UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
| | |
ý☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | For the fiscal year ended | December 31, 20172019 |
or
|
| |
¨☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number 001-05647
MATTEL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
| Delaware | | 95-1567322 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
333 Continental Blvd.
El Segundo, CA90245-5012
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (310) (310) 252-2000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | | | |
| Title of each class | | Trading Symbol(s) | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock,stock, $1.00 par valueper share | | MAT | | The Nasdaq Global Select Market |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yesý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whetherif the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨Noý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationsRegulation S-T(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yesý No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment of this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | | | |
| Large accelerated filer | | ý | | Accelerated filer | | ¨ |
| | | | |
| Non-accelerated filer | | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company | | ¨☐ |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | Emerging growth company | | ¨☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Ex-changeExchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨☐ No ý☒
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $7,402,057,060$5,044,446 based upon the closing market price as of the close of business June 30, 2017,2019, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
Number of shares outstanding of registrant’s common stock, $1.00 par value, as of February 16, 2018:7, 2020: 346,870,826 shares
343,923,058 shares
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Mattel, Inc. 20182020 Proxy Statement, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) within 120 days after the closeclosing of the registrant’sregistrant's fiscal year (incorporated into Part III)III to the extent stated herein).
MATTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
| | |
| | | Page |
| | PART I | |
| Item 1. | | |
| Item 1A. | | |
| Item 1B. | | |
| Item 2. | | |
| Item 3. | | |
| Item 4. | | |
| | PART II | |
| Item 5. | | |
Item 6. | | |
| Item 6. | | |
| Item 7. | | |
| Item 7A. | | |
| Item 8. | | |
| Item 9. | | |
| Item 9A. | | |
| Item 9B. | | |
| | PART III | |
| Item 10. | | |
| Item 11. | | |
| Item 12. | | |
| Item 13. | | |
| Item 14. | | |
| | PART IV | |
| Item 15. | | |
| Item 16. | | |
| | | |
(Cautionary Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995)
Mattel is including this Cautionary Statement to make applicablecaution investors and take advantage ofqualify for the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Act") for forward-looking statements. This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Act. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They often includeThe use of words such as "believes,"anticipates," "expects," "anticipates," "estimates," "intends," "plans," "seeks,"confident that" and "believes," "aims," "estimates," "projects," "on track," or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs, such as "will," "should," "could," or "may." Aamong others, generally identify forward-looking statement is neither a prediction nor a guarantee of future events or circumstances, and those future events or circumstances may not occur. Investors should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.statements. These forward-looking statements are all based on currently available operating, financial, economic and competitiveother information, and are subject to variousa number of significant risks and uncertainties. Mattel’sA variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control, could cause actual future results and trends mayto differ materially dependingfrom those projected in the forward-looking statements. Specific factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to: (i) Mattel’s ability to design, develop, produce, manufacture, source and ship products on a varietytimely and cost-effective basis, as well as interest in and purchase of those products by retail customers and consumers in quantities and at prices that will be sufficient to profitably recover Mattel’s costs; (ii) downturns in economic conditions affecting Mattel’s markets which can negatively impact retail customers and consumers, and which can result in lower employment levels, lower consumer disposable income and spending, including lower spending on purchases of Mattel’s products; (iii) other factors which can lower discretionary consumer spending, such as higher costs for fuel and food, drops in the value of homes or other consumer assets, and high levels of consumer debt; (iv) potential difficulties or delays Mattel may experience in implementing cost savings and efficiency enhancing initiatives; (v) other economic and public health conditions or regulatory changes in the markets in which Mattel and its customers and suppliers operate, which could create delays or increase Mattel’s costs, such as higher commodity prices, labor costs or transportation costs, or outbreaks of disease; (vi) currency fluctuations, including but not limitedmovements in foreign exchange rates, which can lower Mattel’s net revenues and earnings, and significantly impact Mattel’s costs; (vii) the concentration of Mattel’s customers, potentially increasing the negative impact to Mattel of difficulties experienced by any of Mattel’s customers, such as the bankruptcy and liquidation of Toys "R" Us, Inc., or changes in their purchasing or selling patterns; (viii) the future willingness of licensors of entertainment properties for which Mattel currently has licenses or would seek to have licenses in the future to license those products to Mattel; (ix) the inventory policies of Mattel’s retail customers, including retailers’ potential decisions to lower their inventories, even if it results in lost sales, as well as the concentration of Mattel’s revenues in the second half of the year, which coupled with reliance by retailers on quick response inventory management techniques increases the risk of underproduction of popular items, overproduction of less popular items and failure to achieve compressed shipping schedules; (x) the increased costs of developing more sophisticated digital and smart technology products, and the corresponding supply chain and design challenges associated with such products; (xi) work disruptions, which may impact Mattel’s ability to manufacture or deliver product in a timely and cost-effective manner; (xii) the bankruptcy and liquidation of Mattel’s significant retailers, such as Toys "R" Us, Inc. or the general lack of success of one of Mattel’s significant retailers which could negatively impact Mattel’s revenues or bad debt exposure; (xiii) the impact of competition on revenues, margins and other aspects of Mattel’s business, including the ability to offer products which consumers choose to buy instead of competitive products, the ability to secure, maintain and renew popular licenses and the ability to attract and retain talented employees; (xiv) the risk of product recalls or product liability suits and costs associated with product safety regulations; (xv) changes in laws or regulations in the United States and/or in other major markets, such as China, in which Mattel operates, including, without limitation, with respect to taxes, tariffs, trade policies, or product safety, which may increase Mattel’s product costs and other costs of doing business, and reduce Mattel’s earnings, (xvi) failure to realize the planned benefits from any investments or acquisitions made by Mattel, (xvii) the impact of other market conditions, third party actions or approvals and competition which could reduce demand for Mattel’s products or delay or increase the cost of implementation of Mattel’s programs or alter Mattel’s actions and reduce actual results; (xviii) changes in financing markets or the inability of Mattel to obtain financing on attractive terms (xix) the impact of litigation, arbitration, or regulatory decisions or settlement actions; (xx) uncertainty from the expected discontinuance of LIBOR and transition to any other interest rate benchmark; (xxi) an inability to remediate the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting or additional material weaknesses or other deficiencies in the future or the failure to maintain an effective system of internal controls; and (xxii) other risks and uncertainties discussed below.detailed in Part 1, Item 1A "Risk Factors." Mattel does not update forward-looking statements and expressly disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whetherdo so, except as a result of new developments or otherwise.required by law.
PART I
Throughout this report "Mattel" refers to Mattel, Inc. and/or one or more of its family of companies. Mattel designs, manufactures,is a leading global children's entertainment company that specializes in the design and markets a broad varietyproduction of quality toys and consumer products. Mattel's products are among the most widely recognized toy products worldwide which are sold to its customers and directly to consumers.in the world. Mattel's visionmission is to "inspire the wonder of childhood as the global leader in learning"create innovative products and developmentexperiences that inspire, entertain, and develop children through play." In order to deliver on this vision,mission, Mattel is focused on the following five-pillar strategy:two-part strategy to transform Mattel from a toy manufacturing company into an intellectual property ("IP") driven, high-performing toy company:
| |
| • | In the short- to mid-term, restore profitability by reshaping operations and regain topline growth by growing Mattel's Power Brands (Barbie, Hot Wheels, Fisher-Price and Thomas & Friends,and American Girl) and expanding Mattel's brand portfolio. |
BuildIn the mid- to long-term, capture the full value of Mattel's Power Brands (American Girl, Barbie, Fisher-Price, Hot Wheels, and Thomas & Friends) into connected 360-degree play systemsIP through franchise management and experiences;
Accelerate emerging markets growth with digital-first solutions;
Focusthe development of Mattel's online retail and strengthen Mattel's innovation pipeline;
Reshape Mattel's operations to enable this strategy - leaner, faster, and smarter - via commercial realignment, supply chain transformation, and IT transformation; and
Reignite Mattel's culture and team.e-commerce capabilities.
Mattel is the owner of a portfolio of global brands with vast intellectual property potential. Mattel's products are among the most widely recognized toy products in the world. Mattel's portfolio of owned and licensed brands and products are groupedorganized into four major brandthe following categories:
Mattel Girls & Boys BrandsDolls—including brands such as Barbie fashion,American Girl, Enchantimals, and Polly Pocket.Empowering girls since 1959, Barbie has inspired the limitless potential of every girl by showing them that they can be anything. With an extensive portfolio of dolls and accessories, ("Barbie"), Monster High, DC Super Hero Girls, Enchantimals,content, gaming, and Polly Pocket (collectively "Other Girls"), Hot Wheelslifestyle products, Barbie is the premier fashion doll for children around the world. American Girl is best known for imparting valuable life lessons through its inspiring dolls and Matchbox vehiclesbooks, featuring diverse characters from past and play sets (collectively "Wheels"), and CARS,DC Comics, WWEWrestling, Minecraft, Toy Story, and games and puzzles (collectively "Entertainment").
Fisher-Price Brands—including Fisher-Price, Little People, BabyGear, Laugh & Learn, and Imaginext (collectively "Core Fisher-Price"), Thomas & Friends, Shimmer and Shine, and Mickey Mouse Clubhouse (collectively "Fisher-Price Friends"), and Power Wheels.
American Girl Brands—including Truly Me, Girl of the Year, BeForever, Bitty Baby, and WellieWishers. American Girl Brandspresent. Its products are sold directly to consumers via its catalog, website, and proprietary retail stores,stores.
Infant, Toddler, and Preschool—including brands such as wellFisher-Price and Thomas & Friends, Power Wheels, Fireman Sam, and Shimmer and Shine (Nickelodeon). As a leader in play and child development, Fisher-Price’s mission is to provide meaningful solutions for parents and enrich children’s lives from birth to school readiness, helping families get the best possible start. Thomas & Friends is an award-winning preschool train brand franchise that brings meaningful life lessons of friendship and teamwork to kids through content, toys, live events, and other lifestyle categories.
Vehicles—including brands such as sold directlyHot Wheels, Matchbox, CARS (Disney Pixar), and Jurassic World (NBCUniversal).In production for over 50 years, Hot Wheels continues to certain retailers inpush the U.S.limits of performance and internationally.design and ignites the challenger spirit of kids, adults, and collectors. From diecast cars, to tracks, playsets, and advanced play products, the Hot Wheels portfolio has broad appeal that engages and excites kids.
ConstructionAction Figures, Building Sets, and Arts & Crafts BrandsGames—including brands such as MEGA, UNO, Toy Story (Disney Pixar), Jurassic World (NBCUniversal),and WWE.From big blocks to small bricks, first builders to advanced collectors, MEGA BLOKScreates products that spark purposeful play and RoseArt.encourage kids and adults to "build beyond." America's number one game, UNO is the classic matching card game that is easy to pick up and fast fun for everyone.
Mattel, Inc. was incorporated in California in 1948 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1968. Its executive offices are located at 333 Continental Blvd., El Segundo, California 90245-5012, telephone number (310) 252-2000.
Business Segments
Mattel’sMattel's operating segments are separately managed business units, consisting of:are: (i) North America, which consists of the U.S. and Canada,Canada; (ii) International,International; and (iii) American Girl. The North America and International segments sell products in the Mattel Girls & Boys Brands, Fisher-Price Brands, and Construction and Arts & Crafts Brandsacross categories, although some products are developed and adapted for particular international markets.
For additional information on Mattel’s segment reporting, including revenues by segment, segment income, and worldwide revenues by brand category, see Part II, Item 7 "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations" and Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Segment Information." For additional information regarding segment assets and geographic areas, see Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 1213 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Segment Information."
For a discussion of the risks inherent in the foreign operations of Mattel, which affect each segment, see Item 1A "Risk Factors."
North America Segment
The North America segment markets and sells toys in the U.S. and Canada from the Mattel Girls & Boys Brands, Fisher-Price Brands, and Construction and Arts & Crafts Brandsacross categories.
In the Dolls category, Mattel Girls & Boys Brands category, will seek to continue the strong momentum started by the 60th anniversary of Barbie includes in 2020. In spring 2020, Barbie fashion dollswill celebrate wellness with a new product launch and accessories. Other Girls includes Monster High, DC Super Hero Girls, Enchantimals,a 360-degree program centered around meditation and Polly Pocket. Wheels includes Hot Wheelsmindfulness including consumer products, digital activations, and Matchbox vehicles and play sets. Entertainment includes key licensing partnerships with Disney, Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., NBCUniversal Media, LLC, and WWE, as well as owned brands and products, including games and puzzles.
collaborations. Barbie continues to evolve the " will also kick off its inaugural You Can Be Anything"Anything Festival, benefiting the Dream Gap Project Fund with key talent timed to International Women’s Day. Barbie will continue a full year of the new Color Reveal segment, a new and innovative play pattern. In summer and fall 2020, Barbie will launch its sports campaign by highlighting role models throughout 2018. New product lines include cooking and bakingtied to the Olympics and a creative fashion play in partnership with Crayola. new We Are Barbie campaign focusing on the message of diversity and inclusivity. Barbie products will also continue to feature technology and connectivity and will be supported by new animated content, including Barbie Dreamtopia and new episodes of Barbie: Dreamhouse Adventures,a new Barbie Princess Adventures Special.
In 2018, Hot Wheels will introduce a larger systemBuilding off of play with the introduction of Hot Wheels City, and kids can connect everything in the Hot Wheels system of play with track builder, city, and boosted playsets. Hot Wheels Advanced Play, a segment for older children, will introduce Augmoto, an augmented reality racing game that will allow children to experience what it is like to be in the race.
Mattel’s Toy Boxits content distribution, Mattel will continue to focussupport Polly Pocket and Enchantimals by streaming animated content on bringingkey broadcast platforms globally. Both brands will have a strong new product line and will continue to be amplified by new content in 2020.
In 2020, Fisher-Price will celebrate its 90th birthday. Further development on the new brand platform launched in the fall of 2019 will look to turn brand awareness into brand love by surprising and delighting consumers as a trusted brand for infants and children up to five years old.
Thomas & Friends will celebrate a milestone 75th anniversary in 2020. Thomas has delighted fans for generations through books and television, and in 2020, Mattel is introducing more storytelling touchpoints than ever before for the next generation of fans. New series on YouTube, new audio stories, new music, and exciting partnerships in key markets around the world will celebrate Thomas & Friends throughout the year.
In the Vehicles category, industry leader Hot Wheels will continue its strong momentum as a multigenerational franchise with globally expanded Hot Wheels Legends and Hot Wheels Monster Trucks Live tours, and always-on premium content on YouTube. The core product offering will be refreshed with the new Track Builder Unlimited line and exciting partnerships with some of the best automotive and entertainment properties, including Fast & Furious 9 from NBCUniversal. Mattel will also continue to partner with Disney Pixar for CARS, with increased franchise support. Additionally, Matchbox is poised to have a great year, enhanced by its partnership with Viacom as global toy partner for Top Gun: Maverick.
Mattel’s Action Figures category will continue to collaborate with key licensor partners, such as Disney, NBCUniversal, WWE, and Microsoft, to bring innovative products to the global marketplace with speed and innovation. Toy Box will continue to partner with leading entertainment companies such as Disney, Warner Bros., Nickelodeon, NBCUniversal, and WWE.marketplace. Key 2020 product lines based on entertainment franchises include Minions, with a theatrical release in July 2020, support for 2018 include NBCUniversal's the launch of the Minecraft Earth video game, as well as continued franchise support of NBCUniversal’s Jurassic World, and Disney Pixar's CARS 3Toy Story 4 and other Disney Pixar properties.
MEGA is the global challenger brand in the building sets category, providing innovative building play experiences, authentic details and accessible value for fans and families. In 2020, MEGA will invite consumers of all ages to build more together, promoting inclusivity within the industry and the world. Parents of preschoolers can discover the new MEGA BloksPeek-a-Bloks segment, featuring easy building playsets and collectible peek-a-boo surprise characters. The MEGA Construx portfolio will introduce open-ended StoryBuilders sets to transition builders ages four to six to big kid building. Fans of partner franchises can continue to build and collect with Pokemon, Warner Bros.'s Justice League, BatmanGame of Thrones, and Aquaman,Halo.
In the Games category in 2020, Mattel’s flagship card game UNO will be introducing new innovative ways to play as well as continuing to introduce a variety of pop culture and Nickelodeon's Sunny Day.
Mattel will also focus on bringing new and revitalized brands to market including Enchantimals, MECARD, and Polly Pocket. Enchantimals will introduce an animated series, which will launchentertainment themed decks. With one of the largest branded portfolios in the fall, and will feature animated shorts, live action, toy centric content, and new character dolls. Mattel will introduce the new action battling game MECARD, that will allow children to battle, play, and collect their favorite MECARD characters and vehicles. Polly Pocket is returning in 2017 and will introduce a new generation of girls to the redesigned world, of Polly.
The Fisher-Price Brands category includes Fisher-PriceBabyGear, Laugh & Learn, Little People, Think & Learn, Imaginext, Thomas & Friends, Dora & Friends, Blaze and The Monster Machines, Sunny Day, Shimmer and Shine, Mickey Mouse Clubhouse, Minnie Mouse, Octonauts, and Power Wheels.
In 2018, Fisher-Price will continue its Best Possible Start campaign by supporting parents’ wishes to let their kids be kids and follow their own interests while celebrating the early childhood milestones and moments. Fisher-Price will introduce toys that encourage children to build the skills they need for school and life through play, including Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Math ("STEM" or "STEAM"), emotional intelligence, critical thinking, imagination, and more. Thomas & Friends will invite kids and parents to get All Aboard To Discovery and introduce a new slate of characters in new animated content with the fall release of the tentpole Thomas & Friends: Big World! Big Adventures! The Movie and Series 22. The content will feature a new Steam Team, including three female engines from various parts of the world that will help kids learn about other cultures.
The Construction and Arts & Crafts Brands category includes MEGA BLOKS and RoseArt brands.
In 2018, MEGAwe will continue to expand its line of building sets with both MEGA BLOKS for First Builders and highly detailed MEGA Construx. In the First Builders line, MEGA BLOKS will be launching the portable Build'n Go Case in the spring, which will allow parents and preschoolers to expand their MEGA BLOKSBig Building Bag system of play, and introduce a new Shape-Sorting Wagonmaximize evergreen brands like Pictionary, Musical Learning TrainRock 'Em Sock 'Em Robots, and a refreshed Racing Rig in the fall, each designedMagic 8 Ball and bring new innovative concepts to offer hours of family moments while developing early learning skills for builders aged 1-4. In the MEGA Construx line, fans can build, play, and collect highly-detailed, buildable micro-figures and construction sets for many popular franchises, including Pokemon, Halo, Call of Duty, Destiny, American Girl, and Probuilder.market.
International Segment
Products marketed by the International segment are generally the same as those developed and marketed by the North America segment, although some are developed or adapted for particular international markets. Mattel’s products are sold directly to retailers and wholesalers in most European, Latin American, and Asian countries, and in Australia and New Zealand, and through agents and distributors in those countries where Mattel has no direct presence.
Within the International segment, Mattel operates in three regional groups that generated the following gross sales during 2017:
|
| | | | | | |
| | Amount (a) | | Percentage of International Gross Sales |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Europe | $ | 1,281.7 |
| | 51 | % |
| Latin America | 675.3 |
| | 27 | % |
| Asia Pacific | 546.6 |
| | 22 | % |
| | $ | 2,503.5 |
| | 100 | % |
(a) Amounts may not foot due to rounding.
No individual country within the International segment exceeded 7% of worldwide consolidated gross sales during 2017.2019.
The strength of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies can significantly affect the revenues and profitability of Mattel’s international operations. Mattel enters into foreign currency forward exchange contracts, primarily to hedge its purchase and sale of inventory and other intercompany transactions denominated in foreign currencies, to limit the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on its results of operations and cash flows. See Part II, Item 7A "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" and Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Derivative Instruments." For financial information by geographic area, see Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Segment Information."
American Girl Segment
The American Girl segment is a direct marketer, children’s publisher, and retailer dedicated to its mission to help build girls of strong character. American Girl is best known for its line of historical and contemporary characters that feature 18" dolls, books, and accessories as well as the that inspire girls with important lessons from America’s past to today. For girls who are ready to tell their own stories, Truly Me, Girl of the Year, allows girls to express what’s on their minds and in their hearts by choosing a doll—or creating their own—from more than 1.3 million possibilities. Bitty Baby introduces girls to nurturing play until they are ready for WellieWishers, a sweet group of girls who teach about empathy and WellieWishers brands. being a good friend. American Girl also publishes best-selling fiction and non-fiction titles plusthat help girls navigate the award-winning American Girl magazine.changes and challenges of growing up. The American Girl segment sells products directly to consumers via its catalog, website, in its proprietary retail stores in the U.S., and at select retailers nationwide. Outside of the U.S., American Girl products are available innationwide, and at specialty boutiques at select Indigoand Chaptersfranchise stores in Canada, Dubai, and three franchiseBahrain. The American Girl stores with Majid Al Futtaim in the United Arab Emirates.Dubai and Bahrain are scheduled to close in early 2020.
In January 2018, 2020, American Girl introduced its first STEM-based newest Girl of the Yearcharacter, Luciana VegaJoss Kendrick, featuring all-new augmented reality experiencesa fierce athlete born with hearing loss and other interactive ways to play. Also in January 2018,a passion for surfing and competitive cheer. Throughout 2020, American Girl introduced new boy doll options in the contemporary Truly Me line, will focus on its mission to build girls of strong character through immersive storytelling; differentiated, premium experiences; and will feature even more diverse choices within the recently launched Create Your Own custom doll offering. Throughout 2018, American Girl will increase visibility of its exclusive content, including a new episodic character conceptour commitment to launch this fall.service and quality.
Manufacturing and Materials
Mattel manufactures toy products for all segments in both company-owned facilities and through third-party manufacturers. Products are also purchased from unrelated entities that design, develop, and manufacture those products. To provide greater flexibility in the manufacture and delivery of its products, and as part of a continuing effort to reduce manufacturing costs, Mattel has concentrated production of most of its core products in company-owned facilities and generally uses third-party manufacturers for the production of non-core products.
Mattel’s principal manufacturing facilities are located in Canada, China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, and Thailand. In conjunction with the Capital Light program, Mattel discontinued production in 2019 at certain plants located in China, Indonesia, and Mexico. In addition to the discontinued production at the three plants, Mattel announced that it will discontinue production in 2020 at its plant located in Canada. To help avoid disruption of its product supply due to political instability, civil unrest, economic instability, changes in government policies or regulations, natural and manmade disasters, and other risks, Mattel produces its products in multiple facilities across multiple countries. Mattel believes that the existing production capacity at its own and its third-party manufacturers’ facilities is sufficient to handle expected volume in the foreseeable future. Mattel continues to evaluate its manufacturing footprint in connection with its Capital Light program.
Mattel bases its production schedules for toy products on customer orders and forecasts, taking into account historical trends, results of market research, and current market information. Actual shipments of products ordered and order cancellation rates are affected by consumer acceptance of product lines, strength of competing products, marketing strategies of retailers, changes in buying patterns of both retailers and consumers, and overall economic conditions. Unexpected changes in these factors could result in a lack of product availability or excess inventory in a particular product line.
The majority of Mattel’s raw materials are available from numerous suppliers but may be subject to fluctuations in price. See Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors."
Competition and Industry Background
Mattel is a worldwide leader in the manufacture, marketing, and sale of toys, games, and other products related to play, learning, and development. Competition in the toy industry is based primarily on quality, play value, brands, and price. Mattel offers a diverse range of products for children of all ages and families that include, among others, toys for infants and preschoolers, girls’ toys, boys’dolls, vehicles, action figures, construction toys, youth electronics, hand-held and other games, puzzles, educational toys, technology-related products, media-driven products, and fashion-related toys. The North America segment competes with several large toy companies, including Funko, Hasbro, JakksJAKKS Pacific, Jazwares, Just Play Products, Lego,LEGO, MGA Entertainment, Moose Toys, Spin Master, and VTech, many smaller toy companies, and manufacturers of video games and consumer electronics. The International segment competes with global toy companies including Famosa, Giochi Preziosi,Funko, Hasbro, Lego,JAKKS Pacific, Just Play Products, LEGO, MGA Entertainment, Playmobil, Ravensburger, Simba, Spin Master, and VTech, other national and regional toy companies, and manufacturers of video games and consumer electronics. Foreign regions may include competitors that are strong in a particular toy line or geographical area but do not compete with Mattel or other international toy companies worldwide. The American Girl segment competes with companies that manufacture girls’ toysdolls and accessories and with children’s book publishers and retailers.
Competition among the above companies is intensifying due to trends towards shorter life cycles for individual toy products and an increasing use of highmore sophisticated technology in toys. In addition, asamong consumers. As a result of the phenomenon of "children getting older younger" resulting from children outgrowing toys at younger ages, Mattel competes with companies that sell non-toy products, outside the toy aisle, such as electronic consumer products, video games, as well as content and video games.other entertainment companies. Competition continues to be heavily influenced by the fact that a small number of retailers account for a large portion of all toy sales, allocate the shelf space from which toys are viewed, and have direct contact with parents and children through in-store purchases, coupons, and print advertisements.online purchases. Such retailers can and do promote their own private-label toys, facilitate the sale of competitors’ toys, showcase toys online based on proprietary algorithms, and allocate shelf space to one type of toy over another. Competition is also intensifying due to the availability of online-onlyOnline distributors including Amazon.com, which are able to promote a wide variety of toys and represent a wide variety of toy manufacturers, and, with limited overhead, do so at a lower cost.manufacturers.
Seasonality
Mattel’s business is highly seasonal, with consumers making a large percentage of all toy purchases during the traditional holiday season. A significant portion of Mattel’s customers’ purchasing occurs in the third and fourth quarters of Mattel’s fiscal year in anticipation of holiday buying. These seasonal purchasing patterns and requisite production lead times create risk to Mattel’s business associated with the underproduction of popular toys and the overproduction of less popular toys that do not match consumer demand. Retailers have also been attempting to manage their inventories more tightly in recent years, requiring Mattel to ship products closer to the time the retailers expect to sell the products to consumers. These factors increase the risk that Mattel may not be able to meet demand for certain products at peak demand times or that Mattel’s own inventory levels may be adversely impacted by the need to pre-build products before orders are placed. Additionally, as retailers manage their inventories, Mattel experiences cyclical ordering patterns for products and product lines that may cause its sales to vary significantly from period to period.
In anticipation of retail sales in the traditional holiday season, Mattel significantly increases its production in advance of the peak selling period, resulting in a corresponding build-up of inventory levels in the first three quarters of its fiscal year. Seasonal shipping patterns result in significant peaks in the third and fourth quarters in the respective levels of inventories and accounts receivable, which result in seasonal working capital financing requirements. See Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Seasonal Financing and Debt."
Product Design and Development
Through its product design and development group, Mattel regularly refreshes, redesigns, and extends existing toy product lines and develops innovative new toy product lines for all segments. Mattel believes its success is dependent on its ability to continue these activities effectively. See Item 1A "Risk Factors." Product design and development activities are principally conducted by a group of professional designers and engineers employed by Mattel. During 2017, 2016, and 2015, Mattel incurred expenses of $225.2 million, $215.3 million, and $217.8 million, respectively, in connection with the design and development of products, exclusive of royalty payments. See Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Supplemental Financial Information."
Additionally, independent toy designers and developers bring concepts and products to Mattel and are generally paid a royalty on the net selling price of products licensed to Mattel. These independent toy designers may also create different products for other toy companies.
Advertising and Marketing
Mattel supports its product lines with extensive advertising and consumer promotions. Advertising takes place at varying levels throughout the year and peaks during the traditional holiday season. Advertising includes television and radio commercials, social media, and magazine, newspaper, and internet advertisements, and social media.advertisements. Promotions include in-store displays, sweepstakes, merchandising materials, major events focusing on products, and tie-ins with various consumer products companies.
During 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015,2017, Mattel incurred advertising and promotion expenses of $551.5 million (12.2% of net sales), $524.3 million (11.6% of net sales), and $642.3 million (13.2% of net sales), $634.9 million (11.6% of net sales), and $717.9 million (12.6% of net sales), respectively, for advertising and promotion.respectively.
Sales
Mattel’s products are sold throughout the world. Products within the North America segment are sold directly to retailers, including discount and free-standing toy stores, chain stores, department stores, other retail outlets, and, to a limited extent, wholesalers. Mattel also operates several small retail outlets generally near or at itscertain corporate headquarters and distribution centersoffices as a service to its employees and as an outlet for its products. Products within the International segment are sold directly to retailers and wholesalers in most European, Latin American, and Asian countries, and in Australia and New Zealand, and through agents and distributors in those countries where Mattel has no direct presence. Mattel also has retail outlets in Latin America and Europe that serve as outlets for its products. American Girl products and its children's publications are sold directly to consumers and select retailers nationwide. Mattel has 20 American Girl retail stores: American Girl Placespace in Chicago, Illinois,Illinois; Los Angeles, California,California; and New York, New York and for its American Girl Placestores, and in Alpharetta, Georgia, Bloomington, Minnesota, Charlotte, North Carolina, Chesterfield, Missouri, Columbus, Ohio, Dallas, Texas, Houston, Texas, Lone Tree, Colorado, Lynnwood, Washington, McLean, Virginia, Miami, Florida, Nashville, Tennessee, Natick, Massachusetts, Orlando, Florida, Overland Park, Kansas, Palo Alto, California, and Scottsdale, Arizona,over 10 other cities across the United States for its American Girl stores, each of which features children’s products from the American Girl segment. Additionally, Mattel sells certain of its products online through websites of one or more of its subsidiaries.
During 2017,2019 and 2018, Mattel’s threetwo largest customers (Wal-Mart(Walmart at $1.0 billion, Toys "R" Us at $0.4$1.01 billion and Target at $0.4 billion)$0.44 billion during 2019, Walmart at $1.07 billion and Target at $0.45 billion during 2018) accounted for approximately 37%32% and 34%, respectively, of worldwide consolidated net sales. As a result of Toys "R" Us filing for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in September 2017, Mattel reversed approximately $43 million of net sales attributable to the North America segment in the third quarter of 2017. Mattel reduced shipping to Toys "R" Us in early September, which resulted in a loss of revenue in the second half of 2017. In January 2018, Toys "R" Us submitted a court filing with a plan to close over 160 stores, subject to court approval. Mattel expects this Chapter 11 proceeding to impact its recurring revenue from Toys "R" Us and if Toys "R" Us were unsuccessful with their Chapter 11 reorganization, it could lead to potential adverse effects on Mattel’s business, financial condition and results of operations, including its ability to collect its trade receivables.
Within countries in the International segment, there is also a concentration of sales to certain large customers that do not operate in the U.S., none of which exceedexceeded 10% of worldwide consolidated net sales. The customers and the degree of concentration vary depending upon the region or nation. See Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors" and Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 1213 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Segment Information."
Licenses and Distribution Agreements
Mattel has license agreements with third parties that permit Mattel to utilize the trademark, characters, or inventions of the licensor in products that Mattel sells. A number of these licenses relate to product lines that are significant to Mattel’s business and operations.
Mattel has entered into agreements to license entertainment properties from, among others, Disney Enterprises, Inc. (including Disney characters such as Star Wars, Mickey Mouse, Jake Pixar (including CARS and the Never Land Pirates, CARS 3 and Toy Story from Pixar, Story) and certain other Disney films and television properties), NBCUniversal (including the Fast &and Furious and Jurassic World franchises)), Viacom International, Inc. relating to its Nickelodeon properties (including Dora the Explorer, Blaze and the Monster Machines, SpongeBob SquarePants, and Sunny Day, Shimmer and Shine,and Butterbean's Cafe), Warner Bros. Consumer Products (including Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman, Justice League, and DC Super HeroComics Superhero Girls), Microsoft (including Halo), Mojang (including andMinecraft), and WWEWrestling..
Mattel's license with Warner Bros. Consumer Products for the global rights to produce and sell action figures based on DC Comics characters expires in March 2020 and will not be renewed.
Royalty expense for 2019, 2018, and 2017 2016, and 2015 was $244.5$220.2 million, $228.9$224.0 million, and $264.6$244.5 million, respectively. See "Commitments" and Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 1112 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Commitments and Contingencies."
Mattel’s license agreement with Disney Enterprises, Inc. for the global rights to produce and sell toys based on Disney Princess characters expired at the end of 2015 and was not renewed. Gross sales of Disney Princess products were $455.6 million in 2015. However, Mattel's license of CARS 3 (released in 2017) and Toy Story 4 (expected release in 2019) were renewed in 2016.
Mattel also licenses a number of its trademarks and other property rights to others for use in connection with the sale of their products. Mattel distributes some third-party finished products that are independently designed and manufactured.
Trademarks, Copyrights, and Patents
Most of Mattel’s products are sold under trademarks, trade names, and copyrights, and some of these products incorporate devices or designs for which patent protection has been, or is being pursued. Trademarks, copyrights, and patents are significant assets of Mattel in that they provide product recognition and acceptance worldwide.
Mattel customarily seeks trademark, copyright, and/or patent protection covering its products, and it owns or has applications pending or registrations for U.S. and foreign trademarks, copyrights, and patents covering many of its products. Although a number of these trademarks, copyrights, and patents relate to product lines that are significant to Mattel’s business and operations, Mattel does not believe it is dependent on a single trademark, copyright, or patent. Mattel believes its rights to these properties are adequately protected, but there can be no assurance that its rights can be successfully asserted in the future or will not be invalidated, circumvented, or challenged.
Commitments
In the normal course of business, Mattel enters into contractual arrangements for future purchases of goods and services to ensure availability and timely delivery and to obtain and protect Mattel’s right to create and market certain products. Certain of these commitments routinely contain provisions for guarantees or minimum expenditures during the term of the contracts. Current and future commitments for guaranteed payments reflect Mattel’s focus on expanding its product lines through alliances with businesses in other industries. Additionally, Mattel routinely enters into noncancelable lease agreements for premises and equipment used in the normal course of business.
Agreements to purchase inventory, services, and other items with terms extending through 2022 contain future minimum payments totaling approximately $359$342 million. Licensing and similar agreements with terms extending through 2022 and beyond2024 contain provisions for future guaranteed minimum payments totaling approximately $322$184 million. Operating leaseLease commitments with terms extending through 20222024 and beyond contain future minimum obligations totaling approximately $581$450 million. See Part II, Item 7 "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Commitments", Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Commitments and Contingencies" and Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 117 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Commitments and Contingencies.Leases."
Backlog
Mattel ships products in accordance with delivery schedules specified by its customers, which usually request delivery within three months. In the toy industry, orders are subject to cancellation or change at any time prior to shipment. In recent years, a trend towardMany of Mattel's customers use quick response or just-in-time inventory management practices in the toy industry has resultedresulting in fewer advance orders and therefore less backlog of orders. Mattel believes that the amount of backlog orders at any given time may not accurately indicate future sales.
Financial Instruments
Currency exchange rate fluctuations may impact Mattel’s results of operations and cash flows. Mattel seeks to mitigate its exposure to foreign exchange risk by monitoring its foreign currency transaction exposure for the year and partially hedging such exposure using foreign currency forward exchange contracts primarily to hedge its purchase and sale of inventory and other intercompany transactions denominated in foreign currencies. These contracts generally have maturity dates of up to 18 months. In addition, Mattel manages its exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations through the selection of currencies used for international borrowings. Mattel does not trade in financial instruments for speculative purposes.
For additional information regarding foreign currency contracts, see "International Segment" above, Part II, Item 7A "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,"Risk" and Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 910 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Derivative Instruments."
Seasonal Financing
See Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Seasonal Financing and Debt."
Government Regulations and Environmental Quality
Mattel’s products sold in the U.S. are subject to the provisions of the Consumer Product Safety Act, as amended by the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, the Federal Hazardous Substances Act, and the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, and may also be subject to the requirements of the Flammable Fabrics Act or the Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act and the regulations promulgated pursuant to such statutes. These statutes and the related regulations ban from the market consumer products that fail to comply with applicable product safety laws, regulations, and standards. The Consumer Product Safety Commission may require the recall, repurchase, replacement, or repair of any such banned products or products that otherwise create a substantial risk of injury and may seek penalties for regulatory noncompliance under certain circumstances. Similar laws exist in some U.S. states. Mattel believes that it is in substantial compliance with these federal and state laws and regulations.
Mattel’s products sold worldwide are subject to the provisions of similar laws and regulations in many jurisdictions, including the European Union ("EU") and Canada. Mattel believes that it is in substantial compliance with these laws and regulations.
Mattel maintains a quality control program to help ensure compliance with applicable product safety requirements. Nonetheless, Mattel has experienced, and may in the future experience, issues in products that result in recalls, withdrawals, or replacements of products. A product recall could have a material adverse effect on Mattel’s results of operations and financial condition, depending on the product affected by the recall and the extent of the recall efforts required. A product recall could also negatively affect Mattel’s reputation and the sales of other Mattel products. See Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors."
Mattel’s advertising is subject to the Federal Trade Commission Act, The Children’s Television Act of 1990, the rules and regulations promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission, and the Federal Communications Commission, as well as laws of certain countries that regulate advertising and advertising to children. In addition, Mattel’s web-based products and services and other online and digital communications activity are or may be subject to U.S. and foreign privacy-related regulations, including the U.S. Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 and the EU General Data Protection Directive (Directive 95/46/EC)Regulation and related national regulations. SimilarPrivacy-related laws also exist in some U.S. states.states, including the recently enacted California Consumer Protection Act. Mattel believes that it is in substantial compliance with these laws and regulations.
Mattel’s worldwide operations are subject to the requirements of various environmental laws and regulations in the jurisdictions where those operations are located. Mattel believes that it is in substantial compliance with those laws and regulations. Mattel’s operations are from time to time the subject of investigations, conferences, discussions, and negotiations with various federal, state, and local environmental agencies within and outside the U.S. with respect to the discharge or cleanup of hazardous waste. Mattel is not aware of any material cleanup liabilities.
Mattel is subject to various other federal, state, local, and international laws and regulations applicable to its business. Mattel believes that it is in substantial compliance with these laws and regulations.
Employees
The total number of persons employed by Mattel and its subsidiaries at any one time varies because of the seasonal nature of its manufacturing operations. As of December 31, 2017,2019, Mattel’s total number of employees (excluding temporary and seasonal employees) was approximately 28,000.
Research and Development
See "Design and Development" in Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Supplemental Financial Information."
24,000.
Available Information
Mattel files its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Proxy Statements, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") with the SEC. The public may read and copy any materials that Mattel files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet website that contains reports, proxy, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
Mattel’s Internetinternet website address is http://corporate.mattel.com. Mattel makes available on its Internetinternet website, free of charge, its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Proxy Statements, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.
If any of the risks and uncertainties described in the cautionary risk factors listed below actually occurs, Mattel’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be significantlyadversely affected, and adversely affected.such effects could at times be significant. The risk factors listed below are not exhaustive. Other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K include additional factors that could materially and adversely impact Mattel’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, Mattel operates in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict the impact of all of these factors on Mattel’s business, financial condition, or results of operations, or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not rely on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. Any or all of the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and any other public statement made by Mattel or its representatives may turn out to be wrong. Mattel expressly disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new developments or otherwise.
If Mattel doesis not always able to successfully identify and/or satisfy consumer preferences, which could cause its business, financial condition, and results of operations mayto be adversely affected.
Mattel’s business and operating results depend largely upon the appeal of its products, driven by both innovation and marketing. Consumer preferences, particularly with children as the end users of Mattel’s products, are continuously changing. Mattel is not always able to identify trends in consumer preferences or identify and satisfy consumer preferences in a timely manner. Significant, sudden shifts in demand are caused by "hit" toys and trends, which are often unpredictable. Mattel offers a diverse range of products for children of all ages and families that includes, among others, toys for infants and preschoolers, girls’ toys,and boys’ toys, youth electronics, digital media, hand-held and other games, puzzles, educational toys, media-driven products, and fashion-related toys. Mattel competes domestically and internationally with a wide range of large and small manufacturers, marketers and sellers of toys, video games, consumer electronics such as tablets and mobile devices, and other play products, as well as retailers, which means that Mattel’s market position is always at risk. Mattel’s ability to maintain its current product sales, and increase its product sales or establish product sales with new, innovative toys, will dependdepends on Mattel’s ability to satisfy play preferences, enhance existing products, develop and introduce new products, and achieve market acceptance of these products. These challenges are intensifying due to trends towards shorter life cycles for individual toy products, the phenomenon of children outgrowing traditional toys at younger ages, an increasing use of more sophisticated technology in toys, and an evolving path to purchase. If Mattel does notMattel's failure to successfully meet the challenges outlined above in a timely and cost-effective manner could decrease demand for its products could decrease, and may adversely affect Mattel’s revenues, profitabilitybusiness, financial condition, and results of operations may be adversely affected.operations.
High levels of competition and low barriers to entry make it difficult to achieve, maintain, or build upon the success of Mattel’s brands, products, and product lines.
Mattel faces competitors who are also constantly monitoring and attempting to anticipate consumer tastes, seeking ideas which will appeal to consumers, and introducing new products that compete with Mattel’s products. In addition, competition for access to entertainment properties couldhas and may continue to lessen Mattel’s ability to secure, maintain, and renew popular licenses to entertainment products developed by other parties and licensed to Mattel, or require Mattel to pay licensors higher royalties and higher minimum guaranteed payments in order to obtain or retain these licenses. As a licensee of entertainment properties, Mattel has no guarantee that a particular property or brand will translate into a successful toy, game, or other product. In addition, the barriers to entry for new participants in the toy products industry are low. In a very short period of time, new market participants with a popular product idea or entertainment property can become a significant source of competition for Mattel and its products. IfReduced demand for Mattel’s brands, products and product lines is reduced as a result of these factors may adversely affect Mattel’s business, financial condition, and results of operations may be adversely affected.
operations.
Inaccurately anticipating changes and trends in popular culture, media and movies, fashion, or technology can negativelyadversely affect Mattel’s sales.sales, financial condition, and results of operations.
Successful movies and characters in children’s literature affect play preferences, and many products depend on media-based intellectual property licenses. Media-based licenses can cause a line of toys or other products to gain immediate success among children, parents, or families. Trends in media, movies, and children’s characters change swiftly and contribute to the transience and uncertainty of play preferences. In addition, certain developments in the entertainment industry, including labor strikes, could cause delaydelays or interruptioninterruptions in the release of new movies and television programs and could adversely affect the sales of Mattel’s products based on such movies and television programs. Mattel respondsattempts to respond to such trends and developments by modifying, refreshing, extending, and expanding its product offerings on an annual basis. IfAny inability by Mattel does notto accurately anticipate trends in popular culture, movies, media, fashion, or technology, may cause its products may not to be accepted by children, parents, or families and Mattel’s revenues, profitability,may adversely affect its sales, financial condition, and results of operations may be adversely affected.operations.
Mattel’s failure to successfully market or advertise its products could have an adverse effect on Mattel’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Mattel’s products are marketed worldwide through a diverse spectrum of advertising and promotional programs. Mattel’s ability to sell products is dependent in part upon the success of these programs. If Mattel does not successfully market its products or if media or other advertising or promotional costs increase, these factors could have an adverse effect on Mattel’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.operations could be adversely effected by its failure to successfully market its products or by an increase in its media or other advertising or promotional costs.
Mattel’s business is highly seasonal and its operating results depend, in large part, on sales during the relatively brief traditional holiday season. Any eventsEvents that disrupt Mattel’s business during its peak demand times could significantly,can adversely and disproportionately affect Mattel’s business.business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Mattel’s business is subject to risks associated with the underproduction of popular toys and the overproduction of toys that are less popular with consumers. Sales of toy products at retail are highly seasonal, with a majority of retail sales occurring during the period from September through December. In recent years, many consumers have delayed their purchases until just before the holidays. As a result, Mattel’s operating results depend, in large part, on sales during the relatively brief traditional holiday season. Retailers attempt to manage their inventories tightly, which requires Mattel to ship products closer to the time the retailers expect to sell the products to consumers. This in turn results in shorter lead times for production. Management believes that the recent increase in "last minute" shopping during the holiday season and the popularity of gift cards (which often shift purchases to after the holiday season) may negatively impact customer re-orders during the holiday season. These factors may decrease sales or increase the risks that Mattel may not be able to meet demand for certain products at peak demand times or that Mattel’s own inventory levels may be adversely impacted by the need to pre-build products before orders are placed.
In addition, as a result of the seasonal nature of Mattel’s business, Mattel may be significantly and adversely affected, in a manner disproportionate to the impact on a company with sales spread more evenly throughout the year, by unforeseen events, such as terrorist attacks, economic shocks, severe weather, earthquakes or other catastrophic events, that harm the retail environment or consumer buying patterns during its key selling season, or by events, such as strikes, disruptions in transportation, or port delays, that interfere with the manufacture or shipment of goods during the critical months leading up to the holiday purchasing season.
Mattel has significant customer concentration, so that economic difficulties or changes in the purchasing policies or patterns of its key customers could have a significant impactan adverse effect on Mattel’s business, financial condition, and operating results.results of operations.
A small number of customers account for a large share of Mattel’s worldwide consolidated net sales. In 2017,2019, Mattel’s threetwo largest customers, Wal-Mart, Toys "R" Us,Walmart and Target, in the aggregate, accounted for approximately 37%32% of net sales (Walmart at $1.01 billion and Target at $0.44 billion) and its ten largest customers, in the aggregate, accounted for approximately 47%49% of net sales. While the concentration of Mattel’s business with a relatively small number of customers may provide certain benefits to Mattel, such as potentially more efficient product distribution and decreased costs of sales and distribution, this concentration may exposeexposes Mattel to risk of a material adverse effect if one or more of Mattel’s large customers were to significantly reduce purchases for any reason, favor competitors or new entrants, or increase their direct competition with Mattel by expanding their private-label business. Customers make no binding long-term commitments to Mattel regarding purchase volumes and make all purchases by delivering one-time purchase orders. Any customer could reducereducing its overall purchases of Mattel’s products, reducereducing the number and variety of Mattel’s products that it carries and the shelf space allotted for Mattel’s products, or otherwise seekseeking to materially change the terms of the business relationship at any time. Any such changetime could significantly harmadversely affect Mattel’s business, financial condition, and operating results. Furthermore, the bankruptcy or other lackresults of success of one or more of Mattel's significant retail customers has, and in the future could negatively impact Mattel's revenues and profitability.
operations.
Liquidity problems or bankruptcy of Mattel’s key customers, includingsuch as the recent bankruptcy filing by Toys "R" Us, could have a significantan adverse effect on Mattel’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Mattel’s sales to customers are typically made on credit without collateral. There is a risk that key customers will not pay, or that payment may be delayed, because of bankruptcy, contraction of credit availability to such customers, weak retail sales, or other factors beyond the control of Mattel, which could increase Mattel’s exposure to losses from bad debts. In addition, ifwhen key customers were to cease doing business with Mattel as a result of bankruptcy, or significantly reduce the number of stores operated, it couldcan have a significantan adverse effect on Mattel’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
On September 18, 2017, Toys "R" Us accounting for 8% and 11% of Mattel’s net sales for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and certain of its affiliates filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division. Mattel expects thisThis Chapter 11 proceeding to impact itsand subsequent liquidation has negatively impacted Mattel’s recurring revenue from Toys "R" Us and if Toys "R" Us were unsuccessful with their Chapter 11 reorganization, it could lead to potential adverse effects on Mattel's business, financial condition and results of operations, including its ability to collect its trade receivables.Us.
To the extent Mattel may beis unable to realize the anticipated cost savings from its previously announced cost savings planprograms or may incurincurs additional and/or unexpected costs in order to realize them.such cost savings, Mattel's business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Mattel is implementinghas and continues to implement a series of cost savings initiativesprograms as described in Part II, Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Cost Savings Programs".Programs." Mattel expects to incur one-time, non-recurringincurred costs of $59.1 million and $109.8 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively, to achieve such cost savings, including certainand expects to incur additional costs during 2018 and 2019.2020. There can be no assurance that Mattel will be able to realize the anticipated cost savings from its previously announced cost savings planprograms in the amounts or within the anticipated timeframes or at all. In addition, any cost savings that Mattel realizes may be offset, in whole or in part, by reductions in net sales or through increases in other expenses. Failure to realize the expected cost savings from its proposedthese cost savings planprograms could have an adverse effect on Mattel’s business, financial condition, and results and prospects.of operations.
The amounts of anticipated cost savings and anticipated expenses related thereto are based on Mattel’s current estimates, but they involve risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors that may cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from those described herein. Assumptions relating to the plans and amounts related thereto involve subjective decisions and judgments with respect to, among other things, the estimated impact of certain operational adjustments, including marketing efficiency, labor management, material input cost fluctuations, plant transition costs, and other cost and savings adjustments, as well as future economic, competitive, industry and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are inherently uncertain and may be beyond the control of Mattel’s management. Although Mattel’s management believes these estimates and assumptions to be reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and there can be no assurance that the assumptions or estimates described herein will prove to be accurate or that the objectives and plans expressed will be achieved. Neither Mattel’s independent registered public accounting firm nor any other independent registered public accounting firm, has examined, compiled, or performed any procedures with respect to these amounts, nor have they expressed any opinion, or any other form of assurance, on such information or their achievability.
Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the anticipated cost savings will be realized or that the impact of the efforts to achieve such cost savings will not be significantly different than currently anticipated. Mattel undertakes no obligation to update or otherwise revise or reconcile its expectations regarding its cost savings efforts whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Failure to successfully implement new initiatives or meet product introduction schedules couldcan have a significantan adverse effect on Mattel’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Mattel has at times in the past announced, and in the future may announce, initiatives to reduce its costs, optimize its manufacturing footprint, increase its efficiency, improve the execution of its core business, globalize and extend Mattel’s brands, catch new trends, create new brands, and offer new innovative products and improve existing products, enhance product safety, develop people, improve productivity, simplify processes, maintain customer service levels, as well as initiatives designed to drive sales growth, capitalize on Mattel’s scale advantage, and improve its supply chain. These initiatives involve investment of capital and complex decision-making as well as extensive and intensive execution, and the success of these initiatives is not assured. In addition, Mattel may anticipate introducing a particular product, product line or brand at a certain time in the future. There is no guarantee that Mattel will be able to manufacture, source and ship new or continuing products in a timely manner and on a cost-effective basis. Unforeseen delays or difficulties in the development process or significant increases in the planned cost of development for new Mattel products may cause the introduction date for products to be later than anticipated or, in some situations, may cause a product or new product introduction to be discontinued. Failure to successfully implement any of these initiatives or launches, or the failure of any of these initiatives or launches to produce the results anticipated by management, could have a significantan adverse effect on Mattel’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Significant increases in the price of commodities, transportation, or labor, if not offset by declines in other input costs, or a reduction or interruption in the delivery of raw materials, components, and finished products from Mattel’s vendors could negatively impactadversely affect Mattel’s business, financial results.condition, and results of operations.
Cost increases, whether resulting from rising costs of materials, transportation, services, labor, or compliance with existing or future regulatory requirements, could impact the profit margins realized by Mattel on the sale of its products. Because of market conditions, timing of pricing decisions, and other factors, there can be no assurance that Mattel will be able to offset any of these increased costs by adjusting the prices of its products. Increases in prices of Mattel’s products may not be sustainable and could result in lower sales. Mattel’s ability to meet customer demand depends, in part, on its ability to obtain timely and adequate delivery of materials, parts, and components from its suppliers and internal manufacturing capacity. Mattel has experienced shortages in the past, including shortages of raw materials and components. Additionally, as Mattel cannot guarantee the stability of its major suppliers, major suppliers may stop manufacturing components at any time with little or no notice. If Mattel is required to use alternative sources, it may be required to redesign some aspects of the affected products, which may involve delays and additional expense. Although Mattel works closely with suppliers to avoid these types of shortages, there can be no assurance that Mattel will not encounter these problems in the future. A reductionReductions or interruptioninterruptions in supplies or in the delivery of finished products, whether resulting from more stringent regulatory requirements, disruptions in transportation, port delays, labor strikes, lockouts, an outbreak of a severe public health pandemic, severe weather, the occurrence or threat of wars or other conflicts, or a significant increase in the price of one or more supplies, such as fuel or resin (which is an oil-based product used in plastics), or otherwise, have at times in the past and could negatively impactin the future adversely affect Mattel’s business, financial results.condition, and results of operations.
Mattel’s substantial indebtedness could adversely affect its ability to raise additional capital to fund its operations, limit its ability to react to changes in the economy or its industry, and expose it to interest rate risk to the extent of its variable rate debt.
At December 31, 2017,2019, Mattel had approximately $3.12$2.85 billion of indebtedness on a consolidated basis, consisting primarily of the 6.75% Senior Notes due 2025 and 5.875% Senior Notes due 2027, as well as the Senior Notes issued in the prior years. In addition, Mattel has an additional $1.60 billion of unused commitments under its new senior secured revolving credit facilities, subject to borrowing base capacity. For more information, see Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Seasonal Financing and Debt".Debt."
Subject to the limits contained in the credit agreement that governs Mattel’s new senior secured revolving credit facilities, the indenture that governs the notes and Mattel’s other debt instruments, Mattel may incur substantial additional debt from time to time to finance working capital, capital expenditures, investments or acquisitions, or for other purposes. IfTo the extent Mattel does so, the risks related to Mattel’s high level of debt would increase. Specifically, Mattel’s substantial indebtedness could have important consequences. For example, it could:
Require Mattel to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to payments on Mattel’s indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of Mattel’s cash flow to fund acquisitions, working capital, capital expenditures, research and development efforts, and other general corporate purposes;
Increase Mattel’s vulnerability to and limit Mattel’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and the industries in which it operates;
Restrict Mattel from making strategic acquisitions or cause Mattel to make non-strategic divestitures;
Expose Mattel to the risk of increased interest rates as borrowings under its new senior secured revolving credit facilities will be subject to variable rates of interest;
Expose Mattel to additional risks related to currency exchange rates and repatriation of funds;
Place Mattel at a competitive disadvantage compared to its competitors that have less debt; and
Limit Mattel’s ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing for working capital, capital expenditures, business development, debt service requirements, acquisitions, and general corporate or other purposes.
Mattel’s credit ratings have declined in recent years and as a result, Mattel’s cost of issuing new debt has increased. Any further reduction in Mattel’s credit ratings could further increase the cost of issuing any such debt. Mattel may be hindered from obtaining, or required to incur additionalincremental costs to obtain, additional credit in tight credit markets. Additionally,Further, Mattel’s ability to issue additional debt could be adversely affected by additionalother factors, such asincluding market conditions.
In addition, the indenture governing the notes and the agreements governing Mattel’s new senior secured revolving credit facilities contain affirmative and negative covenants that limit Mattel’s ability to engage in activities that may be in its long-term best interests. Mattel’s failure to comply with those covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of all of Mattel’s debts.
To service Mattel’s indebtedness, Mattel will requirerequires a significant amount of cash and Mattel’s ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond Mattel’s control.
Mattel’s ability to make cash payments on and to refinance its indebtedness, and to fund planned capital expenditures, will dependdepends on Mattel’s ability to generate significant operating cash flow in the future. This, to a significant extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory, and other factors that are beyond Mattel’s control.
Mattel’s business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations and future borrowings may not be available under Mattel’s new senior secured revolving credit facilities in an amount sufficient to enable Mattel to pay its indebtedness or to fund its other liquidity needs. In such circumstances, Mattel may need to refinance all or a portion of its indebtedness upon or before maturity. Mattel may not be able to refinance any of Mattel’s indebtedness, including its new senior secured revolving credit facilities and the notes, on commercially reasonable terms or at all. If Mattel cannot service its indebtedness, Mattel may need to take actions such as selling assets, seeking additional equity or reducing or delaying capital expenditures, strategic acquisitions, investments and alliances. SuchThere can be no assurance that such actions, if necessary, may notwill be effected on commercially reasonable terms or at all. The credit agreement governing Mattel’s new senior secured revolving credit facilities and the indenture governing the notes will restrict Mattel’s ability to sell assets and use the proceeds from such sales.
If Mattel is unable to generate sufficient cash flow or areis otherwise unable to obtain funds necessary to meet required payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest on its indebtedness, or if Mattel otherwise fails to comply with the various covenants in the instruments governing its indebtedness, Mattel could be in default under the terms of the agreements governing such indebtedness. In the event of such default, the holders of such indebtedness couldwill have the right to elect to declare all the funds borrowed thereunder to be due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest, the lenders under Mattel’s new senior secured revolving credit facilities couldwill have the right to elect to terminate their commitments thereunder, cease making further loans and institute foreclosure proceedings against Mattel’s assets, and Mattel could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation. IfDeclines in Mattel’s operating performance declines, it may needrequire Mattel to obtain waivers in the future from the required lenders under its new senior secured revolving credit facilities to avoid being in default. If Mattel breaches its covenants under its new senior secured revolving credit facilities and seeks a waiver, Mattel may not be able to obtain a waiver from the required lenders. If this occurs, Mattel would be in default under its new senior secured revolving credit facilities, the lenders could exercise their rights, as described above, and Mattel could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation.
Mattel’s variable rate indebtedness subjects Mattel to interest rate risk, which could cause Mattel’s debt service obligations to increase significantly.
Borrowings under Mattel’s new senior secured revolving credit facilities will be at variable rates of interest and will expose Mattel to interest rate risk. Interest rates are currently at historically low levels. If interest rates increase, Mattel’s debt service obligations on the variable rate indebtedness will increase even though the amount borrowed remainedremains the same, and Mattel’s net income and cash flows, including cash available for servicing its indebtedness, will correspondingly decrease. Assuming all revolving loans under Mattel’s newMattel's senior secured revolving credit facilities are fully drawn up to the maximum commitment level and the interest rates are above the interest rate floor set forth in the credit agreement governing Mattel’s new senior secured revolving credit facilities, each one-eighth point change in interest rates would result in a $2.0 million change in annual interest expense on Mattel’s indebtedness under its new senior secured revolving credit facilities. However, Mattel may maintainAny interest rate swaps that Mattel enters into with respect to any of its variable rate indebtedness, and any swaps Mattel enters into may not fully mitigate Mattel’s interest rate risk.
Mattel is dependent upon its lenders for financing to execute its business strategy and meet its liquidity needs. If Mattel’s lenders are unable to fund borrowings under their credit commitments or Mattel is unable to borrow, it could negatively impactadversely affect Mattel’s business.business, financial condition, and results of operations.
In the current volatile credit market, thereThere is risk that anyone or more of Mattel's lenders, even those with strong balance sheets and sound lending practices, could fail or refuse to honor their legal commitments and obligations under existing credit commitments, including but not limited to:to extending credit up to the maximum amount permitted by a credit facility and otherwise accessing capital and/or honoring loan commitments. If Mattel’s lenders are unable to fund borrowings under their credit commitments or Mattel is unable to borrow, it could be difficult in this environment to replace Mattel’s new senior secured revolving credit facilities on similar terms.terms, which could adversely affect Mattel's business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Significant changes in currency exchange rates or the ability to transfer capital across borders could have a significantan adverse effect on Mattel’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Mattel operates facilities and sells products in numerous countries outside the U.S. During 2017,2019, Mattel’s International segment net sales were 42%44% of Mattel’s total consolidated net sales. Furthermore, Mattel’s net investment in its foreign subsidiaries and its results of operations and cash flows are subject to changes in currency exchange rates and regulations. Highly inflationary economies of certain foreign countries can result in foreign currency devaluation, which negatively impacts Mattel’s profitability. Mattel seeks to mitigate the exposure of its results of operations to fluctuations in currency exchange rates by aligning its prices with the local currency cost of acquiring inventory, distributing earnings in U.S. dollars, and partially hedging this exposure using foreign currency forward exchange contracts. These contracts are primarily used to hedge Mattel’s purchase and sale of inventory, and other intercompany transactions denominated in foreign currencies. Government action may restrict Mattel’s ability to transfer capital across borders and may also impact the fluctuation of currencies in the countries where Mattel conducts business or has invested capital. Significant changes in currency exchange rates, reductions in Mattel’s ability to transfer its capital across borders, and changes in government-fixed currency exchange rates, including the Chinese yuan, could have a significantan adverse effect on Mattel’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
If
The deterioration of global economic conditions deteriorate,could adversely affect Mattel’s business, financial condition, and financial results could be adversely affected.of operations.
Mattel designs, manufactures, and markets a wide variety of toy products worldwide through sales to retailer customers and directly to consumers. Mattel’s performance is impacted by the level of discretionary consumer spending, which remains relatively weak in many countries around the world in which Mattel does business. Consumers’ discretionary purchases of toy products may beare often impacted by job losses, foreclosures, bankruptcies, reduced access to credit, significantly falling home prices, lower consumer confidence, and other macroeconomic factors that affect consumer spending behavior. Any of these factors can reduce the amount whichthat consumers spend on the purchase of Mattel’s products. Deterioration of global economic conditions have at times in the past adversely affected Mattel's business and financial results. Future deterioration of global economic conditions or disruptions in credit markets in the markets in which Mattel operates could potentially have a material adverse effect on Mattel’s liquidity and capital resources, including increasing Mattel’s cost of capital or its ability to raise additional capital if needed, or otherwise adversely affect Mattel’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. For instance, Mattel's business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by the economic impact of changes in trade relations among the United States and other countries, including a new United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, China, or changes in the European Union, such as Brexit. For further discussion of these risks, see below risk factor "Political developments, including trade relations, and the threat or occurrence of war or terrorist activities could adversely impact Mattel, its personnel and facilities, its customers and suppliers, retail and financial results.markets, and general economic conditions."
In addition to experiencing potentially lower revenues during times of economic difficulty, in an effort to maintain sales during such times, Mattel may need to increase promotional spending or take other steps to encourage retailer and consumer purchase of its products. Those steps may increase costs and/or decrease operating margins.margins and are not always successful.
An increasing portion of Mattel's business mayis expected to come from new and emerging markets, and growing business in new and emerging markets presents additional challenges.
Mattel expects an increasing portion of its net revenues to come from new and emerging markets, including China, India, and Russia. Operating in new and emerging markets, each with its own unique consumer preferences and business climates, presents additional challenges that Mattel must meet. In addition, sales and operations in new and emerging markets are subject to other risks associated with international operations. Such risks include complications in complying with different laws in varying jurisdictions; dealing with changes in governmental policies and the evolution of laws and regulations that impact Mattel's product offerings and related enforcement; difficulties understanding the retail climate, consumer trends, local customs and competitive conditions in foreign markets, which may beare often quite different from the U.S.; difficulties in moving materials and products from one country to another, including port congestion, strikes and other transportation delays and interruptions; potential challenges to Mattel's transfer pricing determinations and other aspects of its cross border transactions; and the impact of tariffs, quotas, or other protectionist measures.
Because of the importance of Mattel's new and emerging market net revenues, failure to properly manage the risks described above or to otherwise successfully manage its new and emerging market business could adversely affect Mattel's business, financial condition, and results of operations could be harmed if any of the risks described above are not properly managed, or if Mattel is otherwise unsuccessful in managing its new and emerging market business.
operations.
An increasing portion of Mattel's business may come from technologically advanced or sophisticated digital and smart technology products, which present additional challenges compared to more traditional toys and games.
Mattel expects that children will continue to be interested in product offerings incorporating sophisticated technology, such as video games, consumer electronics, and social and digital media, at younger and younger ages. Mattel also expects that parents will seek to enhance child development and learning through digital technologies and analog and technology-based play.
In addition to the risks associated with Mattel’s more traditional products, sophisticated digital and smart technology products face certain additional risks. Costs associated with designing, developing, and producing technologically advanced or sophisticated products tend to be higher than for many of Mattel’s more traditional products. Heavy competition in consumer electronics and entertainment products and difficult economic conditions may increase the risk of Mattel not achieving sales sufficient to recover the increased costs associated with these products. Designing, developing, and producing sophisticated digital and smart technology products requires different competencies and may follow longer timelines than traditional toys and games, and any delays in the design, development, or production of these products could have a significantadversely impact on Mattel's ability to successfully offer such products. In addition, the pace of change in product offerings and consumer tastes in the video games, consumer electronics, and social and digital media areas is potentially even greater than for Mattel’s more traditional products. This pace of change means that the window in which a technologically advanced or sophisticated product can achieve and maintain consumer interest may be shorter than traditional toys and games. These products may also present data security and data privacy risks and be subject to certain laws, government policies or regulations not applicable to more traditional products, such as the U.S. Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998, and the EU Data Protection Directive (Directive 95/46/EC), which will be succeeded by the EU General Data Protection Regulation, which took effect in May 2018, and related national regulations. For further discussion of these risks, see below risk factor "Mattel relies extensively on information technology in its operations, and any material failure, inadequacy, interruption, or security breach of that technology could have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition, and results of operations."
Mattel relies extensively on information technology in its operations, and any material failure, inadequacy, interruption, or security breach of that technology could have a materialan adverse impacteffect on its business.business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Mattel relies extensively on information technology systems across its operations, including for management of its supply chain, sale and delivery of its products and services, reporting its results of operations, collection and storage of consumer data, personal data of customers, employees and other stakeholders, and various other processes and transactions. Many of these systems are managed by third-party service providers. Mattel uses third-party technology and systems for a variety of reasons, including, without limitation, encryption and authentication technology, employee email, content delivery to customers, back-office support, and other functions. A small and growing volume of Mattel’s consumer products and services are web-based, and some are offered in conjunction with business partners or such third-party service providers. Mattel and its business partners and third-party service providers collect, process, store, and transmit consumer data, including personal information, in connection with those products and services. Failure to follow applicable regulations related to those activities, or to prevent or mitigate data loss or other security breaches, including breaches of Mattel’s business partners’ technology and systems, could expose Mattel or its customers to a risk of loss or misuse of such information, which could adversely affect Mattel’s operating results, result in regulatory enforcement, other litigation and potential liability for Mattel, and otherwise harm its business. Mattel’s ability to effectively manage its business and coordinate the production, distribution, and sale of its products and services depends significantly on the reliability and capacity of these systems and third-party service providers. AlthoughThe systems and processes Mattel has developed systems and processes that are designed to protect customerpersonal information and prevent data loss and other security breaches, including systems and processes designed to reduce the impact of a security breach at a third partythird-party provider such measures cannotdo not provide absolute security.security, and any failure or inadequacy of such systems or processes could have an adverse effect on Mattel's business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Mattel has exposure to similar security risks faced by other large companies that have data stored on their information technology systems. To its knowledge, Mattel has not experienced any material breach of its cybersecuritynetwork systems. If Mattel’s or its third-party service providersproviders' systems fail to operate effectively or are damaged, destroyed, or shut down, or there are problems with transitioning to upgraded or replacement systems, or there are security breaches in these systems, any of the aforementionedwhich could occur as a result of natural disasters, software or equipment failures, telecommunications failures, loss or theft of equipment, acts of terrorism, circumvention of security systems, or other cyber-attacks, including denial-of-service attacks, Mattel could experience delays or decreases in product sales and reduced efficiency of its operations. Additionally, any of these types of events could lead to violations of privacy laws, loss of customers, or loss, misappropriation or corruption of confidential information, trade secrets, or data, which could expose Mattel to potential litigation, regulatory actions, sanctions, or other statutory penalties, any or all of which could adversely affect its business, and cause it to incur significant losses and remediation costs.
Additionally,As a global company, Mattel regularly moves data across national borders to conduct its operations, and consequently is subject to a variety of continuously evolving and developing laws and regulations in the U.S. and abroad regarding privacy, data protection, and data security, including those related to the collection, storage, handling, use, disclosure, transfer, and security of personal data. Significant uncertainty exists as privacy and data protection laws may be interpreted and applied differently from country to country and may create inconsistent or conflicting requirements. For example, the EU General Data Protection Regulation, which greatly increases the jurisdictional reach of European Union law and becomesbecame effective in May 2018, addsadded a broad array of requirements for handling personal data, including the public disclosure of significant data breaches, and imposes substantial penalties for non-compliance. Mattel’s efforts to complyongoing compliance with GDPRthe EU General Data Protection Regulation and other privacy and data protection laws, may imposesuch as the California Consumer Privacy Act, imposes significant costs and challenges that are likely to increase over time.
Mattel’s business depends in large part on the success of its vendors and outsourcers and Mattel’s brands and reputation may be harmed byare subject to harm from actions taken by third-partiesthird parties that are outside Mattel’s control. In addition, any materialsignificant failure, inadequacy, or interruption resulting from such vendors or outsourcingsoutsourcers could harm Mattel’s ability to effectively operate its business.
As a part of its efforts to cut costs, achieve better efficiencies and increase productivity and service quality, Mattel relies significantly on vendor and outsourcing relationships with third parties for services and systems including manufacturing, transportation, logistics, and information technology. Any shortcoming of a Mattel vendor or outsourcer, particularly an issue affecting the quality of these services or systems, may be attributed by customersresults in risk of damage to Mattel, thus damaging Mattel’s reputation and brand value, and potentially affecting itsadverse effects to Mattel's business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, problems with transitioning these services and systems to, or operating failures with, these vendors and outsourcers could cause delays in product sales and reduce efficiency of Mattel’s operations, and significant capital investments could be required to remediate the problem.
If Mattel is not ablefaces risks related to adequately protectprotecting its proprietary intellectual property and information, and protect against third partyis subject to third-party claims that Mattel is infringing on their intellectual property rights, itseither of which could adversely affect Mattel's business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.operations.
The value of Mattel’s business depends on its ability to protect its intellectual property and information, including its trademarks, trade names, copyrights, patents, trade secrets, and rights under intellectual property license agreements and other agreements with third parties, in the U.S. and around the world, as well as its customer, employee, and consumer data. From time to time, third parties have challenged, and may in the future try to challenge, Mattel's ownership of its intellectual property in the U.S. and around the world. In addition, Mattel's business is subject to the risk of third parties counterfeiting its products or infringing on its intellectual property rights. The steps Mattel has taken may not prevent unauthorized use of its intellectual property, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect its intellectual property as fully as in the U.S. Mattel may need to resortat times resorts to litigation to protect its intellectual property rights, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources. If Mattel failsMattel's failure to protect its proprietary intellectual property and information, including with respect to any successful challenge to Mattel’s ownership of its intellectual property or materialsignificant infringements of its intellectual property, this failure could have a significantan adverse effect on Mattel’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Mattel has acquired certain intellectual properties from third parties. Declines in the profitability of these acquired brands may impact Mattel’s ability to recover the carrying value of the related assets and could result in an impairment charge. Reduction in net earnings caused by impairment charges could harm Mattel’s financial results.results of operations.
Unfavorable resolution of or adverse developments in legal proceedings, other investigations, or regulatory matters could have a significantan adverse effect on Mattel’s business, financial condition.condition, and results of operations.
Mattel periodically receives claims of infringement of intellectual property rights held by other parties. Responding to any infringement claim, regardless of its validity, may be costly and time-consuming and may divert management and key personnel from business operations. If Mattel, its distributors, its licensors or its manufacturers are found to be infringingFindings of infringement on the intellectual property rights of any third party theyby Mattel, its distributors, its licensors or its manufacturers may be required to obtainrequire obtaining a license to use those rights, which may not be obtainable on reasonable terms, if at all.
Mattel is, from time to time, involved in litigation or other disputes, investigations, and regulatory matters. An unfavorable resolution of these matters could have a significantan adverse effect on Mattel’s business, financial condition, and itsresults of operations. Regardless of their outcome, these matters may result in substantial costs and expenses, significantly divert the attention of management, or interrupt Mattel’s normal business operations. There can be no assurance that Mattel will be able to prevail in, or achieve a favorable settlement of, any of these matters.
Mattel is subject to various laws and government policies or regulations in numerous jurisdictions, violation of which could subject it to sanctions. In addition, changes in such laws or policies or regulations may lead to increased costs, changes in Mattel’s effective tax rate, or the interruption of normal business operations that would negatively impactcould adversely affect Mattel’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Mattel operates in a highly regulated environment in the U.S. and international markets. U.S. federal, state, and local governmental entities, and foreign governments regulate many aspects of Mattel’s business, including its products and the importation and exportation of its products.products, and these laws and regulations can change frequently. These policies or regulations may include accounting standards, taxation requirements (including changes in applicable income tax rates, new tax laws, and revised tax law interpretations), product safety and other safety standards, trade restrictions, duties and tariffs (including international trade laws and regulations, export controls, and economic sanctions), and regulations regarding currency and financial matters, anticorruption standards (such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act), environmental matters, advertising directed toward children, product content, and privacy and data protection, as well as other administrative and regulatory restrictions. WhileThe steps Mattel takes all the steps it believes are necessary to comply with these laws and policies or regulations there can be no assurancedo not ensure that Mattel will be in compliance in the future. Compliance with these various laws, regulations, and policies imposes significant costs on Mattel’s business, and failure to comply could result in monetary liabilities and other penalties and could lead to significant negative media attention and consumer dissatisfaction, which could have a significantan adverse effect on Mattel’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
In addition, changes in laws, or policies or regulations may lead to increased costs, changes in Mattel’s effective tax rate, or the interruption of normal business operations, any of which could negatively impact its financial condition and results of operations. In particular,Specifically, in December 2017, the recently enacted U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("Tax Act" or(the "U.S. Tax Reform”Act") was signed into law and guidancesignificantly revised the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. This legislation, among other things, contains significant changes to be issued bycorporate taxation, including the reduction of the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% beginning in 2018. Notwithstanding the reduction in the corporate income tax rate, Mattel is continuing to examine the long-term impact of the U.S. Tax Act. During 2019, the Department of the Treasury issued certain guidance in the form of notices and Internal Revenue Service relatedproposed regulations with respect to certainseveral provisions of thesethe U.S. Tax Reform provisionsAct. It is anticipated that additional regulations or other guidance may have a material adverse effect on Mattel’s net income and cash flows, and many aspects ofbe issued with respect to the U.S. Tax Reform are unclearAct in 2020 and may not be clarified for some time. For example, compliance with U.S Tax Reform may require the collection of information not regularly produced within Mattel, the use of provisional estimates in its financial statements, and the exercise of significant judgment in accounting for its provisions.subsequent years. As regulations and guidance evolve with respect to the U.S. Tax Reform,Act, this could have a material adverse effect on Mattel’s financial performance. In addition, it is uncertain if, and as Mattel gathers more informationto what extent, various states will conform to the new tax law and performs more analysis, Mattel’s results may differ from previous estimates and may materiallyhow foreign jurisdictions will react to the new tax law by adopting tax legislation or taking other actions that could adversely affect its financial position.Mattel's business.
In addition, increases in import and excise duties and/or sales or value added taxes in the jurisdictions in which Mattel operates could affect the affordability of Mattel’s products and, therefore, reduce demand.
IssuesFrom time to time, issues with products may lead to product liability, personal injury or property damage claims, recalls, withdrawals, replacements of products, or regulatory or other actions by governmental authorities, thatwhich could divert resources, affect business operations, decrease sales, increase costs, and put Mattel at a competitive disadvantage, any of which could have a significantan adverse effect on Mattel’s business, financial condition.condition, and results of operations.
Mattel has at times in the past experienced, and may in the future experience, issues with products that may lead to product liability, personal injury or property damage claims, recalls, withdrawals, replacements of products, or regulatory actions by governmental authorities. Any of theseThese issues and activities could resulthave resulted in increased governmental scrutiny and inquiries, harm to Mattel’s reputation, reduced demand by consumers for its products, decreased willingness by retailer customers to purchase or provide marketing support for those products, adverse impacts on Mattel’s ability to enter into licensing agreements for products on competitive terms, absence or increased cost of insurance, or additional safety and testing requirements. Such results couldFor example, the insurance terms we negotiated for the period from February 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021 were less favorable than in the past as a result of past claims, product liability incidents, changes in market conditions, and other factors. These issues and activities can divert development and management resources, adversely affect Mattel’s business operations, decrease sales, increase legal fees and other costs, and put Mattel at a competitive disadvantage compared to other manufacturers not affected by similar issues with products, any of which could have a significantan adverse effect on Mattel’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Mattel’s current and future operating procedures and product requirements may increase costs, significantly and adversely affect its relationship with vendors, and make it more difficult for Mattel to produce, purchase, and deliver products on a timely basis to meet market demands. Future conditions may require Mattel to adopt further changes that may increase its costs and further affect its relationship with vendors.
Mattel’s current operating procedures and product requirements, including testing requirements and standards, have imposed costs on both Mattel and the vendors from which it purchases products. Changes in business conditions, including those resulting from new legislative and regulatory requirements, have at times in the past caused, and in the future could cause, further revisions in Mattel’s operating procedures and product requirements. Changes in Mattel’s operating procedures and product requirements maycan delay delivery of products and increase costs. Mattel’s relationshiprelationships with its existing vendors may be adversely affected as a result of these changes, making Mattel more dependent on a smaller number of vendors. Mattel is not currently dependent on a single supplier or group of suppliers. Some vendors may choose not to continue to do business with Mattel or not to accommodate Mattel’s needs to the extent that they have done in the past. In addition, rising production costs, contraction of credit availability, and labor shortages have caused a substantial contraction in the number of toy manufacturers in China, decreasing the number of potential vendors to manufacture Mattel’s products. Because of the seasonal nature of Mattel’s business and the demands of its customers for deliveries with short lead times, Mattel depends upon the cooperation of its vendors to meet market demand for its products in a timely manner. There can be no assurance that existing and future events will not require Mattel to adopt additional requirements and incur additional costs, and impose those requirements and costs on its vendors, which may adversely affect its relationship with those vendors and Mattel’s ability to meet market demand in a timely manner.
The production and sale of private-label toys by Mattel’s retail customers may result in lower purchases of Mattel-branded products by those retail customers.
In recent years, consumer goods companies, including those in the toy business, generally have experienced the phenomenon of retail customers developing their own private-label products that directly compete with the products of traditional manufacturers. Some retail chains and online retailers that are customers of Mattel, including its largest retail customers, Walmart and Target, sell private-label toys designed, manufactured, and branded by the retailers themselves. These toys may be sold at prices lower than comparable toys sold by Mattel and may result in lower purchases of Mattel-branded products by these retailers. In some cases, retailers who sell these private-label toys are larger than Mattel and have substantially more resources than Mattel.
Mattel depends on key personnel and may not be able to hire, retain, and integrate sufficient qualified personnel to maintain and expand its business.
Mattel’s future success depends partly on the continued contribution of key executives, designers, technical, sales, marketing, manufacturing, and other personnel. The loss of services of any of Mattel’s key personnel could harm Mattel’s business. Recruiting and retaining skilled personnel is costly and highly competitive. If Mattel fails to retain, hire, train, and integrate qualified employees and contractors, Mattel may not be able to maintain or expand its business.
Political developments, including trade relations, and the threat or occurrence of war or terrorist activities could adversely impact Mattel, its personnel and facilities, its customers and suppliers, retail and financial markets, and general economic conditions.
Mattel’s business is worldwide in scope, including operations in over 50 countries and territories. Political instability, civil unrest, the deterioration of the political situation in a country in which Mattel has significant sales or operations, or the breakdown of trade relations between the U.S. and a foreign country in which Mattel has significant manufacturing facilities or other operations, could adversely affect Mattel’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. For example, a change in trade status forbetween the U.S. and China or Mexico could result in a substantial increase in the import duty of toys manufactured in these countries and imported into the U.S. There is currently significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the U.S. and China, including with respect to trade policies, tariffs, treaties, and government regulations. The current U.S. presidential administration has called for substantial changes to U.S. foreign trade policy with respect to China, including the possibility of imposing greater restrictions on international trade and significant increases in tariffs on goods imported into the U.S. Recently, the U.S. has increased tariffs on certain goods imported into the U.S. from China, following which the Chinese government increased tariffs on certain goods imported into China from the U.S., in response to which the U.S. announced plans to impose additional tariffs. There is a risk of further escalation and retaliatory actions between the two countries. In addition, the current administration, certain members of Congress, and federal officials have stated that the U.S. may seek to implement more protective trade measures, not just with respect to China, but with respect to other countries in the Asia Pacific region as well. Any increased trade barriers or restrictions on global trade, especially trade with China, could adversely affect Mattel's business, financial condition, and results of operations.
In addition, the occurrence of war or hostilities between countries or threat of terrorist activities, and the responses to and results of these activities, could adversely impact Mattel, its personnel and facilities, its customers and suppliers, retail and financial markets, and general economic conditions.
Disruptions in Mattel’s manufacturing operations or supply chain due to political instability, civil unrest, or disease could negatively impactadversely affect Mattel’s business, financial position, sales, and results of operations.
Mattel owns, operates and manages manufacturing facilities and utilizes third-party manufacturers and suppliers throughout Asia, primarily in China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Canada, and Mexico. The risk of political instability and civil unrest exists in certain of these countries, which could temporarily or permanently damage Mattel’sthe manufacturing operations of Mattel or its third-party manufacturers located there. Outbreaks of communicable diseases have also been known to occur in certain of these countries. In the past, outbreaks of SARSavian flu have been significantly concentrated in Asia, particularly in Hong Kong, and in the Guangdong province of China, where many of Mattel’s manufacturing facilities and third-party manufacturers are located. More recently, a strain of coronavirus surfaced in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, resulting in a public health crisis. Disruptions from public health crises such as these result from, among other things, workers contracting diseases, restrictions on factory openings, restrictions on travel, restrictions on shipping, and the closure of critical infrastructure. The design, development, and manufacture of Mattel’s products could suffer if a significant number of Mattel’s employees or the employees of its third-party manufacturers or their suppliers contract SARS, avian flu or other communicable diseases such as these, or otherwiseif Mattel, Mattel’s third-party manufacturers, or their suppliers are unable to fulfill their obligations to Mattel. Whileadversely affected by other impacts of such diseases. In addition, the contingency plans Mattel has developed contingency plans designed to help mitigate the impact of disruptions in its manufacturing operations, may not prevent its business, financial position, sales, and results of operations could be negatively impactedfrom being adversely affected by a significant disruption to its manufacturing operations or suppliers.
Earthquakes or other catastrophic events out of Mattel’s control may damage its facilities or those of its contractors and harmadversely affect Mattel’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Mattel has significant operations near major earthquake faults, including its corporate headquarters in El Segundo, California. A catastrophic event where Mattel has important operations, such as an earthquake, tsunami, flood, typhoon, fire, or other natural or manmade disaster, could disrupt Mattel’s operations or those of its contractors and impair production or distribution of its products, damage inventory, interrupt critical functions, or otherwise affect its business negatively, harmingadversely affecting Mattel’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The production and sale of private-label toys by Mattel’s retail customers may result in lower purchases of Mattel-branded products by those retail customers.
In recent years, consumer goods companies, including thoseMattel has at times in the toy business, generally have experienced the phenomenon of retail customers developing their own private-label products that directly compete with the products of traditional manufacturers. Some retail chains that are customers of Mattel sell private-label toys designed, manufactured and branded by the retailers themselves. These toys may be sold at prices lower than comparable toys sold by Mattelpast engaged, and may result in lower purchases of Mattel-branded products by these retailers. In some cases, retailers who sell these private-label toys are larger than Mattel and may have substantially more resources than Mattel.
Mattel depends on key personnel and may not be able to hire, retain, and integrate sufficient qualified personnel to maintain and expand its business.
Mattel’sthe future success depends partly on the continued contribution of key executives, designers, technical, sales, marketing, manufacturing, and other personnel. The loss of services of any of Mattel’s key personnel could harm Mattel’s business. Recruiting and retaining skilled personnel is costly and highly competitive. If Mattel fails to retain, hire, train, and integrate qualified employees and contractors, Mattel may not be able to maintain or expand its business.
Mattel may engage in acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, or other strategic transactions, which maycan affect theMattel's revenues, profit, revenues, profit margins, debt-to-capital ratio, capital expenditures, or other aspects of Mattel’s business. In addition, Mattel has certain anti-takeover provisions in its bylaws that may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire Mattel without its consent, which may adversely affect Mattel’s stock price.
Mattel regularly considers, and from time to time may engageengages in, discussions and negotiations regarding acquisitions, mergers, or dispositions, or other strategic transactions that could affect the profit, revenues, profit margins, debt-to-capital ratio, capital expenditures, or other aspects of Mattel’s business. There can be no assurance that Mattel will be able to identify suitable acquisition targets or merger partners or that, if identified, it will be able to complete these transactions on terms acceptable to Mattel and to potential merger partners. There can also be no assurance that Mattel will be successful in integrating any acquired company into its overall operations, or that any such acquired company will operate profitably or will not otherwise adversely impact Mattel’s results of operations. Further, Mattel cannot be certain that key talented individuals at those acquired companies will continue to work for Mattel after the acquisition or that they will continue to develop popular and profitable products or services. In addition, Mattel has certain anti-takeover provisions in its bylaws that may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire Mattel without its consent, which may adversely affect Mattel’s stock price.
The level of returns on pension plan assets and the actuarial assumptions used for valuation purposes could affect Mattel’s earnings in future periods. Changes in standards and government regulations could also affect its pension plan expense and funding requirements.
Assumptions used in determining projected benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets for Mattel’s pension plan are evaluated by Mattel in consultation with outside actuaries. In the event that Mattel determines that changes are warranted in the assumptions used, such as the discount rate, expected long term rate of return, or health care costs, its future pension benefit expenses could increase or decrease. Due to changing market conditions or changes in the participant population, the actuarial assumptions that Mattel uses may differ from actual results, which could have a significantan impact on its pension and postretirement liability and related costs. Funding obligations are determined based on the value of assets and liabilities on a specific date as required under relevant government regulations for each plan. Future pension funding requirements, and the timing of funding payments, could be affected by legislation enacted by the relevant governmental authorities.
If Mattel’s goodwill becomes impaired, Mattel’s results of operations could be adversely affected.
Mattel tests its goodwill for impairment annually or more often if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment may have occurred. For purposes of evaluating whether goodwill is impaired, goodwill is allocated to various reporting units, which are at the operating segment level. Declines in profitability of Mattel’s reporting units may impact the fair value of its reporting units, which could result in a write-downan impairment of its goodwill, negatively impactingadversely affecting its results of operations. For more information, see Part I, Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Goodwill" and Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Goodwill and Other Intangibles".
Intangibles."
Mattel’s stock price has been volatile over the past several years and could decline in the future, resulting in losses for Mattel's investors.
All the factors discussed in this section or any other material announcements or events couldcan affect Mattel's stock price. In addition, quarterly fluctuations in Mattel's operating results, changes in investor and analyst perception of Mattel's business risks and conditions of our business, Mattel's ability to meet earnings estimates and other performance expectations of financial analysts or investors, unfavorable commentary or downgrades of Mattel's stock by research analysts, fluctuations in the stock prices of Mattel's peer companies or in stock markets in general, and general economic or political conditions couldcan also cause the price of Mattel's stock to change. A significant drop in the price of Mattel's stock couldwould expose Mattel to the risk of securities class action lawsuits, which could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources, adversely affecting Mattel's business. There is a purported class action alleging federal securities laws violations currently pending in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals following dismissal of the lawsuit by the United States District Court for the Central District of California against Mattel and individual defendants. In addition, a stockholder has filed a derivative action in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware making allegations that are substantially identical to, or are based upon, the allegations of the class action lawsuit. For more information, see Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 1112 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Commitments and Contingencies—Litigation".Litigation."
Mattel’s restatement of certain of its previously issued financial statements and other related events have and may continue to impose unanticipated costs, affect investor confidence, and cause reputational harm.
Mattel filed an amended Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 to (1) restate the unaudited quarterly financial data for the three month periods ended September 30, 2017 and ended December 31, 2017 set forth in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Restatement of Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited) (including restatement related information for the nine months ended September 30, 2017); and (2) restate Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting included under Item 8 and the Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures included under Item 9A. The restated consolidated financial statements and financial information also reflected revisions for other immaterial misstatements. The restatement followed an independent investigation conducted by the Audit Committee of Mattel’s Board of Directors into allegations contained in an anonymous whistleblower letter Mattel was made aware of on August 6, 2019. Mattel has incurred, and may continue to incur, unanticipated costs in connection with or related to the investigation and restatement, as well as litigation and regulatory inquiries resulting therefrom. For example, in December 2019, Mattel received a subpoena from the SEC, seeking documents related to the whistleblower letter and subsequent investigation, and is responding to the SEC’s subpoena. In addition, the investigation, restatement, and related media coverage may negatively affect investor confidence in the accuracy of Mattel’s financial disclosures and cause it reputational harm.
Any material weaknesses in Mattel's internal control over financial reporting which, if not remediated appropriately or timely, could affect Mattel's ability to record, process, and report financial information accurately, impair its ability to prepare financial statements, negatively affect investor confidence, and cause reputational harm.
Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable and accurate financial reporting and financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A failure to maintain effective internal control processes could lead to violations, unintentional or otherwise, of laws and regulations. As disclosed in Part II, Item 9A “Controls and Procedures,” in Mattel's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2018, Mattel determined that there were material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting at the time of the preparation of its financial statements for the quarters ending on September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2017. As a result, Mattel concluded that its internal control over financial reporting continued to be ineffective as of December 31, 2018. Mattel has determined that the material weaknesses have been remediated and that its internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31, 2019. However, if Mattel is unable to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting or disclosure controls and procedures, its ability to record, process, and report financial information accurately, and to prepare financial statements within required time periods, could be adversely affected. Litigation, government investigations, or regulatory enforcement actions arising out of any such failure or alleged failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could subject us to civil and criminal penalties that could materially and adversely affect Mattel's reputation, financial condition, and operating results. If Mattel is unable to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, the material weakness, remediation efforts, and any related litigation or government investigations, or regulatory enforcement actions will require management attention and resources, and the incurrence of unanticipated costs, and could negatively affect investor confidence in Mattel’s financial statements, cause it reputational harm, and raise other risks to its operations. In addition, the costs and other effects of defending litigation or addressing government investigations or regulatory enforcement actions against us are difficult to determine and could adversely affect Mattel's financial condition and operating results.
If Mattel’s independent registered public accounting firm is determined not to satisfy the SEC’s and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s ("PCAOB") auditor independence requirements, Mattel may not be compliant with applicable securities laws, which could result in a material adverse effect on Mattel’s business, operating results, and financial condition, negatively affect investor confidence and cause reputational harm, and may impact the Company’s ability to comply with certain covenants.
In connection with the anonymous whistleblower letter that was announced in a Form 8-K filed on August 8, 2019, the independent investigation conducted by the Audit Committee of Mattel’s Board of Directors and a separate investigation by Mattel’s outside auditor concluded that certain actions by the lead audit partner of Mattel’s outside auditor were in violation of the SEC’s auditor independence rules. Both the Audit Committee and Mattel’s outside auditor separately concluded, after evaluating the nature and severity of these matters, that Mattel’s outside auditor remains capable of exercising objective and impartial judgment on all issues with respect to pending and relevant past audits. The Audit Committee also determined that Mattel’s outside auditor should remain as Mattel’s independent registered public accounting firm.
However, if Mattel’s outside auditor is determined by regulatory authorities not to be capable of exercising objective and impartial judgment in connection with the audits of Mattel's financial statements, or if, for whatever reason, Mattel’s outside auditor finds that it cannot confirm that it is capable of exercising objective and impartial judgment in connection with the audits of Mattel’s financial statements, in each case in accordance with applicable securities laws and applicable rules, regulations, and standards of the SEC and PCAOB, Mattel’s outside auditor would be terminated and Mattel could experience failures to meet its reporting obligations under applicable securities laws. Mattel will also need to take action and incur unanticipated costs in order for Mattel’s SEC filings containing financial statements to be determined compliant with applicable securities laws. Such action may include obtaining the review and audit of Mattel’s financial statements by another independent registered public accounting firm. In addition, under such circumstances, Mattel’s eligibility to issue securities under its existing registration statements on Form S-3 and Form S-8 may be impacted and its ability to comply with certain covenants under certain of its debt financing arrangements may be impacted. Such consequences could have a material adverse effect on Mattel’s business, operating results, and financial condition, and negatively affect investor confidence and cause reputational harm. Mattel also could experience unanticipated costs or delays or other failures to meet its reporting obligations under applicable securities laws and its ability to comply with certain covenants under certain of its debt financing arrangements may be impacted.
| |
| Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments. |
None.
Mattel owns its corporate headquarters in El Segundo, California, consisting of approximately 335,000 square feet, and an adjacent office building consisting of approximately 55,000 square feet. Mattel also leases buildings in El Segundo consisting of approximately 327,000 square feet. All segments use these facilities. Mattel also owns facilities in East Aurora, New York, consisting of approximately 607,000 square feet, which is used by the North America segment and for brand and corporate support functions. American Girl owns its headquarters facilities in Middleton, Wisconsin, consisting of approximately 180,000 square feet, a warehouse in Middleton, consisting of approximately 215,000 square feet, and distribution facilities in Middleton, DeForest, and Wilmot, Wisconsin, consisting of a total of approximately 948,000 square feet, all of which are used by the American Girl segment. Additionally, Mattel leases a facility in Montreal, Canada, consisting of approximately 817,000 square feet, which is used for brand support and manufacturing functions, and a warehouse in Lachine, Canada, consisting of approximately 360,000 square feet. These facilities in Canada are used by both the North America and International segments. Mattel also owns its principal manufacturing facilities located in Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, and Thailand.
Mattel maintains leased offices in Arkansas, California, Minnesota, and New York, and leased warehouse and distribution facilities in California, Pennsylvania, and Texas, all of which are used by the North America segment. Mattel has leased retail and related office space in Chicago, Illinois,Illinois; Los Angeles, California,California; and New York, New York for its American Girl Place stores, and in Alpharetta, Georgia, Bloomington, Minnesota, Charlotte, North Carolina, Chesterfield, Missouri, Columbus, Ohio, Dallas, Texas, Houston, Texas, Lone Tree, Colorado, Lynnwood, Washington, McLean, Virginia, Miami, Florida, Nashville, Tennessee, Natick, Massachusetts, Orlando, Florida, Overland Park, Kansas, Palo Alto, California, and Scottsdale, Arizonaover 10 other cities across the United States for its American Girl stores. Internationally, Mattel has offices and/or warehouse space in Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bermuda, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Panama, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey, and the United Kingdom, which areover 30 countries. The primary locations for facilities leased (with the exception of office and warehouse space in Chile and certain warehouse space in France that is owned by Mattel) and used by the International segment.segment are in Canada, China, Hong Kong, India, Mexico, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy, France, and the United Kingdom. Mattel also hasleases office space and principal manufacturing facilities in China, which support the North America, International, and American Girl segments. Additionally, Mattel leases a facility in Montreal, Canada, consisting of approximately 817,000 square feet, which is used for brand support and manufacturing functions. These facilities in Canada are used by both the North America and International segments.
For leases that are scheduled to expire duringwithin the next twelve months, Mattel may negotiate new lease agreements, renew existing lease agreements, or utilize alternate facilities. See Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 117 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Commitments and Contingencies.Leases." Mattel believes that its owned and leased facilities, in general, are suitable and adequate for its present and currently foreseeable needs.
| |
| Item 3. | Legal Proceedings. |
See Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 1112 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Commitments and Contingencies—Litigation."
| |
| Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures. |
Not applicable.
PART II
| |
| Item 5. | Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. |
Market Information
For information regarding the markets in which Mattel’s common stock, par value $1.00 per share, is traded seeunder the cover page hereof. For information regarding the high and low closing prices of Mattel’s common stock for the last two calendar years, see Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)."symbol "MAT" on The Nasdaq Global Select Market.
Holders of Record
As of February 16, 2018,7, 2020, Mattel had approximately 27,00025,000 holders of record of its common stock.
Dividends
During 2017, Mattel paid total dividends per share of $0.91, while during 2016, and 2015 Mattel paid total dividends per share of $1.52, in each year, to holders of its common stock. The Board of Directors declared the dividends on a quarterly basis, and Mattel paid the dividends during the quarters in which the dividends were declared. The payment of dividends on common stock is at the discretion of the Board of Directors and is subject to customary limitations.On October 26, 2017, Mattel announced that its Board of Directors determined to suspend Mattel's quarterly dividend beginning in the fourth quarter of 2017.
Under U.S. federal income tax rules, corporate dividends are designated as a dividend or a non-dividend distribution based on the applicable "earnings and profits" of the entity paying the dividend. U.S. Tax Reform was a factor in Mattel having sufficient earnings and profits in 2017. In 2017, based on reasonable assumptions by Mattel, 100% of the distribution is a taxable distribution for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the fourth quarter of 2017,2019, Mattel did not sell any unregistered securities.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015,2017, Mattel did not repurchase any shares of its common stock.
The following table provides certain information with respect to Mattel’s purchases of its common stock during the fourth quarter of 2017:2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased (1) | | Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit) | | Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2) |
| Period: | | | | | | | |
| October 1—31 | 23,863 |
| | $ | 15.50 |
| | — |
| | $ | 203,016,273 |
|
| November 1—30 | 23,833 |
| | 13.80 |
| | — |
| | 203,016,273 |
|
| December 1—31 | 28,135 |
| | 15.06 |
| | — |
| | 203,016,273 |
|
| Total | 75,831 |
| | $ | 14.80 |
| | — |
| | $ | 203,016,273 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased (a) | | Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit) | | Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (b) |
| Period: | | | | | | | |
| October 1 - 31 | 2,958 |
| | $ | 11.94 |
| | — |
| | $ | 203,016,273 |
|
| November 1 - 30 | 3,375 |
| | 11.70 |
| | — |
| | 203,016,273 |
|
| December 1 - 31 | 21,870 |
| | 13.79 |
| | — |
| | 203,016,273 |
|
| Total | 28,203 |
| | $ | 13.35 |
| | — |
| | $ | 203,016,273 |
|
| |
(1)(a) | The total number of shares purchased includes 75,83128,203 shares withheld from employees to satisfy minimum tax withholding obligations that occur upon vesting of restricted stock units. These shares were not purchased as part of a publicly announced repurchase plan or program. |
| |
(2)(b) | Mattel's share repurchase program was first announced on July 21, 2003. On July 17, 2013, the Board of Directors authorized Mattel to increase its share repurchase program by $500.0 million. At December 31, 2017,2019, share repurchase authorizations of $203.0 million had not been executed. Repurchases under the program will take place from time to time, depending on market conditions. Mattel’s share repurchase program has no expiration date. |
Performance Graph
The following graph compares the performance of Mattel's common stock with that of the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Index. The Cumulative Total Return listed below assumes an initial investment of $100 on December 31, 20122014 and reinvestment of dividends.
| | | | December 31, | December 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2017 | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 |
| Cumulative Total Return: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mattel, Inc. | $ | 100.00 |
| | $ | 134.34 |
| | $ | 91.19 |
| | $ | 85.04 |
| | $ | 90.36 |
| | $ | 52.52 |
| $ | 100.00 |
| | $ | 93.43 |
| | $ | 99.45 |
| | $ | 57.83 |
| | $ | 37.56 |
| | $ | 50.95 |
|
| S&P 500 | $ | 100.00 |
| | $ | 132.36 |
| | $ | 150.43 |
| | $ | 152.51 |
| | $ | 170.70 |
| | $ | 207.92 |
| $ | 100.00 |
| | $ | 101.37 |
| | $ | 113.49 |
| | $ | 138.26 |
| | $ | 132.19 |
| | $ | 173.80 |
|
| S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary | $ | 100.00 |
| | $ | 143.05 |
| | $ | 156.88 |
| | $ | 172.74 |
| | $ | 183.15 |
| | $ | 225.20 |
| $ | 100.00 |
| | $ | 110.11 |
| | $ | 116.75 |
| | $ | 143.57 |
| | $ | 144.74 |
| | $ | 185.18 |
|
| |
| Item 6. | Selected Financial Data. |
| | | | For the Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 (b) | | 2016 (b) | | 2015 (b) |
| | (In thousands, except per share and percentage information) | (In thousands, except per share and percentage information) |
| Operating Results: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net sales | $ | 4,881,951 |
| | $ | 5,456,650 |
| | $ | 5,702,613 |
| | $ | 6,023,819 |
| | $ | 6,484,892 |
| $ | 4,504,571 |
| | $ | 4,514,810 |
| | $ | 4,881,493 |
| | $ | 5,453,150 |
| | $ | 5,702,613 |
|
| Gross profit | 1,820,829 |
| | 2,554,391 |
| | 2,806,358 |
| | 3,001,022 |
| | 3,478,883 |
| 1,980,779 |
| | 1,798,683 |
| | 1,824,571 |
| | 2,546,691 |
| | 2,806,358 |
|
| % of net sales | 37.3 | % | | 46.8 | % | | 49.2 | % | | 49.8 | % | | 53.6 | % | 44.0 | % | | 39.8 | % | | 37.4 | % | | 46.7 | % | | 49.2 | % |
| Operating (loss) income | (342,823 | ) | | 519,233 |
| | 540,922 |
| | 653,714 |
| | 1,168,103 |
| |
| Operating income (loss) | | 39,240 |
| | (234,349 | ) | | (335,698 | ) | | 519,975 |
| | 542,208 |
|
| % of net sales | (7.0 | )% | | 9.5 | % | | 9.5 | % | | 10.9 | % | | 18.0 | % | 0.9 | % | | (5.2 | )% | | (6.9 | )% | | 9.5 | % | | 9.5 | % |
| (Loss) income before income taxes | (504,987 | ) | | 409,742 |
| | 463,915 |
| | 586,910 |
| | 1,099,128 |
| (158,288 | ) | | (417,103 | ) | | (501,245 | ) | | 402,042 |
| | 456,527 |
|
| Provision for income taxes (a) | 548,849 |
| | 91,720 |
| | 94,499 |
| | 88,036 |
| | 195,184 |
| 55,224 |
| | 116,196 |
| | 553,334 |
| | 89,134 |
| | 91,610 |
|
| Net (loss) income | $ | (1,053,836 | ) | | $ | 318,022 |
| | $ | 369,416 |
| | $ | 498,874 |
| | $ | 903,944 |
| $ | (213,512 | ) | | $ | (533,299 | ) | | $ | (1,054,579 | ) | | $ | 312,908 |
| | $ | 364,917 |
|
| Net (Loss) Income Per Common Share—Basic | $ | (3.07 | ) | | $ | 0.93 |
| | $ | 1.08 |
| | $ | 1.46 |
| | $ | 2.61 |
| $ | (0.62 | ) | | $ | (1.55 | ) | | $ | (3.07 | ) | | $ | 0.91 |
| | $ | 1.07 |
|
| Net (Loss) Income Per Common Share—Diluted | $ | (3.07 | ) | | $ | 0.92 |
| | $ | 1.08 |
| | $ | 1.45 |
| | $ | 2.58 |
| $ | (0.62 | ) | | $ | (1.55 | ) | | $ | (3.07 | ) | | $ | 0.91 |
| | $ | 1.06 |
|
| Dividends Declared Per Common Share | $ | 0.91 |
| | $ | 1.52 |
| | $ | 1.52 |
| | $ | 1.52 |
| | $ | 1.44 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.91 |
| | $ | 1.52 |
| | $ | 1.52 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | | | December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2019 | | 2018 (c) | | 2017 (c) | | 2016 (c) | | 2015 (c) |
| | (In thousands) | (In thousands) |
| Financial Position: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total assets | $ | 6,238,503 |
| | $ | 6,493,794 |
| | $ | 6,535,143 |
| | $ | 6,721,983 |
| | $ | 6,439,626 |
| $ | 5,325,226 |
| | $ | 5,238,225 |
| | $ | 6,228,147 |
| | $ | 6,488,381 |
| | $ | 6,530,644 |
|
| Noncurrent liabilities | 3,357,245 |
| | 2,580,439 |
| | 2,256,360 |
| | 2,684,026 |
| | 2,140,627 |
| $ | 3,556,605 |
| | $ | 3,321,392 |
| | $ | 3,357,245 |
| | $ | 2,580,439 |
| | $ | 2,256,360 |
|
| Stockholders’ equity | 1,257,455 |
| | 2,407,782 |
| | 2,633,254 |
| | 2,949,071 |
| | 3,251,559 |
| $ | 491,714 |
| | $ | 666,901 |
| | $ | 1,257,197 |
| | $ | 2,408,267 |
| | $ | 2,638,853 |
|
| |
| (a) | The provision for income taxes in 2017 was negatively impacted by net tax expense of $454.4$457.1 million, primarily related to the establishment of a valuation allowance in the third quarter of 2017 on U.S. deferred tax assets that will likely not be realized and a provisional estimate of the impact of the U.S. Tax ReformAct in the fourth quarter of 2017. The provision |
| |
| (b) | In accordance with Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2017-07, Compensation - Retirement Benefits: Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, prior period amounts have been retrospectively adjusted, which resulted in a reclassification of $3.4 million, $8.4 million, and $8.7 million of expense, net from other selling and administrative expenses to other non-operating expense, net for income taxes in the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016, was positively impacted by net tax benefits of $16.8 million, primarilyand 2015, respectively. |
| |
| (c) | Revised to correct for an adjustment related to reassessmentsthe overstatement of prior years' tax liabilities based on the statusaccrued royalties payable and understatement of auditsretained earnings of $10.1 million as of January 1, 2015 and tax filings in various jurisdictions around the world, settlements, and enacted tax law changes, and the adoption of a new accounting pronouncement. The provision for income taxes in 2015 was positively impacted by net tax benefits of $19.1 million, primarily related to reassessments of prior years' tax liabilities based on the status of audits and tax filings in various jurisdictions around the world, settlements, and enacted tax law changes. The provision for income taxes in 2014 was positively impacted by net tax benefits of $42.6 million, primarily related to reassessments of prior years’ tax liabilities based on the status of audits and tax filings in various jurisdictions around the world, settlements, and enacted tax law changes, partially offset by a tax charge related to a 2014 tax restructuring for the HIT Entertainment and MEGA Brands operations. The provision for income taxes in 2013 was positively impacted by net tax benefits of $32.2 million, primarily related to reassessments of prior years’ tax liabilities based on the status of audits and tax filings in various jurisdictions around the world, settlements, and enacted tax law changes.all subsequent periods presented. |
| |
| Item 7. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes. See Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." Note that amounts within this Item shown in millions may not foot due to rounding.
Mattel has omitted discussion of 2017 results where it would be redundant to the discussion previously included in Part II, Item 7 "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," of Mattel’s Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2018.
The following discussion also includes gross sales and currency exchange rate impact, non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Regulation G"), to supplement the financial results as reported in accordance with GAAP. Gross sales represent sales to customers, excluding the impact of sales adjustments, such as trade discounts and other allowances. The currency exchange rate impact reflects the portion (expressed as a percentage) of changes in Mattel's reported results that are attributable to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Mattel uses these non-GAAP financial measures to analyze its continuing operations and to monitor, assess, and identify meaningful trends in its operating and financial performance. These measures are not, and should not be viewed as, a substitute for GAAP financial measures. Refer to "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more detailed discussion, including a reconciliation of gross sales, a non-GAAP financial measure, to net sales, its most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
Overview
Mattel is a leading global children's entertainment company that specializes in the design and production of quality toys and consumer products. Mattel's visionproducts are among the most widely recognized toy products in the world. Mattel's mission is to "inspire the wonder of childhood as the global leader in learning"create innovative products and developmentexperiences that inspire, entertain, and develop children through play." In order to deliver on this vision,mission, Mattel is focused on the following five-pillar strategy:two-part strategy to transform Mattel from a toy manufacturing company into an intellectual property ("IP") driven, high-performing toy company:
| |
| • | In the short- to mid-term, restore profitability by reshaping operations and regain topline growth by growing Mattel's Power Brands (Barbie, Hot Wheels, Fisher-Price and Thomas & Friends, and American Girl) and expanding Mattel's brand portfolio. |
BuildIn the mid- to long-term, capture the full value of Mattel's Power Brands (American Girl, Barbie, Fisher-Price, Hot Wheels,IP through franchise management and Thomas & Friends) into connected 360-degree play systemsthe development of Mattel's online retail and experiences;
Accelerate emerging markets growth with digital-first solutions;
Focus and strengthen Mattel's innovation pipeline;
Reshape Mattel's operations to enable this strategy - leaner, faster, and smarter - via commercial realignment, supply chain transformation, and IT transformation; and
Reignite Mattel's culture and team.
2017 Overview
Mattel’s 2017 financial highlights include the following:
Net sales in 2017 were $4.88 billion, an 11% decrease, as compared to 2016 net sales of $5.46 billion.
Gross sales in 2017 were $5.51 billion, a 9% decrease, as compared to 2016 gross sales of $6.07 billion.
Gross margin in 2017 was 37.3%, a decrease of 950 basis points from 2016.
Operating loss in 2017 was $342.8 million, as compared to operating income of $519.2 million in 2016.
Diluted net loss per share in 2017 was $3.07, as compared to diluted earnings per share of $0.92 in 2016.e-commerce capabilities.
ResultsReorganization of OperationsGross Sales by Categories and Brand in 2019
2017 ComparedAlthough there were no changes to 2016
Consolidated Results
NetMattel's commercial operations that impacted its operating segments, in the first quarter of 2019, Mattel modified its reporting structure for revenues, as outlined below, and reorganized its regional sales for 2017 were $4.88 billion, an 11% decrease, as comparedreporting structure within the International segment. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to $5.46 billion in 2016. Net loss for 2017 was $1.05 billion, or a loss of $3.07 per diluted share, as compared to net income of $318.0 million, or earnings of $0.92 per diluted share, in 2016. The net loss for 2017 was impacted by lower gross profit, a higher advertising rate, higher other selling and administrative expenses, higher interest expense, a $59.0 million non-operating expense relatedconform to the discontinuation of Mattel's Venezuelan subsidiary,current period presentation. Gross sales by categories are presented as follows:
Dolls—including brands such as Barbie,American Girl, Enchantimals,and Polly Pocket.
Infant, Toddler, and a net tax expense of $454.4 million primarily related to the establishment of a valuation allowance on U.S. deferred tax assets that will likely not be realizedPreschool—including brands such as Fisher-Price and an estimate of the impact of U.S. Tax Reform.Thomas & Friends, Power Wheels, Fireman Sam, and Shimmer and Shine (Nickelodeon).
Vehicles—including brands such as Hot Wheels, Matchbox,and CARS (Disney Pixar).
Action Figures, Building Sets, and Games—including brands such as MEGA, UNO, Toy Story (Disney Pixar), Jurassic World (NBCUniversal),and WWE.
The following table provides a summary of Mattel’s consolidated results for 2017 and 2016:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | Year/Year Change |
| | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | |
| | Amount | | % of Net
Sales | | Amount | | % of Net
Sales | | % | | Basis Points
of Net Sales |
| | (In millions, except percentage and basis point information) |
| Net sales | $ | 4,882.0 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 5,456.7 |
| | 100.0 | % | | -11 | % | | — |
|
| Gross profit | $ | 1,820.8 |
| | 37.3 | % | | $ | 2,554.4 |
| | 46.8 | % | | -29 | % | | (950 | ) |
| Advertising and promotion expenses | 642.3 |
| | 13.2 |
| | 634.9 |
| | 11.6 |
| | 1 | % | | 160 |
|
| Other selling and administrative expenses | 1,521.4 |
| | 31.2 |
| | 1,400.3 |
| | 25.7 |
| | 9 | % | | 550 |
|
| Operating (loss) income | (342.8 | ) | | -7.0 |
| | 519.2 |
| | 9.5 |
| | -166 | % | | (1,650 | ) |
| Interest expense | 105.2 |
| | 2.2 |
| | 95.1 |
| | 1.7 |
| | 11 | % | | 50 |
|
| Interest (income) | (7.8 | ) | | -0.2 |
| | (9.1 | ) | | -0.2 |
| | -15 | % | | — |
|
| Other non-operating expense, net | 64.7 |
| | | | 23.5 |
| | | | | | |
| (Loss) income before income taxes | $ | (505.0 | ) | | -10.3 | % | | $ | 409.7 |
| | 7.5 | % | | -223 | % | | (1,780 | ) |
Sales
Net sales for 2017 were $4.88 billion, an 11% decrease, as compared to $5.46 billion in 2016.
The following table provides a summary of Mattel’s consolidated gross sales by categories, along with supplemental information by brand for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, based on Mattel's current reporting structure for revenues:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | % Change as
Reported | | Currency
Exchange Rate
Impact |
| | December 31, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 | |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Revenues by Categories | | | | | | | |
| Dolls | $ | 1,730.9 |
| | $ | 1,725.9 |
| | — | % | | -1 | % |
| Infant, Toddler, and Preschool | 1,417.8 |
| | 1,677.2 |
| | -15 | % | | — | % |
| Vehicles | 1,065.5 |
| | 1,242.8 |
| | -14 | % | | -1 | % |
| Action Figures, Building Sets, and Games | 861.3 |
| | 868.2 |
| | -1 | % | | -1 | % |
| Gross Sales | $ | 5,075.5 |
| | $ | 5,514.1 |
| | -8 | % | | -1 | % |
| Sales Adjustments | (560.7 | ) | | (632.6 | ) | | | | |
| Net Sales | $ | 4,514.8 |
| | $ | 4,881.5 |
| | -8 | % | | -1 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
| Supplemental Revenue Disclosure | | | | | | | |
| Revenues by Top 3 Power Brands | | | | | | | |
| Barbie | $ | 1,089.0 |
| | $ | 954.9 |
| | 14 | % | | -1 | % |
| Hot Wheels | 834.1 |
| | 777.3 |
| | 7 | % | | -2 | % |
| Fisher-Price and Thomas & Friends | 1,185.7 |
| | 1,370.5 |
| | -13 | % | | — | % |
| Other | 1,966.8 |
| | 2,411.3 |
| | -18 | % | | — | % |
| Gross Sales | $ | 5,075.5 |
| | $ | 5,514.1 |
| | -8 | % | | -1 | % |
The following table provides a summary of Mattel's consolidated gross sales by brand results for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, and 2016:as presented in Mattel's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | % Change as
Reported | | Currency
Exchange Rate
Impact |
| | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Mattel Girls & Boys Brands: | | | | | | | |
| Barbie | $ | 954.9 |
| | $ | 971.8 |
| | -2 | % | | 1 | % |
| Other Girls | 297.7 |
| | 461.7 |
| | -36 | % | | 1 | % |
| Wheels | 847.0 |
| | 885.1 |
| | -4 | % | | 1 | % |
| Entertainment | 978.1 |
| | 875.5 |
| | 12 | % | | 1 | % |
| | 3,077.7 |
| | 3,194.1 |
| | -4 | % | | 1 | % |
| Fisher-Price Brands: | | | | | | | |
| Core Fisher-Price | 1,150.2 |
| | 1,262.8 |
| | -9 | % | | 1 | % |
| Fisher-Price Friends | 426.3 |
| | 496.2 |
| | -14 | % | | — | % |
| Other Fisher-Price | 100.7 |
| | 129.1 |
| | -22 | % | | — | % |
| | 1,677.2 |
| | 1,888.1 |
| | -11 | % | | 1 | % |
| American Girl Brands | 451.5 |
| | 570.8 |
| | -21 | % | | — | % |
| Construction and Arts & Crafts Brands | 269.5 |
| | 377.6 |
| | -29 | % | | — | % |
| Other | 38.2 |
| | 43.1 |
| | | | |
| Total Gross Sales | $ | 5,514.1 |
| | $ | 6,073.7 |
| | -9 | % | | 1 | % |
| Sales Adjustments | (632.2 | ) | | (617.0 | ) | | | | |
| Total Net Sales | $ | 4,882.0 |
| | $ | 5,456.7 |
| | -11 | % | | — | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | % Change as
Reported | | Currency
Exchange Rate
Impact |
| | December 31, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 | |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Power Brands | | | | | | | |
| Barbie | $ | 1,089.0 |
| | $ | 954.9 |
| | 14 | % | | -1 | % |
| Hot Wheels | 834.1 |
| | 777.3 |
| | 7 | % | | -2 | % |
| Fisher-Price and Thomas & Friends | 1,185.7 |
| | 1,370.5 |
| | -13 | % | | — | % |
| American Girl | 342.4 |
| | 473.3 |
| | -28 | % | | — | % |
| Total Power Brands | 3,451.1 |
| | 3,576.1 |
| | -3 | % | | -1 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
| Toy Box | | | | | | | |
| Owned Brands | 887.4 |
| | 980.6 |
| | -10 | % | | -2 | % |
| Partner Brands | 737.0 |
| | 957.5 |
| | -23 | % | | -1 | % |
| Total Toy Box | 1,624.4 |
| | 1,938.0 |
| | -16 | % | | -1 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
| Total Gross Sales | 5,075.5 |
| | 5,514.1 |
| | -8 | % | | -1 | % |
| Sales Adjustments | (560.7 | ) | | (632.6 | ) | | | | |
| Total Net Sales | $ | 4,514.8 |
| | $ | 4,881.5 |
| | -8 | % | | -1 | % |
Results of Operations
2019 Compared to 2018
Consolidated Results
Net sales for 2019 were $4.50 billion, as compared to $4.51 billion in 2018. Net loss for 2019 was $213.5 million, or $0.62 loss per share, as compared to a net loss of $533.3 million, or $1.55 loss per share, in 2018, primarily due to higher gross profit and lower selling and administrative expenses. Net loss for 2019 included the impact of approximately $38 million related to the inclined sleeper product recalls, of which approximately $6 million was a reduction to net sales, approximately $22 million was included in cost of sales, and approximately $10 million was included in other selling and administrative expenses. Net loss for 2018 includes a sales reversal of approximately $30 million and bad debt expense, net of approximately $32 million as a result of the Toys "R" Us liquidation.
The following table provides a summary of Mattel’s consolidated results for 2019 and 2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | Year/Year Change |
| | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 | |
| | Amount | | % of Net
Sales | | Amount | | % of Net
Sales | | % | | Basis Points
of Net Sales |
| | (In millions, except percentage and basis point information) |
| Net sales | $ | 4,504.6 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 4,514.8 |
| | 100.0 | % | | — | % | | — |
|
| Gross profit | $ | 1,980.8 |
| | 44.0 | % | | $ | 1,798.7 |
| | 39.8 | % | | 10 | % | | 420 |
|
| Advertising and promotion expenses | 551.5 |
| | 12.2 | % | | 524.3 |
| | 11.6 | % | | 5 | % | | 60 |
|
| Other selling and administrative expenses | 1,390.0 |
| | 30.9 | % | | 1,508.7 |
| | 33.4 | % | | -8 | % | | (250 | ) |
| Operating income (loss) | 39.2 |
| | 0.9 | % | | (234.3 | ) | | -5.2 | % | | n/m |
| | n/m |
|
| Interest expense | 201.0 |
| | 4.5 | % | | 181.9 |
| | 4.0 | % | | 11 | % | | 50 |
|
| Interest (income) | (6.2 | ) | | -0.1 | % | | (6.5 | ) | | -0.1 | % | | -5 | % | | — |
|
| Other non-operating expense, net | 2.6 |
| | | | 7.3 |
| | | |
|
| | |
| Loss before income taxes | $ | (158.3 | ) | | -3.5 | % | | $ | (417.1 | ) | | -9.2 | % | | -62 | % | | 570 |
|
| Provision for income taxes | $ | 55.2 |
| | 1.2 | % | | $ | 116.2 |
| | 2.6 | % | | -52 | % | | (140 | ) |
| Net loss | $ | (213.5 | ) | | -4.7 | % | | $ | (533.3 | ) | | -11.8 | % | | -60 | % | | 710 |
|
n/m - Not Meaningful
Sales
Net sales for 2019 were $4.50 billion as compared to $4.51 billion in 2018.
The following table provides a summary of Mattel’s consolidated gross sales by categories, along with supplemental information by brand for 2019 and 2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | % Change as
Reported | | Currency
Exchange Rate
Impact |
| | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 | |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Revenues by Categories (a) | | | | | | | |
| Dolls | $ | 1,724.0 |
| | $ | 1,730.9 |
| | — | % | | -2 | % |
| Infant, Toddler, and Preschool | 1,257.6 |
| | 1,417.8 |
| | -11 | % | | -1 | % |
| Vehicles | 1,101.3 |
| | 1,065.5 |
| | 3 | % | | -3 | % |
| Action Figures, Building Sets, and Games | 981.6 |
| | 861.3 |
| | 14 | % | | -1 | % |
| Gross Sales | $ | 5,064.6 |
| | $ | 5,075.5 |
| | — | % | | -2 | % |
| Sales Adjustments | (560.0 | ) | | (560.7 | ) | | | | |
| Net Sales | $ | 4,504.6 |
| | $ | 4,514.8 |
| | — | % | | -1 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
| Supplemental Revenue Disclosure | | | | | | | |
| Revenues by Top 3 Power Brands | | | | | | | |
| Barbie | $ | 1,159.8 |
| | $ | 1,089.0 |
| | 7 | % | | -2 | % |
| Hot Wheels | 925.9 |
| | 834.1 |
| | 11 | % | | -3 | % |
| Fisher-Price and Thomas & Friends | 1,131.8 |
| | 1,185.7 |
| | -5 | % | | -2 | % |
| Other | 1,847.2 |
| | 1,966.8 |
| | -6 | % | | -1 | % |
| Gross Sales | $ | 5,064.6 |
| | $ | 5,075.5 |
| | — | % | | -2 | % |
__________________________________________
(a) Mattel modified its reporting structure for revenues in the first quarter of 2019 to disclose revenues by categories.
Gross sales were $5.51$5.06 billion in 2017, a decrease of $559.6 million, or 9%,2019, as compared to $6.07$5.08 billion in 2016,2018, with a favorablean unfavorable impact from changes in currency exchange rates of 12 percentage point.points. Gross sales in 2018 included the Toys "R" Us sales reversal of approximately $30 million. The decrease in gross sales was primarily due to lower sales of Other Girls, ConstructionInfant, Toddler, and Arts & Crafts, American Girl, and Fisher-Price Friends products, partiallyPreschool, substantially offset by higher sales of Entertainment products. TheAction Figures, Building Sets, and Games.
Gross sales of Dolls remained flat year-over-year, with declines of American Girl products, primarily driven by lower sales in proprietary retail and direct channels, substantially offset by higher sales of Barbie products, primarily driven by strong brand POS momentum in concert with Barbie’s 60th anniversary.
Of the 11% decrease in Infant, Toddler, and Preschool gross sales, was partially a result of the reversal of approximately $47 million of gross sales related to Toys "R" Us filing for bankruptcy. In addition, Mattel began to reduce shipping to Toys "R" Us in early September, which resulted in a loss of revenue in the second half of 2017. Of the 36% decrease in Other Girls gross sales, 28%5% was due to lower sales of Monster HighFisher-Price Friends products, 12%primarily driven by the rationalization of licensing partnerships, and 4% was due to lower sales of Ever After High products,Fisher-Price and 11% was due to lower sales of DC Super Hero Girls products, partially offset by initial sales of Enchantimals products of 11%. Of the 29% decrease in Construction and Arts & Crafts gross sales, 26% was due to lower sales of MEGA BLOKS products, primarily driven by licensed properties and MEGA BLOKS Preschool products. The 21% decrease in American Girl gross sales was due to lower sales across channels. Of the 14% decrease in Fisher-Price Friends gross sales, 13% was due to lower sales of Thomas & Friends products.
Of the 12%3% increase in EntertainmentVehicles gross sales, 30%8% was due to higher sales of CARSHot Wheels products, primarily due to higher sales of diecast cars, and tracks and playsets products, partially offset by lower sales of MinecraftCARS products of 5%, lower sales of DC Comics products of 4%,3% and lower sales of Dinotrux and WWEJurassic World products of 2% each.1% following their movie launches in prior years.
Of the 14% increase in Action Figures, Building Sets, and Games gross sales, 22% was due to initial sales of Toy Story 4 products coinciding with its 2019 theatrical release, partially offset by lower sales of Jurassic World products of 8% following the movie launch in the prior year.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was 62.7%56.0% in 2017,2019, as compared to 53.2%60.2% in 2016.2018. Cost of sales increasedin 2019 included the impact of approximately $22 million related to the inclined sleeper product recalls. Cost of sales decreased by $158.9$192.3 million, or 5%7%, to $3.06$2.52 billion in 20172019 from $2.90$2.72 billion in 2016,2018, as compared to a 11% decrease inflat net sales. Within cost of sales, product and other costs increaseddecreased by $92.4$149.8 million, or 4%7%, to $2.44$2.00 billion in 20172019 from $2.35$2.15 billion in 2016, primarily as a result of higher obsolescence expense;2018; freight and logistics expenses increaseddecreased by $50.9$38.8 million, or 16%11%, to $373.6$305.4 million in 20172019 from $322.7$344.2 million in 2016;2018; and royalty expenses increased $15.6expense decreased by $3.7 million, or 7%2%, to $244.5$220.2 million in 20172019 from $228.9$224.0 million in 2016.2018.
Gross Margin
Gross margin decreasedincreased to 37.3%44.0% in 20172019 from 46.8%39.8% in 2016.2018. Gross margin in 2019 included the impact of approximately $28 million related to the inclined sleeper product recalls. The decreaseincrease in gross margin was primarily driven by incremental Structural Simplification savings, partially offset by input cost inflation due to higher obsolescence expense, unfavorable product mix, higher freight and logistics expenses, asset impairments, and an unfavorable impact from Toys "R" Us filing for bankruptcy in the third quarter of 2017. As a result of the Toys "R" Us net sales reversal, gross margin includes the cost of sales for the inventory sold, but excludes the corresponding net sales.plant labor costs.
Advertising and Promotion Expenses
Advertising and promotion expenses primarily consist of: (i) media costs, which primarily include the media, planning, and buying fees for television, print, and online advertisements, (ii) non-media costs, which primarily include commercial and website production, merchandising, and promotional costs, (iii) retail advertising costs, which primarily include consumer direct catalogs, newspaper inserts, fliers, and mailers, and (iv) generic advertising costs, which primarily include trade show costs. Advertising and promotion expenses as a percentage of net sales increased to 13.2%12.2% in 20172019 from 11.6% in 2016,2018, primarily as a result of lower net sales and higher non-media costs.driven by strategic advertising investments in the fourth quarter.
Other Selling and Administrative Expenses
Other selling and administrative expenses were $1.52$1.39 billion, or 31.2%30.9% of net sales, in 2017,2019, as compared to $1.40$1.51 billion, or 25.7%33.4% of net sales, in 2016.2018. The increasedecrease in other selling and administrative expenses was primarily driven by incremental Structural Simplification savings, lower severance and other restructuring charges, and a benefit from the absence of the 2018 Toys "R" Us bad debt expense of approximately $32 million. This was partially offset by higher incentive compensation expense due to asset impairmentsimproved business performance, a $25.9 million impairment charge related to certain American Girl retail store assets, as a result of lower fourth quarter sales in certain retail stores, and the impact of the inclined sleeper product recalls of approximately $36$10 million.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $201.0 million higher severance and restructuring expenses of approximately $25in 2019, as compared to $181.9 million higher employee-relatedin 2018. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to debt extinguishment costs of approximately $19$9.2 million higher incentive and equity compensation of approximately $16 million, and costs associated with the new American Girl flagship store in New York Cityearly redemption of approximately $14 million.
Other Non-Operating Expense
Other non-operating expense was $64.7 million in 2017, as compared to $23.5 million in 2016. In the fourth quarter of 2017, Mattel initiated actions to discontinue operations in Venezuela, which resulted in a $59.0 million loss in other non-operating expense related to2010 Senior Notes due October 1, 2020 and the 2016 Senior Notes due August 12, 2021, and higher interest rates associated cumulative translation adjustments. In 2016, Mattel recognized approximately $26 million of foreign currency exchange loss related to a change inwith the remeasurement rate used by Mattel's Venezuelan subsidiary. See Item 7A "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Venezuelan Operations" for more information.
2019 Senior Notes.
Provision for Income Taxes
Mattel’s provision for income taxes was $548.8$55.2 million in 2017, compared to $91.7 million in 2016. Mattel's effective tax rate on loss before income taxes was (108.7)% in 2017,2019, as compared to an effective tax rate on income before income taxes of 22.4%$116.2 million in 2016.2018. The 20172019 income tax provision included neta $13.4 million tax expense of $454.4 million, primarilybenefit related to the establishmentrelease of valuation allowances in certain foreign tax jurisdictions, and a valuation allowance in the third quarter of 2017 on U.S. deferred tax assets that will likely not be realized and an estimate of the impact of U.S. Tax Reform in the fourth quarter of 2017. The 2017 net tax expense included a provisional income$16.9 million tax benefit of $105.3 million related to the remeasurement of the U.S. net deferred tax liabilities from 35% to 21% tax rate and revised deferred tax netting from the third quarter of 2017 to the fourth quarter of 2017. Mattel has not yet determined a reasonable estimate of the impact of many aspects of tax reform. For additional information on the U.S. Tax Reform, see Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Income Taxes". The 2016 income tax provision included net tax benefits of $16.8 million primarily related to reassessments of prior years'year’s tax liabilities based on the status of audits and tax filingssettlements in various jurisdictions aroundjurisdictions. The 2018 income tax provision included a $14.6 million expense related to changes to its indefinite reinvestment assertion and a $3.7 million expense related to the world, settlements, and enacted tax law changes, and the adoptiondeemed repatriation of ASU 2016-09.accumulated foreign earnings (net of related valuation allowance change).
Segment Results
North America Segment
Net sales for the North America segment were $2.28 billion in 2019, an increase of $3.0 million as compared to $2.27 billion in 2018.
The following table provides a summary of Mattel’s gross sales by brand for the North America segment by categories, along with supplemental information by brand, for 20172019 and 2016:2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | % Change as
Reported | | Currency
Exchange Rate
Impact |
| | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Mattel Girls & Boys Brands: | | | | | | | |
| Barbie | $ | 450.9 |
| | $ | 489.1 |
| | -8 | % | | — | % |
| Other Girls | 101.5 |
| | 219.6 |
| | -54 | % | | — | % |
| Wheels | 381.7 |
| | 446.0 |
| | -14 | % | | 1 | % |
| Entertainment | 489.9 |
| | 496.8 |
| | -1 | % | | — | % |
| | 1,424.0 |
| | 1,651.5 |
| | -14 | % | | — | % |
| Fisher-Price Brands: | | | | | | | |
| Core Fisher-Price | 637.9 |
| | 740.9 |
| | -14 | % | | — | % |
| Fisher-Price Friends | 195.7 |
| | 249.5 |
| | -22 | % | | -1 | % |
| Other Fisher-Price | 95.2 |
| | 121.5 |
| | -22 | % | | — | % |
| | 928.8 |
| | 1,111.9 |
| | -16 | % | | 1 | % |
| Construction and Arts & Crafts Brands | 167.5 |
| | 253.4 |
| | -34 | % | | — | % |
| Other | 16.3 |
| | 19.4 |
| | | | |
| Total Gross Sales | $ | 2,536.7 |
| | $ | 3,036.2 |
| | -16 | % | | 1 | % |
| Sales Adjustments | (162.8 | ) | | (198.4 | ) | | | | |
| Total Net Sales | $ | 2,373.9 |
| | $ | 2,837.8 |
| | -16 | % | | — | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | % Change as
Reported | | Currency
Exchange Rate
Impact |
| | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 | |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Revenues by Categories (a) | | | | | | | |
| Dolls | $ | 636.2 |
| | $ | 624.7 |
| | 2 | % | | — | % |
| Infant, Toddler, and Preschool | 730.3 |
| | 808.2 |
| | -10 | % | | — | % |
| Vehicles | 510.8 |
| | 488.6 |
| | 5 | % | | — | % |
| Action Figures, Building Sets, and Games | 555.0 |
| | 500.6 |
| | 11 | % | | — | % |
| Gross Sales | $ | 2,432.3 |
| | $ | 2,422.1 |
| | — | % | | -1 | % |
| Sales Adjustments | (156.5 | ) | | (149.3 | ) | | | | |
| Net Sales | $ | 2,275.8 |
| | $ | 2,272.8 |
| | — | % | | — | % |
| | | | | | | | |
| Supplemental Revenue Disclosure | | | | | | | |
| Revenues by Top 3 Power Brands | | | | | | | |
| Barbie | $ | 558.3 |
| | $ | 535.7 |
| | 4 | % | | — | % |
| Hot Wheels | 419.0 |
| | 380.2 |
| | 10 | % | | — | % |
| Fisher-Price and Thomas & Friends | 650.7 |
| | 665.9 |
| | -2 | % | | — | % |
| Other | 804.2 |
| | 840.3 |
| | -4 | % | | — | % |
| Gross Sales | $ | 2,432.3 |
| | $ | 2,422.1 |
| | — | % | | -1 | % |
__________________________________________
(a) Mattel modified its reporting structure for revenues in the first quarter of 2019 to disclose revenues by categories.
Gross sales for the North America segment were $2.54$2.43 billion in 2017, a decrease2019, an increase of $499.5$10.2 million, or 16%, as compared to $3.04$2.42 billion in 2016,2018, with a favorablean unfavorable impact from changes in currency exchange rates of 1 percentage point. Gross sales in 2018 included the Toys "R" Us sales reversal of approximately $27 million. The decreaseincrease in the North America segment gross sales was primarily due to higher sales of Action Figures, Building Sets, and Games, as well as Vehicles, and Dolls, substantially offset by lower sales of Other Girls, ConstructionInfant, Toddler, and Arts & Crafts, Fisher-Price Friends, Core Fisher-Price, and Wheels products. As a result of Toys "R" Us filing for bankruptcy, Mattel reversed approximately $47 million ofPreschool.
Of the 2% increase in Dolls gross sales, in the third quarter of 2017. In addition, Mattel began to reduce shipping to Toys "R" Us in early September, which resulted in a loss of revenue in the second half of 2017. Of the 54% decrease in Other Girls gross sales, 36%4% was due to higher sales of Barbie products, partially offset by lower sales of Monster HighEnchantimals products and 17% was due to lower sales of DC Super Hero Girls products. 2%.
Of the 34%10% decrease in ConstructionInfant, Toddler, and Arts & CraftsPreschool gross sales, 31% was due to lower sales of MEGA BLOKS products, primarily driven by licensed properties and MEGA BLOKS Preschool products. Of the 22% decrease in Fisher-Price Friends gross sales, 16% was due to lower sales of Thomas & Friends products and 5% was due to lower sales of Blaze and The Monster Machines products. OfFisher-Price Friends products, primarily driven by the 14% decrease in Core Fisher-Price gross sales, 7%rationalization of licensing partnerships, 2% was due to lower sales of infantPower Wheels products, and 4%2% was due to lower sales of ImaginextFisher-Price and Thomas & Friends products.
Of the 14% decrease5% increase in WheelsVehicles gross sales, 9% was due to higher sales of Hot Wheels products, primarily due to higher sales of diecast cars, and tracks and playsets products, partially offset by lower sales of Hot WheelsJurassic World products of 2% andlower sales of CARS products of 2% following their movie launches in prior years.
Of the 11% increase in Action Figures, Building Sets, and Games gross sales, 20% was due to initial sales of Toy Story 4 products coinciding with its 2019 theatrical release and 4% was due to higher sales of MEGA products, partially offset by lower sales of Matchbox products.Jurassic World products of 10% following the movie launch in the prior year.
Cost of sales decreased 2%7% in 2017,2019, as compared to a 16% decrease inflat net sales, primarily due to lower product and other costs and lower freight and logistics expense. Cost of sales in 2019 included the impact of approximately $21 million related to the inclined sleeper product recalls. Gross margin in 2019 increased primarily due to incremental Structural Simplification savings and a benefit from the absence of the first quarter of 2018 Toys "R" Us sales reversal of approximately $27 million, partially offset by higher freight and logistics expenses. Gross margins in 2017 decreasedinput cost inflation due to higher freightplant labor costs and logistics expenses, an unfavorablethe impact from Toys "R" Us filing for bankruptcy, and higher obsolescence expense. As a result of the Toys "R" Us net sales reversal, gross margin includes the costinclined sleeper product recalls of sales for the inventory sold, but excludes the corresponding net sales.approximately $26 million.
North America segment income decreased by 83% to $98.5was $357.0 million in 2017,2019, as compared to $564.4segment income of $220.8 million in 2016,2018, primarily due to higher gross profit and lower gross profit.other selling and administrative expenses, partially offset by higher advertising and promotion expenses. North America segment income for 2019 included the impact of the inclined sleeper product recalls of approximately $32 million. North America segment income for 2018 included the net sales reversal and bad debt expense, net attributable to the Toy "R" Us liquidation of approximately $48 million.
International Segment
The following table provides a summary of percentage changes in netNet sales withinfor the International segment were $1.97 billion in 2017 versus 2016:
|
| | | | | |
| | % Change in Net Sales as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact |
| Total International Segment | — | % | | 1 | % |
| Europe | -2 | % | | 2 | % |
| Latin America | 3 | % | | 2 | % |
| Asia Pacific | 3 | % | | — | % |
The following table provides a summary2019, an increase of percentage changes$57.0 million as compared to $1.92 billion in gross sales within the International segment in 2017 versus 2016:
|
| | | | | |
| | % Change in Gross Sales as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact |
| Total International Segment | 2 | % | | 2 | % |
| Europe | -1 | % | | 2 | % |
| Latin America | 6 | % | | 2 | % |
| Asia Pacific | 6 | % | | 1 | % |
2018.
The following table provides a summary of Mattel’s gross sales by brand for the International segment by categories, along with supplemental brand information, for 20172019 and 2016:2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | % Change as
Reported | | Currency
Exchange Rate
Impact |
| | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Mattel Girls & Boys Brands: | | | | | | | |
| Barbie | $ | 504.0 |
| | $ | 482.7 |
| | 4 | % | | 2 | % |
| Other Girls | 196.2 |
| | 242.1 |
| | -19 | % | | 2 | % |
| Wheels | 465.4 |
| | 439.1 |
| | 6 | % | | 2 | % |
| Entertainment | 488.2 |
| | 378.7 |
| | 29 | % | | 3 | % |
| | 1,653.7 |
| | 1,542.6 |
| | 7 | % | | 2 | % |
| Fisher-Price Brands: | | | | | | | |
| Core Fisher-Price | 512.3 |
| | 521.9 |
| | -2 | % | | 1 | % |
| Fisher-Price Friends | 230.6 |
| | 246.7 |
| | -6 | % | | 1 | % |
| Other Fisher-Price | 5.5 |
| | 7.6 |
| | -29 | % | | 2 | % |
| | 748.4 |
| | 776.2 |
| | -4 | % | | 1 | % |
| American Girl Brands | 0.1 |
| | 2.5 |
| | | | |
| Construction and Arts & Crafts Brands | 101.3 |
| | 124.0 |
| | -18 | % | | 2 | % |
| Other | — |
| | 2.3 |
| | | | |
| Total Gross Sales | $ | 2,503.5 |
| | $ | 2,447.6 |
| | 2 | % | | 2 | % |
| Sales Adjustments | (442.7 | ) | | (392.8 | ) | | | | |
| Total Net Sales | $ | 2,060.8 |
| | $ | 2,054.8 |
| | — | % | | 1 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | % Change as
Reported | | Currency
Exchange Rate
Impact |
| | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 | |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Revenues by Categories (a) | | | | | | | |
| Dolls | $ | 819.4 |
| | $ | 765.6 |
| | 7 | % | | -5 | % |
| Infant, Toddler, and Preschool | 527.3 |
| | 609.6 |
| | -13 | % | | -3 | % |
| Vehicles | 590.5 |
| | 576.9 |
| | 2 | % | | -5 | % |
| Action Figures, Building Sets, and Games | 426.5 |
| | 360.2 |
| | 18 | % | | -4 | % |
| Gross Sales | $ | 2,363.8 |
| | $ | 2,312.2 |
| | 2 | % | | -4 | % |
| Sales Adjustments | (391.6 | ) | | (397.1 | ) | | | | |
| Net Sales | $ | 1,972.2 |
| | $ | 1,915.2 |
| | 3 | % | | -4 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
| Supplemental Revenue Disclosure | | | | | | | |
| Revenues by Top 3 Power Brands | | | | | | | |
| Barbie | $ | 601.4 |
| | $ | 553.2 |
| | 9 | % | | -5 | % |
| Hot Wheels | 506.9 |
| | 453.9 |
| | 12 | % | | -5 | % |
| Fisher-Price and Thomas & Friends | 481.0 |
| | 519.8 |
| | -7 | % | | -3 | % |
| Other | 774.5 |
| | 785.4 |
| | -1 | % | | -3 | % |
| Gross Sales | $ | 2,363.8 |
| | $ | 2,312.2 |
| | 2 | % | | -4 | % |
__________________________________________
(a) Mattel modified its reporting structure for revenues in the first quarter of 2019 to disclose revenues by categories.
Gross sales for the International segment were $2.50$2.36 billion in 2017,2019, an increase of $55.9$51.6 million, or 2%, as compared to $2.45$2.31 billion in 2016,2018, with a favorablean unfavorable impact from changes in currency exchange rates of 24 percentage points. The increase in the International segment gross sales was primarily due to higher sales of EntertainmentAction Figures, Building Sets, and Games, as well as Dolls, and Vehicles, partially offset by lower sales of Infant, Toddler, and Preschool.
Of the 7% increase in Dolls gross sales, 6% was due to higher sales of Barbie products, primarily driven by strong brand POS momentum in concert with Barbie’s 60th anniversary, and 2% was due to higher sales of Polly Pocket products.
Of the 13% decrease in Infant, Toddler, and Preschool gross sales, 6% was due to lower sales of Fisher-Price and Thomas & Friends products and 5% was due to lower sales of Fisher-Price Friends products.
Of the 2% increase in Vehicles gross sales, 8% was due to higher sales of Hot Wheels products, partially offset by lower sales of Other GirlsCARS products of 4% and Construction and Arts & Crafts products. lower sales of Jurassic World products of 1% following their movie launches in prior years.
Of the 29%18% increase in EntertainmentAction Figures, Building Sets, and Games gross sales, 42%23% was due to higherinitial sales of CARSToy Story 4 products coinciding with its 2019 theatrical release, partially offset by lower sales of DC ComicsJurassic World products of 3% and lower sales of Minecraft, Max Steel, and WWE products of 2% each. Of5% following the 19% decreasemovie launch in Other Girls gross sales, 22% was due to lower sales of Monster High products and 11% was due to lower sales of Ever After High products, partially offset by initial sales of Enchantimals products of 15%. The 18% decrease in Construction and Arts & Crafts gross sales was due to lower sales of MEGA BLOKS products, primarily driven by licensed properties and MEGA BLOKS Preschool products.the prior year.
Cost of sales increased 9%decreased 5% in 2017,2019, as compared to flata 3% increase in net sales, primarily due to higherlower product and other costscosts. Gross margin in 2019 increased primarily due to incremental Structural Simplification savings and price increases, partially offset by input cost inflation due to higher royalty expenses. Gross margins in 2017 decreased as a result of unfavorable product mix and higher royalty expense.plant labor costs.
International segment lossincome was $5.9$166.9 million in 2017,2019, as compared to a segment income of $291.2$13.9 million in 2016,2018, primarily due to lowerhigher gross profit and higherlower other selling and administrative expenses.
American Girl Segment
Net sales for the American Girl segment were $256.6 million in 2019, a decrease of $70.2 million as compared to $326.8 million in 2018.
The following table provides a summary of Mattel’s gross sales by brand for the American Girl segment for 20172019 and 2016:2018:
| | | | For the Year Ended | | % Change as
Reported | | Currency
Exchange Rate
Impact | For the Year Ended | | % Change as
Reported | | Currency
Exchange Rate
Impact |
| | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 | |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| American Girl Segment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| American Girl Brands | $ | 451.4 |
| | $ | 568.3 |
| | -21 | % | | — | % | |
| Construction and Arts & Crafts Brands | 0.8 |
| | 0.2 |
| | | | | |
| Other | 21.8 |
| | 21.4 |
| | 2 | % | | 3 | % | |
| Total Gross Sales | $ | 473.9 |
| | $ | 589.9 |
| | -20 | % | | — | % | $ | 268.5 |
| | $ | 341.2 |
| | -21 | % | | — | % |
| Sales Adjustments | (26.7 | ) | | (25.8 | ) | | | | | (11.9 | ) | | (14.4 | ) | | | | |
| Total Net Sales | $ | 447.2 |
| | $ | 564.1 |
| | -21 | % | | — | % | $ | 256.6 |
| | $ | 326.8 |
| | -21 | % | | — | % |
Gross sales for the American Girl segment were $473.9$268.5 million in 2017,2019, a decrease of $116.0$72.7 million, or 20%21%, as compared to $589.9$341.2 million in 2016.2018. The decrease in American Girl segment gross sales was primarily due to lower sales of American Girl brands products as a result of lower sales acrossin proprietary retail and direct channels.
Cost of sales increased 14%decreased 23% in 2017,2019, as compared to a 21% decrease in net sales, primarily due to higher inventory obsolescence expense.lower product and other costs. Gross marginsmargin in 2017 decreased as a result of higher2019 increased primarily due to incremental Structural Simplification savings, lower obsolescence expense, unfavorablefavorable product mix, lower licensing income, andpartially offset by higher freight and logistics expenses.expense, the unfavorable impact of fixed cost absorption due to lower sales, and input cost inflation due to higher plant labor costs.
American Girl segment loss was $73.0$58.8 million in 2017,2019, as compared to segment incomeloss of $106.4$17.7 million in 2016,2018, driven primarily due to lower gross profit and higher other selling and administrative expenses.
2016 Compared to 2015
Consolidated Results
Net sales for 2016 were $5.46 billion, a 4% decrease, as compared to $5.70 billion in 2015, with an unfavorable impact from changes in currency exchange rates of 2 percentage points. Net income for 2016 was $318.0 million, or $0.92 per diluted share, as compared to net income of $369.4 million, or $1.08 per diluted share, in 2015. Net income for 2016 was negatively impacted by lower gross profit, partially offset by lower other selling and administrative expenses and lower advertising and promotion expenses.
The following table provides a summary of Mattel’s consolidated results for 2016 and 2015:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | Year/Year Change |
| | December 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 | |
| | Amount | | % of Net
Sales | | Amount | | % of Net
Sales | | % | | Basis Points
of Net Sales |
| | (In millions, except percentage and basis point information) |
| Net sales | $ | 5,456.7 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 5,702.6 |
| | 100.0 | % | | -4 | % | | — |
|
| Gross profit | $ | 2,554.4 |
| | 46.8 | % | | $ | 2,806.4 |
| | 49.2 | % | | -9 | % | | (240 | ) |
| Advertising and promotion expenses | 634.9 |
| | 11.6 |
| | 717.9 |
| | 12.6 |
| | -12 | % | | (100 | ) |
| Other selling and administrative expenses | 1,400.3 |
| | 25.7 |
| | 1,547.6 |
| | 27.1 |
| | -10 | % | | (140 | ) |
| Operating income | 519.2 |
| | 9.5 |
| | 540.9 |
| | 9.5 |
| | -4 | % | | — |
|
| Interest expense | 95.1 |
| | 1.7 |
| | 85.3 |
| | 1.5 |
| | 12 | % | | 20 |
|
| Interest (income) | (9.1 | ) | | -0.2 |
| | (7.2 | ) | | -0.1 |
| | 26 | % | | (10 | ) |
| Other non-operating expense (income), net | 23.5 |
| | | | (1.1 | ) | | | | | | |
| Income before income taxes | $ | 409.7 |
| | 7.5 | % | | $ | 463.9 |
| | 8.1 | % | | -12 | % | | (60 | ) |
Sales
Net sales for 2016 were $5.46 billion, a 4% decrease, as compared to $5.70 billion in 2015, with an unfavorable impact from changes in currency exchange rates of 2 percentage points.
The following table provides a summary of Mattel’s consolidated gross sales by brand for 2016 and 2015:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | % Change as
Reported | | Currency
Exchange Rate
Impact |
| | December 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 | |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Mattel Girls & Boys Brands: | | | | | | | |
| Barbie | $ | 971.8 |
| | $ | 905.9 |
| | 7 | % | | -2 | % |
| Other Girls | 461.7 |
| | 954.4 |
| | -52 | % | | -5 | % |
| Wheels | 885.1 |
| | 831.3 |
| | 6 | % | | -5 | % |
| Entertainment | 875.5 |
| | 772.6 |
| | 13 | % | | -3 | % |
| | 3,194.1 |
| | 3,464.2 |
| | -8 | % | | -3 | % |
| Fisher-Price Brands: | | | | | | | |
| Core Fisher-Price | 1,262.8 |
| | 1,224.1 |
| | 3 | % | | -3 | % |
| Fisher-Price Friends | 496.2 |
| | 503.1 |
| | -1 | % | | -5 | % |
| Other Fisher-Price | 129.1 |
| | 125.0 |
| | 3 | % | | -2 | % |
| | 1,888.1 |
| | 1,852.2 |
| | 2 | % | | -4 | % |
| American Girl Brands | 570.8 |
| | 572.0 |
| | — | % | | — | % |
| Construction and Arts & Crafts Brands | 377.6 |
| | 351.7 |
| | 7 | % | | -8 | % |
| Other | 43.1 |
| | 43.5 |
| | | | |
| Total Gross Sales | $ | 6,073.7 |
| | $ | 6,283.6 |
| | -3 | % | | -3 | % |
| Sales Adjustments | (617.0 | ) | | (581.0 | ) | | | | |
| Total Net Sales | $ | 5,456.7 |
| | $ | 5,702.6 |
| | -4 | % | | -2 | % |
Gross sales were $6.07 billion in 2016, a decrease of $209.9 million or 3%, as compared to $6.28 billion in 2015, with an unfavorable impact from changes in currency exchange rates of 3 percentage points. The decrease in gross sales was due to lower sales of Other Girls products, partially offset by higher sales of Entertainment products. Of the 52% decrease in Other Girls gross sales, 47% was due to lower sales of Disney Princess products. Of the 13% increase in Entertainment gross sales, 12% was due to higher sales of DC Comics products.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was 53.2% in 2016, as comparedand a $25.9 million impairment charge related to 50.8% in 2015. Cost of sales in 2016 was flat with 2015 at $2.90 billion, as compared to a 4% decrease in net sales. Within cost of sales, product and other costs increased by $52.4 million, or 2%, to $2.35 billion in 2016 from $2.30 billion in 2015; royalty expenses decreased $35.7 million, or 13%, to $228.9 million in 2016 from $264.6 million in 2015; and freight and logistics expenses decreased by $10.7 million, or 3%, to $322.7 million in 2016 from $333.4 million in 2015.
Gross Margin
Gross margin decreased to 46.8% in 2016 from 49.2% in 2015. The decrease in gross margin was primarily due to unfavorable foreign exchange, higher sales adjustments, and higher input costs, partially offset by strategic pricing and Funding Our Future savings.
Advertising and Promotion Expenses
Advertising and promotion expenses primarily consist of: (i) media costs, which primarily include the media, planning, and buying fees for television, print, and online advertisements, (ii) non-media costs, which primarily include commercial and website production, merchandising, and promotional costs, (iii) certain American Girl retail advertising costs, which primarily include consumer direct catalogs, newspaper inserts, fliers, and mailers and (iv) generic advertising costs, which primarily include trade show costs. Advertising and promotion expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased to 11.6% in 2016 from 12.6% in 2015, primarilystore assets, as a result of lower media and non-media costs.
Other Selling and Administrative Expenses
Other selling and administrative expenses were $1.40 billion, or 25.7% of netfourth quarter sales in 2016, as compared to $1.55 billion, or 27.1% of net sales, in 2015. The decrease in other selling and administrative expenses was primarily due to Funding Our Future net savings of approximately $60 million, lower incentive and equity compensation of approximately $36 million, and lower severance and restructuring charges of approximately $32 million.
Other Non-Operating Expense/Income, Net
Other non-operating expense was $23.5 million in 2016, as compared to other non-operating income of $1.1 million in 2015. The increase in other non-operating expense was primarily due to the change in the remeasurement rate used by Mattel's Venezuelan subsidiary, which resulted in an unrealized foreign currency exchange loss of approximately $26 million, in the first quarter of 2016.
Provision for Income Taxes
Mattel’s provision for income taxes was $91.7 million in 2016, compared to $94.5 million in 2015. Mattel's effective tax rate on income before income taxes in 2016 was 22.4%, as compared to 20.4% in 2015. The 2016 income tax provision included net tax benefits of $16.8 million primarily related to reassessments of prior years' tax liabilities based on the status of audits and tax filings in various jurisdictions around the world, settlements, and enacted tax law changes, and the adoption of a new accounting pronouncement. The 2015 income tax provision included net tax benefits of $19.1 million primarily related to reassessments of prior years' tax liabilities based on the status of audits and tax filings in various jurisdictions around the world, settlements, and enacted tax law changes.
North America Segment
The following table provides a summary of Mattel’s gross sales by brand for the North America segment for 2016 and 2015:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | % Change as
Reported | | Currency
Exchange Rate
Impact |
| | December 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 | |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Mattel Girls & Boys Brands: | | | | | | | |
| Barbie | $ | 489.1 |
| | $ | 433.9 |
| | 13 | % | | — | % |
| Other Girls | 219.6 |
| | 443.9 |
| | -51 | % | | -1 | % |
| Wheels | 446.0 |
| | 409.9 |
| | 9 | % | | — | % |
| Entertainment | 496.8 |
| | 417.4 |
| | 19 | % | | — | % |
| | 1,651.5 |
| | 1,705.1 |
| | -3 | % | | — | % |
| Fisher-Price Brands: | | | | | | | |
| Core Fisher-Price | 740.9 |
| | 734.0 |
| | 1 | % | | — | % |
| Fisher-Price Friends | 249.5 |
| | 263.6 |
| | -5 | % | | — | % |
| Other Fisher-Price | 121.5 |
| | 117.3 |
| | 4 | % | | — | % |
| | 1,111.9 |
| | 1,114.9 |
| | — | % | | — | % |
| Construction and Arts & Crafts Brands | 253.4 |
| | 245.4 |
| | 3 | % | | — | % |
| Other | 19.4 |
| | 18.5 |
| | | | |
| Total Gross Sales | $ | 3,036.2 |
| | $ | 3,083.9 |
| | -2 | % | | -1 | % |
| Sales Adjustments | (198.4 | ) | | (192.8 | ) | | | | |
| Total Net Sales | $ | 2,837.8 |
| | $ | 2,891.1 |
| | -2 | % | | — | % |
Gross sales for the North America segment were $3.04 billion in 2016, a decrease of $47.7 million, or 2%, as compared to $3.08 billion in 2015, with an unfavorable impact from changes in currency exchange rates of 1 percentage point. The decrease in the North America segment gross sales was primarily due to lower sales of Other Girls products, partially offset by higher sales of Entertainment and Barbie products. Of the 51% decrease in Other Girls gross sales, 47% was due to lower sales of Disney Princess products. Of the 19% increase in Entertainment gross sales, 12% was due to higher sales of DC Comics products and 5% was due to initial sales of Fuhu tablets. The 13% increase in Barbie gross sales was due to sales of the Fashionistas and I Can Be product lines, and the new younger girl product line, Barbie Dreamtopia, as well as licensing revenue recorded during the second quarter. Cost of sales decreased 2% in 2016, as compared to a 2% decrease in net sales, primarily due to lower product and other costs and lower royalty expenses. Gross margins in 2016 were flat with 2015.
North America segment income increased by 5% to $564.4 million in 2016, as compared to $538.2 million in 2015, primarily due to lower advertising and promotion expenses, partially offset by lower gross profit.
International Segment
The following table provides a summary of percentage changes in net sales within the International segment in 2016 versus 2015:
|
| | | | | |
| | % Change in Net Sales as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact |
| Total International Segment | -8 | % | | -6 | % |
| Europe | -9 | % | | -6 | % |
| Latin America | -12 | % | | -9 | % |
| Asia Pacific | — | % | | -3 | % |
The following table provides a summary of percentage changes in gross sales within the International segment in 2016 versus 2015:
|
| | | | | |
| | % Change in Gross Sales as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact |
| Total International Segment | -6 | % | | -7 | % |
| Europe | -7 | % | | -7 | % |
| Latin America | -10 | % | | -10 | % |
| Asia Pacific | 3 | % | | -2 | % |
The following table provides a summary of Mattel’s gross sales by brand for the International segment for 2016 and 2015:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | % Change as
Reported | | Currency
Exchange Rate
Impact |
| | December 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 | |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Mattel Girls & Boys Brands: | | | | | | | |
| Barbie | $ | 482.7 |
| | $ | 472.0 |
| | 2 | % | | -5 | % |
| Other Girls | 242.1 |
| | 510.5 |
| | -53 | % | | -8 | % |
| Wheels | 439.1 |
| | 421.4 |
| | 4 | % | | -8 | % |
| Entertainment | 378.7 |
| | 355.2 |
| | 7 | % | | -5 | % |
| | 1,542.6 |
| | 1,759.1 |
| | -12 | % | | -6 | % |
| Fisher-Price Brands: | | | | | | | |
| Core Fisher-Price | 521.9 |
| | 490.1 |
| | 6 | % | | -7 | % |
| Fisher-Price Friends | 246.7 |
| | 239.5 |
| | 3 | % | | -9 | % |
| Other Fisher-Price | 7.6 |
| | 7.7 |
| | -1 | % | | -16 | % |
| | 776.2 |
| | 737.3 |
| | 5 | % | | -7 | % |
| American Girl Brands | 2.5 |
| | — |
| | | | |
| Construction and Arts & Crafts Brands | 124.0 |
| | 106.3 |
| | 17 | % | | -20 | % |
| Other | 2.3 |
| | 0.8 |
| | | | |
| Total Gross Sales | $ | 2,447.6 |
| | $ | 2,603.5 |
| | -6 | % | | -7 | % |
| Sales Adjustments | (392.8 | ) | | (362.0 | ) | | | | |
| Total Net Sales | $ | 2,054.8 |
| | $ | 2,241.5 |
| | -8 | % | | -6 | % |
Gross sales for the International segment were $2.45 billion in 2016, a decrease of $155.9 million, or 6%, as compared to $2.60 billion in 2015, with an unfavorable impact from changes in currency exchange rates of 7 percentage points. The decrease in the International segment gross sales was primarily due to lower sales of Other Girls products, partially offset by higher sales of Construction and Arts & Crafts Brands products. Of the 53% decrease in Other Girls gross sales, 47% was due to lower sales of Disney Princess products. Of the 17% increase in Construction and Arts & Crafts gross sales, 14% was due to initial sales of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles MEGA BLOKS products. Cost of sales increased 4% in 2016, as compared to an 8% decrease in net sales, primarily due to higher product and other costs, partially offset by lower royalty expenses. Gross margins in 2016 decreased as a result of unfavorable foreign currency exchange rates, higher input costs, and higher sales adjustments, partially offset by strategic pricing and Funding Our Future savings.
International segment income decreased by 9% to $291.2 million in 2016, as compared to $321.1 million in 2015, primarily due to lower gross profit, partially offset by lower advertising and promotion expenses and lower other selling and administrative expenses.
American Girl Segment
The following table provides a summary of Mattel’s gross sales by brand for the American Girl segment for 2016 and 2015:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | % Change as
Reported | | Currency
Exchange Rate
Impact |
| | December 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 | |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| American Girl Segment: | | | | | | | |
| American Girl Brands | $ | 568.3 |
| | $ | 572.0 |
| | -1 | % | | -1 | % |
| Construction and Arts & Crafts Brands | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | | | |
| Other | 21.4 |
| | 24.2 |
| | -12 | % | | -1 | % |
| Total Gross Sales | $ | 589.9 |
| | $ | 596.2 |
| | -1 | % | | — | % |
| Sales Adjustments | (25.8 | ) | | (26.2 | ) | | | | |
| Total Net Sales | $ | 564.1 |
| | $ | 570.0 |
| | -1 | % | | — | % |
Gross sales for the American Girl segment were $589.9 million in 2016, a decrease of $6.3 million, or 1%, as compared to $596.2 million in 2015. Cost of sales decreased 3% in 2016, as compared to a 1% decrease in net sales, primarily due to lower product and other costs and lower freight and logistics costs. Gross margins in 2016 increased as a result of higher licensing income and Funding Our Future savings.
American Girl segment income increased by 52% to $106.4 million in 2016, as compared to $69.9 million in 2015, primarily due to the new franchise licensing agreement to expand the brand into the Middle East, lower advertising and promotion expenses, and lower other selling and administrative expenses.certain retail stores.
Cost Savings Programs
Funding Our Future
During 2015, Mattel initiated Funding Our Future, which was designed to generate cost savings through various initiatives, including structural and process improvements and supply chain optimization. Funding our Future targeted cumulative gross cost savings of approximately $250 million to $300 million by the end of 2016. Mattel achieved cumulative gross cost savings of approximately $295 million (or approximately $215 million in net cost savings), which was at the high end of its Funding Our Future goal. Of the cumulative gross cost savings realized, approximately $144 million was reflected within gross profit, approximately $133 million within other selling and administrative expenses, and approximately $18 million within advertising and promotion expenses.
Structural Simplification Cost Savings Program
During the third quarter of 2017, Mattel initiated its Structural Simplification Cost Savings program, with plans to target at least $650 million in net cost savings by 2020, with one thirdprogram. As of the savings expected to be achieved in 2018 and the remaining two thirds in 2019. In December 2017,31, 2019, Mattel announced that it had identified additional opportunities forsuccessfully completed its Structural Simplification cost savings that increasedprogram and achieved $875 million of run-rate savings, exceeding the total original cost savings expectation for 2018 from one-third to 40%program's target of the total savings. Of the total net costs savings to be achieved by 2020, Mattel estimates 50% will come from cost of sales, 45% will come from other selling and administrative expenses, and 5% will come from advertising and promotion expenses.$650 million.
The major initiatives of the Structural Simplification Cost Savingscost savings program include:included:
Reducing manufacturing complexity, including SKU reduction, and implementing process improvement initiatives at owned and co-manufacturing facilities;
Streamlining the organizational structure and reducing headcount expense to better align with the revenue base; and
Optimizing advertising spend.
During 2017, in connection with the Structural Simplification Cost Savings program, Mattel recordedrealized cost savings (before severance, investments, and other termination-related chargescost inflation) of $45.1approximately $366 million (approximately $219 million within gross profit, approximately $123 million within other selling and administrative expenses, and approximately $24 million within advertising and promotion expenses) during the year ended December 31, 2019 in connection with the program.
Mattel recorded severance and other restructuring charges of $21.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 in connection with the program. Of the total charges recorded during the year ended December 31, 2019, $11.7 million relate to severance charges and $9.8 million relate to other restructuring costs, which consisted primarily of consulting fees and other termination costs. Mattel recorded severance and other restructuring charges of $109.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2018. Of the total charges recorded during the year ended December 31, 2018, $62.9 million relate to severance charges and $47.0 million relate to other restructuring costs. Of the $47.0 million of other restructuring costs, $5.7 million relate to non-cash plant restructuring charges, and the remainder consists primarily of consulting fees. Mattel has recorded cumulative severance and other restructuring charges of $176.5 million in connection with the program.
Capital Light Program
During the first quarter of 2019, Mattel announced the commencement of its Capital Light program to optimize Mattel's manufacturing footprint (including the sale or consolidation of manufacturing facilities), increase the productivity of its plant infrastructure, and achieve additional efficiencies across its entire supply chain. In conjunction with the Capital Light program, Mattel discontinued production in 2019 at certain plants located in China, Indonesia, and Mexico. In addition to the discontinued production at the three plants, Mattel announced that it will discontinue production in 2020 at its plant located in Canada. Mattel recorded severance and other restructuring charges of $37.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 in connection with the program. Of the total charges recorded during the year ended December 31, 2019, $19.0 million was recorded within other selling and administrative expenses which is included in Corporate and Other expense and of the $18.6 million recorded within cost of sales in the consolidated statements of operations.operations, $10.4 million, $8.0 million and $0.2 million are included in North America, International, and American Girl segments, respectively, which is presented within segment income (loss) in "Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Segment Information."
To date, Mattel has recorded cumulative severance and other restructuring charges of $37.6 million, including non-cash charges of approximately $11 million, in connection with the program and currently expects to incur total severance and restructuring charges, excluding non-cash charges, of approximately $160$35 million. Mattel is currently evaluating other cost saving measures, including the optimization of owned and operated manufacturing facilities and the geographical footprint of co-manufacturing facilities, which may result in incremental cost savings. Mattel expects to realize cumulative run-rate cost savings of approximately $65 million during 2018in 2020, and 2019$72 million by 2021 related to the Structural Simplification Cost SavingsCapital Light program actions taken to date.
Mattel realized cost savings (before severance, restructuring costs, and cost inflation) of approximately $15 million, primarily within gross profit, during the year ended December 31, 2019 in connection with the program.
Income Taxes
Mattel’s effective tax rate on loss beforeprovision for income taxes was (108.7)%$55.2 million in 2017,2019, as compared to an effective tax rate on income before income taxes of 22.4% and 20.4%$116.2 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively.2018. The 2019 income tax provision in 2017 included neta $13.4 million tax expense of $454.4 million, as compared to net tax benefits of $16.8 million and $19.1 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively. The 2017 net tax expense primarilybenefit related to the establishmentrelease of a valuation allowanceallowances in the third quarter of 2017 on U.S. deferredcertain foreign tax assets that will likely not be realizedjurisdictions, and a provisional estimate of the impact of U.S. Tax Reform in the fourth quarter of 2017. The 2016 net$16.9 million tax benefits primarilybenefit related to reassessments of prior years’year’s tax liabilities based on the status of audits and tax filingssettlements in various jurisdictions around the world, settlements, and enactedjurisdictions. The 2018 income tax law changes, and the adoption of Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2015-17. The 2015 net tax benefits primarilyprovision included a $14.6 million expense related to reassessmentschanges to Mattel's indefinite reinvestment assertion and a $3.7 million expense related to the deemed repatriation of prior years’ tax liabilities based on the statusaccumulated foreign earnings (net of audits and tax filings in various jurisdictions around the world, settlements, and enacted tax law changes.related valuation allowance change).
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Mattel’s primary sources of liquidity are its cash and equivalents balances, including access to earnings of its foreign subsidiaries, short-term borrowing facilities, including its $1.60 billion senior secured revolving credit facilities ("the new senior secured revolving credit facilities"), and issuances of long-term debt securities. Cash flows from operating activities could be negatively impacted by decreased demand for Mattel’s products, which could result from factors such as adverse economic conditions and changes in public and consumer preferences, or by increased costs associated with manufacturing and distribution of products or shortages in raw materials or component parts. Additionally, Mattel’s ability to issue long-term debt and obtain seasonal financing could be adversely affected by factors such as global economic crises and tight credit environments, an inability to meet its debt covenant requirements and its new senior secured revolving credit facility covenants, or a deterioration of Mattel’s credit ratings. Mattel’s ability to conduct its operations could be negatively impacted should these or other adverse conditions affect its primary sources of liquidity.
Of Mattel’s $1.08 billion$630.0 million in cash and equivalents as of December 31, 2017,2019, approximately $283$338 million iswas held by foreign subsidiaries. Mattel has several liquidity options to fund its operations and obligations; such obligations may include investing and financing activities such as debt service, dividends, and share repurchases. Positive cashCash flows generated annually by its worldwide operations, the new senior secured revolving credit facilities, alternative forms of financing, and access to both public and private debtcapital markets are available to fund domesticMattel's operations and obligations.
The U.S. Tax Reform,Act, enacted on December 22, 2017, will provideprovides Mattel with greatera reduced cost to access tothe earnings of its foreign subsidiaries. As such, Mattel has evaluated its intentions related to its indefinite reinvestment assertion and has recorded a $11.9 million tax charge related to approximately $505 million of foreign earnings that will not be indefinitely reinvested.
With the passage of the U.S. Tax Reform does impose a one-time transitionAct, repatriations of foreign cash generally will not be taxable for U.S. federal income tax, on the deemed repatriation of the earnings of Mattel’sbut may be subject to state income tax and/or foreign subsidiaries. Mattel has significant deferredwithholding tax, assets which can be usedin addition to reduce the one-time repatriation tax and therefore, does not expect the one time repatriation tax to be material to either its cash flows or liquidity.
In October 2017, Mattel's Board of Directors determined to suspend Mattel's quarterly dividend beginning in the fourth quarter of 2017 in order to increase financial flexibility, strengthen the balance sheet, and facilitate strategic investments. Mattel paid dividends of $0.38 per share to holders of its common stock in the first and second quarter of 2017 and $0.15 per share in the third quarter of 2017.any local country distribution requirements.
Current Market Conditions
Mattel is exposed to financial market risk resulting from changes in interest and foreign currency exchange rates. Mattel continues to actively manage its capital structure and believes that it has amplesufficient liquidity to fundrun its business needs, including beginning of year cash and equivalents, cash flows from operations, and access to its new senior secured revolving credit facilities, which it uses for seasonal working capital requirements.business.
Subject to market conditions, Mattel intends to utilize its new senior secured revolving credit facilities or alternative forms of financing to meet its short-term liquidity needs. As of December 31, 2017,2019, there were no amounts outstanding under the new senior secured revolving credit facilities. Market conditions could affect certain terms of other debt instruments that Mattel enters into from time to time.
Mattel monitors the third-party depository institutions that hold Mattel's cash and equivalents. Mattel’s emphasis is primarily on safety and liquidity of principal, and secondarily on maximizing the yield on those funds. Mattel diversifies its cash and equivalents among counterparties and securities to minimize risks.
Mattel is subject to credit risks relating to the ability of its counterparties in hedging transactions to meet their contractual payment obligations. The risks related to creditworthiness and nonperformance have been considered in the fair value measurements of Mattel’s foreign currency forward exchange contracts. Mattel closely monitors its counterparties and takes action, as necessary, to manage its counterparty credit risk.
Mattel expects that some of its customers and vendors may experience difficulty in obtaining the liquidity required to buy inventory or raw materials. Mattel monitors its customers’ financial condition and their liquidity in order to mitigate Mattel’s accounts receivable collectibility risks, and customer terms and credit limits are adjusted, if necessary. Additionally, Mattel uses a variety of financial arrangements to ensure collectibility of accounts receivable of customers deemed to be a credit risk, including requiring letters of credit, factoring, purchasing various forms of credit insurance with unrelated third parties, or requiring cash in advance of shipment. As a result of the Toys "R" Us filing for bankruptcyliquidation in September 2017,the first quarter of 2018, Mattel reversed grossnet sales that occurred during the first quarter of 2018 and related accounts receivable of approximately $47 million, and reversed$30 million. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2018, Mattel recorded bad debt expense, net sales of approximately $43$32 million, inrelated to outstanding Toys "R" Us receivables at the third quartertime of 2017.liquidation.
Mattel sponsors defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefit plans for its employees. Actual returns below the expected rate of return, along with changes in interest rates that affect the measurement of the liability, would impact the amount and timing of Mattel’s future contributions to these plans.
Operating Activities
Cash flows provided by operating activities were $181.0 million during 2019, as compared to cash used for operating activities were $27.6of $27.3 million during 2017, as compared to net2018. The change in cash flows fromprovided by (used for) operating activities of $594.5 million during 2016 and $734.6 million during 2015. The changein 2019 from 2016 to 20172018 was due to theprimarily driven by a lower net loss, for the year, excluding the net impact of the establishment of a valuation allowance on U.S. deferred tax assets that will likely not be realized and an estimate of the impact of U.S. Tax Reform, and other non-cash charges. The decrease in cash flows from operating activities in 2016 from 2015 was primarily due to higher working capital usage and lower net income.
Investing Activities
Cash flows used for investing activities were $235.7$114.2 million during 2017,2019, as compared to $311.9$160.8 million during 2016 and $282.5 million during 2015.2018. The decreasechange in cash flows used for investing activities in 20172019 from 20162018 was primarily due to higher proceeds fromdriven by lower capital spending and lower payments for foreign currency forward exchange contracts and 2016 payments related to the acquisitions of Fuhu assets and Sproutling, Inc., partially offset by higher capital spending. The increase in cash flows used for investing activities in 2016 from 2015 was primarily due to the acquisitions of Fuhu assets and Sproutling, Inc. in 2016.contracts.
Financing Activities
Cash flows provided by financing activities were $458.5 million during 2017, as compared to cash flows used for financing activities of $281.5were $33.1 million during 2016 and $500.22019, as compared to $285.2 million during 2015.2018. The increasechange in cash flows provided byfrom financing activities in 20172019 from 20162018 was primarily due to the $1.00 billion issuance of senior notes in December 2017, partially offsetdriven by higher net repayments of short-term borrowings. The decreaselong-term borrowings, net of $278 million in cash flows used for financing activities in 2016 from 2015 was primarily due to the $350.0 million issuance of senior notes in the third quarter of 2016 and higher short-term borrowings, partially offset by the $300.0 million repayment of senior notes which matured in the fourth quarter of 2016.2018.
During 2017, 2016,2019 and 2015,2018, Mattel did not repurchase any shares of its common stock. Mattel's share repurchase program was first announced on July 21, 2003. On July 17, 2013, the Board of Directors authorized Mattel to increase its share repurchase program by $500.0 million. At December 31, 2017,2019, share repurchase authorizations of $203.0 million had not been executed. Repurchases under the program will take place from time to time, depending on market conditions. Mattel's share repurchase program has no expiration date.
During 2017, 2016,2019 and 2015,2018, Mattel paid totaldid not pay any dividends per share of $0.91, $1.52, and $1.52, respectively, to holders of its common stock. The Board of Directors declared the dividends, if any, on a quarterly basis, and Mattel paid the dividends during the quarters in which the dividends were declared, if applicable. The payment of dividends on common stock is at the discretion of the Board of Directors and is subject to customary limitations. Dividend payments were $312.0 million, $518.5 million, and $515.1 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
Seasonal Financing
See Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Seasonal Financing and Debt."
Credit Rating
In December 2017, Moody's changed2019, Fitch maintained Mattel's long-term credit rating to Ba2, changed its short-term credit rating to NP,of B- and changed its outlook from negative to stable. Standard & Poor's changedpositive. In 2019, Moody's maintained Mattel's long-term credit rating to BB-. Fitch changedof B1, with a stable outlook. In 2019, Standard & Poor's maintained Mattel's long-term credit rating to BB and changed its short-term credit rating to B. In July 2017, Standard & Poor's changed Mattel’s long-term credit rating to BBB- and changed its short-term credit rating to A-3. Fitch changed Mattel’s long-term credit rating to BBB. In January 2017, Moody's placed Mattel’s Senior Unsecured Debt rating of Baa1 onBB-, with a negative watch and Standard & Poor's changed Mattel's outlook from stable to negative.outlook.
Financial Position
Mattel’s cash and equivalents increased $209.7$35.5 million to $1.08 billion at December 31, 2017, as compared to $869.5$630.0 million at December 31, 2016.2019, as compared to $594.5 million at December 31, 2018. The increase was primarily drivendue to cash provided by proceeds from the $1.00 billion issuance of senior notes in December 2017,operating activities, partially offset by dividend payments, capital spending,expenditures and net repaymentsdebt issuance costs related to refinancing of short-term borrowings.senior notes.
Accounts receivable increased $13.4decreased $33.7 million to $1.13 billion at December 31, 2017, as compared to $1.12 billion at December 31, 2016. Inventory decreased $13.1 million to $600.7$936.4 million at December 31, 2017,2019, as compared to $613.8$970.1 million at December 31, 2016.2018. The increasedecrease in accounts receivable was primarily a result of higher sales in markets with longer payment terms.due to lower fourth quarter sales. Inventory decreased $47.4 million to $495.5 million at December 31, 2019, as compared to $542.9 million at December 31, 2018. The decrease in inventory was primarily due to an increase in the obsolescence reserve due totighter inventory control and better demand management, and lower product costs as a decline in sales and the discontinuationresult of certain product lines, partially offset by higher excess inventory.Structural Simplification cost savings.
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities increased $70.6 million to $1.36remained flat at $1.23 billion at December 31, 2017, as compared to $1.29 billion at December 31, 2016.2019 and 2018. The increase is primarilychange in accounts payable and accrued liabilities was due to continued efforts to manage vendor disbursements.the establishment of short term lease liabilities in 2019 upon adoption of the new lease standard offset by lower accounts payable as a result of timing of payments.
As of December 31, 2017,2019 and 2018, Mattel had no$0 and $4.2 million, respectively, of short-term borrowings outstanding, as compared to $192.2 million at December 31, 2016.outstanding.
A summary of Mattel’s capitalization is as follows:
| | | | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Cash and equivalents | $ | 1,079.2 |
| |
|
| | $ | 869.5 |
| |
|
| $ | 630.0 |
| |
|
| | $ | 594.5 |
| |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Short-term borrowings | — |
| | — | % | | 192.2 |
| | 4 | % | — |
| |
|
| | 4.2 |
| |
|
|
| 2010 Senior Notes | 500.0 |
| | 11 |
| | 500.0 |
| | 11 |
| |
| 2011 Senior Notes | 300.0 |
| | 7 |
| | 300.0 |
| | 5 |
| |
| 2013 Senior Notes | 500.0 |
| | 11 |
| | 500.0 |
| | 11 |
| |
| 2014 Senior Notes | 500.0 |
| | 11 |
| | 500.0 |
| | 11 |
| |
| 2016 Senior Notes | 350.0 |
| | 8 |
| | 350.0 |
| | 7 |
| |
| 2017 Senior Notes | 1,000.0 |
| | 23 |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| 2010 Senior Notes due October 2020 and October 2040 | | 250.0 |
| |
|
| | 500.0 |
| |
|
|
| 2011 Senior Notes due November 2041 | | 300.0 |
| |
|
| | 300.0 |
| |
|
|
| 2013 Senior Notes due March 2023 | | 250.0 |
| |
|
| | 250.0 |
| |
|
|
| 2016 Senior Notes due August 2021 | | — |
| |
|
| | 350.0 |
| |
|
|
| 2017/2018 Senior Notes due December 2025 | | 1,500.0 |
| |
|
| | 1,500.0 |
| |
|
|
| 2019 Senior Notes due December 2027 | | 600.0 |
| |
|
| | — |
| |
|
|
| Debt issuance costs and debt discount | (26.9 | ) | | — |
| | (15.7 | ) | | — |
| (53.2 | ) | |
|
| | (48.3 | ) | |
|
|
| Total debt | 3,123.1 |
| | 71 |
| | 2,326.5 |
| | 49 |
| 2,846.8 |
| | 85 | % | | 2,855.9 |
| | 81 | % |
| Stockholders’ equity | 1,257.5 |
| | 29 |
| | 2,407.8 |
| | 51 |
| 491.7 |
| | 15 |
| | 666.9 |
| | 19 |
|
| Total capitalization (debt plus equity) | $ | 4,380.6 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 4,734.3 |
| | 100 | % | $ | 3,338.5 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 3,522.8 |
| | 100 | % |
Total long-term debt increased by approximately $797 million from December 31, 2016 to $3.12remained flat at $2.8 billion at December 31, 2017, primarily due to2019. Mattel used the proceeds from the issuance of $1.00 billion$600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.75%5.875% senior unsecured notes due December 31, 202515, 2027 ("20172019 Senior Notes"). to redeem and retire its $250.0 million of 2010 Senior Notes due October 2020 and $350.0 million of 2016 Senior Notes due August 2021.
Stockholders’ equity decreased $1.15 billion from December 31, 2016$175.2 million to $1.26 billion$491.7 million at December 31, 2017,2019, as compared to $666.9 million at December 31, 2018, primarily due to the net loss for the year and dividend payments, partially offset by currency translation adjustments.
Mattel’s debt-to-total capital ratio, including short-term borrowings and the current portion of long-term debt, increased from 49.1% at December 31, 2016 to 71.3% at December 31, 2017 as a result of higher long-term borrowings and lower stockholders’ equity.year.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Mattel has nois required to provide standby letters of credit to support certain obligations that arise in the ordinary course of business and may choose to provide letters of credit in place of posting cash collateral. Although the letters of credit are off-balance sheet, arrangements that have orthe majority of the obligations in which they relate are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on its financial condition, revenues or expenses, resultsreflected as liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. Outstanding letters of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.credit totaled approximately $57 million as of December 31, 2019.
Commitments
In the normal course of business, Mattel enters into debt agreements, and contractual arrangements to obtain and protect Mattel’s right to create and market certain products and for future purchases of goods and services to ensure availability and timely delivery. These arrangements include commitments for future inventory and service purchases and royalty payments pursuant to licensing agreements. Certain of these commitmentsagreements, which routinely contain provisions for guarantees or minimum expenditures during the terms of the contracts.contracts, and future inventory and service purchases. Mattel also has defined benefit and postretirement benefit plans, which require future cash contributions and benefit payments. Additionally, Mattel routinely enters into noncancelable lease agreements for premises and equipment used, which contain minimum rental payments.
The following table summarizes Mattel’s contractual commitments and obligations:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | Thereafter |
| | (In millions) |
| Long-term debt | $ | 3,150.0 |
| | $ | 250.0 |
| | $ | 500.0 |
| | $ | 250.0 |
| | $ | 350.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,800.0 |
|
| Interest on long-term debt | 1,399.8 |
| | 139.0 |
| | 130.4 |
| | 123.6 |
| | 112.4 |
| | 107.2 |
| | 787.2 |
|
| Capital leases* | 0.6 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Operating leases | 580.6 |
| | 111.6 |
| | 92.6 |
| | 75.7 |
| | 65.0 |
| | 56.4 |
| | 179.2 |
|
| Minimum guarantees under licensing and similar agreements | 321.5 |
| | 80.6 |
| | 122.7 |
| | 84.1 |
| | 29.7 |
| | 4.5 |
| | — |
|
| Defined benefit and postretirement benefit plans | 398.6 |
| | 61.8 |
| | 37.8 |
| | 37.6 |
| | 37.7 |
| | 38.7 |
| | 185.0 |
|
| Purchases of inventory, services, and other | 358.8 |
| | 307.9 |
| | 35.2 |
| | 13.4 |
| | 2.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | $ | 6,210.0 |
| | $ | 951.2 |
| | $ | 919.0 |
| | $ | 584.5 |
| | $ | 597.1 |
| | $ | 206.8 |
| | $ | 2,951.4 |
|
* Represents total obligation, including imputed interest of $0.1 million. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2024 | | Thereafter |
| | (In millions) |
| Long-term debt | $ | 2,900.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 250.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,650.0 |
|
| Interest on long-term debt | 1,591.9 |
| | 176.2 |
| | 176.2 |
| | 176.2 |
| | 170.0 |
| | 168.4 |
| | 724.9 |
|
| Leases | 450.3 |
| | 96.6 |
| | 84.3 |
| | 63.9 |
| | 46.7 |
| | 32.7 |
| | 126.0 |
|
| Minimum guarantees under licensing and similar agreements | 184.3 |
| | 85.4 |
| | 53.7 |
| | 42.9 |
| | 1.5 |
| | 0.8 |
| | — |
|
| Defined benefit and postretirement benefit plans | 373.3 |
| | 38.4 |
| | 38.2 |
| | 40.3 |
| | 39.2 |
| | 39.6 |
| | 177.7 |
|
| Purchases of inventory, services, and other | 341.9 |
| | 249.6 |
| | 54.4 |
| | 37.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | $ | 5,841.7 |
| | $ | 646.2 |
| | $ | 406.8 |
| | $ | 361.3 |
| | $ | 507.4 |
| | $ | 241.4 |
| | $ | 3,678.6 |
|
Liabilities for uncertain tax positions for which a cash tax payment is not expected to be made in the next twelve months are classified as other noncurrent liabilities. Due to the uncertainty about the periods in which examinations will be completed and limited information related to current audits, Mattel is not able to make reasonably reliable estimates of the periods in which cash settlements will occur with taxing authorities for the noncurrent liabilities.
Subsequent Event
See Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Subsequent Event."
Litigation
The content of Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 1112 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Commitments and Contingencies—Litigation" is hereby incorporated by reference in this Item 7.
Effects of Inflation
Inflation rates in the U.S. and in major foreign countries where Mattel does business have not had a significant impact on its results of operations or financial position during 2017, 2016,2019 or 2015.2018. Mattel receives some protection from the impact of inflation from high turnover of inventories and its ability, under certain circumstances and at certain times, to pass on higher prices to its customers.
Employee Savings Plan
Mattel sponsors a 401(k) savings plan, the Mattel, Inc. Personal Investment Plan (the "Plan"), for its domestic employees. Contributions to the Plan include voluntary contributions by eligible employees and employer automatic and matching contributions by Mattel. The Plan allows employees to allocate both their voluntary contributions and their employer automatic and matching contributions to a variety of investment funds, including a fund that is invested in Mattel common stock (the "Mattel Stock Fund"). Employees are not required to allocate any of their Plan account balance to the Mattel Stock Fund, allowing employees to limit or eliminate their exposure to market changes in Mattel’s stock price. Furthermore, the Plan limits the percentage of the employee’s total account balance that may be allocated to the Mattel Stock Fund to 25%. Employees may generally reallocate their account balances on a daily basis. However, pursuant to Mattel’s insider trading policy, employees classified as insiders and restricted personnel under Mattel’s insider trading policy are limited to certain periods in which they may make allocations into or out of the Mattel Stock Fund.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Mattel makes certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. The accounting policies and estimates described below are those Mattel considers most critical in preparing its consolidated financial statements. Management has discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of its Board of Directors, and the Audit Committee has reviewed the disclosures included below. These accounting policies and estimates include significant judgments made by management using information available at the time the estimates are made. As described below, however, these estimates could change materially if different information or assumptions were used instead.
For a summary of Mattel’s significant accounting policies, estimates, and methods used in the preparation of Mattel’s consolidated financial statements, see Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies." In most instances, Mattel must use an accounting policy or method because it is the only policy or method permitted under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP").
Accounts Receivable—Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The allowance for doubtful accounts represents adjustments to customer trade accounts receivable for amounts deemed partially or entirely uncollectible. Management believes the accounting estimate related to the allowance for doubtful accounts is a "critical accounting estimate" because significant changes in the assumptions used to develop the estimate could materially affect key financial measures, including other selling and administrative expenses, net income, and accounts receivable. In addition, the allowance requires a high degree of judgment since it involves estimation of the impact of both current and future economic factors in relation to its customers’ ability to pay amounts owed to Mattel.
Mattel’s products are sold throughout the world. Products within the North America segment are sold directly to retailers, including discount and free-standing toy stores, chain stores, department stores, other retail outlets and, to a limited extent, wholesalers, and directly to consumers. Products within the International segment are sold directly to retailers and wholesalers in most European, Latin American, and Asian countries, and in Australia and New Zealand, and through agents and distributors in those countries where Mattel has no direct presence.
In recent years, the mass-market retail channel has experienced significant shifts in market share among competitors, causing some large retailers to experience liquidity problems. Mattel’s sales to customers are typically made on credit without collateral and are highly concentrated in the third and fourth quarters due to the seasonal nature of toy sales, which results in a substantial portion of trade receivables being collected during the latter half of the year and the first quarter of the following year. There is a risk that customers will not pay, or that payment may be delayed, because of bankruptcy or other factors beyond the control of Mattel. This could increase Mattel’s exposure to losses from bad debts.
A small number of customers account for a large share of Mattel’s net sales and accounts receivable. In 2017,2019, Mattel’s threetwo largest customers, Wal-Mart, Toys "R" Us,Walmart and Target, in the aggregate, accounted for approximately 37%32% of net sales, and its ten largest customers, in the aggregate, accounted for approximately 47%49% of net sales. As of December 31, 2017,2019, Mattel’s threetwo largest customers accounted for approximately 31% of net accounts receivable, and its ten largest customers accounted for approximately 46%50% of net accounts receivable. The concentration of Mattel’s business with a relatively small number of customers may expose Mattel to a material adverse effect if one or more of Mattel’s large customers were to experience financial difficulty. Toys "R" Us filed for bankruptcy in September 2017 and, as a result, Mattel reversed gross sales and accounts receivable of approximately $47 million, and reversed net sales of approximately $43 million in the third quarter of 2017. As of February 23, 2018, Mattel's accounts receivable due from Toys "R" Us are not past due. Outstanding
accounts receivable as of February 23, 2018 due from Toys "R" Us in the North American region represent approximately 5% of total accounts receivable as of December 31, 2017.
Mattel has procedures to mitigate its risk of exposure to losses from bad debts. Revenue is recognized upon shipment or upon receipt of products by the customer, depending on the terms, provided that: there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance; persuasive evidence of an agreement exists documenting the specific terms of the transaction; the sales price is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is reasonably assured. Value added taxes are recorded on a net basis and are excluded from revenue. Credit limits and payment terms are established based on the underlying criteria that collectibility must be reasonably assured at the levels set for each customer. Extensive evaluations are performed on an ongoing basis throughout the fiscal year of each customer’s financial performance, cash generation, financing availability, and liquidity status. Customers are reviewed at least annually, with more frequent reviews being performed, if necessary, based on the customers’ financial condition and the level of credit being extended. For customers who are experiencing financial difficulties, management performs additional financial analyses prior to shipping to those customers on credit. Customers’ terms and credit limits are adjusted or revoked, if necessary, to reflect the results of the review. Mattel uses a variety of financial arrangements to ensure collectibility of accounts receivable of customers deemed to be a credit risk, including requiring letters of credit, factoring, purchasing various forms of credit insurance with unrelated third parties, or requiring cash in advance of shipment.
The following table summarizes Mattel’s allowance for doubtful accounts:
| | | | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 25.4 |
| | $ | 21.4 |
| | $ | 24.4 |
| $ | 18.5 |
| | $ | 22.0 |
|
| As a percentage of total accounts receivable | 2.2 | % | | 1.4 | % | | 1.6 | % | 1.9 | % | | 2.2 | % |
Mattel’s allowance for doubtful accounts is based on management’s assessment of the business environment, customers’ financial condition, historical collection experience, accounts receivable aging, and customer disputes. Changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts reflect management’s assessment of the factors noted above, including past due accounts, disputed balances with customers, and the financial condition of customers. The allowance for doubtful accounts is also affected by the time at which uncollectible accounts receivable balances are actually written off.
Mattel believes that its allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 20172019 is adequate and proper. However, as described above, Mattel’s business is greatly dependent on a small number of customers. Should one or more of Mattel’s major customers experience liquidity problems, then the allowance for doubtful accounts may not be sufficient to cover such losses. Any incremental bad debt charges would negatively affect the results of operations of one or more of Mattel’s business segments.
Inventories—Allowance for Obsolescence
Inventories, net of an allowance for excess quantities and obsolescence, are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Inventory obsolescence reserves are recorded for damaged, obsolete, excess, and slow-moving inventory. Inventory allowances are charged to cost of sales and establish a lower cost basis for the inventory. Management believes that the accounting estimate related to the allowance for obsolescence is a "critical accounting estimate" because changes in the assumptions used to develop the estimate could materially affect key financial measures, including gross profit, net income, and inventories. As more fully described below, valuation of Mattel’s inventory could be impacted by changes in public and consumer preferences, demand for product, or changes in the buying patterns of both retailers and consumers and inventory management of customers.
In the toy industry, orders are typically subject to cancellation or change at any time prior to shipment since actualshipment. Actual shipments of products ordered and order cancellation rates are affected by consumer acceptance of product lines, strength of competing products, marketing strategies of retailers, changes in buying patterns of both retailers and consumers, and overall economic conditions. Unexpected changes in these factors could result in excess inventory in a particular product line, which would require management to record a valuation adjustment on such inventory.
Mattel bases its production schedules for toy products on customer orders and forecasts, taking into account historical trends, results of market research, and current market information. Mattel ships products in accordance with delivery schedules specified by its customers, who usually request delivery within three months. In anticipation of retail sales in the traditional holiday season, Mattel significantly increases its production in advance of the peak selling period, resulting in a corresponding build-up of inventory levels in the first three quarters of its fiscal year. These seasonal purchasing patterns and requisite production lead times create risk to Mattel’s business associated with the underproduction of popular toys and the overproduction of toys that do not match consumer demand. Retailers are also attempting to manage their inventories more tightly, requiring Mattel to ship products closer to the time the retailers expect to sell the products to consumers. These factors increase inventory valuation risk since Mattel’s inventory levels may be adversely impacted by the need to pre-build products before orders are placed.
When current conditions in the domestic and global economies become uncertain, it is difficult to estimate the level of growth or contraction for the economy as a whole. It is even more difficult to estimate growth or contraction in various parts of the economy, including the economies in which Mattel participates. Because all components of Mattel’s budgeting and forecasting are dependent upon estimates of growth or contraction in the markets it serves and demand for its products, economic uncertainty makes estimates of future demand for product more difficult. Such economic changes may affect the sales of Mattel’s products and its corresponding inventory levels, which could potentially impact the valuation of its inventory.
At the end of each quarter, management within each business segment, North America, International, and American Girl, performs a detailed review of its inventory on an item-by-item basis and identifies products that are believed to be impaired. Management assesses the need for, and the amount of, an obsolescence reserve based on the following factors:
Customer and/or consumer demand for the item;
Overall inventory positions of Mattel’s customers;
Strength of competing products in the market;
Quantity on hand of the item;
Sales price of the item;
Mattel’s cost for the item; and
Length of time the item has been in inventory.
The timeframe between when an estimate is made and the time of disposal depends on the above factors and may vary significantly. Generally, slow-moving inventory is liquidated during the next annual selling cycle.
The following table summarizes Mattel’s obsolescence reserve:
| | | | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Allowance for obsolescence | $ | 118.4 |
| | $ | 36.8 |
| | $ | 45.7 |
| $ | 43.6 |
| | $ | 47.2 |
|
| As a percentage of total inventory | 16.8 | % | | 5.5 | % | | 7.2 | % | 8.1 | % | | 8.2 | % |
Management believes that its allowance for obsolescence at December 31, 20172019 is adequate and proper. However, the impact resulting from the aforementioned factors could cause actual results to vary. Any incremental obsolescence charges would negatively affect the results of operations of one or more of Mattel’s business segments. During 2017, Mattel recorded obsolescence expense of $58.3 million, $22.4 million, and $46.9 million in the North America, International, and American Girl segments, respectively, due to a decline in sales and expected demand and the discontinuation of certain product lines.
Goodwill and Nonamortizable Intangible Assets
Mattel tests goodwill and nonamortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more often if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment may have occurred. Management believes that the accounting estimates related to the fair value estimates of its goodwill and nonamortizable intangible assets are "critical accounting estimates" because significant changes in the assumptions used to develop the estimates could materially affect key financial measures, including net income, goodwill, and other intangible assets.
Assessing goodwill for impairment involves a high degree of judgment due to the assumptions that underlie the valuation. For purposes of evaluating whether goodwill is impaired, goodwill is allocated to various reporting units, which are at the operating segment level. Mattel’s reporting units are: (i) North America, (ii) International, and (iii) American Girl. Mattel then assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. This qualitative assessment is used as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test.
When the quantitative goodwill impairment test is necessary, impairment is determined by estimating the fair value of a reporting unit and comparing that value to the reporting unit’s bookcarrying value. In the third quarter of 2017, Mattel early adopted ASU 2017-04 Intangibles - Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in an amount equal to the excess, limited by the amount of goodwill in that reporting unit.
When performing the quantitative goodwill impairment test, Mattel utilizes the fair value based upon both the discounted cash flows that the business can be expected to generate in the future (the "Income Approach") and the Market Approach.market approach. The Income Approach valuation method requires Mattel to make projections of revenue, operating costs, and working capital investment for the reporting unit over a multi-year period. Additionally, management must make an estimate of a weighted averageweighted-average cost of capital that a market participant would use as a discount rate. Changes in these projections or estimates would impact the estimated fair value, which could significantly change the amount of any impairment ultimately recorded. The Market Approachmarket approach utilizes earnings multiples of comparable public companies, which are reflective of the market in which each respective reporting unit operates, and recent comparable market transactions. The market approach is utilized for the North America and International Reporting Units.
In the third quarter of 2017,2019, Mattel performed its annual impairment teststest and determined that goodwill was not impaired since each reporting unit's fair value exceeded its carrying value. The fair values
Based upon the results of the North America and American Girl reporting units were substantially in excess of their carrying value. Mattel’s International reporting unit was deemed to be at risk of failing the goodwill impairment test. The estimated fair value was approximately 1.39x its carrying value.
In the fourth quarter of 2017, Mattel determined that a triggering event had occurred based on its fourth quarter results and updated outlook. As a result, Mattel performed an interimannual impairment test, for each of its reporting units. Thethe fair value of the North America and American Girl reporting units wereunit was substantially in excess of their carrying value. Mattel's International reporting unit was deemed to be at risk of failing the goodwill impairment test, with an estimated fair value approximately 1.08x its carrying value. The estimated fair value of the American Girl and International reporting units had more than 25% excess fair value over its carrying value.
The fair value of the American Girl reporting unit did not meet its estimated profitability targets for 2017, primarily due to higheris impacted by expected sales adjustments andgrowth, gross margin, operating costs, working capital investments, and discount rate. The estimates of gross margin, operating costs and working capital investments tend to be fairly predictable in relation to gross sales. The estimates of future sales growth tend to be one of the more significant estimates in determining the overall fair value of the American Girl reporting unit. The current forecast includes significant moderation in the decline andof sales in the near term resulting from recently launched growth initiatives, followed by significant growth in sales from current levels as it continues to increase consumer engagement in the brand. In addition, the fair value of the American Girl reporting unit decreased significantly from the prior year as a result a downward revision was madeof the increase in discount rate from 9.5% to future years' forecasts. If the International reporting unit does not meet its future forecasts12%, due to factors such as lower than expecteda specific risk premium. If American Girl is unable to successfully execute its plan to increase sales or depressed gross margins,through the renewal of consumer interest in the brand and its products, goodwill may be impaired.
Testing nonamortizable intangible assets for impairment also involves a high degree of judgment due to the assumptions that underlie the valuation. Mattel evaluates its nonamortizable intangible asset by comparing the estimated fair value with the carrying value.
The fair value of the International reporting unit is measured usingimpacted by expected sales growth, gross margin, operating costs, working capital investments, and discount rate. The valuation of the International reporting unit decreased as a multi-period excess earnings method, which reflectsresult of the increase in discount rate from the prior year, from 11% to 12.5%. The valuation model assumes incremental after-tax cash flows after deducting the appropriate contributory asset charges.growth in sales and gross margin from current levels. If Mattel is unable to successfully execute its plans in international markets to achieve further growth in emerging markets, improve gross margin, or has lower-than-expected market demand, goodwill may be impaired.
In the third quarter of 2017,2018, Mattel performed theits annual impairment test for its nonamortizable intangible asset as required and determined that the nonamortizable intangible assetgoodwill was not impaired as thesince each reporting unit's fair value exceeded its carrying value.
In the fourth quarter of 2017, Mattel determined a triggering event had occurred due to a change in brand strategy, which resulted in lower forecasted revenue attributable to the nonamortizable intangible asset. As a result, Mattel performed an interim impairment test which determined that the fair value was in excess of its carrying value, with an estimated fair value approximately 1.05x its carrying value. As such, Mattel determined that the intangible asset should no longer be designated as a nonamortizable intangible asset, but should be amortized starting in the fourth quarter of 2017.
Sales Adjustments
Mattel routinely enters into arrangements with its customers to provide sales incentives, support customer promotions, and provide allowances for returns and defective merchandise. Such programs are based primarily on customer purchases, customer performance of specified promotional activities, and other specified factors such as sales to consumers. Accruals for these programs are recorded as sales adjustments that reduce gross sales in the period the related sale is recognized. Sales adjustments for such programs totaled $632.2 million, $617.0$560.0 million and $581.0$560.7 million during 2017, 2016,2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
The above-described programs primarily involve fixed amounts or percentages of sales to customers. AccrualsThe accrual for such programs, are calculatedwhich can either be contractual or discretionary in nature, is based on an assessment of customers’customer purchases, andcustomer performance under the programsof specified promotional activities, and any other specified factors.factors such as customer sales volume. While the majority of sales adjustment amounts are readily determinable at period end and do not require estimates, certain of the sales adjustments (i.e., discretionary sales adjustments) require management to make estimates. In making these estimates, management considers all available information, including the overall business environment, historical trends, and information from customers. Management believes that the accruals recorded for customer programs as of December 31, 20172019 are adequate and proper.
Benefit Plan Assumptions
Mattel and certain of its subsidiaries have retirement and other postretirement benefit plans covering substantially all employees of these companies. See Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Employee Benefit Plans."
Actuarial valuations are used in determining amounts recognized in the financial statements for certain retirement and other postretirement benefit plans. These valuations incorporate the following significant assumptions:
Weighted averageWeighted-average discount rate to be used to measure future plan obligations and interest cost component of plan income or expense;
Rate of future compensation increases (for defined benefit pension plans);
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets (for funded plans); and
Health care cost trend rates (for other postretirement benefit plans).
Management believes that these assumptions are "critical accounting estimates" because significant changes in these assumptions could impact Mattel’s results of operations and financial position. Management believes that the assumptions utilized to record its obligations under its plans are reasonable based on the plans’ experience and advice received from its outside actuaries. Mattel reviews its benefit plan assumptions annually and modifies its assumptions based on current rates and trends as appropriate. The effects of such changes in assumptions are amortized as part of plan income or expense in future periods.
At the end of each fiscal year, Mattel determines the weighted averageweighted-average discount rate used to calculate the projected benefit obligation. The discount rate is an estimate of the current interest rate at which the benefit plan liabilities could be effectively settled at the end of the year. The discount rate also impacts the interest cost component of plan income or expense. As of December 31, 2017,2019, Mattel determined the discount rate for its domestic benefit plans used in determining the projected and accumulated benefit obligations to be 3.4%3.0%, as compared to 3.9% and 4.2%4.1% as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.2018. In estimating this rate, Mattel reviews rates of return on high-quality corporate bond indices, which approximate the timing and amount of benefit payments. Assuming all other benefit plan assumptions remain constant, the decrease in the discount rate from 3.9%4.1% to 3.4%3.0% would result in a decrease in benefit plan expense during 20182020 of $0.4$0.6 million.
As a result of the curtailment of Mattel's domestic defined benefit pension plans, the rate of future compensation increase was not applicable for the 20172019 and 20162018 benefit obligation and net periodic pension cost calculations. The rate of future compensation increases used by Mattel for the benefit obligation and the net periodic pension cost of its domestic defined benefit pension plans averaged 3.8% for 2015, based on plan demographics. Prior to the curtailment, this assumption was reviewed annually based on historical salary increases for participants in the defined benefit pension plans and impacted the service and interest cost components of plan income or expense.
The long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on management’s expectation of earnings on the assets that secure Mattel’s funded defined benefit pension plans, taking into account the mix of invested assets, the arithmetic average of past returns, economic and stock market conditions and future expectations, and the long-term nature of the projected benefit obligation to which these investments relate. The long-term rate of return is used to calculate the expected return on plan assets that is used in calculating pension income or expense. The difference between this expected return and the actual return on plan assets is deferred, net of tax, and is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The net deferral of past asset gains or losses affects the calculated value of plan assets and, ultimately, future pension income or expense. Mattel’s long-term rate of return used in determining plan expense for its domestic defined benefit pension plans was 6.3%6.0% in 2017, as compared to 6.5% in 20162019 and 7.5% during the first half of 2015, revised to 6.8% for the second half of 2015.2018. Assuming all other benefit plan assumptions remain constant, a one percentage point decrease in the expected return on plan assets would result in an increase in benefit plan expense during 20182020 of $3.4$3.0 million.
The health care cost trend rates used by Mattel for its other postretirement benefit plans reflect management’s best estimate of expected claim costs over the next ten years. These trend rates impact the service and interest cost components of plan expense. Rates ranging from 7.8%7.0% in 20172019 to 4.5% in 2024,2025, with rates assumed to stabilize in 20242025 and thereafter, were used in determining plan expense for 2017.2019. These rates are reviewed annually and are estimated based on historical costs for participants in the other postretirement benefit plans as well as estimates based on current economic conditions. As of December 31, 2017,2019, Mattel maintained the health care cost trend rates for its other postretirement benefit plan obligation at 7.0% for participants younger than age 65, and 7.8%6.8% for participants age 65 and older. For all participants, the cost trend rates are estimated to reduce to 4.5% by 2024,2026, with rates assumed to stabilize in 2024.2026. Assuming all other postretirement benefit plan assumptions remain constant, a one percentage point increase in the assumed health care cost trend rates would not result in a materialminimal increase in benefit plan expense during 2018.2020.
A one percentage point increase/(decrease) in the assumed health care cost trend rate for each future year would not materiallyresult in a minimal impact to the postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2017 or2019 and the service and interest cost recognized for 2017.2019.
Share-Based Payments
Mattel recognizes the cost of service-based employee share-based payment awards on a straight-line attribution basis over the requisite employee service period, net of estimated forfeitures. Determining the fair value of share-based awards at the measurement date requires judgment, including estimating the expected term that stock options will be outstanding prior to exercise, the associated volatility, and the expected dividends. With the exception of certain market-based options granted in 2018, which are valued using a Monte Carlo valuation methodology, Mattel estimates the fair value of options granted using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The expected life of the options used in this calculation is the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding and has been determined based on historical exercise experience. Expected stock price volatility is based on the historical volatility of Mattel’s stock for a period approximating the expected life, the expected dividend yield is based on Mattel’s most recent actual annual dividend payout, and the risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues approximating the expected life. Judgment is also required in estimating the amount of share-based awards that will be forfeited prior to vesting. Management believes that these assumptions are "critical accounting estimates" because significant changes in the assumptions used to develop the estimates could materially affect key financial measures, including net income.
There were no market-based options granted during 2019. The weighted average grant dateweighted-average grant-date fair value of market-based options granted during 2018 valued using a Monte Carlo valuation methodology was $4.21. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during 2017, 2016,2019 and 20152018, valued using the Black-Scholes valuation model was $3.37, $4.09,$5.09 and $1.97,$5.46, respectively. The following weighted averageweighted-average assumptions were used in determining the fair value of options granted:
| | | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Expected life (in years) | 5.0 |
| | 5.0 |
| | 4.9 |
| 5.5 |
| | 5.1 |
|
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.8 | % | | 1.1 | % | | 1.5 | % | 1.7 | % | | 2.8 | % |
| Volatility factor | 27.2 | % | | 25.3 | % | | 23.1 | % | 38.1 | % | | 33.6 | % |
| Dividend yield | 4.0 | % | | 4.7 | % | | 6.5 | % | — | % | | — | % |
The following tables summarizessummarize the sensitivity of valuation assumptions within the calculation of stock option fair values, if all other assumptions are held constant:
| | | | Increase in Assumption Factor | | Increase (Decrease) in Fair Value | Increase in Assumption Factor | | Increase (Decrease) in Fair Value |
| Expected life (in years) | 1 year |
| | 4.9 | % | 1 |
| | 8.4 | % |
| Risk-free interest rate | 1 | % | | 8.4 | % | 1 | % | | 4.8 | % |
| Volatility factor | 1 | % | | 3.8 | % | 1 | % | | 2.1 | % |
| Dividend yield | 1 | % | | (12.8 | )% | 1 | % | | (10.0 | )% |
| | | | (Decrease) in Assumption Factor | | Increase (Decrease) in Fair Value | (Decrease) in Assumption Factor | | Increase (Decrease) in Fair Value |
| Expected life (in years) | (1) year |
| | (6.8 | )% | (1) |
| | (9.5 | )% |
| Risk-free interest rate | (1 | )% | | (8.4 | )% | (1 | )% | | (4.9 | )% |
| Volatility factor | (1 | )% | | (4.1 | )% | (1 | )% | | (2.2 | )% |
| Dividend yield | (1 | )% | | 14.2 | % | (1 | )% | | 10.8 | % |
Mattel recognized compensation expense of $14.1 million, $10.5$11.3 million and $15.2$8.4 million for stock options during 2017, 2016,2019 and 2015,2018, respectively, which is included within other selling and administrative expenses. Compensation expense recognized related to grants of restricted stock units ("RSUs"), including performance-based restricted stock units ("Performance RSUs"), was $53.0 million, $43.4$44.6 million and $41.5$40.5 million in 2017, 2016,2019 and 2015,2018, respectively, and is also included within other selling and administrative expenses. As of December 31, 2017,2019, total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based payments totaled $105.5$81.4 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.11.9 years.
Income Taxes
Mattel accounts for income taxes in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 740—Income Taxes. Mattel’s income tax provision and related income tax assets and liabilities are based on actual and expected future income, U.S. and foreign statutory income tax rates, and tax regulations and planning opportunities in the various jurisdictions in which Mattel operates. Management believes that the accounting estimates related to income taxes are "critical accounting estimates" because significant judgment is required in interpreting tax regulations in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions, evaluating Mattel’s worldwide uncertain tax positions, and assessing the likelihood of realizing certain tax benefits. Actual results could differ materially from those judgments, and changes in judgments could materially affect Mattel’s consolidated financial statements.
Certain income and expense items are accounted for differently for financial reporting and income tax purposes. As a result, the income tax expense reflected in Mattel’s consolidated statements of operations is different than that reported in Mattel’s tax returns filed with the taxing authorities. Some of these differences are permanent, such as expenses that are not deductible in Mattel’s tax return, and some are temporary differences that reverse over time, such as depreciation expense. These timing differences create deferred income tax assets and liabilities. Deferred income tax assets generally represent items that can be used as a tax deduction or credit in Mattel’s tax returns in future years for which Mattel has already recorded a tax benefit in its consolidated statements of operations. Mattel records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred income tax assets if, based on the weight of available evidence, management believes expected future taxable income is not likely to support the use of a deduction or credit in that jurisdiction. Management evaluates the level of Mattel’s valuation allowances at least annually, and more frequently if actual operating results differ significantly from forecasted results.
Mattel records unrecognized tax benefits for U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign tax positions related primarily to transfer pricing, tax credits claimed, tax nexus, and apportionment. For each reporting period, management applies a consistent methodology to measure unrecognized tax benefits and all unrecognized tax benefits are reviewed periodically and adjusted as circumstances warrant. Mattel’s measurement of its unrecognized tax benefits is based on management’s assessment of all relevant information, including prior audit experience, the status of audits, conclusions of tax audits, lapsing of applicable statutes of limitations, identification of new issues, and any administrative guidance or developments. Mattel recognizes unrecognized tax benefits in the first financial reporting period in which information becomes available indicating that such benefits will more-likely-than-not (a greater than 50 percent likelihood) be realized.
Mattel’s effective tax rate on loss before income taxes was (108.7)% in 2017, as compared to an effective tax rate on income before income taxes of 22.4% in 2016 and 20.4% in 2015. The income tax provision included net tax expenses of $454.4 million in 2017, and net tax benefits of $16.8 million and $19.1 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively. The 2017 net tax expense primarily relates to the establishment of a valuation allowance in the third quarter of 2017 on U.S. deferred tax assets that will likely not be realized and a provisional estimate of the impact of U.S. Tax Reform in the fourth quarter of 2017. The 2016 net tax benefits primarily relate to reassessments of prior years’ tax liabilities based on the status of audits and tax filings in various jurisdictions around the world, settlements, enacted tax law changes, and the adoption of a new accounting pronouncement. The 2015 net tax benefits primarily relate to reassessments of prior years’ tax liabilities based on the status of audits and tax filings in various jurisdictions around the world, settlements, and enacted tax law changes.
In the normal course of business, Mattel is regularly audited by federal, state, local, and foreign tax authorities. The ultimate settlement of any particular issue with the applicable taxing authority could have a material impact on Mattel’s consolidated financial statements.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies."
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
To supplement the financial results presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP, Mattel presents certain non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The non-
GAAPnon-GAAP financial measures that Mattel presents include currency exchange rate impact and gross sales. Mattel uses these metrics to analyze its continuing operations and to monitor, assess, and identify meaningful trends in its operating and financial performance. Mattel believes that the disclosure of non-GAAP financial measures provides useful supplemental information to investors to be able to better evaluate ongoing business performance and certain components of Mattel's results. These measures are not, and should not be viewed as, substitutes for GAAP financial measures and may not be comparable to similarly-titled measures used by other companies.
Currency Exchange Rate Impact
The currency exchange rate impact reflects the portion (expressed as a percentage) of changes in Mattel's reported results that are attributable to fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
For entities reporting in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, Mattel calculates the percentage change of period-over-period results at constant currency exchange rates (established as described below) by translating current period and prior period results using these rates. It then determines the currency exchange rate impact percentage by calculating the difference between the percentage change at such constant currency exchange rates and the percentage change at actual exchange rates.
The consistentconstant currency exchange rates are determined by Mattel at the beginning of each year and are applied consistently during the year. They are generally different from the actual exchange rates in effect during the current or prior period due to volatility in actual foreign exchange rates. Mattel considers whether any changes to the constant currency rates are appropriate at the beginning of each year. The exchange rates used for these constant currency calculations are generally based on prior year actual exchange rates.
Mattel believes that the disclosure of the percentage impact of foreign currency changes is useful supplemental information for investors to be able to gauge Mattel’s current business performance and the longer termlonger-term strength of its overall business since foreign currency changes could potentially mask underlying sales trends. The disclosure of the percentage impact of foreign exchange allows investors to calculate the impact on a constant currency basis and also enhances their ability to compare financial results from one period to another.
Gross Sales
Gross sales represent sales to customers, excluding the impact of sales adjustments. Net sales, as reported, include the impact of sales adjustments, such as trade discounts and other allowances. Mattel presents changes in gross sales as a metric for comparing its aggregate, brand, and geographic results to highlight significant trends in Mattel’s business. Changes in gross sales are discussed because, while Mattel records the details of such sales adjustments in its financial accounting systems at the time of sale, such sales adjustments are generally not associated with brands and individual products, making net sales less meaningful. Because sales adjustments are not allocated to individual products, net sales are only presented on a consolidated and segment basis and not on a brand level.
Since sales adjustments are determined by customer rather than at the brand level, Mattel believes that the disclosure of gross sales by brand is useful supplemental information for investors to be able to assess the performance of its underlying brands (e.g., Barbie) and also enhances their ability to compare sales trends over time.
A reconciliation from Mattel's consolidated net sales to its consolidated gross sales is as follows:
| | | | For the Year Ended | | 2017 vs 2016 | | 2016 vs 2015 | For the Year Ended | | 2019 vs 2018 | | 2018 vs 2017 |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31, 2015 | | % Change as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact | | % Change as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31, 2017 | | % Change as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact | | % Change as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Net sales | $ | 4,882.0 |
| | $ | 5,456.7 |
| | $ | 5,702.6 |
| | -11 | % | | — | % | | -4 | % | | -2 | % | $ | 4,504.6 |
| | $ | 4,514.8 |
| | $ | 4,881.5 |
| | — | % | | -1 | % | | -8 | % | | -1 | % |
| Sales adjustments | 632.2 |
| | 617.0 |
| | 581.0 |
| | | | | | | | | 560.0 |
| | 560.7 |
| | 632.6 |
| | | | | | | | |
| Gross sales | $ | 5,514.1 |
| | $ | 6,073.7 |
| | $ | 6,283.6 |
| | -9 | % | | 1 | % | | -3 | % | | -3 | % | $ | 5,064.6 |
| | $ | 5,075.5 |
| | $ | 5,514.1 |
| | — | % | | -2 | % | | -8 | % | | -1 | % |
A reconciliation from net sales to gross sales for the North America segment is as follows:
| | | | For the Year Ended | | 2017 vs 2016 | | 2016 vs 2015 | For the Year Ended | | 2019 vs 2018 | | 2018 vs 2017 |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31, 2015 | | % Change as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact | | % Change as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31, 2017 | | % Change as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact | | % Change as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Net sales | $ | 2,373.9 |
| | $ | 2,837.8 |
| | $ | 2,891.1 |
| | -16 | % | | — | % | | -2 | % | | — | % | $ | 2,275.8 |
| | $ | 2,272.8 |
| | $ | 2,373.9 |
| | — | % | | — | % | | -4 | % | | — | % |
| Sales adjustments | 162.8 |
| | 198.4 |
| | 192.8 |
| | | | | | | | | 156.5 |
| | 149.3 |
| | 162.8 |
| | | | | | | | |
| Gross sales | $ | 2,536.7 |
| | $ | 3,036.2 |
| | $ | 3,083.9 |
| | -16 | % | | 1 | % | | -2 | % | | -1 | % | $ | 2,432.3 |
| | $ | 2,422.1 |
| | $ | 2,536.7 |
| | — | % | | -1 | % | | -5 | % | | -1 | % |
A reconciliation from net sales to gross sales for the International segment is as follows:
| | | | For the Year Ended | | 2017 vs 2016 | | 2016 vs 2015 | For the Year Ended | | 2019 vs 2018 | | 2018 vs 2017 |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31, 2015 | | % Change as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact | | % Change as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31, 2017 | | % Change as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact | | % Change as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Net sales | $ | 2,060.8 |
| | $ | 2,054.8 |
| | $ | 2,241.5 |
| | — | % | | 1 | % | | -8 | % | | -6 | % | $ | 1,972.2 |
| | $ | 1,915.2 |
| | $ | 2,060.4 |
| | 3 | % | | -4 | % | | -7 | % | | -2 | % |
| Sales adjustments | 442.7 |
| | 392.8 |
| | 362.0 |
| | | | | | | | | 391.6 |
| | 397.1 |
| | 443.1 |
| | | | | | | | |
| Gross sales | $ | 2,503.5 |
| | $ | 2,447.6 |
| | $ | 2,603.5 |
| | 2 | % | | 2 | % | | -6 | % | | -7 | % | $ | 2,363.8 |
| | $ | 2,312.2 |
| | $ | 2,503.5 |
| | 2 | % | | -4 | % | | -8 | % | | -2 | % |
A reconciliation from net sales to gross sales for the American Girl segment is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | 2017 vs 2016 | | 2016 vs 2015 |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31, 2015 | | % Change as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact | | % Change as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Net Sales | $ | 447.2 |
| | $ | 564.1 |
| | $ | 570.0 |
| | -21 | % | | — | % | | -1 | % | | — | % |
| Sales adjustments | 26.7 |
| | 25.8 |
| | 26.2 |
| | | | | | | | |
| Gross Sales | $ | 473.9 |
| | $ | 589.9 |
| | $ | 596.2 |
| | -20 | % | | — | % | | -1 | % | | — | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended | | 2019 vs 2018 | | 2018 vs 2017 |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31, 2017 | | % Change as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact | | % Change as Reported | | Currency Exchange Rate Impact |
| | (In millions, except percentage information) |
| Net sales | $ | 256.6 |
| | $ | 326.8 |
| | $ | 447.2 |
| | -21 | % | | — | % | | -27 | % | | — | % |
| Sales adjustments | 11.9 |
| | 14.4 |
| | 26.7 |
| | | | | | | | |
| Gross sales | $ | 268.5 |
| | $ | 341.2 |
| | $ | 473.9 |
| | -21 | % | | — | % | | -28 | % | | — | % |
| |
| Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
Currency exchange rate fluctuations may impact Mattel’s results of operations and cash flows. Inventory transactions denominated in the Euro, Mexican peso, British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, Australian dollar,Russian ruble, Brazilian real, and Russian rubleAustralian dollar were the primary transactions that caused foreign currency transaction exposure for Mattel in 2017.2019. Mattel seeks to mitigate its exposure to market risk by monitoring its foreign currency transaction exposure for the year and partially hedging such exposure using foreign currency forward exchange contracts primarily to hedge its purchase and sale of inventory and other intercompany transactions denominated in foreign currencies. These contracts generally have maturity dates of up to 18 months. For those intercompany receivables and payables that are not hedged, the transaction gains or losses are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations in the period in which the exchange rate changes as part of operating (loss) income or other non-operating income/expense, net based on the nature of the underlying transaction. Transaction gains or losses on hedged intercompany inventory transactions are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations in the period in which the inventory is sold to customers. In addition, Mattel manages its exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations through the selection of currencies used for international borrowings. Mattel does not trade in financial instruments for speculative purposes.
Mattel’s financial position is also impacted by currency exchange rate fluctuations on translation of its net investments in subsidiaries with non-U.S. dollar functional currencies. Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries with non-U.S. dollar functional currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at fiscal year-end exchange rates. Income, expense, and cash flow items are translated at weighted averageweighted-average exchange rates prevailing during the fiscal year. The resulting currency translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss within stockholders’ equity. Mattel’s primary currency translation exposures in 20172019 were related to its net investments in entities having functional currencies denominated in the Euro, and British pound sterling.sterling, Russian ruble, and Mexican peso.
There are numerous factors impacting the amount by which Mattel’s financial results are affected by foreign currency translation and transaction gains and losses resulting from changes in currency exchange rates, including, but not limited to, the level of foreign currency forward exchange contracts in place at a given time and the volume of foreign currency-denominated transactions in a given period. However, assuming that such factors were held constant, Mattel estimates that a 1 percent change in the U.S. dollar Trade-Weighted Index would impact Mattel’s net sales by approximately 0.5% and its full year loss per share by approximately $0.01$0.00 to $0.03.$0.01.
Mattel’s foreign currency forward exchange contracts that were used to hedge firm foreign currency commitments as of December 31, 20172019 are shown below. All contracts in the following table are against the U.S. dollar and are maintained by reporting units with a U.S. dollar functional currency, with the exception of the Indonesian rupiah contracts, which are maintained by entities with an Indonesian rupiah functional currency.
| | | | Buy | | Sell | Buy | | Sell |
| | Contract Amount | | Weighted Average Contract Rate | | Fair Value | | Contract Amount | | Weighted Average Contract Rate | | Fair Value | Contract Amount | | Weighted Average Contract Rate | | Fair Value | | Contract Amount | | Weighted Average Contract Rate | | Fair Value |
| | (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except for rates) | (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except for rates) |
| Australian dollar* | $ | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 87,807 |
| | 0.77 |
| | $ | (1,492 | ) | |
| British pound sterling* | 61,385 |
| | 1.34 |
| | 565 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Canadian dollar* | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 53,948 |
| | 0.78 |
| | (1,358 | ) | |
| Australian dollar (a) | | $ | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 41,031 |
| | 0.70 |
| | $ | (14 | ) |
| British pound sterling (a) | | 53,368 |
| | 1.30 |
| | 1,089 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Canadian dollar (a) | | 6,106 |
| | 0.76 |
| | 55 |
| | 44,693 |
| | 0.76 |
| | (571 | ) |
| Chinese renminbi | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Czech koruna | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,011 |
| | 21.60 |
| | (10 | ) | 4,719 |
| | 22.90 |
| | 56 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Danish krone | 2,604 |
| | 6.24 |
| | 19 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 2,722 |
| | 6.72 |
| | 27 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Euro* | 294,417 |
| | 1.19 |
| | 2,630 |
| | 224,669 |
| | 1.13 |
| | (15,620 | ) | |
| Euro (a) | | 109,316 |
| | 1.11 |
| | 1,096 |
| | 226,635 |
| | 1.18 |
| | 9,987 |
|
| Hungarian forint | 3,654 |
| | 260.06 |
| | 29 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 5,546 |
| | 297.61 |
| | 63 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Indonesian rupiah | 18,653 |
| | 14,302.65 |
| | 804 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 8,548 |
| | 14,769.30 |
| | 497 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Japanese yen | 2,654 |
| | 113.05 |
| | 10 |
| | 4,974 |
| | 113.11 |
| | (14 | ) | 5,782 |
| | 109.49 |
| | 52 |
| | 277 |
| | 109.53 |
| | (2 | ) |
| Mexican peso | 37,162 |
| | 19.79 |
| | 346 |
| | 1,500 |
| | 20.25 |
| | (37 | ) | 28,546 |
| | 18.97 |
| | 67 |
| | 8,865 |
| | 19.32 |
| | (139 | ) |
| New Zealand dollar* | 14,897 |
| | 0.71 |
| | 121 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| New Zealand dollar (a) | | 8,154 |
| | 0.67 |
| | 102 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Polish zloty | 6,786 |
| | 3.51 |
| | 80 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 22,358 |
| | 3.83 |
| | 271 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Russian ruble | 89,244 |
| | 57.75 |
| | 723 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 61,487 |
| | 62.30 |
| | 456 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Singapore dollar | 9,539 |
| | 1.35 |
| | 180 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 11,652 |
| | 1.35 |
| | 94 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| South African rand | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7,033 |
| | 14.14 |
| | (24 | ) |
| Swiss franc | 19,195 |
| | 0.99 |
| | 256 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 22,187 |
| | 0.98 |
| | 356 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Turkish lira | 7,568 |
| | 3.82 |
| | 93 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,474 |
| | 5.96 |
| | 16 |
|
| | $ | 567,758 |
| | | | $ | 5,856 |
| | $ | 373,909 |
| | | | $ | (18,531 | ) | $ | 350,491 |
| | | | $ | 4,281 |
| | $ | 335,008 |
| | | | $ | 9,253 |
|
* The weighted average contract rate for these contracts is quoted in U.S. dollar per local currency. | |
| (a) | The weighted-average contract rate for these contracts is quoted in U.S. dollar per local currency. |
For the purchase of foreign currencies, fair value reflects the amount, based on dealer quotes, that Mattel would pay at maturity for contracts involving the same notional amounts, currencies, and maturity dates, if they had been entered into as of December 31, 2017.2019. For the sale of foreign currencies, fair value reflects the amount, based on dealer quotes, that Mattel would receive at maturity for contracts involving the same notional amounts, currencies, and maturity dates, if they had been entered into as of December 31, 2017.2019. The differences between the market forward amounts and the contract amounts are expected to be fully offset by currency transaction gains and losses on the underlying hedged transactions.
In addition to the contracts involving the U.S. dollar detailed in the above table, Mattel also had contracts to sell British pound sterling for the purchase of Euro. As of December 31, 2017,2019, these contracts had a contract amount of $46.1$56.5 million and a fair value of $1.2 million.
$(1.8 million).
Had Mattel not entered into hedges to limit the effect of currency exchange rate fluctuations on its results of operations and cash flows, its loss before income taxes would have increased by approximately $54$20 million in 2017,2019 and its income before income taxes would have decreased by approximately $7$32 million in 2016 and increased by approximately $6 million in 2015.
Venezuelan Operations
Since January 1, 2010, Mattel has accounted for Venezuela as a highly inflationary economy as the three-year cumulative inflation rate for Venezuela exceeded 100%. Accordingly, Mattel’s Venezuelan subsidiary uses the U.S. dollar as its functional currency, and monetary assets and liabilities denominated in Venezuelan bolívar fuerte ("BsF") generate income or expense for changes in value associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations against the U.S. dollar. From January 2010 through January 2013, Mattel’s Venezuelan subsidiary used the Sistema de Transacciones con Títulos en Moneda Extranjera ("SITME") rate, which was quoted at 5.30 BsF per U.S. dollar as of December 31, 2012, to remeasure monetary assets and liabilities denominated in BsF. During February 2013, the Central Bank of Venezuela revised its official exchange rate to 6.30 BsF per U.S. dollar and eliminated the SITME rate.
During March 2013, the Venezuelan government introduced a complementary currency exchange system, the Sistema Complementario de Administración de Divisas 1 ("SICAD 1"). SICAD 1 was intended to function as an auction system, allowing entities in specific sectors to bid for U.S. dollars to be used for specified import transactions. During February 2014, the Venezuelan government introduced an additional currency exchange system, the Sistema Complementario de Administración de Divisas 2 ("SICAD 2"), which was expected to provide a greater supply of U.S. dollars from sources other than the Venezuelan government and increase participation to all sectors and companies.
During February 2015, the Venezuelan government announced the launch of a new three-tiered currency exchange platform, which included a new exchange system called the Marginal Currency System ("SIMADI"). The first tier was used for food, medicine, agriculture, and other essential goods and used an official exchange rate of 6.30 BsF per U.S. dollar. The second tier was a merger of the SICAD 1 and SICAD 2 systems, which held periodic auctions for entities in specific sectors. The third tier was the new SIMADI system, which was intended to be a market-driven exchange that allowed for legal trading of foreign currency based on supply and demand.
During March 2016, the Venezuelan government further revised its currency exchange platform to a dual system. The SICAD rate merged with the official exchange rate, becoming the new Tipo de Cambio Protegido ("DIPRO") exchange rate, which was fixed at 10.00 BsF per U.S. dollar. The existing SIMADI rate was renamed the Tipo de Cambio Complementario ("DICOM") exchange rate. The DIPRO rate is used for essential imports, such as food and medicine, whereas the DICOM rate is used for all other transactions. During the first quarter of 2016, Mattel changed its remeasurement rate from the official exchange rate to the new DICOM exchange rate. The change in the remeasurement rate resulted in an unrealized foreign currency exchange loss of approximately $26 million, which was recognized in other non-operating expense/income, net in the consolidated statements of operations in the first quarter of 2016.
During May 2017, the Venezuelan government initiated an auction mechanism within the DICOM exchange rate system, which was not accessed by Mattel. During December 2017, Mattel initiated actions to discontinue operations in Venezuela and concluded that its Venezuelan subsidiary had been substantially liquidated. In connection with the substantial liquidation, Mattel recognized a $59.0 million loss in other non-operating expense/income, net in the consolidated statements of operations related to the associated cumulative translation adjustments.2018.
United Kingdom Operations
During June 2016, the referendum by British voters to exit the European UnionEU ("Brexit") adversely impacted global markets and resulted in a sharp decline of the British pound sterling against the U.S. dollar. In February 2017, the British Parliament voted in favor of allowing the British government to begin the formal process of Brexit and discussions with the European UnionEU began in March 2017. On January 29, 2020, the British Parliament approved a withdrawal agreement, and the United Kingdom ("U.K.") officially withdrew from the EU on January 31, 2020 and entered into the transition period. During the transition period, the U.K. will continue to be treated as a member of the single market and customs union and the EU has requested that states with EU trade agreements treat the U.K. as a member state until the end of transition. The transition period is through December 2020, with an option to extend an additional one to two years, to allow for businesses and individuals to adjust to its changes, during which all EU regulations will continue to apply to the U.K.
In the short-term, volatility in the British pound sterling could continue as the United KingdomU.K. negotiates its anticipated exit froma new trade deal with the European Union.EU. In the longer term, any impact from Brexit on Mattel's United KingdomU.K. operations will depend, in part, on the outcome of tariff, trade, regulatory, and other negotiations. Mattel's United KingdomU.K. operations represented approximately 4%5% of Mattel's consolidated net sales for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019.
Argentina Operations
Effective July 1, 2018, Mattel accounted for Argentina as a highly inflationary economy, as the projected three-year cumulative inflation rate exceeded 100%. As such, beginning July 1, 2018, Mattel's Argentina subsidiary has designated the U.S. dollar as its functional currency. Mattel’s Argentina subsidiary represented less than 1% of Mattel's consolidated net sales for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
| |
| Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. |
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)). Mattel’s management, including Margaret H. Georgiadis,Ynon Kreiz, its principal executive officer, and Joseph J. Euteneuer, its principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of Mattel’s internal control over financial reporting using the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that Mattel’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.2019. The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172019 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To theBoard of Directors and Stockholders of Mattel, Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Mattel, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income,loss, stockholders' equity and cash flows and stockholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, including the related notes and schedule of valuation and qualifying accounts and allowances for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20172019 appearing under Item 16after the signature and power of attorney pages (collectively referred to as the "consolidated“consolidated financial statements"statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20172019 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management'sManagement’s Report on Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB")(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the
company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Goodwill Impairment Test- American Girl Reporting Unit
As described in Notes 1 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated goodwill balance was $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2019, and the goodwill associated with the American Girl reporting unit was $207.6 million. Management tests goodwill for impairment annually in the third quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a reporting unit may exceed its fair value. As disclosed by management, the fair value of the American Girl reporting unit is estimated based upon the discounted cash flows that the reporting unit is expected to generate in the future (the "income approach"). The income approach includes various projections such as expected sales growth, gross margin, operating costs, working capital investment, and discount rate for the American Girl reporting unit.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the goodwill impairment test of the American Girl reporting unit is a critical audit matter are there was significant judgment by management when developing the fair value measurement of the American Girl reporting unit, which in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and audit effort in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence relating to management’s fair value estimate and significant assumptions, including projections of expected sales growth rate, gross margin and operating costs, and the discount rate. In addition, the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s goodwill impairment test, including controls over the valuation of the Company’s reporting units.These procedures alsoincluded, among others (i) testing management’s process for developing the fair value estimate of the American Girl reporting unit, (ii) evaluating the appropriateness of the discounted cash flow model, (iii) testing the completeness, accuracy, and relevance of underlying data used in the model, and (iv) evaluating the significant assumptions used by management, including the projections of expected sales growth rate, gross margin and operating costs, and the discount rate. Evaluating management’s assumptions related to projections of expected sales growth rate, gross margin and operating costs involved evaluating whether the assumptions used by management were reasonable considering the current and past performance of the American Girl reporting unit and whether these assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in evaluating the model and certain significant assumptions, including the discount rate.
Sales Adjustments Accrual - Discretionary Component
As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company routinely enters into arrangements with its customers to provide sales incentives, support customer promotions, and provide allowances for returns or defective merchandise. Accruals for these programs are recorded as sales adjustments that reduce gross sales in the period the related sale is recognized. As disclosed by management, sales adjustments for such programs totaled $560.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The accrual for such programs, which can either be contractual or discretionary in nature, is based on an assessment of customer purchases, customer performance of specified promotional activities, and other specified factors such as customer sales volume. While the majority of sales adjustment amounts are readily determinable at period end and do not require estimates, certain of the sales adjustments (i.e., discretionary sales adjustments) require management to make estimates. In making these estimates, management considers all available information, including the overall business environment, historical trends, and information from customers.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the discretionary component of the sales adjustments accrual is a critical audit matter are there was significant judgment by management in estimating the
discretionary component, which in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and audit effort in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence relating to management’s estimate of the discretionary component of the sales adjustments accrual.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the completeness and accuracy of the discretionary component of the sales adjustments accrual.These procedures also included, among others (i) testing management’s process for developing the discretionary component of the sales adjustments accrual, (ii) evaluating the appropriateness of the assumptions used by management to develop the discretionary component of the sales adjustments accrual, including evaluating the completeness and appropriateness of information considered in developing the discretionary component of the sales adjustments accrual, (iii) testing the completeness, accuracy, and relevance of underlying data used in developing the discretionary component of the sales adjustments accrual, (iv) considering the results of a retrospective comparison of sales adjustments accrued in the prior year to settlements in the current year, and (v) testing settlements subsequent to year-end.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 27, 201825, 2020
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1974.
MATTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | | | | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 |
| | (In thousands, except share data) | (In thousands, except share data) |
| ASSETS | | | | | | |
| Current Assets | | | | | | |
| Cash and equivalents | $ | 1,079,221 |
| | $ | 869,531 |
| $ | 630,028 |
| | $ | 594,481 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $25.4 million and $21.4 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively | 1,128,610 |
| | 1,115,217 |
| |
| Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $18.5 million and $22.0 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively | | 936,359 |
| | 970,083 |
|
| Inventories | 600,704 |
| | 613,798 |
| 495,504 |
| | 542,889 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 303,053 |
| | 341,518 |
| 186,083 |
| | 239,747 |
|
| Total current assets | 3,111,588 |
| | 2,940,064 |
| 2,247,974 |
| | 2,347,200 |
|
| Noncurrent Assets | | | | | | |
| Property, plant, and equipment, net | 785,285 |
| | 773,965 |
| 550,139 |
| | 657,595 |
|
| Right-of-use assets, net | | 303,187 |
| | — |
|
| Goodwill | 1,396,669 |
| | 1,387,628 |
| 1,390,714 |
| | 1,386,424 |
|
| Other noncurrent assets | 944,961 |
| | 1,392,137 |
| 833,212 |
| | 847,006 |
|
| Total Assets | $ | 6,238,503 |
| | $ | 6,493,794 |
| $ | 5,325,226 |
| | $ | 5,238,225 |
|
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | |
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | |
| Current Liabilities | | | | | | |
| Short-term borrowings | $ | — |
| | $ | 192,168 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 4,176 |
|
| Current portion of long-term debt | 250,000 |
| | — |
| |
| Accounts payable | 572,166 |
| | 664,857 |
| 459,357 |
| | 537,965 |
|
| Accrued liabilities | 792,139 |
| | 628,826 |
| 769,513 |
| | 694,271 |
|
| Income taxes payable | 9,498 |
| | 19,722 |
| 48,037 |
| | 13,520 |
|
| Total current liabilities | 1,623,803 |
| | 1,505,573 |
| 1,276,907 |
| | 1,249,932 |
|
| Noncurrent Liabilities | | | | | | |
| Long-term debt | 2,873,119 |
| | 2,134,271 |
| 2,846,751 |
| | 2,851,723 |
|
| Noncurrent lease liabilities | | 270,853 |
| | — |
|
| Other noncurrent liabilities | 484,126 |
| | 446,168 |
| 439,001 |
| | 469,669 |
|
| Total noncurrent liabilities | 3,357,245 |
| | 2,580,439 |
| 3,556,605 |
| | 3,321,392 |
|
| Commitments and Contingencies (See Note 11) |
| |
| |
| Commitments and Contingencies (See Note 12) | |
| |
|
| Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | |
| Common stock $1.00 par value, 1.0 billion shares authorized; 441.4 million shares issued | 441,369 |
| | 441,369 |
| 441,369 |
| | 441,369 |
|
| Additional paid-in capital | 1,808,391 |
| | 1,790,832 |
| 1,825,569 |
| | 1,812,682 |
|
| Treasury stock at cost: 97.6 million shares and 99.0 million shares in 2017 and 2016, respectively | (2,389,877 | ) | | (2,426,749 | ) | |
| Treasury stock at cost: 94.6 million shares and 96.1 million shares in 2019 and 2018, respectively | | (2,318,921 | ) | | (2,354,617 | ) |
| Retained earnings | 2,179,358 |
| | 3,545,359 |
| 1,413,181 |
| | 1,626,693 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (781,786 | ) | | (943,029 | ) | (869,484 | ) | | (859,226 | ) |
| Total stockholders’ equity | 1,257,455 |
| | 2,407,782 |
| 491,714 |
| | 666,901 |
|
| Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | $ | 6,238,503 |
| | $ | 6,493,794 |
| $ | 5,325,226 |
| | $ | 5,238,225 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
MATTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
| | | | For the Year Ended | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| | (In thousands, except per share amounts) | (In thousands, except per share amounts) |
| Net Sales | $ | 4,881,951 |
| | $ | 5,456,650 |
| | $ | 5,702,613 |
| $ | 4,504,571 |
| | $ | 4,514,810 |
| | $ | 4,881,493 |
|
| Cost of sales | 3,061,122 |
| | 2,902,259 |
| | 2,896,255 |
| 2,523,792 |
| | 2,716,127 |
| | 3,056,922 |
|
| Gross Profit | 1,820,829 |
| | 2,554,391 |
| | 2,806,358 |
| 1,980,779 |
| | 1,798,683 |
| | 1,824,571 |
|
| Advertising and promotion expenses | 642,286 |
| | 634,947 |
| | 717,852 |
| 551,517 |
| | 524,288 |
| | 642,286 |
|
| Other selling and administrative expenses | 1,521,366 |
| | 1,400,211 |
| | 1,547,584 |
| 1,390,022 |
| | 1,508,744 |
| | 1,517,983 |
|
| Operating (Loss) Income | (342,823 | ) | | 519,233 |
| | 540,922 |
| |
| Operating Income (Loss) | | 39,240 |
| | (234,349 | ) | | (335,698 | ) |
| Interest expense | 105,214 |
| | 95,118 |
| | 85,270 |
| 201,044 |
| | 181,886 |
| | 105,214 |
|
| Interest (income) | (7,777 | ) | | (9,144 | ) | | (7,230 | ) | (6,166 | ) | | (6,463 | ) | | (7,777 | ) |
| Other non-operating expense (income), net | 64,727 |
| | 23,517 |
| | (1,033 | ) | |
| (Loss) Income Before Income Taxes | (504,987 | ) | | 409,742 |
| | 463,915 |
| |
| Other non-operating expense, net | | 2,650 |
| | 7,331 |
| | 68,110 |
|
| Loss Before Income Taxes | | (158,288 | ) | | (417,103 | ) | | (501,245 | ) |
| Provision for income taxes | 548,849 |
| | 91,720 |
| | 94,499 |
| 55,224 |
| | 116,196 |
| | 553,334 |
|
| Net (Loss) Income | $ | (1,053,836 | ) | | $ | 318,022 |
| | $ | 369,416 |
| |
| Net (Loss) Income Per Common Share—Basic | $ | (3.07 | ) | | $ | 0.93 |
| | $ | 1.08 |
| |
| Net Loss | | $ | (213,512 | ) | | $ | (533,299 | ) | | $ | (1,054,579 | ) |
| Net Loss Per Common Share - Basic | | $ | (0.62 | ) | | $ | (1.55 | ) | | $ | (3.07 | ) |
| Weighted average number of common shares | 343,564 |
| | 341,480 |
| | 339,172 |
| 346,127 |
| | 345,012 |
| | 343,564 |
|
| Net (Loss) Income Per Common Share—Diluted | $ | (3.07 | ) | | $ | 0.92 |
| | $ | 1.08 |
| |
| Net Loss Per Common Share - Diluted | | $ | (0.62 | ) | | $ | (1.55 | ) | | $ | (3.07 | ) |
| Weighted average number of common and potential common shares | 343,564 |
| | 344,233 |
| | 339,748 |
| 346,127 |
| | 345,012 |
| | 343,564 |
|
| Dividends Declared Per Common Share | $ | 0.91 |
| | $ | 1.52 |
| | $ | 1.52 |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
MATTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOMELOSS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Net (Loss) Income | $ | (1,053,836 | ) | | $ | 318,022 |
| | $ | 369,416 |
|
| Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax: | | | | | |
| Currency translation adjustments | 191,267 |
| | (101,539 | ) | | (213,797 | ) |
| Defined benefit pension plan adjustments | 14,491 |
| | 2,154 |
| | 1,649 |
|
| Net unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale security | (5,948 | ) | | 3,149 |
| | — |
|
| Net unrealized (losses) gains on derivative instruments: | | | | | |
| Unrealized holding (losses) gains | (55,377 | ) | | 18,733 |
| | 37,926 |
|
| Reclassification adjustment for realized losses (gains) included in net (loss) income | 16,810 |
| | (16,627 | ) | | (52,588 | ) |
| | (38,567 | ) | | 2,106 |
| | (14,662 | ) |
| Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax | 161,243 |
| | (94,130 | ) | | (226,810 | ) |
| Comprehensive (Loss) Income | $ | (892,593 | ) | | $ | 223,892 |
| | $ | 142,606 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Net Loss | $ | (213,512 | ) | | $ | (533,299 | ) | | $ | (1,054,579 | ) |
| Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, Net of Tax | | | | | |
| Currency translation adjustments | 18,919 |
| | (106,651 | ) | | 191,267 |
|
| Defined benefit pension plan adjustments | (27,094 | ) | | 450 |
| | 14,491 |
|
| Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale security | (1,713 | ) | | (3,748 | ) | | (5,948 | ) |
| Net unrealized (losses) gains on derivative instruments: | | | | | |
| Unrealized holding gains (losses) | 17,024 |
| | 24,082 |
| | (55,377 | ) |
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | (17,394 | ) | | 8,427 |
| | 16,810 |
|
| | (370 | ) | | 32,509 |
| | (38,567 | ) |
| Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, Net of Tax | (10,258 | ) | | (77,440 | ) | | 161,243 |
|
| Comprehensive Loss | $ | (223,770 | ) | | $ | (610,739 | ) | | $ | (893,336 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
MATTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | | | | | |
| Net (loss) income | $ | (1,053,836 | ) | | $ | 318,022 |
| | $ | 369,416 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
| Depreciation | 240,818 |
| | 235,797 |
| | 233,025 |
|
| Amortization | 33,949 |
| | 26,543 |
| | 32,402 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | (19,840 | ) | | 1,236 |
| | 4,133 |
|
| Share-based compensation | 67,119 |
| | 53,950 |
| | 56,691 |
|
| Asset impairments | 56,324 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Loss on discontinuation of Venezuelan operations | 58,973 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Inventory obsolescence | 127,592 |
| | 31,455 |
| | 33,305 |
|
| Valuation allowance on U.S. deferred tax assets and U.S. tax reform | 456,642 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Increase (decrease) from changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquired assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable | 13,626 |
| | (24,033 | ) | | (136,259 | ) |
| Inventories | (91,644 | ) | | (68,650 | ) | | (107,567 | ) |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 33,681 |
| | 34,754 |
| | (36,865 | ) |
| Accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and income taxes payable | 98,044 |
| | 9,006 |
| | 248,047 |
|
| Other, net | (49,062 | ) | | (23,571 | ) | | 38,229 |
|
| Net cash flows (used for) provided by operating activities | (27,614 | ) | | 594,509 |
| | 734,557 |
|
| Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | | | | | |
| Purchases of tools, dies, and molds | (128,940 | ) | | (140,124 | ) | | (142,363 | ) |
| Purchases of other property, plant, and equipment | (168,219 | ) | | (122,069 | ) | | (111,818 | ) |
| Payments for acquisition, net of cash acquired | — |
| | (33,154 | ) | | — |
|
| Proceeds from (payments for) foreign currency forward exchange contracts | 60,993 |
| | (6,103 | ) | | (61,509 | ) |
| Other, net | 503 |
| | (10,460 | ) | | 33,195 |
|
| Net cash flows used for investing activities | (235,663 | ) | | (311,910 | ) | | (282,495 | ) |
| Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | | | | | |
| Payments of short-term borrowings, net | (1,611,586 | ) | | (83,914 | ) | | — |
|
| Proceeds from short-term borrowings, net | 1,419,418 |
| | 259,168 |
| | 16,914 |
|
| Payments of long-term borrowings | — |
| | (300,000 | ) | | — |
|
| Proceeds from long-term borrowings, net | 988,622 |
| | 350,000 |
| | — |
|
| Payment of dividends on common stock | (311,973 | ) | | (518,529 | ) | | (515,073 | ) |
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 1,775 |
| | 34,065 |
| | 14,995 |
|
| Other, net | (27,806 | ) | | (22,261 | ) | | (17,058 | ) |
| Net cash flows provided by (used for) financing activities | 458,450 |
| | (281,471 | ) | | (500,222 | ) |
| Effect of Currency Exchange Rate Changes on Cash | 14,517 |
| | (24,411 | ) | | (30,676 | ) |
| Increase (decrease) in Cash and Equivalents | 209,690 |
| | (23,283 | ) | | (78,836 | ) |
| Cash and Equivalents at Beginning of Year | 869,531 |
| | 892,814 |
| | 971,650 |
|
| Cash and Equivalents at End of Year | $ | 1,079,221 |
| | $ | 869,531 |
| | $ | 892,814 |
|
| Supplemental Cash Flow Information: | | | | | |
| Cash paid during the year for: | | | | | |
| Income taxes, gross | $ | 117,690 |
| | $ | 113,022 |
| | $ | 120,232 |
|
| Interest | 103,339 |
| | 84,763 |
| | 83,005 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | | | | | |
| Net loss | $ | (213,512 | ) | | $ | (533,299 | ) | | $ | (1,054,579 | ) |
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows provided by (used for) operating activities: | | | | | |
| Depreciation | 204,406 |
| | 232,837 |
| | 240,818 |
|
| Amortization | 40,112 |
| | 39,095 |
| | 33,949 |
|
| Share-based compensation | 55,968 |
| | 48,915 |
| | 67,119 |
|
| Bad debt expense | 967 |
| | 40,894 |
| | 17,568 |
|
| Inventory obsolescence | 75,139 |
| | 74,974 |
| | 127,592 |
|
| Asset impairments | 38,729 |
| | 18,203 |
| | 56,324 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | (22,625 | ) | | 13,349 |
| | (18,010 | ) |
| Indefinite reinvestment assertion and U.S. Tax Act | — |
| | 18,275 |
| | (107,049 | ) |
| Establishment of valuation allowance on U.S. deferred tax assets | — |
| | — |
| | 566,346 |
|
| Loss on discontinuation of Venezuelan operations | — |
| | — |
| | 58,973 |
|
| Changes in assets and liabilities: |
| |
| |
|
| Accounts receivable | 41,029 |
| | 72,415 |
| | (3,484 | ) |
| Inventories | (26,920 | ) | | (53,840 | ) | | (91,644 | ) |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 47,971 |
| | 54,230 |
| | 33,681 |
|
| Accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and income taxes payable | (58,679 | ) | | (47,397 | ) | | 93,844 |
|
| Other, net | (1,608 | ) | | (5,968 | ) | | (49,062 | ) |
| Net cash flows provided by (used for) operating activities | 180,977 |
| | (27,317 | ) | | (27,614 | ) |
| Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
| |
| |
|
| Purchases of tools, dies, and molds | (50,509 | ) | | (74,662 | ) | | (128,940 | ) |
| Purchases of other property, plant, and equipment | (65,843 | ) | | (77,752 | ) | | (168,219 | ) |
| (Payments for) proceeds from foreign currency forward exchange contracts | (681 | ) | | (18,615 | ) | | 60,993 |
|
| Other, net | 2,857 |
| | 10,271 |
| | 503 |
|
| Net cash flows used for investing activities | (114,176 | ) | | (160,758 | ) | | (235,663 | ) |
| Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | | | | | |
| Payments of short-term borrowings, net | (4,176 | ) | | — |
| | (1,611,586 | ) |
| Proceeds from short-term borrowings, net | — |
| | 4,176 |
| | 1,419,418 |
|
| Payments of long-term borrowings | (607,898 | ) | | (750,000 | ) | | — |
|
| Proceeds from long-term borrowings, net | 588,244 |
| | 471,797 |
| | 988,622 |
|
| Payments of dividends on common stock | — |
| | — |
| | (311,973 | ) |
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options | — |
| | — |
| | 1,775 |
|
| Other, net | (9,308 | ) | | (11,130 | ) | | (27,806 | ) |
| Net cash flows (used for) provided by financing activities | (33,138 | ) | | (285,157 | ) | | 458,450 |
|
| Effect of Currency Exchange Rate Changes on Cash | 1,884 |
| | (11,508 | ) | | 14,517 |
|
| Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Equivalents | 35,547 |
| | (484,740 | ) | | 209,690 |
|
| Cash and Equivalents at Beginning of Period | 594,481 |
| | 1,079,221 |
| | 869,531 |
|
| Cash and Equivalents at End of Period | $ | 630,028 |
| | $ | 594,481 |
| | $ | 1,079,221 |
|
| Supplemental Cash Flow Information: | | | | | |
| Cash paid during the year for: | | | | | |
| Income taxes, gross | $ | 72,647 |
| | $ | 99,586 |
| | $ | 117,690 |
|
| Interest | 190,922 |
| | 173,951 |
| | 103,339 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
MATTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
| | | | Common Stock | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | Treasury Stock | | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Total Stockholders’ Equity | Common
Stock | | Additional
Paid-In
Capital | | Treasury
Stock | | Retained
Earnings | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss | | Total
Stockholders’
Equity |
| | (In thousands) | (In thousands) |
| Balance, December 31, 2014 | $ | 441,369 |
| | $ | 1,767,096 |
| | $ | (2,533,566 | ) | | $ | 3,896,261 |
| | $ | (622,089 | ) | | $ | 2,949,071 |
| |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 369,416 |
| | — |
| | 369,416 |
| |
| Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (226,810 | ) | | (226,810 | ) | |
| Issuance of treasury stock for stock option exercises | — |
| | (3,822 | ) | | 18,820 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 14,998 |
| |
| Issuance of treasury stock for restricted stock units vesting | — |
| | (28,425 | ) | | 19,345 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (9,080 | ) | |
| Deferred compensation | — |
| | — |
| | 500 |
| | (500 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| |
| Share-based compensation | — |
| | 56,691 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 56,691 |
| |
| Tax deficiencies from share-based payment arrangements | — |
| | (2,780 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,780 | ) | |
| Dividend equivalents for restricted stock units | — |
| | 1,110 |
| | — |
| | (4,289 | ) | | — |
| | (3,179 | ) | |
| Dividends | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (515,073 | ) | | — |
| | (515,073 | ) | |
| Balance, December 31, 2015 | 441,369 |
| | 1,789,870 |
| | (2,494,901 | ) | | 3,745,815 |
| | (848,899 | ) | | 2,633,254 |
| |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 318,022 |
| | — |
| | 318,022 |
| |
| Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (94,130 | ) | | (94,130 | ) | |
| Issuance of treasury stock for stock option exercises | — |
| | (3,854 | ) | | 37,909 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 34,055 |
| |
| Issuance of treasury stock for restricted stock units vesting | — |
| | (47,516 | ) | | 29,668 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (17,848 | ) | |
| Deferred compensation | — |
| | 385 |
| | 575 |
| | (575 | ) | | — |
| | 385 |
| |
| Share-based compensation | — |
| | 53,950 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 53,950 |
| |
| Dividend equivalents for restricted stock units | — |
| | (2,003 | ) | | — |
| | 626 |
| | — |
| | (1,377 | ) | |
| Dividends | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (518,529 | ) | | — |
| | (518,529 | ) | |
| Balance, December 31, 2016 | 441,369 |
| | 1,790,832 |
| | (2,426,749 | ) | | 3,545,359 |
| | (943,029 | ) | | 2,407,782 |
| $ | 441,369 |
| | $ | 1,790,832 |
| | $ | (2,426,749 | ) | | $ | 3,545,844 |
| | $ | (943,029 | ) | | $ | 2,408,267 |
|
| Net loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,053,836 | ) | | — |
| | (1,053,836 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,054,579 | ) | | — |
| | (1,054,579 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 161,243 |
| | 161,243 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 161,243 |
| | 161,243 |
|
| Issuance of treasury stock for stock option exercises | — |
| | (286 | ) | | 2,061 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,775 |
| — |
| | (286 | ) | | 2,061 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,775 |
|
| Issuance of treasury stock for restricted stock units vesting | — |
| | (48,528 | ) | | 34,177 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (14,351 | ) | — |
| | (48,528 | ) | | 34,177 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (14,351 | ) |
| Deferred compensation | — |
| | (288 | ) | | 634 |
| | (380 | ) | | — |
| | (34 | ) | — |
| | (288 | ) | | 634 |
| | (380 | ) | | — |
| | (34 | ) |
| Share-based compensation | — |
| | 67,119 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 67,119 |
| — |
| | 67,119 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 67,119 |
|
| Dividend equivalents for restricted stock units | — |
| | (458 | ) | | — |
| | 188 |
| | — |
| | (270 | ) | — |
| | (458 | ) | | — |
| | 188 |
| | — |
| | (270 | ) |
| Dividends | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (311,973 | ) | | — |
| | (311,973 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (311,973 | ) | | — |
| | (311,973 | ) |
| Balance, December 31, 2017 | $ | 441,369 |
| | $ | 1,808,391 |
| | $ | (2,389,877 | ) | | $ | 2,179,358 |
| | $ | (781,786 | ) | | $ | 1,257,455 |
| 441,369 |
| | 1,808,391 |
| | (2,389,877 | ) | | 2,179,100 |
| | (781,786 | ) | | 1,257,197 |
|
| Cumulative effect of accounting change | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (19,149 | ) | | — |
| | (19,149 | ) |
| Net loss | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (533,299 | ) | | — |
| | (533,299 | ) |
| Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (77,440 | ) | | (77,440 | ) |
| Issuance of treasury stock for restricted stock units vesting | | — |
| | (44,547 | ) | | 35,059 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (9,488 | ) |
| Deferred compensation | | — |
| | (77 | ) | | 201 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 124 |
|
| Share-based compensation | | — |
| | 48,915 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 48,915 |
|
| Dividend equivalents for restricted stock units | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 41 |
| | — |
| | 41 |
|
| Balance, December 31, 2018 | | 441,369 |
| | 1,812,682 |
| | (2,354,617 | ) | | 1,626,693 |
| | (859,226 | ) | | 666,901 |
|
| Net loss | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (213,512 | ) | |
| | (213,512 | ) |
| Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (10,258 | ) | | (10,258 | ) |
| Issuance of treasury stock for restricted stock units vesting | | — |
| | (42,930 | ) | | 35,420 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (7,510 | ) |
| Deferred compensation | | — |
| | (151 | ) | | 276 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 125 |
|
| Share-based compensation | | — |
| | 55,968 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 55,968 |
|
| Balance, December 31, 2019 | | $ | 441,369 |
| | $ | 1,825,569 |
| | $ | (2,318,921 | ) | | $ | 1,413,181 |
| | $ | (869,484 | ) | | $ | 491,714 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
MATTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Preparation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Mattel, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries are consolidated and included in Mattel’s consolidated financial statements. Mattel does not have any minority stock ownership interests in which it has a controlling financial interest that would require consolidation. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.
On January 1, 2018, Mattel adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2017-07, Compensation - Retirement Benefits: Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. As a result, other selling and administrative expenses, operating income (loss), and other non-operating expense, net have been retrospectively restated. The impact to Mattel’s consolidated financial statements was not material. See further discussion in "Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—New Accounting Pronouncements" and "Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Employee Benefit Plans."
Revision of Consolidated Financial Statements
Mattel’s consolidated financial statements have been revised to correct for the overstatement of accrued royalties payable and understatement of retained earnings of $10.1 million as of January 1, 2015 and all subsequent periods presented. Mattel
concluded that the prior period misstatement was not material, both individually or in the aggregate, to previously issued
consolidated financial statements.
Use of Estimates
Preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could ultimately differ from those estimates.
Cash and Equivalents
Cash and equivalents include short-term investments, which are highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased. Such investments are stated at cost, which approximates market value.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Credit is granted to customers on an unsecured basis. Credit limits and payment terms are established based on extensive evaluations made on an ongoing basis throughout the fiscal year of the financial performance, cash generation, financing availability, and liquidity status of each customer. Customers are reviewed at least annually, with more frequent reviews performed as necessary, based on the customers’ financial condition and the level of credit being extended. For customers who are experiencing financial difficulties, management performs additional financial analyses before shipping to those customers on credit. Mattel uses a variety of financial arrangements to ensure collectibility of accounts receivable of customers deemed to be a credit risk, including requiring letters of credit, purchasing various forms of credit insurance with unrelated third parties, factoring, or requiring cash in advance of shipment.
Mattel records an allowance for doubtful accounts based on management’s assessment of the business environment, customers’ financial condition, historical collection experience, accounts receivable aging, and customer disputes.
Inventories
Inventories, net of allowance for obsolescence, are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Expense associated with the allowance for obsolescence is recognized in cost of sales and establishes a lower cost basis for the inventory. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out method.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 10 to 30 years for buildings, 3 to 15 years for machinery and equipment, 3 to 10 years for software, and 10 to 20 years, not to exceed the lease term, for leasehold improvements. Tools, dies, and molds are depreciated using the straight-line method over 3 years. Estimated useful lives are periodically reviewed and, where appropriate, changes are made prospectively. The carrying value of property, plant, and equipment is reviewed when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Any potential impairment identified is initially assessed by evaluating the operating performance and future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying assets. When property is sold or retired, the cost of the property and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the consolidated balance sheet,sheets, and any resulting gain or loss is included in the resultsconsolidated statements of operations.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill is allocated to various reporting units, which are at the operating segment level, for the purpose of evaluating whether goodwill is impaired. Mattel’s reporting units are: (i) North America, (ii) International, and (iii) American Girl. Components of the operating segments have been aggregated into a single reporting unit as the components have similar economic characteristics. The similar economic characteristics include the nature of the products, the nature of the production processes, the customers, and the manner in which the products are distributed. Mattel tests its goodwill for impairment annually in the third quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a reporting unit may exceed its fair value.
Mattel tests its nonamortizablehad 0 indefinite-lived intangible assets including trademarksas of and trade names, for impairment by comparing the estimated fair values of the nonamortizable intangible assets with the carrying values.years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Prior to 2018, Mattel tests nonamortizabletested indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually in the third quarter or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicateindicated that the carrying value may exceedhave exceeded its fair value.
Mattel also tests its amortizable intangible assets, which are primarily comprised of trademarks and trade names, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recovered. Amortization is computed primarily using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the amortizable intangible assets.
Foreign Currency Translation Exposure
Mattel’s reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. The translation of its net investments in subsidiaries with non-U.S. dollar functional currencies subjects Mattel to the impact of currency exchange rate fluctuations in its results of operations and financial position. Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries with non-U.S. dollar functional currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at year-end exchange rates. Income, expense,Net income (loss) and cash flow items are translated at weighted averageweighted-average exchange rates prevailing during the year. The resulting currency translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss within stockholders’ equity. Mattel’s primary currency translation exposures in 20172019 were related to its net investments in entities having functional currencies denominated in the Euro, and British pound sterling.sterling, Russian ruble, and Mexican peso.
Foreign Currency Transaction Exposure
Currency exchange rate fluctuations may impact Mattel’s results of operations and cash flows. Mattel’s currency transaction exposures include gains and losses realized on unhedged inventory purchases and unhedged receivables and payables balances that are denominated in a currency other than the applicable functional currency. Gains and losses on unhedged inventory purchases and other transactions associated with operating activities are recorded in the components of operating income (loss) in the consolidated statements of operations. Gains and losses on unhedged intercompany loans and advances are recorded as a component of other non-operating expense/income,expense, net in the consolidated statements of operations in the period in which the currency exchange rate changes. Inventory transactions denominated in the Euro, Mexican peso, British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, Australian dollar,Russian ruble, Brazilian real, and Russian rubleAustralian dollar were the primary transactions that caused foreign currency transaction exposure for Mattel in 2017.2019.
Derivative Instruments
Mattel uses foreign currency forward exchange contracts as cash flow hedges primarily to hedge its purchases and sales of inventory denominated in foreign currencies. At the inception of the contracts, Mattel designates these derivatives as cash flow hedges and documents the relationship of the hedge to the underlying transaction. Hedge effectiveness is assessed at inception and throughout the life of the hedge to ensure the hedge qualifies for hedge accounting. Changes in fair value associated with hedge ineffectiveness, if any, are recorded in the resultsconsolidated statements of operations. Changes in fair value of cash flow hedge derivatives are deferred and recorded as part of accumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders’ equity until the underlying transaction affects earnings. In the event that an anticipated transaction is no longer likely to occur, Mattel recognizes the change in fair value of the derivative in its resultsconsolidated statements of operations in the period the determination is made.
Additionally, Mattel uses foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge intercompany loans and advances denominated in foreign currencies. Due to the short-term nature of the contracts involved, Mattel does not use hedge accounting for these contracts, and as such, changes in fair value are recorded in the period of change in the consolidated statements of operations.
Revenue Recognition and Sales Adjustments
Revenue is recognized when control of the goods is transferred to the customer, which is either upon shipment or upon receipt of productsfinished goods by the customer, depending on the terms, provided that: there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance; persuasive evidence of an agreement exists documenting the specific terms of the transaction; the sales price is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is reasonably assured. Management assesses the business environment, the customer’s financial condition, historical collection experience, accounts receivable aging, and customer disputes to determine whether collectibility is reasonably assured. If collectibility is not considered reasonably assured at the time of sale, Mattel does not recognize revenue until collection occurs. Value added taxes are recorded on a net basis and are excluded from revenue.contract terms. Mattel routinely enters into arrangements with its customers to provide sales incentives, support customer promotions, and provide allowances for returns andor defective merchandise. Such programs are based primarily on customer purchases, customer performance of specified promotional activities, and other specified factors such as sales to consumers. The costs ofAccruals for these programs are recorded as sales adjustments that reduce gross sales in the period the related sale is recognized.
The accrual for such programs, which can either be contractual or discretionary in nature, is based on an assessment of customer purchases, customer performance of specified promotional activities, and other specified factors such as customer sales volume. In making these estimates, management considers all available information, including the overall business environment, historical trends, and information from customers.
Mattel also enters into symbolic and functional licensing arrangements, whereby the licensee pays Mattel royalties based on sales of licensed product, and in certain cases are subject to minimum guaranteed amounts. The timing of revenue recognition for certain of these licensing arrangements with minimum guarantees changed under the new revenue recognition standards, which under the new revenue recognition standards is based on the determination of whether the license of intellectual property ("IP") is symbolic, which includes the license of Mattel's brands, or functional, which includes the license of Mattel's completed television or streaming content.
Revenues from symbolic licenses of IP are recognized based on actual sales when Mattel expects royalties to exceed the minimum guarantee. For symbolic licensing arrangements in which Mattel does not expect royalties to exceed the minimum guarantee, an estimate of the royalties expected to be recouped is recognized on a straight-line basis over the license term.
Revenues from functional licenses of IP are recognized once the license period has commenced and the licensee has the ability to use the delivered content.
Mattel applied the practical expedient prescribed in the new revenue recognition standards and did not evaluate contracts of one year or less for the existence of a significant financing component. Multi-year contracts were not material.
Advertising and Promotion Costs
Costs of media advertising, including direct-response advertising, are capitalized and expensed the first time the advertising takes place, except for direct-response advertising, which is capitalized and amortized over its expected period of future benefits. Direct-response advertising consists primarily of catalog production and mailing costs, which are generally amortized within three months from the date the catalogs are mailed.place.
Product Recalls and Withdrawals
Mattel establishes a reserve for product recalls and withdrawals on a product-specific basis when circumstances giving rise to the recall or withdrawal become known. Facts and circumstances related to the recall or withdrawal, including where the product affected by the recall or withdrawal is located (e.g., with consumers, in customers’ inventory, or in Mattel’s inventory), cost estimates for shipping and handling for returns, cost estimates for communicating the recall or withdrawal to consumers and customers, and cost estimates for parts and labor if the recalled or withdrawn product is deemed to be repairable, are considered when establishing a product recall or withdrawal reserve. These factors are updated and reevaluated each period, and the related reserves are adjusted when these factors indicate that the recall or withdrawal reserve is either not sufficient to cover or exceeds the estimated product recall or withdrawal expenses.
Design and Development Costs
Product design and development costs primarily include employee compensation and outside services and are charged to the results of operations as incurred.
Employee Benefit Plans
Mattel and certain of its subsidiaries have retirement and other postretirement benefit plans covering substantially all employees of these companies.entities. Actuarial valuations are used in determining amounts recognized in the financial statements for certain retirement and other postretirement benefit plans (see "Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Employee Benefit Plans").
Share-Based Payments
Mattel recognizes the cost of service-based employee share-based payment awards on a straight-line attribution basis over the requisite employee service period, net of estimated forfeitures.
Determining the fair value of share-based awards at the measurement date requires judgment, including estimating the expected term that stock options will be outstanding prior to exercise, the associated volatility, and the expected dividends. With the exception of certain market-based options granted in 2018, which are valued using a Monte Carlo valuation methodology, Mattel estimates the fair value of options granted using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The expected life of the options used in this calculation is the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding and has been determined based on historical exercise experience. Expected stock price volatility is based on the historical volatility of Mattel’s stock for a period approximating the expected life, the expected dividend yield is based on Mattel’s most recent actual annual dividend payout, and the risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues approximating the expected life. Judgment is also required in estimating the amount of share-based awards that will be forfeited prior to vesting.
Mattel determines the fair value of RSUs, excluding performance RSUs, based on the closing market price of Mattel’s common stock on the date of grant, adjusted by the present value of the expected dividenddividends for RSUs that are not entitled to a dividend during the vest period.
In 2016, Mattel early adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies several aspectsdetermines the fair value of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions for public entities. The new standard requires companies to recognize all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies inperformance-related components of its performance RSUs based on the income statement whenclosing market price of Mattel's common stock on the awards vest or are settled. Upon adoption indate of grant. It determines the fourth quarterfair value of 2016, Mattel recognized $4.3 million in discrete tax benefits related to share-based payment accounting. Mattel also elected to apply the change in presentationmarket-related components of excess tax benefits in the statements of cash flowsits performance RSUs based on a prospective basis, and as a result, prior periods were not retroactively adjusted. Excess tax benefits (deficits) in 2016 and 2017 are classified as an operating activity in the statements of cash flows.
In 2015, the tax effect of deductions in excess of compensation cost ("windfalls") related to the exercise of nonqualified stock options and vesting of other share-based compensation awards were recorded in equity and tax deficiencies ("shortfalls") were recorded in equity to the extent of previously recognized windfalls.Monte Carlo valuation methodology.
Income Taxes
Certain income and expense items are accounted for differently for financial reporting and income tax purposes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities, applying enacted statutory income tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Mattel evaluates the realization of our deferred tax assets based on all available evidence and establishes a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that they will not be realized.
Mattel recognizes the financial statement effects of a tax position when it is more likely than not that, based on technical merits, the position will be sustained upon examination. The tax benefits of the position recognized in the financial statements are then measured based on the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon settlement with a taxing authority. In addition, we recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of the income tax provision.
In the normal course of business, Mattel is regularly audited by federal, state, local, and foreign tax authorities. The ultimate settlement of any particular issue with the applicable taxing authority could have a material impact on Mattel’s consolidated financial statements.
Venezuelan Operations
Since January 1, 2010, Mattel has accounted for Venezuela as a highly inflationary economy as the three-year cumulative inflation rate for Venezuela exceeded 100%. Accordingly, Mattel’s Venezuelan subsidiary used the U.S. dollar as its functional currency, and monetary assets and liabilities denominated in Venezuelan bolívar fuerte ("BsF") generategenerated income or expense for changes in value associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations against the U.S. dollar. From January 2010 through January 2013, Mattel’s Venezuelan subsidiary used the Sistema de Transacciones con Títulos en Moneda Extranjera ("SITME") rate, which was quoted at 5.30 BsF per U.S. dollar as of December 31, 2012, to remeasure monetary assets and liabilities denominated in BsF. During February 2013, the Central Bank of Venezuela revised its official exchange rate to 6.30 BsF per U.S. dollar and eliminated the SITME rate.
During March 2013, the Venezuelan government introduced a complementary currency exchange system, the Sistema Complementario de Administración de Divisas 1 ("SICAD 1"). SICAD 1 was intended to function as an auction system, allowing entities in specific sectors to bid for U.S. dollars to be used for specified import transactions. During February 2014, the Venezuelan government introduced an additional currency exchange system, the Sistema Complementario de Administración de Divisas 2 ("SICAD 2"), which was expected to provide a greater supply of U.S. dollars from sources other than the Venezuelan government and increase participation to all sectors and companies.
During February 2015, the Venezuelan government announced the launch of a new three-tiered currency exchange platform, which included a new exchange system called the Marginal Currency System ("SIMADI"). The first tier was used for food, medicine, agriculture, and other essential goods and used an official exchange rate of 6.30 BsF per U.S. dollar. The second tier was a merger of the SICAD 1 and SICAD 2 systems, which held periodic auctions for entities in specific sectors. The third tier was the new SIMADI system, which was intended to be a market-driven exchange that allowed for legal trading of foreign currency based on supply and demand.
During March 2016, the Venezuelan government further revised its currency exchange platform to a dual system. The SICAD rate merged with the official exchange rate, becoming the new Tipo de Cambio Protegido ("DIPRO") exchange rate, which was fixed at 10.00 BsF per U.S. dollar. The existing SIMADI rate was renamed the Tipo de Cambio Complementario ("DICOM") exchange rate. The DIPRO rate is used for essential imports, such as food and medicine, whereas the DICOM rate is used for all other transactions. During the first quarter of 2016, Mattel changed its remeasurement rate from the official exchange rate to the new DICOM exchange rate. The change in the remeasurement rate resulted in an unrealized foreign currency exchange loss of approximately $26 million, which was recognized in other non-operating expense/income, net in the consolidated statements of operations in the first quarter of 2016.
During May 2017, the Venezuelan government initiated an auction mechanism within the DICOM exchange rate system, which was not accessed by Mattel. During December 2017, Mattel initiated actions to discontinue operations in Venezuela and concluded that its Venezuelan subsidiary had been substantially liquidated. In connection with the substantial liquidation, Mattel recognized a $59.0 million loss in other non-operating income/expense, net in the consolidated statements of operations related to the associated cumulative translation adjustments.
United KingdomArgentina Operations
During June 2016,Effective July 1, 2018, Mattel accounted for Argentina as a highly inflationary economy, as the referendum by British voters to exit the European Union ("Brexit") adversely impacted global markets and resulted in a sharp decline of the British pound sterling againstprojected three-year cumulative inflation rate exceeded 100%. As such, beginning July 1, 2018, Mattel's Argentina subsidiary has designated the U.S. dollar. In February 2017, the British Parliament voted in favor of allowing the British government to begin the formal process of Brexit and discussions with the European Union began in March 2017. In the short-term, volatility in the British pound sterling could continuedollar as the United Kingdom negotiates its anticipated exit from the European Union. In the longer term, any impact from Brexit on Mattel's United Kingdom operations will depend, in part, on the outcome of tariff, trade, regulatory, and other negotiations. Mattel's United Kingdom operationsfunctional currency. Mattel’s Argentina subsidiary represented approximately 4%less than 1% of Mattel's consolidated net sales for the yearyears ended December 31, 2017.2019 and 2018.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014,February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), as amended. Mattel adopted the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new guidance establishes a five-step model to achieve that core principle and also requires additional disclosures about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts. ASU 2014-09 was originally effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers – Deferral of the Effective Date, which defers the effective date to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application is permitted after December 15, 2016. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), which clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations, and ASU 2016-10, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, which clarifies the identification of performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers - Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, which clarifies guidance on assessing collectibility, presenting sales taxes and other similar taxes collected from customers, measuring noncash consideration, and certain transition matters. ASU 2014-09, ASU 2015-14, ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, and ASU 2016-12 (collectively, the "new revenue standards") will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginninglease standard on January 1, 2018. During2019 using the fourth quarter of 2017, Mattel substantially completed its assessment ofmodified retrospective transition method. Prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted and continue to be reported under the impact of the new revenueaccounting standards on its revenue recognition accounting policy and its consolidated financial statements. Upon adoption of the new revenue standards on January 1, 2018, Mattel will recognize a cumulativein effect reductionfor those periods, as further discussed in "Note 7 to the opening balance of its retained earnings of approximately $29 million associated with certain licensing contracts. Prior periods will not be retrospectively adjusted.Consolidated Financial Statements—Leases."
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which requires a lessee to recognize a lease asset and lease liability on its balance sheet for all leases with a term greater than 12 months. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on January 1, 2019. Mattel is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on its operating results and financial position, which based on a preliminary assessment, is expected to have a material impact on its financial position.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which adds and clarifies guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows, including proceeds from insurance claim settlements, proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance, and distributions received from equity method investees. ASU 2016-15 will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on January 1, 2018. Mattel does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-15 to have a material effect on its operating results or financial position.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on January 1, 2018. Mattel does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-16 to have a material effect on its operating results or financial position.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses and refines the definition of the term output. ASU 2017-01 will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on January 1, 2018. Mattel does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-01 to have a material effect on its operating results or financial position.
In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets, which clarifies the scope on recently established guidance on nonfinancial asset derecognition as well as the accounting for partial sales of nonfinancial assets. ASU 2017-05 will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on January 1, 2018. Mattel does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-05 to have a material effect on its operating results or financial position.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Compensation - Retirement Benefits: Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which requires entities that sponsor defined benefit plans to (i) present service cost within operations, if such a subtotal is presented, (ii) other components of net benefit costs should be presented separately outside of income from operations, if such a subtotal is presented, and (iii) only the service cost component should be capitalized, when applicable. If a separate line item is not used, the line item in the income statement where the other components of net benefit costs are included must be disclosed. Further, gains and losses from curtailments and settlements, and the cost of certain termination benefits should be reported in the same manner as other components of net benefit cost. ASU 2017-07 will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on January 1, 2018. Mattel does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-07 to have a material effect on its operating results or financial position.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation: Scope of Modification Accounting, which clarifies when to account for a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award as a modification. ASU 2017-09 will be effective prospectively for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on January 1, 2018. Mattel does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-09 to have a material effect on its operating results or financial position.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, which expands the hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting and changes both how companies assess hedge effectiveness and presentation and disclosure requirements. Mattel adopted ASU 2017-12 on January 1, 2019 and the adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income: Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which permits the reclassification of disproportionate tax effects in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) caused by the U.S. Tax Act to retained earnings. Mattel adopted ASU 2018-02 on January 1, 2019 and the adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. For additional information, see "Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Income Taxes."
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), which changes the methodology for measuring credit losses on financial instruments and the timing of when such losses are recorded. This update replaces the existing incurred loss impairment model with an expected loss model (referred to as the Current Expected Credit Loss model, or "CECL"). In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-19, Codifications Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses" which clarifies that receivables arising from operating leases are accounted for using lease guidance and not as financial instruments. ASU 2016-13 and its related amendments (ASU 2018-19, ASU 2019-04, ASU 2019-05, ASU 2019-10, and ASU 2019-11) will bebecome effective for the fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2020. During the fourth quarter of 2019, Mattel substantially completed its assessment of the impact of ASU 2016-13 and its related amendments on its consolidated financial statements and does not believe it will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements, including the consideration of costs and benefits. ASU 2018-13 will become effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on January 1, 2019.2020. The amendments on changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements, and the narrative description of measurement uncertainty will be applied prospectively for only the most recent interim or annual period presented in the initial fiscal year of adoption. All other amendments will be applied retrospectively to all periods presented upon their effective date. Early applicationadoption is permitted. In addition, early adoption of any removed or modified disclosures, but delayed adoption of any additional disclosures until their effective date, is permitted. Mattel will adopt ASU 2018-13 on January 1, 2020 and does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans, which modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. ASU 2018-14 will become effective for the fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2021. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period after issuance ofand the update.amendments will be applied on a retrospective basis to all periods presented. Mattel is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2017-122018-14 on its operating resultsconsolidated financial statements.
In March 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-02, Entertainment - Films - Other Assets - Film Costs (Subtopic 926-20): Improvements to Accounting for Costs of Films and License Agreements for Program Materials, which aligns the accounting for production costs of episodic television series with the accounting of films by removing the content distinction for capitalization. ASU 2019-02 will become effective for the fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2020. Mattel will adopt ASU 2019-02 on January 1, 2020 and does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position.statements.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, which simplifies the accounting for incomes taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740. The amendments also improve consistent application of and simplify the accounting for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance. ASU 2019-12 will become effective for the fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2021. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments related to changes in ownership of foreign equity method investments or foreign subsidiaries will be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2007. The amendments related to franchise taxes that are partially based on income will be applied on either a retrospective basis for all periods presented or a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2007. All other amendments will be applied on a prospective basis. Mattel is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2019-12 on its consolidated financial statements.
Note 2—Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment, net includes the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Land | $ | 25,112 |
| | $ | 25,023 |
|
| Buildings | 302,956 |
| | 294,227 |
|
| Machinery and equipment | 812,509 |
| | 875,308 |
|
| Software | 364,391 |
| | 400,488 |
|
| Tools, dies, and molds | 747,706 |
| | 831,743 |
|
| Capital leases | — |
| | 23,927 |
|
| Leasehold improvements | 183,250 |
| | 240,636 |
|
| | 2,435,924 |
| | 2,691,352 |
|
| Less: accumulated depreciation | (1,885,785 | ) | | (2,033,757 | ) |
| | $ | 550,139 |
| | $ | 657,595 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Land | $ | 25,114 |
| | $ | 25,113 |
|
| Buildings | 303,495 |
| | 280,226 |
|
| Machinery and equipment | 902,861 |
| | 828,969 |
|
| Software | 384,568 |
| | 356,622 |
|
| Tools, dies, and molds | 887,442 |
| | 869,385 |
|
| Capital leases | 24,279 |
| | 23,970 |
|
| Leasehold improvements | 213,238 |
| | 261,254 |
|
| | $ | 2,740,997 |
| | $ | 2,645,539 |
|
| Less: accumulated depreciation | (1,955,712 | ) | | (1,871,574 | ) |
| | $ | 785,285 |
| | $ | 773,965 |
|
During 2017,the year ended December 31, 2019, Mattel recorded an assetimpaired certain property, plant, and equipment totaling $38.7 million. Of the total impairment chargecharges, $25.9 million related to the impairment of $21.2 millioncertain American Girl retail store assets, which was recorded within other selling and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations in the American Girl segment to reduce the carrying value of certain American Girlretail store leasehold improvementsimprovements. The remaining carrying value of impaired American Girl retail store assets is not material. The other impairment charges of $12.8 million were primarily related to their estimated fair value, which was determined based on discounted expected future cash flows. Additionally, Mattel recorded an assetthe full impairment charge of $20.6 million within cost of sales in the consolidated statements of operations for capitalized costs related tocertain tools, dies, and molds and machinery and equipment due to discontinued use. Refer to "Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statement—Fair Value Measurements" for additional information.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2019, in conjunction with the Capital Light program, Mattel discontinued productsproduction at one of its plants based in Mexico and has committed to a plan to dispose of the land and building, which meet the held for sale criteria and is actively being marketed for sale. The estimated fair value of the land and building, less costs to dispose, were no longer considereddetermined to be recoverable.exceed its net book value of $12.1 million and are included within property, plant and equipment, net in the consolidated balance sheets within the Corporate and Other segment in "Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Segment Information".
Note 3—Goodwill and Other Intangibles
Goodwill is allocated to various reporting units, which are at the operating segment level, for the purpose of evaluating whether goodwill is impaired. Mattel’s reporting units are: (i) North America, (ii) International, and (iii) American Girl. Components of the operating segments have been aggregated into a single reporting unit as the components have similar economic characteristics. The similar economic characteristics include the nature of the products, the nature of the production processes, the customers, and the manner in which the products are distributed.
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill by operating segment for 20172019 and 20162018 is shown below. Brand-specific goodwill held by foreign subsidiaries is allocated to the North America and American Girl operating segments selling those brands, thereby causing a foreign currency translation impact for these operating segments. Due to the sale of Corolle in the first quarter of 2018, there was no foreign currency translation impact for the American Girl operating segment during the year ended December 31, 2019.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | North America | | International | | American Girl | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| Balance at December 31, 2017 | $ | 733,034 |
| | $ | 452,152 |
| | $ | 211,483 |
| | $ | 1,396,669 |
|
| Dispositions | — |
| | — |
| | (4,018 | ) | | (4,018 | ) |
| Currency exchange rate impact | (1,800 | ) | | (4,533 | ) | | 106 |
| | (6,227 | ) |
| Balance at December 31, 2018 | 731,234 |
| | 447,619 |
| | 207,571 |
| | 1,386,424 |
|
| Currency exchange rate impact | 1,196 |
| | 3,094 |
| | — |
| | 4,290 |
|
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | $ | 732,430 |
| | $ | 450,713 |
| | $ | 207,571 |
| | $ | 1,390,714 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | North America | | International | | American Girl | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| Balance at December 31, 2015 | $ | 718,999 |
| | $ | 452,879 |
| | $ | 212,642 |
| | $ | 1,384,520 |
|
| Acquisition | 15,078 |
| | 8,572 |
| | — |
| | 23,650 |
|
| Currency exchange rate impact | (3,938 | ) | | (16,443 | ) | | (161 | ) | | (20,542 | ) |
| Balance at December 31, 2016 | 730,139 |
| | 445,008 |
| | 212,481 |
| | 1,387,628 |
|
| Currency exchange rate impact | 2,895 |
| | 7,144 |
| | (998 | ) | | 9,041 |
|
| Balance at December 31, 2017 | $ | 733,034 |
| | $ | 452,152 |
| | $ | 211,483 |
| | $ | 1,396,669 |
|
In the third quarter of 2017,2019, Mattel performed its annual impairment tests and determined that goodwill was not impaired. In the fourth quarter of 2017, Mattel concluded that a triggering event had occurred based on its fourth quarter results and updated outlook. Mattel performed an interim impairment test of goodwill on each reporting unit and determined that goodwill was not impaired since each reporting unit's fair value exceeded its carrying value.
Acquisitions of Sproutling, Inc. and Fuhu Assets
In January 2016, Mattel completed its acquisition of Sproutling, Inc. ("Sproutling"), a maker of smart technology products for parents and families, for total consideration of $9.9 million and additional contingent consideration that may become payable under the terms of the agreement based on Sproutling's operating results over the next three years. Also in January 2016, Mattel acquired substantially all of the assets of Fuhu, Inc. ("Fuhu"), a developer of high technology products for children and families and best known for its nabi brand of products, for total consideration of $23.3 million. These acquisitions are expected to strengthen Mattel's digital and smart technology capabilities and create opportunities to bring new technology-enabled products to market.
Mattel finalized the valuation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the fourth quarter of 2016, which resulted in adjustments to the purchase price allocation during the measurement period. During 2016, Mattel recognized approximately $2 million of integration and acquisition costs. There were no integration and acquisition costs during 2017. Integration and acquisition costs are recorded within other selling and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The pro forma and actual results of operations for these acquisitions have not been presented because they are not material, individually or in the aggregate, to Mattel.
Other Intangibles
Identifiable intangibles include the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Nonamortizable identifiable intangibles | $ | — |
| | $ | 458,589 |
|
| Identifiable intangibles (net of amortization of $168.8 and $153.7 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively) | 639,203 |
| | 201,859 |
|
| | $ | 639,203 |
| | $ | 660,448 |
|
were $553.1 million, net of accumulated amortization of $248.0 million, and $587.5 million, net of accumulated amortization of $207.9 million, as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The estimated future amortization expense for the next five years is as follows:
|
| | | |
| | Amortization Expense |
| | (In thousands) |
| 2020 | $ | 39,090 |
|
| 2021 | 38,160 |
|
| 2022 | 38,311 |
|
| 2023 | 37,622 |
|
| 2024 | 36,942 |
|
|
| | |
| | Amortization Expense |
| | (In thousands) |
| 2018 | 39,300 |
|
| 2019 | 40,002 |
|
| 2020 | 40,800 |
|
| 2021 | 38,959 |
|
| 2022 | 39,178 |
|
In connection with the acquisitions of Sproutling and Fuhu assets during 2016, Mattel recognized $11.0 million of amortizable identifiablehad 0 indefinite-lived intangible assets primarily related to patents.
Mattel tests nonamortizable intangible assets, including trademarksas of and trade names, for impairment annually in the third quarteryear ended of December 31, 2019 and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values may exceed the fair values. During the third quarter of 2017, Mattel discontinued the use of a trademark which resulted in an asset impairment charge of $9.2 million. The asset impairment charge is recorded within other selling and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. Mattel performed its annual impairment assessment during the third quarter of 2017 and determined that its nonamortizable intangible asset was not impaired.
In the fourth quarter of 2017, Mattel concluded that a triggering event had occurred related to its nonamortizable intangible asset, and performed an impairment analysis. Based on the results of the interim impairment analysis, it was determined that the nonamortizable intangible asset was not impaired, but that the intangible asset was no longer nonamortizable, and should be amortized starting in the fourth quarter of 2017.2018.
Mattel also tests its amortizable intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. Mattel determined that itsMattel's amortizable intangible assets primarily consist of trademarks. During 2019, Mattel's amortizable intangible assets were not impaired during 2017.impaired. During 2018, Mattel discontinued the use of certain brands and products, which resulted in asset impairments of $4.3 million.
Note 4—Employee Benefit Plans
Mattel and certain of its subsidiaries have qualified and nonqualified retirement plans covering substantially all employees of these companies. These plans include defined benefit pension plans, defined contribution retirement plans, postretirement benefit plans, and deferred compensation and excess benefit plans. In addition, Mattel makes contributions to government-mandated retirement plans in countries outside the U.S. where its employees work.
A summary of retirement plan expense, net is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Defined benefit pension plans | $ | 9,815 |
| | $ | 12,366 |
| | $ | 7,428 |
|
| Defined contribution retirement plans | 32,743 |
| | 35,318 |
| | 38,508 |
|
| Postretirement benefit plans | (2,220 | ) | | (2,148 | ) | | 963 |
|
| Deferred compensation and excess benefit plans | 10,994 |
| | (2,599 | ) | | 10,015 |
|
| | $ | 51,332 |
| | $ | 42,937 |
| | $ | 56,914 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Defined benefit pension plans | $ | 7,428 |
| | $ | 13,999 |
| | $ | 14,779 |
|
| Defined contribution retirement plans | 38,508 |
| | 37,661 |
| | 40,673 |
|
| Postretirement benefit plans | 963 |
| | 1,343 |
| | 1,396 |
|
| Deferred compensation and excess benefit plans | 10,015 |
| | 5,093 |
| | 225 |
|
| | $ | 56,914 |
| | $ | 58,096 |
| | $ | 57,073 |
|
Defined Benefit Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans
Mattel provides defined benefit pension plans for eligible domestic employees, which are intended to comply with the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"). Some of Mattel’s foreign subsidiaries have defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all of their eligible employees. Mattel funds these plans in accordance with the terms of the plans and local statutory requirements, which differ for each of the countries in which the subsidiaries are located. Mattel also has unfunded postretirement health insurance plans covering certain eligible domestic employees.
A summary of the components of Mattel’s net periodic benefit cost (credit) and other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income for the years ended December 31 is as follows:
| | | | Defined Benefit Pension Plans | | Postretirement Benefit Plans | Defined Benefit Pension Plans | | Postretirement Benefit Plans |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | (In thousands) | (In thousands) |
| Net periodic benefit cost: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net periodic benefit cost (credit): | | | | | | | | | | |
| Service cost | $ | 4,045 |
| | $ | 5,557 |
| | $ | 6,105 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 52 |
| | $ | 54 |
| $ | 4,479 |
| | $ | 4,223 |
| | $ | 4,045 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 2 |
|
| Interest cost | 17,961 |
| | 24,526 |
| | 26,007 |
| | 812 |
| | 1,143 |
| | 1,194 |
| 19,309 |
| | 18,117 |
| | 17,961 |
| | 201 |
| | 208 |
| | 812 |
|
| Expected return on plan assets | (23,072 | ) | | (25,726 | ) | | (29,850 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| (21,714 | ) | | (22,508 | ) | | (23,072 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Amortization of prior service cost (credit) | 29 |
| | 461 |
| | (465 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 64 |
| | 29 |
| | 29 |
| | (2,038 | ) | | (2,037 | ) | | — |
|
| Recognized actuarial loss | 8,362 |
| | 6,994 |
| | 15,168 |
| | 149 |
| | 148 |
| | 148 |
| |
| Recognized actuarial loss (gain) | | 7,585 |
| | 8,518 |
| | 8,362 |
| | (384 | ) | | (320 | ) | | 149 |
|
| Settlement loss | — |
| | 1,772 |
| | 6,453 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | 3,248 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Curtailment loss (gain) | 103 |
| | 415 |
| | (8,639 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 7,428 |
| | $ | 13,999 |
| | $ | 14,779 |
| | $ | 963 |
| | $ | 1,343 |
| | $ | 1,396 |
| |
| Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Curtailment loss | | 92 |
| | 739 |
| | 103 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Net periodic benefit cost (credit) | | $ | 9,815 |
| | $ | 12,366 |
| | $ | 7,428 |
| | $ | (2,220 | ) | | $ | (2,148 | ) | | $ | 963 |
|
| Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net actuarial loss (gain) | $ | 46 |
| | $ | (1,531 | ) | | $ | (8,813 | ) | | $ | (2,746 | ) | | $ | (1,833 | ) | | $ | (3,130 | ) | $ | 28,740 |
| | $ | (4,433 | ) | | $ | 46 |
| | $ | 1,870 |
| | $ | (276 | ) | | $ | (2,746 | ) |
| Prior service cost (credit) | — |
| | 505 |
| | 8,691 |
| | (16,261 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| 26 |
| | 114 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (16,261 | ) |
| Amortization of prior service (cost) credit | (29 | ) | | (461 | ) | | 465 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| (64 | ) | | (29 | ) | | (29 | ) | | 2,038 |
| | 2,037 |
| | — |
|
| Total recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) (a) | $ | 17 |
| | $ | (1,487 | ) | | $ | 343 |
| | $ | (19,007 | ) | | $ | (1,833 | ) | | $ | (3,130 | ) | |
| Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 7,445 |
| | $ | 12,512 |
| | $ | 15,122 |
| | $ | (18,044 | ) | | $ | (490 | ) | | $ | (1,734 | ) | |
| Total recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income (a) | | $ | 28,702 |
| | $ | (4,348 | ) | | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 3,908 |
| | $ | 1,761 |
| | $ | (19,007 | ) |
| Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost (credit) and other comprehensive (loss) income | | $ | 38,517 |
| | $ | 8,018 |
| | $ | 7,445 |
| | $ | 1,688 |
| | $ | (387 | ) | | $ | (18,044 | ) |
| |
| (a) | Amounts exclude related tax expense of $5.5 million, $2.1 million, and $4.5 million, $1.2 million,during 2019, 2018, and $1.1 million, during 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, which are also included in other comprehensive (loss) income. |
Net periodic benefit cost (credit) for Mattel’s domestic defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans was calculated on January 1 of each year using the following assumptions:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| Defined benefit pension plans: | | | | | |
| Discount rate | 4.1 | % | | 3.4 | % | | 3.9 | % |
| Weighted-average rate of future compensation increases | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
| Long-term rate of return on plan assets | 6.0 | % | | 6.0 | % | | 6.3 | % |
| Postretirement benefit plans: | | | | | |
| Discount rate | 4.1 | % | | 3.4 | % | | 3.9 | % |
| Annual increase in Medicare Part B premium | 6.0 | % | | 6.0 | % | | 6.0 | % |
| Health care cost trend rate: | | | | | |
| Pre-65 | 7.0 | % | | 7.3 | % | | 7.0 | % |
| Post-65 | 6.8 | % | | 7.3 | % | | 7.8 | % |
| Ultimate cost trend rate: | | | | | |
| Pre-65 | 4.5 | % | | 4.5 | % | | 4.5 | % |
| Post-65 | 4.5 | % | | 4.5 | % | | 4.5 | % |
| Year that the rate reaches the ultimate cost trend rate: | | | | | |
| Pre-65 | 2025 |
| | 2025 |
| | 2024 |
|
| Post-65 | 2025 |
| | 2025 |
| | 2024 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 |
| Defined benefit pension plans: | | | | | |
| Discount rate | 3.9 | % | | 4.2 | % | | 3.8 | % |
| Weighted average rate of future compensation increases | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | 3.8 | % |
| Long-term rate of return on plan assets | 6.3 | % | | 6.5 | % | | (a) |
|
| Postretirement benefit plans: | | | | | |
| Discount rate | 3.9 | % | | 4.2 | % | | 3.8 | % |
| Annual increase in Medicare Part B premium | 6.0 | % | | 6.0 | % | | 6.0 | % |
| Health care cost trend rate: | | | | | |
| Pre-65 | 7.0 | % | | 7.0 | % | | 7.5 | % |
| Post-65 | 7.8 | % | | 8.3 | % | | 8.8 | % |
| Ultimate cost trend rate: | | | | | |
| Pre-65 | 4.5 | % | | 4.5 | % | | 4.5 | % |
| Post-65 | 4.5 | % | | 4.5 | % | | 4.5 | % |
| Year that the rate reaches the ultimate cost trend rate: | | | | | |
| Pre-65 | 2024 |
| | 2023 |
| | 2023 |
|
| Post-65 | 2024 |
| | 2024 |
| | 2024 |
|
| |
(a) | A long-term rate of return on plan assets of 7.5% was used for the first half of 2015. A long-term rate of return on plan assets of 6.8% was used for the second half of 2015, resulting from a change in the plans' target asset allocation. |
Discount rates, weighted averageweighted-average rates of future compensation increases, and long-term rates of return on plan assets for Mattel’s foreign defined benefit pension plans differ from the assumptions used for Mattel’s domestic defined benefit pension plans due to differences in local economic conditions in the locations where the non-U.S. plans are based. The rates shown in the preceding table are indicative of the weighted averageweighted-average rates of all of Mattel’s defined benefit pension plans given the relative insignificance of the foreign plans to the consolidated total.
The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service cost for the domestic defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost in 20182020 is $8.5 million. The estimated net actuarial gain and prior service credit for the domestic postretirement benefit plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit costcredit in 20182020 is $2.0$2.1 million.
Mattel used a measurement date of December 31, 20172019 for its defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans. A summary of the changes in benefit obligation and plan assets is as follows:
| | | | Defined Benefit Pension Plans | | Postretirement Benefit Plans | Defined Benefit Pension Plans | | Postretirement Benefit Plans |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 |
| | (In thousands) | (In thousands) |
| Change in Benefit Obligation: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Benefit obligation, beginning of year | $ | 605,851 |
| | $ | 611,490 |
| | $ | 27,614 |
| | $ | 30,416 |
| $ | 567,502 |
| | $ | 639,319 |
| | $ | 6,201 |
| | $ | 7,752 |
|
| Service cost | 4,045 |
| | 5,557 |
| | 2 |
| | 52 |
| 4,479 |
| | 4,223 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
|
| Interest cost | 17,961 |
| | 24,526 |
| | 812 |
| | 1,143 |
| 19,309 |
| | 18,117 |
| | 201 |
| | 208 |
|
| Impact of currency exchange rate changes | 12,932 |
| | (14,535 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| 1,500 |
| | (7,793 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Actuarial loss (gain) | 32,817 |
| | 25,164 |
| | (2,597 | ) | | (1,686 | ) | 72,353 |
| | (34,214 | ) | | 1,486 |
| | (596 | ) |
| Benefits paid | (34,314 | ) | | (46,425 | ) | | (1,818 | ) | | (2,311 | ) | (36,991 | ) | | (50,211 | ) | | (2,108 | ) | | (1,164 | ) |
| Plan amendments | 27 |
| | 74 |
| | (16,261 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | 809 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Settlements | | — |
| | (2,748 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Benefit obligation, end of year | $ | 639,319 |
| | $ | 605,851 |
| | $ | 7,752 |
| | $ | 27,614 |
| $ | 628,152 |
| | $ | 567,502 |
| | $ | 5,781 |
| | $ | 6,201 |
|
| Change in Plan Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Plan assets at fair value, beginning of year | $ | 433,780 |
| | $ | 435,274 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 401,929 |
| | $ | 460,952 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Actual return on plan assets | 47,727 |
| | 43,292 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 60,721 |
| | (18,162 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Employer contributions | 4,807 |
| | 17,617 |
| | 1,818 |
| | 2,311 |
| 3,670 |
| | 18,216 |
| | 2,108 |
| | 1,164 |
|
| Impact of currency exchange rate changes | 8,952 |
| | (15,978 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| 2,418 |
| | (5,554 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Benefits paid | (34,314 | ) | | (46,425 | ) | | (1,818 | ) | | (2,311 | ) | (36,991 | ) | | (50,211 | ) | | (2,108 | ) | | (1,164 | ) |
| Settlements | | — |
| | (3,312 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Plan assets at fair value, end of year | $ | 460,952 |
| | $ | 433,780 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 431,747 |
| | $ | 401,929 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Net Amount Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Funded status, end of year | $ | (178,367 | ) | | $ | (172,071 | ) | | $ | (7,752 | ) | | $ | (27,614 | ) | $ | (196,405 | ) | | $ | (165,573 | ) | | $ | (5,781 | ) | | $ | (6,201 | ) |
| Current accrued benefit liability | (16,180 | ) | | (4,519 | ) | | (1,400 | ) | | (2,700 | ) | $ | (4,593 | ) | | $ | (4,395 | ) | | $ | (750 | ) | | $ | (1,090 | ) |
| Noncurrent accrued benefit liability | (162,187 | ) | | (167,552 | ) | | (6,352 | ) | | (24,914 | ) | (191,812 | ) | | (161,178 | ) | | (5,031 | ) | | (5,111 | ) |
| Net amount recognized | $ | (178,367 | ) | | $ | (172,071 | ) | | $ | (7,752 | ) | | $ | (27,614 | ) | $ | (196,405 | ) | | $ | (165,573 | ) | | $ | (5,781 | ) | | $ | (6,201 | ) |
| Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (a): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net actuarial loss (gain) | $ | 243,295 |
| | $ | 243,249 |
| | $ | (2,795 | ) | | $ | (49 | ) | $ | 266,714 |
| | $ | 238,862 |
| | $ | (1,201 | ) | | $ | (3,071 | ) |
| Prior service cost (credit) | 135 |
| | 164 |
| | (16,261 | ) | | — |
| 182 |
| | 220 |
| | (12,186 | ) | | (14,224 | ) |
| | $ | 243,430 |
| | $ | 243,413 |
| | $ | (19,056 | ) | | $ | (49 | ) | $ | 266,896 |
| | $ | 239,082 |
| | $ | (13,387 | ) | | $ | (17,295 | ) |
| |
| (a) | Amounts exclude related tax benefits of $81.2$84.5 millionand $85.7$79.0 millionfor December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively, which are also included in accumulated other comprehensive loss. |
The accumulated benefit obligation differs from the projected benefit obligation in that it assumes future compensation levels will remain unchanged. Mattel’s accumulated benefit obligation for its defined benefit pension plans as of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 totaled $618.5$608.4 million and $588.4$549.7 million, respectively.
The assumptions used in determining the projected and accumulated benefit obligations of Mattel’s domestic defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans are as follows:
|
| | | | | |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 |
| Defined benefit pension plans: | | | |
| Discount rate | 3.0 | % | | 4.1 | % |
| Weighted-average rate of future compensation increases | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
| Postretirement benefit plans: | | | |
| Discount rate | 3.0 | % | | 4.1 | % |
| Annual increase in Medicare Part B premium | 6.0 | % | | 6.0 | % |
| Health care cost trend rate: | | | |
| Pre-65 | 7.0 | % | | 7.0 | % |
| Post-65 | 6.8 | % | | 6.8 | % |
| Ultimate cost trend rate: | | | |
| Pre-65 | 4.5 | % | | 4.5 | % |
| Post-65 | 4.5 | % | | 4.5 | % |
| Year that the rate reaches the ultimate cost trend rate: | | | |
| Pre-65 | 2026 |
| | 2025 |
|
| Post-65 | 2026 |
| | 2025 |
|
|
| | | | | |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| Defined benefit pension plans: | | | |
| Discount rate | 3.4 | % | | 3.9 | % |
| Weighted average rate of future compensation increases | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
| Postretirement benefit plans: | | | |
| Discount rate | 3.4 | % | | 3.9 | % |
| Annual increase in Medicare Part B premium | 6.0 | % | | 6.0 | % |
| Health care cost trend rate: | | | |
| Pre-65 | 7.0 | % | | 7.0 | % |
| Post-65 | 7.8 | % | | 7.8 | % |
| Ultimate cost trend rate: | | | |
| Pre-65 | 4.5 | % | | 4.5 | % |
| Post-65 | 4.5 | % | | 4.5 | % |
| Year that the rate reaches the ultimate cost trend rate: | | | |
| Pre-65 | 2024 |
| | 2024 |
|
| Post-65 | 2024 |
| | 2024 |
|
A one percentage point increase/(decrease) in the assumed health care cost trend rate for each future year would not materially impact the postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2017,2019, or the service and interest cost recognized for 2017.2019.
The estimated future benefit payments for Mattel’s defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Defined Benefit
Pension Plans | | Postretirement
Benefit Plans |
| | (In thousands) |
| 2020 | $ | 37,686 |
| | $ | 750 |
|
| 2021 | 37,456 |
| | 750 |
|
| 2022 | 39,617 |
| | 650 |
|
| 2023 | 38,545 |
| | 650 |
|
| 2024 | 38,912 |
| | 650 |
|
| 2025–2027 | 175,229 |
| | 2,440 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Defined Benefit Pension Plans | | Postretirement Benefit Plans |
| | (In thousands) |
| 2018 | $ | 60,433 |
| | $ | 1,400 |
|
| 2019 | 36,577 |
| | 1,200 |
|
| 2020 | 36,500 |
| | 1,100 |
|
| 2021 | 36,555 |
| | 1,100 |
|
| 2022 | 37,686 |
| | 1,000 |
|
| 2022 – 2026 | 182,421 |
| | 2,600 |
|
Mattel expects to make cash contributions totaling approximately $18$11 million to its defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans in 2018,2020, substantially all of which iswill be for benefit payments for its unfunded plans.
Mattel periodically commissions a study of the plans’ assets and liabilities to determine an asset allocation that would best match expected cash flows from the plans’ assets to expected benefit payments. Mattel monitors the returns earned by the plans’ assets and reallocates investments as needed. Mattel’s overall investment strategy is to achieve an adequately diversified asset allocation mix of investments that provides for both near-term benefit payments as well as long-term growth. The assets are invested in a combination of indexed and actively managed funds. The target allocations for Mattel’s domestic plan assets, which comprise 77% of Mattel’s total plan assets, are 42% in U.S. equities, 28% in non-U.S. equities, 20% in fixed income securities, and 10% in real estate securities. The U.S. equities are benchmarked against the S&P 500, and the non-U.S. equities are benchmarked against a combination of developed and emerging markets indices. Fixed income securities are long-duration bonds intended to closely match the duration of the liabilities and include U.S. government treasuries and agencies, corporate bonds from various industries, and mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities.
Mattel’s defined benefit pension plan assets are measured and reported in the consolidated financial statements at fair value using inputs, which are more fully described in "Note 1011 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Fair Value Measurements," as follows:
| | | | December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2019 |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| | (In thousands) | (In thousands) |
| U.S. government and U.S. government agency securities | $ | — |
| | $ | 5,101 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 5,101 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 16,196 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 16,196 |
|
| U.S. corporate debt instruments | — |
| | 37,323 |
| | — |
| | 37,323 |
| — |
| | 57,669 |
| | — |
| | 57,669 |
|
| International corporate debt instruments | — |
| | 11,137 |
| | — |
| | 11,137 |
| — |
| | 14,088 |
| | — |
| | 14,088 |
|
Mutual funds | 611 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 611 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 74,750 |
|
| Money market funds | 1,975 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,975 |
| 618 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 618 |
|
| Other investments | — |
| | 6,968 |
| | — |
| | 6,968 |
| — |
| | 14,952 |
| | — |
| | 14,952 |
|
| Insurance "buy-in" policy | — |
| | — |
| | 33,553 |
| | 33,553 |
| — |
| | — |
| | 31,281 |
| | 31,281 |
|
| Collective trust funds: | | | | | | | | |
| Collective trust funds (a): | | | | | | | | |
U.S. equity securities (a) | | | | | | | 73,727 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 78,170 |
|
International equity securities (a) | | | | | | | 234,472 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 89,381 |
|
International fixed income (a) | | | | | | | 16,179 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 15,387 |
|
Diversified funds (a) | | | | | | | 39,906 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 39,255 |
|
| Total | $ | 2,586 |
| | $ | 60,529 |
| | $ | 33,553 |
| | $ | 460,952 |
| $ | 618 |
| | $ | 102,905 |
| | $ | 31,281 |
| | $ | 431,747 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2018 |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| U.S. government and U.S. government agency securities | $ | — |
| | $ | 8,803 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 8,803 |
|
| U.S. corporate debt instruments | — |
| | 45,714 |
| | — |
| | 45,714 |
|
| International corporate debt instruments | — |
| | 13,034 |
| | — |
| | 13,034 |
|
| Mutual funds | 610 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 610 |
|
| Money market funds | 303 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 303 |
|
| Other investments | — |
| | 7,964 |
| | — |
| | 7,964 |
|
| Insurance "buy-in" policy | — |
| | — |
| | 29,857 |
| | 29,857 |
|
| Collective trust funds (a): | | | | | | | |
| U.S. equity securities |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 69,699 |
|
| International equity securities |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 176,103 |
|
| International fixed income |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 14,752 |
|
| Diversified funds |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 35,090 |
|
| Total | $ | 913 |
| | $ | 75,515 |
| | $ | 29,857 |
| | $ | 401,929 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2016 |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| U.S. government and U.S. government agency securities | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,568 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,568 |
|
| U.S. corporate debt instruments | — |
| | 33,787 |
| | — |
| | 33,787 |
|
| International corporate debt instruments | — |
| | 8,689 |
| | — |
| | 8,689 |
|
| Mutual funds | 582 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 582 |
|
| Money market funds | 2,531 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,531 |
|
| Other investments | — |
| | 6,640 |
| | — |
| | 6,640 |
|
| Collective trust funds: | | | | | | | |
| U.S. equity securities (a) | | | | | | | 96,487 |
|
| International equity securities (a) | | | | | | | 239,177 |
|
| International fixed income (a) | | | | | | | 44,319 |
|
| Total | $ | 3,113 |
| | $ | 50,684 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 433,780 |
|
(a) These investments consist of privately placed funds that are valued based on net asset value per share. The fair value amounts presented in this table are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the statement of financial position and its related disclosures.
| |
| (a) | These investments consist of privately placed funds that are valued based on net asset value per share. The fair value amounts presented in this table are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the statement of financial position and its related disclosures. |
The fair value of collective trust funds are determined based on the net asset value per share held at year-end. The fair value of mutual funds, money market funds, U.S. government securities, U.S. government agency securities, and corporate debt instruments, mutual funds, and money market funds are determined based on quoted market prices or are estimated using pricing models with observable inputs or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics.
In December 2017, Mattel entered into an insurance buy-in policy contract with a private limited life insurance company to insure a portion of the U.K. pension plan, covering roughlyapproximately 40% of the total membership in the plan. The assets and liabilities inwith respect ofto insured pensioners are assumed to match for the purposes of ASC 715, Pension -— Retirement Benefits (i.e. the full benefits have been insured). The initial value of the asset associated with this policy iswas equal to the premium paid to secure the policy, and is adjusted each reporting period for changes in interest rates, discount rates, and benefits paid. As the valuation of this asset is judgmental, and there are no observable inputs associated with the valuation, the buy-in contract is classified as Level 3 on the fair value hierarchy.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
| | | | Level 3 | Level 3 |
| | (in thousands) | (in thousands) |
| Balance at December 31, 2016 | $ | — |
| |
| Purchase of asset (a) | 33,155 |
| |
| Balance at December 31, 2017 | | $ | 33,553 |
|
| Purchases, sales, and settlements (a) | | — |
|
| Change in fair value | 398 |
| (3,696 | ) |
| Balance at December 31, 2017 | $ | 33,553 |
| |
| Balance at December 31, 2018 | | 29,857 |
|
| Purchases, sales, and settlements (a) | | — |
|
| Change in fair value | | 1,424 |
|
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | | $ | 31,281 |
|
(a) There were no sales or settlements of Level 3 assets, or transfers in or out of Level 3, for the year ended December 31, 2017.
| |
| (a) | There were no purchases, sales, or settlements of Level 3 assets, or transfers in or out of Level 3, for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. |
Mattel’s defined benefit pension plan assets are not directly invested in Mattel common stock. Mattel believes that the long-term rate of return on plan assets of 6.3%6.0% as of December 31, 20172019 is reasonable based on historical returns.
Defined Contribution Retirement Plans
Domestic employees are eligible to participate in a 401(k) savings plan, the Mattel, Inc. Personal Investment Plan (the "Plan"), sponsored by Mattel, which is a funded defined contribution plan intended to comply with ERISA’s requirements. Contributions to the Plan include voluntary contributions by eligible employees and employer automatic and matching contributions by Mattel. The Plan allows employees to allocate both their voluntary contributions and their employer automatic and matching contributions to a variety of investment funds, including a fund that is invested in Mattel common stock (the "Mattel Stock Fund"). Employees are not required to allocate any of their Plan account balance to the Mattel Stock Fund, allowing employees to limit or eliminate their exposure to market changes in Mattel’s stock price. Furthermore, the Plan limits the percentage of the employee’s total account balance that may be allocated to the Mattel Stock Fund to 25%. Employees may generally reallocate their account balances on a daily basis. However, pursuant to Mattel’s insider trading policy, employees classified as insiders and restricted personnel under Mattel’s insider trading policy are limited to certain periods in which they may make allocations into or out of the Mattel Stock Fund.
Certain non-U.S. employees participate in other defined contribution retirement plans with varying vesting and contribution provisions.
Deferred Compensation and Excess Benefit Plans
Mattel maintains a deferred compensation plan that permits certain officers and key employees to elect to defer portions of their compensation. The deferred compensation plan, together with certain contributions made by Mattel and participating employees to an excess benefit plan, earns various rates of return. The liability for these plans as of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 was $76.6$65.2 million and $70.0$68.3 million, respectively, and is primarily included in other noncurrent liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the market value of the participant-selected investment options are recorded as retirement plan expense within other selling and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. Separately, Mattel has purchased group trust-owned life insurance contracts designed to assist in funding these programs. The cash surrender value of these policies, valued at $67.9$75.7 million and $70.9$65.8 million as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively, are held in an irrevocable grantor trust, the assets of which are subject to the claims of Mattel’s creditors and are included in other noncurrent assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
Annual Incentive Compensation Plans
Mattel has annual incentive compensation plans under which officers and key employees may earn incentive compensation based on Mattel’s performance and are subject to certain approvals of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. ForIncentive compensation for 2019, 2018, and 2017, 2016,was $119.5 million, $84.1 million, and 2015, $19.4 million, $16.5 million, and $50.2 million, respectively, was charged to expense for awards under these plans.plans and was included in other selling and administrative expenses.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Mattel had three3 long-term incentive program ("LTIP") performance cycles in place for the time period between 2015 and 2017: (i) a January 1, 2014—December 31, 2016 performance cycle,in 2019, which waswere established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors ("the Committee") in March 2014, (ii) a January 1, 2016—December 31, 2018 performance cycle, which was established by the Committee in March 2016, and (iii)Directors: (i) a January 1, 2017—December 31, 2019 performance cycle which was established by the Committee in March 2017.
For the(ii) a January 1, 2014—2018—December 31, 20162020 performance cycle, and (iii) a January 1, 2019—December 31, 2021 performance cycle.
Under the LTIP performance cycle, Mattel granted performance-based restricted stock units ("Performance RSUs") under the Mattel, Inc. 2010 Equity and Long-Term Compensation Plan tocycles in place in 2019, officers and certainkey employees providing services to Mattel. Performance RSUs granted under this program could be earnedmay earn incentive compensation based on an initial target number with the final number of Performance RSUs payable being determined based on the productMattel’s performance and are subject to certain approvals of the initial target number of Performance RSUs multiplied by a performance factor based on measurements of Mattel’s performance with respect to: (i) annual operating result targets for each year in the performance cycle using a net operating profit after taxes less capital charge measure and a net sales performance measure ("the 2014-2016 performance-related components"), and (ii) Mattel’s total stock return ("TSR") for the three-year performance cycle relative to the TSR realized by companies comprising the S&P 500 asCompensation Committee of the first dayBoard of the performance cycle ("the 2014-2016 market-related component"), adjustedDirectors. Long-term incentive compensation for dividends declared during the three-year performance cycle. The Performance RSUs also had dividend equivalent rights that could be converted to shares of Mattel common stock only when2019, 2018, and to the extent the underlying Performance RSUs were earned2017, was $11.0 million, $3.0 million, and paid in shares of Mattel common stock. For the January 1, 2014—December 31, 2016 LTIP performance cycle, no shares were earned relating to the 2014-2016 performance-related components, market-related component, or dividend equivalent rights.
For the January 1, 2014—December 31, 2016 LTIP performance cycle, the weighted average grant date fair values of the performance-related$0.6 million, respectively, and market-related components of the Performance RSUs were $32.60was included within other selling and $(3.57) per share, respectively, for 2016, $23.14 and $(3.57) per share, respectively, for 2015, and $39.03 and $(3.57) per share, respectively, for 2014. During 2016, 2015, and 2014, no expense was recognized related to the 2014-2016 performance cycle, as no shares were earned.
For the January 1, 2016—December 31, 2018 LTIP performance cycle, Mattel granted Performance RSUs under the Mattel, Inc. Amended and Restated 2010 Equity and Long-Term Compensation Plan to senior executives providing services to Mattel. Performance RSUs granted under this program are also earned based on an initial target number with the final number of Performance RSUs payable being determined based on the product of the initial target number of Performance RSUs multiplied by a performance factor based on measurements of Mattel's performance with respect to (i) a cumulative three-year EPS target for the performance cycle (the "2016-2018 performance-related component") and (ii) Mattel's TSR for the three-year performance cycle relative to the TSR realized by companies comprising the S&P 500 as of the first day of the performance cycle (the "2016-2018 market-related component"), adjusted for dividends declared during the three-year performance cycle. The Performance RSUs also have dividend equivalent rights that are converted to shares of Mattel common stock only when and to the extent the underlying Performance RSUs are earned and paid in shares of Mattel common stock. For the 2016-2018 performance-related component, the range of possible outcomes is that between zero and 0.4 million shares could be earned. For the 2016-2018 market-related component, the possible outcomes range from an upward adjustment of 0.2 million shares to a downward adjustment of 0.2 million shares to the result of the performance-related component. Mattel believes that the likelihood that shares will be earned under the 2016-2018 performance cycle is remote.
For the January 1, 2016—December 31, 2018 LTIP performance cycle, the weighted average grant date fair value of the performance-related and market-related components of the Performance RSUs were $32.60 and $5.10 per share, respectively, for 2017 and 2016. During 2017, Mattel recognized share-based compensation expense of $0.4 million related to the 2016-2018 market-related component. Mattel also reversed $2.8 million of expense related to the 2016-2018 performance-related component that was previously recognized in 2016, as it was determined that it is unlikely that performance shares will be earned for this performance cycle. During 2016, Mattel recognized share-based compensation expense of $2.8 million related to the 2016-2018 performance-related component and $0.4 million related to the 2016-2018 market-related component.
For the January 1, 2017—December 31, 2019 LTIP performance cycle, Mattel granted Performance RSUs under the Mattel, Inc. Amended and Restated 2010 Equity and Long-Term Compensation Plan to senior executives. Performance RSUs granted under this program are earned based on the product of the initial target number of Performance RSUs multiplied by a performance factor based on a three-year average of annual achievements of Mattel's performance with respect to annual EPS targets for the performance cycle (the "2017-2019 performance-related component") and then adjusted upward or downward based on Mattel's TSR for the three-year performance cycle relative to the TSR realized by companies comprising the S&P 500 as of the first day of the performance cycle (the "2017-2019 market-related component"). The Performance RSUs under the 2017-2019 LTIP performance cycle have dividend equivalent rights that are converted to shares of Mattel common stock only when and to the extent the underlying Performance RSUs are earned and paid. For the 2017-2019 performance-related component, the range of possible outcomes is that between zero and 0.4 million shares could be earned. For the 2017-2019 market-related component, the possible outcomes range from an upward adjustment of 0.2 million shares to a downward adjustment of 0.2 million shares to the result of the performance-related component.
For the January 1, 2017—December 31, 2019 LTIP performance cycle, the weighted average grant date fair value of the performance-related and market-related components of the Performance RSUs were $21.60 and $1.46 per share, respectively, for 2017. During 2017, Mattel did not recognize any share-based compensation expense relating to the 2017-2019 performance-related component, and recognized share-based compensation expense of $0.2 million relating to the 2017-2019 market-related component.
The fair values of the performance-related components were based on the closing stock prices of Mattel’s common stock on each of the grant dates. The fair values of the market-related components were estimated at the grant dates using a Monte Carlo valuation methodology.administrative expenses.
Note 5—Seasonal Financing and Debt
Seasonal Financing
On December 20, 2017, Mattel entered into a syndicated facility agreement (the “Credit Agreement”"Credit Agreement"), as a borrower thereunder (in such capacity, the “Borrower”"Borrower"), along with certain of Mattel’s domestic subsidiaries, as additional borrowers thereunder (together with the Borrower, the “U.S. Borrowers”"U.S. Borrowers"), Mattel Canada Inc. as a borrower thereunder (the “Canadian Borrower”"Canadian Borrower"), certain additional domestic and foreign subsidiaries of Mattel, as guarantors thereunder, Bank of America, N.A., as global administrative agent, collateral agent, Australian security trustee, and lender, and the other lenders and financial institutions party thereto, providing for $1.60 billion in aggregate principal amount of senior secured revolving credit facilities (the “new"senior secured revolving credit facilities"). The senior secured revolving credit facilities”), consistingfacilities consist of an asset based lending facility with aggregate commitments of approximately $1.31 billion, subject to borrowing base capacity, and a revolving credit facility with $294.0 million in aggregate commitments secured by certain fixed assets and intellectual property of the U.S. Borrowers and certain equity interests in various subsidiaries of Mattel, subject to borrowing base capacity (the “Fixed"Fixed Asset & IP Facility”Facility"). The new senior secured revolving credit facilities will mature on December 20, 2020.November 18, 2022.
A portionOn March 28, 2018 and March 29, 2018, Mattel, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries entered into various foreign joinder agreements to the Credit Agreement. The foreign joinder agreements join the relevant foreign borrowers and foreign lenders to the Credit Agreement, as contemplated therein, making portions of the new senior secured revolving credit facilities (the “U.S. Subfacility”) is currently available to other subsidiaries of Mattel, Inc. such that, together with the U.S. Borrowers. A portion ofinitial entry into the newCredit Agreement, the senior secured revolving credit facilities (the “Canadian Subfacility”) is also currentlyare available to the “Canadian Borrower”. Upon the satisfaction of various deliverables and other conditions, other internationalcertain subsidiaries of Mattel, will joinInc., in their capacity as borrowers, located in the following jurisdictions: (i) the United States (the "U.S. Borrowers"), (ii) Canada (the "Canadian Borrower"), (iii) Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (the "European (GNU) Borrowers"), (iv) Spain (the "Spanish Borrower"), (v) France (the "French Borrower"), and (vi) Australia (the "Australian Borrower"), in each case through subfacilities in each such jurisdiction (each, a "Subfacility"). Through the initial Credit Agreement and the foreign joinder agreements, certain additional domestic and foreign subsidiaries of Mattel Inc., are also parties to the Credit Agreement as borrowers and portionsguarantors of various obligations of the new senior secured revolving credit facilities will also become availableborrowers under the Credit Agreement as further described below.
On December 14, 2018, Mattel, Inc. entered into an amendment to such borrowers, including (i) a portion (the “French Subfacility”) tothe Credit Agreement, which included the expansion of eligibility criteria for accounts receivable and inventory included in the borrowing base. In support of the foregoing, two additional Mattel France (the “French Borrower”), (ii) a portion (the “Spanish Subfacility”) tosubsidiaries, Mattel España, S.A. (the “Spanish Borrower”Import Services, LLC ("MISL"), (iii) a portion (the “European (GNU) Subfacility”) to Mattel Europa B.V., Mattel U.K. Limited, HIT Entertainment Limited, Gullane (Thomas) Limited, and Mattel GMBH (collectively,Finco Europe B.V. ("Mattel Finco") were added as borrowers to the “European (GNU) Borrowers”)Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement allows for certain inventory located in the Czech Republic and (iv)the Netherlands to be included in the borrowing base. Additionally, certain accounts receivable with account debtors located in Italy and Poland, as well as other countries agreed upon with the Administrative Agent, may be purchased by Mattel Finco and added to the borrowing base in the future.
On November 20, 2019, Mattel, Inc. entered into an amendment to the Credit Agreement, which included, but not limited to, amendments to certain definitions related to the borrowing base, a portion (the “Australian Subfacility”) to Mattel Pty Ltd. (the “Australian Borrower”).reduction in certain interest rates thereunder and an extension of the maturity date thereof. Each of the facilities under the Credit Agreement will mature, and lending commitments thereunder will terminate, on November 18, 2022.
Borrowings under the new senior secured revolving credit facilities will (i) be limited by jurisdiction-specific borrowing base calculations based on the sum of specified percentages of eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory and certain fixed assets and intellectual property, as applicable, minus the amount of any applicable reserves, and (ii) bear interest at a floating rate, which can be either, at the Borrower’s option, (a) an adjusted LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.25% to 3.00%2.75% per annum or (b) an alternate base rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.25% to 2.00%1.75% per annum, in each case, such applicable margins to be determined based on the Borrower’s average borrowing availability remaining under the new senior secured revolving credit facilities.
In addition to paying interest on the outstanding principal under the new senior secured revolving credit facilities, the Borrower will be required to pay (i) an unused line fee per annum of the average daily unused portion of the new senior secured revolving credit facilities;facilities, (ii) a letter of credit fronting fee based on a percentage of the aggregate face amount of outstanding letters of credit;credit, and (iii) certain other customary fees and expenses of the lenders and agents. Outstanding letters of credit under the senior secured revolving credit facilities totaled approximately $55 million as of December 31, 2019.
The U.S. Borrowers, as well as certain U.S. subsidiaries of the Borrower (the “U.S. Guarantors”"U.S. Guarantors"), are initially guaranteeing the obligations of all Borrowers under the new senior secured revolving credit facilities. Additionally, the obligations of the Canadian Borrower, the French Borrower, the Spanish Borrower, the European (GNU) Borrowers and the Australian Borrower (collectively, the “Foreign Borrowers”"Foreign Borrowers"), will respectively each be guaranteed by the obligations of the other Foreign Borrowers, as well as certain additional foreign subsidiaries (“("Foreign Guarantors”Guarantors").
The U.S. Subfacility is secured by liens on substantially all of the U.S. Borrowers’ and the U.S. Guarantors’ accounts receivable and inventory (the “U.S."U.S. Current Assets Collateral”Collateral"). The Canadian Subfacility, is, and the French Subfacility, the Spanish Subfacility, the European (GNU) Subfacility, and the Australian Subfacility will be,are, each secured by a first priority lien on (i) the accounts receivable and inventory of the applicable Foreign Borrower(s) and Foreign Guarantors under such facility, and (ii) the U.S. Current Assets Collateral. The Fixed Asset & IP Facility is secured by a first priority lien on certain owned real property in the U.S., certain U.S. trademarks and patents, and 100% of the equity interests in the U.S. Borrowers (aside from Mattel) and U.S. Guarantors, as well as 65% of the voting equity interests and 100% of the non-voting equity interests in Mattel Holdings Limited. Upon the additional Foreign Borrowers and Foreign Guarantors joining the Credit Agreement, the Fixed Asset & IP Facility will also be secured by 65% of the voting equity interests of such additional Foreign Borrowers and Foreign Guarantors that are directly owned by a U.S. Borrower or U.S. Guarantor. The net book value of the accounts receivable, inventory, and inventory ofcertain owned real property in the U.S. Borrowers, U.S. Guarantors, Canadian Borrower and the current Foreign Guarantor of the Canadian Subfacility, together with the non-current assets currently pledged as collateral under the new senior secured revolving credit facilities was approximately $900$800 million as of December 31, 2017.2019.
The Credit Agreement contains customary covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions on the Borrower’s and its subsidiaries’ ability to merge and consolidate with other companies, incur indebtedness, grant liens or security interests on assets, make acquisitions, loans, advances, or investments, pay dividends, sell or otherwise transfer assets outside of the ordinary course, optionally prepay or modify terms of any junior indebtedness, enter into transactions with affiliates, or change their line of business.
The Credit Agreement requires the maintenance of a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.00 to 1.00 at the end of each fiscal quarter when excess availability under the new senior secured revolving credit facilities is less than the greater of (x) $100 million and (y) 10% of the aggregate amount available thereunder (the “Availability Threshold”"Availability Threshold") and on the last day of each subsequent fiscal quarter ending thereafter until no event of default exists and excess availability is greater than the Availability Threshold for at least 30 consecutive days.
Since Mattel had no0 borrowings to-date under the new senior secured revolving credit facilities as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. Since the execution of the Credit Agreement, the fixed charge coverage ratio covenant washas not been in effect as no event of December 31, 2017.default occurred and as Mattel's excess availability was greater than $100 million and the Availability Threshold. As of December 31, 2017,2019 and 2018, Mattel was in compliance with all covenants contained in the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement is a material agreement, and failure to comply with the covenants may result in an event of default under the terms of the new senior secured revolving credit facilities. If Mattel were to default under the terms of the new senior secured revolving credit facilities, its ability to meet its seasonal financing requirements could be adversely affected.
Furthermore, in connection with the entry into the new senior secured revolving credit facilities, Mattel terminated the commitments and satisfied all outstanding obligations under its previous Credit Agreement, amended on June 8, 2015 (the "previous Credit Agreement"). The previous Credit Agreement, governing an unsecured committed revolving credit facility (the "previous Credit Facility") was used as a back-up to Mattel’s commercial paper program. The aggregate commitments under the previous Credit Facility was $1.60 billion. Applicable interest rate margins were within a range of 0.00% to 0.75% above the applicable base rate for base rate loans and 0.88% to 1.75% above the applicable LIBOR for Eurodollar rate loans, and the commitment fees ranged from 0.08% to 0.25% of the unused commitments under the Credit Facility, in each case depending on Mattel’s senior unsecured long-term debt rating.
To finance seasonal working capital requirements of certain foreign subsidiaries, Mattel avails itself of individual short-term credit lines with a number of banks.lines. As of December 31, 2017,2019, foreign credit lines totaled approximately $110$13 million. Mattel expects to extend the majority of these credit lines throughout 2018.2020.
Mattel believes its cash on hand, amounts available under the new senior secured revolving credit facilities, and its foreign credit lines will be adequate to meet its seasonal financing requirements in 2018.2020.
Additionally, sales of foreign receivables occur periodically to finance seasonal working capital requirements. TheAs of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were 0 outstanding amounts of accounts receivable that have beenwere sold under international factoring arrangements were approximately $19 million and $18 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These amounts have been excluded from Mattel’s consolidated balance sheets.arrangements.
Short-Term Borrowings
As of December 31, 2017,2019, Mattel had no0 borrowings outstanding under the new senior secured revolving credit facilities and no0 foreign short-term bank loans outstanding. As of December 31, 2016,2018, Mattel had $192.2 million of short-term borrowing0 borrowings outstanding which included $47.2under the senior secured revolving credit facilities and $4.2 million of foreign short-term bank loans outstanding and $145.0 million of commercial paper outstanding under its previous Credit Facility.
outstanding.
During 20172019 and 2016,2018, Mattel had average borrowings under its foreign short-term bank loans of $0 and $2.0 million, respectively, and average borrowings under the previous Credit Facilitysenior secured revolving credit facilities and other short-term borrowings of $811.5$89.0 million and $728.4$126.2 million, respectively, to help finance its seasonal working capital requirements. The weighted averageweighted-average interest rate on foreign short-term bank loans during 2016 was 12.5%. The weighted average interest rate onborrowings under the previous Credit Facilitysenior secured revolving credit facilities and other short-term borrowings during 20172019 and 20162018 was 1.6%3.6% and 0.6%3.9%, respectively. Mattel's average borrowings on its foreign short-term bank loans were not material during 2019 and 2018.
Long-Term Debt
In December 2017,November 2019, Mattel issued $1.00 billion$600 million aggregate principal amount of 6.75%5.875% senior unsecured notes due December 31, 202515, 2027 ("20172019 Senior Notes"). The 20172019 Senior Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture, dated DecemberNovember 20, 2017,2019, among Mattel, the guarantors named therein, and MUFG Union Bank, N.A., as Trustee (the “Indenture”"Indenture"). Interest on the 20172019 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 3015 and December 3115 of each year, beginning on June 30, 2018.15, 2020. Mattel may redeem all or part of the 20172019 Senior Notes at any time or from time to time prior to December 31, 202015, 2022 at its option, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus a "make whole" premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest on the 20172019 Senior Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date. Mattel may also redeem up to 40% of the principal amount of the 20172019 Senior Notes at any time or from time to time prior to December 31, 202015, 2022 at its option, at a redemption price equal to 106.75%105.875% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest on the 20172019 Senior Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date, with the net cash proceeds of sales of one or more equity offerings by Mattel or any direct or indirect parent of Mattel. Mattel may redeem all or part of the 20172019 Senior Notes at any time or from time to time on or after December 31, 2020,15, 2022, at its option, at a redemption price including a call premium that varies (from 0% to 5.063%4.406%) depending on the year of redemption, plus accrued and unpaid interest on the 20172019 Senior Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date.
The 20172019 Senior Notes are Mattel’s and the guarantors’ senior unsecured obligations. The 20172019 Senior Notes are guaranteed by Mattel's existing and, subject to certain exceptions, future wholly-owned domestic restricted subsidiaries that guarantee Mattel’s new2017/2018 Senior Notes due 2025 and senior secured revolving credit facilities or certain other indebtedness. Under the terms of the Indenture, the 20172019 Senior Notes rank equally in right of payment with all of Mattel’s existing and future senior debt, including Mattel’s Existing Notes (as defined in the Indenture) and borrowings under the new senior secured revolving credit facilities, and rank senior in right of payment to Mattel's existing and future debt and other obligations that expressly provide for their subordination to the 20172019 Senior Notes. The 20172019 Senior Notes are structurally subordinated to all of the existing and future liabilities, including trade payables, of the Mattel’s subsidiaries that do not guarantee the 20172019 Senior Notes (including the Canadian Subfacility, the French Subfacility, the Spanish Subfacility, the European (GNU) Subfacility and, the Australian Subfacility of the new senior secured revolving credit facilitiesfacilities) and are effectively subordinated to Mattel’s and the guarantors’ existing and future senior secured debt to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such debt (including borrowings under the new senior secured revolving credit facilities). The guarantees are, with respect to the assets of the guarantors of the 20172019 Senior Notes, structurally senior to all of Mattel’s existing indebtedness, future indebtedness or other liabilities that are not guaranteed by such guarantors, including Mattel’s obligations under the Existing Notes.Notes (other than the 2017/2018 Senior Notes due 2025).
The Indenture contains covenants that limit Mattel’s (and some of its subsidiaries’) ability to, among other things: (i) incur additional debt or issue certain preferred shares; (ii) pay dividends on or make other distributions in respect of their capital stock or make other restricted payments; (iii) make investments in unrestricted subsidiaries; (iv) create liens; (v) enter into certain sale/leaseback transactions; (vi) merge or consolidate, or sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of substantially all of their assets; and (vii) designate subsidiaries as unrestricted.
In August 2016,December 2019, Mattel issued $350.0 million aggregate principal amountused the net proceeds from the issuance of 2.35% senior unsecured notes due August 15, 2021 ("2016 Senior Notes"). Interest on the 20162019 Senior Notes, is payable semi-annually in arrearsplus cash on February 15hand, to redeem and August 15retire all of each year, beginning February 15, 2017. Mattel may redeemthe 2010 Senior Notes due October 1, 2020 and all or part of the 2016 Senior Notes at any time or from time to time prior to Julydue August 15, 2021, (one month prior to the maturity date of the 2016 Senior Notes), at its option, at a redemption price equal to the greaterprincipal amount, plus "make-whole" premium, and accrued and unpaid interest. Upon redemption, Mattel recognized total debt extinguishment costs, including write off of (1) 100%debt issuance costs, of $9.2 million which were recorded within interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
In May 2018, Mattel issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2016its 6.75% senior unsecured notes due December 31, 2025 ("2018 Senior Notes"). The 2018 Senior Notes being redeemed or (2)were issued pursuant to a "make-whole"supplemental indenture, dated May 31, 2018 (the "Supplemental Indenture"), as additional notes under the Indenture, dated December 20, 2017, pursuant to which Mattel previously issued $1.00 billion in aggregate principal amount based on the yield of a comparable U.S. Treasury security plus 20 basis points, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the 2016existing 6.75% Senior Notes being redeemed to, but excluding,due 2025 ("2017 Senior Notes"). The 2018 Senior Notes formed a single series and trade interchangeably with the redemption date.2017 Senior Notes. The 2018 Senior Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by all of Mattel's existing and future wholly-owned domestic restricted subsidiaries that are borrowers or guarantors under its senior secured revolving credit facilities.
In June 2018, Mattel may redeem all or partused the net proceeds from the issuance of the 20162018 Senior Notes, at any time or from timeplus cash on hand, to time on or after July 15, 2021, atredeem and retire all of its option,2014 Senior Notes due May 6, 2019 at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount, of the 2016 Senior Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest on the 2016 Senior Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date.interest.
Mattel’s 2010 Senior Notes bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 4.35% to 6.20%, with a weighted average interest rate of 5.28% as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. Mattel’s 2011 Senior Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.45% as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. Mattel’s 2013 Senior Notes bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 1.70% to 3.15%, with a weighted average interest rate of 2.43% as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. Mattel’s 2014 Senior Notes, 2016 Senior Notes, and 2017 Senior Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 2.35%, 2.35%, and 6.75%, respectively, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
On November 1, 2016,In March 2018, Mattel repaid $300.0$250.0 million of its 2.50%2013 Senior Notes in connection with the scheduled maturity.
Mattel’s long-term debt consists of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Interest Rate | | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 |
| | | | (In thousands) |
| 2010 Senior Notes due October 2020 and October 2040 (a) | 4.35% - 6.20% |
| | $ | 250,000 |
| | $ | 500,000 |
|
| 2011 Senior Notes due November 2041 | 5.45 | % | | 300,000 |
| | 300,000 |
|
| 2013 Senior Notes due March 2023 | 3.15 | % | | 250,000 |
| | 250,000 |
|
| 2016 Senior Notes due August 2021 | 2.35 | % | | — |
| | 350,000 |
|
| 2017/2018 Senior Notes due December 2025 | 6.75 | % | | 1,500,000 |
| | 1,500,000 |
|
| 2019 Senior Notes due December 2027 | 5.875 | % | | 600,000 |
| | — |
|
| Debt issuance costs and debt discount | | | (53,249 | ) | | (48,277 | ) |
| | | | 2,846,751 |
| | 2,851,723 |
|
| Less: current portion | | | — |
| | — |
|
| Total long-term debt | | | $ | 2,846,751 |
| | $ | 2,851,723 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| | (In thousands) |
| 2010 Senior Notes due October 2020 and October 2040 | $ | 500,000 |
| | $ | 500,000 |
|
| 2011 Senior Notes due November 2041 | 300,000 |
| | 300,000 |
|
| 2013 Senior Notes due March 2018 and March 2023 | 500,000 |
| | 500,000 |
|
| 2014 Senior Notes due May 2019 | 500,000 |
| | 500,000 |
|
| 2016 Senior Notes due August 2021 | 350,000 |
| | 350,000 |
|
| 2017 Senior Notes due December 2025 | 1,000,000 |
| | — |
|
| Debt issuance costs and debt discount | (26,881 | ) | | (15,729 | ) |
| | 3,123,119 |
| | 2,134,271 |
|
| Less: current portion | (250,000 | ) | | — |
|
| Total long-term debt | $ | 2,873,119 |
| | $ | 2,134,271 |
|
The aggregate principal amount of long-term debt maturing in the next five years and thereafter is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2010
Senior
Notes | | 2011
Senior
Notes | | 2013
Senior
Notes | | 2017/2018
Senior
Notes | | 2019 Senior Notes | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| 2020 | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| 2021 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| 2022 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| 2023 | — |
| | — |
| | 250,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 250,000 |
|
| 2024 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Thereafter | 250,000 |
| | 300,000 |
| | — |
| | 1,500,000 |
| | 600,000 |
| | 2,650,000 |
|
| | $ | 250,000 |
| | $ | 300,000 |
| | $ | 250,000 |
| | $ | 1,500,000 |
| | $ | 600,000 |
| | $ | 2,900,000 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2010 Senior Notes | | 2011 Senior Notes | | 2013 Senior Notes | | 2014 Senior Notes | | 2016 Senior Notes | | 2017 Senior Notes | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| 2018 | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 250,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 250,000 |
|
| 2019 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 500,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 500,000 |
|
| 2020 | 250,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 250,000 |
|
| 2021 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 350,000 |
| | — |
| | 350,000 |
|
| 2022 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
|
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Thereafter | 250,000 |
| | 300,000 |
| | 250,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,000,000 |
| | 1,800,000 |
|
| | $ | 500,000 |
| | $ | 300,000 |
| | $ | 500,000 |
| | $ | 500,000 |
| | $ | 350,000 |
| | $ | 1,000,000 |
| | $ | 3,150,000 |
|
Note 6—Stockholders’ Equity
Preference Stock
Mattel is authorized to issue up to 20.0 million shares of $0.01 par value preference stock, of which noneNaN is currently outstanding.
Preferred Stock
Mattel is authorized to issue up to 3.0 million shares of $1.00 par value preferred stock, of which noneNaN is currently outstanding.
Common Stock Repurchase Program
During 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015,2017, Mattel did not repurchase any shares of its common stock. Mattel’s share repurchase program was first announced on July 21, 2003. On July 17, 2013, the Board of Directors authorized Mattel to increase its share repurchase program by $500.0 million. At December 31, 2017,2019, share repurchase authorizations of $203.0 million had not been executed. Repurchases will take place from time to time, depending on market conditions. Mattel’s share repurchase program has no expiration date.
Dividends
During 2017, 2016,2019 and 2015,2018, Mattel did not pay any dividends to holders of its common stock. During 2017, Mattel paid total dividends per share of $0.91 $1.52, and $1.52, respectively, to holders of its common stock. The Board of Directors declared the dividends, if any, on a quarterly basis, and Mattel paid the dividends during the quarters in which the dividends were declared, if applicable. The payment of dividends on common stock is at the discretion of the Board of Directors and is subject to customary limitations.
In October 2017, Mattel's Board of Directors determined to suspend the Company's quarterly dividend beginning Dividend payments were $312.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2017, which was previously $0.15 per share, in order to increase financial flexibility, strengthen the balance sheet, and facilitate strategic investments.2017.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following tables present changes in the accumulated balances for each component of other comprehensive income (loss) income,, including current period other comprehensive income (loss) income and reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
| | Derivative
Instruments | | Available-for-Sale Security | | Employee Benefit Plans | | Currency
Translation
Adjustments | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax, as of December 31, 2018 | $ | 11,411 |
| | $ | (6,547 | ) | | $ | (142,763 | ) | | $ | (721,327 | ) | | $ | (859,226 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 17,024 |
| | (1,713 | ) | | (31,158 | ) | | 18,919 |
| | 3,072 |
|
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (17,394 | ) | | — |
| | 4,064 |
| | — |
| | (13,330 | ) |
| Net (decrease) increase in other comprehensive income (loss) | (370 | ) | | (1,713 | ) | | (27,094 | ) | | 18,919 |
| | (10,258 | ) |
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax, as of December 31, 2019 | $ | 11,041 |
| | $ | (8,260 | ) | | $ | (169,857 | ) | | $ | (702,408 | ) | | $ | (869,484 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
| | Derivative
Instruments | | Available-for-Sale Security | | Employee Benefit Plans | | Currency
Translation
Adjustments | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax, as of December 31, 2017 | $ | (21,098 | ) | | $ | (2,799 | ) | | $ | (143,213 | ) | | $ | (614,676 | ) | | $ | (781,786 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 24,082 |
| | (3,748 | ) | | (7,382 | ) | | (106,651 | ) | | (93,699 | ) |
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | 8,427 |
| | — |
| | 7,832 |
| | — |
| | 16,259 |
|
| Net increase (decrease) in other comprehensive income (loss) | 32,509 |
| | (3,748 | ) | | 450 |
| | (106,651 | ) | | (77,440 | ) |
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax, as of December 31, 2018 | $ | 11,411 |
| | $ | (6,547 | ) | | $ | (142,763 | ) | | $ | (721,327 | ) | | $ | (859,226 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
| | Derivative
Instruments | | Available-for-Sale Security | | Employee Benefit Plans | | Currency
Translation
Adjustments | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax, as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 17,469 |
| | $ | 3,149 |
| | $ | (157,704 | ) | | $ | (805,943 | ) | | $ | (943,029 | ) |
| Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications | (55,377 | ) | | (5,948 | ) | | 7,812 |
| | 132,294 |
| | 78,781 |
|
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 16,810 |
| | — |
| | 6,679 |
| | 58,973 |
| | 82,462 |
|
| Net (decrease) increase in other comprehensive (loss) income | (38,567 | ) | | (5,948 | ) | | 14,491 |
| | 191,267 |
| | 161,243 |
|
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax, as of December 31, 2017 | $ | (21,098 | ) | | $ | (2,799 | ) | | $ | (143,213 | ) | | $ | (614,676 | ) | | $ | (781,786 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
| | Derivative
Instruments | | Available-for-Sale Security | | Defined Benefit
Pension Plans | | Currency
Translation
Adjustments | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax, as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 17,469 |
| | $ | 3,149 |
| | $ | (157,704 | ) | | $ | (805,943 | ) | | $ | (943,029 | ) |
| Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications | (55,377 | ) | | (5,948 | ) | | 7,812 |
| | 132,294 |
| | 78,781 |
|
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 16,810 |
| | — |
| | 6,679 |
| | 58,973 |
| | 82,462 |
|
| Net (decrease) increase in other comprehensive income | (38,567 | ) | | (5,948 | ) | | 14,491 |
| | 191,267 |
| | 161,243 |
|
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax, as of December 31, 2017 | $ | (21,098 | ) | | $ | (2,799 | ) | | $ | (143,213 | ) | | $ | (614,676 | ) | | $ | (781,786 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 |
| | Derivative
Instruments | | Available-for-Sale Security | | Defined Benefit
Pension Plans | | Currency
Translation
Adjustments | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax, as of December 31, 2015 | $ | 15,363 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (159,858 | ) | | $ | (704,404 | ) | | $ | (848,899 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 18,733 |
| | 3,149 |
| | (4,154 | ) | | (101,539 | ) | | (83,811 | ) |
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (16,627 | ) | | — |
| | 6,308 |
| | — |
| | (10,319 | ) |
| Net increase (decrease) in other comprehensive income | 2,106 |
| | 3,149 |
| | 2,154 |
| | (101,539 | ) | | (94,130 | ) |
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax, as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 17,469 |
| | $ | 3,149 |
| | $ | (157,704 | ) | | $ | (805,943 | ) | | $ | (943,029 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 |
| | Derivative
Instruments | | Available-for-Sale Security | | Defined Benefit
Pension Plans | | Currency
Translation
Adjustments | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax, as of December 31, 2014 | $ | 30,025 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (161,507 | ) | | $ | (490,607 | ) | | $ | (622,089 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 37,926 |
| | — |
| | (6,443 | ) | | (213,797 | ) | | (182,314 | ) |
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (52,588 | ) | | — |
| | 8,092 |
| | — |
| | (44,496 | ) |
| Net (decrease) increase in other comprehensive income | (14,662 | ) | | — |
| | 1,649 |
| | (213,797 | ) | | (226,810 | ) |
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax, as of December 31, 2015 | $ | 15,363 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (159,858 | ) | | $ | (704,404 | ) | | $ | (848,899 | ) |
The following table presents the classification and amount of the reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to the consolidated statements of operations:
| | | | For the Year Ended | | Statements of Operations Classification | For the Year Ended | | Consolidated Statements of Operations Classification |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 | | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 | |
| | (In thousands) | | | (In thousands) | | |
| Derivative Instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Loss) gain on foreign currency forward exchange contracts | $ | (16,717 | ) | | $ | 17,101 |
| | $ | 52,037 |
| | Cost of sales | |
| | (93 | ) | | (474 | ) | | 551 |
| | Provision for income taxes | |
| Gain (loss) on foreign currency forward exchange contracts | | $ | 18,046 |
| | $ | (8,575 | ) | | $ | (16,717 | ) | | Cost of sales |
| Tax effect of net gain (loss) | | (652 | ) | | 148 |
| | (93 | ) | | Provision for income taxes |
| | $ | (16,810 | ) | | $ | 16,627 |
| | $ | 52,588 |
| | Net (loss) income | $ | 17,394 |
| | $ | (8,427 | ) | | $ | (16,810 | ) | | Net loss |
| Defined Benefit Pension Plans | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Amortization of prior service (cost) credit | $ | (29 | ) | | $ | (461 | ) | | $ | 465 |
| | (a) | |
| Amortization of prior service credit (cost) (a) | | $ | 1,974 |
| | $ | 2,008 |
| | $ | (29 | ) | | Other non-operating expense, net |
Recognized actuarial loss | (8,511 | ) | | (7,142 | ) | | (15,316 | ) | | (a) | (7,201 | ) | | (8,198 | ) | | (8,511 | ) | | Other non-operating expense, net |
| Curtailment loss | | (92 | ) | | (739 | ) | | (103 | ) | | Other non-operating expense, net |
| Settlement loss | — |
| | (1,772 | ) | | (6,453 | ) | | Other selling and administrative expenses | — |
| | (3,248 | ) | | — |
| | Other non-operating expense, net |
| Curtailment (loss) gain | (103 | ) | | (415 | ) | | 8,639 |
| | Other selling and administrative expenses | |
| | (8,643 | ) | | (9,790 | ) | | (12,665 | ) | | (5,319 | ) | | (10,177 | ) | | (8,643 | ) | |
| | 1,964 |
| | 3,482 |
| | 4,573 |
| | Provision for income taxes | |
| Tax effect of net loss | | 1,255 |
| | 2,345 |
| | 1,964 |
| | Provision for income taxes |
| | $ | (6,679 | ) | | $ | (6,308 | ) | | $ | (8,092 | ) | | Net (loss) income | $ | (4,064 | ) | | $ | (7,832 | ) | | $ | (6,679 | ) | | Net loss |
| Currency Translation Adjustments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Loss on discontinuation of Venezuelan operations | $ | (58,973 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | Other non-operating expense/income, net | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (58,973 | ) | | Other non-operating expense, net |
| Tax effect of net loss (b) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | Provision for income taxes |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | Provision for income taxes (b) | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (58,973 | ) | | Net loss |
| | $ | (58,973 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | Net (loss) income | |
| |
| (a) | The amortization of prior service credit (cost) credit and recognized actuarial loss are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost. Refer to "Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Employee Benefit Plans" for additional information regarding Mattel’s net periodic benefit cost. |
| |
| (b) | An income tax benefit iswas not expected to be realized related to the loss on discontinuation of Venezuelan operations. |
Currency Translation Adjustments
For 2019, currency translation adjustments resulted in a net gain of $18.9 million, primarily due to the strengthening of the British pound sterling, Russian ruble, and Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar, partially offset by the weakening of the Euro against the U.S. dollar. For 2018, currency translation adjustments resulted in a net loss of $106.7 million, primarily due to the weakening of the Euro, British pound sterling, Russian ruble, and Brazilian real against the U.S. dollar. For 2017, currency translation adjustments resulted in a net gain of $191.3 million, primarily due to the strengthening of the Euro and the British pound sterling against the U.S. dollar and the recognition of a $59.0 million loss related to the discontinuation of Mattel's Venezuelan operations in other non-operating expense/income,expense, net within the consolidated statements of operations. For 2016, currency translation adjustments resulted
Note 7—Leases
Mattel routinely enters into noncancelable lease agreements primarily for premises and equipment used in the normal course of business. Certain of these leases include escalation clauses that adjust rental expense to reflect changes in price indices, as well as renewal and termination options.
Mattel adopted the new lease standard on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective transition method. Prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted and continue to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods. Mattel elected the package of practical expedients, permitted under the transition guidance within the new lease standard, which among other things, allowed Mattel to continue to account for existing leases based on the historical lease classification. Mattel also elected the practical expedients to exclude right-of-use ("ROU") assets and lease liabilities for leases with an initial term of 12 months or less from the balance sheet, and to combine lease and non-lease components for property leases, which primarily relate to ancillary expenses such as common area maintenance charges and management fees.
Mattel determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception by assessing whether it conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Mattel's leases have remaining lease terms of up to 13 years, and often include one or more options to renew for up to 10 years. Renewal and termination options are included in the lease term when it is reasonably certain that Mattel will exercise the option.
In addition, certain of Mattel's lease agreements, primarily related to American Girl leases, include contingent rental payments based on a percentage of sales. Contingent rental expense is recorded in the period in which the contingent event becomes probable. During 2019, 2018, and 2017, contingent rental expense was not material, Mattel's lease agreements do not contain any material residual guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As substantially all of Mattel's leases do not provide an implicit rate, Mattel uses its incremental borrowing rate, based on the information available at the lease commencement date, to determine the present value of lease payments. Based on the present value of lease payments for Mattel's existing leases, Mattel recorded net losslease assets and lease liabilities of $101.5approximately $343 million primarily due to the weakeningand $390 million, respectively, upon adoption. The net lease assets were adjusted for deferred rent, lease incentives, and prepaid rent. Mattel had no material finance leases. The new lease standard did not materially impact Mattel's consolidated statements of operations and had no impact on Mattel's consolidated statements of cash flows.
The impact of the British pound sterling, Mexican peso,new lease standard on the December 31, 2019 consolidated balance sheet was as follows:
|
| | | |
| | December 31,
2019 |
| | (In thousands, except years and percentage information) |
| Right-of-use assets, net | $ | 303,187 |
|
| | |
| Accrued liabilities | $ | 74,065 |
|
| Noncurrent lease liabilities | 270,853 |
|
| Total lease liabilities | $ | 344,918 |
|
| | |
| Weighted average remaining lease term | 6.6 years |
|
| | |
| Weighted average discount rate | 7.9 | % |
Operating lease costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Total operating lease costs for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $142.1 million. Of the $142.1 million, $44 million relate to short-term and Euro against the U.S. dollar, partially offset by the strengthening of the Brazilian real against the U.S. dollar. For 2015, currency translation adjustments resultedvariable lease costs, which primarily relate to common area maintenance charges, management fees, taxes, and storage fees. Sublease rental income was $5.7 million in a net loss of $213.8 million, primarily due2019.
Supplemental information related to the weakening of the Euro, Brazilian real, Mexican peso, and British pound sterling against the U.S. dollar.leases was as follows:
|
| | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities | $ | 105,015 |
|
| Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities | $ | 38,795 |
|
The following table shows the future maturities of lease liabilities for leases in effect as of December 31, 2019:
|
| | | | |
| Years Ending December 31, | | Lease Liabilities |
| | | (In thousands) |
| 2020 | | $ | 96,611 |
|
| 2021 | | 84,345 |
|
| 2022 | | 63,885 |
|
| 2023 | | 46,726 |
|
| 2024 | | 32,709 |
|
| Thereafter | | 126,003 |
|
| | | 450,279 |
|
| Less: imputed interest | | (105,361 | ) |
| | | $ | 344,918 |
|
As of December 31, 2018, future minimum lease payments under long-term noncancelable lease as classified under ASC 840 were as follow:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Capital
Leases | | Operating
Leases |
| | (In thousands) |
| 2019 | $ | 294 |
| | $ | 110,794 |
|
| 2020 | 25 |
| | 83,566 |
|
| 2021 | — |
| | 72,606 |
|
| 2022 | — |
| | 59,191 |
|
| 2023 | — |
| | 56,123 |
|
| Thereafter | — |
| | 133,716 |
|
| | $ | 319 |
| (a) | $ | 515,996 |
|
| |
| (a) | Includes minimal imputed interest. |
Rental expense for operating leases under ASC 840 was $127.1 million and $137.4 million for 2018 and 2017, respectively, net of sublease income of $3.0 million and $2.9 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Note 7—8—Share-Based Payments
Mattel Stock Option Plans
In May 2015, Mattel’s stockholders approved the Mattel, Inc. Amended and Restated 2010 Equity and Long-Term Compensation Plan (the "Amended 2010 Plan"). The 2010 Equity and Long-Term Compensation Plan was approved by Mattel's stockholders in May 2010 (the "2010 Plan"). Upon approval of the 2010 Plan, Mattel terminated its 2005 Equity Compensation Plan (the "2005 Plan"), except with respect to grants then outstanding under the 2005 Plan. All restricted stock unit ("RSU") awards made under the 2005 Plan have vested as of December 31, 2015.vested. Outstanding stock option grants under the 2005 Plan that have not expired or have not been terminated continue to be exercisable under the terms of their respective grant agreements. In May 2015, Mattel’s stockholders approved the Amended 2010 Plan. The terms of the Amended 2010 Plan are substantially similar to the terms of the 2010 Plan and the 2005 Plan.
Under the Amended 2010 Plan, Mattel has the ability to grant nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, RSUs, dividend equivalent rights, performance awards, and shares of common stock to officers, employees, and other persons providing services to Mattel. Generally, options vest and become exercisable contingent upon the grantees’ continued employment or service with Mattel. Nonqualified stock options are granted at not less than 100% of the fair market value of Mattel’s common stock on the date of grant, expire no later than 10 years from the date of grant, and vest on a schedule determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, generally during a period of 3 years from the date of grant. In the event of a retirement of an employee aged 55 years or older with 5 or more years of service, or the death or disability of an employee, that occurs in each case at least 6 months after the grant date, nonqualified stock options become fully vested. Similar provisions exist for non-employee directors. Time-vesting RSUs granted under the Amended 2010 Plan generally vest over a period of 3 years from the date of grant. In the event of the involuntary termination of an employee aged 55 years or older with 5 or more years of service, or the death or disability of an employee, that occurs at least 6 months after the grant date, RSUs become fully vested. The Amended 2010 Plan also contains provisions regarding grants of equity compensation to the non-employee members of the Board of Directors. The Amended 2010 Plan expires on March 26, 2025, except as to any grants then outstanding.
The number of shares of common stock available for grant under the Amended 2010 Plan is subject to an aggregate limit of the sum of (i) 77104 million shares, (ii) the number of shares that remained available for issuance under the 2005 Plan on May 12, 2010, and (iii) any shares subject to awards outstanding under the 2005 Plan that on or after May 12, 2010 are forfeited or otherwise terminate or expire without the issuance of shares to the holder of the award. The Amended 2010 Plan is further subject to detailed share-counting rules. As a result of such share-counting rules, full-value grants such as grants of restricted stock or RSUs count against shares remaining available for grant at a higher rate than grants of stock options and stock appreciation rights. EachFor grants prior to March 1, 2019, each stock option or stock appreciation right grant is treated as using one available share for each share actually subject to such grant, whereas each restricted stock or RSU grant is treated as using three3 available shares for each share actually subject to such full-value grant. For grants on or after March 1, 2019, each stock option or stock appreciation right grant is treated as using one available share for each share actually subject to such grant, whereas each restricted stock or RSU grant is treated as using two and seven-tenths available shares for each share actually subject to such full-value grant. At December 31, 2017,2019, there were approximately 924 million shares of common stock available for grant remaining under the Amended 2010 Plan.
Mattel recognized total share-based compensation expense related to stock options and RSUs (including Performance RSUs) of $56.0 million, $48.9 million, and $67.1 million $54.0 million,during 2019, 2018, and $56.7 million during 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, which is included in other selling and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2017,2019, total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based payments totaled $105.5$81.4 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.11.9 years.
Stock Options
Mattel recognized compensation expense of $14.1$11.3 million, $10.5$8.4 million, and $15.2$14.1 million for stock options during 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015,2017, respectively, which is included within other selling and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. There was no current year income tax benefit related to stock options during 2019, 2018 or 2017 as future tax benefits related to stock options were fully offset by a valuation allowance. Income tax benefits related
In 2018, Mattel granted market-based options under the Amended 2010 Plan to stock option activitycertain senior executives in connection with its April 26, 2018—April 26, 2021 and May 31, 2018—May 31, 2021 performance cycles. These performance options are earned at the initial target number of options granted based on achievement of a certain threshold of Mattel’s total shareholder return ("TSR") for the three-year performance cycle relative to the TSR realized by companies comprising the S&P 500 as of the first day of the performance cycle. If this threshold is not met at the end of the three-year cycle, no shares are earned. For the performance options granted during 20162018 that remain outstanding at December 31, 2018, the range of possible outcomes is that between 0 and 2015 totaled $6.81.3 million and $5.5 million, respectively.
shares could be earned. The fair value of these performance options has been estimated at the grant dates using a Monte Carlo valuation methodology, and the weighted-average grant-date fair value of performance options granted hasduring 2018 was $4.21.
The fair values of all other options granted have been estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The expected life of the options used in this calculation is the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding and has been determined based on historical exercise experience. Expected stock price volatility is based on the historical volatility of Mattel’s stock for a period approximating the expected life, the expected dividend yield is based on Mattel’s most recent actual annual dividend payout, and the risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues approximating the expected life. The weighted average grant dateweighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during 2019, 2018, and 2017 2016,was $5.09, $5.46, and 2015 was $3.37 $4.09, and $1.97, respectively.
The following weighted averageweighted-average assumptions were used in determining the fair value of options granted:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Expected life (in years) | 5.5 |
| | 5.1 |
| | 5.0 |
|
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.7 | % | | 2.8 | % | | 1.8 | % |
| Volatility factor | 38.1 | % | | 33.6 | % | | 27.2 | % |
| Dividend yield | — | % | | — | % | | 4.0 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Expected life (in years) | 5.0 |
| | 5.0 |
| | 4.9 |
|
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.8 | % | | 1.1 | % | | 1.5 | % |
| Volatility factor | 27.2 | % | | 25.3 | % | | 23.1 | % |
| Dividend yield | 4.0 | % | | 4.7 | % | | 6.5 | % |
The following is a summary of stock option information and weighted averageweighted-average exercise prices for Mattel’s stock options:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | Shares | | Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price | | Shares | | Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price | | Shares | | Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price |
| | (In thousands, except weighted-average exercise price) |
| Outstanding at January 1 | 22,020 |
| | $ | 25.47 |
| | 25,233 |
| | $ | 26.56 |
| | 19,316 |
| | $ | 28.71 |
|
| Granted | 2,342 |
| | 13.54 |
| | 3,379 |
| | 15.41 |
| | 7,776 |
| | 21.05 |
|
| Exercised | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (84 | ) | | 21.22 |
|
| Forfeited | (266 | ) | | 17.64 |
| | (4,209 | ) | | 23.06 |
| | (832 | ) | | 25.84 |
|
| Canceled | (1,586 | ) | | 26.79 |
| | (2,383 | ) | | 26.99 |
| | (943 | ) | | 26.31 |
|
| Outstanding at December 31 | 22,510 |
| | $ | 24.22 |
| | 22,020 |
| | $ | 25.47 |
| | 25,233 |
| | $ | 26.56 |
|
| Exercisable at December 31 | 16,576 |
| | $ | 27.32 |
| | 16,051 |
| | $ | 28.10 |
| | 14,038 |
| | $ | 29.08 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price |
| | (In thousands, except weighted average exercise price) |
| Outstanding at January 1 | 19,316 |
| | $ | 28.71 |
| | 17,900 |
| | $ | 27.39 |
| | 10,523 |
| | $ | 30.77 |
|
| Granted | 7,776 |
| | 21.05 |
| | 3,498 |
| | 32.67 |
| | 9,112 |
| | 23.37 |
|
| Exercised | (84 | ) | | 21.22 |
| | (1,539 | ) | | 22.13 |
| | (764 | ) | | 19.63 |
|
| Forfeited | (832 | ) | | 25.84 |
| | (388 | ) | | 26.77 |
| | (717 | ) | | 31.34 |
|
| Expired | (943 | ) | | 26.31 |
| | (155 | ) | | 36.87 |
| | (254 | ) | | 35.07 |
|
| Outstanding at December 31 | 25,233 |
| | $ | 26.56 |
| | 19,316 |
| | $ | 28.71 |
| | 17,900 |
| | $ | 27.39 |
|
| Exercisable at December 31 | 14,038 |
| | $ | 29.08 |
| | 9,851 |
| | $ | 29.83 |
| | 7,498 |
| | $ | 30.09 |
|
The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the current market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of anthe option. There were no stock option exercises during 2019 and 2018. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2017 2016, and 2015 was $0.5 million, $15.8 million, and $4.9 million, respectively.million. At December 31, 2017,2019, options outstanding and options exercisable had no0 intrinsic value, with a weighted averageweighted-average remaining life of 7.4 years. At December 31, 2017, options exercisable had no intrinsic value, with a weighted average remaining life of 6.2 years. At December 31, 2017, stock options vested or expected to vest totaled 24.8 million shares, with no intrinsic value, weighted average exercise price of $26.62,5.2 years and weighted average remaining life of 7.4 years. During 2017, approximately 5 million stock options vested. The total grant date fair value of stock options vested during 2017, 2016, and 2015 was approximately $14 million, $13 million, and $12 million,4.0 years, respectively.
Mattel uses treasury shares purchased under its share repurchase program to satisfy stock option exercises. Cash received from stock options exercised during 2017 2016, and 2015 was $1.8 million.
At December 31, 2019, stock options vested or expected to vest totaled 21.8 million $34.1shares, with an intrinsic value of $0.2 million, weighted-average exercise price of $24.52, and weighted-average remaining life of 5.1 years. During 2019, approximately 2 million stock options vested. The total grant-date fair value of stock options vested during 2019, 2018, and 2017 was approximately $8 million, $12 million, and $15.0$14 million, respectively.
Restricted Stock Units
RSUs are valued at the market value on the date of grant, adjusted by the present value of the expected dividends for RSUs that are not entitled to a dividend during the vest period. The expense for RSUs is evenly attributed to the periods in which the restrictions lapse, which is generally 3 years from the date of grant.
Compensation expense recognized related to grants of RSUs, excluding Performance RSUs, was $33.6 million, $37.5 million, and $55.2 million $40.2 million,in 2019, 2018, and $41.5 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, and iswas included within other selling and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. CurrentThere was no current year income tax expensebenefit related to RSUs was $4.2 million during 2019, 2018, and 2017 andas future tax benefits related to RSUsstock options were fully offset by a valuation allowance. Income tax benefits related to RSU activity during 2016 and 2015 totaled $11.5 million and $11.0 million, respectively.
The following is a summary of RSU information and weighted average grant dateweighted-average grant-date fair values for Mattel’s RSUs, excluding Performance RSUs:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | Shares | | Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value | | Shares | | Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value | | Shares | | Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value |
| | (In thousands, except weighted-average grant-date fair value) |
| Unvested at January 1 | 4,721 |
| | $ | 17.22 |
| | 4,898 |
| | $ | 21.95 |
| | 3,243 |
| | $ | 28.85 |
|
| Granted | 1,687 |
| | 13.28 |
| | 3,345 |
| | 15.71 |
| | 4,205 |
| | 19.39 |
|
| Vested | (1,997 | ) | | 18.02 |
| | (2,048 | ) | | 21.02 |
| | (2,103 | ) | | 27.13 |
|
| Forfeited | (547 | ) | | 16.48 |
| | (1,474 | ) | | 20.18 |
| | (447 | ) | | 23.57 |
|
| Unvested at December 31 | 3,864 |
| | $ | 15.19 |
| | 4,721 |
| | $ | 17.22 |
| | 4,898 |
| | $ | 21.95 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | | Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | | Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
| | (In thousands, except weighted average grant date fair value) |
| Unvested at January 1 | 3,243 |
| | $ | 28.85 |
| | 3,738 |
| | $ | 28.98 |
| | 3,173 |
| | $ | 37.10 |
|
| Granted | 4,205 |
| | 19.39 |
| | 1,608 |
| | 29.68 |
| | 2,332 |
| | 23.54 |
|
| Vested | (2,103 | ) | | 27.13 |
| | (1,756 | ) | | 30.25 |
| | (1,159 | ) | | 37.29 |
|
| Forfeited | (447 | ) | | 23.57 |
| | (347 | ) | | 27.04 |
| | (608 | ) | | 34.67 |
|
| Unvested at December 31 | 4,898 |
| | $ | 21.95 |
| | 3,243 |
| | $ | 28.85 |
| | 3,738 |
| | $ | 28.98 |
|
At December 31, 2017,2019, RSUs expected to vest totaled 4.63.4 million shares, with a weighted average grant dateweighted-average grant-date fair value of $20.80.$15.25. The total grant dategrant-date fair value of RSUs vested during 2019, 2018, and 2017 2016, and 2015 was $57.0$36.0 million, $53.1$43.2 million, and $43.2$57.0 million, respectively.
In addition to the expense and share amounts described above, Mattel recognized amounts$11.0 million, $3.0 million, and $0.6 million during 2019, 2018, and 2017, and 2016respectively, for Performance RSUs granted in connection with its January 1, 2019—December 31, 2021, January 1, 2018—December 31, 2020, and January 1, 2017—December 31, 2019 LTIP and January 1, 2016—December 31, 2018 LTIP performance cycle,cycles, more fully described in "Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Employee Benefit Plans." During 2019, 2018, and 2017, there was no current year income tax benefit andfor Performance RSUs granted in connection with any of the performance cycles referenced above, as future tax benefits were fully offset by a valuation allowance for Performance RSUs granted in connection with its January 1, 2017—December 31, 2019 LTIP and January 1, 2016—December 31, 2018 LTIP performance cycles. During 2016, income tax benefits totaled $1.2 million for Performance RSUs granted in connection with its January 1, 2016—December 31, 2018 LTIP performance cycle. No compensation expense and no related income tax benefit was recognized for Performance RSUs granted in connection with its January 1, 2014—December 31, 2016 LTIP performance cycle, also more fully described in "Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Employee Benefit Plans," for the years ended 2017, 2016, and 2015 as actual results did not meet minimum performance thresholds.allowance.
Note 8—9—Earnings Per Share
Unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and are included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. CertainPrior to June 30, 2018, certain of Mattel’s RSUs arewere considered participating securities because they containcontained nonforfeitable rights to dividend equivalents.
Under the two-class method, net income is reduced by the amount of dividends declared in the period for each class of common stock and participating securities. The remaining undistributed earnings are then allocated to common stock and participating securities as if all of the net income for the period had been distributed. Basic earnings per common share excludes dilution and is calculated by dividing net income allocable to common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income allocable to common shares by the weighted average number of common shares for the period, as adjusted for the potential dilutive effect of non-participating share-based awards.
The following table reconciles earnings per common share:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| | (In thousands, except per share amounts) |
| Basic: | | | | | |
| Net loss | $ | (213,512 | ) | | $ | (533,299 | ) | | $ | (1,054,579 | ) |
| Less: Net loss allocable to participating RSUs (a) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Net loss available for basic common shares | $ | (213,512 | ) | | $ | (533,299 | ) | | $ | (1,054,579 | ) |
| Weighted average common shares outstanding | 346,127 |
| | 345,012 |
| | 343,564 |
|
| Basic net loss per common share | $ | (0.62 | ) | | $ | (1.55 | ) | | $ | (3.07 | ) |
| Diluted: | | | | | |
| Net loss | $ | (213,512 | ) | | $ | (533,299 | ) | | $ | (1,054,579 | ) |
| Less: Net loss allocable to participating RSUs (a) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Net loss available for diluted common shares | $ | (213,512 | ) | | $ | (533,299 | ) | | $ | (1,054,579 | ) |
| Weighted average common shares outstanding | 346,127 |
| | 345,012 |
| | 343,564 |
|
| Weighted average common equivalent shares arising from: | | | | | |
| Dilutive stock options and non-participating RSUs (b) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Weighted average number of common and potential common shares | 346,127 |
| | 345,012 |
| | 343,564 |
|
| Diluted net loss per common share | $ | (0.62 | ) | | $ | (1.55 | ) | | $ | (3.07 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 |
| | (In thousands, except per share amounts) |
| Basic: | | | | | |
| Net (loss) income | $ | (1,053,836 | ) | | $ | 318,022 |
| | $ | 369,416 |
|
| Less: Net income allocable to participating RSUs (a) | — |
| | (1,377 | ) | | (3,179 | ) |
| Net (loss) income available for basic common shares | $ | (1,053,836 | ) | | $ | 316,645 |
| | $ | 366,237 |
|
| Weighted average common shares outstanding | 343,564 |
| | 341,480 |
| | 339,172 |
|
| Basic net (loss) income per common share | $ | (3.07 | ) | | $ | 0.93 |
| | $ | 1.08 |
|
| Diluted: | | | | | |
| Net (loss) income | $ | (1,053,836 | ) | | $ | 318,022 |
| | $ | 369,416 |
|
| Less: Net income allocable to participating RSUs (a) | — |
| | (1,377 | ) | | (3,179 | ) |
| Net (loss) income available for diluted common shares | $ | (1,053,836 | ) | | $ | 316,645 |
| | $ | 366,237 |
|
| Weighted average common shares outstanding | 343,564 |
| | 341,480 |
| | 339,172 |
|
| Weighted average common equivalent shares arising from: | | | | | |
| Dilutive stock options and non-participating RSUs | — |
| | 2,753 |
| | 576 |
|
| Weighted average number of common and potential common shares | 343,564 |
| | 344,233 |
| | 339,748 |
|
| Diluted net (loss) income per common share | $ | (3.07 | ) | | $ | 0.92 |
| | $ | 1.08 |
|
(a) During 2017, Mattel did not allocate its net loss to its participating RSUs as its participating RSUs are not obligated to share in Mattel's losses.
The calculation of potential common shares assumes the exercise of dilutive stock options and vesting of non-participating RSUs, net of assumed treasury share repurchases at average market prices. Mattel was in a net loss position in 2017 and, accordingly, all outstanding nonqualified stock options and non-participating RSUs were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share because their effect would be antidilutive. Nonqualified stock options and non-participating RSUs totaling 8.5 million shares and 9.6 million shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share for 2016 and 2015, respectively, because they were antidilutive.
| |
| (a) | Mattel did not have participating RSUs for the year ended December 31, 2019. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, Mattel did not allocate its net loss to its participating RSUs as its participating RSUs are not obligated to share in the losses of the Company. |
| |
| (b) | Mattel was in a net loss position for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, and, accordingly, all outstanding nonqualified stock options and non-participating RSUs were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share because their effect would be antidilutive. |
Note 9—10—Derivative Instruments
Mattel seeks to mitigate its exposure to foreign currency transaction risk by monitoring its foreign currency transaction exposure for the year and partially hedging such exposure using foreign currency forward exchange contracts. Mattel uses foreign currency forward exchange contracts as cash flow hedges primarily to hedge its purchases and sales of inventory denominated in foreign currencies. These contracts generally have maturity dates of up to 18 months. These derivative instruments have been designated as effective cash flow hedges, whereby the unsettled hedges are reported in Mattel’s consolidated balance sheets at fair value, with changes in the fair value of the hedges reflected in other comprehensive income ("OCI"). Realized gains and losses for these contracts are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations in the period in which the inventory is sold to customers. Additionally, Mattel uses foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge intercompany loans and advances denominated in foreign currencies. Due to the short-term nature of the contracts involved, Mattel does not use hedge accounting for these contracts, and as such, changes in fair value are recorded in the period of change in the consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, Mattel held foreign currency forward exchange contracts with notional amounts of $987.7$742.0 million and $1.20 billion,$962.1 million, respectively.
The following table presents Mattel’s derivative assets and liabilities:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Derivative Assets |
| | Balance Sheet Classification | | Fair Value |
| | | | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| | | | (In thousands) |
| Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | |
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Prepaid expenses and other
current assets | | $ | 10,227 |
| | $ | 12,122 |
|
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Other noncurrent assets | | 715 |
| | 1,613 |
|
| | | | $ | 10,942 |
| | $ | 13,735 |
|
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | |
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Prepaid expenses and other
current assets | | $ | 4,060 |
| | $ | 2,357 |
|
| | | | $ | 15,002 |
| | $ | 16,092 |
|
| | | | | | |
| | Derivative Liabilities |
| | Balance Sheet Classification | | Fair Value |
| | | | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| | | | (In thousands) |
| Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | |
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Accrued liabilities | | $ | 2,500 |
| | $ | 954 |
|
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Other noncurrent liabilities | | 213 |
| | 185 |
|
| | | | $ | 2,713 |
| | $ | 1,139 |
|
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | |
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Accrued liabilities | | $ | 263 |
| | $ | 1,771 |
|
| | | | $ | 2,976 |
| | $ | 2,910 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Derivative Assets |
| | Balance Sheet Classification | | Fair Value |
| | | | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| | | | (In thousands) |
| Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | |
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | $ | 2,175 |
| | $ | 18,747 |
|
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Other noncurrent assets | | 115 |
| | 5,782 |
|
| Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments | | | $ | 2,290 |
| | $ | 24,529 |
|
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | |
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | $ | 5,514 |
| | $ | 2,678 |
|
| Total | | | $ | 7,804 |
| | $ | 27,207 |
|
| | | | | | |
| | Derivative Liabilities |
| | Balance Sheet Classification | | Fair Value |
| | | | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| | | | (In thousands) |
| Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | |
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Accrued liabilities | | $ | 15,970 |
| | $ | 1,917 |
|
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Other noncurrent liabilities | | 3,159 |
| | 223 |
|
| Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments | | | $ | 19,129 |
| | $ | 2,140 |
|
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | |
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Accrued liabilities | | $ | 191 |
| | $ | 7,072 |
|
| Total | | | $ | 19,320 |
| | $ | 9,212 |
|
The following tables present the classification and amount of gains and losses, net of tax, from derivatives reported in the consolidated statements of operations:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Derivatives Designated As Hedging Instruments | | Consolidated Statements of Operations Classification |
| | For the Year Ended | |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 | |
| | (In thousands) | | |
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts: | | | | | | | |
| Amount of gains (losses) recognized in OCI | $ | 17,024 |
| | $ | 24,082 |
| | $ | (55,377 | ) | | |
| Amount of gains (losses) reclassified from accumulated OCI to the consolidated statements of operations | 17,394 |
| | (8,427 | ) | | (16,810 | ) | | Cost of sales |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Derivatives Designated As Hedging Instruments | | Consolidated Statements of Operations Classification |
| | For the Year Ended | |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 | |
| | (In thousands) | | |
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts: | | | | | | | |
| Amount of (loss) gain recognized in OCI | $ | (55,377 | ) | | $ | 18,733 |
| | $ | 37,926 |
| | |
| Amount of (loss) gain reclassified from accumulated OCI to the consolidated statements of operations | (16,810 | ) | | 16,627 |
| | 52,588 |
| | Cost of sales |
The net gains (losses) gains of $(16.8)$17.4 million, $16.6$(8.4) million, and $52.6$(16.8) million reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to the consolidated statements of operations during 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015,2017, respectively, are offset by the changes in cash flows associated with the underlying hedged transactions.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Derivatives Not Designated As Hedging Instruments | | Consolidated Statements of Operations Classification |
| | For the Year Ended | |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 | |
| | (In thousands) | | |
| Amount of gain (loss) recognized in the consolidated statements of operations: | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | $ | 2,530 |
| | $ | (23,109 | ) | | $ | 70,200 |
| | Other non-operating expense, net |
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | — |
| | (244 | ) | | 511 |
| | Cost of sales |
| | $ | 2,530 |
| | $ | (23,353 | ) | | $ | 70,711 |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Derivatives Not Designated As Hedging Instruments | | Consolidated Statements of Operations Classification |
| | For the Year Ended | |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 | |
| | (In thousands) | | |
| Amount of gain (loss) recognized in the statements of operations: | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | $ | 70,200 |
| | $ | (11,056 | ) | | $ | (51,679 | ) | | Other non-operating expense/income, net |
| Cross currency swap contract | — |
| | — |
| | 5,288 |
| | Other non-operating expense/income, net |
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | 511 |
| | 1,631 |
| | (265 | ) | | Cost of sales |
| Total | $ | 70,711 |
| | $ | (9,425 | ) | | $ | (46,656 | ) | | |
The net gains (losses) of $70.7$2.5 million, $(9.4)$(23.4) million, and $(46.7)$70.7 million recognized in the consolidated statements of operations during 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015,2017, respectively, are offset by foreign currency transaction gains and losses on the related hedged balances.
Note 10—11—Fair Value Measurements
The following table presents information about Mattel’s assets and liabilities measured and reported in the financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized to determine such fair value. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1 – Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access.
Level 2 – Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 – Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable, supported by little or no market activity, and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
Mattel’s financial assets and liabilities include the following:
| | | | December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2019 |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| | (In thousands) | (In thousands) |
| Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (a) | $ | — |
| | $ | 7,804 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 7,804 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 15,002 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 15,002 |
|
| Available-for-sale security (b) | 8,991 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,991 |
| |
| | $ | 8,991 |
| | $ | 7,804 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 16,795 |
| |
| Available-for-sale (b) | | 3,530 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,530 |
|
| Total assets | | $ | 3,530 |
| | $ | 15,002 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 18,532 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (a) | $ | — |
| | $ | 19,320 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 19,320 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 2,976 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,976 |
|
| | | | December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2018 |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| | (In thousands) | (In thousands) |
| Assets: | | | | �� | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (a) | $ | — |
| | $ | 27,207 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 27,207 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 16,092 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 16,092 |
|
| Available-for-sale security (b) | 14,939 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 14,939 |
| |
| | $ | 14,939 |
| | $ | 27,207 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 42,146 |
| |
| Available-for-sale (b) | | 5,243 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,243 |
|
| Total assets | | $ | 5,243 |
| | $ | 16,092 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 21,335 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency forward exchange contracts (a) | $ | — |
| | $ | 9,212 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 9,212 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 2,910 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,910 |
|
| |
| (a) | The fair value of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts is based on dealer quotes of market forward rates and reflects the amount that Mattel would receive or pay at their maturity dates for contracts involving the same notional amounts, currencies, and maturity dates. |
| |
| (b) | The fair value of the available-for-sale security is based on the quoted price on an active public exchange. |
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Mattel tests its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable or that the carrying value may exceed its fair value. During 2016,the year ended December 31, 2019, Mattel did not have any assets or liabilities measured and reported at fair value on a non-recurring basis in periods subsequent to initial recognition.
During 2017, Mattel recorded impairment charges associated with its intangible assets andimpaired certain property, plant, and equipment.
As described in "Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Goodwill and Other Intangibles," during the third quarterequipment totaling $38.7 million, of 2017, Mattel discontinued the use of a trademark which resulted in an impairment charge of $9.2 million.
As described in "Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Property, Plant, and Equipment," during the third and fourth quarter of 2017, Mattel recorded impairment charges of $21.2$25.9 million related to leasehold improvements withinthe impairment of certain American Girl retail stores.store assets. The fair value of the asset group American Girl retail stores was determined based on the income approach, with inputs which are categorized as Level 3 on the fair value hierarchy,inputs utilizing certain market participant assumptions. These inputs includeincluded revenue andforecasts, profit forecasts, and the discount rate. Further, Mattel recorded anThe other impairment charge incharges of $12.8 million was primarily related to the fourth quarterfull impairment of 2017 of $20.6 million for capitalized costs related tocertain tools, dies, and molds forand machinery equipment due to discontinued products which were no longer considereduse. Subsequent to be recoverable. Therethese impairment charges, the remaining value attributed to the impaired assets was immaterial as of December 31, 2019.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, Mattel fully impaired certain intangible assets and property, plant, and equipment of $18.2 million due to discontinued use. Subsequent to these impairment charges, there was no remaining value attributed to the identified tools, dies, and molds subsequent to the impairment charge.these assets as of December 31, 2018.
Other Financial Instruments
Mattel’s financial instruments include cash and equivalents, accounts receivable and payable, accrued liabilities, short-term borrowings, and accrued liabilities.long-term debt. The fair values of these instruments, excluding long-term debt, approximate their carrying values because of their short-term nature. Cash isand equivalents are classified as Level 1 and all other financial instruments are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
The estimated fair value of Mattel’s long-term debt including the current portion, was $3.01$3.00 billion (compared to a carrying value of $3.15$2.90 billion) as of December 31, 20172019 and $2.18$2.49 billion (compared to a carrying value of $2.15$2.90 billion) as of December 31, 2016.2018. The estimated fair values have been calculated based on broker quotes or rates for the same or similar instruments and are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
Note 11—12—Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
Mattel routinely enters into noncancelable lease agreements for premisesLicensing and equipment used in the normal course of business. Certain of these leases include escalation clauses that adjust rental expense to reflect changes in price indices, as well as renewal options. In addition to minimum rental payments, certain of Mattel’s leases require additional payments to reimburse the lessors for operating expenses such as real estate taxes, maintenance, utilities,Similar Agreements and insurance. Rental expense is recorded on a straight-line basis, including escalating minimum payments. The American Girl Place leases in Chicago, Illinois, Los Angeles, California, and New York, New York, and American Girl store leases in Alpharetta, Georgia, Bloomington, Minnesota, Charlotte, North Carolina, Chesterfield, Missouri, Columbus, Ohio, Dallas, Texas, Houston, Texas, Lone Tree, Colorado, Lynnwood, Washington, McLean, Virginia, Miami, Florida, Nashville, Tennessee, Natick, Massachusetts, Orlando, Florida, Overland Park, Kansas, Palo Alto, California, and Scottsdale, Arizona also contain provisions for additional rental payments based on a percentage of the sales of each store after reaching certain sales benchmarks. Contingent rental expense is recorded in the period in which the contingent event becomes probable. During 2017, 2016, and 2015, contingent rental expense was not material.
The following table shows the future minimum obligations under lease commitments in effect at December 31, 2017:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Capital Leases | | Operating Leases |
| | (In thousands) |
| 2018 | $ | 294 |
| | $ | 111,645 |
|
| 2019 | 294 |
| | 92,608 |
|
| 2020 | 25 |
| | 75,737 |
|
| 2021 | — |
| | 65,021 |
|
| 2022 | — |
| | 56,412 |
|
| Thereafter | — |
| | 179,220 |
|
| | $ | 613 |
| (a) | $ | 580,643 |
|
| |
(a) | Includes $0.1 million of imputed interest. |
Rental expense under operating leases amounted to $137.4 million, $110.1 million, and $114.9 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, net of sublease income of $2.9 million, $2.7 million, and $2.7 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
CommitmentsOther Purchasing Obligations
In the normal course of business, Mattel enters into contractual arrangements to obtain and protect Mattel’s right to create and market certain products and for future purchases of goods and services to ensure availability and timely delivery. Suchproducts. These arrangements include royalty payments pursuant to licensing agreements and commitments primarily for future inventory purchases. Certain of these commitmentsthat routinely contain provisions for guarantees or minimum expenditures during the term of the contracts.contract. Mattel also enters into contractual arrangements for commitments of future purchases of goods and services to ensure availability and timely delivery. Current and future commitments for guaranteed payments reflect Mattel’s focus on expanding its product lines through alliances with businesses in other industries.
Licensing and similar agreements in effect at December 31, 20172019 contain provisions for future minimum payments as shown in the following table:
|
| | | |
| | Licensing and
Similar
Agreements |
| | (In thousands) |
| 2020 | $ | 85,376 |
|
| 2021 | 53,653 |
|
| 2022 | 42,949 |
|
| 2023 | 1,506 |
|
| 2024 | 826 |
|
| Thereafter | — |
|
| | $ | 184,310 |
|
|
| | | |
| | Licensing and Similar Agreements |
| | (In thousands) |
| 2018 | $ | 80,624 |
|
| 2019 | 122,651 |
|
| 2020 | 84,051 |
|
| 2021 | 29,746 |
|
| 2022 | 4,451 |
|
| Thereafter | — |
|
| | $ | 321,523 |
|
Royalty expense for 2019, 2018, and 2017 2016, and 2015 was $244.5$220.2 million, $228.9$224.0 million, and $264.6$244.5 million, respectively.
The following table shows the future minimum obligations for purchases of inventory, services, and other items as of December 31, 2017:2019:
|
| | | |
| | Other
Purchase
Obligations |
| | (In thousands) |
| 2020 | $ | 249,567 |
|
| 2021 | 54,397 |
|
| 2022 | 37,943 |
|
| 2023 | — |
|
| 2024 | — |
|
| Thereafter | — |
|
| | $ | 341,907 |
|
|
| | | |
| | Other Purchase Obligations |
| | (In thousands) |
| 2018 | $ | 307,889 |
|
| 2019 | 35,207 |
|
| 2020 | 13,444 |
|
| 2021 | 2,305 |
|
| 2022 | — |
|
| | $ | 358,845 |
|
Insurance
Mattel has a wholly-owned subsidiary, Far West Insurance Company, Ltd. ("Far West"), that was established to insure Mattel’s workers’ compensation, general, automobile, product liability, and property risks. For the year ended December 31, 2019, Far West insuresinsured the first $1.0 million per occurrence for workers’ compensation risks, the first $0.5 million for general and automobile liability risks, the first $2.0 million per occurrence and $2.0 million per year for product liability risks, and up to $1.0 million per occurrence for property risks. Various insurance companies that have an "A" or better AM Best rating at the time the policies are purchased reinsurereinsured Mattel’s risk in excess of the amounts insured by Far West. Mattel’s liability for reported and incurred but not reported workers' compensation, general, automobile, product liability, and property claims at December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 totaled $12.9$12.0 million and $15.5$12.3 million, respectively, and is primarily included in other noncurrent liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. Loss reserves are accrued based on Mattel’s estimate of the aggregate liability for claims incurred.
Litigation
Litigation Related to Carter Bryant and MGA Entertainment, Inc.
In April 2004, Mattel filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court against Carter Bryant ("Bryant"), a former Mattel design employee. The suit alleges that Bryant aided and assisted a Mattel competitor, MGA Entertainment, Inc. ("MGA"), during the time he was employed by Mattel, in violation of his contractual and other duties to Mattel. In September 2004, Bryant asserted counterclaims against Mattel, including counterclaims in which Bryant sought, as a putative class action representative, to invalidate Mattel’s Confidential Information and Proprietary Inventions Agreements with its employees. Bryant also removed Mattel’sMattel's suit to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. In December 2004, MGA intervened as a party-defendant in Mattel’sMattel's action against Bryant, asserting that its rights to Bratz properties are at stake in the litigation.
Separately, in November 2004, Bryant filed an action against Mattel in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The action sought a judicial declaration that Bryant’sBryant's purported conveyance of rights in Bratz was proper and that he did not misappropriate Mattel property in creating Bratz.
In April 2005, MGA filed suit against Mattel in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. MGA’sMGA's action alleges claims of trade dress infringement, trade dress dilution, false designation of origin, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment. The suit alleges, among other things, that certain products, themes, packaging, and/or television commercials in various Mattel product lines have infringed upon products, themes, packaging, and/or television commercials for various MGA product lines, including Bratz. The complaint also asserts that various alleged Mattel acts with respect to unidentified retailers, distributors, and licensees have damaged MGA and that various alleged acts by industry organizations, purportedly induced by Mattel, have damaged MGA. MGA’sMGA's suit alleges that MGA has been damaged in an amount "believed to reach or exceed tens of millions of dollars" and further seeks punitive damages, disgorgement of Mattel’s profits and injunctive relief.
In June 2006, the three3 cases were consolidated in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. On July 17, 2006, the Court issued an order dismissing all claims that Bryant had asserted against Mattel, including Bryant’sBryant's purported counterclaims to invalidate Mattel’sMattel's Confidential Information and Proprietary Inventions Agreements with its employees, and Bryant’sBryant's claims for declaratory relief.
On January 12, 2007, Mattel filed an Amended Complaint setting forth counterclaims that included additional claims against Bryant as well as claims for copyright infringement, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ("RICO") violations, misappropriation of trade secrets, intentional interference with contract, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty and breach of duty of loyalty, and unfair competition, among others, against MGA, its Chief Executive Officer Isaac Larian, certain MGA affiliates and an MGA employee. The RICO claim alleged that MGA stole Bratz and then, by recruiting and hiring key Mattel employees and directing them to bring with them Mattel confidential and proprietary information, unfairly competed against Mattel using Mattel’sMattel's trade secrets, confidential information, and key employees to build their business.
Mattel sought to try all of its claims in a single trial, but in February 2007, the Court decided that the consolidated cases would be tried in two phases, with the first trial to determine claims and defenses related to Mattel’sMattel's ownership of Bratz works and whether MGA infringed those works. On May 19, 2008, Bryant reached a settlement agreement with Mattel and is no longer a defendant in the litigation. In the public stipulation entered by Mattel and Bryant in connection with the resolution, Bryant agreed that he was and would continue to be bound by all prior and future Court Orders relating to Bratz ownership and infringement, including the Court’sCourt's summary judgment rulings.
The first phase of the first trial resulted in a unanimous jury verdict on July 17, 2008 in favor of Mattel. The jury found that almost all of the Bratz design drawings and other works in question were created by Bryant while he was employed at Mattel; that MGA and Isaac Larian intentionally interfered with the contractual duties owed by Bryant to Mattel, aided and abetted Bryant’sBryant's breaches of his duty of loyalty to Mattel, aided and abetted Bryant’s breaches of the fiduciary duties he owed to Mattel, and converted Mattel property for their own use. The same jury determined that defendants MGA, Larian, and MGA Entertainment (HK) Limited infringed Mattel’sMattel's copyrights in the Bratz design drawings and other Bratz works, and awarded Mattel total damages of approximately $100 million against the defendants. On December 3, 2008, the Court issued a series of orders rejecting MGA’sMGA's equitable defenses and granting Mattel’s motions for equitable relief, including an order enjoining the MGA party defendants from manufacturing, marketing, or selling certain Bratz fashion dolls or from using the "Bratz" name. The Court stayed its December 3, 2008 injunctive orders until further order of the Court.
The parties filed and argued additional motions for post-trial relief, including a request by MGA to enter judgment as a matter of law on Mattel’sMattel's claims in MGA’sMGA's favor and to reduce the jury’s damages award to Mattel. Mattel additionally moved for the appointment of a receiver. On April 27, 2009, the Court entered an order confirming that Bratz works found by the jury to have been created by Bryant during his Mattel employment were Mattel’sMattel's property and that hundreds of Bratz female fashion dolls infringe Mattel’s copyrights. The Court also upheld the jury’sjury's award of damages in the amount of $100 million and ordered an accounting of post-trial Bratz sales. The Court further vacated the stay of the December 3, 2008 orders.
MGA appealed the Court’sCourt's equitable orders to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On December 9, 2009, the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument on MGA’s appeal and issued an order staying the District Court’s equitable orders pending a further order to be issued by the Ninth Circuit. On July 22, 2010, the Ninth Circuit vacated the District Court’s equitable orders. The Ninth Circuit stated that, because of several jury instruction errors it identified, a significant portion—if not all—of the jury verdict and damage award should be vacated.
In its opinion, the Ninth Circuit found that the District Court erred in concluding that Mattel’sMattel's Invention Agreement unambiguously applied to "ideas;" that it should have considered extrinsic evidence in determining the application of the agreement; and if the conclusion turns on conflicting evidence, it should have been up to the jury to decide. The Ninth Circuit also concluded that the District Judge erred in transferring the entire brand to Mattel based on misappropriated names and that the Court should have submitted to the jury, rather than deciding itself, whether Bryant’sBryant's agreement assigned works created outside the scope of his employment and whether Bryant’sBryant's creation of the Bratz designs and sculpt was outside of his employment. The Court then went on to address copyright issues which would be raised after a retrial, since Mattel "might well convince a properly instructed jury" that it owns Bryant’s designs and sculpt. The Ninth Circuit stated that the sculpt itself was entitled only to "thin" copyright protection against virtually identical works, while the Bratz sketches were entitled to "broad" protection against substantially similar works; in applying the broad protection, however, the Ninth Circuit found that the lower court had erred in failing to filter out all of the unprotectable elements of Bryant’sBryant's sketches. This mistake, the Court said, caused the lower court to conclude that all Bratz dolls were substantially similar to Bryant’sBryant's original sketches.
Judge Stephen Larson, who presided over the first trial, retired from the bench during the course of the appeal, and the case was transferred to Judge David O. Carter. After the transfer, Judge Carter granted Mattel leave to file a Fourth Amended Answer and Counterclaims which focused on RICO, trade secret and other claims, and added additional parties, and subsequently granted in part and denied in part a defense motion to dismiss those counterclaims.
Later, on August 16, 2010, MGA asserted several new claims against Mattel in response to Mattel’sMattel's Fourth Amended Answer and Counterclaims, including claims for alleged trade secret misappropriation, an alleged violation of RICO, and wrongful injunction. MGA alleged, in summary, that, for more than a decade dating back to 1992, Mattel employees engaged in a pattern of stealing alleged trade secret information from competitors "toy fair" showrooms, and then sought to conceal that alleged misconduct. Mattel moved to strike and/or dismiss these claims, as well as certain MGA allegations regarding Mattel’s motives for filing suit. The Court granted that motion as to the wrongful injunction claim, which it dismissed with prejudice, and as to the allegations about Mattel’sMattel's motives, which it struck. The Court denied the motion as to MGA’sMGA's trade secret misappropriation claim and its claim for violations of RICO.
The Court resolved summary judgment motions in late 2010. Among other rulings, the Court dismissed both parties’parties' RICO claims; dismissed Mattel’sMattel's claim for breach of fiduciary duty and portions of other claims as "preempted" by the trade secrets act; dismissed MGA’sMGA's trade dress infringement claims; dismissed MGA’sMGA's unjust enrichment claim; dismissed MGA’sMGA's common law unfair competition claim; and dismissed portions of Mattel’s copyright infringement claim as to "later generation" Bratz dolls.
Trial of all remaining claims began in early January 2011. During the trial, and before the case was submitted to the jury, the Court granted MGA’sMGA's motions for judgment as to Mattel’s claims for aiding and abetting breach of duty of loyalty and conversion. The Court also granted a defense motion for judgment on portions of Mattel’s claim for misappropriation of trade secrets relating to thefts by former Mattel employees located in Mexico.
The jury reached verdicts on the remaining claims in April 2011. In those verdicts, the jury ruled against Mattel on its claims for ownership of Bratz-related works, for copyright infringement, and for misappropriation of trade secrets. The jury ruled for MGA on its claim of trade secret misappropriation as to 26 of its claimed trade secrets and awarded $88.5 million in damages. The jury ruled against MGA as to 88 of its claimed trade secrets. The jury found that Mattel’s misappropriation was willful and malicious.
In early August 2011, the Court ruled on post-trial motions. The Court rejected MGA’sMGA's unfair competition claims and also rejected Mattel’sMattel's equitable defenses to MGA’s misappropriation of trade secrets claim. The Court reduced the jury’sjury's damages award of $88.5 million to $85.0 million. The Court awarded MGA an additional $85.0 million in punitive damages and approximately $140 million in attorney’sattorney's fees and costs. The Court entered a judgment which totaled approximately $310 million in favor of MGA.
On August 11, 2011, Mattel appealed the judgment, challenging on appeal the entirety of the District Court’s monetary award in favor of MGA, including both the award of $170 million in damages for alleged trade secret misappropriation and approximately $140 million in attorney’sattorney's fees and costs. On January 24, 2013, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling on Mattel’sMattel's appeal. In that ruling, the Court found that MGA’sMGA's claim for trade secrets misappropriation was not compulsory to any Mattel claim and could not be filed as a counterclaim-in-reply. Accordingly, the Court of Appeals vacated the portion of the judgment awarding damages and attorney’sattorney's fees and costs to MGA for prevailing on its trade secrets misappropriation claim, totaling approximately $172.5 million. It ruled that, on remand, the District Court must dismiss MGA’s trade secret claim without prejudice. In its ruling, the Court of Appeals also affirmed the District Court’s award of attorney’sattorney's fees and costs under the Copyright Act. Accordingly, Mattel recorded a litigation accrual of approximately $138 million during the fourth quarter of 2012 to cover these fees and costs.
Because multiple claimants asserted rights to the attorney’sattorney's fees portion of the judgment, on February 13, 2013, Mattel filed a motion in the District Court for orders permitting Mattel to interplead the proceeds of the judgment and releasing Mattel from liability to any claimant based on Mattel’sMattel's payment of the judgment.
On February 27, 2013, MGA filed a motion for leave to amend its prior complaint in the existing federal court lawsuit so that it could reassert its trade secrets claim. Mattel opposed that motion. On December 17, 2013, the District Court denied MGA’sMGA's motion for leave to amend and entered an order dismissing MGA’sMGA's trade secrets claim without prejudice. Also on December 17, 2013, following a settlement between MGA and certain insurance carriers, the District Court denied Mattel’sMattel's motion for leave to interplead the proceeds of the judgment.
On December 21, 2013, a stipulation regarding settlement with insurers and payment of judgment was filed in the District Court, which provided that (i) Mattel would pay approximately $138 million, including accrued interest, in full satisfaction of the copyright fees judgment, (ii) all parties would consent to entry of an order exonerating and discharging the appeal bond posted by Mattel, and (iii) MGA’sMGA's insurers would dismiss all pending actions related to the proceeds of the copyright fees judgment, including an appeal by Evanston Insurance Company in an action against Mattel that was pending in the Ninth Circuit. On December 23, 2013, Mattel paid the copyright fees judgment in the total sum, including interest, of approximately $138 million. On December 26, 2013, the District Court entered an order exonerating and discharging the appeal bond posted by Mattel, and on December 27, 2013, MGA filed an acknowledgment of satisfaction of judgment. On December 30, 2013, Evanston Insurance Company’sCompany's appeal in its action against Mattel was dismissed.
On January 13, 2014, MGA filed a new, but virtually identical, trade secrets claim against Mattel in Los Angeles County Superior Court. In its complaint, MGA purports to seek damages in excess of $1 billion. On December 3, 2014, the Court overruled Mattel’sMattel's request to dismiss MGA’sMGA's case as barred as a result of prior litigation between the parties. On July 31, 2017, Mattel filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that MGA’sMGA's complaint is barred by the statute of limitations. On February 13, 2018, the Court granted Mattel's summary judgment motion. Consistent with this ruling, Mattel anticipates that the Court will enter a finalentered judgment for Mattel.Mattel on March 8, 2018. On April 24, 2018, MGA can seek to appeal suchfiled a Notice of Appeal of the judgment, toand on December 20, 2018, MGA filed its opening appellate brief. On April 18, 2019, Mattel filed its responsive appellate brief, and on June 19, 2019, MGA filed its reply brief. Oral argument took place on October 24, 2019, and on October 29, 2019, the California Court of Appeal. Prior to the Court's ruling, Mattel believed that it was reasonably possible that damages in this matter could range from $0 to approximately $12.5 million, and that pre-judgment interest, ranging from $0 to approximately $13.0 million, could be awarded as well. In light of the Court’s summary judgment rulingAppeal issued a decision in favor of Mattel, however,affirming the granting of summary judgment. On December 9, 2019, MGA filed a Petition for Review with the California Supreme Court, to which Mattel responded on December 30, 2019. The California Supreme Court denied MGA's Petition for Review on February 11, 2020. Mattel does not presently believe that damages in any amount are reasonably possible. Accordingly, no0 liability has been accrued to date.
Litigation Related to Yellowstone do Brasil Ltda.
Yellowstone do Brasil Ltda. (formerly known as Trebbor Informática Ltda.) was a customer of Mattel’sMattel's subsidiary Mattel do Brasil Ltda. when a commercial dispute arose between Yellowstone and Mattel do Brasil regarding the supply of product and related payment terms. As a consequence of the dispute, in April 1999, Yellowstone filed a declarative action against Mattel do Brasil before the 15th Civil Court of Curitiba – State of Parana (the "Trial Court"), requesting the annulment of its security bonds and promissory notes given to Mattel do Brasil as well as requesting the Trial Court to find Mattel do Brasil liable for damages incurred as a result of Mattel do Brasil’s alleged abrupt and unreasonable breach of an oral exclusive distribution agreement between the parties relating to the supply and sale of toys in Brazil. Yellowstone’sYellowstone's complaint sought alleged loss of profits of approximately $1 million, plus an unspecified amount of damages consisting of: (i) compensation for all investments made by Yellowstone to develop Mattel do Brasil’sBrasil's business; (ii) reimbursement of the amounts paid by Yellowstone to terminate labor and civil contracts in connection with the business; (iii) compensation for alleged unfair competition and for the goodwill of trade; and (iv) compensation for non-pecuniary damages.
Mattel do Brasil filed its defenses to these claims and simultaneously presented a counterclaim for unpaid accounts receivable for goods supplied to Yellowstone in the approximate amount of $4 million.
During the evidentiary phase a first accounting report was submitted by a court-appointed expert. Such report stated that Yellowstone had invested approximately $3 million in its business. Additionally, the court-appointed expert calculated a loss of profits compensation of approximately $1 million. Mattel do Brasil challenged the report since it was not made based on the official accounting documents of Yellowstone and since the report calculated damages based only on documents unilaterally submitted by Yellowstone.
The Trial Court accepted the challenge and ruled that a second accounting examination should take place in the lawsuit. Yellowstone appealed the decision to the Court of Appeals of the State of Parana (the "Appeals Court"), but it was upheld by the Appeals Court.
The second court-appointed expert’s report submitted at trial did not assign a value to any of Yellowstone’s claims and found no evidence of causation between Mattel do Brasil’sBrasil's actions and such claims.
In January 2010, the Trial Court ruled in favor of Mattel do Brasil and denied all of Yellowstone’s claims based primarily on the lack of any causal connection between the acts of Mattel do Brasil and Yellowstone’s alleged damages. Additionally, the Trial Court upheld Mattel do Brasil’sBrasil's counterclaim and ordered Yellowstone to pay Mattel do Brasil approximately $4 million. The likelihood of Mattel do Brasil recovering this amount was uncertain due to the fact that Yellowstone was declared insolvent and filed for bankruptcy protection. In February 2010, Yellowstone filed a motion seeking clarification of the decision which was denied.
In September 2010, Yellowstone filed a further appeal with the Appeals Court. Under Brazilian law, the appeal was de novo and Yellowstone restated all of the arguments it made at the Trial Court level. Yellowstone did not provide any additional information supporting its unspecified alleged damages. The Appeals Court held hearings on the appeal in March and April 2013. On July 26, 2013, the Appeals Court awarded Yellowstone approximately $17 million in damages, plus attorney's fees, as adjusted for inflation and interest. The Appeals Court also awarded Mattel do Brasil approximately $7.5 million on its counterclaim, as adjusted for inflation. On August 2, 2013, Mattel do Brasil filed a motion with the Appeals Court for clarification since the written decision contained clear errors in terms of amounts awarded and interest and inflation adjustments. Mattel do Brasil’sBrasil's motion also asked the Appeals Court to decide whether Yellowstone’s award could be offset by the counterclaim award, despite Yellowstone’sYellowstone's status as a bankrupt entity. Yellowstone also filed a motion for clarification on August 5, 2013. A decision on the clarification motions was rendered on November 11, 2014, and the Appeals Court accepted partially the arguments raised by Mattel do Brasil. As a result, the Appeals Court awarded Yellowstone approximately $14.5 million in damages, as adjusted for inflation and interest, plus attorney's fees. The Appeals Court also awarded Mattel do Brasil approximately $7.5 million on its counterclaim, as adjusted for inflation. The decision also recognized the existence of legal rules that support Mattel do Brasil’sBrasil's right to offset its counterclaim award of approximately $7.5 million. Mattel do Brasil filed a new motion for clarification with the Appeals Court on January 21, 2015, due to the incorrect statement made by the reporting judge of the Appeals Court, that the court-appointed expert analyzed the "accounting documents" of Yellowstone. On April 26, 2015, a decision on the motion for clarification was rendered. The Appeals Court ruled that the motion for clarification was denied and imposed a fine on Mattel do Brasil equal to 1% of the value of the claims made for the delay caused by the motion. On July 3, 2015, Mattel do Brasil filed a special appeal to the Superior Court of Justice based upon both procedural and substantive grounds. This special appeal seekssought to reverse the Appeals Court's decision of July 26, 2013, and to reverse the fine as inappropriate under the law. This special appeal was submitted to the Appeals Court which must rule on its admissibility before it is transferred to the Superior Court.
Yellowstone also filed a special appeal with the Appeals Court in February 2015, which was made available to Mattel do Brasil on October 7, 2015. Yellowstone's special appeal seekssought to reverse the Appeals Court decision with respect to: (a) the limitation on Yellowstone's loss of profits claim to the amount requested in the complaint, instead of the amount contained in the first court-appointed experts report, and (b) the award of damages to Mattel do Brasil on the counterclaim, since the specific amount was not requested in Mattel do Brasil's counterclaim brief.
On October 19, 2015, Mattel do Brasil filed its answer to the special appeal filed by Yellowstone and Yellowstone filed its answer to the special appeal filed by Mattel do Brasil. On April 4, 2016, the Appeals Court rendered a decision denying the admissibility of Mattel's and Yellowstone's special appeals. On May 11, 2016, both Mattel and Yellowstone filed interlocutory appeals and are awaiting the decision.appeals.
On August 31, 2017, the reporting justice for the Appeals Court denied Yellowstone’s interlocutory appeal. As to Mattel, the reporting justice reversed the fine referenced above that had been previously imposed on Mattel for filing a motion for clarification. However, the reporting justice rejected Mattel’s arguments on the merits of Yellowstone’s damages claims. On September 22, 2017, Mattel filed a further appeal to the full panel of five appellate justices to challenge the merits of Yellowstone’sYellowstone's damages claims. Yellowstone did not file a further appeal.
Mattel believes that it is reasonably possible that a loss in this matter could range from $0 to approximately $18.0 million. The high end of this range, approximately $18.0 million, is based on the calculation of the current amount of the damages (reported in the first court-appointed examination report submitted in the lawsuit), and loss of profits (indicated in the complaint by Yellowstone), including interest, inflation, currency adjustments, plus attorney's fees.In April 2018, Mattel do Brasil will be entitledentered into a settlement agreement to offset its counterclaim award of approximately $7.0 million,resolve this matter, but the current amount including inflation, and currency adjustment, against such loss. The existence of procedural matters that will be addressedsettlement was later rejected by the courts, subject to the Superior Court of Justice adds some uncertainty to the final outcome of the matter. Mattel do Brasil believes, however, that it has valid legal grounds for ana pending appeal ofby Mattel.
On October 2, 2018, the Appeals Court decision.rejected Mattel's merits appeal, and affirmed the prior rulings in favor of Yellowstone. In October 2019, Mattel do Brasil may be required by the Trial Court to place a bond for the full amountreached an agreement with Yellowstone's former counsel regarding payment of the damage award in escrowattorney's fees portion of the judgment. In November 2019, Yellowstone initiated an action to enforce its judgment against Mattel, but did not account for an offset for Mattel's counterclaim. On January 27, 2020, Mattel obtained an injunction, staying Yellowstone's enforcement action pending anresolution of Mattel's appeal decision byto enforce the Superior Court.parties' April 2018 settlement. As of December 31, 2019, Mattel believesassessed its probable loss related to the Yellowstone matter and has accrued a loss in this matter is reasonably possible butreserve, which was not probable, no liability has been accrued to date.material.
2017 Securities Litigation
A purported class action lawsuit is pending in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, (consolidating Waterford Township Police & Fire Retirement System v. Mattel, Inc., et al., filed June 27, 2017; and Lathe v. Mattel, Inc., et al., filed July 6, 2017) against Mattel, Christopher A. Sinclair, Richard Dickson, Kevin M. Farr, and Joseph B. Johnson alleging federal securities laws violations in connection with statements allegedly made by the defendants during the period October 20, 2016 through April 20, 2017. In general, the lawsuit asserts allegations that the defendants artificially inflated Mattel’sMattel's common stock price by knowingly making materially false and misleading statements and omissions to the investing public about retail customer inventory, the alignment between point-of-sale and shipping data, and Mattel’sMattel's overall financial condition. The lawsuits allegelawsuit alleges that the defendants’defendants' conduct caused the plaintiff and other stockholders to purchase Mattel common stock at artificially inflated prices. On May 24, 2018, the Court granted Mattel's motion to dismiss the class action lawsuit, and on June 25, 2018, the plaintiff filed a motion informing the Court he would not be filing an amended complaint. Judgment was entered in favor of Mattel and the individual defendants on September 19, 2018. The plaintiff filed his Notice of Appeal on October 16, 2018 and his opening appellate brief on February 25, 2019. On April 26, 2019, Mattel filed its responsive appellate brief, and on June 17, 2019, plaintiff filed his reply brief. Oral argument occurred on February 4, 2020, and on February 20, 2020, the Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of the lawsuit.
In addition, a stockholder has filed a derivative action in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (Lombardi v. Sinclair, et al., filed December 21, 2017) making allegations that are substantially identical to, or are based upon, the allegations of the class action lawsuit. The defendants in the derivative action are the same as those in the class action lawsuit plus Margaret H. Georgiadis, Michael J. Dolan, Trevor A. Edwards, Frances D. Fergusson, Ann Lewnes, Dominic Ng, Vasant M. Prabhu, Dean A. Scarborough, Dirk Van de Put, and Kathy W. Loyd. On February 26, 2018, the derivative action was stayed pending further developments in the class action litigation.
The lawsuits seek unspecified compensatory damages, attorneys’attorneys' fees, expert fees, costs, and/or injunctive relief. Mattel believes that the allegations in the lawsuits are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them. A reasonable estimate of the amount of any possible loss or range of loss cannot be made at this time.
2019 Securities Litigation
A purported class action lawsuit is pending in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (Wyatt v. Mattel, Inc., et al., filed March 6, 2019) against Mattel, Ynon Kreiz, and Joseph J. Euteneuer alleging federal securities laws violations in connection with statements allegedly made by the defendants during the period February 7, 2019 through February 15, 2019. In general, the lawsuit alleges that the defendants artificially inflated Mattel's common stock price by knowingly making materially false and misleading statements and omissions to the investing public about Mattel's Structural Simplification Program and regarding prospects for Barbie and Hot Wheels in 2019. The lawsuit alleges that the defendants' conduct caused the plaintiff and other stockholders to purchase Mattel common stock at artificially inflated prices. In August 2019, Mattel and the individual defendants filed a motion to dismiss the case, and oral arguments occurred in December 2019. On January 21, 2020, Mattel’s motion to dismiss was granted. While plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint, she elected to dismiss her case with prejudice.
Litigation Related to the Fisher-Price Rock 'n Play Sleeper
A number of putative class action lawsuits are pending against Fisher-Price, Inc. and/or Mattel, Inc. asserting claims for false advertising, negligent product design, breach of warranty, fraud, and other claims in connection with the marketing and sale of the Fisher-Price Rock 'n Play Sleeper (the "Sleeper"). In general, the lawsuits allege that the Sleeper should not have been marketed and sold as safe and fit for prolonged and overnight sleep for infants. The putative class action lawsuits propose nationwide and over 15 statewide consumer classes comprised of those who purchased the Sleeper as marketed as safe for prolonged and overnight sleep. The class actions have been consolidated before a single judge for pre-trial purposes pursuant to the federal courts’ Multi-District Litigation program.
NaN additional lawsuits are pending against Fisher-Price, Inc. and Mattel, Inc. alleging that a product defect in the Sleeper caused the fatalities of or injuries to thirty-two children. Additionally, Fisher-Price, Inc. and/or Mattel, Inc. have also received letters from lawyers purporting to represent additional plaintiffs who are threatening to assert similar claims.
The lawsuits seek compensatory damages, punitive damages, statutory damages, restitution, disgorgement, attorneys’ fees, costs, interest, declaratory relief, and/or injunctive relief. Mattel believes that the allegations in the lawsuits are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them.
A reasonable estimate of the amount of any possible loss or range of loss cannot be made at this time.
Litigation and Investigations Related to Whistleblower Letter
In December 2019 and January 2020, two stockholders filed separate complaints styled as class actions against Mattel, Inc., and certain of its current and former officers, alleging violations of federal securities laws. The complaints rely on the results of an investigation announced by Mattel in October 2019 regarding allegations in a whistleblower letter and claim that Mattel misled the market in several of its financial statements beginning in the third quarter of 2017. The lawsuits allege that the defendants' conduct caused the plaintiff and other stockholders to purchase Mattel common stock at artificially inflated prices.
The lawsuit seeks unspecified compensatory damages, attorneys' fees, expert fees, and/or costs. Mattel believes that the allegations in the lawsuits are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them.
A reasonable estimate of the amount of any possible loss or range of loss cannot be made at this time.
Mattel also received a subpoena in December 2019 from the SEC, seeking documents related to the whistleblower letter and subsequent investigation, and is responding to the SEC's subpoena. Mattel is also responding to requests from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York ("SDNY") related to this matter. Mattel cannot predict the eventual scope, duration or outcome of potential legal action by the SEC or SDNY, if any, or whether any such action could have a material impact on Mattel's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Note 12—13—Segment Information
Description of Segments
Mattel through its subsidiaries, sellsdesigns, manufactures, and markets a broad variety of toy products worldwide, which are grouped into four major brand categories:sold to its customers and directly to consumers.
Gross Sales
Although there were no changes to Mattel's commercial operations that impacted its operating segments, in the first quarter of 2019, Mattel Girls & Boys Brandsmodified its reporting structure for revenues, as outlined below, and reorganized its regional sales reporting structure within the International segment. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Gross sales by categories are presented as follows:
Dolls—including brands such as Barbie fashion dolls,American Girl, Enchantimals,and Polly Pocket.
Infant, Toddler, and accessories ("Barbie"), Monster High, DC Super Hero Girls, Enchantimals,Preschool—including brands such as Fisher-Price and Polly Pocket (collectively "Other Girls"), Hot Wheels and Matchbox vehicles and play sets (collectively "Wheels"), and CARS,DC Comics, WWE Wrestling, Minecraft, Toy Story, and games and puzzles (collectively "Entertainment").
Fisher-Price Brands—including Fisher-Price, Little People, BabyGear, Laugh & Learn, and Imaginext (collectively "Core Fisher-Price"), Thomas & Friends,Power Wheels, Fireman Sam, and Shimmer and Shine, and Mickey Mouse Clubhouse (collectively "Fisher-Price Friends"(Nickelodeon), and Power Wheels.
American Girl BrandsVehicles—including Truly Mebrands such as Hot Wheels, Girl of the YearMatchbox,BeForever, Bitty Baby, and WellieWishersCARS (Disney Pixar).American Girl Brands products are sold directly to consumers via its catalog, website,
Action Figures, Building Sets, and proprietary retail stores, as well as sold directly to certain retailers in the U.S. and internationally.
Construction and Arts & Crafts BrandsGames—including brands such as MEGA BLOKS, UNO, Toy Story (Disney Pixar), Jurassic World (NBCUniversal),andRoseArt WWE.
Mattel’sSegment Data
Mattel's operating segments are: (i) North America, which consists of the U.S. and Canada,Canada; (ii) International,International; and (iii) American Girl. Factors considered in determining the operating segments include the nature of business activities, the management structure directly accountable to the Chief Operating Decision Maker ("CODM") for operating and administrative activities, availability of discrete financial information, and strategic priorities within the organizational structure. These factors correspond to the manner in which the CODM reviews and evaluates operating performance to make decisions about resources to be allocated to these operating segments.
The North America and International segments sell products in the Mattel Girls & Boys Brands, Fisher-Price Brands, and Construction and Arts & Crafts Brandsacross categories, although some products are developed and adapted for particular international markets.
Segment Data
The following tables present information about revenues, loss/income depreciation and amortization,(loss), and assets by segment. Mattel does not include sales adjustments such as trade discounts and other allowances in the calculation of segment revenues (referred to as "gross sales") and reconciled to net sales in the tables below). Mattel records these adjustments in its financial accounting systems at the time of sale to each customer, but the adjustments are not allocated to individual products. For this reason, Mattel’s CODMMattel's Chief Operating Decision Maker uses gross and net sales by segment as metrics to measure segment performance. Such sales adjustments are included in the determination of segment loss/income (loss) from operations based on the adjustments recorded in the financial accounting systems. Segment loss/income (loss) represents each segment’ssegment's operating loss/income (loss), while consolidated operating loss/income (loss) represents loss/income (loss) from operations before net interest, other non-operating expense/income,expense, net, and income taxes as reported in the consolidated statements of operations. The corporate and other expense category includes costs not allocated to individual segments, including charges related to incentive compensation, certain severance and other termination-relatedrestructuring costs, share-based payments, andcompensation, corporate headquarters functions managed on a worldwide basis, and the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on intercompany transactions.
| | | | For the Year Ended | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 | December 31,
2019 | | December 31, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 (b) |
| | (In thousands) | (In thousands) |
| Revenues by Segment | | | | | | | | | | |
| North America | $ | 2,536,654 |
| | $ | 3,036,181 |
| | $ | 3,083,873 |
| $ | 2,432,299 |
| | $ | 2,422,108 |
| | $ | 2,536,654 |
|
| International | 2,503,527 |
| | 2,447,615 |
| | 2,603,537 |
| 2,363,786 |
| | 2,312,230 |
| | 2,503,527 |
|
| American Girl | 473,944 |
| | 589,918 |
| | 596,218 |
| 268,489 |
| | 341,191 |
| | 473,944 |
|
| Gross sales | 5,514,125 |
| | 6,073,714 |
| | 6,283,628 |
| 5,064,574 |
| | 5,075,529 |
| | 5,514,125 |
|
| Sales adjustments | (632,174 | ) | | (617,064 | ) | | (581,015 | ) | (560,003 | ) | | (560,719 | ) | | (632,632 | ) |
| Net sales | $ | 4,881,951 |
| | $ | 5,456,650 |
| | $ | 5,702,613 |
| $ | 4,504,571 |
| | $ | 4,514,810 |
| | $ | 4,881,493 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Segment (Loss) Income | | | | | | |
| Segment Income (Loss) | | | | | | |
| North America | $ | 98,510 |
| | $ | 564,378 |
| | $ | 538,249 |
| $ | 357,039 |
| | $ | 220,769 |
| | $ | 102,710 |
|
| International | (5,864 | ) | | 291,230 |
| | 321,068 |
| 166,873 |
| | 13,915 |
| | (6,322 | ) |
| American Girl | (72,968 | ) | | 106,423 |
| | 69,899 |
| (58,813 | ) | | (17,726 | ) | | (72,968 | ) |
| | 19,678 |
| | 962,031 |
| | 929,216 |
| 465,099 |
| | 216,958 |
| | 23,420 |
|
| Corporate and other expense (a) | (362,501 | ) | | (442,798 | ) | | (388,294 | ) | (425,859 | ) | | (451,307 | ) | | (359,118 | ) |
| Operating (loss) income | (342,823 | ) | | 519,233 |
| | 540,922 |
| |
| Operating income (loss) | | 39,240 |
| | (234,349 | ) | | (335,698 | ) |
| Interest expense | 105,214 |
| | 95,118 |
| | 85,270 |
| 201,044 |
| | 181,886 |
| | 105,214 |
|
| Interest (income) | (7,777 | ) | | (9,144 | ) | | (7,230 | ) | (6,166 | ) | | (6,463 | ) | | (7,777 | ) |
| Other non-operating expense (income), net | 64,727 |
| | 23,517 |
| | (1,033 | ) | |
| (Loss) income before income taxes | $ | (504,987 | ) | | $ | 409,742 |
| | $ | 463,915 |
| |
| Other non-operating expense, net | | 2,650 |
| | 7,331 |
| | 68,110 |
|
| Loss before income taxes | | $ | (158,288 | ) | | $ | (417,103 | ) | | $ | (501,245 | ) |
| |
| (a) | Corporate and other expense includes (i) incentive compensation expense of $119.5 million, $84.1 million, and $19.4 million $16.5for 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively; (ii) $40.5 million, $104.1 million, and $50.2 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, (ii) $65.1 million, $39.9 million, and $72.0 million of charges related to severance and other termination-relatedrestructuring costs for 2019, 2018, and 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively,respectively; and (iii) share-based compensation expense of $56.0 million, $48.9 million, and $67.1 million $53.9 million,for 2019, 2018, and $56.7 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. |
| |
| (b) | In accordance with ASU 2017-07, prior period amounts have been retrospectively adjusted, which resulted in a reclassification of $3.4 millionof expense, net from other selling and administrative expenses, which is included in corporate and other expense, to other non-operating expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2017. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Depreciation/Amortization by Segment | | | | | |
| North America | $ | 112,988 |
| | $ | 130,087 |
| | $ | 118,898 |
|
| International | 85,496 |
| | 95,480 |
| | 96,623 |
|
| American Girl | 12,416 |
| | 14,391 |
| | 22,615 |
|
| | 210,900 |
| | 239,958 |
| | 238,136 |
|
| Corporate and other | 33,618 |
| | 31,974 |
| | 36,631 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | $ | 244,518 |
| | $ | 271,932 |
| | $ | 274,767 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Depreciation and Amortization by Segment | | | | | |
| North America | $ | 118,898 |
| | $ | 118,047 |
| | $ | 122,757 |
|
| International | 96,623 |
| | 88,414 |
| | 90,269 |
|
| American Girl | 22,615 |
| | 23,023 |
| | 22,054 |
|
| | 238,136 |
| | 229,484 |
| | 235,080 |
|
| Corporate and other | 36,631 |
| | 32,856 |
| | 30,347 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | $ | 274,767 |
| | $ | 262,340 |
| | $ | 265,427 |
|
Segment assets are comprised of accounts receivable and inventories, net of applicable reserves and allowances.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Assets by Segment | | | | | |
| North America | $ | 569,819 |
| | $ | 615,654 |
| | $ | 692,232 |
|
| International | 721,251 |
| | 728,870 |
| | 825,227 |
|
| American Girl | 35,004 |
| | 43,748 |
| | 100,184 |
|
| | 1,326,074 |
| | 1,388,272 |
| | 1,617,643 |
|
| Corporate and other | 105,789 |
| | 124,700 |
| | 107,713 |
|
| Accounts receivable and inventories, net | $ | 1,431,863 |
| | $ | 1,512,972 |
| | $ | 1,725,356 |
|
The table below presents worldwide revenues by categories: |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Assets by Segment | | | | | |
| North America | $ | 692,232 |
| | $ | 677,203 |
| | $ | 764,945 |
|
| International | 829,185 |
| | 766,584 |
| | 759,709 |
|
| American Girl | 100,184 |
| | 154,924 |
| | 108,414 |
|
| | 1,621,601 |
| | 1,598,711 |
| | 1,633,068 |
|
| Corporate and other | 107,713 |
| | 130,304 |
| | 99,552 |
|
| Accounts receivable and inventories, net | $ | 1,729,314 |
| | $ | 1,729,015 |
| | $ | 1,732,620 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Revenues by Categories (a) | | | | | |
| Dolls | $ | 1,724,008 |
| | $ | 1,730,907 |
| | $ | 1,725,865 |
|
| Infant, Toddler, and Preschool | 1,257,646 |
| | 1,417,820 |
| | 1,677,223 |
|
| Vehicles | 1,101,338 |
| | 1,065,452 |
| | 1,242,790 |
|
| Action Figures, Building Sets, and Games | 981,582 |
| | 861,350 |
| | 868,247 |
|
| Gross sales | 5,064,574 |
| | 5,075,529 |
| | 5,514,125 |
|
| Sales adjustments | (560,003 | ) | | (560,719 | ) | | (632,632 | ) |
| Net sales | $ | 4,504,571 |
| | $ | 4,514,810 |
| | $ | 4,881,493 |
|
| |
| (a) | Mattel modified its reporting structure for revenues in the first quarter of 2019 to disclose revenues by categories. |
Mattel sells a broad variety of toy products, which are grouped into four major categories: Mattel Girls & Boys Brands, Fisher-Price Brands, American Girl Brands, and Construction and Arts & Crafts Brands. The table below presents worldwide revenues by brand category:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Revenues by Top 3 Power Brands | | | | | |
| Barbie | $ | 1,159,768 |
| | $ | 1,088,953 |
| | $ | 954,892 |
|
| Hot Wheels | 925,854 |
| | 834,058 |
| | 777,341 |
|
| Fisher-Price and Thomas & Friends | 1,131,750 |
| | 1,185,669 |
| | 1,370,543 |
|
| Other | 1,847,202 |
| | 1,966,849 |
| | 2,411,349 |
|
| Gross sales | 5,064,574 |
| | 5,075,529 |
| | 5,514,125 |
|
| Sales adjustments | (560,003 | ) | | (560,719 | ) | | (632,632 | ) |
| Net sales | $ | 4,504,571 |
| | $ | 4,514,810 |
| | $ | 4,881,493 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Worldwide Revenues by Brand Category | | | | | |
| Mattel Girls & Boys Brands | $ | 3,077,716 |
| | $ | 3,194,100 |
| | $ | 3,464,195 |
|
| Fisher-Price Brands | 1,677,223 |
| | 1,888,146 |
| | 1,852,219 |
|
| American Girl Brands | 451,481 |
| | 570,770 |
| | 571,957 |
|
| Construction and Arts & Crafts Brands | 269,543 |
| | 377,570 |
| | 351,747 |
|
| Other | 38,162 |
| | 43,128 |
| | 43,510 |
|
| Gross sales | 5,514,125 |
| | 6,073,714 |
| | 6,283,628 |
|
| Sales adjustments | (632,174 | ) | | (617,064 | ) | | (581,015 | ) |
| Net sales | $ | 4,881,951 |
| | $ | 5,456,650 |
| | $ | 5,702,613 |
|
Geographic Information
The tables below present information by geographic area. Revenues are attributed to countries based on location of customer. Long-lived assets principally include goodwill, property, plant, and equipment, net, and identifiable intangibles, net.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Revenues | | | | | |
| North American Region (a) | $ | 2,700,788 |
| | $ | 2,763,299 |
| | $ | 3,010,598 |
|
| International Region (b): | | | | |
|
| EMEA | 1,292,948 |
| | 1,252,424 |
| | 1,281,671 |
|
| Latin America | 666,102 |
| | 653,992 |
| | 675,286 |
|
| Asia Pacific | 404,736 |
| | 405,814 |
| | 546,570 |
|
| Total International Region | 2,363,786 |
| | 2,312,230 |
| | 2,503,527 |
|
| Gross sales | 5,064,574 |
| | 5,075,529 |
| | 5,514,125 |
|
| Sales adjustments | (560,003 | ) | | (560,719 | ) | | (632,632 | ) |
| Net sales | $ | 4,504,571 |
| | $ | 4,514,810 |
| | $ | 4,881,493 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Revenues | | | | | |
| North American Region (a) | $ | 3,010,598 |
| | $ | 3,626,099 |
| | $ | 3,680,091 |
|
| International Region: | | | | | |
| Europe | 1,281,672 |
| | 1,293,302 |
| | 1,388,753 |
|
| Latin America | 675,286 |
| | 636,535 |
| | 711,041 |
|
| Asia Pacific | 546,569 |
| | 517,778 |
| | 503,743 |
|
| Total International Region | 2,503,527 |
| | 2,447,615 |
| | 2,603,537 |
|
| Gross sales | 5,514,125 |
| | 6,073,714 |
| | 6,283,628 |
|
| Sales adjustments | (632,174 | ) | | (617,064 | ) | | (581,015 | ) |
| Net sales | $ | 4,881,951 |
| | $ | 5,456,650 |
| | $ | 5,702,613 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Long-Lived Assets | | | | | |
| North American Region (c) | $ | 1,429,549 |
| | $ | 1,466,413 |
| | $ | 1,543,662 |
|
| International Region | 1,276,616 |
| | 1,374,676 |
| | 1,506,503 |
|
| Consolidated total | $ | 2,706,165 |
| | $ | 2,841,089 |
| | $ | 3,050,165 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Long-Lived Assets | | | | | |
| North American Region (b) | $ | 1,543,662 |
| | $ | 1,566,621 |
| | $ | 1,557,153 |
|
| International Region | 1,506,503 |
| | 1,478,747 |
| | 1,466,003 |
|
| Long-lived assets | $ | 3,050,165 |
| | $ | 3,045,368 |
| | $ | 3,023,156 |
|
| |
| (a) | Revenues for the North American Region include revenues attributable to the U.S. of $2.54 billion, $2.60 billion, and $2.82 billion $3.39 billion,for 2019, 2018, and $3.46 billion for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. |
| |
| (b) | Mattel reorganized its regional reporting structure in the first quarter of 2019. As a result, the new regions are Europe, the Middle East, and Africa ("EMEA"), Latin America, and Asia Pacific. The Middle East, Africa, Russia, and Turkey were previously included in the Asia Pacific regions (previously Global Emerging Markets) and are now included in EMEA (previously Europe). Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. |
| |
| (c) | Long-lived assets for the North American Region include long-lived assets attributable to the U.S. of $1.39 billion, $1.42 billion, and $1.49 billion $1.57 billion,for 2019, 2018, and $1.57 billion for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. |
Major Customers
Sales to Mattel’s threetwo largest customers accounted for 37%32%, 39%34%, and 37%29% of worldwide consolidated net sales for 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015,2017, respectively, as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| | (In billions) |
| Walmart | $ | 1.01 |
| | $ | 1.07 |
| | $ | 1.02 |
|
| Target | $ | 0.44 |
| | $ | 0.45 |
| | $ | 0.37 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 |
| | (In billions) |
| Wal-Mart | $ | 1.0 |
| | $ | 1.1 |
| | $ | 1.0 |
|
| Toys "R" Us | 0.4 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 0.6 |
|
| Target | 0.4 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 0.5 |
|
The North America segment sells products to each of Mattel’s threetwo largest customers. The International segment sells products to Wal-Mart and Toys "R" Us.Walmart. The American Girl segment sells its children’s publications to each of Mattel's threetwo largest customers.
Note 13—14—Restructuring Charges
Structural Simplification Cost Savings Program
During the third quarter of 2017, Mattel initiated its Structural Simplification Cost Savings program, with plans to target at least $650 million in net cost savings by 2020.program. The major initiatives of the Structural Simplification Cost Savingscost savings program include:
Reducing manufacturing complexity, including SKU reduction, and implementing process improvement initiatives at owned and co-manufacturing facilities;
Streamlining the organizational structure and reducing headcount expense to better align with the revenue base; and
Optimizing advertising spend.
Mattel completed its Structural Simplification cost savings program as of December 31, 2019. In connection with the Structural Simplification Cost Savingscost savings program, Mattel recorded severance and other termination-related charges of $45.1 millionrestructuring costs in the following cost and expense categories within other selling and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations, which is included in corporate and other expense in "Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Segment Information." Mattel expects to incur total charges of approximately $160 million during 2018 and 2019 related to the Structural Simplification Cost Savings program.operations:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Cost of sales (a) | $ | — |
| | $ | 5,741 |
|
| Other selling and administrative (b) | 21,516 |
| | 104,089 |
|
| | $ | 21,516 |
| | $ | 109,830 |
|
| |
| (a) | Severance and other restructuring costs recorded within cost of sales include plant restructuring charges. |
| |
| (b) | Severance and other restructuring costs recorded within other selling and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations are included in Corporate and Other expense in "Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Segment Information." |
The following table summarizes Mattel's severance and other termination-relatedrestructuring costs activity:activity related to the Structural Simplification cost savings program for the year ended December 31, 2019:
| | | | Liability at December 31, 2016 | | Charges | | Payments/Utilization | | Liability at December 31, 2017 | Liability at December 31, 2018 | | Charges | | Payments/Utilization | | Liability at December 31, 2019 |
| | (In thousands) | (In thousands) |
| Severance | $ | — |
| | $ | 38,362 |
| | $ | (8,568 | ) | | $ | 29,794 |
| $ | 27,670 |
| | $ | 11,742 |
| | $ | (30,010 | ) | | $ | 9,402 |
|
| Other termination costs | — |
| | 6,764 |
| | (1,370 | ) | | 5,394 |
| |
| Other restructuring costs (a) | | 13,722 |
| | 9,774 |
| | (16,905 | ) | | 6,591 |
|
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 45,126 |
| | $ | (9,938 | ) | | $ | 35,188 |
| $ | 41,392 |
| | $ | 21,516 |
| | $ | (46,915 | ) | | $ | 15,993 |
|
| |
| (a) | Consists primarily of consulting fees. |
Mattel has recorded cumulative severance and other restructuring charges of $176.5 million related to the Structural Simplification cost savings program.
Capital Light Program
During the first quarter of 2019, Mattel announced the commencement of its Capital Light program to optimize Mattel's manufacturing footprint (including the sale or consolidation of manufacturing facilities), increase the productivity of its plant infrastructure, and achieve additional efficiencies across its entire supply chain.
In connection with the Capital Light program, Mattel recorded severance and other restructuring costs in the following cost and expense categories within the consolidated statements of operations:
|
| | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Cost of sales (a) | $ | 18,579 |
|
| Other selling and administrative (b) | 18,992 |
|
| | $ | 37,571 |
|
| |
| (a) | Severance and other restructuring costs recorded within cost of sales include plant restructuring charges. |
| |
| (b) | Severance and other restructuring costs recorded within other selling and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations are included in Corporate and Other expense in "Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Segment Information." |
The following table summarizes Mattel's severance and other restructuring charges activity related to the Capital Light program for the year ended December 31, 2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Liability at December 31, 2018 | | Charges | | Payments/Utilization | | Liability at December 31, 2019 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Severance | $ | — |
| | $ | 18,992 |
| | $ | (12,841 | ) | | $ | 6,151 |
|
| Other restructuring charges (a) | — |
| | 18,579 |
| | (7,095 | ) | | 11,484 |
|
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 37,571 |
| | $ | (19,936 | ) | | $ | 17,635 |
|
| |
| (a) | Consists primarily of plant restructuring non-cash charges and exit obligation. |
To date, Mattel has recorded cumulative severance and other restructuring charges of $37.6 million, which includes non-cash charges of approximately $11 million. Mattel expects to incur total severance and restructuring charges, excluding non-cash charges, of approximately $35 million related to the Capital Light program.
Note 14—15—Income Taxes
Consolidated pre-tax (loss) incomeloss consists of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| | (In thousands) |
| U.S. operations | $ | (330,139 | ) | | $ | (344,443 | ) | | $ | (269,244 | ) |
| Foreign operations | 171,851 |
| | (72,660 | ) | | (232,001 | ) |
| | $ | (158,288 | ) | | $ | (417,103 | ) | | $ | (501,245 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| U.S. operations | $ | (273,444 | ) | | $ | 9,179 |
| | $ | (3,435 | ) |
| Foreign operations | (231,543 | ) | | 400,563 |
| | 467,350 |
|
| | $ | (504,987 | ) | | $ | 409,742 |
| | $ | 463,915 |
|
The provision (benefit) for current and deferred income taxes consists of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Current | | | | | |
| Federal | $ | 5,520 |
| | $ | 3,935 |
| | $ | (3,153 | ) |
| State | 2,170 |
| | 1,340 |
| | 1,885 |
|
| Foreign | 68,837 |
| | 95,404 |
| | 113,315 |
|
| | 76,527 |
| | 100,679 |
| | 112,047 |
|
| Deferred | | | | | |
| Federal | (5,610 | ) | | (4,630 | ) | | 422,397 |
|
| State | 68 |
| | (3,368 | ) | | 38,819 |
|
| Foreign | (15,761 | ) | | 23,515 |
| | (19,929 | ) |
| | (21,303 | ) | | 15,517 |
| | 441,287 |
|
| Provision for income taxes | $ | 55,224 |
| | $ | 116,196 |
| | $ | 553,334 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Current | | | | | |
| Federal | $ | (3,153 | ) | | $ | (3,041 | ) | | $ | (1,405 | ) |
| State | 1,885 |
| | 2,455 |
| | 1,946 |
|
| Foreign | 113,315 |
| | 91,070 |
| | 89,825 |
|
| | 112,047 |
| | 90,484 |
| | 90,366 |
|
| Deferred | | | | | |
| Federal | 418,341 |
| | (4,624 | ) | | (3,802 | ) |
| State | 38,450 |
| | 2,623 |
| | (2,200 | ) |
| Foreign | (19,989 | ) | | 3,237 |
| | 10,135 |
|
| | 436,802 |
| | 1,236 |
| | 4,133 |
|
| Provision for income taxes | $ | 548,849 |
| | $ | 91,720 |
| | $ | 94,499 |
|
Deferred income taxes are provided principally for tax credit carryforwards, net operating loss carryforwards, research and development expenses, employee compensation-related expenses, and certain other reserves that are recognized in different years for financial statement and income tax reporting purposes. In the fourth quarter of 2019, Mattel transferred certain intangible property rights among its wholly-owned subsidiaries, which resulted in an increase in deferred tax assets of approximately $245 million. Based on available objective evidence, management believes it is not more-likely-than-not that these additional deferred tax assets will be realizable as of December 31, 2019, and therefore, are offset by a full valuation allowance. Mattel’s deferred income tax assets (liabilities) are composed of the following: |
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Tax credit carryforwards | $ | 59,640 |
| | $ | 64,895 |
|
| Research and development expenses | 58,340 |
| | 76,906 |
|
| Net operating loss carryforwards | 234,640 |
| | 187,741 |
|
| Allowances and reserves | 100,896 |
| | 94,168 |
|
| Deferred compensation | 67,689 |
| | 63,641 |
|
| Postretirement benefits | 33,839 |
| | 24,666 |
|
| Intangible assets | 245,138 |
| | 419 |
|
| Other | 43,485 |
| | 48,262 |
|
| Gross deferred income tax assets | 843,667 |
| | 560,698 |
|
| Intangible assets | (190,677 | ) | | (196,012 | ) |
| Other | (31,024 | ) | | (15,782 | ) |
| Gross deferred income tax liabilities | (221,701 | ) | | (211,794 | ) |
| Deferred income tax asset valuation allowances | (610,560 | ) | | (365,820 | ) |
| Net deferred income tax assets (liabilities) | $ | 11,406 |
| | $ | (16,916 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Tax credit carryforwards | $ | 222,353 |
| | $ | 59,426 |
|
| Allowances and reserves | 176,248 |
| | 204,661 |
|
| Net operating loss carryforwards | 139,544 |
| | 165,522 |
|
| Research and development expenses | 92,443 |
| | 193,908 |
|
| Deferred compensation | 49,616 |
| | 78,245 |
|
| Postretirement benefits | 30,564 |
| | 47,732 |
|
| Intangible assets | 6,096 |
| | 9,160 |
|
| Other | 50,554 |
| | 62,057 |
|
| Gross deferred income tax assets | 767,418 |
| | 820,711 |
|
| Intangible assets | (175,921 | ) | | (295,968 | ) |
| Gross deferred income tax liabilities | (175,921 | ) | | (295,968 | ) |
| Deferred income tax asset valuation allowances | (579,245 | ) | | (74,125 | ) |
| Net deferred income tax assets | $ | 12,252 |
| | $ | 450,618 |
|
Net deferred income tax assets (liabilities) are reported in the consolidated balance sheets as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Other noncurrent assets | $ | 67,900 |
| | $ | 49,937 |
|
| Other noncurrent liabilities | (56,494 | ) | | (66,853 | ) |
| | $ | 11,406 |
| | $ | (16,916 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Other noncurrent assets | $ | 76,750 |
| | $ | 508,363 |
|
| Other noncurrent liabilities | (64,498 | ) | | (57,745 | ) |
| | $ | 12,252 |
| | $ | 450,618 |
|
As of December 31, 2017,2019, Mattel had federal, state and foreign loss carryforwards totaling $632.9$672.1 million and tax credit carryforwards of $222.4$52.6 million, which excludes carryforwards that do not meet the threshold for recognition in the financial statements. Utilization of these loss and tax credit carryforwards is subject to annual limitations. Mattel’s loss and tax credit carryforwards expire in the following periods:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Loss
Carryforwards | | Tax Credit
Carryforwards |
| | (In thousands) |
| 2020–2024 | $ | 40,890 |
| | $ | 456 |
|
| Thereafter | 187,120 |
| | 31,809 |
|
| No expiration date | 444,094 |
| | 20,293 |
|
| Total | $ | 672,104 |
| | $ | 52,558 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Loss Carryforwards | | Tax Credit Carryforwards |
| | (In thousands) |
| 2018 – 2022 | $ | 39,939 |
| | $ | 7,085 |
|
| Thereafter | 317,915 |
| | 193,867 |
|
| No expiration date | 275,061 |
| | 21,401 |
|
| Total | $ | 632,915 |
| | $ | 222,353 |
|
Mattel regularly assesses the need for a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. In making that assessment,Periodically, Mattel considers both positive and negative evidence related to the likelihood of realization of the deferred tax assets to determine, based on the weight of available evidence, whether it is more likely-than-not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As a resultDuring the third quarter of evaluating the need for a valuation allowance,2017, Mattel established a valuation allowance on U.S. deferred tax assets that will more than likely not be realized due to the determination that negative evidence outweighed the positive evidence. As of December 31, 2019, Mattel's valuation allowance on its U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2017was approximately $300 million. Changes in the amount of $561.9 million.valuation allowance in 2019 primarily related to current year losses and credits generated. As of December 31, 2017,2018, Mattel's valuation allowance on its federal and state deferred tax assets was approximately $291 million. Changes in the valuation allowance was reduced to $511.8 million, in large part due2018 primarily related to the loweringutilization of loss and credit carryforwards against the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018on the inclusion of accumulated foreign earnings under the U.S. Tax Act, offset by current year losses and other changes in deferred taxes during the fourth quarter of 2017. The amount shown as a U.S. valuation allowance in the effective tax rate table below include certain other impacts on U.S. deferred taxes. The valuation allowance does not impact Mattel's actual ability under applicable tax laws to utilize deferred tax assets such as loss carryforwards and tax credits to reduce future cash tax payments if and when sufficient income is earned prior to the expiration of the deferred tax assets. Mattel will continue to assess the likelihood that the deferred tax assets will be realizable at each period end.generated.
In addition, as of December 31, 2019, management determined that a valuation allowance of $67.4approximately $311 million was required as of December 31, 2017 for thosecertain foreign deferred tax assets for which there isthat will more than likely not sufficientbe realized due to the determination that negative evidence as to their ultimate utilization, related to certain foreign affiliates.outweighed the positive evidence. Changes in the valuation allowance for 20172019 primarily relaterelated to increases in the valuation allowance as related to the transfer of intangible property rights as described above. For the remaining foreign deferred tax assets without a valuation allowance, management believes it is more-likely-than-not that Mattel will generate sufficient taxable income in the appropriate future periods to realize the benefit of the remaining deferred income tax assets. As of December 31, 2018, management determined that a valuation allowance of approximately $75 million was required for certain foreign deferred tax assets that will more than likely not be realized due to the determination that negative evidence outweighed the positive evidence. Changes in the valuation allowance for 2018 primarily related to increases in the valuation allowance related to losses without benefits, offset by decreases in the valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets and expirations of tax loss and/or tax credit carryforwards. Management believes it is more-likely-than-not (a greater than 50 percent likelihood) that Mattel will generate sufficient taxable income in the appropriate future periods to realize the benefit of the remaining net deferred income tax assets of $12.3 million.
Differences between the provision for income taxes at the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate and the provision in the consolidated statements of operations are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Benefit at U.S. federal statutory rate | $ | (33,240 | ) | | $ | (87,592 | ) | | $ | (175,436 | ) |
| Increase resulting from: | | | | | |
| U.S. valuation allowance | 19,141 |
| | 64,907 |
| | 558,976 |
|
| Foreign earnings taxed at different rates, including foreign losses without benefit | 51,612 |
| | 103,231 |
| | 266,807 |
|
| U.S. Tax Act (a) | — |
| | 3,709 |
| | (107,049 | ) |
| State and local taxes, net of U.S. federal (expense) benefit | 2,438 |
| | (2,028 | ) | | 2,254 |
|
| Adjustments to previously accrued taxes | 14,160 |
| | 6,621 |
| | 5,159 |
|
| Change in indefinite reinvestment assertion | (2,700 | ) | | 14,566 |
| | — |
|
| Other (b) | 3,813 |
| | 12,782 |
| | 2,623 |
|
| Provision for income taxes | $ | 55,224 |
| | $ | 116,196 |
| | $ | 553,334 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| (Benefit) provision at U.S. federal statutory rate | $ | (176,745 | ) | | $ | 143,410 |
| | $ | 162,370 |
|
| Increase (decrease) resulting from: | | | | | |
| U.S. valuation allowance | 554,551 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Foreign earnings taxed at different rates, including withholding taxes | 265,112 |
| | (51,711 | ) | | (56,877 | ) |
| U.S. Tax Reform | (105,279 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Foreign losses without income tax benefit | 1,475 |
| | 8,526 |
| | 5,843 |
|
| State and local taxes, net of U.S. federal benefit | 1,885 |
| | 3,385 |
| | 482 |
|
| Adjustments to previously accrued taxes | 5,159 |
| | (12,537 | ) | | (19,134 | ) |
| Other | 2,691 |
| | 647 |
| | 1,815 |
|
| Provision for income taxes | $ | 548,849 |
| | $ | 91,720 |
| | $ | 94,499 |
|
| |
| (a) | For 2018, U.S. Tax Act expense was netted with utilization of carryover tax attributes and current year generated tax attributes. |
| |
| (b) | For 2018, Other includes $8.1 million of tax credit expiration. |
In assessing whether uncertain tax positions should be recognized in its financial statements, Mattel first determines whether it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. In evaluating whether a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, Mattel presumes that the position will be examined by the appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of all relevant information. For tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, Mattel measures the amount of benefit recognized in the financial statements at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Mattel recognizes unrecognized tax benefits in the first financial reporting period in which information becomes available indicating that such benefits will more-likely-than-not be realized.
Mattel records a reserve for unrecognized tax benefits for U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign tax positions related primarily to transfer pricing, tax credits claimed, tax nexus, and apportionment. For each reporting period, management applies a consistent methodology to measure unrecognized tax benefits, and all unrecognized tax benefits are reviewed periodically and adjusted as circumstances warrant. Mattel’s measurement of its reserve for unrecognized tax benefits is based on management’s assessment of all relevant information, including prior audit experience, the status of audits, conclusions of tax audits, lapsing of applicable statutes of limitations, identification of new issues, and any administrative guidance or developments.
A reconciliation of the reserve for unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Unrecognized tax benefits at January 1 | $ | 119,818 |
| | $ | 116,070 |
| | $ | 109,347 |
|
| Increases for positions taken in current year | 3,836 |
| | 7,548 |
| | 4,171 |
|
| Increases for positions taken in a prior year | 29,487 |
| | 25,239 |
| | 19,318 |
|
| Decreases for positions taken in a prior year | (10,150 | ) | | (1,813 | ) | | (5,637 | ) |
| Decreases for settlements with taxing authorities | (1,982 | ) | | (1,143 | ) | | (2,349 | ) |
| Decreases for lapses in the applicable statute of limitations | (3,080 | ) | | (26,083 | ) | | (8,780 | ) |
| Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31 | $ | 137,929 |
| | $ | 119,818 |
| | $ | 116,070 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Unrecognized tax benefits at January 1 | $ | 109,347 |
| | $ | 118,099 |
| | $ | 100,357 |
|
| Increases for positions taken in current year | 4,171 |
| | 2,925 |
| | 5,724 |
|
| Increases for positions taken in a prior year | 19,318 |
| | 921 |
| | 22,584 |
|
| Decreases for positions taken in a prior year | (5,637 | ) | | (1,706 | ) | | (4,242 | ) |
| Decreases for settlements with taxing authorities | (2,349 | ) | | (1,097 | ) | | (3,577 | ) |
| Decreases for lapses in the applicable statute of limitations | (8,780 | ) | | (9,795 | ) | | (2,747 | ) |
| Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31 | $ | 116,070 |
| | $ | 109,347 |
| | $ | 118,099 |
|
Of the $116.1$137.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2017, $112.32019, $61.7 million would impact the effective tax rate if recognized, of which approximately $66.8$76.2 million would result in an increase in the valuation allowance.
Mattel recognized an increasea decrease of interest and penalties of approximately $2$1.6 million in 2017, a decrease2019, an increase of $2$7.9 million in 20162018, and $0an increase of $1.6 million in 2015,2017, related to unrecognized tax benefits, which are reflected in the provision for income taxes in the consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2017,2019, Mattel accrued $18.6$24.8 million in interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits. Of this balance, $17.7 millionbenefits, all of which would impact the effective tax rate if recognized. As of December 31, 2016,2018, Mattel accrued $17.1$26.4 million in interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits.benefits, all of which would impact the effective tax rate if recognized.
InEffects of the normal courseU.S. Tax Act were required to be accounted for in the period of business, Mattelenactment (the fourth quarter of 2017) for calendar year-end companies. Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 118 was issued shortly thereafter to address the application of U.S. GAAP in the period of enactment when a company is regularly audited by federal, state, local and foreign tax authorities. In May 2014,unable to complete the IRS completed its audit of Mattel’s 2010 and 2011 federalaccounting for certain income tax returns. Mattel remains subject to IRS examination for the 2014 through 2017 tax years. Mattel files multiple state and local income tax returns and remains subject to examination in various of these jurisdictions, including California for the 2008 through 2017 tax years, New York for the 2010 through 2017 tax years, and Wisconsin for the 2008 through 2017 tax years. Mattel files multiple foreign income tax returns and remains subject to examination in major foreign jurisdictions, including Hong Kong for the 2011 through 2017 tax years, Brazil, Mexico and Netherlands for the 2012 through 2017 tax years and Russia for the 2015 through 2017 tax years. Based on the current status of federal, state, local and foreign audits, Mattel believes it is reasonably possible that in the next 12 months, the total unrecognized tax benefits could decrease by $27.6 million related to the settlement of tax audits and/or the expiration of statutes of limitations. The ultimate settlement of any particular issue with the applicable taxing authority could have a material impact on Mattel’s consolidated financial statements.
The income tax provision included net tax expense of $454.4 million in 2017, and net tax benefits of $16.8 million and $19.1 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively. The 2017 net tax expense primarily relates to the establishment of a valuation allowance in the third quarter on U.S. deferred tax assets that will likely not be realized and a provisional estimateeffects of the impact of U.S. Tax Reform inAct, extending the "measurement period" to one year from the enactment date (i.e. extended to the fourth quarter of 2017. The 2016 net tax benefits primarily related to reassessments of prior years’ tax liabilities based on the status of audits and tax filings in various jurisdictions around the world, settlements, enacted tax law changes, and the adoption of ASU 2016-09. The 2015 net tax benefits primarily related to reassessments of prior years’ tax liabilities based on the status of audits and tax filings in various jurisdictions around the world, settlements, and enacted tax law changes.
The cumulative amount of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries that Mattel intends to indefinitely reinvest and upon which no deferred U.S. income taxes have been provided is approximately $7.0 billion as of December 31, 2017. Management periodically reviews the undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries and reassesses the intent to indefinitely reinvest such earnings. It is not practicable for Mattel to determine the deferred tax liability associated with these undistributed earnings due2018). Revisions to the availabilitytax impact for the period of foreign tax credits, the complexity of Mattel's international holding company structure, the rules governing the utilization of foreign tax credits, and the interplay between utilization of such foreign tax credits and Mattel’s other significant tax attributes.
On December 22, 2017, H.R.1, also knownenactment should be accounted for each period (not to extend beyond one-year) as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act” or "U.S. Tax Reform"), was enacted.estimate is refined. The U.S. Tax Act significantly revises the U.S. corporate income tax by, among other things, lowering the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, implementing the territorial tax system, and imposing a transition tax on deemed repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries.
The changes included There was no change in the Tax Act are broad and complex. Furthermore, the Securities Exchange Commission has issued guidance under Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 that allows for companies to provide provisional amounts for certain income2017 tax effects of the Tax Act for which the company can provide a reasonable estimate. The guidance also provides that a company may not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act, in which case the company would not be expected to provide a provisional amount for those specific items. Additionally, the guidance allows for a measurement period of up to one year after the enactment date of the Tax Act to finalize the recording of thecharge related tax impacts.
In line with the above-mentioned guidance, Mattel has made a provisional assessment of the impact of the corporate tax rate change on its results of operations, cash flows and consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, a provisional income tax benefit of $105.3 million has been recorded for the year ended December 31, 2017. Of this amount, approximately $52.3 million relates to the remeasurement of the U.S. net deferred tax liabilities from the 35% to 21% tax rate and $53.0 million relates to the revised deferred tax netting from the third quarterassets recorded in 2017.
As of 2017 to the fourth quarter of 2017. Mattel has not yet determined a reasonable estimate2018, at the close of the impact ofSAB 118 measurement period, Mattel recorded a $3.7 million tax expense related to the deemed repatriation of accumulated foreign earnings (net of related valuation allowance change). In January 2018, the FASB issued guidance stating that a company must make an accounting policy election of either (i) treating taxes due on future U.S. inclusions in taxable income related to Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income ("GILTI") as a current-period expense when incurred (the "period cost method") or (ii) factoring such amounts into a company’s measurement of its deferred taxes (the "deferred method"). Mattel has elected the period cost method with respect to reporting taxes due on GILTI income inclusions.
On January 1, 2018, Mattel adopted ASU 2016-16, Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which required Mattel to recognize the income tax effects of intercompany sales and transfers of assets other than inventory in the period in which the transfer occurs. Previously, the income tax effect of intercompany transfers of assets was deferred until the asset was sold to an outside party or otherwise recognized (e.g., depreciated, amortized, impaired). The new guidance requires Mattel to defer only the income tax effects of intercompany transfers of inventory. A cumulative effect adjustment of $9.4 million was recorded as an increase to beginning retained earnings in the first quarter of 2018.
In the normal course of business, Mattel is regularly audited by federal, state, local and foreign tax authorities. Mattel remains subject to IRS examination for the 2016 through 2019 tax years. Mattel files multiple state and local income tax returns and remains subject to examination in various jurisdictions, including California for the 2008 through 2019 tax years, New York for the 2017 through 2019 tax years, and Wisconsin for the 2009 through 2019 tax years. Mattel files multiple foreign income tax returns and remains subject to examination in various foreign jurisdictions including Hong Kong for the 2012 through 2019 tax years, Brazil for the 2014 through 2019 tax years, Mexico for the 2012 through 2019 tax years, Netherlands for the 2014 through 2019 tax years, and Russia for the 2016 through 2019 tax years. Based on the current status of federal, state, local, and foreign audits, Mattel believes it is reasonably possible that in the next 12 months, the total unrecognized tax benefits could decrease by $12.3 million related to the complexities inherent in the existing legal entity structure, history of acquisitions, and the current circumstance of carrying a valuation allowance against Mattel's U.S. deferred tax assets. Additionally, the accumulated foreign earnings charge may result in the utilization and realizationsettlement of tax credit carryforwards, net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets that may further result in a change inaudits and/or the valuation allowance recorded on such items. Allexpiration of statutes of limitations. The ultimate settlement of any issue with the items noted may individuallyapplicable taxing authority could have a material impact on the effectMattel’s consolidated financial statements.
Mattel has recorded a deferred tax liability of the toll charge$11.9 million and therefore we cannot make$14.6 million related to undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The impact in 2019 was a reasonable estimate at this time. These factors also contribute significant complexitytax benefit of $2.7 million mainly related to determining the impact of other aspects of U.S. Tax Reform, including the impact of the Base Erosion Anti-Abuse Tax ("BEAT"), Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income ("GILTI"), andwithholding tax elections and methods that could impact the effect of the rate change during the year. Taxes have not been provided on its deferred tax balances at the dateapproximately $6.7 billion of enactmentundistributed foreign U.S. GAAP retained earnings of the Tax Act.
The final transition impact of the Tax Act may result in a material increase in taxes payable and tax expense, due to, among other things, changes in interpretations of the Tax Act, legislative action to address questions that arise because of the Tax Act, or changes in accounting standards for income taxes or related interpretations in response towhich $4.7 billion was previously taxed under the Tax Act. As Mattel completes its analysisThe determination of the accounting for theany incremental tax effects of enactment of the Tax Act, it may record additional provisional amounts or adjustments to provisional amounts as discrete items in future periods. The Company expects to complete the accounting forliability associated with these impacts of the Tax Act in the fourth quarter of 2018 as it completes its analysis and receives additional guidance from the Internal Revenue Service pertainingearnings is not practicable due to the Tax Act.complexity of local country withholding rules and interactions with tax treaties, foreign exchange considerations, and the diversity of state income tax treatment on actual distribution. Mattel will remit reinvested earnings of its foreign subsidiaries for which a deferred tax liability has been recorded when the Company determines that it is advantageous for business operations or cash management purposes.
Note 15—16—Supplemental Financial Information
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Inventories include the following: | | | |
| Raw materials and work in process | $ | 103,123 |
| | $ | 115,966 |
|
| Finished goods | 392,381 |
| | 426,923 |
|
| | $ | 495,504 |
| | $ | 542,889 |
|
| Other noncurrent assets include the following: | | | |
| Identifiable intangibles (net of accumulated amortization of $248.0 million and $207.9 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively) | $ | 553,114 |
| | $ | 587,528 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | 67,900 |
| | 49,937 |
|
| Other | 212,198 |
| | 209,541 |
|
| | $ | 833,212 |
| | $ | 847,006 |
|
| Accrued liabilities include the following: | | | |
| Incentive compensation | $ | 122,923 |
| | $ | 87,086 |
|
| Royalties | 94,228 |
| | 98,011 |
|
| Advertising and promotion | 93,804 |
| | 86,935 |
|
| Lease liability | 74,065 |
| | — |
|
| Other | 384,493 |
| | 422,239 |
|
| | $ | 769,513 |
| | $ | 694,271 |
|
| Other noncurrent liabilities include the following: | | | |
| Benefit plan liabilities | 212,280 |
| | 186,380 |
|
| Noncurrent tax liabilities | 125,515 |
| | 150,960 |
|
| Other | 101,206 |
| | 132,329 |
|
| | $ | 439,001 |
| | $ | 469,669 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Inventories include the following: | | | |
| Raw materials and work in process | $ | 101,690 |
| | $ | 112,327 |
|
| Finished goods | 499,014 |
| | 501,471 |
|
| | $ | 600,704 |
| | $ | 613,798 |
|
| Other noncurrent assets include the following: | | | |
| Identifiable intangibles (net of amortization of $168.8 million and $153.7 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively) | $ | 639,203 |
| | $ | 201,859 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | 76,750 |
| | 508,363 |
|
| Nonamortizable identifiable intangibles | — |
| | 458,589 |
|
| Other | 229,008 |
| | 223,326 |
|
| | $ | 944,961 |
| | $ | 1,392,137 |
|
| Accrued liabilities include the following: | | | |
| Advertising and promotion | $ | 165,572 |
| | $ | 85,116 |
|
| Royalties | 111,669 |
| | 107,077 |
|
| Taxes other than income taxes | 74,626 |
| | 67,555 |
|
| Incentive compensation | 20,218 |
| | 18,830 |
|
| Other | 420,054 |
| | 350,248 |
|
| | $ | 792,139 |
| | $ | 628,826 |
|
| Other noncurrent liabilities include the following: | | | |
| Benefit plan liabilities | $ | 168,539 |
| | $ | 192,466 |
|
| Noncurrent tax liabilities | 124,330 |
| | 96,871 |
|
| Other | 191,257 |
| | 156,831 |
|
| | $ | 484,126 |
| | $ | 446,168 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Currency transaction losses included in: | | | | | |
| Operating income (loss) | $ | 164 |
| | $ | (5,061 | ) | | $ | (29,678 | ) |
| Other non-operating expense, net | (527 | ) | | (3,328 | ) | | (6,525 | ) |
| Net transaction losses | $ | (363 | ) | | $ | (8,389 | ) | | $ | (36,203 | ) |
| Other selling and administrative expenses include the following: | | | | | |
| Design and development | $ | 197,226 |
| | $ | 205,368 |
| | $ | 225,245 |
|
| Identifiable intangible asset amortization | $ | 40,112 |
| | $ | 39,095 |
| | $ | 23,273 |
|
| Bad debt expense, net | $ | 967 |
| | $ | 40,894 |
| | $ | 17,568 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Currency transaction losses included in: | | | | | |
| Operating (loss) income | $ | (29,678 | ) | | $ | (164,042 | ) | | $ | (25,715 | ) |
| Other non-operating (expense) income, net | (6,525 | ) | | (27,290 | ) | | (8,291 | ) |
| Net transaction losses | $ | (36,203 | ) | | $ | (191,332 | ) | | $ | (34,006 | ) |
| Other selling and administrative expenses include the following: | | | | | |
| Design and development | $ | 225,245 |
| | $ | 215,304 |
| | $ | 217,816 |
|
| Identifiable intangible asset amortization | 23,273 |
| | 22,215 |
| | 27,923 |
|
| Bad debt expense | 17,568 |
| | 9,165 |
| | 5,813 |
|
Note 16—17—Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
| | | | First Quarter | | Second Quarter | | Third Quarter | | Fourth Quarter | First Quarter | | Second Quarter | | Third Quarter | | Fourth Quarter |
| | (In thousands, except per share amounts) | (In thousands, except per share amounts) |
| Year Ended December 31, 2017 | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2019 | | | | | | | | |
| Net sales | $ | 735,618 |
| | $ | 974,477 |
| | $ | 1,560,983 |
| | $ | 1,610,873 |
| $ | 689,246 |
| | $ | 860,063 |
| | $ | 1,481,557 |
| | $ | 1,473,705 |
|
| Gross profit | 278,778 |
| | 399,765 |
| | 647,149 |
| | 495,137 |
| |
| Advertising and promotion expenses | 73,562 |
| | 95,499 |
| | 179,691 |
| | 293,534 |
| |
| Other selling and administrative expenses | 332,244 |
| | 352,943 |
| | 381,756 |
| | 454,423 |
| |
| Operating (loss) income | (127,028 | ) | | (48,677 | ) | | 85,702 |
| | (252,820 | ) | |
| (Loss) income before income taxes | (145,671 | ) | | (73,743 | ) | | 61,263 |
| | (346,836 | ) | |
| Net loss (a) | (113,231 | ) | | (56,075 | ) | | (603,247 | ) | | (281,283 | ) | |
| Net loss per common share—basic | $ | (0.33 | ) | | $ | (0.16 | ) | | $ | (1.75 | ) | | $ | (0.82 | ) | |
| Weighted average number of common shares | 342,914 |
| | 343,116 |
| | 343,870 |
| | 344,294 |
| |
| Net loss per common share—diluted | $ | (0.33 | ) | | $ | (0.16 | ) | | $ | (1.75 | ) | | $ | (0.82 | ) | |
| Weighted average number of common and potential common shares | 342,914 |
| | 343,116 |
| | 343,870 |
| | 344,294 |
| |
| Dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.38 |
| | $ | 0.38 |
| | $ | 0.15 |
| | $ | — |
| |
| Common stock market price: | | | | | | | | |
| High | $ | 31.56 |
| | $ | 25.73 |
| | $ | 21.63 |
| | $ | 18.81 |
| |
| Low | 24.96 |
| | 20.01 |
| | 14.52 |
| | 13.04 |
| |
| Year Ended December 31, 2016 | | | | | | | | |
| Net sales | $ | 869,399 |
| | $ | 957,276 |
| | $ | 1,795,575 |
| | $ | 1,834,400 |
| |
| Cost of sales | | 449,456 |
| | 518,679 |
| | 795,130 |
| | 760,527 |
|
| Gross profit | 388,671 |
| | 433,567 |
| | 870,765 |
| | 861,388 |
| 239,790 |
| | 341,384 |
| | 686,427 |
| | 713,178 |
|
| Advertising and promotion expenses | 86,943 |
| | 94,771 |
| | 202,900 |
| | 250,333 |
| 69,465 |
| | 84,489 |
| | 170,379 |
| | 227,184 |
|
| Other selling and administrative expenses | 350,874 |
| | 350,456 |
| | 350,469 |
| | 348,412 |
| 297,336 |
| | 308,311 |
| | 365,961 |
| | 418,414 |
|
| Operating (loss) income | (49,146 | ) | | (11,660 | ) | | 317,396 |
| | 262,643 |
| (127,011 | ) | | (51,416 | ) | | 150,087 |
| | 67,580 |
|
| (Loss) income before income taxes | (93,479 | ) | | (29,752 | ) | | 294,028 |
| | 238,945 |
| (173,601 | ) | | (95,824 | ) | | 101,955 |
| | 9,182 |
|
| Net (loss) income (a) | (72,959 | ) | | (19,114 | ) | | 236,250 |
| | 173,845 |
| (176,296 | ) | | (107,987 | ) | | 70,596 |
| | 175 |
|
| Net (loss) income per common share—basic | $ | (0.21 | ) | | $ | (0.06 | ) | | $ | 0.69 |
| | $ | 0.51 |
| |
| Net (loss) income (a) per common share - basic | | $ | (0.51 | ) | | $ | (0.31 | ) | | $ | 0.20 |
| | $ | 0.00 |
|
| Weighted average number of common shares | 340,369 |
| | 340,926 |
| | 341,961 |
| | 342,653 |
| 345,852 |
| | 345,941 |
| | 346,698 |
| | 346,727 |
|
| Net (loss) income per common share—diluted | $ | (0.21 | ) | | $ | (0.06 | ) | | $ | 0.68 |
| | $ | 0.50 |
| |
| Net (loss) income per common share - diluted | | $ | (0.51 | ) | | $ | (0.31 | ) | | $ | 0.20 |
| | $ | 0.00 |
|
| Weighted average number of common and potential common shares | 340,369 |
| | 340,926 |
| | 344,226 |
| | 344,996 |
| 345,852 |
| | 345,941 |
| | 348,487 |
| | 348,268 |
|
| Dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.38 |
| | $ | 0.38 |
| | $ | 0.38 |
| | $ | 0.38 |
| |
| Common stock market price: | | | | | | | | |
| High | $ | 33.62 |
| | $ | 34.26 |
| | $ | 34.12 |
| | $ | 33.09 |
| |
| Low | 24.87 |
| | 28.89 |
| | 30.28 |
| | 27.55 |
| |
| |
(a) | Net losses in the first and second quarters of 2017 included net discrete tax expense of $0.5 million and net discrete tax benefits of $3.2 million, respectively, primarily related to reassessments of prior years’ tax liabilities based on the status of audits and tax filings in various jurisdictions around the world, settlements, and enacted law changes. Net loss in the third quarter of 2017 included net discrete tax expense of $561.9 million, primarily related to the establishment of a valuation allowance. Net loss in the fourth quarter of 2017 included a net discrete tax benefit of $104.4 million primarily related to reassessments of prior years’ tax liabilities based on the status of audits and tax filings in various jurisdictions around the world, settlements, and enacted law changes. Net loss for the first and second quarters of 2016 included net discrete tax expense of $0.2 million and net discrete tax benefits of $4.0 million, respectively, primarily related to reassessments of prior years’ tax liabilities based on the status of audits and tax filings in various jurisdictions around the world, settlements, and enacted law changes. Net income for the third and fourth quarters of 2016 included net discrete tax benefits of $9.0 million and $4.0 million, respectively, primarily related to reassessments of prior years’ tax liabilities based on the status of audits and tax filings in various jurisdictions around the world, settlements, and enacted tax law changes and the adoption of a new accounting pronouncement. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | First Quarter | | Second Quarter | | Third Quarter | | Fourth Quarter |
| | (In thousands, except per share amounts) |
| Year Ended December 31, 2018 | |
| Net sales | $ | 708,372 |
| | $ | 844,706 |
| | $ | 1,437,451 |
| | $ | 1,524,281 |
|
| Cost of sales | 489,499 |
| | 587,546 |
| | 824,395 |
| | 814,687 |
|
| Gross profit | 218,873 |
| | 257,160 |
| | 613,056 |
| | 709,594 |
|
| Advertising and promotion expenses | 70,837 |
| | 82,393 |
| | 165,308 |
| | 205,750 |
|
| Other selling and administrative expenses | 424,617 |
| | 360,000 |
| | 325,874 |
| | 398,253 |
|
| Operating (loss) income | (276,581 | ) | | (185,233 | ) | | 121,874 |
| | 105,591 |
|
| (Loss) income before income taxes | (313,905 | ) | | (230,064 | ) | | 72,592 |
| | 54,274 |
|
| Net (loss) income (a) | (311,253 | ) | | (237,963 | ) | | 6,278 |
| | 9,639 |
|
| Net (loss) income (a) per common share - basic | $ | (0.90 | ) | | $ | (0.69 | ) | | $ | 0.02 |
| | $ | 0.03 |
|
| Weighted average number of common shares | 344,434 |
| | 344,584 |
| | 345,285 |
| | 345,720 |
|
| Net (loss) income (a) per common share - diluted | $ | (0.90 | ) | | $ | (0.69 | ) | | $ | 0.02 |
| | $ | 0.03 |
|
| Weighted average number of common and potential common shares | 344,434 |
| | 344,584 |
| | 345,672 |
| | 345,846 |
|
Note 17—Subsequent Event
On February 13, 2018, the Los Angeles County Superior Court granted Mattel’s summary judgment motion on the grounds that the complaint filed by MGA in January 2014 is barred by the statute of limitations. Consistent with this ruling, Mattel anticipates that the Court will enter a final judgment for Mattel. MGA can seek to appeal such a judgment to the California Court of Appeal. In light of the Court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of Mattel, however, Mattel does not presently believe that damages in any amount are reasonably possible. Accordingly, no liability has been accrued to date. For additional information, see "Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Commitments and Contingencies."
| |
| Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. |
None.
| |
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures. |
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of December 31, 2017,2019, Mattel’s disclosure controls and procedures were evaluated, with the participation of Mattel’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to assess whether they are effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by Mattel in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and to provide reasonable assurance that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. Based on this evaluation, Margaret H. Georgiadis,Ynon Kreiz, Mattel’s principal executive officer, and Joseph J. Euteneuer, Mattel’s principal financial officer, concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance as of December 31, 2017.2019.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The report called for by Item 308(a) of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference to Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, included in Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this report.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The report called for by Item 308(b) of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference to Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, included in Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this report.
Remediation of Previously Identified Material Weakness
Management has concluded that the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described in Part II, Item 9A, “Control and Procedures”, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2018 has been remediated as of December 31, 2019. As described in our Form 10-K/A, management developed and designed more robust procedures relating to disclosure committee controls and procedures. Management has evaluated these enhanced controls and has concluded they are designed and operating effectively.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There waswere no changechanges in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this reportquarter ended December 31, 2019 that hashave materially affected, or isare reasonably likely to materially affect, ourMattel’s internal control over financial reporting.
| |
| Item 9B. | Other Information. |
None.
PART III
| |
| Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance. |
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference to sections entitled "Proposal 1—Election of Directors"; "Corporate Governance at Mattel—Board General Information—Board Committees—Audit Committee"; "Executive Officers and Executive Compensation—Executive Officers"; and, to the extent applicable, "Stock Ownership and Reporting —Section—Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance"Reports" in the Mattel 20182020 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC within 120 days afterof December 31, 20172019 (the "Proxy Statement").
Mattel has adopted the Mattel Code of Conduct (the "Code of Conduct"), which satisfies the listing rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC ("Nasdaq") regarding "code of conduct" and satisfies the SEC rules regarding disclosure of a "code of ethics" for the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller. The Code of Conduct is publicly available on Mattel’s corporate website at http://corporate.mattel.com, and the text of the Code of Conduct will be updated on the website to reflect any amendment. A copy may also be obtained free of charge by mailing a request in writing to: Secretary, Mail Stop M1-1516, Mattel, Inc., 333 Continental Blvd., El Segundo, CACalifornia 90245-5012. If Mattel grants any waiver from a provision of the Code of Conduct for any executive officer or director, or makes any substantive amendment to the SEC-mandated "code of ethics" that applies to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or Controller, Mattel will make disclosures to the extent required by applicable laws, regulations and stock exchange listing standards on its corporate website or in a Current Report on Form 8-K. Mattel has posted the Board of Directors’ corporate governance guidelines and the charters of its Audit, Compensation and Governance and Social Responsibility Committees of the Board of Directors on its corporate website at http://corporate.mattel.com. Copies of the corporate governance guidelines and committee charters may be obtained free of charge by mailing a request to the address noted above.
Mattel has filed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302 certifications of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as Exhibit 31.0 and Exhibit 31.1 hereto, respectively.
| |
| Item 11. | Executive Compensation. |
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference to sections entitled "Executive Officers and Executive Compensation" and "Corporate Governance at Mattel—Board General Information—Board Committees—Compensation Committee" in the Proxy Statement.
| |
| Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. |
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled "Stock Ownership and Reporting" in the Proxy Statement.
| |
| Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence. |
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference to sections entitled "Audit and Related Party Matters—Certain Transactions with Related Persons" and "Corporate Governance at Mattel—Corporate Governance Standards and Practices—Board Independence Determination" in the Proxy Statement.
| |
| Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services. |
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled "Audit and Related Party Matters—Fees Incurred for Services by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP" in the Proxy Statement.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, and Financial Statement Schedules.
| |
| (a) | The following documents are filed as part of this report: |
The following financial statements are filed as part of this report under Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."
2. Financial Statement Schedule for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 | |
2. | Financial Statement Schedule for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 |
Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Allowances
All other financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto. See Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."
3. Exhibits (Listed by numbers corresponding to Item 601 of Regulation S-K) | |
| 3. | Exhibits (Listed by numbers corresponding to Item 601 of Regulation S-K) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File No. | | Exhibit(s) | | Filing Date |
| | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Mattel, Inc. | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 99.0 | | May 21, 2007 |
| | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mattel, Inc. | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 3.1 | | January 30, 2017 |
| | Specimen Stock Certificate with respect to Mattel, Inc.’s Common Stock | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 4.0 | | August 3, 2007 |
| | Indenture, dated as of September 23, 2010, between Mattel, Inc. and Union Bank, N.A. relating to Senior Debt Securities | | S-3ASR | | 333-169539 | | 4.1 | | September 23, 2010 |
| | Indenture, dated as of December 20, 2017, by and among the Issuer, the guarantors named therein, and MUFG Union Bank, N.A., National Association, as Trustee. | | 8-K | | 00105647 | | 4.1 | | December 21, 2017 |
| | Form of 4.350% Notes due 2020 | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 4.1 | | September 28, 2010 |
| | Form of 6.200% Notes due 2040 | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 4.2 | | September 28, 2010 |
| | Form of 5.450% Notes due 2041 | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 4.2 | | November 8, 2011 |
| | Form of 1.700% Notes due 2018 | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 4.1 | | March 7, 2013 |
| | Form of 3.150% Notes due 2023 | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 4.2 | | March 7, 2013 |
| | Form of 2.350% Notes due 2019 | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 4.1 | | May 6, 2014 |
| | Form of 2.350% Notes due 2021 | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 4.1 | | August 5, 2016 |
| | Form of 6.750% Senior Notes due 2025 | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 4.1 | | December 21, 2017 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File No. | | Exhibit(s) | | Filing Date |
| | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Mattel, Inc. | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 99.0 | | May 21, 2007 |
| | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mattel, Inc. | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 3.1 | | August 28, 2018 |
| | Description of Registrant's Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | | | | | | | | |
| | Specimen Stock Certificate with respect to Mattel, Inc.’s Common Stock | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 4.0 | | August 3, 2007 |
| | Indenture, dated as of September 23, 2010, between Mattel, Inc. and Union Bank, N.A. relating to Senior Debt Securities | | S-3ASR | | 333-169539 | | 4.1 | | September 23, 2010 |
| | Indenture, dated as of December 20, 2017, by and among the Issuer, the guarantors named therein, and MUFG Union Bank, N.A., National Association, as Trustee | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 4.1 | | December 21, 2017 |
| | First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 31, 2018, by and among the Issuer, the guarantors named therein, and MUFG Union Bank, N.A., as Trustee | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 4.1 | | June 1, 2018 |
| | Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 14, 2018, by and among the Company, the guarantors named therein, and MUFG Union Bank, N.A., as Trustee | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 4.1 | | December 19, 2018 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File No. | | Exhibit(s) | | Filing Date |
| | Seventh Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 8, 2015, by and among Mattel, Inc., as Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Runners, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and Citibank N.A., as Co-Syndication Agents, Mizuho Bank, Ltd., MUFG Union Bank, N.A., and Royal Bank of Canada, as Co-Documentation Agents, and the other financial institutions party thereto | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | June 9, 2015 |
| | Amendment No. 1 to Seventh Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 8, 2015, by and among Mattel, Inc., as Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Citibank N.A., as Co-Syndication Agents, Mizuho Bank, Ltd., MUFG Union Bank, N.A., and Royal Bank of Canada, as Co-Documentation Agents, and the other financial institutions party thereto | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | June 16, 2017 |
| | Amendment No. 2 to Seventh Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 8, 2015, by and among Mattel, Inc., as Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Citibank N.A., as Co-Syndication Agents, Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd., MUFG Union Bank, N.A., and Royal Bank of Canada, as Co-Documentation Agents, and the other financial institutions party thereto | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | September 21, 2017 |
| | Syndicated Facility Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2017, by and among the Borrower, as U.S. Revolving Borrower, the other borrowers party thereto, the guarantors party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Global Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent and Australian Security Trustee, and Citibank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Joint Lead Arrangers, Joint Bookrunners and Co-Syndication Agents, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Mizuho Bank, Ltd., MUFG Union Bank, N.A. and Royal Bank of Canada, as Joint Lead Arrangers, Joint Bookrunners and Co-Documentation Agents, and the other financial institutions party thereto | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | December 21, 2017 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Peter D. Gibbons, dated March 28, 2013, regarding an offer of employment for the position of EVP, Global Operations | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.2 | | April 22, 2013 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Richard Dickson dated May 16, 2014 regarding an offer of employment for the position of Chief Brands Officer | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.2 | | July 29, 2014 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File No. | | Exhibit(s) | | Filing Date |
| | Indenture, dated as of November 20, 2019, by and among the Issuer, the guarantors named therein, and MUFG Union Bank, N.A., National Association, as Trustee | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 4.1 | | November 20, 2019 |
| | Form of 6.200% Notes due 2040 | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 4.2 | | September 28, 2010 |
| | Form of 5.450% Notes due 2041 | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 4.2 | | November 8, 2011 |
| | Form of 3.150% Notes due 2023 | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 4.2 | | March 7, 2013 |
| | Form of 6.750% Senior Notes due 2025 | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 4.1 | | December 21, 2017 |
| | Form of 5.875% Senior Notes due 2027 | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 4.2 | | November 20, 2019 |
| | Seventh Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 8, 2015, by and among Mattel, Inc., as Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Runners, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and Citibank N.A., as Co-Syndication Agents, Mizuho Bank, Ltd., MUFG Union Bank, N.A., and Royal Bank of Canada, as Co-Documentation Agents, and the other financial institutions party thereto. | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | June 9, 2015 |
| | Amendment No. 1 to Seventh Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 8, 2015, by and among Mattel, Inc., as Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Citibank N.A., as Co-Syndication Agents, Mizuho Bank, Ltd., MUFG Union Bank, N.A., and Royal Bank of Canada, as Co-Documentation Agents, and the other financial institutions party thereto. | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | June 16, 2017 |
| | Amendment No. 2 to Seventh Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 8, 2015, by and among Mattel, Inc., as Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Citibank N.A., as Co-Syndication Agents, Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd., MUFG Union Bank, N.A., and Royal Bank of Canada, as Co-Documentation Agents, and the other financial institutions party thereto. | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | September 21, 2017 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File No. | | Exhibit(s) | | Filing Date |
| | Syndicated Facility Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2017, by and among the Borrower, as U.S. Revolving Borrower, the other borrowers party thereto, the guarantors party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Global Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent and Australian Security Trustee, and Citibank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Joint Lead Arrangers, Joint Bookrunners and Co-Syndication Agents, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Mizuho Bank, Ltd., MUFG Union Bank, N.A. and Royal Bank of Canada, as Joint Lead Arrangers, Joint Bookrunners and Co-Documentation Agents, and the other financial institutions party thereto. | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | December 21, 2017 |
| | Foreign Joinder Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2018, by and among Mattel France, each of the French Revolving Lenders party thereto, Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited, in its capacity as French Swingline Lender and Bank of America, N.A., in its capacity as Global Administrative Agent under the Syndicated Facility Agreement dated as of December 20, 2017, among Mattel, Inc., each of the other borrowers and guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Global Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent and Australian Security Trustee, and the other parties thereto. | | 8-K
| | 001-05647 | | 99.1 | | April 3, 2018 |
| | Foreign Joinder Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2018, by and among Mattel España, S.A., each of the Spanish Revolving Lenders party thereto, Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited, in its capacity as Spanish Swingline Lender and Bank of America, N.A., in its capacity as Global Administrative Agent under the Syndicated Facility Agreement dated as of December 20, 2017, among Mattel, Inc., each of the other borrowers and guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Global Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent and Australian Security Trustee, and the other parties thereto. | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 99.2 | | April 3, 2018 |
| | Foreign Joinder Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2018, by and among Mattel Europa B.V., Mattel U.K. Limited, HIT Entertainment Limited, Gullane (Thomas) Limited, Mattel GMBH, each of the European (GNU) Subsidiary Guarantors party thereto, each of the European (GNU) Revolving Lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., in its capacity as European (GNU) Swingline Lender and its capacity as Global Administrative Agent under the Syndicated Facility Agreement dated as of December 20, 2017, among Mattel, Inc., each of the other borrowers and guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Global Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent and Australian Security Trustee, and the other parties thereto. | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 99.3 | | April 3, 2018 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File No. | | Exhibit(s) | | Filing Date |
| | Foreign Joinder Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2018, by and among Mattel Pty Ltd., each of the Australian Revolving Lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A. (acting through its Australia branch), in its capacity as Australian Swingline Lender and Bank of America, N.A., in its capacity as Global Administrative Agent under the Syndicated Facility Agreement dated as of December 20, 2017, among Mattel, Inc., each of the other borrowers and guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Global Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent and Australian Security Trustee, and the other parties thereto. | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 99.4 | | April 3, 2018 |
| | First Amendment to Syndicated Facility Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2018, by and among Mattel, Inc., each of the other borrowers and guarantors party thereto, the lenders signatory thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent and Australian Security Trustee | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | June 1, 2018 |
| | Second Amendment to Syndicated Facility Agreement, dated as of December 14, 2018, by and among the Company, each of the other borrowers and guarantors party thereto, the lenders signatory thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent and Australian Security Trustee | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | December 19, 2018 |
| | Third Amendment to Syndicated Facility Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2019, by and among the Company, each of the other borrowers and guarantors party thereto, the lenders signatory thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent and Australian Security Trustee | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | November 20, 2019 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Richard Dickson dated May 16, 2014 regarding an offer of employment for the position of Chief Brands Officer | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.2 | | July 29, 2014 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Christopher A. Sinclair, dated February 19, 2015, regarding an offer of employment for the position of Interim Chief Executive Officer | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.3 | | April 28, 2015 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Joseph B. Johnson, dated March 11, 2015, regarding an offer of employment for the position of SVP and Corporate Controller | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | May 4, 2015 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Christopher A. Sinclair, dated April 15, 2015, regarding an offer of employment for the position of Chief Executive Officer | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.4 | | July 28, 2015 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Margaret H. Georgiadis, dated January 11, 2017, regarding an offer of employment for the position of Chief Executive Officer | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | January 17, 2017 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File No. | | Exhibit(s) | | Filing Date |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Christopher A. Sinclair, dated February 19, 2015, regarding an offer of employment for the position of Interim Chief Executive Officer | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.3 | | April 28, 2015 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Bryan G. Stockton, dated March 3, 2015, regarding Mr. Stockton's separation from Mattel | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.2 | | April 28, 2015 |
| | Consulting Agreement, by and between Mattel, Inc. and Bryan G. Stockton, dated March 10, 2015 | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | March 16, 2015 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Joseph B. Johnson, dated March 11, 2015, regarding an offer of employment for the position of SVP and Corporate Controller | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | May 4, 2015 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Christopher A. Sinclair, dated April 15, 2015, regarding an offer of employment for the position of Chief Executive Officer | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.4 | | July 28, 2015 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Geoffrey H. Walker, dated June 29, 2015, regarding Mr. Walker's promotion to EVP, Commercial - North America | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.2 | | October 27, 2015 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Juliana Chugg, dated August 25, 2015, regarding an offer of employment for the position of EVP & Chief Brands Officer -
Core Brands
| | 10-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.12 | | February 23, 2017 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Margaret H. Georgiadis, dated January 11, 2017, regarding an offer of employment for the position of Chief Executive Officer | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | January 17, 2017 |
| | Participation Letter Agreement under the Mattel, Inc. Executive Severance Plan B between Mattel, Inc. and Margaret H. Georgiadis, dated January 11, 2017 | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.2 | | January 17, 2017 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Kevin M. Farr, dated August 16, 2017, regarding his separation from Mattel | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | August 18, 2017 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Joseph J. Euteneuer, dated September 25, 2017, regarding an offer of employment for the position of Chief Financial Officer | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | October 3, 2017 |
| | Participation Letter Agreement under the Mattel, Inc. Executive Severance Plan B between Mattel, Inc. and Joseph J. Euteneuer, dated September 25, 2017 | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.2 | | October 3, 2017 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Joseph J. Euteneuer, dated June 12, 2018, regarding change in allocation of Mr. Euteneuer's long-term incentive grant value | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.9 | | July 25, 2018 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Amanda Thompson, dated August 23, 2017, regarding an offer of employment for the position of EVP and Chief People Officer
| | 10-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.20 | | February 22, 2019 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Ynon Kreiz, dated April 19, 2018, regarding an offer of employment for the position of Chief Executive Officer | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | April 20, 2018 |
| | Participation Letter Agreement under the Mattel, Inc. Executive Severance Plan B between Mattel, Inc. and Ynon Kreiz, dated April 19, 2018 | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.2 | | April 20, 2018 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Ynon Kreiz, dated June 12, 2018, regarding change in allocation of Mr. Kreiz’s long-term incentive grant value | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.8 | | July 25, 2018 |
| | Fixed Term Employment Agreement between Mattel Northern Europe A/S and Soren T. Laursen, dated October 8, 2018 | | 10-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.24 | | February 22, 2019 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel and Yoon Hugh, dated April 15, 2019, regarding an offer of employment for the position of Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | April 19, 2019 |
| | Mattel Incentive Plan | | DEF 14A | | 001-05647 | | Appendix A | | April 5, 2017
|
| | Mattel, Inc. Deferred Compensation and PIP Excess Plan | | S-8 | | 333-89458 | | 4.1 | | May 31, 2002 |
| | Mattel, Inc. Deferred Compensation and PIP Excess Plan (Post-2004)(the "DCPEP") | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | October 24, 2008 |
| | Amendment No. 1 to the DCPEP | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.2 | | October 24, 2013 |
| | Amendment No. 2 to the DCPEP | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.3 | | October 24, 2013 |
| | Amendment No. 3 to the DCPEP | | 10-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.19 | | February 25, 2016 |
| | Mattel, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009) | | 10-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.35 | | February 26, 2009 |
| | Amendment No. 1 to the Mattel, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.4 | | October 24, 2013 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File No. | | Exhibit(s) | | Filing Date |
| | Amendment No. 3 to the DCPEP | | 10-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.19 | | February 25, 2016 |
| | Mattel, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009) | | 10-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.35 | | February 26, 2009 |
| | Amendment No. 1 to the Mattel, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.4 | | October 24, 2013 |
| | Mattel, Inc. 2005 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009) | | 10-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.36 | | February 26, 2009 |
| | Amendment No. 1 to the Mattel, Inc. 2005 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.5 | | October 24, 2013 |
| | Mattel, Inc. Executive Severance Plan (effective June 30, 2009) (the "Executive Severance Plan") | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.4 | | July 2, 2009 |
| | Amendment No. 1 to the Executive Severance Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.6 | | October 24, 2013 |
| | Mattel, Inc. Executive Severance Plan B (effective July 1, 2014) (the "Executive Severance Plan B" and collectively with the Executive Severance Plan, the "Executive Severance Plans") | | 8-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | July 21, 2014 |
| | The Mattel Cash Balance Excess Benefit Plan (as amended and restated, effective July 1, 2012) | | 10-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.10 | | February 26, 2013 |
| | Amendment No. 1 to the Mattel Cash Balance Excess Benefit Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.7 | | October 24, 2013 |
| | Mattel, Inc. Personal Investment Plan (amended and restated as of January 1, 2013) (the "PIP") | | 10-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.11 | | February 26, 2013 |
| | Amendment One to the PIP | | 10-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.21 | | February 26, 2014 |
| | Amendment Two to the PIP | | 10-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.22 | | February 25, 2015 |
| | Amendment Three to the PIP | | 10-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.23 | | February 25, 2015 |
| | Amendment Four and Merger Agreement for the PIP and the MEGA Brands America, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan | | 10-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.24 | | February 25, 2015 |
| | Amendment Five to the PIP | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.6 | | July 28, 2015 |
| | Amendment Six to the PIP | | 10-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.35 | | February 23, 2017 |
| | Mattel, Inc. 2005 Equity Compensation Plan (the "2005 Plan") | | DEF 14A | | 001-05647 | | Appendix C | | April 13, 2005 |
| | Amendment No. 1 to the 2005 Plan | | 10-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.76 | | February 26, 2009 |
| | Amendment No. 2 to the 2005 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | April 29, 2009 |
| | Amendment No. 3 to the 2005 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.8 | | October 24, 2013 |
| | Mattel, Inc. 2010 Equity and Long-Term Compensation Plan (the "2010 Plan") | | DEF 14A | | 001-05647 | | Appendix A | | March 30, 2010 |
| | Amendment No. 1 to the 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.9 | | October 24, 2013 |
| | Mattel, Inc. Amended and Restated 2010 Equity and Long-Term Compensation Plan (the "Amended 2010 Plan") | | DEF 14A | | 001-05647 | | Appendix A | | April 9, 2015 |
| | First Amendment to the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | July 25, 2018 |
| | Second Amendment to the Amended 2010 Plan
| | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | July 26, 2019 |
| | Third Amendment to the Amended 2010 Plan
| | | | | | | | |
| | Form of Notice of Grant and Grant Agreement for grants of NQSOs to employees under the 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | October 27, 2010 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File No. | | Exhibit(s) | | Filing Date |
| | Form of Notice of Grant and Grant Agreement for grants of RSUs to employees under the 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.2 | | October 27, 2010 |
| | Form of Grant Agreement for grants of Long-Term Incentive Program performance-based RSUs ("Performance Units") under the 2010 Plan to certain Executive Officers with employment agreements and participants in the Executive Severance Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | April 27, 2011 |
| | Form of Grant Agreement for grants of Performance Units to senior executives under the 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.2 | | April 27, 2011 |
| | Form of Notice of Grant and Grant Agreement for grants of NQSOs to certain Executive Officers with employment agreements under the 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.5 | | October 27, 2010 |
| | Form of Notice of Grant and Grant Agreement for grants of NQSOs to participants in the Executive Severance Plan under the 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.6 | | October 27, 2010 |
| | Form of Grant Agreement for grants of RSUs to participants in the Executive Severance Plan under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.4 | | October 27, 2015 |
| | Form of Grant Agreement for grants of RSUs to participants in the Executive Severance Plan B under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.5 | | October 27, 2015 |
| | Form of Grant Agreement for grants of RSUs to employees under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.6 | | October 27, 2015 |
| | Form of Grant Agreement for grants of NQSOs to participants in the Executive Severance Plan under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.7 | | October 27, 2015 |
| | Form of Grant Agreement for grants of NQSOs to participants in the Executive Severance Plan B under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.8 | | October 27, 2015 |
| | Form of Grant Agreement for grants of NQSOs to employees under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.9 | | October 27, 2015 |
| | Form of Grant Agreement for grants of Performance Units to participants in the Executive Severance Plans under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | April 28, 2016 |
| | Form of Grant Agreement for grants of Performance Units to senior executives under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.2 | | April 28, 2016 |
| | Form of Grant Agreement for grants of RSUs to Non-Employee Directors under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.1 | | July 28, 2016 |
| | Notice of Grant and Grant Agreement for February 8, 2017 make-whole grant of RSUs to Margaret H. Georgiadis under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.64 | | February 23, 2017 |
| | Notice of Grant and Grant Agreement for February 8, 2017 new-hire grant of RSUs to Margaret H. Georgiadis under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.65 | | February 23, 2017 |
| | Notice of Grant and Grant Agreement for February 8, 2017 new-hire grant of NQSOs to Margaret H. Georgiadis under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-K | | 001-05647 | | 10.66 | | February 23, 2017 |
| | Form of Grant Agreement as of March 20, 2017 for grants of Performance Units to senior executives under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.6 | | April 27, 2017 |
| | Form of Grant Agreement as of March 20, 2017 for grants of Performance Units to participants in the Mattel, Inc. Executive Severance Plan under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.7 | | April 27, 2017 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File No. | | Exhibit(s) | | Filing Date |
| | Form of Grant Agreement as of March 20, 2017 for grants of Performance Units to senior executives under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.6 | | April 27, 2017 |
| | Form of Grant Agreement as of March 20, 2017 for grants of Performance Units to participants in the Mattel, Inc. Executive Severance Plan under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.7 | | April 27, 2017 |
| | Form of Grant Agreement as of March 20, 2017 for grants of Performance Units to participants in the Mattel, Inc. Executive Severance Plan B under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.8 | | April 27, 2017 |
| | Grant Agreement for March 20, 2017 grant of Performance Units to Christopher A. Sinclair under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.9 | | April 27, 2017 |
| | Grant Agreement for March 20, 2017 grant of Performance Units to Margaret H. Georgiadis under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.10 | | April 27, 2017 |
| | ComputationGrant Agreement for April 30, 2018 grant of Earningsperformance-based non-qualified Stock Options to Fixed ChargesYnon Kreiz under the Mattel, Inc. Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.4 | | July 25, 2018 |
| | Form of Grant Agreement as of April 5, 2018 for grants of Long-Term Incentive Program performance-based restricted stock units (“Performance Units”) to senior executives under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.5 | | July 25, 2018 |
| | Form of Grant Agreement as of April 5, 2018 for grants of Performance Units to participants in the Mattel, Inc. Executive Severance Plan under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.6 | | July 25, 2018 |
| | Form of Grant Agreement as of April 5, 2018 for grants of Performance Units to participants in the Mattel, Inc. Executive Severance Plan B under the Amended 2010 Plan | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.7 | | July 25, 2018 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Ynon Kreiz, dated June 12, 2018, regarding change in allocation of Mr. Kreiz’s long-term incentive grant value | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.8 | | July 25, 2018 |
| | Letter Agreement between Mattel, Inc. and Joseph J. Euteneuer, dated June 12, 2018, regarding change in allocation of Mr. Euteneuer’s long-term incentive grant value | | 10-Q | | 001-05647 | | 10.9 | | July 25, 2018 |
| | Subsidiaries of the Registrant as of December 31, 2019 | | | | | | | | |
| | Subsidiaries of the Registrant as of December 31, 2017 | | | | | | | | |
| | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | | | | | | | | |
24.0* | | Power of Attorney (on(see signature page 118 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K) | | | | | | | | |
| | Certification of Principal Executive Officer dated February 27, 201821, 2020 pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | |
| | Certification of Principal Financial Officer dated February 27, 201821, 2020 pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | |
| | Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer dated February 27, 2018,21, 2020, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | |
| 101.INS* | | Inline XBRL Instance Document | | | | | | | | |
| 101.SCH* | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Incorporated by Reference |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File No. | | Exhibit(s) | | Filing Date |
| 101.CAL* | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | |
| 101.DEF* | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | |
| 101.LAB* | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | |
| 101.PRE* | | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | |
104*
| | The cover page from Mattel's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, formatted in Inline XBRL. (embedded within the Inline XBRL Document) | | | | | | | | |
+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
* Filed herewith.
** Furnished herewith. This exhibit should not be deemed to be "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act.
Mattel has not filed certain long-term debt instruments under which the principal amount of securities authorized to be issued does not exceed 10% of its total assets. Copies of such agreements will be provided to the SEC upon request.
(b) Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K
See Item (a)(3) above.
(c) Financial Statement Schedule
See Item (a)(2) above.
Copies of this Annual Report on Form 10-K (including Exhibit 24.0) and Exhibits 12.0, 21.0, 23.0, 31.0, 31.1, and 32.0 are available to stockholders of Mattel without charge. Written requests should be sent to: Secretary, Mail Stop M1-1516, Mattel, Inc., 333 Continental Blvd., El Segundo, California 90245-5012.
| |
| Item 16. | Form 10-K Summary. |
None.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
| | MATTEL, INC. Registrant |
| | By: | | /s/ JOSEPH J. EUTENEUER JOSEPH J. EUTENEUER |
| | | | Joseph J. Euteneuer Chief Financial Officer |
Date: February 27, 201825, 2020
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, the undersigned directors and officers of Mattel, Inc., do hereby severally constitute and appoint Robert Normile, Tiffani L. Magri, and Margaret H. Georgiadis,Ynon Kreiz, and each of them, our true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, each with full powers of substitution, to do any and all acts and things in our name and behalf in our capacities as directors and officers and to execute any and all instruments for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, which said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable to enable Mattel, Inc. to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including specifically, but without limitation, power and authority to sign for us or any of us, in our names in the capacities indicated below, any and all amendments hereto; and we do each hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or their substitutes, or any one of them, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
| | | | |
| Signature | | Title | | Date |
| | | |
/S/ MARGARET H. GEORGIADIS s/ YNON KREIZ | | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Director (principal(principal executive officer)
| | February 27, 201825, 2020 |
Margaret H. GeorgiadisYnon Kreiz | | | |
| | | | | |
/S/ JOSEPH J. EUTENEUER S/ JOSEPH J. EUTENEUER | | Chief Financial Officer (principal (principal financial officer)
| | February 27, 201825, 2020 |
Joseph J. Euteneuer
| | | |
| | | | | |
/S/ JOSEPH B. JOHNSON S/ YOON HUGH | | Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller (principal accounting officer) | | February 27, 201825, 2020 |
Joseph B. JohnsonYoon Hugh | | | |
| | | | | |
/S/ CHRISTOPHER A. SINCLAIR S/ RICHARD T. BRADLEY | | Executive Chairman of the BoardDirector | | February 27, 201825, 2020 |
Christopher A. SinclairRichard T. Bradley | | | |
| | | | | |
/S/ MICHAEL J. DOLAN S/ ADRIANA CISNEROS | | Director | | February 27, 201825, 2020 |
| Adriana Cisneros | | | |
| | | | |
| /S/ MICHAEL J. DOLAN | | Director | | February 25, 2020 |
| Michael J. Dolan | | | |
| | | | | |
/S/ TREVOR A. EDWARDS s/ SOREN LAURSEN | | Director | | February 27, 201825, 2020 |
Trevor A. EdwardsSoren Laursen | | | |
| | | | | |
/S/ DR. FRANCES D. FERGUSSON S/ ANN LEWNES | | Director | | February 27, 2018 |
Dr. Frances D. Fergusson | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ YNON KREIZ
| | Director | | February 27, 2018 |
Ynon Kreiz | | | |
| | | | |
/S/ ANN LEWNES
| | Director | | February 27, 201825, 2020 |
| Ann Lewnes | | | |
| | | | | |
/S/ DOMINIC NG S/ ROGER LYNCH | | Director | | February 27, 201825, 2020 |
| Roger Lynch | | | |
| | | | |
| /S/ DOMINIC NG | | Director | | February 25, 2020 |
| Dominic Ng | | | |
| | | | | |
/S/ VASANT M. PRABHU S/ JUDY D. OLIAN | | Director | | February 27, 201825, 2020 |
| Judy D. Olian | | | |
| | | | |
| /S/ VASANT M. PRABHU | | Director | | February 25, 2020 |
| Vasant M. Prabhu | | | |
| | | | | |
/S/ DEAN A. SCARBOROUGH
| | Director | | February 27, 2018 |
Dean A. Scarborough | | | |
| | | | |
/S/ KATHY WHITE LOYD
| | Director | | February 27, 2018 |
Kathy White Loyd | | | |
| | | | |
SCHEDULE II
MATTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND ALLOWANCES
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Balance at Beginning of Year | | Additions Charged to Operations | | Net Deductions and Other | | Balance at End of Year |
| | (In thousands) |
| Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2017 | $ | 21,376 |
| | $ | 17,568 |
|
| $ | (13,566 | ) | (a) | $ | 25,378 |
|
| Year Ended December 31, 2016 | $ | 24,370 |
| | $ | 9,165 |
|
| $ | (12,159 | ) | (a) | $ | 21,376 |
|
| Year Ended December 31, 2015 | $ | 26,283 |
| | $ | 5,813 |
| | $ | (7,726 | ) | (a) | $ | 24,370 |
|
| Allowance for Obsolescence: | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2017 | $ | 36,776 |
| | $ | 127,592 |
|
| $ | (45,922 | ) | (b) | $ | 118,446 |
|
| Year Ended December 31, 2016 | $ | 45,715 |
| | $ | 31,455 |
|
| $ | (40,394 | ) | (b) | $ | 36,776 |
|
| Year Ended December 31, 2015 | $ | 46,899 |
| | $ | 33,305 |
| | $ | (34,489 | ) | (b) | $ | 45,715 |
|
| Income Tax Valuation Allowances: | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2017 | $ | 74,125 |
| | $ | 512,969 |
| (d) | $ | (7,849 | ) | (c) | $ | 579,245 |
|
| Year Ended December 31, 2016 | $ | 77,334 |
| | $ | 15,772 |
|
| $ | (18,981 | ) | (c) | $ | 74,125 |
|
| Year Ended December 31, 2015 | $ | 133,297 |
| | $ | 8,161 |
|
| $ | (64,124 | ) | (c) | $ | 77,334 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Balance at Beginning of Year | | Additions Charged to Operations | | Net Deductions and Other | | Balance at End of Year |
| | (In thousands) |
| Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2019 | $ | 21,958 |
| | $ | 967 |
| | $ | (4,459 | ) | (a) | $ | 18,466 |
|
| Year Ended December 31, 2018 | $ | 25,378 |
| | $ | 40,894 |
| | $ | (44,314 | ) | (a) | $ | 21,958 |
|
| Year Ended December 31, 2017 | $ | 21,376 |
| | $ | 17,568 |
| | $ | (13,566 | ) | (a) | $ | 25,378 |
|
| Income Tax Valuation Allowances: | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2019 | $ | 365,820 |
| | $ | 284,629 |
| (c) | $ | (39,889 | ) | (b) | $ | 610,560 |
|
| Year Ended December 31, 2018 | $ | 580,937 |
| | $ | 103,154 |
| (c) | $ | (318,271 | ) | (b) | $ | 365,820 |
|
| Year Ended December 31, 2017 | $ | 74,125 |
| | $ | 514,661 |
| | $ | (7,849 | ) | (b) | $ | 580,937 |
|
| |
| (a) | Includes write-offs, recoveries of previous write-offs, and currency translation adjustments. |
| |
| (b) | Primarily relates to the disposal of related inventory and raw materials and currency translation adjustments. |
| |
(c) | Primarily represents projected utilization and write-offs of loss carryforwards and certain deferred tax assets for 2019, projected utilization and write-offs of loss carryforwards and certain deferred tax assets for 2018, and projected utilization and write-offs of loss carryforwards and certain deferred tax assets for 2017. |
2017; projected utilization and write-offs of loss carryforwards and certain deferred tax assets for 2016; and projected utilization and write-offs of loss carryforwards for 2015.
| |
(d)(c) | Primarily representsFor the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the additions represent increases related to losses without benefit andbenefit. For the establishment ofyear ended December 31, 2019, the additions also represent an increase related to a valuation allowance in the third quarter of 2017 on U.S. deferred tax assets that will likely not be realized and a provisional estimateon the transfer of the impact of U.S. Tax Reform in the fourth quarter of 2017.intangible asset rights. |
