UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
[ X ]  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

[X]ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192020

OR

OR
[ ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

[  ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to

_______

Commission file number: 001-34643

DROPCAR,

AYRO, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
98-0204758

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

1412 Broadway,

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

900 E. Old Settlers Boulevard, Suite 2105

New York, New York
100

Round Rock, Texas

78664
(Address of principal executive offices)
98-0204758
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
10018
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (646) 342-1595

(512) 994-4917
(Registrant’s telephone number)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Title of each class   ClassTrading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share 
  Common Stock, $0.0001 Par Value Per ShareDCARAYRO The NasdaqNASDAQ Stock Market, LLC


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [  ] No 

[X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes [  ] No 


[X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No


[  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes [X] No

[  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,”filer”, “smaller reporting company,”company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one).

:

Large accelerated filer[  ]Accelerated filer[  ]
Non-accelerated filer
[X]
Smaller reporting company[X]
 Emerging growth company[  ]

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

[  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [  ] No

[X]

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliatesnonaffiliates of the registrant (without admitting that any person whose shares are not included in such calculation is an affiliate) computed by reference to the price at which the common stock was last sold, or the average bid and asked priceas of the common stock, as ofJune 30, 2020, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $4,036,002.

$41,995,794, based on a closing price of $2.80 on June 30, 2020.

As of March 25, 2020 there were 4,551,882 30, 2021, the registrant had 35,213,048 shares of registrant’s common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain information required

Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement of AYRO, Inc., relating to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, are incorporated into Part III will be included in an amendment toof this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

10-K by reference.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  PAGE
   
Forward-Looking Statements; Risk Factor Summary
PART II.  
Item 1.135
Item 1A.1A919
Item 1B.1B2544
Item 2.22544
Item 3.326
44
Item 4.42745
   
PART II  
Item 5.52845
Item 6.62846
Item 7.72947
Item 7A.7A4066
Item 8.84066
Item 9.94166
Item 9A.9A4167
Item 9B.9B4367
   
PART III  
Item 10.104368
Item 11.114368
Item 12.124368
Item 13.134368
Item 14.144368
   
PART IV  
Item 15.154369
Item 16.164769
 
Signatures4775

NOTE ABOUT

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

STATEMENTS; RISK FACTOR SUMMARY

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. AllForward-looking statements contained in this Annual Reportmay be identified by the use of forward-looking terms such as “anticipates,” “assumes,” “believes,” “can,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “guides,” “intends,” “is confident that,” “may,” “plans,” “seeks,” “projects,” “targets,” and “would” or the negative of such terms or other variations on Form 10-Ksuch terms or comparable terminology. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, future financial and operating results, the company’s plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other than statements ofthat are not historical fact, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, our business strategy and plans, and our objectives for future operations, are forward-looking statements. The words "believe," "may," "will," "estimate," "continue," "anticipate," "intend," "expect," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.facts. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations, business strategy, short-term and long-term business operations and objectives, and financial needs.operations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties, and assumptions including those described in Part I, Item 1A, "Risk Factors" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. It is not possible for our management to predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, maythat could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements we may make. In light of these risks, uncertaintiesour historical experience and assumptions,our present expectations, or projections described under the future events and trends discussedsection in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may not occurentitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

A summary of the principal risk factors that make investing in our securities risky and might cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements is set forth below. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, cash available for distribution, ability to service our debt obligations and prospects could differbe materially and adversely affected.

we may be acquired by a third party based on pre-existing agreements;
we have a history of losses and have never been profitable, and we expect to incur additional losses in the future and may never be profitable;
the market for our products is developing and may not develop as expected;
our business is subject to general economic and market conditions, including trade wars and tariffs;
our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely impacted by public health epidemics, including the recent COVID-19 outbreak;
our limited operating history makes evaluating our business and future prospects difficult and may increase the risk of any investment in our securities;
we may experience lower-than-anticipated market acceptance of our vehicles;
developments in alternative technologies or improvements in the internal combustion engine may have a materially adverse effect on the demand for our electric vehicles;
the markets in which we operate are highly competitive, and we may not be successful in competing in these industries;
a significant portion of our revenues are derived from a single customer;
we rely on and intend to continue to rely on a single third-party supplier and manufacturer located in the People’s Republic of China for the sub-assemblies in a semi-knocked-down state for our current vehicles;
we may become subject to product liability claims, which could harm our financial condition and liquidity if we are not able to successfully defend or insure against such claims;
the range of our electric vehicles on a single charge declines over time, which may negatively influence potential customers’ decisions whether to purchase our vehicles;
increases in costs, disruption of supply or shortage of raw materials, in particular lithium-ion cells, could harm our business;
our business may be adversely affected by labor and union activities;
we may be required to raise additional capital to fund our operations, and such capital raising may be costly or difficult to obtain and could dilute our stockholders’ ownership interests, and our long-term capital requirements are subject to numerous risks;
increased safety, emissions, fuel economy, or other regulations may result in higher costs, cash expenditures, and/or sales restrictions;
we may fail to comply with environmental and safety laws and regulations;
our proprietary designs are susceptible to reverse engineering by our competitors;
if we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets or know-how, such proprietary information may be used by others to compete against us;
should we begin transacting business in other currencies, we are subject to exposure from changes in the exchange rates of local currencies; and
we are subject to governmental export and import controls that could impair our ability to compete in international market due to licensing requirements and subject us to liability if we are not in compliance with applicable laws.

For a more detailed discussion of these and other factors that may affect our business and that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those anticipatedprojected in these forward-looking statements, see the risk factors and uncertainties set forth in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any one or implied in themore of these uncertainties, risks and other influences could materially affect our results of operations and whether forward-looking statements.

statements made by us ultimately prove to be accurate. We assumeundertake no obligation to publicly update or revise or publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements, whether from new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

On May 28, 2020, pursuant to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes the accounts of DropCar, Inc. (“DropCar”) and its current and former wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries collectively referred to as “we”, “us”, “our” or the "Company". United States-based subsidiaries include or included WPCS International – Suisun City, Inc. (the “Suisun City Operations”). The Suisun City Operations has been sold and is treated as a discontinued operation.

PART 1
ITEM 1 – BUSINESS
Recent Developments
Merger and Asset Sale
On December 19, 2019, we entered into anpreviously announced Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated December 19, 2019 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and Reorganization withamong AYRO, Inc., a Delaware corporation previously known as DropCar, Inc., ABC Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of oursthe Company (“Merger Sub”), and AYRO Operating Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation previously known as AYRO, Inc. (“AYRO”AYRO Operating”), Merger Sub was merged with and into AYRO Operating, with AYRO Operating continuing after the merger as the surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”). In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless the context otherwise requires, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “our company” and “AYRO” refer to AYRO, Inc. and its subsidiaries. References to “DropCar” refer to DropCar, Inc. prior to the Merger. For more information on the merger or the sale of assets, see “Corporate History – Merger and” and “Corporate History – Closing of Asset Purchase Agreement.”

Overview

Prior to the Merger, DropCar provided consumer and enterprise solutions to urban automobile-related logistical challenges. Following the Merger, we design and manufacture compact, sustainable electric vehicles for closed campus mobility, urban and community transport, local on-demand and last mile delivery, and government use. Our four-wheeled purpose-built electric vehicles are geared toward commercial customers including universities, business and medical campuses, last mile delivery services and food service providers. We are currently designing our next generation three-wheeled vehicle to support the above-listed markets.

Products

AYRO vehicles provide the end user an environmentally friendly alternative to internal combustion engine vehicles (cars powered by gasoline or diesel oil), for light duty uses, including low-speed logistics, maintenance and cargo services, at a lower total cost.

AYRO Club Car 411

The AYRO Club Car 411 (the “AYRO Merger Agreement”411 Fleet”) is a family of electric, four-wheel compact, light-duty utility trucks sold exclusively through our contracted partner, Club Car, as part of a global multi-year sustainability solution development, sales and marketing agreement. Each of the AYRO 411 Fleet of vehicles is classified as a street legal low-speed vehicle (“LSV”), defined as a four-wheeled motor vehicle, other than an all-terrain vehicle, that is capable of reaching speeds of at least 20 miles per hour (“mph”) but not greater than 25 mph, with a gross vehicle weight rating of less than 3,000 pounds and meets the safety standards in Title 49 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, section 571.50.

The AYRO 411 Fleet has an expected range of up to 50 miles and a maximum speed range of 25 mph (or 40 kilometers per hour), in line with the United States Department of Transportation (“USDOT”) regulations for low-speed vehicles and with most state statutes, which typically limit the speed of LSVs to 25 mph on 35 mph posted roads. The current AYRO 411 Fleet includes:

the 411 Flatbed truck, which provides drivers with considerable versatility of use;
the 411 Pickup truck, which is ideal for hauling; and
the 411 Cargo Van Box, a fully enclosed cargo box.
the 411 Cargo with Powered Van Box, a fully enclosed cargo box with multiple 120V power sources separate from the drivetrain that can support cargo refrigeration and heating.

The AYRO 411 Fleet has zero gas emissions, a recharge capability of up to six to eight hours using 120V/20A outlets and a payload capacity of up to 1,100 pounds. We estimate that the AYRO 411 Fleet’s operating costs are approximately 50% lower per year compared to similarly sized gas-powered trucks/vans. Vehicles in the AYRO 411 Fleet are equipped with:

reinforced steel (coated) chassis houses the motor, controller and enclosed battery operating system;
auto-grade suspension with Transverse Leaf Spring on the front and horizontal spring with coil-over shock in the rear;
power assisted steering;
street legal if registered/licensed per standard vehicles by dealer or user;
multi-point, anchored DOT compliant safety harnesses for driver and passenger;
a standard back-up camera (appears on larger LCD display – see below);
a standard 7-inch (17.7 centimeter) LCD display;
a standard manual parking break;
four-wheel all-disk braking system and corrosion resistant body panels; and
heating and ventilation systems in the cabin of the truck.

With its low speed, zero-emissions, and cost-effectiveness, the AYRO 411 Fleet seeks to satisfy the needs of a variety of customers, including university and college campuses, retailers, airports and ports, business parks and campuses, warehouses, production facilities, resorts and theme parks, apartments and condos. We are currently working with our supply chain to add enhancements to the AYRO 411, initially designated the “AYRO 411x,” which is expected to be released in the second quarter of 2021.

Three-Wheeled Electric Vehicle Product Offerings

In addition to the AYRO 411 Fleet, we previously manufactured and sold the AYRO 311 Autocycle, a compact, three-wheeled electric vehicle (the “AYRO 311”). As the AYRO 311 was nearing end-of-life, on August 17, 2020 we sold our remaining AYRO 311 Fleet inventory to a third party for $0.12 million (the “311 Fleet Sale”). Upon such sale, we sustained a loss on disposal of $0.3 million. Subsequent to the 311 Fleet Sale, on February 12, 2021, we entered into an agreement with Arcimoto, Inc. to settle certain patent infringement claims (the “Arcimoto Settlement”), pursuant to which we agreed to cease the production, importation and sale of the AYRO 311, among other matters,things. Accordingly, we would not be contractually permitted to resume production of the AYRO 311. We are continuing the development of an all-new, three-wheeled electric vehicle, which we intend to replace the AYRO 311 as our three-wheeled electric vehicle product offering. We expect to begin manufacturing our next generation three-wheeled vehicle in the first half of 2022.

Additional Models and subjectVehicles

We continue to invest in expanding our existing all-electric vehicle technologies, integrations and vertical market solutions, in addition to growing our fleet of purpose-engineered vehicles and services.

We are currently engineering an all-electric, purpose-built e-delivery vehicle. There are a number of design elements associated with the e-vehicle, configurable/powered e-modules and range of integrated contextual data exchanges and services.

We are also currently in discussions with Club Car regarding a variety of new models and vehicles.

Manufacturing and Supply Chain

Manufacturing Agreement with Cenntro

In 2017, AYRO Operating partnered with Cenntro Automotive Group, Ltd. (“Cenntro”), which operates a large electric vehicle factory in the automotive district in Hangzhou, China, in a supply chain agreement to provide sub-assembly manufacturing services. Through the partnership, Cenntro initially acquired 19% in 2017 of AYRO Operating’s common stock. Cenntro beneficially owned approximately 4.38% of our common stock as of December 31, 2020. Cenntro owns the design of the AYRO 411 Fleet vehicles and has granted us an exclusive license to purchase the AYRO 411 Fleet vehicles for sale in North America.

Under our Manufacturing License Agreement with Cenntro (the “MLA”), in order for us to maintain our exclusive territorial rights pursuant to the satisfaction or waiverMLA, for the first three years after the effective date of March 22, 2020, we must meet the following minimum purchase requirements, which we believe we satisfied for the initial period: (i) a minimum of 300 units sold by the first anniversary of the conditions set fortheffective date of the MLA; (ii) a minimum of 800 units sold by the second anniversary of the effective date of the MLA; and (iii) a minimum of 1,300 units sold by the third anniversary of the effective date of the MLA. Cenntro will determine the minimum sale requirements for the years thereafter. Should any event of default occur, the other party may terminate the MLA by providing written notice to the defaulting party, who will have 90 days from the effective date of the notice to cure the default. Unless waived by the party providing notice, a failure to cure the default(s) within the 90-day time frame will result in the automatic termination of the MLA. Events of default under the MLA include a failure to make a required payment when due, the insolvency or bankruptcy of either party, the subjection of either party’s property to any levy, seizure, general assignment for the benefit of creditors, and a failure to make available or deliver the products in the time and manner provided for in the MLA.

Cenntro was also used to perform sub-assembly manufacturing of the AYRO 311. We import semi-knocked-down vehicle kits from Cenntro for the 411 model. We are no longer manufacturing and selling the AYRO 311 as we continue to develop our next generation three-wheeled vehicle. The vehicle kits are received through shipping containers by our assembly facility in Round Rock, Texas. The vehicles are then assembled with limited customization requirements per order. As such, the partnership with Cenntro allows us to scale manufacturing operations without significant investment in capital expenditures, and therefore bring products to market rapidly.

Final Assembly

For final assembly of the 411, we currently occupy 24,000 square feet of office and manufacturing space configured in a “U”-shaped assembly line with multiple stations per vehicle. The chart below indicates the number of vehicles and assembly time required for each. Assembly time also includes USDOT quality checks and testing as the final step of the assembly process. Additionally, the number of vehicles indicated below assumes a single shift.

VehicleAssembly
time
(Man-Hours)
Vehicle Assembly Capacity
per month
AYRO 41112400*

*This capacity would decline if we begin production of future vehicle models.

Master Procurement Agreement with Club Car

In March 2019, we entered into a five-year Master Procurement Agreement (the “MPA”) with Club Car for the sale of our four-wheeled vehicles. The MPA granted Club Car the exclusive right to sell our four-wheeled vehicles in North America, provided that Club Car orders at least 500 vehicles per year.

Although Club Car did not meet the volume threshold for 2020, we currently have no intention of selling our four-wheeled vehicles other than exclusively through Club Car. Under the terms of the MPA, we receive orders from Club Car dealers for vehicles of specific configurations, and we invoice Club Car once the vehicle has shipped. The MPA has an initial term of five (5) years commencing January 1, 2019 and may be renewed by Club Car for successive one-year periods upon 60 days’ prior written notice. Pursuant to the MPA, we granted Club Car a right of first refusal for sales of 51% or more of AYRO Operating’s assets or equity interests, which right of first refusal is exercisable for a period of 45 days following delivery of an acquisition notice to Club Car. We also agreed to collaborate with Club Car on new products similar to its four-wheeled vehicle and improvements to existing products and granted Club Car a right of first refusal to purchase similar commercial utility vehicles which AYRO Operating may develop during the term of the MPA. We are currently engaged in discussions with Club Car to develop additional products to be sold by Club Car in Europe and Asia but there can be no assurance that these discussions will be successful.

Manufacturing Services Agreement with Karma

On September 25, 2020, we entered into a Master Manufacturing Services Agreement (the “Karma Agreement”) with Karma Automotive LLC (“Karma”), pursuant to which Karma agreed to provide certain manufacturing services for the production of our vehicles. The initial statement of work provides that Karma will perform assembly of a certain quantity of the AYRO 411 vehicles and provide testing, materials management and outbound logistics services. For such services in the initial statement of work, we agreed to pay $1.2 million to Karma, of which (i) $0.52 million was paid at closing and (ii) $0.64 million is due and payable five months following the satisfaction of certain production requirements.

The Karma Agreement expires (i) 12 months from the start of volume production of the vehicles or (ii) such earlier time as the parties mutually agree in writing. In addition, Karma, in its sole discretion, may terminate the Karma Agreement at any time, without cause, upon twelve months’ prior written notice. We may terminate the Karma Agreement, without cause, upon six months’ prior written notice.

Supply Agreement with Gallery Carts

During 2020, we entered into a supply agreement with Gallery Carts, a leading provider of food and beverage kiosks, carts, and mobile storefront solutions. Joint development efforts have led to the launch of the parties’ first all-electric configurable mobile hospitality vehicle for “on-the-go” venues across the United States. This innovative solution permits food, beverage and merchandising operators to bring goods directly to consumers.

The configurable Powered Vendor Box, in the rear of the vehicle, features long-life lithium batteries that power the preconfigured hot/cold beverage and food equipment and is directly integrated with the Club Car 411. The canopy doors, as well as the full vehicle, can be customized with end-user logos and graphics to enhance the brand experience. Gallery, with 40 years of experience delivering custom food kiosk solutions, has expanded into mobile electric vehicles as customers increasingly want food, beverages and merchandise delivered to where they are gathering. For example, a recent study conducted by Technomic found that a large majority of students, 77%, desired alternative mobile and to-go food options on campus.

Gallery, a premier distributor of Club Car 411 low-speed electric vehicles manufactured by AYRO, has a diverse clientele throughout mobile food, beverage and merchandise distribution markets, for key customer applications such as university, corporate and government campuses, major league and amateur-level stadiums and arenas, resorts, airports and event centers. In addition to finding innovative and safe ways to deliver food and beverages to their patrons, reducing and ultimately eliminating their carbon footprint is a top priority for many of these customers.

Strategic Partnership with Autonomic

Additionally, we are developing a technology platform that can be deployed to any vehicle as additional value-add subscriptions offered directly to the end customer. We have partnered with Autonomic, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ford Smart Mobility LLC, to collect vehicle health, use and location information (telematics) in its transportation mobility cloud and produce purpose-built information back to us, customers and fleet operators, generating an additional revenue stream. Working together, the companies aim to develop a range of services to enable mobility applications for our line of vehicles which power everything from moving products and equipment to people and last-mile delivery services.

Business Strategy

Our goal is to continue to develop and commercialize automotive-grade, sustainable electric transportation solutions for the markets and use cases that we believe can be well served by our purpose-built, street legal and road-ready electric vehicles. Our business strategy includes the following:

Leverage the relationship with Club Car to expand our product portfolio and increase our customer base. We are working on and have plans to expand our current electric transportation solutions portfolio in collaboration with Club Car. This plan includes next generation light duty trucks and new purpose-driven electric vehicles. Additionally, we are collaborating with Club Car’s sales and marketing teams to expand adoption of our vehicles in the United States and intend to expand our geographical footprint within Club Car’s global distribution and channel network.

Scale up our operations to achieve growth. We intend to direct resources to scale up our operations, which we believe is needed to increase our revenue, including expanding and optimizing our automotive component supply chain and our flow-based assembly operations in Round Rock, Texas. Further, we plan to expand sales territories and add distribution channels, forming strategic partnerships to build-out our whole product offering and to access additional sales channels or to accelerate product adoption for particular vertical markets, building our brand, and increasing manufacturing capacity to produce higher volumes of electric vehicles.

Identify defined markets and use cases which are currently under-served but represent sizable market opportunity sub-sets of the electric vehicle market and focus development efforts on road-ready autocycles and other purpose-built electric vehicles to address such markets. We are currently developing a new series of automotive grade autocycles, engineered and optimized to meet targeted use cases such as last mile and urban delivery. We are also working on Club Car’s next generation, electric light duty trucks and developing a new purpose-built vehicle with Club Car. We intend to direct resources to advance the development of such purpose-built transportation solutions which we believe will allow us to address currently underserved, yet growing markets, that are application specific. We believe that our all-electric transportation solutions, such as our compact, lightweight and maneuverable campus and urban vehicles, can benefit targeted geographical and vertical customers by offering lower annual/lifetime total cost of ownership for zero emissions/zero carbon footprint vehicles.
Invest in research and development and qualification of sensors, cameras, software and mobility services seeking to enhance the value of using our electric vehicles and to derive incremental potential revenue streams for us and our partner ecosystem. We intend to integrate radio frequency-enabled hardware and develop data collection, communication processes and mobility services in collaboration with Autonomic. We and Autonomic plan to develop a technology platform that collects vehicle health, use and location information (telematics) into its transportation mobility cloud and produces purpose-built information back to us, customers and fleet operators, the subscription to which can be offered to the end customers which we believe will enhance the value of using our electric vehicles and provide additional revenue stream.

Trends Driving the Need for Electric Vehicles

The U.S. electric vehicle market is expected by many commentators to increase dramatically over the next decade, driven by factors such as the country’s increasingly urbanized population, the significant cost of owning and operating gas-powered vehicles, the growing global awareness of the damaging effects of pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, and rising investment in clean technology and supporting infrastructure.

A segment of the electric vehicle market, low speed electric vehicles (“LSEVs”)—which are LSVs but cannot be powered by gas or diesel fuel—are growing increasingly popular as eco-friendly options for consumers and commercial entities. LSEVs run on electric motors fueled by a variety of different batteries, such as lithium ion, molten salt, zinc-air and various nickel-based designs.

In 2017, the global LSEV market was valued at approximately $2.4 billion, according to Allied Market Research, and global sales of LSEVs have only continued to grow over the past two years, with sales expected to reach 1.5 million units in 2021. According to the Low Speed Electric Vehicles Market report conducted by Market Study Report, over the next five years, the LSEV market is expected to register a 10.8% compound annual growth rate in terms of revenue, with the global market size expected to reach $8.9 billion by 2024, up from $4.8 billion in 2019.

Trends such as increasingly stringent government regulations aimed toward reducing vehicle emissions, growing urban populations, and social pressure to adopt sustainable lifestyles all create a demand for more ecologically and economically sustainable methods of transportation. This demand continues to spur technological advancements and LSEV market growth.

Incentivizing Effect of Government Rules and Regulations. Expanding rules and regulations governing vehicle emissions have contributed to growth in the LSEV market. In particular, the U.S., Germany, France, and China have implemented stringent laws and regulations governing vehicular emissions, requiring automobile manufacturers to use advanced technologies to combat high-emission levels in vehicles. To incentivize clean-energy use, many governments are increasingly instituting substantial incentives for consumers to purchase electric vehicles, such as:

tax credits, rebates, and exemptions; reduced vehicle registration fees;
reduced utility rates; and
parking incentives.

Further, governments are establishing infrastructure benchmarks to support the growth of the electric vehicle industry.

A prime example of government involvement in developing the electric vehicle industry, a recent New Jersey bill aims to have 330,000 electric vehicles on state roads by the end of 2024 and a total of 2.0 million by 2035. To facilitate this goal, the bill calls for the state to have 400 fast-charging stations and another 1,000 slow-charging stations, both by 2025. Thirty percent of all apartment, condo and townhouse developments in New Jersey would need to have chargers by 2030, while half of all franchise hotels would need to have chargers by 2050. As the network of government rules and regulations expands, so too should investment in the research and development of LSEV technology and infrastructure.

Urbanization on the Rise. According to the U.N., in 2015, 55% of the world’s population was urban, and by 2050, it is estimated that this percentage will increase to 68%. As the world population continues to urbanize, a growing number of consumers are expected to seek alternatives, such as LSEVs, to internal combustion engine vehicles in order to save money and space in congested city streets.

Increasing Sense of Social Responsibility. In tandem with governmental efforts to curb pollution and encourage more sustainable transportation practices, consumers face increasing social pressure to adopt eco-friendly lifestyles. As this demand grows, the LSEV market should continue to develop.

Competition and Market Opportunities

The worldwide automotive market, particularly for economy and alternative fuel vehicles, is highly competitive, and we expect it will become even more so in the future. Other manufacturers have entered the three- and four-wheeled vehicle markets, and we expect additional competitors to enter this market within the next several years. As the LSEV market grows increasingly saturated, we expect to experience significant competition. The most competitive companies in the global LSEV market include HDK Electric Vehicles, Bradshaw Electric Vehicles, Textron Inc., Polaris Industries, Yamaha Motors Co. Ltd., Ingersoll Rand, Inc., Speedway Electric, AGT Electric Cars, Bintelli Electric Vehicles and Ligier Group. Our relationship with Club Car, a division of Ingersoll Rand, Inc., gives us a strong competitive advantage. Despite this fact, many of the other competitors listed above have significantly greater financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing and other resources than us and may be able to devote greater resources to the design, development, manufacturing, distribution, promotion, sale and support of their products. Many of these competitors modify an existing fossil-fuel powered golf cart to meet utility and commercial needs for an all-electric commercial utility vehicle, unlike the AYRO 411 Fleet, which was engineered, designed and produced as a portfolio of electric, light duty trucks and vans.

When compared to internal combustion engine vehicles, our vehicles are significantly more attractive based on tax, title and license fees and CO2 emissions. Compared to a standard Ford F150 (gasoline) pickup truck (2.7 liter), the AYRO 411 Fleet provides an approximate 49% reduction in operating expenses and an approximate 100% reduction in CO2 emissions (if renewed energy is used to charge the AYRO vehicles, an increasing trend for most higher education campuses and government facilities).

Our most closely-matched competitor in the LSEV industry is Polaris Gem (“Gem”), an LSEV manufacturer that manufactures products designed for applications similar to ours. Gem offers three passenger vehicle models and two utility vehicle models. Although Gem’s GEM el XD model, which is similar to vehicles in the AYRO 411 Fleet, has a lower starting MSRP than the AYRO 411 Fleet, the GEM el XD would need to be highly configured to match the standard AYRO 411 Fleet features and, with such configuration, would exceed the base MSRP of each vehicle in the AYRO 411 Fleet. The AYRO 411 Fleet has a greater pick-up bed and van box capacity that the GEM el XD, in addition to 13% more horsepower and a 48% better turning radius, allowing drivers of the AYRO 411 Fleet to execute maneuvers in tighter spaces than they would using the GEM el XD.

We expect competition in our industry to intensify in the future in light of increased demand for alternative fuel vehicles, continuing globalization and consolidation in the worldwide automotive industry. Factors affecting competition include product quality and features, innovation and development time, pricing, reliability, safety, customer service and financing terms. Increased competition may lead to lower vehicle unit sales and increased inventory, which may result in downward price pressure and may adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects. Our ability to successfully compete in our industry will be fundamental to our future success in existing and new markets and our market share. There can be no assurances that we will be able to compete successfully in our markets. If our competitors introduce new cars or services that compete with or surpass the quality, price or performance of our vehicles or services, we may be unable to satisfy existing customers or attract new customers at the prices and levels that would allow us to generate attractive rates of return on our investment. Increased competition could result in price reductions and revenue shortfalls, loss of customers and loss of market share, which could harm our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

Target Markets

The multipurpose applications and clean energy use of LSEVs make them popular across a wide array of industries and customers, including college and university campuses, resorts and hotels, corporate parks, hospitals, warehouses, individual consumers, last mile delivery service providers, municipalities, and the food service industry. A number of these market segments, and our competitive position within them, are discussed in greater detail below.

Universities. LSEVs are growing increasingly common on university and college campuses due to a number of factors. LSEVs fulfil the versatile needs of campuses better than golf carts or standard combustion vehicles because, not only does LSEVs’ low speed threshold promote safer driving among pedestrians, the vehicles are also street legal with on-road safety features, enabling drivers to drive on roads and free up pedestrian space along sidewalks and smaller pathways. Additionally, the significantly reduced carbon imprint of LSEVs compared to internal combustion engine vehicles appeal to environmentally aware students and professors looking to promote environmental sustainability on campus. By transitioning from internal combustion engine vehicles to LSEVs, campuses should be able to reduce significantly the costs spent on fuel, oil, parts, and maintenance. Our AYRO 411 Fleet provides all of these benefits to university and college campuses. We estimate that in the U.S., there are over 1,800 higher education campuses with over 10,000 students each with over 400 on-campus vehicles that are ideal targets for the AYRO 411 Fleet as campuses transition from fossil-fueled campus fleet vehicles to EVs.

Food Delivery Services. As the millennial generation assumes a more substantial portion of the consumer population, customers increasingly favor convenience and timeliness, spurring dramatic growth in online ordering and delivery services across a wide swath of industries, including food delivery and restaurant ordering services. Food delivery sales are anticipated to increase over 20% per year, culminating in an expected $365 billion worldwide by 2030, according to Upserve. Upserve further estimates that approximately 60% of U.S. consumers report that they order delivery or takeout at least once a week. Within the next decade, potentially over 40% of restaurant sales will be attributable to delivery services, according to Morgan Stanley. In our market research, we have determined that delivery services, including restaurants using the next generation three-wheeled vehicle as a delivery vehicle rather than outsourcing delivery to third party services, would reduce their delivery costs by up to 50%. Delivery service companies using our next generation three-wheeled vehicle as an in-house delivery vehicle rather than outsourcing delivery would also be better equipped to manage the customer experience and maintain customer relationships and data.

Last Mile Delivery Service. Retail focus on last mile delivery—the movement of goods from a transportation hub to the final delivery destination—has grown exponentially over the past few years due to the rise in online ordering and e-commerce. Consumers’ ability to pick and choose products based on delivery speed and availability makes last mile delivery a key differentiator among retailers. Last mile delivery provides retailers timelier and more convenient delivery options not offered by the main three shipping services in the U.S. (the U.S. Postal Service, FedEx, and UPS). Additionally, given the increasing designation of low emission zones in urban centers, retailers will need to continue to deploy eco-friendly vehicles. Retailers will likely expand the use of LSEV fleets to make deliveries in low emission zones due to their zero gas emissions and lower price than competing electric vehicles. We expect that the AYRO 411 Fleet, with its variety of cargo bed options ideal for hauling and delivery and its low price point, should stand out among the competition.

Municipalities. As more city governments adopt regulations geared toward reducing pollution from vehicles, cities are increasingly looking to replace their municipal vehicles with zero-emission fleets. Such fleet overhauls, however, can be costly. LSEVs are a cheaper and more practical option for cities daunted by the cost of standard electronic vehicles. Our LSEVs have both on and off-road capabilities, making them particularly versatile for municipalities.

On-Road and Personal Transportation. LSEVs offer a feasible and practical method of transportation, especially in urban centers. Because our LSEVs are street legal, they offer city dwellers a more sustainable, cost-efficient, easily maneuverable, compact and light weight option compared to internal combustion engine vehicles. Our LSEVs also offer a variety of specifications and equipment, meaning that consumers do not have to sacrifice comfort or convenience.

We primarily focus on the LSEV North American market, which is highly competitive and constitutes 28% of the global LSEV market according to Wise Guy Reports. We have examined various considerations with regard to our market impact, including cost comparisons to existing vehicles in the market, market validation and target commercial markets.

Business Developments

On September 25, 2020, we entered into the Karma Agreement with Karma. The term of the contract is for 12 months. Pursuant to the agreement Karma will provide certain manufacturing services, starting in 2021, under an attached statement of work including final assembly, raw material storage and logistical support of AYRO’s vehicles in return for compensation of $1.2 million. We paid Karma an amount of $0.52 million which was recorded as prepaid expense as of December 31, 2020. Additionally, we made a cash payment of $0.08 million and issued warrants to an advisor to the transaction at signing of the contract with a fair value of $0.07 million.

Resources

We source our semi-knocked-down kits for the AYRO 411 from Cenntro. While many of their components are commercial off-the-shelf (“COTS”) parts, many are specific to the 411 product and are subject to raw material limitations. However, in designing our next generation three-wheeled vehicle, we are endeavoring to reduce supply risk by designing the vehicle to use as many COTS components as possible. Additionally, we are designing the platform for our next generation three-wheeled vehicle to fit replacement parts from multiple suppliers, which helps us reduce our resource supply risk.

Intellectual Property

As we expand our vehicle & service roadmaps, and integrated technologies, our focus on identifying specific market and customer needs continues to drive purpose-built engineering efforts.

Leveraging the all-electric AYRO 411 Fleet LSV and Non- LSV Vehicles, we develop applications or use case solutions optimized for the storage, delivery and logistics for delivering food, beverages, merchandise, equipment, tools and related goods. This is accomplished by integrating application-specific appliances, storage facilities, vehicle wraps and brands and related items. We leverage either integrated traction or a separate battery power system to provide AC power to the various appliances and solution elements. We are filing and have filed a number of provisional utility and/or design patents associated with the aforementioned verticalization development, and we have filed for both in the United States and internationally trademarks to cover the company name, company logo, and certain other key product and service marks. We continue to focus on innovative and applicable electric vehicle optimization designs that serve an expanding customer and application use base.

Patents

We currently have United States registrations for two design patents. Both were issued on February 11, 2020 and will expire on February 11, 2035. In addition to these issued patents, we have numerous non-public patent applications on file with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”).

We have filed United States registrations for three provisional patents in February 2021. Unless the patents are perfected within a twelve-month period from their filing date, they will expire.

Trademarks

We have numerous granted and pending trademark applications in the United States and abroad. We registered the word “AYRO” as United States Registration No. 88431321 on June 23, 2020. This registration was also filed in Canada, Mexico, and the European Union under the Madrid Protocol as Registration No. 1507096. Our company logo was registered as United States Registration No. 88859276 on October 13, 2020. This logo was also registered in Canada, Mexico, and the European Union under the Madrid Protocol as Registration No. 1554092. Our application for the color version of our company logo was filed in the United States on October 9, 2020 as Serial No. 90245135 and is currently in prosecution with the USPTO. We have also filed an application on March 9, 2021 for the mark “Driven to Deliver” in the United States as Serial No. 90567849.

Government Regulations

Many governmental standards and regulations relating to safety, fuel economy, emissions control, noise control, vehicle recycling, substances of concern, vehicle damage, and theft prevention are applicable to new motor vehicles, engines, and equipment manufactured for sale in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere. In addition, manufacturing and other automotive assembly facilities in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere are subject to stringent standards regulating air emissions, water discharges, and the handling and disposal of hazardous substances. The most significant of the standards and regulations affecting AYRO are discussed below.

14

Mobile Source Emissions Control

The federal Clean Air Act imposes stringent limits on the amount of regulated pollutants that lawfully may be emitted by new vehicles and engines produced for sale in the United States. The current (“Tier 2”) emissions regulations promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency, or the EPA, set standards for motorcycles. Tier 2 emissions standards also establish durability requirements for emissions components to 5 years or 30,000 kilometers.

California has received a waiver from the EPA to establish its own unique emissions control standards for certain regulated pollutants. New vehicles and engines sold in California must be certified by the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”). CARB’s emissions standards for motorcycles are in line with those of the EPA. We currently expect that our vehicles will meet and exceed both the EPA’s and CARB’s standards.

Motor Vehicle Safety

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”) defines a motorcycle as “a motor vehicle with motive power having a seat or saddle for the use of the rider and designed to travel on not more than three wheels in contact with the ground.” In order for a manufacturer to sell motorcycles in the U.S., the manufacturer has to self-certify to meet a certain set of regulatory requirements promulgated by the NHTSA in its Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (“FMVSS”).

AYRO’s FMVSS strategy is designed to meet both federal motorcycle and state-specific autocycle requirements, as applicable, and conform as much as possible to automotive FMVSS requirements while not violating the motorcycle requirements that AYRO must meet.

The National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, or “Safety Act,” regulates vehicles and vehicle equipment in two primary ways. First, the Safety Act prohibits the sale in the United States of any new vehicle or equipment that does not conform to applicable vehicle safety standards established by NHTSA. Meeting or exceeding many safety standards is costly, in part because the standards tend to conflict with the need to reduce vehicle weight in order to meet emissions and fuel economy standards. Second, the Safety Act requires that defects related to motor vehicle safety be remedied through safety recall campaigns. A manufacturer is obligated to recall vehicles if it determines the vehicles do not comply with a safety standard If we or NHTSA determine that either a safety defect or noncompliance exists with respect to any of our vehicles, the cost of such recall campaigns could be substantial.

Operator’s License and Helmet Requirements

State regulations regarding operator licensing and occupant helmet requirements are currently a nationwide patchwork with regard to certain three-wheeled vehicles that may be classified as autocycles. While the strong majority of states have some form of exemption from helmet and motorcycle license requirements for three-wheeled vehicles qualifying as autocycles, the specific wording of each state’s statute may or may not include our three-wheeled vehicles. For example, in a selection of our larger market potential states of California, Texas and Florida, three-wheeled vehicles that are “fully enclosed” or “enclosed cab” are exempt from helmet and motorcycle endorsement requirements. In addition, for states that have passed specific autocycle requirements, many require that the vehicle have standard operating controls (accelerator and brakes) and a standard steering wheel, plus additional requirements. Our three-wheeled vehicles will offer standard controls to meet requirements aligned with these elements.

Our advocacy strategy involves creating a plan to work with state legislatures to advocate the normalization of these rules to reduce consumer confusion in the marketplace that comes from conflicting state-by-state regulations. Additionally, new products brought to market are designed in accordance with the most-restrictive state autocycle and vehicle laws so as to comply with all state laws and regulations.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) Certification

Our product programs are built on plug-in electric, zero emissions platforms. We report federal and state emissions data consistent with 10 CFR 474 and CARB requirements for Zero-Emission Vehicle certification.

Electromagnetic Compatibility

The Federal Communications Commission is the federal agency responsible for implementing and enforcing the communications law and regulations, including title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, specifically Part 15, which regulates unlicensed radio-frequency transmissions, both intentional and unintentional. With very few exceptions, all electronics devices must be reviewed to comply with Part 15 before they can be advertised or sold in the U.S. market.

Motor Vehicle Manufacturer and Dealer Regulation

As with helmet laws and driver license requirements, state laws that regulate the manufacture, distribution, and sale of motor vehicles are a patchwork, nationwide. Our agreement with Club Car aims to provide U.S. and targeted countries channel and dealer coverage. For our electric vehicles, outside of our collaboration with Club Car or another third-party sales/distribution white label partner, we plan on a multi-faceted approach to sales, including exploring the following: (i) developing an expanded network of channel partners; (ii) entering into direct sales via a national leasing company that will in turn consummate sales with end users in a variety of states; and/or (iii) opening facilities in high growth states and delivering the vehicle to the end user via a common carrier.

We are registered as a manufacturer in Texas, California, Colorado, Louisiana, Florida and Arizona.

Pollution Control Costs

We are required to comply with stationary source air pollution, water pollution, and hazardous waste control standards that are now in effect or are scheduled to come into effect with respect to our manufacturing operations.

Research and Development

Our product development and engineering efforts align with the Society of Automotive Engineering (“SAE”) J2258_201611 standards for Light Utility Vehicles. The J2258 standard provides key compliance criteria for Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (“GVWR”), occupant protection and safety restraint systems, lateral and longitudinal stability, center of gravity and operating controls, among others. Our test validation and inspection standards follow FMVSS 49 CFR 571.500 for LSVs with the additions of SAE J585 and FMVSS 111 for rear visibility, lighting, signaling, reflectors, changes in direction of movement, back-up camera response timing and field of view.

Our development standards and test compliance validation processes are supported by a variety of test documentation including supplier self-reporting, third party laboratory test reports and regional compliance validation with CARB for speed, range and environmental performance.

Our production system follows a lean, cell-based manufacturing model. The process involves the following five sequential cells: (1) cab preparation, (2) chassis preparation, (3) system integration and testing, (4) final assembly and integration test, and (5) QA & FMVSS Compliance. Assembly quality and shift efficiency metrics are measured daily by our production staff at end of every shift.

We maintain a certification and compliance check list for each vehicle. Our three and four-wheeled vehicles use an automotive style steering wheel, turn signal stalk, headlight, running light and reverse light controls, a multi-speed windshield wiper and washer and an accelerator and brake pedal consistent with controls employed in standard passenger cars. As the AYRO 411 Fleet vehicles are direct drive vehicles, there is no stick shift, clutch, paddle shift, or belt driven CSV (continuously variable) transmission needed to operate the vehicles within the intended torque band and speed range. Accordingly, our vehicles are homologated under existing U.S., state and local LSV requirements and the corresponding motorcycle and autocycle requirements under 49 CFR 571.3.

Segment Information

We operate as one reportable segment, which is the design, development, manufacturing and sales of electric vehicles.

Employees

As of December 31, 2020, we had 26 full-time employees. None of our employees are represented by a labor union, and we maintain good relations with our employees. We have not furloughed employees due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In an effort to attract and retain quality employees, we offer industry-standard compensation and benefits packages to our employees and prospective employees.

Geographic Areas

We operate in the United States and all our revenue was generated in the United States during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. All of our assets are held in United States.

Corporate History

Merger

On May 28, 2020, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, by and among the Company, Merger Sub, will mergeand AYRO Operating, Merger Sub was merged with and into AYRO Operating, with AYRO Operating continuing after the merger as ourthe surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. At the effective time of the Merger, without any action on the part of any stockholder, each issued and outstanding share of AYRO Operating’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “AYRO Operating Common Stock”), including shares underlying AYRO Operating’s outstanding equity awards and warrants, was converted into the right to receive 1.3634 shares (the “Exchange Ratio”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Company Common Stock”). Immediately following the effective time of the Merger, the Company effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of the issued and outstanding Company Common Stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”), and immediately following the Reverse Stock Split, the Company issued a stock dividend of one share of Company Common Stock for each outstanding share of AYRO Operating Common Stock to all holders of record immediately following the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split (the “Stock Dividend”). The net result of the Reverse Stock Split and the surviving corporationStock Dividend was a 1-for-5 reverse stock split. Upon completion of the merger (the “AYRO Merger”).  We will issueMerger and the transactions contemplated in the Merger Agreement and assuming the exercise in full of all pre-funded warrants issued pursuant thereto, (i) the former AYRO Operating equity holders (including the investors in a bridge financing and in private placements that closed prior to closing of the Merger) owned approximately 79% of the outstanding equity of the Company; (ii) former DropCar stockholders owned approximately 18% of the outstanding equity of the Company; and (iii) a financial advisor to DropCar and AYRO owned approximately 3% of the outstanding equity of the Company.

The Merger was treated as a reverse recapitalization effected by a share exchange for financial accounting and reporting purposes because substantially all of DropCar, Inc.’s operations were disposed of as part of the consummation of the Merger and therefore no goodwill or other intangible assets were recorded by the Company as a result of the Merger. AYRO Operating was treated as the accounting acquirer, as its stockholders controlled the Company after the Merger, even though DropCar, Inc. was the legal acquirer. As a result, the assets and liabilities and the historical operations that are reflected in our consolidated financial statements are those of AYRO Operating as if AYRO Operating had always been the reporting company. All references to AYRO Operating, Inc. shares of our common stock, to the AYRO equity holders in connection with the AYRO Merger as merger consideration.

Alsowarrants and options have been presented on a post-merger, post-reverse split basis.

Closing of Asset Purchase Agreement

On December 19, 2019, weDropCar entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among us, DropCar Operating Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of DropCar (“DropCar Operating”),with DC Partners Acquisition, LLC (“DC Partners”), Spencer Richardson and David Newman, pursuant to which DropCar Operating agreed to sell substantially all of the assets associated with its business of providing vehicle support, fleet logistics and concierge services for both consumers and the automotive industry to an entity controlled by Messrs. Richardson and Newman, our currentthe Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Business Development Officer respectively (the “Asset Sale Transaction”).at the time, respectively. The aggregate purchase price for the purchased assets consistsconsisted of the cancellation of certain liabilities pursuant to those certain employment agreements by and between DropCar Operating and each of Messrs. Richardson and Newman, plus the assumption of certain liabilities relating to, or arising out of, workers’ compensation claims that occurred prior to the closing date of the Asset Purchase Agreement.

Following On May 28, 2020, the AYRO Merger andparties to the Asset Sale Transaction, it is anticipated thatPurchase Agreement entered into Amendment No. 1 to the combined company will focus its resources on executing AYRO’s current business plan.
Nasdaq Hearing
On September 6, 2019, we received notification from The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement Amendment”) stating that we did not comply, which Asset Purchase Agreement Amendment (i) provides for the inclusion of up to $0.03 million in refunds associated with certain insurance premiums as assets being purchased by DC Partners, (ii) amends the covenant associated with the minimum $1.00 bid price requirementfunding of the DropCar business, such that DropCar provided the DropCar business with additional funding of approximately $0.18 million at the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement and (iii) provides for continued listing set forth in Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (the “Listing Rule”). In accordance with Nasdaq listing rules, we were afforded 180 calendar days (until March 4, 2020)a current employee of the Company being transferred to regain compliance with the Listing Rule. On March 5, 2020, we received notification from the Listing Qualification Department of Nasdaq that we had not regained compliance with the Listing Rule. The notification indicated that our common stock would be delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market unless we request an appeal of this determination. On March 12, 2020, we requested a hearingDC Partners to appeal the determination with the Nasdaq Hearings Panel (the “Panel”), which will stay the delisting of our securities pending the Panel’s decision. The hearing is scheduled for April 16, 2020. Our appealprovide transition services to the Panel includedCompany for a planperiod of three months after the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement. The Asset Purchase Agreement closed on May 28, 2020, immediately following the consummation of the Merger.

Corporate Information

Our corporate headquarter is located at 900 E. Old Settlers Blvd, Round Rock, Texas 78664. Our phone number is 512-994-4917. Our website address is www.ayro.com. The information on, or that sets forthcan be accessed through, our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report. We currently lease approximately 23,927 square feet of office and warehouse space under a commitmentlease that expires on March 31, 2027.

Available Information

We make available, free of charge, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to consider all available options to regain compliance with the Listing Rule, including the option to effectuate a reverse stock split upon receipt of stockholder approval, which we intend to seek in connection with the joint proxy statementthese reports on our website at www.ayro.com as soon as reasonably practicable after those reports and consent solicitation statement/prospectusother information is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2020 in connection with the AYRO Merger, in order to bring our stock price over the $1.00 bid price requirement and to meet the $4.00 bid price initial listing requirement. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in regaining compliance with the Listing Rule.


Exchange Agreements
On February 5, 2020, we entered into separate exchange agreements (the “Exchange Agreements”) with the holders of existing Series H-5 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series H-5 Shares”), par value $0.0001 per share, to exchange an equivalent number of shares of our Series H-6 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series H-6 Shares”), par value $0.0001 per share (the “Exchange”(“SEC”). The Exchange closed on February 5, 2020. The purpose of the exchange was to grant voting rights to the holders of the Series H-6 Shares.
On February 5, 2020, we filed the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series H-6 Shares (the “Series H-6 Certificate of Designation”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, establishing and designating the rights, powers and preferences of the Series H-6 Shares. We designated up to 50,000 shares of Series H-6 Shares and each share has a stated value of $72.00 (the “H-6 Stated Value”). Each Series H-6 Share is convertible at any time at the option of the holder thereof, into a number of shares of our common stock determined by dividing the H-6 Stated Value by the initial conversion price of $0.72 per share, subject to a 9.99% blocker provision. The Series H-6 Shares have the same dividend rights as the common stock, except as provided for in the Series H-6 Certificate of Designation or as otherwise required by law. The Series H-6 Shares also have the same voting rights as the common stock, except that in no event shall a holder of Series H-6 Shares be permitted to exercise a greater number of votes than such holder would have been entitled to cast if the Series H-6 Shares had immediately been converted into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to $0.78 (subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations, reorganizations, reclassifications, combinations, reverse stock splits or other similar events). In addition, a holder (together with its affiliates) may not be permitted to vote Series H-6 Shares held by such holder to the extent that such holder would beneficially own more than 9.99% of our common stock. In the event of any liquidation or dissolution, the Series H-6 Shares rank senior to the common stock in the distribution of assets, to the extent legally available for distribution.
Business
Overview
We are a provider of automotive vehicle support, fleet logistics and concierge services for both consumers and the automotive industry. In 2015, we launched our cloud-based Enterprise Vehicle Assistance and Logistics (“VAL”) platform and mobile application (“App”) to assist consumers and automotive-related companies to reduce the costs, hassles and inefficiencies of owning a car, or fleet of cars, in urban centers. Our VAL platform is a web-based interface to our core service that coordinates the movements and schedules of trained valets who pickup and drop off cars at dealerships and customer locations. The App tracks progress and provides email and text notifications on status to both dealers and customers, increasing the quality of communication and subsequent satisfaction with the service. To date, we operate primarily in the New York metropolitan area.
Despite expanding city populations and the growing dependence on cars for urban mobility, the shrinking supply of vehicle services (i.e., garages, service centers, etc.) is bottlenecking the next wave of transportation innovation. To solve for this systemic urban problem, our technology captures and analyzes real time data to dynamically optimize a rapidly growing network of professional valets across a suite of vehicle transport and high-touch support services.
We believe that consumers love the freedom and comfort of having a personal vehicle but are held hostage by their dependence on the physical location of garages and service centers for parking and maintenance. The continued population shift into cities and resulting increase in real estate prices are only compounding this burden. We seek to solve this problem by freeing clients from the reliance on the physical location of garages and service centers.
We achieve this balance of increased consumer flexibility and lower consumer cost by aggregating demand for parking and other automotive services and redistributing their fulfillment to partners in the city and on city outskirt areas that have not traditionally had access to lucrative city business. Beyond the immediate unit economic benefits of securing bulk discounts from vendor partners, we believe there is significant opportunity to further vertically integrate such businesses along the supply chain into our platform.
On the enterprise side, original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), dealers, and other service providers in the automotive space are increasingly being challenged with consumers who have limited time to bring in their vehicles for maintenance and service, making it difficult to retain valuable post-sale service contracts or scheduled consumer maintenance and service appointments. Additionally, many of the vehicle support centers for automotive providers (i.e., dealerships, including body work and diagnostic shops) have moved out of urban areas thus making it more challenging for OEMs and dealers in urban areas to provide convenient and efficient service for their consumer and business clientele. Similarly, shared mobility providers and other fleet managers, such as rental car companies, face a similar urban mobility challenge: getting cars to and from service bays, rebalancing vehicle availability to meet demand and getting vehicles from dealer lots to fleet locations.

In response to this growing urban mobility challenge, we work directly with enterprises in the automotive space providing them with the ability to have our valets transport vehicles to and from customers, while also driving new revenue from new and existing customers and their vehicles from within our consumer subscription base.
We are able to offer our enterprise services at a fraction of the cost of alternatives, including other third parties or expensive in-house resources, given our pricing model that reduces and/or eliminates any downtime expense while also giving clients access to a network of trained valets on demand that can be scaled up or down based on the real time needs of the enterprise client. We support this model by maximizing the utilization of our employee-valet workforce across a curated pipeline for both the consumer and business network.
How DropCar Works
Business-to-Consumer (“B2C”)
Our customers use DropCar to reduce the cost and hassles of owning a car through the following service:
● 
Self-Park Storage — When a B2C customer living within Manhattan or Brooklyn needs to find a monthly parking spot near their residence or other desired location, the B2C customer uses the DropCar App to locate a nearby garage with available space and can sign up for garage access on a monthly basis. This monthly self-park storage subscription ranges in price from $249 to $600 per month based on garage location, a discount to what we believe to be the typical cost of garage parking in New York City.
Business-to-Business (“B2B”)
Our B2B customers rely on us to facilitate selling, leasing, renting and sharing their vehicles at scale in urban centers. While the types of businesses we work with are continuing to expand, our current primary B2B customers include:
● 
OEMs, Dealers, and Leasing Agents — Using our technology platform and large network of readily available valets, we enable branded automobile dealerships, leasing companies, peer to peer platforms and OEMs to offer a unique level of convenience for their service center operations and customers by providing efficient pick-up and drop-off service. We also enable automotive-related companies to track and digitize the lifecycle of their vehicle movements; many of these companies have never had the technology or resources to track such data prior to our engagement. The combination of easy to access high-touch service fulfillment plus data maturation allows our B2B customers the ability to more quickly launch new service offerings without the need to incur the heavy up-front investments or long-term commitments historically associated with building and managing a dedicated in-house workforce. Dealers, peer to peer market places and manufacturers can leverage our fully hosted middleware and mobile App or can integrate our service into their own consumer mobile apps (or directly into the vehicle’s native software (e.g., OnStar®)) for seamless scheduling, maintenance and delivery services. In addition, our B2B customers can integrate our cost saving and convenient consumer support services and subscriptions (i.e., parking, fueling and washing, etc.) directly into their showroom sales and leasing offerings to increase the likelihood of a sale.
● 
Fleets and Car Sharing — Strong growth in “e-hailing” and shared mobility/car sharing services, along with the burgeoning response from the traditional rental car industry, has increased consumer expectations for more flexibility and reliability from their automotive and transportation service providers. At the same time, consumers continue to increase their sensitivity to price. As a result, businesses in these industries are moving quickly to identify opportunities to protect their operating margin while building competitive differentiation through the integration of services attractive to consumer needs.
This trend has created highly fertile ground for us to establish ourselves as a backbone partner with companies and platforms seeking to compete in this highly competitive sector by providing the same set of logistical support services and consumer facing add-on services that our service provides to OEMs, peer to peer platforms, dealers and leasing agents. In 2018, we entered into several service agreements to provide transport, prep, vehicle registration, cleaning and maintenance services for a customer’s fleet of vehicles in a metropolitan area to support its on-demand car sharing service. These services will be provided and coordinated through access to our VAL platform, which enables the fleet managers to schedule and track movements and services via a dedicated, secure portal.

● 
Real Estate — We understand that parking spots in on-site garages often decrease the overall value of property. Developers are often able to add value by using the space that would otherwise be used for parking spots for other alternatively valuable purposes. At the same time, certain cities across the United States are placing caps on the total number of parking spaces per unit for new developments. While this may benefit developers, it may be negative for prospective tenants who own cars.
We believe that our vehicle storage and delivery service position us well within the new ecosystem — where our “virtual garage” provides consumers greater flexibility with transportation related solutions while helping reduce stress and costs associated with existing garages and crowded street parking.
DropCar Informatics
We also enable automotive-related businesses to capture, analyze and catalog critical data that is compiled into searchable databases about their customers and operations, including real time vehicle tracking, vehicle photos, vehicle inspection summaries, as well as consumer profiles and preferences.
We are actively integrating new tools into our platform to help businesses launch new products and services to deepen their customer relationships beyond the point of sale, including consumer-facing scheduling websites and tools for marketing into their own consumer subscriber base.
Vertical Integration and Future of Automotive Space
● 
Vertical Integration — Today, we leverage our ability to aggregate demand around our core services alongside our logistics and fulfillment infrastructure to form margin attributive relationships with third-party vendors looking to grow their businesses. However, as our databases expand and we increase the predictability of our clients’ needs across these respective services, we may seek to acquire assets and service businesses to further try and increase margins and synergies while generating incremental investment returns derived from these assets.
● 
Future of Automotive Industry — Many automotive companies, rental car companies and car sharing programs are developing subscription models, peer to peer models and service portfolios to cater to increasingly personalized customer preferences. These trends are symptomatic of the broader market shift towards a car share and subscription-based economy to accommodate the greater value consumers are placing on the flexibility and option of paying for products and services on demand as opposed to traditional automobile ownership. We continue to offer our “micro logistics support services” for the vehicle lifecycle which may eventually go beyond our current mobile App, and into vehicles directly.
Sales and Marketing

We currently use select digital marketing efforts to drive awareness of our B2C and B2B businesses. B2C business development has been driven by these marketing efforts and word-of-mouth referrals. The B2B business development has been achieved through the traditional direct sales efforts by our executives to companies in the automotive supply chain, rental car, fleet, shared and peer to peer mobility industries.

Employees
As of March 25, 2020, we had 5 full time employees and 1 part time employee. We believe that our relations with our employees are good.
Properties
For our self-park business, we have month to month agreements with a number of garage companies strategically located throughout Manhattan and Brooklyn which, among other items, permit our customers parking access. Through our large inventory of monthly subscriptions, we are able to favorably negotiate underutilized parking spaces throughout our coverage areas and cost effectively store vehicles for our B2C customers. We also have certain arrangements from time to time with garage facilities for specific event days and other parking needs where an event is seeking our valet services.

Intellectual Property
Our primary source of revenue is generated by our service offerings through our proprietary mobile App, available for download on the Apple iTunes App Store and the Google Play Store. We developed our App using a dedicated third-party code development team. We own the software code associated with our mobile App. The App centralizes and automates the management of our reservations, vehicle locations, customer service and payment to optimize customer experience, minimize costs and leverage efficiencies.
Our reservation system is built on a mix of open source web applications and in-house technology developed by our technology team to enable existing users to reserve our services using mobile applications on the iPhone or Android platforms. Through our reservation system, customers have around-the-clock access to the complete, real-time availability of our services and can manage all necessary transactions electronically.
We use third-party software for our credit card payment processing which has been integrated directly into our application platform. This third-party payment processing software allows us to provide for accurate billing and timely payment and gives us the flexibility to scale the business.
We designed and built our technology with the goal of providing the most convenient, efficient and reliable service possible. Our iPhone and Android applications are examples of how we continue to seek ways to improve and simplify the customer experience. We continue to invest in improving our technology platform to meet the needs of our growing business.
In addition, the DropCar name and design mark are federally registered U.S. trademarks, with registrations effective until November 30, 2022 and May 1, 2023, respectively, subject to renewal.
Competition
With respect to our B2C services, our competitors include traditional parking garages and service centers, emerging maintenance and repair mobile application providers and alternatives to traditional car ownership and leasing for personal mobility (i.e., e-hailing, car sharing, renting, etc.).
While these alternatives to traditional car ownership and leasing are competitors to our B2C business, they are target clients for our B2B business services and as such are not seen as true competitors. There are, however, separate B2B focused automotive logistics and support platforms that compete with our B2B business.
● 
Traditional Parking Garages and Service Centers — Our B2C offering competes directly with on-site parking garages. Our service offering presumes that parking a car in an urban setting remains challenging and expensive. We compete with traditional valet parking facilities as well as on-site parking garages which may offer more convenient options to consumers than our services. The same competitive risks exist for local repair shops and service centers.
We believe, however, that consumers and businesses alike are increasingly looking for vehicle support services to help clients avoid sacrificing valuable time and convenience.
Historically, companies such as Luxe, which closed operations in July 2017 and subsequently sold their technology to Volvo in September 2017, and Valet Anywhere, which closed operations in July 2016, have unsuccessfully tried to build similar on-demand service models. We believe these companies failed due to multiple factors, including the use of expensive in-city garages, a parking-only focus and low valet utilization rates directed only to servicing consumers (B2C). Unlike these historical competitors, we attempt to solve for these issues by offering a self-service option priced at a positive gross margin and billed in advance of the month’s usage, and by seeking to more effectively optimize valet utilization across both B2C and B2B clients. We believe that this diversification of services and revenue streams is critical for building a more compelling and scalable vehicle support platform that is positioned to benefit from larger urban mobility trends.


● 
Emerging Maintenance and Repair Mobile Apps — Our B2C offering competes directly with new mobile applications that seek to connect local repair shops and mechanics with customers for on-site car service fulfillment, including companies such as YourMechanic, Wrench, SQKY, Filld and RepairPal. Our 360 Repair Services has been de-emphasized for the consumer since the middle of 2018 and we are assessing the future direction of this offering. We continue to offer simple maintenance services.
Many of these competitors do not include transportation of the vehicle for servicing but bring the service to the vehicle. We believe this limits the scope of services that can be provided and also poses significant logistical challenges in busy urban environments that are likely to limit the ability to grow such operations. Moreover, our approach to consolidating such support services in parallel with our short-term and long-term parking solutions creates a simpler “one stop shop” experience which we believe is attractive to time-pressed consumers and businesses.
● 
B2B Automotive Logistics and Transport — Our B2B offering competes directly with other automotive logistics and transport companies such as RedCap, MyKarma and Stratim (formerly Zirx). These companies, like us, seek to work with OEMs, dealers, car sharing programs, and other automotive companies to assist in the management of fleet transportation and servicing.
Many of these B2B competitors, including Stratim and RedCap, rely on third-party firms to provide independent contractors to ultimately fulfill their vehicle transportation services. Unlike these competitors, we are investing in our own employee-based workforce which not only increases the speed at which we can respond to the needs of our B2B clients, but we also believe that it is critically important for attracting the best talent and ensuring the highest levels of reliability. Moreover, our B2B clients enjoy the security of a clear vendor relationship, which avoids the uncertainties associated with independent contractor relationships. We believe our unique B2C value proposition and services supports confidence in our value as a logistics partner as well as provides additional opportunities to partner with us as a lead generation partner for new business.
Government Regulation
Other than to maintain our corporate good standing in the jurisdictions in which we operate and laws and regulations affecting employers generally, we do not believe we are currently subject to any direct material government regulations or oversight. We do not own the vehicles that are used in our business service (other than the vehicles we own to deploy valets), nor do we currently own any of the facilities used to store or service such vehicles. Although various jurisdictions and government agencies are considering implementing legislation in response to the rise of other ride- and car-sharing enterprises, such as Uber Technologies Inc., currently no such legislation exists that we believe has jurisdiction over, or applicability to, our operations.

ITEM 1A –ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risk factors set forth in our most recent annual and quarterly filings with the SEC before purchasing our securities. The risks and uncertainties we have described are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our operations. The occurrence of any of these risks might cause you to lose all or part of your investment in the offered securities.
Risks Related to the AYRO Merger
There is no assurance when or if the AYRO Merger will be completed. Any delay in completing the AYRO Merger may substantially reduce the intended benefits that we and AYRO expect to obtain from the AYRO Merger.
Completion of the AYRO Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions, as set forth in the AYRO Merger Agreement, including the approval by our stockholders, approval by Nasdaq of our application for initial listing of our common stock in connection with the AYRO Merger, and other customary closing conditions. There can be no assurance that we and AYRO will be able to satisfy the closing conditions or that closing conditions beyond our control will be satisfied or waived. If the conditions are not satisfied or waived, the AYRO Merger may not occur or will be delayed, and we and AYRO each may lose some or all of the intended benefits of the AYRO Merger. In addition, if the AYRO Merger Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, we or AYRO may be required to pay a termination fee of $1,000,000. Moreover, we and AYRO have incurred and expect to continue to incur significant expenses related to the AYRO Merger, such as legal and accounting fees, some of which must be paid even if the AYRO Merger is not completed.
In addition, if the AYRO Merger Agreement is terminated and our or AYRO’s board of directors determines to seek another business combination, we may not be able to find a third party willing to provide equivalent or more attractive consideration than the consideration to be provided by us and AYRO in the AYRO Merger. In such circumstances, DropCar’s board of directors ( the “Board of Directors”) may elect to, among other things, divest all or a portion of our business, or take the steps necessary to liquidate all of our business and assets, and in either such case, the consideration that we receive may be less attractive than the consideration we receive pursuant to the AYRO Merger Agreement.
The issuance of shares of our common stock to AYRO stockholders in the AYRO Merger will substantially dilute the voting power of our current stockholders. Having a minority share position may reduce the influence that current stockholders have on our management.

Pursuant to the terms of the AYRO Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the AYRO Merger, we will issue approximately 41,927,211 pre-reverse stock split shares of our common stock to AYRO equity holders as merger consideration, including shares to be issued in respect of the sale by AYRO prior to the AYRO Merger of shares of AYRO common stock (or common stock equivalents) representing an aggregate of 16.55% of the outstanding common stock of the combined company after giving effect to the AYRO Merger and warrants to purchase an equivalent number of shares of AYRO common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $2.0 million (the “AYRO Private Placement”) shares and upon conversion of the bridge loans immediately prior to the closing of the AYRO Merger. As a result, assuming the conversion of all shares of our preferred stock into common stock and the exercise of the  pre-funded warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,750,000 shares of AYRO common stock at an exercise price of $0.0001 per whole share (the “Pre-funded Warrants”), upon completion of the AYRO Merger, our current stockholders will hold 9,902,276 pre-reverse stock split shares, or approximately 18.0% of the issued and outstanding equity; former AYRO stockholders will own 43,458,376 pre-reverse stock split shares, or approximately 79.0% of the issued and outstanding equity in our common stock, in each case, excluding certain warrants, options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”); and the financial advisor to us and AYRO will own approximately 1,650,329 pre-reverse stock split shares, or approximately 3% of our outstanding equity. Accordingly, the issuance of the shares of our common stock to AYRO equity holders in the AYRO Merger will significantly reduce the ownership stake and relative voting power of each share of our common stock held by our current stockholders. Consequently, following the AYRO Merger, the ability of our current stockholders to influence the management of the company will be substantially reduced.



Because the lack of a public market for AYRO common stock makes it difficult to evaluate the fairness of the AYRO Merger, AYRO stockholders may receive consideration in the AYRO Merger that is greater than or less than the fair market value of AYRO common stock.
The outstanding capital stock of AYRO is privately held and is not traded in any public market. The lack of a public market makes it extremely difficult to determine the fair market value of AYRO shares. Since the percentage of our common stock to be issued to AYRO equity holders was determined based on negotiations between us and AYRO, it is possible that the value of our common stock to be issued in connection with the AYRO Merger will be greater than the fair market value of AYRO shares. Alternatively, it is possible that the value of the shares of our common stock to be issued in connection with the AYRO Merger will be less than the fair market value of AYRO shares.
Our directors and officers and AYRO’s directors and officers may have interests in the AYRO Merger that are different from, or in addition to, those of our stockholders and AYRO stockholders generally that may influence them to support or approve the AYRO Merger.
Our officers and directors and AYRO’s officers and directors may have interests in the AYRO Merger that are different from, or are in addition to, those of our stockholders and AYRO stockholders generally. Effective upon the closing of the AYRO Merger, Mr. Keller and Mr. Smith will be employed by the combined company and receive compensation and other consideration. Three of our current directors, which shall include Joshua Silverman and two other current directors, and all of the current directors of AYRO will be appointed as directors of the combined company after the completion of the AYRO Merger and will receive cash and equity compensation in consideration for such service. All of AYRO’s executive officers are expected to continue to serve as our executive officers after the completion of the AYRO Merger. Each outstanding stock option to acquire shares of AYRO common stock held by executive officers and directors of AYRO will be converted into an option to acquire shares of our common stock. In addition, our directors and executive officers and AYRO’s directors and executive officers also have certain rights to indemnification or to directors’ and officers’ liability insurance that will survive the completion of the AYRO Merger. These interests may have influenced our directors and executive officers and AYRO’s directors and executive officers to support or recommend the proposals presented to our stockholders and AYRO stockholders.
The announcement and pendency of the AYRO Merger could have an adverse effect on our or AYRO’s business, financial condition, results of operations or business prospects.
The announcement and pendency of the AYRO Merger could disrupt our and/or AYRO’s businesses in the following ways, among others:
our or AYRO’s current and prospective employees could experience uncertainty about their future roles within the combined company, and this uncertainty might adversely affect our or AYRO’s ability to retain, recruit and motivate key personnel;
the attention of our or AYRO’s management may be directed towards the completion of the AYRO Merger and other transaction-related considerations and may be diverted from our or AYRO’s day-to-day business operations, as applicable, and matters related to the AYRO Merger may require commitments of time and resources that could otherwise have been devoted to other opportunities that might have been beneficial to us or AYRO, as applicable;
customers, prospective customers, suppliers, collaborators and other third parties with business relationships with us or AYRO may decide not to renew or may decide to seek to terminate, change or renegotiate their relationships with us or AYRO as a result of the AYRO Merger, whether pursuant to the terms of their existing agreements with us or AYRO; and
the market price of our common stock may decline to the extent that the current market price reflects a market assumption that the AYRO Merger will be completed.
Should they occur, any of these matters could adversely affect the businesses of, or harm the financial condition, results of operations or business prospects of, the company or AYRO.

During the pendency of the AYRO Merger, the company or AYRO may not be able to enter into a business combination with another party and will be subject to contractual limitations on certain actions because of restrictions in the AYRO Merger Agreement.
Covenants in the AYRO Merger Agreement impede our or AYRO’s ability to make acquisitions or complete other transactions that are not in the ordinary course of business pending completion of the AYRO Merger, other than the sale of substantially all of our assets pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, the AYRO Private Placement and the issuance of the Pre-funded Warrants to be issued in a nominal stock subscription (the “Nominal Stock Subscription”). As a result, if the AYRO Merger is not completed, we and AYRO may be at a disadvantage to our competitors, respectively. In addition, while the AYRO Merger Agreement is in effect and subject to limited exceptions, both us and AYRO are prohibited from soliciting, initiating, encouraging or taking actions designed to facilitate any inquiries or the making of any proposal or offer that could lead to the entering into certain extraordinary transactions with any third party, such as a sale of assets, an acquisition, a tender offer, a merger or other business combination outside the ordinary course of business. These restrictions may prevent us and AYRO from pursuing otherwise attractive business opportunities or other capital structure alternatives and making other changes to our business or executing certain of our business strategies prior to the completion of the AYRO Merger, which could be favorable to our stockholders or AYRO stockholders.
Certain provisions of the AYRO Merger Agreement may discourage third parties from submitting competing proposals, including proposals that may be superior to the arrangements contemplated by the AYRO Merger Agreement.
The terms of the AYRO Merger Agreement prohibit each of us and AYRO from soliciting competing proposals or cooperating with persons making unsolicited takeover proposals, except in limited circumstances if our Board of Directors determines in good faith, after consultation with our independent financial advisor, if any, and outside counsel, that an unsolicited competing proposal constitutes, or would reasonably be expected to result in, a superior competing proposal and that failure to take such action would be reasonably likely to result in a breach of the fiduciary duties of our Board of Directors. In addition, if we or AYRO terminate the AYRO Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, including, in our case, terminating because of a decision of our Board of Directors to recommend a superior competing proposal, we or AYRO would be required to pay a termination fee of $1,000,000. This termination fee may discourage third parties from submitting competing proposals to us or our stockholders and may cause our Board of Directors to be less inclined to recommend a competing proposal.
The rights of AYRO stockholders who become our stockholders in the AYRO Merger and our stockholders following the AYRO Merger will be governed by an amended and restated charter and amended and restated bylaws.
Upon consummation of the AYRO Merger, outstanding shares of AYRO common stock will be converted into the right to receive shares of our common stock. AYRO stockholders who receive shares of our common stock in the AYRO Merger will become our stockholders. As a result, AYRO stockholders who become our stockholders will be governed by our organizational documents and bylaws, rather than being governed by AYRO’s organizational documents and bylaws. Pursuant to the AYRO Merger Agreement, our charter will be amended and restated, subject to our stockholders’ approval, and our bylaws will be amended and restated, immediately prior to the effective time of the AYRO Merger.
The Exchange Ratio is not adjustable based on the market price of our common stock, so the merger consideration at the closing may have a greater or lesser value than at the time the AYRO Merger Agreement was signed.
If the AYRO Merger is completed, holders of outstanding shares of AYRO common stock and preferred stock will be entitled to receive 1.1893 shares of our common stock per share of AYRO common stock they hold or into which their shares of preferred stock convert (the “Exchange Ratio”). The AYRO Merger Agreement has set the Exchange Ratio formula for the AYRO common stock, and the Exchange Ratio is only adjustable upward or downward to reflect our and AYRO’s equity capitalization as of immediately prior to the effective time of the AYRO Merger. Any changes in the market price of common stock before the completion of the AYRO Merger will not affect the number of shares AYRO securityholders will be entitled to receive pursuant to the AYRO Merger Agreement. Therefore, if before the completion of the AYRO Merger, the market price of our common stock declines from the market price on the date of the AYRO Merger Agreement, then AYRO securityholders could receive merger consideration with substantially lower value. Similarly, if before the completion of the AYRO Merger, the market price of our common stock increases from the market price on the date of the AYRO Merger Agreement, then AYRO securityholders could receive merger consideration with substantially more value for their shares of AYRO capital stock than had been negotiated for in the establishment of the Exchange Ratio.

If the AYRO Merger does not qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or is otherwise taxable to U.S. AYRO equity holders, then such holders may be required to pay U.S. federal income taxes.
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the AYRO Merger is intended to constitute a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. If the Internal Revenue Services (the “IRS”) or a court determines that the AYRO Merger should not be treated as a reorganization, a holder of AYRO common stock and warrants would recognize taxable gain or loss upon the exchange of AYRO common stock and conversion of warrants for our common stock and warrants pursuant to the AYRO Merger Agreement.
We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, substantial expenses related to the AYRO Merger.
We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur substantial expenses in connection with the AYRO Merger, as well as operating as a public company. We will incur significant fees and expenses relating to legal, accounting, financial advisory and other transaction fees and costs associated with the AYRO Merger. Actual transaction costs may substantially exceed estimates and may have an adverse effect on the combined company’s financial condition and operating results.
Failureresults can be affected by a number of factors, whether currently known or unknown, including but not limited to complete the AYRO Merger could negatively affect the valuethose described below, any one or more of our common stock and the future business and financial results of both us and AYRO.
If the AYRO Merger is not completed, our ongoing businesses and AYRO’s ongoing business, as the case may be, could be adversely affected and we and AYRO will be subject to a variety of risks associated with the failure to complete the AYRO Merger, including without limitation the following:
diversion of management focus and resources from operational matters and other strategic opportunities while working to implement the AYRO Merger;
reputational harm due to the adverse perception of any failure to successfully complete the AYRO Merger; and
having to pay certain costs relating to the AYRO Merger, such as legal, accounting, financial advisory, filing and printing fees.
If the AYRO Merger is not completed, these risks could materially affect the market price of our common stock and the business and financial results of both us and AYRO.
The AYRO Merger is expected to result in a limitation on the combined company’s ability to utilize its net operating loss carryforward.
Under Section 382 of the Code, use of our net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) will be limited if we experience a cumulative change in ownership of greater than 50% in a moving three-year period. We will experience an ownership change as a result of the AYRO Merger and therefore our ability to utilize our NOLs and certain credit carryforwards remaining at the effective time of the AYRO Merger will be limited. The limitation will be determined by the fair market value of our common stock outstanding prior to the ownership change, multiplied by the applicable federal rate. It is expected that the AYRO Merger will impose a limitation on our NOLs. Limitations imposed on our ability to utilize NOLs could cause U.S. federal and state income taxes to be paid earlier than would be paid if such limitations were not in effect and could cause such NOLs to expire unused, in each case reducing or eliminating the benefit of such NOLs.
The opinion received by our Board of Directors from Gemini has not been, and is not expected to be, updated to reflect changes in circumstances that may have occurred since the date of the opinion.
At a meeting held on December 18, 2019, our financial advisor, Gemini, rendered its opinion as to the fairness of the merger consideration from a financial point of view to the company as of the date of such opinion, and such opinion was one of many factors considered by our Board of Directors in approving the AYRO Merger. The opinion does not speak as of the time the AYRO Merger will be completed or any date other than the date of such opinion. Subsequent changes in the operation and prospects of the company or AYRO, general market and economic conditions and other factors that may be beyond the control of the company or AYRO, may significantly alter the value of the company or AYRO or the prices of the shares of our common stock by the time the AYRO Merger is to be completed. The opinion does not address the fairness of the merger consideration from our financial point of view at the time the AYRO Merger is to be completed, or as of any other date other than the date of such opinion, and the AYRO Merger Agreement does not require that the opinion be updated, revised or reaffirmed prior to the closing of the AYRO Merger to reflect any changes in circumstances between the date of the signing of the AYRO Merger Agreement and the completion of the AYRO Merger as a condition to closing the AYRO Merger.

The AYRO Merger may be completed even though material adverse changes may result from the announcement of the AYRO Merger, industry-wide changes or other causes.
In general, the company or AYRO can refuse to complete the AYRO Merger if there is a material adverse change (as defined in the AYRO Merger Agreement) affecting the other party between December 19, 2019, the date of the AYRO Merger Agreement, and the closing of the AYRO Merger. However, some types of changes do not permit either us or AYRO to refuse to complete the AYRO Merger, even if such changes would materially and adversely affect us or AYRO, as the case may be:
changes in general economic, business, financial or market conditions;
changes or events affecting the industries or industry sectors in which we or AYRO operate generally;
changes in generally accepted accounting principles;
changes in laws, rules, regulations, decrees, rulings, ordinances, codes or requirements issued, enacted, adopted or otherwise put into effect by or under the authority of any governmental body;
changes caused by the announcement or pendency of the AYRO Merger;
changes caused by any action taken by either us or AYRO with the prior written consent of the other party;
changes caused by any decision, action, or inaction by governmental or regulatory bodies, with respect to any of our products or AYRO’s products;
changes caused by any act of war, terrorism, national or international calamity or any other similar event;
with respect to us, a decline in our stock price; or
with respect to us, a change in the listing status of our common stock on Nasdaq.
If adverse changes occur but we and AYRO must still complete the AYRO Merger, the market price of our common stock may suffer.
We and AYRO may become involved in securities litigation or stockholder derivative litigation in connection with the AYRO Merger, and this could divert the attention of our management and AYRO’s management and harm the combined company’s business, and insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover all related costs and damages.
Securities litigation or stockholder derivative litigation frequently follows the announcement of certain significant business transactions, such as the sale of a business division or announcement of a business combination transaction. We and AYRO may become involved in this type of litigation in connection with the AYRO Merger, and the combined company may become involved in this type of litigation in the future. Litigation is often expensive and diverts management’s attention and resources, which could, adversely affectdirectly or indirectly, cause our business, the AYRO businessactual financial condition and the combined company.

Risks Relatedoperating results to the Asset Sale Transaction
While the Asset Sale Transaction is pending, it creates unknown impacts on ourvary materially from past, or from anticipated future, whichfinancial condition and operating results. Any of these factors, in whole or in part, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and resultsstock price. The following discussion of operations.
While the Asset Sale Transaction is pending, it creates unknown impacts on our future. Therefore, our current or potential business partners may decide to delay, defer or cancel entering into new business arrangements with us pending consummation of the Asset Sale Transaction. The occurrence of these events individually or in combination could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The failure to consummate the Asset Sale Transaction may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Asset Sale Transaction is subject to various closing conditions including, among others: (i) the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote on the approval of the asset sale proposal and (ii) the consummation of a change in control transaction of our company, which will occur as a result of the AYRO Merger. We cannot control these conditions and cannot assure you that they will be satisfied. If the Asset Sale Transaction is not consummated, werisk factors contains forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements.” These risk factors may be subjectimportant to a number of risks, including the following:
we may not be able to consummate the AYRO Merger, the closing of which is conditioned upon the consummation of the Asset Sale Transaction;
we may not be able to identify an alternate transaction, or if an alternate transaction is identified, such alternate transaction may not result in equivalent terms as compared to what is proposed in the Asset Sale Transaction;
the trading price of our common stock may decline to the extent that the current market price reflects a market assumption that the Asset Sale Transaction will be consummated;
the failure to complete the Asset Sale Transaction may create doubt as to our ability to effectively implement our current business strategies;
our costs related to the Asset Sale Transaction, such as legal, accounting and financial advisory fees, must be paid even if the Asset Sale Transaction is not completed; and
our relationships with our customers, suppliers and employees may be damaged and our business may be harmed.
The occurrence of any of these events individually orunderstanding other statements in combination could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, which could cause the market value of our common stock to decline.
Some of our executive officers have interests in the Asset Sale Transaction that may be in addition to, or different from, the interests of our stockholders.
Stockholders should be aware that our executive officers have financial interests in the Asset Sale Transaction that may be in addition to, or different from, the interests of our stockholders generally. Each of Mr. Richardson and Mr. Newman is a party to the Asset Purchase Agreement. Our Board of Directors was aware of and considered these potential interests, among other matters, in evaluating and negotiating the Asset Sale Transaction and Asset Purchase Agreement and in recommending to our stockholders that they approve the asset sale proposal.
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Risks Related to Our Business Prior to the Consummation of the AYRO Merger

We have a history of losses and have never been profitable. We expect to incur additional losses in the future and may never be unable to achieveprofitable.

We have never been profitable or sustain profitability.

generated positive cash flow from our operations. We have incurred a net lossesloss in each year since our inception in 2016 and have generated limited revenues since inception, principally as a result of our investments in building infrastructure in support of our manufacturing and business operations and plans for growth. We experienced net losses of approximately $10.8 million and $8.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. As of December 31, 2019,2020, we havehad an accumulated deficit of $34.7approximately $25.2 million. SuchWe may incur significant additional losses are continuingas we continue to date.focus our resources on scaling up our operations for growth and incur significant future expenditures for research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses, capital expenses and working capital fluctuations.

Our ability to generate revenue and achieve profitability depends mainly upon our ability, alone or with others, to successfully market our products to meet the market demand and maintain compliance with the rules, regulations and laws of federal, state, local and international governmental bodies. We do not know ifmay be unable to achieve any or all of these goals with regard to our businessproducts. Our future vehicle roadmap requires significant investment prior to commercial introduction, but these vehicles may never be successfully designed, engineered, manufactured or sold. Moreover, scaling up of our operations, launching additional products and expanding our sales territories will become profitable or if werequire significant additional investment. We will continue to incur net losses in the future. Our management expects to incur significant expenses in the future in connection with the development and expansion of our business, which will make it difficult for us to achieve and maintain future profitability. We may incur significant losses in the future for a number of reasons, including the other risks described herein, and we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown events. Accordingly, there can be no certainty regarding if or when we will achieve profitability, or ifuntil such profitability will be sustained.


Historical losses and negative cash flows from operations raise doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Historically, we have suffered losses and have not generated positive cash flows from operations. This raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The audit report of Friedman LLP for the year ended December 31, 2019 on our financial statements contained an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
We have a limited operating history which makes it difficult to predict future growth and operating results.
We have a relatively short operating history which makes it difficult to reliably predict future growth and operating results. We face all the risks commonly encountered by other businesses that lack an established operating history, including, without limitation, the need for additional capital and personnel and intense competition. There is no relevant history upon which to base any assumption as to the likelihoodtime that our business will be successful.
We will require substantial additional funding, which may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all.
We have historically used substantial funds to developvehicle sales volume supports our VAL platform and will require substantial additional funds to continue to develop our VAL platform and expand into new markets. Our future capital requirements and the period for which we expect our existing resources to support our operations may vary significantly from what we expect. Our monthly spending levels vary based on new and ongoing technology developments and corporate activities. To date, we have primarily financed our operations through sales of our securities. We may intend to seek additional funding in the future through equity or debt financings, credit or loan facilities or a combination of one or more of these financing sources. Our ability to raise additional funds will depend on financial, economic and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Additional funds may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all.
If we raise additional funds by issuing equity or convertible debt securities, our stockholders will suffer dilution and the terms of any financing may adversely affect the rights of these stockholders. In addition, as a condition to providing us with additional funds, future investors may demand, and may be granted, rights superior to those of existing stockholders. Debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants limiting our flexibility in conducting future business activities, and, in the event of insolvency, debt holders would be repaid before holders of equity securities received any distribution of corporate assets.
Because our VAL platform operates in a relatively new market, we must actively seek market acceptance of our services, which we expect will occur gradually, if at all.
We derive, and expect to continue to derive, a substantial portion of our revenue from our VAL platform, which is part of a relatively new and evolving market. Our services are substantially different from existing valet, parking, maintenance and car storage services and many potential clients may be reluctant to utilize our services until they have been tested in more established commercial operations over a significant period.underlying overhead costs. As a result, we may have difficulty achieving market acceptance fornever be profitable or achieve significant and/or sustained revenues. Even if we are successful in generating revenue and increasing our platform. Ifcustomer base, we may not become profitable in the future or may be unable to maintain any profitability achieved if we fail to increase our revenue and manage our operating expenses or if we incur unanticipated liabilities.

The market for our services fails to grow or grows more slowly than we currently anticipate, our business would be negatively affected.


Future growth may place significant demands on our management and infrastructure.
Our businessproducts is logistically and technologically complex. This complexity has placeddeveloping and may continue to place significantnot develop as expected.

The market for our electric vehicles is developing and may not develop as expected by us. The market for alternative fuel vehicles is relatively new, rapidly evolving, characterized by rapidly changing technologies, price competition, additional competitors, evolving multi-level government regulations and industry standards, frequent new vehicle announcements and changing consumer demands on our management and our operationalbehaviors. The electric vehicle market is in its early stage where many standards and financial infrastructure,best practices have not been established or are constantly evolving, and it may be challengingtake many years for the market to sustainfully mature.

We believe our future success will depend in future growth periods. Many of our systems and operational practices were implemented when the company was at a smaller scale of operations. In addition, as we grow, we must implement new systems and software to help run our operations and must hire additional personnel. As our operations grow in size, scope and complexity, we will need to continue to improve and upgrade our systems and infrastructure to offer an increasing number of clients enhanced services, solutions and features. We may choose to commit significant financial, operational and technical resources in advance of an expected increase in the volume of our business, with no assurance that the volume of business will increase. Growth could also strainlarge part on our ability to maintain reliable service levels for existingquickly and new clients, which could adversely affect our reputation and business inefficiently adapt to both the future. For example, in the past, we have experienced, and may in the future experience, situations where themarket demand for products and features, as well as adapt to newly created statutory laws at federal, state, local and international levels. Due to the nature of the electronic vehicle market still in development, it is difficult to predict the demands for our electric vehicles and ancillary services exceededand products, as well as the size and growth rate for this market, the entry of competitive products, or the success of existing competitive products. If a meaningful market for our estimates and our employee base was, and may in the future be, insufficient to support this higher demand. Our client experience and overall reputation could be harmed ifvehicles does not develop, we are unable to grow our employee base to support higher demand.

Competition for staffing, shortages of qualified drivers and union activity may increase our labor costs and reduce profitability.
If our labor costs increase, we maywill not be able to raise rates to offset these increased costs. Union activity is another factor that may contribute to increased labor costs. We currently do not have any union employees, and any increase in labor union activity could have a significant impact on our labor costs. Our failure to recruit and retain qualified drivers, or to control our labor costs, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
Deterioration in economic conditions in general could reduce the demand for our services and damage our business and results of operations.
Adverse changes in global, national and local economic conditions could negatively impact our business. Our business operations are concentrated and will likely continue to be concentrated in large urban areas, and business could be materially adversely affected to the extent that weak economic conditions result in the elimination of jobs and high unemployment in these large urban areas. If deteriorating economic conditions reduce discretionary spending, business travel or other economic activity that fuels demand for our services, our earnings could be reduced. Adverse changes in local and national economic conditions could also depress prices for our services or cause individual and/or corporate clients to cancel their agreements to purchase our services. Moreover, mandated changes in local and/or national compensation as it relates to minimum wage, overtime, and other compensation regulations may have an adverse impact on our profitability.
successful.

Our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely impacted by public health epidemics, including the recent coronavirus outbreak

outbreak.

Our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely impacted if a public health epidemic, including the recent coronavirus outbreak, interferes with our ability, or the ability of our employees, workers, contractors, suppliers and other business partners to perform our and their respective responsibilities and obligations relative to the conduct of our business. A public health epidemic, including the coronavirus, poses the risk of disruptions from the temporary closure of third-party suppliers and manufacturers, restrictions on our employees'employees’ and other service providers'providers’ ability to travel, the decreased willingness or ability of our customers to test drive or purchase our vehicles and shutdowns that may be requested or mandated by governmental authorities. Our business, results of operations and financial condition have been adversely impacted by the recent coronavirus outbreak both in China and the United States. This has delayed our ability to timely procure raw materials from our supplier in China, which, in turn, has delayed shipments to and corresponding revenue from customers. The pandemic and social distancing directives have interfered with our ability, or the ability of our employees, workers, contractors, suppliers and other business partners to perform our and their respective responsibilities and obligations relative to the conduct of our business. The COVID-19 pandemic epidemic poses restrictions on our employees’ and other service providers’ ability to travel on pre-sales meetings, customers’ abilities to physically meet with our employees and the ability of our customers to test drive or to utilizepurchase our servicesvehicles and shutdowns that may be requested or mandated by governmental authorities. The extent to which the coronavirus may continue to impact our results will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the coronavirus and the actions to contain the coronavirus or treat its impact, among others.

We expect to face intense competition in the market for innovative logistics, valet and car storage services, and our business will suffer if we fail to compete effectively.
While we believe that our platform offers a number of advantages over existing service providers, we expect that the competitive environment for our logistics, valet and storage services will become more intense as companies enter the market. In addition, there are relatively low barriers to entry into our business. Currently, our primary competitors are public transportation, logistics, traditional valet and car storage providers, car sharing services and traditional rental car companies that have recently begun offering more innovative services. Many of our competitors have greater name recognition among our target clients and greater financial, technical and/or marketing resources than we have.

Our competitors have resources that may enable them to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in client preferences. These competitors could introduce new solutions with competitive prices or undertake more aggressive marketing campaigns than us. Failure to compete effectively could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.


Our long-term sustainability relies on our ability to anticipate or keep pace with changes in the marketplace and the direction of technological innovation and customer demands.
The automotive industry, especially the vehicle support segment of the automotive industry in which we operate, is subject to intense and increasing competition and rapidly evolving technologies. We believe that the automotive industry will experience significant and continued change in the coming years. In addition to traditional competitors, we must also be responsive to the entrance of non-traditional participants in the automotive industry. These non-traditional participants, such as ride-sharing companies and autonomous vehicles, may seek to disrupt the historic business model of the industry through the introduction of new technologies, new products or services, new business models or new methods of travel. To compete successfully, we will need to demonstrate the advantages of our services over alternative solutions and services, as well as newer technologies. Failure to adapt to innovations in technology and service offerings in the automotive space could have a material adverse impact on our ability to sustain our business and remain competitive.
Our growth depends on our ability to gain sustained access to a sufficient number of parking locations on commercially reasonable terms that offer convenient access in reaching our clients.
We currently operate Self-park in New York City. We must therefore compete for limited parking locations. Many cities are densely populated, and parking locations may not be available at locations that provide convenient access to our clients or on terms that are commercially reasonable. If we are unable to gain sustained access to a sufficient number of parking locations that are convenient to our clients, our ability to attract and retain clients will suffer. This challenge of finding adequate parking will grow if we are able to successfully grow our subscriber base. If we are unable to gain sustained access to a sufficient number of parking locations, or we are unable to gain such access on commercially reasonable terms, this could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we fail to successfully execute our growth strategy,operating history makes evaluating our business and prospects difficult and may be materially and adversely affected.
To date, we primarily operateincrease the risk of any investment in the New York metropolitan area. our securities.

Our growth strategy includes expanding our services to new geographic locations, which may not succeed due to various factors, including one or more of the following: competition, our inability to build brand name recognition in these new markets, our inability to effectively market our services in these new markets or our inability to deliver high-quality services on a cost-effective, continuous and consistent basis. In addition, we may be unable to identify new cities with sufficient growth potential to expand our network, and we may fail to attract quality drivers and other employees and/or establish the necessary commercial relationships with local vendors that are required in order to deliver our services in these areas. If we fail to successfully execute our growth strategy, we may be unable to maintain and grow our business operation, andlimited operating history makes evaluating our business and prospects difficult and may be materially and adversely affected.

We may experience difficulties demonstrating the value to customers of newer, higher priced and higher margin services if they believe existing services are adequate to meet end customer expectations.
As we develop and introduces new services, we facesincrease the risk that customers may not value or be willing to purchase these higher priced and higher margin services due to pricing constraints. Owing to the extensive time and resources that we invest in developing new services, if we are unable to sell customers new services, our revenue could decline and our business, financial condition,of your investment. Our operating results have fluctuated in the past and cash flows could be negatively affected.

If effortsmay fluctuate significantly in the future, which makes it difficult to buildpredict our future operating results. Any substantial adjustment to overhead expenses to account for lower levels of sales is difficult and maintain strong brand identity are not successful,takes time, thus we may not be able to attractreduce our costs sufficiently to compensate for a shortfall in net sales, and even a small shortfall in net sales could disproportionately and adversely affect our operating margin and operating results for a given period.

Our operating results may also fluctuate due to a variety of other factors, many of which are outside our control, including the changing and volatile local, national, and international economic environments. Besides the other risks in this “Risk Factors” section, factors that may affect our operations include:

fluctuations in demand for our products;
the inherent complexity, length, and associated unpredictability of product development windows and product lifecycles;
changes in customers’ budgets for technology purchases and delays in their purchasing cycles;
changes in customer preferences;
changing market conditions;
any significant changes in the competitive dynamics of our markets, including new entrants or further consolidation;
our ability to continue to broaden our customer and dealer base beyond our traditional customers and dealers;
our ability to broaden our geographical markets;
the timing of product releases or upgrades by us or our competitors; and
our ability to develop, introduce, and ship in a timely manner new products and product enhancements and anticipate future market demands that meet customers’ requirements.

Each of these factors individually, or retain clients,the cumulative effect of two or more of these factors, could result in large fluctuations in our quarterly and annual operating results. As a result, comparing our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful, and our operating results for any given period may fall below expectations or our guidance. You should not rely on our past results as an indication of future performance.

If we are unable to effectively implement or manage our growth strategy, our operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

Our ability to generate and grow revenue will depend, in part, on our ability to execute our business plan, expand our business model and develop new products in a timely manner. As part of our growth strategy, we may modify our distribution channels and engage in strategic transactions with third parties to access additional sales and distribution channels and accelerate product adoption for particular vertical markets, open new manufacturing, research or engineering facilities or expand our existing facilities. We also plan to add additional product lines and expand our businesses into new geographical markets. There is a range of risks inherent in such a strategy that could adversely affect our ability to successfully achieve these objectives, including, but not limited to, the following:

the potential failure to successfully operate our dealer-distribution channels;
an inability to attract and retain customers, employees, suppliers and/or marketing partners;
the uncertainty that we may not be able to generate, anticipate or meet consumer demand;
the potential disruption of our business;
the increased scope and complexity of our operations could require significant attention from management and impose constraints on our operations or other projects;
inconsistencies between our standards, procedures and policies and those of new points of sale or dealerships and costs or inefficiencies associated with the integration of our operational and administrative systems, if necessary;
unforeseen expenses, delays or conditions, including the potential for increased regulatory compliance or other third-party approvals or consents, or provisions in contracts with third parties that could limit our flexibility to take certain actions;
the costs of compliance with local laws and regulations and the implementation of compliance processes, as well as the assumption of unexpected labilities, litigation, penalties or other enforcement actions;
the uncertainty that new product lines or ancillary services will generate anticipated sales;
the uncertainty that the expanded operations will achieve anticipated operating results;
the difficulty of managing the operations of a larger company;
the difficulty of competing for growth opportunities with companies that have greater financial resources than us; and
the ability of our suppliers to support consumer demand.

Any one of these factors could impair our growth strategy, result in delays, increased costs or decreases in the amount of expected revenues derived from our growth strategy and could adversely impact our prospects, business, financial condition or results of operations.

A significant portion of our revenues are derived from a single customer. If we were to lose this customer, our sales could decrease significantly.

In March 2019, we entered the MPA with Club Car, which grants Club Car the exclusive right to sell the AYRO 411 Fleet in North America, provided that Club Car orders at least 500 AYRO vehicles per year. For the year ended December 31, 2020, revenues from Club Car constituted approximately 68% of our revenues as compared to 75% in 2019. For the year 2021, a majority of our revenue is projected to be generated from Club Car pursuant to the MPA. We are therefore highly dependent on a single customer to generate a material percentage of our annual revenues, and the lack of adoption, failure to achieve reasonable “sell through” rates by the customer’s dealers, unfavorable dealer/customer experience or discontinuation or modification of terms may materially and adversely affect our sales and results of operations. Any loss of, or a significant reduction in purchases by, Club Car that constitutes a significant portion of our sales could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

Our future growth depends on customers’ willingness to adopt electric vehicles.

If there is lower market demand for our electric vehicles than we expect in the target markets, which include universities, food delivery services, last mile delivery service, municipalities and on-road and personal transportation, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results will be negatively impacted. Potential customers may be reluctant to adopt electric vehicles as an alternative to traditional internal combustion engine vehicles or other electric vehicles due to various factors, which include but are not limited to:

perceptions or negative publicity about electric vehicle quality, dependability, safety, stability of lithium-ion battery packs, utility, performance and cost regarding our vehicles or electric vehicles sold by other manufacturers, especially if accidents or certain events create a negative public perception;
local, regional, national and international investment in charging infrastructure, standardization of electric vehicle charging systems and cost of charging that may impact adaptability for the overall electric vehicle market;
the limited range of the vehicle on a single battery charge cycle;
the impact of driving habits and terrain on the battery life, especially the differences with internal combustion engines;
the deterioration rate of the battery packs that are impacted by many external factors, including, but not limited to, overall life, environmental conditions, dormant time, and number of lifetime charge cycles and these factors’ impacts on the batteries’ ability to maintain an adequate charge;
the access to knowledgeable service locations to support our electric vehicles;
the price of alternative fuel sources, such as gasoline as an alternative to the cost of charging electricity; and
the availability of governmental incentive and tax deductions and credits offered to consumers for purchasing and using electric vehicles.

Any of the above factors may hinder widespread adoption of electric vehicles and influence prospective customers and dealers to decide not to purchase our electric vehicles. Such issues would have an adverse material effect on our consolidated financial statements of operations, financial conditions, ability to develop strategic partnerships and ability to raise additional funding. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic may negatively impact the transportation and automotive industries and consumer behavior long-term.

We may experience lower-than-anticipated market acceptance of our current models and the vehicles in development.

Our projected growth depends upon the end-consumers’ mass adoption of our purpose-built electric vehicles. Although we have conducted some market research regarding our electric vehicles we currently sell or are developing, many factors both within and outside our control affect the success of our vehicles in the marketplace. At this time, it is difficult to measure consumers’ willingness to adopt purpose-built electric vehicles, particularly two-passenger electric vehicles. Offering fuel-efficient vehicles that consumers want and value can mitigate the risks of increasing price competition and declining demand, but vehicles that are perceived to be less desirable (whether in terms of price, quality, styling, safety, overall value, or other attributes) can exacerbate these risks. For example, if a new vehicle encountered quality issues at the time of launch, the vehicle’s perceived quality could be affected even after the issues had been corrected, resulting in lower than anticipated sales volumes, market share, and profitability. Moreover, if a new vehicle is not accepted by consumers based on size, styling, or other attributes, we would experience lower than anticipated sales volumes, market share, and profitability. If our vehicles are not adopted or there is a reduction in demand for our products caused by a lack of customer acceptance, a slowdown in demand for electronic transportation solutions, battery safety concerns, technological challenges, battery life issues, competing technologies and products, decreases in discretionary spending, weakening economic conditions, or otherwise, the reduction in demand could result in reduced customer orders, early order cancellations, the loss of customers, or decreased sales, any of which would adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.

If we are unable to manage our growth and expand our operations successfully, our business and operating results will be harmed, and our reputation may be adversely affected.

damaged.

We believehave been expanding our operations significantly since our inception and anticipate that buildingfurther significant expansion will be required to achieve our business objectives. The growth and maintaining our brand is critical to the successexpansion of our business. Consumer clientbusiness and automotive awarenessproduct offerings places a continuous and significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources. Any such future growth would also add complexity to and require effective coordination throughout our organization. Our future operating results depend to a large extent on our ability to manage this expansion and growth successfully. Risks that we face in undertaking this expansion include:

establishing sufficient sales, service and service facilities in a timely manner;
forecasting production and revenue;
training new personnel;
controlling expenses and investments in anticipation of expanded operations;
establishing or expanding design, manufacturing, sales and service facilities;
implementing and enhancing administrative infrastructure, systems and processes;
addressing new markets;
expanding operations and finding and hiring a significant number of additional personnel, including manufacturing personnel, design personnel, engineers and service technicians; and

securing sub-assemblies and other raw materials from our suppliers to support growth.

In this regard, we will be required to continue to improve our operational, financial and management controls and our reporting procedures, and we may not be able to successfully implement improvements to these systems and processes in a timely or efficient manner, which could result in additional operating inefficiencies and could cause our costs to increase more than planned. If we do increase our operating expenses in anticipation of the brandgrowth of our business and its perceived valuethis growth does not meet our expectations, our operating results and gross margin will depend largely on the success of marketing efforts and thebe negatively impacted. If we are unable to manage future expansion, our ability to provide a consistent, high-quality client and business experience. Conversely, any failure to maximize marketing opportunities or to provide clients with high-quality valet, logistics, maintenance and storage experiences for any reason could substantially harm our reputation and adversely affect our efforts to develop as a trusted brand. To promote our brand, we have made, and will continue to make, substantial investments relating to advertising, marketing and other efforts, but cannot be sure that such investment will be successful.

Furthermore, as the primary point of contact with clients, we rely on our drivers to provide clients and business partners with a high-quality client experience. The failure of our drivers to provide clients and business partners with this trusted experience could cause customers and business partners to turn to alternative providers, including our competitors. Any incident that erodes consumer affinity for our brand, including a negative experience with one of our valets or damage to a customer’s car could result in negative publicity, negative online reviews and damage our business.
We rely on third-party service providers to provide parking garages for our clients’ cars. If these service providers experience operational difficulties or disruptions, our businesshigh quality products could be adversely affected.
We depend on third-party service providers to provide parking garages for our clients’ cars. In particular, we rely on local parking garage vendors to provide adequate convenient parking locations. We do not control the operation of these providers. If these third-party service providers terminate their relationship with us, decide to sell their facilities or do not provide convenient access to our clients’ vehicles, it would be disruptive to our business, as we are dependent on suitable parking locations within relative proximity of our clients’ residences and business locations. This disruption could harmharmed, damage our reputation and brand and may cause us to lose clients.
If we are unsuccessful in establishing or maintaining our business-to-business (B2B) model, our revenue growth could be adversely affected.
We currently depend on corporate clients and the B2B market for a significant portion of our revenue. The success of this strategy will depend on our ability to maintain existing B2B partners, obtain new B2B partners, and generate a community of participating corporate clients sufficiently large to support such a model. We may not be successful in establishing such partnerships on terms that are commercially favorable, if at all, and may encounter financial and logistical difficulties associated with sustaining such partnerships. If we are unsuccessful in establishing or maintaining our B2B model, our revenue growth could be adversely affected.
We face risks related to liabilities resulting from the use of client vehicles by our employees.
Our business can expose us to claims for property damage, personal injury and death resulting from the operation and storage of client cars by our drivers. While operating client cars, drivers could become involved in motor vehicle accidents due to mechanical or manufacturing defects, or user error by our employed driver or by a third-party driver that results in death or significant property damage for which we may be liable.
In addition, we depend on our drivers to inspect the vehicles prior to driving in order to identify any potential damage or safety concern with the vehicle. To the extent that we are found at fault or otherwise responsible for an accident, our insurance coverage would only cover losses up to a maximum of $5 million, in certain instances, in the United States.
We may experience difficulty obtaining coverage for certain insurable risks or obtaining such coverage at a reasonable cost.
We maintain insurance for workers’ compensation, general liability, automobile liability, property damage and other insurable risks. We are responsible for claims exceeding our retained limits under our insurance policies, and while we endeavor to purchase insurance coverage corresponding to our assessment of risk, we cannot predict with certainty the frequency, nature or magnitude of claims or direct or consequential damages and may become exposed to liability at levels in excess of our historical levels resulting from unusually high losses or otherwise. Additionally, consolidation of entities in the insurance industry could impact our ability to obtain or renew policies at competitive rates, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, as would the incurrence of uninsured claims or the inability or refusal of our insurance carriers to pay otherwise insured claims. Any material changes in our insurance costs due to changes in frequency of claims, the severity of claims, the costs of premiums or for any other reason could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial position, results of operations,condition.

Developments in alternative technologies or cash flows.


Our success dependsimprovements in the internal combustion engine may have a materially adverse effect on the continued reliabilitydemand for our electric vehicles.

Significant developments related to ethanol or compressed natural gas, or improvements in the fuel economy of the internet infrastructure.

Our services are designed primarily to work over the internet,internal combustion engine or hybrids, may materially and the success of our platform is largely dependent on the development and maintenance of the internet infrastructure, along with our clients’ access to low-cost, high-speed internet. The future delivery of our services will depend on third-party internet service providers to expand high-speed internet access, to maintain a reliable network with the necessary speed, data capacity and security, and to develop complementary products and services for providing reliable and timely internet access. Any outages or delays resulting from damage to the internet infrastructure, including problems caused by viruses, malware and similar programs, could reduce clients’ access to the internet and our services and could adversely impact our business.
System interruptions that impair access to our website or mobile application could substantially harmaffect our business and operating results.
The satisfactory performance, reliabilityprospects in ways we do not currently anticipate. For example, types of fuel that are abundant and availability of our websiterelatively inexpensive in North America, such as compressed natural gas, may emerge as consumers’ preferred alternative to petroleum-based propulsion. If alternative energy engines or low gasoline prices make existing four-wheeled vehicles with greater passenger and mobile application, which enable clientscargo capacities less expensive to access our services, are critical to our business. Any systems interruption that prevents clients and visitors from accessing our website and mobile App could result in negative publicity, damage to our reputation and brand and could cause our business and operating results to suffer. We may experience system interruptions for a variety of reasons, including network failures, power outages, cyber-attacks, problems caused by viruses and similar programs, software errors or an overwhelming number of clients or visitors trying to reach our website during periods of strong demand. Because we are dependent in part on third parties for the implementation and maintenance of certain aspects of our systems and because some of the causes of system interruptions may be outside of our control,operate, we may not be able to remedycompete with manufacturers of such interruptionsvehicles. Furthermore, given the rapidly changing nature of the electric vehicle market, there can be no assurance that our vehicles and technology will not be rendered obsolete by alternative or competing technologies. Any material change in a timely manner,the existing technologies may cause delays in our development and introduction of new or at all. Any significant disruption to our website, mobile application or internal computer systemsupgraded vehicles, which could result in athe loss of clients and adversely affectcompetitiveness of our business and results of operations.
If we are unable to protect confidential client information, our reputation may be harmed, and we may be exposed to liabilityvehicles, decreased revenue and a loss of clients.
Our system stores, processesmarket share to competitors.

The markets in which we operate are highly competitive, and transmits confidential client information, including location information and other sensitive data. We rely on encryption, authentication and other technologies to keep this information secure. Wewe may not have adequately assessed the internalbe successful in competing in these industries. We currently face competition from new and external risks posedestablished domestic and international competitors and expect to the security of our systems and may not have implemented adequate preventative safeguards. In the event that the security of our system is compromisedface competition from others in the future, including competition from companies with new technology.

We face significant competition, and there is no assurance that our vehicles will be successful in the respective markets in which they compete. The worldwide vehicle market, particularly for alternative fuel vehicles, is highly competitive today and we mayexpect it will become even more so in the future. Established automobile manufacturers such as General Motors, Ford, Nissan and Toyota, as well as other newer companies such as Tesla, Arcimoto and Electrameccanica, have entered or are reported to have plans to enter the alternative fuel vehicle market, including hybrid, plug-in hybrid and fully electric vehicles. In some cases, such competitors have announced an intention to now or at some point in the future produce electric vehicles exclusively. As the LSEV market grows increasingly saturated, we expect to experience significant competition. The most competitive companies in the global LSEV market include HDK Electric Vehicles, Bradshaw Electric Vehicles, Textron Inc., Polaris Industries, Yamaha Motors Co. Ltd., Ingersoll Rand, Inc., Speedway Electric, AGT Electric Cars, Bintelli Electric Vehicles and Ligier Group. Many of our existing or potential competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and human resources than us, and significantly greater experience in manufacturing, designing and selling electric vehicles, as well as in clearing regulatory requirements of those vehicles in the United States and in foreign countries. Many of our current and potential future competitors also have significantly more experience designing, building and selling electric vehicles at commercial, or fleet, scale. Large automobile or equipment manufacturers with greater purchasing power allow them to acquire raw materials at a much lower cost. Additionally, the large traditional manufacturer has more ready access to efficient design, testing and service facilities. We do not take adequate reactionary measures. Any compromise of information security could expose our confidential client information, damaging our reputation and exposinghave the company history, facilities or capital to costly litigationproperly compete with large traditional manufacturers should they decide to enter our market. Mergers and liability thatacquisitions in the electric vehicle market could result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. Increased competition could result in lower vehicle unit sales, price reductions, revenue shortfalls, loss of customers and loss of market share, which could harm our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

Security breaches, Additionally, industry overcapacity has resulted in many manufacturers offering marketing incentives on vehicles in an attempt to maintain and grow market share; these incentives historically have included a combination of subsidized financing or leasing programs, price rebates, and other incentives. As a result, we are not necessarily able to set our prices to offset higher costs. Continuation of or increased excess capacity could have a substantial adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

New entrants seeking to gain market share by introducing new technology, attractive feature sets, new products and development of longer-life power packs may make it more difficult for us to sell our vehicles and earn design wins which could create increased pricing pressure, reduced profit margins, increased sales and marketing expenses, or the loss of data and other disruptions could compromise sensitive information related tomarket share or expected market share, any of which may significantly harm our business, prevents usoperating results and financial condition.

Our future success depends on our ability to identify additional market opportunities and develop and successfully introduce new and enhanced products that address such markets and meet the needs of customers in such markets.

We may not be able to successfully develop new electric vehicles, address new market segments or develop a broader customer base. We currently sell one four-wheeled truck, from accessing critical information or exposes us to liability, which could adversely affect our business and reputation.

We utilize information technology systems and networks to process, transmit and store electronic information in connection with our business activities. As the use of digital technologies has increased, cyber incidents, including deliberate attacks and attempts to gain unauthorized access to computer systems and networks, have increased in frequency and sophistication. These threats pose a risk to the securityall of our systemsrevenues are derived. We are currently developing our next generation three-wheeled vehicle. Our future success will be dependent on our ability to address additional markets, anticipate our existing and networksprospective customers’ needs and develop new vehicle models that meet those needs. In particular, we are currently developing a new series of automotive-grade autocycles, engineered and optimized to meet targeted use cases such as last mile and urban delivery and are also working on Club Car’s next generation, electric light duty trucks and developing a new purpose-built vehicle with Club Car. We will have to incorporate the latest technological improvements and enhancements into our future vehicles to be able to compete in the rapidly evolving electric vehicle industry and the confidentiality, availability and integrity of our data, all of which are vital to our operations and business strategy.target markets. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in preventing cyber-attacksable to design future models of vehicles, or successfully mitigating their effects.
Despitedevelop future services, that will meet the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems and thoseexpectations of our contract research organizationscustomers or address market demands, or that our future models will achieve market acceptance or become commercially viable.

In order to introduce new products and product enhancements, we will have to coordinate with our suppliers and other contractorsthird parties to design a new model or an enhanced version of an existing model that offer features desired by our customers and consultants are vulnerablea level of performance and functionality or cost-effectiveness superior to damagethe vehicles offered by our competitors. If we fail to coordinate these efforts and achieve market introduction and acceptance of new or disruption from hacking, computer viruses, software bugs, unauthorized access or disclosure, natural disasters, terrorism, war,upgraded vehicles models that address the needs of our customers in a timely manner, our operating results will be materially and telecommunication, equipmentadversely affected, and electrical failures. In addition, there canour business and prospects will be no assurance thatharmed.

Furthermore, we will promptly detect any such disruption or security breach, if at all. Unauthorized access, loss or disseminationneed to address additional markets and expand our customer demographic to further grow our business. Our failure to address additional market opportunities could disruptmaterially harm our operations, includingbusiness, financial condition, operating results and prospects.

If we fail to include key feature sets relative to the target markets for our abilityelectric vehicles, our business will be harmed.

Achieving design wins to conduct research and development activities, process and prepare company financial information, and manage various general and administrative aspectssupport the needs of our target markets is an important success factor for our business. ToIn order to achieve design wins, we must:

anticipate the features and functionality that OEMs, customers and consumers will demand;
successfully incorporate those features and functionalities into products that meet the exacting design requirements of our customers; and
price our products competitively.

Failure to maintain our expertise and inability to deliver custom, specific design systems could harm our business.

Unanticipated changes in industry standards could render our vehicles incompatible with such standards and adversely affect our business.

The emergence of new industry standards and technical requirements could render our vehicles incompatible with vehicles developed by competitors or make it difficult for our products to meet the extent that any such disruptionrequirements of our end-customers. Moreover, the introduction of new industry standards, or security breach resultschanges to existing industry standards, could cause us to incur substantial development costs to adapt to these new or changed standards, particularly if we were to achieve, or be perceived as likely to achieve, greater penetration in the marketplace. If our vehicles are not in compliance with prevailing industry standards and technical requirements for a losssignificant period of or damage to our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure or theft of confidential, proprietary or personal information,time, we could miss opportunities to achieve crucial design wins, our revenue may decline and we may incur liability, suffer reputational damage or poor financial performance or becomesignificant expenses to redesign our vehicles to meet the subject of regulatory actions by state, federal or non-US authorities, any ofrelevant standards, which could adversely affect our business.


Future legislation or regulations maybusiness, results of operations and prospects.

We rely on and intend to continue to rely on a single third-party supplier and manufacturer located in the People’s Republic of China for the sub-assemblies in semi-knocked-down for all of our vehicles. Any disruption in the operations of this third-party supplier could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

As part of our strategy to minimize our capital expenditures on manufacturing infrastructure, we currently rely on Cenntro for the sub-assemblies for the AYRO 411 Fleet vehicles. Cenntro also owns the design of the AYRO 411 Fleet and has granted us an exclusive license to purchase the AYRO 411 Fleet for sale in North America. Our dependence on a single supplier and manufacturer, and the challenges we may face in obtaining adequate supplies and vehicle kits required to assemble our vehicles, involve several risks, including limited control over pricing, availability, quality and delivery schedules.

We cannot be certain that Cenntro will continue to provide us with the quantities of the sub-assembles that we require or satisfy our anticipated specifications and quality requirements. If Cenntro experiences unanticipated delays, disruptions or shutdowns or is unable to ship required raw materials, sub-assemblies, replacement or warranty parts for any reason, within or outside of Cenntro’s control, our manufacturing operations and customer deliveries would be seriously impacted. Although various jurisdictionswe believe we could locate alternative suppliers to fulfill our needs, we may be unable to find a sufficient alternative supply channel in a reasonable time or on commercially reasonable terms or develop our own replacements, especially when we rely on the license granted by Cenntro, who owns the design of the AYRO 411 Fleet. In December 2019, a strain of coronavirus, or COVID-19, was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China, resulting in government-imposed quarantines and government agencies are considering implementing legislationother public health safety measures. The extent to which the coronavirus may impact our operations continues to be uncertain; however, the outbreak and continuous spreading of the coronavirus has caused, and could in responsethe future cause, delays or disruptions in our supply chain and in the delivery of raw materials from Cenntro or our other suppliers located in China, which would be disruptive to the risemanufacturing of the vehicles and would adversely impact our business. In addition, the spreading of the virus may make it more difficult for us in finding alternative manufactures or suppliers due to the high concentration of such manufacturers or suppliers located in China. Any performance failure on the part of Cenntro or any other ride-of our significant suppliers could interrupt production of our vehicles, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and car-sharing enterprises, such as Uber Technologies Inc., currently no such legislation exists that we believe has jurisdiction over, or applicability to, our operations. We do not believe weoperating results.

Additionally, because Cenntro’s factories are subject to any material government regulations or oversight, but regulations impacting parking and traffic patternslocated in the areasPeople’s Republic of our operations could impact the services we provide. We are also subject to various U.S. federal, stateChina, nation-to-nation quarantining and local laws and regulations, including those related to environmental, health and safety, financial, tax, customs and other matters. We cannot predict the substance or impact of pending or future legislation embargo restrictions and/or regulations could be established by either the United States or Chinese governments, precluding us from sourcing the application thereof. The introduction of new lawsraw materials needed in a timely manner. This would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

Unforeseen or regulations or changes in existing laws or regulations, or the interpretations thereof, could increase the costs of doing business for usrecurring operational problems at ours or our clientsprime supplier’s facilities, or otherwise restricta catastrophic loss of ours or our actionsprime supplier’s manufacturing facilities, may cause significant lost or delayed production and adversely affect our financial condition,results of operations.

We import sub-assemblies from Cenntro and perform final assembly, testing and safety qualifications in our facility in Round Rock, Texas in an assembly line process. Our manufacturing process could be affected by operational problems that could impair our production capability and the timeframes within which we expect to produce our vehicles. Disruptions or shutdowns at our assembly facility could be caused by:

maintenance outages to conduct maintenance activities that cannot be performed safely during operations;
pandemics, including the COVID-19 pandemic, and related governmental responses that may restrict our ability to operate;
prolonged power failures or reductions;
breakdown, failure or substandard performance of any of our machines or other equipment;
noncompliance with, and liabilities related to, environmental requirements or permits;
disruptions in the transportation infrastructure, including railroad tracks, bridges, tunnels or roads;
fires, floods, snow or ice storms, earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, microbursts or other catastrophic disasters, national emergencies, political unrest, war or terrorist activities; or
other operational problems.
availability of parts, including both batteries and semiconductors, which are used to produce many components of our vehicles.

If our manufacturing facility or that of our prime supplier is compromised or shut down, we may experience prolonged startup periods, regardless of the reason for the compromise or shutdown. Those startup periods could range from several days to several weeks or longer, depending on the reason for the compromise or shutdown and other factors. Any disruption in operations at our facility could cause a significant loss of production, delays in our ability to produce our vehicles and adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows.

Seasonality may cause fluctuationsnegatively impact our customers. Further, a catastrophic event could result in our financial results.
We generally experience some effectsthe loss of seasonality due to increases in travel during the summer months and holidays such as Thanksgiving and Christmas. Accordingly, the use of all or a portion of our servicesmanufacturing facility. Although we carry property insurance, our coverage may not be adequate to compensate us for all losses that may occur. Any of these events individually or in the aggregate could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and associated revenueoperating results.

We may become subject to product liability claims, which could harm our financial condition and liquidity if we are not able to successfully defend or insure against such claims.

We may become subject to product liability claims, which could harm our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition. The automobile industry experiences significant product liability claims, and we face an inherent risk of exposure to claims in the event our vehicles do not perform as expected or malfunction resulting in personal injury or death. Our risks in this area are particularly pronounced given that our vehicles have generally increaseda limited commercial history. A successful product liability claim against us that exceeds our product liability insurance limits could require us to pay a substantial monetary award. Moreover, a product liability claim could generate substantial negative publicity about our vehicles and business and inhibit or prevent commercialization of other future vehicles, which would have a material adverse effect on our brand, business, prospects and operating results. We maintain product liability insurance for all of our vehicles with annual limits of $10.0 million on a claims-made basis, but any such insurance might not be sufficient to cover all potential product liability claims. Any lawsuit seeking significant monetary damages either in excess of our coverage, or outside of our coverage, may have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business and financial condition. We may not be able to secure additional product liability insurance coverage on commercially acceptable terms or at reasonable costs when needed, particularly if we do face liability for our vehicles and are forced to make a higher rate during such periods. Our revenue also fluctuatesclaim under our policy.

If our vehicles fail to perform as expected due to inclement weather conditions, such as snow or rain storms. This seasonalitydefects, our ability to develop, market and sell our electric vehicles could be seriously harmed.

Our vehicles may contain defects in design and manufacturing that may cause fluctuationsthem not to perform as expected or that may require repair. The discovery of defects in our financial results.

vehicles would result in delays in new model launches, recall campaigns, reputational damage, or increased warranty costs that may negatively affect our business. Moreover, if one of our vehicles is a cause, or perceived to be the cause, of injury or death to an operator, passenger or bystander, we would likely be subject to a claim. If we were found responsible, we could incur substantial liability which could interrupt or even cause us to terminate some or all of our operations.

Meeting or exceeding many government-mandated safety standards is costly and often technologically challenging. Government safety standards also require manufacturers to remedy defects related to vehicle safety through safety recall campaigns, and a manufacturer is obligated to recall vehicles if it determines that the vehicles do not comply with a safety standard. The costs of recall campaigns or warranty costs to remedy such defects in vehicles that have been sold could be substantial. Further, adverse publicity surrounding actual or alleged safety-related or other defects could damage our reputation and confidence in our vehicles, which would adversely affect sales of our vehicles.

We depend on key personnel to operate our business, and the loss of one or more members of our management team, or our failure to attract, integrate and retain other highly qualified personnel in the future, could harm our business.

We believe our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract and retain highly skilled managerial, technical, finance and sales and marketing personnel. We currently depend onhave only one line of business and are highly dependent upon the continued servicesservice of our key executive officers and performanceother employees. The loss of and failure to replace key management and personnel could have a serious adverse effect on sales bookings, strategic relationships, manufacturing operations, order fulfilment and customer service, and may adversely impact the keyachievement of our objectives. Despite our efforts to retain valuable employees, members of our management team,may terminate their employment with us at any time. Although we have written employment agreements with our executive officers, these employment agreements do not bind these executives for any specific term and allow executive officers to leave at any time, for any reason, with or without cause. We do not maintain any “key-man” insurance policies on any of the key employees nor do we intend to obtain such insurance.

Recruiting and retaining qualified employees, consultants, and advisors for our business, including Spencer Richardson,sales or technical personnel, is crucial to continue to execute our Co-Foundergrowth strategy. Because the pool of qualified personnel with engineering or manufacturing experience and/or experience working in the electric vehicle market is limited overall, recruitment and Chief Executive Officer,retention of senior management and David Newman, our Co-Founderskilled technical, sales and Chief Business Development Officer. The lossother personnel is very competitive. Many of anythe companies with which we compete for experienced personnel have greater resources than us. We are also at a disadvantage in recruiting and retaining key personnel, as our small size and limited resources may be viewed as providing a less stable environment with fewer opportunities than would be offered at one of our larger competitors. As a result, we may not be successful in either attracting or retaining such personnel and/or on acceptable terms given the competition and may be required to increase the level of compensation paid to existing and new employees, which could disruptmaterially increase our operating expenses. In addition, failure to succeed in expansion of our operations may make it more challenging to recruit and retain qualified personnel.

Our management has minimal experience in mass-producing electric vehicles.

Our management has never mass-produced electric vehicles, which generally involves manufacturing process challenges, such as manufacturing to meet the volumes forecasted and efficiently and effectively managing supply chain sources for materials. If the materials suppliers are not managed properly to support vehicle demand, our results of operations and working capital can be adversely affected. If we are unable to implement our business plans in the timeframe estimated by management and successfully transition into a mass-producing electric vehicle manufacturing business, we will not be able to scale up our operations to generate greater profit. As a result, our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition will be negatively impacted and our ability to grow our business will be harmed.

Furthermore, as the scale of our vehicle production increases, we will need to accurately forecast, purchase, warehouse and transport to our manufacturing facilities components at much higher volumes than we have andone in the past. If we are unable to accurately match the timing and quantities of component purchases to our actual production plans or capabilities, or successfully implement automation, inventory management and other systems to accommodate the increased complexity in our supply chain, we may have to incur unexpected storage, transportation and write-off costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our abilityfinancial condition and operating results.

We currently have limited electric vehicles marketing and sales experience. If we are unable to growestablish sales and marketing capabilities or enter into dealer agreements to market and sell our vehicles, we may be unable to generate any revenue.

We have limited experience selling and marketing our vehicles, and we currently have minimal marketing or sales organization. To successfully expand our operations, we will need to invest in and develop these capabilities, either on our own or with others, which would be expensive, difficult and time consuming. Any failure or delay in the business.

Prior to the second quarter in 2018, we relied on outside consultants and other service providers for the majoritytimely development of our accountinginternal sales and financial support. During 2018,marketing capabilities could adversely impact the potential for success of our products.

Further, given our lack of prior experience in marketing and selling electric vehicles, we hired new membersrely on third-party dealers to market our management team. In February of 2019,vehicles. If these dealers do not commit sufficient resources to market our vehicles and we terminatedare unable to develop the necessary marketing and sales capabilities on our Chief Financial Officer and, on the same day, engagedown, including developing a consultant to serve asdirect sales channel with our Chief Financial Officer going forward. We compete in the market for personnel against numerous companies, including larger, more established competitors who have significantly greater financial resources and may be in a better financial position to offer higher compensation packages to attract and retain human capital. We cannot be certain thatend-customers, we will be successfulunable to generate sufficient revenue from the sale of our vehicles to sustain or grow our business. We may be competing with companies that currently have extensive and well-funded marketing and sales operations, particularly in attractingthe markets we are targeting. Without appropriate capabilities, whether directly or through third-party dealerships, we may be unable to compete successfully against these more established companies.

Failure to maintain the strength and retaining the skilled personnel necessary to operatevalue of our brand could have a material adverse effect on our business, effectivelyfinancial condition and results of operations.

Our success depends, in part, on the future.

Wevalue and strength of our brand. Maintaining, enhancing, promoting and positioning our brand, particularly in new markets where we have limited brand recognition, will depend largely on the success of our marketing and merchandising efforts and our ability to provide high-quality services, warranty plans, products and resources and a consistent, high-quality customer experience. Our brand could be adversely affected if we fail to achieve these objectives, if we fail to comply with laws and regulations, if we are subject to publicized litigation or if our public image or reputation were to be tarnished by negative publicity. Some of these risks may become engagedbe beyond our ability to control, such as the effects of negative publicity regarding our suppliers or third-party providers of services or other electric transportation companies or their products or negative publicity related to members of management. Any of these events could hurt our image, resulting in legal proceedings thatreduced demand for our products and a decrease in sales. Further, maintaining, enhancing, promoting and positioning our brands’ images may require us to make substantial investments in marketing and employee training, which could adversely affect our cash flow, and which may ultimately be unsuccessful. These factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The range of our electric vehicles on a single charge declines over time which may negatively influence potential customers’ decisions on whether to purchase our vehicles.

The range of our electric vehicles on a single charge declines principally as a function of usage, time and charging patterns. For example, a customer’s use of their vehicle, as well as the frequency with which they charge the battery of their vehicle, can result in unforeseen expensesadditional deterioration of the battery’s ability to hold a charge. Additionally, over time, a battery’s ability to hold its initial charge will degrade. While expected in electric vehicle applications, such battery deterioration and could occupythe related decrease in range may negatively influence potential customer decisions as to whether to purchase our vehicles, which may harm our ability to market and sell our vehicles.

We offer a significant amountproduct warranty to cover defective products at no cost to the customer. An unexpected change in failure rates of management’s time and attention.

From time to time, we may become subject to litigation, claims or other proceedings that could negatively affect our business operations and financial position. Litigation disputes could cause us to incur unforeseen expenses, could occupy a significant amount of management’s time and attention and could negatively affect our business operations and financial position.

Our business is subject to interruptions, delays and failures resulting from natural or man-made disasters.
Our services, systems and operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes, volcanoes, fires, floods, power losses, telecommunications failures, terrorist attacks, acts of war, human errors, break-ins and similar events. A significant natural disasterproducts could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and operating resultsresults.

We offer product warranties that generally extend for two years from date of sale that require us to repair or replace defective products returned by the customer during the warranty period at no cost to the customer. While defects in the individual parts for our vehicles are currently reimbursed by our supply chain, warranty labor is our responsibility. We record an estimate for anticipated warranty-related costs at the time of sale based on historical and financial condition. estimated future product return rates and expected repair or replacement costs. While such costs and failure rates have historically been within management’s expectations and the provisions established and we receive warranty coverage from our vendors, unexpected changes in failure rates could have a material adverse impact on our business requiring additional warranty reserves. These failures could adversely impact our operating results.

Increases in costs, disruption of supply or shortage of raw materials, particularly lithium-ion cells, could harm our business.

We may not have sufficient protectionexperience increases in the cost or recovery plansa sustained interruption in certain circumstancesthe supply or shortage of raw materials. Any such increase or supply interruption could materially negatively impact our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results. We use various raw materials in our insurance coverage may be insufficient to compensatebusiness, including aluminum, steel, carbon fiber, non-ferrous metals such as copper and cobalt. The prices for losses that may occur. As we rely heavilythese raw materials fluctuate depending on our servers, computermarket conditions and communications systemsglobal demand for these materials and the internet to conductcould adversely affect our business and provideoperating results. For instance, we are exposed to multiple risks relating to price fluctuations for lithium-ion cells. These risks include:

the inability or unwillingness of current battery manufacturers to build or operate battery cell manufacturing plants to supply the numbers of lithium-ion cells required to support the growth of the electric or plug-in hybrid vehicle industry as demand for such cells increases;
disruption in the supply of cells due to quality issues or recalls by the battery cell manufacturers; and
an increase in the cost of raw materials, such as cobalt, used in lithium-ion cells.

Our business depends on the continued supply of battery cells for our vehicles. Any disruption in the supply of battery cells from our suppliers or industry shortage or price escalations could temporarily disrupt the planned production of our vehicles until such time as a high-quality clientdifferent supplier is fully qualified. Moreover, battery cell manufacturers may choose to refuse to supply electric vehicle manufacturers to the extent they determine that the vehicles are not sufficiently safe. Furthermore, current fluctuations or shortages in petroleum, shipping seasonality and government-imposed tariffs and other economic conditions may cause us to experience significant increases in freight charges and raw material costs. Substantial increases in the prices for our raw materials would increase our operating costs and could reduce our margins if we cannot recoup the increased costs through increased electric vehicle prices. We might not be able to recoup increasing costs of raw materials by increasing vehicle prices which could materially adversely affect our business, prospects and operating results.

Our business may be adversely affected by labor and union activities.

Although none of our employees are currently represented by a labor union, it is common throughout the automobile industry generally for many employees at automobile companies to belong to a union, which can result in higher employee costs and increased risk of work stoppages. We rely on other companies in the supply chain with work forces that may or may not be unionized and are thus subject to work stoppages or strikes organized by such disruptions could negatively impact our ability to run the business,unions, which could have ana material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or operating results. If a work stoppage occurs within our business, or within that of our key suppliers’ businesses, it could delay the manufacturing, sale and shipment of our electric vehicles and have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, operating results.

results or financial condition.

We rely on our dealers for the service of our vehicles and have limited experience servicing our vehicles. If we are unable to address the service requirements of our future customers, our business will be materially and adversely affected.

Currently, our vehicles are serviced by the selling dealer. If the dealer is unable to successfully address the service requirements of our customers, customer confidence in both the vehicles and our brand will erode and our prospects and operating results will be materially and adversely affected. In addition, we anticipate the level and quality of service the dealers will provide to our customers will have a direct impact on the success of our future vehicles. If our dealers are unable to satisfactorily service our customers, our ability to generate customer loyalty, grow our business and sell additional vehicles could be significantly impaired.

Our dealers have very limited experience servicing our vehicles. Servicing electric vehicles is different than servicing vehicles with internal combustion engines and requires specialized skills, including high voltage training and servicing techniques.

If we fail to deliver vehicles and accessories to market as scheduled, our business will be harmed.

A significant amount of our revenue is seasonal. By missing product delivery schedules, we may miss that year’s opportunity to bring and sell a new product to market. Seasonality could be affected by many factors including, but not limited to, governmental fiscal years, as municipalities tend to order vehicles either at the end of their fiscal year when they know they have funds remaining, and summer tourist season for our destination fleet operators, as such customers tend to place their entire orders for delivery in time for the beginning of the tourist season.

Our success depends, in part, on establishing and maintaining good relationships with our network of dealers.

In the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we derived 68% and 75% of our vehicle revenue from Club Car under our MPA, for distribution through Club Car dealers. Our success depends, in part, on us establishing and maintaining satisfactory relationships with both the Club Car corporate organization as well as its distribution channels or its dealers. If we were unable to establish and maintain an adequate relationship with Club Car and its dealer network or, once established, if our relationship with Club Car or its dealer network were to be eliminated abruptly or disrupted, it could affect our ability to respond quickly to customers’ needs, resulting in various adverse consequences to us, including loss of sales, reduced cash flow, and/or a shutdown of our operations. In addition, as authorized dealers of our vehicles, the dealers could, through poor performance on such dealer’s part, damage our and our vehicles’ reputation in the marketplace, resulting in a loss of sales and cash flow which could adversely affect our business operations.

Customer financing and insuring our vehicles may prove difficult because retail lenders are unfamiliar with our vehicles and our vehicles have a limited loss history determining residual values and within the insurance industry.

Retail lenders are unfamiliar with our vehicles and may be hesitant to provide financing to our customers. Our vehicles do not have a loss history in the insurance industry, which may cause our customers difficulty in securing insurance coverage.

Failure in our information technology and storage systems could significantly disrupt the operation of our business.

Our ability to execute our business plan and maintain operations depends on the continued and uninterrupted performance of our information technology (“IT”) systems. We must routinely update our IT infrastructure and our various IT systems throughout the organization, or we may not continue to meet our current and future business needs. Modification, upgrade or replacement of such systems may be costly. Furthermore, IT systems are vulnerable to risks and damages from a variety of sources, including telecommunications or network failures, malicious human acts and natural disasters. Moreover, despite network security and back-up measures, some of our and our vendors’ servers are potentially vulnerable to physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses and similar disruptive problems. Despite precautionary measures to prevent unanticipated problems that could affect our IT systems, sustained or repeated system failures that interrupt our ability to generate and maintain data could adversely affect our ability to operate our business.

Risks Relating to Our Financial Position and Need for Additional Capital

We may be required to raise additional capital to fund our operations, and such capital raising may be costly or difficult to obtain and could dilute our stockholders’ ownership interests.

The design, manufacture, sale and servicing of vehicles is a capital-intensive business, and we may need to raise additional funds to expand our operations and reach vehicle production goals. At December 31, 2020, we had working capital of approximately $38.5 million, and we received subsequent to December 31, 2020 aggregate net proceeds of approximately $56.8 million registered direct offerings that closed in January 2021 and February 2021. Based upon our current expectations, we believe that our existing capital resources, including the proceeds from our registered direct offerings that closed in January 2021 and February 2021, will enable us to continue planned operations through at least March 31, 2022. However, we cannot assure you that our plans will not change or that changed circumstances will not result in the depletion of our capital resources more rapidly than we currently anticipate. If our cash on hand, the funds from the January 2021 and February 2021 registered direct offerings and our sales revenue are not sufficient to cover our cash requirements, we will need to raise additional capital, whether through the sale of equity or debt securities, the entry into strategic business collaborations, the establishment of other funding facilities, licensing arrangements, or asset sales or other means, in order to support our business plan. In addition, we may need to raise additional capital for strategic acquisitions or transactions. Such additional capital we may need may not be available on reasonable terms or at all.

Our ability to obtain the necessary financing to carry out our business plan is subject to a number of factors, including general market conditions, performance of our vehicles, market demand for our vehicles and investor acceptance of our business plan. These factors may make the timing, amount, terms and conditions of such financing unattractive or unavailable to us. If we are unable to obtain additional financing on a timely basis, we may have to curtail, delay or eliminate our development activities and growth plans, and/or be forced to sell some or all assets, perhaps on unfavorable terms, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, and ultimately we could be forced to discontinue our operations and liquidate, in which event it is unlikely that stockholders would receive any distribution on their shares. Further, we may not be able to continue operating if we do not generate sufficient revenues from operations needed to stay in business.

We have incurredraised capital in the past primarily through public offerings, as well as debt and private placements of our convertible preferred stock. We may in the future pursue the sale of additional equity and/or debt securities, or the establishment of other funding facilities including asset-based borrowings. There can be no assurances, however, that we will be able to raise additional capital through such an offering on acceptable terms, or at all. Issuances of additional debt or equity securities could impact the rights of the holders of our common stock and may dilute their ownership percentage. The terms of any securities issued by us in future capital transactions may be more favorable to new investors, and may include preferences, superior voting rights and the issuance of warrants or other derivative securities, which may have a further dilutive effect on the holders of any of our securities then outstanding.

The terms of debt securities we may have to issue or future borrowings we may have to incur to fund our operations could impose significant restrictions on our operations. The incurrence of indebtedness or the issuance of certain equity securities could result in increased fixed payment obligations and could also result in restrictive covenants, such as limitations on our ability to incur additional debt or issue additional equity, limitations on our ability to acquire or license intellectual property rights, and other operating restrictions that could adversely affect our ability to conduct our business.

If we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements with third parties, it may be necessary to relinquish some rights to our technologies or our products, to grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us, or to issue equity instruments that may be dilutive to our stockholders.

In addition, we may incur substantial costs in pursuing future capital financing, including investment banking fees, legal fees, accounting fees, securities law compliance fees, printing and distribution expenses and other costs. We may also be required to recognize non-cash expenses in connection with certain securities we issue, such as convertible notes and warrants, which may adversely impact our financial condition.

Our long-term capital requirements are subject to numerous risks.

Our long-term capital requirements are expected to depend on many potential factors, including, among others:

the number of vehicles being manufactured and future models in development;
the regulatory compliance and clarity of each of our vehicles;
the progress, success and cost of our development programs, including manufacturing;
the costs of manufacturing, developing sales, marketing and distribution channels;
the costs of enforcing our issued patents and defending intellectual property-related claims;
our ability to successfully grow sales, including securing strategic partner and distribution agreements and favorable pricing and market share; and
our consumption of available resources more rapidly than currently anticipated, resulting in the need for additional funding sooner than anticipated.

We may invest in or acquire other businesses, and our business may suffer if we are unable to successfully integrate acquired businesses into our company or otherwise manage the growth associated with multiple acquisitions.

As part of our business strategy, we may make acquisitions as opportunities arise to add new or complementary businesses, products, brands or technologies. In some cases, the costs of such acquisitions may be substantial, including as a result of professional fees and due diligence efforts. There is no assurance that the time and resources expended on pursuing a particular acquisition will result in a completed transaction, or that any completed transaction will ultimately be successful. In addition, we may be unable to identify suitable acquisition or strategic investment opportunities or may be unable to obtain any required financing or regulatory approvals, and therefore may be unable to complete such acquisitions or strategic investments on favorable terms, if at all. We may decide to pursue acquisitions with which our investors may not agree and we cannot assure investors that any acquisition or investment will be successful or otherwise provide a favorable return on investment. In addition, acquisitions and the integration thereof require significant time and resources and place significant demands on our management, as well as on our operational and financial infrastructure. In addition, if we fail to successfully close transactions or integrate new teams, or integrate the products and technologies associated with these acquisitions into our company, our business could be seriously harmed. Acquisitions may expose us to operational challenges and risks, including:

the ability to profitably manage acquired businesses or successfully integrate the acquired businesses’ operations, personnel, financial reporting, accounting and internal controls, technologies and products into our business;
increased indebtedness and the expense of integrating acquired businesses, including significant administrative, operational, economic, geographic or cultural challenges in managing and integrating the expanded or combined operations;
entry into jurisdictions or acquisition of products or technologies with which we have limited or no prior experience, and the potential of increased competition with new or existing competitors as a result of such acquisitions;
diversion of management’s attention and the over-extension of our operating infrastructure and our management systems, information technology systems, and internal controls and procedures, which may be inadequate to support growth;
the ability to fund our capital needs and any cash flow shortages that may occur if anticipated revenue is not realized or is delayed, whether by general economic or market conditions, or unforeseen internal difficulties; and
the ability to retain or hire qualified personnel required for expanded operations.

Our acquisition strategy may not succeed if we are unable to remain attractive to target companies or expeditiously close transactions. Issuing shares of our common stock to fund an acquisition would cause economic dilution to existing stockholders. If we develop a reputation for being a difficult acquirer or having an unfavorable work environment, or target companies view our common stock unfavorably, we may be unable to consummate key acquisition transactions essential to our corporate strategy and our business may be seriously harmed.

Risks Related to Regulatory Matters

Increased safety, emissions, fuel economy, or other regulations may result in higher costs, cash expenditures, and/or sales restrictions.

The motorized vehicle industry is governed by a substantial amount of government regulation, which often differs by state and region. Government regulation has arisen, and proposals for additional regulation are advanced, primarily out of concern for the environment, vehicle safety, and energy independence. In addition, many governments regulate local product content and/or impose import requirements as a publicmeans of creating jobs, protecting domestic producers, and influencing the balance of payments. The cost to comply with existing government regulations is substantial, and future, additional regulations could have a substantial adverse impact on our financial condition.

Our vehicles are subject to multi-jurisdictional motor vehicle standards.

All vehicles sold must comply with federal, state and country-specific motor vehicle safety standards. Rigorous testing and the use of approved materials and equipment are among the requirements for achieving federal certification. Failure of the AYRO 411 Fleet or future vehicle models to satisfy motor vehicle standards would have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

Changes in regulations could render our vehicles incompatible with federal, state or local regulations, or use cases.

Many governmental standards and regulations relating to safety, fuel economy, emissions control, noise control, vehicle recycling, substances of concern, vehicle damage, and theft prevention are applicable to new motor vehicles, engines, and equipment manufactured for sale in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere, including our electric vehicles. In addition, manufacturing and other automotive assembly facilities in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere are subject to stringent standards regulating air emissions, water discharges, and the handling and disposal of hazardous substances. Therefore, any unanticipated changes in regulations applicable to our electric vehicles could render our vehicles incompatible, which may prevent us from selling such vehicles and, as a result, we could lose market share.

If we fail to comply with environmental and safety laws and regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incur costs that could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.

We are subject to numerous environmental and health and safety laws, including statutes, regulations, bylaws and other legal requirements. These laws relate to the generation, use, handling, storage, transportation and disposal of regulated substances, including hazardous substances (such as batteries), dangerous goods and waste, emissions or discharges into soil, water and air, including noise and odors (which could result in remediation obligations), and occupational health and safety matters, including indoor air quality. These legal requirements vary by location and can arise under federal, provincial, state or municipal laws. Any breach of such laws and/or requirements would have a material adverse effect on our company and our operating results.

Unusual or significant litigation, governmental investigations or adverse publicity arising out of alleged defects in our vehicles, or otherwise, may derail our business.

Although we plan to comply with governmental safety regulations, mobile and stationary source emissions regulations, and other standards, compliance with governmental standards does not necessarily prevent individual or class action lawsuits, which can entail significant cost and risk. In certain circumstances, courts may permit tort claims even when our vehicles comply with federal law and/or other applicable law. Furthermore, simply responding to actual or threatened litigation or government investigations of our compliance with regulatory standards, whether related to our vehicles, business or commercial relationships, may require significant expenditures of time and other resources. Litigation also is inherently uncertain, and we could experience significant adverse results if litigation is ever brought against us. In addition, adverse publicity surrounding an allegation of a defect, regulatory violation or other matter (with or without corresponding litigation or governmental investigation) may cause significant reputational harm that could have a significant adverse effect on our sales.

In order for us to sell directly to end customers, we are required to comply with state-specific regulations regarding the sale of vehicles by a manufacturer.

We sold approximately 7% of our vehicles directly to our end customers in the year ended December 31, 2020. Going forward, we intend to focus on leveraging volume sales through dealers; however, we will continue to sell vehicles directly to end customers. Sales to both dealers and end customers require us to comply with state-specific regulations regarding the sale of vehicles by a manufacturer, including licensing and registration requirements. State laws that regulate the distribution and sale of motor vehicles by the manufacturer vary, and ensuring compliance is time-consuming and costly. Moreover, for customers living in states where we are prohibited from selling directly from within the state, we will have to consummate sales at facilities in a state that allows direct manufacturer-to-consumer sales and deliver the vehicle to the end user via a common carrier. As such, we may be required to either acquire and maintain a facility in multiple states, or incur additional costs of delivery of the vehicle, which consequently increases the cost and/or sales price of our vehicles and makes our vehicles less desirable to end-customers.

We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. If we are unable to remediate the material weakness, or if we experience additional material weaknesses in the future, our business may be harmed.

Our management is requiredresponsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for evaluating and reporting on the effectiveness of our system of internal control. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to devote substantial time to public company compliance requirements.

provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (“GAAP”). As a public company, we face increased legal, accounting, administrativeare required to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other costsrules that govern public companies. In particular, we are required to certify our compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires us to furnish annually a report by management on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

Our management performed an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020 and expenses thatconcluded our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2020 due to the material weakness related to segregation of duties. Specifically, due to limited resources and headcount we did not incurhave multiple people in the accounting function for a full segregation of duties. We have taken and continue to take remedial steps to improve our internal control over financial reporting by hiring additional personnel with added expertise in public company reporting and expect to conclude that the material weakness has been remediated as these individuals progress through the onboarding process.

Remediation efforts place a private company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Actsignificant burden on management and add increased pressure to our financial resources and processes. If we are unable to successfully remediate our existing material weakness or any additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that may be identified in the future in a timely manner, the accuracy and timing of 2002, includingour financial reporting may be adversely affected; our liquidity, our access to capital markets, the perceptions of our creditworthiness may be adversely affected; we may be unable to maintain or regain compliance with applicable securities laws, the listing requirements of Section 404,the Nasdaq Stock Market; we may be subject to regulatory investigations and rulespenalties; investors may lose confidence in our financial reporting; our reputation may be harmed; and regulations subsequently implemented by the SEC, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board,our stock price may decline.

Our failure to timely and The Nasdaq Capital Market require public companies to meet certain corporate governance standards. A number of those requirements necessitate our management to carry out activities we have not done previously. For example, we have adopted new internaleffectively implement controls and disclosure controls and procedures. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these requirements. Moreover, these rules and regulations have increased our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costlier. These increased costs will require us to divert a significant amount of money that we could otherwise use to expand our business and achieve our strategic objectives.

Failure to establish and maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Sections 302 and 404procedures required by Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have ana material adverse effect on our business and stock price.
Webusiness.

As a public company, we are required to comply with the SEC’s rules implementing Sections 302 and 404provide management’s attestation on internal controls. The standards required for a public company under Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act which require managementare significantly more stringent than those that were required of us as a private company. We continue to certify financialimplement additional finance, accounting, and other information inbusiness operating systems, procedures, and controls as we grow our quarterlybusiness and annual reportsorganization and provide an annual management report onto satisfy existing reporting requirements. If we fail to maintain or implement adequate controls, if we are unable to complete the effectiveness of controls over financial reporting. We are required Section 404 assessment as to disclose changes made in our internal controls and procedures on a quarterly basis. We are required to make our annual assessmentthe adequacy of our internal controlscontrol over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 as of December 31, 2019.

To comply with the requirements of Sections 302 and 404, we have undertakenin future Form 10-K filings, or may in the future undertake various actions, such as implementing new internal controls and procedures and hiring additional accounting or internal audit staff. Testing and maintaining internal controls can divert our management’s attention from other matters that are important to the operation of our business. In addition, when evaluating our internal controls over financial reporting, we may identify material weaknesses that we may not be able to remediate in time to meet the applicable deadline imposed upon us for compliance with the requirements of Sections 302 and 404. If we identify material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting or are unable to comply with the requirements of Sections 302 and 404 in a timely manner or assert that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective, or if it becomes necessary for our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to expressprovide us with an opinionunqualified report as to the effectiveness of our internal controlscontrol over financial reporting and is unable to do so, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports andfuture Form 10-K filings, the market price of our common stock could be negatively affected. In addition,decline and we could becomebe subject to sanctions or investigations by Thethe SEC, the Nasdaq Capital Market, SEC or other regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial and management resources.
A

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

If we are unable to adequately protect our proprietary designs and intellectual property rights, our competitive position could be harmed.

Our ability to compete effectively is dependent in part upon our ability to obtain patent protection for our designs, products, methods, processes and other technologies, to preserve our trade secrets, to prevent third parties from infringing on our proprietary rights and to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties. We rely on design patents, trademarks, trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures and licensing arrangements to protect our intellectual property rights. There can be no assurance these protections will be available in all cases or will be adequate to prevent our competitors from copying, reverse engineering or otherwise obtaining and using our designs, technology, proprietary rights or products. For example, the laws of certain countries in which our products, components and sub-assemblies are manufactured or licensed do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States.

To prevent substantial unauthorized use of our intellectual property rights, it may be necessary to prosecute actions for infringement and/or misappropriation of our trade secrets and/or proprietary rights against third parties. Any such action could result in significant costs and diversion of our resources and management’s attention, and there can be no assurance we will be successful in such action. Furthermore, our current and potential competitors may have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to enforce their intellectual property rights than we do. Accordingly, despite our efforts, we may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating our trade secrets and/or intellectual property.

In addition, third parties may seek to challenge, invalidate or circumvent our patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets, or applications for any of the foregoing. There can be no assurance that our competitors or customers will not independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technology or design around our proprietary rights. In each case, our ability to compete could be significantly impaired.

We are dependent on the manufacturing license we have obtained from Cenntro and may need to obtain rights to other intellectual property in the future. If we fail to obtain licenses we need or fail to comply with our obligations in the agreement under which we licensed intellectual property and other rights from third parties, we could lose our ability to manufacture our vehicles.

Cenntro owns the design of the AYRO 411 model and has granted us an exclusive license to manufacture AYRO 411 model for sale in North America. Our business is dependent on such license, and if we fail to comply with our obligations to maintain that license, our business will be substantially harmed. Under the Manufacturing License Agreement, dated April 27, 2017 and further modified on March 22, 2020, between Cenntro and us, we are granted an exclusive license to manufacture and sell AYRO 411 in the United States, and we are required to purchase the minimum volume of product units from Cenntro, among other obligations. No assurance can be given that we will be able to meet the required quota and maintain our license granted by Cenntro and that our existing license will be extended on reasonable terms or at all. In addition, we may need to license intellectual property from other third parties in the future for new vehicle models. No assurance can be given that we will be able to obtain such license or meet our obligations to maintain the licenses we may have to obtain from third parties in the future. If we were to lose or otherwise be unable to maintain these licenses for any reason, it would halt our ability to manufacture and sell our vehicles or may prohibit development of our future models. Any of the foregoing could result in a material weaknessadverse effect on our business or results of operations.

In addition, if we do not own the patents or patent applications that we license, as is the case with AYRO 411’s patents, we may need to rely upon our licensors to properly prosecute and maintain those patent applications and prevent infringement of those patents. If our licensors are unable to adequately protect their proprietary intellectual property we license from legal challenges, or if we are unable to enforce such licensed intellectual property against infringement or alternative technologies, we will not be able to compete effectively in the electric vehicle markets we are targeting.

Many of our proprietary designs are in digital form and a breach of our computer systems could result in these designs being stolen.

If our security measures are breached or unauthorized access to private or proprietary data is otherwise obtained, our proprietary designs could be stolen. Because we hold many of these designs in digital form on our servers, there exists an inherent risk that an unauthorized third party could conduct a security breach resulting in the theft of our proprietary information. While we have taken steps to protect our proprietary information, because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not identified until they are launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Any or all of these issues could negatively impact our competitive advantage and our ability to obtain new customers, thereby adversely affecting our financial results.

Our proprietary designs are susceptible to reverse engineering by our competitors.

Much of the value of our proprietary rights is derived from our vast library of design specifications. While we consider our design specifications to be protected by various proprietary, trade secret and intellectual property laws, such information is susceptible to reverse engineering by our competitors. We may not be able to prevent our competitors from developing competing design specifications, and the cost of enforcing these rights may be significant. If we are unable to adequately protect our proprietary designs, our financial condition and operating results could suffer.

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets or know-how, such proprietary information may be used by others to compete against us.

We consider trade secrets, including confidential and unpatented know-how and designs important to the maintenance of our competitive position. We protect trade secrets and confidential and unpatented know-how, in part, by customarily entering into non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with parties who have access to such knowledge, such as our employees, outside technical and commercial collaborators, consultants, advisors and other third parties. We also enter into confidentiality and invention or patent assignment agreements with our employees and consultants that obligate them to maintain confidentiality and assign their inventions to us. Despite these efforts, any of these parties may breach the agreements and disclose our proprietary information, including our trade secrets, and we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for such breaches.

Legal proceedings or third-party claims of intellectual property infringement and other challenges may require us to spend substantial time and money and could harm our business.

The vehicle design and manufacturing industry is characterized by vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual property rights, which has resulted in protracted and expensive litigation for many companies. We may become subject to lawsuits alleging that we have infringed the intellectual property rights of others. The nature of claims contained in unpublished patent filings around the world is unknown to us, and it is not possible to know which countries patent holders may choose for the extension of their filings under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, or other mechanisms. To the extent that we have previously incorporated third-party technology and/or know-how into certain products for which we do not have sufficient license rights, we could incur substantial litigation costs, be forced to pay substantial damages or royalties, or even be forced to cease sales in the event any owner of such technology or know-how were to challenge our subsequent sale of such products (and any progeny thereof). In addition, to the extent that we discover or have discovered third-party patents that may be applicable to products or processes in development, we may need to take steps to avoid claims of possible infringement, including obtaining non-infringement or invalidity opinions and, when necessary, re-designing or re-engineering products. However, we cannot assure you that these precautions will allow us to successfully avoid infringement claims. We may also be subject to claims based on the actions of employees and consultants with respect to the usage or disclosure of intellectual property learned from other employers. Third parties may in the future assert claims of infringement of intellectual property rights against us or against our customers or channel partners for which we may be liable.

Our involvement in intellectual property litigation could result in significant expense to us, adversely affect the development of sales of the challenged product or intellectual property and divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel, whether or not such litigation is resolved in our internal controlsfavor. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation or defense of intellectual property litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on us.

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reasonable assurance with respect to our financial reports and to adequately mitigate risk of fraud. If we cannot provide reasonable assurance with respect to our financial reports and adequately mitigate risk of fraud, our reputation and operating results could be harmed. Internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud. Therefore, even effective internal controls can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. A material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting could adversely impact our ability to provide timely and accurate financial information. Ifcompete in the marketplace. In the event of an adverse outcome in any such litigation, we are unable to report financial information timely and accurately or to maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures, we could be subject to,may, among other things, regulatory or enforcement actions by the SEC, any one of which could adversely affect our business prospects.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective due to the material weaknesses resulting from a limited segregation of duties among our employees with respect to our control activities and this deficiency is the result of our limited number of employees. We also identified material weaknesses surrounding the financial closing process and the recording of debt and equity transactions that occurred in the year ended December 31, 2019. These deficiencies may affect our management’s ability to determine if errors or inappropriate actions have taken place.
Provisions of our charter documents or Delaware law could delay or prevent an acquisition of the company, even if the acquisition would be beneficial to our stockholders, and could make it more difficult for you to change management.
Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control that our stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which our stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares. In addition, these provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempt by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult to replace or remove our Board of Directors. These provisions include:
required to:

 the exclusive right of our Board of Directors to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of our Board of Directors or the resignation, death or removal of a director;
a requirement that special meetings of our stockholders be called only by the chairman of our Board of Directors, our Board of Directors or a committee of our Board of Directors to whom such authority has been delegated;
an advance notice requirement for stockholder proposals and nominations;
the authority of our Board of Directors to issue preferred stock with such terms as our Board of Directors may determine; andpay substantial damages;
   
 a requirementcease the development, manufacture, use, sale or importation of approval of not less than 66 2/3% of all outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote to amend any bylaws by stockholder action.
In addition, our amended and restated bylaws, to the fullest extent permitted by law, provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the exclusive forum for: any derivative action or proceeding brought on Our behalf; any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty; any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, or our amended and restated bylaws; or any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. This exclusive forum provision does not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). It could apply, however, to a suit that falls within one or more of the categories enumerated in the exclusive forum provision and asserts claims under the Securities Act, inasmuch as Section 22 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rule and regulations thereunder. There is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such provision with respect to claims under the Securities Act, and our stockholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.


This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provisions contained in our bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Provisions in our charter and other provisions of Delaware law could limit the price that investors are willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.
Risks Relating to Our Financial Position and Need for Additional Capital
Our ability to use NOLs may be limited.
At December 31, 2019, we had approximately $17.0 million of operating loss carryforwards for federal and approximately $17.0 million for New York state tax purposes that may be applied against future taxable income. The NOLs will begin to expire in the year 2037 if not utilized prior to that date. To the extent available, we intend to use these NOLs to reduce the corporate income tax liability associated with our operations. The ability to utilize these NOLs may be limited under Section 382 of the Code, which apply if an ownership change occurs. It is expected that the AYRO Merger will impose a limitation on the utilization of our NOLs under Section 382 of the Code. To the extent our use of NOLs is significantly limited, our income could be subject to corporate income tax earlier than it would if we were able to use NOLs, which could have a negative effect on our financial results.
The Tax Cut and Jobs Act could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” or TCJA, which significantly reforms the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. The TCJA, among other things, includes changes to U.S. federal tax rates, imposes significant additional limitations on the deductibility of interest and NOLs, allows for the expensing of capital expenditures, and puts into effect the migration from a “worldwide” system of taxation to a territorial system. Our net deferred tax assets and liabilities were revalued at the newly enacted U.S. corporate rate, and the estimated impact was recognized in our tax expense in 2017. We continue to examine the impact this tax reform legislation may have on our business. However, the effect of the TCJA on our business, whether adverse or favorable, is uncertain, and may not become evident for some period of time. We urge investors to consult with their legal and tax advisers regarding the implications of the TCJA on an investment in our common stock. 
Our principal stockholders and management own a significant percentage of our common stock and are able to exert significant control over matters subject to stockholder approval.
Based on the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 25, 2020, our officers and directors, together with holders of 5% or more of our common stock outstanding and our respective affiliates, beneficially own approximately 35% of our common stock, which reflects 9.99% beneficial ownership limitations included in certain company instruments. Accordingly, these stockholders have significant influence over the outcome of corporate actions requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets or any other significant corporate transaction. The interests of these stockholders may not be the same as or may even conflict with your interests. For example, these stockholders could delay or prevent a change of control of the company, even if such a change of control would benefit the other stockholders, which could deprive such other stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as part of a sale of the company or company assets and might affect the prevailing market price of our common stock. The significant concentration of stock ownership may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock due to investors’ perception that conflicts of interest may exist or arise.

The price of our common stock may be volatile and fluctuate substantially, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price you paid for them.
The trading price of our common stock is highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control, such as reports by industry analysts, investor perceptions or negative announcements by other companies involving similar technologies. The stock market in general and the market for smaller companies, like us in particular, have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. As a result of this volatility, our stockholders may not be able to sell their common stock at or above the price they paid for it. The following factors, in addition to other factors described in this “Risk Factors” section of our most recent filings with the SEC, may have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock:
issuances of new equity securities pursuant to a future offering, including issuances of preferred stock;products that infringe upon other patented intellectual property;
   
 the success of competitive products, servicesexpend significant resources to develop or technologies;acquire non-infringing intellectual property;
   
 regulatorydiscontinue processes incorporating infringing technology; or legal developments in the United States and other countries;
   
 
adverse actions taken by regulatory agencies with respectobtain licenses to the services we provide;
developmentsinfringing intellectual property, which licenses may not be available on acceptable terms, or disputes concerning patent applications, issued patents or other proprietary rights;
the recruitment or departure of key personnel;
actual or anticipated changes in estimates as to financial results, development timelines or recommendations by securities analysts;
variations in our financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us;
variations in the costs of the services we provide;
market conditions in the market segments in which we operate;at all.

We are generally obligated to indemnify our sales channel partners, customers, suppliers and contractors for certain expenses and liabilities resulting from intellectual property infringement claims regarding our products, which could force us to incur substantial costs.

We have agreed, and expect to continue to agree, to indemnify our sales channel partners and customers for certain intellectual property infringement claims regarding our products. As a result, in the case of infringement claims against these sales channel partners and end-customers, we could be required to indemnify them for losses resulting from such claims or to refund amounts they have paid to us. Our sales channel partners and other end-customers in the future may seek indemnification from us in connection with infringement claims brought.

41
 variations in quarterly and annual operating results;
announcements of our new products and/or services or our competitors;
the gain or loss of significant customers;
changes in analysts’ earnings estimates;
short selling shares of our common stock;
litigation;
changing the exchange or quotation system on which shares of our common stock are listed;
trading volume of our common stock;
sales of our common stock by the company, our executive officers and directors or our stockholders in the future;
changes in accounting principles; and
general economic and market conditions and overall fluctuations in the U.S. equity markets.

Risks Related to Our International Operations

In addition, broad marketExchange rate fluctuations may materially affect our results of operations and industry factors may negativelyfinancial condition.

We operate internationally and are exposed to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and other currencies, particularly the Chinese Renminbi. Our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar and, as a result, financial line items, if not in the U.S. dollar, are converted into U.S. dollars at applicable foreign exchange rates. As our business grows, we expect that at least some of our revenues and expenses will be denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Therefore, unfavorable developments in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other relevant currencies could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

We pay Cenntro in U.S. dollars; however, the marketper-unit price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance, and factors beyond our control may cause our stock price to decline rapidly and unexpectedly.


We the sub-assemblies we must pay Cenntro may be subjectaffected due to securities litigation, whichthe exchange rate fluctuations. The value of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other currencies may fluctuate and is expensiveaffected by, among other things, changes in political and could divert management attention.
Companies that have experienced volatilityeconomic conditions in China and by China’s foreign exchange policies. Historically, the exchange rate between the Renminbi and the U.S. dollar has fluctuated significantly, and it is difficult to predict how market price of their stock have frequently been the objects of securities class action litigation. Weforces or Chinese or U.S. government policy may be the target of this type of litigationimpact such exchange rate in the future. Class actionAs of December 31, 2020, the Renminbi was valued at 6.53 against the U.S. dollar.

Very limited hedging options are available in China to reduce our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. To date, we have not entered into any material hedging transactions in an effort to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. While we may decide to enter into hedging transactions in the future, the availability and derivative lawsuits could result in substantial costs to the companyeffectiveness of these hedges may be limited, and cause a diversion of our management’s attention and resources, which could materially harm our financial condition and results of operations.


Risks Related to Intellectual Property
Wewe may not be able to adequately protecthedge our exposure or at all.

Our international sales and operations subject us to additional risks that can adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

Our international operations subject us to a variety of risks and challenges, including: increased management, travel, infrastructure and legal compliance costs associated with having international operations; reliance on sales channel partners; increased financial accounting and reporting burdens and complexities; compliance with foreign laws and regulations; compliance with U.S. laws and regulations for foreign operations; and reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries and practical difficulties of enforcing rights abroad. Any of these risks could adversely affect our international operations, reduce our international sales or increase our operating costs, adversely affecting our business, operating results and financial condition and growth prospects.

We are subject to governmental export and import controls that could impair our ability to compete in international markets due to licensing requirements and subject us to liability if we are not in compliance with applicable laws.

Our products are subject to export control and import laws and regulations, including the U.S. Export Administration Regulations, U.S. Customs regulations and various economic and trade sanctions regulations administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Controls. Exports of our products must be made in compliance with these laws and regulations. If we violate these laws and regulations, we and certain of our employees could be subject to substantial civil or criminal penalties, including the possible loss of export or import privileges, fines, which may be accusedimposed on us and responsible employees or managers, and, in extreme cases, the incarceration of infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties.

Our business depends substantially onresponsible employees or managers. In addition, if our intellectual property rights, the protection of which is crucial to our business success. To protect our proprietary rights, we relychannel partners, agents or may in the future rely on a combination of trademark law and trade secret protection, copyright law and patent law. We also utilize contractual agreements, including, in certain circumstances, confidentiality agreements between the company and our employees, independent contractors and other advisors. These afford only limited protection, and unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our website and mobile application features, software and functionality, orconsultants fail to obtain and use information thatappropriate import, export or re-export licenses or authorizations, we consider proprietary or confidential, such as the technology used to operate our website, our content and company trademarks. We may also encounter difficulties in connection withbe adversely affected through reputational harm and penalties. Obtaining the acquisitionnecessary authorizations, including any required license, for a particular sale may be time-consuming, is not guaranteed and maintenance of domain names, and regulations governing domain names may not protect our trademarks and similar proprietary rights.
In addition, we may become subject to third-party claims that we infringe the proprietary rights of others. Such claims, regardless of their merits, may result in the expendituredelay or loss of significantsales opportunities. Changes in our products or changes in applicable export or import laws and regulations may also create delays in the introduction and sale of our products in international markets, prevent our end-customers with international operations from deploying our products or, in some cases, prevent the export or import of our products to certain countries, governments or persons altogether. Any change in export or import laws and regulations, shift in the enforcement or scope of existing laws and regulations, or change in the countries, governments, persons or technologies targeted by such laws and regulations, could also result in decreased use of our products, or in our decreased ability to export or sell our products to existing or potential end-customers with international operations. Any decreased use of our products or limitation on our ability to export or sell our products would likely adversely affect our business, financial condition and managerial resources, injunctions againstoperating results.

We are subject to governmental import duties that could significantly increase our costs.

The majority of our raw materials for our vehicles are shipped from the People’s Republic of China. U.S./China trade relations are in a highly volatile state of uncertainty which could significantly affect the tariffs applied to our products. In 2018, the United States government announced tariffs on certain steel and aluminum products, technological hardware, as well as automotive parts imported into the United States, which has led to reciprocal tariffs imposed by the European Union and other governments on products imported from the United States. The United States government has implemented tariffs on goods imported from China, and additional tariffs on goods imported from China are under consideration.

The battery industry (both lithium-ion and lead acid-based), as well as many of the components of our vehicles, have been subjected to tariffs implemented by the U.S. government on goods imported from China. If the United States and China are not able to resolve their differences, new and additional tariffs may be put in place on additional products, including raw materials we use to manufacture our vehicles. If additional tariffs and related taxes are applied to the cost of imports from China, our costs will continue to increase, and we may be required to substantially increase the sales prices of our vehicles. An increase in sales prices of our vehicles would likely adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. If we are unable to increase the sales prices of our vehicles to reflect the increase in the costs of the vehicles, it will result in lower gross margins on our vehicles.

New regulations or standards or changes in existing regulations or standards in the United States or internationally related to our suppliers’ products may result in unanticipated costs or liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and future sales, and could place additional burdens on the operations of our business.

Our suppliers’ products are subject to governmental regulations in many jurisdictions. To achieve and maintain market acceptance, our suppliers’ products must continue to comply with these statutory regulations and many industry standards. As these regulations and standards evolve, and if new regulations or standards are implemented, our suppliers may have to modify their products. The failure of their products to comply, or delays in compliance, with the existing and evolving industry regulations and standards could prevent or delay introduction of our vehicles, which could harm our business. Supplier uncertainty regarding future policies may also affect demand for electric vehicles, including our vehicles. Moreover, channel partners or customers may require us, or we may otherwise deem it necessary or advisable, to alter our products to address actual or anticipated changes in the paymentregulatory environment. Our inability to alter our products to address these requirements and any regulatory changes may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We could be adversely affected by violations of damages. the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws.

We may needhave international operations. The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar anti-bribery laws generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to obtain licenses from third parties who allegeforeign government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Practices in the local business communities of many countries outside the United States have a level of government corruption that is greater than that found in the developed world. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws, and we have infringed their rights, but such licenses mayestablished policies and procedures designed to monitor compliance with these anti-bribery law requirements; however, we cannot assure that our policies and procedures will protect us from potential reckless or criminal acts committed by individual employees or agents. If we are found to be liable for anti-bribery law violations, we could suffer from criminal or civil penalties or other sanctions that could have a material adverse effect on our business.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

Our corporate headquarters are located at 900 E. Old Settlers Blvd., Suite 100, Round Rock, Texas. We currently lease approximately 23,927 square feet of office space in Round Rock, Texas under a lease that expires in March 2027. The lease agreement provides for a base monthly rent, and we are also responsible for real estate taxes, maintenance and other operating expenses applicable to the leased premises.

In February 2021, we signed a sublease for approximately 7,500 square feet of additional office space under a lease that expires June 2022. The lease agreement provides for a base monthly rent, and we are also responsible for real estate taxes, maintenance and other operating expenses applicable to the leased premises.

We believe that these facilities are adequate for our present operations.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

On February 12, 2021, the Company entered into an agreement with Arcimoto, Inc. to settle certain patent infringement claims (the “Arcimoto Settlement”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to cease the production, importation and sale of the AYRO 311, among other things. Accordingly, AYRO would not be available on terms acceptablecontractually permitted to us or at all.

ITEM 1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2 – PROPERTIES
Our principal executive officeresume production of the AYRO 311. The Company is located at 1412 Broadway, Floor 21,continuing the development of an all-new, three-wheeled electric vehicle, which is intended to replace AYRO 311 as our three-wheeled electric vehicle product offering.

As of January 1, 2019, DropCar Operating, Inc. (“DropCar Operating”) had accrued approximately $0.23 million for the settlement of multiple employment disputes. As of December 31, 2020, a de minimis amount remained accrued as accounts payable and accrued expenses for the settlement of the final remaining employment dispute.

On March 23, 2018, DropCar Operating was made aware of an audit being conducted by the New York City, New York 10018. We operate underState Department of Labor (“DOL”) regarding a monthclaim filed by an employee. The DOL is investigating whether DropCar Operating properly paid overtime for which DropCar Operating has raised several defenses. In addition, the DOL is conducting its audit to month lease requiring 60 days’ notice. We believe our current facility is suitable and adequate to meetdetermine whether DropCar Operating owes spread of hours pay (an hour’s pay for each day an employee worked or was scheduled for a period over ten hours in a day). If the DOL determines that monies are owed, the DOL will seek a backpay order, which management believes will not, either individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our business, requirements. We intendconsolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Management believes the case has no merit.

DropCar was a defendant in a class action lawsuit which resulted in a judgement entered into whereby the Company is required to continue working from this or a nearby facilitypay legal fees in the same geographic location.


amount of $0.05 million to the plaintiff’s counsel. As of December 31, 2020, the balance due remains $0.05 millionITEM 3 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS, recorded as a component of accounts payable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, which arise in the ordinary course of business, that it believeswe believe are incidental to the operation of itsour business. While the outcome of these claims cannot be predicted with certainty, other than as set forth below, management does not believe that the outcome of any of these legal matters will have a material adverse effect on itsour results of operations, financial positions or cash flows.

In February 2018, we were served an Amended Summons and Complaint in the Supreme Court of the City of New York, Bronx county originally served solely on an individual, our former customer, for injuries sustained by plaintiffs alleging such injuries were caused by either the customer, our valet operating the customer’s vehicle or an unknown driver operating customer’s vehicle. We to date have cooperated with the New York City Police Department and no charges have been brought against any of our employees. We have referred the matter to our insurance carrier. As of June 12, 2019, this case has been settled by the insurance carrier.
On February 9, 2016, an employee of ours was transporting a customer’s vehicle when the vehicle caught fire. On November 22, 2016, an insurance company (as subrogee of the vehicle’s owner) filed for indemnification and subrogation against us in the Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. Our management believes that it is not responsible for the damage caused by the vehicle fire and that the fire was not due to any negligence on the part of us. In 2018, the parties reached a settlement the case was closed.
As of December 31, 2019, we had accrued approximately $320,000 for the settlement of multiple employment disputes. As of December 31, 2019, approximately $226,000 of this amount was for settled matters. We still have outstanding potential liability of $94,000 related to the unsettled employment disputes.
As of December 31, 2019, we had accrued approximately $333,000 for potential New York State Department of Labor (“DOL”) spread-of-hours violation. At the end of December 2019, our labor counsel notified the DOL that we have a number of issues/objections with this decision we received on December 24, 2019. The investigator confirmed receipt of our response. This case will likely go to a hearing.
We were a defendant in a class action lawsuit which resulted in a judgement entered into whereby we are required to pay legal fees in the amount of $45,000 to the plaintiff’s counsel. As of December 31, 2019, we recorded $45,000 as accrued expense in relation to this lawsuit.
Proceedings by Former Employees
There is a pending claim of race and gender discrimination involving our former employee, Joanne Lewis, at the New York City Commission on Human Rights. Ms. Lewis also asserted a claim of retaliation. In June 2015, we submitted a Verified Answer and Position Statement denying all allegations of discrimination and retaliation. We are confident in the factual and legal defenses to Ms. Lewis’s claim. Since the submission of our Verified Answer and Position Statement, we have not heard from the Commission or Ms. Lewis. No amount was accrued for this case. In March 2020, the U.S. EEOC adopted the finding of the Commission related to the discrimination complaint and issued a notice of dismissal.
In January 2019, the same DOL investigator who conducted the audit of us notified us that two former employees – Joshua Dixon and Ugur Gencaslan – had filed a complaint with the DOL, wherein they alleged they were not properly paid for all overtime worked during July 2017. On January 23, 2019, we provided the DOL with a written response denying that any monies were owed to the employees. In addition, we provided the DOL with time records and pay records for each employee for the relevant time period. Since the submission of these documents in January 2019, we have not heard from the DOL. No amount was accrued for this case.
Qasim Khan
This case involves a rear-end collision which occurred on August 1, 2018 in Manhattan when our driver hit the back of a car which had reportedly stopped for a pedestrian. The suit was filed in Kings County Supreme Court (Brooklyn) against us and the driver and the owner of the car. Such a collision is virtually always judged to be the fault of the car in back, regardless of the suddenness of the stop.
The injuries alleged by the plaintiff at this early point in the litigation, with the majority of medical records yet to be produced, include the left shoulder requiring arthroscopic surgery, to repair a rotator cuff tear, bursitis and synovitis, and a partial tear of the labrum. MRIs are reported to have revealed herniations in the plaintiff’s lumbar spine, as well as bulges in his cervical spine; and plaintiff has had various claims of headaches, neck, and knee and ankle pain, all while undergoing extensive chiropractic care, as well as acupuncture and physical therapy.

Evidence of the plaintiff’s having sought care for his left shoulder only weeks before this accident raises questions of causation/aggravation of existing injuries. At this point, due to the unknowns, we assess the possible verdict range as being between $80,000 and $275,000, given the very wide range of reported shoulder operation verdicts, and back injury awards as well. The present settlement value should be, we believe, regarded as between $70,000 and $110,000. We anticipate that the final verdict will be settled by our insurance carrier. No additional exposure is expected as the deductible has been paid.
William Hart
This case stems from a rear-end collision on July 15, 2017 in Manhattan, in which our driver struck the plaintiff’s vehicle from behind, at what he reports as under 5 m.p.h. Plaintiff has filed a motion for summary judgment on liability, which is likely to be granted, as this is close to automatic, unless something unusual happened such as the front vehicle darting in front of the rear vehicle abruptly. Here, our client driver does not dispute the plaintiff’s account, and thus liability will not be an issue.
Causation of the allegedly very extensive injuries is very much an issue, however. Plaintiff has produced records of having undergone two shoulder operations, as well as separate cervical and lumbar spinal fusion operations, with implanted cervical cages and plate, and lumbar cage, instrumentation and bone graft. In addition, he underwent multiple epidural injections. He is a man in his mid-50s, with possibly prior-existing conditions, and who was in an accident subsequent to this one, in January of this year, just several months prior to his two spinal fusion operations. He did not report injuries from that accident; however, it appears from the police report and insurance report to have prompted bodily injuries to the two people in the other car; and he appears to have been more at fault. The question thus arises of whether he did not report injuries because he was at fault and knew he had a separate ongoing case of his own in which he did not have liability.
As noted above with respect to Burton, the cost of spinal fusions, especially in the Bronx, can easily exceed $1 million. This legal proceeding involves two spinal fusions, in addition to two shoulder operations that were performed three months after the accident. Based upon those operations, plaintiff’s counsel has tendered the case to James River, seeking the full policy.
It is, however, too early to assess the likelihood of a seven-figure verdict, or even the settlement value of the case. This is because there are many more medical records to obtain, as well as suspicious circumstances calling causation issues into question, including the low-impact nature of the collision; the plaintiff’s having refused medical treatment from nearby emergency medical personnel immediately after the accident; and the fusion operations coming so long after the accident, and only months subsequent to another accident.
Daniel Gelbtuch
Daniel Gelbtuch, who was employed by us beginning July 2017 and terminated on September 13, 2018, claimed $91,500 for the immediate payment of outstanding salary and benefits owed. On April 22, 2019, we offered Mr. Gelbtuch $10,500 to settle the matter. Neither Mr. Gelbtuch nor his counsel has responded to the offer. We have accrued $40,000 at December 31, 2019 and 2018 in relation to this claim.
Martin Limchayseng
An accident occurred on or about October 4, 2017 at the location of 251 Ave C, New York, New York, between a vehicle operated and controlled by Martin Limchayseng, who was our driver, which said vehicle was owned by plaintiff’s subrogor, and a motor vehicle owned by a third party which was damaged in sum of $7,280. There was no physical injury in this damage claim. This case is investigated internally. There are no updates on this case as of January 27, 2020. As of December 31, 2019, we have accrued $7,280 as accrued expense in relation to this claim.

ITEM 4 – MINE4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURESDISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.


PART II

ITEM 5 – MARKET5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIESSECURITIES.

Price Range of Common Stock

Market Information

Our common stock is currently tradedtrades on The Nasdaqthe NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “DCAR”“AYRO”.

On December 31, 2020, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market was $6.08 per share.

Stockholders

As of March 25, 2020, we had 33 holders30, 2021, there were approximately 148 stockholders of record of our common stock. As of March 25, 2020, the closing bid price of our common stock was $0.43 per share.

Dividend Policy

Dividends

We have nevernot paid aany cash dividend ondividends to our common stockstockholders since inception and do not anticipate paying anyplan to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any future declaration of dividends will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, prospects and any other factors that our board of directors deems relevant, as well as compliance with the requirements of state law. In general, as a Delaware corporation, we may pay dividends out of surplus capital or, if there is no surplus capital, out of net profits for the fiscal year in which a dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year. We currently intend to retain future earnings, to fund ongoing operations and future capital requirements ofif any, for reinvestment in our business. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of the Board, in compliance with Delaware corporate law and will be dependent upon our financial conditions, results of operations, capital requirements and such other factors as the Board deems relevant. Our preferred stock has the right to participate in any declared dividend on common shares to the same extent as if such preferred holders had converted each preferred share to common stock.

Equity Compensation Plans

  Equity Compensation Plan Information 
  (a)  (b)  (c) 
  Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights  Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (1)  Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a)) 
Plan Category:            
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders: 2020 LTIP (Options and Restricted Stock)  1,959,787  $3.06   2,051,537 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders: 2017 LTIP (Options) (2)  971,549   2.83    
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders: 2014 DropCar (Options)  61,440   46.95    

Other equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

         
Total  2,992,776       2,051,537 

(1)The weighted-average exercise price set forth in this column is calculated excluding outstanding restricted stock awards since recipients of such awards are not required to pay an exercise price to receive shares subject to these awards.
(2)Represents shares of common stock deliverable upon exercise of options under the 2017 LTIP adopted by AYRO Operating prior to the Merger.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

None.

ITEM 6 - SELECTED6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

On November 19, 2020, the SEC issued final rules to amend Regulation S-K. These changes are effective for annual filings for the first fiscal year ending on or after August 9, 2021, and early adoption is permitted. We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2elected to adopt the amendments to Item 301 of Regulation S-K in their entirety, which remove the requirement to furnish selected financial data for each of the Exchange Act, and are not required to provide the information required under this item.


last five fiscal years.

ITEM 7 – MANAGEMENT’S7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our historical financial statements and the related notes thereto. This management’s discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Any statements that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. When used, the words “believe,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “target,” “estimate,” “expect” and the like, and/or future tense or conditional constructions (“will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” etc.), or similar expressions, identify certain of these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including those under “Risk Factors” in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Our actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of several factors.

Overview
Strategy
Prior See “Forward-Looking Statements.”

References in this management’s discussion and analysis to January 30, 2018,“we,” “us,” “our,” “our Company” or “AYRO” refer to AYRO, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Overview

Merger

On May 28, 2020, pursuant to the previously announced Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated December 19, 2019 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among AYRO, Inc., a Delaware corporation previously known as DropCar, Inc., ABC Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), and AYRO Operating Company (“AYRO Operating”), a Delaware corporation previously known as AYRO, Inc., Merger Sub was merged with and into AYRO Operating, with AYRO Operating continuing after the merger as the surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”). At the effective time of the Merger, without any action on the part of any stockholder, each issued and outstanding share of AYRO Operating’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“AYRO Operating Common Stock”), including shares underlying AYRO Operating’s outstanding equity awards and warrants, was converted into the right to receive 1.3634 pre-split and pre-stock dividend shares (the “Exchange Ratio”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Company Common Stock”). As part of the Merger, we received cash of $3.06 million in consideration for 2,337,663 shares of common stock. Upon completion of the Merger and the transactions contemplated in the Merger Agreement and assuming the exercise in full of all pre-funded warrants issued pursuant thereto, (i) the former AYRO Operating equity holders (including the investors in a bridge financing and private placements that closed prior to closing of the Merger) owned approximately 79% of the outstanding equity of the Company; (ii) former DropCar stockholders owned approximately 18% of the outstanding equity of the Company; and (iii) a financial advisor to DropCar and AYRO owned approximately 3% of the outstanding equity of the Company.

The Merger was treated as a reverse recapitalization effected by a share exchange for financial accounting and reporting purposes because substantially all of DropCar, Inc.’s operations were disposed of as part of the consummation of the Merger and therefore no goodwill or other intangible assets were recorded by the Company as a result of the Merger. AYRO Operating was treated as the accounting acquirer as its stockholders controlled the Company after the Merger, even though DropCar, Inc. was the legal acquirer. As a result, the assets and liabilities and the historical operations that are reflected in our consolidated financial statements are those of AYRO Operating as if AYRO Operating had always been the reporting company.

Reverse Stock Split and Stock Dividend

On May 28, 2020, immediately following the effective time of the Merger, we effected a reverse stock split of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock, at a ratio of one share for ten shares (the “Reverse Stock Split”). Immediately following the Reverse Stock Split, we issued a stock dividend of one share of the Company’s common stock for each outstanding share of common stock to all holders of record immediately following the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split (the “Stock Dividend”). The net result of the Reverse Stock Split and the Stock Dividend was a privately-held provider1-for-5 reverse stock split. We made proportionate adjustments to the per share exercise price and/or the number of automotiveshares issuable upon the exercise or vesting of all stock options, restricted stock units (if any) and warrants outstanding as of the effective times of the Reverse Stock Split and the Stock Dividend in accordance with the terms of each security based on the split or dividend ratio. Also, we reduced the number of shares reserved for issuance under our equity compensation plans proportionately based on the split and dividend ratios. Except for adjustments that resulted from the rounding up of fractional shares to the next whole share, the Reverse Stock Split and Stock Dividend affected all stockholders uniformly and did not change any stockholder’s percentage ownership interest in the Company. The Reverse Stock Split did not alter the par value of Company Common Stock, $0.0001 per share, or modify any voting rights or other terms of the common stock. Except as otherwise set forth herein, share and related option or warrant information presented in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations have been adjusted to reflect the reduced number of shares outstanding, the increase in share price which resulted from these actions or otherwise to give effect to the Reverse Stock Split and the Stock Dividend.

Transactions Related to the Merger

Simultaneous with the signing of the Merger Agreement, accredited investors, including certain investors in DropCar, purchased $1.0 million of AYRO Operating’s convertible bridge notes bearing interest at the rate of 5% per annum (the “Bridge Notes”). The Bridge Notes automatically converted into 1,030,585 shares of AYRO Operating Common Stock immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger representing an aggregate of 7.45% of the outstanding common stock of the combined company after giving effect to the Merger. Pursuant to the terms of the Bridge Notes, immediately prior to the closing of the Merger, the five lenders received warrants to purchase 1,030,585 shares of AYRO Operating Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.1159 per share. In conjunction with the bridge notes, we issued Palladium Capital Advisors, LLC (together with its affiliates, “Palladium”), our advisor, a warrant to purchase 72,141 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.1159 per share.

In addition, immediately prior to the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement, AYRO Operating entered into agreements with accredited investors, including certain stockholders of DropCar, pursuant to which such investors agreed to purchase, prior to the consummation of the Merger, 543,179 shares of AYRO Operating Common Stock (or common stock equivalents or pre-funded warrants to purchase 429,305 shares of Company Common Stock) representing an aggregate of 16.55% of the outstanding common stock of the combined company after giving effect to the Merger and warrants to purchase an equivalent number of shares of AYRO Operating Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1.2 million (the “AYRO Private Placement”). Pursuant to the terms of the AYRO Private Placement, immediately prior to the closing of the Merger, the investors received warrants to purchase 972,486 shares of AYRO Operating Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.3599 per share. On the closing date of the Merger, AYRO Operating issued to the investors party to this second AYRO Operating Private Placement SPA (i) an aggregate of approximately 1,030,039 shares of common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase 286,896 shares of Company Common Stock for an aggregate of $0.85 million and warrants to purchase 1,316,936 shares of AYRO Operating Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.7423 per share. In conjunction with the AYRO Private Placement, we issued Palladium, our advisor, a warrant to purchase 92,186 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.7423 per share and a warrant to purchase 68,074 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.3599 per share.

As additional consideration to the lead investor in the AYRO Private Placement, AYRO Operating also entered into a stock subscription agreement with the lead investor, pursuant to which, immediately prior to the Merger, AYRO Operating issued pre-funded warrants to purchase an aggregate of 477,190 shares of AYRO Operating Common Stock for the nominal per share purchase price of $0.000367 per share.

As part of the Merger, the Company issued to Palladium Holdings, LLC, its advisor, 415,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share.

On December 19, 2019, AYRO Operating entered into a letter agreement with ALS Investment, LLC (“ALS”), pursuant to which AYRO Operating issued ALS 622,496 shares of AYRO Operating Common Stock, which equaled 4.5% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the combined company giving effect to the Merger. In addition to introducing AYRO Operating and DropCar, ALS agreed to provide, as an independent contractor, consulting services to us relating to financial, capital market and investor relations for twelve months following the closing of the Merger.

In February 2020, AYRO Operating received a $0.5 million secured loan from certain existing investors in DropCar and AYRO Operating, and, in connection therewith, we received $10,000 upon exercise of the previously issued warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock. The entire amount of the loan was paid off upon closing of the Merger.

In April 2020, AYRO Operating issued a secured promissory note payable to an individual investor providing $0.6 million of short-term financing. The note carried an interest rate of fifteen percent (15%) and was to be repaid upon the earlier of (1) closing date of the pending the Merger and (2) July 14, 2020. Fifty percent (50%) of the principal amount was personally guaranteed by Mark Adams, a former director of AYRO Operating and AYRO. In conjunction with the notes 553,330 shares of common stock (276,665 shares of common stock representing two percent (2%) of the combined company’s post-merger outstanding common stock each) were issued to the lender and to Mr. Adams as compensation for his personal guarantee. The entire amount of the loan was paid off upon the closing of the Merger.

Other AYRO Operating Warrants

At the effective time of the Merger, each AYRO Operating warrant that was outstanding and unexercised immediately prior to the effective time was converted pursuant to its terms and became a warrant to purchase Company Common Stock.

Closing of Asset Purchase Agreement

On December 19, 2019, DropCar entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with DC Partners Acquisition, LLC (“DC Partners”), Spencer Richardson and David Newman, pursuant to which DropCar agreed to sell substantially all of the assets associated with its business of providing vehicle support, fleet logistics and concierge services for both consumers and the automotive industry. In 2015, we launched our cloud-based Enterprise Vehicle Assistance and Logistics (“VAL”) platform and mobile application (“App”) to assist consumers and automotive-related companies reduce the costs, hassles and inefficiencies of owning a car, or fleet of cars, in urban centers. Our VAL platform is a web-based interface to our core service that coordinates the movements and schedules of trained valets who pickup and drop off cars at dealerships and customer locations. The App tracks progress and provides email and/or text notifications on status to customers, increasing the quality of communication and subsequent satisfaction with the service. To date, we operate primarily in the New York metropolitan area and may expand our territory in the future.

We achieve this balance of increased consumer flexibility and lower consumer cost by aggregating demand for parking and other automotive services and redistributing their fulfillment to partners in the city and on city outskirt areas that have not traditionally had access to lucrative city business. Beyond the immediate unit economic benefits of securing bulk discounts from vendor partners, we believe there is significant opportunity to further provide additional products and services to clients across the vehicle lifecycle.
 On the enterprise side, original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), dealers, and other service providers in the automotive space are increasingly being challenged with consumers who have limited time to bring in their vehicles for maintenance and service, making it difficult to retain valuable post-sale service contracts or scheduled consumer maintenance and service appointments. Additionally, many of the vehicle support centers for automotive providers (i.e., dealerships, including body work and diagnostic shops) have moved out of urban areas thus making it more challenging for OEMs and dealers in urban areas to provide convenient and efficient service for their consumer and business clientele. Similarly, shared mobility providers and other fleet managers, such as rental car companies, face a similar urban mobility challenge: getting cars to and from service bays, rebalancing vehicle availability to meet demand and getting vehicles from dealer lots to fleet locations.
We are able to offer our enterprise services at a fraction of the cost of alternatives, including other third parties or expensive in-house resources, given our pricing model that reduces and/or eliminates any downtime expense while also giving clients access to a network of trained valets on demand that can be scaled up or down based on the real time needs of the enterprise client. We support this model by maximizing the utilization of our employee-valet workforce across a curated pipeline for both the consumer and business network.
While our business-to-business (“B2B”) and business-to-consumer (“B2C”) services generate revenue and help meet the unmet demand for vehicle support services, we are also building-out a platform and customer base that positions us well for developments in the automotive space where vehicle ownership becomes more car-shared or access based with transportation services and concierge options well-suited to match a customer’s immediate needs. For example, certain car manufacturers are testing new services in which customers pay the manufacturer a flat fee per month to drive a number of different models for any length of time. We believe that our unique blend of B2B and B2C services make us well suited to introduce, and provide the services necessary to execute, this next generation of automotive subscription services.

 Merger with AYRO
On December 19, 2019, we entered into the AYRO Merger Agreement with Merger Sub, and AYRO, pursuant to which, among other matters, and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in the AYRO Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into AYRO, with AYRO continuing as our wholly owned subsidiary and the surviving corporation of the AYRO Merger.  The AYRO Merger is intended to qualify for federal income tax purposes as a tax-free reorganization under the provisions of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the AYRO Merger Agreement, at the closing of the AYRO Merger, (a) each outstanding share of AYRO common stock and AYRO preferred stock will be converted into the right to receive shares of our common stock (after giving effect to a reverse stock split of our common stock, as described below) equal to the Exchange Ratio described below; and (b) each outstanding AYRO stock option and AYRO warrant that has not previously been exercised prior to the closing of the AYRO Merger will be assumed by us.
Under the exchange ratio formula in the AYRO Merger Agreement (the “Exchange Ratio”), upon the closing of the AYRO Merger, on a pro forma basis and based upon the number of shares of our common stock to be issued in the AYRO Merger, our current shareholders (along with our financial advisor) will own approximately 20% of the combined company and current AYRO investors will own approximately 80% of the combined company (including the additional financing transaction referenced below). For purposes of calculating the Exchange Ratio, the number of outstanding shares of our common stock immediately prior to the AYRO Merger does not take into effect the dilutive effect of shares of our common stock underlying options, warrants or certain classes of preferred stock outstanding as of the date of the AYRO Merger Agreement.
In connection with the AYRO Merger, we will seek the approval of our stockholders to amend our certificate of incorporation to: (i) effect a reverse split of our common stock at a ratio to be determined by us, which is intended to ensure that the listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market, or such other stock market on which our common stock is trading, are satisfied and (ii) change our name to AYRO, Inc., subject to the consummation of the AYRO Merger.
Prior to the execution and delivery of the AYRO Merger Agreement, and as a condition of the willingness of the parties to enter into the AYRO Merger Agreement, certain stockholders have entered into agreements with AYRO pursuant to which such stockholders have agreed, subject to the terms and conditions of such agreements, to purchase, prior to the consummation of the AYRO Merger, shares of AYRO’s common stock (or common stock equivalents) and warrants to purchase AYRO 's common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $2.0 million (the “AYRO Pre-Closing Financing”). The consummation of the transactions contemplated by such agreements is conditioned upon the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in the AYRO Merger Agreement. After consummation of the AYRO Merger, AYRO has agreed to cause us to register the resale of our common stock issued and issuable pursuant to the warrants issued to the investors in the AYRO Pre-Closing Financing.
Consummation of the AYRO Merger is subject to certain closing conditions, including, among other things, approval by our stockholders and the stockholders of AYRO, the continued listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market after the AYRO Merger and satisfaction of minimum net cash thresholds by us and AYRO.  In accordance with the terms of the AYRO Merger Agreement, (i) certain executive officers, directors and stockholders of AYRO (solely in their respective capacities as AYRO stockholders) holding approximately 57% of the outstanding AYRO capital stock have entered into voting agreements with us to vote all of their shares of AYRO capital stock in favor of adoption of the AYRO Merger Agreement (the “AYRO Voting Agreements”) and (ii) certain executive officers, directors and stockholders of ours (solely in their respective capacities as our stockholders) holding approximately 10% of the outstanding our common stock have entered into voting agreements with AYRO to vote all of their shares of our common stock in favor of approval of the AYRO Merger Agreement (the “DropCar Voting Agreements”, and together with the AYRO Voting Agreements, the “Voting Agreements”).  The Voting Agreements include covenants with respect to the voting of such shares in favor of approving the transactions contemplated by the AYRO Merger Agreement and against any competing acquisition proposals.  In addition, concurrently with the execution of the AYRO Merger Agreement, (i) certain executive officers, directors and stockholders of AYRO and (ii) certain directors of ours have entered into lock-up agreements (the “Lock-Up Agreements”) pursuant to which they accepted certain restrictions on transfers of shares of our common stock for the one-year period following the closing of the AYRO Merger.

The AYRO Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for both us and AYRO, and further provides that, upon termination of the AYRO Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, either party may be required to pay the other party a termination fee of $1,000,000, or in some circumstances reimburse the other party’s reasonable expenses. 
At the effective time of the AYRO Merger, our Board of Directors is expected to consist of seven members, three of whom will be designated by AYRO, three of whom will be designated by us and one of whom will be designated by the lead investor in the AYRO Pre-Closing Financing. The AYRO Merger Agreement contains certain provisions providing for the ability of AYRO to designate additional members upon the achievement of certain business milestones. As a condition to the consummation of the AYRO Merger, we will immediately prior to the AYRO Merger enter into an executive employment agreement with Rodney Keller, the current chief executive officer of AYRO.
Simultaneously with the execution of the AYRO Merger Agreement, AYRO entered into a Loan and Security Agreement, dated December 19, 2019 (the “Loan Agreement”), by and among AYRO and the financial institutions and individuals signatories thereto, pursuant to which, on December 19, 2019, AYRO received aggregate gross proceeds of $1,000,000. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the aggregate obligations of AYRO under the Loan Agreement are to automatically, immediately prior to the consummation of the AYRO Merger, convert into shares of AYRO common stock, subject to the terms and provisions of the Loan Agreement. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, upon conversion of the term loans made by the investors subject to the terms of the Loan Agreement, AYRO is required to cause us to issue each bridge investor warrants to purchase our common stock. Upon consummation of the AYRO Merger, AYRO has agreed to cause us to register the resale of the warrant shares.
In connection with the AYRO Merger, AYRO entered into the Stock Subscription Agreement with an accredited investor, pursuant to which, immediately prior to the AYRO Merger, AYRO will issue upindustry to an aggregate of 1,750,000 shares of AYRO common stock forentity controlled by Messrs. Richardson and Newman, the nominal per share purchase price of $0.001 per share, or, if applicable, pre-funded warrants to purchase AYRO common stock, in lieu of AYRO common stock. The consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Stock Subscription Agreement is conditioned upon the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in the AYRO Merger Agreement.
Discontinued Operations – DropCar Operating
On December 19, 2019 and concurrently upon entering in the AYRO Merger Agreement, we entered into an asset purchase agreement (“Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among us, DropCar Operating Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation and our wholly owned subsidiary (“DropCar Operating”), and DC Partners Acquisition, LLC (the “Purchaser”), Spencer Richardson, our Co-Founder andCompany’s Chief Executive Officer and David Newman, our Co-Founder and Chief Business Development Officer , pursuant to which we agreed to sell substantially all ofat the assets associated with our DropCar Operating business of providing vehicle support, fleet logistics and concierge services.time, respectively. The aggregate purchase price for the purchased assets consistsconsisted of the cancellation of certain liabilities pursuant to those certain employment agreements by and between DropCar Operating and each of Mr.Messrs. Richardson and Mr. Newman, plus the assumption of certain liabilities relating to, or arising out of, workers’ compensation claims that occurred prior to the closing date of the Asset Purchase Agreement. On May 28, 2020, the parties to the Asset Purchase Agreement entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement Amendment”), which Asset Purchase Agreement Amendment (i) provides for the inclusion of up to $0.03 million in refunds associated with certain insurance premiums as assets being purchased by DC Partners, (ii) amends the covenant associated with the funding of the DropCar business, such that DropCar provided the DropCar business with additional funding of approximately $0.18 million at the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement and (iii) provides for a current employee of the Company being transferred to DC Partners to provide transition services to the Company for a period of three months after the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement. The Asset Purchase Agreement closed on May 28, 2020, immediately following the consummation of the Merger.

Business

Prior to the Merger, DropCar provided consumer and enterprise solutions to urban automobile-related logistical challenges. Following the Merger, we design, manufacture and market three- and four-wheeled purpose-built electric vehicles primarily to commercial customers. These vehicles allow the end user an environmentally friendly alternative to internal combustion engines for light duty uses, including logistics, maintenance and cargo services, at a lower total cost of ownership. Our four-wheeled vehicles are classified as low-speed vehicles (LSVs) based on federal and state regulations and are ideal for both college and corporate campuses. We are currently developing our next generation three-wheeled vehicle that we expect to be classified as a motorcycle for federal purposes and an autocycle in states that have passed certain autocycle laws, allowing the user to operate the vehicle with a standard automobile driver’s license. Our next generation three-wheeled vehicle is not expected to be an LSV and is expected to be ideal for last-mile delivery applications. The majority of our sales are comprised of sales of our four-wheeled vehicle to Club Car, a division of Ingersoll Rand, Inc., through a strategic arrangement entered in early 2019. We plan to continue growing our business through our experienced management team by leveraging our supply chain, allowing us to scale production without a large capital investment.

We have also developed a strategic partnership with Autonomic, a division of Ford. Pursuant to our agreement with Autonomic, we received a license to use Autonomic’s transportation mobility cloud and have agreed to jointly develop the monetization of cloud-based vehicle applications with Autonomic.

Manufacturing Agreement with Cenntro

In April 2017, AYRO Operating entered into a Manufacturing Licensing Agreement (the “MLA”) with Cenntro Automotive Group, Ltd. (“Cenntro”), one of our equity holders, that provides for its four-wheel sub-assemblies to be licensed and sold to us for final manufacturing and sale in the United States.

Under the MLA, in order for us to maintain our exclusive territorial rights pursuant to the MLA, for the first three years after March 22, 2020, we must meet the following minimum purchase requirements, which we believe we satisfied for the initial period: (i) a minimum of 300 units sold by the first anniversary of the effective date of the MLA; (ii) a minimum of 800 units sold by the second anniversary of the effective date of the MLA; and (iii) a minimum of 1,300 units sold by the third anniversary of the effective date of the MLA. Cenntro will determine the minimum sale requirements for the years thereafter. Should any event of default occur, the other party may terminate the MLA by providing written notice to the defaulting party, who will have 90 days from the effective date of the notice to cure the default. Unless waived by the party providing notice, a failure to cure the default(s) within the time 90-day time frame will result in the automatic termination of the MLA. Events of default under the MLA include a failure to make a required payment when due, the insolvency or bankruptcy of either party, the subjection of either party’s property to any levy, seizure, general assignment for the benefit of creditors, and a failure to make available or deliver the products in the time and manner provided for in the MLA. We are dependent on the MLA, and in the event of its termination our manufacturing operations and customer deliveries would be seriously impacted.

Master Procurement Agreement with Club Car

In March 2019, AYRO Operating entered into a five-year Master Procurement Agreement (the “MPA”), with Club Car for the sale of DropCar Operating represented a strategic shiftour four-wheeled vehicle. The MPA grants Club Car the exclusive right to sell our four-wheeled vehicle in North America, provided that has had a major effect onClub Car orders at least 500 vehicles per year. Although Club Car did not meet the volume threshold for 2020, we currently have no intentions of selling our operations, and therefore, was presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of operations and consolidated statement of cash flows.


Our Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
Our financial statements as of December 31, 2019 were prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern. The independent registered public accounting firm that audited our 2019 financial statements, in their report, included an explanatory paragraph referring to our recurring losses since inception and expressing substantial doubt in our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Our ability to continue as a going concern depends on our ability to obtain additional equity or debt financing, attain further operating efficiencies, reduce expenditures, and, ultimately, to generate additional revenue. We cannot assure you, however, that we will be able to achieve any of the foregoing.
There have been recent outbreaks in several countries, including the United States, of the highly transmissible and pathogenic coronavirus. The outbreak of such communicable diseases could result in a widespread health crisis that could adversely affect general commercial activity and the economies and financial markets of many countries, including the United States. At the time of this filing, the coronavirus has not had a material impact to our operations or financial results, however any future impacts of the coronavirus are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. An outbreak of communicable diseases, or the perception that such an outbreak could occur, and the measures taken by the governments of countries affected could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Merger with WPCS
On January 30, 2018, we completed our business combination with DropCar, Inc. (“Private DropCar”) in accordance with the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of September 6, 2017, as subsequently amended, by and among us, DC Acquisition Corporation (“WPCS Merger Sub”), and Private DropCar (as amended, the “WPCS Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which WPCS Merger Sub merged with and into Private DropCar, with Private DropCar surviving as our wholly owned subsidiary (the “WPCS Merger”). On January 30, 2018, in connection with, and prior to the completion of, the WPCS Merger, we effected a 1:4 reverse stock split of our common stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”), and on January 30, 2018, immediately after completion of the WPCS Merger, we changed our name to “DropCar, Inc.”
four-wheeled vehicles other than exclusively through Club Car. Under the terms of the WPCS Merger Agreement,MPA, we issued sharesreceive orders from Club Car dealers for vehicles of our common stock to Private DropCar’s stockholders, atspecific configurations, and we invoice Club Car once the vehicle has shipped. The MPA has an exchange ratioinitial term of 0.3273 shares of our common stock (the “WPCS Exchange Ratio”), after taking into account the Reverse Stock Split,five (5) years commencing January 1, 2019 and may be renewed by Club Car for each share of (i) Private DropCar common stock and preferred stock and (ii) Private DropCar warrants, in each case, outstanding immediatelysuccessive one-year periods upon 60 days’ prior written notice. Pursuant to the WPCS Merger. The WPCS Exchange Ratio was determined through arms’-length negotiations between usMPA, we granted Club Car a right of first refusal for sales of 51% or more of AYRO Operating’s assets or equity interests, which right of first refusal is exercisable for a period of 45 days following AYRO Operating’s delivery of an acquisition notice to Club Car. We also agreed to collaborate with Club Car on new products similar to our four-wheeled vehicle and Private DropCar.
In connectionimprovements to existing products and granted Club Car a right of first refusal to purchase similar commercial utility vehicles we develop during the term of the MPA. We are currently engaged in discussions with the WPCS Merger, Private DropCar was deemedClub Car to develop additional products to be the accounting acquirer because the stockholders of Private DropCar effectively control the combined company following the WPCS Merger. The WPCS Merger was treated as a reverse acquisition.
Divestiture of Suisun City Operations, a wholly owned subsidiary of DropCar, Inc.
On December 24, 2018, we completed the sale of 100% of the corporate capital of WPCS International - Suisun City, Inc. (the “Suisun City Operations”), our wholly owned subsidiary. In accordance with accounting guidance, a business segment that is disposed of meets the criteria to be classified as a discontinued operation. As all of the required criteria for the discontinued operation classification were met, the revenuesold by Club Car in Europe and expenses for this operation were included in the income from operations of discontinued component, on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The net sales of this business in 2018 prior to the divestiture were approximately $13.7 million. The sale price was $3.5 million paid in cash and resulted in a loss on the sale in the amount of $4.2 million. This loss is presented as part of discontinued operations, separate from continuing operations, on the Consolidated Statement of Operations, resulting in an increase in loss per share of approximately $2.85 for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Recent Developments
Nasdaq Hearing
On September 6, 2019, we received notification from The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) stating that we did not comply with the minimum $1.00 bid price requirement for continued listing set forth in Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (the “Listing Rule”). In accordance with Nasdaq listing rules, we were afforded 180 calendar days (until March 4, 2020) to regain compliance with the Listing Rule. On March 5, 2020, we received notification from the Listing Qualification Department of Nasdaq that we had not regained compliance with the Listing Rule. The notification indicated that our common stock would be delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market unless we request an appeal of this determination. On March 12, 2020, we requested a hearing to appeal the determination with the Nasdaq Hearings Panel (the “Panel”), which will stay the delisting of our securities pending the Panel’s decision. The hearing is scheduled for April 16, 2020. Our appeal to the Panel included a plan that sets forth a commitment to consider all available options to regain compliance with the Listing Rule, including the option to effectuate a reverse stock split upon receipt of stockholder approval, which we intend to seek in connection with the joint proxy statement and consent solicitation statement/prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2020 in connection with the AYRO Merger, in order to bring our stock price over the $1.00 bid price requirement and to meet the $4.00 bid price initial listing requirement. However,Asia but there can be no assurance that wethese discussions will be successfulsuccessful. For the year ended December 31, 2020, revenues from Club Car constituted approximately 68% of our revenue, as compared to 75% in regaining compliance with the Listing Rule.
Exchange Agreements
2019. Any loss of, or a significant reduction in purchases by, Club Car that constitutes a significant portion of our sales could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

Recent Developments

On February 5,June 17, 2020, we entered into separate exchange agreements (the “Exchange Agreements”) with the holders of existing Series H-5 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series H-5 Shares”), par value $0.0001 per share, to exchange an equivalent number of shares of our Series H-6 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series H-6 Shares”), par value $0.0001 per share (the “Exchange”). The Exchange closed on February 5, 2020. The purpose of the exchange was to include voting rights.

On February 5, 2020, we filed the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series H-6 Shares (the “Series H-6 Certificate of Designation”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, establishing and designating the rights, powers and preferences of the Series H-6 Shares. We designated up to 50,000 shares of Series H-6 Shares and each share has a stated value of $72.00 (the “Stated Value”). Each Series H-6 Share is convertible at any time at the option of the holder thereof, into a number of shares of common stock of the Company determined by dividing the H-6 Stated Value by the initial conversion price of $0.72 per share, subject to a 9.99% blocker provision. The Series H-6 Shares have the same dividend rights as the common stock, except as provided for in the Series H-6 Certificate of Designation or as otherwise required by law. The Series H-6 Shares also have the same voting rights as the common stock, except that in no event shall a holder of Series H-6 Shares be permitted to exercise a greater number of votes than such holder would have been entitled to cast if the Series H-6 Shares had immediately been converted into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to $0.78 (subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations, reorganizations, reclassifications, combinations, reverse stock splits or other similar events). In addition, a holder (together with its affiliates) may not be permitted to vote Series H-6 Shares held by such holder to the extent that such holder would beneficially own more than 9.99% of our common stock. In the event of any liquidation or dissolution, the Series H-6 Shares ranks senior to the common stock in the distribution of assets, to the extent legally available for distribution.

Securities Offerings
Private Placements
On March 8, 2018, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreementsecurities purchase agreement with certain institutional and accredited investors, pursuant to which we issuedagreed to the investorsissue and sell in a registered direct offering an aggregate of 26,8432,200,000 shares of our Series H-4 Convertible Preferred Stock,common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, (the “Series H-4 Shares”),at an offering price of $2.50 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $5.50 million before the deduction of fees and warrantsoffering expenses.

On July 6, 2020, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain institutional and accredited investors, pursuant to purchase 447,383which we agreed to issue and sell in a registered direct offering an aggregate of 3,157,895 shares of our common stock, withpar value $0.0001 per share, at an original exerciseoffering price of $15.60$4.75 per share, subject to adjustments (the “Series H-4 Warrants”). The purchase price per Series H-4 Share was $235.50, equal to (i)for gross proceeds of approximately $15.00 million before the closing pricededuction of the common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on March 7, 2018, plus $0.125 multiplied by (ii) 100. The aggregate purchase price for the Series H-4 Sharesfees and Series H-4 Warrants was approximately $6.0 million. Subject to certain ownership limitations, the Series H-4 Warrants are immediately exercisable will be exercisable for a period of five years from the issuance date. The Series H-4 Shares are convertible into aggregate of 447,383 shares of common stock.

offering expenses.

On March 8, 2018, we filed the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series H-4 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series H-4 Certificate of Designation”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, establishing and designating the rights, powers and preferences of the Series H-4 Shares. We designated up to 30,000 shares of Series H-4 Shares and each share has a stated value of $235.50 (the “H-4 Stated Value”). Each share of Series H-4 Shares is convertible at any time at the option of the holder thereof, into a number of shares of common stock determined by dividing the H-4 Stated Value by the conversion price of $14.13 per share, subject to a 9.99% blocker provision. The Series H-4 Shares have the same dividend rights as the common stock, and no voting rights except as provided for in the Series H-4 Certificate of Designation or as otherwise required by law. In the event of any liquidation or dissolution of the Company, the Series H-4 Shares rank senior to the common stock in the distribution of assets, to the extent legally available for distribution.


On March 26, 2019,July 21, 2020, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain existing investors, pursuant to which we sold, in a registered publicdirect offering by us directly to the investors, an aggregate of 478,4691,850,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, at an offering price of $4.18$5.00 per share for gross proceeds of $1,985,001 net$9.25 million before the deduction of fees and offering expensesexpenses. Each purchaser also had the right to purchase, on or before October 19, 2020, additional shares of $15,000.
common stock (the “Additional Shares”) equal to the full amount of 75% of the common stock it purchased at the initial closing, or an aggregate of 1,387,500 shares, at an offering price of $5.00 per share. On October 16, 2020, the Company entered into an addendum to the Agreement (the “Addendum”), which extended the deadline for each purchaser to exercise the right to purchase the Additional Shares by one year, to October 19, 2021. As of December 6, 2019,31, 2020, investors had elected to purchase 420,000 of the Additional Shares of common stock of AYRO, par value $0.0001 per share, at an offering price of $5.00 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $2.10 million before the deduction of fees and offering expenses. Between January 1, 2021 and March 30, 2021, investors had elected to purchase an additional 302,500 of the Additional Shares of common stock of AYRO, par value $0.0001 per share, at an offering price of $5.00 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $1.51 million before the deduction of fees and offering expenses.

On September 25, 2020, we entered into a Securities PurchaseMaster Manufacturing Services Agreement (the “Karma Agreement”) with Karma Automotive, LLC (“Karma”). The term of the contract is for 12 months. Pursuant to the agreement Karma will provide certain manufacturing services, starting in 2021, under an attached statement of work including final assembly, raw material storage and logistical support of our vehicles in return for compensation of $1.68 million. We paid Karma an amount of $0.52 million and issued warrants to an advisor to the transaction with a fair value of $0.07 million due at signing of the contract. The payment was recorded as prepaid expense as of December 31, 2020. Pursuant to the Karma Agreement, we paid cash of $0.08 and issued a warrant (the “September Warrants”) to purchase 31,348 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $3.19 per share to a vendor for facilitating a manufacturing agreement. The September Warrant is immediately exercisable and expires on September 25, 2025.

On November 22, 2020, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain institutional and accredited investors, pursuant to which we issuedagreed to the investorsissue and sell in a registered direct offering an aggregate of 34,722 Series H-5 Shares convertible into an aggregate of 3,472,2001,650,164 shares of our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, at an offering price of $6.06 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $10.0 million before the deduction of fees and warrantsoffering expenses of $0.85 million. Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to issue to the investors, unregistered Series A Warrants to purchase 3,472,200 shares of our common stock, with an exercise price of $0.792 per share, subjectup to adjustments. The purchase price per Series H-5 Share was $72.00, equal to (i) the closing price of the Common Stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on December 5, 2019, plus $0.125 multiplied by (ii) 100. The aggregate purchase price for the Series H-5 Shares and H-5 Warrants was approximately $2.5 million. Subject to certain ownership limitations, the H-5 Warrants will be exercisable beginning six months from the issuance date and will be exercisable for a period of five years from the initial exercise date. As described above under “Recent Developments – Exchange Agreements,” on February 5, 2020, we entered into Exchange Agreements with the holders of existing Series H-5 Shares to exchange an equivalent number of shares of our Series H-6 Shares. The Exchange closed on February 5, 2020.

Warrants
On the December 6, 2019, the Company issued warrants to purchase 3,715,254 shares of common stock of the Company, with an exercise price of $0.792 per share, subject to adjustments (the “H-5 Warrants”). Subject to certain ownership limitations, the H-5 Warrants will be exercisable beginning six months from the issuance date and will be exercisable for a period of five years from the initial exercise date.
The holders of the H-5 Warrants are entitled to certain anti-dilution adjustments if the Company issues shares of its common stock at a lower price per share than the applicable exercise price (subject to a floor of $0.1584 per share). The H-5 Warrants contain a blocker that prohibits the holder from exercising the warrants if such exercise will result in the beneficial ownership by the holder of more than 9.99% of the Company’s outstanding shares.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, we issued 277,778 shares of common stock upon the exercise of pre-funded Series K warrants (the “Series K Warrants”) and received aggregate proceeds of $16,667.
On April 19, 2018, we entered into separate Warrant Exchange Agreements (the “Warrant Exchange Agreements”) with the holders (the “Merger Warrant Holders”) of existing merger warrants (the “Merger Warrants”) to purchase shares of common stock, pursuant to which, on the closing date, the Merger Warrant Holders exchanged each Merger Warrant for 1/18 of a share of common stock and 1/12 of a warrant to purchase a share of common stock (collectively, the “Series I Warrants”). The Series I Warrants have an exercise price of $13.80 per share. In connection with the Warrant Exchange Agreements, we issued an aggregate of (i) 48,786 new1,237,624 shares of common stock and (ii)unregistered Series I Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 73,178 shares of common stock.
On August 31, 2018, we offered (the “Repricing Offer Letter”) to the holders (the “Holders”) of our outstanding Series H-4 Warrants to purchase common stock issued on March 8, 2018 (the “Series H-4 Warrants”) the opportunity to exercise such Series H-4 Warrants for cash at a reduced exercise price of $3.60 per share (the “Reduced Exercise Price”) provided such Series H-4 Warrants were exercised for cash on or before September 4, 2018 (the “End Date”). The Series H-4 Warrants contain anti-dilution price protection that was triggered upon the issuance of the Series H-5 Warrants, causing the exercise price to decrease from $3.60 per share to $3.12 per share. In addition, we issued a “reload” warrant (the “Series J Warrants”) to each Holder who exercised their Series H-4 Warrants prior to the End Date, covering one share for each Series H-4 Warrant exercised during that period. The terms of the Series J Warrants are substantially identical to the terms of the Series H-4 Warrants except that (i) the exercise price is equal to $6.00, (ii) the Series J Warrants may be exercised at all times beginning on the 6-month anniversary of the issuance date on a cash basis and also on a cashless basis, (iii) the Series J Warrants do not contain any provisions for anti-dilution adjustment and (iv) we have the right to require the Holders to exercise all or any portion of the Series J Warrants still unexercised for a cash exercise if the volume-weighted average (as defined in the Series J Warrant) for our common stock equals or exceeds $9.00 for not less than ten consecutive trading days.
On September 4, 2018, we received executed Repricing Offer Letters from a majority of the Holders, which resulted in the issuance of 260,116 shares of our common stock and Series JB Warrants to purchase up to 260,116825,084 shares of our common stock. We received gross proceedsThe Series A Warrants are exercisable immediately upon issuance and terminate six months following issuance and are exercisable at an exercise price of approximately $936,000 from the$8.09 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth therein. The Series B Warrants are exercisable immediately upon issuance and terminate five years following issuance and are exercisable at an exercise price of the Series H-4 Warrants pursuant$8.90 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth therein. Subject to certain limitations, we have a call right with respect to the terms of the Repricing Offer Letter.

warrants.

On September 5, 2018, we received a request from Nasdaq to amend our Series H-4 Warrants to provide that the Series H-4 Warrants may not be exercised until we have obtained stockholder approval of the issuance of common stock underlying the Series H-4 Warrants pursuant to the applicable rules and regulations of Nasdaq. In response to the request, on September 10, 2018, we entered into an amendment (the “Warrant Amendment”) with the holders of the Series H-4 Shares to provide for stockholder approval as described above prior to the exercise of the Series H-4 Warrants. We received stockholder approval of the issuance of common stock underlying the Series H-4 Shares on November 15, 2018.

On November 14, 2018,January 25, 2021, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreementsecurities purchase agreement with an existing investor,certain institutional and accredited investors, pursuant to which we issued,agreed to issue and sell in a registered direct offering an aggregate of 3,333,334 shares at an offering price of $6.00 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $20.0 million before the Series K Warrantsdeduction of fees and offering expenses. In a concurrent private placement, we sold to such investors warrants to purchase, 277,778at any time on or after July 26, 2021 and on or before July 26, 2023, additional shares of common stock in lieuequal to the full amount of the common stock it purchased at the initial closing, or an aggregate of 3,333,334 shares, at an exercise price of $6.93 per share.

Additionally, AYRO issued Palladium a warrant to purchase 233,334 shares of common stock because the purchase of common stock would have caused the beneficial ownership of the purchaser, together with its affiliates and certain related parties, to exceed 9.99% of our outstanding common stock.   The price to the purchaser for each Series K Warrant was $3.54 and the Series K Warrants are immediately exercisable at a price of $0.06 per share of common stock.  The Series K Warrants and shares of common stock for which they may be exercised were offered pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-227858).

Consulting Agreement, Related Parties
On July 11, 2018, we entered into a consulting agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) with Ascentaur, LLC (“Ascentaur”). Sebastian Giordano is the Chief Executive Officer of Ascentaur. Mr. Giordano has served on our board of directors since February 2013 and served as our Interim Chief Executive Officer from August 2013 through April 2016 and as our Chief Executive Officer from April 2016 through January 2018.
Pursuant to the terms of the Consulting Agreement, Ascentaur has agreed to provide advisory services with respect to our strategic development and growth, including advising us on market strategy and overall strategy, advising us on the sale of our WPCS International Incorporated (“WPCS”) business segment, providing assistance to us in identifying and recruiting prospective employees, customers, business partners, investors and advisors that offer desirable administrative, financing, investment, technical, marketing and/or strategic expertise, and performing such other services pertaining to our business as we and Ascentaur may from time to time mutually agree. As consideration for its services under the Consulting Agreement, Ascentaur is entitled to receive (i) a fee of $10,000 per month for a period of nine months from the effective date of the Consulting Agreement, (ii) a lump sum fee of $90,000 upon the closing of the sale of our WPCS business segment and (iii) reimbursement for reasonable and customary business expenses incurred in connection with Ascentaur’s performance under the Consulting Agreement. The term of the Consulting Agreement commenced on July 11, 2018 and will continue until April 9, 2019 or until terminated in accordance with the terms of the Consulting Agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded $33,733 as general and administrative related to the Consulting Agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2019, approximately $130,557 was paid in cash and $0 is recorded as accounts payable. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded $147,754 as general and administrative related to the Consulting Agreement. As of December 31, 2018, approximately $51,000 was paid in cash and approximately $97,000 was recorded as accounts payable. Of this amount, Ascentaur received $90,000 in relation to the sale of Suisun City Operations.
During 2018 and 2017, we entered into various financial transactions with Alpha Capital Anstalt, including the issuance of (i) $1,350,000 in convertible notes in 2017, (ii) 213,707 shares of common stock in connection with the WPCS Merger on January 30, 2018 for merger related services and cost of providing capital, (iii) 11,093 Series A Preferred Stock for $2,612,500 in the March 8, 2018 PIPE transaction, and (iv) 277,778 Series K prefunded common stock warrants on November 14, 2018 for proceeds of approximately $983,000.
Palladium Capital Advisors (“Palladium”) has provided investment banking services in connection with the WPCS Merger on January 30, 2018 and received 35,558 shares of common stock for merger related services, received 1,371 Series H-4 Shares and H-4 Warrants in the March 8, 2018 PIPE Transaction for advisory services, and in connection with the December 6, 2019 transaction received $200,000 and 243,054 H-5 Warrants.
On December 5, 2019, we entered into a placement agent and merger advisory agreement with Palladium whereby we shall pay to Palladium a cash fee equal to 8% of the aggregate gross proceeds raise in closing of each financing transaction and warrants to purchase that number of shares of our common stock equal to 7%(which equals 7.0% of the aggregate number of shares of common stock sold in each offering.the January 2021 registered direct offering). The warrants will be identical to any warrants issued to Palladium have the same terms as the warrants issued in January 2021.

On February 11, 2021, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain institutional and accredited investors, at such closing, provide forpursuant to which we agreed to issue and sell in a cashless exercise, haveregistered direct offering an exercise price equal to the offering price per share in the closing, and expire on the five year anniversary at such closing. In addition, we shall pay Palladium compensation for advisory services in connection with a possible business combination with an unaffiliated third party whereby we shall issue the numberaggregate of 4,400,001 shares of common stock at an offering price of $9.50 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $41.8 million before the post-merger entity immediately after the AYRO Merger that represents 2.5%deduction of the outstandingfees and offering expenses. Each purchaser was also granted an option to purchase, on or before February 16, 2022, additional shares of common stock equal to the full amount of 75% of the common stock it purchased at the initial closing, or an aggregate of 3,300,000 shares, at an exercise price of $11.50 per share.

Palladium and Spartan Capital Securities, LLC “Spartan,” or collectively with Palladium, the “Financial Advisors” are entitled to a fee equal to 8% of the gross proceeds raised in any surviving post-merger entity.


the February 2021 registered direct offering, or an aggregate of approximately $3.3 million, and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 271,158 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.925 per share and 35,885 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.45 per share. The warrants are exercisable immediately following issuance and terminate five years following issuance.

Factors Affecting Results of Operations

We have never been profitable and have incurred significant operating losses in each year since inception. Overall loss for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, were as follows:
 
 
Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
 
2019
 
 
2018
 
 
 
(in millions)
 
Continuing operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating expenses
 $2.5 
 $2.2 
  Operating loss
  (2.5)
  (2.2)
 
    
    
Interest expense
  - 
  (0.7)
 
    
    
Loss from continuing operations
  (2.5)
  (2.9)
 
    
    
Loss from operations of discontinued component
  (2.4)
  (11.7)
Loss on sale of component
  - 
  (4.2)
Consolidated net loss
  (4.9)
  (18.8)
  Deemed dividend on Series H-4 warrant and preferred stock modification
  (0.1)
  - 
  Deemed dividend on exchange of warrants
  - 
  (1.4)
Consolidated net loss attributable to common stockholders
 $(5.0)
 $(20.2)

Substantially all of our operating losses from continuing operations resulted from general and administrative costs associated with our continuing operations.Master Procurement Agreement General and administrative expenses consist primarily of costs associated with our overall operations and being a public company. These costs include personnel, legal and financial professional services, insurance, investor relations, and compliance related fees. As of December 31, 2019, we had a net working capital of approximately $2.4 million.

Components of Statements of Operations
General and Administrative.   General and administrative expenses consist primarily of public company expenses for administrative, human resources, legal, finance and accounting personnel, professional fees, insurance and other corporate expenses. We anticipate that we will incur additional personnel expenses, professional service fees, including audit and legal, investor relations, costs of compliance with securities laws and regulations, and higher director and officer insurance costs related to operating as a public company. As a result, we expect that our general and administrative expenses will continue to increase in the future.
Discontinued Operations
DropCar Operating
On December 19,

In March 2019, we entered into the Asset Purchase AgreementMPA with DropCar Operating, DC Partners, Spencer Richardson,Club Car. In partnership with Club Car and in interaction with its substantial dealer network, we have redirected our Co-Founderbusiness development resources towards supporting Club Car’s enterprise and Chief Executive Officer,fleet sales function as Club Car proceeds in its new product introduction initiatives.

COVID-19 Pandemic

Our business, results of operations and David Newman,financial condition have been adversely impacted by the recent coronavirus outbreak both in China and the United States. This has delayed our Co-Founderability to timely procure raw materials from our supplier in China, which in turn, has delayed shipments to and Chief Business Development Officer corresponding revenue from customers. The pandemic and social distancing directives have interfered with our ability, and the ability of our employees, workers, contractors, suppliers and other business partners to sell substantially allperform our and their respective responsibilities and obligations relative to the conduct of our business. The COVID-19 pandemic poses restrictions on our employees’ and other service providers’ ability to travel on pre-sales meetings, customers’ abilities to physically meet with our employees and the ability of our customers to test drive or purchase our vehicles and shutdowns that may be requested or mandated by governmental authorities, and we expect these restrictions to continue at least until the second quarter of 2021. The pandemic adversely impacted our sales and the demand for our products in 2020 and is expected to continue adversely impacting demand for our products in 2021.

AYRO 311

We previously manufactured and sold the AYRO 311 Autocycle, a compact, three-wheeled electric vehicle. As the AYRO 311 was nearing end-of-life, on August 17, 2020 we sold our remaining AYRO 311 Fleet inventory to a third party for $0.12 million (the “311 Fleet Sale”). Upon such sale, we sustained a loss on disposal of $0.28 million. Subsequent to the 311 Fleet Sale, on February 12, 2021, we entered into an agreement with Arcimoto, Inc. to settle certain patent infringement claims (the “Arcimoto Settlement”), pursuant to which we agreed to cease the production, importation and sale of the assetsAYRO 311, among other things. Accordingly, we would not be contractually permitted to resume production of the AYRO 311. We are continuing the development of an all-new, three-wheeled electric vehicle, which we intend to replace the AYRO 311 as our three-wheeled electric vehicle product offering. We expect to begin manufacturing our next generation three-wheeled vehicle in the first half of 2022.

Components of Statements of Operations

Revenue Recognition

We derive revenue from the sale of our three-and four-wheeled electric vehicles, and, to a lesser extent, shipping, parts and service fees. In the past we also derived rental revenue from vehicle revenue sharing agreements with our tourist destination fleet operators, or Destination Fleet Operators (“DFOs”), and, to a lesser extent, shipping, parts and service fees. Provided that all other revenue recognition criteria have been met, we typically recognize revenue upon shipment, as title and risk of loss are transferred to customers and channel partners at that time. Products are typically shipped to dealers or directly to end customers, or in some cases to our international distributors. These international distributors assist with import regulations, currency conversions and local language. Our vehicle product sales revenues vary from period to period based on, among other things, the customer orders received and our ability to produce and deliver the ordered products. Customers often specify requested delivery dates that coincide with their need for our vehicles.

Because these customers may use our products in connection with a variety of projects of different sizes and durations, a customer’s orders for one reporting period generally do not indicate a trend for future orders by that customer. Additionally, order patterns do not necessarily correlate amongst customers.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold primarily consists of costs of materials and personnel costs associated with the DropCar Operating business. Operating results for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 for the DropCar Operating business are presented as discontinuedmanufacturing operations, and an accrual for post-sale warranty claims. Personnel costs consist of wages and associated taxes and benefits. Cost of goods sold also includes freight and changes to our warranty reserves. Allocated overhead costs consist of certain facilities and utility costs. We expect cost of revenue to increase in absolute dollars, as product revenue increases.

Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses consist of general and administrative, sales and marketing and research and development expenses. Salaries and personnel-related costs, benefits, and stock-based compensation expense are the most significant components of each category of operating expenses. Operating expenses also include allocated overhead costs for facilities and utility costs.

Research and Development Expense

Research and development expense consists primarily of employee compensation and related expenses, prototype expenses, depreciation associated with assets acquired for research and liabilities classifieddevelopment, amortization of product development costs, product strategic advisory fees, third-party engineering and contractor support costs and allocated overhead. We expect our research and development expenses to increase in absolute dollars as heldwe continue to invest in new and existing products.

Sales and Marketing Expense

Sales and marketing expense consist primarily of employee compensation and related expenses, sales commissions, marketing programs, travel and entertainment expenses and allocated overhead. Marketing programs consist of advertising, tradeshows, events, corporate communications and brand-building activities. We expect sales and marketing expenses to increase in absolute dollars as we expand our sales force, expand our product lines, increase marketing resources, and further develop sales channels.

General and Administrative Expense

General and administrative expense consists primarily of employee compensation and related expenses for sale are presented separatelyadministrative functions including finance, legal, human resources and fees for third-party professional services, and allocated overhead. We expect our general and administrative expense to increase in absolute dollars as we continue to invest in growing our business.

Stock-based compensation

We account for stock-based compensation expense in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, which requires the balance sheet.


A breakdownmeasurement and recognition of compensation expense for share-based awards based on the discontinued operations is presented as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2019
 
 
2018
 
SERVICE REVENUES
 $4,579,745 
 $6,077,667 
COST OF REVENUE
  4,172,320 
  7,863,673 
GROSS PROFIT (LOSS)
  407,425 
  (1,786,006)
 
    
    
OPERATING EXPENSES
    
    
   Research and development
  205,000 
  322,269 
   General and administrative
  2,245,394 
  9,119,772 
   Depreciation and amortization
  395,081 
  354,657 
     TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
  2,845,475 
  9,796,698 
 
    
    
     OPERATING LOSS
  (2,438,050)
  (11,582,704)
 
    
    
Other income, net
  12,827 
  - 
Interest expense, net
  - 
  (409,082)
 
    
    
LOSS FROM DROPCAR DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
  (2,425,223)
  (11,991,786)
INCOME FROM SUISUN CITY DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
  - 
  315,119 
   LOSS FROM OPERATIONS OF DISCONTINUED COMPONENTS
  (2,425,223)
  (11,676,667)
LOSS ON SALE OF SUISUN CITY COMPONENT
  - 
  (4,169,718)
     LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
 $(2,425,223)
 $(15,846,385)
Assets and liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale included the following:
 
 
December 31,
 
 
 
2019
 
 
2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash
 $81,457 
 $415,569 
Accounts receivable, net
  210,671 
  295,626 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
  83,058 
  107,768 
     Current assets held for sale
 $375,186 
 $818,963 
 
    
    
Property and equipment, net
 $25,723 
 $39,821 
Capitalized software costs, net
  410,261 
  659,092 
Operating lease right-of-use asset
  1,886 
  - 
Other assets
  3,525 
  3,525 
     Noncurrent assets held for sale
 $441,395 
 $702,438 
 
    
    
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
  737,862 
  1,033,489 
Deferred revenue
  302,914 
  253,200 
Current liabilities held for sale
 $1,040,776 
 $1,286,689 

Suisun City Operations
On December 10, 2018, we signed a definitive agreement with a private corporation and completed the sale on December 24, 2018 of 100% of the Suisun City Operations, our wholly owned subsidiary, for a total cash consideration of $3.5 million. We recognized the following loss on sale of componentestimated fair value on the date of sale:


Sales price
$3,500,000
Commissions and various transaction costs
(332,220)
Net sales proceeds
3,167,780
Carrying amounts of assets, net of liabilities*
7,337,498
Loss on sale of Suisun City Operations
$(4,169,718)
* The carrying amounts of assets included cash of $1,504,366; accounts receivable and contract asset of $4,177,568; prepaid expenses and other current assets of $57,486; property and equipment of $295,206; intangibles and goodwill of $5,048,247; carrying amounts of liabilities included accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $3,688,831 and loans of $56,544.
The operations and cash flows of the Suisun City Operations were eliminated from ongoing operations following its sale. The operating results of the Suisun City Operations for the consolidated period between January 30, 2018 and December 24, 2018 were as follows:
Revenues
$13,730,252
Cost of revenues
10,836,754
Gross profit
2,893,498
Selling, general and administrative expenses
2,285,661
Depreciation and amortization
287,830
Total Operating Expenses
2,573,491
Interest expense, net
4,888
Net income from operations of discontinued component
$315,119
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of our financial statements and related disclosures requires us to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses and related disclosures. We believe that the estimates, assumptions and judgments involved in the accounting policies described below have the greatest potential impact on our financial statements and, therefore, we consider these to be our critical accounting policies. Accordingly, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions. See Note 3 to our audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 for information about these critical accounting policies, as well as a description of our other significant accounting policies.
Stock-based compensation
We account for all stock options using a fair value-based method. grant.

The fair value of each stock option granted to employees is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the related stock-based compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The fair value of the options granted to non-employees is measured and expensed as the options vest.

Comparison

Restricted stock grants are stock awards that entitle the holder to receive shares of Yearsour common stock as the award vests over time. The fair value of each restricted stock grant is based on the fair market value price of common stock on the date of grant, and it is measured and expensed as the options vest.

Other (Expense) Income

Other (expense) income consists of income received or expenses incurred for activities outside of our core business, including forgiveness of our PPP loan. Other expense consists primarily of interest expense, discount on debt amortization and the related loss on extinguishment of debt as it applies to the debt discount.

Provision for Income Taxes

Provision for income taxes consists of estimated income taxes due to the United States government and to the state tax authorities in jurisdictions in which we conduct business. In the case of a tax deferred asset, we reserve the entire value for future periods.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018– Continuing Operations

General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses2020 Compared with Year ended December 31, 2019.

The following table sets forth our results of operations for each of the periods set forth below:

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2020  2019  Change 
Revenue $1,604,069  $890,152  $713,917 
Cost of goods sold  1,770,552   691,843   1,078,709 
Gross (loss)/profit  (166,483)  198,309   (364,792)
Operating expenses:            
Research and development  1,920,548   714,281   1,206,267 
Sales and marketing  1,415,282   1,300,120   115,162 
General and administrative  6,603,935   6,678,310   (74,375)
Total operating expenses  9,939,765   8,692,711   1,247,054 
Loss from operations  (10,106,248)  (8,494,402)  (1,611,846)
Other income and expense:            
Other income  236,923   2,188   234,735 
Interest expense  (327,196)  (172,479)  (154,717)
Loss on extinguishment of debt  (566,925)  -   (566,925)
Net loss $(10,763,446) $(8,664,693) $(2,098,753)
Deemed dividend on modification of Series H-5 warrants  (432,727)  -   (432,727)
Net loss Attributable to Common Stockholders $(11,196,173) $(8,664,693) $(2,531,480)

Revenue

Revenue was $1.60 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 as compared to $0.89 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, totaled $2.5 million, an increase of $0.3 million, compared to $2.2 million recorded80.2%, or $0.71 million. The increase in revenue was the result of an increase in sales of our vehicles, deriving from our Master Agreement with Club Car, related powered-food box sales and other vehicle options for the year ended December 31, 2018. This was primarily attributable2020. Additionally, we recorded a one-time sale of the remaining vehicles, raw materials, and parts from our AYRO 311 product of $0.12 million. We also had revenue of $0.09 million from shipping and a de minimis amount for service revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020. As discussed under “Factors Affecting Results of Operations,” the COVID-19 pandemic adversely impacted sales and the demand for our vehicles during 2020.

Cost of goods sold and gross profit

Cost of goods sold increased by $1.08 million, or 155.9% for the year ended December 31, 2020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, due to an increase in vehicle sales and an increase in time-of order options for our vehicles and specialty products. Of this increase, $0.38 million was recorded for the one-time sale of $0.2the remaining vehicles, raw materials and parts from our AYRO 311 product line.

Gross margin percentage was (10.4)% for the year ended December 31, 2020 as compared to 22.3% for the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease in gross margin percentage in the core business was primarily due to an increase in tariffs on raw materials imported from China, an increase in shipping costs due to the global COVID-19 pandemic and an increase in overhead allocation resulting from the move to our new facility in January 2020. In 2020, we phased-out the production of our AYRO 311 line of vehicles in order to develop our next generation three-wheeled vehicle. The change in production did not represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on our operations or financial results. Our end-of-life product costs of the AYRO 311 decreased our gross profit margin by 16.6% for the year ended December 31, 2020. Vehicle prices increased in January 2021 to offset the standard cost increases.

Research and development expenses

Research and development expense was $1.92 million in stock-based compensation and $0.1for the year ended December 31, 2020 as compared to $0.71 million in other costs.


Interest Expense
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2019, totaled $0, a decreasean increase of $0.7$1.21 million, comparedor 168.9%. The increase was primarily due to $0.7research and development (“R&D”) expenses related to personnel costs for our engineering, design, and research teams as we expanded the suite of option packages for our vehicles and initiated development of our next-generation three-wheeled vehicle. We had an increase in salaries and related expenses of $0.56 million, recordedan increase of $0.46 million from R&D contracting for professional service and design costs and an increase in stock-based compensation of $0.11 million.

Sales and marketing expense

Sales and marketing expense increased by $0.12 million, or 8.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2018. This was primarily attributable to interest expense in relation2020, as compared to the Lock-Up Agreements recordedyear ended December 31, 2019, as we redirected our marketing focus in-house rather than outsourced contractors and marketing programs. Salaries and wages increased by $0.40 million and stock-based compensation increased by $0.11 million due to the addition of our Chief Marketing Officer and Chief of Business Development in late 2019 as well as the addition of other sales and marketing resources. Discretionary marketing programs decreased by $0.03 million and contracting for professional marketing services decreased by $0.47 million. These reductions in 2020 relative to 2019 were due to the redirection of our marketing focus in-house. Additionally, depreciation expense for demonstration vehicles assigned to the sales and marketing team increased by $0.12 million as compared to 2019 due to a reclassification from general and administration expenses to sales and marketing expense for demonstration vehicles assigned to the sales and marketing team.

General and administrative expenses

The majority of our operating losses from continuing operations resulted from general and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of costs associated with our overall operations and with being a public company. These costs include personnel, legal and financial professional services, insurance, investor relations, and compliance related fees. General and administrative expense was $6.60 million for the year ended December 31, 20182020, compared to $6.68 million for 2019, a decrease of $0.07 million. Contractor and consulting expenses decreased by $1.77 million. Contractor and consulting expenses for 2019 included $2.64 million of stock-based compensation paid to Christian Okonsky and Mark Adams, founders of AYRO and former board members and we also incurred an expense of $0.27 million for warrants issued for advisory services in 2019. Neither of these equity-related expenses were repeated in 2020. The reduction in contractor and consulting expenses was offset by an increase in contracting for professional services of $1.14 million, primarily a result of additional audit, legal and investor relations expenses incurred to support public reporting requirements. Board compensation expense increased by $0.22 million. Salaries and related costs increased by $0.17 million due to corporate expansion. Other public company-related expenses increased by $0.46 million. Stock-based compensation expense increased by $1.17 million, primarily due to the expense of director and employee equity awards in 2020. Depreciation decreased by $0.41 million, primarily driven by fully depreciating the tooling for our AYRO 311 product line during 2019 and the reclassification of the $0.12 million depreciation expense for demonstration vehicles assigned to the sales and marketing team due to our redirection of our marketing focus in-house.

Other income and expense

Other income increased by $0.23 million in 2020 compared to 2019. The increase was primarily due to the forgiveness of our Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loan in the amount of $0.7$0.22 million in principal and interest effective December 29, 2020. In addition, we received $0.02 million during 2020 as an incentive for hiring additional personnel in the city of Round Rock, Texas under the city’s standard economic development grant. Interest expense increased $0.15 million, for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to 2019, primarily due to the increase in the discount on debt recorded from the equity issuances associated with certain debt instruments issued prior to the Merger. Interest expense also included noncash amortization of warrant discounts issued in conjunction with certain debt offerings. A loss on the extinguishment of debt related to the early redemptions of a note in the principal amount of $0.14 million previously converted from a vendor payable was recorded for $0.02 million, a loss on the extinguishment of debt for a bridge note in the principal amount of $0.60 million was recorded for $0.35 million and a loss on the extinguishment of debt for a bridge note in the principal amount of $0.50 million was recorded for $0.19 million.

Non-GAAP Financial Measure

We present Adjusted EBITDA because we consider it to be an important supplemental measure of our operating performance, and we believe it may be used by certain investors as a measure of our operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as income (loss) from operations before interest income and expense, income taxes, depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, amortization of discount on debt, impairment of long-lived assets, stock-based compensation expense and certain non-recurring expenses.

Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP. Because of varying available valuation methodologies, subjective assumptions and the variety of equity instruments that can impact our non-cash operating expenses, we believe that providing a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes non-cash and non-recurring expenses allows for meaningful comparisons between our core business operating results and those of other companies, as well as providing us with an important tool for financial and operational decision making and for evaluating our own core business operating results over different periods of time.

Adjusted EBITDA may not provide information that is directly comparable to that provided by other companies in our industry, as other companies in our industry may calculate non-GAAP financial results differently, particularly related to non-recurring, unusual items. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to operating income or as an indication of operating performance or any other measure of performance derived in accordance with GAAP. We do not consider Adjusted EBITDA to be a substitute for, or superior to, the information provided by GAAP financial results.

Below is a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss to common stockholders:

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Net loss to common stockholders $(10,763,446) $(8,664,693)
Depreciation and amortization  447,283   722,566 
Stock-based compensation expense  1,827,008   3,336,394 
Amortization of discount on debt  236,398   152,243 
Interest expense  90,798   20,236 
Loss on extinguishment of debt  566,925    
Gain on debt forgiveness (PPP loan)  (219,363)   
Adjusted EBITDA $(7,814,397) $(4,433,254)

Liquidity and Capital Resources

For the years ended

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018,2020, we had net losses from continuing operations$36.54 million in cash and working capital of approximately $2.5 million and $2.9 million, respectively. At$38.50 million. As of December 31, 2019, we had an accumulated$0.64 million in cash and working capital deficit of $34.7$0.40 million. We anticipate that we will continueThe increase in cash and working capital was primarily a result of our capital raising activities from June 2020 through December of 2020 in addition to incur net losses intocash received as a result of the foreseeable futureMerger.

Our sources of cash since inception have been predominantly from the sale of equity and will need to raise additional capital to continue. At December 31,debt.

In October 2019, we raised $0.50 million in a 120-day short-term loan from Mark Adams, a former director of AYRO Operating and AYRO. This loan had casha 14% interest rate per annum, was payable quarterly and cash equivalentsan equity incentive of $4.3 million. At these capital levels, we believe we do not have sufficient funds143,795 shares of AYRO Operating common stock. In December 2019, this loan term was extended to continueApril 30, 2021 in exchange for the issuance of 136,340 shares of AYRO Operating common stock. The loan was repaid September 30, 2020.

In December 2019, a local marketing firm agreed to operate forconvert 90% of trade accounts payable the Company owed that firm to a 12 month period fromterm loan with a principal amount of $137,729.03 and bearing interest at the rate of 15% per annum, payable quarterly, with a maturity date of May 31, 2021. The Company also issued the financial statements includedmarketing firm 66,000 shares of common stock in conjunction with this Annual Reportterm loan. A discount on Form 10-K, by which point we will need to become profitable, improve cash flow from operations, begin selling propertydebt of $46,683 was recorded in the transaction and equipment, or complete a new capital raise. These factors raise substantial doubt aboutis being amortized over the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Our operations may be affected by the recent and ongoing outbreaklife of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) which in March 2020,debt. The loan was been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The ultimate disruption which may be caused by the outbreak is uncertain; however, it may result in a material adverse impact on our financial position, operations and cash flows. Possible areas that may be affected include, but are not limited to, disruption to our customers and revenue, labor workforce, and the decline in value of assets held by us, including, property and equipment and capitalized software.
On February 12, 2020, we received a notice from the New York State Department of Labor stating we have a negative balance in our experience rating account of approximately $165,000. The notice states we may make a voluntary payment of approximately $165,000. We do not expect to make this payment which will result in an increase to our future unemployment insurance rates. We will need to pay the max rate for a three-year period for not making the payment.
Our plans include raising funds from outside investors and consummating our merger with AYRO. However, there is no assurance that our merger with AYRO will be consummated, outside funding will be available to us, outside funding will be obtained on favorable terms or will provide us with sufficient capital to meet our objectives. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of assets, carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that may be required should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. As such, the consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the assumption the Company will continue as a Going Concern.
On March 26,repaid September 30, 2020.

In December 2019, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreementconvertible bridge loan with five institutional lenders totaling $1.0 million. On May 28, 2020, immediately prior to the closing of the Merger, the five lenders received warrants (the “Bridge Loan Warrants”) to purchase 1,030,585 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.1159 per share. The Bridge Loan Warrants had full ratchet anti-dilution price protection with respect to future issuances of securities at an effective price below the exercise price, with the exercise price per share reducing to such exercise price and the number of shares deliverable upon exercise of the warrants increasing such that the aggregate exercise price under each warrant remains constant. The Bridge Loan Warrants would have terminated after a period of five years on May 28, 2025. All Bridge Loan Warrants were exercised prior to December 31, 2020.

In February 2020, we entered into secured promissory notes with three institutional lenders totaling $0.50 million. On May 28, 2020, immediately after the closing of the Merger, pursuant to and in connection with the issuance of these notes, we issued warrants (the “Secured Loan Warrants”) to purchase an aggregate of 100,000 shares of common stock to the three lenders for an aggregate purchase price of $0.01 million. Proceeds from the Merger were used to fully repay the $0.50 million promissory note on May 28, 2020. The Secured Loan Warrants were exercised in full during the three months ended June 30, 2020.

In April 2020, the Company issued a secured promissory note payable to an individual investor providing $600,000 of short-term financing. The notes carried an interest rate of fifteen percent (15%) and were to be repaid upon the earlier of (1) closing date of the pending the Merger and (2) July 14, 2020. Fifty percent (50%) of the principal amount was personally guaranteed by Mark Adams, a former director of AYRO Operating and AYRO. In conjunction with the notes, 553,330 shares of common stock (276,665 shares of common stock representing two percent (2%) of the combined company’s post-merger outstanding common stock each) were issued to the lender and to Mr. Adams as compensation for his personal guarantee.

On May 28, 2020, we completed our reverse merger with DropCar, which resulted in cash received from the merger of $3.1 million, represented by 2,337,663 shares of common stock.

On May 28, 2020, we entered into the first AYRO Operating Private Placement SPA with current stockholders of the Company and AYRO Operating, pursuant to which such stockholders agreed to purchase, prior to the consummation of the Merger, shares of AYRO Operating Common Stock and warrants (the “First Private Placement Warrants”) to purchase AYRO Operating’s common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1.2 million. Prior to the closing of the Merger, AYRO Operating issued to the investors party to this first AYRO Private Placement SPA (i) an aggregate of approximately 543,179 shares of common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase 429,305 shares of Company Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.000367 per share, and (ii) First Private Placement Warrants to purchase 972,486 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.3599 per share. The First Private Placement Warrants issued pursuant to the first AYRO Operating Private Placement SPA had full ratchet anti-dilution price protection with respect to future issuances of securities at an effective price below the exercise price with the exercise price per share reducing to such exercise price and the number of shares deliverable upon exercise of the warrant increasing such that the aggregate exercise price under each warrant remains constant. The First Private Placement Warrants would have terminated after a period of five years on May 28, 2025. All First Private Placement Warrants were exercised prior to December 31, 2020.

On May 28, 2020, we entered into the second AYRO Operating Private Placement SPA with current investors of the Company and AYRO Operating, pursuant to which such investors agreed to purchase, prior to the consummation of the Merger, shares of AYRO Operating Common Stock and warrants (the “Second Private Placement Warrants”) to purchase AYRO Operating Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $0.85 million. On the closing date of the Merger, AYRO Operating issued to the investors party to this second AYRO Operating Private Placement SPA (i) an aggregate of approximately 1,030,039 shares of common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase 286,896 shares of Company Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.000367 per share, and (ii) Second Private Placement Warrants to purchase 1,316,936 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.7423 per share. The Second Private Placement Warrants issued pursuant to the second AYRO Operating Private Placement SPA had full ratchet anti-dilution price protection with respect to future issuances of securities at an effective price below the exercise price with the exercise price per share reducing to such exercise price and the number of shares deliverable upon exercise of the warrant increasing such that the aggregate exercise price under each warrant remains constant. The Second Private Placement Warrants would have terminated after a period of five years on May 28, 2025. All Second Private Placement Warrants were exercised prior to December 31, 2020.

In May 2020, the Company entered into a Paycheck Protection Program Term Note (the “PPP Note”) with Pacific Western Bank, NA in the amount of $218,000. The PPP Note was issued to the Company pursuant to the Coronavirus, Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act’s (the “CARES Act”) (P.L. 116-136) Paycheck Protection Program (the “Program”). The PPP Note carries a maturity date of May 20, 2022, at a 1% interest rate. On December 29, 2020, notice of the PPP Note forgiveness was granted to the Company. The forgiveness amount of $218,000 in principal and $1,363 in interest was recorded in the other income line item on the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020.

On June 17, 2020, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain existinginstitutional and accredited investors, pursuant to which we issuedagreed to the investorsissue and sell in a registered direct offering an aggregate of 478,4692,200,000 shares of common stock at an offering price of $4.18$2.50 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $2.0$5.50 million netbefore the deduction of fees and offering expenses of $15,000.

$0.44 million.

On DecemberJuly 6, 2019,2020, we entered into the a Securities Purchase Agreement,securities purchase agreement with certain institutional and accredited investors, pursuant to which we agreed to issue and sell in a registered direct offering an aggregate of 3,157,895 shares of our common stock at an offering price of $4.75 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $15.00 million before the deduction of fees and offering expenses of $1.25 million.

On July 21, 2020, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain existing investors, pursuant to which we sold, in a registered direct offering an aggregate of 1,850,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, at an offering price of $5.00 per share for gross proceeds of $9.25 million before offering expenses of $0.74 million. Each purchaser also had the right to purchase, on or before October 19, 2020, additional shares of common stock (the “Additional Shares”) equal to the full amount of 75% of the common stock it purchased at the initial closing, or an aggregate of 1,387,500 shares, at price of $5.00 per share. On October 16, 2020, we entered into an addendum to the Agreement (the “Addendum”), which extended the deadline for each purchaser to exercise the right to purchase the Additional Shares by one year, to October 19, 2021. As of December 31, 2020, investors had elected to purchase 420,000 of the Additional Shares of common stock of AYRO, par value $0.0001 per share, at an offering price of $5.00 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $2.10 million before offering expenses of $0.17 million. Between January 1, 2021 and March 30, 2021, investors had elected to purchase an additional 302,500 of the Additional Shares of common stock of AYRO, par value $0.0001 per share, at an offering price of $5.00 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $1.51 million before the deduction of fees and offering expenses.

On November 22, 2020, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain institutional and accredited investors, pursuant to which we agreed to issue and sell in a registered direct offering an aggregate of 1,650,164 shares of our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, at an offering price of $6.06 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $10.00 million before the deduction of fees and offering expenses of $0.85 million. Pursuant to the securities purchase agreement, we issued to the investors unregistered Series A Warrants to purchase up to 1,237,624 shares of common stock and unregistered Series B Warrants to purchase up to 825,084 shares of common stock. The Series A Warrants are exercisable immediately upon issuance and terminate six months following issuance and are exercisable at an exercise price of $8.09 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth therein. The Series B Warrants are exercisable immediately upon issuance and terminate five years following issuance and are exercisable at an exercise price of $8.90 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth therein. In addition, subject to certain limitations, we have a call right with respect to the warrants.

On January 25, 2021, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain institutional and accredited investors, pursuant to which we agreed to issue and sell in a registered direct offering an aggregate of 34,7223,333,334 shares at an offering price of $6.00 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $20.00 million before the deduction of fees and offering expenses. In a concurrent private placement, we sold to such investors warrants to purchase, at any time on or after July 26, 2021 and on or before July 26, 2023, additional shares of common stock equal to the full amount of the common stock it purchased at the initial closing, or an aggregate of 3,333,334 shares, at an exercise price of $6.93 per share.

On February 11, 2021, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain institutional and accredited investors, pursuant to which we agreed to issue and sell in a registered direct offering an aggregate of 4,400,001 shares of common stock at an offering price of $9.50 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $41.8 million before the deduction of fees and offering expenses. Each purchaser was also granted the option to purchase, on or before February 16, 2022, additional shares of common stock equal to the full amount of 75% of the common stock it purchased at the initial closing, or an aggregate of 3,300,000 shares, at a purchase price of $11.50 per share.

Between May 28, 2020 (the Merger closing) and December 31, 2020, holders of warrants have exercised warrants to purchase an aggregate of 5,074,645 shares of our Series H-5 Sharescommon stock for aggregate net proceeds to us of $3.93 million. This is inclusive of warrants exercised as noted above.

Our business is capital intensive, and future capital requirements will depend on many factors including our growth rate, the timing and extent of spending to support development efforts, the expansion of our sales and marketing teams, the timing of new product introductions and the Series H-5 Warrants. continuing market acceptance of our products and services. We may also use capital for strategic acquisitions or transactions. We are subject to a number of risks similar to those of earlier stage commercial companies, including dependence on key individuals and products, the difficulties inherent in the development of a commercial market, the potential need to obtain additional capital, competition from larger companies, other technology companies and other technologies. Based on the foregoing, management believes that the existing cash at December 31, 2020, together with net proceeds of approximately $56.8 million raised through registered direct offerings in January 2021 and February 2021, will be sufficient to fund operations for at least the next twelve months following the date of this report.

Summary of Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our cash flows:

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Cash Flows:        
Net cash used in operating activities $(10,019,344) $(4,104,286)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities $2,542,020  $(374,352)
Net cash provided by financing activities $43,372,599  $5,081,217 

Operating Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we used $10.02 million in cash in operating activities, an increase in use of $5.92 million when compared to the cash used in operating activities of $4.10 million during the same period in 2019. The increase in cash used in operating activities was primarily a result of prepayments for inventory and manufacturing services, an increase in accounts receivable, payments of accrued expenses, purchases of inventory and an increase in our operating loss as we continue to build our core business. This was offset by a reduction in cash used from our payments of outstanding accounts payable to Cenntro in March 2019 that did not occur in 2020.

Our ability to generate cash from operations in future periods will depend in large part on profitability, the rate and timing of collections of our accounts receivable, inventory turns and our ability to manage other areas of working capital.

Investing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we were provided cash of $2.54 million from investing activities as compared to $0.37 million cash used in investing activities during 2019, an increase of $2.91 million. The net increase was primarily due to proceeds of $3.06 million from the Merger.

Financing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we received net proceeds of an aggregate purchase price forof $39.86 million from the Series H-5 Shares and H-5 Warrants was approximately $2.3 million,issuance of common stock, net of offeringfees and expenses, $0.02 million from the exercise of $200,000.

options to purchase additional shares of common stock, and $3.93 million from the exercise of warrants for cash. In addition, during 2020, we received $0.50 million of debt financing from certain DropCar investors and $0.60 million of debt financing from a private investor, both of which notes were repaid upon closing of the Merger. Additionally, in May 2020, we received $0.22 million in a PPP loan from our bank, which was forgiven in December 2020. In December 2020, we were notified that the PPP loan principal and accrued interest were forgiven in full under the PPP terms, which is reflected in the non-cash section of cash flows from operating activities. The debt proceeds were netted with $1.74 million of loan repayments. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we issued 277,778 shares$2.52 million was generated through the sale of AYRO Operating’s Preferred Stock. Additionally, during 2019 $0.80 million in proceeds were received from the sale of promissory notes convertible into AYRO Operating’s Series Seed 2 Preferred Stock, $0.33 million in proceeds were received from the sale of promissory term notes, $0.50 million in proceeds were received from the sale of a promissory note to Mark Adams, a former AYRO board member, $1.00 million in proceeds were received from the sale of promissory notes from certain DropCar investors, convertible into the Company’s common stock upon the exerciseMerger, and a short-term loan of Series K Warrants$0.05 million was received and received aggregate proceedsrepaid in the first quarter of $16,667.
Our independent registered public accounting firm included2019, netted with $0.12 million of repayment of loan principal. No warrants were exercised in 2019.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

We have made certain indemnities, under which we may be required to make payments to an explanatory paragraph aboutindemnified party, in relation to certain transactions. We indemnify our directors and officers to the existencemaximum extent permitted under the laws of substantial doubt concerningthe State of Delaware. In connection with our abilityfacility leases, we have indemnified our lessors for certain claims arising from the use of the facilities. The duration of the indemnities vary and, in many cases, are indefinite. These indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments we could be obligated to continuemake. Historically, we have not been obligated to make any payments for these obligations and no liabilities have been recorded for these indemnities.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Other than business and certain indemnification provisions, we do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements or liabilities, guarantee contracts, retained or contingent interests in transferred assets, or any obligation arising out of a material variable interest in an unconsolidated entity. Other than AYRO Operating Company, Inc. and DropCar Operating Company, Inc., we do not have any subsidiaries to include or otherwise consolidate into the consolidated financial statements. Additionally, we do not have interests in, nor relationships with, any special purpose entities.

Related Party Transactions

Supply Chain Agreements

In 2017, we executed a supply chain contract with Cenntro Automotive Group (“Cenntro”), our primary supplier, a manufacturer located in the People’s Republic of China. Through our partnership with Cenntro, Cenntro acquired 19% of AYRO Operating’s common stock in 2017. As of December 31, 2020, Cenntro beneficially owned approximately 4.38% of our common stock. Currently, we purchase 100% of our vehicle chassis, cabs and wheels through this supply chain relationship with Cenntro. We must sell a minimum number of units in order to maintain our exclusive supply chain contract. We were in default of the original exclusive term of the contract; however, in 2019 and 2020, the contract was amended to remove the default clause. In December 2019, Cenntro agreed to convert $1.10 million of trade accounts payable due from us to 299,948 shares of AYRO Operating’s Seed Preferred Stock. The parties also agreed that any accrued interest on the trades payable as a going concernresult of this conversion would be forgiven, which resulted in its report on our financial statements asa recapture of and forinterest expense in the amount of $0.17 million in the year ended December 31, 2019. Note 2As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the amounts outstanding to Cenntro as a component of accounts payable were $0.05 million and $0.08 million, respectively. Under a memorandum of understanding signed between us and Cenntro on March 22, 2020, upon availability of the 411x product, we agreed to purchase 300 units within the twelve months following the signing of the memorandum of understanding, and 500 units and 800 units in each of the following respective twelve-month periods. On July 9, 2020, in exchange for certain percentage discounts for raw materials, we made a $1.2 million prepayment for inventory. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the prepayment deposits were $0.98 million and $0.05 million.

In October 2019, we borrowed $0.50 million under a bridge loan from Mark Adams, a founding board member. As an inducement for the bridge loan, we granted Mr. Adams 143,975 shares of common stock and in December 2019, the Company granted an additional 136,340 shares of common stock to Mr. Adams as consideration for extending the term date of the loan to April 30, 2021. In September 2020, the loan principal and accrued interest were paid in full.

On March 1, 2017, we entered into a royalty-based agreement with Sustainability Initiatives, LLC (“SI”) an entity that is controlled by Mark Adams, a former director of AYRO and AYRO Operating, and Christian Okonsky, a former director of AYRO Operating in the effort to accelerate our financialoperations. Royalties accrued were included as a component of research and development expense in the accompanying consolidated statements includes management’s discussion onof operations. In return for acceleration assistance and for serving as our abilityChief Visionary Officer, the agreement provided for a monthly retainer. On a quarterly basis, we remitted a royalty of a percentage (see table below) of company revenues less the retainer amounts.

RevenuesRoyalty Percentage
$0 - $25,000,0003.0%
$25,000,000 - $50,000,0002.0%
$50,000,000 - $100,000,0001.0%
Over $100,000,0010.5%

Effective January 1, 2019, we agreed to fulfill our obligations as dependent upon our abilityan amendment with SI to raisereduce the royalty percentage to 0.5%. In relation to this amendment, we granted the SI members an additional financing.

Our future capital requirements381,752 stock options to vest over a nine-month vesting term. On October 15, 2019, we and the periodSI members agreed to terminate the agreement in full in exchange for which231,778 shares of the Company’s common stock. Stock-based compensation of $0.91 million was recorded on the transaction in October 2019.

On December 9, 2019, we expect our existing resourcesand the SI members agreed to support our operations may vary significantly from what we currently expect. Our monthly spending levels vary based on new and ongoing technology developments and corporate activities.

We have historically financed our activities throughcancel the saleoutstanding options to purchase 477,190 shares of our equity securities (including convertible preferred stock)common stock in exchange for 434,529 shares of our common stock. Stock-based compensation of $1.50 million was recorded for the transaction in December 2019.

On April 1, 2017, we entered into a fee-for-service agreement with SI. In return for accounting, marketing, graphics and other services, we pay fixed, market-standard hourly rates under the issuanceshared services agreement as services are rendered. As of convertible notes. We will needDecember 31, 2020 and 2019, we had a balance outstanding to raise significant additional capitalSI for $0.01 million for both periods included in accounts payable. Total expenses paid or payable to SI were $0 and $0.06 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

In January 2019, we plan to continue to fund our current operations,entered into a fee-for-service consulting agreement with Sustainability Consultants, LLC, (“SCLLC”) an entity that is controlled by Mark Adams, Will Steakley and the associated losses from continuing operations, through future issuancesJohn Constantine, who were principal stockholders of debt and/or equity securities and potential collaborations or strategic partnerships with other entities. The capital raises from issuances of convertible debt and equity securities could resultAYRO Operating. In exchange for consulting services provided, we paid $0.19 million in additional dilution to our stockholders. In addition,consulting fees to the extent we determine to incur additional indebtedness, our incurrence of additional debt could result in debt service obligations and operating and financing covenants that would restrict our operations. We can provide no assurance that financing will be available in the amounts we need or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If we are not able to secure adequate additional working capital when it becomes needed, we may be required to make reductions in spending, extend payment terms with suppliers, liquidate assets where possible and/or suspend or curtail operations. Any of these actions could materially harm our business.


Cash Flows
Operating Activities – Continuing Operations
We have historically experienced negative cash outflows. Our primary uses of cash from operating activities are the costs associated with continuing as a public company.
Net cash used in operating activities forfirm during the year ended December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2020, the balance due to SCLLC is zero. Additionally, we granted warrants to purchase 177,924 shares of our common stock. The warrants have an exercise price of $7.33 per share with a five-year life. Stock-based compensation consulting expense of $0.27 million was recorded in the general and administrative expenses on the statement of operations in the fourth quarter of 2019 was approximately $2.1 million, which includes a net loss from continuing operationsin conjunction with the warrant grant – see Note 11 - Stock Based Compensation, of approximately $2.5 million, offset by non-cash expensesthe Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We also granted 67,488 shares of approximately $0.3 million related toour common stock and recorded stock-based compensation expense,of $0.23 million in the general and approximately $0.1 millionadministrative expenses on the statement of cash provided by a change in net working capital items principallyoperations for the fourth quarter of 2019 related to the decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets. 
Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 was approximately $1.1 million, which includes a net loss from continuing operations of approximately $2.9 million, offset by non-cash expenses of approximately $0.8 million principally related to $0.7 million of non-cash interest expense, and approximately $1.1 million of cash provided from a change in net working capital items principally related to $1.3 million for the increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses, partially offset by $0.2 million of cash used from the increase in prepaid expenses and other assets.
Investing Activities – Continuing Operations
There were no cash flows from investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 of approximately $7.0 primarily resulted from cash received upon acquisition of $5.0 million and proceeds from sale of components, net of cash relinquished of approximately $2.0 million.
Financing Activities – Continuing Operations
Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 totaled approximately $4.1 million, primarily resulting from proceeds of $2.0 million from the sale of the common stock transaction.

Critical Accounting Policies and net proceedsEstimates

Our management’s discussion and analysis of $2.3 million from the saleour financial condition and results of Series H-5 Shares and Series H-5 Warrants, partially offset by excess tax benefits paid of approximately $0.2 million.

Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled approximately $8.1 million, primarily resulting from proceeds of $6.0 million from the sale of the Series H-4 Shares and Series H-4 Warrants, $0.9 million from the issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of Series H-4 Warrants, $0.3 million from the sale of common stock and $1.0 million for the sale of Series K Warrants, offset by financing costs related to the Series H-4 Shares and Series H-4 Warrants of approximately $0.1 million.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We did not engage in any “off-balance sheet arrangements” (as that termoperations is defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K) and do not have any holdings in variable interest entities as of December 31, 2019.
ITEM 7A – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, and are not required to provide the information required under this item.
ITEM 8 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Our auditedbased on our consolidated financial statements, aswhich have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures requires us to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses and related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared. Accordingly, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.

Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 and 2018which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We believe that the following accounting estimates are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results. There have been no changes to estimates during the periods presented in the filing. Historically, changes in management estimates have not been material.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements, in conformity with GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Our most significant estimates include allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation of inventory reserve, valuation of deferred tax asset allowance, and the measurement of stock-based compensation expenses. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Reclassification 

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial statements to conform to the current period financial statement presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net earnings or cash flows as previously reported.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, the core principle of which is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this core principle, five basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) identify the contract with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when or as we satisfy a performance obligation.

Warrants and Preferred Shares

We account for warrants issued for performance of services under fair value recognition provisions. We calculate the fair value of the warrant utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing based upon the estimated fair value of the underlying common stock.

The accounting treatment of warrants and preferred share series issued is determined pursuant to the guidance provided by ASC 470, Debt, ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, as applicable. Each feature of a freestanding financial instruments including, without limitation, any rights relating to subsequent dilutive issuances, dividend issuances, equity sales, rights offerings, forced conversions, optional redemptions, automatic monthly conversions, dividends and exercise are assessed with determinations made regarding the proper classification in the consolidated financial statements.

Stock-Based Compensation

We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). Under the fair value recognition provisions, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, based on the terms of the awards. We calculate the fair value of option grants utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing model based upon the estimated fair value of the common stock.

In June 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2018-07”). ASU 2018-07 expands the guidance in ASC 718 to include share-based payments for goods and services to non-employees and generally aligns it with the guidance for share-based payments to employees. In accordance with ASU 2018-07, these stock options and warrants issued as compensation for services provided to us are accounted for based upon the fair value of the underlying equity instrument. The attribution of the fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense over the period during which services are rendered.

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

Basic and diluted net loss per share is determined by dividing net loss by the weighted average ordinary shares outstanding during the period. For all periods presented with a net loss, the shares underlying the ordinary share options and warrants have been excluded from the calculation because their effect would be anti-dilutive. Therefore, the weighted-average shares outstanding used to calculate both basic and diluted loss per share are the same for periods with a net loss.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

The information required by this Item 8 is included at the end of this Annual Report on Form 10-K beginning on Page F-1 immediately following the signature page to this report. See Item 15 for a list of the financial statements included herein.


F-1.

ITEM 9 – CHANGES9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSUREDISCLOSURE.

None.

Not applicable.

ITEM 9A – CONTROLSCONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation

Our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Under the supervision and with the participation of disclosure controlsmanagement, including our principal executive and procedures.

The Company maintainsprincipal financial officers, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2020. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) ofunder the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in ourthe reports filedthat it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SECthe SEC’s rules and formsforms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that such information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that we file or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to ourthe company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO")its principal executive and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"),principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management includingnecessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the CEOcost-benefit relationship of possible controls and CFO, evaluatedprocedures. Based on the design and operationevaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of December 31, 2019. Based on2020, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such evaluation,date, our CEO and CFO concluded the disclosure controls and procedures were not effectiveineffective due to the material weaknessesweakness in internal control over financial reporting described below.
(b) Management’s report ondiscussed below, as well as our continued implementation of disclosure controls and procedures following the Merger. As a result of the Merger, management has evaluated our internal control overprocesses, has made improvements in our processes and is continually evaluating and improving our internal control processes and expanding our financial reporting.
operations and reporting infrastructure.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting asis defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting isAct as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP").

Management’s internal control over financial reportingand includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
that:

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of our management and directors; and

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. Also, projectionsmisstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the riskrisks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies andor procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management conducted an evaluationIn its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financialfinancing reporting as of December 31, 2019 based on2020, management identified a material weakness related to segregation of duties. Specifically, due to limited resources and headcount we did not have multiple people in the criteria set forth in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committeeaccounting function for a full segregation of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"). duties.

Based on management’sthis assessment, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officermanagement concluded that the Companywe did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 as a result of the material weaknesses described below:

A. 
Control environment, control activities and monitoring:

The Company did not design and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting related to control environment, control activities and monitoring2020, based on the criteria established in the COSOInternal Control – Integrated Framework including more specifically:
● 
Competency(2013).

Plan for Remediation of resources: Management did not effectively execute a strategyMaterial Weakness

We have taken and continue to hire, train and retain a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of training, knowledge and experience in certain areas importanttake remedial steps to financial reporting; and

● 
Deployment and oversight of control activities: Management did not implement effective oversight to support deployment of control activities due to (a) failure to establish clear accountability for the performance of internal control over financial reporting responsibilities in certain areas important to financial reporting and (b) a limited segregation of duties amongst Company employees with respect to the Company’s control activities, primarily as a result of the Company’s limited number of employees.
B. 
Review of the Financial Reporting Process:
The Company did perform an adequate review of the financial reporting process (i.e., untimely accounting for certain significant transactions, inadequate review of journal entries, and financial statements and related footnotes) which resulted in material corrected misstatements and disclosure adjustments.

This annual report does not include an attestation report by Friedman LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, regarding internal control over financial reporting. As a smaller reporting company, our management's report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management's report in this Annual Report.
(c) Changes in internal control over financial reporting.
Our remediation efforts were ongoing during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. Other than the remediation steps described above, there were no other material changes inimprove our internal control over financial reporting identifiedby hiring additional personnel with added expertise in management’s evaluationpublic company reporting and expect to conclude that the material weakness has been remediated as these individuals progress through the onboarding process.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required under this item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement pursuant to Rules 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d)Regulation 14A, which proxy statement will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the close of the Exchange Act during theour fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


ITEM 9B – 2020.OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEM 10 – DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K andif the Company’s definitive proxy statement is not filed within such time.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required under this item is incorporated herein by reference in this report.

ITEM 11 – to our definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A, which proxy statement will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the close of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K andif the Company’s definitive proxy statement is incorporated by reference in this report.
not filed within such time.

ITEM 12 – SECURITY12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required under this item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A, which proxy statement will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the close of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K andif the Company’s definitive proxy statement is incorporated by reference in this report.

not filed within such time.

ITEM 13 – CERTAIN 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required under this item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A, which proxy statement will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the close of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K andif the Company’s definitive proxy statement is incorporated by reference in this report.not filed within such time.

ITEM 14 –14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTINGACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required under this item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A, which proxy statement will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the close of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K andif the Company’s definitive proxy statement is incorporated by reference in this report.

not filed within such time.

PART IV

ITEM 15 – EXHIBITS,15. EXHIBITS, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULESSCHEDULES.

(a). The following documents are filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K:

(a)(1) and (2). See “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules” at Item 8 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other financial10-K:

(1) Financial Statements:

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmsF-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-7

(2) Financial Statement Schedules:

None. Financial statement schedules have not been included because they are not applicable, or the information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.


(a)

(3) Exhibits

The following isExhibits:

See “Index to Exhibits” for a listdescription of exhibits filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

our exhibits.

Item 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

Not applicable

Exhibit

No.

 
NumberDescription
   
 
Form of Support Agreement, dated as of September 6, 2017, by and between the Company and certain stockholders named therein (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.22.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission on December 6, 2017).
20, 2019)
   
2.2 
2.3Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement, by and among DropCar, Inc., DropCar Operating Company, Inc., DC Partners Acquisition, LLC, Spencer Richardson and David Newman, dated May 28, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission on December 6, 2017).May 29, 2020)
   
3.1 May 29, 2020)
   
3.2 
   
3.3 
   
3.4 
   
3.5 
   
4.1 August 14, 2020)
   
4.2 AmendedForm of Spartan Capital Securities, LLC Finder’s Warrant issued in connection with the June 2020 Registered Direct Offering (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company,Exchange Commission on August 14, 2020)
   
4.3 AmendedPalladium Holdings, LLC Advisor’s Warrant issued in connection with the July 2020 Registered Direct Offering (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant.Exchange Commission on August 14, 2020)
4.4 
Form of Series K Common Stock PurchaseSpartan Capital Securities, LLC Advisor’s Warrant (incorporatedissued in connection with the July 2020 Registered Direct Offering (incorporated by reference fromto Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission on NovemberAugust 14, 2018).2020)

4.5Palladium Holdings, LLC Advisor’s Warrant issued in connection with the July 23, 2020 Registered Direct Offering (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2020)
   
4.6 
   
4.7 

 
4.8Form of Warrant issued in connection with the $1.15M AYRO Private Placement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2020)
4.9Form of Warrant issued in connection with the AYRO Bridge Loan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2020)
4.10Form of Penny Warrant issued in connection with the Secured Loan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2020)
4.11Form of Series IA Warrant to Purchase Common Stock (incorporated(incorporated by reference fromto Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission on April 20, 2018).November 23, 2020)
   
4.12 
Form of Warrant4.2 to Purchase Common Stock (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission on April 4, 2017November 23, 2020)).
   
4.13 
   
4.14 
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 10, 2018, between DropCar, Inc. and World Professional Cabling Systems, LLC (incorporatedJanuary 2020 Offering (incorporated by reference fromto Exhibit 10.1 of4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission on December 14, 2018January 26, 2021)).
4.15Form of Placement Agent Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued in connection with the February 2021 Offering (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 16, 2021)
   
4.16** 
10.1Mark Adams Secured Promissory Note, dated as of NovemberOctober 14, 2018, between DropCar,2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 29, 2020)
10.2Amendment to Mark Adams Secured Promissory Note, dated December 31, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 29, 2020)
10.3April Bridge Financing, by and among AYRO Operating Company, Inc. and Alpha Capital Anstalt (incorporatedthe lenders party thereto, dated April 14, 2020 (incorporated by reference fromto Exhibit 10.210.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 29, 2020)
10.4Form of Bridge Loan Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 28, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 29, 2020)
10.5Form of AYRO Operating Private Placement Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 28, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 29, 2020)
10.6Employment Agreement, by and between the Company and Rodney Keller, dated May 28, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 29, 2020)
10.7Employment Agreement, by and between AYRO Operating Company, Inc. and Curtis Smith, dated March 8, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission on NovemberAugust 14, 2018).2020)
   
10.8 
Registration Rights Agreement, dated December 21, 2016, by and among WPCS International Incorporated and the investors listed therein (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 of10.7 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2016May 29, 2020)).
   
10.9 
10.10Form of ISO Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission on April 4, 2017May 29, 2020)).
   
10.11 
   
10.12 
   
10.13 

 
10.14SeparationForm of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated January 30, 2018,July 6, 2020, by and betweenamong the Company and Sebastian Giordano (incorporatedthe purchasers thereto (incorporated by reference fromto Exhibit 10.2 of10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission on February 5, 2018July 8, 2020)).
   
10.15 
Employment Agreement, by and between the Company and Spencer Richardson, dated as of September 6, 2017 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 of10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission on February 5, 2018July 23, 2020)).
   
10.16+ 
10.17AYRO Operating, Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2020)
10.18Form of NQSO Award Agreement under the AYRO Operating, Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2020)
10.19Advisory Agreement, dated January 1, 2019, by and among the Company and Sustainability Consultants, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2020)
10.21Form of Addendum to the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated October 16, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission on February 5, 2018October 16, 2020)).
   
10.22† 
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated March 8, 2018, between the Company and the purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 ofto the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 2018October 1, 2020)).
   
10.23 
   
Form of Warrant Exchange Agreement (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 20, 2018).
10.24† Consulting Agreement,First Amendment to the AYRO, Inc. 2020 Long-Term Incentive Plan, dated as of July 11, 2018, by and between the Company and Ascentaur, LLC (incorporatedDecember 17, 2020 (incorporated by reference fromto Exhibit 10.1 ofto the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission on July 13, 2018).December 22, 2020)
   
10.25 
   
10.26 
   
23.1** 
   
10.2123.2**
 

Letter from EisnerAmper, dated July 8, 2019 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 16.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 10, 2019).
   
21.131.1**
*
 


Consent EisnerAmper LLP


ConsentPrincipal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Friedman LLP
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
31.131.2**
*
 Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of the Principal ExecutiveFinancial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
31.232.1**
*
 Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial And Accounting Officer
Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer (This certificationpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101 INS**XBRL Instance Document
101 SCH**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101 CAL**XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document
101 DEF**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101 LAB**XBRL Taxonomy Labels Linkbase Document
101 PRE**XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document

**Filed herewith.
***Furnished herewith.
+Certain portions of this exhibit have been redacted pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iv) of Regulation S-K. The omitted information is being furnished(i) not material and shall not be deemed “filed” with(ii) would likely cause competitive harm to the Company if publicly disclosed. The Company agrees to furnish supplementally an unredacted copy of the exhibit to the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act,upon its request.
Management or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actcompensatory plan or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference).arrangement.
* Filed herewith.
† Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

ITEM 16 – SUMMARYSIGNATURES

None.
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

authorized.

 DROPCAR,AYRO, INC.
   
Date: Dated: March 30 , 2020
31, 2021
By:
/s/ Spencer Richardson Rodney C. Keller, Jr.
  Spencer Richardson Rodney C. Keller, Jr,
  
President, Chief Executive Officer,
and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Spencer Richardson and Joshua Silverman (with full power to act alone), as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full powers of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitute or substitutes, lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

indicated below.

SignatureName Title Date
     
/s/ Spencer RichardsonRodney C. Keller, Jr.
 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

 March 30, 202031, 2021
Spencer RichardsonRodney C. Keller, Jr. (Principal Executive Officer)  
     
/s/ Mark CorraoCurtis Smith
 

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 March 30, 202031, 2021
Mark CorraoCurtis Smith (Principal Financial Officer; Principal Accounting Officer)  
     
/s/ Joshua Silverman
 Chairman of the Board of Directors March 30, 202031, 2021
Joshua Silverman    
     
/s/ Sebastian Giordanos George Devlin
Sebastian Giordano Director March 30, 202031, 2021
George Devlin
     
/s/ David NewmanSebastian Giordano
DirectorMarch 31, 2021
Sebastian Giordano    
David NewmanDirector, Chief Business Development OfficerMarch 30, 2020
     
/s/ Zvi Joseph
Zvi Joseph Director March 30, 202031, 2021
Zvi Joseph
     
/s/ Solomon MayerGreg Schiffman
Solomon Mayer Director March 30, 202031, 2021
Greg Schiffman
     
/s/ Greg SchiffmanWayne R. WalkerDirectorMarch 31, 2021
Wayne R. Walker    
Greg SchiffmanDirectorMarch 30, 2020

INDEX TO

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Table of Contents

Page
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmsF-2
F-1
  
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20192020 and 20182019F-4F-3
  
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 20182019F-5F-4
  
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 20182019F-6F-5
  
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 20182019F-7F-6
  
Notes to consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial StatementsF-8F-7

 

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

 DropCar,

AYRO, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of DropCar,AYRO, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019,2020, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations. As described in Note 2, these conditions, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Accounting for Warrants

Critical Audit Matter Description

As discussed in Notes 2 and 10 to the financial statements, the Company issued series of warrants to purchase common stock in connection with the merger transaction, registered direct and private placement offerings and compensation for service agreements entered into during the year ended December 31, 2020. All warrants were evaluated for proper classification on the balance sheet and it was determined that all warrants should be classified as permanent equity instruments.

Auditing the accounting conclusions for the issuance of the warrants discussed above was challenging because of the complex provisions affecting classification and required extensive audit effort. The accounting for the warrants involved an assessment of the particular features of each type of warrant, and the impact of those features on the accounting and classification of the warrants.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

To test the accounting and determine proper classification of the warrants, our audit procedures included, among others, inspecting the agreements and evaluating the application of the Company’s technical accounting analyses. Our audit procedures also included the involvement of personnel with specialized knowledge and skill in debt and equity accounting to evaluate the appropriateness of management’s interpretation on how to apply relevant accounting guidance for the classification of the warrants issued, including evaluating the terms and management’s conclusion on the interpretation and application of the relevant accounting literature.

Stock-based Compensation

Critical Audit Matter Description

As discussed in Notes 2 and 11 to the financial statements, the Company grants stock-based awards including stock options, restricted stock and performance-based stock awards to their employees as compensation for their service. The Company recorded approximately $1.8 million of stock-based compensation expense during the year ended December 31, 2020. Certain awards include performance conditions that only vest upon achievement of certain milestones. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Board of Directors modified the vesting terms and had issued 651,250 of such awards.

Auditing the Company’s accounting for stock-based compensation required complex auditor judgment due to the number and the variety of the types of equity awards, the subjectivity of assumptions used to value stock-based awards and the frequent use of performance-based vesting conditions. In particular, judgment was required to evaluate the nature of the annual performance conditions, as well as to assess the satisfaction of the performance targets.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

To test the accounting, we tested the accuracy and completeness of the data used in measuring the awards by agreeing the underlying inputs, such as grant date, grant price, performance targets and vesting terms, among others, back to source documents, such as compensation meeting minutes or award letters. Additionally, we tested the related volatility assumptions prepared by management by assessing their valuation methodologies and assumptions used. We determined whether milestone targets were satisfied in accordance with the contractual conditions and the effect on the modified vesting terms, and recalculated grant date fair value. We also evaluated the adequacy of the Company’s stock-based compensation disclosures included in Note 11 in relation to these matters.

/s/ Friedman LLP
  
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2019.2020.
  
East Hanover, New Jersey
March 30, 202031, 2021

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors and Stockholders of

DropCar,

Ayro, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of DropCar,Ayro, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018,2019 and the related consolidated statementsstatement of operations, stockholders’income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year thenperiod ended December 31, 2019 and the related notes, (collectivelycollectively referred to as the “financial statements”)."financial statements.” In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018,2019 and the consolidated results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for the year then ended December 31, 2019 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Going Concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has an accumulated deficit of approximately $29.8 million and negative cash flow from continuing operations of approximately $10.6 million that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These

The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We have served as the Company’s auditor from 2017 to 2019.since 2017.

Denver, Colorado
March 11, 2020/S/ Plante & Moran, PLLC

F-2
/s/ EISNERAMPER LLP
New York, New York
April 1, 2019 (except for the matter described in Note 4, as to which the date is March 30, 2020)

 
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31,
 
 
 
2019
 
 
2018
 
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CURRENT ASSETS:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash
 $4,259,091 
 $3,887,910 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
  181,805 
  220,845 
Current assets held for sale
  375,186 
  818,963 
Total current assets
  4,816,082 
  4,927,718 
 
    
    
Noncurrent assets held for sale
  441,395 
  702,438 
 
    
    
TOTAL ASSETS
 $5,257,477 
 $5,630,156 
 
    
    
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
    
    
 
    
    
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
    
    
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
 $1,348,356 
 $1,305,071 
Current liabilities held for sale
  1,040,776 
  1,286,689 
TOTAL LIABILITIES
  2,389,132 
  2,591,760 
 
    
    
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
    
    
 
    
    
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
    
    
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized
    
    
Series seed preferred stock, 842,405 shares authorized, zero issued and outstanding;
  - 
  - 
Series A preferred stock, 1,963,877 shares authorized, zero issued and outstanding;
  - 
  - 
Convertible Series H, 8,500 shares designated, 8 shares issued and outstanding;
  - 
  - 
Convertible Series H-1, 9,488 shares designated, zero shares issued and outstanding;
  - 
  - 
Convertible Series H-2, 3,500 shares designated, zero shares issued and outstanding;
  - 
  - 
Convertible Series H-3, 8,461 shares designated, 2,189 shares issued and outstanding;
  - 
  - 
Convertible Series H-4, 30,000 shares designated, 5,028 and 26,619 shares issued and outstanding;
  1 
  3 
Convertible Series H-5, 50,000 shares designated, 34,722 and zero shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018;
  3 
  - 
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 4,061,882 and 1,633,394 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively
  406 
  163 
Additional paid in capital
  37,581,914 
  32,791,951 
Accumulated deficit
  (34,713,979)
  (29,753,721)
 
    
    
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
  2,868,345 
  3,038,396 
 
    
    
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
 $5,257,477 
 $5,630,156 

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

  December 31, 
  2020  2019 
ASSETS        
Current assets:        
Cash $36,537,097  $641,822 
Accounts receivable, net  765,850   71,146 
Inventory, net  1,173,254   1,118,516 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  1,608,762   164,399 
Total current assets  40,084,963   1,995,883 
         
Property and equipment, net  611,312   489,366 
Intangible assets, net  143,845   244,125 
Operating lease – right-of-use asset  1,098,819   - 
Deposits and other assets  22,491   48,756 
Total assets $41,961,430  $2,778,130 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
         
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $767,205  $772,077 
Accrued expenses  665,068   612,136 
Contract liability  24,000   - 
Current portion long-term debt, net  7,548   1,006,947 
Current portion lease obligation – operating lease  123,139   - 
Total current liabilities  1,586,960   2,391,160 
         
Long-term debt, net  14,060   318,027 
Lease obligation - operating lease, net of current portion  1,002,794   - 
Total liabilities  2,603,814   2,709,187 
         
Commitments and contingencies        
         
Stockholders’ equity:        
Preferred Stock, (authorized – 20,000,000 shares)  -   - 
Convertible Preferred Stock Series H, ($0.0001 par value; authorized – 8,500 shares; issued and outstanding – 8 and zero shares, respectively)  -   - 
Convertible Preferred Stock Series H-3, ($.0001 par value; authorized – 8,461 shares; issued and outstanding – 1,234 and zero shares, respectively)  -   - 
Convertible Preferred Stock Series H-6, ($.0001 par value; authorized – 50,000 shares; issued and outstanding – 50 and zero shares, respectively)  -   - 
Convertible Seed Preferred Stock, ($1.00 par value; authorized – zero shares; issued and outstanding – zero and 7,360,985 shares, respectively)  -   9,025,245 
Common Stock, ($0.0001 par value; authorized – 100,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding – 27,088,584 and 3,948,078 shares, respectively)  2,709   395 
Additional paid-in capital  64,509,724   5,001,947 
Accumulated deficit  (25,154,817)  (13,958,644)
Total stockholders’ equity  39,357,616   68,943 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $41,961,430  $2,778,130 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3
F-4
 
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31
 
 
 
2019
 
 
2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OPERATING EXPENSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
General and administrative expenses
 $2,477,160 
 $2,230,634 
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
  2,477,160 
  2,230,634 
 
    
    
OPERATING LOSS
  (2,477,160)
  (2,230,634)
 
    
    
Interest expense
  - 
  (672,144)
 
    
    
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
  (2,477,160)
  (2,902,778)
 
    
    
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
    
    
Loss from operations of discontinued components, net of taxes
  (2,425,223)
  (11,676,667)
Loss on sale of component, net of taxes
  - 
  (4,169,718)
LOSS ON DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
  (2,425,223)
  (15,846,385)
 
    
    
NET LOSS
 $(4,902,383)
 $(18,749,163)
 
    
    
Deemed dividend on Series H-4 warrant and preferred stock modification
  (57,875)
  - 
Deemed dividend on exchange of warrants
  - 
  (1,399,661)
 
    
    
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
 $(4,960,258)
 $(20,148,824)
 
    
    
AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
    
    
Loss from continuing operations
 $(2,535,035)
 $(4,302,439)
Loss from discontinued operations
  (2,425,223)
  (15,846,385)
NET LOSS
 $(4,960,258)
 $(20,148,824)
 
    
    
LOSS PER SHARE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS:
    
    
   Basic
 $(0.72)
 $(3.18)
   Diluted
 $(0.72)
 $(3.18)
LOSS PER SHARE FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
    
    
   Basic
 $(0.68)
 $(11.71)
   Diluted
 $(0.68)
 $(11.71)
NET LOSS PER SHARE:
    
    
   Basic
 $(1.40)
 $(14.89)
   Diluted
 $(1.40)
 $(14.89)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
    
    
   Basic
  3,541,511 
  1,352,826 
   Diluted
  3,541,511 
  1,352,826 

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Revenue $1,604,069  $890,152 
Cost of goods sold  1,770,552   691,843 
Gross (loss) profit  (166,483)  198,309 
         
Operating expenses:        
Research and development  1,920,548   714,281 
Sales and marketing  1,415,282   1,300,120 
General and administrative  6,603,935   6,678,310 
Total operating expenses  9,939,765   8,692,711 
         
Loss from operations  (10,106,248)  (8,494,402)
         
Other (expense) income:        
Other income  236,923   2,188 
Interest expense  (327,196)  (172,479)
Loss on extinguishment of debt  (566,925)  - 
Total other expense, net  (657,198)  (170,291)
         
Net loss $(10,763,446) $(8,664,693)
         
Deemed dividend on modification of Series H-5 warrants  (432,727)  - 
Net loss attributable to Common Stockholders $(11,196,173) $(8,664,693)
         
Net loss per share, basic and diluted $(0.73) $(2.95)
         
Basic and diluted weighted average Common Stock outstanding  15,336,617   2,940,975 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4
F-5
 
DropCar Inc., and Subsidiaries
 
 
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Series Seed
 
 
Series A
 
 
Series H
 
 
Series H-3
 
 
Series H-4
 
 
Series H-5
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Additional
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred Stock
 
 
Preferred Stock
 
 
Preferred Stock
 
 
Preferred Stock
 
 
Preferred Stock
 
 
Preferred Stock
 
 
Common Stock
 
 
Paid-in
 
 
Accumulated
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shares
 
 
Amount
 
 
Shares
 
 
Amount
 
 
Shares
 
 
Amount
 
 
Shares
 
 
Amount
 
 
Shares
 
 
Amount
 
 
Shares
 
 
Amount
 
 
Shares
 
 
Amount
 
 
Capital
 
 
(Deficit)
 
 
Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balances, January 1, 2018
  275,691 
 $27 
  611,944 
 $61 
  - 
 $- 
  - 
 $- 
  - 
 $- 
  - 
 $- 
  374,285 
 $37 
 $5,115,158 
 $(9,604,897)
 $(4,489,614)
Issuance of common stock for cash
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  10,057 
  1 
  299,999 
  - 
  300,000 
Conversion of debt into common stock
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  136,785 
  14 
  3,682,488 
  - 
  3,682,502 
Conversion of accrued interest into common stock
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  4,518 
  - 
  159,584 
  - 
  159,584 
Interest on lock-up shares in relation to convertible debt
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  85,571 
  9 
  672,135 
  - 
  672,144 
Exchange of shares in connection with Merger
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  490,422 
  49 
  9,792,139 
  - 
  9,792,188 
Conversion of outstanding Preferred Stock in connection with Merger
  (275,691)
  (27)
  (611,944)
  (61)
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  147,939 
  15 
  73 
  - 
  - 
Issuance of Series H preferred stock in connection with Merger
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  8 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
Issuance of Series H-3 preferred stock in connection with Merger
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  2,189 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
Issuance of Series H-4 preferred stock and warrants in private placement, net of costs of $101,661
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  26,843 
  3 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  5,898,336 
  - 
  5,898,339 
Issuance of common shares in connection with exercise of H-4 warrants
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  260,116 
  26 
  936,397 
  - 
  936,423 
Issuance of Pre-Funded Series K Warrants net of costs of $15,000
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  968,329 
  - 
  968,329 
Stock based compensation for options issued to employees (net of forfeitures)
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  434,555 
  - 
  434,555 
Stock based compensation for restricted stock units issued to employees
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  2,954,124 
  - 
  2,954,124 
Stock based compensation for common stock issued to service providers
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  60,262 
  6 
  478,979 
  - 
  478,985 
Deemed dividend on exchange of merger warrants to Series I warrants and common stock
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  48,786 
  5 
  316,856 
  (316,861)
  - 
Deemed dividend on modification of H-4 Warrants and issuance of Series J warrants
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  1,019,040 
  (1,019,040)
  - 
Deemed dividend on modification of H-4 Warrants
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  63,760 
  (63,760)
  - 
Conversion of Series H-4 Preferred Stock into common stock
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  (224)
  - 
  - 
  - 
  14,653 
  1 
  (1)
  - 
  - 
Net Loss
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  (18,749,163)
  (18,749,163)
Balance, December 31, 2018
  - 
 $- 
  - 
  - 
  8 
  - 
  2,189 
  - 
  26,619 
  3 
  - 
  - 
  1,633,394 
  163 
  32,791,951 
  (29,753,721)
  3,038,396 
Issuance of common stock for cash net of costs of $15,000
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  478,469 
  48 
  1,984,953 
  - 
  1,985,001 
Exercise of warrants
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  277,778 
  28 
  16,639 
  - 
  16,667 
Conversion of Series H-4 preferred stock into common stock
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  (21,591)
  (2)
  - 
  - 
  1,412,420 
  141 
  (139)
  - 
  - 
Stock based compensation for options issued to employees
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  86,811 
  - 
  86,811 
Stock based compensation for restricted stock units issued to employees
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  289,842 
  - 
  289,842 
Stock based compensation for common stock issued to service providers
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  116,666 
  12 
  222,188 
  - 
  222,200 
Stock based compensation for restricted stock issued to the board of directors
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  25,000 
  - 
  25,000 
Issuance of common stock upon vesting of restricted stock units
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  276,290 
  27 
  (27)
  - 
  - 
Common stock reserved and retired for excess tax benefits from stock based compensation
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  (133,135)
  (13)
  (193,176)
  - 
  (193,189)
Issuance of Series H-5 preferred stock and warrants in private placement net of costs of $200,000
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  34,722 
  3 
  - 
  - 
  2,299,997 
  - 
  2,300,000 
Deemed dividend on modificaiton of H-4 warrants
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  57,875 
  (57,875)
  - 
Net Loss
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
  (4,902,383)
  (4,902,383)
Balance, December 31, 2019
  - 
 $- 
  - 
 $- 
  8 
 $- 
  2,189 
 $- 
  5,028 
 $1 
  34,722 
 $3 
  4,061,882 
 $406 
 $37,581,914 
 $(34,713,979)
 $2,868,345 

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  Years Ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 
  Series H     Series H-3     Series H-6     AYRO Series Seed                   
  Preferred Stock     Preferred Stock     Preferred Stock     Preferred Stock     Common Stock     Additional Paid-in  Accumulated    
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  (Deficit)  Total 
Balance, January 1, 2019  -  $-   -  $-   -  $-   3,882,791  $4,270,507   2,793,591  $279  $1,131,551  $(5,293,951) $108,386 
Preferred Stock issued for cash                          3,478,194   4,754,738                   4,754,738 
Sale of Common Stock, net of fees                                  1,154,487   116   4,118       4,234 
Stock based compensation                                          3,372,726       3,372,726 
Discount on debt                                          493,552       493,552 
Net loss                                              (8,664,693)  (8,664,693)
December 31, 2019  -  $-   -  $-   -  $-   7,360,985  $9,025,245   3,948,078  $395  $5,001,947  $(13,958,644) $68,943 
                                                     
Conversion of AYRO Preferred Stock to common stock                          (7,360,985)  (9,025,245)  2,007,193   201   9,025,044       - 
Issuance of Series H Preferred Stock in connection with the 2020 Merger  8   -                                           - 
Issuance of Series H-3 Preferred Stock in connection with the 2020 Merger          2,189   -                                   - 
Issuance of Series H-6 Preferred Stock in connection with the 2020 Merger                  7,883   -                           - 
Conversion of Series H-6 Preferred Stock                  (7,833)              225,590   23   (23)      - 
Issuance of Common Stock in connection with the 2020 Merger, net of fees                                  4,948,377   495   4,451,235       4,451,730 
Exchange of debt for Common Stock in connection with the 2020 Merger                                  1,030,585   103   999,897       1,000,000 
Issuance of Common Stock in connection with debt offering                                  553,330   56   461,957       462,013 
Sale of Common Stock, net of fees                                  9,278,059   928   38,409,253       38,410,181 
Conversion of Series H-3 Preferred Stock          (955)                      795               - 
Exercise of warrants, net of fees                                  5,074,645   507   3,926,311       3,926,818 
Exercise of stock options                                  6,817   -   16,669       16,669 
Stock based compensation                                          1,736,791       1,736,791 
Vested restricted stock                                  15,115   1   47,916       47,917 
Deemed divided on modification of H-5 warrants                                          432,727   (432,727)  - 
Net loss                                              (10,763,446)  (10,763,446)
December 31, 2020       8  $           -   1,234  $        -   50  $        -   -  $-     27,088,584  $2,709  $  64,509,724  $  (25,154,817) $39,357,616 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6
 
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
 
 
 
 
 
 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2019
 
 
2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
 $(4,902,383)
 $(18,749,163)
Loss from discontinued operations
  2,425,223 
  15,846,385 
Loss from continuing operations
  (2,477,160)
  (2,902,778)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
    
    
Stock based compensation
  280,275 
  82,436 
Non-cash interest expense
  - 
  672,144 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
    
    
Prepaid expenses and other assets
  39,040 
  (220,845)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
  48,009 
  1,305,071 
 
    
    
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES - CONTINUING OPERATIONS
  (2,109,836)
  (1,063,972)
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
  (1,485,004)
  (9,502,946)
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES
  (3,594,840)
  (10,566,918)
 
    
    
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
    
    
Cash received upon acquisition
  - 
  4,947,023 
Proceeds from sale of component, net of cash relinquished
  - 
  1,995,634 
 
    
    
NET CASH PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES - CONTINUING OPERATIONS
  - 
  6,942,657 
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
  (142,458)
  (497,102)
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES
  (142,458)
  6,445,555 
 
    
    
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
    
    
Proceeds from the sale of common stock
  2,000,001 
  300,000 
Financing fees in connection with the sale of common stock
  (15,000)
  - 
Common stock reserved and retired in connection with excess tax benefits paid
  (193,189)
  - 
Proceeds from the sale of Series H-5 preferred stock and warrants
  2,500,000 
  - 
Financing fees in connection with the sale of Series H-5 preferred stock and warrants
  (200,000)
  - 
Proceeds from the sale of Series H-4 preferred stock and warrants
  - 
  6,000,000 
Financing costs from the sale of Series H-4 preferred stock and warrants
  - 
  (101,661)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of H-4 warrants
  16,667 
  936,423 
Proceeds from the sale of Series K Warrants
  - 
  983,333 
Financing costs from the sale of Series K warrants
  - 
  (15,000)
 
    
    
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES - CONTINUING OPERATIONS
  4,108,479 
  8,103,095 
NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
  - 
  (50,263)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
  4,108,479 
  8,052,832 
 
    
    
 
    
    
Net increase in cash, including cash classified within current assets held for sale
  371,181 
  3,931,469 
Less: Net increase in cash classified within current assets held for sale
  - 
  (43,559)
Net increase in cash
  371,181 
  3,887,910 
 
    
    
Cash, beginning of year
  3,887,910 
  - 
 
    
    
Cash, end of year
 $4,259,091 
 $3,887,910 
 
    
    
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
    
    
 
    
    
Cash paid for interest
 $- 
 $- 
Cash paid for taxes
 $- 
 $- 
Issuance of common stock for accrued stock based compensation
 $4,724 
 $- 
Assets acquired under operating leases included in assets held for sale
 $23,040 
 $- 
 
    
    
NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
    
    
Stock issued to WPCS Shareholder in the merger, net of cash received of 4,947,023
 $- 
 $4,845,200 
Series H-4 offering cost paid in H-4 shares and warrants
 $- 
 $568,648 
Stock issued for convertible note payable
 $- 
 $3,682,502 
Stock issued for accrued interest on convertible note payable
 $- 
 $159,584 
Deemed dividends on warrant issuances
 $- 
 $1,399,656 
Deemed dividend on Series H-4 warrant and preferred stock modification
 $57,875 
 $- 

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2020  2019 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:        
Net loss $(10,763,446) $(8,664,693)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  447,283   722,566 
Stock-based compensation  1,827,008   3,372,726 
         
Amortization of debt discount  236,398   152,243 
Loss on extinguishment of debt  566,925   - 
Amortization of right-of-use asset  111,861   - 
Provision for bad debt expense  37,745   29,099 
Debt forgiveness (PPP loan)  (218,000)  - 
Change in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (732,449)  159,986 
Inventories  (4,967)  532,089 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (1,444,363)  4,656 
Deposits  26,265   (6,917)
Accounts payable  (59,489)  (715,267)
Accrued expenses  10,632   319,225 
Contract liability  24,000   (9,999)
Lease obligations - operating leases  (84,747)  - 
Net cash used in operating activities  (10,019,344)  (4,104,286)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Purchase of property and equipment  (504,332)  (469,834)
Disposals of property and equipment  -   90,747 
Purchase of intangible assets  (14,388)  (35,559)
Disposal of intangible assets  -   40,294 
Proceeds from merger with ABC Merger Sub, Inc.  3,060,740   - 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  2,542,020   (374,352)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Proceeds from issuance debt  1,318,000   2,675,000 
Repayments of debt  (1,744,676)  (116,392)
Proceeds from exercise of warrants, net of fees and expenses  3,926,818   - 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  16,669   - 
Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock, net of fees and expenses  39,855,788   4,234 
Proceeds from issuance of Preferred Stock  -   2,518,375 
Net cash provided by financing activities  43,372,599   5,081,217 
         
Net change in cash  35,895,275   602,579 
         
Cash, beginning of year  641,822   39,243 
         
Cash, end of year $36,537,097  $641,822 
         
Supplemental disclosure of cash and non-cash transactions:        
Cash paid for interest $102,911  $32,786 
Conversion of notes payable to Preferred Stock $-  $1,136,363 
Conversion of accounts payable to Preferred Stock $-  $1,100,000 
Conversion of accounts payable to notes payable $-  $137,729 
Discount on debt from issuance of common stock $-  $493,553 
Interest forgiven on PPP loan $1,363  $- 
Conversion of debt to Common Stock $1,000,000  $- 
Conversion of Preferred Stock to Common Stock $9,025,245  $- 
Cashless exercise of 76,999 H-5 warrants $192,500  $- 
Discount on debt with related party $462,013  $- 
Deemed divided on modification of Series H-5 warrants $432,727  $- 
Restricted Stock for service, vested not issued $42,300 $- 
Offering costs included in accounts payable, not paid $54,617 $- 
Supplemental non-cash amounts of lease liabilities arising from obtaining right of use assets $1,210,680  $- 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. statements.

F-6
F-7

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. NATURE OF THE BUSINESS

Organization

AYRO, Inc. (“AYRO” or the “Company”), a Delaware corporation formerly known as DropCar, Inc. (“DropCar”), a corporation located outside Austin, Texas, is the merger successor discussed below of AYRO Operating Company, Inc., which was formed under the laws of the State of Texas on May 17, 2016 as Austin PRT Vehicle, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notessubsequently changed its name to Consolidated Financial Statements
1.            
Austin EV, Inc. under an Amended and Restated Articles of Formation filed with the State of Texas on March 9, 2017. On July 24, 2019, the Company changed its name to AYRO, Inc. and converted its corporate domicile to Delaware. The Company
DropCar Operating Business
was founded on the basis of promoting resource sustainability. The Company is principally engaged in manufacturing and sales of environmentally-conscious, minimal-footprint electric vehicles (“EV’s”). The all-electric vehicles are typically sold both directly and to dealers in the United States.

On May 28, 2020, pursuant to the previously announced Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated December 19, 2019, (the “Merger Agreement”) by and among the Company, ABC Merger Sub, Inc., a providerDelaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of automotivethe Company (“Merger Sub”), and AYRO Operating Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation previously known as AYRO, Inc. (“AYRO Operating”), Merger Sub was merged with and into AYRO Operating, with AYRO Operating continuing after the merger as the surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”). At the effective time of the Merger, without any action on the part of any stockholder, each issued and outstanding share of AYRO Operating’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, (the “AYRO Operating Common Stock”), including shares underlying AYRO Operating’s outstanding equity awards and warrants, was converted into the right to receive 1.3634 shares (the “Exchange Ratio”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Company Common Stock”). Immediately following the effective time of the Merger, the Company effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of the issued and outstanding Company Common Stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”), and immediately following the Reverse Stock Split, the Company issued a stock dividend of one share of Company Common Stock for each outstanding share of Common Stock to all holders of record immediately following the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split (the “Stock Dividend”). The net result of the Reverse Stock Split and the Stock Dividend was a 1-for-5 reverse stock split. Upon completion of the Merger and the transactions contemplated in the Merger Agreement and assuming the exercise in full of all pre-funded warrants issued pursuant thereto, (i) the former AYRO Operating equity holders (including the investors in a bridge financing and in private placements that closed prior to closing of the Merger) owned approximately 79% of the outstanding equity of the Company; (ii) former DropCar stockholders owned approximately 18% of the outstanding equity of the Company; and (iii) a financial advisor to DropCar and AYRO owned approximately 3% of the outstanding equity of the Company.

The Merger is being treated as a reverse recapitalization effected by a share exchange for financial accounting and reporting purposes since substantially all of DropCar, Inc.’s operations were disposed of as part of the consummation of the Merger and therefore no goodwill or other intangible assets were recorded by the Company as a result of the Merger. In connection with the disposal of DropCar, Inc. operations, AYRO assumed $186,000 of outstanding payables from DropCar plus cash of $186,000 to be used to satisfy those obligations. Payables in excess of those prefunded by DropCar will be the responsibility of AYRO. The Company does not believe any excess would constitute a material amount. AYRO Operating is treated as the accounting acquirer as its stockholders control the Company after the Merger, even though DropCar, Inc. was the legal acquirer. As a result, the assets and liabilities and the historical operations that are reflected in these consolidated financial statements are those of AYRO Operating as if AYRO Operating had always been the reporting company. All reference to AYRO Operating, Inc. shares of common stock, warrants and options have been presented on a post-merger, post-reverse split basis.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On December 19, 2019, DropCar entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with DC Partners Acquisition, LLC (“DC Partners”), Spencer Richardson and David Newman, pursuant to which DropCar agreed to sell substantially all of the assets associated with its business of providing vehicle support, fleet logistics and concierge services for both consumers and the automotive industry. Its cloud-based Enterprise Vehicle Assistanceindustry to an entity controlled by Messrs. Richardson and Logistics (“VAL”) platform and mobile application (“app”) assists consumers and automotive-related companies to reduce the costs, hassles and inefficiencies of owning a car, or fleet of cars, in urban centers.

In July 2018, the Company launched its Mobility Cloud platform which provides automotive-related businesses with a 100% self-serve SaaS version of its VAL platform to manage their own operations and drivers, as well as customer relationship management (“CRM”) tools that enable their clients to schedule and track their vehicles for service pickup and delivery. The Company’s Mobility Cloud also provides access to private application programming interfaces (“APIs”) which automotive-businesses can use to integrateNewman, the Company’s logistics and field support directly into their own applications and processes natively, to create more seamless client experiences. The Company earned de minimis revenues from Mobility Cloud in 2019. The Company did not earn any revenues from Mobility Cloud in 2018.
On the enterprise side, original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), dealers, and other service providers in the automotive space are increasingly being challenged with consumers who have limited time to bring in their vehicles for maintenance and service, making it difficult to retain valuable post-sale service contracts or scheduled consumer maintenance and service appointments. Additionally, many of the vehicle support centers for automotive providers (i.e., dealerships, including body work and diagnostic shops) have moved out of urban areas thus making it more challenging for OEMs and dealers in urban areas to provide convenient and efficient service for their consumer and business clientele. Similarly, shared mobility providers and other fleet managers, such as rental car companies and car share programs, face a similar urban mobility challenge: getting cars to and from service bays, rebalancing vehicle availability to meet demand in fleeting and de- fleeting vehicles to and from dealer lots, auction sites and to other locations.
In July 2018, the Company began assessing demand for a Self-Park Spaces monthly parking plan whereby consumers could designate specific garages for their vehicles to be stored at a base monthly rate, with personal 24/7 access for picking up and returning their vehicle directly, and the option to pay a la carte on a per hour basis for a driver to perform functions such as picking up and returning their vehicle to their front door. This model aligns more directly with how the Company has structured the enterprise Business-to-Business (“B2B”) side of its business, where an interaction with a vehicle on behalf of its drivers typically generates new revenue. The Company consumer Self-Park Spaces plan combined with its on-demand hourly valet service are the only consumer plans offered from September 1, 2018 onwards. Subscriber plans prior to this date continued to receive service on a prorated basis through the end of August 2018. Additionally, the Company is scaling back its DropCar 360 Services on Demand Service (“360 Services”) for the Consumer portion of the market. As a result of this shift, in August 2018, the Company began to significantly streamline its field teams, operations and back office support tied to its pre-September 1, 2018 consumer subscription plans. The scaling back of these services and the discontinuation of the Company’s monthly parking with front door valet (“Steve”) service resulted in a decrease in revenue.
To date, the Company operates primarily in the New York metropolitan area. In May, June, and August 2018, the Company expanded operations with its B2B business in San Francisco, Washington DC, and Los Angeles, respectively. These three new market expansions are with an OEM customer.
Merger and Exchange Ratio - WPCS
On January 30, 2018, DC Acquisition Corporation (“Merger Sub”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of WPCS International Incorporated (“WPCS”), completed its merger with and into DropCar, Inc. (“Private DropCar”), with Private DropCar surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of WPCS. This transaction is referred to as the “WPCS Merger.” The WPCS Merger was effected pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization (the “WPCS Merger Agreement”), dated September 6, 2017, by and among WPCS, Private DropCar and Merger Sub.
As a result of the WPCS Merger, each outstanding share of Private DropCar share capital (including shares of Private DropCar share capital issued upon the conversion of outstanding convertible debt) automatically converted into the right to receive approximately 0.3273 shares of WPCS’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Exchange Ratio”). Following the closing of the WPCS Merger, holders of WPCS’s common stock immediately prior to the WPCS Merger owned approximately 22.9% on a fully diluted basis, and holders of Private DropCar common stock immediately prior to the WPCS Merger owned approximately 77.1% on a fully diluted basis, of WPCS’s common stock.
F-8
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The WPCS Merger has been accounted for as a reverse acquisition under the acquisition method of accounting where Private DropCar is considered the accounting acquirer and WPCS is the acquired company for financial reporting purposes. Private DropCar was determined to be the accounting acquirer based on the terms of the WPCS Merger Agreement and other factors, such as relative voting rights and the composition of the combined company’s board of directors and senior management, which was deemed to have control. The pre-acquisition financial statements of Private DropCar became the historical financial statements of WPCS following the WPCS Merger. The historical financial statements, outstanding shares and all other historical share information have been adjusted by multiplying the respective share amount by the Exchange Ratio as if the Exchange Ratio had been in effect for all periods presented.
Immediately following the WPCS Merger, the combined company changed its name from WPCS International Incorporation to DropCar, Inc. The combined company following the WPCS Merger may be referred to herein as “the combined company,” “DropCar,” or the “Company.”
Merger with AYRO
On December 19, 2019, DropCar, ABC Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of DropCar (“ABC Merger Sub”), and Ayro, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“AYRO”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization (the “AYRO Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which, among other matters, and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in the AYRO Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into AYRO, with AYRO continuing as a wholly owned subsidiary of DropCar and the surviving corporation of the merger (the “AYRO Merger”). 
Subject to the terms and conditions of the AYRO Merger Agreement, at the closing of the AYRO Merger, (a) each outstanding share of AYRO common stock and AYRO preferred stock will be converted into the right to receive shares of DropCar common stock (the “DropCar Common Stock”) (after giving effect to a reverse stock split of DropCar Common Stock, as described below) equal to the exchange ratio described below; and (b) each outstanding AYRO stock option and AYRO warrant that has not previously been exercised prior to the closing of the AYRO Merger will be assumed by DropCar.
Under the exchange ratio formula in the AYRO Merger Agreement, upon the closing of the AYRO Merger, on a pro forma basis and based upon the number of shares of DropCar common stock to be issued in the AYRO Merger, current DropCar shareholders (along with DropCar’s financial advisor) will own approximately 20% of the combined company and current AYRO investors will own approximately 80% of the combined company (including the additional financing transaction referenced below). For purposes of calculating the exchange ratio, the number of outstanding shares of DropCar common stock immediately prior to the Merger does not take into effect the dilutive effect of shares of DropCar common stock underlying options, warrants or certain classes of preferred stock outstanding as of the date of the AYRO Merger Agreement.
If the AYRO merger is completed, holders of outstanding shares of AYRO common stock and preferred stock (collectively referred to herein as the AYRO equity holders) will be entitled to receive shares of DropCar common stock at an agreed upon exchange ratio per share of AYRO common stock they hold or into which their shares of preferred stock convert (the “AYRO Exchange Ratio”). Upon completion of the AYRO merger and the transactions contemplated in the AYRO Merger Agreement and assuming the exercise of the Pre-funded Warrants, (i) AYRO equity holders (including the investors in the bridge financing, the AYRO private placements, and the nominal stock subscription and a consultant to AYRO) will own the majority of the outstanding equity of DropCar. Immediately following the AYRO merger, subject to the approval of the current DropCar stockholders, it is anticipated that the combined company will effect a reverse stock split with respect to its issued and outstanding common stock. The reverse stock split will increase DropCar’s stock price to at least $5.00 per share. 
F-9
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Prior to the execution and delivery of the AYRO Merger Agreement, and as a condition of the willingness of the parties to enter into the AYRO Merger Agreement, certain stockholders have entered into agreements with AYRO pursuant to which such stockholders have agreed, subject to the terms and conditions of such agreements, to purchase, prior to the consummation of the AYRO Merger, shares of Ayro’s common stock (or common stock equivalents) and warrants to purchase Ayro's common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $2.0 million (the “AYRO Pre-Closing Financing”). The consummation of the transactions contemplated by such agreements is conditioned upon the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in the AYRO Merger Agreement. After consummation of the AYRO Merger, Ayro has agreed to cause DropCar to register the resale of the DropCar Common Stock issued and issuable pursuant to the warrants issued to the investors in the AYRO Pre-Closing Financing.
Consummation of the AYRO Merger is subject to certain closing conditions, including, among other things, approval by the stockholders of the Company and AYRO, the continued listing of the Company’s common stock on The Nasdaq Stock Market after the AYRO Merger and satisfaction of minimum net cash thresholds by the Company and AYRO. The impact of the Company’s appeal to The Nasdaq Stock Market as discussed below and COVID-19 could negatively affect our stock price. In accordance with the terms of the AYRO Merger Agreement, (i) certain executive officers, directors and stockholders of AYRO (solely in their respective capacities as AYRO stockholders) holding approximately 57% of the outstanding AYRO capital stock have entered into voting agreements with the Company to vote all of their shares of AYRO capital stock in favor of adoption of the AYRO Merger Agreement (the “AYRO Voting Agreements”) and (ii) certain executive officers, directors and stockholders of the Company (solely in their respective capacities as stockholders of the Company) holding approximately 10% of the Company’s outstanding common stock have entered into voting agreements with AYRO to vote all of their shares of the Company’s common stock in favor of approval of the AYRO Merger Agreement (the “DropCar Voting Agreements” and, together with the AYRO Voting Agreements, the “Voting Agreements”). The Voting Agreements include covenants with respect to the voting of such shares in favor of approving the transactions contemplated by the AYRO Merger Agreement and against any competing acquisition proposals.  In addition, concurrently with the execution of the AYRO Merger Agreement, (i) certain executive officers, directors and stockholders of AYRO and (ii) certain directors of the Company have entered into lock-up agreements (the “Lock-Up Agreements”) pursuant to which they accepted certain restrictions on transfers of shares of the Company’s common stock for the one-year period following the closing of the AYRO Merger.
The AYRO Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for both DropCar and AYRO, and further provides that, upon termination of the AYRO Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, either party may be required to pay the other party a termination fee of $1,000,000, or in some circumstances reimburse the other party’s reasonable expenses. 
At the effective time of the AYRO Merger, the Board of Directors of DropCar is expected to consist of seven members, three of whom will be designated by AYRO, three of whom will be designated by DropCar and one of whom will be designated by the lead investor in the AYRO Pre-Closing Financing. The AYRO Merger Agreement contains certain provisions providing for the ability of AYRO to designate additional members upon the achievement of certain business milestones.
Discontinued Operations – DropCar Operating
On December 19, 2019 and concurrently upon entering in the AYRO Merger Agreement, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement (“Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among Company, DropCar Operating Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“DropCar Operating”), and DC Partners Acquisition, LLC (the “Purchaser”), Spencer Richardson, our Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer and David Newman, our Co-Founder and Chief Business Development Officer pursuant to whichat the Company agreed to sell substantially all of the assets associated with its DropCar Operating business of providing vehicle support, fleet logistics and concierge services.time, respectively. The aggregate purchase price for the purchased assets consistsconsisted of the cancellation of certain liabilities pursuant to those certain employment agreements by and between DropCar Operating and each of Mr.Messrs. Richardson and Mr. Newman, plus the assumption of certain liabilities relating to, or arising out of, workers’ compensation claims that occurred prior to the closing date of the Asset Purchase Agreement. The sale of DropCar Operating represented a strategic shift that has had a major effect onOn May 28, 2020, the Company’s operations, and therefore, was presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of operations and consolidated statement of cash flows.
Completion ofparties to the Asset Purchase Agreement is subjectentered into Amendment No. 1 to certain conditions, including customary closing conditions relating to the (i) consummation of a Change in Control (as defined in the Asset Purchase Agreement)Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement Amendment”), includingwhich Asset Purchase Agreement Amendment (i) provides for the AYRO Merger andinclusion of up to $30,000 in refunds associated with certain insurance premiums as assets being purchased by DC Partners, (ii) amends the receipt by DropCarcovenant associated with the funding of the affirmative voteDropCar business, such that DropCar provided the DropCar business with additional funding of $175,000 at the closing of the holders of the majority of the shares of DropCar common stock entitled to vote on such matters with respect to the matterstransactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement.
F-10
DropCar, Inc.,Agreement and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Discontinued Operations – Suisun City Operations
On December 10, 2018,(iii) provides for a current employee of the Company signedbeing transferred to DC Partners to provide transition services to the Company for a definitive agreement with a private corporation and completedperiod of three months after the sale on December 24, 2018 of 100%closing of the Suisun City Operations, its wholly owned subsidiary, for a total cash considerationtransactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement. The Asset Purchase Agreement closed on May 28, 2020, immediately following the consummation of $3.5 million. the Merger.

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Liquidity and Other Uncertainties

The sale of Suisun City Operations represented a strategic shift that has had a major effect on the Company’s operations, and therefore, was presented as discontinued operationsconsolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the consolidated statementUnited States (“GAAP”), which contemplates continuation of operations and consolidated statement of cash flows.

Trading of Company’s stock
The Company’s shares of common stock listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market, previously trading through the close of business on January 30, 2018 under the ticker symbol “WPCS,” commenced trading on The Nasdaq Capital Market, on a post-Reverse Stock Split adjusted basis, under the ticker symbol “DCAR” on January 31, 2018.
On September 25, 2018, the Company receivedas a notification letter fromgoing concern. The Nasdaq Stock Market (the "Nasdaq") informingCompany is subject to a number of risks similar to those of earlier stage commercial companies, including dependence on key individuals and products, the Company that for the last 30 consecutive business days, the bid price of the Company’s securities had closed below $1.00 per share, which is the minimum required closing bid price for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market pursuant to Listing Rule 5550(a)(2). In order to regain compliance, on March 8, 2019, the Company filed a certificate of amendment to its amended and restated certificate of incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to effect a one-for-six reverse stock split of its outstanding shares of common stock. On March 26, 2019, the Company received a notification letter from the Nasdaq informing it that it had regained compliance with Listing Rule 5550(a)(2).
On August 19, 2019, the Company received a letter from the Listing Qualifications Department of the Nasdaq indicating that the Company no longer complies with the minimum stockholders' equity requirement under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1) for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market because the Company's stockholders' equity of $2,466,776, as reporteddifficulties inherent in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fordevelopment of a commercial market, the quarter ended June 30, 2019, was below the required minimum of $2,500,000. In December 2019, the Company received notification it has regained compliance.
On September 6, 2019, the Company received notificationpotential need to obtain additional capital, competition from Nasdaq stating that the Company did not comply with the minimum $1.00 bid price requirement for continued listing set forth in Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (the “Listing Rule”). In accordance with Nasdaq listing rules, the Company was afforded 180 calendar days (until March 4, 2020) to regain compliance with the Listing Rule. On March 5, 2020, the Company received notification from the Listing Qualification Department of Nasdaq that it had not regained compliance with the Listing Rule. The notification indicated that the Company’s common stock will be delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market unless it requested an appeal of this determination. On March 12, 2020, the Company requested a hearing to appeal the determination with the Nasdaq Hearings Panel (the “Panel”), which will postpone the delisting of the Company’s securities pending the Panel’s decision. The hearing is scheduled for April 16, 2020. The Company’s appeal to the Panel included a plan that sets forth a commitment to consider all available options to regain compliance with the Listing Rules, including the option to effectuate a reverse stock split upon receipt of stockholder approval, which the Company intend to seek in connection with the joint proxy statementlarger companies, other technology companies and consent solicitation statement/prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2020 in connection with the AYRO Merger, in order to bring the Company’s stock price over the $1.00 bid price requirement and to meet the $4.00 bid price initial listing requirement. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in regaining compliance with the Listing Rule.other technologies.
The Nasdaq notification has no effect at this time, or during the appeal period, on the listing of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq.
2.            
Liquidity and Going Concern
The Company has a limited operating history and the sales and income potential of its business and market are unproven. As of December 31, 2019,2020, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $34.7 million and has experiencedhad cash balances totaling $36,537,097. The Company incurred net losses eachof $10,763,446 and $8,664,693 and negative cash flows from operations of $10,019,344 and $4,104,286 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. In addition, overall working capital increased by $38,893,280 during the year since its inception.ended December 31, 2020. The Company anticipates that it will continue to incur net losses into the foreseeable future and will need to raise additional capital to continue. The Company’scontinue operations, however, throughout 2020 and in the first two months of 2021, the Company has raised sufficient cash is not sufficient to fund its operations through March 2021. These factors raise substantial doubt aboutfor at least the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for thenext twelve months following the dateissuance of these consolidated financial statements.

Since early 2020, when the filing of this Form 10-K.

F-11
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Management’s plan includes raising funds from outside investors and consummatingWorld Health Organization established the AYRO Merger. However, there is no assurance that the AYRO Merger will be consummated or that outside funding will be available to the Company, or that outside funding will be obtained on favorable terms or will provide the Company with sufficient capital to meet its objectives. There have been recent outbreaks in several countries, including the United States, of the highly transmissible and pathogenic coronavirus.coronavirus a global pandemic, there have been business slowdowns and decreased demand for ARYO products. The outbreak of such a communicable diseases could resultdisease has resulted in a widespread health crisis that couldwhich has adversely affectaffected general commercial activity and the economies and financial markets of many countries, including the United States. AnAs the outbreak of communicable diseases, or the perception that such an outbreak could occur,disease has continued through 2020 and into 2021, the measures taken by the governments of countries affected couldhas adversely affectaffected the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating toThe pandemic had an adverse impact on AYRO’s sales and the recoverability and classificationdemand for AYRO products in 2020, resulting in sales that were less than expected at the beginning of assets, carrying amounts or2020. ARYO expects the amount and classification of liabilities that may be required should the Company be unablepandemic to continue as a going concern.
3.            
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentationto have an adverse impact on sales and demand for products into 2021.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Principles of Consolidation

These

The consolidated financial statements represent the consolidation of DropCar, Inc., a Delaware corporation, are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.subsidiary in conformity with GAAP. All significant intercompany transactionsaccounts and amountstransactions have been eliminated. The results of businesses acquired and disposed of are includedeliminated in the consolidated financial statements from the date of the acquisition or up to the date of disposal, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company completed a reverse merger with WPCS International Incorporated, the parent company of WPCS International – Suisun City, Inc. (the “Suisun City Operations”), a wholly-owned subsidiary. Subsequently, the Company completed the sale of the wholly-owned Suisun City Operations and is reported in discontinued operations. Additionally, on December 19, 2019, the Company entered into an the Asset Purchase Agreement to sell the wholly-owned DropCar Operating component and is reported in discontinued operations. See Note 4 to the financial statements for further details.

Acquisition Accounting
The fair value of WPCS assets acquired and liabilities assumed was based upon management’s estimates assisted by an independent third-party valuation firm. As of December 31, 2018, the acquisition accounting was completed and there were no further adjustments to the assumptions. Critical estimates in valuing certain intangible assets include, but are not limited to, future expected cash flows from customer relationships and the trade name, present value and discount rates. Management’s estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable and, as a result, actual results may differ from estimates.
The purchase price allocation of million was as follows:
Fair value of equity consideration, 506,423 common shares
$9,792,000
Liability assumed: notes payable
158,000
Total purchase price consideration
$9,950,000
Tangible assets
Net working capital (1)
$6,664,000
Deferred revenue
(2,300,000)
Property and equipment
376,000
Intangible assets (2)
Customer contracts
1,200,000
Trade name
600,000
Goodwill
3,410,000
Total allocation of purchase price consideration
$9,950,000
(1) Net working capital consisted of cash of $4,947,000; accounts receivable and contract assets of $3,934,000; other assets of $317,000; accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $2,534,000.
F-12
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
consolidation.

(2) The useful lives related to the acquired customer relationships and trade name were expected to be approximately 10 years.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements, in conformity with US GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, andthe disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements;statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reportedreporting period. Generally, matters subject to estimation and judgementThe Company’s most significant estimates include amounts related toallowance for doubtful accounts, receivable realization, asset impairments,inventory, fair value of long-lived assets, useful lives offor property, plant and equipment and capitalized software costs,intangibles, valuation of deferred tax asset valuation allowances,allowance, and operating expense accruals.the measurement of stock-based compensation expenses. Actual results could differ from thosethese estimates.

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period financial statement presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net earnings or cash flows as previously reported.

Cash

and Cash Equivalents

Cash consists of checking accounts. The Company considers all highly liquid investmenthighly-liquid investments purchased with an originala maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash. At times, cash deposits may exceed FDIC-insuredequivalents. The Company maintains total cash balances in one account which exceeds the federally insured limits. AtManagement does not believe this results in any significant credit risk. The Company has no cash equivalents as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company applies Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, Fair Value Measurement (“ASC 820”), which establishes a framework for measuring fair value and clarifies the amountdefinition of fair value within that framework. ASC 820 defines fair value as an exit price, which is the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the Company’s principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy established in ASC 820 generally requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability and are developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs reflect the entity’s own assumptions based on market data and the entity’s judgments about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability and are to be developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.

The carrying amounts of financial instruments reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for current assets and current liabilities approximate the fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturities of the financial instruments.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The valuation hierarchy is composed of three levels. The classification within the valuation hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The levels within the valuation hierarchy are described below:

Level 1 — Assets and liabilities with unadjusted, quoted prices listed on active market exchanges. Inputs to the fair value measurement are observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Inputs to the fair value measurement are determined using prices for recently traded assets and liabilities with similar underlying terms, as well as direct or indirect observable inputs, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

Level 3 — Inputs to the fair value measurement are unobservable inputs, such as estimates, assumptions, and valuation techniques when little or no market data exists for the assets or liabilities.

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had on deposit that exceededdid not have any level 2 or level 3 instruments.

Accounts Receivable, Net

In the FDIC-insured limits was approximately $4.0 million.

Accounts receivable
normal course of business, the Company extends credit to customers. Accounts receivable, are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for holdbacks and doubtful receivables based on a review of all outstanding amounts. The Company determines the allowance for doubtful accounts, by regularly evaluating individual customerreflect the net realizable value of receivables and considering a customer’s financial condition, credit historyapproximate fair value. An allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained and current economic conditionsreflects the best estimate of probable losses determined principally on the basis of historical experience and set upspecific allowances for known troubled accounts. All accounts or portions thereof that are deemed to be uncollectible or that require an excessive collection cost are written off to the allowance for doubtful accounts. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had reserved an allowance for doubtful accounts of $73,829 and $36,084, respectively. All account receivables are made on an unsecured basis.

Inventory, Net

Inventory consists of purchased chassis, cabs, batteries, truck beds and component parts which includes cost of raw materials, freight, direct labor, and related production overhead and are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, as determined using a first-in, first-out method. Inventory also includes a fleet of internally manufactured vehicles that serve demonstration and other purposes, the balance of which is being depreciated over their useful lives. Management compares the cost of inventory with the net realizable value and, if applicable, an allowance is made for writing down the inventory to its net realizable value, if lower than cost. On an ongoing basis, inventory is reviewed for potential write-down for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory based upon forecasts for future demand and market conditions.

Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment, net, are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is recorded over the shorter of the estimated useful life, of one to ten years, or the lease term of the applicable assets using the straight-line method beginning on the date an asset is placed in service. The Company regularly evaluates the estimated remaining useful lives of the Company’s property and equipment, net, to determine whether events or changes in circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of depreciation. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense when collectionincurred.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The estimated useful lives for significant property and equipment categories are as follows:

Computer Equipment and Software1 – 3 years
Furniture and Fixtures2 – 7 years
Machinery and Equipment5 – 10 years
Leasehold ImprovementsShorter of useful or lease life

Long-Lived Assets, Including Definite-Lived Intangible Assets

Intangible assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is uncertain. Customers’ accountsgenerally recorded on a straight-line basis over estimated useful life of 5-10 years. The Company periodically reviews the estimated useful lives of intangible assets and makes adjustments when events indicate that a shorter life is appropriate.

Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable through the estimated undiscounted future cash flows derived from such assets.

Factors that the Company considers in deciding when to perform an impairment review include significant changes in the Company’s forecasted projections for the asset or asset group for reasons including, but not limited to, significant under-performance of a product in relation to expectations, significant changes, or planned changes in the Company’s use of the assets, significant negative industry or economic trends, and new or competing products that enter the marketplace. The impairment test is based on a comparison of the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated from the use of the asset group. If impairment is indicated, the asset is written off when all attempts to collect have been exhausted. Recoveriesdown by the amount by which the carrying value of accounts receivable previously written off arethe asset exceeds the related fair value of the asset with the related impairment charge recognized within the statements of operations. No impairment losses were identified or recorded as income when received. Atin the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 on the Company’s long-lived assets.

Leases

Operating lease assets are included within operating lease right-of-use assets, and 2018, the accounts receivable allowance was approximately $2,000corresponding operating lease obligation on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020. The Company has elected not to present short-term leases as these leases have a lease term of 12 months or less at lease inception and includeddo not contain purchase options or renewal terms that the Company is reasonably certain to exercise. All other lease assets and lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term at commencement date. Because most of the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate of return, the Company used an incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at adoption date in current assets held for sale.

determining the present value of lease payments.

Revenue Recognition

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, codified asCompany recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 606: 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, the core principle of which providesis that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this core principle, five basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) identify the contract with a single comprehensive model for entitiescustomer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to useperformance obligations in accounting forthe contract; and (5) recognize revenue arising from contracts with customers.

Revenue from contracts with customers is recognized when or as the Company satisfies itsa performance obligation.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Nature of goods and services

The following is a description of the Company’s products and services from which the Company generates revenue, as well as the nature, timing of satisfaction of performance obligations, by transferringand significant payment terms for each:

Product revenue

Product revenue from customer contracts is recognized on the promised goods or servicessale of each Electric Vehicle as vehicles are shipped to customers. The majority of the Company’s vehicle sales orders generally have only one performance obligation: sale of complete vehicles. Ownership and risk of loss transfers to the customers. A good or service is transferred to a customer when, or as,based on FOB shipping point and freight charges are the customer obtains controlresponsibility of that good or service. A performance obligation may be satisfied over time or at a point in time. Revenue from a performance obligation satisfied over time is recognized by measuring the Company’s progress in satisfying the performance obligation in a manner that depicts the transfer of the goods or services to the customer. Revenue is typically recognized at the point in which control transfers or in accordance with payment terms customary to the business. The Company provides product warranties to assure that the product assembly complies with agreed upon specifications. The Company’s product warranty is similar in all material respects to the product warranties provided by the Company’s suppliers, therefore minimizing the warranty liability to the standard labor rates associated with the defective part replacement. Customers do not have the option to purchase a warranty separately; as such, warranty is not accounted for as a separate performance obligation. The Company’s policy is to exclude taxes collected from a performance obligation satisfiedcustomer from the transaction price of automotive contracts.

Shipping revenue

Amounts billed to customers related to shipping and handling are classified as shipping revenue. The Company has elected to recognize the cost for freight and shipping when control over vehicles has transferred to the customer as a selling expense. The Company has reported shipping expenses of $134,310 and $75,791 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Subscription revenue

Subscription revenue from revenue sharing with Destination Fleet Operators (“DFO”) and other vehicle rental agreements is recorded in the month the vehicles in the Company’s fleet is rented. The Company established its rental fleet in late March 2019 which is recorded in the property and equipment section of the accompanying consolidated balance sheets – see Note 7. For the rental fleet, the Company retains title and ownership to the vehicles and places them in DFO’s in resort communities that typically rent golf cars for use in those communities. In August 2020, the Company phased-out the production of its 311 line of vehicles in order to develop a new line of vehicles. The change in production did not represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the Company’s operations or financial results.

Services and other revenue

Services and other revenue consist of non-warranty after-sales vehicle services. Revenue is typically recognized at a point in time is recognized atwhen services and replacement parts are provided.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Segment Reporting

The Company operates in one business segment which focuses on the point in time that the Company determines the customer obtains control over the promised good or service.manufacturing and sales of environmentally-conscious, minimal-footprint EVs. The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those promised goods or services (i.e., the “transaction price”). In determining the transaction price, the Company considers multiple factors,Company’s business offerings have similar economic and other characteristics, including the effectsnature of variable consideration. Variable consideration is included inproducts, manufacturing, types of customers, and distribution methods. The chief operating decision maker (CODM) reviews profit and loss information on a consolidated basis to assess performance and make overall operating decisions. The consolidated financial statements reflect the transaction price only tofinancial results of the extent it is probable that aCompany’s one reportable operating segment. The Company has no significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainties with respect to the amount are resolved. In determining when to include variable consideration in the transaction price, the Company considers the range of possible outcomes, the predictive value of its past experiences, the time period of when uncertainties expect to be resolved and the amount of consideration that is susceptible to factorsrevenues or tangible assets outside of the Company’s influence, such asUnited States.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income tax using an asset and liability approach, which allows for the judgmentrecognition of deferred tax benefits in future years. Under the asset and actionsliability approach, deferred taxes are provided for the net tax effects of third parties.

temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The Company’s contracts are generally designed to provide cash fees toaccounting for deferred income tax calculation represents management’s best estimate on the Company on a monthly basismost likely future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the consolidated financial statements or an agreed upfront rate based upon demand services. The Company’s performance obligation is satisfied over time as the servicetax returns and related future anticipation. A valuation allowance is provided continuously throughout the service period. The Company recognizes revenue evenly over the service period using a time-based measure becausefor deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not these items will either expire before the Company is providing a continuous serviceable to realize their benefits, or that future realization is uncertain. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, there were no accruals for uncertain tax positions.

Warrants and Preferred Shares

The accounting treatment of warrants and preferred share series issued is determined pursuant to the customer. Contractsguidance provided by ASC 470, Debt, ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, as applicable. Each feature of a freestanding financial instruments including, without limitation, any rights relating to subsequent dilutive issuances, dividend issuances, equity sales, rights offerings, forced conversions, optional redemptions, automatic monthly conversions, dividends and exercise are assessed with minimum performance guarantees or price concessions include variable consideration and are subject todeterminations made regarding the revenue constraint. proper classification in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company uses an expected value method to estimate variable considerationaccounts for minimum performance guarantees and price concessions.

F-13
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Monthly Subscriptions
The Company offers a selection of subscriptions and on-demand services which include parking, valet, and access to other services. The contract terms are on a month-to-month subscription contractstock-based compensation in accordance with fixed monthly or contract term fees. These subscription services include a fixed number of round-trip deliveries of the customer’s vehicle to a designated location. The Company allocates the purchase price among the performance obligations which results in deferring revenue until the service is utilized or the service period has expired.
On Demand Valet and Parking Services
The Company offers to consumers certain on demand services through its mobile application. The customer is billed at an hourly rate upon completion of the services. Revenue is recognized when the Company had satisfied all performance obligations which is upon completion of the service.
DropCar 360 Services on Demand Service
 The Company offers to consumers certain services upon request including vehicle inspection, maintenance, car washes or to fill up with gas. The customers are charged a fee in addition to the cost of the third-party services provided. Revenue is recognized on a gross basis when the Company had satisfied all performance obligations which is upon completion of the service.
On Demand Business-To-Business
The Company also has contracts with car dealerships, car share programs and others in the automotive industry transporting vehicles. Revenue is recognized at the point in time all performance obligations are satisfied which is when the Company provides the delivery service of the vehicles.
Employee Stock-BasedASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation
(“ASC 718”). The Company recognizes all employee share-based compensation as an expense in the financial statements.statements on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, based on the terms of the awards. Equity-classified awards principally related to stock options, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and equity-based compensation, are measured at the grant date fair value of the award. The Company determines grant date fair value of stock option awards using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The fair value of RSUs is determined using the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. For service-basedservice based vesting grants, expense is recognized ratably over the requisite service period based on the number of options or shares. Stock-based compensation is reversed for forfeitures in the period of forfeiture.
Property

In June 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2018-07”). ASU 2018-07 expands the guidance in ASC 718 to include share-based payments for goods and Equipment

Theservices to non-employees and generally aligns it with the guidance for share-based payments to employees. In accordance with ASU 2018-07, these stock options and warrants issued as compensation for services provided to the Company accounts for property and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation. The Company computes depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The Company generally depreciates property and equipment over a period of three to seven years. Depreciation for property and equipment commences once they are ready for its intended use.
Capitalized Software
Costs related to website and internal-use software development are accounted for in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 350-50 — Intangibles — Website Development Costs. Such software is primarily related to our websites and mobile apps, including support systems. We begin to capitalize our costs to develop software when preliminary development efforts are successfully completed, management has authorized and committed project funding, it is probable that the project will be completed, and the software will be used as intended. Costs incurred prior to meeting these criteria are expensed as incurred and recorded within General and administrative expenses within the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Costs incurred for enhancements that are expected to result in additional features or functionality are capitalized. Capitalized costs are amortized over the estimated useful life of the enhancements, generally between two and three years.
F-14
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets are primarily comprised of intangible assets, property and equipment, and capitalized software costs. The Company evaluates its Long-Lived Assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. If these circumstances exist, recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset group to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceedsbased upon the fair value of the assets. There were no impairments to long-lived assets for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Income Taxes
underlying equity instrument. The Company provides for income taxes using the asset and liability approach. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities and the tax rates in effect when these differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had a full valuation allowance against deferred tax assets.
Fair Value Measurement
The Company accounts for financial instruments in accordance with ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”). ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value.  The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).  The three levelsattribution of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense over the period during which services are described below:
Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2 – Quoted prices in markets that are not active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly;rendered.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Basic and

Level 3 – Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
Financial instruments with carrying values approximating fair value include cash, accounts receivable, other assets, convertible notes and accounts payable due to their short-term nature.
Diluted Loss Per Share

Basic and diluted net loss per share is computeddetermined by dividing net loss attributable to common shareholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of commonweighted average ordinary shares outstanding (the denominator) forduring the period. DilutedFor all periods presented with a net loss, perthe shares underlying the ordinary share is computed by assuming that any dilutive convertible securities outstanding were converted, with related preferred stock dividend requirementsoptions and outstanding common shares adjusted accordingly. It also assumes that outstanding common shares were increased by shares issuable upon exercise of those stock options for which market price exceeds the exercise price, less shares which couldwarrants have been purchased byexcluded from the Company withcalculation because their effect would be anti-dilutive. Therefore, the related proceeds. In periods of losses,weighted-average shares outstanding used to calculate both basic and diluted loss per share is computed onare the same basis asfor periods with a net loss.

On May 28, 2020, pursuant to the previously announced Merger Agreement, dated December 19, 2019, the Company issued prefunded common stock warrants to purchase 1,193,391 shares of the Company’s common stock to certain investors (“Penny Warrants”). Penny warrants were included in the calculation of outstanding shares for purposes of basic lossearnings per share asshare.

The following potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the inclusioncomputation of any other potentialdiluted weighted average shares outstanding as they would be anti-dilutive.

The following securities were excluded from weighted average diluted common shares outstanding because their inclusion would have been antidilutive.
F-15
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
 
As of December 31,
 
 
 
2019
 
 
2018
 
Common stock equivalents:
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock options
  380,396 
  302,773 
Series A, H-1, H-3, H-4, H-5, I, J, K and Merger common stock purchase warrants
  4,300,560 
  863,084 
Series H, H-3, H-4, H-5 Convertible Preferred Stock
  3,900,354 
  1,796,251 
Restricted shares (unvested)
  - 
  244,643 
Totals
  8,581,310 
  3,206,751 
anti-dilutive:

  As of December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Options to purchase Common Stock  1,920,269   996,645 
Unvested restricted stock  1,072,503   - 
Series H-1, H-3, H-4, H-5, I, J, pre-merger AYRO and Merger common stock purchase warrants  3,501,014   461,647 
Series H, H-3, H-6, and pre-merger AYRO Seed Preferred Stock  2,475   2,007,193 
   6,496,261   3,465,485 

Research and development costs net

Costs are incurred in connection with research and development programs that are expected to contribute to future earnings. Such costs include labor, stock-based compensation, training, software subscriptions, and consulting. These amounts are charged to the consolidated statement of operations as incurred, which is included in loss from operations from discontinued operations.incurred. Total research and development expenses included in loss from discontinued operations were $205,000$1,920,548 and $322,269$714,281 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2020, the FASB issuedASU 2020-10, Codification Improvements. The guidance contains improvements to the Codification by ensuring that all guidance that requires or provides an option for an entity to provide information in the notes to financial statements is codified in the Disclosure Section of the Codification. The guidance also contains Codifications that are varied in nature and 2018, respectively.

Adoptionmay affect the application of Newthe guidance in cases in which the original guidance may have been unclear. For public business entities, the amendments in the ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2021, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2022. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2020-10 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40); Accounting Standardsfor Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity (“ASU 2020-06”), which addresses issues identified as a result of the complexities associated with applying GAAP for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity. This update addresses, among other things, the number of accounting models for convertible debt instruments and convertible preferred stock, targeted improvements to the disclosures for convertible instruments and earnings-per-share (“EPS”) guidance and amendments to the guidance for the derivatives scope exception for contracts in an entity’s own equity, as well as the related EPS guidance. This update applies to all entities that issue convertible instruments and/or contracts in an entity’s own equity. This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, but no earlier than fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years. FASB specified that an entity should adopt the guidance as of the beginning of its annual fiscal year. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2020-06 could have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In FebruaryJune 2016, the FASB issued Accounting StandardsASU 2016-13 - Financial Instruments-Credit Losses-Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. Codification (ASC) 842, Leases, which requires lesseesImprovements to recognize most leasesTopic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, have been released in November 2018 (2018-19), November 2019 (2019-10 and 2019-11) and a January 2020 Update (2020-02) that provided additional guidance on their balance sheets as a right-of-use assetthis Topic. This guidance replaces the current incurred loss impairment methodology with a corresponding lease liability. Lessor accounting undermethodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. For SEC filers meeting certain criteria, the standardamendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. For SEC filers that meet the criteria of a smaller reporting company (including this Company) and for non-SEC registrant public companies and other organizations, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2022. Early adoption will be permitted for all organizations for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is substantially unchanged. Additional qualitativecurrently in the process of its analysis of the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements and quantitativedoes not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (ASC 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 removes certain disclosures, are also required.modifies certain disclosures and adds additional disclosures. The ASU is effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted the new standard on January 1, 2020, and the adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11—Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities From Equity (Topic 480), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features and II. Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception. ASU 2017-11 eliminates the requirement that a down round feature precludes equity classification when assessing whether an instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. A freestanding equity-linked financial instrument no longer would be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down round feature. The Company adopted the new standard on January 1, 2020, and the adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

F-15

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 3. REVENUES

Disaggregation of Revenue

Revenue by type consists of the following:

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Revenue type        
Product revenue $1,506,055  $787,386 
Shipping revenue  94,099   83,717 
Subscription revenue  1,786   11,883 
Service income  2,129   7,166 
  $1,604,069  $890,152 

Contract Liabilities

The Company recognizes a contract liability when a consideration is received, or if the Company has the unconditional right to receive consideration, in advance of satisfying the performance obligation. A contract liability is the Company’s obligation to transfer goods or services to a customer for which the Company has received consideration, or an amount of consideration is due from the customer. The table below details the activity in the Company’s contract liabilities as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. The balance at the end of each period is reported as contract liability in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

  As of December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Balance, beginning of year $-  $9,999 
Additions  183,319   - 
Transfer to revenue  (159,319)  (9,999)
Balance, end of period $24,000  $- 

Warranty Reserve

The Company records a reserve for warranty repairs upon the initial delivery of vehicles to its dealer network. The Company provides a product warranty on each vehicle including powertrain, battery pack and electronics package. Such warranty matches the product warranty provided by its supply chain for warranty parts for all unaltered vehicles and is not considered a separate performance obligation. The supply chain warranty does not cover warranty-based labor needed to replace a part under warranty. Warranty reserves include management’s best estimate of the projected cost of labor to repair/replace all items under warranty. The Company reserves a percentage of all dealer-based sales to cover an industry-standard warranty fund to support dealer labor warranty repairs. Such percentage is recorded as a component of cost of revenues in the statement of operations. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, warranty reserves were recorded within accrued expenses of $43,278 and $27,375, respectively.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET

Accounts receivable, net consists of amounts due from invoiced customers and product deliveries and were as follows:

  As of December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Trade receivables $839,679  $107,230 
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts  (73,829)  (36,084)
  $765,850  $71,146 

NOTE 5. INVENTORY, NET

Inventory, net consisted of the following:

  As of December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Raw materials $634,085  $554,913 
Work-in-progress  -   64,631 
Finished goods  539,169   498,972 
  $1,173,254  $1,118,516 

Management has determined that no reserve for inventory obsolescence was required as of the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

NOTE 6. PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

  As of December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Prepaid final assembly services $520,000  $- 
Prepayments for inventory  976,512   49,162 
Prepaid other  112,250   115,237 
  $1,608,762  $164,399 

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 7. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

Property and equipment, net consisted of the following:

  As of December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Computer and equipment $815,704  $520,586 
Furniture and fixtures  127,401   111,347 
Lease improvements  221,802   117,897 
Prototypes  300,376   490,798 
Computer software  62,077   54,516 
   1,527,360   1,295,144 
Less: Accumulated depreciation  (916,048)  (805,778)
  $611,312  $489,366 

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $332,615 and $615,707, respectively.

NOTE 8. INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET

Intangible assets, net consisted of the following:

  As of December 31, 2020 
           Weighted- 
        Net  Average 
  Gross  Accumulated  Carrying  Amortization 
  Amount  Amortization  Amount  Period 
Supply chain development $395,248  $(291,937) $103,311   1.05 yrs. 
Patents and trademarks  70,435   (29,901)  40,534   2.45 yrs. 
  $465,683  $(321,838) $143,845     

  As of December 31, 2019 
           Weighted- 
        Net  Average 
  Gross  Accumulated  Carrying  Amortization 
  Amount  Amortization  Amount  Period 
Supply chain development $395,248  $(193,126) $202,122   2.30 yrs. 
Patents  56,047   (14,044)  42,003   3.10 yrs. 
  $451,295  $(207,170) $244,125     

Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, was $114,668 and $106,859, respectively. The definite lived intangible assets have no residual value at the end of their useful lives.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of December 31, 2020, the intangible assets amortization expense to be recognized for each of the succeeding five years are as follows:

Years ending December 31, 

Future

Amortization Expense

 
2021 $108,924 
2022  24,601 
2023  8,568 
2024  1,752 
  $143,845 

NOTE 9. FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

The composition of the Company’s debt and financing obligations was as follows:

  As of December 31, 
  2020  2019 
2019 $500,000 Founder Bridge Note $-  $500,000 
2019 Vendor Payable Conversion Note  -   137,729 
2019 $1,000,000 Convertible Bridge Notes  -   1,000,000 
Note payable – auto financing  21,608   28,555 
   21,608   1,666,284 
Less: debt discount  -   (341,310)
   21,608   1,324,974 
Less: current portion  (7,548)  (1,006,947)
Long-term debt $14,060  $318,027 

Auto Financing

In August of 2018, the Company entered into an auto financing arrangement with an auto lender (“Auto Financing Note”) in the amount of $36,962. The Auto Financing Note carries a maturity date of August 31, 2023, at a 8.34% interest rate. Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, was $2,119 and $2,673, respectively.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financing arrangements settled during the periods presented are as follows:

2019 $500,000 Founder Bridge Note

In October 2019, the Company received $500,000 under a 120-day bridge term loan (the “Founder Bridge Note”), bearing interest at the rate of 14% per annum, payable quarterly, from Mark Adams, a founding board member. As an inducement for the bridge loan, the Company granted Mr. Adams 143,975 shares of common stock. On December 13, 2019, Mr. Adams agreed to modify the terms of the note and extend the maturity date until April 30, 2021 in exchange for the issuance of 136,340 shares of common stock. A discount on debt of $398,017 was recorded and amortized over the life of the loan as a component of interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The discount was calculated by allocating the relative fair value of the underlying equity grant, determined using the relative fair market value method to ascribe the value of the common stock at the time of the grant, relative to the face value of the loan to arrive at the total debt discount. On September 30, 2020, the Company repaid the Founder Bridge Note in full. The final amount paid was $517,405 consisting of $500,000 in principal and $17,405 in accrued interest. Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, was $52,500 and $13,386, respectively. Amortization expense on the discount on debt for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, was $103,602 and $100,722, respectively. The Company reported a loss on the debt extinguishment related to the unamortized discount on debt of $193,693.

2019 Vendor Payable Conversion Note

In December 2019, a marketing firm agreed to convert 90% of trade accounts payable the Company owed that firm to a term loan with a principal amount of $137,729 and bearing interest at the rate of 15% per annum, payable quarterly, with a maturity date of May 31, 2021. The Company also issued the marketing firm 17,997 shares of common stock in conjunction with this term loan. A discount on debt of $46,683 was recorded and amortized over the life of the loan as a component of interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The discount was calculated by allocating the relative fair value of the underlying equity issuance, determined using the relative fair market value method to ascribe the value of the common stock at the time of the issuance, relative to the face value of the loan to arrive at the total debt discount. On September 30, 2020, the Company repaid the conversion loan in full. The final amount paid was $143,454 consisting of $137,729 in principal and $5,725 in accrued interest. Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, was $15,494 and $9,302, respectively. Amortization expense on the discount on debt for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, was $24,008 and $2,668, respectively. The Company reported a loss on the debt extinguishment related to the unamortized discount on debt of $20,007.

2019 $1,000,000 Convertible Bridge Notes

In December of 2019, the Company received cash in exchange for convertible promissory notes from five institutional lenders totaling $1,000,000. The maturity date of the notes was the earlier of (1) the closing of the Merger, (2) May 31, 2020, and (3) ninety (90) days if the Company determined not to proceed with the Merger. The notes accrued interest at five percent (5%). Immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger, the outstanding principal was converted into 1,030,585 shares of common stock. Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, was $20,833 and $1,291, respectively.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2019 $800,000 Convertible Notes

During the first quarter of 2019, the Company received cash in exchange for convertible promissory notes from seven individual lenders, totaling $800,000. The terms for the notes were sixty (60) days with an additional sixty-day extension to be exercised at the discretion of the Company. The notes accrued interest at twelve (12%) for the first sixty days and at fifteen percent (15%) for the sixty-day extension. The lenders had the option to convert the notes and accrued interest into AYRO Seed Preferred Stock (see Note 10) at $1.75 per share before the sixty-day extension period has expired. In May 2019, four lenders converted $350,000 of principle and $9,062 of accrued interest into 205,178 of AYRO Seed Preferred Stock. In September 2019, one lender converted $100,000 of convertible notes to a twelve-month term loan (see 2019 $250,000 Bridge Notes). Additionally, two lenders redeemed $60,000 in principal from their outstanding note. Warrants to purchase up to 26,586 of common stock at a price of $7.33 per share were issued in connection with the notes. The warrants issued have a five-year life. A discount on debt related to the warrant issuance of $69,173 was recorded and was amortized over the life of the notes as a component of interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The discount was calculated by allocating the relative fair value of the underlying equity issuance, determined using the relative fair market value method to ascribe the value of the common stock at the time of the issuance, relative to the face value of the loan to arrive at the total debt discount. In December 2019, the remaining $290,000 in principal and associated accrued interest was converted to 343,482 shares of AYRO Seed Preferred Stock. Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, was $0 and $57,201, respectively. Amortization expense on the discount on debt for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, was $0 and $69,173, respectively.

2019 $250,000 Bridge Notes

During the third quarter of 2019, the Company received cash in exchange for term loans from five individual lenders, totaling $250,000. Additionally, one lender holding convertible debt, converted $100,000 in principal amount to a term loan (see 2019 $800,000 Convertible Notes). In the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company received cash of $75,000 in exchange for a term loan from an individual lender. The terms for the notes were for twelve months, with twelve percent (12%) interest payable quarterly. The Company issued 0.2880 shares of common stock to the lenders for each dollar borrowed for an aggregate of 122,379 shares of common stock. A discount on debt related to the common stock issuance of $187,675 was recorded and amortized over the life of the notes as a component of interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The discount was calculated by allocating the relative fair value of the underlying equity grant, determined using the relative fair market value method to ascribe the value of the common stock at the time of the grant, relative to the face value of the loan to arrive at the total debt discount. In December 2019, $425,000 of principal and associated interest were converted to 433,819 shares of AYRO Seed Preferred Stock.

2020 $500,000 Bridge Notes

In February 2020, the Company received cash in exchange for promissory notes from three institutional lenders totaling $500,000. The maturity date of the notes was the earlier of (1) the closing of the Merger, (2) May 31, 2020, and (3) ninety (90) days the Company determines not to proceed with the Merger. The notes accrued interest at seven percent (7%). Immediately after the consummation of the Merger, the notes were redeemed for cash. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $9,373.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2020 $600,000 Bridge Notes

In April 2020, the Company issued a secured promissory note payable to an individual investor providing $600,000 of short-term financing. The notes carried an interest rate of fifteen percent (15%) and were to be repaid upon the earlier of (1) closing date of the pending the Merger and (2) July 14, 2020. Fifty percent (50%) of the principal amount was personally guaranteed by Mark Adams, a former director of AYRO Operating and AYRO. In conjunction with the notes, 553,330 shares of common stock (276,665 shares of common stock representing two percent (2%) of the combined company’s post-merger outstanding common stock each) were issued to the lender and to Mr. Adams as compensation for his personal guarantee. A discount on debt of $462,013 was recorded in the transaction and was being amortized over the life of the note as a component of interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The discount was calculated by allocating the relative fair value of the underlying equity issuance, determined using the relative fair market value method to ascribe the value of the common stock at the time of the issuance, relative to the face value of the loan to arrive at the total debt discount. Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 was $10,233. Amortization expense for the discount on debt for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $108,788. The note was fully repaid upon closing of the Merger. The Company reported a loss on the debt extinguishment related to the unamortized discount on debt of $353,225.

2020 Paycheck Protection Program Term Note

In May 2020, the Company entered into a Paycheck Protection Program Term Note (the “PPP Note”) with Pacific Western Bank, NA in the amount of $218,000. The PPP Note was issued to the Company pursuant to the Coronavirus, Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act’s (the “CARES Act”) (P.L. 116-136) Paycheck Protection Program (the “Program”). The PPP Note carries a maturity date of May 20, 2022, at a 1% interest rate. On December 29, 2020, notice of the PPP Note forgiveness was granted to the Company. The forgiveness amount of $218,000 in principal and $1,363 in interest was recorded in the other income line item on the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020.

NOTE 10. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock

During the third quarter of 2019, the Company issued 122,379 shares of common stock in connection with the 2019 $250,000 Bridge Notes.

In October 2019, the Company issued 143,975 shares of common stock in connection with the 2019 $500,000 Founder Bridge Note.

In October 2019, the Company issued 231,778 shares of common stock in connection with the termination of the royalty-based agreement with Sustainability Initiatives, LLC (“SI”).

In December 2019, the Company issued 136,340 shares of common stock in connection with the extension of the 2019 $500,000 Founder Bridge Note.

In December 2019, the Company issued 434,529 shares of common stock in connection with the cancellation of 477,190 stock options originally granted with the amendment of the royalty agreement with Sustainability Initiatives, LLC.

In December 2019, the Company issued 67,488 shares of common stock in connection with the fee-for-service consulting agreement with Sustainability Consultants, LLC.

In December 2019, the Company issued 17,997 shares of common stock in connection with the conversion of outstanding accounts payable to a promissory note with a local marketing firm.

In April 2020, the Company issued 553,330 shares of common stock in connection with the issuance of the 2020 $600,000 Bridge Note.

On June 17, 2020, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain existing investors, pursuant to which the Company sold, in a registered public offering by the Company directly to the investors an aggregate of 2,200,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, at an offering price of $2.50 per share for gross proceeds of $5,500,000 before offering expenses of $435,000.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On July 6, 2020, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain existing investors, pursuant to which the Company sold, in a registered public offering by the Company directly to the investors an aggregate of 3,157,895 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, at an offering price of $4.75 per share for gross proceeds of $15,000,000 before offering expenses of $1,249,200.

On July 21, 2020, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain existing investors, pursuant to which the Company sold, in a registered public offering by the Company directly to the investors an aggregate of 1,850,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, at an offering price of $5.00 per share for gross proceeds of $9,250,000 before offering expenses of $740,000. Each purchaser also had the right to purchase, on or before October 19, 2020, additional shares of common stock (the “Additional Shares”) equal to the full amount of 75% of the common stock it purchased at the initial closing, or an aggregate of 1,387,500 shares, at price of $5.00 per share. On October 16, 2020, the Company entered into an addendum to the Agreement (the “Addendum”), which extended the deadline for each purchaser to exercise the right to purchase the Additional Shares by one year, to October 19, 2021. As of December 31, 2020, investors had elected to purchase 420,000 of the Additional Shares of common stock of AYRO, par value $0.0001 per share, at an offering price of $5.00 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $2,100,000 before offering expenses of $168,000.

On November 22, 2020, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain institutional and accredited investors, pursuant to which such stockholders agreed to purchase an aggregate of 1,650,164 shares of AYRO common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, at an offering price of $6.06 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $10,000,000 before the deduction of fees and offering expenses of $847,619.

During July 2020, the Company issued 225,590 shares of common stock from the conversion of 7,833 shares of Series H-6 Preferred Stock.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 5,074,645 shares of common stock from the exercise of 5,092,806 warrants and received net cash proceeds of $3,926,818.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 1,030,585 shares of common stock from the conversion of the 2019 $1,000,000 Convertible Bridge Notes – See Note 9.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 2,337,663 shares of common stock from the closing of the Merger in consideration for $3,060,740 of cash and equity of Merger Sub.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 1,573,218 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, for proceeds of $2,000,000 net of offering fees and expenses of $609,010, pursuant to Stock Purchase Agreements entered into on December 19, 2019 as a component of the Merger Agreement and contingent upon closing of the Merger.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 1,037,496 shares of common stock to advisors in connection with the Merger.

In December 2020, based on its contract, the Company agreed to issue 15,000 shares of common stock to Core IR, the Company’s investor relations firm. The shares were immediately vested and are unissued at December 31, 2020. An expense of $42,300 was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2020 in the general & administrative operating expenses in the Statements of Operations.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 2,007,193 shares of the common stock from the conversion of 7,360,985 AYRO Seed Preferred Stock.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 6,817 shares of common stock from the exercise of stock options and received cash proceeds of $16,669.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 795 shares of common stock from the conversion of 955 shares of H-3 Preferred Stock.

Restricted Stock

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 1,087,618 shares of restricted common stock of which 15,115 shares were vested, valued based on the stock price at the date of issuance with a weighted average price of $5.27 per share, pursuant to the AYRO, Inc. 2020 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The Company recognized compensation expense during the year ended December 31, 2020 of $772,411.

Preferred Stock

Upon closing of the Merger, the Company assumed the Series H, H-3 and H-6 preferred stock of DropCar, Inc., which respective conversion prices have been adjusted to reflect the May 2020 one-for-five reverse split.

Series H Convertible Preferred Stock

Under the terms of the Series H Certificate of Designation, each share of the Company’s Series H Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series H Preferred Stock”) has a stated value of $154.00 and is convertible into shares of the Company’s Common Stock, equal to the stated value divided by the conversion price of $184.80 per share (subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits or dividends). The Company is prohibited from effecting the conversion of the Series H Preferred Stock to the extent that, as a result of such conversion, the holder would beneficially own more than 9.99%, in the aggregate, of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock calculated immediately after giving effect to the issuance of shares of common stock upon such conversion. In the event of liquidation, the holders of the Series H Preferred Stock are entitled, pari passu with the holders of common stock, to receive a payment in the amount the holder would receive if such holder converted the Series H Preferred Stock into common stock immediately prior to the date of such payment. As of December 31, 2020, such payment would be calculated as follows:

Number of Series H Preferred Stock outstanding as of December 31, 2020  8 
Multiplied by the stated value $154.00 
Equals the gross stated value $1,232 
Divided by the conversion price $184.80 
Equals the convertible shares of Company Common Stock  7 
Multiplied by the fair market value of Company Common Stock as of December 31, 2020 $6.08 
Equals the payment $43 

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Series H-3 Convertible Preferred Stock

Pursuant to the Series H-3 Certificate of Designation (as defined below), the holders of the Company’s Series H-3 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series H-3 Preferred Stock”) are entitled to elect up to two members of a seven-member Board, subject to certain step downs; pursuant to the Series H-3 securities purchase agreement, the Company agreed to effectuate the appointment of the designees specified by the Series H-3 investors as directors of the Company.

Under the terms of the Series H-3 Certificate of Designation, each share of the Series H-3 Preferred Stock has a stated value of $138.00 and is convertible into shares of common stock, equal to the stated value divided by the conversion price of $165.60 per share (subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits and dividends). The Company is prohibited from effecting the conversion of the Series H-3 Preferred Stock to the extent that, as a result of such conversion, the holder or any of its affiliates would beneficially own more than 9.99%, in the aggregate, of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock calculated immediately after giving effect to the issuance of shares of common stock upon the conversion of the Series H-3 Preferred Stock.

In the event of liquidation, the holders of the Series H-3 Preferred Stock are entitled, pari passu with the holders of common stock, to receive a payment in the amount the holder would receive if such holder converted the Series H-3 Preferred Stock into common stock immediately prior to the date of such payment. As of December 31, 2020, such payment would be calculated as follows:

Number of Series H-3 Preferred Stock outstanding as of December 31, 2020  1,234 
Multiplied by the stated value $138.00 
Equals the gross stated value $170,292 
Divided by the conversion price $165.60 
Equals the convertible shares of Company Common Stock  1,028 
Multiplied by the fair market value of Company Common Stock as of December 31, 2020 $6.08 
Equals the payment $6,250 

Series H-6 Convertible Preferred Stock

On February 5, 2020, the Company filed the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series H-6 Preferred Stock (the “Series H-6 Certificate of Designation”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, establishing and designating the rights, powers and preferences of the Series H-6 Preferred Stock. The Company designated up to 50,000 shares of Series H-6 Preferred Stock and each share has a stated value of $72.00 (the “H-6 Stated Value”). Each share of Series H-6 Preferred Stock is convertible at any time at the option of the holder thereof, into a number of shares of common stock of the Company determined by dividing the H-6 Stated Value by the initial conversion price of $3.60 per share, which was then further reduced to $2.50 under the anti-dilution adjustment provision, subject to a 9.99% blocker provision. The Series H-6 Preferred Stock has the same dividend rights as the common stock, except as provided for in the Series H-6 Certificate of Designation or as otherwise required by law. The Series H-6 Preferred Stock also has the same voting rights as the common stock, except that in no event shall a holder of Series H-6 Preferred Stock be permitted to exercise a greater number of votes than such holder would have been entitled to cast if the Series H-6 Preferred Stock had immediately been converted into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to $3.60. In addition, a holder (together with its affiliates) may not be permitted to vote Series H-6 Preferred Stock held by such holder to the extent that such holder would beneficially own more than 9.99% of our common stock. In the event of any liquidation or dissolution, the Series H-6 Preferred Stock ranks senior to the common stock in the distribution of assets, to the extent legally available for distribution.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The holders of Series H-6 Preferred Stock are entitled to certain anti-dilution adjustments if the Company issues shares of its common stock at a lower price per share than the applicable conversion price of the Series H-6 Preferred Stock. If any such dilutive issuance occurs prior to the conversion of the Series H-6 Preferred Stock, the conversion price will be adjusted downward to a price that cannot be less than 20% of the exercise price of $3.60.

In the event of liquidation, the holders of the Series H-6 Preferred Stock are entitled, pari passu with the holders of common stock, to receive a payment in the amount the holder would receive if such holder converted the Series H-6 Preferred Stock into common stock immediately prior to the date of such payment. As of December 31, 2020, such payment would be calculated as follows:

Number of Series H-6 Preferred Stock outstanding as of December 31, 2020  50 
Multiplied by the stated value $72.00 
Equals the gross stated value $3,600 
Divided by the conversion price $2.50 
Equals the convertible shares of Company Common Stock  1,440 
Multiplied by the fair market value of Company Common Stock as of December 31, 2020 $6.08 
Equals the payment $8,755 

AYRO Series Seed Preferred Stock

Prior to the Merger, the Company was authorized to issue 8,472,500 shares of preferred stock, no par value, of which all were designated as Series Seed Preferred Stock. As of December 31, 2020, no shares of Series Seed Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding.

The Series Seed Preferred Stock was convertible at any time after issuance at the option of the holder into the Company’s Common Stock on a 1-for-1 basis, subject to any exchange ratios, reverse splits, or stock dividends. The Series Seed Preferred Stock was also subject to mandatory conversion provisions upon either (i) immediately prior to the closing of a firm commitment underwritten initial public offering pursuant to an effective registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended covering the offer and sale of the Company’s Common Stock; or, (ii) upon the receipt by the Company of a written request for such conversion from the holders of a majority of the Preferred Stock then outstanding. In the event the outstanding shares of Common Stock are subdivided (by stock split, stock dividend, reverse split or otherwise), the shares of Series Seed Preferred Stock will be adjusted ratably to maintain each share’s ownership percentage. The Series Seed Preferred Stock Stockholders are entitled to equal voting rights to common stockholders on an as-converted basis and receive preference to common stockholders upon liquidation. During the first half of 2019, 1,092,215 shares of Series Seed Preferred Stock were sold for $1.75 per share for a cash proceeds of $1,911,375. During the second quarter of 2019, 238,500 shares of Series Seed Preferred Stock were sold for $2.00 per share for a cash proceeds of $477,000. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2019, 205,178 shares of Series Seed Preferred Stock were issued from the conversion of $359,062 of debt and related interest – See Note 9. During the third quarter of 2019, 65,000 shares of Series Seed Preferred Stock were sold for $2.00 per share for a cash proceeds of $130,000. During the fourth quarter of 2019, 777,301 shares of Series Seed 3 Preferred Stock were issued at $1.00 per share in exchange for cancellation of $777,301 of notes payable and accrued interest. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2019, 1,100,000 shares of Series Seed 3 Preferred Stock were issued at $1.00 per share in exchange for cancellation of $1,100,000 of trade accounts payable from a single supplier. In conjunction with the Merger, all 7,360,985 shares of AYRO Series Seed Preferred Stock were converted into approximately 2,007,193 shares of the Company Common Stock after taking into account the Exchange Ratio, Reverse Stock Split and Stock Dividend.

F-26

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Warrants

AYRO Seed Warrants

Prior to the Merger, the Company issued 461,647 warrants (the “AYRO Seed Warrants”) with an exercise price $7.33. The AYRO Seed Warrants terminate five years from the grant date. As of December 31, 2020, there were 461,647 AYRO Seed Warrants outstanding. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company recorded warrant expense related to the AYRO Seed Warrants of $36,760 and $418,877, respectively.

Series I, J, H, H-1, H-3, H-4 and H-5 warrants transferred to AYRO common stock pursuant to the Merger.

Series I Warrants

As a result of the Merger, 14,636 Series I Warrants transferred to AYRO and have an exercise price of $69.00 per share. If at any time (i) the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of the Common Stock exceeds $138.00 for not less than the mandatory exercise measuring period; (ii) the daily average number of shares of Common Stock traded during the mandatory exercise measuring period equals or exceeds 25,000; and (iii) no equity conditions failure has occurred as of such date, then the Company shall have the right to require the holder to exercise all or any portion of the Series I Warrants still unexercised for a cash exercise. As of December 31, 2020, there were 14,636 outstanding.

Series H-1 Warrants

As a result of the Merger, 10,149 Series H-1 Warrants transferred to AYRO and have an exercise price $145.20 per share, subject to adjustments (the “Series H-1 Warrants”). Subject to certain ownership limitations, the Series H-1 Warrants are immediately exercisable from the issuance date and will be exercisable for a period of five (5) years from the issuance date. All 10,149 Series H-1 Warrants expired during the year ended December 31, 2020.

Series H-3 Warrants

As a result of the Merger, 2,800 Series H-3 Warrants transferred to AYRO and have an exercise price of $165.60 per share, subject to adjustments (the “Series H-3 Warrants”). Subject to certain ownership limitations, the Series H-3 Warrants are immediately exercisable from the issuance date and will be exercisable for a period of five (5) years from the issuance date. As of December 31, 2020, there were 2,800 Series H-3 Warrants outstanding.

Exercise of Series H-4 Warrants and Issuance of Series J Warrants

Series H-4 Warrants

As a result of the Merger, 37,453 Series H-4 Warrants transferred to AYRO and have an exercise price of $15.60. The Series H-4 Warrants contain an anti-dilution price protection and the warrants cannot be less than $15.60 per share. As of December 31, 2020, there were 37,453 Series H-4 Warrants outstanding.

F-27

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As a result of the Merger, 52,023 Series J Warrants transferred to AYRO. The terms of the Series J Warrants are substantially identical to the terms of the Series H-4 Warrants except that (i) the exercise price is equal to $30.00 per share, (ii) the Series J Warrants may be exercised at all times beginning on the 6-month anniversary of the issuance date on a cash basis and also on a cashless basis, (iii) the Series J Warrants do not contain any provisions for anti-dilution adjustment and (iv) the Company has the right to require the Holders to exercise all or any portion of the Series J Warrants still unexercised for a cash exercise if the volume-weighted average price (VWAP) (as defined in the Series J Warrant) for the Company’s common stock equals or exceeds $45.00 for not less than ten consecutive trading days.

If at any time (i) the VWAP of the Common Stock exceeds $9.00 for not less than the mandatory exercise measuring period; (ii) the daily average number of shares of Common Stock traded during the mandatory exercise measuring period equals or exceeds 25,000; and (iii) no equity conditions failure has occurred as of such date, then the Company shall have the right to require the holder to exercise all or any portion of the Series J Warrants still unexercised for a cash exercise. As of December 31, 2020, there were 52,023 Series J Warrants outstanding.

Series H-5 Warrants

As a result of the Merger, 296,389 Series H-5 Warrants were transferred to AYRO and have an exercise price of $2.50 per share. Subject to certain ownership limitations, the H-5 Warrants will be exercisable beginning six months from the issuance date and will be exercisable for a period of five years from the initial issuance date.

The H-5 Warrants are entitled to certain anti-dilution adjustments if the Company issues shares of its common stock at a lower price per share than the applicable exercise price (subject to a floor of $0.792 per share). An anti-dilution adjustment was triggered resulting in an adjusted exercise price per share from $3.96 to $2.50, resulting in an issuance of an additional 173,091 warrants that are exercisable at $2.50 per share. As of December 31, 2020, 121,004 Series H-5 Warrants were exercised in to 102,839 shares of the Company’s common stock, of which 76,999 Series H-5 Warrants were redeemed through a cashless exercise and 18,161 shares were cancelled, whereby the warrant holder did not pay cash for the shares but instead received the number of shares equal to the difference between the exercise price and the market price. As of December 31, 2020, 348,476 Series H-5 Warrants outstanding.

The Company considers the change in exercise price due to the anti-dilution trigger related to the Series H-5 Warrants to be of an equity nature, as the issuance allowed the warrant holders to exercise warrants in exchange for common stock, which represents an equity for equity exchange. Therefore, the change in the fair value before and after the effect of the anti-dilution triggering event and the fair value of the Series H-5 warrants will be treated as a deemed dividend in the amount of $432,727. Cash received upon exercise in excess of par value is accounted for through additional paid in capital. The Company valued the deemed dividend as the difference between: (a) the modified fair value of the Series H-5 Warrants in the amount of $967,143 and (b) the fair value of the original award prior to the modification of $534,416. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the date of the modification and issuance using the following assumptions: (a) fair value of common stock of $2.77 per share, (b) expected volatility of 89.96%, (c) dividend yield of 0%, (d) risk-free interest rate of 0.24%, and (e) expected life of 5 years. The Series H-5 Warrants were exercisable beginning June 6, 2020.

The Series I, H-1, H-3, H-4, J and H-5 Warrants expire through the years 2021-2024.

F-28

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Bridge Loan Warrants

In December of 2019, the Company entered in a convertible bridge loan with five institutional lenders totaling $1,000,000 (see Note 9). On May 28, 2020, immediately prior to the closing of the Merger, the five lenders received 1,030,585 warrants (the “Bridge Loan Warrants”) to purchase 1,030,585 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.1159 per share. The Bridge Loan Warrants have full ratchet anti-dilution price protection with respect to future issuances of securities at an effective price below the exercise price with the exercise price per share reducing to such exercise price and the number of shares deliverable upon exercise of the warrants increasing such that the aggregate exercise price under each warrant remains constant. The Bridge Loan Warrants terminate after a period of 5 years on May 28, 2025. As of December 31, 2020, all 1,030,585 of the Bridge Loan Warrants had been exercised.

Secured Loan Warrants

In February 2020, the Company entered into secured promissory notes with three institutional lenders totaling $500,000 (see Note 9). On May 28, 2020, immediately after the closing of the Merger, pursuant to and in connection with the issuance of the notes, the Company issued warrants (the “Secured Loan Warrants”) to purchase an aggregate of 100,000 shares of common stock to the three lenders for an aggregate additional purchase price of $10,000. As of December 31, 2020, 100,000 of the Secured Loan Warrants had been exercised.

AYRO Private Placement Warrants

On May 28, 2020, the Company entered into the first AYRO Operating Private Placement Stock Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) with current stockholders of the Company and AYRO Operating, pursuant to which such stockholders agreed to purchase, prior to the consummation of the Merger, shares of AYRO Operating Common Stock and 1,401,791 warrants (the “First Private Placement Warrants”) to purchase AYRO Operating’s common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1,150,000. Prior to the closing of the Merger, AYRO Operating issued to the investors party to this first AYRO Private Placement SPA (i) an aggregate of approximately 543,179 shares of common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase 429,305 shares of Company Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.000367 per share, and (ii) First Private Placement Warrants to purchase 972,486 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.3599 per share. The First Private Placement Warrants issued pursuant to the first AYRO Operating Private Placement SPA have full ratchet anti-dilution price protection with respect to future issuances of securities at an effective price below the exercise price with the exercise price per share reducing to such exercise price and the number of shares deliverable upon exercise of the warrant increasing such that the aggregate exercise price under each warrant remains constant. The First Private Placement Warrants terminate after a period of 5 years on May 28, 2025. As of December 31, 2020, all of the 1,401,791 First Private Placement Warrants had been exercised.

On May 28, 2020, the Company entered into the second AYRO Operating Private Placement SPA with current investors of the Company and AYRO Operating, pursuant to which such investors agreed to purchase, prior to the consummation of the Merger, shares of AYRO Operating Common Stock and 1,603,832 warrants (the “Second Private Placement Warrants”) to purchase AYRO Operating Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $850,000. On the closing date of the Merger, AYRO Operating issued to the investors party to this second AYRO Operating Private Placement SPA (i) an aggregate of approximately 1,030,039 shares of common stock and pre-funded warrants to purchase 286,896 shares of Company Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.000367 per share, and (ii) Second Private Placement Warrants to purchase 1,316,936 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.7423 per share. The Second Private Placement Warrants issued pursuant to the second AYRO Operating Private Placement SPA have full ratchet anti-dilution price protection with respect to future issuances of securities at an effective price below the exercise price with the exercise price per share reducing to such exercise price and the number of shares deliverable upon exercise of the warrant increasing such that the aggregate exercise price under each warrant remains constant. The Second Private Placement Warrants terminate after a period of 5 years on May 28, 2025. As of December 31, 2020, all of the 1,603,832 Second Private Placement Warrants had been exercised.

F-29

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Other AYRO Operating Warrants

At the effective time of the Merger, each AYRO Operating warrant that was outstanding and unexercised immediately prior to the effective time was converted pursuant to its terms and became a warrant to purchase Company Common Stock, including the following:

On May 28, 2020, the Company entered into Common Stock Purchase Warrant Agreements with Palladium Capital Advisors, LLC (“Palladium”) in connection with Palladium’s role as placement agent to AYRO Operating. The Common Stock Purchase Warrant Agreements included the right to purchase an aggregate of 232,404 shares of common stock, of which 72,142 have an exercise price per share of $1.1159, 68,076 have an exercise price per share of $1.3599, and 92,186 have an exercise price per share of $0.7423 and all of the above warrants terminate after a period of 5 years on May 28, 2025. As of December 31, 2020, all of the 232,404 Palladium warrants had been exercised.

On May 28, 2020, the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Warrant Agreement with an investor. The Common Stock Purchase Warrant Agreement included the right to purchase an aggregate 477,190 shares of common stock in connection with a nominal stock subscription agreement entered into on December 31, 2019. The warrants contained an exercise price of $0.000367 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2020, 477,190 warrants were exercised.

Other AYRO Warrants

On June 19, 2020, the Company agreed to issue finder warrants (the “June Finder Warrants”) to purchase 27,273 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $2.75 per share to a finder or its designees, and the Company agreed to issue warrants to Palladium (the “June Placement Agent Warrants”) to purchase 126,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $2.875 per share. The June Finder Warrants and June Placement Agent Warrants terminate after a period of 5 years on June 19, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, 126,000 of the June Placement Agent Warrants had been exercised. As of December 31, 2020, the 27,273 June Finder Warrants were outstanding.

On July 8, 2020, the Company agreed to issue finder warrants (the “July 8 Finder Warrants”) to purchase 71,770 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $5.225 per share to a finder or its designees, and the Company agreed to issue warrants to Palladium (the “July 8 Placement Agent Warrants”) to purchase 147,368 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $5.4625 per share. The July 8 Finder Warrants and July 8 Placement Agent Warrants terminate after a period of 5 years on July 8, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, there were 71,770 July 8 Finder Warrants and 147,368 July 8 Placement Agent Warrants were outstanding.

On July 22, 2020, the Company agreed to issue warrants to Palladium (the “July 22 Placement Agent Warrants”) to purchase 129,500 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $5.750 per share. The July 22 Placement Agent Warrants terminate after a period of 5 years on July 22, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, there were 129,500 July 22 Placement Agent Warrants outstanding.

On September 25, 2020, the Company issued a warrant (the “September Warrant”) to purchase 31,348 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $3.19 per share to a vendor for facilitating a manufacturing agreement. The September Warrant is immediately exercisable and expires on September 25, 2025. The September Warrant was classified as equity and the estimated fair value of $2.13 per share was computed as of September 25, 2020 using the Black-Scholes model. The Company recorded $66,845 as stock-based compensation expense for the total fair value of the September Warrant. As of December 31, 2020, there were 31,348 September Warrants outstanding. The following assumptions were used to determine the fair value of the September Warrants:

 As of September 25, 2020 
Dividend            -%
Risk Free Rate  0.30%
Stock Price $2.90 
Strike Price $3.19 
Term  5.00 
Volatility  102%

F-30

On November 22, 2020, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with new and current stockholders of the Company, pursuant to which such stockholders agreed to purchase shares of AYRO’s Common Stock, Series A Warrants and Series B Warrants to purchase AYRO’s Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $9,999,997. Each purchaser additionally purchased and received Series A Warrants and Series B Warrants equal to 75% and 50% of the purchased shares, for a total of 1,237,624 Series A Warrants and 825,084 Series B Warrants. The Series A Warrants are immediately exercisable, in whole or in part at a strike price of $8.09 and terminate six months from the date of issuance on May 24, 2021. The Series B Warrants are immediately exercisable, in whole or in part, at a strike price of $8.90, and terminate five years from the date issuance on November 24, 2025. As of December 31, 2020, there were 1,237,624 Series A Warrants and 825,084 Series B Warrants outstanding.

On November 22, 2020, the Company agreed to issue finder warrants (the “November Finder Warrants”) to purchase 56,256 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $6.6660 per share to a finder or its designees, and the Company agreed to issue warrants to Palladium (the “November Placement Agent Warrants”) to purchase 57,756 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $6.9690 per share. The November Finder Warrants and November Placement Agent Warrants terminate after a period of 5 years on November 22, 2025. As of December 31, 2020, there were 56,256 November Finder Warrants and 57,756 November Placement Agent Warrants were outstanding.

A summary of the Company’s warrants to purchase common stock activity is as follows:

  Shares Underlying Warrants  Weighted Average Exercise Price  Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years) 
Outstanding at December 31, 2018  128,977  $7.33   4.22 
Granted  332,670  7.33     
Exercised  -         
Cancellations  -         
Forfeitures  -         
Outstanding at December 31, 2019  461,647  $7.33   4.22 
Assumed as part of the Merger  413,450  14.11     
Granted  7,728,872  3.2     
Exercised  (5,092,806) 0.86     
Expired  (10,149) 145.2     
Outstanding at December 31, 2020  3,501,014  $8.03   2.87 

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 11. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

AYRO 2020 Long Term Incentive Plan

On May 28, 2020, the Company’s shareholders approved the AYRO, Inc. 2020 Long Term Incentive Plan for future grants of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance and other awards.

The Company has reserved a total of 4,089,650 shares of its common stock pursuant to the AYRO, Inc. 2020 Long-Term Incentive Plan, including shares of restricted stock that have been issued. The Company has 2,051,537 stock options, restricted stock and warrants remaining under this plan as of December 31, 2020.

AYRO 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan

Prior to the Merger, the Company granted stock options and warrants pursuant to the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan effective January 1, 2017. As of December 31, 2020, the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan remains active, but no additional awards may be granted.

DropCar Amended and Restated 2014 Equity Incentive Plan

The DropCar Amended and Restated 2014 Equity Incentive Plan was amended in 2018 to increase the number of shares of Company common stock available for issuance. Pursuant to the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), 141,326 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance and there are options to purchase 61,440 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, there were zero shares available for grant under the 2014 Plan.

Stock-based compensation, including stock options, warrants and restricted stock, expense is included in the consolidated statement of operations as follows:

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Research and development $65,433  $(40,828)
Sales and marketing  160,480   46,723 
General and administrative  1,601,095   3,366,831 
Total $1,827,008  $3,372,726 

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Options

The following table reflects the stock option activity:

  Number of Shares  Weighted Average Exercise Price  Contractual Life (Years) 
          
Outstanding at December 31, 2018  899,844  $2.45   5.80 
Granted  890,300   3.54     
Exercised  -   -   - 
Cancellations  (477,190)  3.08     
Forfeitures  (316,309)  3.08     
Outstanding at December 31, 2019  996,645  $2.92   5.73 
Assumed as part of the Merger  61,440   46.95     
Granted  896,269   3.06     
Exercised  (6,817)  (2.45)    
Forfeitures  (27,268)  (2.86)    
             
Outstanding at December 31, 2020  1,920,269  $4.40   8.66 

Of the outstanding options, 975,388 were vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2020. At December 31, 2020 the aggregate intrinsic value of stock options vested and exercisable was $2,997,456.

The Company recognized $908,533 and $286,722 of stock option expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Total compensation cost related to non-vested stock option awards not yet recognized as of December 31, 2020 was $1,973,286 and will be recognized on a straight-line basis through the end of the vesting periods through October 2023. The amount of future stock option compensation expense could be affected by any future option grants or by any forfeitures.

Determining the appropriate fair value of the stock-based awards requires the input of subjective assumptions, including the fair value of the Company’s common stock, and for stock options, the expected life of the option, and the expected stock price volatility. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value its stock option awards. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock-based awards represent management’s best estimates and involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if factors change and management uses different assumptions, stock-based compensation expense could be materially different for future awards.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company uses the following inputs when valuing stock-based awards.

  As of December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Expected life (years)  5.0   5.0 
Risk-free interest rate  0.38%  1.62%
Expected volatility  89.76%  73.20%
Total grant date fair value $1.83 to $2.81  $3.45 

The expected life of the employee stock options was estimated using the cumulative-effect adjustment transition“simplified method, which applies” as the provisionsCompany has no historical information to develop reasonable expectations about future exercise patterns and employment duration for its stock option grants. The simplified method is based on the average of the standard atvesting tranches and the effective date without adjustingcontractual life of each grant. The expected life of awards that vest immediately use the comparativecontractual maturity since they are vested when issued. For stock price volatility, the Company uses public company comparable data and in periods presented.prior to the Merger historical private placement data as a basis for its expected volatility to calculate the fair value of option grants. The Company adopted all practical expedients and elected the following accounting policies related to this standard:

● 
Short-term lease accounting policy election allowing lessees to not recognize right-of-use assets and liabilities for leasesrisk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury notes with a term approximating the expected life of 12the option at the grant-date.

Restricted Stock

The following table reflects the restricted stock activity:

  Number of Shares  

Weighted

Average Grant Price

 
       
Outstanding at December 31, 2019  -  $0 
Granted  1,087,618   5.27 
Vested  (15,115)  (3.17)
         
Outstanding at December 31, 2020  1,072,503  $5.30 

In September 2020, the Company issued 436,368 shares of restricted stock to current directors, of which 15,115 immediately vested and the remainder to vest in December 2020, which was subsequently modified to vest in full in May 2021. In December of 2020, The Company recognized compensation expense during the year ended December 31, 2020 of $548,679. Total compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock not yet recognized as of December 31, 2020 was $834,608 and will be recognized on a straight-line basis through the end of the vesting periods through May of 2021.

In December 2020, based on objectives achieved, the Company issued 651,250 shares of restricted stock that vest according to the following vesting schedule: one-third will vest on May 28, 2021, one-third will vest on December 4, 2021 and one-third will vest on December 4, 2022. Compensation expense for the Keller Restricted Stock of $223,732 was recognized for the year ended December 31, 2020. Total compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock not yet recognized as of December 31, 2020 was $4,126,618 and will be recognized on a straight-line basis through the end of the vesting periods through December 22, 2022.

F-34

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Other Share-Based Payments

Warrants: The Company grants stock warrants pursuant to the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) effective January 1, 2017. The Company measured consultant stock-based awards at grant-date fair value and recognizes contractor consulting expense for contractor warrants on a straight-line method basis over the vesting period of the award. Grants to consultants are expensed at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the service provider to earn the equity instrument is reached and (ii) the date at which the service provider’s performance is complete.

The Company recognized $103,764 and $448,608 of warrant expense related to consulting services for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Stock Grants

The Company recognized $42,300 and $2,637,396 of stock grant expense related to services for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

In December 2020, based on its contract, the Company issued 15,000 shares of restricted stock to Core IR, the Company’s investor relations firm. The shares were immediately vested and are unissued as of December 31, 2020. An expense of $42,300 was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2020 in the general & administrative operating expenses in the Statements of Operations.

In October 2019, the Company granted 231,778 shares of the Company’s common stock to Sustainability Initiatives, LLC, an entity controlled by two of the Company’s founding board members as compensation for the termination of the consulting agreement with that entity. Stock-based compensation of $908,650 was recorded in the transaction.

In October 2019, the Company granted 143,975 shares of the Company’s common stock to Mark Adams, a founding board member, as consideration in providing a $500,000 150-day term loan to the Company. In December 2019, the Company granted an additional 136,340 shares of the Company’s common stock to Mr. Adams as consideration for extending the term date of the loan to April 30, 2021. A discount on debt of $398,017 was recorded in the transaction.

In December 2019, the Company granted 434,529 shares of the Company’s common stock to Sustainability Initiatives, LLC and two of the Company’s founding board members as compensation for cancelling options to purchase 447,190 shares of the Company’s common stock. Stock-based compensation of $1,496,343 was recorded in the transaction.

In December 2019, The Company granted 67,488 shares of common stock as compensation for consulting services to Sustainability Consultants, LLC, an entity that is controlled by Mark Adams, Will Steakley and John Constantine, who are principal stockholders of the Company. Stock-based compensation of $232,403 was recorded in the transaction.

The Company measures stock grants at grant-date fair value and recognizes contractor consulting expense on a straight-line method basis over the vesting period of the award. Grants to non-employees are expensed at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the service provider to earn the equity instrument is reached and (ii) the date at which the service provider’s performance is complete. The fair value of the stock grants was determined based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock as determined by an independent third-party valuation firm.

F-35

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 12. CONCENTRATIONS AND CREDIT RISK

Revenues

In March 2019, the Company entered into a five-year Master Procurement Agreement, or the MPA, with Club Car for the sale of AYRO’s four-wheeled vehicle. The MPA grants Club Car the exclusive right to sell AYRO’s four-wheeled vehicle in North America, provided that Club Car orders at least 500 vehicles per year. The MPA has an initial term of five (5) years commencing January 1, 2019 and may be renewed by Club Car for successive one-year periods upon 60 days’ prior written notice. As such, one customer accounted for approximately 68% and 75% of the Company’s revenues for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

In 2020, the Company phased-out the production of its 311 line of vehicles in order to develop a new line of vehicles. The change in production did not represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the Company’s operations or financial results.

Accounts Receivable

One customer accounted for approximately 74% and 69% of the Company’s gross accounts receivable for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Purchasing

The Company places orders with various suppliers. During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, multiple suppliers accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s raw materials. One supplier, Cenntro Automotive Group (“Cenntro”), a related party – see Note 13 – accounted for approximately 54% and 66%, respectively, of the Company’s purchases of raw materials. Another supplier accounted for approximately 11% during 2020 and a third supplier accounted for approximately 14% in 2019. Any disruption in the operation of this supplier could adversely affect the Company’s operations. Additionally, the Company is dependent on the manufacturing license it has with Cenntro. If the Company fails to comply with its obligations in the agreement with Cenntro, it could lose the ability to manufacture its vehicles.

Manufacturing

Cenntro owns the design of the AYRO 411 model and has granted the Company an exclusive license to manufacture AYRO 411 model for sale in North America. The Company’s business is dependent on such license, and if it fails to comply with its obligations to maintain that license, the Company’s business will be substantially harmed. Under the Manufacturing License Agreement, dated April 27, 2017, between Cenntro and the Company, the Company is granted an exclusive license to manufacture and sell AYRO 411 in the United States, and the Company required to purchase the minimum volume of product units from Cenntro, among other obligations.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Supply Chain Agreements

In 2017, the Company executed a supply chain contract with Cenntro Automotive Group (“Cenntro”), the Company’s primary supplier, a manufacturer located in the People’s Republic of China. Prior to the Merger, Cenntro was a significant shareholder in AYRO Operating. Through the partnership, Cenntro acquired 19% of AYRO Operating’s common stock. Cenntro beneficially owned approximately 4.38% of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2020. Cenntro owns the design of the AYRO 411 Fleet vehicles and has granted the Company an exclusive license to purchase the AYRO 411 Fleet vehicles for sale in North America. Currently, the Company purchases 100% of its vehicle chassis, cabs and wheels through this supply chain relationship with Cenntro. The Company must sell a minimum number of units in order to maintain its exclusive supply chain contract. The Company was in default of the original exclusive term of the contract; however, in 2019, the contract was amended to remove the default clause. In December 2019, Cenntro, agreed to convert $1,100,000 of trade accounts payable due from the Company to 299,948 shares of the Company’s Seed Preferred Stock. The parties also agreed that there would be a forgiveness of any accrued interest on the trades payable as a result of this conversion, which resulted in a recapture of interest expense for the Company in the amount of $168,169 in the year ended December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the amounts outstanding to Cenntro as a component of accounts payable were $44,592 and $83,955, respectively. Under a memo of understanding signed between the Company and Cenntro on March 22, 2020, the Company agreed to purchase 300 units within the following twelve months of signing the memo of understanding, and 500 and 800 in each of the following respective twelve-month periods. On July 9, 2020, in exchange for certain percentage discounts for raw materials, the Company made a $1.2 million prepayment for inventory. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the prepayment deposits were $976,512 and $49,162.

Other

The Company had received short-term expense advances from its founders. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the amounts outstanding were $15,000 for each year and recorded as a component of accounts payable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

In October 2019, the Company received $500,000 and issued a term loan from a founding board member. Furthermore, the Company granted 143,975 shares of the Company’s common stock as of December 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company granted an additional 136,340 shares of the Company’s common stock to as consideration for extending the term date of the loan to April 30, 2021. This note and accrued interest were paid in full in September 2020, see 2019 $500,000 Founder Bridge Note – Note 9.

On March 1, 2017, the Company entered into a royalty-based agreement with Sustainability Initiatives, LLC (“SI”) an entity that is controlled by certain Company board members in the effort to accelerate the Company’s operations. Royalties accrued were included as a component of research and development expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. In return for acceleration assistance and for serving the Chief Visionary Officer role, the agreement provided for a monthly retainer of $6,000 per month. On a quarterly basis, the Company remitted a royalty percentage (see table below) of company revenues less the retainer amounts.

RevenuesRoyalty Percentage
$0 - $25,000,0003%
$25,000,000 - $50,000,0002%
$50,000,000 - $100,000,0001%
Over $100,000,0010.5%

Effective January 1, 2019, the Company agreed to an amendment with SI to reduce the royalty percentage to 0.5%. In relation to this amendment, the Company granted the SI members an additional 381,752 stock options to vest over a nine-month vesting term. On October 15, 2019, the Company and the SI members agreed to terminate the agreement in full in exchange for 231,778 shares of the Company’s common stock. Stock-based compensation of $908,650 was recorded on the transaction in October 2019.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On December 9, 2019, the Company and the SI members agreed to cancel the outstanding options to purchase 477,190 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for 434,529 shares of the Company’s common stock. Stock-based compensation of $1,496,343 was recorded for the transaction in December 2019.

On April 1, 2017, the Company entered into a fee-for-service agreement with SI. In return for accounting, marketing, graphics and other services, the Company pays fixed, market-standard hourly rates under the shared services agreement as services are rendered. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had a balance outstanding to SI for $12,150 for both periods included in accounts payable. Total expenses were $0 and $61,275 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

In January 2019, the Company entered into a fee-for-service consulting agreement with Sustainability Consultants, LLC, an entity that is controlled by principal stockholders of the Company. In exchange for consulting services provided, the Company paid $189,238 in consulting fees to the firm during the first half of 2019. Additionally, the Company granted warrants to purchase 177,924 shares of the Company’s common stock. The warrants have an exercise price of $7.33 per share with a five-year life. Stock-based compensation consulting expense of $260,733 was recorded in the general and administrative expenses on the statement of operations in the fourth quarter of 2019 in conjunction with the warrant grant. The Company also granted 67,488 shares of the Company’s common stock and recorded stock-based compensation of $232,403 in the general and administrative expenses on the statement of operations for the fourth quarter of 2019 related to the common stock transaction.

NOTE 14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease Agreements

In 2019, the Company entered into a new lease agreement for office and manufacturing space. The lease commencement date was January 16, 2020. Prior to the commencement date of the new lease agreement, the Company leased other office and manufacturing space on a short-term basis. Total rent expense paid for the short-term lease in January 2020 only was $26,265. The Company determined if an arrangement is a lease at inception of the contract and whether a contract is or less;

● 
contains a lease by determining whether it conveys the right to control the use of identified asset for a period of time. The optioncontact provides the right to not separatesubstantially all the economic benefits from the use of the identified asset and the right to direct use of the identified asset, as such, the contract is, or contains, a lease. In connection with the adoption of ASC 842, Leases, the Company has elected to treat the lease and non-lease components for equipment leases.
● 
The packageas a single component.

Leases were classified as an operating lease at inception. An operating lease results in the recognition of practical expedients applied to all of its leases, including (i) not reassessing whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (ii) not reassessinga Right-of-Use (“ROU”) assets and lease liability on the lease classification for any expired or existing leases,balance sheet. ROU assets and (iii) not reassessing initial direct costs for any existing leases.

Right-of-use assets andoperating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term as of the commencement date. Because the lease does not provide an explicit or implicit rate of return, the Company determines an incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the commencement date for leases exceeding 12 months. Minimumin determining the present value of lease payments include onlyon an individual lease basis. The incremental borrowing rate for a lease is the fixedrate of interest the Company would have to pay on a collateralized basis to borrow an amount equal to the lease component ofpayments for the agreement.
asset under similar term, which is 10.41%. Lease expense for the lease is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company’s operating leases dolease does not provide an implicit rate that can readily be determined. Therefore,contain any residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants. Leases with a lease term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the Company uses a discount rate based on its incremental borrowing rate.

Operatingbalance sheet and lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The remaining term and is included in cost of sales and general and administrative expenses. Amortization expense for finance (capital) leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and is included in cost of sales or general and administrative expenses, while interest expense for finance leases is recognized using the effective interest method.
Adoption of this standard resulted in the recognition of operating lease right-of-use assets of approximately $23,000 (including a reclassification from prepaid expenses of a prepaid lease approximating $9,500) and corresponding lease liabilities of approximately $13,500 on the consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2019.December 31, 2020 is six years. The standard did not materially impact operating results or liquidity. Disclosures related to the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases are included in Note 7, Lease Agreements.
In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies the accounting for nonemployee share-based payment transactions. The amendments specify that Topic 718 applies to all share- based payment transactions in which a grantor acquires goods or services to be used or consumed in a grantor’s own operations by issuing share-based payment awards. The guidance was adopted effective January 1, 2019, and the adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
F-16
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or other standard setting bodies. Unless otherwise discussed, the Company believes that the impact of recently issued standards that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations upon adoption.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Changes to Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurements, which will improve the effectiveness of disclosure requirements for recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The standard removes, modifies, and adds certain disclosure requirements, and is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020. The adoption of ASU 2018-13 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
4.            
Discontinued Operations and Disposition of Operating Segments
DropCar Operating
On December 19, 2019, the Company entered into the Asset Purchase Agreement to sell substantially all of the assets associated with the DropCar Operating business. Operating results forcurrently has no finance leases.

For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018cash paid for the DropCar Operating business are presented as discontinued operations and the assets and liabilities classified as held for sale are presented separatelyamounts included in the balance sheet.

A breakdownmeasurement of lease liabilities - operating cash flows from operating lease were $84,747 and $0, respectively. Total lease expense is allocated to selling general and administration expense and cost of goods sold. The components of lease expense (within different expense groupings) consist of the discontinued operations is presented as follows:
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2019
 
 
2018
 
SERVICE REVENUES
 $4,579,745 
 $6,077,667 
COST OF REVENUE
  4,172,320 
  7,863,673 
GROSS PROFIT (LOSS)
  407,425 
  (1,786,006)
 
    
    
OPERATING EXPENSES
    
    
   Research and development
  205,000 
  322,269 
   General and administrative
  2,245,394 
  9,119,772 
   Depreciation and amortization
  395,081 
  354,657 
     TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
  2,845,475 
  9,796,698 
 
    
    
     OPERATING LOSS
  (2,438,050)
  (11,582,704)
 
    
    
Other income, net
  12,827 
  - 
Interest expense, net
  - 
  (409,082)
 
    
    
LOSS FROM DROPCAR DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
  (2,425,223)
  (11,991,786)
INCOME FROM SUISUN CITY DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
  - 
  315,119 
   LOSS FROM OPERATIONS OF DISCONTINUED COMPONENTS
  (2,425,223)
  (11,676,667)
LOSS ON SALE OF SUISUN CITY COMPONENT
  - 
  (4,169,718)
     LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
 $(2,425,223)
 $(15,846,385)
F-17
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notesfollowing:

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2020 
Operating lease expense $229,457 
Short-term lease expense  87,848 
Total lease cost $317,305 

Balance sheet information related to Consolidated Financial Statements

Assets and liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale included the following:
 
 
December 31,
 
 
 
2019
 
 
2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash
 $81,457 
 $415,569 
Accounts receivable, net
  210,671 
  295,626 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
  83,058 
  107,768 
     Current assets held for sale
 $375,186 
 $818,963 
 
    
    
Property and equipment, net
 $25,723 
 $39,821 
Capitalized software costs, net
  410,261 
  659,092 
Operating lease right-of-use asset
  1,886 
  - 
Other assets
  3,525 
  3,525 
     Noncurrent assets held for sale
 $441,395 
 $702,438 
 
    
    
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
  737,862 
  1,033,489 
Deferred revenue
  302,914 
  253,200 
Current liabilities held for sale
 $1,040,776 
 $1,286,689 
Suisun City Operations
On December 10, 2018, the Company signed a definitive agreement with a private corporation and completed the sale on December 24, 2018, of 100% of the corporate capital of Suisun City Operations, a wholly owned subsidiary of DropCar, Inc, for a total cash consideration of $3.5 million. The Company recognized the following loss on sale of component on the date of sale:
Sales price
$3,500,000
Commissions and various transaction costs
(332,220)
Net sales proceeds
3,167,780
Carrying amounts of assets, net of liabilities
7,337,498*
Loss on sale of Suisun City Operations
$(4,169,718)
* The carrying amounts of assets included cash of $1,504,366; accounts receivable and contract asset of $4,177,568; prepaid expenses and other current assets of $57,486; property and equipment of $295,206; intangibles and goodwill of $5,048,247; carrying amounts of liabilities included accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $3,688,831 and loans of $56,544.
The operations and cash flows of the Suisun City Operations were eliminated from ongoing operations following its sale. The operating results of the Suisun City Operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 were as follows:
Revenues
$13,730,252
Cost of revenues
10,836,754
Gross profit
2,893,498
Selling, general and administrative expenses
2,285,661
Depreciation and amortization
287,830
Total Operating Expenses
2,573,491
Interest expense, net
4,888
Net income from discontinued operations
$315,119

F-18
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5.Capitalized Software
Capitalized software costs included in non-current assets held for saleleases consists of the followingfollowing:

  As of December 31, 2020 
Assets    
Operating lease – right-of-use asset $1,098,819 
Total lease assets $1,098,819 
     
Liabilities    
Current liabilities:    
Lease obligation – operating lease $123,139 
Noncurrent liabilities:    
Lease obligation - operating lease, net of current portion  1,002,794 
Total lease liability $1,125,933 

The weighted-average remaining lease term and discount rate is as follows:

Weighted average remaining lease term (in years) – operating lease6.25
Weighted average discount rate – operating lease10.41

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Cash flow information related to leases consists of the following:

  As of December 31, 2020 
Operating cash flows for operating leases $84,747 
Supplemental non-cash amounts of lease liabilities arising from obtaining right of use assets $1,210,680 

Future minimum lease payment under non-cancellable lease as of December 31, 20192020 are as follows:

As of December 31, 2020 Operating Leases 
2021 $234,628 
2022  240,985 
2023  247,533 
2024  254,277 
2025  261,228 
Thereafter  313,302 
Total minimum lease payments  1,551,953 
Less effects of discounting  (426,020)
Present value of future minimum lease payments $1,125,933 

Manufacturing Agreements

On September 25, 2020, AYRO entered into a Master Manufacturing Services Agreement with Karma Automotive, LLC. The term of the contract is for 12 months. Pursuant to the agreement Karma will provide certain manufacturing services, starting in 2021, under an attached statement of work including final assembly, raw material storage and 2018:

 
 
As of December 31,
 
 
 
2019
 
 
2018
 
Software
 $1,467,008 
 $1,324,275 
Accumulated amortization
  (1,056,747)
  (665,183)
Total
 $410,261 
 $659,092 
 
    
    
Amortizationlogistical support of our vehicles in return for compensation of $1,160,800. The Company paid Karma an amount of $520,000 and issued warrants to an advisor to the transaction with a fair value of $66,845 due at signing of the contract. The payment was recorded as prepaid expense for the years endedas of December 31, 2019 and 2018, was $391,564 and $350,385, respectively and included in loss from discontinued operations.
6.Convertible Notes Payable
During2020. Pursuant to the year ended December 31, 2017,Manufacturing Services Agreement, the Company paid cash of $75,000 and issued convertible notes totaling $4,840,000 and warrantsa warrant (the “September Warrants”) to acquire 146,358purchase 31,348 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $59.04$3.19 per share in connection with the convertible notes (the “Notes”).to a vendor for facilitating a manufacturing agreement. The Notes all had a maturity date of one year from the date of issuance,September Warrant is immediately exercisable and accrued interest at a rate of 6% per annum, compounded annually. The Notes were convertible at $35.40 per share and, including accrued interest, were converted into 141,303 shares of common stock in connection with the Merger.
In connection with the Merger, the holders of the Notes entered into lock-up agreements pursuant to which they have agreed not to sell the 85,573 shares of common stock received in the Merger. The length of the lock-up period is up to 120 days. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded $672,144 as interest expense in relation to the lock-up agreements in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
At December 31, 2018, the aggregate carrying value of the Notes was $0. The Notes were fully converted during the year ended December 31, 2018.
7.Commitments and Contingencies
Lease Agreements
The Company leases office space in New York City and Buenos Aires, Argentinaexpires on a month-to-month basis, with a condition of a 60-day notice to terminate. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, rent expense for the Company’s New York City and Buenos Aires offices was approximately $58,000 and $158,000, respectively, and included in loss from discontinued operations.
September 25, 2025.

Litigation

The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, which arise in the ordinary course of business, that it believes are incidental to the operation of its business. While the outcome of these claims cannot be predicted with certainty, management does not believe that the outcome of any of these legal matters will have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial positions or cash flows.

In

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Other

On February 2018,12, 2021, the Company was servedentered into an Amended Summonsagreement with Arcimoto, Inc. to settle certain patent infringement claims (the “Arcimoto Settlement”) for a deminimis amount, pursuant to which the Company agreed to cease the production, importation and Complaint in the Supreme Courtsale of the CityAYRO 311, among other things. Accordingly, the Company would not be contractually permitted to resume production of New York, Bronx county originally served solely on an individual, the Company’s former customer, for injuries sustained by plaintiffs alleging such injuries were caused by either the customer, the Company’s valet operating the customer’s vehicle or an unknown driver operating customer’s vehicle.AYRO 311. The Company to date has cooperated withis continuing the NYC Police Department and no charges have been brought against anydevelopment of its employees. Thean all-new, three-wheeled electric vehicle, which the Company has referred the matterintended to replace AYRO 311 as its insurance carrier. As of June 12, 2019, this case was settled by the insurance carrier.

F-19
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Other
three-wheeled electric vehicle product offering.

As of January 1, 2018, the Company2019, DropCar Operating, Inc. (“DropCar”) had accrued approximately $96,000$232,000 for the settlement of multiple employment disputes. During the year ended December 31, 2018, approximately $70,000 of this amount was settled upon payment. An additional $207,000 was expensed as loss from operations of discontinued components and accrued as accounts payable and accrued expenses for settlements during the year ended December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2018,2020, approximately $232,000 remained$3,500 remained accrued as accounts payable and accrued expenses for the settlement of the final remaining employment disputes. During the year ended December 31, 2019, approximately $186,000 of this amount was settled upon payment. For the year ended December 31, 2019 $108,000 was expensed as loss from operations of discontinued components and accrued as accounts payable and accrued expenses for settlements and $20,000 was recorded as a reduction in loss from operations of discontinued components for the reversal of previously accrued settlements. As of December 31, 2019, approximately $134,000 remains accrued as accounts payable and accrued expenses for the settlement of employment disputes. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company has entered into multiple settlement agreements with former employees for which it has agreed to make monthly settlement payments which were paid during the year ended December 31, 2019.

dispute.

On March 23, 2018, DropCar was made aware of an audit being conducted by the New York State Department of Labor (“DOL”) regarding a claim filed by an employee. The DOL is investigating whether DropCar properly paid overtime for which DropCar has raised several defenses. In addition, the DOL is conducting its audit to determine whether the Company owes spread of hours pay (an hour’s pay for each day an employee worked or was scheduled for a period over ten hours in a day). If the DOL determines that monies are owed, the DOL will seek a backpay order, which management believes will not, either individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on DropCar’sthe Company’s business, consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. DuringManagement believes the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company expensed as loss from operations of discontinued components approximately $273,000 and $60,000, respectively, in relation to these matters. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Companycase has accrued as accounts payable and accrued expenses approximately $333,000 and $60,000, respectively, in relation to these matters.

The Companyno merit.

DropCar was a defendant in a class action lawsuit which resulted in a judgement entered into whereby the Company is required to pay legal fees in the amount of $45,000 to the plaintiff’s counsel. As of and for the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, the Companybalance due remains $45,000, recorded $45,000 as currenta component of accounts payable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. In addition, this amount was included in the $186,000 of prefunded liabilities held for sale and loss from operations of discontinued components.

8. Income Taxes
assumed by AYRO in the Merger – See Note 1.

NOTE 15. INCOME TAXES

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company files corporatedifference between the tax benefit derived by applying the Federal statutory income tax returnsrate to net losses and the benefit recognized in the United States (federal) and in New York. The Company is subject to federal, state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities from inception.

At December 31, 2019, the Company has approximately $17,233,000 of operating loss carryforwards for both federal and state tax purposes that may be applied against future taxable income. The net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in the year 2037 if not utilized prior to that date. Net operating losses generated after 2017 are limited to 80% of current years income and can be carried forward indefinitely. There is no provision for income taxes because the Company has historically incurred operating losses and maintains a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance increased by approximately $1,206,000 and $5,619,000 during the years 2019 and 2018, respectively, and was approximately $9,885,000 and $8,679,000 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
A reconciliation of the statutory U.S. Federal rate to the Company's effective tax rateconsolidated financial statements is as follows:
 
 
December 31,
 
 
 
2019
 
 
2018
 
Federal income tax benefit at statutory rate
  21.00%
  21.00%
State income tax, net of federal benefits
  5.44%
  7.80%
Permanent items
  (0.01)%
  (9.88)%
Return to Provision
  (1.85)%
  -%
Other
  -%
  0.49%
Change in valuation allowance
  (24.58)%
  (19.41)%
Provision for income taxes
  - 
  - 
F-20
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The

  December 31, 2020  December 31, 2019 
Benefit derived by applying the Federal statutory income rate to net losses before income taxes $(2,260,323) $(1,819,586)
State Tax Provision  (379,115)  9,728 
Permanent differences and other  (101,870)  (297,702)
Expense attributable to change in valuation allowances  2,741,308   2,107,559 
  $  $ 

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax effect of temporary differencesassets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that gave rise to significantsome portion or all of the deferred tax assets were as follows:

 
 
December 31,
 
 
 
2019
 
 
2018
 
Net operating loss carryforwards - Federal
 $3,619,000 
 $2,785,000 
Net operating loss carryforwards - State
  2,115,000 
  1,827,000 
Stock based compensation
  1,470,000 
  1,335,000 
Capital loss carryforward
  2,721,000 
  2,776,000 
Capitalized Software
  (148,000)
  (182,000)
Settlement reserve
  140,000 
  122,000 
Depreciation and amortization
  (50,000)
  1,000 
Allowance for doubtful accounts
  18,000 
  15,000 
Valuation allowance
  (9,885,000)
  (8,679,000)
Net deferred tax assets
 $- 
 $- 
An adjustment was made to the opening balancewill not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets amountingis dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and projections for future taxable income over periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible. Management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize the benefits of these deductible differences. A valuation allowance has been applied to $2 millionthe amount of deferred tax assets Management expects will be unrealized.

Management does not believe that there are significant uncertain tax positions in 2020. There are no interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in 2020.

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Deferred income taxes reflect the tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial accounting purposes and the amounts used for income tax reporting. Significant components of the Company’s net deferred tax assets are as follows:

  December 31, 2020  December 31, 2019 
Deferred Tax Assets:        
Net Operating Losses $4,346,179  $2,117,530 
Intangible Assets  65,759   24,937 
Nonqualified Stock Options  1,435,982   989,201 
Lease Liability  275,339    
Basis of Property and Equipment  108,918   119,179 
Other  28,686    
Deferred Tax Assets: $6,260,863  $3,250,847 
         
Deferred Tax (Liabilities):        
ROU Asset  (268,708) $ 
Deferred Tax (Liabilities):  (268,708)   
         
Valuation allowance  5,992,155   3,250,847 
Net deferred tax asset/(liability) $  $ 

Due to the uncertainty surrounding the realization of the benefits of its favorable tax attributes in future tax returns, the Company has placed a valuation allowance against all of its otherwise recognizable net deferred tax asset.

The Company’s net operating losses and other tax attributes that were not previously reported.loss carryforward totaling $17,840,842 at December 31, 2020 expires beginning 2035. The assets are subject to full valuation allowance.


The federal andCompany’s state net operating loss may be subject tocarryforward totaling $12,757,935 at December 31, 2020 which have indefinite lives.

Federal and state laws impose substantial restrictions on the limitations providedutilization of NOL carryforwards in the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Sections 382 and 383. The net operating loss andevent of an ownership change for income tax credit carryforwards are subject to review by the Internal Revenue Servicepurposes, as defined in accordance with the provisions of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Under this Internal Revenue Code section, substantial changes(“IRC”). Pursuant to IRC Section 382, annual use of the Company’s NOL carryforwards may be limited in the Company’s ownership may limit the amount of net operating loss carryforwards that could be utilized annually in the future to offset the Company’s taxable income. Specifically, this limitation may arise in the event of a cumulative change in ownership of the Company of more than 50% occurs within a three-year period. Any such annualThe Company has not completed an IRC Section 382 analysis regarding the limitation may significantly reduceof NOL carryforwards.

However, it is possible that past ownership changes will result in the utilizationinability to utilize a significant portion of the Company’s net operatingNOL carryforward that was generated prior to any change of control. The Company’s ability to use its remaining NOL carryforwards may be further limited if the Company experiences an IRC 382 ownership change in connection with future changes in the Company’s stock ownership.

Certain deferred tax assets from DropCar, Inc. such as NOL carryforwards and capital loss carryforwards before they expire. The closing ofhave are not included in the Company’s merger alone or together with transactions that have occurred or that may occur in the future, may trigger an ownership change pursuantdeferred tax assets as they are expected to Sectionbe fully limited under IRC. Sec. 382 which could limit the amount of net operating loss carryforwards that could be utilized annually in the future to offset the Company’s taxable income, if any. Any such limitation as thea result of the Company’s additional sales of common stock by the Company could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations in future years.merger.

F-43
There are no liabilities from unrecognized tax benefits included in the Company's consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and therefore the Company has not incurred any penalties or interest.
9.            
Stockholders’ Equity
Common Stock

AYRO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On January 18, 2018, the Company sold 10,057 shares of common stock for proceeds of $300,000.

On January 30, 2018, the Company converted $3,682,502, the net carrying value of the principal balance of $4,840,000 convertible notes payable, into 136,785 shares of common stock just prior to the WPCS Merger.
On April 19, 2018, the Company entered into separate Warrant Exchange Agreements with the holders of existing warrants issued in the WPCS Merger to purchase shares of common stock, pursuant to which, on the closing date, the Merger Warrant Holders exchanged each Merger Warrant for 1/18 of a share of common stock and 1/12 of a warrant to purchase a share of common stock. In connection with the Exchange Agreements, the Company issued an aggregate of (i) 48,786 new shares of common stock and (ii) Series I Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 73,178 shares of common stock. The Company valued (a) the stock and warrants issued in the amount of $972,368, (b) the warrants retired in the amount of $655,507, and (c) recorded the difference as deemed dividend in the amount of $316,861. See below under “Warrants” for further details.
F-21
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company converted $159,584 of accrued interest related to the convertible notes into 4,518 shares of common stock.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company granted 3,333 shares of common stock to a service provider and recorded $31,800 as general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
On September 4, 2018, the Company issued 260,116 shares of common stock from the exercise of Series H-4 Warrants.
On December 17, 2018, the Company issued 14,653 shares of common stock from the conversion of 224 shares of Series H-4 Convertible Preferred Stock. 
On March 26, 2019, the Company25, 2021, AYRO entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain existinginstitutional and accredited investors, pursuant to which the Company sold,AYRO agreed to issue and sell in a registered publicdirect offering by the Company directly to the investors(the “January 2021 Offering”) an aggregate of 478,4693,333,334 shares of common stock of AYRO, par value $0.0001 per share, at an offering price of $4.18$6.00 per share, for gross proceeds of $1,985,001 netapproximately $20.0 million before the deduction of fees and offering expenses of $15,000.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued 1,412,420expenses. Each purchaser was also granted a warrant to purchase, between July 26, 2021 and July 26, 2023, additional shares of common stock from the conversion of 21,591 shares of Series H-4 Convertible Preferred Stock.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company granted 116,666 shares of common stock to a service provider and recorded $222,200 stock based compensation as a part of general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued 277,778 shares of common stock from the exercise of Series K Warrants and received cash proceeds of $16,667.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued 31,646 shares of common stock to a director and recorded $25,000 stock based compensation as part of general and administrative expenses in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Concurrently and upon vesting, the Company paid $9,857 of personal withholding taxes for the grantee and reserved 12,477 shares of common stock as consideration for the cash paid which was immediately retired.
Preferred Stock
In accordance with the amended and restated certificate of incorporation, there are 5,000,000 authorized preferred shares at a par value of $ 0.0001.

F-22
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Series Seed
On January 30, 2018, the Company converted 275,691 shares of Series Seed Preferred Stock into 45,949 shares of common stock in connection with the WPCS Merger.
Series A
On January 30, 2018, the Company converted 611,944 shares of Series A Preferred Stock into 101,991 shares of common stock in connection with the WPCS Merger.
Series H Convertible Preferred Stock
On January 30, 2018, in accordance with the WPCS Merger the Company issued 8 shares of Series H Convertible Preferred Stock.
Under the terms of the Series H Certificate of Designation, each share of Series H Preferred Stock has a stated value of $154 and is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock (“common stock”(the “Additional Shares”), equal to the stated value divided byfull amount of the conversioncommon stock it purchased at the initial closing, or an aggregate of 3,333,334 shares (“Investor Warrants”), at an exercise price of $36.96$6.93 per share (subjectshare. The Investor Warrants are exercisable six months following issuance and terminate two and a half years following issuance and are exercisable at an exercise price of $6.93 per share.

Palladium Capital Group, LLC (“Palladium”) is acting as the placement agent for the January 2021 Offering. AYRO will pay Palladium a fee equal to adjustment in the event of stock splits or dividends). The Company is prohibited from effecting the conversion8.0% of the Series H Preferredgross proceeds of the offering. Additionally, AYRO issued Palladium a warrant to purchase 233,334 shares of Common Stock to the extent that, as a result(which equals 7.0% of such conversion, the holder would beneficially own more than 9.99%, in the aggregate of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock calculated immediately after giving effect to the issuancenumber of shares of common stock upon such conversion.

InCommon Stock placed in the event of liquidation, the holders of the Series H Preferred Stock are entitled, pari passuOffering (the “Palladium Warrants” and together with the holders of common stock, to receive a payment inInvestor Warrants, the amount the holder would receive if such holder converted the Series H Preferred Stock into common stock immediately prior to the date of such payment. As of December 31, 2019, such payment would be calculated as follows at December 31, 2019:
Number of Series H Preferred Stock outstanding
8
Multiplied by the stated value
$154
Equals the gross stated value
$1,232
Divided by the conversion price
$36.96
Equals the convertible shares of common stock
33
Multiplied by the fair market value of common stock at December 31, 2019
$0.88
Equals the payment
$29
Series H-1 and H-2 Convertible Preferred Stock
The Company has designated 9,488 Series H-1 Preferred Stock and designated 3,500 Series H-2 Preferred Stock, none of which are outstanding.
Series H-3 Convertible Preferred Stock
On January 30, 2018, in accordance with the WPCS Merger the Company issued 2,189 shares of Series H-3 Convertible Preferred Stock.
Also, pursuant to the Series H-3 Certificate of Designation (as defined below), the holders of the Series H-3 Shares are entitled to elect up to two members of a seven member Board, subject to certain step downs; pursuant to the Series H-3 Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to effectuate the appointment of the designees specified by the Series H-3 Investors as directors of the Company.
On March 30, 2017, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware a Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights with respect to the Series H-3 Shares (the “Series H-3 Certificate of Designation”“Warrants”).
Under the terms of the Series H-3 Certificate of Designation, each share of the Series H-3 Shares has a stated value of $138 and is convertible into shares of common stock, equal to the stated value divided by the conversion price of $33.12 per share (subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits and dividends). The Company is prohibited from effectingPalladium Warrants will have the conversion ofsame terms as the Series H-3 Shares to the extent that, as a result of such conversion, the holder or any of its affiliates would beneficially own more than 9.99%, in the aggregate, of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock calculated immediately after giving effect to the issuance of shares of common stock upon the conversion of the Series H-3 Shares.
F-23
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
In the event of liquidation, the holders of the Series H-3 Preferred Stock are entitled, pari passu with the holders of common stock, to receive a payment in the amount the holder would receive if such holder converted the Series H-3 Preferred Stock into common stock immediately prior to the date of such payment. As of December 31, 2019, such payment would be calculated as follows at December 31, 2019:
Number of Series H-3 Preferred Stock outstanding
2,189
Multiplied by the stated value
$138
Equals the gross stated value
$302,082
Divided by the conversion price
$33.12
Equals the convertible shares of common stock
9,121
Multiplied by the fair market value of common stock at December 31, 2019
$0.88
Equals the payment
$8,026
Series H-4 Convertible Preferred Stock
Investor Warrants.

On March 8, 2018, the CompanyFebruary 11, 2021, AYRO entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain institutional and accredited investors, pursuant to which the Company issued to the investors an aggregate of 25,472 shares of the Company’s Series H-4 Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Series H-4 Shares”) convertible into 424,533 shares of common stock of the Company, and warrants to purchase 424,533 shares of common stock of the Company, with an original exercise price of $15.60 per share (the “H-4 Exercise Price”), subject to adjustments (the “Series H-4 Warrants”). The purchase price per Series H-4 Shares and Series H-4 Warrant was $235.50, equal to (i) the closing price of the Common Stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on March 7, 2018, plus $0.125 multiplied by (ii) 100. The aggregate purchase price for the Series H-4 Shares and Series H-4 Warrants was approximately $6.0 million. Subject to certain ownership limitations, the Series H-4 Warrants are immediately exercisable from the issuance date and are exercisable for a period of five years from the issuance date.

On March 8, 2018, the Company filed the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series H-4 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of Designation”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, establishing and designating the rights, powers and preferences of the Series H-4 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series H-4 Stock”). The Company designated up to 30,000 shares of Series H-4 Stock and each share has a stated value of $235.50 (the “Stated Value”). Each share of Series H-4 Stock is convertible at any time at the option of the holder thereof, into a number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the Stated Value by the original conversion price of $14.13 per share (the “Conversion Price”), subject to a 9.99% blocker provision. The Series H-4 Stock has the same dividend rights as the Common Stock, and no voting rights except as provided for in the Certificate of Designation or as otherwise required by law. In the event of any liquidation or dissolution of the Company, the Series H-4 Stock ranks senior to the Common Stock in the distribution of assets, to the extent legally available for distribution.
The holders of Series H-4 Stock are entitled to certain anti-dilution adjustments if the Company issues shares of its common stock at a lower price per share than the applicable conversion price of the Series H-4 Stock. If any such dilutive issuance occurs prior to the conversion of the Series H-4 Stock, the conversion price will be adjusted downward to a price equal to the issuance (subject to a floor of $2.826 per share). On August 31, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement with certain investors to exercise Series H-4 Warrants and issue Series J warrants which resulted in a reduced conversion price of $3.60 per share for the Series H-4 Stock. See “Exercise of Series H-4 Warrants and Issuance of Series J Warrants” below. On December 6, 2019, the Company entered into Series H-5 securities purchase agreement, causing the Conversion Price to decrease from $3.60 per share to $2.826 per share. As a result, the Company recorded a deemed dividend of $55,853 which represents the fair value transferred to the Series H-4 shareholders from the anti-dilution protection being triggered. The deemed dividend was recorded as an increase to accumulated deficit and increase in additional paid-in capital and reduced net income available to common shareholders by the same amount. The Company valued (a) the fair value of the Series H-4 Shares immediately before the re-pricing in the amount of $203,927, (b) the fair value of the Series H-4 Shares immediately after the re-pricing in the amount of $259,780, and (c) recorded the difference as deemed dividend in the amount of $55,853. The Series H-4 Shares were valued at fair market value on the date of the exchange using the following assumptions: (a) the stated value of $1,184,094 divided by the conversion price of $3.60 multiplied by the fair market value per shares of $0.62 results in $203,927, and (b) stated value $1,184,094 divided by the conversion price of $2.826 multiplied by the fair market value of $0.62 per shares results in $259,780. See “Issuance of Series H-5 Warrants”.
If at any time (i) the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of the Common Stock exceeds $35.10 for not less than ten (10) consecutive Trading Days (the “Mandatory Exercise Measuring Period”); (ii) the daily average number of shares of Common Stock traded during the Mandatory Exercise Measuring Period equals or exceeds 25,000; and (iii) no equity conditions failure has occurred as of such date, then the Company shall have the right to require the holder to exercise all or any portion of the Series H-4 Warrants still unexercised for a cash exercise.
In the event of liquidation, the holders of the Series H-4 Preferred Stock are entitled, pari passu with the holders of common stock, to receive a payment in the amount the holder would receive if such holder converted the Series H-4 Preferred Stock into common stock immediately prior to the date of such payment. As of December 31, 2019, such payment would be calculated as follows at December 31, 2019:
Number of Series H-4 Preferred Stock outstanding
5,028
Multiplied by the stated value
$235.50
Equals the gross stated value
$1,184,094
Divided by the conversion price
$2.826
Equals the convertible shares of common stock
419,000
Multiplied by the fair market value of common stock at December 31, 2019
$0.88
Equals the payment
$368,720
On November 15, 2018, the initial conversion price of Series H-4 Shares was adjusted upon obtaining stockholder approval in accordance with Nasdaq rules and regulations which resulted in the 25,475 Series H-4 Shares being convertible into 1,666,490 shares of common stock of the Company.
On December 17, 2018, an investor converted 224 shares of Series H-4 into 14,653 shares of Common Stock.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, investors converted 21,591 shares of Series H-4 Stock into 1,412,420 shares of Common Stock.
F-24
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Series H-5 Convertible Preferred Stock
On December 6, 2019, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with investors pursuant to which the Company issued to the investors an aggregate of 34,722 shares of the Company’s newly designated Series H-5 Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Series H-5 Stock”) convertible into 3,472,200 shares of common stock of the Company. The purchase price per Series H-5 Stock was $72.00, equal to (i) the closing price of the Common Stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on December 5, 2019, plus $0.125 multiplied by (ii) 100. The aggregate purchase price for the Series H-5 Stock was approximately $2.5 million.
December 6, 2019, the Company filed the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series H-5 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “H-5 Certificate of Designation”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, establishing and designating the rights, powers and preferences of the Series H-5 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series H-5 Stock”). The Company designated up to 50,000 shares of Series H-5 Stock and each share has a stated value of $72.00 (the “Stated Value”). Each share of Series H-5 Stock is convertible at any time at the option of the holder thereof, into a number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the Stated Value by the conversion price of $0.72 per share, subject to a 9.99% blocker provision. The Series H-5 Stock has the same dividend rights as the Common Stock, and no voting rights except as provided for in the Certificate of Designation or as otherwise required by law. In the event of any liquidation or dissolution of the Company, the Series H-5 Stock ranks senior to the Common Stock in the distribution of assets, to the extent legally available for distribution.
The holders of Series H-5 Stock are entitled to certain anti-dilution adjustments if the Company issues shares of its common stock at a lower price per share than the applicable conversion price of the Series H-5 Stock. If any such dilutive issuance occurs prior to the conversion of the Series H-5 Stock, the conversion price will be adjusted downward to a price that cannot be less than 20% of the exercise price or $0.1584.
In the event of liquidation, the holders of the Series H-5 Preferred Stock are entitled, pari passu with the holders of common stock, to receive a payment in the amount the holder would receive if such holder converted the Series H-5 Preferred Stock into common stock immediately prior to the date of such payment. As of December 31, 2019, such payment would be calculated as follows at December 31, 2019:
Number of Series H-5 Preferred Stock outstanding
34,722
Multiplied by the stated value
$72.00
Equals the gross stated value
$2,499,984
Divided by the conversion price
$0.72
Equals the convertible shares of common stock
3,472,200
Multiplied by the fair market value of common stock at December 31, 2019
$0.88
Equals the payment
$3,055,536
As described in Note 11, on February 5, 2020, the Company entered into Exchange Agreement with the holders of existing Series H-5 Stock to exchange an equivalent number of shares of its Series H-6 Stock. The Exchange closed on February 5, 2020. The purpose of the exchange was to include voting rights.
Stock Based Compensation
Amended and Restated 2014 Equity Incentive Plan
The Company has one equity incentive plan, the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), with 706,629 shares of common stock reserved for issuance. As of December 31, 2019, there were 49,943 shares available for grant under the Company’s equity plan. The Plan was amended in 2018 to increase the number of shares of common stock available for issuance thereunder by 285,417, which amendment was approved by the Company’s stockholders on November 15, 2018.
Service Based Restricted Stock Units and Common Stock
On February 28, 2018, the Company issued 244,643 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to two members of management. On March 26, 2019, the Board of Directors, with the consent of the grantees, agreed to amend the vesting period for the RSUs issued on February 28, 2018 to vest in full on May 17, 2019. The RSUs were valued using the fair market value of the Company’s closing stock price on the date of grant totaling $3,243,966, which was amortized over the original vesting period. On June 6, 2019, the Company issued 244,643 shares of common stock upon vesting of the RSUs. Upon vesting, the Company paid $183,333 of personal withholding taxes for the grantees and reserved 120,658 shares of common stock as consideration for the cash paid which was immediately retired.
On July 30, 2019, the Board of Directors approved of certain modification to directors compensation. As consideration for services to the Board the Chairman of the Board received (i) an annual cash retainer equal to $90,000 and, as compensation for the period from February 1, 2019 through January 31, 2020, a grant of shares of restricted stock in an amount equal to $60,000 and (ii) each non-Chairman member of the Board receives an annual cash retainer equal to $30,000 and, as compensation for the period from February 1, 2019 through January 31, 2020, a grant of shares of restricted stock in an amount equal to $50,000, each to be paid as determined by the Compensation Committee.
F-25
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Due to the limited number of shares available for grant pursuant to the DropCar, Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, the restricted stock grants referred to in the forgoing paragraph could not be granted in full in fiscal 2019. The Company issued 31,646 shares of common stock to one board member; 132,913 vested shares were not issued. On November 14, 2019 the board of directors modified the terms to convert the grant to a contingent payment payable upon a merger or change in control within twelve months. Upon a merger or change in control, the board of directors will have the option to satisfy the director payments in the form of cash or equity, if available. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded $237,855 as general and administrative expense related to this grant, of which $25,000 was recorded as stock-based compensation. From this grant, the Company issued 31,646 shares on August 27, 2019 to one grantee and recognized a total of $25,000 as a credit to additional paid in capital for restricted stock units issued to the board of directors. The balance of the accrual is recorded and carried forward through accounts payable and accrued expenses.
Service Based Common Stock
On January 30, 2018 the Company issued 213,707 and 35,558 and shares of common stock to Alpha Capital Anstalt and Palladium Capital Advisors, respectively, in connection with the WPCS Merger. For the Alpha Capital Anstalt issuance, the Company recorded 90% of the issuance or 192,336 common shares as cost of capital raise and 10% of the issuance or 21,371 common shares as advisory services. The merger costs in the amount of $1,510,722 were recorded as a reduction to additional paid in capital and the advisory service costs in the amount of $167,858 were recorded as general and administrative expense in the consolidated statement of operations. For the Palladium Capital Advisors issuance, the Company recorded $279,327 as general and administrative expense in the consolidated statement of operations.
Service Based Warrants
On March 8, 2018, in connection with the financing discussed above, the Company issued 1,371 Series H-4 Shares and 22,850 common stock warrants to a service provider. The Company valued these warrants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following inputs: exercise price of $15.60; fair market value of underlying stock of $13.20; expected term of 5 years; risk free rate of 2.63%; volatility of 120.63%; and dividend yield of 0%. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded the fair market value of the Series H-4 Shares and warrants as an increase and decrease to additional paid in capital in the amount of $568,648 as these services were provided in connection with the sale of the Series H-4 shares.
Consulting Agreement
The Company entered into a two-month consulting agreement with a vendor to receive public relations services beginning on December 24, 2018. The compensation terms are $20,000 cash payment and 33,333 shares of common stock. In accordance with ASC 505, the shares were valued as of December 31, 2018, the reporting date. The Company recorded $61,318 and $6,982 as sales and marketing expense in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company paid the cash upon entering the agreement and issued the shares of common stock upon completion of the contract in February 2019.
Modification Expense
The Company modified 60,516 options that were subject to expiration within 90 days following the sale of Suisun City Operations for WPCS employees, during the year ended December 31, 2018. The Company extended the expiration date in accordance with the options’ original terms. The Company recorded a modification expense related to the extension of the expiration date and recorded $74,109 as a selling, general and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 as part of discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of operations. The expense was based on the change in the fair value before and after the modification using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of the modification using the following assumptions: pre-modification (a) exercise prices of $28.56 to $633.60, (b) fair value of common stock $2.40, (c) expected volatility of 231%, (d) dividend yield of 0%, (e) risk-free interest rate of 2.45%, (f) expected life of 0.25 years; and post-modification (a) exercise prices of $285.56 to $633.60, (b) fair value of common stock $2.40, (c) expected volatility of 152%, (d) dividend yield of 0%, (e) risk-free interest rate of 2.62% to 2.69%, (f) expected life of 6.02 years to 8.35 years.
F-26
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Employee and Non-employee Stock Options
On January 30, 2019, the Company issued options to purchase 99,072 shares of common stock to two members of management. The options vest quarterly over two years and have an exercise price of $2.32 per share. The options were valued at $213,444, in the aggregate, on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options pricing model and amortized over the vesting period.
The following table summarizes stock option activity during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
 
 
Shares Underlying Options
 
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price
 
 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)
 
 
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2018
  - 
  - 
  - 
  - 
Acquired in Merger
  133,711 
 $36.42 
  3.88 
  - 
Granted
  214,239 
  5.58 
  9.72 
  - 
Forfeited
  (45,178)
  11.64 
  - 
  - 
Outstanding at December 31, 2018
  302,772 
  18.3 
  7.20 
  - 
Granted
  99,072 
  2.32 
  9.09 
  - 
Forfeited
  (21,448)
  13.09 
  - 
  - 
Outstanding at December 31, 2019
  380,396 
 $14.43 
  6.84 
  - 
At December 31, 2019, unamortized stock compensation for stock options was approximately $131,693, with a weighted-average recognition period of 1.07 years.
At December 31, 2019, outstanding options to purchase 317,381 shares of common stock were exercisable with a weighted-average exercise price per share of $16.78.
The following table sets forth total non-cash stock-based compensation for common stock, RSUs, options and warrants issued to employees and non-employees by operating statement classification for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
 
 
Year ended December 31,
 
 
 
2019
 
 
2018
 
Selling, general and administrative
 $280,275 
 $82,436 
Loss from operations of discontinued components, net of taxes
  338,854 
  3,711,084 
Total
 $619,129 
 $3,793,520 
Stock option pricing model
The fair value of the stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options pricing model with the following assumptions:

 
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
 
 
2019
 
 
2018
 
Fair value of common stock $
  2.32 
 $1.62 - 13.26 
Expected volatility
  151.76%
  118.10% - 151.79%
Dividend yield
  - 
  - 
Risk-free interest
  2.70%
  2.79% - 3.00%
Expected life (years)
  5.5 
  5.13 - 5.50 

F-27
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Warrants
Merger Warrants and Warrant Exchange
The warrants to purchase common stock (the “Merger Warrants”) issued in connection with the convertible debt in 2017 are fully vested and exercisable for five years through November 14, 2021. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following inputs: exercise price of $59.04; fair market value of underlying stock of $16.68 and $17.40; expected term of 5 years; risk free rate of 1.61%, 1.70%, and 2.01%; volatility of 161%, 147%, and 150%; and a dividend yield of 0.00%. The Company accounted for these warrants as debt discount. The Company recorded amortization of $176,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018.
On April 19, 2018, the Company entered into separate Warrant Exchange Agreements (the “Exchange Agreements”) with the holders (the “Merger Warrant Holders”) of existing warrants issued in the Merger (the “Merger Warrants”) to purchase shares of common stock, pursuant to which, on the closing date, the Merger Warrant Holders exchanged each Merger Warrant for 1/18 of a share of common stock and 1/12 of a warrant to purchase a share of common stock (collectively, the “Series I Warrants”). The Series I Warrants have an exercise price of $13.80 per share. In connection with the Exchange Agreements, the Company issued an aggregate of (i) 48,786 new shares of common stock and (ii) Series I Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 73,178 shares of common stock. The Company valued (a) the stock and warrants issued in the amount of $972,368, (b) the warrants retired in the amount of $655,507, and (c) recorded the difference as deemed dividend in the amount of $316,861. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of the exchange using the following assumptions: (a) fair value of common stock $10.32, (b) expected volatility of 103% and 110%, (c) dividend yield of 0%, (d) risk-free interest rate of 2.76% and 2.94%, (e) expected life of 3 years and 4.13 years.
If at any time (i) the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of the Common Stock exceeds $27.60 for not less than the Mandatory Exercise Measuring Period; (ii) the daily average number of shares of Common Stock traded during the Mandatory Exercise Measuring Period equals or exceeds 25,000; and (iii) no equity conditions failure has occurred as of such date, then the Company shall have the right to require the holder to exercise all or any portion of the Series I Warrants still unexercised for a cash exercise.
Exercise of Series H-4 Warrants and Issuance of Series J Warrants
On August 31, 2018, the Company offered (the “Repricing Offer Letter”) to the holders (the “Holders”) of the Company’s outstanding Series H-4 Warrants to purchase common stock of the Company issued on March 8, 2018 (the “Series H-4 Warrants”) the opportunity to exercise such Series H-4 Warrants for cash at a reduced exercise price of $3.60 per share (the “Reduced Exercise Price”) provided such Series H-4 Warrants were exercised for cash on or before September 4, 2018 (the “End Date”). In addition, the Company issued a “reload” warrant (the “Series J Warrants”) to each Holder who exercised their Series H-4 Warrants prior to the End Date, covering one share for each Series H-4 Warrant exercised during that period. The terms of the Series J Warrants are substantially identical to the terms of the Series H-4 Warrants except that (i) the exercise price is equal to $6.00, (ii) the Series J Warrants may be exercised at all times beginning on the 6-month anniversary of the issuance date on a cash basis and also on a cashless basis, (iii) the Series J Warrants do not contain any provisions for anti-dilution adjustment and (iv) the Company has the right to require the Holders to exercise all or any portion of the Series J Warrants still unexercised for a cash exercise if the volume-weighted average price (as defined in the Series J Warrant) for the Company’s common stock equals or exceeds $9.00 for not less than ten consecutive trading days.
If at any time (i) the VWAP of the Common Stock exceeds $9.00 for not less than the Mandatory Exercise Measuring Period; (ii) the daily average number of shares of Common Stock traded during the Mandatory Exercise Measuring Period equals or exceeds 25,000; and (iii) no equity conditions failure has occurred as of such date, then the Company shall have the right to require the holder to exercise all or any portion of the Series J Warrants still unexercised for a cash exercise.
F-28
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
On September 4, 2018, the Company received executed Repricing Offer Letters from a majority of the Holders, which resulted in the issuance of 260,116 shares of the Company’s common stock and Series J Warrants to purchase up to 260,116 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company received gross proceeds of $936,423 from the exercise of the Series H-4 Warrants pursuant to the terms of the Repricing Offer Letter.
On September 5, 2018, the Company received a request from Nasdaq to amend its Series H-4 Warrants to provide that the Series H-4 Warrants may not be exercised until the Company has obtained stockholder approval of the issuance of Common Stock underlying the Series H-4 Warrants pursuant to the applicable rules and regulations of Nasdaq. In response to the request, on September 10, 2018, the Company entered into an amendment (the “Warrant Amendment”) with the holders of the Series H-4 Stock to provide for stockholder approval as described above prior to the exercise of the Series H-4 Warrants. On November 15, 2018, the Company obtained such stockholder approval.
The Company considers the warrant amendment for the Reduced Exercise Price and issuance of the Series J Warrants to be of an equity nature as the amendment and issuance allowed the warrant holders to exercise warrants and receive a share of common stock and warrant which, represents an equity for equity exchange. Therefore, the change in the fair value before and after the modification and the fair value of the Series J warrants will be treated as a deemed dividend in the amount of $1,019,040. The cash received upon exercise in excess of par is accounted through additional paid in capital.
The Company valued the deemed dividend as the sum of: (a) the difference between the fair value of the modified award and the fair value of the original award at the time of modification of $129,476, and (b) the fair value of the Series J Warrants in the amount of $889,564. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of the modification and issuance using the following assumptions: (a) fair value of common stock $3.90, (b) expected volatility of 144.3%, (c) dividend yield of 0%, (d) risk-free interest rate of 2.77% and 2.78%, (e) expected life of 4.51 years and 5 years.
At the March 8, 2018 closing, the Company issued Series H-4 Warrants that entitled the holders to purchase, in aggregate, up to 447,383 shares of its common stock. As referenced above, on September 4, 2018, the Company received executed Repricing Offer Letters from a majority of the investors resulting in the exercise of Series H-4 Warrants to purchase 260,116 shares of common stock. The Series H-4 Warrants were initially exercisable at an exercise price equal to $15.60 per share. On November 15, 2018, the Company obtained shareholder approval to reduce the exercise price from $15.60 per share to $3.60 per share for 187,267 Series H-4 Warrants. The Company considers the modification to the warrant exercise price to be of an equity nature. Therefore, the change in the fair value before and after the modification is accounted for as a deemed dividend in the amount of $63,760.
The Series H-4 Warrants contain anti-dilution price protection that was triggered on December 6, 2019 upon the issuance of the series H-5 Warrants (as defined below), causing the exercise price to decrease from $3.60 per share to $3.12 per share. As a result, the Company recorded a deemed dividend of $2,022 which represents the fair value transferred to the Series H-4 warrant holders from the anti-dilution protection being triggered. The deemed dividend was recorded as an increase to accumulated deficit and increase in additional paid-in capital and reduced net income available to common shareholders by the same amount. The Company valued (a) the fair value of the Series H-4 Shares immediately before the re-pricing in the amount of $77,084, (b) the fair value of the Series H-4 Shares immediately after the re-pricing in the amount of $79,106, and (c) recorded the difference as deemed dividend in the amount of $2,022. The Series H-4 Warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of the exchange using the following assumptions: (a) fair value of common stock $0.62, (b) expected volatility of 155.1%, (c) dividend yield of 0%, (d) risk-free interest rate of 1.64%, (e) expected life of 3.25 years.
Issuance of Pre-Funded Series K Warrants
On November 14, 2018, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with an investor, pursuant to which the CompanyAYRO agreed to issue and sell in a registered direct offering a Pre-Funded Series K Warrant (the “Series K Warrant) to purchase 277,778“February 2021 Offering”) an aggregate of 4,400,001 shares of common stock in lieu of shares of common stock to the extent that the purchase of common stock would cause the beneficial ownership of the purchaser to exceed 9.99% of the Company’s common stock. The Pre-Funded Series K Warrants were soldAYRO, par value $0.0001 per share, at an offering price of $3.54$9.50 per share, for gross proceeds of $983,329, are immediately exercisable for $0.06 per shareapproximately $41.8 million before the deduction of common stockfees and do not haveoffering expenses. Each purchaser was also granted an expiration date.
F-29
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Issuance of Series H-5 Warrants
At the December 6, 2019 closing of the H-5 Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued warrantsoption to purchase, 3,715,254on or before February 16, 2022, additional shares of common stock equal to the full amount of 75% of the Company, withcommon stock it purchased at the initial closing, or an aggregate of 3,300,000 shares, at an exercise price of $0.792$11.50 per share, subject to adjustments (the “H-5 Warrants”share.

Palladium and Spartan Capital Securities, LLC (“Spartan,”). Subject to certain ownership limitations, or collectively with Palladium, the H-5 Warrants will be exercisable beginning six months from the issuance date and will be exercisable for a period of five years from the initial exercise date.

The holders of the H-5 Warrants are entitled to certain anti-dilution adjustments if the Company issues shares of its common stock at a lower price per share than the applicable exercise price (subject to a floor of $0.1584 per share). The H-5 Warrants contain a blocker that prohibits the holder from exercising the warrants if such exercise will result in the beneficial ownership by the holder of more than 9.99% of the Company’s outstanding shares.
A summary of the Company’s warrants to purchase common stock is“Financial Advisors” acted as follows:
 
 
Number of Warrants
 
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price
 
 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)
 
January 1, 2018
  146,358 
 $59.04 
  4.50 
Acquired, H-1 warrants
  50,744 
  29.04 
  1.55 
Acquired, H-3 warrants
  14,001 
  33.12 
  3.25 
Granted, H-4 warrants
  447,383 
  3.60 
  4.18 
Granted, I warrants
  73,178 
  13.80 
  2.30 
Granted, Reload warrants
  260,116 
  6.00 
  2.60 
Granted, K warrants
  277,778 
  0.06 
  * 
Exercised, H-4 warrants
  (260,116)
  3.60 
  - 
Retired, Merger warrants
  (146,358)
  59.04 
  - 
Outstanding, December 31, 2018
  863,084 
 $6.00 
  2.51 
Exercised, K Warrants
  (277,778)
  0.06 
  - 
Granted, H-5 warrants**
  3,715,254 
  0.792 
  5.00 
Outstanding, December 31, 2019
  4,300,560 
 $1.77 
  5.06 
* The Series K warrants do not have an expiration date.
** The Series H-5 warrants are exercisable beginning June 6, 2020. Of the 3,715,254 granted, 243,054 were granted to Palladium, see Note 10.
The warrants expire through the years 2020 - 2024, except for the Series K Warrant which has no expiration date.
10. Related Parties
On July 11, 2018, the Company entered into a consulting agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) with Ascentaur, LLC (“Ascentaur”). Sebastian Giordano is the Chief Executive Officer of Ascentaur. Mr. Giordano has served on the board of directors of the Company since February 2013 and served as the Company’s Interim Chief Executive Officer from August 2013 through April 2016 and as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer from April 2016 through January 2018.
Pursuant to the terms of the Consulting Agreement, Ascentaur has agreed to provide advisory services with respect to the strategic development and growth of the Company, including advising the Company on market strategy and overall Company strategy, advising the Company on the sale of the Company’s Suisun City Operations, providing assistance to the Company in identifying and recruiting prospective employees, customers, business partners, investors and advisors that offer desirable administrative, financing, investment, technical, marketing and/or strategic expertise, and performing such other services pertaining to the Company’s business as the Company and Ascentaur may from time to time mutually agree. The term of the Consulting Agreement commenced on July 11, 2018 and will continue until terminated in accordance with the terms of the Consulting Agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded $33,733 as general and administrative expense related to this consulting agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2019, approximately $130,557 was paid in cash and $0 is recorded as accounts payable. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded $147,754 as general and administrative related to this consulting agreement. As of December 31, 2018, approximately $51,000 was paid in cash and approximately $97,000 is recorded as accounts payable. Of this amount, Ascentaur received $90,000 in relation to the sale of Suisun City Operations.
F-30
DropCar, Inc., and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
During 2018 and 2017, the Company entered into various financial transactions with Alpha Capital Anstalt, a majority shareholder, through the issuance of $1,350,000 convertible notes in 2017, issued 213,707 shares of common stockAdvisors in connection with the merger on January 30, 2018 for merger related services and cost of providing capital, issued 11,093 Series A Preferred Stock for $2,612,500 in the March 8, 2018 PIPE transaction, and was issued 277,778 Series K prefunded common stock warrants on November 14, 2018 for proceeds of approximately $983,000.
Palladium CapitalFebruary 2021 Offering. The Financial Advisors (“Palladium”), and advisorare entitled to the Company and AYRO, has provided investment banking services in connection with the merger on January 30, 2018 and received 35,558 shares of common stock for merger related services, received 1,371 Series H-4 preferred shares and warrants in the March 8, 2018 PIPE transaction for advisory services, and in connection with the December 6, 2019 Series H-5 Stock transaction received $200,000 and 243,054 H-5 Warrants.
On December 5, 2019, the Company entered into a placement agent and merger advisory agreement with Palladium whereby the Company shall pay to Palladium a cash fee equal to 8% of the aggregate gross proceeds raiseraised in closingthe February 2021 Offering, or an aggregate of approximately $3,344,001, and warrants (the “February 2021 Warrants”) to purchase an aggregate of 271,158 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $10.925 per share and 35,885 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $10.45 per share. The February 2021 Warrants are exercisable immediately following issuance and terminate five years following issuance.

On March 17, 2021, in connection with a certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated December 19, 2019, whereby certain former stockholders of AYRO Operating entered into lock-up agreements (collectively, the “May Lock-Up Agreements”) pursuant to which they agreed to certain restrictions on the transfer or sale of shares of the Company’s common stock for the one-year period following the Merger, AYRO modified the May Lock-Up Agreements to allow each stockholder party to a May Lock-Up Agreement to (i) sell up to 5% of such stockholder’s holdings in the Company’s common stock on any trading day (with such 5% limitation to be measured as of the date of each financing transactionsale) and warrants(ii) allow for unlimited sales of the Company’s common stock for any sales made at $10.00 per share or greater.

Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement dated July 21, 2020, between January 1, 2021 and March 30, 2021, investors had elected to purchase that number302,500 of sharesthe Additional Shares of common stock of the Company equal to 7% of the aggregate number of shares of common stock sold in each offering. The warrants will be identical to any warrants issued to investors at such closing, provide for a cashless exercise, have an exercise price equal to the offering price per share in the closing, and expire on the five year anniversary at such closing. In addition, the Company shall pay Palladium compensation for advisory services in connection with a possible business combination of the Company with an unaffiliated third party whereby the Company shall issue the number of shares of common stock of the post-merger entity immediately after the merger that represents 2.5% of the outstanding shares of common stock in any surviving post-merger entity.

11. Subsequent Events
The Company has analyzed its operations subsequent to December 31, 2019 and noted the following subsequent events:
The Company’s operations may be affected by the recent and ongoing outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) which in March 2020, was been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The ultimate disruption which may be caused by the outbreak is uncertain; however it may result in a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position, operations and cash flows. Possible areas that may be affected include, but are not limited to, disruption to the Company’s customers and revenue, labor workforce, and the decline in value of assets held by the Company, including, property and equipment.
On February 5, 2020 the Company entered into separate Exchange Agreements (the “Exchange Agreements”) with the holders of existing Series H-5 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series H-5 Shares”),AYRO, par value $0.0001 per share, at an offering price of $5.00 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $1.51 million before the deduction of fees and offering expenses.

During March 2021, the Company subleased additional office space to exchange an equivalent number of shares ofsupport the Company’s Series H-6 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series H-6 Shares”), par value $0.0001 per share (the “Exchange”).expansion plan. The Exchange closed on February 5, 2020.

On February 12, 2020, the Company receivedterm is for 16 months with a notice from the New York State Departmenttotal lease obligation of Labor stating the Company has a negative balance in their experience rating account of approximately $165,000. The notice states the Company may make a voluntary payment of approximately $165,000. The Company does not expect to make this payment which will result in an increase to their future unemployment insurance rates. The Company will need to pay the max rate for a three-year period for not making the payment.$131,408.

F-44
Subsequent to December 31, 2019, investors converted 4,900 shares of Series H-6 Shares into 490,000 shares of Common Stock.
F-31