UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

☒  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172023

 

or

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

☐  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________________ to ____________________

 

Commission file number:001-38029

 

 

AKOUSTIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware33-1229046
(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
  
9805 Northcross Center Court, Suite HA 
Huntersville, NC28078
(Address of principal executive offices)(Postal Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 1-704-997-5735

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  1-704-997-5735

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value

Trading SymbolName of each exchange on which registered:
Common Stock, $0.001 par valueAKTSThe NASDAQNasdaq Stock Market LLC


(NASDAQNasdaq Capital Market)

 

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes    No

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes    No 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes    No 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes    No

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large Accelerated Filer Accelerated Filer
Non-Accelerated FilerSmaller reporting company
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Emerging growth company  ☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes    No

 

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”), held by non-affiliates on December 31, 20162022 was approximately $52,512,000.$148.2 million. For purposes of this computation, shares of Common Stock held by all officers, directors, and any beneficial owners of 10% or more of the outstanding Common Stock were excluded because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates of the registrant. Such determination should not be deemed an admission that such persons are, in fact, affiliates of the registrant.

 

As of September 8, 2017,01, 2023, there were 19,084,58372,351,827 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

None.The registrant intends to file a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. Portions of such proxy statement are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Item Number and Caption Page
     
Explanatory Note 1
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information 1
     
PART I 2
     
 1.Business 2
 1A.Risk Factors 12
 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments 26
 2.Properties 26
 3.Legal Proceedings 27
 4.Mine Safety Disclosures 27
     
PART II  27
     
 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity Securities 27
 6.Selected Financial Data 28
 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 29
 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 38
 8.Financial Statements and Supplemental Data 38
 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 38
 9A.Controls and Procedures 39
 9B.Other Information 40
     
PART III  40
     
 10.Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance 40
 11.Executive Compensation 46
 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 52
 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence 53
 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services 55
     
PART IV  57
     
 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 57
     
Financial Statements F-1
Item Number and Caption Page
   
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information ii
     
PART I 1
     
 1.Business 1
 1A.Risk Factors 12
 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments 38
 2.Properties 39
 3.Legal Proceedings 39
 4.Mine Safety Disclosures 39
     
PART II  40
     
 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases Of Equity Securities 40
 6.[Reserved] 41
 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 41
 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 46
 8.Financial Statements and Supplemental Data F-1
 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 47
 9A.Controls and Procedures 47
 9B.Other Information 47
 9C.Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspection 47
     
PART III  48
     
 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 48
 11.Executive Compensation 48
 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 48
 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 48
 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services 48
     
PART IV  49
     
 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 49

 

i

 

 

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Report”) contains forward-looking statements including, without limitation, in the sections captioned “Business,” “Risk Factors,”that relate to our plans, objectives, estimates, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and elsewhere.goals. Any and all statements contained in this Reportreport that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Terms such as “may,” “will,” “might,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “project,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “strategy,” “anticipate,” “attempt,” “develop,” “plan,” “help,” “seek,” “believe,” “continue,” “intend,” “expect,” “future,” and terms of similar import (including the negative of any of the foregoing) may be intended to identify forward-looking statements. However, not all forward-looking statements may contain one or more of these identifying terms. Forward-looking statements in this Reportreport may include, without limitation, statements regarding (i) the plans and objectives of management for future operations, including plans or objectives relating to the development of commercially viable radio frequency (“RF”) filters, (ii) a projectionprojections of income (including income/loss), earnings (including earnings/loss) per share, capital expenditures, dividends, capital structure or other financial items, (iii) our future financial performance, including any such statement contained in athe management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition by management or in the results of operations included pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC,Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), (iv) our ability to efficiently utilize cash and cash equivalents to support our operations for a given period of time, (v) our ability to engage customers while maintaining ownership of our intellectual property, and (vi) the assumptions underlying or relating to any statement described in points (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) or (iii)(v) above.

 

The forward-lookingForward-looking statements are not meant to predict or guarantee actual results, performance, events or circumstances and may not be realized because they are based upon our current projections, plans, objectives, beliefs, expectations, estimates and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties and other influences, many of which are beyond our control. Actual results and the timing of certain events and circumstances may differ materially from those described by the forward-looking statements as a result of these risks and uncertainties. Factors that may influence or contribute to the inaccuracy of the forward-looking statements or cause actual results to differ materially from expected or desired results may include, without limitation, our inability to obtain adequate financing, our limited operating history, our inability to generate revenues or achieve profitability, the results of our research and development (R&D) activities, our inability to achieve acceptance of our products in the market, general economic conditions, including upturns and downturns in the industry, our limited number of patents, failure to obtain, maintain and enforce our intellectual property rights, our inability to attract and retain qualified personnel, our reliance on third parties to complete certain processes in connection with the manufacture of our products, product quality and defects, existing or increased competition, our ability to market and sell our products, our inability to successfully integrate our STC-MEMS Business (as defined below under “Business — Recent Developments — Business Developments”) in our business, our failure to innovate or adapt to new or emerging technologies, our failure to comply with regulatory requirements, results of any arbitration or litigation that may arise, stock volatility and illiquidity, our failure to implement our business plans or strategies, our failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, and our failure to maintain the Trusted Foundry accreditation of our New York fabrication facility.

our limited operating history,

our inability to generate revenues or achieve profitability,
the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, Russian-Ukrainian conflict and other sources of volatility on our operations, financial condition and the worldwide economy, including our ability to access the capital markets,
increases in prices for raw materials, labor, and fuel caused by rising inflation,

our inability to obtain adequate financing and sustain our status as a going concern,
the results of our research and development (“R&D”) activities,

our inability to achieve acceptance of our products in the market,

general economic conditions, including upturns and downturns in the industry,

existing or increased competition,

our inability to successfully scale our New York wafer fabrication facility and related operations while maintaining quality control and assurance and avoiding delays in output,

contracting with customers and other parties with greater bargaining power and agreeing to terms and conditions that may adversely affect our business,
the possibility that the anticipated benefits from our business acquisitions (including the acquisitions of RFM Integrated Device, Inc. (“RFMi”) and Grinding and Dicing Services, Inc. (“GDSI”)) will not be realized in full or at all or may take longer to realize than expected,
the possibility that costs or difficulties related to the integration of acquired businesses’ (including RFMi and GDSI’s) operations will be greater than expected and the possibility of disruptions to our business during integration efforts and strain on management time and resources,

risks related to doing business in foreign countries, including rising tensions between the United States and China,

any cybersecurity breaches or other disruptions compromising our proprietary information and exposing us to liability,

our limited number of patents,

ii

failure to obtain, maintain and enforce our intellectual property rights,
claims of infringement, misappropriation or misuse of third-party intellectual property, including the lawsuit filed by Qorvo, Inc. in October 2021, that, regardless of merit, could result in significant expense and negatively impact our business results,

our inability to attract and retain qualified personnel,

results of any arbitration or litigation that may arise,

our reliance on third parties to complete certain processes in connection with the manufacture of our products,

product quality and defects,

our ability to market and sell our products,

our failure to innovate or adapt to new or emerging technologies, including in relation to our competitors,

our failure to comply with regulatory requirements,

stock volatility and illiquidity,

our failure to implement our business plans or strategies,

our failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting

our failure to obtain or maintain a Trusted Foundry accreditation or our New York fabrication facility, and
shortages in supplies needed to manufacture our products, or needed by our customers to manufacture devices incorporating our products.

A description of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those described by the forward-looking statements in this Report appears in the section captioned “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Report.

 

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements because of the risks and uncertainties related to them and to the risk factors. Except as may be required by law, we do not undertake any obligation to update the forward-looking statements contained in this Report to reflect any new information or future events or circumstances or otherwise.

 

DEFINITIONSiii

 

DEFINITIONS

When used in this Report, the terms, “we,” “Akoustis,” the “Company,” “our,” and “us” refers to Akoustis Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its wholly owned consolidated subsidiaries, Akoustis, Inc., also a Delaware corporation, RFM Integrated Device, Inc., a Texas corporation (“RFMi”), and Akoustis Manufacturing New York,Grinding and Dicing Services, Inc., each of which are Delaware corporations.a California corporation (“GDSI”).

 


Glossary

The following is a glossary of technical terms used herein:

Acoustic wave - a mechanical wave that vibrates in the same direction as its direction of travel.

AlN - Aluminum Nitride.

Acoustic wave filter - an electromechanical device that provides radio frequency control and selection, in which an electrical signal is converted into a mechanical wave in a device constructed of a piezoelectric material and then back to an electrical signal.

Band, channel or frequency band - a designated range of radio wave frequencies used to communicate with a mobile device.

Bulk acoustic wave (BAW) - an acoustic wave traveling through a material exhibiting elasticity, typically vertical or perpendicular to the surface of a piezoelectric material.

Digital baseband - the digital transceiver, which includes the main processor for the communication device.

Duplexer - a bi-directional device that connects the antenna to the transmitter and receiver of a wireless device and simultaneously filters both the transmit signal and receive signal.

Filter - a series of interconnected resonators designed to pass (or select) a desired radio frequency signal and block unwanted signals.

Group III element nitrides - a dielectric material comprised of group IIIA element, such as boron (B), aluminum (Al) or gallium (Ga), combined with group 5A (or VA nitrogen) to form a compound semiconductor nitride such as BN, AlN, or GaN. For resonators, the dielectric is typically chosen based upon the piezoelectric constant of the material in order to generate the highest electromechanical coupling.

iv

Insertion Loss - the power losses associated with inserting a BAW filter into a circuit.

Lossy - resistive losses that result in heat generation.

Metrology - techniques used to evaluate materials, devices and circuits.

Monolithic topology - a description of an electrical circuit whereby all the elements of the circuit are fabricated at the same time using the same process flow.

Power Amplifier Duplexer (PAD) - an RF module containing a power amplifier and duplex filter components for the RFFE of a smartphone.

Piezoelectric materials - certain solid materials (such as crystals and certain ceramics) that produce a voltage in response to applied mechanical stress, or that deform when a voltage is applied to them.

Quality factor, or Q - energy stored divided by the energy dissipated per cycle. Higher Q represents a higher caliber of resonance and implies mechanical and electrical factors responsible for energy dissipation are minimal. For a given amount of energy stored in a resonator, Q represents the number of cycles resonance will continue without additional input of energy into the system.

Resonator - a device whose impedance sharply changes over a narrow frequency range and is characterized by one or more ‘resonance frequency’ due to a standing wave across the resonator’s electrodes. The vibrations in a resonator can be characterized by mechanical “acoustic” waves which travel without a characteristic sound velocity. Resonators are the building blocks for RF filters used in mobile wireless devices.

RF - radio frequency.

RF front-end (RFFE) - the circuitries in a mobile device responsible for processing the analog radio signals; located between the device’s antenna and the digital baseband.

RF spectrum - a defined range of frequencies.

Surface acoustic wave (SAW) - an acoustic sound wave traveling horizontally along the surface of a piezoelectric material.

TDD LTE - Time Division Duplex- Long-Term Evolution or a wireless standard which shares the bandwidth between transmit and receive.

Tier one - a supplier or OEM with substantial market share.

Tier two - a supplier or OEM with an established but not substantial market share.

Wafer - a thin slice of semiconductor material used in electronics for the fabrication of integrated circuits.

v

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

 

Overview

 

Akoustis Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was incorporated in 2013. The Company is an early stageemerging commercial product company focused on developing, designing, and manufacturing innovative radioRF filter solutions for the wireless industry, including for products such as smartphones and tablets, network infrastructure equipment, Wi-Fi Customer Premise Equipment (“CPE”), and defense applications. Filters are critical in selecting and rejecting signals, and their performance enables differentiation in the modules defining the RF front-end (“RFFE”). Located between the device’s antenna and its digital backend, the RFFE is the circuitry that performs the analog signal processing and contains components such as amplifiers, filters and switches. We have developed a proprietary microelectromechanical system (“MEMS”) based bulk acoustic wave (“BAW”) technology and a unique manufacturing process flow, called “XBAW ®, for our filters produced for use in RFFE modules. Our XBAW® filters incorporate optimized high purity piezoelectric materials for high power, high frequency (RF)and wide bandwidth operation. We are developing RF filters for 5G, Wi-Fi and defense bands using our proprietary resonator device models and product design kits (“PDKs”). As we qualify our RF filter products, we are engaging with target customers to evaluate our filter solutions. Our initial designs target UHB, sub-7 GHz 5G, Wi-Fi and defense bands. We expect our RF filter solutions will address problems (such as loss, bandwidth, power handling, and isolation) created by the growing number of frequency bands in the RFFE of mobile devices, infrastructure and premise equipment to support 5G, and Wi-Fi. We have prototyped, sampled and begun commercial shipment of our single-band low loss BAW filter designs for 5G frequency bands and 5 GHz and 6 GHz Wi-Fi bands which are suited to competitive BAW solutions and historically cannot be addressed with low-band, lower power handling surface acoustic wave (“SAW”) technology. Additionally, through our wholly owned subsidiary, RFMi, of which we acquired majority ownership in October 2021 and full ownership in April 2023, we operate a fabless business whereby we make sales of complementary SAW resonators, RF filters, crystal (“Xtal”) resonators and oscillators, and ceramic products—addressing opportunities in multiple end markets, such as automotive and industrial applications. We also offer back-end semiconductor supply chain services through our wholly owned subsidiary, GDSI, which we acquired in January 2023.

We own and/or have filed applications for patents on the mobile wirelesscore resonator device industry.technology, manufacturing facility and intellectual property (“IP”) necessary to produce our RF filter chips and operate as a “pure-play” RF filter supplier, providing discrete filter solutions direct to Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”) and aligning with the front- end module manufacturers that seek to acquire high performance filters to expand their module businesses. We use a patented fundamentally new piezoelectric resonatorbelieve this business model is the most direct and efficient means of delivering our solutions to the market.

Technology. Our device technology is based upon bulk-mode acoustic resonance, which we believe is superior to surface-mode resonance for high-band and ultra-high-band (“UHB”) applications that include 4G/LTE, 5G, Wi-Fi, and defense applications. Although some of our target customers utilize or manufacture the RFFE module, they may lack access to critical UHB filter technology that we call BulkONE®produce, which is necessary to compete in the manufacturing of bulk acoustic wave (BAW) resonators, the building blocks of high selectivity “RF” filters required to route signals in a smartphone or other mobile or wearable device, cellular infrastructure and WiFi routers. Filters are a critical component of the RF front-end (RFFE), and their use has multiplied with the launch and licensing of 4G/LTE, emerging 5G and WiFi frequency bands. They are used to define the range of frequencies of radio signals that are transmitted (the “passband”) and simultaneously reject unwanted signals.applications.

  

Manufacturing. We plan to use single-crystal piezoelectric materials to develop a new class of BAW RF filters with a fundamental advantage to reduce losses over existing thin filmcurrently manufacture Akoustis’ high-performance RF filter technologies. We believe our technology will be disruptive to the RFFE market through the following expected advantages:

Wider bandwidth coverage,
Smaller filter supports higher level of integration and lower manufacturing costs,
Lower insertion loss,
Improved power compression and linearity,
Reduced power amplifier cost, for the ultimate purpose of manufacturing our BAW RF filters,
Reduced heat generation and reduced battery loading, and
Reduced guard band between adjacent frequency bands.

Once our technology is qualified for mass production, we expect to design and sell single-crystal BAW RF filter productscircuits, using our BulkONE® technology. Our product focus is on innovative single-band filter products for the growing smartphone and RFFE module market, which can be used to make duplexer or multiplexer filter products necessary for the mobile market. These products present the greatest near-term potential for commercialization offirst generation XBAW® wafer process, in our technology. According to a Mobile Experts May 2016 report, the mobile filter market is expected to grow from $8.2 billion in 2017 to greater than $12 billion by 2021.

Recent Developments

Business Developments

In August 2016, we announced our first customer engagementwhen we entered into multiple non-exclusive agreements with a Chinese tier one RFFE module manufacturer to supply it with our premium RF filter products for next-generation high-band RFFE modules for 4G, emerging 4.5G and 5G mobile - targeting the China and India OEM markets. In December 2016, we announced our second customer engagement, this time for the development of a band-specific, high-frequency (above 3.5 GHz) BAW RF filter for a non-mobile commercial application with a well-established OEM, specializing in non-mobile defense systems, with annual revenues of more than $1 billion.  In May 2017, we announced our third customer engagement, this time for the development of high-performance BAW duplexers for non-mobile communication systems with a multi-billion dollar U.S. Fortune 500 company that provides systems, products and solutions to government and commercial customers worldwide.


On March 23, 2017, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement and a Real Property Purchase Agreement (collectively, the “STC-MEMS Agreements”) with The Research Foundation for the State University of New York (“RF-SUNY”) and Fuller Road Management Corporation (“FRMC”), an affiliate of RF-SUNY (collectively, “Sellers”), respectively, to acquire certain specified assets, including STC-MEMS, a semiconductor125,000-square foot wafer-manufacturing and microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) operation with associated wafer-manufacturing tools, and the associated real estate and improvementsfacility located in Canandaigua, New York used(the “New York Facility”), which we acquired in June 2017. Our SAW-based RF filter products are manufactured by a third party and sold either directly or through a sales distributor.

Intellectual Property. As of August 25, 2023, our IP portfolio included 104 patents, including a blocking patent that we have licensed from Cornell University. Additionally, as of August 25, 2023, we have 108 pending patent applications. These patents cover our XBAW® RF filter technology from raw materials through the system architectures. Given the significance of the Company’s intellectual property to its business, the Company enforces its intellectual property rights and protects its patent portfolio, which may include filing lawsuits against companies that the Company believes are infringing upon its patents. The Company considers protecting its intellectual property rights to be central to its business model and competitive position in the operationRF filter industry.

By designing, manufacturing, and marketing our RF filter products to mobile phone OEMs, defense OEMs, network infrastructure OEMs, and Wi-Fi CPE OEMs, we seek to enable broader competition among the front-end module manufacturers.

Since we own and/or have filed applications for patents on the core technology and control access to our intellectual property, we expect to offer several ways to engage with potential customers. First, we intend to engage with multiple wireless markets, providing standardized filters that we design and offer as standard catalog components. Second, we expect to deliver unique filters to customer-supplied specifications, which we will design and fabricate on a customized basis. Finally, we may offer our models and design kits for our customers to design their own filters utilizing our proprietary technology.


We expect to continue to incur substantial costs for commercialization of STC-MEMS (the assetsour technology on a continuous basis because our business model involves materials and real estatesolid-state device technology development and improvements referredengineering of catalog and custom filter design solutions. To succeed across our combined portfolio of Akoustis, XBAW, and RFMi products, we must convince customers in a wide range of industries including mobile phone OEMs, RFFE module manufacturers, network infrastructure OEMs, Wi-Fi CPE OEMs, medical device makers, automotive and defense customers to together herein as the “STC-MEMS Business”). Pursuant to the STC-MEMS Agreements, the Company also agreed to assume post acquisition date substantially all of the ongoing obligations of the STC-MEMS Business incurreduse our products in their systems and modules. For example, since there are two dominant BAW filter suppliers in the ordinary course of business.industry that have high-band technology, and both utilize such technology as a competitive advantage at the module level, we expect customers that lack access to high-band filter technology will be open to engage with our company for XBAW filters.

 

We completed the acquisition of the STC-MEMS Business throughTo help drive our wholly-owned subsidiary, Akoustis Manufacturing New York, Inc., a Delaware corporation formed in connection with the acquisition, on June 26, 2017 for an aggregate purchase price of $2.8 million in cash. The Company recorded net assets acquired of $6.3 million for purchase consideration of $4.6 million (includes $2.85 million of cash paid at closing plus $1.7m real estate contingent liability), which resulted in the recording of a bargain purchase gain of $1.7 million. The Company reviewed what factors might contribute to a bargain purchase to determine if it was reasonable for a bargain purchase to occur. We determined the factors that contributed to the bargain purchase price were:

The transaction was completed with a motivated seller who the Company believed was very hesitant to liquidate assets and lay-off employees in the current political environment.

The cash burn of the facility (approximately $3.0 million annually) was an economic burden to the sellers.
The Company, the County and State were motivated to approve the transaction without significant price negotiation, as they believed it would insure the employment of the headcount and provide the opportunity for increased headcount and increased investment in the facility that would add to the tax base.  

Based upon these factors, the Company concluded that the occurrence of a bargain purchase was reasonable.

The STC-MEMs acquisition allows the Company to internalize manufacturing, increase capacity and control its wafer supply chain for single crystal BAW RF filters. We have now successfully transferred our R&D resonatorXBAW filter process flow into the facility, andbusiness, we plan to utilize the facilitycontinue to optimize our BulkONE®pursue RF filter design and R&D development agreements and potentially joint ventures with target customers and other strategic partners, although we cannot guarantee we will be successful in these efforts. These types of arrangements may subsidize technology development costs and qualification, filter design costs, and offer complementary technology and to consolidate all aspects of wafer manufacturing for our disruptive and patented high band BAW RF filters targeting the multi-billion dollar mobilemarket intelligence and other wireless markets. This planned consolidationavenues to revenue. However, we intend to retain ownership of our core XBAW technology, intellectual property, designs, and related improvements. Across our combined portfolio of Akoustis, XBAW, and RFMi products, we expect to continue development of catalog designs for multiple customers and to offer such catalog products in multiple sales channels.

Impact of COVID-19 on our Business

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted business activity across the globe. In particular, COVID-19 contributed to delays we observed in certain suppliers’ shipment of materials necessary for us to manufacture our products and in certain vendors’ ability to deliver equipment for installation at our facilities. Although the effects of COVID-19 and its impact on our supply chain have eased since the peak of the Company’s supply chain intopandemic and related lock-down protocols imposed by local governments, including China, we will continue to actively monitor the STC-MEMS Businesssituation and may take further actions altering our business operations that we determine are in the best interests of our employees, customers, partners, suppliers, and stakeholders, or as required by federal, state, or local authorities. The effect that any such alterations or modifications may have on our business, including the effects on our customers, employees, and prospects, or on our financial results for fiscal year 2024 or beyond is unclear.

Recent Developments

On July 11, 2022, we announced that we had named Kamran Cheema as our new Chief Product Officer.

On August 9, 2022, we announced that we had shipped a second 5G mobile design in a new wafer-level-package to our first foundry customer.

On August 24, 2022, we announced that we had received a development order for two new XBAW® diplexers from a Fortune 100 Internet company.

On September 6, 2022, we announced that Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer toured our New York fabrication facility.

On September 8, 2022, we announced that we entered the gaming market with two design wins in Wi-Fi with two new customers.

On September 14, 2022, we announced that we received a development order for a new XBAW® 5G mobile filter solution for a tier-1 RF module maker.

On September 28, 2022, we announced that we received our fourth design win for a 5G network infrastructure filter.

On October 4, 2022, we announced that we had started on Junesampling two new Wi-Fi 6E and Wi-Fi 7 filter solutions.

On October 6, 2022, we announced that we had become a charter member of the Semiconductor Industry Association.

On October 26, 2017 and is expected to shorten time-to-market2022, we announced that we had received three new Wi-Fi 6E design wins for our RF products, greatly enhancing our ability to service customers uponcarrier-class applications.

On November 21, 2022, we announced that we had joined the Wi-Fi NOW industry association as an official filter partner.

On December 21, 2022, we announced the completion of development and design specifications. Furthermore, we believe that shorter time-to-market cycles provide us with the opportunity to increase the numberqualification of our potential customers.internally developed wafer-level-packaging (WLP) technology for the 5G mobile, Wi-Fi, timing control, and other markets.

 

In August 2017,On December 28, 2022, we announced our first shipmentdesign win in 5G mobile from a Tier-1 RF component company customer.

On January 4, 2023, we announced the acquisition of premium high-band BAWGDSI, a U.S.-based, trusted supplier of semiconductor back-end supply chain services.

On January 18, 2023, we announced that we had received our first high-volume 5G mobile XBAW filter order from a Tier-1 RF component company.

On January 25, 2023, we announced the closing of a public offering of common stock and full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares.

On March 23, 2023, we announced the appointment of Michelle L. Petock, CEO of W Greig & Company to our Board of Directors.

On April 4, 2023, we announced that we received a development order for Wi-Fi 6E/7 from a new RF module maker customer.

On April 11, 2023, we introduced a new C-V2X XBAW®filter prototypes manufactured usingfor the automotive market.


On April 26, 2023, we announced a volume purchase order for Wi-Fi 6E filters for a new, advanced, high-speed line of Wi-Fi 6E fixed infrastructure products. 

On May 3, 2023, we announced that we had received our patented single-crystal BulkONE® technology to the aforementioned Chinese tier onefirst Wi-Fi 7 design win from a leading enterprise-class customer. The shipment included high performance, LTE-TDD Band 41, 2.6 GHz

On May 24, 2023, we announced that we had received two new Wi-Fi 6E design wins.

On June 1, 2023, we introduced two new advanced BAW RF filters for Wi-Fi 6E and Wi-Fi 7.

One June 5, 2023, we announced that we believewould be hosting a booth at the IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium.

On June 13, 2023, we launched our new, state-of-the-art XBAW® foundry services and AI-enabled engineering design services.

On July 20, 2023, we announced that we had shipped two new BAW filters using the XBAW® foundry process to a 5G mobile and Wi-Fi router RF front-end module customer.

On July 27, 2023, we introduced a new, advanced, single-crystal AlScN on Si wafer XBAW® technology.

Financing

We have not yet achieved profitability from operations, and so have funded our operations largely with issuances of equity and debt securities, as well as development contracts, RF filter and production orders, government grants, MEMS foundry services (which we exited in 2021) and engineering services. We have historically incurred losses which are primarily the result of material and processing costs associated with developing and commercializing our technology, as well as personnel costs, professional fees (primarily accounting and legal), and other general and administrative (“G&A”) expenses. We expect to continue to incur substantial costs for the commercialization of our technology on a continuous basis because our business model involves materials and solid-state device technology development and engineering of catalog and custom filter design solutions.  

The Company expects that its current cash and cash equivalents are sufficient to fund its operations beyond the next twelve months from the date of filing of this Form 10-K. These funds will satisfybe used to fund the challenging filter requirementsCompany’s operations, including capital expenditures, R&D, commercialization of our technology, development of our patent strategy and expansion of our patent portfolio, as well as to provide working capital and funds for other general corporate purposes. Except for the $48.0 million of Common Stock remaining available to be sold under its ATM Sales Agreement with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, and Roth Capital Partners, LLC, the Company has no commitments or arrangements to obtain any additional funds, and there can be no assurance such funds will be available on acceptable terms or at all.

In the future, if the Company is unable to obtain additional financing in a timely fashion and on acceptable terms when such financing is needed, its financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected, and it may not be able to continue operations or execute its stated commercialization plan.

Recent Financing Activity

Equity Offering Program

On May 2, 2022, the Company entered into an ATM Sales Agreement with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, and Roth Capital Partners, LLC pursuant to which the Company may sell from time-to-time shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $50,000,000 (the “2022 Equity Offering Program”). On May 25, 2022, the Company announced that it was suspending sales under the 2022 Equity Offering Program. If, in the high growth 4G LTE mobile market in China. Shortly thereafter, we announced our first 3.5GHz RF filter shipmentsfuture, the Company determines to our second customer forresume sales pursuant to the 2022 Equity Offering Program, it intends to notify investors by the filing of a key Radar application.Current Report on Form 8-K or other filing with the SEC, or other public announcement.

 

Organizational DevelopmentsConvertible Note Offering

 

On August 11, 2016, we changed our fiscalJune 9, 2022, the Company issued $44.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 6.0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2027 (the “Notes”) guaranteed by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Akoustis, Inc. The Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture (the “Indenture”), dated June 9, 2022, among the Company, the Guarantor and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. The Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.0% per year from a fiscal year ending on March 31 of each year to one endinguntil maturity on June 30 of each year, effective for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017. On October 31, 2016, we filed a transition report on Form 10-K for the transition period from April 1, 2016 to June 30, 2016.

Following stockholder approval at our 2016 annual stockholders’ meeting, we changed our state of incorporation from the State of Nevada to the State of Delaware15, 2027, payable semi-annually beginning on December 15, 2016.

Glossary

2022. At the Company’s option, interest may be paid in cash and/or shares of Common Stock. The followinginitial conversion rate for the Notes is a glossary212.3142 shares of technical terms used herein:Common Stock (subject to adjustment as provided in the Indenture) per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes, which is equal to an initial conversion price of approximately $4.71 per share.

Acoustic wave — a mechanical wave that vibrates in the same direction as its direction of travel.
AlGaN— Aluminum Gallium Nitride.
AlN— Aluminum Nitride.
Acoustic wave filter — an electromechanical device that provides radio frequency control and selection, in which an electrical signal is converted into a mechanical wave in a device constructed of a piezoelectric material and then back to an electrical signal.

 


Band, channel or frequency band — a designated range of radio wave frequencies used to communicate with a mobile device.
Bulk acoustic wave (BAW) — an acoustic wave traveling through a material exhibiting elasticity, typically vertical or perpendicular to the surface of a piezoelectric material.
Digital baseband — the digital transceiver, which includes the main processor for the communication device.
Duplexer— a bi-directional device that connects the antenna to the transmitter and receiver of a wireless device and simultaneously filters both the transmit signal and receive signal.
Filter— a series of interconnected resonators designed to pass (or select) a desired radio frequency signal and block unwanted signals.
Group III element nitrides — a dielectric material comprised of group IIIA element, such as boron (B), aluminum (Al) or gallium (Ga), combined with group 5A (or VA nitrogen to form a compound semiconductor nitride such as BN, AlN, or GaN. For resonators, the dielectric is typically chosen based upon the piezoelectric constant of the material in order to generate the highest electromechanical coupling.
Insertion Loss —The power losses associated with inserting a BAW filter into a circuit.
K-Squared— electromechanical coupling factor that determines the effective bandwidth of a filter.
Lossy— resistive losses that result in heat generation.
Metrology— techniques used to evaluate materials, devices and circuits.
Monolithic topology — a description of an electrical circuit whereby all the elements of the circuit are fabricated at the same time using the same process flow.
Power Amplifier Duplexer (PAD) — an RF module containing a power amplifier and duplex filter components for the RFFE of a smartphone.
Piezoelectric materials — certain solid materials (such as crystals and certain ceramics) that produce a voltage in response to applied mechanical stress, or that deform when a voltage is applied to them.

Underwritten Offering of Common Stock

 

Quality factor, or Q — energy stored divided by the energy dissipated per cycle. Higher Q represents a higher caliber of resonance, and implies mechanical and electrical factors responsible for energy dissipation are minimal. For a given amount of energy stored in a resonator, Q represents the number of cycles resonance will continue without additional input of energy into the system.
Resonator— a device whose impedance sharply changes over a narrow frequency range and is characterized by one or more ‘resonance frequency’ due to a standing wave across the resonator’s electrodes. The vibrations in a resonator can be characterized by mechanical “acoustic” waves which travel without a characteristic sound velocity. Resonators are the building blocks for RF filters used in mobile wireless devices.
RF— radio frequency.
RF front-end (RFFE) — the circuitries in a mobile device responsible for processing the analog radio signals; located between the device’s antenna and the digital baseband.
RF spectrum— a defined range of frequencies.

On January 19, 2023, the Company closed a public offering of 12,545,454 shares of Common Stock at a price to the public of $2.75 per share pursuant to an underwriting agreement with B. Riley Securities, Inc., as representative of the several underwriters named therein. The shares of Common Stock issued at closing included 1,636,363 shares issued pursuant to the underwriters’ over-allotment option, which was exercised in full. Gross proceeds totaled $34.5 million before deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses of approximately $2.5 million, resulting in net proceeds from the offering of approximately $32.0 million. Certain of the Company’s directors and officers participated in the offering by purchasing shares on the same terms and conditions as other investors.


Surface acoustic wave (SAW) — an acoustic sound wave traveling horizontally along the surface of a piezoelectric material.
TDD LTE— Time Division Duplex- Long-Term Evolution or a wireless standard which shares the bandwidth between transmit and receive.
Tier one— a supplier or OEM with dominant market share.
Tier two—  a supplier or OEM with an established but not dominant market share.
Trusted Foundry— The Trusted Foundry Program was initiated by the Department of Defense in 2004 to ensure mission-critical national defense systems access to leading-edge integrated circuits from secure, domestic sources. Defense Microelectronics Activity (DMEA) is the manager of the Trusted Foundry Program for the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).  It is a joint DoD / National Security Agency (NSA) program and is administered by the NSA’s Trusted Access Program Office (TAPO).
Wafer— a thin slice of semiconductor material used in electronics for the fabrication of integrated circuits.

 

Our Technology

 

Our XBAW Filter Technology and Business

Current RF acoustic wave filters utilize a technology that is limited bypiezoelectric material physical properties, the material properties ofresonator device structure and the base filter component.manufacturing process technology. Existing BAW filters use an “acoustic wave ladder” that is based on a monolithic topology approach using lossy polycrystalline materials. By contrast, our BulkONE®

XBAW technology uses aencompasses cutting-edge polycrystalline, single-crystal material, which provides 30% higher piezoelectric properties, compared to conventional polycrystalline materials used in the industry today. We have fabricated R&D resonators that demonstrate the feasibility of our approach and believe our technology will yield a new generation of filter products.

BulkONE® technology consists of novel single-crystalother high purity piezoelectric materials, which are fabricated into bulk-mode, acoustic wave resonators and RF filters. Our patentedinnovative piezoelectric materials contain high-purity Group III element nitride materials and possess a unique signature, which can be detected by conventional material metrology tools. We utilize analytical modeling techniques to aid in the design and internal manufacturing of our materials, andwhereby the raw substrate materials utilized in our raw material specificationsXBAW process are typically outsourced tosourced from a third party for manufacturing.party. Once our materialsfilter designs are simulated and ready for processing,to manufacture, we supply ourthe NY fabrication facilityFacility raw materials, a mask design file, and a unique process sequence in order to fabricate our resonators and filters. OurWe hold many issued and pending patents on our XBAW wafer process flow, which is compatible with wafer level packaging (WLP) that allows for low profile, costlow-profile, cost- effective filters to be produced.

 

Technological Challenges Facing the Mobile Device Industry

 

Rising consumer demand for always-on wireless broadband connectivity is creatingcreates an unprecedented need for high performance RFFE modules for mobile devices. Mobile devices such as smartphones, tablets and tabletswearables are quickly becoming the primary means of accessing the Internet therebyand driving the Internet of Things (IoT). The rapidRapid growth in mobile data traffic is testingtests the limits of existing wireless bandwidth. Carriers and regulators have responded by opening new spectrums of RF frequencies, driving up the number of frequency bands in mobile devices. This substantial increase in frequency bands has created a demand for more filters, as well as a demand for filters with higher selectivity. The global transition to LTE and adoption of LTE-Advanced with more sophisticated carrier aggregation and multiple-input, multiple-output (MIMO) techniques will continuehas continued to push the requirements for increased supply of high performancehigh-performance filters. Furthermore, the introduction of 5G mobile technologies and their associated frequencies has created an even greater need for high-performance, high-frequency filters as the bands being auctioned have primarily been in the 3-6 GHz range, well above the frequencies of current networks.

 

Furthermore, theThe new spectrum introduced by 4G/LTE and emerging 5G is driving spectrum licensing at higher frequencies than previous 3G smartphone models. For example, new TDD LTE frequencies allocated for 4G5G wireless cover frequencies nearly twice as high as those covered in previous generation phones. As a result, the demand for filters represents the single largest growth opportunity in the RFFE industry, according to a Mobile Experts May 20162022 report. For traditional “low band” frequencies, SAW filters have been the primary choice, while high band solutions have utilized BAW filters due to their performance and yield. While there are multiple sources of supply for SAW technology, the source of supply for BAW filters is more limited and essentially dominated by two manufacturers worldwide. See “Competition” below.

 


In addition, signal loss of current generation acoustic wave filters is excessively high, and up to half of the transmit power is wasted as heat, which ultimately constrains battery life. Another challenge is that the allocated spectrum for mobile communication bands requires high bandwidth RF filters, which, in turn, requires wide bandwidth core resonator technology. In addition, filters with inferior selectivity either reduce the availablenumber or bandwidth of operating bands the mobile device can support or increase the noise in the operating bands. Each of these problems negatively impacts the end-user’s experience when using the mobile device.

 

The RFFE must meet growing data demands while reducing cost and improving battery life. Our solution involves a new approach to RFFE component manufacturing, enabled by BulkONE®XBAW technology. We expect our XBAW technology to produce filters that will reduce the overall system cost and improve performance of the RFFE.

 

Our Solutions


 

Our immediate focusXBAW Filter Solutions

Our XBAW filter business is focused on the commercialization of wide bandwidth RF filters operating in the high frequency portion ofspectrum known as the RFFE (called high band).sub 8 GHz bands. Using our BulkONE®XBAW technology, we believe these filters enable new PADpower amplifier duplexer (PAD) module or RFFE competition for high band modules as well as performance-driven low band applications. Initially, we expect to target select strategic RFFE market leaders as well as tier two mobile phone original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”)OEMs and/or RFFE module suppliers. Longer term, the focus of our focusXBAW filter business will be to expand our market share by engaging with multipleadditional mobile phone OEMs and RFFE module manufacturers. We have transitionedmanufacture our technology toXBAW wafers in our Canandaigua, NY fabrication facility andwhere we continue to focus on the commercialization of our filters using our BulkONE®XBAW technology. This will be the first in a series of R&D activities that will set the foundation for filter products that we believe can disrupt the high band filter market. We willplan to continue develop a series of filter designs to be used in the manufacturing of discrete filters, duplexers or more complex multiplexers targeting the 4G/LTE, 5G, Wi-Fi, automotive and emerging 5Gdefense frequency bands. We believe our filter designs will create an alternative for, and replace, filters currently manufactured using materials with fundamentally inferior performance. Figure 1 below illustrates characterization plots that represent the high power, high bandwidth and high frequency capability of our single crystalhigh purity piezoelectric materials.

 

Figure 1-Characteristics of our single crystalhigh purity piezoelectric materials used to fabricate our BAW RF filters.

 

 

Single-Band Discrete Designs, for Duplexers and Multiplexers

 

SAW filters have been preferredare generally desired in modern RFFE because of their high performance, small size and low cost. However, traditional SAW ladder designs do not perform well in high frequency bands or bands with closely spaced receive and transmit channels, typical of many new bands. Therefore, BAW filters are neededpreferred for these bands. We have demonstrated in a development environment our ability toIn the NY Facility, we fabricate BAW resonators, the building block of BAW filters, that are more efficient than existing available BAW resonators,offer high frequency, wide bandwidth and wehigh-power performance. We believe the improved efficiency provided by BAW filters will reduce the total cost of RFFE modules, offer efficient use of shared frequency spectrum as well as reduce the battery demand forof mobile devices. Additionally, we believe that our BulkONE® filtersXBAW technology will allow for a single manufacturing method that will support all of the BAW filter band range and a significant portion of the SAW band range. Figure 2 below illustrates what we believe will be the frequency range of our BulkONE®XBAW technology.

 


Figure 2- The potential range of our technologytechnology. 

 

 

 

Pure-Play Filter Provider Enables New Module Competition

 

Given the high sound velocity in our piezoelectric materials, ourOur XBAW technology allows for a wide range of frequency coverage, and we plan to supply XBAW filters that will support frequency bands from 2 to 20 GHz for 4G/LTE, emerging 5G, Wi-Fi, automotive and WiFi bands.defense applications. We have successfully demonstrated resonators that will support the design and fabrication of 4G/LTE filters, Wi-Fi filters and defense filters, with frequencies adjacent to the emerging 5G mobile auctions. We have transitioned our current focus is on completing the development required to transition this single-crystal BAWXBAW technology to high volume manufacturing. We willmanufacturing and aim to be a pure-play filter supplier that will address the increasing RF complexity placed on RFFE manufacturers supporting 4G/LTE 5G, and WiFi.Wi-Fi. Figure 3 illustrates the historical and projected growth in RF complexity.

 

Figure 3- Projected Increase in Filter content in Mobile Phone Front End Modules (FEMs) from 20152021 - 20212027 (Source: Ericsson 2016)Mobile Experts 2022).

 

 

 

 Commercialization


 

Our

Commercialization of XBAW Filters

The immediate focus of our XBAW filter business is on the commercialization of wide bandwidth RF filters to address the RFFEWi-Fi, Network Infrastructure and Defense bands with innovative single-band designs using our BulkONE® high band spectrumXBAW sub 8 GHz RF filter technology. We are currently developing our first commercial single-band filterXBAW filters through our STC-MEMS Business wafer fabrication facility.the NY Facility. We are focused on developing fixed-band XBAW filters because we believe these designs present the greatest near-term potential for commercialization of our technology, and that once demonstrated, the STC-MEMS facility can be more efficiently readied for production compared to alternative technologies.

 


Our technology development plan containsprocess consists of the following milestones:five phases:

 

 1.Milestone 1 (Manufacturing Gap Analysis) - Validate required materials, people, process and equipment are present for volume manufacturing.Pre-Alpha – Demonstrate basic feasibility/capabilities

 

 2.Milestone 2Alpha – Develop stable recipe (Process Transfer to STC-MEMS Business) - Design of filters, technology transfer and fabrication on high-volume manufacturing equipment, achieve fully tested wafers, and delivery of RF filter product prototypes.freeze) with limited production development

 

 3.

Milestone 3 (Complete Filter Process Capability) - Update RF filterBeta – Complete technology qualification (Process qualification) in factory to enable product design including process improvements, fabricate and test multiple wafers using the approved manufacturing process flow, calculate yields, and complete delivery of initial product prototypes.

 

 4.Milestone 4 (Production-Ready Filter Design) - FilterPre-Production – Demonstrate lead product production capabilities, release final design complete and manufacturing process locked.tools

 

 5.Milestone 5 (Product PackagingProduction – Continual improvement of process and Ramp) - Product fully packaged and ready for production, focus shift to revenue generation from filter sales.parametric performance

Milestones 1, 2 and 3 are complete. We continue to make progress on Milestones 4 and 5. We expect to generate revenues from the sale of our filters in the first half of the 2018 calendar year, after completion of Milestones 4 and 5.

 


We have completed all phases for our first generation XBAW process technology called XB1. Additionally, we have received and delivered orders for pre-production products based on our XBAW process technology, and as of end fiscal 2023, we have shipped more than 65 million XBAW filters to the 5G mobile, Wi-Fi, 5G infrastructure and defense markets.

 

ResearchResearch and Development

 

Since inception, the Company’s focus has been on developing an innovative mobile-wirelesswireless filter technology with a compelling value proposition to our potential customers and a significant and noticeable impact to the end user. Whereas today’sCompared to legacy polycrystalline material (used to manufacture RF resonators and filters) is sputtered on a metal-coated carrier,, our patented BulkONE®XBAW technology employs high quality, single-crystal resonatorpurity piezoelectric films in our resonators, which are used as the enabler to create high performance BAW RF filters. This single-crystal material isOur high purity piezoelectric materials are a key differentiator when compared to the incumbent amorphous thin-film technologies because it increasesthey increase the acoustic velocity, and the electromechanical coupling coefficient in the resonator which results in higherand/or high-power performance. These technology features allow Akoustis to engineer RF filter efficienciessolutions for a broad spectrum for multiple radio frequencies and lower power consumption, leading to simplified RFFEs, longer battery life, reduced tissue heating, and ultimately lower manufacturing costs. thus multiple end markets.

Research and development expense totaled $ 4,425,778$33.2 million for the year ended June 30, 20172023, and $1,758,701$35.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2016. These2022. R&D activities focused on single-crystal materialhigh purity piezoelectric materials development and resonator demonstration. Current R&D investments include single-crystal materials advancement, technology transfer to our manufacturing partner and resonator development, RF filter design, high yield wafer manufacturing and filter design.packaging.

 

As a result of our efforts, we have developed and recently published a measured filter designed for 3.5GHz to 3.9GHz applications.introduced multiple new BAW filters which are currently sampling and in production with multiple customers across multiple markets. Our focus is nowremains on improving the electromechanical coupling and quality factor of our resonator technology and the performance of our fabricated filters through design improvements and process optimization experiments.

 

Recent Developments in R&D

We concentrated on several products and end markets in fiscal 2023 including 5G mobile, Wi-Fi, CBRS and 5G infrastructure, and the defense market.

In 5G mobile, we have multiple active customer engagements. Our first customer is a tier-2 RF module maker that is designing RF filters using our proprietary and patented XBAW® process that will utilize our new, advanced wafer-level-packaging. This customer is expected to complete three filters designs utilizing Akoustis PDK and enter pre-production in the first half of calendar 2024. Our second customer is a tier-1 RF component company and has engaged Akoustis to develop two filters for 5G connectivity. Akoustis has shipped multiple designs to this customer over the past year in new, advanced wafer-level-packaging. Our third mobile customer is a tier-1 RF module maker that has engaged Akoustis to develop an XBAW® filter to address a challenging coexistence band in 5G mobile. We have provided a complete design to this customer for evaluation and expect to continue to work closely with this customer over next 12–18 months. Finally, our fourth mobile customer is a leading tier-1 RF module maker that has engaged Akoustis to develop a new 5G filter utilizing our new, state-of-the-art wafer-level-packaging technology. Akoustis delivered second iteration engineering samples to this customer in the second half of fiscal 2023 and expects to continue to work closely with this customer over the next 12-18 months.


Advancements in our Wi-Fi portfolio continued in fiscal 2023. With the FCC’s decision to increase the available spectrum for Wi-Fi with the ratification of 5.9-7.1 GHz in April 2020, new filters are needed that can operate at high frequency with ultra-wide bandwidth. This has driven investment in the development of both standard and custom XBAW® filters to address this new market over the past several years. We announced our first two Wi-Fi 6E filters in fiscal 2021, including a 5.5 GHz and 6.5 GHz XBAW® filter solution with 675 MHz and 1180 MHz of bandwidth. In early fiscal 2022, we entered the Wi-Fi 6E market with our first design win in August of 2021 for a multiple-in-multiple-out (MIMO) gateway product. By the end of the second quarter, we added multiple new Wi-Fi design wins and added two additional Wi-Fi 6E customers and one additional Wi-Fi 6 customer in production, exiting the quarter with five customers in production, up from one at the end of the prior calendar year.

Figure 4 –Wi-Fi 6E and emerging Wi-Fi 7 channel frequency spectrum

 

In early January 2022, we announced the addition of five additional design wins in Wi-Fi, four in Wi-Fi 6E and one in Wi-Fi 6, bringing the total number of Wi-Fi design wins to thirteen. We added two additional design wins in April 2022, bringing the total number to fifteen, and we received one additional design win in Wi-Fi 6E in the June 2022 quarter. In October 2022, we announced the addition of three new design wins in Wi-Fi 6E bringing total to nineteen. In May 2023, we announced the addition of one design win in Wi-Fi 7 and two additional design wins in Wi-Fi 6 bringing total to twenty-two. We are currently sampling and shipping volume pre-production and production filters with multiple OEMs, ODMs and SoC makers.

In June 2020, we entered into a strategic purchase agreement with a tier 1 enterprise-focused Wi-Fi OEM to create customer Wi-Fi 6E XBAW filters for a MU-MIMO enterprise router product. During fiscal 2021 and 2022, we developed multiple filters for this customer, all of which have been design-locked and successfully completed qualification in the June 2022 quarter. We entered into production with this customer in the first half of fiscal 2023.

In April, 2021, we announced that we had developed two new Wi-Fi 6E XBAW filters, a 5.6 GHz filter and a 6.6 GHz filter. The 5.6 GHz filter module covers the entire UNII 1-4 spectrum and enables an additional 80 MHz and 160 MHz channel in UNII 4, while the 6.6 GHz filter module covers the UNII 5-8 spectrum. Current Wi-Fi 6E configurations allow for the use of six 80 MHz and three 160 MHz channels in the UNII 1-3 spectrum and fourteen 80 MHz and seven 160 MHz channels in the UNII 5-8 spectrum. The XBAW 5.6/6.6 GHz coexistence filter modules allow for the use of seven 80 MHz and three 160 MHz channels in the UNII 1-4 spectrum and twelve 80 MHz and six 160 MHz channels in the UNII 5-8 spectrum. Given that the 6 GHz portion of the Wi-Fi 6E standard has begun to experience utilization relatively recently, this new XBAW coexistence solution allows for an environment of greater capacity in the 5 GHz bands. We received our first order from a tier-1 consumer-focused OEM on the same day we introduced the filters, with the first order for the development of new multi-user, multiple-in-multiple-out mesh routing products for the consumer market. In June 2023, we announced the introduction of next generation 5.6 GHz and 6.6 GHz filters with improved performance in a package greater than 4 times smaller compared to the previous generation of the product.

We have had several significant advancements in our CBRS and 5G mobile infrastructure business during fiscal 2022 and 2023. In the June quarter of fiscal 2022, we entered production with three CBRS infrastructure OEM’s, our first production ramps in mobile infrastructure. Also in that quarter, we finished the first phase development of our new 3.8 GHz filter for the US market. In late calendar 2020, the FCC auctioned frequencies between 3.7 GHz and 3.98 GHz for 5G mobile use in the United States. Carriers are currently building networks that operate between 3.7 GHz and 3.98 GHz; we are developingrunning second iteration of our filters to address these bands and expect to begin sampling our new 3.8 GHz filter to OEMs in late calendar 2023 for use in small cell base stations.

In the defense market, we built on our early successes in phased array radar and drone filters with the award of a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) contract to advance XBAW technology in October of 2020, and the award of a second DARPA contract in April 2022 to advance the Company’s XBAW technology to 18 GHz. The first program, a Direct-to-Phase-2 (DP2) program, is to facilitate MEMS development, produce novel piezoelectric materials and device designs for both commercial and defense markets. One of the major outcomes from the DP2 program is to develop a piezo MEMS (PDK) for the Company’s proprietary and patented XBAW process which is expected to support customer engagements that leverage the PDK to create devices and circuits, including RF filters, applications at frequenciesusing the XBAW process. Under the second program, the Company intends to develop a novel mode overtone approach to circumvent trade-offs inherent in traditional BAW frequency scaling approaches.

Akoustis currently has 17 commercial XBAW filters in its production and greater than 5GHz.18 XBAW filters in development. Current product catalog filters include a 5.6 GHz Wi-Fi filter, a 5.2 GHz Wi-Fi filter, a 5.5 GHz Wi-Fi-6E filter, a 6.5 GHz Wi-Fi 6E filter, three small cell 5G network infrastructure filters including two Band n77 filters and one Band n79 filter, a 3.8 GHz filter for defense phased-array radar applications, and a 3.6 GHz filter for the CBRS 5G infrastructure market. New developments include standard catalog and custom filters for the sub-7 GHz bands targeting 5G mobile device, network infrastructure, Wi-Fi CPE, automotive and defense markets.


Our RFMi Technology and Business

RFMi is focused on supplying SAW and Xtal based frequency components to automotive, industrial IoT, medical, telecom, consumer, and other markets. The performanceteam designs, develops and markets under RFMi-branded SAW band pass filters, notch filters, diplexers, duplexers, resonators and delay lines, as well as Xtal resonators, temperature sensing Xtal resonators, temperature compensated crystal oscillators (“TCXO"), voltage controlled temperature compensated crystal oscillators (“VCTCXO”), crystal oscillators (“XO"), voltage controlled crystal oscillators (“VCXO”), oven controlled crystal oscillators (“OCXO”) and Xtal filters, etc.

Technological Challenges Facing Customers for RFMi-branded Solutions

While wireless spectrum expands to above 3GHz where Akoustis XBAW products are focused, the spectrum under 3GHz is also becoming more and more crowded. Customers are losing “guard bands” next to their operating spectrum to competing applications and operators, and “co-existence” has become necessary for functionality for wireless electronics. LTE applications increasingly need to co-exist with Industrial, Scientific, and Medical (“ISM”) band applications, satellite signals are interfered by terrestrial signals, industrial wireless control signals are saturated by communication signals, even medical wireless signals can be interrupted by other RF power outputs. The more traditional filtering technologies, like L-C (inductor – capacitor) and ceramic filters, may not have a Q factor high enough to supply steep roll-off from passband to rejection band. On the other hand, the demand for available data has also exploded, due to the increasing speed of early workdata transmission and digital communication, which requires faster and more accurate piezo-ceramic resonators.

Our RFMi-branded Solutions for the RFMi Customers

RFMi is addressing jamming and high data rate problems by focusing on frequency components and supplying diverse and flexible SAW and Xtal products. In its operation spectrum (about 30MHz to 3GHz), SAW technology offers one of the highest Q factors. RFMi provides custom and standard SAW band pass filters to allow a signal spectrum to pass while rejecting the other signals, as well as a SAW diplexer with one input and two output, SAW duplexers that transmit and receive simultaneously for Frequency Division Duplex (“FDD”) applications, and SAW resonators resonating at 5.798GHz was presentedfor high frequency transmitters, as well as custom delay lines. For Xtal products, instead of only supplying standard Xtal resonators at a technical conference showingfew frequencies, RFMi provides a family of Xtal products and supports custom designs to accommodate a wider temperature range than standard products, stable frequency, and low jitter and phase noise.

Our GDSI Services and Business

GDSI supplies advanced back-end wafer processing and supply chain services to over 250 customers across multiple industries including automotive, IoT, defense, medical, optical and communications. Its services process multiple materials including silicon, silicon carbide, silicon germanium, fused silica, quartz, alumina, ceramics, MEMS, optical filers and components, gallium nitride and PZT.

Service Challenges Facing Customers of GDSI-branded Solutions

Semiconductor manufacturers in North America typically use overseas assembly and test (“OSAT”) partners for die preparation, which can take multiple weeks for service and delivery of a finished product. GDSI is an electromechanical coupling coefficient (k2eff )ideal partner for complex die preparation for North American customers as it can offer same day service, in addition to advanced prototyping and production capacity for customers with low lead times. Additionally, GDSI has ISO, ITAR and Trusted Foundry Supplier (CAT 1A rank) accreditations, allowing it to service defense companies in the United States that often cannot outsource production to overseas partners.

Our GDSI-branded Solutions for GDSI Customers

GDSI offers wafer-thinning services for wafers up to 300 millimeters, die grinding, ultra-thin wafer grinding at greater than 50um, bonded wafers, and bumped wafers. The services offer tight tolerances for TTV and final thickness accuracy, 3DICs/TSV with via reveal or grinding into interposer, DBG for ultra-thin die or increased die strength. GDSI also offers wafer polishing services for wafers up to 200 millimeters using a chemical mechanical polish with a mirror finish with a Ra<10A, increased die strength, reduced warpage and which removes sub-surface damage. The division also offers a stealth dicing process for wafers up to 300 millimeters, which is a completely dry process with frontside and backside processing capability for wafers with a thickness range of 6.5%, obtained after de-embedding resonator characteristics from measured data.75um to 800um. Additionally, GDSI can offer coring services, device pick-and-place and automated inspection services.

 

Raw Materials

Figure 4- Akoustis’ single crystal undoped AIN piezoelectric technology based 3.7GHz filter performance. The plot shows measured narrow band S21 and S11 for the fabricated 3.7GHz filter, showing minimum insertion loss of approximately 2.dB.

 

Raw Materials

Within its internal manufacturing operation for XBAW filters, Akoustis sources raw materials, process gases, metals and other miscellaneous supplies to fabricate its BAW RF filter circuits. Materials range from substrates (used to deposit key piezoelectric materials) to standard dielectric-based laminates (used for packaging of the RF filter circuits). The Company sources at least two types of substrate materials for its BAW process and the Company haswe have more than one supplier for eachone material type.and a single source for the other. Multiple process gases are used for material synthesis, process etching and wafer treatment. While there is more than one supplier for most process gases, the purity levels of such gases may change by source. Hence, either purification or process requalification may be required as purchasewhen purchasing from a second source is required. Akoustis sources various high purity metals for electrode formation and interconnect layers for its RF circuits. Such metals are available in various purity levels and are available from more than one supplier. Other process handling hardware common to the semiconductor industry is available in abundance from multiple suppliers. Consistent with other semiconductor manufacturers, the Company may have to work with all its suppliers to ensure adequate supply of raw materials, process gases and metals as the Company ramps from R&D into high volume manufacturing.

 


RFMi Supply Chain

RFMi mainly relies on its contract manufacturer, Tai-Saw Technology Co., Ltd. (“TST”) to source raw materials, such as different chemicals and gases for front and back-end manufacturing, quartz, lithium tantalate and certain bonded wafers, metal targets, Xtal blanks, semiconductor IC’s, aluminum bonding wires and flip chip gold stub bump supplies, packages and lids. Most raw materials have dual or multi-sources. However, certain materials, e.g., high temperature co-fired ceramic (“HTCC”) ceramic packages, bonded wafers and automotive grade TCXO/VCTCXO IC’s are single-sourced as there is no alternative supplier or the alternative supplier does not guarantee automotive grade materials. Many of RFMi’s customers are automotive and require a Production Part Approval Process (“PPAP”), where using an alternative source may require re-PPAP and take efforts and time. RFMi intends to diversity its supply chain, however, it takes time and resources. Certain raw material, like HTCC ceramic packages, may not have a second source for the foreseeable future.

Intellectual Property

 

We rely on a combination of intellectual property rights, including patents and trade secrets, along with copyrights, trademarks and contractual obligations and restrictions to protect our core technology and business.

 

In the United States and internationally, as of August 25, 2023, our IP portfolio included 104 patents, including one blocking patent that we have fourteen (14) patents, of which three (3) patents are the subject to a license agreement requiring further negotiation, in addition to sixteen (16)licensed from Cornell University. Additionally, we have 108 active and pending patent applications. These patents cover our XBAW RF filter technology from the substrate level through the system application layer. Where possible, we leverage both federal and state level R&D grants to support development and commercialization of our technology. Our intellectual property relates directly to our single-crystal BAW technology, including materials and device designs, methods of manufacture, integrated circuit designs, wafer packaging, and point of use (to include mobile applications). Ourowned patents expire between 20312034 and 2033.2040. We intend to continue to innovate and expand our patent portfolio, and when appropriate, we will look to purchase license(s) that grant access to additional intellectual property that enables, enhances or further expands our technical capabilities and/or product.

 

We believe that it is likely that Akoustis will havehas competitive advantages from rights granted under our patent applications. Some applications, however, may not result in the issuance of any patents. In addition, any future patent may be opposed, contested, circumvented or designed around by a third party or found to be unenforceable or invalidated. Others may develop technologies that are similar or superior to our proprietary technologies, duplicate our proprietary technologies or design around patents owned or licensed by us.

 

We generally control access to, and use of, our confidential information through the use of internal and external controls, including contractual protections with employees, contractors and customers. We rely in part on the United States and international copyright laws to protect our intellectual property. All employees and consultants are required to execute confidentiality and intellectual property assignment agreements in connection with their employment and consulting relationships with us. We also require them to agree to disclose and assign to us all inventions conceived or made in connection with the employment or consulting relationship.

 

Akoustis and BulkONE are trademarks of Akoustis, Inc.Competition

 

Competition

The RF filter market is controlled by a relatively small number of RF component suppliers. These companies include, among others, Broadcom (previously known as Avago Technologies Ltd.),Corporation, Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.(“Murata”), Qorvo, Inc., Skyworks Solutions Inc., Taiyo Yuden Co. Ltd., and TDK Epcos.Qualcomm Incorporated. Broadcom Corporation and Qorvo, Inc. dominate the high band BAW filter market, controlling a significant portion of the customer base and are increasing capacity to meet the growing RF filter demand of the 4G/LTE5G cellular market.

 

Upon completion of our product development, we willWe compete directly with these companies to secure design slots inside RFFE modules -module targeting companies that procure filters or internally source filters. While many of our competitors have more resources than we have, we believe that our filter designs will be superior in performance, and we will approach prospective customers as a pure-play filter supplier, offering advantages in performance over the full frequency range at competitive costs. Our challenge will be to convincechallenges include convincing our customers that we have a strong intellectual property position, we will be able to deliver in volume, that we will meet their price targets, and that we can satisfy quality, reliability and other requirements. For a list of other competitive factors, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors - We are still developing many of our products, and they may not be accepted in the market.”

 


Employees

 

The Xtal market is more mature and there are many players, including Epson, KDS Daishinku, Kyocera, Murata and NDK from Japan and TXC from Taiwan. Our RFMi products are largely focused on niche markets such as Industrial IoT and professional audio, which may reduce competition with these large, high volume competitors. In addition, our RFMi products primarily consist of TCXO, VCTCXO and VCXO, instead of low cost Xtal. However, we may still compete with market participants with more resources and purchasing power than us.

Employees

We place an emphasis on hiring the best talent at the right time to enable our core technology and business growth. This includes establishing a competitive compensation and benefits package, thereby enhancing our ability to recruit experienced personnel and key technologists. We currently haveAs of June 30, 2023, we had a total of 58222 full-time employees plus 5 part-time employees, including 33 full-time employees located in the Canandaigua NY facility and 25 full-time and 5 part-time employees in our North Carolina facility.employees. We will continue to hire specific and targeted positions to further enable our technology and manufacturing capabilities as and when appropriate.

 

Government Regulations

 

Our business and products in development are or may become subject to regulation by various federal and state governmental agencies, including the radio frequency emission regulatory activities of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”(the “FCC”), the consumer protection laws of the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”), the import/export regulatory activities of the Department of Commerce, international traffic in arms regulations (ITAR) administered by the Department of State, the product safety regulatory activities of the Consumer Products Safety Commission, and the environmental regulatory activities of the Environmental Protection Agency.Agency (the “EPA”).

 

The rules and regulations of the FCC limit the RF used by, and level of power emitting from, electronic equipment. Our RF filters, as a key element enabling consumer electronic smartphone equipment, are required to comply with these FCC rules and may require certification, verification or registration of our RF filters with the FCC. Certification and verification of new equipment requires testing to ensure the equipment’s compliance with the FCC’s rules. The equipment must be labeled according to the FCC’s rules to show compliance with these rules. Testing, processing of the FCC’s equipment certificate or FCC registration and labeling may increase development and production costs and could delay the implementation of our BulkONE®XBAW acoustic wave resonator technology for our RF filters and the launch and commercial productions of our filters into the U.S. market. Electronic equipment permitted or authorized to be used by us through FCC certification or verification procedures must not cause harmful interference to licensed FCC users, and may be subject to RF interference from licensed FCC users. Selling, leasing or importing non-compliant equipment is considered a violation of FCC rules and federal law, and violators may be subject to an enforcement action by the FCC. Any failure to comply with the applicable rules and regulations of the FCC could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition by increasing our compliance costs and/or limiting our sales in the United States.

 

Like our XBAW products, RFMi’s SAW and Xtal products are frequency components and are subject to similar FCC rules. For instance, many of RFMi’s customers operate in ISM (Industrial, Scientific, and Medical) band, MICS (Medical Implant Communication System), WMTS (Wireless Medical Telemetry Service) and other bands regulated by FCC, in which transmission power level is restricted and products have to pass the FCC, and in certain cases FDA certification to be allowed in the market. Even though RFMi’s components do not need to be certified by FCC and/or FDA, our customers modules and systems which incorporate RFMi components may need to be certified. Any failure of RFMi’s customers to be certified would affect RFMi’s sales.

The semiconductor and electronics industries also have been subject to increasing environmental regulations. A number of domestic and foreign jurisdictions seek to restrict the use of various substances, a number of which have been used in our products in development or processes. While we have implemented a compliance program to ensure our product offering meets these regulations, there may be instances where alternative substances will not be available or commercially feasible, or may only be available from a single source, or may be significantly more expensive than their restricted counterparts. Additionally, if we were found to be non-compliant with any such rule or regulation, we could be subject to fines, penalties and/or restrictions imposed by government agencies that could adversely affect our operating results. Our cost to maintain compliance with existing environmental regulations is expected to be nominal based on our structure in which we outsource a majority of our operations to suppliers that are responsible for meeting environmental regulations. We will continue to monitor our quality program and expand as required to maintain compliance and ability to audit our supply chain.

 

Noncompliance with applicable regulations or requirements could subject us to investigations, sanctions, mandatory product recalls, enforcement actions, disgorgement of profits, fines, damages, civil and criminal penalties, or injunctions. An adverse outcome in any such litigation could require us to pay contractual damages, compensatory damages, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. These enforcement actions could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. If any governmental sanctions are imposed, or if we do not prevail in any possible civil or criminal litigation, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, responding to any action will likely result in a significant diversion of management’s attention and resources and an increase in professional fees.

 

Recent Legislation

On August 9, 2022, President Biden signed into law the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022, which appropriates funds to support the construction of semiconductor plants in the United States and advancement of United States semiconductor research and development. The Company is seeking to expand its domestic manufacturing footprint including both semiconductors and advanced packaging at our NY campus under the DoC Chips for America program. We are currently awaiting feedback on our pre-application from the DoC and we expect to file a final application by the end of the calendar year.


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

An investment in shares of our Common Stock is highly speculative and involves a high degree of risk. We face a variety of risks that may affect our operations or financial results, and many of those risks are driven by factors that we cannot control or predict. Before investing in our Common Stock, you should carefully consider the following risks, together with the financial and other information contained in this Report. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our Common Stock would likely decline and you may lose all or a part of your investment. Only those investors who can bear the risk of loss of their entire investment should invest in our Common Stock.

Prospective investors should consider carefully whether an investment in the Company is suitable for them in light of the information contained in this Report and the financial resources available to them. The risks described below do not purport to be all the risks to which the Company or the Company could be exposed. This section is a summary of the risks that we presently believe are material to the operations of the Company. Additional risks of which we are not presently aware or which we presently deem immaterial may also impair the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

 

Risk Factors Summary

Risks Related to our Business and the Industry in Which Wewhich we Operate

We have a limited operating history upon which investors can evaluate our business and future prospects.
We may not generate sufficient revenues to achieve profitability.
We have recently engaged, and may in the future engage, in acquisitions that could disrupt our business, cause dilution to our shareholders and harm our financial condition and operating results.
We are subject to a number of restrictive covenants relating to our indebtedness, which may restrict our business and financing activities.
Our business, results of operation and financial condition have been, and could in the future be, adversely affected by a pandemic, epidemic or other public health emergency.
The industry and the markets in which the Company operates are highly competitive and subject to rapid technological change.
We are still developing many of our products, and they may not be accepted in the market.
Winning business in the semiconductor industry is subject to a lengthy process that often requires us to incur significant expense, from which we may ultimately generate no revenue.
We face risks associated with the operation of our manufacturing facility.
The ongoing supply shortage experienced by the semiconductor industry has disrupted, and will likely continue to disrupt normal business activity, and may have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
The average selling prices of semiconductor products in our markets have often decreased rapidly and may do so in the future.
Problems in scaling our manufacturing operations or poor manufacturing yields could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Industry overcapacity could cause us to underutilize our manufacturing facilities and have a material adverse effect on our financial performance.
We face intense competition, which may cause pricing pressures, decreased gross margins and loss of potential market share and may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We contract with a number of large service providers and product companies that have considerable bargaining power, which may require us to agree to terms and conditions that could have an adverse effect on our business or ability to recognize revenues.
We may be subject to risks related to doing business in, and having counterparties based in, foreign countries.
Economic regulation in China could adversely impact our business and results of operations.
We depend on a few large customers for a substantial portion of our revenue.
Global shortages in manufacturing capacities could negatively affect our operations and negatively impact our results of operations.
Changes in general economic conditions, together with other factors, cause significant upturns and downturns in the industry, and our business, therefore, may also experience cyclical fluctuations in the future.
If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel to contribute to the development, manufacture and sale of our products, we may not be able to effectively operate our business.

 


Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

If we fail to obtain, maintain and enforce our intellectual property rights, we may not be able to prevent third parties from using our proprietary technologies.
We have a limited number of patent applications, which may not result in issued patents or patents that fully protect our intellectual property.
We are and may in the future be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents, which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful.
We need to protect our trademark rights and disclosure of our trade secrets to prevent competitors from taking advantage of our goodwill.
Development of certain technologies with our customers or manufacturers may result in restrictions on jointly-developed intellectual property.
We are and may be subject to claims of infringement, misappropriation or misuse of third party intellectual property that, regardless of merit, could result in significant expense and loss of our intellectual property rights.

Risks Related to our Financial Condition

We have a history of losses, will need substantial additional funding to continue our operations and may not achieve or sustain profitability in the future.

Servicing our debt requires a significant amount of cash or Common Stock, and we may not have sufficient cash flow from our business or have the ability to issue the necessary number of shares of Common Stock to pay our substantial debt.

Risks Related to Regulatory Requirements

Government regulation may adversely affect our business.
We may incur substantial expenses in connection with regulatory requirements, and any regulatory compliance failure could cause our business to suffer.
There could be an adverse change or increase in the laws and/or regulations governing our business.

Investment Risks

Our common stock has been thinly traded and its share price in the public markets has experienced, and may in the future experience, extreme volatility.
Stockholders may experience dilution of their ownership interests because of the future issuance of additional shares of our stock or other securities.

General Risk Factors

Security breaches and other disruptions could compromise our proprietary information and expose us to liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.
Litigation or legal proceedings, including product liability claims, could expose us to significant liabilities, occupy a significant amount of our management’s time and attention and damage our reputation.
There could be an adverse change or increase in the laws and/or regulations governing our business.


Risks Related to our Business and the Industry in which we Operate

We have a limited operating history upon which investors can evaluate our business and future prospects.

 

We are an early stageemerging commercial company that has not yet begun anybegan meaningful commercial operations. Historically, we were a shell company with no operating history and no assets other than cash. Upon consummation of a merger with Akoustis, Inc.operations in May 2015, we redirected our business focus towards the development of2019 by selling advanced single-crystal BAW filter products for RFFEs for use in the mobile wireless device industry. Although Akoustis since its inceptionHistorically, we have primarily focused its activity on R&D of high efficiency acoustic wave resonator technology utilizing single-crystal piezoelectric materials, this technology has not yet obtained marketing approval or been verified in commercial manufacturing, and its RF filters have not generated any material level of sales.become profitable from operations.

 

Since our expectations of potential customers and future demand for our products are based on estimates of planned operations rather thanonly limited experience, it is difficult for our management and our investors to accurately forecast and evaluate our future prospects and our revenues. Our proposed progression of our operations areis therefore subject to all of the risks inherent in light of the expenses, difficulties, complications and delays frequently encountered in connection with the formationgrowth of any new business and the development of a product, as well as those risks that are specific to our business in particular. An investment in an early stage company such as ours involves a degree of risk, including the possibility that your entire investment may be lost. The risks include, but are not limited to, our reliance on third parties to complete some processes for the manufacturing and packaging of our product,products, the possibility that we will not be able to develop functional and scalable products, or that although functional and scalable, our products and/or services will not be accepted in the market. To successfully introduce and market our products at a profit, we must establish brand name recognition and competitive advantages for our products. There are no assurances that the Company can successfully address these challenges. If it is unsuccessful, the Company and its business, financial condition and operating results will be materially and adversely affected.

 


We may not generate sufficient revenues orto achieve profitability.

 

We have incurred operating losses since our inception and expect to continue to have negative cash flow from operations. We have only generated minimal revenues from shipment of product while our primary sources of funds have been R&D grants, private placementsMEMS foundry services (which we exited in 2021), issuances of our equity, and debt. We have experienced net losses of approximately $15.8 million for the period from May 12, 2014 (inception) to June 30, 2017. Our future profitability will depend on our ability to create a sustainable business model and generate sufficient revenues, which is subject to a number of factors, including our ability to successfully implement our strategies and execute our R&D plan, our ability to implement our improved design and cost reductions into manufacturing of our RF filters, the availability of funding, market acceptance of our products, consumer demand for end products incorporating our products, our ability to compete effectively in a crowded field, our ability to respond effectively to technological advances by timely introducing our new technologies and products, and global economic and political conditions.

 


Our future profitability also depends on our expense levels, which are influenced by a number of factors, including the resources we devote to developing and supporting our projects and potential products, the continued progress of our research and development of potential products, our ability to improve R&D efficiencies, license fees or royalties we may be required to pay, and the potential need to acquire licenses to new technology, the availability of intellectual property for licensing or acquisition, or the use of our technology in new markets, which could require us to pay unanticipated license fees and royalties in connection with these licenses.

 

Our development and commercialization efforts may prove more expensive than we currently anticipate, and we may not succeed in increasing our revenues to offset higher expenses. These expenses, among other things, may cause our net income and working capital to decrease. If we fail to generate sufficient revenue and manage our expenses, we may never achieve profitability, which would adversely and materially affect our ability to provide a return to our investors.

 

We have recently engaged, and may in the future engage, in acquisitions that could disrupt our business, cause dilution to our shareholders and harm our financial condition and operating results.

In October 2021, we acquired a majority ownership position in RFM Integrated Device, Inc. (“RFMi”) and, on April 29, 2022, exercised the right to acquire the remaining 49%. In January 2023, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Grinding and Dicing Services, Inc. (“GDSI”). The consideration for the acquisitions has included cash, common stock, a secured promissory note, as well as a possible earn-out payment with respect to RFMi that may be paid in cash or common stock based on its future trading price. We may in the future make additional acquisitions of, or investments in, companies that we believe have products or capabilities that are a strategic or commercial fit with our current business or otherwise offer opportunities for our company. In connection with these acquisitions or investments, we may:

issue common stock or other forms of equity that would dilute our existing shareholders’ percentage of ownership,

incur debt and assume liabilities, and

incur amortization expenses related to intangible assets or incur large and immediate write-offs.

We may not be able to complete acquisitions on favorable terms, if at all. If we do complete an acquisition, such as of RFMi and GDSI, we cannot assure you that it will ultimately strengthen our competitive position, that it will be viewed positively by customers, financial markets or investors or that we will otherwise realize the expected benefits of such an acquisition to the anticipated extent or at all. Furthermore, the acquisitions of RFMi and GDSI and any future acquisitions could pose numerous additional risks to our expected operations, including, but not limited to:

problems integrating the purchased business, products or technologies,

challenges in achieving strategic objectives, cost savings and other anticipated benefits,

increases to our expenses,

the assumption of significant liabilities, which may have been previously unknown or not discoverable through diligence, that exceed the limitations of any applicable indemnification provisions or the financial resources of any indemnifying party,

inability to maintain relationships with prospective key customers, vendors and other business partners of the acquired businesses,


diversion of management’s attention from its day-to-day responsibilities,

difficulty in maintaining controls, procedures and policies during the transition and integration,

entrance into marketplaces where we have no or limited prior experience and where competitors have stronger marketplace positions,

potential stockholder litigation challenging the acquisition, which could result in significant costs of defense, indemnification and liability,

potential loss of key employees, particularly those of the acquired entity, and

historical financial information may not be representative or indicative of our results as a combined company.

Acquisitions may also have unanticipated tax, legal, regulatory and accounting ramifications, including recording goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets that are subject to impairment testing on a regular basis and potential periodic impairment charges and incurring amortization expenses related to certain intangible assets.

If our goodwill and intangible assets on our consolidated balance sheet arising from the RFMi and GDSI acquisitions become impaired, it would require us to record a material charge to earnings in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

As a result of our acquisitions of RFMi and GDSI, we recorded approximately $14.6 million of goodwill and $17.7 million of intangible assets which are currently shown as assets on our consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2023. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) require us to test our goodwill and intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if indicators for potential impairment exist. The testing required by GAAP involves estimates and judgments by management. Although we believe our assumptions and estimates are reasonable and appropriate, any changes in key assumptions, including a failure to meet business plans or other unanticipated events and circumstances, may affect the accuracy or validity of such estimates. If in the future we determine that an impairment exists, we may be required to record a material charge to earnings in our consolidated financial statements during the period in which any impairment of our goodwill or intangible assets is determined.

We are subject to a number of restrictive covenants relating to our indebtedness, which may restrict our business and financing activities.

The indenture governing our convertible notes imposes operating and other restrictions on us. Such restrictions may affect, and in many respects limit or prohibit, among other things, our ability to:

incur or guarantee additional indebtedness;

issue preferred stock or stock of any subsidiary;

make investments or acquisitions;

merge, consolidate, dissolve or liquidate;


engage in certain asset sales (including the sale of stock of our subsidiary);

grant liens (except permitted liens);

pay dividends;

engage in transactions with our affiliates; and

enter into a new line of business.

The restrictions in the indenture governing the convertible notes may prevent us from taking actions that we believe would be in the best interests of our business, and may make it difficult for us to successfully execute our business strategy or effectively compete with companies that are not similarly restricted. We also may incur future debt obligations that might subject us to additional restrictive covenants that could affect our financial and operational flexibility. Our ability to comply with these covenants in future periods will largely depend on the pricing of our products and services, and our ability to successfully implement our overall business strategy. We cannot assure you that we will be granted waivers or amendments to these agreements if for any reason we are unable to comply with these agreements. The breach of any of these covenants and restrictions could result in a default under the indenture governing the convertible notes, which could result in an acceleration of our indebtedness.

Our business, results of operation and financial condition have been, and could in the future be, adversely affected by a pandemic, epidemic or other public health emergency.

The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on worldwide economic activity and caused disruptions in our supply chain and distribution networks as well as sales activity. Another pandemic, including a new COVID-19 variant, or other public health emergency, together with preventative measures taken to contain or mitigate such crises, could adversely impact our results of operations and financial conditions. In addition, a pandemic or other public health emergency could impact the proper functioning of financial and capital markets, foreign currency exchange rates, product and energy costs, labor supply and costs, and interest rates. Any pandemic or other public health emergency could also amplify the other risks and uncertainties described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We cannot reasonably predict the ultimate impact of any pandemic or other public health emergency, including the extent of any adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition, which will depend on, among other things, the duration and spread, the impact of governmental regulations that may be imposed in response, the effectiveness of actions taken to contain or mitigate the outbreak, the availability, safety and efficacy of vaccines, including against emerging variants of the infectious disease, and global economic conditions.


Our sales efforts typically function by in-person meetings with customers and potential customers to discuss our products. The method and timing of these meetings has been altered due to stay-at-home orders and travel restrictions relating to COVID-19. This limitation on the ability of our sales personnel to maintain their customary interaction with customers may negatively affect demand for our products. We have also found that potential customers have been forced to slow and reprioritize various product development projects as a result of COVID-19. This disruption to our sales activity and our customers’ businesses, and the resulting delay in the growth of our business, may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Furthermore, a reduction or delay in revenues will prolong our dependence on capital raising to finance our operations.

The industry and the markets in which the Company operates are highly competitive and subject to rapid technological change. Therefore, in order for our products to be competitive and achieve market acceptance, we need to keep pace with rapid development of new process technologies.

 

The markets in which we intend to compete are intensely competitive. We will operate primarily in the industry that designs and produces semiconductor components for wireless communications and other wireless devices, which is subject to rapid changes in both product and process technologies based on demand and evolving industry standards. The intended markets for our products are characterized by:

 

 rapid technological developments and product evolution,

 rapid changes in customer requirements,

 frequent new product introductions and enhancements,

 continuous demand for higher levels of integration, decreased size and decreased power consumption,

 short product life cycles with declining prices over the life cycle of the product, and

 evolving industry standards.

 

The continuous evolutions of these technologies and frequent introduction of new products and enhancements have generally resulted in short product life cycles for wireless semiconductor products, in general, and for RFFEs, in particular. Our R&D activity and resulting products could become obsolete or less competitive sooner than anticipated because of a faster than anticipated change in one or more of the above-noted factors. Therefore, in order for our RF filtersproducts to be competitive and achieve market acceptance, we need to keep pace with rapid development of new process technologies, which requires us to:

 

 respond effectively to technological advances by timely introducing new technologies and products,

 successfully implement our strategies and execute our R&D plan in practice,

 improve the efficiency of our technology, and

 implement our improved design and cost reductions into manufacturing of our RF filters.

 

13 

We are still developing many of our products, and they may not be accepted in the market.

 

Although we believe that our BulkONE®XBAW acoustic wave resonator technology, thatwhich utilizes single-crystalhigh purity piezoelectric materials, will provideprovides material advantages over existing RF filters technologies, and we have developed and are currently developing various methods of integration suitable for implementation of this technology tointo RF filters, we cannot be certain that our RF BAW filters will be able to achieve or maintain market acceptance. While we have fabricated R&D resonatorsfilters that demonstrate the feasibilityperformance of our BulkONE®XBAW technology, we are still in the process of stabilizing this technology into our NY fabrication facility for manufacturing of our RF filters, and this technology has been qualified for mass production, the Company is not verified yet in practice or onundergoing a critical production ramp to commercial scale. There are also no recordsassurances that we can demonstrate our ability to successfully overcome many of the risks and uncertainties frequently encountered by companies in new and rapidly evolving fields. In addition to our limited operating history, we will depend on a limited number of manufacturers and customers for a significant portion of our revenue in the future and we cannot guarantee their acceptance of our products. Each of these factors may adversely affect our ability to implement our business strategy and achieve our business goals.

 


The successful development of our BulkONE®XBAW technology and market acceptance of our RF BAW filters will be highly complex and will depend on the following principal competitive factors, including our ability to:

 

 comply with industry standards and effectively compete against current technology for producing RF acoustic wave filters,

 differentiate our products from offerings of our competitors by delivering RF BAW filters that are higher in quality, reliability and technical performance,

 anticipate customer and market requirements, changes in technology and industry standards and timely develop improved technologies that meet high levels of satisfaction of our potential customers,

 maintain, grow and manage our internal teams to the extent we increase our operations and develop new segments of our business,

 develop and maintain successful collaborative, strategic, and other relationships with manufacturers, customers and contractors,

 protect, develop or otherwise obtain adequate intellectual property for our technology and our filters; and

 

 obtain strong financial, sales, marketing, technical and other resources necessary to develop, test, manufacture, commercialize and market our filters.

 

If we are unsuccessful in accomplishing these objectives, we may not be able to compete successfully against current and potential competitors. As a result, our BulkONE®XBAW technology and our RF filters may not be accepted in the market and we may never attain profitability.

 

Winning business in the semiconductor industry is subject to a lengthy process that often requires us to incur significant expense, from which we may ultimately generate no revenue.

Our business is dependent on us winning competitive bid selection processes, known as “design wins”. These selection processes are typically lengthy and can require us to dedicate significant development expenditures and scarce engineering resources in pursuit of a single customer opportunity. Failure to obtain a particular design win may prevent us from obtaining design wins in subsequent generations of a particular product. This can result in lost revenue and can weaken our position in future selection processes.

Winning a product design does not guarantee sales to a customer. A delay or cancellation of a customer’s plans could materially and adversely affect our financial results, as we incur significant expense in the design process and may generate little or no revenue from it. In addition, the timing of design wins is unpredictable and implementing production for a major design win, or multiple design wins at the same time, may strain our resources and supply chain. In such event, we may be forced to dedicate significant additional resources and incur additional costs and expenses. Further, often customers will only purchase limited numbers of evaluation units until they qualify the products and/or the manufacturing line for those products. The qualification process can take significant time and resources. Delays in qualification or failure to qualify our products may cause a customer to discontinue use of our products and result in a significant loss of revenue. Finally, customers could choose at any time to stop using our products or could fail to successfully market and sell their products, which could reduce demand for our products, and cause us to hold excess inventory, materially adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations. These risks are exacerbated by the fact that many of our products, and the end products into which our products are incorporated, often have very short life cycles.

We face risks associated with the operation of our manufacturing facility.

We operate a wafer fabrication facility in Canandaigua, NY that we acquired in June 2017. We currently use several international and domestic suppliers to assemble and test our products, as well as our own test and tape and reel facilities located in the U.S.

A number of factors related to our facilities will affect our business and financial results, including the following:

our ability to adjust production capacity in a timely fashion in response to changes in demand for our products;

the significant fixed costs of operating the facilities;

factory utilization rates;

our ability to qualify our facilities for new products and new technologies in a timely manner;

the availability of raw materials, the impact of the volatility of commodity pricing and tariffs imposed on raw materials, including substrates, gold, platinum and high purity source materials such as gallium, aluminum, arsenic, indium, silicon, phosphorous and palladium;

our manufacturing cycle times;

our manufacturing yields;

our ability to hire, train and manage qualified production personnel;

our compliance with applicable environmental and other laws and regulations; and

our ability to avoid prolonged periods of down-time in our facilities for any reason.


We are dependent upon third parties for the supply of raw materials and components.

Our manufacturing operations depend on obtaining adequate supplies of raw materials and components used in our manufacturing processes at a competitive cost, including silicon wafers, copper lead frames, precious and rare earth metals, ceramic packages and various chemicals and gases. Although we maintain relationships with suppliers located around the world with the objective of ensuring that we have adequate sources for the supply of raw materials and components for our manufacturing needs, increases in demand from the semiconductor industry for such raw materials and components, as well as increased demand for commodities in general, can result in tighter supplies and higher costs. Our suppliers may not be able to meet our delivery schedules, we may lose a significant or sole supplier, a supplier may not be able to meet performance and quality specifications and we may not be able to purchase such supplies or material at a competitive cost. If a supplier were unable to meet our delivery schedules or if we lost a supplier or a supplier were unable to meet performance or quality specifications, our ability to satisfy customer obligations would be materially and adversely affected. In addition, we review our relationships with suppliers of raw materials and components for our manufacturing needs on an ongoing basis. In connection with our ongoing review, we may modify or terminate our relationship with one or more suppliers. We may also enter into sole supplier arrangements to meet certain of our raw material or component needs. While we do not typically rely on a single source of supply for our raw materials, we are currently dependent on a limited number of sole-source suppliers. If we were to lose these sole sources of supply, for any reason, a material adverse effect on our business could result until an alternate source is obtained. As certain materials are highly specialized, the lead time needed to identify and qualify a new supplier is typically lengthy and there is often no readily available alternative source. To the extent we enter into additional sole supplier arrangements for any of our raw materials or components, the risks associated with our supply arrangements would be exacerbated.

The ongoing supply shortage experienced by the semiconductor industry has disrupted and will likely continue to disrupt normal business activity, and may have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

The global silicon semiconductor industry is experiencing a shortage in supply and difficulties in ability to meet customer demand. In particular, the government-mandated COVID-19 containment measures in China have impacted supply shipments and created ongoing risk and uncertainty. These issues have led to an increase in lead-times of the production of semiconductor chips and components.

We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, disruption to parts of our semiconductor supply chain, including procuring necessary components and inputs, such as wafers and substrates, in a timely fashion, with suppliers increasing lead times or placing products on allocation and raising prices. We have also incurred higher costs to secure available inventory, or have extended our purchase commitments or placed non-cancellable orders with suppliers, which introduces inventory risk if our forecasts and assumptions are inaccurate. In addition, disruptions to commercial transportation infrastructure have increased delivery times for materials and components to our facilities and, in some cases, our ability to timely ship our products to customers. We have seen some of our customers become more conservative in response to these complications by reducing their purchases and inventories or postponing capital expenditures, including product orders from us.

We believe the global supply chain challenges and their adverse impact on our business will persist and the degree to which the pandemic ultimately impacts our business and results of operations will depend on future developments beyond our control.

Social and environmental responsibility regulations, policies and provisions, as well as customer and investor demands, may make our supply chain more complex and may adversely affect our relationships with customers and investors.

There is an increasing focus on corporate, social and environmental responsibility in the semiconductor industry, particularly with OEMs that manufacture consumer electronics. A number of our customers have adopted, or may adopt, procurement policies that include social and environmental responsibility provisions or requirements that their suppliers should comply with, or they may seek to include such provisions or requirements in their procurement terms and conditions. An increasing number of investors are also requiring companies to disclose corporate, social and environmental policies, practices and metrics. In addition, various jurisdictions are developing climate change-based laws or regulations that could cause us to incur additional direct costs for compliance, as well as indirect costs resulting from our customers, suppliers, or both incurring additional compliance costs that are passed on to us. These legal and regulatory requirements, as well as investor expectations, on corporate environmental and social responsibility practices and disclosure, are subject to change, can be unpredictable, and may be difficult and expensive for us to comply with, given the complexity of our supply chain and our significant outsourced manufacturing. If we are unable to comply, or are unable to cause our suppliers or manufacturers to comply, with such policies or provisions or meet the requirements of our customers and investors, a customer may stop purchasing products from us or an investor may sell their shares, and may take legal action against us, which could harm our reputation, revenue and results of operations.

In recent years, there has been an increased focus from stakeholders, regulators and the public in general on corporate, social and environmental matters, including greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related risks, renewable energy, water stewardship, waste management, diversity, equality and inclusion, responsible sourcing and supply chain, human rights, and social responsibility. We may be unable to satisfactorily meet evolving standards, regulations and disclosure requirements related to corporate, social, and environmental matters. Such matters can affect the willingness or ability of investors to make an investment in our Company, as well as our ability to meet regulatory requirements, including the SEC’s proposed rules related to greenhouse gas emissions. Any failure, or perceived failure, to meet evolving stakeholder expectations, additional regulations and industry standards or achieve our corporate, social, and environmental responsibility goals could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, or stock price.

In addition, as part of their corporate, social and environmental responsibility programs, an increasing number of OEMs are seeking to source products that do not contain minerals sourced from areas where proceeds from the sale of such minerals are likely to be used to fund armed conflicts, such as in the Democratic Republic of Congo. This could adversely affect the sourcing, availability and pricing of minerals used in the manufacture of semiconductor devices, including our products. As a result, we may face difficulties in satisfying these customers’ demands, which may harm our sales and operating results.


The average selling prices of semiconductor products in our markets have often decreased rapidly and may do so in the future, which could harm our revenue and gross profit.

Certain of the semiconductor products we develop and sell are used for high volume applications. As a result, the prices of those products have often decreased rapidly. Gross profit on our products may be negatively affected by, among other things, pricing pressures from our customers. We have reduced, and may in the future reduce, the average selling prices of our products in response to, or in anticipation of, future competitive pricing pressures, new product introductions by us or our competitors and other factors. In addition, some of our customer agreements provide for volume-based pricing and product pricing roadmaps, which can also reduce the average selling prices of our products over time. Our margins and financial results will suffer if we are unable to offset any reductions in our average selling prices by increasing our sales volumes, reducing manufacturing costs, or developing new and higher value-added products on a timely basis.

If we experience poor manufacturing yields, our operating results may suffer.

Our products have unique designs and are fabricated using multiple semiconductor process technologies that are highly complex. In many cases, our products are assembled in customized packages. Many of our products consist of multiple components in a single module and feature enhanced levels of integration and complexity. Our customers insist that our products be designed to meet their exact specifications for quality, performance and reliability. Our manufacturing yield is a combination of yields across the entire supply chain, including wafer fabrication, assembly and test yields. Defects in a single component in an assembled module product can impact the yield for the entire module, which means the adverse economic impacts of an individual defect can be multiplied many times over if we fail to discover the defect before the module is assembled. Due to the complexity of our products, we periodically experience difficulties in achieving acceptable yields and other quality issues, particularly with respect to new products.

Our customers test our products once they have been assembled into their products. The number of usable products that result from our production process can fluctuate as a result of many factors, including:

design errors;

minute impurities and variations in materials used;

contamination of the manufacturing environment;

equipment failure or variations in the manufacturing processes;

losses from broken wafers or other human error; and

defects in substrates and packaging.

We constantly seek to improve our manufacturing yields. Typically, for a given level of sales, when our yields improve, our gross margins improve, and when our yields decrease, our unit costs are higher, our margins are lower, and our operating results are adversely affected.

Costs of product defects and deviations from required specifications could include the following:

writing off inventory;

scrapping products that cannot be fixed;

accepting returns of products that have been shipped;

providing product replacements at no charge;

reimbursement of direct and indirect costs incurred by our customers in recalling or reworking their products due to defects in our products;

travel and personnel costs to investigate potential product quality issues and to identify or confirm the failure mechanism or root cause of product defects; and

defending against litigation.

These costs could be significant and could reduce our gross margins. Our reputation with customers also could be damaged as a result of product defects and quality issues, and product demand could be reduced, which could harm our business and financial results.


Problems in scaling our manufacturing operations could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Future customer demand may require us to significantly increase our manufacturing capacity. There are substantial technical challenges to increasing manufacturing capacity, including equipment acquisition lead times, materials procurement, scaling our manufacturing process, manufacturing site expansion, and the need to significantly increase production yields while maintaining or improving quality control and assurance. Developing commercial-scale manufacturing facilities will require the investment of substantial additional funds and the hiring and retention of additional management, quality assurance, quality control and technical personnel who have the necessary manufacturing experience. The scaling of manufacturing capacity is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties and may lead to variability in product quality or reliability, prolonged construction timelines, as well as resources required to acquire, install and maintain manufacturing equipment, among others, all of which can lead to unexpected delays in manufacturing output. Additionally, the production of our products must occur in a highly controlled and clean environment to minimize particles and other yield- and quality-limiting contaminants. Weaknesses in process control or minute impurities in materials may cause a substantial percentage of defective products. We may not be able to maintain stringent quality controls and contamination problems could arise. Material defects in our products could result in loss or delay of revenues, delayed market acceptance, damage to our reputation, lost customers, legal claims, increased insurance costs or increased service and warranty costs. If we are unable to successfully scale up our manufacturing operations to meet customer demand, our business growth could be materially adversely affected.

Industry overcapacity could cause us to underutilize our manufacturing facilities and have a material adverse effect on our financial performance.

It is difficult to predict future demand for our products, which makes it difficult to estimate future requirements for production capacity and avoid periods of overcapacity. Fluctuations in the growth rate of industry capacity relative to the growth rate in demand for our products also can lead to overcapacity and contribute to cyclicality in the semiconductor market.

Capacity expansion projects have long lead times and require capital commitments based on forecasted product trends and demand well in advance of production orders from customers. In recent years, we have made significant capital investments to expand our RF filter capacity to address forecasted future demand patterns. In certain cases, these capacity additions may exceed the near-term demand requirements, leading to overcapacity situations and underutilization of our manufacturing facilities.

As many of our manufacturing costs are fixed, these costs cannot be reduced in proportion to the reduced revenues experienced during periods of underutilization. Underutilization of our manufacturing facilities can adversely affect our gross margin and other operating results. If demand for our products experiences a prolonged decrease, we may be required to close or idle facilities and write down our long-lived assets or shorten the useful lives of underutilized assets and accelerate depreciation, which would increase our expenses.

We face intense competition, which may cause pricing pressures, decreased gross margins and loss of potential market share and may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

We will compete with U.S. and international semiconductor manufacturers and mobile semiconductor companies of all sizes in terms of resources and market share, some of whom have significantly greater financial, technical, manufacturing and marketing resources than we do. We expect competition in our markets to intensify as new competitors enter the RF component market, existing competitors merge or form alliances, and new technologies emerge. Our competitors may introduce new solutions and technologies that are superior to our BAW technology,products, are verified on a commercial scale, and have achieved widespread market acceptance. Certain of our competitors may be able to adapt more quickly than we can to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements or may be able to devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products than we can. This implementation may require us to modify the manufacturing process for our filters, design new products to more stringent standards, and redesign some existing products, which may prove difficult for us and result in delays in product deliveries and increased expenses.

 


Increased competition could also result in pricing pressures, declining average selling prices for our RF filters,products, decreased gross margins and loss of potential market share. We will need to make substantial investments to develop these enhancements and technologies, and we cannot assure investors that we will have funds available for these investments or that these enhancements and technologies will be successful. If a competing technology emerges that is, or is perceived to be, superior to our existing technology and we are unable to adapt to these changes and to compete effectively, our market share and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected, and our business, revenue, and results of operations could be harmed.

In addition, from time to time, governments may provide subsidies or make other investments that could give competitive advantages to many semiconductor companies. In August 2022, the United States enacted the CHIPS Act, which, among other things, provides funding to increase domestic production and research and development in the semiconductor industry. Our competitors could receive government funding allocated under the CHIPS Act or otherwise benefit from such investments to a greater extent than we do, which could cause them to gain market share and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.


We contract with a number of large service providers and product companies that have considerable bargaining power, which may require us to agree to terms and conditions that could have an adverse effect on our business or ability to recognize revenues.

Large service providers and product companies comprise a significant portion of our current and target customer bases. These customers generally have greater purchasing and bargaining power than smaller entities and, accordingly, often request and receive more favorable terms from suppliers, including us. As we seek to expand our sales to existing customers and acquire new customers, we may be required to agree to terms and conditions that are favorable to our customers and that may affect the timing of our ability to recognize revenue, increase our costs and have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Furthermore, large customers have increased buying power and ability to require onerous terms in our contracts with them, including pricing, warranties, and terms related to indemnification, intellectual property ownership and licensing. If we are unable to satisfy the terms of these contracts, it could result in liabilities of a material nature, including litigation, damages, additional costs, loss of market share, loss of intellectual property rights or exclusive use of such rights, and loss of reputation. Additionally, the terms these large customers may require, such as most-favored customer or exclusivity provisions with respect to specific products, may impact our ability to do business with other customers and generate revenues from such customers.

We may be subject to risks related to doing business in, and having counterparties based in, foreign countries.

We engage in operations, and enter into agreements with counterparties, located outside the U.S., which exposes us to political, governmental and economic instability and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.

Any disruption caused by these factors could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and prospects. Risks associated with potential operations, commitments and investments outside of the U.S. include but are not limited to risks of:

global and local economic, social and political conditions and uncertainty, including heightened tensions between the U.S. and China, China and Taiwan, or other countries;

currency exchange restrictions and currency fluctuations;

war, including the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, or terrorist attack;

local outbreak of disease, such as COVID-19;

renegotiation or nullification of existing contracts or international trade arrangements;

labor market conditions and workers’ rights affecting our manufacturing operations or those of our customers;

macro-economic conditions impacting key markets and sources of supply;

changing laws and policies affecting trade, taxation, financial regulation, immigration, and investment;

compliance with laws and regulations that differ among jurisdictions, including those covering taxes, intellectual property ownership and infringement, imports and exports, anti-corruption and anti-bribery, antitrust and competition, data privacy, and environment, health, and safety; and

general hazards associated with the assertion of sovereignty over areas in which operations are conducted, transactions occur, or counterparties are located.

As our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, any operations conducted outside the U.S. or transactions denominated in foreign currencies would face additional risks of fluctuating currency values and exchange rates, hard currency shortages and controls on currency exchange. In addition, we would be subject to the impact of foreign currency fluctuations and exchange rate changes on our financial reports when translating our assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses from operations or transactions outside of the U.S. into U.S. dollars at the then-applicable exchange rates. These translations could result in changes to our results of operations from period to period.

RFMi relies on third parties outside the U.S., including in Taiwan, for its development and manufacturing activities.

 

Our subsidiary, RFMi, depends on contractors for certain of its manufacturing and research and development activities. Specifically, RFMi’s contract manufacturer, TST, produces the majority of products sold by RFMi. TST ships some products to RFMi for distribution to end customers and, in some cases, ships products directly to those customers. TST is located in Taiwan and therefore geopolitical changes in China-Taiwan relations could disrupt its operations, which would adversely affect RFMi’s ability to manufacture certain products. In addition, we have leased office space and have operations in Taiwan. Accordingly, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be affected by changes in governmental and economic policies in Taiwan, social instability and diplomatic and social developments in or affecting Taiwan due to its unique international political status. We cannot assure that relations between Taiwan and China will not face political, military or economic uncertainties in the future. Any deterioration in the relations between Taiwan and China, and other factors affecting military, political or economic conditions in Taiwan, could disrupt RFMi’s and our business operations and materially and adversely affect our results of operations.


Economic regulation in China could adversely impact our business and results of operations.

A significant portion of our potential customer base is in China. For many years, the Chinese economy has experienced periods of rapid growth and wide fluctuations in the rate of inflation. In response to these factors, the Chinese government has, from time to time, adopted measures to regulate growth and to contain inflation, including currency controls and measures designed to restrict credit, control prices or set currency exchange rates. Such actions in the future, as well as other changes in Chinese laws and regulations, including actions in furtherance of China’s stated policy of reducing its dependence on foreign semiconductor manufacturers as well as China’s data localization policies and measures, could increase the cost of doing business in China, foster the emergence of Chinese-based competitors, decrease the demand for our products in China, or reduce the supply of critical materials for our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Changes in government trade and investment policies, including the imposition of tariffs, export restrictions, sanctions, transaction restrictions, or retaliatory measures could limit our ability to sell our products to certain customers, which may materially adversely affect our sales and results of operations.

The U.S. or foreign governments may take administrative, legislative or regulatory action that could materially interfere with our ability to sell products in certain countries, particularly Russia and in China. For example, beginning in May 2018, the U.S. imposed tariffs, ranging from 7.5% to 25% on approximately two-thirds of U.S. imports from China, including certain electronic components and equipment. China has taken retaliatory actions, including imposing tariffs on certain U.S. exports effective September, 2019. While the imposition of these tariffs did not have a direct, material adverse impact on our business during fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, the direct and indirect effects of tariffs and other restrictive trade policies are difficult to measure and are only one part of a larger U.S./China economic and trade policy friction.

For example, U.S. government actions targeting exports of certain technologies to and from China are becoming more pervasive. In 2018, the U.S. adopted new laws designed to address concerns about the export of emerging and foundational technologies to China. In 2021, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued regulations implementing former President Trump’s executive order invoking national emergency economic powers to implement a framework to regulate the acquisition or transfer of information communications technology in transactions that imposed undue national security risks. In addition, the U.S. Department of Commerce enacted new rules that expanded export license requirements for U.S. companies to sell certain items to companies and other end-users in China that are designated as military end-users or have operations that could support military end uses; has added additional Chinese companies to its restricted entity list and unverified list under suspicion of military-civil fusion, support of Russia, or other factors associated with a broadening scope of national security concerns; and has expanded an existing rule (referred to as the foreign direct product rule) in a manner that could cause foreign-made wafers, chipsets, and certain related items to be subject to U.S. licensing requirements if certain Chinese corporations or their affiliates are parties to a transaction involving the items.

In response to these and other U.S. actions, China could determine to take or appear to have taken countermeasures against U.S. companies doing business in or with China. These series of actions and other types of countermeasures could lead to additional restrictions on the export of products that include or enable certain technologies, including products we could potentially provide to China-based customers. More recently in August 2023, President Biden issued an executive order that provides for the establishment of a new outbound investment program to block and regulate investment in China in sensitive technologies. In addition, the Biden administration has and likely will continue to take action under U.S. export control laws to restrict transfer of goods, technology, information, and the provision of services that could harm U.S. national security.

Furthermore, the imposition of tariffs on our potential customers’ products that are imported from China to the U.S. could harm sales of such products, which could indirectly harm our business. We cannot predict what actions may ultimately be taken with respect to tariffs, export controls, countermeasures, or other trade measures between the U.S. and China or other countries, what products may be subject to such actions, or what actions may be taken by the other countries in retaliation.

The loss or temporary loss of potential foreign customers or the imposition of restrictions on our ability to sell products to such customers as a result of tariffs, export restrictions, sanctions or other U.S. executive or regulatory actions could materially adversely affect our sales, business and results of operations.


We depend on a few large customers for a substantial portion of our revenue.

A substantial portion of our revenue comes from large purchases by a small number of customers. Our future operating results depend on both the success of our largest customers and on our success in diversifying our products and customer base.

The concentration of our revenue with a relatively small number of customers makes us particularly dependent on factors, both positive and negative, affecting those customers. If demand for their devices incorporating our products increases, our results are favorably impacted, while if demand for their devices decreases, they may reduce their purchases of, or stop purchasing, our products and our operating results would suffer. Even if we achieve a design win, our customers can delay, temporarily suspend, or cancel the manufacture or release of a new device for any reason, such as a shortage of supply of other components needed to manufacture their device. Most of our customers can cease incorporating our products into their devices with little notice to us and with little or no penalty. The loss of a large customer and failure to add new customers to replace lost revenue would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Global shortages in manufacturing capacities could negatively affect our operations and negatively impact our results of operations.

Our business depends in significant part upon manufacturers of products requiring semiconductors, as well as the current and anticipated production of these products. As a supplier to such manufacturers, we are subject to the business cycles that characterize the industry. Recent sharp increases in demand for semiconductor products have resulted in a global shortage of manufacturing capacities and it is unclear how long this shortage may last. If our customers are forced to reduce the amount of their products they manufacture or plan to manufacture due to a limited supply of semiconductors, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected.

Changes in general economic conditions, together with other factors, cause significant upturns and downturns in the industry, and our business, therefore, may also experience cyclical fluctuations in the future.

 

From time to time, changes in general economic conditions, together with other factors, may cause significant upturns and downturns in the semiconductor industry. These fluctuations are due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

 

 levels of inventory in our end markets,

 availability and cost of supply for manufacturing of our RF filters using our design,
products,

 changes in end-user demand for the products manufactured with our technology and sold by our prospective customers,

 exposure to foreign currency exchange rates, import duties and tariffs,

inflation or a tightening of the credit markets

industry production capacity levels and fluctuations in industry manufacturing yields,

 market acceptance of our current and future customers’ products that incorporate our RF filters,

 the gain or loss of significant customers,

 the effects of competitive pricing pressures, including decreases in average selling prices of our RF filters,
products,

 new product and technology introductions by competitors,

 changes in the mix of products produced and sold, and

 intellectual property disputes.

 


As a result, the demand for our products can change quickly and in ways we may not anticipate, and our business, therefore, may also experience cyclical fluctuations in future operating results. In addition, future downturns in the electronic systems industry could adversely impact our revenue and harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Macroeconomic weakness and uncertainty also make it more difficult for us to accurately forecast revenue, gross margin and expenses, and may make it more difficult to raise or refinance debt. For example, an escalation of trade tensions between the U.S. and China has resulted in trade restrictions and increased tariffs that harm our ability to participate in Chinese markets or compete effectively with Chinese companies. Sustained uncertainty about, or worsening of, current global economic conditions and further escalation of trade tensions between the U.S. and its trading partners, especially China, and possible decoupling of the U.S. and China economies, could result in a global economic slowdown and long-term changes to global trade.

 

If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel to contribute to the development, manufacture and sale of our products, we may not be able to effectively operate our business.

 

As the source of our technological and product innovations, our key technical personnel represent a significant asset. We believe that our future success is highly dependent on the continued services of our current key officers, employees, and Board members, as well as our ability to attract and retain highly skilled and experienced technical personnel. The loss of their services could have a detrimental effect on our operations. Specifically, the loss of the services of Jeffrey Shealy, our President and Chief Executive Officer, John Kurtzweil, our Chief Financial Officer, David Aichele,or our Executive Vice President of Business Development, Richard Ogawa, our Special Legal Advisor, any major changechanges in our Board or other senior management, or our inability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our business. The competition for management and technical personnel is intense in the wireless semiconductor industry, and therefore, we cannot assure you that we will be able to attract and retain qualified management and other personnel necessary for the design, development, manufacture and sale of our products.

 


Product defects could adversely affect the results of our operations and may expose us to product liability claims.

The fabrication of RF filters is a complex and precise process. If we or any of our manufacturers fails to successfully manufacture wafers that conform to our design specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FCC, it may result in substantial risk of undetected flaws in components or other materials used by our manufacturers during fabrication of our filters and could lead to product defects and costs to repair or replace these parts or materials. Any such failure would significantly impact our ability to develop and implement our technology and to improve performance of our RF filters. Our inability to comply with such requirements could result in significant costs, as well as negative publicity and damage to our reputation that could reduce demand for our products.

We also could be subject to product liability lawsuits if the wireless devices containing our RF filters cause injury. Recently interest groups have requested that the FCC investigate claims that wireless communications technologies pose health concerns and cause interference with airbags, hearing aids and medical devices. Any such product liability claims may include allegations of defects in manufacturing, defects in design, a failure to warn of dangers inherent in the product or inadequate disclosure of risks related to the use of our product, negligence, strict liability and a breach of warranties. Claims could also be asserted under state consumer protection acts.

If we are unable to establish effective marketing and sales capabilities or enter into additional agreements with third parties to market and sell our RF filters,products, we may not be able to effectively generate and sustain or increase product revenues.

 

We have limited experience selling, marketing or distributing products and currently have a small internal marketing and sales force. In order toTo progress the launch and commercializecommercialization of our technology and our RF filters,products, we must build on a territory-by-territory basis marketing, sales, distribution, managerial and other non-technical capabilities or make arrangements with third parties to perform these services, and we may not be successful in doing so. Therefore, we may choose to collaborate, either globally or on a territory-by-territory basis, with third parties that have direct sales forces and established distribution systems, either to augment our own sales force and distribution systems or in lieu of our own sales force and distribution systems. If so, our success will depend, in part, on our ability to enter into and maintain collaborative relationships for such capabilities, such collaborator’s strategic interest in the products under development and such collaborator’s ability to successfully market and sell any such products.

 

If we are unable to enter into such arrangements when needed on acceptable terms or at all, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our filters.products. Further, to the extent that we depend on third parties for marketing and distribution, any revenues we receive will depend upon the efforts of such third parties, and there can be no assurance that such efforts will be successful. If we decide in the future to establish an internal sales and marketing team with technical expertise and supporting distribution capabilities to commercialize our RF filters,products, it could be expensive and time consuming and would require significant attention of our executive officers to manage. We may also not have sufficient resources to allocate to the sales and marketing of our filters.products. Any failure or delay in the development of sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, either through collaboration with one or more third parties or through internal efforts, would adversely impact the commercialization of any of our products that we obtain approval to market. As a result, our future product revenue would suffer, and we may incur significant additional losses.

 


We may engage in future acquisitions that could disrupt our business, cause dilution to our shareholders and harm our financial condition and operating results.

We have in the past acquired other businesses and may, in the future, make acquisitions of, or investments in, companies that we believe have products or capabilities that are a strategic or commercial fit with our current business or otherwise offer opportunities for our company. In connection with these acquisitions or investments, we may:

issue Common Stock or other forms of equity that would dilute our existing shareholders’ percentage of ownership,

incur debt and assume liabilities, and

incur amortization expenses related to intangible assets or incur large and immediate write-offs.

We may not be able to complete acquisitions on favorable terms, if at all. If we do complete an acquisition, we cannot assure you that it will ultimately strengthen our competitive position or that it will be viewed positively by customers, financial markets or investors. Furthermore, future acquisitions could pose numerous additional risks to our expected operations, including:

problems integrating the purchased business, products or technologies,

challenges in achieving strategic objectives, cost savings and other anticipated benefits,

increases to our expenses,

the assumption of significant liabilities that exceed the limitations of any applicable indemnification provisions or the financial resources of any indemnifying party,
inability to maintain relationships with prospective key customers, vendors and other business partners of the acquired businesses,

diversion of management’s attention from its day-to-day responsibilities,

difficulty in maintaining controls, procedures and policies during the transition and integration,

entrance into marketplaces where we have no or limited prior experience and where competitors have stronger marketplace positions,

potential loss of key employees, particularly those of the acquired entity, and

historical financial information may not be representative or indicative of our results as a combined company.

Unsolicited takeover proposals, governance change proposals, proxy contests and certain proposals/actions by activist investors may create additional risks and uncertainties with respect to our financial position, operations, strategies and management, and may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain key employees. Any perceived uncertainties may affect the market price and volatility of our securities.

Public companies in the technology industry have been the target of unsolicited takeover proposals in the past. In the event that a third party, such as a competitor, private equity firm or activist investor makes an unsolicited takeover proposal, or proposes to change our governance policies or board of directors, or makes other proposals concerning our ownership structure or operations, our review and consideration of such proposals may be a significant distraction for our management and employees, and may require us to expend significant time and resources. Such proposals may create uncertainty for our employees, additional risks and uncertainties with respect to our financial position, operations, strategies and management, and may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain key employees. Any perceived uncertainties as to our future direction also may affect the market price and volatility of our securities.


Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

 

If we fail to obtain, maintain and enforce our intellectual property rights, we may not be able to prevent third parties from using our proprietary technologies.

 

Our long-term success largely depends on our ability to market technologically competitive products which, in turn, largely depends on our ability to obtain and maintain adequate intellectual property protection and to enforce our proprietary rights without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties. While we rely upon a combination of our patent applications currently pending with the United StateStates Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), our trademarks, copyrights, trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect the intellectual property related to our technologies, there can be no assurance thatthat:

 


 our currently pending or future patent applications will result in issued patents,

 our limited patent portfolio will provide adequate protection to our core technology,

 we will succeed in protecting our technology adequately in all key jurisdictions, or

 we will be able to finalize negotiations to enter into agreements pursuant to which we will license certain patents, or

we can prevent third parties from disclosure or misappropriation of our proprietary information which could enable competitors to quickly duplicate or surpass our technological achievements, thus eroding any competitive advantage we may derive from the proprietary information.

 

In addition, we intend to expand our international presence, and effective patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret protection may not be available or may be limited in foreign countries.

 

We have a limited number of patent applications, which may not result in issued patents or patents that fully protect our intellectual property.

 

In the United States and internationally we have sixteen (16) pending patent applications;had 108 applications as of August 25, 2023; however, there is no assurance that any of the pending applications or our future patent applications will result in patents being issued, or that any patents that may be issued as a result of existing or future applications will provide meaningful protection or commercial advantage to us.

 

The process of seeking patent protection in the United States and abroad can be long and expensive. Since patent applications in the United States and most other countries are confidential for a period of time after filing, we cannot be certain at the time of filing that we are the first to file any patent application related to our single-crystal acoustic wave filter technology. In addition, patent applications are often published as part of the patent application process, even if such applications do not issue as patents. When published, such applications will become publicly available, and proprietary information disclosed in the application will become available to others. While at present we are unaware of competing patent applications, competing applications could potentially surface.

 

Even if all of our pending patent applications are granted and result in registration of our patents, we cannot predict the breadth of claims that may be allowed or enforced, or that the scope of any patent rights could provide a sufficient degree of protection that could permit us to gain or keep our competitive advantage with respect to these products and technologies. For example, we cannot predict:

 

 the degree and range of protection any patents will afford us against competitors, including whether third parties will find ways to make, use, sell, offer to sell or import competitive products without infringing our patents;

 if and when patents will be issued;

 if third parties will obtain patents claiming inventions similar to those covered by our patents and patent applications;


 if third parties have blocking patents that could be used to prevent us from marketing our own patented products and practicing our own technology; or

 whether we will need to initiate litigation or administrative proceedings (e.g., at the USPTO) in connection with patent rights, which may be costly whether we win or lose.

 

As a result, the patent applications we own may fail to result in issued patents in the United States. Third parties may challenge the validity, enforceability or scope of any issued patents or patents issued to us in the future, which may result in those patents being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable. Even if they are unchallenged, our patents and patent applications may not adequately protect our intellectual property or prevent others from developing similar products that do not infringe the claims made in our patents. If the breadth or strength of protection provided by the patents we hold or pursue is threatened, we may not be able to prevent others from offering similar technology and products in the RFFE mobile market and our ability to commercialize our RF filters with technology protected by those patents could be threatened.

 


If we fail to obtain issued patents outside of the United States, our ability to prevent misappropriation of our proprietary information or infringement of our intellectual property rights in countries outside of the United States where our filters may be sold in the future may be significantly limited. If we file foreign patent applications related to our pending U.S. patent applications or to our issued patents in the United States, these applications may be contested and fail to result in issued patents outside of the United States or we may be required to narrow our claims. Even if some or all of our patent applications are granted outside of the United States and result in issued patents, effective enforcement of rights granted by these patents in some countries may not be available due to the differences in foreign patent and other laws concerning intellectual property rights, a relatively weak legal regime protecting intellectual property rights in these countries, and because it is difficult, expensive and time-consuming to police unauthorized use of our intellectual property when infringers are overseas. This failure to obtain or maintain adequate protection of our intellectual property rights outside of the United States could have a materially adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial conditions.

 

We are, and may in the future be, involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents, which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful.

 

Competitors may infringe our patents or the patents of our potential licensors. To attempt to stop infringement or unauthorized use, we may need to file infringement claims from time to time, which can be expensive and time consuming and distract management.

 

If we pursue any infringement proceeding, a court may decide that a patent of ours or one of our licensors is not valid or is unenforceable or may refuse to stop the other party from using the relevant technology on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in question. Additionally, any enforcement of our patents may provoke third parties to assert counterclaims against us. Some of our current and potential competitors have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to enforcing their intellectual property rights than we have. Moreover, the legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents, which could reduce the likelihood of success of, or the amount of damages that could be awarded resulting from, any infringement proceeding we pursue in any such jurisdiction. An adverse result in any infringement litigation or defense proceedings could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated, held unenforceable, or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing, which could limit the ability of our filters to compete in those jurisdictions.

 

Interference proceedings could be provoked by third parties or brought by the USPTO to determine the priority of inventions with respect to our patents or patent applications. An unfavorable outcome could require us to cease using the related technology or to attempt to license rights to use it from the prevailing party. Our business could be harmed if the prevailing party does not offer us a license on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

 

We need to protect our trademark rights and disclosure of our trade secrets to prevent competitors from taking advantage of our goodwill.

 

We believe that the protection of our trademark rights is an important factor in product recognition, protecting our brand, maintaining goodwill, and maintaining or increasing market share. We currently have nineteen registered domestic and international trademarks and two trademarks that we have filed to register withpending domestic trademark applications including the USPTO — the Akoustismarks AKOUSTIS, XBAW, and BulkONE® marks —RFMi in multiple forms and weinternational classes. We may expend substantial cost and effort in an attempt to register new trademarks and maintain and enforce our trademark rights. If we do not adequately protect our rights in our trademarks from infringement, any goodwill that we have developed in those trademarks could be lost or impaired.

 


Third parties may claim that the sale or promotion of our products, when and if we have any, may infringe on the trademark rights of others. Trademark infringement problems occur frequently in connection with the sale and marketing of products in the RFFE mobile industry. If we become involved in any dispute regarding our trademark rights, regardless of whether we prevail, we could be required to engage in costly, distracting and time-consuming litigation that could harm our business. If the trademarks we use are found to infringe upon the trademark of another company, we could be liable for damages and be forced to stop using those trademarks, and as result, we could lose all the goodwill that has been developed in those trademarks.

 


In addition to the protection afforded by patents and trademarks, we seek to rely on copyright, trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect proprietary know-how that is not patentable, processes for which patents are difficult to enforce and any other elements of our processes that involve proprietary know-how, information or technology that is not covered by patents. For Akoustis, this includes chip layouts, circuit designs, resonator layouts and implementation, and membrane definition.MEMS resonator device engineering. Although we require all of our employees and certain consultants and advisors to assign inventions to us, and all of our employees, consultants, advisors and any third parties who have access to our proprietary know-how, information or technology to enter into confidentiality agreements, our trade secrets and other proprietary information may be disclosed, or competitors may otherwise gain access to such information or independently develop substantially equivalent information. If we are unable to prevent material disclosure of the intellectual property related to our technologies to third parties, we will not be able to establish or maintain the competitive advantage that we believe is provided by such intellectual property, which would weaken our competitive market position, and materially adversely affect our business and operational results.

 

Development of certain technologies with our manufacturers and other suppliers may result in restrictions on jointly-developed intellectual property.

 

In order to maintain and expand our strategic relationship with manufacturers of our filters and other suppliers, we may, from time to time, develop certain technologies jointly with these manufacturers and other suppliers and file for further intellectual property protection and/or seek to commercialize such technologies. We may enter into joint development agreements with manufacturers and other suppliers to provide for joint development works and joint intellectual property rights by us and by such manufacturer.manufacturer or supplier. Such agreements may restrict our commercial use of such intellectual property, or may require written consent from, or a separate agreement with, that manufacturer.manufacturer or supplier. In other cases, we may not have any rights to use intellectual property solely developed and owned by such manufacturer, supplier, or another third party. If we cannot obtain commercial use rights for such jointly-owned intellectual property or intellectual property solely owned by these manufacturers or suppliers, our future product development and commercialization plans may be adversely affected.

 

We are, and may bebecome, subject to claims of infringement, misappropriation or misuse of third party intellectual property that, regardless of merit, could result in significant expense and loss of our intellectual property rights.

 

The semiconductor industry is characterized by the vigorous pursuit and protection of intellectual property rights. We have not undertaken a comprehensive review of the rights of third parties in our field. From time to time, we may be named in lawsuits or receive notices or inquiries from third parties regarding our products or the manner in which we conduct our business suggesting that we may be infringing, misappropriating or otherwise misusing patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret and other intellectual property rights. Any claims that our technology infringes, misappropriates or otherwise misuses the rights of third parties, regardless of their merit or resolution, could be expensive to litigate or settle and could divert the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel, cause significant delays and materially disrupt the conduct of our business. We may not prevail in such proceedings given the complex technical issues and inherent uncertainties in intellectual property litigation. If such proceedings result in an adverse outcome, we could be required to:

 

 pay substantial damages, including treble damages if we were held to have willfully infringed;

 cease the manufacture, offering for sale or sale of the infringing technology or processes;

 expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology or processes;

 obtain a license from a third party, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or may not be available at all; or

 lose the opportunity to license our technology to others or to collect royalty payments based upon successful protection and assertion of our intellectual property against others.

 


On October 4, 2021, the Company was named as a defendant in a complaint filed by Qorvo, Inc. (“Qorvo”) in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware alleging, among other things, patent infringement, false advertising, false patent marking, and unfair competition. The complaint alleges that the defendants misappropriated proprietary information, made misleading statements about the characteristics of certain of its products, and sold products infringing on certain of the plaintiff’s patents. The plaintiff seeks an injunction enjoining the Company from the alleged infringement and damages, including punitive and statutory enhanced damages, in an unspecified amount. The Company filed a motion to dismiss all of the claims other than the direct patent infringement claims, but the court permitted the plaintiff to file an amended complaint which the court subsequently determined was sufficient for pleading purposes. The Court denied the Company’s motion in May 2022. The Court held a claims construction hearing in November 2022, issuing its claim construction order on March 15, 2023. On February 8, 2023, Qorvo filed a second amended complaint adding allegations of misappropriation of trade secrets, racketeering activities, and civil conspiracy. The Company continues to develop its defenses and mitigation strategies, and intends to proceed in defending itself vigorously against the claims asserted by Qorvo. However, the Company can provide no assurance as to the outcome of such dispute, and such action may result in judgments against the Company for an injunction, significant damages or other relief, such as future royalty payments to Qorvo or restrictions on certain of the Company’s activities.

On April 20, 2023, the Company filed a complaint against Qorvo in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement by Qorvo of a patent licensed exclusively to the Company by Cornell University. The complaint alleges Qorvo’s willful infringement of the Cornell patent and seeks remedies including enhanced damages and attorneys’ fees. On July 24, 2023, Qorvo filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On August 11, 2023, Qorvo filed a motion to strike Akoustis’ infringement contentions. The Company intends to vigorously pursue its claims against Qorvo but can provide no assurance as to the outcome of this dispute.

Resolution of each of the matters described above may be prolonged and costly, and the ultimate result or judgment is uncertain due to the inherent uncertainty in litigation and other proceedings. An adverse result in the matters described above would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. Even if ultimately settled or resolved in the Company’s favor, the matters described above and other possible future actions may result in significant expenses, diversion of management and technical personnel attention and disruptions and delays in the Company’s business and product development, and other collateral consequences, all of which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, and results of operations. Any out-of-court settlement of the above matters or other actions may also have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations, including, but not limited to, substantial expenses, the payment of royalties, licensing or other fees payable to third parties, or restrictions on its ability to develop, manufacture, and sell its products.

From time to time, the Company may become involved in other lawsuits, investigations, and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses against such other pending claims and intends to vigorously pursue them. While it is not possible to predict or determine the outcomes of any such other pending actions, the Company believes the amount of liability, if any, with respect to such other pending actions, would not materially affect its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In addition, our agreements with prospective customers and manufacturing partners may require us to indemnify such customers and manufacturing partners for third party intellectual property infringement claims. Pursuant to such agreements, we may be required to defend such customers and manufacturing partners against certain claims that could cause us to incur additional costs. While we endeavor to include as part of such indemnification obligations a provision permitting us to assume the defense of any indemnification claim, not all of our current agreements contain such a provision and we cannot provide any assurance that our future agreements will contain such a provision, which could result in increased exposure to us in the case of an indemnification claim.

 

Defense of any intellectual property infringement claims against us, regardless of their merit, would involve substantial litigation expense and would be a significant diversion of resources from our business. In the event of a successful claim of infringement against us, we may have to pay substantial damages, obtain one or more licenses from third parties, limit our business to avoid the infringing activities, pay royalties and/or redesign our infringing technology or alter related formulations, processes, methods or other technologies, any or all of which may be impossible or require substantial time and monetary expenditure. The occurrence of any of the above events could prevent us from continuing to develop and commercialize our filters and our business could materially suffer.

Risks Related to our Financial Condition

 

We have a history of losses, will need substantial additional funding to continue our operations and may not achieve or sustain profitability in the future.

 

Our operations have consumed substantial amounts of cash since inception. We haveOur filter business has incurred losses since our incorporation and formationits inception in May 2014. Although our newly acquired STC-MEMS Business has a potential revenue stream estimation of $1.5 million in the current fiscal year, (which are not guaranteed), and although we plan to apply for additional grants in the calendar years 2017 and 2018, we do not expect meaningful revenues from our resonator technology until at least the first half of the calendar year 2018. There is no guarantee that the grants we apply for will be awarded to us, and if our forecasts for the Company prove incorrect, the business, operating results and financial condition of the Company will be materially and adversely affected. We anticipate that our operating expenses will increase in the foreseeable future as we continue to pursue the development of our patent-pending single-crystal acoustic wave filterhigh purity piezoelectric materials technology, invest in marketing, sales and distribution of our RF filtersproducts to grow our business, acquire customers, commercialize our technology in the mobile wireless market and continue the transition ofto invest in our manufacturing to our STC-MEMS Business.facility in Canandaigua, NY. These efforts may prove more expensive than we currently anticipate, and we may not succeed in generating sufficient revenues to offset these higher expenses. In addition, we expect to incur significant expenses related to regulatory requirements and our ability to obtain, protect, and defend our intellectual property rights.

 

We may also encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown factors that may increase our capital needs and/or cause us to spend our cash resources faster than we expect. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in order to continue our operations.

 

To date, we have financed our operations through a mix of investments from private investors, the incurrencepublic offerings of equity and debt securities, foundry services revenue, RF filter revenue, and grant funding, and we expect to continue to utilize such means of financing for the foreseeable future. Additional funding from those or other sources may not be available when or in the amounts needed, on acceptable terms, or at all. If we raise additional capital through the sale of equity, or securities convertible into equity, it would result in dilution to our then existing stockholders, which could be significant depending on the price at which we may be able to sell our securities.securities and the amount of securities we issue. If we raise additional capital through the incurrence of indebtedness, we would likelymay become subject to covenants restricting our business activities, and holders of debt instruments may have rights and privileges senior to those of our equity investors. In addition, servicing the interest and principal repayment obligations under debt facilities could divert funds that would otherwise be available to support research and development, or commercialization activities. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate the production and sale of our RF filter products, our R&D programs for our acoustic wave filter technology or any future commercialization efforts. Any of these events could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and prospects, and could cause our business to fail.

 


Our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed doubt aboutServicing our debt requires a significant amount of cash or Common Stock, and we may not have sufficient cash flow from our business or have the ability to continue as a going concern.issue the necessary number of shares of Common Stock to pay our substantial debt.

The Company’s historical financial statements have been prepared underPursuant to the assumption thatconvertible note offering we will continue as a going concern. Our independent registered public accounting firm hascompleted in June 2022, we incurred $44.0 million of indebtedness and we issued a report that included an explanatory paragraph referring to$4.0 million promissory note in connection with our recurring net losses and accumulated deficit and expressing substantial doubtacquisition of GDSI. This level of debt could have significant consequences on future operations, including:

increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions;

making it more difficult for us to meet our payment and other obligations;

making it more difficult to obtain any necessary future financing for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements or other purposes;

requiring the dedication of a substantial portion of any cash flow from operations to service our indebtedness, thereby reducing the amount of cash flow available for other purposes, including capital expenditures;

placing us at a possible competitive disadvantage with competitors that are less leveraged than us or have better access to capital than we have; and

limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the markets in which we compete.

Accrued interest on our 6.0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2027 is payable semi-annually in our ability to continue as a going concern.cash or freely tradable shares of Common Stock. Our ability to continue as a going concernmake scheduled payments of interest depends on our future performance, which is dependent uponsubject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our abilitycontrol. Our business may not generate cash flow from operations in the future sufficient to obtain additional equity financing or otherservice our debt in cash and make necessary capital attain further operating efficiencies, reduce expenditures, and, ultimately, to generate revenue. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. However, if adequate funds are not available to us when we need them, andexpenditures.

If we are unable to commercializegenerate sufficient cash flow to satisfy payment obligations under our products giving us access to additional cash resources,convertible notes, we willmay be required to curtail our operations, which would, in turn, further raise substantial doubt about our ability to continueadopt one or more alternatives, such as a going concern.

Risk Related to Managing Any Growth We May Experience

Weselling assets or obtaining additional equity capital on terms that may engage in future acquisitions that could disrupt our business, cause dilution to our shareholders and harm our financial condition and operating results.

While we currently have no specific plans to acquire any other businesses, we may, in the future, make acquisitions of,be onerous or investments in, companies that we believe have products or capabilities that are a strategic or commercial fit with our current business or otherwise offer opportunities for our company. In connection with these acquisitions or investments, we may:

issue Common Stock or other forms of equity that would dilute our existing shareholders’ percentage of ownership,
incur debt and assume liabilities, and
incur amortization expenses related to intangible assets or incur large and immediate write-offs.

highly dilutive. We may not be able to complete acquisitionsengage in any of these activities or engage in these activities on favorabledesirable terms, if at all. If we do complete an acquisition, we cannot assure you that it will ultimately strengthen our competitive position or that it will be viewed positively by customers, financial markets or investors. Furthermore, future acquisitions could pose numerous additional risks to our expected operations, including:

problems integrating the purchased business, products or technologies,
challenges in achieving strategic objectives, cost savings and other anticipated benefits,
increases to our expenses,
the assumption of significant liabilities that exceed the limitations of any applicable indemnification provisions or the financial resources of any indemnifying party,
inability to maintain relationships with prospective key customers, vendors and other business partners of the acquired businesses,
diversion of management’s attention from its day-to-day responsibilities,

difficulty in maintaining controls, procedures and policies during the transition and integration,
entrance into marketplaces where we have no or limited prior experience and where competitors have stronger marketplace positions,
potential loss of key employees, particularly those of the acquired entity, and
historical financial information may not be representative or indicative of our results as a combined company.

Our business and operations would suffer in the event of system failures, and our operations are vulnerable to interruption by natural disasters, terrorist activity, power loss and other events beyond our control, the occurrence of which could materially harm our business.

Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems and those of our contractors and consultants are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, unauthorized access as well as telecommunication and electrical failures. While we have not experienced any such system failure, accident or security breach to date, if such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, it could result in a materialdefault on our debt obligations. If we determine to pay the interest in shares of Common Stock, it could materially dilute our current stockholders.

Our ability to raise capital may be materially adversely impacted by economic and geopolitical uncertainties.

A sustained disruption ofin the capital markets from economic and geopolitical uncertainties such as the COVID-19 pandemic, bank failures, inflation, recession, or higher interest rates could negatively impact our R&D. If any disruption or security breach resulted in a loss of or damageability to our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability and/orraise capital. In the further development of our technology for RF filters could be delayed.

We are also vulnerable to accidents, electrical blackouts, labor strikes, terrorist activities, war and other natural disasters and other events beyond our control, andpast, we have not undertaken a systematic analysisfinanced our operations primarily by the issuance of equity and debt securities. However, we cannot predict if such economic and geopolitical uncertainties will impact the potential consequencescapital markets or if we will be able to raise additional funds on terms acceptable to us. Such macro-economic disruptions may disrupt our ability to raise additional capital to finance our operations in the future, which could materially and adversely affect our business, as a result of any such eventsfinancial condition and do not have an applicable recovery plan in place. We currently do not carry other business interruption insurance that would compensate us for actual losses from interruptions of our business that may occur,prospects, and any losses or damages incurred by us could ultimately cause our business to materially suffer.fail.


Risks Related to Regulatory Requirements

Government regulation may adversely affect our business.

 

The effects of regulation may materially and adversely impact our business. For example, regulatory policies of the FCC relating to radio frequency emissions, consumer protection laws of the FTC, product safety regulatory activities of the Consumer Products Safety Commission, the import/export regulatory activities of the Department of Commerce, international traffic in arms regulations (ITAR) administered by the Department of State, and environmental regulatory activities of the EPA could impede sales of our products in the United States. We and our customers are also subject to various import and export laws and regulations. If we fail to continue to comply with these regulations, we may be unable to successfully integratemanufacture the STC-MEMS Business with our current operationsaffected products or ship these products to certain customers and strategic business plan.

We will be requiredsubject to devote significant management attentioninvestigations, sanctions, mandatory product recalls, enforcement actions, disgorgement of profits, fines, damages, civil and resources, including expenses to integratingcriminal penalties, or injunctions. Additionally, these rules and regulations may in the STC-MEMS Business with our current operations and to developing the integrated operations in accordance with our strategic business plan. There is no guaranteefuture be expanded such that we will maintain existing customer/other relationships or the revenue stream of the STC-MEMS Business. We may fail to realize some or all of the anticipated benefits of the acquisition of the STC-MEMS Business if the integration and development process takes longer than expected or is costlier than expected.  Such failurethey may have a material adversegreater effect on our stock price, business plan of operation,than they do currently.

As described above under the risk factor entitled “We may be subject to risks related to doing business in, and having counterparties based in, foreign countries,” our business is also increasingly subject to complex foreign and U.S. laws and regulations, including but not limited to, anti-corruption laws, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and equivalent laws in other jurisdictions, antitrust or competition laws, and data privacy laws, among others. Foreign governments may also impose tariffs, duties and other import restrictions on components that we obtain from non-domestic suppliers and may impose export restrictions on products that we sell internationally. These tariffs, duties or restrictions could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Risks Related to Regulatory Requirements

WeOur product or manufacturing standards could fail to maintainalso be impacted by new or revised environmental rules and regulations or other social initiatives. Those rules, or similar rules that may be adopted in other jurisdictions, could adversely affect our Trusted Foundry accreditationcosts, the availability of minerals used in our New York Fabrication Facility.

Althoughproducts and our New York fabrication facility has not generated any revenue to date from its Trusted Foundry accreditation, a failure to maintain that accreditation in the future could hamper our ability to generate productrelationships with customers and foundry services revenue related to potential Aerospace and Defense customers.suppliers.

 


We may incur substantial expenses in connection with regulatory requirements, and any regulatory compliance failure could cause our business to suffer.

 

The wireless communications industry is subject to ongoing regulatory obligations and review. See “Business - Government Regulations” above. Maintaining compliance with these requirements may result in significant additional expense to us, and any failure to maintain such compliance could cause our business to suffer.

 

Noncompliance with applicable regulations or requirements could also subject us to investigations, sanctions, mandatory product recalls, enforcement actions, disgorgement of profits, fines, damages, civil and criminal penalties, or injunctions. An adverse outcome in any such litigation could require us to pay contractual damages, compensatory damages, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. These enforcement actions could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. If any governmental sanctions are imposed, or if we do not prevail in any possible civil or criminal litigation, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, responding to any action will likely result in a significant diversion of management’s attention and resources and an increase in professional fees.

 

Compliance with regulations regarding the use of “conflict minerals” could limit the supply and increase the cost of certain metals used in manufacturing our products.

 

Regulations in the United States require that we determine whether certain materials used in our products, referred to as conflict minerals, originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or adjoining countries, or originated from recycled or scrap sources. We anticipate that we will first be required to comply with the SEC’s conflict minerals rules for the 2017 calendar year, and we expect to incur costs associated with implementingour policies and procedures to comply with the applicable rules and due diligence procedures. In addition, the verification and reporting requirements could affect the sourcing and availability of minerals that are used in the manufacture of our products, and we may face reputational and competitive challenges if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins of all conflict minerals used in our products. We may also face challenges with government regulators, potential customers, suppliers and manufacturers if we are unable to sufficiently verify that the metals used in our products are conflict free.

 


There could be an adverse change or increase in the laws and/or regulations governing our business.

 

We and our operating subsidiarysubsidiaries are subject to various laws and regulations in different jurisdictions, and the interpretation and enforcement of laws and regulations are subject to change. We are also will be subject to different tax regulations in each of the jurisdictions where we will conduct our business or where our management or the management of our operating subsidiary is located. We expect that the scope and extent of regulation in these jurisdictions, as well as regulatory oversight and supervision, will generally continue to increase. There can be no assurance that future regulatory, judicial and legislative changes in any jurisdiction will not have a material adverse effect on us or hinder us in the operation of our business. In addition, we may incur substantial costs in order to comply with current or future environmental, health and safety laws and regulations applicable to us.

 

These current or future laws and regulations may impair our research, development or production efforts or impact the research activities we pursue. Our failure to comply with these laws and regulations also may result in substantial fines, penalties or other sanctions, which could cause our financial condition to suffer.

 


Investment Risks

 

You could lose all of your investment.

 

An investment in our securities is speculative and involves a high degree of risk. Potential investors should be aware that the value of an investment in the Company may go down as well as up. In addition, there can be no certainty that the market value of an investment in the Company will fully reflect its underlying value. You could lose your entire investment.

 

Our common stock tradeshas been thinly traded and its share price in low volumes, whichthe public markets has experienced, and may make it more difficult for investors to sell their shares quickly.in the future experience, extreme volatility.

 

Our Common Stock tradescommon stock has traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market, but it tradesunder the symbol “AKTS,” since March 13, 2017. Since that date, our common stock has been relatively thinly traded and at times been subject to price volatility. Recently, from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023, the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market ranged from $2.34 to $5.23 per share.

The trading price of our Common Stock may be significantly affected by various factors, including quarterly fluctuations in low volumes, whichour operating results, changes in investors’ and analysts’ perception of the business risks and conditions of our business, issuance of additional shares in connections with strategic transactions or acquisitions we may make, it more difficultour ability to meet the earnings estimates and other performance expectations of financial analysts or investors, unfavorable commentary or downgrades of our stock by equity research analysts, and general economic or political conditions. Additionally, the stock market and public companies with relatively smaller public floats in particular have been subject to extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of such companies. Additionally, technical factors in the public trading market for our stock may produce price movements that may or may not comport with macro, industry or company-specific fundamentals, including, without limitation, the sentiment of retail investors (including as may be expressed on financial trading and other social media sites), speculation in the press, in the investment community, or on the internet, including on online forums and social media, about our Company, our industry or our securities, the amount and status of short interest in our securities (including a “short squeeze”), access to margin debt, trading in options and other derivatives on our common stock and other technical trading factors. We may incur rapid and substantial decreases in our stock price in the foreseeable future that are unrelated to our operating performance or prospects. There can be no guarantee that our stock price will remain at current prices or that future sales of our common stock will not be at prices lower than the sales price in this offering.

The daily trading volume of our common stock has historically been relatively low. If we are unable to develop and maintain a liquid market for our common stock, you may not be able to sell their shares quickly.your common stock at prices you consider to be fair or at times that are convenient for you, or at all. This situation may be attributable to a number of factors, including but not limited to the fact that we are a development-stage company with a smaller public float that is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers,stockbrokers, institutional investors, and others in the investor community. In addition, investors may be risk averse to investments in development-stage companies. As a consequence, it may be more difficult for investors to sell their shares quickly and our stock price may be more sensitive to sales of our Common Stock in the market.companies with smaller public floats. The low trading volume is outside of our control and may not increase or, if it increases, may not be maintained. In addition, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, litigation has often been brought against that company and we may become the target of litigation as a result of price volatility. Litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources from our business. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 


YouStockholders may experience dilution of yourtheir ownership interests because of the future issuance of additional shares of our commonCommon Stock or preferred stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for our commonCommon Stock or preferred stock, including as a result of triggering price protection rights held by certain investors.stock.

 

In the future, we may issue our authorized but previously unissued equity securities, resulting in the dilution of the ownership interests of our stockholders. The Company is authorized to issue an aggregate of 45,000,000125,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. We may issue additional shares of our Common Stock or other securities that are  convertible into or exercisable for our Common Stock in connection with hiring or retaining employees, future acquisitions, future sales of our securities for capital raising purposes, or for other business purposes. In addition, as of September 8, 2017, warrants and6, 2023, options to purchase 602,632 and 160,000 shares, respectively, of our Common Stock remained outstanding. In addition, investors in the 2017 Offering (as defined under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Financing Activities” below) have certain price protection rights. Pursuant to such rights, if we issue3,156,037 shares of our Common Stock (subject to customary exceptions, including issuances of awards under Company employee stock incentive programs and certain issuances in connection with credit arrangements) at a price less than $9.00 per share, investors in the 2017 Offering will be entitled to receive (for no additional consideration) additional shares of our Common Stock in an amount such that, when added to the number of shares of Common Stock they initially purchased in the 2017 Offering, will equal the number of shares of Common Stock that their investment in the 2017 Offering would have purchased at the lower purchase price.were outstanding. The future issuance of additional shares of our Common Stock may create downward pressure on the trading price of the Common Stock. We willmay need to raise additional capital in the near future to meet our working capital needs, and there can be no assurance that we will not be required to issue additional shares, warrants or other convertible securities in the future in conjunction with these capital raising efforts, including at a price (or exercise prices) below the price you paid for your stock.

 

We do not anticipate paying dividends on our Common Stock.

Cash dividends have never been declared or paid on our Common Stock, and we do not anticipate such a declaration or payment for the foreseeable future. We expect to use future earnings, if any, to fund business growth. Therefore, stockholders will not receive any funds absent a sale of their shares of Common Stock. If we do not pay dividends, our Common Stock may be less valuable because a return on your investment will only occur if our stock price appreciates. We cannot assure stockholders that our stock price will appreciate or that they will receive a positive return on their investment if and when they sell their shares.

General Risk Factors

Security breaches and other disruptions could compromise our proprietary information and expose us to liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.

We rely on trade secrets, technical know-how and other unpatented proprietary information relating to our product development and manufacturing activities to provide us with competitive advantages. We protect this information by entering into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, strategic partners and other third parties. We also design our computer networks and implement various procedures to restrict unauthorized access to dissemination of our proprietary information.

We face internal and external data security threats. Current, departing or former employees or third parties that improperly use or access our computer systems and networks could copy, obtain or misappropriate our proprietary information or otherwise interrupt our business. Like other businesses, we are also subject to significant system or network disruptions from numerous causes, including computer viruses and other cyber-attacks, facility access issues, new system implementations and energy blackouts.

Security breaches, computer malware, phishing, spoofing, and other cyber-attacks have become more prevalent and sophisticated in recent years. Geopolitical instability, such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, may increase the likelihood that we will experience direct or collateral consequences from cyber conflicts between nation-states or other politically motivated actors targeting critical technology infrastructure. While we defend against these threats on a daily basis, we do not believe that such attacks to date have caused us any material damage. Because the techniques used by computer hackers and others to access or sabotage networks constantly evolve and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate, counter or ameliorate all of these techniques. As a result, our and our customers’ proprietary information may be misappropriated, and the impact of any future incident cannot be predicted. Any loss of such information could harm our competitive position, result in a loss of customer confidence in the adequacy of our threat mitigation and detection processes and procedures, cause us to incur significant costs to remedy the damages caused by the incident, and divert management and other resources. We routinely implement improvements to our network security safeguards and we are devoting increasing resources to the security of our information technology systems. We cannot, however, assure that such system improvements will be sufficient to prevent or limit the damage from any future cyber-attack or network disruption.

The costs related to cyber-attacks or other security threats or computer systems disruptions typically would not be fully insured or indemnified by others. Occurrence of any of the events described above could result in loss of competitive advantages derived from our R&D efforts or our intellectual property. Moreover, these events may result in the early obsolescence of our products, product development delays, or diversion of the attention of management and key information technology and other resources, or otherwise adversely affect our internal operations and reputation or degrade our financial results and stock price.


We may be subject to theft, loss, or misuse of personal data by or about our employees, customers or other third parties, which could increase our expenses, damage our reputation, or result in legal or regulatory proceedings.

In the ordinary course of our business, we have access to sensitive, confidential or personal data or information regarding our employees and others that is subject to privacy and security laws and regulations. The theft, loss, or misuse of personal data collected, used, stored, or transferred by us to run our business, or by our third-party service providers, including business process software applications providers and other vendors that have access to sensitive data, could result in damage to our reputation, disruption of our business activities, significantly increased business and security costs or costs related to defending legal claims.

Global privacy legislation, enforcement, and policy activity in this area are rapidly expanding and creating a complex regulatory compliance environment. For example, the European Union has adopted the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which requires companies to comply with rules regarding the handling of personal data, including its use, protection and the ability of persons whose data is stored to correct or delete such data about themselves. Failure to meet GDPR requirements could result in penalties of up to the higher of €20 million or 4% of worldwide revenue. In addition, the interpretation and application of consumer and data protection laws in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere are often uncertain and fluid, and may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our data practices. Complying with these changing laws has caused, and could continue to cause, us to incur substantial costs, which could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Further, failure to comply with existing or new rules may result in significant penalties or orders to stop the alleged non-compliant activity. Finally, even our inadvertent failure to comply with federal, state, or international privacy-related or data protection laws and regulations could result in audits, regulatory inquiries or proceedings against us by governmental entities or others.

Our business and operations would suffer in the event of system failures, and our operations are vulnerable to interruption by natural disasters, terrorist activity, power loss and other events beyond our control, the occurrence of which could materially harm our business.

Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems and those of our contractors and consultants are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, unauthorized access as well as telecommunication and electrical failures. While we have not experienced any such system failure, accident or security breach to date, if such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, it could result in a material disruption of our R&D. If any disruption or security breach resulted in a loss of or damage to our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability and/or the further development of our technology for RF filters could be delayed.

We are also vulnerable to accidents, electrical blackouts, fires, labor strikes, terrorist activities, war, natural disasters, including hurricanes, earthquakes, floods and tornadoes, and other events beyond our control, and we have not undertaken a systematic analysis of the potential consequences to our business as a result of any such events and do not have an applicable recovery plan in place. We carry business interruption insurance that would compensate us for certain actual losses from interruptions of our business that may occur, however that may not fully cover all losses incurred, any losses or damages incurred could cause our business to materially suffer.

Litigation or legal proceedings, including product liability claims, could expose us to significant liabilities, occupy a significant amount of our management’s time and attention and damage our reputation.

We are from time to time party to various litigation claims and legal proceedings. We evaluate these claims and proceedings to assess the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes and estimate, if possible, the amount of potential losses. If we or any of our manufacturers fails to successfully manufacture wafers that conform to our design specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FCC, it may result in substantial risk of undetected flaws in components or other materials used by our manufacturers during fabrication of our products and could lead to product defects and costs to repair or replace these parts or materials, significantly impacting our ability to develop and implement our technology and to improve performance of our products. In addition, claims made or threatened by our suppliers, customers or current or former employees could adversely affect our relationships, damage our reputation or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. The costs associated with defending product liability and other claims, and the payment of damages, could be substantial. Our reputation could also be adversely affected by such claims, whether or not successful.


We may establish reserves as appropriate based upon assessments and estimates in accordance with our accounting policies in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We base our assessments, estimates and disclosures on the information available to us at the time and rely on legal and management judgment. Actual outcomes or losses may differ materially from assessments and estimates. Actual settlements, judgments or resolutions of these claims or proceedings may negatively affect our business and financial performance. A successful claim against us that is not covered by insurance or is in excess of our available insurance limits could require us to make significant payments of damages and could materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Delaware law, our charter documents and the ability of our Board of Directors to issue additional stock could impede or discourage a takeover or change of control that stockholders may consider favorable.

As a Delaware corporation, we are subject to certain anti-takeover provisions. Under Delaware law, a corporation may not engage in a business combination with any holder of 15 percent or more of its capital stock unless the holder has held the stock for three years or, among other things, the board of directors has approved the transaction. Accordingly, our Board of Directors could rely on Delaware law to prevent or delay an acquisition of our company. In addition, certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or changes in our management. These provisions include only our Board of Directors being able to fill vacancies on the Board and various limitations in our bylaws on stockholder meeting, including advance notice requirements for stockholders to make more difficult certain transactions, includingnominations of candidates for election as directors or to bring matters before an annual meeting of stockholders and our stockholders not having the ability to call a sale or merger of the Company.special meeting.

 

Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with powers, rights and preferences designated by it. Shares of voting or convertible preferred stock could be issued, or rights to purchase such shares could be issued, to create voting impediments or to frustrate persons seeking to effect a takeover or otherwise gain control of the Company. The ability of the Board to issue such additional shares of preferred stock, with rights and preferences it deems advisable, could discourage an attempt by a party to acquire control of the Company by tender offer or other means. Such issuances could therefore deprive stockholders of benefits that could result from such an attempt, such as the realization of a premium over the market price for their shares in a tender offer or the temporary increase in market price that such an attempt could cause. Moreover, the issuance of such additional shares of preferred stock to persons friendly tosupporting of the Board of Directors could make it more difficult to remove incumbent managers and directors from office even if such change were to be favorable to stockholders generally.

 

We do not anticipate paying dividendsOur bylaws provide, subject to certain exceptions, that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for certain stockholder litigation matters, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, employees or stockholders.

Our bylaws provide, subject to limited exceptions, that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for any claims, including any derivative actions or proceedings brought on our Common Stock.

Cash dividends have never been declaredbehalf, (1) that are based upon a violation of a duty by a current or paid onformer director or officer or stockholder in such capacity or (2) that may be brought in the Court of Chancery pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our Common Stock shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the provisions of our bylaws described above. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, other employees or stockholders which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision that is contained in our bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we do not anticipatemay incur additional costs associated with resolving such a declaration or payment for the foreseeable future. We expect to use future earnings, if any, to fundaction in other jurisdictions, which could materially adversely affect our business, growth. Therefore, stockholders will not receive any funds absent a salefinancial condition and results of their shares of Common Stock. If we do not pay dividends, our Common Stock may be less valuable because a return on your investment will only occur if our stock price appreciates. We cannot assure stockholders that our stock price will appreciate or that they will receive a positive return on their investment if and when they sell their shares.operations.

 


We are an emerging growthAs a smaller reporting company and the reduceda non-accelerated filer, we are subject to scaled disclosure requirements applicablethat may make it more challenging for investors to emerging growth companies will makeanalyze our results of operations and financial prospects and may cause investors to find our Common Stock less attractive to investors.attractive.

 

We are an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growthAs a smaller reporting company, we intendare subject to scaled disclosure requirements that may make it more challenging for investors to analyze our results of operations and financial prospects. For instance, as a “smaller reporting company,” which is generally defined as a company with less than $250 million of public float or a company with less than $100 million in annual revenues and either no public float or a public float of less than $700 million, we may elect to provide simplified executive compensation disclosures in our filings and take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies including, but not limited to, reduceddecreased disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reportsfilings with the SEC, including being required to provide only two years of audited financial statements in our annual reports. Consequently, it may be more challenging for investors to analyze our results of operations and proxy statements, exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory stockholder vote on executive compensationfinancial prospects. Additionally, under current SEC rules, we are not an “accelerated filer” and any golden parachute paymentsso not previously approved, exemption from the requirement ofrequired to include an auditor attestation inof the assessmenteffectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and exemption from any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. If we do, the information that we provide stockholders may be different than what is available with respect to other public companies.in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We cannot predict if investors will find our Common Stock less attractive because we willmay rely on these exemptions.reduced requirements. If some investors find our Common Stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our Common Stock and the price of shares of our stock priceCommon Stock may be more volatile.

 

Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected to take advantage of this extended transition period. Since we will not be required to comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for other public companies, our financial statements may not be comparable to the financial statements of companies that comply with the effective dates of those accounting standards.

We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (1) the end of the fiscal year in which the market value of our Common Stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the end of the second fiscal quarter, (2) the end of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenues of $1.07 billion or more during such fiscal year, (3) the date on which we issue more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt in a three-year period or (4) June 30, 2019, the end of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of the first sale of our common stock pursuant to an effective registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Decreased disclosures in our SEC filings due to our status as an “emerging growth company” may make it harder for investors to analyze our results of operations and financial prospects.

Even after we no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, we may still qualify as a “smaller reporting company,” which would allow us to take advantage of many of the same exemptions from disclosure requirements, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation. Some investors may find our Common Stock less attractive because we rely on these exemptions, there may be a less active trading market for our Common Stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

Being a public company is expensive and administratively burdensome.

 

As a public reporting company, we are subject to the information and reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and other federal securities laws, rules and regulations related thereto, including compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Complying with these laws and regulations requires the time and attention of our Board of Directors and management and increases our expenses. Among other things, we are required to:

 

 maintain and evaluate a system of internal control over financial reporting in compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the related rules and regulations of the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board;

 maintain policies relating to disclosure controls and procedures;

 prepare and distribute periodic reports in compliance with our obligations under federal securities laws;

 institute a more comprehensive compliance function, including with respect to corporate governance; and

 involve, to a greater degree, our outside legal counsel and accountants in the above activities.

 

The costs of preparing and filing annual and quarterly reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC and furnishing audited reports to stockholders is expensive and much greater than that of a privately-held company, and compliance with these rules and regulations may require us to hire additional financial reporting, internal controls and other finance personnel, and will involve a material increase in regulatory, legal and accounting expenses and the attention of management. There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the applicable regulations in a timely manner, if at all. In addition, being a public company makes it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance. In the future, we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain this coverage. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified executives and members of our Board of Directors, particularly directors willing to serve on the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.

 

If we fail to remediate the identified material weakness and maintain effective controls and procedures, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial condition, and the price of our Common Stock.

We are required to maintain disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to include in our annual reports on Form 10-K an assessment by management of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. As disclosed in Item 9A of this Report, our management identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, causing our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting to be ineffective as of June 30, 2017. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Remediation of the material weakness will require management attention and cause the Company to incur additional expenses. If we fail to remediate the material weakness, or if we are unable to maintain effective controls and procedures in the future, our ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information accurately and within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC could be adversely affected, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, and we may be subject to investigation or sanctions by the SEC. Any such consequence or other negative effect could adversely affect our operations, financial condition, and the price of our Common Stock.

In addition, at such time, if any, as we are no longer a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company, our independent registered public accounting firm will have to attest to and report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. If and when we are required to have our independent registered public accounting firm attest to management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, if our independent registered public accounting firm is not satisfied with the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, or if the independent auditors interpret the requirements, rules, or regulations differently than we do, then they may decline to attest to management’s assessment or may issue a report that is qualified. Any of these events could result in a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which could negatively affect the price of our Common Stock.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

None.


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

 

Our current headquarters in Huntersville, NC is a 4,800-square foot facility that we lease for base rent of $4,700 per month, with a term expiring in April 2018; however, due to increased headcount hired to support business operations in North Carolina, we have executed a new 60-month lease for an adjoining facility which is expected to commence on or about November 1, 2017. The new facility is 10,40022,400 square feet, and its base rent is $9,800approximately $22,000 per month. The current 4,800-square foot facility will be vacated at the commencement of the new lease. Onmonth with a term expiring February 2026. In June 26, 2017, the Company acquired a 120,000 square foot MEMS fabrication facility in Canandaigua, NY (the “NY Facility”). The Company has entered into a Lease and Project Agreement and a Company Lease Agreement with the Ontario County Industrial Development Agency, a public benefit corporation of the State of New York.York (the “OCIDA”), covering the NY Facility, pursuant to which the Company leases the NY Facility to the OCIDA for nominal consideration and the OCIDA leases the NY Facility back to the Company for annual rent payments set forth in such agreements.

As part of the acquisition of RFMi, the Company assumed a lease in Carrollton, Texas. The current NY facility houses approx. 35 employees andlease covering this property is only 15% utilized. currently scheduled to expire in March 2025.

As part of the acquisition of GDSI, the Company entered into a lease in San Jose, California. The lease covering this property is currently scheduled to expire in December 2025.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022, the Company entered into a new office lease located in Taiwan. The lease covering this property is currently scheduled to expire in May 2025.

The Company believes the new 10,400-square foot facility in Huntersville, NC, once occupied, along with the recently acquired facility in New Yorkthat its existing facilities will be suitable and sufficient to meet the Company’s needs for the next three to fiveseveral years.

 


ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in any suchthese or other matters may arise from time to time that may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations and prospects.

 

WeExcept for the matters described under “Litigation, Claims and Assessments” in “Note 15 – Commitments and Contingencies” of the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which description is incorporated in this “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” by reference, we are currently not aware of any material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or of which any of our property is the subject, nor are we aware of any such proceedings that are contemplated by any governmental authority.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

Not applicable.

 


PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Market Information and Holders

 

Our Common Stock is currently traded on the NASDAQNasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “AKTS.” Prior to March 13, 2017, our Common Stock was quoted on the OTC Market (OTCQB) under the same symbol. There has been limited trading in our Common Stock to date.

 

As of September 8, 2017, 19,084,58301, 2023, 72,351,827 shares of our Common Stock were issued and outstanding and were held by approximately 15188 stockholders of record.

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices (or closing bid prices with respect to periods prior to March 13, 2017) for our Common Stock for the fiscal quarters indicated, as reported on NASDAQ (or on OTC Markets with respect to closing bids for periods prior to March 13, 2017). OTC Market quotations for periods prior to March 13, 2017 reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

 

Period  High  Low 
        
Quarter ended September 30, 2015  $5.00  $2.75 
Quarter ended December 31, 2015   4.15   1.55 
Quarter ended March 31, 2016   2.00   1.50 
Quarter ended June 30, 2016   4.40   1.90 
Quarter ended September 30, 2016   4.49   3.50 
Quarter ended December 31, 2016   5.85   3.91 
Quarter ended March 31, 2017   12.90   5.44 
Quarter ended June 30, 2017   12.21   8.40 

Dividends

 

Dividends

We have never paid any dividends on our capital stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our Common Stock in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain future earnings to fund ongoing operations and future capital requirements. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent upon financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant.

 


Warrants, Options and OptionsRestricted Stock Units

 

As of June 30, 2017,2023, there were outstanding warrants and options to purchase 612,1653,156,037 shares of our Common Stock and 160,000 shares of our Common Stock, respectively. There are no otherStock. Additionally, there were outstanding convertible securities of the Company.3,428,235 restricted stock units.

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information as of June 30, 2023

 

The following table provides information as of June 30, 2017,2023, relating to our equity compensation plans, under which grants of options, restricted stock, and other equity awards may be made from time to time:

 

Plan category Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
  Weighted-
average exercise
price of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
  Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a)
 
  (a)  (b)  (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  160,000(1) $1.50   2,728,000(2)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders         
             
Total  160,000(1)      2,728,000(2)
Plan category Number of
securities
to be issued
upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
  Weighted-
average
exercise
price of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
  Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future
issuance
under equity
compensation
plans
(excluding
securities
reflected in
column (a)
 
   (a)   (b)   (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders - options  3,156,037(1) $6.61   4,638,242(4)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders – restricted stock units  3,064,882(2) $0.00    
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  363,353(3)      
             
Total  6,584,272       4,638,242(4)

 

(1)(1)The 160,000Consists of (i) 130,000 shares of Common Stock to be issuedissuable upon the exercise of outstanding options are issuableissued under the Company’s 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”), (ii) 770,502 issuable under the Company’s 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”), (iii) and 2,255,535 issuable under the Company’s 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”).

 

(2)Consists of 3,064,882 shares of Common Stock to be issued upon the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units issuable under the 2018 Plan.

(2)(3)Consists of 363,353 shares of Common Stock to be issued upon the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units to be issued outside of an approved plan.

(4)As of June 30, 2017, 2,728,0002023, 4,638,242 additional shares of Common Stock remained available for future issuance under the Company’s 2016 Stock Incentive2018 Plan. No additional grants will be made under the Company’s 2014 Stock Plan (the “2014 Plan”), the 2015 Plan or the 2015 Plan.2016 Plan.

 

Recent sales of unregistered securities


 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

We havedid not soldsell any equity securities during the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172023 that were not registered under the Securities Act, other than as previously reported in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and our Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.

 

Purchases of Equity Securities

Unvested restricted stock grants awarded under the 2014 Plan and the 2015 Plan are subject to Company repurchase options upon certain terminations of the recipient’s service with the Company. As of June 30, 2017, 1,352,265, shares of restricted stock remained subject to repurchase options, which are scheduled to expire between January 2018 and December 2020. We did not repurchase any of our equity securities pursuant to these repurchase options or otherwise during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.

Transfer Agent

The transfer agent for our Common Stock is Globex Transfer, LLC. The transfer agent’s address is 780 Deltona Blvd., Suite 202, Deltona, FL 32725 and its telephone number is 813-344-4490.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA[RESERVED]

Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.

 


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the historical financial statements and the related notes thereto contained in this Report.Annual Report on Form 10-K. See also the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information” on page 1ii of this Report.

 

The following discussion highlights the results of operations and the principal factors that have affected our financial condition, as well as our liquidity and capital resources for the periods described, and provides information that management believes is relevant for an assessment and understanding of the statements of financial condition and results of operations presented herein. The following discussion and analysis are based on the audited financial statements contained in this Report, which we have prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. You should read the discussion and analysis together with such financial statements and the related notes thereto.


Overview

 

Overview

Akoustis Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was incorporated in 2013. The Company is an early-stageemerging commercial product company focused on developing, designing, and manufacturing innovative RF filter productssolutions for the mobile wireless device industry, including for products such as smartphones and tablets, cellularnetwork infrastructure equipment, Wi-Fi Customer Premise Equipment (“CPE”) and WiFi premise equipment.defense applications. Filters are critical in selecting and rejecting signals, and their performance enables differentiation in the modules defining the RF front-end (“RFFE”). Located between the device’s antenna and its digital backend, the RFFE“RFFE” is the circuitry that performs the analog signal processing and contains components such as amplifiers, filters and switches. To construct the resonators that are the building blocks for the RF filter, weWe have developed a fundamentally new single-crystalproprietary microelectromechanical system (“MEMS”) based bulk acoustic materials and device technology that we refer to as BulkONE®. Filters are critical in selecting and rejecting signals, and their performance enables differentiation in the modules defining the RFFE. 

We believe owning the core resonatorwave (“BAW”) technology and a unique manufacturing process flow, called “XBAW”, for our designs is the most direct and effective means of delivering our solutions to the market. Furthermore, our technology is based upon bulk-mode resonance, which is superior to surface-mode resonancefilters produced for use in RFFE modules. Our XBAWTM filters incorporate optimized high purity piezoelectric materials for high band applications 4G/LTE, emergingpower, high frequency and wide bandwidth operation. We are developing RF Filters for 5G, Wi-Fi and WiFi 5GHz frequency bands. Whiledefense bands using our target customers utilize or make the RFFE module, several customers lack access to critical high band technology to compete in high band applicationsproprietary resonator device models and other traditional surface-mode solutions where higher power performance is required. We intend toproduct design manufacture and marketkits (PDKs). As we qualify our RF filter products, to multiple mobile phone OEM, cellular infrastructure and WiFi router customers and enable broader competition among the front-end module manufacturers. We plan to operate as a “pure-play” RF filter supplier and alignwe are engaging with the front-end module manufacturers who seek to acquire high performance filters to grow their module business.

We have built prototype resonators using our proprietary single-crystal materials. We are currently optimizing our BulkONE® technology in our 120,000 sq. ft. wafer-manufacturing plant located in Canandaigua, New York. We leverage both federal and state level, non-dilutive R&D grants to support development and commercialization of our technology. We are developing resonators for 4G/LTE, emerging 5G and WiFi bands and the associated proprietary models and design kits required to design our RF filters. Once we have stabilized the wafer process technology, we plan to engage with strategictarget customers to evaluate first our resonators and then our filter prototypes. solutions.

Our initial designs target UHB, sub-7 GHz 5G, Wi-Fi and defense bands. We expect our filter solutions will target high band 4G/LTE, emergingaddress problems (such as loss, bandwidth, power handling, and isolation) created by the growing number of frequency bands in the RFFE of mobile devices, infrastructure and premise equipment to support 5G and WiFiWi-Fi. We have prototyped, sampled and begun commercial shipment of our single-band low loss BAW filter designs for 5G frequency bands. Since Akoustis owns its core technologybands and controls access5 GHz and 6 GHz Wi-Fi bands, which are suited to its intellectual property, we can offer several ways to engagecompetitive BAW solutions and historically cannot be addressed with potential customers. First, we can engage with the mobile wireless market, providing filters that we design and offer as a standard catalog component to multiple customers. Second, we can start with a customer-supplied filter specification,low-band, lower power handling surface acoustic wave (“SAW”) technology. Additionally, through our wholly owned subsidiary, RFMi, of which we designacquired majority ownership in October 2021 and fabricate forfull ownership in April 2023, we operate a specific customer. Finally,fabless business whereby we canmake sales of complementary SAW resonators, RF filters, crystal (“Xtal”) resonators and oscillators, and ceramic products—addressing opportunities in multiple end markets, such as automotive and industrial applications. We also offer back-end semiconductor supply chain services through our models and design kits for our customers to design their own filter into our proprietary technology.wholly owned subsidiary, GDSI, which we acquired in January 2023.

 

In December 2014, Akoustis, Inc. was awarded its first small business innovative research (“SBIR”) R&D grant with the National Science Foundation (“NSF”). The NSF program, which increases the incentive and opportunity for startups and small businesses to undertake cutting-edge, high-quality scientific research and development, requires that the grantee have full responsibility for the conduct of the project or activity supported and the adherence to the award conditions. Total funds received from the NSF and matching funds from North Carolina Science, Technology & Innovation Department of Commerce since inception through September 8, 2017 total $892,000.

Our partnership with NSF has strengthened since the start of our engagement, and its support has accelerated our technology commercialization as well as funded technical jobs. We have additional opportunities for new grants and matching funds from our current small business program partnership with NSF including the Phase IIb award.

We have earned minimal revenue from operations since inception, and our operations have been funded with capital contributions, grants and debt. We have incurred losses totaling approximately $15.8 million from inception through June 30, 2017. These losses are primarily the result of material and material processing costs associated with developing and commercializing our technology as well as personnel costs, professional fees (primarily accounting and legal) as well as other general and administrative expenses offset by the $1.7 million gain from the bargain acquisition of the STC-MEMS Business in June 2017. We expect to continue to incur substantial costs for commercialization of our technology on a continuous basis because our business model involves materials and solid-state device technology development as well asand engineering of catalog and custom filter designs.

Asdesign solutions. To succeed across our combined portfolio of September 8, 2017, the Company had $6.7 million of cashAkoustis, XBAW, and cash equivalents.  The Company believes this is sufficient to cover our cost of operations including anticipated capital expenditures through December 31, 2017. As a result, we will need to obtain additional capital through the sale of additional equity securities, debt and additional grants, or otherwise, to fund operations past that date.  There is no assurance that the Company’s projections and estimates are accurate. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.


Plan of Operation

We plan to commercialize our technology by designing and manufacturing single-band and multi-band BAW RF filter from our NY wafer fabrication facility. Our filter solutions address problems (such as loss, bandwidth, power handling and isolation) created by the growing number of frequency bands in the RFFE of mobile devices to support 4G/LTE, emerging 5G and WiFi. We have prototyped our first single-band low-loss BAW filter designs for 4G/LTE frequency bands, which are dominated by competitive BAW solutions and historically cannot be addressed with low band, lower power handling SAW technology. During the second half of calendar 2017, we plan to sample filter product prototypes to prospective customers that cover LTE-Band 41, Radar, and 5GHz WiFi frequency bands.

In order to succeed,RFMi products, we must convince customers in a wide range of industries including mobile phone OEMs, RFFE module manufacturers, cellularnetwork infrastructure OEMs, Wi-Fi CPE OEMs, medical device makers, and WiFi router OEMsdefense customers to use our BulkONE® technologyproducts in their systems and modules. However,For example, since there are only two dominant BAW filter suppliers in the industry that have high bandhigh-band technology, and both utilize such technology as a competitive advantage at the module level, we expect customers that lack access to high bandhigh-band filter technology will be open to engage with our pure-playcompany for XBAW filters.

To help drive our XBAW filter company.

Oncebusiness, we complete customer validation of our technology, we expect to complete qualification of our BulkONE® process technology in the second half of calendar 2017 to support a product family of 4G/LTE filter solutions. Once we have stabilized our process technology in a manufacturing environment, we will complete a production release of our high band filter products in the frequency range from 2.5GHz to 6.0GHz. The target frequency bands will be prioritized based upon customer priority. We expect this will require recruiting and hiring additional personnel and capital investments.

We plan to continue to pursue RF filter design and R&D development agreements and potentially joint ventures with target customers and other strategic partners.partners, although we cannot guarantee we will be successful in these efforts. These types of arrangements may subsidize technology development costs and qualification, filter design costs, as well asand offer complementary technology and market intelligence and other avenues to revenue. However, we intend to retain ownership of our core XBAW technology, intellectual property, designs, and related improvements. WeAcross our combined portfolio of Akoustis, XBAW, and RFMi products, we expect to pursuecontinue development of catalog designs for multiple customers and to offer such catalog products in multiple sales channels.

 

WePlease see Item 1. Business for more information.


Business Environment and Current Trends

Impact of COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted business activity across the globe. In particular, COVID-19 contributed to delays we observed in certain suppliers’ shipment of materials necessary for us to manufacture our products and in certain vendors’ ability to deliver equipment for installation at our facilities. Although the effects of COVID-19 and its impact on our supply chain have successfully transferredeased since the peak of the pandemic and related lock-down protocols imposed by local governments, including China, we will continue to actively monitor the situation and may take further actions altering our BulkONE® wafer process to our STC-MEMS Business. The BulkONE® process uses a range of single-crystal group III-nitride piezoelectric materials, which were fabricated into BAW resonators and characterized at cellular communication frequencies tobusiness operations that we determine their bandwidth. On May 23, 2016, we announced an experimental, 3.4 GHz BAW two-port series-configured resonator device with a high K-squared of 12.5%, which was modeled near resonance frequency and was constructed from single-crystal undoped aluminum nitride (AlN) material. On August 8, 2016, we announced improvements to our single-crystal BAW resonator design and process technology to achieve a quality factor (Q) of 2090, which is suitable for BAW RF filters targeting 4G/LTE, WIFI and emerging 5G and 5G WIFI mobile wireless applications. These resonators, which are the core building blocks enabling BAW RF filters, were fabricated using our patented BulkONE® process. Technology development efforts continue on wafer and process optimization, specifically, through targeted activities for Q-factor improvements.

As referenced in the Business section, in August 2016, Akoustis announced its first customer engagement signing multiple non-exclusive agreements with a Chinese tier one RF front end (RFFE) module manufacturer to supplybest interests of our employees, customers, partners, suppliers, and stakeholders, or as required by federal, state, or local authorities. The effect that any such alterations or modifications may have on our business, including the Company’s premium RF filter productseffects on our customers, employees, and prospects, or on our financial results for next-generation high-band RFFE modules for 4G, emerging 4.5G and 5G mobile - targeting the China and India OEM markets. In December 2016, the Company announced its second customer engagement, for the development of a band-specific, high-frequency (above 3.5 GHz) BAW RF filter for a non-mobile commercial application with a well-established OEM specializing in non-mobile communication systems with annual revenue of more than $1 Billion.  In May 2017, the Company announced its third customer engagement for the development of high-performance BAW diplexers for non-mobile communication systems with a multi-billion dollar, Fortune 500 U.S. company, which provides systems, products and solutions to government and commercial customers worldwide. fiscal year 2024 or beyond is unclear.

 


In August 2017, the Company announced its first shipmentSemiconductor Shortages and Supply Chain Issues

The global silicon semiconductor industry continues to experience a shortage in supply and difficulties in ability to meet customer demand. This shortage has led to an increase in lead-times of premium high-band BAW RF filter prototypes manufactured using its patented single-crystal BulkONE® technology to the aforementioned Chinese tier one customer. The shipment included high performance, LTE-TDD Band 41, 2.6 GHz BAW RF filters that will satisfy the challenging filter requirementsproduction of semiconductor chips and components. As our business depends in the high growth 4G LTE mobile market in China.

We will continue discussions with additional prospective customers, although these discussions may not result in any agreements. We expect to proceed with our plan to develop a familysignificant part upon manufacturers of standard catalog filter designs regardless of the outcome of these discussions.

As of September 8, 2017, we had approximately $6.7 million of cash and cash equivalents to fund a majority of the foregoing milestones, for product development to commercialize our technology, research and development, the development of our patent strategy and expansion of our patent portfolio,products requiring semiconductors, as well as for working capitalthe current and other general corporate purposes. These fundsanticipated production of these products, we have sought to manage the impact of supply shortages though carefully maintaining and increasing key inventory levels. In some cases, we have incurred higher costs to secure available inventory, or have extended our purchase commitments or placed non-cancellable orders with suppliers, which introduces inventory risk if our forecasts and assumptions are expected to be sufficient to fundinaccurate. We believe the global supply chain challenges and their adverse impact on our activitiesbusiness and financial results will persist through December 2017. However, there is no assurance that the Company’s projections and estimates are accurate. Our anticipated costs include employee salaries and benefits, compensation paid to consultants, capital costs for research and other equipment, costs associated with development activities including travel and administration, legal expenses, sales and marketing costs, general and administrative expenses, and other costs associated with an early stage, publicly-traded technology company. We anticipate increasing the number of employees by approximately 15 to 20 employees in the next twelve months; however, this is highly dependent on the nature of our development efforts, our success in commercialization, and our ability to raise additional funding. We anticipate adding employees for research and development in both our New York and North Carolina facilities, as well as general and administrative functions, to support our efforts.calendar year 2024. We expect these constrained supply conditions to incur consulting expenses related to technology developmentincrease our costs of goods sold and other efforts as well as legal and related expenses to protect our intellectual property. We expect capital expenditures to be approximately $7.5 million for the purchase of equipment and software during the next 12 months and are currently investigating the feasibility of using debt facilities, equipment leases, or government grants to fund all or part of the purchase of the equipment.

The amounts we actually spend for any specific purpose may vary significantly and will depend on a number of factors including, but not limited to, the pace of progress of our commercialization and development efforts, actual needsincrease uncertainty with respect to product testing, R&D, market conditions, and changes in or revisions to our marketing strategies. In addition, we may use a portionthe timing of any net proceeds to acquire complementary products, technologies or businesses; however, we do not have plans for any acquisitions at this time.

Commercial developmentdelivery of new technology is, by its nature, unpredictable. Although we will undertake development efforts with commercially reasonable diligence, there can be no assurance that our current cash position will be sufficient to enable us to commercialize our technology to the extent needed to create future sales to sustain operations as contemplated herein. If our current cash is insufficient for these purposes, or the Company does not receive anticipated proceeds from research grants or such grant payments are delayed, or the Company experiences costs in excess of estimates to continue its research and development plan, it is possible that the Company would not have sufficient resources to continue as a going concern for the next year, and we will consider other options to continue our path to commercialization, including, but not limited to, additional financing through follow-on stock offerings, debt financing, co-development agreements, curtailment of operations, suspension of operations, sale or licensing of developed intellectual or other property, or other alternatives.specific customer orders.

If we are unable to obtain the funds that we believe are needed to develop our technology and enable future sales, we may be required to scale back our development plans by reducing expenditures for employees, consultants, business development and marketing efforts, and other envisioned expenditures. This could reduce our ability to commercialize our technology or require us to seek further funding earlier, or on less favorable terms.

We cannot assure you that our technology will be accepted, that we will ever generate revenues sufficient to support our operations, or that we will ever be profitable. Furthermore, since we have no committed source of financing, there is no assurance that we will be able to obtain sufficient capital as and when we need it to continue our operations. If we cannot obtain sufficient capital as and when we need it, we may be required to severely curtail, or even to cease, our operations.

 


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Certain accounting policies and estimates are particularly important to the understanding of our financial position and results of operations and require the application of significant judgment by our management or can be materially affected by changes from period to period in economic factors or conditions that are outside of our control. As a result, they are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. In applying these policies, our management uses its judgment to determine the appropriate assumptions to be used in the determination of certain estimates. Those estimates are based on our historical operations, our future business plans and projected financial results, the terms of existing contracts, our observance of trends in the industry, information provided by our customers and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate.

 

Revenue Recognition

Application of the revenue recognition guidance requires a significant number of judgments and estimates, which may impact the amount and timing of revenue recognition and related disclosures. Refer to Note 3, "Summary of significant accounting policies" of our notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Report for additional information regarding our revenue recognition policies, significant judgements, and estimates.

Derivative Liability

 

The Company evaluates its options, warrants, convertible notes, and other contracts, if any, to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with paragraph 815-10-05-4 and Section 815-40-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as either an asset or a liability. The change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion, exercise or cancellation of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the date of conversion, exercise, or cancellation and then the related fair value is reclassified to equity.

 


In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.

 

The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

 

The Company adopted Section 815-40-15 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 815-40-15”) to determine whether an instrument (or an embedded feature) is indexed to the Company’s own stock.  Section 815-40-15 provides that an entity should use a two-step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions.

 

The Company utilizes a binomial option pricing modelMonte Carlo simulation to compute the fair value of the derivative liability and to mark to market the fair value of the derivative at each balance sheet date. The Company records the change in the fair value of the derivative as other income or expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

The Company measuresutilizes the with-and-without method, a form of the income approach model to compute the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on the guidance of ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. 

ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.


Fair value measurements are categorized using a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs used to measure fair value, which prioritize the inputs into three broad levels:

Level 1 - Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2 - Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date, and include those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies.

Level 3 - Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs may be usedits embedded derivatives associated with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.

Equity-based compensation

The Company recognizes compensation expense for all equity–based payments in accordance with ASC 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation". Under fair value recognition provisions, the Company recognizes equity–based compensation net of an estimated forfeiture rate and recognizes compensation cost only for those shares expected to vest over the requisite service period of the award.

Restricted stock awards are granted at the discretion of the Company. These awards are restricted as to the transfer of ownership and generally vest over the requisite service periods, typically over a four-year period (vesting on a straight–line basis).its convertible notes. The fair value of a stock award is equal to the fair marketembedded derivatives represents the difference in the present value of anticipated cash flows assuming the feature is present as compared to a share of Company stock onsecurity without the grant date.

The fair value of an option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black–Scholes option valuation model. The Black–Scholes option valuation model requires the development of assumptions that are inputs into the model. These assumptions are the value of the underlying share, the expected stock volatility, the risk–free interest rate, the expected life of the option, the dividend yield on the underlying stock and the expected forfeiture rate. Expected volatility is benchmarked against similar companies in a similar industry over the expected option life and other appropriate factors. Risk–free interest rates are calculated based on continuously compounded risk–free rates for the appropriate term. The dividend yield is assumed to be zero as the Company has never paid or declared any cash dividends on its Common Stock and does not intend to pay dividends on its Common Stock in the foreseeable future. The expected forfeiture rate is estimated based on management’s best estimate.

Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of equity–based payment awards requires the input of the subjective assumptions described above. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of equity–based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, which involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, our equity–based compensation could be materially different in the future. In addition, the Company is required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and recognize expense only for those shares expected to vest. If the Company’s actual forfeiture rate is materially different from its estimate, the equity–based compensation could be significantly different from what the Company has recorded in the current period. 

same feature. The Company accounts for share–based payments granted to non–employeesrecords the change in accordance with ASC 505-40, “Equity Based Payments to Non–Employees”. The Company determines the fair value of the stock–based paymentderivative as eitherother income or expense in the fair valueconsolidated statements of operations.

Fair Value of the consideration received orAcquired Intangible Assets

We perform valuations of assets acquired and liabilities assumed on each acquisition accounted for as a business combination and allocate the fairpurchase price of each acquired business to our respective assets and liabilities. Acquired intangible assets include developed technology, customer relationships and tradenames. We use various valuation techniques to value ofthese intangibles assets, with the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. Ifprimary technique being a discounted cash flow analysis. A discounted cash flow analysis requires us to make various assumptions, estimates and judgements including projected revenue, gross margins, operating costs, growth rates, useful lives and discount rates. We believe our assumptions, estimates, and judgements to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable and, as a result, actual results may differ from estimates. Estimates associated with the fair value ofaccounting for acquisitions may change as additional information becomes available regarding the equity instruments issued is used, it is measuredassets acquired and liabilities assumed. Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as ofstraight-line method which approximates the earlier of either (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, or (2) the date atpattern in which the counterparty’s performance is complete. The fair valueeconomic benefits of the equity instruments is re-measured each reporting period over the requisite service period.such assets are expected to be consumed.

 

34 


 

 

Results of Operations

 

Our results of operations are presented for the yearfiscal years ended June 30, 2017 compared to the year ended2023 and June 30, 2016. Our results of operations for the year ended June 30, 2017 include five days of operations of our STC-MEMS Business, which we acquired on June 26, 2017.2022.

 

Year Ended June 30, 20172023 Compared to Year Ended June 30, 20162022

 

Revenue

The Company recorded revenue of $486,000 for the year-ended June 30, 2017 as compared to $255,000 for the year ended June 30, 2016. The revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 was made up primarily of grant revenue from the National Science Foundation for the Phase II grant. The revenue recorded in the comparative fiscal year was also made up primarily of grant revenue from the National Science Foundation ($50,000 from Phase I and $192,000 for Phase II).

R&D expenses consist of costs for technical and engineering personnel, travel expense for R&D personnel and costs to develop and commercialize our technology including materials, material processing, and contractors. R&D expenses were $4.4 million for the year-ended June 30, 2017 and were $2.7 million, or 151.6%, higher than the prior year. The year-over-year increase was due to the ramp up of R&D activity in the Company’s third year of operations. The increased expenditures occurred primarily in areas of R&D personnel, stock-based compensation, and material costs. Personnel costs were $1.4 million compared to $717,000 in the comparative period, an increase of $654,000 or 91%. The increase included five days of costs associated with the New York foundry personnel (approximately $ 127,000), costs for the addition of technical and engineering hires in the North Carolina facility in the 2017 fiscal year, and the full year effect of N.C. new hires made in the prior fiscal year. Stock-based compensation of $1.3$27.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2017 was $1.12023 as compared to $15.4 million or 566%, higher thanfor the year ended June 30, 20162022. The increase of $11.7 million was primarily due to new restricted stock awards made to R&D personnelan increase in RF product revenue of $4.6 million or 34%, which includes revenue from sales of RFMi products. Additionally, revenue from fabrication services, which includes revenue from GDSI, increased by $7.1 million or 382%.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue includes direct labor, material, net realizable value (NRV) adjustments, and the change in the fair market valuefacility costs primarily associated with foundry services revenue, manufacturing of awards made to technicalfilter products and engineering contractors in prior periods. In addition, material and material process costs were $1.4services. The Company recorded cost of revenue of $30.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2023 as compared to $670,000 in$19.5 million for the comparative periodyear ended June 30, 2016 which was an2022. The $10.7 million increase of $681,000, or 102.0%. The year-over-year cost increase wasis primarily due to the rampcosts associated with RF product revenue which increased by $7.7 million or 45%, which includes cost of raw material purchases and material processingrevenue from sales of RFMi products. In addition, costs for product development activities.associated with fabrication services, which includes GDSI, increased by $3.1 million or 125%.

 

Research and Development Expenses

R&D expenses were $33.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2023 and were $2.5 million, or 7% lower than the prior year amount for the same period of $35.7 million. Personnel costs, including stock-based compensation, were $16.5 million compared to $17.9 million in the prior year period, a decrease of $1.4 million or 7.9%. Facility costs, including depreciation, of $7.8 million primarily associated with the NY Facility were $0.1 million lower than the prior period. Lastly, R&D material costs were $0.8 million lower than the prior period.

General and Administrative Expense

General and administrative (“G&A”) costsexpenses include salaries and wages for executive and administrative staff, stock-based compensation, professional fees, insurance costs and other general costs associated with the administration of our business. General and administrativeG&A expenses for the year ended June 30, 20172023 were $6.0$29.7 million, versus $2.9 million for the comparative period. Thewhich is an increase of $3.1$9.0 million or 105.0%, was associated mainly with increases in personnel costs, professional fees, insurance expense, stock-based compensation and travel. Personnel costs of $1.4 million were higher by $231,000, or 20.1%, duecompared to the increase in the number of administrative personnel, while professional fees of $1.2 million, associated with legal, accounting and investor relations, were higher by $645,000, or 113%. The legal, accounting and investor relations fees incurred in the year ended June 30, 2017 ramped up2022. Year-over-year changes within G&A expenses include an increase in employee compensation (including stock-based compensation) of $2.6 million as the resultwell as increased general expenses of Company’s second year of being a public reporting company; first on the OTC Market$5.9 million, primarily professional fees and then on NASDAQ. Stock-based compensationintangible amortization.

Other Income/(Expense)

Other income for the year ended June 30, 20172023 was $2.6$0.1 million and higher by $1.9compared to other expenses of $0.5 million or 295%, as a resultin fiscal year 2022. The $0.4 million increase in other income was primarily due to an increase in interest expense of the issuance of new awards for G&A personnel granted after June 2016 and the recording of the change in the fair market value of stock grants issued to investor relations consultants.

Other income and expense for the year ended June 30, 2017$2.2 million which was $850,000 and included a $1.7 million gain on bargain purchase related to the acquisition of the STC-MEMS Business, offset by an $877,000 loss on the fair valueincrease in income related changes in contingent liabilities and derivative liabilities resulting in income of derivatives for placement agent warrants issued in connection with private placements in 2015 and 2016. These warrants were amended in December 2016 and January 2017 to remove the derivative feature and are now classified as equity. Other expense was $967,000 for the year ended June 30, 2016 and was primarily related to the loss on fair value of derivatives recorded for the placement agent warrants referenced above.$2.3 million.

 

Net Loss

The Company recorded a net loss of $9.1$63.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2017,2023, compared to a net loss of $5.4$59.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2016.2022. The year-over-year incremental loss of $3.7$4.4 million, or 68%7%, was primarily driven by an increase in cost of revenue of $10.7 million, higher materialR&D and G&A personnel costs, due to the ramp upincluding stock based compensation of $1.2 million, as well as an increase in professional fees and intangible amortization of $6.1 million. These increases were partially offset by decreases in R&D materials and facility costs of $0.9 million as well as an increase in revenue of $11.7 million.

These increases were partially offset by decreases in R&D materials and facility costs of $0.9 million as well as an increase in revenue of $11.7 million.


Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

The Company’s short-term and long-term liquidity requirements primarily arise from funding (i) research and development activities, higher professional fees dueexpenses, (ii) general and administrative (“G&A”) expenses including salaries, bonuses, commissions and stock-based compensation, (iii) working capital requirements, (iv) business acquisitions and investments we may make from time to time, including potential performance based payments related to our acquisition of RFMi and a note payable issued in connection with our acquisition of GDSI, and (v) interest and principal payments related to our $44.0 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding convertible notes. Additionally, in the costs associatednear-term, the Company makes capital expenditures in connection with the Company’s second year of being a public reporting company, higher personnel costs for both R&D and administrative headcount, including increased costs for stock-based compensation, offset by the $1.7 million gain on bargain purchase price recorded due to the acquisitionexpansion of the STC-MEMS Business.capacity of its manufacturing facility in Canandaigua, New York.

 


LiquidityThe Company has incurred losses and Capital Resources

Financing Activities

We have earned minimal revenuenegative cash flow from operations since inception, and ourinception. Our operations thus far have been funded primarily with sales of equity and debt securities, as well as contract research and government grants, foundry services and engineering services. We expect our operating expenditures to continue to increase to support future growth of our manufacturing capabilities and expansion of our product offerings, as well as an increase in research and development and headcount costs to support this growth. We believe we currently have sufficient resources to fund operations and planned investments for at least the next twelve months from the date of filing of this Form 10-K. However, until we are able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to achieve and maintain profitability and meet our obligations as they come due, we may need to raise additional capital contributions, private placementsto support our business. We recently completed an offering of stock, grantsconvertible notes resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $43.7 million and debt.


On March 10, 2016, we held a closing of a private placementhave access to an at-the-market offering (the “March 2016 Offering”) inprogram pursuant to which we sold 494,125 sharesmay sell up to $50 million of our Common Stock to accredited investors at a fixed purchase price of $1.60 per share (the “2016 Offering Price”), for aggregate gross proceeds of $790,600 (before deducting expensesStock. As of the March 2016 Offering). On April 14, 2016, we held a closingdate of a private placement offering (the “April 2016 Offering,” and together with the March 2016 Offering, the “2016 Offering”) in which we sold 1,741,185 shares of our Common Stock at the “2016 Offering Price, for aggregate gross proceeds of $2.8 million (before deducting expenses of the April 2016 Offering).

With closings in each of November and December 2016 and January and February 2017,this Annual Report, the Company had sold a total of 2,142,000 shares$2.0 million of Common Stock under such at-the-market offering program and previously announced that it was suspending sales under the at-the-market offering program in a private placement offering (the “2016-2017 Offering”) at a fixed purchase pricelight of $5.00 per share (the “2016-2017 Offering Price”). Aggregate gross proceeds were $10.7 million (before deducting commissions and expenses ofmarket conditions. If, in the offering).

In May 2017,future, the Company held a closingdetermines to resume sales under the at-the-market offering program, it intends to notify investors by the filing of a private placement offering (the “2017 Offering”)Current Report on Form 8-K, other SEC filing or other public announcement. In January 2023, approximately $13.9 million in which it sold an aggregatecash was paid to the sellers in the GDSI acquisition as mentioned in Note 7 to the Financial Statements. Additionally, the Company estimates that approximately $4.0 million of 663,000 shares of Common Stock at a fixed purchase price of $9.00 per shareadditional cash is needed to accredited investors, for aggregate gross proceeds of $5,967,000 (before deducting commissions and expenses of the offering).complete construction in progress assets that are currently not in service.

 

Since inception through June 2017, we received $892,000 in funds from NSF/SBIR grants and NC matching funds.

The Company estimates the $6.7had $43.1 million of cash on hand as of September 8, 2017 will fundJune 30, 2023, which reflects a decrease of $37.4 million compared to $80.5 million as of June 30, 2022. The $37.4 million decrease is primarily due to $44.8 million of cash used in operating activities, cash used for purchases of machinery and equipment of $11.3 million and cash used for investment in subsidiary of $13.9 million. Partially offsetting these cash uses was cash proceeds from issuance of common stock of $32.0 million.

Financing Activities

On May 2, 2022, the Company entered into an ATM Sales Agreement with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, and Roth Capital Partners, LLC pursuant to which the Company may sell from time-to-time shares of its operations, includingcommon stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $50,000,000 (the “2022 Equity Offering Program”). The Company announced on May 25, 2022 that it was suspending sales under the 2022 Equity Offering Program in light of the current capital expense commitments throughmarket conditions. If, in the future, the Company determines to resume sales pursuant to the 2022 Equity Offering Program, it intends to notify investors by the filing of a Current Report on Form 8-K, other SEC filing or other public announcement. The Company did not make any sales of common stock under the Equity Offering Program in the year ended June 30, 2023.  

On June 9, 2022, the Company issued $44.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 6.0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2027 (the “Notes”) guaranteed by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Akoustis, Inc. The Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture (the “Indenture”), dated June 9, 2022, among the Company, the Guarantor and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. The Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.0% per year until maturity on June 15, 2027, payable semi-annually beginning on December 2017. As a result, we will need to obtain additional capital through the sale of additional equity securities, debt and additional grants, or otherwise, to fund operations past that date. There is no assurance that15, 2022. At the Company’s projections and estimates are accurate. Althoughoption, interest may be paid in cash and/or shares of the Company’s common stock. The initial conversion rate for the Notes is 212.3142 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment as provided in the Indenture) per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes, which is equal to an initial conversion price of approximately $4.71 per share.

On January 19, 2023, the Company is actively managingclosed an underwritten public offering of 12,545,454 shares of its common stock at a price to the public of $2.75 per share pursuant to an underwriting agreement with B. Riley Securities, Inc., as representative of the several underwriters named therein. The shares of common stock issued at closing included 1,636,363 shares issued pursuant to the underwriters’ over-allotment option, which was exercised in full. Gross proceeds totaled $34.5 million before deducting the underwriting discount and controllingoffering expenses of approximately $2.5 million resulting in net proceeds from the offering of approximately $32.0 million. Certain of the Company’s cash outflows to mitigate these risks, these matters raise substantial doubt aboutdirectors and officers participated in the Company’s ability to continueoffering by purchasing shares on the same terms and conditions as a going concern.other investors. 

 

Balance Sheet and Working Capital

 

June 30, 20172023 Compared to June 30, 20162022

 

As of June 30, 2017,2023, the Company had current assets of $10.0$59.8 million made up primarily of cash on hand of $9.6$43.1 million. As of June 30, 2016,2022, current assets were $4.3$91.7 million comprised primarily of cash on hand of $4.2$80.5 million. The $5.54 million increasereduction in cash year over yearcurrent assets was due to net proceeds from private placement offerings of $15.3 million offset by the cash expended for operations of $5.59 million and the investment in machinery and equipment of $1.6 million as well as the $2.8 million cash paid at the June 2017 closingprimarily a result of the acquisition for the STC-MEMS Business. The Company also saw a year over year increaseuse of cash in inventory of $145,000, mainly due to the purchase of inventory ($96,000) associated with the STC-MEMS acquisition, an increase in prepaid expenses of $103,000 due to the annual service fee payment for NASDAQ ($35,000) and new license fees for Cornell University for $45,000.operations.

 


Property, Plant and Equipment was $7.9$57.8 million as of June 30, 20172023 as compared to a balance of $207,000$51.2 million as of the year ended June 30, 2016.2022. The approximate $7.6$6.6 million year-over-year increase is primarily due to the purchase of equipment building and land acquired withfor the STC-MEMS Business (cumulative recorded valueNY Facility of $6.1 million)$13.2 million offset by depreciation of $9.2 million as well as an additional investmentassets acquired during the acquisition of $1.7 million in fixed assets, primarily equipment for research and development.GDSI amounting to $2.5 million.

 

Total assets as of June 30, 20172023 and June 30, 20162022 were $18.1$148.9 million and $4.5$161.3 million, respectively. The $12.4 million decrease is primarily due to a decrease in cash of $31.9 million which was partially offset by increases in property, plant and equipment as well as increase in intangible assets, including goodwill, related to the acquisition of GDSI.

 

Current liabilities as of June 30, 20172023 were $1.4$17.6 million and increased year-over-year by $816,000. We saw an increase$4.9 million which was primarily due to increases in accounts payable and accrued expenses, of $793,000primarily due mainly to the ramp up of both R&Dincreases in production activities and, administrative and support costs including additional personnel, material spend,employee compensation accruals and professional fees. fee accruals.

 

Long-term liabilities totaled $1.7$45.1 million as of June 30, 2017,2023, compared to $1.3$45.5 million for the prior year period. The increase of $408,000This decrease was due to the decrease in the derivative liability recorded for warrants issued to placement agents in connection with private placements in 2015 and the 2016 Offering. During December 2016 and January 2017, the Company amended these warrant agreements to eliminate the derivative feature, and as a result theof decreases in derivative and contingent liability was fully reclassed to stockholder’s equity in the year ended June 30, 2017. This decrease in long-term liability wasvaluations offset by an increase of $1.7 million, which was a long-term contingent real estate liability associated with the acquisition of the STC-MEMS Business that closed on June 26, 2017.increases promissory notes payable.

 


Stockholders’ equity was $15.0$86.2 million as of June 30, 2017,2023, compared to $2.7$103.4 million as of June 30, 2016.

2022. Additional paid-in-capital (“APIC”) was $30.8$356.5 million as of June 30, 20172023 and increased by $21.4 million.$46.4 million compared to June 30, 2022. The year-over-year increase was primarily due to: (1)to an increase from net proceeds of $15.4$32.0 million for the issuance of Common Stockcommon stock during the year, common stock issued for services in the 2016-2017 Offeringamount of $9.4 million, and the 2017 Offering, less $992,000common stock issued for the fair valueacquisition of warrants issued to placement agents for a totalsubsidiary of 291,000 shares$1.7 million. The $17.2 million decrease in stockholders’ equity consisted of Common Stock, (2) increase of $4.8 million of APIC recorded due to the vesting of restricted stock agreements granted to employees and contractors in lieu of cash compensation, and (3) an increase due to the release of derivative liabilities associated with warrants issued in 2015 and 2016 offering for $2.2 million after the warrant agreements were amended to eliminate the derivative feature in December and January 2017. The $21.4$46.4 million increase in stockholder’s equity wasAPIC reduced by the $9.1$63.6 million net loss recorded for the year ended June 30, 2017.2023.

 

Working capital as of June 30, 2017 was $8.7 million, compared to $3.7 million as of June 30, 2016.

Cash Flow Analysis

 

Year Ended June 30, 20172023 Compared to the Year Ended June 30, 20162022

Operating Activities

 

OperatingNet cash used in operating activities used cash of $5.5was $44.8 million during the year ended June 30, 20172023 and $3.3$45.2 million for the 20162022 comparative period. The $2.2$0.4 million year-over-year increasedecrease in cash used was attributable to an increase in revenue partially offset by higher operating expenses associated with the ramp up of development and commercialization activities, (primarily R&D personnel and material costs), higher spend on G&A costs for support personnel, and professional fees.

 

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities used cash of $4.5was $25.1 million for the year ended June 30, 20172023 compared to $204,000$34.9 million for the comparative year ended June 30, 2016.2022. The $9.8 million year-over-year increasedecrease was primarily due to the $2.8 million cash paid at closing for the acquisition of the STC-MEMS Business, as well as increaseddecreased spend on R&D and manufacturing equipment (higherof $16.3 million offset by $1.5 million).a $6.3 million increase in cash used for investment in a subsidiary.

 

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities provided cash of $15.6was $32.6 million for the year ended June 30, 20172023 versus $3.3$72.3 million for the 20162022 comparative period. The $12.3$39.7 million decrease was due to a decrease in proceeds from convertible debt of $43.7 million compared to the prior period, offset by an increase wasin proceeds from funds raised in the 2016-2017 Offering and the 2017 Offering.issuance of common stock of $4.4 million.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

The Company did not engage in any “off-balance sheet arrangements” (as that term is defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K) as of June 30, 2017.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

 

Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.


ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

Our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016 are included beginning on Page F-1 immediately following the signature page to this Report. See Item 15 for a list of the financial statements included herein.

ITEM 9.           CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

 


ITEM 9A.        CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that is designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2017. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of such date due to the material weakness described below with respect to our internal control over financial reporting.INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2017. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013). Based on that evaluation under this framework, our management concluded that our internal control over  financial reporting was not effective.

During its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, management identified a material weakness in the design of controls over it acquisition accounting and reporting practices as it relates to the acquisition of the STC-MEMS Business.  The effectiveness of controls surrounding the acquisition accounting processing, review of external advisors work and subsequent compilation and reporting has the potential, when taken together, to represent a more than remote likelihood that a material misstatement could occur and not be prevented or detected.   Therefore, management has determined this has risen to the level of a material weakness.   To remediate this material weakness, management intends to increase the size and capabilities of its accounting department and place less reliance on external consultants.

Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness as to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Further, because of changes in conditions, effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting may vary over time. Our system contains self-monitoring mechanisms, and actions are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified.

This Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company (as a smaller reporting company) to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Except for the material weakness described above, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.        OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10.         DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors and Executive Officers

Below are the names of, and certain information regarding, our current executive officers and directors.

NameAgePositionDate Named to Board
of Directors/as
Executive Officer
Arthur E. Geiss64Co-Chairman of the BoardMay 22, 2015
Jerry D. Neal73Co-Chairman of the BoardMay 22, 2015
Jeffrey B. Shealy48President and Chief Executive Officer; DirectorMay 22, 2015
John T. Kurtzweil61Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting OfficerJuly 14, 2017
David M. Aichele51Vice President of Business DevelopmentMay 22, 2015
Cindy C. Payne57Vice President of Finance, Corporate Controller, and TreasurerMay 22, 2015
Steven P. DenBaars55DirectorMay 22, 2015
Jeffrey K. McMahon46DirectorMay 22, 2015
Steven P. Miller69DirectorJuly 14, 2017
Suzanne B. Rudy62DirectorJuly 14, 2017

 


Directors are elected to serve until their successors are elected and qualified. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the meeting of stockholders at which they are elected and hold office until the expiration of the term for which he or she was elected or until a successor has been elected and qualified.

A majority of the authorized number of directors constitutes a quorum of the Board of Directors for the transaction of business. The directors must be present at the meeting to constitute a quorum. However, any action required or permitted to be taken by the Board of Directors may be taken without a meeting if all members of the Board of Directors individually or collectively consent in writing to the action.

Executive officers are appointed by the Board of Directors and serve at its pleasure.

The principal occupation and business experience during the past five years for our executive officers and directors is as follows:

Arthur E. Geiss, Co-Chairman of the Board, founded AEG Consulting, LLC in 2003 and currently serves as its Owner and CEO. AEG Consulting offers guidance concerning manufacturing, operations, and process development to technology companies. Prior to establishing AEG Consulting, Mr. Geiss served as Vice President of Wafer Fab Operations at RF Micro Devices, Inc. (“RFMD”) (now Qorvo, Inc.). He was responsible for the start-up and operations of Gallium Arsenide epitaxial-growth and wafer-fabrication. Previous to RFMD, Mr. Geiss held management positions with Alpha Industries, Inc. (purchased by Skyworks Solutions, Inc.) and before that at ITT Gallium Arsenide Technology Center (purchased by Cobham plc). At both companies, he was responsible for process and device development and wafer fabrication operations. Prior to these, Mr. Geiss held a research position at the Xerox Palo Alto Research Center (now PARC, Inc.). At PARC he investigated the structure of vitreous materials and amorphous thin-films using Raman spectroscopy. Mr. Geiss has served as a Member of the Executive Committee of the IEEE GaAs IC Symposium (now CSICS) and as a Member of the Executive Committee of the GaAs Manufacturing Technology Conference (now CS Mantech). He has numerous patents and publications on electronic devices, processing, and manufacturing. Mr. Geiss earned a B.S. degree at Lafayette College and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees at Brown University, all in physics. We believe that Mr. Geiss adds value to our Board of Directors based on his extensive experience with technology companies, his executive leadership and management experience and his research background.

Jerry D. Neal, Co-Chairman of the Board, founded RFMD (now, Qorvo, Inc.) in 1991 and served as its Executive Vice President of Marketing and Strategic Development from January 2002 to May 31, 2012. Dr. Neal served as a Vice President of Marketing of RFMD, from May 1991 to January 2000 and its Executive Vice President of Sales, Marketing and Strategic Development from January 2000 to January 2002. Prior to joining RFMD, he was employed for 10 years with Analog Devices, Inc., including as Marketing Engineer, Marketing Manager and Business Development Manager. Dr. Neal also founded Moisture Control Systems for the production of his patented electronic sensor for measurement of soil moisture for research, which was later sold to Hancor, Inc. He has been a Director of Jazz Semiconductor, Inc. since November 2002. Dr. Neal served as a Director of RFMD from February 1992 to July 1993. He also held various positions at Hewlett-Packard. Dr. Neal received his Associate’s Degree in Electrical Engineering from Gaston Technical Institute and North Carolina State University and his doctor of business management degree from Southern Wesleyan University. We believe that Dr. Neal adds value to our Board of Directors based on his extensive executive leadership and management experience and his sales, marketing and product development background.


Jeffrey B. Shealy is our President and Chief Executive Officer, as well as one of our directors. He has over 20 years of experience in the RF/Wireless industry focused on building businesses around solid-state materials and electron device innovation. He held the position of Vice President and General Manager at RFMD from 2001 until 2014. Mr. Shealy is a Howard Hughes Doctoral Fellow and spent 7 years with Hughes Electronics at Hughes Research Labs (now HRL Labs) and Hughes Network Systems (now Hughes). He previously founded RF Nitro, a RF Power Amplifier high-tech venture, which was acquired by RFMD in 2001. Mr. Shealy holds an MBA degree from Wake Forest University, Master of Science and Doctorate degrees in Electrical and Computer Engineering from University of California at Santa Barbara (UCSB), and a Bachelor’s of Science degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from North Carolina State University (NCSU). We believe that Mr. Shealy adds value to our Board of Directors based on his intimate knowledge of our business plans and strategies, his experience with high tech startup ventures and his years of experience in the RF/Wireless industry.

John T. Kurtzweil, has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer since July 14, 2017, and he served as a director on the Board from January 12, 2017 to July 14, 2017. He served as VP Finance of Cree, Inc., a company that develops, manufactures, and sells lighting-class light emitting diode, lighting, and semiconductor products for power and radio-frequency applications, and Chief Financial Officer of Wolfspeed, a Cree Company, from 2015 until March 2017. He is currently providing consulting services to a limited number of businesses. Prior to his employment at Cree, Mr. Kurtzweil was an independent consultant beginning in 2014. From 2012 until 2014, Mr. Kurtzweil served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Special Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer of Extreme Networks, Inc., a provider of high-performance, open networking innovations for enterprises, services providers, and Internet exchanges, and also served as its Chief Accounting Officer. From 2006 to 2012, Mr. Kurtzweil served as Executive Vice President, Finance and as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Cree, Inc. From 2004 to 2006, Mr. Kurtzweil was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Cirrus Logic, Inc., a fabless semiconductor company. Mr. Kurtzweil currently serves as a director of Axcelis Technology, Inc., and was appointed Chairman of its Audit Committee in February 2017. Mr. Kurtzweil served as a board member for Meru Networks, Inc. for a portion of 2015 prior to its sale.

David M. Aichele is Vice President of Business Development responsible for leading the sales and marketing efforts of the Company. Mr. Aichele joined the company in May 2015, bringing over 20 years of international sales, business development, and marketing experience with him. Prior to Akoustis, Mr. Aichele was EVP Sales & Marketing for T1Visions, a high-tech software startup company ranking among the 2014 INC 500 fastest growing private companies in the U.S from 2013 to May 2015. Mr. Aichele held director positions at RFMD from 2005 to 2015, where he was responsible for the business development and launch of new RF semiconductor products targeting the cellular market, and senior management positions at Tessera and TE Connectivity, where he led business development and sales teams. Mr. Aichele holds a BSEE from Ohio University and an MBA from the Leeds School of Business at the University of Colorado.

Cindy C. Paynehas served as our Vice President of Finance, Corporate Controller, and Treasurer since July 14, 2017. Ms. Payne previously served as our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from 2015 to July 14, 2017. Ms. Payne brings to the Company over 20 years of experience in financial management. Prior to joining Akoustis, Ms. Payne most recently served as the CFO for Amerock LLC from 2014-2015, a private equity owned hardware distributor in Mooresville, NC. Prior to joining Amerock, Ms. Payne held the position of CFO for Tolt Service Group, a private equity owned technology services provider, from 2010 until the company’s sale in 2014. Her experience prior to Tolt included the role of Director of Financial Planning and Analysis in the Soft Trim Division of International Automotive Components, a Tier I supplier to the automotive industry and the role of Controller of NewBold Corporation. NewBold Corporation, located in the Roanoke, Virginia area, offers both manufactured products and technology services to retail and healthcare markets. Ms. Payne graduated Magna Cum Laude from Western Carolina University with a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration and is a Certified Public Accountant, licensed in the Commonwealth of Virginia.


Steven P. DenBaars is a Professor of Materials and Co-Director of the Solid-State Lighting Center at University of California at Santa Barbara. Professor DenBaars joined UCSB in 1991 and currently holds the Mitsubishi Chemical Chair in Solid State Lighting and Displays. He is also a co-founder and current board member of two privately held GaN startup companies, Soraa Inc. and Soraa Laser Inc. Dr. DenBaars has been in the LED business for over 25 years starting with his prior work at Hewlett-Packard Optoelectronics division in 1988 and involvement in more than two LED companies and one laser diode company. Professor DenBaars’ specific research interests include growth of wide-band gap semiconductors (GaN based), and their application to Blue LEDs and lasers and energy efficient solid-state lighting. This research has led to over 750 scientific publications and over 160 U.S. patents on electronic materials and devices. He has been awarded a NSF Young Investigator award, Young Scientist Award of the ISCS, IEEE Aron Kressel Award, and he is an IEEE Fellow and a Visiting Professor at the Institute for Advanced Studies (IAS) HKUST. He was recently elected to the National Academy of Engineering (2012), and elected Fellow of the National Academy of Inventors (2014). We believe that Professor DenBaars adds value to our Board of Directors based on his years of experience in the LED industry and his extensive research involving wide-based gap semiconductors and their application to high power electronic devices.

Jeffrey K. McMahon has been employed by North Highland, a global management consulting firm, since 2003. He has held the position of Managing Director since 2014 and is the current Market Lead for North Highland’s largest market. He has an extensive background in business and information technology consulting in the financial services, energy, and telecommunications industries. He has 20 years of experience helping Fortune 100 companies drive revenue, optimize processes, improve customer experience and manage risk. His areas of expertise include marketing, strategy articulation and realization, strategic execution, business process management and merger integration. Prior to joining North Highland, Mr. McMahon was a Manager in Accenture’s process practice area. Mr. McMahon received a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from North Carolina State University. We believe that Mr. McMahon adds value to our Board of Directors based on his extensive experience in business and technology consulting and his marketing and strategizing expertise.

Steven P. Miller served as a Board Advisor to the Board from January 2017 to June 2017. He is the President of Via Capri Inc., the general partner of Via Capri Investment L.P., a limited partnership formed by Mr. Miller in 1996. Mr. Miller is also the President of Sawmill Inc., the general partner of Sawmill Investment L.P., another limited partnership formed by Mr. Miller in 1996. From 2001 to 2003, Mr. Miller served as a director for TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. (TriQuint), then a leading supplier of high-performance components and modules for communications applications before merging with RFMD to form Qorvo, Inc. in 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Miller held several positions at Sawtek Inc. from 1979 until his retirement in 1999, including Co-Founder, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of Sawtek’s Board of Directors. Sawtek Inc. merged with TriQuint in 2001. Prior to co-founding Sawtek Inc. in 1979, Mr. Miller was Manager of the SAW Development Laboratory in the Defense Group at Texas Instruments Incorporated. Mr. Miller brings to the Board familiarity with the Company, its operations, finances, and strategic plan through his experience as a Board Advisor, as well as industry expertise, public company leadership experience, and his experience and skills in strategic growth and business development, including capital formation.

Suzanne Rudymost recently served as Vice President of Tax & Corporate Treasurer, Compliance Officer and Assistant Secretary of Qorvo, Inc., a publicly-traded company and leading supplier of semiconductor solutions for the wireless communications market, until November 2015. In addition to her treasury and compliance duties, Ms. Rudy served as a director for various subsidiaries of Qorvo, Inc. Prior to joining Qorvo, Inc. predecessor, RMFD, in 1999, Ms. Rudy was the Controller for Precision Fabrics Group, Inc., a textile spin-off of the Fortune 500 Company, Burlington Industries. In addition, she spent six years as a Certified Public Accountant and Manager for BDO Seidman, LLP, an international accounting firm. From 2012 to 2016, Ms. Rudy served as a director for Delta Apparel, Inc., a publicly-traded apparel manufacturer, where she served on the Audit and Compensation Committees. From 2008 to 2011, Ms. Rudy served as a director for First National Bank United Corporation, serving as Chair of the Audit Committee and the Assets and Liability Committee. Since 2006, Ms. Rudy has served on the Board of Visitors for Guilford College. She was also a Board Leadership Fellow in 2013, as designated by the National Association of Corporate Directors. Ms. Rudy brings to our Board extensive expertise in public company financial, compliance, and related strategic matters.


Director Independence

Our Board has determined that Ms. Rudy and Messrs. Geiss, Neal, DenBaars, McMahon, and Miller are independent directors under the applicable standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market. In reaching this determination, the Board considered Mr. Geiss’ relationship with AEG Consulting, a firm owned and operated by Mr. Geiss, which provides consulting services to the Company, as discussed below under “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions.” After consideration, the Board determined that this relationship did not impact Mr. Geiss’ ability to serve as an independent director.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our directors or executive officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

None of our directors or executive officers has been involved in any of the following events, or any of the other events specified in Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K, during the past ten years:

any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his or her involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or

being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.

Board Committees

The Board maintains three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating Committee. Each committee operates under a written charter and reports regularly to the Board. A copy of each of these committee charters is available in the “Investors” section of our website under the heading “Governance Documents” at http://www.akoustis.com and may also be obtained by submitting the “Contact Us” form at the website address set forth above. Each member of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating Committee must satisfy membership requirements imposed by the applicable committee charter and, where applicable, NASDAQ listing standards and SEC rules and regulations. Each of the members of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating Committee has been determined by the Board to be independent under applicable NASDAQ listing standards and, in the case of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee, under the independence requirements established by the SEC. A brief description of the responsibilities of each of these committees and their current membership follows.

Audit Committee 

The Audit Committee is a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board to assist the Board in its duty to oversee our accounting, financial reporting and internal control functions and the audit of our financial statements. The current members of the Audit Committee are Suzanne Rudy (Chair), Jerry Neal and Jeffrey McMahon, each of whom is independent under existing NASDAQ listing standards and SEC requirements. The Board has examined the SEC’s definition of “audit committee financial expert” and determined that Ms. Rudy is an audit committee financial expert.


Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is appointed by the Board to assist the Board in overseeing and reviewing information from management regarding compensation and human capital issues within the Company. The Compensation Committee also has specific responsibilities regarding performance reviews and compensation of the Company’s executive officers. The Compensation Committee regularly consults with members of our executive management team regarding our executive compensation program. The current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. McMahon (Chairman) and Neal and Ms. Rudy, each of whom is independent under existing NASDAQ listing standards, SEC requirements, and the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

Nominating Committee

The Nominating Committee is appointed by the Board to assist the Board in identifying individuals qualified to become Board and committee members and to recommend to the Board director nominees. The current members of the Nominating Committee are Messrs. Neal (Chairman) and DenBaars and Ms. Rudy.

Other Committees

Our Board of Directors may designate from among its members one or more other committees in the future, and in July 2017, our Board designated a Technology Committee to assist the Board and the Company’s senior management in overseeing technology development initiatives and to advise the Board regarding new technology development and execution of technology initiatives. The current members of the Technology Committee are Messrs. Geiss, DenBaars, and Miller.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. McMahon (Chairman) and Neal and Ms. Rudy. Mr. Geiss also served as a member of the Compensation Committee for a portion of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017. No member of the Compensation Committee has ever served as an officer or employee of Akoustis or had any relationship during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K, other than consulting fees paid to AEG Consulting, LLC, Mr. Geiss’ consulting firm. No executive officer of the Company has served as a director or member of the Compensation Committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any other entity, one of whose executive officers served as director of the Company during the year ended June 30, 2017.

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics and Conduct that applies to our directors, officers, and employees. A copy of the Code of Ethics and Conduct is posted on the Company’s website at www.akoustis.com. In the event that we amend any of the provisions of the Code of Ethics and Conduct that requires disclosure under applicable law or SEC rules, we intend to disclose such amendment on our website. Any waiver of the Code of Ethics and Conduct must be approved by the Board of Directors. Any waivers granted to our CEO or CFO will be disclosed on our website within four business days.

Stockholder Communications with the Board

Stockholders may communicate with the Board of Directors, members of particular committees or individual directors, by sending a letter to such persons in care of our Chief Executive Officer at our principal executive offices. The Chief Executive Officer has the authority to disregard any inappropriate communications or to take other appropriate actions with respect to any inappropriate communications. If deemed an appropriate communication, the Chief Executive Officer will submit the correspondence to the Chairman of the Board or to any committee or specific director to whom the correspondence is directed. Please note that all such communications must be accompanied by a statement of the type and amount of our securities that the person holds; any special interest, meaning an interest that is not derived from the proponent’s capacity as a shareholder, of the person in the subject matter of the communication; and the address, telephone number and e-mail address, if any, of the person submitting the communication.


Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16 of the Exchange Act requires the directors, certain officers, and beneficial owners of more than 10% of a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act to file reports with the SEC indicating their holdings of and transactions in such securities and to provide copies of such reports to the issuer of such securities.Based solely upon a review of the copies of the reports furnished to the Company, the Company believes all such reporting persons complied with such reporting obligations during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, except for a Form 3 filed on March 13, 2017 by Mark N. Tompkins.

ITEM 11.         EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

On August 11, 2016, we changed our fiscal year from a fiscal year ending on March 31 of each year to a fiscal year ending on June 30 of each year, effective for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017. Accordingly, the following table sets forth information concerning the total compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our named executive officers during (i) the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017; (ii) the three-month transition period (“TP”) from April 1, 2016 to June 30, 2016; and (iii) the year ended March 31, 2016 (our prior fiscal year).

Name and Principal
Position
 Fiscal
Year
 Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
($) (3)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
  Total
($)
 
                  
Jeffrey Shealy, 

2017 (1) 

TP 2016 

  

154,327 

42,484 

   

92,700

   

151,200

   

 9,801

2,815

   

407,938

45,299 

 
CEO 2016 (2)  150,000   30,000      5,077   185,077 
                       
Mark Boomgarden, 

2017 (1) 

TP 2016 

  139,923
36,615
   

42,024

   

84,000

   6,631
2,009
   272,578
38,624
 
VP of Operations (5) 2016 (2)  117,692   13,600   67,450   17,653   216,395 
                       
Cindy Payne, 

2017 (1) 

TP 2016 

  149,183
39,038
   

44,805

   

126,000

   7,760
2,113
   327,748
41,151
 
VP of Finance (6) 2016 (2)  114,327   13,775   217,500   4,462   350,064 
                       
Dave Aichele,                      
VP of Business 

2017 (1) 

TP 2016 

  139,923
37,143
   

42,024

   

84,000

   7,278
2,009
   273,225
39,152
 
Development 2016 (2)  121,876   13,600   165,000   4,603   305,079 

(1)Bonus amount reflected for FY 2017 was earned during the bonus period of April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2017 but paid in May 2017.

(2)Bonus amount reflected for FY 2016 was earned during the bonus period of April 1, 2015 to March 31, 2016 but paid in May 2016.


(3)See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report for a discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation of stock awards.
(4)Other compensation is presented by each executive below:

  Fiscal
Year
  401K
Contribution
($) (a)
 Contractor Compensation Total ($) 
           
Jeffrey Shealy, 2017
TP 2016
  9,801
2,815
   9,801
2,815
 
CEO 2016  5,077   5,077 
           
Mark Boomgarden, 2017
TP 2016
  6,631
2,009
   6,631
2,009
 
VP of Operations 2016  4,603 13,050 17,653 
           
Cindy Payne, 

2017

TP 2016

  7,760
2,113
   7,760
2,113
 
VP Finance 2016  4,462   4,462 
           
David Aichele,
VP of Business
 2017
TP 2016
  7,278
2,009
   7,278
2,009
 
Development 2016  4,603   4,603 

(a)Effective June 1, 2015, we established a 401(k)-retirement savings plan, with an employer matching contribution, for all employees. We have no other plans in place and have never maintained any other plans that provide for the payment of retirement benefits or benefits that will be paid primarily following retirement including, but not limited to, tax qualified deferred benefit plans, supplemental executive retirement plans, tax-qualified deferred contribution plans and nonqualified deferred contribution plans.

(5)Mr. Boomgarden served as our Vice President of Operations until his resignation, effective September 15, 2017.

(6)Ms. Payne served as our Chief Financial Officer until July 14, 2017 when she voluntarily resigned and transitioned into the position of Vice President of Finance.  Effective July 14, 2017, John T. Kurtzweil now serves as our Chief Financial Officer.

Except as indicated below under “Employment Agreements,” we have no contracts, agreements, plans or arrangements, whether written or unwritten, that provide for payments to the named executive officers listed above.


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2017 Year-End

We have equity awards outstanding under three compensation plans approved by our stockholders: the 2014 Stock Plan, the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”) and the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan). However, no further grants will be made under the 2014 Plan or the 2015 Plan. The following table provides information about outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of June 30, 2017.

    Stock Awards
Name Grant Date (1) Number of shares or
units of stock that have
not vested (#)
 Market value of shares
or units of stock that
have not vested ($) (2)
       
Jeffrey Shealy, CEO 8/11/2016 (3) 36,000 314,640
       
Mark Boomgarden, VP of Operations (5) 6/16/2014 (4) 16,204 141,623
    9/9/2014 (4) 72,918 637,303
  10/5/2015 (3) 38,000 332,120
  8/11/2016 (3) 20,000 174,800
       
Cindy Payne, VP of Finance (6) 10/5/2015 (3) 145,000 1,267,300
  8/11/2016 (3) 30,000 262,200
       
David Aichele, VP of Business Development 10/5/2015 (3) 110,000 961,400
  8/11/2016 (3) 20,000 174,800

(1)The grant date is determined in accordance with Topic 718.
(2)Based upon the $8.74 closing price of our Common Stock, as reported by NASDAQ on June 30, 2017, multiplied by the number of shares that had not yet vested.
(3)The shares granted on this date are subject to a repurchase option by the Company if the named executive officer’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company without cause, by the named executive officer for good reason, or upon the named executive officer’s permanent disability.  The shares will be released from the repurchase option as follows:  50% on the second anniversary of the grant date and 25% on each of the third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
(4)The shares granted on this date are subject to a repurchase option by the Company if the named executive officer’s employment with the Company is terminated for any reason. The remaining unvested shares will be released from the repurchase option as follows: sufficient shares such that an aggregate 75% of the original shares granted shall have vested on the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 25% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date.
(5)Mr. Boomgarden served as our Vice President of Operations until his resignation, effective September 15, 2017.
(6)Ms. Payne served as our Chief Financial Officer until July 14, 2017 when she voluntarily resigned and transitioned into the position of Vice President of Finance.  Effective July 14, 2017, John T. Kurtzweil now serves as our Chief Financial Officer.

Employment Agreements

Jeffrey B. Shealy

On June 15, 2015, we entered into a three-year employment agreement with our Chief Executive Officer, Jeffrey B. Shealy. After the initial three-year term, the agreement will be automatically renewed for successive one-year periods unless terminated by either party on at least 30 days’ written notice prior to the end of the then-current term. Mr. Shealy’s annual base salary was $150,000, subject to increase or decrease annually as determined by our Board of Directors. Effective July 4, 2016 the Board increased Mr. Shealy’s salary to $154,500. Mr. Shealy’s base salary was further increased to $163,770, effective September 11, 2017. Mr. Shealy is eligible, at the discretion of our Board of Directors, to receive an annual cash bonus of up to 100% of his annual base salary, which may be based on us achieving certain operational, financial or other milestones (the “Milestones”) that may be established by our Board of Directors. Mr. Shealy is entitled to receive stock options or other equity incentive awards under the 2016 Plan as and when determined by the Board, and is entitled to receive perquisites and other fringe benefits that may be provided to, and is eligible to participate in any other bonus or incentive program established by us for, our executives. Mr. Shealy and his dependents are also entitled to participate in any of our employee benefit plans subject to the same terms and conditions applicable to other employees. Mr. Shealy will be entitled to be reimbursed for all reasonable travel, entertainment and other expenses incurred or paid by him in connection with, or related to, the performance of his duties, responsibilities or services under his employment agreement, in accordance with policies and procedures, and subject to limitations, adopted by us from time to time.


In the event that Mr. Shealy is terminated by us without Cause (as defined in his employment agreement) or he resigns for Good Reason (as defined in his employment agreement) during the term of his employment, Mr. Shealy would be entitled to (x) an amount equal to his annual base salary then in effect (payable in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices) for a period of 24 months commencing on the effective date of his termination (the “Severance Period”) (in the case of termination by the executive for Good Reason, reduced by any cash remuneration paid to him because of any other employment or self-employment during the Severance Period), (y) if and to the extent the Milestones are achieved for the annual bonus for the year in which the Severance Period commences (or, in the absence of Milestones, our Board of Directors has, in its sole discretion, otherwise determined an amount of Mr. Shealy’s annual bonus for such year), an amount equal to such annual bonus pro-rated for the portion of the performance year completed before Mr. Shealy’s employment terminated, and (z) any unvested stock options, restricted stock or similar incentive equity instruments will vest immediately. For the duration of the Severance Period, Mr. Shealy will also be eligible to participate in our benefit plans or programs, provided Mr. Shealy was participating in such plan or program immediately prior to the date of employment termination, to the extent permitted under the terms of such plan or program (collectively, the “Termination Benefits”). If Mr. Shealy’s employment is terminated during the term by us for Cause, by Mr. Shealy for any reason other than Good Reason or due to his death, then he will not be entitled to receive the Termination Benefits, and shall only be entitled to the compensation and benefits that shall have accrued as of the date of such termination (other than with respect to certain benefits that may be available to Mr. Shealy as a result of a Permanent Disability (as defined in his employment agreement)).

John T. Kurtzweil

On July 14, 2017, the Board named John T. Kurtzweil as our new Chief Financial Officer who would also serve as the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer, effective as of the same day. In connection with the election of the new Chief Financial Officer of the Company, the Company entered into an employment agreement, dated July 14, 2017 (the “CFO Agreement”), with the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to which Mr. Kurtzweil will receive an annual base salary of $151,000, monthly living expenses of $1,600, three weeks of paid vacation each year, and reimbursement of all reasonable business, promotional, travel, and entertainment expenses incurred in the performance of his duties. In addition, Mr. Kurtzweil is also eligible to earn a target annual bonus each fiscal year equal to 70% of his annual base salary, based on certain Company operation, financial, and other milestones set by the Board and/or its Compensation Committee. Mr. Kurtzweil is also entitled to participate in any employee benefit plans and programs generally provided by the Company to its senior executives from time to time. In addition, as an inducement to employment, Mr. Kurtzweil will receive a restricted stock award for 100,000 shares of Common Stock and options for 75,000 shares of Common Stock during the Company’s next open trading window. These awards will be granted under the 2016 Plan and will vest 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date, subject to Mr. Kurtzweil’s continued employment and the terms and conditions of the 2016 Plan and the applicable award agreements.

The term of the CFO Agreement extends through July 31, 2018, and the CFO Agreement will automatically renew for successive one-year periods unless either party gives at least 30 days written notice of non-renewal to the other party prior to the end of the then applicable term.


If Mr. Kurtzweil’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. Kurtzweil for “good reason” (each as defined in the CFO Agreement), Mr. Kurtzweil will be entitled to receive: (1) continued payment of his base salary, payable in bi-weekly installments, for 12 months; (2) his annual bonus for the preceding year, if and to the extent earned and not already paid; (3) any other compensation and benefits accrued through the date of termination; and (4) reimbursement for one year after the date of termination for the cost of committed living allowance expenses and any COBRA continuation of health coverage if he elects such coverage. Any unvested stock options, restricted stock awards, or other equity awards granted by the Company to Mr. Kurtzweil will vest or be forfeited in accordance with the terms of the applicable award agreement(s).

If Mr. Kurtzweil’s employment is terminated due to his death or “disability” (as defined in the CFO Agreement), if the Company terminates Mr. Kurtzweil’s employment for “cause,” or if Mr. Kurtzweil voluntarily terminates his employment without “good reason,” Mr. Kurtzweil, his designated beneficiary, or his estate, as applicable, will be entitled to receive his base salary accrued through the date of termination. In the case of termination due to “disability” or Mr. Kurtzweil’s voluntary termination of employment, he will also be entitled to receive his annual bonus for the preceding year, if and to the extent earned and not already paid. Any unvested stock options, restricted stock awards, or other equity awards granted by the Company to Mr. Kurtzweil will vest or be forfeited in accordance with the terms of the applicable award agreement(s).

Other

On June 15, 2015, the Company also entered into two-year employment agreements with each of the Vice President of Business Development, the Vice President of Operations, and the then Chief Financial Officer. Each of these employment agreements had substantially the same terms as that of the CEO described above. These agreements expired on June 15, 2017, and each of these officers continue to serve in their respective positions, with the exception of Ms. Payne who now serves as Vice President of Finance, effective upon her voluntary resignation from the Chief Financial Officer position on July 14, 2017.

Each named executive officer’s salary is subject to increase or decrease annually as determined by our Board of Directors. Effective June 15, 2017 the Board increased the salaries of Mr. Aichele, Mr. Boomgarden and Ms. Payne to $141,080, $141,080 and $150,350, respectively. Effective September 11, 2017, Mr. Aichele’s and Ms. Payne’s base salaries were increased to $148,134 and $154,860.50, respectively.

Change in Control Arrangements

2015 Plan

In the event of a merger or change in control of the Company, the treatment of each outstanding restricted stock award granted under the 2015 Plan will be determined by the administrator of the 2015 Plan, including whether each such award will be assumed or an equivalent option or right substituted by the successor corporation. The administrator will not be required to treat all awards similarly in the transaction. In the event that the successor corporation does not assume or substitute the awards, all restrictions on the awards will lapse.

2016 Plan

Under the terms of the 2016 Plan, the following provisions will apply to the restricted stock awards granted under the 2016 Plan in the event of a change of control (except to the extent, if any, otherwise required under Code Section 409A):

To the extent that the successor or surviving company in the change of control event does not assume or substitute for an award (or in which the Company is the ultimate parent corporation and does not continue the award) on substantially similar terms or with substantially equivalent economic benefits as awards outstanding under the 2016 Plan (as determined by the administrator of the 2016 Plan), any restrictions will be deemed to have been met, and such awards will become fully vested, earned and payable to the fullest extent of the original grant of the applicable award.


 In addition, in the event that an award is substituted, assumed or continued, the award will become vested in full and any restrictions will be deemed to have been met and such awards will become fully vested, earned and payable to the fullest extent of the original award, if the employment or service of the participant is terminated within two years after the effective date of a change of control if such termination of employment or service (i) is by the Company without cause or (ii) is by the participant for good reason.

Further, if a named executive officer has entered into an employment agreement or other similar arrangement as of the effective date of the 2016 Plan, the officer is entitled to the greater of the benefits provided upon a change of control of the Company under the 2016 Plan or the respective employment agreement or other similar arrangement as in effect on the 2016 Plan’s effective date, and such employment agreement or other similar arrangement will not be construed to reduce in any way the benefits otherwise provided to the officer upon a change of control as defined in the 2016 Plan.

Director Compensation

We do not have a formal director compensation program, and our directors have historically received compensation at the discretion of the Board in the form of equity awards granted under the 2015 Plan and the 2016 Plan. We also reimburse our directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses related to their role on our Board. We intend for our director compensation to align the interests of our non-employee directors with the interests of our stockholders and plan to implement a formal director compensation program for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018.

The table below summarizes all compensation received by each of the Company’s non-employee directors for services as a director performed during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.

Name Stock
awards
($)(1)
  All other compensation
($)
  Total
($)
 
          
Arthur E. Geiss (1)(2)  92,400   16,995   109,395 
             
Jerry D. Neal (1)  92,400      92,400 
             
Steven P. DenBaars (1)  92,400      92,400 
             
Jeffrey K. McMahon (1)  92,400      92,400 
             
John Kurtzweil (3)  126,500      126,500 

(1)Messrs. Geiss, Neal, DenBaars and McMahon each received a restricted stock grant under the 2015 Plan for 22,000 shares of Common Stock for Board service on August 11, 2016, with 50% of such shares scheduled to vest on the second anniversary of the grant date and 25% of such shares to vest on each of the third and fourth anniversaries of the grant dates. Valuation is based on the closing bid price of $4.20 on the grant date.Page
(2)Mr. Geiss received $15,195 in compensation for consulting services provided by his consulting firm, AEG Consulting, for the year ended June 30, 2017.
(3)Mr. Kurtzweil received a restricted stock grant under the 2016 Plan for 22,000 shares of common stock for Board service effective January 25, 2017, with 25% of such shares scheduled to vest on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date. The grant is valued at the closing bid price of $5.65 on the grant date. Mr. Kurtzweil resigned from the Board of Directors on July 14, 2017 in connection with his transition to the role of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. His restricted stock award will continue to vest on schedule.  


ITEM 12.        SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. In accordance with SEC rules, shares of our Common Stock that may be acquired upon exercise of stock options or warrants that are currently exercisable or that become exercisable within 60 days after September 8, 2017 (the “Determination Date”) are deemed beneficially owned by the holders of such options and warrants and are deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of any other person. Subject to community property laws, where applicable, the persons or entities named in the tables below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our Common Stock indicated as beneficially owned by them.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of the Determination Date by (i) each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our Common Stock (our only class of voting securities), (ii) each of our directors and executive officers, and (iii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. To our knowledge, none of the shares listed below are held under a voting trust or similar agreement, except as noted.

Name and address of beneficial owner 

 Amount and
nature of beneficial
ownership(1)(2)
  Percent of
class(3)
 
       
Jeffrey B. Shealy, Chief Executive Officer, Director(4)  3,300,725   17.3%
David M. Aichele, Vice President of Business Development(5)  134,250   * 
Mark Boomgarden, Vice President of Operations(6)  178,441   * 
Cindy C. Payne, VP Finance(7)  184,375   1.0%
Steven P. DenBaars, Director(8)(9)  285,858   1.5%
Arthur E. Geiss, Director, Co-Chairman of the Board(8)(10)  76,306   * 
Jeffrey K. McMahon, Director(8) (11)  551,888   2.9%
Jerry D. Neal, Director, Co-Chairman of the Board(8) (11)  367,000   1.9%
John T. Kurtzweil, Chief Financial Officer(12)  22,000   * 
Suzanne Rudy, Director  30,000   * 
Steven Miller, Director  50,000   * 
All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)(13)  5,180,843   27.12%
         
Mark Tompkins        
App 1, Via Guidino 23        
Lugano 6900, Switzerland  2,349,906   12.3%

*Less than 1%

(1)Unless otherwise indicated in the table, the address for each person named in the table is c/o Akoustis Technologies, Inc., 9805 Northcross Center Court, Suite H, Huntersville, NC 28078.

(2)Unless otherwise indicated in the table, the shares are held directly by the beneficial owner.

(3)Applicable percentage ownership is based on 19,084,583 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the Determination Date, together with securities exercisable for or convertible into shares of Common Stock within 60 days after the Determination Date, for each shareholder.


(4)Includes 36,000 restricted shares that are subject to a repurchase option.

(5)Includes 130,000 restricted shares that are subject to a repurchase option.

(6)Includes 123,626 restricted shares that are subject to a repurchase option. Mr. Boomgarden resigned from the Company, effective September 15, 2017.

(7)Includes 175,000 restricted shares that are subject to a repurchase option.

(8)Includes 20,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options.

(9)Includes 38,204 restricted shares that are subject to a repurchase option.

(10)Includes 30,914 restricted shares that are subject to a repurchase option.

(11)Includes 22,000 restricted shares that are subject to a repurchase option.

(12)Includes 22,000 restricted shares that are subject to a repurchase option.

(13)Includes 599,744 restricted shares that are subject to a repurchase option

ITEM 13.         CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

SEC rules require us to disclose any transaction or currently proposed transaction in which the Company is a participant and in which any related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest involving the lesser of $120,000.00 or one percent (1%) of the average of the Company’s total assets as of the end of last two completed fiscal years. A related person is any executive officer, director, nominee for director, or holder of 5% or more of the Company’s Common Stock, or an immediate family member of any of those persons. Set forth below is a description of such related-party transactions that occurred during the transition period.

Certain of our directors and officers participated in the 2016-2017 Offering. Specifically:

Our CEO, Jeffrey Shealy, purchased 20,000 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000 in the 2016-2017 Offering.

Mark Boomgarden, our Vice President of Operations (until his resignation, effective September 15, 2017), purchased 2,000 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $10,000 in the 2016-2017 Offering.

Jerry Neal, one of our directors and Co-Chairman of our Board of Directors, purchased 200,000 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1,000,000 in the 2016-2017 Offering.

Arthur Geiss, one of our directors and Co-Chairman of our Board of Directors, purchased 2,000 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $10,000 in the 2016-2017 Offering.

Rohan Houlden, our Divisional Vice President of Product Engineering, purchased 20,000 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000 in the 2016-2017 Offering.

In addition, James R. Shealy, brother of our Chief Executive Officer, purchased 14,000 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $70,000 in the 2016-2017 Offering. Michael J. Shealy, a second brother of our Chief Executive Officer, purchased 20,000 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000 in the 2016-2017 Offering.

AEG Consulting, a firm owned and operated by Arthur Geiss, Co-Chairman of the Board, received $15,195 for consulting fees for the year ended June 30, 2017.


Steve Miller, one of our directors, served as a Board Advisor to the Board from January 2017 through June 2017, prior to joining the Board in July 2017. In connection with his service as a Board Advisor, the Board has approved a restricted stock award for 11,000 shares of Common Stock to be granted to Mr. Miller during the next open trading window.

The Board of Directors considered the above transactions in reaching its determination regarding the independence of our directors, See “Director Independence” under “Item 10-Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.”


ITEM 14.         PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Fees

The aggregate fees billed to us by Marcum LLP, our independent registered principal accounting firm, for services rendered for (i) the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017; (ii) the transition period from April 1, 2016 to June 30, 2016; and (iii) our prior fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 are set forth in the table below:

Fee Category

 Fiscal Year
ended June 30,
2017
  Transition Period
ended June 30,
2016(1)
  Fiscal year
ended March 31,
 2016
 
          
Audit fees (2) $121,495  $65,611  $109,458 
Audit-related fees (3)  40,757   13,692   26,583 
Tax fees (4)  10,341   16,276   34,037 
All other fees         
             
Total fees $172,593  $95,579  $170,078 

(1)Fees included in the Transition period ended June 30, 2016 include the fees for the audit of the three-month transition period as well as the audit of the year ended June 30, 2016.

(2)Audit fees consist of fees incurred for professional services rendered for the audit of consolidated financial statements, for reviews of our interim consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Forms 10-Q and for services that are normally provided in connection with statutory or regulatory filings or engagements.

(3)For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, audit-related fees are related to the review of the selling stockholder registration statement related to the 2016-2017 Offering and 2017 Offering and review of the registration statement on Form S-8 for the 2016 Plan. For our prior fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, audit-related fees are related to the review of the selling stockholder registration statement related to a private placement in 2015 and review of the Form 8-K filing associated with our May 2015 merger.

(4)Tax fees consist of fees billed for tax return preparation.

Pre-Approval Practice

The Board established an Audit Committee in February 2017. The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include establishing policies and procedures for the review and pre-approval by the Audit Committee of, and approving or pre-approving, all auditing services and permissible non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm, and any non-audit services to be performed by any other accounting firm. Our Audit Committee has adopted procedures for the pre-approval of services to be performed by the independent public accountants. Pursuant to this pre-approval policy, the Audit Committee considers, at least annually, and approves the terms of the audit engagement. At each regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting, the committee members review both a report summarizing the services, provided or anticipated to be provided by the auditor and the related fees and costs, and a listing of newly requested services subject to pre-approval since its last regularly scheduled meeting. Any proposed engagement relating to permissible non-audit services must be presented to the Audit Committee and pre-approved on a case-by-case basis, prior to the performance of the auditor. In addition, particular categories of permissible non-audit services that are recurring may be pre-approved by the Audit Committee subject to preset fee limits. The Audit Committee reviews requests for the provision of audit and non-audit services by the Company’s independent public accountants and determines if they should be approved. Such requests could be approved either at a meeting of the Audit Committee or upon approval by an independent director, if such responsibility has been delegated by the Audit Committee and if approval is needed between Audit Committee meetings. Any such interim approvals must be reported to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. Prior to approving any services, the Audit Committee considers whether the provision of such services is consistent with the SEC’s and the PCAOB’s rules on auditor independence and is compatible with maintaining the independence of the Company’s public accountants.


All fees related to audit, audit-related, tax, and other permitted non-audit services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee (or the Board of Directors if prior to the establishment of the Audit Committee).


PART IV

ITEM 15.         EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Financial Statement Schedules

The consolidated financial statements of Akoustis Technologies, Inc., and its subsidiaries are listed on the Index to Financial Statements on this annual report on Form 10-K beginning on page F-1.

All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

Exhibits

The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

57 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

AKOUSTIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Dated:  September 19, 2017By:/s/ Jeffrey B. Shealy
Jeffrey B. Shealy
President and Chief Executive Officer

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SIGNATURE 

TITLEDATE
/s/ Jeffrey B. ShealyChief Executive Officer (PrincipalSeptember 19, 2017
Jeffrey B. ShealyExecutive Officer), Director
/s/ John T. KurtzweilChief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal September 19, 2017
John T. KurtzweilFinancial and Accounting Officer)
/s/ Arthur E. GeissCo-Chairman of the BoardSeptember 19, 2017
Arthur E. Geiss
/s/ Jerry D. NealCo-Chairman of the BoardSeptember 19, 2017
Jerry D. Neal
/s/ Steven P. DenBaarsDirectorSeptember 19, 2017
Steven P. DenBaars
/s/ Jeffrey K. McMahonDirectorSeptember 19, 2017
Jeffrey K. McMahon
/s/ Steven P. MillerDirectorSeptember 19, 2017
Steven P. Miller
/s/ Suzanne B. RudyDirectorSeptember 19, 2017
Suzanne B. Rudy


INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm PCAOB ID#688F-2
  
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 20172023 and June 30, 20162022F-3F-4
  
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended June 30, 20172023 and 20162022F-4F-5
  
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended June 30, 20172023 and 20162022F-5F-6
  
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 20172023 and 20162022F-6F-7
  
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-7F-8

 


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Audit Committee of the

Stockholders and Board of Directors and Shareholdersof

of Akoustis Technologies, Inc.

 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Akoustis Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 20172023 and 2016, and2022, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the two years then ended. in the period ended June 30, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2023 and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended June 30, 2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included considerationAs part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion,Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements referredthat was communicated or required to above present fairly,be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.


Valuation of Customer Relationships Acquired in the Business Combination

Critical Audit Matter Description

As described in Note 7 to the financial statements, on January 1, 2023, the Company acquired all material respects,of the consolidated financial positionoutstanding capital stock of Grinding and Dicing Services, Inc. ("GDSI") for a total consideration of $13.9 million in cash and approximately $1.7 million shares of the Company's common stock. As of the date of the acquisition, the Company recognized customer relationships acquired at an estimated fair value of $6.1 million. As disclosed by management, the Company valued the acquired customer relationships utilizing the multi-period excess earnings method, a form of income approach. Determining the fair value of the customer relationships acquired required management to make significant judgments, including the revenue growth rate assumption, attrition rate, contributory asset charges, and discount rate.

We identified the valuation of customer relationships acquired in the acquisition of GDSI as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to estimate the fair value of the acquired customer relationships and the sensitivity of the fair value to the significant underlying assumptions, which include the revenue growth rate assumption, attrition rate, contributory asset charges, and discount rate. These significant assumptions are forward looking and could be affected by future economic and market conditions. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s fair value measurement of the acquired customer relationships.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the valuation of acquired customer relationships included the following, among others:

We obtained an understanding of the design of controls associated with management’s process for estimating the fair value of the acquired customer relationships.

We assessed the reasonableness of management’s projections by comparing the projection used to the historical financial results of the acquired business and certain peer companies.

We evaluated the reasonableness of the attrition rate by assessing the underlying data used in determining the rate and testing mathematical accuracy of the calculation.

With the assistance of our valuation specialists, we evaluated the reasonableness of the valuation methodology and the following significant valuation assumptions:

oDiscount rate by testing the source information underlying the determination of the discount rate, testing mathematical accuracy of the calculation, and reconciling the weighted average cost of capital, weighted average return on assets and internal rate of return.

oContributory asset charges by testing the source information underlying the determination of the contributory asset charges and mathematical accuracy of the calculation.

/s/ Marcum llp

Marcum llp

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.

New York, NY

September 6, 2023


Akoustis Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries, as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

  June 30,  June 30, 
  2023  2022 
Assets      
       
Assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents $43,104  $80,485 
Accounts receivable  4,753   3,793 
Inventory  7,548   4,094 
Other current assets  4,440   3,359 
Total current assets  59,845   91,731 
         
Property and equipment, net  57,826   51,157 
Goodwill  14,559   8,051 
Intangibles, net  15,241   8,994 
Operating lease right-of-use asset, net  1,374   1,126 
Other assets  72   279 
Total Assets $148,917  $161,338 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity        
         
Current Liabilities:        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $17,027  $11,204 
Contingent consideration     855 
Operating lease liability  439   313 
Deferred revenue  105   286 
Total current liabilities  17,571   12,658 
         
Long-term Liabilities:        
Convertible notes payable, net  43,347   43,731 
Contingent consideration     591 
Operating lease liability  976   811 
Promissory note payable  667    
Other long-term liabilities  117   117 
Total long-term liabilities  45,107   45,250 
         
Total Liabilities  62,678   57,908 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 15)        
Stockholders’ Equity        
Preferred Stock, par value $0.001: 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding      
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 125,000,000 shares authorized; 72,154,647 and 57,079,347 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2022, respectively  72   57 
Additional paid in capital  356,522   310,171 
Accumulated deficit  (270,355)  (206,798)
Total Stockholders’ Equity  86,239   103,430 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $148,917  $161,338 

The

See accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2notes to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has not generated any revenue, and has incurred losses since inception. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.statements.

 

/s/Marcumllp


 

Marcumllp

New York, NY
September 19, 2017


Akoustis Technologies, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

  June 30,  June 30, 
  2017  2016 
       
Assets        
         
Assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $9,631,520  $4,155,444 
Inventory  188,476   43,544 
Prepaid expenses  158,457   54,818 
Other current assets  42,808    
Total current assets  10,021,261   4,253,806 
         
Property and equipment, net  7,853,814   206,985 
         
Intangibles, net  206,527   71,233 
         
Other assets  10,715   10,715 
Total Assets $18,092,317  $4,542,739 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity        
         
Current Liabilities:        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $1,336,368  $543,646 
Deferred revenue  14,500    
Total current liabilities  1,350,868   543,646 
         
Long-term Liabilities:        
Contingent real estate liability  1,730,542    
Derivative liabilities     1,322,729 
Total long-term liabilities  1,730,542   1,322,729 
         
Total Liabilities  3,081,410   1,866,375 
         
Commitments and contingencies        
         
Stockholders' Equity        
Preferred Stock, par value $0.001: 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding      
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 45,000,000 shares authorized; 19,075,050 and 15,375,981 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016, respectively  19,075   15,376 
Additional paid in capital  30,774,885   9,335,801 
Accumulated deficit  (15,783,053)  (6,674,813)
Total Stockholders' Equity  15,010,907   2,676,364 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $18,092,317  $4,542,739 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements


Akoustis Technologies, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 (In thousands, except per share data)

 

  

For the Year Ended

June 30, 2017

  

For the Year Ended

June 30, 2016

 
       
Contract research and government grants $469,532  $254,834 
         
Revenue  16,964    
         
Total revenue  486,496   254,834 
         
Operating expenses        
Research and development  4,425,778   1,758,701 
General and administrative expenses  6,019,285   2,935,299 
Total operating expenses  10,445,063   4,694,000 
         
Loss from operations  (9,958,567)  (4,439,166)
         
Other income (expense)        
Other income     500 
Interest income  1,936   1,339 
Bargain purchase  1,725,881     
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  (877,490)  (968,840)
Total other income (expense)  850,327   (967,001)
Net loss $(9,108,240) $(5,406,167)
         
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted $(0.54) $(0.40)
         
Weighted average common shares outstanding -basic and diluted  16,990,536   13,349,482 
  For the
Year Ended
June 30,
2023
  For the
Year Ended
June 30,
2022
 
       
Revenue $27,121  $15,350 
         
Cost of revenue  30,237   19,487 
         
Gross profit  (3,116)  (4,137)
         
Operating expenses        
Research and development  33,243   35,708 
General and administrative expenses  29,710   20,710 
Total operating expenses  62,953   56,418 
         
Loss from operations  (66,069)  (60,555)
         
Other (expense) income        
Interest (expense) income  (2,322)  (77)
Change in fair value of contingent liability  1,446   (347)
Other (expense) income  (8)   
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  948   (48)
Total Other (expense) income  64   (472)
Net loss before income taxes $(66,005) $(61,027)
         
Income tax expense (benefit) $(2,448) $(1,833)
         
Net loss $(63,557) $(59,194)
         
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest     167 
         
Net Loss attributable to common stockholders  (63,557)  (59,027)
         
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted $(1.00) $(1.09)
         
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted  63,621,727   54,021,205 

TheSee accompanying notes are an integral part of theseto the consolidated financial statementsstatements.

 

 F-4


 

 

AkoustisAkoustis Technologies, Inc.

Consolidated StatementStatements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

For the Years Ended June 30, 20172023 and June 30, 20162022

(In thousands)

                
  Common Stock  Additional  Accumulated    
  Shares  Amount  Paid In Capital  Deficit  Stockholders’ Equity 
                
Balance, July 1, 2015  12,469,084  $12,469  $5,441,260  $(1,268,646) $4,185,083 
                     
Common stock issued for cash, net of issuance costs  2,240,000   2,240   3,330,343      3,332,583 
                     
Warrants issued to underwriter        (165,719)     (165,719)
                     
Common stock issued for services  660,231   660   702,950      703,610 
                     
Common stock issued for exercise of warrants  6,666   7   9,993      10,000 
                     
Transfer of warrants from liability to equity classification        16,974      16,974 
                     
Net loss           (5,406,167)  (5,406,167)
                     
Balance, June 30, 2016  15,375,981  $15,376  $9,335,801  $(6,674,813) $2,676,364 
                     
Common stock issued for cash, net of issuance costs  2,805,000   2,805   15,381,966      15,384,771 
                     
Warrants issued to underwriter        (991,767)     (991,767)
                     
Common stock issued for services  783,000   783   4,242,314      4,243,097 
                     
Common stock issued for exercise of warrants  111,069   111   171,649      171,760 
                     
Vesting of restricted shares        434,703      434,703 
                     
Transfer of warrants from liability to equity classification        2,200,219      2,200,219 
                     
Net loss           (9,108,240)  (9,108,240)
                     
Balance, June 30, 2017  19,075,050  $19,075  $30,774,885  $(15,783,053) $15,010,907 

 

The

           Total
Akoustis
       
  Common Stock  Additional
Paid In
  Accumulated  Technologies,
Inc.
  Noncontrolling  Total 
  Shares  Par Value  Capital  Deficit  Equity  Interest  Equity 
                      
Balance, June 30, 2021  51,236  $          51  $265,130  $(147,771) $117,410  $   —  $117,410 
                             
Common stock issued for cash, net of issuance costs  4,178   4   27,574      27,578      27,578 
                             
Stock-based compensation  739   1   10,246      10,247      10,247 
                             
Common stock issued for exercise of warrants  21      67      67      67 
                             
Common stock issued for exercise of options  87      409      409      409 
                             
ESPP purchase  135   1   592      593      593 
                             
Common stock issued in acquisition  683      4,162      4,162      4,162 
                             
Noncontrolling interest acquired        1,991      1,991   167   2,158 
                             
Net loss           (59,027)  (59,027)  (167)  (59,194)
Balance, June 30, 2022  57,079  $57  $310,171  $(206,798) $103,430  $  $103,430 
                             
Common stock issued for cash, net of issuance costs  12,546   12   32,013      32,025      32,025 
                             
Stock-based compensation  1,009   1   9,406      9,407      9,407 
ESPP purchase    89      560      560      560 
                             
Common stock issued in acquisition  606   1   1,689      1,690      1,690 
                             
Common stock issued in payment of note interest  826   1   2,683      2,684      2,684 
                             
Net loss           (63,557)  (63,557)     (63,557)
                             
Balance, June 30, 2023  72,155  $72  $356,522  $(270,355) $86,239  $  $86,239 

See accompanying notes are an integral part of theseto the consolidated financial statementsstatements.


Akoustis Technologies, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

 

  For the Year Ended  For the Year Ended 
  June 30, 2017  June 30, 2016 
       
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:        
Net loss $(9,108,240) $(5,406,167)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation  102,876   34,828 
Amortization of intangibles  7,208   3,339 
Share-based compensation  3,906,111   849,625 
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  877,490   968,840 
Bargain purchase  (1,725,881)   
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Inventory  (48,883)  (43,544)
Prepaid expenses  (103,639)  4,994 
Other current asset  (42,808)   
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  572,644   275,116 
Deferred revenue  14,500    
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities  (5,548,622)  (3,312,969)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Cash paid for machinery and equipment  (1,625,055)  (160,172)
Cash paid for acquisition of STC-MEMS  (2,846,049)   
Cash paid for intangibles  (60,729)  (43,495)
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities  (4,531,833)  (203,667)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Proceeds from issuance of common stock  15,384,771   3,332,584 
Proceeds from exercise of warrants  171,760   10,000 
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities  15,556,531   3,342,584 
         
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash  5,476,076   (174,052)
         
Cash - Beginning of Period  4,155,444   4,329,496 
         
Cash - End of Period $9,631,520  $4,155,444 
         
SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOW INFORMATION:        
Cash Paid During the Period for:        
Income taxes $  $ 
Interest $  $ 
         
SUPPLEMENTARY DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
         
Stock compensation payable $654,781  $146,016 
Warrants issued for stock issuance costs $991,767  $165,719 
Reclassification of derivative liability to additional paid in capital $2,200,219  $ 
Contingent liability $1,730,542  $ 
  For the
Year Ended
  For the
Year Ended
 
  June 30,
2023
  June 30,
2022
 
       
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:      
Net loss $(63,557) $(59,194)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  11,256   7,853 
Stock-based compensation  9,407   10,247 
Amortization of debt discount  564   29 
Non-cash interest payments  2,684    
(Gain)/Loss on disposal of assets  (100)  (210)
Change in deferred tax assets  (2,394)   
Amortization of operating lease right of use asset  395   271 
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  (948)  48 
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  (1,446)  347 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (79)  (1,639)
Inventory  (3,454)  (2,506)
Other current asset  (805)  (1,241)
Other assets     (12)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  3,522   2,975 
Lease liabilities  (352)  (274)
Other long term liabilities  667   (1,980)
Deferred revenue  (181)  91 
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities  (44,821)  (45,195)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Cash paid for machinery and equipment  (11,385)  (27,720)
Cash received from sale of fixed assets  121   357 
Cash paid for investment in subsidiary  (13,882)  (7,579)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities  (25,146)  (34,942)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Proceeds from issuance of common stock  32,026   27,578 
Proceeds from exercise of warrants     67 
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options     409 
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan  560   592 
Proceeds received from convertible note, net of issuance costs     43,654 
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities  32,586   72,300 
         
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents  (37,381)  (7,837)
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning of Period  80,485   88,322 
Cash and Cash Equivalents - End of Period $43,104  $80,485 
         
SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOW INFORMATION:        
Cash Paid During the Period for:        
Income taxes $40  $112 
         
SUPPLEMENTARY DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Common stock issued in payment of interest $2,684  $ 
Fixed assets included in accounts payable and accrued expenses $  $(393)
Operating lease right-of-use asset, net $133  $ 
Operating lease liability $(133) $ 
Acquisition of Business        
Tangible assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents $3,904   1,346 
Intangibles $8,289   9,452 
Goodwill $6,508   8,051 
Deferred Tax Liability $(2,394)  (1,980)
Contingent consideration $   1,099 
Liabilities assumed $(1,124)  (1,871)
Liabilities cancelled $88    
Issuance of common stock for acquisition $1,690   4,162 
Noncontrolling interest acquired $   (2,158)

 

TheSee accompanying notes are an integral part of theseto the consolidated financial statementsstatements.


AKOUSTIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Note 1. Organization

 

Akoustis Technologies, Inc. (formerly known as Danlax, Corp.) (“the Company”(the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada, U.S. on April 10, 2013. Effective2013, and effective December 15, 2016, the Company changed its state of incorporation from the State of Nevada to the State of Delaware. Through its subsidiaries,wholly-owned subsidiary, Akoustis, Inc. and Akoustis Manufacturing New York, Inc. (each a(a Delaware corporation), the Company, headquartered in Huntersville, North Carolina, is focused on developing, designing, and manufacturing innovative radio frequency (“RF”) filter products for the mobile wireless device industry. The mission ofindustry, including for products such as smartphones and tablets, cellular infrastructure equipment, Wi-Fi Customer Premise Equipment (“CPE”), and military and defense communication applications. Located between the device’s antenna and its digital backend, the RF front-end (“RFFE”) is the circuitry that performs the analog signal processing and contains components such as amplifiers, filters and switches. To construct the resonator devices that are the building blocks for its RF filters, the Company is to commercialize and manufacture its patented BulkONE®has developed a family of novel, high purity acoustic wave technology to address the critical frequency-selectivity requirements in today’s mobile smartphones - improving the efficiency and signal quality of mobile wireless devices and enabling the Internet of Things.

On August 11, 2016, the Company changed its fiscal year from the period beginning on April 1 and ending on March 31 of each year to the period beginning on July 1 and ending on June 30 of each year, effective for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.

On March 10, 2017, the Company announced that its common stock was approved for listing on the NASDAQ Capital Market, effective March 13, 2017, under the symbol AKTS.

Acquisition of Assets

On June 26, 2017, pursuant to a Definitive Asset Purchase Agreement and Definitive Real Property Purchase Agreement (collectively, the “Agreements”) with The Research Foundation for the State University of New York (“RF-SUNY”) and Fuller Road Management Corporation (“FRMC”), an affiliate of RF-SUNY, respectively, the Company completed the acquisition of certain specified assets, including STC-MEMS, a semiconductor wafer-manufacturing operation and microelectromechanical systems (“MEMS”) business with associated wafer-manufacturing tools,piezoelectric materials as well as the real estatea unique microelectromechanical system (“MEMS”) wafer semiconductor process, collectively referred to as XBAW® technology. The Company leverages its integrated device manufacturing (“IDM”) business model to develop and improvements associated with the facility locatedsell high performance RF filters using its XBAW® technology. Filters are critical in Canandaigua, New York, which is usedselecting and rejecting signals, and their performance enables differentiation in the operationmodules defining the RFFE. Additionally, through RFM Integrated Device, Inc. (“RFMi”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of STC-MEMS (the assets and real estate and improvements referred to together herein as the “STC-MEMS Business”)Akoustis, Inc.,which was created in 2010 by RF-SUNY as an economic development project. The purpose of the initiative was to explore different technology opportunities with the goal of being a vertically integrated provider of foundry services that would offer its customers the capacity, infrastructure and operational capabilities of semiconductor and advanced manufacturing for aerospace, biomedical, communications, defense, and energy markets. Post-acquisition date, the Company makes sales of complementary surface acoustic wave (“SAW”) resonators, RF filters, crystal (Xtal) resonators and oscillators, and ceramic products branded as “RFMi” products. We also agreed to assume substantially all the on-going obligations of STC incurredoffer back-end semiconductor supply chain services through our wholly owned subsidiary, Grinding & Dicing Services, Inc. (“GDSI"), which we acquired in the ordinary course of business including with respect to the 29 employees employed by RF-SUNY.January 2023.

 

The Company acquired the STC-MEMS Business through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Akoustis Manufacturing New York, Inc., (“Akoustis NY”), a Delaware corporation.

See Note 4 for a detailed description of the transaction. 


The 2016-2017 Offering

The Company sold a total of 2,142,000 shares of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) in a private placement offering (the “2016-2017 Offering”) at a fixed purchase price of $5.00 per share (the “2016-2017 Offering Price”), with closings in each of November and December 2016 and January and February 2017. The Company also sold a total of 663,000 shares of Common Stock in a private placement offering (the “2017 Offering” and together with the 2016-2017 Offering, the “Offerings”) at a fixed purchase price of $9.00 per share (the “2017 Offering Price”), with closings in May 2017. Aggregate gross proceeds from the Offerings totaled $16.7 million before deducting commissions and expenses of approximately $1.3 million. In connection with the 2016-2017 Offering, the Company also issued to the placement agents warrants to purchase an aggregate 205,126 shares of Common Stock with a term of five years and an exercise price of $5.00 per share, and in connection with the 2017 Offering, the Company issued to the placement agents warrants to purchase an aggregate 46,410 shares of Common Stock with a term of five years and an exercise price of $9.00 per share. In accordance with the terms of the subscription agreements executed by the Company and each of the investors, if the Company issues additional shares of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents (subject to customary exceptions, including but not limited to issuances of awards under Company employee stock incentive programs and certain issuances in connection with credit arrangements, equipment financings, lease arrangements, or similar transactions) between November 25, 2016 and September 4, 2017 (with respect to the 2016-2017 Offering), or between May 1, 2017 and May 1, 2019 (with respect to the 2017 Offering), for a consideration per share less than the 2016-2017 Offering Price or the 2017 Offering Price, as applicable (as adjusted for any subsequent stock dividend, stock split, distribution, recapitalization, reclassification, reorganization, or similar event) (the “Lower Price”), each investor will be entitled to receive from the Company additional shares of Common Stock in an amount such that, when added to the number of shares of Common Stock initially purchased by such investor, will equal the number of shares of Common Stock that such Investor’s investment in the applicable offering would have purchased at the Lower Price.

The March 2016 and April 2016 Offerings

On March 10, 2016, the Company held a closing of a private placement offering (the “March 2016 Offering”) in which it sold 494,125 shares of Common Stock at a fixed purchase price of $1.60 per share (the “2016 Offering Price”), for aggregate gross proceeds of $790,600 (before deducting legal expenses of $20,913 for the March 2016 Offering). 

On April 14, 2016, the Company held closings of a private placement offering (the “April 2016 Offering”) in which the Company sold 1,741,185 shares of Common Stock at a fixed purchase price of $1.60 per share (the “2016 Offering Price”), for aggregate gross proceeds of $2,785,896 (before deducting expenses of $223,000 for legal services and agent commissions of the April 2016 Offering).

Investors in the shares were given anti-dilution protection with respect to the shares of Common Stock sold in the April 2016 Offering such that if, during the period from the closing of the April 2016 Offering until 90 days after the date on which the registration statement that the Company is required to file under a Registration Rights Agreement with the  investors is declared effective by the SEC, the Company shall issue additional shares of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents (subject to customary exceptions, including but not limited to issuances of awards under the Company’s 2015 Equity Incentive Plan and certain issuances of securities in connection with credit arrangements, equipment financings, lease arrangements or similar transactions) for a consideration per share less than the 2016 Offering Price (as adjusted for any subsequent stock dividend, stock split, distribution, recapitalization, reclassification, reorganization or similar event) (the “2016 Lower Price”), each such investor will be entitled to receive from the Company additional shares of Common Stock in an amount such that, when added to the number of shares of Common Stock initially purchased by such investor, will equal the number of shares of Common Stock that such investor’s Offering subscription amount would have purchased at the 2016 Lower Price. As of mid-October 2016, the anti-dilution rights expired.

In connection with the April 2016 Offering, the Company agreed to pay the placement agents a cash commission of 8% of the gross proceeds raised from investors first contacted by the placement agents in the 2016 Offering. In addition, the placement agents received warrants to purchase a number of shares of Common Stock equal to 10% of the number of shares of Common Stock sold in the April 2016 Offering, with a term of five (5) years and an exercise price of $1.60 per share (the “2016 Placement Agent Warrants”). Any sub-agent of the placement agents that introduced investors to the 2016 April Offering was entitled to share in the cash fees and warrants attributable to those investors as described above.


Note 2. Going Concern and Management PlansLiquidity

 

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had working capital of $8.7 million and an accumulated deficit of $15.8 million. Since inception, the Company has recorded approximately $892,000 of revenue from contract research and government grants. As of June 30, 2017,2023, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $9.6$43.1 million which theand working capital of $42.3 million. The Company believes ishas historically incurred recurring operating losses and experienced net cash used in operating activities.

The Company expects its current cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to fund its current operations through December 2017. As a result, webeyond the next twelve months from the date of filing of this Form 10-K. These funds will needbe used to fund the Company’s operations, including capital expenditures, R&D, commercialization of our technology, development of our patent strategy and expansion of our patent portfolio, as well as to provide working capital and funds for other general corporate purposes. Except for the $48.0 million of common stock remaining available to be sold under its ATM Sales Agreement with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, and Roth Capital Partners, LLC, the Company has no commitments or arrangements to obtain additional capital through the sale of additional equity securities, debt and additional grants, or otherwise, to fund operations past that date. The Company is actively managing and controlling the Company’s cash outflows to mitigate these risks, these matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset amounts or the classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company had $6.7 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand as of September 8, 2017 to fund its business.

There is no assurance that the Company’s projections and estimates are accurate. The Company’s primary sources of funds for operations since inception have been private equity, note financings and grants. The Company needs to obtain additional capital to accomplish its business plan objectives and will continue its efforts to secure additional funds, through issuance of debt or equity instruments and/or receipts of grants as appropriate. However, the amount of funds raised, if any, may not be sufficient to enable the Company to attain profitable operations. To the extent that the Company is unsuccessful in obtaining additional financing, the Company may need to curtail or cease its operations and implement a plan to extend payables or reduce overhead until sufficient additional capital is raised to support further operations. Therethere can be no assurance that such a planfunds will be successful.available on acceptable terms or at all.

 

If in the future the Company is unable to obtain additional financing in a timely fashion and on acceptable terms when such financing is needed, its financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected and it may not be able to continue operations or execute its stated commercialization plan.

Note 3. Summary of significant accounting policies

 

Basis of presentation

 

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Akoustis, Inc., RFMi, and Akoustis Manufacturing New York, Inc.GDSI. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Use of estimates and assumptions

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accountingpolicies, estimates and assumptions affectinginclude estimates and assumptions used in valuation of equity instruments, deferred taxes and related valuation allowances, contingent consideration, goodwill, fair value of the financial statements were:

(1)Fair value of long–lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long–lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long–lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under–performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time;acquired intangible assets, initial fair value of the non-controlling interest, revenue recognition, derivative liabilities, and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

(2)Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the NOL carry–forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company’s incurrence of losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) other factors.

(3)Estimates and assumptions used in valuation of equity instruments: Management estimates expected term of share options and similar instruments, expected volatility of the Company’s common shares and the method used to estimate it, expected annual rate of quarterly dividends, and risk-free rate(s) to value share options and similar instruments.

(4)Estimates and assumptions used in valuation of derivative liability: Management utilizes a binomial option pricing model to estimate the fair value of derivative liabilities. The model includes subjective assumptions that can materially affect the fair value estimates.

(5)Estimates and assumptions used in business combinations: The accounting for business combinations requires estimates and judgments as to expectations for future cash flows of the acquired business, and the allocation of those cash flows to identifiable intangible assets, in determining the estimated fair value for assets and liabilities acquired. The fair value measurement is highly sensitive to significant changes in the unobservable inputs and significant increases (decreases) in discount rate or decreases (increases) in price/earnings multiples would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. The fair values assigned to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on management’s estimates and assumptions, including valuations that utilize customary valuation procedures and techniques. If the actual results differ from the estimates and judgments used in these estimates, the amounts recorded in the financial statements could result in a possible impairment of the acquired assets. 

These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.long-lived assets. Actual results could differ from thosethe estimates.

 


Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash deposits. The Company maintains its cash in institutions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). At times, the Company’s cash and cash equivalent balances may be uninsured or in amounts that exceed the FDIC insurance limits; as of June 30, 20172023, approximately $9.4$42.3 million was uninsured.


Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable is recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses inherent in its accounts receivable portfolio. Management considers an account receivable to be past due when it is not settled under its stated terms. In establishing the required allowance, management considers historical losses adjusted to take into account current market conditions and customers’ financial condition, the amount of receivables in dispute, and the current receivables aging and current payment patterns. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. During the years ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, the Company's allowance for doubtful accounts was immaterial. The Company does not have any off balance sheet credit exposure related to its customers.

Inventory

 

Inventory, which consists of raw materials, work-in-process and finished product, is stated at the lower of cost or market using thenet realizable value. Inventory is valued on a first-in first-out (FIFO) valuation method. Inventory was comprisedbasis. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of the following at June 30, 2017business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and 2016:

  June 30, 2017  June 30, 2016 
Finished goods held for resale $49,374  $43,544 
Raw materials  139,102    
  $188,476  $43,544 

transportation.

Property and equipment, net

 

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated using the straight–line method on the various asset classes over their estimated useful lives, which range from threetwo to teneleven years. Expenditures for major renewals and betterments that extend the useful lives of property and equipment are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs, which do not extend the economic useful life of the related assets, are charged to operations as incurred. The Company records gains or losses on the disposal of assets as the difference between net book value of assets and cash received less costs to dispose of assets. Gains or losses on the disposal of assets, as well as impairment of assets held for sale are recorded in operating expenses.


Leases

The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. For each lease, the lease term is determined at the commencement date and includes renewal options and termination options when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. Operating leases with the lease terms greater than one year are included in operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and current and long-term operating lease liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

Operating lease ROU assets represent the right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term using an estimated rate of interest the Company would have to pay to borrow equivalent funds on a collateralized basis at the lease commencement date. The operating lease ROU assets are based on the liability adjusted for any prepaid or deferred rent and lease incentives. The incremental borrowing rate was utilized to discount lease payments over the expected term given that the Company’s operating leases do not provide an implicit rate. The Company estimates the incremental borrowing rate to reflect the profile of secured borrowing over the expected term of the leases based on the information available at the later of the date of adoption or the lease commencement date. Rent expense for the operating lease is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

 

Business Combinations

The Company uses the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations and recognizes assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their fair values on the date acquired. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the acquired identifiable net assets. The fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired are determined based upon the Company’s valuation using a combination of market, income, or cost approaches. The valuation involves making significant estimates and assumptions, which are based on detailed financial models including the projection of future cash flows and the weighted average cost of capital.

Contingent Consideration

Contingent consideration relates to the potential payment for an acquisition that is contingent upon the achievement by the acquired business of revenue targets. The Company records contingent consideration at fair value based on the consideration expected to be transferred. For potential payments related to revenue target achievements, the Company estimated the fair value based on the probability of achievement of such revenue targets. The assumptions utilized in the calculation of the fair value include the probability assessments of expected future sales revenue of RFMi products in each of calendar year 2022 and 2023 and the volatility of those revenues, appropriately discounted considering the uncertainties associated with the obligation. Contingent consideration is remeasured each reporting period, and subsequent changes in fair value are recognized within other (expense) income in the Company’s Statement of Operations.

Goodwill and Intangible assets, net

Goodwill is the excess of purchase price over the fair value of identified net assets of businesses acquired. The Company has two operating segments and two reporting units. The Company reviews goodwill at least annually for possible impairment and will test for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. No impairment charge was recognized for the years ended June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2022.

 

Intangible assets consist of patentsdeveloped technology, trademarks, and trademarks.customer relationships. Applicable long–lived assets are amortized or depreciated over the shorter of their estimated useful lives, the estimated period that the assets will generate revenue, or the statutory or contractual term in the case of patents. Estimates of useful lives and periods of expected revenue generation are reviewed periodically for appropriateness and are based upon management’s judgment. PatentsDeveloped technology is amortized using the straight-line method over their weighted average useful lives of 10 years, trademarks are amortized onusing the straight-line method over their useful lives of 155 years and customer relationships are amortized using the straight-line method over their useful lives of 7 years.

 


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets, including property and equipment, when there are indications that the assets might be impaired. When evaluating assets for potential impairment, the Company compares the carrying value of the asset to its estimated undiscounted future cash flows. If an asset’s carrying value exceeds such estimated undiscounted cash flows, the Company records an impairment charge for the difference between the carrying amount of the asset and its fair value.

 

Based on its assessments, the Company did not record any impairment charges for the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

 

The Company measures the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on the guidance of ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. 

 

ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.


Fair value measurements are categorized using a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs used to measure fair value, which prioritize the inputs into three broad levels:

 

Level 1 - Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

 

Level 2 - Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date, and include those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies.

 

Level 3 - Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.

 

Derivative Liability

 

The Company evaluates its options, warrants, convertible notes, or other contracts, if any, to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with paragraph 815-10-05-4 and Section 815-40-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.separately. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of theany identified embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as either an asset or a liability. The change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion, exercise or cancellation of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the date of conversion, exercise or cancellation and then the related fair value is reclassified to equity.

In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.

 

The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

 

The Company adopted Section 815-40-15 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 815-40-15”)to determineanalyzes whether an instrument (or an embedded feature) is indexed to the Company’s own stock.  Section 815-40-15 provides that an entity should usestock and uses a two-step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions.

 

The Company utilizes a binomial option pricing model to compute the fair value of the derivative and to mark to market the fair value of the derivative at each balance sheet date. The Company records the change in the fair value of the derivative as other income or expense in the consolidated statements of operations.


 

Revenue Recognition

 

Change in Accounting Policy for Revenue Recognition

Effective October 1, 2016, the Company changed its accounting policy for the recognition of grant revenue. The Company believes this change in accounting policy is preferable due to the fact that grant revenue is viewed as an ongoing function of its intended operations. This change in accounting policy also enhances the comparability of the Company’s financial statements with many of its industry peers. The adoption of this accounting policy change has been applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and has had no impact on net loss per share.


Contract Research and Government Grants

 

The Company may generatederives its revenue primarily from the sale of filter products under individual customer purchase orders, some of which have underlying master sales agreements that specify terms governing the product sales. In the absence of a sales license agreements, collaborative research and development arrangements, and government grants. To dateagreement, the Company’s principal sourcestandard terms and conditions apply. Revenue is recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to the Company’s customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Company applies a five-step approach as defined in FASB ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), in determining the amount and timing of revenue consists of government research grants. The Company recognizes nonrefundable grantto be recognized: (1) identifying the contract with a customer; (2) identifying the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determining the transaction price; (4) allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognizing revenue when itthe corresponding performance obligation is received and reports thissatisfied.

Each distinct promise to transfer products is considered to be an identified performance obligation for which revenue as “Contract research and government grants” onis recognized at a point in time upon transfer of control of the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Contracts executed and monies received priorproducts to the recognitioncustomer. Transfer of revenuecontrol occurs upon shipment to the distributor or direct customer. Returns under the Company’s general assurance warranty of products have not been material, and warranty-related services are recorded as deferred revenue.not considered a separate performance obligation.

 

Engineering Review Services

Pricing adjustments and estimates of returns are treated as variable consideration for purposes of determining the transaction price. Sales returns are generally accepted at the Company’s discretion. Variable consideration is estimated using the expected value method considering all reasonably available information, including the Company’s historical experience and its current expectations, and is reflected in the transaction price when sales are recorded. The Company records Engineering Review Servicesnet revenue (“ERS”) which is for providing one time design and development services wherebyexcluding taxes collected on its sales to trade customers.

Accounts receivable represents the Company’s R&D personnel deliver simulations/models and demonstration units (low volume) for evaluation by the customers. The Company recognizes revenue when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the service has been providedunconditional right to the customer, the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable, and the collection of fees is reasonably assured. Total ERS revenue to date is approximately $14,500.

Revenue Recognition for Facility Rental Income

Effective June 26, 2017, the Company records rental income for the tenants atreceive consideration from its customer. Substantially all payments are collected within the Company’s NY fabrication facility. The Company recognizes rental income in the period the rental services are delivered to the lessee; rent is receivedstandard terms, which do not include a significant financing component. To date, there have been no material impairment losses on a monthly, straight-line basis.accounts receivable.

 

Research and Development

 

Research and development expenses are charged to operations as incurred.

 

Equity–Stock–based compensation

 

The Company recognizes compensation expense for all equity–based payments in accordance with ASC 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation. Under based on estimated fair values. The fair value recognition provisions, the Company recognizes equity–based compensation net of an estimated forfeiture rate and recognizes compensation cost only for those shares expected to vestshare-based payment awards is amortized over the requisite service period, ofwhich is defined as the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for an award. The Company recognizes the expense for the awards ratably over the service period for each separately vesting tranche.

 

Restricted stock awards areAwards granted atby the discretion of the Company. These awards are restricted as to the transfer of ownership andCompany generally vest over the requisite service periods, typically over a four-year or five-year period. Awards granted to non-employee directors generally vest over a one-year period (generally vesting either ratably overfrom the first four years or on a tier basis of 50% on the second anniversary of the effective date and 25% on the third and fourth anniversary dates). grant date.

The fair value of a restricted stock award is equal to the fair market value of a share of Company stock on the grant date.date of grant.

 

The fair value of an option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black–Scholes option valuation model. The Black–Scholes option valuation model requires the development of assumptions that are inputs into the model. These assumptions are the value of the underlying share, the expected stock volatility, the risk–free interest rate, the expected life of the option, and the dividend yield on the underlying stock and the expected forfeiture rate.stock. Expected volatility is benchmarked against similar companies in a similar industrycalculated using the historical volatilities of the Company’s common stock traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market over the expected option life and other appropriate factors.term. Risk–free interest rates are calculated based on continuously compounded risk–free rates for the appropriate term. The expected life of the option is calculated under the simplified method. The dividend yield is assumed to be zero as the Company has never paid or declared any cash dividends on its Common stock and does not intend to pay dividends on its Common stock in the foreseeable future. The expected forfeiture rate is estimated based on management’s best estimate.Company accounts for the impact of forfeitures as they occur.


Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of equity–based payment awards requires the input of the subjective assumptions described above. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of equity–based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, which involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, equity–based compensation could be materially different in the future. In addition, the Company is requiredhas elected to estimateaccount for the expected forfeiture rate and recognize expense only forimpact of forfeitures as those shares expected to vest.forfeitures occur. If the Company’s actual forfeiture rate is materially different from its estimate,forfeitures are material, the equity–based compensation could be significantly different from what the Company has recorded in the current period.

 

The Company accounts for share–based payments granted to non–employees in accordance with ASC 505-40, “Equity Based Payments to Non–Employees”. The Company determines the fair value of the stock–based payment as either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. If the fair value of the equity instruments issued is used, it is measured using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of either (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, or (2) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete. The fair value of the equity instruments is re-measured each reporting period over the requisite service period.


 

Income taxes

 

The Company appliesaccounts for income taxes using the elementsasset and liability approach. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized and represent the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of ASC 740–10 “Income Taxes” regarding accounting for uncertaintyexisting assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. They are measured using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the related temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income taxes. This clarifiesin the accountingperiod that includes the enactment date. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in selling, general and administrative expenses.

As part of the financial process, the Company assesses on a tax jurisdictional basis the likelihood that the Company’s deferred tax assets can be recovered. If recovery is not more likely than not (a likelihood of less than 50 percent), the provision for uncertaintytaxes must be increased by recording a reserve in the form of a valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets that are estimated not to ultimately be recoverable. In this process, certain relevant criteria are evaluated including: the amount of income or loss in prior years, the existence of deferred tax liabilities that can be used to absorb deferred tax assets, future expected taxable income, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. Changes in taxable income, market conditions, U.S. or international tax laws, and other factors may change the Company’s judgment regarding whether the Company will be able to realize the deferred tax assets. These changes, if any, may require material adjustments to the net deferred tax assets and an accompanying reduction or increase in income taxes recognizedtax expense which will result in financial statements and requires the impact of a tax position to be recognizedcorresponding increase or decrease in net income in the period when such determinations are made.

As part of the Company’s financial statements ifprocess, the Company also assesses the likelihood that positionthe Company’s tax reporting positions will ultimately be sustained. To the extent it is determined it is more likely than not (a likelihood of beingmore than 50 percent) that some portion or all of a tax reporting position will ultimately not be recognized and sustained, by the taxing authority. As of March 31, 2017, no liabilitya provision for unrecognized tax benefits was requiredbenefit is provided by either reducing the applicable deferred tax asset or accruing an income tax liability. The Company’s judgment regarding the sustainability of the Company’s tax reporting positions may change in the future due to be reported. The Company does not expect thatchanges in U.S. or international tax laws and other factors. These changes, if any, may require material adjustments to the amount of unrecognizedrelated deferred tax benefitsassets or accrued income tax liabilities and an accompanying reduction or increase in income tax expense which will significantlyresult in a corresponding increase or decrease within the next twelve months. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to tax mattersin net income in the income tax provision on the Statement of Operations. There was no interest and penalties for the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

Deferred taxesperiod when such determinations are computed based on the tax liability or benefit in future years of the reversal of temporary differences in the recognition of income or deduction of expenses between financial and tax reporting purposes. The net difference, if any, between the provision for taxes and taxes currently payable is reflected in the balance sheet as deferred taxes. Deferred tax assets and/or liabilities, if any, are classified as current and non–current based on the classification of the related asset or liability for financial reporting purposes, or based on the expected reversal date for deferred taxes that are not related to an asset or liability. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets to that amount which is more likely than not to be realized. made.

 

Loss Per Share

Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share is determined using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents. In periods when losses are reported, which is the case for the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 presented in these consolidated financial statements, the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding excludes common stock equivalents because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

The Company had the following common stock equivalents at June 30, 2017 and 2016:

   June 30, 2017  June 30, 2016 
Options   160,000   160,000 
Warrants   612,165   471,697 
Totals   772,165   631,697 

Shares Outstanding

Shares outstanding include shares of restricted stock with respect to which restrictions have not lapsed. Restricted stock included in reportable shares outstanding was 1,646,965 shares and 1,361,055 shares as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Shares of restricted stock are included in the calculation of weighted average shares outstanding.

Reclassification

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. The reclassifications did not have an impact on net loss as previously reported.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

In July 2015,November 2021, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2015-11 “Inventory("ASU") 2021-10, "Government Assistance (Topic 330)Simplifying832) - Disclosures by Business Entities about Government Assistance" to increase transparency about certain government assistance or grants received by a business entity. This new guidance requires the Measurementdisclosure of Inventory” (“(1) the types of assistance, (2) an entity's accounting for the assistance, and (3) the effect of the assistance on an entity's financial statements. The Company adopted ASU 2015-11”). The amendments2021-10 on July 1, 2022.

From time to time, the Company receives cash grants and tax abatements from U.S. federal and state governments which, in this Update domost cases, attach conditions for a specific duration period and generally relate to hiring employees, the construction or acquisition of assets or to developing specific technologies. If conditions are not apply to inventory that is measured using last-in, first-out (LIFO)satisfied, or the retail inventory method. duration period for the agreement is infringed, the incentives are subject to reduction, termination, or recapture.

The amendments applyCompany's accounting policy is to allrecognize a benefit to the income statement over the duration of the program when the conditions, including the required spending attached to the incentive are achieved and the Company is expected to complete any further requirements. A grant that compensates for operational expenses is recognized as a reduction from the nature of the expense the grant is designated to offset. A grant related to property, plant and equipment investments is recognized as a reduction to the cost-basis of the underlying assets with an ongoing reduction to depreciation expense based on the useful lives of the related assets. During fiscal 2023, the Company received a de-minimis amount related to these programs.

In August 2022, the Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors and Science Act (the "CHIPS Act") was signed into law. The CHIPS Act provides for a 25% refundable tax credit on certain investments in domestic semiconductor manufacturing. The credit is provided for qualifying property, which is placed in service after December 31, 2022. The CHIPS Act also provides for certain other inventory, which includes inventory thatfinancial incentives to further investments in domestic semiconductor manufacturing. The Company is measured using first-in, first-out (FIFO) orevaluating the provisions of the new law and its potential impact to the Company.

In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act (the "IRA") was signed into law. The IRA establishes a new book minimum tax of 15% on consolidated adjusted GAAP pre-tax earnings for corporations with average cost. An entity should measure inventory within the scopeincome in excess of this update at the lower of cost$1 billion and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory measured using LIFO or the retail inventory method.For public business entities, the amendments in this update are effective for fiscaltax years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years.31, 2022. In addition, the IRA also introduced a nondeductible 1% excise tax on a publicly traded corporation for the net value of certain stock repurchases during the tax year (effective for repurchases after December 31, 2022). The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2015-11new law did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.  

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes”, which will require entities to present deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. The ASU simplifies the current guidance, which requires entities to separately present deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. The ASU may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those annual periods. Earlier application is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual period. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2015-17 on theCompany’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In JanuaryJune 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, “Financial2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and– Credit Losses (Topic 326) – Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial AssetsInstruments”, which requires entities to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and Financial Liabilities”. The update addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentationreasonable and disclosure of financial instruments. For public business entities,supportable forecasts. This replaces the amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted only for certain portions of the ASU related to financial liabilities. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of this new standard on the consolidated financial statements. 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases(Topic 842). The FASB issued this update to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the update is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new standard.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation” (Topic 718). The FASB issued this update to improve the accounting for employee share-based payments and affect all organizations that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. Several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions are simplified, including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the statement of cash flows. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the update is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new standard.


In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10,“Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing (Topic 606)”. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross verses Net) (Topic 606)”. These amendments provide additional clarification and implementation guidance on the previously issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. The amendments in ASU 2016-10 provide clarifying guidance on materiality of performance obligations; evaluating distinct performance obligations; treatment of shipping and handling costs; and determining whether an entity’s promise to grant a license provides a customer with either a right to use an entity’s intellectual property or a right to access an entity’s intellectual property. The amendments in ASU 2016-08 clarify how an entity should identify the specified good or service for the principal versus agent evaluation and how it should apply the control principle to certain types of arrangements. The adoption of ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-08 is to coincide with an entity’s adoption of ASU 2014-09, which the Company intends to adopt for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is in the process of evaluating the standard and does not expect the adoption will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12,“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients”,which narrowly amended the revenue recognition guidance regarding collectability, noncash consideration, presentation of sales tax and transitionexisting incurred loss model and is effective duringapplicable to the same period as ASU 2014-09. The Company is currently evaluating the standard and does not expect the adoption will have a material effectmeasurement of credit losses on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”. This update provides guidance on how to record eight specific cash flow issues. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted and a retrospective transition method to each period should be presented. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of this update on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18,“Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)”, requiring that the statement of cash flows explain the change in the total cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents.assets measured at amortized cost. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. The provisions of this guidance are to be applied using a retrospective approach which requires application of the guidance for all periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new standard. 

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting,”which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. This standard is required to be adopted in the first quarter of 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features; II. Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception”. Part I of this update addresses the complexity of accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features. Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced on the basis of the pricing of future equity offerings. Current accounting guidance creates cost and complexity for entities that issue financial instruments (such as warrants and convertible instruments) with down round features that require fair value measurement of the entire instrument or conversion option. Part II of this update addresses the difficulty of navigating Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, because of the existence of extensive pending content in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This pending content is the result of the indefinite deferral of accounting requirements about mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of certain nonpublic entities and certain mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests. The amendments in Part II of this update do not have an accounting effect. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018.2022. The Company is evaluatingcurrently assessing the effectimpact that ASU 2017-11adopting this new accounting standard will have on itsour consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.but does not expect it to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


Note 4. Acquisition of STC-MEMSRevenue Recognition from Contracts with Customers

 

AcquisitionDisaggregation of STC-MEMSRevenue

 

On March 23, 2017,The Company’s primary revenue streams include fabrication services and product sales across multiple geographic regions primarily the Company entered into the Agreements withRF-SUNY, a New York State education corporation, on behalf of The State University of New York Polytechnic Institute,Americas, Asia and FRMC, an affiliate of RF-SUNY to acquire the STC-MEMS Business. The acquisition will allow the Company to internalize manufacturing, increase capacity and control its wafer supply chain for single crystal BAW RF filters. Akoustis will utilize the NY Facility to consolidate all aspects of wafer manufacturing for its high-band RF filters.Europe.

 

Smart Systems Technology & Commercialization Center (STC-MEMS) was created in 2010Fabrication Services

Fabrication services revenue includes Non-Recurring Engineering (“NRE”) and backend packaging services. Under these contracts, products are delivered to form a vertically integrated “one-stop-shop” in smart system and smart-device innovation and manufacturing. The facility was designed to provide its customers the capacity, infrastructure and operational capabilities in all areascustomer at the completion of semiconductor and advanced manufacturing, while covering a diverse numberthe service which represents satisfaction of markets including aerospace, biomedical, communications, defense, and energy. Located in Canandaigua, New York, just outside of Rochester, the STC-MEMS facility includes certified cleanroom manufacturing, advanced test and metrology,performance obligation as well as transfer of title. Depending on language with regards to enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date, related revenue will either be recognized over time or at a MEMS and optoelectronic packaging facility.point in time.

 

The Company acquired the STC-MEMS Business through its Akoustis NY, a Delaware corporation. Post-acquisition date, the Company also agreed to assume substantially all the on-going obligations of the STC-MEMS Business incurred in the ordinary course of business, including with respect to the 29 employees employed by RF-SUNY.  The purchase closed on June 26, 2017.

Product Sales

 

Acquisition Price

The purchase price paid for the transaction was an aggregateProduct sales revenue consists of approximately $4.58 million consistingsales of (i) $2.75 million in cash consideration, (ii) $96,000 in inventory, and (iii) a contingent real estate liability of approximately $1.73 million.

Recognizing and measuring the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree

The fair value of the purchase consideration issued to the sellers of the STC-MEMS Business was allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. The Company accounted for the STC-MEMS Business acquisition as the purchase of a business under GAAP under the acquisition method of accounting, as specified in ASC 805 “Business Combinations”,RF filters, which are primarily sold with contract terms stating that title passes, and the assetscustomer takes control, at the time of shipment. Revenue is then recognized when the devices are shipped, and liabilities acquired were recorded as of the acquisition date, at their respective fair values and consolidated with those of the Company. The fair value of the net assets acquired was approximately $6.3 million. The excess of the aggregate fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets over the consideration paidperformance obligation has been treated as a gain on bargain purchase in accordance with ASC 805. The purchase price allocation was based, in part, on management’s knowledge ofsatisfied. If devices are sold under contract terms that specify that the STC-MEMS Business andcustomer does not take ownership until the results of a third-party appraisal commissioned by management.

The Company utilizedgoods are received, revenue is recognized when the services of an independent appraisal company to assist it in assessingcustomer receives the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired. This assessment included an evaluation of the fair value of the real estate and fixed assets in addition to the intangibles acquired. The real estate was valued utilizing a combination of the income and cost approaches.  The fixed assets were valued utilizing a combination of the market and cost approaches.  The intangible asset, customer relationships, was valued utilizing the income approach. The valuation process also included discussion with management regarding the history and business operations of the STC-MEMS Business, a study of the economic and industry conditions in which the STC-MEMS Business competes and an analysis of the historical and projected financial statements and other records and documents. 

Recognizing and measuring goodwill or a gain from a bargain purchase

Management reviewed the assets and liabilities acquired and the assumptions utilized in estimating their fair values. Further revisions to the estimates were not deemed necessary and after identifying and valuing all assets and liabilities of the STC-MEMS Business, the Company concluded that recording a bargain purchase gain was appropriate and required under GAAP.


Purchase Consideration   
    
Amount of consideration: $4,576,591 
     
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value    
Land $1,000,000 
Building  3,000,000 
STC-MEMS equipment  2,124,650 
Inventory  96,049 
Customer relationships  81,773 
Net assets acquired $6,302,472 
     
Total net assets acquired $6,302,472 
Consideration paid  4,576,591 
Gain on bargain purchase $1,725,881 

Prior to this transaction, none of the parties negotiating on behalf of the Company had met any of the individuals negotiating on behalf of the sellers. Further, there were no agreements signed with any individuals negotiating this deal. Additionally, there were no related parties associated with this transaction.goods.

 

The following presentstable summarizes the unaudited pro-forma combined results of operationsrevenues of the Company withCompany’s reportable segments by geographic region for the STC-MEMS Business as if the entities were combined on July 1, 2015.year ended June 30, 2023 (in thousands):

 

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  June 30,  June 30, 
  2017  2016 
Revenues, net $4,195,374  $5,314,499 
Net (loss) allocable to common shareholders $(13,907,072) $(7,613,100)
Net (loss) per share $(0.82) $(0.57)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding  16,990,536   13,349,482 

  Fabrication
Services
Revenue
  Product
Sales
Revenue
  Total
Revenue
with
Customers
 
Americas $7,287  $3,892  $11,179 
Asia  1,503   11,493   12,996 
Europe  161   2,771   2,932 
Other     14   14 
Total $8,951  $18,170  $27,121 

 

The unaudited pro-forma resultsfollowing table summarizes the revenues of operations are presentedthe Company’s reportable segments for information purposes only. The unaudited pro-forma results of operations are not intended to present actual results that would have been attained had the acquisitions been completed as of July 1, 2015 or to project potential operating results as of any future date or for any future periods.year ended June 30, 2022, (in thousands):

  Fabrication
Services
Revenue
  Product
Sales
Revenue
  Total
Revenue
with
Customers
 
Americas $1,389  $2,388  $3,777 
Asia  484   8,146   8,630 
Europe     2,930   2,930 
Other     13   13 
Total $1,873  $13,477  $15,350 


The estimated useful life remaining on equipment and building acquired with the STC-MEMS Business is 3 to 5 years and 11 years, respectively.

Performance Obligations

 

The Company consolidated Akoustis NYhas determined that contracts for product sales revenue and fabrication services revenue involve one performance obligation, which is delivery of the final product.

Contract Balances

The Company records a receivable when the title for goods has transferred. Generally, all sales are contract sales (with either an underlying contract or purchase order), resulting in all receivables being contract receivables. When invoicing occurs prior to revenue recognition a contract liability is recorded.

The following table summarizes the changes in the opening and closing balances of the Company’s contract asset (included in Other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet) and contract liability (included as Deferred revenue on the Consolidated Balance Sheet) for the years ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 (in thousands):

  Contract
Assets
  Contract
Liabilities
 
Balance, June 30, 2022 $923  $286 
Closing, June 30, 2023  1,894   70 
Increase/(Decrease)  971   (216)
         
Balance, June 30, 2021 $411  $41 
Closing, June 30, 2022  923   286 
Increase/(Decrease)  512   245 

The amount of revenue recognized in the year ended June 30, 2022 that was included in the opening contract liability balance consisted of $0.3 million that related to filter product sales.

Contract assets are recorded when revenue recognized exceeds the amount invoiced. The difference between the opening and closing balances of the Company’s contract assets and contract liabilities primarily results from the timing difference between the Company’s performance and the customer’s payment. The amount of contract assets invoiced in the year ended June 30, 2023 that was included in the opening contract asset balance was $0.9 million, which primarily related to non-recurring engineering business.

Backlog of Remaining Customer Performance Obligations

As of June 30, 2023, the Company had partially unsatisfied performance obligations related to contracts with an original expected duration of greater than one year. Revenue expected to be recognized from these performance obligations was $40 thousand as of June 30, 2023. The Company’s backlog may vary significantly each reporting period based on the closing datetiming of major new contract commitments. In addition, our customers have the right, under some infrequent circumstances, to terminate contracts or defer the timing of the agreement,Company’s services and the results of operationstheir payments to us.


Note 5: Inventory

Inventory consisted of the Company include thatfollowing as of Akoustis NY. The Company recognized net revenues attributable to Akoustis NY of $0 and recognized net losses of $171,000 during the period June 26, 2017 through June 30, 2017; driven by wages2023 and fringe benefits of $126,000.June 30, 2022 (in thousands):

  June 30,
2023
  

June 30,

2022

 
Raw Materials $1,574  $1,077 
Work in Process  3,741   1,061 
Finished Goods  2,233   1,956 
Total Inventory $7,548  $4,094 


Note 5.6. Property and equipment, net

 

Property and equipment consisted of the following:following as of June 30, 2023 and 2022 (in thousands):

 

  Estimated
Useful Life
 June 30,
2017
  June 30,
2016
 
Land n/a $1,000,000  $ 
Research and development equipment 3 – 10 years  1,851,427   226,372 
Computer equipment 5 years  16,783   16,783 
Furniture and fixtures 5 – 10 years  3,725   3,725 
STC-MEMS equipment 3 – 5 years  2,124,650    
Building 11 years  3,000,000    
Leasehold improvements *  3,240   3,240 
     7,999,825   250,120 
Less: Accumulated depreciation    (146,011)  (43,135)
Total   $7,853,814  $206,985 
  June 30,
2023
  June 30,
2022
  Estimated
Useful Life
Land $1,000  $1,000  n/a
Building & leasehold improvements  9,016   7,715  11 years *
Equipment  71,151   57,750  2-10 years
Computer equipment and software  3,168   1,966  3-5 years
Total  84,335   68,431   
Less: Accumulated depreciation  (26,509)  (17,274)  
Total $57,826  $51,157   

 

(*) Amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter.

(*)Leasehold improvements which are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter.

 

The Company recorded depreciation expense of $102,876$9.2 million and $34,828$6.8 million for the years ended June 30, 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively.

 

As of June 30, 2017, research and development fixed assets2023, equipment with a net book value totaling $1,062,496 were$7.1 million had not been placed in service and therefore was not depreciated during the period. As of June 30, 2022, fixed assets with a net book value totaling $14.5 million had not been placed in service and therefore was not depreciated during the period.


Note 7. Business Acquisitions

 

Note 6. Intangible assetsGrinding & Dicing Services, Inc.

On January 1, 2023 (the “Closing Date”), the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Akoustis, Inc. (the “Purchaser”), entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with GDSI and the stockholders of GDSI (the “Sellers”). Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Purchaser acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of GDSI (such acquisition, the “Transaction”). The acquisition is expected to support a strategy to reshore operations to the United States, improve rapid prototype and development cycle time, and provide prototype cost savings.

 

The Company’s intangible assetstotal consideration paid to the Sellers at closing of the Transaction consisted of $13.9 million in cash and approximately $1.7 million of shares of the following:Company’s common stock. In addition, the Company issued a secured promissory note (the “Promissory Note”) in the original principal amount of $4.0 million issued by the Purchaser to the Sellers’ representative. The Sellers’ representative is a current employee of the Company. The Promissory Note does not bear interest, is subject to partial prepayment (reduction of the outstanding principal amount down to $1.3 million) on the second anniversary of the Closing Date, and is payable in full on the third anniversary of the Closing Date. The Purchaser can reduce the principal amount of the Promissory Note (i) to satisfy certain post-closing adjustments to the Transaction purchase price, (ii) to satisfy the Sellers’ indemnification obligations under the Purchase Agreement, and (iii) if GDSI’s President is terminated for cause or due to disability or resigns without good reason prior to maturity the Promissory Note will be cancelled in its entirety. The Promissory Note is secured by certain of the Purchaser’s and GDSI’s assets. In the event of certain events of default, including failure to pay amounts due under the Promissory Note and certain bankruptcy events, the outstanding principal amount of the Promissory Note will become immediately due.

 

The purchase price was preliminarily allocated based on the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows (in thousands):

  Estimated 
useful life
  June 30, 2017  June 30, 2016 
Patents  15 years  $135,291  $74,562 
Customer relationships  14 years   81,773    
Less: Accumulated amortization      (12,097)  (4,889)
Subtotal      204,967   69,673 
Trademarks  —     1,560   1,560 
Intangible assets, net     $206,527  $71,233 

 

Consideration:   
Cash paid $13,915 
Common stock  1,690 
Liabilities cancelled  (88)
Total consideration $15,517 
     
Cash $334 
Fixed assets  2,538 
Other tangible assets  1,366 
Intangible assets  8,289 
Goodwill  6,508 
Deferred tax liabilities  (2,394)
Liabilities assumed  (1,124)
Total assets acquired $15,517 

The Company will continue to evaluate the fair market value and other estimates of certain assets, liabilities and tax estimates over the measurement period (up to one year from the acquisition date) as provided for in ASC 805-10.

The fair values of the intangible assets acquired included trade names of $0.19 million, developed technology of $1.98 million and customer relationships of $6.11 million and the provisional value of the fixed assets acquired was $2.5 million.

The fair value of the trade names acquired was determined based on an income approach using the “relief-from-royalty” method which estimated the value of the intangible asset by discounting the future cash flows of the asset to present value. Key inputs include a royalty rate of 0.5% and a discount rate of 19.0% as of the valuation date. The acquired trademarks assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of five years.

The fair value of the developed technology acquired was determined based on an income approach using the “relief-from-royalty” method which estimated the value of the intangible asset by discounting the future cash flows of the asset to present value. Key inputs include a royalty rate of 5% and a discount rate of 19.0% as of the valuation date. The acquired developed technology assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of seven years.


The fair value of the customer relationships acquired was determined based on an income approach using the “multi-period excess earnings” method in which the value of the intangible asset is determined by discounting the future cash flows of the asset to present value. Key inputs include a discount rate of 19.0% and an attrition rate of 7.5% as of the valuation date. These customer relationships are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful life of seven years.

The fair value of the fixed assets acquired was primarily determined using a cost approach and used the original cost of the asset as the key input. The acquired fixed assets are being depreciated over their estimated useful life of 5 years.

The goodwill resulting from the acquisition of GDSI, which has been recorded amortization expensein the Fabrication Services segment, is attributed to synergies and other benefits that are expected to be generated from this transaction and is not deductible for income tax purposes. During the year ended June 30, 2023, the Company recorded acquisition costs associated with the acquisition of $7,208GDSI totaling $0.2 million in “General and $3,339administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. 

Revenues included in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 20172023 from this acquisition for the period subsequent to the closing of the transaction was approximately $3.8 million. Loss from operations included in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2023 from this acquisition for the period subsequent to the closing of the transaction was approximately $1.4 million.

RFM Integrated Devices, Inc.

On October 15, 2021, the Company acquired a majority ownership position in RFM Integrated Device, Inc. (“RFMi”), a fabless supplier of acoustic wave RF resonators and 2016, respectively.filters, to expand product offerings and provide access to new markets. The Company acquired the 51% ownership interest in RFMi from Tai-Saw Technology Co., Ltd. (“TST”) in exchange for $6.0 million in cash and approximately $2.3 million payable in common stock of the Company. On April 29, 2022, the Company exercised its option to acquire the remaining 49% ownership interest in RFMi from TST for an additional $3.5 million in cash and approximately 420,053 shares of common stock of the Company with a fair value at closing of $1.9 million.

Additionally, earn-out payments payable in cash and/or shares of common stock of the Company may be payable to TST based on the achievement of sales targets for RFMi products in each of calendar year 2022 and 2023, with potential payouts in the range of $0 to $3.0 million. The estimated fair value of the associated liability was based on the present value of the expected future payouts resulting from the projected RFMi product sales, applying a volatility rate of 30% against those future projected revenues and using a discount rate of 9.9% and 10.2% for the first and second earnouts, respectively, and thus represented a Level 3 fair value measurement. The contingent consideration is re-measured to fair value at each reporting date until the contingency is resolved, and those changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. The Company has determined that the sales targets for calendar year 2022 were not met and the related earnout payment is not owed. The fair value of the contingent consideration decreased $1.4 million during the year ended June 30, 2023.

The purchase price was allocated based on the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows (in thousands):

Consideration:   
Cash paid $9,500 
Common stock  4,162 
Fair value of contingent consideration  1,099 
Total consideration $14,761 
     
Cash $1,921 
Other tangible assets  1,346 
Intangible assets  9,452 
Goodwill  8,051 
Liabilities assumed  (1,871)
Deferred tax liability  (1,980)
Noncontrolling interest acquired $(2,158)
Total assets acquired $14,761 

The fair value of the trademarks acquired was determined based on an income approach using the “relief-from-royalty” method which estimated the value of the intangible asset by discounting the future cash flows of the asset to present value. Key inputs include a royalty rate of 3% and a discount rate of 18.0% as of the valuation date. The acquired trademarks assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of five years.

The fair value of the developed technology acquired was determined based on an income approach using the “relief-from-royalty” method which estimated the value of the intangible asset by discounting the future cash flows of the asset to present value. Key inputs include a royalty rate of 4% and a discount rate of 18.0% as of the valuation date. The acquired developed technology assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of seven years.

The fair value of the customer relationships acquired was determined based on an income approach using the “multi-period excess earnings” method in which the value of the intangible asset is determined by discounting the future cash flows of the asset to present value. Key inputs include a discount rate of 18.0%, an attrition rate of 5% and an operating expense adjustment factor of 5% as of the valuation date. These customer relationships are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful life of seven years.


The fair value of the noncontrolling interest was determined by applying a lack of control discount of 16.7% to the implied fair value based on the total consideration paid for the 51% ownership.

The goodwill resulting from the acquisition of RFMi, which has been recorded in the RF Product segment, is attributed to synergies and other benefits that are expected to be generated from this transaction and is not deductible for income tax purposes. During the year ended June 30, 2022, the Company recorded acquisition costs associated with the acquisition of RFMi totaling $0.1 million in “General and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. 

Revenues included in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2022 from this acquisition for the period subsequent to the closing of the transaction was approximately $5.7 million. Loss from operations included in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2022 from this acquisition for the period subsequent to the closing of the transaction was approximately $0.4 million. Also included in the loss from operations in the year ended June 30, 2022 is expense of approximately $347 thousand relating to adjustments to the fair value of earnout contingent consideration described below.

Pro Forma Results

 

The following table outlines estimatedunaudited pro forma financial information summarizes the results of operations for year ended June 30, 2022 and 2023, as if the RFMi and GDSI acquisitions had been completed as of July 1, 2021 (in thousands). The pro forma results were calculated applying the Company’s accounting policies and include the effects of adjustments related to the amortization charges from the acquired intangibles. The unaudited pro forma information does not purport to be indicative of the results that would have been obtained if the acquisitions had actually occurred at the beginning of the year prior to acquisition, nor of the results that may be reported in the future.

  Years Ended
June 30,
 
  2023  2022 
  Unaudited
Proforma
  Unaudited
Proforma
 
Revenues $30,701  $24,500 
Net Loss $(65,747) $(58,850)
Net Loss per share $(1.03) $(1.07)

Note 8: Goodwill

The Company performs an annual test for goodwill impairment during our last fiscal quarter. Based on a qualitative assessment, the Company determined that there was no impairment to our goodwill as of June 30, 2023. The Company will also test for impairment between annual test dates if an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate the carrying amount may be impaired.

During the year ended June 30, 2023, the Company did not identify any events or circumstances that would require an interim goodwill impairment test. The Company does not amortize goodwill as it has been determined to have an indefinite useful life. The carrying amount of goodwill as of June 30, 2023 was $14.6 million.

Note 9: Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consisted of the following as of June 30, 2023 (in thousands):

  Gross
Carrying
Amount
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Net
Carrying
Amount
  Weighted
Average Useful
Life in Years
 
Trademarks $900  $(258) $642   5 
Developed Technology $3,867  $(581) $3,286   10 
Customer Relationships $13,569  $(2,256) $11,313   7 
Total $18,336  $(3,095) $15,241     

Intangible assets consisted of the following as of June 30, 2022 (in thousands):

  Gross
Carrying
Amount
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Net
Carrying
Amount
  Weighted
Average Useful
Life in Years
 
Trademarks $702  $(99) $603   5 
Developed Technology $1,911  $(221) $1,690   10 
Customer Relationships $7,455  $(754) $6,701   7 
Total $10,068  $(1,074) $8,994     


Amortization expense totaled $2 million for the year ended June 30, 2023. Estimated future annual amortization expense of intangible assets for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter:thereafter are as follows (in thousands):

 

June 30,    
2018  $14,811 
2019   14,811 
2020   14,811 
2021   14,811 
2022   14,811 
Thereafter   130,912 
Total  $204,967 
       
2024 $2,618 
2025 $2,618 
2026 $2,618 
2027 $2,519 
2028  2,458 
Thereafter $2,410 
Total $15,241 

 


Note 7.10. Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the following at June 30, 20172023 and June 30, 2016:2022 (in thousands): 

 

 June 30, 2017  June 30, 2016  June 30,
2023
 June 30,
2022
 
Accounts payable $494,515  $73,400  $3,979 $3,630 
Accrued salaries and benefits  274,050   21,376  4,781 4,641 
Accrued bonuses     126,575 
Accrued stock-based compensation  399,157   179,079 
Accrued good received not invoiced 3,700 1,472 
Accrued professional fees 2,248 704 
Other accrued expenses  168,646   143,216   2,319  757 
Totals $1,336,368  $543,646  $17,027 $11,204 

 

Note 8. Derivative Liabilities11.  Notes Payable

 

Upon closingConvertible Senior Notes due 2027

The following table summarizes convertible debt as of private placements on May 22, 2015 andJune 30, 2023 (in thousands):

  Maturity
Date
 Stated
Interest
Rate
  Conversion
Price
  Face
Value
  Remaining
Debt
(Discount)
  Fair Value of
Embedded
Derivatives
  Carrying
Value
 
Long Term convertible notes payable                    
6.0% Convertible Senior Notes 06/15/2027  6.00% $4.71  $44,000  $(2,733) $2,080  $43,347 
Ending Balance as of June 30, 2023           $44,000  $(2,733) $2,080  $43,347 

The following table summarizes convertible debt as of June 30, 2022 (in thousands):

  Maturity
Date
 Stated
Interest
Rate
  Conversion
Price
  Face
Value
  Remaining
Debt
(Discount)
  Fair Value of
Embedded
Derivatives
  Carrying
Value
 
Long Term convertible notes payable                    

6.0% Convertible Senior Notes

 06/15/2027  6.00% $4.71  $44,000  $(3,297) $3,028  $43,731 
Ending Balance as of June 30, 2022           $44,000  $(3,297) $3,028  $43,731 

On June 9, 2015,2022, the Company issued 298,551$44.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 6.0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2027 (the “Notes”) guaranteed by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Akoustis, Inc. (the “Guarantor”).

The Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture (the “Indenture”), dated June 9, 2022, among the Company, the Guarantor and 26,099 warrants, respectively,The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. The Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.0% per year until maturity on June 15, 2027 (the “Maturity Date”). Interest on the Notes accrues from the date of issuance or from the most recent date to purchasewhich interest has been paid and is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on December 15, 2022. At the same numberCompany’s option, interest may be paid in cash and/or freely tradable shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to certain limitations, valued at 95% of the volume weighted average price of the common stock for the ten trading days ending on and including the trading day immediately preceding the interest payment date. The Company will settle conversions of the Notes through delivery of shares of Common Stockcommon stock of the Company in accordance with an exercisethe terms of the Indenture. The initial conversion price for the Notes is approximately $4.71 per share.


Conversion

On or after December 9, 2022, holders of the Notes may convert all or any portion of their Notes, in multiples of $1,000 principal amount, at their option at any time prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the Maturity Date. If any Notes are converted prior to June 9, 2025 (the “Interest Make-Whole Date”), the Company will make a payment to the holder of such Notes equal to the sum of the remaining scheduled payments of interest that would have been made on the Notes to be converted had such Notes remained outstanding from the conversion date through and including the Interest Make-Whole Date. The Company will have the option to pay such Interest Make-Whole Payment in cash and/or common stock, subject to certain limitations, valued at 95% of the volume weighted average price of $1.50the common stock for the ten trading days ending on and including the trading day immediately preceding the redemption date.

Issuer Redemption

The Company may redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time on or after June 9, 2023 at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest on such principal, if any, up to the redemption date. The Notes will become subject to the Company’s right to redeem as follows: (i) on or after June 9, 2023, up to one-third of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes initially issued; (ii) on or after June 9, 2024, up to two-thirds of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes initially issued; and (iii) on or after June 9, 2025, up to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes initially issued; provided, that at any time the Company exercises the redemption right, (1) the closing sale price per share of the Company’s common stock is greater than 150% of the then-effective conversion price for each of 20 consecutive days of the 30 consecutive trading day period immediately preceding the Company’s redemption notice and (2) a registration statement registering the resale of all shares of common stock into which the principal amount of the Notes is convertible and all shares of common stock issuable as interest or as Interest Make-Whole Payments upon conversion or redemption of any Notes is effective and a five-year termcurrent prospectus related thereto remains available throughout the period from the date the redemption notice is delivered to the placement agent. Upon closingholders to and including the redemption date. If the Company redeems the Notes prior to the Interest Make-Whole Date, the holder will also receive an interest make-whole payment equal to the remaining scheduled interest payments that would have been made on the notes redeemed had such notes remained outstanding through the Interest Make-Whole Date (an “Interest Make-Whole Payment”). The Company will have the option to pay such Interest Make-Whole Payment in cash and/or common stock, subject to certain limitations, valued at 95% of the volume weighted average price of the common stock for the ten trading days ending on and including the trading day immediately preceding the redemption date.

Fundamental Change

If the Company undergoes a “qualifying fundamental change,” as defined in the Indenture, under certain circumstances holders who convert their Notes in connection with such a qualifying fundamental change will be entitled to receive, at each holder’s option either (i) a “qualifying fundamental change payment” with respect to such converted Notes based on a make-whole table set forth in the Indenture, or (ii) if greater, the amount of any Interest Make-Whole Payment due in respect of the converted Notes. Subject to certain limitations, qualifying fundamental change payments will be made all in shares of common stock unless the Company gives written notice to the Note holders that it intends to make such payments either all or partially in cash. For purposes of determining any cash payment to be made in respect of a private placementqualifying fundamental change payment, each share of common stock will be valued at 95% of the “Stock Price” (as determined in April 2016,accordance with the Company issued 153,713 warrants to purchase the same number of shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $1.60 and a five-year term to the placement agent. The Company identified certain put features embedded in the warrants that potentially could result in a net cash settlement, requiring the Company to classify the warrants as a derivative liability.Indenture).

  

DuringThe Company analyzed the components of the convertible notes for embedded derivatives and the application of the corresponding accounting treatment. This analysis determined that certain features of the notes represented derivatives that require bifurcation from the host contract. The fair value of these components of $3.0 million was recorded as a debt discount and will be adjusted to fair value at the end of each future reporting period. The Company recorded total debt discount and debt issuance costs of $3.3 million, to be amortized over five years using an effective interest method. Debt discount and debt issuance costs include the fair value of the embedded features at the issuance date of $3.0 million and debt issuance costs paid totaling $0.3 million.

Interest expense on the Notes during the year ended June 30, 2017,2023 included contractual interest of $2,640 thousand and debt discount amortization of $564 thousand. Interest expense on the Notes during the year ended June 30, 2022 included contractual interest of $154 thousand and debt discount amortization of $29 thousand.

Promissory Note

The Company amendedissued a secured promissory note (the “Promissory Note”) in the existing warrant agreementsoriginal principal amount of $4.0 million issued by the Purchaser to eliminate the derivative feature. Upon executionSellers’ representative. The Sellers’ representative is a current employee of the revised agreements,Company. The Promissory Note does not bear interest, is subject to partial prepayment (reduction of the outstanding principal amount down to $1.3 million) on the second anniversary of the Closing Date, and is payable in full on the third anniversary of the Closing Date. The Purchaser can reduce the principal amount of the Promissory Note (i) to satisfy certain post-closing adjustments to the Transaction purchase price, (ii) to satisfy the Sellers’ indemnification obligations under the Purchase Agreement, and (iii) if GDSI’s President is terminated for cause or due to disability or resigns without good reason prior to maturity the Promissory Note will be cancelled in its entirety. The Promissory Note is secured by certain of the Purchaser’s and GDSI’s assets. In the event of certain events of default, including failure to pay amounts due under the Promissory Note and certain bankruptcy events, the outstanding principal amount of the Promissory Note will become immediately due. The Promissory Note will be recognized on a totalstraight line basis over the term of 471,697 warrantsthe Promissory Note as compensation expense. The Company recorded compensation expense totaling $667 thousand for the year ended June 30, 2023 in “General and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations with a fair value of $2,200,219 were reclassified fromthe associated liability to equity.included in “Promissory notes payable” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


Note 12. Concentrations

 

Level 3 Financial Liabilities – Derivative warrant liabilitiesCustomers

 

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value onCustomer concentration as a recurring basis are summarized below and disclosed onpercentage of revenue for the consolidated balance sheet as ofyears ended June 30, 2017:2023 and 2022 are as follows:

  Year
Ended
06/30/2023
  Year
Ended
06/30/2022
 
Customer 1  14%  26%
Customer 2  18%  10%

Customer concentration as a percentage of accounts receivable for the years ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:

  Year
Ended
06/30/2023
  Year
Ended
06/30/2022
 
Customer 1  15%  26%
Customer 2  21%   

Vendors

Vendor concentration as a percentage of purchases for the years ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:

 

  CarryingYear
Ended
06/30/2023
  Fair Value Measurement UsingYear
Ended
06/30/2022
 
ValueVendor 1  Level 111%  Level 2Level 3Total
Derivative warrant liabilities$$$$$ 

Note 13. Stockholders’ Equity

 

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below and disclosed on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2016:Equity Offering Program

 

  Carrying  Fair Value Measurement Using 
  Value  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
                     
Derivative warrant liabilities $1,322,729  $  $  $1,322,729  $1,322,729 

The table below providesOn May 2, 2022, the Company entered into an ATM Sales Agreement with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, and Roth Capital Partners, LLC pursuant to which the Company may sell from time-to-time shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $50,000,000 (the “2022 Equity Offering Program”), of which $48 million remains available to be sold. On May 25, 2022, the Company announced that it was suspending sales under the 2022 Equity Offering Program. If, in the future, the Company determines to resume sales pursuant to the 2022 Equity Offering Program, it intends to notify investors by the filing of a summary ofCurrent Report on Form 8-K, other SEC filings or other public announcement.

No sales were made through the changes in fair value, including net transfers in and/or out, of all financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)2022 Equity Offering Program during the year ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:

  Fair Value
Measurement
Using Level 3
Inputs
 
  Total 
Balance, July 1, 2015 $205,144 
Issuance of derivative warrants  165,719 
Change in fair value of derivative warrant liabilities  968,840 
Reclassification of Derivative liability to Additional Paid in Capital  (16,974)
Balance, June 30, 2016 $1,322,729 
Change in fair value of derivative warrant liabilities  877,490 
Reclassification of Derivative liability to Additional Paid in Capital  (2,200,219)
Balance, June 30, 2017 $ 

The fair value of the derivative feature of the warrants on the issuance dates, at the balance sheet date and on the date of reclassification to equity were calculated using a binomial option model valued with the following weighted average assumptions: 

  

April 14,

2016

  

June 30,

2016

  January 19,
2017
 
Risk free interest rate  1.04%  1.08%  1.01%
Dividend yield  0.00%  0.00%  0.00%
Expected volatility  41%  44%  39%
Remaining term (years)  4.15 - 4.19   5.0   3.89 - 4.79 

Risk-free interest rate: The Company uses the risk-free interest rate of a U.S. Treasury Note with a similar term on the date of the grant.2023.

 

Dividend yield: The Company uses a 0% expected dividend yield as the Company has not paid dividends to date and does not anticipate declaring dividends in the near future.

Volatility: The Company calculates the expected volatilityUnderwritten Offering of the stock price based on the corresponding volatility of the Company’s peer group stock price for a period consistent with the warrant’s expected term.

Remaining term: The Company’s remaining term is based on the remaining contractual maturity of the warrants.

During the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company marked the derivative feature of the warrants to fair value and recorded a loss of $877,490 and $968,840, respectively, relating to the change in fair value.


Note 9.  Concentrations

For the year ended June 30, 2017, one vendor represented 11% of the Company’s purchases. For the year ended June 30, 2016, two vendors represented 28% and 14% of the Company’s purchases.

Note 10. Stockholders’ EquityCommon Stock

 

On December 15, 2016, in connection with the Company’s reincorporation from the State of Nevada to the State of Delaware,January 19, 2023, the Company filed a Certificateclosed an underwritten public offering of Incorporation with the State of Delaware, which, among other things, reduced the number of authorized shares of capital stock of the Company from 310,000,000 total shares consisting of (a) 300,000,000 shares of Common Stock and (b) 10,000,000 of $0.001 par value “blank check” preferred stock to 50,000,000 total shares consisting of (a) 45,000,000 shares of Common Stock and (b) 5,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock.

As of June 30, 2017 and 2016, there were no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding. 

The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense for the shares issued to consultants that have vested, which is a component of operating expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as follows:

     Stock-Based Compensation 
          
     For the Year Ended 
Month of Original Grant Shares
Issued
  June 30,
2017
  June 30,
2016
 
December 2015  230,000  $945,189  $342,811 
March 2016  60,000   261,214   71,786 
August 2016  40,000   147,600    
January 2017  50,000   194,776    
   380,000  $1,548,779  $414,597 

On March 10, 2016, the Company held a closing of a private placement offering (the “March 2016 Offering”) in which it sold 494,125 shares of Common Stock at a fixed purchase price of $1.60 per share (the “2016 Offering Price”), for aggregate gross proceeds of $790,600 (before deducting legal expenses of the March 2016 Offering).

On April 14, 2016, the Company held closings of a private placement offering (the “April 2016 Offering”) in which the Company sold 1,741,185 shares of Common Stock at a fixed purchase price of $1.60 per share (the “2016 Offering Price”), for aggregate gross proceeds of $2,785,896 (before deducting expenses for legal services and agent commissions of the April 2016 Offering).

The Company sold a total of 2,142,00012,545,454 shares of its Common Stock at a price to the 2016-2017 Offering Price,public of $2.75 per share pursuant to an underwriting agreement with closings in eachB. Riley Securities, Inc., as representative of November and December 2016 and January and February 2017, as well as 663,000the several underwriters named therein. The shares of Common Stock issued at closing included 1,636,363 shares issued pursuant to the 2017 Offering Price, for aggregate grossunderwriters’ over-allotment option, which was exercised in full. Gross proceeds were $16.7totaled $34.5 million before deducting commissionsthe underwriting discount and offering expenses of approximately $1.3$2.5 million resulting in net proceeds from the offering of approximately $32.0 million. Certain of the Company’s directors and officers participated in the offering by purchasing shares on the same terms and conditions as other investors. 

 


StockEquity incentive plans

2015 Equity Incentive Plan

 

On May 22, 2015,November 1, 2018, the Board of Directors adopted and on the same date the stockholders approved the 2015 EquityCompany’s 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2015(as amended, the “2018 Plan”), which reserved a total of 1,200,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance under the 2015 Plan. The 2015 Plan authorizedauthorizes the grant to participants of nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance grants.grants and other stock awards. The 2018 Plan initially reserved a total of 3,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance thereunder. On September 24, 2019, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to the 2018 Plan increasing the number of shares reserved for issuance thereunder to 6,000,000. On November 10, 2022, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to the 2018 Plan increasing the number of shares reserved for issuance thereunder to 12,000,000. As of June 30, 2023, 4,638,242, shares remained available for future grants under the 2018 Plan. The Company previously maintained the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”) and the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”). No additional shares will be issued under the 2015 Plan or the 2016 Plan. Effective December 15, 2016, equityThe Company settles awards are grantedissued under the Company’s 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, which was approved stockholders on the same date.all plans with newly issued common shares.

 

In addition, the number of shares of our Common Stockcommon stock subject to the 2015 Plan, 2016 Plan and 2018 Plan, any number of shares subject to any numerical limit in the 2016 Plan,Plans, and the number of shares and terms of any incentive award are expected toawards thereunder would be adjusted in the event of any change in our outstanding Common Stockcommon stock by reason of any stock dividend, spin-off, split-up, stock split, reverse stock split, recapitalization, reclassification, merger, consolidation, liquidation, business combination or exchange of shares or similar transaction.

 

Options granted under the 2015 Plan, 2016 Plan and 2018 Plan vest as determined by the Company’s board of directors and expire over varying terms, but not more than seventen years from the date of grant. In the case of an Incentive Stock Option that is granted to a 10% shareholder on the date of grant, such Option shall not be exercisable after the expiration of five years from the date of grant. Options for 160,000 shares of Common Stock were issued under the 2015 Plan to four non-employee directors in May 2015. No options have been awarded under the 2016 Plan.

 

The fair values of the Company’s options were estimated at the dates of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

 

Expected term (years)6.25
Risk-free interest rate1.29%
Volatility47%
Dividend yield0%
  June 30,
2023
  June 30,
2022
 
Exercise price $2.83 - $4.23  $3.79 - $10.15 
Expected term (years)  4.00 - 5.00   4.75 - 5.00 
Risk-free interest rate  3.49 - 4.59%  0.76 - 3.38%
Volatility  67 - 70%  66 - 67%
Dividend yield  0%  0%
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value of Options granted during the period  $1.95  $4.71 

 

Expected term: The Company’s expected term is based on the period the options are expected to remain outstanding. The Company estimated this amount utilizing the “Simplified Method” in that the Company does not have sufficient historical experience to provide a reasonable basis to estimate an expected term.

 

Risk-free interest rate: The Company uses the risk-free interest rate of a U.S. Treasury Note with a similar term on the date of the grant.

 

Volatility: The Company calculates the expected volatility of the stock price based onusing the corresponding volatilityhistorical volatilities of the Company’s peer groupcommon stock price for a period consistent withtraded on the options’ expected term.Nasdaq Capital Market.

 

Dividend yield: The Company uses a 0% expected dividend yield as the Company has not paid dividends to date and does not anticipate declaring dividends in the near future.

 


The following is a summary of the option activity:

 

 Options Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Options  Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
  Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (in years)
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in thousands)
 
Outstanding – July 1, 2015  160,000 $1.50 
Exercisable – July 1, 2015   $ 
Outstanding – June 30, 2022  3,020,002   6.49         
Granted     297,798   3.48         
Exercised                 
Forfeited/Cancelled       (161,763)  7.12         
Outstanding – June 30, 2016  160,000  1.50 
Exercisable – June 30, 2016  40,000  1.50 
Granted   
Exercised   
Forfeited/Cancelled     
Outstanding – June 30, 2017  160,000 $1.50 
Exercisable – June 30, 2017  80,000 $1.50 
Outstanding – June 30, 2023  3,156,037   6.61   3.50   231 
Exercisable – June 30, 2023  2,032,665   6.24   2.51   218 

 


As of June 30, 2017, theThe total intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable was $1,158,400 and $579,200, respectively. As ofexercised during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, the Company has $52,800 inunrecognized2023 and June 30, 2022 was $0 thousand and $286 thousand, respectively.

Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense attributableand weighted-average years to the outstanding options, which will be amortized over a period of 2.14 years.recognized are as follows (in thousands):

  As of June 30, 2023 
  Unrecognized stock-based
compensation
  Weighted-
average years
to be recognized
 
Options $1,771   1.91 
Restricted stock awards/units $9,838   2.06 

 

For the years ended June 30, 20172023 and 2016,2022, the Company recorded $27,932$9.4 million and $28,008,$10.2 million, respectively, in stock-based compensation related to stock options, which is reflected in total operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.operations as follows (in thousands):

  2023  2022 
Research and Development $3,692  $5,586 
General and Administrative  5,715   4,661 
Total $9,407  $10,247 

Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock Awards

 

IssuanceA summary of unvested restricted shares – employees and consultants

Restricted stock awards are considered outstanding at the time of execution by the Company(“RSAs”) and the recipient of a restricted stock agreement,unit awards (“RSUs”) outstanding as the stock award holders are entitled to dividend and voting rights. As of June 30, 2017,2023 and changes during the number of shares granted for which the restrictions have not lapsed was 1,352,265 shares.year ended is as follows:

 

  Number of
RSAs/RSUs
  Weighted
Average
Fair Value
per
Share/Unit
 
Outstanding - June 30, 2022  2,177,585  $8.30 
 Granted  2,135,760   3.20 
Vested  (1,030,674)  6.50 
Forfeited/Cancelled/Repurchased  (249,436)  7.54 
Outstanding – June 30, 2023  3,033,235  $5.39 


The Company recognizes the compensation expense for all share-based compensation granted based on theweighted average grant date fair value per share for directorsawards granted during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2023 and employeesJune 30, 2022 was $3.20 and the reporting period remeasured fair value for consultants.$8.16, respectively. The total fair value of restricted awards that vested during the award is recorded as share–based compensation expense over the respective restriction period. Any portion of the grant awarded to consultants, directors, employees, and other service providers as to which the repurchase option has not lapsed is accrued on the Balance Sheet as a component of accounts payable and accrued expenses. As of June 30, 2017 and 2016, the accrued stock-based compensation was $399,157 and $179,079, respectively. The Company has the right to repurchase some or all of such shares in certain circumstances upon termination of the recipient’s service with the Company, for up to 60 months from the date of termination (“repurchase option”). The shares as to which the repurchase option has not lapsed are subject to forfeiture upon termination of consulting and employment relationships.

In September 2015, the Company amended the original restricted stock agreement for certain award recipients. Pursuant to the amendment, 75% of the shares as to which the repurchase option had not lapsed as of September 30, 2015 will be released from the repurchase option on the third anniversary of the original effective date of the agreement. The remaining 25% of the shares will be released from the repurchase option on the fourth anniversary of the original effective date.   

The following is a summary of restricted shares:

Grant Date Shares
Issued
  Fair
Value (1)
  Shares
Vested
 
June 2014  307,876  $1,294,029   121,530 
July 2014  32,408   48,612   23,791 
August 2014  81,020   326,323   8,102 
September 2014  129,633   352,282   13,667 
March 2015  72,918   401,717    
October 2015  293,000   439,500    
November 2015  36,200   54,300    
December 2015  300,000   1,393,000   230,000 
January 2016  40,000   68,000    
March 2016  60,000   333,000   60,000 
June 2016  118,000   535,809    
August 2016  351,000   1,489,247   40,000 
January 2017  192,000   1,165,122    
February 2017  110,000   697,500    
March 2017  20,000   135,000    
   2,144,055  $8,733,441   497,090 


(1)– The fair value of the restricted stock awards as shown above is based on either the balance sheet date for consultants or grant date for employees.

In relation to the above restricted stock agreements for the yearfiscal years ended June 30, 20172023 and 2016,June 30, 2022 was $3.5 million and $5.1 million, respectively.

During the years ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense forof $6.5 million and $7.7 million, respectively related to the sharesRSAs and RSUs that have vested of $3,223,398 and $821,617, respectively.been issued to date.

 

As of June 30, 2017,2023, the Company had $3,966,899approximately $7.7 million in unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to the unvested shares.

 

Note 11. Commitments and contingenciesMarket Value Stock Unit Awards

 

Employment agreements

OnDuring the year ended June 15, 2015,30, 2023 the Company entered intoawarded certain employees grants of an aggregate of approximately 0.42 million RSUs with market value appreciation conditions (“MVSUs”) with a three-year employment agreement with the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). After the initial three-year term, the agreementweighted average grant date fair value of $7.60. The MVSUs will be automatically renewed for successive one-year periods unless terminated by either party on at least 30 days’ written notice prior toexpensed over the endrequisite service period. The terms of the then-current term.MVSUs include vesting provisions based on continued service. The CEO’s annual base salarynumber of shares of the Company’s common stock earned at vesting is $150,000 and is subject to increase or decrease on each anniversary as determined by the Board of Directors. The CEO is eligible, at the discretion of our Board of Directors, to receive an annual cash bonus of up to 100% of his annual base salary, which may be based on the Company achieving certain operational, financial or other milestones (the “Milestones”) that may be established byCompany’s stock price performance with amounts earned subject to a vesting multiplier ranging from 0% to 200%. If the Boardservice criteria are satisfied, the MVSUs will vest over 3 years.

A summary of Directors. unvested MVSUs outstanding as of June 30, 2023 and changes during the year ended is as follows:

  Number of
MVSUs
  Weighted
Average
Fair Value
per
Share/Unit
 
Outstanding - June 30, 2022    $ 
 Granted  415,000   7.60 
Vested      
Forfeited/Cancelled/Repurchased  20,000   7.86 
Outstanding – June 30, 2023  395,000   7.58 

The CEO is entitled to receive stock options or other equity incentiveweighted average grant date fair value per share for MVSU awards undergranted during the 2016 Plan asfiscal year ended June 30, 2023 was $7.60. No MVSU awards were granted during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. No MVSU awards vested during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2023 and when determined byJune 30, 2022.

During the Board,years ended June 30, 2023 and is entitled to receive perquisites and other fringe benefits that may be provided to, and is eligible to participate in any other bonus or incentive program established by2022, the Company for the executives. The CEOrecorded stock-based compensation expense of $0.9 million and his dependents are also entitled to participate in any of the employee benefit plans subject to the same terms and conditions applicable to other employees. The CEO will be entitled to be reimbursed for all reasonable travel, entertainment and other expenses incurred or paid by him in connection with, or$0.0 million, respectively related to the performanceMVSUs that have been issued to date.

As of his duties, responsibilities or services under his employment agreement,June 30, 2023, the Company had approximately $2.1 million in accordance with policies and procedures, and subjectunrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to limitations,the unvested MVSU shares.


Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Effective November 1, 2018, the Company adopted by us from time to time. In the event that the CEO is terminatedAkoustis Technologies, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan 2018 (the “ESPP”), which was approved by the Company without Cause (as defined in his employment agreement) or he resigns for Good Reason (as defined in his employment agreement) during the term of his employment agreement, the CEO would be entitled to (x) an amount equal to his annual base salary then in effect (payable in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices) for a period of 24 months commencingstockholders on the effectivesame date, of his termination (the “Severance Period”) (in the case of termination by the executive for Good Reason, reduced by any cash remuneration paidThe ESPP is intended to him because of any other employment or self-employment during the Severance Period), and (y) if and to the extent the Milestones are achieved for the annual bonus for the year in which the Severance Period commences (or, in the absence of Milestones, the Board of Directors has, in its sole discretion, otherwise determinedqualify as an amount“employee stock purchase plan” under Section 423 of the CEO’s annual bonus for such year), an amount equal to such annual bonus pro-rated for the portion of the performance year completed before the CEO employment terminated, (z) any unvested stock options, restricted stock or similar incentive equity instruments will vest immediately. For the duration of the Severance Period, the CEO will also be eligible to participate in our benefit plans or programs, provided the CEO was participating in such plan or program immediately prior to the date of employment termination, to the extent permitted under the terms of such plan or program (collectively, the “Termination Benefits”). If the CEO’s employment is terminated during the term of his employment agreement by the Company for Cause, by the CEO for any reason other than Good Reason or due to his death, then he will not be entitled to receive the Termination Benefits, and shall only be entitled to the compensation and benefits which shall have accrued as of the date of such termination (other than with respect to certain benefits that may be available to the CEO as a result of a Permanent Disability (as defined in his employment agreement).

On June 15, 2015, the Company also entered into two-year employment agreements with each of the Vice President of Business Development, the Vice President of Operations, and the then Chief Financial Officer. Each of these employment agreements had substantially the same terms as that of the CEO described above. These employment agreements expired on June 15, 2017.

On July 14, 2017, the Board named a new Chief Financial Officer who would also serve as the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer, effective as of the same date.


In connection with the election of the new Chief Financial OfficerCode. All regular full-time employees of the Company (including officers) and all other employees who meet the Company entered into a one-year employment agreement, dated July 14, 2017 (the “Employment Agreement”), with the Chief Financial Officer with essentially the same terms as the Chief Executive Officer employment agreement described above with the exceptioneligibility requirements of the following:

-Monthly living expenses of $1,600.

-Target annual bonus each fiscal year equal to 70% of his annual base salary, based on certain Company operation, financial, and other milestones set by the Board and/or its Compensation Committee.

-A restricted a stock award for 100,000 shares of Common Stock and options for 75,000 shares of Common Stock to be granted during the Company’s next open trading window. The Awards will be granted under the 2016 Plan and will vest 25% on each of the first, second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, subject to the CFO’s continued employment and the terms and conditions of the 2016 Plan and the applicable award agreements.

plan may participate in the ESPP. The termESPP provides eligible employees an opportunity to acquire the Company’s common stock at 85.0% of the Employment Agreement extends through July 31, 2018, andlower of the Employment Agreement will automatically renewclosing price per share of the Company’s common stock on the first or last day of each six-month purchase period. At June 30, 2023, 0.02 million shares were available for successive one- year periods unless either party gives at least 30 days written notice of non-renewalfuture issuance under this plan. The Company makes no cash contributions to the other party prior toESPP but bears the endexpenses of its administration. The Company issued 0.09 million, and 0.14 million shares under the then applicable term.ESPP in fiscal years 2023 and 2022, respectively. The Company settles awards issued under the ESPP with newly issued common shares.

 

Operating leasesFor the years ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, the Company recorded $0.25 million and $0.25 million, respectively, in stock-based compensation related to grants of ESPP shares.

Note 14. Leases

 

The Company leases office space in Huntersville, NC, pursuantCarrollton, TX, San Jose, CA and Taiwan and leases equipment in Canandaigua, NY. Its leases have remaining lease terms of up to five years, some of which include options to extend the leases for up to twenty-four months. Following adoption of ASC 842, lease expense excludes capital area maintenance and property taxes.

The components of lease expense were as follows (in thousands):

  Year
Ended
June 30,
2023
  Year
Ended
June 30,
2022
 
Operating Lease Expense $519  $348 

Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases was as follows (in thousands):

  Classification
on the
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
 June 30,
2023
  June 30,
2022
 
Assets        
Operating lease assets Other non-current assets $1,374  $1,126 
           
Liabilities          
Other current liabilities Current liabilities  439   313 
Operating lease liabilities Other non-current liabilities  976   811 

Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term:      
Operating leases  2.97 Years   3.42 Years 
         
Weighted Average Discount Rate:        
Operating leases  12.77%  10.03%


The following table outlines the minimum future lease payments for the next five years and thereafter (in thousands):

For the year ending June 30,   
2024 $589 
2025  606 
2026  374 
2027  66 
Thereafter  79 
Total lease payments (Undiscounted cash flows)  1,714 
     
Less imputed interest  (299)
Total $1,415 

Note 15. Commitments and Contingencies

Ontario County Industrial Development Authority Agreement

On February 27, 2018, the Company entered into a three-yearLease and Project Agreement (the “Lease and Project Agreement”) and a Company Lease Agreement (the “Company Lease Agreement” and together with the Lease and Project Agreement, the “Agreements”), each dated as of February 1, 2018, with the Ontario County Industrial Development Agency, a public benefit corporation of the State of New York (the “OCIDA”). Pursuant to the Agreements, the Company will lease agreement.for $1.00 annually to the OCIDA an approximately 9.995 acre parcel of land in Canandaigua, New York, together with the improvements thereon (including the Company’s New York fabrication facility), and transfer title to certain related equipment and personal property to the OCIDA (collectively, the “Facility”). The operatingOCIDA will lease providesthe Facility back to the Company for annual real estate tax and cost of living increases and contains predetermined increasesrent payments specified in the rentals payableLease and Project Agreement for the Company’s primary use as research and development, manufacturing, warehouse and professional office space in its business, and to be subleased, in part, by the Company to various existing tenants. The Company estimates substantial tax savings during the term of the lease. TheAgreements, which expire on December 31, 2028. In addition, subject to the terms of the Lease and Project Agreement, certain purchases and leases of eligible items will be exempt from the imposition of sales and use taxes. Subject to the terms of the Lease and Project Agreement, the OCIDA has also granted to the Company an exemption from certain mortgage recording taxes for one or more mortgages securing an aggregate rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basisprincipal amount not to exceed $12.0 million, or such greater amount as approved by the OCIDA in its sole and absolute discretion. Benefits totaling approximately $0.4 million provided to the Company through June 2023 pursuant to the terms of the Lease and Project Agreement are subject to claw back over the lease term.life of the Agreements upon certain recapture events, including certain events of default.

Litigation, Claims and Assessments

On October 4, 2021, the Company was named as a defendant in a complaint filed by Qorvo, Inc. (“Qorvo”) in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware alleging, among other things, patent infringement, false advertising, false patent marking, and unfair competition. The total lease rentalcomplaint alleges that the defendants misappropriated proprietary information, made misleading statements about the characteristics of certain of its products, and sold products infringing on certain of the plaintiff’s patents. The plaintiff seeks an injunction enjoining the Company from the alleged infringement and damages, including punitive and statutory enhanced damages, in an unspecified amount. The Company filed a motion to dismiss all of the claims other than the direct patent infringement claims, but the court permitted the plaintiff to file an amended complaint which the court subsequently determined was sufficient for pleading purposes. The Court denied the Company’s motion in May 2022. The Court held a claims construction hearing in November 2022, issuing its claim construction order on March 15, 2023. On February 8, 2023, Qorvo filed a second amended complaint adding allegations of misappropriation of trade secrets, racketeering activities, and civil conspiracy. The Company continues to develop its defenses and mitigation strategies, and intends to proceed in defending itself vigorously against the claims asserted by Qorvo. However, the Company can provide no assurance as to the outcome of such dispute, and such action may result in judgments against the Company for an injunction, significant damages or other relief, such as future royalty payments to Qorvo or restrictions on certain of the Company’s activities.

On April 20, 2023, the Company filed a complaint against Qorvo in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement by Qorvo of a patent licensed exclusively to the Company by Cornell University. The complaint alleges Qorvo’s willful infringement of the Cornell patent and seeks remedies including enhanced damages and attorneys’ fees. On July 24, 2023, Qorvo filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On August 11, 2023, Qorvo filed a motion to strike Akoustis’ infringement contentions. The Company intends to vigorously pursue its claims against Qorvo but can provide no assurance as to the outcome of this dispute.

Resolution of each of the matters described above may be prolonged and costly, and the ultimate result or judgment is uncertain due to the inherent uncertainty in litigation and other proceedings. An adverse result in the matters described above would have a material adverse effect on the Company and its business. Even if ultimately settled or resolved in the Company’s favor, the matters described above and other possible future actions may result in significant expenses, diversion of management and technical personnel attention and disruptions and delays in the Company’s business and product development, and other collateral consequences, all of which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, and results of operations. Any out-of-court settlement of the above matters or other actions may also have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations, including, but not limited to, substantial expenses, the payment of royalties, licensing or other fees payable to third parties, or restrictions on its ability to develop, manufacture, and sell its products.

From time to time, the Company may become involved in other lawsuits, investigations, and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses against such other pending claims and intends to vigorously pursue them. While it is not possible to predict or determine the outcomes of any such other pending actions, the Company believes the amount of liability, if any, with respect to such other pending actions, would not materially affect its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.


Tax Credit Contingency

The Company accrues a liability for indirect tax contingencies when it believes that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and that it can reasonably estimate the amount of the loss. The Company reviews these accruals and adjusts them to reflect ongoing negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and other relevant information. To the extent new information is obtained and the Company’s views on the probable outcomes of claims, suits, assessments, investigations or legal proceedings change, changes in the Company’s accrued liabilities would be recorded in the period in which such determination is made.

The Company’s gross unrecognized indirect tax credits totaled $0.1 million as of June 30, 2023 and $0.1 million as of June 30, 2022 and are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as a long-term liability. 

Note 16. Income Taxes

The components of income tax expense was $56,808 and $55,186(benefit) for the years ended June 30, 20172023 and 2016, respectively. The future minimum payments under this lease are $40,314.

The Company leases equipment for its Canandaigua, NY facility pursuant to a three-month lease agreement beginning on June 16, 2017. The aggregate rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The total lease rental expense was $8,125 and $0 for the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The future minimum payments under this lease2022 are $44,375. The Company anticipates renewing the lease for another three months and in process of finalizing terms and conditions.as follows (in thousands):

  June 30,
2023
  June 30,
2022
 
Current:      
Federal $(38) $134 
State and Local  (16)  15 
Total Current Tax Provision (Benefit)  (54)  149 
         
Deferred:        
Federal  (2,179)  (2,000)
State and Local  (215)  18 
Total Deferred Tax Provision (Benefit)  (2,394)  (1,982)
         
Total Tax Provision (Benefit) $(2,448) $(1,833)

Real Estate Contingent Liability

In connection with the acquisition of the STC-MEMS Business, the Company agreed to pay to Fuller Road Management Corporation a penalty, as set forth below, if the Company sells the property subject to the related Definitive Real Property Purchase Agreement within three (3) years after the date of such agreement for an amount in excess of $1,750,000, subject to certain enumerated exceptions. The penalty imposed shall be equivalent to the amount that the sales price of the property exceeds $1,750,000 up to the maximum penalty (“Maximum Penalty”) defined below:

   Maximum Penalty 
Year 1  $5,960,000 
Year 2  $3,973,333 
Year 3  $1,986,667 

The fair value of the contingent liability was calculated by an independent third-party appraisal firm, utilizing a present value calculation based on the probability the Company sells the property triggering the contingent penalty and a discount rate of 14.1%. The 14.1% discount rate was derived from a weighted average cost of capital, modified to include the effects of the bargain purchase price. As of June 30, 2017, the balance of the contingent liability was $1,730,542.


Note 12. Related Party Transactions

Consulting Services

AEG Consulting, a firm owned by one of the Company’s Co-Chairmen, received $15,195 and $10,238 for consulting fees for the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Company’s CEO and Vice President of Engineering participated in the closing of the 2016-2017 Offering that occurred on November 25, 2016 where they each purchased 20,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $5.00 per share. The Company’s Vice-President of Operations also purchased 2,000 shares of Common Stock in the closing at an aggregate purchase price of $10,000. One of the Co-Chairmen of the Company’s Board purchased 200,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $5.00 per share at an aggregate purchase price of $1,000,000. The brother of the CEO purchased 14,000 shares of Common Stock in the closing at an aggregate purchase price of $70,000.

The Company’s second Co-Chairman participated in the closing of the 2016-2017 Offering that occurred on December 27, 2016 where he purchased 2,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $5.00 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $10,000. A second brother of the CEO purchased 20,000 shares of Common Stock in the closing at an aggregate purchase price of $100,000.

Inventory Purchase

In March 2016, the Company purchased inventory from Big Red LLC (“Big Red”), a company formed by the CEO, the brother of the Company’s CEO, the Vice President of Operations and one additional party. The transaction for $43,544 was executed so the Company could pursue commercialization of the amplifier inventory purchased. The Company will utilize this inventory and related technology to process and sell the amplifiers. The CEO and Vice President of Operations assigned their interests in Big Red to other parties in March of 2016.

License Agreement

In April 2016, the Company entered into a license agreement with Big Red. The license agreement was executed so that the Company could pursue commercialization of amplifier inventory purchased from Big Red in March 2016. The Company will utilize this inventory and related technology to process and sell the amplifiers. Future revenue from sales utilizing the amplifier technology will result in a license fee paid to Big Red according to the following schedule:

Net SalesRoyalty Percentage
$0 - $500,0005.00%
$500,000 - $1,000,0004.00%
$1,000,000 - $2,000,0003.50%
$2,000,000 – $5,000,0003.00%
$5,000,001 and over2.00%

Note 13. Income Taxes

The Company had no income tax expense due to operating losses incurred for the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.


The provision for/(benefit from) income tax differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before the provision for/(benefit from) income taxes. The sources and tax effects of the differences are as follows: 

 

For the
Year Ended

June 30,
2017

 For the
Year Ended
June 30,
2016
  

For the
Year Ended

June 30,
2023

 

For the
Year Ended

June 30,
2022

 
Income taxes at Federal statutory rate (34.00)% (34.00)%  (21.00)%  (21.00)%
State income taxes, net of Federal income tax benefit (2.63)% (2.60)%  (1.35)%  (0.29)%
Permanent differences (6.36)% 0.22%
Tax Credits  (1.56)%  (1.49)%
Stock-based compensation  1.21%  0.28%
Other 6.49%    (0.53)%  0.14%
Change in Valuation Allowance 36.50% 36.09%  19.15%  19.32%
State tax rate change  0.00%  0.29%
Effect of changes in income tax rate applied to net deferred taxes  0.37%  0.04%
Income Tax Provision  0.00%  0.00%  (3.71)%  (3.00)%

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:follows, (in thousands):

 June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016  June 30,
2023
  June 30,
2022
 
Deferred Tax Assets     
Net Operating Loss Carryforwards $5,352,238  $1,711,488  $53,755  $47,031 
Share-based compensation 406,498 396,264 
Derivative liability  315,205 
Stock-based compensation  4,373   3,680 
Credits  3,753   2,725 
Research and development expenditures  8,145    
Other  (33,028)  (22,365  1,387   1,022 
  71,413   54,458 
Deferred Tax Liabilities        
Intangibles  (3,338)  (1,808)
Accumulated depreciation/basis differences  (9,945)  (7,158)
  (13,283)  (8,966)
 5,725,708 2,400,592         
Valuation Allowance  (5,725,708)  (2,400,592)  (58,130)  (45,492)
Net Deferred Tax Assets $ $  $  $ 

At June 30, 2017,2023, the Company had federal loss carryovers of approximately $14,600,000 of Federal and state NOL carryovers$34.2 million that may be available to offset future taxable income.

The NOL carry overs, if not utilized, will expire in stages beginning 2035.in 2034 if unused and federal loss carryovers of $213.1 million that will carry forward indefinitely. The North Carolina, New York, California, Florida, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania state loss carryovers of approximately $29.9 million, $11.5, $17.1, $0.4, $0.1, and $0.3 million, respectively, will begin to expire in 2029 if unused. Federal research credits of $3.7 million will expire beginning in 2034 if not utilized.


The company has not performed a detailed analysis to determine whether an ownership change under IRC Section 382 has occurred during the year ended June 30, 2023 or during any earlier year. If upon a complete analysis the company were to determine that an ownership change under Section 382 had occurred the effect of the ownership change would be the imposition of annual limitations on the use of NOL carryforwards. Any limitation may result in the expiration of a portion or all of the NOLs before utilization.

Based on a history of cumulative losses at the Company and the results of operations for the years ended June 30, 20172023 and 2016,2022, the Company determined that it is more likely than not it will not realize benefits from the deferred tax assets. The Company will not record income tax benefits in the financial statements until it is determined that it is more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred income tax assets. As a result of the analysis, the Company determined that a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets is required. The net change in the valuation allowance during the year ended June 30, 20172023 was an increase of approximately $3,325,000.$12.6 million.

As a result of the reverse merger that occurred on May 22, 2015, theThe Company’s previous NOL may be significantly limited. The Company has not performed a detailed analysis to determine whether an ownership change under IRC Section 382 or similar rules has occurred. The effect of an ownership change would be the imposition of annual limitation on the use of NOL carryforwards attributable to periods before the change which total approximately $421,000. Any limitation may result in expiration of a portion of the NOL before utilization. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertaingross unrecognized tax positions in selling, general and administrative expenses. The Company has not identified any uncertain tax positions requiring a reservebenefits totaled $0.5 million as of June 30, 2017.2023 and $0.4 million as of June 30, 2021. Of these amounts, $0.5 million and $0.4 million as of June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2022, respectively, represent the amounts of unrecognized tax benefit that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate in each of the fiscal years.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2022 is as follows (in thousands):

  June 30,
2023
  June 30,
2022
 
Beginning Balance $427  $326 
Additions based on positions related to the current year  70   80 
Additions for tax positions in prior years  44   21 
Reductions for tax positions in prior years      
Expiration of statute of limitations      
Ending Balance $541  $427 

The unrecognized tax benefit of $541 thousand at the end of June 30, 2023 is recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as a reduction to the carrying value of the gross deferred tax assets.

The Company’s fiscal 2018 federal and state returns and all subsequent years remain open for examination, as well as all attributes brought forward into those years. The Company is not currently under examination by any taxing authorities.

Note 17. Segment Information

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision–making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is its Chief Executive Officer. The Company operates in two segments, Fabrication Services, which consists of engineering review services and backend packaging services, and RF Filters which consists of amplifier and filter product sales

The Company evaluates performance of its operating segments based on revenue and operating profit (loss). Segment information for the years ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 are as follows (in thousands): 

  Fabrication
Services
  RF Filters  Total 
Year ended June 30, 2023         
Revenue $8,984  $18,137  $27,121 
Cost of revenue  5,512   24,725   30,237 
Gross margin  3,472   (6,588)  (3,116)
Research and development     33,243   33,243 
General and administrative  3,341   26,368   29,710 
Income/(Loss) from Operations $131  $(66,199) $(66,069)
             
Year ended June 30, 2022            
Revenue $1,870  $13,480  $15,350 
Cost of Revenue  2,452   17,035   19,487 
Gross Margin  (582)  (3,555)  (4,137)
Research and development     35,708   35,708 
General and administrative     20,710   20,710 
Loss from Operations $(582) $(59,973) $(60,555)
             
As of June 30, 2023            
Accounts receivable $1,124  $3,629  $4,753 
Property and equipment, net  2,394   55,432   57,826 
             
As of June 30, 2022            
Accounts receivable $572  $3,221  $3,793 
Property and equipment, net     51,157   51,157 


Note 18. Loss Per Share

 

Note 14. Subsequent EventsBasic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share is determined using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents. In periods when losses are reported, which is the case for the years ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 presented in these consolidated financial statements, the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding excludes common stock equivalents because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

 

The Company had the following common stock equivalents at June 30, 2023 and 2022:

In July 2017, 9,533 placement agent warrants issued

  June 30,
2023
  June 30,
2022
 
Convertible Notes  9,341,825   9,341,825 
Options  3,156,037   3,020,002 
Warrants     41,103 
Total  12,497,862   2,664,686 

Note 19. Fair Value Measurement

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon selling an asset or the price paid to transfer a liability on the measurement date. It focuses on the exit price in connectionthe principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants. A three-tier fair value hierarchy is established as a basis for considering such assumptions and for inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair values are as follows:

Level 1: Observable prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2: Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities.

The following table classifies the liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis into the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2023 and 2022:

  Fair value
at June 30,
2023
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Contingent consideration $  $  $  $ 
Derivative liabilities  2,080         2,080 
Total fair value $2,080  $  $  $2,080 

  Fair value
at June 30,
2022
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Contingent consideration $1,446  $  $  $1,446 
Derivative liabilities  3,028         3,028 
Total fair value $4,474  $  $  $4,474 

There were no transfers between levels during the year ended June 30, 2023.


The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of Level 3 contingent consideration that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

Contingent consideration June 30,
2023
 
Beginning balance $1,446 
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  (1,446)
Ending balance $ 

The fair value of contingent consideration liabilities that was classified as Level 3 in the table above was estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation in an option pricing framework with significant inputs that are not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 fair value measurement as defined in ASC 820. The significant inputs in the Level 3 measurement not supported by market activity include the probability assessments of expected future sales revenue of RFMi products in each of calendar year 2022 and 2023 and the volatility of those revenues, appropriately discounted considering the uncertainties associated with the 2016-2017 private placement offering, each having a termobligation, and as calculated in accordance with the terms of five yearsthe acquisition agreements. The development and an exercise pricedetermination of $5.00, were exercised.the unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements and the fair value calculations are the responsibility of the Company’s chief financial officer and are approved by the chief executive officer.

 


EXHIBIT INDEXDuring the year ended June 30, 2023, the Company reduced the contingent consideration liabilities to zero as the Company determined that the sales targets for calendar year 2022 were not met and the related earnout payment is not owed and the Company has estimated that the sales targets for calendar year 2023 will not be met.

 

The fair value of the contingent consideration liabilities on the balance sheet dates were valued with the following assumptions: 

  June 30,
2023
  June 30,
2022
 
Discount Rate         14.3% – 14.5%
Revenue volatility  30%   30%
Risk free interest rate     1.71% – 3.04%
Remaining term (years)  0.50   1.29 – 2.29 

Fair Value of Embedded Derivatives June 30,
2023
 
Beginning balance $3,028 
Initial fair value of make whole provision in convertible note   
Initial fair value of change in control provision in convertible note   
Change in fair value of convertible note derivatives  (948)
Ending balance $2,080 

The fair value of the embedded derivatives in our convertible note that were classified as Level 3 in the table above were estimated using a with and without approach on a lattice model framework with significant inputs that are not observable in the market and thus represent a Level 3 fair value measurement as defined in ASC 820. The significant inputs in the Level 3 measurement not supported by market activity include the probability and timing assessments of expected future change of control events, the volatility of our share price and the discount rate used to present value future cash payments under the convertible debt obligation. The development and determination of the unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements and the fair value calculations are the responsibility of the Company’s chief financial officer and are approved by the chief executive officer.

The fair value of the embedded derivatives in our convertible notes on the issuance date and at the balance sheet date were valued with the following assumptions: 

  June 30,
2023
  June 30,
2022
 
Stock Price $3.18  $3.70 
Volatility of stock price  70%  70%
Risk free interest rate  4.32%  3.01%
Debt yield  40.6%  41.5%
Remaining term (years)  4.0   5.0 

Note 20. Subsequent Events

The Company performed a review of events subsequent to the balance sheet date through the date the financial statements were issued and determined that there were no such events requiring recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Managements Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (1) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of June 30, 2023, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost- benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded based upon the evaluation described above that, as of June 30, 2023, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013 Framework) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2023.

The audited financial statements of the Company included in this annual report on Form 10-K include the results of acquisitions from their respective dates of acquisition. Management's assessment of internal control over financial reporting for the year ended June 30, 2023 does not include an assessment of GDSI, a majority owned subsidiary of the Company that was acquired on January 01, 2023. The financial statements of GDSI reflect total assets and net revenues constituting 14% and 14%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended June 30, 2023. Refer to "Note 7 – Business Acquisitions" for a description of the acquisition of GDSI.

A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of these inherent limitations, management does not expect that our internal controls over financial reporting can prevent all error and all fraud. Our system contains self-monitoring mechanisms, and actions are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified.

As we are not an “accelerated filer” under SEC rules, we are not required to provide an auditor’s attestation of management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2023.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the quarter ended June 30, 2023, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

Not applicable.


PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A relating to our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A relating to our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholders Matters

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A relating to our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A relating to our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A relating to our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders.


PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following Consolidated Financial Statements as set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this report are filed herein.

Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance SheetsF-4
Consolidated Statements of OperationsF-5
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ EquityF-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsF-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-8

Financial Statement Schedules

All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.


Exhibits

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit

Number

 

Description

2.1 
2.1Plan of Conversion, dated December 15, 2016(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 16, 2016)
   
2.2 Definitive Asset Purchase Agreement dated March 23, 2017 by and between The Research Foundation for the State University of New York and the Company(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 24, 2017)
   
2.3 Definitive Real Property Purchase Agreement dated March 23, 2017, by and between Fuller Road Management Corporation and the Company(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 24, 2017)
   
3.1 Articles of Conversion of the Company, as filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on December 15, 2016(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 16, 2016)
   
3.2 Certificate of Conversion of the Company, as filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 15, 2016(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 15,16, 2016)
   
3.3 Certificate of Incorporation, as filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 15, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 15,16, 2016)
   
3.4 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.43.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 1, 2020)
3.5Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on November 4, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 15, 2016)November 6, 2019)
   
10.1.1†3.6 Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on November 10, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 14, 2022)


Exhibit
Number
Description
4.1Description of Common Stock of the Registrant Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on August 21, 2020)
4.2Indenture, dated as of June 9, 2022 by and among the Company, Akoustis, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 10, 2022)
4.3Form of 6.0% Convertible Senior Note due 2027 (included in Exhibit 4.2)
4.4*Secured Promissory Note issued to the representative of sellers of Grinding & Dicing Services, Inc.
10.1.1†Akoustis, Inc. 2014 Stock Plan(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Transition Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on October 31, 2016)
   
10.1.2† FormDeclaration of Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement underAmendment to the Akoustis, Inc. 2014 Stock Plan between the Company (as assignee of Akoustis, Inc.) and each of Steve DenBaars, Mark Boomgarden and Arthur Geiss(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1210.2 to the Company’s CurrentQuarterly Report on Form 8-K10-Q filed with the SEC on May 29, 2015)November 14, 2017)
   
10.1.3†10.2.1† Form of Amendment to Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement under the 2014 Stock Plan between the Company and each of Steve DenBaars and Mark Boomgarden(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on June 29, 2016)
10.2Joint Development Agreement, dated February 27, 2015, between Akoustis, Inc. and Global Communication Semiconductors, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2015)
10.3Foundry Agreement, dated February 27, 2015, between Akoustis, Inc. and Global Communication Semiconductors, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2015)
10.4Form of 2015 Placement Agent Warrant for Common Stock of the Company in connection with the Company’s 2015 private placement offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2015)


10.5Form of 2015 Registration Rights Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2015)
10.6.1†Akoustis Technologies, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2015)
   
10.6.2†10.2.2† Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Akoustis Technologies, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2015)
   
10.6.3†10.2.3† Form of Restricted Stock Agreement, under the Akoustis Technologies, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan between the Company and each of Mark Boomgarden, Dave Aichele and Cindy Payne(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on June 29, 2016)
   
10.7†10.3† Employment Agreement between the Company and Jeffrey Shealy dated as of June 15, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 19, 2015)
   
10.8.1†10.4† Employment Agreement between the Company and David M. Aichele dated as of June 15, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 19, 2015)
10.8.2†Offer Letter from the Company to David M. Aichele(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 30, 2017)
   
10.9.1†10.5.1† Employment Agreement between the Company and Mark Boomgarden dated as of June 15, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 19, 2015)
10.9.2†Offer Letter from the Company to Mark D. Boomgarden(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 30, 2017)
10.10.1†Employment Agreement between the Company and Cindy C. Payne dated as of June 15, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 19, 2015)
10.10.2†Offer Letter from the Company to Cindy C. Payne(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 26, 2017)
10.11Form of 2016 Subscription Agreement between the Company and the investors party thereto(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 20, 2016)
10.12Form of 2016 Placement Agent Warrant for Common Stock of the Company in connection with the Company’s 2016 private placement offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 20, 2016)
10.13Form of 2016 Registration Rights Agreement(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 11, 2016)
10.14.1Form of Registration Rights Agreement by and among the Company and the investors in the 2016-2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 25, 2016)


10.14.2Amendment No. 1 to Registration Rights Agreement by and among the Company and the investors in the 2016-2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 28, 2016)
10.15Form of Placement Agent Warrant in the 2016-2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 28, 2016)
10.16.1Form of Subscription Agreement by and among the Company and the investors in the 2016-2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017)
10.16.2Form of Amended Subscription Agreement by and among the Company and the investors in the 2016-2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017)
10.17.1Placement Agent Agreement, dated December 8, 2016, by and between the Company and Katalyst Securities LLC in connection with the 2016-2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017)
10.17.2Amendment to Placement Agent Agreement, dated May 8, 2017, by and between the Company and Katalyst Securities LLC(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-218245) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2017)
10.18.1Placement Agent Agreement, dated December 12, 2016, by and between the Company and Drexel Hamilton, LLC in connection with the 2016-2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017)
10.18.2Amendment to Placement Agent Agreement by and between the Company and Drexel Hamilton LLC(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-218245) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2017)
10.19Placement Agent Agreement, dated December 14, 2016, by and between the Company and Joseph Gunnar & Co., LLC in connection with the 2016-2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017)
10.20Placement Agent Agreement, dated December 19, 2016, by and between the Company and Northland Securities, Inc. in connection with the 2016-2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017)
10.21Form of Amended and Restated Placement Agent Warrant for Common Stock of the Company in connection with the Company’s 2015 private placement offering and 2016 private placement offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017)
10.22.1†Akoustis Technologies, Inc. 2016 Stock Incentive Plan(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 16, 2016)
   
10.22.2†10.6.2† Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Akoustis Technologies, Inc. 2016 Stock Incentive Plan(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017)
   
10.22.3†10.7.3† Revised Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Akoustis Technologies, Inc. 2016 Stock Incentive Plan(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 23, 2017)

 


Exhibit
Number
Description
10.23.110.8.1Form of Subscription Agreement by and among the Company and the investors in the 2017 OfferingAkoustis Technologies, Inc. Director Compensation Program, effective September 7, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3510.8.1 to the Company’s Registration StatementCompany's Annual Report on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-218245)10-K filed with the SEC on May 25, 2017)September 12, 2022)
   
10.23.210.8.2Form of Amended Subscription Agreement by and among the Company and the investors in the 2017 OfferingAkoustis Technologies Inc. Director Compensation Program, effective August 26, 2022(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3610.8.2 to the Company’s Registration StatementCompany's Annual Report on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-218245)10-K filed with the SEC on May 25, 2017)September 12, 2022)
10.2410.09FormGrant Agreement, dated as of Registration Rights AgreementJuly 24, 2018, by and among the CompanyAkoustis Technologies, Inc., Akoustis, Inc. and the investors in the 2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-218245) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2017)
10.25FormTown of Placement Agent Warrant in the 2017 Offering(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-218245) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2017)
10.26Purchase Order for Deposition Tool(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 20, 2017)
10.27.1†Employment Agreement by and between John T. Kurtzweil and the Company, dated July 14, 2017Canandaigua (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 17, 2017)27, 2018)
10.10.1Akoustis Technologies, Inc. 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on September 13, 2019)
10.10.2†Amendment to 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix B of the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, filed September 24, 2019)
   
10.27.2†10.10.3† 

Amendment to 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 14, 2022)

10.10.4†Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement to be entered into by and between John T. Kurtzweil andunder the Company in connection with Mr. Kurtzweil’s employmentAkoustis Technologies, Inc. 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24.10 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on November 16, 2018)
10.10.5†Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the Akoustis Technologies, Inc. 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on November 16, 2018)
10.10.6†Form of Nonqualified Option Award Agreement under the Akoustis Technologies, Inc. 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on November 16, 2018)
10.11†Akoustis Technologies, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on September 13, 2019)
10.12Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 9, 2022, by and among the Company, Akoustis Inc. and the purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 10, 2022)
10.13Separation Agreement & Release, dated as of July 17, 2017)5, 2022, by and between the Company and Rohan Houlden (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on September 12, 2022)
10.14Independent Contractor Agreement, dated as of July 5, 2022, by and between the Company and Rohan Houlden (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on September 12, 2022)
10.15Lease Agreement, dated November 2019, by and between CB Office 10, Ltd. and RFM Integrated Device Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on September 12, 2022)
   
10.27.3†10.16* 

Form of OptionLease Agreement, to be entered intodated January 1, 2023, by and between John T. Kurtzweilamong Saira Haq, Trustee of the Haq Family Trust, and Saira Haq, Trustee of the Company in connection with Mr. Kurtzweil’s employment(incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 17, 2017)Non-Exempt Marital Trust dated May 26, 2006, and Grinding and Dicing Services, Inc.

   
21.110.17* Stock Purchase Agreement, dated January 1, 2023, by and among the Company, Akoustis, Inc., Grinding & Dicing Services, Inc. and its stockholders
21.1*Subsidiaries of the Company(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-218245) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2017)
31.1*23.1*Consent of Marcum LLP
31.1*Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer
31.2*Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
32.1*Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
32.2*Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

101§*
101*Interactive Data Files of Financial Statements and Notes.


Exhibit
Number
Description
101.INS*Inline XBRL Instance Document
   
101.ins*101.SCH* Instant DocumentInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
   
101.sch*101.CAL* Inline XBRL Taxonomy Schema DocumentExtension Calculation Linkbase Document.
   
101.cal*101.DEF* Inline XBRL Taxonomy CalculationExtension Definition Linkbase DocumentDocument.
   
101.def*101.LAB* Inline XBRL Taxonomy DefinitionExtension Label Linkbase DocumentDocument.
   
101.lab*101.PRE* Inline XBRL Taxonomy LabelExtension Presentation Linkbase DocumentDocument.
   
101.pre*104* Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Documentand contained in Exhibit 101).

 

*       Filed herewith

*Filed herewith
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
††Confidential portions of this exhibit have been omitted.

 


†       Management contract

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or compensatory plan or arrangement15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

AKOUSTIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Dated: September 6, 2023By:/s/ Jeffrey B. Shealy
Jeffrey B. Shealy
President and Chief Executive Officer

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SIGNATURE TITLEDATE
/s/ Jeffrey B. ShealyChief Executive OfficerSeptember 6, 2023
Jeffrey B. Shealy(Principal Executive Officer), Director
/s/ Kenneth E. BollerChief Financial OfficerSeptember 6, 2023
Kenneth E. Boller(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
/s/ Arthur E. GeissCo-Chairman of the BoardSeptember 6, 2023
Arthur E. Geiss
/s/ Jerry D. NealCo-Chairman of the BoardSeptember 6, 2023
Jerry D. Neal
/s/ Steven P. DenBaarsDirectorSeptember 6, 2023
Steven P. DenBaars
/s/ Jeffrey K. McMahonDirectorSeptember 6, 2023
Jeffrey K. McMahon
/s/ Suzanne B. RudyDirectorSeptember 6, 2023
Suzanne B. Rudy
/s/ J. Michael McGuireDirectorSeptember 6, 2023
J. Michael McGuire

/s/ Michelle PetockDirectorSeptember 6, 2023
Michelle Petock

54

63

iso4217:USD xbrli:shares