UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K 
(Mark One)
þANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 201527, 2018
or
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                   to
Commission File No. 1-7275

CONAGRA FOODS,BRANDS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 

Delaware 47-0248710
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
  
One ConAgra Drive222 W. Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1300
Omaha, NebraskaChicago, Illinois
 68102-500160654
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (402) 240-4000(312) 549-5000

 
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $5.00 par value New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  þ    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  þ    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  þ    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    þ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large"large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”" "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company" and “smaller reporting company”"emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer  þ Accelerated filer  ¨
Non-accelerated filer    ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company¨ Emerging growth company    ¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨     No  þ
The aggregate market value of the voting common stock of ConAgra Foods,Conagra Brands, Inc. held by non-affiliates on November 23, 201426, 2017 (the last business day of the Registrant’sRegistrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $15,124,310,966$14,207,433,670 based upon the closing sale price on the New York Stock Exchange on such date.
At June 28, 2015, 428,854,39224, 2018, 390,888,172 common shares were outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s 2015Registrant's 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2015"2018 Proxy Statement”Statement") are incorporated by reference into Part III.





Table of Contents
 
Item 1
Item 1A
Item 1B
Item 2
Item 3
Item 4
   
 
Item 5
Item 6
Item 7
Item 7A
Item 8
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 9
Item 9A
Item 9B
   
Item 10
Item 11
Item 12
Item 13
Item 14
   
Item 15
Item 16





PART I

This annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of risks, uncertainties, and other factors. For a discussion of important factors that could cause our results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements, please refer to Item 1A, Risk Factors and Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations below.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General Development of Business
ConAgra Foods,Conagra Brands, Inc. (“ConAgra Foods”, “Company”a Delaware corporation, together with its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company", “we”"we", “us”"our", or “our”"us"), is one of North America’s largest packaged food companies with branded and privateAmerica's leading branded food found in 99 percentcompanies. Guided by an entrepreneurial spirit, the Company combines a rich heritage of America's households, as well asmaking great food with a strong commercial foods business serving restaurants and foodservice operations globally. Consumers can find recognizedsharpened focus on innovation. The Company's portfolio is evolving to satisfy people's changing food preferences. Its iconic brands such as Banquet®, Chef Boyardee®, Egg Beaters®, Healthy Choice®, Hebrew National®, Hunt's®, Marie Callender's®,Orville Redenbacher's®, PAM®, Peter Pan®, Reddi-wip®, Hunt's®, Healthy Choice®, Slim Jim®, and Snack PackOrville Redenbacher's®, as well as emerging brands, including Alexia®, Angie's® BOOMCHICKAPOP®, Blake's®, Duke's®, and many other ConAgra Foods brands, along with food sold by ConAgra Foods under private brand labels, in grocery, convenience, mass merchandise, club, and drug stores. Additionally, ConAgra Foods supplies frozen potato and sweet potato products, as well as other vegetable, spice, bakery, and grain products, to restaurants, commercial, and foodservice customers.Frontera®, offer choices for every occasion.
We began as a Midwestern flour-milling company and entered other commodity-based businesses throughout our history. We were initially incorporated as a Nebraska corporation in 1919 and were reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in December 1975.January 1976. Over time, through various acquisitions and divestitures, we changedtransformed into the make-up of our company and focused on growing our branded, food businesses to become the leadingpure-play consumer packaged goods food company we are today. MakingWe achieved this shift involved acquiring a number ofthrough various acquisitions, including consumer food brands such as Banquet®, Chef Boyardee®, Marie Callender’s®, and Alexia®. Businesses we, Blake's®, Frontera®, Duke’s®, BIGS®, and divestitures. We have divested include our Lamb Weston business, Private Brands business, Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings business, JM Swank business, milling business, dehydrated and fresh vegetable operations, and a trading and merchandising business, packaged meat and cheese operations, and poultry, beef, and pork businesses, among others. Growing our food businesses has also been fueled by innovation, organic growth of our brands, and expansion into adjacent categories. We are focused on delivering sustainable, profitable growth with strong and improving returns on our invested capital.
On November 9, 2016, we completed the spinoff of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. ("Lamb Weston") through a distribution of 100% of our interest in Lamb Weston to holders, as of November 1, 2016, of outstanding shares of our common stock (the "Spinoff"). The transaction effecting this change was structured as a tax-free spinoff.
In January 2013, we acquired Ralcorp Holdings, Inc. ("Ralcorp"), a manufacturer of private branded food. Since the acquisition of Ralcorp, we focused on addressing executional shortfalls and customer service issues intended to improve operating performance for theour Private Brands business. However, after further review of the Private Brands business, we announced a change tochanged our strategic direction on June 30, 2015. In pursuit of our underlying objective of creating and maximizing long-term shareholder value, we announced our intent to divestdivested the Private Brands business for greater focus onin the best opportunities for growth in our branded and Commercial Foods businesses. We also plan to aggressively pursue cost reductions through our selling, general and administrative functions and productivity improvements to drive margin expansion, and to maintain our balanced capital allocation philosophy.
Our efficiency and effectiveness initiatives continue to be implemented with a high degreethird quarter of customer focus, food safety and quality, and commitment to our people.fiscal 2016.
Financial Information about Reporting Segments
We reportreflect our results of operations in threefive reporting segments: Consumer Foods, Commercial Foods,Grocery & Snacks, Refrigerated & Frozen, International, Foodservice, and Private Brands.Commercial. The contributions of each reporting segment to net sales, operating profit, and identifiable assets are set forth in Note 21 "Business Segments and Related InformationInformation" to the consolidated financial statements.
Narrative Description of Business
We compete throughout the food industry and focus on adding value for our customers who operate in the retail food foodservice, and ingredientsfoodservice channels.
Our operations, including our reporting segments, are described below. Our locations, including manufacturing facilities, within each reporting segment, are described in Item 2, Properties.
Consumer Foods

Reporting Segments
Our reporting segments are as follows:
Grocery & Snacks
The Consumer FoodsGrocery & Snacks reporting segment principally includes branded, shelf stable food products sold in various retail channels primarily in North America. Ourthe United States.
Refrigerated & Frozen
The Refrigerated & Frozen reporting segment principally includes branded, temperature-controlled food products are sold in a variety of categories (meals, entrees, condiments, sides, snacks, and desserts) in various retail channels across frozen, refrigerated,in the United States.
International
The International reporting segment principally includes branded food products, in various temperature states, sold in various retail and shelf-stable temperature classes. Major brands include: ACT II®, Banquet®, Blue Bonnet®, Chef Boyardee®, DAVID®, Egg Beaters®, Healthy Choice®, Hebrew National®, Hunt’s®, Marie Callender’s®, Orville Redenbacher’s®, PAM®, Peter Pan®, Reddi-wip®, Slim Jim®, Snack Pack®, Swiss Miss®, Van Camp’s®,foodservice channels outside of the United States.
Foodservice
The Foodservice reporting segment includes branded and Wesson®.customized food products, including meals, entrees, sauces, and a variety of custom-manufactured culinary products packaged for sale to restaurants and other foodservice establishments primarily in the United States.

1



Commercial Foods
The Commercial Foods reporting segment includesincluded commercially branded and private brandedlabel food and ingredients, which arewere sold primarily to commercial, restaurants,restaurant, foodservice, food manufacturing, and industrial customers. The segment's primary food items include: frozen potato and sweet potato items, as well asincluded a variety of vegetable, spice, and frozen bakery and grain productsgoods, which arewere sold under brands such asAlexia®,Lamb Weston® and Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings®.
Private Brands
The Private Brands reporting In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we sold our Spicetec and JM Swank businesses. These businesses comprise the entire Commercial segment principally includes private brand and customized food products which are sold in various retail channels, primarily in North America. The products include a varietyfollowing the presentation of categories including: bars, cereal, snacks, condiments, pasta, and retail bakery products. Subsequent to fiscal 2015, on June 30, 2015, we announced our plan to exit the Private BrandsLamb Weston as discontinued operations.
Unconsolidated Equity Investments
We have a number ofthree unconsolidated equity investments. Our most significant equity method investments includeinvestment is a milling business (see "Formation of Ardent Mills" below) and other domestic and international investments that produce and market potato products for retail and foodservice customers.business.
Acquisitions
On May 12, 2015,June 26, 2018, subsequent to the end of fiscal 2018, we entered into a definitive merger agreement with Pinnacle Foods Inc. ("Pinnacle") under which we plan to acquire all outstanding shares of Pinnacle common stock in a cash and stock transaction valued at approximately $10.9 billion, including Pinnacle's outstanding net debt. Under the terms of the merger agreement, Pinnacle shareholders will receive $43.11 per share in cash and 0.6494 shares of our common stock for each share of Pinnacle common stock held. The implied price of $68.00 per Pinnacle share is based on the volume-weighted average price of our stock for the five days ended June 21, 2018. The planned acquisition is expected to close by the end of calendar 2018 and remains subject to the approval of Pinnacle shareholders, the receipt of regulatory approvals, and other customary closing conditions.
In February 2018, we acquired Blake's All Natural Foods, a family-owned company specializing in all naturalthe Sandwich Bros. of Wisconsin® business, maker of frozen breakfast and organic frozen meals, including pot pies, casseroles, pasta dishes and other entrees.entree flatbread pocket sandwiches. This business is included in the Consumer FoodsRefrigerated & Frozen segment.
In July 2014,October 2017, we acquired TaiMei Potato Industry Limited, a potato processor in China. The purchase included property and equipment associated with making frozen potato products.Angie's Artisan Treats, LLC, maker of Angie's®BOOMCHICKAPOP® ready-to-eat popcorn. This business is primarily included in the Commercial FoodsGrocery & Snacks segment.
In September 2013,April 2017, we acquired frozen dessert production assets from Harlan Bakeries. The purchase included machinery, operating systems, warehousing/storage,protein-based snacking businesses Thanasi Foods LLC, maker of Duke’s® meat snacks, and other assets associated with making frozen fruit pies, cream pies, pastry shells, and loaf cakes. This business isBIGS LLC, maker of BIGS® seeds. These businesses are primarily included in the ConsumerGrocery & Snacks segment.
In September 2016, we acquired the operating assets of Frontera Foods, segment.Inc. and Red Fork LLC, including the Frontera®, Red Fork®, and Salpica® brands (the "Frontera acquisition"). These businesses make authentic, gourmet Mexican food products and contemporary American cooking sauces. These businesses are reflected principally within the Grocery & Snacks segment, and to a lesser extent within the Refrigerated & Frozen and International segments.
Discontinued Operations

Divestitures
In April 2014,the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we entered into an agreement to sell our Del Monte® processed fruit and vegetable business in Canada and completed the sale in July 2018, subsequent to the end of fiscal 2018. The assets of this business have been reclassified as assets held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we signed an agreement to sell our Wesson® oil business. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, the agreement was terminated. This outcome followed the decision of the Federal Trade Commission, announced on March 5, 2018, to challenge the pending sale. The Company is still actively marketing the Wesson® oil business and expects to sell it within the next twelve months. The assets of this business have been reclassified as assets held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented.
On November 9, 2016, we completed the saleSpinoff of a small snack business, Medallion Foods.our Lamb Weston business. As of such date, we did not beneficially own any equity interest in Lamb Weston and no longer consolidated Lamb Weston into our financial results. We previously reflected the results of this business within the Private Brands segment. We reflected the results of these operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
In September 2013,the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we completed the salesales of our Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings business ("Spicetec") and our JM Swank business for combined proceeds of $489.0 million. The results of operations of Spicetec and JM Swank are included in the assetsCommercial segment.
On February 1, 2016, pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2015, we completed the Lightlife® business.disposition of our Private Brands operations to TreeHouse Foods, Inc. ("Treehouse"). We previously reflected the results of this business within the Consumer Foods segment. We reflected the results of these operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Formation of Ardent Mills
On May 29, 2014, the Company, Cargill, Incorporated ("Cargill"), and CHS Inc. ("CHS") (collectively, the “Owners”), completed the formation of Ardent Mills, which combined the North American flour milling operations and related businesses operated through the ConAgra Mills division of ConAgra Foods and the Horizon Milling joint venture of Cargill and CHS. We reflected the operating results of our legacy milling business as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Our equity in the earnings of Ardent Mills is reflected in our continuing operations.

2



General
The following comments pertain to all of our reporting segments.
ConAgra FoodsConagra Brands is a branded consumer packaged goods food company that operates in many sectors of the food industry, with a significant focus on the sale of branded, private branded, and value-added consumer food, as well as foodservice items and ingredients. We use many different raw materials, the bulk of which are commodities. The prices paid for raw materials used in making our food generally reflect factors such as weather, commodity market fluctuations, currency fluctuations, tariffs, and the effects of governmental agricultural programs. Although the prices of raw materials can be expected to fluctuate as a result of these factors, we believe such raw materials to be in adequate supply and generally available from numerous sources. From time to time, we have faced increased costs for many of our significant raw materials, packaging, and energy inputs. We seek to mitigate higher input costs through productivity and pricing initiatives, and through the use of derivative instruments used to economically hedge a portion of forecasted future consumption.
We experience intense competition for sales of our food items in our major markets. Our food items compete with widely advertised, well-known, branded food, as well as private branded and customized food items. Some of our competitors are larger and have greater resources than we have. We compete primarily on the basis of quality, value, customer service, brand recognition, and brand loyalty.
Demand for certain of our food items may be influenced by holidays, changes in seasons, or other annual events.
We manufacture primarily for stock and fill our customer orders from finished goods inventories. While at any given time there may be some backlog of orders, such backlog is not material in respect to annual net sales, and the changes of backlog orders from time to time are not significant.
Our trademarks are of material importance to our business and are protected by registration or other means in the United States and most other markets where the related food items are sold. Some of our food items are sold under brands that have been licensed from others. We also actively develop and maintain a portfolio of patents, although no single patent is considered material to the business as a whole. We have proprietary trade secrets, technology, know-how, processes, and other intellectual property rights that are not registered.
Many of our facilities and products we make are subject to various laws and regulations administered by the United States Department of Agriculture, the Federal Food and Drug Administration, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and other federal, state, local, and foreign governmental agencies relating to the food safety and quality, sanitation, safety and health matters, and environmental control. We believe that we comply with such laws and regulations in all material respects


and that continued compliance with such regulations will not have a material effect upon capital expenditures, earnings, or our competitive position.
Our largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores,Walmart, Inc. and its affiliates, accounted for approximately 18%, 19%,24% of consolidated net sales for both fiscal 2018 and 20%2017 and 23% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.2016.
At May 31, 2015, ConAgra Foods27, 2018, Conagra Brands and its subsidiaries had approximately 32,90012,400 employees, primarily in the United States. Approximately 32%43% of our employees are parties to collective bargaining agreements. Of the employees subject to collective bargaining agreements, approximately 25%47% are parties to collective bargaining agreements scheduled to expire during fiscal 2016.2019. We believe our relationships with employees and their representative organizations are good.
Research and Development
We employ processes at our principal manufacturing locations that emphasize applied research and technical services directed at product improvement and quality control. In addition, we conduct research activities related to the development of new products. Research and development expense was $90.4$47.3 million, $101.8$44.6 million, and $91.1$59.6 million in fiscal 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, respectively.


3



EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT AS OF JULY 17, 201520, 2018
Name Title & Capacity Age 
Year First
Appointed an
Executive
Officer
Sean M. Connolly President and Chief Executive Officer 49
 2015
John F. Gehring Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer 54
 2004
Colleen R. Batcheler Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary 41
 2008
Albert D. Bolles Executive Vice President, Chief Technical and Operations Officer 57
 2014
Thomas M. McGough President, Consumer Foods 50
 2013
Scott E. Messel Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Corporate Secretary 56
 2001
Andrew G. Ross Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer 47
 2011
Nicole B. Theophilus Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer 45
 2013
Thomas P. Werner President, Commercial Foods 49
 2015
Robert G. Wise Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller 47
 2012
Name Title & Capacity Age 
Year First
Appointed an
Executive
Officer
Sean M. Connolly President and Chief Executive Officer 52
 2015
David S. Marberger Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 53
 2016
Colleen R. Batcheler Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary 44
 2008
David B. Biegger Executive Vice President, Chief Supply Chain Officer 59
 2015
Charisse Brock Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer 56
 2015
Thomas M. McGough President, Operating Segments 53
 2013
Darren C. Serrao Executive Vice President, Chief Growth Officer 52
 2015
Robert G. Wise Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller 50
 2012
Sean M. Connolly has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of ourthe Board since April 6, 2015. Previously,Prior to that, he wasserved as President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of The Hillshire Brands Company (brand name(a branded food products company) from June 2012 to August 2014;2014, Executive Vice President of Sara Lee Corporation (the former name ofpredecessor to Hillshire), and Chief Executive Officer, Sara Lee North American Retail and Foodservice, from January 2012 to June 2012. Prior to joining Hillshire, Mr. Connolly served as President of Campbell North America, the largest division of Campbell Soup Company (branded(a branded convenience food products)products company), from October 2010 to December 2011;2011, President, Campbell USA from 2008 to 2010;2010, and President, North American Foodservice for Campbell from 2007 to 2008. Before joining Campbell in 2002, he served in various marketing and brand management roles at The Procter & Gamble (brandedCompany (a consumer product goods)goods company).
John F. GehringDavid S. Marberger has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 2009.August 2016. Prior to joining Conagra Brands, he served as Chief Financial Officer of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. (a provider of over-the-counter healthcare products) from October 2015 until July 2016. Prior to that, Mr. Gehring joined ConAgra FoodsMarberger served as Vice President of Internal Audit in 2002, becamethe Senior Vice President in 2003, and most recentlyChief Financial Officer of Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. (a global manufacturer and supplier of premium chocolates) from 2008 until October 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Marberger served Tasty Baking Company as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2006 to 2008 and as Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller from July 2004 to January 2009. He served as ConAgra Foods' interim Chief Financial Officer from October 20062003 to November 2006. Prior to joining ConAgra Foods, Mr. Gehring was a partnerFrom 1993 until 2003, he served in various roles at Ernst & Young LLP (an accounting firm) from 1997 to 2001.Campbell Soup Company, where he last held the position of Vice President, Finance, Food and Beverage Division.
Colleen R. Batcheler has served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since September 2009 and served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from February 2008 until September 2009. Ms. Batcheler joined ConAgra FoodsConagra Brands in June 2006 as Vice President, Chief Securities Counsel and Assistant Corporate Secretary. In September 2006, she was named Corporate Secretary. From 2003 until joining ConAgra Foods,Conagra Brands, Ms. Batcheler was


served as Vice President and Corporate Secretary of Albertson's, Inc. (a retail food and drug chain). Previously,Prior to that, she wasserved as Associate Counsel with The Cleveland Clinic Foundation (a non-profit academic medical center) and an associate with Jones Day (a law firm).
Albert D. Bolles, Ph.D., was named Executive Vice President, Chief Technical and Operations Officer in May 2014. Dr. Bolles joined ConAgra Foods in 2006David B. Biegger has served as Executive Vice President Research, Quality & Innovation.and Chief Supply Chain Officer since October 2015. Prior to joining ConAgra Foods,Conagra Brands, Mr. Biegger spent nearly 11 years at the Campbell Soup Company, where he led Worldwide Research and Development for PepsiCo Beverages and Foods. From 1993 to 2002, he wasserved as Senior Vice President, Global TechnologySupply Chain from February 2014 until October 2015 and Qualitywas responsible for Tropicana Products Incorporatedthe global supply chain of that company, including manufacturing, quality, safety, engineering, procurement, logistics, environmental sustainability and customer service. Prior to joining Campbell Soup Company, he spent 24 years in supply chain roles at Procter & Gamble Co. (a beverage company)consumer goods corporation). Dr. Bolles
Charisse Brock has served as a memberExecutive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer since November 2015 and as Senior Vice President and Interim Chief Human Resources Officer from August 2015 until November 2015. Prior to serving in these roles, Ms. Brock served as Vice President of Human Resources for the BoardConsumer Foods segment of DirectorsConagra Brands from September 2010 until August 2015. Ms. Brock joined Conagra Brands in 2004 as Director of Landec Corporation (food products technologies and biomedical materials manufacturer) since May 2014.Human Resources, supporting the Refrigerated Foods Group. Prior to joining Conagra Brands, she served for 15 years at The Quaker Oats Company (which was acquired by PepsiCo during her tenure) in its Consumer Foods Division.
Thomas M. McGough has served as President, Operating Segments since May 2017 and as President of the Consumer Foods segment sincefrom May 2013.2013 until May 2017. Mr. McGough joined ConAgra FoodsConagra Brands in 2007 as Vice President in the Consumer Foods organization and has provided leadership for many brand teams within ConAgra Foods,Conagra Brands, including Banquet®, Hunt's®, and Reddi-wip®. He most recently served as President, Grocery Products sincefrom 2011 until May 2013, leading the largest business within the Consumer Foods segment. Mr. McGough has over twenty years25 of experience in the branded packaged foods industry beginningand began his career at H.J. Heinz in 1990.
Scott E. Messel has served as Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Corporate Secretary since July 2004. Mr. Messel joined ConAgra Foods in August 2001 as Vice President and Treasurer. Prior to joining ConAgra Foods, Mr. Messel served in various treasury leadership roles at Lennox International (a provider of climate control solutions), Flowserve

4



Corporation (a manufacturer of flow management products and services), and Ralston Purina Company (a former manufacturer of cereals, packaged foods, pet food, and livestock feed).
Andrew G. Ross joined ConAgra Foods as Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer in November 2011. Prior to joining ConAgra Foods, he was a principal at McKinsey & Company, Inc. (consulting firm) from May 2002 until November 2011, where he led the firm's global consumer, retail, and marketing practices. Prior to that, he worked for William Grant & Sons, Ltd.
Nicole B. TheophilusDarren C. Serrao has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Human ResourcesGrowth Officer since May 2013. Ms. Theophilus joined ConAgra Foods as Vice President, Chief Employment Counsel in April 2006. In additionAugust 2015. As head of the Growth Center of Excellence, Mr. Serrao leads efforts to her legal duties, she assumedbring together insights, innovation, research and development, and marketing teams to improve connectivity and boost speed-to-market, ensuring that strong insights lead to relevant and timely products with the role of Vice President, Human Resources for Commercial Foods in 2008, and most recentlyright marketing support. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Serrao served as Senior Vice President, Human ResourcesChief Marketing and Commercial Officer at Campbell Soup Company from November 2009February 2015 until May 2013. Prior to joining ConAgra Foods, she was an attorney and partner with Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin LLP (a law firm).
Thomas P. Werner was named PresidentAugust 2015, during which period he led the company's U.S. consumer business (its largest line of Commercial Foods in May 2015.business). Prior to that, Mr. Wernerhe served as Senior Vice President of FinanceInnovation and Business Development for our Private Brands and Commercial Foods operating segmentsCampbell North America from June 2013 to April 2015, Senior Vice President of Finance for the Lamb Weston operations within our Commercial Foods segment from MayJuly 2011 until June 2013,February 2015. Mr. Serrao has also held several profit and Vice President of Supply Chain from December 2009 until May 2011. Mr. Werner originally joined ConAgra Foods in 1999loss and has been in finance roles of increasing responsibility throughoutmarketing positions during his career, across all three of ConAgra Foods' operating segments-Commercial Foods, Consumer Foodsincluding roles with PepsiCo and Private Brands.Unilever.
Robert G. Wise has served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller since December 2012. Mr. Wise joined ConAgra FoodsConagra Brands in March 2003 and has held various positions of increasing responsibility with ConAgra Foods,Conagra Brands, including Vice President, Assistant Corporate Controller from March 2006 until January 2012 and most recently served as Vice President, Corporate Controller from January 2012 until December 2012. Prior to joining ConAgra Foods,Conagra Brands, Mr. Wise served in various roles at KPMG LLP (an accounting firm) from October 1995 tountil March 2003.
OTHER SENIOR OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT AS OF JULY 17, 2015
NameTitle & CapacityAge  
Joan K. ChowExecutive Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer54
Randy D. HarveyVice President, Internal Audit53
Derek De La MaterExecutive Vice President and President, Sales48
Joan K. Chow joined ConAgra Foods in February 2007 as Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer. Prior to joining ConAgra Foods, she served Sears Holding Corporation (retailing) as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer, Sears Retail from July 2005 until January 2007, and as Vice President, Marketing Services from April 2005 until July 2005. From 2002 until April 2005, Ms. Chow served Sears, Roebuck and Co. as Vice President, Home Services Marketing.
Randy Harvey joined ConAgra Foods in 2005. He was named to his current position in March 2015. He previously served the Company as Vice President, Corporate Tax from 2005 to 2015.
Derek De La Mater joined ConAgra Foods in 1993 and has held various leadership roles in sales and business development within the Company. He was named to his current position in March 2014. He previously served the Company as President, Customer Development, from 2013 to 2014, Senior Vice President, Sales, from 2011 to 2013, and Vice President, Sales from 2006 to 2011.

Foreign Operations
Foreign operations information is set forth in Note 21 "Business Segments and Related Information”Information" to the consolidated financial statements.


5



Available Information
We make available, free of charge through the “Investors—"Investors—Financial Reports & Filings”Filings" link on our Internet website at http://www.conagrafoods.com,www.conagrabrands.com, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.Commission ("SEC"). We use our Internet website, through the “Investors”"Investors" link, as a channel for routine distribution of important information, including news releases, analyst presentations, and financial information. The information on our website is not, and will not be deemed to be, a part of this annual report on Form 10-K or incorporated into any of our other filings with the SEC.


We have also posted on our website our (1) Corporate Governance Principles, (2) Code of Conduct, (3) Code of Ethics for Senior Corporate Officers, and (4) Charters for the Audit/Finance Committee, Nominating, Governance and Public Affairs Committee, and Human Resources Committee. Shareholders may also obtain copies of these items at no charge by writing to: Corporate Secretary, ConAgra Foods,Conagra Brands, Inc., One ConAgra Drive, Omaha, NE, 68102-5001.222 Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1300, Chicago, IL, 60654.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Our business is subject to various risks and uncertainties. Any of the risks and uncertainties described below could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations and should be considered in evaluating us. While we believe we have identified and discussed below the key risk factors affecting our business, there may be additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known or that are not currently believed to be significant that may adversely affect our business, performance, or financial condition in the future.
Risks Relating to our Business
Deterioration of general economic conditions could harm our business and results of operations.
Our business and results of operations may be adversely affected by changes in national or global economic conditions, including inflation, interest rates, availability of capital markets, consumer spending rates, energy availability and costs (including fuel surcharges), and the effects of governmental initiatives to manage economic conditions.
Volatility in financial markets and deterioration of national and global economic conditions could impact our business and operations in a variety of ways, including as follows:
consumers may shift purchases to more generic, lower-priced, or other value offerings, or may forego certain purchases altogether during economic downturns, which could result in a reduction in sales of higher margin products or a shift in our product mix to lower margin offerings adversely affecting the results of our Consumer Foods or Private Brands operations;
decreased demand in the restaurant business, particularly casual and fine dining, which may adversely affect our Commercial FoodsFoodservice operations;
volatility in commodity and other input costs could substantially impact our result of operations;
volatility in the equity markets or interest rates could substantially impact our pension costs and required pension contributions; and
it may become more costly or difficult to obtain debt or equity financing to fund operations or investment opportunities, or to refinance our debt in the future, in each case on terms and within a time period acceptable to us.
If we are unable to complete proposed divestitures, including the proposed divestiture of our Private Brands operations in a timely manner or at all, our financial results could be materially and adversely affected.
On June30, 2015, we announced our intent to divest our Private Brands operations. A divestiture of our Private Brands operations may not occur in a timely manner or at all, and any disposition will be subject to a number of factors, including the satisfaction of pre-closing conditions, as well as necessary regulatory and governmental approvals on acceptable terms. In addition, from time to time, we may divest other businesses that do not meet our strategic objectives or do not meet our growth or profitability targets. We may not be able to complete desired or proposed divestitures on terms favorable to us. Gains or losses on the sales of, or lost operating income from, those businesses may affect our profitability. Moreover, we may incur asset impairment charges related to divestitures that reduce our profitability.

6



Our divestiture activities may present financial, managerial, and operational risks. Those risks include diversion of management attention from existing businesses, difficulties separating personnel and financial and other systems, adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers and indemnities and potential disputes with the buyers. Any of these factors could adversely effect our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our existing and future debt may limit cash flow available to invest in the ongoing needs of our business and could prevent us from fulfilling our debt obligations.
As of May 31, 2015, we had a substantial amount of debt, including $4.24 billion of senior notes that we issued, or in connection with the acquisition of Ralcorp. We have the ability under our existing revolving credit facility to incur substantial additional debt. Our level of debt could have important consequences. For example, it could:
make it more difficult for us to make payments on our debt;
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of debt service, reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and other general corporate purposes;
increase our vulnerability to adverse economic or industry conditions;
limit our ability to obtain additional financing in the future to enable us to react to changes in our business; or
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to businesses in our industry that have less debt.
Additionally, any failure to meet required payments on our debt, or failure to comply with any covenants in the instruments governing our debt, could result in an event of default under the terms of those instruments and a downgrade to our credit ratings. A downgrade in our credit ratings would increase our borrowing costs and could affect our ability to issue commercial paper. In the event of a default, the holders of our debt could elect to declare all the amounts outstanding under such instruments to be due and payable. Any default under the agreements governing our debt and the remedies sought by the holders of such debt could render us unable to pay principal and interest on our debt.
We may not realize the benefits that we expect from our Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan, or SCAE Plan.
During fiscal 2014, we announced our Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan, or SCAE Plan, which was an expansion of the scope of the plan to integrate Ralcorp. The SCAE Plan includes steps to optimize the entire organization’s supply chain network and to improve selling, general and administrative effectiveness and efficiencies, as well as our continuing evaluation of plans for the integration of Ralcorp and related restructuring activities. As discussed above, on June 30, 2015, we announced our intent to divest our Private Brands operations. A divestiture of our Private Brands operations may not occur in a timely manner or at all, and we will continue to implement the work related to optimizing our supply chain network and pursue cost reductions through our selling, general and administrative functions and productivity improvemnts. The successful design and implementation of the SCAE Plan presents significant organizational design and infrastructure challenges and in many cases will require successful negotiations with third parties, including labor organizations, suppliers, business partners, and other stakeholders. In addition, the SCAE Plan may not advance our business strategy as expected. Events and circumstances, such as financial or strategic difficulties, delays and unexpected costs may occur that could result in our not realizing all or any of the anticipated benefits or our not realizing the anticipated benefits on our expected timetable. If we are unable to realize the anticipated savings of the SCAE Plan, our ability to fund other initiatives may be adversely affected. Any failure to implement the SCAE Plan in accordance with our expectations could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, the complexity of the SCAE Plan will require a substantial amount of management and operational resources. Our management team must successfully implement administrative and operational changes necessary to achieve the anticipated benefits of the SCAE Plan. These and related demands on our resources may divert the organization’s attention from existing core businesses, integrating financial or other systems, have adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers, and impact employee morale. As a result, our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows may be adversely affected.

7



Increases in commodity costs may have a negative impact on profits.
We use many different commodities such as wheat, corn, oats, soybeans, beef, pork, poultry, and energy. Commodities are subject to price volatility caused by commodity market fluctuations, supply and demand, currency fluctuations, external conditions such as weather, and changes in governmental agricultural and energy policies and regulations. Commodity price increases will result in increases in raw material, packaging, and energy costs and operating costs. We may not be able to increase our product prices and achieve cost savings that fully offset these increased costs; and increasing prices may result in reduced sales volume, reduced margins, and profitability. We have experience in hedging against commodity price increases; however, these practices and experience reduce, but do not eliminate, the risk of negative profit impacts from commodity price increases. We do not fully hedge against changes in commodity prices, and the risk management procedures that we use may not always work as we intend.
Volatility in the market value of derivatives we use to manage exposures to fluctuations in commodity prices will cause volatility in our gross margins and net earnings.
We utilize derivatives to manage price risk for some of our principal ingredients and energy costs, including grains (wheat, corn, and oats), oils, beef, pork, poultry, and energy. Changes in the values of these derivatives are generally recorded in earnings currently, resulting in volatility in both gross margin and net earnings. These gains and losses are reported in cost of sales in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and in unallocated corporate items in our segment operating results until we utilize the underlying input in our manufacturing process, at which time the gains and losses are reclassified to segment operating profit. We may experience volatile earnings as a result of these accounting treatments.
Increased competition may result in reduced sales or profits.
The food industry is highly competitive, and further consolidation in the industry would likely increase competition. Our principal competitors have substantial financial, marketing, and other resources. Increased competition can reduce our sales due to loss of market share or the need to reduce prices to respond to competitive and customer pressures. Competitive pressures also may restrict our ability to increase prices, including in response to commodity and other cost increases. We sell branded, private brand, and customized food products, as well as commercially branded foods and ingredients.foods. Our branded products have an advantage over private brand products primarily due to advertising and name recognition, although private brand products typically sell at a discount to those of branded competitors. In addition, when branded competitors focus on price and promotion, the environment for private brand producers becomes more challenging because the price difference between private brand products and branded products may become less significant. In most product categories, we compete not only with other widely advertised branded products, but also with other private label and store brand products that are generally sold at lower prices. A strong competitive response from one or more of our competitors to our marketplace efforts, or a consumer shift towards more generic, lower-priced, or other value offerings, could result in us reducing pricing, increasing marketing or other expenditures, or losing market share. Our margins and profits could decrease if a reduction in prices or increased costs are not counterbalanced with increased sales volume.
Significant private brand competitive activity can lead to volatility

Increases in results and margin compression.
Private brand customer buying decisions are often based on a periodic bidding process. Our sales volumecommodity costs may decrease significantly if our offer is too high and we lose the ability to sell private brand products through these channels, even temporarily. Alternatively, we risk reducing our margins if our offer is successful but below our desired price. Either of these outcomes may adversely affect our results of operations.
Changes in our relationships with significant customers or suppliers could adversely affect us.
During fiscal 2015, our largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates, accounted for approximately 18% of our net revenues. There can be no assurance that Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and other significant customers will continue to purchase our products in the same quantities or on the same terms as in the past, particularly as increasingly powerful retailers continue to demand lower pricing. The loss of a significant customer or a material reduction in sales to a significant customer could materially and adversely affect our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations.
Disruption of our supply chain could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our ability to make, move, and sell our products is critical to our success. Damage or disruption to our supply chain, including third-party manufacturing or transportation and distribution capabilities, due to weather, including any potential

8



effects of climate change, natural disaster, fire or explosion, terrorism, pandemics, strikes, government action, or other reasons beyond our control or the control of our suppliers and business partners, could impair our ability to manufacture or sell our products. Failure to take adequate steps to mitigate the likelihood or potential impact of such events, or to effectively manage such events if they occur, particularly when a product is sourced from a single supplier or location, could adversely affect our business or financial results. In addition, disputes with significant suppliers, including disputes regarding pricing or performance, could adversely affect our ability to supply products to our customers and could materially and adversely affect our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations.
The sophistication and buying power of our customers could have a negative impact on profits.
Our customers,We use many different commodities such as supermarkets, warehouse clubs,wheat, corn, oats, soybeans, beef, pork, poultry, steel,aluminum, and food distributors,energy. Commodities are subject to price volatility caused by commodity market fluctuations, supply and demand, currency fluctuations, external conditions such as weather, and changes in governmental agricultural and energy policies and regulations. In addition, recent world events have continuedincreased the risks posed by international trade disputes, tariffs, and sanctions. We procure a wide spectrum of commodities globally and could potentially face increased prices for commodities sourced from nations that could be impacted by trade disputes, tariffs, or sanctions. Commodity price increases will result in increases in raw material, packaging, and energy costs and operating costs. We may not be able to consolidate,increase our product prices and achieve cost savings that fully offset these increased costs; and increasing prices may result in reduced sales volume, reduced margins, and profitability. We have experience in hedging against commodity price increases; however, these practices and experience reduce, but do not eliminate, the risk of negative profit impacts from commodity price increases. We do not fully hedge against changes in commodity prices, and the risk management procedures that we use may not always work as we intend.
Volatility in the market value of derivatives we use to manage exposures to fluctuations in commodity prices will cause volatility in our gross margins and net earnings.
We utilize derivatives to manage price risk for some of our principal ingredients and energy costs, including grains (wheat, corn, and oats), oils, beef, pork, poultry, and energy. Changes in the values of these derivatives are generally recorded in earnings currently, resulting in fewer customers onvolatility in both gross margin and net earnings. These gains and losses are reported in cost of goods sold in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and in unallocated general corporate expenses in our segment operating results until we utilize the underlying input in our manufacturing process, at which we can rely for business. These consolidationstime the gains and the growth of supercenters have produced large, sophisticated customers with increased buying power and negotiating strength wholosses are more capable of resisting price increases and can demand lower pricing, increased promotional programs, or specialty tailored products. In addition, larger retailers have the scalereclassified to develop supply chains that permit them to operate with reduced inventories or to develop and market their own retailer brands. These customerssegment operating profit. We may also in the future use more of their shelf space, currently used for our products, for their store brand products. We continue to implement initiatives to counteract these pressures. However, if the larger sizeexperience volatile earnings as a result of these customers results in additional negotiating strength and/or increased private label or store brand competition, our profitability could decline.
Consolidation also increases the risk that adverse changes in our customers' business operations or financial performance will have a corresponding material adverse effect on us. For example, if our customers cannot access sufficient funds or financing, then they may delay, decrease, or cancel purchases of our products, or delay or fail to pay us for previous purchases.
We must identify changing consumer preferences and develop and offer food products to meet their preferences.
Consumer preferences evolve over time and the success of our food products depends on our ability to identify the tastes and dietary habits of consumers and to offer products that appeal to their preferences, including concerns of consumers regarding health and wellness, obesity, product attributes, and ingredients. Introduction of new products and product extensions requires significant development and marketing investment. If our products fail to meet consumer preferences, or we fail to introduce new and improved products on a timely basis, then the return on that investment will be less than anticipated and our strategy to grow sales and profits with investments in acquisitions, marketing, and innovation will be less successful. Similarly, demand for our products could be affected by consumer concerns or perceptions regarding the health effects of ingredients such as sodium, trans fats, sugar, processed wheat, or other product ingredients or attributes.accounting treatments.
If we do not achieve the appropriate cost structure in the highly competitive food industry, our profitability could decrease.
Our future success and earnings growth depend in part on our ability to achieve the appropriate cost structure and operate efficiently in the highly competitive food industry, particularly in an environment of volatile input costs. We continue to implement profit-enhancing initiatives that impact our supply chain and general and administrative functions. These initiatives are focused on cost-saving opportunities in procurement, manufacturing, logistics, and customer service, as well as general and administrative overhead levels. Gaining additional efficiencies may become more difficult over time. Our failure to reduce costs through productivity gains or by eliminating redundant costs resulting from acquisitions could adversely affect our profitability and weaken our competitive position. If we do not continue to effectively manage costs and achieve additional efficiencies, our competitiveness and our profitability could decrease.
We may not realize the benefits that we expect from our Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan, or SCAE Plan.
In May 2013, we announced the Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan (the "SCAE Plan"), our plan to integrate and restructure the operations of our Private Brands business, improve selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") effectiveness and efficiencies, and optimize our supply chain network, manufacturing assets, dry distribution centers, and mixing centers. In fiscal 2016, we announced plans to realize efficiency benefits by reducing SG&A expenses and enhancing trade spend processes and tools, which plans were included in the SCAE Plan. Although we divested the Private Brands business, we have continued to implement the SCAE Plan, including by working to optimize our supply chain network, pursue cost reductions through our SG&A functions, enhance trade spend processes and tools, and improve productivity.
The successful design and implementation of the SCAE Plan presents significant organizational design and infrastructure challenges and in many cases will require successful negotiations with third parties, including labor organizations, suppliers, business partners, and other stakeholders. In addition, the SCAE Plan may not advance our business strategy as expected. Events and circumstances, such as financial or strategic difficulties, delays, and unexpected costs may occur that could result in our not realizing all or any of the anticipated benefits or our not realizing the anticipated benefits on our expected timetable. If we are unable to realize the anticipated savings of the SCAE Plan, our ability to fund other initiatives may be adversely affected. Any failure to implement the SCAE Plan in accordance with our expectations could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.


In addition, the complexity of the SCAE Plan will require a substantial amount of management and operational resources. Our management team must successfully implement administrative and operational changes necessary to achieve the anticipated benefits of the SCAE Plan. These and related demands on our resources may divert the organization's attention from existing core businesses, integrating financial or other systems, have adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers, and impact employee morale. As a result, our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be adversely affected.
We may be subject to product liability claims and product recalls, which could negatively impact our profitability.
We sell food products for human consumption, which involves risks such as product contamination or spoilage, product tampering, other adulteration of food products, mislabeling, and misbranding. We may be subject to liability if the consumption of any of our products causes injury, illness, or death. In addition, we will voluntarily recall products in the event of contamination or damage. We have issued recalls and have from time to time been and currently are involved in lawsuits relating to our food products. A significant product liability judgment or a widespread product recall may negatively impact our sales and profitability for a period of time depending on the costs of the recall, the destruction of product inventory, product availability, competitive reaction, customer reaction, and consumer attitudes. Even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our products caused illness or injury could adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and our corporate and brand image.

9



Additionally, as a manufacturer and marketer of food products, we are subject to extensive regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and other national,federal, state, and local government agencies. The Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act, or the FDCA,(the "FDCA"), and the Food Safety Modernization Act and their respective regulations govern, among other things, the manufacturing, composition and ingredients, packaging, and safety of food products. Some aspects of these laws use a strict liability standard for imposing sanctions on corporate behavior; meaning that no intent is required to be established. If we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we may be subject to civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, recalls, or seizures, as well as criminal sanctions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. As previously disclosed, among
We must identify changing consumer preferences and develop and offer food products to meet their preferences.
Consumer preferences evolve over time and the matters outstanding duringsuccess of our food products depends on our ability to identify the tastes and dietary habits of consumers and to offer products that appeal to their preferences, including concerns of consumers regarding health and wellness, obesity, product attributes, and ingredients. Introduction of new products and product extensions requires significant development and marketing investment. If our products fail to meet consumer preferences, or we fail to introduce new and improved products on a timely basis, then the return on that investment will be less than anticipated and our strategy to grow sales and profits with investments in acquisitions, marketing, and innovation will be less successful. Similarly, demand for our products could be affected by consumer concerns or perceptions regarding the health effects of ingredients such as sodium, trans fats, sugar, processed wheat, or other product ingredients or attributes.
Changes in our relationships with significant customers or suppliers could adversely affect us.
During fiscal 20152018, our largest customer, Walmart, Inc. and its affiliates, accounted for approximately 24% of our consolidated net sales. There can be no assurance that Walmart, Inc. and other significant customers will continue to purchase our products in the same quantities or on the same terms as in the past, particularly as increasingly powerful retailers continue to demand lower pricing. The loss of a significant customer or a material reduction in sales to a significant customer could materially and adversely affect our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations.


The sophistication and buying power of our customers could have a negative impact on profits.
Our customers, such as supermarkets, warehouse clubs, and food distributors, have continued to consolidate, resulting in fewer customers on which we can rely for business. These consolidations, the growth of supercenters, and the growth of on-line customers have produced large, sophisticated customers with increased buying power and negotiating strength who are more capable of resisting price increases and can demand lower pricing, increased promotional programs, or specialty tailored products. In addition, larger retailers have the scale to develop supply chains that permit them to operate with reduced inventories or to develop and market their own retailer brands. These customers may also in the future use more of their shelf space, currently used for our products, for their store brand products. We continue to implement initiatives to counteract these pressures. However, if the larger size of these customers results in additional negotiating strength and/or increased private label or store brand competition, our profitability could decline.
Consolidation also increases the risk that adverse changes in our customers' business operations or financial performance will have a corresponding material adverse effect on us. For example, if our customers cannot access sufficient funds or financing, then they may delay, decrease, or cancel purchases of our products, or delay or fail to pay us for previous purchases.
If we are unable to complete proposed acquisitions or integrate acquired businesses, our financial results could be materially and adversely affected.
From time to time, we evaluate acquisition candidates that may strategically fit our business objectives. If we are unable to complete acquisitions or to successfully integrate and develop acquired businesses, our financial results could be materially and adversely affected. Moreover, we may incur asset impairment charges related to acquisitions that reduce our profitability.
Our acquisition activities may present financial, managerial, and operational risks. Those risks include diversion of management attention from existing businesses, difficulties integrating personnel and financial and other systems, effective and immediate implementation of control environment processes across our employee population, adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers, inaccurate estimates of fair value made in the Company's 2007 peanut butter recall, was an investigation byaccounting for acquisitions and amortization of acquired intangible assets which would reduce future reported earnings, potential loss of customers or key employees of acquired businesses, and indemnities and potential disputes with the U.S. Attorney's officesellers. Any of these factors could affect our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations.
In fiscal 2018, we completed the acquisitions of the Sandwich Bros. of Wisconsin® business for $87.3 million in Georgiacash, net of cash acquired, including working capital adjustments, and the Consumer Protection BranchAngie's Artisan Treats, LLC business, which included the Angie's® BOOMCHICKAPOP® ready-to-eat popcorn brand, for $249.8 million in cash, net of the Department of Justice. We cooperated with the U.S. Attorney’s office and the Department of Justice in regard to the investigation and in May 2015, our subsidiary, ConAgra Grocery Products,cash acquired, including working capital adjustments. In fiscal 2019, we entered into an executed pleaa definitive merger agreement with the government,Pinnacle pursuant to which, it agreed to plead guilty to a single misdemeanor under the Food, Drug & Cosmetics Act. The plea agreement isamong other things and subject to the approvalsatisfaction or waiver of specified conditions, we plan to acquire all of the U.S. District Courtoutstanding shares of common stock of Pinnacle for cash and shares of Conagra Brands common stock. See "Risks Relating to our Planned Acquisition of Pinnacle" below for more information on risks relating to the Middle Districtplanned acquisition of Georgia.Pinnacle.
If we are unable to complete our proposed divestitures, our financial results could be materially and adversely affected.
From time to time, we may divest businesses that do not meet our strategic objectives or do not meet our growth or profitability targets. We may not be able to complete desired or proposed divestitures on terms favorable to us. Gains or losses on the sales of, or lost operating income from, those businesses may affect our profitability and margins. Moreover, we may incur asset impairment charges related to divestitures that reduce our profitability.
Our divestiture activities may present financial, managerial, and operational risks. Those risks include diversion of management attention from existing businesses, difficulties separating personnel and financial and other systems, possible need for providing transition services to buyers, adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers and indemnities and potential disputes with the buyers. Any of these factors could adversely affect our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations.


Disruption of our supply chain could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our ability to make, move, and sell our products is critical to our success. Damage or disruption to our supply chain, including third-party manufacturing or transportation and distribution capabilities, due to weather, including any potential effects of climate change, natural disaster, fire or explosion, terrorism, pandemics, strikes, government action, or other reasons beyond our control or the control of our suppliers and business partners, could impair our ability to manufacture or sell our products. Failure to take adequate steps to mitigate the likelihood or potential impact of such events, or to effectively manage such events if they occur, particularly when a product is sourced from a single supplier or location, could adversely affect our business or financial results. In addition, disputes with significant suppliers, including disputes regarding pricing or performance, could adversely affect our ability to supply products to our customers and could materially and adversely affect our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations.
Any damage to our reputation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Maintaining a good reputation globally is critical to selling our products. Product contamination or tampering, the failure to maintain high standards for product quality, safety, and integrity, including with respect to raw materials and ingredients obtained from suppliers, or allegations of product quality issues, mislabeling, or contamination, even if untrue, may reduce demand for our products or cause production and delivery disruptions. Our reputation could also be adversely impacted by any of the following, or by adverse publicity (whether or not valid) relating thereto: the failure to maintain high ethical, social, and environmental standards for all of our operations and activities; the failure to achieve ourany stated goals with respect to sodium or saturated fat;the nutritional profile of our products; our research and development efforts; or our environmental impact, including use of agricultural materials, packaging, energy use, and waste management. Moreover, the growing use of social and digital media by consumers has greatly increased the speed and extent that information or misinformation and opinions can be shared. Failure to comply with local laws and regulations, to maintain an effective system of internal controls or to provide accurate and timely financial information could also hurt our reputation. Damage to our reputation or loss of consumer confidence in our products for any of these or other reasons could result in decreased demand for our products and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations, as well as require additional resources to rebuild our reputation.
Our results could be adversely impacted as a result of increased pension, labor, and people-related expenses.
Inflationary pressures and any shortages in the labor market could increase labor costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results or financial condition. Our labor costs include the cost of providing employee benefits in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, including pension, health and welfare, and severance benefits. Changes in interest rates, mortality rates, health care costs, early retirement rates, investment returns, and the market value of plan assets can affect the funded status of our defined benefit plans and cause volatility in the future funding requirements of the plans. A significant increase in our obligations or future funding requirements could have a negative impact on our results of operations and cash flows from operations. Additionally, the annual costs of benefits vary with increased costs of health care and the outcome of collectively-bargained wage and benefit agreements.
If we fail to comply with the many laws applicable to our business, we may face lawsuits or incur significant fines and penalties.
Our business is subject to a variety of governmental laws and regulations, including food and drug laws, environmental laws, laws related to advertising and marketing practices, accounting standards, taxation requirements, competition laws, employment laws, data privacy laws, and anti-corruption laws, among others, in and outside of the United States. Our facilities and products are subject to many laws and regulations administered by the United States Department of Agriculture, the Federal Food and Drug Administration, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and other federal, state, local, and foreign governmental agencies relating to the processing, packaging, storage, distribution, advertising, labeling, quality, and safety of food products, the health and safety of our employees, and the protection of the environment. Our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could subject us to lawsuits, administrative penalties, and civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, and recalls of our products. Our operations are also subject to extensive and increasingly stringent regulations administered by the Environmental Protection Agency, which pertain to the discharge of materials into the environment and the handling and disposition of wastes. Failure to comply with these regulations can have serious consequences, including civil and administrative penalties and negative publicity. Changes in applicable laws or regulations or evolving interpretations thereof, including increased government regulations to limit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions as a result of concern over climate change, may result in increased compliance costs, capital expenditures, and other financial obligations for us, which could affect our profitability or impede the production or distribution of our products, which could affect our net operating revenues.

10



We are increasingly dependent on information technology, and potential disruption, cyber attacks, security problems, and expanding social media vehicles present new risks.
We rely on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to process, transmit, and store electronic and financial information, to manage and support a variety of business processes and activities, and to comply with regulatory, legal, and tax requirements. Our information technology systems, some of which are dependent on services provided by third parties, may be vulnerable to damage, interruption, or shutdown due to any number of causes outside of our control such as catastrophic events, natural disasters, fires, power outages, systems failures, telecommunications failures, security breaches, computer viruses, hackers, employee error or malfeasance, and other causes. Increased cybersecurity threats pose a potential risk to the security and viability of our information technology systems, as well as the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the data stored on those systems. If we do not allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build and sustain the proper technology infrastructure and to maintain and protect the related automated and manual control processes, we could be subject to billing and collection errors, business disruptions, or damage resulting from security breaches. If any of our significant information technology systems suffer severe damage, disruption, or shutdown, and our business continuity plans do not effectively resolve the issues in a timely manner, our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected, and we could experience delays in reporting our financial results. In addition, there is a risk of business interruption, violation of data privacy laws and regulations, litigation, and reputational damage from leakage of confidential information. Any interruption of our information technology systems could have operational, reputational, legal, and financial impacts that may have a material adverse effect on our business.
In addition, the inappropriate use of certain media vehicles could cause brand damage or information leakage. Negative posts or comments about the Company on any social networking web site could seriously damage its reputation. In addition, the disclosure of non-public company sensitive information through external media channels could lead to information loss. Identifying new points of entry as social media continues to expand presents new challenges. Any business interruptions or damage to our reputation could negatively impact our financial condition, results of operations, and the market price of our common stock.
Additionally, we regularly move data across national borders to conduct our operations and, consequently, are subject to a variety of laws and regulations in the United States and other jurisdictions regarding privacy, data protection, and data security, including those related to the collection, storage, handling, use, disclosure, transfer, and security of personal data. There is significant uncertainty with respect to compliance with such privacy and data protection laws and regulations, including the European Union General Data Protection Regulation, because they are continuously evolving and developing and may be interpreted and applied differently from country to country and may create inconsistent or conflicting requirements.
We rely on our management team and other key personnel.
We depend on the skills, working relationships, and continued services of key personnel, including our experienced management team. In addition, our ability to achieve our operating goals depends on our ability to identify, hire, train, and retain qualified individuals. We compete with other companies both within and outside of our industry for talented personnel, and we may lose key personnel or fail to attract, train, and retain other talented personnel. Any such loss or failure could adversely affect our product sales, financial condition, and operating results.
In particular, our continued success will depend in part on our ability to retain the talents and dedication of key employees. If key employees terminate their employment, or if an insufficient number of employees is retained to maintain effective operations, our business activities may be adversely affected and our management team's attention may be diverted. In addition, we may not be able to locate suitable replacements for any key employees who leave, or offer employment to potential replacements on reasonable terms, all of which could adversely affect our product sales, financial condition, and operating results.
Our existing and future debt may limit cash flow available to invest in the ongoing needs of our business and could prevent us from fulfilling our debt obligations.
As of May 27, 2018, we had a substantial amount of debt, including approximately $2.9 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes. We have the ability under our existing revolving credit facility to incur substantial additional debt. Our level of debt could have important consequences. For example, it could:
make it more difficult for us to make payments on our debt;
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of debt service, reducing


the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and other general corporate purposes;
increase our vulnerability to adverse economic or industry conditions;
limit our ability to obtain additional financing in the future to enable us to react to changes in our business; or
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to businesses in our industry that have less debt.
Additionally, any failure to meet required payments on our debt, or failure to comply with any covenants in the instruments governing our debt, could result in an event of default under the terms of those instruments and a downgrade to our credit ratings. A downgrade in our credit ratings would increase our borrowing costs and could affect our ability to issue commercial paper. In the event of a default, the holders of our debt could elect to declare all the amounts outstanding under such instruments to be due and payable. Any default under the agreements governing our debt and the remedies sought by the holders of such debt could render us unable to pay principal and interest on our debt.
Impairment in the carrying value of goodwill or other intangibles could result in the incurrence of impairment charges and negatively impact our net worth.
As of May 27, 2018, we had goodwill of $4.5 billion and other intangibles of $1.3 billion. The net carrying value of goodwill represents the fair value of acquired businesses in excess of identifiable assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date (or subsequent impairment date, if applicable). The net carrying value of other intangibles represents the fair value of trademarks, customer relationships, and other acquired intangibles as of the acquisition date (or subsequent impairment date, if applicable), net of accumulated amortization. Goodwill and other acquired intangibles expected to contribute indefinitely to our cash flows are not amortized, but must be evaluated by management at least annually for impairment. Amortized intangible assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be recoverable. Impairments to goodwill and other intangible assets may be caused by factors outside our control, such as the inability to quickly replace lost co-manufacturing business, increasing competitive pricing pressures, lower than expected revenue and profit growth rates, changes in industry EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) multiples, changes in discount rates based on changes in cost of capital (interest rates, etc.), or the bankruptcy of a significant customer and could result in the incurrence of impairment charges andnegatively impact our net worth.
Our results could be adversely impacted as a result of increased pension, labor, and people-related expenses.
Inflationary pressures and any shortages in the labor market could increase labor costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results or financial condition. Our labor costs include the cost of providing employee benefits in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, including pension, health and welfare, and severance benefits. Changes in interest rates, mortality rates, health care costs, early retirement rates, investment returns, and the market value of plan assets can affect the funded status of our defined benefit plans and cause volatility in the future funding requirements of the plans. A significant increase in our obligations or future funding requirements could have a negative impact on our results of operations and cash flows from operations. Additionally, the annual costs of benefits vary with increased costs of health care and the outcome of collectively-bargained wage and benefit agreements.
Climate change, or legal, regulatory, or market measures to address climate change, may negatively affect our business and operations.
There is growing concern that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere may have an adverse impact on global temperatures, weather patterns, and the frequency and severity of extreme weather and natural disasters. In the event that such climate change has a negative effect on agricultural productivity, we may be subject to decreased availability or less favorable pricing for certain commodities that are necessary for our products, such as corn, wheat, and potatoes. We may also be subjected to decreased availability or less favorable pricing for water as a result of such change, which could impact our manufacturing and distribution operations. In addition, natural disasters and extreme weather conditions may disrupt the productivity of our facilities or the operation of our supply chain. The increasing concern over climate change also may result in more regional, federal, and/or global legal and regulatory requirements to reduce or mitigate the effects of greenhouse gases. In the event that such regulation is enacted and is more aggressive than the sustainability measures that we are currently undertaking to monitor our emissions and improve our energy efficiency, we may experience significant increases in our costs of operation and delivery. In particular, increasing regulation of fuel emissions could substantially increase the distribution and supply chain costs associated with our products. As a result, climate change could negatively affect our business and operations.
We are increasingly dependent on information technology, and potential disruption, cyber attacks, security problems, and expanding social media vehicles present new risks.
We are increasingly dependent on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to process, transmit, and store electronic and financial information, to manage and support a variety of business processes and activities, and to comply with regulatory, legal, and tax requirements. If we do not allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build and sustain the proper technology infrastructure and to maintain and protect the related automated and manual control processes, we could be subject to billing and collection errors, business disruptions, or damage resulting from security breaches. If any of our significant information technology systems suffer severe damage, disruption, or shutdown, and our business continuity plans do not effectively resolve the issues in a timely manner, our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected, and we could experience delays in reporting our financial results. In addition, there is a risk of business interruption, litigation risks, and reputational damage from leakage of confidential information.
The inappropriate use of certain media vehicles could cause brand damage or information leakage. Negative posts or comments about the Company on any social networking web site could seriously damage its reputation. In addition, the disclosure of non-public company sensitive information through external media channels could lead to information loss. Identifying new points of entry as social media continues to expand presents new challenges. Any business interruptions or damage to our reputation could negatively impact our financial condition, results of operations, and the market price of our common stock.
In connection with Ralcorp's separation of its Post brand cereals business, Post agreed to indemnify Ralcorp for certain liabilities. However, there can be no assurance that the indemnity will be sufficient to protect us against the full amount of such liabilities, or that Post's ability to satisfy its indemnification obligations will not be impaired in the future.
Pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement and the tax sharing agreement that Ralcorp entered into with Post in connection with the separation of Ralcorp's Post brand cereals business, Post agreed to indemnify Ralcorp for certain liabilities. Third parties may seek to hold us responsible for any of the liabilities that Post agreed to retain or assume, and there can be no assurance that the indemnification from Post will be sufficient to protect us against the full amount of such liabilities, or that Post will be able to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations. In addition, even if we ultimately succeed in recovering from Post any amounts for which we are held liable, we may be temporarily required to bear these losses ourselves.
Impairment in the carrying value of goodwill or other intangibles could result in the incurrence of impairment charges and negatively impact our net worth.
As of May 31, 2015, we had goodwill of $6.30 billion and other intangibles of $3.03 billion. The net carrying value of goodwill represents the fair value of acquired businesses in excess of identifiable assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date (or subsequent impairment date, if applicable). The net carrying value of other intangibles represents the fair value of trademarks, customer relationships, and other acquired intangibles as of the acquisition date (or subsequent impairment date, if applicable), net of accumulated amortization. Goodwill and other acquired intangibles expected to contribute indefinitely to our cash flows are not amortized, but must be evaluated by management at least annually for impairment. Amortized

11



intangible assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be recoverable. Impairments to goodwill and other intangible assets may be caused by factors outside our control, such as the inability to quickly replace lost co-manufacturing business, increasing competitive pricing pressures, lower than expected revenue and profit growth rates, changes in industry EBITDA multiples, changes in discount rates based on changes in cost of capital (interest rates, etc.), or the bankruptcy of a significant customer and could result in the incurrence of impairment charges andnegatively impact our net worth.
Following the impairment charges recorded in fiscal 2015, the carrying value of goodwill in our Private Brands reporting units included $269.3 million for Cereal, $588.2 million for Pasta, $276.5 million for Snacks, and $535.5 million for Retail Bakery. All of the goodwill for the Bars and Coordinated and Condiments reporting units was impaired as of the end of fiscal 2015. If the future performance of one or more of the reporting units within the Private Brands segment falls short of our expectations or if there are significant changes in risk-adjusted discount rates due to changes in market conditions, we could be required to recognize additional, material impairment charges in future periods.
The termination or expiration of current co-manufacturing arrangements could reduce our sales volume and adversely affect our results of operations.
Our businesses periodically enter into co-manufacturing arrangements with manufacturers of products. The terms of these agreements vary but are generally for relatively short periods of time. Volumes produced under each of these agreements can fluctuate significantly based upon the product's life cycle, product promotions, alternative production capacity, and other factors, none of which are under our direct control. Our future ability to enter into co-manufacturing arrangements is not guaranteed, and a decrease in current co-manufacturing levels could have a significant negative impact on sales volume.
Ardent Mills may not achieve the benefits that are anticipated from the joint venture.
The benefits that are expected to result from the recently formedour Ardent Mills joint venture will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated cost synergies in the transaction, Ardent Mills' ability to successfully integrate the ConAgra Mills and Horizon Milling businesses and its ability to successfully manage the joint venture on a going-forward basis. It is not certain that we will realize these benefits at all, and if we do, it is not certain how long it will take to achieve these benefits. If, for example, we are unable to achieve the anticipated cost savings, or if there are unforeseen integration costs, or if Ardent Mills is unable to operate the joint venture smoothly in the future, the financial performance of the joint venture may be negatively affected.
As we outsource certain functions, we become more dependent on the third parties performing those functions.
As part of a concerted effort to achieve cost savings and efficiencies, we have entered into agreements with third-party service providers under which we have outsourced certain information systems, sales, finance, accounting, and other functions, and we may enter into managed services agreements with respect to other functions in the future. If any of these third-party service providers do not perform according to the terms of the agreements, or if we fail to adequately monitor their performance, we may not be able to achieve the expected cost savings or we may have to incur additional costs to correct errors made by such service providers, and our reputation could be harmed. Depending on the function involved, such errors may also lead to business interruption, damage or disruption of information technology systems, processing inefficiencies, the loss of or damage to intellectual property or non-public company sensitive information through security breaches or otherwise, effects on financial reporting, litigation or remediation costs, or damage to our reputation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, if we transition functions to one or more new, or among existing, external service providers, we may experience challenges that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
Our intellectual property rights are valuable, and any inability to protect them could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our intellectual property rights, including our trademarks, licensing agreements, trade secrets, patents, and copyrights, are a significant and valuable aspect of our business. We attempt to protect our intellectual property rights by pursuing remedies available to us under trademark, copyright, trade secret, and patent laws, as well as entering into licensing, third-party nondisclosure and assignment agreements and policing of third-party misuses of our intellectual property. If we are unablefail to complete proposed acquisitionsadequately protect the intellectual property rights we have now or integrate acquired businesses,may acquire in the future, or if there occurs any change in law or otherwise that serves to reduce or remove the current legal protections of our intellectual property, then our financial results could be materially and adversely affected.
From timeCertain of our intellectual property rights, including the P.F. Chang's®, Bertolli®, Del Monte®, and Libby's® trademarks, are owned by third parties and licensed to time, we evaluate acquisition candidates that may strategically fit our business objectives.us, and others, such as Alexia®, are owned by us and licensed to third parties. While many of these licensing arrangements are perpetual in nature, others must be periodically renegotiated or renewed pursuant to the terms of such licensing arrangement. If in the future we are unable to complete acquisitionsrenew such a licensing arrangement pursuant to its terms and conditions, or if we fail to successfully integrate and develop acquired businesses,renegotiate such a licensing arrangement, then our financial results could be materially and adversely affected. Moreover,
There is also a risk that other parties may have intellectual property rights covering some of our brands, products, or technology. If any third parties bring a claim of intellectual property infringement against us, we may incur asset impairment charges relatedbe subject to acquisitions that reduce our profitability.
Our acquisition activities may present financial, managerial,costly and operational risks. Those risks include diversiontime-consuming litigation, diverting the attention of management attention from existing businesses, difficulties integrating personnel and financialour employees. If we are unsuccessful in defending against such claims, we may be subject to, among other things, significant damages, injunctions against development and other systems, effective and immediate implementationsale of control environment processes acrosscertain products, or we may be required to enter into costly licensing agreements, any of which could have an adverse impact on our employee population, adverse effects on existing business, relationships with suppliers and customers, inaccurate estimates of fair value made in the accounting for acquisitions and amortization of acquired intangible assets which would reduce future reported earnings, potential loss of customers or key employees of acquired businesses, and indemnities and potential disputes with the sellers. Any of these factors could affect our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations.
Actions

Risks Relating to our Spinoff of activistLamb Weston
We may be unable to achieve some or all of the benefits that we expect to achieve from the Spinoff.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company completed the announced Spinoff of Lamb Weston. Although we believe that separating the Lamb Weston business from the Company will provide financial, operational, managerial, and other benefits to us and our stockholders, the Spinoff may not provide such results on the scope, scale, or timeline we anticipate, and we may not realize the intended benefits of the Spinoff. In addition, we incurred one-time costs in connection with the Spinoff that may negate some of the benefits we expect to achieve. If we do not realize these assumed benefits, we could cause us to incur substantial costs, divert management’s attention and resources, and have ansuffer a material adverse effect on our business.
From time to time, wefinancial condition. In addition, our operational and financial profile changed upon the separation of the Lamb Weston business from the Company. As a result, the diversification of our revenue sources diminished, and our results of operations, cash flows, working capital, and financing requirements may be subject to proposalsincreased volatility as a result.
We may be exposed to claims and liabilities or incur operational difficulties as a result of the Spinoff.
The Spinoff continues to involve a number of risks, including, among other things, certain indemnification risks and risk associated with the provision of transitional services. In connection with the Spinoff, we entered into a separation and distribution agreement and various other agreements (including a transition services agreement, a tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement, and a trademark license agreement), which we refer to as the Lamb Weston agreements. The Lamb Weston agreements govern the Spinoff and the relationship between the two companies going forward. They also provide for the performance of services by stockholders urgingeach company for the benefit of the other for a period of time.
The Lamb Weston agreements provide for indemnification obligations designed to make Lamb Weston financially responsible for certain liabilities that may exist relating to its business activities, whether incurred prior to or after the distribution, including any pending or future litigation. It is possible that a court would disregard the allocation agreed to between us and Lamb Weston and require us to take certain corporate actions. If activist stockholder activities ensue,assume responsibility for obligations allocated to Lamb Weston. Third parties could also seek to hold us responsible for any of these liabilities or obligations, and the indemnity rights we have under the separation and distribution agreement may not be sufficient to fully cover all of these liabilities and obligations. Even if we are successful in obtaining indemnification, we may have to bear costs temporarily. In addition, our indemnity obligations to Lamb Weston may be significant. These risks could negatively affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
In addition, certain of the Lamb Weston agreements provide for the performance of services by each company for the benefit of the other for a period of time. As such, there is continued risk that management's and our employees' attention will be significantly diverted by the provision of transitional services. The Lamb Weston agreements could also lead to disputes over rights to certain shared property and rights and over the allocation of costs and revenues for products and operations. If Lamb Weston is unable to satisfy its obligations under these agreements, including its indemnification obligations, we could incur losses. Our inability to effectively manage separation activities and related events could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
The Spinoff could result in substantial tax liability.
The Spinoff is intended to qualify for tax-free treatment to the Company and its stockholders under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we refer to as the Code. Completion of the Spinoff was conditioned upon, among other things, our receipt of an opinion from our tax advisors that the distribution of shares of Lamb Weston in the Spinoff will qualify as tax-free to Lamb Weston, the Company, and our stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) and related provisions of the Code. The opinion relied on, among other things, various assumptions and representations as to factual matters made by the Company and Lamb Weston. If such assumptions or representations are inaccurate or incomplete in any material respect, the conclusions reached by such advisor in its opinion could be adversely affected because respondingjeopardized. The opinion is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service, which we refer to proxy contestsas the IRS, or the courts, and reacting to other actions by activist stockholdersthere can be costlyno assurance that the IRS or the courts will not challenge the qualification of the Spinoff as a transaction under Sections 355 and time-consuming, disrupt368(a) of the Code or that any such challenge would not prevail.
If the Spinoff is determined to be taxable, the Company and its stockholders could incur significant tax liabilities, which could adversely affect our operations and divertbusiness, financial condition, or results of operations.



Risks Relating to our Planned Acquisition of Pinnacle
Our planned acquisition of Pinnacle may not occur at all, may not occur in the attentionexpected time frame, or may involve the divestiture of managementcertain businesses, which may negatively affect the trading prices of our stock and our employees.future business and financial results.
On June 26, 2018, we entered into a definitive merger agreement with Pinnacle, pursuant to which, among other things and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of specified conditions, we will acquire all of the outstanding shares of Pinnacle common stock for cash and shares of Conagra Brands common stock. As a result of the planned acquisition of Pinnacle, Pinnacle shareholders are expected to own approximately 16% of the combined company.
Completion of the planned acquisition of Pinnacle is not assured and is subject to Pinnacle shareholder approval and the satisfaction or waiver of customary closing conditions, including, among others: the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended; and the receipt of other required antitrust approvals.
The planned acquisition of Pinnacle is subject to risks and uncertainties, including the risks that the necessary shareholder and regulatory approvals will not be obtained, the risk that the parties to the merger agreement may be required to divest certain businesses or assets in connection with the planned acquisition or that other closing conditions will not be satisfied. For example, in connection with obtaining the required regulatory approvals, the Company and/or Pinnacle may be required to divest assets of their respective businesses, subject to certain limitations set forth in the merger agreement (including that the Company shall not be required to divest any assets or business of the Company or Pinnacle that, in the aggregate, generated net sales in excess of $300.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year). If the planned acquisition of Pinnacle is not completed, if there are significant delays in completing the planned acquisition or if the planned acquisition involves the divestiture of certain businesses, it could negatively affect the trading prices of our common stock and our future business and financial results and could result in our failure to realize certain synergies relating to such acquisition.
Our obligation to complete the planned acquisition of Pinnacle is not subject to a financing condition, and we may be required to retainfinance a portion of the servicespurchase price at interest rates higher than currently expected.
Our obligation to complete the planned acquisition of various professionalsPinnacle is not subject to advise us on activist stockholder matters, including legal, financiala financing condition. We have obtained committed financing from Goldman Sachs Bank USA and communications advisors,Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC, and expect to obtain permanent financing for the costs ofplanned acquisition by accessing the capital markets, which may negatively impactinclude the issuance of long-term debt and equity. If any of the banks in the committed financing facilities are unable to perform their commitments, we may be required to finance a portion of the purchase price of the planned acquisition at interest rates higher than currently expected.
We may not realize the growth opportunities and cost synergies that are anticipated from the planned acquisition of Pinnacle.
The benefits that are expected to result from the planned acquisition of Pinnacle will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated growth opportunities and $215 million in cost synergies as a result of the planned acquisition. Our success in realizing these growth opportunities and cost synergies, and the timing of this realization, depends on whether the Company or Pinnacle are required to divest assets of their respective business and on the successful integration of Pinnacle. There is a significant degree of difficulty and management distraction inherent in the process of integrating an acquisition as sizable as Pinnacle. The process of integrating operations could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, our and Pinnacle's activities. Members of our senior management may be required to devote considerable amounts of time to this integration process, which will decrease the time they will have to manage our company, service existing customers, attract new customers, and develop new products or strategies. If senior management is not able to effectively manage the integration process, or if any significant business activities are interrupted as a result of the integration process, our business could suffer. There can be no assurance that we will successfully or cost-effectively integrate Pinnacle. The failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.


Even if we are able to integrate Pinnacle successfully, this integration may not result in the realization of the full benefits of the growth opportunities and cost synergies that we currently expect from this integration, and we cannot guarantee that these benefits will be achieved within anticipated time frames or at all. For example, we may not be able to eliminate duplicative costs. Moreover, we may incur substantial expenses in connection with the integration of Pinnacle. While it is anticipated that certain expenses will be incurred to achieve cost synergies, such expenses are difficult to estimate accurately, and may exceed current estimates. Accordingly, the benefits from the planned acquisition may be offset by costs incurred to, or delays in, integrating the businesses.
We will incur a substantial amount of debt to complete the planned acquisition of Pinnacle. To service our debt, we will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control. We also depend on the business of our subsidiaries to satisfy our cash needs. If we cannot generate the required cash, we may not be able to make the necessary payments required under our indebtedness.
At May 27, 2018, we had total debt of approximately $3.8 billion. We have the ability under our existing credit facilities to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future, and we plan to incur significant additional indebtedness if we complete the planned acquisition of Pinnacle. In connection with the acquisition, we expect to incur up to $8.3 billion of long-term debt, including for the payment of the cash portion of the merger consideration, the repayment of Pinnacle debt, the refinancing of certain Conagra debt, and the payment of related fees and expenses. Our ability to make payments on our debt, fund our other liquidity needs, and make planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. Our historical financial results have been, and we anticipate that our future financial results.results will be, subject to fluctuations. Our ability to generate cash, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory, and other factors that are beyond our control. We cannot guarantee that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from our operations or that future borrowings will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to make payments of our debt, fund other liquidity needs, and make planned capital expenditures.
The degree to which we are currently leveraged and will be leveraged following the completion of the planned acquisition could have important consequences for shareholders. For example, it could:
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of debt service, reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and other general corporate purposes;
increase our vulnerability to adverse economic or industry conditions;
limit our ability to obtain additional financing in the future to enable us to react to changes in our business; or
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to businesses in our industry that have less debt.
Additionally, any failure to comply with covenants in the instruments governing our debt could result in an event of default that, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse effect on us.
A significant portion of our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to generate sufficient cash flow for our needs is dependent to some extent on the earnings of our subsidiaries and the payment of those earnings to us in the form of dividends, loans, or advances and through repayment of loans or advances from us. Our subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities. Our subsidiaries have no obligation to pay any amounts due on our debt or to provide us with funds to meet our cash flow needs, whether in the form of dividends, distributions, loans, or other payments. In addition, perceived uncertainties asany payment of dividends, loans, or advances by our subsidiaries could be subject to statutory or contractual restrictions. Payments to us by our future direction, strategysubsidiaries will also be contingent upon our subsidiaries' earnings and business considerations. Our right to receive any assets of any of our subsidiaries upon their liquidation or leadership createdreorganization will be effectively subordinated to the claims of that subsidiary's creditors, including trade creditors. In addition, even if we are a creditor of any of our subsidiaries, our rights as a consequence of activist stockholder initiatives may resultcreditor would be subordinate to any security interest in the lossassets of potential business opportunities, harm our ability

12



subsidiaries and any indebtedness of our subsidiaries senior to attract new investors, customers, employee, and joint venture partners, and causethat held by us. Finally, changes in the laws of foreign jurisdictions in which we operate may adversely affect the ability of some of our stock priceforeign subsidiaries to experience periods of volatility or stagnation.repatriate funds to us.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.



ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our headquarters are located in Omaha, Nebraska. In addition, certainChicago, Illinois. Other shared service centers and a product development facility are located in Omaha, Nebraska, including a product development facility, enterprise business services center, and an information technology center. TheNebraska. We have general offices in Colorado, the District of Columbia, and location of principal operations are set forth in the following summary of our properties.Minnesota. We also lease a limited number of domestic sales offices. International general offices mainlyare located in Canada, Colombia, Mexico, Panama, and the United States.Philippines.
We maintain a number of stand-alone distribution facilities. In addition, there are warehouses at most of our manufacturing facilities.
Utilization of manufacturing capacity varies by manufacturing plant based upon the type of products assigned and the level of demand for those products. Management believes that our manufacturing and processing plants are well maintained and are generally adequate to support the current operations of the business.
As of July 20, 2018, we have thirty-three domestic manufacturing facilities located in Arkansas, California, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Washington, and Wisconsin. We also have international manufacturing facilities in Canada, Italy, and Mexico, and interests in ownership of international manufacturing facilities in India and Mexico.
We own most of theour manufacturing facilities. However, a limited number of plants and parcels of land with the related manufacturing equipment are leased. Substantially all of our transportation equipment and forward-positioned distribution centers containing finished goods are leased or operated by third parties. Information about the properties supporting
The majority of our three business segments follows.
Consumer Foods Reporting Segment
Domestic general offices supporting the Consumer Foodsmanufacturing assets are shared across multiple reporting segments. Output from these facilities used by each reporting segment are located in Omaha, Nebraska, Naperville, Illinois, Miami, Florida, and Madison, Tennessee. We also have international general offices in Canada, China, Columbia, Mexico, Panama, and Puerto Rico.
As of July 17, 2015, we have thirty-two domestic manufacturing facilities located in Arkansas, California, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Wisconsin. We also have international manufacturing facilities in Argentina, Canada, and Mexico and interests in ownership of international manufacturing facilities in India and Mexico.
Commercial Foods Reporting Segment
Domestic general offices supporting the Commercial Foods segment are located in Omaha, Nebraska, Eagle, Idaho, Downers Grove, Illinois, North Liberty, Iowa, and Tri-Cities, Washington. We also have international general offices in China, Japan, the Netherlands, and Singapore.
As of July 17, 2015, we have twenty domestic manufacturing facilities located in Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, New Jersey, Oregon, Tennessee, and Washington. We also have international manufacturing facilities in Canada and China; interests in ownership of domestic manufacturing facilities located in Minnesota and Washington; and interests in ownership of international manufacturing facilities located in Austria, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.
Private Brands Reporting Segment
We have a general office supporting the Private Brands segment located in St. Louis, Missouri.
As of July 17, 2015, we have twenty-nine domestic manufacturing facilities located in Alabama, Arizona, California, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, and Wisconsin. We also have international manufacturing facilities located in Canada and Italy.can change over time. Therefore, it is impracticable to disclose them by segment.


13



ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Litigation Matters

We are a party to various environmental proceedings andcertain litigation primarily relatedmatters relating to our acquisition of Beatrice Company (“Beatrice”("Beatrice") in fiscal 1991. As a result of the acquisition of Beatrice and the significant pre-acquisition contingencies of the Beatrice business and its former subsidiaries, our consolidated post-acquisition financial statements reflect liabilities associated with the estimated resolution of these contingencies. These include various1991, including litigation and environmental proceedings related to businesses divested by Beatrice prior to itsour acquisition by us. The litigation includesof the company. These proceedings include suits against a number of lead paint and pigment manufacturers, including ConAgra Grocery Products Company, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“("ConAgra Grocery Products”Products"), and the Company as alleged successorssuccessor to W. P. Fuller & Co., a lead paint and pigment manufacturer owned and operated by a predecessor to Beatrice from 1962 until 1967. These lawsuits generally seek damages for personal injury, property damage, economic loss, and governmental expenditures allegedly caused by the use of lead-based paint, and/or injunctive relief for inspection and abatement. Although decisions favorable to us have been rendered in Rhode Island, New Jersey, Wisconsin, and Ohio, we remain a defendant in active suits in Illinois and California. ConAgra Grocery Products has denied liability in both suits, both on the merits of the claims and on the basis that we do not believe it to be the successor to any liability attributable to W. P. Fuller & Co. The California suit is discussed in the following paragraph. The Illinois suit seeks class-wide relief infor reimbursement of costs associated with the form of medical monitoring for elevated levelstesting of lead levels in blood. We do not believe it is probable that we have incurred any liability with respect to the Illinois case, nor is it possible to estimate any potential exposure.
In California, a number of cities and counties have joined in a consolidated action seeking abatement of thean alleged public nuisance.nuisance in the form of lead-based paint potentially present on the interior of residences, regardless of its condition. On September 23, 2013, a trial of the California case concluded in the Superior Court of California for the County of Santa Clara, and on January 27, 2014, the court entered Judgmenta judgment (the "Judgment") against ConAgra Grocery Products and two other defendants which ordersordering the creation of a California abatement fund in the amount of $1.15 billion. Liability is joint and several. The Company believes ConAgra Grocery Products did not inherit any liabilities of W. P. Fuller Co. The Company will continue to vigorously defend itself in this case and has appealed the Judgment, toand on November 14, 2017 the California Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District reversed in part, holding that the defendants were not liable to pay for abatement of homes built after 1950, but affirmed the Judgment as to homes built before 1951. The Court of Appeal remanded the case to the trial court with directions to recalculate the amount of the Stateabatement fund estimated to be necessary to cover the cost of California Sixth Appellate District. The Company expects the appeal process will last several years. The absenceremediating pre-1951 homes, and to hold an evidentiary hearing regarding appointment of any linkage betweena suitable receiver. ConAgra Grocery Products and W. P. Fuller Co.the other defendants petitioned the California Supreme Court for review of the decision, which we believe to be an unprecedented expansion of current California law. On February 14, 2018, the California Supreme Court denied the petition and declined to review the merits of the case, and the case was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. ConAgra Grocery Products and the other defendants have indicated that they will seek further review of certain issues from the Supreme Court of the


United States, although further appeal is discretionary and may not be granted. Further proceedings in the trial court may not be stayed pending the outcome of any further appeal. In light of the decision rendered by the California Appellate Court on November 14, 2017, and the California Supreme Court's decision on February 14, 2018 not to review the Appellate Court's decision, we have concluded that the liability has likely become probable as contemplated by Accounting Standards Codification Topic 450, however many uncertainties remain which make it difficult to estimate the potential liability, including the following: (i) the trial court has not yet recalculated its estimate of the amount needed to remediate pre-1951 homes in the plaintiff jurisdictions or entered a new judgment to replace the one vacated by the California Appellate Court; (ii) although liability is joint and several, it is unknown what amount each defendant may ultimately be required to pay or how allocation among the defendants (and other potentially responsible parties such as property owners who may have violated the applicable housing codes) will be determined; (iii) according to the trial court's original order, participation in the abatement program by eligible homeowners is voluntary and it is unknown what percentage of eligible homeowners will choose to participate or how such claims will be administered; (iv) the trial court's original order required that any amounts paid by the defendants into the fund that were not spent within four years would be returned to the defendants, and it is unknown whether this feature of the fund will be retained or, if it is retained, how much will be spent during that time period; and (v) defendants will have a new right to appeal any new aspects of the judgment entered by the trial court upon remand, although it is unknown whether the court would stay execution of any new judgment while a subsequent appeal is pending.

To assist the trial court in satisfying its responsibilities, during our fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, the defendants and plaintiff each submitted information to the court regarding recalculation of the abatement fund. In addition, one of the defendants entered into a proposed settlement with the plaintiff, contingent upon a judicial good faith determination under California law. We are uncertain as to when the court will make a ruling on a recalculated abatement fund or the proposed settlement. Notwithstanding the uncertainties described above, this additional information was used by the Company in concluding that a loss is now reasonably estimable. While the ultimate amount of any loss and timing of payments related thereto remain uncertain and could change as further information is obtained, we believe that our share of the loss could range from $60 million to $335 million and have recorded a liability for the amount in that range that we believe is a critical issue thatbetter estimate than the Company will continue to advance throughoutlow or high ends of the appeals process. It is not possible to estimate exposure in this case or the remaining case in Illinois (which is based on different legal theories). If ultimately necessary, the Company will look to its insurance policies for coverage; its carriers are on notice. However, therange. The extent of the insurance coverage is uncertain and the Company's carriers are on notice; however, any possible insurance recovery has not been considered for purposes of determining our liability. The Company cannot absolutely assure that the final resolution of these matters will not a have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
The environmental proceedings associated with Beatrice include litigation and administrative proceedings involving Beatrice's status as a potentially responsible party at 37 Superfund, proposed Superfund, or state-equivalent sites. These sites involve locations previously owned or operated by predecessors of Beatrice that used or produced petroleum, pesticides, fertilizers, dyes, inks, solvents, PCBs, acids, lead, sulfur, tannery wastes, and/or other contaminants. Beatrice has paid or is in the process of paying its liability share at 33 of these sites. Reserves for these matters have been established based on our best estimate of the undiscounted remediation liabilities, which estimates include evaluation of investigatory studies, extent of required clean-up, the known volumetric contribution of Beatrice and other potentially responsible parties, and its experience in remediating sites. The reserves for Beatrice-related environmental matters totaled $53.7 million as of May 31, 2015, a majority of which relates to the Superfund and state-equivalent sites referenced above. We expect expenditures for Beatrice-related environmental matters to continue for up to 18 years.
We are also a party to a number of lawsuits and claims arising out of our ongoing business operations. Among these, there are lawsuits, claims, and matters related to the February 2007 recall of our peanut butter products. Among the matters outstanding during fiscal 2015 related to the peanut butter recall was an investigation by the U.S. Attorney's office in Georgia and the Consumer Protection Branch of the Department of Justice into the 2007 recall. Just prior to the end of fiscal 2015, we negotiated a resolution of this matter, which resulted in an executed plea agreement pursuant to which ConAgra Grocery Products will plead guilty to a single misdemeanor violation of the Food, Drug & Cosmetics Act. If the plea is accepted by the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, the government’s investigation into the 2007 recall will conclude and ConAgra Grocery Products will make payments totaling $11.2 million to the federal government. Expenses related to this payment were accrued in previous periods. During fiscal 2013 and 2012, we recognized charges of $7.5 million and $17.5 million, respectively, in connection with this matter. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we reduced our accrual by $6.7 million. During the first quarter of fiscal 2015, we further reduced our accrual by $5.8 million and further reduced it by $1.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2015, based on ongoing discussions with the U.S. Attorney's office and the Department of Justice. The plea agreement is subject to Court approval, which will be sought along with the formal sentencing process in the coming months.
In June 2009, an accidental explosion occurred at our manufacturing facility in Garner, North Carolina. This facility was the primary production facility for our Slim Jim® branded meat snacks. In June 2009, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives announced its determination that the explosion was the result of an accidental natural gas release and not a deliberate act. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we settled our property and business interruption claims related to the Garner accident with our insurance providers. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. ("Jacobs"), our engineer and project manager at the site, filed a declaratory judgment action against us seeking indemnity for personal injury claims brought against it as a result of the accident. InDuring the first quarter of fiscal 2012, our motion for summary

14



judgment was granted and the suit was dismissed without prejudice on the basis that the suit was filed prematurely. In the third quarter of fiscal 2014, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. refiled its action forseeking indemnity. On March 25, 2016, a Douglas County jury in Nebraska rendered a verdict in favor of Jacobs and against us in the amount of $108.9 million plus post-judgment interest. We filed our Notice of Appeal in September 2016, the appeal was heard by the Nebraska Supreme Court in November 2017, and the case is awaiting decision by the Nebraska Supreme Court. The appeal will continue to defend this action vigorously. Anybe decided directly by the Nebraska Supreme Court. Although our insurance carriers have provided customary notices of reservation of their rights under the policies of insurance, we expect any ultimate exposure in this case is expected to be limited to the applicable insurance deductible, althoughdeductible.
We are party to a number of putative class action lawsuits challenging various product claims made in the Company's product labeling. These matters include Briseno v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., in which it is alleged that the labeling for Wesson® oils as 100% natural is false and misleading because the oils contain genetically modified plants and organisms. In February 2015, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted class certification to permit plaintiffs to pursue state law claims. The Company appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which affirmed class certification in January 2017. The Supreme Court of the United States declined to review the decision and the case has been remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. While we cannot predict with certainty the results of this or any other legal proceeding, we do not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect on our insurance carriers have reserved their rightsfinancial condition, results of operations, or business.
We are party to matters challenging the Company's wage and hour practices. These matters include a number of putative class actions consolidated under the policiescaption Negrete v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., et al, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of insurance.California, in which the plaintiffs allege a pattern of violations of California and/or federal law at several


current and former Company manufacturing facilities across the State of California. While we cannot predict with certainty the results of this or any other legal proceeding, we do not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or business.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, we accrued $151.0 million in new legal reserves relating to the matters set forth above.
Environmental Matters
We are a party to certain environmental proceedings relating to our acquisition of Beatrice in fiscal 1991. Such proceedings include proceedings related to businesses divested by Beatrice prior to our acquisition of Beatrice.  The current environmental proceedings associated with Beatrice include litigation and administrative proceedings involving Beatrice's possible status as a potentially responsible party at approximately 40 Superfund, proposed Superfund, or state-equivalent sites (the "Beatrice sites"). These sites involve locations previously owned or operated by predecessors of Beatrice that used or produced petroleum, pesticides, fertilizers, dyes, inks, solvents, PCBs, acids, lead, sulfur, tannery wastes, and/or other contaminants. In the past five years, Beatrice has paid or is in the process of paying its liability share at 31 of these sites. Reserves for these Beatrice environmental proceedings have been established based on our best estimate of the undiscounted remediation liabilities, which estimates include evaluation of investigatory studies, extent of required clean-up, the known volumetric contribution of Beatrice and other potentially responsible parties, and its experience in remediating sites. The accrual for Beatrice-related environmental matters totaled $52.4 million as of May 27, 2018, a majority of which relates to the Superfund and state-equivalent sites referenced above. During the third quarter of fiscal 2017, a final Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study was submitted for the Southwest Properties portion of the Wells G&H Superfund site, which is one of the Beatrice sites. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA") issued a Record of Decision (the "ROD") for the Southwest Properties portion of the site on September 29, 2017, and has entered into negotiations with potentially responsible parties to determine final responsibility for implementing the ROD.
General Matters
After taking into account liabilities recognized for all of the foregoing matters, management believes the ultimate resolution of such matters should not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.liquidity; however, it is reasonably possible that a change of the estimates of any of the foregoing matters may occur in the future and, as noted, the lead paint matter could result in a material final judgment.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, where it trades under the ticker symbol: CAG. At June 28, 2015,24, 2018, there were approximately 19,70016,854 shareholders of record.
Quarterly sales price and dividend information is set forth in Note 22 "Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)" to the consolidated financial statements and incorporated herein by reference.


Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The following table presents the total number of shares of common stock purchased during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015,2018, the average price paid per share, the number of shares that were purchased as part of a publicly announced repurchase program, and the approximate dollar value of the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the share repurchase program:
Period
Total Number
of Shares (or
units)
Purchased
 
Average
Price Paid
per Share
(or unit)
 
Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs (1)
 
Approximate Dollar
Value of Maximum
Number of Shares that
may yet be Purchased
under the Program (1)
February 23 through March 22, 2015332,208
 $34.77
 332,208
 $131,927,000
March 23 through April 19, 2015
 $
 
 $131,927,000
April 20 through May 31, 2015
 $
 
 $131,927,000
Total Fiscal 2015 Fourth Quarter Activity332,208
 $34.77
 332,208
 $131,927,000
Period
Total Number
of Shares (or
units)
Purchased
 
Average
Price Paid
per Share
(or unit)
 
Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs (1)
 
Approximate Dollar
Value of Maximum
Number of Shares that
may yet be Purchased
under the Program (1)
February 26 through March 25, 2018
 $
 
 $521,968,000
March 26 through April 22, 20181,680,824
 $37.10
 1,680,824
 $459,599,000
April 23 through May 27, 20181,217,467
 $36.88
 1,217,467
 $1,414,700,000
Total Fiscal 2018 Fourth Quarter Activity2,898,291
 $37.00
 2,898,291
 $1,414,700,000

(1) 
Pursuant to publicly announced share repurchase programs from December 2003, we have repurchased approximately 168.1220.6 million shares at a cost of $4.2$6.14 billion through May 31, 2015.27, 2018. On October 11, 2016, we announced that our Board of Directors approved an increase of $1.25 billion to the share repurchase program. We announced that our Board of Directors approved further increases to the share repurchase program of $1.0 billion each on June 29, 2017 and June 27, 2018, respectively. The currentshare repurchase program is effective and has no expiration date.


15



ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
For the Fiscal Years Ended May 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Dollars in millions, except per share amounts                    
Net sales (1)
 $15,832.4
 $15,843.6
 $13,469.3
 $11,420.9
 $10,746.0
 $7,938.3
 $7,826.9
 $8,664.1
 $9,034.0
 $9,041.7
Income (loss) from continuing operations (1)(2)
 $(607.4) $173.7
 $698.4
 $396.8
 $714.9
Net income (loss) attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. (2)
 $(252.6) $303.1
 $773.9
 $467.9
 $817.6
Income from continuing operations (1)
 $797.5
 $546.0
 $128.5
 $451.3
 $325.4
Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. (2)
 $808.4
 $639.3
 $(677.0) $(252.6) $303.1
Basic earnings per share:                    
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders (1)(2)
 $(1.46) $0.38
 $1.67
 $0.94
 $1.66
Net income (loss) attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders (2)
 $(0.60) $0.72
 $1.88
 $1.13
 $1.90
Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders (1)
 $1.97
 $1.26
 $0.29
 $1.05
 $0.77
Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders (2)
 $2.00
 $1.48
 $(1.57) $(0.60) $0.72
Diluted earnings per share:                    
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders (1)(2)
 $(1.46) $0.37
 $1.64
 $0.93
 $1.64
Net income (loss) attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders (2)
 $(0.60) $0.70
 $1.85
 $1.12
 $1.88
Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders (1)
 $1.95
 $1.25
 $0.29
 $1.04
 $0.76
Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders (2)
 $1.98
 $1.46
 $(1.56) $(0.59) $0.70
Cash dividends declared per share of common stock $1.00
 $1.00
 $0.99
 $0.95
 $0.89
 $0.85
 $0.90
 $1.00
 $1.00
 $1.00
At Year-End                    
Total assets $17,542.2
 $19,319.5
 $20,349.7
 $11,431.7
 $11,400.5
 $10,389.5
 $10,096.3
 $13,390.6
 $17,437.8
 $19,241.5
Senior long-term debt (noncurrent)(1) $6,693.0
 $8,524.6
 $8,635.3
 $2,652.3
 $2,666.1
 $3,035.6
 $2,573.3
 $4,685.5
 $6,676.0
 $8,507.0
Subordinated long-term debt (noncurrent) $195.9
 $195.9
 $195.9
 $195.9
 $195.9
 $195.9
 $195.9
 $195.9
 $195.9
 $195.9
 
(1) 
Amounts exclude the impact of discontinued operations of the Gilroy Foods & Flavors™ operations, the frozen handhelds operations, the Lightlife® operations, the Medallion Foods operations, and the ConAgra Mills operations, the Private Brands operations, and the Lamb Weston operations.
(2) 
Amounts include aggregate pre-tax goodwill and intangiblecertain long-lived asset impairment charges in discontinued operations of $1.57$1.92 billion, $1.56 billion, and $681.1$596.2 million for fiscal 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.


16





ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis is intended to provide a summary of significant factors relevant to our financial performance and condition. The discussion and analysis should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Results for the fiscal year ended May 31, 201527, 2018, are not necessarily indicative of results that may be attained in the future.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The information contained in this report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Examples of forward-looking statements include statements regarding our expected future financial performance or position, results of operations, business strategy, plans and objectives of management for future operations, and other statements that are not historical facts. You can identify forward-looking statements by their use of forward-looking words, such as "may", "will", "anticipate", "expect", "believe", "estimate", "intend", "plan", "should", "seek", or comparable terms.
Readers of this report should understand that these forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance or results. Forward-looking statements provide our current expectations and beliefs concerning future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and factors relating to our business and operations, all of which are difficult to predict and could cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties, and factors include, among other things: the failure to obtain Pinnacle Foods Inc. ("Pinnacle") shareholder approval of the merger agreement; the possibility that the closing conditions to the planned acquisition of Pinnacle may not be satisfied or waived, including that a governmental entity may prohibit, delay, or refuse to grant a necessary regulatory approval and any conditions imposed on the combined entity in connection with consummation of the planned acquisition of Pinnacle; delay in closing the planned acquisition of Pinnacle or the possibility of non-consummation of the planned acquisition; the risk that the cost savings and any other synergies from the planned acquisition of Pinnacle may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected, including that the planned acquisition may not be accretive within the expected timeframe or to the extent anticipated; the occurrence of any event that could give rise to termination of the merger agreement; the risk that shareholder litigation in connection with the planned acquisition of Pinnacle may affect the timing or occurrence of the planned acquisition or result in significant costs of defense, indemnification, and liability; risks related to the disruption of the planned acquisition of Pinnacle to us and our management; the effect of the announcement of the planned acquisition of Pinnacle on our ability to retain and hire key personnel and maintain relationships with customers, suppliers, and other third parties; our ability to achieve the intended benefits of recent and pending acquisitions and divestitures, including the recent spin-off of our Lamb Weston business; the continued evaluation of the role of our Wesson® oil business; general economic and industry conditions; our ability to successfully execute our long-term value creation strategy; our ability to access capital on acceptable terms or at all; our ability to execute our operating and restructuring plans and achieve our targeted operating efficiencies from cost-saving initiatives and to benefit from trade optimization programs; the effectiveness of our hedging activities and our ability to respond to volatility in commodities; the competitive environment and related market conditions; our ability to respond to changing consumer preferences and the success of our innovation and marketing investments; the ultimate impact of any product recalls and litigation, including litigation related to the lead paint and pigment matters; actions of governments and regulatory factors affecting our businesses, including the ultimate impact of recently enacted U.S. tax legislation and related regulations or interpretations; the availability and prices of raw materials, including any negative effects caused by inflation or weather conditions; risks and uncertainties associated with intangible assets, including any future goodwill or intangible assets impairment charges; and other risks described in our reports filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). We caution readers not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no responsibility to update these statements, except as required by law.
The discussion that follows should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in this report. Results for fiscal 2018 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be attained in the future.


EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
ConAgra Foods,Conagra Brands, Inc. (NYSE: CAG)(the "Company", "we", "us", or "our"), headquartered in Chicago, is one of North America's largest packaged food companies with branded and privateleading branded food found in 99%companies. Guided by an entrepreneurial spirit, the Company combines a rich heritage of America's households, as well asmaking great food with a strong commercial foods business serving restaurants and foodservice operations globally. Consumers can find recognizedsharpened focus on innovation. The Company's portfolio is evolving to satisfy people's changing food preferences. Its iconic brands such as BanquetMarie Callender's®, Chef BoyardeeReddi-wip®, Egg BeatersHunt's®, Healthy Choice®, Hebrew National®, Hunt's®, Marie Callender'sSlim Jim®, Orville Redenbacher's®, as well as emerging brands, including PAM®, Peter PanAlexia®, Reddi-wipAngie's® BOOMCHICKAPOP®, Slim JimBlake's®, Snack PackDuke's®, and many other ConAgra FoodsFrontera®, offer choices for every occasion.
Fiscal 2018 performance compared to fiscal 2017 reflected improving net sales trends, due to innovation and renovation of some of our largest brands along with food soldand enhanced marketing methods. Higher gross profits in the International and Foodservice segments were offset by ConAgra Foods under private brand labels,slightly lower gross profits in grocery, convenience, mass merchandise, club,the Grocery & Snacks and drug stores. Additionally, ConAgra Foods supplies frozen and sweet potato products as well as other vegetable, spice, bakery, and grain products to commercial and foodservice customers.
Management's primary objective forRefrigerated & Frozen segments. Despite a challenging inflationary environment, we achieved significantly improved earnings in fiscal 2015 was stabilization and recovery. Fiscal 20152018. The improved operating performance reflected increased volumes in the Consumer Foods and Commercial Foods segments, primarily due to the extra week in the fiscal year. Private Brands performance continued to reflect weak volumes and margin pressures resulting from an intense bidding environment and executional challenges. We generated operating cash flows of approximately $1.47 billion from continuing operations and repaid $1.1 billion of debt during fiscal 2015.
Subsequent to fiscal 2015, on June 30, 2015, we announced our plan to exit the Private Brands operations. Our plans for creating long-term value will center on a more aggressive approach to driving margin improvement throughsignificantly lower selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses and lower interest expense, reductions, supply chain efficiencies,in each case compared to fiscal 2017.
On December 22, 2017, the 2017 U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Act") was signed into law. The Tax Act reduces tax rates and modifies certain policies, credits, and deductions and has certain international tax consequences. The Tax Act reduces the federal corporate tax rate from a maximum of 35% to a flat 21% rate. The Tax Act's corporate rate reduction became effective January 1, 2018, in the middle of our third quarter. Given our off-calendar fiscal year-end, our fiscal 2018 federal statutory tax rate was a blended rate. Our federal statutory rate will reduce to 21% in fiscal 2019. As a result, we were required to revalue our deferred tax assets and liabilities to account for the future impact of lower corporate tax rates and other projects. It also focuses on growing our Consumer Foodsprovisions of the Tax Act. These changes resulted in a one-time estimated income tax benefit of $233.3 million for fiscal 2018. This amount may be adjusted in the future as further information and Commercial Foods segments, as well as balanced capital allocation.interpretations become available.
Diluted lossearnings per share in fiscal 2015 was $0.60,2018 were $1.98, including a lossearnings of $1.46$1.95 per diluted share from continuing operations and earnings of $0.86$0.03 per diluted share from discontinued operations. Diluted earnings per share in fiscal 20142017 were $0.70,$1.46, including $0.37earnings of $1.25 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.33$0.21 per diluted share from discontinued operations. Several significant items affect the comparability of year-over-year results of continuing operations (see "Items Impacting Comparability”Comparability" below).
On June 26, 2018, subsequent to the end of fiscal 2018, we entered into a definitive merger agreement (the "Merger Agreement") with Pinnacle and Patriot Merger Sub Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of us ("Merger Sub"). The Merger Agreement provides for, among other things, the merger of Merger Sub with and into Pinnacle, with Pinnacle continuing as the surviving corporation. As a result of the merger, Merger Sub will cease to exist, and Pinnacle will survive as our wholly-owned subsidiary.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the merger, each share of Pinnacle common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than shares as to which dissenter's rights have been properly exercised and certain other excluded shares) will be converted into the right to receive (i) $43.11 in cash and (ii) 0.6494 shares of our common stock, with cash payable in lieu of fractional shares of our common stock. The implied price of $68.00 per Pinnacle share is based on the volume-weighted average price of our stock for the five days ended June 21, 2018.
We have secured $9.0 billion in fully committed bridge financing from affiliates of Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in connection with the planned acquisition of Pinnacle. The commitments under the committed bridge financing were subsequently reduced by the amounts of a term loan agreement we entered into on July 11, 2018 with a syndicate of financial institutions providing for term loans to us in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1.3 billion. The funding under the term loan agreement is anticipated to occur simultaneously with the closing date of the acquisition. In connection with the merger, we expect to incur up to $8.3 billion of long-term debt (which includes any funding under the new term loan agreement), including for the payment of the cash portion of the merger consideration, the repayment of Pinnacle debt, the refinancing of certain Conagra debt, and the payment of related fees and expenses. The permanent financing is also expected to include approximately $600 million of incremental cash proceeds from the issuance of equity and/or divestitures.
The planned acquisition of Pinnacle is expected to close by the end of calendar 2018 and is subject to customary closing conditions, including (i) the adoption of the Merger Agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of all outstanding Pinnacle common stock, (ii) there being no law or order that restrains, enjoins, or otherwise prohibits the consummation of the planned acquisition or the issuance of our common stock in connection with the planned acquisition, and (iii) the expiration of the waiting period applicable to the planned acquisition under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust


Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and receipt of other required antitrust approvals. The obligation of each of us and Pinnacle to consummate the planned acquisition is also conditioned on the other party's representations and warranties being true and correct (subject to certain materiality exceptions) and the other party having performed, in all material respects, its obligations under the Merger Agreement. The closing of the planned acquisition is not subject to a financing condition.
Items Impacting Comparability
Items of note impacting comparability of results from continuing operations for fiscal 2018 included the following:
an income tax benefit of $233.3 million related to the enactment of the Tax Act,
charges totaling $151.0 million ($113.3 million after-tax) related to certain litigation matters,
an income tax expense of $78.6 million associated with a change in a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset due to the termination of the agreement for the proposed sale of our Wesson® oil business,
an income tax charge of $42.1 million associated with unusual tax items related to the repatriation of cash during the second quarter from foreign subsidiaries, the tax expense related to the earnings of foreign subsidiaries previously deemed to be permanently invested, a pension contribution, and the effect of a law change in Mexico requiring deconsolidation for tax reporting purposes,
charges totaling $34.9 million ($25.6 million after-tax) related to the early termination of an unfavorable lease contract by purchasing the property subject to the lease,
charges totaling $38.0 million ($27.0 million after-tax) in connection with our SCAE Plan (as defined below),
charges totaling $15.7 million ($10.9 million after-tax) associated with costs incurred for acquisitions and divestitures,
charges totaling $5.4 million ($3.7 million after-tax) related to pension plan lump-sum settlements and a remeasurement of our salaried and non-qualified pension plan liability,
charges totaling $4.8 million ($3.7 million after-tax) related to the impairment of other intangible assets, and
a benefit of $4.3 million ($2.9 million after-tax) related to the substantial liquidation of an international joint venture (recorded in equity method investment earnings).
Items of note impacting comparability of results from continuing operations for fiscal 2017 included the following:
charges totaling $304.2 million ($257.7 million after-tax) related to the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets,
gains totaling $197.4 million ($68.4 million after-tax) from the sales of the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses,
charges totaling $93.3 million ($60.2 million after-tax) related to the early retirement of debt,
an income tax benefit of $91.3 million related to a tax adjustment of valuation allowance associated with the planned divestiture of the Wesson® oil business,
charges totaling $63.6 million ($41.4 million after-tax) in connection with the SCAE Plan,
charges totaling $31.4 million ($19.6 million after-tax), including an impairment charge of $27.6 million related to the production assets of the business, for the planned divestiture of the Wesson® oil business,
an income tax benefit of $14.6 million associated with a tax planning strategy that allowed us to utilize certain state tax attributes and certain foreign incentives,
charges totaling $13.8 million ($8.5 million after-tax) related to a pension lump sum settlement, and
a gain of $5.7 million ($3.7 million after-tax) in connection with a legacy legal matter.


Segment presentation of gains and losses from derivatives used for economic hedging of anticipated commodity input costs and economic hedging of foreign currency exchange rate risks of anticipated transactions is discussed in the segment review below.
Items of note impacting comparability for fiscal 2015 included the following:Acquisitions
charges of $1.59 billion ($1.46 billion after-tax) relatedAs noted above, on June 26, 2018, subsequent to the impairmentend of fiscal 2018, we entered into the Merger Agreement with Pinnacle under which we will acquire all outstanding shares of Pinnacle common stock in a cash and stock transaction valued at approximately $10.9 billion, including Pinnacle's outstanding net debt. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Pinnacle shareholders will receive $43.11 per share in cash and 0.6494 shares of our common stock for each share of Pinnacle common stock held. The planned acquisition is expected to close by the end of calendar 2018 and remains subject to the approval of Pinnacle shareholders, the receipt of regulatory approvals, and other customary closing conditions.
In February 2018, we acquired the Sandwich Bros. of Wisconsin® business, maker of frozen breakfast and entree flatbread pocket sandwiches, for a cash purchase price of $87.3 million, net of cash acquired. Approximately $57.8 million has been classified as goodwill, subject to final purchase price allocation, and $9.7 million and $7.1 million have been classified as non-amortizing and amortizing intangible assets, respectively. The amount of goodwill other intangibles,allocated is deductible for tax purposes. The business is included in the Refrigerated & Frozen segment.
In October 2017, we acquired Angie's Artisan Treats, LLC, maker of Angie's®BOOMCHICKAPOP® ready-to-eat popcorn, for a cash purchase price of $249.8 million, net of cash acquired. Approximately $155.2 million has been classified as goodwill, subject to final purchase price allocation, of which $95.4 million is deductible for income tax purposes. Approximately $73.8 million and fixed assets impacting reporting units within our Private Brands segment,
charges of $85.5$10.3 million ($54.0 million after-tax) under our restructuring plans,
charges of $24.6 million ($15.1 million after-tax) related to early extinguishment of debt as a result of the payoffpurchase price have been allocated to non-amortizing and amortizing intangible assets, respectively. The business is primarily included in the Grocery & Snacks segment.
In April 2017, we acquired protein-based snacking businesses Thanasi Foods LLC, maker of our term loan facilityDuke’s® meat snacks, and the repurchaseBIGS LLC, maker of certain senior notes,
chargesBIGS® seeds, for $217.6 million in cash, net of $16.3cash acquired (the "Thanasi acquisition"). Approximately $133.3 million ($10.1has been classified as goodwill, of which $70.5 million after-tax) in support of our integrationis deductible for income tax purposes. Approximately $65.1 million and $16.1 million of the former Ralcorp Holdings, Inc. ("Ralcorp") business,purchase price have been allocated to non-amortizing and amortizing intangible assets, respectively. These businesses are primarily included in the Grocery & Snacks segment.
a benefit of $7.0 million ($7.0 million after-tax) related to the reduction of the legal accrual for matters associated with the 2007 peanut butter recall,
a charge of $6.9 million ($4.2 million after-tax) reflecting the write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of our pension liability,

17



charges of $5.1 million ($3.2 million after-tax) related to other intangible asset impairments in our Consumer Foods and Commercial Foods segments,
a charge of $3.7 million ($2.3 million after-tax) in connection with a legal matter, and
income tax benefits of $10.9 million from the implementation of a new tax position for federal tax credits and generation of state tax credits, relating to prior tax years.
In addition, fiscal 2015 income per share benefited by approximately $.04 as a result of the fiscal year including 53 weeks.
Items of note impacting comparability for fiscal 2014 included the following:
a charge of $605.4 million ($574.8 million after-tax) related to the impairment of goodwill and other intangibles impacting reporting units within our Private Brands segment,
charges totaling $95.5 million ($59.9 million after-tax) in connection with our restructuring plans,
charges of $75.7 million ($47.7 million after-tax) related to other intangible asset impairments, primarily relating to the Chef Boyardee brand,
a loss of $54.9 million ($34.4 million after-tax) related to forward starting swaps that were terminated in February 2014 upon the Company's decision to not refinance debt which matured in fiscal 2014,
charges of $53.0 million ($33.3 million after-tax) in support of our integration of the former Ralcorp business,
a charge of $16.5 million ($10.4 million after-tax) in connection with the impairment of a small production facility,
a benefit of $10.2 million ($8.8 million after-tax) related to legal matters associated with the 2007 peanut butter recall, including a reduction of the legal accrual for matters associated with the recall (which is not tax deductible) and the reimbursement of settlement and defense costs from an insurer,
a charge of $8.9 million ($5.6 million after-tax) in connection with the impairment of certain assets received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier,
charges of $6.4 million ($3.9 million after-tax) of transaction-related costs,
a benefit of $5.1 million ($3.2 million after-tax) in connection with the sale of land received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier,
a charge of $3.4 million ($2.6 million after-tax) reflecting the write-off of our share of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of the pension liability for an international potato venture, classified within equity method investment earnings, and
income tax benefits of $66.4 million from a change in estimate related to tax methods used for certain international sales, changes in deferred state tax rates relating to various changes in legal structure and state tax filing positions, resolution of foreign tax matters that were previously reserved, the effect of a law change in Mexico requiring deconsolidation for tax reporting purposes, and the resolution of certain income tax matters related to dispositions of foreign operations in prior years.
Acquisitions
On May 12, 2015,September 2016, we acquired Blake's All Naturalthe operating assets of Frontera Foods, a family-owned company specializing in all naturalInc. and organic frozen meals,Red Fork LLC, including pot pies, casseroles, pasta dishes,the Frontera®, Red Fork®, and other entrees,Salpica® brands (the "Frontera acquisition"). These businesses make authentic, gourmet Mexican food products and contemporary American cooking sauces. We acquired the businesses for $20.7$108.1 million in cash, net of cash acquired. Approximately $39.5 million has been classified as goodwill and $59.5 million and $7.2 million have been classified as non-amortizing and amortizing intangible assets, respectively. The purchaseamount allocated to goodwill is deductible for tax purposes. These businesses are included property and equipment associated with making frozen meals. This business is includedprimarily in the Consumer FoodsGrocery & Snacks segment, and to a lesser extent within the Refrigerated & Frozen and International segments.
Divestitures
During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we signed a definitive agreement to sell our Del Monte®processedfruit and vegetable business in Canada, which is part of our International segment. The transaction was completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, and was valued at approximately $43.0 million Canadian dollars, which was approximately $34.0 million U.S. dollars at the exchange rate on the date of announcement.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we signed an agreement to sell our Wesson® oil business, which is part of our Grocery & Snacks segment, to The J.M. Smucker Company ("Smucker"). In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, Conagra Brands and Smucker terminated the agreement. This outcome followed the decision of the Federal Trade Commission, announced on March 5, 2018, to challenge the pending sale. The Company is still actively marketing the Wesson® oil business and expects to sell it within the next twelve months.
On November 9, 2016, we completed the previously announced spinoff (the "Spinoff") of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. ("Lamb Weston"). The results of operations of the Lamb Weston business have been reclassified to discontinued operations for all periods presented.
In July 2014,the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we acquired TaiMei Potato Industry Limited, a Chinese potato processor,completed the sales of our Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings business ("Spicetec") and our JM Swank business for $92.2 million, consistingcombined proceeds of $74.9 million in cash, net$489.0 million. The results of cash acquired, plus assumed liabilities. The purchase included propertyoperations of Spicetec and equipment associated with making frozen potato products. This business isJM Swank are included in the Commercial Foods segment.

18




In September 2013, we acquired frozen dessert production assets from Harlan Bakeries for $39.9 million in cash. TheOn February 1, 2016, pursuant to the stock purchase included machinery, operating systems, warehousing/storage, and other assets associatedagreement, dated as of November 1, 2015, with making frozen fruit pies, cream pies, pastry shells, and loaf cakes. This business is included in the ConsumerTreeHouse Foods, segment.
Discontinued Operations
In April 2014,Inc. ("TreeHouse"), we completed the saledisposition of our Private Brands business to TreeHouse for $2.6 billion in cash on a small snack business, Medallion Foods, for $32.0 million in cash.debt-free basis. The business results were previously reflected inof operations of the Private Brands segment. We reflected the results of these operationsbusiness have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Restructuring Plans
In SeptemberMay 2013, we completed the sale of the assets of the Lightlife®business for $54.7 million in cash. The business results were previously reflected in the Consumer Foods segment. We reflected the results of these operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Formation of Ardent Mills
On May 29, 2014, the Company, Cargill, Incorporated, and CHS, Inc. completed the formation of Ardent Mills. In connection with the formation, we contributed all of the assets of ConAgra Mills, including $49.0 million of cash, to Ardent Mills, we received a 44% ownership interest in Ardent Mills, and Ardent Mills distributed $391.4 million in cash to us as a return of capital. The contribution of the assets of ConAgra Mills in exchange for a non-controlling interest in the newly formed joint venture is required to be accounted for at fair value, and, accordingly, we recognized a gain of $625.6 million ($379.6 million after-tax) in fiscal 2015 in income from discontinued operations, to reflect the excess of the fair value of our interest over its carrying value at the time of the transfer. As part of the formation of Ardent Mills, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, pursuant to an agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice, we sold three flour milling facilities to Miller Milling Company LLC for $163.0 million. We received the cash proceeds from the sale of these flour milling facilities in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. In the first quarter of fiscal 2015, we used the net cash proceeds from the Ardent Mills transaction to repay debt. The operating results of our legacy milling business, including the disposition of three mills aforementioned, are included as discontinued operations and our equity in the earnings of Ardent Mills is reflected in our continuing operations within our Consolidated Statement of Operations. The related assets and liabilities have been reclassified as assets and liabilities held for sale within our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet for the period presented prior to divestiture.
Restructuring Plans
We previously announced a plan for the integration and restructuring of the operations of Ralcorp, optimization of the entire Company's supply chain network, manufacturing assets, and dry distribution and mixing centers, and improvement of selling, general and administrative effectiveness and efficiencies, which we refer to as the Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan (the "SCAE Plan")., our plan to integrate and restructure the operations of our Private Brands business, improve SG&A effectiveness and efficiencies, and optimize our supply chain network, manufacturing assets, dry distribution centers, and mixing centers. In fiscal 2016, we announced plans to realize efficiency benefits by reducing SG&A expenses and enhancing trade spend processes and tools, which plans were included as part of the SCAE Plan. Although we announced on June 30, 2015 our intent to exitdivested the Private Brands business, a divestiture of our Private Brands operations may not occur in a timely manner or at all. We will continuewe have continued to implement portions of the SCAE Plan, including work relatedby working to optimizingoptimize our supply chain network, and pursue cost reductions through our selling, generalSG&A functions, enhance trade spend processes and administrative functionstools, and productivity improvements.improve productivity.
Although we remain unable to make good faith estimates relating to the entire SCAE Plan, we are reporting on actions initiated through the end of fiscal 2015,2018, including the estimated amounts or range of amounts for each major type of costs expected to be incurred, and the charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows. As of May 31, 2015,27, 2018, our Board of Directors has approved the incurrence of up to $394.0$900.9 million of expenses in connection with the SCAE Plan.Plan, including expenses allocated for the Private Brands and Lamb Weston operations. We have incurred or expect to incur approximately $267.3$471.6 million of charges ($177.3322.1 million of cash charges and $90.0$149.5 million of non-cash charges) for actions identified to date under the SCAE plan. In fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, wePlan related to our continuing operations. We recognized charges of $85.2$38.0 million, $63.6 million, and $83.7$281.8 million respectively, in relation to the SCAE Plan.Plan related to our continuing operations in fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. We expect to incur costs related to the SCAE Plan over a multi-year period.
During fiscal 2012, we started incurring costs in connection with actions taken to attain synergies when integrating businesses acquired prior to the third quarter of fiscal 2013. These costs, collectively referred to as "acquisition-related restructuring costs", include severance and other costs associated with consolidating facilities and administrative functions. We have recognized cumulative pre-tax expenses of $23.7 million ($15.8 million of which have resulted in cash outflows) related to the acquisition-related restructuring costs. In fiscal 2015, we recognized charges of $0.3 million. In fiscal 2014, we recognized charges of $9.4 million, primarily representing costs related to asset impairments on equipment. The acquisition-related restructuring costs are substantially complete.

19



At the time of its acquisition, Ralcorp had certain initiatives underway designed to optimize its manufacturing and distribution networks. We refer to these actions and the related costs as the "Ralcorp Pre-acquisition Restructuring Plans". These plans involved, among other things, the exit of certain manufacturing facilities. In connection with the Ralcorp Pre-acquisition Restructuring Plans, we have incurred $3.7 million of pre-tax charges ($1.9 million of which resulted in cash outflows). In fiscal 2014, we recognized charges of $2.4 million. At the end of fiscal 2014, the Ralcorp Pre-acquisition Restructuring Plans were substantially complete.

SEGMENT REVIEW

We reportreflect our results of operations in threefive reporting segments: Consumer Foods, Commercial Foods,Grocery & Snacks, Refrigerated & Frozen, Foodservice, International, and Private Brands.Commercial.
Consumer Foods
Grocery & Snacks
The Consumer FoodsGrocery & Snacks reporting segment principally includes branded, shelf stable food products sold in various retail channels primarily in North America. Ourthe United States.
Refrigerated & Frozen
The Refrigerated & Frozen reporting segment principally includes branded, temperature controlled food products are sold in a variety of categories (meals, entrees, condiments, sides, snacks, and desserts) in various retail channels across frozen, refrigerated,in the United States.
International
The International reporting segment principally includes branded food products, in various temperature states, sold in various retail and shelf-stable temperature classes.foodservice channels outside of the United States.
Foodservice
The Foodservice reporting segment includes branded and customized food products, including meals, entrees, sauces, and a variety of custom-manufactured culinary products that are packaged for sale to restaurants and other foodservice establishments primarily in the United States. 
Commercial Foods
The Commercial Foods reporting segment includesincluded commercially branded and private brandedlabel food and ingredients, which arewere sold primarily to commercial, restaurants,restaurant, foodservice, food manufacturing, and industrial customers. The segment's primary food items include: frozen potato and sweet potato items andincluded a variety of vegetable, spice, and frozen bakery and grain productsgoods, which arewere sold under brands such asLamb Weston® and Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings®.
Private Brands
The Private Brands reporting segment principally includes private brandSpicetec and customized food products which areJM Swank businesses were sold in various retail channels, primarily in North America. The products include a varietythe first quarter of categories including: bars, cereal, snacks, condiments, pasta, and retail bakery products. Subsequent to fiscal 2015, on June 30, 2015, we announced our plan to exit2017. These businesses comprise the Private Brandsentire Commercial segment following the presentation of Lamb Weston as discontinued operations.


Presentation of Derivative Gains (Losses) from Economic Hedges of Forecasted Cash Flows in Segment Results
Derivatives used to manage commodity price risk and foreign currency risk are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. We believe these derivatives provide economic hedges of certain forecasted transactions. As such, these derivatives are generally recognized at fair market value with realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in general corporate expenses. The gains and losses are subsequently recognized in the operating results of the reporting segments in the period in which the underlying transaction being economically hedged is included in earnings. In the event that management determines a particular derivative entered into as an economic hedge of a forecasted commodity purchase has ceased to function as an economic hedge, we cease recognizing further gains and losses on such derivatives in corporate expense and begin recognizing such gains and losses within segment operating results, immediately.
The following table presents the net derivative gains (losses) from economic hedges of forecasted commodity consumption and the foreign currency risk of certain forecasted transactions associated with continuing operations, under this methodology:
 Fiscal Years Ended
($ in millions)
May 31,
2015
 
May 25,
2014
Net derivative gains (losses) incurred$(108.5) $24.4
Less: Net derivative losses allocated to reporting segments(58.3) (12.4)
Net derivative gains (losses) recognized in general corporate expenses$(50.2) $36.8
Net derivative losses allocated to Consumer Foods$(41.9) $(5.9)
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Commercial Foods(4.7) 4.3
Net derivative losses allocated to Private Brands(11.7) (10.8)
Net derivative losses included in segment operating profit$(58.3) $(12.4)
 Fiscal Years Ended
($ in millions)May 27,
2018
 May 28,
2017
 May 29,
2016
Net derivative gains (losses) incurred$(0.9) $0.6
 $(7.4)
Less: Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to reporting segments(7.1) 5.7
 (23.8)
Net derivative gains (losses) recognized in general corporate expenses$6.2
 $(5.1) $16.4
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Grocery & Snacks$0.2
 $3.4
 $(14.4)
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Refrigerated & Frozen(0.3) 0.8
 (6.2)
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to International Foods(6.9) 1.6
 (0.5)
Net derivative losses allocated to Foodservice(0.1) 
 (1.0)
Net derivative losses allocated to Commercial
 (0.1) (1.7)
Net derivative gains (losses) included in segment operating profit$(7.1) $5.7
 $(23.8)

20



As of May 31, 2015,27, 2018, the cumulative amount of net derivative lossesgains from economic hedges that had been recognized in general corporate expenses and not yet allocated to reporting segments was $23.3 million. This amount reflected net losses$3.2 million, all of $23.7 millionwhich was incurred during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2015, as well as net gains of $0.4 million incurred prior to fiscal 2015.27, 2018. Based on our forecasts of the timing of recognition of the underlying hedged items, we expect to reclassify to segment operating results lossesgains of $23.5$2.5 million in fiscal 20162019 and gains of $0.2$0.7 million in fiscal 20172020 and thereafter.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2015, management determined that certain derivatives that had been previously entered into as an economic hedge of forecasted commodity purchases had ceased to function as economic hedges. We recognized $18.9 million, $5.2 million, and $1.4 million of net derivative losses during fiscal 2015 within the operating results of the Consumer Foods, Private Brands, and Commercial Foods segments, respectively, in connection with these derivatives. Management effectively exited these derivative positions in the third quarter of fiscal 2015.
Fiscal 20152018 compared to Fiscal 20142017
Net Sales
($ in millions)
Reporting Segment
Fiscal 2015 Net Sales Fiscal 2014 Net Sales 
% Inc
(Dec)
Consumer Foods$7,304.4
 $7,315.7
  %
Commercial Foods4,463.2
 4,332.2
 3 %
Private Brands4,064.8
 4,195.7
 (3)%
Total$15,832.4
 $15,843.6
  %
($ in millions)
Reporting Segment
Fiscal 2018 Net Sales Fiscal 2017 Net Sales 
% Inc
(Dec)
Grocery & Snacks$3,287.0
 $3,208.8
 2 %
Refrigerated & Frozen2,753.0
 2,652.7
 4 %
International843.5
 816.0
 3 %
Foodservice1,054.8
 1,078.3
 (2)%
Commercial
 71.1
 (100)%
Total$7,938.3
 $7,826.9
 1 %
Overall, our net sales were $15.83$7.94 billion in fiscal 2015, essentially2018, an increase of 1% compared to fiscal 2017.
Grocery & Snacks net sales for fiscal 2018 were $3.29 billion, an increase of $78.2 million, or 2%, compared to fiscal 2017. Results reflected a decrease in volumes of approximately 2% in fiscal 2018 compared to the prior-year period, excluding the impact of acquisitions. The decrease in sales volumes reflected a reduction in promotional intensity, planned discontinuation of certain lower-performing products, retailer inventory reductions, which were higher than anticipated, and deliberate actions to optimize distribution on certain lower-margin products, consistent with the Company's value over volume strategy. Price/


mix was flat compared to the prior-year period as favorable mix improvements from recent innovation and higher net pricing nearly offset continued investments in retailer marketing to drive brand saliency, enhanced distribution, and consumer trial. The acquisition of Angie's Artisan Treats, LLC contributed $68.1 million to Grocery & Snacks net sales during fiscal 2018. The Frontera acquisition contributed $8.6 million and the Thanasi acquisition contributed $66.5 million to Grocery & Snacks net sales during fiscal 2018 through the one-year anniversaries of the acquisitions. The Frontera and Thanasi acquisitions occurred in September 2016 and April 2017, respectively.
Refrigerated & Frozen net sales for fiscal 2018 were $2.75 billion, an increase of $100.3 million, or 4%, compared to fiscal 2017. Results for fiscal 2018 reflected a 3% increase in volume compared to fiscal 2017, excluding the impact of acquisitions. The increase in sales volumes was a result of brand renovation and innovation launches. Price/mix was flat compared to fiscal 2014.2017, as favorability in both net pricing and mix offset continued investment in retailer marketing to drive brand saliency, enhanced distribution, and consumer trial. The acquisition of the Sandwich Bros. of Wisconsin® business contributed $21.3 million to Refrigerated & Frozen's net sales during fiscal 2018. The Frontera acquisition, which occurred in September 2016, and subsequent innovation in the Frontera® brand contributed $4.4 million during fiscal 2018 through the one-year anniversary of the acquisition.
Consumer FoodsInternational net sales for fiscal 20152018 were $7.30 billion, a decrease of $11.3$843.5 million, compared to fiscal 2014. Results reflected a volume benefit of approximately 1% in fiscal 2015 due to the inclusion of an additional week of results, offset by 1% decrease due to the impact of foreign exchange rates. In addition, we increased prices in fiscal 2015 for some categories to cover commodity costs.
Sales of products associated with some of our most significant brands, including ACT II®, Chef Boyardee®, Hebrew National®, Hunt's®, Marie Callender's®, Odom's®, Pam®, Reddi-wip®, Ro*Tel®, and Slim Jim®, grew in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014. Significant brands whose products experienced sales declines in fiscal 2015 include Bertolli®, Blue Bonnet®, Healthy Choice®, Libby's®, Orville Redenbacher's®, Peter Pan®, Snack Pack®, Swiss Miss®, and Wesson®.
Commercial Foods net sales were $4.46 billion in fiscal 2015, an increase of $131.0 million, or 3%, compared to fiscal 2014. Results for fiscal 2015 reflected increased volumes in the Lamb Weston specialty potato products business and Foodservice businesses due to the inclusion of an additional week of results. Lamb Weston results also reflected good domestic performance, more than offsetting the negative impact of the West Coast labor dispute on international sales and challenges facing quick service restaurant customers.
Private Brands net sales for fiscal 2015 were $4.06 billion, a decrease of $130.9$27.5 million, or 3%, compared to fiscal 2014.2017. Results for fiscal 2018 reflected a 3% decrease in volume, a 3% increase due to foreign exchange rates, and a 3% increase in price/mix, in each case compared to fiscal 2017. The decreasesvolume decrease for fiscal 2018 was driven by strategic decisions to eliminate lower margin products and to reduce promotional intensity. The increase in Private Brandsprice/mix compared to the prior-year period was driven by improvements in pricing and trade productivity.
Foodservice net sales for fiscal 20152018 were $1.05 billion, a decrease of $23.5 million, or 2%, compared to fiscal 2017. Results for fiscal 2018 reflected weakan 11% decrease in volume, partially offset by a 9% increase in price/mix compared to fiscal 2017. The decrease in volumes resulting from an intense bidding environmentcompared to the prior-year period primarily reflected the impact of exiting a non-core business, the planned discontinuation of certain lower-performing businesses, and executional challenges, more than offsettingsoftness in certain categories. The increase in price/mix for fiscal 2018 reflected favorable product and customer mix, the benefitimpact of inflation-driven increases in pricing, and the execution of the inclusionsegment's value over volume strategy.
In the first quarter of an additional weekfiscal 2017, we divested our Spicetec and JM Swank businesses. These businesses comprise the entire Commercial segment following the presentation of resultsLamb Weston as discontinued operations. Accordingly, there were no net sales in the Commercial segment after the first quarter of fiscal 2017. These businesses had net sales of $71.1 million in fiscal 2015.2017 prior to the completion of the divestitures.
Selling, General and Administrative ("SG&A")&A Expenses (Includes general corporate expenses)
SG&A expenses totaled $3.47$1.32 billion for fiscal 2015, an increase2018, a decrease of $700.9$99.1 million compared to fiscal 2014. We estimate that the inclusion of an extra week in the fiscal 2015 results increased SG&A expenses by approximately $30 million.
2017. SG&A expenses for fiscal 20152018 reflected the following:
Items impacting comparability of earnings
charges totaling $151.0 million related to certain litigation matters,
a charge of $34.9 million related to the early termination of an unfavorable lease contract,
expenses of $30.2 million in connection with our SCAE Plan,
expenses of $15.1 million associated with costs incurred for acquisitions and planned divestitures,
charges of $1.59 billion$5.4 million related to pension plan lump-sum settlements and a remeasurement of our salaried and non-qualified pension plan liability, and
charges totaling $4.8 million related to the impairment of goodwill, other intangibles, and fixed assets impacting reporting units within our Private Brands segment,intangible assets.
Other changes in expenses compared to fiscal 2017
a decrease in advertising and promotion spendingexpense of $69.8$49.7 million,
a decrease in pension and postretirement expense of $19.4 million (excluding the impacts of settlements and remeasurements),


a decrease in transaction services agreement income of $18.3 million,
a decrease in incentive compensation expense of $14.6 million,
a decrease in stock-based compensation expense of $10.4 million,
a decrease in contract services of $9.4 million,
a decrease in charitable contributions of $6.7,
an increase in salaries expense of $19.4 million, and
an increase in self-insured workers' compensation and wagesproduct liability expense of $57.3$7.0 million.
SG&A expenses for fiscal 2017 included the following items impacting the comparability of earnings:
charges totaling $237.1 million related to the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, primarily in the International segment,
gains totaling $197.4 million, from the divestiture of the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses,
charges totaling $93.3 million related to the early retirement of debt,
a charge of $67.1 million related to the impairment of the Chef Boyardee® brand intangible,
expenses of $46.4 million in connection with our efficiency and effectiveness initiatives,SCAE Plan,

charges of $30.9 million related to the planned divestiture of our Wesson® oil business, including an impairment charge of $27.6 million related to the production assets of the business that were not initially included in the assets held for sale,
21



expensesan expense of $53.3$13.8 million in connection with our restructuring plans,
an increasea salaried pension plan lump sum settlement we completed in incentive compensation expense of $25.3 million,
charges of $24.6 million related to early extinguishment of debt as a result of the payoff of our term loan facilityfiscal 2017, and the repurchase of certain senior notes,
expenses of $16.3 million in support of our integration of the former Ralcorp business,
an increase in stock compensation expenses of $12.2 million,
a benefit of $7.0 million related to the reduction of the legal accrual for pending matters associated with the 2007 peanut butter recall,
a charge of $6.9 million reflecting the year-end write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of our pension liability,
charges of $5.1 million related to intangible asset impairments in our Consumer Foods and Commercial Foods segments, and
a charge of $3.7$5.7 million in connection with a legal matter.
SG&A expenses for fiscal 2014 included:
charges of $605.4 million for the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets within our Private Brands segment,
expenses of $76.6 million in connection with our restructuring plans,
charges of $75.7 million related to intangible asset impairments, primarily the Chef Boyardee brand,
expenses of $53.0 million in support of our integration of the former Ralcorp business,
a charge of $16.5 million in connection with the impairment of a small production facility,
a benefit of $10.2 million related legal matters associated with the 2007 peanut butter recall, including a reduction of the legal accrual for matters associated with the recall and the reimbursement of settlement and defense costs from an insurer,
a charge of $8.9 million in connection with the impairment of certain assets received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier,
transaction-related costs of $6.4 million, and
a benefit of $5.1 million in connection with the sale of land received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier.
Segment Operating Profit (Loss) (Earnings (loss) before general corporate expenses, interest expense, net, income taxes, and equity method investment earnings)
($ in millions)
Reporting Segment
Fiscal 2015 Operating Profit (Loss) Fiscal 2014 Operating Profit (Loss) 
% Inc
(Dec)
Consumer Foods$1,069.7
 $892.0
 20%
Commercial Foods568.5
 537.7
 6%
Private Brands(1,456.7) (373.4) 290%
($ in millions)
Reporting Segment
Fiscal 2018 Operating Profit Fiscal 2017 Operating Profit 
% Inc
(Dec)
Grocery & Snacks$724.8
 $653.7
 11 %
Refrigerated & Frozen479.4
 445.8
 8 %
International86.5
 (168.9) N/A
Foodservice121.8
 105.1
 16 %
Commercial
 202.6
 (100)%
Consumer FoodsGrocery & Snacks operating profit for fiscal 20152018 was $1.07 billion,$724.8 million, an increase of $177.7$71.1 million,, or 20%11%, compared to fiscal 2014.2017. Gross profits were $20.2 million lower in Consumer Foods were flatfiscal 2018 than in fiscal 2017. The lower gross profit was driven by investments with retailers (i.e., trade spending reflected as a reduction of net sales), as well as higher input costs and transportation expenses, partially offset by supply chain realized productivity. The Frontera acquisition, Thanasi acquisition, and the acquisition of Angie's Artisan Treats, LLC, which occurred in September 2016, April 2017, and October 2017, respectively, contributed $47.4 million to Grocery & Snacks gross profit during fiscal 2018 through the one-year anniversaries of the acquisitions (if reached). Advertising and promotion expenses for fiscal 2018 decreased by $19.5 million compared to fiscal 2017. Operating profit of the Grocery & Snacks segment was impacted by charges totaling $4.0 million in fiscal 2018 for the impairment of our 2014HK Anderson®, driven by the impact of comparable net sales, discussed above, favorable product mixRed Fork®, and improved plant productivity, offset by $18.9 million of net derivative losses in

22



connection with certain derivatives that ceased to function as economic hedges and higher commodity costs. Operating profit was favorably impacted by the decrease in advertising and promotion expenses of $63.4 million and lower salaries expense. The decrease in advertising expense reflected a continually increasing focus on prioritization, efficiency, and return on investment. Consumer Foods operating profit in fiscal 2015 included a charge of $4.8 million related to impairment of the PoppycockSalpica® brand intangible asset. Operating profit for the Consumer Foods segment for fiscal 2015 also includes $31.7 million of estimated negative impact from changes in foreign exchange rates. Charges totaling $35.4 million related to our restructuring plans also impacted Consumer Foods results in fiscal 2015, compared to $25.6assets and $68.3 million in fiscal 2014. In fiscal 2014, Consumer Foods operating profit included charges of $72.5 million related to2017 primarily for the impairment of intangible assets, principally theour Chef Boyardee®brand. Charges brand asset. Grocery & Snacks also incurred $11.4 million of $1.8 million for transaction-related expenses also impactedin fiscal 2014 Consumer Foods operating profit.
Operating profit for the Commercial Foods segment was $568.52018 related to acquisitions and divestitures, charges of $31.4 million in fiscal 2015,2017 related to the pending divestiture of the


Wesson® oil business, and charges of $14.1 million and $25.3 million in connection with our restructuring plans in fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Refrigerated & Frozen operating profit for fiscal 2018 was $479.4 million, an increase of $30.8$33.6 million, or 6%8%, compared to fiscal 2014.2017. Gross profits were $3.6 million lower in fiscal 2018 than in fiscal 2017, driven by continuing increases in input costs and transportation inflation as well as investments to drive distribution, enhanced shelf presence, and trial, partially offset by increased sales volumes and supply chain realized productivity. The acquisition of the Sandwich Bros. of Wisconsin® business contributed $4.6 million to gross profit in the Commercial Foods segment were flatduring fiscal 2018. Advertising and promotion expenses for fiscal 2018 decreased by $23.4 million compared to fiscal 2014. Commercial Foods recognized $1.42017. Operating profit of the Refrigerated & Frozen segment was impacted by charges totaling approximately $7.7 million in fiscal 2017 related to a product recall, as well as charges of net derivative losses$0.1 million and $6.2 million in connection with certain derivatives that ceased to function as economic hedges. The increases in operating profits reflected good domestic performance (discussed above), a better quality raw potato crop, and good operating efficiencies; collectively, these more than offset lower profits from international sales. International sales and profits were weak, resulting from challenges facing quick-serve restaurant customers in key Asian markets and the impact of the slowdown from the West Coast port labor dispute. The West Coast port labor dispute was resolved toward the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2015. Commercial Foods operating profit also included charges of $3.2 million and $4.8 millionour restructuring plans in fiscal 20152018 and 2014, respectively, related to the execution of our restructuring plans. Commercial Foods2017, respectively.
International operating profit for fiscal 2014 also included a charge2018 was $86.5 million, compared to an operating loss of $16.5$168.9 million for fiscal 2017. The operating loss in connection with the impairment of a small production facility, as well as a charge of $8.9fiscal 2017 includes charges totaling $235.9 million for the impairment of goodwill and an intangible brand asset in our Canadian and Mexican operations. Gross profits were $18.6 million higher in fiscal 2018 than in fiscal 2017, as a result of improved price/mix, the favorable impact of foreign exchange, and the planned discontinuations of certain nonoperating assetslower-performing products. Operating profit of the International segment was impacted by charges of $1.5 million and a $5.1$0.9 million gain from the sale of land, both related to assets received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier.our restructuring plans, in fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Private BrandsFoodservice operating lossprofit for fiscal 2015 and 20142018 was $1.46 billion and $373.4$121.8 million, respectively.an increase of $16.7 million, or 16%, compared to fiscal 2017. Gross profits were $114.2$13.9 million lowerhigher in fiscal 20152018 than in fiscal 2014. Gross profits2017, primarily reflecting the impact of inflation-driven increases in pricing and supply chain realized productivity, partially offset by lower sales volumes and increased input costs. Operating profit of the Foodservice segment was impacted by charges of $1.8 million in fiscal 2015 included $5.2 million of net derivative losses2017 in connection with certain derivatives that ceased to function as economic hedges. In fiscal 2015 and 2014, we recognized charges of $1.59 billion and $605.4 million, respectively, in connection with the impairment of goodwill, other intangible assets, and fixed assets within the Private Brands segment. Additional decreases were driven by the impact of lower net sales, discussed above, and higher commodity costs (particularly for durum wheat and tree nuts). Private Brandsour restructuring plans.
Commercial operating profit was $202.6 million in fiscal 2015 and 2014 also included $36.1 million and $35.9 million, respectively, of charges related to the execution of our restructuring plans.2017. The Company is working to improve executionsold the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses in its Private Brandsthe first quarter of fiscal 2017, recognizing pre-tax gains totaling $197.4 million. The Spicetec and JM Swank businesses comprise the entire Commercial segment including increasing speedfollowing the presentation of responsiveness to customers and commercialization of new products, improving fill rates and on-time deliveries, and better commodity cost management. Subsequent to fiscal 2015, on June 30, 2015, we announced our plan to exitLamb Weston as discontinued operations. There are no further operations in the Private Brands operations.Commercial segment.
Interest Expense, Net
In fiscal 2015,2018, net interest expense was $331.9$158.7 million,, a decrease of $47.5$36.8 million,, or 13%19%, from fiscal 2014.2017. The decrease reflects the repayment of debt and other debt financing actions. Interest expense$550.0 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding senior notes in fiscal 2015 and 2014 reflected a net benefit of $8.0 million and $12.1 million, respectively, primarily resulting from interest rate swaps used to effectively convert the interest rates of certain outstanding debt instruments from fixed rate to floating rate.
Income Taxes
Our income tax expense was $234.0 million and $220.1 million in fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively. Income tax expense for fiscal 2015 reflected an impairment of goodwill that is largely non-deductible for tax purposes. The implementation of new positions we are taking on tax credits that apply to prior year tax returns also resulted in an income tax benefit of $10.9 million in fiscal 2015. Income tax expense for fiscal 2014 also reflected an impairment of goodwill that is largely non-deductible for tax purposes. The fiscal 2014 effective tax rate also included a change in estimate related to tax methods used for certain international sales, favorable tax adjustments resulting from changes in legal structure and state tax filing positions, resolution of foreign tax matters that were previously reserved, the effect of a law change in Mexico requiring deconsolidation for tax reporting purposes, and the resolution of certain income tax matters related to dispositions of foreign operations in prior years.
We expect our effective tax rate in fiscal 2016, exclusive of any unusual transactions or tax events, to be approximately 33%-34%.

23



Equity Method Investment Earnings
We include our share of the earnings of certain affiliates based on our economic ownership interest in the affiliates. Significant affiliates include the Ardent Mills joint venture and affiliates that produce and market potato products for retail and foodservice customers. Our share of earnings from our equity method investments was $122.1 million ($119.1 million in the Commercial Foods segment and $3.0 million in the Consumer Foods segment) and $32.5 million ($29.7 million in the Commercial Foods segment and $2.8 million in the Consumer Foods segment) in fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively. The increase in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014 reflects the earnings from the Ardent Mills joint venture as well as higher profits for an international potato joint venture. The earnings from the Ardent Mills joint venture reflect results for 11 months of operations, as we recognize earnings on a one-month lag, due to differences in fiscal year periods. In fiscal 2014, earnings also reflected a $3.4 million charge reflecting the year-end write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of the pension liability for an international potato venture.

Results of Discontinued Operations
Our discontinued operations generated after-tax income of $366.6 million and $141.4 million in fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively. The results of discontinued operations for fiscal 2015 include a pre-tax gain of $625.6 million ($379.6 million after-tax) recognized on the formation of the Ardent Mills joint venture. The results for fiscal 2014 reflect a pre-tax gain of $90.0 million ($55.7 million after-tax) related to the disposition of three flour milling facilities as part of the Ardent Mills formation.
In fiscal 2014, we also completed the sale of a small snack business, Medallion Foods, for $32.0 million in cash. We recognized an after-tax loss of $3.5 million on the sale of this business in fiscal 2014. In fiscal 2014, we recognized an impairment charge related to allocated amounts of goodwill and intangible assets, totaling $15.2 million after-tax, in anticipation of this divestiture. We also completed the sale of the assets of the Lightlife® business for $54.7 million in cash. We recognized an after-tax gain of $19.8 million on the sale of this business in fiscal 2014.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Diluted loss per share in fiscal 2015 was $0.60, including a loss of $1.46 per diluted share from continuing operations and earnings of $0.86 per diluted share from discontinued operations. Diluted earnings per share in fiscal 2014 were $0.70, including $0.37 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.33 per diluted share from discontinued operations. See “Items Impacting Comparability” above as several significant items affected the comparability of year-over-year results of operations.
Fiscal 2014 compared to Fiscal 2013
Net Sales
($ in millions)
Reporting Segment
Fiscal 2014 Net Sales Fiscal 2013 Net Sales 
% Inc
(Dec)
Consumer Foods7,315.7
 7,551.4
 (3)%
Commercial Foods4,332.2
 4,109.7
 5 %
Private Brands4,195.7
 1,808.2
 132 %
Total$15,843.6
 $13,469.3
 18 %
Overall, our net sales increased $2.37 billion to $15.84 billion in fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013, primarily related to the acquisition of Ralcorp.
Consumer Foods net sales for fiscal 2014 were $7.32 billion, a decrease of $235.7 million, or 3%, compared to fiscal 2013. Results reflected a 3% decrease in volume performance and a 1% decrease due to the impact of foreign exchange rates, partially offset by a 1% increase in price/mix. Volume performance from our base businesses for fiscal 2014 was impacted negatively by competitor promotional activity. Significant slotting and promotion investments related to new product launches, particularly in the first quarter, also weighed heavily on net sales in fiscal 2014. In addition, certain shipments planned for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 were shifted to the first quarter of fiscal 2015 as a result2017, $473.0 million aggregate principal amount of change in timing of retailer promotions and this negatively impacted volume performance.

24



Sales of products associated with some of our most significant brands, including Bertolli®, Hunt's®, Odom's®, Libby's®, Reddi-wip®, Ro*Tel®, Slim Jim®, and Swiss Miss® grew in fiscal 2014, as compared to fiscal 2013. Significant brands whose products experienced sales declines in fiscal 2014 include ACT II®, Banquet®, Chef Boyardee®, Healthy Choice®, Marie Callender's®, Orville Redenbacher's®, Snack Pack®, and Wesson®. A significant portion of the overall volume decline was driven by Healthy Choice®, Orville Redenbacher’s®, and Chef Boyardee® (which collectively have annual sales in excess of $1 billion).
Commercial Foods net sales were $4.33 billion in fiscal 2014, an increase of $222.5 million, or 5%, compared to fiscal 2013. Results for fiscal 2014 reflected a 5% benefit from the acquisition of the frozen bakery business of Ralcorp in January 2013. Results for fiscal 2014 also reflected increased volume of 2%outstanding senior notes in the segment's Lamb Weston specialty potato products business, driven by increased sales to international customers, partially offset by lower price/mix. Salesthird quarter of fiscal 2017, $119.6 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding senior notes in the third quarter of fiscal 2018, $70.0 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding senior notes in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 to international customers were favorably impacted by increased promotional activity and accelerated orders due to concerns about the effect of a potential external labor dispute on West coast exports. Sales volume in the Foodservice business decreased in fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013 due to industry trends.
Private Brands net sales for fiscal 2014 were $4.20 billion. The increase of $2.39 billion represented a full year of ownership of the legacy Ralcorp business in fiscal 2014 compared to four months in fiscal 2013.
Selling, General and Administrative ("SG&A") Expenses (Includes general corporate expenses)
SG&A expenses totaled $2.77 billion for fiscal 2014, an increase of $705.3 million compared to fiscal 2013. The increase in overall SG&A occurred as a result of the additional eight months of SG&A expenses for the Ralcorp business2018, as well as the following changes from our base business:
a decrease in incentive compensation expenseexchange of $74.5 million,
charges$1.44 billion of $75.7 million related to intangible asset impairments, primarily the Chef Boyardee brand,
a decrease in advertising and promotion expenses of $49.4 million,
an increase in salaries and wages of $63.7 million,
a charge of $16.5 milliondebt in connection with the impairmentSpinoff of a small production facility,
a benefitLamb Weston during the second quarter of $10.2 million related to legal matters associated with the 2007 peanut butter recall, including a reduction of the legal accrual for matters associated with the recall, and the reimbursement of settlement and defense costs from an insurer,
a charge of $8.9 million in connection with the impairment of certain assets received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier, and
a benefit of $5.1 million in connection with the sale of land received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier.
SG&A expenses for fiscal 2014 (including legacy Ralcorp) also included:
charges of $605.4 million for the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets within our Private Brands segment,
expenses of $76.6 million in connection with our restructuring plans,
$53.0 million in support of our integration of the former Ralcorp business, and
transaction-related costs of $6.4 million.
SG&A expenses from our base business in fiscal 2013 included:
a benefit of $25.0 million related to the favorable settlement of an insurance matter associated with the 2007 peanut butter recall,

25



a charge of $10.2 million in connection with the impairment of certain assets received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier,
a charge of $7.5 million in connection with legal matters associated with the 2007 peanut butter recall,
charges of $6.2 million related to early extinguishment of debt as a result of early payments on our Term Loan Facility,
a charge of $5.7 million reflecting the year-end write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of our pension liability,
charges of $4.5 million related to environmental remediation matters related to Beatrice Company, and
charges of $3.0 million in connection with an accident at our Garner plant.
SG&A expenses for fiscal 2013 (including legacy Ralcorp) also included:
transaction-related costs of $108.2 million, principally relating to the acquisition of Ralcorp,
expenses of $31.9 million in connection with our restructuring plans, and
expenses of $21.6 million in support of our integration of the former Ralcorp business.
Operating Profit (Loss) (Earnings (loss) before general corporate expenses, interest expense, net, income taxes, and equity method investment earnings)
($ in millions)
Reporting Segment
Fiscal 2014 Operating Profit (Loss) Fiscal 2013 Operating Profit 
% Inc
(Dec)
Consumer Foods$892.0
 $984.4
 (9)%
Commercial Foods537.7
 585.5
 (8)%
Private Brands(373.4) 125.4
 N/A
Consumer Foods operating profit for fiscal 20142017. This was $892.0 million, a decrease of $92.4 million, or 9%, compared to fiscal 2013. Gross profits in Consumer Foods were $128.2 million lower in fiscal 2014 than in fiscal 2013, driven by the impact of lower net sales, discussed above, and moderate inflation in product costs. These decreases were partially offset by reduced management incentive compensation and decreased advertising and consumer promotion costs of $50.6 million, reflecting heavy investment in fiscal 2013, rebalancing spending to strengthen promotional support and a focus on marketing effectiveness. Other items that significantly impacted Consumer Foods operating profit in fiscal 2014 included charges of $72.5 million related to impairment of intangibles assets, principally the Chef Boyardee brand, and charges totaling $25.6 million in connection with our restructuring plans. Items that significantly impacted Consumer Foods operating profit in fiscal 2013 included charges totaling $12.1 million in connection with our restructuring plans and charges of $10.9 million of transaction-related costs.
Operating profit for the Commercial Foods segment was $537.7 million in fiscal 2014, a decrease of $47.8 million, or 8%, compared to fiscal 2013. Gross profits in the Commercial Foods segment were $35.6 million lower in fiscal 2014 than in fiscal 2013. Decreases in operating profit for fiscal 2014 were driven by lower gross profit in the Lamb Weston specialty potato operations related to the change in mix of sales to international and retail customers due to the impact of a major foodservice customer not renewing a sizable amount of potato business at the end of fiscal 2013, moderate inflation in key inputs, and poor quality raw potatoes affecting plant recovery and throughputs. The significant decreases in Lamb Weston results were offset by significant reductions in incentive compensation expenses in fiscal 2014. Commercial Foods operating profit for fiscal 2014 also included a charge of $16.5 million in connection with the impairment of a small production facility, as well as a charge of $8.9 million for the impairment of certain nonoperating assets and a $5.1 million gain from the sale of land, both related to assets received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier. In addition, there were $4.8 million of charges in connection with our restructuring plans. Results for fiscal 2013 reflected a $10.2 million charge to reduce the carrying value of collateral received in connection with the bankruptcy of the onion products supplier to its estimated fair value based upon updated appraisals. Commercial Foods operating profit also included $6.1 million of charges in fiscal

26



2013 related to the execution of our restructuring plans. Included in the results of the Commercial Foods operating profit in fiscal 2013 was $3.1 million of incremental cost of goods sold due to the fair value adjustment to inventory resulting from acquisition accounting.
Private Brands segment operating loss for fiscal 2014 was $373.4 million, compared to an operating profit for fiscal 2013 of $125.4 million. The majority of our Private Brands segment is comprised of the former Ralcorp business. The increase in net sales, discussed above, reflects the impact of the Ralcorp acquisition. Operating profits have been below expectations due to sales force, supply chain, and pricing actions, as well as cost challenges associated with integration and business transition. In fiscal 2014, we recognized charges of $605.4 million in connection with the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets within the Private Brands segment. Also included in the operating loss for fiscal 2014 were $35.9 million of charges in connection with our restructuring plans. Included in the results of the Private Brands operating profit in fiscal 2013 was $13.6 million of incremental cost of goods sold due to the fair value adjustment to inventory resulting from acquisition accounting.
Interest Expense, Net
In fiscal 2014, net interest expense was $379.4 million, an increase of $103.2 million, or 37%, from fiscal 2013. The increase reflects the issuance of $3.975 billion$500.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior debt, outstanding borrowingsfloating rate notes due 2020 during the second quarter of $900fiscal 2018 and the borrowing of $300.0 million under a Term Loan Facility, and $716.0 millionour term loan agreement during the fourth quarter of seniorfiscal 2018. For more information about the debt that was exchanged in January 2013 in financing the Ralcorp acquisition, in additionexchange, see Note 4 "Long-Term Debt" to the issuance of $750.0 million of senior notesconsolidated financial statements contained in September 2012. Interest expense in fiscal 2014 and 2013 reflected a net benefit of $12.1 million and $8.6 million, respectively, primarily resulting from interest rate swaps used to effectively convert the interest rates of certain outstanding debt instruments from fixed rate to floating rate.this report.
Income Taxes
Our income tax expense was $220.1$174.6 million and $361.9$254.7 million in fiscal 20142018 and 2013,2017, respectively. The effective tax rate (calculated as the ratio of income tax expense to pre-tax income from continuing operations, inclusive of equity method investment earnings) was 56%approximately 18% and 32% for fiscal 20142018 and 34%2017, respectively.
The Tax Act was enacted into law on December 22, 2017. The changes to U.S. tax law include, but are not limited to:
reducing the federal statutory income tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018;
eliminating the deduction for domestic manufacturing activities, which impacts us beginning in fiscal 2013. 2019;
requiring companies to pay a one-time transition tax on certain unrepatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries;
repealing the exception for deductibility of performance-based compensation to covered employees, along with expanding the number of covered employees;
allowing immediate expensing of machinery and equipment contracted for purchase after September 27, 2017; and


changing taxation of multinational companies, including a new minimum tax on Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income, a new Base Erosion Anti-Abuse Tax, and a new U.S. corporate deduction for Foreign-Derived Intangible Income, all of which are effective for us beginning in 2019.
As a result of our fiscal year end, the lower U.S. statutory federal income tax rate resulted in a blended U.S. federal statutory rate of 29.3% for the fiscal year ended May 27, 2018. The U.S. federal statutory rate is expected to be 21% for fiscal years beginning after May 27, 2018.
The effective tax rate forin fiscal 20142018 reflects the incurrencefollowing:
the impact of U.S. tax reform, as noted above,
an adjustment of valuation allowance associated with the termination of the agreement for the proposed sale of our Wesson® oil business,
an indirect cost of the pension contribution made on February 26, 2018,
additional expense related to the settlement of an impairmentaudit of intangible assets, $529.2 million of which was non-deductible goodwill, as well as the benefit of normal, recurring, income tax credits and deductions, some of which expired on December 31, 2013. During fiscal 2015, these income tax credits and deductions were extended through December 31, 2014. Accordingly, the related income tax benefit was recognized in fiscal 2015. The fiscal 2014 effective tax rate also included a change in estimate related to tax methods used for certain international sales, favorable tax adjustments resulting from changes in legal structure and state tax filing positions, resolution of foreign tax matters that were previously reserved, the effectimpact of a law change in Mexico, requiring deconsolidation for tax reporting purposes, and the resolution of certain
an income tax mattersbenefit allowed upon the vesting/exercise of employee stock compensation awards by our employees, beyond that which is attributable to the original fair value of the awards upon the date of grant, and
additional expense related to dispositions ofundistributed foreign operations in prior years. earnings for which the indefinite reinvestment assertion is no longer made.
The effective tax rate forin fiscal 20132017 reflects the incurrence of variousfollowing:
additional tax expense associated with non-deductible transaction-related expenses, as well as a reduced domestic manufacturing deduction benefit,goodwill sold in connection with the acquisitiondivestitures of Ralcorp. The fiscal 2013the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses,
additional tax expense associated with non-deductible goodwill in our Mexican and Canadian businesses, for which an impairment charge was recognized,
an income tax benefit for the adjustment of a valuation allowance associated with the planned divestiture of the Wesson® oil business,
an income tax benefit for excess tax benefits allowed upon the vesting/exercise of employee stock compensation awards by our employees, beyond that which is attributable to the original fair value of the awards upon the date of grant, and
an income tax benefit associated with a tax planning strategy that allowed us to utilize certain state tax attributes and certain foreign incentives.
We expect our effective tax rate also included favorablein fiscal 2019, exclusive of any unusual transactions or tax adjustments resulting from the implementation of the 2012 American Taxpayer Relief Act during fiscal 2013.events, to be approximately 23%-24%.
Equity Method Investment Earnings
We include our share of the earnings of certain affiliates based on our economic ownership interest in the affiliates. Significant affiliates produce and market potato products for retail and foodservice customers.Our most significant affiliate is the Ardent Mills joint venture. Our share of earnings from our equity method investmentsinvestment earnings were $97.3 million and $71.2 million for fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively. A benefit of $4.3 million was $32.5included in the earnings of fiscal 2018 in connection with a gain on the substantial liquidation of an international joint venture. In addition, Ardent Mills earnings were higher than they were in the prior-year periods due to more favorable market conditions and continued improvement in operating effectiveness.


Results of Discontinued Operations
Our discontinued operations generated after-tax income of $14.3 million ($29.7and $102.0 million in fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively. During fiscal 2018, a $14.5 million income tax benefit was recorded due to an adjustment of the estimated deductibility of the costs incurred associated with effecting the Spinoff of Lamb Weston. The prior-year period results reflected the operations of Lamb Weston through the date of its Spinoff in November 2016. We incurred significant costs associated with effecting the Spinoff of Lamb Weston. These costs are included in results of discontinued operations.
Earnings Per Share
Diluted earnings per share in fiscal 2018 were $1.98, including earnings of $1.95 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.03 per diluted share from discontinued operations. Diluted earnings per share in fiscal 2017 were $1.46, including earnings of $1.25 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.21 per diluted share from discontinued operations. See "Items Impacting Comparability" above as several significant items affected the comparability of year-over-year results of operations.
Fiscal 2017 compared to Fiscal 2016
Net Sales
($ in millions)
Reporting Segment
Fiscal 2017 Net Sales Fiscal 2016 Net Sales 
% Inc
(Dec)
Grocery & Snacks$3,208.8
 $3,377.1
 (5)%
Refrigerated & Frozen2,652.7
 2,867.8
 (8)%
International816.0
 846.6
 (4)%
Foodservice1,078.3
 1,104.5
 (2)%
Commercial71.1
 468.1
 (85)%
Total$7,826.9
 $8,664.1
 (10)%
Overall, our net sales were $7.83 billion in fiscal 2017, a decrease of 10% compared to fiscal 2016.
Grocery & Snacks net sales for fiscal 2017 were $3.21 billion, a decrease of $168.3 million, or 5%, compared to fiscal 2016. Results reflected a decrease in volumes of approximately 5% in fiscal 2017 compared to the prior-year period. The decrease in sales volumes was the result of reduced trade promotions and the planned exit of certain lower-performing products. Price/mix was flat as the continued progress in pricing and trade productivity was fully offset by unfavorable sales mix. The reduced trade promotions and selective base price increases are actions that are intended to build a higher quality revenue base. The Frontera acquisition and the Thanasi acquisition collectively contributed $36.5 million, or 1%, to segment net sales during fiscal 2017.
Refrigerated & Frozen net sales for fiscal 2017 were $2.65 billion, a decrease of $215.1 million, or 8%, compared to fiscal 2016. Results for fiscal 2017 reflected a 9% decrease in volume and a 1% increase in price/mix compared to fiscal 2016. The decrease in sales volumes and improvements in price/mix reflected reduced trade promotions and selective base price increases, together with stock-keeping unit rationalization, which actions were intended to build a higher quality revenue base. Net sales growth was also negatively affected by a transitory increase in the volume of Egg Beaters® in fiscal 2016 as the Company's egg supply was not negatively impacted by the avian influenza outbreak in fiscal 2015.
International net sales for fiscal 2017 were $816.0 million, a decrease of $30.6 million, or 4%, compared to fiscal 2016. Results for fiscal 2017 reflected a 3% decrease in volume, a 3% decrease due to foreign exchange rates, and a 2% increase in price/mix compared to fiscal 2016. The volume decrease for fiscal 2017 was driven by significant shipments in early fiscal 2016 due to recovery from the West Coast port disruptions during fiscal 2015, aggressive pricing actions, reduced trade promotions, and the planned discontinuation of certain lower-margin products.
Foodservice net sales for fiscal 2017 were $1.08 billion, a decrease of $26.2 million, or 2%, compared to fiscal 2016. Results for fiscal 2017 reflected a 4% decrease in volume offset by a 2% increase in price/mix compared to fiscal 2016. The decrease in volumes primarily reflected the impact of exiting a non-core business.


In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we divested our Spicetec and JM Swank businesses. These businesses comprise the entire Commercial segment following the presentation of Lamb Weston as discontinued operations. Accordingly, there were no net sales in the Commercial Foods segment and $2.8after the first quarter of fiscal 2017. These businesses had net sales of $71.1 million in fiscal 2017 prior to the Consumer Foods segment) and $37.5 million ($35.7 millioncompletion of the divestitures. Net sales in the Commercial Foods segment and $1.8were $468.1 million in fiscal 2016.
SG&A Expenses (Includes general corporate expenses)
SG&A expenses totaled $1.42 billion for fiscal 2017, a decrease of $607.5 million compared to fiscal 2016. SG&A expenses for fiscal 2017 reflected the Consumer Foods segment)following:
Items impacting comparability of earnings
charges totaling $237.1 million related to the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, primarily in the International segment,
gains totaling $197.4 million from the divestiture of the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses,
a charge of $67.1 million related to the impairment of the Chef Boyardee® brand intangible,
charges totaling $93.3 million related to the early retirement of debt,
expenses of $46.4 million in connection with our SCAE Plan,
charges of $30.9 million related to the planned divestiture of our Wesson® oil business, including an impairment charge of $27.6 million related to the production assets of the business that initially were not included in the assets held for sale,
an expense of $13.8 million in connection with a salaried pension plan lump sum settlement we completed in fiscal 20142017, and 2013, respectively. In
a benefit of $5.7 million in connection with a legal matter.
Other changes in expenses compared to fiscal 2014, earnings also reflected 2016
a $3.4decrease in salaries expenses of $104.3 million,
a decrease in incentive compensation expense of $38.3 million,
a decrease in pension and postretirement expense of $19.8 million (excluding items impacting the comparability of earnings),
a decrease in advertising and promotion spending of $18.9 million,
a decrease in broker commission expense of $18.3 million,
an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $15.2 million,
an increase in charitable contributions of $6.3 million, and
a decrease in self-insured healthcare expenses of $5.7 million.
SG&A expenses for fiscal 2016 included the following items impacting the comparability of earnings:
a charge of $348.5 million reflecting the year-end write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of theour pension liability,
expenses totaling $232.8 million in connection with our SCAE Plan,
a charge of $50.1 million related to the impairment of the Chef Boyardee® brand intangible,
charges of $23.9 million related to the repurchase of certain senior notes, and


a charge of $5.0 million in connection with a legal matter.
Operating Profit (Earnings before general corporate expenses, interest expense, net, income taxes, and equity method investment earnings)
($ in millions)
Reporting Segment
Fiscal 2017 Operating Profit Fiscal 2016 Operating Profit 
% Inc
(Dec)
Grocery & Snacks$653.7
 $592.9
 10%
Refrigerated & Frozen445.8
 420.4
 6%
International(168.9) 66.7
 N/A
Foodservice105.1
 97.7
 8%
Commercial202.6
 45.4
 346%
Grocery & Snacks operating profit for fiscal 2017 was $653.7 million, an international potatoincrease of $60.8 million, or 10%, compared to fiscal 2016. Gross profits were $36.5 million higher in fiscal 2017 than in fiscal 2016. The higher gross profit was driven by reduced trade promotions, improved plant productivity, and lower commodity input costs, partially offset by lower sales volumes, due in part to pricing actions on certain products. SG&A expenses decreased by $24.3 million in fiscal 2017, as compared to fiscal 2016, largely as a result of cost reductions achieved through our restructuring plans, as well as a $5.6 million reduction in advertising and promotion expenses. Operating profit of the Grocery & Snacks segment was impacted by charges totaling $68.3 million and $50.1 million, primarily for the impairment of our Chef Boyardee® brand asset in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively, $31.4 million in charges in fiscal 2017 related to the pending divestiture of the Wesson® oil business, and charges of $25.3 million and $51.8 million in connection with our restructuring plans in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Refrigerated & Frozen operating profit for fiscal 2017 was $445.8 million, an increase of $25.4 million, or 6%, compared to fiscal 2016. Gross profits were $24.7 million lower in fiscal 2017 than in fiscal 2016, driven by decreased sales volumes primarily associated with the transitory increase in the volume of Egg Beaters® in fiscal 2016, discussed above, partially offset by the impact of lower commodity input costs, increased net pricing primarily as a result of reduced trade promotions, and improved plant productivity. SG&A expenses decreased by $50.1 million in fiscal 2017, as compared to fiscal 2016, largely as a result of cost reductions achieved through our restructuring plans, as well as a $8.9 million reduction in advertising and promotion expenses. Operating profit of the Refrigerated & Frozen segment was impacted by charges totaling approximately $7.7 million in fiscal 2017 related to a product recall, as well as charges of $6.2 million and $21.1 million in connection with our restructuring plans in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively.
International incurred an operating loss for fiscal 2017 of $168.9 million and earned an operating profit of $66.7 million in fiscal 2016. The operating loss in fiscal 2017 includes charges totaling $235.9 million for the impairment of goodwill and an intangible brand asset in our Canadian and Mexican operations. Gross profits were $8.5 million lower in fiscal 2017 than in fiscal 2016, driven by the impact of foreign exchange rates. Operating profits were negatively impacted by $9.9 million from the impact of foreign exchange rates in fiscal 2017 relative to fiscal 2016.
Foodservice operating profit for fiscal 2017 was $105.1 million, an increase of $7.4 million, or 8%, compared to fiscal 2016. Gross profits were $5.6 million lower in fiscal 2017 than in fiscal 2016, driven by volume declines and product supply shortfalls. This was offset by an inventory write-down in fiscal 2016 at a foreign non-core popcorn business that we have since exited. Operating profit of the Foodservice segment was impacted by charges of $1.8 million in fiscal 2017 in connection with our restructuring plans.
Commercial operating profit was $202.6 million in fiscal 2017 and $45.4 million in fiscal 2016. The Company sold the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses in the first quarter of fiscal 2017, recognizing pre-tax gains totaling $197.4 million. The Spicetec and JM Swank businesses comprise the entire Commercial segment following the presentation of Lamb Weston as discontinued operations. There are no further operations in the Commercial segment.


Interest Expense, Net
In fiscal 2017, net interest expense was $195.5 million, a decrease of $100.3 million, or 34%, from fiscal 2016. The decrease reflects the repayment of $2.15 billion, $550 million, and $473 million of debt in the third quarter of fiscal 2016, the first quarter of fiscal 2017, and the third quarter of fiscal 2017, respectively, as well as the exchange of $1.44 billion of debt in connection with the Spinoff of Lamb Weston during the second quarter of 2017.
Income Taxes
Our income tax expense was $254.7 million and $46.4 million in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively. The effective tax rate (calculated as the ratio of income tax expense to pre-tax income from continuing operations, inclusive of equity method investment earnings) was approximately 32% for fiscal 2017 and 27% for fiscal 2016.
The effective tax rate in fiscal 2017 reflects the following:
additional tax expense associated with non-deductible goodwill sold in connection with the divestitures of the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses,
additional tax expense associated with non-deductible goodwill in our Mexican and Canadian businesses, for which an impairment charge was recognized,
an income tax benefit for the adjustment of a valuation allowance associated with the planned divestiture of the Wesson® oil business,
an income tax benefit for excess tax benefits allowed upon the vesting/exercise of employee stock compensation awards by our employees, beyond that which is attributable to the original fair value of the awards upon the date of grant, and
an income tax benefit associated with a tax planning strategy that allowed us to utilize certain state tax attributes and certain foreign incentives.
The effective tax rate in fiscal 2016 reflects the following:
additional tax expense related to legal entity changes for a business retained from the Private Brands business,
a charge for the prior year implementation of a new tax position, and
an income tax benefit of normal, recurring, income tax credits and deductions combined with a lower pre-tax level of earnings (due in large part to the impact of the write-off of $348.5 million of actuarial losses under our method of accounting for pension benefits).
Equity Method Investment Earnings
We include our share of the earnings of certain affiliates based on our economic ownership interest in the affiliates. Our most significant affiliate is the Ardent Mills joint venture. Our share of earnings from our equity method investment earnings were $71.2 million and $66.1 million for fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively. The increases are reflective of higher profits from the Ardent Mills joint venture due to more favorable wheat market conditions as well as improved operational effectiveness.
Results of Discontinued Operations
Our discontinued operations generated after-tax income of $141.4 million and $87.7$102.0 million in fiscal 20142017 and 2013, respectively.
The results for fiscal 2014 reflect a pre-tax gain of $90.0 million ($55.7 million after-tax) related to the disposition of three flour milling facilities as part of the Ardent Mills formation.
In fiscal 2014, we also completed the sale of a small snack business, Medallion Foods, for $32.0 million in cash. We recognized an after-tax loss of $3.5$794.4 million on the sale of this business in fiscal 2014. In2016. Results reflected the operations of Lamb Weston through the date of its Spinoff in November 2016, as well as the results of the Private Brands business prior to its divestiture in the second half of fiscal 2014, we2016. We incurred significant costs associated with effecting the Spinoff. These costs are included in results of discontinued operations. We recognized an

27



impairmenta pre-tax charge relatedof $1.92 billion ($1.44 billion after-tax) in fiscal 2016 to allocated amounts ofwrite down the goodwill and intangible assets, totaling $15.2 million after-tax, in anticipation of this divestiture. We also completed the sale of thelong-lived assets of the Lightlife®Private Brands business for $54.7 million in cash. We recognized an after-tax gain of $19.8 million onto the sale of this business in fiscal 2014.final sales price, less costs to sell, and to recognize the final loss.


Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Our fiscal 2014 dilutedDiluted earnings per share from continuing operationsin fiscal 2017 were $0.70,$1.46, including $0.37earnings of $1.25 per diluted share from continuing operations and income of $0.33$0.21 per diluted share from discontinued operations. Our fiscal 2013 diluted earningsDiluted loss per share from continuing operations were $1.85,in fiscal 2016 was $1.56, including $1.64earnings of $0.29 per diluted share from continuing operations and incomea loss of $0.21$1.85 per diluted share from discontinued operations. See "Items Impacting Comparability" above as several significant items affected the comparability of year-over-year results of operations.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Sources of Liquidity and Capital
OurThe primary objective of our financing objectivestrategy is to maintain a prudent capital structure that provides us flexibility to pursue our growth objectives. If necessary, we use short-term debt principally to finance ongoing operations, including our seasonal requirements for working capital (accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, and inventories, less accounts payable, accrued payroll, and other accrued liabilities), and a combination of equity and long-term debt to finance both our base working capital needs and our non-current assets. We are committed to maintaining an investment grade credit rating.
At May 31, 2015,27, 2018, we had a $1.5 billion revolving credit facility. The facility is scheduled(the "Facility") with a syndicate of financial institutions that provides for a maximum aggregate principal amount outstanding at any one time of $1.25 billion (subject to mature in September 2018. Theincrease to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $1.75 billion with the consent of the lenders). We have historically used a credit facility has historically been used principally as a back-up facility for our commercial paper program. As of May 31, 2015,27, 2018, there were no outstanding borrowings under the facility. The facility requires thatFacility. On July 11, 2018, subsequent to our consolidated funded debt not exceed 65%of our consolidated capital base and that our fixed charges coverage ratio be greater than 1.75 to 1.0. On March 23, 2015, the Companyfiscal year end, we entered into an amendmentamended and restated revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions providing for a revolving credit facility in a maximum aggregate principal amount outstanding at any one time of $1.6 billion (subject to increase to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $2.1 billion). It replaces the existing Facility and generally requires our ratio of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) to interest expense to be not less than 3.0 to 1.0 and our ratio of funded debt to EBITDA to not exceed certain specified levels, with each ratio to be calculated on a rolling four-quarter basis.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, we repaid the remaining principal balance of $70.0 million of our 2.1% senior notes on the maturity date of March 15, 2018.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we entered into a term loan agreement (the "Term Loan Agreement") with a financial institution. The Term Loan Agreement provides for term loans to the facility to exclude certain goodwill and other intangible asset impairments fromCompany in an aggregate principal amount not in excess of $300.0 million. During the calculationfourth quarter of fiscal 2018, we borrowed the full amount of the fixed charge coverage ratio. As$300.0 million provided for under the Term Loan Agreement. The proceeds from this borrowing were used to make a voluntary pension plan contribution in the amount of May 31, 2015,$300.0 million. The Term Loan Agreement matures on February 26, 2019. The term loan bears interest at a rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 0.75% per annum and is fully prepayable without penalty.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we wererepaid the remaining principal balance of $119.6 million of our 1.9% senior notes on the maturity date of January 25, 2018.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we repaid the remaining capital lease liability balance of $28.5 million in complianceconnection with these financial covenants.the early exit of an unfavorable lease contract.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2018, we issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate notes due October 9, 2020. The notes bear interest at a rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 0.50% per annum.
As of May 31, 2015,27, 2018, we had no amounts$277.0 million outstanding under our commercial paper program. The highest level of borrowings during fiscal 20152018 was $685.8$469.7 million. AsAs of May 25, 2014,28, 2017, we had $137.0$26.2 million in borrowingsoutstanding under our commercial paper program.
In January 2013, we borrowed $1.5 billion under a term loan facility ("Term Loan Facility") as part of the financing used to acquire Ralcorp. During the first quarter of fiscal 2015, we repaid the $900.0 million remaining principal balance and associated accrued interest, and terminated the Term Loan Facility. We were allowed to prepay borrowings without premium or penalty.
On July 21, 2014, we issued floating rate senior unsecured notes in the aggregate principal amount of $550.0 million due July 2016. The notes carry an interest rate equal to the three-month LIBOR plus 0.37%. The net proceeds were used to repay $225.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2023, $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2043, $25.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2019, $25.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2018, and $25.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2017, in each case prior to maturity in a tender offer, and reduce our commercial paper balances.
As of the end of fiscal 2015,2018, our senior long-term debt ratings were all investment grade. A significant downgrade in our credit ratings would not affect our ability to borrow amounts under the revolving credit facility,Facility, although borrowing costs would increase. A downgrade of our short-term credit ratings would impact our ability to borrow under our commercial paper program by negatively impacting borrowing costs and causing shorter durations, as well as making access to commercial paper more difficult.


The Company has secured $9.0 billion in fully committed bridge financing from affiliates of Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in connection with the Merger. The commitments under the committed bridge financing were subsequently reduced by the amounts of a term loan agreement we entered into on July 11, 2018 with a syndicate of financial institutions providing for term loans to us in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1.3 billion. The funding under the term loan agreement is anticipated to occur simultaneously with the closing date of the acquisition. In connection with the merger, we expect to incur up to $8.3 billion of long-term debt (which includes any funding under the new term loan agreement), including for the payment of the cash portion of the merger consideration, the repayment of Pinnacle debt, the refinancing of certain Conagra debt, and the payment of related fees and expenses. The permanent financing is also expected to include approximately $600 million of incremental cash proceeds from the issuance of equity and/or divestitures.
We repurchase our shares of our common stock from time to time after considering market conditions and in accordance with repurchase limits authorized by our Board of Directors. In December 2011, the Company's Board of Directors approved a $750.0 million increase to ourThe share repurchase authorization.authorization has no expiration date. Under the share repurchase authorization, we may repurchase our shares periodically over several years, depending on market conditions and other factors, and may do so in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions. The authorization has no time limit and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. WeDuring fiscal 2018, we repurchased 1.427.4 million shares of our common stock under this authorization for an aggregate of $50.0 million under this program in fiscal 2015.$967.3 million. In May 2018, our Board of Directors approved an additional $1.0 billion of share repurchases. The Company's total remaining share repurchase authorization as of May 31, 201527, 2018, was $131.9 million.

28



$1.41 billion. In fiscal 2015, we received $505.4 million in cash (net of $49.0 million contributed to Ardent Mills) upon the formation of Ardent Mills, which included $163.0 million associated with the sale of three flour milling facilities in fiscal 2014 and a payment of $11.5 million to Ardent Mills for a working capital adjustment in the secondfourth quarter of fiscal 2015.2018, we suspended share repurchase activity in light of the pending acquisition of Pinnacle. The Company plans to repurchase shares under its authorized program only at times and in amounts as is consistent with the prioritization of achieving its leverage targets.
On April 20, 2018, the Board of Directors authorized a quarterly dividend payment of $0.2125 per share, which was paid on May 31, 2018 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on April 30, 2018. Subject to market and other conditions and the approval of our Board of Directors, we intend to maintain our quarterly dividend at the current annual rate of $0.85 per share during fiscal 2019. In fiscal 2015, the Company completed its multi-year debt reduction goalfuture, we expect modest dividend increases while we focus on deleveraging, subject to the approval of repaying $2.1 billion betweenour Board of Directors.
During the third quarter of fiscal 20132018, we entered into an agreement to sell our Del Monte® processed fruit and vegetable business in Canada to Bonduelle Group. The transaction was completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, and was valued at approximately $43.0 million Canadian dollars, which was approximately $34.0 million U.S. dollars at the exchange rate on the date of announcement.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we signed an agreement to sell our Wesson® oil business to Smucker for $285 million. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, Conagra Brands and Smucker terminated the agreement. This outcome followed the decision of the Federal Trade Commission, announced on March 5, 2018, to challenge the pending transaction. The Company is still actively marketing the Wesson® oil business and expects to sell it within the next twelve months.
We have access to the $1.25 billion Facility, our commercial paper program, and the end of fiscal 2015, exceedingcapital markets. We believe we also have access to additional bank loan facilities, if needed.
We expect to maintain or have access to sufficient liquidity to finance the goal of $2.0 billion of debt repayment in that time period. Despite the progress in debt reduction, the Company continues to have a substantial amount of debt outstanding. Given weaker-than-planned operating performance, the Company’s leverage ratios are still higher than targeted, so debt reduction is expected to remain a component of capital allocation in the foreseeable future.
On June 30, 2015, the Company announced its intention to sell the Private Brands operations. At this time the impactcash portion of the sale of these operations on the Company's liquidity is unknown.merger consideration as well as to either retire or refinance senior debt upon maturity, as market conditions warrant, from operating cash flows, our commercial paper program, proceeds from any divestitures and other disposition transactions, access to capital markets, and our $1.25 billion Facility.
Cash Flows
In fiscal 2015,2018, we used $123.4 million of cash, which was the net result of $954.2 million generated$1.48 billion from operating activities, $576.2 million used $41.6 million forin investing activities, $506.9 million used $1.43 billion forin financing activities, and had a decreasean increase of $8.8$5.5 million in cash due to the effecteffects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Cash generated from operating activities of continuing operations totaled $1.47 billion$919.7 million in fiscal 2015,2018, as compared to $1.45$1.14 billion generated in fiscal 2014. Operating2017. The decrease in operating cash outflows for interest payments decreased $57.9 million to $337.7 million in fiscal 2015 as aflows was primarily the net result of the decreasesincreased pension plan payments and changes in outstanding debt. We contributed $13.5working capital, offset by reduced income tax and interest payments. Pension plan payments mainly consisted of voluntary contributions totaling $300.0 million and $18.3$150.0 million for fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively. Year-over-year increases in receivables, higher inventory build, and payments made to our pension plans interminate an unfavorable operating lease negatively impacted operating cash flows for fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively. We paid approximately $86.0 million less in annual incentive compensation2018 compared to fiscal 2017. Income tax payment reductions were driven by the impact of corporate tax rate reductions resulting from the Tax Act signed into law during the third quarter of


fiscal 2018. Significant debt repayments during fiscal 2017 contributed to decreased interest payments in fiscal 2015 (earned in fiscal 2014) than in fiscal 2014 (earned in fiscal 2013). Increases in inventory in fiscal 2015 resulted from lower volumes in international shipments in our fiscal third quarter due to the slowdown from the West Coast port labor dispute, expansion of our potato manufacturing capacity in the United States and China, higher durum wheat costs, and larger harvests of corn, tomatoes, and potatoes. Reductions in cash outflows for advertising and promotions in our Consumer Foods business have been largely offset by increases in trade promotions. During fiscal 2015, our income tax payments were approximately $47.7 million more than those made in fiscal 2014, due primarily to prior year income tax deductions2018. Payments related to the Ralcorp debt exchangeincentive compensation and Ralcorp loss carryforwards fromour restructuring plans were also reduced for fiscal 2013. We received dividends of $77.9 million from our investment in the Ardent Mills joint venture during2018 compared to fiscal 2015. 2017.
Cash generated from operating activities of discontinued operations was $6.9$34.5 million and $114.0$34.7 million in fiscal 20152018 and fiscal 2014, respectively, reflecting2017, respectively. This primarily reflects the timingactivities of the millingLamb Weston business disposition.that was spun off on November 9, 2016 and, to a lesser extent, other divested businesses. Operating cash flows of discontinued operations in fiscal 2017 were also impacted by expenses related to the Spinoff.
InvestingCash used in investing activities used $41.6of continuing operations totaled $576.2 million in fiscal 2015 versus $531.52018 compared to $65.6 million in fiscal 2017. Investing activities of continuing operations of fiscal 2018 consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $251.6 million and the purchases of the 2014Sandwich Bros. of Wisconsin.®business and Angie's Artisan Treats, LLC for a total of $337.1 million, net of cash acquired. Investing activities of continuing operations in fiscal 2015 consisted primarily2017 included the proceeds from the divestitures of the Spicetec and JM Swank businesses totaling $489.0 million in the aggregate, partially offset by capital expenditures of $471.9$242.1 million, and acquisitions totaling $325.7 million, including the operating assets of a potato manufacturerFrontera Foods, Inc. and Red Fork LLC, and the protein-based snacking businesses Thanasi Foods LLC and BIGS LLC.
Cash used in China and an organic frozen food business in the United States totaling $95.7 million. Capital expenditures in fiscal 2015 were lower than fiscal 2014 as a result of fewer significant plant expansions and improvements. In fiscal 2014, we purchased certain frozen dessert production assets for $39.9 million million. The fiscal 2015 investments were offset by $391.4 million in cash received from Ardent Mills in connection with the formation of that joint venture. Cash generated from investing activities of discontinued operations in fiscal 2015 totaled $114.0 million resulting from receipt of $163.0 million cash associated with the sale of three flour milling facilities at the end of fiscal 2014, partially offset by $49.0 million cash contributed to Ardent Mills upon the formation of the joint venture. Investing activities of discontinued operations generated $58.2 million in fiscal 20142017 resulted primarily from the sale of assets of the Lightlife and Medallion Foods businesses offset by capital expenditures in our former milling operations.expenditures.
Cash used for financing activities of continuing operations totaled $1.43$506.9 million in fiscal 2018 compared to $2.41 billion in fiscal 2015 compared to $1.03 billion in2017. Financing activities of continuing operations for fiscal 2014. In fiscal 2015, we repaid $1.50 billion2018 consisted primarily of common stock repurchases of $967.3 million, net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt partially financed by the issuance of $550.0$797.0 million, aggregate principal amountcash dividend payments of floating rate notes. We also reduced short term$342.3 million, long-term debt primarily commercial paper, by $150.0 million. In fiscal 2014, we decreased our total debt by $612.4 million, including the repayment of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.875% senior notes upon maturity in April 2014. During fiscal 2015 and 2014, we paid dividends of $425.2repayments totaling $242.3 million, and $420.9 million, respectively. Innet short-term borrowings of $249.1 million. Cash used in financing activities of continuing operations in fiscal 2015 and 2014, we repurchased $50.0 million and $100.0 million, respectively,2017 reflected debt repayments of our$1.06 billion, common stock as partrepurchases totaling $1.0 billion, and dividends paid of our share repurchase program. Amounts generated from proceeds of$415.0 million, partially offset by employee stock option exercises and the issuance of other stock awards of $73.8 million.
Cash provided by financing activities of discontinued operations principally comprises borrowings by Lamb Weston which were $153.8 million and $103.7 milliontransferred in fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively.connection with the Spinoff.

29



The Company had cash and cash equivalents of $183.1$128.0 million at May 31, 201527, 2018, and $141.3$251.4 million at May 25, 2014,28, 2017, of which $102.3$121.6 million at May 31, 201527, 2018, and $104.5$244.9 million at May 25, 201428, 2017, was held in foreign countries. As of May 31, 2015 and May 25, 2014, certain ofDuring the Company's foreign subsidiaries had extended short term loans to domestic entities totaling $36.4 million and $37.8 million, respectively. Domestic entities repaid these amounts early in the first fiscalsecond quarter of fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively. The2018, the Company makes an assertion regarding the amountrepatriated $151.3 million of earnings intended for permanent reinvestmentcash balances previously deemed to be permanently reinvested outside the United States, with the balance availableU.S. Refer to be repatriatedNote 15 "Pre-tax Income and Income Taxes" to the United States. Theconsolidated financial statements contained in this report for more information related to this repatriation of cash held by foreign subsidiaries for permanent reinvestment is generally usedand related adjustments to finance the subsidiaries' operational activities and future foreign investments. No related tax liability has been accrued as of May 31, 2015. At May 31, 2015, management does not intend to permanently repatriate additional foreign cash. Any future decision to repatriate foreign cash could result in an adjustment to the deferred tax liability, after considering availableas well as the impacts of the Tax Act on remaining unremitted earnings of our foreign tax credits and other tax attributes. It is not practicable to determine the amount of any such deferred tax liability at this time.subsidiaries.
Our preliminary estimate of capital expenditures for fiscal 20162019 is approximately $575 million. This includes$350 million, excluding any incremental amounts attributable toresulting from the Private Brands operations we intend to divest.pending acquisition of Pinnacle.
Management believes that existingthe Company's sources of liquidity will be adequate finance the cash balances, cash flows from operations, existing credit facilities, and accessportion of the merger consideration, to capital markets will provide sufficient liquidity to meet oursatisfy working capital needs, repurchase shares of our common stock from time to time, make payments of anticipated quarterly dividends, complete planned capital expenditures, and payment of anticipated quarterly dividendsmake any required debt repayments, including by retiring or refinancing senior debt upon maturity (as market conditions warrant), for at least the next twelve months.foreseeable future.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We use off-balance sheet arrangements (e.g., leases accounted for as operating leases) where sound business principles warrant their use. We also periodically enter into guarantees and other similar arrangements as part of transactions in the ordinary course of business. These are described further in "Obligations and Commitments," below.
Variable Interest Entities Not Consolidated
We have variable interests in certain entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities, but for which we are not the primary beneficiary. We do not consolidate the financial statements of these entities.
We hold a 50.0% interest in Lamb Weston RDO, a potato processing venture. We provide all sales and marketing services to Lamb Weston RDO. We receive a fee for these services based on a percentage of the net sales of the venture. We reflect the value of our ownership interest in this venture in other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, based upon the equity method of accounting. The balance of our investment was $14.6 million and $12.6 million at May 31, 2015 and May 25, 2014, respectively, representing our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with this venture. The capital structure of Lamb Weston RDO includes owners' equity of $29.2 million and term borrowings from banks of $41.6 million as of May 31, 2015. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of this venture.
We lease or leased certain office buildings from entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities. The lease agreements with these entities include fixed-price purchase options for the assets being leased. The lease agreements also contain contingent put options (the "lease put options") that allow or allowed the lessors to require us to purchase the buildings at the greater of original construction cost, or fair market value, without a lease agreement in place (the "put price") in certain limited circumstances. As a result of substantial impairment charges related to our divested Private Brands operations, these


lease put options became exercisable. During fiscal 2016, we entered into a series of related transactions in which we exchanged a warehouse we owned in Indiana for two buildings and parcels of land that we leased representingas part of our only variable interestOmaha corporate offices. Concurrent with the asset exchange, the leases on the two Omaha corporate buildings, which were subject to contingent put options, were canceled. We recognized aggregate charges of $55.6 million for the early termination of these leases. We also entered into a lease for the warehouse in Indiana and we recorded a financing lease obligation of $74.2 million. During fiscal 2017, one of these lessor entities. These leaseslease agreements expired. As a result of this expiration, we reversed the applicable accrual and recognized a benefit of $6.7 million in SG&A expenses. During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we purchased two buildings that were subject to lease put options and recognized net losses totaling $48.2 million for the early exit of unfavorable lease contracts.
As of May 27, 2018, there was one remaining leased building subject to a lease put option for which the put option price exceeded the estimated fair value of the property by $8.2 million, of which we had accrued $1.2 million. We are amortizing the difference between the put price and the estimated fair value (without a lease agreement in place) of the property over the remaining lease term within SG&A expenses. This lease is accounted for as an operating leases,lease, and accordingly, there are no material assets orand liabilities, other than the accrued portion of the put price, associated with these entitiesthis entity included in ourthe Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have no material exposure to loss from our variable interests in these entities. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of these entities.this entity. In making this determination, we have considered, among other items, the terms of the lease agreements,agreement, the expected remaining useful liveslife of the assetsasset leased, and the capital structure of the lessor entities.entity.

OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
As part of our ongoing operations, we enter into arrangements that obligate us to make future payments under contracts such as lease agreements, debt agreements, and unconditional purchase obligations (i.e., obligations to transfer funds in the future for fixed or minimum quantities of goods or services at fixed or minimum prices, such as "take-or-pay" contracts). The unconditional purchase obligation arrangements are entered into in our normal course of business in order to ensure adequate levels of sourced product are available. Of these items, debt, notes payable, and capital lease obligations, which totaled $7.8$3.80 billion as of May 31, 201527, 2018, were recognized as liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Operating lease obligations and

30



unconditional purchase obligations, which totaled $2.4$1.26 billion as of May 31, 201527, 2018, were not recognized as liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.principles ("U.S. GAAP").
A summary of our contractual obligations as of May 31, 201527, 2018, was as follows:
Payments Due by Period
(in millions)
Payments Due by Period
(in millions)
Contractual ObligationsTotal 
Less than
1 Year
 1-3 Years 3-5 Years 
After 5
Years
Total 
Less than
1 Year
 1-3 Years 3-5 Years 
After 5
Years
Long-term debt$7,732.5
 $1,000.6
 $2,260.2
 $475.0
 $3,996.7
$3,431.7
 $300.0
 $822.6
 $1,087.0
 $1,222.1
Capital lease obligations68.8
 8.4
 14.5
 8.7
 37.2
94.7
 7.1
 13.5
 13.5
 60.6
Operating lease obligations520.4
 86.3
 152.3
 97.3
 184.5
199.1
 35.6
 47.5
 33.7
 82.3
Purchase obligations1
1,851.4
 1,728.7
 89.5
 28.0
 5.2
Purchase obligations1 and other contracts
1,127.0
 966.7
 121.3
 37.6
 1.4
Notes payable7.9
 7.9
 
 
 
277.3
 277.3
 
 
 
Total$10,181.0
 $2,831.9
 $2,516.5
 $609.0
 $4,223.6
$5,129.8
 $1,586.7
 $1,004.9
 $1,171.8
 $1,366.4
1 Amount includes open purchase orders and agreements, some of which are not legally binding and/or may be cancellable. Such agreements are generally settleable in the ordinary course of business in less than one year.
We are also contractually obligated to pay interest on our long-term debt and capital lease obligations. The weighted averageweighted-average coupon interest rate of the long-term debt obligations outstanding as of May 31, 201527, 2018, was approximately 4.1%4.9%.
The operating lease obligations noted in the table above have not been reduced by non-cancellable sublease rentals of $29.6$0.5 million.
We own a 49.99% interest in Lamb Weston BSW, LLC ("Lamb Weston BSW"), a potato processing venture with Ochoa Ag Unlimited Foods, Inc. ("Ochoa"). We provide all sales and marketing services to Lamb Weston BSW. Under certain circumstances, we could be required to compensate Ochoa for lost profits resulting from significant production shortfalls ("production shortfalls"). Commencing on June 1, 2018, or on an earlier date under certain circumstances, we have a contractual right to purchase the remaining equity interest in Lamb Weston BSW from Ochoa (the "call option"). We are currently subject to a contractual obligation to purchase all of Ochoa's equity investment in Lamb Weston BSW at the option of Ochoa (the "put option"). The purchase prices under the call option and the put option (the "options") are based on the book value of Ochoa's equity interest at the date of exercise, as modified by an agreed-upon rate of return for the holding period of the investment balance. The agreed-upon rate of return varies depending on the circumstances under which any of the options are exercised. As of May 31, 2015, the price at which Ochoa27, 2018, we had the right to put its equity interest to us was $41.6 million.aggregate unfunded pension obligations totaling $68.5 million. This amount which is presented within other noncurrent liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, is not included in the "Contractual Obligations" table above asabove. In the payment is contingent uponfourth quarter of fiscal 2018, we made a voluntary pension plan contribution in the exerciseamount of $300.0 million. We do not expect to be required to make additional payments to fund these amounts in the put option by Ochoa,foreseeable future. Based on current statutory requirements, we are not obligated to fund any amount to our qualified pension plans during the next


twelve months. We estimate that we will make payments of approximately $19.6 million over the next twelve months to fund our pension plans. See Note 19 "Pension and Postretirement Benefits" to the eventual occurrenceconsolidated financial statements and timing"Critical Accounting Estimates - Employment Related Benefits" contained in this report for further discussion of such exercise is uncertain.our pension obligations and factors that could affect estimates of this liability.
As part of our ongoing operations, we also enter into arrangements that obligate us to make future cash payments only upon the occurrence of a future event (e.g., guarantees of debt or lease payments of a third party should the third party be unable to perform). In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,U.S. GAAP, the following commercial commitments are not recognized as liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. A summary of our commitments, including commitments associated with equity method investments, as of May 31, 201527, 2018, was as follows:
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
(in millions)
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
(in millions)
Other Commercial CommitmentsTotal 
Less than
1 Year
 1-3 Years 3-5 Years 
After 5
Years
Total 
Less than
1 Year
 1-3 Years 3-5 Years 
After 5
Years
Guarantees$68.7
 $44.7
 $5.4
 $8.4
 $10.2
Standby Repurchase Obligations2.8
 1.1
 0.5
 0.5
 0.7
Standby repurchase obligations$0.9
 $0.6
 $0.3
 $
 $
Other commitments2.0
 2.0
 
 
 
6.1
 4.1
 2.0
 
 
Total$73.5
 $47.8
 $5.9
 $8.9
 $10.9
$7.0
 $4.7
 $2.3
 $
 $
We are a partyIn addition to various potato supply agreements. Under the terms of certain such potato supply agreements, we have guaranteed repayment of short-term bank loans of the potato suppliers, under certain conditions. At May 31, 2015, the amount

31



of supplier loans effectively guaranteed by us was $39.3 million, included in the table above. We have not established a liability for these guarantees, as we have determined that the likelihood of our required performance under the guarantees is remote.
Federal income tax credits were generated related to our sweet potato production facility in Delhi, Louisiana. Third parties invested in these income tax credits. We have guaranteed these third parties the face value of these income tax credits over their statutory lives, through fiscal 2017, in the event that the income tax credits are recaptured or reduced. The face value of the income tax credits was $26.7 million,commitments included in the table above, as of May 31, 2015.27, 2018, we had $32.4 million of standby letters of credit issued on our behalf. These standby letters of credit are primarily related to our self-insured workers compensation programs and are not reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In certain limited situations, we will guarantee an obligation of an unconsolidated entity. We believeguarantee certain leases resulting from the likelihooddivestiture of the recapture or reductionJM Swank business completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. As of May 27, 2018, the remaining terms of these arrangements do not exceed five years and the maximum amount of future payments we have guaranteed was $2.6 million. In addition, we guarantee a certain lease resulting from an exited facility. As of May 27, 2018, the remaining term of this arrangement does not exceed nine years and the maximum amount of future payments we have guaranteed was $21.7 million.
In certain limited situations, we also guarantee obligations of the income tax credits is remote, and therefore we have not established a liability in connection with this guarantee.
We hold a fifty percent ownership interest in Lamb-Weston/Meijer, V.O.F. (“Lamb Weston Meijer”business pursuant to guarantee arrangements that existed prior to the Spinoff and remained in place following completion of the Spinoff until such guarantee obligations are substituted for guarantees issued by Lamb Weston. Such guarantee arrangements are described below. Pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016 (the "Separation Agreement"), a Netherlands joint venture, headquartered in the Netherlands, that manufacturesbetween us and sells frozen potato products principally in Europe. We and our partnerLamb Weston, these guarantee arrangements are jointly and severally liable for all legaldeemed liabilities of Lamb Weston Meijer.that were transferred to Lamb Weston as part of the Spinoff. Accordingly, in the event that we are required to make any payments as a result of these guarantee arrangements, Lamb Weston is obligated to indemnify us for any such liability, reduced by any insurance proceeds received by us, in accordance with the terms of the indemnification provisions under the Separation Agreement.
Lamb Weston is a party to a warehouse services agreement with a third-party warehouse provider through July 2035. Under this agreement, Lamb Weston is required to make payments for warehouse services based on the quantity of goods stored and other service factors. We have guaranteed the warehouse provider that we will make the payments required under the agreement in the event that Lamb Weston fails to perform. Minimum payments of $1.5 million per month are required under this agreement. It is not possible to determine the maximum amount of the payment obligations under this agreement. Upon completion of the Spinoff, we recognized a liability for the estimated fair value of this guarantee. As of May 31, 2015 and May 25, 2014,27, 2018, the totalamount of this guarantee, recorded in other noncurrent liabilities, of was $28.1 million.
Lamb Weston Meijer were $129.1 million and $144.7 million, respectively.is a party to an agricultural sublease agreement with a third party for certain farmland through 2020 (subject, at Lamb Weston's option, to extension for two additional five-year periods). Under the terms of the sublease agreement, Lamb Weston Meijer is well capitalized, with partners’ equity of $255.9 million and $247.0 million as of May 31, 2015 and May 25, 2014, respectively.required to make certain rental payments to the sublessor. We have not established a liability on our balance sheets forguaranteed Lamb Weston's performance and the obligationspayment of all amounts (including indemnification obligations) owed by Lamb Weston Meijer, asunder the sublease agreement, up to a maximum of $75.0 million. We believe the farmland associated with this sublease agreement is readily marketable for lease to other area farming operators. As such, we have determinedbelieve that any financial exposure to the likelihood of anycompany, in the event that we were required payment by us to settle such liabilities of Lamb Weston Meijer is remote.perform under the guaranty, would be largely mitigated.
The obligations and commitments tables above do not include any reserves for uncertainties in income taxes, as we are unable to reasonably estimate the ultimate amount or timing of settlement of our reserves for income taxes. The liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits at May 31, 201527, 2018, was $73.7 million.$32.5 million. The net amount of unrecognized tax benefits at May 31, 201527,


2018, that, if recognized, would favorably impact our effective tax rate was $43.2 million.$27.8 million. Recognition of these tax benefits would have a favorable impact on our effective tax rate.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The process of preparing financial statements requires the use of estimates on the part of management. The estimates used by management are based on our historical experiences combined with management’smanagement's understanding of current facts and circumstances. Certain of our accounting estimates are considered critical as they are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results and require significant or complex judgment on the part of management. The following is a summary of certain accounting estimates considered critical by management.
Our Audit/Finance Committee has reviewed management’smanagement's development, selection, and disclosure of the critical accounting estimates.
Marketing Costs—We incur certain costs to promote our products through marketing programs, which include advertising, customer incentives, and consumer incentives. We recognize the cost of each of these types of marketing activities as incurred in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.U.S. GAAP. The judgment required in determining marketing costs can be significant. For volume-based incentives provided to customers, management must continually assess the likelihood of the customer achieving the specified targets. Similarly, for consumer coupons, management must estimate the level at which coupons will be redeemed by consumers in the future. Estimates made by management in accounting for marketing costs are based primarily on our historical experience with marketing programs with consideration given to current circumstances and industry trends. As these factors change, management’smanagement's estimates could change and we could recognize different amounts of marketing costs over different periods of time.
We have recognized reserves of $159.9$100.5 million for these marketing costs as of May 31, 2015.27, 2018. Changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual customer marketing program(including amounts classified as a revenue reduction) would not result in a material change in our results of operations or cash flows.
Advertising and promotion expenses totaled $344.2$278.6 million, $414.0$328.3 million, and $463.4$347.2 million in fiscal 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, respectively.
Income Taxes—Our income tax expense is based on our income, statutory tax rates, and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and respective governmental taxing authorities. Significant judgment is required in determining our income tax expense and in evaluating our tax positions, including evaluating uncertainties. Management reviews tax positions at least quarterly and adjusts the balances as new information becomes available. Deferred income tax assets represent amounts available to reduce income taxes payable on taxable income in future years. Such assets arise because of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in our consolidated balance sheets, as well as from net operating

32



loss and tax credit carryforwards. Management evaluates the recoverability of these future tax deductions by assessing the adequacy of future expected taxable income from all sources, including reversal of taxable temporary differences, forecasted operating earnings, and available tax planning strategies. These estimates of future taxable income inherently require significant judgment. Management uses historical experience and short and long-range business forecasts to develop such estimates. Further, we employ various prudent and feasible tax planning strategies to facilitate the recoverability of future deductions. To the extent management does not consider it more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will be recovered, a valuation allowance is established.
Further information on income taxes is provided in Note 15 "Pre-tax Income and Income TaxesTaxes" to the consolidated financial statements.
Environmental Liabilities—Environmental liabilities are accrued when it is probable that obligations have been incurred and the associated amounts can be reasonably estimated. Management works with independent third-party specialists in order to effectively assess our environmental liabilities. Management estimates our environmental liabilities based on evaluation of investigatory studies, extent of required clean-up, our known volumetric contribution, other potentially responsible parties, and our experience in remediating sites. Environmental liability estimates may be affected by changing governmental or other external determinations of what constitutes an environmental liability or an acceptable level of clean-up. Management’sManagement's estimate as to our potential liability is independent of any potential recovery of insurance proceeds or indemnification arrangements. Insurance companies and other indemnitors are notified of any potential claims and periodically updated as to the general status of known claims. We do not discount our environmental liabilities as the timing of the anticipated cash


payments is not fixed or readily determinable. To the extent that there are changes in the evaluation factors identified above, management’smanagement's estimate of environmental liabilities may also change.
We have recognized a reserve of approximately $55.0$57.8 million for environmental liabilities as of May 31, 2015.27, 2018. The reserve for each site is determined based on an assessment of the most likely required remedy and a related estimate of the costs required to effect such remedy. In fiscal 2013, we made an adjustment to the reserve of $4.5 million to increase our estimate based on expected payments.
Employment-Related Benefits—We incur certain employment-related expenses associated with pensions, postretirement health care benefits, and workers’workers' compensation. In order to measure the annual expense associated with these employment-related benefits, management must make a variety of estimates including, but not limited to, discount rates used to measure the present value of certain liabilities, assumed rates of return on assets set aside to fund these expenses, compensation increases, employee turnover rates, anticipated mortality rates, anticipated health care costs, and employee accidents incurred but not yet reported to us. The estimates used by management are based on our historical experience as well as current facts and circumstances. We use third-party specialists to assist management in appropriately measuring the expense associated with these employment-related benefits. Different estimates used by management could result in us recognizing different amounts of expense over different periods of time.
Beginning in fiscal 2017, the Company has elected to use a split discount rate (the "spot-rate approach") for the U.S. plans and certain foreign plans. Historically, a single weighted-average discount rate was used in the calculation of service and interest costs, both of which are components of pension benefit costs. The spot-rate approach applies separate discount rates for each projected benefit payment in the calculation of pension service and interest cost. This change is considered a change in accounting estimate and has been applied prospectively. The pre-tax reduction in total pension benefit cost associated with this change in fiscal 2017 was approximately $27.0 million.
We have recognized a pension liability of $573.7$171.5 million and $451.8$582.2 million, a postretirement liability of $235.3$118.2 million and $283.2$156.9 million, and a workers’workers' compensation liability of $100.1$39.4 million and $107.7$41.5 million, as of the end of fiscal 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively. We also have recognized a pension asset of $20.5$103.0 million and $18.8$17.1 million as of the end of fiscal 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively, as certain individual plans of the Company had a positive funded status.
We recognize cumulative changes in the fair value of pension plan assets and net actuarial gains or losses in excess of 10% of the greater of the fair value of plan assets or the plan’splan's projected benefit obligation (“("the corridor”corridor") in current period expense annually as of our measurement date, which is our fiscal year-end, or when measurement is required otherwise under generally accepted accounting principles.U.S. GAAP.
We recognized pension expense (benefit), including activities of discontinued operations, from Company plans of $0.9$(56.1) million, $(5.9)$(12.9) million, and $23.5$370.8 million in fiscal years 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, respectively. Such amounts reflect the year-end write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of our pension liability of $6.9 million, $3.4 million, $1.2 million, and $5.7$348.5 million in fiscal years 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, respectively. This also reflected expected returns on plan assets of $267.9$218.3 million, $252.9$207.4 million, and $216.4$259.9 million in fiscal years 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, respectively. We contributed $13.5$312.6 million, $18.3$163.0 million, and $19.8$11.5 million to the pension plans of our continuing operations in fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. We anticipate contributing approximately $19.6 million to our pension plans in fiscal years 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. We anticipate contributing approximately $13.0 million to our pension plans in fiscal 2016.2019.
One significant assumption for pension plan accounting is the discount rate. We selectHistorically, we have selected a discount rate each year (as of our fiscal year-end measurement date) for our plans based upon a hypotheticalhigh-quality corporate bond portfolioyield curve for which the cash flows from coupons and maturities match the year-by-year projected benefit cash flows for our pension plans. The hypotheticalcorporate bond

33



portfolio yield curve is comprised of high-quality fixed income debt instruments (usually Moody’sMoody's Aa) available at the measurement date. At May 29, 2016, the Company changed to use a spot-rate approach, discussed above. This alternative approach focuses on measuring the service cost and interest cost components of net periodic benefit cost by using individual spot rates derived from a high-quality corporate bond yield curve and matched with separate cash flows for each future year instead of a single weighted-average discount rate approach.
Based on this information, the discount rate selected by us for determination of pension expense was 4.15%3.90% for fiscal 2015, 4.05%2018, 3.83% for fiscal 2014,2017, and 4.5%4.10% for fiscal 2013.2016. We selected a weighted-average discount rate of 4.10%4.21% and 3.83% for determination of pensionservice and interest expense, respectively, for fiscal 2016.2019. A 25 basis point increase in our discount rate assumption as of the end of fiscal 20152018 would have resulted in a decreasean increase of $2.9$3.9 million in our pension expense for fiscal 2015.2018. A 25 basis point decrease in our discount rate assumption as of the end of fiscal 20152018 would have resulted in an increasedecrease of $89.0$3.0 million in our pension expense for fiscal 2015. The disproportionate impact on pension expense of a reduction of our discount rate is due to our policy of writing-off actuarial losses in excess of 10% of our pension liability immediately.2018. For our year-end pension obligation determination, we selected discount rates of 4.10%4.14% and 4.15%3.90% for fiscal years 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively.


Another significant assumption used to account for our pension plans is the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. In developing the assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets for determining pension expense, we consider long-term historical returns (arithmetic average) of the plan’splan's investments, the asset allocation among types of investments, estimated long-term returns by investment type from external sources, and the current economic environment. Based on this information, we selected 7.75%7.50% for the long-term rate of return on plan assets for determining our fiscal 20152018 pension expense. A 25 basis point increase/decrease in our expected long-term rate of return assumption as of the beginning of fiscal 20152018 would decrease/increase annual pension expense for our pension plans by $8.7$7.3 million.
During fiscal 2018, we approved an amendment of our salaried and non-qualified pension plans. The amendment froze the compensation and service periods used to calculate pension benefits for active employees who participate in those plans. As a result of this amendment, we have changed our salaried and non-qualified pension asset investment strategy to align our related pension plan assets with our projected benefit obligation to reduce volatility. We selected ana weighted-average expected rate of return on plan assets of 7.75%5.17% to be used to determine our pension expense for fiscal 2016.2019. A 25 basis point increase/decrease in our expected long-term rate of return assumption as of the beginning of fiscal 20162019 would decrease/increase annual pension expense for our pension plans by $8.7$8.2 million.
The rate of compensation increase is another significant assumption used in the development of accounting information for pension plans. We determineDue to the amendment discussed above, this assumption based onis no longer applicable for any of our long-termpension plans for compensation increasesin fiscal 2019 and current economic conditions. Based on this information, we selected 3.70% and 4.25% for fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively, as the rate of compensation increase for determining our year-end pension obligation.thereafter. We selected 4.25%3.63% for the rate of compensation increase for determination of pension expense for each of fiscal years 2015, 2014,year 2018, 3.66% for fiscal 2017, and 2013.3.70% for fiscal 2016. A 25 basis point increase in our rate of compensation increase assumption as of the beginning of fiscal 20152018 would increase pension expense for our pension plans by $0.8$0.5 million for the year. A 25 basis point decrease in our rate of compensation increase assumption as of the beginning of fiscal 20152018 would decrease pension expense for our pension plans by $1.2 million for the year. We selected a rate of 3.70% for the rate of compensation increase to be used to determine our pension expense for fiscal 2016. A 25 basis point increase in our rate of compensation increase assumption as of the beginning of fiscal 2016 would increase pension expense for our pension plans by $1.1 million for the year. A 25 basis point decrease in our rate of compensation increase assumption as of the beginning of fiscal 2016 would decrease pension expense for our pension plans by $1.6$0.5 million for the year.
In October 2014,2016, The Society of Actuaries' Retirement Plan Experience Committee published newupdated mortality tablesimprovement scales and recommended their use with base mortality tables for the measurement of U.S. pension plan obligations. With the assistance of our third-party actuary, in measuring our pension obligations as of May 31, 2015,28, 2017, we incorporated a revised assumptionsimprovement scale to be used with our current base mortality tables that generally reflect the mortality improvement inherent in these new tables.
During 2018, we conducted a mortality experience study and, with the assistance of our third-party actuary, adopted new company-specific mortality tables used in measuring our pension obligations as adjusted for experience specificof May 27, 2018. In addition, we incorporated a revised mortality improvement scale to our industry.be used with the new company-specific mortality tables that reflects the mortality improvement inherent in these tables. 
We also provide certain postretirement health care benefits. We recognized postretirement benefit expense (benefit) of $6.1$0.7 million, $9.9$(1.2) million, and $8.8$0.2 million in fiscal 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, respectively. We reflected liabilities of $235.3$118.2 million and $283.2$156.9 million in our balance sheets as of May 31, 201527, 2018 and May 25, 2014,28, 2017, respectively. We anticipate contributing approximately $23.7$16.2 million to our postretirement health care plans in fiscal 2016.2019.
The postretirement benefit expense and obligation are also dependent on our assumptions used for the actuarially determined amounts. These assumptions include discount rates (discussed above), health care cost trend rates, inflation rates, retirement rates, mortality rates (also discussed above), and other factors. The health care cost trend assumptions are developed based on historical cost data, the near-term outlook, and an assessment of likely long-term trends. Assumed inflation rates are based on an evaluation of external market indicators. Retirement and mortality rates are based primarily on actual plan experience. The discount rate we selected for determination of postretirement expense was 3.65%3.33% for fiscal 2015, 3.35%2018, 3.18% for fiscal 2014,2017, and 3.9%3.50% for fiscal 2013.2016. We have selected a weighted-average discount rate of 3.5%3.81% for determination of postretirement expense for fiscal 2016.2019. A 25 basis point increase/decrease in our discount rate assumption as of the beginning of fiscal 20152018 would not have resulted in a material change to postretirement expense for our plans. We have assumed the initial year increase in cost of health care to be 9.0%7.87%, with the trend rate decreasing to 4.5% by 2023.2024. A one percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects:

34



($ in millions) 
One  Percent
Increase
 
One  Percent
Decrease
 
One Percent
Increase
 
One Percent
Decrease
Effect on total service and interest cost $0.6
 $(0.5) $0.3
 $(0.3)
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation 14.0
 (12.5) 3.9
 (3.5)


We provide workers’workers' compensation benefits to our employees. The measurement of the liability for our cost of providing these benefits is largely based upon actuarial analysis of costs. One significant assumption we make is the discount rate used to calculate the present value of our obligation. The weighted-average discount rate used at May 31, 201527, 2018 was 2.16%2.88%. A 25 basis point increase/decrease in the discount rate assumption would not have a material impact on workers’workers' compensation expense.expense or the liability.
Business Combinations, Impairment of Long-Lived Assets (including property, plant and equipment), Identifiable Intangible Assets, and Goodwill—We use the acquisition method in accounting for acquired businesses. Under the acquisition method, our financial statements reflect the operations of an acquired business starting from the closing of the acquisition. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Significant judgment is often required in estimating the fair value of assets acquired, particularly intangible assets. As a result, in the case of significant acquisitions we normally obtain the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist in estimating fair values of tangible and intangible assets. The fair value estimates are based on available historical information and on expectations and assumptions about the future, considering the perspective of marketplace participants. While management believes those expectations and assumptions are reasonable, they are inherently uncertain. Unanticipated market or macroeconomic events and circumstances may occur, which could affect the accuracy or validity of the estimates and assumptions.
We reduce the carrying amounts of long-lived assets (including property, plant and equipment) to their fair values when their carrying amount is determined to not be recoverable. We generally compare undiscounted estimated future cash flows of an asset or asset group to the carrying values of the asset or asset group. If the undiscounted estimated future cash flows exceed the carrying values of the asset or asset group, no impairment is recognized. If the undiscounted estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying values of the asset or asset group, we write-down the asset or assets to their estimated fair values. The estimates of fair value are generally in the form of appraisal, or by discounting estimated future cash flows of the asset or asset group.
Determining the useful lives of intangible assets also requires management judgment. Certain brand intangibles are expected to have indefinite lives based on their history and our plans to continue to support and build the acquired brands, while other acquired intangible assets (e.g., customer relationships) are expected to have determinable useful lives. Our estimates of the useful lives of definite-lived intangible assets are primarily based upon historical experience, the competitive and macroeconomic environment, and our operating plans. The costs of definite-lived intangibles are amortized to expense over their estimated life.
We reduce the carrying amounts of indefinite-lived intangible assets, and goodwill to their fair values when the fair value of such assets is determined to be less than their carrying amounts (i.e., assets are deemed to be impaired). Fair value is typically estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, which requires us to estimate the future cash flows anticipated to be generated by the particular asset being tested for impairment as well as to select a discount rate to measure the present value of the anticipated cash flows. When determining future cash flow estimates, we consider historical results adjusted to reflect current and anticipated operating conditions. Estimating future cash flows requires significant judgment by management in such areas as future economic conditions, industry-specific conditions, product pricing, and necessary capital expenditures. The use of different assumptions or estimates for future cash flows could produce different impairment amounts (or none at all) for long-lived assets and identifiable intangible assets.
In assessing other intangible assets not subject to amortization for impairment, we have the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of such an intangible asset is less than its carrying amount. If we determine that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of such an intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, then we are not required to perform any additional tests for assessing intangible assets for impairment. However, if we conclude otherwise or elect not to perform the qualitative assessment, then we are required to perform a quantitative impairment test that involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

35



If we perform a quantitative impairment test in evaluating impairment of our indefinite lived brands/trademarks, we utilize a “relief"relief from royalty”royalty" methodology. The methodology determines the fair value of each brand through use of a discounted cash flow model that incorporates an estimated “royalty rate”"royalty rate" we would be able to charge a third party for the use of the particular brand. When determining the future cash flow estimates, we must estimate future net sales and a fair market royalty rate for each applicable brand and an appropriate discount rate to measure the present value of the anticipated cash flows.


Estimating future net sales requires significant judgment by management in such areas as future economic conditions, product pricing, and consumer trends. In determining an appropriate discount rate to apply to the estimated future cash flows, we consider the current interest rate environment and our estimated cost of capital.
In fiscal 2015, we elected to perform a quantitative impairment test for indefinite lived intangibles. During fiscal 2015, we recognized impairment charges of $43.7 million in our Private Brands segment to write-down various brands. We also recognized impairment charges of $4.8 million in our Consumer Foods segment for our Poppycock® brand and a $0.3 million impairment charge in our Commercial Foods segment for a small brand.
In fiscal 2014, we elected to perform a quantitative impairment test for indefinite lived intangibles. We recognized impairment charges of $72.5 million in our Consumer Foods segment, primarily for our Chef Boyardee® brand, and a $3.2 million impairment charge in our Private Brands segment for two small brands. We also recognized a $3.2 million impairment charge for an amortizable technology license in our Corporate expenses in fiscal 2014.
Goodwill is tested annually for impairment of value and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may be impaired. A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred. Such indicators may include deterioration in general economic conditions, adverse changes in the markets in which an entity operates, increases in input costs that have negative effects on earnings and cash flows, or a trend of negative or declining cash flows over multiple periods, among others. The fair value that could be realized in an actual transaction may differ from that used to evaluate the impairment of goodwill.
In testing goodwill for impairment, we have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not (more than 50%) that the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we elect to perform a qualitative assessment and determine that an impairment is more likely than not, we are then required to perform a quantitative impairment test, otherwise no further analysis is required. We also may elect not to perform the qualitative assessment and, instead, proceed directly to the quantitative impairment test.
Under the qualitative assessment, various events and circumstances that would affect the estimated fair value of a reporting unit are identified (similar to impairment indicators above). Furthermore, management considers the results of the most recent two-step quantitative impairment test completed for a reporting unit and compares the weighted average cost of capital between the current and prior years for each reporting unit.
Under the two-step quantitative impairment test, the first step of the evaluation involves comparing the current fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. Fair value is typically estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, which requires us to estimate the future cash flows anticipated to be generated by the reporting unit being tested for impairment as well as to select a risk-adjusted discount rate to measure the present value of the anticipated cash flows. When determining future cash flow estimates, we consider historical results adjusted to reflect current and anticipated operating conditions. We estimate cash flows for the reporting unit over a discrete period (typically four or five years) and the terminal period (considering expected long term growth rates and trends). Estimating future cash flows requires significant judgment by management in such areas as future economic conditions, industry-specific conditions, product pricing, and necessary capital expenditures. The use of different assumptions or estimates for future cash flows or significant changes in risk-adjusted discountsdiscount rates due to changes in market conditions could produce substantially different estimates of the fair value of the reporting unit.
IfPrior to the fairfourth quarter of fiscal 2017, if the carrying value of a reporting unit determined in the firstexceeded its fair value, we completed a second step of the evaluation is lower than its carrying value, we proceedtest to determine the amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any, to be recognized. In the second step, which compares the carrying value of goodwill to its implied fair value. In estimating thewe estimated an implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill for a reporting unit, we must assignby allocating the fair value of the reporting unit (as determined in the first step) to all of the assets and liabilities associated withother than goodwill (including any unrecognized intangible assets). The impairment loss was equal to the reporting unit as ifexcess of the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination (i.e., we estimatecarrying value of the goodwill over the implied fair value of each asset and liability heldthat goodwill. As a result of adopting Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, beginning in the reporting unit). The various assets and liabilities withinfourth quarter of fiscal 2017, if the carrying value of a reporting unit are generally not adjusted to their new, estimatedexceeds its fair values (unless impairments of any individual assets are indicated). The implied goodwill isvalue, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the residual ofdifference between the carrying value and estimated fair value of the reporting unit over the estimated fair values of each identifiable asset and liability within the reporting unit. Any excess of the carrying value of goodwill of the reporting unit over its implied fair value is recorded as impairment.

36



In the fourthfirst quarter of fiscal 2015,2017, in conjunctionanticipation of the Spinoff, we changed our reporting segments. In accordance with our annual reviewapplicable accounting guidance, we were required to determine new reporting units at a lower level (at the operating segment or one level lower, as applicable). When such a determination was made, we were required to perform a goodwill impairment analysis for impairment, weeach of the old and new reporting units.
We performed a qualitative analysisan assessment of impairment of goodwill for the new Canadian reporting units in our Consumer Foods and Commercial Foods segments. The results ofunit within the qualitative analysis did not result in further testing of impairment.
Because forecasted sales and profits for the Private Brands segment continued to fall below our expectations relative to our previous projections throughout fiscal 2015, we performed quantitative analyses of goodwill on certain of our Private Brands segmentnew International reporting units in the second, third, and fourth quarters of fiscal 2015.segment. Estimating the fair value of individual reporting units requires us to make assumptions and estimates regarding our future plans and future industry and economic conditions. We estimated the future cash flows of eachthe Canadian reporting unit within the Private Brands segment and calculated the net present value of those estimated cash flows using a risk adjusted discount rate in order to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit from the perspective of a market participant. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of 8%7.5% and 3%2%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We then compared the estimated fair value of eachthe reporting unit to the respective historical carrying value (including allocated assets and liabilities of certain shared and Corporate functions), and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than the carrying value for sixin the first quarter of our reporting units within the Private Brands segment throughout fiscal 2015.2017. With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the assets and liabilities of each of thesethis reporting unitsunit in order to determine the implied fair value of goodwill of each reporting unit.goodwill. We recognized an impairment chargescharge for the difference between the implied fair value of goodwill and the carrying value of goodwill within each reporting unit atgoodwill. Accordingly,


during the respective measurement dates. Accordingly, duringfirst quarter of fiscal 2015,2017, we recorded charges totaling $1.53 billion$139.2 million for the impairment of goodwill. The remaining goodwill inbalance of the Private Brands segment. The followingCanadian reporting unitsunit as of May 27, 2018 was $37.6 million.
As part of the assessment of the fair value of each asset and liability within Private Brands were impacted: $328.7the Canadian reporting unit, with the assistance of the third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of a Canadian brand to be less than its carrying value. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, we recognized an impairment charge of $24.4 million in Bars and Coordinated, $195.1 million in Cereal, $157.1 million in Pasta, $536.5 million in Snacks, $174.4 million in Retail Bakery, and $136.1 million in Condiments.to write down the intangible asset to its estimated fair value.
During fiscal 2014, we recorded a $602.2 million charge for theWe also performed an assessment of impairment of goodwill infor the Private Brands segment. The followingnew Mexican reporting units within Private Brands were impacted: $66.4 million in Bars and Coordinated, $154.6 million in Cereal, $94.2 million in Pasta, $231.6 million in Snacks, and $55.4 million in Retail Bakery.
In the case of four reporting unitsunit within the Private Brands segment: Cereal, Pasta, Snacks,International reporting segment using similar methods to those described above. We used discount rates and Retail Bakery,terminal growth rates of 8.5% and 3%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We determined that the estimated fair value of this reporting unit exceeded the carrying value of its net assets by approximately 5%. Accordingly, we did not recognize an impairment of the goodwill in the Mexican reporting unit.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2017, as a result of further deterioration in forecasted sales and profits primarily due to foreign exchange rates, we performed an additional assessment of impairment of goodwill for the new Mexican reporting unit. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of 8.5% and 3%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We then compared the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the historical carrying value (including allocated assets and liabilities of certain amortizing intangible assets (customer relationships) used in step twoshared and Corporate functions), and determined that the fair value of our impairment analysisthe reporting unit was substantially less than the carrying value in the second quarter of thosefiscal 2017. With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the assets and as a result,liabilities of this reporting unit in order to determine the implied fair value of goodwill. We recognized an impairment charge for the difference between the implied fair value of goodwill and the carrying value of goodwill. Accordingly, during the Cereal, Pasta, Snacks, and Retail Bakery reporting units exceededsecond quarter of fiscal 2017, we recorded charges totaling $43.9 million for the estimated fair valuesimpairment of those reporting units, even after the previously described goodwill impairment charges were recorded. We assess the recoverability of these amortizing intangibles at the segment level and expect to recover the carrying value over their remaining lives (on an undiscounted basis) and, accordingly, no impairments were required to be recognized.goodwill.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015,2017, in conjunction with our annual impairment testing, we concluded that, dueadopted ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. As a result of further deterioration in forecasted sales and profits, we performed an additional assessment of impairment of goodwill for the new Mexican reporting unit. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of 9.0% and 3.0%, respectively, to a decline incalculate the present value of estimated future cash flows, thereflows. We then compared the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the historical carrying value (including allocated assets and liabilities of certain shared and Corporate functions), and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than the carrying value in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the reporting unit. We recognized an indicatorimpairment charge of $15.8 million, equal to the difference between the carrying value and estimated fair value of the reporting unit. The remaining goodwill balance of the Mexican reporting unit as of May 27, 2018 was $118.5 million.
In fiscal 2018, we elected to perform a quantitative impairment test for certain property, plant,indefinite lived intangibles. During fiscal 2018, we recognized impairment charges of $4.0 million for our HK Anderson®, Red Fork®, and equipment withinSalpica® brands in our Grocery & Snacks segment. We also recognized an impairment charge of $0.8 million for our Aylmer® brand in our International segment.
In fiscal 2017, we elected to perform a quantitative impairment test for indefinite lived intangibles. During fiscal 2017, we recognized impairment charges of $7.1 million for our Del Monte®brand and $5.5 million for our Aylmer® brand in our International segment. We also recognized impairment charges of $67.1 million for our Chef Boyardee® brand and $1.1 million for our Fiddle Faddle® brand in our Grocery & Snacks segment.
In fiscal 2016, we elected to perform a quantitative impairment test for indefinite lived intangibles. During fiscal 2016, we recognized impairment charges of $50.1 million in our Grocery & Snacks segment for our Chef Boyardee® brand.
We completed the divestiture of our Private Brands operations in the third quarter of fiscal 2016. In fiscal 2016, we recognized charges of $1.92 billion ($1.44 billion after-tax) to write-down the goodwill and long-lived assets of the Private Brands segment. As a result, we reviewed the long-lived assets for impairment and recorded a $13.7 million impairment charge within the Private Brands segment. The impairment was measured based upon an estimated disposal value for the related production facility.
Following the impairment charges recorded in fiscal 2015, the carrying value of goodwill in our Private Brands reporting units included $269.3 million for Cereal, $588.2 million for Pasta, $276.5 million for Snacks, and $535.5 million for Retail Bakery. All of the goodwill for the Bars and Coordinated and Condiments reporting units was impaired as of the end of fiscal 2015. If the future performance of one or more of the reporting units within the Private Brands segment falls short of our expectations or if there are significant changes in risk-adjusted discount rates due to changes in market conditions, we could be required to recognize additional, material impairment charges in future periods.business.


37



RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU")ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("U.S. GAAP").GAAP. On July 9, 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of the new revenue recognition standard by one year. The updated


standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Based on the FASB’sFASB's ASU, we will apply the new revenue standard in our fiscal year 2019. Entities will have the option to adopt the ASU using either the full retrospective or modified retrospective transition method. We have concluded our assessment of the new standard and will be adopting the provisions of the ASU utilizing the modified retrospective transition method. The adoption of ASU 2014-09 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The effective date for this standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017. We do not expect ASU 2016-01 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, Topic 842, which requires lessees to reflect most leases on their balance sheet as assets and obligations. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption in our fiscal year 2018 is permitted. We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The standard permitsis to be applied under the usemodified retrospective method, with elective reliefs, which requires application of either the retrospectivenew guidance for all periods presented.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which clarifies how companies present and classify certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We do not expect ASU 2016-15 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash, which provides amendments to current guidance to address the classifications and presentation of changes in restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We do not expect ASU 2016-18 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which provides a new framework for determining whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or cumulative effect transition method.businesses. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We do not expect ASU 2017-01 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Retirement Benefits: Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which requires companies to present the service cost component of net benefit cost in the same line items in which they report compensation cost. Companies will present all other components of net benefit cost outside a subtotal of operating income, if presented, or disclosed separately. Also, only the service cost component may be eligible for capitalization where applicable. The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the income statement and prospectively for the capitalization of service cost components. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We will adopt ASU 2017-07 in our fiscal 2019. The estimated impact is a reclassification of a benefit of $80.4 million, a benefit of $55.2 million, and a charge of $303.8 million to non-operating income (expense) for fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, which improves the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity's risk management activities in its financial statements and make certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance in current U.S. GAAP. The amendments in this update better align an entity's risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and presentation of hedge results. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We plan to early adopt this ASU at the beginning of our fiscal 2019. We do not expect ASU 2017-12 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report, including Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on management's current expectations and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. We undertake no responsibility for updating these statements. Readers of this report should understand that these statements are not guarantees of performance or results. Many factors could affect our actual financial results and cause them to vary materially from the expectations contained in the forward-looking statements, including those set forth in this report. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things: our ability to successfully execute an exit option for our Private Brands operations within the expected time frame or at all; our ability to realize the synergies and benefits contemplated by the Ardent Mills joint venture; risks and uncertainties associated with intangible assets, including any future goodwill or intangible assets impairment charges; the availability and prices of raw materials, including any negative effects caused by inflation or weather conditions; the effectiveness of our product pricing, including product innovation, any pricing actions and changes in promotional strategies; the ultimate outcome of litigation, including litigation related to the lead paint and pigment matters; future economic circumstances; industry conditions; the effectiveness of our hedging activities, including volatility in commodities that could impact our derivative positions and, in turn, our earnings; our ability to execute our operating and restructuring plans and achieve operating efficiencies; the success of our cost savings initiatives, innovation, and marketing investments; the competitive environment and related market conditions; the ultimate impact of any product recalls; access to capital; actions of governments and regulatory factors affecting our businesses, including the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; the amount and timing of repurchases of our common stock and debt, if any; the costs, disruption and diversion of management's attention associated with campaigns commenced by activist investors; and other risks described in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements included in this report, which speak only as of the date of this report.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The principal market risks affecting us during fiscal 20152018 and 20142017 were exposures to price fluctuations of commodity and energy inputs, interest rates, and foreign currencies. These fluctuations impacted all reporting segments.


Commodity Market Risk
We purchase commodity inputs such as wheat, corn, oats, soybean meal, soybean oil, meat, dairy products, nuts, sugar, natural gas, electricity, and packaging materials to be used in our operations. These commodities are subject to price fluctuations that may create price risk. We enter into commodity hedges to manage this price risk using physical forward contracts or derivative instruments. We have policies governing the hedging instruments our businesses may use. These policies include limiting the dollar risk exposure for each of our businesses. We also monitor the amount of associated counter-party credit risk for all non-exchange-traded transactions.
Interest Rate Risk
We may use interest rate swaps to manage the effect of interest rate changes on the fair value of our existing debt as well as the forecasted interest payments for the anticipated issuance of debt. During fiscal 2014, we entered into interest rate swap contracts to hedge the fair value of certain of our senior long-term debt instruments maturing in fiscal 2019 and 2020. During the third quarter of fiscal 2015, we terminated these interest rate swap contracts.

38



As of May 31, 201527, 2018 and May 25, 2014,28, 2017, the fair value of our long termlong-term debt (including current installments) was estimated at $8.3$3.76 billion and $9.5$3.32 billion, respectively, based on current market rates provided primarily by outside investment advisors.rates. As of May 31, 201527, 2018 and May 25, 2014,28, 2017, a 1% increase in interest rates would decrease the fair value of our long-termfixed rate debt by approximately $428.6$168.1 million and $553.9$197.8 million, respectively, while a 1% decrease in interest rates would increase the fair value of our long-termfixed rate debt by approximately $479.5$185.7 million and $627.4$219.4 million, respectively.
Foreign Currency Risk
In order to reduce exposures for our processing activities related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, we may enter into forward exchange or option contracts for transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency for certain of our operations. This activity primarily relates to economically hedging against foreign currency risk in purchasing inventory and capital equipment, sales of finished goods, and future settlement of foreign denominated assets and liabilities.
Value-at-Risk (VaR)
We employ various tools to monitor our derivative risk, including value-at-risk ("VaR") models. We perform simulations using historical data to estimate potential losses in the fair value of current derivative positions. We use price and volatility information for the prior 90 days in the calculation of VaR that is used to monitor our daily risk. The purpose of this measurement is to provide a single view of the potential risk of loss associated with derivative positions at a given point in time based on recent changes in market prices. Our model uses a 95% confidence level. Accordingly, in any given one day time period, losses greater than the amounts included in the table below are expected to occur only 5% of the time. We include commodity swaps, futures, and options and foreign exchange forwards, swaps, and options in this calculation. The following table provides an overview of our average daily VaR for our energy, agriculture, and foreign exchange and other commoditiespositions (including discontinued operations) for fiscal years 20152018 and 2014. Other commodities below consist primarily of forward and option contracts for a commodities index which includes items such as agricultural commodities, energy commodities, and metals. The other commodities category below may also include items such as packaging and/or livestock.2017.
Fair Value ImpactFair Value Impact
In Millions
Average
During the Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 2015
 
Average
During the Fiscal Year Ended May 25, 2014
Average
During the Fiscal Year Ended May 27, 2018
 
Average
During the Fiscal Year Ended May 28, 2017
Processing Activities      
Energy commodities$1.2
 $1.1
$0.2
 $0.4
Agriculture commodities2.7
 1.9
0.4
 0.5
Other commodities1.4
 2.5
Foreign exchange0.1
 1.3
0.7
 0.3

39




ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ConAgra Foods,Conagra Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in millions, except per share amounts)

For the Fiscal Years Ended MayFor the Fiscal Years Ended May
2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Net sales$15,832.4
 $15,843.6
 $13,469.3
$7,938.3
 $7,826.9
 $8,664.1
Costs and expenses:          
Cost of goods sold12,523.9
 12,331.7
 10,104.4
5,586.8
 5,484.8
 6,234.9
Selling, general and administrative expenses3,472.1
 2,771.2
 2,065.9
1,318.0
 1,417.1
 2,024.6
Interest expense, net331.9
 379.4
 276.2
158.7
 195.5
 295.8
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity method investment earnings(495.5) 361.3
 1,022.8
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity method investment earnings874.8
 729.5
 108.8
Income tax expense234.0
 220.1
 361.9
174.6
 254.7
 46.4
Equity method investment earnings122.1
 32.5
 37.5
97.3
 71.2
 66.1
Income (loss) from continuing operations(607.4) 173.7
 698.4
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax366.6
 141.4
 87.7
Income from continuing operations797.5
 546.0
 128.5
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax14.3
 102.0
 (794.4)
Net income (loss)$(240.8) $315.1
 $786.1
$811.8
 $648.0
 $(665.9)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests11.8
 12.0
 12.2
3.4
 8.7
 11.1
Net income (loss) attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc.$(252.6) $303.1
 $773.9
Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.$808.4
 $639.3
 $(677.0)
Earnings (loss) per share — basic          
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders$(1.46) $0.38
 $1.67
Income from discontinued operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders0.86
 0.34
 0.21
Net income (loss) attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders$(0.60) $0.72
 $1.88
Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders$1.97
 $1.26
 $0.29
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders0.03
 0.22
 (1.86)
Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders$2.00
 $1.48
 $(1.57)
Earnings (loss) per share — diluted          
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders$(1.46) $0.37
 $1.64
Income from discontinued operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders0.86
 0.33
 0.21
Net income (loss) attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders$(0.60) $0.70
 $1.85
Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders$1.95
 $1.25
 $0.29
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders0.03
 0.21
 (1.85)
Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders$1.98
 $1.46
 $(1.56)
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


40




ConAgra Foods,Conagra Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(in millions)

For the Fiscal Years Ended MayFor the Fiscal Years Ended May
2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Pre-Tax AmountTax (Expense) BenefitAfter-Tax Amount Pre-Tax AmountTax (Expense) BenefitAfter-Tax Amount Pre-Tax AmountTax (Expense) BenefitAfter-Tax AmountPre-Tax AmountTax (Expense) BenefitAfter-Tax Amount Pre-Tax AmountTax (Expense) BenefitAfter-Tax Amount Pre-Tax AmountTax (Expense) BenefitAfter-Tax Amount
Net income (loss)$(725.6)$484.8
$(240.8) $617.9
$(302.8)$315.1
 $1,186.3
$(400.2)$786.1
$972.3
$(160.5)$811.8
 $989.2
$(341.2)$648.0
 $(1,033.6)$367.7
$(665.9)
Other comprehensive income (loss):          
Derivative adjustments:          
Unrealized derivative adjustments


 49.6
(18.3)31.3
 51.7
(19.2)32.5
2.9
(0.9)2.0
 (1.0)0.4
(0.6) 


Reclassification for derivative adjustments included in net income(0.5)0.2
(0.3) 55.0
(20.6)34.4
 0.4
(0.1)0.3
0.1

0.1
 (0.2)0.1
(0.1) (2.1)0.8
(1.3)
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities0.7
(0.3)0.4
 0.2
(0.1)0.1
 0.3
(0.1)0.2
1.1
(0.3)0.8
 0.5
(0.2)0.3
 0.1

0.1
Currency translation adjustment:     
Unrealized currency translation gains (losses)(145.2)
(145.2) (25.7)
(25.7) 2.1

2.1
0.8
(0.1)0.7
 (13.6)0.2
(13.4) (58.9)
(58.9)
Reclassification for currency translation losses included in net income


 


 73.4

73.4
Pension and post-employment benefit obligations:          
Unrealized pension and post-employment benefit obligations(94.9)36.7
(58.2) 23.8
(8.2)15.6
 103.8
(40.0)63.8
157.3
(45.0)112.3
 209.2
(80.6)128.6
 (37.7)14.8
(22.9)
Reclassification for pension and post-employment benefit obligations included in net income0.8
(0.3)0.5
 3.3
(1.2)2.1
 5.4
(2.0)3.4
0.9
(0.2)0.7
 10.4
(4.0)6.4
 (14.5)4.9
(9.6)
Comprehensive income (loss)(964.7)521.1
(443.6) 724.1
(351.2)372.9
 1,350.0
(461.6)888.4
1,135.4
(207.0)928.4
 1,194.5
(425.3)769.2
 (1,073.3)388.2
(685.1)
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests4.6
(0.4)4.2
 8.9
(0.9)8.0
 13.1
(1.6)11.5
0.7
(1.2)(0.5) 12.6
(0.7)11.9
 7.8
(0.9)6.9
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc.$(969.3)$521.5
$(447.8) $715.2
$(350.3)$364.9
 $1,336.9
$(460.0)$876.9
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.$1,134.7
$(205.8)$928.9
 $1,181.9
$(424.6)$757.3
 $(1,081.1)$389.1
$(692.0)
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



41




ConAgra Foods,Conagra Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in millions, except share data)
May 31,
2015
 May 25,
2014
May 27,
2018
 May 28,
2017
ASSETS      
Current assets      
Cash and cash equivalents$183.1
 $141.3
$128.0
 $251.4
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $4.6 and $4.0972.9
 1,058.4
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2.0 and $3.1582.6
 563.4
Inventories2,201.2
 2,077.0
997.1
 927.9
Prepaid expenses and other current assets310.5
 322.4
186.8
 228.7
Current assets held for sale
 631.7
44.4
 41.8
Total current assets3,667.7
 4,230.8
1,938.9
 2,013.2
Property, plant and equipment      
Land and land improvements190.5
 218.4
108.6
 103.2
Buildings, machinery and equipment6,031.7
 5,625.8
3,238.8
 3,140.9
Furniture, fixtures, office equipment and other898.2
 902.4
628.9
 724.2
Construction in progress318.1
 362.2
85.9
 124.9
7,438.5
 7,108.8
4,062.2
 4,093.2
Less accumulated depreciation(3,830.4) (3,472.8)(2,442.1) (2,460.1)
Property, plant and equipment, net3,608.1
 3,636.0
1,620.1
 1,633.1
Goodwill6,300.3
 7,828.5
4,502.5
 4,295.3
Brands, trademarks and other intangibles, net3,030.0
 3,204.9
1,284.5
 1,223.7
Other assets936.1
 220.4
906.3
 790.6
Noncurrent assets held for sale
 198.9
137.2
 140.4
$17,542.2
 $19,319.5
$10,389.5
 $10,096.3
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY   
Current liabilities      
Notes payable$7.9
 $141.8
$277.3
 $28.2
Current installments of long-term debt1,008.0
 84.1
307.0
 199.0
Accounts payable1,358.3
 1,349.3
915.1
 773.1
Accrued payroll218.2
 154.3
163.9
 167.6
Other accrued liabilities717.8
 748.1
672.9
 552.6
Current liabilities held for sale
 164.8
Total current liabilities3,310.2
 2,642.4
2,336.2
 1,720.5
Senior long-term debt, excluding current installments6,693.0
 8,524.6
3,035.6
 2,573.3
Subordinated debt195.9
 195.9
195.9
 195.9
Other noncurrent liabilities2,733.1
 2,599.4
1,065.2
 1,528.8
Noncurrent liabilities held for sale
 2.0
Total liabilities12,932.2
 13,964.3
6,632.9
 6,018.5
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)
 

 
Common stockholders' equity      
Common stock of $5 par value, authorized 1,200,000,000 shares; issued 567,907,1722,839.7
 2,839.7
2,839.7
 2,839.7
Additional paid-in capital1,049.4
 1,036.9
1,180.0
 1,171.9
Retained earnings4,331.1
 5,010.6
4,744.9
 4,247.0
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(329.5) (134.3)(110.5) (212.9)
Less treasury stock, at cost, 139,702,605 and 145,992,121 common shares(3,364.7) (3,494.4)
Total ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders' equity4,526.0
 5,258.5
Less treasury stock, at cost, 177,078,193 and 151,387,209 common shares(4,977.9) (4,054.9)
Total Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders' equity3,676.2
 3,990.8
Noncontrolling interests84.0
 96.7
80.4
 87.0
Total stockholders' equity4,610.0
 5,355.2
3,756.6
 4,077.8
$17,542.2
 $19,319.5
$10,389.5
 $10,096.3
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

42




ConAgra Foods,Conagra Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Common Stockholders' Equity
(in millions, except share data)millions)
 ConAgra Foods, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity   Conagra Brands, Inc. Stockholders' Equity    
 
Common
Shares
 
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Noncontrolling
Interests
 
Total
Equity
 
Common
Shares
 
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Noncontrolling
Interests
 
Total
Equity
Balance at May 27, 2012 567.9
 $2,839.7
 $901.5
 $4,765.1
 $(299.1) $(3,767.7) $96.5
 $4,536.0
Balance at May 31, 2015 567.9
 $2,839.7
 $1,049.4
 $4,331.1
 $(329.5) $(3,364.7) $84.0
 $4,610.0
Stock option and incentive plans 

 

 56.2
 (2.2)   278.7
   332.7
     91.7
 (1.2)   228.5
   319.0
Currency translation adjustment         2.8
   (0.7) 2.1
         18.7
   (4.2) 14.5
Issuance of treasury shares     50.1
     219.1
   269.2
Unrealized gain on securities         0.1
     0.1
Derivative adjustment, net of reclassification adjustment         (1.3)     (1.3)
Activities of noncontrolling interests     (4.8)       1.4
 (3.4)
Pension and postretirement healthcare benefits         (32.5)     (32.5)
Dividends declared on common stock; $1.00 per share       (434.6)       (434.6)
Net loss attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.       (677.0)       (677.0)
Balance at May 29, 2016 567.9
 2,839.7
 1,136.3
 3,218.3
 (344.5) (3,136.2) 81.2
 3,794.8
Stock option and incentive plans     36.4
 (1.3)   81.3
   116.4
Adoption of ASU 2016-09       (3.9)       (3.9)
Spinoff of Lamb Weston       783.3
 13.6
     796.9
Currency translation adjustment, net         (16.6)   3.2
 (13.4)
Repurchase of common shares         

 (245.0)   (245.0)           (1,000.0)   (1,000.0)
Unrealized gain on securities         0.2
     0.2
         0.3
     0.3
Derivative adjustment, net of reclassification adjustment         32.8
   

 32.8
         (0.7)     (0.7)
Activities of noncontrolling interests     (1.6)       2.8
 1.2
     (0.8)       2.6
 1.8
Pension and postretirement healthcare benefits         67.2
     67.2
         135.0
     135.0
Dividends declared on common stock; $0.99 per share       (407.3)       (407.3)
Net income attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc.       773.9
       773.9
Balance at May 26, 2013 567.9
 2,839.7
 1,006.2
 5,129.5
 (196.1) (3,514.9) 98.6
 5,363.0
Dividends declared on common stock; $0.90 per share       (388.7)       (388.7)
Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.       639.3
       639.3
Balance at May 28, 2017 567.9
 2,839.7
 1,171.9
 4,247.0
 (212.9) (4,054.9) 87.0
 4,077.8
Stock option and incentive plans     32.4
 (0.8)   120.5
   152.1
     10.0
 (0.8)   44.3
 0.2
 53.7
Currency translation adjustment         (21.7)   (4.0) (25.7)
Spinoff of Lamb Weston       14.8
       14.8
Adoption of ASU 2018-02       17.4
 (17.4)     
Currency translation adjustment, net         4.6
   (3.9) 0.7
Repurchase of common shares           (100.0)   (100.0)           (967.3)   (967.3)
Unrealized gain on securities         0.1
     0.1
         0.8
     0.8
Derivative adjustment, net of reclassification adjustment         65.7
     65.7
         2.1
     2.1
Activities of noncontrolling interests     (1.7)       2.1
 0.4
     (1.9)   (0.7)   (2.9) (5.5)
Pension and postretirement healthcare benefits         17.7
     17.7
         113.0
     113.0
Dividends declared on common stock; $1.00 per share       (421.2)       (421.2)
Net income attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc.       303.1
       303.1
Balance at May 25, 2014 567.9
 2,839.7
 1,036.9
 5,010.6
 (134.3) (3,494.4) 96.7
 5,355.2
Stock option and incentive plans     14.2
 (0.4)   179.7
   193.5
Currency translation adjustment         (137.6)   (7.6) (145.2)
Repurchase of common shares           (50.0)   (50.0)
Unrealized gain on securities         0.4
     0.4
Derivative adjustment, net of reclassification adjustment         (0.3)     (0.3)
Activities of noncontrolling interests     (1.7)       (5.1) (6.8)
Pension and postretirement healthcare benefits         (57.7)     (57.7)
Dividends declared on common stock; $1.00 per share       (426.5)       (426.5)
Net loss attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc.       (252.6)       (252.6)
Balance at May 31, 2015 567.9
 $2,839.7
 $1,049.4
 $4,331.1
 $(329.5) $(3,364.7) $84.0
 $4,610.0
Dividends declared on common stock; $0.85 per share       (341.9)       (341.9)
Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.       808.4
       808.4
Balance at May 27, 2018 567.9
 $2,839.7
 $1,180.0
 $4,744.9
 $(110.5) $(4,977.9) $80.4
 $3,756.6
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
43




ConAgra Foods,Conagra Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in millions)
For the Fiscal Years Ended MayFor the Fiscal Years Ended May
2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:          
Net income (loss)$(240.8) $315.1
 $786.1
$811.8
 $648.0
 $(665.9)
Income from discontinued operations366.6
 141.4
 87.7
Income (loss) from continuing operations(607.4) 173.7
 698.4
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) from continuing operations to net cash flows from operating activities:     
Income (loss) from discontinued operations14.3
 102.0
 (794.4)
Income from continuing operations797.5
 546.0
 128.5
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash flows from operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization592.3
 577.3
 418.6
257.0
 268.0
 278.5
Asset impairment charges1,615.3
 720.0
 20.2
14.7
 343.3
 62.6
Loss on sale of fixed assets14.3
 5.1
 10.5
Earnings of affiliates less than (in excess of) distributions(30.8) 13.6
 (11.7)
Share-based payments expense68.3
 59.5
 67.0
Gain on divestitures
 (197.4) 
Lease cancellation expense48.2
 
 55.6
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 93.3
 23.9
Significant litigation accruals151.0
 
 
Earnings of affiliates in excess of distributions(34.8) (3.0) (25.7)
Stock-settled share-based payments expense37.9
 36.1
 41.8
Contributions to pension plans(13.5) (18.3) (19.8)(312.6) (163.0) (11.5)
Pension expense(6.0) (5.9) 23.5
Pension expense (benefit)(56.1) (21.4) 358.1
Other items11.7
 (36.3) (9.2)(34.0) 39.9
 53.6
Change in operating assets and liabilities excluding effects of business acquisitions and dispositions:          
Receivables93.8
 48.8
 (52.2)(4.7) 104.7
 (156.8)
Inventories(119.8) 12.5
 56.1
(62.8) 123.3
 66.1
Deferred income taxes and income taxes payable, net(102.0) 50.5
 126.4
10.5
 52.3
 (264.9)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets(9.3) 1.5
 (13.3)3.2
 15.0
 10.8
Accounts payable(15.9) 25.4
 18.3
144.9
 71.0
 (118.3)
Accrued payroll70.5
 (126.0) 104.2
(8.0) (52.4) 68.9
Other accrued liabilities(87.8) (46.8) (66.7)(32.2) (114.9) 54.3
Net cash flows from operating activities - continuing operations1,473.7
 1,454.6
 1,370.3
919.7
 1,140.8
 625.5
Net cash flows from operating activities - discontinued operations6.9
 114.0
 41.9
34.5
 34.7
 633.7
Net cash flows from operating activities1,480.6
 1,568.6
 1,412.2
954.2
 1,175.5
 1,259.2
Cash flows from investing activities:          
Additions to property, plant and equipment(471.9) (592.3) (422.6)(251.6) (242.1) (277.5)
Sale of property, plant and equipment20.6
 42.5
 18.0
8.0
 13.2
 35.7
Purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired(95.7) (39.9) (5,018.8)
Purchase of intangible assets
 
 (4.8)
Return of investment in equity method investee391.4
 
 
Investment in equity method investee
 
 (1.5)
Proceeds from divestitures
 489.0
 
Purchase of business and intangible assets(337.1) (325.7) (10.4)
Other items4.5
 
 0.3
Net cash flows from investing activities - continuing operations(155.6) (589.7) (5,429.7)(576.2) (65.6) (251.9)
Net cash flows from investing activities - discontinued operations114.0
 58.2
 (36.1)
 (123.7) 2,379.3
Net cash flows from investing activities(41.6) (531.5) (5,465.8)(576.2) (189.3) 2,127.4
Cash flows from financing activities:          
Net short-term borrowings(150.0) (43.2) 145.0
249.1
 14.3
 9.5
Issuance of long-term debt550.0
 
 6,217.7
Debt issuance costs(2.3) 
 (56.6)
Issuance of long-term debt, net of debt issuance costs797.0
 
 
Repayment of long-term debt(1,495.2) (569.2) (2,074.0)(242.3) (1,064.5) (2,523.2)
Issuance of ConAgra Foods, Inc. common shares
 
 269.2
Repurchase of ConAgra Foods, Inc. common shares(50.0) (100.0) (245.0)
Payment of intangible asset financing arrangement(14.4) (14.9) 
Repurchase of Conagra Brands, Inc. common shares(967.3) (1,000.0) 
Sale of Conagra Brands, Inc. common shares
 
 8.6
Cash dividends paid(425.2) (420.9) (400.7)(342.3) (415.0) (432.5)
Exercise of stock options and issuance of other stock awards153.8
 103.7
 274.4
Exercise of stock options and issuance of other stock awards, including tax withholdings14.9
 73.8
 208.4
Other items(11.3) (4.5) 3.0
(1.6) (1.9) 
Net cash flows from financing activities - continuing operations(1,430.2) (1,034.1) 4,133.0
(506.9) (2,408.2) (2,729.2)
Net cash flows from financing activities - discontinued operations
 
 

 839.1
 (4.0)
Net cash flows from financing activities(1,430.2) (1,034.1) 4,133.0
(506.9) (1,569.1) (2,733.2)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(8.8) (3.8) 1.5
5.5
 (0.2) (2.0)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
 (0.8) 80.9
(123.4) (583.1) 651.4
Add: Cash balance included in assets held for sale at beginning of period41.8
 33.0
 17.1
Less: Cash balance included in assets held for sale at end of period
 41.8
 33.0
Add: Cash balance included in assets held for sale and discontinued operations at beginning of period
 36.4
 49.0
Less: Cash balance included in assets held for sale and discontinued operations at end of period
 
 36.4
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year141.3
 150.9
 85.9
251.4
 798.1
 134.1
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$183.1
 $141.3
 $150.9
$128.0
 $251.4
 $798.1
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

44




Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015,27, 2018, May 25, 2014,28, 2017, and May 26, 201329, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Fiscal Year — The fiscal year of ConAgra Foods,Conagra Brands, Inc. (“ConAgra Foods”("Conagra Brands", “Company”"Company", “we”"we", “us”"us", or “our”"our") ends the last Sunday in May. The fiscal years for the consolidated financial statements presented consist of a 53-week period for fiscal year 2015 and 52-week periods for fiscal years 20142018, 2017, and 2013.2016.
Basis of Consolidation — The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ConAgra Foods,Conagra Brands, Inc. and all majority-owned subsidiaries. In addition, the accounts of all variable interest entities for which we have been determined to be the primary beneficiary are included in our consolidated financial statements from the date such determination is made. All significant intercompany investments, accounts, and transactions have been eliminated.
On November 9, 2016, we completed the spinoff of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. ("Lamb Weston") through a distribution of 100% of our interest in Lamb Weston to holders of shares of our common stock as of November 1, 2016 (the "Spinoff"). In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP"), the results of operations of the Lamb Weston operations are presented as discontinued operations and, as such, have been excluded from continuing operations and segment results for all periods presented (see Note 6 for additional discussion).
Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates — The investments in, and the operating results of, 50%-or-less-owned entities not required to be consolidated are included in the consolidated financial statements on the basis of the equity method of accounting or the cost method of accounting, depending on specific facts and circumstances.
We review our investments in unconsolidated affiliates for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investments may not be fully recoverable. Evidence of a loss in value that is other than temporary includes, but is not limited to, the absence of an ability to recover the carrying amount of the investment, the inability of the investee to sustain an earnings capacity which would justify the carrying amount of the investment, or, where applicable, estimated sales proceeds which are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of the investment. Management’sManagement's assessment as to whether any decline in value is other than temporary is based on our ability and intent to hold the investment and whether evidence indicating the carrying value of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time outweighs evidence to the contrary. Management generally considers our investments in equity method investees to be strategic long-term investments. Therefore, management completes its assessments with a long-term viewpoint. If the fair value of the investment is determined to be less than the carrying value and the decline in value is considered to be other than temporary, an appropriate write-down is recorded based on the excess of the carrying value over the best estimate of fair value of the investment.
Cash and Cash Equivalents — Cash and all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition, including short-term time deposits and government agency and corporate obligations, are classified as cash and cash equivalents.
Receivables — Receivables from customers generally do not bear interest. Terms and collection vary by location and channel. The allowance for doubtful accounts represents our estimate of probable non-payments and credit losses in our existing receivables, as determined based on a review of past due balances and other specific account data. Account balances are written off against the allowance when we deem them uncollectible.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The following table details the balances of our allowance for doubtful accounts and changes therein:
  
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 
Additions
Charged
to Costs  and
Expenses
 Other 
Deductions
from
Reserves
 
Balance at
Close of
Period
Year ended May 27, 2018 $3.1
 0.8
 
 1.9
(2) 
$2.0
Year ended May 28, 2017 $3.2
 1.0
 
 1.1
(2) 
$3.1
Year ended May 29, 2016 $3.0
 1.1
 (0.1)
(1) 
0.8
(2) 
$3.2
(1)
Primarily translation incurred during fiscal 2016.
(2)
Bad debts charged off and adjustments to previous reserves, less recoveries.
Inventories — We use the lower of cost (determined using the first-in, first-out method) or market for valuing inventories.
Property, Plant and Equipment — Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation has been calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective classes of assets as follows:
   
Land improvements  1 - 40 years 
Buildings  15 - 40 years
Machinery and equipment  3 - 20 years 
Furniture, fixtures, office equipment and other  5 - 15 years 
We review property, plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability of an asset considered “held-and-used”"held-and-used" is determined by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated from the use of the asset. If the carrying amount is greater than the undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset, the asset’sasset's carrying amount is reduced to its estimated fair value. An asset considered “held-for-sale”"held-for-sale" is reported at the lower of the asset’sasset's carrying amount or fair value. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, we concluded that, due to a decline in estimated future cash flows, there was in indicator of impairment for certain property, plant, and equipment within the Private Brands reporting segment. As a result, we reviewed the long-lived assets for impairment and recorded a $13.7 million

45

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

impairment charge within the Private Brands reporting segment. The impairment was measured based upon an estimated disposal value for the related production facility.
Goodwill and Other Identifiable Intangible Assets — Goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives (e.g., brands or trademarks) are not amortized and are tested annually for impairment of value and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may be impaired. A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred. Such indicators may include deterioration in general economic conditions, adverse changes in the markets in which an entity operates, increases in input costs that have negative effects on earnings and cash flows, or a trend of negative or declining cash flows over multiple periods, among others. The fair value that could be realized in an actual transaction may differ from that used to evaluate the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets.
In testing goodwill for impairment, we have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not (more than 50%) that the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we elect to perform a qualitative assessment and determine that an impairment is more likely than not, we are then required to perform a quantitative impairment test, otherwise no further analysis is required. We also may elect not to perform the qualitative assessment and, instead, proceed directly to the quantitative impairment test.
Under the goodwill qualitative assessment, various events and circumstances that would affect the estimated fair value of a reporting unit are identified (similar to impairment indicators above). Furthermore, management considers the results of the most recent two-step quantitative impairment test completed for a reporting unit and compares the weighted average cost of capital between the current and prior years for each reporting unit.
Under the goodwill two-step quantitative impairment test, the evaluation of impairment involves comparing the current fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. The first step of the test compares the carrying value of a reporting unit, including goodwill, with its fair value. We estimate the fair value using level 3 inputs as defined by the fair value hierarchy. Refer to Note 20 for the definition of the levels in the fair value hierarchy. The inputs used to calculate

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

the fair value include a number of subjective factors, such as estimates of future cash flows, estimates of our future cost structure, discount rates for our estimated cash flows, required level of working capital, assumed terminal value, and time horizon of cash flow forecasts. IfPrior to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceedsexceeded its fair value, we complete thecompleted a second step of the test to determine the amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any, to be recognized. In the second step, we estimateestimated an implied fair value of the reporting unit’sunit's goodwill by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities other than goodwill (including any unrecognized intangible assets). The impairment loss iswas equal to the excess of the carrying value of the goodwill over the implied fair value of that goodwill.
In Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, in conjunction with our annual review for2017, if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we recognize an impairment we performed a qualitative analysis of goodwill forloss equal to the reporting units in our Consumer Foodsdifference between the carrying value and Commercial Foods segments. The results of the qualitative analysis did not result in further testing of impairment.
Because sales and profits for Private Brands continued to fall below our expectations throughout fiscal 2015 and following preparation of plans for the business for fiscal 2016, we performed quantitative analyses of goodwill on certain of our Private Brands segment reporting units in the second, third, and fourth quarters of fiscal 2015. Estimating theestimated fair value of individualthe reporting units requires us to make assumptions and estimates regarding our future plans, industry and economic conditions. Refer to Note 9 for the details of the impairment charges in fiscal 2015.unit.
In assessing other intangible assets not subject to amortization for impairment, we have the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of such an intangible asset is less than its carrying amount. If we determine that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of such an intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, then we are not required to perform any additional tests for assessing intangible assets for impairment. However, if we conclude otherwise or elect not to perform the qualitative assessment, then we are required to perform a quantitative impairment test that involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
In fiscal 2015,2018, 2017, and 2016 we elected to perform a quantitative impairment test for other intangible assets not subject to amortization. The estimates of fair value of intangible assets not subject to amortization are determined using a “relief"relief from royalty”

46

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

royalty" methodology, which is used in estimating the fair value of our brands/trademarks. Discount rate assumptions are based on an assessment of the risk inherent in the projected future cash flows generated by the respective intangible assets. Also subject to judgment are assumptions about royalty rates. Refer to Note 9 for the details of the impairment charges in fiscal 2015.
Identifiable intangible assets with definite lives (e.g., licensing arrangements with contractual lives or customer relationships) are amortized over their estimated useful lives and tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may be impaired. Identifiable intangible assets with definite lives are evaluated for impairment using a process similar to that used in evaluating elements of property, plant and equipment. If impaired, the asset is written down to its fair value.
Refer to Note 9 for discussion of the impairment charges related to goodwill and intangible assets in fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments — Unless otherwise specified, we believe the carrying value of financial instruments approximates their fair value.
Environmental Liabilities — Environmental liabilities are accrued when it is probable that obligations have been incurred and the associated amounts can be reasonably estimated. We use third-party specialists to assist management in appropriately measuring the obligations associated with environmental liabilities. Such liabilities are adjusted as new information develops or circumstances change. We do not discount our environmental liabilities as the timing of the anticipated cash payments is not fixed or readily determinable. Management’sManagement's estimate of our potential liability is independent of any potential recovery of insurance proceeds or indemnification arrangements. We do not reduce our environmental liabilities for potential insurance recoveries. In fiscal 2013, we made an adjustment to the reserve of $4.5 million to increase our estimate based on expected payments.
Employment-Related Benefits — Employment-related benefits associated with pensions, postretirement health care benefits, and workers’workers' compensation are expensed as such obligations are incurred. The recognition of expense is impacted by estimates made by management, such as discount rates used to value these liabilities, future health care costs, and employee accidents incurred but not yet reported. We use third-party specialists to assist management in appropriately measuring the obligations associated with employment-related benefits.
We recognize changes in the fair value of pension plan assets and net actuarial gains or losses in excess of 10% of the greater of the market-related value of plan assets or the plan’splan's projected benefit obligation (“the corridor”(the "corridor") in current period expense annually as of our measurement date, which is our fiscal year-end, or when measurement is required otherwise under generally accepted accounting principles. In October 2014, The Society of Actuaries' Retirement Plan Experience Committee published new mortality tables

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and recommended their use for the measurement of U.S. pension plan obligations. With the assistance of our third-party actuary,May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in measuring our pension obligations as of May 31, 2015, we incorporated revised assumptions that generally reflect the mortality improvement inherent in these new tables, as adjusted for experience specific to our industry.millions except per share amounts)

Revenue Recognition — Revenue is recognized when title and risk of loss are transferred to customers upon delivery based on terms of sale and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is recognized as the net amount to be received after deducting estimated amounts for discounts, trade allowances, and returns of damaged and out-of-date products.
Shipping and Handling — Amounts billed to customers related to shipping and handling are included in net sales. Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of goods sold.
Marketing Costs — We promote our products with advertising, consumer incentives, and trade promotions. Such programs include, but are not limited to, discounts, coupons, rebates, and volume-based incentives. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Consumer incentives and trade promotion activities are recorded as a reduction of revenue or as a component of cost of goods sold based on amounts estimated as being due to customers and consumers at the end of the period, based principally on historical utilization and redemption rates. Advertising and promotion expenses totaled $344.2$278.6 million, $414.0$328.3 million, and $463.4$347.2 million in fiscal 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, respectively, and are included in selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses.
Research and Development — We incurred expenses of $90.4$47.3 million, $101.8$44.6 million, and $91.1$59.6 million for research and development activities in fiscal 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, respectively.
Comprehensive Income — Comprehensive income includes net income, currency translation adjustments, certain derivative-related activity, changes in the value of available-for-sale investments, and changes in prior service cost and net actuarial gains (losses) from pension (for amounts not in excess of the 10% “corridor”"corridor") and postretirement health care plans.

47

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

We generally deem our On foreign investments we deem to be essentially permanent in nature, and we do not provide for taxes on currency translation adjustments arising from converting thean investment denominated in a foreign currency to U.S. dollars. When we determine that a foreign investment, as well as undistributed earnings, are no longer permanent in nature, estimated taxes arewill be provided for the related deferred tax liability (asset), if any, resulting from currency translation adjustments.
The following table details the accumulated balances for each component of other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax (except for currency translation adjustments):tax:
 2015 2014 2013
Unrealized currency translation gains (losses)$(113.9) $23.7
 $45.4
Derivative adjustments, net of reclassification adjustments0.9
 1.2
 (64.5)
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities(0.7) (1.1) (1.2)
Pension and post-employment benefit obligations, net of reclassification adjustments(215.8) (158.1) (175.8)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss$(329.5) $(134.3) $(196.1)
 2018 2017 2016
Currency translation losses, net of reclassification adjustments$(94.7) $(98.6) $(95.2)
Derivative adjustments, net of reclassification adjustments1.0
 (1.1) (0.4)
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities0.6
 (0.3) (0.6)
Pension and post-employment benefit obligations, net of reclassification adjustments(17.4) (112.9) (248.3)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss 1
$(110.5) $(212.9) $(344.5)
1 Net of stranded tax effects from change in tax rate as a result of the early adoption of ASU 2018-02 in the amount of $17.4 million which has been reclassified to retained earnings.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The following table summarizes the reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive loss into income (loss):
Fifty-three weeks ended Fifty-two weeks ended 
Affected Line Item in the Consolidated Statement of Operations1
      
Affected Line Item in the Consolidated Statement of Operations1
2015 2014 2018 2017 2016 
Net derivative adjustment, net of tax:          
Cash flow hedges$(0.5) $0.1
 Interest expense, net$0.1
 $(0.2) $(2.1) Interest expense, net
Cash flow hedges2

 54.9
 Selling, general and administrative expenses
(0.5) 55.0
 Total before tax0.1
 (0.2) (2.1) Total before tax
0.2
 (20.6) Income tax expense (benefit)
 0.1
 0.8
 Income tax expense
$(0.3) $34.4
 Net of tax$0.1
 $(0.1) $(1.3) Net of tax
Amortization of pension and postretirement healthcare liabilities:          
Net prior service benefit$(4.2) $(3.4) Selling, general and administrative expenses$(0.4) $(3.9) $(5.1) Selling, general and administrative expenses
Divestiture of Private Brands
 
 (4.3) Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
Pension settlement of equity method investee
 
 (5.2) Equity method investment earnings
Pension settlement1.3
 13.8
 
 Selling, general and administrative expenses
Net actuarial loss3.5
 6.7
 Selling, general and administrative expenses
 0.5
 0.1
 Selling, general and administrative expenses
Curtailment1.5
 
 Cost of goods sold
0.8
 3.3
 Total before tax0.9
 10.4
 (14.5) Total before tax
(0.3) (1.2) Income tax benefit(0.2) (4.0) 4.9
 Income tax expense
$0.5
 $2.1
 Net of tax$0.7
 $6.4
 $(9.6) Net of tax
Currency translation losses$
 $
 $73.4
 Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

 
 73.4
 Total before tax

 
 
 Income tax expense
$
 $
 $73.4
 Net of tax
1 Amounts in parentheses indicate income recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
2 Prior year amount includes $41.8 million less deferred tax benefit of $15.6 million previously reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Foreign Currency Transaction Gains and Losses — We recognized net foreign currency transaction losses from continuing operations of $12.8$1.4 million, $13.5$1.5 million, and $0.1$5.1 million in fiscal 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, respectively, in selling, general and administrativeSG&A expenses.
Business Combinations — We use the acquisition method in accounting for acquired businesses. Under the acquisition method, our financial statements reflect the operations of an acquired business starting from the completion of the acquisition. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.
Reclassifications and other changes — Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation. In addition, the prior year Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows reflects a correction to the year ended May 25, 2014 for non-cash additions to property, plant and equipment resulting in an increase to operating cash flows and an

48

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

increase in cash used in investing cash flows by $17.4 million, of which $3.1 million is related to discontinued operations. Also, the prior year Consolidated Statement of Operations reflects a correction to fiscal 2014 to properly classify accelerated depreciation related to restructure activities, resulting in an increase in cost of goods sold and a decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses of $17.5 million.
Use of Estimates — Preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses as reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Accounting Changes — In July 2013,2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2013-11,2015-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward ExistsInventory, which states that entities should presentrequires an entity to measure inventory within the unrecognized tax benefit as a reductionscope at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the deferred tax asset for a net operating loss ("NOL") or similar tax loss or tax credit carryforward rather than as a liability whenestimated selling prices in the uncertain tax position would reduce the NOL or other carryforward under the tax law. No new disclosures are necessary.ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. We adopted this ASU asprospectively in fiscal 2018. The adoption of the beginning of fiscal 2015. Thisthis guidance did not result inhave a material changeimpact to our financial statements.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

In April 2014,February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08,2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Discontinued OperationsComprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which will allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for the tax effects resulting from "An Act to Provide for Reconciliation Pursuant to Titles II and DisclosuresV of Components of an Entity, which updates the definition of discontinued operations under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("U.S. GAAP"Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2018" (the "Act"). Going forward, only those disposals of components of an entity that represent a strategic shiftare stranded in accumulated other comprehensive income. This standard also requires certain disclosures about stranded tax effects. This ASU, however, does not change the underlying guidance that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity's operations and financial results will be reported as discontinued operations in the financial statements. Previously, a component of an entity that is a reportable segment, an operating segment, a reporting unit, a subsidiary, or an asset group was eligible for discontinued operations presentation. Additionally, the conditionrequires that the entity not have any significanteffect of a change in tax laws or rates be included in income from continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction has been removed. Theoperations. ASU 2018-02 is effective date for the revised standard was for applicable transactions that occur withininterim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption was permitted. We adopted this standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. This resulted in the presentation of historical results of our milling business, prior to the creation of the Ardent Mills joint venture ("Ardent Mills"), as discontinued operations.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which states that entities should present the debt issuance costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Amortization of the costs is reported as interest expense. The effective date for the revised standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Early2018, with early adoption was permitted. It must be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Act is recognized. We adoptedelected to early adopt this standardASU for the fiscal yearperiod ended May 31, 2015. As a result, we have retrospectively adjusted Other assets and Senior long-term debt by $46.9 million forFebruary 25, 2018. The amount of the year ended May 25, 2014.reclassification was $17.4 million.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards — In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP. On July 9, 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of the new revenue recognition standard by one year. The updated standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Based on the FASB’sFASB's ASU, we will apply the new revenue standard in our fiscal year 2019. Early adoption in our fiscal year 2018 is permitted. Entities will have the option to adopt the ASU using either the full retrospective or modified retrospective transition method. We have concluded our assessment of the new standard and will be adopting the provisions of the ASU utilizing the modified retrospective transition method. The adoption of ASU 2014-09 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The effective date for this standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017. We do not expect ASU 2016-01 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, Topic 842, which requires lessees to reflect most leases on their balance sheet as assets and obligations. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The standard permitsis to be applied under the usemodified retrospective method, with elective reliefs, which requires application of either the retrospectivenew guidance for all periods presented.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which clarifies how companies present and classify certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We do not expect ASU 2016-15 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash, which provides amendments to current guidance to address the classifications and presentation of changes in restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We do not expect ASU 2016-18 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which provides a new framework for determining whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or cumulative effect transition method.businesses. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We do not expect ASU 2017-01 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Retirement Benefits: Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which requires companies to present the service cost component of net benefit cost in the same line items in which they report compensation cost. Companies will present all other components of net benefit cost outside a subtotal of operating income, if presented, or disclosed separately. Also, only the service cost component may be eligible for capitalization where applicable. The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the income statement and prospectively for the capitalization of service cost components. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We will adopt ASU 2017-07 in our fiscal 2019. The estimated impact is a reclassification of a benefit of $80.4 million, a benefit of $55.2 million, and a charge of $303.8 million to non-operating income (expense) for fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, which improves the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity's risk management activities in its financial statements and make certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance in current U.S. GAAP. The amendments in this update better align an entity's risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and presentation of hedge results. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We plan to early adopt this ASU at the beginning of our fiscal 2019. We do not expect ASU 2017-12 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

2. ACQUISITIONS
On June 26, 2018, subsequent to the end of fiscal 2018, we entered into a definitive merger agreement with Pinnacle Foods Inc. ("Pinnacle") under which we will acquire all outstanding shares of Pinnacle common stock in a cash and stock transaction valued at approximately $10.9 billion, including Pinnacle's outstanding net debt. Under the terms of the transaction, Pinnacle shareholders will receive $43.11 per share in cash and 0.6494 shares of our common stock for each share of Pinnacle. The implied price of $68.00 per Pinnacle share is based on the volume-weighted average price of our stock for the five days ended June 21, 2018. The planned acquisition is expected to close by the end of calendar 2018 and remains subject to the approval of Pinnacle shareholders, the receipt of regulatory approvals, and other customary closing conditions.
In May 2015,February 2018, we acquired Blake's All Natural Foods,the Sandwich Bros. of Wisconsin® business, maker of frozen breakfast and entree flatbread pocket sandwiches, for a family-owned company specializing in all natural and organic frozen meals, including pot pies, casseroles, pasta dishes, and other entrees, for $20.7cash purchase price of $87.3 million, in cash net of cash acquired.acquired, including working capital adjustments. Approximately $20.0$57.8 million of the purchase price has been classified as goodwill pending determination of the final purchase price allocation.allocation, and $9.7 million and $7.1 million have been classified as non-amortizing and amortizing intangible assets, respectively. The amount allocated to goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes. ThisThe business is included in the Consumer FoodsRefrigerated & Frozen segment.
In July 2014,October 2017, we acquired TaiMei Potato Industry Limited,Angie's Artisan Treats, LLC, maker of Angie's®BOOMCHICKAPOP® ready-to-eat popcorn, for a potato processor in China, for $92.2cash purchase price of $249.8 million, consisting of $74.9 million in cash net of cash acquired, plus assumed liabilities. The purchase included property and equipment associated with making frozen potato products.including working capital adjustments. Approximately $23.8$155.2 million of the purchase price has been classified as goodwill pending determination of the final purchase price allocation.allocation, of which $95.4 million is deductible for income tax purposes. Approximately $3.3$73.8 million and $10.3 million of the purchase price hashave been allocated to

49

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) non-amortizing and amortizing intangible assets, respectively. The business is primarily included in the Grocery & Snacks segment.
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014,In April 2017, we acquired protein-based snacking businesses Thanasi Foods LLC, maker of Duke’s® meat snacks, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

other intangible assets. The amount allocated toBIGS LLC, maker of BIGS® seeds, for $217.6 million, net of cash acquired, including working capital adjustments. Approximately $133.3 million has been classified as goodwill, of which $70.5 million is not deductible for income tax purposes. This business isApproximately $65.1 million and $16.1 million of the purchase price have been allocated to non-amortizing and amortizing intangible assets, respectively. These businesses are primarily included in the Commercial FoodsGrocery & Snacks segment.
In September 2013, we acquired frozen dessert production assets from Harlan Bakeries for $39.9 million in cash. The purchase included machinery, operating systems, warehousing/storage, and other assets associated with making frozen fruit pies, cream pies, pastry shells, and loaf cakes. This business is included in the Consumer Foods segment.
In January 2013,September 2016, we acquired Ralcorp Holdings,the operating assets of Frontera Foods, Inc. ("Ralcorp"). The total amount of consideration paid in connection withand Red Fork LLC, including the acquisition was approximately $4.75 billionFrontera®,Red Fork®, and Salpica® brands. These businesses make authentic, gourmet Mexican food products and contemporary American cooking sauces. We acquired the business for $108.1 million, net of cash acquired, plus assumed liabilities. The results from our Ralcorp acquisition are reflected principally within the Private Brands segment, and to a lesser extent within Commercial Foods and Consumer Foods.
As a result of the Ralcorp acquisition, we recognized a total of $4.38 billion ofincluding working capital adjustments. Approximately $39.5 million has been classified as goodwill and $2.17 billion of brands, trademarks and other intangibles. Amortizable brands, trademarks and other intangibles totaled $2.03 billion. Indefinite lived brands, trademarks and other intangibles totaled $134.1 million. Of the total goodwill, $397.0 million is deductible for tax purposes. The allocation of goodwill to Private Brands, Consumer Foods, and Commercial Foods was $3.52 billion, $512.0$59.5 million and $350.6$7.2 million respectively. See Note 9 for disclosure of subsequent impairment of related goodwillhave been classified as non-amortizing and indefinite lived brands.
In August 2012, we acquired the P.F. Chang's® and Bertolli® brands frozen meal business from Unilever for $266.9 million in cash. Approximately $100.1 million of the purchase price was allocated to goodwill and $91.8 million was allocated to brands, trademarks and other intangibles.amortizing intangible assets, respectively. The amount allocated to goodwill is deductible for tax purposes. This business is included inThese businesses are reflected principally within the Consumer Foods segment.Grocery & Snacks segment, and to a lesser extent within the Refrigerated & Frozen and International segments.
These acquisitions collectively contributed $214.3 million and $36.5 million to net sales during fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively.
For each of these acquisitions, the amounts allocated to goodwill were primarily attributable to anticipated synergies, product portfolios, and other intangibles that do not qualify for separate recognition.
Under the acquisition method of accounting, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in these acquisitions were recorded at their respective estimated fair values at the date of acquisition.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of operations as if the acquisitions of Ralcorp and the P.F. Chang's and Bertolli brands' frozen meals business (collectively, the acquirees) had occurred at the beginning of the year acquired, fiscal 2013. The acquirees' pre-acquisition results have been added to ConAgra Foods' historical results. The pro forma results contained in the table below include adjustments for amortization of acquired intangibles and depreciation expense, as well as related income taxes.
The pro forma results exclude selling, general and administrative expenses for the transaction incurred by Ralcorp prior to the acquisition of $84.4 million, including items such as consultant fees, accelerated stock compensation, and other deal costs; selling, general and administrative expenses for the transaction incurred by the Company of $71.4 million, including consultant fees, financing costs, and other deal costs; and cost of goods sold totaling $16.7 million in non-recurring expense related to the fair value of inventory adjustment at the date of acquisition.
These pro forma results may not necessarily reflect the actual results of operations that would have been achieved, nor are they necessarily indicative of future results of operations. Pro forma results are not presented to reflect the impact of the acquisitions of Tai Mei Potato Industries, Ltd., and Blake’s All Natural Foods in fiscal 2015, as the pro forma impacts are not material.
 For the Fiscal Year Ended May 2013
Pro forma net sales$16,334.9
Pro forma net income from continuing operations757.5
Pro forma net income from continuing operations per share—basic1.84
Pro forma net income from continuing operations per share—diluted1.81


50

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015,27, 2018, May 25, 2014,28, 2017, and May 26, 201329, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

3. RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES
Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan
We previouslyIn May 2013, we announced a plan for the integration and restructuring of the operations of Ralcorp, optimization of the entire Company's supply chain network, manufacturing assets, and dry distribution and mixing centers, and improvement of selling, general and administrative effectiveness and efficiencies, which we refer to as the Supply Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan (the "SCAE Plan")., our plan to integrate and restructure the operations of our Private Brands business, improve SG&A effectiveness and efficiencies, and optimize our supply chain network, manufacturing assets, dry distribution centers, and mixing centers. In fiscal 2016, we announced plans to realize efficiency benefits by reducing SG&A expenses and enhancing trade spend processes and tools, which plans were included as part of the SCAE Plan. Although we announced on June 30, 2015 our intent to exitdivested the Private Brands business, a divestiture of our Private Brands operations may not occur in a timely manner or at all. We will continuewe have continued to implement portions of the SCAE Plan, including work relatedby working to optimizingoptimize our supply chain network, and pursue cost reductions through our selling, generalSG&A functions, enhance trade spend processes and administrative functionstools, and productivity improvements.improve productivity.
Although we remain unable to make good faith estimates relating to the entire SCAE Plan, we are reporting on actions initiated through the end of fiscal 2015,2018, including the estimated amounts or range of amounts for each major type of costs expected to be incurred, and the charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows. As of May 31, 2015,27, 2018, our Board of Directors has approved the incurrence of up to $394.0$900.9 million of expenses in connection with the SCAE Plan.Plan, including expenses allocated for the Private Brands and Lamb Weston operations. We have incurred or expect to incur approximately $267.3$471.6 million of charges which includes $177.3($322.1 million of cash charges and $90.0$149.5 million of non-cash charges.charges) for actions identified to date under the SCAE Plan related to our continuing operations. We recognized charges of $38.0 million, $63.6 million, and $281.8 million in relation to the SCAE Plan related to our continuing operations in fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. We expect to incur costs related to the SCAE Plan over a multi-year period.
We anticipate that we will recognize the following pre-tax expenses associatedin association with the SCAE Plan related to our continuing operations (amounts include charges recognized in fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013)from plan inception to May 27, 2018):
Consumer Foods Corporate Commercial Foods Private Brands TotalGrocery & Snacks Refrigerated & Frozen International Foodservice Corporate Total
Multi-employer pension costs$1.5
 $11.4
 $
 $
 $12.9
Pension costs$33.4
 $1.5
 $
 $
 $
 $34.9
Accelerated depreciation31.2
 
 
 26.0
 57.2
37.0
 18.6
 
 
 1.2
 56.8
Other cost of goods sold6.3
 
 
 4.1
 10.4
11.9
 2.1
 
 
 
 14.0
Total cost of goods sold39.0
 11.4
 
 30.1
 80.5
82.3
 22.2
 
 
 1.2
 105.7
Severance and related costs25.3
 45.2
 8.0
 13.3
 91.8
Severance and related costs, net27.5
 10.3
 3.7
 7.9
 102.6
 152.0
Fixed asset impairment (net of gains on disposal)6.1
 6.9
 
 
 11.2
 24.2
Accelerated depreciation
 2.9
 
 
 2.9

 
 
 
 4.1
 4.1
Fixed asset impairment / Loss on disposal2.6
 0.4
 
 21.1
 24.1
Contract/lease cancellation expenses1.0
 0.6
 0.9
 
 84.4
 86.9
Consulting/professional fees1.0
 0.4
 0.1
 
 54.0
 55.5
Other selling, general and administrative expenses17.9
 33.8
 
 16.3
 68.0
16.4
 3.3
 
 
 23.5
 43.2
Total selling, general and administrative expenses45.8
 82.3
 8.0
 50.7
 186.8
52.0
 21.5
 4.7
 7.9
 279.8
 365.9
Consolidated total$84.8
 $93.7
 $8.0
 $80.8
 $267.3
$134.3
 $43.7
 $4.7
 $7.9
 $281.0
 $471.6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

During fiscal 2015,2018, we recognized the following pre-tax expenses for the SCAE Plan:Plan related to our continuing operations:
Consumer Foods Corporate Commercial Foods Private Brands TotalGrocery & Snacks Refrigerated & Frozen International Corporate Total
Multi-employer pension costs$1.5
 $0.2
 $
 $
 $1.7
Pension costs$0.5
 $
 $
 $
 $0.5
Accelerated depreciation19.1
 
 
 7.4
 26.5
2.0
 
 
 
 2.0
Other cost of goods sold1.2
 
 
 2.8
 4.0
5.3
 
 
 
 5.3
Total cost of goods sold21.8
 0.2
 
 10.2
 32.2
7.8
 
 
 
 7.8
Severance and related costs8.3
 1.5
 3.2
 2.0
 15.0
Severance and related costs, net2.6
 
 1.2
 0.7
 4.5
Fixed asset impairment (net of gains on disposal)(1.2) 
 
 4.4
 3.2
Accelerated depreciation
 1.8
 
 
 1.8

 
 
 1.5
 1.5
Fixed asset impairment / Loss on disposal0.6
 0.4
 
 17.2
 18.2
Contract/lease cancellation expenses0.2
 
 0.3
 13.0
 13.5
Consulting/professional fees0.1
 
 
 1.0
 1.1
Other selling, general and administrative expenses4.4
 6.9
 
 6.7
 18.0
4.6
 0.1
 
 1.7
 6.4
Total selling, general and administrative expenses13.3
 10.6
 3.2
 25.9
 53.0
6.3
 0.1
 1.5
 22.3
 30.2
Consolidated total$35.1
 $10.8
 $3.2
 $36.1
 $85.2
$14.1
 $0.1
 $1.5
 $22.3
 $38.0
Included in the above resultstable are $38.4$30.6 million of charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows and $46.8$7.4 million in non-cash charges.

51

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

We recognized the following cumulative (plan inception to May 31, 2015)27, 2018) pre-tax expenses related tofor the SCAE Plan related to our continuing operations in our Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations:
Consumer Foods Corporate Commercial Foods Private Brands TotalGrocery & Snacks Refrigerated & Frozen International Foodservice Corporate Total
Multi-employer pension costs$1.5
 $11.4
 $
 $
 $12.9
Pension costs$33.4
 $1.5
 $
 $
 $
 $34.9
Accelerated depreciation21.5
 
 
 22.5
 44.0
33.0
 18.6
 
 
 1.2
 52.8
Other cost of goods sold2.0
 
 
 3.4
 5.4
10.3
 2.1
 
 
 
 12.4
Total cost of goods sold25.0
 11.4
 
 25.9
 62.3
76.7
 22.2
 
 
 1.2
 100.1
Severance and related costs21.0
 44.1
 8.0
 10.9
 84.0
Severance and related costs, net26.5
 10.3
 3.7
 7.9
 102.2
 150.6
Fixed asset impairment (net of gains on disposal)6.1
 6.9
 
 
 11.2
 24.2
Accelerated depreciation
 2.4
 
 
 2.4

 
 
 
 4.1
 4.1
Fixed asset impairment / Loss on disposal0.9
 0.4
 
 21.1
 22.4
Contract/lease cancellation expenses1.0
 0.6
 0.9
 
 84.3
 86.8
Consulting/professional fees1.0
 0.4
 0.1
 
 52.2
 53.7
Other selling, general and administrative expenses4.4
 10.1
 
 11.7
 26.2
15.8
 3.3
 
 
 21.7
 40.8
Total selling, general and administrative expenses26.3
 57.0
 8.0
 43.7
 135.0
50.4
 21.5
 4.7
 7.9
 275.7
 360.2
Consolidated total$51.3
 $68.4
 $8.0
 $69.6
 $197.3
$127.1
 $43.7
 $4.7
 $7.9
 $276.9
 $460.3
Included in the above results are $127.2$316.1 million of charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows and $70.1$144.2 million in non-cash charges.
Liabilities recorded for Not included in the SCAE Planabove table are $130.2 million of pre-tax expenses ($84.5 million of cash charges and changes therein for fiscal 2015 were as follows:
 
Balance at
May 25,
2014
 
Costs Incurred
and Charged
to Expense
 
Costs Paid
or  Otherwise Settled
 
Changes  in
Estimates
 
Balance at
May 31,
2015
Multi-employer pension costs$11.2
 $1.5
 $(1.5) $0.2
 $11.4
Severance and related costs46.9
 19.1
 (45.5) (4.1) 16.4
Other costs6.0
 24.6
 (18.2) (2.9) 9.5
Total$64.1
 $45.2
 $(65.2) $(6.8) $37.3
Related$45.7 million of non-cash charges) related to our correction for reclassification of accelerated depreciationthe Private Brands operations which we sold in fiscal 2015, we increased cost of goods sold and decreased selling, general and administrative expenses by $8.0 million, $8.5 million, and $3.9 million for the first quarter ended August 24, 2014, second quarter ended November 23, 2014, and third quarter ended February 22, 2015, respectively.
Acquisition-related Restructuring Costs
During fiscal 2012, we started incurring costs in connection with actions taken to attain synergies when integrating businesses acquired prior to the third quarter of fiscal 2013. These costs, collectively referred to as "acquisition-related restructuring costs", include severance2016 and other costs associated with consolidating facilities and administrative functions. In connection with the acquisition-related restructuring costs, we have incurred charges of $23.7$2.1 million $15.8 million of which are charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows and $7.9 million of which are non-cash charges. At the end of fiscal 2014, the acquisition-related restructuring costs were substantially complete.
During fiscal 2015 and 2014, we recognized $0.3 million and $9.4 million, respectively, of pre-tax expenses for acquisition-related restructuring costs, primarily representing impairment of equipment, all within our Consumer Foods segment.(all resulting in cash charges) related to Lamb Weston.

52

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015,27, 2018, May 25, 2014,28, 2017, and May 26, 201329, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

We recognizedLiabilities recorded for the following cumulative (plan inceptionSCAE Plan related to May 31, 2015) pre-tax acquisition-related exit costs in our Consolidated Statement of Operations:continuing operations and changes therein for fiscal 2018 were as follows:
 
Consumer
Foods
 Corporate Total
Severance and related costs$9.0
 $
 $9.0
Asset impairment5.4
 2.5
 7.9
Other, net6.8
 
 6.8
Total selling, general and administrative expenses21.2
 2.5
 23.7
Consolidated total$21.2
 $2.5
 $23.7
Other Restructuring Plans
In August 2011, we made a decision to reorganize our Consumer Foods segment sales function and certain other administrative functions within our Commercial Foods segment and general corporate expenses. These actions, collectively referred to as the "Administrative Efficiency Plan", were intended to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the affected sales and administrative functions. At the end of fiscal 2013, the Administrative Efficiency Plan was substantially complete.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, our Board of Directors approved a plan designed to optimize our manufacturing and distribution networks. We refer to this plan as the "Network Optimization Plan". The Network Optimization Plan consists of projects that involve, among other things, the exit of certain manufacturing facilities, the disposal of underutilized manufacturing assets, and actions designed to optimize our distribution network. We have recognized expenses associated with the Network Optimization Plan, including but not limited to, impairments of property, plant and equipment, accelerated depreciation, severance and related costs, and plan implementation costs (e.g., consulting and employee relocation). At the end of fiscal 2013, the Network Optimization Plan was substantially complete.
At the time of its acquisition, Ralcorp had certain initiatives underway designed to optimize its manufacturing and distribution networks. We refer to these actions and the related costs as "Ralcorp Pre-acquisition Restructuring Plans". These plans consisted of projects that involved, among other things, the exit of certain manufacturing facilities. At the end of fiscal 2014, the Pre-acquisition Restructuring Plans costs were substantially complete.
In connection with the aforementioned plans, we recognized charges of $2.4 million and $7.6 million in fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively.
 Balance at May 28,
2017
 
Costs Incurred
and Charged
to Expense
 
Costs Paid
or Otherwise Settled
 
Changes in
Estimates
 
Balance at
May 27,
2018
Pension costs$31.8
 $
 $
 $0.5
 $32.3
Severance and related costs13.8
 5.7
 (12.0) (1.2) 6.3
Consulting/professional fees0.6
 1.1
 (1.6) 
 0.1
Contract/lease cancellation11.6
 13.7
 (20.2) (0.2) 4.9
Other costs1.9
 11.0
 (12.7) 
 0.2
Total$59.7
 $31.5
 $(46.5) $(0.9) $43.8


4. LONG-TERM DEBT
53

 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
  4.65% senior debt due January 2043$176.7
 $176.7
  6.625% senior debt due August 203991.4
 91.4
  8.25% senior debt due September 2030300.0
 300.0
  7.0% senior debt due October 2028382.2
 382.2
  6.7% senior debt due August 20279.2
 9.2
  7.125% senior debt due October 2026262.5
 262.5
  3.2% senior debt due January 2023837.0
 837.0
  3.25% senior debt due September 2022250.0
 250.0
  9.75% subordinated debt due March 2021195.9
 195.9
  LIBOR plus 0.50% senior debt due October 2020500.0
 
  4.95% senior debt due August 2020126.6
 126.6
  LIBOR plus 0.75% term loan due February 2019300.0
 
  2.1% senior debt due March 2018
 70.0
  1.9% senior debt due January 2018
 119.6
  2.00% to 9.59% lease financing obligations due on various dates through 203394.7
 131.2
  Other indebtedness0.2
 0.2
    Total face value of debt3,526.4
 2,952.5
    Unamortized fair value adjustment27.6
 30.8
    Unamortized discounts(5.8) (6.4)
    Unamortized debt issuance costs(11.3) (10.9)
    Adjustment due to hedging activity1.6
 2.2
    Less current installments(307.0) (199.0)
      Total long-term debt$3,231.5
 $2,769.2

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015,27, 2018, May 25, 2014,28, 2017, and May 26, 201329, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

4. LONG-TERM DEBT
 May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014
  4.65% senior debt due January 2043$737.0
 $937.0
  6.625% senior debt due August 2039 (including Ralcorp senior notes)450.0
 450.0
  8.25% senior debt due September 2030300.0
 300.0
  7.0% senior debt due October 2028382.2
 382.2
  6.7% senior debt due August 20279.2
 9.2
  7.125% senior debt due October 2026372.4
 372.4
  3.2% senior debt due January 20231,000.0
 1,225.0
  3.25% senior debt due September 2022250.0
 250.0
  9.75% subordinated debt due March 2021195.9
 195.9
  4.95% senior debt due August 2020 (including Ralcorp senior notes)300.0
 300.0
  7.0% senior debt due April 2019475.0
 500.0
  2.1% senior debt due March 2018225.0
 250.0
  1.9% senior debt due January 20181,000.0
 1,000.0
  LIBOR plus 1.75% term loans due January 2018
 900.0
  5.819% senior debt due June 2017475.0
 500.0
  LIBOR plus 0.37% term loans due July 2016550.0
 
  1.3% senior debt due January 2016750.0
 750.0
  1.35% senior debt due September 2015250.0
 250.0
  2.00% to 9.59% lease financing obligations due on various dates through 204068.7
 78.7
  Other indebtedness10.9
 86.4
    Total face value of debt7,801.3
 8,736.8
    Unamortized fair value adjustment of senior debt in connection with Ralcorp146.7
 154.5
    Unamortized discounts/premiums(32.8) (46.5)
    Unamortized debt issuance costs(30.1) (46.9)
    Adjustment due to hedging activity11.8
 6.7
    Less current installments(1,008.0) (84.1)
      Total long-term debt$6,888.9
 $8,720.5
The aggregate minimum principal maturities of the long-term debt for each of the five fiscal years following May 31, 2015,27, 2018, are as follows:
2016$1,009.0
2017568.4
20181,706.3
2019479.7
20204.0
2019$307.1
20206.7
2021829.4
20226.9
20231,093.6

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, we repaid the remaining principal balance of $70.0 million of our 2.1% senior notes on the maturity date of March 15, 2018.
54

NotesDuring the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we entered into a term loan agreement (the "Term Loan Agreement") with a financial institution. The Term Loan Agreement provides for term loans to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014,the Company in an aggregate principal amount not in excess of $300.0 million. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, we borrowed the full amount of the $300.0 million provided for under the Term Loan Agreement. The Term Loan Agreement matures on February 26, 2019. The term loan bears interest at a rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 0.75% per annum and May 26, 2013is fully prepayable without penalty.
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

During the third quarter of fiscal 2015,2018, we repurchased $225.0repaid the remaining principal balance of $119.6 million of our 1.9% senior notes on the maturity date of January 25, 2018.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we repaid the remaining capital lease liability balance of $28.5 million in connection with the early exit of an unfavorable lease contract (see Note 8).
During the second quarter of fiscal 2018, we issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate notes due October 9, 2020. The notes bear interest at a rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 0.50% per annum.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2017, we repaid the remaining principal balance of $224.8 million of our 5.819% senior notes due 2017 and $248.2 million principal amount of our 7.0% senior notes due 2019, in each case prior to maturity, resulting in a net loss on early retirement of debt of $32.7 million.
In connection with the Spinoff of Lamb Weston (see Note 6), Lamb Weston issued to us $1.54 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes (the "Lamb Weston notes"). On November 9, 2016, we exchanged the Lamb Weston notes for $250.2 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.819% senior notes due 2017, $880.4 million aggregate principal amount of our 1.9% senior notes due 2018, $154.9 million aggregate principal amount of our 2.1% senior notes due 2018, $86.9 million aggregate principal amount of our 7.0% senior notes due 2019, and $71.1 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.95% senior notes due 2020 (collectively, the "Conagra notes"), which had been purchased in 2023, $200.0the open market by certain investment banks prior to the Spinoff. Following the exchange, we cancelled the Conagra notes. These actions resulted in a net loss of $60.6 million as a cost of early retirement of debt.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we repaid the entire principal balance of $550.0 million of our floating rate notes on the maturity date of July 21, 2016.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2016, we repurchased $560.3 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2043, $25.0$341.8 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2039, $139.9 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2019, $25.0$110.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2018, and $25.02026, $85.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2017,2020, and $163.0 million of aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2023, in each case prior to maturity in a tender offer, resulting in a net loss of $16.3$23.9 million as a cost of early retirement of debt, including a $9.5 million tender premium.debt.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2015, we issued $550.0 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate notes due July 21, 2016. The notes bear interest at a rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 0.37% per annum.
During fiscal 2014,2016, we repaid the entire principal balance of $500.0$750.0 million of our 5.875%1.30% senior notes on the maturity date of January 25, 2016. The repayment was primarily funded through the issuance of term loans totaling $600.0 million, which were due April 15, 2014.
Duringrepaid in the third quarter of fiscal 2013, in order to finance a portion2016 with the proceeds from the divestiture of our acquisitionPrivate Brands business.
See Note 6 for repayment of senior notes issued by Ralcorp we (i) issued senior unsecured notesHoldings, Inc. ("Ralcorp") in an aggregate principal amount of $3.975$33.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2016.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

During the second quarter of fiscal 2016, we repaid the entire principal balance of $250.0 million of our 1.35% senior notes on the maturity date of September 10, 2015.
Our most restrictive debt agreements (the Facility (as defined in Note 5) and the Term Loan Agreement) generally require our ratio of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) to interest expense to be not less than 3.0 to 1.0 and our ratio of funded debt to EBITDA to be not greater than 3.75 to 1.0 (provided that such ratio may be increased at the option of the Company in connection with a material transaction), witheach ratio to be calculated on a rolling four-quarter basis. As of May 27, 2018, we were in compliance with all financial covenants.
Net interest expense consists of:
 2018 2017 2016
Long-term debt$161.2
 $203.6
 $302.9
Short-term debt4.8
 0.6
 1.9
Interest income(3.8) (3.7) (1.2)
Interest capitalized(3.5) (5.0) (7.8)
 $158.7
 $195.5
 $295.8
Interest paid from continuing operations was $164.5 million, $223.7 million, and $322.0 million in fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
In connection with the planned acquisition of Pinnacle (see Note 2), we have secured $9.0 billion (ii) issued senior unsecured notesin fully committed bridge financing from affiliates of Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. The commitments under the committed bridge financing were subsequently reduced by the amounts of a term loan agreement we entered into on July 11, 2018 with a syndicate of financial institutions providing for term loans to us in an aggregate principal amount of $716.0up to $1.3 billion. The term loan agreement generally requires our ratio of EBITDA to interest expense to be not less than 3.0 to 1.0 and our ratio of funded debt to EBITDA to not exceed certain specified levels, with each ratio to be calculated on a rolling four-quarter basis. The funding under the term loan agreement is anticipated to occur simultaneously with the closing date of the acquisition. In connection with the acquisition, we expect to incur an aggregate of up to $8.3 billion of long-term debt, including for the payment of the cash portion of the merger consideration, the repayment of Pinnacle debt, the refinancing of certain Conagra debt, and the payment of related fees and expenses. The permanent financing is also expected to include approximately $600 million in exchangeof incremental cash proceeds from the issuance of equity and/or divestitures. 

5. CREDIT FACILITIES AND BORROWINGS

At May 27, 2018, we had a revolving credit facility (the "Facility") with a syndicate of financial institutions that provides for senior notes issued by Ralcorp, (iii) assumed senior notes issued by Ralcorp in ana maximum aggregate principal amount outstanding at any one time of $1.25 billion (subject to increase to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $460.7 million, which$1.75 billion with the consent of the lenders). The Facility matures on February 16, 2022. As of May 27, 2018, there were prepaidno outstanding borrowings under the Facility. 

The Facility contains events of default customary for unsecured investment grade credit facilities with corresponding grace periods. The Facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants for unsecured investment grade credit facilities of this type. It generally requires our ratio of EBITDA to interest expense to be not less than 3.0 to 1.0 and our ratio of funded debt to EBITDA to be not greater than 3.75 to 1.0 (provided that such ratio may be increased at the option of the Company in connection with a material transaction), witheach ratio to be calculated on a rolling four-quarter basis. As of May 27, 2018, we were in compliance with the Facility's financial covenants.

On July 11, 2018, subsequent to our fiscal 2013,year end, we entered into an amended and (iv) borrowed $1.5restated revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions providing for a revolving credit facility in a maximum aggregate principal amount outstanding at any one time of $1.6 billion under our new Term Loan Facility.
Our senior unsecured notes in an(subject to increase to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $3.975 billion$2.1 billion).  It replaces the existing Facility and generally requires our ratio of EBITDA to interest expense to be not less than 3.0 to 1.0 and our ratio of funded debt to EBITDA to not exceed certain specified levels, with each ratio to be calculated on a rolling four-quarter basis.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

We finance our short-term liquidity needs with bank borrowings, commercial paper borrowings, and bankers' acceptances. As of May 27, 2018, we had $277.0 million outstanding under our commercial paper program at an average weighted interest rate of 2.08%. As of May 28, 2017, we had $26.2 million outstanding under our commercial paper program at an average weighted interest rate of 1.23%.

6. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND OTHER DIVESTITURES
Lamb Weston Spinoff
On November 9, 2016, we completed the Spinoff of our Lamb Weston business. As of such date, we did not beneficially own any equity interest in Lamb Weston and no longer consolidated Lamb Weston into our financial results. The business results were issuedpreviously reported in four tranches: 1.3% senior notes due January 25, 2016 in an aggregate principal amountthe Commercial segment. We reflected the results of $750.0 million; 1.9% senior notes due January 25, 2018 in an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion; 3.2% senior notes due January 25, 2023 in an aggregate principal amount of $1.225 billion; and 4.65% senior notes due January 25, 2043 in an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion. During fiscal 2014, we repaid $63.0 millionthis business as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
The summary comparative financial results of the 4.65% senior notes due in 2043 prior to maturity, resulting in a net gain of $3.7 million.
Our senior unsecured notes in an aggregate principal amount of $716.0 million were issued in exchange for senior notes issued by Ralcorp pursuant to our offer to exchange (i) any and all 4.95% senior notes due August 15, 2020 issued by Ralcorp for up to an aggregate principal amount of $300.0 million of new 4.95% senior notes due August 15, 2020 issued byLamb Weston business through the Company and cash and (ii) any and all 6.625% senior notes due August 15, 2039 issued by Ralcorp for up to an aggregate principal amount of $450.0 million of new 6.625% senior notes due August 15, 2039 issued by the Company and cash. Our senior unsecured notes in an aggregate principal amount of $716.0 million consistdate of the following:Spinoff, included within discontinued operations, were as follows:
4.95% senior notes due August 2020 (2.92% effective interest rate)$282.7
6.625% senior notes due August 2039 (4.86% effective interest rate)433.3
 2018 2017 2016
Net sales$
 $1,407.9
 $2,975.0
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes and equity method investment earnings$(0.3) $172.3
 $474.8
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity method investment earnings(0.3) 172.3
 474.8
Income tax expense (benefit)(14.6) 87.5
 178.9
Equity method investment earnings
 15.9
 71.7
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax14.3
 100.7
 367.6
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 6.8
 9.2
Net income from discontinued operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.$14.3
 $93.9
 $358.4
SeniorDuring fiscal 2017, we incurred $74.8 million of expenses in connection with the Spinoff primarily related to professional fees and contract services associated with preparation of regulatory filings and separation activities. These expenses are reflected in income from discontinued operations. During fiscal 2018, a $14.5 million income tax benefit was recorded due to an adjustment of the estimated deductibility of these costs.
In connection with the Spinoff, total assets of $2.28 billion and total liabilities of $2.98 billion (including debt of $2.46 billion) were transferred to Lamb Weston. As part of the consideration for the Spinoff, the Company received a cash payment from Lamb Weston in the amount of $823.5 million. See Note 4 for discussion of the debt-for-debt exchange related to the Spinoff.
We entered into a transition services agreement in connection with the Lamb Weston Spinoff and recognized $2.2 million and $4.2 million of income for the performance of services during fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively, classified within SG&A expenses.
Private Brands Operations
On February 1, 2016, pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2015, we completed the disposition of our Private Brands operations to TreeHouse Foods, Inc. ("Treehouse") for $2.6 billion in cash on a debt-free basis.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

As a result of the disposition, we recognized a pre-tax charge of $1.92 billion ($1.44 billion after-tax) in fiscal 2016 to write-down the goodwill and long-lived assets to the final sales price, less costs to sell, and to recognize the final loss of the Private Brands business. We reflected the results of this business as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
In fiscal 2016, we repaid senior notes issued by Ralcorp in an aggregate principal amount of $33.9 million, were not exchanged and remain outstanding, consisting of 4.95% senior notes issued by Ralcorp due August 15, 2020 in an aggregate principal amount of $17.2 million (with an effective interest rate of 2.83%) and 6.625% senior notes issued by Ralcorp due August 15, 2039 in total an aggregate principal amount of $16.7 million (with an effective interest rate of 4.82%) (collectively, the "Ralcorp Notes"). The Ralcorp Notes are included, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at May 31, 2015.
During fiscal 2013, we offeredeach case, prior to purchase for cash any and all 7.29% senior notes due August 15, 2018 issued by Ralcorp, floating rate senior notes due August 15, 2018 issued by Ralcorp, and 7.39% senior notes due August 15, 2020 issued by Ralcorp,maturity, resulting in a total aggregate principal amount of $664.5 million. Pursuant to this offer, we purchased senior notes issued by Ralcorp in a total aggregate principal amount of $631.5 million. Ralcorp's 7.29% senior notes due August 15, 2018 in an aggregate principal amount of $33.0 million were not tendered for purchase and remained outstanding (the "Ralcorp Discharged Notes"). During fiscal 2013, we paid $44.8 million, consisting of principal, interest, and contractual amounts payable to satisfy and discharge the Ralcorp Discharged Notes, which were satisfied and discharged by the trustee during fiscal 2013. We recognized a charge of $1.3loss $5.4 million as a cost of early retirement of debt.debt, which is reflected in discontinued operations.
Upon our acquisition of Ralcorp, we assumed senior notes issued by Ralcorp in an aggregate principal amount of $460.7 million (the "Ralcorp Callable Notes"), and gave notice of our intent to prepay them during the third quarter of fiscal 2013. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we prepaid the Ralcorp Callable Notes at the contractually determined value of $562.5 million. This did not result in a significant gain or loss.
During fiscal 2013, we borrowed $1.5 billion under our unsecured Term Loan Facility with a syndicate of banks. We elected to base the interest rateThe summary comparative financial results of the borrowings on LIBOR plus 1.75%. WePrivate Brands business, included within discontinued operations, were required to repay borrowings under the Term Loan Facility during the term of the facility in equal quarterly installments of 2.5% per quarter commencing on June 1, 2013, with the remainder of the borrowings to be paid on the maturity date of the facility, unless prepaid prior to such date in

55

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

accordance with the terms of the Term Loan Facility. During fiscal 2013, we prepaid $600.0 million of the $1.5 billion borrowings and recognized a charge of $6.2 million as a cost of early retirement of debt. During fiscal 2015, we repaid the remaining borrowings of $900.0 million, prior to maturity, resulting in a loss of $8.3 million as a cost of early retirement of debt. The Term Loan Facility was terminated after repayment.
In connection with the aforementioned financing for the Ralcorp acquisition, we capitalized $52.1 million of debt issuance costs and recognized expense of $27.3 million in related fees during fiscal 2013.
Net interest expense consists of:follows:
 2015 2014 2013
Long-term debt$336.9
 $393.8
 $284.0
Short-term debt2.8
 1.5
 0.6
Interest income(1.2) (2.3) (2.9)
Interest capitalized(6.6) (13.6) (5.5)
 $331.9
 $379.4
 $276.2
 2018 2017 2016
Net sales$
 $
 $2,490.6
Loss on sale of business$
 $(1.6) $
Long-lived asset impairment charges
 
 (1,923.0)
Income from operations of discontinued operations before income taxes0.4
 3.9
 168.0
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity method investment earnings0.4
 2.3
 (1,755.0)
Income tax expense (benefit)0.5
 (0.3) (593.1)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax$(0.1) $2.6
 $(1,161.9)
Interest paid from continuing operations was $337.7 million, $395.6 million, and $215.4 million in fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.
Our net interest expense in fiscal 2015 and 2014 was reduced by $7.1 million and $4.1 million, respectively, due to the impact of the interest rate swap contracts designated as fair value hedges entered into in the third quarter of fiscal 2014. The interest rate swaps effectively converted the interest on our senior long-term debt instruments maturing in fiscal 2019 and 2020 from fixed rate to floating rate (see Note 18). These interest rate swap contracts were terminated during the third quarter of fiscal 2015. The cumulative adjustments to the fair value of the debt instruments that were hedged (the effective portion of the hedges), totaling $12.6 million, will be amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining lives of the debt instruments (through fiscal 2020). Our net interest expense was reduced by $0.8 million for fiscal 2015 as a result of this amortization.
We entered into interest rate swapsa transition services agreement with TreeHouse and recognized $2.2 million, $16.9 million, and $8.3 million of income for the performance of services during fiscal 2010 that effectively changed our interest rate on the senior long-term debt instrument that matured in fiscal 2014 from fixed to variable. During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we terminated these interest rate swap contracts2018, 2017, and received proceeds of $28.2 million. The cumulative adjustment to the fair value of the debt instrument that was hedged (the effective portion of the hedge) was amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining life of the debt instrument (through fiscal 2014). Net interest expense for fiscal 2014 and 2013 was reduced by $8.6 million and $9.2 million,2016, respectively, due to the impact of the interest rate swap contracts.
As a result of our acquisition of Ralcorp, the senior unsecured notes issued in exchange for senior notes issued by Ralcorp of $716.0 million and the senior notes issued by Ralcorp that remain outstanding of $33.9 million were recorded at fair value. The combined fair value adjustment on these notes was $163.8 million and is being amortizedclassified within interest expense over the life of the respective notes. Our net interest expense in fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013 was reduced by $7.8 million, $7.1 million, and $2.2 million, respectively, as a result of this amortization.

5. CREDIT FACILITIES AND BORROWINGS
At May 31, 2015, we had a $1.50 billion multi-year revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions that matures in September 2018. The multi-year facility has historically been used principally as a back-up facility for our commercial paper program. As of May 31, 2015, there were no outstanding borrowings under the credit facility. Borrowings under the multi-year facility, based on our fiscal year-end credit rating, bear interest at 1.25% over LIBOR and may be prepaid without penalty. The multi-year revolving credit facility requires us to repay borrowings if our consolidated funded debt exceeds 65% of our consolidated capital base, or if our fixed charges coverage ratio is less than 1.75 to 1.0 on a four-quarter rolling basis. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company entered into an amendment to exclude certain goodwill and other intangible asset impairments from the calculation of the fixed charge coverage ratio. As of May 31, 2015, we were in compliance with all financial covenants in the facility.

56

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

We finance our short-term liquidity needs with bank borrowings, commercial paper borrowings, and bankers’ acceptances. As of May 31, 2015, there were no outstanding borrowings under our commercial paper program. As of May 25, 2014, we had $137.0 million outstanding under our commercial paper program at an average weighted interest rate of 0.4%.

6. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONSSG&A expenses.
ConAgra Mills Operations
On May 29, 2014, the Company, Cargill, Incorporated ("Cargill"), and CHS, Inc. ("CHS") completed the formation of the Ardent Mills.Mills joint venture. In connection with the formation, we contributed to Ardent Mills all of the assets of ConAgra Mills, our milling operations. For further details about the joint venture, see Note 7. We reflected the results of the ConAgra Mills operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of the discontinued business have been reclassified as assets and liabilities held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for the period presented prior to divestiture. Our equity in the earnings of Ardent Mills is reflected in our continuing operations
Medallion Foodsoperations.
In fiscal 2014,2017, we completed the sale ofadjusted a small snack business, Medallion Foods, for $32.0 million in cash. The business results were previously reflected in the Private Brands segment. We reflected the results of these operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of the discontinued business have been reclassified as assets and liabilities held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for the period presented prior to divestiture. We recognized a pre-tax loss of $5.8 million ($3.5 million after-tax) on the sale of this business in fiscal 2014. In fiscal 2014, we recognized an impairment chargemulti-employer pension withdrawal liability related to allocated amountsour former milling operations by $2.0 million ($1.3 million after-tax). This expense was recognized within discontinued operations.
Other Divestitures
During the third quarter of goodwill and intangible assets, totaling $25.4 million ($15.2 million after-tax), in anticipation of this divestiture.
fiscal 2018, we entered into an agreement to sell our LightlifeDel Monte® Operations
In fiscal 2014, weprocessed fruit and vegetable business in Canada, which is part of our International segment, to Bonduelle Group. The transaction was completed the sale of the assets of the Lightlife® business for $54.7 million in cash. This business produced and sold vegetarian-based burgers, hot dogs, and other meatless frozen and refrigerated items. The results of this business were previously reflected in the Consumer Foods segment. We reflectedfirst quarter of fiscal 2019 and was valued at approximately $43.0 million Canadian dollars, which was approximately $34.0 million U.S. dollars at the results of these operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. We recognized a pre-tax gain of $32.1 million ($19.8 million after-tax)exchange rate on the saledate of this business in fiscal 2014.announcement. The assets of the discontinued Lightlifethis business have been reclassified as assets held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for the period presented prior to divestiture.all periods presented.
The results ofassets classified as held for sale reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the aforementioned businesses which have been divested are included within discontinued operations. The summary comparative financial results of discontinued operationsDel Monte® processed fruit and vegetable business in Canada were as follows:
 2015 2014 2013
Net sales$16.2
 $1,929.3
 $2,014.9
Net gain on sale of businesses$627.3
 $116.6
 $
Long-lived asset impairment charge
 (25.4) 
Income (loss) from operations of discontinued operations before income taxes(9.9) 132.6
 126.0
Income before income taxes617.4
 223.8
 126.0
Income tax expense250.8
 82.7
 38.3
Equity method investment earnings
 0.3
 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax$366.6
 $141.4
 $87.7
 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
Current assets$6.1
 $6.3
Noncurrent assets (including goodwill of $5.8 million)11.5
 11.4
Other Assets Held for Sale

During fiscal 2014, we began actively marketing for sale an onion processing facilityNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and farmland previously acquired from an onion products supplier. During fiscal 2014, we sold the farmland for proceeds of $15.1 million. We recognized a pre-tax gain of $5.1 million ($3.2 million after-tax) on the sale of this landMay 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in fiscal 2014. millions except per share amounts)

During the thirdfourth quarter of fiscal 2015,2017, we signed an agreement to sell our Wesson® oil business, which is part of our Grocery & Snacks segment, to The J.M. Smucker Company ("Smucker"). During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, Conagra Brands and Smucker terminated the agreement. This outcome followed the decision of the Federal Trade Commission, announced on March 5, 2018, to challenge the pending sale. The Company is still actively marketing the Wesson® oil business and expects to sell it within the next twelve months. The assets of this business have been reclassified as assets held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented.
In connection with the initial pending sale of the Wesson® oil business, we recognized an impairment charge of $27.6 million within SG&A expenses in fiscal 2017, as a production facility was not initially included in the assets to be sold, and we did not expect to recover the processingcarrying value of this facility through future associated cash flows. Subsequent to the terminated agreement with Smucker, this production facility has been included in noncurrent assets held for sale.
The assets classified as held for sale reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the Wesson® oil business were as follows:
 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
Current assets$37.7
 $35.5
Noncurrent assets (including goodwill of $74.5 million)101.0
 102.8
During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we completed the sales of our Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings business ("Spicetec") and our JM Swank business, each of which was part of our Commercial segment, for $329.7 million and $159.3 million, respectively, in cash, proceedsnet of $11.0cash included in the dispositions. We recognized pre-tax gains from the sales of $144.8 million resultingand $52.6 million, respectively. We entered into transition services agreements in an immaterial gain. The processing facilityconnection with the sales of these businesses and recognized $0.2 million and $1.9 million of income during fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017, respectively, classified within SG&A expenses.
In addition, we are actively marketing certain other assets. These assets have been reclassified as assets held for sale within our Consolidated Balance SheetSheets for the period presented prior to sale. Theseall periods presented. The balance of these assets were held within our Commercial Foods segment.

57

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The assets and liabilities classified as held for sale reflectedwas $10.4 million and $14.9 million in our Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:
 May 25, 2014
Cash and cash equivalents$41.8
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1.2172.4
Receivable on sale of flour milling assets162.4
Inventories215.6
Prepaids and other current assets39.5
     Current assets held for sale$631.7
Property, plant and equipment, net$186.8
Goodwill8.0
Brands, trademarks and other intangibles, net0.9
Other assets3.2
     Noncurrent assets held for sale$198.9
Current installments of long-term debt$0.1
Accounts payable143.1
Accrued payroll2.3
Other accrued liabilities19.3
     Current liabilities held for sale$164.8
Senior long-term debt, excluding current installments$0.1
Other noncurrent liabilities1.9
     Noncurrent liabilities held for sale$2.0
Corporate and Grocery & Snacks segments, respectively, at May 27, 2018 and $11.6 million and $14.6 million in our Corporate and Grocery & Snacks segments, respectively, at May 28, 2017.

7. INVESTMENTS IN JOINT VENTURES
On May 29, 2014,The total carrying value of our equity method investments at the Company, Cargill,end of fiscal 2018 and CHS, completed the formation of Ardent Mills. In connection with the formation, we contributed all of the2017 was $776.2 million and $741.3 million, respectively. These amounts are included in other assets of ConAgra Mills,and reflect our milling operations, including $49.0 million of cash, to Ardent Mills, we received a 44% ownership interest in Ardent Mills and Ardent Mills distributed $391.4 million50% ownership interests in cash to us as a return of capital. The contribution of the assets of ConAgra Mills in exchange for a non-controlling interest in the newly formedother joint venture is required to be accounted for at fair value, and accordingly, we recognized a gain of $625.6 million ($379.6 million after-tax) in fiscal 2015 in income from discontinued operations, to reflect the excess of the fair value of our interest over its carrying value at the time of the transfer. As part of the formation of Ardent Mills, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, pursuant to an agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice, we sold three flour milling facilities to Miller Milling Company LLC for $163.0 million. We received the cash proceeds from the sale of these flour milling facilities in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. In the first quarter of fiscal 2015, we used the net cash proceeds from the Ardent Mills transaction to repay debt. The business results were previously reflected in the Commercial Foods segment. The operating results of our legacy milling business, including the disposition of three mills aforementioned, are included as discontinued operations within our Consolidated Statement of Operations. The related assets and liabilities have been reclassified as assets and liabilities held for sale within our Consolidated Balance Sheet for the period presented prior to divestiture.
We recognized the 44% ownership interest in Ardent Mills at fair value, as of the date of the formation of the joint venture. We now recognize our proportionate share of the earnings of Ardent Mills under the equity method of accounting within results of continuing operations.ventures. Due to differences in fiscal reporting periods, we recognized the equity method investment earnings on a lag of approximately one month; and as a result,month.
In fiscal 2018, we recognizd only 11 monthshad purchases from our equity method investees of earnings $34.9 million. Total dividends received from Ardent Mills in fiscal 2015.
We also have potato joint ventures in our Commercial Foods segment and other equity method investments in our Consumer Foods segment. The carrying value offiscal 2018 were $62.5 million.
In fiscal 2017, we had purchases from our equity method investees of$41.8 million. Total dividends received from equity method investments at the end ofin fiscal 2015 and 2014 was $853.0 million and $131.2 million, respectively. These amounts are included in Other assets.2017 were $68.2 million.
In fiscal 2015,2016, we had sales to and purchases from our equity method investmentsinvestees of $9.5$1.6 million and $142.2$61.2 million, respectively. Total dividends received from equity method investments in fiscal 20152016 were $91.3$40.4 million.

58


We entered into transition services agreements in connection with the Ardent Mills formation and recognized $14.1$0.1 million and $9.7 million of income for the performance of transition services during fiscal 2015,2017 and 2016, respectively, classified within Selling, generalSG&A expenses.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and administrative expenses.May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Summarized combined financial information for our equity method investments on a 100% basis is as follows:
20152018 2017 2016
Net Sales:      
Ardent Mills$3,299.2
$3,344.1
 $3,180.0
 $3,395.3
Potato joint ventures885.4
Others167.3
198.8
 177.7
 167.2
Total net sales$4,351.9
$3,542.9
 $3,357.7
 $3,562.5
Gross margin553.7
Earnings after income taxes$279.0
Gross margin:    

Ardent Mills$386.5
 $340.3
 $339.2
Others34.8
 34.6
 32.8
Total gross margin$421.3
 $374.9
 $372.0
Earnings after income taxes:    

Ardent Mills$197.0
 $152.0
 $142.9
Others10.1
 10.1
 6.4
Total earnings after income taxes$207.1
 $162.1
 $149.3
May 31,
2015
May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
Ardent Mills:   
Current assets$1,422.6
$974.6
 $937.2
Noncurrent assets1,887.7
1,675.7
 1,694.2
Current liabilities603.9
355.6
 388.9
Noncurrent liabilities691.3
510.9
 518.0
Others:   
Current assets$76.4
 $75.5
Noncurrent assets15.5
 12.2
Current liabilities37.5
 44.5
Noncurrent liabilities0.1
 

8. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
Variable Interest Entities Consolidated
We own a 49.99% interest in Lamb Weston BSW, LLC ("Lamb Weston BSW"), a potato processing venture with Ochoa Ag Unlimited Foods, Inc. ("Ochoa"). We provide all sales and marketing services to Lamb Weston BSW. Under certain circumstances, we could be required to compensate Ochoa for lost profits resulting from significant production shortfalls ("production shortfalls"). Commencing on June 1, 2018, or on an earlier date under certain circumstances, we have a contractual right to purchase the remaining equity interest in Lamb Weston BSW from Ochoa (the "call option"). We are currently subject to a contractual obligation to purchase all of Ochoa's equity investment in Lamb Weston BSW at the option of Ochoa (the "put option"). The purchase prices under the call option and the put option (the "options") are based on the book value of Ochoa's equity interest at the date of exercise, as modified by an agreed-upon rate of return for the holding period of the investment balance. The agreed-upon rate of return varies depending on the circumstances under which any of the options are exercised. As of May 31, 2015, the price at which Ochoa had the right to put its equity interest to us was $41.6 million. This amount is presented within other noncurrent liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have determined that Lamb Weston BSW is a variable interest entity and that we are the primary beneficiary of the entity. Accordingly, we consolidate the financial statements of Lamb Weston BSW.
We hold a promissory note from Lamb Weston BSW, the balance of which was $36.1 million at May 31, 2015. The promissory note is due in December 2015. The promissory note is currently accruing interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 200 basis points with a floor of 3.25%. In addition, as of May 31, 2015, we provided lines of credit of up to $15.0 million to Lamb Weston BSW. Borrowings under the lines of credit bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 200 basis points with a floor of 3.25%. The amounts owed by Lamb Weston BSW to the Company are not reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, as they are eliminated in consolidation.
Our variable interests in Lamb Weston BSW include an equity investment in the venture, the options, the promissory note, certain fees paid to us by Lamb Weston BSW for sales and marketing services, the contingent obligation related to production shortfalls, and the lines of credit advanced to Lamb Weston BSW. Our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with this venture is equal to our equity investment in the venture, the balance of the promissory note extended to the venture, the amount, if any, advanced under the lines of credit, and the amount, if any, by which the put option exercise price exceeds the fair value of the noncontrolling interest in Lamb Weston BSW upon its exercise. Also, in the event of a production shortfall, we could be required to compensate Ochoa for lost profits. It is not possible to determine the maximum exposure to losses from the potential exercise of the put option or from potential production shortfalls. However, we do not expect to incur material losses resulting from these potential exposures.

59

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Due to the consolidation of these variable interest entities, we reflected the following in our Consolidated Balance Sheets:
 May 31,
2015
 May 25,
2014
Cash and cash equivalents$13.7
 $17.7
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts0.2
 
Inventories1.3
 1.4
Prepaid expenses and other current assets0.3
 0.3
Property, plant and equipment, net53.2
 51.8
Goodwill18.8
 18.8
Brands, trademarks and other intangibles, net6.0
 6.7
Total assets$93.5
 $96.7
Accounts payable$16.9
 $12.2
Accrued payroll0.7
 0.5
Other accrued liabilities0.6
 0.6
Other noncurrent liabilities (minority interest)31.3
 33.3
Total liabilities$49.5
 $46.6
The liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating the Lamb Weston BSW entity do not represent additional claims on our general assets. The creditors of Lamb Weston BSW have claims only on the assets of Lamb Weston BSW. The assets recognized as a result of consolidating Lamb Weston BSW are the property of the venture and are not available to us for any other purpose, other than as a secured lender under the promissory note and lines of credit.
Variable Interest Entities Not Consolidated
We also have variable interests in certain other entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities, but for which we are not the primary beneficiary. We do not consolidate the financial statements of these entities.
We hold a 50% interest in Lamb Weston RDO, a potato processing venture (see Note 7). We provide all sales and marketing services to Lamb Weston RDO. We receive a fee for these services based on a percentage of the net sales of the venture. We reflect the value of our ownership interest in this venture in other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, based upon the equity method of accounting. The balance of our investment was $14.6 million and $12.6 million at May 31, 2015 and May 25, 2014, respectively, representing our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with this venture. The capital structure of Lamb Weston RDO includes owners' equity of $29.2 million and term borrowings from banks of $41.6 million as of May 31, 2015. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of this venture.
We lease or leased certain office buildings from entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities. The lease agreements with these entities include fixed-price purchase options for the assets being leased. The lease agreements also contain contingent put options (the "lease put options") that allow or allowed the lessors to require us to purchase the buildings at the greater of original construction cost, or fair market value, without a lease agreement in place (the "put price") in certain limited circumstances. As a result of substantial impairment charges related to our divested Private Brands operations, these lease put options became exercisable. During fiscal 2016, we entered into a series of related transactions in which we exchanged a warehouse we owned in Indiana for two buildings and parcels of land that we leased representingas part of our only variable interestOmaha corporate offices. Concurrent with the asset exchange, the leases on the two Omaha corporate buildings, which were subject to contingent put options, were canceled. We recognized aggregate charges of $55.6 million for the early termination of these leases. We also entered into a lease for the warehouse in Indiana and we recorded a financing lease obligation of $74.2 million. During fiscal 2017, one of these lessor entities. These leaseslease agreements expired. As a result of this expiration, we reversed the applicable accrual and recognized a benefit of $6.7 million in SG&A expenses. During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we purchased two buildings that were subject to lease put options and recognized net losses totaling $48.2 million for the early exit of unfavorable lease contracts.
As of May 27, 2018, there was one remaining leased building subject to a lease put option for which the put option price exceeded the estimated fair value of the property by $8.2 million, of which we had accrued $1.2 million. We are amortizing the difference between the put price and the estimated fair value (without a lease agreement in place) of the property over the remaining lease term within SG&A expenses. This lease is accounted for as an operating leases,lease, and accordingly, there are no material assets orand liabilities, other than the accrued portion of the put price, associated with these entitiesthis entity included in our the

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have no material exposure to loss from our variable interests in these entities. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of these entities.this entity. In making this determination, we have considered, among other items, the terms of the lease agreements,agreement, the expected remaining useful liveslife of the assetsasset leased, and the capital structure of the lessor entities.entity.


60

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

9. GOODWILL AND OTHER IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for fiscal 20152018 and 20142017 was as follows:
 
Consumer
Foods
 
Commercial
Foods
 Private Brands Total
Balance as of May 26, 2013$3,760.5
 $865.0
 $3,793.2
 $8,418.7
Impairment
 
 (602.2) (602.2)
Currency translation and purchase accounting adjustments(12.0) 0.4
 23.6
 12.0
Balance as of May 25, 2014$3,748.5
 $865.4
 $3,214.6
 $7,828.5
Impairment
 
 (1,527.9) (1,527.9)
Acquisitions20.0
 23.8
 
 43.8
Currency translation and purchase accounting adjustments(25.4) (1.5) (17.2) (44.1)
Balance as of May 31, 2015$3,743.1
 $887.7
 $1,669.5
 $6,300.3
 Grocery & Snacks Refrigerated & Frozen International Foodservice Total
Balance as of May 29, 2016$2,273.1
 $1,028.9
 $442.8
 $571.1
 $4,315.9
Impairment
 
 (198.9) 
 (198.9)
Acquisitions166.0
 8.3
 
 
 174.3
Currency translation
 0.1
 3.9
 
 4.0
Balance as of May 28, 2017$2,439.1
 $1,037.3
 $247.8
 $571.1
 $4,295.3
Acquisitions155.2
 57.8
 
 
 213.0
Purchase accounting adjustments(1.5) 
 
 
 (1.5)
Currency translation
 0.6
 (4.9) 
 (4.3)
Balance as of May 27, 2018$2,592.8
 $1,095.7
 $242.9
 $571.1
 $4,502.5
Other identifiable intangible assets were as follows:
2015 20142018 2017
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
Non-amortizing intangible assets$1,000.5
 $
 $1,059.5
 $
$918.3
 $
 $829.7
 $
Amortizing intangible assets2,367.4
 337.9
 2,376.1
 230.7
579.4
 213.2
 573.5
 179.5
$3,367.9
 $337.9
 $3,435.6
 $230.7
$1,497.7
 $213.2
 $1,403.2
 $179.5
Because forecasted salesDuring fiscal 2018, we reclassified $3.0 million and profits$9.2 million of goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets, respectively, to noncurrent assets held for sale for all periods presented in conjunction with the then pending divestitures of the Del Monte® processed fruit and vegetable business in Canada and our Wesson® oil business.
During fiscal 2018, as a result of our annual impairment test for indefinite lived intangibles, we recognized impairment charges of $4.0 million for our HK Anderson®, Red Fork®, and Salpica® brands in our Grocery & Snacks segment. We also recognized an impairment charge of $0.8 million for our Aylmer® brand in our International segment.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, in anticipation of the Spinoff, we changed our reporting segments. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, we were required to determine new reporting units at a lower level (at the operating segment or one level lower, as applicable). When such a determination was made, we were required to perform a goodwill impairment analysis for each of the new reporting units.
We performed an assessment of impairment of goodwill for the Private Brands segment continued to fall below our expectations relative to our previous projections throughout fiscal 2015, we performed quantitative analyses of goodwill on certain of our Private Brands segmentnew Canadian reporting units inunit within the second, third, and fourth quarters of fiscal 2015.new International reporting segment. Estimating the fair value of individual reporting units requires us to make assumptions and estimates regarding our future plans and future industry and economic conditions. We estimated the future cash flows of eachthe Canadian reporting unit within the Private Brands segment and calculated the net present value of those estimated cash flows using a risk adjusted discount rate, in order to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit from the perspective of a market participant. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of 8%7.5% and 2%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We then compared the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the historical carrying value (including allocated assets and liabilities of certain shared and Corporate functions), and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than the carrying

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

value in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the assets and liabilities of this reporting unit in order to determine the implied fair value of goodwill. We recognized an impairment charge for the difference between the implied fair value of goodwill and the carrying value of goodwill. Accordingly, during the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we recorded charges totaling $139.2 million for the impairment of goodwill.
As part of the assessment of the fair value of each asset and liability within the Canadian reporting unit, with the assistance of the third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of our Canadian Del Monte® brand to be less than its carrying value. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, we also recognized an impairment charge during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 of $24.4 million to write-down the intangible asset to its estimated fair value.
We also performed an assessment of impairment of goodwill for the new Mexican reporting unit within the International reporting segment using similar methods to those described above. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of 8.5% and 3%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We determined that the estimated fair value of this reporting unit exceeded the carrying value of its net assets by approximately 5%. Accordingly, we did not recognize an impairment of the goodwill in the Mexican reporting unit.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2017, as a result of further deterioration in forecasted sales and profits primarily due to foreign exchange rates, we performed an additional assessment of impairment of goodwill for the new Mexican reporting unit. We used discount rates and terminal growth rates of 8.5% and 3%, respectively, to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows. We then compared the estimated fair value of eachthe reporting unit to the respective historical carrying value (including allocated assets and liabilities of certain shared and Corporate functions), and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than the carrying value for six reporting units withinin the Private Brands segment throughoutsecond quarter of fiscal 2015.2017. With the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the assets and liabilities of each of thesethis reporting unitsunit in order to determine the implied fair value of goodwill of each reporting unit.goodwill. We recognized an impairment chargescharge for the difference between the implied fair value of goodwill and the carrying value of goodwill within each reporting unit at the respective measurement dates.goodwill. Accordingly, during the second quarter of fiscal 2015,2017, we recorded charges totaling $1.53 billion$43.9 million for the impairment of goodwillgoodwill.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, in conjunction with our annual impairment testing, we adopted ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Private Brands segment. The following reporting units within Private Brands were impacted: $328.7 millionTest for Goodwill Impairment. As a result of further deterioration in Barsforecasted sales and Coordinated, $195.1 million in Cereal, $157.1 million in Pasta, $536.5 million in Snacks, and $174.4 million in Retail Bakery, and $136.1 million in Condiments.
During fiscal 2014,profits, we recorded a $602.2 million charge for theperformed an additional assessment of impairment of goodwill infor the Private Brands segment. The followingnew Mexican reporting units within Private Brands were impacted: $66.4 million in Barsunit. We used discount rates and Coordinated, $154.6 million in Cereal, $94.2 million in Pasta, $231.6 million in Snacks,terminal growth rates of 9.0% and $55.4 million in Retail Bakery.
In3%, respectively, to calculate the casepresent value of four reporting units within the Private Brands segment: Cereal, Pasta, Snacks, and Retail Bakery,estimated future cash flows. We then compared the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the historical carrying value (including allocated assets and liabilities of certain amortizing intangible assets (customer relationships) used in step twoshared and Corporate functions), and determined that the fair value of our impairment analysisthe reporting unit was substantially less than the carrying value in the fourth quarter of those assets and, asfiscal 2017. With the assistance of a result,third-party valuation specialist, we estimated the fair value of the reporting unit. We recognized an impairment charge of $15.8 million, equal to the difference between the carrying value of the Cereal, Pasta, Snacks, and Retail Bakery reporting units exceeded the estimated fair values of those reporting units, even after the previously described goodwill impairment charges were recorded. We assess the recoverability of these amortizing intangibles at the segment level and expect to recover the carrying value over their remaining lives (on an undiscounted basis) and, accordingly, no impairments were required to be recognized.

61

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Following the impairment charges recorded in fiscal 2015, the carrying value of goodwill in our Private Brands reporting units included $269.3 million for Cereal, $588.2 million for Pasta, $276.5 million for Snacks, and $535.5 million for Retail Bakery. All of the goodwill for the Bars and Coordinated and Condiments reporting units was impaired as of the end of fiscal 2015. If the future performance of one or more of the reporting units within the Private Brands segment falls short of our expectations or if there are significant changes in risk-adjusted discount rates due to changes in market conditions, we could be required to recognize additional, material impairment charges in future periods.unit.
In fiscal 2015,2017, due to declining sales of certain brands, we elected to perform a quantitative impairment test for indefinite lived intangibles.intangibles of those brands. During fiscal 2015,2017, we recognized impairment charges of $43.7$7.1 million for our Del Monte®brand and $5.5 million for our Aylmer® brand in our Private Brands segment to write-down various brands.International segment. We also recognized impairment charges of $4.8$67.1 million in our Consumer Foods segment for our PoppycockChef Boyardee® brand and a $0.3$1.1 million impairment chargefor our Fiddle Faddle® brand in our Commercial Foods segment for a small brand.Grocery & Snacks segment.
InDuring fiscal 2014,2016, we also elected to perform a quantitative impairment test for indefinite lived intangibles. Weintangibles and recognized an impairment chargescharge of $72.5$50.1 million in our Consumer FoodsGrocery & Snacks segment primarily for our Chef Boyardee® brand andbrand.
See Note 6 for a $3.2 million impairment charge in our Private Brands segment for two small brands. We also recognized a $3.2 million impairment charge for an amortizable technology license in Corporate expenses in fiscal 2014.discussion of impairments related to discontinued operations.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we completed the sale of Medallion Foods within the Private Brands segment. Related allocated goodwill and amortizingNon-amortizing intangible assets are comprised of $17.5 millionbrands and $14.4 million, respectively, were reclassified to noncurrent assets held for sale. During fiscal 2014, we recognized impairments of $17.5 million and $7.9 million, of the allocated goodwill and amortizing intangible assets, respectively, which are reflected in discontinued operations.trademarks.
Amortizing intangible assets, carrying a remaining weighted average life of approximately 2114 years, are principally composed of customer relationships, licensing arrangements, and acquired intellectual property. For fiscal 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, we recognized amortization expense of $34.9 million, $108.5 million, $111.433.6 million, and $55.7$34.6 million,, respectively. Based on amortizing assets recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of May 31, 201527, 2018, amortization expense is estimated to average $107.932.8 million for each of the next five years, with a high expense of $109.033.3 million in fiscal year 20162019 and decreasing to a low expense of $106.130.9 million in fiscal year 2020.2023.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

In the first quarter of fiscal 2016, we entered into an agreement for the use of certain intellectual property and recorded an amortizing intangible asset of $92.8 million, for which cash payments of $14.4 million, $14.9 million, and $10.4 million were made in the first quarter of fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Remaining payments will be made over a four-year period.

10. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated on the basis of weighted average outstanding shares of common shares.stock. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed on the basis of basic weighted average outstanding shares of common sharesstock adjusted for the dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock unit awards, and other dilutive securities. In periods when we recognize a net loss, we exclude the impact of outstanding stock awards from the diluted loss per share calculation, as their inclusion would have an anti-dilutive effect.

62

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The following table reconciles the income and average share amounts used to compute both basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:
2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Net income (loss) available to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders:     
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders$(619.2) $161.7
 $686.2
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax, attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders366.6
 141.4
 87.7
Net income (loss) attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders$(252.6) $303.1
 $773.9
Net income (loss) available to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders:     
Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders$794.1
 $544.1
 $126.6
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax, attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders14.3
 95.2
 (803.6)
Net income (loss) attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders$808.4
 $639.3
 $(677.0)
Less: Increase in redemption value of noncontrolling interests in excess of earnings allocated1.7
 1.7
 1.6

 0.8
 4.8
Net income (loss) available to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders$(254.3) $301.4
 $772.3
Net income (loss) available to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders$808.4
 $638.5
 $(681.8)
Weighted average shares outstanding:          
Basic weighted average shares outstanding426.1
 421.3
 410.8
403.9
 431.9
 434.4
Add: Dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock unit awards, and other dilutive securities
 6.2
 6.8
3.5
 4.1
 4.1
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding426.1
 427.5
 417.6
407.4
 436.0
 438.5
At the end ofFor fiscal 2015, all dilutive2018, 2017, and 2016, there were 1.3 million, 0.8 million, and 0.4 million stock options restricted stock unit awards, and other dilutive securities outstanding, of 5.2 million shares were excluded from the computation of shares contingently issuable upon exercise as we recognized a net loss. At the end of fiscal 2014, there were 3.1 million stock options outstandingrespectively, that were excluded from the computation of diluted weighted average shares contingently issuable upon exercise ofbecause the stock options because exercise prices exceeded the average market value of our common stock during the period. At the end of fiscal 2013, there were no stock options outstanding that were excluded from the computation of shares contingently issuable upon exercise of the stock options.effect was antidilutive.

11. INVENTORIES
The major classes of inventories were as follows:
May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
Raw materials and packaging$561.3
 $498.6
$206.2
 $182.1
Work in process134.4
 118.6
92.4
 91.9
Finished goods1,380.1
 1,335.3
651.1
 606.6
Supplies and other125.4
 124.5
47.4
 47.3
Total$2,201.2
 $2,077.0
$997.1
 $927.9


63


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015,27, 2018, May 25, 2014,28, 2017, and May 26, 201329, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

12. OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
Other noncurrent liabilities consisted of:
May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
Postretirement health care and pension obligations$809.0
 $735.0
$261.7
 $709.8
Noncurrent income tax liabilities1,588.9
 1,510.1
490.4
 466.5
Self-insurance liabilities100.1
 107.6
27.1
 29.0
Environmental liabilities (see Note 17)55.0
 63.0
56.0
 54.7
Technology agreement liability (see Note 9)42.7
 56.4
Other288.0
 256.4
187.3
 212.4
2,841.0
 2,672.1
$1,065.2
 $1,528.8
Less current portion(107.9) (72.7)
$2,733.1
 $2,599.4

13. CAPITAL STOCK
We haveThe total number of shares we are authorized to issue is 1,218,050,000 shares, which shares may be issued as follows: 1,200,000,000 shares of preferredcommon stock, as follows:
par value $5.00 per share; 150,000 shares of Class B—$50B Preferred Stock, par value; 150,000value $50.00 per share; 250,000 shares
of Class C—$100C Preferred Stock, par value; 250,000value $100.00 per share; 1,100,000 shares
of Class D—withoutD Preferred Stock, no par value; 1,100,000value per share; and 16,550,000 shares
of Class E—withoutE Preferred Stock, no par value; 16,550,000 shares
value per share. There were no preferred shares issued or outstanding as of May 31, 201527, 2018.
We have repurchased our shares of common stock from time to time after considering market conditions and in accordance with repurchase limits authorized by our Board of Directors. In December 2011,October 2016, our Board of Directors approved a $750.0 million$1.25 billion increase to our share repurchase authorization. The Board of Directors approved further increases to the share repurchase program.program of $1.0 billion each in May 2017 and May 2018. We repurchased 1.427.4 million shares of our common stock for approximately $50.0$967.3 million 2.9and 25.1 million shares of our common stock for approximately $100.0 million, and 9.1 million shares of our common stock for approximately $245.0 million$1.0 billion in fiscal 2015, 2014,2018 and 2013,2017, respectively, under this program.

14. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
In accordance with stockholder-approved plans, we issue share-based payments under various stock-based compensation arrangements, including stock options, restricted stock units, cash-settled restricted stock units, performance shares, and other share-based awards. The shares to be delivered under the plan may consist, in whole or part, of treasury stock or authorized but unissued stock, not reserved for any other purpose.
On September 19, 2014, the stockholders approved the ConAgra FoodsConagra Brands 2014 Stock Plan (the "Plan"), which was amended on December 11, 2017. As amended, the Plan authorized the issuance of up to 30.040.3 million shares of ConAgra FoodsConagra Brands common stock as well as certain shares of stock subject to outstanding awards under predecessor stock plans that expire, lapse, are cancelled, terminated, forfeited, or otherwise become unexercisable. At May 31, 201527, 2018, approximately 30.242.5 million shares were reserved for granting additional options, restricted stock units, cash-settled restricted stock units, performance shares, or other share-based awards.
Fiscal 2015All amounts below are of continuing operations and fiscal 2014 and 2013 amounts are of continuing and discontinued operations.
Stock Option Plan
We have stockholder-approved stock option plans that provide for granting of options to employees for the purchase of common stock at prices equal to the fair value at the date of grant. Options become exercisable under various vesting schedules (typically three years) and generally expire seven to ten years after the date of grant.

64

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for stock options granted:
 2015 2014 2013
Expected volatility (%)17.45 21.13 22.95
Dividend yield (%)3.10 3.24 3.77
Risk-free interest rates (%)1.58 1.37 0.57
Expected life of stock option (years)4.92 4.91 4.80
The expected volatility is based on the historical market volatility of our stock over the expected life of the stock options granted. The expected life represents the period of time that the awards are expected to be outstanding and is based on the contractual term of each instrument, taking into account employees’ historical exercise and termination behavior.
A summary of the option activity as of May 31, 2015 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below:
Options
Number
of Options
(in Millions)
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value (in
Millions)
Outstanding at May 25, 201418.6
 $26.15
    
Granted4.4
 $31.71
    
Exercised(6.4) $23.77
   $69.5
Forfeited(1.0) $31.51
    
Expired(0.1) $34.54
    
Outstanding at May 31, 201515.5
 $28.28
 5.65 $160.4
Exercisable at May 31, 20158.9
 $25.29
 3.37 $117.9
We recognize compensation expense using the straight-line method over the requisite service period. During fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013, the Company granted 4.4 million options, 3.6 million options, and 3.9 million options, respectively, with a weighted average grant date value of $3.36, $4.71, and $2.93, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $69.5 million, $46.9 million, and $77.2 million for fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. The closing market price of our common stock on the last trading day of fiscal 2015 was $38.61 per share.
Compensation expense for stock option awards totaled $12.4 million, $15.3 million, and $13.5 million for fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. Included in the compensation expense for stock option awards for fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013 was $1.4 million, $2.7 million, and $0.8 million, respectively, related to stock options granted by a subsidiary in the subsidiary's shares to the subsidiary's employees. The tax benefit related to the stock option expense for fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013 was $4.8 million, $5.7 million, and $5.0 million, respectively.
At May 31, 2015, we had $11.9 million of total unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to stock options that will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.4 years.
Cash received from option exercises for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2015May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013 was $150.2 million, $104.6 million, and $259.8 million, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from option exercises totaled $26.7 million, $17.4 million, and $28.7 million for fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.
Share Unit Plans
In accordance with stockholder-approved plans, we issue stock under various stock-based compensation arrangements, including restricted stock units, cash-settled restricted stock units, and other share-based awards (“("share units”units"). These awards generally have requisite service periods of three years. Under each arrangement, stock is issued without direct cost to the employee. We estimate the fair value of the share units based upon the market price of our stock at the date of grant. Certain share unit grants do not provide for the payment of dividend equivalents to the participant during the requisite service period (vesting period). For those grants, the value of the grants is reduced by the net present value of the foregone dividend equivalent

65

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

payments. We recognize compensation expense for share unit awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.period, accounting for forfeitures as they occur. All cash-settled restricted stock units are marked-to-market and presented within

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

other current and noncurrent liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The compensation expense for our stock-settled share unit awards totaled $21.0$21.8 million, $26.118.2 million, and $26.725.1 million for fiscal 20152018, 20142017, and 20132016, respectively, including discontinued operations of $1.4 million and $3.9 million for fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively. The tax benefit related to the stock-settled share unit award compensation expense for fiscal 20152018, 20142017, and 20132016 was $8.1$7.2 million, $9.87.0 million, and $9.99.6 million, respectively. The compensation expense for our cash-settled share unit awards totaled $29.2$5.8 million, $12.4$20.9 million, and $8.033.9 million for fiscal 20152018, 20142017, and 2013,2016, respectively, including discontinued operations of $2.6 million and $7.4 million for fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively. The tax benefit related to the cash-settled share unit award compensation expense for fiscal 20152018, 20142017, and 20132016 was $11.2$1.9 million, $4.6$8.0 million, and $3.013.0 million, respectively. No cash-settled share unit awards were granted in fiscal 2018.
The following table summarizes the nonvested share units as of May 31, 201527, 2018 and changes during the fiscal year then ended:
Stock-settled Cash-settledStock-settled Cash-settled
Share Units
Share Units
(in millions)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
 
Share Units
(in millions)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Share Units
(in Millions)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
 
Share Units
(in Millions)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Nonvested share units at May 25, 20143.03
 $28.71
 1.58
 $30.60
Nonvested share units at May 28, 20171.56
 $31.59
 1.21
 $30.52
Granted0.93
 $31.71
 0.89
 $30.89
0.87
 $34.16
 
 $
Vested/Issued(1.50) $26.61
 (0.05) $27.35
(0.53) $26.58
 (0.42) $22.86
Forfeited(0.30) $30.58
 (0.25) $31.02
(0.12) $33.77
 (0.08) $34.60
Nonvested share units at May 31, 20152.16
 $31.20
 2.17
 $30.74
Nonvested share units at May 27, 20181.78
 $34.20
 0.71
 $34.58
During fiscal 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, we granted 0.9 million, 0.90.6 million,, and 1.0 million stock-settled share units, respectively, with a weighted average grant date value of $31.71, $36.22,$34.16, $46.79, and $25.59,$43.64, respectively. During fiscal 2015, 2014,2017 and 2013,2016, we granted 0.9 million, 0.80.4 million and 0.90.8 million cash-settled share units, respectively, with a weighted average grant date value of $30.89, $36.89,$48.07 and $24.74,$44.48, respectively.
The total intrinsic value of stock-settled share units vested was $46.6$18.5 million, $46.4$27.0 million,, and $24.3$48.8 million during fiscal 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, respectively. The total intrinsic value of cash-settled share units vested was $1.6$14.2 million, $24.0 million, and $44.9 million during fiscal 2015.2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
At May 31, 2015,27, 2018, we had $23.2$22.8 million and $28.2$5.2 million of total unrecognized compensation expense net of estimated forfeitures, that will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8 years and 1.7 years,1.0 year, related to stock-settled share unit awards and cash-settled share unit awards, respectively.
Performance-Based Share Plan
Performance shares are granted to selected executives and other key employees with vesting contingent upon meeting various Company-wide performance goals. The performance goalsgoal for one-third of the target number of performance shares for the three-year performance period ending in fiscal 2015 are2018 (the "2018 performance period") is based uponon our operating cash flowfiscal 2016 EBITDA return on operations, a measurecapital, subject to certain adjustments. Another one-third of operating cash flow as a percentagethe target number of investedperformance shares granted for the 2018 performance period is based on our fiscal 2017 EBITDA return on capital, and revenue growth, each measured over a defined performance period.subject to certain adjustments. The fiscal 2017 EBITDA return on capital target, when set, excluded the results of Lamb Weston. The performance goalsgoal for the last one-third of the target number of performance periodsshares granted for the 2018 performance period is based on our fiscal 2018 diluted earnings per share ("EPS") compound annual growth rate ("CAGR"), subject to certain adjustments. In addition, for certain participants, all performance shares for the 2018 performance period are subject to an overarching EPS goal that must be met in each fiscal year of the 2018 performance period before any pay out can be made to such participants on the performance shares.
The performance goal for one-third of the target number of performance shares for the three-year performance period ending in fiscal 2016 and2019 (the "2019 performance period") is based on our fiscal 2017 are based upon our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization ("EBITDA")EBITDA return on capital, subject to certain adjustments. The fiscal 2017 EBITDA return on capital target, when set, excluded the results of Lamb Weston. The performance goal for the final two-thirds of the target number of performance shares granted for the 2019 performance period is based on our diluted EPS CAGR, subject to certain adjustments, measured over the two-year period ending in fiscal 2019. In addition,

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and revenue growth,May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

for certain participants, all performance shares for the 2019 performance period are subject to an overarching EPS goal that must be met in each fiscal year of the 2019 performance period before any pay out can be made to such participants on the performance shares.
The performance goal for the three-year performance period ending in fiscal 2020 is based on our diluted EPS CAGR, subject to certain adjustments, measured over the defined performance period. The awards actually earned will range from zero to two hundred twenty percent of the targeted number ofIn addition, for certain participants, all performance shares for the 2020 performance period are subject to an overarching EPS goal that must be met in each fiscal year of the performance periods. Subject to overarching minimum earnings per share performance requirements for executive officers, a payout equal to 25 percent of approved target incentive is required to be paid out for each2020 performance period as applicable, if we achieve a threshold level of cash flow returnbefore any pay out can be made to such participants on operations for the performance period ending in fiscal 2015, and a threshold level of EBITDA return on capital for the performance periods ending in fiscal 2016 and 2017. shares.
Awards, if earned, will be paid in shares of our common stock. Subject to limited exceptions set forth in the performance share plan, any shares earned will be distributed atafter the end of the performance period. Theperiod, and only if the participant continues to be employed with the Company through the date of distribution. For awards where performance against the performance target has not been certified, the value of the performance shares is adjusted based upon the market price of our common stock and current forecasted performance against the performance targets at the end of each reporting period and amortized as compensation expense over the vesting period.

66

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) Forfeitures are accounted for as they occur.
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

A summary of the activity for performance share awards as of May 31, 201527, 2018 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below:
Performance Shares
Shares
(in  Millions)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Share Units
(in Millions)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Nonvested performance shares at May 25, 20141.17
 $28.27
Nonvested performance shares at May 28, 20170.86
 $29.23
Granted0.50
 $30.89
0.48
 $33.82
Adjustments for performance results attained and dividend equivalents0.04
 $26.11
0.01
 $22.98
Vested/Issued(0.45) $26.10
(0.33) $24.08
Forfeited(0.20) $31.50
(0.02) $33.69
Nonvested performance shares at May 31, 20151.06
 $29.74
Nonvested performance shares at May 27, 20181.00
 $33.40
The compensation expense for our performance share awards totaled $5.7$11.8 million, $6.5$13.3 million,, and $19.9$14.2 million for fiscal 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, respectively. The tax benefit related to the compensation expense for fiscal 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 20132016 was $2.2$3.9 million, $2.4$5.1 million,, and $7.4$5.4 million,, respectively.
The total intrinsic value of share units vested (including shares paid in lieu of dividends) during fiscal 20152018, 2017, and 20142016 was $13.9$11.2 million, $2.8 million, and $10.4$12.7 million,, respectively.
Based on estimates at May 31, 2015,27, 2018, the Company had $2.9$15.6 million of total unrecognized compensation expense net of estimated forfeitures, related to performance shares that will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8 years.
Accounting guidance requiresStock Option Plan
We have stockholder-approved stock option plans that provide for granting of options to employees for the benefitspurchase of common stock at prices equal to the fair value at the date of grant. Options become exercisable under various vesting schedules (typically three years) and generally expire seven to ten years after the date of grant. No options were granted in fiscal 2018.
The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for stock options granted:
 2017 2016
Expected volatility (%)19.15 17.88
Dividend yield (%)2.33 2.74
Risk-free interest rates (%)1.03 1.60
Expected life of stock option (years)4.94 4.96

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The expected volatility is based on the historical market volatility of our stock over the expected life of the stock options granted. The expected life represents the period of time that the awards are expected to be outstanding and is based on the contractual term of each instrument, taking into account employees' historical exercise and termination behavior.
A summary of the option activity as of May 27, 2018 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below:
Options
Number
of Options
(in Millions)
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value (in
Millions)
Outstanding at May 28, 20176.3
 $27.12
    
Exercised(1.1) $22.28
   $15.8
Forfeited(0.1) $34.78
    
Outstanding at May 27, 20185.1
 $28.11
 5.76 $47.6
Exercisable at May 27, 20184.0
 $26.34
 5.14 $44.4
We recognize compensation expense using the straight-line method over the requisite service period, accounting for forfeitures as they occur. During fiscal 2017 and 2016, the Company granted 1.1 million options and 1.6 million options, respectively, with a weighted average grant date value of $6.12 and $5.08, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $15.8 million, $29.8 million, and $165.6 million for fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. The closing market price of our common stock on the last trading day of fiscal 2018 was $37.41 per share.
Compensation expense for stock option awards totaled $4.2 million, $6.2 million, and $9.4 million for fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, including discontinued operations of $0.2 million and $0.8 million for fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively. Included in the compensation expense for stock option awards for fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016 was $0.4 million, $0.9 million, and $1.0 million, respectively, related to stock options granted by a subsidiary in the subsidiary's shares to the subsidiary's employees. The tax benefit related to the stock option expense for fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016 was $1.4 million, $2.4 million, and $3.6 million, respectively.
At May 27, 2018, we had $2.3 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options that will be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.9 years.
Cash received from option exercises for the fiscal years ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016 was $25.1 million, $84.4 million, and $228.7 million, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation expense to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow in our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. As a result, infrom option exercises totaled $5.3 million, $19.5 million, and $57.3 million for fiscal 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013, our net operating cash flows decreased and our net financing cash flows increased by approximately $24.0 million, $18.9 million, and $21.3 million,2016, respectively.

15. PRE-TAX INCOME AND INCOME TAXES
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the "Tax Act") was enacted into law on December 22, 2017. The changes to U.S. tax law include, but are not limited to, (1) reducing the federal statutory income tax rate from 35% to 21%; (2) requiring companies to pay a one-time transition tax on certain unrepatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries; (3) repealing the exception for deductibility of performance-based compensation to covered employees, along with expanding the number of covered employees; and (4) allowing immediate expensing of machinery and equipment contracted for purchase after September 27, 2017.
The Tax Act also establishes new tax provisions that will affect our fiscal year 2019, including, but not limited to, (1) eliminating the deduction for domestic manufacturing activities; (2) generally eliminating U.S. federal income taxes on dividends from foreign subsidiaries; (3) establishing a new minimum tax on Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income ("GILTI"), a new Base Erosion Anti-Abuse Tax, and a new U.S. corporate deduction for Foreign-Derived Intangible Income.
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission released Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 118, which allows for a measurement period up to one year after the enactment date of the Tax Act to finalize related income tax impacts. Although our accounting for the impact of the Tax Act is incomplete, we have made reasonable estimates and recorded provisional amounts for items impacted including, among others, the following:

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

We remeasured deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse and recorded a provisional net benefit of $241.6 million. In addition, as a result of the Tax Act we recorded a provisional benefit of $3.2 million related to the release of valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets that are more likely than not to be realized. The release of valuation allowance was refined by a $0.5 million increase as of May 27, 2018 from our initial estimate made in our third quarter of fiscal 2018 in accordance with SAB 118.
We computed a provisional tax of approximately $19.8 million related to the application of the one-time transition tax on the net accumulated post-1986 earnings and profits of foreign subsidiaries. The transition tax was refined by a $4.6 million increase as of May 27, 2018 from our initial estimate made in our third quarter of fiscal 2018 in accordance with SAB 118.
We have not yet completed our analysis of the GILTI tax rules and are still evaluating whether to make a policy election to treat the GILTI tax as a period expense or to provide U.S. deferred taxes on certain foreign differences between the financial statement and tax basis of foreign assets and liabilities. At May 27, 2018, we did not record a deferred tax liability for these differences. We will continue to analyze the impact of GILTI as more guidance is issued and a decision will be made during fiscal year 2019 on whether to treat the GILTI as a period cost or a deferred tax item.
As a result of our fiscal year end, the lower U.S. statutory federal income tax rate resulted in a blended U.S. federal statutory rate of 29.3% for our fiscal year ending May 27, 2018. It is expected to be 21% for fiscal years beginning after May 27, 2018.
Pre-tax income from continuing operations (including equity method investment earnings) consisted of the following:
 2015 2014 2013
United States$(444.5) $276.9
 $962.6
Canada9.1
 57.2
 49.2
Foreign - other62.0
 59.7
 48.5
 $(373.4) $393.8
 $1,060.3
 2018 2017 2016
United States$902.5
 $883.5
 $136.9
Foreign69.6
 (82.8) 38.0
 $972.1
 $800.7
 $174.9

The provision for income taxes included the following:
67

 2018 2017 2016
Current     
Federal$153.1
 $201.5
 $206.5
State17.8
 6.7
 31.0
Foreign32.5
 6.5
 8.6
 203.4
 214.7
 246.1
Deferred     
Federal(43.7) 62.1
 (161.5)
State17.4
 (5.3) (38.9)
Foreign(2.5) (16.8) 0.7
 (28.8) 40.0
 (199.7)
 $174.6
 $254.7
 $46.4

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015,27, 2018, May 25, 2014,28, 2017, and May 26, 201329, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The provision for income taxes included the following:
 2015 2014 2013
Current     
Federal$301.4
 $312.1
 $149.0
State28.3
 29.2
 23.5
Canada8.1
 11.4
 11.4
Foreign - other21.2
 10.9
 12.4
 359.0
 363.6
 196.3
Deferred     
Federal(88.6) (76.1) 160.9
State(31.2) (56.7) 4.5
Canada2.8
 3.3
 1.6
Foreign - other(8.0) (14.0) (1.4)
 (125.0) (143.5) 165.6
 $234.0
 $220.1
 $361.9
Income taxes computed by applying the U.S. Federal statutory rates to income from continuing operations before income taxes are reconciled to the provision for income taxes set forth in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows:
2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Computed U.S. Federal income taxes$(130.7) $137.8
 $371.1
$285.3
 $280.2
 $61.2
State income taxes, net of U.S. Federal tax impact23.2
 19.3
 17.1
18.0
 22.4
 (6.4)
Remeasurement of U.S. deferred taxes(241.6) 
 
Transition tax on foreign earnings19.8
 
 
Tax credits and domestic manufacturing deduction(35.6) (27.5) (20.4)(20.6) (19.8) (16.5)
Audit adjustments and settlements(5.2) (19.1) 0.5
Effect of taxes booked on foreign operations(13.7) (20.6) (11.5)
Statute lapses on previously reserved items(9.4) (7.4) (4.8)
Federal rate differential on legal reserve12.6
 
 
Goodwill and intangible impairments429.1
 185.2
 

 104.7
 
Change in legal structure and other state elections
 (23.5) 
Change in estimate related to tax methods used for certain international sales, federal credits, and state credits.(11.1) (20.9) 
Stock compensation(5.7) (18.8) 
Change of valuation allowance on capital loss carryforward78.6
 (84.1) 
Change in estimate related to tax methods used for certain international sales, federal credits, and state credits
 (8.0) 6.0
Other(12.6) (3.2) 9.9
28.2
 (21.9) 2.1
$234.0
 $220.1
 $361.9
$174.6
 $254.7
 $46.4
Income taxes paid, net of refunds, were $301.3$164.1 million,, $253.6 $213.0 million,, and $249.0$291.3 million in fiscal 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, respectively.

68

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The tax effect of temporary differences and carryforwards that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following:
May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
Assets Liabilities Assets LiabilitiesAssets Liabilities Assets Liabilities
Property, plant and equipment$
 $546.9
 $
 $553.6
$
 $141.0
 $
 $216.6
Goodwill, trademarks and other intangible assets
 1,218.5
 
 1,345.4

 406.2
 
 623.4
Accrued expenses27.8
 
 34.8
 
15.5
 
 20.2
 
Compensation related liabilities81.7
 
 69.2
 
34.1
 
 63.9
 
Pension and other postretirement benefits306.2
 
 279.2
 
45.8
 
 275.2
 
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries
 211.6
 
 7.7

 165.8
 
 237.8
Derivative cash flow hedge
 0.6
 
 0.8
Other liabilities that will give rise to future tax deductions135.5
 
 150.7
 
109.7
 
 117.9
 
Net operating loss carryforwards43.0
 
 56.0
 
Net capital and operating loss carryforwards762.5
 
 1,112.5
 
Other117.2
 60.2
 124.7
 25.7
26.3
 6.1
 60.0
 6.3
711.4
 2,037.8
 714.6
 1,933.2
993.9
 719.1
 1,649.7
 1,084.1
Less: Valuation allowance(41.5) 
 (43.3) 
(739.6) 
 (1,013.4) 
Net deferred taxes$669.9
 $2,037.8
 $671.3
 $1,933.2
$254.3
 $719.1
 $636.3
 $1,084.1
At May 31, 2015 and May 25, 2014, net deferred tax assets of $129.9 million and $107.7 million, respectively, were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets. At May 31, 2015 and May 25, 2014, net deferred tax liabilities of $1.50 billion and $1.37 billion, respectively, were included in other noncurrent liabilities.
The liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits at May 31, 201527, 2018 was $73.7$32.5 million,, excluding a related liability of $26.5$7.7 million for gross interest and penalties. Included in the balance at May 31, 2015 are $8.0 million of tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period. Any associated interest and penalties imposed would affect the tax rate. As of May 25, 2014,28, 2017, our gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits was $84.9$39.3 million,, excluding a related liability of $29.6$6.0 million for gross interest and penalties. Included in the balance at May 25, 2014 are $8.2 million of tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. Interest and penalties recognized in the Consolidated StatementStatements of EarningsOperations was an expense of $1.6 million in fiscal 2018, a benefit of $3.1$0.3 million in fiscal 2015, $1.32017, and a benefit of $0.2 million in fiscal 2014 and $1.2 million in fiscal 2013.2016.
The net amount of unrecognized tax benefits at May 31, 201527, 2018 and May 25, 201428, 2017 that, if recognized, would favorably impact our effective tax rate was $43.2$27.8 million and $50.8$31.6 million,, respectively.
We accrue interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as part of income tax expense.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

We conduct business and file tax returns in numerous countries, states, and local jurisdictions. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”("IRS") has completed its audit for tax years through fiscal 20142015 and all resulting significant items for fiscal 20142015 and prior years have been settled with the IRS. Other major jurisdictions where we conduct business generally have statutes of limitations ranging from 3three to 5five years.
We estimate that it is reasonably possible that the amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by up to $8$15.3 million over the next twelve months due to various Federal, state, and foreign audit settlements and the expiration of statutes of limitations.

69

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) Of this amount, approximately $6.7 million would reverse through results of discontinued operations.
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The change in the unrecognized tax benefits for the year ended May 31, 201527, 2018 was:
Beginning balance on May 25, 2014$84.9
Beginning balance on May 28, 2017$39.3
Increases from positions established during prior periods4.1
14.5
Decreases from positions established during prior periods(1.7)(11.5)
Increases from positions established during the current period4.4
3.5
Decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities(6.3)(10.3)
Reductions resulting from lapse of applicable statute of limitation(10.0)(2.9)
Other adjustments to liability(1.7)(0.1)
Ending balance on May 31, 2015$73.7
Ending balance on May 27, 2018$32.5
We have approximately $60.9$27.5 million of foreign net operating loss carryforwards ($37.0($10.7 million will expire between fiscal 20162019 and 20362039 and $23.9$16.8 million have no expiration dates) and $17.7$19.4 million of Federal net operating loss carryforwards which expire betweenin fiscal 2027 and 2031.2037. Federal capital loss carryforwards related to the Private Brands divestiture of approximately $2.8 billion will expire in fiscal 2021. Included in net deferred tax liabilities are $42.6$35.7 million of tax effected state net operating loss carryforwards which expire in various years ranging from fiscal 20162019 to 2035. Substantially all2028 and $173.7 million of our foreign tax credits willeffected state capital loss carryforwards related to the divestiture of Private Brands, the vast majority of which expire in fiscal 2025.2021. Foreign tax credits of $1.0 million will expire between fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2028. State tax credits of approximately $36.3$10.1 million will expire in various years ranging from fiscal 20162019 to 2019.2028.
We have recognized a valuation allowance for the portion of the net operating loss carryforwards, capital loss carryforwards, tax credit carryforwards, and other deferred tax assets we believe are not more likely than not to be realized. The net impact on income tax expense related to changeschange in the valuation allowance for fiscal 20152018 was a benefitdecrease of $1.8 million.$273.8 million. For fiscal 20142017 and 2013,2016, changes in the valuation allowance were a benefitdecrease of $1.5$420.1 million and a chargean increase of $1.1 million,$1.4 billion, respectively. The current year change principally relates to decreasesremeasurement of deferred tax assets and corresponding valuation allowances due to tax reform and an adjustment to the valuation allowances for state and foreign net operating losses and credits.
As of May 31, 2015, undistributed earningsallowance on capital loss due to the termination of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries amounted to approximatelysales agreement for the $660 millionWesson. Those earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested and accordingly, no U.S. federal income taxes have been provided thereon. We® oil business.
Historically, we have not provided U.S. deferred taxes on the cumulative undistributed earnings of non-U.S. affiliatesour foreign subsidiaries. During fiscal 2018, we determined that previously undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries no longer meet the requirements for indefinite reinvestment under applicable accounting guidance and, associated companies thattherefore, recognized $5.9 million of income tax expense in fiscal 2018. We continue to believe the Company considers to beremaining undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries are indefinitely reinvested indefinitely.and therefore have not provided any additional U.S. deferred taxes. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of U.S. income taxes that would be incurred in the event that we were to repatriate all the cumulative earnings of non-U.S. affiliates and associated companies. DeferredAccordingly, deferred taxes arewill be provided for earnings of non-U.S. affiliates and associated companies when we determine that such earnings are no longer indefinitely reinvested.

16. OPERATING LEASES
We lease certain facilities, land, and transportation equipment under agreements that expire at various dates. Rent expense under all operating leases from continuing operations was $62.5 million, $178.2 million, $177.671.2 million, and $156.677.4 million in fiscal 20152018, 20142017, and 20132016, respectively. These amounts are inclusive of certain charges recognized at the cease-use date for remaining lease payments associated with exited properties.


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

A summary of non-cancellable operating lease commitments for fiscal years following May 31, 201527, 2018, was as follows:
2016$86.3
201782.0
201870.3
201956.7
$35.6
202040.6
25.2
202122.3
202217.9
202315.8
Later years184.5
82.3
$520.4
$199.1

At May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, assets under capital and financing leases totaling $82.9 million, net of accumulated depreciation of $32.1 million, and $119.5 million, net of $47.7 million of accumulated depreciation, respectively, were included in Property, plant and equipment. Charges resulting from the depreciation of assets held under capital and financing leases are recognized within depreciation expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Non-cash issuances of capital and financing lease obligations totaling $1.3 million, $0.5 million, and $103.3 million, are excluded from cash flows from investing and financing activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

17. CONTINGENCIES
In fiscal 1991, we acquiredLitigation Matters
We are a party to certain litigation matters relating to our acquisition of Beatrice Company ("Beatrice"). As a result of the acquisition of Beatrice and the significant pre-acquisition contingencies of the Beatrice businesses and its former subsidiaries, our condensed consolidated post-

70

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

acquisition financial statements reflect liabilities associated with the estimated resolution of these contingencies. These include variousfiscal 1991, including litigation and environmental proceedings related to businesses divested by Beatrice prior to itsour acquisition by us. The litigation includesof the company. These proceedings include suits against a number of lead paint and pigment manufacturers, including ConAgra Grocery Products Company, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company ("ConAgra Grocery Products"), and the Company as alleged successorssuccessor to W. P. Fuller & Co., a lead paint and pigment manufacturer owned and operated by a predecessor to Beatrice from 1962 until 1967. These lawsuits generally seek damages for personal injury, property damage, economic loss, and governmental expenditures allegedly caused by the use of lead-based paint, and/or injunctive relief for inspection and abatement. Although decisions favorable to us have been rendered in Rhode Island, New Jersey, Wisconsin, and Ohio, we remain a defendant in active suits in Illinois and California. ConAgra Grocery Products has denied liability in both suits, both on the merits of the claims and on the basis that we do not believe it to be the successor to any liability attributable to W. P. Fuller & Co. The California suit is discussed in the following paragraph. The Illinois suit seeks class-wide relief for reimbursement of costs associated with the testing of lead levels in blood. We do not believe it is probable that we have incurred any liability with respect to the Illinois case, nor is it possible to estimate any potential exposure.
In California, a number of cities and counties joined in a consolidated action seeking abatement of thean alleged public nuisance.nuisance in the form of lead-based paint potentially present on the interior of residences, regardless of its condition. On September 23, 2013, a trial of the California case concluded in the Superior Court of California for the County of Santa Clara, and on January 27, 2014, the court entered Judgmenta judgment (the "Judgment") against ConAgra Grocery Products and two other defendants which ordersordering the creation of a California abatement fund in the amount of $1.15 billion. Liability is joint and several. The Company believes ConAgra Grocery Products did not inherit any liabilities of W. P. Fuller Co. The Company will continue to vigorously defend itself in this case and has appealed the Judgment, and on November 14, 2017 the California Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District reversed in part, holding that the defendants were not liable to pay for abatement of homes built after 1950, but affirmed the Judgment as to homes built before 1951. The Court of Appeal remanded the case to the trial court with directions to recalculate the amount of the Stateabatement fund estimated to be necessary to cover the cost of California Sixth Appellate District. The Company expects the appeal process will last several years. The absenceremediating pre-1951 homes, and to hold an evidentiary hearing regarding appointment of any linkage betweena suitable receiver. ConAgra Grocery Products and W. P. Fuller Co.the other defendants petitioned the California Supreme Court for review of the decision, which we believe to be an unprecedented expansion of current California law. On February 14, 2018, the California Supreme Court denied the petition and declined to review the merits of the case, and the case was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. ConAgra Grocery Products and the other defendants have indicated that they will seek further review of certain issues from the Supreme Court of the United States, although further appeal is discretionary and may not be granted. Further proceedings in the trial court may not be stayed pending the outcome of any further appeal. In light of the decision rendered by the California Appellate Court on November 14, 2017, and the California Supreme Court's decision on February 14, 2018 not to review the Appellate Court's decision, we

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

have concluded that the liability has likely become probable as contemplated by Accounting Standards Codification Topic 450, however many uncertainties remain which make it difficult to estimate the potential liability, including the following: (i) the trial court has not yet recalculated its estimate of the amount needed to remediate pre-1951 homes in the plaintiff jurisdictions or entered a new judgment to replace the one vacated by the California Appellate Court; (ii) although liability is joint and several, it is unknown what amount each defendant may ultimately be required to pay or how allocation among the defendants (and other potentially responsible parties such as property owners who may have violated the applicable housing codes) will be determined; (iii) according to the trial court's original order, participation in the abatement program by eligible homeowners is voluntary and it is unknown what percentage of eligible homeowners will choose to participate or how such claims will be administered; (iv) the trial court's original order required that any amounts paid by the defendants into the fund that were not spent within four years would be returned to the defendants, and it is unknown whether this feature of the fund will be retained or, if it is retained, how much will be spent during that time period; and (v) defendants will have a new right to appeal any new aspects of the judgment entered by the trial court upon remand, although it is unknown whether the court would stay execution of any new judgment while a subsequent appeal is pending.

To assist the trial court in satisfying its responsibilities, during our fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, the defendants and plaintiff each submitted information to the court regarding recalculation of the abatement fund. In addition, one of the defendants entered into a proposed settlement with the plaintiff, contingent upon a judicial good faith determination under California law. We are uncertain as to when the court will make a ruling on a recalculated abatement fund or the proposed settlement. Notwithstanding the uncertainties described above, this additional information was used by the Company in concluding that a loss is now reasonably estimable. While the ultimate amount of any loss and timing of payments related thereto remain uncertain and could change as further information is obtained, we believe that our share of the loss could range from $60 million to $335 million and have recorded a liability for the amount in that range that we believe is a critical issue among others thatbetter estimate than the Company will continue to advance throughoutlow or high ends of the appeals process. It is not possible to estimate exposure in this case or the remaining case in Illinois (which is based on different legal theories). If ultimately necessary, the Company will look to its insurance policies for coverage; its carriers are on notice. However, therange. The extent of insurance coverage is uncertain and the CompanyCompany's carriers are on notice; however, any possible insurance recovery has not been considered for purposes of determining our liability. We cannot absolutely assure that the final resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
The environmental proceedings associated with Beatrice include litigation and administrative proceedings involving Beatrice's status as a potentially responsible party at 37 Superfund, proposed Superfund, or state-equivalent sites. These sites involve locations previously owned or operated by predecessors of Beatrice that used or produced petroleum, pesticides, fertilizers, dyes, inks, solvents, PCBs, acids, lead, sulfur, tannery wastes, and/or other contaminants. Beatrice has paid or is in the process of paying its liability share at 33 of these sites. Reserves for these matters have been established based on our best estimate of the undiscounted remediation liabilities, which estimates include evaluation of investigatory studies, extent of required clean-up, the known volumetric contribution of Beatrice and other potentially responsible parties, and its experience in remediating sites. The accrual for Beatrice-related environmental matters totaled $53.7 million as of May 31, 2015, a majority of which relates to the Superfund and state-equivalent sites referenced above. We expect expenditures for Beatrice-related environmental matters to continue for up to 18 years.
In certain limited situations, we will guarantee an obligation of an unconsolidated entity. At the time in which we initially provide such a guarantee, we assess the risk of financial exposure to us under these agreements. We consider the credit-worthiness of the guaranteed party, the value of any collateral pledged against the related obligation, and any other factors that may mitigate our risk. We actively monitor market and entity-specific conditions that may result in a change of our assessment of the risk of loss under these agreements.
We guarantee certain leases resulting from the 2002 divestiture of our fresh beef and pork operations. The remaining terms of these arrangements are less than a year and the maximum amount of future payments we have guaranteed was $2.7 million as of May 31, 2015.
We are a party to various potato supply agreements. Under the terms of certain such potato supply agreements, we have guaranteed repayment of short-term bank loans of the potato suppliers, under certain conditions. At May 31, 2015, the amount of supplier loans we have effectively guaranteed was $39.3 million. We have not established a liability for these guarantees, as we have determined that the likelihood of our required performance under the guarantees is remote.
We were a party to a supply agreement with an onion processing company where we had guaranteed, under certain conditions, repayment of up to $25.0 million payable under a secured loan (the "Secured Loan") of this onion products supplier to the supplier's lender. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we received notice from the lender that the supplier had defaulted on the Secured Loan and we exercised our option to purchase the Secured Loan from the lender for $40.8 million, thereby assuming first-priority secured rights to the underlying collateral for the amount of the Secured Loan, and cancelling our guarantee. The supplier filed for bankruptcy during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 and during the second quarter of fiscal 2013, we acquired ownership and all rights to the underlying collateral, consisting of agricultural land and an onion processing facility. During the third quarter of fiscal 2013, we recognized an impairment charge of $10.2 million in our Commercial Foods segment to reduce the carrying amount of these assets to their estimated fair value based upon updated appraisals. During the second quarter of fiscal 2014, we recognized an additional impairment charge of $8.9 million in our Commercial

71

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Foods segment to reduce the carrying amount of the processing facility to its estimated fair value based upon expected sales proceeds. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we sold the land and recognized a gain of $5.1 million in our Commercial Foods segment. In the third quarter of fiscal 2015, we sold the processing facility and recognized an immaterial gain in our Commercial Foods segment.
Federal income tax credits were generated related to our sweet potato production facility in Delhi, Louisiana. Third parties invested in certain of these income tax credits. We have guaranteed these third parties the face value of these income tax credits over their statutory lives, through fiscal 2017, in the event that the income tax credits are recaptured or reduced. The face value of the income tax credits was $26.7 million as of May 31, 2015. We believe the likelihood of the recapture or reduction of the income tax credits is remote, and therefore we have not established a liability in connection with this guarantee.
We are a party to a number of lawsuits and claims arising out of our ongoing business operations. Among these, there are lawsuits, claims, and matters related to the February 2007 recall of our peanut butter products. Among the matters outstanding during fiscal 2015 related to the peanut butter recall was an investigation by the U.S. Attorney's office in Georgia and the Consumer Protection Branch of the Department of Justice into the 2007 recall. Just prior to the end of fiscal 2015, we negotiated a resolution of this matter, which resulted in an executed plea agreement pursuant to which ConAgra Grocery Products will plead guilty to a single misdemeanor violation of the Food, Drug & Cosmetics Act. If the plea is accepted by the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, the government’s investigation into the 2007 recall will conclude and ConAgra Grocery Products will make payments totaling $11.2 million to the federal government. Expenses related to this payment were accrued in previous periods. During fiscal 2013 and 2012, we recognized charges of $7.5 million and $17.5 million, respectively, in connection with this matter. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we reduced our accrual by $6.7 million. During the first quarter of fiscal 2015, we further reduced our accrual by $5.8 million and further reduced it by $1.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2015, based on ongoing discussions with the U.S. Attorney's office and the Department of Justice. The plea agreement is subject to Court approval, which will be sought along with the formal sentencing process in the coming months.
In June 2009, an accidental explosion occurred at our manufacturing facility in Garner, North Carolina. This facility was the primary production facility for our Slim Jim® branded meat snacks. In June 2009, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives announced its determination that the explosion was the result of an accidental natural gas release and not a deliberate act. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we settled our property and business interruption claims related to the Garner accident with our insurance providers. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. ("Jacobs"), our engineer and project manager at the site, filed a declaratory judgment action against us seeking indemnity for personal injury claims brought against it as a result of the accident. InDuring the first quarter of fiscal 2012, our motion for summary judgment was granted and the suit was dismissed without prejudice on the basis that the suit was filed prematurely. In the third quarter of fiscal 2014, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. refiled its action forseeking indemnity. On March 25, 2016, a Douglas County jury in Nebraska rendered a verdict in favor of Jacobs and against us in the amount of $108.9 million plus post-judgment interest. We filed our Notice of Appeal in September 2016, the appeal was heard by the Nebraska Supreme Court in November 2017, and the case is awaiting decision by the Nebraska Supreme Court. The appeal will continue to defend this action vigorously. Anybe decided directly by the Nebraska Supreme Court. Although our insurance carriers have provided customary notices of reservation of their rights under the policies of insurance, we expect any ultimate exposure in this case is expected to be limited to the applicable insurance deductible, althoughdeductible.
We are party to a number of putative class action lawsuits challenging various product claims made in the Company's product labeling. These matters include Briseno v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., in which it is alleged that the labeling for Wesson® oils as 100% natural is false and misleading because the oils contain genetically modified plants and organisms. In February 2015, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted class certification to permit plaintiffs to pursue state law claims. The Company appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which affirmed class certification in January 2017. The Supreme Court of the United States declined to review the decision and the case has been remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. While we cannot predict with certainty the results of this or any other legal proceeding, we do not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect on our insurance carriers have reserved their rightsfinancial condition, results of operations, or business.
We are party to matters challenging the Company's wage and hour practices. These matters include a number of putative class actions consolidated under the policiescaption Negrete v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., et al, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of insurance.California, in which the plaintiffs allege a pattern of violations of California and/or federal law at several current and former Company manufacturing facilities across the State of California. While we cannot predict with certainty

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

the results of this or any other legal proceeding, we do not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or business.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, we accrued $151.0 million in new legal reserves relating to the matters set forth above.
Environmental Matters
We holdare a fifty percent ownership interestparty to certain environmental proceedings relating to our acquisition of Beatrice in Lamb-Weston/Meijer, V.O.F. (“fiscal 1991. Such proceedings include proceedings related to businesses divested by Beatrice prior to our acquisition of Beatrice. The current environmental proceedings associated with Beatrice include litigation and administrative proceedings involving Beatrice's possible status as a potentially responsible party at approximately 40 Superfund, proposed Superfund, or state-equivalent sites (the "Beatrice sites"). These sites involve locations previously owned or operated by predecessors of Beatrice that used or produced petroleum, pesticides, fertilizers, dyes, inks, solvents, PCBs, acids, lead, sulfur, tannery wastes, and/or other contaminants. In the past five years, Beatrice has paid or is in the process of paying its liability share at 31 of these sites. Reserves for these Beatrice environmental proceedings have been established based on our best estimate of the undiscounted remediation liabilities, which estimates include evaluation of investigatory studies, extent of required clean-up, the known volumetric contribution of Beatrice and other potentially responsible parties, and its experience in remediating sites. The accrual for Beatrice-related environmental matters totaled $52.4 million as of May 27, 2018, a majority of which relates to the Superfund and state-equivalent sites referenced above. During the third quarter of fiscal 2017, a final Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study was submitted for the Southwest Properties portion of the Wells G&H Superfund site, which is one of the Beatrice sites. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA") issued a Record of Decision (the "ROD") for the Southwest Properties portion of the site on September 29, 2017, and has entered into negotiations with potentially responsible parties to determine final responsibility for implementing the ROD.
Guarantees and Other Contingencies
In certain limited situations, we guarantee obligations of the Lamb Weston Meijer”business pursuant to guarantee arrangements that existed prior to the Spinoff and remained in place following completion of the Spinoff until such guarantee obligations are substituted for guarantees issued by Lamb Weston. Such guarantee arrangements are described below. Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016 (the "Separation Agreement"), a Netherlands joint venture, headquartered in the Netherlands, that manufacturesbetween us and sells frozen potato products principally in Europe. We and our partnerLamb Weston, these guarantee arrangements are jointly and severally liable for all legaldeemed liabilities of Lamb Weston Meijer.that were transferred to Lamb Weston as part of the Spinoff. Accordingly, in the event that we are required to make any payments as a result of these guarantee arrangements, Lamb Weston is obligated to indemnify us for any such liability, reduced by any insurance proceeds received by us, in accordance with the terms of the indemnification provisions under the Separation Agreement.
Lamb Weston is a party to a warehouse services agreement with a third-party warehouse provider through July 2035. Under this agreement, Lamb Weston is required to make payments for warehouse services based on the quantity of goods stored and other service factors. We have guaranteed the warehouse provider that we will make the payments required under the agreement in the event that Lamb Weston fails to perform. Minimum payments of $1.5 million per month are required under this agreement. It is not possible to determine the maximum amount of the payment obligations under this agreement. Upon completion of the Spinoff, we recognized a liability for the estimated fair value of this guarantee. As of May 31, 2015 and May 25, 2014,27, 2018, the totalamount of this guarantee, recorded in other noncurrent liabilities, of was $28.1 million.
Lamb Weston Meijer were $129.1 million and $144.7 million, respectively.is a party to an agricultural sublease agreement with a third party for certain farmland through 2020 (subject, at Lamb Weston's option, to extension for two additional five-year periods). Under the terms of the sublease agreement, Lamb Weston Meijer is well capitalized, with partners’ equity of $255.9 million and $247.0 million as of May 31, 2015 and May 25, 2014, respectively.required to make certain rental payments to the sublessor. We have not established a liability on our balance sheets forguaranteed the obligationssublessor Lamb Weston's performance and the payment of all amounts (including indemnification obligations) owed by Lamb Weston Meijer, asunder the sublease agreement, up to a maximum of $75.0 million. We believe the farmland associated with this sublease agreement is readily marketable for lease to other area farming operators. As such, we believe that any financial exposure to the company, in the event that we were required to perform under the guaranty, would be largely mitigated.
We lease or leased certain office buildings from entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities. The lease agreements with these entities include fixed-price purchase options for the likelihood of any required payment byassets being leased. The lease agreements also contain contingent put options (the "lease put options") that allow or allowed the lessors to require us to settle suchpurchase the buildings at the greater of original construction cost, or fair market value, without a lease agreement in place (the "put price") in certain limited circumstances. As a result of substantial impairment charges related to our divested Private Brands operations, these lease put options became exercisable. During fiscal 2016, we entered into a series of related transactions in which we exchanged

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

a warehouse we owned in Indiana for two buildings and parcels of land that we leased as part of our Omaha corporate offices. Concurrent with the asset exchange, the leases on the two Omaha corporate buildings subject to contingent put options were canceled. We recognized aggregate charges of $55.6 million for the early termination of these leases. We also entered into a lease for the warehouse in Indiana and we recorded a financing lease obligation of $74.2 million. During fiscal 2017, one of these lease agreements expired. As a result of this expiration, we reversed the applicable accrual and recognized a benefit of $6.7 million in SG&A expenses. During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we purchased two buildings that were subject to lease put options and recognized net losses totaling $48.2 million for the early exit of unfavorable lease contracts. As of May 27, 2018, there was one remaining leased building subject to a lease put option for which the put option price exceeded the estimated fair value of the property by $8.2 million, of which we had accrued $1.2 million. We are amortizing the difference between the put price and the estimated fair value (without a lease agreement in place) of the property over the remaining lease term within SG&A expenses. This lease is accounted for as an operating lease, and accordingly, there are no material assets and liabilities, other than the accrued portion of Lamb Weston Meijer is remote.the put price, associated with this entity included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of this entity. In making this determination, we have considered, among other items, the terms of the lease agreement, the expected remaining useful life of the asset leased, and the capital structure of the lessor entity.
General
After taking into account liabilities recognized for all of the foregoing matters, management believes the ultimate resolution of such matters should not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. Itliquidity; however, it is reasonably possible that a change in one of the estimates of any of the foregoing matters may occur in the future and, as noted, while unlikely, the lead paint matter could result in a material final judgment. judgment which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
Costs of legal services associated with the foregoing matters are recognized in earnings as services are provided.


72

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

18. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Our operations are exposed to market risks from adverse changes in commodity prices affecting the cost of raw materials and energy, foreign currency exchange rates, and interest rates. In the normal course of business, these risks are managed through a variety of strategies, including the use of derivatives.
Commodity and commodity index futures and option contracts are used from time to time to economically hedge commodity input prices on items such as natural gas, vegetable oils, proteins, packaging materials, dairy, grains, and electricity. Generally, we economically hedge a portion of our anticipated consumption of commodity inputs for periods of up to 36 months. We may enter into longer-term economic hedges on particular commodities, if deemed appropriate. As of May 31, 201527, 2018, we had economically hedged certain portions of our anticipated consumption of commodity inputs using derivative instruments with expiration dates through September 2016.March 2019.
In order to reduce exposures related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, we enter into forward exchange, option, or swap contracts from time to time for transactions denominated in a currency other than the applicable functional currency. This includes, but is not limited to, hedging against foreign currency risk in purchasing inventory and capital equipment, sales of finished goods, and future settlement of foreign-denominated assets and liabilities. As of May 31, 201527, 2018, we had economically hedged certain portions of our foreign currency risk in anticipated transactions using derivative instruments with expiration dates through May 2017.February 2019.
From time to time, we may use derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps, to reduce risk related to changes in interest rates. This includes, but is not limited to, hedging against increasing interest rates prior to the issuance of long-term debt and hedging the fair value of our senior long-term debt.
Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges

During 2011, we entered into interest rate swap contracts to hedge the interest rate risk related to our forecasted issuance of long-term debt in April 2014 (based on the anticipated refinancing of the senior long-term debt maturing at that time). We designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of the forecasted interest payments related to this anticipated debt issuance and recorded the unrealized loss in accumulated other comprehensive loss. In the third quarter of fiscal 2014, we determined that we would not issue long-term debt to refinance the debt maturing in April 2014. Accordingly, we recognized a charge to earnings, within selling, general and administrative expenses, of $54.9 million in fiscal 2014.
During fiscal 2013, we entered into interest rate swap contracts to hedge a portion of the interest rate risk related to our issuance of long-term debt to partially finance the acquisition of Ralcorp. We settled these contracts during the third quarter of fiscal 2013 resulting in a deferred gain of $4.2 million on senior notes maturing in 2043 and a deferred loss of $2.0 million on senior notes maturing in 2023, both recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss. These amounts are being amortized as a component of net interest expense over the lives of the related debt instruments. The unamortized amounts of the deferred gain and deferred loss at May 31, 2015 were $3.0 million and $1.3 million, respectively.
Derivatives Designated as Fair Value Hedges
During fiscal 2010, we entered into interest rate swap contracts to hedge the fair value of certain of our senior long-term debt instruments maturing in fiscal 2012 and 2014. We designated these interest rate swap contracts as fair value hedges of the debt instruments. During fiscal 2011, we terminated these interest rate swap contracts and received proceeds of $31.5 million. The cumulative adjustment to the fair value of the debt instruments being hedged was included in long-term debt and was amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining lives of the debt instruments through fiscal 2014.
During fiscal 2014, we entered into interest rate swap contracts to hedge the fair value of certain of our senior long-term debt instruments maturing in fiscal 2019 and 2020. These contracts, with a total notional amount of $500 million, effectively converted interest on this debt from fixed rate to floating rate. We designated these interest rate swap contracts as fair value hedges of the debt instruments. During the third quarter of fiscal 2015, we terminated the interest rate swap contracts and received proceeds of $21.9 million. The proceeds include $3.9 million of accrued interest from the interest rate swap contract, gains of $5.4 million representing the change in fair value of the interest rate swap contracts (the ineffective portion of the hedge) recognized within selling, general and administrative expenses and $12.6 million of cumulative adjustment to the fair value of the debt instruments that were hedged (the effective portion of the hedge), that will be amortized as a reduction to

73

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015,27, 2018, May 25, 2014,28, 2017, and May 26, 201329, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

interest expense over the remaining life of the debt instruments through fiscal 2020. The unamortized amount of the deferred gain was $11.8 million at May 31, 2015.
Changes in fair value of such derivative instruments were immediately recognized in earnings along with changes in the fair value of the items being hedged (based solely on the change in the benchmark interest rate). In fiscal 2015 and 2014, we recognized gains of $8.9 million and $9.1 million, respectively, representing the fair value of the interest rate swap contracts and losses of $5.8 million and $6.8 million, respectively, representing the change in fair value of the related senior long-term debt. The net gains of $3.1 million and $2.3 million for fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively, are classified within selling, general and administrative expenses.
The entire change in fair value of the derivative instruments was included in our assessment of hedge effectiveness.
Economic Hedges of Forecasted Cash Flows
Many of our derivatives do not qualify for, and we do not currently designate certain commodity or foreign currency derivatives to achieve, hedge accounting treatment. We reflect realized and unrealized gains and losses from derivatives used to economically hedge anticipated commodity consumption and to mitigate foreign currency cash flow risk in earnings immediately within general corporate expense (within cost of goods sold). The gains and losses are reclassified to segment operating results in the period in which the underlying item being economically hedged is recognized in cost of goods sold. In the event that management determines a particular derivative entered into as an economic hedge of a forecasted commodity purchase has ceased to function as an economic hedge, we cease recognizing further gains and losses on such derivatives in corporate expense and begin recognizing such gains and losses within segment operating results immediately.
Economic Hedges of Fair Values — Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We may use options and cross currency swaps to economically hedge the fair value of certain monetary assets and liabilities (including intercompany balances) denominated in a currency other than the functional currency. These derivatives are marked-to-market with gains and losses immediately recognized in selling, general and administrativeSG&A expenses. These substantially offset the foreign currency transaction gains or losses recognized as values of the monetary assets or liabilities being economically hedged change.hedged.
All derivative instruments are recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value (refer to Note 20 for additional information related to fair value measurements). The fair value of derivative assets is recognized within prepaid expenses and other current assets, while the fair value of derivative liabilities is recognized within other accrued liabilities. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, we offset certain derivative asset and liability balances, as well as certain amounts representing rights to reclaim cash collateral and obligations to return cash collateral, where master netting agreements provide for legal right of setoff. At May 31, 201527, 2018, $5.9 and May 28, 2017, $1.0 million, representing an obligation to return cash collateral, and $0.9 million, representing a right to reclaim cash collateral, wasrespectively, were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and at May 25, 2014, $6.2 million, representing an obligation to return cash collateral, was included in other accrued liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Derivative assets and liabilities and amounts representing a right to reclaim cash collateral or obligation to return cash collateral were reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:
May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
Prepaid expenses and other current assets$32.2
 $38.8
$4.4
 $2.3
Other accrued liabilities14.2
 10.4
0.1
 1.3

74

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The following table presents our derivative assets and liabilities at May 31, 201527, 2018, on a gross basis, prior to the setoff of $7.3$1.4 million to total derivative assets and $13.2$0.4 million to total derivative liabilities where legal right of setoff existed:
Derivative Assets Derivative LiabilitiesDerivative Assets Derivative Liabilities
Balance Sheet
Location
 Fair Value 
Balance Sheet
Location
 Fair Value
Balance Sheet
Location
 Fair Value 
Balance Sheet
Location
 Fair Value
Commodity contractsPrepaid expenses and other current assets $20.8
 Other accrued liabilities $26.9
Prepaid expenses and other current assets $3.7
 Other accrued liabilities $0.4
Foreign exchange contractsPrepaid expenses and other current assets 17.7
 Other accrued liabilities 0.4
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 2.1
 Other accrued liabilities 
OtherPrepaid expenses and other current assets 1.0
 Other accrued liabilities 0.1
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 
 Other accrued liabilities 0.1
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments $39.5
 $27.4
 $5.8
 $0.5
Total derivatives $39.5
 $27.4

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The following table presents our derivative assets and liabilities, at May 25, 201428, 2017, on a gross basis, prior to the setoff of $13.0$0.5 million to total derivative assets and $6.8$1.4 million to total derivative liabilities where legal right of setoff existed:
Derivative Assets Derivative LiabilitiesDerivative Assets Derivative Liabilities
Balance Sheet
Location
 Fair Value 
Balance Sheet
Location
 Fair Value
Balance Sheet
Location
 Fair Value 
Balance Sheet
Location
 Fair Value
Interest rate contractsPrepaid expenses and other current assets $9.1
 Other accrued liabilities $
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments $9.1
 $
Commodity contractsPrepaid expenses and other current assets $28.6
 Other accrued liabilities $13.9
Prepaid expenses and other current assets $2.6
 Other accrued liabilities $1.4
Foreign exchange contractsPrepaid expenses and other current assets 13.4
 Other accrued liabilities 3.3
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 0.2
 Other accrued liabilities 1.1
OtherPrepaid expenses and other current assets 0.7
 Other accrued liabilities 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 
 Other accrued liabilities 0.2
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments $42.7
 $17.2
 $2.8
 $2.7
Total derivatives $51.8
 $17.2
The location and amount of gains (losses) from derivatives not designated as hedging instruments in our Consolidated Statements of EarningsOperations were as follows:
 For the Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 2015 For the Fiscal Year Ended May 27, 2018
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments 
Location in Consolidated Statement of Operations of
Gain (Loss) Recognized  on Derivatives
 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized on Derivatives
in Consolidated
Statement of Operations
 
Location in Consolidated Statement of Operations of
Gain (Loss) Recognized on Derivatives
 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized on Derivatives
in Consolidated
Statement of Operations
Commodity contracts Cost of goods sold $(109.8) Cost of goods sold $3.0
Foreign exchange contracts Cost of goods sold 1.3
 Cost of goods sold (3.9)
Foreign exchange contracts Selling, general and administrative expense 10.6
 Selling, general and administrative expense 0.3
Interest rate contracts Selling, general and administrative expense (1.4)
Total gain from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments $(99.3)
Total loss from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments $(0.6)

75

  For the Fiscal Year Ended May 28, 2017
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments 
Location in Consolidated Statement of Operations of
Gain (Loss) Recognized on Derivatives
 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized on Derivatives
in Consolidated
Statement of Operations
Commodity contracts Cost of goods sold $0.9
Foreign exchange contracts Cost of goods sold (0.3)
Foreign exchange contracts Selling, general and administrative expense 0.2
Total gain from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments   $0.8

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015,27, 2018, May 25, 2014,28, 2017, and May 26, 201329, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

  For the Fiscal Year Ended May 25, 2014
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments 
Location in Consolidated Statement of Operations of
Gain (Loss) Recognized on Derivatives
 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized on Derivatives
in Consolidated
Statement of Operations
Commodity contracts Cost of goods sold $24.9
Foreign exchange contracts Cost of goods sold 1.9
Foreign exchange contracts Selling, general and administrative expense 5.0
Interest rate contracts Selling, general and administrative expense (54.9)
Total gain from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments   $(23.1)
 For the Fiscal Year Ended May 26, 2013 
For the Fiscal Year Ended May 29, 2016

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments 
Location in Consolidated Statement of Operations of
Gain (Loss) Recognized on Derivatives
 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized on Derivatives
in Consolidated
Statement of Operations
 
Location in Consolidated Statement of Operations of
Gain (Loss) Recognized on Derivatives
 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized on Derivatives
in Consolidated
Statement of Operations
Commodity contracts Cost of goods sold $57.6
 Cost of goods sold $(8.1)
Foreign exchange contracts Cost of goods sold 20.3
 Cost of goods sold 0.7
Commodity contracts Selling, general and administrative expense 0.1
Foreign exchange contracts Selling, general and administrative expense 0.1
 Selling, general and administrative expense 2.9
Total gain from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments $78.1
Total loss from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments $(4.5)
As of May 31, 201527, 2018, our open commodity contracts had a notional value (defined as notional quantity times market value per notional quantity unit) of $554.9$100.0 million and $393.1$34.2 million for purchase and sales contracts, respectively. As of May 25, 201428, 2017, our open commodity contracts had a notional value of $1.4 billion76.8 million and $73.4 million for both purchase and sales contracts.contracts, respectively. The notional amount of our foreign currency forward and cross currency swap contracts as of May 31, 201527, 2018 and May 25, 201428, 2017 was $108.6$82.4 million and $170.181.9 million, respectively.
We enter into certain commodity, interest rate, and foreign exchange derivatives with a diversified group of counterparties. We continually monitor our positions and the credit ratings of the counterparties involved and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party. These transactions may expose us to potential losses due to the risk of nonperformance by these counterparties. We have not incurred a material loss due to nonperformance in any period presented and do not expect to incur any such material loss. We also enter into futures and options transactions through various regulated exchanges.
At May 31, 201527, 2018, the maximum amount of loss due to the credit risk of the counterparties, had the counterparties failed to perform according to the terms of the contracts, was $18.6$2.7 million.

19. PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
We have defined benefit retirement plans ("plans") for eligible salaried and hourly employees. Benefits are based on years of credited service and average compensation or stated amounts for each year of service. We also sponsor postretirement plans which provide certain medical and dental benefits ("other postretirement benefits") to qualifying U.S. employees. Effective August 1, 2013, our defined benefit pension plan for eligible salaried employees was closed to new hire salaried employees. New hire salaried employees will generally be eligible to participate in our defined contribution plan.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2018, we approved the amendment of our salaried and non-qualified pension plans effective as of December 31, 2017. The amendment froze the compensation and service periods used to calculate pension benefits for active employees who participate in the plans. Beginning January 1, 2018, impacted employees do not accrue additional benefit for future service and eligible compensation received under these plans.
As a result of the amendment, we remeasured our pension plan liability as of September 30, 2017. In connection with the remeasurement, we updated the effective discount rate assumption from 3.90% to 3.78%. The curtailment and related remeasurement resulted in a net decrease to the underfunded status of the pension plans by $43.5 million with a corresponding benefit within other comprehensive income (loss) for the second quarter of fiscal 2018. In addition, we recorded charges of $3.4 million and $0.7 million reflecting the write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of our pension liability and a curtailment charge, respectively.
We recognize the funded status of our plans and other benefits in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For our plans, we also recognize as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, the net of tax results of the actuarial gains or losses within the corridor and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized in net periodic benefit cost. For our other benefits, we also recognize as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), the net of tax results of the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized in net periodic

76

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

benefit cost. These amounts will be adjusted out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as they are subsequently recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost. For our pension plans, we have elected to immediately recognize

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

actuarial gains and losses in our operating results in the year in which they occur, to the extent they exceed the corridor, eliminating amortization. Amounts are included in the components of pension benefit and other postretirement benefit costs, below, as recognized net actuarial loss.
The information below includes the activities of our continuing and discontinued operations.
The changes in benefit obligations and plan assets at May 31, 201527, 2018 and May 25, 201428, 2017 are presented in the following table.
Pension Benefits Other BenefitsPension Benefits Other Benefits
2015 2014 2015 20142018 2017 2018 2017
Change in Benefit Obligation              
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$3,979.0
 $3,817.5
 $283.5
 $302.8
$3,548.7
 $3,903.0
 $156.9
 $201.7
Service cost88.5
 89.0
 0.6
 0.7
42.8
 56.9
 0.2
 0.3
Interest cost161.3
 151.1
 9.9
 9.7
111.1
 116.8
 3.9
 4.6
Plan participants’ contributions
 
 5.9
 6.1
Plan participants' contributions
 
 4.7
 4.7
Amendments0.7
 2.2
 (3.3) (5.7)0.6
 5.5
 (17.2) 
Actuarial loss (gain)35.7
 79.5
 (35.9) (4.6)
Actuarial gain(9.4) (51.5) (13.2) (32.0)
Plan settlements(10.2) (287.5) 
 
Special termination benefits6.9
 0.4
 
 

 1.5
 
 
Curtailments(79.5) (18.1) 
 
Benefits paid(176.7) (159.5) (24.3) (25.1)(181.3) (169.7) (16.2) (19.0)
Currency(3.2) (1.2) (1.0) (0.4)0.8
 (0.8) 0.2
 (0.2)
Business divestitures
 (7.4) 
 (3.2)
Benefit obligation at end of year$4,092.2
 $3,979.0
 $235.4
 $283.5
$3,423.6
 $3,548.7
 $119.3
 $156.9
Change in Plan Assets              
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year$3,546.0
 $3,343.3
 $0.3
 $0.1
$2,983.6
 $2,959.4
 $
 $0.1
Actual return on plan assets178.6
 358.8
 (0.3) 0.2
276.1
 346.1
 3.7
 
Employer contributions13.5
 18.3
 18.5
 19.0
312.6
 163.0
 11.5
 14.2
Plan participants’ contributions
 
 5.9
 6.1
Plan participants' contributions
 
 4.7
 4.7
Plan settlements(10.2) (287.5) 
 
Investment and administrative expenses(18.8) (13.8) 
 
(26.5) (26.7) 
 
Benefits paid(176.7) (159.5) (24.3) (25.1)(181.3) (169.7) (16.2) (19.0)
Currency(3.6) (1.1) 
 
0.8
 (1.0) 
 
Fair value of plan assets at end of year$3,539.0
 $3,546.0
 $0.1
 $0.3
$3,355.1
 $2,983.6
 $3.7
 $

77

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015,27, 2018, May 25, 2014,28, 2017, and May 26, 201329, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The funded status and amounts recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at May 31, 201527, 2018 and May 25, 201428, 2017 were:
 Pension Benefits Other Benefits Pension Benefits Other Benefits
 2015 2014 2015 2014 2018 2017 2018 2017
Funded Status $(553.2) $(433.0) $(235.3) $(283.2) $(68.5) $(565.1) $(115.6) $(156.9)
Amounts Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets                
Other assets $20.5
 $18.8
 $
 $
 $103.0
 $17.1
 $2.6
 $
Other accrued liabilities (10.7) (10.0) (23.3) (25.0) (11.8) (10.9) (16.2) (18.4)
Other noncurrent liabilities (563.0) (441.8) (212.0) (258.2) (159.7) (571.3) (102.0) (138.5)
Net Amount Recognized $(553.2) $(433.0) $(235.3) $(283.2) $(68.5) $(565.1) $(115.6) $(156.9)
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss (Pre-tax)                
Actuarial net loss $339.6
 $202.8
 $16.1
 $55.3
Actuarial net loss (gain) $48.8
 $174.2
 $(25.8) $(9.0)
Net prior service cost (benefit) 14.2
 18.7
 (25.0) (29.6) 13.8
 16.0
 (18.4) (4.6)
Total $353.8
 $221.5
 $(8.9) $25.7
 $62.6
 $190.2
 $(44.2) $(13.6)
Weighted-Average Actuarial Assumptions Used to Determine Benefit Obligations at May 31, 2015 and May 25, 2014        
Weighted-Average Actuarial Assumptions Used to Determine Benefit Obligations at May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017        
Discount rate 4.10% 4.15% 3.50% 3.65% 4.14% 3.90% 3.81% 3.33%
Long-term rate of compensation increase 3.70% 4.25% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 3.63% N/A
 N/A
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $3.9$3.4 billion and $3.5 billion at May 31, 201527, 2018 and May 25, 2014.28, 2017, respectively.
The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation, and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets at May 31, 201527, 2018 and May 25, 201428, 2017 were:
 2015 2014 2018 2017
Projected benefit obligation $3,805.8
 $3,390.9
 $951.1
 $3,433.6
Accumulated benefit obligation 3,658.3
 3,289.3
 950.1
 3,357.1
Fair value of plan assets 3,232.1
 2,942.5
 779.5
 2,851.4
Components of pension benefit and other postretirement benefit costs included:
Pension Benefits Other BenefitsPension Benefits Other Benefits
2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
Service cost$88.5
 $89.0
 $81.8
 $0.6
 $0.7
 $0.6
$42.8
 $56.9
 $93.8
 $0.2
 $0.3
 $0.4
Interest cost161.3
 151.1
 150.1
 9.9
 9.7
 10.5
111.1
 116.8
 159.8
 3.9
 4.6
 7.5
Expected return on plan assets(267.9) (252.9) (216.4) 
 
 
(218.3) (207.4) (259.9) 
 
 
Amortization of prior service cost (benefit)3.7
 3.8
 3.6
 (7.9) (7.2) (8.2)2.9
 2.6
 2.7
 (3.4) (6.6) (7.8)
Special termination benefits6.9
 0.4
 
 
 
 

 1.5
 25.6
 
 
 
Recognized net actuarial loss6.9
 2.7
 3.6
 3.5
 6.7
 5.9
3.4
 1.2
 348.5
 
 0.5
 0.1
Settlement loss1.3
 13.8
 
 
 
 
Curtailment loss1.5
 
 0.8
 
 
 
0.7
 1.7
 0.3
 
 
 
Benefit cost — Company plans0.9
 (5.9) 23.5
 6.1
 9.9
 8.8
(56.1) (12.9) 370.8
 0.7
 (1.2) 0.2
Pension benefit cost — multi-employer plans12.4
 12.6
 23.6
 
 
 
7.1
 12.0
 42.9
 
 
 
Total benefit cost$13.3
 $6.7
 $47.1
 $6.1
 $9.9
 $8.8
Total benefit (income) cost$(49.0) $(0.9) $413.7
 $0.7
 $(1.2) $0.2

78

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015,27, 2018, May 25, 2014,28, 2017, and May 26, 201329, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

As a result of the Spinoff, during fiscal 2017, we recorded a pension curtailment gain of $19.5 million within other comprehensive income (loss) and remeasured a significant qualified pension plan as of November 9, 2016. In connection with the remeasurement, we updated the effective discount rate assumption from 3.86% to 4.04%. The remeasurement and the curtailment gain decreased the underfunded status of the pension plans by $66.0 million with a corresponding benefit within other comprehensive income (loss).
During fiscal 2017, we provided a voluntary lump-sum settlement offer to certain terminated vested participants in our salaried pension plan. Lump-sum settlement payments totaling $287.5 million were distributed from pension plan assets to such participants. Due to the pension settlement, we were required to remeasure our pension plan liability. In connection with the remeasurement, we updated the effective discount rate assumption to 4.11%, as of December 31, 2016. The settlement and related remeasurement resulted in the recognition of a settlement charge of 13.8 million, reflected in SG&A expenses, as well as a benefit to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) totaling $62.2 million.
Special termination benefits granted in connection with the formation of Ardent Millsvoluntary retirement program resulted in the recognition of $6.9$25.6 million of expense during fiscal 2015.2016. This expense was included in resultsrestructuring activities.
In fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, the Company recorded charges of $3.4 million, $1.2 million, and $348.5 million, respectively, reflecting the year-end write-off of actuarial losses in excess of 10% of our pension liability.
The Company recorded an expense of $0.6 million (primarily within restructuring activities), $4.0 million ($2.1 million was recorded in discontinued operations.operations and $1.9 million was recorded in restructuring activities), and $31.8 million ($2.0 million was recorded in discontinued operations and $29.8 million was recorded in restructuring activities) during fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, related to our expected incurrence of certain multi-employer plan withdrawal costs.
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) were:
 Pension Benefits Other Benefits Pension Benefits Other Benefits
 2015 2014 2015 2014 2018 2017 2018 2017
Net actuarial gain (loss) $(143.8) $12.7
 $35.8
 $4.9
Net actuarial gain $120.0
 $183.1
 $16.8
 $32.4
Amendments (0.6) (2.2) 3.3
 5.7
 (0.6) (5.5) 17.2
 (0.4)
Amortization of prior service cost (benefit) 5.2
 3.8
 (7.9) (7.2) 2.9
 2.9
 (3.4) (6.6)
Settlement and curtailment loss 2.0
 13.8
 
 
Recognized net actuarial loss 6.9
 2.7
 3.5
 6.7
 3.4
 1.2
 
 0.5
Net amount recognized $(132.3) $17.0
 $34.7
 $10.1
 $127.7
 $195.5
 $30.6
 $25.9
Weighted-Average Actuarial Assumptions Used to Determine Net Expense
 Pension Benefits Other Benefits Pension Benefits Other Benefits
 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013 2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
Discount rate 4.15% 4.05% 4.50% 3.65% 3.35% 3.90% 3.90% 3.83% 4.10% 3.33% 3.18% 3.50%
Long-term rate of return on plan assets 7.75% 7.75% 7.75% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 7.50% 7.50% 7.75% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Long-term rate of compensation increase 4.25% 4.25% 4.25% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 3.63% 3.66% 3.70% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Beginning in fiscal 2017, the Company has elected to use a split discount rate (spot-rate approach) for the U.S. plans and certain foreign plans. Historically, a single weighted-average discount rate was used in the calculation of service and interest costs, both of which are components of pension benefit costs. The spot-rate approach applies separate discount rates for each projected benefit payment in the calculation of pension service and interest cost. This change is considered a change in accounting estimate and has been applied prospectively. The pre-tax reduction in total pension benefit cost associated with this change in fiscal 2017 was approximately $27.0 million.
We amortize prior service cost for our pension plans and postretirement plans, as well as amortizable gains and losses for our postretirement plans, in equal annual amounts over the average expected future period of vested service. For plans with no active participants, average life expectancy is used instead of average expected useful service.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) expected to be recognized as components of net expense during the next year are as follows:
 Pension Benefits Other Benefits Pension Benefits Other Benefits
Prior service cost (benefit) $2.7
 $(8.1) $2.9
 $(2.2)
Net actuarial loss NA
 NA
Net actuarial gain N/A
 (1.5)

79

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Plan Assets
The fair value of plan assets, summarized by level within the fair value hierarchy described in Note 20, as of May 31, 2015, were27, 2018, was as follows:
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Cash and cash equivalents $2.4
 $80.3
 $
 $82.7
 $1.0
 $65.0
 $
 $66.0
Equity securities:                
U.S. equity securities 542.2
 90.9
 
 633.1
 319.8
 124.0
 
 443.8
International equity securities 362.9
 448.8
 
 811.7
 256.5
 1.0
 
 257.5
Fixed income securities:                
Government bonds 43.9
 290.5
 
 334.4
 
 1,854.8
 
 1,854.8
Corporate bonds 49.6
 394.9
 
 444.5
 
 4.7
 
 4.7
Mortgage-backed bonds 49.5
 24.0
 
 73.5
 
 9.3
 
 9.3
Real estate funds 
 6.6
 344.9
 351.5
 7.7
 
 
 7.7
Multi-strategy hedge funds 
 
 484.5
 484.5
Private equity funds 
 
 93.0
 93.0
Master limited partnerships 191.4
 
 
 191.4
 0.4
 
 
 0.4
Private natural resources funds 
 11.9
 19.9
 31.8
Net receivables for unsettled transactions 6.9
 
 
 6.9
Total assets $1,248.8
 $1,347.9
 $942.3
 $3,539.0
Net payables for unsettled transactions 10.9
 
 
 10.9
Fair value measurement of pension plan assets in the fair value hierarchy $596.3
 $2,058.8
 $
 $2,655.1
Investments measured at net asset value       700.0
Total pension plan assets 

 

 

 $3,355.1

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The fair value of plan assets, summarized by level within the fair value hierarchy described in Note 20, as of May 25, 2014, were28, 2017, was as follows:
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Cash and cash equivalents $2.4
 $150.2
 $
 $152.6
 $1.0
 $94.0
 $
 $95.0
Equity securities:                
U.S. equity securities 535.4
 93.2
 
 628.6
 494.0
 13.7
 
 507.7
International equity securities 589.7
 232.3
 
 822.0
 249.9
 13.2
 
 263.1
Fixed income securities:                
Government bonds 114.0
 266.3
 
 380.3
 51.1
 224.3
 
 275.4
Corporate bonds 63.8
 344.6
 
 408.4
 4.4
 279.5
 
 283.9
Mortgage-backed bonds 50.2
 77.7
 
 127.9
 63.3
 6.2
 
 69.5
Real estate funds 2.8
 24.0
 170.6
 197.4
 9.5
 
 
 9.5
Multi-strategy hedge funds 
 
 462.3
 462.3
Private equity funds 
 
 81.3
 81.3
Master limited partnerships 263.3
 
 
 263.3
 173.5
 
 
 173.5
Private natural resources funds 
 
 16.6
 16.6
Net receivables for unsettled transactions 5.3
 
 
 5.3
 0.7
 
 
 0.7
Total assets $1,626.9
 $1,188.3
 $730.8
 $3,546.0
Fair value measurement of pension plan assets in the fair value hierarchy $1,047.4
 $630.9
 $
 $1,678.3
Investments measured at net asset value       1,305.3
Total pension plan assets       $2,983.6
Level 1 assets are valued based on quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. The majority of the Level 1 assets listed above include the common stock of both U.S. and international companies, mutual funds, master limited partnership units, and real estate investment trusts, all of which are actively traded and priced in the market.
Level 2 assets are valued based on other significant observable inputs including quoted prices for similar securities, yield curves, indices, etc. The Level 2 assets listed above consist primarily of commingled equity investments where values are based on the net asset value of the underlying investments held, individual fixed income securities where values are based on quoted prices of

80

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

similar securities and observable market data, and commingled fixed income investments where values are based on the net asset value of the underlying investments held. data.
Level 3 assets are those where the fair value is determined based on unobservable inputs. The Level 3 assets listed above consist of alternative investments where active market pricing is not readily available and, as such, we use net asset values as an estimate of fair value as ais estimated using significant unobservable inputs.
Certain assets that are measured at fair value using the NAV (net asset value) per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient. For real estate funds,expedient have not been classified in the fair value is based on the net asset value provided by the investment manager who uses market data and independent third party appraisals to determine fair market value. For the multi-strategy hedge funds, the value is based on the net asset values provided by a third party administrator. For private equity and private energy funds, the investment manager provides the valuation using, among other things, comparable transactions, comparable public company data, discounted cash flow analysis, and market conditions.
Level 3hierarchy. Such investments are generally considered long-term in nature with varying redemption availability. CertainFor certain of our Level 3these investments, with a fair value of approximately $832.7$487.2 million as of May 31, 2015,27, 2018, the asset managers have the ability to impose customary redemption gates which may further restrict or limit the redemption of invested funds therein. As of May 31, 2015, Level 3 investments27, 2018, funds with a fair value of $1.5$0.1 million have imposed such gates.
As of May 31, 2015,27, 2018, we have unfunded commitments for additional investments of $96.1$65.4 million in private equity funds $47.6and $26.7 million in natural resources funds, and $29.1 million in real estate funds. We expect unfunded commitments to be funded from plan assets rather than the general assets of the Company.
To develop the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption for the pension plans, we consider the current asset allocation strategy, the historical investment performance, and the expectations for future returns of each asset class.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Our pension plan weighted-average asset allocations and our target asset allocations by asset category were as follows:
 May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014 
Target
Allocation
 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
Equity securities 41% 41% 25% - 45% 21% 39%
Debt securities 24% 26% 14% - 24% 58% 25%
Real estate funds 10% 6% 1% - 19% 10% 11%
Multi-strategy hedge funds 14% 13% 5% - 25% 4% 11%
Private equity��2% 2% 3% - 13% 4% 4%
Other 9% 12% 3% - 30% 3% 10%
Total 100% 100% 
 100% 100%
The Company’sDue to the salaried pension plan freeze, the Company's pension asset strategy is now designed to align our pension plan assets with our projected benefit obligation to reduce volatility by targeting an investment strategy reflects the expectation thatof approximately 90% in fixed-income securities and approximately 10% in return seeking assets, primarily equity securities, real estate, and multi-strategy hedge funds will outperform debt securities over the long term. Assets are invested in a prudent manner to maintain the security of funds while maximizing returns within the Company’s Investment Policy guidelines. The strategy is implemented utilizing indexed and actively managed assets from the categories listed.
The investment goals are to provide a total return that, over the long term, increases the ratio of plan assets to liabilities subject to an acceptable level of risk. This is accomplished through diversification of assets in accordance with the Investment Policy guidelines. Investment risk is mitigated by periodic rebalancing between asset classes as necessitated by changes in market conditions within the Investment Policy guidelines.private assets.
 Other investments are primarily made up of cash and master limited partnerships.

81

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Level 3 Gains and Losses
The change in the fair value of the plan’s Level 3 assets is summarized as follows:
  
Fair Value
May 25, 2014
 Realized Gains (Losses) 
Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
 Net Purchases and Sales 
Fair Value
May 31, 2015
Real estate funds $170.6
 $0.5
 $21.0
 $152.8
 $344.9
Multi-strategy hedge funds 462.3
 0.3
 22.8
 (0.9) 484.5
Private equity 81.3
 2.7
 (3.3) 12.3
 93.0
Private natural resources 16.6
 
 0.5
 2.8
 19.9
Total $730.8
 $3.5
 $41.0
 $167.0
 $942.3
  
Fair Value
May 26, 2013
 Realized Gains (Losses) 
Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
 Net Purchases and Sales 
Fair Value
May 25, 2014
Real estate funds $91.5
 $0.4
 $11.8
 $66.9
 $170.6
Multi-strategy hedge funds 413.9
 0.2
 21.2
 27.0
 462.3
Private equity 79.1
 3.2
 8.0
 (9.0) 81.3
Private natural resources 7.8
 
 1.5
 7.3
 16.6
Total $592.3
 $3.8
 $42.5
 $92.2
 $730.8
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the benefit obligation of the postretirement plans.
Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates at: May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017
Initial health care cost trend rate 9.0% 10.0% 7.87% 8.44%
Ultimate health care cost trend rate 4.5% 5.0% 4.5% 4.5%
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate 2023
 2022
 2024
 2024
A one percentage point change in assumed health care cost rates would have the following effect:
 
One  Percent
Increase
 
One  Percent
Decrease
 
One Percent
Increase
 
One Percent
Decrease
Effect on total service and interest cost $0.6
 $(0.5) $0.3
 $(0.3)
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation 14.0
 (12.5) 3.9
 (3.5)
We currently anticipate making contributions of approximately $13.0$19.6 million to our pension plans in fiscal 2016.2019. We anticipate making contributions of $23.7$16.2 million to our other postretirement plans in fiscal 2016.2019. These estimates are based on ERISA guidelines, current tax laws, plan asset performance, and liability assumptions, which are subject to change.
The following table presents estimated future gross benefit payments for our plans:
 Pension Benefits 
Health Care and Life Insurance
Benefits
 Pension Benefits 
Health Care and Life Insurance
Benefits
2016 $186.9
 $23.7
2017 190.3
 22.5
2018 197.5
 21.5
2019 204.3
 20.5
 $188.7
 $16.4
2020 211.2
 19.4
 184.2
 14.7
2021 186.5
 13.4
2022 189.0
 12.1
2023 191.3
 11.0
Succeeding 5 years 1,150.2
 80.9
 980.7
 40.1

82

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015,27, 2018, May 25, 2014,28, 2017, and May 26, 201329, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Multiemployer Pension Plans
The Company contributes to several multiemployer defined benefit pension plans under collective bargaining agreements that cover certain of its union-represented employees. The risks of participating in such plans are different from the risks of single-employer plans, in the following respects:
a.Assets contributed to a multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers.
b.If a participating employer ceases to contribute to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers.
c.If the Company ceases to have an obligation to contribute to a multiemployer plan in which it had been a contributing employer, it may be required to pay to the plan an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan and on the history of the Company’sCompany's participation in the plan prior to the cessation of its obligation to contribute. The amount that an employer that has ceased to have an obligation to contribute to a multiemployer plan is required to pay to the plan is referred to as a withdrawal liability.
The Company’sCompany's participation in multiemployer plans for the fiscal year ended May 31, 201527, 2018 is outlined in the table below. For each plan that is individually significant to the Company the following information is provided:
The “EIN"EIN / PN”PN" column provides the Employer Identification Number and the three-digit plan number assigned to a plan by the Internal Revenue Service.
The most recent Pension Protection Act Zone Status available for 20142017 and 20132016 is for plan years that ended in calendar years 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively. The zone status is based on information provided to the Company by each plan. A plan in the “red”"red" zone has been determined to be in “critical status”"critical status", based on criteria established under the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”("Code"), and is generally less than 65% funded. A plan in the “yellow”"yellow" zone has been determined to be in “endangered status”"endangered status", based on criteria established under the Code, and is generally less than 80% funded. A plan in the “green”"green" zone has been determined to be neither in “critical status”"critical status" nor in “endangered status”"endangered status", and is generally at least 80% funded.
The “FIP/"FIP/RP Status Pending/Implemented”Implemented" column indicates whether a Funding Improvement Plan, as required under the Code to be adopted by plans in the “yellow”"yellow" zone, or a Rehabilitation Plan, as required under the Code to be adopted by plans in the “red”"red" zone, is pending or has been implemented by the plan as of the end of the plan year that ended in calendar year 2014.2017.
Contributions by the Company are the amounts contributed in the Company’sCompany's fiscal periods ending in the specified year.
The “Surcharge Imposed”"Surcharge Imposed" column indicates whether the Company contribution rate for its fiscal year that ended on May 31, 201527, 2018 included an amount in addition to the contribution rate specified in the applicable collective bargaining agreement, as imposed by a plan in “critical status”"critical status", in accordance with the requirements of the Code.
The last column lists the expiration dates of the collective bargaining agreements pursuant to which the Company contributes to the plans.
For plans that are not individually significant to ConAgra FoodsConagra Brands the total amount of contributions is presented in the aggregate.

83

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015,27, 2018, May 25, 2014,28, 2017, and May 26, 201329, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

  
Pension Protection Act
Zone Status
FIP /
RP Status
Pending /
Implemented
Contributions by
the Company
(millions)
  
Expiration
Dates of
Collective
Bargaining
Agreements
  
Pension Protection Act
Zone Status
FIP /
RP Status
Pending /
Implemented
Contributions by
the Company
(millions)
  
Expiration
Dates of
Collective
Bargaining
Agreements
Pension FundEIN / PN20142013FY15FY14FY13
Surcharge
Imposed
EIN / PN20172016FY18FY17FY16
Surcharge
Imposed
Bakery and Confectionary Union and Industry International Pension Plan
52-6118572
/ 001
RedRP Implemented$3.7
$3.5$2.1No2/29/2016 to 5/18/201852-6118572
/ 001
Red, Critical and DecliningRed, Critical and DecliningRP Implemented$1.5
$1.8
$3.1No2/28/2020
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund
36-6044243
/ 001
RedRP Implemented2.0
2.11.2No6/30/2015 to 6/04/201736-6044243
/ 001
Red, Critical and DecliningRedRP Implemented1.8
1.8
1.9No5/31/2020
National Conference of Fireman & Oilers National Pension Fund52-6085445 / 003YellowFIP Implemented0.6
0.70.3No11/19/2015
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan
91-6145047
/ 001
GreenN/A4.9
4.94.9No06/30/2015 to 03/31/201891-6145047
/ 001
GreenN/A2.8
4.0
5.4No06/30/2018
Other PlansOther Plans0.8
1.20.9  Other Plans0.4
0.4
0.7  
Total ContributionsTotal Contributions$12.0
$12.4$9.4 Total Contributions$6.5
$8.0$11.1 
The Company will be listed in its plans' Forms 5500 as providing more than 5% of the plan's total contributions for the National Conference of Firemen & Oilers National Pension Fund for the plan year ending in calendar year 2014.
The Company was not listed in the Forms 5500 filed by any of the other plans or for any of the other years as providing more than 5% of the plan’splan's total contributions. At the date our financial statements were issued, Forms 5500 were not available for plan years ending in calendar year 2014.2017.
On May 31, 2018, subsequent to the end of fiscal 2018, we ceased to participate in the Bakery and Confectionary Union and Industry International Fund in conjunction with our sale of the Trenton, Missouri plant.
In addition to the contributions listed in the table above, we recorded an additional expense of $0.4$0.6 million,, $0.2 $4.0 million, and $14.2$31.8 million in fiscal 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, respectively, related to our expected incurrence of certain withdrawal costs.
Certain of our employees are covered under defined contribution plans. The expense related to these plans was $40.6$24.5 million,, $40.2 $18.0 million,, and $30.7$35.4 million in fiscal 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, respectively.

20. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
FASB guidance establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price assets or liabilities. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities,
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets, and
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions and best estimate of what inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
The fair values of our Level 2 derivative instruments were determined using valuation models that use market observable inputs including interest rate curves and both forward and spot prices for currencies and commodities. Derivative assets and liabilities included in Level 2 primarily represent commodity and foreign currency option and forward contracts interest rate swaps, and cross-currency swaps.

84

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015,27, 2018, May 25, 2014,28, 2017, and May 26, 201329, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of May 31, 2015:
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets:       
Derivative assets$13.6
 $18.6
 $
 $32.2
Available-for-sale securities2.8
 
 
 2.8
Deferred compensation assets2.6
 
 
 2.6
Total assets$19.0
 $18.6
 $
 $37.6
Liabilities:       
Derivative liabilities$
 $14.2
 $
 $14.2
Deferred compensation liabilities44.6
 
 
 44.6
Total liabilities$44.6
 $14.2
 $
 $58.8
The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of May 25, 201427, 2018:
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 TotalLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets:              
Derivative assets$8.5
 $30.3
 $
 $38.8
$1.7
 $2.7
 $
 $4.4
Available-for-sale securities2.1
 
 
 2.1
4.8
 
 
 4.8
Deferred compensation assets5.6
 
 
 5.6
Total assets$16.2
 $30.3
 $
 $46.5
$6.5
 $2.7
 $
 $9.2
Liabilities:              
Derivative liabilities$
 $10.4
 $
 $10.4
$
 $0.1
 $
 $0.1
Deferred compensation liabilities43.7
 
 
 43.7
51.6
 
 
 51.6
Total liabilities$43.7
 $10.4
 $
 $54.1
$51.6
 $0.1
 $
 $51.7
The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of May 28, 2017:
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets:       
Derivative assets$2.0
 $0.3
 $
 $2.3
Available-for-sale securities3.5
 
 
 3.5
Total assets$5.5
 $0.3
 $
 $5.8
Liabilities:       
Derivative liabilities$
 $1.3
 $
 $1.3
Deferred compensation liabilities47.2
 
 
 47.2
Total liabilities$47.2
 $1.3
 $
 $48.5
Certain assets and liabilities, including long-lived assets, goodwill, asset retirement obligations, and cost and equity investments are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
During fiscal 2015 and 2014, goodwill impairment charges of $1.53 billion and $602.2 million, respectively, were recognized within the Private Brands segment. See Note 9 for a discussion of the methodology employed to measure these impairments.
During fiscal 2015 and 2014, impairments of certain indefinite-lived brands were recognized in the amounts of $48.8 million and $75.7 million, respectively. The impairment charges totaled $4.8 million in the Consumer Foods segment, $0.3 million in the Commercial Foods segment, and $43.7 million in the Private Brands segment for fiscal 2015, and $72.5 million in the Consumer Foods and $3.2 million in the Private Brands segments for fiscal 2014. The fair values of these brands were estimated using the “relief from royalty” method (see Note 9).
During fiscal 2015,2018, a charge of $13.7$4.7 million was recognized in the Private BrandsCorporate segment for the impairment of certain long-lived assets. The impairment was measured based upon anthe estimated disposal value forsales price of the related production facility.assets.
During fiscal 2014, the $20.3 million carrying amount of2017, a potato processing and storage facility (level 3 asset) was written down to its fair value of $3.8 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $16.5 million to selling, general and administrative expenses in the Commercial Foods segment. The fair value measurement used to determine the impairment was based upon the expected sales price.
During fiscal 2014, the $19.7 million carrying amount of a processing facility acquired from an onion supplier (level 3 asset) was written-down to its fair value of $10.8 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $8.9 million. The fair value

85

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

measurement used to determine the impairment was based upon the expected sales price. The impairment charge is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Commercial Foods segment (see Note 17).
During fiscal 2014, the $68.9 million carrying amount of assets held for sale (level 3 assets, which were disposed of in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014) of the discontinued operations of Medallion Foods within the Private Brands segment were written-down to their fair value of $43.5 million. The resulting impairment charge of $25.4 million is included in discontinued operations. The fair value measurement used to determine the impairment was based upon the expected business sales price (see Note 6).
During fiscal 2014, an impairment charge of $3.2$27.6 million was recognized in corporate expenses, as the company determined an amortizing technology licenseGrocery & Snacks segment for the impairment of our Wesson® oil production facility. The impairment was no longer expected to produce future economic benefit.  Accordingly,measured based upon the carrying valueestimated sales price of the asset was entirely written off.facility (See Note 6).
During fiscal 2017, goodwill impairment charges totaling $198.9 million were recognized within our International segment. See Note 9 for discussion of the methodology employed to measure these impairments.
During fiscal 2018, we recognized indefinite-lived brand impairment charges of $4.0 million in our Grocery & Snacks segment and $0.8 million in our International segment. We recognized indefinite-lived brand impairment charges of $37.0 million in our International segment and $68.2 million in our Grocery & Snacks segment for fiscal 2017, and $50.1 million in our Grocery and Snacks segment for fiscal 2016. The fair values of these brands were estimated using the "relief from royalty" method (See Note 9).
The carrying amount of long-term debt (including current installments) was $7.9$3.54 billion as of May 31, 201527, 2018 and $8.9$2.97 billion as of May 25, 2014.28, 2017. Based on current market rates, the fair value of this debt (level 2 liabilities) at May 31, 201527, 2018 and May 25, 201428, 2017 was estimated at $8.3$3.76 billion and $9.5$3.32 billion,, respectively. Included in the May 25, 2014 long-term debt carrying amount, and excluded from the above fair value table, is $0.5 billion of hedged debt that, along with the related hedge instruments, was adjusted for changes in fair value based solely on the change in the related benchmark interest rate. The hedging instruments were terminated in the third quarter of fiscal 2015 (see Notes 4 and 18).


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

21. BUSINESS SEGMENTS AND RELATED INFORMATION
During fiscal 2017, we reorganized our reporting segments. We reportnow reflect our results of operations in threefive reporting segments: Consumer Foods,Grocery & Snacks, Refrigerated & Frozen, International, Foodservice, and Commercial. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the revised segment presentation.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2017, we completed the Spinoff of Lamb Weston. The Lamb Weston business had previously been included in the Commercial Foods, and Private Brands.segment. The results of operations of the Lamb Weston business have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
The Consumer FoodsGrocery & Snacks reporting segment principally includes branded, shelf-stable food products sold in various retail channels primarily in North America. Ourthe United States.
The Refrigerated & Frozen reporting segment includes branded, temperature-controlled food products are sold in a variety of categories (meals, entrees, condiments, sides, snacks, and desserts) in various retail channels across frozen, refrigerated,in the United States.
The International reporting segment principally includes branded food products, in various temperature states, sold in various retail and shelf-stable temperature classes.foodservice channels outside of the United States.
The Foodservice reporting segment includes branded and customized food products, including meals, entrees, sauces and a variety of custom-manufactured culinary products packaged for sale to restaurants and other foodservice establishments primarily in the United States.
The Commercial Foods reporting segment includesincluded commercially branded and private brandedlabel food and ingredients, which arewere sold primarily to commercial, restaurants,restaurant, foodservice, food manufacturing, and industrial customers. The segment's primary food items include: frozen potato and sweet potato items, as well asincluded a variety of vegetable, spice, and frozen bakery and grain productsgoods, which arewere sold under brands such asLamb Weston® and Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings®.
The Private Brands reporting segment principally includes private brandSpicetec and customized food products which areJM Swank businesses were sold in various retail channels, primarily in North America. The products include a varietythe first quarter of categories including: bars, cereal, snacks, condiments, pasta, and retail bakery products.fiscal 2017.
We do not aggregate operating segments when determining our reporting segments.
Intersegment sales have been recorded at amounts approximating market. Operating profit for each of the segments is based on net sales less all identifiable operating expenses. General corporate expense, net interest expense, and income taxes have been excluded from segment operations. In the first quarter of fiscal 2015, we revised the manner in which we allocate corporate expenses to our reporting segments. As a result, operating profit and general corporate expenses have been reclassified to reflect this change.


86

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015,27, 2018, May 25, 2014,28, 2017, and May 26, 201329, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

 2015 2014 2013
Net sales     
Consumer Foods$7,304.4
 $7,315.7
 $7,551.4
Commercial Foods4,463.2
 4,332.2
 4,109.7
Private Brands4,064.8
 4,195.7
 1,808.2
Total net sales$15,832.4
 $15,843.6
 $13,469.3
Operating profit (loss)     
Consumer Foods$1,069.7
 $892.0
 $984.4
Commercial Foods568.5
 537.7
 585.5
Private Brands(1,456.7) (373.4) 125.4
Total operating profit$181.5
 $1,056.3
 $1,695.3
Equity method investment earnings     
Consumer Foods$3.0
 $2.8
 $1.8
Commercial Foods119.1
 29.7
 35.7
Total equity method investment earnings$122.1
 $32.5
 $37.5
Operating profit (loss) plus equity method investment earnings     
Consumer Foods$1,072.7
 $894.8
 $986.2
Commercial Foods687.6
 567.4
 621.2
Private Brands(1,456.7) (373.4) 125.4
Total operating profit plus equity method investment earnings$303.6
 $1,088.8
 $1,732.8
General corporate expenses$345.1
 $315.6
 $396.3
Interest expense, net331.9
 379.4
 276.2
Income tax expense234.0
 220.1
 361.9
Income (loss) from continuing operations$(607.4) $173.7
 $698.4
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests11.8
 12.0
 12.2
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc.$(619.2) $161.7
 $686.2
Identifiable assets     
Consumer Foods$7,568.5
 $7,666.1
 $7,845.5
Commercial Foods3,991.1
 3,127.4
 2,972.4
Private Brands5,144.7
 6,912.4
 7,676.5
Corporate837.9
 783.0
 956.7
Held for Sale
 830.6
 898.7
Total identifiable assets$17,542.2
 $19,319.5
 $20,349.8
Additions to property, plant and equipment     
Consumer Foods$133.7
 $183.5
 $187.9
Commercial Foods117.8
 206.4
 117.7
Private Brands101.6
 125.2
 57.0
Corporate118.8
 77.2
 60.0
Total additions to property, plant and equipment$471.9
 $592.3
 $422.6
Depreciation and amortization     
Consumer Foods$200.9
 $182.2
 $183.1
Commercial Foods113.5
 100.1
 84.4
Private Brands202.1
 214.8
 79.9
Corporate75.8
 80.2
 71.2
Total depreciation and amortization$592.3
 $577.3
 $418.6
 2018 2017 2016
Net sales     
Grocery & Snacks$3,287.0
 $3,208.8
 $3,377.1
Refrigerated & Frozen2,753.0
 2,652.7
 2,867.8
International843.5
 816.0
 846.6
Foodservice1,054.8
 1,078.3
 1,104.5
Commercial
 71.1
 468.1
Total net sales$7,938.3
 $7,826.9
 $8,664.1
Operating profit     
Grocery & Snacks$724.8
 $653.7
 $592.9
Refrigerated & Frozen479.4
 445.8
 420.4
International86.5
 (168.9) 66.7
Foodservice121.8
 105.1
 97.7
Commercial
 202.6
 45.4
Total operating profit$1,412.5
 $1,238.3
 $1,223.1
Equity method investment earnings97.3
 71.2
 66.1
General corporate expenses379.0
 313.3
 818.5
Interest expense, net158.7
 195.5
 295.8
Income tax expense174.6
 254.7
 46.4
Income from continuing operations$797.5
 $546.0
 $128.5
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of continuing operations3.4
 1.9
 1.9
Income from continuing operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.$794.1
 $544.1
 $126.6

87

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Net sales by product type within each segment were:
  2015 2014 2013
Net sales      
Consumer Foods:      
Grocery $3,911.1
 $3,897.0
 $4,093.4
Frozen 2,261.9
 2,241.9
 2,295.5
International 1,026.1
 1,061.4
 1,073.7
Other Brands 105.3
 115.4
 88.8
Total Consumer Foods $7,304.4
 $7,315.7
 $7,551.4
Commercial Foods:      
Specialty Potatoes $2,892.4
 $2,792.7
 $2,753.1
Foodservice 1,570.8
 1,539.5
 1,356.6
Total Commercial Foods $4,463.2
 $4,332.2
 $4,109.7
Private Brands:      
Snacks $1,340.3
 $1,373.2
 $542.0
Retail Bakery 719.4
 772.5
 234.6
Bars and Coordinated 724.9
 679.5
 535.2
Pasta 532.6
 564.3
 192.9
Cereal 475.2
 496.7
 191.6
Condiments 272.4
 309.5
 111.9
Total Private Brands $4,064.8
 $4,195.7
 $1,808.2
Total net sales $15,832.4
 $15,843.6
 $13,469.3
 2018 2017 2016
Shelf-stable$4,660.1
 $4,682.4
 $5,256.8
Temperature-controlled3,278.2
 3,144.5
 3,407.3
Total net sales$7,938.3
 $7,826.9
 $8,664.1
Presentation of Derivative Gains (Losses) for Economic Hedges of Forecasted Cash Flows in Segment Results
Derivatives used to manage commodity price risk and foreign currency risk are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. We believe these derivatives provide economic hedges of certain forecasted transactions. As such, these derivatives are recognized at fair market value with realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in general corporate expenses. The gains and losses are subsequently recognized in the operating results of the reporting segments in the period in which the underlying transaction being economically hedged is included in earnings. In the event that management determines a particular derivative entered into as an economic hedge of a forecasted commodity purchase has ceased to function as an economic hedge, we cease recognizing further gains and losses on such derivatives in corporate expense and begin recognizing such gains and losses within segment operating results, immediately.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

The following table presents the net derivative gains (losses) from economic hedges of forecasted commodity consumption and the foreign currency risk of certain forecasted transactions, under this methodology:
2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Net derivative gains (losses) incurred$(108.5) $24.4
 $73.1
$(0.9) $0.6
 $(7.4)
Less: Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to reporting segments(58.3) (12.4) 24.1
(7.1) 5.7
 (23.8)
Net derivative gains (losses) recognized in general corporate expenses$(50.2) $36.8
 $49.0
$6.2
 $(5.1) $16.4
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Consumer Foods$(41.9) $(5.9) $26.7
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Commercial Foods(4.7) 4.3
 (3.6)
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Private Brands(11.7) (10.8) 1.0
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Grocery & Snacks$0.2
 $3.4
 $(14.4)
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to Refrigerated & Frozen(0.3) 0.8
 (6.2)
Net derivative gains (losses) allocated to International(6.9) 1.6
 (0.5)
Net derivative losses allocated to Foodservice(0.1) 
 (1.0)
Net derivative losses allocated to Commercial
 (0.1) (1.7)
Net derivative gains (losses) included in segment operating profit$(58.3) $(12.4) $24.1
$(7.1) $5.7
 $(23.8)
As of May 31, 2015,27, 2018, the cumulative amount of net derivative lossesgains from economic hedges that had been recognized in general corporate expenses and not yet allocated to reporting segments was $23.3 million. This amount reflected net losses

88

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

$3.2 million, all of $23.7 millionwhich was incurred during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2015, as well as net gains of $0.4 million incurred prior to fiscal 2015.27, 2018. Based on our forecasts of the timing of recognition of the underlying hedged items, we expect to reclassify to segment operating results lossesgains of $23.5$2.5 million in fiscal 20162019 and gains of $0.2$0.7 million in fiscal 20172020 and thereafter.
In
Assets by Segment

The majority of our manufacturing assets are shared across multiple reporting segments. Output from these facilities used by each reporting segment can change over time. Also, working capital balances are not tracked by reporting segment. Therefore, it is impracticable to allocate those assets to the second quarter ofreporting segments, as well as disclose total assets by segment. Total depreciation expense for fiscal 2015, management determined that certain derivatives that had been previously entered into as an economic hedge of forecasted commodity purchases had ceased to function as economic hedges. We recognized $18.92018, 2017, and 2016 was $222.1 million, $5.2$234.4 million, and $1.4$243.9 million, of net derivative losses during fiscal 2015 within the operating results of the Consumer Foods, Private Brands, and Commercial Foods segments, respectively, in connection with these derivatives. Management effectively exited these derivative positions in the third quarter of fiscal 2015.respectively.
Other Information
At May 31, 2015, ConAgra Foods and its subsidiaries had approximately 32,900 employees, primarily in the United States. Approximately 32% of our employees are parties to collective bargaining agreements. Of the employees subject to collective bargaining agreements, approximately 25% are parties to collective bargaining agreements scheduled to expire during fiscal 2016.
Our operations are principally in the United States. With respect to operations outside of the United States, no single foreign country or geographic region was significant with respect to consolidated operations for fiscal 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013.2016. Foreign net sales, including sales by domestic segments to customers located outside of the United States, were approximately $1.9 billion, $2.0 billion,$918.4 million, $887.2 million, and $1.7 billion$937.9 million in fiscal 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, respectively. Our long-lived assets located outside of the United States are not significant.
Our largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores,Walmart, Inc. and its affiliates, accounted for approximately 18%, 19%,24% of consolidated net sales for both fiscal 2018 and 20%2017 and 23% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively,2016, significantly impacting the Consumer FoodsGrocery & Snacks and Private BrandsRefrigerated & Frozen segments.
Wal-Mart Stores,Walmart, Inc. and its affiliates accounted for approximately 16%25% and 26% of consolidated net receivables as of both May 31, 201527, 2018 and May 25, 2014, significantly impacting28, 2017, respectively.
We offer certain suppliers access to a third-party service that allows them to view our scheduled payments online. The third-party service also allows suppliers to finance advances on our scheduled payments at the Consumer Foodssole discretion of the supplier and Private Brands segments.the third-party. We have no economic interest in these financing arrangements and no direct relationship with the suppliers, the third-party, or any financial institutions concerning this service. All of our accounts payable remain as obligations to our suppliers as stated in our supplier agreements. As of May 27, 2018, $103.1 million of our total accounts payable is payable to suppliers who utilize this third-party service.


89


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2015,27, 2018, May 25, 2014,28, 2017, and May 26, 201329, 2016
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

22. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited)
2015 20142018 2017
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
Net sales$3,701.0
 $4,150.0
 $3,876.7
 $4,104.7
 $3,715.8
 $4,221.1
 $3,947.3
 $3,959.4
$1,804.2
 $2,173.4
 $1,994.5
 $1,966.2
 $1,895.6
 $2,088.4
 $1,981.2
 $1,861.7
Gross profit695.7
 880.1
 820.0
 912.7
 792.1
 959.8
 916.5
 843.5
519.0
 658.3
 598.8
 575.4
 544.6
 647.5
 621.0
 529.0
Income from continuing operations, net of tax153.6
 224.1
 349.2
 70.6
 98.6
 114.3
 179.5
 153.6
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax373.3
 (10.7) (0.6) 4.6
 13.8
 42.0
 10.8
 74.8
(0.3) 0.4
 14.5
 (0.3) 91.4
 11.6
 0.7
 (1.7)
Net income (loss) attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc.482.3
 10.0
 (954.1) 209.2
 144.3
 248.7
 234.3
 (324.2)
Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc.152.5
 223.5
 362.8
 69.6
 186.2
 122.1
 179.7
 151.3
Earnings per share (1):
                              
Basic earnings per share:                              
Net income (loss) attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders$1.14
 $0.02
 $(2.23) $0.49
 $0.34
 $0.59
 $0.56
 $(0.77)
Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders$0.37
 $0.55
 $0.91
 $0.18
 $0.42
 $0.28
 $0.42
 $0.36
Diluted earnings per share:                              
Net income (loss) attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders$1.12
 $0.02
 $(2.23) $0.48
 $0.34
 $0.58
 $0.55
 $(0.77)
Dividends declared per common share$0.25
 $0.25
 $0.25
 $0.25
 $0.25
 $0.25
 $0.25
 $0.25
Share price:               
Net income attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc. common stockholders$0.36
 $0.54
 $0.90
 $0.18
 $0.42
 $0.28
 $0.41
 $0.36
Dividends declared per common share (3)
$0.2125
 $0.2125
 $0.2125
 $0.2125
 $0.25
 $0.25
 $0.20
 $0.20
Share price (2):
               
High$32.85
 $35.65
 $37.29
 $38.90
 $37.23
 $34.51
 $34.05
 $31.61
$39.95
 $35.87
 $38.50
 $38.29
 $48.39
 $48.68
 $41.16
 $41.50
Low28.73
 31.87
 33.57
 33.58
 32.83
 30.09
 28.50
 28.26
33.07
 32.43
 35.47
 35.34
 45.70
 34.30
 36.47
 37.29
(1) 
Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated independently for each of the quarters presented. Accordingly, the sum of the quarterly earnings per share amounts may not agree with the total year.
(2)
Historical market prices do not reflect any adjustment for the impact of the Lamb Weston Spinoff.
(3)
Per share dividend declared in the third quarter and fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 includes impact of the Lamb Weston Spinoff.

23. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent to fiscal 2015, on June 30, 2015, we announced our plan to sell substantially all of the Private Brand operations. The planned sale did not meet the criteria specified in applicable accounting guidance in order for the related assets and liabilities to be classified as held-for-sale for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2015, therefore, the results of operations of that business are included in our results of continuing operations. When, and if, the criteria of the applicable accounting guidance are met, we will reclassify the assets and liabilities expected to be included in the sale to assets and liabilities held for sale, and we will report the results of operations of the Private Brands business as discontinued operations for all periods presented in our financial statements. In the event that the estimated sales price from the planned sale of the Private Brands business is less than the carrying amount of our investment in that business, we may recognize a material impairment loss within results of discontinued operations.
Subsequent to fiscal 2015, on June 1, 2015, we entered into an agreement with a third party wherein we have rights to the use of certain intellectual property designed to assist the Company in improving the operating efficiency of its manufacturing operations.  Also included in the contract is the right to receive certain services from a consulting group to assist in implementing improvement processes at the Company’s manufacturing facilities. In connection with this agreement, the Company is required to make annual payments ranging from $15 million to $20 million to the third party for a total of $130 million. This agreement requires such contractual payments to occur each year from fiscal 2016 through fiscal 2022. 



90


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors and Stockholders
ConAgra Foods,Conagra Brands, Inc.:

Opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ConAgra Foods,Conagra Brands, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of May 31, 201527, 2018 and May 25, 2014, and28, 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), common stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three‑yearthree-year period ended May 31, 2015. These27, 2018, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements arestatements). We also have audited the responsibilityCompany’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 27, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.Treadway Commission.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ConAgra Foods, Inc. and subsidiariesthe Company as of May 31, 201527, 2018 and May 25, 2014,28, 2017, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three‑yearthree-year period ended May 31, 2015,27, 2018, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, Also in accordance withour opinion, the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’smaintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2015,27, 2018, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO),Commission.

Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and our report dated July 17, 2015 expressedfor its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness ofCompany’s consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and

directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2005.

Omaha, Nebraska
July 17, 201520, 2018


91




ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company's management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of May 31, 201527, 2018. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter covered by this report and determined that there was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal 20152018 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

ConAgra Foods'Conagra Brands' management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting of ConAgra FoodsConagra Brands (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). ConAgra Foods'Conagra Brands' internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. ConAgra Foods'Conagra Brands' internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of ConAgra Foods;Conagra Brands; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of ConAgra FoodsConagra Brands are being made only in accordance with the authorization of management and directors of ConAgra Foods;Conagra Brands; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of ConAgra Foods'Conagra Brands' assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluations of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of the changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

With the participation of ConAgra Foods'Conagra Brands' Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management assessed the effectiveness of ConAgra Foods'Conagra Brands' internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2015.27, 2018. In making this assessment, management used criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”("COSO"). As a result of this assessment, management concluded that, as of May 31, 2015,27, 2018, its internal control over financial reporting was effective.

The effectiveness of ConAgra Foods'Conagra Brands' internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 201527, 2018 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, a copy of which is included in this Annual Reportannual report on Form 10-K.

/s/ SEAN M. CONNOLLY
Sean M. Connolly
President and Chief Executive Officer
July 17, 201520, 2018
/s/ JOHN F. GEHRINGDAVID S. MARBERGER
John F. GehringDavid S. Marberger
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
July 17, 201520, 2018

92




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
ConAgra Foods, Inc.:

We have audited ConAgra Foods, Inc.'s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2015, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, ConAgra Foods, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2015, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of May 31, 2015 and May 25, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), common stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 31, 2015, and our report dated July 17, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/  KPMG LLP

Omaha, Nebraska
July 17, 2015


93



ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information with respect to our Directorsdirectors will be set forth in the 20152018 Proxy Statement under the heading “Voting"Voting Item #1—#1: Election of Directors," and the information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding our executive officers is included in Part I of this Form 10-K under the heading “Executive"Executive Officers of the Registrant as of July 20, 2018," as permitted by Instruction 3 to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K.
Information with respect to compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, by our Directors,directors, executive officers, and holders of more than ten percent of our equity securities will be set forth in the 20152018 Proxy Statement under the heading “Section"Information on Stock Ownership—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance," and the information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information with respect to the Audit / Finance Committee and the audit committee’sits financial experts will be set forth in the 20152018 Proxy Statement under the heading “Board"Voting Item #1: Election of Directors—Roles and Responsibilities of the Board and its Committees—Audit / Finance Committee," and the information is incorporated herein by reference.
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Controller. This code of ethics is available on our website at www.conagrafoods.comwww.conagrabrands.com through the “Investors—"Investors—Corporate Governance”Governance" link. If we make any amendments to this code other than technical, administrative, or other non-substantive amendments, or grant any waivers, including implicit waivers, from a provision of this code of conduct to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, or Controller, we will disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver, its effective date, and to whom it applies on our website at www.conagrafoods.comwww.conagrabrands.com through the “Investors—"Investors—Corporate Governance”Governance" link.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information with respect to director and executive compensation and our Human Resources Committee will be set forth in the 20152018 Proxy Statement under the headings “Non-Employee"Voting Item #1: Election of Directors—Non-Employee Director Compensation,” “Board" "Voting Item #1: Election of Directors—Roles and Responsibilities of the Board and its Committees—Human Resources Committee," "Compensation Committee Report," and “Executive"Executive Compensation," and the information is incorporated herein by reference.

94




ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners, directors and management will be set forth in the 20152018 Proxy Statement under the heading “Information"Information on Stock Ownership," and the information is incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information about shares of our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants, and rights under existing equity compensation plans as of our most recent fiscal year-end, May 31, 201527, 2018.
Plan Category 
Number of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants, and Rights
(a)
 
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants, and
Rights
(b)
 
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))
(c)
 
Number of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants, and Rights
(a)
 
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants, and
Rights
(b)
 
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1) 19,522,930
 $28.28
 29,087,756
 8,437,925
 $28.11
 42,456,481
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 
 
 
 
 
 
Total 19,522,930
 $28.28
 29,087,756
 8,437,925
 $28.11
 42,456,481
 
(1)
Column (a) includes 1,122,9451,130,292 shares that could be issued under performance shares outstanding at May 31, 201527, 2018. The performance shares are earned and common stock issued if pre-set financial objectives are met. ActualIncluded are 402,666 shares for two-thirds of the fiscal 2016 through 2018 performance period and one-third of the fiscal 2017 through 2019 performance period, for which the performance has been determined. For the remaining performance periods, actual shares issued may be equal to, less than, or greater than the number of outstanding performance shares included in column (a), depending on actual performance. Column (b) does not take these awards into account because they do not have an exercise price. The number of shares reflected in column (a) with respect to these performance shares for which the performance has not been determined assumes the vesting criteria will be achieved at target levels. Column (c) has not been reduced for the performance shares outstanding. Column (b) also excludes 2,159,5091,775,294 restricted stock units and 705,075416,496 deferral interests in deferred compensation plans that are included in column (a) but do not have an exercise price. The units vest and are payable in common stock after expiration of the time periods set forth in the related agreements. The interests in the deferred compensation plans are settled in common stock on the schedules selected by the participants.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information with respect to Directordirector independence and certain relationships and related transactions will be set forth in the 20152018 Proxy Statement under the headings “Voting"Voting Item #1—#1: Election of Directors—Consideration of Director Independence”Independence," "Voting Item #1: Election of Directors—Roles and “BoardResponsibilities of the Board and its Committees—Audit / Finance Committee," and "Board"Voting Item #1: Election of Directors—Roles and Responsibilities of the Board and its Committees—Human Resources Committee" and the information is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information with respect to the principal accountant will be set forth in the 20152018 Proxy Statement under the heading “Voting"Voting Item #2: Ratification of the Appointment of Our Independent Auditor for Fiscal 2019," and the information is incorporated herein by reference.


PART IV

95



ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
a)    List of documents filed as part of this report:`
1.    Financial Statements
All financial statements of the Company as set forth under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2.    Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule
Number
Description
Page
Number
S-IIValuation and Qualifying Accounts
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm99
All otherfinancial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, or not required, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements, notes thereto.
3.    Exhibits
All exhibits as set forth on the Exhibit Index, which is incorporated herein by reference.

96




SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, ConAgra Foods, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CONAGRA FOODS, INC.
By:/s/ SEAN M. CONNOLLY
Sean M. Connolly
President and Chief Executive Officer
July 17, 2015
By:/s/ JOHN F. GEHRING
John F. Gehring
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
July 17, 2015
By:/s/  ROBERT G. WISE
Robert G. Wise
Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller
July 17, 2015

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 17th day of July, 2015.
Sean M. Connolly*Director
Mogens C. Bay*Director
Stephen G. Butler*Director
Steven F. Goldstone*Director
Joie A. Gregor*Director
Rajive Johri*Director
W.G. Jurgensen*Director
Richard H. Lenny*Director
Ruth Ann Marshall*Director
Andrew J. Schindler*Director
Kenneth E. Stinson*Director
Thomas K. Brown*Director
*     John F. Gehring, by signing his name hereto, signs this annual report on behalf of each person indicated. Powers-of-Attorney authorizing John F. Gehring to sign this annual report on Form 10-K on behalf of each of the indicated Directors of ConAgra Foods, Inc. have been filed herein as Exhibit 24.

By:/s/  JOHN F. GEHRING
John F. Gehring
Attorney-In-Fact


97



Schedule II
CONAGRA FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
For the Fiscal Years ended May 31, 2015, May 25, 2014, and May 26, 2013
(Dollars in millions)
Description 
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 
Additions
Charged
to Costs  and
Expenses
 Other 
Deductions
from
Reserves
 
Balance at
Close of
Period
Year ended May 31, 2015          
Allowance for doubtful receivables $4.0
 2.8
 (0.2)
(1) 
2.0
(3) 
$4.6
Year ended May 25, 2014          
Allowance for doubtful receivables $5.9
 1.3
 

3.2
(3) 
$4.0
Year ended May 26, 2013          
Allowance for doubtful receivables $4.6
 0.2
 2.3
(2) 
1.2
(3) 
$5.9
(1)
Primarily translation incurred during fiscal 2015.
(2)
Primarily allowances acquired through fiscal 2013 business acquisitions.
(3)
Bad debts charged off and adjustments to previous reserves, less recoveries.


98



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
ConAgra Foods, Inc.:
Under date of July 17, 2015, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of ConAgra Foods, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of May 31, 2015 and May 25, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), common stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 31, 2015, which are included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2015. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related consolidated financial statement schedule as listed in the Index at Item 15. This consolidated financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this consolidated financial statement schedule based on our audits.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/    KPMG LLP
Omaha, Nebraska
July 17, 2015

99




EXHIBIT INDEX
All documents referenced below were filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, by ConAgra Foods,Conagra Brands, Inc. (file number 001-07275), unless otherwise noted.
EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION
   
*2.22.1 
   
*2.2.12.1.1 
   
*2.2.22.1.2 
   
*2.2.32.1.3 
   
*2.2.42.1.4 
   
*2.2.52.1.5 
*2.2
*2.2.1
2.2.2


*2.3
*2.4
   
3.1 ConAgra Foods'
   
3.2 
   
4.1 Indenture, dated as of October 8, 1990, between Conagra Brands, Inc. (formerly ConAgra Foods, Inc.) and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and The Chase Manhattan Bank (National Association)), as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of ConAgra Foods'Conagra Brands’ Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 033-36967)
   
4.2
4.2.1
**10.1 
   
**10.1.1 
   
**10.2 
   
**10.2.1 
   

100



**10.2.2 
**10.2.3
**10.2.4
   
**10.3 
   
**10.3.1 


**10.3.2
   
**10.4 
   
**10.4.1 
   
**10.4.2 
   
**10.4.3 
   
**10.4.4 
   
**10.4.5 
**10.4.6
**10.4.7
**10.4.8
   
**10.5 ConAgra Foods 1995 Stock Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of ConAgra Foods' annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 29, 2005
**10.6ConAgra Foods 2000 Stock Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of ConAgra Foods' annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 29, 2005
**10.7Amendment dated May 2, 2002 to ConAgra Foods Stock Plans and other Plans, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of ConAgra Foods' annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 26, 2002
**10.8
   
**10.8.110.5.1 
   
**10.8.210.5.2 
   
**10.8.310.5.3 
   
**10.8.410.5.4 
   

101



**10.8.4.110.5.4.1 
   
**10.8.510.5.5 


   
**10.910.6 
   
**10.9.110.6.1 
   
**10.9.210.6.2 
   
**10.9.310.6.3 
   
**10.9.410.6.4 
   
**10.9.4.110.6.4.1 
   
**10.9.4.210.6.4.2 
   
**10.9.510.6.5 
   
**10.9.610.6.6 
   
**10.9.710.6.7 
   
**10.9.810.6.8 
   
**10.1010.7 

   
**10.10.110.7.1 
**10.7.2
   
**10.10.210.7.3 
   
**10.10.310.7.4 
   
**10.10.410.7.5 


**10.7.6
   
**10.1110.7.7 
**10.8
   

102



**10.1210.9 
   
**10.1310.10 
**10.10.1
**10.11
**10.12
**10.13
   
**10.14 
CEO Performance Share Plan for Transitional Awards, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ConAgra Foods’ current report on Form 8-K filed February 12, 2015

**10.15ConAgra Foods, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan Requirements dated December 10, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of ConAgra Foods' quarterly reportConagra Brands’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 27, 2011
   
**10.1610.15 
   
**10.16.110.16 
   
**10.17 
   
**10.18 Amended and Restated
   
**10.18.1 
   
**10.19 Stock Option
   
**10.20 


   
**10.21 Change of Control
**10.21.1
   
**10.22 
**10.23Amendment to Stock Option Agreements between ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Brian L. Keck dated March 14, 2014
**10.24Letter Agreement between ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Paul Maass dated May 16, 2013, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of ConAgra Foods' annual reportConagra Brands’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 26, 201328, 2017
   
**10.23
10.24
10.25 
   
10.26 Credit
10.27
10.28
10.29
10.26.1Amendment No. 1 to the Revolving Credit Agreement, entered into as of December 21, 2012, among ConAgra Foods, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as administrative agent and a lender and the other financial institutions party thereto, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of ConAgra Foods'Conagra Brands’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 27, 2012

103



10.26.2Amendment No. 2 towith the Revolving Credit Agreement entered into as of August 27, 2013, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ConAgra Foods, quarterly reportSEC on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended November 24, 2013
10.26.3
Amendment No. 3 to the Revolving Credit Agreement, entered into as of March 23, 2015, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ConAgra Foods Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2015

July 17, 2018
   
10.27Term Loan Agreement, entered into as of December 21, 2012, among ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, JPMorgan Bank, N.A., as syndication agent and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, as sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner, and the other financial institutions party thereto, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of ConAgra Foods' Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 27, 2012
10.2810.30 
10.30.1
10.30.2
10.30.3
10.31


**10.32
10.33
10.33.1
10.34
10.34.1
   
12 
   
21 
   
23 
   
24 
   
31.1 
   
31.2 
   
32.132 
   
101 
The following materials from ConAgra Foods'Conagra Brands' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2015,27, 2018, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Common Stockholders' Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and (vii) document and entity information.
   
  * Schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. ConAgra FoodsConagra Brands agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission a copy of any omitted schedule upon request.
   
  ** Management contract or compensatory plan.
   
  
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4) of Regulation S-K, certain instruments with respect to ConAgra Foods'Conagra Brands' long-term debt are not filed with this Form 10-K. ConAgra FoodsConagra Brands will furnish a copy of any such long-term debt agreement to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.




SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Conagra Brands, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CONAGRA BRANDS, INC.
By:/s/ SEAN M. CONNOLLY
Sean M. Connolly
President and Chief Executive Officer
July 20, 2018
By:/s/ DAVID S. MARBERGER
David S. Marberger
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
July 20, 2018
By:/s/  ROBERT G. WISE
Robert G. Wise
Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller
July 20, 2018

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 20th day of July, 2018.
Sean M. Connolly*Director
Bradley A. Alford*Director
Anil Arora*Director
Thomas K. Brown*Director
Stephen G. Butler*Director
Thomas W. Dickson*Director
Steven F. Goldstone*Director
Joie A. Gregor*Director
Rajive Johri*Director
Richard H. Lenny*Director
Ruth Ann Marshall*Director
Craig P. Omtvedt*Director
*     David S. Marberger, by signing his name hereto, signs this annual report on Form 10-K on behalf of each person indicated. Powers-of-Attorney authorizing David S. Marberger to sign this annual report on Form 10-K on behalf of each of the indicated Directors of Conagra Brands, Inc. have been filed herewith as Exhibit 24.

By:/s/  DAVID S. MARBERGER
David S. Marberger
Attorney-In-Fact















104111