 11, 2016)
   
10.14.110.12.1 Form of Registration Rights Agreement by and among the Company and the investors in the 2016-2017 Offering(incorporated  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 25, 2016)


10.14.2 
10.14.2Amendment No. 1 to Registration Rights Agreement by and among the Company and the investors in the 2016-2017 Offering(incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 28, 2016)
   
10.15 Form of Placement Agent Warrant in the 2016-2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 28, 2016)
   
10.16.110.21 Form of Subscription Agreement by and among the Company and the investors in the 2016-2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017)
10.16.2Form of Amended Subscription Agreement by and among the Company and the investors in the 2016-2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017)
10.17.1Placement Agent Agreement, dated December 8, 2016, by and between the Company and Katalyst Securities LLC in connection with the 2016-2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017)
10.17.2Amendment to Placement Agent Agreement, dated May 8, 2017, by and between the Company and Katalyst Securities LLC(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-218245) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2017)
10.18.1Placement Agent Agreement, dated December 12, 2016, by and between the Company and Drexel Hamilton, LLC in connection with the 2016-2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017)
10.18.2Amendment to Placement Agent Agreement by and between the Company and Drexel Hamilton LLC(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-218245) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2017)
10.19Placement Agent Agreement, dated December 14, 2016, by and between the Company and Joseph Gunnar & Co., LLC in connection with the 2016-2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017)
10.20Placement Agent Agreement, dated December 19, 2016, by and between the Company and Northland Securities, Inc. in connection with the 2016-2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017)
10.21Form of Amended and Restated Placement Agent Warrant for Common Stock of the Company in connection with the Company’s 2015 private placement offering and 2016 private placement offering(incorporated  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017)
   
10.22.1† Akoustis Technologies, Inc. 2016 Stock Incentive Plan(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 16, 2016)
   
10.22.2† Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Akoustis Technologies, Inc. 2016 Stock Incentive Plan(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017)
   
10.22.3† Revised Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Akoustis Technologies, Inc. 2016 Stock Incentive Plan(incorporated  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 23, 2017)


10.23.1 
10.23.1Form of Subscription Agreement by and among the Company and the investors in the 2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-218245) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2017)
   
10.23.2 Form of Amended Subscription Agreement by and among the Company and the investors in the 2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-218245) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2017)
   
10.24 Form of Registration Rights Agreement by and among the Company and the investors in the 2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-218245) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2017)
   
10.25 Form of Placement Agent Warrant in the 2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-218245) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2017)
   
10.26 Purchase Order for Deposition Tool(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 20, 2017)
   
10.27.1† Employment Agreement by and between John T. Kurtzweil and the Company, dated July 14, 2017(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 17, 2017)
   
10.27.2† Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement to be entered into by and between John T. Kurtzweil and the Company in connection with Mr. Kurtzweil’s employment(incorporated  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 17, 2017)
   
10.27.3† Form of Option Agreement to be entered into by and between John T. Kurtzweil and the Company in connection with Mr. Kurtzweil’s employment(incorporated  (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 17, 2017)
   
21.110.28† SubsidiariesSummary of the CompanyAkoustis Technologies, Inc. Director Compensation Program, effective October 3, 2017(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.110.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 14, 2017)
10.30Form of Registration Rights Agreement by and among the Company and the investors in the 2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 17, 2017)

10.34Form of Placement Agent Warrant in the 2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-218245)333-222552) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2017)January 16, 2018)
   
31.1*10.35 Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2018, by and among Akoustis Technologies, Inc., Akoustis, Inc. and Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., as representative of the several Initial Purchasers named in Schedule 1 thereto(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 15, 2018)
10.36Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2018, by and among Akoustis Technologies, Inc., Akoustis, Inc. and Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., as representative of the several Initial Purchasers named in Schedule 1 thereto(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 15, 2018)
10.37Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2018, by and among Akoustis Technologies, Inc., Akoustis, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Collateral Agent(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 15, 2018)
10.38Grant Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2018, by and among Akoustis Technologies, Inc., Akoustis, Inc. and the Town of Canandaigua(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 27, 2018)
10.39*††Price Quotation, dated January 14, 2019, by and between the Company and ASML US, LLC
10.40*†

Akoustis Technologies, Inc. 2018 Stock Incentive Plan

10.41*†

Akoustis Technologies, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan

21.1*Subsidiaries of the Company
23.1*Consent of Marcum LLP
31.1*Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer
   
31.2* Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
   
32.1* Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
   
32.2* Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

101§* Interactive Data Files of Financial Statements and Notes.
   
101.ins* Instant Document
   
101.sch* XBRL Taxonomy Schema Document
   
101.cal* XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document
   
101.def* XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document
   
101.lab* XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document
   
101.pre* XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document

  

*       
*Filed herewith
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
††

Confidential portions of this exhibit have been omitted.

45

SIGNATURES

 

†       Management contractPursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or compensatory plan or arrangement15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

AKOUSTIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Dated: September 13, 2019By:/s/ Jeffrey B. Shealy
Jeffrey B. Shealy
President and Chief Executive Officer

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SIGNATURE TITLEDATE
/s/ Jeffrey B. ShealyChief Executive OfficerSeptember 13, 2019
Jeffrey B. Shealy(Principal Executive Officer), Director
/s/ Kenneth E. BollerInterim Chief Financial OfficerSeptember 13, 2019
Kenneth E. Boller(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
/s/ Arthur E. GeissCo-Chairman of the BoardSeptember 13, 2019
Arthur E. Geiss
/s/ Jerry D. NealCo-Chairman of the BoardSeptember 13, 2019
Jerry D. Neal
/s/ Steven P. DenBaarsDirectorSeptember 13, 2019
Steven P. DenBaars
/s/ Jeffrey K. McMahonDirectorSeptember 13, 2019
Jeffrey K. McMahon
/s/ Suzanne B. RudyDirectorSeptember 13, 2019
Suzanne B. Rudy

 

46

63