UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 
FORM 10-K
 
(Mark One)
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172021

or
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the transition period from              to  
COMMISSION FILE NO. 001-36905
 
SeaSpine Holdings Corporation
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
 
DELAWAREDelaware47-3251758
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF

INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)
(I.R.S. EMPLOYER

IDENTIFICATION NO.)
5770 Armada Drive, Carlsbad, California92008
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)(ZIP CODE)
5770 Armada Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code) (country)
REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (760) 727-8399


SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
Title of Each ClassTrading Symbol(s)Name of Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock Par Value $.01 Per ShareSPNEThe Nasdaq StockGlobal Select Market LLC

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes   o   No  x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act. Yes  o
 No  x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   x   


1



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated fileroAccelerated filer
x
Large acceleratedNon-accelerated fileroAccelerated filerSmaller reporting company
x
Non-accelerated filer
o  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting companyo
Emerging growth company
x
o
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.  x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  o    No  x

As of Junethe last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2017,2021), the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $109,009,256$603,380,737 based upon the closing sales price of the registrant’s common stock on The Nasdaq Global Select Market on such date. The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock,common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding as of February 26, 2018March 7, 2022 was 14,537,751.36,791,003.


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Certain portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its scheduled May 30, 20182022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (scheduled for June 2, 2022) are incorporated by reference in Part III of this report.




2










SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
INDEX
 




3






PART I




This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Form 10-K” or this “report”) contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that involve risks and uncertainties. Many of the forward-looking statements are located in Part II, Item 7 of this report under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Forward-looking statements provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. Forward-looking statements can also be identified by words such as “future,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “predicts,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “can,” “may,” and similar terms. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and our actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Part I, Item 1A of this report under the heading “Risk Factors,” which are incorporated herein by reference. We assume no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason, except as required by law.

The terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “SeaSpine” or the “Company” refer collectively to SeaSpine Holdings Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, unless otherwise stated. All information presented in this report is based on our fiscal year. Unless otherwise stated, references to particular years, quarters, months or periods refer to our fiscal years ending December 31 and the associated quarters, months and periods of those fiscal years.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

SeaSpine isWe are a global medical technology company focused on the design, development and commercialization of surgical solutions for the treatment of patients suffering from spinal disorders. SeaSpine hasWe have a comprehensive portfolio of orthobiologics and spinal implantsimplant solutions, as well as a surgical navigation system, to meet the varying combinations of products that neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons need to perform fusion procedures onin the lumbar, thoracic and cervical spine. SeaSpine’sWe believe this broad combined portfolio is essential to meet the “complete solution” requirements of these surgeons. We report revenue in two product categories: (i) orthobiologics and (ii) spinal implants and enabling technologies. Our orthobiologics products consist of a broad range of advanced and traditional bone graft substitutes that are designed to improve bone fusion rates following a wide range of orthopedic surgeries, including spine, hip, and extremities procedures. SeaSpine’sOur spinal implants and enabling technologies portfolio consists of an extensive line of products and image-guided surgical solutions to facilitate spinal fusion in degenerative, minimally invasive surgery (MIS), and complex spine,spinal deformity and degenerative procedures. Expertise in both orthobiologic sciences and spinal implants, software and advanced optics product development allows SeaSpine to offer its surgeon customers a differentiated portfolio and a complete solution to meet their patients' fusion requirements. SeaSpineWe currently markets itsmarket our products in the United States and in overapproximately 30 countries worldwide.

SeaSpine was incorporated in Delaware on February 12, 2015 in connection with the spin-off of the orthobiologics and spinal implants business of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (Integra), a diversified medical technology company. The spin-off occurred on July 1, 2015. Our corporate offices are located at 5770 Armada Drive, Carlsbad, California.

Spine Anatomy

The spine is a column of bone and cartilage that consists of 33 interlocking bones, called vertebrae, which stack upon each other at a slight angle to form the spine’s S-shaped curve. With the exception ofExcept for the bottom nine vertebrae, the vertebrae are separated by thin regions of cartilage known as intervertebral discs, which act as shock absorbers that facilitate motion and absorb stress during movement. The spine protects the spinal cord and acts as the core of the human skeleton, extending from the base of the skull to the pelvis. Soft tissues, including ligaments, tendons and muscles, are attached to the vertebrae and provide stability to the vertebral segment. The spinal cord carries nerves that exit through openings between the vertebrae and deliver sensation and control to the body. Below is a diagram of the lateral view of the spine:


4






spne-20211231_g1.jpg


The spine consists of five regions, of which the cervical, thoracic and lumbar are the three primary regions. The cervical region consists of the seven vertebrae extending from the base of the skull to the shoulders. The thoracic, or central, region consists of the next twelve vertebrae in the middle of the back. Each vertebra in the thoracic region is connected to two ribs that protect the body’s vital organs. Below the thoracic region, the lumbar region consists of five vertebrae in the lower back and is the primary load-bearing region of the spine. The thoracic and lumbar regions are commonly referred to ascalled thoracolumbar and many of the products and procedures to treat these regions are similar. The final two regions of the spine, the sacrum and coccyx, consist of nine naturally fused vertebrae connected to the hip bones to provide support for the spine.

In spinal fusion procedures, two or more vertebrae are fused to eliminate instability as a result of deformity, degeneration or trauma affecting the vertebrae and intervertebral discs. During the procedure, spinal implant products are used to decompress, align, and stabilize the spine and the surgeon will often remove the damaged intervertebral disc and replace it with a bone graft substitute to allow new bone to grow and to fuse the affected vertebrae together. In addition to the bone graft substitute, the surgeon may replace the removed disc with an interbody device. An interbody device, which may be made out of machined bone, titanium, 3D-printed titanium or polyetheretherketone (PEEK), and is designed to maintain spine alignment and appropriate spacing while allowing bone to grow between the vertebrae to achieve bone fusion. Procedures that include the implantation of interbody devices are often referred to by the surgical approach used to place the interbody device in the disc space. A lateral lumbar interbody fusion uses an approach that accesses the spine from the side of the patient’s body; a posterior lateral interbody fusion uses a direct posterior approach from the patient’s back; a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion uses an angled approach from either the left or right side of the back; and an anterior lumbar interbody fusion uses a direct anterior approach from the patient’s front (stomach) area.

Our Competitive Strengths

We provideare dedicated to providing a broadcomprehensive portfolio of advancedinnovative, procedurally focused products designed to work together to drive fusion. The latest advancements in bone biology and traditionalmaterials science guide the development of in-house manufactured advanced orthobiologics and proprietary spinal implant solutionstechnology engineered to assistaddress the many nuances of spinal pathology. The integration of our surgeon customersproducts with our proprietary machine vision FLASHTM surgical navigation system has produced market leading surgical workflows, while greatly reducing harmful radiation to all stakeholders and individuals involved in treatingsurgical procedures. Our products can be tailored to meet individual patient needs, delivering both clinical and economic value to patients, suffering from spinalsurgeons, and other orthopedic disorders.hospital systems. Our executive management team has extensive experience in the spine and medical technology industries. We believe that our management team, combined with the following competitive strengths, will enable us to continue to grow our revenue and increase our presence in the markets we serve.
Our Integrated Orthobiologics Business drives alignment and priorities across research and development, marketing, quality and manufacturing operations designed to deliver clinical value through best of class, cost effective products, the vast majority of which are processed in-house. By controlling the design, manufacturing, and quality processes, we believe that we serve.are better able to control the overall product quality and consistency while also providing cost of goods advantage and operational leverage with volume increases.

Our focused R&D team and disciplined development process optimizes our new products by isolating the manufacturing elements to optimize product performance and ultimately deliver differentiated products.
An extensiveWe are investing in various studies to differentiate our products with science and differentiated offeringdata. Most notably, we sponsored a study comparing two leading Cellular Bone Grafts with our Strand Plus demineralized bone fibers that was published in 2020 in the Journal of orthobiologics products. We offer a broad range of differentiated orthobiologics productsBone and Joint Surgery (JBJS). The study concluded that better positions us to meet the needs of our surgeon customers compared to our competitors who focus primarily on spinal implant products. For example, our proprietary Accellcells in cellular bone matrix technology is designed to provide both immediate and sustained availability of the natural array of osteoinductive(CBM) products did not improve fusion or bone proteins and, in addition, provides flexibility in handling as a result of its reverse-phase carrier. We estimate we have a 14% share of the demineralized bone matrices (DBM) market in the United States.
formation. The study also demonstrated that SeaSpine’s
A range of innovative, PEEK interbody devices that incorporate NanoMetalene, a proprietary titanium surface technology. We currently offer a wide range of sterile-packaged interbody devices that incorporate our proprietary

NanoMetalene surface technology and we expect to continue to launch additional products incorporating NanoMetalene technology. NanoMetalene describes a sub-micron layer of commercially pure titanium molecularly bonded to a PEEK implant using a high-energy, low-temperature process referred to as atomic fusion deposition. NanoMetalene is designed to provide implants a bone-friendly titanium surface on endplates and throughout graft apertures, while retaining the benefits associated with traditional PEEK implants, such as biocompatibility, a modulus of elasticity similar to bone, and excellent radiographic visibility for post-operative imaging. We have exclusive rights to NanoMetalene technology within the spine market.5


5






demineralized bone matrix (DBM) product, OsteoStrand Plus, outperformed the tested CBM product.This study substantiates payor and provider pushback for cellular bone grafts, and, combined with the previously published pre-clinical study comparing the OsteoStrand DBM fibers to six leading competitive DBMs, provides strong scientific support for SeaSpine’s differentiated DBM offerings.We will continue to invest in preclinical and clinical data to evidence our products and their clinical value.
A synergistic channel strategy for orthobiologics products. We maintain aOur dual branding strategy that allows usour team to market our orthobiologics products through independent sales agents who carry competitive spinal implant products. For example,Specifically, we market our advanced DBM product as both Accell Evo3orthobiologics under the SeaSpine and OsteoSurge300,IsoTis brands, which allows sales agents who sell spinal implant products competitive with ours to continue to represent our orthobiologics products. We believe this dual branding strategy allows us to penetrate a greater number of customer accounts than we would otherwise serve if we marketed our orthobiologics products under a single brand.
The combination of these elements along with a strengthened distribution channel, has earned SeaSpine the #2 position in the US DBM market which is a critical factor for our continued access to IDN (independent distributor network) and GPO (group purchasing organization) networks.
Our own orthobiologics design, developmentFusion Engineered™ Spinal Implant Systems are available with multiple material and manufacturing operations. While many of our spinal implant competitors source their orthobiologics products from original equipment manufacturerssurface technology options developed specifically to supplement their spinal implant portfolio, we design and develop a majoritycomplement the strengths of our orthobiologics products internallyproducts. The modularity of these systems provides versatility while minimizing the amount of inventory required for each surgery.
A range of innovative PEEK interbody devices that incorporate NanoMetalene with Reef TopographyTM, a proprietary titanium surface technology. We currently offer a wide range of sterile-packaged interbody devices that incorporate our proprietary NanoMetalene surface technology with Reef Topography. NanoMetalene is a surface technology for interbody implants that incorporates a sub-micron layer of commercially pure titanium bonded to a PEEK implant using a high-energy, low-temperature process called atomic fusion deposition. NanoMetalene is designed to provide a bone-friendly titanium surface on the entire surface of the implant while retaining the benefits associated with traditional PEEK implants, such as biocompatibility, a modulus of elasticity similar to bone, and manufacture them at our facilityexcellent radiographic visibility for both Intra and post-operative imaging. Reef Topography incorporates machined macrostructures and undercut features that pre-clinical studies show improve early biomechanical stability. Reef is designed to act as an integrated fusion scaffolding that increases surface area for new bone to grow onto and into the interbody device. We have exclusive rights to NanoMetalene and Reef Topography technologies within the spine market.
A line of Waveform™ interbody implants offering the next level of 3D-printed titanium architectural innovation. Waveform™ technology balances key geometric and manufacturing advancements without compromising clinical requirements to deliver a highly porous and robust interbody solution. The interbody design is intended to balance subsidence resistance, implant stiffness, and bone graft packability, while maintaining radiographic visualization during intraoperative and postoperative imaging.
An expandable posterior interbody solution that offers both parallel and lordotic expansion options to fit both the patient’s need as well as surgeon preference. The Explorer™ TO system provides a low-profile design for insertion with expansion versatility achieving up to 16mm in Irvine, California. By controllingheight or up to 20 degrees of lordosis. The streamlined and intuitive instrumentation provides the manufacturing processes, we should be ableability to better controlpack biologics through the costimplant into the disc space after expansion.
Modular solutions across the portfolio intended maximize clinical versatility, while minimizing the complexity and increased inventory requirements of non-modular systems. One of our productsfoundational systems that incorporates modular technology is our Mariner Posterior Fixation Platform. The Mariner System is designed to address a wide range of pathologies with an efficient set of instruments and provide operational leveragemodular implants. Surgeons use Mariner to accommodate conventional, as well as minimally invasive approaches to treat degenerative and complex spine pathologies with volume increases.a minimum number of trays. This allows surgeons to effectively and efficiently use the most appropriate surgical techniques to address each unique patient condition.

Our FLASHTM Navigation Platform with 7D Technology has redefined image guided surgery, delivering a navigation platform with meaningful benefits in spine and cranial procedures. The speed, accuracy, efficiency, and intraoperative radiation-free safety profile of the FLASHTM Navigation System delivers significant economic value, while eliminating the long-standing frustrations and challenges of traditional image guided navigation systems.
Near Instant and Optimized Workflow Efficiency. Proprietary 7D Machine-Vision Technology utilizes visible light to deliver a registration method in less than 30 seconds, providing a “navigation-on-demand” experience for the surgeon without altering or disrupting the surgical workflow. Studies have shown that registration time utilizing FLASHTM Navigation is reduced up to 95% compared to competitor navigation systems. The technology is also designed to optimize the experience for the surgeon by offering a completely surgeon-controlled platform.

6




High Accuracy with Real-Time Navigation. The FLASHTM Navigation System provides real-time surgical navigation and informed decision making through a 3D image acquisition of nearly 1,000,000 data points. This registration method is designed to allow a surgeon to achieve segmental accuracy at every level regardless of patient positioning or intraoperative movement.
Radiation-Free Intraoperative Navigation Technology. Visible light Machine-Vision Technology eliminates the need for intraoperative radiation used for registration typically required for navigation procedures. The FLASHTM Navigation System safety profile eliminates unnecessary radiation to the surgeon, staff, and patient and potentially reduces the harmful long-term side effects of radiation exposure.
Comprehensive & Cost-Effective Navigation Solution. The FLASHTM Navigation System delivers a comprehensive and cost-effective mobile platform with a small footprint designed for use in multiple surgical specialties. The proprietary FLASHTM registration method also significantly reduces registration time from 30 minutes to less than 30 seconds, resulting in faster operative times. In addition, the intraoperative radiation-free technology eliminates the need for and reliance on harmful intraoperative radiation equipment and associated personnel.
Our Strategy

Our goal is to continue to scale our business in order to enhance our market position in orthobiologics and become a leader in the spinal implant and image guided surgery market. To achieve our goal, we are investing in the followingthese strategies:

Research and development to bring new products and techniques to market. We have recently increased, and intend to continue to increase, our annual research and development spending as a percentage of revenue in an effort to drive higher revenue growth through new product sales. We plan to continue to invest resources to further expand our product portfolio and to develop additional next-generation products for our existing core product lines. We also plan to continue to work with our surgeon customers to understand their needs and develop new and next-generation orthobiologics, spinal implants and spinal implantimage guidance products that willdesigned to improve clinical outcomes. We intend to make further investments in our infrastructure and we employ dedicated orthobiologics engineers and scientists with expertise in material sciences, and biology and hardware engineers with expertise in product design and development.
Our expanded team also has significant software expertise to provide surgeons with real-time clinically relevant feedback to assist with the surgical decision making process.
Commercial infrastructure to further penetrate the U.S. orthobiologics and spinal implant markets and increase our focus in international markets wherewhich we currently have a presence. compete. We have recently increased, and intend to continue to increase, the quality, size, exclusivity and geographic breadth of our sales management team and network of independent sales agents in the United States. To support these efforts, we are investing more in, and are developing comprehensive support for, sales agent and surgeon training and education programs. We have a hands-on cadaveric training facilityfacilities in Carlsbad, California and Wayne, Pennsylvania where we provideour team provides training for surgeons and sales agents. In addition, we plan to increase our presence within teaching institutions that provide spinal surgery fellowship programs to educate new surgeons on the use of our products. We believe these combined efforts will help surgeons become adept with our spinal implant products and techniques, thereby improving outcomes for their patients. Internationally, we intend to continue to focus our sales
Pre-clinical and marketing efforts on expanding and strengthening our presence in those markets where we currently have relationships with stocking distributors and to selectively expand into new markets.
Clinical affairspost-market clinical study programs to generate data on product efficacy. data. We plan to invest in additionalfurther development of our pre-clinical and clinical development programs designed to generate peer-reviewed clinical datascientific evidence and a podium presence that we believe will validatesupport the efficacyperformance of select orthobiologics and spinal implant solutions overthat may be compared to competing technologies. Specifically, weWe believe that our NanoMetalene, technology hasReef Topography and WaveFormTM technologies may have advantages over many existing implant materials.materials and surface options, and that our fibers-based OsteoStrand® and OsteoStrand Plus tissue products are more efficacious and cost-effective than, higher cost cellular allografts bone grafts. We have initiated studiesare also investing in additional clinical data for our machine vision FLASHTM navigation system to generate data ondemonstrate the unique surface characteristicssignificant reduction in intraoperative radiation in the operating room with the additional benefit of titanium and the mechanical properties and radiolucency of PEEK interbody implants, which NanoMetalene technology combines into a single device.
greatly reducing surgical procedure times.
Opportunities to enhance our product offering through strategic alliances and acquisitions. We currently market several products under distribution agreements and licenses with third-parties. We intend to continue to pursue alliances and acquisition opportunities that we believe will provide us with technologies to strengthen our market position and grow our business.

For example, in September 2021, we entered into an exclusive distribution agreement with OrthoPediatrics Corp under which it will exclusively distribute the 7D Surgical FLASHTM system for pediatric applications.
Our Products

We offer a portfolio of orthobiologics, spinal implants and spinal implantenabling technologies products for the treatment of patients suffering from spinal and other orthopedic disorders. Information regarding the amount and percentage of total revenue contributed by our orthobiologics and spinal implantimplants and enabling technologies products for each of the last threetwo fiscal years may be found in Part II, Item 7 of this report under the sections entitled “Year Ended December 31, 20172021 Compared to Year

7



Ended December 31, 2016—Revenue” and “Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015—2020—Revenue” and in Part II, Item 8 of this report in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Note 12,10, “Segment and Geographic Information.”






Orthobiologics

Our orthobiologics products are used in orthopedic and dental procedures and consist of a broad range of traditional and advanced bone graft substitutes intended to address the key elements of bone regeneration - osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osteogenesis. Osteoinduction refers to the ability of an implant to stimulate bone forming cells based primarily on soluble growth factor signals. Osteoconduction refers to the ability of an implant to promote bone formation based primarily on a physical matrix or scaffold, when placed adjacent to viable bone tissue. Osteogenesis refers to the ability to promote new bone formation based primarily on the cells contained within the bone graft.

regeneration.
Bone graft substitutes composed of natural biologic proteins and synthetic materials are designed to reduce the amount of autologous bone grafts needed for spinal fusion procedures. Bone graft substitutes, depending on their design, can be used entirely in place of the patient’s own bone tissue, referred to ascalled an autograft, or by extending the volume of bone graft material from the patient by combining it with the bone graft substitute.

Our orthobiologics portfolio includes particulatefibers-based and fibers-basedparticulate DBM, collagen ceramic matrices, demineralized cancellous allograft bone and synthetic bone void fillers. We offer our orthobiologics products in the form of fibers, putties, pastes, strips and DBM in a resorbable mesh for a range of surgical applications.

Demineralized Bone Matrix and Accell Technology

Demineralized bone matrixDBM formulations are designed to provide proteins and other growth factors at varying stages of the bone healing process. Developed in the early 1990s, our first-generation demineralized bone matrixDBM formulations combined particulate-demineralized bone matrix with an inert carrier engineered for easy graft handling and graft containment. The carrier is a biocompatible synthetic polymer with an advantageous property that allows the product to remain moldable at room temperature, but becomes more viscous at body temperature once implanted, which we refer to ascall reverse-phase. Subsequently, we developed a proprietary process to transform particulate-based demineralized bone matrixDBM into a dispersed form in order to enhance the performance of the graft material. The result of this process was a demineralized bone matrixDBM product that we refer to ascall Accell bone matrix.Bone Matrix. Accell bone matrixBone Matrix is an open structured, dispersed form of DBM, which increases the bioavailability of bone proteins at an earlier time in the healing cascade. Standard particulate DBM is dense and therefore the bone proteins release more slowly and in a sustained manner over time. The properties of Accell bone matrixBone Matrix and DBM are both desirable, which is why our advanced DBM products include both of these components to harness both the early and sustained release of bone proteins. Our Accell Evo3 and OsteoSurge 300 DBM products provide an optimized formulation of Accell bone matrix,Bone Matrix, particulate-based demineralized bone matrix,DBM, and our reverse-phase carrier. These products have a handling property for bone grafting procedures and contain three times the amount of the Accell bone matrixBone Matrix compared to earlier products. We believe that providing both the early-stage and late-stage accessibility of osteoinductive bone proteins provided by a composite of Accell bone matrixBone Matrix and the particulate-based demineralized matrix differentiates our product compared to competitive demineralized bone matrixDBM products.

In late 2017, we conducted a limited commercial launch of our OsteoStrand™Our OsteoStrand® and Strand™Strand® Demineralized Bone Fibers product lines as well as our OsteoStrand Plus and Strand Plus product lines, which incorporate our proprietary Accell Bone Matrix. All of these productsMatrix, provide 100% demineralized bone fibers and are designed to facilitate and aid in fusion by maximizing osteoinductive content while providing an improved conductive matrix. The fibers were developed through a process that evaluated a variety of fiber geometries to deliveroptimize osteoinductivity and osteoconductivity, intraoperative handling and controlled expansion in order to facilitate surgical placement, to maintain surgical position and to allow the fibers to better fill the surgical defect with the overriding goal to improve fusion potential.

In addition, in late 2017, we conducted a limited commercial launch of our OsteoBallast™Our OsteoBallast® and Ballast™Ballast® Demineralized Bone Matrix in Resorbable Mesh product lines which are also designed to facilitate and aid in fusion. These products, which consist of a resorbable mesh containing 100% DBM without a carrier, are designed to simplify graft placement and help prevent graft migration while maximizing DBM content. OsteoBallastOsteoBallast® is designed to provide surgeons with a simple means for delivering bone graft in posterior spine surgery that contours to the local anatomy while maintaining shape and volume under compression. The simplified technique is intended to be particularly valuable in MIS procedures, where placing the graft accurately through tubes and small incisions can be challenging.

Similarly, our OsteoBallast MT and Ballast MT resorbable mesh pouches are designed to simplify graft containment and resist graft migration while allowing surgeons to customize the graft containment length and to utilize the patient's autograft.
We believe that our recently launched and existing product offerings deliver clinical value as payors and hospitals seek more cost effective orthobiologic solutions.


78






Collagen Ceramic Matrix Technologies

Our collagen ceramic matrix technology leverages a history of regenerative technology and collagen engineering. Our leading products in this category are currently marketed as IsoTis Mozaik and OsteoStrux and are engineered to provide a porous scaffold architecture and osteoconductivity. These products also support osteogenesis, as they are indicated for use with bone marrow aspirate, which contains osteogenic cells. These products are composed of highly purified beta-tricalcium phosphate granules, which provide mineral content to foster bone formation during the healing process in a framework of type-1 collagen that provides a scaffold for bone cell migration. These products are engineered with a resorption profile consistent with the rate of natural bone formation.

Other Bone Graft Substitutes

Our other bone graft substitute products consist of allograft cancellous bone scaffolds and synthetic bone void fillers.

Spinal Implants and Enabling Technologies

Our spinal implantimplants and enabling technology portfolio consists of an extensive line of products for spinal decompression, alignment, stabilization and stabilization.image-guided surgical solutions as well as a surgical navigation system designed for broad spectrum use throughout the entire spinal column. Such products are typically used to facilitate fusion in degenerative, minimally invasive, and complex spinal deformity and degenerative procedures throughout the lumbar, thoracic and cervical regions of the spine. Our products are increasingly focused on restoring adequate spinal balance and profile in the sagittal (front to back) plane, which we believe is widely recognized as an important factor to improve the quality of life in patients undergoing surgery for spinal degeneration or deformity.

Degenerative
    Our degenerative products include systems used in open and MIS procedures. Open procedures are still the most common surgical approach and involve a midline incision followed by retraction of the skin and soft tissues. We offer an extensive portfolio of degenerative products designed for use in both thoracolumbar and cervical spine cases.
Our innovative line of composite PEEK interbody devices featuring NanoMetalene surface technology with Reef Topography with various footprint and lordotic options, is designed to maintain spine alignment and appropriate spacing while allowing bone to grow between the vertebrae to achieve bone fusion. Our Reef-TO, Reef-TA and Reef-TH interbody devices for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures can be used to fuse the lumbar spine through a posterior approach that starts off to one side of the patient’s back. Our Vu a∙POD™ Prime NanoMetalene® and Reef-A interbody devices for anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedures can be used to fuse the spine through an anterior approach. Our Regatta NanoMetalene Lateral System is a comprehensive lateral lumbar interbody system that can be used to fuse the spine through a lateral approach. Our Cambria NanoMetalene interbody device can be used to fuse the cervical spine through an anterior approach. Our Shoreline® Anterior Cervical Standalone System, featuring the NanoMetalene with Reef Topography, is a modular plate and interbody device designed to maximize intraoperative flexibility to address a wide range of anatomy, surgical situations or bone in anterior cervical fusions.
Since 2020, we launched our 3D-printed interbody fusion devices under our Waveform™ brand for anterior cervical, transforaminal lumbar,lateral lumbar and articulating transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
We launched the next generation of our Explorer™ TO expandable interbody device system with complementary lordotic and parallel expanding implant options in 2020 under a limited commercial launch and plan to fully launch the system with additional footprints and other offerings in 2022.
We offer a comprehensive portfolio of spinal fixation products for the cervical, thoracic and lumbar regions of the spine, consisting of rods, screws, plates and instrumentation to facilitate spinal decompression and fusion. In 2021, we launched the NorthStar OCT Posterior Cervical Fixation System and the AdmiralTM Anterior Cervical Plating System (ACP).The NorthStar system’s novel instrumentation and anatomically designed implants are intended to provide a safe and effective solution designed to improve surgical flow when navigating through complex cervical procedures. The Admiral ACP system represents the next generation of ACP and was designed to strike a balance between strength, profile and construct rigidity.



9




Our Mariner Posterior Fixation System is a pedicle screw system for open and MIS procedures and adult deformity procedures featuring modular threaded technology and accompanying instrumentation designed to reduce the number of trays needed for surgery and that provides surgeons with multiple intra-operative options to facilitate posterior lumbar fixation. We also offer a variety of screw and plating systems, such as our Admiral™ ACP System, that combine large graft viewing windows and a visual confirmation locking system for cervical fixation.
Minimally Invasive Surgery

MIS procedures are less invasive than traditional open surgery procedures, and may result in reduced post-operative pain, faster rates of healing and fewer procedure complications by minimizing incision size and tissue dissection. Our surgeon customers utilize our iPassage™ MIS Retractors, and NewPort™ Tube Retractors, and new pedicle screw-based Mariner MIS Retractors to perform MIS fusions and decompression procedures, a surgical technique used to alleviate pain caused from compression on the spinal cord or the nerves that emanate from it. During the procedure, the surgeon makes a small incision and inserts the retractor through the skin and soft tissues down to the spinal column, creating a tunnel to the spine. The retractor is kept in place to hold the muscles open throughout the procedure. Through this tunnel, the surgeon accesses the spine using small instruments and inserts implants necessary for fusion, such as the screws and rods of our NewPortMariner MIS Posterior Fixation System and Coral®NewPort MIS solutions. The Mariner MIS Posterior Fixation System features low-profile, robust towers for rod introduction and reduction as well as ultra-tough modular extended tab heads, capable of providing powerful instrumented compression and distraction of the spine. Our NewPort MIS product has extended tabs for a small incision profile and offers two rod delivery options for both mini-open and percutaneous approaches. Our Coral MIS product offers a mini-open muscle splitting rod delivery option for surgeons new to MIS procedures. Our MIS portfolio also includes a comprehensive set of decompression instruments, static and expandable interbody devices, and screw systems designed to facilitate access to the treatment area while minimizing anatomical disruption.

Complex Spinal Deformity
Complex Spine and Deformity

Our spinal implant products are used in complex spine andspinal deformity procedures involving multiple spine segments, challenging anatomy, tumors, traumatic injury and revision of previous fusion surgeries. We define deformity as any variation in the natural curvature of the spine, the most common of which is scoliosis, an abnormal lateral curvature of the spine. We offer several technologies designed to address the needs of our surgeon customers who perform complex deformity procedures and the various derotation techniques that they use to correct spine curvature. For example, our Daytona® Deformity System uses an extended tab uniplanar and polyaxial screws with multiple rod options and intuitive instrumentation to create a versatile system adaptable to surgeon preference. In 2017, we launched an extension of theOur Daytona DeformitySmall Stature System, platform withwhich has an adolescent idiopathic scoliosis indication, that is designed to address standard to complex deformity cases in smaller-sized patients who need a lower profile construct due to anatomy constraints. OurWe provide our systems are provided in multiple configurations and materials to address patient requirements, including stainless steel, titanium alloy and cobalt chrome alloy rod options, as well as multiple rod diameters. The ability to offerOffering products with varying rod diameter and materials provides the surgeon different rod stiffness to treat individual patients. We offer both implant- and instrument-based reduction capabilities with our extended tab and locking cap products, as well as our uniplanar and D-planar screws and rapid sequential reduction towers. The Mariner Outrigger Revision System is an adjunct to the Mariner Posterior Fixation System designed to effectively revise and extend previous fusions. Our complex spinal implant portfolio allows surgeons to combine various product lines and approaches, offering several treatment options for the most difficult cases. In 2021, we extended the Mariner modular platform to address complex spine adult deformity pathologies.

Enabling Technologies


8




Degenerative

Our degenerative products include systems that are typicallymachine vision FLASHTM navigation platform is used in open procedures. Open procedures are still the most common surgical approach and involve a midline incision followed by retraction of the skin and soft tissues. We offer an extensive portfolio of degenerative products that are designed for use in both thoracolumbar and cervical spine cases.

Our Hollywood, Hollywood VI, and Ventura NanoMetalene interbody device for transforaminal lumbar interbody
fusion procedures can be used to fuse the lumbar spine through a posterior approach that starts off to one side of the patient’s back and our Vu a∙POD™ Prime NanoMetalene® interbody device for anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedures can be used to fuse the spine through an anterior approach. Our Cambria NanoMetalene interbody device can be used to fuse the cervical spine through an anterior approach.

Thoracolumbar

We offer a comprehensive portfolio of products for the thoracic and lumbar regions of the spine, consisting of rods, screws and instrumentation to facilitate posterior lumbar fusion and a broad range of anterior, posterior and lateral interbody devices, including stand-alone, zero-profile and low-profile systems, traditional static PEEK and NanoMetalene interbody devices with various footprint and lordotic options, and parallel and lordotic expandable interbody systems. Our Mariner Posterior Fixation System is a pedicle screw system featuring modular threaded technology and accompanying instrumentation that is designed to reduce the number of trays needed for surgery and that provides surgeons with multiple intra-operative options to facilitate posterior lumbar fixation. We also offer our Malibu and Coral screw and plating systems for treating degenerative thoracolumbar spine cases.

Cervical

We offer a range of devices to treat disorders in the cervical region of the spine. Our degenerative cervical portfolio includes a full range of PEEK and NanoMetalene interbody devices in a variety of footprintposterior spinal procedures, including degenerative, deformity, tumor, trauma, and lordotic options, including stand-alone zero-profile,revision surgery. The platform can be utilized in MIS, Mini-Open, or Open techniques. The technology also offers a comprehensive cranial platform for use in cranial neurosurgery.

Our innovative FLASHTM Navigation System with 7D Technology delivers a navigation platform with our proprietary 7D Technology that utilizes visible light, machine-vision cameras, and low-profile systemsadvanced software algorithms to create a 3D image for surgical navigation. The novel technology allows for a fast image reconstruction for surgical navigation with integrated or modular plate options. These products includeno disruption to surgeon workflow and eliminates radiation exposure during the procedure to the patient, surgeon, and staff.
Our Spine Module is our recently introduced Shoreline® Anterior Cervical Standalone System, which is designed to maximize intraoperative flexibility by offering a full complementleading product in the FLASHTM Navigation Portfolio with over 75 installations globally. In 2021, we launched the next generation of zero and low-profile plating options, including two-, three- and four-hole variations,the module, as well as 10 degree lordotic implants, and our Cambria NanoMetalene anterior interbody device. In addition, we offer a variety of screwnew instrumentation to enhance our offering of navigated instruments. Further enhancements and plating systems, such asnew features to the Spine Module are in development and are expected to launch in 2022.

10




We launched a limited release of the Percutaneous Module for navigation of minimally invasive spinal procedures in 2021. This application, accompanied by new instrumentation, addresses an important part of the spine navigation market to round out the FLASHTM Navigation Platform and is a valuable enhancement for both hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers. We plan to fully launch the Percutaneous Module in 2022 and continue to innovate this technology application and instrumentation to expand the product line. In addition to these new products focused on spine, we continue to enhance our Cabo™ ACP Anterior Cervical PlatingCranial Module for the FLASHTM Navigation System that combinesfor use in cranial surgeries. The technology uses a large graft viewing windowscompletely contactless workflow, acquiring hundreds of thousands of virtual fiducials using the patient’s own anatomy, and a visual confirmation locking system for cervical fixation.

results in nearly instantaneous cranial registrations to the skin or skull in almost any surgical position.
Product Pipeline

We are committed to supplementing our portfolio of orthobiologics and spinal implant products through continuous innovation and bringing next-generation products to the market. Our development pipeline consists of a lateral access system, instrumentation and interbody implant featuring our NanoMetalene technology, modular MIS, revision and deformity systems based on our Mariner platform technology, a footprint expanding interbody device system, and additional applications for our NanoMetalene technology, as well as extensions of our orthobiologics product offerings to further differentiate this portfolio from those of our competitors.

We plan to continue to build and update our product and technology portfolio and expect to continue to launch a similar number of products and product line extensions in both the orthobiologics and spinal implant portfolios as we have in recent years. We believe that our future success and ability to continue to drive revenue growth depends on our ability to sustain this accelerateda similar cadence of launching new and next-generation products as we have demonstrated over the last few years. We continue to aggressively develop differentiated new products that we believe will allow us to enter new markets and be even more competitive in markets in which we are underrepresented. For example, during 2022, we expect to launch an improved version of our number one selling DBM product launchesfamily Accell Evo3/OsteoSurge 300. This new product line incorporates formulation and innovation.

process improvements that we believe will drive higher performance and at a lower manufacturing cost.
Research and Development

We have a research and development organization dedicated to advancing our portfolio of orthobiologics, and spinal implant products.and machine vision image guidance innovations through product development and clinical affairs programs. Our product development efforts employ an integrated team approach that involves collaboration between surgeons, our engineers, our machinists, as well as our regulatory personnel. Total research and development expense was $12.2 million, $11.4 million and $8.4 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Our spinal implants product development team, in consultation with designingdesign surgeons, formulates a design for the product and then our machinists build prototypes for testing in our prototyping development and testing operation at our Carlsbad, California facility. We use a broad scope of technologies designed to allow us to meet the complex engineering requirements of customers. As part of the

9




development process, spine surgeons test the implantation of the products in our in-house cadaveric laboratory,laboratories, which helps us design new products intended to meet the needs of both surgeon and patient. Our team refines or redesigns the prototype as necessary based on the results of the product testing, allowing us to perform rapid iterations of the design-prototype-test development cycle. Our clinical and regulatory personnel work in parallel with our product engineering personnel to facilitate regulatory clearances of our orthobiologics and spinal implant products. We believe that these product development efforts allow us to provide solutions that respond to the needs of our surgeon customers and their patients.


Similar to the spinal implants product development process, our software engineers, product managers and design surgeons are working towards the full integration of our spinal implants and orthobiologics product lines with our machine vision FLASHTM navigation system. This includes the design of specific software modules, features and tracked instruments designed to meet the needs of a wide range of procedures including, degenerative, complex, revision, and deformity spine procedures.

We plan to develop line extensions for our innovative orthobiologics technologies that will continue to reduceimprove bone forming potential while addressing specific procedural requirements both in the amount of autologous bone graft needed for spinal fusion procedures.spine field and in general orthopedic applications. We are investigating new product formulations in the traditional DBM and Ceramic Matrix product categories. Our orthobiologics research and development team has experience in biomaterial sciences and bringing next generation technologies to market.

We are also committed to developing new spinal implant products that leverage the NanoMetalene with Reef Topography, 3D-printed titanium and expandable interbody platforms technology and provide next generation solutions for our existing products or extend the range of solutions that we provide. We aim to further build upon our foundation of static and expandable interbodies through hyperlordotic and alternative approach options within the interbody space. We are also committed to providing products, such as additional hyperlordotic cagescage options and additional expandable technology solutions, to achieve appropriate curvature of the spine and that can improve sagittal balance, correcting the patient’s spinal alignment. We also plan to continue to develop next generation technologies that meet global demand, particularly with respect to cost and delivery methods in a manner which supports a scalable commercial model.


11



Sales and Distribution

We currently market and sell our products in the United States and in overapproximately 30 countries worldwide. Our United States sales organization consists of regional and territory business managers who oversee a broad network of independent orthobiologics and spinal implant sales agents that receive commissions from us based on sales that they generate. Our international sales organization consists of a sales management team that oversees a network of independent orthobiologics and spinal implant stocking distributors that purchase our products directly from us and independently sell them. During 2017,2021, our domestic and international revenues net accounted for 90% and 10%, respectively, of total revenue, net.revenue. Information regarding financial data by geographic segment is set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this report in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Note 12,10, “Segment and Geographic Information.”

In the United States, we typically consign our orthobiologics products and consign or loan our spinal implant sets to hospitals and independent sales agents, who in turn deliver them to the hospital for a single surgical procedure or leave them with hospitals that are high volume users for use in multiple procedures. Our spinal implant sets typically contain the instruments, including disposables, and spinal implants required to complete a surgery. We market our enabling technologies portfolio through a direct sales force in the United States that works together with our independent sales agents to generate either a capital sale or to place systems and components in an account in a capital efficient manner in return for a long-term revenue commitment for our spinal implant systems and/or orthobiologics products.


In international markets, we predominantly sell orthobiologics, complete instrument and implant sets and enabling technologies to independent stocking distributors. We recently notified our European distributors who consign or loan these sets to surgeons. We maintainthat we will discontinue all sales and marketing personnelactivities for our spinal implant portfolio in Switzerland, Italy,the European market effective September 2022 due to the significantly higher upfront and Francerecurring annual costs required to managecomply with European medical device regulations.We will continue to market and supportsell our stocking distributorsorthobiologics and enabling technologies products in Europethe European market.Additionally, we will continue to market our entire portfolio in the Latin American and use third-party distribution facilities in Belgium and the Netherlands to support international distribution efforts.Asia Pacific markets.


We have recently increased, and intend to continue to increase, the quality, size, exclusivity and geographic breadth of our sales management team and network of independent sales agents in the United States. During 2017,2020 and 2021, we gained representation in parts of the country where we had no representation or were significantly underrepresented. We anticipate adding additional independent sales agents in the United States in 2018. With certain of the new sales agents that we bring2022. We focus on boardentering distribution relationships in territories with a high potential for growth, we focus on entering into relationships in which theywhere our partner will carry our spinal implants and/or DBM products exclusively, except with respect to clinical markets that our products do not address.We believe these more exclusive relationships will allow us to grow faster and more cost effectively in these territories over the long term. As we continue to launch new products, weWe also plan to continue to invest in additional instrument sets and marketing and education efforts to support the expansion of our independent sales agent footprint.

To support our expansion efforts in the United States, we are investinghave invested more in, and are developingdeveloped comprehensive support for, sales agent and surgeon training and education programs. To this end, we have leveraged the capacity of our hands-on cadaveric training laboratorylaboratories at our Carlsbad, California facility and constructed a hands-on cadaveric training laboratory in our Wayne, Pennsylvania facilityfacilities to increase the number of training opportunities for surgeons and sales agents. We believe training and education will help surgeons become adept with our spinal implant products and techniques, thereby improving outcomes for their patients

patients.
We believe the expansion of our U.S. sales efforts will provide us with the opportunity for futureto sustain revenue growth as we continue to penetrate existing and new markets.

10





Internationally, we intend to continue to focus our sales and marketing efforts on expanding and strengthening our presence in those markets where we currently have relationships with stocking distributors and to selectively expand into new markets.

Suppliers and Raw Materials

In general, raw materials essential to our businesses are readily available from multiple sources. For reasons of quality assurance, availability or cost effectiveness, certain components and raw materials are available only from one supplier. Our relationships with suppliers that cannot be replaced without a material expense or delay are governed by written contracts, which are generally supply agreements. These agreements set forth the process by which we order components or raw materials, as applicable, from such suppliers (which process is either on a purchase order basis or based on quarterly or annual forecasts and in some cases require us to purchase minimum amounts) and the related fees for purchasing such components or raw materials. These agreements have terms from one to five years, but in most instances are terminable by us (and in limited instances the other party) for convenience, subject to a specified notice period, and are also terminable upon mutual agreement by the parties, by either party upon material breach by the other and by either party in the eventif the other party enters bankruptcy. These agreements also outline the rights of each party with respect to quality assurance, inspection and compliance with applicable law and contain what we believe to be customary indemnification provisions for commercial agreements. Each of these agreements is entered into in the ordinary course of our business, is immaterial in amount and significance and not a contract

12



upon which our business is substantially dependent. In addition, we endeavor to maintain sufficient inventory of components and raw materials so that our production will not be significantly disrupted even if a particular component or material is not available for a period of time.

Most of our biomaterialorthobiologics products contain material derived from human or bovine tissue. We only source our raw materials from tissue banks registered with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and accredited by the American Association of Tissue Banks (AATB). The donors are screened, tested and processed by the tissue banks in accordance with FDA and AATB requirements. Additionally, each donor must pass FDA-specified bacterial and viral testing before raw material is distributed to us for further processing. We receive with each donor lot a certification of the safety of the raw material from the tissue bank’s medical director. As an added safety assurance, of safety, each lot of bone is released into the manufacturing process only after our staff of quality assurance microbiologists screen the incoming bone and serology test records. During our manufacturing process, the bone particles are subjected to our proprietary process and terminally sterilized. This process is designed to support the safety and effectiveness of our DBM products.

The collagen used in our collagen ceramic matrix products is derived only from the deep flexor tendon of cattle less than 24 months old from the United States or New Zealand. The World Health Organization classifies different types of cattle tissue for relative risk of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), transmission. Deep flexor tendon is in the lowest-risk category for BSE transmission (the same category as milk, for example) and is therefore considered to have a negligible risk of containing the agent that causes BSE (an improperly folded protein known as a prion).

Intellectual Property

We seekcontinue to pursue patent and trademark protection for our key technology,technologies, methods, products and product improvements, both in the United States and in select foreign countries. When determinedcountries, and when appropriate we plan to continue to enforce and defend our patent and trademark rights. In general, however, we do not rely solely on our patent and trademark estate to provide us with any significant competitive advantages as it relates to our existing product lines.

We also rely upon trade secrets and continuing technological innovations to develop and maintain our competitive position. In an effort to protect our proprietary information, we typically require our employees, consultants and advisors to execute agreements that provide that confidential information developed or provided to the individual by us or on our behalf during the course of their relationship with us must be kept confidential, except in specified circumstances.

Our 7D Technology is protected by more than 60 issued and pending patents in the United States and other countries, including 22 issued patents in the United States. Representative utility and design patents and pending applications include (but are not limited to):
Systems and Methods for Intraoperative Guidance Feedback;
Method of Rendering and Manipulating Anatomical Images on Mobile Computing Device;
Handheld Support for Fiducial Markers;
Attachments for Tracking Handheld Implements;
Integrated Illumination and Optical Surface Topology Detection System and Methods of Use;
System and Method for Generating Partial Surface from Volumetric Data for Registration to Surface Topology Image Data;
Optical Alignment System;
Systems and Methods for Displaying Guidance Images with Spatial Annotations During a Guided Medical Procedure;
Tracking Marker Support Structure and Surface Registration Methods Employing the Same for Performing Navigated Surgical Procedures;
Systems, Methods and Devices for Tracking and Calibration of Flexible Instruments;
Method for Obtaining a Structured Light Reconstruction of a 3D Surface;
Systems and Methods for Intraoperative Spinal Level Verification;
Systems and Methods for Determining Intraoperative Spinal Orientation; and
Systems and Methods for Guided Manipulation of the Shape of a Surgical Implant.

13



IsoTis OrthoBiologics, Inc., one of our subsidiaries, owns a group of patents related to the reverse-phase carrier and Accell process and materials. This patent group protects the Accell family of DBM products. The patents in this group expire over a period of time from 2017 to 2023.through 2024.

We licensed three U.S. patents related to certain of our pedicle screw systems from Dr. Thomas T. Haider. The license agreement, as amended, expired when the last-to-expire licensed patent expired in December 2016. Sales of the products covered under this license agreement represented approximately 6% of our total revenue in 2017.


11




Our material registered and unregistered trademarks include: 7D Surgical®, Accell®, Evo3®Accell Connexus®, Accell Evo3®, Accell TBM®, Accell Total Bone Matrix®, AdmiralTM, Atoll™, Ballast®, Capistrano™, Coral®, Current®, Daytona®, DynaBlast®, DynaGraft®, DynaGraft-D®, Evo3®C, DynaGraft® II , Explorer®, FLASHTM, Flash RegistrationTM, Fusion Engineered™, Hollywood™, IsoTis®, IsoTis OrthoBiologics®, OrthoBlast® II Malibu™, Atoll™Manta RayTM, Capistrano™Mariner®, Coral®, Daytona®, Hollywood™, Malibu™Meridian®, NanoMetalene®, NewPort™, Vu aPOD™NorthStar®, Vu aPOD™ Prime,NorthStar OCTTM, OrthoBlast®, Ossatura®, OsteoBallast®, OsteoCurrent®, OsteoRushTM, OsteoSparxTM, OsteoStrand®, OsteoStrux®, OsteoSurge® 100 (or 300), OsteoTorrentTM, Outrigger®, RAPID®, RAPID: Rack and Pinion Integrated DeliveryTM, Reef®, Reef Topography®, Regatta®, RushTM, SeaSpine®, SeaSpine Outrigger®, Shoreline®, Shoreline RT®, Sierra™, Sonoma™, Shoreline® , Mariner®, TruProfile®, Ballast™, OsteoBallast™, Strand™, OsteoStrand™, SkipJack™SkipJack®, SkipJack Expandable Body™Interbody®, Sonoma™, SS AdmiralTM, Strand®, SynPlug®, TorrentTM, Trident-C™, Trident-L™, TruProfile®, Vu a•POD™, Vu a•POD PrimeTM, WaveForm®, and RAPID™WayFinder™.

Competition

The global orthobiologics, spinal implant and spineimage guided surgery markets are highly competitive. We face significant competition in both of these markets from the spine and orthopedic divisions of large multinational medical device companies, established companies focused solely or primarily on spine and orthopedics, as well as smaller, emerging players focused on product innovation. These competitors are focused on bringing new technologies to market and acquiring technologies and technology licenses that directly compete with our products or have potential product advantages that could render our products obsolete or noncompetitive.

Our primary competitors in the combined orthobiologics, spinal implants and spinal implantimage guided surgery markets include Medtronic,Alphatec Spine, Baxter, B. Braun, Brainlab, Bioventus, Cerapedics, DePuy Synthes Spine (a Johnson & Johnson company), NuVasive, Stryker, Globus Medical, K2M, Zimmer Biomet,Medtronic, NuVasive, Orthofix, RTI Surgical, Alphatec,Stryker, Surgalign, XTANT Medical, BaxterZimVie and severalmany smaller, biologically focusedbiologically-focused companies.

We anticipate that our currently marketed products and any future marketed products will be subject to intense competition. Many of our current competitors have significantly greater financial, manufacturing and marketing resources than we do, which could make the ability to scalescaling our business challenging. In addition, these competitors have more tenured relationships with parties in distribution channels and we anticipate they will continue to dedicate significant resources to marketing and distributing their products and to developing and commercializing competing products. Our ability to compete will depend on our ability to launch innovative new products that demonstrate superior clinical outcomes.

Regulation

We are a manufacturer and marketer of medical devices and a tissue bank, and therefore are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA, and the Center for Medicare Services of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and other federal governmental agencies and, in some jurisdictions, by state and foreign governmental agencies. The regulations to which we are subject govern the introduction of new medical devices, the observance of certain standards with respect to the design, manufacture, testing, labeling, promotion and sales of devices, record maintenance, the ability to track devices, potential and actual product defect reporting, import and export of devices, and other matters.

The regulatory process of obtaining product approvals and clearances can be onerous and costly. The FDA requires, as a condition to marketing a medical device in the United States, and as applicable based on product type and classification,
that we secure a Premarket Notification clearance pursuant to Section 510(k) of the United States Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FDCA) or an approved premarket approval (PMA) application (or PMA supplement). Obtaining these approvals and clearances can take up to several years and may involve preclinical studies and clinical trials. The FDA may also require a post-approval clinical trial as a condition of approval.

To perform clinical trials for significant risk devices in the United States on an unapproved product, we are required to obtain an Investigational Device Exemption from the FDA. The FDA may also require a filing for FDA approval prior to marketing products that are modifications of existing products or new indications for existing products. Moreover, after clearance/approval is given, if the product is shown to be hazardous or defective, the FDA and foreign regulatory agencies have the power to withdraw the clearance or require us to change the device, its manufacturing process or its labeling, to supply additional proof of its safety and effectiveness or to recall, repair, replace or refund the cost of the medical device.


14



The FDA Safety and Innovation Act of 2012 (FDASIA), which includes the Medical Device User Fee Amendments of 2012, as well as other medical device provisions, went into effect October 1, 2012. This includes performance goals and user fees paid to the FDA by medical device companies when they register and list with the FDA and when they submit an applicationapply to market a device in the United States. The FDASIA also imposes some additional requirements regarding FDA Establishment Registration and Listing of Medical Devices. All U.S. and foreign manufacturers must have aan FDA Establishment Registration and complete Medical Device listings for sales in the United States.

SeaSpine manufacturesWe manufacture medical devices derived from human tissue (demineralized bone tissue). The FDA has specific regulations governing human cells, tissues, and cellular and tissue-based products (HCT/Ps). An HCT/P is a product containing, or consisting of, human cells or tissue intended for transplantation into a human patient. Examples include bone, ligament, skin

12




and cornea. Some HCT/Ps fall within the definition of a biological product, medical device or drug regulated under the FDCA. These biologic, device or drug HCT/Ps must comply both with the requirements exclusively applicable to HCT/Ps and, in addition, with requirements applicable to biologics, devices or drugs, including premarket clearance or approval from the FDA.

Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act authorizes the FDA to issue regulations to prevent the introduction, transmission or spread of communicable disease. HCT/Ps regulated as 361 HCT/Ps are subject to requirements relating to registering facilities and listing products with the FDA, screening and testing for tissue donor eligibility, Good Tissue Practice when processing, storing, labeling, and distributing HCT/Ps, including required labeling information, stringent record keeping, and adverse event reporting.

The AATB has issued operating standards for tissue banking. Accreditation is voluntary, but compliance with these standards is a requirement in order to become an AATB-accredited tissue establishment. In addition, some states have their own tissue banking regulations. We are licensed or have permits for tissue banking in California, Florida, New York, Maryland, and other states that require specific licensing or registration.

National Organ Transplant Act. Procurement of certain human organs and tissue for transplantation is subject to the restrictions of the National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA), which prohibits the transfer of certain human organs, including skin and related tissue for valuable consideration, but permits the reasonable payment associated with the removal, transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control and storage of human tissue and skin. We reimburse tissue banks for their expenses associated with the recovery, storage and transportation of donated human tissue that they provide to us for processing. We include in our pricing structure amounts paid to tissue banks to reimburse them for their expenses associated with the recovery and transportation of the tissue, in addition to certain costs associated with processing, preservation, quality control and storage of the tissue, marketing and medical education expenses, and costs associated with development of tissue processing technologies. NOTA payment allowances may be interpreted to limit the amount of costs and expenses that we may recover in our pricing for our products, thereby reducing our future revenue and profitability.

Postmarket Requirements. After a device is cleared or approved for commercial distribution, numerous regulatory requirements apply. These include, but are not limited to, the FDA’s Quality System Regulations which cover the procedures and documentation of the design, testing, production processes, controls, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, storage and shipping of medical devices; the FDA’s general prohibition against promoting products for off-label uses; the Federal Medical Device Reporting regulation, which requires that manufacturers provide information to the FDA whenever there is evidence that reasonably suggests that a device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or that a malfunction occurred which would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury upon recurrence; and the Reports of Corrections and Removals regulation, which requires manufacturers to report recalls and field corrective actions to the FDA if initiated to reduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the FDCA.

We are also required to register with the FDA as a medical device manufacturer. As such, our manufacturing sites are subject to periodic inspection by the FDA for compliance with the FDA’s Quality System Regulations. These regulations require that we manufacture our products and maintain our documents in a prescribed manner with respect to design, manufacturing, testing and control activities. Further, we are required to comply with various FDA requirements and other legal requirements for labeling and promotion. If the FDA believes that a company is not in compliance with applicable regulations, it may issue a warning letter, institute proceedings to detain or seize products, issue a recall order, impose operating restrictions, enjoin future violations and assess civil penalties against that company, its officers or its employees and may recommend criminal prosecution to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). Similar requirements to those outlined above also apply to tissue products.


15



Medical device regulations also are in effect in many of the countries in which we do business outside the United States. These laws range from comprehensive medical device approval and quality system requirements for some or all of our medical device products to simpler requests for product data or certifications. The number and scope of these requirements are increasing. Under the EUprevious European Medical Devices Directive and its replacement the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) EU 2017/745, medical devices mustwere required to meet the Medical Devices Directive requirements and receive CE Mark Certification prior to marketing in the EU.EU and European Economic Area. CE Mark Certification requires a comprehensive quality system program, comprehensive technical documentation and data on the product, which are then reviewed by a Notified Body.Body for most products. A Notified Body is an organization designated by the national governments of the EU member states to make independent judgments about whether a product complies with the requirements established by each CE marking directive. The Medical Devices Directive andregulation. ISO 13485 areis a recognized international quality standards that arestandard designed to ensure that we develop and manufacture quality medical devices. Other countries are also institutinghave instituted regulations regarding medical devices. Compliance with these regulations requires extensive documentation, andoften including clinical reports for all of our products, revisions to labeling, and other requirements such as facility inspections to comply with the registration requirements. A recognized Notified Body or government agency audits our facilities annually to verify our compliance with these standards.

13





In the EU, our products that contain human-derived tissue, including demineralized bone material, are not medical devices as defined in the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) EU 2017/745 replacing prior directives Medical Devices Directive (93/42/EC) and 2001/83/EC respectively.MDR. They are also not medicinal products as defined in Directive 2001/83/EC. Today, tissue regulations, if applicable, are different from one EU member state to the next. Because of the absence of a harmonized regulatory framework and the proposed regulation for advanced therapy medicinal products in the EU, the approval process for human-derived cell or tissue-based medical products may be extensive, lengthy, expensive, and unpredictable.

Certain countries, as well as the EU, have issued regulations that govern products that contain materials derived from animal sources. Regulatory authorities are particularly concerned with materials infected with the agent that causes BSE. These regulations affect our biomaterial products for the spine, which contain material derived from bovine tissue. Although we take great caresteps designed to provide that our products are safe and free of agents that can cause disease, products that contain materials derived from animals, including our products, may become subject to additional regulation, or even be banned in certain countries, because of concern over the potential for prion transmission. Significant new regulations, a ban of our products, or a movement away from bovine-derived products because of an outbreak of BSE could have a material and adverse effect on our current business or our ability to expand our business. See “Risk“Risk Factors-Risks RelatingRelated to Our Regulatory Environment-CertainNon-Compliance with Laws and Regulations - Certain of our products contain materials derived from animal sources and may become subject to additional regulation.”

We are subject to laws and regulations pertaining to healthcare fraud and abuse, including anti-kickback laws and physician self-referral laws that regulate how companies in the health care industry may market their products to hospitals and health care professionals and may compete by discounting the prices of their products. The delivery of our products is subject to regulation regarding reimbursement, and federal healthcare laws apply when a customer submits a claim for a product that is reimbursed under a federally funded healthcare program. These rules require that we exercise care in structuring our sales and marketing practices and customer discount arrangements. See “Risk Factors-Risks RelatingRelated to Our Regulatory Environment-OversightNon-Compliance with Laws and Regulations - Oversight of the medical device industry might affect the way may sell medical devices and compete in the marketplace.”

Our international operations subject us to laws regarding sanctioned countries, entities and persons, customs, import-export, laws regarding transactions in foreign countries, the FCPA and local anti-bribery and other laws regarding interactions with healthcare professionals. Among other things, these laws restrict, and in some cases prohibit, United States companies from directly or indirectly selling goods, technology or services to people or entities in certain countries. In addition, these laws require that we exercise care in structuring our sales and marketing practices in foreign countries.

Our research, development and manufacturing processes involve the controlled use of certain hazardous materials. We are subject to country-specific, federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of these materials and certain waste products. We believe that our environmental, health and safety (EHS) procedures for handling and disposing of these materials comply with the standards prescribed by the controlling laws and regulations. However, risk of accidental releases or injury from these materials is possible. These risks are managed to minimize or eliminate associated business impacts. In the event of this type of accident, we could be held liable for damages that may result, and any liability could exceed our resources. We could be subject to a regulatory shutdown of a facility that could prevent the distribution and sale of products manufactured there for a significant period of time and we could suffer a casualty loss that could require a shutdown of the facility in order to repair it, any of which could have a material and adverse effect on our business. Although we continuously strive to maintain full compliance with respect to all applicable global EHS

16



laws and regulations, we could incur substantial costs to fully comply with future laws and regulations, and our operations, business or assets may be impacted.

In addition to the above regulations, we are and may be subject to regulation under country-specific federal and state laws, including, but not limited to, requirements regarding record keeping, and the maintenance of personal information, including personal health information. As a public company, we are subject to the securities laws and regulations, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We also are subject to other present, and could be subject to possible future, local, state, federal and foreign regulations.

Reimbursement Overview

Healthcare providers that purchase medical devices generally rely on third-party payors, including the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and private payors, such as indemnity insurers, employer group health insurance programs and managed care plans, to reimburse all or part of the cost of the device. As a result, demand for our products is and will continue to be dependentdepend in part on the coverage and reimbursement policies of these third-party and private payors. The manner in which reimbursement is sought and obtained varies based upon the type of payor involved and the setting in which the device is furnished and utilized. Reimbursement from Medicare, Medicaid and other third-party payors may be subject to periodic adjustments as a result of

14




legislative, regulatory and policy changes and budgetary pressures. Possible reductions in, or eliminations of, coverage or reimbursement by third-party and private payors, or denial of, or provision of uneconomical reimbursement for new products, as a result of these changes may affect our customers’ revenue and ability to purchase our products. Any changes in the healthcare regulatory, payment or enforcement landscape relative to our customers’ healthcare services may significantly affect our operations and revenue.

Facilities
We operatemaintain four operating facilities: our headquarters in Carlsbad, California, from which our orthobiologics and spinal implant products are designed, developed, and marketed and from which our more recently launched spinal implant products are inspected, kitted and distributed; a manufacturing and distribution facility in Irvine, California, from which most of our orthobiologics products are manufactured and all are distributed; office space in Wayne, Pennsylvania, where we design spinal implants and which facilitates our interactions with customers on the East Coast; and our European salesoffice space in Toronto, Canada, from which enabling technologies products are designed, developed, and marketing office in Lyon, France.

marketed.
We inspect, kit, and distribute most of our spinal implant products through a third-party logistics provider facility in Olive Branch, Mississippi. We distribute our orthobiologics and spinal implant products in certain international markets through third-party logistics provider facilities in Belgium and the Netherlands.

Additional information regarding our facilities may be found in Part I, Item 2 of this report.

Employees

As of February 26, 2018,March 7, 2022, we had 327523 employees, 40106 of whom were engaged in research and development, 89147 in manufacturing, 105156 in sales and marketing and 93114 in general and administrative activities.

Available Information

We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act). In accordance with the Exchange Act, we file or furnish annual, quarterly and current reports, amendments to those reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. We make these reports and other information available free of charge on our website at www.seaspine.com under the investors page as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. All such reports were made available in this fashion during 2017.

2021.
The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov. The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330.



17



ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

YouBefore you invest in our securities, you should be aware that our business faces numerous risks, including those described below, as well as general economic and business risks. The following discussion provides information concerning the material risks and uncertainties that we have identified and believe may adversely affect our business, our financial condition and our results of operations. Before you decide whether to invest in our securities, you should carefully consider thethese risks described below,and uncertainties, together with all of the other information included in this Form 10-K,report and in evaluating the Company and our common stock.other public filings, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. If any of the risks described below actually occurs, our business, financial results, financial condition and stock price could be materially and adversely affected.
Risks RelatingSummary of Risk Factors
The section provides a summary of many of the risks we are exposed to in the normal course of our Businessbusiness activities. The summary does not contain all of the information that may be important to you, and you should read the summary together with the more detailed discussion of risks set forth following this section as well as elsewhere in this report.

Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We expect to incur losses for the foreseeable future and cannot assure you that we will be able to generate sufficient sales tomay not achieve or sustain profitability.
We expectoperate in a highly competitive industry and we may not compete successfully.
We must successfully educate and train surgeons and their staff on the proper use of our products.
Changes in third-party payment systems and in the healthcare industry may adversely impact our business.
Industry trends have resulted in increased downward pricing pressure on medical services and products, which may affect our ability to incur losses for the foreseeable future as we dedicate significant resourcessell our products at prices necessary to support our marketing and product development strategy, including as we continue to: (i)current business strategy.
We may not develop new products in a timely and next generation productsconsistent manner.
We may not maintain or grow our revenue if we are unable to maintain and product line extensions (allexpand our network of which we refer to as “new products”); (ii) develop new medical techniques designed to enhance the utility of our products; (iii) collect clinical data and conduct clinical studies to differentiate our products from those of our competitors and to demonstrate the value of our products to current and prospective customers and payors; (iv) add independent sales agents and stocking distributorsdistributors.
The failure to increasedemonstrate the safety and efficacy of our geographicproducts in clinical studies will adversely affect our sales.
Our business could be harmed if any of our manufacturing, development or research facilities are damaged and/or our manufacturing processes are interrupted.
We depend on a limited number of third-party suppliers for processing activities, components and raw materials.
Security breaches, loss of data and other disruptions could compromise sensitive information related to our business.
Our success depends on the services of key members of our senior management and other key employees.
We may have significant product liability exposure and our insurance may not cover all potential claims.
We are exposed to significant uninsured liabilities.
We are exposed to a variety of risks relating to our international sales coverage and penetration; (v) increase productoperations.
We may be subject to continuing contingent liabilities of Integra.
Our sales volumes and our operating results may fluctuate.
We must maintain high levels of inventory, which could consume a significant amount of our resources and reduce our cash flows.
Our future financial results could be adversely affected by impairments or other charges.
Our future capital needs are uncertain and we may need to raise additional funds in the likelihoodfuture, and such funds may not be available on acceptable terms or at all.
We are subject to stringent medical device regulation and any adverse regulatory action may materially and adversely affect our financial condition and business operations.
There is no guarantee that the FDA will grant 510(k) clearance or premarket approval, or that equivalent foreign regulatory authorities will grant the foreign equivalent, of successour future products.

18



Certain of newour products are derived from human tissue or contain materials derived from animal sources and are or could be subject to additional regulations.
Clinical studies are expensive and their results may not support our product launches;candidate claims.
If the third parties on which we rely to conduct our clinical studies do not perform as contractually required or expected, we may not commercialize our products.
Oversight of the medical device industry might affect the way we sell medical devices and (vi) expandcompete in the marketplace.
Unfavorable negative publicity concerning both alleged improper methods of tissue recovery from donors and disease transmission from donated tissue could limit widespread acceptance of some of our marketing campaignsproducts.
We are subject to a wide range of requirements, regulations and surgeon educationlaws due to our international operations.
Regulations related to “conflict minerals” may force us to incur additional expenses, may make our supply chain more complex and training programs. may result in damage to our reputation with customers.
We cannot assure youare subject to requirements relating to hazardous materials which may impose significant compliance costs on us.
Our intellectual property rights may not provide meaningful commercial protection for our products.
Intellectual property in our industry has been the source of litigation and other disputes, which is inherently costly and unpredictable.
We may be subject to claims by third parties asserting that we will ever generate sufficient revenues fromhave misappropriated their intellectual property.
Our stock price has been and may continue to be volatile.
Your ownership percentage may be diluted, including by our operations to achieve profitability and, even if we achieve profitability, we

15




cannot assure youissuance of preferred stock with terms that we will remain profitable over time. Our failure to achievecould dilute the voting power or maintain profitability could negatively affectreduce the value of our securitiescommon stock.
We do not anticipate paying cash dividends.
Risks Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic
Our business, financial condition and results of operations will continue to be materially and adversely impacted in the near-term, and could be materially and adversely impacted in the long-term, by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic materially and adversely impacted our business and we expect the impact to continue through at least the duration of the pandemic as regions respond to local conditions. To date, the impacts include: the cancellation or postponement of procedures in which our products otherwise could be used; personnel and other resource shortages at hospitals and other centers at which spine surgery procedures in which our products otherwise could be used; disruptions or restrictions on the ability of many of our employees and of third parties on which we rely to work effectively, including because of adherence to governmental orders or recommendations or to internal policies intended to reduce the spread of COVID-19; and temporary closures of our facilities and of the facilities of our customers and suppliers. For example, throughout the third quarter of 2021, and most acutely starting in August, spine surgery procedure volumes were negatively impacted in many areas of the United States, including in Florida and Texas, where we derive a meaningful portion of our revenue, due to cancellations and/or postponements of procedures as a result of the increased cases and transmissibility of COVID-19 and because hospitals and other surgical centers were experiencing staffing shortages. As jurisdictions throughout the world continue to deal with and respond to the pandemic, the degree of the impact of the pandemic may increase in scope or magnitude or we may experience additional material adverse impacts in one or more regions. Any other variant of the virus that causes COVID-19 that causes more infections, spreads faster or causes more severe illness than current or previous variants, other outbreaks of contagious diseases or other adverse public health developments in countries where we operate or where our customers or suppliers are located could also have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Because of the pandemic, surgeons and their patients were required, and in certain regions continue to be required, or are choosing, particularly in areas with a high or increasing number of cases of COVID-19, to cancel or postpone procedures in which our products otherwise could be used, and many facilities that specialize in the procedures in which our products otherwise could be used temporarily closed or continue to be temporarily closed or operating at reduced hours or are experiencing personnel and other resource constraints and shortages. In addition, even after the pandemic subsides and/or governmental orders no longer prohibit or recommend against performing such procedures, patients may continue to defer such procedures out of concern of being exposed to COVID-19 or for other reasons. Deferrals of elective surgeries could result in delayed product launches if it takes longer than anticipated to collect feedback following an alpha launch. Further, facilities at

19



which our products typically are used may not reopen or, even if they reopen, patients may elect to have procedures performed at facilities that are, or are perceived to be, lower-risk, such as ambulatory surgery centers, and our products may not be approved at such facilities, and we may be unable to have our products approved for use at such facilities on a timely basis, or at all.

The effect of the pandemic on the broader economy could also negatively affect demand for procedures using our products, both in the near- and long-term. For example, as a result of the impact of the pandemic, individuals have lost, and others may lose, access to their private health insurance plan if they have lost or lose their job. Any prolonged economic downturn or recession as a result of the pandemic could result in layoffs of employees and a significant increase in unemployment in the United States and elsewhere, which may continue even after the pandemic is contained. An impact to job status may extend for a prolonged period of time, beyond possible coverage periods through COBRA, or where the cost to maintain coverage may not be affordable to an individual. As most of the patients who use our products rely on third-party payors, including government programs and private health insurance plans, to cover the cost of our products, patients may lose coverage to our products, which may harm our business and results of operations.

Workforce shortages and limitations and travel restrictions resulting from the impacts of COVID-19, including actions taken to contain the spread of COVID-19, have and will continue to adversely affect almost every aspect of our business. As noted above, spine surgery procedure volumes have recently been negatively impacted in many areas of the United States, including in states where we derive a meaningful portion of our revenue, because of hospitals and other surgical centers experiencing staffing shortages. If a significant percentage of the workforce of third parties on which we rely cannot work or cannot dedicate their time and resources to our business matters, including because of personnel and other resource constraints and shortages, illness, or travel, government or internal policies or restrictions, our operations and financial results may continue to be negatively impacted or the impact thereon may increase in scope or magnitude. Similarly, if a significant percentage of our workforce cannot work effectively due to the effects of the pandemic, our operations may be negatively affected. Because of government recommendations or orders, policies of third parties on which we rely, and social distancing recommendations or guidelines in many countries around the world, there is an increased reliance on working from home for the workforce of third parties on which we rely. It may also cause us not to timely submit required filings, including with the SEC,FDA, or other regulatory bodies, both in the U.S. and outside the U.S., any of which by itself may have a negative effect on our business, such as by making us ineligible to conduct an offering under a Form S-3 registration statement, which generally takes less time and is less expensive than other means, such as conducting an offering under a Form S-1 registration statement. In addition, changes impacting workforce function at the FDA and other regulatory bodies, as well as changes impacting workforce function at the facilities at which we seek to have new products approved for use, could adversely impact the timing of when our new products are cleared for marketing and approved for use, either of which could adversely impact the timing of our ability to attractsell these new products and retain personnel, raisecould have a material and adverse effect on our revenue growth. Conversely, we may face several challenges or disruptions upon a return to the workplace if and when the pandemic subsides, including re-integration challenges by our employees and distractions to management related to such transition.

Further, disruptions in the manufacture and/or distribution of our products or in our supply chain may occur as a result of the pandemic, including for the reasons above, or other events that result in staffing shortages, production slowdowns, stoppages, or disruptions in delivery systems, any of which could materially and adversely affect our ability to manufacture and/or distribute our products, or to obtain the raw materials and supplies necessary to manufacture and/or distribute our products, in a timely manner, or at all.

We may also experience other unknown adverse impacts from the pandemic that cannot be predicted. For example, hospitals and other facilities at which we sell our products may renegotiate their purchase prices, including as a result of, or the perception they may be suffering, financial difficulty as a result of the pandemic. Similarly, facilities at which we seek to sell our products in the future may require price reductions relative to the price at which we previously expected to sell our products. Reduction in the prices at which we sell products to existing customers may have a material and adverse effect on our future financial results and reductions in the prices at which we expected to sell products to anticipated customers may have a material and adverse effect on our expectations for revenue growth.

Further, the global capital executemarkets experienced, and we expect will continue to experience, disruption and volatility due to the pandemic, adversely impacting access to capital not only for us, but also for our customers and suppliers who need access to capital. Their inability to access capital in a timely manner, or at all, could adversely impact demand for our products and/or adversely impact our ability to manufacture and/or supply our products, any of which could have a material and adverse effect on our business.


20



The full extent to which the pandemic will, directly or indirectly, impact our business, strategyresults of operations and financial condition, including our sales, expenses, supply chain integrity, manufacturing capability, research and development activities, and employee-related compensation, is highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with reasonable accuracy at this time and will depend on future developments that are also highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with reasonable accuracy at this time, including, without limitation: (a) new information that may emerge concerning COVID-19, its contagiousness and/or virulence; (b) new variants of the virus that causes COVID-19 that cause more infections, spread faster or cause more severe illness than current or previous variants; (c) resurgences in COVID-19 transmission and infection following the easing or lifting of “stay-at-home” or other restrictions or following resumption of surgical procedures, whether as a result thereof, as a result of reinfection, as a result of a delay in the emergence of symptoms following infection (or reinfection) by COVID-19, or as a result of its ability to lay dormant following infection (or reinfection), and the adverse impact the foregoing may have on our business and financial condition, including because of the adverse impact on patients’ willingness to undergo procedures in which our products could be used; (d) actions required or recommended to contain or treat COVID-19, in light of any or all of the foregoing or other as-yet unanticipated developments, whether related to COVID-19 directly or indirectly; and (e) the direct and indirect economic impact, both domestically and abroad, of COVID-19 as a result of any or all of the foregoing, including actions taken by local, state, national and international governmental agencies, whether such impact affects customers, suppliers, or markets generally.

The pandemic also heightens the risks in certain of the other risk factors we face described in this report.
Risks Related to Product Development
We may not develop new products in a timely and consistent manner, and failure to do so may adversely affect the attractiveness of our overall product portfolio to our surgeon customers and negatively impact our sales and market share.
To be and remain competitive, we need to sunset legacy systems while introducing new products and enhancements or modifications to our existing products on a regular basis and successfully respond to technological advances. Doing so is technologically challenging and involves significant risks and uncertainty. Despite substantial investments of time and resources, our research and development efforts may not result in technically feasible new products. Even if technically feasible, the anticipated time and cost of obtaining regulatory clearance and/or approval and/or commercializing a new product may be too great to justify continued development. In addition, competitors could develop products that are more effective, are less expensive to manufacture, are priced more competitively or are ready for commercial introduction before our products. The introduction of new products by our competitors may lead us to reduce the prices of our products, may lead to reduced margins or loss of market share, and may render our products obsolete or noncompetitive. The success of any of our new product offerings or enhancement or modification to our existing products will depend on several factors, including our ability to:
properly identify and anticipate surgeon and patient needs;
develop new products or enhancements or modifications in a timely manner;
obtain regulatory clearance and/or approvals for new products or product enhancements or modifications in a timely manner;
achieve timely alpha and/or full commercial launches of new products;
provide adequate training to potential users of new products and product enhancements or modifications;
receive adequate reimbursement approval of third-party payors such as Medicaid, Medicare and private insurers; and
develop an effective marketing and distribution network.
If we cannot develop technically and commercially viable new products and enhancements or modifications to our existing products on a consistent basis and before our competitors, our prospects could be materially and adversely affected. Our ability to develop and launch new products and enhancements in a timely and consistent manner may be adversely impacted due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in light of the reduced access to our hands-on cadaveric training facilities in Carlsbad, California and Wayne, Pennsylvania, or if we are required to or elect to temporarily close them, the change in the manner in which our workforce is functioning and the changes impacting workforce function at the FDA and other regulatory bodies, as well as changes impacting workforce function at the facilities at which we seek to have new products approved for use.
It is also important that we carefully manage our introduction of new products and enhancements or modifications to our existing products. If potential customers delay purchases until new or enhanced or modified products are available, it could

21



negatively impact our sales. In addition, to the extent we have excess or obsolete inventory as we transition to new or enhanced or modified products, it would result in margin reducing write-offs for obsolete inventory, and our results of operations may suffer.
There is no guarantee that the FDA will grant 510(k) clearance or premarket approval, or that equivalent foreign regulatory authorities will grant the foreign equivalent, of our future products, and failure to obtain necessary clearances or approvals for our future products would adversely affect our ability to grow our business.
In general, unless an exemption applies, a medical device and modifications to the device or its indications must receive either premarket approval or premarket clearance from the FDA before it can be marketed in the U.S. While in the past we have received such clearances, we may not succeed in the future in receiving approvals and clearances in a timely manner, or at all. The process of obtaining approval or clearance from the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory agencies for new products, or for enhancements or modifications to existing products, could:
take significant time;
require the expenditure of substantial resources;
involve rigorous and expensive pre-clinical and clinical testing, as well as post-market surveillance;
involve modifications, repairs or replacements of our products; and
result in limitations on the indicated uses of our products.
Some of our new products will require FDA 510(k) clearance or approval of a premarket approval application, or PMA, prior to being marketed. Any modification to a 510(k)-cleared device that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, including significant design and manufacturing changes, or that would constitute a major change in its intended use, design or manufacture, requires a new 510(k) clearance or, possibly, approval of a PMA. Similarly, modifications to PMA-approved products may require submission and approval of a PMA supplement. The FDA requires every manufacturer to determine whether a new 510(k) or PMA is needed in the first instance, and the FDA has issued guidance on assessing modifications to 510(k)-cleared and PMA-approved devices to assist manufacturers with making these determinations. However, the FDA may review any such determination and the FDA may not agree with our determinations regarding whether new clearances or approvals are necessary. We have modified some of our 510(k)-cleared products and have determined, based on our understanding of FDA guidance, that certain changes did not require new 510(k) clearances. If the FDA disagrees with our determination and requires us to seek new 510(k) clearances, or PMA approval, for modifications to our cleared products, we may have to stop marketing or distributing our products, we may need to recall the modified product until we obtain clearance or approval, and we may be subject to significant regulatory fines or penalties. Significant delays in receiving clearance or approval, or failing to receive clearance or approval for our new products would have a material and adverse effect on our ability to expand our business.
Outside the U.S., clearance or approval procedures can vary among countries and can involve additional product testing and validation and additional administrative review periods. The time required to obtain clearance or approval in other countries might differ from that required to obtain FDA clearance or approval. The regulatory process in other countries may include all of the risks to which we are exposed in the U.S., as well as other risks. Favorable regulatory action in one country does not ensure favorable regulatory action in another, but a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory clearance or approval in one country may have a negative effect on the regulatory process in others. Failure to obtain clearance or approval in other countries or any delay or setback in obtaining such clearance or approval have a material and adverse effect on our business, including that our products may not be cleared or approved for all indications requested, which could limit the uses of our products and have an adverse effect on product sales.
In the EEA, we must inform the Notified Body that carried out the conformity assessment of the medical devices we market or sell in the EEA of any planned substantial change to our quality system or any significant change to our devices. The Notified Body will then assess the change and verify whether it affects the products’ conformity with the Essential Requirements or the conditions for the use of the device. If the assessment is favorable, the Notified Body may issue a new CE Certificate of Conformity or an addendum to the existing CE Certificate of Conformity. If it is not, we may not be able to continue to market and sell the applicable product in the EEA, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We cannot be certain that we will receive required approval or clearance from the FDA and foreign regulatory agencies for new products, including modifications to existing products, on a timely basis, or at all. Failing to receive approval or

22



clearance for new products on a timely basis would have a material and adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Clinical studies are expensive and subject to extensive regulation and their results may not support our product candidate claims or may result in the discovery of adverse effects.
In developing new products or new indications for, or modifications to, existing products, we may conduct or sponsor pre-clinical testing, clinical studies or other clinical research. We are conducting post-market clinical studies of some of our products to gather information about their performance or optimal use. The data collected from these clinical studies may ultimately be used to support additional market clearance or approval for these products or future products. If any of our new products require premarket clinical studies, these studies are expensive, the outcomes are inherently uncertain and they are subject to extensive regulation and review by numerous governmental authorities both in the U.S. and abroad, including by the FDA and, if federal funds are involved or if an investigator or site has signed a federal assurance, are subject to further regulation by the Office for Human Research Protections and the National Institutes of Health. For example, clinical studies must be conducted in compliance with FDA regulations, local regulations, and according to principles and standards collectively called “Good Clinical Practices.” Failure to comply with applicable regulations could result in regulatory and legal enforcement action, including fines, penalties, suspension of studies, and also could invalidate the data and make it unusable to support an FDA submission.
Even if any of our future premarket clinical studies are completed as planned, we cannot be certain that their results will support our product candidates and/or proposed claims or that the FDA or foreign authorities and Notified Bodies will agree with our interpretation and conclusions regarding the data they generate. Success in pre-clinical studies and early clinical studies does not ensure that later clinical studies will succeed, and we cannot be sure that the results of later studies will replicate those of earlier or prior studies. The clinical study process may fail to demonstrate that our product candidates are safe and effective for the proposed indicated uses, which could cause us to abandon a product candidate and may delay development of others. Any delay or termination of our clinical studies will delay the filing of our product submissions and, ultimately, our ability to commercialize our product candidates and generate revenues. It is also possible that patient subjects enrolled in our clinical studies of our marketed products will experience adverse side effects that are not currently part of the product candidate’s profile and, if so, these findings may result in lower market acceptance, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Further, the COVID-19 pandemic and associated shelter-in-place orders could limit or restrict our ability or the ability of others on which we rely to initiate, conduct or continue operations.our clinical studies of some of our products. Delays and disruption in such studies could result in delays for expanded FDA and other regulatory clearance or approval of our products.
If the third parties on which we rely to conduct our clinical studies and to assist us with pre-clinical development do not perform as contractually required or expected, we may not obtain regulatory clearance, approval or a CE Certificate of Conformity for or commercialize our products.
We often must rely on third parties, such as contract research organizations, medical institutions, clinical investigators and contract laboratories, to assist in conducting our clinical studies and other development activities. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, comply with applicable regulatory obligations or meet expected deadlines, or if these third parties need to be replaced, or if the quality or accuracy of the data they obtain is compromised due to failing to adhere to clinical protocols, to applicable regulatory requirements or otherwise, our pre-clinical development activities and clinical studies may be extended, delayed, suspended or terminated. Under these circumstances, we may not be able to obtain regulatory clearance/approval or a CE Certificate of Conformity for, or successfully commercialize, our products on a timely basis, if at all, and our business, operating results and prospects may be materially and adversely affected.
Risks Related to Manufacturing, Commercial Operations and Commercialization
We operate in an industry and in market segments that are highly competitive and we may be unable tonot compete successfullysuccessfully.
There is intense competition among medical device companies that serve the spinal surgery market. We compete with established medical technology companies, as well as earlier-stage companies that often have differentiated technology and potentially superior solutions for the challenges facing our neurosurgeon and orthopedic spine surgeon customers and their patients. Our primary competitors include Medtronic,Alphatec Spine, Baxter, Bioventus, Cerapedics, DePuy Synthes Spine (a Johnson &

23



Johnson company), NuVasive, Stryker, Globus Medical, K2M, Zimmer, Biomet,Medtronic, NuVasive, Orthofix, RTI Surgical, Alphatec,Stryker, Surgalign, XTANT Medical, BaxterZimVie and severalmany smaller, biologically-focused companies.

Many of our competitors may have access to greater financial, technical, research and development, marketing, manufacturing, sales, distribution, administrative, consulting and other resources than we do. Our competitors may be more effective at developing products, at differentiating their products from our and other competitor products and at designing, executing, analyzing the results of and publishing data from clinical studies. Our competitors may also have: stronger intellectual property portfolios; broader spine surgery product offerings and products supported by more extensive clinical data; more established distribution networks; entrenched relationships with surgeons; significantly greater name recognition as well asand more recognizable trademarks for products similar to the products that we sell; more established relationships with healthcare providers and payors; greater experience in obtaining and maintaining FDA and other regulatory clearances or approvals for products and product enhancement; and greater experience in launching, marketing and selling products than we do. Many of our competitors specialize in a specific product or focus on a particular market segment, making it more difficult for us to increase our overall market position. The frequent introduction by competitors of products that are, or claim to be, superior to our products, or that are alternatives to our existing or planned products may also create market confusion that may make it difficult to differentiate the benefits of our products over competing products. In addition, the entry of multiple new products and competitors may lead some of our competitors to employ pricing strategies that could adversely affect the pricing of our products and pricing in the spine market generally.
Our competitive position depends on our ability to achieve market acceptance for our current and future products. Market acceptance for any of our products requires, among other things, that we timely secure regulatory clearance and/or approval; demonstrate the value of our products, both to our surgeon customers and payors, which may require that we collect clinical data and/or conduct clinical studies; effectively educate and train our surgeon customers and their staff on the proper use of our products; obtain and maintain coverage and adequate reimbursement for our products, both within and outside the U.S., including under Medicare and Medicaid and from private payors; attract and retain a network of independent sales agents and stocking distributors focused on neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons; develop and execute an effective marketing strategy; protect the proprietary positions of our products, including through patent protection; and consistently produce quality products in sufficient quantities to meet demand. ThereSignificant risks are significant risks associated with each of these activities and other activities required to achieve market acceptance of both our current and future products, someincluding risks inherent in collaborations, such as with restor3d, Inc., or use of whichnascent manufacturing or imaging techniques, such as additive processing (more commonly known as 3D printing) or advanced optical technologies and machine version-based registration algorithms. Some of these risks are more fully described elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” section.
In addition, at any time our current competitors or other companies may develop alternative treatments, products or procedures for the treatment of spine disorders that compete directly or indirectly with our products, including ones that prove to be superior to our products.
For these reasons, we may not be able to compete successfully against our existing or potential competitors. Any such failure could lead us to modify our strategy, to lower our prices, or to increase the commissions we pay on sales of our products and could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we are unable tocannot compete effectively, our sales and operating results may suffer.
To be commercially successful, we must effectively demonstrate to neurosurgeon and orthopedic spine surgeons the merits of our products compared to those of our competitors.
Neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons play a significant role in determining the course of treatment and, ultimately, the product used to treat a patient. As a result, our success depends, in large part, on demonstrating to these surgeons the value of our products in the treatment of their patients. To do so requires that we continue to invest in medical education and training and, along with our independent sales agents and stocking distributors, demonstrate the merits of our products and underlying technology compared to those of our competitors. The primary manner in which we offer to educate and train surgeons and their staff on the proper use of our products is at our hands-on cadaveric training facilities in Carlsbad, California and Wayne, Pennsylvania. During 2020, those facilities were temporarily closed due to the pandemic. Access to those facilities continues to be reduced due to the pandemic and in the future we may be required to or elect to temporarily close one or both of

24



them due to the pandemic. Any limits on our ability to use either or both of those facilities will adversely affect our ability to effectively demonstrate the merits of our products compared to those of our competitors.
Surgeons who do not use our products may be hesitant to do so for the following or other reasons:
lack of experience with our products, techniques, or technologies, or with the equipment necessary to use any

16




of the foregoing;
existing relationships with those who sell competitive products;
the time required for surgeon and medical staff education and training on new products, techniques and equipment and technologies;
lack or perceived lack of clinical evidence supporting patient benefit relative to competing products;
our products not being included on hospital formularies, in integrated delivery networks or on group purchasing organization preferred vendor lists;
less attractive coverage and/or reimbursement within healthcare payment systems for our products and procedures compared to other products and procedures;
other costs associated with the introduction ofintroducing new products and the equipment necessary to use new products; and
perceived risk of liability that could be associated with the use of new products, techniques or technologies.

In addition, we believe recommendations and support of our products by influential neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons are essential for market acceptance and adoption. If we do not receive support from such surgeons or long-term data does not show the benefits of using our products, surgeons may not use our products.
If we are not successful in convincing surgeons of the merits of our products, we may be unable tonot maintain or grow our sales or achieve or sustain profitability.
We must successfully educate and train surgeons and their staff on the proper use of our products.
Although most neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons may have adequate knowledge on how to use most of our products based on their clinical training and experience, we believe that the most effective way to introduce and build market demand for our products is by directly training such surgeons in the use of our products. Convincing surgeons to dedicate the time and energy necessary for adequate training is challenging, and we cannot assure you we will be successfulsucceed in these efforts. If surgeons are not properly trained, they may not use our products, and, as a result, we may be unable tonot maintain or grow our sales or achieve or sustain profitability. If surgeons are not properly trained they may also misuse or ineffectively use our products, which may result in unsatisfactory patient outcomes, patient injury, negative publicity or lawsuits against us, any of which could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Although we believe our training methods for surgeons are conducted in compliance with FDA and other applicable regulations developed both nationally and in third countries, if the FDA or other regulatory agency determines that our training constitutes promotion of an unapproved use or promotion of an intended purpose not covered by the current CE mark affixed to our products or FDA approved labeling, they could request that we modify our training or subject us to regulatory enforcement actions, including the issuance of a warning letter, injunction, seizure, civil fine and criminal penalty. See also “Oversight“Risks Related to Non-Compliance with Laws and Regulations - Oversight of the medical device industry might affect the way we sell medical devices and compete in the marketplace" below.
Changes in third-party payment systems and in the healthcare industry may require us to decrease the selling price for our products, may reduce the size of the market for our products, or may eliminate a market, any of which could have a material and adverse effect on our financial performance.
Our operations may be substantially affected by fundamental changes in the political, economic and regulatory landscape of the healthcare industry. Government and private sector initiatives to limit the growth of healthcare costs are continuing in the U.S., and in many other countries where we do business, causing the marketplace to put increased emphasis on the delivery of more cost-effective treatments. These initiatives include price regulation, competitive pricing, coverage and payment policies, comparative effectiveness of therapies, technology assessments and managed-care arrangements.
Maintaining and growing sales of our products depends on the availability of adequate coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors, both within and outside the U.S., including government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, private insurance plans and managed care organizations. Hospitals and other healthcare providers that purchase our products generally rely on third-party payors to cover all or part of the costs associated with the procedures performed with our products, including the cost to purchase our product. Both the patients’ and our customers’ access to adequate coverage and reimbursement for the procedures performed with our products by government and private insurance plans is central to the acceptance of our current and future products. We may be unable to sell our products on a profitable basis, or at all, if third-party payors deny coverage or reduce their levels of payment. In addition, if our cost of production increases at a greater rate than increases in reimbursement levels for our products, our profitability may be adversely affected.

17




The healthcare industry, both within and outside the U.S., has experienced a trend toward cost containment as government and private insurers seek to control rising healthcare costs by imposing lower payment and negotiating reduced contract rates with service providers. Third-party payors continually review their coverage and reimbursement policies for procedures involving the use of our products and can, without notice, eliminate or reduce coverage or reimbursement for our products. For example, a major national third-party insurer in the U.S. recently reduced coverage (from all or most cases to limited indications) for biomechanical devices (e.g., spine cages) used in cervical fusion procedures, stating that the devices had not been shown to be more effective than bone graft. In addition, certain insurers have limited coverage for vertebral fusions in the lumbar spine and other insurers may adopt similar coverage decisions in the future. Patients covered by these insurers may be unwilling or unable to afford lumbar fusion surgeries to treat their conditions, which could materially harm or limit our ability to sell our products designed for such surgeries. Further, third-party payors of hospital services and hospital outpatient services annually revise their payment methodologies, which could result in stricter standards for or the elimination or reduction of reimbursement of hospital charges for certain medical procedures.

Further, in the U.S., a number of the provisions of the U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the Affordable
Care Act) and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 address access to health care products and services
and establish certain fees for the medical device industry. These provisions may be modified, repealed, or otherwise invalidated,
in whole or in part. Future rulemaking could affect rebates, prices or the rate of price increases for health care products and
services, or required reporting and disclosure. We cannot predict the timing or impact of any future rulemaking or changes in
the law.

To the extent we sell our products internationally, market acceptance may depend, in part, upon the availability of coverage and reimbursement within prevailing healthcare payment systems. Reimbursement and healthcare payment systems in international markets vary significantly by country. As in the U.S., our products may not obtain coverage and reimbursement approvals in a timely manner, if at all, in a particular international market. In addition, even if we are able to obtain country-specific coverage and reimbursement approvals, we could incur considerable expense to do so. Our failure to obtain such coverage and approvals would negatively affect market acceptance of our products in the international markets in which such failure occurs and the expenses incurred in connection with obtaining such coverage and approvals could outweigh the benefits of obtaining them.
If the trend by governmental agencies and other third-party payors to reduce coverage of and/or reimbursement for procedures using our products continues, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. Further, we cannot be certain that, under current and future payment systems, the cost of our products will be adequately incorporated into the overall cost of the procedure and, accordingly, we cannot be certain that the procedures performed with our products will be reimbursed at a cost-effective level, or at all.
Industry trends have resulted in increased downward pricing pressure on medical services and products, which may affect our ability to sell our products at prices necessary to support our current business strategy.
The trend toward healthcare cost containment and the growth of managed care organizations is placing increased emphasis on the delivery of more cost-effective medical therapies. For example:
There has been consolidation among healthcare facilities and purchasers of medical devices, particularly in the U.S. One of the results of such consolidation is that group purchasing organizations, integrated delivery networks and large single accounts use their market power to consolidate purchasing decisions, which in turn intensifies competition to provide products and services to healthcare providers and other industry participants, resulting in greater pricing pressures and the exclusion of certain suppliers from important market segments. For example, some group purchasing organizations negotiate pricing for its member hospitals and require us to discount, or limit our ability to increase, prices for certain of our products.
Surgeons increasingly have moved from independent, out-patient practice settings toward employment by hospitals and other larger healthcare organizations, which align surgeons’ product choices with their employers’ price sensitivities and adds to pricing pressures. Hospitals have introduced and may continue to introduce new pricing structures into their contracts to contain healthcare costs, including fixed price formulas and capitated and construct pricing.
Certain hospitals provide financial incentives to doctors for reducing hospital costs (known as gainsharing), rewarding physician efficiency (known as physician profiling) and encouraging partnerships with healthcare service and goods providers to reduce prices.
Existing and proposed laws, regulations and industry policies, in both domestic and international markets, regulate or seek to increase regulation of sales and marketing practices and the pricing and profitability of companies in the healthcare industry.

18





More broadly, other provisions of the Affordable Care Act could meaningfully change the way healthcare is developed and delivered in the U.S., and may adversely affect our business and results of operations. For example, the Affordable Care Act encourages hospitals and physicians to work collaboratively through shared savings programs, such as accountable care organizations, as well as other bundled payment initiatives, which may ultimately result in the reduction of medical device purchases and the consolidation of medical device suppliers used by hospitals. There are many programs and requirements for which the details have not yet been fully established or consequences not fully understood, and it is unclear what the full impact of the legislation will be. We cannot predict accurately what healthcare programs and regulations will ultimately be implemented at the U.S. federal or state level, or the effect of any future legislation or regulation in the U.S. or elsewhere. However, any changes that have the effect of reducing reimbursements for our products or reducing medical procedure volumes could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Further, the proliferation of medical device sales agents that are owned, directly or indirectly, by physicians (commonly referred to as physician-owned distributorships, or PODs) could result in increased pricing pressure on our products or harm our ability to sell our products to physicians who own or are affiliated with these sales agents. These physicians derive a proportion of their revenue from selling or arranging for the sale of medical devices for use in procedures they perform on their own patients at hospitals that agree to purchase from or through the POD, or that otherwise furnish ordering physicians with income that is based, directly or indirectly, on those orders of medical devices. The number of PODs in the spine industry may continue to grow as economic pressures increase throughout the industry and as hospitals, insurers and physicians search for ways to reduce costs and, in the case of the physicians, search for ways to increase their incomes. PODs and the physicians who own, or partially own, them have significant market knowledge and access to the surgeons who use our products and the hospitals that purchase our products. Growth in the number of PODs may reduce our ability to compete effectively for business from physicians who own, or partially own, them, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, the largest device companies with multiple product franchises have increased their effort to leverage and contract broadly with customers across franchises by providing volume discounts and multi-year arrangements that could prevent our access to these customers or make it difficult (or impossible) to compete on price.
We may be unable to develop new products in a timely and consistent manner, and failure to do so may adversely affect the attractiveness of our overall product portfolio to our surgeon customers and negatively impact our sales and market share.
To be and remain competitive, we need to introduce new products and enhancements or modifications to our existing products on a regular basis and successfully respond to technological advances. Doing so is technologically challenging and involves significant risks and uncertainty. Despite substantial investments of time and resources, our research and development efforts may not result in technically feasible new products. Even if technically feasible, the anticipated time and cost of obtaining regulatory approval and/or commercializing a new product may be too great to justify continued development. In addition, competitors could develop products that are more effective, are less expensive to manufacture, are priced more competitively or are ready for commercial introduction before our products. The introduction of new products by our competitors may lead us to reduce the prices of our products, may lead to reduced margins or loss of market share, and may render our products obsolete or noncompetitive. The success of any of our new product offerings or enhancement or modification to our existing products will depend on several factors, including our ability to:
properly identify and anticipate surgeon and patient needs;
develop new products or enhancements or modifications in a timely manner;
obtain the necessary regulatory approvals for new products or product enhancements or modifications in a timely manner;
provide adequate training to potential users of new products and product enhancements or modifications;
receive adequate reimbursement approval of third-party payors such as Medicaid, Medicare and private insurers; and
develop an effective marketing and distribution network.
If we are unable to develop technically and commercially viable new products and enhancements or modifications to our existing products on a consistent basis and before our competitors, our prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

19




It is also important that we carefully manage our introduction of new products and enhancements or modifications to our existing products. If potential customers delay purchases until new or enhanced or modified products are available, it could negatively impact our sales. In addition, to the extent we have excess or obsolete inventory as we transition to new or enhanced or modified products, it would result in margin reducing write-offs for obsolete inventory, and our results of operations may suffer.
If we are unable to maintain and expand our network of independent sales agents and stocking distributors, we may not be able to maintain or grow our revenue.
Our ability to generate revenue depends on the sales and marketing efforts of independent sales agents and stocking distributors. Some of our independent sales agents account for a significant portion of our sales volume. If our independent sales agents and stocking distributors fail to adequately promote, market and sell our products, our sales could significantly decrease. Due to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, most of our independent sales agents currently are working largely using virtual and online engagement tools and tactics, which may be less effective than our ordinary, in-person sales and marketing programs.
Further, we face significant challenges and risks in managing our geographically dispersed distribution network and retaining the independent sales agents and stocking distributors who make up that network, and as we launch new products and

25



increase our marketing efforts with respect to existing products, we plan to expand the reach of our marketing and sales efforts and may need to hire new independent sales agents and stocking distributors. Independent sales agents and stocking distributors require significant technical expertise in various areas such as spinal care practices, spine injuries and disease, and spinal health and they require training and time to achieve full productivity. Because of the intense competition for their services, weWe may be unable tonot attract or retain qualified independent sales agents or stocking distributors or to enter into agreements with them on favorable or commercially reasonable terms, if at all. This could be due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, perceived deficiencies, or gaps, in our existing product portfolio, intense competition for independent sales agents’ services, or because of the disruption associated with restrictive covenants to which distributors may be subject and potential litigation and expense associated therewith. We may also experience unforeseen disengagement from independent sales agents who have worked with us for many years. Even if we do enter into agreements with additional qualified independent sales agents or stocking distributors, it often takes 6 to 12 months for new sales agents or stocking distributors to reach full operational effectiveness and they may not generate revenue as quickly as we expect them to, commit the necessary resources to effectively market and sell our products, or ultimately be successfulsucceed in selling our products. Our success will depend largely on our ability to continue to hire, train, retain and motivate qualified independent sales agents and stocking distributors. If we are unable tocannot expand our sales and marketing capabilities domestically and internationally, if we fail to train new independent sales agents and stocking distributors adequately, or if we experience high turnover in our sales network, we may not be able to commercialize our products adequately, or at all, which would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Moreover, our independent sales agents and stocking distributors are not our employees, we have limited control over their activities and, generally, we do not enter into exclusive relationships with them. If one or more of them were to be retained by a competitor, whether or an exclusive or non-exclusive basis, they may divert business from us to our competitor, which could materially and adversely affect our sales.
Sales of, or the price at which we sell, our products may be adversely affected unless the safety and efficacy of our products, alone and relative to competitive products, is demonstrated in clinical studies.
Generally, we have obtained 510(k) clearance to manufacture, market and sell the products we market in the U.S. and the right to affix the CE mark to the products we market in the European Economic Area, or EEA. To date, we have not been required to generate new clinical data to support our current 510(k) clearances, CE marks, or product registrations in other countriescountries. However, the EU Medical Device Regulations, which replaced the prior medical device directives in May 2021, require submission of certain pre- and accordingly,post-market data to maintain our CE marks, which we do not haveintent to pursue. Additionally, we recently completed an analysis of which of our ownproduct systems will require submission of clinical data regardingpursuant to MEDDEV 2.7.1 rev 4, which sets forth the European Commission’s guidance on the clinical evaluation of medical devices. Accordingly, and in line with our currently marketed products. As a result, neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons may be slowvision to adopt our products anddeliver clinical value, we may be subject to greater regulatory and product liability risks. In addition,have commenced clinical data collection activities for certain of our competitors have clinical data supporting the safety and efficacy of theirmarketed products which may place our products at a competitive disadvantage.as more fully described elsewhere in this "Risk Factors" section.
In part due to the increased emphasis on the delivery of more cost-effective treatments, purchasing decisions of our customers increasingly will be based on clinical data that demonstrates the value of our products or the effectiveness of our products relative to others. Conducting clinical studies is expensive and time-consuming and outcomes are uncertain. See “Risks RelatingRelated to Our Regulatory Environment-ClinicalProduct Development - Clinical studies are expensive and subject to extensive regulation and their results may not support our product candidate claims or may result in the discovery of adverse effects,” below.above. We may elect not to, or may be unable to, fund the clinical studies necessary to generate the data required for all of our products to compete effectively, in part due to the breadth of our product portfolio. Currently, we do not expect to undertake such clinical studies for all of our products and only expect to do so where we anticipate the benefits will outweigh the costs on a risk-adjusted basis. However, even when we elect and are able to fund such clinical studies on one or more of our products, such studies may not be successful.succeed. Data we generate may not be consistent with our existing data and may demonstrate less favorable safety or efficacy, which could reduce demand for our products and negatively impact future sales. Neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons may be less likely to use our products if more robust, or any, clinical data supporting the safety and efficacy of competing products is available. If we are unable to or unwilling to generate clinical data supporting the safety and efficacyeffectiveness of our products, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

20




Further, future patient studies or clinical experience may indicate that treatment with our products does not improve patient outcomes.
With the passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, funds have been appropriated for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Healthcare Research and Quality to conduct comparative effectiveness research to determine the effectiveness of different drugs, medical devices, and procedures in treating certain conditions and diseases.

26



Some of our products or procedures performed with our products could become the subject of such research. It is unknown what effect, if any, this research may have on our business. Further, future research or experience may indicate that treatment with our products does not improve patient outcomes or improves patient outcomes less than we initially expected. Such results would reduce demand for our products, affect sustainable reimbursement from third-party payers, significantly reduce our ability to achieve expected revenue, and could cause us to withdraw our products from the market and could prevent us from sustaining or increasing profitability. Moreover, if future results and experience indicate that our products cause unexpected or serious complications or other unforeseen negative effects, we could be subject to significant legal liability, negative publicity, and damage to our reputation, and we could experience a dramatic reduction in sales of our products, all of which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The spine medical device market has been particularly prone to potential product liability claims that are inherent in the testing, manufacture and sale of medical devices and products for spine surgery procedures.
If any of our manufacturing, development or research facilities are damaged and/or our manufacturing processes are interrupted, we could experience supply disruptions, lost revenues and our business could be seriously harmed.
Damage to our manufacturing, development or research facilities or disruption to our business operations for any reason, including due to natural disaster (such as earthquake, wildfires and other fires or extreme weather), power loss, communications failure, unauthorized entry or other events, such as a flu or other health epidemic (such as the result of the COVID-19 pandemic), could cause us to discontinue development and/or manufacturing of some or all of our products for an undetermined period of time. In addition, our facilities would be difficult to replace and would require substantial lead time to repair or replace. The property damage and business interruption insurance coverage on these facilities that we maintain might not cover all losses under such circumstances, and we may not be able to renew or obtain such insurance in the future on acceptable terms with adequate coverage or at reasonable costs. If our facilities were damaged, they could be difficult to replace and could require substantial lead time to repair or replace. In particular, we manufacture our orthobiologics products in one facility located in Irvine, California and any damage to that facility could adversely affect our ability to timely satisfy demand for those products. Out of an abundance of caution in October 2020, we relocated part of our orthobiologics finished goods inventory from our Irvine facility to our Carlsbad office due to the threat of the Silverado Fire that was causing evacuations throughout Orange County, California. Disruptions to our business operations may result from damage to the facilities of, or disruption to the business operations of, our suppliers. For example, if we are unable to obtain disposables or other materials required to maintain “clean room” sterility in our Irvine facility, we may be unable to continue to manufacture products at that facility, which products account for approximately 50% of our total revenue. Any significant disruption to our manufacturing operations and to our ability to meet market demand likely would have an adverse impact on our sales and revenues as key stakeholders, including our independent sales agents and stocking distributors and surgeon customers, transition to what they perceive as more reliable sources of products.

We are dependentdepend on a limited number of third-party suppliers for processing activities, components and raw materials and the loss oflosing any of these suppliers, or their inability to provide us with an adequate supply of materials that meet our quality and other requirements, could harm our business.
Outside suppliers, some of whom are sole-source suppliers, provide us with products and raw materials and components used in the manufacture ofmanufacturing our orthobiologics and spinal implant products. We strive to maintain sufficient inventory of products, raw materials and components so that our production will not be significantly disrupted if a particular product, raw material or component is not available to us for a period of time.time, including as a result of a supplier's loss of its ISO or other certification or as a result of any of the disruptions described above under the risk factor titled “If any of our manufacturing, development or research facilities are damaged and/or our manufacturing processes are interrupted, we could experience supply disruptions, lost revenues and our business could be seriously harmed.” For example, a certain number of our products require titanium, which is sourced from third party suppliers. While the titanium required for such products is not directly sourced from Russia, the current geopolitical events involving Russia and Ukraine is negatively impacting the wider titanium supply chain and such geopolitical events and factors relating thereto or resulting therefrom, including the imposition of sanctions, may negatively impactthe ability of our local supply sources to timely supply titanium to us.In addition, some of our suppliers may choose to discontinue making their products available in the EU rather than follow MDR, which would require us to identify alternate supply sources for those products. Any such disruption in our production could harm our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.
Although we believe there are alternative supply sources replacing our current suppliers may be impractical or difficult in many instances. For example, we could have difficulty obtaining similar services or products from other suppliers that are acceptable to the FDA or other foreign regulatory authorities.authorities and who are able to provide the appropriate supply volumes at an acceptable cost. In addition, if we are required to transition to new suppliers for certain services or components of our products, the use of services, components or materials furnished by these alternative suppliers could require us to alter our operations, and if we are

27



required to change the manufacturer of a critical component of our products, we will be requiredhave to verify that the new manufacturer maintains facilities, procedures and operations that comply with our quality and applicable regulatory requirements, which could further impede our ability to manufacture our products in a timely manner. Transitioning to a new supplier could be time-consuming and expensive, may result in interruptions in our operations and product delivery, could affect the performance specifications of our products or could require that we modify the design of those systems.
If we are unable to obtain sufficient quantities of spinal implant products, raw materials or components that meet our quality and other requirements on a timely basis for any reason, we may not be able to produce sufficient quantities of our products to meet market demand until a new or alternative supply source is identified and qualified and, as a result, we could lose customers, our reputation could be harmed and our business could suffer. In 2013, we experienced supply shortages in collagen ceramic matrix

21




bone void fillers, which adversely affected sales of our orthobiologics products, even after the supply shortage was resolved. Furthermore, an uncorrected defect or supplier’s variation in a component or raw material that is incompatible with our manufacturing, unknown to us, could harm our ability to manufacture products.
Further, under the FDA Safety and Innovation Act of 2012, or the FDASIA, which includes the Medical Device User Fee Amendments of 2012, as well as other medical device provisions, all U.S. and foreign manufacturers must have a FDA Establishment Registration and complete Medical Device listings for sales in the U.S. While we believe that our facilities materially comply with these requirements, we also source products from foreign contract manufacturers. It is possible that some of our foreign contract manufacturers will not comply with applicable requirements and choose not to register with the FDA. In such an event, we will need to determine if there are alternative foreign contract manufacturers who comply with the applicable requirements. If such a foreign contract manufacturer is a sole supplier of one of our products, there is a risk that we may not be able to source another supplier.
In addition,Furthermore, we rely on a small number of tissue banks accredited by the American Association of Tissue Banks for the supply of human tissue, a crucial component of our orthobiologics products that serve as bone graft substitutes. Any failure to obtain tissue from these sources or to have the tissue processed by these sources for us in a timely manner will interfere with our ability to meet demand for our orthobiologics products effectively. The processing of human tissue into orthobiologics products is labor intensive and maintaining a steady supply stream is challenging. In addition, due to seasonal changes in mortality rates, some scarce tissues used for our orthobiologics products are at times in particularly short supply. If governments require additional donor testing due to COVID-19, this could also strain the supply of tissue. We cannot be certain that our supply of human tissue from our current suppliers will be available at current levels or will be sufficient to meet our needs or that we will be able to successfully negotiate commercially reasonable terms with other accredited tissue banks.

Unfavorable media reports or other negative publicity concerning both alleged improper methods of tissue recovery from donors and disease transmission from donated tissue could limit widespread acceptance of some of our products.
Unfavorable reports of improper or illegal tissue recovery practices, both in the U.S. and internationally, as well as incidents of improperly processed tissue leading to the transmission of disease, may affect the rate of future tissue donation and market acceptance of technologies incorporating human tissue. In addition, negative publicity could cause the families of potential donors to become reluctant to donate tissue to for-profit tissue processors. For example, the media has reported examples of alleged illegal harvesting of body parts from cadavers and resulting recalls conducted by certain companies selling human tissue-based products affected by the alleged illegal harvesting. These reports and others could have a negative effect on our tissue regeneration business.
Risks Related to Pricing and Reimbursement and Industry Trends
Changes in third-party payment systems and in the healthcare industry may require us to decrease the selling price for our products, may reduce the size of the market for our products, or may eliminate a market, any of which could have a material and adverse effect on our financial performance.
Our operations may be substantially affected by fundamental changes in the political, economic and regulatory landscape of the healthcare industry. Government and private sector initiatives to limit the growth of healthcare costs are continuing in the U.S., and in many other countries where we do business, causing the marketplace to put increased emphasis on the delivery of more cost-effective treatments. These initiatives include price regulation, competitive pricing, coverage and payment policies, comparative effectiveness of therapies, technology assessments and managed-care arrangements.
Maintaining and growing sales of our products depends on the availability of adequate coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors, both within and outside the U.S., including government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, private insurance plans and managed care organizations. Hospitals and other healthcare providers that purchase our products generally

28



rely on third-party payors to cover all or part of the costs associated with the procedures performed with our products, including the cost to purchase our product. Both the patients’ and our customers’ access to adequate coverage and reimbursement for the procedures performed with our products by government and private insurance plans is central to the acceptance of our current and future products. We are dependentmay be unable to sell our products on information technology anda profitable basis, or at all, if third-party payors deny coverage or reduce their levels of payment. In addition, if our information technology failscost of production increases at a rate greater than increases in reimbursement levels for our products, our profitability may be adversely affected.
The healthcare industry, both within and outside the U.S., has experienced a trend toward cost containment as government and private insurers seek to operate adequately or fails to properly maintaincontrol rising healthcare costs by imposing lower payment and negotiating reduced contract rates with service providers. Third-party payors continually review their coverage and reimbursement policies for procedures involving the integrityuse of our data,products and can, without notice, eliminate or reduce coverage or reimbursement for our products. For example, in the past, a major national third-party insurer in the U.S. reduced coverage (from all or most cases to limited indications) for biomechanical devices (e.g., spine cages) used in cervical fusion procedures, stating that the devices had not been shown to be more effective than bone graft. In addition, certain insurers have limited coverage for vertebral fusions in the lumbar spine and other insurers may adopt similar coverage decisions in the future. Patients covered by these insurers may be unwilling or unable to afford lumbar fusion surgeries to treat their conditions, which could materially harm or limit our ability to sell our products designed for such surgeries. Further, third-party payors of hospital services and hospital outpatient services annually revise their payment methodologies, which could result in stricter standards for or the elimination or reduction of reimbursement of hospital charges for certain medical procedures.
Further, in the U.S., several provisions of the U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the Affordable Care Act) and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 address access to health care products and services and establish certain fees for the medical device industry. These provisions may be modified, repealed, or otherwise invalidated, in whole or in part. Future rulemaking could affect rebates, prices or the rate of price increases for health care products and services, or required reporting and disclosure. We cannot predict the timing or impact of any future rulemaking or changes in the law.
To the extent we sell our products internationally, market acceptance may depend, in part, upon the availability of coverage and reimbursement within prevailing healthcare payment systems. Reimbursement and healthcare payment systems in international markets vary significantly by country. As in the U.S., our products may not obtain coverage and reimbursement approvals in a timely manner, if at all, in a particular international market. In addition, even if we obtain country-specific coverage and reimbursement approvals, we could incur considerable expense to do so. Our failure to obtain such coverage and approvals would negatively affect market acceptance of our products in the international markets in which such failure occurs and the expenses incurred in connection with obtaining such coverage and approvals could outweigh the benefits of obtaining them.
If the trend by governmental agencies and other third-party payors to reduce coverage of and/or reimbursement for procedures using our products continues, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. Further, we cannot be certain that, under current and future payment systems, the cost of our products will be adequately incorporated into the overall cost of the procedure and, accordingly, we cannot be certain that the procedures performed with our products will be reimbursed at a cost-effective level, or at all.
Industry trends have resulted in increased downward pricing pressure on medical services and products, which may affect our ability to sell our products at prices necessary to support our current business strategy.
The trend toward healthcare cost containment through aggregating purchasing decisions and industry consolidation, along with the growth of managed care organizations, has placed increased emphasis on the delivery of more cost-effective medical therapies. For example:
There has been consolidation among healthcare facilities and purchasers of medical devices, particularly in the U.S. One of the results of such consolidation is that group purchasing organizations, integrated delivery networks and large single accounts use their market power to consolidate purchasing decisions, which intensifies competition to provide products and services to healthcare providers and other industry participants, resulting in greater pricing pressures and the exclusion of certain suppliers from important market segments. For example, some group purchasing organizations negotiate pricing for its member hospitals and require us to discount, or limit our ability to increase, prices for certain of our products. In particular, certain of our DBM products are priced at a premium to competitors' DBM products and a significant price reduction could result in a material adverse effect on our profitability.

29



Surgeons increasingly have moved from independent, out-patient practice settings toward employment by hospitals and other larger healthcare organizations, which align surgeons’ product choices with their employers’ price sensitivities and adds to pricing pressures. Hospitals have introduced and may continue to introduce new pricing structures into their contracts to contain healthcare costs, including fixed price formulas and capitated and construct pricing.
Certain hospitals provide financial incentives to doctors for reducing hospital costs (known as gainsharing), rewarding physician efficiency (known as physician profiling) and encouraging partnerships with healthcare service and goods providers to reduce prices.
Existing and proposed laws, regulations and industry policies, in both domestic and international markets, regulate or seek to increase regulation of sales and marketing practices and the pricing and profitability of companies in the healthcare industry.
More broadly, other provisions of the Affordable Care Act could meaningfully change the way healthcare is developed and delivered in the U.S., and may adversely affect our business and results of operations. For example, the Affordable Care Act encourages hospitals and physicians to work collaboratively through shared savings programs, such as accountable care organizations, as well as other bundled payment initiatives, which may ultimately result in the reduction of medical device purchases and the consolidation of medical device suppliers used by hospitals. It is unclear what the full impact of the legislation will be.Some of the provisions of the Affordable Care Act have yet to be fully implemented, and certain provisions have been subject to legal and Congressional challenges. Persisting uncertainty with respect to the scope and effect of certain provisions of the Affordable Care Act have made compliance costly. A case challenging the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate is currently before the Supreme Court of the United States. We depend significantly on sophisticated information technology,cannot predict whether the Affordable Care Act will be repealed, replaced, or IT,modified, or how such repeal, replacement or modification may be timed or structured. The change in Presidential Administration may also result in new agency priorities, rulemakings, and legislation, the scope and effect of which cannot be predicted. As a result, we cannot predict accurately what healthcare programs and regulations will ultimately be implemented at the U.S. federal or state level, or the effect of any future legislation or regulation in the U.S. or elsewhere. However, any changes that have the effect of reducing reimbursements for our infrastructure and to support business decisions. Our IT needs require an ongoing commitment of significant resources to maintain, protect and enhance existing systems and to develop new systems to keep pace with new technology, evolving regulatory standards, the increasing need to protect patient and customer information and changing customer patterns. Currently, we do not have a comprehensive IT disaster recovery plan. Any significant breakdown, intrusion, interruption, corruptionproducts or destruction of any component of our IT systemsreducing medical procedure volumes could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Security breaches, lossFurther, the proliferation of data and other disruptionsmedical device sales agents that are owned, directly or indirectly, by physicians (commonly called physician-owned distributorships, or PODs) could compromise sensitive information related to our business, prevent us from accessing critical information or expose us to liability, which could adversely affect our business and our reputation.
In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including legally protected patient health information, credit card information, personally identifiable information about our employees, intellectual property, and proprietary business information. We manage and maintain our applications and data utilizing on-site systems. These applications and data encompass a wide variety of business critical information including research and development information, commercial information and business and financial information.
Although our computer and information systems are protected through physical and software safeguards, they are still vulnerable to system malfunction, computer viruses, cyber-attacks, breaches or interruptions due to employee error or malfeasance, terrorist attacks, earthquakes (and other natural disasters), fire, flood, power loss, computer systems failure, data network failure, Internet failure, or lapses in compliance with privacy and security mandates. If any of our systems were to become subject to any of the foregoing, our networks could be compromised, and the information stored there could be accessed by unauthorized parties, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. These events could lead to the unauthorized access and result in the misappropriation or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information belonging to us or to our employees, partners, customers or suppliers. We have measures in place that are designed to detect and respond to security incidents and breaches of privacy and security mandates. The techniques used by criminal elements to attack computer systems are sophisticated, change frequently and may originate from less regulated and remote areas of the world. As a result, we may not be able to address these techniques proactively or implement adequate preventative measures. If our IT systems are compromised, due to a data breach or otherwise, we could be subject to legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, such as HIPAA, government enforcement actions and regulatory penalties, fines, damages, and enforcement actions, and we could lose trade secrets or other confidential information, the occurrence of any of which could have a material and adverse effectincreased pricing pressure on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Unauthorized access, lossproducts or dissemination could also interrupt our operations, includingharm our ability to billsell our customers, provide customer support services, conduct research and development activities, process and prepare company financial information, manage various general and administrative aspects of our business, and could damage our

22




reputation, any of which could adversely affect our business.
We expend substantial resourcesproducts to comply with laws and regulations relating to public companies, and any failure to maintain compliance could subject us to regulatory scrutiny and cause investors to lose confidence in our company, which could harm our business and have a material adverse effect on our stock price.
Laws and regulations affecting public companies, including provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), and the related rules and regulations adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and by the Nasdaq Stock Market increase our accounting, legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming and costly. We cannot predictphysicians who own or estimate with any reasonable accuracy the total amount or timing of the costs we may incur to complyare affiliated with these laws and regulations. In addition, we expectsales agents. These physicians derive a proportion of their revenue from selling or arranging for the sale of medical devices for use in procedures they perform on their own patients at hospitals that our management and other personnel will needagree to divert attentionpurchase from operational and other business matters to devote substantial time to these matters. For example, complianceor through the POD, or that otherwise furnish ordering physicians with Section 404income based, directly or indirectly, on those orders of SOX, including performing the system and process documentation and evaluation necessary to issue our annual report on the effectivenessmedical devices. The number of our internal control over financial reporting and, if applicable, obtain the required attestation report from our independent registered public accounting firm, requires us to incur substantial expense and expend significant management time. Further, we (through our former parent company) havePODs in the past discovered,spine industry may continue to grow as economic pressures increase throughout the industry and as hospitals, insurers and physicians search for ways to reduce costs and, in the future may discover, areascase of internal controlsthe physicians, search for ways to increase their incomes. PODs and the physicians who own, or partially own, them have significant market knowledge and access to the surgeons who use our products and the hospitals that need improvement. If we identify deficiencies inpurchase our internal controls that are deemed to be material weaknesses, we could become subject to scrutiny by regulatory authorities and we could lose investor confidenceproducts. Growth in the accuracy and completenessnumber of our SEC filings, including the financial statements included therein, which could have a material adverse effect on our stock price. Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error and circumvention by collusion or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even an effective internal control systemPODs may not prevent or detect material misstatements on a timely basis, or at all. Also, previously effective controls may become inadequate over time because of changes in our business or operating structure, and we may fail to take measures to evaluate the adequacy of and update these controls, as necessary, which could lead to a material misstatement.
In addition, new laws and regulations could make it more difficult or more costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the coverage that is the same or similar to our current coverage. The impact of these events could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or on board committees, or as our executive officers.
Our business could suffer if we lose the services of key members of our senior management or fail to hire and retain other personnel on whom our business relies.
Our ability to execute our business strategy and compete in the highly competitive medical device industry depends, in part, onreduce our ability to attract and retain highly qualified personnel. Companies in the medical device industry in general have experienced a high rate of personnel turnover. Loss of key employees, including any of our scientific, technical and managerial personnel, could adversely affect our ability to successfully execute our currentcompete effectively for business strategy,from physicians who own, or partially own, them, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We would be adversely affected if we fail to adequately prepare for future turnover of our senior management team. Moreover, replacing key employees may be a difficult, costly and protracted process, and we may not have other personnel with the capacity to assume all of the responsibilities of a departing employee. Competition for qualified personnel, particularly for key positions, is intense among companies in our industry, particularly in the San Diego, California area, and many of the organizations against which we compete for qualified personnel have greater financial and other resources and different risk profiles than our company, which may make them more attractive employers. All of our employees, including our management personnel, may terminate their employment with us at any time without notice. If we cannot attract and retain highly qualified personnel, as needed, we may not achieve our financial and other goals.
Moreover, future internal growth could impose significant added responsibilities on our management, and we will need to identify, recruit, maintain, motivate and integrate additional employees to manage growth effectively. If we are unable to effectively manage such growth, our expenses may increase more than expected, we may not be able to achieve our goals, and our ability to generate and/or grow revenue could be diminished.
We may have significant product liability exposure and our insurance may not cover all potential claims.
We are exposed to product liability and other claims. Spine surgery involves significant risk of serious complications, including bleeding, nerve injury, paralysis and even death. In addition, if neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons are not sufficiently trained in the use of our products, they may misuse or ineffectively use our products, which may result in unsatisfactory patient

23




outcomes or patient injury. We could become the subject of product liability lawsuits alleging that component failures, malfunctions, manufacturing flaws, design defects, or inadequate disclosure of product-related risks or product-related information resulted in an unsafe condition or injury to patients. In addition, the development of allograft implantslargest device companies with multiple product franchises have increased their effort to leverage and technologies for human tissue repaircontract broadly with customers across franchises by providing volume discounts and treatment may entail particular risk of transmitting diseasesmulti-year arrangements that could prevent our access to human recipients, and any such transmission could result in the assertion of product liability claims against us.these customers or make it difficult (or impossible) to compete on price.
Product liability claims are expensive to defend, divert our management’s attention and, if we are not successful in defending the claim, can result in substantial monetary awards against us or costly settlements. Further, successful product liability claims made against one or more of our competitors could cause claims to be made against us or expose us to a perception that we are vulnerable to similar claims. Any product liability claim brought against us, with or without merit and regardless of the outcome or whether it is fully pursued, may result in: decreased demand for our products; injuryRisks Related to our reputation; significant litigation costs; product recalls; loss of revenue; the inability to commercialize new products or product candidates;Financial Results and adverse publicity regarding our products. Any of these may have a material and adverse effect on our reputation with existing and potential customers and on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our existing product liability insurance coverage may be inadequate to protect us from any liabilities we might incur. If a product liability claim or series of claims is brought against usNeed for uninsured liabilities or more than our insurance coverage, our business could suffer. In addition, a recall of some of our products, whether or not the result of a product liability claim, could result in significant costs and loss of customers.
Our insurance policies are expensive and protect us only from some risks, which will leave us exposed to significant uninsured liabilities.Financing
We do not carry insuranceexpect to incur losses for all categories of risk to which our business is or may be exposed. Some of the policies we currently maintain include general liability, foreign liability, employee benefits liability, property, umbrella, employment practices, workers’ compensation, products liabilityforeseeable future and directors’ and officers’ insurance. We do not know, however, ifcannot assure you that we will be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable costgenerate sufficient sales to achieve or in sufficient amounts or scope to protect us against losses. Even if we obtain insurance, a claim could exceed the amount of our insurance coverage or it may be excluded from coverage under the terms of the policy. Any significant uninsured liability may require us to pay substantial amounts, which would adversely affect our cash position and results of operations.sustain profitability.
Our strategy could involve growth through acquisitions, which would require usWe expect to incur substantial costs and potential liabilitieslosses for whichthe foreseeable future as we may never realize the anticipated benefits.
We may grow our business through acquisitions, a strategy which ultimately could prove unsuccessful. Any new acquisition could result in material transaction expenses, increased interest and amortization expense, increased depreciation expense, increased operating expense and possible in-process research and development charges for acquisitions that do not meet the definition of a “business,” any of which could have a material and adverse effect on our operating results.
In addition, businesses that we acquire may not have adequate financial, disclosure, regulatory, quality or other compliance controls in place at the time we acquire them, which may create uncertainty regarding the actual condition and financial results of the acquired business and our assumptions regarding synergies and future results. Following any acquisition, we must integrate the new business, which includes incorporating it into our financial, compliance, regulatory and quality systems. Failurededicate significant resources to timely and successfully integrate acquired businesses may result in non-compliance with regulatory or other requirements and may result in unexpected costs, including as a result of inadequate cost containment and unrealized economies of scale. In addition, acquisitions divert management and other resources, and involve other risks, including, risks associated with entering markets in which our marketing and sales personnel may have limited experienceproduct development strategy, including as we continue to: (i) develop new and with disruption to existing relationships with employees, suppliers, customersnext generation products and sales agents, both with respect to us and the acquired company. As a resultproduct line extensions (all of any of the foregoing, we may not realize the expected benefit from any acquisition. If we cannot integrate acquired businesses, products or technologies, our business, financial conditions and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Furthermore, as a result of acquisitions of other healthcare businesses, we may be subject to the risk of unanticipated business uncertainties, regulatory and other compliance matters or legal liabilities relating to those acquired businesses for which the sellers of the acquired businesses may not indemnify us, for which we may not be ablecall “new products”); (ii) develop new medical techniques designed to obtain insurance (or adequate insurance) or for whichenhance the indemnification may not be sufficient to cover the ultimate liabilities.

24




We are exposed to a variety of risks relating to our international sales and operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, approximately 10%utility of our net revenue was attributableproducts; (iii) collect clinical data and conduct clinical studies to our international sales and operations. We are seeking to increase our international sales over the foreseeable future. Our international business operations are subject to a variety of risks, including:
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign and geographically dispersed operations;
having to comply with various U.S. and international laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 and anti-money laundering laws (see also, “Our international operations subject us to laws regarding sanctioned countries, entities and persons, customs and import-export practices, laws regarding transactions in foreign countries, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 and local anti-bribery and other laws regarding interactions with healthcare professionals, and product registration requirements” below);
having to comply with export control laws, including, but not limited to, the Export Administration Regulations and trade sanctions against embargoed countries, which are administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control within the Department of the Treasury, as well as the laws and regulations administered by the Department of Commerce;
differing regulatory requirements for obtaining clearances or approvals to market our products;
changes in, or uncertainties relating to, foreign rules and regulations that may impact our ability to selldifferentiate our products perform services or repatriate profits to the United States;
tariffs and trade barriers, export regulations and other regulatory and contractual limitations on our ability to sell our products in certain foreign markets;
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;
limitations on or increase of withholding and other taxes on remittances and other payments by foreign subsidiaries or joint ventures;
differing multiple payer reimbursement regimes, government payers or patient self-pay systems;
differing labor laws and standards;
economic, political or social instability in foreign countries and regions;
an inability, or reduced ability, to protect our intellectual property, including any effect of compulsory licensing imposed by government action; and
availability of government subsidies or other incentives that benefit competitors in their local markets that are not available to us.

Any reduction in international sales, or our failure to further develop our international markets, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our results may be impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
As a result of our international sales and operations, we generate revenues in various foreign currencies including euros, British pounds, and Swiss francs, and in U.S. dollar-denominated transactions conducted with customers who generate revenue in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We also incur operating expenses in euros. We cannot predict accurately the consolidated effects of exchange rate fluctuations upon our future operating results because of the variability of currency exposure in our revenues and operating expenses and the potential volatility of currency exchange rates. Although we address currency risk management through regular operating and financing activities,from those actions may not prove to be fully effective. In addition, for those foreign customers who purchase our products in U.S. dollars, currency exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the currencies in which those customers do business may have a negative effect on the demand for our products in foreign countries where the U.S. dollar has increased in value compared to the local currency. Converting our earnings from international operations to U.S. dollars for use in the U.S. can also raise challenges, including problems moving funds out of the countries in which the funds were earned and difficulties in collecting accounts receivable in foreign countries where the usual accounts receivable payment cycle is longer. To date, we have not used risk management techniques to hedge the risks associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Even if we were to implement hedging strategies, not every exposure can be hedged and, where hedges are put in place based on expected foreign currency exchange exposure, they are based on forecasts that may vary or that may later prove to have been inaccurate. As a result, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates or our failure to successfully hedge against these fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

25




We may be subject to damages resulting from claims that we, our employees, or our independent sales agents or stocking distributors have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of our competitors or are in breach of non-competition or non-solicitation agreements with our competitors.
Manyand to demonstrate the value of our employees were previously employed at other medical device companies, including our competitors or potential competitors, in some cases immediately priorproducts to joining us. In addition, many of ourcurrent and prospective customers and payors; (iv) add independent sales agents and stocking distributors sell,to increase our geographic sales coverage and penetration; (v) increase product inventory to raise the likelihood of

30



success of new product launches; and (vi) invest in our Irvine manufacturing facility; (vii) expand our marketing campaigns and surgeon education and training programs. We cannot assure you that we will ever generate sufficient revenues from our operations to achieve profitability and, even if we achieve profitability, we cannot assure you that we will remain profitable. Our failure to achieve or inmaintain profitability could negatively affect the past have sold, productsvalue of our competitors. We may be subject to claims that we, our employees or our independent sales agents or stocking distributors have intentionally, inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of former employers or competitors. In addition, we have beensecurities and may in the future be subject to claims that we caused an employee to breach the terms of his or her non-competition or non-solicitation agreement. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Litigation is expensive, time-consuming and could divert management attention and resources away from our business. Even if we prevail, the cost of litigation could affect our profitability. If we do not prevail, in addition to any damages we might have to pay, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or employees, independent sales agents or stocking distributors. There can be no assurance that this type of litigation or the threat thereof will not adversely affect our ability to engageattract and retain key employees, sales agents or stocking distributors. See also “If we are unable to maintain and expand our network of independent sales agents and stocking distributors, we may not be able to maintain or grow our revenue,” and “Our business could suffer if we lose the services of key members of our senior management or fail to hire and retain other personnel, on whomraise capital, execute our business relies,” above.
We are subject to continuing contingent liabilities of Integra.
Even after our separation from Integra, there are several significant areas where Integra’s liabilities may become our obligations. For example, under the Code and the related rules and regulations, each corporation that was a member of the Integra consolidated U.S. federal income tax reporting group during any taxable periodstrategy or portion of any taxable period ending on or before the effective time of the distribution is jointly and severally liable for the U.S. federal income tax liability of the entire Integra consolidated tax reporting group for that taxable period. In addition, the Tax Matters Agreement allocates the responsibility for prior period taxes of the Integra consolidated tax reporting group between us and Integra. Pursuant to this allocation, we may be responsible for taxes that we would not have otherwise incurred, or that we would have incurred but in different amounts and/or at different times, on a standalone basis outside of the Integra consolidated group, and the amount of such taxes could be significant. If Integra is unable to pay any prior period taxes for which it is responsible, we could be required to pay the entire amount of such taxes.
We have overlapping board membership with Integra, which may lead to conflicting interests, and one of our directors continues to own a substantial amount of Integra common stock and equity awards covering Integra stock.
Several of our board members also serve as board members of Integra. Our directors who are members of Integra’s board of directors have fiduciary duties to Integra’s stockholders, as well as fiduciary duties to our stockholders. In addition, several of our directors own or have rights to acquire Integra common stock (in at least one case, a substantial amount).
As a result of the foregoing, there may be the appearance of a conflict of interest and there is the potential for a conflict of interest with respect to matters involving or affecting both companies, such as when we or Integra consider acquisitions and other corporate opportunities that may be suitable for each company. In addition, potential conflicts of interest could arise in connection with the resolution of any dispute that may arise between Integra and us regarding the terms of the agreements governing our separation from Integra, the Tax Matters Agreement or under other agreements between Integra and us, including with respect to indemnification matters. From time to time, we may enter into transactions with Integra and/or its subsidiaries or other affiliates. There can be no assurance that the terms of any such transactions will be as favorable to us, Integra or any of our or their subsidiaries or affiliates as would be the case were there no overlapping board membership or ownership interest.
Risks Relating to our Financial Results and need for Financingcontinue operations.
Our sales volumes and our operating results may fluctuate.
Our sales volumes and our operating results, including components of operating results, such as gross margin and cost of goods sold, have fluctuated in the past and may fluctuate from time to time in the future, including over the course of a fiscal year, and such fluctuations could affect our stock price. Some of the factors that may cause these fluctuations include:
economic conditions worldwide, including arising from or relating to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, which could affect the ability of hospitals and other customers to purchase our products and could result in a reduction in elective and non-reimbursed operative procedures;

26




increased competition;
market acceptance of our existing products, as well as products in development, and the demand for, and pricing of, our products and the products of our competitors;
costs, benefits and timing of new product introductions;
the timing of or failure to obtain regulatory clearances or approvals for new products;
lost sales and other expenses resulting from stoppages in our or third parties’ production, including as a result of product recalls or field corrective actions;
the availability and cost of components and materials, including raw materials such as human tissue;
accurate predictions of product demand and production capabilities sufficient to meet that demand;
our ability to realize expected yield improvements and scrap reduction initiatives that we have undertaken at our Irvine facility;
higher than anticipated independent sales agent commissions;
our ability to purchase or manufacture and ship our products efficiently and in sufficient quantities to meet sales demands;
the timing of our research and development expenditures;
expenditures for major initiatives;
reimbursement, changes in reimbursement or denials in coverage for our products by third-party payors, such as Medicare, Medicaid, private and public health insurers and foreign governmental health systems;
the ability of our independent sales agents and stocking distributors to achieve expected sales targets and for new agents and stocking distributors to become familiar with our products in a timely manner;
peer-reviewed publications discussing the clinical effectiveness of our products;
inspections of our manufacturing facilities for compliance with the FDA's Quality System Regulations (Good Manufacturing Practices), which could result in Form 483 observations, warning letters, injunctions or other adverse findings from the FDA or equivalent foreign regulatory bodies, and corrective actions, procedural changes and other actions, including product recalls, that we determine are necessary or appropriate to address the results of those inspections, any of which may affect production and our ability to supply our customers with our products;
the costs to comply with new regulations from the FDA or equivalent foreign regulatory bodies, such as the requirements to establish a unique device identification system to adequately identify medical devices through their distribution and use;
the increased regulatory scrutiny of certain of our products, including products we manufacture for others, which could result in their being removed from the market;
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; and
the impact of acquisitions, including the impact of goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges, if future operating results of the acquired businesses are significantly less than the results anticipated at the time of the acquisitions.


31



In addition, we may experience meaningful variability in our sales and gross profit among quarters, as well as within each quarter, as a result of a number ofseveral factors, including but not limited to (and in addition to those listed above):
the number of products sold in the quarter;
the unpredictability of sales of full sets of spinal implants and instruments to our international stocking distributors; and
the number of selling days in the quarter.

We must maintain high levels of inventory, which could consume a significant amount of our resources and reduce our cash flows.
Because we maintain substantial inventory levels to meet the needs of our customers, we are subject to the risk of inventory excess, obsolescence and shelf-life expiration. Many of our spinal implant products come in sets. Each set includes a significant number of components in various sizes so that the surgeon may select the appropriate spinal implant based on the patient’s needs. In a typical surgery, not all of the implants in the set are used, and therefore certain sizes of implants placed in the set or that we purchase for replenishment inventory may become obsolete before they can be used. In addition, to market our products effectively, we often must provide hospitals and independent sales agents with consigned sets that typically consist of spinal implants and instruments, including products to ensure redundancy and products of different sizes. Further, our orthobiologics products have expiration dates, which range from one to five years, and these products may expire before they can be used. If a substantial portion of our inventory is deemed excess, becomes obsolete or expires, it could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and cash flows due to the resulting costs associated with the inventory impairment charges and costs required to replace such inventory. Further, as we increasingly launch new products and product systems, we may cannibalize older products and product systems, which could exacerbate excess and obsolete charges.
Our future financial results could be adversely affected by impairments or other charges.
We assess periodically impairment of our long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. As of December 31, 2021, we had $42.1 million of net finite-lived intangible assets, consisting of technology, customer relationships, trademarks/brand names, and other intangibles. In addition, we continually assess the profitability of our product lines and, after such assessment, may discontinue certain products or product lines in the future. As a result, we may record impairment charges or accelerate amortization on certain technology-related intangible assets in the future. Impairment charges as a result of any of the foregoing could be significant and could have a material and adverse effect on our reported financial results for the period in which the charge is taken, which could have a material and adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
Continuing economic instability, including challenges faced by European countries, may adversely affect the ability of hospitals and other customers to access funds or otherwise have available liquidity, which could reduce orders for our products or impede our ability to obtain new customers, particularly in European markets.
Continuing economic instability, including challenges faced by European countries and challenges arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, may adversely affect the ability of hospitals and other customers to access funds to enable them to fund their operating budgets. As a result, hospitals and other customers may reduce budgets or put all or part of their budgets on hold or close their operations, which could have a negative effect on our sales and could impede our ability to obtain new customers, particularly in European markets. Governmental austerity policies in Europe and other markets have reduced and could continue to reduce the amount of money available to purchase medical products, including our products. If such conditions persist, they could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our future capital needs are uncertain and we may need to raise additional funds in the future, and such funds may not be available on acceptable terms or at all.
We believe that our cash and cash equivalents and the borrowing capacity that we haveamount currently available to us under theour amended and restated credit facility that we entered into in December 2015agreement with Wells Fargo, N.A. will be sufficient to meet our projected operating requirements over the next 12 months. That said, continued expansion of our business will be expensive, and we maylikely will seek additional capital. Our capital requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to:
the revenue generated by sales of our products;
the costs associated with expanding our sales and marketing efforts;

32



the expenses we incur in procuring, manufacturing and selling our products;
the scope, rate of progress and cost of our clinical studies;
the cost of obtaining and maintaining regulatory approval or clearance of our products and products in development;
the costs associated with complying with state, federal and international laws and regulations;regulations, including increased costs associated with the United Kingdom's exit from the European Union and the European Union's new Medical Device Regulations;
the cost of filing and prosecuting patent applications and defending and enforcing our patent and other intellectual property rights;

27




the cost of defending, in litigation or otherwise, any claims that we infringe third-party patent or other intellectual property rights;
the cost of enforcing or defending against non-competition claims;
the number and timing of acquisitions and other strategic transactions;
the costs associated with increased capital expenditures, including fixed asset purchases of instrument sets which we consign to hospitals and independent sales agents to support surgeries; and
anticipated and unanticipated general and administrative expenses, including insurance expenses.

We may seek to raise additional capital to:
maintain, and, where necessary, increase appropriate product inventory and spinal instruments levels;
fund our operations and clinical studies;
continue, and, where appropriate, increase our research and development activities;
file, prosecute and defend our intellectual property rights, and defend, in litigation or otherwise, any claims that we infringe third-party patents or other intellectual property rights;
address the FDA or other governmental, legal or enforcement actions and remediate underlying problems and address investigations or inquiries into sales and marketing practices from governmental agencies worldwide;
commercialize our new products, if any such products receive regulatory clearance or approval for sale; and
acquire companies' new products, technology or intellectual property.

Such capital, which we may seek to raise through public or private equity offerings, issuing debt or existing, expanded or new credit facilities, or other sources, may not be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. For example, LIBOR is one of the reference rates under our credit agreement and is the subject of recent proposals for reform that could impact the interest rate we pay under the credit agreement.  To the extent we have outstanding borrowings under the credit agreement at the time a LIBOR alternative becomes applicable, our borrowing costs under the credit agreement may increase. In addition, our December 2015 credit agreement prohibits us from incurring indebtedness without the lender’s consent. If we issue equity securities to raise additional capital, our existing stockholders may experience dilution, and the new equity securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our existing stockholders. See “Risks RelatingRelated to Owning Our Common Stock-Your percentage of ownership in us may be diluted in the future and issuances of substantial amounts of our common stock, or the perception that such issuances may occur, could cause the market price of our common stock to decline significantly, even if our business is performing well.,” and “Risks RelatingRelated to Owning Our Common Stock-We may issue preferred stock with terms that could dilute the voting power or reduce the value of our common stock,” below. If we raise additional capital through collaboration, licensing or other similar arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish valuable rights to our products, potential products or proprietary technologies, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. If we cannot raise capital on acceptable terms, we may not be able to develop or enhance our products, execute our business plan, take advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, changes in our supplier relationships or unanticipated customer requirements. Any of these events could adversely affect our ability to achieve our business and financial goals or to achieve or maintain profitability, and could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our future financial results could be adversely affectedPPP loan may subject us to challenges and investigations regarding qualifications for the loan.
In April 2020, due to the economic uncertainty resulting from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operations and to support our ongoing operations and retain all employees, we applied for, and received, a loan under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) administered by impairments or other charges.the U.S.
We assess periodically impairment

33



Small Business Administration (SBA). The original principal amount of our long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets, whenever events or changesthe loan was $7.2 million; we subsequently repaid $1.0 million. In October 2020, we applied for forgiveness of the entire loan, which was granted in circumstances indicateJune 2021.The PPP loan application required us to certify that the carryingcurrent economic uncertainty made the loan request necessary to support our ongoing operations. We made this certification in good faith after carefully considering the facts and circumstances, and although we believe we satisfied all eligibility criteria for the PPP loan and our receipt of the PPP loan is consistent with the objectives of the PPP, the certification described above does not contain objective criteria and is subject to interpretation. Further, following the date we applied for the PPP Loan, the SBA issued updated guidance regarding the PPP, including regarding required borrower certifications and requirements for loan forgiveness. The SBA stated that it is unlikely that a public company with substantial market value may notand access to capital markets will be recoverable. Asable to make the required certification in good faith, and that all PPP loans in excess of December 31, 2017,$2 million will be subject to review by the SBA for compliance with program requirements. The lack of clarity regarding loan eligibility under the PPP resulted in significant media coverage and controversy regarding public companies applying for and receiving PPP loans. When we had $35.2 millionapplied for forgiveness of net finite-lived intangible assets, consisting of technologythe loan we were required to make certain certifications that will be subject to audit and customer relationships.review by governmental entities and could subject us to significant penalties and liabilities if found to be inaccurate. In addition, if despite our good faith belief that we continually assesssatisfied all eligibility requirements for the profitability of our product lines and, after such assessment, may discontinue certain productsPPP loan, we are found to have been ineligible to receive it or product lines in the future. As a result, we may record impairment charges or accelerate amortization on certain technology-related intangible assets in the future. Impairment charges as a resultviolation of any of the foregoing could be significant and could have a material and adverse effect on our reported financial results for the period in which the charge is taken, which could have a material and adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
We are required to maintain high levels of inventory, which could consume a significant amount of our resources and reduce our cash flows.
Because we maintain substantial inventory levels to meet the needs of our customers, we are subject to the risk of inventory excess, obsolescence and shelf-life expiration. Many of our spinal implant products come in sets. Each set includes a significant number of components in various sizes so that the surgeon may select the appropriate spinal implant based on the patient’s needs. In a typical surgery, not all of the implants in the set are used, and therefore certain sizes of implants placed in the set or that we purchase for replenishment inventory may become obsolete before they can be used. In addition, in order to market our products effectively, we often must provide hospitals and independent sales agents with consigned sets that typically consist of spinal implants and instruments, including products to ensure redundancy and products of different sizes. Further, our orthobiologics products have a sterilization expiration date, which ranges from one to five years, and these products may expire before they can

28




be used. If a substantial portion of our inventory is deemed excess, becomes obsolete or expires, it could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and cash flows due to the resulting costs associated with the inventory impairment charges and costs required to replace such inventory.
Certain of our historical financial information may not be representative of the results we would have achieved as an independent public company and may not be a reliable indicator of our future results.
For periods prior to our separation from Integra, financial information included in this Form 10-K may not necessarily reflect what our financial position, results of operations or cash flows would have been had we been an independent entity during the periods presented or those that we will achieve in the future. The costs and expenses reflected in these prior periods include an allocation for certain corporate functions historically provided by Integra, including shared services and infrastructure provided by Integra to us, such as costs for IT, including the costs of a multi-year global implementation of a enterprise resource planning system, accounting and legal services, real estate and facilities, corporate advertising, insurance services and related treasury, and other corporate and infrastructure services that may be different from the comparable expenses that we would have incurred had we operated as an independent public company. Financial data presented as of and for these periods does not reflect changes in our cost structure and operations as a result of operating as an independent public company, including changes in our employee base, increased costs associated with reduced economies of scale and increased costs associated with SEC reporting and requirements. Accordingly, financial data as of and for these periods should not be assumed to be indicative of what our financial condition or results of operations actually would have been as an independent public company or to be a reliable indicator of what our financial condition or results of operations actually could be in the future.
Continuing economic instability, including challenges faced by European countries, may adversely affect the ability of hospitals and other customers to access funds or otherwise have available liquidity, which could reduce orders for our products or impede our ability to obtain new customers, particularly in European markets.
Continuing economic instability, including challenges faced by European countries, may adversely affect the ability of hospitals and other customers to access funds to enable them to fund their operating budgets. As a result, hospitals and other customers may reduce budgets or put all or part of their budgets on hold or close their operations, which could have a negative effect on our sales and could impede our ability to obtain new customers, particularly in European markets. Governmental austerity policies in Europe and other markets have reduced and could continue to reduce the amount of money available to purchase medical products, including our products. If such conditions persist, they could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Relating to our Regulatory Environment
We are subject to stringent domestic and foreign medical device regulation and any adverse regulatory action may materially and adversely affect our financial condition and business operations.
Our products, development activities and manufacturing processes are subject to extensive and rigorous regulation by numerous federal and state government agencies, including the FDA and comparable foreign agencies. To varying degrees, each of these agencies monitors and enforces our compliance with laws and regulations governing the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, marketing and distribution of our products. For example, we are required to comply with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, which mandates that manufacturers of medical devices adhere to certain quality assurance standards pertaining to, among other things, validation of manufacturing processes, controls for purchasing product components and documentation practices.
In addition, we must engage in extensive recordkeeping and reporting. For example, the Federal Medical Device Reporting regulation requires us to provide information to the FDA whenever there is evidence that reasonably suggests that a device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or that a malfunction occurred that would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury upon recurrence.
Compliance with applicable regulatory requirements is subject to continual review and we must make our manufacturing facilities and records available for periodic unscheduled inspections by governmental agencies, including the FDA, state authorities and comparable agencies in other countries. If we fail to pass an FDA Quality System Regulation inspection or to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, we may receive a notice of a violation in the form of inspectional observations on Form FDA 483, a warning letter, or could otherwise be required to take corrective action and, in severe cases, we could suffer a disruption of our operations and manufacturing delays. If we fail to take adequate corrective actions, we could be subject to enforcement actions, including significant fines, suspension of approvals, seizures or recalls of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions.

29




The FDA has been increasing its scrutiny of the medical device industry and the government is expected to continue to scrutinize the industry closely. Moreover, allegations may be made against us or against our suppliers, including donor recovery groups or tissue banks, claiming that the acquisition or processing of biomaterials products does not comply with applicable FDA regulations or other relevant statutes and regulations. Allegations like these could cause regulators or other authorities to investigate or take other action against us or our suppliers, or could cause negative publicity for us or our industry generally. If the FDA were to investigate us, because of an allegation or otherwise, and if the FDA were to conclude that we are not in compliance with applicable laws or regulations or that any of our medical devices are ineffective or pose an unreasonable health risk,apply to us in connection with the FDA could ban such medical devices, detain or seize such medical devices, order a recall, repair, replacement or refund of such devices, require us to notify health professionals and others thatPPP loan, including the devices present unreasonable risks of substantial harm to the public health, restrict manufacturing and impose other operating restrictions, enjoin and restrain certain violations of applicable law pertaining to medical devices and assess civil or criminal penalties against our officers, employees or us. The FDA may also recommend prosecution to the U.S. Department of Justice. Any notice or communication from the FDA regarding a failure to comply with applicable requirements, or negative publicity or product liability claims resulting from any adverse regulatory action, could materially and adversely affect our product sales and overall business.
Further, our suppliers also are subject to a wide array of regulatory and other requirements, including quality control, quality assurance and the maintenance of records and documentation. Our suppliers may be unable to comply with these requirements and with other FDA, state and foreign regulatory requirements. We have little control over their ongoing compliance with these regulations. Their failure to comply may expose us to regulatory action and other liability, including fines and civil penalties, suspension of production, suspension or delay in new product approval or clearance, product seizure or recall, or withdrawal of product approval or clearance.
There is no guarantee that the FDA will grant 510(k) clearance or premarket approval, or that equivalent foreign regulatory authorities will grant the foreign equivalent, of our future products, and failure to obtain necessary clearances or approvals for our future products would adversely affect our ability to grow our business.
In general, unless an exemption applies, a medical device and modifications to the device or its indications must receive either premarket approval or premarket clearance from the FDA before it can be marketed in the U.S. While in the past we have received such clearances, we may not be successful in the future in receiving approvals and clearances in a timely manner, or at all. The process of obtaining approval or clearance from the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory agencies for new products, or for enhancements or modifications to existing products, could:
take a significant amount of time;
require the expenditure of substantial resources;
involve rigorous and expensive pre-clinical and clinical testing, as well as post-market surveillance;
involve modifications, repairs or replacements of our products; and
result in limitations on the indicated uses of our products.

Some of our new products will require FDA 510(k) clearance or approval of a premarket approval application, or PMA, prior to being marketed. Any modification to a 510(k)-cleared device that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, including significant design and manufacturing changes, or that would constitute a major change in its intended use, design or manufacture, requires a new 510(k) clearance or, possibly, approval of a PMA. Similarly, modifications to PMA-approved products may require submission and approval of a supplement PMA. The FDA requires every manufacturer to determine whether a new 510(k) or supplement PMA is needed in the first instance, and the FDA has issued guidance on assessing modifications to 510(k)-cleared and PMA-approved devices to assist manufacturers with making these determinations. However, the FDA may review any such determination and the FDA may not agree with our determinations regarding whether new clearances or approvals are necessary. We have modified some of our 510(k)-cleared products and have determined, based on our understanding of FDA guidance, that certain changes did not require new 510(k) clearances. If the FDA disagrees with our determination and requires us to seek new 510(k) clearances, or PMA approval, for modifications to our previously cleared products, we may be required to stop marketing or distributing our products, we may need to recall the modified product until we obtain clearance or approval, andFalse Claims Act, we may be subject to penalties, including significant regulatory finescivil, criminal and administrative penalties, and could have to repay the PPP loan upon demand. If we are audited or penalties. Significant delays in receiving clearance or approval,reviewed by the U.S. Department of the Treasury or the failureSBA, such audit or review could result in the diversion of management's time and attention, generate negative publicity and cause us to receive clearanceincur legal and reputational costs. In addition, our receipt of the PPP loan may result in adverse publicity and damage to our reputation. Any of these events could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Related to our International Operations
We are exposed to a variety of risks relating to our international sales and operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, approximately 10% of our net revenue was attributable to our international sales and operations.We are seeking to increase our international sales over the foreseeable future. Our international business operations are subject to a variety of risks, including:
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign and geographically dispersed operations;
having to comply with various U.S. and international laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 and anti-money laundering laws (see also, “Our international operations subject us to laws regarding sanctioned countries, entities and persons, customs and import-export practices, laws regarding transactions in foreign countries, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 and local anti-bribery and other laws regarding interactions with healthcare professionals, and product registration requirements” below);
having to comply with export control laws, including, but not limited to, the Export Administration Regulations and trade sanctions against embargoed countries, which are administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control within the Department of the Treasury, as well as the laws and regulations administered by the Department of Commerce;
complex data privacy requirements, including, but not limited to, the EU General Data Protection Regulation;
differing regulatory requirements for obtaining clearances or approval forapprovals to market our newproducts;
changes in, or uncertainties relating to, foreign rules and regulations that may impact our ability to sell our products, would have a materialperform services or repatriate profits to the United States;
tariffs, trade barriers and adverse effectexport regulations that adversely impact, and other regulatory and contractual limitations on, our ability to expandsell our business.products in certain foreign markets, the scope and consequences of which are subject to changing agendas of political, business and environmental groups;
Outside the U.S., clearancefluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;
limitations on or approval procedures can vary amongincrease of withholding and other taxes on remittances and other payments by foreign subsidiaries or joint ventures;
differing multiple payer reimbursement regimes, government payers or patient self-pay systems;
differing labor laws and standards;
economic, political or social instability in foreign countries and can involve additional product testingregions;
an inability, or reduced ability, to protect our intellectual property, including any effect of compulsory licensing imposed by government action; and validation and additional administrative review periods. The time required to obtain clearance or approval in other countries might differ from that required to obtain FDA clearance or approval. The regulatory process in other countries may include all of the risks to which we are exposed in the U.S., as well as other risks. Favorable regulatory action in one country does not ensure favorable regulatory action in another, but a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory clearance or approval in one country may have

30

34






availability of government subsidies or other incentives that benefit competitors in their local markets that are not available to us.
a negative effect on the regulatory processAny reduction in others. Failureinternational sales, or our failure to obtain clearance or approval in other countries or any delay or setback in obtaining such clearance or approval have a material and adverse effect onfurther develop our business, including that our products may not be cleared or approved for all indications requested, which could limit the uses of our products and have an adverse effect on product sales.
In the EEA, we must inform the Notified Body that carried out the conformity assessment of the medical devices we market or sell in the EEA of any planned substantial change to our quality system or any change to our devices that could affect compliance with the Essential Requirements laid down in Annex I to the Medical Devices Directive or the devices’ intended purpose. The Notified Body will then assess the change and verify whether it affects the products’ conformity with the Essential Requirements or the conditions for the use of the device. If the assessment is favorable, the Notified Body will issue a new CE Certificate of Conformity or an addendum to the existing CE Certificate of Conformity attesting compliance with the Essential Requirements. If it is not, we may not be able to continue to market and sell the applicable product in the EEA, whichinternational markets, could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We cannot be certain that we will receive required approval or clearance from the FDA and foreign regulatory agencies for new products, including modifications to existing products, on a timely basis, or at all. The failure to receive approval or clearance for new on a timely basis would have a material and adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Certain of our products are derived from human tissue and are or could be subject to additional regulations and requirements.
Some of our orthobiologics products are derived from human bone tissue, and as a result are also subject to FDA and certain state regulations regarding human cells, tissues and cellular or tissue-based products, or HCT/Ps. An HCT/P is a product containing or consisting of human cells or tissue intended for transplantation into a human patient. Examples include bone, ligament, skin and cornea.
Some HCT/Ps also meet the definition of a biological product, medical device or drug regulated under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act authorizes the FDA to issue regulations to prevent the introduction, transmission or spread of communicable disease. HCT/Ps regulated as “361 HCT/Ps” are subject to requirements relating to registering facilities and listing products with the FDA, screening and testing for tissue donor eligibility, Good Tissue Practice when processing, storing, labeling and distributing HCT/Ps, including required labeling information, stringent record keeping and adverse event reporting. These biologic, device or drug HCT/Ps must comply both with the requirements exclusively applicable to 361 HCT/Ps and, in addition, with requirements applicable to biologics, devices or drugs, including premarket clearance or approval. We have received required approvals for our products that are regulated as 361 HCT/Ps. However, there have been occasions in the past, and there could be occasions in the future, when the FDA requires us to obtain a 510(k) clearance for our products that are regulated as 361 HCT/Ps. The process of obtaining a 510(k) clearance could take time and consume resources, and the failure to receive such a clearance would render us unable to market and sell such products, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business.
The American Association of Tissue Banks has issued operating standards for tissue banking. Accreditation is voluntary, but compliance with these standards is a requirement in order to become a licensed tissue bank. In addition, some states have their own tissue banking regulations. In addition, procurement of certain human organs and tissue for transplantation is subject to the National Organ Transplant Act, or NOTA, which prohibits the transfer of certain human organs, including skin and related tissue, for valuable consideration, but permits the reasonable payment associated with the removal, transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control and storage of human tissue and skin. We reimburse tissue banks for their expenses associated with the recovery, storage and transportation of donated human tissue that they provide to us for processing. We include in our pricing structure amounts paid to tissue banks to reimburse them for their expenses associated with the recovery and transportation of the tissue, in addition to certain costs associated with processing, preservation, quality control and storage of the tissue, marketing and medical education expenses and costs associated with development of tissue processing technologies. NOTA payment allowances may be interpreted to limit the amount of costs and expenses that we can recover in our pricing for our products, thereby reducing our future revenue and profitability. If we were to be found to have violated NOTA’s prohibition on the sale or transfer of human tissue for valuable consideration, we would potentially be subject to criminal enforcement sanctions, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
Because of the absence of a harmonized regulatory framework and the proposed regulation for advanced therapy medicinal products in the European Union, or EU, as well as for other countries, the approval process in the EU for human-derived cell or tissue-based medical products could be extensive, lengthy, expensive and unpredictable. Among others, some of our orthobiologics products are subject to EU member states’ regulations that govern the donation, procurement, testing, coding, traceability, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of HCT/Ps. These EU member states’ regulations include requirements for

31




registration, listing, labeling, adverse-event reporting and inspection and enforcement. Some EU member states have their own tissue banking regulations. Non-compliance with various regulations governing our products in any EU member state could result in the banning of our products in such member state or enforcement actions being brought against us, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Certain of our products contain materials derived from animal sources and may become subject to additional regulation.
Certain of our products contain material derived from bovine tissue. Products that contain materials derived from animal sources, including food, pharmaceuticals and medical devices, are subject to scrutiny in the media and by regulatory authorities. Regulatory authorities are concerned about the potential for the transmission of disease from animals to humans via those materials. This public scrutiny has been particularly acute in Japan and Western Europe with respect to products derived from animal sources, largely due to concern that materials infected with the agent that causes bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or BSE, otherwise known as mad cow disease, may, if ingested or implanted, cause a variant of the human Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, an ultimately fatal disease with no known cure. Cases of BSE in cattle discovered in Canada and the U.S. have increased awareness of the issue in North America.
We take steps designed to minimize the risk that our products contain agents that can cause disease, such as obtaining our collagen from countries considered to be BSE-free. Nevertheless, products that contain materials derived from animals, including our products, could become subject to additional regulation, or even be banned in certain countries, because of concern over the potential for the transmission of infectious or other agents. Significant new regulation, or a ban of our products, could have a material and adverse effect on our current business or our ability to expand our business.
Certain countries, such as Japan, China, Taiwan and Argentina, have already issued regulations that require our collagen products be processed from bovine tendon sourced from countries where no cases of BSE have occurred. The collagen raw material we use in our products is sourced from New Zealand. Our supplier has obtained approval from certain countries, including the U.S., the European Union, Japan, Taiwan, China and Argentina, for the use of such collagen raw material in products sold in those countries. If we cannot continue to obtain collagen raw material from a qualified source of tendon from a country that has never had a case of BSE, we will not be permitted to sell our collagen products in certain countries, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Clinical studies are expensive and subject to extensive regulation and their results may not support our product candidate claims or may result in the discovery of adverse effects.
In the development of new products or new indications for, or modifications to, existing products, we may conduct or sponsor pre-clinical testing, clinical studies or other clinical research. We are currently conducting post-market clinical studies of some of our products to gather information about their performance or optimal use. The data collected from these clinical studies may ultimately be used to support additional market clearance or approval for these products or future products. If any of our new products require premarket clinical studies, these studies are expensive, the outcomes are inherently uncertain and they are subject to extensive regulation and review by numerous governmental authorities both in the U.S. and abroad, including by the FDA and, if federal funds are involved or if an investigator or site has signed a federal assurance, are subject to further regulation by the Office for Human Research Protections and the National Institutes of Health. For example, clinical studies must be conducted in compliance with FDA regulations, local regulations, and according to principles and standards collectively referred to as “Good Clinical Practices.” Failure to comply with applicable regulations could result in regulatory and legal enforcement action, including fines, penalties, suspension of studies, and also could invalidate the data and make it unusable to support a FDA submission.
Even if any of our future premarket clinical studies are completed as planned, we cannot be certain that their results will support our product candidates and/or proposed claims or that the FDA or foreign authorities and Notified Bodies will agree with our interpretation and conclusions regarding the data they generate. Success in pre-clinical studies and early clinical studies does not ensure that later clinical studies will be successful, and we cannot be sure that the results of later studies will replicate those of earlier or prior studies. The clinical study process may fail to demonstrate that our product candidates are safe and effective for the proposed indicated uses, which could cause us to abandon a product candidate and may delay development of others. Any delay or termination of our clinical studies will delay the filing of our product submissions and, ultimately, our ability to commercialize our product candidates and generate revenues. It is also possible that patient subjects enrolled in our clinical studies of our marketed products will experience adverse side effects that are not currently part of the product candidate’s profile and, if so, these findings may result in lower market acceptance, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

32




If the third parties on which we rely to conduct our clinical studies and to assist us with pre-clinical development do not perform as contractually required or expected, we may not be able to obtain regulatory clearance, approval or a CE Certificate of Conformity for or commercialize our products.
We often must rely on third parties, such as contract research organizations, medical institutions, clinical investigators and contract laboratories, to assist in conducting our clinical studies and other development activities. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, comply with applicable regulatory obligations or meet expected deadlines, or if these third parties need to be replaced, or if the quality or accuracy of the data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to clinical protocols, to applicable regulatory requirements or otherwise, our pre-clinical development activities and clinical studies may be extended, delayed, suspended or terminated. Under these circumstances, we may not be able to obtain regulatory clearance/approval or a CE Certificate of Conformity for, or successfully commercialize, our products on a timely basis, if at all, and our business, operating results and prospects may be materially and adversely affected.
Oversight of the medical device industry might affect the way we sell medical devices and compete in the marketplace.
The FDA, the U.S. Office of the Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the U.S. Department of Justice and other regulatory agencies actively enforce regulations prohibiting the promotion of a medical device for a use that has not been cleared or approved by the FDA. Use of a device outside its cleared or approved indications is known as “off-label” use. Physicians may prescribe our products for off-label uses, as the FDA does not restrict or regulate a physician’s choice of treatment within the practice of medicine. However, if a regulatory agency determines that our promotional materials, training or activities constitute improper promotion of an off-label use, the regulatory agency could request that we modify our promotional materials, training or activities, or subject us to regulatory enforcement actions, including the issuance of a warning letter, injunction, seizure, civil fine and/or criminal penalties. Although our policy is to refrain from statements and activities that could be considered off-label promotion of our products, any regulatory agency could disagree and conclude that we have engaged in off-label promotion and, potentially, caused the submission of false claims. In addition, the off-label use of our products may increase the risk of injury to patients, and, in turn, the risk of product liability claims. See “Risks Relating to our Business-We may have significant product liability exposure and our insurance may not cover all potential claims,” above.
There are also multiple other laws and regulations that govern the means by which companies in the healthcare industry may market their products to healthcare professionals and may compete by discounting the prices of their products, including, for example, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal False Claims Act, the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, state law equivalents to these federal laws that are meant to protect against fraud and abuse, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 and analogous laws in foreign countries. Violations of these laws are punishable by criminal and civil sanctions, including, but not limited to, penalties, fines and exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, and imprisonment. Federal and state government agencies, as well as private whistleblowers, have significantly increased investigations and enforcement activity under these laws. Although we exercise care in structuring our sales and marketing practices, customer discount arrangements and interactions with healthcare professionals to comply with these laws and regulations, we cannot provide assurance that government officials will not assert that our practices are in compliance or that government regulators or courts will interpret those laws or regulations in a manner consistent with our interpretation. Even if an investigation is not successful or is not fully pursued, we may spend considerable time and resources defending ourselves and the adverse publicity surrounding any assertion that we may have engaged in violative conduct could have a material and adverse effect on our reputation with existing and potential customers and on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Federal and state laws are also sometimes open to interpretation, and from time to time we may find ourselves at a competitive disadvantage if our interpretation differs from that of our competitors. AdvaMed (U.S.), EucoMed (Europe), MEDEC (Canada) and MTAA (Australia), some of the principal trade associations for the medical device industry, have promulgated model codes of ethics that set forth standards by which its members should (and non-member companies may) abide in the promotion of their products in various regions. We have implemented policies and procedures for compliance consistent with those promulgated by these associations, and we train our sales and marketing personnel on our policies regarding sales and marketing practices. Nevertheless, the sales and marketing practices of our industry have been the subject of increased scrutiny from federal and state government agencies, we believe this trend will continue and that it could affect our ability to retain customers and other relationships important to our business.
For example, prosecutorial scrutiny and governmental oversight, at both the state and federal levels, over some major device companies regarding the retention of healthcare professionals have limited the manner in which medical device companies may retain healthcare professionals as consultants. Various hospital organizations, medical societies and trade associations are establishing their own practices that may require detailed disclosures of relationships between healthcare professionals and medical

33




device companies or ban or restrict certain marketing and sales practices, such as gifts and business meals. In addition, the Affordable Care Act, as well as certain state laws, require detailed disclosure of certain financial relationships, gifts and other remuneration made to certain healthcare professionals and teaching hospitals, the publicity surrounding which could have a negative impact on our relationships with our customers and ability to seek input on product design or involvement in research. As a result of laws, rules and regulations or our own or third-party policies that prohibit or restrict interactions, or the growing perception that any interaction between healthcare professionals and industry are tainted, we may be unable to engage with our healthcare professional customers in the same manner or to the same degree, or at all, as would otherwise be the case, which may adversely affect our ability to understand our customer’s needs and to incorporate into our development programs feedback that addresses these needs. If we are unable to develop and commercialize new products that address the needs of our surgeon customers and their patients, our products may not be broadly accepted in the marketplace, or at all, which would have a negative effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Unfavorable media reports or other negative publicity concerning both alleged improper methods of tissue recovery from donors and disease transmission from donated tissue could limit widespread acceptance of some of our products.
Unfavorable reports of improper or illegal tissue recovery practices, both in the U.S. and internationally, as well as incidents of improperly processed tissue leading to the transmission of disease, may affect the rate of future tissue donation and market acceptance of technologies incorporating human tissue. In addition, negative publicity could cause the families of potential donors to become reluctant to agree to donate tissue to for-profit tissue processors. For example, the media has reported examples of alleged illegal harvesting of body parts from cadavers and resulting recalls conducted by certain companies selling human tissue based products affected by the alleged illegal harvesting. These reports and others could have a negative effect on our tissue regeneration business.
Our international operations subject us to laws regarding sanctioned countries, entities and persons, customs and import-export practices, laws regarding transactions in foreign countries, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 and local anti-bribery and other laws regarding interactions with healthcare professionals, and product registration requirements.
Foreign governmental regulations have become increasingly stringent and more common, and we may become subject to even more rigorous regulation by foreign governmental authorities in the future.authorities. Numerous laws restrict, and in some cases prohibit, U.S. companies from directly or indirectly selling goods, technology or services to people or entities in certain countries. In addition, these laws require that we exercise care in structuring our sales and marketing practices and effecting product registrations in foreign countries. Compliance with these regulations is costly.

The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, or FCPA, and similar anti-bribery laws in non-U.S. jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. The FCPA also imposes accounting standards and requirements on publicly traded U.S. corporations and their foreign affiliates, which are intended to prevent the diversion of corporate funds to the payment of bribes and other improper payments. Because of the predominance of government-sponsored healthcare systems around the world, many of our customer relationships outside of the United States are with governmental entities and are therefore subject to such anti-bribery laws. Our internal control policies and procedures may not always protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by our employee shareowners, or agents. In recent years, both the United States and foreign government regulators have increased regulation, enforcement, inspections and governmental investigations of the medical device industry, including increased United States government oversight and enforcement of the FCPA. Despite implementation of a comprehensive global healthcare compliance program, we may be subject to more regulation, enforcement, inspections and investigations by governmental authorities in the future.
Any failure to comply with applicable foreign legal and regulatory obligations could adversely affect us in a variety of ways, that include, but are not limited to: the suspension or withdrawal of our CE Certificates of Conformity; the imposition of significant criminal, civil and administrative fines and penalties, including revocation or suspension of a business license and imprisonment of individuals; denial of export privileges; seizure of shipments and restrictions on certain business activities; disgorgement and other remedial measures; disruptions of our operations; and significant management distraction.

Our results may be impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Regulations related to “conflict minerals” may force us toAs a result of our international sales and operations, we generate revenues in various foreign currencies including euros, British pounds, and Swiss francs, and in U.S. dollar-denominated transactions conducted with customers who generate revenue in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We also incur additionaloperating expenses may makein euros. We cannot predict accurately the consolidated effects of exchange rate fluctuations upon our supply chain more
complexfuture operating results because of the variability of currency exposure in our revenues and may result in damage to our reputation with customers.

We areoperating expenses and the potential volatility of currency exchange rates, which is subject to SEC regulations that require usincreased volatility in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although we address currency risk management through regular operating and financing activities, those actions may not prove to determine whetherbe fully effective. In addition, for those foreign customers who purchase our products contain certain specified minerals,referredin U.S. dollars, currency exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the currencies in which those customers do business may have a negative effect on the demand for our products in foreign countries where the U.S. dollar has increased in value compared to under the regulations as “conflict minerals,”local currency. Converting our earnings from international operations to U.S. dollars for use in the U.S. can also raise challenges, including problems moving funds out of the countries in which the funds were earned and difficulties in collecting accounts receivable in foreign countries where the usual accounts receivable payment cycle is longer. To date, we have not used risk management techniques to hedge the risks associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Even if we implemented hedging strategies, not every exposure can be hedged and, where hedges are put in place based on expected foreign currency exchange exposure, they are based on forecasts that may vary or that may later prove to have been inaccurate. As a result, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates or our failure to successfully hedge against these fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

35



Risks Related to Privacy and Security
We depend on information technology and if so,our information technology fails to perform an extensive inquiry into our supply chain,operate adequately or fails to determine whether such conflict minerals originate fromproperly maintain the Democratic Republic of Congo or an adjoining country. We have determined

34




that certainintegrity of our products contain such specified minerals. data, our business could be materially and adversely affected.
We are continuingdepend significantly on sophisticated information technology, or IT, for our infrastructure and to conduct inquiries into our supply chain in connectionsupport business decisions. Our IT needs require an ongoing commitment of significant resources to maintain, protect and enhance existing systems and to develop new systems to keep pace with new technology, evolving regulatory standards, the preparationincreasing need to protect patient and customer information and changing customer patterns. We do not have a comprehensive IT disaster recovery plan. Any significant breakdown, intrusion, interruption, corruption or destruction of any component of our conflict minerals report for 2018. Compliance with these regulations has increased our costsIT systems could have a material and has been time-consuming for our management and our supply chain personnel (as well as time-consuming for our suppliers), and we expect that continued compliance will continue to require significant amounts of money and time. In addition, to the extent any of our disclosures are perceived by the market to be “negative,” it may cause customers to refuse to purchase our products. Further, if we determine to make any changes to products, processes, or sources of supply, it may result in additional costs, which may adversely affectadverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Security breaches, loss of data and other disruptions could compromise sensitive information related to our business, prevent us from accessing critical information or expose us to liability, which could adversely affect our business and our reputation.
In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including legally protected patient health information, credit card information, personally identifiable information about our employees, intellectual property, and proprietary business information. We manage and maintain our applications and data utilizing on-site systems. These applications and data encompass a wide variety of business critical information including research and development information, commercial information and business and financial information.
Although our computer and information systems are protected through physical and software safeguards, they are still vulnerable to system malfunction, computer viruses, cyber-attacks, breaches or interruptions due to employee error or malfeasance, terrorist attacks, earthquakes, fire, flood (and other natural disasters), power loss, computer systems failure, data network failure, Internet failure, or lapses in compliance with privacy and security mandates. If any of our systems were to become subject to any of the foregoing, our networks could be compromised, and the information stored there could be accessed by unauthorized parties, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. These events could lead to the unauthorized access and result in the misappropriation or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information belonging to us or to our employees, partners, customers or suppliers. We have measures in place designed to detect and respond to security incidents and breaches of privacy and security mandates. The techniques used by criminal elements to attack computer systems are sophisticated, change frequently and may originate from less regulated and remote areas of the world. As a result, we may not be able to address these techniques proactively or implement adequate preventative measures.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have modified our business practices and implemented telework policies wherever possible for appropriate categories of "nonessential" employees to minimize the disruption to our operations, to the extent possible. The continuation of these telework policies for "nonessential employees" also introduces additional operational risk, including increased cybersecurity risk. These cyber risks may include, among other risks, greater phishing, malware, and other cyber-attacks, vulnerability to or disruptions of our information technology infrastructure and systems to support remote operations, increased risk of unauthorized access, use or dissemination of confidential information, limited ability to restore the systems in the event of a systems failure or interruption, greater risk of a security breach resulting in destruction, alteration or misuse of valuable information, including proprietary business information and personally identifiable information of individuals, all of which could expose us to risks of data or financial loss, litigation and liability.
The regulatory environment governing information, security and privacy laws is increasingly demanding and continues to evolve. A number of states have adopted laws and regulations that may affect our privacy and data security practices regarding the use, disclosure and protection of personally identifiable information. For example, the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which applies to any company established in the EU as well as any company outside the EU that processes personal data in connection with the offering of goods or services to individuals in the EU, imposes strict obligations on the processing of personal data, including personal health data, and the free movement of such data. The GDPR imposes substantial fines for breaches of data protection requirements, which can be up to four percent of global revenue or 20 million euros, whichever is greater, and it also confers a private right of action on data subjects for breaches of data protection requirements. We are also subject to the California Consumer Privacy Act (the CCPA), which went into effect on January 1, 2020. On November 3, 2020, California passed the California Privacy Rights Act (the CPRA), which builds on the CCPA and expands consumer privacy rights to more closely align with the EU’s GDPR. The CPRA will go into effect on January 1, 2023 and will apply to information collected on or after January 1, 2022. The CCPA and CPRA, among other things, create new data privacy obligations for covered companies and provides new privacy rights to California residents, including the right to opt out of

36



certain disclosures of their information. The CCPA also created a private right of action with statutory damages for certain data breaches, thereby potentially increasing risks associated with a data breach. It remains unclear what, if any, additional modifications will be made to the CPRA by the California legislature or how it will be interpreted. Therefore the effects of the CCPA and CPRA are significant and will likely require us to modify our data processing practices, and may cause us to incur substantial costs and expenses to comply.
If our IT systems are compromised, due to a data breach or otherwise, we could be subject to legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information (such as the CCPA, GDPR and CPRA) government enforcement actions and regulatory penalties, fines, damages, and enforcement actions, and we could lose trade secrets or other confidential information, the occurrence of any of which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Unauthorized access, loss or dissemination could also interrupt our operations, including our ability to bill our customers, provide customer support services, conduct research and development activities, process and prepare company financial information, manage various general and administrative aspects of our business, and could damage our reputation, any of which could adversely affect our business.
Risks Related to Non-Compliance with Laws and Regulations
We are subject to stringent domestic and foreign medical device regulation and any adverse regulatory action may materially and adversely affect our financial condition and business operations.
Our products, development activities and manufacturing processes are subject to extensive and rigorous regulation by numerous federal and state government agencies, including the FDA and comparable foreign agencies. To varying degrees, each agency monitors and enforces our compliance with laws and regulations governing the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, marketing and distribution of our products. For example, we must comply with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, which mandates that manufacturers of medical devices adhere to certain quality assurance standards pertaining to, among other things, validation of manufacturing processes, controls for purchasing product components and documentation practices.
In addition, we must engage in extensive recordkeeping and reporting. For example, the Federal Medical Device Reporting regulation requires us to provide information to the FDA whenever there is evidence that reasonably suggests that a device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or that a malfunction occurred that would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury upon recurrence.
Compliance with applicable regulatory requirements is subject to continual review and we must make our manufacturing facilities and records available for periodic unscheduled inspections by governmental agencies, including the FDA, state authorities and comparable agencies in other countries. If we fail to pass an FDA Quality System Regulation inspection or to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, we may receive a notice of a violation in the form of inspectional observations on Form FDA 483, a warning letter, or could otherwise be required to take corrective action and, in severe cases, we could suffer a disruption of our operations and manufacturing delays. If we fail to take adequate corrective actions, we could be subject to enforcement actions, including significant fines, suspension of approvals, seizures or recalls of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions.
The FDA has increased its scrutiny of the medical device industry in recent years and the government is expected to continue to scrutinize the industry closely. Moreover, allegations may be made against us or against our suppliers, including donor recovery groups or tissue banks, claiming that the acquisition or processing of biomaterials products does not comply with applicable FDA regulations or other relevant statutes and regulations. Allegations like these could cause regulators or other authorities to investigate or take other action against us or our suppliers, or could cause negative publicity for us or our industry generally. If the FDA were to investigate us, because of an allegation or otherwise, and if the FDA were to conclude that we are not in compliance with applicable laws or regulations, or that any of our medical devices are ineffective or pose an unreasonable health risk, the FDA could ban such medical devices, detain or seize such medical devices, order a recall, repair, replacement or refund of such devices, require us to notify health professionals and others that the devices present unreasonable risks of substantial harm to the public health, restrict manufacturing and impose other operating restrictions, enjoin and restrain certain violations of applicable law pertaining to medical devices and assess civil or criminal penalties against our officers, employees or us. The FDA may also recommend prosecution to the U.S. Department of Justice. Any notice or communication from the FDA regarding a failure to comply with applicable requirements, or negative publicity or product liability claims resulting from any adverse regulatory action, could materially and adversely affect our product sales and overall business.
The European Union adopted the MDR in 2017, which will replace the existing medical device directives in May 2021.

37



Devices with valid CE certificates issued under the directive before May 2021 may remain on the market until their certificates expire (but no later than May 2024). The MDR will change many aspects of the existing regulatory framework, imposing stricter pre-market and post-market requirements for medical devices such as ours. Penalties may be severe, including fines and criminal sanctions. Compliance with the new regulations may require us to incur significant costs, and failure to meet the requirements could limit our ability to distribute products in the European Union. In addition, until a completed mutual recognition agreement exists between Switzerland and the EU, Switzerland will be considered a Third Country. This may lead to additional import/export requirements or unavailability of product in Switzerland if that product is made available in the EU under the MDR.
Further, our suppliers also are subject to a wide array of regulatory and other requirements, including quality control, quality assurance, the maintenance of records and documentation, and unscheduled inspections by governmental agencies, including the FDA, state authorities and comparable agencies in other countries. Our suppliers may be unable to comply with these requirements and with other FDA, state and foreign regulatory requirements. We have little control over their ongoing compliance with these regulations. Their failure to comply may expose us to regulatory action and other liability, including fines and civil penalties, suspension of production, suspension or delay in new product approval or clearance, product seizure or recall, or withdrawal of product approval or clearance.
Certain of our products are derived from human tissue and are or could be subject to additional regulations and requirements.
Some of our orthobiologics products are derived from human bone tissue, and as a result are also subject to FDA and certain state regulations regarding human cells, tissues and cellular or tissue-based products, or HCT/Ps. An HCT/P is a product containing or consisting of human cells or tissue intended for transplantation into a human patient. Examples include bone, ligament, skin and cornea.
Some HCT/Ps also meet the definition of a biological product, medical device or drug regulated under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act authorizes the FDA to issue regulations to prevent the introduction, transmission or spread of communicable disease. HCT/Ps regulated as “361 HCT/Ps” are subject to requirements relating to registering facilities and listing products with the FDA, screening and testing for tissue donor eligibility, Good Tissue Practice when processing, storing, labeling and distributing HCT/Ps, including required labeling information, stringent record keeping and adverse event reporting. These biologic, device or drug HCT/Ps must comply both with the requirements exclusively applicable to 361 HCT/Ps and, in addition, with requirements applicable to biologics, devices or drugs, including premarket clearance or approval. We have received required approvals for our products regulated as 361 HCT/Ps. However, there have been occasions in the past, and there could be occasions in the future, when the FDA requires us to obtain a 510(k) clearance for our products regulated as 361 HCT/Ps. The process of obtaining a 510(k) clearance could take time and consume resources, and failing to receive such a clearance would render us unable to market and sell such products, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business.
The American Association of Tissue Banks has issued operating standards for tissue banking. Accreditation is voluntary, but compliance with these standards is a requirement to become a licensed tissue bank. In addition, some states have their own tissue banking regulations. In addition, procurement of certain human organs and tissue for transplantation is subject to the National Organ Transplant Act, or NOTA, which prohibits the transfer of certain human organs, including skin and related tissue, for valuable consideration, but permits the reasonable payment associated with the removal, transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control and storage of human tissue and skin. We reimburse tissue banks for their expenses associated with the recovery, storage and transportation of donated human tissue they provide to us for processing. We include in our pricing structure amounts paid to tissue banks to reimburse them for their expenses associated with the recovery and transportation of the tissue, in addition to certain costs associated with processing, preservation, quality control and storage of the tissue, marketing and medical education expenses and costs associated with development of tissue processing technologies. NOTA payment allowances may be interpreted to limit the amount of costs and expenses we can recover in our pricing for our products, thereby reducing our future revenue and profitability. If we were to be found to have violated NOTA’s prohibition on the sale or transfer of human tissue for valuable consideration, we would potentially be subject to criminal enforcement sanctions, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
Because of the absence of a harmonized regulatory framework and the proposed regulation for advanced therapy medicinal products in the European Union, or EU, as well as for other countries, the approval process in the EU for human-derived cell or tissue-based medical products could be extensive, lengthy, expensive and unpredictable. Among others, some of our orthobiologics products are subject to EU member states’ regulations that govern the donation, procurement, testing,

38



coding, traceability, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of HCT/Ps. These EU member states’ regulations include requirements for registration, listing, labeling, adverse-event reporting and inspection and enforcement. Some EU member states have their own tissue banking regulations, including new requirements related to COVID-19 and donor screening. Non-compliance with various regulations governing our products in any EU member state could result in the banning of our products in such member state or enforcement actions being brought against us, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Certain of our products contain materials derived from animal sources and may become subject to additional regulation.
Certain of our products contain material derived from bovine tissue. Products that contain materials derived from animal sources, including food, pharmaceuticals and medical devices, are subject to scrutiny in the media and by regulatory authorities. Regulatory authorities are concerned about the potential for the transmission of disease from animals to humans via those materials. In past years, public scrutiny was particularly acute in Western Europe with respect to products derived from animal sources, largely due to concern that materials infected with the agent that causes bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or BSE, otherwise known as mad cow disease, may, if ingested or implanted, cause a variant of the human Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, an ultimately fatal disease with no known cure. Cases of BSE in cattle discovered in Canada and the U.S. increased awareness in North America.
We take steps designed to minimize the risk that our products contain agents that can cause disease, such as obtaining our collagen from countries considered BSE-free. Nevertheless, products that contain materials derived from animals, including our products, could become subject to additional regulation, or even be banned in certain countries, because of concern over the potential for the transmission of infectious or other agents. Significant new regulation, or a ban of our products, could have a material and adverse effect on our business or our ability to expand our business.
Certain countries, such as Japan, China, Taiwan and Argentina, have issued regulations that require our collagen products be processed from bovine tendon sourced from countries where no cases of BSE have occurred. The collagen raw material we use in our products is sourced from New Zealand. Our supplier has obtained approval from certain countries, including the U.S., the European Union, Japan, Taiwan, China and Argentina, for the use of such collagen raw material in products sold in those countries. If we cannot continue to obtain collagen raw material from a qualified source of tendon from a country that has never had a case of BSE, we will not be permitted to sell our collagen products in certain countries, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Oversight of the medical device industry might affect the way we sell medical devices and compete in the marketplace.
The FDA, the U.S. Office of the Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the U.S. Department of Justice and other regulatory agencies actively enforce regulations prohibiting the promotion of a medical device for a use that has not been cleared or approved by the FDA. Use of a device outside its cleared or approved indications is known as “off-label” use. Physicians may prescribe our products for off-label uses, as the FDA does not restrict or regulate a physician’s choice of treatment within the practice of medicine. However, if a regulatory agency determines that our promotional materials, training or activities constitute improper promotion of an off-label use, the regulatory agency could request that we modify our promotional materials, training or activities, or subject us to regulatory enforcement actions, including the issuance of a warning letter, injunction, seizure, civil fine and/or criminal penalties. Although our policy is to refrain from statements and activities that could be considered off-label promotion of our products, any regulatory agency could disagree and conclude that we have engaged in off-label promotion and, potentially, caused the submission of false claims. In addition, the off-label use of our products may increase the risk of injury to patients, and, in turn, the risk of product liability claims. See “Other Risks Related to our Business and Financial Condition-We may have significant product liability exposure and our insurance may not cover all potential claims,” below.
There are also multiple other laws and regulations that govern how companies in the healthcare industry may market their products to healthcare professionals and may compete by discounting the prices of their products, including, for example, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal False Claims Act, the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, state law equivalents to these federal laws that are meant to protect against fraud and abuse, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 and analogous laws in foreign countries. Violations of these laws are punishable by criminal and civil sanctions, including, but not limited to, penalties, fines and exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, and imprisonment. Federal and state government agencies, as well as private whistleblowers, have significantly increased investigations and enforcement activity under these laws. Although we exercise care in structuring our sales and marketing practices, customer discount arrangements and interactions with healthcare professionals to comply

39



with these laws and regulations, we cannot provide assurance that government officials will not assert that our practices are in compliance or that government regulators or courts will interpret those laws or regulations in a manner consistent with our interpretation. Even if an investigation is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, we may spend considerable time and resources defending ourselves and the adverse publicity surrounding any assertion that we may have engaged in violative conduct could have a material and adverse effect on our reputation with existing and potential customers and on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Federal and state laws are also sometimes open to interpretation, and from time to time we may find ourselves at a competitive disadvantage if our interpretation differs from that of our competitors. AdvaMed (U.S.), EucoMed (Europe), MEDEC (Canada) and MTAA (Australia), some of the principal trade associations for the medical device industry, have promulgated model codes of ethics that set forth standards by which its members should (and non-member companies may) abide in the promotion of their products in various regions. We have implemented policies and procedures for compliance consistent with those promulgated by these associations, and we train our sales and marketing personnel on our policies regarding sales and marketing practices. Nevertheless, the sales and marketing practices of our industry have been the subject of increased scrutiny from federal and state government agencies, we believe this trend will continue and that it could affect our ability to retain customers and other relationships important to our business.
For example, prosecutorial scrutiny and governmental oversight, at both the state and federal levels, over some major device companies regarding the retention of healthcare professionals have limited how medical device companies may retain healthcare professionals as consultants. Various hospital organizations, medical societies and trade associations are establishing their own practices that may require detailed disclosures of relationships between healthcare professionals and medical device companies or ban or restrict certain marketing and sales practices, such as gifts and business meals. In addition, the Affordable Care Act, as well as certain state laws, require detailed disclosure of certain financial relationships, gifts and other remuneration made to certain healthcare professionals and teaching hospitals, the publicity surrounding which could have a negative impact on our relationships with our customers and ability to seek input on product design or involvement in research. As a result of laws, rules and regulations or our own or third-party policies that prohibit or restrict interactions, or the growing perception that any interaction between healthcare professionals and industry are tainted, we may be unable to engage with our healthcare professional customers in the same manner or to the same degree, or at all, as would otherwise be the case, which may adversely affect our ability to understand our customer’s needs and to incorporate into our development programs feedback that addresses these needs. If we are unable to develop and commercialize new products that address the needs of our surgeon customers and their patients, our products may not be broadly accepted in the marketplace, or at all, which would have a negative effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are subject to requirements relating to hazardous materials which may impose significant compliance or other costs on us.
Our research, development and manufacturing processes involve the controlled use of certain hazardous materials. For example, our allograft bone tissue processing may generate waste materials that in the U.S. are classified as medical waste. In addition, we lease facilities at which hazardous materials could have been used in the past. As a resultused. Because of the foregoing, we are subject to federal, state, foreign and local laws and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling, treatment, remediation and disposal of hazardous materials and certain waste products.
Although we believe that our procedures for handling and disposing of hazardous materials comply with applicable laws as currently in effect, we cannot completely eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials. In addition, under some environmental laws and regulations, we could also be held responsible for all of the costs relating to any contamination at our past or present facilities and at third-party waste disposal sites, even if such contamination was not caused by us. In the event ofIf an accident occurs, state or federal or other applicable authorities may curtail our use of these materials and interrupt our business operations. In addition, if an accident or environmental discharge occurs, or if we discover contamination caused by prior operations, including by prior owners and operators of properties we acquire, we could be liable for cleanup obligations, damages and fines any related liability could exceed our resources. If such unexpected costs are substantial, this could significantly harm our financial condition and results of operations. We currently carry no insurance specifically covering environmental claims relating to the use of hazardous materials.

40



Risks RelatingRelated to our Intellectual Property Protection and Use
Our intellectual property rights may not provide meaningful commercial protection for our products, potentially enabling third parties to use our technology or very similar technology in ways that could reduce our ability to compete in the marketplace.
Our success will depend in part on our ability to, both in the U.S. and in foreign countries, obtain and maintain patent and other exclusivity with respect to our products; prevent third parties from infringing upon our proprietary rights; and maintain proprietary know-how and trade secrets. However, these legal means afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep any competitive advantage.
We own or have licensed patents that cover aspects of some of our product lines. Our patents, however, may not provide us with any significant competitive advantage. Others may challenge our patents and, as a result, our patents could be narrowed, invalidated or rendered unenforceable. Competitors may develop products similar to ours that our patents do not cover. In addition, our current and future patent applications may not result in the issuance of patents in the U.S. or foreign countries. Further, there is a substantial backlog of patent applications at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and the approval or rejection of patent applications may take several years.
In an effort to protect our trade secrets and intellectual property rights, we require our employees, consultants and advisors to execute confidentiality and invention assignment agreements upon commencement of employment or consulting relationships with us. These agreements provide that, except in specified circumstances, all confidential information developed or made known to the individual during their relationship with us must be kept confidential. We cannot assure you, however, that these agreements will provide meaningful protection formeaningfully protect our trade secrets or other proprietary information in the event of the unauthorized use or disclosure of confidential information. In addition, we cannot assure you that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and procedures or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets, that our trade secrets will not be disclosed or that we can otherwise protect our rights to unpatented trade secrets.
In addition to contractual measures, we try to protect the confidential nature of our proprietary information using
physical and technological security measures. Such measures may not, for example, in the case of misappropriation of a trade
secret by an employee or third party with authorized access, provide adequate protection foradequately protect our proprietary information. Our
security measures may not prevent an employee or consultant from misappropriating our trade secrets and providing them to a
competitor, and recourse we take against such misconduct may not provide an adequate remedy to protect our interests fully.

35




Unauthorized parties may also attempt to copy or reverse engineer certain aspects of our products that we consider proprietary.
Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret can be difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable.

In addition, we may face claims by third parties that our agreements with employees, consultants or advisors obligating them to assign intellectual property to us are ineffective or in conflict with prior or competing contractual obligations of assignment, which could result in ownership disputes regarding intellectual property we have developed or will develop and interfere with our ability to capture the commercial value of such intellectual property. Litigation may be necessary to resolve an ownership dispute, and if we are not successful,unsuccessful, we may be precluded from using certain intellectual property or may lose our exclusive rights in that intellectual property. Either outcome could harm our business and competitive position. See “If we seek to protect or enforce our intellectual property rights through litigation or other proceedings, it could require us to spend significant time and money, the results of which are uncertain,” below.
Furthermore, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S., if at all. Since most of our issued patents and pending patent applications are for the U.S. only, we lack a corresponding scope of patent protection in other countries. Thus, we may not be able to stop a competitor from marketing products in other countries that are similar to some of our products.
If we are unable to obtain, protect and enforce patents on our technology and to protect our trade secrets, such inability could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

41



Our success will depend partly on our ability to operate without infringing or misappropriating the proprietary rights of others.
Our success will depend in part on our ability, both in the U.S. and in foreign countries, to operate without infringing upon the patents and proprietary rights of others, and to obtain appropriate licenses to patents or proprietary rights held by third parties if infringement would otherwise occur.
Significant litigation regarding patent rights occurs in our industry. Our competitors in both the U.S. and abroad, many of which have substantially greater resources and have made substantial investments in patent portfolios and competing technologies, may have applied for or obtained or may in the future apply for and obtain, patents that will prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with our ability to make, use and sell our products. Generally, we do not conduct independent reviews of patents issued to third parties. In addition, patent applications in the U.S. and elsewhere can be pending for many years before issuance, so there may be applications of others now pending of which we are unaware that may later result in issued patents that will prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with our ability to make, use or sell our products. The large number of patents, the rapid rate of new patent applications and issuances, the complexities of the technology involved, and the uncertainty of litigation increase the risk of assets and resources including management’s attention, being diverted to patent litigation. We have received, in the past, and expect to receive, in the future, communications from various industry participants alleging our infringement of their patents, trade secrets or other intellectual property rights and/or offering licenses to such intellectual property. Any lawsuits resulting from such allegations could subject us to significant liability for damages and invalidate our proprietary rights. Any potential intellectual property litigation also could force us to do one or more of the following:
stop making, selling or using products or technologies that allegedly infringe the asserted intellectual property;
lose the opportunity to license our technology to others or to collect royalty payments based upon successful protection and assertion of our intellectual property rights against others;
incur significant legal expenses;
pay substantial damages or royalties to the party whose intellectual property rights we may be found to be infringing;
pay the attorney fees and costs of litigation to the party whose intellectual property rights we may be found to be infringing;
redesign those products that contain the allegedly infringing intellectual property, which could be costly, disruptive and/or infeasible; or
attempt to obtain a license to the relevant intellectual property from third parties, which may not be available on reasonable terms or at all.

See “If we seek to protect or enforce our intellectual property rights through litigation or other proceedings, it could require us to spend significant time and money, the results of which are uncertain,” below.

Further, as the number of participants in the spine industry grows, the possibility of intellectual property infringement claims against us increases. If we are found to infringe the intellectual property rights of third parties, we could be requiredhave to pay substantial damages (which may be increased up to three times of awarded damages) and/or substantial royalties and could be prevented from

36




selling our products unless we obtain a license or are able to redesign our products to avoid infringement. Any such license may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all, and there can be no assurance that we would be able to redesign our products in a way that would not infringe the intellectual property rights of others. If we fail to obtain any required licenses or make any necessary changes to our products or technologies, we may have to withdraw existing products from the market or may be unable to commercialize one or more of our products, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, we generally indemnify our customers and sales agents with respect to infringement by our products of the proprietary rights of third parties. Third parties may assert infringement claims against our customers or sales agents. These claims may require us to initiate or defend protracted and costly litigation on behalf of our customers or sales agents, regardless of the merits of these claims. If any of these claims succeed, we may be forced to indemnify, or pay damages on behalf of, our customers or sales agents or may be requiredhave to obtain licenses for the products they use. If we cannot obtain all necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms, our customers may be forced to stop using our products.

42



If we seek to protect or enforce our intellectual property rights through litigation or other proceedings, it could require us to spend significant time and money, the results of which are uncertain.
To protect or enforce our intellectual property rights, we may have to initiate or defend litigation against or by third parties, such as infringement suits, opposition proceedings or seeking a court declaration that we do not infringe the proprietary rights of others or that their rights are invalid or unenforceable. Litigation, including defending against claims without merit is expensive and time-consuming, and could divert management attention and resources away from our business and could harm our reputation. We may not have sufficient resources to enforce our intellectual property rights or to defend our intellectual property rights against a challenge. Even if we prevail, the cost of litigation, including the diversion of management and other resources, could affect our profitability and could place a significant strain on our financial resources.
Our ability to enforce our intellectual property rights depends on our ability to detect infringement. It may be difficult to detect infringers who do not advertise the components that are used in their products. Moreover, it may be difficult or impossible to obtain evidence of infringement in a competitor’s or potential competitor’s product. The medical device industry is characterized by the existence of a large number of patents and frequent litigation based on allegations of patent infringement. It is not unusual for parties to exchange letters surrounding allegations of intellectual property infringement and licensing arrangements. In addition, the patent positions of medical device companies, including our patent position, may involve complex legal and factual questions, and, therefore, the scope, validity and enforceability of any patent claims that we have or may obtain cannot be predicted with certainty.
Risks RelatingRelated to Our Public Company Status and Growth Through Acquisition
The acquisition of 7D Surgical may present many risks and we may not realize the strategic and financial goals that were contemplated at the time we entered into the arrangement agreement to acquire 7D Surgical in March 2021.
We acquired 7D Surgical in May 2021. Certain risks we may face in connection with the integration of 7D Surgical include:

We may not realize the benefits we expect to receive from the acquisition, such as a best-in-class enabling technology that provides surgeons a radiation-free navigational system that integrates seamlessly into the surgical workflow; gaining access to new accounts and/or increasing our presence in existing accounts by providing access to the 7D Surgical technology and/or placing systems at little or no upfront cost to the hospital through product earn-outs; expanding applications for the 7D Surgical offering, such as in minimally invasive procedures; and the ability of the 7D Surgical technology to position us to address the full patient continuum of care, from pre-operative imaging and surgical planning to post-operative plan confirmation and predictive analytics.
The acquisition may not further our business strategy as we expect, we may not successfully integrate 7D Surgical as planned, there could be unanticipated adverse impacts on our or 7D Surgical’s business, and/or we may otherwise not realize the expected return on our investment, which could potentially cause impairment to assets that we record as a part of the acquisition, including intangible assets and goodwill.
Our operating results or financial condition may be adversely impacted by (i) claims or liabilities related to 7D Surgical’s business arising after closing; (ii) unfavorable accounting treatment as a result of 7D Surgical’s practices; and/or (iii) intellectual property claims or disputes.
7D Surgical was not required to maintain an internal control infrastructure that would meet the standards of a U.S. public company, including the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The costs that we may incur to implement such controls and procedures may be substantial and we could encounter unexpected delays and challenges in this implementation. In addition, we may discover significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the quality of 7D Surgical’s financial and disclosure controls and procedures.
We may have failed to identify or assess the magnitude of certain liabilities, shortcomings or other circumstances prior to acquiring 7D Surgical, which could result in unexpected litigation or regulatory exposure, unfavorable accounting treatment, a diversion of management’s attention and resources, and other adverse effects on our business, financial condition, and operating results.


43



The occurrence of any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.
We expend substantial resources to comply with laws and regulations relating to public companies, and any failure to maintain compliance could subject us to regulatory scrutiny and cause investors to lose confidence in our company, which could harm our business and have a material adverse effect on our stock price.
Laws and regulations affecting public companies, including provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), and the related rules and regulations adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and by the Nasdaq Stock Market increase our accounting, legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming and costly. We cannot predict or estimate with any reasonable accuracy the total amount or timing of the costs we may incur to comply with these laws and regulations. In addition, we expect that our management and other personnel will need to divert attention from operational and other business matters to devote substantial time to these matters. For example, compliance with Section 404 of SOX, including performing the system and process documentation and evaluation necessary to issue our annual report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and obtaining the required attestation report from our independent registered public accounting firm, requires us to incur substantial expense and expend significant management time. Further, we have in the past discovered, and in the future may discover, areas of internal controls that need improvement. If we identify deficiencies in our internal controls deemed to be material weaknesses, we could become subject to scrutiny by regulatory authorities and we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our SEC filings, including the financial statements included therein, which could have a material adverse effect on our stock price. Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error and circumvention by collusion or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even an effective internal control system may not prevent or detect material misstatements on a timely basis, or at all. Also, previously effective controls may become inadequate over time because of changes in our business or operating structure, and we may fail to take measures to evaluate the adequacy of and update these controls, as necessary, which could lead to a material misstatement.
In addition, new laws and regulations could make it costlier or more difficult for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the coverage that is the same or similar to our current coverage. The impact of these events could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve as our executive officers or on our board of directors or on its committees.
Regulations related to “conflict minerals” may force us to incur additional expenses, may make our supply chain more complex and may result in damage to our reputation with customers.
We are subject to SEC regulations that require us to determine whether our products contain certain specified minerals, referred to under the regulations as “conflict minerals,” and, if so, to perform an extensive inquiry into our supply chain, to determine whether such conflict minerals originate from the Democratic Republic of Congo or an adjoining country. We have determined that certain of our products contain such specified minerals. We are continuing to conduct inquiries into our supply chain in connection with the preparation of our conflict minerals report for 2020. Compliance with these regulations has increased our costs and has been time-consuming for our management and our supply chain personnel (and time-consuming for our suppliers), and we expect that continued compliance will continue to require significant money and time. In addition, to the extent any of our disclosures are perceived by the market to be “negative,” it may cause customers to refuse to purchase our products. Further, if we determine to make any changes to products, processes, or sources of supply, it may result in additional costs, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our growth strategy could involve growth through acquisitions, which would require us to incur substantial costs and potential liabilities for which we may never realize the anticipated benefits.
We may grow our business through acquisitions, a strategy which ultimately could prove unsuccessful. Any new acquisition could result in material transaction expenses, increased interest and amortization expense, increased depreciation expense, increased operating expense and possible in-process research and development charges for acquisitions that do not meet the definition of a “business,” any of which could have a material and adverse effect on our operating results.
In addition, businesses we acquire may not have adequate financial, disclosure, regulatory, quality or other compliance controls in place when we acquire them, which may create uncertainty regarding the actual condition and financial results of the

44



acquired business and our assumptions regarding synergies and future results. Following any acquisition, we must integrate the new business, which includes incorporating it into our financial, compliance, regulatory and quality systems. Failure to timely and successfully integrate acquired businesses may result in non-compliance with regulatory or other requirements and may result in unexpected costs, including as a result of inadequate cost containment and unrealized economies of scale. In addition, acquisitions divert management and other resources, and involve other risks, including, risks associated with entering markets in which our marketing and sales personnel may have limited experience and with disruption to existing relationships with employees, suppliers, customers and sales agents, both with respect to us and the acquired company. As a result of any of the foregoing, we may not realize the expected benefit from any acquisition. If we cannot integrate acquired businesses, products or technologies, our business, financial conditions and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Furthermore, as a result of acquisitions of other healthcare businesses, we may be subject to the risk of unanticipated business uncertainties, regulatory and other compliance matters or legal liabilities relating to those acquired businesses for which the sellers of the acquired businesses may not indemnify us, for which we may not be able to obtain insurance (or adequate insurance) or for which the indemnification may not be sufficient to cover the ultimate liabilities.
Risks Related to Owning our Common Stock
The market price of our common stock has been and likely will continue to be volatile.
The market price of our common stock is likely to be volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. In addition to the factors discussed in this “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Form 10-K, these factors include:
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial condition and operating performance;
introduction of new products by us or our competitors;
announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions or dispositions;
our ability to obtain financing as needed;
a shift in our investor base, including sales of our shares by existing stockholders;
any major change in our board of directors or management;
threatened or actual litigation or governmental investigations;
the number of shares of our common stock publicly owned and available for trading;
the operating and stock price performance of similar companies;
changes in earnings estimates by securities analysts or our ability to meet earnings guidance;
publication of research reports about us or our industry or changes in recommendations or withdrawal of research coverage by securities analysts;
changes in laws or regulations affecting our business, including tax legislation;
the success or failure of our business strategy;
investor perception of us and our industry;
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles;

37




the overall performance of the equity markets;
general political and economic conditions, and other external factors.

In addition, the stock market in general, and the stocks of medical device companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. This could limit or prevent investors from readily selling their shares and may otherwise negatively affect the liquidity of our common stock. Securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the overall market and in the market price of a company’s securities. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in very substantial costs, divert our management’s attention and resources, and harm our business, financial condition and results of operation.

45



Your percentage of ownership in us may be diluted in the future and issuances of substantial amounts of our common stock, or the perception that such issuances may occur, could cause the market price of our common stock to decline significantly, even if our business is performing well.
As with any public company, your percentage ownership in us may be diluted in the future because of equity issuances for acquisitions and investments, capital-raising transactions or otherwise, including equity awards that we have granted and we expect to grant in the future to our directors, officers and employees. As of December 31, 2017,2021, approximately 0.70.8 million shares of our common stock were subject to unvested restricted stock units and approximately 1.72.6 million shares of our common stock were subject to exercisable stock options with a weighted average exercise price of $14.55. In August 2016,
Since July 1, 2015, we entered intohave issued an equity distribution agreement with Piper Jaffray & Co. (Piper Jaffray), pursuant to which we may offer and sellaggregate of 22.1 million shares of our common stock in “at the market” (ATM) offerings (as defined in Rule 415 of the Act) havingfor capital-raising purposes. Most recently, we issued an aggregate offering price up to $25.0 million in gross proceeds from time to time through Piper Jaffray acting as sales agent. The shares offered and sold under the distribution agreement are covered by a registration statement on Form S-3 that was declared effective in August 2016. As of December 31, 2017, we had the capacity to issue additional5,175,000 shares of our common stock (including 675,000 shares sold to generate upthe underwriter upon exercise of an underwriter option) in an underwritten offering completed in April 2021 at price to $8.8 millionthe public of gross proceeds under$19.50 per share, before underwriting discounts and commissions. In May 2021, in connection with our acquisition of 7D Surgical, we issued to the distribution agreement. Subsequent to December 31, 2017, we sold 882,332former stockholders of 7D Surgical, 2,991,054 shares of our common stock at an average price per shareand 1,298,648 exchangeable shares, which are exchangeable for shares of $10.00 and received net proceeds of approximately $8.6 million, which consumed the remaining capacity under the distribution agreement. our common stock on a one-for-one basis.
Further, the market price of our common stock could decline as a result of the issuance, including sale, of a large number of shares of our common stock, under the distribution agreement or otherwise, and the perception that these sales could occur may also depress the market price of our common stock. A decline in the price of our common stock might impede our ability to raise capital through the issuance of additional shares of our common stock or other equity securities.
We are an “emerging growth company” and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.
We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we are taking advantage of certain exemptions and relief from various reporting requirements that are applicable to public companies that are not emerging growth companies. In particular, while we are an emerging growth company: (i) we will not be required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of SOX; (ii) we will be exempt from any rules that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board requiring mandatory audit firm rotations or a supplement to the auditor’s report on financial statements; (iii) we will be subject to reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements; and (iv) we will not be required to hold nonbinding advisory votes on executive compensation or stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.
In addition, as an emerging growth company we are not required to comply with any new or revised accounting standard applicable to public companies until such date that a private company is required to comply with such standard. We elected not to comply with such new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies, therefore our financial statements may not be comparable to the financial statements of public companies that are not emerging growth companies.
We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of: (i) December 31, 2020 (the fiscal year-end following the fifth anniversary of the completion of the spin-off); (ii) the end of the fiscal year in which the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700.0 million as of the last business day of the second fiscal quarter of that year; (iii) the end of the fiscal year in which our annual revenues exceed $1.0 billion; and (iv) the date on which we issue more than $1.0 billion in nonconvertible debt in any three-year period.
Investors may find our common stock less attractive because we rely on the exemptions available to, and relief granted to, emerging growth companies by the JOBS Act, which may result in a less active trading market for our common stock and our

38




stock price may decline and/or become more volatile.
If, once we are no longer an emerging growth company, our independent registered public accounting firm cannot provide an unqualified attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, investor confidence and, in turn, the market price of our common stock, could decline.equity-linked securities.
We may issue preferred stock with terms that could dilute the voting power or reduce the value of our common stock.
While we have no specific plan to issue preferred stock, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes us to issue, without stockholder approval, one or more series of preferred stock having such designation, powers, privileges, preferences, including preferences over our common stock respecting dividends and distributions, terms of redemption and relative participation, optional, or other rights, if any, of the shares of each such series of preferred stock and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as our board of directors may determine. The terms of one or more series of preferred stock could dilute the voting power or reduce the value of our common stock. For example, the repurchase or redemption rights or liquidation preferences we could assign to holders of preferred stock could affect the residual value of the common stock.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If current or future analysts who cover us were to downgrade our stock or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts were to stop covering us or were to stop regularly publishing reports on us, demand for our stock could decrease, which might cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.
We do not anticipate paying cash dividends, and accordingly, stockholders must rely on stock appreciation for any return on their investment.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not currently expect to declare or pay any such cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Instead, we currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business. Payment of cash dividends, if any, will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and other factors and will be at the discretion of our board of directors. Furthermore, we are subject to various laws and regulations that may restrict our ability to pay dividends and are subject to contractual restrictions on, or prohibitions against, the payment of dividends. Due to the foregoing, the return on your investment in our common stock will likely depend entirely upon any future appreciation and our common stock may not appreciate. Investors seeking cash dividends should not invest in our common stock.
Certain provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law could discourage takeover attempts and lead to management entrenchment and, therefore, may depress the market price of our common stock.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that could have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control or changes in our management without the consent of our board of

46



directors, including, among other things:
a classified board of directors with three-year staggered terms, which may delay the ability of stockholders to change the membership of a majority of our board of directors;
no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect director candidates;
the ability of our board of directors to determine to issue shares of preferred stock and to determine the price and other terms of those shares, including preferences and voting rights, without stockholder approval, which could be used to significantly dilute the ownership of a hostile acquirer;
the exclusive right of our board of directors to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of our board of directors or by the resignation, death or removal of a director, which prevents stockholders from being able to fillfilling vacancies on our board of directors;
limitations on the removal of directors;
a prohibition on stockholder action by written consent, which forces stockholder action to be taken at an annual or special meeting of our stockholders;
the requirement that a special meeting of stockholders be called only by the chairman of our board of directors,

39




our chief executive officer, our president (in absence of a chief executive officer) or our board of directors, which may delay the ability of our stockholders to force consideration of a proposal or to take action, including the removal of directors;
advance notice procedures that stockholders must comply with to nominate candidates to our board of directors or to propose matters to be acted upon at a stockholders’ meeting, which may discourage or deter a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirer’s own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us;
the requirement for the affirmative vote of holders of at least 66 2⁄3% of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares of our voting stock, voting together as a single class, to amend or repeal the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation relating to the issuanceand of preferred stock and management of our business or our amended and restated bylaws that relate to the matters described above, which may inhibit the ability of an acquirer from amending our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or amended and restated bylaws to facilitate a hostile acquisition; and
the ability of our board of directors, by majority vote, to amend our amended and restated bylaws, which may allow our board of directors to take additional actions to prevent a hostile acquisition and inhibit the ability of an acquirer from amending our amended and restated bylaws to facilitate a hostile acquisition; and
advance notice procedures that stockholders must comply with in order to nominate candidates to our board of directors or to propose matters to be acted upon at a stockholders’ meeting, which may discourage or deter a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirer’s own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.

acquisition.
We believe that these provisions protect our stockholders from coercive or harmful takeover tactics by requiring potential acquirers to negotiate with our board of directors and by providing our board of directors with adequate time to assess any acquisition proposal.
We are also subject to certain anti-takeover provisions under the DGCL. Under the DGCL, a corporation may not, in general, engage in a business combination with any holder of 15% or more of its capital stock unless the holder has held the stock for three years or, among other things, our board of directors has approved the transaction.
The provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and the anti-takeover provisions under the DGCL, may discourage, delay, prevent or make it more difficult for stockholders or potential acquirers to obtain control of our board of directors or initiate actions that are opposed by our then-current board of directors, including a merger, tender offer, or proxy contest involving our company. Any delay or prevention of a change of control transaction or changes in our board of directors could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. Even in the absence ofabsent a takeover attempt, the existence of these provisions may adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock if they are viewed as discouraging future takeover attempts.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation designates the Court of Chancery of the State of Delawarecertain courts as the sole and exclusive forum for certain litigation that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law: (A) the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if the Court of Chancery does not have, or declines to accept, jurisdiction, another state court or a federal court located within the

47



State of Delaware) shall be the sole and exclusive forum for:for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf;behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by, or other wrongdoing by, any of our directors, officers or other employees to us or our stockholders;stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against us or any of our directors, officers or employees arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or bylaws, (iv) any action to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of our amended and restated bylaws;certificate of incorporation or (iv)bylaws, or (v) any action asserting a claim against us or any of our directors, officers or employees governed by the internal affairs doctrine.doctrine; and (B) the federal district courts of the United States shall be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation further provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in sharesany of our capital stocksecurities shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the provisions described above. These provisions may limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us.

We are subject to certain disclosure and compliance requirements that did not previously apply to us due to the recent change in our filer status and ceasing to qualify as a smaller reporting company.

Our public float as of June 30, 2021 exceeded $250.0 million but was less than $700.0 million. As a result, we became an accelerated filer and no longer qualify as a smaller reporting company. As a result of such changes, we are subject to certain disclosure and compliance requirements that did not previously apply to us, including accelerated deadlines for filing are periodic reports. Compliance with such requirements will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and may require our management and other personnel to devote more time to public company reporting requirements. In addition, if we are not able to comply with such requirements in a timely or complete manner, the market price of our stock could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the stock exchange on which our common stock is listed, the SEC, or other regulatory authorities, which would divert additional financial and management resources away from our business.
Other Risks Related to our Business and Financial Condition
Our business could suffer if we lose the services of key members of our senior management or fail to hire and retain other personnel on whom our business relies.
Our ability to execute our business strategy and compete in the highly competitive medical device industry depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified personnel. Companies in the medical device industry in general have experienced a high rate of personnel turnover. Loss of key employees, including any of our scientific, technical and managerial personnel, could adversely affect our ability to successfully execute our business strategy, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We would be adversely affected if we fail to adequately prepare for future turnover of our senior management team. Moreover, replacing key employees may be a difficult, costly and protracted process, and we may not have other personnel with the capacity to assume all of the responsibilities of a departing employee. Competition for qualified personnel, particularly for key positions, is intense among companies in our industry, particularly in the San Diego, California area, and many of the organizations against which we compete for qualified personnel have greater financial and other resources and different risk profiles than our company, which may make them more attractive employers. All of our employees, including our management personnel, may terminate their employment with us at any time without notice. If we cannot attract and retain highly qualified personnel, as needed, we may not achieve our financial and other goals.
Moreover, future internal growth could impose significant added responsibilities on our management, and we will need to identify, recruit, maintain, motivate and integrate additional employees to manage growth effectively. If we do not effectively manage such growth, our expenses may increase more than expected, we may not achieve our goals, and our ability to generate and/or grow revenue could be diminished.
We may have significant product liability exposure and our insurance may not cover all potential claims.
We are exposed to product liability and other claims. Spine surgery involves significant risk of serious complications, including bleeding, nerve injury, paralysis and even death. In addition, if neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons are not sufficiently trained in the use of our products, they may misuse or ineffectively use our products, which may result in unsatisfactory patient outcomes or patient injury. We could become the subject of product liability lawsuits alleging that component failures, malfunctions, manufacturing flaws, design defects, or inadequate disclosure of product-related risks or product-related information resulted in an unsafe condition or injury to patients. In addition, the development of allograft

48



implants and technologies for human tissue repair and treatment may entail particular risk of transmitting diseases to human recipients, and any such transmission could result in the assertion of product liability claims against us.
Product liability claims are expensive to defend, divert our management’s attention and, if we are not successful in defending the claim, can result in substantial monetary awards against us or costly settlements. Further, successful product liability claims made against one or more of our competitors could cause claims to be made against us or expose us to a perception that we are vulnerable to similar claims. Any product liability claim brought against us, with or without merit and regardless of the outcome or whether it is fully pursued, may result in: decreased demand for our products; injury to our reputation; significant litigation costs; product recalls; loss of revenue; the inability to commercialize new products or product candidates; and adverse publicity regarding our products. Any of these may have a material and adverse effect on our reputation with existing and potential customers and on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our existing product liability insurance coverage may be inadequate to protect us from any liabilities we might incur. If a product liability claim or series of claims is brought against us for uninsured liabilities or more than our insurance coverage, our business could suffer. In addition, a recall of some of our products, whether or not the result of a product liability claim, could result in significant costs and loss of customers.
Our insurance policies are expensive and protect us only from some risks, which will leave us exposed to significant uninsured liabilities.
We do not carry insurance for all categories of risk to which our business is or may be exposed. Some of the policies we maintain include general liability, foreign liability, employee benefits liability, property, umbrella, employment practices, workers’ compensation, products liability, cyber, and directors’ and officers’ insurance.We do not know, however, if we will be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in sufficient amounts or scope to protect us against losses. Even if we obtain insurance, a claim could exceed the amount of our insurance coverage or it may be excluded from coverage under the terms of the policy. Further, insurance coverage may not be available or successfully secured for loss profits or business interruption relating to the COVID-19 pandemic and its impacts. Any significant uninsured liability may require us to pay substantial amounts, which would adversely affect our cash position and results of operations.
We may be subject to claims that we, our employees, or our independent sales agents or stocking distributors have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of our competitors or are in breach of non-competition or non-solicitation agreements with our competitors.
Many of our employees were employed at other medical device companies, including our competitors or potential competitors, in some cases immediately prior to joining us. In addition, many of our independent sales agents and stocking distributors sell, or in the past have sold, products of our competitors. We may be subject to claims that we, our employees or our independent sales agents or stocking distributors have intentionally, inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of former employers or competitors. In addition, we have been and may in the future be subject to claims that we caused an employee, or encouraged/assisted an independent sales agent, to breach the terms of his or her non-competition or non-solicitation agreement. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Litigation is expensive, time-consuming and could divert management attention and resources away from our business. Even if we prevail, the cost of litigation could affect our profitability. If we do not prevail, in addition to any damages we might have to pay, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or employees, independent sales agents or stocking distributors. There can be no assurance that this type of litigation or the threat thereof will not adversely affect our ability to engage and retain key employees, sales agents or stocking distributors. See also the risk factors titled, “Risks Related to Manufacturing, Commercial Operations and Commercialization - If we are unable to maintain and expand our network of independent sales agents and stocking distributors, we may not be able to maintain or grow our revenue,” and “Our business could suffer if we lose the services of key members of our senior management or fail to hire and retain other personnel on whom our business relies” above.
We have overlapping board membership with Integra, which may lead to conflicting interests, and one of our directors continues to own a substantial amount of Integra common stock and equity awards covering Integra stock.
Two of our board members also serve as board members of Integra. Our directors who are members of Integra’s board of directors have fiduciary duties to Integra’s stockholders, as well as fiduciary duties to our stockholders. In addition, several of our directors own or have rights to acquire Integra common stock (in at least one case, a substantial amount).

49



As a result of the foregoing, there may be the appearance of a conflict of interest and there is the potential for a conflict of interest with respect to matters involving or affecting both companies, such as when we or Integra consider acquisitions and other corporate opportunities that may be suitable for each company. In addition, potential conflicts of interest could arise in connection with the resolution of any dispute that may arise between Integra and us regarding the terms of the agreements governing our separation from Integra, the Tax Matters Agreement or under other agreements between Integra and us, including with respect to indemnification matters. From time to time, we may enter into transactions with Integra and/or its subsidiaries or other affiliates. There can be no assurance that the terms of any such transactions will be as favorable to us, Integra or any of our or their subsidiaries or affiliates as would be the case were there no overlapping board membership or ownership interest.
We may be subject to continuing contingent liabilities of Integra.
Even after our separation from Integra, there are several significant areas where Integra’s liabilities may become our obligations. For example, under the Code and the related rules and regulations, each corporation that was a member of the Integra consolidated U.S. federal income tax reporting group during any taxable period or portion of any taxable period ending on or before the effective time of the distribution is jointly and severally liable for the U.S. federal income tax liability of the entire Integra consolidated tax reporting group for that taxable period. In addition, the Tax Matters Agreement allocates the responsibility for prior period taxes of the Integra consolidated tax reporting group between us and Integra. Under this allocation, we may be responsible for taxes that we would not have otherwise incurred, or that we would have incurred but in different amounts and/or at different times, on a standalone basis outside of the Integra consolidated group, and the amount of such taxes could be significant. If Integra is unable to pay any prior period taxes for which it is responsible, we could have to pay the entire amount of such taxes.
General Risk Factors
Changes in financial accounting standards or practices or existing taxation rules or practices may cause adverse unexpected revenue and/or expense fluctuations and affect our reported results of operations.
A change in accounting standards or practices or a change in existing taxation rules or practices can have a significant effect on our reported results and may even affect our reporting of transactions completed before the change is effective. New accounting pronouncements and taxation rules and varying interpretations of accounting pronouncements and taxation practice have occurred and may occur in the future. The method in which we market and sell our products may have an impact on the manner in which we recognize revenue. In addition, changes to existing rules or the questioning of current practices may adversely affect our reported financial results or the way we conduct our business. Additionally, changes to existing accounting rules or standards, such as the potential requirement that U.S. registrants prepare financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, may adversely impact our reported financial results and business, and may further require us to incur greater accounting fees.
Environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) regulations, policies and provisions may make our supply chain more complexand may adversely affect our relationships with customers.
There is an increasing focus on the governance of environmental and social risks. A number of our customers who are payors or distributors have adopted, or may adopt, procurement policies that include ESG provisions that their suppliers or manufacturers must comply with, or they may seek to include such provisions in their terms and conditions. An increasing number of participants in the medical device industry are also joining voluntary ESG groups or organizations, such as the Responsible Business Alliance. These ESG provisions and initiatives are subject to change, can be unpredictable, and may be difficult and expensive for us to comply with, given the complexity of our supply chain and the outsourced manufacturing of certain components of our products. If we are unable to comply, or are unable to cause our suppliers to comply, with such policies or provisions, a customer may stop purchasing products from us, and may take legal action against us, which could harm our reputation, revenue and results of operations.
Our business could be negatively impacted by corporate citizenship and ESG matters and/or our reporting of such matters.
There is an increasing focus from certain investors, customers, consumers, and other stakeholders concerning corporate citizenship and sustainability matters. We could be perceived as not acting responsibly in connection with these matters. Our business could be negatively impacted by such matters. Any such matters, or related corporate citizenship and sustainability matters, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

50



ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
As of the filing of this report, we had no unresolved comments from the SEC staff regarding our periodic or current reports under the Exchange Act that were received not less than 180 days before the end of our fiscal year to which this report relates.


51
40






ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our principal executive officesWe lease real property to support our business. The following lists those leased properties that we believe are located in Carlsbad, California, from whichmaterial to our orthobiologics and spinal implant products are designed, developed, and marketed, and from which recently launched spinal implant products are inspected, kitted and distributed. We transferred the inspection, kitting, warehousing and distribution functions for our older, legacy spinal implant products to an
outsourced third party in Olive Branch , Mississippi in the fourth quarter of 2016. Our Carlsbad facility is an 82,000-square foot leased facility, where we also maintain our cadaveric training laboratory and our prototyping development and testing operation. The term of this lease expires in 2027. We also lease a 70,000-square foot manufacturing and distribution facility located in Irvine, California, from which most of our orthobiologics products are manufactured and all are distributed. The term of this lease expires in 2023. We also lease a 4,000-square foot office in Wayne, Pennsylvania, where we design spinal implants and which facilitates our interactions with customers on the East Coast. We also lease a 2,600-square foot office in Lyon, France to facilitate our international sales and marketing.business. We believe that our facilities are sufficient to meet our current needs and that we will be availableable to renew these leases when needed on acceptable terms.terms or find alternative facilities.

LocationApprox. Square FeetPurpose
Carlsbad, California82,000Design, development, marketing, and inspection of our orthobiologics and spinal implant products and distribution of certain of our spinal implant products. Also serves as our principal executive offices and houses one of our cadaveric training laboratories and our prototyping development and testing operations.
Irvine, California70,000Manufacture and distribution of our orthobiologics products
Toronto, Canada9,200Design, development, marketing of our enabling technologies products
Wayne, Pennsylvania3,700Design of our spinal implants and houses one of our cadaveric training laboratories
Our manufacturing facilities are registered with the FDA. Our facilities are subject to FDA inspection to ensure compliance with its Quality System Regulations. For further information regarding the status of FDA inspections, see the "Item 1. Business- Regulation," above.



41

52






ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we are subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. While management presently believes that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not materially harm our financial position, cash flows, or overall trends in results of operations, in part because of the insurance policies we maintain that cover certain of these claims, legal proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties, and unfavorable rulings or outcomes could occur that have individually or in aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results. We are not currently subject to any pending material litigation, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business, as described above.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information Holders and DividendsHolders
Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “SPNE.” As of March 7, 2022, we had 355 stockholders of record. The following table listsnumber of stockholders of record is based upon the high and low sales prices fornumber of holders registered on our books at such date. A substantially greater number of holders of our common stock for each full quarterly period within our two most recent fiscal years:are “street name” or beneficial holders, whose shares are held by banks, brokers and other financial institutions.
  2017 2016
  High Low High Low
Fourth Quarter 11.44 9.80 10.75 6.80
Third Quarter 13.41 10.06 12.14 9.40
Second Quarter 11.52 7.54 14.93 9.49
First Quarter 8.08 6.63 16.71 12.06
Dividend Policy
We have notnever declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock sincecapital stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to finance the operation of our formation. Our credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association restricts our abilitybusiness, and we do not expect to declare or pay any cash dividend or make any other cash payment or distribution, directly or indirectly, todividends in the holders of our common stock in their capacity as such. Any future determinations to pay cash dividends on the common stock will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors.
As of February 26, 2018, we had 346 stockholders of record.

foreseeable future.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Information about our equity compensation plan is incorporated herein by reference to Part III, Item 12 of this report.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the fourth quarter of 2017,2021, we did not issue any securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act).



42


Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer
The table below is a summary of our purchases of our common stock for the months with purchase activitieswe made during the quarter ended December 31, 2017.2021. Other than as indicated in the table below, no such purchases were made in any other month during the quarter. We do not have any publicly announced repurchase plans or programs.
Period Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)
 Average Price Paid per Share
 Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
 Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
PeriodTotal Number of Shares Purchased (1)Average Price Paid per ShareTotal Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or ProgramsMaximum Number of Shares That May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
        
October 1 - October 31October 1 - October 314,334 $15.82 — — 
November 1 - November 30November 1 - November 301,550 $15.76 — — 
December 1 - December 31 219
 $10.00
 
 
December 1 - December 311,103 $13.11 — — 
(1(1))These shares were surrendered to the Company to satisfy tax withholdings obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock awards.


53
43




ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATAREMOVED AND RESERVED


The following table summarizes certain selected financial data derived from our audited financial statements. The information presented should be read in conjunction with “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our audited financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. For periods prior to the spin-off, the consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of the orthobiologics and spinal implants business of Integra. Subsequent to the spin-off, the Company’s financial statements are presented on a consolidated basis, as the Company became a separate publicly-traded company on July 1, 2015. As a result, the consolidated financial results and balance sheet data for certain of the periods presented below may not be directly comparable.
  Year Ended December 31,
   2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
  (In thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:           
Total revenue, net  $131,814
 $128,860
 $133,178
 $138,695
 $146,586
Cost of goods sold  51,826
 55,544
 61,119
 56,714
 55,532
Gross profit 79,988
 73,316
 72,059
 81,981
 91,054
Operating expenses:           
Selling, general and administrative  97,303
 101,065
 110,551
 88,213
 93,009
Research and development  12,180
 11,442
 8,353
 8,527
 9,893
Intangible amortization  3,168
  4,309
 5,331
 5,590
 5,598
Total operating expenses  112,651
  116,816
 124,235
 102,330
 108,500
Operating loss  (32,663)  (43,500) (52,176) (20,349) (17,446)
Other (income) expense, net  (430)  264
 877
 269
 4,556
Loss before income taxes  (32,233) (43,764) (53,053) (20,618) (22,002)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes (118) (552) 2,479
 3,927
 3,744
Net loss $(32,115) $(43,212) $(55,532) $(24,545) $(25,746)
Net loss per share (basic and diluted) $(2.58) $(3.85) $(4.99) $(2.22) $(2.23)

  As of December 31,
  2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
  (In thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:           
Working capital $53,261
  $58,242
 $87,687
 $28,664
 $37,857
Total assets 134,474
  147,165
 176,389
 139,642
 $153,493
Long term debt (1) 
 3,835
  328
  
 $
Short term debt (2) 
 445
 
 
 $
Stockholders' equity 105,653
  110,977
 147,339
 91,284
 $111,495

(1) In December 2015, the Company entered into a three year credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association with a maximum borrowing capacity of $30.0 million. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

(2) In July 2016, the Company entered into two insurance premium finance agreements with First Insurance Funding Corporation and AFCO Acceptance Corporation, as lenders, under which the lenders will pay premiums, taxes and fees to insurance companies on the Company's behalf for various insurance policies under which the Company is the insured for policy terms ranging from 12 to 15 months. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

44




ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “SeaSpine” or the “Company” refer collectively to SeaSpine Holdings Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, unless otherwise stated. All information presented in this report is based on our fiscal year. Unless otherwise stated, references to particular years, quarters, months or periods refer to our fiscal years ending December 31 and the associated quarters, months and periods of those fiscal years.
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act.Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). The matters discussed in these forward-looking statements are subject to risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those made, projected or implied in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties may also give rise to future claims and increase exposure to contingent liabilities. Please see the “Risk Factors” section for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
You can identify these forward-looking statements by forward-looking words such as “believe,” “may,” “could,” “will,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “seek,” “plan,” “expect,” “should,” “would” and similar expressions.
These risks and uncertainties arise from (among other factors) the following::

general economic and business conditions, in both domestic and international markets;
our expectations and estimates concerning future financial performance, financing plans and the impact of competition;
our ability to successfully develop new and next-generation products and the costs associated with designing and developing those new and next-generation products, including risks inherent in collaborations, such as with restor3d, Inc. or use of nascent manufacturing techniques, such as additive processing/3D printing;
anticipated trends in our business, including healthcare reform in the United States, increased pricing pressure from our competitors or hospitals, exclusion from major healthcare systems, whether as a result of unwillingness to provide required pricing or otherwise, and changes in third-party payment systems;
physicians’ willingness to adopt our recently launched and planned products, customers’ continued willingness to pay for our products and third-party payors’ willingness to provide or continue coverage and appropriate reimbursement for any of our products and our ability to secure regulatory clearance and/or approval for products in development;
our ability to attract and retain new, high-quality distributors, whether as a result of perceived deficiencies, or gaps, in our existing product portfolio, inability to reach agreement on financial or other contractual terms or otherwise, as well as disruption associated with restrictive covenants to, which distributors may be subject and potential litigation and expense associate therewith;
the full extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic will, directly or indirectly, impact our business, results of operations and financial condition, including our sales, expenses, supply chain integrity, manufacturing capability, research and development activities, including arising from or relating to deferrals of procedures using our products, disruptions or restrictions on the ability of many of our employees and of third parties on which we rely to work effectively, and temporary closures of our facilities and of the facilities of our customers and suppliers;
our ability to continue to invest in medical education and training, product development, and/or sales and commercial marketing initiatives at levels sufficient to drive future revenue growth;
anticipated trends in our business, including consolidation among hospital systems, healthcare reform in the United States, increased pricing pressure from our competitors or hospitals, exclusion from major healthcare systems, whether as a result of unwillingness to provide required pricing or otherwise, and changes in third-party payment systems;
the risk of supply shortages, and the associated potentially long-term disruption to product sales, including as a result of the pandemic and a limited number of third-party suppliers for components, raw materials and certain processing and assembly services;

54



unexpected expenses and delay and our ability to manage timelines and costs related to manufacturing our products including as a result of litigation or developing and supporting the full commercial launch of new products or relating to the pandemic;
our ability to obtain additional debt and equity financing to fund capital expenditures and working capital requirements and acquisitions;
our ability to complete acquisitions, integrate operations post-acquisition and maintain relationships with customers of acquired entities;
our ability to support the safety and efficacy of our products with long-term clinical data;
existing and future regulations affecting our business, both in the United States and internationally, and enforcement of those regulations;
anticipated demand for our products and our ability to purchase or produce our products in sufficient quantities to meet customer demand;

our ability to manage timelines and costs related to manufacturing our products;

our ability to attract and retain new, high-quality independent sales agents, whether as a result of inability to reach agreement on financial or other contractual terms or otherwise, disruption to our existing distribution network as new independent sales agents are added, and the ability of new independent sales agents to generate growth or offset disruption to existing independent sales agents;
our ability to successfully develop new and next-generation products and the costs associated with designing and developing those new and next-generation products;
our ability to support the safety and efficacy of our products with long-term clinical data;
our ability to obtain additional debt and equity financing to fund capital expenditures and working capital requirements and acquisitions;
the risk of supply shortages, including our dependence on a limited number of third-party suppliers for components and raw materials;

45




our ability to protect our intellectual property, including unpatented trade secrets, and to operate without infringing or misappropriating the proprietary rights of others;
general economic and business conditions, in both domestic and international markets; and
our ability to complete acquisitions, integrate operations post-acquisition and maintain relationships with customers of acquired entities; and
other risk factors described in the section entitled “Risk Factors.”

These factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included in this report.
Spin-off from Integra

SeaSpine was incorporated in Delaware on February 12, 2015 in connection with the spin-off of the orthobiologics and
spinal implant business of Integra. The spin-off occurred on July 1, 2015.
For periods prior to the spin-off, our consolidated financial statements were prepared on a stand-alone basis and were derived from Integra’s consolidated financial statements and accounting records. Therefore, these financial statements reflected, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, the financial position, results of operations, comprehensive loss and cash flows as the orthobiologics and spinal implant business was historically operated as part of Integra.
The consolidated financial statements included the attribution of certain assets and liabilities that were historically held at the Integra corporate level but which were specifically identified or attributable to us. However, cash held by Integra was not attributed to us. Integra’s debt and related interest expense also were not allocated to us for any of the periods presented since we were not the legal obligor of the debt and Integra’s borrowings were not directly attributable to us. Integra managed cash centrally and substantially all cash generated by our business through May 4, 2015, the date we implemented a separate enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, for SeaSpine, was assumed to be remitted to Integra. All significant related party transactions between us and Integra were included in the consolidated financial statements and, prior to the spin-off, were considered to be effectively settled for cash at the time the transaction was recorded, with the exception of the purchases from Integra of Mozaik raw materials and finished goods for all periods presented. Prior to the spin-off, SeaSpine purchased a portion of raw materials and finished goods from Integra for the Mozaik family of products, and SeaSpine contract manufactured certain finished goods for Integra. The total net effect of the settlement of the transactions considered to be effectively settled for cash was reflected in the consolidated statements of cash flows as a financing activity.
Our consolidated statements of operations included our direct expenses for cost of goods sold, research and development, sales and marketing, distribution, and administration as well as allocations of expenses arising from shared services and infrastructure provided by Integra to us, such as costs of information technology, including the costs of a multi-year global ERP implementation, accounting and legal services, real estate and facilities, corporate advertising, insurance services and related treasury, and other corporate and infrastructure services. In addition, other costs allocated to us include restructuring costs, share-based compensation expense and retirement plan expenses related to Integra’s corporate and shared services employees. These operating expenses were allocated to us using estimates that we considered to be a reasonable reflection of the utilization of services provided to or benefits received by us. The allocation methods include pro-rata basis of revenue, standard cost of sales or other measures.

Integra provided some of the services related to these functions to us after the spin-off on a transitional basis for a fee under a transition services agreement. In addition, costs associated with supply agreements with Integra for our Mozaik product line are at materially different terms than those that were incurred while the business was part of Integra. Also, we are incurring costs as an independent, publicly-traded company that are different from the costs historically allocated to us by Integra.

Subsequent to the spin-off, our financial statements are presented on a consolidated basis, as we became a separate publicly-traded company on July 1, 2015.
We incurred $0.3 million and $20.1 million of non-recurring transaction and spin-off related costs and transition service fees from Integra in the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These costs include, among other things, branding,

46




legal, accounting and other advisory fees and other costs to separate and transition from Integra. No such costs were incurred during the year ended December 31, 2017.
Overview

We are a global medical technology company focused on the design, development and commercialization of surgical solutions for the treatment of patients suffering from spinal disorders. We haveoffer a comprehensive portfolio of orthobiologics and spinal implant solutions and a surgical navigation system intended to meet the varying combinationsneeds of products that neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons need towho perform fusion procedures in the lumbar, thoracic and cervical spine. We believe this broad combined portfolio of orthobiologics and spinal implant products isour offerings are essential to meet the “complete solution” requirements of suchthese surgeons.
We report revenue in two product categories: (i) orthobiologics and (ii) spinal implants.implants and enabling technologies. Our orthobiologics products consist of a broad range of advanced and traditional bone graft substitutes that are designed to improve bone fusion rates following a wide range of orthopedic surgeries, including spine, hip, and extremities procedures. Our spinal implantimplants and enabling technologies portfolio consists of an extensive line of products and image-guided surgical solutions to facilitate spinal fusion in MIS,degenerative, minimally invasive surgery (MIS), and complex spine,spinal deformity and degenerative procedures.
Our U.S. spinal implants and orthobiologics sales organization consists primarily of regional and territory managers who oversee a broad network of independent orthobiologics and spinal implant sales agents. We pay these sales agents commissions based on the sales of our products. Our enabling technologies sales organization consists of a direct sales force that works together with our independent sales agents to generate either a capital sale or to place systems and components in an account in a capital efficient manner in return for a longer-term revenue commitment for our spinal implant systems and/or orthobiologics products. Our international sales organization consists of a sales management team that oversees a network of independent orthobiologics and spinal implant stocking distributors that purchase products directly from us and independently sell them. For each of the years ended December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, international sales accounted for approximately 10% and 9% of our revenue, respectively.revenue. Our policy is not to sell our products through or to participate in physician-owned distributorships.
For the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, our total revenue, net was $131.8$191.5 million and our net loss was $32.1$54.3 million. For the same period, revenue from sales of orthobiologics totaled $91.8 million and revenue from spinal implants and enabling technologies totaled $69.1 million and $62.7 million, respectively.$99.6 million. We will continue to invest in the expansion of our business, primarily in sales, marketing and research and development, and we expect to continue to incur losses. As of December 31, 2017,2021, our cash and cash equivalents totaled $10.8$83.1 million. In January 2020 and April 2021, we completed an underwritten offering of our common stock that raised net proceeds of approximately $91.6 million and $94.5 million, respectively, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses.




55



Acquisition
In May 2021, we acquired 7D Surgical, Inc., a pioneer in the image-guided surgery market, that developed and commercialized advanced machine-vision-based registration algorithms to improve surgical workflow and patient care, currently with applications in spine and cranial surgeries. Its flagship system, founded on its machine-vision, image-guided surgery platform, reduces radiation exposure in open spine surgery by eliminating intra-operative CT (computed tomography) and fluoroscopy for purposes of registration, both of which commonly are used for patient registration with traditional navigational systems.
European Spinal Implant Sales and Marketing

During the third quarter of 2021, we ceased in-person sales and marketing operations in France to reduce operating expenses, to centralize the management of our European operations in our headquarters located in Carlsbad, California, and to further leverage our existing partnerships to centralize our logistics. As a result, we closed our office located in Lyon, France, and eliminated all employment positions at that location.

During the fourth quarter of February 26, 2018,2021, we had 327 employees.notified our European distributors that we will discontinue all sales and marketing activities for the spinal implant portfolio in the European market effective in September 2022 due to the significantly higher upfront and recurring annual costs required to comply with European medical device regulations.We will continue to market and sell our orthobiologics and enabling technologies products in the European market.
Components of Our Results of Operations
Revenue

Our net revenue is derived primarily from the sale of orthobiologics and spinal implantimplants and enabling technology products acrossin North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and Latin America. Sales are reported net of returns, rebates, group purchasing organization fees and other customer allowances.

In the United States, we generate most of our revenue by consigning our orthobiologics products and by consigning or loaning our spinal implant sets to hospitals and independent sales agents, who in turn either deliver them to hospitals for a single surgical procedure, after which they are returned to us, or leave them with hospitals that are high volume users for multiple procedures. The spinal implant sets typically contain the instruments, disposables, and spinal implants required to complete a surgery. We ship replacement inventory to independent sales agents to replace the consigned inventory used in surgeries. We maintain and replenish loaned sets at our kitting and distribution centers and return replenished sets to a hospital or independent sales agent for the next procedure. We recognize revenue on these consigned or loaned products when they have been used or implanted in a surgical procedure.

Enabling technologies revenue related to capital equipment, tools and software is recognized upon acceptance by the customer. Revenue from training and installation is recognized upon completion of the training and installation process. Revenue from service contracts is recognized over the term of the contract.
Under certain contracts, the transfer of capital equipment occurs over time as the customer's purchase commitments on other spinal implant and orthobiologics products are met. We allocate the transaction price to the multiple performance obligations under these contracts related to the sale of the products (recognized either upon the shipment or delivery of goods), the lease of capital equipment (recognized over the contract period), and the sale of capital equipment (recognized once the purchase commitments are met).
For all other sales transactions, including sales to international stocking distributors and private label partners, we generally recognize revenue when the products are shipped toand the customer or stocking distributor andobtains control of the transfer of title and risk of loss occurs.products. There is generally no customer acceptance or other condition that prevents us from recognizing revenue in accordance with the delivery terms for these sales transactions.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold primarily consists of the costs of finished goods purchased directly from third parties and raw materials used in the manufacturemanufacturing of our products, plant and equipment overhead, labor costs and packaging costs, amortization of product technology intangible assets and freight.costs. The majority of our orthobiologics products are designed and manufactured internally.

47




The cost of human tissue and fixed manufacturing overhead

56



costs are significant drivers of the costscost of goods sold, and consequently our orthobiologics products, at current production volumes, generate lower gross margin than our spinal implant products. We rely on third-party suppliers to manufacture our spinal implantimplants and enabling technology products, and we assemble themthe spinal implants into surgical sets at our kitting and distribution centers. The cost to inspect incoming finished goods and assemble them into new surgical sets is included in the cost of goods sold. Other costs included in cost of goods sold include amortization of product technology intangible assets, royalties, shipping,scrap and consignment losses, and charges for expired, excess and obsolete inventory. We expect our cost of goods sold to continue to increase in absolute dollars as our sales volume increases over time.

Selling General and AdministrativeMarketing Expense

Our selling general and administrative (SG&A)marketing expenses consist primarily of sales commissions, to independent sales agents, cost of medical education and training, payroll and other headcount related expenses, marketing expenses, shipping, third-party logistics expenses, depreciation of instrument sets, instrument replacement expense, stock-based compensation, marketingand cost of medical education and training.
General and Administrative Expense
Our general and administrative expenses supply chainconsist primarily of payroll and distributionother headcount related expenses, and expenses for information technology, legal, human resources, insurance, finance, facilities, and management. We also record gains or losses associated with changes in the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities in SG&Ageneral and administrative expenses.

Research and Development Expense

Our research and development (R&D) expenses primarily consist of expenses related to the headcount for engineering, product development, clinical affairs and regulatory functions, as well as consulting services, third-party prototyping services, outside research and clinical studies activities, and materials, production and other costs associated with development of our products. We expense R&D costs as they are incurred.

While our R&D expenses fluctuate from period to period based on the timing of specific initiatives, we expect that these costs will increase over time as we continue to design and commercialize new products and expand our product portfolio, add related personnel and conduct additional clinical activities.

Intangible Amortization
Our intangible amortization, including the amounts reported in cost of goods sold, consists of acquisition-related amortization. We expect total annual amortization expense (including amounts reported in cost of goods sold) to be approximately $6.5$7.2 million in 2018, $5.82022, $6.6 million in 2019, $4.92023, $4.6 million in 2020, $4.92024, $3.3 million in 2021,2025, and $4.8$3.3 million in 2022.
2026. See "

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
  Year Ended December 31, 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
 (In thousands, except percentages) 2017 2016 2015 % Change % Change
Total revenue, net $131,814
 $128,860
 $133,178
 2 % (3)%
Cost of goods sold 51,826
 55,544
 61,119
 (7)% (9)%
Gross profit 79,988
 73,316
 72,059
 9 % 2 %
Gross margin 61% 57% 54% 7 % 6 %
Operating expenses:       

 

Selling, general and administrative 97,303
 101,065
 110,551
 (4)% (9)%
Research and development 12,180
 11,442
 8,353
 6 % 37 %
Intangible amortization 3,168
 4,309
 5,331
 (26)% (19)%
Total operating expenses 112,651
 116,816
 124,235
 (4)% (6)%
Operating loss (32,663) (43,500) (52,176) (25)% (17)%
Other (income) expense, net (430) 264
 877
 (263)% (70)%
Loss before income taxes (32,233) (43,764) (53,053) (26)% (18)%
Provision (benefit) for income taxes (118) (552) 2,479
 (79)% (122)%
Net loss $(32,115) $(43,212) $(55,532) (26)% (22)%

48




YearOPERATIONS-Year Ended December 31, 20172021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20162020-Impairment of Intangible Assets," below.
COVID-19 Pandemic - Impact on our Business
The COVID-19 pandemic has presented a substantial public health and economic challenge around the world and has materially and adversely affected our business. From late March 2020 to mid-May 2020, among other impacts on our business related to the pandemic, surgeons and their patients deferred surgical procedures in which our products otherwise could have been used. This decrease in demand for our products temporarily recovered to varying degrees beginning in the latter half of May 2020 as conditions improved in certain geographies, allowing patients to resume receiving their treatments. However, from late November 2020 to mid-February 2021, a significant and sustained increase in COVID-19 cases and hospitalization rates once again caused the deferral of surgical procedures in which our products otherwise could have been used. Additionally, in the third quarter of 2021, hospitalization rates in many geographies increased as a result of the spread of the Delta variant. This, along with hospital support staffing shortages in certain geographies, adversely impacted the number of elective surgical procedures and slowed the partial recovery we had been experiencing. We expect to see continued volatility in the demand for our products in 2022 and thereafter as geographies respond to local conditions. We will continue to closely monitor developments related to the pandemic and our decisions will continue to be driven by the health and well-being of our employees, our distributor and surgeon customers, and their patients while maintaining operations to support our customers and their patients in the near-term.
At this time, the full extent of the impact of the pandemic on our business, financial condition and results of operations is uncertain and cannot be predicted with reasonable accuracy and will depend on future developments that are also uncertain and cannot be predicted with reasonable accuracy.

57



The effect of the pandemic will not be fully reflected in our results of operations and overall financial performance until future periods. For additional information on the various risks posed by the pandemic on our business, financial condition and results of operations, please see "Risk Factors" in Part I, Item 1A of this report.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 Year Ended December 31,
 (In thousands, except percentages)20212020
Total revenue, net$191,451 $154,345 
Cost of goods sold76,864 56,841 
Gross profit114,587 97,504 
Gross margin60 %63 %
Operating expenses:
Selling and marketing107,299 84,304 
General and administrative42,944 35,874 
Research and development22,006 16,258 
Intangible amortization3,316 3,169 
Impairment of intangible assets— 1,325 
Total operating expenses175,565 140,930 
Operating loss(60,978)(43,426)
Other income, net(5,532)(463)
Loss before income taxes(55,446)(42,963)
(Benefit) provision for income taxes(1,100)218 
Net loss$(54,346)$(43,181)




58



Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2020
Revenue
Total revenue, net in 2021 increased in 2017 by $3.0$37.1 million, or 2.3%24%, to $131.8$191.5 million compared to $128.9$154.3 million for the prior year.in 2020.
Year Ended December 31,
202120202021 vs. 2020
 (In thousands)% Change
Orthobiologics$91,822 $78,383 17 %
United States83,249 71,346 17 %
International8,573 7,037 22 %
     % of total revenue, net48 %51 %
Spinal implants and enabling technologies$99,629 $75,962 31 %
United States88,192 67,550 31 %
International11,437 8,412 36 %
     % of total revenue, net52 %49 %
Total revenue, net$191,451 $154,345 24 %
  Year Ended December 31,  
  2017 2016 2017 vs. 2016
  (In thousands) % Change
Orthobiologics $69,128
 $66,240
 4.4 %
United States 62,533
 59,458
 5.2 %
International 6,595
 6,782
 (2.8)%
     % of total revenue, net 52% 51%  
       
Spinal Implants $62,686
 $62,620
 0.1 %
United States 55,872
 57,342
 (2.6)%
International 6,814
 5,278
 29.1 %
     % of total revenue, net 48% 49%  
       
Total revenue, net $131,814
 $128,860
 2.3 %

Year Ended December 31,
 202120202021 vs. 2020
 (In thousands)% Change
United States171,441 138,896 23 %
     % of total revenue, net90 %90 %
International20,010 15,449 30 %
     % of total revenue, net10 %10 %
Total revenue, net$191,451 $154,345 24 %
  Year Ended December 31, 2017 vs. 2016
  2017 2016 % Change
  (In thousands)  
United States 118,405
 116,800
 1.4%
     % of total revenue, net 90% 91%  
International 13,409
 12,060
 11.2%
     % of total revenue, net 10% 9%  
Total revenue, net $131,814
 $128,860
 2.3%


Revenue from orthobiologics sales totaled $91.8 million in 2021, an increase of $13.4 million compared to 2020. Revenue from orthobiologics sales in the United States increased $3.1$11.9 million in 2017 to $62.5 million2021 compared to 2016 and2020. Revenue from orthobiologics sales internationally increased $1.5 million in 2021 compared to 2020. In all geographies, revenue in the prior year period was adversely impacted due to declines in the volume of surgeries performed due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, the revenue growth in the current year period was driven primarily by growthhigher sales of our fibers-based demineralized bone matrix (DBM) products as we continue to expand our market share in sales across multiple product lines generated by recently added independent sales agents.

the orthobiologics market.
Revenue from spinal implants and enabling technology sales totaled $99.6 million in 2021, an increase of $23.7 million compared to 2020. Revenue from spinal implant and enabling technology sales in the United States decreased $1.5 million to $55.9increased $20.6 million in 20172021 compared to 2016, primarily due to lower prices2020 and decreased usageincluded $6.0 million of capital sales from our legacy systems, which outpaced the revenue growth contributed by recently launched products and added independent sales agents.acquisition of 7D Surgical in May 2021. Revenue from international sales of spinal implants and enabling technologies increased $1.5 million to $6.8$3.0 million in 20172021 compared to 2016, primarily2020 and included $0.7 million of capital sales from recently acquired 7D Surgical. In all geographies, revenue in the prior year period was adversely impacted due to salesdeclines in the volume of surgeries performed due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, the revenue growth in the current year period was driven by recently added stocking distributorslaunched products, predominantly those products that were alpha or fully launched in Latin America2020 and Europe2021 and which have been important catalysts to increased salesour ability to an existing distributortake market share in Europe.the spinal implants market.
Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Margin

Cost of goods sold in 2017 decreased $3.72021 increased $20.0 million from 20162020 to $51.8$76.9 million. Gross margin was 61%60% in 2017 and 57% for the prior year.2021 compared to 63% in 2020. The increasedecrease in gross margin was mainly driven by lower manufacturing costs for orthobiologics products manufactured at our Irvine, California facility, and by a $1.7due to the $3.7 million provision for excess orthobiologics raw material inventory recorded in the first quarter of 2016. This provisioncharge related to management's decision to repurpose a portionan unfavorable purchase commitment, $1.6 million of our matched-donor bone raw material for other production uses,technology-related intangible asset amortization and $0.5 million of inventory purchase accounting fair market

59



value adjustments associated with the 7D Surgical acquisition, and higher inventory scrap all of which rendered a large portion of the remaining and now unmatched-donor bone as excess quantities that were unlikely to be consumed in future production. These improvements were partially offset by a $0.7 million increase$1.0 million of idle plant costs recorded in non-cash amortizationthe second quarter of technology intangible assets acquired in September 2016 from NLT and by lower gross margins2020 associated with international sales, which were slightly higher as a percentagethe nearly two-month shutdown of total revenue comparedorthobiologics manufacturing operations at our Irvine facility due to the prior year.effects of the pandemic.
Cost of goods sold included $3.6$2.7 million and $2.9$1.0 million of amortization for technology-basedproduct technology intangible assets for 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively, and $0.8$1.0 million and $1.2$1.0 million of depreciation expense for 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively.


49


Cost of goods sold for 2021 includes a $3.7 million charge related to a purchase commitment related to NanoMetalene processing services which primarily represents future fixed payments we are obligated to make to a supplier in connection with securing and maintaining long-term backup processing capacity.We no longer anticipate utilizing the backup processor for a meaningful portion of our future NanoMetalene processing service needs throughout the term of the agreement.



Selling and Marketing
Selling and marketing expenses increased $23.0 million to $107.3 million in 2021. The increase was driven by higher sales commissions due to increased sales in 2021, 7D Surgical sales and marketing costs, higher sales, marketing, customer service and logistics headcount and related expenses, additional spinal instrument set depreciation and instrument replacement expense due to product launches, and higher freight and third-party logistics expenses.
General and Administrative
SG&AGeneral and administrative expenses decreased $3.8increased $7.1 million to $97.3$42.9 million in 2017.2021. The decreaseincrease was mainly driven by a $3.6 million decrease in consulting and other expensesprimarily due to costs related to the completion in late 2016 of various significant information system related projects and of the project to outsource a large portionrestructuring of our spinal implant kittingEuropean sales and distribution to a third party logistics provider, a $1.5 million non-cash gain recorded in 2017marketing organization, legal and other fees incurred related to the releaseour acquisition and integration of a foreign capital tax liability after the statute of limitations expired, a $0.9 million non-cash gain recorded in 2017 due to a decrease in the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities related to the NLT acquisition, $1.0 million less in legal fees,7D Surgical and the impact of a $0.9 million spinal instrument impairment charge recorded in 2016. These decreases were partially offset by a $4.2 million increase in selling commissions.

higher general and administrative headcount.
Research and Development
R&D expenses increased $0.7$5.7 million to $12.2$22.0 million, in 2017, or 9%11% of revenue, in 2017.2021. The increase was primarily driven bydue to 7D Surgical research and development costs, a pre-technologically feasible patent purchase and higher external costsR&D headcount and related to product development related to our orthobiologics products, and by fees incurred under the transition services agreement with NLT related to continued development of the acquired expandable interbody device technology.expenses.
Intangible Amortization
Intangible amortization expense, excluding the amounts reported in cost of goods sold for product technology intangible assets, decreased $1.1was $3.3 million in 2021 compared to $3.2 million in 2017 compared to 2016. The decrease is2020.
Impairment of Intangible Assets
There was no impairment of intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2021. Impairment of expandable interbody product technology intangible assets was $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. During the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily due toas a customer relationships intangible that was fully amortized by July 2016.
Income Taxes
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016
 (In thousands)
Loss before income taxes$(32,233) $(43,764)
Benefit for income taxes(118) (552)
Effective tax rate0.4% 1.3%

The primary driverresult of an expected shift in future product revenue mix more toward a parallel expanding interbody device designed based on our internally developed technology and, in turn, lower future revenue anticipated for the lordotic expanding implant based on acquired technology, our estimated future net sales associated with those acquired product technologies decreased. Accordingly, we evaluated the ongoing value of the effective tax rate in 2017 wasproduct technology intangible assets associated with the acquisition of these assets. Based on this evaluation, we determined that intangible assets with a benefit relatedcarrying amount of $1.6 million were no longer recoverable and were impaired, and we wrote those intangible assets down to the releasetheir estimated fair value of uncertain tax positions due to the lapse of the statute of limitations. In 2016 we$0.3 million.
Income Taxes
 Year Ended December 31,
 20212020
 (In thousands)
Loss before income taxes$(55,446)$(42,963)
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes(1,100)218 
Effective tax rate2.0 %(0.5)%

60



We reported an income tax benefit based onfor the finalization ofyear ended December 31, 2021 primarily related to foreign operations including 7D Surgical. We reported an income tax return for our U.S. subsidiary which was not part of our consolidated tax groupexpense for the tax period January 1, 2015 through Augustyear ended December 31, 2015, offset by2020 primarily related to federal, foreign income taxes.and state operations.


In addition, for any pretax losses incurred subsequent to the spin-off by the consolidated U.S. tax group, or otherwise, we recorded no corresponding tax benefit because we have concluded that it is more-likely-than-not that we will be unable to realize the benefit fromfull value of any resulting deferred tax assets. We will continue to assess our position in future periods to determine if it is appropriate to reduce a portion of our valuation allowance in the future.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax CutsThe acquisition of 7D Surgical was a treated as an asset purchase for US tax purposes and Jobs Act (2017 Tax Act) was signed into law and has resulted in significant change to the U.S corporate incomea stock purchase for Canadian tax system. The 2017 Tax Act includes a federal statutory rate reduction from 35% to 21%. Since our U.S. netpurposes. As such, we recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities on our Canadian tax attributes. We are currently offset byable to use our deferred tax liabilities as a full valuations allowance, the change in tax rate has not impacted our effective tax rate for the period ending December 31, 2017. The Company is not subject to the new transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings enacted by the 2017 Tax Act since the foreign operations have been included in US tax filings pursuant to an election to disregard these entities for federalsource of income tax purposes.
Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015
Revenue
Total revenue, net decreased in 2015 by $4.3 million, or 3%, to $128.9 million compared to $133.2 million for the prior year.

50




  Year Ended December 31,  
  2016 2015 2016 vs. 2015
  (In thousands) % Change
Orthobiologics $66,240
 $67,258
 (1.5)%
United States 59,458
 59,873
 (0.7)%
International 6,782
 7,385
 (8.2)%
     % of total revenue, net 51%
51%  
       
Spinal Implants $62,620
 $65,920
 (5.0)%
United States 57,342
 60,386
 (5.0)%
International 5,278
 5,534
 (4.6)%
     % of total revenue, net 49% 49%  
       
Total revenue, net $128,860
 $133,178
 (3.2)%
  Year Ended December 31, 2016 vs. 2015
  2016 2015 % Change
  (In thousands)  
United States 116,800
 120,259
 (2.9)%
     % of total revenue, net 91% 90%  
International 12,060
 12,919
 (6.6)%
     % of total revenue, net 9% 10%  
Total revenue, net $128,860
 $133,178
 (3.2)%

The decline in orthobiologics revenue was primarily driven by lower demand for our products, particularly our synthetic bone matrix products, lower average selling prices and a shift to lower cost first and second generation DBM products due to increasing pricing pressures in the U.S. market.

Revenue from spinal implants sales in the United States decreased $3.0 million to $57.3 million in 2016 compared to 2015 due to continued mid-single digit pricing pressures and lower demand for our older product lines, particularly in our thoracolumbar systems.
Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Margin
Cost of goods sold in 2016 decreased $5.6 million from 2015 to $55.5 million. Gross margin was 57% in 2016 and 54% for the prior year. The increase in gross margin was mainly driven by lower manufacturing costs in 2016 related to our Mozaik product, which we began manufacturing internally at a cost that was lower than the amount we previously paid for the product under our supply agreement with Integra and that was substantially lower than the valuation of Mozaik finished goods inventory as determined by pre-spinoff, carve-out accounting and sold in 2015, the absence of a $2.6 million charge taken in the third quarter of 2015 for excess and obsolete Spinal Implants inventory intended for distribution in international markets, the absence of $0.5 million of allocation expenses from Integra in 2015, and a decrease of $0.5 million in fees incurred for services under a transition services agreement with Integra. These decreases were partially offset by a $1.7 million provision for excess orthobiologics raw material inventory recorded in the first quarter of 2016 related to management's decision to repurposeagainst a portion of our matched-donor bone raw materialdeferred tax assets. A valuation allowance was recorded for other production uses and that rendered a largethe portion of the remaining and now unmatched-donor bone as excess quantitiesdeferred tax assets that were unlikely to be consumed in future production, and a $0.8 million provision for excess and obsolete inventory recorded in the fourth quarter of 2016 related to our launch of a sterile packaged version of our NanoMetalene interbody devices product line. With the launch of the sterile packaged product, we are no longer actively selling the non-sterile packaged NanoMetalene inventory.
Cost of goods sold included $2.9 million and $2.7 million of amortization for product technology intangible assets in 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $1.2 million and $0.3 million of depreciation expense for 2016 and 2015, respectively.

51




Selling, General and Administrative
SG&A expenses decreased $9.5 million to $101.1 million in 2016. The decrease was mainly driven by a $1.6 million decrease in fees incurred for services under a transition services agreement with Integra, the absence of $17.2 million of nonrecurring spin-off related charges and the absence of $1.9 million of medical device tax, which was suspended at the end of 2015. In 2015, SG&A expense included $8.6 million in allocated expenses from Integra. Since the spin-off, we have directly incurred those expenses that were previously allocated from Integra, including the compensation and related costs of our executive management team and expenses associated with being an independent, publicly-traded company, such as audit, insurance, and information technology-related fees. We have also incurred greater expense from the hiring of additional marketing, sales and administrative headcount since the spin-off, and incurred $1.4 million of expenses in 2016 related to the shutdown of our former Vista facility, and $0.5 million of acquisition-related charges.
Research and Development
R&D expenses increased $3.1 million to $11.4 million in 2016, which was 9% of revenue in 2016. The increase was primarily driven by a $2.2 million increase in compensation costs due to an increase in headcount, and a $1.0 million increase in external costs related to product development and clinical studies, offset by the absence of $0.3 million of allocated expenses from Integra in 2015.
Intangible Amortization

Intangible amortization expense, excluding the amounts reported in cost of goods sold for product technology intangible assets , decreased $1.0 million to $4.3 million in 2016, primarily due to non-compete agreements that were fully amortized by the second quarter of 2015, and a customer relationships intangible that was fully amortized by the third quarter of 2016.
Income Taxes
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Loss before income taxes$(43,764) $(53,053)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(552) 2,479
Effective tax rate1.3% (4.7)%

The primary drivers of the effective tax rate in 2016 and 2015 were pretax losses incurred by the consolidated U.S. tax group that received no corresponding tax benefit and pretax income incurred by a U.S. subsidiary not included in our U.S. consolidated federal income tax return prior to September 1, 2015.

We reported income tax benefit in 2016 primarily based on the finalization of an income tax return for our U.S. subsidiary which was not part of the U.S. consolidated tax group for the tax period January 1, 2015 through August 31, 2015 offset by foreign income taxes. We reported income tax expense in 2015 related to the taxable income generated by a U.S. subsidiary that was not part of the U.S. consolidated tax group through August 31, 2015. As such, despite the losses before income taxes reported in those periods, the taxable income generated by such U.S. subsidiary was not allowed to be offset against the taxable losses generated by our other U.S. subsidiaries through August 31, 2015. Effective September 1, 2015, we made an election that allows us to offset any future taxable losses generated by our U.S. subsidiaries against any future taxable income generated by our U.S. subsidiaries.

The income tax provision in the consolidated statements of operations for periods prior to the spin-off was calculated using the separate return method, as if we had filed a separate tax return and operated as a stand-alone business. However, because Integra historically generated taxable income in excess of our pretax losses incurred prior to the spinoff and all of our U.S. subsidiaries that incurred these pretax losses were included in Integra’s U.S. consolidated tax group, those pretax losses were more than offset by Integra’s taxable income. Therefore, there were no U.S. net operating losses available to us for future use at the date of the spin-off.
In addition, for any pretax losses incurred subsequent to the spin-off by the consolidated U.S. tax group or otherwise, we recorded no corresponding tax benefit because we have concluded that it is more-likely-than-not that we will be unable to realizerealize. A net tax benefit of $1.5 million was recorded as a result of the benefit from any resulting deferred7D Surgical current year losses. This was offset by expenses recorded for indefinite lived intangibles, current foreign and state taxes and prior year state tax assets. We will continuetrue-ups.
In March 2020, Congress enacted the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) to assessprovide certain relief as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The CARES Act, among other things, includes provisions relating to net operating loss carryback periods, alternative minimum tax credit refunds, and modification to the net interest deduction limitations. The CARES Act did not have a material impact on our position in future periodsconsolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2021 or 2020.
Other Income
Other income for the year ended December 31, 2021 primarily consisted of the gain on the forgiveness of debt related to determine if it is appropriate to reduce a portion of our valuation allowance in the future.loan we obtained under the Paycheck Protection Program under the CARES Act.


52




Business Factors Affecting the Results of Operations
Special Charges and Gains
We define special charges and gains as expenses or non-operating gains and gainslosses for which the amount or timing can vary significantly from period to period, and for which the amounts are non-cash in nature, or the amounts are not expected to recur at the same magnitude.
We believe that identification of these special charges and gains provides important supplemental information to investors regarding financial and business trends relating to our financial condition and results of operations. Investors may find this information useful in assessing comparability of our operating performance from period to period, against the business model objectives that management has established, and against other companies in our industry. We provide this information to investors so that they can analyze our operating and financial results in the same way that management does and use this information in their assessment of theour core business and valuation of SeaSpine.valuation.

61



Loss before income taxes includes the following special charges and gains for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 2015:
2020:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Special Charges:(In thousands)
SeaSpine spin-off related charges$
 $
 $17,278
Transition services agreement charges
 265
 2,809
Discontinued and excess/obsolete product line charges
 
 2,600
Excess raw material charge
 1,700
 
Acquisition-related charges
 457
 
Total Special Charges$
 $2,422
 $22,687
      
Special Gains:     
Non-cash gain from release of a foreign non-income tax liability$(1,512) $
 $
Non-cash gain from change in fair value of contingent consideration liabilities
(975) (270) 
Total Special Gains$(2,487) $(270) $
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
Special Charges and (Gains):(In thousands)
Severance and other costs associated with European sales and marketing reorganization1,826 — 
Purchase accounting inventory fair market value542 — 
Unfavorable purchase commitment3,704 — 
Idle manufacturing plant costs— 974 
Impairment of intangible assets(1)
— 1,325 
Acquisition and integration-related charges for 7D Surgical2,302 — 
Gain on forgiveness of PPP Loan(6,173)— 
Total Special Charges, net$2,201 $2,299 
(1) Relates to the impairment of acquired NLT product technology intangible assets.

The items reported above are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
 (In thousands)
Cost of goods sold$4,246 $974 
Impairment of intangible assets$— $1,325 
General and administrative4,128 — 
Other income, net(6,173)$ 
Total Special Charges, net$2,201 $2,299 

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Cost of goods sold$
 $1,704
 $3,248
Research and development
 8
 348
Selling, general and administrative
 710
 19,091
Total Special Charges$
 $2,422
 $22,687
      
Selling, general and administrative$(2,375) $
 $
Other income(112) (270) 
Total Special Gains$(2,487) $(270) $
These special charges and gains are directly related to the SeaSpine business, do not include allocations from Integra, and consist of the following items:

SeaSpine spin-off related charges include legal, accounting, program management and outside consulting expenses incurred as part of the spin-off from Integra, and incremental personnel costs associated with becoming an independent, publicly-traded company that were duplicative to the allocations from Integra.


53




Transition services agreement charges include charges from Integra immediately after the spin-off for the performance of certain transition services to SeaSpine until we hired the internal support and completed the build out of our infrastructure such that we could function separately as an independent, publicly traded company.

A shift in management’s international sales strategy in 2015 that rendered a large portion of our spinal implant inventory intended for distribution in international markets as excess and obsolete.

The excess raw material charge in 2016 relates to management’s decision to repurpose a portion of our matched-donor bone raw material for other production uses and that rendered a large portion of the remaining and now unmatched-donor bone as excess quantities that were unlikely to be consumed in future production.

Acquisition-related charges include transaction fees and the amortization of inventory fair value adjustments related to acquisitions.

Gain from release of a foreign non-income tax liability is due to the passage of the statute of limitations.

Gain from change in fair value of contingent consideration relates to the decrease in the fair value of contingent milestone and royalty payments associated with the NLT acquisition in 2016.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview,

Capital Resources, and Capital Requirements
As of December 31, 2017,2021, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling approximately $10.8$83.1 million, and $20.5$26.4 million of current borrowing capacity was available under our credit facility. We believe that our cash and cash equivalents, on hand and the amount currently available to us under our credit facility, will be sufficient to fund our operations and meet our contractual obligations for at least the next twelve months.

Paycheck Protection Program Loan
In April 2020, due to the economic uncertainty resulting from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operations and to support our ongoing operations and retain all employees, we applied for a loan under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act). We received a loan in the original principal amount of $7.2 million. The Company subsequently repaid $1.0 million of the loan. We used the loan proceeds for purposes consistent with the terms of the PPP and applied for forgiveness of the entire $6.2 million loan balance, which was granted in June 2021. The $6.2 million gain on the loan forgiveness is included in other income, net, in the consolidated statement of operations. There were no amounts outstanding under the loan at December 31, 2021. The loan is subject to audit by the Small Business Association (SBA) for up to six years after the date of loan forgiveness. If the SBA determines that we did not qualify for all or part of the loan, we would need to repay all or a part of the loan.

62



Credit Facility

We have a $30.0 million credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association which expiresmatures in December 2018, subject to a one-time, one-year extension at our election. July 2022.
At December 31, 2017,2021, we had no outstanding borrowings under the credit facility. The borrowing capacity under the credit facility is determined monthly and is based on the amount of our eligible accounts receivable and inventory balances and qualified cash (as defined in the credit facility). Depending on the extent to which our eligible accounts receivable and inventory balances increase, our borrowing capacity could increase by as much as an additional $6.0$0.1 million from the $20.5$26.4 million available as of December 31, 20172021 before we are required to maintain the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio as discussed below. The credit facility contains various customary affirmative and negative covenants, including prohibiting us from incurring indebtedness without the lender’s consent. Under the terms of the credit facility, if our Total Liquidity (as defined in the credit facility) is less than $5.0 million, we are required to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.10 to 1.00 for the applicable measurement period. Our Total Liquidity was $29.2$109.0 million at December 31, 2017,2021, and therefore that financial covenant was not applicable at that time.

Business Combinations

Underwritten Offerings
In August 2016,January 2020, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with NLT to acquire certain of the assets of NLT’s medical device business related to the expandable interbody medical devices. We made an up-front cash payment of $1.0 million in connection with the initial closing in September 2016 and issued 350,000sold 7,820,000 shares of our common stock, resulting in January 2017 as contingent closing consideration. At December 31, 2017,proceeds of approximately $91.6 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
In April 2021, we recorded a $2.6 million liability representing the estimated fair value of future contingent milestone payments related to the achievement of certain commercial milestones, which we anticipate will become payable at varying times between 2018 and 2023, and a $1.8 million liability representing the estimated fair value of future contingent royalty payments based on percentages of our future net sales of certain of the products and technology we acquired, which we anticipate will become payable at varying times between 2017 and 2028. The contingent milestone payments, if any, are payable in cash or insold 5,175,000 shares of our common stock, at our election. The contingent royalty payments are payableresulting in cash.


54




At The Market Program

In August 2016, we entered into an equity distribution agreement with Piper Jaffray & Co. (Piper Jaffray), pursuant to which we may offer and sell shares of our common stock in “at the market” (ATM) offerings (as defined in Rule 415 of the Securities Act) having an aggregate offering price up to $25.0 million in gross proceeds from time to time through Piper Jaffray acting as sales agent. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we received net proceeds of approximately $15.6$94.5 million, net of $0.6 million ofafter deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering costs, from the sale of 1,500,000 shares of our common stock.

In February 2018, we received net proceeds of approximately $8.6 million, net of $0.2 million of offering costs, from the sale of approximately 882,000 shares of our common stock and which consumed the remaining capacity under the ATM equity distribution agreement.
expenses payable by us.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We had cash and cash equivalents totaling approximately $10.8$83.1 million and $14.6$76.8 million at December 31, 20172021 and December 31, 2016,2020, respectively.
Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015 Year Ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015 % Change % Change 20212020
(In thousands) 
 
(In thousands)
Net cash used in operating activities$(8,622) $(14,270) $(32,566) (40)% (56)%Net cash used in operating activities$(33,512)$(24,599)
Net cash used in investing activities(7,646) (8,719) (11,705) (12)% (26)%Net cash used in investing activities(55,358)(17,042)
Net cash provided by financing activities12,040
 4,276
 77,130
 182 % (94)%Net cash provided by financing activities95,545 98,138 
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash450
 (150) (82) (400)% 83 %
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents$(3,778) $(18,863) $32,777
 (80)% (158)%
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalentsEffect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(382)117 
Net change in cash and cash equivalentsNet change in cash and cash equivalents$6,293 $56,614 
Net Cash Flows Used in Operating Activities
We used $8.6 million and $14.3 million in operating activities during 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Operating cash outflows during 2017 decreased by $5.6 million compared to 2016, primarily due to higher revenue, and lower cash-based operating expenses incurred, partially offset by lower trade payable balances in 2017 as compared to 2016.

Operating cash outflows during 2016 increased by $18.3 million compared to 2015. Net loss plus adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities increased cash inflows by $12.4 million, largely driven by the absence of spin-off related charges. Among the changes in working capital, our more efficient management of inventory in 2016 increased operating cash flows by $9.8 million compared to 2015 for inventory purchases and the efficiency with which we collected accounts receivable in 2016 increased operating cash inflows by $6.3was $33.5 million in 2016 compared2021 compared to 2015. The timing of payments to suppliers and settlement of accrued expenses in 2016 decreased operating cash flows by $14.0$24.6 million in 2016 compared2020,. The increase of $8.9 million was due primarily to 2015.increases in inventory to support our product launches.
Net Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used inby investing activities was $7.6$55.4 million in 20172021 compared to $8.7$17.0 million in 2016.2020. The $1.1$38.3 million decreaseincrease was primarily attributabledue to larger investments in leasehold improvements in our Carlsbad facility in$28.0 million of net cash paid for the first half of 2016 and to the $1.07D Surgical acquisition, $10.0 million cash payment associated with the NLT acquisition in 2016, offset by $1.8 million more in instrument purchases in 2017 to support new product launches.
Net cash used in investing activities was $8.7 million in 2016 compared to $11.7 million in 2015. The $3.0 million decrease was primarily attributable to the completion of a global ERP system implementation in 2015, a $0.7 million decreaseincrease in purchases of spinal implant setsproperty and instruments relatedequipment and $0.4 million of increased additions to existing products and new product launches in 2016, and decreased purchases in other capital expenditures, offset by the $1.0 million cash paid in connection with the NLT acquisition in 2016.

technology assets.
55

63






Net Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $12.0$95.5 million in 20172021 compared to $4.3$98.1 million in 2016, and $77.1 million2020. Cash flows provided by financings in 2015. Financing cash flows for 20172021 were comprised primarily of $15.6$94.5 million ofin net proceeds from the saleissuance of shares of our common stock, under the ATM equity offering program and $1.0$4.0 million of proceeds from the saleissuance of shares of our common stock under our 2015 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. We used $4.0 million of cash to repay all of the outstanding borrowings under the credit facility and $0.4 million of cash to repay the remaining short-term debt related to our insurance premium finance agreements (see Note 4 "Debt and Interest" to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report).
We borrowed $3.3 million under the credit facility in 2016 and generated $0.7 million in cash from sales of our common stock under our employee stock purchase program. The higher net cash providedplan and from the exercise of stock options partially offset by financing activities$2.9 million in 2015 resultedrepurchases of common stock from an investment from Integra and the $34.0 million cash contribution from Integra in connection with the spin-off in 2015.

vesting of restricted stock awards to cover statutory tax withholding requirements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There were no off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 20172021 that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to our business.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
As of December 31, 2017,2021, we were obligated to pay the following amounts under various agreements:
    TotalLess than 1 Year1-3 Years4-5 YearsMore than 5 Years

Total Less than 1 Year 1-3 Years 4-5 Years More than 5 Years(In millions)
(In millions)
Employment Agreements$0.7
 $0.5
 $0.2
 $
 $
Operating Leases17.1
 2.1
 4.3
 4.5
 6.2
Operating Leases10.2 2.8 3.2 3.0 1.2 
Purchase Obligations10.5
 10.5
 
 
 
Purchase Obligations30.7 30.7 — — — 
Credit Facility
 
 
 
 
Other2.2
 1.2
 1.0
 
 
Other4.1 2.4 1.7 — — 
Total$30.5
 $14.3
 $5.5
 $4.5
 $6.2
Total$45.0 $35.9 $4.9 $3.0 $1.2 
The "Other" line item includes minimum royalties and milestone payments under certain license agreements, and guaranteed commissions. Total contractual obligations and commitments listed in theagreements. The table above table excludes the following liabilities:liabilities because we cannot reliably estimate the timing of when they may become payable, if ever:
the liability for uncertain tax benefits, including interest and penalties, totaling approximately $0.3 million;
the contingent milestone and royalty payments related to the NLT asset acquisition; and
up to $1.1 million in the aggregate of potential royalty and milestone payments forunder a license agreement under which there are certain cumulative milestone payments totaling $2.4 millionthat may be payable at various stages of developing the licensed technology and sales of products using the licensed technology.
These liabilities have been excluded because we cannot make a reliable estimate of the timing of the triggering events and associated payments.
Critical Accounting PolicesPolicies and the Use of Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these
Preparing consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires usmanagement to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Significant estimates affecting amounts reported or disclosed in the consolidated financial statements include revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts receivable and sales returnreturns and other credits, revenue recognition, net realizable value of inventories, amortization periods for acquired intangible assets, estimates ofdiscount rates and estimated projected cash flows and discount rates used to value intangible assets and test them for impairment,impairments of goodwill, identifiable intangible and long-lived assets, fair value estimates of projected cash flows andrelated to business combinations, assumptions related to the timing and probability of the product

56




launch dates, discount rates matched to the estimated timing of payments, and probability of success rates used to value contingent consideration liabilities from business combinations, estimates of projectedand discount adjustments on the related cash flows andfor contingent considerations in business combinations, depreciation and amortization periods for identifiable intangible and long-lived assets, valuation of stock-based compensation, computation of taxes, and valuation allowances recorded against deferred tax assets, the valuation of stock-based compensation and loss contingencies. These estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the current circumstances. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

The full extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic will directly or indirectly impact the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition, including revenues, expenses, manufacturing, research and development costs and employee-related compensation, will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain, including as a result of variants of the virus that causes COVID-19 or other information that may emerge concerning COVID-19 and the actions taken to

64



contain or treat COVID-19, as well as the economic impact on local, regional, national and international customers and markets. The Company has made estimates of the impact of the pandemic within its financial statements and there may be changes to those estimates in future periods. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
We believe that the following accounting policies, which form the basis for developing these estimates, are those that are most critical to the presentation of our consolidated financial statements and require the more difficult subjective and complex judgments:

Revenue Recognition

Our netNet sales are derived primarily from the sale of orthobiologics and spinal implantimplants and enabling technology products globally. Sales are reported net of returns, rebates, group purchasing organization fees and other customer allowances.

Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidenceobligations under the terms of an arrangement exists,a contract with the Company's customer are satisfied which occurs with the transfer of control of the Company's products. This occurs either upon shipment or delivery has occurred, title and risk of loss have passed togoods, depending on whether the customer, therecontract is a fixedFree on Board (FOB) origin or determinable sales price and collectability of that sales price is reasonably assured.

In the United States, we generate most of our revenue by consigning our orthobiologics products and consigningFOB destination, or, loaning our spinal implant sets to hospitals and independent sales agents, who in turn deliver them to the hospital for a single surgical procedure or leave them with hospitals that are high volume users for use in multiple procedures. The spinal implant sets typically contain the instruments, including disposables, and spinal implants required to complete a surgery. We ship replacement inventory to independent sales agents to replace the consigned inventory used in surgeries and maintain and replenish the loaned sets and return them to a hospital or independent sales agent for the next procedure. We recognize revenue on these consigned or loaned products when they have been used or implanted in a surgical procedure.

For all other transactions, including sales to international stocking distributors, we recognize revenuesituations such as consignment arrangements, when the products are shippedused in a surgical procedure (implanted in a patient) and in the case of capital equipment, when the equipment has been accepted by the customer.

Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for transferring products to a customer (transaction price). To the extent that the transaction price includes variable consideration, such as discounts, list price discounts, rebates, volume discounts and customer payment penalties, the Company estimates the amount of variable consideration that should be included in the transaction price utilizing the most likely amount method. Variable consideration is included in the transaction price if, in the Company’s judgment, it is probable that a significant future reversal of cumulative revenue under the contract will not occur. Estimates of variable consideration and determination of whether to include estimated amounts in the transaction price are based largely on an assessment of the Company’s anticipated performance and all information (historical, current and forecasted) that is reasonably available.

The Company reduces revenue by estimates of potential future product returns and other allowances. Provisions for product returns and other allowances are recorded as a reduction to revenue in the period sales are recognized. The Company estimates the amount of sales returns and allowances that will eventually be incurred. Certain contracts with stocking distributors contain provisions requiring the Company to repurchase inventory upon termination of the contract or discontinuation of a product line. Included in the sales returns reserve within other current liabilities is an estimate of repurchases that are likely to be made under these provisions. Management analyzes sales programs that are in effect, contractual arrangements, market acceptance and historical trends when evaluating the adequacy of sales returns and allowance accounts.

In certain sales arrangements, the Company fulfills its obligations and bills the customer for the products prior to the shipment of goods. The Company allocates the transaction price to the multiple performance obligations under these contracts, including delivery of the products and the third-party logistics (3PL) performance obligations. Revenue related to product sales under these arrangements is not recognized until the Company delivers the products to the customer’s dedicated space within the Company’s facility, at which point the customer or stocking distributorobtains control of the products. Revenue from the related 3PL obligations consists of revenue from storage of products which is recognized ratably over the service period, and revenue from shipping services which is recognized upon performance of such obligation.

Additionally, the Company allocates the transaction price to the multiple performance obligations under the contracts related to the sale of capital equipment, including the capital equipment, tools and software, the training and installation and the service. Revenue related to capital equipment, tools and software under these arrangements is recognized upon customer acceptance of the system. Revenue from training and installation is recognized upon completion of the training and installation process. Revenue from service contracts is recognized over the term of the contract.

Under certain contracts, the transfer of titlecapital equipment occurs over time as the customer's purchase commitments on other spinal implant and riskorthobiologics products are met. The Company allocates the transaction price to the multiple performance obligations under these contracts related to the sale of loss occurs. Therethe products (recognized either upon the shipment or delivery of goods, as discussed above), the lease of capital equipment (recognized over the contract period), and of the sale of capital equipment (recognized once the purchase commitments are generally no customer acceptance or other conditions that prevent usmet).

Deferred revenue primarily consists of payments received in advance of revenue recognition from recognizingthe sales of the Company's capital equipment and related products as described above and is recognized as the revenue in accordance with the delivery terms.recognition criteria are met.



65



Product royalties account for less than 1% of total revenue for any of the periods presented and are estimated and recognized in the same period that the royalty-based products are sold by licensees. We estimateThe Company estimates and recognizerecognizes royalty revenue based upon communication with licensees, historical information and expected sales trends. Differences between actual revenues and estimated royalty revenues are adjusted in the period in which they become known, which is typically the following quarter. Historically, such adjustments have not been significant.material.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable

We evaluate the collectability of accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. In circumstances where a specific customer is unable to meet its financial obligations to us, we record an allowance to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount that we reasonably expect to collect. For all other customers, we record allowances for doubtful accounts based on the length of time the receivables are past due, the current business environment and our historical experience. If the financial condition of customers or the length of time that receivables are past due were to change, we may incur bad debt expense in SG&A.general and administrative expense.


Inventories

Inventories, consisting of purchased materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead, are stated at the lower of cost, the value determined by the first-in, first-out method, or the marketnet realizable value methods. At each balance sheet date, we evaluate ending inventories for excess quantities, obsolescence or shelf-life expiration. Our evaluation includes an analysis of our current and future strategic plans, historical sales levels by product, projections of future demand by product, the risk of technological or competitive obsolescence for our products, general market conditions, a review of the shelf-life expiration dates for our products, and the feasibility of reworking or using excess or obsolete products or components in the production or assembly of other products that are not obsolete or for which we do not have excess quantities in inventory. To the extent that we determine there are excess or obsolete quantities or quantities with a shelf life that is too near its expiration for us to reasonably expect that we can sell those products prior to their expiration, we adjust their carrying value to estimated net realizable value. If future demand or market conditions are lower than our projections or if we are unable to rework excess or obsolete quantities into other products, we may record further adjustments to the carrying value of inventory through a charge to cost of goods sold in the period the revision is made. In addition, we capitalize inventory costs associated with certain products prior to regulatory

57




approval, based on management’s judgment of probable economic benefit. We could be required to expense previously capitalized costs related to pre-approval inventory upon a change in such judgment, due to, among other potential factors, a denial or delay of approval by necessary regulatory bodies or a decision by management to discontinue the related development program.

Leases
Property, PlantWe determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Our leases primarily relate to administrative, manufacturing, research, and Equipment

Property, plantdistribution facilities and equipment is carriedvarious manufacturing, office and transportation equipment. Lease assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Lease assets and liabilities are recognized at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line methodcommencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As our leases do not provide an asset’s estimated useful life. Maintenanceimplicit rate, our incremental borrowing rate is used as a discount rate, based on the information available at the commencement date, in determining the present value of lease payments. Lease assets also include the impact of any prepayments made and repairsare reduced by impact of any lease incentives.
We made an accounting policy election for short-term leases, such that we will not recognize a lease liability or lease asset on its balance sheet for leases with a lease term of twelve months or less as of the commencement date. Rather, any short-term lease payments will be recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The current period short-term lease expense reasonably reflects the Company's short-term lease commitments.
We made a policy election for all propertyclassifications of leases to combine lease and equipmentnon-lease components and to account for them as a single lease component. Variable lease payments are expensed asexcluded from the lease liability and recognized in the period in which the obligation is incurred. Depreciation of spinal instrument sets and instrument replacement expenseAdditionally, lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is recorded in SG&A.reasonably certain we will exercise the option.


66



Valuation of Identifiable Intangible Assets

Our intangible assets are comprised primarily of product technology, customer relationships, and trade name and trademarks. We make significant judgments in relation to the valuation of intangible assets resulting from business combinations and asset acquisitions. Significant estimates include, but are not limited to, measurements estimating cash flows and determining the appropriate discount rate.

Upon acquisition, identifiable intangible assets are recorded at fair value and are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 1 to 20 years. We base the useful lives and related amortization expense on the period of time we estimate the assets will generate revenues or otherwise be used by the Company. We also periodically review the lives assigned to our intangible assets to ensure that our initial estimates do not exceed any revised estimated periods from which we expect to realize cash flows from the technologies. If a change were to occur in any of the above-mentioned factors or estimates, the likelihood of a material change in our reported results would increase.

We review identifiable intangible assets with definite lives for impairment quarterly or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that we consider in determining whether a triggering event has occurred include a significant change in the business climate, legal factors, operating performance indicators, competition, sale or disposition of significant assets or products. Application of these impairment tests requires significant judgments, including estimation of future cash flows, which is dependentdepends on internal forecasts, estimation of the long-term rate of growth for our business, the useful life over which cash flows will occur and determination of our weighted-average cost of capital.
Should a triggering event be deemed to occur, we are required to estimate the expected net cash flows to be realized over the life of the asset and/or the asset’s fair value. Fair values are determined by a discounted cash flow model. These estimates are also subject to significant management judgment including the determination of many factors such as revenue growth rates, cost growth rates, terminal value assumptions and discount rates. Changes in these estimates can have a significant impact on the determination of cash flows and fair value and could potentially result in future material impairments.

Due to market trend factors, new features necessary to be competitive, and changing pricing dynamics, there were shifts in the commercialization strategy of some of the acquired product technologies and the estimated future net sales associated with those technologies. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we performed a recoverability test and determined that the expected net cash flows to be realized over the life of the technology related intangible assets were no longer recoverable and were impaired. See Note 5, "Balance Sheet", to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part IV of this report for additional information regarding these impairments. If our estimates of expected cash flows continue to decline, we may record additional impairment charges on the related intangible assets in the future.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase prices of an acquired business over the fair value of the underlying net tangible and intangible assets. The Company is required to assess goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred.
We first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test. If, after completing the qualitative assessment, we determine it is more likely than not that the estimated fair value is greater than the carrying value, we conclude no impairment exists. Alternatively, if we determine in the qualitative assessment that it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than its carrying value, then we perform a quantitative goodwill impairment test to identify both the existence of an impairment and the amount of impairment loss, by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, then a goodwill impairment charge will be recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. We perform the goodwill annual assessment test during the fourth quarter every year and when an event occurs or circumstances change such that it is reasonably possible that an impairment may exist.
We assess qualitative factors to determine whether goodwill is impaired. The qualitative analysis includes assessing the impact of changes in certain factors including: (1) changes in forecasted operating results and comparing actual results to projections, (2) changes in the industry or our competitive environment since the acquisition date, (3) changes in the overall economy, our market share and market interest rates since the acquisition date, (4) trends in the stock price and related market capitalization

67



and enterprise values, (5) trends in peer companies’ total enterprise value metrics, and (6) additional factors such as management turnover, changes in regulation and changes in litigation matters.
Based on our qualitative assessment performed during the fourth quarter of 2021, we concluded that it was more likely than not that the estimated fair value of our reporting units exceeded their carrying value as of December 31, 2021, and therefore, determined it was not necessary to perform a quantitative goodwill impairment test.
Valuation of Stock-Based Compensation

The estimated fair value of stock-based awards exchanged for employee and non-employee director services are expensed over the requisite service period.

For purposes of calculating stock-based compensation, we estimate the fair value of stock options using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards utilizing the Black-Scholes model is affected by our stock price and a number ofseveral assumptions, including expected volatility, expected term, risk-free interest rate and expected dividends. Due to our limited historical data as a separate public company, the expected volatility is calculated based upon the historical volatility of comparable companies in the medical device industry whose share prices are publicly available for a sufficient period of time. The expected term of "plain vanilla" options is calculated using the simplified method as prescribed by accounting guidance for stock-based compensation. A "plain vanilla" option is an option with the following characteristics: (1) the option is granted at-the-money; (2) exercisability is conditional only on satisfaction of a service condition through the vesting date; (3) employees who terminate their service prior to vesting forfeit the options; (4) employees who terminate their service after vesting are granted limited time to exercise their stock options; and (5) the options are nontransferable and nonhedgeable. The expectedhistorical weighted average term of any other option is based on disclosures from similar companies with similar grants.the Company’s options. The risk-free interest rates are derived from the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect on the date of grant for instruments with a remaining term similar to the expected term of the options. We considered that we have never paid cash

58




dividends and do not currently intend to pay cash dividends. The fair value of restricted stock awards granted is based on the market price of our common stock on the date of grant. In addition, we apply an expected forfeiture rate when amortizing stock-based compensation expense. The expected forfeiture rate is based on historical experience of pre-vesting forfeitures on awards by each homogenous group of shareowners and is estimated to be 15%, 12%9% and 10%13% annually for all non-executive employees for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 2015,2020, respectively. There is noWe do not apply a forfeiture rate applied forto awards (including stock options) granted to non-employee directors andor executive employees asbecause their pre-vesting forfeitures are anticipated to be highly unlikely. As individual grant awards become fully vested, stock-based compensation expense is adjusted to recognize actual forfeitures.

If factors change and we employ different assumptions, stock-based compensation expense may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the past. If there is a difference between the assumptions used in determining stock-based compensation expense and the actual factors which become known over time, specifically with respect to anticipated forfeitures, we may change the input factors used in determining stock-based compensation costs for future grants. These changes, if any, may materially impact our results of operations in the period such changes are made.

Income Taxes

The income tax provision in the consolidated statements of operations for periods prior to the spin-off was calculated using the separate return method, as if we filed a separate tax return and operated as a stand-alone business. Therefore, cash tax payments and items of current and deferred taxes may not be reflective of our actual tax balances included in Integra’s historical consolidated income tax return. More specifically, the presentation of substantial net operating losses, and any related valuation allowances, presented herein prior to the spin-off do not represent actual net operating losses that have been incurred by us or that are available for carryforward to a future tax year.

The primary driver of the effective tax rate in 2017 was a benefit related to the release of uncertain tax positions due to the lapse of the statute of limitations. We reported income tax benefit in 2016 primarily based on the finalization of an income tax return for our U.S. subsidiary which was not part of the U.S consolidated tax group for the tax period January 1, 2015 through August 31, 2015 offset by foreign income taxes.

Changes in the tax rates of the various jurisdictions in which we operate affect our profits. In addition, we maintain a reserve for uncertain tax benefits, changes to which could impact our effective tax rate in the period such changes are made. The effective tax rate can also be impacted by changes in valuation allowances of deferred tax assets, and tax law changes.

Our provision for income taxes may change period-to-period based on specific events, such as the settlement of income tax audits and changes in tax laws, as well as general factors, including the geographic mix of income before taxes, state and local taxes.

We recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position. The amount of the accrual for which an exposure exists is not material for any period presented.

We believe that we have identified all reasonably identifiable exposures and the reserve we have established for identifiable exposures is appropriate under the circumstances; however, it is possible that additional exposures exist and that exposures will be settled at amounts different than the amounts reserved. It is also possible that changes in facts and circumstances could cause us to either materially increase or reduce the carrying amount of our tax reserves.

Our deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their basis for income tax purposes, and also the temporary differences created by the tax effects of capital loss, net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. We record valuation allowances to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts that are more likely than not to be realized. We could recognize no benefit from our deferred tax assets or we could recognize some or all of the future benefit depending on the amount and timing of taxable income we generate in the future.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017 reducesChanges in the U.S federal corporatetax rates of the various jurisdictions in which we operate affect our profits. In addition, we maintain a reserve for uncertain tax benefits, changes to which could impact our effective tax rate in the period such changes are made. The effective tax rate can also be impacted by changes in tax law and in valuation allowances of deferred tax assets.
Our provision for income taxes may change period-to-period based on specific events, such as the settlement of income tax audits and changes in tax laws, as well as general factors, including the geographic mix of income before taxes, state and local taxes.
We recognize a tax benefit from 35%an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not to 21%. Accordingly,be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position. The amount of the accrual for which an exposure exists is not material for any period presented.

68



We believe that we have modifiedidentified all reasonably identifiable exposures and the valuereserve we have established for identifiable exposures is appropriate under the circumstances; however, it is possible that additional exposures exist and that exposures will be settled at amounts different than the amounts reserved. It is also possible that changes in facts and circumstances could cause us to either materially increase or reduce the carrying amount of the deferredour tax assets and liabilities including the net operating loss carryover at December 31, 2017. The Company is not subject to the new transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings enacted by the 2017 Tax Act since the foreign operations have been included in US tax filings pursuant to an election to disregard these entities for federal income tax purposes.


59




reserves.
Loss Contingencies

We areThe Company is subject to claims and lawsuitsvarious legal proceedings in the ordinary course of ourits business with respect to ourits products, ourits current or former employees, and involvingits commercial disputes. We accruerelationships. The Company accrues for loss contingencies when it is deemed probable that a loss has been incurred and that loss is estimable. The amounts accrued are based on the full amount of the estimated loss before considering insurance proceeds, if applicable, and do not include an estimate for legal fees expected to be incurred in connection with the loss contingency. We accrueThe Company accrues legal fees expected to be incurred in connection with loss contingencies as those fees are incurred by outside counsel as a period cost. OurThe Company's financial statements do not reflect any material amounts related to possible unfavorable outcomes of claims and lawsuits to which we areit is currently a party because weit currently believebelieves that such claims and lawsuits are not expected, individually or in the aggregate, to result in a material and adverse effect on ourits financial condition.


ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK


WeBecause we were a "smaller reporting company," as defined in Item 10 of Regulation S-K, during the year covered by this report, we are exposednot required to various market risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates that could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.provide the information required by this Item.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk


We operate on a global basis and are exposed to the risk that changes in foreign currency exchange rates could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In 2017, 2016 and 2015, we generated revenues outside the United States in multiple foreign currencies including euros, British pounds, and Swiss francs, and in U.S. dollar-denominated transactions conducted with customers who generated revenue in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We also incur operating expenses in euros. As a result, changes in the exchange rates of any such foreign currency versus the U.S. dollar may affect our revenues, gross profits and net loss and may also affect the book value of our assets and the amount of stockholders’ equity. We cannot predict the consolidated effects of exchange rate fluctuations upon our future operating results because of the variability of foreign currency exposure in our revenues and operating expenses and the potential volatility of currency exchange rates.
Interest Rate Risk

Our primary exposure to market risk is interest expense and interest income sensitivity, which is affected by changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates.

Our cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2017 consisted of cash and money market accounts. We are exposed to market risk related to fluctuations in interest rates and market prices. We currently do not hedge interest rate exposure. However, because of the short-term nature of the instruments in our portfolio, a sudden change in market interest rates would not be expected to have a material impact on our financial condition and/or results of operation.

We had no outstanding borrowings under our credit facility as of December 31, 2017. Our borrowings under the credit facility accrue interest at the rate then applicable to the base rate loans (as customarily defined), unless and until converted into LIBOR rate loans in accordance with the terms of the credit facility. Borrowings bear interest at a floating annual rate equal to (a) during any month for which our average excess availability (as customarily defined) is greater than $20.0 million, base rate plus (i) 1.25 percentage points for base rate loans and (ii) LIBOR rate plus 2.25 percentage points for LIBOR rate loans, (b) during any month for which our average excess availability is greater than $10.0 million but less than or equal to $20.0 million, (i) base rate plus 1.50 percentage points for base rate loans and (ii) LIBOR rate plus 2.50 percentage points for LIBOR rate loans and (c) during any month for which our average excess availability is less than or equal to $10.0 million, (i) base rate plus 1.75 percentage points for base rate loans and (ii) LIBOR rate plus 2.75 percentage points for LIBOR rate loans. A hypothetical 100 basis point change in interest rates would not be expected to have a material effect on our net loss for the period or cash flow.
ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Financial statements and the financial statement schedules specified by this Item, together with the reportsreport thereon of RSM US LLP and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, are presented following the signature page to this report.
Information on quarterly results of operations is set forth in our financial statements under Note 14, “Selected Quarterly Information — Unaudited,” to our consolidated financial statements.


60




ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.None.


69



ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Based on an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013 Framework). Based on this assessment, our management concluded that, as of December 31, 2017,2021, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.
Attestation Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
As an emerging growth company, under Section 103 of RSM US LLP, the JOBS Act, we are not required to provide, and this report does not include, an attestation report of ourCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm, regarding ourhas issued an attestation on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.reporting which is included herein.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rules 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) under the Exchange Act that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2017to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


Inherent

70




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of SeaSpine Holdings Corporation


Opinion on the Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited SeaSpine Holdings Corporation's (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2021 of the Company and our report, dated March 14, 2022, expressed an unqualified opinion.

Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal ControlsControl Over Financial Reporting

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or ourA company's internal controlscontrol over financial reporting willis a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectivesmisstatements. Also, projections of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, noany evaluation of controls can provide absolute assuranceeffectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.


/s/ RSM US LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 14, 2022

61

71






ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.




ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.

62

72






Part III


Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Information required by this item will be set forth under the headings “PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS,” “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION,” and, “SECTIONif applicable, “DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE”REPORTS” in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC in connection with our 20182022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or the Definitive Proxy Statement, which is expected to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2021, and is incorporated in this report by reference.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The information required by this item will be set forth under the heading "EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION" in the Definitive Proxy Statement and is incorporated in this report by reference.

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The information required by this item will be set forth under the headings “SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT” and “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION” in the Definitive Proxy Statement and is incorporated in this report by reference.

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

The information required by this item will be set forth under the headings “CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS” and “PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS” in the Definitive Proxy Statement and is incorporated in this report by reference.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

The information required by this item will be set forth under the headings “PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM” in the Definitive Proxy Statement and is incorporated in this report by reference.



63

73






PART IV


ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) Documents filed as a part of this report.
1. Financial Statements.
The following financial statements and financial statement schedules are filed as a part of this report:
All other schedules not listed above have been omitted, because they are not applicable or are not required, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.


3. Exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K.


The following exhibits, as required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K, are attached or incorporated by reference as stated below. We will furnish a copy of any exhibit to stockholders without charge upon written request to Investor Relations, SeaSpine Holdings Corp., 5770 Armada Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008, or by calling Investor Relations at (760) 727-8399.

64

74



EXHIBIT INDEX
Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.DescriptionFiled or Furnished HerewithFormFile/Film No.Date Filed
2.1(a)*#Form 10-Q001-36905-16198776411/10/2016
2.1(b)Form 10-Q001-36905-16198776411/10/2016
2.1(c)Form 10-K001-36905-176651333/3/2017
2.2#3.1Form 8-K001-36905-159661327/1/2015
3.1Form 8-K001-36905-15966132001-36905-219965217/1/20156/4/2021
3.2
3.2Form 8-K001-36905-15966132001-36905-219965217/1/20156/4/2021
4.1
4.1Form 10001-36905-159045906/1/2015
4.2Form S-3333-213089-161825462333-236802-206742908/11/20162/28/2020
10.14.3Form 8-KS-3001-36905-15966132333-236802-206742907/1/20152/28/2020
10.24.4Form 8-K10-K001-36905-15966132001-36905-206726047/1/20152/28/2020
10.310.1Form 8-K10-Q001-36905-15966132001-36905-218846857/1/20155/3/2021
10.410.2Form 8-K001-36905-159661327/1/2015
10.3Form 8-K001-36905-217682843/24/2021
10.4Form 10-Q001-36905-2111496748/5/2021


6575



10.5Form 8-K10-Q001-36905-15966132001-36905-218846857/1/20155/3/2021
10.610.6**Form 8-K001-36905-159661327/1/2015
10.7**Form 8-K001-36905-159661327/1/2015
10.8**Form 108-K001-36905-15904590001-36905-198705086/1/20155/31/2019
10.9**10.7Form 10-Q001-36905-2111496748/5/2021
10.8(a)**Form 10001-36905-159045906/1/2015
10.10*10.8(b)**DEF 14A001-36905-197532144/17/2019
10.8(c)**
DEF 14A001-36905-218419034/21/2021
10.9(a)**Form 10001-36905-159045906/1/2015
10.11*10.9(b)**Form 8-K001-36905-197817544/30/2019
10.9(c)**Form 8-K001-36905-208150664/24/2020
10.10**Form 10001-36905-159045906/1/2015
10.12*10.11**Form 10001-36905-159045906/1/2015
10.13(a)10.12**Form 108-K001-36905-15904590001-36905-208150666/1/20154/24/2020

76



66


10.15(b)10.14(b)Form 10001-36905-159045906/1/2015
10.1610.15Form 8-K001-36905-1511034339/11/2015
10.17*10.16**Form 8-K001-36905-1613789362/2/2016
10.18**10.17(a)Form 8-K001-36905-1614722533/1/2016
10.19**Form 10-K001-36905-1615103993/16/2016
10.20(a)


Form 10-K001-36905-1615103993/16/2016
10.20(b)10.17(b)Form 10-K001-36905-176651333/3/2017
10.21**10.17(c)Form 10-Q001-36905-161653403001-36905-1811640065/16/201611/6/2018
10.22(a)**10.17(d)Form 10-Q001-36905-20107411608/4/2020

77



67



78


10.22(e)10.18(g)**Form S-8333-211887-1617001556/7/2016
10.22(f)10.18(h)**

Form 10-K001-36905-176651333/3/2017
10.22(g)10.18(i)**XForm 10-K001-36905-186632423/2/2018
10.23*10.18(j)**Form 10-K001-36905-206726042/28/2020
10.18(k)**

Form 10-Q001-36905-189791177/31/2018
10.18(l)**Form 10-Q001-36905-189791177/31/2018
10.18(m)**Form 8-K001-36905-215712391/29/2021
10.19(a)**Form 10-Q001-36905-189791177/31/2018
10.19(b)**Form 10-Q001-36905-189791177/31/2018

79


10.19(c)**Form 10-Q001-36905-189791177/31/2018
10.19(d)**Form 10-Q001-36905-189791177/31/2018
10.20(a)**Form 10-Q001-36905-2010741168/4/2020
10.20(b)**Form 10-Q001-36905-2010741168/4/2020
10.20(c)**Form 10-Q001-36905-2010741168/4/2020
10.20(d)**Form 10-Q001-36905-2010741168/4/2020
10.21**Form 10-Q001-36905-189791177/31/2018
10.22**Form 10-Q001-36905-178187195/5/2017
21.110.23(a)*Form 8-K001-36905-18111627610/10/2018
10.23(b)Form 10-K001-36905-217196693/5/2021
10.24*Form 10-Q001-36905-197886145/1/2019

80



68


32.1***X
32.2***X
†101.INSInline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.X
†101.SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema DocumentX
†101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase DocumentX
†101.DEFInline XBRL Definition Linkbase DocumentX
†101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase DocumentX
†101.PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase DocumentX

*Confidential treatment has been requested or granted to certain confidential information contained in this exhibit. Such information was omitted from this exhibit by means of redacting a portion of the text and replacing it with an asterisk. We have filed separately with the SEC an unredacted copy of the exhibit.
#104Certain schedules and attachments referenced in this agreement have been omitted in accordance with Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. A copy of any omitted schedule and attachment will be furnished supplementally to the SEC upon request.
Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within Exhibit 101.INS Inline XBRL document)X
**Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
***These certifications are being furnished solely to accompany this report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation by reference language in such filing.
The financial information of SeaSpine Holdings Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 filed on March 2, 2018 formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss, (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) Parenthetical Data to the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (vi) the Consolidated Statements of Equity, and (vii) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, is furnished electronically herewith.


81


*    Confidential treatment has been requested or granted to certain confidential information contained in this exhibit. Such information was omitted from this exhibit by means of redacting a portion of the text and replacing it with an asterisk. We have filed separately with the SEC an unredacted copy of the exhibit.
#    Certain schedules and attachments referenced in this agreement have been omitted in accordance with Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. A copy of any omitted schedule and attachment will be furnished supplementally to the SEC upon request.
**    Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
***    These certifications are being furnished solely to accompany this report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation by reference language in such filing.
†    The financial information of SeaSpine Holdings Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 filed on March 14, 2022 formatted in iXBRL (Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss, (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) Parenthetical Data to the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (vi) the Consolidated Statements of Equity, and (vii) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, is furnished electronically herewith.
ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.


82
69








SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Date:March 2, 201814, 2022/s/ Keith C. Valentine
Keith C. Valentine
President and Chief Executive Officer



70

83






Power of Attorney


KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Keith C. Valentine and John J. Bostjancic, jointly and severally, his or her attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for him or her in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Keith C. Valentine
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
March 2, 201814, 2022
Keith C. Valentine
/s/ John J. Bostjancic
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
March 2, 201814, 2022
John J. Bostjancic
/s/ Kirtley C. Stephenson

ChairmanChair of the BoardMarch 2, 201814, 2022
Kirtley C. Stephenson
/s/ Stuart M. Essig Ph.D.Lead Independent DirectorMarch 2, 201814, 2022
Stuart M. Essig Ph.D.
/s/ Cheryl R. Blanchard, Ph.D.DirectorMarch 2, 201814, 2022
Cheryl R. Blanchard, Ph.D.Keith Bradley
/s/ Keith Bradley Ph.D.DirectorMarch 2, 2018
Keith Bradley Ph.D.
/s/ Michael Fekete

DirectorMarch 2, 201814, 2022
Michael Fekete
/s/ Renee M. GaetaDirectorMarch 14, 2022
Renee M. Gaeta
/s/ John B. Henneman, III

DirectorMarch 2, 201814, 2022
John B. Henneman, III
/s/ James M. Sullivan
DirectorMarch 2, 201814, 2022
James M. SullivanShweta Singh Maniar
/s/ Angela SteinwayDirectorMarch 14, 2022
Angela Steinway







71

84









REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of SeaSpine Holdings Corporation


Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of SeaSpine Holdings Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2017,2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the year thentwo years in the period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements and schedule (collectively, the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017,2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the year thentwo years in the period ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013, and our report dated March 14, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s financial statements based on our audit.audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB)PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our auditaudits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our auditaudits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our auditaudits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Excess and Obsolete Inventory Reserves
As described in Note 2 and Schedule II to the financial statements, the Company’s inventory reserves balance was $42.3 million as of December 31, 2021. The Company’s inventories are valued at the lower of cost, the value determined by the first-in, first-out method, or net realizable value. The Company reviews the components of its inventories on a periodic basis for excess and obsolescence and adjusts inventories to its net realizable value as necessary. The valuation of inventories requires management to make significant assumptions, including assumptions about product life cycle and projections of future demand as well as specific product considerations such as timing of the introduction and development of new or enhanced products. We identified valuation of excess and obsolete inventory reserves, which is included in the inventory reserves balance, as a critical audit matter because of the significant assumptions and judgements used by management in estimating adequate reserves. Auditing management’s assumptions was complex and required a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity when performing audit procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained. Our audit procedures related to the Company’s excess and obsolete inventory reserves included the following, among others:
a.We obtained an understanding of the relevant controls over the Company’s excess and obsolete inventory reserves, including the completeness and accuracy of data used in the process, and tested such controls for design and operating effectiveness.
b.We evaluated the reasonableness of the methodology, assumptions and data used in the Company’s estimate by:
a.Comparing the on-hand inventory quantities to projections of future demand and historical sales and evaluating adjustments to projections of future demand for specific product considerations, such as timing of the introduction and development of new or enhanced product; and

1


b.Assessing the historical accuracy of management’s estimate and performing sensitivity analyses over the significant assumptions to evaluate the impact of changes in the obsolete and excess inventory reserve that would result from changes in the underlying assumptions.

Valuation of Acquired Intangible Assets
As described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company completed the acquisition of 7D Surgical, Inc. (“7D Surgical”) for $120.6 million on May 20, 2021. The Company accounted for this transaction under the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values, including identified intangible assets of $32.3 million and resulting goodwill of $84.6 million. In order to determine the fair value of the identified intangible assets, which consist of trademarks & tradenames and patents & technology, the Company used an income approach valuation model. The model requires management to make significant assumptions, which include, where applicable, forecast of future cash flows, forecasted revenue growth rates, royalty rates and discount rates.

We identified the valuation of acquired intangible assets as a critical audit matter as there was a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and increased audit effort, including the use of valuation specialists, when performing audit procedures and evaluating audit evidence related to the reasonableness of significant estimates and assumptions utilized in management’s calculation of intangible asset valuations.

We obtained an understanding of the relevant controls related to the valuation of the intangible assets acquired and tested such controls for design and operating effectiveness, including management review controls related to the development of the significant assumptions including revenue, gross margins, growth rates, royalty rates and discount rates.

We utilized historical data and compared management’s revenue and gross margin forecasts to the most recent actual data available to determine reasonableness of assumptions for revenue, gross margins, and growth rates.

With the assistance of our valuation specialists, we evaluated the reasonableness of the royalty rates and discount rates and, tested the relevance and reliability of source information underlying the determination of the royalty rates, discount rates and testing the mathematical accuracy of the calculation, and developed a range of independent estimates and compared those to the royalty rates and discount rates selected by management.


 /s/ RSM US LLP
    
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2017.

/s/ RSM US LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 2, 201814, 2022




























F- 1

2




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of SeaSpine Holdings Corporation:

In our opinion, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2016 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of SeaSpine Holdings Corporation and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2016 , in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the schedule of valuation and qualifying accounts for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2016 presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Diego, California
March 3, 2017





F- 2




SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
 
Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015 20212020
Total revenue, net$131,814
 $128,860
 $133,178
Total revenue, net$191,451 $154,345 
Cost of goods sold51,826
 55,544
 61,119
Cost of goods sold76,864 56,841 
Gross profit79,988
 73,316
 72,059
Gross profit114,587 97,504 
Operating expenses:

 

  Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative97,303
 101,065
 110,551
Selling and marketingSelling and marketing107,299 84,304 
General and administrativeGeneral and administrative42,944 35,874 
Research and development12,180
 11,442
 8,353
Research and development22,006 16,258 
Intangible amortization3,168
 4,309
 5,331
Intangible amortization3,316 3,169 
Impairment of intangible assetsImpairment of intangible assets— 1,325 
Total operating expenses112,651
 116,816
 124,235
Total operating expenses175,565 140,930 
Operating loss(32,663) (43,500) (52,176)Operating loss(60,978)(43,426)
Other (income) expense, net(430) 264
 877
Other income, netOther income, net(5,532)(463)
Loss before income taxes(32,233) (43,764) (53,053)Loss before income taxes(55,446)(42,963)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(118) (552) 2,479
(Benefit) provision for income taxes(Benefit) provision for income taxes(1,100)218 
Net loss$(32,115) $(43,212) $(55,532)Net loss$(54,346)$(43,181)
Net Loss per share, basic and diluted$(2.58) $(3.85) $(4.99)
Net loss per share, basic and dilutedNet loss per share, basic and diluted$(1.62)$(1.59)
Weighted average shares used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share12,426
 11,222
 11,139
Weighted average shares used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share33,604 27,222 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F- 3








SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(In thousands)
 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Net loss$(32,115) $(43,212) $(55,532)
Other comprehensive income (loss)     
Change in foreign currency translation adjustments678
 (119) 498
Comprehensive loss$(31,437) $(43,331) $(55,034)



 Year Ended December 31,
 20212020
Net loss$(54,346)$(43,181)
Other comprehensive (loss) income
Foreign currency translation adjustments(554)690 
Comprehensive loss$(54,900)$(42,491)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-

4






SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value data)
 
December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
   
ASSETS   ASSETS
Current assets:   Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$10,788
 $14,566
Cash and cash equivalents$83,106 $76,813 
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowances of $466 and $48321,872
 20,982
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowances of $74 and $192, respectivelyTrade accounts receivable, net of allowances of $74 and $192, respectively36,231 26,154 
Inventories41,721
 45,299
Inventories72,299 54,041 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets2,037
 1,813
Prepaid expenses and other current assets4,328 3,884 
Total current assets76,418
 82,660
Total current assets195,964 160,892 
Property, plant and equipment, net22,063
 21,863
Property, plant and equipment, net46,892 31,422 
Right of use assets, netRight of use assets, net6,948 7,658 
Intangible assets, net35,207
 41,785
Intangible assets, net42,056 13,883 
GoodwillGoodwill84,595 — 
Other assets786
 857
Other assets812 546 
Total assets$134,474
 $147,165
Total assets$377,267 $214,401 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY   LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:   Current liabilities:
Short-term debt$
 $445
Accounts payable, trade7,385
 8,537
Accounts payable, trade$20,301 $5,006 
Accrued compensation5,833
 4,393
Accrued compensation8,769 8,198 
Accrued commissions5,793
 4,398
Accrued commissions9,877 8,199 
Contingent consideration liabilities207
 2,855
Short-term debtShort-term debt— 1,114 
Short-term lease liabilityShort-term lease liability2,234 2,147 
Deferred revenueDeferred revenue1,545 102 
Other accrued expenses and current liabilities3,939
 3,790
Other accrued expenses and current liabilities10,255 5,961 
Total current liabilities23,157
 24,418
Total current liabilities52,981 30,727 
Long-term borrowings under credit facility
 3,835
Contingent consideration liabilities4,228

5,125
Long-term debtLong-term debt— 5,059 
Long-term lease liabilityLong-term lease liability5,866 6,802 
Deferred tax liability, netDeferred tax liability, net4,308 — 
Other liabilities1,436
 2,810
Other liabilities1,748 95 
Total liabilities28,821
 36,188
Total liabilities64,903 42,683 
   
Commitments and contingencies
 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)00
Stockholders' equity:   Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 15,000 authorized; no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016
 
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 60,000 authorized; 13,508 and 11,258 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively135
 113
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 15,000 authorized; no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 15,000 authorized; no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020— — 
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 60,000 authorized; 36,584 and 27,729 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectivelyCommon stock, $0.01 par value; 60,000 authorized; 36,584 and 27,729 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively366 277 
Additional paid-in capital206,844
 180,753
Additional paid-in capital584,031 388,574 
Accumulated other comprehensive income1,950
 1,272
Accumulated other comprehensive income1,570 2,124 
Accumulated deficit(103,276) (71,161)Accumulated deficit(273,603)(219,257)
Total stockholders' equity105,653
 110,977
Total stockholders' equity312,364 171,718 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$134,474
 $147,165
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$377,267 $214,401 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F- 5





SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

 Year Ended December 31,
 20212020
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss$(54,346)$(43,181)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization13,933 10,725 
Instrument replacement expense3,904 2,799 
Impairment of spinal instruments— 210 
Impairment of intangible assets— 1,325 
Provision for excess and obsolete inventories5,220 5,515 
Stock-based compensation11,856 10,357 
Gain on forgiveness of Paycheck Protection Program Loan(6,173)— 
Other(919)272 
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of the effects from acquisition:
Trade accounts receivable(7,926)(1,119)
Inventories(18,995)(10,480)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets659 40 
Other assets(175)(93)
Accounts payable, trade10,665 (2,691)
Accrued commissions1,675 342 
Other accrued expenses and current liabilities5,169 1,396 
Other liabilities1,941 (16)
Net cash used in operating activities(33,512)(24,599)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property and equipment(26,041)(16,085)
Additions to technology assets(1,361)(950)
Purchases of short-term investments— (25,007)
Maturities of short-term investments— 25,000 
Acquisition, net of cash acquired(27,956)— 
Net cash used in investing activities(55,358)(17,042)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Borrowings under credit facility20,000 — 
Proceeds from Paycheck Protection Program Loan— 7,173 
Repayments of credit facility(20,000)— 
Repayments of Paycheck Protection Program Loan— (1,000)
Debt issuance costs(45)— 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock- employee stock purchase plan and exercise of stock options3,991 2,632 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of offering costs94,531 91,622 
Repurchases of common stock for income tax withheld upon vesting of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units(2,887)(2,164)

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:     
Net loss$(32,115) $(43,212) $(55,532)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization10,871
 11,758
 12,445
Instrument replacement expense1,848
 1,389
 1,228
Impairment of spinal instruments
 919
 175
Impairment of construction in progress
 
 419
Provision for excess and obsolete inventories4,399
 5,402
 7,327
Amortization of debt issuance costs139
 139
 
Deferred income tax benefit(78) (10) (282)
Stock-based compensation6,067
 6,438
 3,816
Gain from change in fair value of contingent consideration liabilities
(975) (270) 
Gain from release of a foreign non-income tax liability(1,512) 
 
Allocation of non-cash charges from Integra
 
 563
Changes in assets and liabilities     
Accounts receivable(612) 4,295
 (2,004)
Inventories1,206
 1,404
 (8,365)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets(211) 1,877
 (2,867)
Other non-current assets72
 79
 1,335
Accounts payable(2,080) (5,006) 5,818
Income taxes payable
 
 (320)
Accrued commissions1,394
 166
 335
Other accrued expenses and current liabilities2,630
 167
 3,316
Other non-current liabilities335
 195
 27
Net cash used in operating activities(8,622) (14,270) (32,566)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:     
Purchases of property and equipment(7,446) (7,569) (11,555)
Additions to technology assets(200) (1,150) (150)
Net cash used in investing activities(7,646) (8,719) (11,705)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:     
        Borrowings under credit facility
 3,300
 
        Borrowings under short term debt
 1,202
 
        Repayments of credit facility(4,020) 
 
        Repayments of short term debt(445) (757) 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock- employee stock purchase plan and exercise of stock options1,021
 691
 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of offering costs- ATM transactions15,557
 
 
Repurchases of common stock for income tax withheld upon vesting of restricted stock(50) (160) 
Payment of contingent consideration liabilities in connection with acquisition of business (see Note 6)
(23) 
 
        Integra net investment prior to the spin-off
 
 77,173
        Debt issuance costs
 
 (80)
        Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements
 
 37
Net cash provided by financing activities12,040
 4,276
 77,130
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents450
 (150) (82)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents(3,778) (18,863) 32,777
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period14,566
 33,429
 652
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$10,788
 $14,566
 $33,429
6

F- 6





SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
(In thousands)



Payment of contingent royalty consideration liabilities in connection with acquisition of businessPayment of contingent royalty consideration liabilities in connection with acquisition of business(45)(125)
Net cash provided by financing activitiesNet cash provided by financing activities95,545 98,138 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalentsEffect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(382)117 
Net change in cash and cash equivalentsNet change in cash and cash equivalents6,293 56,614 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of periodCash and cash equivalents at beginning of period76,813 20,199 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of periodCash and cash equivalents at end of period$83,106 $76,813 
Supplemental cash flow information:Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paidInterest paid$415 $176 
Income taxes paidIncome taxes paid$174 $148 
Non-cash investing activities:     Non-cash investing activities:
Property and equipment in liabilities$925
 $802
 $638
Property and equipment in liabilities$4,721 $1,209 
Fair value of intangible assets acquired through acquisition of business (see Note 6)
$
 $8,250
 $
Fair value of contingent consideration liabilities in connection with acquisition of business (see Note 7)
$
 $7,980
 $
Intangible assets in liabilitiesIntangible assets in liabilities$700 $150 
Non-cash financing activities:     Non-cash financing activities:
Settlement of related-party payable to Integra net investment$
 $
 $29,022
Debt issuance cost$
 $
 $328
Supplemental cash flow information:     
Interest paid$373
 $
 $
Income taxes paid (refunded)$89
 $(513) $2,982
Issuance of common stock - AcquisitionIssuance of common stock - Acquisition$61,048 $— 
Exchangeable shares - AcquisitionExchangeable shares - Acquisition$26,505 $— 
Issuance of common stock - Patent AcquisitionIssuance of common stock - Patent Acquisition$500 $— 
Settlement of contingent closing consideration liabilities with stock issuance in connection with acquisition of businessSettlement of contingent closing consideration liabilities with stock issuance in connection with acquisition of business$— $2,000 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F- 7








SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In thousands)

  Common Stock  Additional Integra  Accumulated Other   Total
 Number of    Paid-In Net Comprehensive Accumulated Stockholders'
 Shares  Amount  Capital  Investment Income (Loss) Deficit  Equity
Balance December 31, 2014
 $
 $
 $90,391
 $893
 $
 $91,284
Net loss
 
 
 (27,583) 
 (27,949) (55,532)
Net transfer from Integra
 
 
 107,433
 
 
 107,433
Reclassification of parent company investment in connection with spin-off
 
 170,241
 (170,241)   
 
Foreign currency translation adjustment
 
 
 
 498
 
 498
Issuance of common stock in connection with spin-off11,048
 110
 (110) 
 
 
 
Restricted stock issued66
 1
 (1) 
 
 
 
Restricted stock forfeited(12) 
 
 
 
 
 
Stock-based compensation
 
 3,619
 
 
 
 3,619
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
 
 37
 
 
 
 37
Balance December 31, 201511,102
 $111
 $173,786
 $
 $1,391
 $(27,949) $147,339
Net loss
 
 
 
 
 (43,212) (43,212)
Foreign currency translation adjustment
 
 
 
 (119) 
 (119)
Restricted stock issued79
 1
 (1) 
 
 
 
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan90
 1
 690
 
 
 
 691
Restricted stock forfeited(1) 
 
 
 
 
 
Repurchases of common stock for income tax withheld upon vesting of restricted stock awards(12) 
 (160) 
 
 
 (160)
Stock-based compensation
 
 6,438
 
 
 
 6,438
Balance December 31, 201611,258
 $113
 $180,753
 $
 $1,272
 $(71,161) $110,977
Net loss
 
 
 
 
 (32,115) (32,115)
Foreign currency translation adjustment
 
 
 
 678
 
 678
Restricted stock issued253
 2
 968
     
 970
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan150
 2
 984
 
 
 
 986
Issuance of common stock- NLT Spine Ltd contingent closing consideration350
 3
 2,545
 
 
 
 2,548
Issuance of common stock- ATM transactions1,500
 15
 15,542
 
 
 
 15,557
Issuance of common stock- exercise of stock options5
 
 35
 
 
 
 35
Restricted stock awards forfeited(1) 
 
 
 
 
 
Repurchases of common stock for income tax withheld upon vesting of restricted stock(7) 
 (50) 
 
 
 (50)
Stock-based compensation
 
 6,067
 
 
 
 6,067
Balance December 31, 201713,508
 $135
 $206,844
 $
 $1,950
 $(103,276) $105,653



 Common Stock Additional Accumulated OtherTotal
Number of Paid-InComprehensiveAccumulatedStockholders'
Shares Amount CapitalIncomeDeficit Equity
Balance at December 31, 201919,124��191 284,211 1,434 (176,076)109,760 
Net loss— — — — (43,181)(43,181)
Foreign currency translation adjustment— — — 690 — 690 
Restricted stock issued340 (1)— — 
Issuance of common stock- public offering7,820 78 91,544 — — 91,622 
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan153 1,364 — — 1,366 
Issuance of common stock- NLT Spine Ltd contingent consideration176 1,998 — — 2,000 
Issuance of common stock- exercise of stock options117 1,265 — — 1,266 
Repurchases of common stock for income tax withheld upon vesting of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units(1)— (2,164)— — (2,164)
Stock-based compensation— — 10,357 — — 10,357 
Balance at December 31, 202027,729 277 388,574 2,124 (219,257)171,718 
Net loss(54,346)(54,346)
Foreign currency translation adjustment(554)(554)
Restricted stock issued288 (1)
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan200 1,862 1,864 
Issuance of common stock - Public Offering5,175 52 94,479 94,531 
Issuance of common stock - Acquisition2,991 30 61,018 61,048 
Issuance of common stock - Exchangeable Shares— — 26,505 26,505 
Issuance of common stock- Patent Acquisition33 — 500 500 
Issuance of common stock- exercise of stock options168 2,125 2,127 
Repurchases of common stock for income tax withheld upon vesting of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units— — (2,887)(2,887)
Stock-based compensation11,856 11,856 
Balance at December 31, 202136,584 366 584,031 1,570 (273,603)312,364 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F- 8






SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Business

SeaSpine Holdings Corporation was incorporated in Delaware on February 12, 2015 in connection with the spin-off of the orthobiologics and spinal implant business of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, a diversified medical technology company. The spin-off occurred on July 1, 2015. Unless the context indicates otherwise, (i) references to "SeaSpine" or the "Company" refer to SeaSpine Holdings Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries,subsidiaries.
SeaSpine is a global medical technology company focused on the design, development and (ii) referencescommercialization of surgical solutions for the treatment of patients suffering from spinal disorders. SeaSpine has a comprehensive portfolio of orthobiologics and spinal implant solutions, as well as a surgical navigation system, to "Integra" refermeet the varying combinations of products that neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons need to Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporationperform fusion procedures in the lumbar, thoracic and its subsidiaries other than SeaSpine.

cervical spine. The Company believes this broad combined portfolio of products is essential to meet the “complete solution” requirements of such surgeons.
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The Company’s financial statements are presented on a consolidated basis. The Company prepared the consolidated financial statements included in this report in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP). For periods prior to the spin-off, the Company’s consolidated financial statements were prepared on a stand-alone basis and derived from Integra's consolidated financial statements and accounting records related to its orthobiologics and spinal implant business. The consolidated financial statements include certain assets and liabilities that have historically been held at the Integra level but were specifically identifiable or otherwise attributable to the Company. All significant intra-company transactions within Integra's pre-spin off orthobiologics and spinal implant business have been eliminated. All significant transactions between the Company and other businesses of Integra before the spin-off are included in these consolidated financial statements. See Note 3, “Transactions with Integra,” for further information regarding the relationships the Company has with Integra.

For periods subsequent to the spin-off, the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Under current SEC rules, generally, a company qualifies as a "smaller reporting company" if it has a public float of less than $250 million as of the last business day of its most recently completed second fiscal quarter. If a company qualifies as a smaller reporting company on that date, it may elect to reflect that determination and use the smaller reporting company scaled disclosure accommodations in its subsequent SEC filings until the beginning of the first quarter of the fiscal year following the date it determines it does not qualify as a smaller reporting company. The Company's public float as of June 30, 2020 was less than $250 million, and as such, the Company qualified as a smaller reporting company, elected to reflect that determination and intends to use certain of the scaled disclosure accommodations in its SEC filings made during and for the year ended December 31, 2021. The Company's public float as of June 30, 2021, the last business day of its most recent second fiscal quarter, was more than $250 million, and as such, the Company will no longer qualify as a smaller reporting company as of January 1, 2022. However, the Company is not required to reflect the change in its smaller reporting company status or comply with the non-scaled disclosure obligations until the Company’s first quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2022.


2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates

The preparation ofPreparing consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Significant estimates affecting amounts reported or disclosed in the consolidated financial statements include allowances for doubtful accounts receivable and sales returns and other credits, net realizable value of inventories, discount rates and estimated projected cash flows used to value and test impairments of goodwill, identifiable intangible and long-lived assets, depreciation and amortization periods for identifiable intangible and long-lived assets,fair value estimates related to business combinations, assumptions related to the timing and probability of product launch dates, discount rates matched to the estimated timing of payments, probability of success rates and estimated net salesdiscount adjustments on the related cash flows for contingent considerations in business combinations, depreciation and amortization periods for identifiable intangible and long-lived assets, computation of taxes, valuation allowances recorded against deferred tax assets, the valuation of stock-based compensation and loss contingencies. These estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the current circumstances. Actual results could differ from these estimates.


9

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The full extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic will directly or indirectly impact the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition, including revenues, expenses, manufacturing, research and development costs and employee-related compensation, will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain, including as a result of variants of the virus that causes COVID-19 or other information that may emerge concerning COVID-19 and the actions taken to contain or treat COVID-19, as well as the economic impact on local, regional, national and international customers and markets. The Company has made estimates of the impact of the pandemic within its financial statements and there may be changes to those estimates in future periods. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of 90 days or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include cash readily available in checking and money market accounts.

Cash balances are maintained primarily at major financial institutions in the United States and exceed the regulatory limit of $250,000 insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The Company has not experienced any credit losses associated with its cash balances.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of cash, cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses and short-term debt at December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, are considered to approximate fair value because of the short termshort-term nature of those items.

The Company measures certain assets and liabilities in accordance with authoritative guidance which requires fair value measurements to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

F- 9

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available.

The carrying amount of long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2016 pursuant to the Company’s credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association approximated fair value as interest rates on this instrument approximated the borrowing rates currently available for debt with similar terms and maturities. This fair value measurement is categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The carrying amounts of contingent consideration liabilities at December 31, 20172021 and 2016 pursuant2020 related to the business combinations (see Note 6- Business Combinations) are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, and are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because they use significant unobservable inputs.

Trade Accounts Receivable and Allowances

Trade accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are presented net of allowances for doubtful accounts and sales returns and other credits.Thecredits. The Company grants credit to customers in the normal course of business, but generally does not require collateral or any other security to support its receivables.

The Company evaluates the collectability of accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. In circumstances where a specific customer is unable to meet its financial obligations to the Company, a provision to the allowances for doubtful accounts is recorded to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount that is reasonably expected to be collected. For all other customers, a provision to the allowances for doubtful accounts is recorded based on factors including the length of time the receivables are past due, the current business environment and the Company’s historical experience. Provisions to the allowances for doubtful accounts are recorded to selling, general and administrative expenses. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when it is probable that the receivable will not be recovered.

Inventories

Inventories, consisting of purchased materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead, are stated at the lower of cost, the value determined by the first-in, first-out method, or market.

net realizable value.
At each balance sheet date, the Company evaluates inventories for excess quantities, obsolescence or shelf life expiration. This evaluation includes analysis of the Company's current and future strategic plans, historical sales levels by product, projections of future demand, the risk of technological or competitive obsolescence for products, general market conditions, a review of the shelf life expiration dates for products, as well as the feasibility of reworking or using excess or obsolete products or components in the production or assembly of other products that are not obsolete or for which there are not excess quantities in

10

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
inventory. To the extent that management determines there are excess or obsolete inventory or quantities with a shelf life that is too near its expiration for the Company to reasonably expect that it can sell those products prior to their expiration, the Company adjusts the carrying value to estimated net realizable value.

The Company capitalizes inventory costs associated with certain products prior to regulatory approval, based on management’s judgment of probable economic benefit. The Company could be required to expense previously capitalized costs related to pre-approval inventory upon a change in such judgment, due to, among other potential factors, a denial or delay of approval by necessary regulatory bodies or a decision by management to discontinue the related development program. No suchmaterial amounts were capitalized at December 31, 20172021 or 2016.

2020.
Property, Plant, and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment charges. The
Company provides for depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the lease term or the useful life. The cost of major additions and improvements is capitalized, while maintenance and repair costs that do not improve or extend the lives of the respective assets are charged to operations as incurred. The cost of computer software obtained for internal use is accounted for in accordance with the Accounting Standards Codification 350-40, Internal-Use Software.


F- 10

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

The cost of purchased spinal instruments whichthat the Company consigns to hospitals and independent sales agents to support surgeries is initially capitalized as construction in progress. The amount is then either reclassified to spinal instruments and sets and depreciation is initiated when instruments are put together in a newly built set with spinal implants, or directly expensed for the instruments that are used to replace damaged instruments in an existing set. The depreciation expense and direct expense for replacement instruments are recorded in selling general and administrativemarketing expense.

Leases
The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. The Company's leases primarily relate to administrative, manufacturing, research, and distribution facilities and various manufacturing, office and transportation equipment. Lease assets represent the Company's right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Lease assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As the Company's leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company's incremental borrowing rate is used as a discount rate, based on the information available at the commencement date, in determining the present value of lease payments. Lease assets also include the impact of any prepayments made and are reduced by impact of any lease incentives.
The Company made an accounting policy election for short-term leases, such that the Company will not recognize a lease liability or lease asset on its balance sheet for leases with a lease term of twelve months or less as of the commencement date. Rather, any short-term lease payments will be recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The current period short-term lease expense reasonably reflects the Company's short-term lease commitments.
The Company made a policy election for all classifications of leases to combine lease and non-lease components and to account for them as a single lease component. Variable lease payments are excluded from the lease liability and recognized in the period in which the obligation is incurred. Additionally, lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain the Company will exercise the option.
Business Combinations

The purchase price of eachan acquisition is allocated to the nettangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimates of their estimated fair values at the date ofacquisition date. To the acquisition. Anyextent the purchase price in excess of these net assets is recorded as goodwill, and anyexceeds the fair value of thesethe net identifiable tangible and intangible assets assumed, such excess is allocated to goodwill. The Company determines the estimated fair values after review and consideration of relevant information, including discounted cash flows, quoted market prices and estimates made by management. The Company records the net assets excluding goodwill, in excessand results of the purchase price is recorded as a bargain purchase gain. The allocationoperations of purchase price in certain cases may be subject to revision based on the final determination of fair values during the measurement period, which may be up to one yearan acquired entity from the acquisition date.date impacting asset valuations and liabilities assumed. Acquisition-related costs are recognized separately from the acquisition and are expensed as incurred.


11

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Contingent consideration liability is recognized at the estimated fair value on the acquisition date. Subsequent changes to the fair value of contingent consideration liability are recognized in the statement of operations. Contingent consideration liability related to acquisitions consist of commercial milestone payments and contingent royalty payments, and are valued using discounted cash flow techniques. The fair value of commercial milestone payments and contingent royalty payments reflects management’s expectations of probability and amount of payment, and increases or decreases as the probability and amount of payment or expectation of timing of payment changes.

Identifiable Intangible Assets

IdentifiableUpon acquisition, identifiable intangible assets are initially recorded at fair value and are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The carrying values of intangible assets with finite lives are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the timeexcess of acquisition generally usingthe purchase prices of an income or cost approach.acquired business over the fair value of the underlying net tangible and intangible assets. The Company capitalizes costs incurredis required to renew or extend the term of recognizedassess goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. The Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test. If, after completing the qualitative assessment, it is determined it is more likely than not that the estimated fair value is greater than the carrying value, the Company concludes no impairment exists. Alternatively, if the Company determines in the qualitative assessment it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than its carrying value, then the Company performs a quantitative goodwill impairment test to identify both the existence of an impairment and amortizes those costs overthe amount of impairment loss, by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, then a goodwill impairment charge will be recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The goodwill annual assessment test is performed On October 1st every year or when an event occurs or circumstances change such that it is reasonably possible that an impairment may exist.

The Company assesses qualitative and quantitative factors to determine whether goodwill is impaired. The analysis includes assessing the impact of changes in certain factors including: (1) changes in forecasted operating results and comparing actual results to projections, (2) changes in the industry or our competitive environment since the acquisition date, (3) changes in the overall economy, our market share and market interest rates since the acquisition date, (4) trends in the stock price and related market capitalization and enterprise values, (5) trends in peer companies’ total enterprise value metrics, and (6) additional factors such as management turnover, changes in regulation and changes in litigation matters.

Based on the annual assessment performed during the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company concluded it was more likely than not that the estimated fair value of our reporting units exceeded their expected useful lives.

carrying value as of December 31, 2021, and therefore, determined it was not necessary to perform a quantitative goodwill impairment test.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets held and used by the Company, including property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. For purposes of evaluating the recoverability of long-lived assets to be held and used, a recoverability test is performed using projected undiscounted net cash flows applicable to the long-lived assets. If an impairment exists, the amount of such impairment is calculated based on the estimated fair value of the asset. Impairments to long-lived assets to be disposed of are recorded based upon the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the applicable assets. ThereThe Company determined an impairment existed for certain intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2020. No impairment existed for intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2021. Excluding the impairment of spinal instruments, there was no impairment of intangible or tangible long-lived assets in any of the periods presented. See Note 5, "Balance Sheet Details", below, for additional information.


12

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Foreign Currency

The Company generates revenues outside the United States in multiple foreign currencies including euros, British pounds, Swiss francs, and New Zealand dollars,Canadian dollar and in U.S. dollar-denominated transactions conducted with customers who generate revenue in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The Company also incurs operating expenses in euros.euros, Swiss francs and Canadian dollars. All assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries which have a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar are translated at the rate of exchange at year-end, while elements of the income statement are translated at the average exchange rates in effect during the year. The net effect of these translation adjustments is shown as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).income. These currency translation adjustments are not currently adjusted for income taxes as they relate to permanent investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are reported in other income, (expense), net.

Income Taxes

In the Company’s consolidated financial statements prior to the spin-off, income tax expense and deferred tax balances were calculated on a separate return basis although the Company’s operations had historically been included in the tax returns filed by the respective Integra entities of which the Company’s business was a part.

Prior to the spin-off, the Company maintained an income taxes payable to/from account with Integra. The Company was deemed to settle current tax balances with the Integra tax paying entities in the respective jurisdictions. The Company’s current income tax balances were reflected as income taxes payable and settlements, which are deemed to occur in the year following incurrence, were reflected as changes in net Integra investment in the consolidated balance sheets.

F- 11

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


The Company recognizes tax benefits in its financial statements when its uncertain tax positions are more likely than not to be sustained upon audit. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company recognizes deferred tax assets for deductible temporary differences, operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are reduced by valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Revenue Recognition

Net sales are derived primarily from the sale of orthobiologics and spinal implant and enabling technology products globally. SalesRevenue is recognized when obligations under the terms of a contract with the Company's customer are reported netsatisfied which occurs with the transfer of returns,control of the Company's products. This occurs either upon shipment or delivery of goods, depending on whether the contract is Free on Board (FOB) origin or FOB destination, or, in other situations such as consignment arrangements, when the products are used in a surgical procedure (implanted in a patient) and in the case of capital equipment, when the equipment has been accepted by the customer. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for transferring products to a customer (transaction price).
To the extent that the transaction price includes variable consideration, such as discounts, list price discounts, rebates, group purchasing organization feesvolume discounts and other customer allowances. Allowancespayment penalties, the Company estimates the amount of variable consideration that should be included in the transaction price utilizing the most likely amount method. Variable consideration is included in the transaction price if, in the Company’s judgment, it is probable that a significant future reversal of cumulative revenue under the contract will not occur. Estimates of variable consideration and determination of whether to include estimated amounts in the transaction price are based largely on an assessment of the Company’s anticipated performance and all information (historical, current and forecasted) that is reasonably available.
The Company reduces revenue by estimates of potential future product returns and other creditsallowances. Provisions for product returns and other allowances are recorded as a reduction to revenue in the period sales are recognized. The Company estimates the amount of sales returns and allowances that will eventually be incurred. Certain contracts with stocking distributors contain provisions requiring the Company to repurchase inventory upon termination of the contract or discontinuation of a product line. Included in the sales returns reserve.reserve within other accrued expenses and current liabilities is an estimate of repurchases that are likely to be made under these provisions. Management analyzes sales programs that are in effect, contractual arrangements, market acceptance and historical trends when evaluating the adequacy of sales returns and allowance accounts.

In certain sales arrangements, the Company fulfills its obligations and bills the customer for the products prior to the shipment of goods. The Company allocates the transaction price to the multiple performance obligations under these contracts, including delivery of the products and the third-party logistics (3PL) performance obligations. Revenue related to product sales under these arrangements is not recognized until the Company delivers the products to the customer’s dedicated space within the Company’s facility, at which point the customer obtains control of the products. Revenue from the related 3PL obligations consists of revenue from storage of products which is recognized when persuasive evidenceratably over the service period, and revenue from shipping services which is recognized upon performance of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred title and risk of loss have passedsuch obligation.
Additionally, the Company allocates the transaction price to the customer, there is a fixed or determinable sales price and collectability of that sales price is reasonably assured.

Inmultiple performance obligations under the United States, the Company generates most of its revenue by consigning its orthobiologics products and by consigning or loaning its spinal implant sets to hospitals and independent sales agents, who in turn either deliver them to hospitals for a single surgical procedure, after which they are returnedcontracts related to the Company, or leave them with hospitals that are high volume users for multiple procedures. The spinal implant sets typically containsale of capital equipment, including the instruments, disposables,capital equipment, tools and spinal implants requiredsoftware, the training and installation and the service. Revenue related to complete a surgery. The Company ships replacement inventory to independent sales agents to replace capital equipment, tools and software under these arrangements is recognized upon customer acceptance of

13

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
the consigned inventory used in surgeries. The Company maintainssystem. Revenue from training and replenishes loaned sets at its facilityinstallation is recognized upon completion of the training and returns them to a hospital or independent sales agent forinstallation process. Revenue from service contracts is recognized over the next procedure. The Company recognizes revenue on these consigned or loaned products when they have been used or implanted in a surgical procedure.term of the contract.

For all other sales transactions, including sales to international stocking distributors and private label partners, the Company recognizes revenue when the products are shipped to the customer or stocking distributors andUnder certain contracts, the transfer of titlecapital equipment occurs over time as the customer's purchase commitments on other spinal implant and riskorthobiologics products are met. The Company allocates the transaction price to the multiple performance obligations under these contracts related to the sale of loss occurs. Therethe products (recognized either upon the shipment or delivery of goods, as discussed above), the lease of capital equipment (recognized over the contract period), and of the sale of capital equipment (recognized once the purchase commitments are met).
Deferred revenue primarily consists of payments received in advance of revenue recognition from the sales of the Company's capital equipment and related products as described above and is generally no customer acceptance or other condition that preventsrecognized as the Company from recognizing revenue in accordance with the delivery terms for these sales transactions.

recognition criteria are met.
Product royalties account for less than 1% of total revenue for any of the periods presented, and are estimated and recognized in the same period that the royalty-based products are sold by licensees. The Company estimates and recognizes royalty revenue based upon communication with licensees, historical information and expected sales trends. Differences between actual revenues and estimated royalty revenues are adjusted in the period in which they become known, which is typically the following quarter. Historically, such adjustments have not been material.
See Note 10, "Segment and Geographic Information", below for a presentation of the Company's disaggregated revenue.
Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs


Amounts billedThe Company has elected to customersaccount for shipping and handling are included in revenues. The relatedactivities as fulfillment activities. As such, the Company does not evaluate shipping and freight charges incurred by the Company are included in cost of goods sold.handling as promised services to its customers. Shipping and handling costs of $1.6$3.7 million $1.6 million, and $1.2$2.5 million for product shipments for loaning of loaned spinal implants and instrumentation sets and costs incurred for internal movement of inventory were recorded in selling general and administrativemarketing expense during each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 2015,2020, respectively.

Research and Development

Research and development costs, including salaries, stock-based compensation, depreciation, consultant, clinical study, product registration and other external fees, and facility costs directly attributable to research and development activities, are expensed in the period in which they are incurred.

Stock-Based Compensation
For periods prior to the spin-off, the Company’s stock-based compensation was derived from the equity awards granted by Integra to individuals who would become the Company’s employees. Stock-based compensation expense has been allocated to the Company based on the awards and terms previously granted to its employees. As those stock-based compensation plans were Integra’s plans, the amounts have been recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. For periods after the spin-off, theThe Company's stock-based compensation has been recognized through the consolidated statement of operations and the Company's additional paid-in capital account on the consolidated balance sheet.


F- 12

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

The Company applies the authoritative guidance for stock-based compensation. This guidance requires companies to recognizerecognizes the expense related to the fair value of their stock-based compensation awards. Stock-based compensation expense for stock option awards was based on the fair value on the grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. The fair value of restricted stock granted prior to the spin-off was based on the Integra’s stock price at the grant date, and the fair value of restricted stock granted after the spin-off was based on the Company's stock price at the grant date. The long form method was used in the determination of the windfall tax benefit in accordance with the guidance.

The stock-based compensation is initially measured at the fair value of the awards on the grant date and is then recognized on a ratable basis in the financial statements over the requisite service period of the award. Stock-based compensation expense was $6.1$11.9 million in 2017, $6.42021 and $10.4 million in 2016 and $4.4 million in 2015.2020.


Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash, which is held at major financial institutions, and trade receivables.

The Company’s products are sold on an uncollateralized basis and on credit terms based upon a credit risk assessment of each customer. A portion of the Company’s trade receivables to customers outside the United States includes sales to foreign stocking distributors, who then sell to government owned or supported healthcare systems. The ongoing economic conditions in certain European countries, especially Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain remain uncertain. Accounts receivable from customers in these countries are not a material amount of the Company’s overall receivables.


14

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
None of the Company’s customers accounted for 10% or more of the net sales or accounts receivable for any of the periods presented.
Recent Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

The Company qualifies as an “emerging growth company” (EGC) pursuant to the provisions of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act and elected to take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which permits EGCs to defer compliance with new or revised accounting standards (the EGC extension) until non-issuers are required to comply with such standards. Accordingly, so long as the Company continues to qualify as an EGC, the Company will not have to adopt or comply with new or revised accounting standards until non-issuers are required to adopt or comply with such standards.

In May 2014,June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU or Update) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with
Customers2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 606).326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which requires credit losses on most financial assets measured at amortized cost, including trade receivables, and certain other instruments to be measured using an expected credit loss model, referred to as the current expected credit loss (CECL) model. Under this model, entities will estimate credit losses over the entire contractual term of the instrument. The new standard provideswill be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2022. The FASB subsequently issued other related ASUs that amend ASU No. 2016-13 to provide clarification and additional guidance. The adoption of this new standard is not expected to have a five-step approach tomaterial impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Update No. 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (ASU 2017-04). ASU 2017-04 simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment by removing Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. As a smaller reporting company, as defined by the SEC), ASU 2017-04 is effective for the Company beginning after December 15, 2022 and should be applied on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of ASU 2017-04 will have a material impact on its financial statements for both annual and interim reporting periods, if applicable.
In April 2019, the FASB issued Update No. 2019-04, Codification Improvements to all contracts with customers.Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments. This Update includes several amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) intended to clarify, improve, or correct errors therein. Some amendments do not require transition guidance and are effective upon issuance. The new standard also requires expanded disclosure about revenue recognition. The new standardamendments requiring transition guidance have the same effective date as amended by ASU 2015-14, ASU 2016-10Update No. 2016-13 and ASU 2016-12, will be effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2019, and for interim periods within annual periods beginning on January 1, 2020.2022. The Company performed a preliminary assessment of the impactadoption of this new standard on its consolidated financial statements. In assessing the impact, the Company has outlined all revenue streams, and has considered the five steps outlined in the standard for product sales, from which substantially all the Company's revenue is generated. The Company plans to adopt the new standard using the modified retrospective method. The Company will continue to evaluate the future impact of the new standard.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Update No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The new standard requires lessees to recognize lease liabilities and corresponding right-of-use assets for all leases with lease terms of greater than twelve months. It also changes the definition of a lease and expands the disclosure requirements of lease arrangements. The new standard must be adopted using the modified retrospective approach. The standard will be effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2020, and interim periods within annual periods beginning on January 1, 2021, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not plan to early adopt and expects to apply the transition practical expedients allowed by the standard. Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements provides details on the Company’s current lease arrangements. While the Company continues to evaluate the impact of this new standard on its consolidated financial statements, the Company currently expects the primary impact will be to record right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for existing operating leases in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company does not currently expect the adoption of this new standardexpected to have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations or cash flows.financial statements.

In August 2016,May 2021, the FASB issued Update No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows2021-04, Earnings Per Share (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts260), Debt-Modifications and Cash Payments. This new standard addresses eight specific cash flow issues related to cash receipts and cash payments

F- 13

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

with the objective of reducing the existing diversity of presentation and classification in the statement of cash flows. The new standard will be effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2019, and interim periods within annual periods beginning on January 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted and should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued Update No. 2017-09, Compensation- StockExtinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope, and Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity's Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40) Issuer's Accounting for Certain Modifications or Exchanges of Modification Accounting. The new standard provides guidance regarding which changes to the termsFreestanding Equity-Classified Written Call Options. This Update addresses issuer's accounting for certain modifications or conditionsexchanges of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718.freestanding equity-classified written call options. The new standard will be effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2018, and interim periods within annual periods beginning on January 1, 2018.2022. The adoption of this new standard should be applied prospectivelyis not expected to an award modified on or after the adoption date. The Company is in the process of evaluating thehave a material impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2021, the FASB issued Update No. 2021-05, Leases (Topic 842): Lessors—Certain Leases with Variable Lease Payments. Under this standard, lessors will classify leases with variable payments that do not depend on an index or rate as operating leases if a different classification would result in a commencement date selling loss. The new standard will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2022. The adoption of this new standard is not expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In July 2015,August 2018, the FASB issued Update No. 2015-11, Simplifying2018-15, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal Use Software (Subtopic 350-40). The amendments in this Update align the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330)requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). The new guidance
requires an entity to measure inventory within the scope of the amendment at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The guidancestandard was effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2017, and interim periods within annual periods beginning on January 1, 2018. Adoption2021. The adoption of this new guidance hasstandard had no material impact on the Company’sits consolidated financial statements.

Net Loss Per Share

For periods prior toThe Company follows the spin-off, basic and dilutedtwo-class method when computing net loss per share was calculated basedas the Company's board of directors has discretion in declaring/issuing dividends on the approximately 11.0 million shares of SeaSpineCompany's common stock, that were distributed to Integra shareholders on July 1, 2015.these dividend rights meet the definition for participating securities. Basic and diluted net loss per share was calculated using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstandingduring the period. The weighted average number of shares used to compute diluted net loss per share excludes any assumed issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options, any assumed issuance of common stock under restricted stock awards and units, and any assumed issuances under the Company's 2015 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as the effect, in each case, would be antidilutive. Common stock equivalents of 3.3 million, 3.1 million and 2.0 million shares for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, were excluded from the calculation because of their antidilutive effect.

3. TRANSACTIONS WITH INTEGRA
Related-party Transactions
Prior to the spin-off, and pursuant to certain supply agreements subsequent to the spin-off, SeaSpine purchased a portion of raw materials and finished goods from Integra for SeaSpine's Mozaik family of products, and SeaSpine contract manufactured certain finished goods for Integra.The Company's purchases of raw materials and Mozaik product finished goods from Integra for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 totaled $0.6 million, $1.1 million and $6.2 million, respectively. The Company's sale of finished goods to Integra under its contract manufacturing arrangement for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 totaled $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively, and was immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Pursuant to a transition services agreement, Integra and SeaSpine provided certain services to one another following the spin-off, and Integra and SeaSpine agreed to indemnify each other against certain liabilities arising from their respective businesses. Under this agreement, Integra provided the Company with certain support functions, including information technology, accounting and other financial functions, regulatory affairs and quality assurance, human resources and other administrative support. The Company incurred no costs under the agreement for the year ended December 31, 2017, and approximately $0.3 million and $2.8 million of costs for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Allocated Costs
For periods prior to the spin-off, the consolidated statements of operations included direct expenses for cost of goods sold, research and development, sales and marketing, customer service, and administration as well as allocations of expenses arising from shared services and infrastructure provided by Integra to the Company, such as costs of information technology, including the costs of a multi-year global enterprise resource planning implementation, accounting and legal services, real estate and facilities management, corporate advertising, insurance and treasury services, and other corporate and infrastructure services. These allocations are included in the table below. These expenses were allocated to the Company using estimates that the Company considers to be a reasonable reflection of the utilization of services provided to or benefits received from the Company. The allocation methods include pro-rata basis of revenue, standard cost of sales or other measures. There were no

F- 14

15

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

allocated costsunder restricted stock awards or units, and any assumed issuances under the Company's employee stock purchase plan, because the effect, in each case, would be antidilutive. Common stock equivalents, including the Exchangeable Shares (as defined below), of 6.3 million and 4.2 million shares for each of the years ended December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020, respectively, were excluded from the calculation because of their antidilutive effect.

3. BUSINESS ACQUISITION
  Year Ended December 31,
  2015
 (In thousands)
Cost of goods sold $488
Selling, general and administrative 8,633
Research and development 253
Total Allocated Costs $9,374
7D Surgical Acquisition
IncludedIn March 2021, the Company entered into an arrangement agreement (the Arrangement Agreement) with 7D Surgical, Project Maple Leaf Acquisition ULC, an unlimited liability company incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (Purchaser Sub), and Michael Cadotte and Joel Rose, as the 7D Surgical shareholders’ representatives.
On May 20, 2021, the acquisition contemplated by the Arrangement Agreement was consummated by way of a court-approved plan of arrangement under Ontario law (Plan of Arrangement) in which Purchaser Sub acquired all outstanding shares of 7D Surgical, including those 7D Surgical shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options, and 7D Surgical became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the Acquisition).
Pursuant to the Arrangement Agreement and the Plan of Arrangement, the Company acquired 7D Surgical for a total purchase price consisting of $27.5 million in cash plus an additional $5.6 million for adjustments as provided for in the above amountsArrangement Agreement for 7D Surgical closing cash, working capital and net indebtedness, 2,991,054 shares of the Company’s common stock (the Company Shares) and 1,298,648 Exchangeable Shares (as defined below). Pursuant to the Arrangement Agreement, Canadian-resident 7D Surgical shareholders could elect to receive, in lieu of their portion of the Company Shares, an equivalent number of Class B common shares of Purchaser Sub (the Exchangeable Shares), which are exchangeable on a 1:1 basis for shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to customary adjustments. The Company may require all outstanding Exchangeable Shares to be exchanged upon the occurrence of certain non-cashevents and at any time following the fifth anniversary of the closing date of the Acquisition. While outstanding, holders of Exchangeable Shares will be entitled to receive dividends economically equivalent to the dividends declared by the Company with respect to its common stock, but will not be entitled to cast votes on matters for which holders of the Company’s common stock are entitled to vote.

The Company Shares and the Exchangeable Shares were issued in connection with the consummation of the Plan of Arrangement pursuant to the exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), provided by Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act based on the final order of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice issued in May 2021, approving the Plan of Arrangement following a hearing by the court upon the fairness of the terms and conditions on which all persons to whom it is proposed the securities will be issued had the right to appear. The Company agreed to register for resale all shares of Company common stock issuable in exchange for the Exchangeable Shares on a registration statement to be effective within ninety days of the closing date of the Acquisition.

This acquisition was treated as a business combination and the consideration transferred was allocated to the fair value of 7D Surgical's assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including identifiable intangible assets. The acquisition was treated as an asset purchase for US taxation and is treated as a stock purchase for Canadian taxation. The fair value of consideration transferred consisted of the following:

Fair Value
(In thousands)
Common stock issued$61,048 
Exchangeable shares26,505 
Cash33,082 
$120,635 

The Company incurred $2.3 million of transactions costs including stock-based compensation. Such amounts were $0.6 milliondirectly related to the acquisition that is reflected in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.


16

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table summarizes the final consideration paid and related fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Acquisition:

 Fair Value
(In thousands)
Cash$5,126 
Accounts receivable2,460 
Inventory2,061 
Other current assets1,171 
Property & equipment715 
Identifiable intangible assets:
Patents & Technology31,000 
Trademarks & Tradenames1,300 
Goodwill84,595 
Other assets161 
Deferred tax liability, net(5,598)
Liabilities assumed(2,356)
$120,635 

Goodwill from the acquisition primarily relates to the future economic benefits arising from the assets acquired and is consistent with the Company's stated intentions and strategy. For US tax purposes, the Goodwill will be deductible under IRC section 197 since the transaction was treated as an asset purchase.For Canadian tax purposes, the Goodwill will not be deductible since the transaction was treated a stock purchase.

The Company's results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015.
All significant related party transactions between SeaSpine2021 included the operating results of 7D Surgical of $6.3 million of revenue and Integra were includeda net loss of $5.3 million in the consolidated statements of operations.

Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information

The following unaudited pro forma financial statements and, prior toinformation summarizes the spin-off,combined results of operations as though the companies were considered to be effectively settled for cash at the time the transaction was recorded, with the exceptioncombined as of the purchases by SeaSpine from Integrabeginning of Mozaik raw materials and finished goods, and fees incurred pursuant to the transition services agreement2020:
December 31,
20212020
 (In thousands)
Total Revenue, net$195,488 $162,468 
Net Loss$(58,624)$(46,100)

The unaudited pro forma financial information for all periods presented. The total net effectpresented above has been calculated after adjusting the results to reflect the business combination accounting effects resulting from this acquisition, including the amortization expense from acquired intangible assets as though the acquisition occurred as of the transactions considered to be effectively settled for cash was reflectedbeginning of 2020. The Company's historical consolidated financial statements have been adjusted in the consolidated statement of cash flows as a financing activity.
pro forma financial information to give effect to pro forma events that are directly attributable to the business combination and factually supportable. The following table summarizes the componentsunaudited pro forma financial information is for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the net decrease in Integra net investment forresults of operations that would have been achieved if the year ended December 31, 2015. The Integra net investment was reclassified to Additional Paid-in Capital in connection withacquisition had taken place at the spin-off.beginning of 2020.


17

  Year Ended December 31,
  2015
  (In thousands)
Cash pooling and general financing activities (a) $68,386
Corporate Allocations (excluding non-cash adjustments) 8,787
Total Integra net investment in financing activities within cash flow statement 77,173
Non-cash adjustments (b) 29,806
Spin-off related adjustment (c) 161
Reclassification of Integra net investment in connection with the spin-off (170,241)
Foreign exchange impact 293
Net decrease in Integra investment $(62,808)
SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(a)Includes financing activities for capital transfers, cash sweeps and other treasury services.
(b)Reflects allocation of non-cash charges from Integra, stock-based compensation and settlement of related-party payable to Integra net investment.
(c)During the year ended December 31, 2015, certain spin-off related adjustments were recorded in stockholders' equity, to reflect the appropriate opening balances related to SeaSpine’s legal entities on July 1, 2015, which was the date when SeaSpine became a separate, independent, publicly-traded company.

4. DEBT AND INTEREST
Credit Agreement
In December 2015, the Company entered into a three-year credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association which was subsequently amended in October 2016 to address the Company's acquisition of certain assets of NLT (as described in Note 6, "Business Combinations," below) (as amended, the Credit Facility). The Credit Facility provides an asset-backed revolving line of credit of up to $30.0 million in borrowing capacity with a maturity date of December 24, 2018,July 27, 2021, which maturity date iswas subject to a one-time,1-time, one-year extension at the Company's election. In July 2021, the Company elected to extend the term of the Credit Facility such that the maturity date is now July 27, 2022. In addition, under the Credit Facility, at any time through July 27, 2021, the Company could have increased the $30.0 million borrowing limit by up to an additional $10.0 million, subject to the Company having sufficient amounts of eligible accounts receivable and inventory and to customary conditions precedent, including obtaining the commitment of lenders to provide such additional amount. The Company did not elect to increase the borrowing limit. In connection with entering into the Credit Facility, the Company was required to become a guarantor and to provide a security interest in substantially all its assets for the benefit of the counterparty.

There were no amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility at December 31, 2021 or 2020. In March 2021, the Company borrowed $20.0 million under the Credit Facility. As of March 31, 2021, the effective interest rate on the amounts borrowed was 4.50%. In April 2021, the Company repaid the entire $20.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility. At December 31, 2021, the Company had $26.4 million of current borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility before the requirement to maintain the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio as discussed below. Debt issuance costs and legal fees related to the Credit Facility totaling $0.6 million were recorded as a deferred asset and are being amortized ratably over the term of the arrangement.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility accrue interest at the rate then applicable to base rate loans (as customarily defined), unless and until converted into LIBOR rate loans (as customarily defined) in accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility. Borrowings bear interest at a floating annual rate equal to (a) during any month for which the Company's average excess availability (as

F- 15

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

customarily defined) is greater than $20.0 million, (i) base rate plus 1.25 percentage points for base rate loans and (ii) LIBOR rate plus 2.25 percentage points for LIBOR rate loans, (b) during any month for which the Company's average excess availability is greater than $10.0 million but less than or equal to $20.0 million, (i) base rate plus 1.50 percentage points for base rate loans and (ii) LIBOR rate plus 2.50 percentage points for LIBOR rate loans and (c) during any month for which the Company's average excess availability is less than or equal to $10.0 million, (i) base rate plus 1.75 percentage points for base rate loans and (ii) LIBOR rate plus 2.75 percentage points for LIBOR rate loans. The Company will also paypays an unused line fee in anbased on the average amount borrowed under the Credit Facility for the most recently completed month. If such average amount is 25% or greater of the maximum borrowing capacity, the unused fee will be equal to 0.375% per annum of the amount unused under the Credit Facility, amount.and if such average amount is less than 25%, the unused line fee will be equal to 0.50% per annum of the amount unused under the Credit Facility. The unused line fee is due and payable on the first day of each month.

In September 2016, the Company borrowed $3.3 million under the Credit Facility. The Company elected to have the LIBOR rate apply to the amount borrowed with an interest period of six months commencing on September 28, 2016, which was further extended for another interest period of six months commencing on March 28, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company paid off the entire amount borrowed plus accrued interest, totaling $4.1 million. There were no amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility at December 31, 2017, and $3.8 million outstanding at December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2017, the Company had $20.5 million of current borrowing capacity thereunder. Debt issuance costs and legal fees related to the Credit Facility totaling $0.4 million were recorded as a deferred asset and are being amortized ratably over the term of the arrangement.

The Credit Facility contains various customary affirmative and negative covenants, including prohibiting the Company from incurring indebtedness without the lender’s consent. The Credit Facility also includes a financial covenant, that requires the Company to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.10 to 1.00 for the applicable measurement period, if the Company's Total Liquidity (as defined in the Credit Facility) is less than $5.0 million. The Company was in compliance with all applicable covenants at December 31, 2017.

2021.
The Credit Facility also includes customary events of default, including events of default relating to non-payment of amounts due under the Credit Facility, material inaccuracy of representations and warranties, violation of covenants, bankruptcy and insolvency, failure to comply with health care laws, violation of certain of the Company’s existing agreements, and the occurrence of a change of control. Under the Credit Facility, if an event of default occurs, the lender will have the right to terminate the commitments and accelerate the maturity of any loans outstanding.

Insurance Premium Finance Agreements

Paycheck Protection Program
In July 2016,April 2020, due to the Company entered into two insurance premium finance agreements (the Finance Agreements) with First Insurance Funding Corporation and AFCO Acceptance Corporation (the Lenders), under whicheconomic uncertainty resulting from the Lenders agreed to pay premiums, taxes and fees to insurance companiesimpact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company's behalfoperations and to support its ongoing operations and retain all employees, the Company applied for various insurance policies. The Company financed an aggregate of $1.2 milliona loan under the Finance Agreements with annual interest rates between 2%Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and 4%Economic Security Act (CARES Act). The Company recordedreceived a loan in the total amounts due to the Lenders as short-term debt on the balance sheet. At June 30, 2017, the financedoriginal principal amount plus accrued interest was paid off and no amounts were outstanding under the Finance Agreements, and no additional amounts have been financed under the Finance Agreements since then. There were no amounts outstanding under the Finance Agreements at December 31, 2017, and $0.4of $7.2 million. The Company subsequently repaid $1.0 million outstanding at December 31, 2016.
5. BALANCE SHEET DETAILS

Inventories. Inventories consisted of the following:

December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
 (In thousands)
Finished goods$31,008
 $30,922
Work in process6,909
 10,554
Raw materials3,804
 3,823
 $41,721
 $45,299


loan. Under the terms of the PPP, subject to specified limitations, the loan may be forgiven if the proceeds are used in accordance with the CARES Act. The Company used the loan proceeds for purposes consistent with the terms of the PPP and applied for
F- 16

18

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

forgiveness of the entire $6.2 million loan balance, which was granted in June 2021. The $6.2 million gain on the loan forgiveness is included in other income, net, in the consolidated statement of operations. There are no amounts outstanding under the loan at December 31, 2021. The loan is subject to audit by the Small Business Association (SBA) for up to six years after the date of loan forgiveness. Should the SBA determine that the Company did not qualify for all or part of the loan, the Company would need to repay all or a part of the loan.


5. BALANCE SHEET DETAILS

Inventories.

Inventories consisted of:
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
 (In thousands)
Finished goods$49,405 $37,689 
Work in process17,644 10,087 
Raw materials5,250 6,265 
$72,299 $54,041 

Property, Plant and Equipment.

Property, plant and equipment netbalances and corresponding useful lives were as follows:
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 Useful Lives
 (In thousands)  
Leasehold improvement$5,312
 $5,003
 Lease term
Machinery and production equipment7,030
 6,826
 3-10 years
Spinal instruments and sets20,340
 26,618
 5 years
Information systems and hardware7,375
 6,918
 3-7 years
Furniture and fixtures991
 1,058
 3-5 years
Construction in progress8,136
 7,828
  
     Total49,184
 54,251
  
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization(27,121) (32,388)  
Property, plant and equipment, net$22,063
 $21,863
  

The balance of construction in progress as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 consists primarily of spinal instruments that are not yet placed into service.
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020Useful Lives
 (In thousands)
Leasehold improvements$6,501 $5,976 Shorter of lease term or useful life
Machinery and production equipment10,408 9,577 3-10 years
Spinal instruments and sets45,076 30,275 4-6 years
Information systems and hardware8,186 7,554 3-7 years
Furniture and fixtures2,097 1,640 3-5 years
Construction in progress17,615 12,645 
     Total89,883 67,667 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization(42,991)(36,245) 
Property, plant and equipment, net$46,892 $31,422 
Depreciation and amortization expenses totaled $4.1 million, $4.5$7.9 million and $4.5$6.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021 and 2015,2020, respectively, and included $0.8$1.0 million $1.2 million and $0.3 millionof expenses that were presented within cost of goods sold for 2017, 2016the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. The cost of purchased instruments used to replace damaged instruments in existing sets and recorded directly to the instrument replacement expense totaled $1.8 million, $1.4$3.9 million and $1.2$2.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 2015,2020, respectively.

Identifiable Intangible Assets.
ForPrimarily as a result of an expected shift in future product revenue mix more toward a parallel expanding interbody device based on the years ended December 31, 2016Company’s internally developed technology and, 2015,in turn, lower future revenue anticipated for the lordotic expanding implant based on technology the Company recorded impairment charges totaling $0.9acquired from N.L.T. Spine Ltd. (NLT) and NLT Spine, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of NLT, the Company's estimated future net sales associated with those NLT product technologies decreased. Accordingly, the Company evaluated the ongoing value of the product technology intangible assets associated with the acquisition of these assets. Based on this evaluation, the Company determined that intangible assets with a carrying amount of $1.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively, against spinal instruments that arewere no longer expectedrecoverable and were impaired, and the Company wrote those intangible assets down to be placed into service. No impairment charges against spinal instruments were recorded fortheir

19

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
estimated fair value of $0.3 million at March 31, 2020. During the year ended December 31, 2017.2021, there were no asset impairments.

Significant estimates used in determining the estimated fair value include measurements estimating cash flows and determining the appropriate discount rate, which are considered Level 3 inputs under Codification 820.
Identifiable Intangible Assets. During the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized $1.8 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of product technology intangible assets related to the achievement of certain licensed technology development milestones under a license agreement.
The components of the Company’s identifiable intangible assets were as follows:were: 
 December 31, 2021
 Weighted
Average
Life
CostAccumulated
Amortization
Net
 (In thousands)
Product technology12 years$65,642 $(32,484)$33,158 
Customer relationships12 years56,830 (49,241)7,589 
Trademarks/brand names6 years1,600 (438)1,162 
Other intangibles8 years159 (12)147 
$124,231 $(82,175)$42,056 
 December 31, 2017
 
Weighted
Average
Life
 Cost 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Net
   (In thousands)
Product technology12 years $40,769
 $(25,827) $14,942
Customer relationships12 years 56,830
 (36,565) 20,265
Trademarks/brand names 300
 (300) 
   $97,899
 $(62,692) $35,207

December 31, 2016 December 31, 2020
Weighted
Average
Life
 Cost 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Net Weighted
Average
Life
CostAccumulated
Amortization
Net
 (In thousands) (In thousands)
Product technology12 years $40,569
 $(22,218) $18,351
Product technology12 years$32,891 $(29,766)$3,125 
Customer relationships12 years 56,830
 (33,396) 23,434
Customer relationships12 years56,830 (46,072)10,758 
Trademarks/brand names 300
 (300) 
Trademarks/brand names300 (300)— 
Other intangiblesOther intangibles$— $— $— 
 $97,699
 $(55,914) $41,785
$90,021 $(76,138)$13,883 
Annual amortization expense (including amounts reported in cost of goods sold) is expected to be approximately, $6.5$7.2 million in 2018, $5.82022, $6.6 million in 2019, $4.92023, $4.6 million in 2020, $4.92024, $3.3 million in 2021,2025, and $4.8$3.3 million in 2022.2026. Amortization expense totaled $6.8 million, $7.2$6.0 million and $8.0$4.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 2015,2020, respectively, and included $3.6 million, $2.9$2.7 million and $2.7$1.0 million, respectively, of amortization of product technology intangible assets that was presented within cost of goods sold.

The Company assesses qualitative and quantitative factors to determine whether goodwill is impaired. The analysis includes assessing the impact of changes in certain factors including: (1) changes in forecasted operating results and comparing actual results to projections, (2) changes in the industry or our competitive environment since the acquisition date, (3) changes in the overall economy, our market share and market interest rates since the acquisition date, (4) trends in the stock price and related market capitalization and enterprise values, (5) trends in peer companies’ total enterprise value metrics, and (6) additional factors such as management turnover, changes in regulation and changes in litigation matters.
F- 17

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

6. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

In August 2016,Based on the annual assessment performed On October 1, 2021, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with N.L.T Spine Ltd. (NLT), and NLT Spine, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of NLT, pursuant to which the Company agreed to purchase certain of the assets of NLT’s medical device business, including substantially all of NLT’s medical device intellectual property related to the ownership, design, development, manufacture, marketing and commercial exploitation of certain expandable interbody devices. The acquisitionconcluded it was undertaken to increase the Company's product offering in expandable interbody devices.

At the initial closing under the asset purchase agreement, the Company entered into (i) an exclusive license agreement with NLT, pursuant to which the Company received an exclusive, worldwide license to make, use, import, offer for sale, sell and otherwise commercially exploit NLT’s expandable interbody device products , (ii) a transition services agreement with NLT, pursuant to which NLT agreed to provide certain services with respect to the continued development of the acquired intellectual property and (iii) a non-competition and non-solicitation agreement with NLT, pursuant to which NLT and its affiliates agreedmore likely than not to compete with the Company with respect to the acquired intellectual property, subject to certain exceptions.

The purchase price consisted of an initial cash payment to NLT of $1.0 million, which was paid in September 2016 upon the initial closing, and the issuance in January 2017 of 350,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a total fair value of $2.5 million at issuance as contingent closing consideration upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, including FDA 510(K) clearance of one of the acquired product technologies. In accordance with the terms of the asset purchase agreement, the number of shares issued was determined based on the volume weighted average closing price (VWAP) of the Company's common stock during the 20 trading day period ending one trading day prior to the issuance date, subject to a minimum and maximum VWAP of $10.00 and $17.00, respectively. The VWAP over such 20-trading day period was $7.58 and therefore $10.00 was used.

The Company is also obligated to pay up to a maximum of $5.0 million in milestone payments, payable at the Company's election in cash or in shares of its common stock, which are contingent on the Company's achievement of four independent events related to the commercialization of the acquired product technologies. Additionally, the Company is required to pay royalty payments, in cash, to NLT equal to declining (over time) percentages of the Company’s future net sales of certain of the acquired product technologies not to exceed $43.0 million in the aggregate. The Company has the option to terminate any future obligation to make royalty payments by making a one-time cash payment to NLT of $18.0 million.

The Company accounted for this transaction as a business combination in accordance with ASC 805 Business Combinations, and as such, the assets acquired have been recorded at their respective fair values. There were no liabilities assumed. The determination of fair value for the identifiable intangible assets acquired requires extensive use of estimates and judgments. Significant estimates include estimating cash flows and determining the appropriate discount rate, which are considered significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) under the fair value concepts defined in ASC 820. Intangible assets acquired were valued at $9.3 million as of the initial closing date and recorded as product technology intangible assets, which are being amortized ratably over a useful life of 10 years from the initial closing. Acquisition costs of $0.5 million incurred were recorded as selling, marketing and administrative expenses.

The following table summarizesthat the estimated fair value of total considerationour reporting units exceeded their carrying value, and therefore, determined it was not necessary to be paid to NLT as of September 26, 2016, the date of the initial closing. The Company estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration, including contingent milestone payments and contingent royalty payments, usingperform a probability weighted approach that considers the possible outcomes based on assumptions related to the timing and probability of the product launch dates, discount rates matched to the timing of payments, and probability of success rates and discount adjustments on the related cash flows. Subsequent to the acquisition date, at each reporting period, the contingent consideration liabilities will be remeasured at current fair value with changes to be recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. The total purchase price was allocated entirely to product technology intangible asset.quantitative goodwill impairment test.


20
 (In thousands) 
Cash paid for purchase$1,000
Contingent closing consideration2,930
Contingent milestone payments2,310
Contingent royalty payments3,010
Total purchase price$9,250

The unaudited pro forma financial information set forth below assumes that the NLT purchased assets had been acquired on January 1, 2015. The unaudited pro forma financial information includes the effect of estimated amortization charges for acquired intangible

F- 18

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

assets of $0.9 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the estimated research and development expenses for the purchased assets of $1.1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, and excludes the non-recurring acquisition costs of $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. There was no adjustment to the total revenues. The unaudited pro forma information is presented for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of the periods presented.

The actual amortization charges for acquired intangible assets and research and development expenses for the purchased assets are included in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017, and therefore no adjustment was made to such statement.
  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015
 (In thousands, except per share data)   
Operating loss $(45,063) $(54,196)
Net loss (44,775) (57,552)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted $(3.99) $(5.17)
Weighted average shares used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share 11,222
 11,139


F- 19

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The fair values of the Company’s assets and liabilities, including contingent consideration liabilities, are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, and are determined under the fair value categories as follows (in thousands):
  Total Quoted Price in Active Market (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
December 31, 2017:        
    Contingent consideration liabilities- current $207
 $
 $
 $207
    Contingent consideration liabilities- non-current 4,228
 
 
 4,228
Total contingent consideration $4,435
 $
 $
 $4,435
  Total Quoted Price in Active Market (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
December 31, 2016:        
    Contingent consideration liabilities- current $2,855
 $
 $
 $2,855
    Contingent consideration liabilities- non-current 5,125
 
 
 5,125
Total contingent consideration $7,980
 $
 $
 $7,980

Contingent consideration liabilities are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because they use significant unobservable inputs. For those liabilities, fair value is determined using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model and significant inputs which are not observable in the market. The significant inputs include assumptions related to the timing and probability of the product launch dates, discount rates matched to the timing of payments, and probability of success rates.

The following table sets forth the changes in the estimated fair value of the Company’s liabilities measured on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. The gain from change in fair value of contingent closing consideration is the difference between the fair value of shares expected to be issued to NLT based on assumptions as of December 31, 2016, including the forecasted issuance date and stock price and the fair value of the shares actually issued to NLT on January 31, 2017. The gain from change in fair value of contingent milestone and royalty payments resulted from updated estimated timing of payments, probability of success rates, the passage of time, updated discount rates matched to the estimated timing of payments, actual net sales of certain products for the year ended December 31, 2017, and lower estimated net sales for future royalty payment periods.

A change in estimated timing of payments, probability of success rates, or estimated net sales for future royalty payment periods would be expected to have a material impact on the fair value of contingent milestone and royalty payments.
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016
  (in thousands)
Beginning Balance as of January 1 $7,980
 $
    Contingent consideration liabilities assumed (settled) (2,570) 8,250
    Gain from change in fair value of contingent closing consideration recorded in other income

 (112) (270)
    Gain from change in fair value of contingent milestone and royalty payments recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses
    
 (863) 
Ending Balance as of December 31 $4,435
 $7,980

8.6. EQUITY AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Common Stock

On January 31, 2017,In July 2020 and August 2020, the Company issued 350,000100,100 shares and 75,585 shares of its common stock to NLT, respectively, as the settlement of contingent closing considerationmilestone payments pursuant to the terms of the asset purchase agreement entered into with NLT in August 2016. The total fair value of such shares was $2.5 million at issuance. See Note 6, "Business Combinations"5, "Fair Value Measurements" above.


F- 20

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

In August 2016,January 2020, the Company entered into an equity distribution agreement (Distribution Agreement)Underwriting Agreement with Piper JaffraySandler & Co. (Piper Jaffray),and Canaccord Genuity LLC relating to the issuance and sale of 6,800,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price to the public of $12.50 per share, before underwriting discounts and commissions. Under the terms of that agreement, the Company granted the underwriters an option, exercisable for 30 days, to purchase up to an additional 1,020,000 shares of common stock. The underwriters exercised this option and the offering closed on January 10, 2020 with the sale of 7,820,000 shares of common stock, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $92 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by the Company. The offering was made pursuant to which the Company may offer and sell shares of its common stock in “at the market” (ATM) offerings (as defined in Rule 415 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) having an aggregate offering price up to $25.0 million in gross proceeds from time to time through Piper Jaffray acting as sales agent. The shares offered and sold under the Distribution Agreement are covered by aCompany’s shelf registration statement on Form S-3 that was declared effective on August 24, 2016.May 22, 2019.
In April 2021, the Company entered into an Underwriting Agreement with Piper Sandler & Co., Canaccord Genuity LLC, and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated relating to the issuance and sale of 4,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock at a price to the public of $19.50 per share, before underwriting discounts and commissions. Under the Distribution Agreement,terms of that agreement, the Company sold 1,500,000granted the underwriters an option, exercisable for 30 days, to purchase up to an additional 675,000 shares of common stock. The underwriters exercised this option and the offering closed on April 20, 2021 with the sale of 5,175,000 shares of common stock, at an average price per share of $10.78 and receivedresulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $15.6$95 million, (net of $0.6 million ofafter deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering costs) duringexpenses payable by the year ended December 31, 2017.Company. The Company intends to useused a portion of the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, including paying downfrom the offering to repay all of its outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility sales and marketing expenditures aimed at growing its business, and research and development expenditures focused on product development.to finance the cash consideration of $27.5 million for the Company's acquisition of 7D Surgical.

Subsequent to December 31, 2017,In May 2021, the Company sold an additional 882,332issued 2,991,054 shares of the Company’s common stock at an average price per shareand 1,298,648 Exchangeable Shares in connection with Company's acquisition of $10.00 and received net proceeds of approximately $8.6 million (net of $0.2 million offering costs), which consumed the remaining capacity under the Distribution Agreement.

7D Surgical.
Equity Award Plans

Stock-based compensation expense, all related to employees and non-employee directors, was recognized as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 20212020
 (In Thousands)
Selling and marketing$2,808 2,530 
General and administrative6,686 $5,607 
Research and development2,041 1,831 
Cost of goods sold321 389 
Total stock-based compensation expense11,856 10,357 
  December 31
  2017 2016 2015
  (In Thousands)
Selling, general and administrative $5,136
 $5,378
 $3,993
Research and development 790
 783
 242
Cost of goods sold 141
 277
 168
Total stock-based compensation expense 6,067
 6,438
 4,403
Total estimated tax benefit related to stock-based compensation expense 
 
 37
Net effect on net income $6,067
 $6,438
 $4,366

As of June 30, 2015, Integra had stock options, restricted stock awards, performance stock awards, contract stock awardsNo estimated tax benefit related to stock-based compensation expense was recognized for the years ended December 31, 2021 and restricted stock units outstanding under three plans, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, and the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan. In connection with the spin-off, Integra equity awards granted to individuals who became employees of SeaSpine were converted to equity awards denominated in SeaSpine common stock. In general, each post-conversion award is subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable to the pre-conversion award.2020.
In May 2015, the Company adopted the 2015 Incentive Award Plan, which was subsequently amended and restated with approval of the Company's stockholders. In February and March 2018, the Company's board of directors approved amendments to the plan that increased the share reserve by an aggregate of 2,726,000 shares over the then-existing share reserve thereunder, subject to stockholder approval. The Company's stockholders (asapproved both amendments in May 2018. In April 2020, the Company's board of directors approved an amendment to the plan that, among other things, increased the share reserve by an aggregate of 3,500,000 shares over the then-existing share reserve thereunder, subject to stockholder approval. The Company's stockholders approved the amendment in June 2020 (the 2015 Incentive Award Plan, as amended and restated to date, the 2015Restated Plan). Under the 2015Restated Plan, the Company can grant its employees, non-employee directors and consultants incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, performance stock, dividend equivalent rights, stock appreciation rights, stock payment awards and other incentive awards. The Companyaggregate number of shares that may issue upbe issued or transferred pursuant to 3,786,643awards under the Restated Plan is the sum of (1) the number of shares issuable upon exercise or vesting

21

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
of the equity awards issued by the Company's former parent company prior to the spin-off that were converted into the Company's equity awards under the Restated Plan as of the date of the spin-off and (2) 9,735,500 shares of itsthe Company common stock in respect of awards granted under the 2015Restated Plan. As of December 31, 2017, there2021, 3,005,875 shares were 346,604 shares available to grantfor issuance under the 2015Restated Plan.

In 2016,June 2018, the Company established the 20162018 Employment Inducement Incentive Award Plan (the 20162018 Inducement Plan). The plan is a broad-basedterms of the 2018 Inducement Plan are substantially similar to the terms of the Restated Plan with these principal exceptions: (1) incentive plan which allows for the issuance of stock-based awards, including non-qualified stock options restricted stockmay not be granted under the 2018 Inducement Plan; (2) there are no annual limits on awards performancethat may be issued to an individual under the 2018 Inducement Plan; (3) awards restricted stock unit awards and stock appreciation rights,granted under the 2018 Inducement Plan are not required to be subject to any prospective officer or otherminimum vesting period; and (4) awards may be granted under the 2018 Inducement Plan only to those individuals and in those circumstances described below. An aggregate of 2,000,000 shares are reserved under the 2018 Inducement Plan. As of December 31, 2021, 1,926,740 shares were available for issuance under the 2018 Inducement Plan. As a result of the approval of the amendment to the Restated Plan by the Company's stockholders in June 2020, no awards will be granted under the 2018 Inducement Plan in the future.
In August 2020, the Company adopted the 2020 Employment Inducement Incentive Award Plan (the 2020 Inducement Plan). The terms of the 2020 Inducement Plan are substantially similar to the terms of the Restated Plan with four principal exceptions: (1) incentive stock options may not be granted under the 2020 Inducement Plan; (2) there are no annual limits on awards that may be issued to an individual under the 2020 Inducement Plan; (3) awards granted under the 2020 Inducement Plan are not required to be subject to any minimum vesting period; and (4) awards may be granted under the 2020 Inducement Plan only to those individuals and in those circumstances described below. An aggregate of 2,000,000 shares are reserved under the 2020 Inducement Plan. As of December 31, 2021, 1,339,294 share were available for issuance under the 2020 Inducement Plan.
Both the 2018 Inducement Plan and the 2020 Inducement Plan were adopted by the Company’s board of directors without stockholder approval pursuant to Rule 5635(c)(4) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules. In accordance with Rule 5635(c)(4) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules, awards under those plans may only be made to an employee who has not previously been an employee or directormember of SeaSpinethe Company's board of directors or an affiliateof any board of directors of any parent or who is commencing employment with SeaSpinesubsidiary of the Company, or an affiliate following a bona-fidebona fide period of non-employment by SeaSpinethe Company or a parent or subsidiary, if he or she is granted such award in connection with his or her commencement of employment with the Company or a subsidiary and such grant is an affiliate. An aggregate of 1,000,000 shares are reserved for issuance underinducement material to his or her entering into employment with the 2016 Plan. The Company has not awarded any shares under the 2016 Plan as of December 31, 2017.

or such subsidiary.
Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Units
Restricted stock award and restricted stock unit grants to employees generally have a requisite service period of three years, and restricted stock award and restricted stock unit grants to non-employee directors generally have a requisite service period of one year. Both are subject to graded vesting. The Company expenses the fair value of restricted stock awards and of restricted stock units on an accelerated basis over the vesting period or requisite service period, whichever is shorter. Stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stockall equity awards and to restricted stock units includes an estimate for forfeitures. The expected forfeiture rate of all equity-based compensation is based on historical experience of pre-vesting forfeitures on awards by each homogenoushomogeneous group of shareowners. For awards granted to non-executive employees, the forfeiture rate is estimated to be 15%, 12%9% and 10%13% annually for the years ended

F- 21

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 2015,2020, respectively. There is no forfeiture rate applied to awards granted to non-employee directors or executive employees because their pre-vesting forfeitures are anticipated to be highly unlikely. As individual awards become fully vested, stock-based compensation expense is adjusted to recognize actual forfeitures.


22

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table summarizes restricted stock awards and restricted stock units granted to SeaSpine employees and non-employee directors during the year ended December 31, 2017:2021:
Restricted Stock Awards and Units
Restricted Stock Awards and Units Shares
(In thousands)
 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Shares (In thousands) Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Unvested, January 1, 201765 $9.87
Unvested, January 1, 2021Unvested, January 1, 2021797$12.71
Granted927 7.89Granted49917.32
Cancellations(14) 7.97Cancellations(66)14.96
Released/Vested(253) 8.57Released/Vested(455)12.51
Unvested, December 31, 2017725 $7.82
Unvested, December 31, 2021Unvested, December 31, 202177515.60
The weighted average grant date fair value of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units granted during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 20152020 was $7.89, $9.89$17.32 and $12.81,$12.12, respectively. The total fair value of shares subject to restricted stock awards and restricted stock units that vested in 2017, 20162021 and 20152020 was $2.2 million, $0.7$5.8 million and $1.1$6.0 million, respectively.

The Company recognized $3.8 million, $0.9$6.6 million and $0.3$5.7 million in expense related to restricted stock awards and restricted stock units for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 2015,2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2017,2021, there was approximately $2.3$4.1 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested portions of these awards.restricted stock awards and restricted stock units. This costexpense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.41.0 years.

Stock Options

Stock option grants to employees generally have a requisite service period of four to five years, and stock option grants to non-employee directors generally have a requisite service period of one year. Both are subject to graded vesting. The Company records stock-based compensation expense associated with stock options on an accelerated basis over the variousapplicable vesting periodsperiod within each grant and based on their fair value at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. The following weighted-average assumptions were used in the calculation of fair value for options grants forgranted during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:period indicated.
December 31Year Ended December 31,
2017 2016 201520212020
Expected dividend yield0% 0% 0%Expected dividend yield%%
Risk-free interest rate2.0% 1.3% 1.6%Risk-free interest rate0.6 %1.3 %
Expected volatility35.7% 38.2% 38.2%Expected volatility51.7 %46.4 %
Expected term (in years)5.1
 4.9
 5.1
Expected term (in years)4.94.9
The Company considered that it has never paid, and does not currently intend to pay, cash dividends. The risk-free interest rates are derived from the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect on the date of grant for instruments with a remaining term similar to the expected term of the options. Due to the Company’s limited historical data, theThe expected volatility is calculated based upon the historical volatility of comparable companies in the medical device industry whoseCompany's share prices are publicly available for a sufficient period of time.prices. The expected term of "plain vanilla" options is calculated using the simplified method as prescribed by accounting guidance for stock-based compensation. A "plain vanilla" option is an option with the following characteristics: (1) the option is granted at-the-money; (2) exercisability is conditional only on satisfaction of a service condition through the vesting date; (3) employees who terminate their service prior to vesting forfeit the option; (4) employees who terminate their service after vesting are granted limited time to exercise their options; and (5) the option is nontransferable and non-hedgeable. The expectedhistorical weighted average term of any other option is based on disclosures from similar companies with similar grants.the Company’s options. In addition, the Company applies an expected forfeiture rate when amortizing stock-based compensation expense. The expected forfeiture rate of options is based on historical experience of pre-vesting forfeitures on awards by each homogenoushomogeneous group of shareowners. The forfeiture rate ofFor options granted to non-executive employees, the forfeiture rate is estimated to be 15%, 12%9% and 10%13% annually for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and

2020, respectively. There is no forfeiture rate applied to options granted to non-employee directors and executive employees because their pre-vesting forfeitures are anticipated to be highly unlikely. As individual options become fully vested, stock-based compensation expense is adjusted to recognize actual forfeitures.
F- 22

23

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

2015, respectively. There is no forfeiture rate applied for non-employee directors and executive employees as their pre-vesting forfeitures are anticipated to be highly unlikely. As individual grant awards become fully vested, stock-based compensation expense is adjusted to recognize actual forfeitures.

A summary of the options granted during the year ended December 31, 20172021 and the total number of options outstanding as of that dateDecember 31, 2021 and changes since January 1, 20172021 are set forth below:
 Number of Shares Outstanding (In thousands) Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (In years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value (In thousands)
Outstanding, January 1, 20172,732
 $14.43
 6.71
 $37
Granted22
 $7.56
 
 
Exercised(5) $6.92
 
 
Forfeited(187) $12.68
 
 
Outstanding, December 31, 20172,560
 $14.51
 5.96
 $238
Vested or expected to vest, December 31, 20172,525
 $14.54
 5.96
 $217
Exercisable, December 31, 20171,744
 $14.55
 5.98
 $136

 Number of Shares Outstanding (In thousands) Weighted Average Exercise PriceWeighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (In years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value (In thousands)
Outstanding, January 1, 20213,318  $14.33  4.67 $10,667 
Granted1,137  $18.50   
Exercised(168) $12.66   
Forfeited(104) $14.98   
Outstanding, December 31, 20214,183  $15.51  4.59 $2,059 
Vested or expected to vest, December 31, 20214,072  $15.41 4.52$2,049 
Exercisable, December 31, 20212,601  $14.55  3.23 $1,521 
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 20152020 was $2.63, $3.00$8.10 and $5.57,$4.79, respectively. The total fair value of shares vested was $2.1 million in 2017, 20162021 and 2015 was $2.2$2.1 million $4.8 million, and $0.7 million, respectively.

in 2020.
The Company recognized $1.7 million, $5.0$4.2 million and $4.4$3.8 million in expense related to stock options for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021 and 2015,2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2017,2021, there was approximately $0.9$5.7 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options. This costexpense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.01.6 years.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In May 2015, the Company adopted the SeaSpine Holdings Corporation 2015 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which was amended in December 2015November 2018, as described below (as amended, the ESPP). Under the ESPP, eligible employees may purchase shares of the Company’s common stock through payroll deductions of up to 15% of eligible compensation during an offering period. Generally, each offering period will be for a period of twenty-four24 months as determined by the Company's board of directors. There are four six-month purchase periods in each offering period for contributions to be made and to be converted into shares at the end of the purchase period. In no event may an employee purchase more than 2,500 shares per purchase period based on the closing price on the first trading date of an offering period or more than $25,000 worth of stock during any calendar year. The purchase price for shares to be purchased under the ESPP is 85% of the lesser of the market price of the Company's common stock on the first trading date of an offering period or on any purchase date during an offering period (June 30 or December 31).
Subject to stockholder approval, on and effective as of November 2, 2018, the Company's board of directors approved an amendment to the ESPP pursuant to which the share reserve under the ESPP would increase from 400,000 shares to 800,000 shares. The ESPP authorizesCompany's stockholders approved that amendment in May 2019. In December 2020, the Company's board of directors approved the issuance of up to 400,000an additional 500,000 shares of common stock pursuant to purchase rights granted to employees.under the ESPP. The Company's stockholders approved that amendment in June 2021. The ESPP is intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” within the meaning of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the IRC). The first offering period under the ESPP commenced on January 1, 2016 and will end on December 31, 2017. However, the ESPP contains a restart feature, such that if the market price of the stock at the end of any six-month purchase period is lower than the market price at the original grant date of an offering period, that offering period will terminate after that purchase date, and a new two-year offering period will commence on the January 1 or July 1 immediately following the date the original offering period terminated. This restart feature was first triggered on the purchase date that occurred on June 30, 2016,2020, such that the offering period that commenced on January 1, 20162020 was terminated, and a new two-year offering period commenced on July 1, 2016. This restart feature was triggered again on the purchase date that occurred on December 31, 2016, such that the offering period that commenced on July 1, 2016 was terminated, and a new two-year offering period commenced on January 1, 20172020 and will end on December 31, 2018.June 30, 2022. The Company applied share-based payment modification accounting to the awards that were initially valued at the grant date to determine the amount of any incremental fair value associated with the modified awards. The impact to stock-based compensation expense for modifications during the year ended December 31, 2017,2021 was immaterial.


F- 23

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

During the years ended December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, there were 150,020199,843 and 89,857153,302 shares of common stock, respectively, purchased under the ESPP. The Company recognized $0.6$1.0 million and $0.5$0.9 million in expense related to the ESPP for the years ended December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, 427,317 shares were available under the ESPP for future issuance.


24

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The Company estimates the fair value of shares issued to employees under the ESPP using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. The following weighted average assumptions were used in the calculation of fair value of shares under the ESPP at the grant date for the years endedperiods indicated:
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
Expected dividend yield%%
Risk-free interest rate0.1 %0.7 %
Expected volatility40.7 %24.6 %
Expected term (in years)0.80.7

7. LEASES
The Company’s lease portfolio only includes operating leases. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively:
  December 31
  2017 2016
Expected dividend yield 0% 0%
Risk-free interest rate 1.0% 0.6%
Expected volatility 28.1% 30.5%
Expected term (in years) 1.2
 1.2

9. LEASE

The Company leases administrative, manufacturing, research, and distribution facilities and various manufacturing, office and transportation equipment through operating2021, the weighted average remaining lease agreements. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company entered into two lease agreements: one for an office located in Wayne, Pennsylvania, where the Company designs spinal implants and which facilitates the Company's interactions with customers in the Eastern United States, and another for an office located in Lyon, France, which serves as the Company's international sales and marketing office. The termsterm of these two lease agreements are through June 2022 and February 2026, respectively, and both have an average annual cost of less than $0.1 million.

Future minimum lease payments under the Company's operating leases at December 31, 2017 are as follows:
 Payments Due by Calendar Year
 (In thousands)
2018$2,083
20192,130
20202,187
20212,221
20222,242
Thereafter6,236
Total minimum lease payments$17,099
Total lease expense forwas 5.3 years and the weighted average discount rate was 6.5%. For each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021 and 20152020, lease expense, which represents expense from operating leases, was $2.2 million, $3.1$2.3 million and $2.5 million,$2.1 million.
respectively.A summary of the Company's remaining lease liabilities at December 31, 2021 are as follows:
Payments Due by Calendar Year
(In thousands)
2022$2,830 
20231,684 
20241,468 
20251,497 
20261,543 
Thereafter1,227 
Total undiscounted value of lease liabilities$10,249 
Less: present value adjustment(1,635)
Less: short-term leases not capitalized(514)
Present value of lease liabilities8,100 
Less: current portion of lease liability(2,234)
Operating lease liability, less current portion$5,866 
10.
8. INCOME TAXES

The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S., Canada, Switzerland and France. Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are calculated based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases using the enacted income tax rates expected to be in effect during the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. Significant judgment is required in determining whether a valuation allowance should be recorded against deferred tax assets. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, management considers all available evidence for each jurisdiction including past operating results, estimates of future taxable income and the feasibility of ongoing tax planning strategies. In the event that the Company changes its determination as to the amount of deferred tax assets that can be realized, the Company will adjust its valuation allowance with a corresponding impact to income tax expense in the period in which such determination is made.



25
F- 24

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

Prior to the Spin-off

Prior to the spin-off, the income tax provision in the consolidated statements of operations has been calculated using the separate return method, as if the Company filed a separate tax return and operated as a stand-alone business. Therefore, cash tax payments and items of current and deferred taxes may not be reflective of actual tax balances included in Integra’s historical consolidated income tax return.

After the Spin-off

Subsequent to the spin-off on July 1, 2015, the deferred tax balances were adjusted to reflect only those tax attributes that carryforward with the Company. The adjustment to deferred taxes was recorded through stockholders' equity. The Company also made an election to change the tax classification for its foreign entity. This election resulted in both the foreign entity and its U.S. subsidiary to be included in the consolidated federal tax group on September 1, 2015.

Income Tax Provision (Benefit)

Income (loss)Loss before income taxes consisted of the following:of:
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
(In thousands)
United States operations$(56,362)$(42,251)
Foreign operations916 (712)
$(55,446)$(42,963)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
United States operations$(34,886) $(44,072) $(51,305)
Foreign operations2,653
 308
 (1,748)
 $(32,233) $(43,764) $(53,053)

A reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory rate to the Company’s effective tax rate is as follows:
is:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2017 2016 201520212020
Federal statutory rate35.0% 35.0% 35.0%Federal statutory rate21.0%21.0%
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from: Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from:
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit4.1% 2.1% 0.1%State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit0.1%2.0%
Foreign operations(0.2)% (3.2)% (0.7)%Foreign operations1.7%(0.3)%
Changes in valuation allowances43.2% (33.1)% (16.7)%Changes in valuation allowances(23.5)%(22.3)%
Pre-Spin losses with no tax benefit—% —% (22.7)%
Uncertain tax positions0.3% 0.2% —%
Loan forgivenessLoan forgiveness2.3%—%
Research and development credit0.2% 0.2% —%Research and development credit0.3%0.6%
Return to provision—% 0.9% —%
Domestic manufacturing deduction—% —% 0.5%
Other0.8% (0.8)% (0.2)%Other0.1%(1.5)%
Change in rate resulting from the 2017 Tax Act(83.0)% —% —%
Effective tax rate0.4% 1.3% (4.7)%Effective tax rate2.0%(0.5)%

The provision/(benefit) for income taxes consisted of:
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
(In thousands)
Current:
Federal$— $— 
State110 87 
Foreign77 28 
Total current$187 $115 
Deferred:
Federal123 — 
State56 — 
Foreign(1,466)103 
Total deferred$(1,287)$103 
Provision for income taxes$(1,100)$218 

F- 25

26

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

The provision/(benefit) for income taxes consisted of the following:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Current:
 
 
Federal$(102) $(532)  $2,655
State20
 (51) 106
Foreign42
 41
 
Total current$(40) $(542) $2,761
Deferred:

 

 

Federal
 
 
State
 
 
Foreign(78) (10) (282)
Total deferred$(78) $(10) $(282)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes$(118) $(552) $2,479
The income tax effects of significant temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities, shown before jurisdictional netting, are presented below:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016
 (In thousands)
Deferred tax assets:

 

Doubtful accounts$116
 $184
Inventory related items8,976
 13,163
Tax credits158
 83
Accrued vacation348
 498
Accrued bonus815
 812
Stock compensation3,129
 3,329
Net operating loss carryforwards22,175
 19,955
Intangible and fixed assets12,054
 22,910
Other686
 923
Total deferred tax assets48,457
 61,857
Less valuation allowance(47,433) (61,118)
Deferred tax assets after valuation allowance$1,024
 $739
Deferred tax liabilities:

 

Other469
 246
Total deferred tax liabilities$469
 $246
Net deferred tax assets$555
 $493

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the 2017 Tax Act) was enacted on December 22, 2017. The 2017 Tax Act reduces the U.S federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. Accordingly, the Company has modified the value of the deferred tax assets and liabilities including the net operating loss carryover at December 31, 2017. Prior to enactment of the new tax reform, the Company had total net deferred tax assets of $74.1 million before valuation allowance at December 31, 2017. Taking the new tax reform into consideration, the Company's total net deferred tax assets were $48.0 million before valuation allowance at December 31, 2017.

The Company is not subject to the new transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings enacted by the 2017 Tax Act since the foreign operations have been included in US tax filings pursuant to an election to disregard these entities for federal income tax purposes.

F- 26

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

Year Ended December 31,
20212020
(In thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Doubtful accounts$48 $47 
Inventory related items12,453 12,317 
Tax credits1,673 563 
Compensation accruals2,000 1,479 
Lease liability1,618 2,014 
Stock compensation5,890 4,947 
Net operating loss carryforwards59,541 45,744 
Intangible and fixed assets9,035 10,740 
Other1,539 444 
Total deferred tax assets93,797 78,295 
Less valuation allowance(91,473)(75,147)
Deferred tax assets after valuation allowance$2,324 $3,148 
Deferred tax liabilities:
Intangible assets3,648 — 
Right-of-use assets1,364 1,721 
Prepaid expenses598 432 
Unrealized gains and losses983 954 
Total deferred tax liabilities$6,593 $3,107 
Net deferred tax (liabilities)/assets$(4,269)$41 
At December 31, 2017,2021, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of $88.3$237.3 million for federal and $135.0 million for state income tax purposes. The Company also had foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $2.7 million.$5.6 million for foreign income tax purposes. These tax loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2018 and 20272022 for foreign income tax purposes and in 2027 for federal and state income tax respectively,purposes, and willcontinue to expire through 2037.2042. The Company’s net operating loss carryforwards generated after 2017 for federal income tax purposes do not expire. The tax benefit recorded for net operating losses, net of valuation allowance, was less than $0.1 million which relates only to foreign net operating losses.

immaterial.
At December 31, 2016,2020, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of $51.4$187.7 million for federal and state income tax purposes. The Company also had foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $3.0 million.$0.2 million for foreign income tax purposes. These tax loss carryforwards beganbegin to expire in 2016 and 20272021 for foreign income tax purposes and in 2027 for federal and state income tax respectively,purposes, and willcontinue to expire through 2035.2039. The Company’s net operating loss carryforwards generated after 2017 for federal income tax purposes do not expire. The tax benefitexpense recorded for net operating losses, net of valuation allowance, was less than $0.1 million which relates only to foreign net operating losses.

The valuation allowance relates to deferred tax assets for certain items that will be deductible for income tax purposes under very limited circumstances and for which the Company believes it is not more likely than not that it will realize the associated tax benefit. However, in the event that the Company determines that it would be able to realize more or less than the recorded amount of net deferred tax assets, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance would be recorded in the period such a determination is made. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more-likely-than-not that some portion of all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities (including the impact of available carryback and carryforward periods), projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the levels of historical taxable income, projections of future taxable income and the reversal of deferred tax liabilities over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more-likely-than-not that the Company will realize the benefits of these deductible differences, net of the existing valuation allowance. The amount of

27

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could change in the near term if estimates which require significant judgment of future taxable income during the carryforward period are increased or decreased.

A reconciliation of the Company’s uncertain tax benefits is as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Balance, beginning of year$305
 $298
  $113
Gross increases:
 
  
Prior years’ tax positions5
 7
  90
Additions to tax positions in prior years due to spin-off
 
 185
Current year tax positions74
 107
 
Gross decreases:
 
  
Settlements
 
  
Statute of limitations lapses(107) (107)  (90)
Balance, end of year$277
 $305
 $298

Approximately $0.3 million of the balance at December 31, 2017 relates to uncertain tax positions that, if recognized, would affect the annual effective tax rate. There is $0.1 million related to tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts could be reduced during the twelve months following December 31, 2017, as a result of expiring statutes of limitations.

Year Ended December 31,
20212020
(In thousands)
Balance, beginning of year$563 $319 
Gross increases:
Prior years’ tax positions— 74 
Current year tax positions166 170 
Gross decreases:
Prior years' tax positions(14)— 
Statute of limitations lapses— — 
Balance, end of year$715 $563 
The Company recognizes interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The amounts recorded in 2017, 20162021 and 20152020 were not significant.

The Company files income tax returns as prescribed by tax laws of the jurisdictions in which it operates. In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by federal, state, local and foreign jurisdictions where applicable based on the statute of limitations that apply in each jurisdiction. The Company has no open income tax audits with any taxing authority as of December 31, 2017.2021. The Company is still subject to income tax examinations by U.S. federal and state tax authorities for the years 2016 through 2020. Open years for foreign jurisdictions are from 2015 through 2020. However, to the extent allowed by law, the tax authorities may have the right to examine prior periods where net operating losses were generated and carried forward, and make adjustments up to the amount of the net operating loss carryforward amount.

On March 27, 2020, Congress enacted the CARES Act to provide certain relief as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The CARES Act, among other things, includes provisions relating to net operating loss carryback periods, alternative minimum tax credit refunds, and modification to the net interest deduction limitations. The CARES Act did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.

F- 27

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

11.9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In consideration for certain technology, manufacturing, distribution, and selling rights and licenses granted to the Company, the Company has agreed to pay royalties on sales of certain products sold by the Company. The royalty payments thatExcept for the royalties paid to NLT, the royalties the Company made under these agreementspaid are included in the consolidated statements of operations as a component of cost of goods sold.sold in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company is subject to various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of its business with respect to its products, its current or former employees, and its commercial relationships, some of which have been settled by the Company. In the opinion of management, such proceedings are either adequately covered by insurance or otherwise indemnified, or are not expected, individually or in the aggregate, to result in a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition. However, it is possible that the Company's results of operations, financial position and cash flows in a particular period could be materially affected by these contingencies.
The Company accrues for loss contingencies when it is deemed probable that a loss has been incurred and that loss is estimable. The amounts accrued are based on the full amount of the estimated loss before considering insurance proceeds, and do not include an estimate for legal fees expected to be incurred in connection with the loss contingency. While uncertainty exists, the Company does not believe there are any pending legal proceedings that would have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations.

12.28

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
10. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

Management assessed its segment reporting based on how it internally manages and reports the results of its business to its chief operating decision maker. Management reviews financial results, manages the business and allocates resources on an aggregate basis. Therefore, financial results are reported in a single operating segment: the development, manufacture and marketing of orthobiologics, spinal implants, and of spinal implants.image guided navigation systems. The Company reports revenue in two2 product categories: orthobiologics and spinal implants.implants and enabling technologies. Orthobiologics products consist of a broad range of advanced and traditional bone graft substitutes that are designed to improve bone fusion rates following surgery. The spinal implants and enabling technologies portfolio consists of an extensive line of products for minimally invasive surgery, complex spine, deformity and degenerative procedures.
Revenue, net consisted of the following:
  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Orthobiologics $69,128
 $66,240
 $67,258
Spinal implants 62,686
 62,620
 65,920
Total Revenue, net $131,814
 $128,860
 $133,178

procedures, as well as a surgical navigation system. The Company attributes revenues to geographic areas based on the location of the customer. Total
The following table disaggregates revenue by major geographic area consistedsales channel for each of the following:periods presented (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, 2021
 United StatesInternationalTotal
 (In thousands)
Orthobiologics$83,249 $8,573 $91,822 
Spinal implants and enabling technologies$88,192 $11,437 99,629 
Total revenue, net$171,441 $20,010 $191,451 
Year Ended December 31, 2020
 United StatesInternationalTotal
 (In thousands)
Orthobiologics$71,346 $7,037 $78,383 
Spinal implants and enabling technologies$67,550 $8,412 $75,962 
Total revenue, net$138,896 $15,449 $154,345 

  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
  (In thousands)
United States $118,405
 $116,800
 $120,259
International 13,409
 12,060
 12,919
Total Revenue, net $131,814
 $128,860
 $133,178

13.11. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN

The Company has a defined contribution savings plan under section 401(k) of the IRC. The plan covers substantially all employees. The Company matches employee contributions made to the plan according to a specified formula. The Company’s matching contributions totaled approximately $0.6$1.1 million $0.6 million and $0.5 million for each of the years ended 2017, 2016December 31, 2021 and 2015, respectively.2020.




F- 28

29


SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

14. SELECTED QUARTERLY INFORMATION - UNAUDITED
 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter
 (In thousands, except per share data)
Total revenue, net:       
2017$31,894
 $34,196
 $31,742
 $33,982
201631,399
 33,201
 31,741
 32,519
Gross profit:       
2017$18,722
 $20,202
 $19,566
 $21,498
201617,116
 19,271
 17,860
 19,069
Net loss:       
2017$(9,103) $(8,043) $(7,462) $(7,507)
2016(12,007) (11,983) (9,454) (9,768)
Basic/diluted net loss per common share(1):
       
2017$(0.79) $(0.68) $(0.58) $(0.56)
2016(1.08) (1.07) (0.84) (0.87)
(1) Per common share amounts for the quarters and full years have been calculated separately. Accordingly, quarterly amounts
do not necessarily add to the annual amount because of differences in the weighted average common shares outstanding during each period principally due to the effect of the Company’s issuing or canceled shares of its common stock during the year.


F- 29

SEASPINE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

15. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

In February 2018, the Company's board of directors approved a second amendment to the 2015 Plan, pursuant to which the share reserve was increased by 350,000 shares over the current share reserve under the 2015 Plan. Such amendment is subject to the Company obtaining the requisite stockholder approval.

F- 30


SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Balance at Beginning of Period Charged to Costs and Expenses Charged to Other Accounts Additions/Deductions Balance at End of PeriodBalance at Beginning of PeriodCharged to Costs and ExpensesCharged to Other AccountsAdditions/DeductionsBalance at End of Period
DescriptionDescription
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Year ended December 31, 2017:         
Year ended December 31, 2021:Year ended December 31, 2021:
Allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns and other credits$483
 $47
 $
 $(64) $466
Allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns and other credits$192 $— $— $(118)$74 
Inventory ReservesInventory Reserves38,015 7,031 — (2,762)42,284 
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance61,118
 (13,685) 
 
 47,433
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance75,147 16,326 — — 91,473 
Year ended December 31, 2016:         
Year ended December 31, 2020:Year ended December 31, 2020:
Allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns and other credits$764
 $(207) $
 $(74) $483
Allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns and other credits$111 $— $— $81 $192 
Inventory ReservesInventory Reserves32,237 6,903 — (1,125)38,015 
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance46,638
 14,480
 
 
 61,118
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance65,576 9,571 — — 75,147 
Year ended December 31, 2015:         
Allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns and other credits$558
  $55
 $
 $151
 $764
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance83,457
  (36,819) 
 
 46,638
r
F- 31

30