UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
| | | | | |
| ☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20202023 |
or
| | | | | |
| ☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number: 000-55775001-41951
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | | | | | | | |
| Maryland | | 47-2887436 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
18191 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 300 Irvine, California | | 92612 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (949) 270-9200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Title of each class | | Trading Symbol(s) | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
NoneCommon Stock, $0.01 par value per share | | NoneAHR | | NoneNew York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:Act:
Class T and Class I Common stock,Stock, $0.01 par value per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). x☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ |
| Non-accelerated filer | ☒ | Smaller reporting company | ☐ |
| | Emerging growth company | ☒☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☒ ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)U.S.C.7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No
There isAs of June 30, 2023, there was no established market for the registrant’s common stock. On April 2, 2020,March 15, 2023, the registrant’s board of directors established an updated estimated per share net asset value, or NAV, of the registrant’s common stock of $9.54$31.40 as of December 31, 2019.2022. As of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, there were, approximately 74,707,78919,263,441 shares of Class T common stock and 5,353,73446,439,950 shares of Class I common stock held by non-affiliates, excluding shares owned by officers of American Healthcare Investors, LLC, the registrant’s affiliated co-sponsor, for an aggregate market value of $712,712,000$604,872,000 and $51,075,000,$1,458,214,000, respectively, assuming a market value as of that date of $9.54$31.40 per share.
As of March 12, 2021,15, 2024, there were 76,041,54965,372,222 shares of common stock, 19,552,425 shares of Class T common stock and 5,655,79846,673,320 shares of Class I common stock of Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT, IV, Inc. outstanding.
______________________________________
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None.
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1. Business.
The use of the words “we,” “us” or “our” refers to Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT, IV, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT IV Holdings, LP, except where otherwise noted.
Company
Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT, IV, Inc., a Maryland corporation, invests inis a self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, that acquires, owns and operates a diversified portfolio of clinical healthcare real estate properties, focusing primarily on outpatient medical office buildings, senior housing, skilled nursing facilities, or SNFs, and senior housing facilitiesother healthcare-related facilities. We have built a fully-integrated management platform, with approximately 110 employees, that produce current income. operates clinical healthcare properties throughout the United States, the United Kingdom and the Isle of Man. We also operate healthcare-related facilities utilizing the structure permitted by the REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007, which is commonly referred to as a “RIDEA” structure (the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, authorizing the RIDEA structure were enacted as part of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008). Our healthcare facilities operated under a RIDEA structure include our senior housing operating properties, or SHOP, and our integrated senior health campuses. We qualifiedhave originated and acquired secured loans and may also originate and acquire other real estate-related investments on an infrequent and opportunistic basis. We generally seek investments that produce current income; however, we have selectively developed, and may continue to selectively develop, healthcare real estate properties. We have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or REIT under the Code for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2016,purposes. We believe that we have been organized and operated, and we intend to continue to qualify to be taxedoperate, in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT.REIT under the Code.
We raised $754,118,000 throughOn October 1, 2021, Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc., or GAHR III, merged with and into a best efforts initial public offering,wholly-owned subsidiary, or Merger Sub, of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV, Inc., or GAHR IV, with Merger Sub being the surviving company, which we refer to as the REIT Merger, and our operating partnership, Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV Holdings, LP, merged with and into Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Holdings, LP, or the Surviving Partnership, with the Surviving Partnership being the surviving entity, which we refer to as the Partnership Merger and, together with the REIT Merger, the Merger. Following the Merger on October 1, 2021, our company was renamed American Healthcare REIT, Inc. and the Surviving Partnership was renamed American Healthcare REIT Holdings, LP, or our initial offering, and issued 75,639,681 aggregate sharesoperating partnership.
Also on October 1, 2021, immediately prior to the consummation of our Class T and Class I shares of our common stock. In addition, during our initial offering,the Merger, GAHR III acquired a newly formed entity, American Healthcare Opps Holdings, LLC, which we issued 3,253,535 aggregate shares of our Class T and Class I common stockrefer to as the AHI Acquisition, pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, as amended, or the DRIP, for a total of $31,021,000 in distributions reinvested.contribution and exchange agreement dated June 23, 2021. Following the deregistrationMerger and the AHI Acquisition, our company became self-managed.
See Note 1, Organization and Description of our initial offering, we continued issuing shares of our common stock pursuantBusiness, and Note 4, Business Combinations — 2021 Business Combinations, to the DRIP throughConsolidated Financial Statements that are a subsequent offering, or the 2019 DRIP Offering. We commenced offering shares pursuant to the 2019 DRIP Offeringpart of this Annual Report on March 1, 2019, following the termination of our initial offering on February 15, 2019. On March 18, 2021, our board of directors, or our board, authorized the suspension of the DRIP, effective as of April 1, 2021. See the “Key developments” section belowForm 10-K, for a further discussion of the 2019 DRIP OfferingMerger and the DRIP. As of December 31, 2020, a total of $41,471,000 in distributions were reinvested that resulted in 4,342,059 shares of our common stock being issued pursuant to the 2019 DRIP Offering. We collectively refer to the DRIP portion of our initial offering and the 2019 DRIP Offering as our DRIP Offerings.AHI Acquisition.
Operating Partnership
We conduct substantially all of our operations through Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV Holdings, LP, orour operating partnership, and we are the sole general partner of our operating partnership. We are externally advised by Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV Advisor, LLC, or our advisor, pursuant to an advisory agreement, or the Advisory Agreement, between usAs of both December 31, 2023 and our advisor. The Advisory Agreement was effective as of February 16, 2016 and had a one-year initial term, subject to successive one-year renewals upon the mutual consent2022, we owned approximately 95.0% of the parties. The Advisory Agreement was last renewed pursuant tooperating partnership units, or OP units, in our operating partnership, and the mutual consent of the parties on February 11, 2021 and expires on February 16, 2022. Our advisor uses its best efforts, subject to the oversight and review of our board, to, among other things, research, identify, review and make investments in and dispositions of properties and securities on our behalf consistent with our investment policies and objectives. Our advisor performs its duties and responsibilities under the Advisory Agreement as our fiduciary. Our advisor is 75.0% owned and managed by wholly owned subsidiaries of American Healthcare Investors, LLC, or American Healthcare Investors, and 25.0% owned by a wholly owned subsidiary of Griffin Capital Company, LLC, or Griffin Capital, or collectively, our co-sponsors. American Healthcare Investors is 47.1%remaining 5.0% limited OP units were owned by AHI Group Holdings, LLC, which is owned and controlled by Jeffrey T. Hanson, the non-executive Chairman of our board of directors, or AHI Group Holdings, 45.1% indirectly owned by Colony Capital, Inc. (NYSE: CLNY), or Colony Capital,our board, Danny Prosky, our Chief Executive Officer, President and 7.8% owned by James F.director, and Mathieu B. Streiff, one of our directors; Platform Healthcare Investor TII, LLC; Flaherty III,Trust; and a former partnerwholly-owned subsidiary of Colony Capital. We are not affiliated with Griffin Capital Griffin Capital Securities, LLC, or our dealer manager, Colony Capital or Mr. Flaherty; however, weCompany, LLC. See Note 12, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests, and Note 13, Equity — Noncontrolling Interests in Total Equity, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are affiliated with our advisor, American Healthcare Investors and AHI Group Holdings.
Since March 2020, the coronavirus, or COVID-19, pandemic has been dramatically impacting the United States, which has resulted in an aggressive worldwide effort to contain the spreada part of the virus. These efforts have significantly and adversely disrupted economic markets and impacted commercial activity worldwide, including markets in which we own and/or operate properties, and the prolonged economic impact remains uncertain. In addition, the continuously evolving nature of the COVID-19 pandemic makes it difficult to ascertain the long-term impact it will havethis Annual Report on real estate markets and our portfolio of investments. Considerable uncertainty still surrounds the COVID-19 pandemic and its effects on the population, as well as the effectiveness of any responses taken on national and local levels by government and public health authorities and businesses to contain and combat the outbreak and spread of the virus, including the widespread availability and use of effective vaccines. In particular, government-imposed business closures and re-opening restrictions, as well as self-imposed restrictions of discretionary activities, have dramatically impacted the operations of our real estate investments and our tenants across the country, such as creating significant declines in resident occupancy. Further, our senior housing facilities have also experienced dramatic increases and may continue to experience increases in costs to careForm 10-K, for residents; particularly labor costs to maintain staffing levels to care for the aged population during this crisis, costs of COVID-19 testing of employees and residents and costs to procure the volume of personal protective equipment, or PPE, and other supplies required. For a further discussion of the ownership in our operating partnership.
Public Offerings
As of December 31, 2023, after taking into consideration the Merger and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemicreverse stock split as discussed below, we had issued 65,445,557 shares of common stock for a total of $2,737,716,000 since February 26, 2014 in our initial public offerings and our distribution reinvestment plan, or DRIP, offerings (including historical offering amounts sold by GAHR III and GAHR IV prior to the Merger).
On November 10, 2022, our business, see Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussionboard approved charter amendments to effect, on November 15, 2022, a one-for-four reverse stock split of our common stock and Analysisa corresponding reverse split of Financial Conditionthe OP units, or the Reverse Splits. All numbers of common shares and Results of Operations.per share data, as well as the OP units, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been retroactively adjusted for all periods presented to give effect to the Reverse Splits.
Key developments
•On March 31, 2020, in consideration of the impact the COVID-19 pandemic has had onFebruary 9, 2024, pursuant to a Registration Statement filed with the United States globally,Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on Form S-11 (File No. 333-267464), as amended, we closed our business operations, as well asunderwritten public offering, or the 2024 Offering, through which we issued 64,400,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, for a total of $772,800,000 in gross offering proceeds. Such amounts include the exercise in full of the underwriters’ overallotment option to protect our capital and maximize our liquidity in an effort to strengthen our long-term financial prospects, our board decreased our distributions to stockholderspurchase up to an annualized distribution rateadditional 8,400,000 shares of $0.40 per share. In addition,common stock. These shares are listed on March 31, 2020, our board suspended our share repurchase plan with respect to all repurchase requests other than repurchases resulting fromNew York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, under the death or qualifying disability of stockholders, beginning with share repurchase requests submitted for repurchase during the second quarter of 2020.
•In October 2020, our board established a special committee of our board, which consists of all of our independent directors, to investigatetrading symbol “AHR” and analyze strategic alternatives, including but not limited to, the sale of our assets, a listing of our sharesbegan trading on a national securities exchange, or a merger with another entity, including a merger with another unlisted entity that we expect would enhance our value. There can be no assurance that this strategic alternative review process will result in a transaction being pursued, or if pursued, that any such transaction would ultimately be consummated. For a further discussion, see Part III, Item 10, Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
•In connection with the strategic alternative review process and in order to facilitate a strategic transaction, on March 18, 2021, our board authorized the suspension of the DRIP, effective as of April 1, 2021. As a consequence of the suspension of the DRIP, beginning with the April 2021 distributions, which will be payable on or about May 1, 2021, there will be no further issuances of shares pursuant to the DRIP, unless and until our board reinstates the DRIP, and stockholders who are participants in the DRIP will receive cash distributions instead. In addition, on March 18, 2021, our board approved the suspension of our share repurchase plan with respect to all repurchase requests received by us after February 28, 2021, including repurchases resulting from the death or qualifying disability of stockholders.7, 2024. See Note 12,13, Equity, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion of our share repurchase plan.public offerings.
Key Developments
•During 2023, we, through our majority-owned subsidiary, Trilogy Investors, LLC, or Trilogy, entered into further amendments to an amended and restated loan agreement, or the 2019 Trilogy Credit Agreement, to: (i) extend the maturity date of the 2019 Trilogy Credit Agreement to June 5, 2025; and (ii) update the definition of Implied Debt Service (as defined in such agreement), which is used to calculate the Real Estate Borrowing Base Availability (as defined in such agreement), for interest rate changes and to add an annual interest-only payment calculation option.
•During 2023, we entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge an aggregate of $750,000,000 of our variable-rate debt.
•During 2023, we expanded our integrated senior health campuses segment by $49,531,000 primarily through the acquisition and expansion of campuses.
•During 2023, we disposed of properties within our outpatient medical, or OM, and SHOP segments for an aggregate contract sales price of $194,640,000.
•On March 18, 2021,November 3, 2023, we entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement with subsidiaries of NorthStar Healthcare Income, Inc., or NHI, which provides us with the option to purchase their 24.0% minority membership interest in Trilogy REIT Holdings, LLC. If we exercise this purchase option, we will own 100% of Trilogy REIT Holdings, LLC, which will in turn cause us to indirectly own approximately 97.5% of Trilogy.
•On February 9, 2024, we completed our board, atunderwritten public offering through which we issued 64,400,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, for a total of $772,800,000 in gross offering proceeds. These shares are listed on the recommendationNYSE under the trading symbol “AHR” and began trading on February 7, 2024.
•On February 14, 2024, we, through our operating partnership, entered into an amendment, or the 2024 Credit Agreement, to our existing credit agreement, to increase the aggregate maximum borrowing capacity to up to $1,150,000,000 and extend the maturity date of the audit committeesenior unsecured revolving credit facility portion of the 2024 Credit Agreement to February 14, 2028. The 2024 Credit Agreement replaced our board, comprised solelyexisting credit agreement that had an aggregate maximum principal amount of independent directors, unanimously approved and established an updated estimated per share NAV of our common stock of $9.22 as of September 30, 2020. For a further discussion, see Part II, Item 5, Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities, and Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.up to $1,050,000,000.
•As of March 16, 2021,22, 2024, we owned 89 properties, comprising 94and/or operated 318 buildings and integrated senior health campuses, or approximately 4,871,00019,451,000 square feet of gross leasable area, or GLA, for an aggregate contract purchase price of $1,092,381,000. As$4,566,829,000. In addition, as of March 16, 2021,22, 2024, we also owned a 6.0% interest in a joint venture which owns a portfolio of integrated senior health campuses and ancillary businesses.real estate-related debt investment purchased for $60,429,000.
Our Structure
The following chart indicates the relationship among us, our advisor and certain of its affiliates as of March 26, 2021:
Our principal executive offices are located at 18191 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 300, Irvine, California 92612, and our telephone number is (949) 270-9200. We maintain a websiteweb site at http://www.healthcarereitiv.comwww.americanhealthcarereit.com,, at which there is additional information about us and our affiliates.us. The contents of that site are not incorporated by reference in, or otherwise a part of, this filing. We make our periodic and current reports and all amendments to those reports available athttp://www.healthcarereitiv.com www.americanhealthcarereit.comas soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. They also are available for printing by any stockholder upon request. In addition, copies of our filings with the SEC may be obtained from the SEC’s website, http://www.sec.gov. Access to these filings is free of charge.
Business Objectives and Growth Strategies
Our business objectives are to grow our earnings and cash flows, maintain financial flexibility, increase the value of our portfolio, make regular cash distributions to our stockholders and generate attractive risk-adjusted returns through the following growth strategies:
•external growth through disciplined and targeted acquisitions to expand our diversified portfolio;
•continue to develop integrated senior health campuses through experienced development partners (i.e., Trilogy);
Investment Objectives
Our investment objectives are:
•to preserve, protectprovide sustained stability through consistent outpatient medical building performance with the opportunity for revenue growth driven by occupancy gains and return our stockholders’ capital contributions;
•to pay regular cash distributions;improving lease spreads; and
•to realize growth in the value ofactively position our investments upon our ultimate sale of such investments.balance sheet for growth.
Our board may change our investment objectives if it determines it is advisable and in the best interest of our stockholders. During the term of the Advisory Agreement, decisions relating to the purchase or sale of investments will be made by our advisor, subject to oversight by our advisor’s investment committee and our board.
Investment Strategy
We have invested, and may continue to invest, in a diversified portfolio of real estate properties, focusing primarily on medical office buildings, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities. On an infrequent and opportunistic basis, we also may originate or acquire secured loans and other real estate-related investments. We have acquired, and may continue to acquire, properties either directly or jointly with third parties.parties and may also consider disposing of, non-corepropertiesfromtimeto time outright or in joint ventures. We also have originated and acquired, and may continue to originate or acquire, secured loans and other real estate-related investments on an infrequent and opportunistic basis.
We generally seek investments that produce current income; however, whenwe have selectively developed, are currently developing (through Trilogy), and as determined appropriate by our advisor, ourmay continue to selectively develop, real estate properties. Our portfolio may include properties in various stages of development other than those producing current income. These stages include unimproved land both with and without entitlements and permits, property to be redeveloped and repositioned, newly constructed properties and properties in lease-up or other stabilization stages, all of which have limited or no relevant operating histories and current income. Our advisor makesWe make such investment determinations based upon a variety of factors, including the availableanticipated risk-adjusted returns for such properties when compared with other available properties, the appropriate diversification of theour portfolio and our objectives of realizing both current income and capital appreciation upon the ultimate sale of properties.appreciation.
We seek to maximize long-term stockholder value by generating sustainable growth ingrow our earnings and cash flows, maintain financial flexibility, increase the value of our portfolio, make regular cash distributions and portfolio value.generate attractive risk-adjusted returns for our stockholders through the business objectives and growth strategies discussed above. In order to achieve these objectives, we may invest using a number of investment structures, which may include direct acquisitions, joint ventures, leveraged investments, issuing securities for property and direct and indirect investments in real estate. In order to maintain our exemption from regulation as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the Investment Company Act, we may be required to limit our investments in certain types of real estate-related investments. See “Investment Company Act Considerations” below for a further discussion.
For each of our investments, regardless of property type, we seek to invest in properties with the following attributes:
•Strong Local Health Systems and Operating Partners. We seek to invest in properties that are associated with strong health systems and operators, provide exceptional care, have dominant market share and/or are critical to the healthcare delivery system in the communities that they serve.
•Quality. We seek to acquire properties that are suitable for their intended use with a quality of construction that is capable of sustaining the property’s long-term investment potential, for the long-term, assuming funding of budgeted maintenance, repairs and capital improvements.
•Location. We seek to acquire properties that are located in established or otherwise appropriate markets, for comparable properties, with access and visibility suitable to meet the needs of itstheir occupants. In addition to United States properties, we also may seek to acquire international properties that meet our investment criteria.
•Market; Supply and Demand. We focus on local or regional markets that have potential for stable and growing property level cash flows overin the long-term.long term. These determinations are based in part on an evaluation of local and regional economic, demographic and regulatory factors affecting the property. For instance, we favor markets that indicate a growing population and employment base orand markets that exhibit potential limitations on additions to supply, such as barriers to new construction. Barriers to new construction include lack of available land, and stringent zoning restrictions. In addition,restrictions and states where certificates of need are required. Conversely, we generally seek to limit our investments in areas that have limited potential for growth.
•Predictable Capital Needs. We seek to acquire properties where the future expected capital needs can be reasonably projected in a manner that would enable us to meet our objectives of growth in cash flows and preservation of capital and stability.objectives.
•Cash Flows. We seek to acquire properties where the current and projected cash flows, including the potential for appreciation in value, would enable us to meet our overall investment objectives.maximize long-term stockholder value. We evaluate cash flows as well as expected growth and the potential for appreciation.
We are not limited as to the geographic areas where we may acquire properties. We are not specifically limited in the number or size of properties we may acquire or on the percentage of our assets that we may invest in a single property or investment. The number and mix of properties and real estate-related investments we will acquire will depend upon real estate and market conditions and other circumstances existing at the time we are acquiring our properties and making our investments and the amount of debt financing available.
Real Estate Investments
We have invested, and may continue to invest, in a diversified portfolio of real estate investments, focusing primarily on medical office buildings, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities. We generally seek investments that produce current income. OurWe expect our real estate investments mayto include:
•outpatient medical office buildings;
•skilled nursing facilities;integrated senior health campuses;
•senior housing facilities;housing;
•SNFs; and
•healthcare-related facilities operated utilizing a RIDEA structure;structure.
Our real estate investments may also include:
•hospitals;
•long-term acute care facilities;
•surgery centers;
•memory care facilities;
•specialty medical and diagnostic service facilities;
•laboratories and research facilities;
•pharmaceutical and medical supply manufacturing facilities; and
•offices leased to tenants in healthcare-related industries.industries, including life sciences.
Our advisorWe generally seeksseek to acquire real estate on our behalf of the types described above that will best enable us to meet our investment objectives, taking into account, among other things, the diversification of our portfolio at the time, relevant real estate and financial factors, the location, the income-producing capacity and the prospects for long-rangelong-term appreciation of a particular property and other considerations.property. As a result, we may acquire properties other than the types described above. In addition, we may acquire properties that vary from the parameters described above for a particular property type.
The consideration for each real estate investment must be authorized by a majority of our directors or a duly authorized committee of our board, and ordinarily is based on the fair market value of the investment. If the majority of our independent directors or a duly authorized committee of our board so determines, or if the investment is to be acquired from one of our co-sponsors, our advisor, any of our directors or an affiliate, the fair market value determination must be supported by an appraisal obtained from a qualified, independent appraiser selected by a majority of our independent directors.
Our real estate investments generally take the form of holding fee title or long-term leasehold interests. Our investments may be made either directly through our operating partnership or indirectly through investments in joint ventures, limited liability companies, general partnerships or other co-ownership arrangements with the developers of the properties affiliates of our advisor or other persons. See “Joint Ventures” below for a further discussion.
We have exercised, and may continue to exercise, our purchase options to acquire properties that we currently lease. In addition, we have participated in sale-leaseback transactions, in which we purchase real estate investments and lease them back to the sellers of such properties. Our advisor will use its best effortsWe seek to structure any such sale-leaseback transaction such that the lease will be characterized as a “true lease” and so that we will be treated as the owner of the property for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Our obligation to close a transaction involving the purchase of real estate is generally conditioned upon the delivery and verification of certain documents, from the seller or developer, including, where appropriate:
• (i) plans and specifications;
• (ii) environmental reports (generally a minimum of a Phase I investigation);
• (iii) building condition reports;
• (iv) surveys;
• (v) evidence of marketable title subject to such liens and encumbrances as are acceptable to our advisor;
•encumbrances; (vi) audited financial statements covering recent operations of real properties having operating histories unless such statements are not required to be filed with the SEC and delivered to stockholders;
• (vii) title insurance policies; and
• (viii) the availability of property and liability insurance policies.
In determining whether to purchase a particular real estate investment, we may in circumstances in which our advisor deems it appropriate, obtain an option on such property, including land suitable for development. The amount paid for an option is normally surrendered if the real estate is not purchased and is normally credited against the purchase price if the real estate is purchased. We also may enter into arrangements with the seller or developer of a real estate investment whereby the seller or developer agrees that if, during a stated period, the real estate investment does not generate specified cash flows, the seller or developer will pay us cash in an amount necessary to reach the specified cash flows level, subject in some cases to negotiated dollar limitations.
We will not purchase or lease real estate in which one of our co-sponsors, our advisor, any of our directors or any of their affiliates have an interest without a determination by a majority of our disinterested directors and a majority of our disinterested independent directors that such transaction is fair and reasonable to us and at a price to us no greater than the cost of the real estate investment to the affiliated seller or lessor, unless there is substantial justification for the excess amount and the excess amount is reasonable. In no event will we acquire any such real estate investment at an amount in excess of its current appraised value.
We have obtained, and we intend to continue to obtain, adequate insurance coverage for all real estate investments in which we invest.
We have acquired, and maywe intend to continue to acquire, leased properties with long-term leases and we generally do not intend to operate any healthcare-related facilities directly. As a REIT, we are prohibited from operating healthcare-related facilities directly; however, we have leased, and may continue to lease, healthcare-related facilities that we acquire to whollywholly- owned taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRS.TRS, utilizing a RIDEA structure permitted by the Code. In such an event, our TRS will
engage a third party in the business of operating healthcare-related facilities to manage the property utilizing a RIDEA structure permitted by the Code.property. Through our TRS, we bear all operational risks and liabilities associated with the operation of such healthcare-related facilities unlike our triple-net leased properties. Such operational risks and liabilities might include, but are not limited to, resident quality of care claims and governmental reimbursement matters.
ConstructionDevelopment and DevelopmentConstruction Activities
From timeOn an opportunistic basis, we have selectively developed, are currently developing (through Trilogy), and may continue to time, we may construct andselectively develop, real estate assets or render serviceswithin our integrated senior health campuses segment and other segments of our portfolio when market conditions warrant, which may be funded through capital that we, and in connection with these activities. Wecertain circumstances, our joint venture partners, provide. In doing so, we may be able to reduce overall purchase costs by constructing and developing property versus purchasing an existing property. We retain and will continue to retain independent contractors to perform the actual construction work on tenant improvements, such as installing heating, ventilationwell as property development.
Terms of Leases
The terms and air conditioning systems.
Additionally, in the event that our advisor assists with planning and coordinating the constructionconditions of any lease we enter into with our tenants may vary substantially. However, we expect that a majority of our tenant improvementsleases will require the tenant to pay or capital improvements, our advisor may be paid a construction management fee of up to 5.0%reimburse us for some or all of the cost of such improvements. We may also engage our advisor or its affiliates to provide development-related services for all or someoperating expenses of the properties that we develop or acquire for refurbishment. In those cases, we pay our advisor or its affiliates a development fee that is usual and customary for comparable services rendered for similar projects in the geographic market where the services are provided. However, we do not pay a development fee to our advisor or its affiliates if our advisor or any of its affiliates elect to receive an acquisition feebuilding based on the costtenant’s proportionate share of rentable space within the building. Operating expenses typically include, but are not limited to, real estate and other taxes, utilities, insurance and building repairs, and other building operation and management costs. For our multi-tenanted properties, we generally expect to be responsible for the replacement of certain capital improvements affecting a property, including structural components of a property such development.as the roof of a building and other capital improvements such as parking facilities. We expect that many of our tenant leases will have terms of five or more years, some of which may have renewal options.
Substantially all of our leases with residents at our SHOP and integrated senior health campuses are for a term of one year or less, which creates the opportunity for operators to adjust rents to reflect current market conditions.
Joint Ventures
We have entered into, and we may continue to enter into, joint ventures, general partnerships and other arrangements with one or more institutions or individuals, including real estate developers, operators, owners, investors and others, some of whom may be affiliates of our advisor, for the purpose of acquiring real estate. Our investment in Trilogy is an example of a joint venture into which we have entered. Such joint ventures may be leveraged with debt financing or unleveraged. We have entered into, and may continue to enter into, joint ventures to further diversify our investments or to access investments which meet our investment criteria that would otherwise be unavailable to us. In determining whether to invest in a particular joint venture, our advisorwe will evaluate the real estate that such joint venture owns or is being formed to own under the same criteria described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the selection of our other properties. However, we will not participate in tenant in commontenant-in-common syndications or transactions.
Joint ventures with unaffiliated third parties may be structured such that the investment made by us and the co-venturerother joint venture party are on substantially different terms and conditions. For example, while we and a co-venturer may invest an equal amount of capital in an investment, the investment may be structured such that we have a right to priority distributions of cash flows up to
a certain target return while the co-venturer may receive a disproportionately greater share of cash flows than we are to receive once such target return has been achieved. This type of investment structure may result in the co-venturerother joint venture party receiving more of the cash flows, including appreciation, of an investment than we would receive.receive, or may result in certain conflict of interest. See Item 1A, Risk Factors — Risks Related to Joint Ventures, for a further discussion.
We have invested, and may continue to invest, in general partnerships or joint ventures with other American Healthcare Investors-sponsored programs or Griffin Capital programs or affiliates of our advisor to enable us to increase our equity participation in such ventures, so that ultimately we own a larger equity percentage of the property. Our entering into joint ventures with our advisor or any of its affiliates may result in certain conflicts of interest. See Item 1A, Risk Factors — Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest — We have entered into a joint venture with another program and may continue to enter into joint venture programs sponsored or advised by one of our co-sponsors or one of their affiliates and may face conflicts of interest or disagreements with our joint venture partners that may not be resolved as quickly or on terms as advantageous to us as would be the case if the joint venture had been negotiated at arm’s-length with an independent joint venture partner, for a further discussion.
We may only enter into joint ventures with other American Healthcare Investors-sponsored programs or Griffin Capital programs, affiliates of our advisor or any of our directors for the acquisition of properties if:
•a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in such transaction, approves the transaction as being fair and reasonable to us; and
•the investment by us and such affiliates are on substantially the same terms and conditions.
Real Estate-Related Investments
In addition to our acquisition of medical office buildings, skilled nursing facilities and senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities,properties, we have invested on an infrequent and opportunistic basis, we alsoand may continue to invest, in real estate-related investments, including loans and securities investments.
Investing In and Originating LoansInvestments in Real Estate Mortgages
We have invested, and we may continue to invest, in first and second mortgage loans, mezzanine loans and bridge loans. However, we will not make or invest in any loans that are subordinate to any mortgage or equity interest of our advisor, any of our directors one of our co-sponsors, or any of our affiliates. We also may invest in participations in mortgage loans. Second mortgage loans are secured by second deeds of trust on real property that is already subject to prior mortgage indebtedness. A mezzanine loan is a loan made in respect of certain real property but is secured by a lien on the ownership interests of the entity that, directly or indirectly, owns the real property. A bridge loan is short termshort-term financing for an individual or business, until permanent or the next stage of financing can be obtained. Mortgage participation investments are investments in partial interests of mortgages of the type described above that are made and administered by third-party mortgage lenders. We may also make seller financing loans in connection with the disposition of our properties. In evaluating prospective loan investments, our advisor considerswe consider factors, including, but not limited to: (i) the ratio of the investment amount to the underlying property’s value,value; (ii) current and projected cash flows of the property,property; (iii) the degree of liquidity of the investment,investment; (iv) the quality, experience and creditworthiness of the borrowerborrower; and (v) in the case of mezzanine loans, the ability to acquire the underlying real property.
Our criteria for making or investing in loans will beare substantially the same as those involved in our investment in properties. We do not intend to make loans to other persons, to underwrite securities of other issuers or to engage in the purchase and sale of any types of investments other than those relating to real estate. We generally will not make or invest in mortgage loans on any one property if the aggregate amount of all mortgage loans outstanding on the property, including our loan, would exceed an amount equal to 85.0% of the appraised value of the property, as determined by an appraiser, unless we find substantial justification due to other underwriting criteria; however, our policy generally will be that the aggregate amount of all mortgage loans outstanding on the property, including our loan, would not exceed 75.0% of the appraised value of the property. We may find such justification in connection with the purchase of loans in cases in which we believe there is a high probability of our foreclosure upon the property in order to acquire the underlying assets and in which the cost of the loan investment does not exceed the fair market value of the underlying property. We will not invest in or make loans unless an appraisal has been obtained concerning the underlying property, except for those loans insured or guaranteed by a government or government agency.agency or in connection with seller financing loans. In cases in which a majority of our independent directors so determine and in the event the transaction is with one of our co-sponsors, our advisor, any of our directors or any of their respective affiliates, the appraisal will be obtained from a certified independent appraiser to support its determination of fair market value.
In addition, we will seek to obtain a customary lender’s title insurance policy or commitment as to the priority of the mortgage or condition of the title. Because the factors considered, including the specific weight we place on each factor, will vary for each prospective loan investment, we do not, and are not able to, assign a specific weight or level of importance to any particular factor.
Our advisorWe will evaluate all potential loan investments to determine if the security for the loan and the loan-to-value ratio meets our investment criteria and objectives. Most loans that we will consider for investment would provide for monthly payments of interest, and some may also provide for principal amortization, although many loans of the nature that we will consider provide for payments of interest only and a payment of principal in full at the end of the loan term. We will not originate loans with negative amortization provisions.
We are not limited as to the amount of our assets that may be invested in mezzanine loans, bridge loans and second mortgage loans. However, we recognize that these types of loans are riskier than first deeds of trust or first priority mortgages on income-producing, fee-simple properties, and we expect to minimize the amount of these types of loans in our portfolio. Our advisorWe will evaluate the fact that these types of loans are riskier in determining the rate of interest on the loans. We do not have any policy that limits the amount that we may invest in any single loan or the amount we may invest in loans to any one borrower. We have not established a portfolio turnover policy with respect to loans we may invest in or originate.
InvestingInvestment in Other Securities
We have invested, and may invest in the following types of securities: (i) upcontinue to 10.0% of our total assets in equity securities such as common stocks, preferred stocks and convertible preferred securities of public or private unaffiliated real estate companies (including other REITs, real estate operating companies and other real estate companies); (ii) up to 10.0% of our total assetsinvest, in debt securities such as commercial mortgage-backed securities and debt securities issued by other unaffiliated real estate companies; and (iii) certain other types of securities thatcompanies. We may help us reach our diversification and other investment objectives. These other securities may include, but are not limited to, various types of collateralized debt obligations and certain non-United States dollar denominated securities.
Our advisor has substantial discretion with respect to the selection of specific securities investments. Our charter provides that we may notalso invest in equity securities unless a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction, approve such investment as being fair, competitive and commercially reasonable. Consistent with such requirements, in determining the types of securities investments to make, our advisor will adhere to a board-approved asset allocation framework consisting primarily of components such as: (i) target mix of securities across a range of risk/reward characteristics; (ii) exposure limits to individual securities; and (iii) exposure limits to securities subclasses (such as common equities, debt securities and foreign securities).
public or private real estate companies. Commercial mortgage-backed securities are securities that evidence interests in, or are secured by, a single commercial mortgage loan or a pool of commercial mortgage loans. Commercial mortgage-backed securities generally are pass-through certificates that represent beneficial ownership interests in common law trusts whose assets consist of defined portfolios of one or more commercial mortgage loans. They typically are issued in multiple tranches whereby the more senior classes are entitled to priority distributions from the trust’s income. Losses and other shortfalls from expected amounts to be received in the mortgage pool are borne by the most subordinate classes, which receive payments only after the more senior classes have received all principal and/or interest to which they are entitled. Commercial mortgage-backed securities are subject to all of the risks of the underlying mortgage loans. We may invest in investment grade and non-investment grade commercial mortgage-backed securities.
The specific number and mix of securities in which we invest will depend upon real estate market conditions, other circumstances existing at the time we are investing in securities and the amount of any future indebtedness that we may incur. We will not invest in securities of other issuers for the purpose of exercising control, and the first or second mortgages in which we intend to invest will likely not be insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs or otherwise guaranteed or insured. Real estate-related equity securities are generally unsecured and also may be subordinated to other obligations of the issuer. Our investments in real estate-related equity securities will involve special risks relating to the particular issuer of the equity securities, including the financial condition and business outlook of the issuer.
Our Strategies andFinancing Policies With Respect to Borrowing
We have used, and intend to continue to use, secured and unsecured debt as a means of providing additional funds for the acquisition of properties and real estate-related investments. Our ability to enhance our investment returns and to increase our diversification by acquiring assets using additional funds provided through borrowing could be adversely impacted if banks and other lending institutions reduce the amount of funds available for the types of loans we seek. When interest rates are high or financing is otherwise unavailable on a timely basis, we may purchase certain assets for cash with the intention of obtaining
debt financing at a later time. We have also used, and may continue to use, derivative financial instruments such as fixed interest rate swaps and caps to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements.
We anticipate that our overall leverage will approximate 50.0% of the combined market value of all of our real estate, real estate-related investments and joint venture interests, as determined at the end of each calendar year. For these purposes, the fair market value of each asset will be equal to the purchase price paid for the asset or, if the asset was appraised subsequent
to the date of purchase, then the fair market value will be equal to the value reported in the most recent independent appraisal of the asset. Our borrowing policies do not limit the amount we may borrow with respect to any individual investment. As of December 31, 2020, our aggregate borrowings were 39.5% of the combined market value of all our real estate investments.
Our board reviews our aggregate borrowings at least quarterly to ensure that such borrowings are reasonable in relation to our net assets. Our borrowing policies preclude us from borrowing in excess of 300% of our net assets, unless any excess in such borrowing is approved by a majority of our independent directors and is disclosed in our next quarterly report along with justification for such excess. Net assets for purposes of this calculation are defined as our total assets, other than intangibles, valued at cost before deducting depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other similar non-cash reserves, less total liabilities. Generally, the preceding calculation is expected to approximate 75.0% of the aggregate cost of our real estate and real estate-related investments before depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other similar non-cash reserves. However, we may temporarily borrow in excess of these amounts if such excess is approved by a majority of our independent directors and disclosed to stockholders in our next quarterly report, along with justification for such excess. In such event, we will review our debt levels at that time and take action to reduce any such excess as soon as practicable. We may also incur indebtedness to finance improvements to properties and, if necessary, for working capital needs or to meet the distribution requirements applicable to REITs under the federal income tax laws. As of March 26, 2021 and December 31, 2020, our leverage did not exceed 300% of the value of our net assets.
Our charter restricts us from borrowing money from one of our co-sponsors, our advisor, any of our directors or any of their respective affiliates unless such loan is approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction, as being fair, competitive and commercially reasonable and no less favorable to us than comparable loans between unaffiliated parties. Our board controls our strategies with respect to borrowing and may change such strategies at any time without stockholder approval, subject to the maximum borrowing limit of 300% of our net assets described above. Our advisor uses its best effortsseek to obtain financing on the most favorable terms available to us and refinancesrefinance assets during the term of a loan only in limited circumstances, such as when a decline in interest rates makes it beneficial to prepay an existing loan, when an existing loan matures or if an attractive investment becomes available and the proceeds from the refinancing can be used to purchase such investment. The benefits of the refinancing may include increased cash flows resulting from reduced debt service requirements, an increase in distributions from proceeds of the refinancing and an increase in diversification and assets owned if all or a portion of the refinancing proceeds are reinvested.
When incurring secured debt, we may incur recourse indebtedness, which means that the lenders’ rights upon our default generally will not be limited to foreclosure on the property that secured the obligation. If we incur mortgage indebtedness, we will endeavor to obtain level payment financing, meaning that the amount of debt service payable would be substantially the same each year, although some mortgages are likely to provide for one large payment and we may incur floating or adjustable rate financing when our board determines it to be in our best interest.
Sale or DispositionDispositions
We have disposed, and may continue to dispose, of Assets
Our advisor and our boardassets. We will determine whether a particular property or real estate-related investment should be sold or otherwise disposed of after consideration of the relevant factors, including performance or projected performance of the property and marketprevailing economic conditions, with a view toward achievingmaximizing our principal investment objectives.
We intend to hold each property or real estate-related investment we acquire for an extended period. However, circumstances might arise which could result in a shortened holding period for certain investments. A property or real estate-related investment may be sold before the end of the expected holding period if:
• (i) diversification benefits exist associated with disposing of the investment and rebalancing our investment portfolio;
• (ii) an opportunity arises to pursue a more attractive investment;
•in the judgment of our advisor, (iii) the value of the investment might decline;
• (iv) with respect to properties, a major tenant involuntarily liquidates or is in default under its lease;
• (v) the investment was acquired as part of a portfolio acquisition and does not meet our general acquisition criteria;
• (vi) an opportunity exists to enhance overall investment returns by raising capital through sale of the investment; or
•in the judgment of our advisor, (vii) the sale of the investment is in our best interest and the best interestinterests of our stockholders.
The determination of whether a particular property or real estate-related investment should be sold or otherwise disposed of will be made after consideration of the relevant factors, including prevailing economic conditions, with a view toward maximizing our investment objectives.
Board Review of Our Investment Policies and Report of Independent Directors
Our board has established written policies on investments and borrowing. Our board is responsible for monitoring the administrative procedures, investment operations and performance of our company and our advisor to ensure such policies are carried out. Our charter requires that our independent directors review our investment policies at least annually to determine that the policies we are following are in the best interest of our stockholders. Each determination and the basis therefore is required to be set forth in the minutes of the applicable meetings of our directors. Implementation of our investment policies also may vary as new investment techniques are developed. Our investment policies may not be altered by our board without the approval of our stockholders.
As required by our charter, our independent directors have reviewed our policies outlined above and determined that they are in the best interests of our stockholders because: (i) they increase the likelihood that we will be able to acquire a diversified portfolio of income-producing properties, thereby reducing risk in our portfolio; (ii) there are sufficient property acquisition opportunities with the attributes that we seek; (iii) our executive officers, directors and affiliates of our advisor have expertise with the type of real estate investments we seek; and (iv) our borrowings will enable us to purchase assets and earn more real estate revenue earlier than we would otherwise have been able to, thereby increasing our likelihood of generating income for our stockholders and preserving stockholder capital.
Tax StatusTerms of Leases
The terms and Distribution Policy
Asconditions of any lease we enter into with our tenants may vary substantially. However, we expect that a REIT,majority of our tenant leases will require the tenant to pay or reimburse us for some or all of the operating expenses of the building based on the tenant’s proportionate share of rentable space within the building. Operating expenses typically include, but are not limited to, real estate and other taxes, utilities, insurance and building repairs, and other building operation and management costs. For our multi-tenanted properties, we generally expect to be responsible for the replacement of certain capital improvements affecting a property, including structural components of a property such as the roof of a building and other capital improvements such as parking facilities. We expect that many of our tenant leases will have terms of five or more years, some of which may have renewal options.
Substantially all of our leases with residents at our SHOP and integrated senior health campuses are for a term of one year or less, which creates the opportunity for operators to adjust rents to reflect current market conditions.
Joint Ventures
We have entered into, and we may continue to enter into, joint ventures, general partnerships and other arrangements with one or more institutions or individuals, including real estate developers, operators, owners, investors and others, for the purpose of acquiring real estate. Our investment in Trilogy is an example of a joint venture into which we have entered. Such joint ventures may be leveraged with debt financing or unleveraged. We have entered into, and may continue to enter into, joint ventures to further diversify our investments or to access investments which meet our investment criteria that would otherwise be unavailable to us. In determining whether to invest in a particular joint venture, we will evaluate the real estate that such joint venture owns or is being formed to own under the same criteria described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the selection of our other properties. However, we will not participate in tenant-in-common syndications or transactions.
Joint ventures with unaffiliated third parties may be structured such that the investment made by us and the other joint venture party are on substantially different terms and conditions. This type of investment structure may result in the other joint venture party receiving more of the cash flows, including appreciation, of an investment than we would receive, or may result in certain conflict of interest. See Item 1A, Risk Factors — Risks Related to Joint Ventures, for a further discussion.
Real Estate-Related Investments
In addition to our acquisition of properties, we have invested on an infrequent and opportunistic basis, and may continue to invest, in real estate-related investments, including loans and securities investments.
Investments in Real Estate Mortgages
We have invested, and we may continue to invest, in first and second mortgage loans, mezzanine loans and bridge loans. However, we will not make or invest in any loans that are subordinate to any mortgage or equity interest of any of our directors or affiliates. We also may invest in participations in mortgage loans. Second mortgage loans are secured by second deeds of trust on real property that is already subject to federal income taxprior mortgage indebtedness. A mezzanine loan is a loan made in respect of certain real property but is secured by a lien on taxable incomethe ownership interests of the entity that, we distribute to our stockholders.directly or indirectly, owns the real property. A bridge loan is short-term financing for an individual or business, until the next stage of financing can be obtained. Mortgage participation investments are investments in partial interests of mortgages of the type described above that are made and administered by third-party mortgage lenders. We qualified, and elected to be taxed, as a REIT undermay also make seller financing loans in connection with the Code beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2016, and we intend to continue to qualify to be taxed as a REIT. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to currently distribute at least 90.0%disposition of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to our stockholders. Existing Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, guidance includes a safe harbor pursuant to which publicly offered REITs can satisfyproperties. In evaluating prospective loan investments, we consider factors, including, but not limited to: (i) the distribution requirement by distributing a combination of cash and stock to stockholders. In general, to qualify under the safe harbor, each stockholder must elect to receive either cash or stock, and the aggregate cash componentratio of the distributioninvestment amount to stockholders must represent at least 20.0% of the total distribution. In May 2020, the IRS issued similar guidance that lowered the cash component of the distribution to 10.0% for dividends declared between April 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020.
We cannot predict if we will generate sufficient cash flows to continue to pay cash distributions to our stockholders on an ongoing basis or at all. The amount of any cash distributions is determined by our board and depends on the amount of distributable funds,underlying property’s value; (ii) current and projected cash requirements, tax considerations, any limitations imposed byflows of the termsproperty; (iii) the degree of indebtedness we may incurliquidity of the investment; (iv) the quality, experience and other factors. If our investments produce sufficient cash flows, we expect to continue to pay distributions to our stockholders on a monthly basis. Because our cash available for distribution in any year may be less than 90.0%creditworthiness of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains, for the year, we may be required to borrow money, use proceeds from the issuance of securities (in subsequent offerings, if any) or sell assets to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the distribution requirement. These methods of obtaining funds could affect future distributions by increasing operating costs. We have not established any limit on the amount of net proceeds from our initial offering or borrowings that may be used to fund distributions, except that, in accordance with our organizational documentsborrower; and Maryland law, we may not make distributions that would: (i) cause us to be unable to pay our debts as they become due(v) in the usual coursecase of business; or (ii) cause our total assetsmezzanine loans, the ability to be less thanacquire the sum of our total liabilities plus senior liquidation preferences.
To the extent that any distributions to our stockholders are paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, such distributions are taxable as ordinary income. To the extent that any of our distributions exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits, such amounts constitute a return of capital to our stockholders for federal income tax purposes, to the extent of their basis in their stock and thereafter will constitute capital gain. Any portion of distributions to our stockholders paid from net offering proceeds or borrowings constitutes a return of capital to our stockholders.
Monthly distributions are calculated with daily record dates so distribution benefits begin to accrue immediately upon becoming a stockholder. However, our board could, at any time, elect to pay distributions quarterly to reduce administrative costs. The amount of distributions we pay to our stockholders is determined by our board and is dependent on a number of factors, including funds available for the payment of distributions, our financial condition, capital expenditure requirements, annual distribution requirements needed to maintain our status as a REIT under the Code and restrictions imposed by our organizational documents and Maryland Law.
See Part II, Item 5, Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities — Distributions, for a further discussion of distributions approved by our board.underlying real property.
CompetitionOur criteria for making or investing in loans are substantially the same as those involved in our investment in properties. We do not intend to make loans to other persons, to underwrite securities of other issuers or to engage in the purchase and sale of any types of investments other than those relating to real estate. We generally will not make or invest in mortgage loans on any one property if the aggregate amount of all mortgage loans outstanding on the property, including our loan, would exceed an amount equal to 85.0% of the appraised value of the property, as determined by an appraiser, unless we find substantial justification due to other underwriting criteria; however, our policy generally will be that the aggregate amount of all mortgage loans outstanding on the property, including our loan, would not exceed 75.0% of the appraised value of the property. We may find such justification in connection with the purchase of loans in cases in which we believe there is a high probability of our foreclosure upon the property in order to acquire the underlying assets and in which the cost of the loan investment does not exceed the fair market value of the underlying property. We will not invest in or make loans unless an appraisal has been obtained concerning the underlying property, except for those loans insured or guaranteed by a government or government agency or in connection with seller financing loans. In the event the transaction is with any of our directors or their respective affiliates, the appraisal will be obtained from a certified independent appraiser to support its determination of fair market value. In addition, we will seek to obtain a customary lender’s title insurance policy or commitment as to the priority of the mortgage or condition of the title. Because the factors considered, including the specific weight we place on each factor, will vary for each prospective loan investment, we do not, and are not able to, assign a specific weight or level of importance to any particular factor.
We competewill evaluate all potential loan investments to determine if the security for the loan and the loan-to-value ratio meets our investment criteria and objectives. Most loans that we will consider for investment would provide for monthly payments of interest, and some may also provide for principal amortization, although many loans of the nature that we will consider provide for payments of interest only and a payment of principal in full at the end of the loan term. We will not originate loans with manynegative amortization provisions.
We are not limited as to the amount of our assets that may be invested in mezzanine loans, bridge loans and second mortgage loans. However, we recognize that these types of loans are riskier than first deeds of trust or first priority mortgages on income-producing, fee-simple properties, and we expect to minimize the amount of these types of loans in our portfolio. We will evaluate the fact that these types of loans are riskier in determining the rate of interest on the loans. We do not have any policy that limits the amount that we may invest in any single loan or the amount we may invest in loans to any one borrower. We have not established a portfolio turnover policy with respect to loans we invest in or originate.
Investment in Other Securities
We have invested, and may continue to invest, in debt securities such as commercial mortgage-backed securities issued by other entities engagedunaffiliated real estate companies. We may also invest in equity securities of public or private real estate companies. Commercial mortgage-backed securities are securities that evidence interests in, or are secured by, a single commercial mortgage loan or a pool of commercial mortgage loans. Commercial mortgage-backed securities generally are pass-through certificates that represent beneficial ownership interests in common law trusts whose assets consist of defined portfolios of one or more commercial mortgage loans. They typically are issued in multiple tranches whereby the more senior classes are entitled to priority distributions from the trust’s income. Losses and other shortfalls from expected amounts to be received in the acquisition, development, leasingmortgage pool are borne by the most subordinate classes, which receive payments only after the more senior classes have received all principal and/or interest to which they are entitled. Commercial mortgage-backed securities are subject to all of the risks of the underlying mortgage loans. We may invest in investment grade and financingnon-investment grade commercial mortgage-backed securities.
The specific number and mix of healthcare-relatedsecurities in which we invest will depend upon real estate market conditions, other circumstances existing at the time we are investing in securities and the amount of any future indebtedness that we may incur. We will not invest in securities of other issuers for the purpose of exercising control, and the first or second mortgages in which we intend to invest will likely not be insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs or otherwise guaranteed or insured. Real estate-related equity securities are generally unsecured and also may be subordinated to other obligations of the issuer. Our investments in real estate-related equity securities will involve special risks relating to the particular issuer of the equity securities, including the financial condition and business outlook of the issuer.
Financing Policies
We have used, and intend to continue to use, secured and unsecured debt as a means of providing additional funds for the acquisition of properties and real estate-related investments. Our ability to successfully compete is impacted by economic trends, availability of acceptableenhance our investment opportunities, our ability to negotiate beneficial investment terms, availability and cost of capital, construction and development costs and applicable laws and regulations.
Income from our investments is dependent on the ability of our tenants and operators to compete with other healthcare operators. These operators compete on a local and regional basis for patients and residents and the operators’ ability to successfully attract and retain patients and residents depends on key factors such as the number of properties in the local market, the quality of the affiliated health system, proximity to hospital campuses, the price and range of services available, the scope and quality of care, reputation, age and appearance of each property, demographic trends and the cost of care in each locality. As a result, we may have to provide rent concessions, incur charges for tenant improvements, or offer other inducements, or we may be unable to timely lease vacant space in our properties, all of which may have an adverse impact on our results of operations. Private, federal and state payment programs and the effect of other laws and regulations may also have a significant impact on the ability of our tenants and operators to compete successfully for patients and residents at the properties. For additional information on the risks associated with our business, please see Item 1A, Risk Factors.
Government Regulations
Our properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, and changes in these laws and regulations, or their interpretation by agencies, occur frequently. Further, our tenants and our healthcare facility operators and managers, including our TRS entities that own and operate our properties under a RIDEA structure, are typically subject to extensive and complex federal, state and local healthcare laws and regulations relating to quality of care, government reimbursement, fraud and abuse practices and similar laws governing the operation of healthcare facilities, and we expect the healthcare industry, in general, will continue to face increased regulation and pressure in the areas of healthcare management, fraud and provision of services, among others. If we fail to comply with these various requirements, we may incur governmental fines or private damage awards. While we believe that our properties are and will be in substantial compliance with all of these regulatory requirements, we do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether future requirements will require us to make significant unanticipated capital expenditures that will adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. We believe, based in part on third-party due diligence reports which are generally obtained at the time we acquire the properties, that all of our properties comply in all material respects with current regulations. However, if we were required to make significant expenditures under applicable regulations, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to satisfy our debt service obligationsreturns and to pay distributionsincrease our diversification by acquiring assets using additional funds provided through borrowing could be adversely affected.
Privacyimpacted if banks and Security Laws and Regulations. Thereother lending institutions reduce the amount of funds available for the types of loans we seek. When interest rates are various United Statesfederal and state privacy laws and regulations that providehigh or financing is otherwise unavailable on a timely basis, we may purchase certain assets for consumer protection of personal health information, particularly electronic security and privacy. Compliance with such laws and regulations may require us to, among other things, conduct additional risk analysis, modify our risk management plan, implement new policies and procedures and conduct additional training. We are generally dependent on our tenants and management companies to fulfill our compliance obligations, and we have in certain circumstances developed a program to periodically monitor compliance with such obligations. However, there can be no assurance we would not be required to alter one or more of our systems and data security procedures to be in compliance with these laws. If we fail to adequately protect health information, we could be subject to civil or criminal liability and adverse publicity, which could harm our business and impact our ability to attract new tenants and residents. We may be required to notify individuals, as well as government agencies and the media, if we experience a data breach.
Healthcare Licensure and Certification. Generally, certain properties in our portfolio are subject to licensure, may require a certificate of need, or CON, or other certification through regulatory agencies in order to operate and participate in Medicare and Medicaid programs. Requirements pertaining to such licensure and certification relate to the quality of care provided by the operator, qualifications of the operator’s staff and continuing compliance with applicable laws and regulations. In addition, CON laws and regulations may place restrictions on certain activities such as the addition of beds at our facilities and changes in ownership. Failure to obtain a license, CON or other certification, or revocation, suspension or restriction of such required license, CON or other certification, could adversely impact our properties’ operations and their ability to generate revenue from services provided. State CON laws are not uniform throughout the United States and are subject to change. We cannot predict the impact of state CON laws on our facilities or the operations of our tenants.
Compliancecash with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Under the Americans with Disabilities Actintention of 1990, as amended, or the ADA, all public accommodations must meet federal requirements for access and use by disabled persons. Additional federal, state and local laws also may require modifications to our properties or restrict our ability to renovate our properties. We cannot predict the cost of compliance with the ADA or other legislation. We may incur substantial costs to comply with the ADA or any other legislation.obtaining
Government Environmental Regulationdebt financing at a later time. We have also used, and Private Litigation. Environmental lawsmay continue to use, derivative financial instruments such as fixed interest rate swaps and regulations holdcaps to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements.
We seek to obtain financing on the most favorable terms available to us liable forand refinance assets during the coststerm of removala loan only in limited circumstances, such as when a decline in interest rates makes it beneficial to prepay an existing loan, when an existing loan matures or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances which may be on our properties. These laws could impose liability without regard to whether we are responsible for the presence or release of the hazardous materials. Government investigations and remediation actions may have substantial costsif an attractive investment becomes available and the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in personal injury or similar claims by private plaintiffs. Various laws also impose liability on a person who arranges forproceeds from the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances and such person often must incur the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous substances at the disposal or treatment facility. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. As the owner of our properties, we mayrefinancing can be deemed to have arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances.
Issuing Securities for Property
Subject to limitations contained in our organizational and governance documents, we may issue, or cause to be issued, shares of our stock or limited partnership units in our operating partnership in any manner (and on such terms and for such consideration) in exchange for real estate. Our existing stockholders have no preemptive rightsused to purchase such sharesinvestment. The benefits of refinancing may include increased cash flows resulting from reduced debt service requirements, an increase in distributions from proceeds of the refinancing and an increase in diversification and assets owned if all or a portion of the refinancing proceeds are reinvested.
If we incur mortgage indebtedness, we will endeavor to obtain level payment financing, meaning that the amount of debt service payable would be substantially the same each year, although some mortgages are likely to provide for one large payment and we may incur floating or adjustable rate financing when our stock or limited partnership units in any such offering, and any such offering might cause a dilution of a stockholder’s initial investment.
In orderboard determines it to induce the contributors of such properties to accept unitsbe in our operating partnership, rather than cash, in exchange for their properties, itbest interest.
Dispositions
We have disposed, and may continue to dispose, of assets. We will determine whether a particular property or real estate-related investment should be necessary for us to provide them additional incentives. For instance, our operating partnership’s partnership agreement provides that any holdersold or otherwise disposed of units may exchange limited partnership units on a one-for-one basis for shares of our common stock, or, at our option, cash equal to the value of an equivalent number of shares of our common stock. We may, however, enter into additional contractual arrangements with contributors of property under which we would agree to repurchase a contributor’s units for shares of our common stock or cash, at the optionafter consideration of the contributor, at set times. In order to allowrelevant factors, including prevailing economic conditions, with a contributor of a property to defer taxable gain on the contribution of property toview toward maximizing our operating partnership, we might agree not to sell a contributed property for a defined period of time or until the contributor exchanged the contributor’s units for cash or shares of our common stock. Such an agreement would prevent us from selling those properties, even if market conditions made such a sale favorable to us. Although we may enter into such transactions with other existing or future American Healthcare Investors or Griffin Capital programs, we do not currentlyinvestment objectives. We intend to do so. Ifhold each property or real estate-related investment we were to enter into such a transaction withacquire for an entity managed by one of our co-sponsors or its affiliates, we would be subject to the risks described in Item 1A, Risk Factors — Investment Risks. We may acquire assets from, or dispose of assets to, affiliates of our advisor,extended period. However, circumstances might arise which could result in us entering into transactions on less favorable terms than we would receive from a third partyshortened holding period for certain investments. A property or that negatively affectreal estate-related investment may be sold before the public’s perceptionend of us.the expected holding period if: (i) diversification benefits exist associated with disposing of the investment and rebalancing our investment portfolio; (ii) an opportunity arises to pursue a more attractive investment; (iii) the value of the investment might decline; (iv) with respect to properties, a major tenant involuntarily liquidates or is in default under its lease; (v) the investment was acquired as part of a portfolio acquisition and does not meet our general acquisition criteria; (vi) an opportunity exists to enhance overall investment returns by raising capital through sale of the investment; or (vii) the sale of the investment is in our best interest and the best interests of our stockholders.
The determination of whether a particular property or real estate-related investment should be sold or otherwise disposed of will be made after consideration of the relevant factors, including prevailing economic conditions, with a view toward maximizing our investment objectives.
Terms of Leases
The terms and conditions of any lease we enter into with our tenants may vary substantially from those we describe in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.substantially. However, we expect that a majority of our tenant leases will require the tenant to pay or reimburse us for some or all of the operating expenses of the building based on the tenant’s proportionate share of rentable space within the building. Operating expenses typically include, but are not limited to, real estate and other taxes, utilities, insurance and building repairs, and other building operation and management costs. WeFor our multi-tenanted properties, we generally expect to be responsible for the replacement of specificcertain capital improvements affecting a property, including structural components of a property such as the roof of thea building or theand other capital improvements such as parking lot.facilities. We expect that many of our tenant leases will have terms of five or more years, some of which may have renewal options.
Significant Tenant
For a discussionSubstantially all of our significant tenant, see Note 18, Concentrationleases with residents at our SHOP and integrated senior health campuses are for a term of Credit Risk,one year or less, which creates the opportunity for operators to adjust rents to reflect current market conditions.
Joint Ventures
We have entered into, and we may continue to enter into, joint ventures, general partnerships and other arrangements with one or more institutions or individuals, including real estate developers, operators, owners, investors and others, for the Consolidated Financial Statementspurpose of acquiring real estate. Our investment in Trilogy is an example of a joint venture into which we have entered. Such joint ventures may be leveraged with debt financing or unleveraged. We have entered into, and may continue to enter into, joint ventures to further diversify our investments or to access investments which meet our investment criteria that arewould otherwise be unavailable to us. In determining whether to invest in a part ofparticular joint venture, we will evaluate the real estate that such joint venture owns or is being formed to own under the same criteria described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K for the selection of our other properties. However, we will not participate in tenant-in-common syndications or transactions.
Joint ventures with unaffiliated third parties may be structured such that the investment made by us and the other joint venture party are on substantially different terms and conditions. This type of investment structure may result in the other joint venture party receiving more of the cash flows, including appreciation, of an investment than we would receive, or may result in certain conflict of interest. See Item 1A, Risk Factors — Risks Related to Joint Ventures, for a further discussion.
Real Estate-Related Investments
In addition to our acquisition of properties, we have invested on an infrequent and opportunistic basis, and may continue to invest, in real estate-related investments, including loans and securities investments.
Investments in Real Estate Mortgages
We have invested, and we may continue to invest, in first and second mortgage loans, mezzanine loans and bridge loans. However, we will not make or invest in any loans that are subordinate to any mortgage or equity interest of any of our directors or affiliates. We also may invest in participations in mortgage loans. Second mortgage loans are secured by second deeds of trust on real property that is already subject to prior mortgage indebtedness. A mezzanine loan is a loan made in respect of certain real property but is secured by a lien on the ownership interests of the entity that, directly or indirectly, owns the real property. A bridge loan is short-term financing for an individual or business, until the next stage of financing can be obtained. Mortgage participation investments are investments in partial interests of mortgages of the type described above that are made and administered by third-party mortgage lenders. We may also make seller financing loans in connection with the disposition of our properties. In evaluating prospective loan investments, we consider factors, including, but not limited to: (i) the ratio of the investment amount to the underlying property’s value; (ii) current and projected cash flows of the property; (iii) the degree of liquidity of the investment; (iv) the quality, experience and creditworthiness of the borrower; and (v) in the case of mezzanine loans, the ability to acquire the underlying real property.
Our criteria for making or investing in loans are substantially the same as those involved in our investment in properties. We do not intend to make loans to other persons, to underwrite securities of other issuers or to engage in the purchase and sale of any types of investments other than those relating to real estate. We generally will not make or invest in mortgage loans on any one property if the aggregate amount of all mortgage loans outstanding on the property, including our loan, would exceed an amount equal to 85.0% of the appraised value of the property, as determined by an appraiser, unless we find substantial justification due to other underwriting criteria; however, our policy generally will be that the aggregate amount of all mortgage loans outstanding on the property, including our loan, would not exceed 75.0% of the appraised value of the property. We may find such justification in connection with the purchase of loans in cases in which we believe there is a high probability of our foreclosure upon the property in order to acquire the underlying assets and in which the cost of the loan investment does not exceed the fair market value of the underlying property. We will not invest in or make loans unless an appraisal has been obtained concerning the underlying property, except for those loans insured or guaranteed by a government or government agency or in connection with seller financing loans. In the event the transaction is with any of our directors or their respective affiliates, the appraisal will be obtained from a certified independent appraiser to support its determination of fair market value. In addition, we will seek to obtain a customary lender’s title insurance policy or commitment as to the priority of the mortgage or condition of the title. Because the factors considered, including the specific weight we place on each factor, will vary for each prospective loan investment, we do not, and are not able to, assign a specific weight or level of importance to any particular factor.
We will evaluate all potential loan investments to determine if the security for the loan and the loan-to-value ratio meets our investment criteria and objectives. Most loans that we will consider for investment would provide for monthly payments of interest, and some may also provide for principal amortization, although many loans of the nature that we will consider provide for payments of interest only and a payment of principal in full at the end of the loan term. We will not originate loans with negative amortization provisions.
We are not limited as to the amount of our assets that may be invested in mezzanine loans, bridge loans and second mortgage loans. However, we recognize that these types of loans are riskier than first deeds of trust or first priority mortgages on income-producing, fee-simple properties, and we expect to minimize the amount of these types of loans in our portfolio. We will evaluate the fact that these types of loans are riskier in determining the rate of interest on the loans. We do not have any policy that limits the amount that we may invest in any single loan or the amount we may invest in loans to any one borrower. We have not established a portfolio turnover policy with respect to loans we invest in or originate.
Investment in Other Securities
We have invested, and may continue to invest, in debt securities such as commercial mortgage-backed securities issued by other unaffiliated real estate companies. We may also invest in equity securities of public or private real estate companies. Commercial mortgage-backed securities are securities that evidence interests in, or are secured by, a single commercial mortgage loan or a pool of commercial mortgage loans. Commercial mortgage-backed securities generally are pass-through certificates that represent beneficial ownership interests in common law trusts whose assets consist of defined portfolios of one or more commercial mortgage loans. They typically are issued in multiple tranches whereby the more senior classes are entitled to priority distributions from the trust’s income. Losses and other shortfalls from expected amounts to be received in the mortgage pool are borne by the most subordinate classes, which receive payments only after the more senior classes have received all principal and/or interest to which they are entitled. Commercial mortgage-backed securities are subject to all of the risks of the underlying mortgage loans. We may invest in investment grade and non-investment grade commercial mortgage-backed securities.
The specific number and mix of securities in which we invest will depend upon real estate market conditions, other circumstances existing at the time we are investing in securities and the amount of any future indebtedness that we may incur. We will not invest in securities of other issuers for the purpose of exercising control, and the first or second mortgages in which we intend to invest will likely not be insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs or otherwise guaranteed or insured. Real estate-related equity securities are generally unsecured and also may be subordinated to other obligations of the issuer. Our investments in real estate-related equity securities will involve special risks relating to the particular issuer of the equity securities, including the financial condition and business outlook of the issuer.
Financing Policies
We have used, and intend to continue to use, secured and unsecured debt as a means of providing additional funds for the acquisition of properties and real estate-related investments. Our ability to enhance our investment returns and to increase our diversification by acquiring assets using additional funds provided through borrowing could be adversely impacted if banks and other lending institutions reduce the amount of funds available for the types of loans we seek. When interest rates are high or financing is otherwise unavailable on a timely basis, we may purchase certain assets for cash with the intention of obtaining
debt financing at a later time. We have also used, and may continue to use, derivative financial instruments such as fixed interest rate swaps and caps to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements.
We seek to obtain financing on the most favorable terms available to us and refinance assets during the term of a loan only in limited circumstances, such as when a decline in interest rates makes it beneficial to prepay an existing loan, when an existing loan matures or if an attractive investment becomes available and the proceeds from the refinancing can be used to purchase such investment. The benefits of refinancing may include increased cash flows resulting from reduced debt service requirements, an increase in distributions from proceeds of the refinancing and an increase in diversification and assets owned if all or a portion of the refinancing proceeds are reinvested.
If we incur mortgage indebtedness, we will endeavor to obtain level payment financing, meaning that the amount of debt service payable would be substantially the same each year, although some mortgages are likely to provide for one large payment and we may incur floating or adjustable rate financing when our board determines it to be in our best interest.
Dispositions
We have disposed, and may continue to dispose, of assets. We will determine whether a particular property or real estate-related investment should be sold or otherwise disposed of after consideration of the relevant factors, including prevailing economic conditions, with a view toward maximizing our investment objectives. We intend to hold each property or real estate-related investment we acquire for an extended period. However, circumstances might arise which could result in a shortened holding period for certain investments. A property or real estate-related investment may be sold before the end of the expected holding period if: (i) diversification benefits exist associated with disposing of the investment and rebalancing our investment portfolio; (ii) an opportunity arises to pursue a more attractive investment; (iii) the value of the investment might decline; (iv) with respect to properties, a major tenant involuntarily liquidates or is in default under its lease; (v) the investment was acquired as part of a portfolio acquisition and does not meet our general acquisition criteria; (vi) an opportunity exists to enhance overall investment returns by raising capital through sale of the investment; or (vii) the sale of the investment is in our best interest and the best interests of our stockholders.
The determination of whether a particular property or real estate-related investment should be sold or otherwise disposed of will be made after consideration of the relevant factors, including prevailing economic conditions, with a view toward maximizing our investment objectives.
Tax Status and Distribution Policy
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2016. We believe that we have been organized and operated, and we intend to continue to operate, in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code. Our qualification as a REIT, and maintenance of such qualification, will depend on our ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various complex requirements under the Code relating to, among other things, the sources of our gross income, the composition and values of our assets, our distribution levels and the concentration of ownership of our stock.
As a REIT, we generally are not subject to U.S. federal income tax on the REIT taxable income that we currently distribute to our stockholders. Under the Code, REITs are subject to numerous organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that they distribute annually at least 90.0% of their REIT taxable income to their stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any calendar year and do not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, our REIT taxable income would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the regular corporate rate, and we would likely be precluded from qualifying for treatment as a REIT until the fifth calendar year following the year in which we fail to qualify. Accordingly, our failure to qualify as a REIT could have a material adverse effect on us. Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may still be subject to certain U.S. federal, state and local taxes on our income and assets and to U.S. federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed REIT taxable income. In addition, subject to maintaining our qualification as a REIT, a portion of our business has been, and is likely to continue to be, conducted through, and a portion of our income may be earned in, one or more TRSs that are themselves subject to regular corporate income taxation.
We cannot predict if we will generate sufficient cash flows to continue to pay cash distributions to our stockholders on an ongoing basis or at all. The amount of any cash distributions is determined by our board and depends on the amount of distributable funds, current and projected cash requirements, tax considerations, any limitations imposed by the terms of indebtedness we may incur, as well as other factors. If our investments produce sufficient cash flows, we expect to continue paying distributions to our stockholders as determined at the discretion of our board. Because our cash available for distribution in any year may be less than 90.0% of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains, for the year, we may be required to borrow money, use proceeds from the issuance of securities (in subsequent offerings, if any) or sell assets to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the distribution requirement. These methods of obtaining funds could affect future distributions by increasing operating costs. We did not establish any limit on the amount of net proceeds from the initial offering or
borrowings that may be used to fund distributions, except that, in accordance with our organizational documents and Maryland law, we may not make distributions that would: (i) cause us to be unable to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; or (ii) cause our total assets to be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus senior liquidation preferences.
To the extent that any distributions to our stockholders are paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, such distributions are taxable as ordinary income. To the extent that any of our distributions exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits, such amounts constitute a return of capital to our stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes and thereafter will constitute capital gain. Any portion of distributions to our stockholders paid from net offering proceeds or borrowings will be treated in the same manner.
Our board shall authorize distributions, if any, on a quarterly basis. The amount of distributions we pay to our stockholders is determined by our board and is dependent on a number of factors, including funds available for the payment of distributions, our financial condition, capital expenditure requirements, annual distribution requirements needed to maintain our status as a REIT under the Code and restrictions imposed by our organizational documents and Maryland Law.
See Part II, Item 5, Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities — Distributions, for a further discussion of distributions approved by our board.
Competition
We compete with many other entities engaged in real estate investment activities for acquisitions and dispositions of OM buildings, SNFs, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities. Our ability to successfully compete is impacted by economic trends, availability of acceptable investment opportunities, our ability to negotiate beneficial investment terms, availability and cost of capital, construction and development costs and applicable laws and regulations.
Income from our investments is dependent on the ability of our tenants and operators to compete with other healthcare operators. These operators compete on a local and regional basis for patients and residents, and the operators’ ability to successfully attract and retain patients and residents depends on key factors such as the number of properties in the local market, the quality of the affiliated health system, proximity to hospital campuses, the price and range of services available, the scope and quality of care, reputation, age and appearance of each property, demographic trends and the cost of care in each locality. Additionally, referral sources, including physicians and managed care organizations, may change their lists of hospitals or physicians to which they refer patients or that are permitted to participate in a payor program. As a result, we may have to provide rent concessions, incur charges for tenant improvements or offer other inducements, or we may be unable to timely lease vacant space in our properties, all of which may have an adverse impact on our results of operations. Private, federal and state payment programs and the effect of other laws and regulations may also have a significant impact on the ability of our tenants and operators to compete successfully for patients and residents at our properties. For additional information on the risks associated with our business, please see Item 1A, Risk Factors.
Government Regulations
Our properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, and changes in these laws and regulations, or their interpretation by agencies, occur frequently. Further, our tenants and our healthcare facility operators, including our TRS entities that own and operate our properties under a RIDEA structure, are typically subject to extensive and complex federal, state and local healthcare laws and regulations relating to quality of care, government reimbursement, fraud and abuse practices and similar laws governing the operation of healthcare facilities, and we expect the healthcare industry, in general, will continue to face increased regulation and pressure in the areas of healthcare management, fraud and provision of services, among others. If we fail to comply with these various requirements, we may incur governmental fines or private damage awards. While we believe that our properties are and will be in substantial compliance with all of these regulatory requirements, we do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether future requirements will require us to make significant unanticipated capital expenditures that will adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. We believe, based in part on third-party due diligence reports which are generally obtained at the time we acquire the properties, that all of our properties comply in all material respects with current regulations. However, if we were required to make significant expenditures under applicable regulations, we could be materially and adversely affected.
Privacy and Security Laws and Regulations
There are various federal and state privacy laws and regulations that provide for consumer protection of personal health information, particularly electronic security and privacy. Compliance with such laws and regulations may require us to, among other things, conduct additional risk analysis, modify our risk management plan, implement new policies and procedures and conduct additional training. We are generally dependent on our tenants and management companies to fulfill our compliance obligations, and we have in certain circumstances developed a program to periodically monitor compliance with such obligations. However, there can be no assurance we would not be required to alter one or more of our systems and data security
procedures to be in compliance with these laws. If we fail to adequately protect health information, we could be subject to civil or criminal liability and adverse publicity, which could harm our business and impact our ability to attract new tenants and residents. We may be required to notify individuals, as well as government agencies and the media, if we experience a data breach. See Item 1C, Cybersecurity, below for a further discussion.
Healthcare Licensure and Certification
Generally, certain properties in our portfolio are subject to licensure, may require a certificate of need, or CON, or other certification through regulatory agencies in order to operate and participate in Medicare and Medicaid programs. Requirements pertaining to such licensure and certification relate to the quality of care provided by the operator, qualifications of the operator’s staff and continuing compliance with applicable laws and regulations. In addition, CON laws and regulations may place restrictions on certain activities such as the addition of beds/units at our facilities and changes in ownership. Failure to obtain a license, CON or other certification, or revocation, suspension or restriction of such required license, CON or other certification, could adversely impact our properties’ operations and their ability to generate revenue from services provided. State CON laws are not uniform throughout the United States and are subject to change. We cannot predict the impact of state CON laws on our facilities or the operations of our tenants.
Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, or the ADA, all public accommodations must meet federal requirements for access and use by disabled persons. Additional federal, state and local laws also may require modifications to our properties or restrict our ability to renovate our properties. We cannot predict the cost of compliance with the ADA or other legislation. We may incur substantial costs to comply with the ADA or any other legislation.
Government Environmental Regulation and Private Litigation
Environmental laws and regulations hold us liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances which may be on our properties. These laws could impose liability without regard to whether we are responsible for the presence or release of the hazardous materials. Government investigations and remediation actions may have substantial costs, and the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in personal injury or similar claims by private plaintiffs. Various laws also impose liability on a person who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances, and such person often must incur the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous substances at the disposal or treatment facility. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. As the owner of our properties, we may be deemed to have arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances.
Geographic Concentration
For a discussion of our geographic information, see Item 2, Properties — Geographic Diversification/Concentration Table, as well as Note 18, Segment Reporting, and Note 19, Concentration of Credit Risk, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Corporate Responsibility — Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
We are committed to conducting our business in a manner that benefits all of our stakeholders and ensures a lasting and positive impact from our operations. As a result, we measure our success not only by our ability to generate profits but also our ability to reduce our impact on the environment, affect positive social change in our community and conduct our operations in accordance with the highest ethical standards. To achieve this, we are developing a comprehensive ESG strategy and related ESG policy, to which we intend to adhere. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has been delegated the authority to provide oversight and guidance to our board regarding ESG trends and best practices. In particular, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall, as it deems appropriate, recommend changes to our company’s ESG practices as necessary to comply with existing legal requirements or emerging trends and best practices. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also shall periodically receive reports from management regarding our company’s ESG strategy, initiatives and policies. This ESG policy, which we intend to update regularly as applicable, is briefly summarized below and will be posted on our website, www.AmericanHealthcareREIT.com, and will contain more detailed information once available. Information contained on, or accessible through, our website is not incorporated by reference into and does not constitute a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Environmental Responsibility
Protecting the environment and pursuing strong environmental initiatives are integral to our company’s business. In 2022, we launched our ESG program and began conducting a materiality assessment to assist us in prioritizing our efforts and maximizing the efficacy of our program. We strive to consciously manage our operations in a way that minimizes our impact
Employees; Human Capital Resourceson the environment and promotes sustainability. At our headquarters, we leverage the latest technology to minimize our energy use, such as efficient and automated lighting systems, moderation, and monitoring of heating and air conditioning, and recycling paper, plastics, metals, and electronics. In addition, we encourage all of our employees to adopt sustainable best practices. For example, we promote the use of electronic communication over printing whenever possible and have implemented electronic approval systems. Our corporate office in California is located in a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (known as LEED) certified building. Within our portfolio, we work with tenants and operators to implement energy efficiency wherever possible, including light-emitting diode (known as LED) retrofitting and water conservation efforts.
In addition, we follow a policy of monitoring our properties for the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. While there can be no assurance that a material environmental liability does not exist at our properties, we are not currently aware of any environmental liability with respect to our properties that would have a material adverse effect on us. Further, we are not aware of any material environmental liability or any unasserted claim or assessment with respect to an environmental liability that we believe would require additional disclosure or the recording of a loss contingency.
Social
Our People
As of December 31, 2023, we had approximately 110 employees, including 68 in Accounting and Finance, 15 in Asset Management, eight in Investments, four in Information Technology and three in Legal.
We believe our employees are our greatest asset, and we pride ourselves on the diversity they bring to our company. Because of this, we have noimplemented a number of programs to foster not only their professional growth, but also their growth as global citizens. All of our employees are provided with a comprehensive benefits and wellness package, which may include high-quality medical, dental, and vision insurance, life insurance, 401(k) matching, long-term incentive plans, educational grants, fitness programs and other benefits. We provide our employees, consultants and executive officers are all employees of one ofwith competitive compensation and, where applicable, opportunities for equity ownership through our co-sponsors. Our day-to-day management is performed by our advisorSecond Amended and its affiliates. Our advisor is led by an experienced team of senior real estate professionals who have significant experience in underwriting and structuring healthcare real estate transactions and managing healthcare real estate and real estate-related investments. We benefit from our advisor's infrastructure and operating platform, through which we are able to source, evaluate and manage potential investments. We do not directly compensate our executive officers for services rendered to us. However, our executive officers, consultants and the executive officers and key employees of our advisor and its affiliates are eligible for awards pursuant to theRestated 2015 Incentive Plan, or the AHR Incentive Plan. See Note 13, Equity — Equity Compensation Plans — AHR Incentive Plan, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion.
We also believe that one of the keys to our incentive plan.success is our ability to benefit from a wide range of opinions and experiences. We believe the best way to accomplish this is through promoting racial, gender and generational diversity across all layers of our organization. As of December 31, 2020, no awards had been granted to our executive officers, consultants or the executive officers or key employees2023, 72.7% of our advisoremployees were minorities and 58.2% were female. Generationally, our organization was composed of 10.0% Generation Z, 37.3% Millennials, 48.2% Generation X and 4.5% Baby Boomers. To further assist us in establishing a work environment that promotes diversity, equity and inclusion, or its affiliates under thisDEI, for our employees, we have completed a DEI assessment of our organization and created a DEI action plan. We provided and will continue to provide DEI education, beginning with a virtual privilege walk for all employees and leadership training for executives. Additionally, as a part of our commitment to DEI, our board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee actively seek out qualified women and individuals from underrepresented communities as director nominees.
Health and Safety
We are committed to providing a safe and healthy workplace. We continuously strive to meet or exceed compliance with all laws, regulations and accepted practices pertaining to workplace safety. All employees and contractors are required to comply with established safety policies, standards and procedures. Our focus is on promoting employee health and safety and ensuring business continuity. As part of such efforts, we have maintained a telecommuting policy, providing our people with valued flexibility.
For our healthcare-related facilities operated pursuant to a RIDEA structure, which include our SHOP and integrated senior health campuses, we rely on each management company to attract and retain skilled personnel to provide services at our healthcare-related facilities. As
Governance
We believe maintaining a resultrigorous corporate governance framework is essential to the success of our organization, and we seek to adhere to policies and procedures that ensure transparency, accountability, oversight and risk minimization across all levels of our company. This includes numerous committees of our board, comprised solely of independent directors, which oversee a wide range of matters such as investment activities, executive compensation, ESG policies and conflict of interest related matters.
We have structured our corporate governance in a manner we believe closely aligns our interests with those of our stockholders. Notable features of our corporate governance structure include the following:
•our board is not classified and each of our directors is subject to election annually. Additionally, our charter provides that we may not elect to be subject to the provision of the COVID-19 pandemic, such management companiesMGCL that would permit us to classify our board, unless we receive prior approval from stockholders;
•we have put into place a numberfully independent audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees;
•at least one of healthour directors qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under applicable SEC regulations, and safety measures to enable their employees to continue to work from our healthcare-related facilities, includingall members of the procurement and distribution of PPE and the implementation of daily employee and resident health screenings, vaccination clinics for employees and residents, as well as aggressive safety protocolsAudit Committee are financially literate in accordance with the Centers for Disease ControlNYSE listing rules and Prevention,requirements;
•our board has opted out of the business combination statute in the MGCL (provided that such business combination is first approved by our board), and, pursuant to our bylaws, we have opted out of the control share acquisition statute in the MGCL;
•we do not have a stockholder rights plan and do not intend to adopt a stockholder rights plan in the future without (i) the approval of our stockholders or CDC, Centers for Medicare(ii) seeking ratification from our stockholders within 12 months of adoption of the plan if our board determines, in the exercise of the directors’ duties under applicable law, that it is in our best interests to adopt a rights plan without the delay of seeking prior stockholder approval; and Medicaid Services, or CMS,
•our Corporate Governance Guidelines adopted by our board require our directors and local health agency guidelinesofficers to limit the exposure and spreadown certain minimum amounts of COVID-19. While the health and safety measures instituted by each management company have allowed facilities to operate during the pandemic, these facilities may face challenges created by workforce shortages and absenteeism due to COVID-19.our common stock.
Investment Company Act Considerations
We conduct, and intend to continue to conduct, our operations, and the operations of our operating partnership and any other subsidiaries, so that no such entity meets the definition of an “investment company” under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act. We primarily engage in the business of investing in real estate assets; however, our portfolio maydoes include, to a much lesser extent, other real estate-related investments. We have also acquired, and may continue to acquire, real estate assets through investments in joint venture entities, including joint venture entities in which we may not own a controlling interest. We anticipate that our assets generally will be held in our wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries, of the company, each formed to hold a particular asset. We monitor our operations and our assets on an ongoing basis in order to ensure that neither we, nor any of our subsidiaries, meet the definition of “investment company” under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act. Among other things, we monitor the proportion of our portfolio that is placed in investments in securities.
Information About Industry Segments
We segregate our operations into reporting segments in order to assess the performance of our business in the same way that management reviews our performance and makes operating decisions. During the quarter ended December 31, 2023, we modified how we evaluate our business and make resource allocations, and therefore determined that we operate through four reportable business segments: integrated senior health campuses, outpatient medical, or OM, (which was formerly known as medical office buildings, or MOBs), triple-net leased properties and SHOP. All segment information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been recast for all periods presented to reflect four reportable business segments and the change in segment name from MOBs to OM.
Integrated Senior Health Campuses
Integrated senior health campuses are a valuable component of our portfolio because of their ability to provide a continuum of care as residents require increasing levels of care. As of December 31, 2020,2023, we owned and/or operated through four reportable business125 integrated senior health campuses. These facilities allow residents to “age-in-place” by providing independent living, assisted living, memory care, skilled nursing and certain ancillary services, all within a single campus setting. Integrated senior health campuses predominantly focus on need-driven segments — medical office buildings,of senior housing, senior housing — RIDEAcare (i.e., assisted living, memory care and skilled nursing facilities.nursing) and charge market rents in lieu of entry fees, as is commonly the case with continuing care retirement communities. Predominantly all of our integrated senior health campuses are operated utilizing a RIDEA structure, allowing us to participate in the upside from any improved operational performance while bearing the risk of any decline in operating performance.
Outpatient Medical Office Buildings.
We value the stable and reliable cash flows our OM buildings provide our company, which we believe are particularly valuable during market disruptions and recessionary periods. As of December 31, 2020,2023, we owned 43 medical88 OM buildings that we lease to third parties. These properties are similar to commercial office buildings, or MOBs. These propertiesbut typically containrequire specialized infrastructure to accommodate physicians’ offices and examination rooms, and may also includeas well as some ancillary uses, including pharmacies, hospital ancillary service space and outpatient services, such as diagnostic centers, rehabilitation clinics and day-surgeryoutpatient-surgery operating rooms. While these properties are similar to commercial officeOur OM buildings they require additional parking spaces as well as plumbing, electrical and mechanical systems to accommodate multiple exam rooms that may require sinks in every room and special equipment such as x-ray machines. In addition, MOBs are often built to accommodate higher structural loads for certain equipment and may contain other specialized construction. Our MOBs are typically multi-tenant properties leased to healthcare providers (hospitals and physician practices) under leases that generally provide for approximately threerecovery of certain operating expenses and certain capital expenditures and have initial terms of five to ten years. 10 years with fixed annual rent escalations (historically ranging from 2% to 3% per year).
Senior Housing Operating Properties
Our MOBsSHOP segment accountedhas the potential for approximately 42.2%, 45.1%embedded growth through the ongoing recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and 40.7% of total revenues and grant income for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Senior Housing. demand growth from an aging U.S. population. As of December 31, 2020,2023, we owned 14and operated an aggregate 55 senior housing facilities. Senior housingand skilled nursing facilities in our SHOP segment. Such facilities cater to different segments of the elderly population based upon their personal needs and include independent living, assisted living, memory care and independent living.or skilled nursing services. Residents of assisted living facilities typically require limited medical care andbut need assistance with eating, bathing, dressing and/or medication management and those services can be provided by staff at the facility. Resident programs offered at such facilities may include transportation, social activities and exercise and fitness programs.management. Services provided by our tenants inoperators at these facilities are primarily paid for by the residents directly or through private insurance and are therefore less reliant on government reimbursement programs, such as Medicaid and Medicare. Our senior housingThe facilities in our SHOP segment are leasedoperated utilizing RIDEA structures, allowing us to single tenants under triple-net lease structures, whereby the tenant is responsible for making rent payments, maintaining the properties and paying taxes and other expenses. Leases are typically 12 to 15 years with annual escalations and required lease coverage ratios.
Our senior housing segment accounted for approximately 5.7%, 7.0% and 10.6% of total revenues and grant income for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Senior Housing — RIDEA. As of December 31, 2020, we owned and operated 26 senior housing facilities utilizing a RIDEA structure. Such facilities are of a similar property type as our senior housing segment discussed above; however, we have entered into agreements with healthcare operators to manage the facilities on our behalf utilizing a RIDEA structure. The healthcare operators we engage provide management and operational services at the facility and we retain the net earnings generated by the performance of the facility after payment of the management fee and other operational and maintenance expenses. As a result, under a RIDEA structure we retainparticipate in the upside from any improved operational performance and similarlywhile bearing the risk of any decline in operating performance. Substantially all of our leases with residents in the
Triple-Net Leased Properties
Our triple-net leased properties segment includes senior housing, skilled nursing facilities are for a term of one yearand hospitals. We lease such properties to tenants under triple-net or less. Our senior housing — RIDEA segment accounted for approximately 44.4%, 38.2%absolute-net leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and 43.6% of total revenues and grant income for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.capital expenditures.
Skilled Nursing Facilities.As of December 31, 2020,2023, we owned 11 skilled nursing facilities, or SNFs. Skilled nursing facility15 SNFs within our triple-net leased properties segment that we lease to third parties. SNF residents are generally higher acuity and need assistance with eating, bathing, dressing and/or require assistance with medication management and also require available 24-hour nursing care. SNFs offer restorative, rehabilitative and custodial nursing care for people who cannot live independently but do not requiringrequire the more extensive and sophisticated treatment available at hospitals. Ancillary revenues and revenues from sub-acute care services are derived from providing services to residents beyond room and board and include occupational, physical, speech, respiratory and intravenous therapy, wound care, oncology treatment, brain injury care, orthopedic therapy and other services. Certain SNFs provide some of the foregoing services on an out-patient basis. Skilled nursing services provided by our tenants in these SNFs are primarily paid for either by private sources or through the Medicare and Medicaid programs. OurEach SNF is leased to a single tenant under a triple-net lease, with an initial term typically ranging from 12 to 15 years, fixed annual rent escalations (historically ranging from 2% to 3% per year) and requiring minimum lease coverage ratios. We commonly structure SNFs areunder a master lease with multiple facilities in order to diversify our master tenant’s sources of rent and mitigate risk. We typically focus on SNF investments in states that require a CON in order to develop new SNFs, which we believe reduces the risk of over-supply.
As of December 31, 2023, we owned 11 senior housing facilities within our triple-net leased properties segment that we lease to third parties. Each facility is leased to a single tenant under a triple-net lease structure with an initial term typically ranging from approximately 12 to 15 year termsyears, fixed annual rent escalations (historically ranging from 2% to 3% per year) and requiring minimum lease coverage ratios. Such assets are commonly leased under a single master lease covering multiple facilities in order to diversify a master tenant’s sources of rent and mitigate risk.
As of December 31, 2023, we have one wholly-owned hospital and one hospital in which we own an approximately 90.6% interest within our triple-net leased properties segment. Services provided by operators and tenants in our hospitals are paid for by private sources, third-party payors (e.g., insurance and health maintenance organizations) or through the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Our hospital properties include acute care, long-term acute care, specialty and rehabilitation services that are leased to single tenants or operators under triple-net lease structures with an initial term ranging from 21 to 29 years and fixed annual rent escalations. Our SNFs segment accounted for approximately 7.7%, 9.7% and 5.1% of total revenues and grant income for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.escalations (historically ranging from 2% to 6% per year).
For a further discussion of our segment reporting for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018,2021, see Item 2, Properties, Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Note 17,18, Segment Reporting, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.Factors
Investing in our common stock involves risks. Our stockholders should carefully consider the risk factors below, together with all of the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included herein. If any of these risks were to occur, our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and prospects and our ability to service our debt and make distributions to our stockholders at a particular rate, or at all, could be materially and adversely affected (which we refer to collectively as “materially and adversely affecting us” or having “a material adverse effect on us” and comparable phrases).
Risk Factor Summary
Our business, financial condition and results of operations are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. Below is a summary of the principal factors that make an investment in our common stock speculative or risky. This summary does not address all of the risks that we face and should be read in conjunction with the full risk factors contained below in this “Risk Factors” section in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Investment Risks
•There is no public market for shares of our common stock, making it difficult for stockholders to sell their shares.
•Distributions paid using borrowings or other sources in anticipation of cash flows may negatively impact the value of our stockholders’ investment.
•The estimated value per share of our common stock may not accurately reflect the fair value of our assets and liabilities.
•The prior performance of other programs may not accurately predict our ability to achieve our investment objectives or our future results.
•Our success is dependent on our co-sponsors; however, our co-sponsors and their key personnel face conflicts of interest for their time and fiduciary duties.
•Our advisor may be entitled to receive significant compensation in the event of our liquidation or the termination of the Advisory Agreement.
•Even though we have formed a special committee to investigate strategic alternatives, we are not obligated to effectuate a liquidity event; therefore, our stockholders may have to hold their investment in shares of our common stock for an indefinite period of time.
Risks Related to Our Business and Financial Results
•In light of the adverse impact of the COVID-19 pandemicWe are dependent on tenants for our business operationsrevenue, and cash flows, we reduced distribution paymentslease terminations could reduce our ability to our stockholders and suspended our share repurchase plan, and there is no assurance as to when we will be able to increase the amount ofmake distributions to our stockholders or reinstate our share repurchase plan, if at all. stockholders.
•Senior housing — RIDEA facilities managed by Meridian Senior Living, LLC,The financial deterioration, insolvency or Meridian, account for a significant portionbankruptcy of one or more of our revenues and/major tenants, operators, borrowers or operating income and adverse developments in Meridian’s business or financial conditionother obligors could have a material adverse effect on us.
•We have rightsexperienced net losses in the past and we may experience additional losses in the future.
•Our prior performance may not be an accurate predictor of our ability to terminateachieve our management agreements with third-party operatorsbusiness objectives or of our future results.
•Our success is dependent on the performance and continued contributions of certain of our key personnel, and, in the event they are no longer employed by us, we could be materially and adversely affected.
•All of our integrated senior health campuses are managed by Trilogy Management Services, LLC, or the Trilogy Manager, and account for a significant portion of our senior housingrevenues and senior housing — RIDEA facilities under any circumstances; however, any inability to replaceoperating income. Adverse developments in the Trilogy Manager’s business or delay in replacing third-party operators as the managers of such facilitiesfinancial strength could have a material adverse effect on us.
•Internalizing our management functions could cause us to incur significant costs.
•We may incur additional costs in re-leasing properties, which could adversely affect our cash flows.
Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest
•We may acquire assets from, or dispose of assets to, affiliates of our advisor, which could result in us entering into transactions on less favorable terms than we would receive from an unaffiliated third party.
•We have entered, and may continue to enter, into joint ventures which could cause conflicts of interest or disagreements with our joint venture partners.
Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure
•Several potential events, our ability to issue preferred stock and the percentage limit on shares of common stock that any person may own could cause our stockholders’ investment in us to be diluted or prevent a sale of our common stock.
•Our stockholders’ ability to control our operations is severely limited.
•If we become subject to registration under the Investment Company Act, we may not be able to continue our business.
•We are an “emerging growth company” under the federal securities laws and will be subject to reduced public company reporting requirements.
Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate
•Uncertain market conditions could lead our acquired real estate investments to decrease in value or may cause us to sell our properties at a loss in the future.
•Non-renewals, terminations or lease defaults by any tenants that account for more than 10.0%Most of our total property portfolio’s annualized base rent or annualized netcosts, such as operating income, or NOI, could reduce our net income and have a negative effect on our abilitygeneral and administrative expenses, interest expense and real estate acquisition and construction costs, are subject to pay distributions to our stockholders.inflation and may not be recoverable.
•AOur high concentrationconcentrations of our properties in a particular geographic area wouldareas magnify the effects of downturnsnegative conditions affecting those geographic areas.
•Our real estate investments may be concentrated in that geographic area.OM buildings, senior housing, SNFs or other healthcare-related facilities, making us more vulnerable to negative factors affecting these classes than if our investments were diversified beyond the healthcare industry.
•Our business, tenants, residents and operators may face litigation and experience rising liability and insurance costs, which may materially and adversely affect our financial condition.
•Delays in the acquisition, development, disposition and construction of real properties may have adverse effects on our results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
•Our stockholders may not receive any profits resulting from the sale of our properties, and representations made by us in connection with sales of our properties may subject us to liability.
•We face possible liability for environmental cleanup costs and damages for contamination related to properties we acquire.
•Our real estate investments may be too heavily concentrated in certain segments.
Risks Related to the Healthcare Industry
•New laws or regulations affecting the heavily regulated healthcare industry, changes to existing laws or regulations, loss of licensure or failure to obtain licensure could result in the inability of our tenants to make rent payments to us.
•Our tenants may be unable to make rent payments to us because of reductions in reimbursement from third-party payors and/or changes in the healthcare industry or regulations.
•Seniors delaying moving to senior housing facilities until they require greater care or forgoing moving to senior housing facilities altogether could have a material adverse effect on our business.
•Events that adversely affect the ability of seniors and their families to afford resident fees at our senior housing facilities could cause a decline in our occupancy rates, revenues and results of operations.
•Adverse trends in healthcare provider operations may negatively affect our lease revenues.
•We, our tenants and our operators for our skilled nursing and senior housing may be subject to various government reviews, audits and investigations that could adversely affect our business, such as identifying potential improper payments under the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
Risks Related to Debt Financing
•To the extent we borrow at fixed rates or enter into fixed interest rate swaps, we will not benefit from reduced interest expense if interest rates decrease.
•Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
•Interest-only indebtedness may increase our risk of default, adversely affect our ability to refinance or sell properties and eventually may reduce our funds available for distribution to our stockholders.
Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate-Related InvestmentsEstate
•UnfavorableUncertain market conditions could lead our real estate market conditions and delaysinvestments to decrease in liquidating defaulted mortgage loan investmentsvalue or may negatively impact mortgage loans we may invest in.
Federal Income Tax Risks
•Failure to maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes would subjectcause us to federal income tax onsell our taxable incomeproperties at regular corporate rates, which would substantially reduce our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.a loss in the future.
•Legislative or regulatory tax changes could adversely affect investors.
Investment Risks
There is no public market for the sharesMost of our common stock. Therefore, it will be difficult for our stockholders to sell their shares of our common stock and, if our stockholders are able to sell their shares of our common stock, they will likely sell them at a substantial discount.
We commenced a best efforts initial public offering on February 16, 2016 and terminated our initial offering on February 15, 2019. However, there currently is no public market for the shares of our common stock. We do not expect a public market for our stock to develop prior to the listing of the shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange, which we do not expect to occur in the near future and which may not occur at all. Additionally, our charter contains restrictions on the ownership and transfer of shares of our stock, and these restrictions may inhibit our stockholders’ ability to sell their shares of our common stock. Our charter provides that no person may own more than 9.9% in value of our issued and outstanding shares of capital stock or more than 9.9% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock. Any purported transfer of the shares of our common stock that would result in a violation of either of these limits will result in such shares being transferred to a trust for the benefit of a charitable beneficiary or such transfer being declared null and void. We have adopted a share repurchase plan, but it is limited in terms of the amount of shares of our common stock which may be repurchased annually, is subject to our board’s discretion and is currently suspended. On March 31, 2020, our board suspended our share repurchase plan with respect to all repurchase requests other than repurchases resulting from the death or qualifying disability of stockholders, beginning with share repurchase requests submitted for repurchase during the second quarter of 2020. Furthermore, in connection with our board’s strategic alternative review process and in order to facilitate a strategic transaction, on March 18, 2021, our board approved the suspension of our share repurchase plan with respect to all repurchase requests received by us after February 28, 2021, including repurchases resulting from the death or qualifying disability of stockholders. Therefore, it will be difficult for our stockholders to sell their shares of our common stock promptly or at all. If our stockholders are able to sell their shares of our common stock, our stockholders may only be able to sell them to an unrelated third party at a substantial discount from the price they paid. This may be the result, in part, of the fact that, at the time we made our investments, the amount of funds available for investment were reduced by up to 4.0% of the gross offering proceeds (excluding the 2.0% of the gross offering proceeds portion of the dealer manager fee funded by our advisor), which amounts were used to pay selling commissions and a dealer manager fee. We also were required to use gross offering proceeds to pay acquisition fees, acquisition expenses and asset management fees. Unless our aggregate investments increase in value to compensate for these fees and expenses, which may not occur, it is unlikely that our stockholders will be able to sell their shares of our common stock, whether pursuant to our share repurchase plan or otherwise, without incurring a substantial loss. We cannot assure our stockholders that their shares of our common stock will ever appreciate in value to equal the price our stockholders paid for their shares of our common stock. Therefore, shares of our common stock should be considered illiquid and a long-term investment, and our stockholders must be prepared to hold their shares of our common stock for an indefinite length of time.
We have paid a portion of distributions from the net proceeds of our initial offering and borrowings, and in the future, may continue to pay distributions from borrowings or from other sources in anticipation of future cash flows. Any such distributions may reduce the amount of capital we ultimately invest in assets and may negatively impact the value of our stockholders’ investment.
We have used the net proceeds from our initial offering, borrowings and certain fees payable to our advisor which have been waived, and in the future, may use borrowed funds or other sources, to pay cash distributions to our stockholders, which may reduce the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations, cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds or cause subsequent investors to experience dilution. Further, if the aggregate amount of cash distributed in any given year exceeds the amount of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, the excess amount will be deemed a return of capital. Therefore, distributions payable to our stockholders may partially include a return of capital, rather than a return on capital, and we have paid a portion of our distributions from the net proceeds of our initial offering. We have not established any limit on the amount of net proceeds from our initial offering or borrowings that may be used to fund distributions, except that, in accordance with our organizational documents and Maryland law, we may not make distributions that would: (i) cause us to be unable to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; or (ii) cause our total assets to be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus senior liquidation preferences. The actual amount and timing of distributions is determined by our board, in its sole discretion and typically depends on the amount of funds available for distribution, which depend on itemscosts, such as our financial condition, currentoperating and projected capital expenditure requirements, tax considerations and annual distribution requirements needed to maintain our qualification as a REIT. As a result, our distribution rate and payment frequency have varied and may continue to vary from time to time.
Prior to March 31, 2020, our board authorized, on a quarterly basis, a daily distribution to our stockholders of record as of the close of business on each day of the period commencing on May 1, 2016 and ending on March 31, 2020. The daily distributions were calculated based on 365 days in the calendar year and are equal to $0.001643836 per share of our Class T and Class I common stock, which is equal to an annualized distribution rate of $0.60 per share. These distributions were aggregated and paid monthly in arrears in cash or shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP Offerings, only from legally available funds.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and its effects to our business and operations, our board decided to take steps to protect our capital and maximize our liquidity in an effort to strengthen our long-term financial prospects. Consequently, on March 31, 2020, our board authorized a daily distribution to our stockholders of record as of the close of business day on each day of the period commencing on April 1, 2020 and ending on April 30, 2021, which were or will be calculated based on 365 days in the calendar year and are equal to $0.001095890 per share of our Class T and Class I common stock. Such daily distribution is equal to an annualized distribution rate of $0.40 per share. The distributions were or will be aggregated and paid in cash or shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP, on a monthly basis, in arrears, only from legally available funds. Furthermore, in response to the continued uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact to our portfolio of investments, on March 31, 2020, our board suspended our share repurchase plan with respect to all repurchase requests other than repurchases resulting from the death or qualifying disability of stockholders, beginning with share repurchase requests submitted for repurchase during the second quarter of 2020. See our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 3, 2020 for more information. See also our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 19, 2021 regarding our board’s suspension of the DRIP and share repurchase plan, including repurchase requests resulting from the death or qualifying disability of stockholders. For more information regarding the sources of our distributions for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, please see Part II, Item 5, Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities — Distributions section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The estimated value per share of our common stock may not be an accurate reflection of the fair value of our assets and liabilities and likely will not represent the amount of net proceeds that would result if we were liquidated, dissolved or completed a merger or other sale of our company. Additionally, between valuations it may be difficult to accurately reflect material events that may impact our estimated per share NAV.
On March 18, 2021, our board, at the recommendation of the audit committee of our board, which is comprised solely of independent directors, unanimously approved and established an updated estimated per share NAV of our common stock of $9.22. We provided this updated estimated per share NAV to assist broker-dealers in connection with their obligations under Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, Rule 2231 with respect to customer account statements. The valuation was performed in accordance with the methodology provided in the Practice Guideline 2013-01, Valuations of Publicly Registered Non-Listed REITs, issued by the Institute for Portfolio Alternatives, or the IPA, in April 2013, in addition to guidance from the SEC.
The updated estimated per share NAV was determined after consultation with our advisor and an independent third-party valuation firm, the engagement of which was approved by the audit committee. FINRA rules provide no guidance on the methodology an issuer must use to determine its estimated per share NAV. As with any valuation methodology, our independent valuation firm’s methodology was based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may not have been accurate or complete. Different parties with different assumptions and estimates could derive a different estimated per share NAV, and these differences could be significant.
The updated estimated per share NAV was not audited or reviewed by our independent registered public accounting firm and did not represent the fair value of our assets or liabilities according to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. In addition, the updated estimated per share NAV was an estimate as of a given point in time and the value of our shares will fluctuate over time as a result of, among other things, developments related to individual assets and changes in the real estate and capital markets. Accordingly, with respect to the updated estimated per share NAV, we can give no assurance that:
•a stockholder would be able to resell his or her shares at our updated estimated per share NAV;
•a stockholder would ultimately realize distributions per share equal to our updated estimated per share NAV upon liquidation of our assets and settlement of our liabilities or a sale of the company;
•our shares of common stock would trade at our updated estimated per share NAV on a national securities exchange;
•an independent third-party appraiser or other third-party valuation firm, other than the third-party valuation firm engaged by our board to assist in its determination of the updated estimated per share NAV, would agree with our estimated per share NAV; or
•the methodology used to estimate our updated per share NAV would be acceptable to FINRA or comply with reporting requirements under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, the Code, other applicable law, or the applicable provisions of a retirement plan or individual retirement account, or IRA.
Further, our board is ultimately responsible for determining the estimated per share NAV. Our independent valuation firm calculates estimates of the value of our assets, and our board then determines the net value of our assets and liabilities taking into consideration such estimate provided by the independent valuation firm. Since our board determines our estimated per share NAV at least annually, there may be changes in the value of our assets that are not fully reflected in the updated estimated per share NAV. As a result, the published estimated per share NAV may not fully reflect changes in value that may have occurred since the prior valuation. Furthermore, our advisor will monitor our portfolio, but it has been, and may continue to be, difficult to reflect changing market conditions or material events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, that may impact the value of our portfolio between valuations or our ability to obtain timely or complete information regarding any such events. Therefore, the estimated per share NAV published before and during the announcement of an extraordinary event may differ significantly from our actual per share NAV until such time as sufficient information is available and analyzed, the financial impact is fully evaluated, and the appropriate adjustment is made to our estimated per share NAV, as determined by our board.
For a full description of the methodologies used to value our assets and liabilities in connection with the calculation of the updated estimated per share NAV, see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 19, 2021.
We have experienced losses in the past and we may experience additional losses in the future.
Historically, we have experienced net losses (calculated in accordance with GAAP) and we may not be profitable or realize growth in the value of our investments. Many of our losses can be attributed to start-up costs, general and administrative expenses, depreciationinterest expense and amortization, as well asreal estate acquisition expenses incurred in connection with purchasing properties or making other investments. For a further discussion of our operational history and the factors affecting our losses, see Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussionconstruction costs, are subject to inflation and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto.
The prior performance of other programs sponsored or co-sponsored by American Healthcare Investors and Griffin Capital may not be an accurate predictor of our ability to achieve our investment objectives or our future results.
We were formed in January 2015 and did not engage in any material business operations prior to our initial offering. As a result, an investment in shares of our common stock may entail more risks than the shares of common stock of a REIT with a more substantial operating history. In addition, our stockholders should not rely on the past performance of other American Healthcare Investors or Griffin Capital-sponsored or co-sponsored programs to predict our future results. Our stockholders should consider our prospects in light of the risks, uncertainties and difficulties frequently encountered by companies like ours that do not have a substantial operating history, many of which may be beyond our control. For example, due to challenging
economic conditions in the past, distributions to stockholders of several private real estate programs sponsored by Griffin Capital were suspended. Therefore, to be successful in this market, we must, among other things:
•identify and acquire investments that further our investment strategy;recoverable.
•attract, integrate, motivate and retain qualified personnel to manage our day-to-day operations;Our high concentrations of properties in particular geographic areas magnify the effects of negative conditions affecting those geographic areas.
•respond to competition both for investment opportunities and potential investors’ investment in us; and
•build and expand our operational structure to support our business.
We cannot guarantee that we will succeed in achieving these goals, and our failure to do so could adversely affect our results of operations and cause our stockholders to lose all or a portion of their investment and adversely effect our results of operations.
Our success is dependent on the performance of our co-sponsors. Our co-sponsors and certain of their key personnel will face competing demands relating to their time or fiduciary duties and this may cause our operating results to suffer.
Our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to conduct our operations is dependent upon the performance of our advisor in identifying and acquiring investments, the determination of any financing arrangements, the asset management of our investments and the management of our day-to-day activities. Our advisor is a joint venture between our two co-sponsors, in which American Healthcare Investors indirectly owns a 75.0% interest and Griffin Capital indirectly owns a 25.0% interest.
American Healthcare Investors and its key personnel serve as key personnel and co-sponsor of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc., or GA Healthcare REIT III, and may sponsor or co-sponsor additional real estate programs in the future. Griffin Capital and certain of its key personnel and its respective affiliates serve as key personnel, advisors, managers and sponsors or co-sponsors of 11 Griffin Capital-sponsored programs, including GA Healthcare REIT III, Griffin Institutional Access Real Estate Fund and Griffin Institutional Access Credit Fund, and may have other business interests as well. Because these persons have competing demands on their time and resources, they may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between our business and these other activities. During times of intense activity in other programs and ventures, they may devote less time and fewer resources to our business than is necessary or appropriate. If this occurs, the returns on our stockholders’ investment may suffer. Also, since these individuals owe fiduciary duties to these other entities and their owners, which fiduciary duties may conflict with the duties that they owe to our stockholders and us, their loyalties to these other entities could result in actions or inactions that are detrimental to our business, which could harm the implementation of our investment objectives. Accordingly, competing demands of such key personnel may cause us to be unable to successfully implement our investment objectives or generate cash needed to make distributions to our stockholders, and to maintain or increase the value of our assets.
In addition, our success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of our advisor’s officers and certain of the managing directors, officers and employees of American Healthcare Investors, in particular Jeffrey T. Hanson, Danny Prosky and Mathieu B. Streiff, each of whom would be difficult to replace. Messrs. Hanson, Prosky and Streiff currently serve as our executive officers and/or directors and Mr. Hanson also serves as Chairman of our board. We currently do not have an employment agreement with any of Messrs. Hanson, Prosky or Streiff. In the event that Messrs. Hanson, Prosky or Streiff are no longer affiliated with American Healthcare Investors, for any reason, it could have a material adverse effect on our success and American Healthcare Investors may not be able to attract and hire equally capable individuals to replace Messrs. Hanson, Prosky and/or Streiff. We do not have key man life insurance on any of our co-sponsors’ key personnel. If our advisor or American Healthcare Investors were to lose the benefit of the experience, efforts and abilities of one or more of these individuals, our operating results could suffer. Furthermore, our co-sponsors’ ability to manage our operations successfully is impacted by trends in the general economy, as well as the commercial real estate and credit markets. The current macroeconomic environment may negatively impact the value of commercial real estate assets and contribute to a general slow-down in our industry, which could put downward pressure on our co-sponsors’ revenues and operating results. Since American Healthcare Investors is 47.1% owned by AHI Group Holdings and 45.1% indirectly owned by Colony Capital, our company may not realize the anticipated benefits of the relationship with Colony Capital due to, among other things, the economic and overall conditions of the healthcare real estate industry, conflicts of interests relating to the purchase and leasing of healthcare properties, or American Healthcare Investors and Colony Capital having overlapping interests that could exacerbate other potential conflicts or disputes. To the extent that any of these factors may cause a decline in our co-sponsors’ operating results or revenues, the performance of our advisorinvestments may be impacted andconcentrated in turn, our results of operations and financial condition could also suffer.
Our stockholders may be unable to sell their shares of our common stock because our share repurchase plan is subject to significant restrictions and limitations.
Our share repurchase plan includes significant restrictions and limitations. Except in cases of death or qualifying disability, our stockholders must hold their shares of our common stock for at least one year. Our stockholders must present at least 25.0% of their shares of our common stock for repurchase and until they have held their shares of our common stock for at least four years, repurchases will be made for less than our stockholders paid for their shares of our common stock. Shares of our common stock may be repurchased quarterly, at our discretion, on a pro rata basis, and are limited during any calendar year to 5.0% of the weighted average number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the prior calendar year; provided however, that shares of our common stock subject to a repurchase requested upon the death of a stockholder will not be subject to this cap. Funds for the repurchase of shares of our common stock will come exclusively from the cumulative proceeds we receive from the sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP Offerings. In addition, our board may reject share repurchase requests in its sole discretion and the terms of the share repurchase plan provide that our board may amend, suspend, or terminate such plan at any time upon 30 days’ written notice. On March 31, 2020, our board suspended our share repurchase plan with respect to all repurchase requests other than repurchases resulting from the death or qualifying disability of stockholders, beginning with share repurchase requests submitted for repurchase during the second quarter of 2020. Furthermore, in connection with our board’s strategic alternative review process and in order to facilitate a strategic transaction, on March 18, 2021, our board approved the suspension of our share repurchase plan with respect to all repurchase requests received by us after February 28, 2021, including repurchases resulting from the death or qualifying disability of stockholders.
Therefore, in making a decision to purchase shares of our common stock, our stockholders should not assume that they will be able to sell any of their shares of our common stock back to us pursuant to our share repurchase plan and our stockholders also should understand that the repurchase price will not necessarily correlate to the value of our real estate holdings or other assets. If our board terminates our share repurchase plan, our stockholders may not be able to sell their shares of our common stock even if our stockholders deem it necessary or desirable to do so.
Our advisor may be entitled to receive significant compensation in the event of our liquidation or in connection with a termination of the Advisory Agreement, even if such termination is the result of poor performance by our advisor or as a result of termination of the Advisory Agreement by our advisor.
We are externally advised by our advisor pursuant to the Advisory Agreement between us and our advisor which has a one-year term that expires on February 16, 2022 and is subject to successive one-year renewals upon the mutual consent of us and our advisor. In the event of a partial or full liquidation of our assets, our advisor will be entitled to receive an incentive distribution equal to 15.0% of the net proceeds of the liquidation, after we have received and paid to our stockholders the sum of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock, and any shortfall in an annual 6.0% cumulative, non-compounded return to stockholders in the aggregate. In the event of a termination of the Advisory Agreement in connection with the listing of our common stock on a national securities exchange, the partnership agreement provides that our advisor will receive an incentive distribution in redemption of its limited partnership units equal to 15.0% of the amount, if any, by which (i) the market value of our outstanding common stock at listing plus distributions paid by us prior to the listing of the shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange, exceeds (ii) the sum of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock (less amounts paid to repurchase shares of our common stock) plus an annual 6.0% cumulative, non-compounded return on the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock. Upon our advisor’s receipt of the incentive distribution in redemption of its limited partnership units, our advisor will not be entitled to receive any further incentive distributions upon sales of our properties. Further, in connection with the termination or non-renewal of the Advisory Agreement other than due to a listing of the shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange, our advisor shall be entitled to receive a distribution in redemption of its limited partnership units equal to the amount that would be payable as an incentive distribution upon sales of properties, which equals 15.0% of the net proceeds if we liquidated all of our assets at fair market value, after we have received and paid to our stockholders the sum of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock and an annual 6.0% cumulative, non-compounded return to our stockholders in the aggregate. Such distribution upon termination of the Advisory Agreement is payable to our advisor even upon termination or non-renewal of the Advisory Agreement as a result of poor performance by our advisor or upon termination or non-renewal of the Advisory Agreement by our advisor. Upon our advisor’s receipt of this distribution in redemption of its limited partnership units, our advisor will not be entitled to receive any further incentive distributions upon sales of our properties. Any amounts to be paid to our advisor in connection with the termination of the Advisory Agreement cannot be determined at the present time, but such amounts, if paid, will reduce the cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
If our advisor was to terminate the Advisory Agreement, we would need to find another advisor to provide us with day-to-day management services or have employees to provide these services directly to us. There can be no assurances that we would be able to find new advisors or employees or enter into agreements for such services on acceptable terms.
Even though we have formed a special committee to investigate strategic alternatives, we may not effect a liquidity event within any targeted time frame, or at all. If we do not effect a liquidity event, our stockholders may have to hold their investment in shares of our common stock for an indefinite period of time.
On a limited basis, our stockholders may be able to sell shares of our common stock to us through our share repurchase plan, if our share repurchase plan is reinstated by our board. However, we have formed a special committee to also consider various forms of strategic alternatives, including but not limited to, the sale of our assets, a listing of our shares on a national securities exchange, or a merger with another entity, including a merger with another unlisted entity that we expect would enhance our value. We are not obligated, through our charter or otherwise, to effectuate a transaction or liquidity event and may not effectuate a transaction or liquidity event within any time frame or at all. If we do not effectuate a transaction or liquidity event, it will be very difficult for our stockholders to have liquidity for their investment in the shares of our common stock other than limited liquidity through our share repurchase plan, if our share repurchase plan is reinstated by our board.
Our results of operations, our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders and our ability to dispose of our investments are subject to national and local economic factors we cannot control or predict.
Our results of operations are subject to the risks of a national economic slowdown or downturn and other changes in national and local economic conditions. The following factors may have affected, and may continue to affect, income from our properties, our ability to acquire and dispose of properties and yields from our properties:
•poor economic times may result in defaults by tenants of our properties due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity or operational failures. We have provided an insignificant number of rent concessions, and may continue to provide rent concessions, tenant improvement expenditures or reduced rental rates to maintain or increase occupancy levels;
•fluctuations in property values as a result of increases or decreases in supply and demand, occupancies and rental rates may cause the properties that we own to decrease in value. Consequently, we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of our properties, which may require us to recognize an impairment charge or record a loss on sale in earnings;
•reduced values of our properties may limit our ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices or to obtain debt financing secured by our properties and may reduce the availability of unsecured loans;
•constricted access to credit may result in tenant defaults or non-renewals under leases;
•layoffs may lead to a lower demand for medical services and cause vacancies to increase, and a lack of future population and job growth may make it difficult to maintain or increase occupancy levels;
•future disruptions in the financial markets, deterioration in economic conditions or a public health crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, have resulted, and may continue to result, in lower occupancy in our facilities, increased vacancy rates for commercial real estate due to generally lower demand for rentable space, as well as an oversupply of rentable space;
•governmental actions and initiatives, including risks associated with the impact of a prolonged government shutdown or budgetary reductions or impasses; and
•increased insurance premiums, real estate taxes or utilities or other expenses may reduce funds available for distribution or, to the extent such increases are passed through to tenants, may lead to tenant defaults. Also, any such increased expenses may make it difficult to increase rents to tenants on turnover, which may limit our ability to increase our returns.
The length and severity of any economic slowdown or downturn cannot be predicted with confidence at this time. Our results of operations, our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders and our ability to dispose of our investments have been, and we expect that we may continue to be, negatively impacted to the extent an economic slowdown or downturn is prolonged or becomes more severe.
We face competition for the acquisition and disposition of MOBs, SNFs,OM buildings, senior housing, and other healthcare-related facilities, which may impede our ability to take, and increase the cost of, such actions, which may reduce our profitability and cause our stockholders to experience a lower return on their investment.
We face significant competition from other entities engaged in real estate investment activities for acquisitions and dispositions of MOBs, SNFs senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities, some of whom may have greater resources and lower costs of capital than we do. Increased competition makes it more challenging for us to identify and successfully capitalize on opportunities that meet our business goals and could improve the bargaining power of us and other property owners seeking to sell, thereby impeding our investment, acquisition and disposition activities. If we pay higher prices per property or receive lower prices for dispositions of our MOBs, SNFs, senior housing or other healthcare-related facilities, as amaking us more vulnerable to negative factors affecting these classes than if our investments were diversified beyond the healthcare industry.
result of such competition, ourOur business, financial condition, results of operationstenants, residents and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholdersoperators may beface litigation and experience rising liability and insurance costs, which may materially and adversely affected and our stockholders may experience a lower return on their investment.
Risks Related to Our Business
In light of the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on our business operations, we have reduced distribution payments to our stockholders and suspended our share repurchase plan, and there is no assurance as to when we will be able to increase the amount of distributions to our stockholders or reinstate our share repurchase plan, if at all.
In light of the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on our business operations and cash flows, and the uncertainty as to the ultimate severity and duration of the outbreak and its effects, on March 31, 2020, our board reduced our monthly distributions to stockholders from an annualized rate of $0.60 per share to $0.40 per share of our common stock effective with the April 2020 distribution paid in May 2020. Our board also suspended our share repurchase plan with respect to all repurchase requests other than repurchases resulting from the death or qualifying disability of stockholders, beginning with share repurchase requests submitted for repurchase during the second quarter of 2020, and later suspended our share repurchase plan with respect to all repurchase requests received by us after February 28, 2021 in connection with our board’s strategic alternative review process and in order to facilitate a strategic transaction. Our board will continue to evaluate the ongoing and future effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on our financial condition, earnings, debt covenants and other possible needs for cash, and applicable law, in considering our ability to continue to pay or increase distributions and reinstate our share purchase plan in the future. Our stockholders have no contractual or other legal right to distributions or share repurchases that have not been authorized by our board. There can be no assurance when or if distributions and share repurchases will be authorized in the future, and if authorized, whether distributions or share repurchases will be in amounts consistent with our historical levels of distributions and share repurchases. Should we fail for any reason to distribute at least 90.0% of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains, we would not qualify for the favorable tax treatment accorded to REITs.
The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely impacted, and will likely continue to adversely impact, our business and financial results, and the ultimate impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the scope and duration of the pandemic and actions taken by governmental authorities in response to the pandemic.
In December 2019, COVID-19 was identified in Wuhan, China. This virus continues to spread globally including in the United States. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and related shelter-in-place, business re-opening and quarantine restrictions, our property values, NOI and revenues may decline, and our tenants, operating partners and managers have been, and may continue to be, limited in their ability to generate income, service patients and residents and/or properly manage our properties. In addition, based on preliminary information available to management as of February 26, 2021, we have experienced an approximate 16.0% decline in resident occupancies since February 2020, as well as a significant increase in costs to care for residents, at our senior housing — RIDEA facilities. Our leased, non-RIDEA senior housing and skilled nursing facility tenants have also experienced, and may continue to experience, similar pressures related to occupancy declines and expense increases, which may impact their ability to pay rent and have an adverse effect on our operations. However, through February 2021, all rents have been collected from such leased, non-RIDEA senior housing and skilled nursing facility tenants. Given the significant uncertainty of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, we are unable to predict the impact it will have on such tenants’ continued ability to pay rent. Therefore, information provided regarding February rent collections should not serve as an indication of expected future rent collections. As such, our immediate focus continues to be on resident occupancy recovery and operating expense management. While restrictions have been at least partially lifted in many states, there remains a risk of reclosures in states where infection rates continue to rise, which may put additional pressure on our operations. Additionally, the public perception of a risk of a pandemic or media coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic and related deaths or confirmed cases, or public perception of health risks linked to perceived regional healthcare safety in our senior housing or SNFs, particularly if focused on regions in which our properties are located, may adversely affect our business operations by reducing occupancy demand at our facilities. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic has also adversely impacted, and may continue to adversely impact, the ability of our MOB tenants, many of whom have been restricted in their ability to work and to pay their rent as and when due. We have also held discussions with our tenants, operating partners and managers and they have expressed that the ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their business operations is uncertain.
Issues related to financing also are exacerbated in times of significant dislocation in the financial markets, such as those being experienced now related to the COVID-19 pandemic. It is possible our lenders will become unwilling or unable to provide us with financing, and we may not be able to replace the debt financing of such lender on favorable terms, or at all. In addition, if the regulatory capital requirements imposed on our lenders change, they may be required to significantly increase the cost of the financing that they provide to us. As a result, our lenders may revise the terms of such financings to us, which could adversely impact our liquidity and our ability to make payments on our existing obligations.
Furthermore, we and our co-sponsors and their employees that provide services to us rely on processes and activities that largely depend on people and technology, including access to information technology systems as well as information, applications, payment systems and other services provided by third parties. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, business practices have been modified with all or a portion of our co-sponsors’ employees working remotely from their homes to have our operations uninterrupted as much as possible. Additionally, technology in such employees’ homes may not be as robust as in our co-sponsors’ offices and could cause the networks, information systems, applications and other tools available to such employees to be more limited or less reliable than in our co-sponsors’ offices. The continuation of these work-from-home measures may introduce increased cybersecurity risk. These cybersecurity risks include greater phishing, malware and other cybersecurity attacks, vulnerability to disruptions of our information technology infrastructure and telecommunications systems for remote operations, increased risk of unauthorized dissemination of confidential information, greater risk of a security breach resulting in destruction or misuse of valuable information and potential impairment of our ability to perform certain functions, all of which could expose us to risks of data or financial loss, litigation and liability and could disrupt our operations and the operations of any impacted third-parties.
The information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is based on data currently available to us and will likely change as the COVID-19 pandemic continues to progress. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic continues to impact our business will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic and the actions to contain the COVID-19 pandemic or treat its impact, among others. We expect the significance of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the extent of its effect on our financial and operational results, to be dictated by, among other things, its duration, the success of efforts to contain it and the impact of actions taken in response, including the widespread availability and use of effective vaccines. For instance, government initiatives, such as the Payroll Protection Program and deferral of payroll tax payments program within the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or the CARES Act, enacted to provide substantial financial support to businesses could provide helpful mitigation for us and certain of our tenants, operating partners and managers. However, these government assistance programs are not expected to fully offset the negative financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and there can be no assurance that these programs will continue or the extent to which they will be expanded. Therefore, the ultimate impact of such relief from these programs is not yet clear. Furthermore, we expect the trends discussed above with respect to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic to continue. As such, we are continuously monitoring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, residents, tenants, operating partners, managers, portfolio of investments and on the United States and global economies. While we are not able at this time to estimate the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our financial and operational results, it could be material.
The availability and timing of cash distributions to our stockholders is uncertain. If we fail to pay distributions, their investment in shares of our common stock could suffer.
We expect to continue to pay distributions to our stockholders monthly. However, we bear all expenses incurred in our operations, which are deducted from cash flows generated by operations prior to computing the amount of cash distributions to our stockholders. In addition, our board, in its discretion, may retain any portion of such funds for working capital. We cannot assure our stockholders that sufficient cash will be available to pay monthly distributions to our stockholders or at all. Should we fail for any reason to distribute at least 90.0% of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains, we would not qualify for the favorable tax treatment accorded to REITs.
We are uncertain of all of our sources of debt or equity for funding our capital needs. If we cannot obtain funding on acceptable terms, our ability to acquire, and make necessary capital improvements to, properties may be impaired or delayed.
We have not identified all of our sources of debt or equity for funding, and such sources of funding may not be available to us on favorable terms or at all. If we do not have access to sufficient funding in the future, we may not be able to acquire, and make necessary capital improvements to, properties, pay other expenses or expand our business.
We use mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings, which may increase our business risks, could hinder our ability to pay distributions and could decrease the value of our stockholders’ investment.
We have financed, and will continue to finance, all or a portion of the purchase price of our investments in real estate and real estate-related investments by borrowing funds. We anticipate that our overall leverage will approximate 50.0% of the combined fair market value of our real estate and real estate-related investments, as determined at the end of each calendar year. Under our charter, we have a limitation on borrowing that precludes us from borrowing in excess of 300% of our net assets without the approval of a majority of our independent directors. Net assets for purposes of this calculation are defined to be our total assets (other than intangibles), valued at cost prior to deducting depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other non-cash reserves, less total liabilities. Generally speaking, the preceding calculation is expected to approximate 75.0% of the aggregate cost of our real estate and real estate-related investments before depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other similar non-cash reserves. In addition, we may incur mortgage debt and pledge some or all of our real properties as security for that debt to
obtain funds to acquire additional real properties or for working capital. Furthermore, we may borrow if we otherwise deem it necessary or advisable to ensure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
High debt levels may cause us to incur higher interest charges, which would result in higher debt service payments and could be accompanied by restrictive covenants. If there is a shortfall between the cash flows from a property and the cash flows needed to service mortgage debt on that property, then the amount available for distributions to our stockholders may be reduced. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in lenders initiating foreclosure actions. In that case, we could lose the property securing the loan that is in default, thus reducing the value of their investment. In addition, lenders may have recourse to assets other than those specifically securing the repayment of indebtedness. For tax purposes, a foreclosure on any of our properties will be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we will recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but we would not receive any cash proceeds. We may give full or partial guarantees to lenders of mortgage debt to the entities that own our properties. When we give a guaranty on behalf of an entity that owns one of our properties, we will be responsible to the lender for satisfaction of the debt if it is not paid by such entity. If any mortgage contains cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions, a default on a single property could affect multiple properties. If any of our properties are foreclosed upon due to a default, our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected.
We are dependent on tenants for our revenue, and lease terminations could reduce our distributions to our stockholders.
The successful performance of our real estate investments is materially dependent on the financial stability of our tenants. Lease payment defaults by tenants would cause us to lose the revenue associated with such leases and could cause us to reduce the amount of distributions to our stockholders. If a property is subject to a mortgage, a default by a significant tenant on its lease payments to us may result in a foreclosure on the property if we are unable to find an alternative source of revenue to meet mortgage payments. In the event of a tenant default, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-leasing our property. Further, we cannot assure our stockholders that we will be able to re-lease the property for the rent previously received, if at all, or that lease terminations will not cause us to sell the property at a loss.
The senior housing — RIDEA facilities managed by Meridian account for a significant portion of our revenues and/or operating income. Adverse developments in Meridian’s business or financial condition could have a material adverse effect on us.
As of March 26, 2021, Meridian manages the operations for a majority of our senior housing — RIDEA facilities pursuant to long-term management agreements. These senior housing — RIDEA facilities represent a substantial portion of our portfolio, based on their gross revenues. Although we have various rights as the owner of these senior housing — RIDEA facilities under our management agreements, we rely on Meridian’s personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior housing — RIDEA facilities operations efficiently and effectively, and to identify and manage development opportunities for new senior housing — RIDEA facilities. We also rely on Meridian to provide accurate facility-level financial results for our senior housing — RIDEA facilities in a timely manner and to otherwise operate our senior housing — RIDEA facilities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. We depend on Meridian’s ability to attract and retain skilled personnel to provide these services. A shortage of trained personnel or general inflationary pressures may force Meridian to enhance its pay and benefits package to compete effectively for such personnel, but it may not be able to offset these added costs by increasing the rates charged to residents. As such, any adverse developments in Meridian’s business or financial condition, including its ability to retain key personnel, could impair its ability to manage our senior housing — RIDEA facilities efficiently and effectively and could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, if Meridian experiences any significant financial, legal, accounting or regulatory difficulties due to a weak economy, industry downturn or otherwise, such difficulties could result in, among other adverse events, impairment of its continued access to capital, the enforcement of default remedies by its counterparties, or the commencement of insolvency proceedings by or against it under the United States Bankruptcy Code. Any one or a combination of these risks could have a material adverse effect on us.
We have rights to terminate our management agreements with third-party operators for our senior housing and senior housing — RIDEA facilities under any circumstances; however, we may be unable to replace such third-party operators effectively, or be able to complete any transition timely, in the event that our management agreements are terminated or not renewed.
We continually monitor and assess our contractual rights and remedies under our management agreements with third-party operators. When determining whether to pursue any existing or future rights or remedies under those agreements, including termination rights, we consider numerous factors, including legal, contractual, regulatory, business and other relevant considerations. We have exercised and in the event that we continue to exercise our rights to terminate management agreements with such third-party operators for any reason or such agreements are not renewed upon expiration of their terms, we have and would attempt to reposition the affected senior housing and/or senior housing — RIDEA facilities with another manager. Although we believe that many qualified national and regional operators would be interested in managing our senior housing and senior housing — RIDEA facilities, we cannot provide any assurance that we have been or would be able to locate another suitable manager or, if we were successful in locating such a manager, that it will or would manage the senior housing and/or senior housing — RIDEA facilities effectively or that any such transition would be completed timely. Any such transition has required and would likely continue to require substantial time, incur additional expenses and result in disruption of the operation of such facilities, including matters relating to staffing and reporting. Moreover, the transition to a replacement manager has required and may continue to require approval by the applicable regulatory authorities and, in most cases, one or more of our lenders including the mortgage lenders for the senior housing and senior housing — RIDEA facilities, and we cannot provide any assurance that such approvals have been or would be granted on a timely basis, if at all. Any inability to replace, or delay in replacing third-party operators as the managers of senior housing and senior housing — RIDEA facilities could have a material adverse effect on us.
The financial deterioration, insolvency or bankruptcy of one or more of our major tenants, operators, borrowers, managers and other obligors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
A downturn in any of our tenants’, operators’, borrowers’, managers’ or other obligors’ businesses could ultimately lead to voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy or similar insolvency proceedings, including but not limited to assignment for the benefit of creditors, liquidation or winding-up. Bankruptcy and insolvency laws afford certain rights to a defaulting tenant, operator, borrower or manager that has filed for bankruptcy or reorganization that may render certain of our remedies unenforceable or, at the least, delay our ability to pursue such remedies and realize any related recoveries. A debtor has the right to assume, or to assume and assign to a third party, or to reject its executory contracts and unexpired leases in a bankruptcy proceeding. If a debtor were to reject its leases with us, obligations under such rejected leases would cease. The claim against the rejecting debtor would be an unsecured claim, which would be limited by the statutory cap set forth in the United States Bankruptcy Code. This statutory cap may be substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed under the lease. In addition, a debtor may also assert in bankruptcy proceedings that leases should be re-characterized as financing agreements, which could result in our being deemed a lender instead of a landlord. A lender’s rights and remedies, as compared to a landlord’s, generally are materially less favorable, and our rights as a lender may be subordinated to other creditors’ rights.
Furthermore, the automatic stay provisions of the United States Bankruptcy Code would preclude us from enforcing our remedies unless we first obtain relief from the court having jurisdiction over the bankruptcy case. This would effectively limit or delay our ability to collect unpaid rent or interest payments, and we may ultimately not receive any payment at all. In addition, we would likely be required to fund certain expenses and obligations to preserve the value of our properties, avoid the imposition of liens on our properties or transition our properties to a new tenant, operator or manager. Additionally, we lease many of our properties to healthcare providers who provide long-term custodial care to the elderly. Evicting operators or managers for failure to pay rent while the property is occupied typically involves specific procedural or regulatory requirements and may not be successful. Even if eviction is possible, we may determine not to do so due to reputational or other risks. Bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings typically also result in increased costs to the operator or manager, significant management distraction and performance declines. If we are unable to transition affected properties, they would likely experience prolonged operational disruption, leading to lower occupancy rates and further depressed revenues. Publicity about the operator’s or manager’s financial condition and bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings may also negatively impact their and our reputations, decreasing customer demand and revenues. Any or all of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, results of operations and cash flows.
If we internalize our management functions, we could incur significant costs associated with being self-managed.
Our strategy may involve internalizing our management functions. If we internalize our management functions, we would no longer bear the costs of the various fees and expenses we pay to our advisor under the Advisory Agreement; however, our direct expenses would include general and administrative costs, including legal, accounting, and other expenses related to corporate governance, SEC reporting and compliance. We would also incur the compensation and benefits costs of our officers and other employees and consultants that are now paid by our advisor or its affiliates. In addition, we may issue equity awards
to officers, employees and consultants, which awards would decrease net income and funds from operations, or FFO, and may further dilute our stockholders’ investment. We cannot reasonably estimate the amount of fees to our advisor we would save and the costs we would incur if we became self-managed. If the expenses we assume as a result of an internalization are higher than the expenses we no longer pay to our advisor, our net income per share and FFO per share may be lower as a result of the internalization than they otherwise would have been, potentially decreasing the amount of funds available to distribute to our stockholders.
As currently organized, we do not directly have any employees. If we elect to internalize our operations, we would employ personnel and would be subject to potential liabilities commonly faced by employers, such as worker’s disability and compensation claims, potential labor disputes and other employee-related liabilities and grievances. Upon any internalization of our advisor, certain key personnel of our advisor or American Healthcare Investors may not be employed by us, but instead may remain employees of our co-sponsors or their affiliates.
If we internalize our management functions, we could have difficulty integrating these functions as a stand-alone entity. Currently, our advisor and its affiliates perform asset management and general and administrative functions, including accounting and financial reporting, for multiple entities. They have a great deal of know-how and can experience economies of scale. We may fail to properly identify the appropriate mix of personnel and capital needs to operate as a stand-alone entity. An inability to manage an internalization transaction effectively could, therefore, result in our incurring additional costs and/or experiencing deficiencies in our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting. Such deficiencies could cause us to incur additional costs, and our management’s attention could be diverted from most effectively managing our properties.
We may incur additional costs in re-leasing properties, which could adversely affect the cash available for future distribution to our stockholders.
Some of the properties we have acquired and will seek to acquire are healthcare properties designed or built primarily for a particular tenant of a specific type of use known as a single-user facility. If we or our tenants terminate the leases for these properties or our tenants default on their lease obligations or lose their regulatory authority to operate such properties, we may not be able to locate suitable replacement tenants to lease the properties for their specialized uses. Alternatively, we may be required to spend substantial amounts to adapt the properties to other uses or incur other significant re-leasing costs. Any loss of revenues or additional capital expenditures required as a result may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay future distributions to our stockholders.
A breach of information technology systems on which we rely could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and reputation.
We and our operators rely on information technology systems, including the Internet and networks and systems maintained and controlled by third-party vendors and other third parties, to process, transmit and store information and to manage or support our business processes. Third-party vendors collect and hold personally identifiable information and other confidential information of our tenants, patients, stockholders and employees. We also maintain confidential financial and business information regarding us and persons and entities with which we do business on our information technology systems. While we and our operators take steps to protect the security of the information maintained in our information technology systems, including the use of commercially available systems, software, tools and monitoring to provide security for processing, transmitting and storing of the information, it is possible that such security measures will not be able to prevent human error or the systems’ improper functioning, or the loss, misappropriation, disclosure or corruption of personally identifiable information or other confidential or sensitive information, including information about our tenants and employees. Cybersecurity breaches, including physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses, phishing scams, attacks by hackers, breaches due to employee error or misconduct, and similar breaches, can create, and in some instances in the past resulted in, system disruptions, shutdowns or unauthorized access to information maintained on our information technology systems or the information technology systems of our third-party vendors or other third parties or otherwise cause disruption or negative impacts to occur to our business and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. While we and most of our operators maintain cyber risk insurance to provide some coverage for certain risks arising out of cybersecurity breaches, there is no assurance that such insurance would cover all or a significant portion of the costs or consequences associated with a cybersecurity breach. As our reliance on technology increases, so will the risks posed to our information systems, both internal and those we outsource. In addition, as the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to information technology systems become more varied and sophisticated and the occurrence of such breaches becomes more frequent, we and our third-party vendors and other third parties may be unable to adequately anticipate these techniques or breaches and implement appropriate preventative measures. There is no guarantee that any processes, procedures and internal controls we have implemented or will implement will prevent cyber intrusions. Any failure to prevent cybersecurity breaches and maintain the proper function, security and availability of our or our third-party vendors’ and other third parties’ information technology systems could interrupt our operations, damage our reputation and brand, damage our competitive position, make it difficult for us to attract
and retain tenants, and subject us to liability claims or regulatory penalties, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest
We are subject to conflicts of interest arising out of relationships among us, our officers, our co-sponsors, our advisor and its affiliates, including the material conflicts discussed below.
Our advisor faces conflicts of interest relating to its compensation structure, including the payment of acquisition fees and asset management fees, which could result in actions that are not necessarily in our stockholders’ long-term best interest.
Under the Advisory Agreement and pursuant to the subordinated participation interest our advisor holds in our operating partnership, our advisor will be entitled to fees and distributions that are structured in a manner intended to provide incentives to our advisor to perform in both our and our stockholders’ long-term best interests. The fees to which our advisor or its affiliates will be entitled include acquisition fees, asset management fees, property management fees, disposition fees and other fees as provided for under the Advisory Agreement and agreement of limited partnership of our operating partnership. The distributions our advisor may become entitled to receive would be payable upon distribution of net sales proceeds to our stockholders, the listing of the shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange, certain merger transactions or the termination of the Advisory Agreement. However, because our advisor will be entitled to receive substantial minimum compensation regardless of our performance, our advisor’s interests may not be wholly aligned with theirs. In that regard, our advisor or its affiliates will receive an asset management fee with respect to the ongoing operation and management of properties based on the amount of our initial investment and capital expenditures and not the performance of those investments, which could result in our advisor not having adequate incentive to manage our portfolio to provide profitable operations during the period we hold our investments. On the other hand, our advisor could be motivated to recommend riskier or more speculative investments in order to increase the fees payable to our advisor or for us to generate the specified levels of performance or net sales proceeds that would entitle our advisor to fees or distributions. Furthermore, our advisor or its affiliates will receive an acquisition fee that is based on the contract purchase price of each property acquired or the origination or acquisition price of any real estate-related investment, rather than the performance of those investments. Therefore, our advisor or its affiliates may have an incentive to recommend investments more quickly or with a higher purchase price or investments that may not produce the maximum risk adjusted returns in order to receive such acquisition fees.
Our advisor may receive economic benefits from its status as a limited partner without bearing any of the investment risk.
Our advisor is a limited partner in our operating partnership. Our advisor is entitled to receive an incentive distribution equal to 15.0% of net sales proceeds of properties after we have received and paid to our stockholders a return of their invested capital and an annual 6.0% cumulative, non-compounded return on the gross proceeds of the sale of shares of our common stock. We bear all of the risk associated with the properties but, as a result of the incentive distributions to our advisor, we are not entitled to all of our operating partnership’s proceeds from property dispositions.
The distribution payable to our advisor may influence our decisions about listing the shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange, merging our company with another company and acquisition or disposition of our investments.
Our advisor’s entitlement to fees upon the sale of our assets and to participate in net sales proceeds could result in our advisor recommending sales of our investments at the earliest possible time at which sales of investments would produce the level of return which would entitle our advisor to compensation relating to such sales, even if continued ownership of those investments might be in our stockholders’ long-term best interest. The subordinated participation interest may require our operating partnership to make a distribution to our advisor in redemption of its limited partnership units upon the listing of the shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange or the merger of our company with another company in which our stockholders receive shares that are traded on a national securities exchange if our advisor meets the performance thresholds included in our operating partnership’s limited partnership agreement, even if our advisor is no longer serving as our advisor. To avoid making this distribution, our independent directors may decide against listing the shares of our common stock or merging with another company even if, but for the requirement to make this distribution, such listing or merger would be in our stockholders’ best interest. In addition, the requirement to pay these fees could cause our independent directors to make different investment or disposition decisions than they would otherwise make, in order to satisfy our obligation to our advisor.
We may acquire assets from, or dispose of assets to, affiliates of our advisor, which could result in us entering into transactions on less favorable terms than we would receive from a third party or that negatively affect the public’s perception of us.
We may acquire assets from affiliates of our advisor. Further, we may also dispose of assets to affiliates of our advisor. Affiliates of our advisor may make substantial profits in connection with such transactions and may owe fiduciary and/or other
duties to the selling or purchasing entity in these transactions, and conflicts of interest between us and the selling or purchasing entities could exist in such transactions. Because our independent directors would rely on our advisor in identifying and evaluating any such transaction, these conflicts could result in transactions based on terms that are less favorable to us than we would receive from a third party. Also, the existence of conflicts, regardless of how they are resolved, might negatively affect the public’s perception of us.
We have entered into a joint venture with another program and may continue to enter into joint venture programs sponsored or advised by one of our co-sponsors or one of their affiliates and may face conflicts of interest or disagreements with our joint venture partners that may not be resolved as quickly or on terms as advantageous to us as would be the case if the joint venture had been negotiated at arm’s-length with an independent joint venture partner.
We have entered into a joint venture with another program and may continue to enter into joint venture programssponsored or advised by one of our co-sponsors or one of their affiliates and may face certain additional risks and potential conflicts of interest. For example, securities issued by the other American Healthcare Investors program may never have an active trading market. Therefore, if we were to become listed on a national securities exchange, we may no longer have similar goals and objectives with respect to the resale of properties in the future. Joint ventures between us and other American Healthcare Investors programs or future American Healthcare Investors programs will not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiation of the type normally conducted between unrelated co-venturers. Under these joint venture agreements, none of the co-venturers may have the power to control the venture, and an impasse could occur regarding matters pertaining to the joint venture, including determining when and whether to buy or sell a particular property and the timing of a liquidation, which might have a negative impact on the joint venture and decrease returns to our stockholders.
Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure
Several potential events could cause our stockholders’ investment in us to be diluted, which may reduce the overall value of their investment.
Our stockholders’ investment in us could be diluted by a number of factors, including:
•future offerings of our securities, including issuances pursuant to the DRIP and up to 200,000,000 shares of any class or series of preferred stock that our board may authorize;
•private issuances of our securities to other investors, including institutional investors;
•issuances of our securities pursuant to our incentive plan; or
•redemptions of units of limited partnership interest in our operating partnership in exchange for shares of our common stock.
To the extent we issue additional equity interests, current stockholders’ percentage ownership interest in us will be diluted. In addition, depending upon the terms and pricing of any additional offerings and the value of our real estate and real estate-related investments, our stockholders may also experience dilution in the book value and fair market value of their shares of our common stock.
Our ability to issue preferred stock may include a preference in distributions superior to our common stock and also may deter or prevent a sale of shares of our common stock in which our stockholders could profit.
Our charter authorizes our board to issue up to 200,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Our board has the discretion to establish the preferences and rights, including a preference in distributions superior to our common stockholders, of any issued preferred stock. If we authorize and issue preferred stock with a distribution preference over our common stock, payment of any distribution preferences of outstanding preferred stock would reduce the amount of funds available for the payment of distributions on our common stock. Further, holders of preferred stock are normally entitled to receive a preference payment in the event we liquidate, dissolve or wind up before any payment is made to our common stockholders, likely reducing the amount our common stockholders would otherwise receive upon such an occurrence. In addition, under certain circumstances, the issuance of preferred stock or a separate class or series of common stock may render more difficult or tend to discourage:
•a merger, tender offer or proxy contest;
•assumption of control by a holder of a large block of our securities; or
•removal of incumbent management.
The limit on the percentage of shares of our common stock that any person may own may discourage a takeover or business combination that may have benefited our stockholders.
Our charter restricts the direct or indirect ownership by one person or entity to no more than 9.9% of the value of shares of our then outstanding capital stock (which includes common stock and any preferred stock we may issue) and no more than 9.9% of the value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our then outstanding common stock. This restriction may discourage a change of control of us and may deter individuals or entities from making tender offers for shares of our stock on terms that might be financially attractive to our stockholders or which may cause a change in our management. This ownership restriction may also prohibit business combinations that would have otherwise been approved by our board and our stockholders. In addition to deterring potential transactions that may be favorable to our stockholders, these provisions may also decrease their ability to sell their shares of our common stock.
Our stockholders’ ability to control our operations is severely limited.
Our board determines our major strategies, including our strategies regarding investments, financing, growth, debt capitalization, REIT qualification and distributions. Our board may amend or revise these and other strategies without a vote of the stockholders. Our charter sets forth the stockholder voting rights required to be set forth therein under the North American Securities Administrators Association. Under our charter and Maryland law, our stockholders have a right to vote only on the following matters:
•the election or removal of directors;
•the amendment of our charter, except that our board may amend our charter without stockholder approval to change our name or the name of other designation or the par value of any class or series of our stock and the aggregate par value of our stock, increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have the authority to issue, or effect certain reverse stock splits;
•our dissolution; and
•certain mergers, consolidations, conversions, statutory share exchanges and sales or other dispositions of all or substantially all of our assets.
All other matters are subject to the discretion of our board.
Maryland law prohibits certain business combinations, which may make it more difficult for us to be acquired and may limit or delay our stockholders’ ability to dispose of their shares of our common stock.
Certain provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, or the MGCL, such as the business combination statute and the control share acquisition statute, are designed to prevent, or have the effect of preventing, someone from acquiring control of us. The MGCL prohibits “business combinations” between a Maryland corporation and:
•any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 10.0% or more of the voting power of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock, which is referred to as an “interested stockholder”;
•an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was an interested stockholder; or
•an affiliate of an interested stockholder.
These prohibitions last for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder. Thereafter, any business combination with the interested stockholder or an affiliate of the interested stockholder must be recommended by the corporation’s board and approved by the affirmative vote of at least 80.0% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding shares of voting stock of the corporation, and two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting stock of the corporation other than shares of voting stock held by the interested stockholder. These requirements could have the effect of inhibiting a change in control even if a change in control were in our stockholders’ best interests.
Pursuant to the MGCL, our bylaws exempt us from the control share acquisition statute, which eliminates voting rights for certain levels of shares that could exercise control over us, and our board has adopted a resolution providing that any business combination between us and any other person is exempted from the business combination statute, provided that such business combination is first approved by our board. However, if the bylaws provisions exempting us from the control share acquisition statute or our board resolution opting out of the business combination statute were repealed in whole or in part at any time, these provisions of the MGCL could delay or prevent offers to acquire us and increase the difficulty of consummating any such offers, even if such a transaction would be in our stockholders’ best interest.
The MGCL and our organizational documents limit our stockholders’ right to bring claims against our officers and directors.
The MGCL provides that a director will not have any liability as a director so long as he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in our best interest, and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. In addition, our charter provides that, subject to the applicable limitations set forth therein or under the MGCL, no director or officer will be liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages. Our charter also provides that we will generally indemnify our directors, our officers, our advisor and its affiliates for losses they may incur by reason of their service in those capacities unless: (i) their act or omission was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and was committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty; (ii) they actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services; or (iii) in the case of any criminal proceeding, they had reasonable cause to believe the act or omission was unlawful. Moreover, we have entered into separate indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers and intend to enter into indemnification agreements with each of our future directors and executive officers. As a result, we and our stockholders may have more limited rights against these persons than might otherwise exist under common law. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by these persons in some cases. However, our charter also provides that we may not indemnify our directors, our advisor and its affiliates for any loss or liability suffered by them or hold them harmless for any loss or liability suffered by us unless they have determined that the course of conduct that caused the loss or liability was in our best interest, they were acting on our behalf or performing services for us, the liability was not the result of negligence or misconduct by our non-independent directors, our advisor and its affiliates or gross negligence or willful misconduct by our independent directors, and the indemnification is recoverable only out of our net assets or the proceeds of insurance and not from our stockholders.
Our stockholders’ investment return may be reduced if we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. If we become subject to registration under the Investment Company Act, we may not be able to continue our business.
We do not intend to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. We monitor our operations and our assets on an ongoing basis in order to ensure that neither we, nor any of our subsidiaries, meet the definition of “investment company” under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act. If we were obligated to register as an investment company, we would have to comply with a variety of substantive requirements under the Investment Company Act imposing, among other things: limitations on capital structure; restrictions on specified investments; prohibitions on transactions with affiliates; compliance with reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy disclosure and other rules and regulations that would significantly change our operations; and potentially, compliance with daily valuation requirements.
To maintain compliance with our Investment Company Act exemption, we may be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain. Similarly, we may have to acquire additional income- or loss-generating assets that we might not otherwise have acquired or may have to forgo opportunities to acquire interests in companies that we would otherwise want to acquire and would be important to our investment strategy. Accordingly, our board may not be able to change our investment policies as our board may deem appropriate if such change would cause us to meet the definition of an “investment company.” In addition, a change in the value of any of our assets could negatively affect our ability to avoid being required to register as an investment company. If we were required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, but failed to do so, we would be prohibited from engaging in our business, and criminal and civil actions could be brought against us. In addition, our contracts would be unenforceable unless a court were to require enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of us and liquidate our business, which would reduce our stockholders’ investment return.
We are an “emerging growth company” under the federal securities laws and will be subject to reduced public company reporting requirements.
In April 2012, President Obama signed into law the JOBS Act. We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions from, or reduced disclosure obligations relating to, various reporting requirements that are normally applicable to public companies.
We could remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five fiscal years after our initial public offering, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenue of $1.07 billion or more, (ii) December 31 of the fiscal year that we become a “large accelerated filer,” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (which would occur if the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million, measured as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, and we have been publicly reporting for at least 12 months), or (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three-year period.
Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies are not required to (i) provide an auditor’s attestation report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (ii) comply with new requirements adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, which may require a supplement to the auditor’s report in which the auditor must provide additional information about the audit and the issuer’s financial statements, (iii) comply with new audit rules adopted by the PCAOB after April 5, 2012 (unless the SEC determines otherwise), (iv) provide certain disclosures relating to executive compensation generally required for larger public companies, or (v) hold stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation. Other than as set forth in the following paragraph, we have not yet made a decision as to whether to take advantage of any or all of the JOBS Act exemptions that are applicable to us. If we do take advantage of any of the remaining exemptions, we do not know if some investors will find our common stock less attractive as a result.
Additionally, the JOBS Act provides that an “emerging growth company” may take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies. This means that an “emerging growth company” can delay adopting certain accounting standards until such standards are otherwise applicable to private companies. However, we elected to “opt out” of such extended transition period, and will therefore comply with new or revisedaccounting standards on the applicable dates on which the adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that our decision to opt out of such extendedtransition period for compliance with new or revised accounting standards is irrevocable.
Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate
•Uncertain market conditions relating to the future acquisition or disposition of properties could lead such acquiredour real estate investments to decrease in value or may cause us to sell our properties at a loss in the future.
Our advisor,•Most of our costs, such as operating and general and administrative expenses, interest expense and real estate acquisition and construction costs, are subject to the oversightinflation and approval of our board, may exercise its discretion as to whether and when to sell a property, and we will have no obligation to sell properties at any particular time. We cannot predict with any certainty the various market conditions affecting real estate investments that will exist at any particular time in the future. As such, we may be purchasing our properties at a time when capitalization rates are at historically low levels and purchase prices are high. In addition, we may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold. We may not have adequate funds available to correct such defects or to make such improvements. Moreover, in acquiring a property, we may agree to restrictions that prohibit the sale of that property for a period of time or impose other restrictions, such as a limitation on the amount of debt that can be placed or repaid on that property. We cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property. Therefore, the value of our properties may not increase over time, which may restrict our ability to sell our properties, or in the event we are able to sell such properties, may lead to sale prices less than the prices that we paid to purchase the properties. Additionally, we may incur prepayment penalties in the event we sell a property subject to a mortgage earlier than we otherwise had planned. Accordingly, the extent to which our stockholders will receive cash distributions and realize potential appreciation on our real estate investments will, among other things, be dependent upon fluctuating market conditions.
A significant portion of our annual base rent may be concentrated in a small number of tenants. Therefore, non-renewals, terminations or lease defaults by any of these significant tenants could reduce our net income and have a negative effect on our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
As of March 16, 2021, rental payments by our tenant, RC Tier Properties, LLC, accounted for approximately 10.9% of our total property portfolio’s annualized base rent or annualized NOI. The success of our investments materially depends upon the financial stability of the tenants leasing the properties we own. Therefore, a non-renewal after the expiration of a lease term, termination, default or other failure to meet rental obligations by significant tenants, such as RC Tier Properties, LLC, would significantly lower our net income. These events could cause us to reduce the amount of distributions to our stockholders.
Uninsured losses relating to real estate and lender requirements to obtain insurance may reduce our stockholders’ returns.
There are types of losses relating to real estate, generally catastrophic in nature, such as losses due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution, climate change or environmental matters, for which we do not intend to obtain insurance unless we are required to do so by mortgage lenders. If any of our properties incurs a casualty loss that is not fully covered by insurance, the value of our assets will be reduced by any such uninsured loss. In addition, other than any reserves we may establish, we have no source of funding to repair or reconstruct any uninsured damaged property, and we cannot assure our stockholders that any such sources of funding will be available to us for such purposes in the future. Also, to the extent we must pay unexpectedly large amounts for uninsured losses, we could suffer reduced earnings that would result in less cash to be distributed to our stockholders. In cases where we are required by mortgage lenders to obtain casualty loss insurance for catastrophic events, effects of climate change or terrorism, such insurance may not be available, or may not be available at a reasonable cost, which could inhibit our ability to finance or refinance our properties. Additionally, if we obtainrecoverable.
such insurance, the costs associated with owning a property would increase and could have a material adverse effect on the net income from the property, and, thus, the cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
AOur high concentration of our properties in a particular geographic area would magnify the effects of downturns in that geographic area.
We have a concentrationconcentrations of properties in particular geographic areas; therefore, any adverse situation that disproportionatelyareas magnify the effects one of negative conditions affecting those areas would have a magnified adverse effect on our portfolio. As of March 16, 2021, our properties located in Missouri and Michigan accounted for approximately 11.9% and 10.1%, respectively, of our total property portfolio’s annualized base rent or annualized NOI. Accordingly, there is a geographic concentration of risk subject to fluctuations in each state’s economy.areas.
Terrorist attacks, acts of violence or war, political protests and unrest or public health crises may affect the markets in which we operate and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Terrorist attacks, acts of violence or war, political protests and unrest or public health crises (including the COVID-19 pandemic) have negatively affected, and may continue to negatively affect, our operations and our stockholders’ investments. We have acquired and may continue to acquire•Our real estate assets locatedinvestments may be concentrated in areas that are susceptibleOM buildings, senior housing, SNFs or other healthcare-related facilities, making us more vulnerable to terrorist attacks, acts of violence or war, political protests or public health crises. These events may directly impactnegative factors affecting these classes than if our investments were diversified beyond the value of our assets through damage, destruction, loss or increased security costs. Although we may obtain terrorism insurance, we may not be able to obtain sufficient coverage to fund any losses we may incur. Risks associated with potential acts of terrorism could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. Further, certain losses resulting from these types of events are uninsurable or not insurable at reasonable costs. More generally, any terrorist attack, other act of violence or war, political protest and unrest or public health crisis could result in increased volatility in, or damage to, the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy, all of which could adversely affect our tenants’ ability to pay rent on their leases or our ability to borrow money or issue capital stock at acceptable prices, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.healthcare industry.
•Our business, tenants, residents and operators may face litigation and experience rising liability and insurance costs, which may materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or cash flows.us.
Risks Related to Real Estate-Related Investments
•Unfavorable real estate market conditions and delays in liquidating defaulted mortgage loan investments may negatively impact mortgage loans in which we have invested and may invest, which could result in losses to us.
•We currently intend to pursue insurance recovery for any losses caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, but there can be no assurance that coverage will be available under our existing policies or if such coverage is available, which and how muchexpect a portion of our losses will be covered and what other limitations may apply. Due to the likely increase in claims as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, insurance companies may limit or stop offering coverage to companies like ours for pandemic related claims and/or significantly increase the cost of insurance so that it is no longer available at commercially reasonable rates.
With respect to our senior housing — RIDEA facilities, we are ultimately responsible for operational risks and other liabilities of the facility, other than those arising out of certain actions by our operator, such as gross negligence or willful misconduct. As such, operational risks include, and our resulting revenues therefore depend on, the availability and cost of general and professional liability insurance coverage or increases in insurance policy deductibles. Furthermore, because we bear such operational risks and liabilities related to our senior housing — RIDEA facilities, we may be directly adversely impacted by potential litigation related to the COVID-19 pandemic that have occurred or may occur at those facilities, and our insurance coverage may not cover or may not be sufficient to cover any potential losses.
Additionally, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the cost of insurance for our tenants, operators and residents is expected to increase as well, and such insurance may not cover certain claims related to COVID-19, which could impair their ability to pay rent to us. Our exposure to COVID-19-related litigation risk may be further increased if our operators or residents of such facilities are subject to bankruptcy or insolvency. Combined with the factors above, these trends in insurance coverage may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or cash flows.
Delays in the acquisition, development and construction of real properties may have adverse effects on our results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Delays we encounter in the selection, acquisition and development of real properties could adversely affect our stockholders’ returns. Where properties are acquired prior to the start of construction or during the early stages of construction, it will typically take several months to complete construction and rent available space. If we engage in development or construction projects, we will be subject to uncertainties associated with re-zoning for development, environmental concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups, and our builder’s ability to build in conformity with plans, specifications, budgeted costs and timetables. If a builder fails to perform, we may resort to legal action to rescind the purchase or the construction contract or to compel performance. A builder’s performance may also be affected or delayed by conditions beyond the builder’s control. Therefore, our stockholders could suffer delays in the receipt of cash distributions attributable to those
particular real properties. Delays in completion of construction could give tenants the right to terminate preconstruction leases for space at a newly developed project. We may incur additional risks if we make periodic progress payments or other advances to builders prior to completion of construction. These and other such factors can result in increased costs of a project or loss of our investment. In addition, we will be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly constructed projects. We also must rely on rental income and expense projections and estimates of the fair market value of property upon completion of construction when agreeing upon a price at the time we acquire the property. If our projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property, and our return on our investment could suffer.
Our stockholders may not receive any profits resulting from the sale of our properties, or receive such profits in a timely manner, because we may provide financing to the purchaser of such property.
When we decide to sell one of our properties, we may provide financing to the purchasers. When we provide financing to purchasers, we will bear the risk that the purchaser may default on its obligations under the financing, which could negatively impact cash flows from operations. Even in the absence of a purchaser default, the distribution of sale proceeds, or their reinvestment in other assets, will be delayed until the promissory notes or other property we may accept upon the sale are actually paid, sold, refinanced or otherwise disposed of. In some cases, we may receive initial down payments in cash and other property in the year of sale in an amount less than the selling price, and subsequent payments will be spread over a number of years. Therefore, our stockholders may experience a delay in the distribution to our stockholders of the proceeds of a sale until such time. Additionally, if any purchaser defaults under a financing arrangement with us, it could negatively impact our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders.
We face possible liability for environmental cleanup costs and damages for contamination related to properties we acquire, which could substantially increase our costs and reduce our liquidity and cash distributions to our stockholders.
Because we own and operate real estate, we are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations. Under these laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real estate may be liable for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in such property. The costs of removal or remediation could be substantial. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures. Environmental laws provide for sanctions in the event of noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private parties. Certain environmental laws and common law principles could be used to impose liability for release of and exposure to hazardous substances, including the release of asbestos-containing materials into the air, and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real estate for personal injury or property damage associated with exposure to released hazardous substances. In addition, new or more stringent laws or stricter interpretations of existing laws could change the cost of compliance or liabilities and restrictions arising out of such laws. The cost of defending against these claims, complying with environmental regulatory requirements, conducting remediation of any contaminated property, or of paying personal injury claims could be substantial, which would reduce our liquidity and cash available for distribution to our stockholders. In addition, the presence of hazardous substances on a property or the failure to meet environmental regulatory requirements may materially impair our ability to use, lease or sell a property, or to use the property as collateral for borrowing.
Our real estateestate-related investments may be concentrated in MOBs, SNFs, senior housing or other healthcare-related facilities, making us potentially more vulnerable economically than if our investments were diversified.
As a REIT, we invest primarily in real estate. Within the real estate industry, we have acquired and intend to continue to acquire or selectively develop and own MOBs, SNFs, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities. We are subject to risks inherent in concentrating investments in real estate. These risks resulting from a lack of diversification become even greater as a result of our business strategy to invest to a substantial degree in healthcare-related facilities.
A downturn in the commercial real estate industry generally could significantly adversely affect the value of our properties. A downturn in the healthcare industry could negatively affect our lessees’ ability to make lease payments to us and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders. These adverse effects could be more pronounced than if we diversified our investments outside of real estate or if our portfolio did not include a substantial concentration in MOBs, SNFs, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities.
Certain of our properties may not have efficient alternative uses, so the loss of a tenant may cause us not to be able to find a replacement or cause us to spend considerable capital to adapt the property to an alternative use.
Some of the properties we have acquiredilliquid, and will seek to acquire are healthcare properties that may only be suitable for similar healthcare-related tenants. If we or our tenants terminate the leases for these properties or our tenants lose their regulatory authority to operate such properties, we may not be able to locate suitable replacement tenantsadjust our portfolio in a timely manner in response to lease the properties
for their specialized uses. Alternatively, we may be required to spend substantial amounts to adapt the properties to other uses. Any loss of revenues or additional capital expenditures required as a result may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Our current and future properties and our tenants may be unable to compete successfully, which could resultchanges in lower rent payments, reduce our cash flows from operations and amount available for distributions.
Our current and future properties often will face competition from nearby properties that provide comparable services. Some of those competing properties are owned by governmental agencies and supported by tax revenues, and others are owned by nonprofit corporations and may be supported to a large extent by endowments and charitable contributions. These types of support are not available to our properties.
Similarly, our tenants face competition from other medical practices in nearby hospitalseconomic and other medical facilities. Our tenants’ failure to compete successfully with these other practices could adversely affect their ability to make rental payments, which could adversely affect our rental revenues. Further, from time to time and for reasons beyond our control, referral sources, including physicians and managed care organizations, may change their lists of hospitals or physicians to which they refer patients or that are permitted to participate in the payor program. This could adversely affect our tenants’ ability to make rental payments, which could adversely affect our rental revenues.conditions.
Any reduction in rental revenues resulting from the inability of our properties and our tenants to compete successfully may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Representations and warranties made by us in connection with sales of our properties may subject us to liability that could result in losses and could harm our operating results and, therefore distributions we make to our stockholders.
When we sell a property, we may be required to make representations and warranties regarding the property and other customary items. In the event of a breach of such representations or warranties, the purchaser of the property may have claims for damages against us, rights to indemnification from us or otherwise have remedies against us. In any such case, we may incur liabilities that could result in losses and could harm our operating results and, therefore distributions we make to our stockholders.
Acquiring or attempting to acquire multiple properties in a single transaction may adversely affect our operations.
From time to time, we have acquired, and may continue to attempt to acquire, multiple properties in a single transaction. Portfolio acquisitions are more complex and expensive than single property acquisitions, and the risk that a multiple-property acquisition does not close may be greater than in a single-property acquisition. Portfolio acquisitions may also result in us owning investments in geographically dispersed markets, placing additional demands on our ability to manage the properties in the portfolio. In addition, a seller may require that a group of properties be purchased as a package even though we may not want to purchase one or more properties in the portfolio. In these situations, if we are unable to identify another person or entity to acquire the unwanted properties, we may be required to operate or attempt to dispose of these properties. To acquire multiple properties in a single transaction, we may be required to accumulate a large amount of cash. We would expect the returns that we earn on such cash to be less than the ultimate returns on real property; therefore, accumulating such cash could reduce our funds available for distributions to our stockholders. Any of the foregoing events may have an adverse effect on our operations.
Risks Related to the Healthcare Industry
•The healthcare industry is heavily regulated, and new laws or regulations, changes to existing laws or regulations, loss of licensure or failure to obtain licensure could result in the inability of our tenants to make rent payments to us.
The healthcare industry is heavily regulated by federal, state and local governmental bodies. The tenants in our healthcare properties generally will be subject to laws and regulations covering, among other things, licensure, certification for participation in government programs, and relationships with physicians and other referral sources. Changes in these laws and regulationsus or our tenants’ failure to comply with these laws and regulations could negatively affect the ability of our tenants to make lease payments to us and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Many of our healthcare properties and their tenants may require a CON to operate. Failure to obtain a license or CON, or loss of a required license or CON, would prevent a facility from operating in the manner intended by the tenant. These events could materially adversely affect our tenants’operators’ ability to make rent payments to us. State and local laws also may regulate expansion, including the addition of new beds or services or acquisition of medical equipment, and the construction of healthcare-relatedoperate facilities by requiring a CON or other similar approval. State CON laws and other similar laws are not uniform throughout the United States and are subject to change; therefore, this may adversely impact our tenants’ ability toheld in RIDEA structures.
provide services in different states. We cannot predict the impact of state CON laws or similar laws on our development of facilities or the operations of our tenants.
In addition, state CON laws often materially impact the ability of competitors to enter into the marketplace of our facilities. The repeal of CON laws could allow competitors to freely operate in previously closed markets. This could negatively affect our tenants’ abilities to make rent payments to us.
In limited circumstances, loss of state licensure or certification or closure of a facility could ultimately result in loss of authority to operate the facility or provide services at the facility and require new CON authorization licensure and/or authorization or potential authorization from the CMS to re-institute operations. As a result, a portion of the value of the facility may be reduced, which would adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Reductions in reimbursement•Reimbursement rates from third-party payors, including Medicare and Medicaid, that do not rise as quickly, or at all, compared to the rate of inflation, could adversely affect the profitability of our tenantstenants’ operations and hinder their ability to make rental payments to us and comprehensive healthcare reform legislation could materially adversely affector our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.profitability from operating facilities held in RIDEA structures.
Sources of revenue for our tenants may include the federal Medicare program, state Medicaid programs, private insurance carriers and health maintenance organizations, among others. Efforts by such payors to reduce healthcare costs will likely continue, which may result in reductions or slower growth in reimbursement for certain services provided by some of our tenants. In addition, the healthcare billing rules and regulations are complex, and the failure of any of our tenants to comply with various laws and regulations could jeopardize their ability to continue participating in Medicare, Medicaid and other government sponsored payment programs. Moreover, the state and federal governmental healthcare programs are subject to reductions by state and federal legislative actions, and changes in reimbursement models may impact our tenants’ payments and create uncertainty in the tenants’ financial condition.
The healthcare industry continues to face various challenges, including increased government and private payor pressure on healthcare providers to control or reduce costs. It is possible that our tenants will continue to experience a shift in payor mix away from fee-for-service payors, resulting in an increase in the percentage of revenues attributable to reimbursement based upon value-based principles and quality driven managed care programs, and general industry trends that include pressures to control healthcare costs. Pressures to control healthcare costs and a shift away from traditional health insurance reimbursement based upon a fee for service payment to payment based upon quality outcomes have increased the uncertainty of payments.
In addition, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, or the Healthcare Reform Act, is intended to reduce the number of individuals in the United States without health insurance and effect significant other changes to the ways in which healthcare is organized, delivered and reimbursed. Included within the legislation is a limitation on physician-owned hospitals from expanding, unless the facility satisfies very narrow federal exceptions to this limitation. Therefore, if our tenants are physicians that own and refer to a hospital, the hospital would be limited in its operations and expansion potential, which may limit the hospital’s services and resulting revenues and may impact the owner’s ability to make rental payments.
Furthermore, the Healthcare Reform Act included new payment models with new shared savings programs and demonstration programs that include bundled payment models and payments contingent upon reporting on satisfaction of quality benchmarks. The new payment models will likely change how physicians are paid for services. These changes could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of some of our tenants.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was signed into law and repeals the individual mandate portion of the Healthcare Reform Act beginning in 2019. With the elimination of the individual mandate, several states brought suit seeking to invalidate the entire Affordable Care Act. In response, several other states intervened in the suit, seeking to uphold the Healthcare Reform Act. The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument from all sides on the matter in late 2020. •If all or a portion of the Healthcare Reform Act, including the individual mandate, is eventually ruled unconstitutional, our tenants may have more patients and residents who do not have insurance coverage, which may adversely impact the tenants’ collections and revenues. The financial impact on our tenants could restrict their ability to make rent payments to us, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to stockholders.
We cannot predict the ultimate content, timing or effect of any further healthcare reform legislation or the impact of potential legislation on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to stockholders. We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare services, which may adversely impact our tenants’ ability to make rental payments to us.
The current trend for seniors to delay moving to senior housing facilities until they require greater care or to forgo moving to senior housing facilities altogether, such action could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Seniors have been increasingly delaying their moves to senior housing facilities, including to our leased and managed senior housing facilities, until they require greater care, and increasingly forgoing moving to senior housing facilities altogether. The COVID-19 pandemic could cause seniors and their families to be reluctant to move into senior housing facilities during the pandemic. Further, rehabilitation therapy and other services are increasingly being provided to seniors on an outpatient basis or in seniors’ personal residences in response to market demand and government regulation, which may increase the trend for seniors to delay moving to senior housing facilities. Such delays may cause decreases in occupancy rates and increases in resident turnover rates at our senior housing facilities. Moreover, seniors may have greater care needs and require higher acuity services, which may increase our tenants’ and managers’ cost of business, expose our tenants and managers to additional liability or result in lost business and shorter stays at our leased and managed senior housing facilities if our tenants and managers are not able to provide the requisite care services or fail to adequately provide those services. These trends may negatively impact the occupancy rates, revenues, and cash flows at our leased and managed senior housing facilities and our results of operations. Further, if any of our tenants or managers are unable to offset lost revenues from these trends by providing and growing other revenue sources, such as new or increased service offerings to seniors, our senior housing facilities may be unprofitable and we may receive lower returns and rent, and the value of our senior housing facilities may decline.
Events that adversely affect the ability of seniors and their families to afford resident fees at our senior housing facilities could cause our occupancy rates, resident fee revenues and results of operations to decline.
Costs to seniors associated with independent and assisted living services are generally not reimbursable under government reimbursement programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. Only seniors with income or assets meeting or exceeding the comparable median in the regions where our facilities are located typically will be able to afford to pay the entrance fees and monthly resident fees, and a weak economy, depressed housing market or changes in demographics could adversely affect their continued ability to do so. If our tenants and operators are unable to retain and attract seniors with sufficient income, assets or other resources required to pay the fees associated with independent and assisted living services and other services provided by our tenants and operators at our healthcare facilities, our occupancy rates and resident fee revenues could decline, which could, in turn, materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make distributions to stockholders.
Some tenants of our current and future properties will be subject to fraud and abuse laws, the violation of which by a tenant may jeopardize the tenant’s ability to make rent payments to us.
There are various federal and state laws prohibiting fraudulent and abusive business practices by healthcare providers who participate in, receive payments from or are in a position to make referrals in connection with government-sponsored healthcare programs, including the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Our lease arrangements with certain current and future tenants may also be subject to these fraud and abuse laws. In order to support compliance with the fraud and abuse laws, our lease agreements may be required to satisfy individual state law requirements that vary from state to state, such as the Stark Law exception and the Anti-Kickback Statute safe harbor for lease arrangements, which impacts the terms and conditions that may be negotiated in the lease arrangements.
These federal laws include:
•the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, the offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration in return for, or to induce, the referral of any item or service reimbursed by state or federal healthcare programs;
•the Federal Physician Self-Referral Prohibition, which, subject to specific exceptions, restricts physicians from making referrals for specifically designated health services for which payment may be made under federal healthcare programs to an entity with which the physician, or an immediate family member, has a financial relationship;
•the False Claims Act, which prohibits any person from knowingly presenting false or fraudulent claims for payment to the federal government, including claims paid by the Medicare and Medicaid programs;
•the Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which authorizes the United States Department of Health & Human Services to impose monetary penalties or exclusion from participating in state or federal healthcare programs for certain fraudulent acts;
•the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended, or HIPAA, Fraud Statute, which makes it a federal crime to defraud any health benefit plan, including private payors; and
•the Exclusions Law, which authorizes the United States Department of Health & Human Services to exclude someone from participating in state or federal healthcare programs for certain fraudulent acts.
Each of these laws includes criminal and/or civil penalties for violations that range from punitive sanctions, damage assessments, penalties, imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid payments and/or exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Monetary penalties associated with violations of these laws have been increased in recent years. Certain laws, such as the False Claims Act, allow for individuals to bring whistleblower actions on behalf of the government for violations thereof. Additionally, states in which the facilities are located may have similar fraud and abuse laws. Investigation by a federal or state governmental body for violation of fraud and abuse laws or imposition of any of these penalties upon one of our tenants could jeopardize that tenant’s ability to operate or to make rent payments, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
In late 2020, the CMS and the United States Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General issued material revisions to rules and regulations relating to the federal Physician Self-Referral Prohibition and the federal Anti-Kickback Statute. While these revisions were designed to modernize the regulatory scheme and advance the transition to value-based care, there is little published guidance and interpretation with respect to the new regulations, which may lead to uncertainty for our tenants in trying to comply with the various safe harbors and exceptions to these laws.
Adverse trends in healthcare provider operations may negatively affect our lease revenues and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
The healthcare industry is currently experiencing:
•changes in the demand for and methods of delivering healthcare services;
•changes in third-party reimbursement policies;
•significant unused capacity in certain areas, which has created substantial competition for patients among healthcare providers in those areas;
•increased expense for uninsured patients;
•increased competition among healthcare providers;
•increased liability insurance expense;
•continued pressure by private and governmental payers to reduce payments to providers of services;
•increased scrutiny of billing, referral and other practices by federal and state authorities;
•changes in federal and state healthcare program payment models;
•increased emphasis on compliance with privacy and security requirements related to personal health information; and
•increased instability in the Health Insurance Exchange market and lack of access to insurance plans participating in the exchange.
Additionally, in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, many governmental entities relaxed certain licensure and other regulatory requirements relating to telemedicine, allowing more patients to virtually access care without having to visit a healthcare facility. If governmental and regulatory authorities continue to allow for increased virtual health care, this may affect the demand for some of our properties, such as MOBs.
These factors may adversely affect the economic performance of some or all of our tenants and, in turn, our lease revenues and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Operators/managers of healthcare properties that we own, or may acquire, may be affected by the financial deterioration, insolvency and/or bankruptcy of other significant operators/managers in the healthcare industry.
Certain companies in the healthcare industry, including some key senior housing operators/managers, are experiencing considerable financial, legal and/or regulatory difficulties which have resulted or may result in financial deterioration and, in some cases, insolvency and/or bankruptcy. The adverse effects on these companies could have a significant impact on the industry as a whole, including but not limited to negative public perception by investors, lenders and consumers. As a result, lessees of healthcare facilities that we own, or may acquire, could experience the damaging financial effects of a weakened industry sector driven by negative headlines, ultimately making them unable to meet their obligations to us, and our business could be adversely affected.
Our healthcare-related tenants may be subject to significant legal actions that could subject them to increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities, which may affect their ability to pay their rent payments to us.
As is typical in the healthcare industry, our healthcare-related tenants may often become subject to claims that their services have resulted in patient injury or other adverse effects. Many of these tenants may have experienced an increasing trend in the frequency and severity of professional liability and general liability insurance claims and litigation asserted against them. The insurance coverage maintained by these tenants may not cover all claims made against them nor continue to be available at a reasonable cost, if at all. In some states, insurance coverage for the risk of punitive damages arising from professional liability and general liability claims and/or litigation may not, in certain cases, be available to these tenants due to state law prohibitions or limitations of availability. As a result, these types of tenants of our MOBs, SNFs, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities operating in these states may be liable for punitive damage awards that are either not covered or are in excess of their insurance policy limits. We also believe that there has been, and will continue to be, an increase in governmental investigations of certain healthcare providers, particularly in the area of Medicare/Medicaid false claims, as well as an increase in enforcement actions resulting from these investigations. Insurance may not always be available to cover such losses. Any adverse determination in a legal proceeding or governmental investigation, whether currently asserted or arising in the future, could have a material adverse effect on a tenant’s financial condition. If a tenant is unable to obtain or maintain insurance coverage, if judgments are obtained in excess of the insurance coverage, if a tenant is required to pay uninsured punitive damages, or if a tenant is subject to an uninsurable government enforcement action, the tenant could be exposed to substantial additional liabilities, which may affect the tenant’s ability to pay rent, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
We, our tenants and our operators for our skilled nursing and senior housing facilities and SNFs may be subject to various government reviews, audits and investigations that could materially and adversely affect our business,us, including an obligation to refund amounts previously paid to us, potential criminal charges, the imposition of fines and/or the loss of the right to participate in Medicare and Medicaid programs.
We, our tenants and our operators for our skilled nursing and senior housing facilities are subjectRisks Related to various governmental reviews, audits and investigations to verify compliance with Medicare and Medicaid programs and applicable laws and regulations. We, our tenants and our operators for our skilled nursing and senior housing facilities are also subject to audits under various government programs, including Recovery Audit Contractors, Zone Program Integrity Contractors, Medicaid Integrity Contractors and Unified Program Integrity Contractor programs, in which third-party firms engaged by the CMS, conduct extensive reviews of claims data and medical and other records to identify potential improper payments under the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Private pay sources also reserve the right to conduct audits. An adverse review, audit or investigation could result in:Joint Ventures
•an obligation to refund amounts previously paid to us,Property ownership through joint ventures could limit our tenantscontrol of those investments or our operators pursuantdecisions with respect to the Medicare or Medicaid programs or from private payors, in amounts that could be materialother investments, restrict our ability to our business;
•state or federal agencies imposing fines, penaltiesoperate and other sanctions on us, our tenants or our operators;
•loss of our right, our tenants’ right or our operators’ right to participate in the Medicare or Medicaid programs or one or more private payor networks;
•an increase in private litigation against us, our tenants or our operators; and
•damage to our reputation in various markets.
While we, our tenants and our operators for our skilled nursing and senior housing facilities have always been subject to post-payment audits and reviews, more intensive “probe reviews” appear to be a permanent procedure with our fiscal intermediaries. If the government or court were to conclude that such errors, deficiencies or disagreements constituted criminal violations, or were to conclude that such errors, deficiencies or disagreements resulted in the submission of false claims to federal healthcare programs, or if the government were to discover other problems in addition to the ones identified by the probe reviews that rose to actionable levels, we and certain of our officers, and our tenants and operators for our skilled nursing, senior housing and integrated senior health campuses and certain of their officers, might face potential criminal charges and/or civil claims, administrative sanctions and penalties for amounts that could be material to our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, we and/or some of the key personnel of our operating subsidiaries, or those of our tenants and operators for our skilled nursing, senior housing and integrated senior health campuses, could be temporarily or permanently excluded from future participation in state and federal healthcare reimbursement programs such as Medicaid and Medicare. In any event, it is likely that a governmental investigation alone, regardless of its outcome, would divert material time, resources and attention from our management team and our staff, or those of our tenants and our operators for our skilled nursing, senior housing and integrated senior health campuses and could have a materially detrimental impactfinance properties on our results of operations during and after any such investigation or proceedings.
In cases where claim and documentation review by any CMS contractor results in repeated poor performance, a facility can be subjected to protracted oversight. This oversight may include repeat education and re-probe, extended pre-payment review, referral to recovery audit or integrity contractors, or extrapolation of an error rate to other reimbursement outside of specifically reviewed claims. Sustained failure to demonstrate improvement towards meeting all claim filing and documentation requirements could ultimately lead to Medicare and Medicaid decertification, which could have a materially detrimental impact on our results of operations. Adverse actions by CMS may also cause third-party payor or licensure authorities to audit our tenants. These additional audits could result in termination of third-party payor agreements or licensure of the facility, which would also adversely impact our operations.
In addition, our tenants and operators that accepted relief funds distributed to combat the adverse effects of COVID-19 and reimburse providers for unreimbursed expenses and lost revenues may be subject to certain reporting and auditing obligations associated with the receipt of such relief funds. If these tenants or operators fail to comply with the terms, and conditions associated with relief funds, they may be subject to government recovery and enforcement actions. Furthermore, regulatory guidance relating to use of the relief funds, recordkeeping requirements and other terms and conditions continues to evolve and there is a high degree of uncertainty surrounding many aspects of the relief funds. This uncertainty may create compliance challenges for tenants and operators who accepted relief funds.
The Healthcare Reform Law imposes additional requirements on SNFs regarding compliance and disclosure.
The Health Care and Education and Reconciliation Act of 2010, or the Healthcare Reform Law, requires SNFs to have a compliance and ethics program that is effective in preventing and detecting criminal, civil and administrative violations and in promoting quality of care. The United States Department of Health and Human Services included in the final rule published on October 4, 2016 the requirement for operators to implement a compliance and ethics program as a condition of participation in Medicare and Medicaid. Long-term care facilities, including SNFs, had until November 28, 2019 to comply. If our operators fall short inreduce their compliance and ethics programs and quality assurance and performance improvement programs, if and when required, their reputations and ability to attract residents could be adversely affected.expected return.
Risks Related to Debt FinancingReal Estate-Related Investments
Changes•Unfavorable real estate market conditions and delays in banks’ inter-bank lending rate reporting practicesliquidating defaulted mortgage loan investments may negatively impact mortgage loans in which we have invested and may invest, which could result in losses to us.
•We expect a portion of our real estate-related investments to be illiquid, and we may not be able to adjust our portfolio in a timely manner in response to changes in economic and other conditions.
Risks Related to the Healthcare Industry
•The healthcare industry is heavily regulated, and new laws or regulations, changes to existing laws or regulations, loss of licensure or failure to obtain licensure could result in the method pursuantinability of our tenants to which LIBOR is determined maymake rent payments to us or adversely affect the value of the financial obligations to be held or issued by us that are linked to LIBOR.
London Interbank Offering Rate, or LIBOR, and other indices which are deemed “benchmarks” are the subject of recent national, international and other regulatory guidance and proposals for reform. Some of these reforms are already effective while others are still to be implemented. These reforms may cause such “benchmarks” to perform differently than in the past, or have other consequences which cannot be predicted. It currently appears that, over time, United States dollar LIBOR may be replaced by the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR, published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. However, the manner and timing of this shift is currently unknown. Market participants are still considering how various types of financial instruments and securitization vehicles should react to a discontinuation of LIBOR. It is possible that not all of our assets and liabilities will transition away from LIBOR at the same time, or to the same alternative reference rate, in each case increasing the difficulty of hedging. The process of transition involves operational risks. It is also possible that no transition will occur for many financial instruments. At this time, it is not possible to predict the effect of any such changes, any establishment of alternative reference rates or any other reforms to LIBOR that may be implemented. Uncertainty as to the nature of such potential changes, alternative reference rates or other reforms may adversely affect the market for or value of any securities on which the interest or dividend is determined by reference to LIBOR, loans, derivatives and other financial obligations or on our overall financial condition or results of operations. More generally, any of the above changes or any other consequential changes to LIBOR or any other “benchmark” as a result of international, national or other proposals for reform or other initiatives, or any further uncertainty in relation to the timing and manner of implementation of such changes, could have a material adverse effect on the value of financial assets and liabilities based on or linked to a “benchmark.”
Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments, and therefore, negatively impact our operating results.
Interest we pay on our debt obligations will reduce cash available for distributions. Whenever we incur variable rate debt, increases in interest rates would increase our interest costs, which would reduce our cash flows and ouroperators’ ability to pay distributions to our stockholders. If we need to repay existing debt during periods of rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of our investmentsoperate facilities held in properties at times which may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments.
In addition, our variable-rate debt instruments use LIBOR as a benchmark for establishing the interest rate. In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority, or FCA, that regulates LIBOR announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. As a result, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkRIDEA structures.
organized•Reimbursement rates from third-party payors, including Medicare and Medicaid, that do not rise as quickly, or at all, compared to the Alternative Reference Rates Committee which identified SOFR as its preferred alternativerate of inflation, could adversely affect our tenants’ operations and ability to United States dollar LIBORmake rental payments to us or our profitability from operating facilities held in derivatives and other financial contracts. We are not ableRIDEA structures.
•If seniors delay moving to predict when LIBOR will ceasesenior housing facilities until they require greater care or forgo moving to be available or when there will be sufficient liquidity in the SOFR markets. Any changes adopted by FCA or other governing bodies in the method used for determining LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR. In addition, uncertainty about the extent and manner of future changes may result in interest rates and/or payments that are higher or lower than if LIBOR were to remain available in its current form. The consequences of these developments are uncertain, butsenior housing facilities altogether, such action could include an increase in the cost of our variable-rate debt instruments. If LIBOR is no longer widely available, or otherwise at our option, we may need to renegotiate with our lenders that utilize LIBOR as a factor in determining the interest rate to replace LIBOR with the new standard that is established. As such, the potential phase-out of LIBOR may have a material adverse effect on us.
•We, our tenants and our operators for our senior housing facilities and SNFs may be subject to various government reviews, audits and investigations that could materially and adversely affect us, including an obligation to refund amounts previously paid to us, potential criminal charges, the interest rates on our current and future borrowings.
Toimposition of fines and/or the extent we borrow at fixed rates or enter into fixed interest rate swaps, we will not benefit from reduced interest expense if interest rates decrease.
We are exposed to the effects of interest rate changes primarily as a result of borrowings we have used to maintain liquidity and fund expansion and refinancing of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. To limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings, prepayment penalties and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs while taking into account variable interest rate risk, we have borrowed and may continue to borrow at fixed rates or variable rates depending upon prevailing market conditions. We have and may also continue to enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and caps in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. Therefore, to the extent we borrow at fixed rates or enter into fixed interest rate swaps, we will not benefit from reduced interest expense if interest rates decrease.
Hedging activity may expose us to risks.
We have used and may continue to use derivative financial instruments to hedge our exposure to changes in exchange rates and interest rates on loans secured by our assets. If we use derivative financial instruments to hedge against interest rate fluctuations, we will be exposed to credit risk and legal enforceability risks. In this context, credit risk is the failureloss of the counterpartyright to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. Legal enforceability risks encompass general contractual risks, including the risk that the counterparty will breach the terms of, or failparticipate in Medicare and Medicaid programs.
Risks Related to perform its obligations under, the derivative contract. These derivative instruments are speculative in nature and there is no guarantee that they will be effective. If we are unable to manage these risks effectively, our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected.Joint Ventures
Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which•Property ownership through joint ventures could limit our abilitycontrol of those investments or our decisions with respect to pay distributions to our stockholders.
When providing financing, a lender may impose restrictions on us that affectother investments, restrict our ability to incur additional debtoperate and affect our distribution and operating strategies. We may enter into loan documents that contain covenants that limit our ability to further mortgage the property, discontinue insurance coverage, or replace our advisor. These or other limitations may adversely affect our flexibility and our ability to achieve our investment objectives.
Interest-only indebtedness may increase our risk of default, adversely affect our ability to refinance or sellfinance properties and ultimately may reduce our funds available for distribution to our stockholders.
We may finance or refinance our properties using interest-only mortgage indebtedness. During the interest-only period, the amount of each scheduled payment will be less than that of a traditional amortizing mortgage loan. The principal balance of the mortgage loan will not be reduced (except in the case of prepayments) because there are no scheduled monthly payments of principal during this period. After the interest-only period, we will be required either to make scheduled payments of amortized principal and interest or to make a lump-sum or “balloon” payment at maturity. At the time such a balloon payment is due, we may or may not be able to refinance the balloon payment on terms as favorable as the original loan or sell the particular property at a price sufficient to make the balloon payment. Furthermore, these required principal or balloon payments will increase the amount of our scheduled payments and may increase our risk of default under the related mortgage loan. If the mortgage loan has an adjustable interest rate, the amount of our scheduled payments also may increase at a time of rising interest rates. In addition, payments of principal and interest made to service our debts, including balloon payments, may leave us with insufficient cash to pay the distributions that we are required to pay to maintain our qualification as a REIT. Any of these results would have a significant, negative impact on our stockholders’ investment.
If we are required to make payments under any “bad boy” carve-out guaranties that we may provide in connection with certain mortgages and related loans, our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected.
In obtaining certain nonrecourse loans, we may provide standard carve-out guaranties. These guaranties are only applicable if and when the borrower directly, or indirectly through agreement with an affiliate, joint venture partner or other third party, voluntarily files a bankruptcy or similar liquidation or reorganization action or takes other actions that are fraudulent or improper (commonly referred to as “bad boy” guaranties). Although we believe that “bad boy” carve-out guaranties are not guaranties of payment in the event of foreclosure or other actions of the foreclosing lender that are beyond the borrower’s control, some lenders in the real estate industry have recently sought to make claims for payment under such guaranties. In the event such a claim were made against us under a “bad boy” carve-out guaranty following foreclosure on mortgages or related loan, and such claim were successful, our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected.
Risks Related to Real Estate-Related Investments
The real estate-related investments in which we may invest and the loans underlying such real estate-related investments may be impacted by unfavorable•Unfavorable real estate market conditions and delays in liquidating defaulted mortgage loan investments may negatively impact mortgage loans in which we have invested and may invest, which could result in losses to us.
•We expect a portion of our real estate-related investments to be illiquid, and we may not be able to adjust our portfolio in a timely manner in response to changes in economic and other conditions.
Risks Related to the Healthcare Industry
•The healthcare industry is heavily regulated, and new laws or regulations, changes to existing laws or regulations, loss of licensure or failure to obtain licensure could result in the inability of our tenants to make rent payments to us or adversely affect our operators’ ability to operate facilities held in RIDEA structures.
•Reimbursement rates from third-party payors, including Medicare and Medicaid, that do not rise as quickly, or at all, compared to the rate of inflation, could adversely affect our tenants’ operations and ability to make rental payments to us or our profitability from operating facilities held in RIDEA structures.
•If seniors delay moving to senior housing facilities until they require greater care or forgo moving to senior housing facilities altogether, such action could have a material adverse effect on us.
•We, our tenants and our operators for our senior housing facilities and SNFs may be subject to various government reviews, audits and investigations that could materially and adversely affect us, including an obligation to refund amounts previously paid to us, potential criminal charges, the imposition of fines and/or the loss of the right to participate in Medicare and Medicaid programs.
Risks Related to Joint Ventures
•Property ownership through joint ventures could limit our control of those investments or our decisions with respect to other investments, restrict our ability to operate and finance properties on our terms, and reduce their expected return.
Risks Related to Debt Financing
•We have substantial indebtedness and may incur additional indebtedness in the future, which could materially and adversely affect us.
•To the extent we borrow funds at floating interest rates, we will be adversely affected by rising interest rates unless fully hedged. Rising interest rates will also increase our interest expense on future fixed-rate debt.
•Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants that could adversely affect our business.
Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure and Organization
•Our charter imposes a limit on the percentage of shares of our common stock or capital stock that any person may own, and such limit may discourage a takeover or business combination that may have benefited our stockholders.
Risks Related to Taxes and Our REIT Status
•Failure to maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes would subject us to U.S. federal income tax on our REIT taxable income at the regular corporate rate, which would substantially increase our income tax expenses and reduce our distributions to our stockholders.
•We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could increase our tax liability or reduce our operating flexibility.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
•An active trading market for our common stock may not be maintained.
•The market price and trading volume of shares of our common stock may be volatile.
•Because we have a large number of stockholders and shares of our common stock have not been listed on a national securities exchange until recently, there may be significant pent-up demand to sell shares of our common stock (including our Class T common stock and Class I common stock). Significant sales of shares of our common stock, or the perception that significant sales of such shares could occur, may cause the price of shares of our common stock to decline significantly.
•Future offerings of debt securities, which would be senior to our common stock, or equity securities, which would dilute our existing stockholders and may be senior to our common stock, may adversely affect our stockholders.
•We may be unable to raise additional capital on favorable terms, or at all, needed to grow our business.
•Prior to our recent NYSE listing, we had no operating history as a publicly traded company and may not be able to successfully operate as a publicly traded company.
Risks Related to Our Business and Financial Results
We are dependent on tenants for our revenue, and lease terminations could reduce our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
The successful performance of our real estate investments is materially dependent on the financial stability of our tenants. Lease payment defaults by tenants would cause us to lose the revenue associated with such leases and could reduce our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. If a property is subject to a mortgage, a default by a significant tenant on its lease payments to us may result in a foreclosure on the property if we are unable to find an alternative source of revenue to meet our mortgage payments. In the event of a tenant default, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-leasing our property. Further, we cannot assure our stockholders that we will be able to re-lease the property for the rent previously received, if at all, or that lease terminations will not cause us to sell the property at a loss.
The financial deterioration, insolvency or bankruptcy of one or more of our major tenants, operators, borrowers or other obligors could have a material adverse effect on us.
A downturn in any of our tenants’, operators’, borrowers’ or other obligors’ businesses could ultimately lead to voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy or similar insolvency proceedings, including but not limited to assignment for the benefit of creditors, reorganization, liquidation or winding-up. Bankruptcy and insolvency laws afford certain rights to a defaulting tenant, operator or borrower that has filed for bankruptcy or reorganization that may render certain of our remedies unenforceable or, at the least, delay our ability to pursue such remedies and realize any related recoveries. A debtor has the right to assume, or to assume and assign to a third party, or to reject its executory contracts and unexpired leases in a bankruptcy proceeding. If a debtor were to reject its leases with us, obligations under such rejected leases would cease. The claim against the rejecting debtor would be an unsecured claim, which would be limited by the statutory cap set forth in the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, and there may be insufficient assets to satisfy all unsecured claims, even ones limited by the statutory cap. This statutory cap may be substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed under the lease. In addition, a debtor may also assert in bankruptcy proceedings that leases should be re-characterized as financing agreements, which could result in our being deemed a lender instead of a landlord. A lender’s rights and remedies, as compared to a landlord’s, generally are materially less favorable, and our rights as a lender may be subordinated to other creditors’ rights.
Furthermore, the automatic stay provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code would preclude us from enforcing our remedies unless we first obtain relief from the court having jurisdiction over the bankruptcy case. This would effectively limit or delay our ability to collect unpaid rent or interest payments, and we may ultimately not receive any payment at all. In addition, we would likely be required to fund certain expenses and obligations to preserve the value of our properties, avoid the imposition of liens on our properties or transition our properties to a new tenant or operator. Additionally, we lease many of our properties to healthcare providers who provide long-term custodial care to the elderly. Evicting operators for failure to pay rent while the property is occupied typically involves specific procedural or regulatory requirements and may not be successful. Even if eviction is possible, we may determine not to do so due to reputational or other risks. Bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings typically also result in increased costs to the operator, significant management distraction and performance declines. If we are unable to transition affected properties, they would likely experience prolonged operational disruption, leading to lower occupancy rates and further depressed revenues. Publicity about the operator’s financial troubles and bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings may also negatively impact their and our reputations, decreasing customer demand and revenues. Any or all of these risks could have a material adverse effect on us.
We have experienced net losses in the past and we may experience additional losses in the future.
Historically, we have experienced net losses (calculated in accordance with GAAP), and we may not be profitable or realize growth in the value of our investments. Many of our losses can be attributed to general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, as well as acquisition expenses incurred in connection with purchasing properties or making other investments. For a further discussion of our operational history and the factors affecting our net losses, see Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our prior performance may not be an accurate predictor of our ability to achieve our business objectives or of our future results.
Our stockholders should not rely on our past performance to predict our future results. Our stockholders should review our prospects in light of the risks, uncertainties and difficulties frequently encountered by companies that have a limited operating history, many of which may be beyond our control. For example, due to challenging economic conditions in the past, distributions to stockholders were reduced. Therefore, to be successful in this market, we must, among other things:
•successfully manage our assets;
•attract, integrate, motivate and retain qualified personnel to manage our day-to-day operations; and
•respond to competition both for investment opportunities and potential investors’ investment in us.
We cannot guarantee that we will succeed in achieving these goals, and our failure to do so could materially and adversely affect us and the market price of our common stock could be highly volatile and decline significantly and our stockholders could lose all or a portion of their investment.
Our success is dependent on the performance and continued contributions of certain of our key personnel, and, in the event they are no longer employed by us, we could be materially and adversely affected.
Our success depends, to a significant degree, upon the continued contributions of our executives and key officers. In particular, Danny Prosky would be difficult to replace. Mr. Prosky currently serves as our Chief Executive Officer and one of our directors. In the event that Mr. Prosky or one of our other executives or key executive officers are no longer employed by us, for any reason, it could have a material adverse effect on us, and we may not be able to attract and hire equally capable individuals to replace them. If we were to lose the benefit of the experience, efforts and abilities of one or more of our executives or other key officers, we could be materially and adversely affected.
Our financial results and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders are subject to international, national and local market conditions we cannot control or predict.
We are subject to the risks of an international or national economic slowdown or downturn and other changes in international, national and local market conditions. The following factors may have affected, and may continue to affect, income from our properties, our ability to acquire and develop properties, and our overall financial results and ability to make distributions to our stockholders:
•poor economic times may result in defaults by tenants of our properties due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity or operational failures. We may provide rent concessions, tenant improvement expenditures or reduced rental rates to maintain or increase occupancy levels;
•fluctuations as a result of supply and demand imbalances and reduced occupancies and rental rates may cause the properties that we own to decrease in value. Consequently, we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of our properties, which may require us to recognize an impairment charge or record a loss on sale in our financial results;
•reduced values of our properties may limit our ability to obtain or maintain debt financing secured by our properties and may reduce the availability of unsecured loans;
•constricted access to credit may result in tenant defaults or non-renewals under leases;
•layoffs may lead to a lower demand for medical services and cause vacancies to increase and a lack of future population and job growth may make it difficult to maintain or increase occupancy levels;
•disruptions in the financial markets, deterioration in economic conditions or a public health crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, have resulted in the past, and may result in the future, in lower occupancy in our facilities, increased vacancy rates for commercial real estate due to generally lower demand for rentable space, as well as an oversupply of rentable space;
•governmental actions and initiatives, including risks associated with the impact of a prolonged government shutdown or budgetary reductions or impasses; and
•increased insurance premiums, real estate taxes or utilities or other expenses, such as inflation costs, will decrease our financial results and may reduce funds available for distribution to our stockholders or, to the extent such increases are passed through to tenants, may lead to tenant defaults. Also, any such increased expenses may not coincide with our ability to increase rents to tenants on turnover, which would adversely impact our financial results.
The length and severity of any economic slowdown or downturn cannot be predicted with confidence at this time. We have been, and we expect may continue to be, negatively impacted to the extent an economic slowdown or downturn is prolonged or becomes more severe.
We face significant competition for the acquisition and disposition of OM buildings, senior housing, SNFs and other healthcare-related facilities, which may impede our ability to take, and increase the cost of, such actions, which may materially and adversely affect us.
We face significant competition from other entities engaged in real estate investment activities for acquisitions and dispositions of OM buildings, senior housing, SNFs and other healthcare-related facilities, some of whom may have greater resources, lower costs of capital and higher risk tolerances than we do. Increased competition makes it more challenging for us to identify and successfully capitalize on opportunities that meet our business objectives and could improve the bargaining power of our counterparties, thereby impeding our investment, acquisition and disposition activities. If we pay higher prices per property or receive lower prices for dispositions of our OM buildings, senior housing, SNFs or other healthcare-related facilities as a result of such competition, we may be materially and adversely affected.
Our investments in, and acquisitions of, OM buildings, senior housing, SNFs and other healthcare-related facilities may be unsuccessful or fail to meet our expectations.
Some of our acquisitions may not prove to be successful. We could encounter unanticipated difficulties and expenditures relating to any acquired properties, including contingent liabilities, and acquired properties might require significant management attention that would otherwise be devoted to our ongoing business. Such expenditures may negatively affect our results of operations. Investments in and acquisitions of OM buildings, senior housing, SNFs and other healthcare-related facilities entail risks associated with real estate investments generally, including risks that the investment will not achieve expected returns, that the cost estimates for necessary property improvements will prove inaccurate or that the tenant or operator will fail to meet performance expectations. In addition, we may not be able to identify off-market or other investment opportunities or investment opportunities that are strategically marketed to a limited number of investors at the rate that we anticipate or at all. We may be unable to obtain or assume financing for acquisitions on favorable terms or at all. Healthcare properties are often highly customizable and the development or redevelopment of such properties may require costly tenant-specific improvements. We may experience delays and disruptions to property redevelopment as a result of supply chain issues and construction material and labor shortages. We also may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly acquisitions of portfolios of properties, into our existing operations, and this could have a material adverse effect on us. Acquired properties may be located in new markets, either within or outside the United States, where we may face risks associated with a lack of market knowledge or understanding of the local economy, lack of business relationships in the area, costs associated with opening a new regional office, and unfamiliarity with local governmental and permitting procedures. As a result, we cannot assure our stockholders that we will achieve the economic benefit we expect from acquisitions, investment, development and redevelopment opportunities and may lead to impairment of such assets.
We are uncertain of all of our sources of debt or equity for funding our capital needs. If we cannot obtain funding on favorable terms, our ability to acquire, and make necessary capital improvements to, properties may be impaired or delayed, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
We have not identified all of our sources of debt or equity for funding, and such sources of funding may not be available to us on favorable terms or at all. If we do not have access to sufficient funding on favorable terms in the future, we may not be able to acquire new properties, make necessary capital improvements to our existing properties, pay other expenses, exercise our option to purchase the remaining 24.0% minority membership interest held by our joint venture partner in Trilogy REIT Holdings (the purchase price of which must include at least a minimum cash consideration as defined in Note 13, Equity — Noncontrolling Interests in Total Equity — Membership Interest in Trilogy REIT Holdings, or the Minimum Cash Consideration) or expand our business when desired, or at all, which would have a material adverse effect on us.
All of our integrated senior health campuses are managed by the Trilogy Manager and account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income. Adverse developments in the Trilogy Manager’s business or financial strength could have a material adverse effect on us.
The Trilogy Manager manages all of the day-to-day operations for all of our integrated senior health campuses pursuant to a long-term management agreement. These integrated senior health campuses accounted for approximately 43.6% of our portfolio (based on aggregate contract purchase price) as of December 31, 2023 and contributed approximately 51.0% of our annualized base rent/annualized net operating income, or NOI, as of such date. Although we have various rights as the joint venture owner of these integrated senior health campuses under our management agreement, we rely on the Trilogy Manager’s personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our integrated senior health campuses operations efficiently and effectively, and to identify and manage development opportunities for new integrated senior health campuses. We also rely on the Trilogy Manager to provide accurate campus-level financial results for our integrated senior health campuses in a timely manner and to otherwise operate our integrated senior health campuses in compliance with the terms of our management agreement and all applicable laws and regulations. We depend on the Trilogy Manager’s ability to attract and retain skilled personnel to provide these services. A shortage of nurses or other trained personnel or general inflationary pressures may force the Trilogy Manager to enhance its pay and benefits package to compete effectively for such personnel, the cost of which we would bear in proportion to our joint venture interest, but it may not be able to offset these added costs by increasing the rates charged to residents. As such, any adverse developments in the Trilogy Manager’s business or financial strength, including its ability to retain key personnel, could impair its ability to manage our integrated senior health campuses efficiently and effectively and could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, if the Trilogy Manager experiences any significant financial, legal, accounting or regulatory difficulties due to a weak economy, industry downturn or otherwise, such difficulties could result in, among other adverse events, acceleration of its indebtedness, impairment of its continued access to capital, the enforcement of default remedies by its counterparties or the commencement of insolvency proceedings by or against it under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Any one or a combination of these risks could have a material adverse effect on us. If we exercise our option to purchase the remaining 24.0% minority membership interest held by our joint venture partner in Trilogy REIT Holdings, our indirect ownership of the assets managed by the Trilogy Manager would increase from 74.1% to 97.5% (in all cases assuming that there are no changes in the equity capitalization of Trilogy prior to consummation of the purchase).
In the event that our management agreement with the Trilogy Manager is terminated or not renewed, we may be unable to replace the Trilogy Manager with another suitable operator, or, if we were successful in locating such an operator, we cannot guarantee that it would manage the integrated senior health campuses efficiently and effectively or that any such transition would be completed timely, which may have a material adverse effect on us.
In the event we were to contemplate pursuing any existing or future contractual rights or remedies under our management agreement with the Trilogy Manager, including termination rights, we would consider numerous factors, including legal, contractual, regulatory, business and other relevant considerations. In the event that we exercise our rights to terminate the management agreement with the Trilogy Manager for any reason or such agreements are not renewed upon expiration of their value.terms, we would attempt to reposition the affected integrated senior health campuses with another operator. Although we believe that other qualified national and regional operators would be interested in managing our integrated senior health campuses, we cannot provide any assurance that we would be able to locate another suitable operator or, if we were successful in locating such an operator, that it would manage the integrated senior health campuses efficiently and effectively or that any such transition would be completed timely or would not require substantial capital expenditures. Any such transition would likely result in disruption of the operation of such facilities, including matters relating to staffing and reporting. Moreover, the transition to a replacement operator may require approval by the applicable regulatory authorities and, in most cases, one or more of our lenders, including the mortgage lenders for certain of the integrated senior health campuses, and we cannot provide any assurance that such approvals would be granted on a timely basis, if at all. Any inability to replace or delay in replacing the Trilogy Manager as the operator of our integrated senior health campuses with a highly qualified successor on favorable terms could have a material adverse effect on us.
We may incur additional costs in re-leasing properties with specialized uses, which could materially and adversely affect us.
Some of the properties we have acquired and will seek to acquire are healthcare properties designed or built primarily for a particular tenant of a specific type of use known as a single-user facility. If we or our tenants terminate the leases for these properties or our tenants default on their lease obligations or lose their regulatory authority to operate such properties, we may not be able to locate suitable replacement tenants to lease the properties for their specialized uses. Alternatively, we may be required to spend substantial amounts to adapt the properties to other uses or incur other significant re-leasing costs. Any loss of revenues or additional capital expenditures required as a result may have a material adverse effect on us.
We may be unable to secure funds for future tenant or other capital improvements, which could limit our ability to attract, replace or retain tenants, pay our expenses and make distributions to our stockholders.
When tenants do not renew their leases or otherwise vacate their space, in order to attract replacement tenants, we have expended, and may be required to expend in the future, substantial funds for tenant improvements and leasing commissions related to the vacated space. Such tenant improvements have required, and may continue to require, us to incur substantial capital expenditures. If we have not established capital reserves for such tenant or other capital improvements, we will have to obtain financing from other sources. We may also have future financing needs for other capital improvements to refurbish or renovate our properties. If we need to secure financing sources for tenant or other capital improvements in the future, but are unable to secure such financing or are unable to secure financing on terms we feel are acceptable, we may be unable to make tenant and other capital improvements, or we may be required to defer such improvements. If this happens, it may cause one or more of our properties to suffer from a greater risk of obsolescence or a decline in value or a greater risk of decreased cash flows as a result of fewer potential tenants being attracted to the property or our existing tenants not renewing their leases. If we do not have access to sufficient funding in the future, we may also not be able to pay our expenses or make distributions to our stockholders.
A breach of information technology systems on which we rely could materially and adversely impact us.
We and our tenants and operators rely on information technology systems, including the internet and networks and systems maintained and controlled by third-party vendors and other third parties, to process, transmit and store information and to manage or support our business processes. Third-party vendors collect and hold personally identifiable information and other confidential information of our tenants, operators, patients, stockholders and employees. We also maintain confidential financial and business information regarding us and persons and entities with which we do business on our information technology systems. While we have enhanced our information technology systems in response to the general cybersecurity threat environment in recent years, we are not aware of any specific cybersecurity threat, including as a result of any previous cybersecurity or information security incident or breach, that has had a material effect on us, including our business strategy, results of operation or financial condition. However, there can be no assurances that a cybersecurity threat or incident that could have a material impact on us has not occurred or will not occur in the future.
While we and our tenants and operators take steps to protect the security of the information maintained in our information technology systems, including the use of commercially available systems, software, tools and monitoring to provide security for processing, transmitting and storing of the information, it is possible that such security measures will not be able to prevent human error or the systems’ improper functioning, or the loss, misappropriation, disclosure or corruption of personally identifiable information or other confidential or sensitive information, including information about our tenants and employees. Cybersecurity breaches, including physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses, phishing scams, attacks by hackers, breaches due to employee error or misconduct and similar breaches can create and, in some instances in the past, have resulted in, system disruptions, shutdowns or unauthorized access to information maintained on our information technology systems or the information technology systems of our third-party vendors or other third parties or otherwise cause disruption or negative impacts to occur to our business and materially and adversely affect us. While we and, we believe, most of our tenants and operators maintain cyber risk insurance to provide some coverage for certain risks arising out of cybersecurity breaches, there is no assurance that such insurance would cover all or a significant portion of the costs or consequences associated with a cybersecurity breach. As our reliance on technology increases, so will the risks posed to our information systems, both internal and those we outsource. In addition, as the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to information technology systems become more varied and sophisticated and the occurrence of such breaches becomes more frequent, we and our third-party vendors and other third parties may be unable to adequately anticipate these techniques or breaches and implement appropriate preventative measures. There is no guarantee that any processes, procedures and internal controls we have implemented or will implement will prevent cyber intrusions. Any failure to prevent cybersecurity breaches and maintain the proper function, security and availability of our or our third-party vendors’ and other third parties’ information technology systems could interrupt our operations, damage our reputation and brand, damage our competitive position, make it difficult for us to attract and retain tenants and subject us to liability claims or regulatory penalties, which could materially and adversely affect us. Additionally, as increased regulatory compliance for cybersecurity protocols and disclosures, including rules requiring prompt disclosure of any material cybersecurity breaches or incidents, are required by state or federal authorities, the increased amount of resources, both time and expense, could also materially and adversely affect us, and we may be subject to regulatory action and lawsuits, should we fail to comply with such obligations.
Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate
Uncertain market conditions could lead our real estate investments to decrease in value or may cause us to sell our properties at a loss in the future.
Our management, subject to the oversight of our board, may exercise its discretion as to whether and when to sell a property, and we have no obligation to sell properties at any particular time or at all. We cannot predict with any certainty the various market conditions affecting real estate investments that will exist at any particular time in the future. As such, we may be purchasing our properties at a time when capitalization rates are at historically low levels and purchase prices are high. In addition, we may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold. We may not have adequate funds available to correct such defects or to make such improvements. Moreover, in acquiring a property, we may agree to restrictions that prohibit the sale of that property for a period of time or impose other restrictions, such as a limitation on the amount of debt that can be placed or repaid on that property. We cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property. The value of our properties may not increase over time, which may restrict our ability to sell our properties, or in the event we are able to sell such properties, may lead to sale prices less than the prices that we paid to purchase the properties or the price at which we value the property. Additionally, we may incur prepayment penalties in the event we sell a property subject to a mortgage earlier than we otherwise had planned. Accordingly, our ability to realize potential appreciation on our real estate investments and make distributions to our stockholders will, among other things, be dependent upon uncertain market conditions.
Most of our costs, such as operating and general and administrative expenses, interest expense and real estate acquisition and construction costs, are subject to inflation and may not be recoverable.
A significant portion of our operating expenses is sensitive to inflation. These include expenses for property-related costs such as insurance, utilities and repairs and maintenance. We also have ground lease expenses in certain of our properties. Ground lease costs are contractual, but in some cases, lease payments reset every few years based on changes on consumer price indexes.
Operating expenses on our non-RIDEA properties, with the exception of ground lease rental expenses, are typically recoverable through our lease arrangements, which allow us to pass through substantially all expenses associated with property taxes, insurance, utilities, repairs and maintenance and other operating expenses (including increases thereto) to our tenants. As of December 31, 2023, the majority of our existing leases were either triple-net leases or leases that allow us to recover certain operating expenses and certain capital expenditures. Our remaining leases are generally modified gross, or base year, leases, which only provide for recoveries of operating expenses above the operating expenses from the initial year within each lease. During inflationary periods such as those prevailing in recent years, we have historically been able to and expect to recover increases in operating expenses from our triple-net leases and our gross leases. For our RIDEA properties, increases in operating expenses, including labor, that are caused by inflationary pressures will generally be passed through to us and may materially and adversely affect us.
Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation costs, as well as professional and legal fees. Annually, our employee compensation is adjusted to reflect merit increases; however, in order for us to maintain our ability to successfully compete for the best talent, rising inflation rates in recent years have required, and may continue to require, us to provide compensation increases beyond historical annual merit increases, which may significantly increase our compensation costs. Similarly, professional and legal fees are also subject to the impact of inflation and expected to increase proportionately with increasing market prices for such services. Consequently, inflation is expected to increase our general and administrative expenses over time and may materially and adversely affect us.
Also, during inflationary periods, interest rates have historically increased, which in recent years have increased the interest expense of our borrowings and could do so again. Our exposure to increases in interest rates is limited to our variable-rate borrowings, which consist of borrowings under our credit facilities and variable-rate mortgage loans payable. During 2023, we entered into interest rate swap contracts to hedge $750,000,000 of our variable-rate credit facilities. As of December 31, 2023, our outstanding debt aggregated to $2,551,036,000, of which 31.8% was unhedged variable-rate debt. The rise in interest rates has also increased our interest expense on future fixed-rate borrowings. Therefore, a significant increase in inflation or interest rates would have a material adverse impact on our financing costs and interest expense.
We have long-term lease agreements with our tenants that contain effective annual rent escalations that were either fixed or indexed based on a consumer price index or other index. We believe our annual lease expirations allow us to reset these leases to market rents upon renewal or re-leasing and that annual rent escalations within our long-term leases are generally sufficient to offset the effect of inflation on non-recoverable costs, such as general and administrative expenses and interest expense. In addition, our leases often obligate the tenants to pay a pro rata share of any increase in operating expenses. However, it is possible that during higher inflationary periods, the impact of inflation will not be adequately offset by the
resetting of rents from our renewal and re-leasing activities, our annual rent escalations or the tenants’ pro rata payment of the increase in operating expenses. As a result, during periods when the impact of inflation exceeds the annual rent escalation percentages in our current leases and the percentage increase in rents in new leases, our financial results may be impaired.
Additionally, inflationary pricing may have a negative effect on the acquisition and construction costs necessary to complete our development and redevelopment projects, including, but not limited to, costs of construction materials, labor and services from third-party contractors and suppliers. Higher acquisition and construction costs could adversely impact our net investments in real estate and expected yields in our development and redevelopment projects, which may make otherwise lucrative investment opportunities less profitable to us. Any of these matters may materially and adversely affect us over time.
Our high concentrations of properties in particular geographic areas magnify the effects of negative conditions affecting those geographic areas.
We have a concentration of properties in particular geographic areas; therefore, any adverse situation that disproportionately effects one of those areas would have a magnified adverse effect on our portfolio. As of December 31, 2023, properties located in Indiana and Michigan accounted for approximately 35.3% and 10.4%, respectively, of our total property portfolio’s annualized base rent or annualized NOI. Accordingly, there is a geographic concentration of risk subject to fluctuations in each such state’s economy, real estate and other market conditions.
Our real estate investments may be concentrated in OM buildings, senior housing, SNFs or other healthcare-related facilities, making us more vulnerable to negative factors affecting these classes than if our investments were diversified beyond the healthcare industry.
As a REIT, we invest primarily in real estate. Within the real estate industry, we have acquired, developed and owned, and may continue to acquire, or selectively develop and own, OM buildings, senior housing, SNFs and other healthcare-related facilities. As of December 31, 2023, our three major asset class concentrations (based on aggregate contract purchase price) were senior housing 37.6%, SNFs 29.9% and OM buildings 27.5%. We are subject to risks inherent in concentrating investments in real estate. These risks resulting from a lack of diversification become even greater as a result of our business objectives and growth strategies, which involve investing substantially all of our assets in clinical healthcare real estate.
A downturn in the commercial real estate industry generally could significantly adversely affect the value of our properties. A downturn in the healthcare industry could negatively affect our lessees’ ability to make lease payments to us and our operators’ ability to manage our properties efficiently and effectively. These matters could materially and adversely affect us and could be more pronounced than if we diversified our investments outside of real estate or if our portfolio did not include a substantial concentration in OM buildings, senior housing, SNFs or healthcare-related facilities.
Our buildings that are subject to ground leases could restrict our use of such facilities.
Our buildings that are subject to ground leases could restrict our use of such facilities. As of December 31, 2023, we own fee simple interests in all of our land, buildings and campuses, except for the following properties that are located on land that is subject to ground leases: (a) 19 OM buildings; (b) five integrated senior health campuses; and (c) one SNF, in each case, for which we own fee simple interests in the building and other improvements on such properties. Additionally, we operate 20 integrated senior health campuses that were leased to Trilogy by third parties. These ground leases contain certain restrictions. These restrictions include limits on our use of the facilities and ability to lease, sell or obtain mortgage financing secured by the facilities. There can be no assurance that the ground leases can be extended beyond the stated terms. These restrictions and term limitations could affect our returns on these facilities, which, in turn, could materially and adversely affect us. As a ground lessee, we are also exposed to the risk of reversion of the property upon expiration of the ground lease term or an earlier breach of the ground lease, which could materially and adversely affect us.
Our use of property-level rent coverages to measure our tenant’s ability to make rent payments may not be accurate.
We evaluate a lease’s property-level rent coverage ratio. Our calculations of rent coverage ratios are unaudited and are based on financial information provided to us by our tenants without independent verification on our part, and we must assume the appropriateness of estimates and judgments that were made by the party preparing the financial information. Our review of rent coverages may not adequately assess the risk of an investment, and, if our calculations are not accurate, we may be unaware that we have tenants that may be unable to make payments under their leases. If our assessment is inaccurate, our revenues could be materially and adversely affected.
Terrorist attacks, acts of violence or war, political protests and unrest or public health crises have affected and may affect the markets in which we operate and have a material adverse effect on us.
Terrorist attacks, acts of violence or war, political protests and unrest or public health crises (including the COVID-19 pandemic) have negatively affected, and may continue to negatively affect, our operations and our stockholders’ investments. We have acquired, and may continue to acquire, real estate assets located in areas that are susceptible to terrorist attacks, acts of violence or war, political protests or public health crises. These events may directly impact the value of our assets through damage, destruction, loss or increased security costs. Although we may obtain insurance to mitigate such risks, we may not be able to obtain sufficient coverage to fund any losses we may incur. Further, certain losses resulting from these types of events are uninsurable or not insurable at reasonable costs. In addition, other than any reserves we may establish, we have no source of funding to repair or reconstruct any uninsured damaged property, and we cannot assure our stockholders that any such sources of funding will be available to us for such purposes in the future. Also, to the extent we must pay unexpectedly large amounts for uninsured losses, our cash flows could be impaired in a manner that would result in little or no cash being distributed to our stockholders. More generally, any terrorist attack, other act of violence or war, political protest and unrest or public health crisis could result in increased volatility in, or damage to, the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy, all of which could adversely affect our tenants’ ability to pay rent on their leases with us, our operators’ ability to manage our properties efficiently and effectively and our ability to borrow money or issue capital stock on favorable terms, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our business, tenants, residents and operators may face litigation and experience rising liability and insurance costs, which may materially and adversely affect us.
With respect to our SHOP and integrated senior health campuses, we are ultimately responsible for operational risks and other liabilities of the facility, other than those arising out of certain actions by our operator, such as gross negligence or willful misconduct. As such, operational risks include, and our resulting revenues therefore depend on, the availability and cost of general and professional liability insurance coverage or increases in insurance policy deductibles.
Inaccuracies in our underwriting assumptions and/or delays in the selection, acquisition, expansion or development of real properties may materially and adversely affect us.
Inaccuracies in our underwriting assumptions and/or delays we encounter in the selection, acquisition, expansion and development of real properties could materially and adversely affect us. In deciding whether to acquire, expand or develop a particular property, we make assumptions regarding the expected future performance of that property. In particular, we estimate the return on our investment based on expected construction costs, lease up velocity, occupancy, rental rates, operating expenses, capital costs and future competition. If our financial projections with respect to a new property are inaccurate, the property may fail to perform as we expected in analyzing our investment. Our development/expansion and construction projects are vulnerable to the impact of material shortages and inflation. For example, shortages and fluctuations in the price of lumber or in other important raw materials could result in delays in the start or completion of, or increase the cost of, developing one or more of our projects. Pricing for labor and raw materials can be affected by various national, regional, local, economic and political factors, including changes to immigration laws that impact the availability of labor or tariffs on imported construction materials.
In connection with our development, expansion and related construction activities, we may be unable to obtain, or suffer delays in obtaining, necessary zoning, land-use, building, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations, or satisfactory tax rates, incentives or abatements. Operators of new facilities we construct may need to obtain Medicare and Medicaid certification and enter into Medicare and Medicaid provider agreements and/or third-party payor contracts. In the event that the operator is unable to obtain the necessary licensure, certification, provider agreements or contracts after the completion of construction, there is a risk that we will not be able to earn any revenues on the facility until either the initial operator obtains a license or certification to operate the new facility and the necessary provider agreements or contracts or we find and contract with a new operator that is able to obtain a license to operate the facility for its intended use and the necessary provider agreements or contracts.
One of our growth strategies is to develop new and expand existing clinical healthcare real estate; we may do this directly or indirectly through joint ventures, including through Trilogy. Expanding and, in particular, developing properties exposes us to increased risks beyond those associated with investing in stabilized, cash flowing real estate. For example, actual costs could significantly exceed estimates (particularly during periods of rapid inflation), construction and stabilization (i.e., substantial lease-up) could take longer than expected, and occupancy and/or rental rates could prove to be lower than expected or property operating expenses could be higher. Any of these events could materially reduce any returns we achieve, or result in losses, on expansion or development projects. For the developments we have completed to date, the time to stabilization has varied, in some cases significantly, and certain developments have not yet stabilized. There can be no assurance that our current
or any future development or expansion projects will be completed in accordance with our budgeted expectations, that they will achieve our underwritten returns or result in yields on cost similar to those achieved on past investments, that they will be stabilized in accordance with our expectations or at all or that, if stabilization is achieved, such stabilization will be maintained. In addition, development and expansion projects undertaken indirectly through Trilogy are primarily overseen by the Trilogy Manager, and we do not have the same level of day-to-day involvement or control over such projects that we do in a project we undertake directly. Accordingly, with respect to projects undertaken through Trilogy, we rely on the development expertise of the Trilogy Manager.
Where properties are acquired prior to the start of construction or during the early stages of construction or when an existing property is expanded, it will typically take several months to complete construction and lease available space. Development and other construction projects, subject us to uncertainties associated with re-zoning for development, environmental concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups and our builder’s ability to build in conformity with plans, specifications, budgeted costs and timetables. If a builder fails to perform, we may resort to legal action to rescind the purchase or the construction contract or to compel performance. A builder’s performance may also be affected or delayed by conditions beyond the builder’s control. Delays in completion of construction could give tenants the right to terminate preconstruction leases for space at a newly developed project. We may incur additional risks if we make periodic progress payments or other advances to builders prior to completion of construction. These and other such factors can result in increased costs of a project or loss of our investment. In addition, we will be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly constructed projects. We also must rely on rental income and expense projections and estimates of the fair market value of property upon completion of construction when agreeing upon a price at the time we acquire the property. If our projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property, and our return on our investment could suffer or result in a loss.
If we contract with a development company for newly developed property, our earnest money deposit made to the development company may not be fully refunded.
We may acquire one or more properties under development. We anticipate that, if we do acquire properties that are under development, we will be obligated to pay a substantial earnest money deposit at the time of contracting to acquire such properties, and that we will be required to close the purchase of the property upon completion of the development of the property. We may enter into such a contract with the development company even if, at the time we enter into the contract, we have not yet secured sufficient financing to enable us to close the purchase of such property. However, we may not be required to close a purchase from the development company, and may be entitled to a refund of our earnest money, generally in any of the following circumstances depending on the contract:
•the development company fails to complete the development of the property according to contractual requirements;
•all or a specified portion of the pre-leased tenants fail to take possession under their leases for any reason; or
•we are unable to secure sufficient financing to pay the purchase price at closing.
The obligation of the development company to refund our earnest money deposit will be unsecured, and we may not be able to obtain a refund of such earnest money deposit from it under these circumstances since the development company may be an entity without substantial assets or operations.
We may not retain any profits resulting from the sale of our properties or receive such profits in a timely manner, because we may provide financing to the purchaser of such property.
When we decide to sell one of our properties, we may provide financing to the purchasers. When we provide financing to purchasers, we will bear the risk that the purchaser may default on its obligations under the financing, which could negatively impact cash flows from operations. Even in the absence of a purchaser default, the distribution of sale proceeds or their reinvestment in other assets will be delayed until the promissory notes or other property we may accept upon the sale are actually paid, sold, refinanced or otherwise disposed of. In some cases, we may receive initial down payments in cash and other property in the year of sale in an amount less than the selling price, and subsequent payments will be spread over a number of years. Additionally, if any purchaser defaults under a financing arrangement with us, it could negatively impact our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Representations and warranties made by us in connection with sales of our properties may subject us to liability that could materially and adversely affect us.
When we sell a property, we have been required, and may continue to be required, to make representations and warranties regarding the property and other customary items. In the event of a breach of such representations or warranties, the purchaser of the property may have claims for damages against us, rights to indemnification from us or otherwise have remedies against us. In any such case, we may incur liabilities that could materially and adversely affect us.
We face possible liability for environmental cleanup costs and damages for contamination related to properties we acquire, which could materially and adversely affect us.
Because we own and operate real estate, we are subject to various international, U.S. federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations. Under these laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real estate may be liable for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in such property. The costs of removal or remediation could be substantial. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Under such laws, a current owner or operator of property can be held liable for contamination on the property caused by the former owner or operator. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures. Environmental laws provide for sanctions in the event of noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private parties. Certain environmental laws and common law principles could be used to impose liability for release of and exposure to hazardous substances, including the release of asbestos-containing materials into the air, and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real estate for personal injury or property damage associated with exposure to released hazardous substances. In addition, new or more stringent laws or stricter interpretations of existing laws could change the cost of compliance or liabilities and restrictions arising out of such laws. The cost of defending against these claims, complying with environmental regulatory requirements, conducting remediation of any contaminated property, or of paying personal injury claims could be substantial and could materially and adversely affect us. In addition, the presence of hazardous substances on a property or the failure to meet environmental regulatory requirements may materially impair our ability to use, lease or sell a property, or to use the property as collateral for borrowing.
Our current and future properties and our tenants may be unable to compete successfully, which could result in lower rent payments and could materially and adversely affect us.
Our current and future properties often will face competition from nearby properties that provide comparable services. Some of those competing properties are owned by governmental agencies and supported by tax revenues, and others are owned by nonprofit corporations and may be supported to a large extent by endowments and charitable contributions. These types of support are not available to our properties. Operators of competing properties may provide superior services than those provided by our operators, which could reduce the competitiveness of our properties, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Similarly, our OM building and senior housing — leased tenants face competition from other medical practices in nearby hospitals and other medical facilities, and their failure to compete successfully with these other practices could adversely affect their ability to make rental payments to us, which could materially and adversely affect us. Further, from time to time and for reasons beyond our control, referral sources, including physicians and managed care organizations, may change their lists of hospitals or physicians to which they refer patients or that are permitted to participate in the payor program. This could also adversely affect our tenants’ ability to make rental payments to us, which could materially and adversely affect us.
Ownership of property outside the United States may subject us to different or greater risks than those associated with our domestic operations.
International development, ownership and operating activities involve risks that are different from those we face with respect to our domestic development, ownership and operating activities. For example, we have limited investing experience in international markets. As of December 31, 2023, we have investments in the United Kingdom, or the UK, and the Isle of Man that represent 1.4% of our portfolio, based on our aggregate purchase price of real estate investments. If we are unable to successfully manage the risks associated with international expansion and operations, we may be adversely affected.
Additionally, our ownership of properties in the UK and the Isle of Man currently subjects us to fluctuations in the exchange rates between U.S. dollars and the UK Pound Sterling, which may, from time to time, impact our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. Revenues generated from any properties or other real estate-related investments we acquire or ventures we enter into relating to transactions involving assets located in markets outside the United States likely will be denominated in the local currency. Therefore, any investments we make outside the United States will subject us to foreign currency risk due to potential fluctuations in exchange rates between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar, and there can be no
assurance that any attempt to mitigate foreign currency risk through hedging transactions or otherwise will be successful. As a result, changes in exchange rates of any such foreign currency to U.S. dollars may materially and adversely affect us and the book value of our assets. In addition, changes in foreign currency exchange rates used to value a REIT’s foreign assets may be considered changes in the value of the REIT’s assets. These changes may adversely affect our status as a REIT. Further, bank accounts in a foreign currency which are not considered cash or cash equivalents may adversely affect our status as a REIT.
Acquired properties may expose us to unknown liability.
We may acquire properties or invest in joint ventures that own properties subject to liabilities and without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, against the prior owners or other third parties with respect to unknown liabilities. As a result, if a liability were asserted against us based upon ownership of those properties, we might have to pay substantial sums to settle or contest it, which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow. Unknown liabilities with respect to acquired properties might include liabilities for clean-up of undisclosed environmental contamination, claims by tenants, vendors or other persons against the former owners of the properties, liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business, and claims for indemnification by general partners, directors and others indemnified by the former owners of the properties.
Severe weather events, natural disasters and the effects of climate change and regulatory and societal responses thereto could materially and adversely affect us.
Natural disasters and severe weather events, including earthquakes, fires, storms, tornados, floods, hurricanes, snow and freezing temperatures could cause significant damage to our properties and the surrounding environment or area. Climate change is causing such events to become more frequent and increasingly severe in their effects, which could increase the costs to and impact on us and our operators over time. The effects of such events on our properties may include increased operational costs, including energy costs, delays and cost increases in our construction projects, damage to our facilities and periods when impacted facilities may be partially or wholly unoccupied, power outages and reputational damage.
Additionally, we are subject to transition risk from international, governmental and societal responses to climate change that may materially and adversely affect us or our operators, including through shifts in fuel sources leading to short- or long-term increases in energy costs and new and more stringent building codes pertaining to energy efficiency, reduced emissions or weather resistance that may be more costly to comply with, any of which could increase our building costs and our and our operators’ capital expenditures, maintenance and operating costs. Also, we are or may become subject to new laws and market expectations with respect to disclosure requirements, and this may result in additional investments and implementation of new practices and reporting processes, all entailing additional compliance costs and risk. For example, the EU recently adopted the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive that will impose disclosure of the risks and opportunities arising from social and environmental issues and of the impact of companies’ activities on people and the environment. Similarly, the State of California recently passed the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act and the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act that will impose broad climate-related disclosure obligations on companies doing business in California. The SEC has included in its regulatory agenda potential rulemaking on climate change disclosures that, if adopted, could significantly increase compliance burdens and associated regulatory costs and complexity. These and other changes in international, federal, state, or local regulation or in societal expectations could materially and adversely affect us directly or indirectly through the impact on our operators.
Risks Related to Real Estate-Related Investments
Unfavorable real estate market conditions and delays in liquidating defaulted mortgage or mezzanineloan investments may negatively impact mortgage loans in which we have invested and may invest, which could result in losses to us.
The investment in mortgage loans or mortgage-backed securities such investments willwe have made, and may continue to make, involve special risks relating to the particular borrower or issuer of the loans or mortgage-backed securities and we will be at risk of loss on those investments, including losses as a result of defaults on the underlyingour mortgage loans. Additionally, if we invest in the common and preferred stock of both publicly traded and private unaffiliated real estate companies, such equity securities involve a higher degree of risk than debt securities due to a variety of factors, including the fact that such investments are subordinate to creditors and are not secured by the issuer’s property.
Theloan investments. These losses on such real estate-related investments may be caused by many conditions beyond our control, including economic conditions affecting real estate values, tenant defaults and lease expirations, interest rate levels, the financial condition and business outlook of the securities issuer and the other economic and liability risks associated with real estate, includingestate. If we acquire property by foreclosure following defaults under our mortgage loan investments, we will have the economic and liability risks relating to rising interest rates.as the owner described above. We do not know whether the values of the property securing any of our real estate-relatedmortgage loan investments including the value of any real estate-related equity securities, will remain at the levels existing on the dates we initially make the related investment. If the values of the underlying properties drop, our risk will increase and the values of our interests may decrease. Furthermore, if there are defaults under our mortgage loan investments, we may not be able to foreclose on or obtain a suitable remedy with respect to such investments. Specifically, we may not be able to repossess and sell the underlying properties quickly, which could reduce the value of our investment. For example, an action to foreclose on a property securing a mortgage loan is regulated by state statutes and rules and is subject to many of the delays and expenses of lawsuits if the defendant raises defenses or counterclaims. Additionally, in the event of
default by a mortgagor, these restrictions, among other things, may impede our ability to foreclose on or sell the mortgaged property or to obtain proceeds sufficient to repay all amounts due to us on the mortgage loan.
The commercial mortgage-backed securities in which we have invested, and may continue to invest, are subject to several types of risks.
Commercial mortgage-backed securities are securities which evidence interests in, or are secured by, a single commercial mortgage loan or a pool of commercial mortgage loans. Accordingly, the commercial mortgage-backed securities in which we have invested, and may continue to invest, are subject to all the risks of the underlying mortgage loans.
In a rising interest rate environment like the one that has prevailed in recent years, the value of commercial mortgage-backed securities may be adversely affected when payments on underlying mortgages loan(s) do not occur as anticipated, resulting in the extension of the security’s effective maturity and the related increase in interest rate sensitivity of a longer-term instrument. The value of commercial mortgage-backed securities may also change due to shifts in the market’s perception of securitization sponsors and borrower sponsors and regulatory or tax changes adversely affecting the mortgage securities markets as a whole. In addition, commercial mortgage-backed securities are subject to the credit risk associated with the performance of the underlying mortgage properties.
Commercial mortgage-backed securities are also subject to several risks created through the securitization structuring process. Subordinate commercial mortgage-backed securities are paid to the extent that there are funds available to make payments. To the extent the collateral pool includes a large percentage of delinquent loans, there is a risk that payments on subordinate commercial mortgage-backed securities will not be fully paid. In addition, commercial mortgage-backed securities are also subject to greater credit risk than those commercial mortgage-backed securities of the same series that are more highly rated.
The mezzanine loans in which we have invested in the past, and may continue to invest, involve greater risks of loss than senior loans secured by income-producing real estate.
We have in the past, and may in the future, invest in mezzanine loans that take the form of subordinated loans secured by second mortgages on the underlying real estate or loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of either the entity owning the real estate or the entity that owns the interest in the entity owning the real estate. These types of investments involve a higher degree of risk than long-term senior mortgage lending secured by income-producing real estate because the investment may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of such entity or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our loan or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment. In addition, mezzanine loans may have higher loan-to-value ratios than conventional mortgage loans, resulting in less equity in the real estate and increasing the risk of loss of principal.
We expect a portion of our real estate-related investments to be illiquid, and we may decrease.not be able to adjust our portfolio in a timely manner in response to changes in economic and other conditions.
We may acquire real estate-related investments in connection with privately negotiated transactions which are not registered under the relevant securities laws, resulting in a prohibition against their transfer, sale, pledge or other disposition except in a transaction that is exempt from the registration requirements of, or is otherwise not subject to, those laws. As a result, our ability to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions may be relatively limited. The mezzanine and bridge loans we may purchase will be particularly illiquid investments due to their short life, their unsuitability for securitization and the greater difficulty of recoupment in the event of a borrower’s default.
Bridge loans involve a greater risk of loss than traditional investment-grade mortgage loans with fully insured borrowers.
We have in the past, and may in the future, acquire bridge loans secured by first lien mortgages on a property to borrowers who are typically seeking short-term capital to be used in an acquisition, construction or rehabilitation of a property, or other short-term liquidity needs. The typical borrower under a bridge loan has usually identified an undervalued asset that has been under-managed and/or is located in a recovering market. If the market in which the asset is located fails to recover according to the borrower’s projections, or if the borrower fails to improve the quality of the asset’s management and/or the value of the asset, the borrower may not receive a sufficient return on the asset to satisfy the bridge loan, and we bear the risk that we may not recover some or all of our initial expenditure.
In addition, borrowers usually use the proceeds of a conventional mortgage to repay a bridge loan. A bridge loan therefore is subject to the risk of a borrower’s inability to obtain permanent financing to repay the bridge loan. Bridge loans are also subject to risks of borrower defaults, bankruptcies, fraud, losses and special hazard losses that are not covered by standard hazard insurance. In the event of any default under bridge loans held by us, we bear the risk of loss of principal and non-payment of interest and fees to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the mortgage collateral and the principal amount and unpaid interest of the bridge loan. To the extent we suffer such losses with respect to our bridge loans, we may be materially and adversely affected.
If we sell real estate-related investments prior to their maturity, we may be forced to sell those investments on unfavorable terms or at a loss.
Our board may choose to sell certain of our assets from time to time, including our real estate-related investments. If we plan to sell those investments prior to their maturity, we may be forced to do so at undesirable times and on unfavorable terms, which may result in losses. For instance, if we sell mortgage loans at a time when prevailing interest rates are higher than the interest rates of such mortgage loans, we would likely sell such loans at a discount to their stated principal values.
Risks Related to the Healthcare Industry
The healthcare industry is heavily regulated and new laws or regulations, changes to existing laws or regulations, loss of licensure or failure to obtain licensure could result in the inability of our tenants to make rent payments to us or adversely affect our operators’ ability to operate facilities held in RIDEA structures.
The healthcare industry is heavily regulated by federal, state and local governmental bodies. The tenants and operators of our healthcare facilities generally will be subject to laws and regulations covering, among other things, licensure, certification for participation in government programs and relationships with physicians and other referral sources. Changes in these laws and regulations, or a tenant’s or operator’s failure to comply with these laws and regulations, could adversely affect us. For example, such non-compliance could materially and adversely affect a tenant’s ability to make rent payments to us. Similarly, were an operator of a facility held in a RIDEA structure (where we benefit from positive operating performance, if any, at such facilities) to fail to comply with a regulatory obligation, it could adversely affect the operating performance of the facility and our participation therein.
Many of our healthcare facilities and their tenants and operators require a license or CON. Failure to obtain a license or CON, or the loss of a required license or CON, would prevent a facility from operating in the manner intended by the tenant or operator. These events could materially and adversely affect a tenant’s ability to make rent payments to us or for an operator to operate a facility held in a RIDEA structure efficiently, either of which could have a material adverse effect on us. Similarly, state and local laws also may regulate expansion, including the addition of new beds/units or services or the acquisition of medical equipment at a facility, and the construction of healthcare-related facilities, by requiring a CON or other similar approval. State CON laws and other similar laws are not uniform throughout the United States and are subject to change. Restrictions on the expansion of our facilities could materially and adversely affect a tenant’s ability to make rent payments to us or for an operator to operate a facility held in a RIDEA structure efficiently, either of which could have a material adverse effect on us. We cannot predict the impact of state CON laws or similar laws on our development or expansion of facilities or the operations of our tenants or operators.
In addition, in certain areas, state CON laws materially limit the ability of competitors to enter into the markets served by our facilities, thereby limiting competition. The repeal of CON laws could allow competitors to freely operate in previously closed markets. Any such increased competition could materially and adversely affect a tenant’s ability to make rent payments to us or for an operator to operate a facility held in a RIDEA structure efficiently, either of which could have a material adverse effect on us. These CON laws could also restrict our ability to expand in new markets.
In certain circumstances, loss of state licensure or certification or closure of a facility could ultimately result in loss of authority to operate the facility or provide services at the facility and require new CON authorization licensure and/or authorization or potential authorization from CMS to re-institute operations. As a result, the value of the facility may be reduced, which could materially and adversely affect us.
Reimbursement rates from third-party payors, including Medicare and Medicaid, that do not rise as quickly, or at all, compared to the rate of inflation, could adversely affect our tenants’ operations and ability to make rental payments to us or our profitability from operating facilities held in RIDEA structures.
Sources of revenue for our tenants and operators may include the federal Medicare program, state Medicaid programs, private insurance carriers and health maintenance organizations, among others. Efforts by such payors to reduce healthcare costs will likely continue, which may result in the slower growth in reimbursement rates for certain services provided by some of our tenants and operators, which could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, the healthcare billing rules and regulations are complex, and the failure of any of our tenants or operators to comply with various laws and regulations could jeopardize their ability to continue participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and other government sponsored payment programs. Moreover, the state and federal governmental healthcare payment programs are subject to state and federal legislative actions, and changes in reimbursement models may reduce our tenants’ and operators’ revenues and adversely affect our tenants’ ability to make rent payments to us or our operators’ ability to operate facilities held in RIDEA structures efficiently, either of which could have a material adverse effect on us.
The healthcare industry continues to face various challenges, including increased government and private payor pressure on healthcare providers to control or reduce costs. It is possible that our tenants and operators will continue to experience a shift in payor mix away from fee-for-service payors, resulting in an increase in the percentage of revenues attributable to reimbursement based upon value-based principles and quality driven managed care programs, and general industry trends that include pressures to control healthcare costs. Pressures to control healthcare costs and a shift away from traditional health insurance reimbursement based upon a fee for service payment to payment based upon quality outcomes have increased the uncertainty of payments.
In addition, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, or the Healthcare Reform Act, was passed with an intent to reduce the number of individuals in the United States without health insurance and effect significant other changes to the ways in which healthcare is organized, delivered and reimbursed. Included within the legislation is a limitation on physician-owned hospitals from expanding facility capacity, unless the facility satisfies very narrow federal exceptions to this limitation. Therefore, if our tenants are physicians that own and refer to a hospital, the hospital may be limited in its operations and expansion potential, which may limit the hospital’s services and resulting revenues and may impact the owner’s ability to make rental payments.
Furthermore, the Healthcare Reform Act included new payment models with new shared savings programs and demonstration programs that include bundled payment models and payments contingent upon reporting on satisfaction of quality benchmarks. The new payment models will likely change how physicians are paid for services. These changes could negatively affect some of our tenants and operators, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, was signed into law and repealed the individual mandate financial penalty portion of the Healthcare Reform Act beginning in 2019. With the elimination of the individual mandate enforcement mechanism, several states brought suit seeking to invalidate the entire Healthcare Reform Act. On June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed this lawsuit without specifically ruling on the constitutionality of the law. In addition, President Biden issued an executive order initiating a special enrollment period as a result of the pandemic from February 15, 2021 through August 15, 2021 for purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage through the ACA marketplace. The executive order also instructed federal agencies to review and reconsider their existing policies and rules that limit access to healthcare. However, challenges to the Healthcare Reform Act may continue. If all or a portion of the Healthcare Reform Act, including the individual mandate, is eventually ruled unconstitutional, our tenants and operators may have more patients and residents who do not have insurance coverage, which may adversely impact the tenants’ and operators’ collections and revenues. Additionally, in October 2022, the Biden Administration announced new actions by CMS to strengthen accountability for nursing homes participating in the Special Focus Facilities, or SFF, an oversight program designed to monitor poor-performing nursing homes. These reforms include strengthened penalties for SFF nursing homes that fail to improve, increases in safety standards that SFF nursing homes must implement and increased communication between CMS and SFF nursing homes. The announcement further noted that the administration will continue to take administrative action to improve oversight of nursing homes moving forward. The financial impact on our tenants and operators could adversely affect a tenant’s ability to make rent payments to us or an operator’s ability to operate facilities held in RIDEA structures efficiently, either of which could have a material adverse effect on us.
In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted since the ACA was enacted. These changes included aggregate reductions to Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year, which went into effect on April 1, 2013, and, due to subsequent legislative amendments to the statute, some of which have changed the 2% amount for specific years or suspended the 2% for specific years, will remain in effect through 2032, unless additional Congressional action is taken. The financial impact on our tenants and operators could adversely affect a tenant’s ability to make rent payments to us or an operator’s ability to operate facilities efficiently, either of which could have a material adverse effect on us.
We cannot predict the ultimate content, timing or effect of any further healthcare reform legislation or the impact of potential legislation on us. We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare services, which may adversely impact our tenants’ ability to make rental payments to us or our operators’ ability to operate facilities held in RIDEA structures efficiently, either of, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
If seniors delay moving to senior housing facilities until they require greater care or forgo moving to senior housing facilities altogether, such action could have a material adverse effect on us.
Some seniors have been delaying their moves to senior housing facilities, including to our triple-net leased properties and SHOP, until they require greater care and are increasingly forgoing moving to senior housing facilities altogether. Further, rehabilitation therapy and other services that have become available to seniors as alternative options on an outpatient basis or in seniors’ personal residences in response to market demand and government regulation may increase the trend for seniors to delay moving to senior housing facilities. Such delays may cause decreases in occupancy rates and increases in resident turnover rates at our senior housing facilities. Moreover, seniors may have greater care needs and require higher acuity services, which may increase our tenants’ and operators’ cost of business, expose our tenants and operators to additional liability, or result in lost business and shorter stays at our leased and managed senior housing facilities if our tenants and operators are not able to provide the requisite care services or fail to adequately provide those services. These trends may negatively impact the occupancy rates and revenues at our leased and managed senior housing, which could have a material adverse effect on us. Further, if any of our tenants or operators are unable to offset lost revenues from these trends by providing and growing other revenue sources, such as new or increased service offerings to seniors, our senior housing facilities may be unprofitable, we may receive lower returns and rent, and the value of our senior housing facilities may decline.
Events that adversely affect the ability of seniors and their families to afford resident fees at our senior housing facilities could cause our occupancy rates and revenues to decline, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Costs to seniors associated with independent and assisted living services are generally not reimbursable under Medicare, and the scope of services that may be covered by Medicaid varies by state. In many cases, only seniors with income or assets meeting or exceeding the comparable median in the regions where our facilities are located typically will be able to afford to pay the entrance fees and monthly resident fees, and a weak economy, depressed housing market or changes in demographics could adversely affect their continued ability to do so. If our tenants and operators are unable to retain and attract seniors with sufficient income, assets or other resources required to pay the fees associated with independent and assisted living services and other services provided by our tenants and operators at our healthcare facilities, our occupancy rates and revenues could decline, which could, in turn, materially and adversely affect us.
Some tenants and operators of our facilities will be subject to fraud and abuse laws, the violation of which could materially and adversely affect a tenant’s ability to make rent payments to us or an operator’s ability to operate a facility held in a RIDEA structure efficiently, either of which could have a material adverse effect on us.
There are various federal, foreign and state laws prohibiting fraudulent and abusive business practices by healthcare providers who participate in, receive payments from, or are in a position to make referrals in connection with government-sponsored healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. Our contractual arrangements with tenants and operators may also be subject to these fraud and abuse laws, including federal laws such as the Anti-Kickback Statute and the Stark Law. Moreover, our agreements with tenants and operators may be required to satisfy individual state law requirements that vary from state to state, which impacts the terms and conditions that may be negotiated in such agreements.
These federal and foreign laws include:
•the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a criminal law which prohibits, among other things, the offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, in return for, or to induce, the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any item or service for which payment may be made under a federal healthcare program such as Medicare and Medicaid;
•the Federal Physician Self-Referral Prohibition, which, subject to specific exceptions, restricts physicians from making referrals for specifically designated health services for which payment may be made under federal healthcare programs to an entity with which the physician, or an immediate family member, has a financial relationship;
•the False Claims Act, which prohibits any person from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, false or fraudulent claims for payment or approval that are false or fraudulent or making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government, including claims paid by the Medicare and Medicaid programs;
•the Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which authorizes the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services to impose monetary penalties or exclusion from participating in state or federal healthcare programs for certain fraudulent acts;
•the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended, which makes it a federal crime to defraud any health benefit plan, including private payors;
•the Exclusions Law, which authorizes the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services to exclude persons or entities from participating in state or federal healthcare programs for certain fraudulent acts; and
•the UK Bribery Act 2010, a criminal law which relates to any function of a public nature, connected with a business, performed in the course of a person’s employment or performed on behalf of a company or another body of persons, covering bribery both in the public and private sectors.
Each of these laws includes criminal and/or civil penalties for violations that range from punitive sanctions, damage assessments, penalties, imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid payments and/or exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Monetary penalties associated with violations of these laws have been increased in recent years. Certain laws, such as the False Claims Act, allow for individuals to bring whistleblower actions on behalf of the government for violations thereof. Additionally, states in which the facilities are located may have similar fraud and abuse laws. Investigation by a federal or state governmental body for violation of fraud and abuse laws or imposition of any of these penalties upon one of our tenants or operators or a settlement relating to such matters could materially and adversely affect a tenant’s ability to make rent payments to us or an operator’s ability to operate a facility held in a RIDEA structure efficiently, either of which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Efforts to ensure compliance with applicable healthcare laws and regulations may cause our tenants and operators to incur substantial costs that could materially and adversely affect a tenant’s ability to make rent payments to us or an operator’s ability to operate a facility held in a RIDEA structure efficiently, either of which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Adverse trends in healthcare provider operations may materially and adversely affect us.
The healthcare industry is currently experiencing:
•changes in the demand for and methods of delivering healthcare services;
•changes in third-party reimbursement policies;
•significant unused capacity in certain areas, which has created substantial competition for patients among healthcare providers in those areas;
•increased expenses for uninsured patients;
•increased competition among healthcare providers;
•increased liability insurance expenses;
•continued pressure by private and governmental payors to reduce payments to providers of services;
•increased scrutiny of billing, referral and other practices by federal and state authorities;
•changes in federal and state healthcare program payment models;
•increased emphasis on compliance with privacy and security requirements related to personal health information; and
•increased instability in the Health Insurance Exchange market and lack of access to insurance plans participating in the exchange.
Additionally, in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, many governmental entities relaxed certain licensure and other regulatory requirements relating to telemedicine, allowing more patients to virtually access care without having to visit a healthcare facility. Despite the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency, if governmental and regulatory authorities continue to allow for increased virtual healthcare, this may affect the demand for some of our properties, such as OM buildings.
These factors may negatively affect the economic performance of some or all of our tenants and operators, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our tenants and operators may be affected by the financial deterioration, insolvency and/or bankruptcy of other companies in the healthcare industry.
Certain companies in the healthcare industry, including some key senior housing operators, are experiencing considerable financial, legal and/or regulatory difficulties which have resulted or may result in financial deterioration and, in some cases, insolvency and/or bankruptcy. The adverse effects on these companies could have a significant impact on the industry as a whole, including but not limited to negative public perception by investors, lenders, patients and residents. As a result, our tenants and properties managed by our operators could experience the damaging financial effects of a weakened industry sector driven by negative headlines, and we could be materially and adversely affected.
Our tenants and operators may be subject to significant legal and regulatory actions that could subject them to increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our tenants and operators may become subject to claims that their services have resulted in patient injury or other adverse effects. Healthcare providers have experienced an increasing trend in the frequency and severity of professional liability and general liability insurance claims and litigation asserted against them. The insurance coverage maintained by our tenants and operators may not cover all claims made against them nor continue to be available at a reasonable cost, if at all. In some states, insurance coverage for the risk of punitive damages arising from professional liability and general liability claims and/or litigation may not, in certain cases, be available to our tenants and operators due to state law prohibitions or limitations of availability. As a result, tenants and operators of our OM buildings, senior housing, SNFs and other healthcare-related facilities operating in these states may be liable for punitive damage awards that are either not covered or are in excess of their insurance policy limits. We also believe that there has been, and will continue to be, an increase in regulatory or other governmental investigations of certain healthcare providers, particularly in the area of Medicare/Medicaid false claims, as well as an increase in enforcement actions resulting from these investigations. Insurance may not always be available to cover such losses. Any adverse determination or settlement in a legal proceeding or regulatory or other governmental investigation, whether currently asserted or arising in the future, could negatively affect a tenant’s or operator’s business and financial strength. If a tenant or operator is unable to obtain or maintain insurance coverage, if judgments are obtained in excess of the insurance coverage, if uninsured punitive damages are required to be paid, or if an uninsurable government enforcement action is brought, the tenant or operator could be exposed to substantial additional liabilities, which may affect the tenant’s ability to pay rent to us or the operator’s ability to manage our properties efficiently and effectively, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
We, our tenants and our operators for our senior housing facilities and SNFs may be subject to various government reviews, audits and investigations that could materially and adversely affect us, including an obligation to refund amounts previously paid to us, potential criminal charges, the imposition of fines and/or the loss of the right to participate in Medicare and Medicaid programs.
We, our tenants and our operators for our senior housing facilities and SNFs are subject to various governmental reviews, audits and investigations to verify compliance with the Medicaid and Medicare programs and applicable laws and regulations. We, our tenants and our operators for our senior housing facilities and SNFs are also subject to audits under various government programs, including Recovery Audit Contractors, Unified Program Integrity Contractors, and other third party audit programs, in which third-party firms engaged by CMS conduct extensive reviews of claims data and medical and other records to identify potential improper payments under the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Private pay sources also reserve the right to conduct audits. An adverse review, audit or investigation could result in:
•an obligation to refund amounts previously paid to us, our tenants or our operators pursuant to the Medicare or Medicaid programs or from private payors, in amounts that could be material to us;
•state or federal agencies imposing fines, penalties and other sanctions on us, our tenants or our operators;
•loss of our right, our tenants’ right or our operators’ right to participate in the Medicare or Medicaid programs or one or more private payor networks;
•an increase in private litigation against us, our tenants or our operators; and
•damage to our reputation in various markets.
While we, our tenants and our operators for our senior housing facilities and SNFs have always been subject to post-payment audits and reviews, more intensive “probe reviews” appear to be a permanent procedure with our fiscal intermediaries. If the government or a court were to conclude that such errors, deficiencies or disagreements constituted criminal violations or were to conclude that such errors, deficiencies or disagreements resulted in the submission of false claims to federal healthcare programs, or if the government were to discover other problems in addition to the ones identified by the probe reviews that rose to actionable levels, we, our officers and our tenants and operators and their officers might face potential criminal charges and/or civil claims, administrative sanctions and penalties for amounts that could be material to us. In addition, we, our officers and other key personnel and our tenants and operators and their officers and other key personnel could be temporarily or permanently excluded from future participation in state and federal healthcare reimbursement programs such as Medicaid and Medicare. In any event, it is likely that a governmental investigation alone, regardless of its outcome, would divert material time, resources and attention from our management team and our staff or those of our tenants and our operators and could materially and adversely affect us during and after any such investigation or proceedings.
In cases where claim and documentation review by any CMS contractor results in repeated poor performance, a facility can be subjected to protracted oversight. This oversight may include repeat education and re-probe, extended pre-payment review, referral to recovery audit or integrity contractors, or extrapolation of an error rate to other reimbursement outside of specifically reviewed claims. Sustained failure to demonstrate improvement towards meeting all claim filing and documentation requirements could ultimately lead to Medicare and Medicaid decertification, which materially and adversely affects us. Adverse actions by CMS may also cause third-party payor or licensure authorities to audit our tenants or operators. These additional audits could result in termination of third-party payor agreements or licensure of the facility, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
In addition, our tenants and operators that accepted relief funds distributed to combat the adverse effects of COVID-19 and reimburse providers for unreimbursed expenses and lost revenues may be subject to certain reporting and auditing obligations associated with the receipt of such relief funds. If these tenants or operators fail to comply with the terms and conditions associated with relief funds, they may be subject to government recovery and enforcement actions. Furthermore, regulatory guidance relating to use of the relief funds, recordkeeping requirements and other terms and conditions continues to evolve and there is a high degree of uncertainty surrounding many aspects of the relief funds. This uncertainty may create compliance challenges for tenants and operators who accepted relief funds.
The Healthcare Reform Act and similar foreign laws impose additional requirements regarding compliance and disclosure.
The Healthcare Reform Act requires SNFs to have a compliance and ethics program that is effective in preventing and detecting criminal, civil and administrative violations and in promoting quality of care as a condition of participation in Medicare and Medicaid. If our operators fall short in their compliance and ethics programs and quality assurance and performance improvement programs, if and when required, their reputations and ability to attract patients and residents could be adversely affected, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Similar requirements also apply to healthcare properties in the UK under national law and guidance. The Health & Care Professions Council, the regulator of health, psychological and care professionals in the UK, requires a qualification to demonstrate standards of proficiency and also set standards, hold a register, quality assure education and investigate complaints. They have set out an ethical framework with standards of conduct, performance and ethics including restrictions on confidentiality and the use of social media. If any of our operators in the UK fall short in their obligations, their reputations and ability to attract patients and residents may be adversely affect which might have a material adverse effect on their business and by extension us.
Risks Related to Joint Ventures
Property ownership through joint ventures could limit our control of those investments andor our decisions with respect to other investments, restrict our ability to operate the propertyand finance properties on our term.terms and reduce their expected return.
In connection with the purchase of real estate, we have entered, and may continue to enter, into joint ventures with third parties, including affiliates of our advisor.parties. We may also purchase or develop properties in co-ownership arrangements with the property sellers, of the properties, developers or other persons.parties. We may own operating properties through both consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. These structures involve participation in the investment by other parties whose interests and rights may not be the same as ours. Our joint ventures, and joint ventures we may enter into in the future, may involve risks not present with respect to our wholly ownedwholly-owned properties, including the following:
•we may share with, or even delegate decision-making authority withto, our joint venture partners regarding certain major decisions affecting the ownership or operation of the joint venture and the joint venture property, such as, but not limited to, (i) additional capital contribution requirements, (ii) obtaining, refinancing or paying off debt and (iii) obtaining consent prior to the sale or transfer of our interest in the joint venture to a third party, which may prevent us from taking actions that are opposed by our joint venture partners;
•our joint venture partners might become bankrupt and such proceedings could have an adverse impact on the operationoperations of the partnershipjoint venture;
•our joint venture partners may have business interests or goals with respect to the joint venture property that conflict with our business interests and goals, which could increase the likelihood of disputes regarding the ownership, management or disposition of the property;
•in some instances, we may enter into arrangements with our joint venture partners that may (i) require an acquisition opportunity to be allocated to the joint venture when we otherwise may have acquired the asset ourselves or (ii) cause the joint venture to sell an asset at a time when we otherwise may not have initiated such a transaction;
•disputes may develop with our joint venture partners over decisions affecting the joint venture property or the joint venture, which may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and distract our officers from focusing their time and effort on our business, disrupt the day-to-day operations of the property, such as by delaying the implementation of important decisions until the conflict is resolved, have an adverse impact on the operations and profitability of the joint venture and possibly force a sale of the property if the dispute cannot be resolved;
•our joint venture partners may be unable to or refuse to make capital contributions when due, or otherwise fail to meet their obligations, which could require us to fund the shortfall or forego our equity in the joint venture; and
•the activities of a joint venture could adversely affect our ability to maintain our qualification as a REIT.
As of December 31, 2023, we indirectly own a 74.1% interest in Trilogy, a consolidated joint venture representing approximately 43.6% of our portfolio (based on aggregate contract purchase price) and contributing approximately 51.0% of our annualized base rent / annualized NOI as of such date. Approximately 23.4% of Trilogy is indirectly owned by NHI, with the remaining 2.5% primarily owned by affiliates of the Trilogy Manager, an eligible independent contractor, or EIK, that manages the day-to-day operations of the joint venture. In addition to relying on the Trilogy Manager to manage the joint venture effectively, our investment in Trilogy exposes us to many of the risks described above with respect to joint venture investments generally. For example, other parties with interests in Trilogy have certain rights that could affect our investment in Trilogy. There are certain decisions that are deemed “major decisions” with respect to Trilogy’s business (such as terminating the management agreement with the Trilogy Manager, taking certain actions under the management agreement, making certain sales of the Trilogy properties, and taking certain other actions with respect to the Trilogy portfolio) that require the approval of NorthStar. It is possible that NorthStar will have interests that differ from ours, and our ability to pursue our interests may be limited by their rights under the joint venture arrangements. Additionally, if we seek to transfer our indirect ownership interests in Trilogy, we are required to first offer such interests to NorthStar, which could delay our ability to sell such interests or adversely affect the price we receive in connection with a sale. In addition, in certain circumstances, we and NorthStar have the right to force the sale of all of Trilogy’s assets, provided that, if this right is triggered by a party, the non-triggering party has a right to elect to purchase the Trilogy assets. This could cause us to increase our investment in Trilogy or result in the sale of Trilogy at a time when we would not to choose to effect a sale.
We have the option to purchase the remaining 24.0% minority membership interest held by our joint venture partner in Trilogy REIT Holdings. Many factors, such as the historical and projected performance of the assets held by Trilogy REIT Holdings, our expectations for the future performance of the assets held by Trilogy REIT Holdings, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and our access to attractive capital, among other factors, will influence whether or not we elect to exercise this option, the consideration mix we would select in connection with any such exercise and how we would finance the cash portion of the purchase price for any such exercise. Accordingly, no assurance can be given as to when, or if, we will exercise this option, or, if we do exercise this option, that we will consummate the purchase on the terms we expect or at all or that we will achieve the anticipated benefit from acquiring the remaining 24.0% minority membership interest held by our joint venture partner in Trilogy REIT Holdings.
We may structure our joint venture relationships in a manner which may limitlimits the amount we participate in the cash flows or appreciation of an investment.
We have entered, and may continue to enter, into joint venture agreements, the economic terms of which may provide for the distribution of income to us otherwise than in direct proportion to our ownership interest in the joint venture. For example, while we and a co-ventureranother joint venture party may invest an equal amount of capital in an investment, the investment may be structured such that we haveone joint venture partner has a right to priority distributions of cash flows up to a certain target return while the co-ventureranother joint venture partner may receive a disproportionately greater share of cash flows than we are to receive once such target return has been achieved. This type of
investment structure may result in the co-venturerour joint venture partner receiving more of the cash flows, including any from appreciation, of an investment than we would receive. If we do not accurately judge the appreciation prospects of a particular investment or structure the venture appropriately, we may incur losses on joint venture investments or have limited participation in the profits of a joint venture investment, either of which could reduce our ability to pay cashmake distributions to our stockholders.
Federal Income Tax If we serve as a managing member, general partner or controlling party with respect to investments or joint ventures, we may be subject to risks and liabilities that we would not otherwise face.
In certain circumstances, we may serve as managing member, general partner or controlling party with respect to investments and joint ventures. In such instances, we may face additional risks including, among others, the following:
•we may have increased duties to the other investors or partners in the investment or venture;
•in the event of certain events or conflicts, our partners may have recourse against us, including the right to monetary penalties, the ability to force a sale or exit the investment or venture;
•our partners may have the right to remove us as the general partner or managing member in certain cases involving cause; and
•our subsidiaries that would be the general partner or managing member of the investment or venture could be generally liable, under applicable law or the governing agreement of a venture, for the debts and obligations of the investment or venture, subject to certain exculpation and indemnification rights pursuant to the terms of the governing agreement.
Risks Related to Debt Financing
We have substantial indebtedness and may incur additional indebtedness in the future, which could materially and adversely affect us.
We have substantial indebtedness and may incur additional indebtedness in the future, which could materially and adversely affect us.As of December 31, 2023, we had indebtedness of $2,551,036,000, which comprises $914,900,000 in unsecured debt under our 2022 Credit Agreement and $1,636,136,000 in secured mortgage loans payable and under the secured 2019 Trilogy Credit Agreement. As of December 31, 2023, we had $268,722,000 of total liquidity, comprised of $225,277,000 of undrawn capacity under our lines of credit and $43,445,000 of cash and cash equivalents. This represented approximately 5.7% of the combined fair market value of all of our properties and other real estate-related investments as of December 31, 2023.Though we anticipate that our overall leverage will approximate 50.0% of the combined fair market value of all of our properties and other real estate-related investments, as determined at the end of each calendar year, our organizational documents do not place a limitation on the amount of leverage that we may incur, and we could incur leverage substantially in excess of this amount.
We expect to fund a portion of our cash needs, including funding investment activity, with additional indebtedness. If we exercise our option to purchase the remaining 24.0% minority membership interest held by our joint venture partner in Trilogy REIT Holdings, we may consummate the purchase transaction entirely in cash or in a combination of at least the Minimum Cash Consideration and newly issued shares of our convertible preferred stock as defined in Note 13, Equity — Noncontrolling Interests in Total Equity — Membership Interest in Trilogy REIT Holdings, or Convertible Preferred Stock. If we elect to pay
for the purchase entirely in cash, the all cash purchase price would be $240,500,000 if we consummate the purchase on or before March 31, 2024, would increase to $247,000,000 if we consummate the purchase from April 1, 2024 to and including December 31, 2024 and would further increase to $260,000,000 if we consummate the purchase on or after January 1, 2025. If, for example, we elect to pay for the purchase using only the Minimum Cash Consideration, we would pay for the remaining portion of the purchase price consideration by issuing to NorthStar 9,360,000 shares of our Convertible Preferred Stock. In all cases, an amount of cash will be required, and we may source our cash need from the proceeds of issuances of additional debt and equity (including preferred stock other than our Convertible Preferred Stock) and/or a hybrid of debt and equity.
Also, if we exercise our option and elect to issue shares of our Convertible Preferred Stock, we would not be permitted to pay cash dividends on junior securities (such as our common stock) unless we were then current on all accumulated dividends owed on our Convertible Preferred Stock for past quarterly dividend periods. This means that we may have additional cash needs so long as our Convertible Preferred Stock is outstanding. We may also have cash needs in order to satisfy the redemption option that a holder of shares of our Convertible Preferred Stock may exercise after a fundamental change transaction (such as a change-in-control transaction involving us), which exercise would require us to repurchase that holder’s shares of our Convertible Preferred Stock or to exercise our option to redeem our Convertible Preferred Stock if financially advantageous to do so. As such, the credit rating agencies and our investors may view our Convertible Preferred Stock as effectively similar to debt or “mezzanine” financing. Our ability to access additional debt capital and the cost of other terms thereof will be significantly influenced by our creditworthiness and any rating assigned by a rating agency, as well as by general economic and market conditions. Significant secured and unsecured indebtedness adversely affects our creditworthiness and could prevent us fromachieving an investment grade credit rating or cause a rating agency to lower a rating or to place a rating on a “watchlist” for possible downgrade. Deteriorations in our creditworthiness or in any ratings that we may achieve, or the perception that any such deterioration may occur, would adversely affect our ability to access additional debt capital and increase the cost of any debt capital that is available to us and may require us to accept restrictive covenants. A reduction in our access to debt capital, an increase in the cost thereof or our acceptance of restrictive covenants could limit our ability to achieve our business objectives and pursue our growth strategies.
Additionally, interest rates have significantly increased, and may continue to significantly increase, our interest costs. Expensive debt could reduce or limit our available cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and development projects, reduce cash available for distributions to stockholders, hinder our ability to meet certain debt service ratios under our credit agreements or impose restrictions on our ability to incur additional debt for so long as certain debt service ratios are not met.
We may also incur mortgage debt and other property-level debt on properties that we already own in order to obtain funds to acquire additional properties or make other capital investments. In addition, we may borrow as necessary or advisable to ensure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, including borrowings to satisfy the REIT requirement that we distribute at least 90.0% of our annual REIT taxable income to our stockholders. However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain any such borrowings on favorable terms or at all.
If we mortgage a property and there is a shortfall between the cash flows from that property and the cash flows needed to service mortgage debt on that property, our financial results would be negatively affected, and the amount of cash available for distributions to stockholders would be reduced. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss of a property since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in lenders initiating foreclosure actions. If any mortgages contain cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions, a default on a single property could affect multiple properties. In addition, lenders may have recourse to assets other than those specifically securing the repayment of indebtedness. For tax purposes, a foreclosure on any of our properties will be treated as a disposition of the property, which could cause us to recognize taxable income on foreclosure, without receiving corresponding cash proceeds. We may give full or partial guarantees to lenders of mortgage debt on behalf of the entities that own our properties. When we give a guaranty on behalf of an entity that owns one of our properties, we will be responsible to the lender for satisfaction of the debt if it is not paid by such entity.
A significant amount of debt subjects us to many risks that, if realized, would materially and adversely affect us, including the risk that:
•our cash flow from operating activities could become insufficient to make required payments of principal and interest on our debt, which would likely result in (i) acceleration of the debt (and any other debt containing a cross-default or cross-acceleration provision), increasing the likelihood of further distress if refinancing is not available on favorable terms or at all, (ii) our inability to borrow undrawn amounts under other existing financing arrangements, even if we have timely made all required payments under such arrangements, further compromising our liquidity and/or (iii) the loss of some or all of our assets that are pledged as collateral in connection with our financing arrangements;
•our debt may increase our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions with no assurance that such debt will increase our investment returns in an amount sufficient to offset the associated risks relating to leverage;
•we may be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operating activities to payments on our debt, thereby reducing funds available for operations, future business opportunities, stockholder distributions and/or other purposes; and
•to the extent the maturity of certain debt occurs prior to the maturity of a related asset pledged or transferred as collateral for such debt, we may not be able to refinance that debt on favorable terms or at all, which may reduce available liquidity and/or cause significant losses to us.
To the extent we borrow funds at floating interest rates, we will be adversely affected by rising interest rates unless fully hedged. Rising interest rates will also increase our interest expense on future fixed-rate debt.
Interest we pay on our debt obligations reduces our financial results and cash available for distributions to our stockholders. Whenever we incur variable-rate debt, increases in interest rates would increase our interest expense unless fully hedged. During 2023, we entered into interest rate swap contracts to hedge $750,000,000 of our variable-rate credit facilities. As of December 31, 2023, our outstanding debt aggregated $2,551,036,000, of which 31.8% was unhedged variable-rate debt. Rising interest rates will also increase our interest expense on future fixed-rate debt.If we need to repay existing debt during periods of rising interest rates, which has been the case in recent years , we could be required to sell one or more of our properties at times which may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments, which could result in losses.
To the extent we borrow at fixed rates or enter into fixed interest rate swaps, we will not benefit from reduced interest expense if interest rates decrease.
We are exposed to the effects of interest rate changes primarily as a result of borrowings we have used to maintain liquidity and fund expansion and refinancing of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. To limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings, prepayment penalties and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs while taking into account variable interest rate risk, we have borrowed, and may continue to borrow, at fixed rates or variable rates depending upon prevailing market conditions. We have and may also continue to enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and caps in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. Therefore, to the extent we borrow at fixed rates or enter into fixed interest rate swaps, we will not benefit from reduced interest expense if interest rates decrease in the future below our borrowing rates.
Hedging activity may expose us to risks.
We have used, and may continue to use, derivative financial instruments to hedge our exposure to changes in exchange rates and interest rates. If we use derivative financial instruments to hedge against exchange rate or interest rate fluctuations, we will be exposed to credit risk and legal enforceability risks. In this context, credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. Legal enforceability risks encompass general contractual risks, including the risk that the counterparty will breach the terms of, or fail to perform its obligations under, the derivative contract. These derivative instruments are speculative in nature and there is no guarantee that they will be effective. If we are unable to manage these risks effectively, we could be materially and adversely affected.
Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants that could adversely affect our business.
When providing financing, a lender may impose restrictions on us that affect our ability to incur additional debt, make distributions to our stockholders and operate our business. We have entered into, and may continue to enter into, loan documents that contain covenants that limit our ability to further mortgage the property or discontinue insurance coverage. These or other limitations may adversely affect our flexibility and our ability to achieve our business objectives.
Interest-only indebtedness may increase our risk of default, adversely affect our ability to refinance or sell properties and ultimately may reduce our funds available for distribution to our stockholders.
We may finance or refinance our properties using interest-only mortgage indebtedness. During the interest-only period, the amount of each scheduled payment will be less than that of a traditional amortizing mortgage loan. The principal balance of the mortgage loan will not be reduced (except in the case of prepayments) because there are no scheduled monthly payments of principal during this period. After the interest-only period, we will be required either to make scheduled payments of amortized principal and interest or to make a lump-sum or “balloon” payment at maturity. At the time such a balloon payment is due, we may or may not be able to refinance the balloon payment on terms as favorable as the original loan or sell the particular property at a price sufficient to make the balloon payment. Furthermore, these required principal or balloon payments will
increase the amount of our scheduled payments and may increase our risk of default under the related mortgage loan. If the mortgage loan has an adjustable interest rate, the amount of our scheduled payments would likely increase at a time of rising interest rates, depending upon the adjustment terms. In addition, payments of principal and interest made to service our debt, including balloon payments, may leave us with insufficient cash to pay the distributions to our stockholders, including those that we are required to pay to maintain our qualification as a REIT. Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on us.
Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure and Organization
Our charter imposes a limit on the percentage of shares of our common stock or capital stock that any person may own, and such limit may discourage a takeover or business combination that may have benefited our stockholders.
Our charter restricts the direct or indirect ownership by one person or entity to no more than 9.9% of the value of shares of our then outstanding capital stock (which includes common stock and any preferred stock we may issue) and no more than 9.9% of the value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our then outstanding common stock. This restriction may discourage a change of control of us and may deter individuals or entities from making tender offers for shares of our stock on terms that might be financially attractive to our stockholders or which may cause a change in our management. This ownership restriction may also prohibit business combinations that would have otherwise been approved by our board and our stockholders. In addition to deterring potential transactions that may be favorable to our stockholders, these provisions may also decrease our stockholders’ ability to sell their shares of our common stock.
Our stockholders’ ability to control our operations is severely limited.
Our board determines our major strategies, including our strategies regarding investments, financing, growth, capitalization, REIT qualification and distributions. Our board may amend or revise these and other strategies without a vote of the stockholders. Under our charter and Maryland law, our stockholders have a right to vote only on the following matters:
•the election or removal of directors;
•the amendment of our charter, except that our board may amend our charter without stockholder approval to change our name or the name of other designation or the par value of any class or series of our stock and the aggregate par value of our stock, increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have the authority to issue, or effect certain reverse stock splits;
•our dissolution; and
•certain mergers, consolidations, conversions, statutory share exchanges and sales or other dispositions of all or substantially all of our assets.
All other matters are subject to the sole discretion of our board.
Conflicts of interest could arise as a result of our officers’ other positions and/or interests outside of our company.
We rely on our management for implementation of our policies and our day-to-day operations. Although a majority of their business time is spent working for our company, they may engage in other investment and business activities in which we have no economic interest. Their responsibilities to these other entities could result in action or inaction that is detrimental to our business, which could harm the implementation of our growth strategies and achievement of our business strategies. They may face conflicts of interest in allocating time among us and their other business ventures and in meeting obligations to us and those other entities.
Certain provisions of Maryland law may make it more difficult for us to be acquired and may limit or delay our stockholders’ ability to dispose of their shares of our common stock.
Certain provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, or MGCL, such as the business combination statute and the control share acquisition statute, are designed to prevent, or have the effect of preventing, someone from acquiring control of us. The MGCL prohibits “business combinations” between a Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder or an affiliate of an interested stockholder. An “interested stockholder” is defined generally as:
•any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 10.0% or more of the voting power of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock; or
•an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was an interested stockholder.
These prohibitions last for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder. Thereafter, any business combination with the interested stockholder or an affiliate of the interested stockholder must be recommended by the corporation’s board and approved by the affirmative vote of at least 80.0% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding shares of voting stock of the corporation and two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting stock of the corporation other than shares held by the interested stockholder. These requirements could have the effect of inhibiting a change in control even if a change in control were in the best interests of our stockholders.
The control share acquisition statute of the MGCL provides that, subject to certain exceptions, holders of “control shares” of a Maryland corporation (defined as voting shares of stock that, if aggregated with all other such shares of stock owned by the acquiror or in respect of which the acquiror can exercise or direct voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would entitle the acquiror to exercise voting power in electing directors within specified ranges of voting power) acquired in a “control share acquisition” (defined as the acquisition of issued and outstanding control shares) have no voting rights except to the extent approved by our stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Shares of stock owned by the acquiror, by our officers or by our employees who are also our directors are excluded from shares entitled to vote on the matter.
Pursuant to the MGCL, our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the control share acquisition provisions of the MGCL any and all acquisitions by any person of shares of our stock, which eliminates voting rights for certain levels of shares that could exercise control over us, and our board has adopted a resolution providing that any business combination between us and any other person is exempted from the business combination statute, provided that such business combination is first approved by our board. However, if the bylaws provision exempting us from the control share acquisition statute or our board resolution opting out of the business combination statute were repealed in whole or in part at any time, these provisions of the MGCL could delay or prevent offers to acquire us and increase the difficulty of consummating any such offers, even if such a transaction would be in the best interests of our stockholders.
The MGCL and our organizational documents limit our stockholders’ right to bring claims against our officers and directors.
The MGCL provides that a director has no liability in such capacity if he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in the corporation’s best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. Our charter requires us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, to indemnify and advance expenses to our directors and officers and our subsidiaries’ directors and officers. Additionally, our charter limits, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, the liability of our directors and officers to us and our stockholders for monetary damages. Moreover, we have entered into separate indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers and intend to enter into indemnification agreements with each of our future directors and executive officers. Although our charter does not limit the liability of our directors and officers or allow us to indemnify our directors and officers to a greater extent than permitted under Maryland law, we and our stockholders may have more limited rights against our directors and officers than might otherwise exist under common law, which could reduce our stockholders’ and our recovery against them. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by our directors and officers in some cases, which would decrease the cash otherwise available for distribution to our stockholders.
Our structure may result in potential conflicts of interest with limited partners in our operating partnership whose interests may not be aligned with those of our stockholders.
Our directors and officers have duties to us and our stockholders under Maryland law and our charter in connection with their management of us. At the same time, the general partner of our operating partnership, of which we are the sole owner, has fiduciary duties under Delaware law to our operating partnership and to the limited partners in connection with the management of our operating partnership. The duties of the general partner to our operating partnership and its partners may come into conflict with the duties of our directors and officers to us and our stockholders. Under Delaware law, a general partner of a Delaware limited partnership owes its limited partners the duties of good faith and fair dealing. Other duties, including fiduciary duties, may be modified or eliminated in the partnership agreement. If there is a conflict in the fiduciary duties owed by us (as the sole member of the general partner) to our stockholders on one hand and by the general partner to any limited partners on the other, we shall be entitled to resolve such conflict in favor of our stockholders.
Additionally, the partnership agreement expressly limits our liability by providing that we and our officers, directors, stockholders, trustees, representatives, agents and employees will not be liable or accountable to our operating partnership for (i) any act or omission performed or failed to be performed, or for any losses, claims, costs, damages, or liabilities arising from any such act or omission, (ii) any tax liability imposed on our operating partnership or (iii) any losses due to the misconduct, negligence (gross or ordinary), dishonesty or bad faith of any agents of our operating partnership, if we or any such person acted consistent with the obligation of good faith and fair dealing and with applicable duties of care and loyalty. In addition, our operating partnership is required to indemnify us and our officers, directors, employees and designees to the extent permitted by
applicable law from and against any and all claims arising from operations of our operating partnership, unless it is established that: (i) the act or omission was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and either was committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty; (ii) the indemnified party received an improper personal benefit, in money, property or services; or (iii) in the case of a criminal proceeding, the indemnified person had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. The provisions of Delaware law that allow the fiduciary duties of a general partner to be modified by a partnership agreement have not been tested in a court of law, and we have not obtained an opinion of counsel covering the provisions set forth in the partnership agreement that purport to waive or restrict our fiduciary duties.
Risks Related to Taxes and Our REIT Status
Failure to maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes would subject us to U.S. federal income tax on our REIT taxable income at the regular corporate rates,rate, which would substantially increase our income tax expenses and reduce our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
We qualified andhave elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code beginningcommencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2016. We believe that we have been, and, through the time of the REIT Merger, GAHR III was, organized and operated, and we intend to continue to operate in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code. To continue to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we, and our subsidiary REIT, Trilogy Real Estate Investment Trust, or Trilogy REIT, must meet various requirements set forth in the Code concerning, among other things, the ownership of our, or Trilogy REIT’s, outstanding common stock, the nature of our, or Trilogy REIT’s, assets, the sources of our, or Trilogy REIT’s, income, and the amount of our, or Trilogy REIT’s, distributions to our stockholders. In addition, if it is determined that GAHR III lost, in any year prior to the REIT Merger, its qualification as a REIT without being entitled to any relief under the statutory provisions to preserve REIT status, we, as a “successor” to GAHR III under the REIT rules, will not be able to qualify as a REIT to the extent we are unable to avail ourselves of any relief under the statutory provisions to preserve REIT status. The REIT qualification requirements are extremely complex, and interpretations of the U.S. federal income tax laws governing qualification as a REIT are limited. In addition, the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control may affect our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that we, or Trilogy REIT, will be successful in operating soin compliance with the REIT rules in such manner as to allow us to maintain our qualification as a REIT. At any time, new laws, interpretations or court decisions may change the U.S. federal tax laws relating to, or the U.S. federal income tax consequences of, qualification as a REIT. It is possible that future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause our board to determine that it is not in our best interestinterests to maintain our qualification as a REIT, and to revoke our REIT election, which it may do without stockholder approval.
If we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT for any taxable year, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our REIT taxable income at the corporate rates.rate and could also be subject to increased state and local taxes. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year of losing our REIT status unless the Internal Revenue Services, or IRS, grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Losing our REIT status would reduce our net earnings available for investment orand amounts available for distribution to our stockholders because of the additional tax liability. In addition, distributions would no longer qualify for the distributions paid deduction, and we would no longer be required to pay distributions.make distributions to our stockholders. If this occurs, we might be required to borrow fundsraise debt or liquidateequity capital or sell some investments in order to pay the applicable tax.
As a result of all these factors, our failure to maintain our qualification as a REIT could impair our ability to expand our business and raise capital, could materially and adversely affect the trading price of our common stock and would substantially reduce our ability to paymake distributions to our stockholders.
Our stockholdersTRSs are subject to corporate-level taxes and ourdealings with TRSs may havebe subject to a current tax liability on distributions they100% excise tax.
A REIT may own up to 100% of the stock of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRSs. Both the subsidiary and the REIT must jointly elect to reinvesttreat the subsidiary as a TRS. A corporation of which a TRS directly or indirectly owns more than 35.0% of the voting power or value of the stock will automatically be treated as a TRS. Overall, no more than 20.0% (25.0% for taxable years beginning prior to January 1, 2018) of the gross value of a REIT’s assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRSs. A TRS may hold assets and earn income that would not be qualifying assets or income if held or earned directly by a REIT, including gross income from operations pursuant to management contracts. We lease our properties that are “qualified health care properties” to one or more TRSs which, in sharesturn, contract with independent third-party management companies to operate those “qualified health care properties” on behalf of our common stock.those TRSs. In addition, we may use one or more TRSs generally to hold properties for sale in the ordinary course of a trade or business or to hold assets or conduct activities that we cannot conduct directly as a REIT. A TRS is subject to applicable U.S. federal, state, local and foreign income tax on its taxable income, as well as limitations on the deductibility of its interest expenses. In addition, the Code imposes a 100% excise tax on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis.
If our stockholders participate in“qualified health care properties” are not properly leased to a TRS or the DRIP, theyoperators of those “qualified health care properties” do not qualify as EIKs, we could fail to qualify as a REIT.
To qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy two gross income tests, under which specified percentages of our gross income must be derived from certain sources, such as “rents from real property.” Rent paid by TRSs pursuant to the lease of our “qualified health care properties” will constitute a substantial portion of our gross income. For that rent to qualify as “rents from real property” for purposes of the REIT gross income tests, the leases must be deemed to have received, andrespected as true leases for United StatesU.S. federal income tax purposes willand not be taxedtreated as service contracts, joint ventures or some other type of arrangement. If our leases are not respected as true leases for U. S. federal income tax purposes, we may fail to qualify as a REIT.
In general, under the REIT rules, we cannot directly operate any properties that are “qualified health care properties” and can only indirectly participate in the operation of “qualified health care properties” on the amount reinvested in shares of our common stockan after-tax basis by leasing those properties to independent health care facility operators or to TRSs. A “qualified health care property” is any real property (and any personal property incident to that real property) which is, or is necessary or incidental to the extentuse of, a hospital, nursing facility, assisted living facility, congregate care facility, qualified continuing care facility or other licensed facility which extends medical or nursing or ancillary services to patients and is operated by a provider of those services that is eligible for participation in the amount reinvested wasMedicare program with respect to that facility. Furthermore, rent paid by a lessee of a “qualified health care property” that is a “related party tenant” of ours will not be qualifying income for purposes of the two gross income tests applicable to REITs. However, a tax-free return of capital. In addition, our stockholders mayTRS that leases “qualified health care properties” from us will not be treated as a “related party tenant” with respect to our “qualified health care properties” that are managed by an EIK. If we incorrectly classified a property as a “qualified health care property” and leased it to a TRS, any rental income therefrom would likely not be qualifying income for United States federal tax purposes of the two gross income tests applicable to REITs.
An EIK is an independent contractor that, at the time such contractor enters into a management or other agreement with a TRS to operate a “qualified health care property,” is actively engaged in the trade or business of operating “qualified health care properties” for any person not related to us or the TRS. Among other requirements to qualify as having received an additional distribution toindependent contractor, an operator must not own, directly or indirectly (or applying attribution provisions of the extent the shares are purchased at a discount from fair market value. As a result, unless our stockholders are a tax-exempt entity, our stockholders may have to use funds from other sources to pay their tax liability on the valueCode), more than 35.0% of the shares of commonour outstanding stock received.(by value), and no person or group of persons can own more than 35.0% of the shares of our outstanding stock and 35.0% of the ownership interests of the operator (taking into account only owners of more than 5.0% of our shares and, with respect to ownership interest in such operators that are publicly traded, only holders of more than 5.0% of such ownership interests). The ownership attribution rules that apply for purposes of the 35.0% thresholds are complex. There can be no assurance that the amount of our shares beneficially owned by our operators and their owners will not exceed the above thresholds. If a healthcare facility operator at one of our properties that uses the RIDEA structure was determined to not be an EIK, any rental income we receive from the TRS with respect to such property would likely not be qualifying income for purposes of the two gross income tests applicable to REITs.
We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could increase our tax liability or reduce ouroperating flexibility.
In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made in the provisions of U.S. federal and state income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in shares of our common stock. Additional changes to the tax laws are likely to continue to occur, and we cannot assure our stockholders that any such changes will not adversely affect our taxation and our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT or the taxation of a stockholder. Any such changes could have ana material adverse effect on an investment in shares of our common stock or on the market valueprice thereof or the resale potential of our assets. Our stockholders are urged to consult with their tax advisor with respect to the impact of recent legislation on their investment in our stock and the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in shares of our common stock.
Although REITs generally receive better tax treatment than entities taxed as regular corporations, it is possible that future legislation would result in a REIT having fewer tax advantages, and it could become more advantageous for a company that invests in real estate to elect to be treated for United StatesU.S. federal and state income tax purposes as a regular corporation. As a result, our charter provides our board with the power, under certain circumstances, to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election and cause us to be taxed as a regular corporation, without the vote of our stockholders. Our board has fiduciary duties to us and our stockholders and could only cause such changes in our tax treatment if it determines in good faith that such changes are in the best interests of our stockholders.
In addition, on December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act made significant changes to the United States federal income tax rules for taxation of individuals and businesses, generally effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. In addition to reducing corporate and individual tax rates, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminates or restricts various deductions. Most of the changes applicable to individuals are temporary and apply only to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act made numerous large and small changes to the tax rules that do not affect the REIT qualification rules directly but may otherwise affect us or our stockholders. While the changes in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act generally appear to be favorable with respect to REITs, the extensive changes to non-REIT provisions in the Code may have unanticipated effects on us or our stockholders. We urge stockholders to consult with their own tax advisor with respect to the status of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and other legislative regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in shares of our common stock. We urge stockholders to consult with their own tax advisor with respect to the status of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and other legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in shares of our common stock.
In certain circumstances, we may be subject to U.S. federal, state and stateforeign income taxes even if we maintain our qualification as a REIT, which would reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Even if we maintain our qualification as a REIT, we may be subject to U.S. federal income taxes, state income taxes or stateforeign income taxes. For example, net income from a “prohibited transaction” will be subject to a 100% tax. We may not be able to make sufficient distributions to avoid excise taxes applicable to REITs. We may also decide to retain capital gains we earn from the sale or other disposition of our property and pay income tax directly on such income. In that event, our
stockholders would be treated as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. However, our stockholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have no benefit from their deemed payment of such tax liability. We may also be subject to state and local taxes or foreign taxes on our income or property, either directly or at the level of the companies through which we indirectly own our assets. Any U.S. federal, state or stateforeign taxes we pay will reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Dividends payable by REITs generally do not qualify for the reduced tax rates on dividend income as compared to regular corporations, which could adversely affect the value of our shares.
The maximum United StatesU.S. federal income tax rate for certain qualified dividends payable to domestic stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates generally is 20%20.0%. Dividends payable by REITs, however, are generally not eligible for these reduced rates for qualified dividends.dividends except to the extent the REIT dividends are attributable to “qualified dividends” received by the REIT itself. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, the Tax CutsU.S. individuals, trusts and Jobs Act permitsestates are permitted a deduction for certain pass-through business income, including “qualified REIT dividends” (generally, dividends received by a REIT stockholder that are not designated as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income), which allows United States individuals, trusts, and estatesallowing them to deduct up to 20%20.0% of such amounts, subject to certain limitations, resulting in an effective maximum United States federal income tax rate of 29.6% on such qualified REIT dividends.limitations. Although the reduced United StatesU.S. federal income tax rate applicable to dividend income from regular corporate dividends does not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends paid by REITs, the more favorable rates applicable to qualified dividends from C corporations could cause investors who are individuals, trusts and estates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay qualified dividends, which could adversely affect the valuemarket price of the shares of common stock of REITs, including our shares.shares of common stock.
Dividends on, and gains recognized on the sale of, shares by a tax-exempt stockholder may be subject to United StatesU.S. federal income tax as unrelated business taxable income.
If (1)(i) we are a “pension-held REIT,” (2)(ii) a tax-exempt stockholder has incurred (or is deemed to have incurred) debt to purchase or hold our shares or (3)(iii) a holder of our shares is a certain type of tax-exempt stockholder, dividends on, and gains recognized on the sale of, shares by such tax-exempt stockholder may be subject to United StatesU.S. federal income tax as unrelated business taxable income under the Code.
Characterization of our sale-leaseback transactions may be challenged.challenged, which could jeopardize our REIT status or require us to make an unexpected distribution.
We have participated, and may continue to participate, in sale-leaseback transactions in which we purchase real estate investments and lease them back to the sellers of such properties. Our advisor will use its best effortsWe believe we have structured and intend to structure any of our sale-leaseback transactions such that the lease will be characterized as a “true lease” and so that we will be treated as the owner of the property for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, we cannot assure our stockholders that the IRS will not challenge such characterization.take the position that specific sale-leaseback transactions that we treated as leases be re-characterized as financing arrangements or loans for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In the event that any such sale-leaseback transaction is re-characterized as a financing transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes, deductions for depreciation and cost recovery relating to such real estate investment would be disallowed or significantly reduced. If a sale-leaseback transaction is so recharacterized,re-characterized, we might fail to satisfy the REIT asset tests, or income tests or distribution requirements and, consequently, lose our REIT status.
Complying with the REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities.
To maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of shares of our common stock. We may be required to paymake distributions to our stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution, or we may be required to liquidateraise debt or equity capital or forego otherwise attractive investments in order to comply with the REIT tests. We may need to borrow funds to meet the REIT distribution requirements even if market conditions are not favorable for these borrowings. We cannot assure our stockholders that we will have access to such capital on favorable terms at the desired times, or at all. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements could materially and adversely affect us and may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.our financial results.
If ourthe operating partnership fails to maintain its status as a disregarded entity orpartnership and were to be treated as a partnership,corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, its income may be subject to taxation, which would reduce the cash available for distribution to stockholders and likely result in a loss of our REIT status.
We intend to maintain the status of theour operating partnership as a disregarded entity or as a partnership for United StatesU.S. federal income tax purposes. However, if the IRS were to successfully challenge the status of theour operating partnership as a disregarded entity or as a partnership for such purposes, it would be taxable as a corporation. In such event, this would reduce the amount of distributions that theour operating partnership could make to us. This would also likely result in ourus losing REIT status, and, if so, becoming subject to a corporate level tax on our own income. This would substantially reduce any cash available to pay distributions. In addition, if any of the partnerships or limited liability companies through which theour operating partnership owns its properties, in whole or in part, loses its characterization as a partnership and is otherwise not disregarded for United StatesU.S. federal income tax purposes, itsuch partnership or limited liability company would be subject to taxation as a corporation, thereby reducing distributions to theour operating partnership. Such a recharacterization of an underlying property ownerpartnership or limited liability company could also threaten our ability to maintain our status as a REIT.
Foreign purchasers of shares of our common stock may be subject to FIRPTA tax upon the sale of their shares of our common stock or upon the payment of a capital gains dividend.
A foreign person disposing of a United StatesU.S. real property interest, including shares of stock of a United StatesU.S. corporation whose assets consist principally of United StatesU.S. real property interests, is generally subject to withholding pursuant to the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980, as amended, or FIRPTA, on the amount received from the disposition. However, foreign pension plans and certain foreign publicly traded entities are exempt from FIRPTA withholding. Further, such FIRPTA tax does not apply to the disposition of stock in a REIT if the REIT is “domestically controlled.” A REIT is “domestically controlled” if less than 50.0% of the REIT’s stock, by value, has been owned directly or indirectly by persons who are not qualifying United StatesU.S. persons during a continuous five-year period ending on the date of disposition or, if shorter, during the entire period of the REIT’s existence. We cannot assure our stockholders that we will qualify as a “domestically controlled” REIT. If we were to fail to so qualify, amounts received by foreign investors on a sale of shares of our common stock would be subject to FIRPTA tax, unless the shares of our common stock wereare regularly traded on an established securities market and the foreign investor did not at any time during a specified period directly or indirectly own more than 10.0% of the value of our outstanding common stock. Additionally, a foreign stockholder will likely be subject to FIRPTA upon the payment of any capital gain dividendsdistribution by us if such gainthat is attributable to gain from sales or exchanges of United StatesU.S. real property interests. However, these rules dointerests, unless the shares of our common stock are regularly traded on a U.S. established securities market and the foreign investor did not applyown at any time during the 1-year period ending on the date of such distribution more than 10.0% of such class of common stock.
Risks Related to foreign pension plansOur Common Stock
An active trading market for our common stock may not be maintained.
Our common stock only recently began trading on the NYSE, and certain publicly traded entities.
Employee Benefit Plan, IRA, and Other Tax-Exempt Investor Risks
We, andwe cannot assure our stockholders that are employee benefit plans, IRAs, annuities described in Sections 403(a) or (b) of the Code, Archer Medical Savings Accounts, health savings accounts, Coverdell education savings accounts, and other arrangements that are subject to ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code (referred to generally as “Benefit Plans and IRAs”)an active trading market will be subjectsustained. Whether an active public market for shares of our common stock will be maintained depends on a number of actors, including the extent of institutional investor interest in us, the general reputation of REITs and the attractiveness of their equity securities in comparison to risks relating specifically toother equity securities (including securities issued by other real estate-based companies), our havingfinancial performance and general stock and bond market conditions. If an active trading market for shares of our common stock does not develop or is maintained, our stockholders may have difficulty selling shares of our common stock, which could adversely affect the price that our stockholders receive for such Benefit Planshares.
The market price and IRA stockholders,trading volume of shares of our common stock may be volatile.
The U.S. stock markets, including the NYSE, on which risks are discussed below.
If a stockholder that is a Benefit Plan or IRA fails to meet the fiduciaryour common stock recently began trading, have experienced significant price and other standards under ERISA or the Code asvolume fluctuations. As a result, the market price of an investmentshares of our common stock is likely to be similarly volatile, and investors in shares of our common stock may experience a decrease in the value of their shares, including decreases unrelated to our operating performance or prospects. We cannot assure our stockholders that the market price of shares of our common stock will not fluctuate or decline significantly in the future.
In addition to the risks listed in this “Risk Factors” section, a number of factors could negatively affect the share price of our common stock or result in fluctuations in the price or trading volume of shares of our common stock, including:
•the annual yield from distributions on shares of our common stock as compared to yields on other financial instruments;
•equity issuances by us, or future sales of substantial amounts of shares of our common stock by our existing or future stockholders or the perception that such issuances or future sales may occur;
•increases in market interest rates or a decrease in our distributions to stockholders that lead purchasers of shares of our common stock to demand a higher yield;
•changes in market valuations of similar companies;
•fluctuations in stock market prices and volumes;
•additions or departures of key management personnel;
•our operating performance and the performance of other similar companies;
•actual or anticipated differences in our quarterly operating results;
•changes in expectations of future financial performance or changes in estimates of securities analysts;
•publication of research reports about us or our industry by securities analysts;
•failure to qualify as a REIT;
•adverse market reaction to any indebtedness we incur in the future;
•strategic decisions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions, divestments, spin offs, joint ventures, strategic investments or changes in business strategy;
•the passage of legislation or other regulatory developments that adversely affect us or our industry;
•speculation in the press or investment community;
•changes in our earnings;
•failure to satisfy the listing requirements of NYSE;
•failure to comply with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
•actions by institutional stockholders;
•changes in accounting principles; and
•general market conditions, including factors unrelated to our performance.
In the past, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the price of their common stock. This type of litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, our ability to execute our business strategy and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Because we have a large number of stockholders and shares of our common stock have not been listed on a national securities exchange until recently, there may be significant pent-up demand to sell shares of our common stock (including our Class T common stock and Class I common stock). Significant sales of shares of our common stock, or the perception that significant sales of such shares could occur, may cause the price of shares of our common stock to decline significantly.
As of March 15, 2024, we had (i) an aggregate of 131,597,967 shares of our common stock, Class T common stock and Class I common stock issued and outstanding, (ii) 972,222 shares of unvested restricted common stock issued and outstanding, (iii) 145,993 shares of unvested restricted Class T common stock issued and outstanding, (iv) 156,604 shares of Class T common stock underlying unvested time-based restricted stock units, or RSUs, (v) 141,503 shares of Class T common stock underlying unvested performance-based RSUs (such number of shares assumes that we issue shares of our common stock underlying such unvested performance-based awards at maximum levels for performance and market conditions that have not yet been achieved; to the extent that performance or market conditions do not meet maximum levels, the actual number of shares of our common stock issued under our incentive plan would be less than the amount reflected above) and (vi) 3,501,976 shares of our common stock that may be issued for redeeming OP units. In addition, we have the right to issue an additional 2,434,654 shares of our common stock under our incentive plan. Prior to our recent offering, our common stock, Class T common stock and Class I common stock were not listed on any national securities exchange, and the ability of a stockholder could beto sell his, her or its shares was limited. Although shares of our Class T common stock and Class I common stock were not listed on a national securities exchange at the same time as our common stock, these shares are not subject to civiltransfer restrictions (other than the restrictions on ownership and criminal, iftransfer of stock set forth in our charter); therefore, such stock will be freely tradable, to extent that a market exists for such stock. As a result, it is possible that a market may develop for shares of our Class T common stock and Class I common stock, and sales of such shares, or the failure is willful, penalties.perception that such sales could occur, could have a material adverse effect on the per share trading price of shares of our common stock.
There are special considerations that apply
Our Class T common stock and Class I common stock will automatically convert into our listed common stock on August 5, 2024. As a result, there may be significant pent-up demand to Benefit Plans and IRAs investing insell shares of our common stock. StockholdersHolders of shares of our Class T common stock and Class I common stock seeking to immediately sell his, her or its shares of our common stock could engage in immediate short sales of shares of our common stock prior to the date on which the shares of our Class T common stock and Class I common stock convert into shares of our common stock and use the shares of our common stock that are Benefit Plansthey receive upon conversion of their Class T common stock and IRAs should consider whether, among other things:Class I common stock to cover these short sales in the future.
•their investment is consistent with their fiduciary obligations under ERISAAdditionally, if we exercise our option to purchase the remaining 24.0% minority membership interest held by our joint venture partner in Trilogy REIT Holdings, we may consummate the purchase transaction entirely in cash or in a combination of cash and the Code;
•their investment is made in accordance with the documents and instruments governing the Benefit Plan or IRA, including any investment policy;
•their investment satisfies the prudence and diversification requirementsnewly issued shares of ERISA;
•their investment will not impair the liquidityour Convertible Preferred Stock. If we issue shares of our Convertible Preferred Stock as part of the Benefit Planpurchase price consideration, a holder thereof, on or IRA;after July 1, 2026, may elect to convert those shares of our Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock. This conversion right may result in our issuing a substantial number of new shares of our common stock. We may also issue shares of our common stock or other equity or hybrid equity securities to fund our cash needs for any exercise of our option to purchase the remaining 24.0% minority membership interest held by our joint venture partner in Trilogy REIT Holdings. Our issuance of common stock upon a holder’s conversion of shares of our Convertible Preferred Stock, or our issuance of our Convertible Preferred Stock itself and/or the issuance of common stock or other equity or hybrid equity securities to fund the cash needs for any exercise of the option, or the mere perception that we may issue such securities, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
A large volume of sales of shares of our common stock could decrease the market price of shares of our common stock significantly and could impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of equity or hybrid securities in the future. Even if a substantial number of sales of shares of our common stock are not effected, the mere perception of the possibility of these sales could decrease the market price of shares of our common stock significantly and have a negative effect on our ability to raise capital in the future.
Future offerings of debt securities, which would be senior to our common stock, or equity securities, which would dilute our existing stockholders and may be senior to our common stock, may adversely affect our stockholders.
We may in the future attempt to increase our capital resources by offering debt or equity securities, including notes and classes of preferred or common stock. Debt securities or shares of preferred stock will generally be entitled to receive interest payments or distributions, both current and in connection with any liquidation or sale, prior to the holders of our common stock. We are not required to offer any such additional debt or preferred stock to existing common stockholders on a preemptive basis. Therefore, issuances of common stock or other equity securities will generally dilute the holdings of our existing stockholders. Because we may generally issue any such debt or preferred stock in the future without obtaining the approval of our stockholders, our stockholders will bear the risk of our future issuances reducing the market price of our common stock and diluting their proportionate ownership. Because our decision to issue debt or equity securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the form, amount, timing or nature of our future issuances.
If we exercise our option to purchase the remaining 24.0% minority membership interest held by our joint venture partner in Trilogy REIT Holdings, we may consummate the purchase transaction entirely in cash or in a combination of at least the Minimum Cash Consideration and newly issued shares of our Convertible Preferred Stock. If we elect to pay for the purchase entirely in cash, the all cash purchase price would be $240,500,000 if we consummate the purchase on or before March 31, 2024, would increase to $247,000,000 if we consummate the purchase from April 1, 2024 to and including December 31, 2024 and would further increase to $260,000,000 if we consummate the purchase on or after January 1, 2025. If, for example, we elect to pay for the purchase using only the Minimum Cash Consideration, we would pay for the remaining portion of the purchase price consideration by issuing NorthStar 9,360,000 shares of our Convertible Preferred Stock. We may finance all or any portion of the cash purchase price associated with any exercise of this purchase option with new debt, and, in such case, principal and interest payments on such debt would be senior to the rights of holders of our common stock. Similarly, if we elect to issue shares of our new Convertible Preferred Stock in connection with our exercise of this purchase option, holders of such shares will be entitled to receive dividends as well as liquidation payments prior to holders of our common stock. Specifically, unless we are current on all accumulated dividends owed on shares of our Convertible Preferred Stock for past quarterly dividend periods, we may not pay any dividends on, or repurchase, any shares of our common stock or other junior securities, subject in each case only to limited exceptions. Additionally, we may be required to issue a significant number of shares of our common stock in connection with any future conversion of such Convertible Preferred Stock, and we may issue common stock or other equity or hybrid equity securities to fund all or a portion of the cash purchase price for our option exercise. In both cases, this would result in dilution of our stockholders’ equity investment in us.
•their investment will not produce UBTI forIn addition, subject to any limitations set forth under Maryland law, our board may amend our charter to increase or decrease the Benefit Plannumber of authorized shares of stock, the number of shares of any class or IRA; and
•they willseries of stock designated or reclassify any unissued shares into other classes or series of stock without the necessity of obtaining stockholder approval. All such shares may be able to valueissued in the assets of the Benefit Plan or IRA annually in accordance with ERISA, the Code and the applicable provisions of the Benefit Plan or IRA.
ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code prohibit certain transactions that involve (i) Benefit Plans or IRAs, and (ii) any person who is a “party-in-interest” or “disqualified person” with respect to such a Benefit Plan or IRA. Consequently, the fiduciary or owner of a Benefit Plan or an IRA contemplating an investment in our common stock should consider whether we, any other person associated with the issuance of the common stock, or anysole discretion of our or their affiliates is or might become a “party-in-interest” or “disqualified person” with respect to the Benefit Plan or IRA and, if so, whether an exemption from such prohibited transaction rules is applicable.board. In addition, we have granted, and expect to grant in the United States Department of Laborfuture, equity awards under our incentive plan asset regulations provide that, subject to certain exceptions, the assets of an entity in which a plan holds an equity interest may be treated as assets of the investing plan, in which event investment made byour independent directors and certain other transactions enteredof our employees, including our executive officers, which to date have consisted of our restricted stock and RSUs, which are exchangeable into by such entity would be subject to the prohibited transaction rules. To avoid our assets from being considered “plan assets,” our charter prohibits “benefit plan investors” from owning 25% or more of the shares of our common stock priorsubject to the time that thesatisfaction of certain conditions. Finally, we have OP units outstanding which are redeemable for cash or, at our election, exchangeable into shares of our common stock.
Therefore, existing stockholders will experience dilution of their equity investment in us as we (i) sell additional shares of our common stock qualifiesin the future, (ii) sell securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our common stock, including OP units, (iii) issue restricted shares of our common stock, RSUs or other equity-based securities under our incentive plan or (iv) issue shares of our common stock in a merger or to sellers of properties acquired by us in connection with an exchange of OP units.
Because the OP units may, at our election, be exchanged for shares of our common stock, any merger, exchange or conversion between the operating partnership and another entity ultimately could result in the issuance of a substantial number of shares of our common stock, thereby diluting the percentage ownership interest of other stockholders. Because of these and other reasons, our stockholders may experience substantial dilution in their equity investment in us.
We may be unable to raise additional capital on favorable terms, or at all, needed to grow our business.
We may not be able to increase our capital resources by engaging in additional debt or equity financings. Even if we complete such financings, they may not be on favorable terms. These circumstances could materially and adversely affect our financial results and impair our ability to achieve our business objectives. Additionally, we may be required to accept terms that restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness or take other actions (including terms that require us to maintain specified liquidity or other ratios) that would otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.
If we pay distributions from sources other than our cash flows from operations, we may not be able to sustain our distribution rate, we may have fewer funds available for investment in real estate and other assets and our stockholders’ overall returns may be reduced.
Our organizational documents permit us to pay distributions from any source without limit (other than those limits set forth under Maryland law). To the extent we fund distributions from borrowings, we will have fewer funds available for investment in real estate and other real estate-related assets, and our stockholders’ overall returns may be reduced. At times, we may need to borrow funds to pay distributions, which could increase the costs to operate our business. Furthermore, if we cannot cover our distributions with cash flows from operations, we may be unable to sustain our distribution rate.
Our distributions to stockholders may change, which could adversely affect the market price of shares of our common stock.
All distributions will be at the sole discretion of our board and will depend on our actual and projected financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity, maintenance of our REIT qualification and such other matters as a class of publicly-offered securities, withinour board may deem relevant from time to time. We intend to evaluate distributions throughout 2024, and it is possible that stockholders may not receive distributions equivalent to those previously paid by us for various reasons, including: (i) we may not have enough cash to pay such distributions due to changes in our cash requirements, indebtedness, capital spending plans, operating cash flows or financial position; (ii) decisions on whether, when and in what amounts to make any future distributions will remain at all times entirely at the meaningdiscretion of the plan assets regulation. However, we cannot assureboard, which reserves the right to change our stockholdersdistribution practices at any time and for any reason; (iii) our board may elect to retain cash for investment purposes, working capital reserves or other purposes, or to maintain or improve our credit ratings; and (iv) the amount of distributions that those provisions in our charter will be effective in limiting benefit plan investors’ ownershipSubsidiaries may distribute to less than the 25% limit. Due to the complexity of these rules and the potential penalties thatus may be subject to restrictions imposed it is importantby state law, state regulators and/or the terms of any current or future indebtedness that stockholders that are Benefit Plans and IRAs consult with their own advisors regarding the potential applicability of ERISA, the Code and any similar applicable law.these subsidiaries may incur.
Stockholders have no contractual or other legal right to distributions that are Benefit Planshave not been authorized by our board and IRAsdeclared by us. We may not be limitedable to make distributions in their abilitythe future or may need to withdraw required minimumfund such distributions from external sources, as a resultto which no assurances can be given. In addition, as noted above, we may choose to retain operating cash flow, and those retained funds, although increasing the value of an investment inour underlying assets, may not correspondingly increase the market price of shares of our common stock. Our failure to meet the market's expectations with regard to future cash distributions likely would adversely affect the market price of shares of our common stock.
If Benefit Planswe fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls, we may not be able to accurately and timely report our financial results.
Effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports, effectively prevent fraud and operate successfully as a public company. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or IRAs investprevent fraud, it could have a material adverse effect on us. We are currently required to perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management to report on the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting, and we will be required to have our independent registered public accounting firm attest to the same, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. To date, the audit of our consolidated financial statements by our independent registered public accounting firm has included a consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis of designing their audit procedures, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion (as will be required pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. If a material weakness or significant deficiency was to be identified in the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we may also identify deficiencies in some of our disclosure controls and procedures that we believe require remediation. If we or our independent registered public accounting firm discover control issues, we will make efforts to improve our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls. However, there is no assurance that we will be successful. Any failure to maintain effective controls or timely effect any necessary improvement of our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls could harm operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, which could affect the listing of our common stock the Code may require such plan or IRAon NYSE. Ineffective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls could also cause investors to withdraw required minimum distributionslose confidence in our reported financial information. Any of these matters could cause a significant decline in the future. Our stock will be highly illiquid, and our share repurchase plan only offers limited liquidity. If a Benefit Plan or IRA requires liquidity, it may generally sell its shares, but such sale may be at amarket price less than the price at which such plan or IRA initially purchased its shares of our common stock. If
Prior to our recent NYSE listing, we had no operating history as a Benefit Plan or IRA failspublicly traded company and may not be able to makesuccessfully operate as a publicly traded company.
Prior to our recent listing on the NYSE, we had no operating history as a publicly traded company. We cannot assure our stockholders that the past experience of our senior management team will be sufficient for us to successfully operate as a publicly traded company. Upon completion of our recent listing on the NYSE, we were required minimum distributions, it may be subject to certain taxescomply with the NYSE listing standards, and tax penalties.
Specific rules applythis transition could place a significant strain on our management systems, infrastructure and other resources. Failure to foreign, governmentaloperate successfully as a publicly traded company would have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and church plans.
As a general rule, certain employee benefit plans, including foreign pension plans, governmental plans established or maintained in the United States (as defined in Section 3(32)per share trading price of ERISA), and certain church plans (as defined in Section 3(33) of ERISA), are not subject to ERISA’s requirements and are not “benefit plan investors” within the meaning of the plan assets regulation. Any such plan that is qualified and exempt from taxation under Sections 401(a) and 501(a) of the Code may nonetheless be subject to the prohibited transaction rules set forth in Section 503 of the Code and, under certain circumstances in the case of church plans, Section 4975 of the Code. Also, some foreign plans and governmental plans may be subject to foreign, state, or local laws which are, to a material extent, similar to the provisions of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code. Each fiduciary of a plan subject to any such similar law should make its own determination as to the need for, and the availability of, any exemption relief.our common stock.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
Not applicable.
Item 1C. Cybersecurity.
Our information technology networks, those of our operators and managers and those of third parties on whom we rely are important enablers to our ability to perform day-to-day operations of our business. Our business operations depend on the secure collection, storage, transmission and other processing of proprietary, confidential or sensitive data.
We have implemented and maintain various information security processes designed to identify, assess and manage material risks from cybersecurity threats. Our cybersecurity program includes several safeguards such as access controls, multi-factor authentication, continuous monitoring and alerting systems for internal and external threats and external vulnerability testing. Additionally, we conduct regular evaluation of our cybersecurity program, encompassing internal reviews and third-party assessments to ensure its effectiveness and resilience.
Governance
Our board retains ultimate oversight of cybersecurity risk, which it manages through our enterprise risk management program. Our board has delegated primary responsibility of overseeing cybersecurity risks to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee's responsibilities include reviewing cybersecurity strategies with management, assessing processes and controls pertaining to the management of our information technology operations and their effectiveness and seeking to confirm that management's response to potential cybersecurity incidents is timely and effective. At least annually, the Audit Committee reviews with the management team our cybersecurity risk exposures and the steps that management has taken to monitor and control such exposures. This review may cover a variety of relevant topics, potentially including recent developments, evolving standards, vulnerability assessments, third-party and independent reviews, the threat environment, technological trends and information security considerations related to our operators, managers and third parties. The scope and focus of each review are determined based on current priorities and emerging issues in cybersecurity.
Management and Cybersecurity Working Group
Reporting to the Chief Operating Officer, our Vice President of Information Technology, with extensive cybersecurity knowledge and skills from over 15 years of relevant work experience at our company and elsewhere, leads the team responsible for developing and implementing our information security program across our business. This team comprises individuals with relevant educational and technical experience, including a dedicated IT Systems & Security Administrator, with responsibility for various aspects of cybersecurity within our organizations. This team works closely with the Legal department to oversee compliance and regulatory and contractual security requirements. Our Chief Operating Officer also leads our Cybersecurity Incident Management Team, which is comprised of a cross-functional team including Internal Audit, Legal, Information Technology, Risk Management and Accounting leaders. These individuals meet regularly and are informed about and monitor the prevention, mitigation, detection and remediation of cybersecurity incidents. Our Chief Operating Officer is responsible for reporting on cybersecurity and information technology to the Audit Committee.
Information Security Program
Our Vice President of Information Technology and his information security team provide regular reports to the Chief Operating Officer and other relevant teams on various cybersecurity threats, assessments and findings. In addition to our internal cybersecurity capabilities, we also periodically engage assessors, consultants, auditors or other third parties to provide consultation and advice to assist with assessing, identifying and managing cybersecurity risks. Our management team identifies and assesses information security risks using industry practices, including those informed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
To ensure that cybersecurity is an organization-wide effort, we provide mandatory cybersecurity training at least annually for all employees with network access, including training designed to simulate and help prevent phishing and other social engineering attacks. We also employ systems and processes designed to oversee, identify and reduce the potential impact of a security incident at a third-party vendor, service provider or otherwise implicating the third-party technology and systems we use. Additionally, we maintain cybersecurity insurance providing coverage for certain costs related to cybersecurity-related incidents that impact our cybersecurity and information technology infrastructure.
Incident Response
The Cybersecurity Incident Management Team maintains and oversees an incident response plan that applies in the event of a cybersecurity threat or incident to provide a standardized framework for responding to cybersecurity incidents. The incident response plan sets out a coordinated approach to investigating, containing, documenting and mitigating incidents, including reporting findings and keeping senior management and other key stakeholders informed and involved as appropriate. The objectives of the incident response plan are to reduce the number of systems and users affected by security incidents, reduce the time a threat actor spends within our network, reduce the damage caused by the breach and reduce the time required to restore normal operations. The incident response plan also specifies the use of third-party experts for legal advice, consulting and cyber incident response.
Material Cybersecurity Risks, Threats and Incidents
While we employ several measures to prevent, detect and mitigate cybersecurity threats, there is no guarantee such efforts will be successful. We also rely on information technology and other third-party vendors to support our business, including securely processing personal, confidential, financial, sensitive or proprietary and other types of information. Despite our efforts to improve our ability, and the ability of relevant third parties', to protect against cyber threats, we may not be able to protect all information, systems, products and services. While we are not aware of any cybersecurity incidents that have materially affected us to date, there can be no guarantee that we will not be the subject of future attacks, threats or incidents that may have a material impact on our business strategy, results of operations or financial condition. Additional information on cybersecurity risks we face can be found in Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading "A breach of information technology systems on which we rely could materially and adversely impact us," which should be read in conjunction with the foregoing information.
Item 2. Properties.
As of December 31, 2020,2023, our principal executive offices are located at 18191 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 300, Irvine, California 92612. We do not have an address separate frombelieve our advisor or our co-sponsors. Since we pay our advisor fees for its services, we do not pay rentexisting leased facilities are in good condition and suitable for the useconduct of its space.
Real Estate Investments
As of December 31, 2020,2023, we operated through four reportable business segments: MOBs,integrated senior housing, senior housing — RIDEAhealth campuses, OM, triple-net leased properties and SNFs.SHOP. We own and/or operate 100% of our properties as of December 31, 2020,2023, with the exception of Central Florida Senior Housingour investments through Trilogy, or Trilogy Portfolio, Lakeview IN Medical Plaza, Southlake TX Hospital, Pinnacle Beaumont ALF, Pinnacle Warrenton ALF Catalina West Haven ALF,and Louisiana Senior Housing PortfolioPortfolio. See Note 12, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests, and Catalina Madera ALF.Note 13, Equity — Noncontrolling Interests in Total Equity, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion of our noncontrolling interests. The following table presents certain additional information about our real estate investments as of December 31, 2020:2023 (square feet and dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reportable Segment | | Number of
Buildings | | GLA
(Sq Ft) | | % of
GLA | | Aggregate
Contract
Purchase Price | | Annualized
Base Rent/
NOI(1) | | % of
Annualized
Base Rent/
NOI | | Leased
Percentage(2) |
| Medical office buildings | | 43 | | 2,136,000 | | 43.9 | % | | $ | 605,122,000 | | | $ | 47,018,000 | | | 65.0 | % | | 93.2 | % |
| Senior housing — RIDEA | | 26 | | 1,549,000 | | 31.9 | | | 264,709,000 | | | 7,583,000 | | | 10.5 | | | 74.9 | % |
| Senior housing | | 14 | | 518,000 | | 10.7 | | | 101,800,000 | | | 7,312,000 | | | 10.1 | | | 100 | % |
| Skilled nursing facilities | | 11 | | 660,000 | | 13.5 | | | 117,800,000 | | | 10,386,000 | | | 14.4 | | | 100 | % |
| Total/weighted average(3) | | 94 | | 4,863,000 | | 100 | % | | $ | 1,089,431,000 | | | $ | 72,299,000 | | | 100 | % | | 95.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reportable Segment | | Number of
Buildings/
Campuses | | GLA
(Sq Ft) | | % of
GLA | | | | Aggregate
Contract
Purchase Price | | Annualized
Base
Rent/NOI(1) | | % of
Annualized
Base Rent/NOI | | Leased
Percentage(2) |
| Integrated senior health campuses | | 125 | | 9,234 | | 49.1 | % | | | | $ | 1,948,122 | | | $ | 176,314 | | | 51.0 | % | | 85.5 | % |
| OM | | 88 | | 4,448 | | 23.6 | | | | | 1,253,089 | | | 99,206 | | | 28.7 | | | 89.2 | % |
| SHOP | | 55 | | 3,716 | | 19.7 | | | | | 802,367 | | | 30,495 | | | 8.8 | | | 81.2 | % |
| Triple-net leased properties | | 28 | | 1,424 | | 7.6 | | | | | 469,965 | | | 39,526 | | | 11.5 | | | 100 | % |
| Total/weighted average(3) | | 296 | | 18,822 | | 100 | % | | | | $ | 4,473,543 | | | $ | 345,541 | | | 100 | % | | 91.3 | % |
__________________
(1)With the exception of our SHOP and integrated senior housing — RIDEA facilities,health campuses, amount is based on annualized contractual base rent from leases in effect as of December 31, 2020.2023. For our SHOP and integrated senior housing — RIDEA facilities,health campuses, amount is based on annualized NOI, a non-GAAP financial measure. measure, due to the characteristics of the RIDEA structure. See Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Net Operating Income,, for a further discussion of NOI.
(2)Leased percentage includes all third-party leased space of theat our non-RIDEA properties included in the respective segment including(including master leases,leases), except for our SHOP and integrated senior housing — RIDEA facilitieshealth campuses where leased percentage represents resident occupancy on the available units of the RIDEA facilities.units/beds therein.
(3)Total portfolio weighted average leased percentage excludes our SHOP and integrated senior housing — RIDEA facilities.health campuses.
We own fee simple interests in all of our land, buildings and campuses, except for nine buildingsthe following properties that are located on land that is subject to ground leases: (a) 19 OM buildings; (b) five integrated senior health campuses; and (c) one SNF, in each case, for which we own fee simple interests in the building and other improvements ofon such properties subjectproperties. Additionally, we operate 20 integrated senior health campuses that were leased to the respective ground leases.Trilogy by third parties.
The following information generally applies to our properties:
•we believe all of our properties are adequately covered by insurance and are suitable for their intended purposes;
•we have no plans for any material renovations, improvements or development with respect to any of our properties, except in accordance with planned budgets;budgets and within our Trilogy Portfolio;
•our properties are located in markets where we are subject to competition for attracting new tenants and residents, as well as retaining current tenants and residents; and
•depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the buildings and capital improvements, up to 39 years, and over the shorter of the lease term or useful lives of the tenant improvements, up to 21 years. Furniture, fixtures34 years, and equipment is depreciated over the estimated useful life of furniture, fixtures and equipment, up to 2028 years.
For additional information regarding our real estate investments, see Schedule III, Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Lease Expirations
Substantially all of our leases with residents at our SHOP and integrated senior housing — RIDEA facilitieshealth campuses are for a term of one year or less. The following table presents the sensitivity of our annual base rent due to lease expirations for the next 10 years and thereafter at our properties as of December 31, 2020,2023, excluding our SHOP and integrated senior housing — RIDEA facilities:health campuses (square feet and dollars in thousands):
| | Year | Year | | Number of
Expiring
Leases | | Total Square
Feet of Expiring
Leases | | % of Leased Area
Represented by
Expiring Leases | | Annual Base Rent
of Expiring Leases(1) | | % of Total
Annual Base Rent
Represented by
Expiring Leases | Year | | Number of
Expiring
Leases | | Total Sq.
Ft. of Expiring
Leases | | % of GLA
Represented by
Expiring Leases | | Annual Base Rent
of Expiring Leases(1) | | % of Total
Annual Base Rent
Represented by
Expiring Leases |
| 2021 | | 43 | | 102,000 | | 3.2 | % | | $ | 2,213,000 | | | 3.0 | % |
| 2022 | | 38 | | 239,000 | | 7.5 | | | 5,906,000 | | | 8.1 | |
| 2023 | | 39 | | 248,000 | | 7.8 | | | 6,260,000 | | | 8.6 | |
| 2024 | 2024 | | 33 | | 259,000 | | 8.2 | | | 6,175,000 | | | 8.5 | | 2024 | | 113 | | 532 | | 9.8 | % | | $ | 12,814 | | | 8.0 | | 8.0 | % |
| 2025 | 2025 | | 31 | | 283,000 | | 8.9 | | | 6,973,000 | | | 9.6 | |
| 2026 | 2026 | | 14 | | 64,000 | | 2.0 | | | 1,674,000 | | | 2.3 | |
| 2027 | 2027 | | 15 | | 120,000 | | 3.8 | | | 3,301,000 | | | 4.5 | |
| 2028 | 2028 | | 17 | | 200,000 | | 6.3 | | | 4,834,000 | | | 6.6 | |
| 2029 | 2029 | | 20 | | 211,000 | | 6.7 | | | 6,268,000 | | | 8.6 | |
| 2030 | 2030 | | 8 | | 81,000 | | 2.6 | | | 2,520,000 | | | 3.5 | |
| 2031 | |
| 2032 | |
| 2033 | |
| Thereafter | Thereafter | | 21 | | 1,363,000 | | 43.0 | | | 26,654,000 | | | 36.7 | |
| Total | Total | | 279 | | 3,170,000 | | 100 | % | | $ | 72,778,000 | | | 100 | % | Total | | 526 | | 5,409 | | 100 | % | | $ | 159,923 | | | 100 | | 100 | % |
__________________
(1)Amount is based on the total annual contractual base rent expiring in the applicable year, based on leases in effect as of December 31, 2020.2023.
Geographic Diversification/Concentration Table
The following table lists our property locations and provides certain information regarding our portfolio’s geographic diversification/concentration as of December 31, 2020:2023 (square feet and dollars in thousands):
| | State | State | | Number of
Buildings | | GLA
(Sq Ft) | | % of
GLA | | Annualized
Base Rent/NOI(1) | | % of Annualized
Base Rent/NOI | State | | Number of
Buildings/
Campuses | | GLA (Sq Ft) | | % of GLA | | Annualized Base
Rent/NOI(1) | | % of Annualized
Base Rent/NOI |
| Alabama | Alabama | | 4 | | 260,000 | | 5.3 | % | | $ | 4,621,000 | | | 6.4 | % | Alabama | | 5 | | 290 | | | 1.5 | | 1.5 | % | | $ | 4,550 | | | 1.3 | | 1.3 | % |
| Arkansas | |
| Arizona | Arizona | | 1 | | 34,000 | | 0.7 | | | 879,000 | | | 1.2 | |
| California | California | | 9 | | 340,000 | | 7.0 | | | 1,440,000 | | | 2.0 | |
| Colorado | Colorado | | 4 | | 214,000 | | 4.4 | | | 4,383,000 | | | 6.1 | |
| Connecticut | Connecticut | | 2 | | 80,000 | | 1.6 | | | 1,994,000 | | | 2.8 | |
| District of Columbia | |
| Florida | Florida | | 10 | | 899,000 | | 18.5 | | | 4,092,000 | | | 5.7 | |
| Georgia | Georgia | | 5 | | 177,000 | | 3.6 | | | 3,987,000 | | | 5.5 | |
| Iowa | |
| Illinois | Illinois | | 1 | | 39,000 | | 0.8 | | | 558,000 | | | 0.8 | |
| Indiana | Indiana | | 7 | | 289,000 | | 5.9 | | | 4,835,000 | | | 6.6 | |
| Iowa | | 2 | | 44,000 | | 0.9 | | | 1,157,000 | | | 1.6 | |
| Kansas | Kansas | | 1 | | 76,000 | | 1.6 | | | 2,226,000 | | | 3.1 | |
| Kentucky | |
| Louisiana | Louisiana | | 7 | | 257,000 | | 5.3 | | | 2,336,000 | | | 3.2 | |
| Massachusetts | Massachusetts | | 1 | | 64,000 | | 1.3 | | | 1,259,000 | | | 1.7 | |
| Maryland | |
| Michigan | Michigan | | 12 | | 490,000 | | 10.1 | | | 7,293,000 | | | 10.1 | |
| Minnesota | Minnesota | | 1 | | 46,000 | | 0.9 | | | 1,043,000 | | | 1.4 | |
| Missouri | Missouri | | 9 | | 419,000 | | 8.6 | | | 8,735,000 | | | 12.1 | |
| Mississippi | |
| North Carolina | |
| Nebraska | |
| New Jersey | |
| Nevada | Nevada | | 1 | | 58,000 | | 1.2 | | | 1,634,000 | | | 2.3 | |
| New Jersey | | 2 | | 49,000 | | 1.0 | | | 1,159,000 | | | 1.6 | |
| North Carolina | | 1 | | 191,000 | | 3.9 | | | 4,426,000 | | | 6.1 | |
| New York | |
| Ohio | Ohio | | 2 | | 100,000 | | 2.1 | | | 1,717,000 | | | 2.4 | |
| Oregon | Oregon | | 1 | | 62,000 | | 1.3 | | | 1,637,000 | | | 2.3 | |
| Pennsylvania | Pennsylvania | | 1 | | 36,000 | | 0.7 | | | 807,000 | | | 1.1 | |
| South Carolina | |
| Tennessee | Tennessee | | 1 | | 27,000 | | 0.6 | | | 605,000 | | | 0.8 | |
| Texas | Texas | | 1 | | 61,000 | | 1.3 | | | 1,301,000 | | | 1.8 | |
| Utah | Utah | | 1 | | 66,000 | | 1.4 | | | 274,000 | | | 0.4 | |
| Virginia | Virginia | | 1 | | 74,000 | | 1.5 | | | 2,043,000 | | | 2.8 | |
| Washington | Washington | | 2 | | 77,000 | | 1.6 | | | 2,095,000 | | | 2.9 | |
| Wisconsin | Wisconsin | | 4 | | 334,000 | | 6.9 | | | 3,763,000 | | | 5.2 | |
| Total Domestic | |
| Isle of Man and UK | |
| Total | Total | | 94 | | 4,863,000 | | 100 | % | | $ | 72,299,000 | | | 100 | % | Total | | 296 | | 18,822 | | | 100 | | 100 | % | | $ | 345,541 | | | 100 | | 100 | % |
___________
(1)Amount is based on contractual base rent from leases in effect as of December 31, 2020,2023, with the exception of our SHOP and integrated senior housing — RIDEA facilities,health campuses, which amount is based on annualized NOI due to the characteristics of the RIDEA structure. See Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Net Operating Income, for a further discussion of NOI.
Indebtedness
For a discussion of our indebtedness, see Note 6,8, Mortgage Loans Payable, Net, and Note 7, Line9, Lines of Credit and Term Loans,Loan, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
For a discussion of our legal proceedings, see Note 10,11, Commitments and Contingencies — Litigation, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Market Information
There isOur common stock began trading on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “AHR” on February 7, 2024. As of March 15, 2024, we had approximately 131,597,967 aggregate shares of our common stock outstanding, held by approximately 48,187 stockholders of record. This number does not represent the actual number of beneficial owners of our common stock because shares of our common stock are frequently held in “street name” by securities dealers and others for the beneficial owners who may vote the shares. Prior to February 7, 2024, there was no established public trading market for shares of our common stock.
ToOn February 9, 2024, we closed the 2024 Offering, through which we issued 64,400,000 shares, including the underwriters’ overallotment of 8,400,000 shares, of a new class of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, at an initial price to the public of $12.00 per share.
Prior to the 2024 Offering, to assist the members of FINRA and their associated persons, pursuant to FINRA Rule 2231, we disclose in each annual report distributed to stockholders a per share estimated value of the shares, the method by which it was developed, and the date of the data used to develop the estimated value. In addition, we prepare annual statements of the estimated share value to assist fiduciaries of Benefit Plans and IRAs subject to the annual reporting requirements of ERISA in the preparation of their reports relating togenerally disclosed an investment in shares of our common stock. For these purposes, our updated estimated per share NAV is $9.22 as of September 30, 2020, which was approved and established by our boardshares based on a valuation performed at least annually. On March 18, 202115, 2023, based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities, divided by the number of shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis, calculated as of September 30, 2020.On April 2, 2020, theDecember 31, 2022, our board previously determinedauthorized and established an estimated per share NAV of our common stock of $9.54 calculated as of December 31, 2019. There is no established public trading market for the shares of our common stock at this time, and there can be no assurance that stockholders could receive $9.22 per share if such a market did exist and they sold their shares of our common stock or that they would be able to receive such amount for their shares of our common stock in the future.
Pursuant to FINRA rules, we generally disclose an estimated per share NAV of our shares based on a valuation performed at least annually, and we disclose the resulting estimated per share NAV in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K distributed to stockholders.$31.40. When determining the estimated per share NAV, there are currently no SEC, federal and state rules that establish requirements specifying the methodology to employ in determining an estimated per share NAV; provided, however, that the determination of the estimated per share NAV must be conducted by, or with the material assistance or confirmation of, a third-party valuation expert or service and must be derived from a methodology that conforms to standard industry practice. In determining the updated estimated per share NAV of our shares as of December 31, 2022, our board considered information and analysis, including valuation materials that were provided by an independent third-party valuation firm, information provided by our advisor and the estimated per share NAV recommendation made by the audit committee of our board, which committee is comprised entirely of independent directors. SeePlease see our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 19, 2021,17, 2023, for additional information regarding our independent third-party valuation firm, its valuation materials and the methodology used to determine the updated estimated per share NAV.NAV, the information and valuation materials considered by our board in determining the updated estimated per share NAV and our independent third-party valuation firm.
FINRA rules require subsequent valuations to be performed at least annually. The valuations are estimatesSecurities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
See Part III, Item 11, Executive Compensation — AHR Incentive Plan, and consequently should not be viewed as an accurate reflectionItem 12, Security Ownership of the amount of net proceeds that would result from an immediate saleCertain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters, for a discussion of our assets.
Stockholders
As of March 12, 2021, we had approximately 13,945 stockholders of record.
equity compensation plan information. Distributions
Prior to March 31, 2020, ourOur board authorized,shall authorize distributions, if any, on a quarterly basis, in such amounts as our board shall determine, and each quarterly record date for the purposes of such distributions shall be determined and authorized by our board in the last month of each calendar quarter until such time as our board changes our distribution policy. On November 14, 2022, our board suspended our DRIP offering beginning with distributions declared, if any, for the quarter ending December 31, 2022. As a daily distribution to our stockholders of record asresult of the closesuspension of business on each dayour DRIP, unless and until our board reinstates our DRIP offering, stockholders who are current participants in our DRIP were or will be paid distributions in cash.
Since the first quarter of the period commencing on May 1, 2016 and ending on March 31, 2020. The daily distributions were calculated based on 365 days in the calendar year and were2023, our board has authorized a quarterly distribution equal to $0.001643836$0.25 per share to holders of our Class T and Class I common stock, which waswe expect will continue to be paid in the future, though we cannot guarantee that our distributions will continue at the current value. Such quarterly distributions were equal to an annualized distribution rate of $0.60$1.00 per share. These distributions were aggregatedshare and paid monthly in arrears in cash, or shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP Offerings, only from legally available funds.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and its effects to our business and operations at the end The amount of the first quarter of 2020, our board decided to take steps to protect our capital and maximize our liquidity in an effort to strengthen our long-term financial prospects by decreasing our distributions to stockholders. Consequently, our board authorized a daily distribution to our stockholders of record as of the close of business on each day of the period commencing on April 1, 2020 and ending on April 30, 2021, which was or will be calculated based on 365 days in the calendar year and is equal to $0.001095890 per share of our Class T and Class I common stock. Such daily distribution is equal to an annualized distribution rate of $0.40 per share. The distributions were or will be aggregated and paid in cash or shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP, on a monthly basis, in arrears, only from legally available funds. In connection with our board’s strategic alternative review process and in order to facilitate a strategic transaction, on March 18, 2021, our board authorized the suspension of the DRIP, effective as of April 1, 2021, until such time, if any, as our board determines to reinstate the DRIP. As a result, beginning with the April 2021 distributions, which will be payable on or about May 1, 2021, there will be no further issuances of shares pursuant to the DRIP, and stockholders who are participants in the DRIP will receive cash distributions instead.
The amount ofquarterly distributions paid to our common stockholders iswas determined by our board and iswas dependent on a number of factors, including funds available for payment of distributions, our financial condition, capital expenditure requirements and annual distribution requirements needed to maintain our qualification as a REIT under the Code. We have not established any limit on the amount of net offering proceeds from our initial offering or borrowings that may be used to fund distributions, except that, in accordance with our organizational documents and Maryland law, we may not make distributions that would: (i) cause us to be unable to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; or (ii) cause our total assets to be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus senior liquidation preferences.
The distributions paid for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, along with the amount of distributions reinvested pursuant to our DRIP Offerings and the sources of distributions as compared to cash flows from operations were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Distributions paid in cash | $ | 17,837,000 | | | | | $ | 20,905,000 | | | |
| Distributions reinvested | 19,862,000 | | | | | 25,533,000 | | | |
| $ | 37,699,000 | | | | | $ | 46,438,000 | | | |
| Sources of distributions: | | | | | | | |
| Cash flows from operations | $ | 35,495,000 | | | 94.2 | % | | $ | 39,540,000 | | | 85.1 | % |
| Proceeds from borrowings | 2,204,000 | | | 5.8 | | | 1,502,000 | | | 3.3 | |
| Offering proceeds | — | | | — | | | 5,396,000 | | | 11.6 | |
| $ | 37,699,000 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 46,438,000 | | | 100 | % |
As of December 31, 2020, any distributions of amounts in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits have resulted in a return of capital to our stockholders, and all or any portion of a distribution to our stockholders may have been paid from net offering proceeds and borrowings. The payment of distributions from our net offering proceeds and borrowings have reduced the amount of capital we ultimately invested in assets and negatively impacted the amount of income available for future distributions.
As of December 31, 2020, we had an amount payable of $1,013,000 to our advisor or its affiliates primarily for asset management fees, which will be paid from cash flows from operations in the future as it becomes due and payable by us in the ordinary course of business consistent with our past practice. See Note 13, Related Party Transactions — Operational Stage, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The distributions paid for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, along with the amount of distributions reinvested pursuant to our DRIP Offerings and the sources of our distributions as compared to FFO were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Distributions paid in cash | $ | 17,837,000 | | | | | $ | 20,905,000 | | | |
| Distributions reinvested | 19,862,000 | | | | | 25,533,000 | | | |
| $ | 37,699,000 | | | | | $ | 46,438,000 | | | |
| Sources of distributions: | | | | | | | |
| FFO attributable to controlling interest | $ | 37,699,000 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 30,109,000 | | | 64.8 | % |
| Offering proceeds | — | | | — | | | 13,053,000 | | | 28.1 | |
| Proceeds from borrowings | — | | | — | | | 3,276,000 | | | 7.1 | |
| $ | 37,699,000 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 46,438,000 | | | 100 | % |
The payment of distributions from sources other than FFO may reduce the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations or may cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds. For a further discussion of FFO, a non-GAAP financial measure, including a reconciliation of our GAAP net income (loss) to FFO, see Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
We adopted our incentive plan, pursuant to which our board or a committee of our independent directors may make grants of options, restricted shares of common stock, stock purchase rights, stock appreciation rights or other awards to our independent directors, employees and consultants. The maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be issued pursuant to our incentive plan is 4,000,000. For a further discussion of our incentive plan, see Note 12, Equity — 2015 Incentive Plan, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following table provides information regarding our incentive plan as of December 31, 2020:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Plan Category | | Number of Securities
to be Issued upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights | | Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights | | Number of Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future Issuance |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) | | — | | | — | | | 3,895,000 | |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total | | — | | | | | 3,895,000 | |
________
(1)Through December 31, 2020, we granted an aggregate of 15,000 shares of our restricted Class T common stock, as defined in our incentive plan, to each of our independent directors in connection with their initial election and re-election to our board, of which 20.0% vested on the grant date and 20.0% will vest on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of grant. In addition, through December 31, 2020, we granted an aggregate of 20,000 shares of our restricted Class T common stock, as defined in our incentive plan, to each of our independent directors in consideration for their past services rendered. These shares of restricted Class T common stock vest under the same period described above. Prior to April 5, 2019, the fair value of each share at the date of grant was based on the then most recent price paid to acquire one share of our Class T common stock in our initial offering; effective April 5, 2019, the fair value of each share at the date of grant was estimated at the most recent estimated per share NAV approved and established by our board; and with respect to the initial 20.0% of shares of our restricted Class T common stock that vested on the date of grant, expensed as compensation immediately, and with respect to the remaining shares of our restricted Class T common stock, amortized over the period from the service inception date to the vesting date for each vesting tranche (i.e., on a tranche by tranche basis) using the accelerated attribution method. Shares of our restricted Class T common stock may not be sold, transferred, exchanged, assigned, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise encumbered. Such restrictions expire upon vesting. Shares of our restricted Class T common stock have full voting rights and rights to distributions. Such shares are not shown in the chart above as they are deemed outstanding shares of our common stock; however, such grants reduce the number of securities remaining available for future issuance.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
Our share repurchase plan allows for repurchases ofIn October 2023, we repurchased 9,683 shares of our common stock, by us when certain criteria are met. Share repurchases will be made at the sole discretionfor an aggregate of our board. All share repurchases are subject to a one-year holding period, except for repurchases made in connection with a stockholder’s death or “qualifying disability,” as defined in our share repurchase plan. Funds for the repurchase of shares of our common stock will come exclusively from the cumulative proceeds we receive from the sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP Offerings.
On March 31, 2020, our board suspended our share repurchase plan with respect to all repurchase requests other than repurchases resulting from the death or qualifying disability of stockholders, beginning with share repurchase requests submitted for repurchase during the second quarter of 2020. Shares of our common stock repurchased in connection with a stockholder’s death or qualifying disability were repurchased$304,000, at a repurchase price no less than 100% of the price paid to acquire the shares of our common stock from us.
In connection with our board’s strategic alternative review process and$31.40 per share in order to facilitate a strategic transaction, on March 18, 2021, our board approvedsatisfy minimum statutory withholding tax obligations associated with the suspensionvesting of our share repurchase plan with respectrestricted stock awards issued pursuant to all repurchase requests received by us after February 28, 2021, including repurchases resulting from the death or qualifying disability of stockholders.
During the three months ended December 31, 2020, we repurchased shares of our common stock as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | |
Total Number of
Shares Purchased | |
Average Price
Paid per Share | |
Total Number of Shares
Purchased As Part of
Publicly Announced
Plan or Program | | Maximum Approximate
Dollar Value
of Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the
Plans or Programs |
| October 1, 2020 to October 31, 2020 | | 86,821 | | | $ | 9.95 | | | 86,821 | | | (1) | |
| November 1, 2020 to November 30, 2020 | | — | | | $ | — | | | — | | | (1) | |
| December 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 | | — | | | $ | — | | | — | | | (1) | |
| Total | | 86,821 | | | $ | 9.95 | | | 86,821 | | | |
___________
(1)A description of the maximum number of shares that may be purchased under our share repurchase plan is included in the narrative preceding this table.AHR Incentive Plan.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.[Reserved].
Part II, Item 6 is no longer required as we have adopted certain provisions within the amendments to Regulation S-K that eliminate Item 301.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The use of the words “we,” “us” or “our” refers to Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT, IV, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT IV Holdings, LP, except where otherwise noted.
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is intended to promote understanding of our results of operations and financial condition. Such discussion is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such consolidated financial statements and information have been prepared to reflect our financial position as of December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, together with our results of operations and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018.2021.
Forward-Looking Statements
Historical results and trends should not be taken as indicative of future operations. OurCertain statements contained in this report, that are notother than historical facts, are forward-looking. Actual results may differ materially from those includedbe considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively with the Securities Act and Exchange Act, or the Acts). We intend for all such forward-looking statements to be covered by the applicable safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Acts. Such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiablecan be identified by the use of the words “expect,” “project,”forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,“can,” “could,” “would,“expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” “opinion,“possible,” “predict,“initiatives,” “focus,” “seek,” “objective,” “goal,” “strategy,” “plan,” “potential,” “seek”“potentially,” “preparing,” “projected,” “future,” “long-term,” “once,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “might,” “uncertainty,” or other similar words. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date this report is filed with the SEC.
Any such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates and any other comparableprojections about the industry and derivative terms or the negatives thereof. Our ability to predict results or the actual effectmarkets in which we operate, and beliefs of, future plans and strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors whichassumptions made by, our management and involve uncertainties that could have a material adverse effect onsignificantly affect our operations on a consolidated basisfinancial results. Such statements include, but are not limited to: (i) statements about our plans, strategies, initiatives and prospects, including any future capital-raising initiatives and planned or future acquisitions or dispositions of properties and other assets, including our option to purchase the minority membership interest in Trilogy REIT Holdings; and (ii) statements about our future results of operations, capital expenditures and liquidity. Such statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated, including, without limitation: changes in economic conditions generally and the real estate market specifically; the effects of the coronavirus, or COVID-19, pandemic, including its effects on the healthcare industry, senior housing and skilled nursing facilities and the economy in general; legislative and regulatory changes, including changes to laws governing the taxation of real estate investment trusts, or REITs; the availability of capital; our ability to pay down, refinance, restructure or extend our indebtedness as it becomes due; our ability to maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes; changes in interest rates;rates, including uncertainties about whether and when interest rates will continue to increase, and foreign currency risk; competition in the real estate industry; changes in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, policies and guidelines applicable to REITs; the success of our investment strategy; the availability of financing; the negotiation cybersecurity incidents and information technology failures, including unauthorized access to our computer systems and/or consummation of any potential strategic transaction evaluated by our special committee of our board of directors;vendors’ computer systems and our ongoing relationship with American Healthcare Investors, LLC, third-party management companies’ computer systems and/or American Healthcare Investors,their vendors’ computer systems; our ability to retain our executive officers and Griffin Capital Company, LLC, or Griffin Capital, or collectively, our co-sponsors,key employees; and their affiliates.unexpected labor costs and inflationary pressures. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K speak only as of the date on which such statements are made, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no obligation to update any such statements that may become untrue because of subsequent events. Additional information concerning us and our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC.
Overview and Background
Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT, IV, Inc., a Maryland corporation, invests inis a self-managed REIT that acquires, owns and operates a diversified portfolio of clinical healthcare real estate properties, focusing primarily on outpatient medical office buildings, senior housing, skilled nursing facilities, or SNFs, and senior housing facilitiesother healthcare-related facilities. We have built a fully-integrated management platform, with approximately 110 employees, that produce current income.operates clinical healthcare properties throughout the United States, the United Kingdom and the Isle of Man. We also operate healthcare-related facilities utilizing the structure permitted by the REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007, which is commonly referred to as a “RIDEA” structure (the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, authorizing the RIDEA structure were enacted as part of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008). Our healthcare facilities operated under a RIDEA structure include our senior housing operating properties, or SHOP, and our integrated senior health campuses. We qualified to be taxed as a REIT under the Code for federal income tax purposes beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2016,have originated and acquired secured loans and may also originate and acquire other real estate-related investments on an infrequent and opportunistic basis. We generally seek investments that produce current income; however, we intend tohave selectively developed, and may continue to qualify to be taxed as a REIT.
We raised $754,118,000 through a best efforts initial public offering, or our initial offering, and issued 75,639,681 aggregate shares of our Class T and Class I shares of our common stock. In addition, during our initial offering, we issued 3,253,535 aggregate shares of our Class T and Class I common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, as amended, or the DRIP, for a total of $31,021,000 in distributions reinvested. Following the deregistration of our initial offering, we continued issuing shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP through a subsequent offering, or the 2019 DRIP Offering. We commenced offering shares pursuant to the 2019 DRIP Offering on March 1, 2019, following the termination of our initial offering on February 15, 2019. On March 18, 2021, our board of directors, or our board, authorized the suspension of the DRIP, effective as of April 1, 2021. As of December 31, 2020, a total of $41,471,000 in distributions were reinvested that resulted in 4,342,059 shares of our common stock being issued pursuant to the 2019 DRIP Offering. We collectively refer to the DRIP portion of our initial offering and the 2019 DRIP Offering as our DRIP Offerings.
Since March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has been dramatically impacting the United States, which has resulted in an aggressive worldwide effort to contain the spread of the virus. These efforts have significantly and adversely disrupted economic markets and impacted commercial activity worldwide, including markets in which we own and/or operate properties, and the prolonged economic impact remains uncertain. In addition, the continuously evolving nature of the COVID-19 pandemic makes it difficult to ascertain the long-term impact it will have on real estate markets and our portfolio of
investments. Considerable uncertainty still surroundsselectively develop, healthcare real estate properties. We have elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We believe that we have been organized and operated, and we intend to continue to operate, in conformity with the COVID-19 pandemicrequirements for qualification and its effects ontaxation as a REIT under the population, as wellCode.
On October 1, 2021, Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc., or GAHR III, merged with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary, or Merger Sub, of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV, Inc., or GAHR IV, with Merger Sub being the surviving company, which we refer to as the effectiveness of any responses takenREIT Merger, and our operating partnership, Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV Holdings, LP, merged with and into Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Holdings, LP, or the Surviving Partnership, with the Surviving Partnership being the surviving entity, which we refer to as the Partnership Merger and, together with the REIT Merger, the Merger. Following the Merger on nationalOctober 1, 2021, our company was renamed American Healthcare REIT, Inc., and local levels by government and public health authorities and businessesthe Surviving Partnership was renamed American Healthcare REIT Holdings, LP, or our operating partnership.
Also on October 1, 2021, immediately prior to contain and combat the outbreak and spreadconsummation of the virus, includingMerger, GAHR III acquired a newly formed entity, American Healthcare Opps Holdings, LLC, which we refer to as the widespread availabilityAHI Acquisition, pursuant to a contribution and useexchange agreement dated June 23, 2021. Following the Merger and the AHI Acquisition, our company became self-managed.
See Note 1, Organization and Description of effective vaccines. In particular, government-imposed business closuresBusiness, and re-opening restrictions, as well as self-imposed restrictions of discretionary activities, have dramatically impacted the operations of our real estate investments and our tenants across the country, such as creating significant declines in resident occupancy. Further, our senior housing facilities have also experienced dramatic increases and may continue to experience increases in costs to care for residents; particularly labor costs to maintain staffing levels to care for the aged population during this crisis, costs of COVID-19 testing of employees and residents and costs to procure the volume of personal protective equipment, or PPE, and other supplies required.
We received and recognized in our accompanying consolidated financial statements stimulus funds through economic relief programs of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or the CARES Act, as discussed at Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies4, Business Combinations — Government Grants,2021 Business Combinations, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We have also taken actions to strengthen our balance sheet and preserve liquidity in response to the COVID-19 pandemic risks. From March to December 2020, we postponed non-essential capital expenditures. In addition, in March 2020, we reduced the stockholder distribution rate and partially suspended our share repurchase plan. We believe that the long-term stability of our portfolio will return once the virus has been controlled. In states where lockdown orders have been lifted or modified, the downward trends in our portfolio appear to have somewhat moderated, but we have not yet witnessed a significant rebound. We are continuously monitoring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, residents, tenants, operating partners, managers, portfolio of investments and on the United States and global economies. The prolonged duration and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has materially disrupted, and may continue to materially disrupt, our business operations and impact our financial performance. See the “Factors Which May Influence Results of Operations,” “Results of Operations” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” sections below10-K, for a further discussion.
On March 18, 2021, our board, at the recommendationdiscussion of the audit committee of our board, comprised solely of independent directors, unanimously approved and established an updated estimated per share net asset value, or NAV, of our common stock of $9.22. We provided this updated estimated per share NAV to assist broker-dealers in connection with their obligations under Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, Rule 2231 with respect to customer account statements. The updated estimated per share NAV is based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities, divided by the number of shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis, calculated as of September 30, 2020. The valuation was performed in accordance with the methodology provided in Practice Guideline 2013-01, Valuations of Publicly Registered Non-Listed REITs, or the Practice Guideline, issued by the Institute for Portfolio Alternatives, or the IPA, in April 2013, in addition to guidance from the SEC. On April 2, 2020, the board previously determined an estimated per share NAV of our common stock of $9.54 calculated as of December 31, 2019. See our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 19, 2021 for more information on the methodologies and assumptions used to determine,Merger and the limitations and risks of, our updated estimated per share NAV.AHI Acquisition.
Operating Partnership
We conduct substantially all of our operations through Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV Holdings, LP, orour operating partnership, and we are the sole general partner of our operating partnership. We are externally advised by Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV Advisor, LLC, or our advisor, pursuant to an advisory agreement, or the Advisory Agreement, between usAs of both December 31, 2023 and our advisor. The Advisory Agreement was effective as of February 16, 2016 and had a one-year initial term, subject to successive one-year renewals upon the mutual consent2022, we owned approximately 95.0% of the parties. The Advisory Agreement was last renewed pursuant tooperating partnership units, or OP units, in our operating partnership, and the mutual consent of the parties on February 11, 2021 and expires on February 16, 2022. Our advisor uses its best efforts, subject to the oversight and review of our board, to, among other things, research, identify, review and make investments in and dispositions of properties and securities on our behalf consistent with our investment policies and objectives. Our advisor performs its duties and responsibilities under the Advisory Agreement as our fiduciary. Our advisor is 75.0% owned and managed by wholly owned subsidiaries of American Healthcare Investors and 25.0%remaining 5.0% limited OP units were owned by a wholly owned subsidiary of Griffin Capital. American Healthcare Investors is 47.1% owned bythe AHI Group Holdings, LLC, or AHI Group Holdings, 45.1% indirectlywhich is owned and controlled by Colony Capital, Inc. (NYSE: CLNY), or Colony Capital, and 7.8% owned by James F. Flaherty III, a former partner of Colony Capital. We are not affiliated with Griffin Capital, Griffin Capital Securities, LLC, or our dealer manager, Colony Capital or Mr. Flaherty; however, we are affiliated with our advisor, American Healthcare Investors and AHI Group Holdings.
In October 2020, we established a special committeeJeffrey T. Hanson, the non-executive Chairman of our board which consists of alldirectors, or our board, Danny Prosky, our Chief Executive Officer, President and director, and Mathieu B. Streiff, one of our independent directors, to investigatedirectors; Platform Healthcare Investor TII, LLC; Flaherty Trust; and analyze strategic alternatives, including but not limiteda wholly-owned subsidiary of Griffin Capital Company, LLC. See Note 12, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests, and Note 13, Equity — Noncontrolling Interests in Total Equity, to the saleConsolidated Financial Statements that are a part of our assets, a listing of our sharesthis Annual Report on a national securities exchange, or a merger with another entity, including a merger with another unlisted entity that we expect would enhance our value. There can be no assurance that this strategic alternative review process will result in a transaction being pursued, or if pursued, that any such transaction would ultimately be consummated. ForForm 10-K, for a further discussion see Partof the ownership in our operating partnership.
Public Offerings
As of December 31, 2023, after taking into consideration the Merger and the impact of the reverse stock split as discussed below, we had issued 65,445,557 shares for a total of $2,737,716,000 of common stock since February 26, 2014 in our initial public offerings and our distribution reinvestment plan, or DRIP, offerings (including historical offering amounts sold by GAHR III Itemand GAHR IV prior to the Merger).
On November 10, Directors, Executive Officers2022, our board approved charter amendments to effect, on November 15, 2022, a one-for-four reverse stock split of our common stock and Corporate Governance. In connectiona corresponding reverse split of the OP units, or the Reverse Splits. All numbers of common shares and per share data, as well as the OP units in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been retroactively adjusted for all periods presented to give effect to the Reverse Splits.
On February 9, 2024, pursuant to a Registration Statement filed with the strategic alternative review process andSEC on Form S-11 (File No. 333-267464), as amended, we closed our underwritten public offering through which we issued 64,400,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, for a total of $772,800,000 in order to facilitate a strategic transaction, on March 18, 2021, our board authorizedgross offering proceeds. Such amounts include the suspensionexercise in full of the DRIP, effective asunderwriters’ overallotment option to purchase up to an additional 8,400,000 shares of April 1, 2021, until such time, if any, ascommon stock. These shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “AHR” and began trading on February 7, 2024. See Note 13, Equity, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion of our board determines to reinstate the DRIP. As a consequence of the suspensionpublic offerings.
ofOur Real Estate Investments Portfolio
During the DRIP, beginning with the April 2021 distributions, which will be payable on or about May 1, 2021, there will be no further issuances of shares pursuant to the DRIP,quarter ended December 31, 2023, we modified how we evaluate our business and stockholders who are participants in the DRIP will receive cash distributions instead. In addition, on March 18, 2021, our board approved the suspension of our share repurchase plan with respect to all repurchase requests received by us after February 28, 2021, including repurchases resulting from the death or qualifying disability of stockholders, until such time, if any, as our board determines to reinstate our share repurchase plan.
We currentlymake resource allocations, and therefore determined that we operate through four reportable business segments: integrated senior health campuses, outpatient medical, or OM, (which was formerly known as medical office buildings, senior housing, senior housing — RIDEAor MOBs), triple-net leased properties and skilled nursing facilities.SHOP. All segment information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been recast for all periods presented to reflect four reportable business segments and the change in segment name from MOBs to OM. See Note 18, Segment Reporting, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion. As of December 31, 2020,2023, we owned 89 properties, comprising 94and/or operated 296 buildings orand integrated senior health campuses including completed development and expansion projects, representing approximately 4,863,00018,822,000 square feet of gross leasable area, or GLA, for an aggregate contract purchase price of $1,089,431,000. As$4,473,543,000. In addition, as of December 31, 2020,2023, we also owned a 6.0% interest in a joint venture which owns a portfolio of integrated senior health campuses and ancillary businesses.real estate-related debt investment purchased for $60,429,000.
Critical Accounting PoliciesEstimates
Our critical accounting estimates have the most impact on the reporting of our financial condition and results of operations and require significant judgments and estimates. We believe that our critical accounting policies are those that require significant judgments and estimates such as those related to revenueare consistently applied and grant income recognition, allowance for credit losses,produce financial information that fairly present our financial condition and results of operations. Our critical accounting for property acquisitions,estimates include (1) real estate investments purchase price allocation, (2) impairment of long-lived assets, (3) goodwill, (4) revenue recognition and intangible assets, properties held for sale(5) resident receivable allowances.
These critical accounting estimates may require complex judgment in their application and qualification as a REIT. These estimates are made and evaluated on an on-goingongoing basis using information that is available as well as various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, if our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions or other matters had been different, we may have applied a different accounting treatment, resulting in a different presentation of our financial statements. We believe that our critical accounting policies affect our more significant estimates and judgments used in the preparationA discussion of our financial statements. A summary of our criticalsignificant accounting policies is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, inwithin Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have been no significant changes to our critical accounting policiesestimates during 20202023. Below is a summary of the key judgments and assumptions used in our critical accounting estimates.
Real Estate Investments Purchase Price Allocation
Upon the acquisition of real estate properties or entities owning real estate properties, we determine whether the transaction is a business combination, which requires that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed constitute a business. If the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are not a business, we account for the transaction as an asset acquisition. Under both methods, we recognize the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed; however, for a transaction accounted for as an asset acquisition, we capitalize transaction costs and allocate the purchase price using a relative fair value method allocating all accumulated costs, whereas, for a transaction accounted for as a business combination, we immediately expense transaction costs incurred associated with the business combination and allocate the purchase price based on the estimated fair value of each separately identifiable asset and liability.
In accounting for asset acquisitions and business combinations, we, with assistance from independent valuation specialists, measure the fair value of tangible and intangible identified assets and liabilities, as applicable, based on their respective fair values for acquired properties, which is then allocated to acquired investments in real estate. The fair value measurement and its allocation require significant judgment and, in some cases, involve complex calculations. These allocation assessments directly impact our financial statements.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We periodically perform an analysis that requires us to judge whether indicators of impairment exist and to estimate likely future cash flows. Projections of expected future operating cash flows require that we estimate future revenue amounts, future property operating expenses and the number of years the property is held for investment, among other than thosefactors. The subjectivity of assumptions used in the future cash flow analysis, including capitalization and growth rates, where applicable, could result in an incorrect assessment of the recoverability of the carrying value of our real estate assets. In the event that an asset group fails its recoverability test and our carrying value exceeds our estimated fair value, the subjectivity of assumptions used could result in the misstatement of the adjusted carrying value of our real estate assets and net income (loss).
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of consideration paid over the fair value of underlying identifiable net assets of a business acquired. This allocation is based upon our determination of the value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, which requires judgment and some of the estimates involve complex calculations. These allocation assessments have a direct impact
on our financial statements. Our goodwill has an indeterminate life and is not amortized but is tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. Such evaluation could involve estimated future cash flows, which is highly subjective, and is based in part on assumptions regarding future events. We take a qualitative approach, as applicable, to consider whether an impairment of goodwill exists prior to quantitatively determining the fair value of the reporting unit in step one of the impairment test. When step one of the impairment test is utilized, we compare the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. We recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied value in the current period.
Revenue Recognition
A significant portion of resident fees and services revenue represents healthcare service revenue that is reported at the amount that we expect to be entitled to in exchange for providing patient care. These amounts are due from patients, third-party payors (including health insurers and government programs), other healthcare facilities and others and include variable consideration for retroactive revenue adjustments due to settlement of audits, reviews and investigations. Such variable consideration is included in the determination of the estimated transaction price for providing care. These settlements include estimates based on the terms of the payment agreement with the payor, correspondence from the payor and our historical settlement activity, including an assessment to ensure that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the retroactive adjustment is subsequently resolved. Estimated settlements are adjusted in future periods as adjustments become known (that is, new information becomes available), or as years are settled or are no longer subject to such audits, reviews and investigations.
Resident Receivable Allowances
An allowance is maintained for estimated losses resulting from the adoptioninability of new accounting standards.residents and payors to meet the contractual obligations under their lease or service agreements. Substantially all of such allowances are recorded as direct reductions of resident fees and services revenue as contractual adjustments provided to third-party payors or implicit price concessions in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Our determination of the adequacy of these allowances is based primarily upon evaluations of historical loss experience, the residents’ financial condition, security deposits, cash collection patterns by payor and by state, current economic conditions, future expectations in estimating credit losses and other relevant factors.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements, see Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Acquisitions and Dispositions in 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 20182021
For a discussion of our property acquisitions and dispositions of investments in 2020, 2019,2023, 2022 and 2018,2021, see Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Properties Held for Sale, Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net, and Note 4, Business Combinations, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Factors Which May Influence Results of Operations
Due toOther than the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in the United States and globally, since March 2020, our residents, tenants, operating partners and managers have been materially impacted. The situation continues to present a meaningful challenge for us as an owner and operatoreffects of healthcare facilities, as the impact of the virus continues to result in a massive strain throughout the healthcare system. COVID-19 is particularly dangerous among the senior population and results in heightened risk to our senior housing and skilled nursing facilities, and we continue to work diligently to implement aggressive protocols at such facilities in line with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines to limit the exposure and spread of COVID-19.
Each type of real estate asset we own has been impacted by COVID-19 to varying degrees. The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted the businesses of our medical office tenants and their ability to pay rent on a timely basis. In the early months of the pandemic when many of the states had implemented “stay at home” orders, in excess of 50.0% of our tenants in medical office buildings had been classified by state governments as “non-essential” and were ordered to either shut down entirely, or significantly limit hours of operations, which prevented or significantly limited our tenants from seeing patients in their offices and thereby creating unprecedented revenue pressure on such tenants. Substantially all of our physician practices and other medical service providers of non-essential and elective services in our medical office buildings are now open. However, the number of patients returning to such offices varies across practice types and geographic markets as people may continue to delay office visits due to the fears or uncertainties associated with COVID-19 despite the availability of services. Additionally, while restrictions have been at least partially lifted or modified in many states, there remains a risk of reclosures in states where infection rates rise, or where a resurgence of COVID-19 emerges, which may put additional pressure on our operations.
For our managed senior housing — RIDEA facilities, based on preliminary information available to management as of February 26, 2021, we have experienced an approximate 16.0% decline in our resident occupancies since February 2020 largely
due to a decline in move-ins of prospective residents because of shelter-in-place, re-opening and other quarantine restrictions imposed by government regulations and guidelines, as well as the resurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic in late 2020 and into early 2021. In addition, we continue to experience challenges in attracting prospective residents to our senior housing — RIDEA facilities because they are choosing to delay moving into communities until the threat posed by the virus has declined. Our facilities have adopted phased-in approaches to facility operations depending on the market in which they operate, which range from stringent restrictions of essential visitors and frequent testing of staff and residents to allowing screened visitors and limited activities. At the same time that our managed senior housing — RIDEA facilities are facing a reduction in revenue associated with lower resident occupancies, they are also experiencing a significant increase in costs to care for residents, particularly increased labor costs to maintain staffing levels to care for the aged population during this crisis, costs of testing employees and residents for COVID-19 and costs to procure the volume of PPE and other supplies required to maintain health and safety measures and protocols. Since March 2020, our leased, non-RIDEA senior housing and skilled nursing facility tenants have also experienced and may continue to experience similar pressures related to occupancy declines and expense increases, which may impact their ability to pay rent and have an adverse effect on our operations. Therefore, our immediate focus for 2021 continues to be on resident occupancy recovery and operating expense management. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2020, there have been recent developments around the production, availability and widespread distribution and use of effective COVID-19 vaccines, which we believe will be important to a rebound in our resident occupancy levels over time.
To date, the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have been significant, rapidly evolving and may continue into the future. Managers of our RIDEA properties continue to evaluate their options for financial assistance such as utilizing programs within the CARES Act passed by the federal government on March 27, 2020,inflation discussed below, as well as other statenational economic conditions affecting real estate generally, and local government relief programs. The CARES Act includes multiple opportunities for immediate cash reliefas otherwise disclosed in our risk factors, we are not aware of any material trends or uncertainties that may reasonably be expected to have a material impact, favorable or unfavorable, on revenues or income from the form of grantsacquisition, disposition, management and tax benefits. Someoperation of our tenants within our non-RIDEA properties have sought financial assistance from the CARES Act through programs such as the Payroll Protection Program and deferralproperties. For a further discussion of payroll tax payments. However, these government assistance programs are not expected to fully offset the negative financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and there can be no assurance that these programs will continue or the extent to which they will be expanded. Therefore, the ultimate impact of such relief from the CARES Act and other enacted andfactors that could impact our future legislation and regulation, including the extent to which relief funds from such programs will provide meaningful support for lost revenue and increasing costs, is uncertain.
The information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is based on data currently available to us and will likely change as the COVID-19 pandemic progresses. We continue to closely monitor COVID-19 developments and are continuously assessing the implications to our business, residents, tenants, operating partners, managers and our portfolio of investments. We anticipate that the government-imposedresults or self-imposed lockdowns and restrictions have created pent-up demand for doctors’ visits and move-ins into senior housing facilities; however, we cannot predict with reasonable certainty when such demand will return to pre-COVID-19 pandemic levels. The medical community understands COVID-19 far better today than it did just a few months ago, and we are now equipped with greater therapeutics and other treatments to mitigate its impact. Likewise, we are optimistic about the recent favorable reports regarding the efficacy of vaccines. The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and may continue to have, an adverse effect on the operations of our business, and therefore, we are unable to predict the full extent or nature of the future impact to our financial condition and results of operations at this time. We expect the trends discussed above with respect to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic to continue. Thus, the lasting impact of the COVID-19 pandemic over the next 12 months could be significant and will largely depend on future developments, including the duration of the crisis and the success of efforts to contain or treat COVID-19, such as the widespread availability and use of effective vaccines, which cannot be predicted with confidence at this time. See the “Results of Operations” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” sections below, as well asperformance, see Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K,10-K.
Inflation
For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 inflation has affected our operations. The annual rate of inflation in the United States was 3.2% in February 2024, as measured by the Consumer Price Index. We believe inflation has impacted our operations such that we have experienced, and continue to experience, increases in the cost of labor, services, energy and supplies, and therefore continued inflationary pressures on our integrated senior health campuses and SHOP could continue to impact our profitability in future periods. To offset the impact of inflation on the cost of labor and services, we had our RIDEA managers bill higher than average annual rent and care fee increases for existing residents in 2023 and 2024, as compared to prior years, while adjusting market rates as frequently as needed based on competitor pricing and market conditions. We believe this practice will improve operating performance in our integrated senior health campuses and SHOP, as well as increase rent coverage and the stability of our real estate revenue in our triple-net leased properties over time.
For properties that are not operated under a RIDEA structure, there are provisions in the majority of our tenant leases that help us mitigate the impact of inflation. These provisions include negotiated rental increases, which historically range from 2% to 3% per year, reimbursement billings for operating expense pass-through charges and real estate tax and insurance reimbursements. However, due to the long-term nature of existing leases, among other factors, the leases may not reset frequently enough to cover inflation.
In addition, inflation also caused, and may continue to cause, an increase in the cost of our variable-rate debt due to rising interest rates. See Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk — Interest Rate Risk, for a further discussion.
Scheduled Lease Expirations
Excluding our SHOP and integrated senior housing — RIDEA facilities,health campuses, as of December 31, 2020,2023, our properties were 95.7%91.3% leased and, during 2021, 3.2%2024, 9.8% of the leased GLA is scheduled to expire. Our leasing strategy focuses on negotiating renewals for leases scheduled to expire during the next 12 months. In the future, if we are unable to negotiate renewals, we will try to identify new tenants or collaborate with existing tenants who are seeking additional space to occupy. As of December 31, 2020,2023, our remaining weighted average lease term was 8.36.6 years, excluding our SHOP and integrated senior housing — RIDEA facilities.health campuses.
Our combined SHOP and integrated senior housing— RIDEA facilitieshealth campuses were 74.9%84.4% leased for the year endedas of December 31, 2020 and substantially2023. Substantially all of our leases with residents at such properties are for a term of one year or less.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 20182021
Our operating results are primarily comprised of income derived from our portfolio of properties and expenses in connection with the acquisition and operation of such properties. Our primary sources of revenue include rent generated by our leased, non-RIDEA properties and resident fees and services revenue from our RIDEA properties. Our primary expenses include property operating expenses and rental expenses. In general, we expect amountssuch revenues and expenses related to our portfolio of operatingRIDEA properties to increase in the future based on a full yeardue to an overall increase in occupancies, resident fees and pricing of operations of recently acquired properties.care services provided.
We segregate our operations into reporting segments in order to assess the performance of our business in the same way that management reviews our performance and makes operating decisions. As ofDuring the quarter ended December 31, 2020,2023, we operatedmodified how we evaluate our business and make resource allocations, and therefore determined that we operate through four reportable business segments: integrated senior health campuses, OM (which was formerly known as MOBs), triple-net leased properties and SHOP. All segment information included herein has been recast for all periods presented to reflect four reportable business segments with activities relatedand the change in segment name from MOBs to investingOM.
The most significant drivers behind changes in medical office buildings, senior housing, senior housing — RIDEAour consolidated results of operations for the year ended 2023 compared to the corresponding period in 2022 were primarily due to the adverse effects of inflation, which resulted in increases in the cost of labor, services, energy and skilled nursing facilities.
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant adverse impact onsupplies; our acquisitions and dispositions of investments subsequent to December 31, 2022; and the transitions of the operations of our real estate portfolio. Although we have experienced some delays in receiving rent payments from our tenants, as of December 31, 2020, we have collected 100% of contractual rent from our leased, non-RIDEAcertain senior housing and skilled nursing facility tenants.Most of our skilled nursing facilities provide behavioral health services with resident occupancies that are less impacted by either the COVID-19 pandemic or restrictions on elective surgeries than traditional skilled nursing facilities. In addition, substantially all of the contractual rent through December 2020 from our medical office building tenants has been received. However, given the significant ongoing uncertainty of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic over the next 12 months, we are unablefrom triple-net leased properties to predict the impact it will have on such tenants’ continued ability to pay rent. We received lease concession requests from some of our medical office building tenants primarily during the second quarter of 2020 that resulted in an insignificant number of concessions granted, such as in the form of rent abatements, in conjunction with a lease term extension for up to five years, or rent payment deferrals requiring repayment within one year. Such lease term extensions related to lease concessions that benefited us and do not have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements. No contractual rent for our medical office building tenants was forgiven.
ChangesRIDEA structures. The changes in our consolidated operating results of operations for 2022 as compared to 2021 are primarily due to owning 94the acquisition of GAHR IV’s portfolio of 92 buildings, or approximately 4,799,000 square feet of GLA, as a result of December 31, 2020,the Merger on October 1, 2021; the disruption to our normal operations as compared to 87 buildings asa result of December 31, 2019the COVID-19 pandemic; grant income received; and as compared to 69 buildings asthe adverse effect of December 31, 2018. In addition, there areinflation. Additional drivers behind the changes in our operatingconsolidated results by reporting segment due to transitioning theof operations of the two senior housing facilities within Lafayette Assisted Living Portfolio to a RIDEA structureare discussed in February 2019 and the five senior housing facilities within Northern California Senior Housing Portfolio to a RIDEA structure in March 2020. As of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we owned the following types of properties:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | Number
of
Buildings | | Aggregate
Contract
Purchase Price | | Leased
% | | Number
of
Buildings | | Aggregate
Contract
Purchase Price | | Leased
% | | Number
of
Buildings | | Aggregate
Contract
Purchase Price | | Leased
% |
| Medical office buildings | 43 | | | $ | 605,122,000 | | (1) | 93.2 | % | | 43 | | | $ | 603,639,000 | | | 93.1 | % | | 29 | | | $ | 423,439,000 | | | 93.5 | % |
| Senior housing — RIDEA | 26 | | | 264,709,000 | | (2) | (3) | | | 14 | | | 153,850,000 | | | (3) | | | 12 | | | 137,100,000 | | | (3) | |
| Senior housing | 14 | | | 101,800,000 | | | 100 | % | | 19 | | | 147,600,000 | | | 100 | % | | 18 | | | 150,350,000 | | | 100 | % |
| Skilled nursing facilities | 11 | | | 117,800,000 | | | 100 | % | | 11 | | | 117,800,000 | | | 100 | % | | 10 | | | 110,800,000 | | | 100 | % |
| Total/weighted average(4) | 94 | | | $ | 1,089,431,000 | | | 95.7 | % | | 87 | | | $ | 1,022,889,000 | | | 95.8 | % | | 69 | | | $ | 821,689,000 | | | 96.4 | % |
___________
(1)Includes a $1,483,000 earn-out paid in June 2020 in connection with our property acquisition of Overland Park MOB in August 2019.more detail below. See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net and Note 4, Business Combinations, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion of such earn-out.
(2)Includes a $360,000 earn-out paid in December 2020 in connection with our property acquisition of Catalina Madera ALF in January 2020. See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion of such earn-out.
(3)For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019acquisitions and 2018, the leased percentage for the resident units of our senior housing RIDEA facilities was 74.9%, 83.2.%dispositions during 2023, 2022 and 77.7%, respectively, based on daily average occupancy of licensed beds/units.2021.
(4)As of December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, we owned and/or operated the following types of properties (dollars in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | | | | | | |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | |
| | Number
of
Buildings/
Campuses | | Aggregate
Contract
Purchase Price | | Leased
% (1) | | Number
of
Buildings/
Campuses | | Aggregate
Contract
Purchase Price | | Leased
% (1) | | Number
of
Buildings/
Campuses | | Aggregate
Contract
Purchase Price | | Leased
% (1) | | | | | | |
| Integrated senior health campuses | 125 | | | $ | 1,948,122 | | | 85.5 | % | | 120 | | | $ | 1,898,591 | | | 84.2 | % | | 122 | | $ | 1,787,686 | | | 77.5 | % | | | | | | |
| OM | 88 | | | 1,253,089 | | | 89.2 | % | | 104 | | | 1,369,596 | | | 89.0 | % | | 105 | | 1,378,995 | | | 92.0 | % | | | | | | |
| SHOP | 55 | | | 802,367 | | | 81.2 | % | | 51 | | | 787,797 | | | 77.0 | % | | 47 | | 706,871 | | | 72.5 | % | | | | | | |
| Triple-net leased properties | 28 | | | 469,965 | | | 100 | % | | 39 | | | 568,265 | | | 100 | % | | 39 | | 568,265 | | | 100 | % | | | | | | |
| Total/weighted average(2) | 296 | | | $ | 4,473,543 | | | 91.3 | % | | 314 | | | $ | 4,624,249 | | | 92.2 | % | | 313 | | | $ | 4,441,817 | | | 94.3 | % | | | | | | |
___________
(1)Leased percentage includes all third-party leased space at our non-RIDEA properties (including master leases), except for our SHOP and integrated senior health campuses where leased percentage represents resident occupancy on the available units/beds therein.
(2)Weighted average leased percentage excludes our SHOP and integrated senior housing — RIDEA facilities.health campuses.
Revenues and Grant Income
Our primary sources of revenue include rent generated by our leased, non — RIDEA properties, and resident fees and services revenue generated by our RIDEA properties and rent from our RIDEAleased, non-RIDEA properties. For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, resident fees and services revenue primarily consisted of rental fees related to resident leases, extended health care fees and other ancillary services, and real estate revenue primarily consisted of base rent and expense recoveries. The amount of revenuerevenues generated by our RIDEA properties depends principally on our ability to maintain theresident occupancy rates of currently leased space and to lease available space at the then existing marketrental rates. We also receive grant income. Revenues and grant income by reportable segment consisted of the following for the periods then ended:ended (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Real Estate Revenue | | | | | |
| Medical office buildings | $ | 65,509,000 | | | $ | 54,508,000 | | | $ | 34,339,000 | |
| Skilled nursing facilities | 11,968,000 | | | 11,681,000 | | | 4,266,000 | |
| Senior housing | 8,844,000 | | | 8,421,000 | | | 8,994,000 | |
| Total real estate revenue | 86,321,000 | | | 74,610,000 | | | 47,599,000 | |
| Resident Fees and Services Revenue | | | | | |
| Senior housing — RIDEA | 67,793,000 | | | 46,160,000 | | | 36,857,000 | |
| Total resident fees and services revenue | 67,793,000 | | | 46,160,000 | | | 36,857,000 | |
| Grant Income | | | | | |
| Senior housing — RIDEA | 1,005,000 | | | — | | | — | |
| Total grant income | 1,005,000 | | | — | | | — | |
| Total revenues and grant income | $ | 155,119,000 | | | $ | 120,770,000 | | | $ | 84,456,000 | |
For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, real estate revenue primarily comprised of base rent of $63,615,000, $56,373,000 and $35,340,000, respectively, and expense recoveries of $18,196,000, $14,453,000 and $8,933,000, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, resident fees and services consisted of rental fees related to resident leases and extended health care fees. The increase in resident fees and services for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, is primarily due to the acquisition of seven senior housing — RIDEA facilities subsequent to December 31, 2019 and the transition of five senior housing facilities within Northern California Senior Housing Portfolio to a RIDEA structure in March 2020. The increase in resident fees and services for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, was primarily due to a full year of operations during 2019 for two senior housing — RIDEA facilities acquired during the year ended December 31, 2018. The amount of revenue generated by our properties depends principally on our ability to maintain the occupancy rates of currently leased space and to lease available space at the then existing market rates.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized $1,005,000 of grant income at our senior housing — RIDEA facilities related to government grants through CARES Act economic stimulus programs. See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Government Grants, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | |
| Resident Fees and Services Revenue | | | | | | | |
| Integrated senior health campuses | $ | 1,481,880 | | | $ | 1,254,665 | | | $ | 1,025,699 | | | |
| SHOP | 186,862 | | | 157,491 | | | 98,236 | | | |
| Total resident fees and services revenue | 1,668,742 | | | 1,412,156 | | | 1,123,935 | | | |
| Real Estate Revenue | | | | | | | |
| OM | 146,068 | | | 148,717 | | | 97,297 | | | |
| Triple-net leased properties | 44,333 | | | 56,627 | | | 44,071 | | | |
| Total real estate revenue | 190,401 | | | 205,344 | | | 141,368 | | | |
| Grant Income | | | | | | | |
| Integrated senior health campuses | 7,475 | | | 24,820 | | | 13,911 | | | |
| SHOP | — | | | 855 | | | 3,040 | | | |
| Total grant income | 7,475 | | | 25,675 | | | 16,951 | | | |
| Total revenues and grant income | $ | 1,866,618 | | | $ | 1,643,175 | | | $ | 1,282,254 | | | |
Rental ExpensesResident Fees and Property Operating ExpensesServices Revenue
Rental expensesFor our integrated senior health campuses segment, we increased resident fees and rental expensesservices revenue by $227,215,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily due to: (i) improved resident occupancy and higher resident fees as a percentageresult of an increase in billing rates; (ii) an increase of $118,320,000 related to our acquisition of the remaining 50.0% interest in a privately held company, RHS Partners, LLC, or RHS, in August 2022, which owns and/or operates 16 integrated senior health campuses located in Indiana; and (iii) an increase of $41,121,000 due to the expansion of our customer base, expansion of services offered and increases in billing rates for such services at an ancillary business unit within Trilogy Investors, LLC, or Trilogy. Such amounts were partially offset by a decrease in total resident fees and services revenue of $11,888,000 due to dispositions within our integrated senior health campuses segment during the third and fourth quarters of 2022.
For our integrated senior health campuses segment, we increased resident fees and services revenue by $69,992,000 for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, due to: (i) improved resident occupancy; (ii) our acquisition of the 50.0% controlling interest in RHS; and (iii) an increase of $11,480,000 due to our acquisition of an integrated senior health campus in Kentucky in January 2022.
For our SHOP segment, we increased resident fees and services revenue by $29,371,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily due to: (i) our acquisition of a portfolio of seven senior housing facilities in Texas within our SHOP segment in December 2022, which increased revenue by $25,375,000; (ii) an increase of $12,714,000 due to the transitioning of SNFs within the Central Wisconsin Senior Care Portfolio to a RIDEA structure in March 2023; and (iii) an increase of $2,817,000 due to the transitioning of senior housing facilities within the Michigan ALF Portfolio to a RIDEA structure in November 2023. The remaining increase in resident fees and services revenue for our SHOP segment was primarily attributable to improved resident occupancy and higher resident fees as a result of increases in billing rates. Such increases were partially offset by a decrease of $18,755,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, due to real estate dispositions within our SHOP segment during the fourth quarter of 2022 and during the year ended December 31, 2023.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, $43,582,000 in resident fees and services revenue for our SHOP segment was due to the increase in the size of our portfolio as a result of the Merger. The remaining increase in resident fees and services revenue for our SHOP segment for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, was primarily attributable to: (i) improved resident occupancy; (ii) higher resident move-in fees; (iii) an increase of $5,661,000 due to transitioning the leased senior housing facilities within Delta Valley ALF portfolio to a RIDEA structure and including such facilities within SHOP on December 2021; and (iv) an increase of $1,995,000 due to the acquisition of a portfolio of seven senior housing facilities in Texas in December 2022, which is included within our SHOP segment.
Real Estate Revenue
For the year ended December 31, 2023, we experienced a decrease in real estate revenue within our triple-net leased properties segment of $12,294,000, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily due to: (i) the transitioning of SNFs within the Central Wisconsin Senior Care Portfolio to a RIDEA structure in March 2023 and recording the full amortization of $8,073,000 of above-market leases; and (ii) the transitioning of senior housing facilities within Michigan ALF Portfolio to a RIDEA structure in November 2023 and recording the full amortization of $2,756,000 of above-market leases. We also experienced a decrease in real estate revenue for our OM segment for the year ended December 31, 2023 of $2,649,000, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily due to a decrease of $4,948,000 related to OM building dispositions during the fourth quarter of 2022 and during the year ended December 31, 2023, and a decrease of $579,000 due to the early lease termination of Cullman AL OM III during the fourth quarter of 2023. Such decreases were partially offset by a $2,965,000 increase in real estate revenue for our OM segment due to the full amortization of below-market leases within Cullman AL OM III due to such lease termination during the fourth quarter of 2023.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, $67,234,000 of real estate revenue was primarily due to the increase in the size of our portfolio as wella result of the Merger. Such amounts were partially offset by a decrease in rental revenue for our senior housing — leased segment of $2,200,000 for the year ended December 31, 2022, as propertycompared to the year ended December 31, 2021, primarily due to transitioning the leased senior housing facilities within Delta Valley ALF portfolio to a RIDEA structure and including such facilities within SHOP in December 2021. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2022, we experienced a decrease in rental revenue for our OM segment of $782,000, primarily due to a one-time lease termination fee recognized in June 2021 for Stockbridge GA OM III.
Grant Income
For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, we recognized $7,475,000, $25,675,000 and $16,951,000, respectively, of grant income at our integrated senior health campuses and SHOP primarily related to government grants received through Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act economic stimulus programs. As of April 2023, the federal government’s coronavirus public health emergency declaration expired, and certain relief measures have been wound down, and others are being phased out.
Property Operating Expenses and Rental Expenses
Integrated senior health campuses and SHOP typically have a higher percentage of direct operating expenses to revenue than OM buildings and triple-net leased properties due to the nature of RIDEA-type facilities where we conduct day-to-day operations. Property operating expenses and property operating expenses as a percentage of resident fees and services revenue and grant income, as well as rental expenses and rental expenses as a percentage of real estate revenues, by reportable segment consisted of the following for the periods then ended:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Rental Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Medical office buildings | | $ | 22,068,000 | | | 33.7 | % | | $ | 17,528,000 | | | 32.2 | % | | $ | 9,934,000 | | | 28.9 | % |
| Senior housing | | 806,000 | | | 9.1 | % | | 1,142,000 | | | 13.6 | % | | 1,214,000 | | | 13.5 | % |
| Skilled nursing facilities | | 576,000 | | | 4.8 | % | | 556,000 | | | 4.8 | % | | 351,000 | | | 8.2 | % |
| Total rental expenses | | $ | 23,450,000 | | | 27.2 | % | | $ | 19,226,000 | | | 25.8 | % | | $ | 11,499,000 | | | 24.2 | % |
| Property Operating Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Senior housing — RIDEA | | $ | 60,224,000 | | | 87.5 | % | | $ | 37,434,000 | | | 81.1 | % | | $ | 30,023,000 | | | 81.5 | % |
| Total property operating expenses | | $ | 60,224,000 | | | 87.5 | % | | $ | 37,434,000 | | | 81.1 | % | | $ | 30,023,000 | | | 81.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | |
| Property Operating Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Integrated senior health campuses | $ | 1,335,817 | | | 89.7 | % | | $ | 1,133,480 | | | 88.6 | % | | $ | 943,743 | | | 90.8 | % | | | | |
| SHOP | 166,493 | | | 89.1 | % | | 148,046 | | | 93.5 | % | | 86,450 | | | 85.4 | % | | | | |
| Total property operating expenses | $ | 1,502,310 | | | 89.6 | % | | $ | 1,281,526 | | | 89.1 | % | | $ | 1,030,193 | | | 90.3 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Rental Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| OM | $ | 54,457 | | | 37.3 | % | | $ | 56,390 | | | 37.9 | % | | $ | 36,375 | | | 37.4 | % | | | | |
| Triple-net leased properties | 3,018 | | | 6.8 | % | | 3,294 | | | 5.8 | % | | 2,350 | | | 5.3 | % | | | | |
| Total rental expenses | $ | 57,475 | | | 30.2 | % | | $ | 59,684 | | | 29.1 | % | | $ | 38,725 | | | 27.4 | % | | | | |
For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018,2023, the increase in total property operating expenses primarily consistedfor our integrated senior health campuses segment, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, was predominately due to (i) increased occupancy at the facilities within such segment; (ii) an increase of administration$97,515,000 attributable to our acquisition of the 50.0% controlling interest in RHS; and benefits expense(iii) an increase of $46,406,000, $28,844,000$43,202,000 within Trilogy’s ancillary business unit due to higher labor costs associated with the expansion of services offered and $23,128,000, respectively. Theinflation impacting the costs. Such amounts were partially offset by a decrease in total property operating expenses of $9,282,000 due to real estate dispositions within our integrated senior health campuses segment during the third and fourth quarters of 2022. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the increase in total property operating expenses for our integrated senior health campuses segment, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, was predominately due to higher operating expenses as a result of increased occupancy, as well as $77,097,000 due to our acquisition of the 50.0% controlling interest in RHS and our acquisition of an integrated senior health campus in January 2022.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, total property operating expenses for our SHOP segment primarily increased, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, due to: (i) an increase of $20,707,000 due to the acquisition of a portfolio of seven senior housing facilities within our SHOP segment in Texas in December 2022; (ii) an increase of $12,979,000 due to the transitioning of SNFs within the Central Wisconsin Senior Care Portfolio from triple-net leased properties to a RIDEA structure in March 2023; (iii) an increase of $3,847,000 due to the transitioning of senior housing facilities within the Michigan ALF Portfolio from triple-net leased properties to a RIDEA structure in November 2023; (iv) higher operating expenses as a result of increased occupancy; and (v) higher labor costs due to an increase in employee wages. Such amounts were partially offset by a decrease in total property operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020,2023, as compared to the corresponding prior year period, is primarilyended December 31, 2022, of $22,047,000 due to real estate dispositions within our SHOP segment during the three months ended December 31, 2022 and during the year ended December 31, 2023.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, rental expenses increased by $19,760,000 and property operating expenses increased by $46,897,000 for our SHOP due to the increase in the size of our portfolio as a result of the Merger. The remaining increase in total property operating expenses for our SHOP segment was due to: (i) higher operating expenses as a result of increased occupancy; (ii) an increase in labor costs, such as a significant increase in employee wages, agency fees and temporary labor expenses; (iii) an increase of $4,743,000 due to transitioning the leased senior housing facilities within Delta Valley ALF portfolio to a RIDEA structure and including such facilities within SHOP in December 2021; and (iv) an increase of $1,961,000 due to the acquisition of a portfolio of seven senior housing — RIDEA facilities subsequent toin Texas within our SHOP segment in December 31, 2019 and the transition2022.
General and Administrative
GeneralFor the year ended December 31, 2023, general and administrative expenses consisted of the followingwere $47,510,000, compared to $43,418,000 for the periods then ended:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Asset management and property management oversight fees — affiliates | $ | 10,063,000 | | | $ | 8,276,000 | | | $ | 4,975,000 | |
| Professional and legal fees | 3,454,000 | | | 3,664,000 | | | 1,436,000 | |
| Bank charges | 678,000 | | | 268,000 | | | 240,000 | |
| Board of directors fees | 599,000 | | | 255,000 | | | 253,000 | |
| Bad debt expense | 510,000 | | | 1,482,000 | | | 1,274,000 | |
| Transfer agent services | 493,000 | | | 524,000 | | | 362,000 | |
| Directors’ and officers’ liability insurance | 259,000 | | | 244,000 | | | 212,000 | |
| Franchise taxes | 253,000 | | | 129,000 | | | 100,000 | |
| Restricted stock compensation | 215,000 | | | 207,000 | | | 185,000 | |
| Other | 167,000 | | | 186,000 | | | 135,000 | |
| Total | $ | 16,691,000 | | | $ | 15,235,000 | | | $ | 9,172,000 | |
year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in general and administrative expenses of $4,092,000 was primarily the result of an increase of $1,712,000 in 2020 asstock compensation expense and $1,694,000 in bad debt expense.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, general and administrative expenses were $43,418,000 compared to 2019 is$43,199,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in general and administrative expenses of $219,000 was primarily due to the purchaseresult of additional propertiesan increase of $17,638,000 in 2019payroll and 2020 and thus, incurring highercompensation costs for the personnel hired as a result of the AHI Acquisition, partially offset by a decrease in our asset management and property management oversight fees to our advisor or its affiliates, as well as $641,000 in professional and legal fees and fees to the special committee of our board related to the investigation and analysis of strategic alternatives. Such increases in general and administrative expenses were partially offset by a decrease in bad debt expense for our accounts receivable$17,141,000 as a result of a change in lease accounting guidance in 2019. The increase in general and administrative expenses in 2019 as compared to 2018 was primarily due to the purchase of additional properties in 2018 and 2019 and thus incurring higher asset management and property management oversight fees to our advisor or its affiliates and higher professional and legal fees. General and administrative expenses alsoAHI Acquisition.
increased by $1,731,000 in 2019 as compared to 2018 in connection with transitioning the operations of two senior housing facilities within Lafayette Assisted Living Portfolio and Northern California Senior Housing Portfolio to a RIDEA structure.
Business Acquisition Related Expenses
For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, acquisition related expenses were $(160,000) and $1,974,000, respectively, which primarily related to net costs recovered or incurred in pursuit of properties that did not result in an acquisition. For the year ended December 31, 2018,2023, we recorded business acquisition expenses of $5,795,000 primarily due to: (i) $2,315,000 in aggregate transaction costs related to the transition of SNFs within the Central Wisconsin Senior Care Portfolio and the transition of senior housing facilities within the Michigan ALF Portfolio from triple-net leased properties to RIDEA structures in 2023; (ii) $2,105,000 of costs incurred in the pursuit of real estate and real estate-related investment opportunities; and (iii) $1,260,000 in aggregate acquisition costs for properties operated under a RIDEA structure and included in our SHOP segment. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we recorded business acquisition expenses were $2,795,000, which wereof $4,388,000 primarily incurred in connection with $1,895,000 in transaction costs incurred in December 2022 related primarily to the acquisition fee paid uponof seven senior housing facilities in Texas, $938,000 in transaction costs related to the purchaseacquisition of 6.0%a pharmaceutical business in April 2022, and $914,000 of costs incurred in the total membership interestspursuit of real estate investments that did not close.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, the decrease in Trilogy REIT Holdings, LLC on October 1, 2018.business acquisition expenses, as compared to the year December 31, 2021, primarily related to a decrease of $12,599,000 in third-party legal costs and professional services incurred related to the Merger and the AHI Acquisition, partially offset by an increase of $3,158,000 in transaction costs related to our business combinations and an increase of $807,000 in dead-deal costs incurred in the pursuit of real estate investments that did not close.
Depreciation and Amortization
For the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018,2021, depreciation and amortization was $50,304,000, $45,626,000were $182,604,000, $167,957,000 and $32,658,000,$133,191,000, respectively, andwhich primarily consisted primarily of depreciation on our operating properties of $31,563,000, $27,435,000$147,587,000, $141,257,000 and $16,723,000,$109,036,000, respectively, and amortization onof our identified intangible assets of $18,459,000, $18,074,000$32,323,000, $23,934,000 and $15,874,000,$21,111,000, respectively. IncludedFor the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, the increase in depreciation and amortization of $14,647,000 was primarily due to: (i) an increase in depreciation and amortization within our SHOP segment and our integrated senior health campuses segment as a result of acquisitions that occurred subsequent to December 31, 2022, as well as development and capital expenditures since December 31, 2022; (ii) the full amortization of an aggregate $6,635,000 of in-place leases related to the transition of SNFs within the Central Wisconsin Senior Care Portfolio to a RIDEA structure in March 2023 and the transition of senior housing facilities within the Michigan ALF Portfolio to a RIDEA structure in November 2023; (iii) the full amortization and depreciation of an aggregate $1,823,000 related to a lease termination within Cullman AL OM III; and (iv) the full depreciation of $1,157,000 of depreciable assets as a result of storm damage affecting our properties in Louisiana, Nebraska, North Carolina and Texas. Such amounts were partially offset by a decrease in depreciation and amortization as a result of real estate dispositions within our SHOP segment and our OM segment subsequent to December 31, 2022.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, the increase in depreciation and amortization of $34,766,000, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, was primarily the result of the increase in depreciable assets in our portfolio as a result of the Merger resulting in depreciation and amortization expense of $27,280,000 as well as an increase in depreciable assets in our portfolio as a result of acquisitions within our integrated senior health campuses segment of $9,368,000. Such amounts were partially offset by a decrease of $1,979,000 in depreciable assets in our portfolio as a result of a real estate disposition within our OM segment during the year ended December 31, 2019 is $6,226,0002022.
Interest Expense
Interest expense, including gain or loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments, consisted of the following for the periods then ended:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Interest expense: | | | | | |
| Line of credit and term loans and derivative financial instruments | $ | 17,193,000 | | | $ | 13,014,000 | | | $ | 4,984,000 | |
| Mortgage loans payable | 793,000 | | | 1,030,000 | | | 715,000 | |
| Amortization of deferred financing costs: | | | | | |
| Line of credit and term loans | 1,880,000 | | | 2,028,000 | | | 1,000,000 | |
| Mortgage loans payable | 40,000 | | | 78,000 | | | 76,000 | |
| Loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments | 870,000 | | | 4,385,000 | | | — | |
| Amortization of debt discount/premium | 49,000 | | | 41,000 | | | 13,000 | |
| Total | $ | 20,825,000 | | | $ | 20,576,000 | | | $ | 6,788,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | |
| Interest expense: | | | | | | | |
| Lines of credit and term loan and derivative financial instruments | $ | 96,417 | | | $ | 52,351 | | | $ | 33,966 | | | |
| Mortgage loans payable | 55,584 | | | 41,417 | | | 36,253 | | | |
| Amortization of deferred financing costs: | | | | | | | |
| Lines of credit and term loan | 3,060 | | | 3,000 | | | 4,261 | | | |
| Mortgage loans payable | 2,284 | | | 1,988 | | | 1,652 | | | |
| Amortization of debt discount/premium, net | 3,549 | | | 827 | | | 773 | | | |
| Loss (gain) in fair value of derivative financial instruments | 926 | | | (500) | | | (8,200) | | | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | 345 | | | 5,166 | | | 2,655 | | | |
| Interest on finance lease liabilities | 353 | | | 261 | | | — | | | |
| Interest expense on financing obligations and other liabilities | 1,599 | | | 946 | | | 1,377 | | | |
| Total | $ | 164,117 | | | $ | 105,456 | | | $ | 72,737 | | | |
The increase in total interest expense in 2020for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to 2019 isthe year ended December 31, 2022, was primarily due to: (i) an increase in debt balances during 2023; (ii) a higher weighted average effective interest rate on our variable debt, which was 7.50% and 6.44% as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively; (iii) a $2,722,000 increase in amortization of debt discount/premium, net; and (iv) a $1,426,000 change from gain to loss in fair value of our derivative financial instruments. Such increases in total interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, were primarily offset by $3,756,000 of net proceeds from our interest rate swaps and a $4,821,000 decrease in loss on extinguishments of debt.
The increase in total interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, was primarily related to an increase in debt balancesinterest expense incurred on our linelines of credit and term loans. Suchloans and mortgage loans payable due to: (i) a larger debt portfolio as a result of the Merger; (ii) an increase was partially offset by thein variable interest rates; (iii) a decrease in lossthe gain in fair value recognized on our derivative financial instruments that we entered into in February 2019of $7,700,000; and August 2020, as well as the January 2020 payoff of one mortgage loan payable with a principal balance of $7,738,000 and a decline in interest rates on our line of credit and term loans. The increase in interest expense in 2019 compared to 2018 is primarily related to(iv) an increase in loss on debt balancesextinguishment of $2,511,000. Such increase in total interest expense was partially offset by a decrease in amortization of deferred financing costs on our linelines of credit and term loans as well as an increase in loss in fair value recognized on our derivative financial instruments that we entered into in February 2019.of $1,261,000. See Note 6,8, Mortgage Loans Payable, Net, and Note 7, Line9, Lines of Credit and Term Loans, and Note 8, Derivative Financial Instruments,Loan, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion.discussion of debt extinguishments.
ImpairmentGain or Loss on Dispositions of Real Estate Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2020,2023, we recognized an aggregate impairment chargenet gain on dispositions of $3,642,000our real estate investments of $32,472,000 primarily related to the sale of six SHOP within our Central Florida Senior Housing Portfolio and 16 OM buildings. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we recognized an aggregate net gain on twodispositions of our real estate investments of $5,481,000 related to the sale of one OM building, three senior housing facilities within our Central Florida Senior Housing Portfolio and two integrated senior health campuses. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we recognized an aggregate net loss on dispositions of our real estate investments of $100,000 related to the sale of one OM building, one SNF and two integrated senior health campuses. See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Properties Held for Sale, and Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Impairments
For the year ended December 31, 2023, we recognized aggregate impairment charges of $13,899,000 for two of our SHOP within the Northern California Senior Housing Portfolio and for one of our OM buildings within the Homewood AL Portfolio. The remaining carrying valuesFor the year ended December 31, 2022, we recognized aggregate impairment charges on our real estate investments of such facilities were reclassified$54,579,000 related to properties held for sale.our SHOP within the Central Florida Senior Housing Portfolio, Pinnacle Warrenton ALF and the Mountain Crest Senior Housing Portfolio. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we recognized an impairment charge of $3,335,000 on an OM building, Mount Dora Medical Center. See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion. No impairment charges ondiscussion of impairments of such real estate investments were recognized for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.investments.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, we recognized an impairment loss of $10,520,000 related to the write-off of trade name intangible assets at ancillary business units within Trilogy. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, we did not recognize impairment losses with respect to trade name intangible assets.
For the year ended December 31, 2023 and 2021, we did not recognize any goodwill impairment.For the year ended December 31, 2022, we determined that goodwill pertaining to our SHOP reporting segment was fully impaired and recognized an impairment loss of $23,277,000 in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. See Note 18, Segment Reporting, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion of such goodwill impairment.
Gain on Re-measurement of Previously Held Equity Interest
For the year ended December 31, 2023, we recognized a $726,000 gain on re-measurement of the fair value of our previously held equity interest in Memory Care Partners, LLC. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we recognized $19,567,000 gain on re-measurement of the fair value of our previously held equity interest in RHS. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we did not recognize any gain on re-measurement of any previously held equity interest. See Note 4, Business Combinations, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion of the acquisitions of previously held equity interests.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of funds primarily consist of operatingliquidity are cash flows from operations, borrowings under our lines of credit and borrowings. Inproceeds from dispositions of real estate investments. For the normal course of business,next 12 months, our principal demands for fundsliquidity needs are for payment ofto: (1) fund property operating expenses and general and administrative expenses; (2) meet our debt service requirements (including principal and interest); (3) fund development activities and capital improvement expenditures, interest on our indebtedness,expenditures; and (4) make distributions to our stockholders, and repurchases of our common stock. We estimate that we will require approximately $10,139,000as required for us to pay interest on our outstanding indebtedness in 2021, based on interest rates in effectcontinue to qualify as of December 31, 2020, and that we will require $477,507,000 to pay principal on our outstanding indebtedness in 2021. Such principal on our outstanding indebtedness includes $476,900,000 of outstanding principal as of December 31, 2020 on our line of credit and term loans that are scheduled to mature on November 19, 2021; however, we intend to satisfy certain conditions pursuant to the related credit agreement and pay the required fee in order to exercise our option to extend the maturity date for one year. We also require resources to make certain payments to our advisor and its affiliates. See Note 13, Related Party Transactions, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a further discussion of our payments to our advisor and its affiliates. Generally, cash needs for such items will be met primarily from operations and also through borrowings, as needed. Our total capacity to pay operating expenses, capital improvement expenditures, interest, distributions and repurchases is a function of our current cash position, our borrowing capacity on our line of credit, as well as any future indebtedness that we may incur.
Due to the impact the COVID-19 pandemic has had on the United States and globally, and the uncertainty of the severity and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and its effects, beginning in March 2020, our board decided to take steps to protect our capital and maximize our liquidity in an effort to strengthen our long-term financial prospects by decreasing our distributions to stockholders and suspending our share repurchase plan. Consequently, our board approved a reduced daily distribution rate for April 2020 through April 2021 equal to $0.001095890 per share of our Class T and Class I common stock, which is equal to an annualized distribution rate of $0.40 per share, a decrease from the annualized rate of $0.60 per share previously paid by us. See the “Distributions” section below for a further discussion. In addition, on March 31, 2020, our board suspended our share repurchase plan with respect to all repurchase requests other than repurchases resulting from the death or qualifying disability of stockholders, beginning with share repurchase requests submitted for repurchase during the second quarter of 2020. Furthermore, in connection with our board’s strategic alternative review process and in order to facilitate a strategic transaction, on March 18, 2021, our board authorized the suspension of the DRIP, effective as of April 1, 2021, and also approved the suspension of our share repurchase plan with respect to all repurchase requests received by us after February 28, 2021, including repurchases resulting from the death or qualifying disability of stockholders. Our board shall determine if and when it is in the best interest of our company and stockholders to reinstate our DRIP or share repurchase plan. As of December 31, 2020, our cash on hand was $17,411,000 and we had $53,100,000 available on our line of credit.REIT. We believe that these resourcesthe sources of liquidity described above will be sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements for the foreseeable future,next 12 months and wethereafter. We do not anticipate a need to raise funds from other sources within the next 12 months.have any material off-balance sheet arrangements that we expect would materially affect our liquidity and capital resources.
Material Cash Requirements
Capital Improvement Expenditures
A capital plan for each investment is established upon acquisition that contemplates the estimated capital needs of that investment, including costs of refurbishment, tenant improvements or other major capital expenditures. The capital plan also sets forth the anticipated sources of the necessary capital, which may include operating cash generated by the investment, capital reserves, a line of credit or other loan established with respect to the investment, other borrowings or additional equity investments from us orand joint venture partners. The capital plan for each investment is adjusted through ongoing, regular reviews of our portfolio or as necessary to respond to unanticipated additional capital needs. Based on the budget for the properties we own as of December 31, 2020, we estimate that our discretionary expenditures for capital and tenant improvements could require up to $9,385,000 within the next 12 months. As of December 31, 2020,2023, we had $457,000$17,818,000 of restricted cash in loan impounds and reserve accounts to fund a portion of such capital expenditures.
Other Liquidity Needs
In the event that there is a shortfall in net cash available due to various factors, including, without limitation, the timing of distributions or the collection of receivables, we may seek to obtain capital to pay distributions by means of secured or unsecured debt financing through one or more third parties, or our advisor or its affiliates. There are currently no limits or restrictions Based on the usebudget for the properties we owned as of proceeds from our advisor or its affiliatesDecember 31, 2023, we estimated that unspent discretionary expenditures for capital and tenant improvements as of such date are equal to $76,082,000 for 2024, although actual expenditures are dependent on many factors which would prohibit us from making the proceeds available for distribution. We may also pay distributions from cash from capital transactions, including, without limitation, the sale of one or more of our properties.are not presently known.
Contractual Obligations
The following table provides information with respect to: (i) the maturity and scheduled principal repayment of our secured mortgage loans payable and lines of credit and term loan; (ii) interest payments on our mortgage loans payable and lines of credit and term loan, excluding the effect of our interest rate swaps; (iii) ground and other lease obligations; and (iv) financing and other obligations as of December 31, 2023 (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Payments Due by Period |
| | 2024 | | 2025-2026 | | 2027-2028 | | Thereafter | | Total |
| Principal payments — fixed-rate debt | $ | 48,168 | | | $ | 293,080 | | | $ | 66,232 | | | $ | 582,845 | | | $ | 990,325 | |
| Interest payments — fixed-rate debt | 35,096 | | | 54,786 | | | 43,166 | | | 311,937 | | | 444,985 | |
| Principal payments — variable-rate debt | 263,277 | | | 719,928 | | | 550,364 | | | 27,142 | | | 1,560,711 | |
| Interest payments — variable-rate debt (based on rates in effect as of December 31, 2023) | 103,174 | | | 124,099 | | | 6,160 | | | 4,665 | | | 238,098 | |
| Ground and other lease obligations | 35,834 | | | 70,226 | | | 71,324 | | | 166,314 | | | 343,698 | |
| Financing obligations and other obligations | 31,662 | | | 11,077 | | | 9,899 | | | 31,471 | | | 84,109 | |
| Total | $ | 517,211 | | | $ | 1,273,196 | | | $ | 747,145 | | | $ | 1,124,374 | | | $ | 3,661,926 | |
Distributions and Share Repurchases
For information on distributions, see Part II, Item 5, Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities — Distributions, and the “Distributions” section below. For information on our share repurchase plan, see Note 13, Equity — Share Repurchase Plan, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Credit Facilities
As of December 31, 2023, we were party to a credit agreement, as amended, with an aggregate maximum principal amount up to $1,050,000,000, or the 2022 Credit Facility. In addition, we are party to an agreement, as amended, regarding a senior secured revolving credit facility with an aggregate maximum principal amount of $400,000,000, or the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility. On February 14, 2024, we, through our operating partnership, entered into an agreement that supersedes and replaces the 2022 Credit Facility with a credit facility with an aggregate maximum principal amount of up to $1,150,000,000, or the 2024 Credit Facility. See Note 9, Lines of Credit and Term Loan, and Note 21, Subsequent Events — 2024 Credit Facility, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion.
As of December 31, 2023, our aggregate borrowing capacity under the 2022 Credit Facility and the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility, as amended, was $1,450,000,000. As of December 31, 2023, our aggregate borrowings outstanding under our credit facilities was $1,224,723,000 and we had an aggregate of $225,277,000 available on such facilities. We believe that the resources described above will be sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements for the next 12 months and the longer term thereafter.
Cash Flows
The following table sets forth changes in cash flows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — beginning of period | $ | 15,846,000 | | | $ | 14,590,000 | | | $ | 7,103,000 | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 35,495,000 | | | 39,540,000 | | | 15,423,000 | |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (76,456,000) | | | (199,934,000) | | | (411,554,000) | |
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 43,240,000 | | | 161,650,000 | | | 403,618,000 | |
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — end of period | $ | 18,125,000 | | | $ | 15,846,000 | | | $ | 14,590,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | |
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — beginning of period | $ | 111,906 | | | $ | 125,486 | | | $ | 152,190 | | | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 98,535 | | | 147,768 | | | 17,913 | | | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 9,396 | | | (118,578) | | | (138,652) | | | |
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (129,062) | | | (42,924) | | | 94,109 | | | |
| Effect of foreign currency translation on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | 7 | | | 154 | | | (74) | | | |
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — end of period | $ | 90,782 | | | $ | 111,906 | | | $ | 125,486 | | | |
The following summary discussion of our changes in our cash flows is based on our accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is not meant to be an all-inclusive discussion of the changes in our cash flows for the periods presented below.
Operating Activities
For the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018,2021, cash flows provided by operating activities were primarily related to the cash flows provided by our property operations, and $1,005,000 of grant income, offset by payments of general and administrative expenses.expenses and interest payments on our outstanding indebtedness. In general, cash flows from operating activities are affected by the timing of cash receipts and payments, as well as the substantial increase in net operating income for properties within our integrated senior health campuses segment since 2021 due to improved resident occupancy and expense management. See the “Results of Operations” section above for a further discussion. In general,addition, the increase of $129,855,000 in net cash flows provided by operating activities will be affected byduring the timingyear ended December 31, 2022, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, was due to the increase in the size of cash receipts and payments.our portfolio as a result of the Merger on October 1, 2021, thereby increasing our net operating income.
Investing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, the change from net cash used in investing activities to net cash provided by investing activities was primarily due to a $136,235,000 increase in proceeds from dispositions of real estate investments and a $27,847,000 decrease in cash paid to acquire real estate investments. Such amounts were partially offset by a $28,271,000 increase in development and capital expenditures and an $17,962,000 increase in the issuance of real estate notes receivable.The decrease of $20,074,000 in net cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, was primarily due to a $43,798,000 increase in proceeds from dispositions of real estate, a $17,852,000 decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash acquired in connection with the Merger on October 1, 2021 and a $8,175,000 decrease in developments and capital expenditures. Such amounts were partially offset by a $13,714,000 payment to acquire the 50.0% controlling interest in RHS in August 2022. See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net and Note 4, Business Combinations, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion of our acquisitions and dispositions.
Financing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2020, cash flows used in investing activities related primarily2023, as compared to our 2020 property acquisitions in the amount of $68,509,000 and the payment of $8,308,000 for capital expenditures. For the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, the increase in net cash used in financing activities was primarily due to the: (i) $113,911,000 change from net borrowings under our lines of credit to net payments on our lines of credit; (ii) $25,162,000 increase in distributions paid to common stockholders; and (iii) $21,266,000 increase in payments on financing and other obligations. Such increases were offset by the $64,382,000 change from net payments on mortgage loans payable to net borrowings under mortgage loans payable and $20,230,000 decrease in repurchases of common stock. During 2023, we repaid our lines of credits primarily from operating cash flows, net proceeds from dispositions and proceeds from long-term mortgage loans payable financed at lower interest rates. The increase in cash used in investing activities relatedto pay distributions to common stockholders was primarily due to our 2019 property acquisitionsboard’s suspension of our DRIP offering beginning with distributions declared for the quarter ending December 31, 2022. The decrease in cash used to repurchase our common stock was primarily due to our board’s suspension of our share repurchase plan beginning with share repurchase requests for the amountquarter ending December 31, 2022.
The decrease of $195,249,000 and the payment of $6,497,000 for capital expenditures. For$137,033,000 in net cash provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2018, cash flows used in investing activities related primarily to our 2018 acquisitions in the amount of $355,070,000, our investment in an unconsolidated entity for $48,000,000 and the payment of $4,257,000 for capital expenditures. We anticipate that cash flows used in investing activities will primarily be affected by the timing of capital expenditures, and generally will decrease2022, as compared to prior years as we have substantially completed the acquisition phase of our real estate investment strategy.
Financing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2020, cash flows provided by financing activities related2021, was primarily due to a decrease in net borrowings onunder our linemortgage loans payable of credit of $80,100,000, partially offset by $17,837,000$269,296,000, a $28,334,000 increase in distributions paid to our common stockholders the January 2020 payoff of one mortgage loan payable withand a principal balance of $7,738,000 and share repurchases of $6,214,000. For$20,317,000 payment to repurchase our common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2019, cash flows provided2022, we also paid $2,075,000 in offering costs in connection with the filing of our Registration Statement on Form S-11 for our underwritten public offering that closed in February 2024. No such costs were paid during the year ended December 31, 2021. Such amounts were partially offset by financing activities related primarily toan increase in net borrowings onunder our linelines of credit and term loans of $121,800,000 as well as funds raised from investors in our initial offering in the amount$161,900,000 and borrowings under a financing obligation of $90,438,000, partially offset by $20,905,000$25,900,000. The change in distributions paid to our common stockholders was due to the paymentsuspension of offering costsall stockholder distributions on May 29, 2020 in response to the impact of $19,136,000the COVID-19 pandemic, which the board of directors of GAHR III subsequently reinstated in connection with our initial offering and 2019 DRIP Offering and $8,609,000June 2021. The change in share repurchases. Forrepurchases was due to the year ended Decembersuspension of the GAHR III share repurchase plan from May 31, 2018, cash flows provided2020 through October 4, 2021, when the partial reinstatement of our share repurchase plan was approved by financing activities related primarily to funds raised from investors in our initial offering in the amountboard.
Table of $254,017,000 and net borrowings on our line of credit and term loans of $190,900,000, partially offset by the payment of offering costs of $19,817,000 in connection with our initial offering, distributions to our common stockholders of $13,989,000, the payment of deferred financing costs of $4,092,000 in connection with our line of credit and mortgage loans payable and $3,312,000 in repurchases of common stock. ContentsOverall, we anticipate cash flows from financing activities to decrease in the future since we terminated our initial offering in February 2019. Distributions
The income tax treatment for distributions reportable for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022, and 20182021 was as follows:follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Ordinary income | $ | 5,479,000 | | | 14.5 | % | | $ | 10,099,000 | | | 21.8 | % | | $ | 11,909,000 | | | 37.7 | % |
| Capital gain | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Return of capital | 32,193,000 | | | 85.5 | | | 36,317,000 | | | 78.2 | | | 19,673,000 | | | 62.3 | |
| $ | 37,672,000 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 46,416,000 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 31,582,000 | | | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | |
| Ordinary income | $ | 2,208 | | | 2.9 | % | | $ | 40,745 | | | 46.5 | % | | $ | 7,989 | | | 26.3 | % | | | | |
| Capital gain | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | |
| Return of capital | 73,614 | | | 97.1 | | | 46,890 | | | 53.5 | | | 22,406 | | | 73.7 | | | | | |
| $ | 75,822 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 87,635 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 30,395 | | | 100 | % | | | | |
Amounts listed above do not include distributions paid on nonvested shares of our restricted common stock which have been separately reported.
The following tables reflect distributions we paid for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, along with the amount of distributions reinvested pursuant to our DRIP offering, as applicable, and the sources of distributions as compared to cash flows from operations or funds from operations attributable to controlling interest, or FFO, a non-GAAP financial measure (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Distributions paid in cash | $ | 76,284 | | | | | $ | 51,122 | | | | | $ | 22,788 | | | |
| Distributions reinvested | — | | | | | 36,812 | | | | | 7,666 | | | |
| $ | 76,284 | | | | | $ | 87,934 | | | | | $ | 30,454 | | | |
| Sources of distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash flows from operations | $ | 76,284 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 87,934 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 17,913 | | | 58.8 | % |
| Proceeds from borrowings | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 12,541 | | | 41.2 | |
| $ | 76,284 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 87,934 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 30,454 | | | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Distributions paid in cash | $ | 76,284 | | | | | $ | 51,122 | | | | | $ | 22,788 | | | |
| Distributions reinvested | — | | | | | 36,812 | | | | | 7,666 | | | |
| $ | 76,284 | | | | | $ | 87,934 | | | | | $ | 30,454 | | | |
| Sources of distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FFO attributable to controlling interest | $ | 65,567 | | | 86.0 | % | | $ | 87,934 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 30,454 | | | 100 | % |
| Proceeds from borrowings | 10,717 | | | 14.0 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| $ | 76,284 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 87,934 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 30,454 | | | 100 | % |
As of December 31, 2023, any distributions of amounts in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits have resulted in a return of capital to our stockholders, and some portion of a distribution to our stockholders may have been paid from borrowings. For a further discussion of FFO, including a reconciliation of our GAAP net loss to FFO, see “Funds from Operations and Normalized Funds from Operations” below.
See Item 5, Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities — Distributions, for a further discussion of our distributions.
Financing
We anticipate that our overall leverage will approximate 50.0% of the combined market value of all of our properties and other real estate-related investments, as determined at the end of each calendar year. For these purposes, the fair market value of each asset will be equal to the purchase price paid for the asset or, if the asset was appraised subsequent to the date of purchase, then the fair market value will be equal to the value reported in the most recent independent appraisal of the asset. Our policies do not limit the amount we may borrow with respect to any individual investment. As of December 31, 2020, our aggregate borrowings were 39.5% of the combined market value of all of our real estate investments.
Under our charter, we have a limitation on borrowing that precludes us from borrowing in excess of 300% of our net assets without the approval of a majority of our independent directors. Net assets for purposes of this calculation are defined to be our total assets (other than intangibles), valued at cost prior to deducting depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other non-cash reserves, less total liabilities. Generally, the preceding calculation is expected to approximate 75.0% of the aggregate cost of our real estate and real estate-related investments before depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other similar non-cash reserves. In addition, we may incur mortgage debt and pledge some or all of our real properties as security for that debt to obtain funds to acquire additional real estate or for working capital. Furthermore, we may borrow if we otherwise deem it necessary or advisable to ensure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. As of March 26, 2021 and December 31, 2020, our leverage did not exceed 300% of the value of our net assets.
Mortgage Loans Payable, Net
For a discussion of our mortgage loans payable, net, see Note 6,8, Mortgage Loans Payable, Net, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Lines of Credit and Term LoansLoan
For a discussion of our linelines of credit and term loans,loan, see Note 7, Line9, Lines of Credit and Term Loans,Loan, and Note 21, Subsequent Events — 2024 Credit Facility, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
REIT Requirements
In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we are required to distribute to our stockholders a minimum of 90.0% of our annualREIT taxable income, excluding net capital gains.income. Existing Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, guidance includes a safe harbor pursuant to which publicly offered REITs can satisfy the distribution requirement by distributing a combination of cash and stock to stockholders. In general, to qualify under the safe harbor, each stockholder must elect to receive either cash or stock, and the aggregate cash component of the distribution to stockholders must represent at least 20.0% of the total distribution. In May 2020, the IRS issued similar guidance that lowered the cash component of the distribution to 10.0% for dividends declared between April 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020. In the event that there is a shortfall in net cash available due to factors including, without limitation, the timing of such distributions or the timing of the collection of receivables, we may seek to obtain capital to paymake distributions by means of secured and unsecured debt financing through one or more unaffiliated third parties. We may also paymake distributions fromwith cash from capital transactions including, without limitation, the sale of one or more of our properties.
Commitments and Contingencies
For a discussion of our commitments and contingencies, see Note 10,11, Commitments and Contingencies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Debt Service Requirements
A significant liquidity need is the payment of principal and interest on our outstanding indebtedness. As of December 31, 2020,2023, we had $18,766,000 ($17,827,000, net$1,326,313,000 of discount/premiumfixed-rate and deferred financing costs) of fixed-ratevariable-rate mortgage loans payable outstanding secured by our properties. As of December 31, 2020,2023, we had $476,900,000$1,224,723,000 outstanding and $53,100,000$225,277,000 remained available under our linelines of credit. The weighted average effective interest rate on our outstanding debt factoring in our interest rate swaps was 5.72% per annum. See Note 6,8, Mortgage Loans Payable, Net, and Note 7, Line9, Lines of Credit and Term Loans,Loan, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
10-K, for a further discussion. We are required by the terms of certain loan documents to meet certain reporting requirementsvarious financial and non-financial covenants, such as leverage ratios, net worth ratios, debt service coverage ratios and fixed charge coverage ratios. As of December 31, 2020,2023, we were in compliance with all such covenants and requirements on our mortgage loans payable and our linelines of credit and term loans. As of December 31, 2020,loan. If any future covenants are violated, we anticipate seeking a waiver or amending the weighted average effective interest rate on our outstanding debt factoring in our fixed-rate interest rate swaps, was 3.38% per annum.
Contractual Obligations
The following table provides informationcovenants with respect to: (i) the maturitylenders when and scheduled principal repayment of our secured mortgage loans payable and our line of credit and term loans; (ii) interest payments on our mortgage loans payable and our line of credit and term loans; and (iii) ground lease obligations as of December 31, 2020:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Payments Due by Period |
| | 2021 | | 2022-2023 | | 2024-2025 | | Thereafter | | Total |
| Principal payments — fixed-rate debt | $ | 607,000 | | | $ | 1,331,000 | | | $ | 6,589,000 | | | $ | 10,239,000 | | | $ | 18,766,000 | |
| Interest payments — fixed-rate debt | 729,000 | | | 1,370,000 | | | 1,113,000 | | | 4,969,000 | | | 8,181,000 | |
| Principal payments — variable-rate debt | 476,900,000 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 476,900,000 | |
| Interest payments — variable-rate debt (based on rates in effect as of December 31, 2020) | 9,410,000 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 9,410,000 | |
| Ground lease obligations | 523,000 | | | 1,056,000 | | | 1,072,000 | | | 46,565,000 | | | 49,216,000 | |
| Total | $ | 488,169,000 | | | $ | 3,757,000 | | | $ | 8,774,000 | | | $ | 61,773,000 | | | $ | 562,473,000 | |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2020, we hadif such event should occur. However, there can be no off-balance sheet transactions, nor do we currently have any such arrangements or obligations.
Inflation
During the year ended December 31, 2020, inflation has not significantly affected our operations because of the moderate inflation rate; however, we expect to be exposed to inflation risk as income from future long-term tenant leasesassurances that management will be the primary source of our cash flows from operations. There are provisions in the majority of our tenant leases that will protect us from the impact of inflation. These provisions include negotiated rental increases, reimbursement billings for operating expense pass-through charges, and real estate tax and insurance reimbursements. However, dueable to the long-term nature of the anticipated leases, among other factors, the leases may not re-set frequently enough to cover inflation.effectively achieve such plans.
Related Party Transactions
For a discussion of related party transactions, see Note 13,14, Related Party Transactions, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Funds from Operations and ModifiedNormalized Funds from Operations
Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, an industry trade group, has promulgated a measure known as funds from operations, a non-GAAP financial measure, which we believe to be an appropriate supplemental performance measure to reflect the operating performance of a REIT. The use of funds from operations is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure, and our management uses funds from operations attributable to controlling interest, or FFO to evaluate our performance over time. FFO is not equivalent to our net income (loss) as determined under GAAP.
We define FFO, a non-GAAP financial measure, consistent with the standards established by the White Paper on funds from operations approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT, or the White Paper. The White Paper defines funds from operations as net income (loss) computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of certain real estate assets, gains or losses upon consolidation of a previously held equity interest and impairment writedowns of certain real estate assets and investments, plus depreciation and amortization related to real estate, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. While impairment charges are excluded from the calculation of FFO as described above, investors are cautioned that impairments are based on estimated future undiscounted cash flows. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect funds from operations. Our FFO calculation complies with NAREIT’s policy described above.
Historical accounting for real estate involves the use of GAAP. Any other method of accounting for real estate such as the fair value method cannot be construed to be any more accurate or relevant than the comparable methodologies of real estate valuation found in GAAP. Nevertheless, we believe that the use of FFO, which excludes the impact of real estate-related depreciation and amortization and impairments, provides a further understanding of our operating performance to investors, industry analysts and to our management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income (loss).
However,We define normalized FFO and modified funds from operations attributable to controlling interest, or MFFO,Normalized FFO, as described below, should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income (loss) or in its applicability in evaluating our operating performance. The method utilized to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operational performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP FFO and MFFO measures and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO.
The IPA, an industry trade group, has standardized a measure known as modified funds from operations, which the IPA has recommended as a supplemental performance measure for publicly registered, non-listed REITs and which we believe to be another appropriate supplemental performance measure to reflect the operating performance of a publicly registered, non-listed REIT having the characteristics described above. MFFO is not equivalent to our net income (loss) as determined under GAAP, and MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to operate with a limited life and targeted exit strategy, as currently intended. We believe that, because MFFO excludes expensed acquisition fees and expenses that affect our operations only in periods in which properties are acquired and that we consider more reflective of investing activities, as well as other non-operating items included in FFO, MFFO can provide, on a going forward basis, an indication of the sustainability (that is, the capacity to continue to be maintained) of our operating performance after the period in which we are acquiring our properties and once our portfolio is in place. By providing MFFO, we believe we are presenting useful information that assists investors and analysts to better assess the sustainability of our operating performance after our initial offering stage has been completed and our properties have been acquired. We also believe that MFFO is a recognized measure of sustainable operating performance by the publicly registered, non-listed REIT industry. Further, we believe MFFO is useful in comparing the sustainability of our operating performance after our initial offering stage and acquisitions are completed with the sustainability of the operating performance of other real estate companies that are not as involved in acquisition activities. Investors are cautioned that MFFO should only be used to assess the sustainability of our operating performance after our initial offering stage has been completed and properties have been acquired, as it excludes expensed acquisition fees and expenses that have a negative effect on our operating performance during the periods in which properties are acquired.
We define MFFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the Practice Guideline issued by the IPA. The Practice Guideline defines modified funds from operations as funds from operations further adjusted for the following items included in the determination of GAAP net income (loss): expensed acquisition fees and costs;costs, which we refer to as business acquisition expenses; amounts relating to changes in deferred rent and amortization of above- and below-market leasesleases; the non-cash impact of changes to our equity instruments; non-cash or non-recurring income or expense; the non-cash effect of income tax benefits or expenses; capitalized interest; impairment of intangible assets and liabilities (which are adjusted in order to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to closer to an expected to be received cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments); accretion of discounts andgoodwill; amortization of premiumsclosing costs on debt security investments; mark-to-market adjustments included in net income (loss); gains or losses included in net income (loss) from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan; unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting; and after adjustments for consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, with such adjustments calculated to reflect modified funds from operationsNormalized FFO on the same basis. Our MFFO calculation complies with the IPA’s Practice Guideline described above.
Our management uses MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it in order to evaluate our performance against other publicly registered, non-listed REITs which intend to have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies shortly thereafter. As noted above, MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance if we do not continue to operate in this manner. We believe that our use of MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it allow us to present our performance in a manner that reflects certain characteristics that are unique to publicly registered, non-listed REITs, such as their limited life, limited and defined acquisition period and targeted exit strategy, and hence, that the use of such measures may be useful to investors.
Presentation of this information is intended to provide useful information to investors as they compare the operating performance of different REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate funds from operations and modified funds from operations the same way, so comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore,However, FFO and MFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs andNormalized FFO should not be considered as an alternativeconstrued to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income (loss) as an indicationindicator of our operating performance, as an alternative toGAAP cash flows from operations which isas an indicationindicator of our liquidity or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operational performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP FFO and MFFONormalized FFO measures and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and Normalized FFO.
Presentation of this information is intended to provide useful information to investors, industry analysts and management as they compare the operating performance used by the REIT industry, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate funds from operations and normalized funds from operations the same way, so comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. FFO and Normalized FFO should be reviewed in conjunction with other measurements as an indication of our performance. MFFO may be useful in assisting management and investors in assessing the sustainability
None of operating performance in future operating periods, and in particular, after the offering and acquisition stages are complete. FFO and MFFO are not useful measures in evaluating net asset value because impairments are taken into account in determining net asset value but not in determining FFO and MFFO.
Neither the SEC, NAREIT noror any other regulatory body has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments that we use to calculate FFO or MFFO.Normalized FFO. In the future, the SEC, NAREIT or another regulatory body may decide to standardize the allowable adjustments across the publicly registered, non-listed REIT industry and we would have to adjust our calculation and characterization of FFO or MFFO.Normalized FFO.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized government grants through economic stimulus programs
Table of the CARES Act as grant income and within income or loss from an unconsolidated entity. Such amounts were established for eligible healthcare providers to preserve liquidity in response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. See the “Results of Operations” section above for a further discussion. The government grants helped mitigate some of the negative impact that the COVID-19 pandemic had on our financial condition and results of operations. Without such relief proceeds, the COVID-19 pandemic impact would have had a material adverse impact to our FFO and MFFO. For the year ended December 31, 2020, FFO would have been approximately $34,124,000, excluding government grants recognized. For the year ended December 31, 2020, MFFO would have been approximately $31,054,000, excluding government grants recognized.Contents The following is a reconciliation of net income or loss, which is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to FFO and MFFONormalized FFO for the periods presented below:below (in thousands except for share and per share amounts):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Net (loss) income | $ | (18,942,000) | | | $ | (18,851,000) | | | $ | (8,586,000) | | | $ | 508,000 | | | $ | (5,474,000) | |
| Add: | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization related to real estate — consolidated properties | 50,304,000 | | | 45,626,000 | | | 32,658,000 | | | 13,639,000 | | | 1,252,000 | |
| Depreciation and amortization related to real estate — unconsolidated entity | 3,517,000 | | | 3,365,000 | | | 891,000 | | | — | | | — | |
| Impairment of real estate investments — consolidated properties | 3,642,000 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | |
| Impairments and gain on disposition of real estate investments, net — unconsolidated entity | 78,000 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | 885,000 | | | 82,000 | | | 232,000 | | | 33,000 | | | — | |
| Less: | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation, amortization and impairments — noncontrolling interests | (980,000) | | | (113,000) | | | (272,000) | | | (46,000) | | | — | |
| FFO attributable to controlling interest | $ | 38,504,000 | | | $ | 30,109,000 | | | $ | 24,923,000 | | | $ | 14,134,000 | | | $ | (4,222,000) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisition related expenses(1) | $ | (160,000) | | | $ | 1,974,000 | | | $ | 2,795,000 | | | $ | 655,000 | | | $ | 4,745,000 | |
| Amortization of above- and below-market leases(2) | 132,000 | | | (207,000) | | | (165,000) | | | (143,000) | | | (29,000) | |
| Change in deferred rent(3) | (4,207,000) | | | (2,925,000) | | | (3,029,000) | | | (1,705,000) | | | (207,000) | |
| Loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments(4) | 870,000 | | | 4,385,000 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Adjustments for unconsolidated entity(5) | 301,000 | | | 486,000 | | | 99,000 | | | — | | | — | |
| Adjustments for noncontrolling interests(5) | (6,000) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| MFFO attributable to controlling interest | $ | 35,434,000 | | | $ | 33,822,000 | | | $ | 24,623,000 | | | $ | 12,941,000 | | | $ | 287,000 | |
| Weighted average Class T and Class I common shares outstanding — basic and diluted | 80,661,645 | | | 78,396,077 | | | 54,847,197 | | | 27,754,701 | | | 3,131,466 | |
| Net (loss) income per Class T and Class I common share — basic and diluted | $ | (0.23) | | | $ | (0.24) | | | $ | (0.16) | | | $ | 0.02 | | | $ | (1.75) | |
| FFO attributable to controlling interest per Class T and Class I common share — basic and diluted | $ | 0.48 | | | $ | 0.38 | | | $ | 0.45 | | | $ | 0.51 | | | $ | (1.35) | |
| MFFO attributable to controlling interest per Class T and Class I common share — basic and diluted | $ | 0.44 | | | $ | 0.43 | | | $ | 0.45 | | | $ | 0.47 | | | $ | 0.09 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | | | | | |
| Net loss | $ | (76,887) | | | $ | (73,383) | | | $ | (53,269) | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization related to real estate — consolidated properties | 182,452 | | | 167,860 | | | 133,191 | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization related to real estate — unconsolidated entities | 401 | | | 1,102 | | | 3,116 | | | | | | | |
| Impairment of real estate investments — consolidated properties | 13,899 | | | 54,579 | | | 3,335 | | | | | | | |
| (Gain) loss on dispositions of real estate investments, net — consolidated properties | (32,472) | | | (5,481) | | | 100 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 5,418 | | | (7,919) | | | 5,475 | | | | | | | |
| Gain on re-measurement of previously held equity interests | (726) | | | (19,567) | | | — | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation, amortization, impairments, net gain/loss on dispositions and gain on re-measurements — noncontrolling interests | (26,518) | | | (22,614) | | | (22,270) | | | | | | | |
| NAREIT FFO attributable to controlling interest | $ | 65,567 | | | $ | 94,577 | | | $ | 69,678 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Business acquisition expenses | $ | 5,795 | | | $ | 4,388 | | | $ | 13,022 | | | | | | | |
| Amortization of above- and below-market leases | 9,744 | | | 2,596 | | | 953 | | | | | | | |
| Amortization of closing costs — debt security investments | 278 | | | 237 | | | 201 | | | | | | | |
| Change in deferred rent | 1,149 | | | (3,355) | | | (20) | | | | | | | |
| Non-cash impact of changes to equity instruments | 5,621 | | | 3,909 | | | 1,008 | | | | | | | |
| Capitalized interest | (163) | | | (150) | | | (628) | | | | | | | |
| Loss on debt extinguishments | 345 | | | 5,166 | | | 2,655 | | | | | | | |
| Loss (gain) in fair value of derivative financial instruments | 926 | | | (500) | | | (8,200) | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency (gain) loss | (2,307) | | | 5,206 | | | 564 | | | | | | | |
| Impairment of intangible assets and goodwill | 10,520 | | | 23,277 | | | — | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Adjustments for unconsolidated entities | (321) | | | 113 | | | 573 | | | | | | | |
| Adjustments for noncontrolling interests | (4,786) | | | (3,530) | | | (1,653) | | | | | | | |
| Normalized FFO attributable to controlling interest | $ | 92,368 | | | $ | 131,934 | | | $ | 78,153 | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average Class T and Class I common shares outstanding — basic and diluted | 66,047,114 | | | 65,807,868 | | | 50,081,140 | | | | | | | |
| Net loss per Class T and Class I common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted | $ | (1.08) | | | $ | (1.24) | | | $ | (0.95) | | | | | | | |
| NAREIT FFO per Class T and Class I common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted | $ | 0.99 | | | $ | 1.44 | | | $ | 1.39 | | | | | | | |
| Normalized FFO per Class T and Class I common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted | $ | 1.40 | | | $ | 2.00 | | | $ | 1.56 | | | | | | | |
_________
(1)In evaluating investments in real estate, we differentiate the costs to acquire the investment from the operations derived from the investment. Such information would be comparable only for publicly registered, non-listed REITs that have completed their acquisition activity and have other similar operating characteristics. By excluding expensed acquisition related expenses, we believe MFFO provides useful supplemental information that is comparable for each type of real estate investment and is consistent with management’s analysis of the investing and operating performance of our properties. Acquisition fees and expenses include payments to our advisor or its affiliates and third parties.
(2)Under GAAP, above- and below-market leases are assumed to diminish predictably in value over time and amortized, similar to depreciation and amortization of other real estate-related assets that are excluded from FFO. However, because real estate values and market lease rates historically rise or fall with market conditions, including inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, we believe that by excluding charges relating to the amortization of above- and below-market leases, MFFO may provide useful supplemental information on the performance of the real estate.
(3)Under GAAP, as a lessor, rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related lease (including rent holidays). As a lessee, we record amortization of right-of-use assets and accretion of lease liabilities for our operating leases. This may result in income or expense recognition that is significantly different than the underlying contract terms. By adjusting for such amounts, MFFO may provide useful supplemental information on the realized economic impact of lease terms, providing insight on the expected contractual cash flows of such lease terms, and aligns results with management’s analysis of operating performance.
(4)Under GAAP, we are required to include changes in fair value of our derivative financial instruments in the determination of net income or loss. We believe that adjusting for the change in fair value of our derivative financial instruments to arrive at MFFO is appropriate because such adjustments may not be reflective of on-going operations and reflect unrealized impacts on value based only on then current market conditions, although they may be based upon general market conditions. The need to reflect the change in fair value of our derivative financial instruments is a continuous process and is analyzed on a quarterly basis in accordance with GAAP.
(5)Includes all adjustments to eliminate the unconsolidated entity’s share or noncontrolling interests’ share, as applicable, of the adjustments described in notes (1) – (4) above to convert our FFO to MFFO.
Net Operating Income
Net operating income, or NOI, is a non-GAAP financial measure that is defined as net income (loss), computed in accordance with GAAP, generated from properties before general and administrative expenses, business acquisition related expenses, depreciation and amortization, interest expense, gain or loss on dispositions, impairment of real estate investments, impairment of intangible assets and goodwill, income or loss from unconsolidated entity,entities, gain on re-measurement of previously held equity interests, foreign currency gain or loss, other income and income tax benefit or expense.
NOI is not equivalent to our net income (loss) as determined under GAAP and may not be a useful measure in measuring operational income or cash flows. Furthermore, NOI should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) as an indication of our operating performance or as an alternative to cash flows from operations as an indication of our liquidity, or indicative of cash flow available to fund our cash needs including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.liquidity. NOI should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income (loss) or. NOI should be reviewed in its applicability in evaluatingconjunction with other measurements as an indication of our operating performance. Investors are also cautioned that NOI should only be used to assess our operational performance in periods in which we have not incurred or accrued any business acquisition related expenses.
We believe that NOI is an appropriate supplemental performance measure to reflect the performance of our operating assets because NOI excludes certain items that are not associated with the operations of the properties. We believe that NOI is a widely accepted measure of comparative operating performance in the real estate community. However, our use of the term NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies as they may have different methodologies for computing this amount.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized government grants through economic stimulus programs of the CARES Act as grant income. The government grants helped mitigate some of the negative impact that the COVID-19 pandemic had on our financial condition and results of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2020, NOI would have been approximately $70,440,000, excluding government grants recognized.
To facilitate understanding of this financial measure, the following is a reconciliation of net income or loss, which is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to NOI for the periods presented
below:below (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | | | | | |
| Net loss | $ | (76,887) | | | $ | (73,383) | | | $ | (53,269) | | | | | | | |
| General and administrative | 47,510 | | | 43,418 | | | 43,199 | | | | | | | |
| Business acquisition expenses | 5,795 | | | 4,388 | | | 13,022 | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 182,604 | | | 167,957 | | | 133,191 | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | 164,117 | | | 105,456 | | | 72,737 | | | | | | | |
| (Gain) loss on dispositions of real estate investments, net | (32,472) | | | (5,481) | | | 100 | | | | | | | |
| Impairment of real estate investments | 13,899 | | | 54,579 | | | 3,335 | | | | | | | |
| Impairment of intangible assets and goodwill | 10,520 | | | 23,277 | | | — | | | | | | | |
| Loss (income) from unconsolidated entities | 1,718 | | | (1,407) | | | 1,355 | | | | | | | |
| Gain on re-measurement of previously held equity interests | (726) | | | (19,567) | | | — | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency (gain) loss | (2,307) | | | 5,206 | | | 564 | | | | | | | |
| Other income | (7,601) | | | (3,064) | | | (1,854) | | | | | | | |
| Income tax expense | 663 | | | 586 | | | 956 | | | | | | | |
| Net operating income | $ | 306,833 | | | $ | 301,965 | | | $ | 213,336 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Net (loss) income | $ | (18,942,000) | | | $ | (18,851,000) | | | $ | (8,586,000) | | | $ | 508,000 | | | $ | (5,474,000) | |
| General and administrative | 16,691,000 | | | 15,235,000 | | | 9,172,000 | | | 4,338,000 | | | 1,221,000 | |
| Acquisition related expenses | (160,000) | | | 1,974,000 | | | 2,795,000 | | | 655,000 | | | 4,745,000 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 50,304,000 | | | 45,626,000 | | | 32,658,000 | | | 13,639,000 | | | 1,252,000 | |
| Interest expense | 20,825,000 | | | 20,576,000 | | | 6,788,000 | | | 2,699,000 | | | 514,000 | |
| Impairment of real estate investments | 3,642,000 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| (Income) loss from unconsolidated entity | (629,000) | | | (267,000) | | | 110,000 | | | — | | | — | |
| Other income | (286,000) | | | (175,000) | | | (11,000) | | | (1,000) | | | — | |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | — | | | (8,000) | | | 8,000 | | | — | | | — | |
| Net operating income | $ | 71,445,000 | | | $ | 64,110,000 | | | $ | 42,934,000 | | | $ | 21,838,000 | | | $ | 2,258,000 | |
For a discussion of subsequent events, see Note 21, Subsequent Events, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. In pursuing our business plan, we expect that the primary market risk to which we will be exposed is interest rate risk. There were no material changes in our market risk exposures, or in the methods we use to manage market risk, between the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023 and 2018.2022.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to the effects of interest rate changes primarily as a result of long-term debt used to acquire and develop properties and other permitted investments. Our interest rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changesincreases on earnings, prepayment penalties and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs while taking into account variable interest rate risk. To achieve our objectives, we may borrow or lend at fixed or variable rates.
We have entered into, and may continue to enter into, derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate swaps and interest rate caps, in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. We dohave not elected, and may continue to not elect, to apply hedge accounting treatment to these derivatives; therefore, changes in the fair value of interest rate derivative financial instruments arewere recorded as a component of interest expense in gain or loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.operations and comprehensive loss. As of December 31, 2020,2023, our interest rate swap liabilitiesswaps are recorded in other assets and other liabilities in our accompanying consolidated balance sheetssheet at their aggregate fair value of $5,255,000.$1,463,000 and ($2,389,000), respectively. We willdo not enter into derivatives or interest ratederivative transactions for speculative purposes.
In July 2017, As of December 31, 2022, we did not have any derivative financial instruments. See Note 10, Derivative Financial Instruments, and Note 15, Fair Value Measurements, to the Consolidated Financial Conduct Authority, or FCA,Statements that regulates the London Inter-bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, announced its intention to stop compelling banks to submit ratesare a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. As a result, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York organized the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, which identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR, as its preferred alternative to United States dollar LIBOR in derivatives and other financial contracts. We are not able to predict when LIBOR will cease to be available or when there will be sufficient liquidity in the SOFR markets. Any changes adopted by the FCA or other governing bodies in the method used for determining LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR. If that were to occur,further discussion on our interest payments could change. In addition, uncertainty about the extent and manner of future changes may result in interest rates and/or payments that are higher or lower than if LIBOR were to remain available in its current form.
We have variable rate debt outstanding under our credit facilities and derivative financial instruments maturing on November 19, 2021 that are indexed to LIBOR. As such, we are monitoring and evaluating the related risks of the discontinuation of LIBOR, which include possible changes to the interest on loans or amounts received and paid on derivative instruments. These risks arise in connection with transitioning contracts to a new alternative rate, including any resulting value transfer that may occur. The value of loans or derivative instruments tied to LIBOR could also be impacted if LIBOR is limited or discontinued. For some instruments, the method of transitioning to an alternative rate may be challenging, as they may require negotiation with the respective counterparty. If a contract is not transitioned to an alternative rate and LIBOR is discontinued, the impact on our contracts is likely to vary. If LIBOR is discontinued or if the methods of calculating LIBOR change from their current form, interest rates on our current or future indebtedness may be adversely affected. While we expect LIBOR to be available in substantially its current form until the end of 2021, it is possible that LIBOR will become unavailableswaps.
prior to that point. This could result, for example, if a sufficient number of banks decline to make submissions to the LIBOR administrator. In that case, the risks associated with the transition to an alternative reference rate will be accelerated and magnified.
As of December 31, 2020,2023, the table below presents the principal amounts and weighted average interest rates by year of expected maturity to evaluate the expected cash flows and sensitivity to interest rate changes.changes, excluding the effect of our interest rate swap (dollars in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Expected Maturity Date |
| | 2024 | | 2025 | | 2026 | | 2027 | | 2028 | | Thereafter | | Total | | Fair Value |
| Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Debt security held-to-maturity | $ | — | | | $ | 93,433 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 93,433 | | | $ | 93,304 | |
| Weighted average interest rate on maturing fixed-rate debt security | — | % | | 4.24 | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | 4.24 | % | | — | |
| Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fixed-rate debt — principal payments | $ | 48,168 | | | $ | 136,701 | | | $ | 156,379 | | | $ | 49,998 | | | $ | 16,234 | | | $ | 582,845 | | | $ | 990,325 | | | $ | 846,985 | |
| Weighted average interest rate on maturing fixed-rate debt | 3.56 | % | | 4.30 | % | | 3.00 | % | | 3.43 | % | | 3.25 | % | | 3.59 | % | | 3.58 | % | | — | |
| Variable-rate debt — principal payments | $ | 263,277 | | | $ | 339,975 | | | $ | 379,953 | | | $ | 550,177 | | | $ | 187 | | | $ | 27,142 | | | $ | 1,560,711 | | | $ | 1,564,165 | |
| Weighted average interest rate on maturing variable-rate debt (based on rates in effect as of December 31, 2023) | 8.11 | % | | 8.16 | % | | 7.15 | % | | 7.05 | % | | 7.61 | % | | 7.60 | % | | 7.50 | % | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Expected Maturity Date |
| | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2024 | | 2025 | | Thereafter | | Total | | Fair Value |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fixed-rate debt — principal payments | $ | 607,000 | | | $ | 651,000 | | | $ | 680,000 | | | $ | 711,000 | | | $ | 5,878,000 | | | $ | 10,239,000 | | | $ | 18,766,000 | | | $ | 22,052,000 | |
| Weighted average interest rate on maturing fixed-rate debt | 4.60 | % | | 4.49 | % | | 4.49 | % | | 4.50 | % | | 3.85 | % | | 3.83 | % | | 3.93 | % | | — | |
| Variable-rate debt — principal payments | $ | 476,900,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 476,900,000 | | | $ | 477,651,000 | |
| Weighted average interest rate on maturing variable-rate debt (based on rates in effect as of December 31, 2020) | 2.12 | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | 2.12 | % | | — | |
As of December 31, 2023, the net carrying value of our debt security investment was $86,935,000. As we expect to hold our debt security investment to maturity and the amounts due under such debt security investment are limited to the outstanding principal balance and any accrued and unpaid interest, we do not expect that fluctuations in interest rates, and the resulting change in fair value of our debt security investment, would have a significant impact on our operations. See Note 15, Fair Value Measurements, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a discussion of the fair value of our investment in a held-to-maturity debt security. The effective interest rate on our debt security investment was 4.24% per annum as of December 31, 2023.
Mortgage Loans Payable, Net and LineLines of Credit and Term LoansLoan
Mortgage loans payable was $18,766,000were $1,326,313,000 ($17,827,000,1,302,396,000, net of discount/premium and deferred financing costs) as of December 31, 2020.2023. As of December 31, 2020,2023, we had three76 fixed-rate mortgage loans payable and 13 variable-rate mortgage loans payable with effective interest rates ranging from 3.67%2.21% to 5.25%8.46% per annum.annum and a weighted average effective interest rate of 4.72%. In addition, as of December 31, 2020,2023, we had $476,900,000$1,224,723,000 ($1,223,967,000, net of deferred financing fees) outstanding under our linelines of credit and term loansloan, at a weighted-average interest rate of 2.12%7.36% per annum.
As of December 31, 2020,2023, the weighted average effective interest rate on our outstanding debt, factoring in our fixed-rate interest rate swaps, was 3.38%5.72% per annum. An increase in the variable interest rate on our variable-rate linemortgage loans payable and lines of credit and term loansloan constitutes a market risk. As of December 31, 2020,2023, a 0.50% increase in the market rates of interest would have increased our overall annualized interest expense on all of our other variable-rate linemortgage loans payable and lines of credit and term loans by $922,000,$5,124,000, or 5.13%3.48% of total annualized interest expense on our mortgage loans payable and our linelines of credit and term loans.loan. See Note 6,8, Mortgage Loans Payable, Net, and Note 7, Line9, Lines of Credit and Term Loans,Loan, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion.
Other Market Risk
In addition to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, the value of our future investments is subject to fluctuations based on changes in local and regional economic conditions and changes in the creditworthiness of tenants and residents, which may affect our ability to refinance our debt if necessary.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
See the index at Part IV, Item 15, Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to us, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours are designed to do, and we necessarily wereare required to apply our judgment in evaluating whether the benefits of the controls and procedures that we adopt outweigh their costs.
As required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, an evaluation as of December 31, 20202023 was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as of December 31, 2020,2023, were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision, and with the participation, of our management, including our chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and chief financial officer,Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued in 2013 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on our evaluation under the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued in 2013, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2020.2023.
(c) Changes in internal control over financial reporting.There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20202023 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.
N/A.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table and biographical descriptions set forth certain information with respect to the individuals who are our executive officers and directors:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Age* | | Position |
Jeffrey T. Hanson | | 50Danny Prosky | | 58 | | Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Danny Prosky | | 55 | | President, Chief Operating OfficerDirector |
| Brian S. Peay | | 5558 | | Chief Financial Officer |
Mathieu B. Streiff | | 45Gabriel M. Willhite | | 43 | | Chief Operating Officer |
| Stefan K.L. Oh | | 53 | | Chief Investment Officer |
| Mark E. Foster | | 51 | | Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
Stefan K. L. Oh | | 50Jeffrey T. Hanson | | 53 | | Executive Vice President — AcquisitionsNon-Executive Chairman of the Board |
Cora Lo | | 46Mathieu B. Streiff | | 48 | | Secretary and Assistant General CounselDirector |
| Scott A. Estes | | 53 | | Independent Director |
| Brian J. Flornes | | 5760 | | Independent Director |
| Dianne Hurley | | 5861 | | Independent Director |
Wilbur H. Smith III | | 48 | | Independent Director |
Richard S. WelchMarvin R. O’Quinn | | 5072 | | Independent Director |
| Valerie Richardson | | 65 | | Independent Director |
| Wilbur H. Smith III | | 51 | | Independent Director |
____________________
*As of March 26, 202122, 2024
Jeffrey T. Hanson Danny Proskyhas served as our Chief Executive Officer, and Chairmanas a member of theour board, since October 2021, and has served as our President since January 2015. Mr. Prosky previously served as our Chief Operating Officer from January 2015 to October 2021 and our Interim Chief Financial Officer from October 2015 to June 2016. He iswas also one of the founders and owners of AHI Group Holdings, LLC, or AHI Group Holdings, an investment management firm that ownsHoldings. Mr. Prosky was a 47.1% controlling interest in American Healthcare Investors. Since December 2014, Mr. Hanson has alsofounding principal, and served as Managing Director, of American Healthcare Investors, which serves as one of our co-sponsors and indirectly owns a majority interest in Griffin-American Healthcare REIT Advisor IV, LLC, or our advisor.AHI from December 2014 until October 2021. Mr. HansonProsky has also served as President and Chief ExecutiveOperating Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of GA Healthcare REITGAHR III sincefrom January 2013 until October 2021, as its Interim Chief Financial Officer from August 2015 to June 2016, and as one of its directors from December 2014 until October 2021. Mr. Prosky previously served as President, Chief ExecutiveOperating Officer and Chairmana director of the Board of Directors of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc., or GA Healthcare REITGAHR II from January 2009 to December 2014. He also served2014 and as Executive Vice President of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT Sub-Advisor, LLC, or Griffin-American Healthcare REIT Advisor, from November 2011 to December 2014. He served as the President and Chief ExecutiveOperating Officer of Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT Advisor, LLC, or Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT Advisor, from January 2009 to November 2011 and as Executive Vice President and Secretary of Grubb & Ellis Equity Advisors Property Management, Inc. from June 2011 to November 2011. He also served as the Chief Executive Officer andVice President, Healthcare Real Estate of Grubb & Ellis Equity Advisors, LLC, or Grubb & Ellis Equity Advisors, from September 2009 to November 2011, having served as Executive Vice President, Healthcare Real Estate and Managing Director, Healthcare Properties of several investment management subsidiaries within the Grubb & Ellis organization from March 2006 to November 2011, and was responsible for all medical property acquisitions, management and dispositions. He served as the Executive Vice President — Acquisitions of Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT, Inc., which became known as Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. in August 2009 and subsequently as Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated in July 2022, from April 2008 to June 2009, having served as its Vice President — Acquisitions from September 2006 to April 2008. Mr. Prosky previously worked for HCP, Inc., which is now known as Healthpeak Properties, Inc. (NYSE: DOC), a publicly traded healthcare REIT, where he served as the Assistant Vice President — Acquisitions & Dispositions from February 2005 to March 2006 and as Assistant Vice President — Asset Management from November 1999 to February 2005. From 1992 to 1999, he served as the Manager, Financial Operations, Multi-Tenant Facilities for American Health Properties, Inc., or American Healthcare Properties. Additionally, since December 2015, Mr. Prosky has also served as a member of the board of directors of Trilogy. Mr. Prosky received a B.S. degree in Finance from the University of Colorado and an M.S. degree in Management from Boston University
Our board selected Mr. Prosky to serve as a director because he is our Chief Executive Officer and President and his primary focus has been on the acquisition and operation of healthcare and healthcare-related properties. He has significant knowledge of, and relationships within, the real estate and healthcare industries, due in part to the 14 years he worked at PEAK and American Health Properties. Our board believes that his executive experience in the real estate industry coupled with his deep knowledge of our company’s strategies and operations bring strong financial and operational expertise to our board.
Brian S. Peay has served our Chief Financial Officer since June 2016. He also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AHI and as Chief Financial Officer of GAHR III from June 2016 until October 2021. Mr. Peay served as Chief Financial Officer of Veritas Investments, Inc., located in San Francisco, California, one of the largest owners and operators of rent-controlled apartments in the San Francisco Bay Area, from September 2015 to May 2016, where he was responsible for the financial planning, corporate budgeting, tax structuring and management of the accounting function of the company. Mr. Peay previously served as Vice President Finance & Sales Ops of MobileIron, Inc., located in Mountain View, California, a leader in security and management for mobile devices, applications and documents, from October 2013 to September 2015. Mr. Peay served as Chief Financial Officer of Glenborough, LLC from November 2005 to March 2012, and prior to its purchase by Morgan Stanley Real Estate Fund V, Mr. Peay also previously served in executive capacities including Chief Financial Officer, SVP — Joint Ventures (Business Development), Chief Accounting Officer and VP Finance with Glenborough Realty Trust, Inc., a real estate investment and management company focused on the acquisition, management and leasing of high quality commercial properties in major markets across the country, from November 1997 to November 2005, where he was responsible for the finance, accounting and reporting, risk management, information technology and human resource functions of the company. Prior to Glenborough Realty Trust, Inc., Mr. Peay served as Chief Financial Officer & Director of Research at Cliffwood Partners, L.P. from August 1995 to November 1997. Mr. Peay also served as Manager at Kenneth Leventhal & Co., a certified public accounting firm specializing in real estate that subsequently merged with Ernst & Young LLP, from August 1988 to August 1995. Mr. Peay received a B.S. degree in Business Economics from the University of California, Santa Barbara. Mr. Peay became a Certified Public Accountant in the State of California in 1992; his current status is not practicing.
Gabriel M. Willhite has served as our Chief Operating Officer since August 2022. Prior to that, he served as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel from October 2021 until August 2022 and Assistant General Counsel — Transactions from January 2020 until October 2021. He also served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel of AHI from January 2020 until October 2021 and prior to that served as Senior Vice President, Assistant General Counsel — Transactions of AHI since April 2016. Mr. Willhite also served as Assistant General Counsel — Transactions of GAHR III from January 2020 until October 2021. From November 2012 until April 2016, Mr. Willhite served as Legal Counsel for Sabal Financial Group, L.P., a real estate and finance company based in Newport Beach, California which was a subsidiary of Oaktree Capital Management, where he was responsible for overseeing portfolio acquisitions, financings, joint ventures, dispositions and strategic workout transactions. Prior to joining Sabal Financial Group, Mr. Willhite was an associate in the transactional practice group of Greenberg Traurig, LLP in Irvine, California. Additionally, since October 2020, Mr. Willhite has also served as a member of the board of directors of Trilogy, and as its chairman since August 2023. Mr. Willhite received a B.A. degree in Political Science and Communication from the University of Southern California and a J.D. degree from University of Minnesota Law School. He is a member of the California State Bar Association.
Stefan K.L. Oh has served as our Chief Investment Officer since March 2023, having previously served as our Executive Vice President, Head of Acquisitions from October 2021 to March 2023, as our Executive Vice President of Acquisitions from October 2015 to October 2021, and as our Senior Vice President of Acquisitions from January 2015 to October 2015. Mr. Oh also served as Executive Vice President, Acquisitions of GAHR III from October 2015 to October 2021, having previously served as its Senior Vice President, Acquisitions since January 2013. Mr. Oh has also served as Executive Vice President, Acquisitions of AHI from October 2015 to October 2021, having previously served as its Senior Vice President, Acquisitions since December 2014. Mr. Oh also served as Senior Vice President — Acquisitions of GAHR II from January 2009 to December 2014 and as Senior Vice President, Acquisitions of AHI Group Holdings from January 2012 to December 2014. Mr. Oh served as the Senior Vice President, Healthcare Real Estate of Grubb & Ellis Equity Advisors from January 2010 to January 2012, having served in the same capacity for Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors since June 2007, where he had been responsible for the acquisition and management of healthcare real estate. Prior to joining Grubb & Ellis, from August 1999 to June 2007, Mr. Oh worked for PEAK, where he served as Director of Asset Management and later as Director of Acquisitions. From 1997 to 1999, he worked as an auditor and project manager for Ernst & Young AB in Stockholm, Sweden and from 1993 to 1997 as an auditor within Ernst & Young LLP’s EYKL Real Estate Group in Los Angeles, California. Mr. Oh received a B.S. degree in Accounting from Pepperdine University and is a Certified Public Accountant in the State of California (inactive).
Mark E. Foster has served as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel since August 2022. Prior to that, Mr. Foster was a partner in the commercial real estate practice group at Snell & Wilmer, L.L.P., located in Costa Mesa, California from September 2016 until July 2022. From June 2012 until September 2016, Mr. Foster served as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary to Sabal Financial Group, L.P. based in Newport Beach, California, which was a subsidiary of
Oaktree Capital Management, where he was responsible for all legal matters related to the company’s management of over $6 billion in real estate and debt assets. Prior to Sabal, from January 2008 until June 2012, Mr. Foster served as Senior Counsel for Rockefeller Group Development Corporation, located in Irvine, California, where he focused on all aspects of commercial real estate acquisition, development and operations. From June 2003 until December 2007, Mr. Foster served as Regional General Counsel for Toll Brothers, Inc. (NYSE: TOL), located in Irvine, California, where he oversaw the acquisition and development of dozens of residential projects throughout California. Mr. Foster began his legal career in the real estate group at the law firm of Allen Matkins, LLP, located in Irvine, California where he was employed from September 1998 to June 2003. Mr. Foster received a B.A. degree in International Relations, Political Science and Economics from the University of Southern California, and a J.D. degree from the University of Southern California, Gould School of Law.
Jeffrey T. Hanson has served as our non-executive Chairman of the board since June 2022, having previously served as our Executive Chairman of the board since October 2021, and our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board from January 2015 until October 2021. He was also one of the founders and owners of AHI Group Holdings, an investment management firm that owned a controlling interest in AHI, which served as one of our co-sponsors and indirectly owned a majority interest in our former adviser. Mr. Hanson was a founding principal, and served as Managing Director, of AHI from December 2014 until October 2021. Mr. Hanson also served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors of GAHR III, from January 2013 until October 2021, and previously served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors of GAHR II, from January 2009 to December 2014. He also served as Executive Vice President of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT Advisor from November 2011 to December 2014. He served as the Chief Executive Officer of Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT Advisor from January 2009 to November 2011 and as the Chief Executive Officer and President of Grubb & Ellis Equity Advisors from June 2009 to November 2011. He also served as the President and Chief Investment Officer of Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors, LLC, or Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors, from January 2008 and November 2007, respectively, until November 2011. He also served as the Executive Vice President, Investment Programs, of Grubb & Ellis Company, or Grubb & Ellis, from December 2007 to November 2011 and served as Chief Investment Officer of several investment management subsidiaries within Grubb & Ellis’ organization from July 2006 to November 2011. From 1997 to July 2006, prior to Grubb & Ellis’ merger with NNN Realty Advisors, Inc., or NNN Realty Advisors, in December 2007, Mr. Hanson served as Senior Vice President with Grubb & Ellis’ Institutional Investment Group in the firm’s Newport Beach office. While with that entity, he managed investment sale assignments throughout the Western United States, with a significant focus on leading acquisitions and dispositions on healthcare-related properties, for major private and institutional clients. During that time, he also served as a member of the Grubb & Ellis President’s Counsel and Institutional Investment Group Board of Advisors. Additionally, from December 2015 to November 2016, Mr. Hanson served as a member of the board of directors of Trilogy Investors, LLC, or Trilogy. Mr. Hanson received a B.S. degree in Business from the University of Southern California with an emphasis in Real Estate Finance.
Our board selected Mr. Hanson to serve as a director because he iscurrently serves as our non-executive Chairman of the board, and he previously served as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board for eight years. Mr. Hanson has also served in various executive roles with a focus on property management and property acquisitions.overseeing all aspects of commercial real estate investment activities. Additionally, Mr. Hanson has insight into the development, marketing, finance, operations and operationsmarketing aspects of our company. He has knowledge of the real estate and healthcare industries and relationships with chief executives and other senior management at real estate and healthcare companies. Our board believes that Mr. Hanson brings an important perspectivehis executive experience in the real estate industry coupled with his deep knowledge of our company’s strategies and operations bring strong financial and operational expertise to our board.
Danny Prosky has served as our President and Chief Operating Officer since January 2015. Mr. Prosky also served as our Interim Chief Financial Officer from October 2015 to June 2016. He is also one of the founders and owners of AHI Group Holdings. Since December 2014, Mr. Prosky has also served as Managing Director of American Healthcare Investors. Mr. Prosky has also served as President and Chief Operating Officer of GA Healthcare REIT III since January 2013, as its Interim Chief Financial Officer from August 2015 to June 2016, and as one of its directors since December 2014. Mr. Prosky previously served as President, Chief Operating Officer and a director of GA Healthcare REIT II from January 2009 to December 2014 and as Executive Vice President of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT Advisor from November 2011 to December 2014. He served as the President and Chief Operating Officer of Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT Advisor from January 2009 to November 2011 and as Executive Vice President and Secretary of Grubb & Ellis Equity Advisors Property Management, Inc. from June 2011 to November 2011. He also served as the Executive Vice President, Healthcare Real Estate of Grubb & Ellis Equity Advisors from September 2009 to November 2011, having served as Executive Vice President, Healthcare Real Estate and Managing Director, Healthcare Properties of several investment management subsidiaries within the Grubb & Ellis organization from March 2006 to November 2011, and was responsible for all medical property acquisitions, management and dispositions. He served as the Executive Vice President — Acquisitions of Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT, Inc. (now known as Healthcare Trust of America, Inc.) from April 2008 to June 2009, having served as its Vice President — Acquisitions from September 2006 to April 2008. Mr. Prosky previously worked for HCP, Inc. (now known as Healthpeak Properties, Inc.), or HCP, a publicly traded healthcare REIT, where he served as the Assistant Vice President — Acquisitions & Dispositions from February 2005 to March 2006 and as Assistant Vice President — Asset Management from November 1999 to February 2005. From 1992 to 1999, he served as the Manager, Financial Operations, Multi-Tenant Facilities for American Health Properties, Inc. Additionally, since December 2015, Mr. Prosky has also served as a member of the board of directors of Trilogy. Mr. Prosky received a B.S. degree in Finance from the University of Colorado and an M.S. degree in Management from Boston University.
Brian S. Peay has served as our Chief Financial Officer since June 2016. He has also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of American Healthcare Investors and as Chief Financial Officer of GA Healthcare REIT III since June 2016. Mr. Peay served as Chief Financial Officer of Veritas Investments, Inc., located in San Francisco, California, one of the largest owners and operators of rent-controlled apartments in the San Francisco Bay Area, from September 2015 to May 2016, where he was responsible for the financial planning, corporate budgeting, tax structuring and management of the accounting function of the company. Mr. Peay previously served as Vice President Finance & Sales Ops of MobileIron, Inc., located in Mountain View, California, a leader in security and management for mobile devices, applications and documents, from October 2013 to September 2015. Mr. Peay served as Chief Financial Officer of Glenborough, LLC from November 2006 to March 2012, and prior to its purchase by Morgan Stanley Real Estate Fund V, Mr. Peay also previously served in executive capacities including Chief Financial Officer, SVP — Joint Ventures (Business Development), Chief Accounting Officer and VP Finance with Glenborough Realty Trust, Inc., a real estate investment and management company focused on the acquisition, management and leasing of high quality commercial properties in major markets across the country, from November 1997 to November 2006, where he was responsible for the finance, accounting and reporting, risk management, information technology and human resource functions of the company. Prior to Glenborough Realty Trust, Inc., Mr. Peay served as Chief Financial Officer & Director of Research at Cliffwood Partners, L.P. from August 1995 to November 1997. Mr. Peay also served as Manager at Kenneth Leventhal & Co., a certified public accounting firm specializing in real estate that subsequently merged with Ernst & Young LLP, from August 1988 to August 1995. Mr. Peay received a B.S. degree in Business Economics from the University of California, Santa Barbara. Mr. Peay became a Certified Public Accountant in the State of California in 1992; his current status is not practicing.
Mathieu B. Streiff has served as a member of our board since October 2021. Prior to that, he served as our Executive Vice President from August 2022 until December 2022, and as our Chief Operating Officer from October 2021 until August 2022. Mr. Streiff also served as our Executive Vice President and General Counsel sincefrom January 2015.2015 until October 2021. He iswas also one of the founders and owners of AHI Group Holdings. Mr. Streiff has also was a founding principal and served as Managing Director sincefrom December 2014 until October 2021, and General Counsel from December 2014 to December 2019, of American Healthcare Investors.AHI. He has also served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel of GA Healthcare REITGAHR III sincefrom July 2013 until October 2021, having served as its Executive Vice President from January 2013 to July 2013. Mr. Streiff served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel of GA Healthcare REITGAHR II from September 2013 to December 2014, having served as its Executive Vice President from January 2012 to September 2013. He also has served as Executive Vice President of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT Advisor from November 2011 to December 2014. Mr. Streiff served as General Counsel, Executive Vice President and Secretary of Grubb & Ellis from October 2010 to June 2011. Mr. Streiff joined Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors in March 20062011, after previously serving as the firm’s real estate counsel responsible for structuring and negotiating property acquisitions, financings, joint ventures and disposition transactions. He was promoted to Chief Real Estate Counsel and Senior Vice President, Investment Operations in March 2009 and served in that position until October 2010. In this role, his responsibility was expanded to include the structuring and strategic management of the company’s securitized real estate investment platforms.Operations. From September 2002 until March 2006, Mr. Streiff was an associate in the real estate department of Latham & Watkins LLP in New York, New York. Additionally, since December 2015, Mr. Streiff has also served as a member of the board of directors of Trilogy. Mr. Streiff received a B.S. degree in
Environmental Economics and Policy from the University of California, Berkeley and a J.D. degree from Columbia University Law School. He is a member of the New York State Bar Association.
Stefan K.L. Oh has served as our Executive Vice President of Acquisitions since October 2015, having previously served as our Senior Vice President of Acquisitions since January 2015. Mr. Oh has also served as Executive Vice President, Acquisitions of GA Healthcare REIT III since October 2015, having previously served as its Senior Vice President, Acquisitions since January 2013. Mr. Oh has also served as Executive Vice President, Acquisitions of American Healthcare Investors since October 2015, having previously served as its Senior Vice President, Acquisitions since December 2014. Mr. Oh also served as Senior Vice President — Acquisitions of GA Healthcare REIT II from January 2009 to December 2014 and as Senior Vice President, Acquisitions of AHI Group Holdings from January 2012 to December 2014. Mr. Oh served as the Senior Vice President, Healthcare Real Estate of Grubb & Ellis Equity Advisors from January 2010 to January 2012, having served in the same capacity for Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors since June 2007, where he had been responsible for the acquisition and management of healthcare real estate. Prior to joining Grubb & Ellis, from August 1999 to June 2007, Mr. Oh worked for HCP, where he served as Director of Asset Management and later as Director of Acquisitions. From 1997 to 1999, he worked as an auditor and project manager for Ernst & Young AB in Stockholm, Sweden and from 1993 to 1997 as an auditor within Ernst & Young LLP’s EYKL Real Estate Group in Los Angeles, California. Mr. Oh received a B.S. degree in Accounting from Pepperdine University and is a Certified Public Accountant in the State of California (inactive).
Cora Lo has served as our Assistant General Counsel since December 2015 and has also served as our Secretary since January 2015. Ms. Lo has also served as Senior Vice President, Assistant General Counsel — Corporate of American Healthcare Investors since December 2015, having previously served as its Senior Vice President, Securities Counsel since December 2014. Ms. Lo has also served as Assistant General Counsel of GA Healthcare REIT III since December 2015 and has also served as its Secretary since January 2013. Ms. Lo served as Secretary of GA Healthcare REIT II from November 2010 to December 2014, having previously served as its Assistant Secretary from March 2009 to November 2010. Ms. Lo also served as Senior Vice President, Securities Counsel of AHI Group Holdings from January 2012 to December 2014. Ms. Lo served as Senior Corporate Counsel for Grubb & Ellis from December 2007 to January 2012, having served as Senior Corporate Counsel and Securities Counsel for Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors since January 2007 and December 2005, respectively. She also served as the Assistant Secretary of Grubb & Ellis Apartment REIT, Inc. (later known as Landmark Apartment Trust, Inc.) from June 2008 to November 2010. From September 2002 to December 2005, Ms. Lo served as General Counsel of I/OMagic Corporation, a publicly traded company. Prior to 2002, Ms. Lo practiced as a private attorney specializing in corporate and securities law. Ms. Lo also interned at the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, Division of Enforcement in 1998. Ms. Lo received a B.A. degree in Political Science from University of California, Los Angeles and received a J.D. degree from Boston University. Ms. Lo is a member of the California State Bar Association.
Dianne Hurley has served as one of our independent directors and our audit committee chairwoman since February 2016. She has also served as our special committee chairwoman since October 2020. Ms. Hurley also serves as an independent director and audit committee member of AG Mortgage Investment Trust located in New York, New York, since December 2020. Prior, Ms. Hurley was an independent director and audit committee chairwoman of CC Real Estate Income Fund located in New York, New York, from March 2016 until its liquidation in August of 2020, and an independent director and nominating and corporate governance committee member of NorthStar Realty Europe, located in New York, New York, from August 2016 until its sale in October of 2019, and an independent director and audit committee member of NorthStar/RXR New York Metro Income, Inc. located in New York, New York, from February 2015 until December 2018. Ms. Hurley serves as the Chief Financial and Operations Officer of Moravian Academy in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. Prior, she was the Chief Administrative Officer of A&E Real Estate, located in New York, New York, an owner/operator of multifamily properties, where she worked on the firm’s business and administrative management from March 2017 until June 2020. From January 2015 to present, Ms. Hurley has also worked as an operational consultant to startup asset management firms including BayPine Capital located in Boston, Massachusetts, a large cap digital private equity firm, Stonecourt Capital located in New York, New York, a middle-market growth private equity firm, Imperial Companies located in New York, New York, a real estate private investment firm, and RedBird Capital Partners located in New York, New York, a principal investing firm focused on growth equity, build ups and structured equity investments. Previously, Ms. Hurley served from November 2011 to January 2015 as Managing Director of SG Partners, located in New York, New York, a boutique executive search firm. From September 2009 to November 2011, Ms. Hurley served as the Chief Operating Officer, Global Distribution, at Credit Suisse Asset Management, where she was responsible for overall management of the sales business, strategic initiatives, financial and client reporting and regulatory and compliance oversight. From 2004 to September 2009, Ms. Hurley served as the founding Chief Administrative Officer of TPG-Axon Capital, where she was responsible for investor relations and fundraising, human capital management, compliance policy implementation, joint venture real estate investments and corporate real estate. Earlier in her career, Ms. Hurley worked in the real estate department at Goldman Sachs. Ms. Hurley holds a Bachelor of Arts from Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts and a Master of Business Administration from Yale School of Management, New Haven, Connecticut.
Our board selected Ms. HurleyMr. Streiff to serve as a director because he was our Chief Operating Officer and has significant operational and legal experience relevant to our business, including in part due to her financial expertise, particularlythe areas of asset management, negotiating and structuring healthcare real estate acquisitions, financings, disposition transactions, corporate finance and corporate governance. Additionally, Mr. Streiff has 18 years of experience in the real estate industry.and healthcare industries and relationships with chief executives and other senior management at other real estate and healthcare companies. Our board believes that herhis executive experience in the real estate industry coupled with his deep knowledge of our company’s strategies and operations bring valuable financial and operational expertise to our board.
Scott A. Estes has served as one of our independent directors and a member of the Audit Committee since August 2022 and as chairman of the Audit Committee since June 2023. Mr. Estes has also served as a member of the board of trustees and audit committee chairman of JBG Smith Properties, a NYSE-listed REIT, located in Bethesda, Maryland that owns, operates, invests in and develops a dynamic portfolio of mixed-use properties in the high growth and high barrier-to-entry submarkets in Washington, DC since June 2017. Having served as one of its independent directors and its audit committee chairman since June 2018, Mr. Estes has also served, effective as of December 31, 2023, as Chairman of Essential Properties Realty Trust, a NYSE-listed REIT located in Princeton, New Jersey that acquires, owns and manages primarily single tenant properties. Previously, Mr. Estes served as Executive Vice President — Chief Financial Officer of Welltower Inc., or Welltower, a NYSE-listed, S&P 500 constituent REIT, located in Toledo, Ohio, focused on healthcare infrastructure, from January 2009 to October 2017. Mr. Estes also served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Welltower from March 2006 to January 2009 and as Vice President of Finance of Welltower from April 2003 to March 2006. During his tenure at Welltower, Mr. Estes was significantly involved in managing the capital allocation effort supporting that company’s rapid growth, with direct oversight of capital markets transactions, which raised over $14 billion of equity capital and $10 billion of unsecured debt capital. From January 2000 to April 2003, Mr. Estes served as a Senior Equity Research Analyst and Vice President with Deutsche Bank Securities, a financial services firm, with primary coverage of the healthcare REIT and healthcare services industry sub-sectors. Additionally, Mr. Estes served as Vice President in Bank of America Securities’ equity research department from January 1998 through December 1999, covering the healthcare REIT and senior housing sectors, and as an Associate Analyst and Assistant Vice President in Morgan Stanley’s equity research department from March 1994 through December 1997. Mr. Estes received his B.A. degree in Economics in 1993 from the College of William and Mary.
Our board selected Mr. Estes to serve as a director based on his financial and business expertise, particularly in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of a large, NYSE-listed healthcare REIT. Our board believes that his experience in the oversight of financial reporting, capital markets and capital raising, corporate finance and accounting, treasury, tax and audit functions, as well as his previous service on the board of severaldirectors of two other NYSE-listed REITs (particularly in his role as well as her finance, operations, regulatory and compliance experience,an audit committee chairman) will bring valuable insightvalue to us, particularly in her role as the audit committee chairwoman and audit committee financial expert. With her extensive background in real estate finance and real estate operations, Ms. Hurley brings valuable business skills to our board.us.
Brian J. Flornes has served as one of our independent directors and a member of the Audit Committee since February 2016.2016 and as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee chairman since October 2021. He has also served as a member of our special committee sincefrom October 2020.2020 to October 2021. Mr. Flornes served as the Chief Executive Officer of Vintage Senior Living, or Vintage, from June 2010 to September 2018, having co-founded the company in 1998 and served as its Co-Chief Executive Officer from inception to June 2010. Vintage, located in Newport Beach, California, owned and operated senior housing communities specializing in independent senior living, assisted living and memory care services for Alzheimer’s and other dementia with 24 communities in California and Washington. Vintage grew to be one of the largest assisted living providers in California and consistently ranked in the “Top 50” owners and operators of senior housing across the nation, according to the Assisted Living Federation of America. Vintage sold the majority of its portfolio of communities in 2016, which encompassed in excess of 3,200 resident units with more than 2,000 associates. Since February 2006, Mr. Flornes has been responsible for a direct joint-venture relationship with one of the nation’s largest pension funds. The joint venture, with $325 million$325,000,000 of committed capital, has acquired 19 senior living communities and net asset value has grown to more than 2.5 times invested capital. From 1995 to 1998, Mr. Flornes served as Founder and Principal of American Housing Concepts, a real estate development firm directly associated with ARV Assisted Living, one of the largest senior living providers in the early 1990s. Prior to American Housing Concepts, Mr. Flornes served in several roles and ultimately as President of Development, from 1992 to 1995, of ARV Assisted Living. Throughout his career, Mr. Flornes has directly contributed to the acquisition and development of more than 8,000 units of senior living in 11 states and has been responsible for $1.5 billion in financing. Mr. Flornes was a longstanding member of the American Senior Housing Association and also served on the board of the California Assisted Living Association. Mr. Flornes is a member of the World Presidents’ Organization. Mr. Flornes received a B.A. degree in Communication as well as an M.B.A. degree from Loyola Marymount University.
Our board selected Mr. Flornes to serve as a director because of his particular experience with the acquisition, development, operation and financing of healthcare-related properties and senior housing communities. He has significant knowledge of, and relationships within, the real estate and healthcare industries, due in part to his 30 years of industry experience managing all aspects of senior living. Mr. Flornes’ vast real estate experience in senior living also enhances his ability to contribute insight on achieving our investment objectives. Our board believes that this experience will bring valuable knowledge and operational expertise to our board.
Wilbur H. Smith IIIDianne Hurley has served as one of our independent directors and a member of our audit committeethe Audit Committee since February 2016. She has also served as chairwoman of the Compensation Committee since June 2023, having been a member of such committee since October 2021. Ms. Hurley also served as the chairwoman of the Audit Committee from February 2016 to June 2023 and as our special committee chairwoman from October 2020 to October 2021. Ms. Hurley has also served as an independent director, audit committee chairwoman and member of the nominating and corporate governance committee of AG Mortgage Investment Trust, a publicly traded residential mortgage REIT located in New York, New York, since December 2020. Prior to that, Ms. Hurley was an independent director and audit committee chairwoman of CC Real Estate Income Fund located in New York, New York, from March 2016 until its liquidation in August of 2020, and an independent director and nominating and corporate governance committee member of NorthStar Realty Europe, located in New York, New York, from August 2016 until its sale in October of 2019, and an independent director and audit committee member of NorthStar/RXR New York Metro Income, Inc. located in New York, New York, from February 2015 until December 2018. Ms. Hurley has been an operations, finance and human capital management c-suite consultant in the real estate, asset management and education sectors since 2015. In addition, from April 2022 until July 2023, Ms. Hurley was a Managing Director at Glocap Search, LLC, from May 2020 until April 2022, she was the Chief Financial and Operations Officer of Moravian Academy, and from March 2017 until July 2020, she was the Chief Administrative Officer of A&E Real Estate. From September 2009 to November 2011, Ms. Hurley served as the Chief Operating Officer, Global Distribution, at Credit Suisse Asset Management, where she was responsible for management of the distribution business, strategic initiatives, reporting, and regulatory and compliance oversight. From 2004 to September 2009, Ms. Hurley served as the founding Chief Administrative Officer of TPG-Axon Capital, where she was responsible for investor relations, human capital management, compliance policy implementation, joint venture real estate investments and corporate real estate. Earlier in her career, Ms. Hurley worked in the real estate department at Goldman Sachs. Ms. Hurley holds a Bachelor of Arts from Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts and a Master of Business Administration from the Yale School of Management, New Haven, Connecticut.
Our board selected Ms. Hurley to serve as a director in part due to her financial expertise, particularly in the real estate industry. Our board believes that her service on the board of directors of several REITs, as well as her finance, operations, regulatory and compliance experience, will bring valuable insight to us in her role as the Compensation Committee chairwoman and audit committee financial expert. With her extensive background in real estate finance and real estate operations, Ms. Hurley brings valuable business skills to our board.
Marvin R. O’Quinn has served as one of our independent directors and a member of the Compensation Committee since January 2023. Mr. O’Quinn has also served as the President and Chief Operations Officer of CommonSpirit Health located in Chicago, Illinois, between February 2019 and August 2023, where he spearheaded the growth and policy development of a health system resulting from the merger of Dignity Health and Catholic Health Initiatives that included 140 hospitals, approximately 150,000 employees and $30 billion in annual revenue. From January 2009 until February 2019, Mr. O’Quinn served as the Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Dignity Health, a not-for-profit corporation located in San Francisco, California, that operated hospitals and ancillary care centers located in California, Arizona and Nevada. He also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Jackson Health System in Miami, Florida, from 2003 to 2009. Prior to that, Mr. O’Quinn served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Atlantic Health System in Florham Park, New Jersey, from 2000 until 2003. Mr. O’Quinn has also held executive positions with New York Presbyterian Health System, located in New York, New York, as well as Providence Medical Center and Providence Milwaukie Hospital, located in Portland, Oregon. Additionally, throughout his career, Mr. O’Quinn has held key positions within other hospitals and medical centers throughout the Northwest, including Legacy Emanuel Hospital & Health Center, Willamette Falls Hospital, Valley Children’s Hospital and Harborview Medical Center. Mr. O’Quinn also currently serves as chairman of the board of directors for Dignity Health Global Education, headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, and holds appointments with First Initiatives Insurance, Ltd., a captive insurance company appointments with First Initiatives Insurance, Ltd., a captive insurance company headquartered in Englewood, Colorado, that serves CommonSpirit Health, and Premier, Inc., (NASDAQ: PINC), located in Charlotte, North Carolina, a Nasdaq-listed healthcare improvement company that completed its initial public offering in October 2013. Mr. O’Quinn holds a master’s degree in Health Administration and a bachelor’s degree in Science and Biology from the University of Washington.
Our board selected Mr. Quinn to serve as a director due to his strong background in healthcare delivery systems and healthcare management and his vast understanding of the healthcare industry and extensive leadership experience throughout his more than 40-year career in the healthcare field. With his significant experience, Mr. Quinn brings valuable industry knowledge to our company.
Valerie Richardson has served as one of our independent directors and a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee since January 2023 as well as a member of the Compensation Committee since June 2023. Ms. Richardson has also served as the Chief Operating Officer of the International Council of Shopping Centers, or ICSC, a professional trade organization serving the retail marketplaces industry, located in New York, New York since February 2021. She previously served as the Vice President of Real Estate for The Container Store, Inc., located in Coppell, Texas, where she led its real estate team for 20 years from September 2000 until February 2021. Before joining The Container Store, Inc. in the fall of 2000, she also served as Senior Vice President – Real Estate and Development for Ann Taylor, Inc., headquartered in New York, New York, where she administered the company’s store expansion strategy for Ann Taylor and Ann Taylor Loft. Prior to that, Ms. Richardson was Vice President of Real Estate and Development of Barnes & Noble, Inc., the country’s largest bookselling retailer. Ms. Richardson began her real estate career at Trammell Crow Company, a Dallas-based real estate developer, where she became a Partner in its Shopping Center Division. Additionally, since 2018, Ms. Richardson has also served as a member of the board of directors for Kimco Realty Corporation (NYSE: KIM), North America’s largest publicly traded owner and operator of open-air, grocery-anchored shopping and mixed-use centers, where she also serves as a member of its audit, executive compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees and serves as chairperson of its executive compensation committee. Since 2004, Ms. Richardson has been a member of the Board of Trustees of ICSC and was elected as ICSC Chairman for the 2018 to 2019 term and ICSC Vice-Chairperson for the 2017 to 2018 term. She also served on the Board of the ICSC Foundation from 2011 to 2019, and as a Trustee at Baylor Scott & White Medical Center – Plano from 2010 to 2016. Ms. Richardson earned an M.B.A. in Real Estate from the University of North Texas and a B.S. in Education from Texas State University.
Our board selected Ms. Richardson to serve as director in part due to her over 40 years of experience in the retail real estate industry during which time she held various executive positions. Our board believes that Ms. Richardson’s service on the board of directors of a large NYSE-listed REIT that owns and operates shopping centers brings valuable insight to us, particularly in her role on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee. With her broad understanding of real estate strategy and perspective on industry best practices, Ms. Richardson contributes beneficial business knowledge and skills to our company.
Wilbur H. Smith III has served as one of our independent directors since February 2016 and as a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee since October 2021. He also served as a member of our special committee sincefrom October 2020.2020 to October 2021. Mr. Smith is the Chief Executive Officer, President and Founder of Greenlaw Partners, LLC, a full-service real estate development and operating company, and Greenlaw Management, Inc., a commercial property management company, or, collectively, known as Greenlaw, which are located in Irvine, California and which he founded in March 2003. Mr. Smith personally oversees all aspects of Greenlaw’s acquisition, operations and investment development/redevelopment programs. Since inception and under Mr. Smith’s leadership, Greenlaw has completed in excess of $5.0$10.0 billion in acquisitions and dispositions of 220 commercial real estate properties.properties comprised of office, industrial, retail and multifamily assets, as well as land holdings. The majority of GreenlawGreenlaw’s assets have been in joint ventures with ultra-high net worth individuals and leading global institutional groups including Walton Street, Westbrook, Oaktree, BGO, Invesco, Cigna, UBS, Guggenheim, Cross Harbor and Cerberus. Currently, Greenlaw owns and manages a joint ventureGreenlaw’s portfolio in California approachingapproaches $3.0 billion in value thatand has approximately 10,000,000 square feet of buildings primarily comprisedincome assets and over 10,000 acres of office, industrial, retail, medical office and multifamily assets.land. Prior to Greenlaw, Mr. Smith served as Vice President of Newport Beach based Makar Properties from 1999 to 2003. Mr. Smith also served as Trustee of Partners Real Estate Investment Trust from June 2013 to December 2013 and since 2012 has served on the Boardboard of California Waterfowl Association.Association from 2012 to 2016. Mr. Smith is an active member of Young Presidents Organization, (YPO)or YPO, and currently serves on the board of the Orange County Gold Chapter. In addition, Mr. Smith is a founding member of Tiger21 Orange County Chapter, and sits on the executive board of the University of Southern California Lusk Center for Real Estate as well as onand is the Vice Chair of the Board of Counselors of the University of Southern California Price School of Public Policy Advisory Board for the Bachelor of Science in Real Estate Development.School. Mr. Smith is a licensed California real estate broker and received a B.S. degree in Agriculture from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, and earned a Master’smaster’s degree in Real Estate Development from the University of Southern California.
Our board selected Mr. Smith to serve as a director due to his vast experience in the acquisition, operations, investment and disposition of commercial real estate as well as his experience with a number of leading global institutions through joint ventures, matching acquisitions with the appropriate investment structures/channels. Mr. Smith’s experience in the commercial real estate industry, capital markets and real estate operations enhances his ability to contribute to our investment strategies and help us achieve our investment objectives. Our board believes his executive experience in the real estate industry will bring strong financial and operational expertise to our board.
Richard S. Welch has served as one of our directors since January 2018. Mr. Welch has also served on the Executive Committee of American Healthcare Investors since April 2017, and on the investment committee of our advisor since April 2017. Mr. Welch has served as a Managing Director at Colony Capital, located in Los Angeles, California, responsible for managing certain financial and operational aspects of Colony Capital’s investment portfolio and operating businesses, which have included various healthcare investments, since July 2007. Beginning in April 2017, Mr. Welch assumed oversight of Colony Capital’s healthcare portfolio. Prior to joining the Colony Capital business in 2005, Mr. Welch was a Vice President in the Investment Banking Division of Goldman, Sachs & Co., focusing on mergers and acquisitions and debt and equity financings for companies in the real estate, retail, and consumer product industries. Mr. Welch has also served as an independent director and member of the audit and compensation committees of BBQ Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: BBQ) since May 2018. He has also served as the Chairman of NorthStar Healthcare Income, Inc., located in New York, New York, since November 2020. Mr. Welch received a B.S. degree in Accounting from University of Southern California and an M.B.A. degree from The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania and is a Certified Public Accountant in the State of California (inactive).
Our board selected Mr. Welch to serve as a director due to his many years of experience in commercial real estate, as well as debt and equity financing. Mr. Welch’s extensive knowledge of managing and operating real estate investment portfolios, including in the healthcare industry, and capital markets expertise are significant assets to our company. Based on Mr. Welch’s experience, our board believes that Mr. Welch brings valuable business skills to our board.
Key Officers
The following table and biographical descriptions set forth certain information with respect to the individuals who are our non-executive key officers:officers:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Age* | | Position |
| Kenny Lin | | 44 | | 47 | | Executive Vice President, Chief Accounting & Finance |
Wendie Newman | | 57Officer, Deputy Financial Officer | | Vice President of Asset Management |
Gabriel M. WillhiteWendie Newman | | 4060 | | Executive Vice President, Asset Management |
| Ray Oborn | | Assistant54 | | Executive Vice President, Asset Management |
| Cora Lo | | 49 | | Senior Vice President, Associate General Counsel — Transactionsand Assistant Secretary |
____________________
*As of March 26, 202122, 2024
Kenny Lin has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Deputy Chief Financial Officer since March 2023, having previously served as our Executive Vice President, Accounting & Finance sincefrom October 2021 to March 2023 and as our Vice President, Accounting & Finance from September 2020.2020 to October 2021. He has also served as Executive Vice President, Accounting & Finance of American Healthcare Investors sincefrom February 2020 to October 2021, and prior to that served as Senior Vice President, Accounting & Finance, Vice President, Accounting & Finance and Director, Accounting & Finance of American Healthcare Investors fromsince November 2016, March 2014 and November 2012, to February 2020, respectively. Mr. Lin has also served as Vice President, Accounting & Finance of GA Healthcare REITGAHR III sincefrom September 2020.2020 to October 2021. Mr. Lin previously served as Chief Financial Officer of Mobilitie, LLC, a privately-owned telecommunications infrastructure company based in Newport Beach, California, since 2012 and prior to that date, he served as Chief Accounting Officer and Director of Financial Reporting since October 2010 and April 2008, respectively, where he oversaw the accounting, taxation, financial reporting and human resources functions of the company. Prior to joining Mobilitie, LLC, Mr. Lin was a Senior Accountant at Grubb & Ellis in Santa Ana, California, from June 2005 until April 2008, where he was responsible for managing financial reporting and was integral to the consolidation aspects of Grubb & Ellis’ merger with NNN Realty Advisors. Throughout his career, Mr. Lin has served in various financial accounting roles within publicly traded companies, including Johnson & Johnson, Bank of New York Mellon Corp. and STAAR Surgical Company. Mr. Lin received a B.S. degree in Accounting from California State University, Los Angeles and a Master’s degree in Accounting from the University of Southern California. Mr. Lin is a Certified Public Accountant in the State of California, and he is also a Certified Financial Planner and Certified Management Accountant.
Wendie Newmanhas served as our Executive Vice President of Asset Management since October 2021, having previously served as our Vice President of Asset Management sincefrom June 2017.2017 to October 2021. She has also served as Executive Vice President of Asset Management of American Healthcare Investors sincefrom December 2016.2016 to October 2021. Ms. Newman has also served as Vice President of Asset Management of GA Healthcare REITGAHR III sincefrom June 2017.2017 to October 2021. Ms. Newman previously served as Senior Vice President of Lillibridge Healthcare Services, located in Chicago, Illinois, a wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of Ventas, Inc., or Ventas, one of the leading publicly traded REITs, from June 2011 to November 2016, where she was responsible for the financial performance of the medical office building assets within the western region portfolio. Prior to it being acquired by Ventas, Ms. Newman served as Senior Asset Manager of Nationwide Health Properties, a publicly traded REIT that invested in healthcare-related assets, from June 2008 to May 2011. Ms. Newman also served as Vice-President, Asset Manager of PM Realty Group, one of the leading providers of property management services, from March 2005 to April 2008, where she was responsible for the asset management of a portfolio consisting of office, industrial and retail properties. Prior to PM Realty Group, Ms. Newman served as Regional Manager of Sares-Regis Group, from January 2004 to February 2005. Ms. Newman also previously served in property manager roles with CB Richard Ellis, Inc., Greystone Group LLC, and Fairfield Properties,
Inc. during her career. Ms. Newman received a B.S. degree in Business Administration from the University of Southern California and an M.B.A. degree in Finance from California State University, Long Beach. Ms. Newman is a Certified Property Manager and member of the Institute of Real Estate Management.
Gabriel M. WillhiteRay Oborn has served as our Assistant General Counsel — TransactionsExecutive Vice President of Asset Management since January 2020.October 2021. He has also served as Executive Vice President General Counselof Asset Management of American Healthcare Investors from October 2020 to October 2021. Mr. Oborn served as President of Cherrywood Pointe Investment, located in Minneapolis, Minnesota, from February 2017 to August 2020 where he was directly responsible for managing the firm’s senior housing portfolio and strategic growth initiatives. During that same period, Mr. Oborn also served as Executive Vice President of United Properties, the parent company of Cherrywood Pointe Investment, a real estate investment and development company also located in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Additionally, Mr. Oborn served as Senior Regional Vice President of operations for Brookdale Senior Living from December 2014 to February 2017, and in executive capacities with New Perspective Senior Living from April 2013 to October
2014 and with Silverado Senior Living from October 2010 to January 2013. Prior to Silverado, Mr. Oborn served as Senior Vice President of Operations for the western division and oversaw in excess of 70 communities in the Western US and Canada at Sunrise Senior Living, from January 2008 to September 2010. He began his career with ManorCare Health Services in 1995 as a licensed nursing home administrator. Mr. Oborn received a bachelor’s degree in behavioral science and health and an M.B.A. from the University of Utah.
Cora Lo has served as our Senior Vice President, Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary since February 2023, having previously served as our Senior Vice President, Assistant General Counsel from October 2021 to February 2023 and our Secretary from January 2020 and prior2015 to thatFebruary 2023. From December 2015 to October 2021, she also served as our Assistant General Counsel. Ms. Lo also served as Senior Vice President, Assistant General Counsel — TransactionsCorporate of American Healthcare Investors since April 2016. Mr. Willhite hasfrom December 2015 to October 2021, having previously served as its Senior Vice President, Securities Counsel from December 2014 to December 2015. Ms. Lo also served as Assistant General Counsel — Transactions of GA Healthcare REITGAHR III from December 2015 to October 2021, and also served as its Secretary from January 2013 to October 2021. Ms. Lo served as Secretary of GAHR II from November 2010 to December 2014, having previously served as its Assistant Secretary from March 2009 to November 2010. Ms. Lo also served as Senior Vice President, Securities Counsel of AHI Group Holdings from January 2012 to December 2014. Ms. Lo served as Senior Corporate Counsel for Grubb & Ellis from December 2007 to January 2012, having served as Senior Corporate Counsel and Securities Counsel for Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors since January 2020. From November 2012 until April 2016, Mr. Willhite2007 and December 2005, respectively. She also served as Legal Counsel for Sabal Financial Group, L.P.the Assistant Secretary of Grubb & Ellis Apartment REIT, Inc., a real estate and finance company based in Newport Beach, California which was later known as Landmark Apartment Trust, Inc., from June 2008 to November 2010. From September 2002 to December 2005, Ms. Lo served as General Counsel of I/OMagic Corporation, a subsidiary of Oaktree Capital Management, where he was responsible for overseeing portfolio acquisitions, financings, joint ventures, dispositions and strategic workout transactions.publicly traded company. Prior to joining Sabal Financial Group, Mr. Willhite was2002, Ms. Lo served as an associateattorney in private practice, representing public and private company clients in all areas of corporate and securities law. Ms. Lo also interned at the transactional practice groupUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, Division of Greenberg Traurig, LLPEnforcement in Irvine, California. Mr. Willhite1998. Ms. Lo received a B.A. degree in Political Science and Communication from the University of Southern California, Los Angeles and received a J.D. degree from University of Minnesota Law School. HeBoston University. Ms. Lo is a member of the California State Bar Association.
There are no family relationships among any non-executive key officers, directors and executive officers. EachDirector Independence
At least a majority of our directors and executive and non-executive key officers has stated that there is no arrangementare required to qualify as “independent” as affirmatively determined by our board. After review of all relevant transactions or understandingrelationships between each director, or any of any kind between himhis or her family members, and any other person pursuantAmerican Healthcare REIT, our senior management and our independent registered public accounting firm, our board has determined that Messrs. Estes, Flornes, O’Quinn and Smith, and Mses. Hurley and Richardson, who comprise a majority of our board, meet the current independence and qualifications requirements of the NYSE. In addition, our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee members qualify as independent under the NYSE rules applicable to which he or she was selected as a director or executive or non-executive key officer.audit committee and compensation committee members.
Board of Directors Leadership Structure
Jeffrey T. Hanson serveshas served as both our non-executive Chairman of our board since June 2022. From October 2021 to June 2022, he served as our Executive Chairman of our board. Mr. Hanson also served as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our board from January 2015 to October 2021. Danny Prosky assumed the role of Chief Executive Officer and became a member of our board in October 2021. Our independent directors believe our board leadership structure is in the best interests of our stockholders as Mr. Hanson is uniquely positioned to lead our board with his exceptional depth of knowledge about our company and the opportunities and challenges we face. As our former Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Hanson provides valuable industry and strategic perspective to our board. Separating the roles of Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer. Our independent directors have determined that the most effective leadership structure for our company at the present time is forOfficer also allows our Chief Executive Officer to also serve asfocus on managing our business and operations, while our Chairman of the Boardboard focuses on board of Directors. Our independent directors matters, which we believe that because our Chief Executive Officer is ultimately responsible for our day-to-day operations and for executing our business strategy, and because our performance is an integral partespecially important in light of the deliberationshigh level of our board, our Chief Executive Officer is the director best qualified to act as Chairmanregulation and scrutiny of the Boardpublic company boards of Directors.directors. Our board retains the authority to modify this structure to best address our unique circumstances, and so advance the best interests of all stockholders, as and when appropriate.
In addition, although we do not have a lead independent director, our board believes that the current structure is appropriate as we have no employees and are externally managed by our advisor, whereby all operations are conducted by our advisor or its affiliates.
Our board also believes,that, for the reasons set forth below, that its existing corporate governance practices achieve independent oversight and management accountability, which is the goal that many companies seek to achieve by separating the roles of Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer.accountability. Our governance practices provide for strong independent leadership, independent discussion among directors and for independent evaluation of, and communication with, many members of senior management. These governance practices are reflected in our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as amended, or our Code of Ethics.Ethics, and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Some of the relevant processes and other corporate governance practices include:
•A majority of our directors are independent directors. Each director is an equal participant in decisions made by our full board. In addition, all matters that relate to our co-sponsors, our advisor or any
•We have separate chairman of their affiliates must be approved by a majoritythe board and chief executive officer roles.
•An Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee comprised entirely of independent directors.
•Strategic and risk oversight by our board and committees of the board.
•The consideration of factors including diversity, age, skills, and such other factors as our board deems appropriate given the current needs of our board and our company, when appointing new directors.
•Each of our directors is elected annually by our stockholders.
•An annual board of directors and committee of the board of directors evaluation process.
Committees of our Board of Directors
Our board has establishedthree standing committees: an audit committeeAudit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a specialNominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The principal functions of each committee andare briefly described below. Additionally, our board may from time to time establish other committees it deems appropriate to address specific areas in more depth than may be possible at a full board meeting, provided that the majorityfacilitate our board’s oversight of management of the business and affairs of our company. Each committee’s charter is available on the Investor Relations — Corporate Governance section of our website at www.AmericanHealthcareREIT.com. The current chairs and members of each committee are independent directors.set forth below.
Audit Committee. We have established an audit committee which currently consists of all of our independent directors, Mr. Flornes, Ms. Hurley and Messrs. Flornes and Estes, all of whom are independent directors, with Mr. Smith, with Ms. HurleyEstes serving as the chairwomanchairman of the audit committee andAudit Committee. Our board has determined that Ms. Hurley qualifies as an audit committee financial expert. The audit committee has adopted a charter, which is available to our stockholders at http://www.healthcarereitiv.com. The audit committee held five meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.expert under applicable SEC rules. Our audit committee’s primary function is to assist theour board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by reviewing the financial information to be provided to the stockholders and others, the system of internal controls which management has established, and the audit and financial reporting process. The audit committee:Audit Committee: (1) has direct responsibility for appointing and overseeing an independent registered public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, to serve as our independent auditors; (2) reviews the plans and results of the audit engagement with our independent registered public
accounting firm; (3) approves audit and non-audit professional services (including the fees and terms thereof) provided by, and the independence of, our independent registered public accounting firm; and (4) consults with our independent registered public accounting firm regarding the adequacy of our internal controls. The Audit Committee also approves the audit committee report required by SEC regulations to be included in our annual proxy statement. Additionally, the Audit Committee oversees the investigation and handling of any concerns or complaints that arise under the our whistleblower policy, which includes a third-party administered whistleblower hotline and dedicated email address to enable all interested parties, including our employees, to submit confidential complaints, concerns, unethical business practices, violations or suspected violations for any and all matters pertaining to accounting, internal control, or auditing, as well as potential violations of a law, rule, regulation, or our Code of Ethics. Pursuant to our audit committeeAudit Committee charter, the audit committeeAudit Committee will be comprised solely of independent directors.
Special CommitteeCompensation Committee.. In October 2020, our board We established a specialcompensation committee in October 2021, which consistsis currently comprised of Mr. O’Quinn and Mses. Hurley and Richardson, all of ourwhom are independent directors, Ms. Hurley and Messrs. Flornes and Smith, with Ms. Hurley serving as the chairwoman of the special committee. Our special committee’s function is limited to the investigation and analyses of strategic alternatives, including but not limited to, the saleCompensation Committee. The primary focus of our assets, a listing of our shares on a national securities exchange, or a merger with another entity, including a merger with another unlisted entity that we expect would enhance our value. See our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 19, 2021 for more information.
Acquisition Committee. We currently do not have, but we may have in the future, an acquisition committee comprised of members of our boardCompensation Committee is to approve acquisitions that do not require approval by the full board. However, properties and real estate-related investments may be acquired from our co-sponsors, our advisor, our directors and their respective affiliates only if a majority of our board, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction approve the transaction as being fair and reasonable to our company and at a price to our company no greater than the cost of the property to such person, unless substantial justification exists for a price in excess of the cost to such person and the excess is reasonable.
Compensation Committee. We currently do not have any employees and we do not pay any compensation directly to our executive officers. Therefore, we currently do not have a compensation committee, although we may establish a compensation committee in the future comprised of a minimum of three directors, including at least two independent directors, to establish compensation strategies and programs for our directors and executive officers. However, at a later date, the compensation committee may exercise all powers ofassist our board in connectionfulfilling its responsibilities with establishingrespect to officer and implementingdirector compensation. Our Compensation Committee assists our board in this regard by: (1) reviewing and approving our corporate goals with respect to compensation matters.of executive officers; (2) reviewing and acting on compensation levels and benefit plans for our executive officers; (3) recommending to our board compensation for all non-employee directors, including board of directors and committee retainers, meeting fees and equity-based compensation; (4) administering and granting awards under the American Healthcare REIT, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2015 Incentive Plan, or the AHR Incentive Plan; and (5) setting the terms and conditions of such awards in accordance with the 2015 Incentive Plan. Our Compensation Committee fulfills these responsibilities in accordance with its charter and current laws, rules and regulations. Stock-based compensation plans will be administered by theour board if the members of the compensation committeeour Compensation Committee do not qualify as “non-employee directors” within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act; however, our board has determined that each member of our Compensation Committee is a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. We do not have a separate nominating and corporate governance committee. We believe that our board is qualified to perform the functions typically delegated toestablished a nominating and corporate governance committee in October 2021, which is currently comprised of Messrs. Flornes and Smith and Ms. Richardson, all of whom are independent directors, with Mr. Flornes serving as the chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s primary focus is to assist our board in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to director nominations, corporate governance, board of directors and committee evaluations and conflict resolutions. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists our board of directors in this regard by: (1) identifying individuals qualified to serve on our board, consistent with criteria approved by our board, and recommending that our board select a slate of director nominees for election by our stockholders at the formationannual meeting of a separate committee is notour stockholders; (2) developing
and implementing the process necessary at this time. Instead,to identify prospective members of our board; (3) determining the fulladvisability of retaining any search firm or consultant to assist in the identification and evaluation of candidates for membership on our board; (4) overseeing an annual evaluation of our board, performs functions similareach of the committees of our board and management; (5) developing and recommending to those which might otherwise normally be delegated to such a committee, including, among other things, developingour board a set of corporate governance principles adopting a code of ethics, adopting objectives with respect to conflicts of interest, monitoringand policies; (6) periodically reviewing our compliance with corporate governance requirementsprinciples and policies and suggesting improvements thereto to our board; and (7) considering and acting on any conflicts-related matter required by our charter or otherwise permitted by Maryland law where the exercise of stateindependent judgment by any of our directors, could reasonably be compromised, including approval of any transaction involving any of our affiliates. Our Nominating and federal law, establishing criteriaCorporate Governance Committee fulfills these responsibilities primarily by carrying out the activities enumerated in its charter and in accordance with current laws, rules and regulations.
Corporate Governance
Pursuant to our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s charter, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee developed and recommended a set of formal, written guidelines for prospective members of the board, conducting candidate searches and interviews, overseeing and evaluating the board andcorporate governance, or our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which were adopted by our full board. We also adhere to what we believe to be industry leading policies to ensure our management evaluatingand employees are acting in a manner which protects the best interest of our stockholders. This includes our Code of Ethics, Whistleblower Policy, Insider Trading Policy, Regulation FD and Disclosure Policy, and Related Party Transactions Policy.
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also, from time to time, reviews our governance structures and procedures and suggests improvements thereto to our full board. Such improvements, if adopted by our full board, will be incorporated into our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Periodic Evaluations
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducts an annual evaluation of its own performance and oversees the appropriate size and compositionannual evaluations of our board, each of the other committees of our board and recommending, as appropriate, increases, decreasesmanagement.
Conflicts of Interest
Our Nominating and changes toCorporate Governance Committee considers and acts upon any conflicts of interest-related matter required by our charter or otherwise permitted by Maryland law where the compositionexercise of the board and formally proposing the slate of directors to be elected at each annual meetingindependent judgment by any of our stockholders.directors, who is not an independent director, could reasonably be compromised, including approval of any transaction involving our affiliates.
Director Nomination Procedures and Diversity
As outlined above,Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, among other things, assists our board in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to director nominations. In selecting a qualified nominee for recommendation to our board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers such factors as it deems appropriate, which may include: the current composition of our board; the range of talents of a nominee that would best complement those already represented on our board; the extent to which a nominee would diversify our board; a nominee’s standards of integrity, commitment and independence of thought and judgment; a nominee’s ability to represent the long-term interests of our stockholders as a whole; a nominee’s relevant expertise and experience upon which to be able to offer advice and guidance to management; a nominee who is accomplished in his or her respective field, with superior credentials and recognition; and the need for specialized expertise. While we do not have term limits for our board or a formal refreshment policy, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and board regularly evaluate potential candidates and consider the potential benefits of adding new members to our board.
While we do not have a formal diversity policy, we believe that the backgrounds and qualifications of our directors, considered as a group, should provide a significant composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow our board to fulfill its responsibilities. Applying these criteria, ourAccordingly, we actively seek out qualified women and individuals from underrepresented communities to include in the pool from which board considers candidates for membership on our board suggested by its members, as well as by our stockholders. Members of our boarddirector nominees are chosen. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviewreviews our board’s composition by evaluating whether our board has the right mix of skills, experience and backgrounds. Our board may also consider an assessmentAs part of such annual review process, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews its diversity,own effectiveness in its broadest sense, reflecting, but not limitedrecommending director nominees with diverse backgrounds and experiences relative to age, geography, gender and ethnicity.
Our board identifies nominees by first evaluatingany perceived needs in the current memberscomposition of our board.
While our full board willing to continue in service. Current members ofremains responsible for selecting its own nominees and recommending them for election by our stockholders, our board with skills and experience relevanthas delegated the screening process necessary to identify qualified candidates to our businessNominating and who are willing to continue in service are considered for re-nomination. If any member of our board does not wish to continue in service or if our board decides not to nominate a member for re-election, our board will review the desired skills and experience of a new nominee in light of the criteria set forth above.Corporate Governance Committee.
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews director suitability and the continuing composition of our board; it then recommends director nominees who are voted on by our full board. In recommending director nominees to our board, alsoour Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers nomineescandidates for membership on our board recommended by stockholders.its own members, other directors and management, as well as by our stockholders, provided such stockholder nominations for our board meet the established director criteria. Notice of proposed stockholder nominations for our board must be delivered in accordance with the requirements set forth in our bylaws and SEC Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Exchange Act. Nominations must include the full name of the proposed nominee, a brief description of the proposed nominee’s business experience for at least the previous five years and a representation that the nominating stockholder is a beneficial or record owner of our common stock. Any such submission must be accompanied by the written consent of the proposed nominee to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected. Nominations should be delivered to: Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT, IV, Inc., Board of Directors, 18191 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 300, Irvine, California 92612, Attention: Secretary.
In evaluating the persons nominated as potential directors, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider each candidate without regard to the source of the recommendation and take into account those factors that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determines are relevant. Our board, recommendsbased on the recommendation of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, selects the slate of directors to be nominated for election at the annual meeting of stockholders. We have not employed or paid a fee
Corporate Responsibility — Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
Refer to Item 1, Business — Corporate Responsibility — Environmental, Social and do not currently employ or pay a fee to, any third party to identify or evaluate, or assist in identifying or evaluating, potential director nominees.Governance (ESG), for more information regarding our corporate responsibility and ESG initiatives.
Board of Directors Role in Risk Oversight
Our board oversees our stockholders’ and other stakeholders’ interest in the long-term success of our business strategy and our overall financial strength.
Our board is actively involved in overseeing risks associated with our business strategies and decisions. It does so, in part, through its approvaloversight of our executive officers responsible for our real estate and real estate-related investments, acquisitions and dispositions and debt financing, as well as its oversight of our executive officers and advisor.
In particular, our board may determine at any time to terminate our advisor pursuant to the terms of an advisory agreement with our advisor, or the Advisory Agreement, and must evaluate the performance of our advisor, and re-authorize the Advisory Agreement, on an annual basis.financing. Our board is also responsible for overseeing risks related to corporate governance and the selection of nominees to our board.
In addition, the audit committeeAudit Committee meets regularly with our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, independent registered public accounting firm and legal counsel to discuss our major financial risk exposures, financial reporting, internal controls, credit and liquidity risk, compliance risk and compliancecybersecurity risk. The audit committeeAudit Committee meets regularly in separate executive sessions with the independent registered public accounting firm, as well as with committee members only, to facilitate a full and candid discussion of risk and other governance issues.
The Compensation Committee oversees, among other things, the assessment and management of risks related to our incentive compensation plans and equity-based incentive plan and whether our incentive compensation arrangements encourage excessive risk taking.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the assessment and management of risks related to our governance structure, including our board leadership structure and management and director succession, as well as our ESG risks, trends and best practices.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted our Code of Ethics, which contains general guidelines for conducting our business and is designed to help our directors, employees and independent consultants resolve ethical issues in an increasingly complex business environment. Our Code of Ethics applies to our Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and persons performing similar functionsofficers, employees and all members of our board. Our Code of Ethics covers topics including, but not limited to, conflicts of interest, fair dealing, confidentiality of information, and compliance with laws and regulations. Stockholders may request a copy of our Code of Ethics, which will be provided without charge, by writing to: Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT, IV, Inc., 18191 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 300, Irvine, California 92612, Attention: Secretary. Our Code of Ethics is also available in the Investor Relations – Corporate Governance section on our website, http://www.healthcarereitiv.com.www.AmericanHealthcareREIT.com. If, in the future, we amend, modify or waive a provision in our Code of Ethics, we may, rather than filing a Current Report on Form 8-K, satisfy the disclosure requirement by posting such information on our website, as necessary.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis
We have no employees. Our executive officers are all employees of affiliates of our advisor and are compensated by these entities for their services to us. Our day-to-day management is performed by our advisor and its affiliates. We pay these entities fees and reimburse expenses pursuant to the Advisory Agreement. We do not currently intend to pay any compensation directly to our executive officers. As a result, we do not have, and our board has not considered, a compensation policy or program for our executive officers and has not included aIntroduction
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis aoutlines the principles underlying our executive compensation policies and decisions as it relates to our named executive officers, or NEOs. Our NEOs and their positions held for the year ended December 31, 2023 were:
•Danny Prosky — Chief Executive Officer and President
•Brian S. Peay — Chief Financial Officer
•Gabriel M. Willhite — Chief Operating Officer
•Stefan K.L. Oh — Chief Investment Officer
•Mark E. Foster — Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
The Compensation Committee Report or a resolution subjectbelieves that our compensation program for executive officers is an important tool to:
•attract, retain and motivate highly-skilled executives;
•encourage management to a stockholder advisory vote to approvebalance short-term goals and longer-term objectives without incentivizing excessive risk-taking;
•achieve an appropriate balance between risk and reward that does not incentivize excessive risk-taking; and
•align the interests of management and stockholders through the use of equity-based compensation.
The Compensation Committee applied this philosophy in establishing each of the elements of executive compensation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.
Our Compensation and Governance Practices & Policies
We believe the following practices and policies promote sound compensation governance and are in the best interests of our executive officers in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.stockholders and executives:
Hedging Practices | | | | | |
| What We Do | What We Don’t Do |
| ✓ Compensation Committee comprised solely of independent directors | x No significant perquisites |
| ✓ Independent compensation consultant | x No minimum guaranteed base salary increases |
| ✓ Significant portion of total compensation in the form of equity awards with long-term vesting | x No tax gross ups to our NEOs |
| ✓ Significant portion of total compensation is based on performance and is not guaranteed | x We have a defined program that does not allow for uncapped bonus payouts |
| ✓ We enhance executive officer retention with time-based, multi-year vesting equity incentive awards | x We do not allow hedging or pledging of our securities |
| ✓ We use multiple performance measures for cash bonuses and multi-year equity awards, which mitigates compensation-related risk | x We do not provide single-trigger change in control cash severance payments |
We have not adopted any practice or policies regarding the abilityDetermining Compensation for Named Executive Officers
Role of Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors or employees (including officers), or their designees, to purchase financial instruments, or otherwise engage in transactions, that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market valueand operates under a written charter. The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining compensation for all of our stock held by such insiders.NEOs including evaluating compensation policies, approving target and actual compensation for executives and administering our equity incentive programs.
Role of Management
Our Chief Executive Officer plays an important role in setting compensation for our other executive officers by assisting the Compensation Committee in evaluating individual goals and objectives and developing compensation recommendations for NEOs other than himself. Final decisions on the design of the compensation program, including total compensation, are ultimately made by the Compensation Committee.
Role of Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee is authorized to retain the services of a compensation consultant to be used to assist in the review and establishment of our compensation programs and related policies. For 2023 compensation, at the recommendation of management, the Compensation Committee retained Ferguson Partners Consulting, L.P., or FPC, as its independent compensation consultant to advise it on executive officer and director compensation. FPC did not provide any other services to management. The Compensation Committee believes that there are no conflicts of interest with respect to FPC’s services.
Results of 2023 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
At our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, we asked our stockholders to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation paid to our NEOs for the year ended December 31, 2022. Our stockholders showed support for our executive compensation program, with 86.0% of the votes cast approving the advisory resolution. The Compensation Committee did not make any changes to our executive compensation program in response to the 2023 advisory vote on executive compensation.
Benchmarking and Peer Group Comparisons
The Compensation Committee reviews competitive compensation data from a select group of peer companies and broader survey sources. Although comparisons of compensation paid to our NEOs relative to compensation paid to similarly situated executives in the survey and by our peers assist the Compensation Committee in determining compensation, the Compensation Committee principally evaluates executive compensation based on corporate objectives and individual performance. Additionally, as part of its engagement, FPC provided the Compensation Committee with comparative market data on the overall compensation program for our executive officers based on an analysis of peer companies. In developing our peer group, the Compensation Committee took into consideration the following characteristics:
•Portfolio size;
•Market capitalization and total capitalization;
•Asset class of portfolio; and
•Pre-listing history (emergence from non-listed REIT market to listed REIT market).
The table set forth below identifies the companies in the peer group used for 2023, which the Compensation Committee considered as part of its analysis in setting compensation for our executive officers. This was the same peer group that was established and used in connection with compensation decisions made at the time of the AHI Acquisition.
| | | | | | | | |
| 2023 Executive Compensation Peer Group |
|
| Brandywine Realty Trust | Highwood Properties, Inc. | Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. |
| CareTrust REIT, Inc. | LTC Properties, Inc. | Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. |
| Global Medical REIT Inc. | National Health Investors, Inc. | Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. |
| Peakstone Realty Trust | Orion Office REIT, Inc. | Sila Realty Trust, Inc. |
| Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated | Physicians Realty Trust | SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. |
Alignment of Pay and Performance
We maintain a target compensation program that is designed to appropriately align the compensation of our executives with performance. For 2023, approximately 78.6% of our Chief Executive Officer’s target pay was performance-based/at risk and approximately 70.2% of target pay for the remaining NEOs was performance-based/at risk. The pay mix of our executives for 2023 is shown below:
Elements of Compensation
For 2023, our executive compensation program for our NEOs consisted of base salary, a short-term incentive cash bonus and long-term equity incentive awards. The material components of our 2023 executive compensation program are summarized in the following chart:
| | | | | |
| Base Salary | Fixed level of competitive base pay to attract and retain executive talent generally based on scope and complexity of role and responsibilities |
| Short-Term Incentive Program | Designed to reward our NEOs for the achievement of annual corporate performance goals and individual performance goals •Includes 70% (varies by executive officer) of objectively evaluated metrics for corporate performance •Includes 30% (varies by executive officer) of subjectively evaluated strategic goals and individual performance |
| Long-Term Incentive Program | Awarded to encourage retention and alignment with the long-term growth and performance that maximizes stockholder value. 25% of total award is performance-based, and 75% is time-based and subject to the NEO’s continued employment or provision of services |
Base Salary
We provide base salaries to our NEOs to compensate them for services rendered on a day-to-day basis. Base salary is also intended to attract and retain executive officers and is generally based on the scope and complexity of the role and responsibilities, experience, individual performance and contributions, and internal pay equity considerations, taking into account comparable company data provided by our compensation consultant and based upon the Compensation Committee’s understanding of compensation paid to similarly situated executives, adjusted as necessary to recruit or retain specific individuals. The Compensation Committee seeks to target our NEOs’ base salaries at competitive levels to recognize professional growth, success and/or increased responsibilities. We believe that providing a competitive base salary relative to the companies with which we compete for executive talent is a necessary element of a compensation program that is designed to attract and retain talented and experienced executives. We also believe that attractive base salaries can motivate and reward
our executive officers for their overall performance. Base salaries are reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee to assess if adjustments are necessary.
The base salaries for our NEOs for 2023 and 2022 are shown below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Named Executive Officer | | 2023 Salary | | 2022 Salary | | | % Change |
| Danny Prosky | | $ | 750,000 | | | $ | 750,000 | | | | — |
| Brian S. Peay | | $ | 475,000 | | | $ | 475,000 | | | | — |
| Gabriel M. Willhite | | $ | 425,000 | | | $ | 425,000 | | (1) | | — |
| Stefan K.L. Oh | | $ | 400,000 | | | $ | 400,000 | | | | — |
| Mark E. Foster | | $ | 360,000 | | | $ | 360,000 | | | | — |
___________
(1) Reflects Mr. Willhite’s annualized base salary following his promotion in August 2022.
Short-Term Incentive Program (Cash Bonuses)
As part of our compensation program, our NEOs are entitled to receive an annual cash bonus within a specified range based on a percentage of their base salary. The following table sets forth the threshold (as a percentage of target), target (as a percentage of base salary), and maximum (as a percentage of target) bonus opportunities for each NEO under our annual cash bonus program and used in determining 2023 awards:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Named Executive Officer | | Threshold | | Target | | Maximum |
| Danny Prosky | | 50% | | 100% | | 150% |
| Brian S. Peay | | 50% | | 100% | | 150% |
| Gabriel M. Willhite | | 50% | | 100% | | 150% |
| Stefan K.L. Oh | | 50% | | 75% | | 150% |
| Mark E. Foster | | 50% | | 65% | | 150% |
In determining the size of cash bonus awards, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with FPC, thoroughly reviews our corporate performance and the individual performance of the NEOs. For 2023, individual performance was evaluated subjectively by the Compensation Committee while corporate performance was evaluated objectively, with corporate performance being evaluated against pre-determined performance metrics and hurdles. For 2023, the objective performance metrics included Adjusted EBITDA Growth (excluding grant income), our net debt to adjusted EBITDA and our same-property NOI Growth (as defined below, and excluding grant income), as described further below. Our 2023 performance measures were selected based on a careful assessment of measures that we believe encourage profitable growth and increase shareholder value, while also motivating executives to perform at their highest levels despite interest rate volatility impacting the real estate markets. For 2023, corporate performance was weighted at 70%, and individual performance was weighted 30% for all of our NEOs.
The following table sets forth the performance metrics and goals approved by the Compensation Committee to determine corporate performance:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Metric | | Weighting | | Performance Hurdles | | Actual 2023
Performance | | Target Met |
| | Threshold
(50% Payout) | | Target
(100% Payout) | | Maximum
(150% Payout) | | |
| Adjusted EBITDA Growth | | 40% | | 7.50% | | 8.50% | | 9.00% | | 14.20% | | Maximum |
| Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA | | 30% | | 9.1x | | 8.85x | | 8.6x | | 8.8x | | Target |
| Same-Property NOI Growth | | 30% | | 3.00% | | 4.00% | | 5.00% | | 9.20% | | Maximum |
| | | | | |
| 2023 Performance Metrics | |
| Adjusted EBITDA Growth | •EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. •Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA excluding the impact of stock-based compensation expense, acquisition and pursuit costs, gain (loss) on sales of real estate, unrealized foreign currency gain (loss), change in fair value of financial instruments, impairment of real estate assets, lease termination revenue, non-recurring items and adjusted for non-controlling interest. •Adjusted EBITDA Growth is calculated as the percentage increase/(decrease) of current year Adjusted EBITDA less grant income over prior year’s Adjusted EBITDA less grant income. •We use Adjusted EBITDA Growth to measure and assess our earnings growth on an unleveraged basis. Moreover, it is an important and closely followed measure of our performance by the investing community and our stockholders. |
| Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA | •Net Debt is our consolidated short-term and long-term debt less our consolidated total and cash and cash equivalents. •Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA excluding the impact of stock-based compensation expense, acquisition and pursuit costs, gain (loss) on sales of real estate, unrealized foreign currency gain (loss), change in fair value of financial instruments, impairment of real estate assets, lease termination revenue, non-recurring items, and adjusted for non-controlling interest. •We believe Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA indicates the strength of our company’s balance sheet and reflects our ability to generate sufficient earnings to service our indebtedness over time. |
| Same-Property NOI Growth | •NOI is defined as net income (loss), computed in accordance with GAAP, generated from properties before general and administrative expenses, business acquisition expenses, depreciation and amortization, interest expense, gain or loss on dispositions, impairment of real estate investments, impairment of intangible assets and goodwill, income or loss from unconsolidated entities, gain on re-measurement of previously held equity interest, foreign currency gain or loss, other income, and income tax benefit or expense. •Same-Property NOI is NOI from assets held by us for one year or more. •Same-Property NOI Growth is calculated as the percentage increase/(decrease) of current year Same-Property NOI less grant income over prior year’s Same-Property NOI less grant income. •We consider Same-Property NOI Growth to be indicative of the organic growth embedded in our property portfolio, which ordinarily can be an important driver of property values. It also is a metric typically evaluated by investors and analysts and is used by many of our peers to evaluate operating performance. |
To determine individual performance, our Compensation Committee took into consideration the following 2023 key accomplishments by our Named Executive Officers:
| | | | | |
| Named Executive Officer | Key Accomplishments |
| Danny Prosky | •Led our success in reaching or exceeding our targets for EBITDA growth, same-property NOI growth and leverage ratios. •Implemented plans to achieve our overall strategic goals, focusing on maximizing the value of our real estate portfolio and ensuring that each department within our company has the talent and resources necessary to succeed. |
| | | | | |
| Named Executive Officer | Key Accomplishments |
| Danny Prosky — (Continued) | •Committed substantial time and effort mentoring, grooming and improving our investment and asset management teams and processes to strategically sell selective properties at attractive capitalization rates, improve the overall quality of the portfolio, increase same-property NOI and maintain high occupancy rates in the portfolio. •Served as a member of the Board of Directors of Trilogy, tasked with overseeing its continued recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. •Developed and maintained key external relationships with peers, material tenants, operators and other significant parties in the healthcare real estate space. •Committed substantial time meeting with and developing relationships with potential institutional investors in order to enhance their exposure to our company in anticipation of raising institutional capital. |
| Brian S. Peay | •Implemented proactive measures to protect and enhance our company’s balance sheet, liquidity and financial flexibility to support its business objectives. •2024 Offering Preparation •Assisted in the preparation and review of multiple filings with the SEC of our Registration Statement on Form S-11 in preparation for the 2024 Offering. •Led our efforts in preparing financial information and meeting with investment banking advisors and analysts, critical to execution of the 2024 Offering, resulting in the largest REIT public offering in connection with an exchange listing since 2018 (1). •Participated in multiple rounds of testing-the-waters meetings, both in-person and virtually, with potential institutional investors. •Improved our quarterly supplemental reporting package to be publicly filed with the SEC to support analysts’ and investors’ understanding of our business model and earnings. •Recruited and hired a Vice President of Investor Relations and Capital Markets instrumental in our messaging to analyst and investor communities. •Performed portfolio review meetings with each of our outpatient medical and long-term care asset management teams to understand key trends in the business and potential effects on earnings and cash flow. |
| Gabriel M. Willhite | •2024 Offering Preparation •Contributed significantly to the preparation of our Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed with the SEC in connection with the 2024 Offering, resulting in the largest REIT public offering in connection with an exchange listing since 2018 (1). •Led our efforts in preparing roadshow and testing-the-waters marketing materials in connection with the 2024 Offering. •Met with investors providing background on our company and its growth prospects. •Significant meetings with research analysts providing education on our company. |
| | | | | |
| Named Executive Officer | Key Accomplishments |
| Gabriel M. Willhite — (Continued) | •Trilogy •Was appointed to Chairman of the Board of Trilogy Investors, our single-largest investment. •Oversaw performance and investments made through Trilogy Investors which had 12.4% NOI growth in 2023. •Led negotiations securing a purchase option for the minority interest of Trilogy Investors owned by a joint venture partner in a highly flexible and complex structure that allows for flexibility around timing and consideration. •Information Technology •Oversaw the establishment of our cybersecurity committee and assumed the role of chairman of the committee. •Oversaw the implementation of advancements in our cybersecurity protocols, including the development of our Cybersecurity Incident Management Plan. •Human Resources •Led the reorganization of the human resources department that included identifying and hiring a new head of human resources and a new head of payroll. •Oversaw a significant improvement and advancements in human resources policies, including the first year of fully online performance reviews. •Investment committee •Served as a member of our investment committee that evaluates all significant company investments and dispositions. |
| Stefan K.L. Oh | •Assumed the position of Chief Investment Officer in March 2023. •Enhanced Portfolio Quality: Led our investment and asset management teams in a strategic effort to enhance the overall quality of the portfolio through selective disposition of properties, contributing to better same-property NOI performance and EBITDA growth. •Generated Sales Proceeds: Oversaw the sale of senior housing and medical outpatient buildings at attractive pricing, resulting in approximately $195 million in gross sales proceeds and enhancing our leverage metrics. •Risk Management and Performance Optimization: Collaborated with the asset management teams to manage risk and optimize portfolio performance. This included operator realignment, leasing initiatives, and strategies to mitigate potential downside risks, including the conversion of two senior housing leased portfolios to SHOP. •Investment Structuring: Actively participated in structuring and negotiating the purchase option for the minority-held investment interest of Trilogy. •Stakeholder Relationships: Established and nurtured essential external connections with peers, tenants, operators, capital markets professionals, and other important stakeholders within the healthcare real estate industry. |
| Mark E. Foster | •Actively managed and reduced outside counsel legal expenses through fixed-fee arrangements, implementation of standard fee reductions and negotiation of legal fees where appropriate. •Successfully reduced legal expenses by hiring a new corporate attorney to reduce the use of outside counsel on certain corporate, securities and transactional matters. |
| | | | | |
| Named Executive Officer | Key Accomplishments |
| Mark E. Foster — (Continued) | •Oversaw updates to various corporate forms to mitigate potential exposure to risk, reduce unanticipated expenses, and align economic incentives at the asset level. •Provided legal support for human resource-related matters, including the transition of certain key personnel. •Conducted a review and assessment of corporate policies and procedures to identify necessary updates or new policy implementation in anticipation of the 2024 Offering. •Actively managed potential regulatory and compliance-related matters to minimize our risks. •Direct involvement with respect to SEC filings related to the 2024 Offering. •Worked closely with our business teams on strategic transactions, including: (i) an option to acquire the remaining interests in Trilogy; (ii) the disposition of non-strategic assets; (iii) appointment of a receiver with respect to assets in Oregon; (iv) various financing transactions; (v) tenant lease restructurings and operational transitions, and (vi) other strategic corporate transactions. •Oversaw and provided strategic input with respect to asset-based litigation and pending business disputes. |
___________
(1) Nareit. (2024) Historical IPOs. Retrieved from www.reit.com/data-research/reit-market-data/reit-capital-offerings
Based on its assessment of our corporate performance and each NEO’s individual performance and respective weightings described above, the Compensation Committee approved cash bonuses for 2023 in the following amounts:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2023 Cash Bonus |
| Named Executive Officer | | Payout | | As a % of Target |
| Danny Prosky | | $ | 949,500 | | | 126.6% |
| Brian S. Peay | | $ | 601,350 | | | 126.6% |
| Gabriel M. Willhite | | $ | 538,050 | | | 126.6% |
| Stefan K.L. Oh | | $ | 379,800 | | | 126.6% |
| Mark E. Foster | | $ | 296,244 | | | 126.6% |
Long-Term Incentive Program (Equity-Based Compensation)
As part of our compensation program, our NEOs are entitled to receive equity-based compensation. To encourage retention and alignment with our long-term growth and performance, 25% of such equity-based awards are performance-based and the remaining 75% of such awards are time-based.
Our NEOs received the following equity awards in 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Equity Awards |
| Named Executive Officer | | Time-Based
RSUs (#) (1) | | Performance-Based
RSUs (#) (2) | | Aggregate Grant Date
Value ($) (3) |
| Danny Prosky | | 47,771 | | 15,923 | | 1,999,991 |
| Brian S. Peay | | 20,303 | | 6,767 | | 849,998 |
| Gabe M. Willhite | | 20,303 | | 6,767 | | 849,998 |
| Stefan K.L. Oh | | 9,554 | | 3,185 | | 400,005 |
| Mark E. Foster | | 8,957 | | 2,986 | | 375,010 |
___________
(1) The number of time-based RSUs granted to the NEOs was determined based on the value of the equity awards determined by the Compensation Committee, divided by our estimated net asset value per share of Class T common stock of $31.40 available as of April 2023, rounded to the nearest whole share. These time-based RSUs vest in one-third annual increments, subject to each NEO’s continued service through the applicable vesting date.
(2) The number of performance-based RSUs subject to the award was determined based on the value of the equity awards determined by the Compensation Committee, divided by our net asset value per share of our Class T common stock of $31.40 available as of April 2023, rounded to the nearest whole share.
(3) Reflects the value of the NEOs’ respective equity award determined by the Compensation Committee was based on market data, consultation with FPC, NEO responsibilities and historical compensation practices
The performance-based RSUs will cliff vest in the first quarter of 2026 (subject to continuous employment or provision of services through that vesting date), with the amount of RSUs then vesting to be based on our Normalized FFO per share ranking over the three-year period ending December 31, 2025 versus a company peer group comprised of: CareTrust REIT, Inc., Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated, LTC Properties Inc., National Health Investors, Inc., Physicians Realty Trust, Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. and Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc., which peer group may be modified at the sole direction of our board or the Compensation Committee prior to the end of the three-year performance period to reflect changed circumstances such as the merger out of existence or significant portfolio modifications of such companies. Each NEO will vest into 50% of the RSUs subject to this grant if we achieve a “threshold” level of Normalized FFO per share, which is Normalized FFO-per-share performance that is 2.5% less than the peer group’s Normalized FFO-per-share performance (with no RSUs vesting if our Normalized FFO-per-share performance is worse than this amount); 100% of the RSUs if we achieve “target” performance, which is Normalized FFO-per-share performance equal to the peer group’s Normalized FFO-per-share performance; and 200% of the RSUs if we achieve “maximum” performance, which is Normalized FFO-per-share performance that is 2.5% or greater than the peer group’s Normalized FFO-per-share performance. There will be linear interpolation between Normalized FFO-per-share performance levels.
The following chart illustrates the terms of the 2023 performance-based award to the NEOs:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
25% of
LTIP | Performance-
Based Restricted
Stock Units | | Normalized FFO per Share | Payout % |
| Threshold | 2.5% Less than Peer Group | 50% |
| Target | Equal to Peer Group | 100% |
| Maximum | 2.5% Greater than Peer Group | 200% |
In 2023, the performance measure used for the Long-Term Incentive Program was Normalized FFO compared to modified FFO attributable to controlling interest, or Modified FFO, in 2022 to adopt a performance measure more closely aligned with that of our publicly listed REIT peers.
See Part III, Item 11, Executive Compensation — Executive Compensation Tables — 2023 Option Exercises and Stock Vested, for more information.
Risk Mitigation
Our executive compensation program is designed to achieve an appropriate balance between risk and reward that does not incentivize excessive risk-taking. Our Compensation Committee, in conjunction with FPC, conducts an annual risk assessment of our executive compensation program. As noted above, the Compensation Committee oversees, among other things, the assessment and management of risks related to our incentive compensation plans and equity-based incentive plan generally and whether our incentive compensation arrangements encourage excessive risk taking. We believe that our annual cash bonus program and equity compensation program contain appropriate risk mitigation factors, as summarized below:
•balance of short-term and long-term incentives through annual cash bonuses and long-term equity compensation;
•a substantial portion of total compensation is in the form of long-term equity awards;
•a substantial portion of total compensation is based on achievement of performance objectives, through a combination of annual or multi-year performance. Furthermore, we incorporate both absolute and relative metrics by which to assess our performance;
•three-year vesting based on continued service as of the vesting date; and
•prohibition against hedging or pledging transactions.
Other Plans, Perquisites and Personal Benefits
Each of our NEOs is eligible to participate in our Executive Severance and Change in Control Plan, or our severance plan, as described below, and all of our compensatory and benefit plans on the same basis as our other employees. We provide an employer 50.0% matching contribution under our 401(k) profit sharing plan up to 5.0% of a participating employee’s contribution, including our NEO’s, taxable compensation, up to the Internal Revenue Service limitations for matching contributions.
Tax and Accounting Considerations
We have not provided or agreed to provide any of our executive officers or directors with a gross-up or other reimbursement for tax amounts they might pay pursuant to Section 4999 or Section 409A of the Code. Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code provide that executive officers, directors who hold significant stockholder interests, and certain other service providers could be subject to significant additional taxes if they receive payments or benefits in connection with a change in control of us that exceed certain limits, and that we or our successor could lose a deduction on the amounts subject to the additional taxes. Section 409A also imposes additional significant taxes on the individual in the event that an employee, director or service provider receives “deferred compensation” that does not meet the requirements of Section 409A.
Hedging Practices
Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits our directors and executive officers from entering into hedging or monetization transactions or similar arrangements with respect to our securities.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Other than Mr. Hanson, no memberThe Compensation Committee is currently composed of our board during the year ended December 31, 2020 has servedindependent directors listed as an officer, and no member of our board served as an employee, of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV, Inc. or any of our subsidiaries. Because we do not have a compensation committee, signatories to the below Compensation Committee Report. During 2023:
•none of our executive officers participatedwere a director of another entity where one of that entity’s executive officers served on the Compensation Committee;
•no member of the Compensation Committee was formerly an officer or employee of us or any of our subsidiaries;
•no member of the Compensation Committee entered into any transaction with us in any deliberations regarding executive compensation. Other than Mr. Hanson, duringwhich the year ended December 31, 2020, amount involved exceeded $120,000;
•none of our executive officers served on the compensation committee of any entity where one of that entity’s executive officers served on the Compensation Committee; and
•none of our executive officers served on the compensation committee of another entity where one of that entity’s executive officers served as a director or member of a compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member ofon our board or compensation committee.board.
Option/SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year
No option grants were made to our officers or directors for the year ended December 31, 2020.2023.
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the information required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K and contained in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and, based on such review and discussions, recommended to our board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Submitted by the Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors:
Dianne Hurley (Chairwoman)
Marvin R. O’Quinn
Valerie Richardson
The preceding “Compensation Committee Report” shall not be deemed soliciting material or to be filed with the SEC, nor shall any information in this report be incorporated by reference into any past or future filing under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except to the extent that American Healthcare REIT specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.
Executive Compensation Tables
2023 Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth a summary of all compensation earned, awarded or paid, as applicable, to our NEOs in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 and to the extent required by SEC executive compensation disclosure rules, December 31, 2021.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name and Principal Location | | Year | | Salary ($) | | Bonus
($) (1) | | Stock
awards
($) (2) | | Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($) (1) | | All other
compensation
($) (3) | | Total ($) |
| Danny Prosky | | 2023 | | 750,000 | | 225,000 | | 1,999,991 | | 724,500 | | 85,189 | | 3,784,680 |
| Chief Executive Officer and President | | 2022 | | 750,000 | | 225,000 | | — | | 787,500 | | 61,855 | | 1,824,355 |
| 2021 | | 187,500 | | — | | 2,000,003 | | 187,500 | | 23,040 | | 2,398,043 |
| Brian S. Peay | | 2023 | | 475,000 | | 142,500 | | 849,998 | | 458,850 | | 58,601 | | 1,984,949 |
| Chief Financial Officer | | 2022 | | 475,000 | | 142,500 | | — | | | 498,750 | | 51,011 | | 1,167,261 |
| | 2021 | | 118,750 | | — | | | 1,387,555 | | 118,750 | | 24,423 | | 1,649,478 |
| Gabriel M. Willhite | | 2023 | | 425,000 | | 127,500 | | 849,998 | | 410,550 | | 52,409 | | 1,865,457 |
| Chief Operating Officer(4) | | 2022 | | 384,000 | | 127,500 | | — | | 446,250 | | 35,366 | | 993,116 |
| | 2021 | | 90,000 | | — | | 1,061,591 | | 58,500 | | 15,549 | | 1,225,640 |
| Stefan K.L. Oh | | 2023 | | 400,000 | | 90,000 | | 400,005 | | 289,800 | | 41,803 | | 1,221,608 |
| Chief Investment Officer | | 2022 | | 400,000 | | 130,000 | | — | | | 195,000 | | 39,487 | | 764,487 |
| | 2021 | | 100,000 | | — | | | 962,550 | | 65,000 | | 18,559 | | 1,146,109 |
| Mark E. Foster | | 2023 | | 360,000 | | 70,200 | | 375,010 | | 226,044 | | 17,265 | | 1,048,519 |
| Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary(5) | | 2022 | | 135,000 | | 70,200 | | 156,248 | | 245,700 | | 4,261 | | 611,409 |
| 2021 | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
___________
(1) Represents amount paid under the short-term incentive program for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, with the portion in the Bonus column reflecting the individual component of the 2023 short-term incentive program and the portion in the Non-Equity Incentive Compensation column representing the formulaic payout based on the achievement of pre-established performance goals. See Part III, Item 11, Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Short-Term Incentive Program (Cash Bonuses) for more information.
(2) The time-based RSUs and performance-based RSUs were awarded and granted in April 2023 under our incentive plan. The performance-based RSUs are calculated assuming target achievement (the most probable outcome at the time of grant) of the underlying performance condition at the time of grant. Assuming maximum achievement of the underlying performance condition at the time of grant, the grant date fair value of the 2023 performance-based RSUs granted to the NEOs would be as follows: Mr. Prosky, $999,964; Mr. Peay, $424,968; Mr. Willhite, $424,968; Mr. Oh, $200,018; and Mr. Foster, $187,521. See Part III, Item 11, Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Incentive Program (Equity-Based Compensation) for additional information regarding these awards.
(3) Amounts in the “All other compensation” column consist of the following payments we paid to or on behalf of the NEOs:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | 401(k) Contributions ($) | | Distributions Paid on Awards ($) |
| Danny Prosky | | 7,979 | | 77,210 |
| Brian S. Peay | | 7,975 | | 50,626 |
| Gabriel M. Willhite | | 8,013 | | 44,396 |
| Stefan K.L. Oh | | 8,033 | | 33,770 |
| Mark E. Foster | | 7,242 | | 10,023 |
(4) Mr. Willhite transitioned from his position as Executive Vice President, General Counsel to Chief Operating Officer, effective August 1, 2022; therefore, the amount of Mr. Willhite’s 2022 salary is based on the two positions he held in 2022.
(5) Mr. Foster was appointed as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel effective August 1, 2022, therefore his 2022 salary is pro-rated and he did not receive any compensation in 2021.
2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table summarizes all grants of plan-based awards made to our NEOs in 2023.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-
Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1) | | Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2) | | All other
stock
awards:
Number of
shares of
stock or
units (#)(3) | | Grant date
fair value of
stock and
option
awards ($) |
| Name | | Grant
Date | | Threshold
($) | | Target ($) | | Maximum
($) | | Threshold
(#) | | Target (#) | | Maximum
(#) | | |
| Danny Prosky | | | | 78,750 | | 525,000 | | 787,500 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 4/3/2023 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 47,771 | | 1,500,009 |
| | 4/3/2023 | | | | | | | | 7,962 | | 15,923 | | 31,846 | | | | 499,982 |
| Brian S. Peay | | | | 49,875 | | 332,500 | | 498,750 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 4/3/2023 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 20,303 | | 637,514 |
| | 4/3/2023 | | | | | | | | 3,384 | | 6,767 | | 13,534 | | | | 212,484 |
| Gabriel M. Willhite | | | | 44,625 | | 297,500 | | 446,250 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 4/3/2023 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 20,303 | | 637,514 |
| | 4/3/2023 | | | | | | | | 3,384 | | 6,767 | | 13,534 | | | | 212,484 |
| Stefan K.L. Oh | | | | 31,500 | | 210,000 | | 315,000 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 4/3/2023 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9,554 | | 299,996 |
| | 4/3/2023 | | | | | | | | 1,593 | | 3,185 | | 6,370 | | | | 100,009 |
| Mark E. Foster | | | | 24,570 | | 163,800 | | 245,700 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 4/3/2023 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8,957 | | 281,250 |
| | 4/3/2023 | | | | | | | | 1,493 | | 2,986 | | 5,972 | | | | 93,760 |
___________
(1) Represents bonus opportunities for 2023 corporate performance under the short-term incentive program as approved by the Compensation Committee on April 3, 2023. The actual amount awarded will based on the achievement of certain performance measures as described under Part III, Item 11, Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Short-Term Incentive Program (Cash Bonuses). Excluded from these columns will be the discretionary portion of the 2023 bonus program, which are reflected in the “Bonus” column in the 2023 Summary Compensation Table.
(2) Represents performance-based RSUs that will cliff vest in the first quarter of 2026 (subject to continuous employment or provision of services through that vesting date), with the amount of RSUs then vesting to be based on our relative Normalized FFO per share ranking over the three-year period ending December 31, 2025 versus a company peer group. The grant date fair value was measured based on the achievement of Normalized FFO per share performance at the target level (the most probable outcome as of the grant date), multiplied by our estimated net asset value per share of Class T common stock in effect on the grant date of $31.40.
(3) Represents time-based RSUs determined based on the value of the equity awards determined by the Compensation Committee, divided by our estimated net asset value per share of Class T common stock of $31.40 available as of April 2023, rounded to the nearest whole share. These time-based RSUs will vest in equal annual installments, with the first one-third installment vesting on April 3, 2024, the second one-third installment vesting on April 3, 2025 and the final
one-third installment vesting on April 3, 2026 (subject to continuous employment or provision of services through each vesting date).
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End December 31, 2023
The following table presents information about our NEOs’ outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2023. The market value of such outstanding equity awards is based on our estimated net asset value per share of Class T common stock available as of December 31, 2023 of $31.40.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Stock awards |
| Name | | Number of shares or units
of stock that have not
vested (#) (1) | | Market value of shares or
units that have not vested
($) (1) | | Equity incentive plan
awards: number of
unearned shares, units or
other rights that have not
vested (#) (2) | | Equity incentive plan
awards: market or payout
value of unearned shares,
units or other rights that
have not vested ($) (2) |
| Danny Prosky | | 61,330 | | 1,925,762 | | 29,481 | | 925,703 |
| Brian S. Peay | | 42,675 | | 1,339,995 | | 11,851 | | 372,121 |
| Gabriel M. Willhite | | 41,462 | | 1,301,907 | | 9,309 | | 292,303 |
| Stefan K.L. Oh | | 29,045 | | 912,013 | | 5,388 | | 169,183 |
| Mark E. Foster | | 11,060 | | 347,284 | | 4,037 | | 126,762 |
___________
(1) Represents (a) restricted shares of Class T common stock that will vest in equal annual installments, with the first one-third installment vested on October 1, 2022, the second one-third installment vested on October 1, 2023 and the final one-third installment vesting on October 1, 2024 (Mr. Prosky, 13,559 restricted shares, Mr. Peay, 5,084 restricted shares, Mr. Willhite, 2,542 restricted shares, and Mr. Oh, 2,203 restricted shares) (subject to continuous employment or provision of services through each vesting date), except in the case of Mr. Foster as described below, (b) in the case of Messrs. Peay, Oh and Willhite, retention grants of restricted shares of Class T common stock that will vest on October 4, 2024 (Mr. Peay, 17,288 restricted shares, Mr. Willhite, 18,617 restricted shares, and Mr. Oh, 17,288 restricted shares) (subject to continuous employment or provision of services through the vesting date), (c) in the case of Mr. Foster, restricted shares of Class T common stock that will vest in three equal annual installments, with the first one-third installment vested on January 1, 2023, the second one-third installment vested on January 1, 2024 and the final one-third installment vesting on January 1, 2025 (2,103 restricted shares) (subject to continuous employment or provision of services through each vesting date), and (d) time-based RSUs that will vest in equal installments, with the first one-third installment vested on April 3, 2023, the second one-third installment vesting on April 3, 2024 and the final one-third installment vesting on April 3, 2025 (Mr. Prosky, 47,771 RSUs, Mr. Peay, 20,303 RSUs, Mr. Willhite, 20,303 RSUs, Mr. Oh, 9,554 RSUs, and Mr. Foster, 8,957 RSUs) (subject to continuous employment or provision of services through each vesting date).
(2) Represents (a) performance-based RSUs that will cliff vest in the first quarter of 2025 (subject to continuous employment or provision of services through that vesting date), which RSUs are scheduled to vest based on our Modified FFO performance (Mr. Prosky, 13,558 RSUs, Mr. Peay, 5,084 RSUs, Mr. Willhite, 2,542 RSUs, Mr. Oh, 2,203 RSUs, and Mr. Foster, 1,051 RSUs), and (b) performance-based RSUs that will cliff vest in the first quarter of 2026 (subject to continuous employment or provision of services through that vesting date), which RSUs are scheduled to vest based on our Normalized FFO performance (Mr. Prosky, 15,923 RSUs, Mr. Peay, 6,767 RSUs, Mr. Willhite, 6,767 RSUs, Mr. Oh, 3,185 RSUs, and Mr. Foster, 2,986 RSUs). Because our Modified FFO and Normalized FFO performance for purposes of these awards is not calculable as of the date of this filing, we have assumed performance at the target performance level (100% payout level) for purposes of this table.
2023 Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table sets forth, for each of our NEOs, the number of shares of our common stock that vested in 2023 as well as the value of those shares upon vesting. The value realized upon vesting is based on the estimated net asset value per share of Class T common stock available at the time of vesting.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Stock awards |
| Name | | Number of shares acquired
on vesting (#) | | Value realized on vesting
($) |
| Danny Prosky | | 13,557 | | 425,690 |
| Brian S. Peay | | 5,084 | | 159,638 |
| Gabriel M. Willhite | | 2,542 | | 79,819 |
| Stefan K.L. Oh | | 2,203 | | 69,174 |
| Mark E. Foster | | 1,051 | | 39,055 |
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
We adopted our severance plan for the purpose of providing severance and change-of-control protections to certain key employees, including our NEOs. As described below, our severance plan provides our NEOs with, among other things, base salary, bonus and certain other payments at, following and/or in connection with certain terminations of employment or a change in control involving us. As used below, the terms “Cause,” “Change in Control,” “Disability” and “Good Reason” shall have the respective meanings set forth in our severance plan.
Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason
Under our severance plan, in the event a participant is terminated without Cause or resigns for Good Reason, such participant will be entitled to receive the following, including any accrued obligations entitled to such participant:
•a severance payment in an amount equal to: (1) 2.0 if the participant is our Chief Executive Officer, 1.5 if the participant is our Executive Chairman, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Head of Acquisitions/Chief Investment Officer or General Counsel, or 1.0 if the participant holds another position; multiplied by (2) the sum of: (a) such participant’s base salary, plus (b) such participant’s average cash bonus for the three most recent years completed prior to the termination, payable in equal installments in accordance with our normal payroll practices, commencing 60 days following the termination date;
•for a period of time ending on the earlier to occur of (1) the completion of the applicable severance period as provided in our severance plan, and (2) the date on which the participant becomes eligible to receive healthcare coverage from a subsequent employer, medical coverage through our group medical plans pursuant to the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as amended, at the same levels as would have applied if the participant’s employment had not been terminated or reimbursement of the cost of such medical coverage;
•any retention equity grants granted to the participant that are unvested as of the termination date shall vest and, if applicable, become exercisable and any other unvested restricted stock or other equity awards issued to the participant under our incentive plan or otherwise by us that are outstanding on the termination date and that vest solely based on the passage of time, or, each, a Time-Based Award, shall vest and become exercisable, if applicable, as to the number of shares subject to such award that would have vested over the 12-month period following the termination date had the participant remained employed; and
•any performance-based vesting award issued to the participant under our incentive plan or otherwise by us, or, each, a Performance-Based Award, that remains outstanding on the termination date shall remain outstanding and eligible to be earned following the completion of the performance period based on the actual achievement of applicable performance goals, and to the extent earned (if at all) shall vest on a pro rata basis based on the number of days the participant remained employed from the commencement of the performance period through the termination date.
Change in Control Followed by Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason
In the event a Change in Control occurs:
•any Time-Based Award that is then outstanding shall vest and, if applicable, become exercisable immediately prior to the Change in Control subject to the participant’s continued employment until immediately prior to such Change in Control;
•any Performance-Based Award that is then outstanding and that is not continued, converted, assumed or replaced with a substantially similar award by us or a successor entity in connection with the Change in Control (in each case, such award being considered assumed, or Assumed), shall vest and, if applicable, become exercisable immediately prior to the Change in Control based on actual achievement of the applicable performance goals through the date of the Change in Control, as determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee prior to consummation of the Change in Control; and
•if, during the period beginning on the date of the Change in Control and continuing through the twelve (12) month period following such Change in Control, a participant is terminated without Cause (other than by reason of the death or Disability of such participant) or a participant resigns for Good Reason, such participant shall be entitled to receive each of the following, including any accrued obligations entitled to such participant:
◦a Change in Control severance payment, in an amount equal to: (1) 2.5 if the participant is our Chief Executive Officer, or 2.0 if the participant is not our Chief Executive Officer; multiplied by (2) the sum of: (a) the participant’s base salary; plus (b) the participant’s average cash bonus for the three most recent years completed prior to the termination, which amount shall be paid to the participant in a lump sum within 60 days following the termination date;
◦continuing medical coverage or a corresponding payment as described under “—Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason”; and
◦any Performance-Based Award that was Assumed in connection with such Change in Control and that remains unvested on the termination date shall, to the extent such award remains subject to performance-based vesting as of the termination date, remain outstanding and eligible to be earned following the completion of the performance period based on the actual achievement of applicable performance goals, and to the extent earned (if at all) shall vest on a pro rata basis based on the number of days the participant remained employed from the commencement of the performance period through the termination date.
Termination Other Than Without Cause or Resignation Other Than for Good Reason
In the event that a participant is terminated for any reason other than as set forth above, such participant shall be entitled to receive from us the accrued obligations entitled to such participant and, if such termination is due to the participant’s death or Disability: (1) an amount equal to 0.5 multiplied by such participant’s base salary, which amount shall be paid to the participant (or, if applicable, the participant’s beneficiary or to such participant’s estate, if a participant fails to make a beneficiary designation), in equal installments in accordance with our normal payroll practices for a period of six months after the termination date starting within 60 days following the termination date; (2) the participant’s annual cash performance bonus for the year in which the termination date occurs, as determined by the Compensation Committee based on target performance for the performance period and pro-rated for the number of days from the performance period commencement to the termination date, payable at its normal time (but in no event later than March 15 of the year following the year in which the termination date occurs); (3) all unvested Time-Based Awards shall vest and become exercisable, if applicable, as to the number of shares subject to such award that would have vested (and become exercisable) over the 12-month period following the termination date had the participant remained employed; and (4) any Performance-Based Awards shall remain outstanding and eligible to be earned following the completion of the performance period based on the actual achievement of applicable performance goals and, to the extent earned (if at all), shall vest on a pro rata basis based on the number of days the participant remained employed from the commencement of the performance period through the termination date.
The following table presents the amount of compensation payable to each of our NEOs as if the triggering termination event described above and pursuant to our severance plan had occurred on December 31, 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Benefit | | Termination
Without Cause or
Resignation for
Good Reason ($) | | Termination
Without Cause or
Resignation for
Good Reason
within 12 months
following Change
in Control ($) | | Death or
Disability ($) |
| Danny Prosky | | Severance Payment | | 3,308,000 | | 4,135,000 | | 1,324,500 |
| | Medical Coverage (1) | | 60,543 | | 75,679 | | 15,136 |
| | Accelerated Vesting of Time-Based Awards | | 925,735 | | 1,925,762 | | 925,735 |
| | Accelerated Vesting of Performance-Based Awards | | 925,703 | | 925,703 | | 925,703 |
| Brian S. Peay | | Severance Payment | | 1,571,300 | | 2,095,067 | | 838,850 |
| | Medical Coverage (1) | | 45,408 | | 60,543 | | 15,136 |
| | Accelerated Vesting of Time-Based Awards | | 914,933 | | 1,339,995 | | 914,933 |
| | Accelerated Vesting of Performance-Based Awards | | 372,121 | | 372,121 | | 372,121 |
| Gabriel M. Willhite | | Severance Payment | | 1,310,400 | | 1,747,200 | | 750,550 |
| | Medical Coverage (1) | | — | | — | | — |
| | Accelerated Vesting of Time-Based Awards | | 876,876 | | 1,301,907 | | 876,876 |
| | Accelerated Vesting of Performance-Based Awards | | 292,303 | | 292,303 | | 292,303 |
| Stefan K.L. Oh | | Severance Payment | | 1,082,400 | | 1,443,200 | | 579,800 |
| | Medical Coverage (1) | | 45,408 | | 60,543 | | 15,136 |
| | Accelerated Vesting of Time-Based Awards | | 711,964 | | 912,013 | | 711,964 |
| | Accelerated Vesting of Performance-Based Awards | | 169,183 | | 169,183 | | 169,183 |
| Mark E. Foster | | Severance Payment | | 999,108 | | 1,332,144 | | 476,244 |
| | Medical Coverage (1) | | 32,464 | | 43,285 | | 10,821 |
| | Accelerated Vesting of Time-Based Awards | | 126,730 | | 347,284 | | 126,730 |
| | Accelerated Vesting of Performance-Based Awards | | 126,762 | | 126,762 | | 126,762 |
___________
(1) Represents the cost of medical insurance coverage for each NEO at the same annual level as in effect immediately preceding December 31, 2023 for a period of time equal to the applicable multiple set forth in our severance plan. Such amounts are paid in equal installments over an annual period equal to the respective severance multiple (i.e., 2.5 years, 2 years, 1.5 years or 1 year). A lesser amount may be due if the NEO becomes eligible to receive healthcare coverage from a subsequent employer.
Listing Equity Awards
Our board granted 625,926 shares of restricted common stock to our NEOs pursuant to our incentive plan upon completion of the 2024 Offering, or the Listing Equity Awards. The Listing Equity Awards vest ratably over four years and are subject to continuous service through the vesting dates.
CEO Pay Ratio
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, presented below is the ratio of annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, to the annual total compensation of our median employee (excluding our CEO). The ratio presented below is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
To identify the “median employee” from our employee population, we determined the annual total compensation of each of our employees as of December 31, 2023 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K. We annualized base wages of any permanent employees who were employed for less than the full year or on unpaid leave during 2023, and we did not otherwise annualize or make any cost-of-living or other adjustments to employee compensation. Our employee population, including all full- and part-time employees, as of December 31, 2023 consisted of approximately 108 individuals, all of whom were located in the United States.
For 2023, our last completed fiscal year, annual total compensation as determined under Item 402 of Regulation S-K for our CEO was $3,784,680, as disclosed on page 95.The 2023 annual total compensation as determined under Item 402 of Regulation S-K for our median employee was $122,976. Based on this information, the ratio of our CEO's annual total compensation to our median employee's annual total compensation for fiscal year 2023 is 30.8 to 1. The SEC's rules for calculating the required pay ratio permit companies to use reasonable estimates and assumptions in their methodologies, and companies have different employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, pay ratios reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above.
Director Compensation
If a director is also one of our executive officers,employees, we do not pay any additional compensation to that person for services rendered as a director. Our director compensation program is designed with the goals of attracting and retaining highly qualified individuals to serve as independent directors and to fairly compensate them for their time and efforts. In 2023, our board reviewed and approved the director compensation program adjustments described below after considering input from FPC (as defined below), the independent compensation consultant retained by the Compensation Committee to advise on executive officer and director compensation. For the year ended December 31, 2020,2023, our independent directors received the following forms of compensation:
•Annual Retainer. Our independent directors receive an aggregate annual retainer of $65,000, which is paid on a quarterly basis at the commencement of each quarter for which an individual serves as an independent director. In addition, the chairman or chairwoman of the audit committee receives an additional aggregate annual retainer of $10,000, which is paid on a quarterly basis at the commencement of each quarter for which an individual serves as the chairman or chairwoman of the audit committee.
•Special Committee Fees. Our special committee members receive an initial retainer of $60,000 payable in one lump sum and a monthly retainer of $10,000 payable monthly in arrears; provided that such fee for the month of October 2020 was prorated from the date the special committee was established. Additionally, the chairwoman of the special committee receives a monthly retainer of $7,500, payable monthly in arrears; provided that such fee for the month of October 2020 was prorated from the date the chairwoman was appointed.
•Meeting Fees. Our independent directors receive $1,500 for each board or special committee meeting attended in person or by telephone and $500 for each audit committee meeting attended in person or by telephone, which is paid monthly in arrears. The chairman or chairwoman of each committee, other than the audit committee chairman or chairwoman, also may receive additional compensation. If a board meeting is held on the same day as an audit committee meeting, an additional fee will not be paid for attending the committee meeting.
•Equity Compensation. In connection with their initial election to our board, each independent director receives 5,000 shares of restricted Class T common stock pursuant to the 2015 Incentive Plan, or our incentive plan, and an additional 2,500 shares of restricted Class T common stock pursuant to our incentive plan in connection with his or her subsequent re-election each year, provided that such person is an independent director as of the date of his or her re-election and continually served as an independent director during such period. Additionally, on July 1, 2020, we granted each of our independent directors an additional 5,000 shares of restricted Class T common stock pursuant to our incentive plan in consideration of their past services rendered. The restricted shares vest as to 20.0% of the shares on the date of grant and on each anniversary thereafter over four years from the date of grant.
•Other Compensation. We reimburse our directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings, including committee meetings, of our board. | | | | | |
| Type of fee | 2023 Amount |
| |
| Annual Cash Retainer | |
•All non-employee directors | •$85,000 annually, paid quarterly |
•Additional Audit Committee Chairperson fee | •$20,000 annually, paid quarterly |
•Additional Audit Committee Member fee | •$5,000 annually, paid quarterly |
•Additional Compensation Committee or Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairperson fee | •$12,500 annually, paid quarterly |
•Additional Non-Executive Chairman of the Board fee | •$100,000 annually, paid quarterly |
| |
| Equity Compensation | |
•In connection with the initial election or subsequent re-election each year, each non-employee director receives an amount of restricted Class T common stock pursuant to our incentive plan that fully vests one year from the date of grant, subject to their continued service as a non-employee director and prorated for their term of service | •Prior to June 15, 2023, $85,000 annually •Effective as of June 15, 2023, $95,000 annually |
| |
| Other Compensation | •Reimbursement of out-of- pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board meetings or Board Committee meetings. Such reimbursement is paid monthly. Our independent directors do not receive other benefits from us. |
2023 Director Compensation
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our director compensation for non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2020:2023.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
($)(1) | | Stock
Awards
($)(2) | | Option
Awards
($) | | Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($) | | Change in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($) | | All Other
Compensation
($) | | Total
($) |
| Jeffrey T. Hanson(3) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Richard S. Welch(3) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Brian J. Flornes | | 190,000 | | | 71,500 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 14,000(4) | | 275,500 | |
| Dianne Hurley | | 220,000 | | | 71,500 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 16,000(4) | | 307,500 | |
| Wilbur H. Smith III | | 188,500 | | | 71,500 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 16,000(4) | | 276,000 | |
___________
(1)Consists of the amounts described below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Director | | Role | | Annual Retainer
($) | | Meeting Fees
($) | | Additional
Special Payments
($) |
| Hanson | | Chairman of the Board of Directors | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Welch | | Director | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Flornes | | Member, Audit and Special Committees | | 65,000 | | | 24,000 | | | 101,000(a) |
| Hurley | | Chairwoman, Audit and Special Committees | | 75,000 | | | 24,000 | | | 121,000(a) |
| Smith | | Member, Audit and Special Committees | | 65,000 | | | 22,500 | | | 101,000(a) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Fees Earned or Paid
in Cash
($) (1) | | Stock Awards
($)(2) | | All Other
Compensation
($) (3) | | Total ($) |
| Jeffrey T. Hanson (4) | | 185,000 | | 94,985 | | 1,513 | | 281,498 |
| Danny Prosky | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| Mathieu B. Streiff (4) | | 85,000 | | 94,985 | | 1,513 | | 181,498 |
| Scott A. Estes | | 100,000 | | 94,985 | | 3,595 | | 198,580 |
| Brian J. Flornes | | 102,500 | | 94,985 | | 16,856 | | 214,341 |
| Harold H. Greene (5) | | 51,250 | | 82,738 | | 11,651 | | 145,639 |
| Dianne Hurley | | 106,250 | | 94,985 | | 18,026 | | 219,261 |
| Marvin R. O’Quinn (6) | | 82,875 | | 131,327 | | 2,246 | | 216,448 |
| Valerie Richardson (6) | | 82,875 | | 131,327 | | 2,246 | | 216,448 |
| Gerald W. Robinson (5) | | 42,500 | | 82,738 | | 9,761 | | 134,999 |
| J. Grayson Sanders (5) | | 42,500 | | 82,738 | | 9,812 | | 135,050 |
| Wilbur H. Smith III | | 85,000 | | 94,985 | | 19,148 | | 199,133 |
___________
(a) Comprised of the initial and monthly retainer fees paid to members of the special committee.
(2)The amounts(1) Amounts reported in this column represent the annual retainer received by each individual who served as a non-employee director during 2023.
(2) Amounts reported in this column represent (a) the grant date fair value of the awards granted forto the non-employee directors other than Messrs. Greene, Robinson and Sanders during the year ended December 31, 2020,2023, as determined in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation, or FASB ASC Topic 718.
The following table shows718, based on the sharesestimated net asset value per share of $37.16 or $31.40, as applicable, for our restricted Class T common stock awarded to each director foras of the year ended December 31, 2020,date of grant and (b) in the grant datecase of Messrs. Greene, Robinson and Sanders, the incremental fair value for each award (computed in accordance withunder FASB ASC Topic 718):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Director | | Grant Date | | Number of Shares of
Our Restricted Class T
Common Stock | | Full Grant Date
Fair Value of Award
($) |
| Hanson | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Welch | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Flornes | | 06/09/20 and 07/01/20 | | 7,500 | | | 71,500 | |
| Hurley | | 06/09/20 and 07/01/20 | | 7,500 | | | 71,500 | |
| Smith | | 06/09/20 and 07/01/20 | | 7,500 | | | 71,500 | |
their outstanding equity awards in connection with their retirements to provide for accelerated vesting of the unvested portion of their outstanding equity awards. The following table shows the aggregate number of nonvested shares of our restricted Class T common stock held by each non-employee director as of December 31, 2020:2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Director | | Number of Nonvested Shares of
Class T
Common |
| Hanson | | 3,025 |
| Prosky | | — |
| Streiff | | 3,025 |
WelchEstes | | — 3,025 | |
| Flornes | | 15,000 3,400 |
| Greene | | — |
| Hurley | | 15,000 3,400 |
| O’Quinn | | 3,025 |
| Richardson | | 3,025 |
| Robinson | | — |
| Sanders | | — |
| Smith | | 15,000 3,400 | |
(3)Mr. Hanson and Mr. Welch are not independent directors.
(4)Amounts reported in this column reflect the dollar value of distributions paid in connection with the stock awards granted to our independent directors or non-employee directors.
(4) Messrs. Hanson, Prosky and Streiff are not independent directors.
2015(5) Messrs. Greene, Robinson and Sanders served as independent directors who retired effective June 14, 2023. As such, amounts presented reflect compensation earned through their date of retirement.
(6) Mr. O’Quinn and Ms. Richardson were appointed to our board effective January 10, 2023.
AHR Incentive Plan
For a discussion of our incentive plan, See Note 12,13, Equity — 2015 Incentive Plan,Equity Compensation Plans, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Amendment and Termination of the 2015 Incentive Plan
Unless otherwise provided in an award certificate, upon the death or disability of a participant, or upon a change in control, all of such participant’s outstanding awards pursuant to our incentive plan will become fully vested. Our incentive plan will automatically expire on the tenth anniversary of the date on which it was adopted, unless extended or earlier terminated by our board. Our board may terminate our incentive plan at any time, but such termination will have no adverse impact on any award that is outstanding at the time of such termination. Our board may amend our incentive plan at any time, but any amendment would be subject to stockholder approval if, in the reasonable judgment of our board, stockholder approval would be required by any law, regulation or rule applicable to the plan. No termination or amendment of our incentive plan may, without the written consent of the participant, reduce or diminish the value of an outstanding award determined as if the award had been exercised, vested, cashed in or otherwise settled on the date of such amendment or termination. Our board may amend or terminate outstanding awards, but those amendments may require consent of the participant and, unless approved by our stockholders or otherwise permitted by the antidilution provisions of the plan, the exercise price of an outstanding option may not be reduced, directly or indirectly, and the original term of an option may not be extended.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Principal Stockholders
The following table shows, as of March 12, 2021,1, 2024, the number of shares of our common stock and OP units beneficially owned by (1) any person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5.0% of any class of the outstanding shares of our common stock; (2) our directors; (3) our named executive officers; and (4) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. The percentagepercentages of common stock beneficially owned is based on 81,697,347include an aggregate of 131,651,977 shares of our common stock, Class T common stock and Class I common stock outstanding as of March 12, 2021.1, 2024 and excludes an aggregate of 3,501,976 OP units outstanding and held by third parties as of March 1, 2024. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes securities over which a person has voting or investment power and securities that a person has the right to acquire within 60 days. The address for each of the beneficial owners named in the following table is 18191 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 300, Irvine, California 92612.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name of Beneficial Owner(1) | | Number of Shares
of Class T
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned | | Percentage of
All Class T
Common
Stock | | Number of Shares
of Class I
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned | | Percentage of
All Class I
Common
Stock |
| Jeffrey T. Hanson | | 67,081 | | (2) | | * | | 63,155 | | | 1.12 | % |
| Brian S. Peay | | — | | | | — | % | | 3,230 | | | * |
| Richard S. Welch | | — | | | | — | % | | — | | | — | % |
| Brian J. Flornes | | 35,000 | | | | * | | — | | | — | % |
| Dianne Hurley | | 39,070 | | | | * | | — | | | — | % |
| Wilbur H. Smith III | | 40,521 | | | | * | | — | | | — | % |
| All directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons) | | 280,396 | | (2) | | * | | 254,495 | | | 4.50 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name of Beneficial Owner (1) | | Number of
Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned | | Number of
Shares of Class T
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned | | Number of
Shares of Class I
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned | | Number of OP
Units
Beneficially
Owned | | | Percentage of
All Classes of
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned |
Millennium Management LLC (2) 399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 | | 3,410,636 | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | 5.3 | % |
Wellington Management Company LLP (3) 280 Congress Street Boston, MA 02210 | | 7,634,745 | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | 11.9 | % |
| Danny Prosky (4) (13) | | 305,555 | | 59,304 | | 80,986 | | 1,268,643 | (5) | | * |
| Brian S. Peay (6) | | 148,148 | | 35,790 | | 808 | | — | | | * |
| Gabriel M. Willhite (7) | | 125,926 | | 31,252 | | — | | — | | | * |
| Stefan K.L. Oh (8) | | 74,074 | | 26,207 | | 5,997 | | — | | | * |
| Mark E. Foster (9) | | 55,556 | | 5,279 | | | | — | | | * |
| Jeffrey T. Hanson (10) | | 7,407 | | 31,873 | | 82,036 | | 1,268,643 | (5) | | * |
| Mathieu B. Streiff (10) (13) | | 90,740 | | 30,264 | | 62,124 | | 1,268,643 | (5) | | * |
| Scott A. Estes (11) | | 7,407 | | 4,836 | | — | | — | | | * |
| Brian J. Flornes (12) | | 7,407 | | 16,367 | | — | | — | | | * |
| Dianne Hurley (12) | | 7,407 | | 17,385 | | — | | — | | | * |
| Marvin R. O’Quinn (11) | | 7,407 | | 4,003 | | — | | — | | | * |
| Valerie Richardson (11) | | 7,407 | | 4,003 | | — | | — | | | * |
| Wilbur H. Smith III (12) | | 7,407 | | 18,360 | | — | | — | | | * |
All directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons) | | 851,848 | | 284,923 | | 231,951 | | 1,268,643 | | | 1.0 | % |
_________________
* Represents less than 1.0% of our outstanding common stock.
(1) Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with SEC rules and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities and shares of our common stock deemed outstanding includes (a) 76,041,549 shares of our Class T common stock or 5,655,798 shares of our Class I common stock outstanding, as applicable, as of March 12, 2021, and (b) shares of our common stock issuable pursuant to options, warrants or similar rights held by the respective person or group that may be exercised within 60 days following March 12, 2021. Beneficial ownership is determined1, 2024. To our knowledge, except as otherwise indicated by footnote (3), and subject to community property laws where applicable, the persons named in accordance with the rules of the SEC that deem shares of stock to be beneficially owned by any person or group who has or sharestable above have sole voting and investment power with respect to suchall shares of stock.common stock shown as beneficially owned by them.
(2)Includes 20,833 Beneficial share ownership information is given as of February 23, 2024 and was obtained from a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on March 4, 2024 by Millennium Management LLC, Millennium Group Management LLC, and Israel A. Englander. According to the Schedule 13G, each of Millennium Management LLC, Millennium Group Management LLC, and Israel A. Englander has shared voting power and shared dispositive power over 3,410,636 shares of our common stock.
(3) Beneficial share ownership information is given as of February 29, 2024 and was obtained from a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on March 7, 2024 by Wellington Management Group, LLP, Wellington Group Holdings LLP, Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP and Wellington Management Company LLP. According to the Schedule 13G, each of Wellington Management Group LLP, Wellington Group Holdings LLP, and Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP has shared voting power over 5,714,143 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power over 7,634,745 shares of our common stock, and Wellington Management Company LLP has shared voting power over 5,300,708 shares of our common stock and shared dispositive power over 6,540,003 shares of our common stock.
(4) Includes 13,559 shares of unvested restricted Class T common stock ownedand 222,222 unvested Listing Equity Awards. Excludes (a) 31,848 shares of Class T common stock underlying unvested time-based RSUs and (b) 58,961 shares of Class T common stock underlying unvested performance-based RSUs (such number of shares assumes that we issue shares of our common stock underlying such unvested performance-based awards at maximum levels for performance and market conditions that have not yet been achieved; to the extent that performance or market conditions do not meet maximum levels, the actual number of shares of our common stock issued under our incentive plan would be less than the amount reflected above).
(5) Represents OP units held by AHI Group Holdings, which may be redeemed for shares of our advisor, which is 75.0% ownedcommon stock on a one-for-one basis. Voting and managedinvestment determinations with respect to the securities held by wholly owned subsidiariesthe AHI Group Holdings are made by Danny Prosky, Jeffrey T. Hanson and Mathieu B. Streiff. Accordingly, each of American Healthcare Investors. Messrs. Hanson, Prosky and Streiff are managing directors of American Healthcare Investors and as such,the individuals named herein may be deemed to be the beneficial owners of such common stock. Each of Messrs. Hanson, Prosky and Streiff disclaimsshare beneficial ownership of the reported securities exceptheld of record by the AHI Group Holdings. Each individual disclaims voting and dispositive power over the OP units held by the other individuals, and the approximate five OP units held by NCT-107, LLC.
(6) Includes 22,372 shares of unvested restricted Class T common stock and 148,148 unvested Listing Equity Awards. Excludes (a) 13,536 shares of Class T common stock underlying unvested time-based RSUs and (b) 23,702 shares of Class T common stock underlying unvested performance-based RSUs (such number of shares assumes that we issue shares of our common stock underlying such unvested performance-based awards at maximum levels for performance and market conditions that have not yet been achieved; to the extent that performance or market conditions do not meet maximum levels, the actual number of his pecuniary interest therein. Our advisor also owns 208shares of our common stock issued under our incentive plan would be less than the amount reflected above).
(7) Includes 21,159 shares of unvested restricted Class T partnership unitscommon stock and 125,926 unvested Listing Equity Awards. Excludes (a) 13,536 shares of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV Holdings, LP,Class T common stock underlying unvested time-based RSUs and (b) 18,618 shares of Class T common stock underlying unvested performance-based RSUs (such number of shares assumes that we issue shares of our operating partnership.common stock underlying such unvested performance-based awards at maximum levels for performance and market conditions that have not yet been achieved; to the extent that performance or market conditions do not meet maximum levels, the actual number of shares of our common stock issued under our incentive plan would be less than the amount reflected above).
(8) Includes 19,491 shares of unvested restricted Class T common stock and 74,074 unvested Listing Equity Awards. Excludes (a) 6,370 shares of Class T common stock underlying unvested time-based RSUs and (b) 10,776 shares of Class T common stock underlying unvested performance-based RSUs (such number of shares assumes that we issue shares of our common stock underlying such unvested performance-based awards at maximum levels for performance and market conditions that have not yet been achieved; to the extent that performance or market conditions do not meet maximum levels, the actual number of shares of our common stock issued under our incentive plan would be less than the amount reflected above).
(9) Includes 1,052 shares of unvested restricted Class T common stock and 55,556 unvested Listing Equity Awards. Excludes (a) 5,972 shares of Class T common stock underlying unvested time-based RSUs and (b) 8,075 shares of Class T common stock underlying unvested performance-based RSUs (such number of shares assumes that we issue shares of our common stock underlying such unvested performance-based awards at maximum levels for performance and market conditions that have not yet been achieved; to the extent that performance or market conditions do not meet maximum levels, the actual number of shares of our common stock issued under our incentive plan would be less than the amount reflected above).
(10) Includes 8,788 shares of unvested restricted Class T common stock and 7,407 unvested Listing Equity Awards.
(11) Includes 3,025 shares of unvested restricted Class T common stock and 7,407 unvested Listing Equity Awards.
(12) Includes 3,400 shares of unvested restricted Class T common stock and 7,407 unvested Listing Equity Awards.
(13) Includes 83,333 shares of our common stock purchased in the 2024 Offering.
None of the above shares have been pledged as security.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
See Part II, Item 5, Market for Registrant’s CommonWe adopted the 2015 Incentive Plan, pursuant to which our board or a committee of our independent directors may make grants of options, restricted shares of common stock, stock purchase rights, stock appreciation rights or other awards to our independent directors, employees and consultants. The maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be issued pursuant to the 2015 Incentive Plan is 4,000,000. The following table provides information regarding the 2015 Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Plan Category | | Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights | | Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights | | Number of Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future Issuance |
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | | 298,832 | | (1) | — | | | 3,405,720 |
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | | — | | — | | | — | |
| Total | | 298,832 | | | | | 3,405,720 | |
________
(1) Reflects performance-based and time-based RSUs representing the right to receive shares of our Class T common stock upon vesting. The number set forth in the table above reflects the maximum number of shares of our Class T common stock potentially issuable upon vesting. These performance-based and time-based RSUs do not have voting rights. The performance-based RSUs will cliff vest in the first quarter of 2025 and 2026 (subject to continuous employment or provision of services through that vesting date) with the amount vesting depending on meeting certain key performance criteria as further described in this proxy statement and in the 2015 Incentive Plan. The time-based RSUs will vest 33.33% annually over three years (subject to continuous employment from the vesting commencement date through each vesting date). For details regarding our grants under the incentive plan of time-based restricted Class T and Class I common stock to our executive officers, key employees and independent directors, see Note 13, Equity Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities — Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans and Note 12, Equity — 2015AHR Incentive Plan, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a discussion of our incentive plan.Plan.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Relationships Among Our AffiliatesRegistration Rights Agreement
AsUpon consummation of December 31, 2020, somethe AHI Acquisition, GAHR III and the Surviving Partnership entered into a registration rights agreement, or the Registration Rights Agreement, with Griffin-American Strategic Holdings, LLC, or HoldCo, pursuant to which, subject to certain limitations therein, as promptly as practicable following the later of the expiration of (i) the period commencing on the closing of the AHI Acquisition and ending upon the earliest to occur of (a) the second anniversary date of the issuance of the Surviving Partnership OP units issued in connection with the AHI Acquisition, (b) a change of control of Merger Sub, and (c) the listing of shares of our executive officerscommon stock on a national securities exchange, or the Lock-Up Period; and (ii) the date on which we are eligible to file a registration statement (but in any event no later than 180 days after such date), we, as the indirect parent company of the Surviving Partnership, are required to file a shelf registration statement with the SEC under the Securities Act covering the resale of the shares of our non-independent directors areClass I common stock issued or issuable in redemption of the Surviving Partnership OP units that the Surviving Partnership issued as consideration in the AHI Acquisition. The Registration Rights Agreement also executive officers and/grants HoldCo (or any successor holder of such shares) demand rights to request additional registration statement filings as well as “piggyback” registration rights, in each case on or holdersafter the expiration of indirect interests in our advisor.the Lock-Up Period.
FeesIn connection with the Merger, we assumed from GAHR III the Registration Rights Agreement and Expenses PaidGAHR III’s obligations thereunder in their entirety. In connection with the 2024 Offering, the Holders (as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement) have agreed that, without prior written consent of the representatives on behalf of the underwriters of the 2024 Offering, during the period ending 180 days after the date of listing of our common stock for trading on a national securities exchange, they will not, and will not publicly disclose an intention to, Affiliatesdirectly or indirectly, among others, subject to certain exceptions, exercise their registration rights under the Registration Rights Agreement.
For a discussion of fees and expenses paid to affiliates, See Note 13, Related Party Transactions to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Certain Conflict Resolution RestrictionsPolicy and Procedures
In order to reduce or eliminate certain potential conflicts of interest, our charter and the Advisory Agreement contain restrictions and conflict resolution procedures relating to: (1)Related party transactions we enter into with our advisor, our co-sponsors, our directors or their respective affiliates; (2) certain other future offerings; and (3) allocation of properties among affiliated entities. Each of the restrictions and procedures that applies toare transactions with our advisor and its affiliates will also apply to any transaction with any entity or real estate program advised, managed or controlled by Griffin Capital and American Healthcare Investors and their affiliates. These restrictions and procedures include, among others, the following:
•Except as otherwise described in our prospectus for our initial offering, we will not accept goods or services from our co-sponsors, our advisor and directors or their respective affiliates unless a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transactions, approve such transactions as fair and reasonable to us and on terms and conditions not less favorable to us than those available from unaffiliated third parties.
•We will not purchase or lease any asset (including any property) in which one of our co-sponsors, our advisor, any of our directors or any of their respective affiliates has an interest without a determination by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in such transaction, that such transaction is fair and reasonable to us and at a price to us no greater than the cost of the property to such co-sponsor, our advisor, such director or directors or any such affiliate, unless there is substantial justification for any amount that exceeds such cost and such excess amount is determined to be reasonable. In no event will we acquire any such asset at an amount in excess of its appraised value. We will not sell or lease assets to one of our co-sponsors, our advisor, any of our directors or any of their respective affiliates unless a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction, determine the transaction is fair and reasonable to us, which determination will be supported by an appraisal obtained from a qualified, independent appraiser selected by a majority of our independent directors.
•We will not make any loans to one of our co-sponsors, our advisor, any of our directors or any of their respective affiliates except mortgage loans in which an appraisal is obtained from an independent appraiser and loans, if any, to a wholly owned subsidiary. In addition, any loans made to us by one of our co-sponsors, our advisor, our directors or any of their respective affiliates must be approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction, as fair, competitive and commercially reasonable, and no less favorable to us than comparable loans between unaffiliated parties.
•Our advisor and its affiliates will be entitled to reimbursement, at cost, for actual expenses incurred by them on our behalf or on behalf of joint ventures in which we are a joint venture partner,participant where the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and a member of our board, an executive officer, or a holder of more than 5.0% of our voting securities (or an immediate family member of any of the foregoing) has a direct or indirect material interest. We have adopted a written statement of policy regarding transactions with related parties. Our related party transaction policy requires all “related party transactions” to be promptly disclosed to our General Counsel. All related party transactions must be approved or ratified by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. As a general rule, directors interested in a related party transaction will recuse themselves from any discussion or vote on a related party transaction in which they have an interest. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider all relevant facts and circumstances when deliberating such transactions, including whether such transactions are in our best interests.
The following is a summary of certain related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements which are described under Part II, Item 11, Executive Compensation.
Indemnification Agreements
We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. These agreements require us to indemnify these individuals to the maximum extent permitted under Maryland law and our charter against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to us, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified upon our receipt of certain affirmations and undertakings. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors or executive officers, we have been informed that in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy and is therefore unenforceable.
There is currently no pending material litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers, or employees for which indemnification is sought.
Listing Equity Awards
Upon the closing of the 2024 Offering on February 9, 2024, we granted 972,222 shares of restricted common stock to our directors, executive officers and employees under our incentive plan in connection with the recent listing of our common stock on the NYSE, or Listing Equity Awards. The Listing Equity Awards vest ratably over four years and are subject to continuous service through the limitation that our advisor and its affiliates are not entitled to reimbursement of operating expenses, generally, to the extent that they exceed the greater of 2.0%vesting dates.
Lock-Up Agreements
On January 24, 2024, we entered into lock-up agreements with each of our average invested assets or 25.0%directors and executive officers, pursuant to which each such individual agreed not to transfer shares of our net income, unlessof our independentcommon stock held or subsequently acquired by such individual for the applicable lock-up period. For each of such directors determineand officers, the applicable period began as of February 7, 2024 and ends on August 5, 2024.
Related Party Transaction Policy
We have adopted a written statement of policy regarding transactions with related parties, which we refer to as our “related person policy.” Our related person policy requires that such excess expensesa “related person” (as defined as in paragraph (a) of Item 404 of Regulation S-K) must promptly disclose to us any “related person transaction” (defined as any transaction that is anticipated would be reportable by us under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K in which we were or are justified basedto be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest) and all material facts with respect thereto. We will then promptly communicate that information to our board. No related person transaction will be executed without the approval or ratification of our board or a duly authorized committee of our board. It is our policy that directors interested in a related person transaction will recuse themselves from any vote on unusual and nonrecurring factorsa related person transaction in which they deem sufficient.have an interest.
Item 14. Principal AccountingAccountant Fees and Services.
Deloitte & Touche has served as our independent registered public accounting firm and audited our consolidated financial statements since January 27, 2015.
The following table lists the fees for services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm for 20202023 and 2019:2022:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Services | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Audit fees(1) | | $ | 819,000 | | | $ | 851,000 | |
| Audit-related fees(2) | | 23,000 | | | 2,000 | |
| Tax fees(3) | | 262,000 | | | 235,000 | |
| All other fees | | — | | | — | |
| Total | $ | 1,104,000 | | | $ | 1,088,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Services | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Audit fees (1) | | $ | 2,237,000 | | | $ | 2,461,000 | |
| Audit-related fees (2) | | 64,000 | | 211,000 |
| Tax fees (3) | | 258,000 | | 298,000 |
| All other fees | | — | | — |
| Total | | $ | 2,559,000 | | | $ | 2,970,000 | |
________
(1)Audit fees consist of fees related to the 20202023 and 20192022 audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and reviews of our quarterly consolidated financial statements. Audit fees also relate to statutory and regulatory audits, consents, comfort letters and other services related to filings with the SEC in the year the services were rendered.
(2)Audit-related fees primarily relate to, among other things, compliance audits and financial accounting and reporting consultations assurance and related services in the year the services were rendered.
(3)Tax services consist of tax compliance and tax planning and advice in the year the services were rendered.
The audit committeeAudit Committee pre-approves all auditingaudit services and permitted non-audit services (including the fees and terms thereof) to be performed for us by our independent registered public accounting firm, subject to the de minimis exceptions for non-audit services described in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations of the SEC. All services rendered by Deloitte & Touche for the years ended December 31, 20202023 and 20192022 were pre-approved in accordance with the policies and procedures described above.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
(a)(1) Financial Statements:
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(a)(2)Financial Statement Schedule:
The following financial statement schedule for the year ended December 31, 20202023 is submitted herewith:
All schedules other than the one listed above have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in our consolidated financial statements or related notes.
(a)(3)Exhibits:
(b) Exhibits:
See Item 15(a)(3) above.
(c) Financial Statement Schedule:
See Item 15(a)(2) above.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT, IV, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT, IV, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020,2023, and the related notes and the schedule listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”"financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020,2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets — Determination of Impairment Indicatorsrelating to real estate investments, net — Refer to NoteNotes 2 and 3 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company periodically evaluates long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in real estate that are carried at historical cost less accumulated depreciation, for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company considers the following indicators, among others, important that they believe could trigger an impairment review:in its evaluation of impairment:
•Significant negative industry or economic trends;
•A significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results; and
•A significant change in the extent or manner in which the asset is used or significant physical change in the asset.
If indicators of impairment of long-lived assets are present, the Company evaluates the carrying value of the related real estate investment in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying operations. In performing this evaluation, the Company considers market conditions and the Company’s current intentions with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. The Company adjusts the net book value of leased properties it leases to others and other long-lived assets to fair value if the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows, including sales proceeds, is less than carrying value. The Company recognizes an impairment loss at the time any such determination is made.
The total real estate investments balance as of December 31, 2020 was $921,580,000, and impairment losses recorded during 2020 were $3,642,000.
We identified the determinationimpairment of impairment indicators for real estate investments as a critical audit matter because of the significant estimates and assumptions management makes when determining whether events or changes in circumstances have occurred indicating thatto evaluate the carrying amountsrecoverability of real estate assets may not be recoverable.investments. This required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort when performing audit procedures to evaluate whether management appropriately identified impairment indicators such as changes in historicalthe reasonableness of significant estimates and assumptions related to future net operating income, occupancyrevenues and overall market conditions.terminal capitalization rates within management’s undiscounted future cash flow analysis.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the evaluation of real estate investments, net for possible indicators of impairment included the following, among others:
•We evaluated management’sthe design and implementation of controls over impairment analysis by:
–Evaluating management's process forof real estate investments, including those over identifying impairment indicators, and whether management appropriately considered the examplesdetermination of impairment indicators provided within the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 360, Property, Plant, & Equipment.forecasted undiscounted cash flows including terminal capitalization rates for real estate investments.
–•Obtaining independent market data to determine if there were additionalFor real estate investments where indicators of impairment not identifiedwere determined to be present, we tested management’s undiscounted cash flow models by management.
–Testing(1) evaluating the real estate investments for possible indicatorssource information used by management, (2) testing the mathematical accuracy of impairment, including searching for adverse asset-specific conditions, such as occupancythe undiscounted cash flow models, and net operating income performance by each investment.(3) evaluating management’s significant assumptions using independently obtained market data.
•Developed an independent expectationWith the assistance of impairment indicatorsour internal fair value specialists, we evaluated the reasonableness of the significant estimates and compared such expectation to management’s analysis.assumptions including future revenues and terminal capitalization rates.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Costa Mesa, California
March 26, 2021
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 20202023 and 20192022
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| | | December 31, | | December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2023 | | 2022 |
| ASSETS | ASSETS | ASSETS |
| Real estate investments, net | Real estate investments, net | $ | 921,580,000 | | | $ | 895,060,000 | |
| Debt security investment, net | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | Cash and cash equivalents | 17,411,000 | | | 15,290,000 | |
| Restricted cash | |
| Accounts and other receivables, net | Accounts and other receivables, net | 2,635,000 | | | 4,608,000 | |
| Restricted cash | 714,000 | | | 556,000 | |
| Real estate deposits | 0 | | | 1,915,000 | |
| | Identified intangible assets, net | Identified intangible assets, net | 64,101,000 | | | 74,023,000 | |
| Identified intangible assets, net | |
| Identified intangible assets, net | |
| Goodwill | |
| Operating lease right-of-use assets, net | Operating lease right-of-use assets, net | 14,133,000 | | | 14,255,000 | |
| Other assets, net | Other assets, net | 72,199,000 | | | 62,620,000 | |
| Total assets | Total assets | $ | 1,092,773,000 | | | $ | 1,068,327,000 | |
| LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS AND EQUITY | | LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS AND EQUITY | |
| LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS AND EQUITY | |
| Liabilities: | Liabilities: | |
| Mortgage loans payable, net(1) | Mortgage loans payable, net(1) | $ | 17,827,000 | | | $ | 26,070,000 | |
| Line of credit and term loans(1) | 476,900,000 | | | 396,800,000 | |
| Mortgage loans payable, net(1) | |
| Mortgage loans payable, net(1) | |
| Lines of credit and term loan, net(1) | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(1) | Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(1) | 23,057,000 | | | 32,033,000 | |
| Accounts payable due to affiliates(1) | 1,046,000 | | | 1,016,000 | |
| | Identified intangible liabilities, net | Identified intangible liabilities, net | 1,295,000 | | | 1,601,000 | |
| Identified intangible liabilities, net | |
| Identified intangible liabilities, net | |
| Financing obligations(1) | |
| Operating lease liabilities(1) | Operating lease liabilities(1) | 9,904,000 | | | 9,858,000 | |
| Security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities(1) | Security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities(1) | 10,387,000 | | | 9,408,000 | |
| Total liabilities | Total liabilities | 540,416,000 | | | 476,786,000 | |
| | Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) | 0 | | 0 |
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) | |
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) | |
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) | | | | |
| | Redeemable noncontrolling interests (Note 11) | 2,618,000 | | | 1,462,000 | |
| Redeemable noncontrolling interests (Note 12) | |
| Redeemable noncontrolling interests (Note 12) | |
| Redeemable noncontrolling interests (Note 12) | |
| | Equity: | Equity: | |
| Equity: | |
| Equity: | |
| Stockholders’ equity: | Stockholders’ equity: | |
| Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 0ne issued and outstanding | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Class T common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 900,000,000 shares authorized; 75,690,838 and 74,244,823 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively | 756,000 | | | 742,000 | |
| Class I common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 5,648,499 and 5,655,051 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively | 57,000 | | | 56,000 | |
| Stockholders’ equity: | |
| Stockholders’ equity: | |
| Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; 200,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding | |
| Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; 200,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding | |
| Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; 200,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding | |
| Class T common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 19,552,856 and 19,535,095 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively | |
| Class I common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 800,000,000 shares authorized; 46,673,320 and 46,675,367 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively | |
| Additional paid-in capital | Additional paid-in capital | 733,192,000 | | | 719,894,000 | |
| Accumulated deficit | Accumulated deficit | (185,047,000) | | | (130,613,000) | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | |
| Total stockholders’ equity | Total stockholders’ equity | 548,958,000 | | | 590,079,000 | |
| Noncontrolling interest (Note 12) | 781,000 | | | 0 | |
| Noncontrolling interests (Note 13) | |
| Total equity | Total equity | 549,739,000 | | | 590,079,000 | |
| Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and equity | Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and equity | $ | 1,092,773,000 | | | $ | 1,068,327,000 | |
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS — (Continued)
As of December 31, 20202023 and 20192022
___________
(1) Such liabilities of Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT, IV, Inc. as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 represented liabilities of Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT IV Holdings, LP or its consolidated subsidiaries. Griffin-Americansubsidiaries as of December 31, 2023 and 2022. American Healthcare REIT IV Holdings, LP is a variable interest entity, or VIE, and a consolidated subsidiary of Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT, IV, Inc. The creditors of Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT IV Holdings, LP or its consolidated subsidiaries do not have recourse against Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT, IV, Inc., except for the 20182022 Credit Facility, as defined in Note 7,9, held by Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT IV Holdings, LP in the amount of $476,900,000$914,900 and $396,800,000$965,900, as of December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, respectively, which iswas guaranteed by Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT, IV, Inc.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Revenues and grant income: | | | | | |
| Resident fees and services | $ | 1,668,742 | | | $ | 1,412,156 | | | $ | 1,123,935 | |
| Real estate revenue | 190,401 | | | 205,344 | | | 141,368 | |
| Grant income | 7,475 | | | 25,675 | | | 16,951 | |
| Total revenues and grant income | 1,866,618 | | | 1,643,175 | | | 1,282,254 | |
| Expenses: | | | | | |
| Property operating expenses | 1,502,310 | | | 1,281,526 | | | 1,030,193 | |
| Rental expenses | 57,475 | | | 59,684 | | | 38,725 | |
| General and administrative | 47,510 | | | 43,418 | | | 43,199 | |
| Business acquisition expenses | 5,795 | | | 4,388 | | | 13,022 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 182,604 | | | 167,957 | | | 133,191 | |
| Total expenses | 1,795,694 | | | 1,556,973 | | | 1,258,330 | |
| Other income (expense): | | | | | |
| Interest expense: | | | | | |
| Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs, debt discount/premium and loss on debt extinguishments) | (163,191) | | | (105,956) | | | (80,937) | |
| (Loss) gain in fair value of derivative financial instruments | (926) | | | 500 | | | 8,200 | |
| Gain (loss) on dispositions of real estate investments, net | 32,472 | | | 5,481 | | | (100) | |
| Impairment of real estate investments | (13,899) | | | (54,579) | | | (3,335) | |
| Impairment of intangible assets and goodwill | (10,520) | | | (23,277) | | | — | |
| (Loss) income from unconsolidated entities | (1,718) | | | 1,407 | | | (1,355) | |
| Gain on re-measurement of previously held equity interests | 726 | | | 19,567 | | | — | |
| Foreign currency gain (loss) | 2,307 | | | (5,206) | | | (564) | |
| Other income | 7,601 | | | 3,064 | | | 1,854 | |
| Total net other expense | (147,148) | | | (158,999) | | | (76,237) | |
| Loss before income taxes | (76,224) | | | (72,797) | | | (52,313) | |
| Income tax expense | (663) | | | (586) | | | (956) | |
| Net loss | (76,887) | | | (73,383) | | | (53,269) | |
| Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 5,418 | | | (7,919) | | | 5,475 | |
| Net loss attributable to controlling interest | $ | (71,469) | | | $ | (81,302) | | | $ | (47,794) | |
| Net loss per Class T and Class I common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted | $ | (1.08) | | | $ | (1.24) | | | $ | (0.95) | |
| Weighted average number of Class T and Class I common shares outstanding — basic and diluted | 66,047,114 | | | 65,807,868 | | | 50,081,140 | |
| | | | | |
| Net loss | $ | (76,887) | | | $ | (73,383) | | | $ | (53,269) | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | 265 | | | (724) | | | (65) | |
| Total other comprehensive income (loss) | 265 | | | (724) | | | (65) | |
| Comprehensive loss | (76,622) | | | (74,107) | | | (53,334) | |
| Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 5,418 | | | (7,919) | | | 5,582 | |
| Comprehensive loss attributable to controlling interest | $ | (71,204) | | | $ | (82,026) | | | $ | (47,752) | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Revenues and grant income: | | | | | |
| Real estate revenue | $ | 86,321,000 | | | $ | 74,610,000 | | | $ | 47,599,000 | |
| Resident fees and services | 67,793,000 | | | 46,160,000 | | | 36,857,000 | |
| Grant income | 1,005,000 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Total revenues and grant income | 155,119,000 | | | 120,770,000 | | | 84,456,000 | |
| Expenses: | | | | | |
| Rental expenses | 23,450,000 | | | 19,226,000 | | | 11,499,000 | |
| Property operating expenses | 60,224,000 | | | 37,434,000 | | | 30,023,000 | |
| General and administrative | 16,691,000 | | | 15,235,000 | | | 9,172,000 | |
| Acquisition related expenses | (160,000) | | | 1,974,000 | | | 2,795,000 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 50,304,000 | | | 45,626,000 | | | 32,658,000 | |
| Total expenses | 150,509,000 | | | 119,495,000 | | | 86,147,000 | |
| Other income (expense): | | | | | |
| Interest expense: | | | | | |
| Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount/premium) | (19,955,000) | | | (16,191,000) | | | (6,788,000) | |
| Loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments | (870,000) | | | (4,385,000) | | | 0 | |
| Impairment of real estate investments | (3,642,000) | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Income (loss) from unconsolidated entity | 629,000 | | | 267,000 | | | (110,000) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Other income | 286,000 | | | 175,000 | | | 11,000 | |
| Loss before income taxes | (18,942,000) | | | (18,859,000) | | | (8,578,000) | |
| Income tax benefit (expense) | 0 | | | 8,000 | | | (8,000) | |
| Net loss | (18,942,000) | | | (18,851,000) | | | (8,586,000) | |
| Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | 885,000 | | | 82,000 | | | 232,000 | |
| Net loss attributable to controlling interest | $ | (18,057,000) | | | $ | (18,769,000) | | | $ | (8,354,000) | |
| Net loss per Class T and Class I common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted | $ | (0.22) | | | $ | (0.24) | | | $ | (0.15) | |
| Weighted average number of Class T and Class I common shares outstanding — basic and diluted | 80,661,645 | | | 78,396,077 | | | 54,847,197 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 20182021
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| | Stockholders’ Equity | | |
| | Class T and Class I Common Stock | | | | | | | | | |
| Number
of Shares | | Amount | | Additional
Paid-In Capital | | Accumulated
Deficit | | | Total
Stockholders’
Equity | | Noncontrolling
Interest | | Total Equity | | |
| BALANCE — December 31, 2017 | 42,207,160 | | | $ | 422,000 | | | $ | 376,284,000 | | | $ | (23,482,000) | | | | $ | 353,224,000 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 353,224,000 | | | |
| Issuance of common stock | 25,537,018 | | | 256,000 | | | 254,996,000 | | | — | | | | 255,252,000 | | | — | | | 255,252,000 | | | |
| Offering costs — common stock | — | | | — | | | (23,760,000) | | | — | | | | (23,760,000) | | | — | | | (23,760,000) | | | |
| Issuance of common stock under the DRIP | 1,838,711 | | | 18,000 | | | 17,594,000 | | | — | | | | 17,612,000 | | | — | | | 17,612,000 | | | |
| Issuance of vested and nonvested restricted common stock | 22,500 | | | — | | | 45,000 | | | — | | | | 45,000 | | | — | | | 45,000 | | | |
| Amortization of nonvested common stock compensation | — | | | — | | | 140,000 | | | — | | | | 140,000 | | | — | | | 140,000 | | | |
| Repurchase of common stock | (350,418) | | | (4,000) | | | (3,308,000) | | | — | | | | (3,312,000) | | | — | | | (3,312,000) | | | |
| Adjustment to value of redeemable noncontrolling interests | — | | | — | | | (232,000) | | | — | | | | (232,000) | | | — | | | (232,000) | | | |
| Distributions declared ($0.60 per share) | — | | | — | | | — | | | (32,943,000) | | | | (32,943,000) | | | — | | | (32,943,000) | | | |
| Net loss | — | | | — | | | — | | | (8,354,000) | | | | (8,354,000) | | | — | | | (8,354,000) | | (1) | |
| BALANCE — December 31, 2018 | 69,254,971 | | | $ | 692,000 | | | $ | 621,759,000 | | | $ | (64,779,000) | | | | $ | 557,672,000 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 557,672,000 | | | |
| Issuance of common stock | 8,884,165 | | | 89,000 | | | 88,626,000 | | | — | | | | 88,715,000 | | | — | | | 88,715,000 | | | |
| Offering costs — common stock | — | | | — | | | (7,432,000) | | | — | | | | (7,432,000) | | | — | | | (7,432,000) | | | |
| Issuance of common stock under the DRIP | 2,666,913 | | | 26,000 | | | 25,507,000 | | | — | | | | 25,533,000 | | | — | | | 25,533,000 | | | |
| Issuance of vested and nonvested restricted common stock | 22,500 | | | — | | | 43,000 | | | — | | | | 43,000 | | | — | | | 43,000 | | | |
| Amortization of nonvested common stock compensation | — | | | — | | | 164,000 | | | — | | | | 164,000 | | | — | | | 164,000 | | | |
| Repurchase of common stock | (928,675) | | | (9,000) | | | (8,600,000) | | | — | | | | (8,609,000) | | | — | | | (8,609,000) | | | |
| Adjustment to value of redeemable noncontrolling interests | — | | | — | | | (173,000) | | | — | | | | (173,000) | | | — | | | (173,000) | | | |
| | Distributions declared ($0.60 per share) | — | | | — | | | — | | | (47,065,000) | | | | (47,065,000) | | | — | | | (47,065,000) | | | |
| Net loss | — | | | — | | | — | | | (18,769,000) | | | | (18,769,000) | | | — | | | (18,769,000) | | (1) | |
| | BALANCE — December 31, 2019 | 79,899,874 | | | $ | 798,000 | | | $ | 719,894,000 | | | $ | (130,613,000) | | | | $ | 590,079,000 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 590,079,000 | | | |
| Number
of
Shares | |
| Number
of
Shares | |
| Number
of
Shares | |
| BALANCE — December 31, 2020 | |
| BALANCE — December 31, 2020 | |
| BALANCE — December 31, 2020 | |
| Offering costs — common stock | Offering costs — common stock | — | | | — | | | 65,000 | | | — | | | | 65,000 | | | — | | | 65,000 | | | |
| Offering costs — common stock | |
| Offering costs — common stock | |
| Issuance of common stock and purchase of noncontrolling interest in connection with the Merger | |
| Issuance of common stock and purchase of noncontrolling interest in connection with the Merger | |
| Issuance of common stock and purchase of noncontrolling interest in connection with the Merger | |
| Issuance of operating partnership units to acquire AHI | |
| Issuance of common stock under the DRIP | |
| Issuance of common stock under the DRIP | |
| Issuance of common stock under the DRIP | Issuance of common stock under the DRIP | 2,081,895 | | | 22,000 | | | 19,840,000 | | | — | | | | 19,862,000 | | | — | | | 19,862,000 | | | |
| Issuance of vested and nonvested restricted common stock | Issuance of vested and nonvested restricted common stock | 22,500 | | | — | | | 43,000 | | | — | | | | 43,000 | | | — | | | 43,000 | | | |
| Issuance of vested and nonvested restricted common stock | |
| Issuance of vested and nonvested restricted common stock | |
| Amortization of nonvested common stock compensation | Amortization of nonvested common stock compensation | — | | | — | | | 172,000 | | | — | | | | 172,000 | | | — | | | 172,000 | | | |
| Amortization of nonvested common stock compensation | |
| Amortization of nonvested common stock compensation | |
| Stock based compensation | |
| Stock based compensation | |
| Stock based compensation | |
| Repurchase of common stock | Repurchase of common stock | (664,932) | | | (7,000) | | | (6,207,000) | | | — | | | | (6,214,000) | | | — | | | (6,214,000) | | | |
| Contribution from noncontrolling interest | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | 1,250,000 | | | 1,250,000 | | | |
| Distributions to noncontrolling interest | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | (77,000) | | | (77,000) | | | |
| Repurchase of common stock | |
| Repurchase of common stock | |
| | Distributions to noncontrolling interests | |
| | Distributions to noncontrolling interests | |
| | Distributions to noncontrolling interests | |
| | Reclassification of noncontrolling interests to mezzanine equity | |
| | Reclassification of noncontrolling interests to mezzanine equity | |
| | Reclassification of noncontrolling interests to mezzanine equity | |
| Adjustment to value of redeemable noncontrolling interests | Adjustment to value of redeemable noncontrolling interests | — | | | — | | | (615,000) | | | — | | | | (615,000) | | | — | | | (615,000) | | | |
| Distributions declared ($0.45 per share) | — | | | — | | | — | | | (36,377,000) | | | | (36,377,000) | | | — | | | (36,377,000) | | | |
| Adjustment to value of redeemable noncontrolling interests | |
| Adjustment to value of redeemable noncontrolling interests | |
| Distributions declared ($0.69 per share) | |
| Distributions declared ($0.69 per share) | |
| Distributions declared ($0.69 per share) | |
| Net loss | Net loss | — | | | — | | | — | | | (18,057,000) | | | | (18,057,000) | | | (392,000) | | | (18,449,000) | | (1) | |
| BALANCE — December 31, 2020 | 81,339,337 | | | $ | 813,000 | | | $ | 733,192,000 | | | $ | (185,047,000) | | | | $ | 548,958,000 | | | $ | 781,000 | | | $ | 549,739,000 | | | |
| Net loss | |
| Net loss | |
| Other comprehensive loss | |
| BALANCE — December 31, 2021 | |
| BALANCE — December 31, 2021 | |
| BALANCE — December 31, 2021 | |
| Offering costs — common stock | |
| Offering costs — common stock | |
| Offering costs — common stock | |
| | Issuance of common stock under the DRIP | |
| | Issuance of common stock under the DRIP | |
| | Issuance of common stock under the DRIP | |
| Issuance of nonvested restricted common stock | |
| Issuance of nonvested restricted common stock | |
| Issuance of nonvested restricted common stock | |
| Amortization of nonvested restricted common stock and stock units | |
| Amortization of nonvested restricted common stock and stock units | |
| Amortization of nonvested restricted common stock and stock units | |
| Stock based compensation | |
| Stock based compensation | |
| Stock based compensation | |
| Repurchase of common stock | |
| Repurchase of common stock | |
| Repurchase of common stock | |
| | Distributions to noncontrolling interests | |
| | Distributions to noncontrolling interests | |
| | Distributions to noncontrolling interests | |
| Adjustment to noncontrolling interest in connection with the Merger | |
| Adjustment to noncontrolling interest in connection with the Merger | |
| Adjustment to noncontrolling interest in connection with the Merger | |
| Reclassification of noncontrolling interests to mezzanine equity | |
| Adjustment to value of redeemable noncontrolling interests | |
| Adjustment to value of redeemable noncontrolling interests | |
| Adjustment to value of redeemable noncontrolling interests | |
| Purchase of redeemable noncontrolling interest | |
| Purchase of redeemable noncontrolling interest | |
| Purchase of redeemable noncontrolling interest | |
| Distributions declared ($1.60 per share) | |
| Distributions declared ($1.60 per share) | |
| Distributions declared ($1.60 per share) | |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY — (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | |
| | Class T and Class I
Common Stock | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Number
of
Shares | | Amount | | Additional
Paid-In Capital | | Accumulated
Deficit | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss | | Total
Stockholders’
Equity | | Noncontrolling
Interests | | Total Equity | |
| Net (loss) income | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (81,302) | | | $ | — | | | $ | (81,302) | | | $ | 8,324 | | | $ | (72,978) | | (3) | |
| Other comprehensive loss | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (724) | | | (724) | | | — | | | (724) | | |
| BALANCE — December 31, 2022 | 66,210,462 | | | $ | 661 | | | $ | 2,540,424 | | | $ | (1,138,304) | | | $ | (2,690) | | | $ | 1,400,091 | | | $ | 167,674 | | | $ | 1,567,765 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Issuance of nonvested restricted common stock | 26,156 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | |
| Vested restricted stock units(4) | 4,120 | | | — | | | (72) | | | — | | | — | | | (72) | | | — | | | (72) | | |
| Amortization of nonvested restricted common stock and stock units | — | | | — | | | 5,385 | | | — | | | — | | | 5,385 | | | — | | | 5,385 | | |
| Stock based compensation | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 83 | | | 83 | | |
| Repurchase of common stock | (14,562) | | | — | | | (469) | | | — | | | — | | | (469) | | | — | | | (469) | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (8,210) | | | (8,210) | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reclassification of noncontrolling interests to mezzanine equity | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (83) | | | (83) | | |
| Adjustment to value of redeemable noncontrolling interests | — | | | — | | | 3,039 | | | — | | | — | | | 3,039 | | | (95) | | | 2,944 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Distributions declared ($1.00 per share) | — | | | — | | | — | | | (66,449) | | | — | | | (66,449) | | | — | | | (66,449) | | |
| Net loss | — | | | — | | | — | | | (71,469) | | | — | | | (71,469) | | | (4,355) | | | (75,824) | | (3) | |
| Other comprehensive income | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 265 | | | 265 | | | — | | | 265 | | |
| BALANCE — December 31, 2023 | 66,226,176 | | | $ | 661 | | | $ | 2,548,307 | | | $ | (1,276,222) | | | $ | (2,425) | | | $ | 1,270,321 | | | $ | 155,014 | | | $ | 1,425,335 | | |
___________
(1) Amount excludesIn connection with the Merger, as defined in Note 1, on October 1, 2021, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV Holdings, LP sold its 6.0% interest in Trilogy REIT Holdings, LLC to GAHR III, as defined in Note 1. See Note 13, Equity — Noncontrolling Interests in Total Equity, for a further discussion.
(2)$493,000, $82,000 and $232,000 forPrior to the Merger, but upon the closing of the AHI Acquisition, as defined in Note 1, GAHR III redeemed all 5,148 shares of its common stock held by GAHR III’s former advisor as well as all 5,208 shares of GAHR IV Class T common stock held by the former advisor of GAHR IV, as defined in Note 1.
(3)For the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018,2021, amounts exclude $(1,063,000), $(405,000) and $(1,144,000), respectively, of net loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests. See Note 11,12, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests, for a further discussion.
The accompanying notesamounts are an integral partshown net of these consolidated financial statements.common stock withheld from issuance to satisfy employee minimum tax withholding requirements in connection with the vesting of restricted stock units. See Note 13, Equity — Equity Compensation Plans, for a further discussion.
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 20182021
(In thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
| Net loss | $ | (18,942,000) | | | $ | (18,851,000) | | | $ | (8,586,000) | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 50,304,000 | | | 45,626,000 | | | 32,658,000 | |
| Other amortization | 2,788,000 | | | 3,251,000 | | | 1,015,000 | |
| Deferred rent | (4,376,000) | | | (3,076,000) | | | (3,029,000) | |
| Stock based compensation | 215,000 | | | 207,000 | | | 185,000 | |
| (Income) loss from unconsolidated entity | (629,000) | | | (267,000) | | | 110,000 | |
| Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated entity | 629,000 | | | 157,000 | | | 0 | |
| Bad debt expense | 510,000 | | | 1,482,000 | | | 1,274,000 | |
| Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments | 870,000 | | | 4,385,000 | | | 0 | |
| Impairment of real estate investments | 3,642,000 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
| Accounts and other receivables | 1,464,000 | | | 3,489,000 | | | (7,413,000) | |
| Other assets | (1,380,000) | | | (121,000) | | | (328,000) | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 1,183,000 | | | 2,999,000 | | | 224,000 | |
| Accounts payable due to affiliates | 75,000 | | | 224,000 | | | 338,000 | |
| Security deposits, prepaid rent, operating lease and other liabilities | (858,000) | | | 35,000 | | | (1,025,000) | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 35,495,000 | | | 39,540,000 | | | 15,423,000 | |
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
| Acquisitions of real estate investments | (68,509,000) | | | (195,249,000) | | | (355,070,000) | |
| Capital expenditures | (8,308,000) | | | (6,497,000) | | | (4,257,000) | |
| Investment in unconsolidated entity | 0 | | | (600,000) | | | (48,000,000) | |
| Distributions in excess of earnings from unconsolidated entity | 361,000 | | | 1,294,000 | | | 290,000 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Real estate deposits | 0 | | | 1,385,000 | | | (3,400,000) | |
| Pre-acquisition expenses | 0 | | | (267,000) | | | (1,117,000) | |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (76,456,000) | | | (199,934,000) | | | (411,554,000) | |
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
| Payments on mortgage loans payable | (8,332,000) | | | (650,000) | | | (449,000) | |
| Borrowings under the line of credit and term loans | 143,200,000 | | | 257,900,000 | | | 771,200,000 | |
| Payments on the line of credit and term loans | (63,100,000) | | | (136,100,000) | | | (580,300,000) | |
| Deferred financing costs | (43,000) | | | (1,192,000) | | | (4,092,000) | |
| Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 0 | | | 90,438,000 | | | 254,017,000 | |
| Payment of offering costs | (6,444,000) | | | (19,136,000) | | | (19,817,000) | |
| Distributions paid | (17,837,000) | | | (20,905,000) | | | (13,989,000) | |
| Repurchase of common stock | (6,214,000) | | | (8,609,000) | | | (3,312,000) | |
| Contribution from noncontrolling interest | 1,250,000 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Distributions to noncontrolling interest | (77,000) | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Contributions from redeemable noncontrolling interests | 1,138,000 | | | 151,000 | | | 369,000 | |
| Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests | (104,000) | | | (151,000) | | | 0 | |
| Security deposits | (197,000) | | | (96,000) | | | (9,000) | |
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 43,240,000 | | | 161,650,000 | | | 403,618,000 | |
| NET CHANGE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH | 2,279,000 | | | 1,256,000 | | | 7,487,000 | |
| CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH — Beginning of period | 15,846,000 | | | 14,590,000 | | | 7,103,000 | |
| CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH — End of period | $ | 18,125,000 | | | $ | 15,846,000 | | | $ | 14,590,000 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
| Net loss | $ | (76,887) | | | $ | (73,383) | | | $ | (53,269) | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 182,604 | | | 167,957 | | | 133,191 | |
| Other amortization | 54,692 | | | 32,643 | | | 24,189 | |
| Deferred rent | (3,480) | | | (6,520) | | | (2,673) | |
| | | | | |
| Stock based compensation | 5,468 | | | 3,909 | | | 9,658 | |
| (Gain) loss on dispositions of real estate investments, net | (32,472) | | | (5,481) | | | 100 | |
| Impairment of real estate investments | 13,899 | | | 54,579 | | | 3,335 | |
| | | | | |
| Impairment of intangible assets and goodwill | 10,520 | | | 23,277 | | | — | |
| Loss (income) from unconsolidated entities | 1,718 | | | (1,407) | | | 1,355 | |
| Gain on re-measurement of previously held equity interests | (726) | | | (19,567) | | | — | |
| Foreign currency (gain) loss | (2,282) | | | 4,893 | | | 573 | |
| Loss on extinguishments of debt | 345 | | | 5,166 | | | 2,655 | |
| Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments | 926 | | | (500) | | | (8,200) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Other adjustments | — | | | — | | | 466 | |
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
| Accounts and other receivables | (34,724) | | | (4,457) | | | 3,691 | |
| Other assets | (4,166) | | | (8,303) | | | (2,775) | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 15,427 | | | 14,062 | | | (32,571) | |
| Accounts payable due to affiliates | — | | | (184) | | | (7,140) | |
| Operating lease liabilities | (36,609) | | | (24,699) | | | (16,793) | |
| Security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities | 4,282 | | | (14,217) | | | (37,879) | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 98,535 | | | 147,768 | | | 17,913 | |
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
| Proceeds from dispositions of real estate investments | 184,532 | | | 48,297 | | | 4,499 | |
| Developments and capital expenditures | (99,791) | | | (71,520) | | | (79,695) | |
| Acquisitions of real estate investments | (45,382) | | | (73,229) | | | (80,109) | |
| Acquisition of previously held equity interest | (335) | | | (13,714) | | | — | |
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash acquired in connection with the Merger and the AHI Acquisition | — | | | — | | | 17,852 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Investments in unconsolidated entities | (12,592) | | | (4,858) | | | (650) | |
| Issuance of real estate notes receivable | (20,962) | | | (3,000) | | | — | |
| Principal repayments on real estate notes receivable | 6,082 | | | — | | | — | |
| Real estate and other deposits | (2,156) | | | (554) | | | (549) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 9,396 | | | (118,578) | | | (138,652) | |
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
| Borrowings under mortgage loans payable | 160,442 | | | 120,057 | | | 298,515 | |
| Payments on mortgage loans payable | (101,457) | | | (125,454) | | | (34,616) | |
| | | | | |
| Borrowings under the lines of credit and term loans | 401,450 | | | 1,160,400 | | | 51,100 | |
| Payments on the lines of credit and term loans | (459,361) | | | (1,104,400) | | | (157,000) | |
| Borrowings under financing obligations | 16,283 | | | 25,900 | | | — | |
| Payments on financing and other obligations | (34,943) | | | (13,677) | | | (11,685) | |
| Deferred financing costs | (5,311) | | | (7,550) | | | (3,854) | |
| Debt extinguishment costs | (269) | | | (3,243) | | | (127) | |
| Distributions paid to common stockholders | (76,284) | | | (51,122) | | | (22,788) | |
| Repurchase of common stock | (469) | | | (20,699) | | | (382) | |
| | | | | |
| Payments to taxing authorities in connection with common stock directly withheld from employees | (72) | | | — | | | — | |
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests in total equity | (8,628) | | | (13,242) | | | (14,875) | |
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS — (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 20182021
(In thousands)
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | Years Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Contributions from redeemable noncontrolling interests | |
| Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests | |
| Repurchase of redeemable noncontrolling interests and stock warrants | |
| | | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Payment of offering costs | |
| | Payment of offering costs | |
| | Payment of offering costs | |
| Security deposits | |
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | |
| NET CHANGE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH | |
| EFFECT OF FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION ON CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH | |
| CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH — Beginning of period | |
| CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH — End of period | |
| | RECONCILIATION OF CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH | RECONCILIATION OF CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH | |
| RECONCILIATION OF CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH | |
| RECONCILIATION OF CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH | |
| Beginning of period: | Beginning of period: | |
| Beginning of period: | |
| Beginning of period: | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 15,290,000 | | | $ | 14,388,000 | | | $ | 7,087,000 | |
| Restricted cash | Restricted cash | 556,000 | | | 202,000 | | | 16,000 | |
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | $ | 15,846,000 | | | $ | 14,590,000 | | | $ | 7,103,000 | |
| | End of period: | End of period: | |
| End of period: | |
| End of period: | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 17,411,000 | | | $ | 15,290,000 | | | $ | 14,388,000 | |
| Restricted cash | Restricted cash | 714,000 | | | 556,000 | | | 202,000 | |
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | $ | 18,125,000 | | | $ | 15,846,000 | | | $ | 14,590,000 | |
| | SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION | SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION | |
| SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION | |
| SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION | |
| Cash paid for: | |
| Cash paid for: | |
| Cash paid for: | Cash paid for: | |
| Interest | Interest | $ | 18,111,000 | | | $ | 13,506,000 | | | $ | 5,194,000 | |
| Interest | |
| Interest | |
| Income taxes | Income taxes | $ | 101,000 | | | $ | 30,000 | | | $ | 14,000 | |
| SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES | |
| Investing Activities: | |
| Accrued capital expenditures | $ | 1,616,000 | | | $ | 2,580,000 | | | $ | 5,391,000 | |
| SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES | |
| | Accrued developments and capital expenditures | |
| | Accrued developments and capital expenditures | |
| | Accrued developments and capital expenditures | |
| Capital expenditures from financing obligations | |
| | Tenant improvement overage | Tenant improvement overage | $ | 636,000 | | | $ | 195,000 | | | $ | 692,000 | |
| Accrued pre-acquisition expenses | $ | 0 | | | $ | 412,000 | | | $ | 154,000 | |
| The following represents the increase in certain assets and liabilities in connection with our acquisitions of real estate investments: | |
| | Right-of-use asset | $ | 0 | | | $ | 3,133,000 | | | $ | 0 | |
| Other assets | $ | 196,000 | | | $ | 112,000 | | | $ | 225,000 | |
| | Tenant improvement overage | |
| | Tenant improvement overage | |
| | Acquisition of real estate investments with assumed mortgage loans payable, net | |
| | Acquisition of real estate investments with assumed mortgage loans payable, net | |
| | Acquisition of real estate investments with assumed mortgage loans payable, net | |
| Assumption of mortgage loan payable for development | |
| Acquisition of real estate investment with financing obligation | |
| Issuance of common stock under the DRIP | |
| Distributions declared but not paid — common stockholders | |
| Distributions declared but not paid — limited partnership units | |
| Distributions declared but not paid — restricted stock units | |
| Accrued repurchase of redeemable noncontrolling interest | |
| Accrued offering costs | |
| Reclassification of noncontrolling interests to mezzanine equity | |
| Issuance of redeemable noncontrolling interests | |
| | The following represents the net increase (decrease) in certain assets and liabilities in connection with our acquisitions and dispositions of investments: | |
| | The following represents the net increase (decrease) in certain assets and liabilities in connection with our acquisitions and dispositions of investments: | |
| | The following represents the net increase (decrease) in certain assets and liabilities in connection with our acquisitions and dispositions of investments: | |
| Accounts and other receivables | |
| Accounts and other receivables | |
| Accounts and other receivables | |
| Issuance of note receivable | |
| Other assets, net | |
| Mortgage loans payable, net | Mortgage loans payable, net | $ | 0 | | | $ | 9,735,000 | | | $ | 5,808,000 | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 201,000 | | | $ | 1,146,000 | | | $ | 3,415,000 | |
| Operating lease liability | $ | 0 | | | $ | 4,489,000 | | | $ | 0 | |
| Security deposits and prepaid rent | $ | 11,000 | | | $ | 1,601,000 | | | $ | 2,193,000 | |
| Financing Activities: | |
| Issuance of common stock under the DRIP | $ | 19,862,000 | | | $ | 25,533,000 | | | $ | 17,612,000 | |
| Distributions declared but not paid | $ | 2,764,000 | | | $ | 4,086,000 | | | $ | 3,459,000 | |
| Accrued stockholder servicing fee | $ | 6,100,000 | | | $ | 12,610,000 | | | $ | 16,395,000 | |
| Accrued Contingent Advisor Payment | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 7,866,000 | |
| Receivable from transfer agent | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,670,000 | |
|
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS — (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021
(In thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Financing obligations | $ | 12 | | | $ | 65 | | | $ | — | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | (1,560) | | | $ | 15,674 | | | $ | (161) | |
| Security deposits and other liabilities | $ | (907) | | | $ | 15,919 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Merger and AHI Acquisition (Note 1): | | | | | |
| Issuance of limited partnership units in the AHI Acquisition | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 131,674 | |
| Implied issuance of GAHR III common stock in exchange for net assets acquired and purchase of noncontrolling interests in connection with the Merger | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 722,169 | |
| Fair value of mortgage loans payable and lines of credit and term loans assumed in the Merger | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 507,503 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 20182021
The use of the words “we,” “us” or “our” refers to Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT, IV, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT IV Holdings, LP, except where otherwise noted.
1. Organization and Description of Business
Griffin-AmericanOverview and Background
American Healthcare REIT, IV, Inc., a Maryland corporation, invests inis a self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, that acquires, owns and operates a diversified portfolio of clinical healthcare real estate properties, focusing primarily on outpatient medical office buildings, senior housing, skilled nursing facilities, or SNFs, and senior housing facilities that produce current income.other healthcare-related facilities. We also operate healthcare-related facilities utilizing the structure permitted by the REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007, which is commonly referred to as a “RIDEA” structure (the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, authorizing the RIDEA structure were enacted as part of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008). Our healthcare facilities operated under a RIDEA structure include our senior housing operating properties, or SHOP, and our integrated senior health campuses. We qualifiedhave originated and acquired secured loans and may also originate and acquire other real estate-related investments on an infrequent and opportunistic basis. We generally seek investments that produce current income; however, we have selectively developed, and may continue to selectively develop, healthcare real estate properties. We have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or REIT under the Code for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2016,purposes. We believe that we have been organized and operated, and we intend to continue to qualify to be taxedoperate, in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT.REIT under the Code.
We raised $754,118,000 throughOn October 1, 2021, Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc., or GAHR III, merged with and into a best efforts initial public offering,wholly-owned subsidiary, or Merger Sub, of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV, Inc., or GAHR IV, with Merger Sub being the surviving company, which we refer to as the REIT Merger, and our operating partnership, Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV Holdings, LP, or GAHR IV Operating Partnership, merged with and into Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Holdings, LP, or the Surviving Partnership, with the Surviving Partnership being the surviving entity, which we refer to as the Partnership Merger and, together with the REIT Merger, the Merger. Following the Merger on October 1, 2021, our company, or the Combined Company, was renamed American Healthcare REIT, Inc. and the Surviving Partnership was renamed American Healthcare REIT Holdings, LP, or our initial offering,operating partnership.
Also on October 1, 2021, immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger, GAHR III acquired a newly formed entity, American Healthcare Opps Holdings, LLC, or NewCo, which we refer to as the AHI Acquisition, pursuant to a contribution and issued 75,639,681 aggregate sharesexchange agreement dated June 23, 2021, or the Contribution Agreement, between GAHR III; our operating partnership; American Healthcare Investors, LLC, or AHI; Griffin Capital Company, LLC, or Griffin Capital; Platform Healthcare Investor T-II, LLC; Flaherty Trust; and Jeffrey T. Hanson, the non-executive Chairman of our Class Tboard of directors, or our board, Danny Prosky, our Chief Executive Officer, President and Class I sharesdirector, and Mathieu B. Streiff, one of our common stock. In addition, during our initial offering, we issued 3,253,535 aggregate sharesdirectors, or collectively, the AHI Principals.NewCo owned substantially all of our Class Tthe business and Class I common stock pursuantoperations of AHI, as well as all of the equity interests in (i) Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV Advisor, LLC, or GAHR IV Advisor, a subsidiary of AHI that served as the external advisor of GAHR IV, and (ii) Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Advisor, LLC, or GAHR III Advisor, also referred to our distribution reinvestment plan, as amended, or the DRIP, for a total of $31,021,000 in distributions reinvested. Following the deregistration of our initial offering, we continued issuing shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP through a subsequent offering, or the 2019 DRIP Offering. We commenced offering shares pursuant to the 2019 DRIP Offering on March 1, 2019, following the termination of our initial offering on February 15, 2019. As of December 31, 2020, a total of $41,471,000 in distributions were reinvested that resulted in 4,342,059 shares of our common stock being issued pursuant to the 2019 DRIP Offering. We collectively refer to the DRIP portion of our initial offering and the 2019 DRIP Offering as our DRIP Offerings. former advisor, a subsidiary of AHI that served as the external advisor of GAHR III.
See Note 12, Equity4, Business Combinations — Distribution Reinvestment Plan and Share Repurchase Plan,2021 Business Combinations, for a further discussion.discussion of the Merger and the AHI Acquisition.
Operating Partnership
We conduct substantially all of our operations through Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV Holdings, LP, orour operating partnership, and we are the sole general partner of our operating partnership. We are externally advisedAs of both December 31, 2023 and 2022, we owned 95.0% of the operating partnership units, or OP units, in our operating partnership, and the remaining 5.0% limited OP units were owned by Griffin-American Healthcarethe NewCo Sellers, as defined in Note 4, Business Combinations — 2021 Business Combinations. See Note 12, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests, and Note 13, Equity — Noncontrolling Interests in Total Equity, for a further discussion of the ownership in our operating partnership.
Public Offerings
As of December 31, 2023, after taking into consideration the Merger and the impact of the reverse stock split as discussed in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, we had issued 65,445,557 shares for a total of $2,737,716,000 of common stock since February 26, 2014 in our initial public offerings and our distribution reinvestment plan, or DRIP, offerings (including historical offering amounts sold by GAHR III and GAHR IV prior to the Merger).
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV Advisor, LLC, or our advisor,INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
On February 9, 2024, pursuant to an advisory agreement,a Registration Statement filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on Form S-11 (File No. 333-267464), as amended, we closed our underwritten public offering, or the Advisory Agreement, between us and our advisor. The Advisory Agreement was effective as2024 Offering, through which we issued 64,400,000 shares of February 16, 2016 and hadcommon stock, $0.01 par value per share, for a one-year initial term, subject to successive one-year renewals upontotal of $772,800,000 in gross offering proceeds. Such amounts include the mutual consentexercise in full of the parties. The Advisory Agreement was last renewed pursuantunderwriters’ overallotment option to purchase up to an additional 8,400,000 shares of common stock. These shares are listed on New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, under the mutual consent of the partiestrading symbol “AHR” and began trading on February 11, 20217, 2024.
See Note 13, Equity — Common Stock, and expires on February 16, 2022. Our advisor uses its best efforts, subject to the oversight and reviewNote 13, Equity — Distribution Reinvestment Plan, for a further discussion of our board of directors, or our board, to, among other things, research, identify, review and make investments in and dispositions of properties and securities on our behalf consistent with our investment policies and objectives. public offerings.
Our advisor performs its duties and responsibilities under the Advisory Agreement as our fiduciary. Our advisor is 75.0% owned and managed by wholly owned subsidiaries of American Healthcare Investors, LLC, or American Healthcare Investors, and 25.0% owned by a wholly owned subsidiary of Griffin Capital Company, LLC, or Griffin Capital, or collectively, our co-sponsors. American Healthcare Investors is 47.1% owned by AHI Group Holdings, LLC, or AHI Group Holdings, 45.1% indirectly owned by Colony Capital, Inc. (NYSE: CLNY), or Colony Capital, and 7.8% owned by James F. Flaherty III, a former partner of Colony Capital. We are not affiliated with Griffin Capital, Griffin Capital Securities, LLC, or our dealer manager, Colony Capital or Mr. Flaherty; however, we are affiliated with our advisor, American Healthcare Investors and AHI Group Holdings. In October 2020, our board established a special committee of our board, which consists of all of our independent directors, to investigate and analyze strategic alternatives, including but not limited to, the sale of our assets, a listing of our shares on a national securities exchange, or a merger with another entity, including a merger with another unlisted entity that we expect would enhance our value.Real Estate Investments Portfolio
We currently operate through 4four reportable business segments: integrated senior health campuses, outpatient medical, or OM, (which was formerly known as medical office buildings, senior housing, senior housing — RIDEAor MOBs), triple-net leased properties and skilled nursing facilities.SHOP. As of December 31, 2020,2023, we owned 89 properties, comprising 94and/or operated 296 buildings orand integrated senior health campuses including completed development and expansion projects representing approximately 4,863,00018,822,000 square feet of gross leasable area, or GLA, for an aggregate contract purchase price of $1,089,431,000. As$4,473,543,000. In addition, as of December 31, 2020,2023, we also owned a 6.0% interest in a joint venture which owns a portfolio of integrated senior health campuses and ancillary businesses.real estate-related debt investment purchased for $60,429,000.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist in understanding our accompanying consolidated financial statements. Such consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto are the representations of our management, who are responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, in all material respects, and have been consistently applied in preparing our accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Basis of Presentation
Our accompanying consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our operating partnership, and the wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiaries of our operating partnership and all non-wholly owned subsidiaries in which we have control, as well as any VIEs, in which we are the primary beneficiary. The portion of equity in any subsidiary that is not wholly owned by us is presented in our accompanying consolidated financial statements as a noncontrolling interest. We evaluate our ability to control an entity, and whether the entity is a VIE and we are the primary beneficiary, by considering substantive terms of the arrangement and identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impacts the entity’s economic performance.
On November 15, 2022, we effected a one-for-four reverse stock split of our common stock and a corresponding reverse split of the OP units, or the Reverse Splits. All numbers of common shares and per share data, as well as the OP units, in our accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes have been retroactively adjusted for all periods presented to give effect to the Reverse Splits.
We operate and intend to continue to operate in an umbrella partnership REIT structure in which our operating partnership, or wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiaries of our operating partnership and all non-wholly owned subsidiaries of which we have control will own substantially all of the interests in properties acquired on our behalf. We areare the sole general partner of our operating partnership and as of both December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, we owned greater than a 99.99%95.0% general partnership interest therein. Our advisor is a limited partner,therein, and as of both December 31, 2020 and 2019, owned less than a 0.01% noncontrollingthe remaining 5.0% limited partnership interest was owned by the NewCo Sellers, as defined in Note 4, Business Combinations — 2021 Business Combinations.
The accounts of our operating partnership are consolidated in our operating partnership.
Becauseaccompanying consolidated financial statements because we are the sole general partner of our operating partnership and have unilateral control over its management and major operating decisions (even if additional limited partners are admitted to our operating partnership), the accounts of our operating partnership are consolidated in our accompanying consolidated financial statements.. All intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of our accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of our consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
to, the initial and recurring valuation of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed through property acquisitions including through business combinations, goodwill and its impairment, revenues and grant income, allowance for credit losses, impairment of long-lived and intangible assets and contingencies. These estimates are made and evaluated on an on-going basis using information that is currently available as well as various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates, perhaps in material adverse ways, and those estimates could be different under different assumptions or conditions.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
Cash and cash equivalents consist of all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Restricted cash primarily comprises lender required accounts for property taxes, tenant improvements, capital improvements and insurance, which are restricted as to use or withdrawal.
Leases
On January 1, 2019, we adoptedLessee: We determine if a contract is a lease upon inception of the lease and maintain a distinction between finance and operating leases.Pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 842, Leases, or ASC Topic 842. ASC Topic 842 supersedes ASC Topic 840, Leases, or ASC Topic 840. We adopted ASC Topic 842 using the modified retrospective approach whereby the cumulative effect of adoption was recognized on the adoption date and prior periods were not restated. There was no net cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2019 as a result of this adoption. Therefore, with respect to our leases as both lessees and lessors, information is presented under ASC Topic 842 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, and under ASC Topic 840 for the year ended December 31, 2018. We determine if a contract is a lease upon inception of the lease. We maintain a distinction between finance and operating leases, which is substantially similar to the classification criteria for distinguishing between capital leases and operating leases in the previous lease guidance.
Lessee: Pursuant to ASC Topic 842, lessees are required to recognize the following for all leases with terms greater than 12 months at the commencement date: (i) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease; and (ii) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
asset for the lease term. The lease liability is calculated by using either the implicit rate of the lease or the incremental borrowing rate. As a result of the adoption of ASC Topic 842 on January 1, 2019, we recognized an initial amount of operating lease liabilities of $5,334,000 in our consolidated balance sheet for all of our ground leases. In addition, we recorded corresponding right-of-use assets of $11,239,000, which represent the lease liabilities, net of the existing accrued straight-line rent liabilities and adjusted for unamortized above/below market ground lease intangibles. The accretion of lease liabilities and amortization expense on right-of-use assets for our operating leases are included in rental expenses, property operating expenses or general and administrative expenses in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.operations and comprehensive loss. Operating lease liabilities are calculated using our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available as of the lease commencement date.
For our finance leases, the accretion of lease liabilities are included in interest expense and the amortization expense on right-of-use assets are included in depreciation and amortization in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Further, finance lease assets are included within real estate investments, net and finance lease liabilities are included within financing obligations in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Lessor:Lessor: Pursuant to ASC Topic 842, lessors bifurcate lease revenues into lease components and non-lease components and separately recognize and disclose non-lease components that are executory in nature. Lease components continue to be recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and certain non-lease components may be accounted for under the revenue recognition guidance in ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, or ASC Topic 606. See the “Revenue Recognition” section below. ASC Topic 842 also provides for a practical expedient package that permits lessors to not separate non-lease components from the associated lease component if certain conditions are met. In addition, such practical expedient causes an entity to assess whether a contract is predominately leaselease- or service based,service-based, and recognize the revenue from the entire contract under the relevant accounting guidance. Effective upon our adoption of ASC Topic 842 on January 1, 2019, we continued toWe recognize revenue for our medical officeOM buildings senior housing and skilled nursing facilitiestriple-net leased properties segments under ASC Topic 842 as real estate revenue. Minimum annual rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease (including rent holidays). Differences between real estate revenue recognized and cash amounts contractually due from tenants under the lease agreements are recorded to deferred rent receivable, which is included in other assets, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Tenant reimbursement revenue, which comprises additional amounts recoverable from tenants for common area maintenance expenses and certain other recoverable expenses, are considered non-lease components and variable lease payments. We qualified for and elected the practical expedient as outlined above to combine the non-lease component with the lease component, which is the predominant component, and therefore the non-lease component is recognized as part of real estate revenue. In addition, as lessors, we exclude certain lessor costs (i.e., property taxes and insurance) paid directly by a lessee to third parties on our behalf from our measurement of variable lease revenue and associated expense (i.e., no gross up of revenue and expense for these costs); and include lessor costs that we paid and are reimbursed by the lessee in our measurement of variable lease revenue and associated expense (i.e., gross up revenue and expense for these costs). Therefore, we no longer record revenue or expense when the lessee pays the property taxes and insurance directly to a third party.
Our senior housing —At our RIDEA facilities, we offer residents room and board (lease component), standard meals and healthcare services (non-lease component), and certain ancillary services that are not contemplated in the lease with each resident (i.e., laundry, guest meals, etc.). For our senior housing — RIDEA facilities, we recognize revenue under ASC Topic 606 as resident fees and services, based on our predominance assessment from electing the practical expedient outlined above. See the “Revenue Recognition” section below.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
See Note 16,17, Leases, for a further discussion.discussion of our leases.
Revenue Recognition
Real Estate Revenue
Prior to January 1, 2019, minimum annual rental revenue was recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease (including rent holidays) in accordance with ASC Topic 840. Differences between real estate revenue recognized and cash amounts contractually due from tenants under the lease agreements were recorded to deferred rent receivable. Tenant reimbursement revenue, which comprises additional amounts recoverable from tenants for common area maintenance expenses and certain other recoverable expenses, was recognized as revenue in the period in which the related expenses were incurred. Tenant reimbursements were recognized and presented in accordance with ASC Subtopic 606-10-55-36, Revenue Recognition — Principal Versus Agent Consideration, or ASC Subtopic 606. ASC Subtopic 606 requires that these reimbursements be recorded on a gross basis as we are generally primarily responsible to fulfill the promise to provide specified goods and services. We recognized lease termination fees at such time when there was a signed termination letter agreement, all of the conditions of such agreement had been met and the tenant was no longer occupying the property.
Effective January 1, 2019, we recognize real estate revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 842. See the “Leases” section above.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Resident Fees and Services Revenue
We recognize resident fees and services revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606. A significant portion of resident fees and services revenue represents healthcare service revenue that is reported at the amount that we expect to be entitled to in exchange for providing patient care. These amounts are due from patients, third-party payors (including health insurers and government programs), other healthcare facilities, and others and includes variable consideration for retroactive revenue adjustments due to settlement of audits, reviews, and investigations. Generally, we bill the patients, third-party payors and other healthcare facilities several days after the services are performed. Revenue is recognized as performance obligations are satisfied. Consistent with healthcare industry accounting practices, any changes to these governmental revenue estimates are recorded in the period the change or adjustment becomes known based on final settlement. Any differences between recorded revenues and subsequent adjustments are reflected in operations in the year finalized.
Performance obligations are determined based on the nature of the services provided by us. Revenue for performance obligations satisfied over time is recognized based on actual charges incurred in relation to total expected (or actual) charges. This method provides a depiction of the transfer of services over the term of the performance obligation based on the inputs needed to satisfy the obligation. Generally, performance obligations satisfied over time relate to patients receiving long-term healthcare services, including rehabilitation services. We measure the performance obligation from admission into the facility to the point when we are no longer required to provide services to that patient. Revenue for performance obligations satisfied at a point in time is recognized when goods or services are provided and we do not believe we are required to provide additional goods or services to the patient. Generally, performance obligations satisfied at a point in time relate to sales of our pharmaceuticals business or to sales of ancillary supplies.
Because all of itsour performance obligations relate to contracts with a duration of less than one year, we have elected to apply the optional exemption provided in ASC Topic 606 and, therefore, are not required to disclose the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied at the end of the reporting period. The performance obligations for these contracts are generally completed within months of the end of the reporting period.
We determine the transaction price based on standard charges for goods and services provided, reduced, where applicable, by contractual adjustments provided to third-party payors, implicit price concessions provided to uninsured patients, and estimates of goods to be returned. We also determine the estimates of contractual adjustments based on Medicare and Medicaid pricing tables and historical experience. We determine the estimate of implicit price concessions based on the historical collection experience with each class of payor.
Agreements with third-party payors typically provide for payments at amounts less than established charges. The following is a summary of the payment arrangements with major third-party payors:
•Medicare: Certain healthcare services are paid at prospectively determined rates based on cost-reimbursement methodologies subject to certain limits.
•Medicaid: Reimbursements for Medicaid services are generally paid at prospectively determined rates. In the state of Indiana, we participate in an Upper Payment Limit program, or IGT, with various county hospital partners, which provides supplemental Medicaid payments to SNFs that are licensed to non-state, government-owned entities such as county hospital districts. We have operational responsibility through management agreements for facilities retained by the county hospital districts including this IGT. The licenses and management agreements between the nursing center division and hospital districts are terminable by either party to restore the previous licensed status.
•Other: Payment agreements with certain commercial insurance carriers, health maintenance organizations and preferred provider organizations provide for payment using prospectively determined rates per discharge, discounts from established charges and prospectively determined periodic rates.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Laws and regulations concerning government programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, are complex and subject to varying interpretation. As a result of investigations by governmental agencies, various healthcare organizations have received requests for information and notices regarding alleged noncompliance with those laws and regulations, which, in some instances, have resulted in organizations entering into significant settlement agreements. Compliance with such laws and regulations may also be subject to future government review and interpretation as well as significant regulatory action, including fines, penalties and potential exclusion from the related programs. There can be no assurance that regulatory authorities will not challenge our compliance with these laws and regulations, and it is not possible to determine the impact such claims or penalties would have upon us, if any.
Settlements with third-party payors for retroactive adjustments due to audits, reviews or investigations are considered variable consideration and are included in the determination of the estimated transaction price for providing patient care. These settlements are estimated based on the terms of the payment agreement with the payor, correspondence from the payor and our historical settlement activity, including an assessment to ensure that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the retroactive adjustment is subsequently resolved. Estimated settlements are adjusted in future periods as adjustments become known (that is, new information becomes available), or as years are settled or are no longer subject to such audits, reviews and investigations. Adjustments arising from a change in the transaction price were not significant for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.
Disaggregation of Resident Fees and Services Revenue
We disaggregate revenue from contracts with customers according to lines of business and payor classes. The transfer of goods and services may occur at a point in time or over time; in other words, revenue may be recognized over the course of the underlying contract, or may occur at a single point in time based upon a single transfer of control. This distinction is discussed in further detail below. We determine that disaggregating revenue into these categories achieves the disclosure objective to depict how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors.
ResidentThe following tables disaggregate our resident fees and services revenue includesby line of business, according to whether such revenue is recognized at a point in time or over time, for the years then ended (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Integrated
Senior Health
Campuses | | SHOP(1) | | Total |
| 2023: | | | | | |
| Over time | $ | 1,216,647 | | | $ | 182,200 | | | $ | 1,398,847 | |
| Point in time | 265,233 | | | 4,662 | | | 269,895 | |
| Total resident fees and services | $ | 1,481,880 | | | $ | 186,862 | | | $ | 1,668,742 | |
| | | | | |
| 2022: | | | | | |
| Over time | $ | 1,019,198 | | | $ | 154,268 | | | $ | 1,173,466 | |
| Point in time | 235,467 | | | 3,223 | | | 238,690 | |
| Total resident fees and services | $ | 1,254,665 | | | $ | 157,491 | | | $ | 1,412,156 | |
| | | | | |
| 2021: | | | | | |
| Over time | $ | 824,991 | | | $ | 96,000 | | | $ | 920,991 | |
| Point in time | 200,708 | | | 2,236 | | | 202,944 | |
| Total resident fees and services | $ | 1,025,699 | | | $ | 98,236 | | | $ | 1,123,935 | |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following tables disaggregate our resident fees and services revenue by payor class for the years then ended (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Integrated
Senior Health
Campuses | | SHOP(1) | | Total |
| 2023: | | | | | |
| Private and other payors | $ | 696,147 | | | $ | 174,439 | | | $ | 870,586 | |
| Medicare | 477,338 | | | 2,808 | | | 480,146 | |
| Medicaid | 308,395 | | | 9,615 | | | 318,010 | |
| Total resident fees and services | $ | 1,481,880 | | | $ | 186,862 | | | $ | 1,668,742 | |
| | | | | |
| 2022: | | | | | |
| Private and other payors | $ | 582,448 | | | $ | 144,771 | | | $ | 727,219 | |
| Medicare | 429,129 | | | — | | | 429,129 | |
| Medicaid | 243,088 | | | 12,720 | | | 255,808 | |
| Total resident fees and services | $ | 1,254,665 | | | $ | 157,491 | | | $ | 1,412,156 | |
| | | | | |
| 2021: | | | | | |
| Private and other payors | $ | 462,828 | | | $ | 94,673 | | | $ | 557,501 | |
| Medicare | 349,876 | | | — | | | 349,876 | |
| Medicaid | 212,995 | | | 3,563 | | | 216,558 | |
| Total resident fees and services | $ | 1,025,699 | | | $ | 98,236 | | | $ | 1,123,935 | |
___________
(1)Includes fees for basic housing, andas well as fees for assisted living or skilled nursing care. We record revenue when services are rendered at amounts billable to individual residents. Residency agreements are generally for a term of 30 days, with resident fees billed monthly in advance. For patients under reimbursement arrangements with Medicaid, revenue is recorded based on contractually agreed-upon amounts or rates on a per resident, daily basis or as services are rendered.
The following tables disaggregate our resident fees and services revenue by line of business, according to whether such revenue is recognized at a point in time or over time:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | Point in
Time | | Over Time | | Total | | Point in
Time | | Over Time | | Total | | Point in
Time | | Over Time | | Total |
| Senior housing — RIDEA | | $ | 964,000 | | | $ | 66,829,000 | | | $ | 67,793,000 | | | $ | 715,000 | | | $ | 45,445,000 | | | $ | 46,160,000 | | | $ | 847,000 | | | $ | 36,010,000 | | | $ | 36,857,000 | |
The following tables disaggregate our resident fees and services revenue by payor class:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Years Ended December 31, |
| | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Private and other payors | | | | | | $ | 61,045,000 | | | $ | 40,140,000 | | | $ | 30,775,000 | |
| Medicaid | | | | | | 6,748,000 | | | 6,020,000 | | | 6,082,000 | |
| Total resident fees and services | | | | | | $ | 67,793,000 | | | $ | 46,160,000 | | | $ | 36,857,000 | |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Accounts Receivable, Net — Resident Fees and Services Revenue
The beginning and ending balances of accounts receivable, net — resident fees and services are as follows:follows (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Private
and
Other Payors | | Medicare | | Medicaid | | Total |
Beginning balance — January 1, 2023 | | $ | 55,484 | | | $ | 45,669 | | | $ | 20,832 | | | $ | 121,985 | |
Ending balance — December 31, 2023 | | 66,218 | | | 51,260 | | | 30,799 | | | 148,277 | |
| Increase | | $ | 10,734 | | | $ | 5,591 | | | $ | 9,967 | | | $ | 26,292 | |
Deferred Revenue — Resident Fees and Services Revenue
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Medicaid | | Private
and
Other Payors | | Total |
Beginning balance — January 1, 2020 | | $ | 2,731,000 | | | $ | 281,000 | | | $ | 3,012,000 | |
Ending balance — December 31, 2020 | | 1,123,000 | | | 358,000 | | | 1,481,000 | |
| (Decrease)/increase | | $ | (1,608,000) | | | $ | 77,000 | | | $ | (1,531,000) | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Total |
Beginning balance — January 1, 2023 | | $ | 17,901 | |
Ending balance — December 31, 2023 | | 23,372 | |
| Increase | | $ | 5,471 | |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Financing Component
We have elected a practical expedient allowed under ASC Topic 606 and, therefore, we do not adjust the promised amount of consideration from patients and third-party payors for the effects of a significant financing component due to our expectation that the period between the time the service is provided to a patient and the time that the patient or a third-party payor pays for that service will be one year or less.
Contract Costs
We have applied athe practical expedient provided by FASB ASC Topic 340, Other Assets and Deferred Costs, and, therefore, all incremental customer contract acquisition costs are expensed as they are incurred since the amortization period of the asset that we otherwise would have recognized is one year or less in duration.
Government Grants
We have been granted stimulus funds through various federalResident and state government programs, such as through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or the CARES Act, passed by the federal government on March 27, 2020, which were established for eligible healthcare providers to preserve liquidity in response to lost revenues and/or increased healthcare expenses (as such terms are defined in the applicable regulatory guidance) associated with the coronavirus, or COVID-19, pandemic. Such grants are not loans and, as such, are not required to be repaid, subject to certain conditions. We recognize government grants as grant income or as a reduction of property operating expenses, as applicable, in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations when there is reasonable assurance that the grants will be received and all conditions to retain the funds will be met. We adjust our estimates and assumptions based on the applicable guidance provided by the government and the best available information that we have. Any stimulus or other relief funds received that are not expected to be used in accordance with such terms and conditions will be returned to the government. For the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized government grants of $1,005,000as grant income. As of and for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we did 0t recognize any government grants.
Tenant and Resident Receivables and Allowances
On January 1, 2020, we adopted ASC Topic 326, Financial Instruments Credit Losses, or ASC Topic 326. We adopted ASC Topic 326 using the modified retrospective approach whereby the cumulative effect of adoption was recognized on the adoption dateResident receivables, which are related to resident fees and prior periods were not restated. There was no net cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2020.
Resident receivablesservices revenue, are carried net of an allowance for credit losses. An allowance is maintained for estimated losses resulting from the inability of residents and payors to meet the contractual obligations under their lease or service agreements. Substantially all of such allowances are recorded as direct reductions of resident fees and services revenue as contractual adjustments provided to third-party payors or implicit price concessions in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.operations and comprehensive loss. Our determination of the adequacy of these allowances is based primarily upon evaluations of historical loss experience, the residents’ financial condition, security deposits, cash collection patterns by payor and by state, current economic conditions, future expectations in estimating credit losses and other relevant factors. PriorTenant receivables, which are related to our adoption of ASC Topic 326 on January 1, 2020, resident receivables were carried net of an allowance for uncollectible amounts.
Tenant receivablesreal estate revenue, and unbilled deferred rent receivables are reduced for uncollectible amounts where collectability is not probable, which are recognized as direct reductions of real estate revenue in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Prioroperations and comprehensive loss.
The following is a summary of our adjustments to our adoption of ASC Topic 842 on January 1, 2019, tenant receivables and unbilled deferred rent receivables were reducedallowances for uncollectible
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
amounts. Such amounts were charged to bad debt expense, which was included in general and administrative in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, we had $2,086,000 and $902,000, respectively, in allowances, which were determined necessary to reduce receivables by our expected future credit losses. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023 and 2018,2022 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 |
Beginning balance | | $ | 14,071 | | | $ | 12,378 | |
| Additional allowances | | 20,774 | | | 21,538 | |
| Write-offs | | (8,778) | | | (10,684) | |
| Recoveries collected or adjustments | | (9,030) | | | (9,161) | |
Ending balance | | $ | 17,037 | | | $ | 14,071 | |
Real Estate Investments Purchase Price Allocation
Upon the acquisition of real estate properties or entities owning real estate properties, we increased allowances by $1,614,000, $2,301,000 and $1,790,000, respectively, and reduced allowances for collections or adjustments by $207,000, $1,758,000 and $531,000, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we did not write off any of our receivables directly to bad debt expense or as direct adjustments to revenue. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, $223,000, $962,000 and $21,000, respectively, of our receivables were written off against the related allowances.
Property Acquisitions
We determine whether athe transaction is a business combination, which requires that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed constitute a business. If the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are not a business, we account for the transaction as an asset acquisition. Under both methods, we recognize the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed; however, for a transaction accounted for as an asset acquisition, we capitalize transaction costs and allocate the purchase price to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on theirusing a relative fair values. We immediately expense acquisition related expenses associated withvalue method allocating all accumulated costs, whereas for a transaction accounted for as a business combination, and capitalize acquisition related expenses directlywe immediately expense transaction costs incurred associated with anthe business combination and allocate the purchase price based on the estimated fair value of each separately identifiable asset acquisition.and liability. For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, our investment transactions were accounted for as asset acquisitions or as business combinations, as applicable. See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net — Acquisitions of Real Estate Investments, and Note 4, Business Combinations, for a further discussion.
We, with assistance from independent valuation specialists, measure the fair value of tangible and identified intangible assets and liabilities, as applicable, based on their respective fair values for acquired properties. Our method for allocating the purchase price to acquired investments in real estate requires us to make subjective assessments for determining fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. This includes determining the value of the buildings, land, leasehold interests, furniture, fixtures and equipment, above- or below-market rent, in-place leases, master leases, tenant improvements, above- or below-market debt assumed, and derivative financial instruments assumed.assumed, and noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, if any. These estimates require significant judgment and in some cases involve complex calculations. These allocation assessments directly impact our results of operations, as amounts allocated to certain assets and liabilities have different depreciation or amortization
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
lives. In addition, we amortize the value assigned to above- or below-market rent as a component of revenue, unlike in-place leases and other intangibles, which we include in depreciation and amortization in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.operations and comprehensive loss.
The determination of the fair value of land is based upon comparable sales data. In cases where a leasehold interest in the land is acquired, only the above/below market consideration is necessary where the value of the leasehold interest is determined by discounting the difference between the contract ground lease payments and a market ground lease payment back to a present value as of the acquisition date. The fair value of buildings is based upon our determination of the value under two methods: one, as if it were to be replaced and vacant using cost data and, two, also using a residual technique based on discounted cash flow models, as vacant. Factors considered by us include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. We also recognize the fair value of furniture, fixtures and equipment on the premises, as well as the above- or below-market rent, the value of in-place leases, master leases, above- or below-market debt and derivative financial instruments assumed.
The value of the above- or below-market component of the acquired in-place leases is determined based upon the present value (using a discount rate that reflects the risks associated with the acquired leases) of the difference between: (i) the level payment equivalent of the contract rent paid pursuant to the lease; and (ii) our estimate of market rent payments taking into account the expected market rent steps throughout the lease.growth. In the case of leases with options, a case-by-case analysis is performed based on all facts and circumstances of the specific lease to determine whether the option will be assumed to be exercised. The amounts related to above-market leases are included in identified intangible assets, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are amortized againstas a decrease to real estate revenue over the remaining non-cancelable lease term of the acquired leases with each property. The amounts related to below-market leases are included in identified intangible liabilities, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are amortized as an increase to real estate revenue over the remaining non-cancelable lease term plus any below-market renewal options of the acquired leases with each property.
The value of in-place lease costs are based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of the tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with the tenants. Characteristics considered by us in allocating these values include the nature and extent of the credit quality and expectations of lease renewals, among other factors. The in-place lease intangible represents the value related to the economic benefit for acquiring a property with in-place leases as opposed to a vacant property, which is evaluated based on a review of comparable leases for a similar property, terms and conditions for marketing and executing new leases, and implied in the difference between the value of the whole property “as is” and “as vacant.” The net amounts related
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
to in-place lease costs are included in identified intangible assets, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are amortized as an increase to depreciation and amortization expense over the average downtime of the acquired leases with each property. The net amounts related to the value of tenant relationships, if any, are included in identified intangible assets, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are amortized as an increase to depreciation and amortization expense over the average remaining non-cancelable lease term of the acquired leases plus the market renewal lease term. The value of a master lease, if any, in which a previous owner or a tenant is relieved of specific rental obligations as additional space is leased, is determined by discounting the expected real estate revenue associated with the master lease space over the assumed lease-up period.
The value of above- or below-market debt is determined based upon the present value of the difference between the cash flow stream of the assumed mortgage and the cash flow stream of a market rate mortgage at the time of assumption. The net value of above- or below-market debt is included in mortgage loans payable, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets and is amortized as an increase or decrease to interest expense, as applicable, over the remaining term of the assumed mortgage.
The value of derivative financial instruments, if any, is determined in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, and is included in other assets or other liabilities in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The values of contingent consideration assets and liabilities if any, are analyzed at the time of acquisition. For contingent purchase options, the fair market value of the acquired asset is compared to the specified option price at the exercise date. If the option price is below market, it is assumed to be exercised and the difference between the fair market value and the option price is discounted to the present value at the time of acquisition.
The values of the redeemable and nonredeemable noncontrolling interests are estimated by applying the income approach based on a discounted cash flow analysis. The fair value measurement may apply significant inputs that are not observable in the market. See Note 4, Business Combinations — 2021 Business Combinations — Fair Value of Noncontrolling Interests, for a further discussion of our fair value measurement approach and the significant inputs used in the values of redeemable and nonredeemable noncontrolling interests in GAHR IV.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Real Estate Investments, Net
We carry our operating properties at our historical cost less accumulated depreciation. The cost of operating properties includes the cost of land and completed buildings and related improvements.improvements, including those related to financing obligations. Expenditures that increase the service life of properties are capitalized and the cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to expense as incurred. The cost of buildings and capital improvements is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the buildings and capital improvements, up to 39 years, and the cost for tenant improvements is depreciated over the shorter of the lease term or useful life, up to 2134 years. The cost of furniture, fixtures and equipment is depreciated over the estimated useful life, up to 2028 years. When depreciable property is retired, replaced or disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation is removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in earnings.
As part of the leasing process, we may provide the lessee with an allowance for the construction of leasehold improvements. These leasehold improvements are capitalized and recorded as tenant improvements and depreciated over the shorter of the useful life of the improvements or the lease term. If the allowance represents a payment for a purpose other than funding leasehold improvements, or in the event we are not considered the owner of the improvements, the allowance is considered to be a lease inducement and is included in other assets, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Lease inducement is recognizedamortized over the lease term as a reduction of real estate revenue on a straight-line basis. Factors considered during this evaluation include, among other things, who holds legal title to the improvements as well as other controlling rights provided by the lease agreement and provisions for substantiation of such costs e.g(e.g., unilateral control of the tenant space during the build-out process.process). Determination of the appropriate accounting for the payment of a tenant allowance is made on a lease-by-lease basis, considering the facts and circumstances of the individual tenant lease. Recognition of lease revenue commences when the lessee is given possession of the leased space upon completion of tenant improvements when we are the owner of the leasehold improvements. However, when the leasehold improvements are owned by the tenant, the lease inception date (and the date on which recognition of lease revenue commences) is the date the tenant obtains possession of the leased space for purposes of constructing its leasehold improvements.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of consideration paid over the fair value of underlying identifiable net assets of a business acquired in a business combination. Our goodwill has an indeterminate life and is not amortized, but is tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. We take a qualitative approach, as applicable, to consider whether an impairment of goodwill exists prior to quantitatively determining the fair value of the reporting unit in step one of the impairment test. When step one of the impairment test is utilized, we compare the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. We recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied value in the current period.
See Note 4, Business Combinations, for a further discussion of goodwill recognized in connection with our business combinations, and Note 18, Segment Reporting, for a further discussion of goodwill allocation by segment and impairment of goodwill.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangible Assets
We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in real estate that we carry at our historical cost less accumulated depreciation, for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying value may not be recoverable. Indicators weWe consider important and that we believe could trigger an impairment review include,the following indicators, among others, the following:in our evaluation of impairment:
•significant negative industry or economic trends;
•a significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results; and
•a significant change in the extent or manner in which the asset is used or significant physical change in the asset.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
If indicators of impairment of our long-lived assets are present, we evaluate the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying operations. In performing this evaluation, we consider market conditions and our current intentions with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. We adjust the net book value of leased properties we lease to others and other long-lived assets to fair value if the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows, including sales proceeds, is less than carrying value. We recognize an impairment loss at the time we make any such determination.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
We test indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, for impairment at least annually, and more frequently if indicators arise. We first assess qualitative factors to determine the likelihood that the fair value of the reporting group is less than its carrying value. If the carrying amount of an indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized. Fair values of other indefinite-lived intangible assets are usually determined based on discounted cash flows or appraised values, as appropriate.
If impairment indicators arise with respect to intangible assets with finite useful lives, we evaluate impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, then we estimate the fair value of the asset and compare the estimated fair value to the intangible asset’s carrying value. For all of our reporting units, we recognize any shortfall from carrying value as an impairment loss in the current period.
We test other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually, and more frequently if indicators arise. We first assess qualitative factors to determine the likelihood that the fair value of the reporting group is less than its carrying value. If the carrying amount of an indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized. Fair values of other indefinite-lived intangible assets are usually determined based on discounted cash flows or appraised values, as appropriate.
For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we did not incur any impairment losses with respect to intangible assets. See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net — Impairment of Real Estate Investments, for a further discussion of impairment of long-lived assets. See Note 6, Identified Intangible Assets and Liabilities, for a further discussion of impairment of intangible assets.
Properties Held for Sale
A property or a group of properties is reported in discontinued operations in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for current and prior periods if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results when eithereither: (i) the component has been disposed of;of or (ii) is classified as held for sale. At such time as a property is held for sale, such property is carried at the lower ofof: (i) its carrying amount or (ii) fair value less costs to sell. In addition, a property being held for sale ceases to be depreciated. We will classify operating properties as property held for sale in the period in which all of the following criteria are met:
•management, having the authority to approve the action, commits to a plan to sell the asset;
•the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets;
•an active program to locate a buyer or buyers and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the asset has been initiated;
•the sale of the asset is probable and the transfer of the asset is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year;
•the asset is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value; and
•given the actions required to complete the plan to sell the asset, it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan would be made or that the plan would be withdrawn.
Our properties held for sale are included in other assets, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We did not recognize impairment charges on properties held for sale for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, we did not dispose of any held for sale properties. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we disposed of two integrated senior health campuses included in properties held for sale for an aggregate contract sales price of $18,700,000 and recognized an aggregate net gain on sale of $3,421,000. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we disposed of two integrated senior health campuses included in properties held for sale for an aggregate contract sales price of $500,000 and recognized an aggregate net loss on sale of $(114,000).
For the year ended December 31, 2021, our former advisor agreed to waive $93,000 in disposition fees that may otherwise have been due to our former advisor pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, as defined in Note 14, Related Party Transactions. Our former advisor did not receive any additional securities, shares of stock or any other form of consideration or any repayment as a result of the waiver of such disposition fees. See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net — Dispositions of Real Estate Investments, for a further discussion.discussion of our property dispositions, as well as Note 13, Equity — Noncontrolling Interests in Total Equity, for a discussion of the disposition of membership interests in a consolidated limited liability company.
Debt Security Investment, Net
We classify our marketable debt security investment as held-to-maturity because we have the positive intent and ability to hold the security to maturity, and we have not recorded any unrealized holding gains or losses on such investment. Our held-to-maturity security is recorded at amortized cost and adjusted for the amortization of premiums or discounts through maturity.
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
See Note 5, Debt Security Investment, Net, for a further discussion.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We are exposed to the effect of interest rate changes in the normal course of business. We seek to mitigate these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures, which include the occasional use of derivatives. Our primary strategy in entering into derivative contracts, such as fixedfixed-rate interest rate swaps and interest rate caps, is to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements by effectively converting a portion of our variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt. We do not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes.
Derivatives are recognized as either other assets or other liabilities in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are measured at fair value. We do not designate our derivative instruments as hedge instruments as defined by guidance under ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and HedgingHedges, or ASC Topic 815, which allows for gains and losses on derivatives designated as hedges to be offset by the change in value of the hedged items or to be deferred in other comprehensive income (loss). Changes in the fair value of our derivative financial instruments are recorded as a component of interest expense in gain or loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.operations and comprehensive loss.
See Note 8,10, Derivative Financial Instruments, and Note 14,15, Fair Value Measurements, for a further discussion of our derivative financial instruments.
Fair Value Measurements
The fair value of certain assets and liabilities is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, we follow a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of our reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and our reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. An active market is defined as a market in which transactions for the assets or liabilities occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
See Note 14,15, Fair Value Measurements, for a further discussion.
Real Estate Deposits
Real estate deposits may include refundable and non-refundable funds held by escrow agents and others to be applied towards the acquisition of real estate investments, and such future investments are subject to substantial conditions to closing.
Other Assets, Net
Other assets, net primarily consistconsists of our investment in an unconsolidated entity, deferred financing costs on our line of credit and term loans,inventory, prepaid expenses and deposits, lease commissions anddeferred financing costs related to our lines of credit, deferred rent receivables.receivables, deferred tax assets, investments in unconsolidated entities, lease inducements and lease commissions. Inventory consists primarily of pharmaceutical and medical supplies and is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Deferred financing costs onrelated to our linelines of credit and term loans include amounts paid to lenders and others to obtain such financing. Such costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the related line of credit and term loans,loan, which approximates the effective interest rate method. Amortization of deferred financing costs onrelated to our linelines of credit and term loans areis included in interest expense in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Prepaid expenses are amortized over the related contract periods.operations and comprehensive loss. Lease commissions are amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the related lease.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Prepaid expenses are amortized over the related contract periods.We report investments in unconsolidated entities using the equity method of accounting when we have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies. Under the equity method, our share of the investee’s
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
earnings or losses is included in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.operations and comprehensive loss. We generally do not recognize equity method losses when such losses exceed our net equity method investment balance unless we have committed to provide such investee additional financial support or guaranteed its obligations. To the extent that our cost basis is different from the basis reflected at the entity level, the basis difference is generally amortized over the lives of the related assets and liabilities, and such amortization is included in our share of equity in earnings of the entity. The initial carrying value of investments in unconsolidated entities is based on the amount paid to purchase the entity interest or the estimated fair value of the assets prior to the sale of interests in the entity. We have elected to follow the cumulative earnings approach when classifying distributions received from equity method investments in our consolidated statements of cash flows, whereby any distributions received up to the amount of cumulative equity earnings wouldwill be considered a return on investment and classified in operating activities and any excess distributions would be considered a return of investment and classified in investing activities. We evaluate our equity method investments for impairment based upon a comparison of the estimated fair value of the equity method investment to its carrying value. When we determine a decline in the estimated fair value of such an investment below its carrying value is other-than-temporary, an impairment is recorded. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we did not incur any impairment losses from unconsolidated entities.
See Note 5,7, Other Assets, Net, for a further discussion.
Income TaxesAccounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, accounts payable and accrued liabilities primarily include insurance reserves of $44,548,000 and $39,893,000, respectively, reimbursement of payroll-related costs to the managers of our SHOP and integrated senior health campuses of $42,698,000 and $38,624,000, respectively, accrued developments and capital expenditures to unaffiliated third parties of $24,881,000 and $30,211,000, respectively, accrued property taxes of $23,549,000 and $24,926,000, respectively, and accrued distributions to common stockholders of $16,557,000 and $26,484,000, respectively.
Stock Based Compensation
We qualified,follow ASC Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation, or ASC Topic 718, to account for our stock compensation pursuant to the Second Amended and electedRestated 2015 Incentive Plan, or the AHR Incentive Plan, using the fair value method, which requires an estimate of fair value of the award at the time of grant and recognition of compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the awards. Forfeitures of stock based awards are recognized as an adjustment to compensation expense as they occur. Awards granted under the AHR Incentive Plan consist of restricted stock or units issued to our executive officers and employees, in addition to restricted stock issued to our directors. See Note 13, Equity — Equity Compensation Plans, for a further discussion of awards granted under the AHR Incentive Plan.
Foreign Currency
We have real estate investments in the United Kingdom, or UK, and Isle of Man for which the functional currency is the UK Pound Sterling, or GBP. We translate the results of operations of our foreign real estate investments into United States Dollars, or USD, using the average currency rates of exchange in effect during the period, and we translate assets and liabilities using the currency exchange rate in effect at the end of the period. The resulting foreign currency translation adjustments are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, a component of stockholders’ equity, in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Certain balance sheet items, primarily equity and capital-related accounts, are reflected at the historical currency exchange rates. We also have intercompany notes and payables denominated in GBP with our UK subsidiaries. Gains or losses resulting from remeasuring such intercompany notes and payables into USD at the end of each reporting period are reflected in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. When such intercompany notes and payables are deemed to be of a long-term investment nature, they will be reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are remeasured into USD at the rates of exchange prevailing on the date of the transactions. The effects of transaction gains or losses are included in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
Income Taxes
We qualify, and elect to be taxed, as a REIT under the Code, for federal income tax purposes beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2016, and we intend to continue to qualify to be taxed as a REIT. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute to our stockholders a minimum of 90.0% of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains. Existing Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, guidance includes a safe harbor pursuant to which publicly offered REITs can satisfy the distribution requirement by distributing a combination of cash and stock to stockholders. In general, to qualify under the safe harbor, each stockholder must elect to receive either cash or stock, and the aggregate cash component of the distribution to stockholders must represent at least 20.0%of the total distribution. In May 2020, the IRS issued similar guidance that lowered the cash component of the distribution to 10.0% for dividends declared between April 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020. As a REIT, weWe generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax ontaxes if we distribute 100% of our taxable income that we distributeeach year to our stockholders.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
If we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT in any taxable year, we will then be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the IRSInternal Revenue Service grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could have a material adverse effect on our net income and net cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
We may be subject to certain state and local income taxes on our income, property or net worth in some jurisdictions, and, in certain circumstances, we may also be subject to federal excise taxes on undistributed income. In addition, certain activities that we undertake are conducted by subsidiaries, which we elected to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRS, to allow us to provide services that would otherwise be considered impermissible for REITs. Also, we have real estate investments in the UK and Isle of Man, which do not accord REIT status to United States REITs under their tax laws. Accordingly, we recognize an income tax benefit or expense for the federal, state and local income taxes incurred by our TRS.TRS and foreign income taxes on our real estate investments in the UK and Isle of Man.
We account for deferred income taxes using the asset and liability method and recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in our financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets reflect the impact of the future deductibility of operating loss carryforwards. A valuation allowance is provided if we believe it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset, is included in income tax benefit or expense in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss when such changes occur. Any increase or decrease in the deferred tax liability that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about expected future tax consequences of events, is recorded in income tax benefit or expense in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
operations and comprehensive loss.Net deferred tax assets are included in other assets, net, or net deferred tax liabilities are included in security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities, in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
See Note 15,16, Income Taxes, for a further discussion.
Segment Disclosure
We segregate our operations into reporting segments in order to assess the performance of our business in the same way that management reviews our performance and makes operating decisions. Accordingly, when we acquired our first medical office building in June 2016; senior housing facility in December 2016; senior housing — RIDEA facility in November 2017; and skilled nursing facility in March 2018, we added a new reportable segment at each such time. As ofDuring the quarter ended December 31, 2020,2023, we havemodified how we evaluate our business and make resource allocations, and therefore determined that we operate through 4four reportable business segments; integrated senior health campuses, OM (which was formerly known as MOBs), triple-net leased properties and SHOP. All segment information included in the notes to the accompanying consolidated financial statements has been recast for all periods presented to reflect four reportable business segments with activities relatedand the change in segment name from MOBs to investingOM. The segment name change from MOBs to OM did not result in medical office buildings, senior housing, senior housing — RIDEAany changes to the composition of such segment or information reviewed by management, and skilled nursing facilities.therefore, had no impact on the historical results of operations.
See Note 17,18, Segment Reporting, for a further discussion.
GLA and Other Measures
GLA and other measures used to describe real estate investments included in our accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented on an unaudited basis.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2020, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2020-04, Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform onof Financial Reporting, orASU 2020-04, which provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contract modifications, and hedging relationships and other transactions, subject to meeting certain criteria,criteria. ASU 2020-04 applies to the aforementioned transactions that reference the London Inter-bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, or another reference rate expected to be discontinued.discontinued because of the reference rate reform. In January 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848), or ASU 2021-01, which clarifies that certain optional expedients and exceptions for contract modification and hedge accounting apply to derivative instruments that use an interest rate for margining,
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
discounting, or contract price alignment that is modified as a result of the discontinuation of the use of LIBOR as a benchmark interest rate due to reference rate reform. In December 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-06, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Deferral of the Sunset Date of Topic 848, or ASU 2022-06, which extends the period of time entities can utilize the reference rate reform relief guidance under ASU 2020-04 isfrom December 31, 2022 to December 31, 2024. ASU 2020-04, ASU 2021-01 and ASU 2022-06 are effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after March 12, 2020 and through the effective date December 31, 2022.2024, as extended by ASU 2022-06. We adopted such accounting pronouncements on January 1, 2023, which has not had a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures as of December 31, 2023.
In July 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-03, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205), Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), Equity (Topic 505), and Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 120, SEC Staff Announcement at the March 24, 2022 EITF Meeting, and Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 6.B, Accounting Series Release 280-General Revision of Regulation S-X: Income or Loss Applicable to Common Stock, or ASU 2023-03. ASU 2023-03 amends the Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, for SEC updates pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 120; SEC Staff Announcement at the March 24, 2022 Emerging Issues Task Force Meeting; and Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 6.B, Accounting Series Release 280 - General Revision of Regulation S-X: Income or Loss Applicable to Common Stock. These updates were immediately effective and did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In August 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-05, Business Combinations — Joint Venture Formations (Subtopic 805- 60): Recognition and Initial Measurement, or ASU 2023-05. ASU 2023-05 applies to the initial formation of a “joint venture” or a “corporate joint venture” as defined in the accounting literature and requires a joint venture to apply a new basis of accounting by initially measuring and recognizing all contributions received upon its formation at fair value. In particular, a joint venture will measure its total assets and liabilities upon formation as the fair value of the joint venture as a whole, which would equal the fair value of all of the joint venture’s outstanding equity interests. The new guidance does not change the definition of a joint venture, the accounting by the investors for their investments in a joint venture (e.g., equity method accounting) or the accounting by a joint venture for contributions received after its formation. ASU 2023-05 will be applied prospectively and is effective for all newly-formed joint venture entities with a formation date on or after January 1, 2025. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2023-05 on January 1, 2025 to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures, or ASU 2023-07, which is intended to improve reportable segment disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant expenses. Such disclosure amendments include the requirement for public entities to disclose significant segment expenses that are regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker and included within each reported measure of segment profit or loss. ASU 2023-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted and should be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. We are currently evaluating this guidance to determine the impact on our disclosures.
In April 2020, the FASB issued a question and answer document, or the Lease Modification Q&A, to provide guidance for the application of lease accounting modifications within ASC Topic 842 to lease concessions granted by lessors related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Lease accounting modification guidance in ASC Topic 842 addresses routine changes or enforceable rights and obligations to lease terms as a result of negotiations between the lessor and the lessee; however, the guidance does not take into consideration concessions granted to address sudden liquidity constraints of lessees arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. The underlying premise of ASC Topic 842 requires a modified lease to be accounted for as a new lease if the modified terms and conditions affect the economics of the lease for the remainder of the lease term. Further, a lease modification resulting from lease concessions would require the application of the modification framework pursuant to ASC Topic 842 on a lease-by-lease basis. The potential large volume of contracts to be assessed due to the COVID-19 pandemic may be burdensome and complex for entities to evaluate the lease modification accounting for each lease. Therefore, the Lease Modification Q&A allows entities to elect to account for lease concessions related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic as if they were granted under the enforceable rights included in the original contract and are outside of the lease modification framework pursuant to ASC Topic 842. Such election is available for lease concessions that do not result in a substantial increase in the rights of the lessor or the obligations of the lessee (e.g., total payments required by the modified contract being substantially the same as or less than total payments required by the original contract) and is to be applied consistently to leases with similar characteristics and circumstances.
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have granted lease concessions to an insignificant number of tenants within our medical office building segment, such as in the form of rent abatements with lease term extensions and rent payment deferrals requiring payment within one year. Such concessions were not material to our consolidated financial statements and as such, we elected notdisclosures.
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to apply the relief from lease modification accounting provided in the Lease Modification Q&A.Income Tax Disclosures, or ASU 2023-09, which includes amendments that further enhance income tax disclosures, primarily through standardization and disaggregation of rate reconciliation categories and income taxes paid by jurisdiction. ASU 2023-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted and should be applied prospectively; however, retrospective application is permitted. We evaluate each lease concession granted as a result of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemicare currently evaluating this guidance to determine whether the concession reflects: (i) a resolution of contractual rights in the original lease and is thus outside of the lease modification framework of ASC Topic 842; or (ii) a modification for which we would be requiredimpact to apply the lease modification framework of ASC Topic 842. The application of the lease modification framework of ASC Topic 842 to lease concessions granted due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.statements and disclosures.
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
In March 2024, the SEC adopted final rules, The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors. The final rules require a registrant to disclose, among other things: material climate-related risks; activities to mitigate or adapt to such risks, as well as a quantitative and qualitative description of material expenditures incurred and material impacts on financial estimates and assumptions that directly result from such mitigation or adaptation activities; material capitalized costs, expenses and losses incurred as a result of severe weather events and other natural conditions; information about the registrant’s board of directors’ oversight of climate-related risks and management’s role in managing material climate-related risks; and information on any climate-related targets or goals that are material to the registrant’s business, results of operations or financial condition. The rules require registrants to provide such climate-related disclosures in their annual reports, beginning with annual reports for the year ending December 31, 2025, for calendar-year-end large accelerated filers. We are currently evaluating this guidance to determine the impact to our consolidated financial statement disclosures.
3. Real Estate Investments, Net
Our real estate investments, net consisted of the following as of December 31, 20202023 and 20192022 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Building and improvements | $ | 884,816,000 | | | $ | 836,091,000 | |
| Land | 109,444,000 | | | 103,371,000 | |
| Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 8,599,000 | | | 6,656,000 | |
| 1,002,859,000 | | | 946,118,000 | |
| Less: accumulated depreciation | (81,279,000) | | | (51,058,000) | |
| Total | $ | 921,580,000 | | | $ | 895,060,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Building, improvements and construction in process | $ | 3,604,299 | | | $ | 3,670,361 | |
| Land and improvements | 335,946 | | | 344,359 | |
| Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 237,350 | | | 221,727 | |
| 4,177,595 | | | 4,236,447 | |
| Less: accumulated depreciation | (752,157) | | | (654,838) | |
| $ | 3,425,438 | | | $ | 3,581,609 | |
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 20182021 was $31,563,000, $27,435,000$147,587,000, $141,257,000 and $16,723,000,$109,036,000, respectively. In addition to the property acquisition transactions discussed below,
The following is a summary of our capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018, we incurred2021 (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Integrated senior health campuses | $ | 64,011 | | | $ | 30,926 | | | $ | 62,596 | |
| OM | 24,296 | | | 32,373 | | | 21,605 | |
| SHOP | 12,244 | | | 9,280 | | | 3,539 | |
| Triple-net leased properties | 420 | | | 4 | | | 31 | |
| Total | $ | 100,971 | | | $ | 72,583 | | | $ | 87,771 | |
Included in the capital expendituresexpenditure amounts above are costs for the development and expansion of $5,556,000, $4,537,000 and $3,643,000, respectively, for our medical office buildings, $1,767,000, $2,505,000 and $5,342,000, respectively, for ourintegrated senior housing — RIDEA facilities, $657,000, $0 and $0, respectively, for our skilled nursing facilities and $0, $75,000 and $0, respectively, for our senior housing facilities.
During 2020, we committed to a plan to sell 2 senior housing facilities within our senior housing – RIDEA reporting segment and commenced actively marketing such assets for sale. We determined that the fair values of such facilities less costs to sell were lower than their carrying values. Therefore, we recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $3,642,000 forhealth campuses. For the year ended December 31, 2020, which reduced2023, we incurred $4,988,000 to expand three of our existing integrated senior health campuses. For the total aggregate carrying value of such assets to $6,415,000. The carrying values of such senior housing — RIDEA facilities were reclassified to properties held for sale, which are included in other assets, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The fair values of such facilities were determined by the sales price from an executed purchase and sales agreement with a third-party buyer, and adjusted for anticipated selling costs, which were considered Level 2 measurements within the fair value hierarchy. We did 0t recognize impairment charges on long-lived assets for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20192022, we exercised our right to purchase a leased property that cost $15,462,000 to develop and 2018.incurred a total of $7,543,000 to expand three of our existing integrated senior health campuses. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we completed the development of three integrated senior health campuses for an aggregate $50,435,000 and incurred a total $22,720,000 to expand two of our existing integrated senior health campuses. We also exercised our right to purchase a leased property that cost $11,004,000.
In June 2020,Acquisitions of Real Estate Investments
2023 Acquisitions of Real Estate Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2023, using cash on hand and debt financing, we, paid an earn-outthrough a majority-owned subsidiary of $1,483,000 in connection with Overland Park MOB, originally purchased in August 2019,Trilogy Investors, LLC, or Trilogy, of which we capitalized and included in real estate investments, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Such amount was paid uponowned 74.1%, completed the condition being met for an existing tenant to lease and occupy additional space. In addition, we paid our advisoracquisition of one integrated senior health campus. The following is a basesummary of such property acquisition fee, as defined in Note 13, Related Party Transactions — Acquisition and Development Stage — Acquisition Fee, of $34,000, or 2.25% of the earn-out amount.
In December 2020, we paid an earn-out of $360,000 in connection with Catalina Madera ALF, originally purchased in January 2020, which we capitalized and included in real estate investments, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Such amount was paid upon the condition being met for achievement of a certain financial metric. In addition, we paid our advisor a base acquisition fee of $8,000, or 2.25% of the earn-out amount.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Location | | Date Acquired | | Contract
Purchase Price | | Mortgage
Loan Payable |
| Louisville, KY | | 02/15/23 | | $ | 11,000 | | | $ | 7,700 | |
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
AcquisitionsIn addition, on June 30, 2023, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, acquired a land parcel in 2020Ohio for a contract purchase price of $660,000, plus closing costs, for the future expansion of an existing integrated senior health campus.
For the year ended December 31, 2020,2023, using cash on hand and debt financing, we, completed the acquisitionthrough a majority-owned subsidiary of 7 buildings from unaffiliated third parties.Trilogy, acquired three previously leased real estate investments located in Indiana and Ohio. The following is a summary of such acquisitions, which are included in our propertyintegrated senior health campuses segment (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Location | | Date Acquired | | Contract
Purchase Price | | Mortgage
Loan Payable | | Financing
Obligation |
| Washington, IN | | 07/13/23 | | $ | 14,200 | | | $ | 12,212 | | | $ | — | |
| Tell City, IN | | 07/13/23 | | 2,400 | | | 1,988 | | | — | |
| New Albany, OH | | 07/13/23 | | 16,283 | | | — | | | 16,283 | |
| Total | | | | $ | 32,883 | | | $ | 14,200 | | | $ | 16,283 | |
We accounted for our acquisitions of land and real estate investments completed during the year ended December 31, 2023 as asset acquisitions. The following table summarizes the purchase price of such assets acquired at the time of acquisition based on their relative fair values and adjusted for $28,623,000 operating lease right-of-use assets and $30,498,000 operating lease liabilities (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2023
Acquisitions |
| Building and improvements | | $ | 38,517 | |
| Land | | 4,917 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Total assets acquired | | $ | 43,434 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
2022 Acquisitions of Real Estate Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2022, using cash on hand and debt financing, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, of which we owned 73.1%, exercised purchase options to acquire four previously leased real estate investments located in Indiana and Kentucky for an aggregate contract purchase price of $54,805,000, which investments are included in our integrated senior health campus segment. We financed such acquisitions with cash on hand and a mortgage loan payable with a principal balance of $52,725,000. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2020:2022, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, acquired land parcels in Indiana and Kentucky for the future development and expansion of our integrated senior health campuses for an aggregate contract purchase price of $1,020,000, plus closing costs.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisition | | Location | | Type | | Date
Acquired | | Contract
Purchase
Price | |
Line of
Credit(1) | | Total
Acquisition
Fee(2) |
| Catalina West Haven ALF(3) | | West Haven, UT | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | 01/01/20 | | $ | 12,799,000 | | | $ | 12,700,000 | | | $ | 278,000 | |
| Louisiana Senior Housing Portfolio(4) | | Gonzales, Monroe, New Iberia, Shreveport and Slidell, LA | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | 01/03/20 | | 34,000,000 | | | 32,700,000 | | | 737,000 | |
| Catalina Madera ALF(3) | | Madera, CA | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | 01/31/20 | | 17,900,000 | | | 17,300,000 | | | 389,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | | | | | | $ | 64,699,000 | | | $ | 62,700,000 | | | $ | 1,404,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2022
Acquisitions |
| Building and improvements | | $ | 49,645 | |
| Land and improvements | | 8,885 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Total assets acquired | | $ | 58,530 | |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
2021 Acquisitions of Real Estate Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2021, using cash on hand and debt financing, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, of which we owned 72.9%, acquired a portfolio of six previously leased real estate investments located in Indiana and Ohio. The following is a summary of such property acquisitions, which are included in our integrated senior health campuses segment (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Location | | Date
Acquired | | Contract
Purchase Price | | | | Mortgage
Loan Payable | | Acquisition
Fee(1) |
| Kendallville, IN; and Delphos, Lima, Springfield, Sylvania and Union Township, OH | | 01/19/21 | | $ | 76,549 | | | | | $ | 78,587 | | | $ | 1,164 | |
___________
(1)Represents a borrowing under the 2018 Credit Facility, as defined in Note 7, Line of Credit and Term Loans, at the time of acquisition.
(2)Our former advisor was paid, as compensation for services rendered in connection with the investigation, selection and acquisition of our properties, a basean acquisition fee of 2.25% of the portion of the contract purchase price paid by us.
(3)On January 1, 2020 and January 31, 2020, we completed the acquisitions of Catalina West Haven ALF and Catalina Madera ALF, respectively, pursuant to a joint venture with an affiliate of Avalon Health Care, Inc., or Avalon, an unaffiliated third party. Our ownership of the joint venture is approximately 90.0%.
(4)On January 3, 2020, we completedproperties attributed to our ownership interest in the acquisition of Louisiana Senior Housing Portfolio pursuant to a joint venture with an affiliate of Senior Solutions Management Group, or SSMG, an unaffiliated third party. Our ownership ofTrilogy subsidiary that acquired the joint venture is approximately 90.0%.properties.
For the year ended December 31, 2020,2021, and prior to the Merger, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, acquired land parcels in Indiana and Ohio for the future development and expansion of our integrated senior health campuses for an aggregate contract purchase price of $1,459,000 plus closing costs. We paid to our former advisor an acquisition fee of 2.25% of the portion of the contract purchase price of each land parcel attributed to our ownership interest. On October 15, 2021, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, acquired a land parcel in Ohio for a contract purchase price of $249,000, plus closing costs.
We accounted for our property acquisitions of land and real estate investments completed during the year ended December 31, 2021 as asset acquisitions. WeFor the year ended December 31, 2021, we incurred and capitalized base acquisition feesclosing costs and direct acquisition related expenses of $2,545,000.$1,855,000. The following table summarizes the purchase price of thesuch assets acquired at the time of acquisition based on their relative fair values:
values and adjusted for $57,647,000 operating lease right-of-use assets and $54,564,000 operating lease liabilities (in thousands): | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 2021
Acquisitions |
| | 2020
Acquisitions | | | | | | | | |
| Building and improvements | | $ | 49,792,00066,167 | | | | | | | | | |
| Land | | 7,632,00017,612 | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
In-place leases | | 8,974,000 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | | 854,000 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Total assets acquired | | $ | 67,252,00083,779 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Acquisitions in 2019Dispositions of Real Estate Investments
2023 Dispositions of Real Estate Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2019, using2023, we disposed of six SHOP and 16 OM buildings. We recognized a total aggregate net proceeds from our initial offering and debt financing, we completed the acquisitiongain on such dispositions of 18 buildings from unaffiliated third parties.$32,717,000. The following is a summary of our property acquisitionssuch dispositions (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Location | | Number of
Buildings | | Type | | Date
Disposed | | Contract
Sales Price |
| Pinellas Park, FL(1) | | 1 | | SHOP | | 02/01/23 | | $ | 7,730 | |
| Olympia Fields, IL | | 1 | | OM | | 04/10/23 | | 3,750 | |
| Auburn, CA | | 1 | | OM | | 04/26/23 | | 7,050 | |
| Pottsville, PA | | 1 | | OM | | 04/26/23 | | 6,000 | |
| New London, CT | | 1 | | OM | | 05/24/23 | | 4,200 | |
| Stratford, CT | | 1 | | OM | | 05/24/23 | | 4,800 | |
| Westbrook, CT | | 1 | | OM | | 05/24/23 | | 7,250 | |
| Lakeland, FL(1) | | 1 | | SHOP | | 06/01/23 | | 7,080 | |
| Winter Haven, FL(1) | | 1 | | SHOP | | 06/01/23 | | 17,500 | |
| Acworth, GA | | 3 | | OM | | 06/14/23 | | 8,775 | |
| Lithonia, GA | | 1 | | OM | | 06/14/23 | | 3,445 | |
| Stockbridge, GA | | 1 | | OM | | 06/14/23 | | 2,430 | |
| Lake Placid, FL(1) | | 1 | | SHOP | | 06/30/23 | | 5,620 | |
| Brooksville, FL(1) | | 1 | | SHOP | | 06/30/23 | | 7,800 | |
| Spring Hill, FL(1) | | 1 | | SHOP | | 08/01/23 | | 7,800 | |
| Morristown, NJ | | 1 | | OM | | 08/09/23 | | 62,210 | |
| Evendale, OH | | 1 | | OM | | 08/29/23 | | 11,900 | |
| Longview, TX | | 1 | | OM | | 09/19/23 | | 1,500 | |
| Naperville, IL | | 2 | | OM | | 10/03/23 | | 17,800 | |
| Total | | 22 | | | | | | $ | 194,640 | |
___________
(1)See Note 12, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests, for information about the ownership of the Central Florida Senior Housing Portfolio.
2022 Dispositions of Real Estate Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2019:2022, we disposed of one OM building in Tennessee and three facilities in Florida within our Central Florida Senior Housing Portfolio. We recognized a total aggregate net gain on such dispositions of $1,370,000. The following is a summary of such dispositions, which were included in our OM and SHOP segments, as applicable (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisition(1) | | Location | | Type | | Date
Acquired | | Contract
Purchase
Price | | Mortgage
Loan
Payable(2) | |
Line of
Credit(3) | | Total
Acquisition
Fee(4) |
| Lithonia MOB | | Lithonia, GA | | Medical Office | | 03/05/19 | | $ | 10,600,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 477,000 | |
| West Des Moines SNF | | West Des Moines, IA | | Skilled Nursing | | 03/24/19 | | 7,000,000 | | | — | | | 0 | | | 315,000 | |
| Great Nord MOB Portfolio | | Tinley Park, IL; Chesterton and Crown Point, IN; and Plymouth, MN | | Medical Office | | 04/08/19 | | 44,000,000 | | | — | | | 15,000,000 | | | 1,011,000 | |
| Michigan ALF Portfolio(5) | | Grand Rapids, MI | | Senior Housing | | 05/01/19 | | 14,000,000 | | | 10,493,000 | | | 3,500,000 | | | 315,000 | |
| Overland Park MOB | | Overland Park, KS | | Medical Office | | 08/05/19 | | 28,350,000 | | | — | | | 28,700,000 | | | 638,000 | |
| Blue Badger MOB | | Marysville, OH | | Medical Office | | 08/09/19 | | 13,650,000 | | | — | | | 12,000,000 | | | 307,000 | |
| Bloomington MOB | | Bloomington, IL | | Medical Office | | 08/13/19 | | 18,200,000 | | | — | | | 17,400,000 | | | 409,000 | |
| Memphis MOB | | Memphis, TN | | Medical Office | | 08/15/19 | | 8,700,000 | | | — | | | 8,600,000 | | | 196,000 | |
| Haverhill MOB | | Haverhill, MA | | Medical Office | | 08/27/19 | | 15,500,000 | | | — | | | 15,450,000 | | | 349,000 | |
| Fresno MOB | | Fresno, CA | | Medical Office | | 10/30/19 | | 10,000,000 | | | — | | | 9,950,000 | | | 225,000 | |
| Colorado Foothills MOB Portfolio | | Arvada, Centennial and Colorado Springs, CO | | Medical Office | | 11/19/19 | | 31,200,000 | | | — | | | 30,500,000 | | | 702,000 | |
| Total | | | | | | | | $ | 201,200,000 | | | $ | 10,493,000 | | | $ | 141,100,000 | | | $ | 4,944,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Location | | Date
Disposed | | Contract
Sales Price |
| Brooksville, FL(1) | | 11/15/22 | | $ | 2,640 | |
| Sanford, FL(1) | | 12/15/22 | | 3,750 | |
| Memphis, TN | | 12/20/22 | | 9,600 | |
| Bradenton FL(1) | | 12/30/22 | | 7,215 | |
| Total | | | | $ | 23,205 | |
___________
(1)We own 100% of our properties acquiredSee Note 12, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests, for information about the year ended December 31, 2019.
(2)Represents the principal balanceownership of the mortgage loan payable assumed by us at the time of acquisition.
(3)Represents a borrowing under the 2018 Credit Facility at the time of acquisition.
(4)Our advisor was paid, as compensation for services rendered in connection with the investigation, selection and acquisition of our properties, a base acquisition fee of 2.25% of the contract purchase price paid by us. In addition, the total acquisition fee may include a Contingent Advisor Payment, as defined in Note 13, Related Party Transactions, up to 2.25% of the contract purchase price paid by us. See Note 13, Related Party Transactions — Acquisition and Development Stage — Acquisition Fee, for a further discussion.
(5)We added 3 buildings to our existing Michigan ALFCentral Florida Senior Housing Portfolio. The other 6 buildings in the Michigan ALF Portfolio were acquired in December 2018.
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
2021 Disposition of Real Estate Investment
In July 2021, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, sold an integrated senior health campus, or the Sold Property, to an unaffiliated third party, or the Buyer, and leased it back, while retaining control of the Sold Property. This transaction did not meet the criteria for a sale and leaseback under GAAP. The lease agreement includes a finance obligation with a present value of $15,504,000 representing our obligation to purchase the Sold Property between 2028 and 2029. Simultaneously, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, purchased a previously leased integrated senior health campus, or the Purchased Property, from the Buyer which was in exchange for the Sold Property. No cash consideration was exchanged as part of the transactions explained above. As of the transaction date, the carrying value of the Purchased Property of $14,807,000 was recorded to real estate investments, net, in our accompanying consolidated balance sheet, and the carrying value of the finance obligation of $15,504,000 was recorded to financing obligations in our accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
Sale of Controlling Interests in Developments
On February 8, 2022, we sold approximately 74.0% of our ownership interests in several real estate development assets within our integrated senior health campuses segment for an aggregate sales price of $19,622,000, and we recognized an aggregate gain on sale of $$683,000 for the year ended December 31, 2022. At the time of sale, we retained approximately 26.0% ownership interests in such real estate development assets. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we own approximately 49.0% and 31.6% ownership interests, respectively, in such real estate development assets, which interests are accounted for as investments in unconsolidated entities within other assets, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2023 and 2022. For the year ended December 31, 2023 and from February 8, 2022 through December 31, 2022, our interests in the net earnings or losses of such unconsolidated entities were included in income or loss from unconsolidated entities in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
See Note 4, Business Combinations, for a discussion of real estate investment acquisitions accounted for business combinations for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.
Impairment of Real Estate Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2023, as we continue to evaluate additional non-strategic properties for sale, we determined that two of our SHOP and one of our OM buildings were impaired and recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $13,899,000, which reduced the total aggregate carrying value of such assets to $20,439,000. The remaining $3,477,000 carrying value of one of the impaired SHOP was reclassified to properties held for sale during the third quarter of 2023, which is included in other assets, net in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The fair value of one SHOP was based on its projected sales price from an independent third party letter of intent, and the fair value of such OM was determined by the sales price from an executed purchase and sale agreement with a third-party buyer, which were considered Level 2 measurements within the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the other SHOP was determined by a third-party appraiser based on the sales comparison approach with the most significant inputs based on a price per unit and price per square foot analysis within the area for similar types of assets. The ranges of these inputs were $190,000 to $200,000 per unit and $250 to $260 per square foot, which were considered Level 3 measurements within the fair value hierarchy.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, we determined that 12 facilities within our SHOP segment were impaired and recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $54,579,000, which reduced the total aggregate carrying value of such facilities to $81,149,000. We disposed of three of such impaired facilities during the fourth quarter of 2022, and disposed of five of such impaired facilities during the year of 2023, as discussed in the “Dispositions of Real Estate Investments” section above. The fair value of one of our impaired facilities was determined by the sales price from an executed purchase and sale agreement with a third-party buyer, which was considered a Level 2 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. The fair values of our remaining 11 impaired facilities were based on their projected sales prices, which were considered Level 2 measurements within the fair value hierarchy.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we determined that one OM building was impaired and recognized an impairment charge of $3,335,000, which reduced the carrying value of such asset to $2,880,000. The fair value of such property was determined by the sales price from an executed purchase and sale agreement with a third-party buyer, and adjusted for anticipated selling costs, which was considered a Level 2 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. We disposed of such impaired OM building in July 2021 for a contract sales price of $3,000,000 and recognized a net gain on sale of $346,000.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
4. Business Combinations
2023 and 2022 Business Combinations
On February 15, 2023, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, acquired from an unaffiliated third party a 60.0% controlling interest in a privately held company, Memory Care Partners, LLC, or MCP, that operated integrated senior health campuses located in Kentucky. The contract purchase price for the acquisition of MCP was $900,000, which was acquired using cash on hand. Prior to such acquisition, we owned a 40.0% interest in MCP, which was accounted for as an equity method investment and was included in investments in unconsolidated entities within other assets, net in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2022. In connection with the acquisition of the remaining interest in MCP, we now own a 100% controlling interest in MCP. As a result, we re-measured the fair value of our previously held equity interest in MCP and recognized a gain on re-measurement of $726,000 in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, we accounted for four acquisitions as business combinations, as discussed below, the first three of which are included within our integrated senior health campuses segment. Based on quantitative and qualitative considerations, such four business combinations were not material to us individually or in the aggregate, and, therefore, pro forma financial information is not provided.
On January 3, 2022, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, acquired an integrated senior health campus in Kentucky from an unaffiliated third party. The contract purchase price for such property acquisition was $27,790,000 plus immaterial transaction costs. We acquired such property using cash on hand and placed a mortgage loan payable of $20,800,000 on the property at the time of acquisition.
On April 1, 2022, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, acquired a 50.0% interest in a pharmaceutical business in Florida from an unaffiliated third party and incurred transaction costs of $938,000. Prior to such pharmaceutical business acquisition, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, owned the other 50.0% interest in such business, which was accounted for as an equity method investment. Therefore, through March 31, 2022, our 50.0% interest in the net earnings or losses of such unconsolidated entity was included in income or loss from unconsolidated entities in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
On August 1, 2022, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, acquired a 50.0% controlling interest in a privately held company, RHS Partners, LLC, or RHS, that owns and/or operates 16 integrated senior health campuses located in Indiana, from an unaffiliated third party. The contract purchase price for the acquisition of RHS was $36,661,000 plus immaterial closing costs, which was primarily acquired using cash on hand. Prior to such acquisition, we owned a 50.0% interest in RHS, which was accounted for as an equity method investment and was included in investments in unconsolidated entities within other assets, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2021. Therefore, through July 31, 2022, our 50.0% equity interest in the net earnings or losses of RHS was included in income or loss from unconsolidated entities in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. In connection with the acquisition of the remaining interest in RHS, we now own a 100% controlling interest in RHS. As a result, we re-measured the fair value of our previously held equity interest in RHS and recognized a gain on re-measurement of $19,567,000 in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
On December 5, 2022, we acquired a portfolio of seven senior housing facilities in Texas from an unaffiliated third party, which facilities are included in our SHOP segment. These facilities are part of the underlying collateral pool of real estate assets securing our debt security investment, as defined and described at Note 5, Debt Security Investment, Net. We acquired the seven facilities by assuming the outstanding principal balance of each related mortgage loan payable from one of the borrowers as such borrower was in default on the required debt payments. The aggregated principal balance of such assumed mortgage loans payable was $110,627,000 at the time of acquisition. No cash consideration was exchanged as part of the transactions; however, we incurred transaction costs of $1,895,000 related to the acquisition of such facilities. See Note 5, Debt Security Investment, Net, for a further discussion.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Based on quantitative and qualitative considerations, such business combinations in 2022 and 2023 were not material to us individually or in the aggregate, and, therefore, pro forma financial information is not provided. The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were preliminary estimates at acquisition. Any necessary adjustments are finalized within one year from the date of acquisition. The table below summarizes the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of our business combinations during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2023
Acquisition | | 2022
Acquisitions |
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | | $ | — | | | $ | 153,777 | |
| Building and improvements | | — | | | 163,166 | |
| Goodwill | | 3,331 | | | 44,990 | |
| Land | | — | | | 20,514 | |
| Accounts receivable, net | | — | | | 19,472 | |
| In-place leases | | — | | | 18,834 | |
| Cash and restricted cash | | 565 | | | 12,331 | |
| Certificates of need | | — | | | 3,567 | |
| Furniture, fixtures and equipment | | 39 | | | 1,936 | |
| Other assets | | 66 | | | 1,798 | |
| Total assets acquired | | 4,001 | | | 440,385 | |
| Operating lease liabilities | | — | | | (161,121) | |
| Mortgage loans payable (including debt discount of $6,066) | | — | | | (149,861) | |
| Security deposits and other liabilities | | (812) | | | (15,994) | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | (1,676) | | | (16,012) | |
| Financing obligations | | (12) | | | (65) | |
| Total liabilities assumed | | (2,500) | | | (343,053) | |
| Net assets acquired | | $ | 1,501 | | | $ | 97,332 | |
2021 Business Combinations — Merger and the AHI Acquisition
As discussed in Note 1, Organization and Description of Business, on October 1, 2021, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated June 23, 2021, we completed the REIT Merger and Partnership Merger. At the effective time of the REIT Merger and prior to the reverse stock split, each issued and outstanding share of GAHR III’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share, converted into the right to receive 0.9266 shares of GAHR IV’s Class I common stock, $0.01 par value per share. At the effective time of the Partnership Merger and prior to the reverse stock split, (i) each unit of limited partnership interest in our operating partnership outstanding as of immediately prior to the effective time of the Partnership Merger was converted automatically into the right to receive 0.9266 of a Partnership Class I Unit, as defined in the agreement of limited partnership, as amended, of the Surviving Partnership and (ii) each unit of limited partnership interest in GAHR IV Operating Partnership outstanding as of immediately prior to the effective time of the Partnership Merger was converted automatically into the right to receive one unit of limited partnership interest of the Surviving Partnership of like class.
Additionally, on October 1, 2021, the AHI Acquisition closed immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger, and pursuant to the Contribution Agreement, AHI contributed substantially all of its business and operations to the Surviving Partnership, including its interest in GAHR III Advisor and GAHR IV Advisor, and Griffin Capital contributed its ownership interest in GAHR III Advisor and GAHR IV Advisor to the Surviving Partnership. In exchange for their contributions, the Surviving Partnership issued limited OP units. The total approximate value of these OP units at the time of consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Contribution Agreement, and prior to the reverse stock split, was approximately $131,674,000, with a reference value for purposes thereof of $8.71 per OP unit, such that the Surviving Partnership issued 15,117,529 OP units as consideration for the transaction. Such OP units were owned by AHI Group Holdings, LLC, or AHI Group Holdings, which is owned and controlled by the AHI Principals, Platform Healthcare Investor T-II, LLC, Flaherty Trust and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Griffin Capital, or collectively, the NewCo Sellers.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Further, upon consummation of the AHI Acquisition, we redeemed all 51 limited partnership units that our former advisor held in our operating partnership, as well as all 52 limited partnership units held by GAHR IV Advisor in GAHR IV Operating Partnership. Also, on October 1, 2021 and in connection with the AHI Acquisition, our operating partnership redeemed all 5,148 shares of our common stock owned by our former advisor and all 5,208 shares of our Class T common stock owned by GAHR IV Advisor in GAHR IV.
The AHI Acquisition was treated as a business combination for accounting purposes, with GAHR III as both the legal and accounting acquiror of NewCo. While GAHR IV was the legal acquiror of GAHR III in the REIT Merger, GAHR III was determined to be the accounting acquiror in the REIT Merger in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, or ASC Topic 805, after considering the relative share ownership and the composition of the governing body of the Combined Company. Thus, the financial information set forth herein subsequent to the consummation of the Merger and the AHI Acquisition reflects results of the Combined Company, and the financial information set forth herein prior to the Merger and the AHI Acquisition reflects GAHR III’s results. For this reason, period-to-period comparisons may not be meaningful.
Purchase Consideration
REIT Merger
The fair value of the purchase consideration transferred was calculated as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | |
| Deemed equity consideration (1) | $ | 768,075 |
| Consideration for acquisition of noncontrolling interest (2) | (53,300) |
| Repurchase of GAHR IV Class T common stock | 192 |
| Total purchase consideration | $ | 714,967 |
________________(1)Represents the fair value of GAHR III common stock that is deemed to be issued for accounting purposes only. Taking into consideration the impact of the reverse stock split, the fair value of the purchase consideration is calculated based on 22,045,766 shares of common stock deemed to be issued by GAHR III at the fair value per share of $34.84.
(2)Represents the fair value of additional interest acquired in GAHR III’s subsidiary, Trilogy REIT Holdings, LLC, or Trilogy REIT Holdings. The acquisition of additional interest in Trilogy is accounted for separately from the REIT Merger in accordance with ASC Topic 810, Consolidation, or ASC Topic 810. See Note 13, Equity — Noncontrolling Interests in Total Equity, for a discussion of the Trilogy transaction.
AHI Acquisition
The fair value of the purchase consideration transferred was calculated as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | |
| Equity consideration (1) | $ | 131,674 |
| Post-closing cash payment to NewCo Sellers related to net working capital adjustments | 73 |
| Contingent consideration (2) | — |
| Total purchase consideration | $ | 131,747 |
________________(1)Taking into consideration the impact of the reverse stock split, the amount represents the estimated fair value of the 3,779,382 Surviving Partnership OP units issued as consideration, with a reference value for purposes thereof of $34.84 per unit. The issuance of Surviving Partnership OP units was accounted for separately from the AHI Acquisition.
(2)Represents the estimated fair value of contingent consideration based on the performance of a possible private investment fund under consideration by AHI. We have no definitive plans to establish the investment fund, and, therefore, the fair value of contingent consideration was estimated to be $0.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Purchase Price Allocation
REIT Merger
The following table sets forth the allocation of the purchase consideration to the fair values of identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at the acquisition date of GAHR IV, as well as the fair value at the acquisition date of the noncontrolling interests in GAHR IV (in thousands):
| | | | | |
| Real estate investments | $ | 1,126,641 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 16,163 |
| Accounts and other receivables, net | 2,086 |
| Restricted cash | 986 |
| Identified intangible assets | 115,824 |
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | 11,939 |
| Other assets | 3,938 |
| Total assets | 1,277,577 |
| |
| Mortgage loans payable (including debt premium of $311) | (18,602) |
| Lines of credit and term loans | (488,900) |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (21,882) |
| Accounts payable due to affiliates | (324) |
| Identified intangible liabilities | (12,927) |
| Operating lease liabilities | (7,568) |
| Security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities | (8,354) |
| Total liabilities | (558,557) |
| |
| Net identifiable assets acquired | 719,020 |
| |
| Redeemable noncontrolling interests | (2,525) |
| |
| Noncontrolling interest in total equity | (1,528) |
| |
| Total purchase consideration | $ | 714,967 |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
AHI Acquisition
The following table sets forth the allocation of the purchase consideration to the fair values of identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at the acquisition date (in thousands):
| | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 706 |
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | 3,526 |
| |
| Other assets | 362 |
| Total assets | 4,594 |
| |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (3,910) |
| Operating lease liabilities | (3,526) |
| Total liabilities | (7,436) |
| |
| Net identifiable liabilities assumed | (2,842) |
| Goodwill | 134,589 |
| Total purchase consideration | $ | 131,747 |
Acquisition-related Costs
The Merger and the AHI Acquisition were accounted for as business combinations, and as a result, acquisition-related costs incurred in connection with these transactions of $14,060,000 were expensed and included in business acquisition expenses in our accompanying consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. Acquisition-related costs of $6,753,000 were incurred by GAHR IV in the period before the consummation of the Merger and are therefore not reflected in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2021 as GAHR III was the accounting acquiror in the Merger under ASC Topic 805, as further explained above.
Fair Value of Noncontrolling Interests
The fair value of the redeemable and nonredeemable noncontrolling interest in GAHR IV was estimated by applying the income approach based on a discounted cash flow analysis. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market. The key assumptions applied in the income approach include the estimates of stabilized occupancy, market rents, capitalization rates and discount rates.
AHI Acquisition — Goodwill
In connection with the AHI Acquisition, we recorded goodwill of $134,589,000 as a result of the consideration exceeding the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill represents the estimated future benefits arising from other assets acquired that could not be individually identified and separately recognized. Goodwill recognized in this transaction is not deductible for tax purposes. See Note 18, Segment Reporting, for a further discussion.
The table below represents the allocation of goodwill on the acquisition date in connection with the AHI Acquisition to our reporting segments (in thousands):
| | | | | |
| OM | $ | 47,812 |
| Integrated senior health campuses | 44,547 |
| SHOP | 23,277 |
| Triple-net leased properties: | |
| Senior housing | 8,640 |
| Hospitals | 5,924 |
| SNFs | 4,389 |
| Total | $ | 134,589 | |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
REIT Merger — Real Estate Investments, Intangible Assets and Intangible Liabilities
Real estate investments consist of land, building improvements, site improvements, unamortized tenant improvement allowances and unamortized capital improvements. Intangibles assets consist of in-place leases, above-market leases and certificates of need. We amortize purchased real estate investments and intangible assets on a straight-line basis over their respective useful lives. The following tables present the approximate fair value and the weighted-average depreciation and amortization periods of each major type of asset and liability (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Real Estate Investments | | Approximate
Fair Value | | Estimated Useful Lives (in years) |
| Land | | $ | 114,525 | | N/A |
| Building improvements | | 930,700 | | 39 |
| Site improvements | | 33,644 | | 7 |
| Unamortized tenant improvement allowances | | 42,407 | | 6 |
| Unamortized capital improvements | | 5,365 | | 11 |
| Total real estate investments | | $ | 1,126,641 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Intangible Assets | | Approximate
Fair Value | | Estimated Useful Lives (in years) |
| In-place leases | | $ | 79,887 | | 6 |
| Above-market leases | | 35,606 | | 10 |
| Certificates of need | | 331 | | N/A |
| Total identified intangible assets | | $ | 115,824 | | |
| | | | |
| Intangible Liabilities | | Approximate
Fair Value | | Estimated
Useful Life
(in years) |
| Below-market leases | | $ | 12,927 | | 10 |
The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as the fair value of the noncontrolling interests, on October 1, 2021 were estimates determined using the cost approach and direct capitalization method under the income approach and in limited circumstances, the market approach. Any necessary adjustments were finalized within one year from the date of acquisition.
Pro Forma Financial Information (Unaudited)
The following unaudited pro forma operating information is presented as if the Merger and the AHI Acquisition occurred on January 1, 2020. Such unaudited pro forma information includes a nonrecurring adjustment to present acquisition-related expenses incurred in the year ended December 31, 2021 in the 2020 pro forma results. The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have been obtained had the Merger and the AHI Acquisition occurred at the beginning of the periods presented, nor are they necessarily indicative of future operating results. Unaudited pro forma revenue, net loss and net loss attributable to controlling interest would have been as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 |
| Revenue | $ | 1,392,884 | | $ | 1,397,261 |
| Net loss | $ | (45,253) | | $ | (17,116) |
| Net loss attributable to controlling interest | $ | (35,140) | | $ | (20,642) |
| | | |
5. Debt Security Investment, Net
Our investment in a commercial mortgage-backed debt security, or debt security, bears an interest rate on the stated principal amount thereof equal to 4.24% per annum, the terms of which security provide for monthly interest-only payments. The debt security has underlying tranches that mature between August 25, 2025 and January 1, 2028 at an aggregate stated
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
amount of $93,433,000, resulting in an anticipated yield-to-maturity of 10.0% per annum. The debt security was issued by an unaffiliated mortgage trust and represents a 10.0% beneficial ownership interest in such mortgage trust. The debt security is subordinate to all other interests in the mortgage trust and is not guaranteed by a government-sponsored entity.
On December 5, 2022, we acquired a portfolio of seven senior housing facilities in Texas from an unaffiliated third party, which facilities are included in the underlying collateral pool securing our debt security investment. We acquired the seven facilities by assuming the outstanding principal balance of each related mortgage loan payable from one of the borrowers as such borrower was in default on the required debt payments. We did not grant any concessions to such borrowers, and the carrying value of our debt security investment at the time of acquisition did not exceed the fair value of such facilities. See Note 4, Business Combinations — 2022 and 2023 Business Combinations, for a further discussion of such acquisitions.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the carrying amount of the debt security investment was $86,935,000 and $83,000,000, respectively, net of unamortized closing costs of $489,000 and $767,000, respectively. Accretion on the debt security for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021was $4,213,000, $3,922,000 and $3,665,000, respectively, which is recorded as an increase to real estate revenue in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Amortization expense of closing costs for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 was $278,000, $237,000 and $201,000, respectively, which is recorded as a decrease to real estate revenue in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. We evaluated credit quality indicators such as the agency ratings and the underlying collateral of such investment in order to determine expected future credit loss. No credit loss was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.
6. Identified Intangible Assets and Liabilities
Identified intangible assets, net and identified intangible liabilities, net consisted of the following as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 (dollars in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 |
| Amortized intangible assets: | | | |
| In-place leases, net of accumulated amortization of $35,437 and $38,930 as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 7.7 years and 7.0 years as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively) | $ | 42,615 | | | $ | 75,580 | |
| Above-market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $7,079 and $6,360 as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 7.5 years and 9.0 years as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively) | 15,905 | | | 30,194 | |
| Customer relationships, net of accumulated amortization of $934 and $785 as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 12.7 years and 13.7 years as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively) | 1,906 | | | 2,055 | |
| Unamortized intangible assets: | | | |
| Certificates of need | 99,777 | | | 97,667 | |
| Trade names | 20,267 | | | 30,787 | |
| Total identified intangible assets, net | $ | 180,470 | | | $ | 236,283 | |
| | | |
| Amortized intangible liabilities: | | | |
| Below-market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $2,831 and $2,508 as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 7.2 years and 8.4 years as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively) | $ | 6,095 | | | $ | 10,837 | |
| Total identified intangible liabilities, net | $ | 6,095 | | | $ | 10,837 | |
Amortization expense on identified intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 was $46,601,000, $28,378,000 and $22,460,000, respectively, which included $14,278,000, $4,444,000 and $1,349,000, respectively, of amortization recorded as a decrease to real estate revenue for above-market leases in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. In March 2023, we transitioned our SNFs within Central Wisconsin Senior Care Portfolio from triple-net leased properties to a RIDEA structure, which resulted in a full amortization of $8,073,000 of above-market leases and $885,000 of in-place leases. In addition, we fully amortized $2,756,000 of above-market leases and $5,750,000 of in-place leases in connection with the transition of our senior housing facilities within Michigan ALF Portfolio from triple-net leased properties to a RIDEA structure in November 2023.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
For the year ended December 31, 2019,2023, we accounted for our property acquisitions completed as asset acquisitions. We incurred and capitalized base acquisition fees and direct acquisitionrecognized an impairment loss of approximately $10,520,000 related expensesto the write-off of $6,461,000. In addition, we incurred Contingent Advisor Payments of $418,000 to our advisor for certain property acquisitions. The following table summarizes the purchase price of thetrade name intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the time of acquisition based on their relative fair values:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019
Acquisitions | | | | | | | | |
Building and improvements | | $ | 164,084,000 | | | | | | | | | |
Land | | 20,286,000 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
In-place leases | | 21,393,000 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Above-market leases | | 2,578,000 | | | | | | | | | |
Right-of-use asset | | 3,133,000 | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets acquired | | 211,474,000 | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage loan payable (including debt discount of $758,000) | | (9,735,000) | | | | | | | | | |
Below-market leases | | (874,000) | | | | | | | | | |
Operating lease liability | | (4,489,000) | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities assumed | | (15,098,000) | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets acquired | | $ | 196,376,000 | | | | | | | | | |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Acquisitions in 2018
ancillary business units within Trilogy. For the yearyears ended December 31, 2018, using net proceeds from our initial offering2022 and debt financing,2021, we completed the acquisition of 29 buildings from unaffiliated third parties. The following is a summary of our property acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2018:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisition(1) | | Location | | Type | | Date
Acquired | | Contract
Purchase
Price | | | | | | Mortgage
Loan
Payable(2) | |
Line of
Credit(3) | | Total
Acquisition
Fee(4) |
| Central Wisconsin Senior Care Portfolio | | Sun Prairie and Waunakee, WI | | Skilled Nursing | | 03/01/18 | | $ | 22,600,000 | | | | | | | $ | — | | | $ | 22,600,000 | | | $ | 1,018,000 | |
| Sauk Prairie MOB | | Prairie du Sac, WI | | Medical Office | | 04/09/18 | | 19,500,000 | | | | | | | — | | | 19,500,000 | | | 878,000 | |
| Surprise MOB | | Surprise, AZ | | Medical Office | | 04/27/18 | | 11,650,000 | | | | | | | — | | | 8,000,000 | | | 524,000 | |
| Southfield MOB | | Southfield, MI | | Medical Office | | 05/11/18 | | 16,200,000 | | | | | | | 6,071,000 | | | 10,000,000 | | | 728,000 | |
| Pinnacle Beaumont ALF(5) | | Beaumont, TX | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | 07/01/18 | | 19,500,000 | | | | | | | — | | | 19,400,000 | | | 868,000 | |
| Grand Junction MOB | | Grand Junction, CO | | Medical Office | | 07/06/18 | | 31,500,000 | | | | | | | — | | | 31,400,000 | | | 1,418,000 | |
| Edmonds MOB | | Edmonds, WA | | Medical Office | | 07/30/18 | | 23,500,000 | | | | | | | — | | | 22,000,000 | | | 1,058,000 | |
| Pinnacle Warrenton ALF(5) | | Warrenton, MO | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | 08/01/18 | | 8,100,000 | | | | | | | — | | | 8,100,000 | | | 360,000 | |
| Glendale MOB | | Glendale, WI | | Medical Office | | 08/13/18 | | 7,600,000 | | | | | | | — | | | 7,000,000 | | | 342,000 | |
| Missouri SNF Portfolio | | Florissant, Kansas City, Milan, Moberly, Salisbury, Sedalia, St. Elizabeth and Trenton, MO | | Skilled Nursing | | 09/28/18 | | 88,200,000 | | | | | | | — | | | 87,000,000 | | | 3,970,000 | |
| Flemington MOB Portfolio | | Flemington, NJ | | Medical Office | | 11/29/18 | | 16,950,000 | | | | | | | — | | | 15,500,000 | | | 763,000 | |
| Lawrenceville MOB II | | Lawrenceville, GA | | Medical Office | | 12/19/18 | | 9,999,000 | | | | | | | — | | | 10,100,000 | | | 450,000 | |
| Mill Creek MOB | | Mill Creek, WA | | Medical Office | | 12/21/18 | | 8,250,000 | | | | | | | — | | | 6,200,000 | | | 371,000 | |
| Modesto MOB | | Modesto, CA | | Medical Office | | 12/28/18 | | 16,000,000 | | | | | | | — | | | 15,400,000 | | | 720,000 | |
| Michigan ALF Portfolio | | Grand Rapids, Holland, Howell, Lansing and Wyoming, MI | | Senior Housing | | 12/28/18 | | 56,000,000 | | | | | | | — | | | 53,400,000 | | | 2,520,000 | |
| Total | | | | | | | | $ | 355,549,000 | | | | | | | $ | 6,071,000 | | | $ | 335,600,000 | | | $ | 15,988,000 | |
___________
(1)We own 100% of our properties acquired in 2018,did not recognize any impairment losses with the exception of Pinnacle Beaumont ALF and Pinnacle Warrenton ALF.
(2)Represents the principal balance of the mortgage loan payable assumed by us at the time of acquisition.
(3)Represents a borrowing under the 2016 Credit Facility or 2018 Credit Facility, as defined in Note 7, Line of Credit and Term Loans, at the time of acquisition.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(4)Our advisor was paid, as compensation for services rendered in connection with the investigation, selection and acquisition of our properties, a base acquisition fee of 2.25% of the portion of the aggregate contract purchase price paid by us. In addition, the total acquisition fee includes a Contingent Advisor Payment.
(5)On July 1, 2018 and August 1, 2018, we completed the acquisitions of Pinnacle Beaumont ALF and Pinnacle Warrenton ALF, respectively, pursuantrespect to a joint venture with an affiliate of Meridian Senior Living, LLC, or Meridian, an unaffiliated third party. Our ownership of the joint venture is approximately 98.0%.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, we accounted for our property acquisitions completed as asset acquisitions. We incurred and capitalized base acquisition fees and direct acquisition related expenses of $13,021,000. In addition, we incurred Contingent Advisor Payments of $7,994,000 to our advisor for such property acquisitions. The following table summarizes the purchase price of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the time of acquisition based on their relative fair values:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2018
Acquisitions | | | | | | | | |
Building and improvements | | $ | 289,830,000 | | | | | | | | | |
Land | | 30,878,000 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | | 79,000 | | | | | | | | | |
In-place leases | | 45,439,000 | | | | | | | | | |
Certificates of need | | 348,000 | | | | | | | | | |
Leasehold interests | | 93,000 | | | | | | | | | |
Above-market leases | | 200,000 | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets acquired | | 366,867,000 | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage loan payable (including debt discount of $263,000) | | (5,808,000) | | | | | | | | | |
Below-market leases | | (269,000) | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities assumed | | (6,077,000) | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets acquired | | $ | 360,790,000 | | | | | | | | | |
4. Identified Intangible Assets, Net
Identifiedtrade name intangible assets, net consisted of the following as of December 31, 2020 and 2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
| Amortized intangible assets: | | | |
| In-place leases, net of accumulated amortization of $32,134,000 and $18,273,000 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 8.8 years and 9.5 years as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively) | $ | 61,166,000 | | | $ | 70,650,000 | |
| Above-market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $1,009,000 and $609,000 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 9.1 years and 9.5 years as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively) | 2,587,000 | | | 3,025,000 | |
| Unamortized intangible assets: | | | |
| Certificates of need | 348,000 | | | 348,000 | |
| Total | $ | 64,101,000 | | | $ | 74,023,000 | |
Amortization expense on identified intangible assetsbelow-market leases for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 20182021 was $18,897,000, $18,384,000$4,534,000, $1,848,000 and $16,180,000,$396,000, respectively, which included $438,000, $310,000 and $208,000, respectively, of amortizationis recorded againstas an increase to real estate revenue for above-market leases in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The aggregate weighted average remaining life of the identified intangible assets was 8.87.8 years and 9.57.7 years as of December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, respectively. The aggregate weighted average remaining life of the identified intangible liabilities was 7.2 years and 8.4 years as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. As of December 31, 2020,2023, estimated amortization expense on the identified intangible assets and liabilities for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter was as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| Year | | Amount |
| 2021 | | $ | 11,920,000 | |
| 2022 | | 8,648,000 | |
| 2023 | | 7,384,000 | |
| 2024 | | 6,155,000 | |
| 2025 | | 4,977,000 | |
| Thereafter | | 24,669,000 | |
| Total | | $ | 63,753,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amortization Expense |
| Year | | Intangible
Assets | | Intangible
Liabilities |
| 2024 | | $ | 11,618 | | | $ | (1,073) | |
| 2025 | | 8,797 | | | (956) | |
| 2026 | | 7,729 | | | (840) | |
| 2027 | | 7,205 | | | (825) | |
| 2028 | | 6,152 | | | (709) | |
| Thereafter | | 18,925 | | | (1,692) | |
| Total | | $ | 60,426 | | | $ | (6,095) | |
5.7. Other Assets, Net
Other assets, net consisted of the following as of December 31, 20202023 and 2019:2022 (dollars in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Deferred rent receivables | $ | 47,540 | | | $ | 46,867 | |
| Prepaid expenses, deposits, other assets and deferred tax assets, net | 33,204 | | | 25,866 | |
| Investments in unconsolidated entities | 20,611 | | | 9,580 | |
| Inventory — finished goods | 19,472 | | | 19,775 | |
| | | |
| Lease commissions, net of accumulated amortization of $7,231 and $6,260 as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively | 17,565 | | | 19,217 | |
| Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $8,494 and $5,704 as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively | 3,830 | | | 4,334 | |
| Lease inducement, net of accumulated amortization of $2,544 and $2,193 as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 6.9 years and 7.9 years as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively) | 2,456 | | | 2,807 | |
| Derivative financial instrument | 1,463 | | | — | |
| Total | $ | 146,141 | | | $ | 128,446 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Investment in unconsolidated entity | $ | 46,653,000 | | | $ | 47,016,000 | |
| Deferred rent receivables | 12,395,000 | | | 8,018,000 | |
| Prepaid expenses, deposits and other assets | 9,028,000 | | | 2,380,000 | |
| Lease commissions, net of accumulated amortization of $426,000 and $174,000 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively | 2,399,000 | | | 1,623,000 | |
| Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $3,397,000 and $1,517,000 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively(1) | 1,724,000 | | | 3,583,000 | |
| Total | $ | 72,199,000 | | | $ | 62,620,000 | |
___________
(1)Deferred financing costs only include costsincluded in other assets, net were related to our linethe 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility, as defined in Note 9, and the senior unsecured revolving credit facility portion of creditthe 2022 Credit Facility. See Note 9, Lines of Credit and term loans.Term Loan, for a further discussion. Amortization expense on deferred financing costslease inducement for each of our line of credit and term loans for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 20182021 was $1,880,000, $2,028,000$351,000 and $1,000,000, respectively, which is recorded as a decrease to interest expensereal estate revenue in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations. See Note 7, Line of Creditoperations and Term Loans, for a further discussion.
Investmentcomprehensive loss. For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, we did not incur any impairment losses with respect to our investments in unconsolidated entity represents our purchase of 6.0% of the total membership interests of Trilogy REIT Holdings, LLC, or the Trilogy Joint Venture, from unaffiliated third parties on October 1, 2018 for $48,000,000 in cash, based on an estimated gross enterprise value of $93,154,000 consisting of our equity investment and a calculated share of the debt of the Trilogy Joint Venture based on our ownership interest. The Trilogy Joint Venture, through an approximately 96.7% owned subsidiary, owns and operates purpose-built integrated senior health campuses, including skilled nursing facilities and assisted living facilities, located across several states, as well as certain ancillary businesses. In addition to our membership interests, the Trilogy Joint Venture is 70.0% indirectly owned by Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc., or GAHR III, and the remaining 24.0% is indirectly owned by NorthStar Healthcare Income, Inc. GAHR III, through a wholly owned subsidiary, serves as the manager of the Trilogy Joint Venture and both GAHR III and us are sponsored by American Healthcare Investors. In connection with the purchase of the Trilogy Joint Venture membership interests, we paid to our advisor a base acquisition fee of approximately $2,096,000, or 2.25% of the estimated gross enterprise value of the Trilogy Joint Venture membership interests acquired by us. Additionally, we paid a Contingent Advisor Payment of approximately $2,096,000, or 2.25% of the estimated gross enterprise value of the Trilogy Joint Venture membership interests acquired by us.
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the unamortized basis difference of our joint venture investment in an unconsolidated entity of $16,791,000 and $17,248,000, respectively, is primarily attributable to the difference between the amount for which we purchased our interest in the entity, including transaction costs, and the historical carrying value of the net assets of the entity. This difference is being amortized over the remaining useful life of the related assets and included in income or loss from unconsolidated entity in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.entities.
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
6.8. Mortgage Loans Payable, Net
AsMortgage loans payable, net consisted of the following as of December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022 (dollars in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 |
| Total fixed-rate debt (76 loans and 68 loans as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively) | $ | 990,325 | | | $ | 885,892 | |
| Total variable-rate debt (13 loans and 11 loans as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively) | 335,988 | | | 368,587 | |
| Total fixed- and variable-rate debt | 1,326,313 | | | 1,254,479 | |
| Less: deferred financing costs, net | (9,713) | | | (8,845) | |
| Add: premium | 167 | | | 237 | |
| Less: discount | (14,371) | | | (16,024) | |
| Mortgage loans payable, net | $ | 1,302,396 | | | $ | 1,229,847 | |
Based on interest rates in effect as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, effective interest rates on mortgage loans payable were $18,766,000 ($17,827,000, net of discount/premium and deferred financing costs) and $27,099,000 ($26,070,000, net of discount/premium and deferred financing costs), respectively. As of December 31, 2020, we had 3 fixed-rate mortgage loans with interest rates rangingranged from 3.67%2.21% to 5.25%8.46% per annum maturity dates ranging from April 1, 2025and 2.21% to February 1, 2051 and7.26% per annum, respectively, with a weighted average effective interest rate of 3.93%. As4.72% and 5.29%, respectively. We are required by the terms of December 31, 2019, we had 4 fixed-rate mortgage loans with interest rates ranging from 3.67%certain loan documents to 5.25% per annum, maturity dates ranging from April 1, 2020 to February 1, 2051meet certain reporting requirements and a weighted average effective interest rate of 4.18%.covenants, such as net worth ratios, fixed charge coverage ratios and leverage ratios.
In January 2020, we paid off a mortgage loan payable with a principal balance of $7,738,000, which had an original maturity date of April 1, 2020. We did not incur any prepayment penalties or fees in connection with such payoff. The following table reflects the changes in the carrying amount of mortgage loans payable, net for the years ended December 31, 20202023 and 2019:2022 (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 |
| Beginning balance | $ | 1,229,847 | | | $ | 1,095,594 | |
| Additions: | | | |
| Borrowings under mortgage loans payable | 160,442 | | | 186,227 | |
| Assumption of mortgage loans payable, net | 10,884 | | | 149,861 | |
| Amortization of deferred financing costs | 2,284 | | | 2,332 | |
| Amortization of discount/premium on mortgage loans payable, net | 3,549 | | | 2,242 | |
| Deductions: | | | |
| Scheduled principal payments on mortgage loans payable | (64,792) | | | (104,384) | |
| Early payoff of mortgage loans payable | (9,809) | | | (90,871) | |
| Payoff of a mortgage loans payable due to disposition of real estate investments | (26,856) | | | (8,637) | |
| Deferred financing costs | (3,153) | | | (2,517) | |
| Ending balance | $ | 1,302,396 | | | $ | 1,229,847 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
| Beginning balance | $ | 26,070,000 | | | $ | 16,892,000 | |
| Additions: | | | |
| Assumption of mortgage loan payable, net | 0 | | | 9,735,000 | |
| Amortization of deferred financing costs | 40,000 | | | 78,000 | |
| Amortization of discount/premium on mortgage loans payable | 49,000 | | | 41,000 | |
| Deductions: | | | |
| Scheduled principal payments on mortgage loans payable | (8,332,000) | | | (650,000) | |
| Deferred financing costs | 0 | | | (26,000) | |
| Ending balance | $ | 17,827,000 | | | $ | 26,070,000 | |
For the year ended December 31, 2022, we incurred an aggregate loss on the early extinguishment of mortgage loans payable of $2,005,000. Such aggregate loss was primarily related to the payoff of a mortgage loan payable due to the disposition of a real estate investment in September 2022, the payoff of a construction loan in December 2022 and the write-off of unamortized loan discount related to eight mortgage loans payable that we refinanced on January 1, 2022 that were due to mature in 2044 through 2052.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we incurred an aggregate loss on the extinguishment of mortgage loans payable of $2,425,000. Such loss was primarily related to the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs of 10 mortgage loans payable that we refinanced on January 29, 2021 and one mortgage loan payable that we refinanced on December 1, 2021 that were due to mature in 2053 and 2049, respectively.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
As of December 31, 2020,2023, the principal payments due on our mortgage loans payable for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| Year | | Amount |
| 2021 | | $ | 607,000 | |
| 2022 | | 651,000 | |
| 2023 | | 680,000 | |
| 2024 | | 711,000 | |
| 2025 | | 5,878,000 | |
| Thereafter | | 10,239,000 | |
| Total | | $ | 18,766,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Year | | Amount |
| 2024 | | $ | 311,445 | |
| 2025 | | 166,853 | |
| 2026 | | 171,432 | |
| 2027 | | 50,175 | |
| 2028 | | 16,421 | |
| Thereafter | | 609,987 | |
| Total | | $ | 1,326,313 | |
7. Line9. Lines of Credit and Term LoansLoan
20162022 Credit Facility
On August 25, 2016, January 19, 2022, we, through our operating partnership, as borrower, and certain of our subsidiaries, or the subsidiary guarantors, and us, collectively as guarantors, entered into a creditan agreement, or the 20162022 Credit Agreement, to amend and restate the credit agreement for our existing credit facility with Bank of America, N.A., or Bank of America, as administrative agent, swing line lender and letters of credit issuer; and KeyBank National Association, or KeyBank, as syndication agentCitizens Bank, National Association, and letters ofthe lenders named therein. The 2022 Credit Agreement provided for a credit issuer, to obtain a revolving line of creditfacility with an aggregate maximum principal amount of $100,000,000,up to $1,050,000,000, or the 2016 Line of Credit, subject to certain terms and conditions. The 2016 Line of Credit would have matured on August 25, 2019.
On each of October 31, 2017 and September 28, 2018, we amended the 2016 Credit Agreement. The material terms of such amendments provided for increases in both the revolving line of credit and term loan commitments, which resulted in an aggregate borrowing capacity under the 2016 Line of Credit of $350,000,000. On November 20, 2018, we, through our operating partnership, terminated the 2016 Credit Agreement, as amended, and entered into the 2018 Credit Agreement as described below. We currently do not have any obligations under the 2016 Credit Agreement, as amended.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
2018 Credit Facility
On November 20, 2018, we, through our operating partnership as borrower, and certain of our subsidiaries, or the subsidiary guarantors, and us, collectively as guarantors, entered into a credit agreement, or the 2018 Credit Agreement, with Bank of America, as administrative agent, swing line lender and letters of credit issuer; KeyBank, as syndication agent and letters of credit issuer; Citizens Bank, National Association, as syndication agent, joint lead arranger and joint bookrunner; Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as joint lead arranger and joint bookrunner; KeyBanc Capital Markets, as joint lead arranger and joint bookrunner; and the lenders named therein, to obtain a credit facility with an initial aggregate maximum principal amount of $400,000,000, or the 2018 Credit Facility. The 20182022 Credit Facility, initiallywhich consisted of a senior unsecured revolving credit facility in the initial aggregate amount of $150,000,000$500,000,000 and a senior unsecured term loan facilitiesfacility in the initial aggregate amount of $250,000,000. $550,000,000. The proceeds of loans made under the 2022 Credit Facility could have been used for refinancing existing indebtedness and for general corporate purposes including for working capital, capital expenditures and other corporate purposes not inconsistent with obligations under the 2022 Credit Agreement. We may obtaincould have also obtained up to $20,000,000$25,000,000 in the form of standby letters of credit and uppursuant to $50,000,000the 2022 Credit Facility. Unless defined herein, all capitalized terms under this “2022 Credit Facility” subsection are defined in the form of swing line loans. On November 1, 2019, we entered into an amendment to the 20182022 Credit Agreement, or the 2019 Amendment, with Bank of America, KeyBank and a syndicate of other banks, as lenders, which increased the term loan commitment by $45,000,000 and increased the revolving credit facility by $85,000,000. As a result of the 2019 Amendment, the aggregate borrowing capacity under the 2018 Credit Facility was $530,000,000. Except as modified by the 2019 Amendment, the material terms of the 2018 Credit Agreement, as amended, remain in full force and effect.Agreement.
The maximum principal amount of the 2018 Credit Facility may be increased by up to $120,000,000, for a total principal amount of $650,000,000, subject to: (i)Under the terms of the 20182022 Credit Agreement, as amended;the revolving loans matured on January 19, 2026, and (ii) at least five business days prior written notice to Bank of America. The 2018 Credit Facility matures on November 19, 2021 and may becould have been extended for 1one 12-month period, during the term of the 2018 Credit Agreement, as amended, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including payment of an extension fee. The term loan would have matured on January 19, 2027, and could not be extended. The maximum principal amount of the 2022 Credit Facility could have been increased by an aggregate incremental amount of $700,000,000, subject to: (i) the terms of the 2022 Credit Agreement; and (ii) at least five business days’ prior written notice to Bank of America.
AtThe 2022 Credit Facility bore interest at varying rates based upon, at our option, (i) Daily SOFR, plus the 2018Applicable Rate for Daily SOFR Rate Loans or (ii) the Term SOFR, plus the Applicable Rate for Term SOFR Rate Loans. If, under the terms of the 2022 Credit Agreement, there was an inability to determine the Daily SOFR or the Term SOFR then the 2022 Credit Facility bearsbore interest at a rate per annum rates equal to (a)(i) the Eurodollar Rate, as defined in the 2018 Credit Agreement, as amended, plus (ii) a margin ranging from 1.70% to 2.20% based on our Consolidated Leverage Ratio, as defined in the 2018 Credit Agreement, as amended, or (b)(i) the greater of: (1) the prime rate publicly announced by Bank of America, (2) the Federal Funds Rate, as defined in the 2018 Credit Agreement, as amended, plus 0.50%, (3) the one-month EurodollarBase Rate plus 1.00%, and (4) 0.00%, plus (ii) a margin ranging from 0.70% to 1.20% based on our Consolidated Leverage Ratio. Accrued interest on the 2018 Credit Facility is payable monthly.Applicable Rate for Base Rate Loans. The loans may becould have been repaid in whole or in part without prepayment premium or penalty, subject to certain conditions.
We areThe 2022 Credit Agreement required us to pay a fee onadd additional subsidiaries as guarantors in the unused portionevent the value of the lenders’ commitmentsassets owned by the subsidiary guarantors fell below a certain threshold as set forth in the 2022 Credit Agreement. In the event of default, Bank of America had the right to terminate the commitment of each Lender to make Loans and any obligation of the L/C Issuer to make L/C Credit Extensions under the 20182022 Credit Agreement, as amended, at a per annum rate equaland to 0.20% ifaccelerate the average daily usedpayment on any unpaid principal amount is greater than 50.00%of all outstanding loans and interest thereon. On March 1, 2023, we entered into an amendment to the 2022 Credit Agreement, or the First Amendment. The material terms of the commitments and 0.25% ifFirst Amendment provided for revisions to certain financial covenants for a limited period of time. Except as modified by the average daily used amount is less than or equal to 50.00%terms of the commitments, which fee shall be measuredFirst Amendment, the material terms of the 2022 Credit Agreement remained in full force and payable on a quarterly basis.effect.
As of both December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, our aggregate borrowing capacity under the 20182022 Credit Facility was $530,000,000.$1,050,000,000, excluding the $25,000,000 in standby letters of credit described above. As of December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, borrowings outstanding under the 2022 Credit Facility totaled $476,900,000$914,900,000 ($914,144,000, net of deferred financing costs related to the senior unsecured term loan facility portion of the 2022 Credit Facility) and $396,800,000,$965,900,000 ($965,060,000, net of deferred financing costs related to the senior unsecured term loan facility portion of the 2022 Credit Facility), respectively, and the weighted average interest rate on such borrowings outstanding was 2.12%7.08% and 3.50%, respectively,6.07% per annum.
8.annum, respectively. As of December 31, 2023, we entered into interest rate swaps to mitigate the risk associated with the entire $550,000,000 outstanding borrowing amount of our term loan. See Note 10, Derivative Financial Instruments, for a further discussion.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
In January 2022, in connection with the 2022 Credit Agreement, we incurred an aggregate $3,161,000 loss on the extinguishment of a portion of senior unsecured term loan related to former credit facilities. Such loss on extinguishment of debt is recorded as an increase to interest expense in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, and primarily consisted of lender fees we paid to obtain the 2022 Credit Facility.
On February 14, 2024, we, through our operating partnership, entered into an agreement, or the 2024 Credit Agreement, that amends, restates, supersedes and replaces the 2022 Credit Agreement. See Note 21, Subsequent Events — 2024 Credit Facility, for a further discussion.
2019 Trilogy Credit Facility
We, recordthrough Trilogy RER, LLC, are party to an amended and restated loan agreement, or the 2019 Trilogy Credit Agreement, among certain subsidiaries of Trilogy OpCo, LLC, Trilogy RER, LLC, and Trilogy Pro Services, LLC; KeyBank; CIT Bank, N.A.; Regions Bank; KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc.; Regions Capital Markets; Bank of America; The Huntington National Bank; and a syndicate of other banks, as lenders named therein, with respect to a senior secured revolving credit facility that had an aggregate maximum principal amount of $360,000,000, consisting of: (i) a $325,000,000 secured revolver supported by real estate assets and ancillary business cash flow and (ii) a $35,000,000 accounts receivable revolving credit facility supported by eligible accounts receivable, or the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility. The proceeds of the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility may be used for acquisitions, debt repayment and general corporate purposes. The maximum principal amount of the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility could be increased by up to $140,000,000, for a total principal amount of $500,000,000, subject to certain conditions. Unless defined herein, all capitalized terms under this “2019 Trilogy Credit Facility” subsection are defined in the 2019 Trilogy Credit Agreement, as amended.
On December 20, 2022, we entered into an amendment to the 2019 Trilogy Credit Agreement, or the 2019 Trilogy Credit Amendment. The material terms of the 2019 Trilogy Credit Amendment provided for an increase to the secured revolver amount from $325,000,000 to $365,000,000, thereby increasing our aggregate maximum principal amount under the credit facility from $360,000,000 to $400,000,000. In addition, all references to LIBOR were replaced with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR. On March 30, 2023, we further amended the 2019 Trilogy Credit Agreement to update the definition of Implied Debt Service, which is used to calculate the Real Estate Borrowing Base Availability, for interest rate changes and to add an annual interest-only payment calculation option. Except as modified by the terms of the amendments, the material terms of the 2019 Trilogy Credit Agreement remain in full force and effect.
The 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility was due to mature on September 5, 2023; however, pursuant to the terms of the 2019 Trilogy Credit Agreement, at such time we extended the maturity date for one 12-month period to mature on September 5, 2024, and paid an extension fee of $600,000. On December 21, 2023, we further amended such agreement to extend the maturity date to June 5, 2025 and paid an extension fee of $745,000. At our option, the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility bears interest at per annum rates equal to (a) SOFR, plus 2.75% for SOFR Rate Loans and (b) for Base Rate Loans, 1.75% plus the highest of: (i) the fluctuating rate per annum of interest in effect for such day as established from time to time by KeyBank as its prime rate, (ii) 0.50% above the Federal Funds Effective Rate, and (iii) 1.00% above one-month Adjusted Term SOFR.
As of both December 31, 2023 and 2022, our aggregate borrowing capacity under the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility was $400,000,000. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, borrowings outstanding under the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility totaled $309,823,000 and $316,734,000, respectively, and the weighted average interest rate on such borrowings outstanding was 8.20% and 7.17% per annum, respectively. On December 21, 2023, we, through Trilogy RER, LLC, entered into an interest rate swap transaction to mitigate the risk with respect to $200,000,000 of our borrowings under the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility. See Note 10, Derivative Financial Instruments, for a further discussion.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
10. Derivative Financial Instruments
We use derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk associated with variable-rate debt. We recorded such derivative financial instruments in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets as either an asset or a liability, as applicable, measured at fair value. We did not have any derivative financial instruments as of December 31, 2022. The following table lists the derivative financial instruments held by us as of December 31, 2020 and 2019,2023, which arewere included in security deposits, prepaid rentother assets and other liabilities in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets:sheets (dollars in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Instrument | | Notional Amount | | Index | | Interest Rate | | Effective Date | | Maturity Date | | | | Fair Value
December 31, 2023 |
| Swap | | $ | 275,000 | | | one month
Term SOFR | | 3.74% | | 02/01/23 | | 01/19/26 | | | | $ | 1,463 | |
| Swap | | 275,000 | | | one month
Term SOFR | | 4.41% | | 08/08/23 | | 01/19/26 | | | | (2,178) | |
| Swap | | 200,000 | | | one month
Term SOFR | | 4.40% | | 01/05/24 | | 06/05/25 | | | | (211) | |
| | $ | 750,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (926) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Fair Value |
| | | | | | | | | | December 31, |
| Instrument | | Notional Amount | | Index | | Interest Rate | | Maturity Date | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Swap | | $ | 139,500,000 | | | one month LIBOR | | 2.49% | | 11/19/21 | | $ | (2,915,000) | | | $ | (2,441,000) | |
| Swap | | 58,800,000 | | | one month LIBOR | | 2.49% | | 11/19/21 | | (1,229,000) | | | (1,029,000) | |
| Swap | | 45,000,000 | | | one month LIBOR | | 0.20% | | 11/19/21 | | (27,000) | | | 0 | |
| Swap | | 36,700,000 | | | one month LIBOR | | 2.49% | | 11/19/21 | | (766,000) | | | (642,000) | |
| Swap | | 15,000,000 | | | one month LIBOR | | 2.53% | | 11/19/21 | | (318,000) | | | (273,000) | |
| | $ | 295,000,000 | | | | | | | | | $ | (5,255,000) | | | $ | (4,385,000) | |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
As of both December 31, 2020 and 2019,2023, none of our derivative financial instruments were designated as hedges as defined by guidance under ASC Topic 815.hedges. Derivative financial instruments not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage our exposure to interest rate movements, but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements. For the years ended December 31, 20202023, 2022 and 2019,2021, we recorded $(870,000)a net (loss) gain in the fair value of derivative financial instruments of $(926,000), $500,000 and $(4,385,000),$8,200,000, respectively, as an increasea (increase)/decrease to interesttotal interest expense in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations related toand comprehensive loss. Included in the changegain in the fair value of our derivative financial instruments. We did 0t have any derivative financial instruments duringrecognized for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021 is $823,000 related to the fair value of an interest rate swap entered into by GAHR IV, which matured on November 19, 2021.
See Note 14,15, Fair Value Measurements, for a further discussion of the fair value of our derivative financial instruments.
9. Identified Intangible Liabilities, Net
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, identified intangible liabilities, net consisted of below-market leases of $1,295,000 and $1,601,000, respectively, net of accumulated amortization of $608,000 and $702,000, respectively. Amortization expense on below-market leases for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $306,000, $517,000 and $380,000 respectively, which was recorded to real estate revenue in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
The weighted average remaining life of below-market leases was 11.6 years and 11.3 years as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, estimated amortization expense on below-market leases for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter was as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| Year | | Amount |
| 2021 | | $ | 236,000 | |
| 2022 | | 217,000 | |
| 2023 | | 207,000 | |
| 2024 | | 161,000 | |
| 2025 | | 123,000 | |
| Thereafter | | 351,000 | |
| Total | | $ | 1,295,000 | |
10.11. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
We are not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against us, which, if determined unfavorably to us, would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Environmental Matters
We follow a policy of monitoring our properties for the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. While there can be no assurance that a material environmental liability does not exist at our properties, we are not currently aware of any environmental liability with respect to our properties that would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Further, we are not aware of any material environmental liability or any unasserted claim or assessment with respect to an environmental liability that we believe would require additional disclosure or the recording of a loss contingency.
Other
Our other commitments and contingencies include the usual obligations of real estate owners and operators in the normal course of business, which include calls/puts to sell/acquire properties. In our view, these matters are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Since March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has been dramatically impacting the United States, which has resulted in an aggressive worldwide effort to contain the spread of the virus. These efforts have significantly and adversely disrupted economic markets and impacted commercial activity worldwide, including markets in which we own and/or operate properties, and the prolonged economic impact remains uncertain. In addition, the continuously evolving nature of the COVID-19
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
pandemic makes it difficult to ascertain the long-term impact it will have on real estate markets and our portfolio of investments. Considerable uncertainty still surrounds the COVID-19 pandemic and its effects on the population, as well as the effectiveness of any responses taken on national and local levels by government and public health authorities and businesses to contain and combat the outbreak and spread of the virus, including the widespread availability and use of effective vaccines. In particular, government-imposed business closures and re-opening restrictions, as well as self-imposed restrictions of discretionary activities, have dramatically impacted the operations of our real estate investments and our tenants across the country, such as creating significant declines in resident occupancy. Further, our senior housing facilities have also experienced dramatic increases and may continue to experience increases in costs to care for residents; particularly labor costs to maintain staffing levels to care for the aged population during this crisis, costs of COVID-19 testing of employees and residents and costs to procure the volume of personal protective equipment and other supplies required.
We received and recognized in our accompanying consolidated financial statements stimulus funds through economic relief programs of the CARES Act, as discussed at Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Government Grants. We have also taken actions to strengthen our balance sheet and preserve liquidity in response to the COVID-19 pandemic risks. From March to December 2020, we postponed non-essential capital expenditures. In addition, in March 2020, we reduced the stockholder distribution rate and partially suspended our share repurchase plan. See Note 12, Equity — Share Repurchase Plan, for a further discussion. We are continuously monitoring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, residents, tenants, operating partners, managers, portfolio of investments and on the United States and global economies.
11.12. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
As of both December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, we, through our advisordirect and indirect subsidiaries, owned all of the 208 limited partnership units outstanding in our operating partnership. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, we owned greater than a 99.99%95.0% general partnership interest in our operating partnership, and our advisor owned less than a 0.01%the remaining 5.0% limited partnership interest in our operating partnership. Our advisor is entitled to special redemption rightspartnership was owned by the NewCo Sellers. Some of itsthe limited partnership units. The noncontrolling interestunits outstanding, which account for approximately 1.0% of our advisor in ourtotal operating partnership which hasunits outstanding, have redemption features outside of our control isand are accounted for as a redeemable noncontrolling interest and isinterests presented outside of permanent equity in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. See Note 13, Related Party Transactions
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Liquidity Stage — Subordinated Participation Interest — Subordinated Distribution Upon Listing,(Continued)
As of December 31, 2023 and Note 13, Related Party Transactions — Subordinated Distribution Upon Termination, for2022, we, through Trilogy REIT Holdings, in which we indirectly hold a further discussion76.0% ownership interest, owned approximately 97.5% and 96.2%, respectively, of the redemption featuresoutstanding equity interests of Trilogy. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, certain members of Trilogy’s management and certain members of an advisory committee to Trilogy’s board of directors owned approximately 2.5% and 3.8%, respectively, of the limitedoutstanding equity interests of Trilogy. We account for such equity interests as redeemable noncontrolling interests in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 480-10-S99-3A given certain features associated with such equity interests. For the year ended December 31, 2023, we redeemed a portion of the equity interests owned by a member of Trilogy’s management and a member of Trilogy’s advisory committee for an aggregate of $17,150,000. As of December 31, 2023, we reclassified the balance of the remaining equity interest owned by such member of Trilogy’s advisory committee from redeemable noncontrolling interest to other liabilities in our accompanying consolidated balance sheet, and subsequently redeemed such interest in January 2024 for cash of approximately $25,312,000. In October 2022, we redeemed a portion of the equity interests owned by certain previous or current members of Trilogy’s management and advisory committee for cash of $3,707,000.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we own, through our operating partnership, units.
In connectionapproximately 98.0% of the joint ventures with our acquisitionsan affiliate of Meridian Senior Living, LLC, or Meridian, that owned Central Florida Senior Housing Portfolio, Pinnacle Beaumont ALF and Pinnacle Warrenton ALF, we own approximately 98.0% of the joint ventures with Meridian. In connection with our acquisitions of Catalina West Haven ALF and Catalina Madera ALF, we own approximately 90.0% of the joint venture with Avalon.ALF. The noncontrolling interests held by Meridian and Avalon have redemption features outside of our control and are accounted for as redeemable noncontrolling interests in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net — Dispositions of Real Estate Investments, for dispositions within our Central Florida Senior Housing Portfolio in 2023 and 2022.
We previously owned 90.0% of the joint venture with Avalon Health Care, Inc., or Avalon, that owned Catalina West Haven ALF and Catalina Madera ALF. The noncontrolling interests held by Avalon had redemption features outside of our control and were accounted for as redeemable noncontrolling interests until December 1, 2022, when we exercised our right to purchase the remaining 10.0% of the joint venture with Avalon for a contract purchase price of $295,000. As such, 10.0% of the net earnings of such joint venture were allocated to redeemable noncontrolling interests in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss following the Merger and through November 30, 2022.
We record the carrying amount of redeemable noncontrolling interests at the greater of: (i) the initial carrying amount, increased or decreased for the noncontrolling interests’ share of net income or loss and distributions;distributions or (ii) the redemption value. The changes in the carrying amount of redeemable noncontrolling interests consisted of the following for the years ended December 31, 20202023 and 2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | | |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | |
| Beginning balance | | $ | 1,462,000 | | | $ | 1,371,000 | | | |
| Additions | | 1,138,000 | | | 151,000 | | | |
| Distributions | | (104,000) | | | (151,000) | | | |
| Adjustment to redemption value | | 615,000 | | | 173,000 | | | |
| Net loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests | | (493,000) | | | (82,000) | | | |
| Ending balance | | $ | 2,618,000 | | | $ | 1,462,000 | | | |
2022 (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Beginning balance | | $ | 81,598 | | | $ | 72,725 | |
| | | | |
| Additional redeemable noncontrolling interest | | — | | | 273 | |
| Reclassification from equity | | 83 | | | 83 | |
| Reclassification to other liabilities | | (25,312) | | | — | |
| Distributions | | (1,369) | | | (2,817) | |
| Repurchase of redeemable noncontrolling interests | | (17,150) | | | (4,034) | |
| Adjustment to redemption value | | (2,944) | | | 15,773 | |
| Net loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests | | (1,063) | | | (405) | |
| Ending balance | | $ | 33,843 | | | $ | 81,598 | |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
12.13. Equity
Preferred Stock
OurPursuant to our charter, authorizes uswe are authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares of our preferred stock, $0.01 par value $0.01 per share. As of both December 31, 20202023 and 2019, 02022, no shares of our preferred stock were issued and outstanding.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Common Stock
OurPursuant to our charter, authorizes usas amended, we are authorized to issue 1,000,000,000 shares of our common stock, $0.01 par value $0.01 per share, whereby 900,000,000200,000,000 shares are classified as Class T common stock and 800,000,000 shares were classified as Class I common stock. On January 26, 2024, we further amended our charter to reclassify shares of our Class I common stock such that 200,000,000 shares are classified as Class T common stock, 100,000,000 shares are classified as Class I common stock. Each sharestock and 700,000,000 shares are classified as common stock without any designation as to class or series.
On October 4, 2021, our board authorized the reinstatement of our common stock, regardless of class, will be entitled to one vote per share on matters presented todistribution reinvestment plan, as amended, or the common stockholders for approval; provided, however, that stockholders of one share class shall have exclusive voting rights on any amendment to our charter that would alter only the contract rights of that share class, and no stockholders of another share class shall be entitled to vote thereon. As of both December 31, 2020 and 2019, our advisor owned 20,833 shares of our Class T common stock. On February 15, 2019, we terminated our initial offering and we continuedAHR DRIP, to offer up to $100,000,000 of shares of our common stock pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-3 under the 2019Securities Act filed by GAHR IV, or the AHR DRIP Offering. On November 14, 2022, our board suspended the AHR DRIP Offering beginning with the distributions declared, if any, for the quarter ending December 31, 2022. As a result of the suspension of the AHR DRIP, unless and until our board reinstates the AHR DRIP Offering, stockholders who are current participants in the AHR DRIP will be paid future distributions in cash. See Note 1, Organization and Description of Business — Public Offerings, and the “Distribution Reinvestment Plan” section below for a further discussion.
Through December 31, 2020, we had issued 75,639,681 aggregateWe effected a one-for-four reverse split of our common stock on November 15, 2022 and a corresponding reverse split of the partnership units in our operating partnership. As a result of the Reverse Splits, every four shares of our common stock or four partnership units in our operating partnership were automatically combined and converted into one issued and outstanding share of our common stock of like class, or one partnership unit of like class, as applicable, rounded to the nearest 1/100th share or unit. The Reverse Splits impacted all classes of common stock and partnership units proportionately and had no impact on any stockholder’s or partner’s ownership percentage. Neither the number of authorized shares nor the par value of the Class T common stock and Class I common stock were ultimately impacted. All numbers of common shares and per share data, as well as partnership units in connectionour operating partnership, in our accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes have been retroactively adjusted for all periods presented to give effect to the Reverse Splits.
On February 9, 2024, we closed the 2024 Offering and issued 64,400,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, for a total of $772,800,000 in gross proceeds, including the exercise in full of the underwriters’ overallotment option to purchase up to an additional 8,400,000 shares of common stock. In conjunction with the primary portion of our initial offering and 7,595,594 aggregate2024 Offering, such shares of ourcommon stock were listed on the NYSE and began trading on February 7, 2024.
Our Class T common stock and Class I common stock pursuantare identical to our DRIP Offerings. We also granted an aggregatecommon stock, except that such shares are not currently listed on the NYSE or any other national securities exchange. Upon the six month anniversary of 105,000 sharesthe listing of our restrictedcommon stock for trading on the NYSE, which is August 5, 2024, each share of our Class T common stock and Class I common stock will automatically, and without any stockholder action, convert into one share of our listed common stock.
Distribution Reinvestment Plan
Our DRIP allowed our stockholders to our independent directors and repurchased 2,021,771elect to reinvest an amount equal to the distributions declared on their shares of common stock in additional shares of our common stock underin lieu of receiving cash distributions. However, on November 14, 2022, our share repurchase plan throughboard suspended the DRIP offering beginning with the distributions declared for the quarter ended December 31, 2020.2022. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, we had 81,339,337 and 79,899,874 aggregate shares of our Class T and Class I common stock, respectively, issued and outstanding.
Distribution Reinvestment Plan
We had registered and reserved $150,000,000 in shares of our common stock for sale pursuant to the DRIP in our initial offering. The DRIP allows stockholders to purchase additional Class T shares and Class I shares of our common stock through the reinvestment of distributions during our initial offering. Pursuant to the DRIP, distributions with respect to Class T shares are reinvested in Class T shares and distributions with respect to Class I shares are reinvested in Class I shares. On February 15, 2019, we terminated our initial offering and we continued to offer up to $100,000,000 in shares of our common stock pursuant to the 2019 DRIP Offering. In connection with our board’s strategic alternative review process and in order to facilitate a strategic transaction, on March 18, 2021, our board authorizedresult of the suspension of the DRIP effective as of April 1, 2021,offering, unless and until our board reinstates the DRIP. As a consequence of the suspension of the DRIP beginning with the April 2021 distributions, which will be payable on or about May 1, 2021, there will be no further issuances of shares pursuant to the DRIP, andoffering, stockholders who are current participants in the DRIP were or will receive cashbe paid distributions instead.in cash. As of both December 31, 2023 and 2022, a total of $91,448,000 in distributions were reinvested that resulted in 2,431,695 shares of common stock being issued pursuant to the AHR DRIP Offering.
Since April 6, 2018,October 5, 2016, our board hashad approved and established an estimated per share net asset value, or NAV, on at least an annual basis.annually. Commencing with the distribution payment to stockholders paid in the month following such board approval, shares of our common stock issued pursuant the DRIPto our distribution reinvestment plan were or will be issued at the current estimated per share NAV until such time as our board determinesdetermined an updated estimated per share NAV. The following is a summary
For the year ended December 31, 2023, there were no distributions reinvested and no shares of our historical estimated per share NAV ofcommon stock were issued pursuant to our Class T and Class I common stock:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Approval Date by our Board | | Estimated Per
Share NAV
(Unaudited) | | |
04/06/18 | | $ | 9.65 | | | |
04/04/19 | | $ | 9.54 | | | |
04/02/20 | | $ | 9.54 | | | |
DRIP offerings. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192022 and 2018, $19,862,000, $25,533,0002021, $36,812,000 and $17,612,000,$7,666,000, respectively, in distributions were reinvested and 2,081,895, 2,666,913992,964 and 1,838,711207,866 shares of our common stock, respectively, were issued pursuant to our DRIP Offerings. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, a total of $72,492,000 and $52,630,000, respectively, in distributions were cumulatively reinvested that resulted in 7,595,594 and 5,513,699 shares of our common stock, respectively, being issued pursuant to our DRIP Offerings.offerings.
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Share Repurchase Plan
Due to the impact the COVID-19 pandemic has had on the United States and globally, and the ongoing uncertainty of the severity and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and its effects, beginning in March 2020, our board decided to take steps to protect our capital and maximize our liquidity in an effort to strengthen our long-term financial prospects. As a result, on March 31, 2020, our board suspended our share repurchase plan with respect to all repurchase requests other than repurchases resulting from the death or qualifying disability of stockholders, beginning with share repurchase requests submitted for repurchase during the second quarter of 2020. Repurchase requests resulting from the death or qualifying disability of stockholders were not suspended, but remained subject to all terms and conditions of our share repurchase plan, including our board’s discretion to determine whether we have sufficient funds available to repurchase any shares.
In connection with our board’s strategic alternative review process and in order to facilitate a strategic transaction, on March 18, 2021, our board approved the suspension of our share repurchase plan with respect to all repurchase requests received by us after February 28, 2021, including repurchases resulting from the death or qualifying disability of stockholders, until such time, if any, as our board determines to reinstate our share repurchase plan.
Prior to the suspension of our share repurchase plan, ourOur share repurchase plan allowed for repurchases of shares of our common stock by us when certain criteria are met. Share repurchases were made at the sole discretion of our board. Subject to the availability of the funds for share repurchases and other certain conditions, we generally limited the number of shares of our common stock repurchased during any calendar year to 5.0% of the weighted average number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the prior calendar year; provided however, that shares subject to a repurchase requested upon the death or “qualifying disability,” as defined in our share repurchase plan, of a stockholder were not subject to this cap. Funds for the repurchase of shares of our common stock came exclusively from the cumulative proceeds we received from the sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP Offerings.offerings.
All repurchases of our shares of common stock were subjectPursuant to a one-year holding period, except for repurchases made in connection with a stockholder’s death or “qualifying disability,” as defined in our share repurchase plan. Further, all share repurchases were repurchased following a one-year holding period at a price between 92.5% to 100% of each stockholder’s repurchase amount depending on the period of time their shares had been held. During our initial offering and with respect to shares repurchased for the quarter ending March 31, 2019, the repurchase amount for shares repurchased under our share repurchase plan, wasthe repurchase price is equal to the lesser of (i) the amount per share that a stockholder paid for their shares of our common stock, or (ii) the per share offering price in our initial offering. Commencing with shares repurchased for the quarter ending June 30, 2019, the repurchase amount for shares repurchased under our share repurchase plan was the lesser of (i) the amount per share the stockholder paid for their shares of our common stock, or (ii) the most recent estimated value of one share of the applicable class ofour common stock, as determined by our board. Seeboard, except that the “Distribution Reinvestment Plan” section above for a summaryrepurchase price with respect to repurchases resulting from the death or qualifying disability of our historicalstockholders was equal to the most recently published estimated per share NAV. However, if sharesOn October 4, 2021, as a result of the Merger, our board authorized the partial reinstatement of our common stock were repurchased in connectionshare repurchase plan with a stockholder’srespect to requests to repurchase shares resulting from the death or qualifying disability of stockholders, effective with respect to qualifying repurchases for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2021. All share repurchase price was no lessrequests other than 100%those requests resulting from the death or qualifying disability of the price paid to acquire the shares ofstockholders were rejected. On November 14, 2022, our common stock from us. Furthermore,board suspended our share repurchase plan provided that if there were insufficient funds to honor allbeginning with share repurchase requests pendingfor the quarter ending December 31, 2022. All share repurchase requests, mayincluding requests resulting from the death or qualifying disability of stockholders, commencing with the quarter ended December 31, 2022, will not be honored among all requests for repurchaseprocessed, will be considered canceled in any given repurchase period, as follows: first, pro rata as to repurchases sought upon a stockholder’s death; next, pro rata as to repurchases sought by stockholders with a qualifying disability;full and finally, pro rata as to otherwill not be considered outstanding repurchase requests.
For the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018,2021, we repurchased 664,932, 928,6751,681, 559,195 and 350,41810,356 shares of our common stock, respectively, for an aggregate of $6,214,000, $8,609,000$62,000, $20,699,000 and $3,312,000,$382,000, respectively, at an average repurchase price of $9.34, $9.27$37.16, $37.02 and $9.45$36.88 per share, respectively. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, we cumulatively repurchased 2,021,771 and 1,356,839 shares ofrespectively, pursuant to our common stock, respectively, for an aggregate of $18,870,000 and $12,656,000, respectively, at an averageshare repurchase price of $9.33 per share. In January 2021, we repurchased 72,339 shares of our common stock, for an aggregate of $713,000, at an average repurchase price of $9.86 per share.plan. All shares were repurchased using the cumulative proceeds we received from the sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP Offerings.offerings.
2015 Incentive PlanNoncontrolling Interests in Total Equity
Membership Interest in Trilogy REIT Holdings
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, Trilogy REIT Holdings owned approximately 97.5% and 96.2%, respectively, of Trilogy. Prior to October 1, 2021, we were the indirect owner of a 70.0% interest in Trilogy REIT Holdings pursuant to an amended joint venture agreement with an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of NorthStar Healthcare Income, Inc., or NHI, and a wholly-owned subsidiary of GAHR IV Operating Partnership. We adoptedserve as the 2015 Incentive Plan,managing member of Trilogy REIT Holdings. In connection with the Merger, the wholly-owned subsidiary of GAHR IV Operating Partnership sold its 6.0% interest in Trilogy REIT Holdings to GAHR III, thereby increasing our indirect ownership in Trilogy REIT Holdings to 76.0%. Through September 30, 2021, 30.0% of the net earnings of Trilogy REIT Holdings were allocated to noncontrolling interests, and since October 1, 2021, 24.0% of the net earnings of Trilogy REIT Holdings were allocated to a noncontrolling interest.
On November 3, 2023, we entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, or the MIPA, with subsidiaries of NHI, which provides us with the option to purchase their 24.0% minority membership interest in Trilogy REIT Holdings. If we exercise this purchase option, we will own 100% of Trilogy REIT Holdings, which (assuming that there are no changes in the equity capitalization of Trilogy prior to consummation of the purchase) will in turn cause us to indirectly own approximately 97.5% of Trilogy. Subject to our first satisfying certain closing conditions, the option is exercisable for a closing before September 30, 2025 assuming that we exercise both extension options described below. If we exercise our purchase option, the all-cash purchase price would be $240,500,000 if we consummate the purchase on or before March 31, 2024, would increase to $247,000,000 if we consummate the purchase from April 1, 2024 to and including December 31, 2024 and would further increase to $260,000,000 if we consummate the purchase on or after January 1, 2025.
The MIPA also allows us (at our election), instead of paying all cash, to consummate the purchase transaction by using a combination of cash and the issuance of new Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, or our incentive plan, pursuant toConvertible Preferred Stock, as purchase price consideration. We must pay at least a minimum amount of the purchase price in cash, in which our board, or a committee of our independent directors, may make grants of options, restricted shares of common stock, stock purchase rights, stock appreciation rights or other awards to our independent directors, employees and consultants. The maximum number ofcase we would pay the remaining amount in shares of our common stock that mayConvertible Preferred Stock. The minimum cash amount will be issued pursuant$24,050,000 if we consummate the purchase on or before March 31, 2024, $24,700,000 if we consummate the purchase from April 1, 2024 to our incentive plan is 4,000,000 shares. For the years endedand including December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018,2024, or $26,000,000 if we grantedconsummate the purchase on or after January 1, 2025. If issued, our Convertible Preferred Stock will be perpetual, will have a cumulative cash dividend with an aggregate of 22,500 shares of our restricted Class T common stock at a weighted average grant date fair value of $9.54, $9.54 and $9.65 per share, respectively, to our independent directors in connection with their re-election to our board or in consideration for their past services rendered. Such shares vested 20.0% immediately on the grant
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
initial annual rate of 4.75% (on the liquidation preference per share of $25.00 of our Convertible Preferred Stock) and will be redeemable by us at any time. The annual dividend rate will increase over time, and the redemption price will vary based on the date of redemption. In addition, holders of shares of our Convertible Preferred Stock will have the right, at any time on or after July 1, 2026 and from time to time, to convert some or all of such shares into shares of our common stock, subject to certain customary exceptions. As of December 31, 2023, we did not exercise the MIPA purchase option.
Other Noncontrolling Interests
In connection with our acquisition and operation of Trilogy, profit interest units in Trilogy, or the Profit Interests, were issued to Trilogy Management Services, LLC and an independent director of Trilogy, both unaffiliated third parties that manage or direct the day-to-day operations of Trilogy. The Profit Interests consisted of time-based or performance-based commitments. The time-based Profit Interests were measured at their grant date fair value and vest in increments of 20.0% will vest on each anniversary of the first four anniversaries ofrespective grant date over a five year period. We amortized the grant date. We follow ASC Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation,time-based Profit Interests on a straight-line basis over the vesting periods, which are recorded to account for our stock compensation pursuant to our incentive plan. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we recognized stock compensation expense of $215,000, $207,000 and $185,000, respectively, which is included in general and administrative in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Offering Costs
Selling Commissions
Throughoperations and comprehensive loss. The performance-based Profit Interests were subject to a performance commitment and would have vested upon liquidity events as defined in the terminationProfit Interests agreements. The performance-based Profit Interests were measured at their fair value on the adoption date of ASU 2018-07, Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, using a modified retrospective approach. The nonvested awards are presented as noncontrolling interests in total equity in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets, and are re-classified to redeemable noncontrolling interests upon vesting as they had redemption features outside of our initial offering on February 15, 2019,control similar to the common stock units held by Trilogy’s management. See Note 12, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests, for a further discussion.
In December 2021, we generally paid our dealer manager selling commissions of up to 3.0%redeemed a part of the gross offering proceeds fromtime-based Profit Interests and all of the saleperformance-based Profit Interests that were included in noncontrolling interests in total equity. We redeemed such Profit Interests for $16,517,000, which was paid $8,650,000 in cash and $7,867,000 through the issuance of Class T shares ofadditional equity interests in Trilogy that are classified as redeemable noncontrolling interests in our common stock pursuant to the primary portion of our initial offering. No selling commissionsconsolidated balance sheets. There were payable on Class I sharesno canceled, expired or shares of our common stock sold pursuant to our DRIP Offerings. Following the termination of our initial offering on February 15, 2019, we no longer incur additional selling commissions. Forexercised Profit Interests during the years ended December 30, 201931, 2023 and 2018, we incurred $2,241,000 and $6,983,000, respectively, in selling commissions to our dealer manager. Such commissions were charged to stockholders’ equity as such amounts were paid to our dealer manager from the gross proceeds of our initial offering.
Dealer Manager Fee
Through the termination of our initial offering on February 15, 2019, with respect to shares of our Class T common stock, our dealer manager generally received a dealer manager fee of up to 3.0% of the gross offering proceeds from the sale of Class T shares of our common stock pursuant to our initial offering, of which 1.0% of the gross offering proceeds was funded by us and up to an amount equal to 2.0% of the gross offering proceeds was funded by our advisor. Effective March 1, 2017 and through the termination of our initial offering on February 15, 2019, with respect to shares of our Class I common stock, our dealer manager generally received a dealer manager fee up to an amount equal to 1.5% of the gross offering proceeds from the sale of Class I shares of our common stock pursuant to the primary portion of our initial offering, all of which was funded by our advisor. No dealer manager fee was payable on shares of our common stock sold pursuant to our DRIP Offerings.
Following the termination of our initial offering on February 15, 2019, we no longer incur additional dealer manager fees. 2022.For the years ended December 31, 20192023, 2022 and 2018,2021, we incurred $759,000recognized stock compensation expense related to the Profit Interests of $83,000, $83,000 and $2,364,000, respectively, in dealer manager fees$8,801,000, respectively.
One of our consolidated subsidiaries issued non-voting preferred shares of beneficial interests to our dealer manager. Such fees were charged to stockholders’ equity as such amounts were paid to our dealer manager or its affiliates from the grossqualified investors for total proceeds of our initial offering. See Note 13, Related Party Transactions — Offering Stage — Dealer Manager Fee, for a further discussion$125,000. These preferred shares of beneficial interests are entitled to receive cumulative preferential cash dividends at the rate of 12.5% per annum. We classify the value of the dealer manager fee funded by our advisor.
Stockholder Servicing Fee
We pay our dealer manager a quarterly stockholder servicing fee with respect to our Class T shares sold as additional compensation to the dealer manager and participating broker-dealers. No stockholder servicing fee is paid with respect to Class I shares orsubsidiary’s preferred shares of beneficial interests as noncontrolling interests in our common stock sold pursuant to our DRIP Offerings. The stockholder servicing fee accrues daily in an amount equal to 1/365th of 1.0%accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the dividends of the purchase price per sharepreferred shares of beneficial interests in net income or loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in our Class T shares soldaccompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
As of both December 31, 2023 and 2022, we owned an 86.0% interest in the primary portion of our initial offering. We will cease paying the stockholder servicing fee with respect to our Class T shares sold in the primary portion of our initial offering upon the occurrence of certain defined events,a consolidated limited liability company that owns Lakeview IN Medical Plaza. As such, as our redemption of such Class T shares. Our dealer manager may re-allow to participating broker-dealers all or a portion14.0% of the stockholder servicing feenet earnings of Lakeview IN Medical Plaza were allocated to noncontrolling interests in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for services that such participating broker-dealers perform in connection with the shares of our Class T common stock. By agreement with participating broker-dealers, such stockholder servicing fee may be reduced or limited.
Following the termination of our initial offering on February 15, 2019, we no longer incur additional stockholder servicing fees. For the years ended December 31, 20192023, 2022 and 2018,2021. On February 6, 2024, we incurred $2,573,000purchased the 14.0% membership interest in the consolidated limited liability company that owns Lakeview IN Medical Plaza from an unaffiliated third party for a contract purchase price of $441,000. In connection with such purchase and $8,069,000, respectively,as of such date, we own a 100% interest in stockholder servicing fees to our dealer manager. such limited liability company.
As of both December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, we accrued $6,100,000 and $12,610,000, respectively,owned a 90.6% membership interest in connection witha consolidated limited liability company that owns Southlake TX Hospital. As such, 9.4% of the stockholder servicing fee payable, which is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities with a corresponding offsetnet earnings of Southlake TX Hospital were allocated to stockholders’ equitynoncontrolling interests in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Noncontrolling Interest
In connection with our acquisitionstatements of Louisiana Senior Housing Portfolio on January 3, 2020, as ofoperations and comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31, 20202023, 2022 and 2021.
Upon consummation of the Merger, through our operating partnership, we ownedacquired an approximate 90.0% interest in our consolidateda joint venture with SSMG that owns such properties.the Louisiana Senior Housing Portfolio. As such, 10.0% of the net earnings of the joint venture were allocated to noncontrolling interests in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the period from January 3, 2020 through December 31, 2020, and the carrying amount of suchcomprehensive loss since October 1, 2021.
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
noncontrollingAs discussed in Note 1, Organization and Description of Business, as of both December 31, 2023 and 2022, we, through our direct and indirect subsidiaries, own a 95.0% general partnership interest in our operating partnership, and the remaining 5.0% limited partnership interest in our operating partnership is owned by the NewCo Sellers. As of both December 31, 2023 and 2022, 4.0% of our total operating partnership units outstanding is presented in total equity in our accompanying consolidated balance sheetssheets. See Note 12, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests, for a further discussion.
Equity Compensation Plans
GAHR III 2013 Incentive Plan
Prior to the REIT Merger, GAHR III adopted the Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc. Incentive Plan, or the 2013 Incentive Plan, pursuant to which its board, or a committee of its independent directors, could grant options, shares of our common stock, stock purchase rights, stock appreciation rights or other awards to its independent directors, employees and consultants.
Under the 2013 Incentive Plan, GAHR III granted an aggregate of 33,750 shares of its restricted common stock, or I RSAs as defined below, which is equal to 31,273 shares of restricted Class I common stock, using the conversion ratio of 0.9266 shares of GAHR IV Class I common stock for each share of GAHR III restricted common stock, as determined in the Merger. Such restricted shares vest as to 20.0% of the shares on the date of grant and on each anniversary thereafter over four years from the date of grant and are subject to continuous service through the vesting dates. As of the Merger date, 4,170 shares such I RSAs remained unvested with a weighted average grant date fair value of $40.38.
AHR Incentive Plan
Pursuant to the AHR Incentive Plan, our board (with respect to options and restricted shares of common stock granted to independent directors), or our compensation committee (with respect to any other award), may grant options, restricted shares of common stock, stock purchase rights, stock appreciation rights or other awards to our independent directors, officers, employees and consultants. The AHR Incentive Plan terminates on June 15, 2033, and the maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be issued pursuant to such plan is 4,000,000 shares.
Restricted common stock
Pursuant to the AHR Incentive Plan, through December 31, 2023, we granted an aggregate of 315,459 shares of our restricted common stock, or RSAs, which include restricted Class T common stock and restricted Class I common stock, as defined in the AHR Incentive Plan. RSAs were granted to our independent directors in connection with their initial election or re-election to our board or in consideration of their past services rendered. In addition, certain executive officers and key employees received grants of restricted Class T common stock. In February 2024, we also granted an aggregate of 972,222 RSAs to independent directors, executive officers and certain employees upon completion of the 2024 Offering. RSAs generally have a vesting period ranging from one to four years and are subject to continuous service through the vesting dates.
Restricted stock units
Pursuant to the AHR Incentive Plan, through December 31, 2023, we granted to our executive officers an aggregate 70,751 of performance-based restricted stock units, or PBUs, representing the right to receive shares of our Class T common stock upon vesting. We also granted to our executive officers and certain employees 169,529 time-based restricted stock units, or TBUs, representing the right to receive shares of our Class T common stock upon vesting. PBUs and TBUs are collectively referred to as RSUs. RSUs granted to executive officers and employees, generally have a vesting period of up to three years and are subject to continuous service through the vesting dates and any performance conditions, as applicable.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
A summary of the status of our nonvested RSAs and RSUs as of December 31, 2020. We did not have any noncontrolling interest in total equity2023 and 2022 and the changes for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 is presented below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of
Nonvested
RSAs | | Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value | | Number of
Nonvested
RSUs | | Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Balance — December 31, 2021 | | 222,886 | | | $ | 36.99 | | | — | | | $ | — | |
| Granted | | 18,689 | | | $ | 37.16 | | | 60,077 | | | $ | 37.16 | |
| Vested | | (58,335) | | | $ | 37.14 | | | — | | | $ | — | |
| Forfeited | | — | | | $ | — | | | (11,524) | | | $ | 37.16 | |
| Balance — December 31, 2022 | | 183,240 | | | $ | 36.97 | | | 48,553 | | | $ | 37.16 | |
| Granted | | 26,156 | | | $ | 31.83 | | | 191,728 | | | $ | 31.40 | |
| Vested | | (62,352) | | | $ | 37.11 | | | (6,400) | | (1) | $ | 37.16 | |
| Forfeited | | — | | | — | | | (5,800) | | | $ | 32.57 | |
| Balance — December 31, 2023 | | 147,044 | | | $ | 35.99 | | | 228,081 | | | $ | 32.43 | |
___________
(1)Amount includes 2,280 shares of common stock that were withheld from issuance to satisfy employee minimum tax withholding requirements associated with the vesting of RSUs during the year ended December 31, 2019.2023.
For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, pursuant to the AHR Incentive Plan, we granted 26,156 and 18,689 shares of our restricted common stock, respectively, at a weighted average grant date fair value of $31.83 and $37.16 per share, respectively, to our executives and to our independent directors in connection with their election or re-election to our board. For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we recognized stock compensation expense related to awards granted pursuant to the AHR Incentive Plan of $5,385,000 and $3,935,000, respectively, based on the grant date fair value, which is equal to the most recently published estimated per share NAV. Stock compensation expense is included in general and administrative expenses in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, there was $6,865,000 and $6,888,000, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to nonvested RSAs and RSUs. As of December 31, 2023, this expense is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 1.6 years.
13.14. Related Party Transactions
Fees and Expenses Paid to Affiliates
AllThrough September 30, 2021, we were externally advised by our former advisor pursuant to an advisory agreement, as amended, or the Advisory Agreement, between us and our former advisor. Our former advisor, subject to the oversight and review of our board, provided asset management, property management, acquisition, disposition and other advisory services on our behalf consistent with our investment policies and objectives. Until September 30, 2021, all of our executive officers were officers of our former advisor and officers, limited partners and/or members of one of our non-independent directors are also executive officersformer co-sponsors and employees and/or holders of a direct or indirect interest in our advisor, oneother affiliates of our co-sponsorsformer advisor.
Prior to the Merger and the AHI Acquisition, our former advisor was 75.0% owned and managed by wholly-owned subsidiaries of AHI and 25.0% owned by a wholly-owned subsidiary of Griffin Capital, or other affiliated entities. We are affiliated withcollectively, our advisor, American Healthcare Investors andformer cosponsors. Prior to the AHI Acquisition, AHI was 47.1% owned by AHI Group Holdings; however, we areHoldings, 45.1% indirectly owned by DigitalBridge Group, Inc. (NYSE: DBRG), or DigitalBridge, and 7.8% owned by James F. Flaherty III. We were not affiliated with Griffin Capital, our dealer manager, Colony CapitalDigitalBridge or Mr. Flaherty. We entered intoFlaherty; however, we were affiliated with our former advisor, AHI and AHI Group Holdings.
On December 20, 2021, the Advisory Agreement which entitleswas assigned to NewCo, and as a result, any fees that would have otherwise been payable to our former advisor are no longer being paid to a third party. Following the consummation of the Merger in October 2021, we became self-managed and as a result we no longer incur any fees or expense reimbursements to our former advisor and its affiliates to specified compensation for certain services, as well as reimbursement of certain expenses. Our board, including a majority of our independent directors, has reviewed the material transactions between our affiliates and us during the year ended December 31, 2020. Set forth below is a description of the transactions with affiliates. We believe that we have executed all of the transactions set forth below on terms that are fair and reasonable to us and on terms no less favorable to us than those available from unaffiliated third parties. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we incurred $13,350,000, $16,296,000 and $22,355,000, respectively, in fees and expenses to our affiliates as detailed below.
Offering Stage
Dealer Manager Fee
Through the termination of our initial offering on February 15, 2019, with respect to shares of our Class T common stock, our dealer manager generally received a dealer manager fee of up to 3.0% of the gross offering proceedsarising from the sale of Class T shares of our common stock pursuant to the primary portion of our initial offering, of which 1.0% of the gross offering proceeds was funded by us and up to an amount equal to 2.0% of the gross offering proceeds was funded by our advisor. Effective March 1, 2017 and through the termination of our initial offering on February 15, 2019, with respect to shares of our Class I common stock, our dealer manager generally received a dealer manager fee up to an amount equal to 1.5% of the gross offering proceeds from the sale of Class I shares of our common stock pursuant to the primary portion of our initial offering, all of which was funded by our advisor. Our advisor recouped the portion of the dealer manager fee it funded through the receipt from us of the Contingent Advisor Payment, as defined below, through the payment of acquisition fees as described below. No dealer manager fee was payable on shares of our common stock sold pursuant to our DRIP Offerings.
Following the termination of our initial offering on February 15, 2019, we no longer incur additional dealer manager fees. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we incurred $1,687,000 and $4,878,000, respectively, payable to our advisor as part of the Contingent Advisor Payment in connection with the dealer manager fee that our advisor had incurred. Such fee was charged to stockholders’ equity as incurred with a corresponding offset to accounts payable due to affiliates in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. See Note 12, Equity — Offering Costs — Dealer Manager Fee, for a further discussion of the dealer manager fee funded by us.
Other Organizational and Offering Expenses
Through the termination of our initial offering on February 15, 2019, we incurred other organizational and offering expenses in connection with the primary portion of our initial offering (other than selling commissions, the dealer manager fee and the stockholder servicing fee) that were funded by our advisor. Our advisor recouped such expenses it funded through the receipt of the Contingent Advisor Payment from us, as described below, through the payment of acquisition fees. No other organizational and offering expenses were paid with respect to shares of our common stock sold pursuant to our DRIP Offerings.
Following the termination of our initial offering on February 15, 2019, we no longer incur additional other organizational and offering expenses. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we incurred $114,000 and $1,465,000, respectively, payable to our advisor as part of the Contingent Advisor Payment in connection with the other organizational and offering expenses that our advisor had incurred. Such expenses were charged to stockholders’ equity as incurred with a corresponding offset to accounts payable due to affiliates in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.Advisory Agreement.
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
AcquisitionWe did not incur any fees and Development Stage
Acquisition Fee
We payexpenses to our third-party affiliates for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. Fees and expenses incurred to our former advisor or its affiliates anfor the year ended December 31, 2021 were as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended |
| | December 31, 2021 |
| Asset management fees(1) | | $ | 16,187 | |
| Property management fees(2) | | 1,993 | |
| Acquisition fees(3) | | 1,363 | |
| Development fees(4) | | 856 | |
| Lease fees(5) | | 410 | |
| Operating expenses(6) | | 160 | |
| Construction management fees(7) | | 144 | |
| Total | | $ | 21,113 | |
___________(1)Asset management fees were included in general and administrative expenses in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
(2)Property management fees were included in rental expenses or general and administrative expenses in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, depending on the property type from which the fee was incurred.
(3)Acquisition fees in connection with the acquisition fee of up to 4.50%properties accounted for as asset acquisitions or the acquisition of real estate-related investments were capitalized as part of the contract purchase price, including any contingent or earn-out payments that may be paid, of each property we acquire. The 4.50% acquisitionassociated investments in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
(4)Development fees consist of a 2.25% base acquisition fee, or the base acquisition fee, for real estate acquisitions, and an additional 2.25% contingent advisor payment, or the Contingent Advisor Payment,were capitalized as applicable. The Contingent Advisor Payment allowed our advisor to recoup the portionpart of the dealer manager feeassociated investments in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
(5)Lease fees were capitalized as costs of entering into new leases and included in other organizational and offering expenses funded byassets, net in our advisor. Therefore, the amount of the Contingent Advisor Payment paid upon the closing of an acquisition did not exceed the then outstanding amounts paid byaccompanying consolidated balance sheets.
(6)We reimbursed our advisor for dealer manager fees and other organizational and offering expenses at the time of such closing. For these purposes, the amounts paid by our advisor and considered as “outstanding” were reduced by the amount of the Contingent Advisor Payment previously paid. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the initial $7,500,000 of amounts paid by our advisor to fund the dealer manager fee and other organizational and offering expenses, or the Contingent Advisor Payment Holdback, was retained by us until February 2019, the termination of our initial offering and the third anniversary of the commencement date of our initial offering, at which time such amount was paid to our advisor. Ourformer advisor or its affiliates are entitledfor operating expenses incurred in rendering services to receive these acquisition fees for properties acquired with funds raised in our initial offering, including acquisitions completed after the termination of the Advisory Agreement (including imputed leverage of 50.0% on funds raised in our initial offering), or funded with net proceeds from the sale of a property,us, subject to certain conditions. Our advisor may waive or defer all or a portion oflimitations. For the acquisition fee at any time12 months ended December 31, 2021, our operating expenses did not exceed such limitations. Operating expenses were generally included in general and from time to time,administrative expenses in our advisor’s sole discretion.accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
Base acquisition(7)Construction management fees arewere capitalized as part of the associated asset and included in real estate investments, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheetssheets.
Registration Rights Agreement
Upon consummation of the AHI Acquisition, GAHR III and the Surviving Partnership entered into a registration rights agreement, or are expensedthe Registration Rights Agreement, with Griffin-American Strategic Holdings, LLC, or HoldCo, pursuant to which, subject to certain limitations therein, as incurredpromptly as practicable following the later of the expiration of (i) the period commencing on the closing of the AHI Acquisition and included in acquisition related expenses in our accompanying consolidated statementsending upon the earliest to occur of operations, as applicable. For(a) the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we incurred base acquisition feessecond anniversary date of $1,485,000, $4,595,000 and $10,096,000, respectively, to our advisor. Asthe issuance of both December 31, 2020 and 2019, we paid $20,982,000 in Contingent Advisor Payments to our advisor and do not have any amounts outstanding due to our advisor. For a further discussion of amounts paidthe Surviving Partnership OP units issued in connection with the Contingent Advisor Payment, see the “Dealer Manager Fee”AHI Acquisition, (b) a change of control of Merger Sub and “Other Organizational and Offering Expenses” sections above.
Development Fee
In the event our advisor or its affiliates provide development-related services, we pay our advisor or its affiliates a development fee in an amount that is usual and customary for comparable services rendered for similar projects in the geographic market where the services are provided; however, we will not pay a development fee to our advisor or its affiliates if our advisor or its affiliates elect to receive an acquisition fee based on the cost of such development.
For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we incurred development fees of $87,000, $34,000 and $6,000 respectively, to our advisor, which was expensed as incurred and included in acquisition related expenses in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Reimbursement of Acquisition Expenses
We reimburse our advisor or its affiliates for acquisition expenses related to selecting, evaluating and acquiring assets, which are reimbursed regardless of whether an asset is acquired. The reimbursement of acquisition expenses, acquisition fees, total development costs and real estate commissions paid to unaffiliated third parties will not exceed, in the aggregate, 6.0% of the contract purchase price of the property, unless fees in excess of such limits are approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, such fees and expenses paid did not exceed 6.0% of the contract purchase price of our property acquisitions, except with respect to our acquisitions of Athens MOB Portfolio, Northern California Senior Housing Portfolio, Pinnacle Warrenton ALF, Glendale MOB, Missouri SNF Portfolio, Flemington MOB Portfolio and West Des Moines SNF, which excess fees and expenses were approved by our directors as set forth above.
Reimbursements of acquisition expenses are capitalized as part of the associated asset and included in real estate investments, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets or are expensed as incurred and included in acquisition related expenses in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations, as applicable. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we incurred $1,000, $0 and $2,000, respectively, in acquisition expenses to our advisor or its affiliates.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Operational Stage
Asset Management Fee
We pay our advisor or its affiliates a monthly fee for services rendered in connection with the management of our assets equal to one-twelfth of 0.80% of average invested assets. For such purposes, average invested assets means the average of the aggregate book value of our assets invested in real estate investments, before deducting depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other similar non-cash reserves, computed by taking the average of such values at the end of each month during the period of calculation.
For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we incurred $9,732,000, $8,276,000 and $4,975,000, respectively, in asset management fees to our advisor, which are included in general and administrative in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Property Management Fee
American Healthcare Investors or its designated personnel may provide property management services with respect to our properties or may sub-contract these duties to any third party and provide oversight of such third-party property manager. We pay American Healthcare Investors a monthly management fee equal to a percentage of the gross monthly cash receipts of such property as follows: (i) a property management oversight fee of 1.0% of the gross monthly cash receipts of any stand-alone, single-tenant, net leased property, except for such properties operated utilizing a RIDEA structure, for which we pay a property management oversight fee of 1.5% of the gross monthly cash receipts with respect to such property; (ii) a property management oversight fee of 1.5% of the gross monthly cash receipts of any property that is not a stand-alone, single-tenant, net leased property and for which American Healthcare Investors or its designated personnel provide oversight of a third party that performs the duties of a property manager with respect to such property; or (iii) a fair and reasonable property management fee that is approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, that is not less favorable to us than terms available from unaffiliated third parties for any property that is not a stand-alone, single-tenant, net leased property and for which American Healthcare Investors or its designated personnel directly serve as the property manager without sub-contracting such duties to a third party.
Property management fees are included in rental expenses or general and administrative expenses in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations, as applicable. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we incurred property management fees of $1,454,000, $1,220,000 and $746,000, respectively, to American Healthcare Investors.
Lease Fees
We pay our advisor or its affiliates a separate fee for any leasing activities in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm’s-length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties as determined by a survey of brokers and agents in such area. Such fee is generally expected to range from 3.0% to 6.0% of the gross revenues generated during the initial term of the lease.
Lease fees are capitalized as lease commissions, which are included in other assets, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets, and amortized over the term of the lease. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we incurred lease fees of $333,000, $83,000 and $94,000, respectively.
Construction Management Fee
In the event that our advisor or its affiliates assist with planning and coordinating the construction of any capital or tenant improvements, we pay our advisor or its affiliates a construction management fee of up to 5.0% of the cost of such improvements. Construction management fees are capitalized as part of the associated asset and included in real estate investments, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets or are expensed and included in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations, as applicable. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we incurred construction management fees of $99,000, $155,000 and $28,000, respectively.
Operating Expenses
We reimburse our advisor or its affiliates for operating expenses incurred in rendering services to us, subject to certain limitations. However, we cannot reimburse our advisor or its affiliates at the end of any fiscal quarter for total operating expenses that, in the 4 consecutive fiscal quarters then ended, exceed the greater of: (i) 2.0% of our average invested assets, as defined in the Advisory Agreement; or (ii) 25.0% of our net income, as defined in the Advisory Agreement, unless our
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
independent directors determined that such excess expenses were justified based on unusual and nonrecurring factors which they deem sufficient.
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, our operating expenses did not exceed the aforementioned limitations. The following table reflects our operating expenses as a percentage of average invested assets and as a percentage of net income for the 12 month periods then ended:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 12 months ended December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Operating expenses as a percentage of average invested assets | 1.2 | % | | 1.2 | % | | 1.2 | % |
| Operating expenses as a percentage of net income | 38.1 | % | | 37.2 | % | | 28.3 | % |
For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, our advisor incurred operating expenses on our behalf of $159,000, $132,000 and $65,000, respectively. Operating expenses are generally included in general and administrative in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Liquidity Stage
Disposition Fees
For services relating to the sale of one or more properties, we pay our advisor or its affiliates a disposition fee up to the lesser of 2.0% of the contract sales price or 50.0% of a customary competitive real estate commission given the circumstances surrounding the sale, in each case as determined by our board, including a majority of our independent directors, upon the provision of a substantial amount of the services in the sales effort. The amount of disposition fees paid, when added to the real estate commissions paid to unaffiliated parties, will not exceed the lesser of the customary competitive real estate commission or an amount equal to 6.0% of the contract sales price. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we did not incur any disposition fees to our advisor or its affiliates.
Subordinated Participation Interest
Subordinated Distribution of Net Sales Proceeds
In the event of liquidation, we will pay our advisor a subordinated distribution of net sales proceeds. The distribution will be equal to 15.0% of the remaining net proceeds from the sales of properties, after distributions to our stockholders, in the aggregate, of: (i) a full return of capital raised from stockholders (less amounts paid to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase plan); plus (ii) an annual 6.0% cumulative, non-compounded return on the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock, as adjusted for distributions of net sales proceeds. Actual amounts to be received depend on the sale prices of properties upon liquidation. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we did not pay any such distributions to our advisor.
Subordinated Distribution Upon Listing
Upon(c) the listing of shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange, or the Lock-Up Period; and (ii) the date on which we are eligible to file a registration statement (but in any event no later than 180 days after such date), we, as the indirect parent company of the Surviving Partnership, are required to file a shelf registration statement with the SEC under the Securities Act covering the resale of the shares of our Class I common stock issued or issuable in redemption of our advisor’s limited partnershipthe Surviving Partnership OP units we will pay our advisor a distribution equalthat the Surviving Partnership issued as consideration in the AHI Acquisition. The Registration Rights Agreement also grants HoldCo (or any successor holder of such shares) demand rights to 15.0%request additional registration statement filings as well as “piggyback” registration rights, in each case on or after the expiration of the amount by which: (i)Lock-Up Period. In connection with the market value of our outstanding common stock at listing plus distributions paid prior to listing exceeds (ii)Merger, we assumed from GAHR III the sum ofRegistration Rights Agreement and GAHR III’s obligations thereunder in their entirety. In connection with the total amount of capital raised from stockholders (less amounts paid to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase plan) and2024 Offering, the amount of cash equal to an annual 6.0% cumulative, non-compounded return onHolders (as defined in the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock through the date of listing. Actual amounts to be received depend upon the market value of our outstanding stock at the time of listing, among other factors. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we did not pay any such distributions to our advisor.
Subordinated Distribution Upon Termination
Pursuant to the Agreement of Limited Partnership, as amended, of our operating partnership upon termination or non-renewal of the Advisory Agreement, our advisor will also be entitled to a subordinated distribution in redemption of its limited partnership units from our operating partnership equal to 15.0% of the amount, if any, by which: (i) the appraised value of our assets on the termination date, less any indebtedness secured by such assets, plus total distributions paid through the termination date, exceeds (ii) the sum of the total amount of capital raised from stockholders (less amounts paid to repurchase shares of ourRegistration Rights
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
common stock pursuant to our share repurchase plan) andAgreement) have agreed that, without the total amountprior written consent of cash equal to an annual 6.0% cumulative, non-compounded returnthe representatives on behalf of the gross proceeds fromunderwriters of the sale2024 Offering, during the period ending 180 days after the date of shareslisting of our common stock through the termination date. In addition, our advisor may elect to defer its right to receive a subordinated distribution upon termination until either a listing or other liquidity event, including a liquidation, sale of substantially all of our assets or merger in which our stockholders receive in exchange for their shares of our common stock, shares of a company that are tradedtrading on a national securities exchange.
As of December 31, 2020exchange, they will not, and 2019, we didwill not have any liability relatedpublicly disclose an intention to, directly or indirectly, among others, subject to certain exceptions, exercise their registration rights under the subordinated distribution upon termination.
Stock Purchase Plans
On December 31, 2017, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, Jeffrey T. Hanson, our President and Chief Operating Officer, Danny Prosky, and our Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Mathieu B. Streiff, each executed stock purchase plans, or the 2018 Stock Purchase Plans, whereby they each irrevocably agreed to invest 100% of their net after-tax base salary and cash bonus compensation earned as employees of American Healthcare Investors directly into our company by purchasing shares of our Class I common stock. In addition, on December 31, 2017, the four Executive Vice Presidents of American Healthcare Investors at the time, including our Executive Vice President of Acquisitions, Stefan K.L. Oh, our Chief Financial Officer, Brian S. Peay, and Wendie Newman Vice President of Asset Management, each executed similar 2018 Stock Purchase Plans whereby they each irrevocably agreed to invest a portion of their net after-tax base salary or a portion of their net after-tax base salary and cash bonus compensation, ranging from 5.0% to 15.0%, earned on or after January 1, 2018 as employees of American Healthcare Investors directly into shares of our Class I common stock. The 2018 Stock Purchase Plans terminated on December 31, 2018.
Purchases of shares of our Class I common stock pursuant to the 2018 Stock Purchase Plans commenced beginning with the first regularly scheduled payroll payment on January 22, 2018, and concluded with the regularly scheduled payroll payment on January 7, 2019. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, our officers invested $34,000 and $1,078,000, respectively, and 3,346 and 113,658 shares of our Class I common stock, respectively, were issued in the aggregate pursuant to the 2018 Stock Purchase Plans. The shares of Class I common stock were purchased pursuant to the 2018 Stock Purchase Plans at a per share purchase price equal to the per share purchase price of our Class I common stock, which was $9.21 per share prior to April 11, 2018 and$9.65 per share effective as of April 11, 2018. No selling commissions, dealer manager fees (including the portion of such dealer manager fees funded by our advisor) or stockholder servicing fees were paid with respect to such sales of our Class I common stock pursuant to the 2018 Stock Purchase Plans.
Accounts Payable Due to Affiliates
The following amounts were outstanding to our affiliates as of December 31, 2020 and 2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | | |
| Fee | | 2020 | | 2019 | | |
| Asset management fees | | $ | 814,000 | | | $ | 768,000 | | | |
| Property management fees | | 117,000 | | | 145,000 | | | |
| Acquisition and development fees | | 64,000 | | | 5,000 | | | |
| Construction management fees | | 33,000 | | | 65,000 | | | |
| Operating expenses | | 10,000 | | | 12,000 | | | |
| Lease commissions | | 8,000 | | | 21,000 | | | |
| Total | | $ | 1,046,000 | | | $ | 1,016,000 | | | |
Registration Rights Agreement.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
14.15. Fair Value Measurements
Assets and Liabilities Reported at Fair Value
The table below presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2020,2023, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall:fall (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1) | | Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2) | | Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3) | | Total |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Assets: | | | | | | | |
| Derivative financial instrument | $ | — | | | $ | 1,463 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,463 | |
| Total assets at fair value | $ | — | | | $ | 1,463 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,463 | |
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| Derivative financial instruments | $ | — | | | $ | 2,389 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,389 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Total liabilities at fair value | $ | — | | | $ | 2,389 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,389 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1) | | Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2) | | Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3) | | Total |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| Derivative financial instruments | $ | 0 | | | $ | 5,255,000 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 5,255,000 | |
The table below presents ourWe did not have any assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2019, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1) | | Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2) | | Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3) | | Total |
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| Derivative financial instruments | $ | 0 | | | $ | 4,385,000 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 4,385,000 | |
2022. There were no transfers into orand out of fair value measurement levels during the years ended December 31, 20202023 and 2019.2022.
Warrants
As of December 31, 2023, we did not have any warrants outstanding. During the fourth quarter of 2022, we redeemed all the warrants in common units held by certain members of Trilogy’s management for $678,000 in cash, and as a result, we did not have any warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2022. Such warrants had redemption features similar to the common units held by members of Trilogy’s management. See Note 12, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests, for a further discussion.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We useentered into interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk associated with variable-rate debt. We also previously used interest rate caps to manage such interest rate risk. The valuation of these instruments iswas determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including a discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflectsSuch valuation reflected the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and usesused observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, as well as option volatility. The fair values of our interest rate swaps arewere determined by netting the discounted future fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The variable cash receipts arewere based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves.
We incorporateincorporated credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees.
Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivative financial instruments fallfell within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with these instruments utilizethis instrument utilized Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counterparty. However, as of December 31, 2020,2023, we have assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivative positions and have determined that the credit valuation adjustments arewere not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives. As a result, we have determined that our derivative valuations in their entirety arewere classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. On January 25, 2022, our prior interest rate swap contracts matured and as of December 31, 2022, we did not have any derivative financial instruments.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Financial Instruments Disclosed at Fair Value
Our accompanying consolidated balance sheets include the following financial instruments: debt security investment, cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts and other receivables, restricted cash, real estate deposits, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, accounts payable due to affiliates, mortgage loans payable and borrowings under the 2018 Credit Facility.our lines of credit and term loan.
We consider the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts and other receivables restricted cash, real estate deposits and accounts payable and accrued liabilities to approximate the fair valuesvalue for these financial instruments based upon
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
the underlying characteristics and market data, in light of the short period of time between origination of the instruments and their expected realization. The fair value of accounts payable due to affiliates is not determinable due to the related party naturevalues of the accounts payable. Theseother financial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, and thereforeinstruments are classified asin Level 1 in2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The fair value of our debt security investment is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis using interest rates available to us for investments with similar terms and maturities. The fair values of our mortgage loans payable and the 2018 Credit Facilityour lines of credit and term loan are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses using borrowing rates available to us for debt instruments with similar terms and maturities. We have determined that the valuations of our debt security investment, mortgage loans payable and the 2018 Credit Facilitylines of credit and term loan are classified in Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy as reliance is placed on inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, such as interest rates and yield curves.hierarchy. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of such financial instruments as of December 31, 20202023 and 20192022 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
| | Carrying
Amount(1) | | Fair
Value | | Carrying
Amount(1) | | Fair
Value |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Financial Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage loans payable | $ | 17,827,000 | | | $ | 22,052,000 | | | $ | 26,070,000 | | | $ | 26,677,000 | |
| Line of credit and term loans | $ | 475,176,000 | | | $ | 477,651,000 | | | $ | 393,217,000 | | | $ | 396,891,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 |
| | Carrying
Amount(1) | | Fair
Value | | Carrying
Amount(1) | | Fair
Value |
| Financial Assets: | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Debt security investment | $ | 86,935 | | | $ | 93,304 | | | $ | 83,000 | | | $ | 93,230 | |
| Financial Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage loans payable | $ | 1,302,396 | | | $ | 1,185,260 | | | $ | 1,229,847 | | | $ | 1,091,667 | |
| Lines of credit and term loan | $ | 1,220,137 | | | $ | 1,225,890 | | | $ | 1,277,460 | | | $ | 1,285,205 | |
___________
(1)Carrying amount is net of any discount/premium and unamortized deferred financing costs.
15.16. Income Taxes
As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on taxable income that we distribute to our stockholders. We have elected to treat certain of our consolidated subsidiaries as TRS pursuant to the Code. TRS may participate in services that would otherwise be considered impermissible for REITs and are subject to federal and state income tax at regular corporate tax rates.
On March 27, 2020,The components of income or loss before taxes for the federal government passed the CARES Act which contains economic stimulus provisions, including the temporary removalyears ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, were as follows (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Domestic | $ | (75,843) | | | $ | (72,510) | | | $ | (52,001) | |
| Foreign | (381) | | | (287) | | | (312) | |
| Loss before income taxes | $ | (76,224) | | | $ | (72,797) | | | $ | (52,313) | |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The components of income tax benefit or expense for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 20182021 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Federal deferred | $ | (3,336,000) | | | $ | (1,087,000) | | | $ | (2,593,000) | |
| State deferred | (1,097,000) | | | (100,000) | | | (675,000) | |
| Federal current | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| State current | 0 | | | (8,000) | | | 8,000 | |
| Valuation allowance | 4,433,000 | | | 1,187,000 | | | 3,268,000 | |
| Total income tax (benefit) expense | $ | 0 | | | $ | (8,000) | | | $ | 8,000 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Federal deferred | $ | (655) | | | $ | (8,176) | | | $ | (12,033) | |
| State deferred | 210 | | | (2,099) | | | (2,908) | |
| Federal current | 10 | | | — | | | — | |
| State current | (3) | | | — | | | 329 | |
| Foreign current | 656 | | | 586 | | | 627 | |
| Valuation allowances | 445 | | | 10,275 | | | 14,941 | |
| Total income tax expense | $ | 663 | | | $ | 586 | | | $ | 956 | |
Current Income Tax
Federal and state income taxes are generally a function of the level of income recognized by our TRS.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Deferred Taxes
Deferred income tax is generally a function of the period’s temporary differences (primarily basis differences between tax and financial reporting for real estate assets and equity investments) and generation of tax NOL that may be realized in future periods depending on sufficient taxable income.
We recognize the financial statement effects of an uncertain tax position on the financial statements, when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits of the tax position, that such a position will be sustained upon examination by the relevant tax authorities. If the tax benefit meets the “more likely than not” threshold, the measurement of the tax benefit will be based on our estimate of the ultimate tax benefit to be sustained if audited by the taxing authority. As of both December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, we did not have any tax benefits or liabilities for uncertain tax positions that we believe should be recognized in our accompanying consolidated financial statements.
We assess the available positive and negative evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to use the existing deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance is established if we believe it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets are not realizable. As of both December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, our valuation allowance fully reserves the net deferred tax assetassets due to historical losses and inherent uncertainty of future income. We will continue to monitor industry and economic conditions, and our ability to generate taxable income based on our business plan and available tax planning strategies, which would allow us to utilize the tax benefits of the net deferred tax assets and thereby allow us to reverse all, or a portion of, our valuation allowance in the future.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Any increases or decreases to the deferred income tax assets or liabilities are reflected in income tax (expense) benefit or expense in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.operations and comprehensive loss. The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 20202023 and 2019 was2022 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
| Deferred income tax assets: | | | |
| Fixed assets and intangibles | $ | 3,982,000 | | | $ | 2,455,000 | |
| Expense accruals and other | 1,076,000 | | | 620,000 | |
| Net operating loss | 4,306,000 | | | 1,856,000 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Valuation allowances | (9,364,000) | | | (4,931,000) | |
| Total deferred income tax assets | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 |
| Deferred income tax assets: | | | |
| Fixed assets and intangibles | $ | 7,297 | | | $ | 8,271 | |
| Expense accruals and other | 10,535 | | | 18,189 | |
| Net operating loss and other carry forwards | 57,011 | | | 50,101 | |
| Reserves and accruals | 8,119 | | | 7,487 | |
| Allowances for accounts receivable | 2,878 | | | 2,224 | |
| Investments in unconsolidated entities | 75 | | | — | |
| Total deferred income tax assets | $ | 85,915 | | | $ | 86,272 | |
| Deferred income tax liabilities: | | | |
| Fixed assets and intangibles | $ | (12,892) | | | $ | (13,626) | |
| Other — temporary differences | (2,608) | | | (2,676) | |
| Total deferred income tax liabilities | $ | (15,500) | | | $ | (16,302) | |
| | | |
| Net deferred income tax assets before valuation allowance | $ | 70,415 | | | $ | 69,970 | |
| Valuation allowances | (70,415) | | | (69,970) | |
| Net deferred income tax assets (liabilities) | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
At December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, we had a NOL carryforward of $16,158,000$203,320,000 and $7,179,000,$196,779,000, respectively, related to our TRS. These amounts can be used to offset future taxable income, if any. The NOL carryforwards that were incurred before January 1, 2018 will begin to expire in 2037 with respect to the TRS. Thestarting 2035, and NOL carryforwards incurred after December 31, 2017 will be carried forward indefinitely.
Tax Treatment of Distributions (Unaudited)
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, distributions to stockholders are characterized as ordinary income, capital gain distributions or nontaxable distributions. Nontaxable distributions will reduce United States stockholders’ basis (but not below zero) in their shares. The income tax treatment for distributions reportable for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 20182021 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Ordinary income | $ | 5,479,000 | | | 14.5 | % | | $ | 10,099,000 | | | 21.8 | % | | $ | 11,909,000 | | | 37.7 | % |
| Capital gain | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Return of capital | 32,193,000 | | | 85.5 | | | 36,317,000 | | | 78.2 | | | 19,673,000 | | | 62.3 | |
| $ | 37,672,000 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 46,416,000 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 31,582,000 | | | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Ordinary income | $ | 2,208 | | | 2.9 | % | | $ | 40,745 | | | 46.5 | % | | $ | 7,989 | | | 26.3 | % |
| Capital gain | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Return of capital | 73,614 | | | 97.1 | | | 46,890 | | | 53.5 | | | 22,406 | | | 73.7 | |
| $ | 75,822 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 87,635 | | | 100 | % | | $ | 30,395 | | | 100 | % |
Amounts listed above do not include distributions paid on nonvested shares of our restricted common stockRSAs and RSUs, which have been separately reported.
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
16.17. Leases
Lessor
We have operating leases with tenants that expire at various dates through 2040.2050. For the years ended December 31, 20202023, 2022 and 2019,2021, we recognized $86,321,000$185,064,000, $200,526,000 and $74,610,000$136,294,000, respectively, of real estate revenue, respectively,revenues related to operating lease payments, of which $18,372,000$38,415,000 and $14,878,000,$39,278,000, $23,340,000, respectively, was for variable lease payments. As of December 31, 2020,2023, the following table sets forth the undiscounted cash flows for future minimum base rents due under operating leases for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter for the properties that we wholly own:
| | | | | | | | |
| Year | | Amount |
| 2021 | | $ | 64,261,000 | |
| 2022 | | 61,691,000 | |
| 2023 | | 57,193,000 | |
| 2024 | | 51,590,000 | |
| 2025 | | 45,136,000 | |
| Thereafter | | 266,446,000 | |
| Total | | $ | 546,317,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Year | | Amount |
| 2024 | | $ | 134,438 | |
| 2025 | | 125,035 | |
| 2026 | | 115,544 | |
| 2027 | | 109,950 | |
| 2028 | | 98,546 | |
| Thereafter | | 466,484 | |
| Total | | $ | 1,049,997 | |
Lessee
We lease certain land, buildings, furniture, fixtures, campus and office equipment and automobiles. We have ground lease obligationsagreements with lease and non-lease components, which are generally accounted for separately. Most leases include one or more options to renew, with renewal terms that generally require fixed annual rental payments and may also include escalation clauses and renewal options. These leases expirecan extend at various dates through 2107, excluding extension options. The exercise of lease renewal options is at our sole discretion. Certain leases also include options to purchase the leased property.
The depreciable life of assets and leasehold improvements are limited by the expected lease term, unless there is a transfer of title or purchase option reasonably certain of exercise. Certain of our lease agreements include rental payments that are adjusted periodically based on the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price Index and may also include other variable lease costs (i.e., common area maintenance, property taxes and insurance). Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, operatingThe components of lease costs were $862,000as follows (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Years Ended December 31, |
| Lease Cost | | Classification | | | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Operating lease cost(1) | | Property operating expenses, rental expenses or general and administrative expenses | | | | $ | 44,141 | | | $ | 30,566 | | | $ | 23,774 | |
| Finance lease cost | | | | | | | | | | |
| Amortization of leased assets | | Depreciation and amortization | | | | 1,360 | | | 1,249 | | | 1,447 | |
| Interest on lease liabilities | | Interest expense | | | | 353 | | | 261 | | | 384 | |
| Sublease income | | Resident fees and services revenue or other income | | | | (572) | | | (693) | | | (210) | |
| Total lease cost | | | | | | $ | 45,282 | | | $ | 31,383 | | | $ | 25,395 | |
___________
(1)Includes short-term leases and $735,000, respectively, which are included in rental expenses in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Such costs also include variable lease costs, which are immaterial. Additional information related to our operating leases for the periods presented below was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Weighted average remaining lease term (in years) | | 79.5 | | 80.4 |
| Weighted average discount rate | | 5.74 | % | | 5.74 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities: | | | | |
| Operating cash outflows related to operating leases | | $ | 518,000 | | | $ | 458,000 | |
| Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 4,489,000 | |
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Additional information related to our leases for the periods presented below was as follows (dollars in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| Lease Term and Discount Rate | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Weighted average remaining lease term (in years) | | | | | | |
| Operating leases | | 12.2 | | 12.8 | | 16.9 |
| Finance leases | | 1.5 | | 2.3 | | 3.6 |
| Weighted average discount rate | | | | | | |
| Operating leases | | 5.76 | % | | 5.69 | % | | 5.52 | % |
| Finance leases | | 7.78 | % | | 7.66 | % | | 7.68 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flows Information | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2020 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Operating cash outflows related to finance leases | | $ | 353 | | | $ | 262 | | | $ | 384 | |
| Financing cash outflows related to finance leases | | $ | 62 | | | $ | 54 | | | $ | 170 | |
| | | | | | |
| Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities | | $ | 6,153 | | | $ | 173,832 | | | $ | 29,523 | |
Operating Leases
As of December 31, 2020,2023, the following table sets forth the undiscounted cash flows of our scheduled obligations for future minimum payments for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter, as well as the reconciliation of those cash flows to operating lease liabilities on our accompanying consolidated balance sheet:sheet (in thousands): | | | | | | | | |
| Year | | Amount |
| 2024 | | $ | 35,834 | |
| 2025 | | 35,153 | |
| 2026 | | 35,073 | |
| 2027 | | 35,618 | |
| 2028 | | 35,707 | |
| Thereafter | | 166,313 | |
| Total undiscounted operating lease payments | | 343,698 | |
| Less: interest | | 118,196 | |
| Present value of operating lease liabilities | | $ | 225,502 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Year | | Amount |
| 2021 | | $ | 523,000 | |
| 2022 | | 526,000 | |
| 2023 | | 530,000 | |
| 2024 | | 534,000 | |
| 2025 | | 538,000 | |
| Thereafter | | 46,565,000 | |
| Total operating lease payments | | 49,216,000 | |
| Less: interest | | 39,312,000 | |
| Present value of operating lease liabilities | | $ | 9,904,000 | |
17. Segment Reporting
As of December 31, 2020, we evaluated2023, the following table sets forth the undiscounted cash flows of our scheduled obligations for future minimum payments for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter, as well as a reconciliation of those cash flows to finance lease liabilities (in thousands): | | | | | | | | |
| Year | | Amount |
| 2024 | | $ | 76 | |
| 2025 | | 31 | |
| 2026 | | — | |
| 2027 | | — | |
| 2028 | | — | |
| Thereafter | | — | |
| Total undiscounted finance lease payments | | 107 | |
| Less: interest | | 7 | |
| Present value of finance lease liabilities | | $ | 100 | |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
18. Segment Reporting
We evaluate our business and mademake resource allocations based on 4four reportable business segments — medical office buildings,segments: integrated senior housing, senior housing — RIDEAhealth campuses, or ISHC, OM, triple-net leased properties and skilled nursing facilities.SHOP. Our medical officeOM buildings are typically leased to multiple tenants under separate leases, thus requiring active management and responsibility for many of the associated operating expenses (much of which are, or can effectively be, passed through to the tenants). Our integrated senior health campuses each provide a range of independent living, assisted living, memory care, skilled nursing services and certain ancillary businesses that are owned and operated utilizing a RIDEA structure. Our triple-net leased properties segment includes senior housing, and skilled nursing facilities and hospital investments, which are primarily single-tenant properties for which we lease the facilities to unaffiliated tenants under triple-net and generally master leases that transfer the obligation for all facility operating costs (including maintenance, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures) to the tenant. In addition, our triple-net leased properties segment includes our debt security investment. Our SHOP segment includes senior housing, — RIDEA properties include senior housing facilitieswhich may provide assisted living care, independent living, memory care or skilled nursing services that are owned and operated utilizing a RIDEA structure.
WeWhile we believe that net income (loss), as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measurement, we evaluate our segments’ performance based upon segment net operating income, or NOI. We define segment NOI as total revenues and grant income, less rentalproperty operating expenses and property operatingrental expenses, which excludes depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, business acquisition related expenses, interest expense, gain or loss on dispositions of real estate investments, impairment of real estate investments, impairment of intangible assets and goodwill, income or loss from unconsolidated entity,entities, gain on re-measurement of previously held equity interest, foreign currency gain or loss, other income and income tax benefit or expense for each segment. We believe that net income (loss), as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measurement. However, we believe that segment NOI serves as an appropriate supplemental performance measure to net income (loss) because it allows investors and our management to measure unlevered property-level operating results and to compare our operating results to the operating results of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis.
Interest expense, depreciation and amortization and other expenses not attributable to individual properties are not allocated to individual segments for purposes of assessing segment performance. Non-segment assets primarily consist of corporate assets, including our joint venture investment in an unconsolidated entity, cash and cash equivalents, other receivables, real estate depositsdeferred financing costs and other assets not attributable to individual properties.
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Summary information for the reportable segments during the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 20182021 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Medical
Office
Buildings | | Senior
Housing —
RIDEA | | Skilled
Nursing
Facilities | | Senior
Housing | | Year Ended
December 31, 2020 |
| Revenues and grant income: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate revenue | | $ | 65,509,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 11,968,000 | | | $ | 8,844,000 | | | $ | 86,321,000 | |
| Resident fees and services | | — | | | 67,793,000 | | | — | | | — | | | 67,793,000 | |
| Grant income | | — | | | 1,005,000 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,005,000 | |
| Total revenues and grant income | | 65,509,000 | | | 68,798,000 | | | 11,968,000 | | | 8,844,000 | | | 155,119,000 | |
| Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Rental expenses | | 22,068,000 | | | — | | | 576,000 | | | 806,000 | | | 23,450,000 | |
| Property operating expenses | | — | | | 60,224,000 | | | — | | | — | | | 60,224,000 | |
| Segment net operating income | | $ | 43,441,000 | | | $ | 8,574,000 | | | $ | 11,392,000 | | | $ | 8,038,000 | | | $ | 71,445,000 | |
| Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
| General and administrative | | | | | | | | | | $ | 16,691,000 | |
| Acquisition related expenses | | | | | | | | | | (160,000) | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | | | | 50,304,000 | |
| Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount/premium) | | (19,955,000) | |
| Loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments | | (870,000) | |
| Impairment of real estate investments | | (3,642,000) | |
| Income from unconsolidated entity | | | | | | | | | | 629,000 | |
| Other income | | | | | | | | | | 286,000 | |
| Net loss | | | | | | | | | | $ | (18,942,000) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Integrated
Senior Health
Campuses | | SHOP | | OM | | Triple-Net
Leased
Properties | | Year Ended December 31, 2023 |
| Revenues and grant income: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Resident fees and services | | $ | 1,481,880 | | | $ | 186,862 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,668,742 | |
| Real estate revenue | | — | | | — | | | 146,068 | | | 44,333 | | | 190,401 | |
| Grant income | | 7,475 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 7,475 | |
| Total revenues and grant income | | 1,489,355 | | | 186,862 | | | 146,068 | | | 44,333 | | | 1,866,618 | |
| Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Property operating expenses | | 1,335,817 | | | 166,493 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,502,310 | |
| Rental expenses | | — | | | — | | | 54,457 | | | 3,018 | | | 57,475 | |
| Segment net operating income | | $ | 153,538 | | | $ | 20,369 | | | $ | 91,611 | | | $ | 41,315 | | | $ | 306,833 | |
| Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
| General and administrative | | | | $ | 47,510 | |
| Business acquisition expenses | | | | 5,795 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 182,604 | |
| Other income (expense): | | | | |
| Interest expense: | |
| Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs, debt discount/premium and loss on debt extinguishments) | (163,191) | |
| Loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments | (926) | |
| Gain on dispositions of real estate investments | | | | 32,472 | |
| Impairment of real estate investments | (13,899) | |
| Impairment of intangible assets | | | | (10,520) | |
| Loss from unconsolidated entities | (1,718) | |
| Gain on re-measurement of previously held equity interest | | | | 726 | |
| Foreign currency gain | 2,307 | |
| Other income | | | | 7,601 | |
| Total net other expense | (147,148) | |
| Loss before income taxes | | | | (76,224) | |
| Income tax expense | | | | (663) | |
| Net loss | | | | | | | | | | $ | (76,887) | |
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
| | Medical
Office
Buildings | | Senior
Housing —
RIDEA | | Skilled
Nursing
Facilities | | Senior
Housing | | Year Ended
December 31, 2019 |
| Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Integrated
Senior Health
Campuses | | | | Integrated
Senior Health
Campuses | | SHOP | | OM | | Triple-Net
Leased
Properties | | Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
| Revenues and grant income: | |
| Resident fees and services | |
| Resident fees and services | |
| Resident fees and services | |
| Real estate revenue | Real estate revenue | | $ | 54,508,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 11,681,000 | | | $ | 8,421,000 | | | $ | 74,610,000 | |
| Resident fees and services | | — | | | 46,160,000 | | | — | | | — | | | 46,160,000 | |
| Total revenues | | 54,508,000 | | | 46,160,000 | | | 11,681,000 | | | 8,421,000 | | | 120,770,000 | |
| Grant income | |
| Total revenues and grant income | |
| Expenses: | Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Property operating expenses | |
| Property operating expenses | |
| Property operating expenses | |
| Rental expenses | Rental expenses | | 17,528,000 | | | — | | | 556,000 | | | 1,142,000 | | | 19,226,000 | |
| Property operating expenses | | — | | | 37,434,000 | | | — | | | — | | | 37,434,000 | |
| Segment net operating income | Segment net operating income | | $ | 36,980,000 | | | $ | 8,726,000 | | | $ | 11,125,000 | | | $ | 7,279,000 | | | $ | 64,110,000 | |
| Expenses: | Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
| General and administrative | General and administrative | | $ | 15,235,000 | |
| Acquisition related expenses | | 1,974,000 | |
| General and administrative | |
| General and administrative | |
| Business acquisition expenses | |
| Depreciation and amortization | Depreciation and amortization | | 45,626,000 | |
| Other income (expense): | Other income (expense): | |
| Interest expense: | Interest expense: | |
| Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount/premium) | | (16,191,000) | |
| Loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments | | (4,385,000) | |
| Income from unconsolidated entity | | 267,000 | |
| Interest expense: | |
| Interest expense: | |
| Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs, debt discount/premium and loss on debt extinguishments) | |
| Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs, debt discount/premium and loss on debt extinguishments) | |
| Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs, debt discount/premium and loss on debt extinguishments) | |
| Gain in fair value of derivative financial instruments | |
| Gain on dispositions of real estate investments | |
| Impairment of real estate investments | |
| Impairment of goodwill | |
| Income from unconsolidated entities | |
| Gain on re-measurement of previously held equity interest | |
| Foreign currency loss | |
| Other income | Other income | | 175,000 | |
| Total net other expense | |
| Loss before income taxes | Loss before income taxes | | (18,859,000) | |
| Income tax benefit | | 8,000 | |
| Income tax expense | |
| Net loss | Net loss | | $ | (18,851,000) | |
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
| | Medical
Office
Buildings | | Senior
Housing —
RIDEA | | Skilled
Nursing
Facilities | | Senior
Housing | | Year Ended
December 31, 2018 |
| Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Integrated
Senior Health
Campuses | | | | Integrated
Senior Health
Campuses | | SHOP | | OM | | Triple-Net
Leased
Properties | | Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
| Revenues and grant income: | |
| Resident fees and services | |
| Resident fees and services | |
| Resident fees and services | |
| Real estate revenue | Real estate revenue | | $ | 34,339,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,266,000 | | | $ | 8,994,000 | | | $ | 47,599,000 | |
| Resident fees and services | | — | | | 36,857,000 | | | — | | | — | | | 36,857,000 | |
| Total revenues | | 34,339,000 | | | 36,857,000 | | | 4,266,000 | | | 8,994,000 | | | 84,456,000 | |
| Grant income | |
| Total revenues and grant income | |
| Expenses: | Expenses: | |
| Property operating expenses | |
| Property operating expenses | |
| Property operating expenses | |
| Rental expenses | Rental expenses | | 9,934,000 | | | — | | | 351,000 | | | 1,214,000 | | | 11,499,000 | |
| Property operating expenses | | — | | | 30,023,000 | | | — | | | — | | | 30,023,000 | |
| Segment net operating income | Segment net operating income | | $ | 24,405,000 | | | $ | 6,834,000 | | | $ | 3,915,000 | | | $ | 7,780,000 | | | $ | 42,934,000 | |
| Expenses: | Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
| General and administrative | General and administrative | | $ | 9,172,000 | |
| Acquisition related expenses | | 2,795,000 | |
| General and administrative | |
| General and administrative | |
| Business acquisition expenses | |
| Depreciation and amortization | Depreciation and amortization | | 32,658,000 | |
| Other income (expense): | Other income (expense): | |
| Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount/premium) | | (6,788,000) | |
| Loss from unconsolidated entity | | (110,000) | |
| Interest expense: | |
| Interest expense: | |
| Interest expense: | |
| Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs, debt discount/premium and loss on debt extinguishments) | |
| Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs, debt discount/premium and loss on debt extinguishments) | |
| Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs, debt discount/premium and loss on debt extinguishments) | |
| Gain in fair value of derivative financial instruments | |
| Loss on dispositions of real estate investments | |
| Impairment of real estate investments | |
| Loss from unconsolidated entities | |
| Foreign currency loss | |
| Other income | Other income | | 11,000 | |
| Total net other expense | |
| Loss before income taxes | Loss before income taxes | | (8,578,000) | |
| Income tax expense | Income tax expense | | (8,000) | |
| Net loss | Net loss | | $ | (8,586,000) | |
AssetsTotal assets by reportable segment as of December 31, 20202023 and 20192022 were as follows:follows (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Integrated senior health campuses | $ | 2,197,762 | | | $ | 2,157,748 | |
| OM | 1,232,310 | | | 1,379,502 | |
| SHOP | 630,373 | | | 635,190 | |
| Triple-net leased properties | 502,836 | | | 601,360 | |
| Other | 14,652 | | | 12,898 | |
| Total assets | $ | 4,577,933 | | | $ | 4,786,698 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Medical office buildings | $ | 583,131,000 | | | $ | 600,048,000 | |
| Senior housing — RIDEA | 238,910,000 | | | 149,055,000 | |
| Skilled nursing | 119,247,000 | | | 121,749,000 | |
| Senior housing | 100,370,000 | | | 142,982,000 | |
| Other | 51,115,000 | | | 54,493,000 | |
| Total assets | $ | 1,092,773,000 | | | $ | 1,068,327,000 | |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
As of and for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, goodwill by reportable segment was as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Integrated
Senior Health
Campuses | | OM | | SHOP | | Triple-Net
Leased
Properties | | Total |
Balance — December 31, 2021 | | $ | 119,856 | | | $ | 47,812 | | | $ | 23,277 | | | $ | 18,953 | | | $ | 209,898 | |
| Goodwill acquired | | 44,990 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 44,990 | |
| Impairment loss | | — | | | — | | | (23,277) | | | — | | | (23,277) | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Balance — December 31, 2022 | | $ | 164,846 | | | $ | 47,812 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 18,953 | | | $ | 231,611 | |
| Goodwill acquired | | 3,331 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3,331 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Balance — December 31, 2023 | | $ | 168,177 | | | $ | 47,812 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 18,953 | | | $ | 234,942 | |
See Note 4, Business Combinations, for a further discussion of goodwill recognized in connection with our business combinations. During the year ended December 31, 2022, we performed the quantitative step one test of the goodwill impairment guidance for each of our reporting units in connection with our annual assessments of goodwill. The fair value of each reporting unit was determined based on various methodologies, including the income approach and the market approach models. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we determined that the fair value of the reporting unit under the SHOP reporting segment compared to its carrying value, including goodwill, was lower than its carrying value. As a result, goodwill pertaining to our SHOP reporting segment was fully impaired and we recognized an impairment loss of $23,277,000 in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2022. Therefore, as of December 31, 2022, we did not have any remaining goodwill associated with our SHOP reporting segment.
Our portfolio of properties and other investments are located in the United States, the UK and Isle of Man. Revenues and grant income and assets are attributed to the country in which the property is physically located. The following is a summary of geographic information for our operations for the periods presented (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Revenues and grant income: | | | | | | |
| United States | | $ | 1,861,954 | | | $ | 1,638,557 | | | $ | 1,277,095 | |
| International | | 4,664 | | | 4,618 | | | 5,159 | |
| | $ | 1,866,618 | | | $ | 1,643,175 | | | $ | 1,282,254 | |
The following is a summary of real estate investments, net by geographic regions as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Real estate investments, net: | | | |
| United States | $ | 3,382,115 | | | $ | 3,539,453 | |
| International | 43,323 | | | 42,156 | |
| $ | 3,425,438 | | | $ | 3,581,609 | |
18.19. Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to a concentration of credit risk are primarily our debt security investment, cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and accounts and other receivables, restricted cash and real estate deposits.receivables. We are exposed to credit risk with respect to our debt security investment, but we believe collection of the outstanding amount is probable. Cash and cash equivalents are generally invested in investment-grade, short-term instruments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. We have cash and cash equivalents in financial institutions that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC. As of December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, we had cash and cash equivalents in excess of FDIC insured limits. We believe this risk is not significant. Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable from tenants and residents is limited. In general, weWe perform credit evaluations of prospective tenants and security deposits are obtained at the time of property acquisition and upon lease execution.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Based on leases in effect as of December 31, 2020, 22023, properties in two states in the United States accounted for 10.0% or more of our total consolidated property portfolio’s annualized base rent or annualized NOI. OurNOI, which is based on contractual base rent from leases in effect for our non-RIDEA properties and annualized NOI for our SHOP and integrated senior health campuses as of December 31, 2023. Properties located in MissouriIndiana and Michigan accounted for approximately 12.1%35.3% and 10.1%10.4%, respectively, of our total consolidated property portfolio’s annualized base rent or annualized NOI. Accordingly, there is a geographic concentration of risk subject to fluctuations in each state’s economy.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Based on leases in effect as of December 31, 2020,2023, our 4four reportable business segments, medical office buildings, skilled nursing facilities,integrated senior housing — RIDEAhealth campuses, OM, triple-net leased properties and senior housingSHOP accounted for 65.0%51.0%, 14.4%28.7%, 10.5%11.5% and 10.1%8.8%, respectively, of our total consolidated property portfolio’s annualized base rent or annualized NOI. As of December 31, 2023, none of our tenants at our properties accounted for 10.0% or more of our total consolidated property portfolio’s annualized base rent or annualized NOI.
As of December 31, 2020, we had 1 tenant that accounted for 10.0% or more of our total property portfolio’s annualized base rent or annualized NOI, as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Tenant | | Annualized
Base Rent/
NOI(1) | | Percentage of
Annualized
Base Rent/NOI | | Acquisition | | Reportable
Segment | | GLA
(Sq Ft) | | Lease Expiration
Date |
| RC Tier Properties, LLC | | $ | 7,937,000 | | | 11.0% | | Missouri SNF Portfolio | | Skilled Nursing | | 385,000 | | 09/30/33 |
___________
(1)Amount is based on contractual base rent from leases in effect as of December 31, 2020, for our non–RIDEA properties and annualized NOI for our senior housing — RIDEA facilities. The loss of this tenant or its inability to pay rent could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
19.20. Per Share Data
Basic earnings (loss) per share for all periods presented are computed by dividing net income (loss) applicable to common stock by the weighted average number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the period. Net income (loss) applicable to common stock is calculated as net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest less distributions allocated to participating securities of $20,000, $24,000$3,803,000, $5,967,000 and $19,000$1,440,000, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018, respectively.2021. Diluted earnings (loss) per share are computed based on the weighted average number of shares of our common stock and all potentially dilutive securities, if any. NonvestedTBUs, nonvested shares of our restricted common stockRSAs and redeemable limited partnership units of our operating partnership are participating securities and give rise to potentially dilutive shares of our common stock.
As of December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, there were 45,000147,044 and 43,500183,240 nonvested shares, respectively, of our restricted common stockRSAs outstanding, but such shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because such shares were anti-dilutive during these periods. As of both December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, there were 208 redeemable3,501,976 limited partnership units of our operating partnership outstanding, but such units were also excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because such units were anti-dilutive during these periods. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, there were 157,329 and 19,200 nonvested TBUs outstanding, respectively, but such units were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because such restricted stock units were anti-dilutive during the period.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, there were 70,751 and 29,352 nonvested PBUs outstanding, respectively, which were treated as contingently issuable shares pursuant to ASC Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation. Such contingently issuable shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because they were anti-dilutive during the period.
21. Subsequent Events
Acquisition of Senior Housing Portfolio
On February 1, 2024, we acquired a portfolio of 12 senior housing facilities in Oregon from an unaffiliated third party, which facilities are included in our SHOP segment. These facilities are part of the underlying collateral pool of real estate assets securing our debt security investment. We acquired such 12 facilities by assuming the outstanding principal balance of each related mortgage loan payable from one of the borrowers. The aggregated principal balance of such assumed mortgage loans payable was $94,461,000 at the time of acquisition.
2024 Underwritten Public Offering and Listing
On February 9, 2024, pursuant to a Registration Statement filed with the SEC on Form S-11 (File No. 333-267464), as amended, we closed the 2024 Offering, through which we issued 64,400,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, for a total of $772,800,000 in gross offering proceeds. Such amounts include the exercise in full of the underwriters’ overallotment option to purchase up to an additional 8,400,000 shares of common stock. These shares are listed on New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “AHR” and began trading on February 7, 2024. We received $724,625,000 in net proceeds, which was primarily used to repay $176,145,000 of mortgage loans payable and $545,010,000 on our lines of credit in February 2024.
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
2024 Credit Facility
On February 14, 2024, we, through our operating partnership, as borrower, and certain of our subsidiaries, or the subsidiary guarantors, and our company, collectively as guarantors, entered into an agreement, or the 2024 Credit Agreement, that amends, restates, supersedes and replaces the 2022 Credit Agreement with Bank of America, KeyBank, Citizens Bank and a syndicate of other banks, as lenders, to obtain a credit facility with an aggregate maximum principal amount up to $1,150,000,000, or the 2024 Credit Facility. The 2024 Credit Facility consists of a senior unsecured revolving credit facility in the initial aggregate amount of $600,000,000 and a senior unsecured term loan facility in the initial aggregate amount of $550,000,000. Unless defined herein, all capitalized terms under this “2024 Credit Facility” subsection are defined in the 2024 Credit Agreement.
Under the terms of the 2024 Credit Agreement, the Revolving Loans mature on February 14, 2028, and may be extended for one 12-month period, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including payment of an extension fee. The Term Loan matures on January 19, 2027, and may not be extended. The maximum principal amount of the 2024 Credit Facility may be increased by an aggregate incremental amount of $600,000,000, subject to: (i) the terms of the 2024 Credit Agreement; and (ii) at least five business days’ prior written notice to Bank of America.
The 2024 Credit Facility bears interest at varying rates based upon, at our option, (i) Daily SOFR, plus the Applicable Rate for Daily SOFR Rate Loans or (ii) Term SOFR, plus the Applicable Rate for Term SOFR Rate Loans. If, under the terms of the 2024 Credit Agreement, there is an inability to determine the Daily SOFR or the Term SOFR, then the 2024 Credit Facility will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the Base Rate plus the Applicable Rate for Base Rate Loans. The loans may be repaid in whole or in part without prepayment premium or penalty, subject to certain conditions.
We are required to pay a fee on the unused portion of the lenders’ commitments under the 2024 Credit Agreement computed at (a) 0.25% per annum if the actual daily Commitment Utilization Percentage for such quarter is less than or equal to 50% and (b) 0.20% per annum if the actual daily Commitment Utilization Percentage for such quarter is greater than 50%, which fee shall be computed on the actual daily amount of the Available Commitments during the period for which payment is made and payable in arrears on a quarterly basis.
The 2024 Credit Agreement requires us to add additional subsidiaries as guarantors in the event the value of the assets owned by the subsidiary guarantors falls below a certain threshold as set forth in the 2024 Credit Agreement. In the event of default, Bank of America has the right to terminate the commitment of each Lender to make Loans and any obligation of the L/C Issuer to make L/C Credit Extensions under the 2024 Credit Agreement and to accelerate the payment on any unpaid principal amount of all outstanding loans and all interest accrued and unpaid thereon. The 2024 Credit Facility replaces the 2022 Credit Facility.
Distributions Declared
On March 13, 2024, our board authorized a quarterly distribution of $0.25 per share to all of our stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 28, 2024. The distribution for the quarter commencing January 1, 2024 to March 31, 2024, which will be paid on or about April 19, 2024, represents an annualized distribution rate of $1.00 per share.
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 20202023
(in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(e) | | | | |
| Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Total(d) | | Accumulated
Depreciation
(f)(g) | | Date of
Construction | | Date
Acquired |
| Auburn MOB (Medical Office) | Auburn, CA | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 406,000 | | | $ | 4,600,000 | | | $ | 230,000 | | | $ | 406,000 | | | $ | 4,830,000 | | | $ | 5,236,000 | | | $ | (740,000) | | | 1997 | | 06/28/16 |
| Pottsville MOB (Medical Office) | Pottsville, PA | | 0 | | | 1,493,000 | | | 7,050,000 | | | 118,000 | | | 1,493,000 | | | 7,168,000 | | | 8,661,000 | | | (1,232,000) | | | 2004 | | 09/16/16 |
| Charlottesville MOB (Medical Office) | Charlottesville, VA | | 0 | | | 4,768,000 | | | 13,330,000 | | | 83,000 | | | 4,768,000 | | | 13,413,000 | | | 18,181,000 | | | (2,098,000) | | | 2001 | | 09/22/16 |
| Rochester Hills MOB (Medical Office) | Rochester Hills, MI | | 2,805,000 | | | 1,727,000 | | | 5,763,000 | | | 284,000 | | | 1,727,000 | | | 6,047,000 | | | 7,774,000 | | | (1,036,000) | | | 1990 | | 09/29/16 |
| Cullman MOB III (Medical Office) | Cullman, AL | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 13,989,000 | | | 101,000 | | | 0 | | | 14,090,000 | | | 14,090,000 | | | (1,781,000) | | | 2010 | | 09/30/16 |
| Iron MOB Portfolio (Medical Office) | Cullman, AL | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 10,237,000 | | | 1,221,000 | | | 0 | | | 11,458,000 | | | 11,458,000 | | | (1,775,000) | | | 1994 | | 10/13/16 |
| Cullman, AL | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 6,906,000 | | | 1,203,000 | | | 0 | | | 8,109,000 | | | 8,109,000 | | | (1,222,000) | | | 1998 | | 10/13/16 |
| Sylacauga, AL | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 7,907,000 | | | 73,000 | | | 0 | | | 7,980,000 | | | 7,980,000 | | | (970,000) | | | 1997 | | 10/13/16 |
| Mint Hill MOB (Medical Office) | Mint Hill, NC | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 16,585,000 | | | 1,127,000 | | | 0 | | | 17,712,000 | | | 17,712,000 | | | (2,929,000) | | | 2007 | | 11/14/16 |
| Lafayette Assisted Living Portfolio (Senior Housing — RIDEA) | Lafayette, LA | | 0 | | | 1,327,000 | | | 8,225,000 | | | 217,000 | | | 1,327,000 | | | 8,442,000 | | | 9,769,000 | | | (979,000) | | | 1996 | | 12/01/16 |
| Lafayette, LA | | 0 | | | 980,000 | | | 4,244,000 | | | 18,000 | | | 980,000 | | | 4,262,000 | | | 5,242,000 | | | (520,000) | | | 2014 | | 12/01/16 |
| Evendale MOB (Medical Office) | Evendale, OH | | 0 | | | 1,620,000 | | | 7,583,000 | | | 848,000 | | | 1,620,000 | | | 8,431,000 | | | 10,051,000 | | | (1,412,000) | | | 1988 | | 12/13/16 |
| Battle Creek MOB (Medical Office) | Battle Creek, MI | | 0 | | | 960,000 | | | 5,717,000 | | | 429,000 | | | 960,000 | | | 6,146,000 | | | 7,106,000 | | | (1,064,000) | | | 1996 | | 03/10/17 |
| Reno MOB (Medical Office) | Reno, NV | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 64,718,000 | | | 906,000 | | | 0 | | | 65,624,000 | | | 65,624,000 | | | (6,984,000) | | | 2005 | | 03/13/17 |
| Athens MOB Portfolio (Medical Office) | Athens, GA | | 0 | | | 809,000 | | | 5,227,000 | | | 422,000 | | | 809,000 | | | 5,649,000 | | | 6,458,000 | | | (750,000) | | | 2006 | | 05/18/17 |
| Athens, GA | | 0 | | | 1,084,000 | | | 8,772,000 | | | 109,000 | | | 1,084,000 | | | 8,881,000 | | | 9,965,000 | | | (1,080,000) | | | 2006 | | 05/18/17 |
| SW Illinois Senior Housing Portfolio (Senior Housing) | Columbia, IL | | 0 | | | 1,086,000 | | | 9,651,000 | | | 3,000 | | | 1,086,000 | | | 9,654,000 | | | 10,740,000 | | | (1,225,000) | | | 2007 | | 05/22/17 |
| Columbia, IL | | 0 | | | 121,000 | | | 1,656,000 | | | 0 | | | 121,000 | | | 1,656,000 | | | 1,777,000 | | | (187,000) | | | 1999 | | 05/22/17 |
| Millstadt, IL | | 0 | | | 203,000 | | | 3,827,000 | | | 0 | | | 203,000 | | | 3,827,000 | | | 4,030,000 | | | (419,000) | | | 2004 | | 05/22/17 |
| Red Bud, IL | | 0 | | | 198,000 | | | 3,553,000 | | | 51,000 | | | 198,000 | | | 3,604,000 | | | 3,802,000 | | | (406,000) | | | 2006 | | 05/22/17 |
| Waterloo, IL | | 0 | | | 470,000 | | | 8,369,000 | | | 0 | | | 470,000 | | | 8,369,000 | | | 8,839,000 | | | (883,000) | | | 2012 | | 05/22/17 |
| Lawrenceville MOB (Medical Office) | Lawrenceville, GA | | 0 | | | 1,363,000 | | | 9,099,000 | | | 5,000 | | | 1,363,000 | | | 9,104,000 | | | 10,467,000 | | | (1,218,000) | | | 2005 | | 06/12/17 |
| Northern California Senior Housing Portfolio (Senior Housing — RIDEA) | Belmont, CA | | 0 | | | 10,760,000 | | | 13,631,000 | | | (226,000) | | | 10,760,000 | | | 13,405,000 | | | 24,165,000 | | | (1,338,000) | | | 1958/2000 | | 06/28/17 |
| Fairfield, CA | | 0 | | | 317,000 | | | 6,584,000 | | | (2,214,000) | | (c) | 317,000 | | | 4,370,000 | | | 4,687,000 | | | (666,000) | | | 1974 | | 06/28/17 |
| Menlo Park, CA | | 0 | | | 5,188,000 | | | 2,177,000 | | | (51,000) | | | 5,188,000 | | | 2,126,000 | | | 7,314,000 | | | (206,000) | | | 1945 | | 06/28/17 |
| Sacramento, CA | | 0 | | | 1,266,000 | | | 2,818,000 | | | (1,438,000) | | (c) | 1,266,000 | | | 1,380,000 | | | 2,646,000 | | | (301,000) | | | 1978 | | 06/28/17 |
| Roseburg MOB (Medical Office) | Roseburg, OR | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 20,925,000 | | | 34,000 | | | 0 | | | 20,959,000 | | | 20,959,000 | | | (2,313,000) | | | 2003 | | 06/29/17 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land and Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(b) | | Land and
Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated
Depreciation
(g)(h) | | Date of
Construction | | Date
Acquired |
| Wichita KS OM (Outpatient Medical) | Wichita, KS | | $ | — | | | $ | 943 | | | $ | 6,288 | | | $ | 812 | | | $ | 943 | | | $ | 7,100 | | | $ | 8,043 | | | $ | (2,316) | | | 1980/1996 | | 09/04/14 |
| Delta Valley ALF Portfolio (SHOP) | Batesville, MS | | — | | | 331 | | | 5,103 | | | (335) | | | 331 | | | 4,768 | | | 5,099 | | | (1,295) | | | 1999/2005 | | 09/11/14 |
| Cleveland, MS | | — | | | 348 | | | 6,369 | | | (921) | | | 355 | | | 5,441 | | | 5,796 | | | (1,460) | | | 2004 | | 09/11/14 |
| Springdale, AR | | — | | | 891 | | | 6,538 | | | (705) | | | 891 | | | 5,833 | | | 6,724 | | | (1,502) | | | 1998/2005 | | 01/08/15 |
| Lee’s Summit MO OM (Outpatient Medical) | Lee’s Summit, MO | | — | | | 1,045 | | | 5,068 | | | 1,530 | | | 1,045 | | | 6,598 | | | 7,643 | | | (2,190) | | | 2006 | | 09/18/14 |
| Carolina Commons OM (Outpatient Medical) | Indian Land, SC | | — | | | 1,028 | | | 9,430 | | | 4,931 | | | 1,028 | | | 14,361 | | | 15,389 | | | (4,378) | | | 2009 | | 10/15/14 |
| Mount Olympia OM Portfolio (Outpatient Medical) | Mount Dora, FL | | — | | | 393 | | | 5,633 | | | — | | | 393 | | | 5,633 | | | 6,026 | | | (1,576) | | | 2009 | | 12/04/14 |
| Southlake TX Hospital (Hospital) | Southlake, TX | | 91,601 | | | 5,089 | | | 108,517 | | | — | | | 5,089 | | | 108,517 | | | 113,606 | | | (26,425) | | | 2013 | | 12/04/14 |
| East Texas OM Portfolio (Outpatient Medical) | Longview, TX | | — | | | — | | | 19,942 | | | 9,079 | | | — | | | 29,021 | | | 29,021 | | | (6,397) | | | 2008 | | 12/12/14 |
| Longview, TX | | — | | | 759 | | | 1,696 | | | 140 | | | 759 | | | 1,836 | | | 2,595 | | | (912) | | | 1998 | | 12/12/14 |
| Longview, TX | | — | | | — | | | 8,027 | | | 1 | | | — | | | 8,028 | | | 8,028 | | | (2,489) | | | 2004 | | 12/12/14 |
| Longview, TX | | — | | | — | | | 696 | | | 41 | | | — | | | 737 | | | 737 | | | (335) | | | 1956 | | 12/12/14 |
| Longview, TX | | — | | | — | | | 27,601 | | | 5,494 | | | — | | | 33,095 | | | 33,095 | | | (10,359) | | | 1985/1993/ 2004 | | 12/12/14 |
| Marshall, TX | | — | | | 368 | | | 1,711 | | | 110 | | | 368 | | | 1,821 | | | 2,189 | | | (856) | | | 1970 | | 12/12/14 |
| Premier OM (Outpatient Medical) | Novi, MI | | — | | | 644 | | | 10,420 | | | 2,031 | | | 644 | | | 12,451 | | | 13,095 | | | (3,808) | | | 2006 | | 12/19/14 |
| Independence OM Portfolio (Outpatient Medical) | Southgate, KY | | — | | | 411 | | | 11,005 | | | 2,530 | | | 411 | | | 13,535 | | | 13,946 | | | (4,112) | | | 1988 | | 01/13/15 |
| Somerville, MA | | 28,474 | | | 1,509 | | | 46,775 | | | 6,500 | | | 1,509 | | | 53,275 | | | 54,784 | | | (12,866) | | | 1985 | | 01/13/15 |
| Verona, NJ | | — | | | 1,683 | | | 9,405 | | | 2,409 | | | 1,683 | | | 11,814 | | | 13,497 | | | (3,175) | | | 1970 | | 01/13/15 |
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 20202023
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(e) | | | | |
| Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Total(d) | | Accumulated
Depreciation
(f)(g) | | Date of
Construction | | Date
Acquired |
| Fairfield County MOB Portfolio (Medical Office) | Stratford, CT | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,011,000 | | | $ | 3,538,000 | | | $ | 356,000 | | | $ | 1,011,000 | | | $ | 3,894,000 | | | $ | 4,905,000 | | | $ | (681,000) | | | 1963 | | 09/29/17 |
| Trumbull, CT | | 0 | | | 2,250,000 | | | 6,879,000 | | | 692,000 | | | 2,250,000 | | | 7,571,000 | | | 9,821,000 | | | (1,048,000) | | | 1987 | | 09/29/17 |
| Central Florida Senior Housing Portfolio (Senior Housing — RIDEA) | Bradenton, FL | | 0 | | | 1,058,000 | | | 5,118,000 | | | 518,000 | | | 1,058,000 | | | 5,636,000 | | | 6,694,000 | | | (687,000) | | | 1973/1983 | | 11/01/17 |
| Brooksville, FL | | 0 | | | 1,377,000 | | | 10,217,000 | | | 844,000 | | | 1,378,000 | | | 11,060,000 | | | 12,438,000 | | | (1,657,000) | | | 1960/2007 | | 11/01/17 |
| Brooksville, FL | | 0 | | | 934,000 | | | 6,550,000 | | | 559,000 | | | 934,000 | | | 7,109,000 | | | 8,043,000 | | | (867,000) | | | 2008 | | 11/01/17 |
| Lake Placid, FL | | 0 | | | 949,000 | | | 3,476,000 | | | 178,000 | | | 950,000 | | | 3,653,000 | | | 4,603,000 | | | (487,000) | | | 2008 | | 11/01/17 |
| Lakeland, FL | | 0 | | | 528,000 | | | 17,541,000 | | | 757,000 | | | 529,000 | | | 18,297,000 | | | 18,826,000 | | | (1,671,000) | | | 1985 | | 11/01/17 |
| Pinellas Park, FL | | 0 | | | 1,118,000 | | | 9,005,000 | | | 40,000 | | | 1,118,000 | | | 9,045,000 | | | 10,163,000 | | | (877,000) | | | 2016 | | 11/01/17 |
| Sanford, FL | | 0 | | | 2,782,000 | | | 10,019,000 | | | 994,000 | | | 2,783,000 | | | 11,012,000 | | | 13,795,000 | | | (1,278,000) | | | 1984 | | 11/01/17 |
| Spring Hill, FL | | 0 | | | 930,000 | | | 6,241,000 | | | 2,475,000 | | | 930,000 | | | 8,716,000 | | | 9,646,000 | | | (1,506,000) | | | 1988 | | 11/01/17 |
| Winter Haven, FL | | 0 | | | 3,118,000 | | | 21,973,000 | | | 516,000 | | | 3,119,000 | | | 22,488,000 | | | 25,607,000 | | | (2,629,000) | | | 1984 | | 11/01/17 |
| Central Wisconsin Senior Care Portfolio (Skilled Nursing) | Sun Prairie, WI | | 0 | | | 587,000 | | | 3,487,000 | | | 2,000 | | | 587,000 | | | 3,489,000 | | | 4,076,000 | | | (346,000) | | | 1960/2006 | | 03/01/18 |
| Waunakee, WI | | 0 | | | 1,930,000 | | | 14,352,000 | | | 660,000 | | | 1,930,000 | | | 15,012,000 | | | 16,942,000 | | | (1,460,000) | | | 1974/2005 | | 03/01/18 |
| Sauk Prairie MOB (Medical Office) | Prairie du Sac, WI | | 0 | | | 2,154,000 | | | 15,194,000 | | | 35,000 | | | 2,154,000 | | | 15,229,000 | | | 17,383,000 | | | (1,579,000) | | | 2014 | | 04/09/18 |
| Surprise MOB (Medical Office) | Surprise, AZ | | 0 | | | 1,759,000 | | | 9,037,000 | | | 329,000 | | | 1,759,000 | | | 9,366,000 | | | 11,125,000 | | | (923,000) | | | 2012 | | 04/27/18 |
| Southfield MOB (Medical Office) | Southfield, MI | | 5,782,000 | | | 1,639,000 | | | 12,907,000 | | | 395,000 | | | 1,639,000 | | | 13,302,000 | | | 14,941,000 | | | (1,377,000) | | | 1975/2014 | | 05/11/18 |
| Pinnacle Beaumont ALF (Senior Housing — RIDEA) | Beaumont, TX | | 0 | | | 1,586,000 | | | 17,483,000 | | | 67,000 | | | 1,586,000 | | | 17,550,000 | | | 19,136,000 | | | (1,245,000) | | | 2012 | | 07/01/18 |
| Grand Junction MOB (Medical Office) | Grand Junction, CO | | 0 | | | 1,315,000 | | | 27,528,000 | | | 3,000 | | | 1,315,000 | | | 27,531,000 | | | 28,846,000 | | | (2,153,000) | | | 2013 | | 07/06/18 |
| Edmonds MOB (Medical Office) | Edmonds, WA | | 0 | | | 4,167,000 | | | 16,770,000 | | | 361,000 | | | 4,167,000 | | | 17,131,000 | | | 21,298,000 | | | (1,313,000) | | | 1991/2008 | | 07/30/18 |
| Pinnacle Warrenton ALF (Senior Housing — RIDEA) | Warrenton, MO | | 0 | | | 462,000 | | | 7,125,000 | | | 540,000 | | | 462,000 | | | 7,665,000 | | | 8,127,000 | | | (609,000) | | | 1986 | | 08/01/18 |
| Glendale MOB (Medical Office) | Glendale, WI | | 0 | | | 794,000 | | | 5,541,000 | | | 551,000 | | | 794,000 | | | 6,092,000 | | | 6,886,000 | | | (684,000) | | | 2004 | | 08/13/18 |
| Missouri SNF Portfolio (Skilled Nursing) | Florissant, MO | | 0 | | | 1,064,000 | | | 9,301,000 | | | 0 | | | 1,064,000 | | | 9,301,000 | | | 10,365,000 | | | (697,000) | | | 1987 | | 09/28/18 |
| Kansas City, MO | | 0 | | | 1,710,000 | | | 10,699,000 | | | 0 | | | 1,710,000 | | | 10,699,000 | | | 12,409,000 | | | (873,000) | | | 1974 | | 09/28/18 |
| Milan, MO | | 0 | | | 181,000 | | | 5,972,000 | | | 0 | | | 181,000 | | | 5,972,000 | | | 6,153,000 | | | (435,000) | | | 1980 | | 09/28/18 |
| Missouri, MO | | 0 | | | 473,000 | | | 9,856,000 | | | 0 | | | 473,000 | | | 9,856,000 | | | 10,329,000 | | | (699,000) | | | 1963 | | 09/28/18 |
| Salisbury, MO | | 0 | | | 252,000 | | | 7,581,000 | | | 0 | | | 252,000 | | | 7,581,000 | | | 7,833,000 | | | (549,000) | | | 1970 | | 09/28/18 |
| Sedalia, MO | | 0 | | | 266,000 | | | 22,397,000 | | | 0 | | | 266,000 | | | 22,397,000 | | | 22,663,000 | | | (1,429,000) | | | 1975 | | 09/28/18 |
| St. Elizabeth, MO | | 0 | | | 329,000 | | | 4,282,000 | | | 0 | | | 329,000 | | | 4,282,000 | | | 4,611,000 | | | (320,000) | | | 1981 | | 09/28/18 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land and Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(b) | | Land and
Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated
Depreciation
(g)(h) | | Date of
Construction | | Date
Acquired |
| Bronx, NY | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 19,593 | | | $ | 3,403 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 22,996 | | | $ | 22,996 | | | $ | (6,098) | | | 1987/1988 | | 01/26/15 |
| King of Prussia PA OM (Outpatient Medical) | King of Prussia, PA | | — | | | 3,427 | | | 13,849 | | | 6,305 | | | 3,427 | | | 20,154 | | | 23,581 | | | (6,232) | | | 1946/2000 | | 01/21/15 |
| North Carolina ALF Portfolio (SHOP) | Clemmons, NC | | — | | | 596 | | | 13,237 | | | (412) | | | 596 | | | 12,825 | | | 13,421 | | | (3,296) | | | 2014 | | 06/29/15 |
| Garner, NC | | — | | | 1,723 | | | 11,517 | | | 196 | | | 1,723 | | | 11,713 | | | 13,436 | | | (1,988) | | | 2014 | | 03/27/19 |
| Huntersville, NC | | — | | | 2,033 | | | 11,494 | | | 95 | | | 2,033 | | | 11,589 | | | 13,622 | | | (2,573) | | | 2015 | | 01/18/17 |
| Matthews, NC | | — | | | 949 | | | 12,537 | | | (5) | | | 949 | | | 12,532 | | | 13,481 | | | (2,248) | | | 2017 | | 08/30/18 |
| Mooresville, NC | | — | | | 835 | | | 15,894 | | | (350) | | | 835 | | | 15,544 | | | 16,379 | | | (3,945) | | | 2012 | | 01/28/15 |
| Raleigh, NC | | — | | | 1,069 | | | 21,235 | | | (429) | | | 1,069 | | | 20,806 | | | 21,875 | | | (5,036) | | | 2013 | | 01/28/15 |
| Wake Forest, NC | | — | | | 772 | | | 13,596 | | | (432) | | | 772 | | | 13,164 | | | 13,936 | | | (3,144) | | | 2014 | | 06/29/15 |
| Orange Star Medical Portfolio (Outpatient Medical and Hospital) | Durango, CO | | — | | | 623 | | | 14,166 | | | 483 | | | 623 | | | 14,649 | | | 15,272 | | | (3,664) | | | 2004 | | 02/26/15 |
| Durango, CO | | — | | | 788 | | | 10,467 | | | 1,242 | | | 788 | | | 11,709 | | | 12,497 | | | (3,059) | | | 2004 | | 02/26/15 |
| Friendswood, TX | | — | | | 500 | | | 7,664 | | | 1,114 | | | 500 | | | 8,778 | | | 9,278 | | | (2,338) | | | 2008 | | 02/26/15 |
| Keller, TX | | — | | | 1,604 | | | 7,912 | | | 873 | | | 1,604 | | | 8,785 | | | 10,389 | | | (2,453) | | | 2011 | | 02/26/15 |
| Wharton, TX | | — | | | 259 | | | 10,590 | | | 3,543 | | | 259 | | | 14,133 | | | 14,392 | | | (2,978) | | | 1987 | | 02/26/15 |
| Kingwood OM Portfolio (Outpatient Medical) | Kingwood, TX | | — | | | 820 | | | 8,589 | | | 526 | | | 820 | | | 9,115 | | | 9,935 | | | (2,475) | | | 2005 | | 03/11/15 |
| Kingwood, TX | | — | | | 781 | | | 3,943 | | | 64 | | | 781 | | | 4,007 | | | 4,788 | | | (1,137) | | | 2008 | | 03/11/15 |
| Mt Juliet TN OM (Outpatient Medical) | Mount Juliet, TN | | — | | | 1,188 | | | 10,720 | | | 516 | | | 1,188 | | | 11,236 | | | 12,424 | | | (2,893) | | | 2012 | | 03/17/15 |
| Homewood AL OM (Outpatient Medical) | Homewood, AL | | — | | | 405 | | | 6,590 | | | (665) | | | 405 | | | 5,925 | | | 6,330 | | | (1,961) | | | 2010 | | 03/27/15 |
| Paoli PA Medical Plaza (Outpatient Medical) | Paoli, PA | | — | | | 2,313 | | | 12,447 | | | 8,809 | | | 2,313 | | | 21,256 | | | 23,569 | | | (6,149) | | | 1951 | | 04/10/15 |
| Paoli, PA | | — | | | 1,668 | | | 7,357 | | | 2,193 | | | 1,668 | | | 9,550 | | | 11,218 | | | (3,123) | | | 1975 | | 04/10/15 |
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 20202023
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(e) | | | | |
| Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Total(d) | | Accumulated
Depreciation
(f)(g) | | Date of
Construction | | Date
Acquired |
| Trenton, MO | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 122,000 | | | $ | 4,507,000 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 122,000 | | | $ | 4,507,000 | | | $ | 4,629,000 | | | $ | (318,000) | | | 1967 | | 09/28/18 |
| Flemington MOB Portfolio (Medical Office) | Flemington, NJ | | 0 | | | 1,473,000 | | | 10,728,000 | | | 161,000 | | | 1,473,000 | | | 10,889,000 | | | 12,362,000 | | | (805,000) | | | 2002 | | 11/29/18 |
| Flemington, NJ | | 0 | | | 586,000 | | | 2,949,000 | | | 51,000 | | | 586,000 | | | 3,000,000 | | | 3,586,000 | | | (258,000) | | | 1993 | | 11/29/18 |
| Lawrenceville MOB II (Medical Office) | Lawrenceville, GA | | 0 | | | 1,000,000 | | | 7,737,000 | | | 305,000 | | | 1,000,000 | | | 8,042,000 | | | 9,042,000 | | | (714,000) | | | 1990 | | 12/19/18 |
| Mill Creek MOB (Medical Office) | Mill Creek, WA | | 0 | | | 1,453,000 | | | 5,935,000 | | | 8,000 | | | 1,453,000 | | | 5,943,000 | | | 7,396,000 | | | (396,000) | | | 1991 | | 12/21/18 |
| Modesto MOB (Medical Office) | Modesto, CA | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 12,789,000 | | | 471,000 | | | 0 | | | 13,260,000 | | | 13,260,000 | | | (898,000) | | | 1991/2016 | | 12/28/18 |
| Michigan ALF Portfolio (Senior Housing) | Grand Rapids, MI | | 0 | | | 1,334,000 | | | 8,422,000 | | | 1,000 | | | 1,334,000 | | | 8,423,000 | | | 9,757,000 | | | (496,000) | | | 1953/2016 | | 12/28/18 |
| Grand Rapids, MI | | 10,179,000 | | | 1,382,000 | | | 10,740,000 | | | 1,000 | | | 1,382,000 | | | 10,741,000 | | | 12,123,000 | | | (587,000) | | | 1989 | | 05/01/19 |
| Holland, MI | | 0 | | | 799,000 | | | 6,984,000 | | | 3,000 | | | 799,000 | | | 6,987,000 | | | 7,786,000 | | | (477,000) | | | 2007/2017 | | 12/28/18 |
| Howell, MI | | 0 | | | 728,000 | | | 5,404,000 | | | 1,000 | | | 728,000 | | | 5,405,000 | | | 6,133,000 | | | (326,000) | | | 2003 | | 12/28/18 |
| Lansing, MI | | 0 | | | 1,175,000 | | | 12,052,000 | | | 2,000 | | | 1,175,000 | | | 12,054,000 | | | 13,229,000 | | | (689,000) | | | 1988/2015 | | 12/28/18 |
| Wyoming, MI | | 0 | | | 1,542,000 | | | 12,873,000 | | | 2,000 | | | 1,542,000 | | | 12,875,000 | | | 14,417,000 | | | (746,000) | | | 1964/2016 | | 12/28/18 |
| Lithonia MOB (Medical Office) | Lithonia, GA | | 0 | | | 1,129,000 | | | 8,842,000 | | | 15,000 | | | 1,129,000 | | | 8,857,000 | | | 9,986,000 | | | (667,000) | | | 2015 | | 03/05/19 |
| West Des Moines SNF (Skilled Nursing) | West Des Moines, IA | | 0 | | | 672,000 | | | 5,753,000 | | | 0 | | | 672,000 | | | 5,753,000 | | | 6,425,000 | | | (318,000) | | | 2004 | | 03/24/19 |
| Great Nord MOB Portfolio (Medical Office) | Tinley Park, IL | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 12,976,000 | | | 16,000 | | | 0 | | | 12,992,000 | | | 12,992,000 | | | (845,000) | | | 2002 | | 04/08/19 |
| Chesterton, IN | | 0 | | | 539,000 | | | 8,937,000 | | | 46,000 | | | 540,000 | | | 8,982,000 | | | 9,522,000 | | | (545,000) | | | 2007 | | 04/08/19 |
| Crown Point, IN | | 0 | | | 283,000 | | | 4,882,000 | | | 0 | | | 283,000 | | | 4,882,000 | | | 5,165,000 | | | (289,000) | | | 2005 | | 04/08/19 |
| Plymouth, MN | | 0 | | | 1,452,000 | | | 11,126,000 | | | 0 | | | 1,451,000 | | | 11,127,000 | | | 12,578,000 | | | (619,000) | | | 2014 | | 04/08/19 |
| Overland Park MOB (Medical Office) | Overland Park, KS | | 0 | | | 2,437,000 | | | 23,169,000 | | | 4,243,000 | | | 2,437,000 | | | 27,412,000 | | | 29,849,000 | | | (1,194,000) | | | 2017 | | 08/05/19 |
| Blue Badger MOB (Medical Office) | Marysville, OH | | 0 | | | 1,838,000 | | | 10,646,000 | | | 1,000 | | | 1,838,000 | | | 10,647,000 | | | 12,485,000 | | | (481,000) | | | 2014 | | 08/09/19 |
| Bloomington MOB (Medical Office) | Bloomington, IL | | 0 | | | 3,178,000 | | | 13,547,000 | | | 67,000 | | | 3,179,000 | | | 13,613,000 | | | 16,792,000 | | | (580,000) | | | 1990 | | 08/13/19 |
| Memphis MOB (Medical Office) | Memphis, TN | | 0 | | | 1,210,000 | | | 6,775,000 | | | 0 | | | 1,209,000 | | | 6,776,000 | | | 7,985,000 | | | (312,000) | | | 1984 | | 08/15/19 |
| Haverhill MOB (Medical Office) | Haverhill, MA | | 0 | | | 1,620,000 | | | 12,537,000 | | | 0 | | | 1,620,000 | | | 12,537,000 | | | 14,157,000 | | | (522,000) | | | 1987 | | 08/27/19 |
| Fresno MOB (Medical Office) | Fresno, CA | | 0 | | | 1,412,000 | | | 8,155,000 | | | 1,000 | | | 1,412,000 | | | 8,156,000 | | | 9,568,000 | | | (379,000) | | | 2007 | | 10/30/19 |
| Colorado Foothills MOB Portfolio (Medical Office) | Arvada, CO | | 0 | | | 720,000 | | | 4,615,000 | | | 223,000 | | | 720,000 | | | 4,838,000 | | | 5,558,000 | | | (255,000) | | | 1979 | | 11/19/19 |
| Centennial, CO | | 0 | | | 970,000 | | | 10,307,000 | | | 70,000 | | | 970,000 | | | 10,377,000 | | | 11,347,000 | | | (425,000) | | | 1979 | | 11/19/19 |
| Colorado Springs, CO | | 0 | | | 1,443,000 | | | 11,123,000 | | | 93,000 | | | 1,443,000 | | | 11,216,000 | | | 12,659,000 | | | (545,000) | | | 1999 | | 11/19/19 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land and Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(b) | | Land and
Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated
Depreciation
(g)(h) | | Date of
Construction | | Date
Acquired |
| Glen Burnie MD OM (Outpatient Medical) | Glen Burnie, MD | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,692 | | | $ | 14,095 | | | $ | 4,289 | | | $ | 2,692 | | | $ | 18,384 | | | $ | 21,076 | | | $ | (5,666) | | | 1981 | | 05/06/15 |
| Marietta GA OM (Outpatient Medical) | Marietta, GA | | — | | | 1,347 | | | 10,947 | | | 749 | | | 1,347 | | | 11,696 | | | 13,043 | | | (2,992) | | | 2002 | | 05/07/15 |
| Mountain Crest Senior Housing Portfolio (SHOP) | Elkhart, IN | | — | | | 793 | | | 6,009 | | | 682 | | | 793 | | | 6,691 | | | 7,484 | | | (1,960) | | | 1997 | | 05/14/15 |
| Elkhart, IN | | — | | | 782 | | | 6,760 | | | 819 | | | 782 | | | 7,579 | | | 8,361 | | | (2,346) | | | 2000 | | 05/14/15 |
| Hobart, IN | | — | | | 604 | | | 11,529 | | | (799) | | | — | | | 11,334 | | | 11,334 | | | (3,180) | | | 2008 | | 05/14/15 |
| LaPorte, IN | | — | | | 392 | | | 14,894 | | | (6,101) | | | — | | | 9,185 | | | 9,185 | | | (4,057) | | | 2008 | | 05/14/15 |
| Mishawaka, IN | | — | | | 3,670 | | | 14,416 | | | 1,382 | | | 3,670 | | | 15,798 | | | 19,468 | | | (4,375) | | | 1978 | | 07/14/15 |
| Niles, MI | | — | | | 404 | | | 5,050 | | | 802 | | | 404 | | | 5,852 | | | 6,256 | | | (1,775) | | | 2000 | | 06/11/15 and 11/20/15 |
| Nebraska Senior Housing Portfolio (SHOP) | Bennington, NE | | — | | | 981 | | | 20,427 | | | 1,418 | | | 981 | | | 21,845 | | | 22,826 | | | (5,422) | | | 2009 | | 05/29/15 |
| Omaha, NE | | — | | | 1,274 | | | 38,619 | | | 1,865 | | | 1,274 | | | 40,484 | | | 41,758 | | | (9,569) | | | 2000 | | 05/29/15 |
| Pennsylvania Senior Housing Portfolio (SHOP) | Bethlehem, PA | | — | | | 1,542 | | | 22,249 | | | 1,012 | | | 1,542 | | | 23,261 | | | 24,803 | | | (6,340) | | | 2005 | | 06/30/15 |
| Boyertown, PA | | 22,932 | | | 480 | | | 25,544 | | | 814 | | | 480 | | | 26,358 | | | 26,838 | | | (6,513) | | | 2000 | | 06/30/15 |
| York, PA | | 12,432 | | | 972 | | | 29,860 | | | 1,560 | | | 972 | | | 31,420 | | | 32,392 | | | (7,417) | | | 1986 | | 06/30/15 |
| Southern Illinois OM Portfolio (Outpatient Medical) | Waterloo, IL | | — | | | 94 | | | 1,977 | | | — | | | 94 | | | 1,977 | | | 2,071 | | | (595) | | | 2015 | | 07/01/15 |
| Waterloo, IL | | — | | | 738 | | | 6,332 | | | 588 | | | 738 | | | 6,920 | | | 7,658 | | | (2,010) | | | 1995 | | 07/01/15, 12/19/17 and 04/17/18 |
| Waterloo, IL | | — | | | 200 | | | 2,648 | | | (69) | | | 200 | | | 2,579 | | | 2,779 | | | (707) | | | 2011 | | 07/01/15 |
| Napa Medical Center (Outpatient Medical) | Napa, CA | | — | | | 1,176 | | | 13,328 | | | 2,223 | | | 1,176 | | | 15,551 | | | 16,727 | | | (4,695) | | | 1980 | | 07/02/15 |
| Chesterfield Corporate Plaza (Outpatient Medical) | Chesterfield, MO | | — | | | 8,030 | | | 24,533 | | | 3,617 | | | 8,030 | | | 28,150 | | | 36,180 | | | (9,020) | | | 1989 | | 08/14/15 |
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 20202023
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(e) | | | | |
| Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Total(d) | | Accumulated
Depreciation
(f)(g) | | Date of
Construction | | Date
Acquired |
| Catalina West Haven ALF (Senior Housing — RIDEA) | West Haven, UT | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,716,000 | | | $ | 9,633,000 | | | $ | 5,000 | | | $ | 1,716,000 | | | $ | 9,638,000 | | | $ | 11,354,000 | | | $ | (305,000) | | | 2012 | | 01/01/20 |
| Louisiana Senior Housing Portfolio (Senior Housing — RIDEA) | Gonzales, LA | | 0 | | | 1,139,000 | | | 5,674,000 | | | 29,000 | | | 1,139,000 | | | 5,703,000 | | | 6,842,000 | | | (222,000) | | | 1996 | | 01/03/20 |
| Monroe, LA | | 0 | | | 740,000 | | | 3,795,000 | | | 6,000 | | | 740,000 | | | 3,801,000 | | | 4,541,000 | | | (155,000) | | | 1994 | | 01/03/20 |
| New Iberia, LA | | 0 | | | 881,000 | | | 5,258,000 | | | 35,000 | | | 881,000 | | | 5,293,000 | | | 6,174,000 | | | (198,000) | | | 1996 | | 01/03/20 |
| Shreveport, LA | | 0 | | | 1,273,000 | | | 6,993,000 | | | 6,000 | | | 1,273,000 | | | 6,999,000 | | | 8,272,000 | | | (231,000) | | | 1996 | | 01/03/20 |
| Slidell, LA | | 0 | | | 855,000 | | | 4,152,000 | | | 8,000 | | | 855,000 | | | 4,160,000 | | | 5,015,000 | | | (170,000) | | | 1996 | | 01/03/20 |
| Catalina Madera ALF (Senior Housing — RIDEA) | Madera, CA | | 0 | | | 1,051,000 | | | 15,536,000 | | | 86,000 | | | 1,052,000 | | | 15,622,000 | | | 16,674,000 | | | (466,000) | | | 2005 | | 01/31/20 |
| | | $ | 18,766,000 | | | $ | 111,021,000 | | | $ | 878,763,000 | | | $ | 20,381,000 | | | $ | 111,027,000 | | | $ | 899,139,000 | | | $ | 1,010,166,000 | | | $ | (82,246,000) | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Construction in progress | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 26,000 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 26,000 | | | $ | 26,000 | | | $ | 0 | | | | | |
| | | $ | 18,766,000 | | | $ | 111,021,000 | | | $ | 878,763,000 | | | $ | 20,407,000 | | | $ | 111,027,000 | | | $ | 899,165,000 | | | $ | 1,010,192,000 | | | $ | (82,246,000) | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land and Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(b) | | Land and
Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated
Depreciation
(g)(h) | | Date of
Construction | | Date
Acquired |
| Richmond VA ALF (SHOP) | North Chesterfield, VA | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,146 | | | $ | 56,671 | | | $ | 1,237 | | | $ | 2,146 | | | $ | 57,908 | | | $ | 60,054 | | | $ | (12,955) | | | 2009 | | 09/11/15 |
| Crown Senior Care Portfolio (Senior Housing) | Peel, Isle of Man | | — | | | 1,164 | | | 6,952 | | | 82 | | | 1,164 | | | 7,034 | | | 8,198 | | | (1,736) | | | 2015 | | 09/15/15 |
| St. Albans, UK | | — | | | 1,174 | | | 12,344 | | | 681 | | | 1,174 | | | 13,025 | | | 14,199 | | | (3,224) | | | 2015 | | 10/08/15 |
| Salisbury, UK | | — | | | 1,248 | | | 11,986 | | | 55 | | | 1,248 | | | 12,041 | | | 13,289 | | | (2,961) | | | 2015 | | 12/08/15 |
| Aberdeen, UK | | — | | | 2,025 | | | 6,037 | | | 337 | | | 2,025 | | | 6,374 | | | 8,399 | | | (1,266) | | | 1986 | | 11/15/16 |
| Felixstowe, UK | | — | | | 704 | | | 5,800 | | | 514 | | | 704 | | | 6,314 | | | 7,018 | | | (1,328) | | | 2010/2011 | | 11/15/16 |
| Felixstowe, UK | | — | | | 531 | | | 2,542 | | | 343 | | | 531 | | | 2,885 | | | 3,416 | | | (681) | | | 2010/2011 | | 11/15/16 |
| Washington DC SNF (Skilled Nursing) | Washington, DC | | 60,100 | | | 1,194 | | | 34,200 | | | — | | | 1,194 | | | 34,200 | | | 35,394 | | | (9,056) | | | 1983 | | 10/29/15 |
| Stockbridge GA OM II (Outpatient Medical) | Stockbridge, GA | | — | | | 499 | | | 8,353 | | | 1,623 | | | 485 | | | 9,990 | | | 10,475 | | | (2,396) | | | 2006 | | 12/03/15 |
| Marietta GA OM II (Outpatient Medical) | Marietta, GA | | — | | | 661 | | | 4,783 | | | 309 | | | 661 | | | 5,092 | | | 5,753 | | | (1,298) | | | 2007 | | 12/09/15 |
| Lakeview IN Medical Plaza (Outpatient Medical) | Indianapolis, IN | | 20,155 | | | 2,375 | | | 15,911 | | | 9,762 | | | 2,375 | | | 25,673 | | | 28,048 | | | (7,326) | | | 1987 | | 01/21/16 |
| Pennsylvania Senior Housing Portfolio II (SHOP) | Palmyra, PA | | 19,114 | | | 835 | | | 24,424 | | | 703 | | | 835 | | | 25,127 | | | 25,962 | | | (6,528) | | | 2007 | | 02/01/16 |
| Snellville GA OM (Outpatient Medical) | Snellville, GA | | — | | | 332 | | | 7,781 | | | 2,329 | | | 332 | | | 10,110 | | | 10,442 | | | (2,285) | | | 2005 | | 02/05/16 |
| Stockbridge GA OM III (Outpatient Medical) | Stockbridge, GA | | — | | | 606 | | | 7,924 | | | 1,946 | | | 606 | | | 9,870 | | | 10,476 | | | (2,453) | | | 2007 | | 03/29/16 |
| Joplin MO OM (Outpatient Medical) | Joplin, MO | | — | | | 1,245 | | | 9,860 | | | 200 | | | 1,245 | | | 10,060 | | | 11,305 | | | (2,727) | | | 2000 | | 05/10/16 |
| Austell GA OM (Outpatient Medical) | Austell, GA | | — | | | 663 | | | 10,547 | | | 224 | | | 663 | | | 10,771 | | | 11,434 | | | (2,467) | | | 2008 | | 05/25/16 |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 2023
(in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land and Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(b) | | Land and
Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated
Depreciation
(g)(h) | | Date of
Construction | | Date
Acquired |
| Middletown OH OM (Outpatient Medical) | Middletown, OH | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 17,389 | | | $ | 3,242 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 20,631 | | | $ | 20,631 | | | $ | (4,206) | | | 2007 | | 06/16/16 |
| Fox Grape SNF Portfolio (Skilled Nursing) | Braintree, MA | | — | | | 1,844 | | | 10,847 | | | 31 | | | 1,844 | | | 10,878 | | | 12,722 | | | (2,327) | | | 2015 | | 07/01/16 |
| Brighton, MA | | — | | | 779 | | | 2,661 | | | 475 | | | 779 | | | 3,136 | | | 3,915 | | | (702) | | | 1982 | | 07/01/16 |
| Duxbury, MA | | — | | | 2,921 | | | 11,244 | | | 1,933 | | | 2,921 | | | 13,177 | | | 16,098 | | | (3,155) | | | 1983 | | 07/01/16 |
| Hingham, MA | | — | | | 2,316 | | | 17,390 | | | (166) | | | 2,316 | | | 17,224 | | | 19,540 | | | (3,670) | | | 1990 | | 07/01/16 |
| Quincy, MA | | 13,329 | | | 3,537 | | | 13,697 | | | 459 | | | 3,537 | | | 14,156 | | | 17,693 | | | (2,930) | | | 1995 | | 11/01/16 |
| Voorhees NJ OM (Outpatient Medical) | Voorhees, NJ | | — | | | 1,727 | | | 8,451 | | | 2,655 | | | 1,727 | | | 11,106 | | | 12,833 | | | (2,845) | | | 2008 | | 07/08/16 |
| Norwich CT OM Portfolio (Outpatient Medical) | Norwich, CT | | — | | | 403 | | | 1,601 | | | 1,234 | | | 403 | | | 2,835 | | | 3,238 | | | (1,050) | | | 2014 | | 12/16/16 |
| Norwich, CT | | — | | | 804 | | | 12,094 | | | 1,265 | | | 804 | | | 13,359 | | | 14,163 | | | (2,882) | | | 1999 | | 12/16/16 |
| Middletown OH OM II (Outpatient Medical) | Middletown, OH | | — | | | — | | | 3,949 | | | 683 | | | — | | | 4,632 | | | 4,632 | | | (791) | | | 2007 | | 12/20/17 |
| Homewood Health Campus (ISHC) | Lebanon, IN | | 8,354 | | | 973 | | | 9,702 | | | 2,467 | | | 1,100 | | | 12,042 | | | 13,142 | | | (2,334) | | | 2000 | | 12/01/15 |
| Ashford Place Health Campus (ISHC) | Shelbyville, IN | | 5,663 | | | 664 | | | 12,662 | | | 1,412 | | | 857 | | | 13,881 | | | 14,738 | | | (3,100) | | | 2004 | | 12/01/15 |
| Mill Pond Health Campus (ISHC) | Greencastle, IN | | 6,701 | | | 1,576 | | | 8,124 | | | 727 | | | 1,629 | | | 8,798 | | | 10,427 | | | (1,905) | | | 2005 | | 12/01/15 |
| St. Andrews Health Campus (ISHC) | Batesville, IN | | 4,228 | | | 552 | | | 8,213 | | | 705 | | | 772 | | | 8,698 | | | 9,470 | | | (1,964) | | | 2005 | | 12/01/15 |
| Hampton Oaks Health Campus (ISHC) | Scottsburg, IN | | 5,952 | | | 720 | | | 8,145 | | | 824 | | | 845 | | | 8,844 | | | 9,689 | | | (2,023) | | | 2006 | | 12/01/15 |
| Forest Park Health Campus (ISHC) | Richmond, IN | | 6,500 | | | 535 | | | 9,399 | | | 893 | | | 647 | | | 10,180 | | | 10,827 | | | (2,281) | | | 2007 | | 12/01/15 |
| The Maples at Waterford Crossing (ISHC) | Goshen, IN | | 5,533 | | | 344 | | | 8,027 | | | 1,989 | | | 363 | | | 9,997 | | | 10,360 | | | (1,753) | | | 2006 | | 12/01/15 |
| Morrison Woods Health Campus (ISHC) | Muncie, IN | | 26,888 | | | 1,903 | | | 21,806 | | | 1,414 | | | 1,922 | | | 23,201 | | | 25,123 | | | (4,039) | | | 2008/2022 | | 12/01/15, 09/14/16 and 03/03/21 |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 2023
(in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land and Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(b) | | Land and
Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated
Depreciation
(g)(h) | | Date of
Construction | | Date
Acquired |
| Woodbridge Health Campus (ISHC) | Logansport, IN | | $ | 7,910 | | | $ | 228 | | | $ | 11,812 | | | $ | 536 | | | $ | 262 | | | $ | 12,314 | | | $ | 12,576 | | | $ | (2,687) | | | 2003 | | 12/01/15 |
| Bridgepointe Health Campus (ISHC) | Vincennes, IN | | 6,775 | | | 747 | | | 7,469 | | | 2,004 | | | 909 | | | 9,311 | | | 10,220 | | | (1,892) | | | 2002/2022 | | 12/01/15 |
| Greenleaf Living Center (ISHC) | Elkhart, IN | | 10,851 | | | 492 | | | 12,157 | | | 1,234 | | | 521 | | | 13,362 | | | 13,883 | | | (2,854) | | | 2000 | | 12/01/15 |
| Forest Glen Health Campus (ISHC) | Springfield, OH | | 9,056 | | | 846 | | | 12,754 | | | 1,195 | | | 1,055 | | | 13,740 | | | 14,795 | | | (3,062) | | | 2007 | | 12/01/15 |
| The Meadows of Kalida Health Campus (ISHC) | Kalida, OH | | 7,492 | | | 298 | | | 7,628 | | | 598 | | | 394 | | | 8,130 | | | 8,524 | | | (1,726) | | | 2007 | | 12/01/15 |
| The Heritage (ISHC) | Findlay, OH | | 12,311 | | | 1,312 | | | 13,475 | | | 730 | | | 1,434 | | | 14,083 | | | 15,517 | | | (3,105) | | | 1975 | | 12/01/15 |
| Genoa Retirement Village (ISHC) | Genoa, OH | | 7,911 | | | 881 | | | 8,113 | | | 1,728 | | | 1,054 | | | 9,668 | | | 10,722 | | | (2,059) | | | 1985 | | 12/01/15 |
| Waterford Crossing (ISHC) | Goshen, IN | | 7,581 | | | 344 | | | 4,381 | | | 1,001 | | | 349 | | | 5,377 | | | 5,726 | | | (1,197) | | | 2004 | | 12/01/15 |
| St. Elizabeth Healthcare (ISHC) | Delphi, IN | | 8,351 | | | 522 | | | 5,463 | | | 5,490 | | | 643 | | | 10,832 | | | 11,475 | | | (2,255) | | | 1986 | | 12/01/15 |
| Cumberland Pointe (ISHC) | West Lafayette, IN | | 8,846 | | | 1,645 | | | 13,696 | | | 818 | | | 1,905 | | | 14,254 | | | 16,159 | | | (3,480) | | | 1980 | | 12/01/15 |
| Franciscan Healthcare Center (ISHC) | Louisville, KY | | 9,922 | | | 808 | | | 8,439 | | | 3,218 | | | 915 | | | 11,550 | | | 12,465 | | | (2,535) | | | 1975 | | 12/01/15 |
| Blair Ridge Health Campus (ISHC) | Peru, IN | | 7,311 | | | 734 | | | 11,648 | | | 1,041 | | | 789 | | | 12,634 | | | 13,423 | | | (3,119) | | | 2001 | | 12/01/15 |
| Glen Oaks Health Campus (ISHC) | New Castle, IN | | 4,855 | | | 384 | | | 8,189 | | | 504 | | | 419 | | | 8,658 | | | 9,077 | | | (1,756) | | | 2011 | | 12/01/15 |
| Covered Bridge Health Campus (ISHC) | Seymour, IN | | (c) | | 386 | | | 9,699 | | | 927 | | | 45 | | | 10,967 | | | 11,012 | | | (2,407) | | | 2002 | | 12/01/15 |
| Stonebridge Health Campus (ISHC) | Bedford, IN | | 9,409 | | | 1,087 | | | 7,965 | | | 2,223 | | | 1,144 | | | 10,131 | | | 11,275 | | | (1,958) | | | 2004 | | 12/01/15 |
| RiverOaks Health Campus (ISHC) | Princeton, IN | | 14,018 | | | 440 | | | 8,953 | | | 2,557 | | | 764 | | | 11,186 | | | 11,950 | | | (2,187) | | | 2004 | | 12/01/15 |
| Park Terrace Health Campus (ISHC) | Louisville, KY | | (c) | | 2,177 | | | 7,626 | | | 1,749 | | | 2,177 | | | 9,375 | | | 11,552 | | | (2,152) | | | 1977 | | 12/01/15 |
| Cobblestone Crossing (ISHC) | Terre Haute, IN | | (c) | | 1,462 | | | 13,860 | | | 5,892 | | | 1,564 | | | 19,650 | | | 21,214 | | | (4,160) | | | 2008 | | 12/01/15 |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 2023
(in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land and Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(b) | | Land and
Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated
Depreciation
(g)(h) | | Date of
Construction | | Date
Acquired |
| Creasy Springs Health Campus (ISHC) | Lafayette, IN | | $ | 15,531 | | | $ | 2,111 | | | $ | 14,337 | | | $ | 6,223 | | | $ | 2,512 | | | $ | 20,159 | | | $ | 22,671 | | | $ | (4,286) | | | 2010 | | 12/01/15 |
| Avalon Springs Health Campus (ISHC) | Valparaiso, IN | | 16,894 | | | 1,542 | | | 14,107 | | | 277 | | | 1,607 | | | 14,319 | | | 15,926 | | | (3,092) | | | 2012 | | 12/01/15 |
| Prairie Lakes Health Campus (ISHC) | Noblesville, IN | | 8,525 | | | 2,204 | | | 13,227 | | | 623 | | | 2,342 | | | 13,712 | | | 16,054 | | | (2,937) | | | 2010 | | 12/01/15 |
| RidgeWood Health Campus (ISHC) | Lawrenceburg, IN | | 13,278 | | | 1,240 | | | 16,118 | | | 437 | | | 1,268 | | | 16,527 | | | 17,795 | | | (3,483) | | | 2009 | | 12/01/15 |
| Westport Place Health Campus (ISHC) | Louisville, KY | | (c) | | 1,245 | | | 9,946 | | | 1,299 | | | 1,262 | | | 11,228 | | | 12,490 | | | (2,229) | | | 2011 | | 12/01/15 |
| Paddock Springs (ISHC) | Warsaw, IN | | 13,195 | | | 488 | | | — | | | 10,638 | | | 660 | | | 10,466 | | | 11,126 | | | (1,437) | | | 2019 | | 02/14/19 |
| Amber Manor Care Center (ISHC) | Petersburg, IN | | 5,390 | | | 446 | | | 6,063 | | | 538 | | | 515 | | | 6,532 | | | 7,047 | | | (1,506) | | | 1990 | | 12/01/15 |
| The Meadows of Leipsic Health Campus (ISHC) | Leipsic, OH | | (c) | | 1,242 | | | 6,988 | | | 967 | | | 1,428 | | | 7,769 | | | 9,197 | | | (1,803) | | | 1986 | | 12/01/15 |
| Springview Manor (ISHC) | Lima, OH | | (c) | | 260 | | | 3,968 | | | 649 | | | 408 | | | 4,469 | | | 4,877 | | | (986) | | | 1978 | | 12/01/15 |
| Willows at Bellevue (ISHC) | Bellevue, OH | | 15,821 | | | 587 | | | 15,575 | | | 1,530 | | | 790 | | | 16,902 | | | 17,692 | | | (3,726) | | | 2008 | | 12/01/15 |
| Briar Hill Health Campus (ISHC) | North Baltimore, OH | | (c) | | 673 | | | 2,688 | | | 569 | | | 756 | | | 3,174 | | | 3,930 | | | (793) | | | 1977 | | 12/01/15 |
| Cypress Pointe Health Campus (ISHC) | Englewood, OH | | (c) | | 921 | | | 10,291 | | | 11,066 | | | 1,850 | | | 20,428 | | | 22,278 | | | (3,277) | | | 2010 | | 12/01/15 |
| The Oaks at NorthPointe Woods (ISHC) | Battle Creek, MI | | (c) | | 567 | | | 12,716 | | | 240 | | | 571 | | | 12,952 | | | 13,523 | | | (2,741) | | | 2008 | | 12/01/15 |
| Westlake Health Campus (ISHC) | Commerce, MI | | 13,809 | | | 815 | | | 13,502 | | | 202 | | | 547 | | | 13,972 | | | 14,519 | | | (2,953) | | | 2011 | | 12/01/15 |
| Springhurst Health Campus (ISHC) | Greenfield, IN | | 19,200 | | | 931 | | | 14,114 | | | 4,170 | | | 2,330 | | | 16,885 | | | 19,215 | | | (4,357) | | | 2007 | | 12/01/15 and 05/16/17 |
| Glen Ridge Health Campus (ISHC) | Louisville, KY | | (c) | | 1,208 | | | 9,771 | | | 2,569 | | | 1,402 | | | 12,146 | | | 13,548 | | | (2,769) | | | 2006 | | 12/01/15 |
| St. Mary Healthcare (ISHC) | Lafayette, IN | | 5,058 | | | 348 | | | 2,710 | | | 344 | | | 393 | | | 3,009 | | | 3,402 | | | (694) | | | 1969 | | 12/01/15 |
| The Oaks at Woodfield (ISHC) | Grand Blanc, MI | | 14,880 | | | 897 | | | 12,270 | | | 676 | | | 1,130 | | | 12,713 | | | 13,843 | | | (2,790) | | | 2012 | | 12/01/15 |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 2023
(in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land and Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(b) | | Land and
Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated
Depreciation
(g)(h) | | Date of
Construction | | Date
Acquired |
| Stonegate Health Campus (ISHC) | Lapeer, MI | | $ | 10,976 | | | $ | 538 | | | $ | 13,159 | | | $ | 406 | | | $ | 717 | | | $ | 13,386 | | | $ | 14,103 | | | $ | (2,930) | | | 2012 | | 12/01/15 |
| Senior Living at Forest Ridge (ISHC) | New Castle, IN | | (c) | | 204 | | | 5,470 | | | 363 | | | 325 | | | 5,712 | | | 6,037 | | | (1,255) | | | 2005 | | 12/01/15 |
| River Terrace Health Campus (ISHC) | Madison, IN | | (c) | | — | | | 13,378 | | | 4,346 | | | 76 | | | 17,648 | | | 17,724 | | | (3,966) | | | 2016 | | 03/28/16 |
| St. Charles Health Campus (ISHC) | Jasper, IN | | 11,053 | | | 467 | | | 14,532 | | | 2,404 | | | 558 | | | 16,845 | | | 17,403 | | | (3,690) | | | 2000 | | 06/24/16 and 06/30/16 |
| Bethany Pointe Health Campus (ISHC) | Anderson, IN | | 18,945 | | | 2,337 | | | 26,524 | | | 2,812 | | | 2,550 | | | 29,123 | | | 31,673 | | | (6,509) | | | 1999 | | 06/30/16 |
| River Pointe Health Campus (ISHC) | Evansville, IN | | 13,606 | | | 1,118 | | | 14,736 | | | 1,998 | | | 1,204 | | | 16,648 | | | 17,852 | | | (3,802) | | | 1999 | | 06/30/16 |
| Waterford Place Health Campus (ISHC) | Kokomo, IN | | 14,404 | | | 1,219 | | | 18,557 | | | 6,653 | | | 1,805 | | | 24,624 | | | 26,429 | | | (4,680) | | | 2000/2022 | | 06/30/16 |
| Autumn Woods Health Campus (ISHC) | New Albany, IN | | (c) | | 1,016 | | | 13,414 | | | 1,850 | | | 1,048 | | | 15,232 | | | 16,280 | | | (3,710) | | | 2000 | | 06/30/16 |
| Oakwood Health Campus (ISHC) | Tell City, IN | | 8,842 | | | 783 | | | 11,880 | | | 1,396 | | | 868 | | | 13,191 | | | 14,059 | | | (3,191) | | | 2000 | | 06/30/16 |
| Cedar Ridge Health Campus (ISHC) | Cynthiana, KY | | (c) | | 102 | | | 8,435 | | | 3,745 | | | 205 | | | 12,077 | | | 12,282 | | | (3,276) | | | 2005 | | 06/30/16 |
| Aspen Place Health Campus (ISHC) | Greensburg, IN | | 9,188 | | | 980 | | | 10,970 | | | 963 | | | 1,212 | | | 11,701 | | | 12,913 | | | (2,669) | | | 2012 | | 08/16/16 |
| The Willows at East Lansing (ISHC) | East Lansing, MI | | 15,878 | | | 1,449 | | | 15,161 | | | 1,681 | | | 1,496 | | | 16,795 | | | 18,291 | | | (3,940) | | | 2014 | | 08/16/16 |
| The Willows at Howell (ISHC) | Howell, MI | | (c) | | 1,051 | | | 12,099 | | | 6,763 | | | 1,158 | | | 18,755 | | | 19,913 | | | (3,429) | | | 2015 | | 08/16/16 |
| The Willows at Okemos (ISHC) | Okemos, MI | | 7,277 | | | 1,171 | | | 12,326 | | | 1,045 | | | 1,229 | | | 13,313 | | | 14,542 | | | (3,139) | | | 2014 | | 08/16/16 |
| Shelby Crossing Health Campus (ISHC) | Macomb, MI | | 16,686 | | | 2,533 | | | 18,440 | | | 2,404 | | | 2,620 | | | 20,757 | | | 23,377 | | | (5,154) | | | 2013 | | 08/16/16 |
| Village Green Healthcare Center (ISHC) | Greenville, OH | | 6,763 | | | 355 | | | 9,696 | | | 1,175 | | | 448 | | | 10,778 | | | 11,226 | | | (2,314) | | | 2014 | | 08/16/16 |
| The Oaks at Northpointe (ISHC) | Zanesville, OH | | (c) | | 624 | | | 11,665 | | | 1,106 | | | 722 | | | 12,673 | | | 13,395 | | | (2,973) | | | 2013 | | 08/16/16 |
| The Oaks at Bethesda (ISHC) | Zanesville, OH | | 4,417 | | | 714 | | | 10,791 | | | 949 | | | 812 | | | 11,642 | | | 12,454 | | | (2,635) | | | 2013 | | 08/16/16 |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 2023
(in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land and Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(b) | | Land and
Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated
Depreciation
(g)(h) | | Date of
Construction | | Date
Acquired |
| White Oak Health Campus (ISHC) | Monticello, IN | | $ | 20,088 | | | $ | 1,005 | | | $ | 13,207 | | | $ | 208 | | | $ | 1,005 | | | $ | 13,415 | | | $ | 14,420 | | | $ | (2,173) | | | 2010 | | 09/23/16 and 07/30/20 |
| Woodmont Health Campus (ISHC) | Boonville, IN | | 7,584 | | | 790 | | | 9,633 | | | 1,236 | | | 1,010 | | | 10,649 | | | 11,659 | | | (2,547) | | | 2000 | | 02/01/17 |
| Silver Oaks Health Campus (ISHC) | Columbus, IN | | (c) | | 1,776 | | | 21,420 | | | 1,499 | | | 8 | | | 24,687 | | | 24,695 | | | (5,513) | | | 2001 | | 02/01/17 |
| Thornton Terrace Health Campus (ISHC) | Hanover, IN | | 5,375 | | | 764 | | | 9,209 | | | 1,601 | | | 873 | | | 10,701 | | | 11,574 | | | (2,386) | | | 2003 | | 02/01/17 |
| The Willows at Hamburg (ISHC) | Lexington, KY | | 11,192 | | | 1,740 | | | 13,422 | | | 1,676 | | | 1,810 | | | 15,028 | | | 16,838 | | | (2,912) | | | 2012 | | 02/01/17 |
| The Lakes at Monclova (ISHC) | Monclova, OH | | 19,130 | | | 2,869 | | | 12,855 | | | 10,302 | | | 3,186 | | | 22,840 | | | 26,026 | | | (3,884) | | | 2013 | | 12/01/17 |
| The Willows at Willard (ISHC) | Willard, OH | | (c) | | 610 | | | 12,256 | | | 10,003 | | | 223 | | | 22,646 | | | 22,869 | | | (4,267) | | | 2012 | | 02/01/17 |
| Westlake Health Campus — Commerce Villa (ISHC) | Commerce, MI | | (c) | | 261 | | | 6,610 | | | 1,270 | | | 553 | | | 7,588 | | | 8,141 | | | (1,458) | | | 2017 | | 11/17/17 |
| Orchard Grove Health Campus (ISHC) | Romeo, MI | | 27,515 | | | 2,065 | | | 11,510 | | | 18,156 | | | 3,515 | | | 28,216 | | | 31,731 | | | (3,902) | | | 2016 | | 07/20/18 and 11/30/17 |
| The Meadows of Ottawa (ISHC) | Ottawa, OH | | — | | | 695 | | | 7,752 | | | 1,168 | | | 728 | | | 8,887 | | | 9,615 | | | (1,729) | | | 2014 | | 12/15/17 |
| Valley View Healthcare Center (ISHC) | Fremont, OH | | 10,237 | | | 930 | | | 7,635 | | | 1,546 | | | 1,107 | | | 9,004 | | | 10,111 | | | (1,353) | | | 2017 | | 07/20/18 |
| Novi Lakes Health Campus (ISHC) | Novi, MI | | 12,154 | | | 1,654 | | | 7,494 | | | 2,770 | | | 1,702 | | | 10,216 | | | 11,918 | | | (2,420) | | | 2016 | | 07/20/18 |
| The Willows at Fritz Farm (ISHC) | Lexington, KY | | 8,918 | | | 1,538 | | | 8,637 | | | 455 | | | 1,563 | | | 9,067 | | | 10,630 | | | (1,316) | | | 2017 | | 07/20/18 |
| Trilogy Real Estate Gahanna, LLC (ISHC) | Gahanna, OH | | (c) | | 1,146 | | | — | | | 16,745 | | | 1,218 | | | 16,673 | | | 17,891 | | | (1,361) | | | 2020 | | 11/13/20 |
| Oaks at Byron Center (ISHC) | Byron Center, MI | | 14,264 | | | 2,000 | | | — | | | 15,932 | | | 2,193 | | | 15,739 | | | 17,932 | | | (1,517) | | | 2020 | | 07/08/20 |
| Harrison Springs Health Campus (ISHC) | Corydon, IN | | (c) | | 2,017 | | | 11,487 | | | 5,933 | | | 2,305 | | | 17,132 | | | 19,437 | | | (1,775) | | | 2016/2022 | | 09/05/19 |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 2023
(in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land and Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(b) | | Land and
Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated
Depreciation
(g)(h) | | Date of
Construction | | Date
Acquired |
| The Cloister at Silvercrest (ISHC) | New Albany, IN | | (c) | | $ | 139 | | | $ | 634 | | | $ | 6 | | | $ | 139 | | | $ | 640 | | | $ | 779 | | | $ | (70) | | | 1940 | | 10/01/19 |
| Trilogy Healthcare of Ferdinand II, LLC (ISHC) | Ferdinand, IN | | 16,805 | | | — | | | — | | | 14,619 | | | — | | | 14,619 | | | 14,619 | | | (1,541) | | | 2019 | | 11/19/19 |
| Forest Springs Health Campus (ISHC) | Louisville, KY | | (c) | | 964 | | | 16,691 | | | 363 | | | 1,000 | | | 17,018 | | | 18,018 | | | (1,654) | | | 2015 | | 07/30/20 |
| Gateway Springs Health Campus (ISHC) | Hamilton, OH | | 11,505 | | | 1,277 | | | 10,923 | | | 1,615 | | | 1,431 | | | 12,384 | | | 13,815 | | | (1,016) | | | 2020 | | 12/28/20 |
| Orchard Pointe Health Campus (ISHC) | Kendallville, IN | | 10,176 | | | 1,806 | | | 9,243 | | | 15 | | | 1,806 | | | 9,258 | | | 11,064 | | | (1,003) | | | 2016 | | 01/19/21 |
| The Meadows of Delphos (ISHC) | Delphos, OH | | 9,330 | | | 2,345 | | | 8,150 | | | 98 | | | 2,382 | | | 8,211 | | | 10,593 | | | (1,140) | | | 2018 | | 01/19/21 |
| The Springs of Lima (ISHC) | Lima, OH | | 10,765 | | | 2,397 | | | 9,638 | | | 50 | | | 2,403 | | | 9,682 | | | 12,085 | | | (1,216) | | | 2018 | | 01/19/21 |
| Wooded Glen (ISHC) | Springfield, OH | | 14,450 | | | 2,803 | | | 11,928 | | | 15 | | | 2,803 | | | 11,943 | | | 14,746 | | | (1,436) | | | 2018 | | 01/19/21 |
| The Lakes of Sylvania (ISHC) | Sylvania, OH | | 19,493 | | | 3,208 | | | 15,059 | | | 232 | | | 3,265 | | | 15,234 | | | 18,499 | | | (1,869) | | | 2017 | | 01/19/21 |
| The Glen (ISHC) | Union Township, OH | | 14,741 | | | 2,789 | | | 12,343 | | | 35 | | | 2,789 | | | 12,378 | | | 15,167 | | | (1,431) | | | 2018 | | 01/19/21 |
| Harrison Trial Health Campus (ISHC) | Harrison, OH | | 15,632 | | | 1,750 | | | 17,114 | | | 86 | | | 2,048 | | | 16,902 | | | 18,950 | | | (1,266) | | | 2021 | | 04/28/21 |
| The Oaks of Belmont (ISHC) | Grand Rapids, MI | | 14,795 | | | 767 | | | 17,043 | | | 192 | | | 1,068 | | | 16,934 | | | 18,002 | | | (1,349) | | | 2021 | | 03/13/21 |
| Cedar Creek Health Campus (ISHC) | Lowell, IN | | (c) | | 2,326 | | | 12,650 | | | 770 | | | 2,864 | | | 12,882 | | | 15,746 | | | (833) | | | 2014 | | 07/07/21 |
| Charlottesville OM (Outpatient Medical) | Charlottesville, VA | | — | | | 4,902 | | | 19,741 | | | 785 | | | 4,902 | | | 20,526 | | | 25,428 | | | (1,652) | | | 2001 | | 10/01/21 |
| Rochester Hills OM (Outpatient Medical) | Rochester Hills, MI | | 1,813 | | | 2,218 | | | 8,380 | | | 947 | | | 2,218 | | | 9,327 | | | 11,545 | | | (918) | | | 1990 | | 10/01/21 |
| Cullman OM III (Outpatient Medical) | Cullman, AL | | — | | | — | | | 19,224 | | | (587) | | | — | | | 18,637 | | | 18,637 | | | (1,080) | | | 2010 | | 10/01/21 |
| Iron OM Portfolio (Outpatient Medical) | Cullman, AL | | — | | | — | | | 14,799 | | | 1,382 | | | — | | | 16,181 | | | 16,181 | | | (1,552) | | | 1994 | | 10/01/21 |
| Cullman, AL | | — | | | — | | | 12,287 | | | 438 | | | — | | | 12,725 | | | 12,725 | | | (1,071) | | | 1998 | | 10/01/21 |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 2023
(in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land and Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(b) | | Land and
Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated
Depreciation
(g)(h) | | Date of
Construction | | Date
Acquired |
| Sylacauga, AL | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 11,273 | | | $ | 2,161 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 13,434 | | | $ | 13,434 | | | $ | (976) | | | 1997 | | 10/01/21 |
| Mint Hill OM (Outpatient Medical) | Mint Hill, NC | | — | | | — | | | 24,110 | | | (26) | | | — | | | 24,084 | | | 24,084 | | | (1,981) | | | 2007 | | 10/01/21 |
| Lafayette Assisted Living Portfolio (SHOP) | Lafayette, LA | | — | | | 1,206 | | | 9,076 | | | 697 | | | 1,206 | | | 9,773 | | | 10,979 | | | (569) | | | 1996 | | 10/01/21 |
| Lafayette, LA | | — | | | 1,039 | | | 4,684 | | | 255 | | | 1,039 | | | 4,939 | | | 5,978 | | | (316) | | | 2014 | | 10/01/21 |
| Battle Creek OM (Outpatient Medical) | Battle Creek, MI | | — | | | 1,156 | | | 7,910 | | | 10 | | | 1,156 | | | 7,920 | | | 9,076 | | | (855) | | | 1996 | | 10/01/21 |
| Reno OM (Outpatient Medical) | Reno, NV | | — | | | — | | | 82,515 | | | 735 | | | — | | | 83,250 | | | 83,250 | | | (6,090) | | | 2005 | | 10/01/21 |
| Athens OM Portfolio (Outpatient Medical) | Athens, GA | | — | | | 860 | | | 7,989 | | | 120 | | | 860 | | | 8,109 | | | 8,969 | | | (689) | | | 2006 | | 10/01/21 |
| Athens, GA | | — | | | 1,106 | | | 11,531 | | | 456 | | | 1,106 | | | 11,987 | | | 13,093 | | | (962) | | | 2006 | | 10/01/21 |
| SW Illinois Senior Housing Portfolio (Senior Housing) | Columbia, IL | | — | | | 1,117 | | | 9,700 | | | — | | | 1,117 | | | 9,700 | | | 10,817 | | | (640) | | | 2007 | | 10/01/21 |
| Columbia, IL | | — | | | 147 | | | 2,106 | | | — | | | 147 | | | 2,106 | | | 2,253 | | | (135) | | | 1999 | | 10/01/21 |
| Millstadt, IL | | — | | | 259 | | | 3,980 | | | — | | | 259 | | | 3,980 | | | 4,239 | | | (256) | | | 2004 | | 10/01/21 |
| Red Bud, IL | | — | | | 690 | | | 5,175 | | | — | | | 690 | | | 5,175 | | | 5,865 | | | (332) | | | 2006 | | 10/01/21 |
| Waterloo, IL | | — | | | 934 | | | 8,932 | | | — | | | 934 | | | 8,932 | | | 9,866 | | | (576) | | | 2012 | | 10/01/21 |
| Lawrenceville OM (Outpatient Medical) | Lawrenceville, GA | | — | | | 1,663 | | | 12,019 | | | 250 | | | 1,663 | | | 12,269 | | | 13,932 | | | (1,019) | | | 2005 | | 10/01/21 |
| Northern California Senior Housing Portfolio (SHOP) | Belmont, CA | | — | | | 10,491 | | | 9,650 | | | (6,971) | | | 10,491 | | | 2,679 | | | 13,170 | | | (624) | | | 1958/2000 | | 10/01/21 |
| Menlo Park, CA | | — | | | 3,730 | | | 3,018 | | | (6,741) | | | — | | | 7 | | | 7 | | | — | | | 1945 | | 10/01/21 |
| Roseburg OM (Outpatient Medical) | Roseburg, OR | | — | | | — | | | 28,140 | | | 134 | | | — | | | 28,274 | | | 28,274 | | | (2,180) | | | 2003 | | 10/01/21 |
| Fairfield County OM (Outpatient Medical) | Trumbull, CT | | — | | | 2,797 | | | 10,400 | | | 274 | | | 2,797 | | | 10,674 | | | 13,471 | | | (1,137) | | | 1987 | | 10/01/21 |
| Central Wisconsin Senior Care Portfolio (SHOP) | Sun Prairie, WI | | — | | | 543 | | | 2,587 | | | 70 | | | 543 | | | 2,657 | | | 3,200 | | | (202) | | | 1960/2006 | | 10/01/21 |
| Waunakee, WI | | — | | | 2,171 | | | 10,198 | | | 423 | | | 2,171 | | | 10,621 | | | 12,792 | | | (796) | | | 1974/2005 | | 10/01/21 |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 2023
(in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land and Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(b) | | Land and
Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated
Depreciation
(g)(h) | | Date of
Construction | | Date
Acquired |
| Sauk Prairie OM (Outpatient Medical) | Prairie du Sac, WI | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,044 | | | $ | 19,669 | | | $ | 401 | | | $ | 2,044 | | | $ | 20,070 | | | $ | 22,114 | | | $ | (1,558) | | | 2014 | | 10/01/21 |
| Surprise OM (Outpatient Medical) | Surprise, AZ | | — | | | 1,827 | | | 10,968 | | | 443 | | | 1,827 | | | 11,411 | | | 13,238 | | | (881) | | | 2012 | | 10/01/21 |
| Southfield OM (Outpatient Medical) | Southfield, MI | | 5,408 | | | 1,634 | | | 16,550 | | | 1,187 | | | 1,634 | | | 17,737 | | | 19,371 | | | (1,824) | | | 1975/2014 | | 10/01/21 |
| Pinnacle Beaumont ALF (SHOP) | Beaumont, TX | | — | | | 1,775 | | | 17,541 | | | 39 | | | 1,775 | | | 17,580 | | | 19,355 | | | (1,062) | | | 2012 | | 10/01/21 |
| Grand Junction OM (Outpatient Medical) | Grand Junction, CO | | — | | | 2,460 | | | 34,188 | | | 42 | | | 2,460 | | | 34,230 | | | 36,690 | | | (2,749) | | | 2013 | | 10/01/21 |
| Edmonds OM (Outpatient Medical) | Edmonds, WA | | — | | | 4,523 | | | 22,414 | | | 338 | | | 4,523 | | | 22,752 | | | 27,275 | | | (1,826) | | | 1991/2008 | | 10/01/21 |
| Pinnacle Warrenton ALF (SHOP) | Warrenton, MO | | — | | | 514 | | | 7,059 | | | (2,240) | | | — | | | 5,333 | | | 5,333 | | | (462) | | | 1986 | | 10/01/21 |
| Glendale OM (Outpatient Medical) | Glendale, WI | | — | | | 665 | | | 6,782 | | | 410 | | | 665 | | | 7,192 | | | 7,857 | | | (701) | | | 2004 | | 10/01/21 |
| Missouri SNF Portfolio (Skilled Nursing) | Florissant, MO | | — | | | 800 | | | 10,363 | | | — | | | 800 | | | 10,363 | | | 11,163 | | | (692) | | | 1987 | | 10/01/21 |
| Kansas City, MO | | — | | | 2,090 | | | 10,527 | | | — | | | 2,090 | | | 10,527 | | | 12,617 | | | (821) | | | 1974 | | 10/01/21 |
| Milan, MO | | — | | | 493 | | | 7,057 | | | — | | | 493 | | | 7,057 | | | 7,550 | | | (464) | | | 1980 | | 10/01/21 |
| Missouri, MO | | — | | | 729 | | | 10,187 | | | — | | | 729 | | | 10,187 | | | 10,916 | | | (658) | | | 1963 | | 10/01/21 |
| Salisbury, MO | | — | | | 515 | | | 8,852 | | | — | | | 515 | | | 8,852 | | | 9,367 | | | (584) | | | 1970 | | 10/01/21 |
| Sedalia, MO | | — | | | 631 | | | 24,172 | | | — | | | 631 | | | 24,172 | | | 24,803 | | | (1,466) | | | 1975 | | 10/01/21 |
| St. Elizabeth, MO | | — | | | 437 | | | 4,561 | | | — | | | 437 | | | 4,561 | | | 4,998 | | | (307) | | | 1981 | | 10/01/21 |
| Trenton, MO | | — | | | 310 | | | 4,875 | | | — | | | 310 | | | 4,875 | | | 5,185 | | | (316) | | | 1967 | | 10/01/21 |
| Flemington OM Portfolio (Outpatient Medical) | Flemington, NJ | | — | | | 1,419 | | | 11,110 | | | 553 | | | 1,419 | | | 11,663 | | | 13,082 | | | (1,107) | | | 2002 | | 10/01/21 |
| Flemington, NJ | | — | | | 578 | | | 3,340 | | | 297 | | | 578 | | | 3,637 | | | 4,215 | | | (370) | | | 1993 | | 10/01/21 |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 2023
(in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land and Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(b) | | Land and
Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated
Depreciation
(g)(h) | | Date of
Construction | | Date
Acquired |
| Lawrenceville OM II (Outpatient Medical) | Lawrenceville, GA | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,058 | | | $ | 9,709 | | | $ | 1,718 | | | $ | 1,058 | | | $ | 11,427 | | | $ | 12,485 | | | $ | (994) | | | 1990 | | 10/01/21 |
| Mill Creek OM (Outpatient Medical) | Mill Creek, WA | | — | | | 1,344 | | | 7,516 | | | 535 | | | 1,344 | | | 8,051 | | | 9,395 | | | (610) | | | 1991 | | 10/01/21 |
| Modesto OM (Outpatient Medical) | Modesto, CA | | — | | | — | | | 16,065 | | | 479 | | | — | | | 16,544 | | | 16,544 | | | (1,310) | | | 1991/2016 | | 10/01/21 |
| Michigan ALF Portfolio (SHOP) | Grand Rapids, MI | | — | | | 1,196 | | | 8,955 | | | — | | | 1,196 | | | 8,955 | | | 10,151 | | | (619) | | | 1953/2016 | | 10/01/21 |
| Grand Rapids, MI | | 9,608 | | | 1,291 | | | 11,308 | | | — | | | 1,291 | | | 11,308 | | | 12,599 | | | (779) | | | 1989 | | 10/01/21 |
| Holland, MI | | — | | | 716 | | | 6,534 | | | — | | | 716 | | | 6,534 | | | 7,250 | | | (518) | | | 2007/2017 | | 10/01/21 |
| Howell, MI | | — | | | 836 | | | 4,202 | | | — | | | 836 | | | 4,202 | | | 5,038 | | | (290) | | | 2003 | | 10/01/21 |
| Lansing, MI | | — | | | 1,300 | | | 11,629 | | | 3 | | | 1,300 | | | 11,632 | | | 12,932 | | | (767) | | | 1988/2015 | | 10/01/21 |
| Wyoming, MI | | — | | | 1,343 | | | 13,347 | | | — | | | 1,343 | | | 13,347 | | | 14,690 | | | (881) | | | 1964/2016 | | 10/01/21 |
| Lithonia OM (Outpatient Medical) | Lithonia, GA | | — | | | 1,676 | | | 10,871 | | | 895 | | | 1,676 | | | 11,766 | | | 13,442 | | | (1,015) | | | 2015 | | 10/01/21 |
| West Des Moines SNF (Skilled Nursing) | West Des Moines, IA | | — | | | 509 | | | 3,813 | | | — | | | 509 | | | 3,813 | | | 4,322 | | | (260) | | | 2004 | | 10/01/21 |
| Great Nord OM Portfolio (Outpatient Medical) | Tinley Park, IL | | — | | | — | | | 15,423 | | | 945 | | | — | | | 16,368 | | | 16,368 | | | (1,491) | | | 2002 | | 10/01/21 |
| Chesterton, IN | | — | | | 743 | | | 9,070 | | | 260 | | | 743 | | | 9,330 | | | 10,073 | | | (912) | | | 2007 | | 10/01/21 |
| Crown Point, IN | | — | | | 265 | | | 5,467 | | | — | | | 265 | | | 5,467 | | | 5,732 | | | (451) | | | 2005 | | 10/01/21 |
| Plymouth, MN | | — | | | 1,491 | | | 12,994 | | | 68 | | | 1,491 | | | 13,062 | | | 14,553 | | | (1,106) | | | 2014 | | 10/01/21 |
| Overland Park OM (Outpatient Medical) | Overland Park, KS | | — | | | 2,803 | | | 23,639 | | | 640 | | | 2,803 | | | 24,279 | | | 27,082 | | | (1,942) | | | 2017 | | 10/01/21 |
| Blue Badger OM (Outpatient Medical) | Marysville, OH | | — | | | 1,518 | | | 12,543 | | | 28 | | | 1,518 | | | 12,571 | | | 14,089 | | | (948) | | | 2014 | | 10/01/21 |
| Bloomington OM (Outpatient Medical) | Bloomington, IL | | — | | | 2,114 | | | 17,363 | | | — | | | 2,114 | | | 17,363 | | | 19,477 | | | (1,102) | | | 1990 | | 10/01/21 |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 2023
(in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land and Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(b) | | Land and
Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated
Depreciation
(g)(h) | | Date of
Construction | | Date
Acquired |
| Haverhill OM (Outpatient Medical) | Haverhill, MA | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,393 | | | $ | 15,477 | | | $ | 96 | | | $ | 1,393 | | | $ | 15,573 | | | $ | 16,966 | | | $ | (1,493) | | | 1987 | | 10/01/21 |
| Fresno OM (Outpatient Medical) | Fresno, CA | | — | | | 1,536 | | | 8,964 | | | 291 | | | 1,536 | | | 9,255 | | | 10,791 | | | (850) | | | 2007 | | 10/01/21 |
| Colorado Foothills OM Portfolio (Outpatient Medical) | Arvada, CO | | — | | | 695 | | | 6,369 | | | 292 | | | 695 | | | 6,661 | | | 7,356 | | | (786) | | | 1979 | | 10/01/21 |
| Centennial, CO | | — | | | 873 | | | 11,233 | | | 346 | | | 873 | | | 11,579 | | | 12,452 | | | (1,037) | | | 1979 | | 10/01/21 |
| Colorado Springs, CO | | — | | | 2,225 | | | 12,520 | | | 1,007 | | | 2,225 | | | 13,527 | | | 15,752 | | | (1,052) | | | 1999 | | 10/01/21 |
| Catalina West Haven ALF (SHOP) | West Haven, UT | | — | | | 1,936 | | | 10,415 | | | 253 | | | 1,936 | | | 10,668 | | | 12,604 | | | (697) | | | 2012 | | 10/01/21 |
| Louisiana Senior Housing Portfolio (SHOP) | Gonzales, LA | | — | | | 1,123 | | | 5,668 | | | 142 | | | 1,123 | | | 5,810 | | | 6,933 | | | (404) | | | 1996 | | 10/01/21 |
| Monroe, LA | | — | | | 834 | | | 4,037 | | | 393 | | | 834 | | | 4,430 | | | 5,264 | | | (268) | | | 1994 | | 10/01/21 |
| New Iberia, LA | | — | | | 952 | | | 5,257 | | | 54 | | | 952 | | | 5,311 | | | 6,263 | | | (357) | | | 1996 | | 10/01/21 |
| Shreveport, LA | | — | | | 1,177 | | | 6,810 | | | 54 | | | 1,177 | | | 6,864 | | | 8,041 | | | (437) | | | 1996 | | 10/01/21 |
| Slidell, LA | | — | | | 801 | | | 4,348 | | | 194 | | | 801 | | | 4,542 | | | 5,343 | | | (320) | | | 1996 | | 10/01/21 |
| Catalina Madera ALF (SHOP) | Madera, CA | | — | | | 1,312 | | | 15,299 | | | 375 | | | 1,312 | | | 15,674 | | | 16,986 | | | (1,008) | | | 2005 | | 10/01/21 |
| The Willows at Springhurst (ISHC) | Louisville, KY | | 20,800 | | | 1,876 | | | 12,595 | | | (547) | | | 1,952 | | | 11,972 | | | 13,924 | | | (702) | | | 1979 | | 01/01/22 |
| Louisville, KY | | — | | | 1,184 | | | 6,483 | | | (34) | | | 1,184 | | | 6,449 | | | 7,633 | | | (375) | | | 1979 | | 01/01/22 |
| The Willows at Harrodsburg (ISHC) | Harrodsburg, KY | | 7,125 | | | 918 | | | 10,181 | | | 1,396 | | | 1,594 | | | 10,901 | | | 12,495 | | | (567) | | | 2018 | | 05/20/22 |
| North River Health Campus (ISHC) | Evansville, IN | | 17,100 | | | 2,614 | | | 15,031 | | | 94 | | | 2,631 | | | 15,108 | | | 17,739 | | | (874) | | | 2017 | | 05/20/22 |
| Trilogy Healthcare of Jefferson III, LLC (ISHC) | Louisville, KY | | 14,175 | | | 2,265 | | | 14,077 | | | 356 | | | 2,265 | | | 14,433 | | | 16,698 | | | (722) | | | 2018 | | 05/20/22 |
| Pickerington Health Campus (ISHC) | Pickerington, OH | | 13,050 | | | 860 | | | 15,575 | | | 30 | | | 880 | | | 15,585 | | | 16,465 | | | (1,712) | | | 2019 | | 05/20/22 |
| Mt. Washington Development Project (ISHC) | Mt. Washington | | 14,325 | | | 2,054 | | | 10,225 | | | 24 | | | 2,054 | | | 10,249 | | | 12,303 | | | (578) | | | 2020 | | 05/20/22 |
| Silvercrest Health Center (ISHC) | New Albany, IN | | 20,259 | | | 1,920 | | | 24,965 | | | 352 | | | 1,920 | | | 25,317 | | | 27,237 | | | (1,018) | | | 2013 | | 08/01/22 |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 2023
(in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land and Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Cost
Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition(b) | | Land and
Improvements | | Buildings and
Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated
Depreciation
(g)(h) | | Date of
Construction | | Date
Acquired |
| The Springs of Mooresville (ISHC) | Mooresville, IN | | $ | 13,853 | | | $ | 1,460 | | | $ | 12,617 | | | $ | 99 | | | $ | 1,460 | | | $ | 12,716 | | | $ | 14,176 | | | $ | (510) | | | 2016 | | 08/01/22 |
| Hearthstone Health Campus (ISHC) | Bloomington, IN | | 19,008 | | | 2,140 | | | 16,928 | | | 202 | | | 2,160 | | | 17,110 | | | 19,270 | | | (732) | | | 2014 | | 08/01/22 |
| AHR Texas ALF Portfolio (SHOP) | Temple, TX | | 14,561 | | | 1,819 | | | 11,090 | | | 217 | | | 1,819 | | | 11,307 | | | 13,126 | | | (416) | | | 1998 | | 12/05/22 |
| Cedar Park, TX | | 5,744 | | | 1,347 | | | 5,250 | | | 114 | | | 1,347 | | | 5,364 | | | 6,711 | | | (206) | | | 1998 | | 12/05/22 |
| Corpus Christi, TX | | 14,174 | | | 1,229 | | | 12,663 | | | 98 | | | 1,229 | | | 12,761 | | | 13,990 | | | (465) | | | 1997 | | 12/05/22 |
| League City, TX | | 15,537 | | | 1,435 | | | 15,475 | | | 125 | | | 1,435 | | | 15,600 | | | 17,035 | | | (512) | | | 1999 | | 12/05/22 |
| Round Rock, TX | | 21,123 | | | 2,124 | | | 14,895 | | | 383 | | | 2,124 | | | 15,278 | | | 17,402 | | | (502) | | | 1997 | | 12/05/22 |
| Sugarland, TX | | 27,780 | | | 2,674 | | | 12,751 | | | 155 | | | 2,674 | | | 12,906 | | | 15,580 | | | (450) | | | 1999 | | 12/05/22 |
| Tyler, TX | | 9,667 | | | 1,131 | | | 10,510 | | | 103 | | | 1,131 | | | 10,613 | | | 11,744 | | | (384) | | | 1998 | | 12/05/22 |
| The Legacy at English Station (ISHC) | Louisville, KY | | 7,700 | | | 912 | | | 10,139 | | | 56 | | | 912 | | | 10,195 | | | 11,107 | | | (255) | | | 2016 | | 02/15/23 |
| The Villages at Oak Ridge (ISHC) | Washington, IN | | 12,901 | | | 1,483 | | | 11,551 | | | 1,799 | | | 1,483 | | | 13,350 | | | 14,833 | | | (174) | | | 2015 | | 07/13/23 |
| Smith's Mill Health Campus (ISHC) | New Albany, OH | | — | | | 1,323 | | | 15,271 | | | 46 | | | 1,323 | | | 15,317 | | | 16,640 | | | (255) | | | 2019 | | 07/13/23 |
| Oakwood Health Center Villas (ISHC) | Tell City, IN | | 1,988 | | | 535 | | | 1,555 | | | 131 | | | 541 | | | 1,680 | | | 2,221 | | | (47) | | | 2013 | | 07/13/23 |
| | | $ | 1,312,019 | | | $ | 325,412 | | | $ | 3,228,159 | | | $ | 355,820 | | | $ | 332,402 | | | $ | 3,576,989 | | | $ | 3,909,391 | | | $ | (627,189) | | | | | |
| Leased properties(d) | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,130 | | | $ | 84,944 | | | $ | 157,431 | | | $ | 2,051 | | | $ | 241,454 | | | $ | 243,505 | | | $ | (123,997) | | | | | |
| Construction in progress | | | 14,294 | | | 925 | | | 15,870 | | | 7,904 | | | 1,493 | | | 23,206 | | | 24,699 | | | (971) | | | | | |
| | | $ | 1,326,313 | | | $ | 327,467 | | | $ | 3,328,973 | | | $ | 521,155 | | | $ | 335,946 | | | $ | 3,841,649 | | | $ | 4,177,595 | | | $ | (752,157) | | | | | |
___________
(a)We own 100% of our properties as of December 31, 2020,2023, with the exception of Central Florida Senior Housing Portfolio,Trilogy, Lakeview IN Medical Plaza, Southlake TX Hospital, Pinnacle Beaumont ALF, Pinnacle Warrenton ALF Catalina West Haven ALF,and Louisiana Senior Housing Portfolio and Catalina Madera ALF.Portfolio.
(b)The cost capitalized subsequent to acquisition is shown net of dispositions and impairments.
(c)Properties were classifiedThese properties are used as heldcollateral for sale assetsthe secured revolver portion of the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility, which had an outstanding balance of $309,823 as of December 31, 2020.2023. See Note 9, Lines of Credit and Term Loan — 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility, for a further discussion.
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 20202023
(d)(e) The changes in total real estate for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 20182021 are as follows:follows (in thousands):
| | | | | |
| Amount |
Balance — December 31, 2017 | $ | 428,550,000 | |
Acquisitions | 320,822,000 | |
Additions | 8,985,000 | |
Dispositions | (1,369,000) | |
Balance — December 31, 2018 | $ | 756,988,000 | |
Acquisitions | $ | 184,402,000 | |
Additions | 7,117,000 | |
Dispositions | (2,389,000) | |
Balance — December 31, 2019 | $ | 946,118,000 | |
Acquisitions | $ | 60,162,000 | |
Additions | 7,980,000 | |
Dispositions and impairments | (4,068,000) | |
| Balance — December 31, 2020 | $ | 1,010,192,0002,762,272 | |
| Acquisitions | 1,225,626 | |
| Additions | 87,909 | |
| Dispositions and impairments | (36,645) | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | (590) | |
| Balance — December 31, 2021 | $ | 4,038,572 | |
| Acquisitions | $ | 254,947 | |
| Additions | 72,802 | |
| Dispositions and impairments | (123,841) | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | (6,033) | |
| Balance — December 31, 2022 | $ | 4,236,447 | |
| Acquisitions | $ | 55,658 | |
| Additions | 97,667 | |
| Dispositions and impairments | (214,906) | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | 2,729 | |
| Balance — December 31, 2023 | $ | 4,177,595 | |
(e)(f) As of December 31, 2020, for federal income tax purposes,2023, the unaudited aggregate cost of our properties is $1,123,701,000.was $4,051,405 for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
(f)(g) The changes in accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 20182021 are as follows:follows (in thousands):
| | | | | |
| Amount |
Balance — December 31, 2017 | $ | 8,885,000 | |
Additions | 16,672,000 | |
Dispositions | (245,000) | |
Balance — December 31, 2018 | $ | 25,312,000 | |
Additions | $ | 27,435,000 | |
Dispositions | (1,689,000) | |
Balance — December 31, 2019 | $ | 51,058,000 | |
Additions | $ | 31,612,000 | |
Dispositions | (424,000) | |
| Balance — December 31, 2020 | $ | 82,246,000425,272 | |
| Additions | 109,036 | |
| Dispositions and impairments | (10,320) | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | (102) | |
| Balance — December 31, 2021 | $ | 523,886 | |
| Additions | $ | 141,257 | |
| Dispositions and impairments | (9,355) | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | (950) | |
| Balance — December 31, 2022 | $ | 654,838 | |
| Additions | $ | 147,587 | |
| Dispositions and impairments | (50,790) | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | 522 | |
| Balance — December 31, 2023 | $ | 752,157 | |
(g)(h) The cost of buildings and capital improvements is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the buildings and capital improvements, up to 39 years, and the cost forof tenant improvements is depreciated over the shorter of the lease term or useful life, up to 2134 years. Furniture,The cost of furniture, fixtures and equipment is depreciated over the estimated useful life, up to 2028 years.
GRIFFIN-AMERICANAMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, IV, INC.
EXHIBITS LIST
December 31, 20202023
The following exhibits are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 20202023 (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K).
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated June 23, 2021, by and among Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV, Inc., Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV Holdings, LP, Continental Merger Sub, LLC, Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc. and Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Holdings, LP (included as Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55775) filed June 24, 2021 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| First Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement dated as of September 5, 2019, among Trilogy RER, LLC, and certain subsidiaries of Trilogy RER, LLC, Trilogy OpCo, LLC and Trilogy Pro Services, LLC, KeyBank National Association and the other lenders which are parties thereto from time to time, CIT Bank, N.A., Regions Bank, KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc., Regions Capital Markets, Bank of America, N.A. and The Huntington National Bank (included as Exhibit 10.1 to Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55434) filed September 11, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
| | |
| Unconditional Guaranty of Payment dated as of September 5, 2019, by Trilogy Investors, LLC, Trilogy Healthcare Holdings, Inc., Trilogy Pro Services, LLC and Trilogy OpCo, LLC for the benefit of KeyBank National Association and the other lenders which are parties thereto from time to time, CIT Bank, N.A., Regions Bank, KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc., Regions Capital Markets, Bank of America, N.A. and The Huntington National Bank (included as Exhibit 10.2 to Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55434) filed September 11, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
| | |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
EXHIBITS LIST — (Continued)
December 31, 2023
| | | | | | | | |
| First Amendment to the First Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement and dated as of April 30, 2021, among Trilogy RER, LLC, and certain subsidiaries of Trilogy RER, LLC, Trilogy OpCo, LLC and Trilogy Pro Services, LLC, KeyBank National Association and the other lenders which are parties thereto from time to time, CIT Bank, N.A., Regions Bank, KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc., Regions Capital Markets, Bank of America, N.A. and The Huntington National Bank (included as Exhibit 10.4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-55775) filed March 17, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
| | |
| Second Amendment to the First Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement and dated as of September 29, 2021, among Trilogy RER, LLC, and certain subsidiaries of Trilogy RER, LLC, Trilogy OpCo, LLC and Trilogy Pro Services, LLC, KeyBank National Association and the other lenders which are parties thereto from time to time, CIT Bank, N.A., Regions Bank, KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc., Regions Capital Markets, Bank of America, N.A. and The Huntington National Bank (included as Exhibit 10.5 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-55775) filed March 19, 202017, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
| | |
| Third Amendment to the First Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement and Amendment to Unconditional Guaranty of Payment and Performance dated as of December 20, 2022, among Trilogy RER, LLC, and certain subsidiaries of Trilogy RER, LLC, Trilogy OpCo, LLC and Trilogy Pro Services, LLC, KeyBank National Association and the other lenders which are parties thereto from time to time, CIT Bank, N.A., Regions Bank, KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc., Regions Capital Markets, Bank of America, N.A. and The Huntington National Bank (included as Exhibit 10.6 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-55775) filed March 17, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among American Healthcare REIT Holdings, L.P., American Healthcare REIT, Inc. and certain subsidiaries, Bank of America, N.A., KeyBank, National Association, Citizens Bank, National Association, Bank of the West, Fifth Third Bank, National Association, Truist Bank, Regions Bank, KeyBanc Capital Markets and BofA Securities, Inc. dated January 19, 2022 (included as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-055775) filed January 25, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
| | |
| First Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited PartnershipCredit Agreement dated as of Griffin-American March 1, 2023, among AmericanHealthcare REIT IV Holdings, LP, dated June 17, 2016L.P., American Healthcare REIT, Inc. and certain subsidiaries and Bank ofAmerica, N.A., KeyBank, National Association, Citizens Bank, National Association and certain lenders namedtherein (included as Exhibit 10.310.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-055775) filed March 7,2023 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
EXHIBITS LIST — (Continued)
December 31, 2023
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated February 14, 2024, by and among American Healthcare REIT Holdings, LP, American Healthcare REIT, Inc., and certain subsidiaries and Bank of America, N.A., KeyBank, National Association, Citizens Bank, National Association, Bank of the West, Barclays Banks PLC, Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, Fifth Third Bank, National Association, Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., Truist Bank, Regions Bank, Royal Bank of Canada, KeyBanc Capital Markets and BofA Securities, Inc. (included as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-41951) filed February 21, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
| | |
| Fourth Amendment to the First Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2023, among Trilogy RER, LLC and certain subsidiaries of Trilogy RER, LLC, Trilogy Investors, LLC, Trilogy Healthcare Holdings, Inc., Trilogy OpCo, LLC and Trilogy Pro Services, LLC, KeyBank National Association and the other lenders which are parties thereto from time to time (included as Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File(File No. 333-205960)for the quarter ended June 30, 2016000-55775) filed August 10, 2016May 15, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
| | |
| Dealer ManagerFifth Amendment to the First Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2023, by and among Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV, Inc., Griffin Capital Securities,Trilogy RER, LLC and Griffin-Americancertain subsidiaries of Trilogy RER, LLC, Trilogy Investors, LLC, Trilogy Healthcare REIT IV Advisor,Holdings, Inc., Trilogy OpCo, LLC dated February 16, 2016and Trilogy Pro Services, LLC, KeyBank National Association and the other lenders which are parties thereto from time to time (included as Exhibit 10.310.25 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K(FilePre- Effective Amendment No. 333-205960) for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed March 7, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| | |
| Griffin-AmericanExtension Letter to the First Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of September 5, 2023, among Trilogy RER, LLC, certain subsidiaries of Trilogy RER, LLC, Trilogy Investors, LLC, Trilogy Healthcare REIT IV,Holdings, Inc. 2015 Incentive Plan (including the 2015 Independent Directors Compensation Sub-Plan), Trilogy OpCo, LLC, Trilogy Pro Services, LLC, and KeyBank National Association (included as Exhibit 10.410.23 to Pre-effectivePre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-205960)333-267464) filed January 5, 2016November 7, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
| | |
| Amendment No. 1 to Dealer ManagerMembership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2023, by and among Griffin-AmericanGAHC3 Trilogy JV, LLC, American Healthcare REIT, IV, Inc., Griffin Capital Securities,Trilogy Holdings NT-HCI, LLC and Griffin-AmericanNorthStar Healthcare REIT IV Advisor, LLC, dated June 17, 2016 (includedIncome Operating Partnership, LP (included as Exhibit 10.210.1 to our QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q8-K (File No. 000-557(File No. 333-205960)75 for the quarter ended June 30, 2016) filed August 10, 2016November 7, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT IV, INC.
EXHIBITS LIST — (Continued)
December 31, 2020
| | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| 101.INS* | Inline XBRL Instance Document –- the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL Document | |
| | |
| 101.SCH* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
| | |
| 101.CAL* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
| | |
| 101.DEF* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | |
| | |
| 101.LAB* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
| | |
| 101.PRE* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | |
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT, INC.
EXHIBITS LIST — (Continued)
December 31, 2023
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| 104* | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) | |
_________
| | | | | |
| * | Filed herewith. |
| ** | Furnished herewith. In accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference. |
| † | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Griffin-AmericanAmerican Healthcare REIT, IV, Inc.
(Registrant) | |
| | | | |
| By | | /s/ JDEFFREYANNY T. HPANSONROSKY | | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of DirectorsPresident |
| | Jeffrey T. HansonDanny Prosky | | |
| | |
Date: March 26, 202122, 2024 | | |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| By | | /s/ JDEFFREYANNY T. HPANSONROSKY | | Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of DirectorsDirector |
| | Jeffrey T. HansonDanny Prosky | | (Principal Executive Officer) |
| | | | |
Date: March 26, 202122, 2024 | | |
| | | | |
| By | | /s/ BRIAN S. PEAY | | Chief Financial Officer |
| | Brian S. Peay | | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
| | | | |
Date: March 26, 202122, 2024 | | |
| | | | |
| By | | /s/ JEFFREY T. HANSON | | Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors |
| | Jeffrey T. Hanson | | |
| | | | |
| Date: March 22, 2024 | | |
| | | | |
| By | | /s/ RMICHARDATHIEU S. WB. SELCHTREIFF | | Director |
| | Richard S. WelchMathieu B. Streiff | | |
| | | | |
Date: March 26, 202122, 2024 | | |
| | | | |
| By | | /s/ SCOTT A. ESTES | | Independent Director |
| | Scott Estes | | |
| | | | |
| Date: March 22, 2024 | | |
| | | | |
| By | | /s/ BRIAN J. FLORNES | | Independent Director |
| | Brian J. Flornes | | |
| | | | |
Date: March 26, 202122, 2024 | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| By | | /s/ DIANNE HURLEY | | Independent Director |
| | Dianne Hurley | | |
| | | | |
Date: March 26, 202122, 2024 | | |
| | | | |
| By | | /s/ MARVIN R. O’QUINN | | Independent Director |
| | Marvin R. O’Quinn | | |
| | | | |
| Date: March 22, 2024 | | |
| | | | |
| By | | /s/ VALERIE RICHARDSON | | Independent Director |
| | Valerie Richardson | | |
| | | | |
| Date: March 22, 2024 | | |
| | | | |
| By | | /s/ WILBURH. SMITHIII | | Independent Director |
| | Wilbur H. Smith III | | |
| | | | |
Date: March 26, 202122, 2024 | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
