Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

[x]x       ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended August 31, 20162019

or

[_]o       TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to _________

Commission file number: 001-32046

 

Simulations Plus, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

95-4595609

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

  

42505 Tenth Street West

Lancaster, CA 93534-7059

(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)


(661) 723-7723

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

Title of Each Class

Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT: NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes [_]o No [X]x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes [_]o No [X]x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filings requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes    [X]x  No   [_]o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes    [X]x  No   [_]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.           [X]o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Act.

[_]  Large accelerated filero[X]  Accelerated filerx

[_]  

Non-accelerated filer  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

o
[X]   Smaller reporting companyx
Emerging growth company  o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [  ]o No [X]x

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of February 28, 2016,2019, based upon the closing price of the common stock as reported by The Nasdaq StockCapital Market on such date, was approximately $102,975,104.$246,955,803. This calculation does not reflect a determination that persons are affiliates for any other purposes.

As of November 14, 2016, 17,226,478 shares13, 2019,17,623,324shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Certain portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be delivered to its shareholders in connection with the registrant’s 20172019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K. Such definitive proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this annual report on Form 10-K.

   

 

 

Simulations Plus, Inc.
FORM 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended August 31, 20162019

 

Table of Contents

 

 Page
PART I
  
ITEM 1 – BUSINESS1
ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS913
ITEM 1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS923
ITEM 2 – PROPERTIES923
ITEM 3 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS1024
ITEM 4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.DISCLOSURES1024
  
PART II
  
ITEM 5 – MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES1125
ITEM 6 – SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA1227
ITEM 7 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS1228
ITEM 7A – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK2239
ITEM 8 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA2239
ITEM 9 – CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE2239
ITEM 9A – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES2239
ITEM 9B – OTHER INFORMATION2340
  
PART III
  
ITEM 10 – DIRECTORS, AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE2441
ITEM 11 – EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION2441
ITEM 12 – SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS2441
ITEM 13 – CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE2441
ITEM 14 – PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES2441
  
PART IV
  
ITEM 15 – EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES2542
SIGNATURES2744

 

 

 

 

 i 

 

 

Forward-Looking Statements

Forward-Looking Statements

 

This document and the documents incorporated in this document by reference contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical fact contained in this document and the materials accompanying this document are forward-looking statements.

 

The forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs of our management, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to our management. Frequently, but not always, forward-looking statements are identified by the use of the future tense and by words such as “believes,” expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “will,” “may,” “could,” “would,” “projects,” “continues,” “estimates” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results could differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

 

The forward-looking statements contained or incorporated by reference in this document are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), and are subject to the safe harbor created by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements include declarations regarding our plans, intentions, beliefs, or current expectations.

 

Among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements are the risks and uncertainties described under “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report and elsewhere in this document and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).SEC.

 

Forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. The forward-looking statements included in this document are made as of the date of this document and we do not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect new information, subsequent events, or otherwise, except as required by law.otherwise.

 

ii

PART I

 

ITEM 1 –BUSINESS

 

As used in this report, each of the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” and “Simulations Plus” refers to Simulations Plus, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries Cognigen Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Simulations Plus,Buffalo, New York, and DILIsym Services, Inc of Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires.

 

OVERVIEW

 

Simulations Plus, Inc., incorporated in 1996, is a premier developer of groundbreaking drug discovery and development software for mechanistic modeling and simulation, and for machine-learning-based prediction of properties of molecules solely from their structure, and is exploring the application of its machine-learning technologies in other industries, including aerospace/military and general healthcare.structure. Our pharmaceutical/chemistry software is licensed to major pharmaceutical, biotechnology, agrochemical, cosmetics, and food industry companies and to regulatory agencies worldwide for use in the conduct of industry-based research. We also provide consulting services ranging from early drug discovery through preclinical and clinical trial data analysis and for submissions to regulatory agencies. Simulations Plus is headquartered in Southern California, with offices in Buffalo, New York, and Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, and its common stock trades on the NASDAQNasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “SLP.”

 

In September 2014, We are a global leader focused on improving the ways scientists use knowledge and data to predict the properties and outcomes of pharmaceutical and biotechnology agents and provide a wide range of early discovery, preclinical, and clinical consulting services and software. Our innovations in integrating new and existing science in medicinal chemistry, computational chemistry, pharmaceutical science, biology, physiology, and machine learning into our software have made us the leading software provider for PBPK modeling and simulation, prediction of molecular properties from structure, and prediction of drugs to induce liver injury or to treat nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

We generate revenue by delivering relevant, cost-effective software and creative and insightful consulting services. Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies use our software programs and scientific consulting services to guide early drug discovery (molecule design and screening), preclinical, and clinical development programs. They also use our software products and services to enhance their understanding of the properties of potential new medicines and to use emerging data to improve formulations, select and justify dosing regimens, support the generics industry, optimize clinical trial designs, and simulate outcomes in special populations, such as the elderly and pediatric patients.

Simulations Plus acquired Cognigen Corporation (Cognigen) as a wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary pursuant to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 23, 2014, by and between Simulations Plus and Cognigen (the “Merger Agreement”).in September 2014. Cognigen was originally incorporated in 1992. Through the integration of Cognigen into Simulations Plus, Simulations Plus is now alsobecame a leading provider of population modeling and simulation contract research services for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. Our clinical-pharmacology-based consulting services include pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling, clinical trial simulations, data programming, and technical writing services in support of regulatory submissions. We have also developed software for harnessing cloud-based computing in support of modeling and simulation activities and secure data archiving, and we provide consulting services to improve interdisciplinary collaborations and research and development productivity.

 

Simulation Plus acquired DILIsym Services, Inc. (DILIsym) as a wholly owned subsidiary in June 2017. The acquisition of DILIsym positions the Company as the leading provider of Drug Induced Liver Injury (DILI) modeling and simulation software and related scientific consulting services. In addition to the DILIsym® software for analysis of potential drug-induced liver injury, DILIsym Services, Inc. also has developed a simulation program for analyzing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) called NAFLDsym™. Both the DILIsym and NAFLDsym software programs require outputs from physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) software as inputs. The GastroPlus™ PBPK software from Simulations Plus provides such information; thus, the integration of these technologies will provide a seamless capability for analyzing the potential for drug-induced liver injury for new drug compounds and for investigating the potential for new therapeutic agents to treat nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Since the acquisition, DILIsym has applied its mechanistic modeling resources in other disease areas including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and others.

 

 

 1 

 

 

We are a global leader focused on improving the ways scientists use knowledge and data to predict the properties and outcomes of pharmaceutical and biotechnology agents, and are one of only two global companies who provide a wide range of preclinical and clinical consulting services and software. Our innovations in integrating new and existing science in medicinal chemistry, computational chemistry, pharmaceutical science, biology, physiology, and machine learning into our software have made us the leading software provider for physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) modeling and simulation and for prediction of molecular properties from structure.

We generate revenue by delivering relevant, cost-effective software and creative and insightful consulting services. Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies use our software programs and scientific knowledge to guide early drug discovery (molecule design and screening), preclinical, and clinical development programs. They also use it to enhance their understanding of the properties of potential new medicines and to use emerging data to improve formulations, select and justify dosing regimens, support the generics industry, optimize clinical trial design, and simulate outcomes in special populations, such as the elderly and pediatric patients.

PRODUCTS

 

General

We currently offer eightten software products for pharmaceutical research and development: threefive simulation programs that provide time-dependent results based on solving large sets of differential equations: GastroPlus™GastroPlus®; DDDPlus™; MembranePlus™; DILIsym®; and MembranePlus™NAFLDsym™; three programs that are based on predicting and analyzing static (not time-dependent) properties of chemicals: ADMET Predictor™Predictor®; MedChem Designer™; and MedChem Studio™ (the combination of ADMET Predictor, MedChem Designer, and MedChem Studio is called our ADMET Design Suite™); one recently-announceda program which is designed for rapid clinical trial data analysis and regulatory submissions called PKPlus™; and onea program called KIWI™ from our Cognigen division that provides an integrated platform for data analysis and reporting through our proprietary secure cloud. During the fourth fiscal quarter of the fiscal year ended August 31, 2016, we announced the release of our newest software offering, PKPlus™, a next-generation software package for noncompartmental and compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis and reporting, which is further described below.

 

GastroPlusGastroPlus®

Our flagship product, originally introduced in 1998, and currently our largest single source of software revenue, is GastroPlus. GastroPlus mechanistically simulates the absorption, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacodynamicsdrug-drug interactions of drugscompounds administered to humans and animals and is currently the most widely used commercial software of its type by pharmaceutical companies, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), and other government agencies in the U.S. and other countries. The FDA currently has 70In May 2019, we were pleased to announce the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) in Japan added licenses to the GastroPlus licenses.software suite.

 

Because of the widespread use of GastroPlus, we were the only non-European company invited to join the European Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) program for Oral Bioavailability Tools (OrBiTo). OrBiTo begun in 2012, iswas an international collaboration among 27 industry, academic, and government organizations working in the area of oral absorption of pharmaceutical products. Because we are outside of the European Union, our participation in this project iswas at our own expense, while other members arewere compensated for their work; however, we arewere a full member with access to all of the data and discussions of all other members. We believe our investment to participate in this initiative enablesenabled us to benefit from, and to contribute to, advancing the prediction of human oral bioavailability from preclinical data, and ensuresensured that we are well-known to member pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies.

 

In September 2016 we announced that Simulations Plus had been invited to join the European SimInhale Consortium and had been admitted to this prestigious group focused on advancing the state of the art for simulation of inhaled dosage forms. As one of only two U.S. participants, Simulations Plus will participate in activities designed toadvance particle designs for improved deposition and interaction with lung tissue; promote realistic computer simulations of particle aerosolization, delivery and deposition; promote patient-tailored inhaled medicines; promote integration of device and formulation design; and promote critical assessment of toxicity issues and related risks.

In September 2014, we entered into a research collaboration agreement (RCA) with the FDA to enhance the Ocular Compartmental Absorption and Transit (OCAT™) model within the Additional DosingDosage Routes Module of GastroPlus. The objective of this agreement iswas to provide a tool for generic companies and the FDA to assess the likely bioequivalence of generic drug formulations dosed to the eye. Under this RCA, we receivereceived up to $200,000 per year. This RCA maycould be renewed for up to a total of three years based on the progress achieved during the project. After a successful second year, the RCA was renewedextended for its third yeartwo additional years in September 2016, and will expirewith primary tasks completed in September 2017.2018. Additional functionality was further requested by the FDA, and a new funded contract was awarded for the 2018-19 period.

2

 

We were awarded another RCA by the FDA in September 2015,2015; this timeone to expand the capabilities of GastroPlus to simulate the dosing of long-acting injectable microspheres.microspheres for both small and large molecules (biologics). This type of dosage form is usually injected via subcutaneous or intramuscular routes, but canroutes. This RCA also be used for ocular dosing. Once again, this RCA provides up to $200,000 per year for up to three years. Under this agreement, we are developing simulation models to deal with the very slow dissolution/decomposition of the microsphere carrier material that gradually releases the active drug over periods as long as weeks or months. After a successful firstsecond year, the RCA was renewed for the secondthird year in September 2016,2017 and will expirewas completed in September 2017 unless re-renewed.2018, with further extensions under consideration with the FDA and/or large pharmaceutical company sponsor(s).

In September 2018, we were pleased to announce that we were awarded another funded RCA by the FDA to integrate drug product quality attributes into the mechanistic TCAT model in GastroPlus. This grant award, for $250,000 per year for up to two years, will focus on the incorporation of drug product quality attributes into dermal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models developed for dermatological topical dosage forms and transdermal delivery systems.

2

In July 2018 we entered into a one-year funded research collaboration with a large European consortium to further develop and validate the mechanistic Transdermal Compartmental Absorption and Transit (TCAT™) model in GastroPlus. This project will contribute substantially to improvements in the program, specifically directed toward the predictions of local exposure within the skin layer following topical administration of various chemicals. We expect the developments under this agreement will aid companies and regulatory agencies as they strive to implement an animal-free chemical safety assessment program.

 

In addition to the two active funded efforts with the FDA described above, we also have antwo unfunded RCARCAs with the FDA’sFDA: one with the Office of Generic Drugs (OGD) that began in 2014. The2014, and one announced in July 2019 with the Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM). With OGD, the objective of this RCA, which has a five-year term, is directed toward the FDA’s evaluation of mechanistic IVIVCs (in vitro-in vivo correlations) to determine whether mechanistic absorption modeling (MAM) can relate laboratory (in vitro) dissolution experiment results to the behavior of dosage forms in humans and animals (in vivo) better than traditional empirical methods. With CVM, the objective is to use GastroPlus, within vitroandin vivo data, to investigate how bioequivalence (BE) of non-systemically absorbed products can be evaluated in canines without the need for clinical endpoint trials.

 

In April 2015,May 2018, we released Version 9.09.6 of GastroPlus. This wasVersion 9.6 provided the largest single upgrade we have made to the program to date, and the added level of science and technology enabled valuablefollowing new functionalities that we believe provide the mostand advanced decision-making tooltools for preclinical and early clinical trial simulation and modeling analysis available today. Several of the significant enhancements include:analysis:

 

 ·abilityNew dynamic intestinal fluid options added to simulate the #1-ranked ACAT™ oral absorption and distribution of biologics (antibodies and proteins);model
 ·ability to simulate dosing to the skin, including patches, creams, ointments,New population physiologies for obesity and subcutaneous injections; andrenal impairment disease states
 ·tighter integrationExpanded enzyme/transporter distribution information for easier extrapolation across species
·Additional compound model files for standard drug-drug interaction (DDI) substrates & inhibitors
·Upgraded capabilities to all major mechanistic absorption routes, including dermal, pulmonary, ocular, and subcutaneous/intramuscular injections
·Enhanced deconvolution methods for generation of mechanisticin vitro-in vivo correlations (IVIVCs)
·Improved output/reporting functions in all simulation modes to facilitate communication across departments and with our ADMET Predictor™ softwareregulatory agencies
·Significant simulation speed improvements
·Custom template generation for seamless use of GastroPlus to increase the utility of the program in early drug discovery.drive DILIsym® SimPops™ liver injury predictions

  

Our goal with GastroPlus is to integrate the most advanced science into user-friendly software to enable pharmaceutical researchers and regulators to perform sophisticated analyses of complex drugcompound behaviors in humans and laboratory animals. Already the most widely used program in the world for physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK),PBPK modeling, the addition of these new capabilities is expected to expand the user base in the early pharmaceutical research and development process, while also helping us to further penetrate the biopharmaceuticals, food, cosmetics, and general toxicology markets.

We are now finalizingwork to release updated versions of the development of version 9.5program on an ongoing basis. In May 2018, we released Version 9.6 of GastroPlus, which will addand Version 9.7 was released in June 2019. This version adds a number of important new capabilities, including improvements to population simulations, dissolution, absorption, PBPK models, and will refine and enhance some of the existing capabilities in the program, including intramuscular dosing, simulation of antibody-drug conjugates, additional animal physiologies, enhanced report generation, and enhancements to the PBPK tissue models. We expect to release version 9.5 before the end of calendar year 2016.drug-drug interactions, among others.

·The ability to add lysosomal trapping effect to PBPK tissues

·New mechanistic pregnancy PBPK model (with fetus compartment)

·Additional solubility inputs for different drug forms (crystalline, amorphous)

·New models of standard compounds (substrates/inhibitors/inducers) in DDI Module

·Expanded fed state conditions based on meal type

3

·New ability to allow different tissue model types (perfusion- or permeability-limited) between parent and metabolites or victim perpetrator in metabolite tracking/DDI simulations

·PK-PD model additions to PKPlus Module

·Updates to the dermal absorption (TCAT) model through Cosmetics Europe project

·New effect of immune response with intramuscular injection models

·Updated default populations for extensive, intermediate, and poor metabolizers based on specific genotypes

  

DDDPlusDDDPlus™

DDDPlus mechanistically simulatesin vitro (laboratory) experiments that measure the rate of dissolution of a drug and,as well as, if desired, the additives (excipients) in a particular dosage form (e.g., powder, tablet, capsule, or capsule)injectable solids) under a variety of experimental conditions. This unique software program is used by formulation scientists in industry and the FDA to (1) understand the physical mechanisms affecting the disintegration and dissolution rate forrates of various formulations, (2) reduce the number of cut-and-try attempts to design new drug formulations, and (3) designin vitrodissolution experiments to better mimicin vivo (animal and human) conditions.conditions, and (4) justify product specifications. Version 5.06.0 of DDDPlus which adds a number of significant enhancements, was released in April 2016. This version addsJanuary 2019 and offers a series of new formulation types (controlled release bilayer tablet, delayed release coated tablet, and immediate release coated beads), expanded formulation specification options, biorelevant solubilities and surfactant effects on dissolution, tablet compression and disintegration models, links with GastroPlus, and updated licensing.capabilities, including:

 

·simulation of thein vitro dissolution of long-acting injectable dosage forms (funded by the FDA grant supporting GastroPlus development)
·simulation of thein vitro dissolution of controlled release bead formulations
·new simulation of artificial stomach-duodenum (ASD) experiments
·ability to fit models from precipitation experiments
·new dissolution apparatus models
·improved output reporting

MembranePlus™

MembranePlus was released in October 2014.

Similar to DDDPlus, MembranePlus mechanistically simulates laboratory experiments, but in this case, the experiments are for measuring permeability or clearance of drug-like molecules through various membranes, including several different standard cell cultures (Caco-2, MDCK), as well as artificially formulated membranes (PAMPA).hepatocytes. The value of such a simulationsimulations derives from the fact that when the permeabilities of the same molecules are measured in different laboratories using (supposedly) the same experimental conditions, the results are often significantly different. These differences are caused by a complex interplay of factors in how the experiment was set up and run. MembranePlus simulates these experiments with their specific experimental details, and this enables scientists to better interpret how results from specific experimental protocols can be used to predict permeability or clearance mechanisms in human and animals, which is the ultimate goal. A few initial sales of MembranePlus have been made. Similar to DDDPlus ten years ago, this program is a new concept that requires educating scientists on how and why to use it, and our marketing and sales program has been tasked with providing that training.animals.

 34 

 

PKPlus™

On

In August 25, 2016, we announced the release ofreleased a new standalone software product called PKPlus, based on the internal PKPlus Module in GastroPlus that has been available since 2000. The PKPlus Module in GastroPlus provides quick and easy fitting of compartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) models as well as a simple noncompartmental analysis (NCA) for intravenous and extravascular (oral, dermal, ocular, pulmonary, etc.) doses; however, the PKPlus Module in GastroPlus was not designed to meet all of the requirements for performing these analyses for Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, and producingnor to produce report-quality output for regulatory submissions. The new standalone PKPlus program has been developed to provideprovides the full level of functionality needed by pharmaceutical industry scientists to perform the analyses and generate the outputs needed to fully satisfy regulatory agency requirements for both more complex NCA andas well as compartmental PK modeling. We

PKPlus version 2.5 was released in July 2019. This new version incorporates a wide variety of requested features from current users, including:

Import CDISC SEND packages with PC domain as source data
Improved command line functionality
64-bit system optimization for improved performance
Streamlined auto-reports
Additional workflow refinements

Starting with version 2.0, we provide PKPlus for free to academics because we believe it will help educate the potential numbernext generation of eventual usersscientists entering the industries we serve and drive demand for the product. Hundreds of copies of PKPlus is inhave been downloaded by universities around the thousands world-wide and that it has the potentialworld to eventually become one of our leading revenue producers.date.

 

ADMET Predictor™Predictor®

ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity) Predictor is a chemistry-based computer program that takes molecular structures (i.e., drawings of molecules represented in various formats) as inputs and predictsuses machine learning technology to predict approximately 150 different properties for them at an average rate of over 100,000 compounds per hour on a modern laptop computer. This capability allows chemists to generate estimates for a large number of important molecular properties without the need to synthesize and test the molecules, as well as to generate estimates of unknown properties for molecules that have been synthesized, but for which only a limited number of experimental properties have been measured. Thus, a chemist can assess the likely success of a large number of existing molecules in a company’s chemical library, as well as molecules that have never been made, by providing only their molecular structures, either by drawing them using a tool such as our MedChem Designer software, or by automatically generating large numbers of molecules using various computer algorithms, including those embedded in our MedChem Studio software.

 

ADMET Predictor has been top-ranked for predictive accuracy in multiple peer-reviewed, independent comparison studies for many years, while generating its results at a very high throughput rate. Although the state of the art of this type of software does not enable identifying the best molecule in a series, it does allow early screening of molecules that are highly likely to fail as potential drug candidates (i.e., the worst molecules, which is usuallytypically the majority of a virtual chemical library) before synthesizing and testing them. Thus, millions of virtual compounds can be created and screened in a day, compared to potentially months or years of work to actually synthesize and test a much smaller number of actual compounds.

 

The most recent release of ADMET Predictor, version 8.0, was released on August 1, 2016. This new version features a completely redesigned and modernized interface as well as a number of new capabilities to enhance the performance and user-friendliness of the program. In addition, we have integrated a number of MedChem Studio features into the new ADMET Predictor, and created a tighter integration between the two programs when a MedChem Studio license is obtained along with an ADMET Predictor license.

The optional ADMET Modeler™ Module in ADMET Predictor enables scientists to use their own experimental data to quickly create proprietary high-quality predictive models using the same powerful machine-learning methodsartificial intelligence (AI) engine we use to build our top-ranked property predictions. Pharmaceutical companies expend substantial time and money conducting a wide variety of experiments on new molecules each year, generating large databases of experimental data. Using this proprietary data to build predictive models can provide a second return on their investment; however, model building has traditionally been a difficult and tedious activity performed by specialists. The automation in ADMET Modeler makes it easy for a scientist to create very powerful machine-learning/AI models with minimal training.

 

Version 9.5 was released in April 2019, adding:

·Novel approaches to calculate uncertainty estimates on all regression models
·New machine learning models for important metabolism and transporter endpoints
·New machine learning models for AMES mutagenicity, a primary toxicity endpoint required during risk assessment
·New Structure Sensitivity Analysis visualization tool to easily map atom-level contributions to model predictions
·Improved rat-specific models to more accurately inform HTPK Simulation predictions
·Improved Pipeline Pilot and KNIME components to extend deployment options and enterprise support for ADMET Predictor
·Updates to output displays in MedChem Designer™

5

We have made significant investments in two key areas with recent versions: improving integration of our top-ranked ADMET Predictor and GastroPlus models to leverage our novel ‘Discovery PBPK’ approaches for chemists and safety researchers, and further enhancing our best-in-class machine learning engine to assist with drug discovery. Recent publications from pharmaceutical and chemical companies describing how they have leveraged our ‘Discovery PBPK’ methods to guide lead optimization and risk assessment illustrate how our unique offerings provide substantial value in these spaces. In April 2019, we were pleased to announce the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products procured a 15-user license to the ADMET Predictor software suite. The purchase was made to support research projects aimed at informing regulatory decision making.

Potential new markets for machine learningartificial intelligence (machine learning)

We are currently investigating applications of our sophisticated machine-learningartificial intelligence (machine-learning) engine outside of our normal pharmaceutical markets. To date, we have conducted several proof-of-concept studies including: (1) building predictive models for missile aerodynamic forceinvolving aerodynamics and moment coefficients as a functionalso classifying of missile geometry, Mach number, and angle of attack, (2) classifying/identifying missiles and other objects from radar tracking data, (3) mapping jet engine compressor performance to predict when maintenance might be required, and (4) classifying patients as healthy or experiencing some disease state or genetic disorder evidenced by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. Other potential applications for this modeling engine have also been identified; however, our focus to date has been primarily in these areas.

 

We believe our proprietary machine-learningAI/machine learning software engine has a wide variety of potential applications and we intend to pursue funding to develop customized tools to further monetize our investment in this technology by expanding our markets beyond the life sciences and chemistry. In addition, we are examining a variety of expanded capabilities to add to the basic modeling engine to accommodate even larger data sets (“big data analytics”) and new applications.

 

4

MedChem Designer™

MedChem Designer was launched in 2011. It was initially a molecule-drawing program, or “sketcher”, but now has capabilities far exceeding those of other molecule-drawing programs because of its integration with both MedChem Studio and ADMET Predictor. We provide MedChem Designer for free because we believe that in the long run it will help to increase demand for ADMET Predictor and MedChem Studio, and because most other existing molecule-drawing programs are also provided for free. Our free version includes a small set of ADMET Predictor’s best-in-class property predictions, allowing the chemist to modify molecular structures and then see a few key properties very quickly. With a paid ADMET Predictor license, the chemist would see the entire approximately 150 predictions that are available. Over 16,00028,000 copies of MedChem Designer have been downloaded by scientists around the world to date.

 

When used with a license for ADMET Predictor, MedChem Designer becomes ade novo molecule design tool. With it, a researcher can draw one or more molecular structures, then click on the ADMET Predictor icon and have approximately150approximately 150 properties for each structure calculated in seconds, including our proprietary ADMET Risk™ index.index which provides a single number that instantly compare the effects of different structural changes in many dimensions. Researchers can also click on an icon to generate the likely metabolites of a molecule and then predict all of the properties of those metabolites from ADMET Predictor, including each of their ADMET Risk scores. This is important because a metabolite of a molecule can be therapeutically beneficial (or harmful) even though the parent molecule is not.

 

Our proprietary ADMET Risk score provides a single number that tells the chemist how many default threshold values for various predicted properties were crossed (or violated) by each structure. Thus, in a single number, the chemist can instantly compare the effects of different structural changes in many dimensions. The ideal score is zero; however, a low score greater than zero might be acceptable, depending on what property(s) caused the points to be assigned. If the number is too high (greater than 5 or 6), the molecule is not likely to be successful as a drug. The default rules can be modified and new rules can be added by the user to include any desired rule set based on any combination of calculated descriptors, predicted properties, and user inputs. As chemists attempt to modify structures to improve one property, they often cause others to become unacceptable. Without ADMET Risk, the chemist would have to individually examine many key properties for each new molecule (and its metabolites) to determine whether any of them became unacceptable as a result of changing the structure.

MedChem Studio™

The MedChem Studio Module in ADMET Predictor is a powerful software tool that is used both for data mining and forde novo design of new molecules. In its data-mining role, MedChem Studio facilitates searching large chemical libraries to find molecules that contain identified substructures, and it enables rapid identification of clusters (classes) of molecules that share common substructures. MedChem Studio version 4.0 was released during fiscal year 2014. We have now merged MedChem Studio with the refactoring of ADMET Predictor 8.0, so that either program can be entered through the same interface, and the communication between the two programs is enhanced through the seamless integration of both technologies. We believe this will enhance the attractiveness of both ADMET Predictor and MedChem Studio to medicinal and computational chemists.

 

While MedChem Designer can be used to refine a small number of molecules, the MedChem Studio Module can be used to create and screen (with ADMET Predictor) very large numbers of molecules down to a few promising lead candidates. MedChem Studio has features that enable it to generate new molecular structures using a variety ofde novo design methods. When MedChem Studio is used with ADMET Predictor and MedChem Designer (the combination of which we refer to as our ADMET Design Suite), we believe the programs provide an unmatched capability for chemists to search through large libraries of compounds that have undergone high-throughput screening experiments to find the most promising classes (groups of molecules with a large common part of their structures) and molecules that are active against a particular target. In addition, MedChem Studio can take an interesting (but not acceptable) molecule and, using a variety of design algorithms, quickly generate many thousands to millions of high qualityhigh-quality analogs (similar new molecules). These molecules can then be screened using ADMET Predictor to find molecules that are predicted to be both active against the target and acceptable in a variety of ADMET properties. We demonstrated the power of the ADMET Design Suite during two NCE (new chemical entity) projects wherein we designed lead molecules to inhibit the growth of theplasmodium falciparum malaria parasite in one study, and lead molecules that were combinedable to inhibit two targets at the same time: COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors.COX-2. In each case, we announced ahead of time that we were attempting to do this, and we reported the results when the projects were complete. Every molecule we designed and had synthesized hit their targets in both projects.projects, clearly demonstrating the power of the ADMET Design Suite.

 

6

KIWITMKIWI™

Drug development programs rely increasingly on modeling and simulation analyses to support decision-making and submissions to regulatory agencies. To ensure high-quality analyses, organizations must not only apply high-quality science, but must also be able to support the science by being able to validate the results. KIWI is a cloud-based web application that was developed to efficiently organize, process, maintain, and communicate the volume of data and results generated by pharmacologists and scientists over the duration of a drug development program. The validated workflow and tools within KIWI promote traceability and reproducibility of results.

5

 

The pharmaceutical industry has been rapidly adopting cloud technology as a solution to ever-expanding computer processing needs. Leveraging our 20-plus years of experience in providing an architecture supporting modeling and simulation efforts, we have developed KIWI as a secure, validated, enterprise-scale environment, enabling global teams to collaborate on model-based decision making. KIWI has proven to be a valuable platform for encouraging interdisciplinary discussions about the model development process and interpretation of results. We continue to receive positive feedback about the functionality implemented in KIWI and the value of the approach we have taken to harness cloud technology. We continue to improve functionality and collaboration within the KIWI platform, and we expect the licensing fee will be a source of recurring revenue for further development and growth.

We release new versions of the program on a regular basis. KIWI Version 1.32 was released in May 2015. This versionDecember 2017, KIWI 3 was released in August 2018, and in 2019 Q1, an enhanced editor and grouping of visualizations for easy replication was added, resulting in streamlined model development.

KIWI provides our user community4 was released in June 2019. A pharmacometric analysis is an evolutionary process – one that often results in the creation of hundreds of new program files and code changes to hundreds more due to common typographical and programmatic errors. The Model Wizard and the Covariate Analysis toolset aim to significantly reduce the time spent creating models, correcting errors, and replicating program files for performing stepwise covariate analyses, allowing pharmacometricians to focus on advancing science. With continued feedback from KIWI license holders, various visualizations within KIWI 4.0 and the pharmacometric-specific Data Repository continue to be updated with access to new features that accelerate completion of modeling projects by decreasing run times and facilitating the comparison and exporting of results across models. These features include dynamic comparisons of model parameter estimates and diagnostic plots, export of model run records for regulatory submissions, and accelerated infrastructure with the upgradefunctionality. In 2020 Q1, incremental improvements to the latest versions of NONMEM®existing KIWI functionality have been added to improve graph appearance in both the Visualize and Perl-speaks-NONMEM running in a 64-bit Linux environment.Explore modules.

 

7

We continue enhancing KIWI as part of our five-year, almost-$5 million contract with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

DILIsym

The DILIsym software is a quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) program that has been in development since 2011. QSP software models are based on the fundamental understanding of complex biological pathways, disease processes, and drug mechanisms of action, integrating information from experiments and forming hypotheses for the next experimental model. DILIsym deals with the propensity for some drug molecules to induce temporary or permanent changes in biological functions within liver cells (hepatocytes) that can result in damage to the liver. Some drugs cause temporary changes in liver function but the body soon compensates and liver function returns to normal. Other drugs cause liver function to permanently decline as they continue to be taken. The DILIsym software models a variety of interactions within the hepatocytes to determine whether a particular drug molecule interrupts normal signaling pathways in a manner to induce injury to the cells.

Version 1.58A of the DILIsym software was released in March 2016.January of 2019. This version is again delivered as a secure executable that incorporates new proprietary code enabling tighter integration with our GastroPlus PBPK software. Securing the code is necessary to ensure that results are consistent across all users to assure regulatory agencies that the calculated results are from a validated version. Open source programs are subject to modification by the user and so each use could have a different set of calculations, so validation would not be assured. In addition, a number of important new capabilities were added:

·10 New validation compounds
·New Cholestatic liver injury mechanism
·New Oxidative stress (ROS) NRF2 adaptation response framework
·New Human SimPops with variability in bilirubin processing pathways
·New Liver injury biomarker GLDH
·Live DILIsym documentation website updated with new training resources

NAFLDsym

Where DILIsym is used to investigate the likelihood that a known drug molecule would cause injury to the liver, NAFLDsym is concerned with a liver that is already diseased (NAFLD/NASH) by excess fat, fibrosis, and inflammation, and investigates the likelihood that various molecules might provide beneficial therapeutic benefits to treat or cure the disease. DILIsym can be considered a “shrink wrap” software product, usable across many companies and drug development projects. NAFLDsym, on the other hand, requires modification for each of a number of different mechanisms of action that potential new drug compounds could use to treat the disease, and so is a customized tool used in consulting projects for each new client project. NAFLDsym version introduced major enhancements2A was released in the functionalitysummer of visualization tools offered by2019 for licensing and consulting use. The software now includes the platform. These enhancementsthree most important components of NAFLD/NASH: steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis, along with a host of other important updates.

RENAsym

Where DILIsym is used to investigate the likelihood that a known drug molecule would cause injury to the liver, RENAsym will be focused on investigating and predicting drug-induced kidney injury, or acute kidney injury (AKI). RENAsym will be another “shrink wrap” software product, usable across many companies and drug development projects. The software will utilize predictions of drug exposure in the kidney from PBPK platforms such as GastroPlus, along with in vitro data related to certain kidney injury mechanisms, to make predictions. The first expected release of RENAsym will be available towards the end of 2020. The initial development is being funded via an NIH small business grant.

8

IPFsym

IPFsym is a software tool that will investigate the likelihood that various molecules might provide beneficial therapeutic benefits to treat or cure idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). IPFsym, like NAFLDsym, requires modification for each of a number of different mechanisms of action that potential new drug compounds could use to treat the disease, and so is a customized tool used in consulting projects for each new client project. IPFsym is targeted for release for licensing and consulting use sometime in 2021. The software will include simplifying the creationmost important mechanisms of plotsIPF and comparing them across multiple models, thus acceleratingwill be closely coupled with GastroPlus for drug concentration predictions within the lungs.

In January 2019 DILIsym Services and Simulations Plus entered into a two-year, $2.7 million collaboration with a large pharmaceutical company on the development of a new Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) model refinement process. In addition, analysts can now conveniently copy visualization preferences across projects, improving consistency and facilitating collaboration and communication with clients and colleagues.that will provide the ability to predict the efficacy of drugs being developed to treat idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Part of this funding will go towards expansion of GastroPlus to improve the predictions of compound exposure upon inhalation of drugs.

 

Contract Research and Consulting Services

Our scientists and engineers have expertise in drug absorption via various dosing routes (oral, intravenous, subcutaneous, intramuscular, ocular, nasal/pulmonary, and dermal), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacodynamics.drug-drug interactions. They have been speakers or presenters atattended over 150200 scientific meetings worldwide in the past four years.years, often speaking and presenting. We frequently conduct contracted consulting studies for large customers (including many of the five largesttop twenty pharmaceutical companies) who have particularly difficult problems and who recognize our expertise in solving them, as well as for smaller customers who prefer to have studies run by our scientists rather than to license our software and train someone to use it. The demand for our consulting services has been steadily increasing, and we have expanded our consulting teams to meet the increased workload.

 

We closedCurrently we are entering year four of a five-year consulting agreement with a major research foundationthe Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to implement a platform for coordinating the data generated by global teams engaged in model-based drug development and began work on the project.development.

 

We currently are working with the FDA on three different Research Collaboration Agreements (RCAs): the two funded efforts for the ocular model and long-acting injectable microspheres and the unfunded IVIVC effort, all described above under “GastroPlus”. We also successfully completed the fifth year of our five-year renewable collaboration with the Center for Food Safety and Nutrition of the FDA to develop predictive toxicity models for food additives and contaminants.

Pharmacometric Modeling

We have a reputation for high-quality analyses and regulatory reporting of data collected during preclinical experiments as well as clinical trials of new and existing pharmaceutical products, typically working on 30-4080-100 drug projects per year. TheTraditionally, the model-based analysis of clinical trial data that we perform iswas different from the modeling analysis offered by GastroPlus;GastroPlus or our quantitative systems toxicology/pharmacology software (DILIsym and NAFLDsym); the former reliesrelied more on statistical and semi-mechanistic models, whereas the latter reliesis based on very detailed mechanistic models. Statistical models rely on direct observation and mathematical equations that are used to fit data collected across multiple studies along with describing the variability within and between patients. Mechanistic models are based on a detailed understanding of the human body and the chemistry of the drug and involve deep mathematical and scientific representation of the phenomena involved in drug dissolution/precipitation, absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination. Collectively, the models guide drugsupport safety and efficacy decisions, first-in-human estimations, formulation designoptimization, and dose selection.

Because ofdrug-drug interaction assessments. Beginning in 2014, the synergies achieved throughU.S. F.D.A and other regulatory agencies began to emphasize the integration of our Buffalo division (Cognigen) into Simulations Plus, our first full fiscal year of combined operations resulted in significantly increased revenues and earnings. Our clinical pharmacometricians in Buffalo, supported by our consulting team in California, are learningneed to use thepush mechanistic PBPK modeling capabilitiesand simulation into clinical pharmacology, with final guidance documents completed in 2018, and we have seen the benefit of GastroPlus and are performing such studies under new and expanded contracts with pharmaceutical customers.

6

having our clinical pharmacology teams across all three divisions working together to achieve this goal.

  

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

Development of our software is focused on expanding product lines, designing enhancements to our core technologies, and integrating existing and new products into our principal software architecture and platform technologies. We intend to continue to offer regular updates to our products and to continue to look for opportunities to expand our existing suite of products and services.

 

To date, we have developed products internally, sometimes also licensing or acquiring products, or portions of products, from third parties. These arrangements sometimes require that we pay royalties to third parties. We intend to continue to license or otherwise acquire technology or products from third parties when it makes business sense to do so. We currently have one license agreement, with BIOVIA, a San Diego division of Dassault Systemes in France (formerly known as Accelrys, Inc.), pursuant to which a small royalty is paid to BIOVIA frombased on revenues on each license for the Metabolite moduleMetabolism Module in ADMET Predictor. This license agreement continues in perpetuity and either party has the right to terminate it.

9

 

In 1997 we entered into an exclusive software licensing agreement with TSRL, Inc. (aka Therapeutic(Therapeutic Systems Research Laboratories) (TSRL), pursuant to which TSRL licensed certain software technology and databases to us, and we paid royalties to TSRL. On May 15, 2014, we and TSRL entered into a termination and non-assertionnonassertion agreement pursuant to which the parties agreed to terminate the 1997 exclusive software licensing agreement. As a result, the Company obtained a perpetual right to use certain source code and data, and TSRL relinquished any rights and claims to any GastroPlus products and to any claims to royalties or other payments under that agreement, and we agreed to pay TSRL total consideration of $6,000,000 as follows: (a) $3,500,000 by May 20, 2014, which amount was comprised of $2,500,000 in cash and $1,000,000 worth of our common stock (which was 164,745 shares based upon the April 25, 2014 closing price per share of $6.07 per share), (b) $750,000 payable on or before April 25, 2015, (c) $750,000 payable on or before April 25, 2016, and (d) $1,000,000 payable on or before April 25, 2017.$6,000,000. All payments have now beenwere made except the final $1 million, which will be paid inas of April 2017. Our outstanding payment obligation described aboveThe total consideration is non-interest-bearing and will bebeing amortized at a constant rate of $150,000 per quarter until it is completely amortized, after which no further expense will be incurred. For most quarters, we expect thatTo date, this will resulthas resulted in aexpense savings over $1,750,000 compared to the royalty payments that would have been paid to TSRL if paid consistent with past practices.

 

MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION

We distribute our products and offer our services in North America, South America, Europe, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, India, Singapore, Taiwan, Korea, and the People’s Republic of China.

 

We market our pharmaceutical software and consulting services through attendance and presentations at scientific meetings, exhibits at trade shows, seminars at pharmaceutical companies and government agencies, through our website, and using various communication channels to our database of prospects and customers. At various scientific meetings around the world each year there are numerous presentations and posters presented in which the reported research was performed using our software. Many of these presentations are from industry and FDA scientists; some are from our staff. In addition, more than 50100 peer-reviewed scientific journal articles, posters, and podium presentations are typically published each year using our software, mostly by our customers, further supporting its use in a wide range of preclinical and clinical studies.

 

Our sales and marketing efforts are handled primarily internally by sales and marketing staff and with our scientific team and several senior management staff assisting our marketing and sales staff with trade shows, seminars, and customer trainings both online and on-site. We believe that this is more effective than a completely separate sales team for several reasons: (1) customers appreciate talking directly with software developers and consulting scientists who can answer a wide range of in-depth technical questions about methods and features; (2) our scientists and engineers gain an appreciation for the customer’s environment and problems; and (3) we believe the relationships we build through scientist-to-scientist contact are stronger than relationships built through salesperson-to-scientist contacts. We also have one independent distributordistributors in Japan, China, India, and two independent representatives in ChinaKorea who also sell and market our products with support from our scientists and engineers.

 

We provide support to the GastroPlus User Group in Japan, which was organized by Japanese researchers in 2009. In early 2013, a group of scientists in Europe and North America organized another groupGastroPlus User Group following the example set in Japan. Over 8501,000 members have joined this group to date. We support this group through coordination of online meetings each month and managing the user group web site for exchange of information among members. These user groups provide us valuable feedback with respect to desired new features and suggested interface changes.

 

PRODUCTION

 

7

PRODUCTION

Our pharmaceutical software products are designed and developed by our development teams in California, North Carolina (Research Triangle Park), and New York with locations in Lancaster, Petaluma, San Jose, San Diego, and Buffalo. In addition,(Buffalo), we have one team member working out of North Carolina and our Chief Executive Officer works primarily from Auburn, Alabama.also employee people who are able to work remotely using collaboration software. Our products and services are now delivered electronically – we no longer provide CD-ROMs and printed manuals or reports.

 

COMPETITION

In our pharmaceutical software and services business, we compete against a number of established companies that provide screening, testing and research services, and products that are not based on simulation software. There are also software companies whose products do not compete directly with, but are sometimes closely related to, ours. Our competitors in this field include some companies with financial, personnel, research, and marketing resources that are larger than ours. Our management believes thereflagship product, GastroPlus, is currently nothe most widely used commercial PBPK modeling platform and has one significant competitive threat to GastroPlus; however, in spite of acompetitor; others could be developed over time, but with the high barrier to entry, one couldit would be developed over time.difficult to validate new software to levels required to support regulatory submissions. Our new PKPlus software product will competecompetes with one major and a few minor software programs; however, the capabilities and design features of PKPlus, along with more affordable licensing, are expected to generate significant interest.programs. MedChem Studio, MedChem Designer, and ADMET Predictor/ADMET Modeler operate in a more competitive environment. Several other companies presently offer simulation or modeling software, or simulation-software-based services, to the pharmaceutical industry. We believe DILIsym and NAFLDsym enjoy a unique market position, with no significant competition.

10

 

Major pharmaceutical companies conduct drug discovery and development efforts through their internal development staffs and through outsourcing. Smaller companies generally need to outsource a greater percentage of this research. Thus, we compete not only with other software suppliers and scientific consulting service providers, but also with the in-house development and scientific consulting teams at some of the larger pharmaceutical companies.

 

Although competitive products exist, both new licenses and license renewals for GastroPlus have continued to grow. We believe that we enjoy a significantdominant market share in this segment. We believe that the successour ADMET Predictor/ADMET Modeler, MedChem Studio, MedChem Designer, DDDPlus, MembranePlus, PKPlus, KIWI, DILIsym, and NAFLDsym software offerings are each unique in their combination of capabilities and remain a focus of our two NCE projectsmarketing strategy.

Based on our technical knowledge and expertise, the Company is strategically placed to offer modeling and simulation consulting services to companies. Our clients seek out our services for multiple reasons: (1) to acquire scientific, therapeutic area related or modeling expertise that they do not have in-house, (2) to address an excess of modeling and simulation requirements beyond the capacity of in-house resources, (3) to fulfill their modeling requirements more efficiently than they could do in-house, and (4) to utilize our software when they do not have the in-house expertise to do so. We apply our software and assist companies in which we successfully designed, synthesized,such areas as:physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling (PBPK) , pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data analysis; and tested new lead moleculesquantitative systems pharmacology/toxicology (QSP/T). We compete against numerous service providers, ranging from departments within large contract research organizations (CROs) to treat malariaindependent consulting organizations of various sizes as well as COX-2/COX-1 will further promote the abilities of our ADMET Design Suite for rapid and cost-effective design of lead compounds. We expect the completely refactored ADMET Predictor 8.0 version with its fresh look and expanded features will generate increased interest in drug discovery and early drug development teams.individual consultants.

 

We believe the key factors in our ability to successfully compete in this field are our ability to: (1) continue to invest in research and development, and develop and support industry-leading simulation and modeling software and related products and services, to effectively predict activities and ADMET-related behaviors of new drug-like compounds, (2) design new molecules with acceptable activity and ADMET properties, (3) develop and maintain a proprietary database of results of physical experiments that serve as a basis for simulated studies and empirical models, (4)(3) continue to attract and retain a highly skilled scientific and engineering team, (4) aggressively promote our products and services to our global market, and (5) develop and maintain relationships with research and development departments of pharmaceutical companies, universities, and government agencies.agencies

 

WeIn addition, we actively seek strategic acquisitions to expand theboth our pharmaceutical software and services business. We plan to continue our efforts to find strategic targets and alliances that will enhance our position in the industry, and to pursue the application of our machine-learning technology to new industries.

 

TRAINING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT

Customer training and technical support are important factors in customer satisfaction for our pharmaceutical products, and we believe we are an industry leader in providing customer training and technical support in our business areas. We provide in-house seminars at customers’ and potential customers’ sites, as well at selected universities to train students who will soon be industry scientists. These seminars often serve as initial training in the event the potential customer decides to license or evaluate our software. Technical support is provided after the sale of any software in the form of on-site training (at the customer’s expense), web meetings and telephone, fax, and e-mail assistance to the customer’s users during the customer’s license period.

 

Technical support for pharmaceutical software is provided by our life sciences teamteams and our inside sales and support staff based at our headquarters facilities in Lancaster, California. We provide freevia telephone, support offering toll-free numbers in the U.S. and Canada, and e-mail and web-based support for all of our pharmaceutical software products worldwide. Technical support for pharmaceutical software products sales is minimal, averaging a few person-hours per month.

 

We provide free telephone, e-mail and web-based support for all of our pharmaceutical software products worldwide from our offices in the U.S. Technical support for pharmaceutical software is provided by our life sciences teams and our inside sales and support staff. Technical support for pharmaceutical software products is generally minimal, averaging a few person-hour product sale.

8

 

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Research and development (R&D) activities include both enhancement of existing products and development of new products. Development of new products and adding functionality to existing products are capitalized in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 985-20, “Costs of Software to Be Sold Leased, or Marketed”. R&D expenditures, which primarily relate to both capitalized and expensed salaries, R&D supplies, laboratory testing, and R&D consulting, were approximately $2,641,000$4,264,000 during fiscal year 2016,2019, of which $1,196,000$1,764,000 was capitalized. R&D expenditures were approximately $3,936,000 during fiscal year 2018, of which $2,145,000 was capitalized. R&D expenditures during fiscal year 20152017 were approximately $2,496,000 during fiscal year 2015,$2,743,000 of which $1,168,000$1,376,000 was capitalized.

 

Our pharmaceutical business R&D activities during fiscal year 2015 were focused on improving our ADMET Predictor/ADMET Modeler, MedChem Studio, MedChem Designer and GastroPlus products, as well as the development of our new MembranePlus software product described above.

 

11

CUSTOMERS

Our customers include large, medium-sized and smaller biotech and pharmaceutical companies, universities, and regulatory agencies and other government organizations. We concentrate on serving the needs of our customers in drug discovery, development, clinical trials, and post-patent generic formulation development. Our current customer base is highly fragmented, in 2019 two of our customers were each 8% and another was 7% of our revenues, with those exceptions no other customers made up more than 7% of our revenues in the last 3 years.

SEASONALITY

We have traditionally experienced seasonal revenue weakness during our fiscal fourth quarter (June-August) due to summer vacations and reduced activities at our customers’ sites. Though our net sales figures for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of sales for any future period, our pharmaceutical software is typically licensed on an annual basis which means renewals usually fall in the same quarter year after year.

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

We believe we are in compliance in all material respects with all applicable environmental laws. Presently, we do not anticipate that such compliance will have a material effect on capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position with respect to any of our operations.

EMPLOYEES

As of August 31, 2016,2019, Simulations Plus and its subsidiarysubsidiaries Cognigen Corporation and DILIsym, employed a total of 63 employees,111 persons, including 60107 full-time employees and 34 part-time employees, including 48consisting of 78 in scientific, technical and research and development, 58 in marketing and sales, 10and 25 in administration and accounting. Currently 2552 employees hold Ph.Ds. in their respective science or engineering disciplines, and 1624 employees hold one or more Master’s degrees. Most of the senior management team and the members of our Board of Directors hold graduate degrees.

 

We believe that our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to attract, hire and retain qualified personnel. We continue to seek additions to our life sciences team although the competition for such personnel in the pharmaceutical industry is intense. None of our employees is represented by a labor union, and we have never experienced a work stoppage. We believe that our relations with our employees are good.

 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND OTHER PROPRIETARY RIGHTS

We primarily protect our intellectual property through copyrights and trade secrets. Our intellectual property consists primarily of source code for computer programs and data files for various applications of those programs in the pharmaceutical software businesses. The expertise of our staff is a considerable asset closely related to intellectual property, and attracting and retaining highly qualified scientists and engineers is essential to our business.

 

EFFECT OF GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS

Our pharmaceutical software products are tools used in research and development and are neither approved nor approvable by the FDA or other government agencies.

COMPANY WEBSITE

We maintain a corporate Internet website at: www.simulations-plus.com.

The contents of this website are not incorporated in or otherwise to be regarded as part of this Annual Report. We file reports with the SEC which are available on our website free of charge. These reports include annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, “Section 16” filings on Form 3, Form 4, and Form 5, and other related filings, each of which is provided on our website as soon as reasonably practical after we electronically file such materials with or furnish them to the SEC. In addition, the SEC maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, including the Company.

12

 

ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS

 

Not applicableYou should carefully consider the risks described below before investing in our publicly traded securities. The risks described below are not the only ones facing us. Our business is also subject to the risks that affect many other companies, such as competition, technological obsolescence, labor relations, general economic conditions, geopolitical changes, and international operations. We operate in a rapidly changing environment that involves a number of risks, some of which are beyond our control. Additional risks not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial also may impair our business operations and our liquidity. The risks described below could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements we have made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the information incorporated herein by reference, and those forward-looking statements we may make from time to time. We note these factors for investors as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors. Consequently, you should not consider the following to be a complete discussion of all potential risks or uncertainties.

Certain Risks Related to Our Marketplace and Environment

Our ability to sustain or increase revenues will depend upon our success in entering new markets, continuing to increase our customer base, and in deriving additional revenues from our existing customers.

Our products are currently used primarily by molecular modeling and simulation specialists in pharmaceutical, biotechnology, agrotech, cosmetics, and government research organizations. One component of our overall business strategy is to derive more revenues from our existing customers by expanding their use of our products and services. Such strategy would have our customers utilize our scientific informatics platforms and our tools and components to leverage vast amounts of information stored in both corporate databases and public data sources in order to make informed scientific and business decisions during the research and development process. In addition, we seek to expand into new markets, and new areas within our existing markets, by acquiring businesses in these markets, attracting and retaining personnel knowledgeable in these markets, identifying the needs of these markets, and developing marketing programs to address these needs. If successfully implemented, these strategies would increase the usage of our software and services by biologists, chemists, engineers, and informaticians operating within our existing pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and chemical customers, as well as by new customers in other industries. However, if our strategies are not successfully implemented, our products and services may not achieve market acceptance or penetration in targeted new departments within our existing customers or in new industries. As a result, we may incur additional costs and expend additional resources without being able to sustain or increase revenue.

Consolidation within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may continue to lead to fewer potential customers for our products and services.

A significant portion of our customer base consists of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. Consolidation within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in fewer customers for our products and services. Although the industry consolidation that has taken place over the past 20 years has not prevented our business from growing to date, if one of the parties to a consolidation uses the products or services of our competitors, we may lose existing customers as a result of such consolidation.

Increasing competition and increasing costs within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may affect the demand for our products and services, which may affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our pharmaceutical and biotechnology customers' demand for our products is impacted by continued demand for their products and by our customers' research and development costs. Demand for our customers' products could decline, and prices charged by our customers for their products may decline, as a result of increasing competition, including competition from companies manufacturing generic drugs. In addition, our customers' expenses could continue to increase as a result of increasing costs of complying with government regulations and other factors. A decrease in demand for our customers' products, pricing pressures associated with the sales of these products and additional costs associated with product development could cause our customers to reduce research and development expenditures. Although our products increase productivity and reduce costs in many areas, because our products and services depend on such research and development expenditures, our revenues may be significantly reduced.

13

Health care reform and restrictions on reimbursement may affect the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and industrial chemical companies that purchase or license our products or services, which may affect our results of operations and financial condition.

The continuing efforts of government and third-party payers in the markets we serve to contain or reduce the cost of health care may reduce the profitability of pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and industrial chemical companies, causing them to reduce research and development expenditures. Because some of our products and services depend on such research and development expenditures, our revenues may be significantly reduced. We cannot predict what actions federal, state, or private payers for health care goods and services may take in response to any health care reform proposals or legislation.

We face strong competition in the life science market for computer-aided design modeling and simulation software and for cheminformatics products.

The market for our computer-aided design modeling and simulation software products for the life science market is intensely competitive. We currently face competition from other scientific software providers, larger technology and solutions companies, in-house development by our customers and academic and government institutions, and the open source community. Some of our competitors and potential competitors have longer operating histories in certain segments of our industry than we do and could have greater financial, technical, marketing, research and development, and other resources. Many of our competitors offer products and services directed at more specific markets than those we target, enabling these competitors to focus a greater proportion of their efforts and resources on these markets. Some offerings that compete with our products are developed and made available at lower cost by government organizations and academic institutions, and these entities may be able to devote substantial resources to product development and also offer their products to users for little or no charge. We could also face competition from open source software initiatives, in which developers provide software and intellectual property free over the Internet. In addition, some of our customers spend significant internal resources in order to develop their own software. Moreover, we intend to leverage our scientific informatics platform in order to enable our customers to more effectively utilize the vast amounts of information stored in both their databases and public data sources in order to make informed scientific and business decisions during the research and development process. This strategy could lead to competition from much larger companies that provide general data storage and management software. There can be no assurance that our current or potential competitors will not develop products, services, or technologies that are comparable to, superior to, or render obsolete, the products, services, and technologies we offer. There can be no assurance that our competitors will not adapt more quickly than we to technological advances and customer demands, thereby increasing such competitors' market share relative to ours. Any material decrease in demand for our technologies or services may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We are subject to pricing pressures in some of the markets we serve.

The market for computer-aided design modeling and simulation products for the life science industry is intensely competitive. Although the average price of our software licenses has increased slightly or remained relatively constant for fiscal 2017, 2018, and 2019, we may experience a decline in the future. In response to increased competition and general adverse economic conditions in this market, we may be required to modify our pricing practices. Changes in our pricing model could adversely affect our revenue and earnings.

Our operations may be interrupted by the occurrence of a natural disaster or other catastrophic event at our primary facilities.

Our research and development operations and administrative functions are primarily conducted at our facilities in Lancaster, California, Buffalo, New York and Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Although we have contingency plans in effect for natural disasters or other catastrophic events, the occurrence of such events could still disrupt our operations. For example, our Lancaster, California facility is located in a state that is particularly susceptible to earthquakes. Any natural disaster or catastrophic event in our facilities or the areas in which they are located could have a significant negative impact on our operations.

Our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to avoid material impact on our financial position or results of operations resulting from claims or liabilities against us, and we may not be able to obtain insurance coverage in the future.

We maintain insurance coverage for protection against many risks of liability. The extent of our insurance coverage is under continuous review and is modified as we deem it necessary. Despite this insurance, it is possible that claims or liabilities against us may have a material adverse impact on our financial position or results of operations. In addition, we may not be able to obtain any insurance coverage, or adequate insurance coverage, when our existing insurance coverage expires. For example, we do not carry earthquake insurance for our facilities in Lancaster, California, because we do not believe the costs of such insurance are reasonable in relation to the potential risk for our part of California.

14

Changes in government regulation or in practices relating to the pharmaceutical or biotechnology industries, including potential health care reform, could decrease the need for the services we provide.

Governmental agencies throughout the world, but particularly in the U.S., strictly regulate the drug development process. Our business involves helping pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, among others, navigate the regulatory drug approval process. Accordingly, many regulations, and often new regulations, are expected to result in higher regulatory standards and often additional revenues for companies that service these industries. However, some changes in regulations, such as a smaller reporting company.relaxation in regulatory requirements or the introduction of streamlined or expedited drug approval procedures, or an increase in regulatory requirements that we have difficulty satisfying or that make our services less competitive, could eliminate or substantially reduce the demand for our services.

Any negative commentaries made by any regulatory agencies or any failure by us to comply with applicable regulations and related guidance could harm our reputation and operating results, and compliance with new regulations and guidance may result in additional costs.

Any negative commentaries made by any regulatory agencies or any failure on our part to comply with applicable regulations could result in the termination of ongoing research or the disqualification of data for submission to regulatory authorities. This could harm our reputation, our prospects for future work, and our operating results. If our operations are found to violate any applicable law or other governmental regulations, we might be subject to civil and criminal penalties, damages, and fines. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses, divert our management's attention from the operation of our business, and damage our reputation.

Many of our contracts are fixed-price and may be delayed or terminated or reduced in scope for reasons beyond our control, or we may underprice or overrun cost estimates with these contracts, potentially resulting in financial losses.

Many of our contracts provide for services on a fixed-price or fee-for-service with a cap basis and, accordingly, we bear the financial risk if we initially underprice our contracts or otherwise overrun our cost estimates. In addition, these contracts may be terminated or reduced in scope either immediately or upon notice. Cancellations may occur for a variety of reasons, and often at the discretion of the client. The loss, reduction in scope, or delay of a large contract or the loss or delay of multiple contracts could materially adversely affect our business, although our contracts frequently entitle us to receive the costs of winding down the terminated projects, as well as all fees earned by us up to the time of termination. Some contracts also entitle us to a predetermined termination fee and irrevocably committed costs/expenses.

We could experience a breach of the confidentiality of the information we hold or of the security of our computer systems.

We operate large and complex computer systems that contain significant amounts of client data. As a routine element of our business, we collect, analyze, and retain substantial amounts of data pertaining to the clinical study data analysis we conduct for our clients. Unauthorized third parties could attempt to gain entry to such computer systems for the purpose of stealing data or disrupting the systems. We believe that we have taken appropriate measures to protect them from intrusion, and we continue to improve and enhance our systems in this regard, but in the event that our efforts are unsuccessful, we could suffer significant harm. Our contracts with our clients typically contain provisions that require us to keep confidential the information generated from these studies. In the event the confidentiality of such information was compromised, we could suffer significant harm.

Impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets may adversely impact future results of operations.

We have intangible assets, including goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles, on our balance sheet due to our acquisitions of businesses. The initial identification and valuation of these intangible assets and the determination of the estimated useful lives at the time of acquisition involve use of management judgments and estimates. These estimates are based on, among other factors, input from accredited valuation consultants, reviews of projected future income cash flows and statutory regulations. The use of alternative estimates and assumptions might have increased or decreased the estimated fair value of our goodwill and other intangible assets that could potentially result in a different impact to our results of operations. If the future growth and operating results of our business are not as strong as anticipated and/or our market capitalization declines, this could impact the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of goodwill or other indefinite-lived intangibles. To the extent goodwill or other indefinite-lived intangibles are impaired, their carrying value will be written down to its implied fair value and a charge will be made to our income from continuing operations. Such an impairment charge could materially and adversely affect our operating results. As of August 31, 2019, the carrying amount of goodwill and other intangibles was $10,387,198 on our consolidated balance sheet.

15

Certain Risks Related to Our Operations

Software defects or malfunctions in our products could hurt our reputation among our customers, result in delayed or lost revenue, and expose us to liability.

Our business and the level of customer acceptance of our products depend upon the continuous, effective, and reliable operation of our software and related tools and functions. To the extent that defects cause our software to malfunction and our customers' use of our products is interrupted, our reputation could suffer and our revenue could decline or be delayed while such defects are remedied. We may also be subject to liability for the defects and malfunctions of third-party technology partners and others with whom our products and services are integrated.

Delays in the release of new or enhanced products or services or undetected errors in our products or services may result in increased cost to us, delayed market acceptance of our products, and delayed or lost revenue.

To achieve market acceptance, new or enhanced products or services can require long development and testing periods, which may result in delays in scheduled introduction. Any delays in the release schedule for new or enhanced products or services may delay market acceptance of these products or services and may result in delays in new customer orders for these new or enhanced products or services or the loss of customer orders. In addition, new or enhanced products or services may contain a number of undetected errors or “bugs” when they are first released. Although we extensively test each new or enhanced software product or service before it is released to the market, there can be no assurance that significant errors will not be found in existing or future releases. As a result, in the months following the introduction of certain releases, we may need to devote significant resources to correct these errors. There can be no assurance, however, that all of these errors can be corrected.

We are subject to risks associated with the operation of a global business.

We derive a significant portion of our total revenue from our operations in international markets. During the years ended August 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 34%, 39% and 38% respectively, of our total revenue was derived from our international operations. Our global business may be affected by local economic conditions, including inflation, recession, and currency exchange rate fluctuations. In addition, political and economic changes, including international conflicts, including terrorist acts, throughout the world may interfere with our or our customers' activities in particular locations and result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results. Potential trade restrictions, exchange controls, adverse tax consequences, and legal restrictions may affect the repatriation of funds into the U.S. Also, we could be subject to unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, the difficulties of compliance with a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations, potentially negative consequences from changes in or interpretations of U.S. and foreign tax laws, import and export licensing requirements, and longer accounts receivable cycles in certain foreign countries. These risks, individually or in the aggregate, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. For example, we are subject to compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar anti-bribery laws, which generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to foreign government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. While our employees, distributors, and agents are required to comply with these laws, we cannot be sure that our internal policies and procedures will always protect us from violations of these laws despite our commitment to legal compliance and corporate ethics. The occurrence or allegation of these types of risks may adversely affect our business, performance, prospects, value, financial condition, and results of operations.

The drug discovery and development services industry is highly competitive.

Our clinical pharmacology division often competes for business not only with other clinical research organization (CROs), but also with internal discovery and development departments within our larger clients, who may have greater resources than ours. We also compete with universities and teaching hospitals for outsourced services. We compete based on a variety of factors, including:

·reputation for on-time quality performance;
·reputation for regulatory compliance;
·expertise and experience in multiple specialized areas;
·scope and breadth of service and product offerings across the drug discovery and development spectrum;
·ability to provide flexible and customized solutions to support our clients' drug discovery and development needs;
·price/value;
·technological expertise and efficient drug development processes;
·financial stability;
·accessibility of client data through secure portals; and
·ability to acquire, process, analyze, and report data in an accurate manner.

16

If we do not compete successfully, our business could suffer. Increased competition might lead to price and other concessions that might adversely affect our operating results. The drug discovery and development services industry has continued to see a trend towards consolidation, particularly among biotechnology companies, who are targets for each other and for larger pharmaceutical companies. If this trend continues, it is likely to produce more competition among the larger companies and CROs generally, with respect to both clients and acquisition candidates. In addition, while there are substantial barriers to entry for large, global competitors with broad-based services, small, specialized entities considering entering the CRO industry will continue to find lower barriers to entry, and private equity firms may determine that there are opportunities to acquire and consolidate these companies, thus further increasing possible competition. More generally, our competitors or others might develop technologies, services, or products that are more effective or commercially attractive than our current or future technologies, services, or products, or that render our technologies, services, or products less competitive or obsolete. If competitors introduce superior technologies, services, or products and we cannot make enhancements to ours to remain competitive, our competitive position, and in turn our business, revenue, and financial condition, would be materially and adversely affected. In the aggregate, these competitive pressures may affect the attractiveness of our technologies, services, or products and could adversely affect our financial results.

Potential changes in U.S. and international tax law.

Tax proposals to reform corporate tax law are constantly being considered. Proposals include both increasing and reducing the corporate statutory tax rate, broadening the corporate tax base through the elimination or reduction of deductions, exclusions, and credits, implementing a territorial regime of taxation, limiting the ability of U.S. corporations to deduct interest expense associated with offshore earnings, modifying the foreign tax credit rules, and reducing the ability to defer U.S. tax on offshore earnings. These or other changes in the U.S. tax laws could increase our effective tax rate, which would affect our profitablity.

Contract research services create a risk of liability.

As a CRO, we face a range of potential liabilities which may include:

·Errors or omissions in reporting of study detail in preclinical studies that may lead to inaccurate reports, which may undermine the usefulness of a study or data from the study, or which may potentially advance studies absent the necessary support or inhibit studies from proceeding to the next level of testing; and
·Risks associated with our possible failure to properly care for our clients' property, such as research models, records, work in progress, or other archived materials.

Contractual risk transfer indemnifications generally do not protect us against liability arising from certain of our own actions, such as negligence or misconduct. We could be materially and adversely affected if we are required to pay damages or bear the costs of defending any claim that is outside any contractual indemnification provision, or if a party does not fulfill its indemnification obligations, or the damage is beyond the scope or level of insurance coverage. We also often contractually indemnify our clients (subject to a limitation of liability), similar to the way they indemnify us, and we may be materially adversely affected if we have to fulfill our indemnity obligations. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that we nor a party required to indemnify us will be able to maintain such insurance coverage (either at all or on terms acceptable to us).

Upgrading our software could result in implementation issues and business disruptions.

We update our software on a regular basis and in the process of refactoring our software programs. In doing so we face the possibility that existing users will find the software unacceptable, or new users may not be as interested as they have been in the past versions. Translation errors might introduce new software bugs that will not be caught.

17

The drug discovery and development industry has a history of patent and other intellectual property litigation, and we might be involved in costly intellectual property lawsuits.

The drug discovery and development industry has a history of patent and other intellectual property litigation and these lawsuits will likely continue. Accordingly, we face potential patent infringement suits by companies that have patents for similar products and methods used in business or other suits alleging infringement of their intellectual property rights. Legal proceedings relating to intellectual property could be expensive, take significant time and divert management's attention from other business concerns, whether we win or lose. If we do not prevail in an infringement lawsuit brought against us, we might have to pay substantial damages, including treble damages, and we could be required to stop the infringing activity or obtain a license to use technology on unfavorable terms.

We may not be able to successfully develop and market new services and products.

We may seek to develop and market new services and products that complement or expand our existing business or service offerings. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to identify new technologies of interest to our customers. Even if we are able to identify new technologies of interest, we may not be able to negotiate license agreements on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to develop new services and products and/or create demand for those newly developed services and products, our future business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows could be adversely affected.

Ability to incur debt could adversely affect our business and growth prospects.

At August 31, 2019, we had no borrowed debt and have no need to do so to fund normal operations in the foreseeable future; however, should circumstances require us to incur debt and a lender could not be found to provide that debt, this could have a significant adverse effect on our business, including making it more difficult for us to obtain financing on favorable terms, limiting our ability to capitalize on significant business opportunities, and making us more vulnerable to rising interest rates.

We depend on key personnel and may not be able to retain these employees or recruit additional qualified personnel, which could harm our business.

Our success depends to a significant extent on the continued services of our senior management and other members of management. We have employment agreements with our CEO and division presidents that range from one to three years. If our CEO, our division presidents, or other members of senior management do not continue in their present positions, our business may suffer. Because of the specialized scientific nature of our business, we are highly dependent upon attracting and retaining qualified scientific and technical and managerial personnel. While we have a strong record of employee retention, there is still significant competition for qualified personnel in the software, pharmaceutical and biotechnology fields. Therefore, we may not be able to attract and retain the qualified personnel necessary for the development of our business. The loss of the services of existing personnel, as well as the failure to recruit additional key scientific, technical, and managerial personnel in a timely manner, could harm our business.

If we are not successful in selecting and integrating the businesses and technologies we acquire, or in managing our current and future divestitures, our business may suffer.

Over the years, we have expanded our business through acquisitions. We continue to search to acquire businesses and technologies and form strategic alliances. However, businesses and technologies may not be available on terms and conditions we find acceptable. We risk spending time and money investigating and negotiating with potential acquisition or alliance partners, but not completing transactions. Even if completed, acquisitions and alliances involve numerous risks which may include: difficulties in achieving business and continuing financial success; difficulties and expenses incurred in assimilating and integrating operations, services, products, technologies, or pre-existing relationships with our customers, distributors, and suppliers; challenges with developing and operating new businesses, including those which are materially different from our existing businesses and which may require the development or acquisition of new internal capabilities and expertise; challenges of maintaining staffing at the acquired entities, including loss of key employees; potential losses resulting from undiscovered liabilities of acquired companies that are not covered by the indemnification we may obtain from the seller(s); the presence or absence of adequate internal controls and/or significant fraud in the financial systems of acquired companies; diversion of management's attention from other business concerns; acquisitions could be dilutive to earnings, or in the event of acquisitions made through the issuance of our common stock to the shareholders of the acquired company, dilutive to the percentage of ownership of our existing shareholders; new technologies and products may be developed which cause businesses or assets we acquire to become less valuable; and risks that disagreements or disputes with prior owners of an acquired business, technology, service, or product may result in litigation expenses and distribution of our management's attention. In the event that an acquired business or technology or an alliance does not meet our expectations, our results of operations may be adversely affected.

18

Some of the same risks exist when we decide to sell a business, site, or product line. In addition, divestitures could involve additional risks, including the following: difficulties in the separation of operations, services, products, and personnel; and the need to agree to retain or assume certain current or future liabilities in order to complete the divestiture. We evaluate the performance and strategic fit of our businesses. These and any divestitures may result in significant write-offs, including those related to goodwill and other intangible assets, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, we may encounter difficulty in finding buyers or alternative exit strategies at acceptable prices and terms and in a timely manner. We may not be successful in managing these or any other significant risks that we encounter in divesting a business, site, or product line, and as a result, we may not achieve some or all of the expected benefits of the divestitures.

Our quarterly and annual operating results fluctuate and may continue to fluctuate in the future, and if we fail to meet the expectations of analysts or investors, our stock price and the value of your investment could decline substantially.

We believe that operating results for any particular quarter are not necessarily a meaningful indication of future results. Nonetheless, fluctuations in our quarterly operating results could negatively affect the market price of our common stock. Our results of operations in any quarter or annual period have varied in the past and may vary from quarter to quarter or year to year and are influenced by such factors as:

·changes in the general global economy;
·the number and scope of ongoing client engagements; the commencement, postponement, delay, progress, completion, or cancellation of client contracts in the quarter;
·changes in customer budget cycles;
·the number and scope of ongoing client engagements;
·the commencement, postponement, delay, progress, completion, or cancellation of client contracts in the quarter;
·changes in the mix of our products and services;
·competitive pricing pressures;
·the extent of cost overruns;
·buying patterns of our clients;
·budget cycles of our clients;
·the effect of potential acquisitions and consequent integration;
·the timing of new product releases by us or our competitors;
·general economic factors, including factors relating to disruptions in the world credit and equity markets and the related impact on our customers’ access to capital;
·changes in tax laws, rules, regulations, and tax rates in the locations in which we operate;
·the timing and charges associated with completed acquisitions and other events;
·the financial performance of the limited partnerships in which we invest; and
·exchange rate fluctuations.

We derive a significant percentage of our revenues from a concentrated group of customers and the loss of more than one of our major customers could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Three customers accounted for 8%, 8% and 7% (a dealer account in Japan representing various customers) of net sales for fiscal year 2019. Four customers accounted for 9% (a dealer account in Japan representing various customers), 7%, 6% and 5% of net sales for fiscal year 2018. Three customers accounted for 7% (a dealer account in Japan representing various customers), 7%, and 5% of net sales for fiscal year 2017. The loss of any of our major customers could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. We may not be able to maintain our customer relationships, and our customers may delay payment under, or fail to renew, their agreements with us, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, or financial condition. Any reduction in the amount of revenues that we derive from these customers, without an offsetting increase in new sales to other customers, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. A significant change in the liquidity or financial position of our customers could also have a material adverse effect on the collectability of our accounts receivable, our liquidity, and our future operating results.

19

A significant portion of our operating expenses is relatively fixed and planned expenditures are based in part on expectations regarding future revenues.

Accordingly, unexpected revenue shortfalls may decrease our gross margins and could cause significant changes in our operating results from year to year. As a result, in future quarters our operating results could fall below the expectations of securities analysts or investors, in which event our stock price would likely decrease.

If our customers cancel their contracts or terminate or delay their clinical trials, we may lose or delay revenues and our business may be harmed.

Certain of our customer contracts are subject to cancellation by our customers at any time with limited notice. Customers engaged in clinical trials may terminate or delay a clinical trial for various reasons, including the failure of the tested product to satisfy safety or efficacy requirements, unexpected or undesired clinical results, decisions to deemphasize a particular product or forgo a particular clinical trial, decisions to downsize clinical development programs, insufficient patient enrollment or investigator recruitment, and production problems resulting in shortages of required clinical supplies. Any termination or delay in the clinical trials would likely result in a consequential delay or termination in those customers’ service contracts. We have experienced terminations and delays of our customer service contracts in the past (although no such past terminations have had a significant impact on our results of operations) and we expect to experience additional terminations and delays in the future. The termination of single-study arrangements could result in decreased revenues and the delay of our customers’ clinical trials could result in delayed professional services revenues, which could materially harm our business.

If our security is breached, our business could be disrupted, our operating results could be harmed, and customers could be deterred from using our products and services.

Our business relies on the secure electronic transmission, storage, and hosting of sensitive information, including clinical data, financial information, and other sensitive information relating to our customers, company, and workforce. As a result, we face some risk of a deliberate or unintentional incident involving unauthorized access to our computer systems (including, among other methods, cyber- attacks or social engineering) that could result in misappropriation or loss of assets or sensitive information, data corruption, or other disruption of business operations. In light of this risk, we have devoted significant resources to protecting and maintaining the confidentiality of our information, including implementing security and privacy programs and controls, training our workforce, and implementing new technology. We have no guarantee that these programs and controls will be adequate to prevent all possible security threats. We believe that any compromise of our electronic systems, including the unauthorized access, use, or disclosure of sensitive information or a significant disruption of our computing assets and networks, would adversely affect our reputation and our ability to fulfill contractual obligations, and would require us to devote significant financial and other resources to mitigate such problems, and could increase our future cyber security costs. Moreover, unauthorized access, use, or disclosure of such sensitive information could result in contractual or other liability. In addition, any real or perceived compromise of our security or disclosure of sensitive information may result in lost revenues by deterring customers from using or purchasing our products and services in the future or prompting them to use competing service providers.

Any failure by us to properly protect customer data we possess or are deemed to possess in connection with the conduct of clinical trials, could subject us to significant liability.

Our customers use our solutions to collect, manage, and report information in connection with the conduct of clinical trials. This information may be considered our customers’ proprietary information. Since we receive and process our customers’ data from customers utilizing our hosted solutions, there is a risk that we could be liable if there were a breach of any obligation to a protected person under contract, standard of practice, or regulatory requirement. If we fail to properly protect our customers’ data that is in our possession or deemed to be in our possession, we could be subjected to significant liability and our reputation would be harmed.

We rely upon a single internal hosting facility and Amazon Web Services to deliver our solutions to our customers and any disruption of or interference with our hosting systems, operations, or use of the Amazon Web Services could harm our business and results of operations.

Substantially all of the computer hardware necessary to deliver our CRO and KIWI solutions is located at our internal hosting facility in Buffalo, New York. In addition to our dedicated hosting facility, we utilize third-party cloud computing services from Amazon Web Services ("AWS") to help us efficiently scale our cloud-based solutions and provide training. Because we cannot easily switch our AWS-serviced operations to another cloud provider, any disruption of or interference with our use of AWS would impact our operations, and our business would be adversely impacted. Our systems and operations or those of AWS could suffer damage or interruption from human error, fire, flood, power loss, telecommunications failure, break-ins, terrorist attacks, acts of war, and similar events. The occurrence of a natural disaster, an act of terrorism or other unanticipated problems at our or AWS' hosting facilities could result in lengthy interruptions in our service. Although we and AWS maintain backup facilities and disaster recovery services in the event of a system failure, these may be insufficient or fail. Any system failure, including network, software, or hardware failure, that causes an interruption in our Buffalo data center or our use of AWS or that causes a decrease in responsiveness of our cloud-based solutions could damage our reputation and cause us to lose customers, which could harm our business and results of operations. Our business may be harmed if our customers and potential customers believe our service is unreliable.

20

Defects or errors in our software applications could harm our reputation, result in significant cost to us and impair our ability to market our solutions.

Our software applications are inherently complex and may contain defects or errors, some of which may be material. Errors may result from our own technology or from the interface of our cloud-based solutions with legacy systems and data, which we did not develop. The risk of errors is particularly significant when a new product is first introduced or when new versions or enhancements of existing products are released. The likelihood of errors is increased when we do more frequent releases of new products and enhancements of existing products. We have, from time to time, found defects in our solutions. Although these past defects have not resulted in any litigation against us to date, we have invested significant capital, technical, managerial, and other resources to investigate and correct these past defects and we have needed to divert these resources from other development efforts. In addition, material performance problems or defects in our solutions may arise in the future. Material defects in our cloud-based solutions could result in a reduction in sales, delay in market acceptance of our solutions, or credits or refunds to our customers. In addition, such defects may lead to the loss of existing customers and difficulty in attracting new customers, diversion of development resources, or harm to our reputation. Correction of defects or errors could prove to be impossible or impractical. The costs incurred in correcting any defects or errors or in responding to resulting claims or liability may be substantial and could adversely affect our operating results.

If we are not able to reliably meet our data storage and management requirements, or if we experience any failure or interruption in the delivery of our services over the Internet, customer satisfaction and our reputation could be harmed and customer contracts may be terminated.

As part of our current business model, we deliver our software over the Internet and store and manage hundreds of terabytes of data for our customers, resulting in substantial information technology infrastructure and ongoing technological challenges, which we expect to continue to increase over time. If we do not reliably meet these data storage and management requirements, or if we experience any failure or interruption in the delivery of our services over the Internet, customer satisfaction and our reputation could be harmed, leading to reduced revenues and increased expenses. Our hosting services are subject to service-level agreements and, in the event that we fail to meet guaranteed service or performance levels, we could be subject to customer credits or termination of these customer contracts. If the cost of meeting these data storage and management requirements increases, our results of operations could be harmed.

Some of our software solutions and services utilize open source software, and any failure to comply with the terms of one or more of these open source licenses could adversely affect our business.

Some of our software solutions utilize software covered by open source licenses. Open source software is typically freely accessible, usable and modifiable, and is used by our development team in an effort to reduce development costs and speed up the development process. Certain open source software licenses require a user who intends to distribute the open source software as a component of the user's software to disclose publicly part or all of the source code to the user's software. In addition, certain open source software licenses require the user of such software to make any derivative works of the open source code available to others on unfavorable terms or at no cost. This can subject previously proprietary software to open source license terms. While we monitor the use of all open source software in our products, processes and technology and try to ensure that no open source software is used in such a way as to require us to disclose or make available the source code to the related product or solution, such use could inadvertently occur. This could harm our intellectual property position and have a material adverse effect on our business.

We may be unable to adequately enforce or defend our ownership and use of our intellectual property and other proprietary rights.

Our success is heavily dependent upon our intellectual property and other proprietary rights. We rely upon a combination of trademark, trade secret, copyright, patent, and unfair competition laws, as well as license and access agreements and other contractual provisions, to protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights. In addition, we attempt to protect our intellectual property and proprietary information by requiring certain of our employees and consultants to enter into confidentiality, non-competition, and assignment-of-inventions agreements. The steps we take to protect these rights may not be adequate to prevent misappropriation of our technology by third parties, or may not be adequate under the laws of some foreign countries, which may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Our attempts to protect our intellectual property may be challenged by others or invalidated through administrative process or litigation, and agreement terms that address non-competition are difficult to enforce in many jurisdictions and may not be enforceable in any particular case. In addition, there remains the possibility that others will “reverse engineer” our products in order to introduce competing products, or that others will develop competing technology independently. If we resort to legal proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rights or to determine the validity and scope of the intellectual property or other proprietary rights of others, the proceedings could be burdensome and expensive, even if we were to prevail. The failure to adequately protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

21

Current and future litigation against us, which may arise in the ordinary course of our business, could be costly and time consuming to defend.

We are subject to claims that arise in the ordinary course of business, such as claims brought by our customers in connection with commercial disputes and employment claims made by our current or former employees. Third parties may in the future assert intellectual property rights to technologies that are important to our business and demand back royalties or demand that we license their technology. Litigation may result in substantial costs and may divert management’s attention and resources, which may seriously harm our business, overall financial condition, and operating results. Insurance may not cover such claims, may not be sufficient for one or more such claims, and may not continue to be available on terms acceptable to us. A claim brought against us that is uninsured or underinsured could result in unanticipated costs, negatively affecting our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

We could incur substantial costs resulting from product liability claims relating to our products or services or our customers’ use of our products or services.

Any failure or errors in a customer’s clinical trial caused or allegedly caused by our products or services could result in a claim for substantial damages against us by our customers or the clinical trial participants, regardless of our responsibility for the failure. Although we are generally entitled to indemnification under our customer contracts against claims brought against us by third parties arising out of our customers’ use of our products, we might find ourselves entangled in lawsuits against us that, even if unsuccessful, may divert our resources and energy and adversely affect our business. Further, in the event we seek indemnification from a customer, a court may not enforce our indemnification right if the customer challenges it or the customer may not be able to fund any amounts for indemnification owed to us. In addition, our existing insurance coverage may not continue to be available on reasonable terms or may not be available in amounts sufficient to cover one or more large claims, or the insurer may disclaim coverage as to any future claim.

Our Buffalo Subsidiary (Cognigen) depends on the clinical trial market, and a downturn in this market could cause our revenues to decrease.

Our Buffalo business depends entirely on the clinical trials conducted or sponsored by pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies, CROs, and other entities. Our revenues may decline as a result of conditions affecting these industries, including general economic downturns, increased consolidation, decreased competition, or fewer products under development. Other developments that may affect these industries and harm our operating results include product liability claims, changes in government regulation, changes in governmental price controls or third-party reimbursement practices, and changes in medical practices. Disruptions in the world credit and equity markets may also result in a global downturn in spending on research and development and clinical trials and may impact our customers’ access to capital and their ability to pay for our solutions. Any decrease in research and development expenditures or in the size, scope, or frequency of clinical trials could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, or financial condition.

As a public company, we may incur significant administrative workload and expenses in connection with new and changing compliance requirements.

As a public company with common stock listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market, we must comply with various laws, regulations and requirements. New laws and regulations, as well as changes to existing laws and regulations affecting public companies, including the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, and rules adopted by the SEC and by The Nasdaq Capital Market, may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management's time and attention as we respond to new requirements.

We have been paying quarterly dividends on our common stock, and although there has been a consistent track record of paying these dividends, the Board of Directors may suspend the dividend, and, consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our common stock.

Should the Board of Directors suspend the dividend and decide to use those funds to invest more into the business, you may not receive any dividends on your investment in our common stock for the foreseeable future and the success of an investment in shares of our common stock will depend upon any future appreciation in its value. Shares of our common stock may depreciate in value or may not appreciate in value.

22

The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly and investors could lose all or part of their investments.

Shares of our common stock were sold in our initial public offering ("IPO") in 1996 at a price of $1.25 per share (on a post-split basis), and our common stock has subsequently traded as high as $41.95 and as low as $0.38 from our IPO through August 31, 2019. However, an active, liquid, and orderly market for our common stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market or otherwise may not be sustained, which could depress the trading price of our common stock. The trading price of our common stock may be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:

·our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other companies in our industry;
·announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts or acquisitions;
·changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations, or principles;
·general economic and stock market conditions, including disruptions in the world credit and equity markets;
·the failure of securities analysts to cover our common stock or changes in financial estimates by analysts;
·future sales of our common stock; and
·the other factors described in these “Risk Factors.”

In recent years, the stock market in general, and the market for technology-related companies in particular, has experienced wide price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant impact on the market price of securities issued by many companies, including companies in our industry. The price of our common stock could fluctuate based upon factors that have little to do with our performance, and these fluctuations could materially reduce our stock price.

In the past, some companies, including companies in our industry, have had volatile market prices for their securities and have had securities class action suits filed against them. The filing of a lawsuit against us, regardless of the outcome, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations, as it could result in substantial legal costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

 

ITEM 1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

None.

 

ITEM 2 –PROPERTIES– PROPERTIES 

 

We lease approximately 13,500 square feet of office space in Lancaster, California. The original lease had a five-year term with two, three-year options to extend. The initial five-year term expired in February 2011, and we extended the lease to February 2, 2014. In June 2013, the lease was amended to extend the term to February 2, 2017. The amended lease also provides for an annual base rent increase of 3% per year and two, two-year options to extend. In May 2016 the Company exercised the two, two-year options extending the term of the lease through February 2, 2021 at a fixed rate of $25,000 per month. The new extension agreement gives the Company the right, upon 90 days’ prior notice, to terminate the lease in the last two years of the term upon payment of a recapture payment equal to the 3% base payment increase that would have been due under the original agreement.

 

9

Our Buffalo subsidiary leases approximately 12,22512,623 square feet of office space in Buffalo, New York. The initial five-year term expiresexpired in October 2018; the lease allows2018 and was renewed for a three-year option to extendextending it to October 2021. The currentnew base rent is $15,638$16,147 per month.

In September 2017 DILIsym Services, Inc. signed a 3-year lease for approximately 1,900 rentable square feet of space in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. The initial three-year term expires in October 2020. The base rent is $3,975 per month with an annual 3% adjustment. Prior to this lease DILIsym was on a month-to-month rental.

  

Rent expense, including common area maintenance fees for the fiscal years ended August 31, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 was $491,800$584,000, $567,000, and $488,888,$509,600, respectively.

 

The Company believes its existing facilities and equipment are in good operating condition and are suitable for the conduct of its business.

23

 

ITEM 3 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

Except as described below, weWe are not a party to any legal proceedings and are not aware of pending legal proceedings of any kind.proceedings.

In June 2014, the Company was served with a complaint in a civil action entitled Sherri Winslow v. Incredible Adventures, Inc., et al. (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC545789) alleging wrongful death and seeking unspecified damages arising out of a May 18, 2012 plane crash in the State of Nevada. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer owns the subject aircraft and is also a named defendant. The complaint alleged that the Company was the owner of the subject aircraft. The Company denies all material allegations against it, including that it owns or has ever owned any interest in the subject aircraft. On November 25, 2014, the plaintiff and the Company signed a stipulation of dismissal pursuant to which the plaintiff agreed to dismiss the Company without prejudice. The Company planned to prepare a dismissal with prejudice to be signed on behalf of the plaintiff in the event the plaintiff did not discover evidence during a nine month period to and including August 31, 2015 that justified bringing the Company back into the litigation. The Company did not receive any notification of any such discovery and is in the process of preparing documents for the plaintiff’s final dismissal with prejudice.

 

ITEM 4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

 

Not applicable.

 

 1024 

 

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5 – MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

The Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, trades on the NASDAQNasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “SLP.”

 

Price Range of Common Stock

 

The following table shows high and low and high sales priceprices for the Company’s common stock for each quarter during the last eightpast two fiscal quarters.years:

 

   Low Sales Price  High Sales Price 
FY15:       
 Quarter ended August 31, 2015   5.67   6.82 
 Quarter ended May 31, 2015   5.65   6.30 
 Quarter ended February 28, 2015   6.18   6.88 
 Quarter ended November 30, 2014   5.87   7.00 
 FY16:         
 Quarter ended August 31, 2016   6.73   8.68 
 Quarter ended May 31, 2016   7.61   9.60 
 Quarter ended February 29, 2016   8.86   11.34 
 Quarter ended November 30, 2015   6.67   10.14 
  High  Low 
FY18:        
Quarter ended November 30, 2017 $17.45  $14.25 
Quarter ended February 28, 2018 $17.05  $15.16 
Quarter ended May 31, 2018 $19.95  $14.25 
Quarter ended August 31, 2018 $23.95  $16.70 
FY19:        
Quarter ended November 30, 2018 $21.25  $18.04 
Quarter ended February 28, 2019 $21.66  $17.18 
Quarter ended May 31, 2019 $27.33  $19.74 
Quarter ended August 31, 2019 $41.95  $24.08 

 

Holders

As of November 14, 2016,13, 2019, there were 4238 shareholders of record.

  

Dividends

We paid a total of approximately $3.4$4.2 million in cash dividends during each of fiscal years 20162019, and 2015$4.2 million in fiscal year 2018 as set forth in the table below. We expect to pay quarterly dividends of $0.05$0.06 per share of common stock each quarter, subject to declaration by our Board of Directors. However, there can be no assurances that our Board of Directors will continue the dividend distributions for any specified number of quarters.

 

Fiscal Year  Record Date Distribution
Date
 # of Shares
Outstanding on
Record Date
  Dividend per
Share
  Total
Amount
 
 2015  11/7/2014 11/14/2014  16,841,114  $0.05  $842,056 
    1/26/2015 2/2/2015  16,852,117  $0.05  $842,606 
    5/11/2015 5/18/2015  16,875,117  $0.05  $843,754 
    7/23/15 7/30/2015  16,943,001  $0.05  $847,150 
 2016  11/09/2015 11/16/2015  16,996,001  $0.05  $849,800 
    1/29/2016 02/05/2016  17,018,001  $0.05  $850,900 
    5/02/2016 5/09/2016  17,029,501  $0.05  $851,475 
    8/11/2016 8/18/2016  17,221,978  $0.05  $861,099 
Fiscal Year Record Date Distribution
Date
 # of Shares
Outstanding on
Record Date
  Dividend per
Share
  Total
Amount
 
2018 11/13/2017 11/20/2017  17,284,792  $0.06  $1,037,088 
  1/26/2018 2/2/2018  17,317,752  $0.06  $1,039,065 
  4/25/2018 5/02/2018  17,354,005  $0.06  $1,041,240 
  7/26/2018 8/2/2018  17,405,775  $0.06  $1,044,347 
2019 11/01/2018 11/08/2018  17,417,875  $0.06  $1,045,073 
  1/25/2019 2/1/2019  17,481,450  $0.06  $1,048,887 
  4/24/2019 5/01/2019  17,515,228  $0.06  $1,050,914 
  7/25/2019 8/1/2019  17,536,454  $0.06  $1,052,187 

Shareholder Return Performance Presentation

The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock of a $100 investment from August 31, 2014 through August 31, 2019 assuming reinvestment of dividends, with a similar investment in the Russell 3000 index (the “Russell 3000”) and with the companies listed in the Nasdaq Composite - Total Returns (“IXIC”), and the S&P600 Health Care Equipment & Services Industry Group Index (SP600-3510). The historical information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of future performance. This performance graph shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

 

 

 

 1125 

 

 

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

The following information is provided as of August 31, 2016:2019:

 

Plan category Number of securities
to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)
 Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in column (a))
(c)
  Number of
securities
to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
  Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)
  Number of
securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in column (a))
(c)
 
           
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  947,500  $7.50   438,760   1,163,259  $12.63   666,069 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
Total  947,500  $7.50   438,760   1,163,259  $12.63   666,069 

26

  

Repurchases

There is currently no share repurchase program pending, and the Company has made no repurchases of its securities since fiscal year 2011.

 

ITEM 6 – SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

Not applicable becauseThe following tables set forth the selected consolidated financial data for each of the fiscal years in the five-year period ended August 31, 2019. We derived the selected consolidated financial data from our audited consolidated financial statements, which should be read in conjunction with Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this report.

  Year ended August 31, 
Statements of operations data 2019  2018[c]  2017[a]  2016  2015[b] 
Net Revenues $33,970,440  $29,666,524  $24,137,913  $19,972,079  $18,314,248 
Cost of revenues  9,025,704   7,994,228   6,307,800   4,601,513   4,392,477 
Gross margin  24,944,736   21,672,296   17,830,113   15,370,566   13,921,771 
                     
SG&A expenses  11,796,027   9,583,852   8,198,184   6,693,691   6,736,767 
R&D  2,499,980   1,790,656   1,367,645   1,445,069   1,328,476 
Total operating expenses  14,296,007   11,374,508   9,565,829   8,138,760   8,065,243 
                     
Income from operations  10,648,729   10,297,788   8,264,284   7,231,806   5,856,528 
                     
Other income (expense)  (92,253)  (158,846)  (24,017)  4,586   (163,599)
                     
Income from operations before income taxes  10,556,476   10,138,942   8,240,267   7,236,392   5,692,929 
Provision for income taxes  (1,973,147)  (1,204,130)  (2,452,670)  (2,286,256)  (1,849,968)
Net Income $8,583,329  $8,934,812  $5,787,597  $4,950,136  $3,842,961 
                     
Earnings per share                    
Basic $0.49  $0.52  $0.34  $0.29  $0.23 
Diluted $0.48  $0.50  $0.33  $0.29  $0.23 
                     
Weighted-average common shares outstanding                    
Basic  17,492,258   17,328,707   17,239,490   17,028,566   16,864,670 
Diluted  18,057,431   17,860,392   17,515,917   17,209,506   17,032,158 
                     
Dividend per common share $0.24  $0.24  $0.20  $0.20  $0.20 
Dividends $4,197,055  $4,161,740  $3,448,489  $3,413,274  $3,375,566 

  As of August 31, 
Balance sheet data at year end 2019  2018  2017  2016  2015 
                
Cash and cash equivalents  11,435,499   9,400,701   6,215,718   8,030,284   8,551,275 
Net working capital  16,381,665   12,996,901   10,625,437   10,574,712   7,708,494 
Total assets  45,196,697   43,279,016   38,512,468   27,814,317   27,133,254 
Total liabilities associated with business and intangible acquisitions  1,761,028   5,890,940   5,985,516   1,000,000   3,604,404 
Total liabilities  7,515,093   11,356,391   12,707,581   5,081,723   7,601,052 
Total shareholders’ equity  37,681,604   31,922,625   25,804,887   22,732,594   19,532,202 

27

Notes to Five-Year Summary

[a] Effective June 1, 2017, we areacquired DILIsym Services, Inc. and incurred approximately $620,000 of acquisition related costs in FY2017.

[b] Effective September 2, 2014 we acquired Cognigen Corporation and incurred approximately $410,000 in FY 2015.

[c] In FY2018 we posted a smaller reporting company.$1.5 million deferred tax benefit due to the effect of new tax rates enacted under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

 

ITEM 7 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and related notes included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Management Overview

 

Fiscal year 20162019 highlights:

·We released newADMET Predictor versions of our ADMET Predictor™, DDDPlus™, and KIWI™ software programs.9.5
·We released our new software product, PKPlus™.GastroPlus version 9.7
·We closed a five-year consulting agreement with a major research foundation to implement a platform for global teams engaged in model-based drug developmentreleased DDDPlus® version 6.0 and began work on the projectWe successfully completed the first year of our three-year funded collaboration with the Office of Generic Drugs of the FDA to develop mechanistic models for delivery of long-acting injectable microsphere dosage forms.PKPlus® version 2.5
·We successfully completed the second year of our three-year funded collaboration with the Office of Generic Drugs of the FDA to develop mechanistic models for ocular delivery of drug products.released DILIsym® version 8A
·We successfully completed the fifth year of our five-year renewable collaboration with the Center for Food Safety and Nutrition of the FDA to develop predictive toxicity models for food additives and contaminants.We successfully completed the third year of our five-year collaboration with the Office of Testing and Research of the FDA to validate the mechanistic absorption model andin vitro-in vivocorrelations in GastroPlus™.released NAFLD® version 2A
·We hosted nine workshops in the United States, Europe, Japan, China, Korea,began development of IPFsym® for pulmonary fibrosis and India to educate users on the various features and applicationsRADAsym® for radiation
Phase 2 of our software.RENAsym grant approved for $1.5 million
·Our employees attended 43 scientific conferences, presenting 41 posters and oral podium lectures.
·We achieved an 88% renewal rate for software license accounts (>94% in terms of revenue).
·We signed 75a new clients (includes new organizations and departments at existing clients).research collaboration agreement with the FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine, to apply GastroPlus® to assess virtual bioequivalence in canines
·We finalized new orders for software licenses at several major regulatory agencies (including the FDA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,released Version 4 of its KIWI™ Pharmacometric Communication and China’s CFDACollaboration Platform
·We realized growth in license revenue from contract research organizations (CROs) in excessContinued quarterly payment of 50%, while recognizing greater than 95% growth in license revenue from non-pharmaceutical industry companies (e.g., chemicals, consumer goods).dividend of 6 cents per share
·We saw an approximately 25% increase in membership numbers for the GastroPlus User Group.
·Our Board of Directors declared dividends totaling $0.20 per share ($0.05 per share each quarter of fiscal year 2016).

12

 

Fiscal Year 20162019 Financial Summary:

·Consolidated net revenues increased by $1.658$4.30 million, or 9.1%14.5%, to $19.972$34 million in fiscal year 20162019 from $18.314$29.7 million in fiscal year 2015.2018.
·Consolidated gross margin increased $1.449$3.27 million or 10.4%15.1%, to $15.371$24.9 million in fiscal year 20162019 from $13.922$21.7 million in fiscal year 2015.2018.
·Net income from operations increased $1.385 million,$351,000, or 23.5%3.4%, to $7.232$10.6 million in fiscal year 20162019 from $5.857$10.3 million in fiscal year 2015.2018.
·Net income increaseddecreased by $1.107 million,$351,000, or 28.8%4%, to $4.950$8.58 million in fiscal year 20162019 from $3.843$8.93 million in fiscal year 2015.2018. In 2018 the company had posted a $1.5 million tax benefit due to the effect of new tax rates enacted under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.
·Diluted earnings share decreased by $0.02 or 4% to $0.48 in 2019 from $0.50 in 2018.

 

Strategy Going Forward:

·The Company will continueContinue to advance our software offerings through both our in-house developments and ourpursue funded and unfunded collaborations within support of improving our industryproducts and government customers;services
·Continue to seek acquisitionaccretive acquisitions that complement our existing offerings and partnership possibilities to broadenexpand our offerings of products and services;markets
·Continue our aggressive marketing and sales campaign, including attending and exhibiting at numerous scientific conferences and meetings expanded
·Continue to expand our use of social media and expanded advertising;advertising
·Increase our marketing and sales efforts with respect to our consulting services in both pharmacokinetics and in small molecule design;
·Continue to exploreexpand our sales staff, both in-house and in the application of our technologies to new markets in aerospace and healthcare; andfield
·Continue to seek strategic acquisitions that can addrecruit scientific and other resources to both revenuessupport our product and earnings.scientific consulting services
·Expand our publishing activities in scientific journals

 

Fiscal year 20162019 was yet another record year. We believe the continued growth of our pharmaceutical software and services business segment is the result of steadily increasing adoption of simulation and modeling software tools across the pharmaceutical industry, as well asthe push by regulatory agencies for increased use of modeling and simulation, and the expertise we offer as consultants to assist companies involved in the research and development of new medicines. We have received a continuing series of study contracts with pharmaceutical companies ranging from several of the largest in the world to a number of medium-sized and smaller companies in the U.S., Europe, and Japan.

 

28

Our financial performance has enabled us to maintain significant cash deposits, continue our research and to continue todevelopment activities, and invest in our marketing and sales activities in orderstaffing to reachmeet the needs of a wider customer base, as well as to distribute significant cash dividends to our shareholders.

We completed a second successful year of the integration of Cognigen, following our acquisition of Cognigen in September 2014; it is our intent to continue to search for acquisition opportunities that are strategically compatible with our current businesses and that are accretive, i.e., adding to both revenues and earnings.

 

We do not have any stock repurchase programs currently in place or pending; however, our Board of Directors may consider additionalsuch programs from time to time.

 

Results of Operations

FY19 COMPARED WITH FY18

The following sets forth selected items from our statements of operations (in thousands) and the percentages that such items bear to net sales for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2016 (FY16)2019 (FY19) and August 31, 2015 (FY15)(because2018 (FY18) (Because of rounding, numbers may not foot).foot.)

 

  Fiscal years ended 
   08/31/16   08/31/15 * 
Net sales $19,972   100%  $18,314   100% 
Cost of sales  4,602   23.0   *4,392  24.0 
Gross profit  15,370   77.0   13,922   76.0 
Selling, general and administrative  6,694   33.5   *6,736   36.8 
Research and development  1,445   7.3   1,329   7.2 
Total operating expenses  8,139   40.8   8,065   44.0 
Income from operations  7,232   36.2   5,857   32.0 
Other income  4   (0.0)  (164)  (0.9)
Net income before taxes  7,236   36.2   5,693   31.1 
(Provision) for income taxes  (2,286)  (11.4)  (1,850)  (10.1)
Net income $4,950   24.8%  $3,843   21.0% 

* Numbers in the prior year have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation

13

FY16 COMPARED WITH FY15

  Fiscal year ended 
   8/31/19       8/31/18     
Net revenues $33,970   100.00%  $29,667   100.00% 
Cost of revenues  9,025   26.6   7,994   26.9 
Gross margin  24,945   73.4   21,672   73.1 
Selling, general and administrative  11,796   34.6   9,584   32.3 
Research and development  2,500   7.4   1,791   6.0 
Total operating expenses  14,296   41.9   11,375   38.3 
Income from operations  10,649   31.5   10,298   34.7 
Other income (expense)  (92)  (0.3)  (159)  (0.5)
Net income before taxes  10,556   31.2   10,139   34.2 
(Provision) for income taxes  (1,973)  (5.8)  (1,204)  (4.1)
Net income $8,583   25.4%   $8, 935   30.1% 

 

Net Revenues

Consolidated net revenues increased by 9.1%14.5% or $1.658$4.3 million to $19.972$33.97 million in FY16FY19 from $18.31429.67 million in FY15. $326,000FY18. Our Lancaster, California division increased revenues by $2.03 million or 11.6%, to $19.6 million in FY19 from $17.6 million in FY18. $1.46 million of this increase was from revenues generated by our Buffalo subsidiary (Cognigen), while netan increase of 18.6%. DILIsym Services, Inc. (DILIsym) increased revenues of the California divisionby $807,000 or 19%. FY19 software and software related revenues increased $1.332$1.8 million or 10.2%, to $14.418 million in FY16 from $13.086 million in FY15. FY16 software license sales increased $1.340 million,11.0% while consulting revenues increased by $318,000$2.5 million or 19.0% compared to FY15.FY18.

 

Cost of Revenues

Consolidated cost of revenues increased by $209,000$1.03 million or 12.9% to $4.602$9.0 million in FY16FY19 from $4.392$8.0 million in FY15. The majorityFY18. Labor-related cost incurred by our Lancaster and Buffalo divisions increased by $190,000 and $1.25 million, respectively mainly in support of this increaseincreased consulting revenues. This was salary-related expenses from annual salary increases and the first year of expensed bonuses for our Buffalo division (Cognigen).

Costoffset by a $380,000 decrease in cost of revenues asfor direct contract expenses paid for testing at DILIsym. We saw a percentagedecrease of revenue decreased from 24.0%approximately $52,000 in FY15 to 23.0%training related expenses in FY16. The majority of this percentage change is a result of the percentage blend of software sales compared to consulting services during FY16.FY2019.

  

A significant portion of cost of revenues for pharmaceutical software products is the systematic amortization of capitalized software development costs, which is an independent fixed cost rather than a variable cost related to revenues. This amortization cost decreasedof $1.33 million in FY19 increased by approximately $42,000$31,000 in FY16FY19.

Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenue remained fairly consistent at 26.6% in FY19 as compared with FY15. In FY15, amortization expense increased approximately $215,000 due to releases26.9% in FY18, a decrease of GastroPlus and ADMET Predictor and amortization of software acquired as part of the Cognigen acquisition.0.3% year over year.

 

Gross Margin

Consolidated gross margin increased $1.449$3.27 million or 10.4%15.1%, to $15.371$24.94 million in FY16FY19 from $13.922$21.67 million in FY15. $1.372FY18. $1.8 million of this increase is from the California division, which showed an 84.3%83.3% gross margin. The Buffalo Division Grossgross margins increased $77,000$325,000 or 7% with margins of 58% after first-time bonuses53.2%. DILIsym of $139,000.North Carolina recorded a $1.14 million increase, a 72.7% margin, versus a 59.6% margin in FY18.

 

29

Overall gross margin has remained fairly consistent at 73.4% in FY19 as compared to 73.1% in FY18 an increase of 0.3% year over year.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses decreased $43,000,increased $2.22 million, or 0.6%23.1% to $6.694$11.80 million in FY16FY19 from $6.737$9.58 million in FY15.FY18. As a percent of revenues, SG&A was 34.6% for FY19, compared to 32.3% in FY18 and 33.9% in FY17.

 

The major increases in SG&A expense were:

 

oAdvertisingCommission expenses increased by $97,000 as the Company increased its web presence and incurred other advertising-related costs;
oMarketing labor expenses increased by $46,000,were up $122,000, mainly related to more time spent by scientific staff;increased sales through representatives in Asia
oTrade show expenses increased by $49,000, related to greater attendanceAccounting and presence during FY16;
oProfessionalaudit fees increased by $120,000$73,000 associated with costs of consolidated audits and other compliance-related expenses;expenses
Contract labor increased $172,000 due to increased director fees and consulting related to various corporate initiatives
oOutside software licensing feesG&A salaries and wages increased by $59,000.$939,000; this increase is a combination of increased headcount and salaries in support of corporate growth
Insurance expense increased $218,000; $174,000 was health-related medical costs from increased headcount and rate increases
Payroll tax expense increased $116,000, the effect of higher salary expense
401k expense increased $78,000 due to the increased staffing
Recruiting and hiring costs increased $214,000 mainly due to recruiting fees of scientific personnel  
Software licenses costs increased $87,000 mainly due to sales volume related license fee increases

 

The major decreases in SG&A expense were:

 

oOutside consulting fees decreased by $397,000; in FY15, we paid fees and expenses to our financial advisor/business broker related to the Cognigen acquisition. There were no such expenses in FY16.
Trade show related costs decreased by $52,000 mainly due to lower attendance costs

 

Research and Development

We incurred approximately $2,641,000$4,299,000 of research and development costs during FY16.FY19. Of this amount, $1,196,000$1,768,000 was capitalized and $1,445,000$2,500,000 was expensed. We incurred approximately $2,496,000$3,936,000 of research and development costs during FY15.FY18. Of this amount, $1,168,000$2,145,000 was capitalized and $1,328,000$1,791,000 was expensed. The increase of $ 145,000,$363,000, or 5.8%9.2%, in total research and development expenditures from FY15FY18 to FY16FY19 was mainly from $278,000 of costs incurred by DILIsym Services Inc.

Provision for Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes was $1.97 million for FY19 compared to $1.20 million for FY18. Our effective tax rate increased to 18.7% in FY19 from 11.9% in FY18.

This increase results mainly from a second quarter 2018 assessment of deferred taxes based on the new tax rates enacted under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “2017 Tax Act”). Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”) requires that the company recognize the effects of changes in tax laws or tax rates in the financial statements for the period in which such changes were enacted. Among other things, changes in tax laws or tax rates can affect the amount of taxes payable for the current period, as well as the amount and timing of deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets. Based on the assessment the Company posted a one-time tax benefit in the amount of $1,500,000 in the second fiscal quarter of 2018, the result of estimating future deferred liabilities at the lower tax rates under the newly enacted tax laws.

The effective rate differs from statutory rates of approximately 25.4% due to salary increasesR&D credits and the tax effect of disqualifying dispositions. In the last part of FY19, as a result of increase in stock prices, a number of employees exercised and sold incentive stock options granted to them under their corporate incentive plans, creating corporate tax deductions that lowered the effective rate.

Net Income

Net income decreased by $351,000 or 3.9%, to $8.6 million in FY19 from $8.93 million in FY18. The decrease in income was substantially effected by the deferred tax benefit of $1.5 million discussed above in the note on Provision for existing staff.Income Taxes, which reduced taxes in FY18.

 

 

 

 1430

FY18 COMPARED WITH FY17

The following sets forth selected items from our statements of operations (in thousands) and the percentages that such items bear to net sales for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2018 (FY18) and August 31, 2017 (FY17) (Because of rounding, numbers may not foot.)

  Fiscal years ended 
  8/31/18  8/31/17 
Net revenues $29,667   100.00%  $24,138   100.0% 
Cost of revenues  7,994   26.9   6,308   26.1 
Gross margin  21,672   73.1   17,830   73.9 
Selling, general and administrative  9,584   32.3   8,198   34.0 
Research and development  1,791   6.0  ��1,368   5.6 
Total operating expenses  11,375   38.3   9,566   39.6 
Income from operations  10,298   34.7   8,264   34.2 
Other income  (159)  (0.5)  (24)  (0.1)
Net income before taxes  10,139   34.2   8,240   34.1 
(Provision) for income taxes  (1,204)  (4.1)  (2,253)  (10.1)
Net income $8,935   30.1%  $5,788   24.0% 

Net Revenues

Consolidated net revenues increased by 22.9% or $5.53 million to $29.67 million in FY18 from $24.14 million in FY17. Our Lancaster, California division increased $1.95 million or 12.5%, to $17.6 million in FY18 from $15.6 million in FY17. $557,000 of this increase was from revenues generated by our Buffalo subsidiary (Cognigen), an increase of 7.6%. DILIsym Services, Inc. (DILIsym), recorded revenues of $4.3 million; in FY17 revenues were $1.2 million for the period of June 1, 2017 thru the end of fiscal year August 31, 2017. FY18 software license sales increased $1.03 million while consulting revenues increased by $4.49 million compared to FY17; $3.2 million of the consulting increase was revenues of DILIsym Services Inc.

Cost of Revenues

Consolidated cost of revenues increased by $1.69 million or 26.7% to $8.0 million in FY18 from $6.31 million in FY17. Labor-related cost accounted for $922,000 of this increase, a combination of increased labor count, salary increases, and bonuses at our subsidiaries based on increased earnings. Included in the increase was $505,000 of salary expense at DILIsym. Other significant increases in cost of revenues included $393,000 of increase direct contract expenses paid for testing at DILIsym. We saw a decrease of approximately $65,000 in training related expenses in FY2018.

A significant portion of cost of revenues for pharmaceutical software products is the systematic amortization of capitalized software development costs, which is an independent fixed cost rather than a variable cost related to revenues. This amortization cost increased approximately $203,000 in FY18 compared with FY17. In addition, in 2018 there was an additional $238,000 of amortization expense associated with acquired technologies associated with DILIsym’s drug-induced liver injury technologies.

Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenue increased to 26.9% in FY18 from 26.1% in FY17. The majority of this percentage change is a result of the increased salary costs associated with consulting costs and the blend of software sales compared to consulting services during FY18.

Gross Margin

Consolidated gross margin increased $3.84 million or 21.5%, to $21.67 million in FY18 from $17.83 million in FY17. $1.5 million of this increase is from the California division, which showed an 82.6% gross margin. The Buffalo Division gross margins increased $437,000 or 10.4% with margins of 58.9%. DILIsym of North Carolina showed $2.54 million, a 59.6% margin vs a 55.2% margin in FY17 which represented only one quarters worth of activities.

Overall gross margin decreased to 73.1% in FY18 from 73.9% in FY17 due to increased salary costs associated with the relatively higher revenue mix of consulting to software in FY17.

31 

 

 

Other income (expense)Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Net other income (expense)Selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased $1.39 million, or 16.9% to $9.58 million in FY16 increased by $168,000FY18 from $8.19 million in FY17. As a percent of revenues, SG&A was 32.31% for FY18, compared to a net other income of $5,000 from an expense of $164,00033.96% in FY15. This is due mainly to a $168,000 reduction in currency lossesFY17 and 33.52% in FY16.

 

The major increases in SG&A expense were:

Commission expenses were up $175,000, mainly related to increased sales through representatives in Asia
Accounting and audit fees increased by $40,000 associated with costs of consolidated audits and other compliance-related expenses
Contract labor increased $187,000 mainly due to increase director fees
G&A Salaries and Wages increased by $621,000; this increase is a combination of increased salaries of $255,000 at DILIsym, annual salary increases and increased in head count.
Insurance Expense increased $247,000; $234,000 was health-related medical costs of which $98,000 was associated with DILIsym.
Payroll tax expense increased $204,000, the effect of higher salary expense of which $98,000 was DILIsym
401k expense increased $75,000 due to the increased staffing and full year of employees at DILIsym
Trade shows, and travel expense increased $125,000
Rent increase $57,000 due mainly to the addition of DILIsym in June 2017
Amortization expense increased $158,000 due to increase acquisition amortization for DILIsym intangibles

The major decreases in SG&A expense were:

G&A expenses categories for consulting, legal, and accounting decrease by a total of $620,000 in FY18 as in FY17 there were one-time charges associated with the acquisition of DILIsym Services.

Research and Development

We incurred approximately $3,936,000 of research and development costs during FY18. Of this amount, $2,145,000 was capitalized and $1,791,000 was expensed. We incurred approximately $2,743,000 of research and development costs during FY17. Of this amount, $1,376,000 was capitalized and $1,367,000 was expensed. The increase of $1,193,000, or 43.5%, in total research and development expenditures from FY17 to FY18 was mainly from $504,000 of costs incurred by DILIsym Services Inc.

Provision for Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes was $2.286$1.20 million for FY16FY18 compared to $1.850$2.45 million for FY15.FY17. Our effective tax rate decreased to 31.6%11.9% in FY16FY18 from 32.5%29.8% in FY15.FY17. This decrease results mainly from a second quarter 2018 assessment of deferred taxes based on the new tax rates enacted under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “2017 Tax Act). Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”) requires that the company recognize the effects of changes in tax laws or tax rates in the financial statements for the period in which such changes were enacted. Among other things, changes in tax laws or tax rates can affect the amount of taxes payable for the current period, as well as the amount and timing of deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets. Based on the assessment the Company posted a one-time tax benefit in the amount of $1,500,000 in the second fiscal quarter of 2018, the result of estimating future deferred liabilities at the lower tax rates under the newly enacted tax laws.

 

Net Income

Net income increased by $1,107,000,$3.15 million or 28.8%54.4%, to $4.950$8.93 million in FY15FY18 from $3.843$5.79 million in FY15.FY17. Of note, this increase includes a one-time deferred tax benefit of $1.5 million as discuss above in the note on Provision for Income Taxes, and a full year’s net income for DILIsym Services, Inc.

 

SEASONALITY

Our sales exhibit some seasonal fluctuations, with the fourth fiscal quarter (June-August) generally having the lowest sales over the past three fiscal years because ofdue to summer vacations and reduced activities at our customers’ sites. In 2017, revenues in the fourth quarter revenues were higher increased due to the acquisition of DILIsym along with increased revenues at our Buffalo Division. Our subsidiaries DILIsym and Cognigen Corporations revenue mix is a higher blend of consulting revenues, as such the seasonality of total revenues has tended to flatten in the last couple years. This unaudited quarterly sales information has been prepared on the same basis as the annual information presented elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and, in the opinion of management, reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring entries) necessary for a fair presentation of the information presented. Net sales for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of sales for any future period; however, because our pharmaceutical software is licensed on an annual basis, renewals are usually within the same quarter year after year. (Numbers may not foot because of rounding.)

 

   Net Sales (in thousands of dollars) 
FY  First Quarter  Second Quarter  Third Quarter  Fourth Quarter  Total 
 2016   4,839   5,164   6,011   3,958   19,972 
 2015   4,086   4,574   5,942   3,712   18,314 
 2014   2,641   3,081   3,741   1,998   11,461 
 2013   2,290   3,118   3,095   1,568   10,071 
 2012   2,248   2,789   2,772   1,640   9,449 
 2011   2,050   2,622   2,640   1,427   8,739 
 2010   1,735   2,227   2,325   1,334   7,621 

 

32

Net Sales (in thousands of dollars)
FY First Quarter  Second Quarter  Third Quarter  Fourth Quarter  Total 
2019 $7,536   8,472   9,937   8,026  $33,971 
2018 $7,069   7,357   8,553   6,688  $29,667 
2017 $5,418   5,706   6,748   6,265  $24,138 
2016 $4,839   5,164   6,011   3,958  $19,972 
2015 $4,086   4,574   5,942   3,712  $18,314 
2014 $2,641   3,081   3,741   1,998  $11,461 
2013 $2,290   3,118   3,095   1,568  $10,071 
2012 $2,248   2,789   2,772   1,640  $9,449 
2011 $2,050   2,622   2,640   1,427  $8,739 
2010 $1,735   2,227   2,325   1,334  $7,621 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our principal source of capital has been cash flow from our operations. We have achieved continuous positive operating cash flow over the last twelve fiscal years. We believe that our existing capital and anticipated funds from operations will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for the foreseeable future. Thereafter, if cash generated from operations is insufficient to satisfy our capital requirements, we may open a revolving line of credit with a bank, or we may have to sell additional equity or debt securities or obtain credit facilities. In the event such financing is needed in the future, there can be no assurance that such financing will be available to us, or, if available, that it will be in amounts and on terms acceptable to us. If cash flows from operations became insufficient to continue operations at the current level, and if no additional financing was obtained, then management would restructure the Company in a way to preserve its pharmaceutical business while maintaining expenses within operating cash flows.

 

We are not aware of any trends or demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that are reasonably likely to result in a decrease in liquidity of our assets. The trend over the last ten years has been increasing cash deposits from our operating cash flows, and we expect that trend to continue for the foreseeable future. In FY14 we used $2,500,000 of our cash reserves to pay the initial installment of the amounts we owe under termination and non-assertion agreement we entered into with TSRL in May 2014 that terminated the exclusive software licensing agreement we entered with TSRL in 1997. We also incurred $2,500,000 of debt in connection with termination and non-assertion agreement. We have been paying that debt out of, and anticipate that that debt will continue to be, paid out of operations from the reduction in royalty payments that are no longer payable under the 1997 licensing agreement as a result of its termination.

15

 

On July 23, 2014,May 1, 2017 we signed a stock acquisition agreement with DILIsym Services, Inc. of Research Triangle Circle, North Carolina, and on June 1, 2017 consummated the Mergeracquisition of all the outstanding capital stock of DILIsym Services, Inc. pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement. DILIsym became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Simulations Plus. Under the terms of the Agreement, with Cognigen. The merger closed on September 2, 2014, subsequentthe Company: (1) paid to the end of FY14, and Cognigen became our wholly-owned subsidiary. In connection withDILIsym Shareholders Five Million Dollars, $4,515,982 payable at the closing we paid $2,080,000 in cash and issued 491,159 shares of common stock of the CompanyAcquisition subject to certain adjustments and holdbacks and will pay to the former Cognigen stockholders. The 491,159 shares were valued at $3,120,000 based on a $6.35 per share price, which wasDILIsym Shareholders certain earn-out payments, to be measured by the volume-weighted average closing priceearnings of our common stock forDILIsym before income taxes, payable following the 30 consecutive trading-day period ending two trading days beforeClosing, as more particularly described in the closing date. In July 2016, we paid the additional $720,000Agreement and as more fully described in cash due, and issued the additional 170,014 shares of common stock due, to the former Cognigen stockholders, which additional shares were valued at $1,080,000 under the formula described above.Note 13.

 

We will continue to seek opportunities for strategic acquisitions. If one or more such acquisitions is identified, a substantial portion of our cash reserves may be required to complete it; however, we intend to maintain sufficient cash reserves after any acquisition to provide reasonable assurance that outside financing will not be necessary to continue operations. If we identify an attractive acquisition that would require more cash to complete than we are willing or able to use from our cash reserves, we will consider financing options to complete the acquisition, including obtaining loans and issuing additional securities.

 

33

Quarterly dividend payments made in FY15FY18 and FY16FY19 are listed in the following table.

 

Fiscal Year  Record Date Distribution Date # of Shares Outstanding on Record Date  Dividend per
Share
  Total Amount 
 2015  11/7/2014 11/14/2014  16,841,114  $0.05  $842,056 
    1/26/2015 2/2/2015  16,852,117  $0.05  $842,606 
    5/11/2015 5/18/2015  16,875,117  $0.05  $843,754 
    7/23/15 7/30/2015  16,943,001  $0.05  $847,150 
 2016  11/09/2015 11/16/2015  16,996,001  $0.05  $849,800 
    1/29/2016 02/05/2016  17,018,001  $0.05  $850,900 
    5/02/2016 5/09/2016  17,029,501  $0.05  $851,475 
    8/11/2016 8/18/2016  17,221,978  $0.05  $861,099 
Fiscal Year  Record Date Distribution
Date
 # of Shares
Outstanding on
Record Date
  Dividend per
Share
  Total
Amount
 2018  11/13/2017 11/20/2017  17,284,792  $0.06  $1,037,088
    1/26/2018 2/2/2018  17,317,752  $0.06  $1,039,065
    4/25/2018 5/02/2018  17,354,005  $0.06  $1,041,240
    7/26/2018 8/2/2018  17,405,775  $0.06  $1,044,347
 2019  11/01/2018 11/08/2018  17,417,875  $0.06  $1,045,073
    1/25/2019 2/1/2019  17,481,450  $0.06  $1,048,887
    4/24/2019 5/01/2019  17,515,228  $0.06  $1,050,914
    7/25/2019 8/1/2019  17,536,454  $0.06  $1,052,187

 

The Board of directors has indicated its intensionintention to pay $0.05$0.06 quarterly dividends; however, there can be no assurances that our Board of Directors will continue the dividend distributions as the decision is made on a quarterly basis based on current financial conditions and strategic plans. After the end of FY16, inIn November 2016,2019, our Board of Directors declared and paid a dividend distribution of $0.05$0.06 per share.

 

KNOWN TRENDS OR UNCERTAINTIES

Although we have not seen any significant reduction in revenues to date, we have seen some consolidation in the pharmaceutical industry during economic downturns. These consolidations have not had a negative effect on our total sales to that industry; however, should consolidations and downsizing in the industry continue to occur, those events could adversely impact our revenues and earnings going forward.

  

We believe that the need for improved productivity in the research and development activities directed toward developing new medicines will continue to result in increasing adoption of simulation and modeling tools such as those we produce. New product developments in the pharmaceutical business segments could result in increased revenues and earnings if they are accepted by our markets; however, there can be no assurances that new products will result in significant improvements to revenues or earnings. For competitive reasons, we do not disclose all of our new product development activities.

 

Our continued quest for acquisitions could result in a significant change to revenues and earnings if one or more such acquisitions are completed.

The potential for growth in new markets (e.g., aerospace and healthcare) is uncertain. We will continue to explore these opportunities until such time as we either generate sales or determine that resources would be more efficiently used elsewhere.

16

 

INFLATION

We have not been affected materially by inflation during the periods presented, and no material effect is expected in the near future.

 

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

As of August 31, 2016,2019, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market, or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.

 

We do not have relationships or transactions with persons or entities that derive benefits from their non-independent relationship with us or our related parties.

 

34

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following table provides aggregate information regarding our contractual obligations as of August 31, 2019 (in thousands).

  Payments due by period 
Contractual obligations: Total  Less than
1 year
  1–3
years
  3–5
years
  More than
5 years
 
    
Operating lease obligations $942  $565  $376  $  $ 
Contracts Payable  1,761   1,761          
                     
Total $2,703  $2,326  $376  $  $ 

RECENTLY ISSUED OR NEWLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In May 2014, the FranchiseFinancial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers(ASU 2014-09). The standard will eliminate the transaction- and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (GAAP) and replace it with a principles-based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for years beginning after December 15, 2016. The revenue recognition standard is required to be applied retrospectively, including any combination of practical expedients as allowed in the standard. We are evaluating the impact, if any, ofThe standard was adopted concurrently with the adoption of ASU 2014-09 to our financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoing financial reporting.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No 2015-17,Income Taxes (Topic 740)(“ASU 2015-17). The amendments in ASU 2015-17 change the requirements for the classification of deferred taxes on the balance sheet. Currently, GAAP requires an entity to separate deferred income tax liabilities and assets into current and noncurrent amounts in a classified statement of financial position. To simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes, the amendments in this ASU require that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The pronouncement2016-10 which is effective for fiscal yearsannual and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Earlier application is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoing financial reporting.2017.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which supersedes existing guidance on accounting for leases in "Leases (Topic 840)" and generally requires all leases to be recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018; early adoption is permitted. The provisions of ASU 2016-02 are to be applied using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

  

In MarchApril 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09,Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (ASU 2016-09). This ASU affects entities that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. The ASU is designed to simplify several aspects of accounting for share-based payment award transactions which include - the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, classification on the statement of cash flows and forfeiture rate calculations. ASU 2016-09 will become effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2016, the FASB issued AS 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which amends certain aspects of the Board's new revenue standard, ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The standard should bewas adopted concurrently with the adoption of ASU 2014-09 which is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoing financial reporting.

17

 

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Estimates

Our financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with GAAP. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management’s application of accounting policies. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant accounting policies for us include revenue recognition, accounting for capitalized software development costs, valuation of stock options, and accounting for income taxes.

 

Revenue Recognition

The Company adopted Topic 606 effective September 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method applying this guidance to all open contracts at the date of initial application, which resulted in an adjustment to retained earnings for the cumulative effect of applying this guidance. The most significant impact of Topic 606 on revenue to the Company relates to the timing of revenue recognition for one of its payment contracts. Under 606 the revenues under the contract are being recognized as time is expended and costs are being expensed as incurred. Under ASC 605 revenues were recognized as invoiced and certain costs were capitalized as development.

We recognize revenues related togenerate revenue primarily from the sale of software licenses and software maintenance in accordance withproviding consulting services to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 985-605, “Software – Revenue Recognition”. Software productpharmaceutical industry for drug development.

The Company determines revenue is recorded whenrecognition through the following conditions are met: 1) evidence of arrangement exists; 2) delivery has been made; 3) the amount is fixed; and 4) collectability is probable. Post-contract customer support (“PCS”) obligations are insignificant; therefore, revenue for PCS is recognized at the same time as the licensing fee, and the costs of providing such support services are accrued and amortized over the obligation period.steps:

i.Identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer
ii.Identification of the performance obligations in the contract

 

35

As

iii.Determination of the transaction price
iv.Allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract
v.Recognition of revenue when, or as, the Company satisfies a performance obligation

The Company accounts for a byproduct of ongoing improvementscontract when it has approval and upgrades forcommitment from both parties, the new programs and new modules of software, some modifications are provided to our customers who have already purchased software at no additional charge. Other software modifications result in new, additional cost modules that expand the functionalityrights of the software. Theseparties are licensed separately. We consideridentified, payment terms are identified, the modifications thatcontract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is probable. Contracts generally have fixed pricing terms and are provided without chargenot subject to variable pricing. The Company considers the nature and significance of each specific performance obligation under a contract when allocating the proceeds under each contract. Accounting for contracts includes significant judgement in the estimation of estimated hours/cost to be minimal, as they do not significantly changeincurred on consulting contracts, and the basic functionality or utilitydi minimis nature of the post sales costs associated with software but rather add convenience, such as being able to plot some additional variable on a graph in addition to the numerous variables that had been available before, or adding some additional calculations to supplement the information provided from running the software. Such software modifications for any single product have typically occurred once or twice per year, sometimes more, sometimes less. Thus, they are infrequent. The Company provides, for a fee, additional training and service calls to its customers and recognizes revenue at the time the training or service call is provided.

Generally, we enter into one-year license agreements with customers for the use of our pharmaceutical software products. We recognize revenue on these contracts when all the criteria are met. Most license agreements have a term of one year; however, from time to time, we enter into multi-year license agreements. We generally unlock and invoice software one year at a time for multi-year licenses. Therefore, revenue is recognized one year at a time. Certain of the Company's software products are housed and supported on the Company's computer networks. Software revenues for those products are included in income over the life of the contract.

We recognize revenue from collaboration research and revenue from grants equally over their terms. For contract revenues based on actual hours incurred we recognize revenues when the work is performed. For fixed price contracts, we recognize contract study and other contract revenues using the percentage-of-completion method, depending upon how the contract studies are engaged, in accordance with ASC 605-35, “Revenue Recognition – Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts”. To recognize revenue using the percentage-of-completion method, we must determine whether we meet the following criteria: 1) there is a long-term, legally enforceable contract, 2) it is possible to reasonably estimate the total project costs, and 3) it is possible to reasonably estimate the extent of progress toward completion.sales.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statements of cash flows, we consider all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

 

Accounts Receivable

We analyze the age of customer balances, historical bad-debt experience, customer creditworthiness, and changes in customer payment terms when making estimates of the collectability of the Company’s trade accounts receivable balances. If we determine that the financial conditions of any of itsour customers deteriorated, whether due to customer-specific or general economic issues, an increase in the allowance may be made. Accounts receivable are written off when all collection attempts have failed. We have not experienced any bad debts in our pharmaceutical software and services business.

18

 

Capitalized Computer Software Development Costs

Software development costs are capitalized in accordance with FASB ASC 985-20, “Costs of Software to Be Sold Leased, or Marketed”. Capitalization of software development costs begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility and is discontinued when the product is available for sale.

 

The establishment of technological feasibility and the ongoing assessment for recoverability of capitalized software development costs require considerable judgment by management with respect to certain external factors including, but not limited to, technological feasibility, anticipated future gross revenues, estimated economic life, and changes in software and hardware technologies. Capitalized computer software development costs are comprised primarily of salaries and direct payroll-related costs and the purchase or licensing of existing software to be used in the Company’s software products.

 

Amortization of capitalized computer software development costs is providedcalculated on a product-by-product basis on the straight-line method over the estimated economic life of the products not to exceed five years. Amortization of software development costs amounted to $981,066$1,331,753, $1,300,434 and $1,023,139$1,096,967 for the FY16FY19, FY18 and FY15,FY17, respectively. We expect future amortization expense to vary due to increases in capitalized computer software development costs.

 

We test capitalized computer software development costs for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

 

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives as follows:

 

Equipment 5 years
Computer equipment 3 to 7 years
Furniture and fixtures 5 to 7 years
Leasehold improvements Shorter of life of asset or lease

36

 

Maintenance and minor replacements are charged to expense as incurred. Gains and losses on disposals are included in the results of operations.

 

Intangible Assets and Goodwill

The Company performs valuations of assets acquired and liabilities assumed on each acquisition accounted for as a business combination and recognizes the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their acquisition date fair value. Acquired intangible assets include customer relationships, software, trade name, and non-compete agreements. The Company determines the appropriate useful life by performing an analysis of expected cash flows based on historical experience of the acquired businesses. Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method, which approximates the pattern in which the majority of the economic benefits are expected to be consumed.

 

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the fair value of the acquired net assets. Goodwill is not amortized, instead it is tested for impairment annually or when events or circumstances change that would indicate that goodwill might be impaired. Events or circumstances that could trigger an impairment review include, but are not limited to, a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, unanticipated competition, a loss of key personnel, significant changes in the manner of the Company's use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the Company's overall business, significant negative industry or economic trends or significant under-performance relative to expected historical or projected future results of operations.

  

19

Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is one level below or the same as an operating segment. As of August 31, 2016,2019, the Company determined that it has twothree reporting units, Simulations Plus, Cognigen Corporation and Cognigen.DILIsym Services, Inc. When testing goodwill for impairment, the Company first performs a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is necessary to perform step one of a two-step annual goodwill impairment test for each reporting unit. The Company is required to perform step one only if it concludes that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit's fair value is less than its carrying value. Should this be the case, the first step of the two-step process is to identify whether a potential impairment exists by comparing the estimated fair values of the Company's reporting units with their respective book values, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit exceeds book value, goodwill is considered not to be impaired, and no additional steps are necessary. If, however, the fair value of the reporting unit is less than book value, then the second step is performed to determine if goodwill is impaired and to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The amount of the impairment loss is the excess of the carrying amount of the goodwill over its implied fair value. The estimate of implied fair value of goodwill is primarily based on an estimate of the discounted cash flows expected to result from that reporting unit, but may require valuations of certain internally generated and unrecognized intangible assets such as the Company's software, technology, patents and trademarks. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess.

 

As of August 31, 2016,2019, the entire balance of goodwill was attributed to two of the Company's reporting units Cognigen reporting unit.and DILIsym. Intangible assets subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. TheThere were no changes to goodwill, nor has the Company has not recognized any impairment charges during FY16FY19, FY18 and FY15.FY17.

 

Reconciliation of Goodwill for FY16FY19, FY18 and FY15:FY17:

  

 Balance,  August 31, 2014  $–  
 Addition   4,789,248 
 Impairments    
 Balance,  August 31, 2015  $4,789,248 
 Addition    
 Impairments    
 Balance,  August 31, 2016  $4,789,248 
  Cognigen  DILIsym  Total 
Balance, August 31, 2016  4,789,248      4,789,248 
Addition     5,597,950   5,597,950 
Impairments         
Balance, August 31, 2017  4,789,248   5,597,950   10,387,198 
Addition         
Impairments         
Balance, August 31, 2018  4,789,248   5,597,950   10,387,198 
Addition         
Impairments         
Balance, August 31, 2019 $4,789,248  $5,597,950  $10,387,198 

37

 

Other Intangible Assets

The following table summarizes other intangible assets as of August 31, 2016:2019: 

 

  Amortization
Period
 Acquisition
Value
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Net book
value
 
Customer relationships Straight line 8 years $1,100,000  $275,000  $825,000 
Trade Name-Cognigen None  500,000   0   500,000 
Covenants not to compete Straight line 5 years  50,000   20,000   30,000 
    $1,650,000  $295,000  $1,355,000 
  Amortization
Period
 Acquisition
Value
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Net book
value
 
Customer relationships-Cognigen Straight line 8 years $1,100,000  $687,500  $412,500 
Trade Name-Cognigen None  500,000   0   500,000 
Covenants not to compete-Cognigen Straight line 5 years  50,000   50,000   0 
Covenants not to compete-DILIsym Straight line 4 years  80,000   45,000   35,000 
Trade Name-DILIsym None  860,000   0   860,000 
Customer relationships-DILIsym Straight line 8 years  1,900,000   427,500   1,472,500 
    $4,490,000  $1,210,000  $3,280,000 

 

Amortization expense for each of FY16FY19, FY18, and FY15FY17 was $147,500.$357,500, $357,500, and $200,000, respectively.

20

  

Business Acquisitions

The Company accounted for the acquisition of Cognigen and DILIsym Services Inc. using the purchase method of accounting where the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recognized based on their respective estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Determining the fair value of certain acquired assets and liabilities is subjective in nature and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including, but not limited to, the selection of appropriate valuation methodology, projected revenue, expenses and cash flows, weighted average cost of capital, discount rates, estimates of advertiser and publisher turnover rates and estimates of terminal values. Business acquisitions are included in the Company's consolidated financial statements as of the date of the acquisition.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the Condensed Balance Sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. The categories, as defined by the standard are as follows:

 

Level Input: Input Definition:
Level I Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.
Level II Inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level I, that are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration with market data at the measurement date.
Level III Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.

 

For certain of our financial instruments, including accounts receivable, accounts payable, contract payable, accrued payroll and other expenses, and accrued bonus to officer, the amounts approximate fair value due to their short maturities.

 

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred until technological feasibility has been established. These costs consist primarily ofinclude salaries, laboratory experiment, and direct payroll-related costs. It also includes purchased software and databases that werewas developed by other companies and incorporated into, or used in the development of, our final products.

 

Income Taxes

We utilize FASBThe Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740-10, “Income“Income Taxes”, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns.

 

Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-endyear end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The provision for income taxes represents the tax payable for the period and the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.

 

38

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock options using the modified prospective method in accordance with FASB ASC 718-10,“Compensation-Stock Compensation”. Under this method, compensation costs include estimated grant date fair value of the awards amortized over the options’ vesting period. Stock-based compensation was $347,077$865,848, $562,079 and $295,243$585,018 for the fiscal years ended August 31, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively, and is included in the statements of operations as Consulting, Salaries, and Research and Development expense.

21

 

ITEM 7A – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Not applicableAs of August 31, 2019, and August 31, 2018, we had cash and cash equivalents of $11.44 million and $9.40 million, respectively. We do not hold any investments that are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates, which could adversely affect the value of our assets and liabilities, and we do not hold any instruments for trading purposes and investment. Some of our cash and cash equivalents are held in money market accounts; however, they are not exposed to market rate risk.

In the years ended August 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 we sold $4.15 million, $3.57 million and $2.75 million, respectively, of software through representatives in certain Asian markets in local currencies. As a result, our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows can be affected by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly fluctuations in the yen and RMB exchange rates. These transactions give rise to receivables that are denominated in currencies other than the entity’s functional currency. The value of these receivables is subject to changes because wethe receivables may become worth more or less due to changes in currency exchange rates. The majority of our software license agreements are denominated in U.S. dollars. We record foreign gains and losses as they are realized. We mitigate our risk from foreign currency fluctuations by adjusting prices in our foreign markets on a smaller reporting company.periodic basis. We base these changes on market conditions while working closely with our representatives. We do not hedge currencies or enter into derivative contracts. 

  

ITEM 8 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

See the financial statements included elsewhere in this report beginning at page F-1, which are incorporated herein by reference.

 

ITEM 9 – CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

There have been no changes to our public accountants during the past two years.None.

 

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

We maintain a set of disclosureOur Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating our “disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosedprocedures” (as defined in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act"Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including the Company's Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer (i.e. its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer), as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act)and 15d-15(e) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on such evaluation, the Company's Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer10-K (the “Evaluation Date”), have concluded that as of the end of such period, due to the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting described below,Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, where appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Management'sManagement Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting

 

ManagementOur management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internalreporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Management assessed our internal control over financial reporting is aas of August 31, 2019, the end of our fiscal year. Management based its assessment on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). Management’s assessment included evaluation of elements such as the design and operating effectiveness of key financial reporting controls, process designeddocumentation, accounting policies, and our overall control environment.

39

Based on this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the end of the fiscal year to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generally acceptedU.S. GAAP. We reviewed the results of management’s assessment with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.

Our independent registered public accounting principles. Internalfirm, Rose Snyder and Jacobs LLP, independently assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, includes those policiesas stated in the firm’s attestation report, which is included within Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Internalour internal control over financial reporting cannotwill prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well-designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting can also be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. Also, projectionsstated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls to future periods are subject to the risk thatrisks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or thatdeterioration in the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.procedures.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

22

A material weaknessNo change in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in SEC Rule 12b-2) is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2016. In making this assessment, management used the criteria described in 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of August 31, 2016. Management has identified the following material weakness of internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2016:

Information Technology General Controls

During our review of internal controls, we identified various deficiencies related to the design, implementation, and effectiveness of our general information technology controls (“GITCs”) over financial reporting. In particular, these deficiencies related to the configuration set-up of the information technology system and related financial applications, segregation of duties, user access, and change management controls that are intended to ensure that access to financial applications and data, and the ability to place program changes into production for such financial applications and data, are adequately restricted to appropriate internal personnel. Due to these GITC deficiencies, we concluded that those deficiencies, in the aggregate, result in a reasonable possibility that material misstatements in our interim or annual financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis and, as such, constitute a material weakness as of August 31, 2016. Management believes that although our financial reports have been accurate and that the weaknesses identified in our review have not resulted in any material misstatement in our interim or annual financial statements at any time, that we will improve our GITCs to ensure accurate reporting is not compromised in the future.

Management has taken steps to remediate the GITC deficiencies, including enhancing its internal documentation and monitoring approach to ensure that all GITC procedures designed to restrict access to applications and data are operating in an optimal manner in order to provide management with comfort that access is properly limited to the appropriate internal personnel. Management implemented the majority of the remedial steps during the fourth quarter of 2016 and expects that all steps will be substantially implemented and tested by February 28, 2017. In accordance with our internal control compliance program, a material weakness is not considered remediated until the remediation processes have been operational for a sufficient period of time and successfully tested.

Rose, Snyder & Jacobs LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has also audited our internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2016, as stated in their report which is included herein.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

Except as described above in this Item 9A, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with our evaluation thatExchange Act) occurred during the fourthCompany’s most recent fiscal quarter of the fiscal year ended August 31, 2016, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

ITEM 9B - OTHER INFORMATION

 

Not applicable.None.

 

 

 

 2340 

 

 

PART III

 

ITEM 10 – DIRECTORS, AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Code of Ethics

Our code of ethics is posted on our website: www.simulations-plus.com.

Changes to Procedures for Recommending Nominees to the Board of Directors

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our board of directors since we last described such procedures.

The remaining informationInformation required by Item 10 is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Board Matters and Corporate Governance,” “Election of Directors,” “Executive Compensation and Other Information,” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in our definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A to be distributed in connection with our 2017 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting (the “Proxy Statement”).

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our board of directors since we last described such procedures.

The Company has a Corporate Code of Ethics which is posted on our website: www.simulations-plus.com.

 

ITEM 11 – EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Executive Compensation and Other Information” and “Board Matters and Corporate Governance” in the Proxy Statement.

 

ITEM 12 - SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

The information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Executive Compensation and Other Information” in the Proxy Statement.

 

ITEM 13 – CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

 

The information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference from the subsection entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions; Transactions with Related Persons” and the section entitled “Board Matters and Corporate Governance” in the Proxy Statement.

 

ITEM 14 – PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

 

The information required by Item 14 is incorporated by reference from the section of the proposal entitled “Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy Statement.

  

 

 

 2441 

 

 

PART IV

 

ITEM 15 – EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

(a)        

 

(1)       Financial Statements. The consolidated financial statements are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K beginning on page F-1.

 

(2)       Financial Statement Schedules. All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the information is either not applicable or required or was included in the financial statements or notes included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

(3)       List of Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K. See part (b) below.

 

(b)       Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed or furnished with this report. Those exhibits marked with a (†) refer to management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.

 

25

EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
2.1 (4)^ Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated July 23, 2014, by and among the Company, Cognigen Corporation and the other parties thereto. (13)^
3.1 (2) Articles of Incorporation of the Company. (5)
3.2 (2) Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company. (5)
4.1Articles of Incorporation of the Company. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 hereof)
4.2Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 hereof)
4.3 (1) Form of Common Stock Certificate (1)Certificate.
4.44.2 (1) Share Exchange Agreement (1)Agreement.
10.1 (1) (†) The Company’s 1996 Stock Option Plan and forms of agreements relating thereto (1) (†)thereto.
10.2(a)10.2 (3) (†) Exclusive License Software Agreement by and between the Company and Therapeutic Systems Research Laboratories dated June 30, 1997. (2)
10.2(b)Termination and Non-Assertion Agreement entered into on May 15, 2014 by and between the Company and TSRL, Inc. (11)
10.3(a)The Company’s 2007 Stock Option Plan. (3) (†)
10.3(b)The Company’s 2007 Stock Option Plan, as amended as of December 6, 2013. (10) (†)amended.
10.4(a)10.3 (10) Lease dated May 12, 2005 by and between Freeway Ventures, LLC and the Company. (6)
10.4(b)Notice of Election to Extend Term of Lease by and between the Company and Crest Development LLC (formerly Freeway Ventures LLC) dated July 29, 2010.(4)
10.4(c)One Amendment to Lease by and between the Company and Crest Development LLC entered into as of May 23, 2013. (8)
10.4(d)Second Amendment to Lease by and between the Company and Crest Development LLC, Entered intodated as of May 1, 2016*2016.
10.510.4 (5) (†) Stock Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, Words+, Inc., and Prentke Romich Company dated November 15, 2011. (7)
10.6Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Walter S. Woltosz, dated as of August 28, 2014. (12) (†)
10.7Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Thaddeus H Grasela Jr. dated as of September 2, 2014. (12) (†)
10.8Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Walter S. Woltosz, dated as of July 9, 2015. (9) (†)
10.9Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Walter S. Woltosz, dated as of August 8, 2016. (15) (†)
10.1010.5 (6) Form of Indemnification Agreement. (16)
10.6 (8)2017 Equity Incentive Plan.
10.7 (7)Stock Purchase Agreement by and among Simulation Plus, Inc., DILIsym Services, Inc., The Shareholders’ Representative and The Shareholders of DILIsym Services, Inc., dated as of May 1, 2017.
10.8 (9)(†)Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Walter S. Woltosz, dated as of September 1, 2017.
10.9 (9) (†)Employment Agreement by and between the Company and John DiBella, dated as of September 1, 2017.
10.10 (9) (†)Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Thaddeus H Grasela Jr., dated as of September 2, 2017.
10.11 (11) (†)Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Shawn O’Connor dated June 26, 2018
21.1 * List of Subsidiaries*Subsidiaries.
23.1 * Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm*Firm.
31.v131.1 * Section 302 – Certification of the Principal Executive Officer*Officer.
31.v231.2 * Section 302 – Certification of the Principal Financial Officer*Officer.
32.v132.1 * Section 906 – Certification of the Chief Executive Office and Chief Financial Officer**Officer.
101v.INS101.INS ** XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH ** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL ** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF ** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB ** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE ** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

 42 

 

__________________________

^Schedules and exhibits omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Registration S-K. The registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule to the SEC upon request.
*Filed herewithherewith.
**Furnished herewithThe XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing or document.
(1)Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Registration No. 333-6680) filed on March 25, 1997.
(2)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-KSB10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1997.2010.
(3)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed April 9, 2014.
(4)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K/A filed November 18, 2014.
(5)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 11, 2016.
(6)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 10, 2016.
(7)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed July 10, 2017.
(8)Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Schedule 14A filed December 29. 2016.
(9)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 6, 2017.
(10)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009.2016.
(4)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010.
(5)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011.
(6)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006.
(7)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 16, 2011.
(8)(11)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed July 10, 2013.
(9)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K filed November 18, 2013.
(10)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed April 9, 2014.
(11)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 19, 2014.
(12)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 4, 2014.
(13)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K/A filed November 18, 2014.
(14)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K filed July 15, 2015.
(15)Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 11, 2016.
(16).Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 10, 20162018.

 

(c)       Financial Statement Schedule.

 

See Item 15(a)(2) above.

 2643 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

November 14, 201613, 2019

 

 SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC.
  
  By:/s/ John R. Kneisel
  John R. Kneisel
Chief Financial Officer

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature

Title
  

                    /s/ Walter S. Woltosz                     

Walter S. Woltosz

Chairman of the Board of Directors and /s/ Shawn O’ConnorChief Executive Officer (Principal executive officer)

Shawn O’Connor
November 14, 2016

13, 2019
 
  

                 /s/ Dr. Thaddeus H. Grasela                     

Thaddeus H. Grasela

President and Director/s/ Walter S. WoltoszChairman of the CompanyBoard of Directors

Walter S. Woltosz
November 14, 2016

13, 2019
 
  

                 /s/

/s/ Dr. David Z. D’Argenio                  

Dr. David Z. D’Argenio

Lisa LaVange
Director

Lisa LaVange
November 14, 2016

13, 2019
 
  

                    /s/

/s/ Dr. David L. Ralph                      

Dr. David L. Ralph

Daniel Weiner
Director

Dr. Daniel Weiner
November 14, 2016

13, 2019
 
  

                   /s/

/s/ Dr. John K. Paglia                  

John K. Paglia

David L. Ralph
Director

Dr. David L. Ralph
November 14, 2016

13, 2019
 
  

                   /s/

/s/ Dr. John K. PagliaDirector
John K. Paglia
November 13, 2019
/s/ John R. Kneisel

John R. Kneisel

Chief Financial Officer of the Company (Principal financial
John R. Kneiselofficer and principal accounting officer)
November 14, 201613, 2019
 

 

 

 

 2744 

 

 

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

CONTENTS

August 31, 20162019, 2018 and 2015

2017

 

 Page
  
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMF-2 - F-3
  
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
  
Consolidated Balance SheetsF-4
  
Consolidated Statements of OperationsF-5
  
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ EquityF-6
  
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsF-7
  
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-8 – F-24F-27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 F-1 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Simulations Plus, Inc. and Subsidiary

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Simulations Plus, Inc. (a California corporation) and subsidiarysubsidiaries (the “Company”)Company) as of August 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidatedthree-year period ended August 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Simulations Plus, Inc. and subsidiary atthe Company as of August 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, and the consolidated results of their incomeits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the years thenin the three-year period ended August 31, 2019, in conformity with U.S.accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles.in the United States of America.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), Simulations Plus, Inc. and subsidiary’sthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2016,2019, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework)(COSO), and our report dated November 14, 201613, 2019, expressed an adverseunqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

 

/s/ Rose, Snyder & Jacobs LLP

 

Rose, Snyder & Jacobs LLP

 

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2004.

Encino, California

 

November 14, 201613, 2019

 

 

 F-2 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of
Simulations Plus, Inc.

 

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Simulations Plus, Inc. and subsidiary’ssubsidiaries (the Company’s) internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2016,2019, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (“(COSO). In our opinion, the COSO Criteria”).Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2019, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by COSO.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of Simulations Plus, Inc. and Subsidiary’ssubsidiaries as of August 31, 2019 and 2018 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 31,2019 and related notes, and our report dated November 13, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’sManagement Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified and included in management’s assessment:

-Ineffective information technology (IT) controls

This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2016 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated November 14, 2016, on those consolidated financial statements.

In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, Simulations Plus, Inc. and Subsidiary has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework).

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows of Simulations Plus, Inc. and Subsidiary, and our report dated November 14, 2016, expressed an unqualified opinion.

/s/ Rose, Snyder & Jacobs LLP

 

Rose, Snyder & Jacobs LLP

  

Encino, California

 

November 14, 2016

13, 2019

 

 

 F-3 

 

 

 

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of August 31


 

 August 31, August 31, 
 2019  2018 
ASSETSASSETS         
 2016  2015 
Current assets                
Cash and cash equivalents $8,030,284  $8,551,275  $11,435,499  $9,400,701 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0  3,009,517   1,593,707   5,026,558   5,514,528 
Revenues in excess of billings  694,131   795,125   3,233,659   1,985,596 
Prepaid income taxes  555,486      765,110   312,593 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  410,811   381,718   704,316   610,439 
Deferred income taxes  228,713   210,972 
Total current assets  12,928,942   11,532,797   21,165,142   17,823,857 
Long-term assets                
Capitalized computer software development costs, net of accumulated amortization of $8,613,487 and $7,632,421  4,013,127   3,798,339 
Capitalized computer software development costs, net of accumulated amortization of $12,356,055 and $11,095,903  4,959,736   5,152,594 
Property and equipment, net (note 4)  256,381   413,510   341,145   335,224 
Intellectual property, net of accumulated amortization of $1,408,750 and $801,250  4,666,250   5,273,750 
Other intangible assets net of accumulated amortization of $295,000 and $147,500  1,355,000   1,502,500 
Intellectual property, net of accumulated amortization of $3,948,750 and $3,019,584  5,026,249   5,905,416 
Other intangible assets net of accumulated amortization of $1,210,000 and $852,500  3,280,000   3,637,500 
Goodwill  4,789,248   4,789,248   10,387,198   10,387,198 
Other assets  34,082   34,082   37,227   37,227 
Total assets $28,043,030  $27,344,226  $45,196,697  $43,279,016 
                
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITYLIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY          
Current liabilities                
Accounts payable $108,111  $209,407  $204,075  $351,605 
Accrued payroll and other expenses  481,610   429,580   1,639,038   1,152,176 
Accrued bonuses to officers  121,000   121,000 
Income taxes payable     43,602 
Other current liabilities  8,274   19,859 
Current portion - Contracts payable (note 5)  1,000,000   2,604,404   1,761,028   2,556,644 
Billings in excess of revenues  230,100   106,534   798,549   384,603 
Deferred revenue  176,422   78,945   380,787   381,928 
Total current liabilities  2,125,517   3,613,331   4,783,477   4,826,956 
                
Long-term liabilities                
Deferred income taxes  3,184,919   3,190,419 
Deferred income taxes,net  2,731,616   3,195,139 
Payments due under Contracts payable (note 5)     1,000,000      3,334,296 
Other long-term liabilities     8,274 
Total liabilities $5,310,436  $7,812,024   7,515,093   11,356,391 
                
Commitments and contingencies(note 6)                
                
Shareholders' equity(note 7)                
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value 10,000,000 shares authorized no shares issued and outstanding $  $  $  $ 
Common stock, $0.001 par value 50,000,000 shares authorized 17,225,478 and 16,943,001 shares issued and outstanding  7,227   5,414 
Common stock, $0.001 par value 50,000,000 shares authorized 17,591,834 and 17,416,445 shares issued and outstanding  7,595   7,417  
Additional paid-in capital  11,376,007   9,714,290   15,319,474   13,453,668 
Retained earnings  11,349,360   9,812,498   22,354,535   18,461,540 
Total shareholders' equity $22,732,594  $19,532,202   37,681,604   31,922,625 
        
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $28,043,030  $27,344,226  $45,196,697  $43,279,016 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

 F-4 

 

 

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC.


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended August 31,


 

 2016  2015  2019  2018  2017 
            
Net Revenues $19,972,079  $18,314,248 
Revenues $33,970,440  $29,666,524  $24,137,913 
Cost of revenues  4,601,513   4,392,477   9,025,704   7,994,228   6,307,800 
Gross margin  15,370,566   13,921,771   24,944,736   21,672,296   17,830,113 
Operating expenses                    
Selling, general, and administrative  6,693,691   6,736,767   11,796,027   9,583,852   8,198,184 
Research and development  1,445,069   1,328,476   2,499,980   1,790,656   1,367,645 
Total operating expenses  8,138,760   8,065,243   14,296,007   11,374,508   9,565,829 
                    
Income from operations  7,231,806   5,856,528   10,648,729   10,297,788   8,264,284 
                    
Other income (expense)                    
Interest income  18,014   17,935   33,522   27,122   15,857 
Gain(loss) on currency exchange  (13,428)  (181,534)
Interest expense  (109,078)  (153,034)  (38,188)
(Loss) income on currency exchange  (16,697)  (32,934)  (1,686)
Total other income (expense)  4,586   (163,599)  (92,253)  (158,846)  (24,017)
Income from operations before provision for income taxes  7,236,392   5,692,929 
            
Income before provision for income taxes  10,556,476   10,138,942   8,240,267 
Provision for income taxes  (2,286,256)  (1,849,968)  (1,973,147)  (1,204,130)  (2,452,670)
Net Income $4,950,136  $3,842,961  $8,583,329  $8,934,812  $5,787,597 
                    
Earnings per share                    
Basic $0.29  $0.23  $0.49  $0.52  $0.34 
Diluted $0.29  $0.23  $0.48  $0.50  $0.33 
                    
Weighted-average common shares outstanding                    
Basic  17,028,566   16,864,670   17,492,258   17,328,707   17,239,490 
Diluted  17,209,506   17,032,158   18,057,431   17,860,392   17,515,917 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 F-5 

 

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC.


STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
For the years ended August 31, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017


 

    Additional          Additional     
Common Stock Paid-In Retained    Common Stock  Paid-In  Retained    
Shares Amount Capital Earnings Total  Shares  Amount  Capital  Earnings  Total 
                     
Balance, August 31, 2014 16,349,955 $4,821 $6,085,427 $9,345,103 $15,435,351 
Balance, August 31, 2016  17,225,478  $7,227  $11,376,007  $11,349,360  $22,732,594 
                               
Exercise of stock options 101,887 102 56,941  57,043   49,642   49   111,355       111,404 
                               
Stock-based Compensation   295,243  295,243           585,018       585,018 
                               
Issuance of stock-Cognigen Acquisition 491,159 491 3,276,679  3,277,170 
Shares issued to Directors for services  2,484   2   36,761       36,763 
                               
Declaration of Dividend    (3,375,566) (3,375,566)              (3,448,489)  (3,448,489)
                               
Net income       3,842,961  3,842,961               5,787,597   5,787,597 
                               
Beginning balance August 31, 2015 16,943,001 $5,414 $9,714,290 $9,812,498 $19,532,202 
           
Balance, August 31, 2017  17,277,604  $7,278  $12,109,141  $13,688,468  $25,804,887 
                               
Exercise of stock options 112,463 113 181,936  182,049   130,006   131   635,452      635,583 
                               
Stock-based Compensation   347,077  347,077         562,078      562,078 
                               
Issuance of stock-Cognigen Acquisition 170,014 1,700 1,132,704  1,134,404 
Shares issued to Directors for services  8,835   8   146,997      147,005 
                               
Declaration of Dividend    (3,413,274) (3,413,274)           (4,161,740)  (4,161,740)
                               
Net income       4,950,136  4,950,136            8,934,812   8,934,812 
                               
Balance, August 31, 2016 17,225,478 $7,227 $11,376,007 $11,349,360 $22,732,594 
Balance, August 31, 2018  17,416,445  $7,417  $13,453,668  $18,461,540  $31,922,625 
                    
Cumulative Effect of Changes related to adoption of ASC 606           (493,279)  (493,279)
                    
Exercise of stock options  166,703   168   787,979      788,147 
                    
Stock-based Compensation         865,848      865,848 
                    
Shares issued to Directors for services  8,686   10   211,979      211,989 
                    
Declaration of Dividend     2      (4,197,055)  (4,197,055)
                    
Net income           8,583,329   8,583,329 
                    
Balance, August 31, 2019  17,591,834  $7,595  $15,319,474  $22,354,535  $37,681,604 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 F-6 

 

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC.


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended August 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017


 

 2016  2015  2019  2018  2017 
Cash flows from operating activities                    
Net income $4,950,136  $3,842,961  $8,583,329  $8,934,812  $5,787,597 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities                    
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment  196,250   211,454 
Amortization of capitalized computer software development costs  981,066   1,023,139 
Amortization of Intellectual Property  755,000   755,000 
Depreciation and amortization  2,750,245   2,721,304   2,135,078 
Change in value of contingent consideration  109,060   152,752   38,188 
Stock-based compensation  347,077  ��295,243   1,077,837   709,083   621,781 
Deferred income taxes  (23,241)  55,919   (299,096)  (1,731,821)  (178,374)
(Increase) decrease in                    
Accounts receivable  (1,415,810)  1,048,969   487,970   (1,465,803)  (876,231)
Revenues in excess of billings  100,994   (238,502)  (1,248,063)  (504,514)  (634,409)
Prepaid income taxes  (555,486)  748,359   (452,517)  149,850   93,043 
Prepaid expenses and other assets  (29,093)  (104,836)  (93,877)  (153,682)  40,528 
Increase (decrease) in                    
Accounts payable  (101,296)  19,443   (147,529)  110,713   99,337 
Accrued payroll and other expenses  52,030   (355,567)  486,862   168,883   283,831 
Accrued bonus     1,000 
Billings in excess of revenues  123,566   (239,906)  413,946   167,645   (118,061)
Accrued income taxes  (43,602)  43,602         (153,713)
Other liabilities  (19,859)  (19,860)        (8,274)
Deferred revenue  97,477   48,573   (29,747)  27,966   (252,582)
Net cash provided by operating activities  5,415,209   7,134,991   11,638,420   9,287,188   6,877,739 
                    
Cash flows from investing activities        
Cash flows used in investing activities            
Purchases of property and equipment  (39,121)  (71,369)  (137,745)  (183,291)  (175,961)
Cash used to purchase Cognigen  (720,000)  (2,080,000)
Purchases of intellectual property  (50,000)      
Cash used to acquire subsidiaries        (4,515,982)
Cash received in acquisition     190,184         1,720,434 
Capitalized computer software development costs  (1,195,854)  (1,168,937)  (1,767,996)  (2,145,429)  (1,383,711)
Net cash (used in) investing activities  (1,954,975)  (3,130,122)
Net cash used in investing activities  (1,955,741)  (2,328,720)  (4,355,220)
                    
Cash flows from financing activities        
Payment of Dividends  (3,413,274)  (3,375,566)
Cash flows used in financing activities            
Payment of dividends  (4,197,055)  (4,161,740)  (3,448,489)
Payments on Contracts Payable  (750,000)  (750,000)  (4,238,973)  (247,328)  (1,000,000)
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options  182,049   57,043   788,147   635,583   111,404 
Net cash (used in) financing activities of continuing operations  (3,981,225)  (4,068,523)
Net cash used in financing activities  (7,647,881)  (3,773,485)  (4,337,085)
                    
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (520,991)  (63,654)  2,034,798   3,184,983   (1,814,566)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year  8,551,275   8,614,929   9,400,701   6,215,718   8,030,284 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $8,030,284  $8,551,275  $11,435,499  $9,400,701  $6,215,718 
                    
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information                    
Income taxes paid $2,908,587  $961,907  $2,673,475  $2,712,988  $2,687,921 
                    
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities                    
Stock issued for acquisition of Cognigen Corporation $1,134,404  $3,277,170 
Creation of contract liability for acquisition of Cognigen Corporation $  $1,854,404 
Creation of contract liabilities for acquisition of subsidiaries $  $  $5,738,188 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 F-7 

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2016 and 2015

 

Simulations Plus, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

For the Year Ended August 31, 2019

 

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND LINES OF BUSINESS

 

Organization

Simulations Plus, Inc. (the “Company”(“Simulations Plus”, “we”, “us”, “our”“Lancaster”) was incorporated on July 17, 1996. OnIn September 2, 2014, Simulations Plus Inc. acquired all of the outstanding equity interests of Cognigen Corporation (“Cognigen”, “Buffalo”) pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement and Cognigen became a wholly owned subsidiary of Simulations Plus, Inc. Simulations Plus, Inc. In June 2017, Simulations Plus acquired DILIsym Services, Inc. (DILIsym) as a wholly owned subsidiary (collectively, the "Company"“Company”, “we”, “us”, “our”).

 

Lines of Business

The Company designs and develops pharmaceutical simulation software to promote cost-effective solutions to a number of problems in pharmaceutical research and in the education of pharmacy and medical students, and it provides consulting services to the pharmaceutical and chemical industries. Recently, the Company has begun to explore developing software applications for defense and for health care outside of the pharmaceutical industry.

 

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Simulations Plus, Inc. and, as of September 2, 2014, its wholly owned subsidiary, Cognigen Corporation.Corporation, and as of June 1, 2017 the accounts of DILIsym Services, Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

 

Use of Estimates

Our financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management’s application of accounting policies. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant accounting policies for us include revenue recognition, accounting for capitalized computer software development costs, valuation of stock options, and accounting for income taxes.

 

Reclassifications

Certain numbers in the prior year have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation.

 

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenuesIn May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09 and its related amendments regarding Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606 (ASC Topic 606),Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The standard provides principles for recognizing revenue for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers with the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard also provides guidance on the recognition of incremental costs related to obtaining customer contracts. We adopted ASC Topic 606, effective September 1, 2018, utilizing the modified retrospective method. This approach was applied to contracts that were in process as of September 1, 2018, and the corresponding incremental costs of obtaining those contracts, which resulted in a cumulative effect adjustment of $493,279 to the opening balance of retained earnings at the date of adoption. The adoption of this ASU primarily impacts the timing of our revenue recognition for certain sales contracts, the capitalization and amortization of incremental costs of obtaining a contract, and related disclosures. The reported results for fiscal year 2019 reflect the application of ASC Topic 606, while the reported results for fiscal year 2018 are not adjusted and continue to be reported under ASC Topic 605.

We generate revenue primarily from the sale of software licenses and software maintenance in accordance with the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 985-605, “Software – Revenue Recognition”. Software product revenue is recorded when the following conditions are met: 1) evidence of arrangement exists; 2) delivery has been made; 3) the amount is fixed; and 4) collectability is probable. Post-contract customer support (“PCS”) obligations are insignificant; therefore, revenue for PCS is recognized at the same time as the licensing fee, and the costs of providing such supportconsulting services are accrued and amortized over the obligation period.

As a byproduct of ongoing improvements and upgrades for the new programs and new modules of software, some modifications are provided to our customers who have already purchased software at no additional charge. Other software modifications result in new, additional cost modules that expand the functionality of the software. These are licensed separately. We consider the modifications that are provided without charge to be minimal, as they do not significantly change the basic functionality or utility of the software, but rather add convenience, such as being able to plot some additional variable on a graph in addition to the numerous variables that had been available before, or adding some additional calculations to supplement the information provided from running the software. Such software modificationspharmaceutical industry for any single product have typically occurred once or twice per year, sometimes more, sometimes less. Thus, they are infrequent. The Company provides, for a fee, additional training and service calls to its customers and recognizes revenue at the time the training or service call is provided.

Generally, we enter into one-year license agreements with customers for the use of our pharmaceutical software products. We recognize revenue on these contracts when all the criteria are met. Most license agreements have a term of one year; however, from time to time, we enter into multi-year license agreements. We generally unlock and invoice software one year at a time for multi-year licenses. Therefore, revenue is recognized one year at a time. Certain of the Company's software products are housed and supported on the Company's computer networks. Software revenues for those products are included in income over the life of the contract.drug development.

 

 

 

 F-8 

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2016 and 2015

 

The Company determines revenue recognition through the following steps:

i.Identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer
ii.Identification of the performance obligations in the contract
iii.Determination of the transaction price
iv.Allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract
v.Recognition of revenue when, or as, the Company satisfies a performance obligation

Deferred Commissions

Sales commissions earned by our sales force and our commissioned sales representatives are considered incremental and recoverable costs of obtaining a contract with a customer. Sales commissions for new contracts are deferred and then amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of benefit. We recognize revenue from collaboration researchdetermined the period of benefit by taking into consideration our customer contracts, our technology and revenue from grants equallyother factors. Sales commissions for renewal contracts are deferred and then amortized on a straight-line basis over their terms. For contract revenues basedthe related contractual renewal period. Amortization expense is included in sales and marketing expenses on actual hoursthe condensed consolidated statements of operations.

We apply the practical expedient in ASC Topic 606 to expense costs as incurred we recognize revenuesfor sales commissions when the work is performed. For fixed priceperiod of benefit would have been one year or less. Most of our contracts we recognize contract studyare of a duration of one year or less, few, if any of the longer-term contracts have commissions associated with them.

Practical Expedients and other contract revenues using the percentage-of-completion method, depending upon how the contract studies are engaged, in accordance with ASC 605-35, “Exemptions

Revenue Recognition – Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts”. To recognize revenue using the percentage-of-completion method, we must determine whether we meet

The Company has elected the following criteria: 1) there is a long-term, legally enforceable contract, 2) it is possible to reasonably estimate the total project costs, and 3) it is possible to reasonably estimate the extent of progress toward completion.additional practical expedients in applying Topic 606:

·Commission Expense: We apply the practical expedient in ASC Topic 606 to expense costs as incurred for sales commissions when the period of benefit is one year or less. Most of our contracts are of a duration of one year or less, few, if any of the longer-term contracts have commissions associated with them.

·

Transaction Price Allocated to Future Performance Obligations

ASC 606 requires that the Company disclose the aggregate amount of transaction price that is allocated to performance obligations that have not yet been satisfied as of August 31, 2019. ASC 606 provides certain practical expedients that limit the requirement to disclose the aggregate amount of transaction price allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations.

The Company applied the practical expedient to not disclose the amount of transaction price allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations when the performance obligation is part of a contract that has an original expected duration of one year or less.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

 

Accounts Receivable

We analyze the age of customer balances, historical bad debt experience, customer creditworthiness, and changes in customer payment terms when making estimates of the collectability of the Company’s trade accounts receivable balances. If we determine that the financial conditions of any of our customers have deteriorated, whether due to customer-specific or general economic issues, an increase in the allowance may be made. Accounts receivable are written off when all collection attempts have failed.

F-9

 

Capitalized Computer Software Development Costs

Software development costs are capitalized in accordance with ASC 985-20,“Costs of Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Marketed”. Capitalization of software development costs begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility and is discontinued when the product is available for sale.

 

The establishment of technological feasibility and the ongoing assessment for recoverability of capitalized software development costs require considerable judgment by management with respect to certain external factors including, but not limited to, technological feasibility, anticipated future gross revenues, estimated economic life, and changes in software and hardware technologies. Capitalized computer software development costs are comprised primarily of salaries and direct payroll-related costs and the purchase of existing software to be used in the Company's software products.

 

Amortization of capitalized computer software development costs is provided on a product-by-product basis on the straight-line method over the estimated economic life of the products not to exceed five years. Amortization of software development costs amounted to $981,066$1,331,753, $1,300,434, and $1,023,139$1,096,967 for the years ended August 31, 20162019, 2018, and 2015,2017, respectively. We expect future amortization expense to vary due to increases in capitalized computer software development costs.

 

We test capitalized computer software development costs for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

 

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost, or fair market value for property and equipment acquired in business combinations, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives as follows:

 

Equipment5 years
Computer equipment3 to 7 years
Furniture and fixtures5 to 7 years
Leasehold improvementsShorter of life of asset or lease

 

Maintenance and minor replacements are charged to expense as incurred. Gains and losses on disposals are included in the results of operations.

  

F-9

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2016 and 2015

Intangible Assets and Goodwill

The Company performs valuations of assets acquired and liabilities assumed on each acquisition accounted for as a business combination and recognizes the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their acquisition date fair value. Acquired intangible assets include customer relationships, software, trade name, and non-compete agreements. The Company determines the appropriate useful life by performing an analysis of expected cash flows based on historical experience of the acquired businesses. Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method, which approximates the pattern in which the majority of the economic benefits are expected to be consumed.

 

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the fair value of the acquired net assets. Goodwill is not amortized, instead it is tested for impairment annually or when events or circumstances change that would indicate that goodwill might be impaired. Events or circumstances that could trigger an impairment review include, but are not limited to, a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, unanticipated competition, a loss of key personnel, significant changes in the manner of the Company's use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the Company's overall business, significant negative industry or economic trends or significant under-performance relative to expected historical or projected future results of operations.

 

Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is one level below or the same as an operating segment. As of August 31, 2016,2019, the Company determined that it has twothree reporting units, Simulations Plus, Cognigen Corporation and Cognigen Corporation.DILIsym Services, Inc. When testing goodwill for impairment, the Company first performs a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is necessary to perform step one of a two-step annual goodwill impairment test for each reporting unit. The Company is required to perform step one only if it concludes that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit's fair value is less than its carrying value. Should this be the case, the first step of the two-step process is to identify whether a potential impairment exists by comparing the estimated fair values of the Company's reporting units with their respective book values, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit exceeds book value, goodwill is considered not to be impaired, and no additional steps are necessary. If, however, the fair value of the reporting unit is less than book value, then the second step is performed to determine if goodwill is impaired and to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The amount of the impairment loss is the excess of the carrying amount of the goodwill over its implied fair value. The estimate of implied fair value of goodwill is primarily based on an estimate of the discounted cash flows expected to result from that reporting unit, but may require valuations of certain internally generated and unrecognized intangible assets such as the Company's software, technology, patents and trademarks. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess.

 

F-10

As of August 31, 2016,2019, the entire balance of goodwill was attributed to two of the Company's reporting units, Cognigen Corporation reporting unit.and DILIsym Services. Intangible assets subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. The Company has not recognized any impairment charges during the periods ended August 31, 20162019, 2018 and 2015.2017.

  

Reconciliation of Goodwill for the period ended August 31, 2016:2019:

 

Balance,  August 31, 2014 $ 
Addition  4,789,248 
Impairments   
Balance,  August 31, 2015 $4,789,248 
Addition   
Impairments   
Balance,  August 31, 2016 $4,789,248 

F-10

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2016 and 2015

  Cognigen  DILIsym  Total 
Balance, August 31, 2016 $4,789,248  $  $4,789,248 
Addition     5,597,950   5,597,950 
Impairments         
Balance, August 31, 2017  4,789,248   5,597,950   10,387,198 
Addition         
Impairments         
Balance, August 31, 2018  4,789,248   5,597,950   10,387,198 
Addition         
Impairments         
Balance, August 31, 2019 $4,789,248  $5,597,950  $10,387,198 

 

Other Intangible Assets

The following table summarizes other intangible assets as of August 31, 2016:2019:

 

  Amortization
Period
 Acquisition
Value
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Net book
value
 
Customer relationships Straight line 8 years $1,100,000  $275,000  $825,000 
Trade Name-Cognigen None  500,000   0   500,000 
Covenants not to compete Straight line 5 years  50,000   20,000   30,000 
    $1,650,000  $295,000  $1,355,000 
  Amortization
Period
 Acquisition
Value
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Net book
value
 
Customer relationships-Cognigen Straight line 8 years $1,100,000  $687,500  $412,500 
Trade Name-Cognigen None  500,000   0   500,000 
Covenants not to compete-Cognigen Straight line 5 years  50,000   50,000   0 
Covenants not to compete-DILIsym Straight line 4 years  80,000   45,000   35,000 
Trade Name-DILIsym None  860,000   0   860,000 
Customer relationships-DILIsym Straight line 8 years  1,900,000   427,500   1,472,500 
    $4,490,000  $1,210,500  $3,280,000 

  

Amortization expense for the year ended August 31, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 was $147,500.$357,500, $357,500, and $200,000.

 

Future amortization for the next five years is as follows:

 

Year ending

August 31,

Amount Amount 
2017147,500
2018147,500
2019147,500
2020137,500 $347,500 
2021137,500 $342,500 
2022 $327,500 
2023 $190,000 
2024 $190,000 

 

Business Acquisitions

The Company accounted for the acquisition of Cognigen and DILIsym Services, Inc., using the purchase method of accounting where the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recognized based on their respective estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Determining the fair value of certain acquired assets and liabilities is subjective in nature and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including, but not limited to, the selection of appropriate valuation methodology, projected revenue, expenses and cash flows, weighted average cost of capital, discount rates, estimates of advertiser and publisher turnover rates and estimates of terminal values. Business acquisitions are included in the Company's consolidated financial statements as of the date of the acquisition.

 

F-11

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Financial assetsAssets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the Company’sCondensed Balance SheetSheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. The categories, as defined by the standard are as follows:

 

Level Input: Input Definition:
Level I Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.
Level II Inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level I, that are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration with market data at the measurement date.
Level III Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.

 

F-11

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2016 and 2015

For certain of our financial instruments, including accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued payroll and other expenses, and accrued bonuses to officers the carrying amounts are approximate fair value due to their short-term nature.

 

The following table summarizes fair value measurements at August 31, 2019 and August 31, 2018 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

August 31, 2019:

  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
Cash and cash equivalents $11,435,499  $  $  $11,435,499 
Acquisition-related contingent consideration obligations $  $  $1,761,028  $1,761,028 

August 31, 2018:

  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
Cash and cash equivalents $9,400,701  $  $  $9,400,701 
Acquisition-related contingent consideration obligations $  $  $4,890,940  $4,890,940 

As of August 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company has a liability for contingent consideration related to its acquisition of the DILIsym Services, Inc. The fair value measurement of the contingent consideration obligations is determined using Level 3 inputs. The fair value of contingent consideration obligations is based on a discounted cash flow model using a probability-weighted income approach. These fair value measurements represent Level 3 measurements as they are based on significant inputs not observable in the market. Significant judgment is employed in determining the appropriateness of these assumptions as of the acquisition date and for each subsequent period. Accordingly, changes in assumptions could have a material impact on the amount of contingent consideration expense the Company records in any given period. Changes in the value of the contingent consideration obligations are recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The following is a reconciliation of contingent consideration value.

Value at August 31, 2018 $4,890,940 
Purchase price contingent consideration   
Contingent consideration payments  (3,238,972)
Change in value of contingent consideration  109,060 
Value at August 31, 2019 $1,761,028 

Advertising

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising costs for the years ended August 31, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 were approximately $131,783$83,213, $67,848 and $38,000,$58,445, respectively.

F-12

 

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred until technological feasibility has been established. These costs include salaries, laboratory experiment, and purchased software which was developed by other companies and incorporated into, or used in the development of, our final products.

 

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740-10,“Income Taxes” which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns.

 

Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The provision for income taxes represents the tax payable for the period and the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.

  

Intellectual property

On February 28, 2012, we bought out the royalty agreement with Enslein Research. The cost of $75,000 is being amortized over 10 years under the straight-line method. Amortization expense for each of the fiscal years ended August 31, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 was $7,500. Accumulated amortization as of August 31, 20162019 and 20152018 was $33,750$56,250 and $26,250,$48,750, respectively.

 

On May 15, 2014, we entered into a termination and non-assertion agreement with TSRL, Inc., pursuant to which the parties agreed to terminate an exclusive software licensing agreement entered into between the parties in 1997. As a result, the companyCompany obtained a perpetual right to use certain source code and data, and TSRL relinquished any rights and claims to any GastroPlus products and to any claims to royalties or other payments under that 1997 agreement. We agreed to pay TSRL total consideration of $6,000,000, which is being amortized over 10 years under the straight-line method. Amortization for the year ended August 31, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 was $600,000. Accumulated amortization as of August 31, 20162019 and 20152018 was $1,375,000$3,175,000 and $775,000,$2,575,000, respectively. (See Note 5)

On June 1, 2017, as part of the acquisition of DILIsym Services, Inc. the Company acquired certain developed technologies associated with the drug induced liver disease (DILI). These technologies were valued at $2,850,000 and are being amortized over 9 years under the straight-line method. Amortization expense for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2019 and 2018 was $316,667 and $316,667, respectively, and is included in cost of revenues. Total accumulated amortization as of August 31, 2019 and 2018 was $712,513 and $395,833, respectively.

In September 2018, we purchased certain intellectual property rights of Entelos Holding Company, a Delaware Corporation. The cost of $50,000 is being amortized over 10 years under the straight-line method. Amortization expense for the year ended August 31, 2019 was $5,000. Accumulated amortization as of August 31, 2019 was $5,000.

 

Total amortization expense for intellectual property agreements for the years ended August 31, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 was $607,500.$929,167, $924,167, and $686,667. Accumulated amortization as of August 31, 20162019 and 20152018 was $1,408,750$3,948,750 and $801,250,$3,019,584, respectively.

 

Future amortization for the next five years is as follows:

 

Year ending August 31,

TSRLEnslienTotal
2017$ 600,000$ 7,500$ 607,500
2018$ 600,000$ 7,500$ 607,500
2019$ 600,000$ 7,500$ 607,500
2020$ 600,000$ 7,500$ 607,500
2021$ 600,000$ 7,500$ 607,500
Years ending
August 31,
 TSRL  Enslein  DILI-Acquired
Developed
Technologies
  Entelos  Total 
2020 $600,000  $7,500  $316,667  $5,000  $929,167 
2021 $600,000  $7,500  $316,667  $5,000  $929,167 
2022 $600,000  $3,750  $316,667  $5,000  $925,417 
2023 $600,000     $316,667  $5,000  $921,667 
2024 $425,000     $316,667  $5,000  $746,667 

 

 

 F-12F-13 

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2016 and 2015

 

Earnings per Share

The Company reports earnings per share in accordance with FASB ACS 260-10. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares available. Diluted earnings per share is computed similarly to basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. The components of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended August 31, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 were as follows:

 

  2016  2015 
Numerator      
Net income attributable to common shareholders $4,950,136  $3,842,961 
         
Denominator        
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year  17,028,566   16,864,670 
Dilutive effect of stock options  180,940   167,488 
         
Common stock and common stock equivalents used for diluted earnings per share  17,209,506   17,032,158 

  2019  2018  2017 
Numerator            
Net income attributable to common shareholders $8,583,329  $8,934,812  $5,787,897 
             
Denominator            
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year  17,492,258   17,328,707   17,239,490 
Dilutive effect of stock options  565,173   531,685   276,427 
             
Common stock and common stock equivalents used for diluted earnings per share  18,057,431   17,860,392   17,515,917 

  

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock options using the modified prospective method in accordance with FASB ASC 718-10,“Compensation-Stock Compensation”. Under this method, compensation costs include estimated grant date fair value of the awards amortized over the options’ vesting period. Stock-based compensation was $347,077$865,848, $562,078 and $295,243$585,018 for the fiscal years ended August 31, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively, and is included in the statements of operations as Consulting, Salaries, and Research and Development expense.

 

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

The Company accounts for the impairment and disposition of long-lived assets in accordance with ASC 350,“Intangibles – Goodwill and Other” and ASC 360,“Property and Equipment”. Long-lived assets to be held and used are reviewed for events or changes in circumstances that indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. We measure recoverability by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to the expected future undiscounted net cash flows generated by the asset. If we determine that the asset may not be recoverable, or if the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future undiscounted cash flows, we recognize an impairment charge to the extent of the difference between the fair value and the asset's carrying amount. No impairment losses were recorded during the years ended August 31, 20162019, 2018 and 2015.2017.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, FASBthe Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASUAccounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers.Customers(ASU 2014-09). The standard will eliminate the transaction- and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. GAAP(GAAP) and replace it with a principles-based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted. The revenue recognition standard is required to be applied retrospectively, including any combination of practical expedients as allowed in the standard. We are evaluatingIn April 2016, the impact, if any,FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which amends certain aspects of the Board's new revenue standard, ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This standard was adopted concurrently with the adoption of ASU 2014-09 to our financial statements2016-10 and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoing financial reporting.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740). The amendments in ASU 2015-17 change the requirements for the classification of deferred taxes on the balance sheet. Currently, GAAP requires an entity to separate deferred income tax liabilities and assets into current and noncurrent amounts in a classified statement of financial position. To simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes, the amendments in this ASU require that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The pronouncement isboth are effective for fiscal yearsannual and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Earlier application is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoing financial reporting.2017.

F-13

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2016 and 2015

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which supersedes existing guidance on accounting for leases in "Leases (Topic 840)" and generally requires all leases to be recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018; early adoption is permitted. The provisions of ASU 2016-02 are to be applied using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This ASU affects entities that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. The ASU is designed to simplify several aspects of accounting for share-based payment award transactions which include - the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, classification on the statement of cash flows and forfeiture rate calculations. ASU 2016-09 will become effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In April 2016, the FASB issued AS 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which amends certain aspects of the Board's new revenue standard, ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The standard should be adopted concurrently with adoption of ASU 2014-09 which is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoing financial reporting.

F-14

 

NOTE 3 – CONTRACTS IN PROGRESSREVENUE RECOGNITION

Components of revenue

The following is a description of principal activities from which the Company generates revenue. As part of the accounting for these arrangements, the Company must develop assumptions that require judgment to determine the stand-alone selling price for each performance obligation identified in the contract. Stand-alone selling prices are determined based on the prices at which the Company separately sells its services or goods.

Revenue ComponentsTypical payment terms
Software Revenues:

Software revenues are generated primarily from sales of software licenses at the time the software is unlocked and the term commences. The license period typically is one year or less. Along with the license adi minimis amount of customer support is provided to assist the customer with the software. Should the customer need more than a di minimis amount of support they can choose to enter into a separate contract for additional training. Most software is installed on our customers’ servers and the Company has no control of the software once the sale is made.

For certain software arrangements the Company hosts the licenses on servers maintained by the Company, revenue for those arrangements are accounted asSoftware as a Service over the life of the contract. These arrangements are a small portion of software revenues of the Company.

Payments are generally due upon invoicing on a net 30 basis unless other payment terms are negotiated with the customer based on customer history. Typical industry standards apply.
Consulting Contracts:

Consulting services provided to our customers are generally recognized over time as the contracts are performed and the services are rendered. The company measures its consulting revenue based on time expended compared to total estimated hours to complete a project. The Company believes the methods chosen for its contract revenue best depicts the transfer of benefits to the customer under the contracts.

Payment terms vary, depending on the size of the contract, credit history and history with the client and deliverables within the contract.

F-15

Consortium Member Based Services:

The performance obligation is recognized on a time elapsed basis, by month, for which the services are provided, as the Company transfers control evenly over the contractual period.

Payment is due at the beginning of the period, generally on a net 30 or 60 basis.

Remaining performance obligations that do not fall under the expedients require the Company to perform various consulting and software development services and consortium memberships of approximately $6,843,000. It is anticipated these revenues will be recognized within the next two and a half years.

Contract liabilities

During the year ended August 31, 2019 the Company recognized $767,000 of revenue that was included in contract liabilities as of August 31, 2019.

Disaggregation of Revenues

Disaggregation of Revenues: Year Ended
August 31, 2019
 
Software licenses    
Point in time $17,425,353 
Over time  1,053,562 
Consulting services    
Over time  15,491,525 
Total Revenue $33,970,440 

The following table summarizes the adjustments made to accounts on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 1, 2018 as a result of applying the modified retrospective method to adopt ASC Topic 606:

  

As Reported

August 31, 2018

  Adjustments to reflect the adoption of ASC Topic 606  

As Adjusted

September 1, 2018

 
Capitalized Software, net $5,152,594  $(629,100) $4,523,494 
Deferred revenue  381,928   28,606   410,534 
Deferred income taxes, net  3,195,139   (164,427)  3,030,713 
Retained Earnings $18,461,540  $(493,279) $17,968,261 

The following tables present the amount by which each condensed consolidated financial statement line item is affected as of and for the year ended August 31, 2019 by ASC Topic 606:

  Year Ended August 31, 2019 
  As Reported  Balances Without the adoption of ASC Topic 606  Effect of Change 
Revenues $33,970,440  $33,992,369  $(21,929)
Cost of revenues  9,025,704   8,824,474   201,230 
Gross profit  24,944,736   25,167,895   (223,159)
Income from operations  10,648,729   10,871,888   (223,159)
Income before provision for income taxes  10,556,476   10,779,635   (223,159)
Provision for income taxes  (1,973,147)  (2,043,571)  (70,424)
Net income $8,583,329  $8,736,064  $(152,735)
Earnings per share-diluted $0.48  $0.48  $ 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, diluted  18,057,431   18,057,431    

F-16

  Year Ended August 31, 2019 
  As Reported  Balances Without the adoption of ASC Topic 606  Effect of Change 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:            
Net income $8,583,329  $8,736,064  $(152,735)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Depreciation and amortization  2,750,245   2,890,389   (140,144)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:            
Deferred revenue  (295,966)  (274,037)  21,929 
Net cash provided by operating activities  11,438,762   11,167,812   (270,950)
Cash flows used in investing activities            
Capitalized computer software development costs $(1,767,996) $(2,109,369) $341,373 

Contracts in Progress

Contracts in progress are included in the accompanying balance sheets under the following captions:

  2019  2018 
Revenues in excess of billings $3,233,659  $1,985,596 
Billings in excess of revenues  (798,549)  (384,603)
  $2,435,110  $1,600,993 

 

Cost, estimated earnings, and billings on uncompleted contracts are summarized as follows as of August 31, 20162019 and 2015:2018:

 

 2016  2015  2019  2018 
Revenues earned to date on uncompleted contract $2,557,507  $3,155,123 
Revenues earned to date on uncompleted contracts $19,254,928  $11,794,764 
Billings to date on uncompleted contracts  (2,093,476)  (2,466,532)  (16,819,818)  (10,193,771)
 $464,031  $688,591  $2,435,110  $1,600,993 

 

ContractsBalance increases and decreases in progressthese accounts are included indue to the accompanying balance sheets under the following captions:timing of amounts billed, payments received, and revenue recognized.

  2016  2015 
Revenues in excess of billings $694,131  $795,125 
Billings in excess of revenues  (230,100)  (106,534)
  $464,031  $688,591 

 

NOTE 4 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

 

Property and equipment at August 31, 20162019 and 20152018 consisted of the following:

 

 2016 2015  2019  2018 
Equipment $487,458  $460,626  $741,486  $741,984 
Computer equipment  125,385   123,235   411,632   285,834 
Furniture and fixtures  200,595   190,456   160,990   148,544 
Leasehold improvements  103,599   103,599   110,165   110,162 
  917,037   877,916   1,424,273   1,286,524 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization  660,656   464,406   1,083,128   951,300 
Total $256,381  $413,510  $341,145  $335,224 

 

Depreciation expense was $196,250$131,827, $139,202, and $211,454$151,444 for the years ended August 31, 20162019, 2018, and 2015,2017, respectively.

 

 

 F-14F-17 

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2016 and 2015

 

NOTE 5: CONTRACTS PAYABLE

 

TSRL

Pursuant to the termination and non-assertion agreement with TSRL (See note 2), the Company will pay TSRL $2,500,000 over a three-year period. The remaining payment of $1,000,000 will be made in April 2017.

CognigenDILIsym Acquisition Liability-Related PartyLiabilities:

On September 2, 2014,June 1, 2017, the Company acquired Cognigen Corporation (See note 13). As partDILIsym Services, Inc. The agreement provided for a working capital adjustment, an eighteen-month $1,000,000 holdback provision against certain representations and warrantees, and an Earn-out agreement of up to an additional $5,000,000 in Earn-out payments based on earnings over the considerationnext three years. The Earn-out liability has been recorded at an estimated fair value. Payments under the Company agreed that within three business days followingEarn-out liability will be due starting in FY 2018. In September 2018, $1,556,644 was paid out under the two year anniversary of July 23, 2014 (the date of the Merger Agreement) and subject to any offsets, the Company will pay the former shareholders of Cognigenfirst earn-out payment, a total of $1,854,404, comprised of $720,000 of cash and the issuance of 170,014 shares of stock. The former shareholders of Cognigen are currently employed by the consolidated Company, one of whom serves as the President of Simulations Plus, Inc. and Cognigen. In July 2016 the finalsecond earn-out payment was made in August 2019 in the amount of $1,682,329 it is estimated that a final payment of approximately $1,761,028 will be paid in August 2020.

As of August 31, 2019 and 2018 the shares were issued.following liabilities have been recorded:

  2019  2018 
Working Capital Liability $  $ 
Holdback Liability     1,000,000 
Earn-out Liability  1,761,028   4,890,940 
Sub Total $1,761,028  $5,890,940 
Less: Current Portion  1,761,028   2,556,644 
Long-Term $  $3,334,296 

 

NOTE 6 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Leases

We lease approximately 13,500 square feet of space in Lancaster, California. The original lease had a five-year term with two, three-year options to extend. The initial five-year term expired in February 2011, and we extended the lease to February 2, 2014. In June 2013, the lease was amended to extend the term to February 2, 2017. The amended lease also provides for an annual base rent increase of 3% per year and two, two-year options to extend. In May 2016 the companyCompany exercised the two, two-year options extending the term of the lease through February 2, 2021 at a fixed rate of $25,000 per month. The new extension agreement allowed the companyCompany with 90 daysdays’ notice to opt out of the remaining lease in the last two years of the term upon payment of a recapture payment equal to the 3% base payment increase that would have been due under the original agreement.

 

Our Buffalo subsidiary leases approximately 12,22512,623 square feet of space in Buffalo, New York. The initial five-year term expiresexpired in October 2018; the lease allows2018 and was renewed for a three year option to extendextending it to October 2021. The currentnew base rent is $15,638$16,147 per month.

In September 2017 DILIsym service signed a 3-year lease for approximately 1,900 rentable square feet of space in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. The initial three-year term expires in October 2020. The initial base rent is $3,975 per month with an annual 3% adjustment. Prior to this lease DILIsym was on a month-to-month rental.

 

Rent expense, including common area maintenance fees for the years ended August 31, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 was $491,800$584,000, $567,000 and $488,888,$509,600, respectively.

 

Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with remaining terms of one year or more at August 31, 20162019 were as follows:

 

Years Ending August 31,     
2017 $487,654
2018  498,654
2019  331,276
2020  300,000  566,000 
2021  126,786  327,000 
2022  49,000 
 $1,744,370 $942,000 

 

 

 F-15F-18 

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2016 and 2015

 

Employment AgreementAgreements

Effective September 1, 2014,In the normal course of business the Company has entered into a new Employment Agreementemployment agreements with Walter S. Woltosz to serve as Chief Executive Officercertain of the Company (the “Woltosz Employment Agreement”). The Woltosz Employment Agreement has a one-year term. Under the terms of the Woltosz Employment Agreement, Mr. Woltosz is required to devote a minimum of 60% of his productive time to the position of Chief Executive Officer of the Company. He will receive annualits key management personnel that may require compensation of $180,000, be eligible to receive up to 12,000 Company stock options under the 2007 Simulations Plus, Inc. Stock Option Plan, as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors, and shall be paid an annual performance bonus of up to 5% of the Company’s net income before taxes, not to exceed $36,000. A copy of the Woltosz Employment Agreement was filed as an attachment to the 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2014. On July 9, 2015, the Company renewed this employment agreement for another year at the same terms as the September 2014 agreement. A copy of the agreement was filed as an attachment to the 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 15, 2015. On August 8, 2016 the Company renewed this employment agreement for another year at the same terms as the September 2014 agreement. A copy of the agreement was filed as an attachment to the 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 2016.

On September 2, 2014, Thaddeus H. Grasela, Jr., Ph.D., was appointed President of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary Cognigen, and the Company and Cognigen have entered into an Employment Agreement with Dr. Grasela (the “Grasela Employment Agreement”) which has a three-year term. Pursuant to the Grasela Employment Agreement, Dr. Grasela will receive an annual base salary of $250,000, will be eligible to receive Company stock options under the 2007 Simulations Plus, Inc. Stock Option Plan, as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors, and will be eligible to receive an annual performance bonus in an amount not to exceed 10% of salary to be determined by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. On September, 2016 and 2015 the Compensation Committee awarded a $25,000 performance bonuses, this expense was accrued as an expense as of August 31, 2016 and 2015.payments upon termination.

 

License Agreement

The Company executedhas a royalty agreement with Accelrys, Inc. (the original agreement was entered into with Symyx Technologies in March 2010; Symyx Technologies later merged with Accelrys, Inc.)Dassault Systèmes Americas Corp. for access to their Metabolite Database for developing our Metabolite Module within ADMET Predictor™. The module was renamed the Metabolism Module when we released ADMET Predictor version 6 on April 19, 2012. Under this agreement, we pay a royalty of 25% of revenue derived from the sale of the Metabolism/Metabolite module to Accelrys. In 2014, Dassault Systemes of France acquired Accelrys and the company now operates under the name Biovia.module. Under this agreement for the year ended August 31, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 we incurred royalty expense of $119,620$195,828, $175,740 and $77,307,$139,551, respectively.

Dassault Systèmes has indicated they are no longer making access to this data base available for purchase, the Company is in the process of making arrangements to replace the database.

 

Litigation

Except as described below, weWe are not a party to any legal proceedings and are not aware of any pending legal proceedings of any kind.

In June 2014, the Company was served with a complaint in a civil action entitled Sherri Winslow v. Incredible Adventures, Inc., et al. (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC545789) alleging wrongful death and seeking unspecified damages arising out of a May 18, 2012 plane crash in the State of Nevada. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer owns the subject aircraft and is also a named defendant. The complaint alleged that the Company was the owner of the subject aircraft. The Company denies all material allegations against it, including that it owns or has ever owned any interest in the subject aircraft. On November 25, 2014, the plaintiff and the Company signed a stipulation of dismissal pursuant to which the plaintiff agreed to dismiss the Company without prejudice. If the plaintiff does not discover evidence during a nine month period to and including August 31, 2015 that justifies bringing the Company back into the litigation, the Company will prepare a dismissal with prejudice to be signed on behalf of the plaintiff. The Company did not receive any notification and is in the process of further discussion with the Plaintiffs’ regarding final dismissal with prejudice.

F-16

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2016 and 2015

  

NOTE 7 - SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

Dividend

The Company’s Board of Directors declared cash dividends during fiscal year 20162019, 2018 and 2015.2017. The details of dividend paid are in the following tables:

 

FY2015

Record Date Distribution Date Number of Shares Outstanding on
Record Date
 Dividend per
Share
  Total Amount 
11/7/2014 11/14/2014 16,841,114 $0.05  $842,056 
1/26/2015 2/2/2015 16,852,117 $0.05  $842,606 
5/11/2015 5/18/2015 16,875,117 $0.05  $843,754 
7/23/2015 7/30/2015 16,943,001 $0.05  $847,150 
Total         $3,375,566 

FY2017

Record Date Distribution Date Number of Shares
Outstanding on
Record Date
  Dividend per
Share
  Total Amount 
11/10/2016 11/17/2016  17,226,478  $0.05  $861,324 
1/30/2017 2/06/2017  17,233,758   0.05   861,688 
5/08/2017 5/15/2017  17,240,626   0.05   862,031 
7/28/2017 8/04/2017  17,268,920  $0.05   863,446 
Total           $3,448,489 

 

FY2016FY2018

Record Date Distribution Date Number of Shares
Outstanding on
Record Date
 Dividend per
Share
  Total Amount 
11/09/2015 11/16/2015 16,996,001 $0.05  $849,800 
1/29/2016 02/05/2016 17,018,001 $0.05  $850,900 
5/02/2016 5/09/2016 17,029,501 $0.05  $851,475 
8/11/2016 8/18/2016 17,221,978 $0.05  $861,099 
Total         $3,413,274 

 

Record Date Distribution Date Number of Shares
Outstanding on
Record Date
  Dividend per
Share
  Total Amount 
11/13/2017 11/20/2017  17,284,792  $0.06  $1,037,088 
1/26/2018 2/2/2018  17,317,752   0.06   1,039,065 
4/25/2018 5/2/2018  17,354,005   0.06   1,041,240 
7/26/2018 8/2/2018  17,405,775  $0.06   1,044,347 
Total           $4,161,740 

F-19

FY2019

Record Date Distribution Date Number of Shares
Outstanding on
Record Date
  Dividend per
Share
  Total Amount 
11/01/2018 11/08/2018  17,417,875  $0.06  $1,045,073 
1/25/2019 2/1/2019  17,481,450   0.06   1,048,887 
4/24/2019 5/1/2019  17,515,228   0.06   1,050,914 
7/25/2019 8/1/2019  17,536,454  $0.06   1,052,181 
Total           $4,197,055 

 

Although dividend distributions are currently expected to continue on a quarterly basis, the Company’s Board of Directors reserves the right to discontinue the dividend distribution any time.

  

Stock Option Plan

In September 1996,

On February 23, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted, and the Company’s shareholders approved, the 1996 Stock Option Plan (the "1996 Plan") under which a total of 1,000,000 shares of common stock had been reserved for issuance. The total number of shares that may be granted under the 1996 Plan was increased to 2,000,000 in March 1999, to 4,000,000 in February 2000, to 5,000,000 in December 2000 and to 6,000,000 in February 2005. All such increases were approved by the Company’s Board of Directors and the Company’s shareholders. The 1996 Plan terminated in September 2006 in accordance with its terms.

On February 23, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted and the Company’s shareholders approved, the 2007 Stock Option Plan (the “2007 Plan”) under which a total of 1,000,000 shares of common stock had been reserved for issuance. On February 25, 2014 the Company’s Board of Directors and the Company’s shareholders approved an increase ofadditional 1,000,000 shares increasing the total number of shares that may be granted under the 2007Option Plan to 2,000,000. This plan terminated in February 2017 by its term.

 

On December 23, 2016 the Board of Directors adopted, and on February 23, 2017 the shareholders approved, the 2017 Equity Incentive Stock Options (“ISOs”)Plan under which a total of 1,000,000 shares of common stock has been reserved for issuance. This plan will terminate in December 2026.

As of August 31, 2016,2019, employees and directors hold ISOsstock options to purchase in the aggregate 894,7501,163,259 shares of the Company’s common stock at exercise prices ranging from $1.00$6.75 to $9.82$34.23 per share.

 

The following table summarizes information about stock options:

Transactions in FY17 Number of Options  Weighted-Average Exercise Price
Per Share
  Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life 
Outstanding, August 31, 2016  947,500  $7.50   7.73 
Granted  434,916   10.18     
Exercised  (49,642)  3.56     
Cancelled/Forfeited  (83,648)  8.68     
Outstanding, August 31, 2017  1,249,126  $8.51   7.74 
Exercisable, August 31, 2017  401,485  $6.45   5.59 
Vested and Expected to Vest, August 31, 2017  1,144,405  $8.41   7.63 

Transactions in FY18 Number of
Options
  Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
  Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
 
          
Outstanding, August 31, 2017  1,249,126  $8.51   7.74 
Granted  52,000   22.36     
Exercised  (130,006)  5.97     
Canceled/Forfeited  (30,144)  9.10     
Expired  (6,000)  5.06     
Outstanding, August 31, 2018  1,134,976  $9.44   7.31 
Vested and Exercisable, August 31, 2018  483,696  $7.79   6.48 
Vested and Expected to Vest, August 31, 2018  1,069,807  $9.35   7.26 

 F-17F-20 

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2016 and 2015

 

Transactions in FY15
(ISOs)
 Number of
Options
  Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
  Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
 
          
Outstanding, August 31, 2014  798,500  $4.59   6.27 
Granted  37,000  $6.99     
Exercised  (95,384) $2.49     
Canceled/Forfeited  (119,116) $4.86     
Outstanding, August 31, 2015  621,000  $5.01   6.01 
Vested and Exercisable, August 31, 2015  265,700  $2.81   4.40 
Vested and Expected to Vest, August 31, 2015  576,952  $4.87   6.32 

Transactions in FY16
(ISOs)
 Number of
Options
  Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
  Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
 
          
Outstanding, August 31, 2015  621,000  $5.01   6.01 
Granted  412,100  $9.71     
Exercised  (100,863) $1.45     
Canceled/Forfeited  (27,487) $7.66     
Expired  (10,000) $1.13     
Outstanding, August 31, 2016  894,750  $7.54   7.72 
Vested and Exercisable, August 31, 2016  253,380  $4.85   5.26 
Vested and Expected to Vest, August 31, 2016  812,458  $7.40   7.58 

Non-Qualified Stock Options (“NQSOs”)

As of August 31, 2016, the outside members of the Company’s Board of Directors hold NQSOs to purchase in the aggregate 52,750 shares of the Company’s common stock at exercise prices ranging from $1.78 to $8.62 per share.

Transactions in FY15
(NQSOs)
 Number of
Options
  Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
  Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
 
Outstanding, August 31, 2014  56,600  $4.82   7.96 
Granted  13,750  $6.75     
Exercised  (6,503) $3.28     
Cancelled/Forfeited  (14,497) $4.97     
Outstanding, August 31, 2015  49,350  $5.52   7.75 
Exercisable, August 31, 2015  27,200  $4.70   6.31 

F-18

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2016 and 2015

Transactions in FY16
(NQSOs)
 Number of Options  Weighted-Average Exercise Price
Per Share
  Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life 
Outstanding, August 31, 2015  49,350  $5.52   7.75 
Granted  15,000  $8.62     
Exercised  (11,600) $3.33     
Cancelled/Forfeited  (0) $     
Outstanding, August 31, 2016  52,750  $6.88   8.07 
Exercisable, August 31, 2016  26,500  $5.95   6.70 

The fair value of the options, including both ISOs and NQSOs, granted during fiscal year 2016 is estimated at $1,189,730. The fair value of these options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 2.32%, pre-vest forfeiture rate of 6.31%, expected volatility of 34.22%, risk-free interest rate of 1.42%, and expected life of 6.80 years. The total fair value of non-vested stock options as of August 31, 2016 was $1,366,269 and is amortizable over a weighted average period of 7.58 years.

The fair value of the options, including both ISOs and NQSOs, granted during fiscal year 2015 was estimated at $113,435. The fair value of these options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 3.03%, pre-vest forfeiture rate of 6.20%, expected volatility of 47.13%, risk-free interest rate of 2.09%, and expected life of 6.89 years.

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which do not have vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Because our stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its stock options.

Transactions in FY19 Number of
Options
  Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
  Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
 
          
Outstanding, August 31, 2018  1,134,976  $9.44   7.31 
Granted  263,500   22.78     
Exercised  (166,703)  7.15     
Canceled/Forfeited  (68,514)  12.17     
Expired            
Outstanding, August 31, 2019  1,163,259  $12.63   7.13 
Vested and Exercisable, August 31, 2019  515,394  $8.57   6.09 
Vested and Expected to Vest, August 31, 2019  1,101,800  $12.39   7.07 

 

Intrinsic Value of options outstanding and options exercisable

 

  Intrinsic Value
of Options
Outstanding
  Intrinsic
Value of
Options
Exercisable
  Intrinsic
Value of
Options
Exercised
 
FY15 $1,182,797  $1,109,489  $396,485 
FY16 $1,500,659  $1,025,718  $853,423 
  Intrinsic Value
of Options
Outstanding
  Intrinsic
Value of
Options
Exercisable
  Intrinsic
Value of
Options
Exercised
 
FY17 $7,479,068  $3,232,356  $479,713 
FY18 $13,064,884  $6,315,086  $1,495,313 
FY19 $27,312,742  $14,194,724  $3,224,454 

 

The weighted-average remaining contractual life of options outstanding issued under the 19962007 and 20072017 Plan was 7.747.13 years at August 31, 2016.2019. The exercise prices for the options outstanding at August 31, 20162019 ranged from $1.00$6.75 to $9.82$34.23 per share, and the information relating to these options is as follows:

 

Exercise Price Awards Outstanding Awards Exercisable
Low High Quantity Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life Weighted Average Exercise Price Quantity Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life Weighted Average Exercise Price
$1.00 $ 1.50 67,000 3.0 years $ 1.00 67,000 3.0 years $1.03
$1.51 $ 3.00      –-
$3.01 $ 4.50 20,000 1.9 years $ 3.16 20,000 1.9 years $3.16
$4.51 $ 6.00 74,000 2.7 years $ 5.48 44,000 2.9 years $5.38
$6.01 $ 7.50 367,200 8.0 years $ 6.85 148,880 7.9 years $6.85
$7.51 $ 9.00 15,000 10.0 years $ 8.62 0    
$9.01 $ 9.82 404,300 9.5 years $ 9.71 0    
    947,500     279,880    

 

Exercise Price  Awards Outstanding  Awards Exercisable 
Low  High  Quantity  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Quantity  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
$6.75  $8.00   230,133   5.0 years  $6.85   228,133   5.0 years  $6.85 
$8.01  $16.00   636,976   7.0 years  $9.96   287,261   7.0 years  $9.93 
$16.01  $24.00   248,150   8.8 years  $20.66           
$24.01  $34.23   48,000   9.9 years  $34.23           
         1,163,259   7.1 years  $12.63   515,394   6.1 years  $8.57 

 

F-19

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2016 and 2015

NOTE 8 - INCOME TAXES

 

We utilize FASB ASC 740-10,“Income Taxes” which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns.

 

Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The provision for income taxes represents the tax payable for the period and the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.

 

F-21

The components of the income tax provision for fiscal year 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 were as follows:

 

 2016 2015  2019  2018  2017 
Current                 
Federal $2,118,229  $1,482,798  $1,794,596  $2,370,955  $2,385,660 
State  171,840   236,152   426,364   460,619   217,281 
Foreign  19,428   75,099   51,285   104,377   28,103 
  2,309,497   1,794,049   2,272,245   2,935,951   2,631,044 
Deferred                    
Federal  22,936   (15,036)  (140,730)  (1,698,201)  (612,629 
State  (46,177)  70,955   (158,368)  (33,620   434,255 
  (23,241)  55,919   (299,098)  (1,731,821)  (178,374)
                    
Total $2,286,256  $1,849,968  $1,973,147  $1,204,130  $2,452,670 

  

A reconciliation of the expected income tax (benefit) computed using the federal statutory income tax rate to the Company's effective income tax rate is as follows for fiscal year 20162019, 2018 and 2015:2017:

 

  2016  2015 
Income tax computed at federal statutory tax rate  34.0%  34.0%
State taxes, net of federal benefit  3.4   5.0 
Meals & Entertainment  0.1   0.1 
Stock Based Compensation  1.3   0.3 
Other permanent differences  (0.6)  (0.5)
Research and development credit  (6.3)  (6.9)
Change in prior year estimated taxes  (0.3)  0.5 
Total  31.6%  32.5%

F-20

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2016 and 2015

  2019  2018  2017 
Income tax computed at federal statutory tax rate  21.0%   25.4%   34.0% 
State taxes, net of federal benefit  4.1      4.0      3.5    
Meals & entertainment  0.1      0.0      0.0    
Stock based compensation  (2.6)     0.5      0.0    
Other permanent differences  (0.7)     1.2      (0.5)   
Research and development credit  (2.3)     (2.6)     (3.6)   
Domestic production activities  –      (1.8)     (2.3)   
Change in deferred income taxes due to statutory rate changes  –      (14.8)     –    
Change in prior year estimated taxes  (0.9)     (0.0)     (1.3)   
Total  18.7%   11.9%   29.8% 

 

Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities for income taxes for the fiscal years ended August 31, 20162019 and 20152018 are as follows:

 

 2016 2015  2019  2018 
Deferred tax assets                
Accrued payroll and other expenses $108,769  $97,625  $236,455  $187,220 
Deferred revenue  71,009   43,703   55,038   34,955 
Capitalized merger costs  292,693   299,965   361,103   365,801 
Intellectual property  21,205   24,221   9,301   11,066 
Research and development credit  54,427   90,365 
State taxes  58,426   78,089   89,537   96,730 
State Tax Deferred  160,391   175,044 
State tax deferred  146,815   174,800 
Total deferred tax assets  766,920   809,012   898,249   870,572 
Less: Valuation allowance            
  766,920   809,012   898,249   870,572 
Deferred tax liabilities                
Property and equipment  (93,900)  (159,980)  (61,991)  (57,636)
State Tax Deferred  (9,491)  (8,445)
Intellectual Property  (2,004,451)  (2,053,220)
State tax deferred  (16,471)  (10,701)
Intellectual property  (2,217,234)  (2,593,292)
Capitalized computer software development costs  (1,615,284)  (1,566,815)  (1,334,169)  (1,404,082)
Total deferred tax liabilities  (3,723,126)  (3,788,460)  (3,629,865)  (4,065,711)
                
Net deferred tax liabilities $(2,956,206) $(2,979,447) $(2,731,616) $(3,195,139)

F-22

 

We follow guidance issued by the FASB with regard to our accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements. Such guidance prescribes a recognition threshold of more likely than not and a measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In making this assessment, a company must determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, based solely on the technical merits of the position and must assume that the tax position will be examined by taxing authorities. Our policy is to include interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. Interest and penalties totaled $$2,531, -0-, and $-0- for fiscal year 20162019, 2018, and 2015,2017, respectively. We file income tax returns with the IRS and various state jurisdictions and India. Our federal income tax returns for fiscal year 20122015 thru 2013 and 20152018 are open for audit, and our state tax returns for fiscal year 20112013 through 20152018 remain open for audit. In addition, our California tax return for the fiscal year 2007 and fiscal year 2008 remains open with regard to R&D tax credits as a result of a previous audit for which we received a letter from the California Franchise Tax Board stating that an audit will not be conducted for those years at this time; however it may be subject to future audit. In 2015 the Company was informed that the IRS was auditing the Company’s tax return for 2014. This audit was completed during FY2016; there were no changes as a result of the audit.

  

Our review of prior year tax positions using the criteria and provisions presented in guidance issued by FASB did not result in a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

 

NOTE 9 – CONCENTRATIONS AND UNCERTAINTIES

 

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents and trade accounts receivable. The Company holds cash and cash equivalents at banks located in California, with balances that often exceed FDIC insured limits. Historically, the Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents. However, considering the current banking environment, the Company is investigating alternative ways to minimize its exposure to such risks. While the Company may be exposed to credit losses due to the nonperformance of its counterparties, the Company does not expect the settlement of these transactions to have a material effect on its results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

F-21

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company maintains cash at financial institutions that may, at times, exceed federally insured limits. At August 31, 20162019 the Company had cash and 2015cash equivalents exceeding insured limits by $10,223,000.

 

Revenue concentration shows that international sales accounted for 34%, 39% and 38% of net sales for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 37%2017, respectively. Three customers accounted for 8%, 8% (a dealer account in Japan representing various customers), and 7% of net sales for fiscal year 20162019. Four customers accounted for 9% (a dealer account in Japan representing various customers), 7%, 6% and 2015, respectively.5% of net sales for fiscal year 2018. Three customers accounted for 10%7% (a dealer account in Japan representing various customers), 7% and 6%5% of net sales for fiscal year 2016. Three customers accounted for2017.

FY19 accounts receivable concentrations show that one customer comprised 10%, of accounts receivable as of August 31, 2019. FY18 accounts receivable concentrations show that one customer comprised 17% (a dealer account in Japan representing various customers), 8% and 6% of net sales for fiscal year 2015.

Accounts receivable concentration shows that three customers comprised 16% (a dealer account in Japan representing various customers), 10%, and 10% of accounts receivable atas of August 31, 2016, and three customers comprised 12% (a dealer account in Asia representing various customer), 11% (a dealer account in Japan representing various customers), and 11% of accounts receivable at August 31, 2015.2018.

 

We operate in the computer software industry, which is highly competitive and changes rapidly. Our operating results could be significantly affected by our ability to develop new products and find new distribution channels for new and existing products.

 

The majority of our customers are in the pharmaceutical industry. During economic downturns, we have seen consolidations in the pharmaceutical industry. Although we have not seen any significant reduction in total revenues to date, our growth rate could be effectedaffected by consolidation and downsizing in the pharmaceutical industry.

 

NOTE 10:10 – SEGMENT ANDGeographic Reporting

 

We account for segments and geographic revenues in accordance with guidance issued by the FASB. Our reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services.

 

Results for each segment and consolidated results are as follows years ended August 31, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 (in thousands, because of rounding, numbers may not foot):

 

Year ended August 31, 2015
  Simulations Plus, Inc.  Cognigen Corporation  Eliminations  Total 
Net Revenues $13,086  $5,228      $18,314 
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes $4,816  $1,041      $5,857 
Total assets $25,549  $9,033  $(7,238) $27,344 
Capital expenditures $23  $14      $37 
Capitalized software costs $1,019  $151      $1,170 
Depreciation and Amortization $1,633  $357      $1,990 

Year ended August 31, 2016
  Simulations Plus, Inc.  Cognigen Corporation  Eliminations  Total 
Net Revenues $14,417   5,554      $19,972 
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes $6,330  $901      $7,231 
Total assets $26,306  $8,975  $(7,238) $28,043 
Capital expenditures $6  $32      $38 
Capitalized software costs $1,017  $178      $1,195 
Depreciation and Amortization $1,556  $375      $1,931 

 

 

 F-22F-23 

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2016 and 2015

 

Year ended August 31, 2019
  Simulations Plus, Inc.  Cognigen Corporation  DILIsym  Eliminations  Total 
Net Revenues $19,585  $9,321  $5,065      $33,970 
Income from operations before income taxes $7,752  $1,481  $1,416      $10,648 
Total assets $38,535  $11,196  $13,168  $(17,702) $45,197 
Goodwill $0  $4,789  $5,598      $10,387 
Capital expenditures $39  $79  $20      $138��
Capitalized software costs $1,482  $114  $172      $1,768 
Depreciation and Amortization $1,806  $364  $580      $2,750 

Year ended August 31, 2018
  Simulations Plus, Inc.  Cognigen Corporation  DILIsym  Eliminations  Total 
Net Revenues $17,553  $7,857  $4,257      $29,667 
Income from operations before income taxes $7,533  $1,902  $863      $10,298 
Total assets $38,000  $8,733  $14,248  $(17,702) $43,279 
Goodwill $0  $4,789  $5,598      $10,387 
Capital expenditures $65  $100  $18      $183 
Capitalized software costs $1,365  $625  $155      $2,145 
Depreciation and Amortization $1,748  $401  $572      $2,721 

Year ended August 31, 2017
  Simulations Plus, Inc.  Cognigen Corporation  DILIsym  Eliminations  Total 
Net Revenues $15,600  $7,300  $1,238      $24,138 
Income from operations before income taxes $6,194  $1,750  $320      $8,264 
Total assets $33,056  $9,363  $13,794  $(17,702) $38,512 
Goodwill $0  $4,789  $5,598      $10,387 
Capital expenditures $48  $96  $1,384      $1,528 
Capitalized software costs $1,133  $219  $24      $1,376 
Depreciation and Amortization $1618  $374  $135      $2,127 

 

In addition, the Company allocates revenues to geographic areas based on the locations of its customers. Geographical revenues for the years ended August 31, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 were as follows (in thousands, because of rounding, numbers may not foot):

 

Year ended August 31, 20152019

  North America  Europe  Asia  South America  Total 
                
Simulations Plus, Inc. $6,261  $3,629  $3,153  $43  $13,086 
Cognigen Corporation  5,228            5,228 
Total $11,489  $3,629  $3,153  $43  $18,314 

  North America  Europe  Asia  South America  Total 
                
Simulations Plus, Inc. $9,327  $5,144  $5,060  $54  $19,585 
Cognigen Corporation  9,321            9,321 
DILIsym Services, Inc.  3,875   685   505      5,065 
Total $22,523  $5,829  $5,565  $54  $33,971 

F-24

 

Year ended August 31, 20162018

  North America  Europe  Asia  South America  Total 
                
Simulations Plus, Inc. $6,830  $4,022  $3,564  $2  $14,418 
Cognigen Corporation  5,554            5,554 
Total $12,384  $4,022  $3,564  $2  $19,972 

  North America  Europe  Asia  South America  Total 
                
Simulations Plus, Inc. $7,826  $4,964  $4,733  $30  $17,553 
Cognigen Corporation  7,857            7,857 
DILIsym Services, Inc.  3,163   312   782      4,257 
Total $18,846  $5,276  $5,515  $30  $29,667 

Year ended August 31, 2017

  North America  Europe  Asia  South America  Total 
                
Simulations Plus, Inc. $7,846  $3,826  $3,926  $1  $15,600 
Cognigen Corporation  7,300            7,300 
DILIsym Services, Inc.*  851   151   236      1,238 
Total $15,997  $3,977  $4,162  $1  $24,138 

*DILIsym was acquired on June 1, 2017.

 

NOTE 11 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

During fiscal year 2016 and 2015, included in bonus expensesOn June 1, 2017 the Company acquired DILIsym Service, Inc. As part of that agreement the Company paid $1,704,000 to officers was $121,000,former shareholders of which $60,000 was accrued bonus representing 5%DILIsym Services, Inc. who are currently employees of the Company’s net income before bonuses and taxes, not exceeding $60,000, paid to the Corporate Secretary, Virginia Woltosz, as an annual bonusConsolidated Company. In addition, as part of the terms of the original sale of Words+ toacquisition agreement the Company in 1996. In addition, $36,000 was accrued under the employment agreement with Walter Woltosz, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and another $25,000 was expensed as a fiscal year 2014 performance bonus for Thaddeus Grasela the Company’s President. These bonuses were accrued asowes approximately $2,260,000 of acquisition liabilities at August 31, 2016 and 2015, and paid in the month following the fiscal close.

On September 2, 2014 the Company acquired Cognigen Corporation. The Company incurred a liability of $1,854,404 due2018 to the former shareholders of Cognigen Corporation who are currentlystill employees and shareholders of the Consolidated Company. (See note 5). This liability was settledOne of the former shareholders of DILIsym is currently a director of Simulations Plus, under the agreement he received approximately, $29,000 and could receive up to approximately $30,000 in July 2016 with a cash paymentfuture earn-out payments. In September 2018, subsequent to year end under terms of $720,000the agreement the Company made payments in the amount of approximately $587,000 and $10,000, respectively to the employees and the balancecurrent director. In Fiscal year 2019, under terms of $1,134,404 stock issuance.the agreement the Company made payments in the amount of approximately $1,599,534 and $27,312, respectively to the employees and the current director.

 

NOTE 12 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN

 

We maintain a 401(k) Plan for eligible employees. We make matching contributions equal to 100% of the employee’s elective deferral, not to exceed 4% of the total employee compensation. We can also elect to make a profit-sharing contribution. We contributed $219,756$404,684, $326,762 and $237,300$251,899 for fiscal year 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively.

 

NOTE 13 - ACQUISITION/MERGER WITH COGNIGEN CORPORATIONSUBSIDIARIES

DILIsym Services, Inc.

 

On July 23, 2014,May 1, 2017, the Company entered into ana Stock Purchase Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger“Stock Agreement”) with Cognigen CorporationDILIsym Services, Inc. (“Cognigen”DILIsym”). On September 2, 2014,June 1, 2016, the Company consummated the acquisition of all outstanding equity interests of CognigenDILIsym pursuant to the terms of the MergerStock Agreement, with Cognigen merging with and intoDILIsym becoming a newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. We believe the combination of Simulations Plus and CognigenDILIsym provides substantial future potential based on the complementary strengths of each of the companies.

 

 

 F-23F-25 

SIMULATIONS PLUS, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

August 31, 2016 and 2015

 

Under the terms of the MergerStock Agreement, as described below, the Company will pay the former shareholders of CognigenDILIsym total consideration of $7,000,000, consisting of $2,800,000 of cash and $4,200,000 worth of newly issued, unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock.approximately $10,463,000.

 

On September 2, 2014,June 1, 2017, the Company paid the former shareholders of CognigenDILIsym a total of $5,200,000, comprised$4,515,982, which included a $4,000,000 initial payment and a preliminary working capital payment of cash$515,982. An additional working capital adjustment of $247,328 was due under the agreement and was paid subsequent in FY 2018. In December 2018, the Company paid the former shareholders of DILIsym a total of $1,000,000 under a holdback provision.

The agreement calls for earn-out payments up to an additional $5,000,000 based on a formula of pre-tax earnings over a three years period. The Earn-out liability has been recorded at fair value. Payments made under the earn-out are as follows: In September 2018, $1,556,644 was paid out under the first earn-out payment, a second earn-out payment was made in August 2019 in the amount of $2,080,000$1,682,329, and the issuance of 491,159 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $3,120,000 (under the terms of the Merger Agreementit is estimated that a pricefinal payment of approximately $6.35 dollars per share was used based upon the volume-weighted average closing price of the Company’s shares of common stock for the 30-consecutive-trading-day period ending two trading days prior to September 2, 2014). The actual stock price at September 2, 2014 was $6.67, so the total value of the stock issued was approximately $3,277,000. The Merger Agreement provides for a two-year market standoff period$1,761,000 will be paid in which the newly issued shares may not be sold by the recipients thereof.

Within three business days following the two-year anniversary of July 23, 2014 (the date of the Merger Agreement) and subject to any offsets, the Company will pay the former shareholders of Cognigen a total of $1,800,000, comprised of $720,000 of cash and the issuance of 170,014 shares of stock valued at $1,080,000 under the formula described above.

The Merger Agreement provided for a targeted working capital adjustment to be made 120 days after the closing date.August 2020.

 

Under the acquisition method of accounting, the total estimated purchase price is allocated to Cognigen’sDILIsym’s tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based on their estimated fair values at the date of the completion of the acquisition (September 2, 2014)(June 1, 2017). The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the purchase price for Cognigen:DILIsym:

 

Assets acquired, including accounts receivable of $934,000 and estimated Contracts receivable of $398,000 $1,524,389 
Fixed assets acquired  458,351 
Estimated value of software acquired  200,000 
Estimated value of Intangibles acquired (Customer Lists, trade name etc.)  1,600,000 
Working Capital Adjustment  (26,707)
Current Liabilities assumed  (644,499)
Goodwill  4,789,248 
Estimated Deferred income taxes  (662,500)
     
Total Consideration $7,238,282 
Assets acquired, including accounts receivable of $255,000 and estimated Contracts receivable of $153,000 $2,283,110 
Developed technologies acquired  2,850,000 
Estimated value of intangibles acquired (Customer Lists, trade name etc.)  2,840,000 
Current liabilities assumed  (911,049)
Goodwill  5,597,950 
Estimated deferred income taxes  (2,212,160)
     
Total Consideration $10,463,310 

 

Goodwill has been provided in the transaction based on estimates of future earnings of this subsidiary including anticipated synergies associated with the positioning of the combined company as a leader in model-based drug development. Based on the structure of the transaction, the Company does not anticipate benefiting from any tax deductions in future periods for recognized goodwill.

PROFORMA INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

Consolidated supplemental Pro Forma information

The following consolidated supplemental pro forma information assumes that the acquisition of DILIsym took place on September 1, 2015 for the income statements for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017, and 2016. These amounts (in thousands) have been calculated after applying the Company’s accounting policies and adjusting the results of DILIsym to reflect the same expenses in the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017 that were incurred in the fiscal year ended August 31, 2016. The adjustments include costs of acquisition of $620,000, and the amortization of intangibles and other technologies acquired during the merger assuming the fair value adjustments applied on September 1, 2015, together with consequential tax effects.

  (Actual)  (Actual)  (Pro forma)* 
  2019  2018  2017 
Net Sales $33,970  $29,667  $27,184 
Net Income $8,583  $8,935  $6,325 

*Includes 3 months actual results for the period of June 1, 2017 to August 31, 2017

F-26

NOTE 14. UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA

The following table presents selected unaudited quarterly financial data for each full quarterly period of the years ended August 31, 2019 and 2018:

  First  Second  Third  Fourth 
Year ended August 31, 2019 Quarter  Quarter  Quarter  Quarter 
Revenues $7,536  $8,472  $9,937  $8,026 
Gross Profit $5,336  $6,264  $7,613  $5,735 
Net Income $1,536  $2,099  $2,889  $2,059 
Earnings per share, Basic $0.09  $0.12  $0.16  $0.12 
Earnings per share, Diluted $0.09  $0.12  $0.16  $0.11 

(in 1,000’s except for per share data)

  First  Second  Third  Fourth 
Year ended August 31, 2018 Quarter  Quarter  Quarter  Quarter 
Revenues $7,069  $7,357  $8,553  $6,688 
Gross Profit $5,333  $5,241  $6,530  $4,568 
Net Income $1,716  $3,475  $2,406  $1,338 
Earnings per share, Basic $0.10  $0.20  $0.14  $0.08 
Earnings per share, Diluted $0.10  $0.19  $0.13  $0.07 

 

 

NOTE 1415 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

Dividend Declared

 

On October 31, 2016,14, 2019, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05$0.06 per share to our shareholders. The dividend will bewas distributed on Thursday,Friday, November 17, 2016,1, 2019, for shareholders of record as of Thursday, November 10, 2016.Friday, October 25, 2019.

 

 

 

 F-24F-27