Table of Contents





UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K


x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
☒ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20182020


— OR —


o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __ to __


Commission File Number 001-38086


Vistra Energy Corp.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware36-4833255
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
6555 Sierra DriveIrving,Texas75039(214)812-4600
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Delaware36-4833255
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
6555 Sierra Drive, Irving, Texas 75039(214) 812-4600
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each ClassTrading Symbol(s)Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common stock, par value $0.01 per shareVSTNew York Stock Exchange
Warrants exercisable for common stock at an exercise price of $35 per 0.652 shareVST.WS.ANew York Stock Exchange
7.00% tangible equity unitsNew York Stock Exchange


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in ruleRule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o☒ No x☐


Indicated by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the act.Act. Yes o☐ No x☒


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x☒ No o☐


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes x☒ No o☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company"company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer xAccelerated filer oNon-Accelerated filer oSmaller reporting company oEmerging growth company o
Large accelerated filer☒Accelerated filer☐Non-accelerated filer☐Smaller reporting company☐Emerging growth company☐


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o☐



Table of Contents

As of June 30, 2018, the aggregate market value of the Vistra Energy Corp. common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $8,592,448,694 based on the closing sale price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.

Indicate by check mark ifwhether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒

Table of Contents

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o☐ No x☒


As of June 30, 2020, the aggregate market value of the Vistra Corp. common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $9,084,469,142 based on the closing sale price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.

As of February 25, 2019,23, 2021, there were 485,894,408483,716,012 shares of common stock, par value $0.01, outstanding of Vistra Energy Corp.


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE


Portions of the proxy statement for the registrant's 20192021 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated in Part III of this Annual Reportannual report on Form 10‑K.
10-K.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
ii
PART I.
1
1720
3646
3746
3948
3948
PART II.
4049
4250
4351
7982
8588
181173
181173
182174
PART III.
183175
183175
183175
183175
183175
PART IV.
Item 15.
184176
193189
194190


Vistra Energy Corp.'s (Vistra Energy)(Vistra) annual reports, quarterly reports, current reports and any amendments to those reports are made available to the public, free of charge, on the Vistra Energy website at http://www.vistraenergy.comwww.vistracorp.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Additionally, Vistra Energy posts important information, including press releases, investor presentations, sustainability reports, and notices of upcoming events on its website and utilizes its website as a channel of distribution to reach public investors and as a means of disclosing material non-public information for complying with disclosure obligations under Regulation FD. Investors may be notified of posting to the website by signing up for email alerts and RSS feeds on the "Investor Relations" page of Vistra Energy'sVistra's website. The information on Vistra Energy'sVistra's website shall not be deemed a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this annual report on Form 10-K. The representations and warranties contained in any agreement that we have filed as an exhibit to this annual report on Form 10-K, or that we have or may publicly file in the future, may contain representations and warranties that may (i) be made by and to the parties thereto at specific dates, (ii) be subject to exceptions and qualifications contained in separate disclosure schedules, (iii) represent the parties' risk allocation in the particular transaction, or (iv) be qualified by materiality standards that differ from what may be viewed as material for securities law purposes.


This annual report on Form 10-K and other Securities and Exchange Commission filings of Vistra Energy and its subsidiaries occasionally make references to Vistra Energy (or "we," "our," "us" or "the Company"), Luminant, TXU Energy, Ambit, Value Based Brands, LLC, Dynegy Energy Services, or Homefield Energy, TriEagle Energy, Public Power or U.S. Gas & Electric, when describing actions, rights or obligations of their respective subsidiaries. These references reflect the fact that the subsidiaries are consolidated with, or otherwise reflected in, their respective parent company'sthe Vistra financial statements for financial reporting purposes. However, these references should not be interpreted to imply that the parent company is actually undertaking the action or has the rights or obligations of the relevant subsidiary company or vice versa.

i
Table of Contents

GLOSSARY


When the following terms and abbreviations appear in the text of this report, they have the meanings indicated below.
20172019 Form 10-K
Vistra Energy'sVistra's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, filed with the SEC on February 26, 2018, except for Part II, Items 7 and 8, which were amended in Vistra
Energy's current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 15, 2018

28, 2020
AROAmbit or Ambit EnergyAmbit Holdings, LLC, and/or its subsidiaries (d/b/a Ambit), depending on context
AROasset retirement and mining reclamation obligation
CAAClean Air Act
CAISOThe California Independent System Operator
CCGTCARES ActCoronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act
CCGTcombined cycle gas turbine
CFTCU.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Chapter 11 CasesCases in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (Bankruptcy Court) concerning voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankruptcy Code) filed on April 29, 2014 (Petition Date) by the Debtors. On the Effective Date, the TCEH Debtors (together with the Contributed EFH Debtors) emerged from the Chapter 11 Cases.
CMEChicago Mercantile Exchange
CO2
carbon dioxide
Contributed EFH Debtorscertain EFH Debtors that became subsidiaries of Vistra Energy on the Effective Date
CTcombustion turbine
DIP FacilityTCEH's $3.375 billion debtor-in-possession financing facility, which was repaid in August 2016 (see Note 14 to the Financial Statements)
DIP Roll FacilitiesTCEH's $4.250 billion debtor-in-possession and exit financing facilities, which were converted to the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities on the Effective Date (see Note 14 to the Financial Statements)
DebtorsEFHFuture Holdings Corp. (EFH Corp.) and the majority of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including EFIH, EFCHEnergy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company LLC and TCEH but excluding the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities. Prior toElectric Delivery Holdings Company LLC and its direct and indirect subsidiaries (Debtors). On the Effective Date, also includedsubsidiaries of TCEH that were Debtors in the TCEHChapter 11 Cases (TCEH Debtors), along with certain other Debtors andthat became subsidiaries of Vistra on that date (Contributed EFH Debtors) emerged from the Contributed EFH Debtors.Chapter 11 Cases.
DynegyCMEChicago Mercantile Exchange
CO2
carbon dioxide
CPUCCalifornia Public Utilities Commission
CriusCrius Energy Trust and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context
CTcombustion turbine
DynegyDynegy Inc., and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context
Dynegy Energy ServicesDynegy Energy Services, LLC and Dynegy Energy Services (East), LLC (d/(each d/b/a Dynegy, Better Buy Energy, Brighten Energy, Honor Energy and BrightenTrue Fit Energy), indirect, wholly owned subsidiaries of Vistra, Energy, that are REPs in certain areas of MISO and PJM, respectively, and are engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers.
EBITDAearnings (net income) before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization
EFCHEnergy Future Competitive Holdings Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of EFH Corp. and, prior to the Effective Date the indirect parent of the TCEH Debtors, depending on context
Effective DateOctober 3, 2016, the date the TCEH Debtors and the Contributed EFH Debtors completed their reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code and emerged from the Chapter 11 Cases
EFH Corp.EmergenceEnergy Future Holdings Corp. and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context, whose major subsidiaries include Oncor and, prior to the Effective Date, included the TCEH Debtors and the Contributed EFH Debtors
EFH DebtorsEFH Corp. and its subsidiaries that are Debtors in the Chapter 11 Cases, including EFIH and EFIH Finance Inc., but excluding the TCEH Debtors and the Contributed EFH Debtors
EFIHEnergy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of EFH Corp. and the direct parent of Oncor Holdings
Emergenceemergence of the TCEH Debtors and the Contributed EFH Debtors from the Chapter 11 Cases as subsidiaries of a newly formed company, Vistra, Energy, on the Effective Date
EPAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
ERCOTElectric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc.
ESSenergy storage system
Exchange ActSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
ERCOTElectric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc.
Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreements
An agreement, executed in May 2012 but effective as of January 2010 to which prior to the Effective Date, EFH Corp. and certain of its subsidiaries (including EFCH, EFIH and TCEH, but not including Oncor Holdings and Oncor) were parties. The Agreement was rejected by the TCEH Debtors and the Contributed EFH Debtors on the Effective Date (see Note 9 to the Financial Statements).



ii
Table of Contents

FERC
FERCU.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
FitchFitch Ratings Inc. (a credit rating agency)
GAAPFTCFederal Trade Commission
GAAPgenerally accepted accounting principles
GHGgreenhouse gas
GWhgigawatt-hours
Homefield EnergyIllinois Power Marketing Company (d/b/a Homefield Energy), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra, Energy, a REP in certain areas of MISO that is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to municipal customers
ICEIntercontinentalExchangeIntercontinental Exchange
IRSIRCInternal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
ii
Table of Contents
IRSU.S. Internal Revenue Service
ISOindependent system operator
ISO-NEIndependent System OperatorISO New England Inc.
kWkilowatt
LIBORLondon Interbank Offered Rate, an interest rate at which banks can borrow funds, in marketable size, from other banks in the London interbank market
loaddemand for electricity
LSTCLTSAliabilities subject to compromise
LTSAlong termlong-term service agreements for plant maintenance
Luminantsubsidiaries of Vistra Energy engaged in competitive market activities consisting of electricity generation and wholesale energy sales and purchases as well as commodity risk management
market heat rateHeat rate is a measure of the efficiency of converting a fuel source to electricity. Market heat rate is the implied relationship between wholesale electricity prices and natural gas prices and is calculated by dividing the wholesale market price of electricity, which is based on the price offer of the marginal supplier (generally natural gas plants), by the market price of natural gas.
Mergerthe merger of Dynegy with and into Vistra, Energy, with Vistra Energy as the surviving corporation
Merger Agreementthe Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 29, 2017, by and between Vistra Energy and Dynegy as it may be amended or modified from time to time
Merger DateApril 9, 2018, the date Vistra Energy and Dynegy completed the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement
MISOMidcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
MMBtumillion British thermal units
Moody'sMoody's Investors Service, Inc. (a credit rating agency)
MSHAU.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration
MWmegawatts
MWhmegawatt-hours
NERCNELPNortheast Energy, LP, a joint venture between Dynegy Northeast Generation GP, Inc. and Dynegy Northeast Associates LP, Inc., both indirect subsidiaries of Vistra, and certain subsidiaries of NextEra Energy, Inc. Prior to the NELP Transaction, NELP indirectly owned Bellingham NEA facility and the Sayreville facility.
NELP Transactiona transaction among Dynegy Northeast Generation GP, Inc., Dynegy Northeast Associates LP, Inc. and certain subsidiaries of NextEra Energy, Inc. wherein the indirect subsidiaries of Vistra redeemed their ownership interest in NELP partnership in exchange for 100% ownership interest in NJEA, the entity which owns the Sayreville facility
NERCNorth American Electric Reliability Corporation
NJEANorth Jersey Energy Associates, A Limited Partnership
NOX
nitrogen oxide
NRCU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
NYMEXNYISONew York Independent System Operator, Inc.
NYMEXthe New York Mercantile Exchange, a commodity derivatives exchange
NYSENew York Stock Exchange
NYISOOncorNew York Independent System Operator
OncorOncor Electric Delivery Company LLC, a direct, majority-owned subsidiary of Oncor Holdings and formerly an indirect subsidiary of EFH Corp., that is engaged in regulated electricity transmission and distribution activities
Oncor HoldingsOPEBOncor Electric Delivery Holdings Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of EFIH and the direct majority owner of Oncor, and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context
Oncor Ring-Fenced EntitiesOncor Holdings and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including Oncor
OPEBpostretirement employee benefits other than pensions

iii
Table of Contents

ParentVistra Corp.
Petition DatePJMApril 29, 2014, the date the Debtors filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code
PJMPJM Interconnection, LLC
Plan of ReorganizationThird Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization filed by the Debtors in August 2016 and confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court in August 2016 solely with respect to the TCEH Debtors and the Contributed EFH Debtors
PrefCoVistra Preferred Inc.
iii
Table of Contents
PrefCo Preferred Stock Saleas part of the Spin-Off, the contribution of certain of the assets of the Predecessor and its subsidiaries by a subsidiary of TEX Energy LLC to PrefCo in exchange for all of PrefCo's authorized preferred stock, consisting of 70,000 shares, par value $0.01 per share
PUCTPublic PowerPublic Power, LLC (d/b/a Public Power), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra, a REP in certain areas of PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO and MISO that is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers
PUCTPublic Utility Commission of Texas
PURATexas Public Utility Regulatory Act
REPretail electric provider
RCTRailroad Commission of Texas, which among other things, has oversight of lignite mining activity in Texas
RTOregional transmission organization
S&PStandard & Poor's Ratings (a credit rating agency)
SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Securities ActSecurities Act of 1933, as amended
SG&Aselling, general and administrative
Settlement AgreementAmended and Restated Settlement Agreement among the Debtors, the Sponsor Group, settling TCEH first lien creditors, settling TCEH second lien creditors, settling TCEH unsecured creditors and the official committee of unsecured creditors of TCEH (collectively, the Settling Parties), approved by the Bankruptcy Court in December 2015.
SO2
sulfur dioxide
Spin-Offthe tax-free spin-off from EFH Corp. executed pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization on the Effective Date by the TCEH Debtors and the Contributed EFH Debtors
Sponsor GroupSTRefers, collectively, to certain investment funds affiliated with Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P., TPG Global, LLC (together with its affiliates, TPG) and GS Capital Partners, an affiliate of Goldman, Sachs & Co., that have an ownership interest in Texas Energy Future Holdings Limited Partnership, a limited partnership controlled by the Sponsor Group, that owns substantially all of the common stock of EFH Corp.steam turbine
STsteam turbine
Tax Matters AgreementTax Matters Agreement, dated as of the Effective Date, by and among EFH Corp., EFIH,Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc. and EFH Merger Co. LLC.LLC
TCJAThe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, federal income tax legislation enacted in December 2017, which significantly changed the tax laws applicable to business entities
TRATax Receivables Agreement, containing certain rights (TRA Rights) to receive payments from Vistra Energy related to certain tax benefits, including those it realized as a result of certain transactions entered into at Emergence (see Note 10)
TRETexas Reliability Entity, Inc., an independent organization that develops reliability standards for the ERCOT region and monitors and enforces compliance with NERC standards and monitors compliance with ERCOT protocols
TCEH or PredecessorTexas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company LLC, and, prior to the Effective Date, the parent company of the TCEH Debtors depending on context, that were engaged in electricity generation and wholesale and retail energy market activities, and whose major subsidiaries included Luminant and TXU Energy
TCEH Debtorsthe subsidiaries of TCEH that were Debtors in the Chapter 11 Cases
TCEH Senior Secured FacilitiesTCEQRefers, collectively, to the TCEH First Lien Term Loan Facilities, TCEH First Lien Revolving Credit Facility and TCEH First Lien Letter of Credit Facility with a total principal amount of $22.616 billion. The claims arising under these facilities were discharged in the Chapter 11 Cases on the Effective Date pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization.
TCEQTexas Commission on Environmental Quality

iv
Table of Contents

TRATax Receivables Agreement, containing certain rights (TRA Rights) to receive payments from Vistra related to certain tax benefits, including benefits realized as a result of certain transactions entered into at Emergence (see Note 8 to the Financial Statements)
TXUTRETexas Reliability Entity, Inc., an independent organization that develops reliability standards for the ERCOT region and monitors and enforces compliance with NERC standards and monitors compliance with ERCOT protocols
TriEagle EnergyTXUTriEagle Energy, Retail Company LLC,LP (d/b/a TriEagle Energy, TriEagle Energy Services, Eagle Energy, Energy Rewards, Power House Energy and Viridian Energy), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra, a REP in certain areas of ERCOT and PJM that is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers
TWhterawatt-hours
TXU EnergyTXU Energy Retail Company LLC (d/b/a TXU), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra that is a REP in competitive areas of ERCOT and is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers
U.S.United States of America
U.S. Gas & ElectricU.S. Gas and Electric, Inc. (d/b/a USG&E, Illinois Gas & Electric and ILG&E), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra, a REP in certain areas of PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO and MISO that is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers
Value Based BrandsValue Based Brands LLC (d/b/a 4Change Energy, Express Energy and ExpressVeteran Energy), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra Energy that is a REP in competitive areas of ERCOT and is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers
Vistra Energy or SuccessorVistra Energy Corp., formerly known as TCEH Corp., and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context. On the Effective Date, the TCEH Debtors and the Contributed EFH Debtors emerged from Chapter 11 and became subsidiaries of Vistra Energy Corp. Effective July 2, 2020, Vistra Energy Corp. changed its name to Vistra Corp.
Vistra IntermediateVistra Intermediate Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra
iv
Table of Contents
Vistra OperationsVistra Operations Company LLC, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra Energy that is the issuer of certain series of notes (see Note 1411 to the Financial Statements) and borrower under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities
Vistra Operations Credit FacilitiesVistra Operations Company LLC's $8.313$5.297 billion senior secured financing facilities (see Note 1411 to the Financial Statements)



v
Table of Contents

PART I


Item 1.BUSINESS

Item 1.BUSINESS

References in this report to "we," "our," "us" and "the Company" are to Vistra Energy and/or its subsidiaries, as apparent in the context. See Glossary for defined terms.


Business


Vistra Energy is a holding company operating an integrated retail and electric power generation business primarily in markets throughout the U.S. Through our subsidiaries, we are engaged in competitive electricity marketenergy activities including electricity generation, wholesale energy sales and purchases, commodity risk management and retail sales of electricity and natural gas to end users. We incorporated under Delaware law in 2016. Effective July 2, 2020, we changed our name from Vistra Energy Corp. to Vistra Corp. to distinguish from companies that are involved in exploring for, producing, refining, or transporting fossil fuels (many of which use "energy" in their names) and to better reflect our integrated business model, which combines a retail electricity and natural gas business focused on serving its customers with new and innovative products and services and an electric power generation business powering the communities we serve with safe, reliable power.


We serve approximately 2.84.5 million customers and operate in five states.20 states and the District of Columbia. Our generation fleet totals approximately 40,50038,700 MW of generation capacity with a portfolio of natural gas, nuclear, coal, solar and solarbattery energy storage facilities.


Vistra Energy has six reportable segments: (i) Retail, (ii) ERCOT,Texas, (iii) PJM,East, (iv) NY/NE (comprising NYISO and ISO-NE),West, (v) MISOSunset and (vi) Asset Closure. The PJM, NY/NE and MISOIn the third quarter of 2020, Vistra updated its reportable segments were established on the Merger Date to reflect markets served by businesses acquiredchanges in how the Merger.Company's Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) makes operating decisions, assesses performance and allocates resources. Management believes that the revised reportable segments provide enhanced transparency into the Company's long-term sustainable assets and its commitment to managing the retirement of economically and environmentally challenged plants. See Market Discussion below and Note 2220 to the Financial Statements for further information concerning the updates to our reportable business segments.


As of December 31, 2018, we had approximately 5,275 full-time employees, including approximately 2,030 employees under collective bargaining agreements.

Acquisitions and Merger


Ambit Transaction — On November 1, 2019, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra completed the acquisition of Ambit (Ambit Transaction). Because the Ambit Transaction closed on November 1, 2019, Vistra's consolidated financial statements and the notes related thereto do not include the financial condition or the operating results of Ambit and its subsidiaries prior to November 1, 2019. See Note 2 to the Financial Statements for a summary of the Ambit Transaction.

Crius Transaction — On July 15, 2019, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra completed the acquisition of the equity interests of two wholly owned subsidiaries of Crius that indirectly own the operating business of Crius (Crius Transaction). Because the Crius Transaction closed on July 15, 2019, Vistra's consolidated financial statements and the notes related thereto do not include the financial condition or the operating results of Crius and its subsidiaries prior to July 15, 2019. See Note 2 to the Financial Statements for a summary of the Crius Transaction.

Dynegy Merger Transaction — On the Merger Date, Vistra Energy and Dynegy completed the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Dynegy merged with and into Vistra, Energy, with Vistra Energy continuing as the surviving corporation. Because the Merger closed on April 9, 2018, Vistra's consolidated financial statements and the notes related thereto do not include the financial condition or the operating results of Dynegy prior to April 9, 2018. See Note 2 to the Financial Statements for a summary of the Merger transaction and business combination accounting.transaction.


1
Table of Contents
Business Strategy


Our business strategy is to deliver long-term stakeholder value through a focus on the following areas:


•Integrated business model. We believe the key factor that distinguishes us from others in the competitive electricity industry is the integrated nature of our business (i.e., pairing our reliable and efficient mining, diversified generation fleet and wholesale commodity risk management capabilities with our retail platform). Our business strategy will beis guided by our integrated business model because we believe it is our core competitive advantage and differentiates us from our non-integrated competitors. We believe our integrated business model creates a unique opportunity because, relative to our non-integrated competitors it reducesby reducing the effects of commodity price movements and contributescontributing to earnings and cash flow stability. Consequently, our integrated business model is at the core of our business strategy.


•Growth and transformation. Vistra's strategy is to grow our business through prudent investments in attractive retail, renewable, and energy storage assets while reducing our carbon footprint and creating a more sustainable company with enduring long-term value for our stakeholders. We expect to meaningfully transform our generation portfolio over the next decade by growing our portfolio of zero-carbon resources, including solar and energy storage, through our Vistra Zero brand and by retiring approximately 7,000 MWs of coal assets between now and year-end 2027. We believe our long-term asset mix will support electric system reliability while providing customers with cost-effective energy that meets their sustainable preferences. Our growth strategy leverages our core capabilities of multi-channel retail marketing in large and competitive markets, operating large-scale, environmentally sensitive, and diverse assets across a variety of fuel technologies, fuel logistics and management, commodity risk management, cost control, and energy infrastructure investing. We intend to opportunistically evaluate the acquisition and development of high-quality energy infrastructure assets and businesses, including renewable energy and battery storage assets as well as retail businesses, that complement our core capabilities and enable us to achieve operational or financial synergies. While we are intent on growing our business and creating value for our stockholders, we are committed to making disciplined investments that are consistent with our focus on maintaining a strong balance sheet and strong liquidity profile. As a result, consistent with our disciplined capital allocation approval process, growth opportunities we pursue must have compelling economic value and align with or enhance our business strategy.

•Disciplined capital allocation. Vistra takes a balanced approach to capital allocation, focusing on maintaining a strong balance sheet, investing prudently in the maintenance of our existing assets and potential growth acquisitions, and returning capital to shareholders.  Maintaining astockholders. A strong balance sheet ensures Vistra’shelps to ensure Vistra's interest expense is manageable in a variety of wholesale power price environments while giving Vistra access to flexible and diverse sources of liquidity. We prudently make necessary capital investments to maintain the safety and reliability of our facilities while also investing in new technologies when economic, including solar assets and battery storage systems, resulting in a continued modernization of Vistra’sVistra's generation fleet. Because we believe cost discipline and strong management of our assets and commodity positions are necessary to deliver long-term value to our stakeholders, we generally make capital allocation decisions that we believe will lead to attractive cash returns on investment, including by returning capital to our shareholders. In Junestockholders through quarterly dividends and November 2018, our board of directors (Board) authorized a share repurchase program under which up(see Note 14 to $500 millionthe Financial Statements).

•Superior customer service. Through our retail brands, including TXU Energy, Ambit Energy, Value Based Brands, Dynegy Energy Services, Homefield Energy, TriEagle Energy, Public Power and $1.25 billion, respectively,U.S. Gas & Electric, we serve the retail electricity and natural gas needs of end-use residential, small business, commercial and industrial electricity customers through multiple sales and marketing channels. In addition to benefitting from our outstanding common stock mayintegrated business model, we leverage our brands, our commitment to a consistent and reliable product offering, the backstop of the electricity generated by our generation fleet, our wholesale commodity risk management operations and our strong customer service to differentiate our products and services from our competitors. We strive to be repurchased. Through December 31, 2018, 33,495,016 sharesat the forefront of innovation with new offerings and customer experiences to reinforce our common stock had been repurchased undervalue proposition. We maintain a focus on solutions that give our customers choice, convenience and control over how and when they use electricity and related services, including TXU Energy's Free Nights and Solar Days residential plans, MyEnergy DashboardSM, TXU Energy's iThermostat product and mobile solution, the TXU Energy Rewards program, the TXU Energy Green UpSM renewable energy credit program and a diverse set of solar options. Our focus on superior customer service will guide our efforts to acquire new residential and commercial customers, serve and retain existing customers and maintain valuable sales channels for our electricity generation resources. We believe our customer service, products and trusted brands will result in the aggregate for $778 million (including related fees and expenses) at an average price per sharehigh residential customer retention rates, particularly in Texas where our TXU Energy brand has maintained its residential customers in a highly competitive retail market.

2
Table of common stock of $23.23. In November 2018, our Board adopted a dividend program pursuant to which we expect to initiate an annual dividend of approximately $0.50 per share, payable quarterly, beginning in the first quarter of 2019.Contents


•
Superior customer service. Through TXU Energy and Value Based Brands in Texas, Dynegy Energy Services in Massachusetts, Ohio, Illinois and Pennsylvania and Homefield Energy in Illinois, we serve the retail electricity needs of end-use residential, small business, commercial and industrial electricity customers through multiple sales and marketing channels. In addition to benefitting from our integrated business model, we leverage our brands, our commitment to a consistent and reliable product offering, the backstop of the electricity generated by our generation fleet, our wholesale commodity risk management operations and our strong customer service to differentiate our products and services from our competitors. We strive to be at the forefront of innovation with new offerings and customer experiences to reinforce our value proposition. We maintain a focus on solutions that give our customers choice, convenience and control over how and when they use electricity and related services, including TXU Energy's Free Nights and Solar Days residential plans, MyEnergy DashboardSM, TXU Energy's iThermostat product and mobile solution, the TXU Energy Rewards program, the TXU Energy Green UpSM renewable energy credit program and a diverse set of solar options. Our focus on superior customer service will guide our efforts to acquire new residential and commercial customers, serve and retain existing customers and maintain valuable sales channels for our electricity generation resources. We believe our customer service, products and trusted TXU Energy brand have resulted in maintaining the highest residential customer retention rate of any Texas retail electric provider in its respective core market.

•Excellence in operations while maintaining an efficient cost structure. We believe that operating our facilities in a safe, reliable, environmentally compliant, and cost-effective and efficient manner is a foundation for delivering long-term stakeholder value. We also believe stakeholder value increasesis increased as a functionresult of making disciplined investments that enable our generation facilities to operate not only effectively and efficiently, but also safely, reliably and in an environmentally compliant manner. We believe that an ongoing focus on operational excellence and safety is a key component to success in a highly competitive environment and is part of the unique value proposition of our integrated model. Additionally, we are committed to optimizing our cost structure, reducing our debt levels and implementing enterprise-wide process and operating improvements without compromising the safety of our communities, customers and employees. We believe we have a highly effective and efficient cost structure and that our cost structure supports excellence in our operations.


•Integrated hedging and commercial management. Our commercial team is focused on managing risk, through opportunistic hedging, and optimizing our assets and business positions. We actively seek to manage our exposure to wholesale electricity prices in markets in which we operate, on an integrated basis, through contracts for physical delivery of electricity, exchange-traded and over-the-counter financial contracts, term, day-ahead and real-time market transactions, and bilateral contracts with other wholesale market participants, including other power generators and end-user electricity customers. These hedging activities include short-term agreements, long-term electricity sales contracts and forward sales of natural gas through financial instruments. The historically positive correlation between natural gas prices and wholesale electricity prices has provided us an opportunity to manage our exposure to the variability of wholesale electricity prices through natural gas hedging activities. We seek to hedge near-term cash flowflows and optimize long term value through hedging and forward sales contracts. We believe our integrated hedging and commercial management strategy, in combination with a strong balance sheet and strong liquidity profile, will provide a long-term advantage through cycles of higher and lower commodity prices.


Growth and enhancement. Our growth strategy leverages our core capabilities of multi-channel retail marketing in a large and competitive market, operating large-scale, environmentally sensitive, and diverse assets across a variety of fuel technologies, fuel logistics and management, commodity risk management, cost control, and energy infrastructure investing. We intend to opportunistically evaluate acquisitions of high-quality energy infrastructure assets and businesses that complement these core capabilities and enable us to achieve operational or financial synergies. We are also focused on enhancing our retail platform in markets outside of Texas, including our recently announced entry into a purchase agreement to acquire Crius Energy Trust discussed below. While we are intent on growing our business and creating value for our stockholders, we are committed to making disciplined investments that are consistent with our focus on maintaining a strong balance sheet and strong liquidity profile. As a result, consistent with our disciplined capital allocation approval process, growth opportunities we pursue will need to have compelling economic value in addition to fitting with our business strategy.


•Corporate responsibility and citizenship. We are committed to providing safe, reliable, cost-effective and environmentally compliant electricity for the communities and customers we serve. We strive to improve the quality of life in the communities in which we operate. We are also committed to being a good corporate citizen in the communities in which we conduct operations. We and our employees are actively engaged in programs intended to support and strengthen the communities in which we conduct operations. Our foremost giving initiatives are through the United Way, and TXU Energy Aid and Ambit Cares campaigns. TXU Energy Aid has servedserves as an integral resource for social service agencies that assist familiesthose in need across Texas pay their electricity bills.
Ambit Cares partners with Feeding America® to assist those in need across the U.S. by fighting hunger through a network of food banks.


Recent Developments


Entry into Purchase Agreement to Acquire Crius Energy Trust Dividend Declaration— OnIn February 7, 2019, Vistra Energy2021, the Board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share that will be paid in March 2021.

Change in Principal Financial Officer — In December 2020, James A. Burke, who previously served as the Company's Executive Vice President and Crius Energy Trust (Crius) entered into a definitive agreement, whichChief Operating Officer, was subsequently amended on February 19, 2019 (as amended,elected as President and Chief Financial Officer and assumed the Crius Purchase Agreement),duties of serving as a resultthe Company's Principal Financial Officer following the resignation of an unsolicited acquisition proposal, pursuant to which Vistra Energy will acquire the equity interest of two wholly owned subsidiaries of Crius that indirectly own the operating business of Crius (Crius Transaction). Crius is an energy retailer selling both electricityDavid A. Campbell from his roles as Chief Financial Officer and natural gas products to residential and small business customers in 19 states and the District of Columbia.

The acquisition provides a high degree of overlap with Vistra Energy's generation fleet and contains approximately 11.6 TWh of annual load, improving Vistra Energy's match of its generation to load profile to approximately 45 percent, reducing risk. The acquisition also establishes a platform for future growth by leveraging Vistra Energy's existing retail marketing capabilities and Crius's experienced team. The acquisition enhances the integrated value proposition through collateral and transaction efficiencies, particularly via Crius's largely retail portfolio.

Vistra Energy intends to fund the purchase price of approximately $378 million using cash on hand and assumption of Crius's net debt of approximately $108 million. CompletionPrincipal Financial Officer of the Crius Transaction is subject to various customary conditions, including, among others, (i) approval by at least two-thirds of the Crius unitholders and (ii) receipt of all requisite regulatory approvals, which include approvals of the FERC and the expiration and termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976. Pending the receipt of all necessary approvals and the fulfillment of all other customary closing conditions, the parties expect the transaction to close in the second quarter of 2019.Company.


Dividend DeclarationShare Repurchase Program — On February 26, 2019, Vistra EnergyIn September 2020, we announced that the Board had declaredauthorized a dividend pursuantnew share repurchase program (Share Repurchase Program) under which up to which Vistra Energy would pay, to each holder of record as of March 15, 2019, a dividend of $0.125 per share, to be paid March 29, 2019.

Issuance of Vistra Operations 5.625% Senior Notes Due 2027 — In February 2019, Vistra Operations issued and sold $1.3$1.5 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.625% senior notes due 2027 in an offering to eligible purchasers under Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The senior notes were sold pursuant to a purchase agreement by and among Vistra Operations, certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of Vistra Operations and J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC, as representative of the several initial purchasers. Net proceeds from the sale of the senior notes totaling approximately $1.287 billion, together with cash on hand, were used to pay the purchase price and accrued interest (together with fees and expenses) required in connection with (i) the 2019 Tender Offer described below, (ii) the redemption of approximately $35 million aggregate principal amount of our 7.375% senior notes due 2022 and (iii) the redemption of the remaining approximately $25 million aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 8.034% senior notes due 2024.shares of common stock may be repurchased. The Share Repurchase Program became effective January 1, 2021, at which time the prior share repurchase plan and all authorized amounts remaining thereunder terminated as of such date. From January 1, 2021 through February 23, 2021, 5,902,720 shares of our common stock had been repurchased under the Share Repurchase Program for $125 million. See Note 14 to the Financial Statements for more information concerning the Share Repurchase Program and the Prior Share Repurchase Program.


2019 Tender Offer and Consent Solicitation — In February 2019, Vistra Energy used the net proceeds from the issuance
3
Table of the Vistra Operations 5.625% senior notes due 2027 to fund a cash tender offer (the 2019 Tender Offer) to purchase for cash approximately $1.193 billion aggregate principal amount of 7.375% senior notes due 2022 assumed in the Merger.Contents

Market Discussion


The operations of Vistra Energy are aligned into six reportable business segments: (i) Retail, (ii) ERCOT,Texas, (iii) PJM,East, (iv) NY/NE,West, (v) MISOSunset and (vi) Asset Closure. In the third quarter of 2020, Vistra updated its reportable segments to reflect changes in how the Company's CODM makes operating decisions, assesses performance and allocates resources. Management believes that the revised reportable segments provide enhanced transparency into the Company's long-term sustainable assets and its commitment to managing the retirement of economically and environmentally challenged plants. The Retailfollowing is a summary of the updated segments:

•The Sunset segment is engagedrepresents plants with announced retirement plans that were previously reported in retail sales of electricity and related services to residential, commercial and industrial customers. Thethe ERCOT, PJM NY/NE (comprising NYISO and ISO-NE) and MISO segments are engagedsegments. As we announced significant plant closures in the third quarter of 2020, management believes it is important to have a segment which differentiates between operating plants with defined retirement plans and operating plants without defined retirement plans.
•The East segment represents Vistra's electricity generation wholesale energy sales and purchases, commodity risk management activities, fuel production and fuel logistics management, all largely within their respective RTOoperations in the Eastern Interconnection of the U.S. electric grid, other than assets that are now part of the Sunset or ISO market. The Asset Closure segment is engagedsegments, respectively, and includes operations in PJM, ISO-NE and NYISO that were previously reported in the decommissioningPJM and reclamation of retired plantsNY/NE segments, respectively.
•The West segment represents Vistra's electricity generation operations in CAISO and mines. Our CAISO operations are includedwas previously reported in the Corporate and Other non-segment as ournon-segment. As reflected by the Moss Landing and Oakland ESS projects (see Note 3 to the Financial Statements), the Company expects to expand its operations in the CAISO market do not materially affectWest segment.

In addition, the ERCOT segment was renamed the Texas segment. There were no changes to the Retail and Asset Closure segments. All historical segment results within these consolidated financial statements have been recast to be in alignment with our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.new segmentation. See Note 2220 to the Financial Statements for additionalfurther information related to our operatingconcerning reportable segments.



Independent System Operators (ISOs) and Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs) and Independent System Operators (ISOs)


Separately, ISOs/RTOs and ISOs administer the transmission infrastructure and markets across a regional footprint in most of the markets in which we operate. They are responsible for dispatching all generation facilities in their respective footprints and are responsible for both maximum utilization and reliable and efficient operation of the transmission system. ISOs/RTOs and ISOs administer energy and ancillary service markets in the short term, which usually consists of day-ahead and real-time markets. Several ISOs/RTOs and ISOs also ensure long-term planning reserves through monthly, semiannual, annual and multiyearmulti-year capacity markets. The ISOs/RTOs and ISOs that oversee most of the wholesale power markets in which we operate currently impose, and will likely continue to impose, bid and price limits or other similar mechanisms. NERC regions and RTOs/ISOsISOs/RTOs often have different geographic footprints, and while there may be geographic overlap between NERC regions and RTOs/ISOs,ISOs/RTOs, their respective roles and responsibilities do not generally overlap.


In ISO/RTO and ISO regions with centrally dispatched market structures (e.g., ERCOT, PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO, MISO, and CAISO), all generators selling into the centralized market receive the same price for energy sold based on the bid price associated with the production of the last MWh that is needed to balance supply with demand within a designated zone or at a given location. Different zones or locations within the same RTO/ISOISO/RTO may produce different prices respective to other zones within the same RTO/ISOISO/RTO due to transmission losses and congestion. For example, a less efficient and/or less economical natural gas-fueled unit may be needed in some hours to meet demand. If this unit's production is required to meet demand on the margin, its offer price will set the market clearing price that will be paid for all dispatched generation in the same zone or location (although the price paid at other zones or locations may vary because of transmission losses and congestion), regardless of the price that any other unit may have offered into the market. In RTO and ISO regions with centrally dispatched market structures and location-based marginal price clearing structures (e.g. PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO, ERCOT, MISO, and CAISO), generatorsGenerators will receive the location-based marginal price for their output. The location-based marginal price, absent congestion, would be the marginal price of the most expensive unit needed to meet demand. In regions that are outside the footprint of RTOs/ISOs, prices are determined on a bilateral basis between buyers and sellers.


Retail Markets


The Retail segment is engaged in retail sales of electricity, natural gas and related services to approximately 2.84.5 million customers. Substantially all of these activities are conducted by TXU Energy, andAmbit Energy, Value Based Brands, in Texas, Dynegy Energy Services, in Massachusetts, Ohio, Illinois and Pennsylvania and Homefield Energy, in Illinois.TriEagle Energy, Public Power and U.S. Gas & Electric across 19 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.


4
Table of Contents
The largest portion of our retail operations are in Texas, where we provide retail electricity to approximately 1.72.4 million customers in ERCOT. We are an active participant in the competitive ERCOT retail market and continue to be a market leader, which we believe is driven by, among other things, having one of the loweststrong brands, innovative products and services and excellent customer complaint rates according to the PUCT and having an integrated power generation and wholesale operation that allows us to efficiently obtain the electricity needed to serve our customers at the lowest cost.service. As of December 31, 2018,2020, we provided electricity to approximately 23% and 20%31% of the residential and commercial customers in ERCOT respectively.and for approximately 15% of business customers' demand. We believe that we have differentiated ourselves by providing a distinctive customer experience predicated on delivering reliable and innovative power products and solutions to our customers, such as Free Nights and Solar Days residential plans, MyEnergy DashboardSM, TXU iThermostat product and mobile solution, the TXU Energy Rewards program, the TXU Energy Green UPSM renewable energy credit program and a diverse set of solar options, which give our customers choice, convenience and control over how and when they use electricity and related services. We competitively marketOur retail business also offers a comprehensive suite of green products and services, including 100% wind and solar options, as well as thermostats, dashboards and other programs designed to encourage reduced consumption and increased energy efficiency.

Our integrated power generation and wholesale operation allows us to efficiently obtain the electricity and related servicesneeded to acquire, serve and retain retail customers. We believe we are situated to better serve our retail customers through our unique affiliation with our wholesale commodity risk management personnel who canat the lowest cost. The integrated model enables us to structure products and contracts in a way that offers significant value compared to stand-alone retail electric providers. Additionally, our wholesale commodity risk management operations protect our retail business from power price volatility by allowing us to bypass bid-ask spread in the market (particularly for illiquid products and time periods), which results in significantly and achieve lower collateral costs for our retail business as compared to other, non-integrated retail electric providers. Moreover, our retail business reduces, to some extent, the exposure of our wholesale generation business to wholesale power price volatility. This is because the retail load requirements of our retail operations (primarily TXU Energy) provide a natural offset to the length of Luminant's generation portfolio thereby reducing the exposure to wholesale power price volatility as compared to a non-integrated independent power producer.


WeOutside of ERCOT, we also serve residential, municipal, commercial and industrial customers substantially through our Homefield Energy, and Dynegy Energy Services, Public Power, U.S. Gas & Electric and Ambit Energy retail businesses, through which we provide retail electricity, natural gas and related services to approximately 1.12.1 million customers in Illinois, Massachusetts, Ohio18 states and Pennsylvania.the District of Columbia.



Texas Segment
ERCOT Market

Our Texas segment is comprised of 18 power generation facilities totaling 17,623 MW of generation capacity in ERCOT. We also operate a 10 MW battery energy storage system (ESS) at our Upton 2 solar facility. In September 2020, we announced the planned development of 668 MW of solar photovoltaic power generation facilities and 260 MW of battery ESS in Texas with estimated commercial operation dates between the summer of 2021 and the fall of 2022. See Note 3 to the Financial Statements for a summary of our solar and battery energy storage projects.

ISO/RTOTechnologyPrimary FuelNumber of FacilitiesNet Capacity (MW)
ERCOTCCGTNatural Gas77,838 
ERCOTSTCoal23,850 
ERCOTCT or STNatural Gas73,455 
ERCOTNuclearNuclear12,300 
ERCOTSolar/BatteryRenewable1180 
Total Texas Segment1817,623 

ERCOT — ERCOT is an ISO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 78,00086,000 MW of installed generation capacity to approximately 2526 million Texas customers, representing approximately 90% of the state's electric load.


5
Table of Contents
As an energy-only market, ERCOT's market design is distinct from other competitive electricity markets in the U.S. Other markets maintain a minimum planning reserve margin through regulated planning, resource adequacy requirements and/or capacity markets. In contrast, ERCOT's resource adequacy is predominately dependent on energy-market price signals. In 2014, ERCOT implemented the Operating Reserve Demand Curve (ORDC), pursuant to which wholesale electricity prices in the real-time electricity market increase automatically as available operating reserves decrease below defined threshold levels, creating a price adder. When operating reserves drop to 2,000 MW or less, the ORDC automatically adjusts power prices to the established value of lost load (VOLL), which is set at $9,000/MWh. BecauseMWh which is equal to the system-wide offer cap. In both March 2019 and March 2020, ERCOT has limited excess generation capacity to meetimplemented 0.25 standard deviation shifts in the loss of load probability calculation using a single blended ORDC curve; these changes resulted in a more rapid escalation in power prices as operating reserves fall below defined thresholds. ERCOT calculates the "peaker net margin" based on revenues a hypothetical unhedged peaking unit would collect in the market. If the peaker net margin exceeds a certain threshold, the system-wide offer cap is reduced for the remainder of the calendar year. Historically, high demand days due to its minimal import capacity, and peaking facilities have high operating costs, the marginal price of supply rapidly increases during periods of high demand. Historically, elevated temperatures in the summer months, have driven high electricity demand in ERCOT. Many generators benefit from these sporadiccombined with underperformance of wind generation, has created the conditions during which the ORDC contributes meaningfully to power prices. Extreme weather conditions can also lead to scarcity conditions regardless of season. Other than during periods of "scarcity pricing" in whichpricing," the price of power is typically set by natural gas-fueled generation facilities; as a result, historically low natural gas prices may increase significantly, up to the current $9,000/MWh price cap.have had a corresponding impact on wholesale prices (see Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Key Operational Risks and Challenges).


Transactions in ERCOT take place in two key markets: the day-ahead market and the real-time market. The day-ahead market is a voluntary, forwardfinancial electricity market conducted the day before each operating day in which generators and purchasers of electricity may bid for one or more hours of electricity supply or consumption. The real-time market is a spotphysical market in which electricity may be soldis dispatched and priced in five-minute intervals. The day-ahead market provides market participants with visibility into where prices are expected to clear, and the prices are not impacted by subsequent events. Conversely, the real-time market exposes purchasers to the risk of transient operational events and price spikes. These two markets allow market participants to manage their risk profile by adjusting their participation in each market. In addition, ERCOT uses ancillary services to maintain system reliability, including regulation service-up, regulation service-down,service, responsive reserve service and non-spinning reserve service. Regulation service upAncillary services are provided by generators to help maintain the stable voltage and down are used to balancefrequency requirements of the grid in a near-instantaneous fashion when supply and demand fluctuate due to a variety of factors, such as weather, generation outages, renewable production intermittency and transmission outages. Responsive reserves and non-spinning reserves are used by ERCOT when the grid is at, near or recovering from a state of emergency due to inadequate generation.system. Because ERCOT has one of the highest concentrations of wind capacity generation among U.S. markets, the ERCOT market is more susceptible to fluctuations in wholesale electricity supply due to intermittent wind production, making ERCOT more vulnerable to periods of generation scarcity.


East Segment

Our ERCOTEast segment is comprised of 2021 power generation facilities located in Texas10 states totaling 18,36612,093 MW of generation capacity. Our ERCOT fleet includes seven CCGT natural gas-fueled generation facilities totaling 7,838 MW, three lignite/coal-fueled generation facilities totaling 4,500 MW, eight natural gas-fueled peaking generation facilities totaling 3,538 MW, a nuclear generation facility totaling 2,300 MW, a solar photovoltaic power generation facility totaling 180 MWgenerating capacity in PJM, ISO-NE and a battery energy storage system totaling 10 MW.NYISO.


PJM Market
ISO/RTOTechnologyPrimary FuelNumber of FacilitiesNet Capacity (MW)
PJMCCGTNatural Gas86,081 
PJMCTNatural Gas41,346 
PJMCTFuel Oil293 
ISO-NECCGTNatural Gas63,361 
NYISOCCGTNatural Gas11,212 
Total East Segment2112,093 


PJM — PJM is an RTO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 178,000180,000 MW of installed generation capacity to approximately 65 million customers in all or parts of Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of Columbia.


6
Table of Contents
Like ERCOT, PJM administers markets for wholesale electricity and provides transmission planning for the region, utilizing a locational marginal pricing (LMP) methodology which calculates a price for every generator and load point within PJM. This market is transparent, allowing generators and load serving entities to see real-time price effects, transmission constraints and the impacts of congestion at each pricing point. PJM operates day-ahead and real-time markets into which generators can bid to provide energy and ancillary services. PJM also administers a forward capacity auction, the Reliability Pricing Model (RPM), which establishes a long-term marketsmarket for capacity. We have participated in RPM base residual auctions for years up to and including PJM's planning year 2021-2022, which ends May 31, 2022. Due to a change in auction rules, PJM's next RPM auction, for planning year 2022-2023, was delayed until May 2021. We also enter into bilateral capacity transactions. PJM's Capacity Performance (CP) rules arewere designed to improve system reliability and include penalties for under-performing units and reward for over-performing units during shortage events. PJM's base capacity resources are those capacity resources not capable of sustained, predictable operation throughout the entire delivery year, but can provide energy and reserves during hot weather operations. The base capacity resources are subject to non-performance charges assessed during emergency conditions from June through September. Full transition of the capacity market to CP rules will occur byoccurred in planning year 2020-2021. An independent market monitor continually monitors PJM markets to ensure a robust, competitive market and to identify an improper behavior by any entity.



Our PJM segment is comprised of 17 power generation facilities totaling 10,769 MW of generating capacity. Our PJM fleet includes eight CCGT natural gas-fueled generation facilities totaling 5,902 MW, three coal-fueled generation facilities totaling 3,428 MW and six natural gas- or oil-fueled generation facilities totaling 1,439 MW. Of these facilities, eight are located in Ohio, three in Pennsylvania, three in Illinois and one each in New Jersey, Virginia and West Virginia.

NYISO and ISO-NE Markets

NYISO — ISO-NE is an ISO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 39,00031,000 MW of installed generation capacity to approximately 2015 million customers in the states of Vermont, New York customers.Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Maine.


The NYISO marketISO-NE dispatches power plants to meet system energy and reliability needs and settles physical power deliveries at LMPs. Its energy markets allow market participants to buy and sell energy and ancillary services at prices established through real-time and day-ahead auctions. Energy prices vary among the participating states in ISO-NE and are largely influenced by transmission constraints and fuel supply. ISO-NE offers a forward capacity market where capacity prices are determined through auctions. Performance incentive rules have the potential to increase capacity payments for those resources that are providing excess energy or reserves during a shortage event, while penalizing those that produce less than the required level.

NYISO — NYISO is an ISO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 40,000 MW of installed generation capacity to approximately 20 million New York customers.

NYISO dispatches power plants to meet system energy and reliability needs and settles physical power deliveries at LMPs. Its energy markets allow market participants to buy and sell energy and ancillary services at prices established through real-time and day-ahead auctions. Energy prices vary among the regional zones in the NYISO and are largely influenced by transmission constraints and fuel supply. NYISO offers a forward capacity market where capacity prices are determined through auctions. Strip auctions occur one to two months prior to the commencement of a six-month seasonal planning period. Subsequent auctions provide an opportunity to sell excess capacity for the balance of the seasonal planning period or the upcoming month. Due to the short-term nature of the NYISO-operated capacity auctions and a relatively liquid bilateral market for NYISO capacity products, our Independence facility sells a significant portion of its capacity through bilateral transactions. The balance is cleared through the seasonal and monthly capacity auctions.


ISO-NE is an ISO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 31,000 MW of installed generation capacity to approximately 15 million customers in the states of Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Maine.West Segment


ISO-NE dispatches power plants to meet system energy and reliability needs and settles physical power deliveries at LMPs. Energy prices vary among the participating states in ISO-NE and are largely influenced by transmission constraints and fuel supply. ISO-NE offers a forward capacity market where capacity prices are determined through auctions. Performance incentive rules went into effect for planning year 2018-2019 (FCA-9), which will have the potential to increase capacity payments for those resources that are providing excess energy or reserves during a shortage event, while penalizing those that produce less than the required level.

Our NY/NEWest segment is comprised of eight CCGT natural gas-fueledtwo power generation facilities totaling 4,7301,185 MW of generation capacity. Of these facilities, four are locatedin Massachusetts, two in Connecticutcapacity and one eachbattery ESS totaling 300 MW in Maine and New York.CAISO, all of which are located in California.


MISO Market
ISO/RTOTechnologyPrimary FuelNumber of FacilitiesNet Capacity (MW)
CAISOCCGTNatural Gas11,020 
CAISOBatteryRenewable1300 
CAISOCTFuel Oil1165 
Total West Segment31,485 


MISO is an RTO that manages the flow of electricity fromIn addition, we are developing approximately 200,000136 MW of installed capacitybattery energy storage systems at our Moss Landing and Oakland facilities that are expected to approximately 42 million customersenter commercial operations in all or parts of Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, Louisiana, Montana, South Dakota and Manitoba, Canada.

The MISO energy market is designed to ensure that all market participants have open-access2021-2022 (see Note 3 to the transmission system on a non-discriminatory basis. MISO, as an independent RTO, maintains functional control over the use of the transmission system to ensure transmission circuits do not exceed their secure operating limits and become overloaded. MISO operates day-ahead and real-time energy markets using a similar LMP methodology as described above for the PJM market. An independent market monitor is responsible for evaluating the performance of the markets and identifying conduct by market participants or MISO that may compromise the efficiency or distort the outcome of the markets.Financial Statements).


MISO administers a one-year FCA for the next planning year from June 1st of the current year to May 31st of the following year. We participate in these auctions with open capacity that has not been committed through bilateral or retail transactions. We also participate in the MISO annual and monthly FTR auctions to manage the cost of our transmission congestion, as measured by the congestion component of the LMP price differential between two points on the transmission grid across the market area.

Our MISO segment is comprised of eight power generation facilities located in Illinois totaling 5,476 MW of generation capacity. Joppa, which is within the Electric Energy, Inc. (EEI) control area, is interconnected to Tennessee Valley Authority and Louisville Gas and Electric Company, but primarily sells its capacity and energy to MISO. We currently offer a portion of our MISO segment generating capacity and energy into PJM. Our Coffeen, Duck Creek, Edwards and Newton generation facilities have 2,540 MW electrically tied into PJM through pseudo-tie arrangements. Our Hennepin generation facility offers 294 MW of the facility's energy and capacity into PJM as a block schedule and began dispatching as a pseudo-tie unit for planning year 2018-2019.


CAISO Market

— CAISO is an ISO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 60,000 MW of installed capacity to approximately 3032 million customers primarily in California, representing approximately 80% percent of the state's electric load.


7
Table of Contents
Energy is priced in CAISO utilizing an LMP methodology as described above.methodology. The capacity market is comprised of Generic, Flexible and Local Resource Adequacy (RA) Capacity and is administered by the California Public Utilities Commission. Unlike other centrally cleared capacity markets, the resource adequacy market in California is a bilaterally traded market. In November 2016, CAISO implemented a voluntary capacity auction for annual, monthly, and intra-month procurement to cover for deficiencies in the market. The voluntary Competitive Solicitation Process, which FERC approved in October 2015, is a modification to the Capacity Procurement Mechanism (CPM) and provides another avenue to sell RA capacity. There have been recent CPM designations through the Competitive Solicitation Process. These include Moss Landing Unit 1 for 510 MW for the calendar year 2018 and Moss Landing Unit 2 intra-monthly designation for 29 MW for September through November 2018.


Sunset Segment

Our CAISO operations areSunset segment is comprised of two10 power generation facilities located in California totaling 1,1857,486 MW of generating capacity. Our CAISO fleet includes one CCGT natural gas-fueledcapacity in MISO, PJM and ERCOT. The Sunset segment represents plants with announced retirement plans between 2022 and 2027 that were previously reported in the ERCOT, PJM and MISO segments No separate segment previously existed to differentiate operating plants with defined retirement plans from operating plants without defined retirement plans. See Note 4 to the Financial Statements for more information related to these planned generation facility totaling 1,020retirements.

ISO/RTOTechnologyPrimary FuelNumber of FacilitiesNet Capacity (MW)
ERCOTSTCoal1650 
MISOSTCoal43,187 
MISOCTNatural Gas2221 
PJMSTCoal33,428 
Total Sunset Segment107,486 

See Texas Segment above for a discussion of the ERCOT ISO and East Segment above for a discussion of the PJM RTO.

MISO — MISO is an RTO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 198,000 MW of installed generation capacity to approximately 42 million customers in all or parts of Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, Louisiana, Montana, South Dakota and one oil-fueled generation facility totaling 165 MW. InManitoba, Canada.

MISO dispatches power plants to meet system energy and reliability needs and settles physical power deliveries at LMPs. Its energy markets allow market participants to buy and sell energy and ancillary services at prices established through real-time and day-ahead auctions. Energy prices vary among the regional zones in MISO and are largely influenced by transmission constraints and fuel supply. An independent market monitor is responsible for evaluating the performance of the markets and identifying conduct by market participants or MISO that may compromise the efficiency or distort the outcome of the markets.

MISO administers a one-year Planning Resource Auction for the next planning year from June 2018, we announced1st of the current year to May 31st of the following year. We participate in these auctions with open capacity that we will enter into a 20-year resource adequacy contract with Pacifichas not been committed through bilateral or retail transactions. We also participate in the MISO annual and monthly financial transmission rights auctions to manage the cost of our transmission congestion, as measured by the congestion component of the LMP price differential between two points on the transmission grid across the market area.

Joppa, which is partially interconnected to MISO and partially within the Electric Energy, Inc. (EEI) control area, is interconnected to the Tennessee Valley Authority and Louisville Gas and Electric Company (PG&E)Company. Joppa primarily sells its capacity and energy to develop a 300 MW battery energy storage project at our Moss Landing Power Plant site in California. PG&E filed its application with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in June 2018 and the CPUC approved the contract in November 2018. We anticipate the battery storage project will enter commercial operations by the fourth quarterMISO.

8
Table of 2020.Contents

Wholesale Operations


Our wholesale commodity risk management group is responsible for dispatching our generation fleet in response to market needs after implementing portfolio optimization strategies, thus linking and integrating the generation fleet production with our retail customer and wholesale sales opportunities. Market demand, also known as load, faced by electric power systems, such as those we operate in, varies from moment to moment as a result of changes in business and residential demand, which is often driven by weather. Unlike most other commodities, the production and consumption of electricity must remain balanced on an instantaneous basis. There is a certain baseline demand for electricity across an electric power system that occurs throughout the day, which is typically satisfied by baseload generating units with low variable operating costs. Baseload generating units can also increase output to satisfy certain incremental demand and reduce output when demand is unusually low. Intermediate/load-following generating units, which can more efficiently change their output to satisfy increases in demand, typically satisfy a large proportion of changes in intraday load as they respond to daily increases in demand or unexpected changes in supply created by reduced generation from renewable resources or other generator outages. Peak daily loads may be satisfied by peaking units. Peaking units are typically the most expensive to operate, but they can quickly start up and shut down to meet brief peaks in demand. In general, baseload units, intermediate/load following units and peaking units are dispatched into the RTO/ISOISO/RTO grid in order from lowest to highest variable cost. Price formation is typically based on the highest variable cost unit that clears the market to satisfy system demand at a given point in time.


Our commodity risk management group also enters into electricity, gas and other commodity derivative contracts to reduce exposure to changes in prices primarily to hedge future revenues and fuel costs for our generation facilities and purchased power costs for our Retail segment.


Seasonality


The demand for and market prices of electricity and natural gas are affected by weather. As a result, our operating results are impacted by extreme or sustained weather conditions and may fluctuate on a seasonal basis. Typically, demand for and the price of electricity is higher in the summer and winter seasons, when the temperatures are more extreme, and the demand for and price of natural gas is also generally higher in the winter. More severe weather conditions such as heat waves or extreme winter weather have made, and may make such fluctuations more pronounced. However, not all regions of the U.S. typically experience extreme weather conditions at the same time, so Vistra Energy is typically not exposed to the effects of extreme weather in all parts of its business at once. The pattern of this fluctuation may change depending on, among other things, the retail load served and the terms of contracts to purchase or sell electricity.



Competition


Competition in the markets in which we operate is impacted by electricity and fuel prices, congestion along the power grid, subsidies provided by state and federal governments for new and existing generation facilities, new market entrants, construction of new generating assets, technological advances in power generation, the actions of environmental and other regulatory authorities, and other factors. We primarily compete with other electricity generators and retailers based on our ability to generate electric supply, market and sell electricity at competitive prices and to efficiently utilize transportation from third-party pipelines and transmission from electric utilities to deliver electricity to end-users. Competitors in the generation and retail power markets in which we participate include numerous regulated utilities, industrial companies, non-utility generators, competitive subsidiaries of regulated utilities, independent power producers, REPs and other energy marketers. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for additional information concerning the risks faced with respect to the competitive energy markets in which we operate.


Brand Value


Our TXU Energy brand, which has been used to sell electricity to customers in the competitive retail electricity market in Texas for approximately 1719 years, is registered and protected by trademark law and is the only material intellectual property asset that we own. We have also acquired the trade names for Ambit Energy, Dynegy Energy Services, Homefield Energy, TriEagle Energy, Public Power and U.S. Gas & Electric through the Ambit Transaction, Crius Transaction and the Merger, as the case may be. As of December 31, 2018,2020, we have reflected an intangible assetassets on our balance sheet for the TXU Energy brandour trade names of approximately $1.2$1.374 billion (see Note 86 to the Financial Statements).


9
Table of Contents
Human Capital Resources

As a key component of our core principle that we work as a team, Vistra believes our most valuable asset is our talented, dedicated and diverse group of employees who work together to achieve our objectives, and our top priority is ensuring their safety. One of Vistra's core principles is that we care about our key stakeholders, including our employees. We invest in our people through numerous development and training opportunities, engaging employee programs and generous benefit and wellness offerings.

As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately 5,365 full-time employees, including approximately 1,640 employees under collective bargaining agreements.

Safety

Vistra's mindset around safety is exemplified by our motto: Best Defense. Everyone wins. No one gets hurt. Our safety culture revolves around people and human performance. We place a high importance on continuous improvement, along with a keen focus on numerous learning and error-prevention tools. To facilitate a learning environment, our various operating plants share their investigations and learnings of all safety events with all operations employees on weekly calls. The information is presented by front-line employees and supported by management. The lessons from each event are shared across the fleet to prevent similar incidents at other locations. All personnel at Vistra locations are encouraged to be actively involved in the safety process. Managers are required to participate in safety engagements with staff to enable constant communication and sustained interaction. In 2020, the generation fleet conducted more than 57,000 leadership safety engagements across the fleet continuing our employee driven safety program focused on engagement of all employees.

Our focus on reducing the severity of injuries for both our employees and contractors who work with us has shown positive results. In 2020, we did not have any serious injuries or fatalities to our Vistra employees. Although we do not focus on recordable incidents, our Total Recordable Incident rate (TRIR) for the company was 0.61, better than the first quartile as compared to the Edison Electric Institute (EEI) 2019 Total Company Injury data. We encourage near-miss reporting and review of events to promote a learning environment. In 2020, safety learning calls were held every week where near miss and safety events were reviewed by our operating teams to promote learning across the fleet.

All Vistra employees are covered by our safety program. Office employees are required to complete periodic training on safety topics through our online learning management system. Power plant employees are required to complete trainings based on job function, which is also tracked through our central learning management system. In addition, the Company engages an independent third-party conformity assessment and certification vendor to manage adherence to our safety standards for all vendors and contractors who work at our plants. In addition, we work closely with our suppliers and contractors to ensure our safety practices are upheld.

Our generation fleet has a total of 12 plants that have been awarded the Voluntary Protection Program (VPP) Star designation by the OSHA for superior demonstration of effective safety and health management systems and for maintaining injury and illness rates below the national averages for our industry. Two additional plants submitted applications in 2020 and are awaiting review by the OSHA. VPP Star status is the highest designation of OSHA's Voluntary Protection Programs. The achievement recognizes employers and workers who have implemented effective safety and health management systems and maintain injury and illness rates below national Bureau of Labor Statistics averages for their respective industries. These sites are self-sufficient in their ability to control workplace hazards and are reevaluated every three to five years. Additionally, 23 of our power plants and mine locations have adopted a proactive Behavior Based Safety approach to safety which focuses on identifying and providing feedback on at-risk behaviors observed.

In 2020, our Kosse mine site was recognized for the Sentinels of Safety Award by the National Mining Association, the highest distinction for mine safety. This is the second time Kosse has been awarded in the last three years showing the commitment to safety at our mining operations.

10
Table of Contents
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

We recognize the value of having a diverse and inclusive workforce. Our diversity includes all the ways we differ, such as age, gender, ethnicity and physical appearance, as well as underlying differences such as thoughts, styles, religions, nationality, education and numerous other traits. Creating and maintaining an environment where differences are valued and respected enhances our ability to recruit and retain the best talent in the marketplace. As we continue to promote and maintain an environment that fosters creativity, productivity and mutual respect, Vistra becomes the employer of choice by recognizing and using the value that each individual brings to the workplace.

Vistra's diversity is evolving and management is leading by example. Overall, 28% of the Company's workforce is ethnically diverse. Women currently hold 26% of the Company's senior management positions, and ethnically diverse employees represent 23% of senior management. In 2020, the Board of Directors increased diversity as well. Currently three of the ten board members are women, and two of the ten board members are ethnically diverse.

During 2020, we launched multiple initiatives to unlock the full potential of our people - and our company - through our diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. We formalized a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Advisory Council and expanded our Employee Resource Groups (ERG) to promote the appreciation of and communicate awareness of diverse employee groups and communities and their contribution to the overall success of the organization, both internally and externally. New ERGs will join existing ERGs such as Vistra's Women's Information Network, Opportunities for Professional Enrichment and Networking, Parents at Work, Veterans and Toastmasters. Further initiatives were launched to support the education, recruitment and retention of current and future employees, with particular emphasis being placed on driving equal access to opportunities throughout the organization. We contracted with Basic Diversity, Inc. to conduct an assessment of Vistra's diversity, equity and inclusion training needs, and as part of our commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion, we named our first Chief Diversity Officer in January 2021.

Training and Development

We believe the development of employees at all levels is critical to Vistra's current and future success. We have launched key programs to develop leaders at all levels of the organization, including monthly leader meetings for director-level employees focusing on gaining a deeper understanding of Vistra's strategy, developing cross-functional relationships and interacting with senior leadership of the company. Essentials in Leadership provides first time managers with skills to lead organizations in situational leadership, business acumen, identification of communication styles and inclusive communication practices, and exposes them to best practices from across the company. We also revised multiple leadership programs to continue virtually during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Vistra also provides many other training and development programs to help grow and develop employees at every level, including online learning platform courses, learning management system courses, recorded webinars and presentations, self-paced development and employee-specific skill training. Thousands of web-based targeted courses are available to all employees, and the company further supports employees in completing thousands of hours of professional training to support continuing education requirements for their respective professional licenses, including accounting, legal and nuclear. We also support a variety of employee-initiated and -led programs based on demographics, interests and purpose, including Women's Information Network, Opportunities for Professional Enrichment and Networking, Parents at Work, TXU Green Team and Toastmasters.

Employee Benefits

Maintaining attractive benefits and pay are important for recruiting and retaining talent. We are committed to maintaining an equitable compensation structure, including performing annual salary reviews by employee category level within significant locations of operations. Eligible full- and part-time employees are provided access to medical, prescription drug, dental, vision, life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment and long-term disability coverage. Regular full-time employees are eligible for short-term disability benefits, and all employees are eligible for the employee assistance program, parental leave, maternity leave and a 401(k) plan through which the Company matches employee contributions up to 6%.

11
Table of Contents
Wellness

We believe a healthy workforce leads to greater well-being at work and at home. Our healthcare plans are designed to reward employees for getting annual physicals and cancer screenings. Fitness centers in multiple facilities offer cardio equipment, a selection of free weights and exercise mats. Our employee-led wellness team engages our people to get active and support causes that promote healthy living. With support from the company, the wellness team covers the registration costs for employees to participate in more than a dozen running events each year. Additionally, the team hosts quarterly blood drives and recruits participants for our cycling and soccer teams.

Environmental Regulations and Related Considerations


We are subject to extensive environmental regulation by governmental authorities, including the EPA and the environmental regulatory bodies of states in which we operate. The EPA has recently finalized or proposed several regulatory actions establishing new requirements for control of certain emissions from sources, including electricity generation facilities. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for additional discussion of risks posed to us regarding regulatory requirements. See Note 1513 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of litigation related to EPA reviews.


In January 2021, the Biden administration issued a series of Executive Orders, including one titled Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis (the Environment Executive Order) which directed agencies, including the EPA, to review various agency actions promulgated during the prior administration and take action where the previous administration's action conflicts with national objectives. Several of the EPA agency actions discussed below are now subject to this review.

Climate Change


There is a debate nationallyincreasing attention and interest domestically and internationally about global climate change and how greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, such as carbon dioxide (CO2), might contribute to global climate change. GHG emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels, primarily by our coal/lignite-fueled-generation plants, represent the substantial majority of our total GHG emissions. CO2, methane and nitrous oxide are emitted in this combustion process, with CO2 representing the largest portion of these GHG emissions. We estimate that our generation facilities produced approximately 135103 million short tons of CO2 in 2018.2020.


We have already taken or announced significant steps to transition the fuel-mix and reduce the emissions profile of our generation fleet, including:

•Solar Development Projects — In 2018, we began commercial operation of our 180 MW Upton 2 solar facility. In September 2020, we announced the planned development of 668 MW of solar generation facilities in Texas that are expected to begin commercial operations during 2021-2022.
•Battery Energy Storage Projects — In 2018, our 10 MW battery energy storage system (ESS) at our Upton 2 solar facility in Texas commenced operations. Between 2018 and 2020, we announced the planned development of approximately 436 MW of various ESSs in California that are expected to enter commercial operations in 2021-2022. In September 2020, we announced the planned development of a 260 MW ESS in Texas that is expected to enter commercial operation in 2022.
•Acquisition of CCGTs — In 2016 and 2017, we acquired 4,042 MW of CCGTs in Texas. In 2018, we acquired 15,448 MW of CCGTs across various ISOs/RTOs in connection with the Merger.
•Retirements of Coal Generation — In 2018, we retired 4,167 MW of lignite/coal-fueled generation facilities in Texas. In 2019, we retired 2,068 MW of coal-fueled generation facilities in Illinois. We expect to retire an additional 7,486 MW of coal-fueled generation facilities in Illinois, Ohio and Texas no later than year-end 2027.

See Note 3 to the Financial Statements for discussion of our solar and battery energy storage projects and Note 4 to the Financial Statements for discussion of our retirement of generation facilities.

12
Table of Contents
Greenhouse Gas Emissions


In August 2015, the EPA finalized rules to address GHG emissions from new, modified and reconstructed and existing electricity generation units, referred to as the Clean Power Plan, including rules for existing facilities that would establish state-specific emissions rate goals to reduce nationwide CO2 emissions. Various parties (including Luminant) filed petitions for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit Court), and subsequently,. In July 2019, petitioners filed a joint motion to dismiss in January 2016, a coalitionlight of states, industry (including Luminant) and other parties filed applications with the U.S. Supreme Court (Supreme Court) askingEPA's new rule that replaces the Supreme Court stayClean Power Plan, the Affordable Clean Energy rule, whilediscussed below. In September 2019, the D.C. Circuit Court reviews the legalitygranted petitioners' motion to dismiss and dismissed all of the rule for existing plants. In February 2016, the Supreme Court stayed the rule pending the conclusion of legal challenges on the rule before the D.C. Circuit Court and until the Supreme Court disposes of any subsequent petition for review. Oral argument on the merits of the legal challenges to the rule was heard in September 2016 before the entire D.C. Circuit Court, but the D.C. Circuit Court has not issued a decision and the case remains in abeyance due to the EPA's decision to reviewpetitions challenging the Clean Power Plan.Plan as moot.



In October 2017,July 2019, the EPA issuedfinalized a proposed rule that wouldto repeal the Clean Power Plan, with new regulations addressing GHG emissions from existing coal-fueled electric generation units, referred to as the proposedAffordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule. The ACE rule develops emission guidelines that states must use when developing plans to regulate GHG emissions from existing coal-fueled electric generating units. The ACE rule set a deadline of July 2022 for states to submit their plans for regulating GHG emissions from existing facilities. States where we operate coal plants (Texas, Illinois and Ohio) have begun the development of their state plans to comply with the rule. Environmental groups and certain states filed petitions for review of the ACE rule and the repeal focusing on what the EPA believes to be the unlawful nature of the Clean Power Plan in the D.C. Circuit Court, and askingthe D.C. Circuit Court heard argument on those issues in October 2020. In January 2021, the D.C. Circuit Court vacated the ACE rule and remanded the rule to the EPA for public comment onfurther action. In its decision, the D.C. Circuit Court concluded that the EPA's interpretations of its authority underbasis for repealing the Clean Power Plan and adopting the ACE rule was not supported by the Clean Air Act. In December 2017, the EPA published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) soliciting information from the public as the EPA considers proposing a future rule. Vistra Energy submitted comments on the ANPRAdditionally, in February 2018. Vistra Energy submitted comments on the proposed repeal in April 2018. In August 2018, the EPA published a proposed replacement rule called the Affordable Clean Energy rule. We submitted comments on the proposed Affordable Clean Energy rule in October 2018. In December 2018, the EPA issued proposed revisions to the emission standards for new, modified and reconstructed units withunits. Vistra submitted comments dueon that proposed rulemaking in March 2019. While we cannot predictIn January 2021, the outcomeEPA, just prior to the transition to the Biden administration, issued a final rule setting forth a significant contribution finding for the purpose of these rulemakingsregulating GHG emissions from new, modified, or reconstructed electric utility generating units. The final rule exclude sectors from future regulation where GHG emissions make up less than three percent of U.S. GHG emissions. The final rule did not set any specific emission limits for new, modified, or reconstructed electric utility generating units. The ACE rule and related legal proceedings, or estimate a range of reasonably probable costs, if the rulesrule on significant contribution are ultimately implemented or upheld as they were issued, they could have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.subject to the Environment Executive Order discussed above.


State Regulation of GHGs


Many states where we operate generation facilities have, are considering, or are in some stage of implementing, state-only regulatory programs intended to reduce emissions of GHGs from stationary sources as a means of addressing climate change.


Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) — RGGI is a state-driven GHG emission control program that took effect in 2009 and was initially implemented by ten New England and Mid-Atlantic states to reduce CO2 emissions from power plants. The participating RGGI states implemented a cap-and-trade program. Compliance with RGGI can be achieved by reducing emissions, purchasing or trading allowances, or securing offset allowances from an approved offset project. We are required to hold allowances equal to at least 50 percent of emissions in each of the first two years of the three-year control period.


In December 2017, the RGGI states released an updated model rule with changes to the CO2 budget trading program, including an additional 30 percent reduction in the CO2 annual cap by the year 2030, relative to 2020 levels. The RGGI cap on CO2 emissions would decline by 2.275 million tons per year beginning in 2021. Each RGGI state will work to ensure that its program changes are in effect by 2021.


Our generating facilities in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey and New York emitted approximately 8.37 million tons of CO2 during 2018.2020. The spot market price of RGGI allowances required to operate these facilities as of December 31, 20182020 was approximately $5.39$8.11 per allowance. The spot market price of RGGI allowances required to operate our affected facilities during 20192021 was $5.40$8.34 per allowance on February 25, 2019.23, 2021. While the cost of allowances required to operate our RGGI-affected facilities is expected to increase in future years, we expect that the cost of compliance would be reflected in the power market, and the actual impact to gross margin would be largely offset by an increase in revenue.


Massachusetts — In August 2017, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) adopted final rules establishing an annual declining limit on aggregate CO2 emissions from 21 in-state fossil-fueled electricity generation units. The rules establish an allowance trading system under which the annual aggregate electricity generation unit sector cap on CO2 emissions declines from 8.96 million metric tons in 2018 to 1.8 million metric tons in 2050. MassDEP allocated emission allowances to affected facilities for 2018. Beginning in 2019, the allocation process will transitiontransitioned to a competitive auction process. Allowances for 2019 and 2020 will beprocess whereby allowances are partially distributed through a competitive auction process and partially distributed based on the process and schedule established by the rule. Beginning in 2021, all allowances will be distributed through the auction. Limited banking of unused allowances is allowed. The New England Power Generators Association, in which we are a member, and other generators filed complaints in Massachusetts superior court challenging the rules. In January 2018, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decided to review the challenges to MassDEP's electricity generation unit's CO2 rules and transferred the case from the superior court where the rule was upheld. Based on current projections

13
Table of operations for our Massachusetts generating facilities in 2019, we anticipate that allocated allowances will cover CO2 emissions. We expect the rules will have little or no near-term impact on the financial results of our generating facilities in Massachusetts. However, if upheld, the rules would have an adverse impact on the long-term future of these facilities.Contents

Virginia — In January 2018,May 2019, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality issued a proposedfinal rule to adopt a carbon cap-and trade program for fossil-fueled electricity generation units, including our Hopewell facility, beginning in 2020. The proposed program is based on the RGGI proposed 2017 model rule and is intended towill link Virginia to RGGI.RGGI beginning in 2021.


New Jersey — In January 2018, the Governor of New Jersey signed an executive order directing the state's environmental agency and public utilities board to begin the process of rejoining RGGI. In December 2018,RGGI, and New Jersey published two rule proposals that would establish the mechanisms forformally rejoined RGGI in June 2019. In June 2019, New Jersey to rejoin RGGI.adopted two rules that govern New Jersey's reentry into the RGGI auction and distribution of the RGGI auction proceeds.



California — Our assets in California are subject to the California Global Warming Solutions Act, which required the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to develop a GHG emission control program to reduce emissions of GHGs in the state to 1990 levels by 2020. In April 2015, the Governor of California issued an executive order establishing a new statewide GHG reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 to ensure California meets its 2050 GHG reduction target of 80 percent below 1990 levels. The CARB and the Province of Québec held their seventeenth joint allowance auction in November 2018 with current vintage auction allowances selling at a clearing price of $15.31 per metric ton and 2021 auction allowances selling at a clearing price of $15.33 per metric ton. The CARB expects allowance prices to be in the $15 to $30 range by 2020. We have participated in quarterly auctions or in secondary markets, as appropriate, to secure allowances for our affected assets.


In July 2017, California enacted legislation extending its GHG cap-and-trade program through 2030 and the CARB adopted amendments to its cap-and-trade regulations that, among other things, established a framework for extending the program beyond 2020 and linking the program to the new cap-and-trade program in Ontario, Canada beginning in January 2018.


Air Emissions


The Clean Air Act (CAA)


The CAA and comparable state laws and regulations relating to air emissions impose various responsibilities on owners and operators of sources of air emissions, which include requirements to obtain construction and operating permits, pay permit fees, monitor emissions, submit reports and compliance certifications, and keep records. The CAA requires that fossil-fueled electricity generation plants meet certain pollutant emission standards and have sufficient emission allowances to cover sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions and in some regions nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions.


In order to ensure continued compliance with the CAA and related rules and regulations, we utilize various emission reduction technologies. These technologies include flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems, dry sorbent injection (DSI), baghouses and activated carbon injection or mercury oxidation systems on select units and electrostatic precipitators, selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems, low-NOX burners and/or overfire air systems on all units. Additionally, our MISO coal-fueled facilities mainly use low sulfur coal, which, prior to combustion, goes through a refined coal process to further reduce NOX and mercury emissions. In 2018, we received approval to use refined coal at some of our Texas coal-fueled facilities.

Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR)

In July 2011, the EPA issued the CSAPR, compliance with which would have required significant additional reductions of SO2 and NOX emissions from our fossil-fueled generation units. After certain EPA revisions to the rule the CSAPR became effective January 1, 2015. In October 2016, the EPA issued a CSAPR update, which revised the ozone season NOx limits for 22 eastern states, including Texas. Under the CSAPR, our generating facilities in Illinois, Ohio, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia are subject to cap-and-trade programs for ozone-season emissions of NOx from May 1 through September 30 and for annual emissions for SO2 and NOX. Our generating facilities in Texas are subject to the CSAPR NOx ozone season cap-and-trade program. While we cannot predict the outcome of future proceedings related to the CSAPR, based upon our current operating plans, we do not believe that the CSAPR itself will cause any material operational, financial or compliance issues to our business or require us to incur any material compliance costs.


Regional Haze — Reasonable Progress and Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) for Texas


The Regional Haze Program of the CAA establishes "as a national goal the prevention of any future, and the remedying of any existing, impairment of visibility in mandatory class I federal areas which impairment results from man-made pollution." There are two components to the Regional Haze Program. First, states must establish goals for reasonable progress for Class I federal areas within the state and establish long-term strategies to reach those goals and to assist Class I federal areas in neighboring states to achieve reasonable progress set by those states towards a goal of natural visibility by 2064. Second, certain electricity generation units built between 1962 and 1977 are subject to BART standards designed to improve visibility if such units cause or contribute to impairment of visibility in a federal class I area. BART reductions of SO2 and NOX are required either on a unit-by-unit basis or are deemed satisfied by state participation in an EPA-approved regional trading program such as the CSAPR or other approved alternative program.



14
Table of Contents
In January 2016,October 2017, the EPA issued a final rule approving in part and disapproving in part Texas's 2009 State Implementation Plan (SIP) as it relates to the reasonable progress component of the Regional Haze Program and issuing a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP). The EPA's emission limits in the FIP assume additional control equipment for specific lignite/coal-fueled generation units across Texas, including new flue gas desulfurization systems (scrubbers) at seven electricity generation units (including Big Brown Units 1 and 2, Monticello Units 1 and 2 and Coleto Creek) and upgrades to existing scrubbers at seven generation units (including Martin Lake Units 1, 2 and 3, Monticello Unit 3 and Sandow Unit 4).

In March 2016, Luminant and a number of other parties, including the State of Texas, filed petitions for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Fifth Circuit Court) challenging the FIP's Texas requirements. In July 2016, the Fifth Circuit Court granted motions to stay the rule filed by Luminant and the other parties pending final review of the petitions for review. In December 2016, the EPA filed a motion seeking a voluntary remand of the rule back to the EPA for further consideration of Luminant's pending request for administrative reconsideration. In March 2017, the Fifth Circuit Court remanded the rule back to the EPA for reconsideration. The stay of the rule (and the emission control requirements) remains in effect, and the EPA is required to file status reports of its reconsideration every 60 days. The retirements of our Monticello, Big Brown and Sandow 4 plants should have a favorable impact on this rulemaking and litigation. While we cannot predict the outcome of the rulemaking and legal proceedings, or estimate a range of reasonably possible costs, the result could have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.

In September 2017, the EPA signed a final rule addressing BART for Texas electricity generation units, with the rule serving as a partial approval of Texas'sTexas' 2009 SIPState Implementation Plan (SIP) and a partial FIP.Federal Implementation Plan (FIP). For SO2, the rule createsestablished an intrastate Texas emission allowance trading program as a "BART alternative" that operates in a similar fashion to a CSAPR trading program. The program includes 39 generating units (including our Martin Lake, Big Brown, Monticello, Sandow 4, Coleto Creek, Stryker 2 and Graham 2 plants). The compliance obligations in the program started on January 1, 2019, and the identified units receive an annual allowance allocation that is equal to their most recent annual CSAPR SO2 allocation. Cumulatively, our units covered by the program are allocated 100,279 allowances annually. Under the rule, a unit that is listed that does not operate for two consecutive years starting after 2018 would no longer receive allowances after the fifth year of non-operation. We believe the2019. The retirements of our Monticello, Big Brown and Sandow 4 plants will enhancehave enhanced our ability to comply with this BART rule for SO2. For NOX, the rule adoptsadopted the CSAPR's ozone program as BART and for particulate matter, the rule approvesapproved Texas's SIP that determines that no electricity generation units are subject to BART for particulate matter. The National Parks Conservation Association, the Sierra Club and the Environmental Defense FundVarious parties filed a petition challenging the rule in the Fifth Circuit Court as well as a petition for reconsideration filed with the EPA. Luminant intervened on behalf of the EPA in the Fifth Circuit Court action. In March 2018, the Fifth Circuit Court granted a joint motion filed byabated its proceedings pending conclusion of the EPA and the environmental groups involved to abate the Fifth Circuit Court proceedings until the EPA has taken action on the reconsideration petition and concludes theEPA's reconsideration process. In August 2018,2020, the EPA issued a proposedfinal rule affirming the prior BART final rule but also included additional revisions that were proposed in November 2019. In October 2020, environmental groups petitioned for review of this rule in both the D.C. Circuit Court and seeking commentsthe Fifth Circuit Court. Briefing is underway on the proper venue for any challenge to the final rule. As finalized, we expect that proposal, which were due in October 2018. While we cannot predictwill be able to comply with the outcome ofrule. The BART rule is subject to the rulemaking and legal proceedings, we believe the rule, if ultimately implemented or upheld as issued, will not have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.Environment Executive Order discussed above.


Affirmative Defenses During Malfunctions


In February 2013, the EPA proposed a rule requiring certain states to remove SIP exemptions for excess emissions during malfunctions or replace them with an affirmative defense. In May 2015, the EPA finalized its 2013 proposal to extend the EPA's proposed findings of inadequacy to states that have affirmative defense provisions, including Texas. The finala rule impactedrequiring 36 states, including Texas, Illinois and Ohio, in which we operate. The EPA's final rule would require covered states to remove or replace either EPA-approved exemptions or affirmative defense provisions for excess emissions during upset events and unplanned maintenance and startup and shutdown and maintenance events. Several statesevents, referred to as the SIP Call. Various parties (including Luminant, the State of Texas and the State of Ohio) and various industry parties (including Luminant) filed petitions for review of the EPA's final rule, and all of those petitions were consolidated in the D.C. Circuit Court. Before the oral argument was held, inIn April 2017, the D.C. Circuit Court grantedordered the EPA's motioncase to continue oral argument and ordered that the case be held in abeyance withabeyance. In April 2019, the EPA Region 6 proposed a rule to provide status reportswithdraw the SIP Call with respect to the Texas affirmative defense provisions. We submitted comments on that proposed rulemaking in June 2019. In February 2020, the EPA issued the final rule withdrawing the Texas SIP Call. In April 2020, a group of environmental petitioners, including the Sierra Club, filed a petition in the D.C. Circuit Court challenging the EPA's action with respect to Texas. Briefing is currently underway in the challenge to the EPA's action with respect to Texas. In October 2020, the EPA issued new guidance on the EPA's reviewinclusion of startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM) provisions in SIPs, which is intended to supersede the action at 90-day intervals. policy in the multi-state SIP Call. The guidance provides that the SIPs may contain provisions for SSM events if certain conditions are met. The EPA SSM guidance is subject to the Environment Executive Order discussed above.

Illinois Multi-Pollutant Standards (MPS)

In October 2018,August 2019, changes proposed by the EPA partially granted Texas' petition for reconsideration ofIllinois Pollution Control Board to the Texas SIP call. We cannot predictMPS rule, which places NOX, SO2 and mercury emissions limits on our coal plants located in MISO went into effect. Under the timing or outcome of this proceeding, or estimate a range of reasonably possible costs, but implementation ofrevised MPS rule, our allowable SO2 and NOX emissions from the MISO fleet are 48% and 42% lower, respectively, than prior to the rule as finalized could have a material impact onchanges. The revised MPS rule requires the continuous operation of existing selective catalytic reduction (SCR) control systems during the ozone season, requires SCR-controlled units to meet an ozone season NOX emission rate limit, and set an additional, site-specific annual SO2 limit for our resultsJoppa Power Station. Additionally, in 2019, the Company retired its Havana, Hennepin, Coffeen and Duck Creek plants in order to comply with the MPS rule's requirement to retire at least 2,000 MW of operations, liquidity or financial condition.our generation in MISO. See Note 4 to the Financial Statements for information regarding the retirement of these four plants.


National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)


The CAA requires the EPA to regulate emissions of pollutants considered harmful to public health and the environment. The EPA has established NAAQS for six such pollutants, including SO2 and ozone. Each state is responsible for developing a SIP that will attain and maintain the NAAQS. These plans may result in the imposition of emission limits on our facilities.



15
Table of Contents
SO2Designations for Texas —

In November 2016, the EPA finalized its nonattainment designations for counties surrounding our Big Brown, Monticello and Martin Lake generation plants. The final designations require Texas to develop nonattainment plans for these areas. In February 2017, the State of Texas and Luminant filed challenges to the nonattainment designations in the Fifth Circuit Court. Subsequently, in October 2017, the Fifth Circuit Court granted the EPA's motion to hold the case in abeyance considering the EPA's representation that it intended to revisit the nonattainment rule. In December 2017, the TCEQ submitted a petition for reconsideration to the EPA. In addition,August 2019, the EPA issued a proposed Error Correction Rule for all three areas, which, if finalized, would revise its previous nonattainment designations and each area at issue would be designated unclassifiable. In September 2019, we submitted comments in support of the proposed Error Correction Rule. In April 2020, the Sierra Club filed suit to compel the EPA to issue a Finding of Failure to submit an attainment plan with respect to Monticello andthe three areas in Texas. In August 2020, the EPA issued a Finding of Failure for Texas to submit an attainment plan. In September 2020, the EPA proposed a "Clean Data" determination for the areas surrounding the retired Big Brown and Monticello plants, which, if finalized, would redesignate those areas as attainment based on monitoring data supporting an attainment designation. We expect the retirement of those plants should favorably impact our legal challengeTCEQ to develop a SIP for Texas for submittal to the nonattainment designationsEPA in that the nonattainment designations for Freestone County and Titus County are based solely on the Sierra Club modeling, which we dispute, of SO2 emissions from Monticello and Big Brown. Regardless, considering these retirements, the nonattainment designations for those counties are no longer supported. While we cannot predict the outcome of this matter, or estimate a range of reasonably possible costs, the result could have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.2021.


OzoneDesignations —

The EPA issued a final rule in October 2015 lowering the ozone NAAQS from 75 to 70 parts per billion. Various parties have filed lawsuits challengingchallenged the 2015 ozone NAAQS.NAAQS; however, in August 2019, the D.C. Circuit Court generally upheld the 2015 ozone NAAQS but remanded the secondary ozone standard to the EPA for reconsideration. In November 2017, the EPA issued an initial round of area designations for the 2015 ozone NAAQS, designating most areas of the U.S. as attainment/unclassifiable. Several states and other groups have filed lawsuits seeking to compel the EPA to complete designations for all areas of the country. In December 2017, the EPA notified states of expected nonattainment area designations for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. Those areas include areas concerning our Dicks Creek, Miami Fort and Zimmer facilities in Ohio, our Calumet facility in Illinois and our Wise, Ennis and Midlothian facilities in Texas. In June 2018, the EPA finalized these designations as marginal nonattainment areas.


In November 2017, the EPA denied a petition from nine northeastern states to add several states, including Illinois and Ohio, to the Ozone Transport Region. Eight of the northeastern states have filed a petition for judicial review challenging the EPA's action in the D.C. Circuit Court. Briefing inIn April 2019, the D.C. Circuit Court was completed in October 2018, and oral argument was held in November 2018.denied the states' petition for review, upholding the EPA's denial. Additionally, in January 2018, New York and Connecticut filed a lawsuit against the EPA in the Southern District of New York seeking to compel the agency to issue a FIP for the 2008 ozone NAAQS that addresses sources in five upwind states, including Illinois. The plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment on the matter in April 2018, and the court granted that motion in June 2018. As a result, the EPA was required to propose an action to address the 2008 ozone NAAQS by June 29, 2018, and promulgate a final action by December 6, 2018. In January 2019, the plaintiffs informed the district court that the EPA had satisfied its deadlines in accordance with the court's order. However, in January 2019, New York, Connecticut, four other states, and the City of New York filed a separate petition for review in the D.C. Circuit Court challenging the final action the EPA took in December 2018 consistent with the Southern District of New York's order. In October 2019, the D.C. Circuit Court vacated the final rule, and in February 2020, New Jersey, Connecticut, three other states and the City of New York filed a lawsuit against the EPA in the Southern District of New York to compel the EPA to promulgate a fully-compliant FIP to address the 2008 ozone NAAQS in light of the D.C. Circuit Court's vacatur. In July 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ordered the EPA to issue a final rulemaking fully addressing the 2008 ozone NAAQS by March 15, 2021. The EPA proposed its action to address the outstanding 2008 ozone NAAQS obligations in October 2020. Vistra subsidiaries filed comments on that rulemaking in December 2020. These actions are subject to the Environment Executive Order discussed above.


In November 2016, the State of Maryland petitioned the EPA to impose additional NOX emission control requirements on 36 electricity generation units in five upwind states, including our Zimmer facility, that the State alleges are contributing to nonattainment with the 2008 ozone NAAQS in Maryland. In the fall of 2017, Maryland and several environmental groups filed lawsuits against the EPA seeking to compel the Agency to act on the State's petition. In October 2018, the EPA took final action denying the Maryland petition. While we cannot predict the outcomepetition, and Maryland filed a petition for review of the judicial proceedings, givenEPA's denial in the D.C. Circuit Court. In May 2020, the D.C. Circuit Court largely upheld the EPA's denial of Maryland's petition but granted Maryland's petition with respect to the EPA's treatment of sources with non-catalytic controls and remanded the issue to the EPA. Given that the Zimmer facility utilizes SCR technology to control NOX emissions, we do not believe that the result of these proceedingsEPA's action on remand could cause a material adverse impact on our future financial results.


16
Table of Contents
In March 2018, the State of New York petitioned the EPA to find that emissions from hundreds of sources in nine states, including Illinois, Multi-Pollutant Standards (MPS)

In 2007, our MISO coal-fueled generation facilities electedOhio, Virginia and West Virginia are significantly contributing to demonstrate complianceNew York's nonattainment and interfering with the Illinois MPS, which require compliance with NOX, SO2 and mercury emissions limits. We are in compliance with the MPS. In October 2017, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) filed a proposed rule with the Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB) that would amend the MPS rule by replacing the two separate group-wide annual emission rate limits that currently apply to our eight downstate Illinois coal-fueled stations with tonnage limits for both SO2 (annual) and NOX (annual and seasonal) that apply to the eight stations as a single group. Under the MPS proposal, allowable annual emissions of SO2 and NOX would be 32 percent lower than under the current rule. All other federal and state air quality regulations, including health-based standards, would remain unchanged and in place. The proposed rule also would impose new requirements to ensure the continuous operation of existing SCR control systems during the ozone season, require SCR-controlled units to meet an ozone season NOX emission rate limit, and set an additional, site-specific annual SO2 limit for our Joppa Power Station. We are supportiveNew York's maintenance of the proposed rule as it would provide operational flexibility to our MISO fleet while also providing a number of regulatory2008 and environmental benefits. IPCB held five hearings on the rule and we expect it to be finalized in 2019.


New Source Review and CAA Matters

New Source Review — Since 1999,2015 ozone NAAQS. On October 18, 2019, the EPA has engaged in a nationwide enforcement initiative to determine whether coal-fueled power plants failed to comply with the requirements of thetook final action denying New Source Review (NSR) andYork's petition. On October 29, 2019, New Source Performance Standard provisions under the CAA when the plants implemented changes. The EPA's NSR initiative focuses on whether projects performed at power plants triggered various permitting requirements, including the need to install pollution control equipment.

In August 2013, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), acting as the attorneys for the EPA, filed a civil enforcement lawsuit against Luminant in federal district court in Dallas, alleging violations of the CAA, including its NSR standards, at our Big Brown and Martin Lake generation facilities. The lawsuit requests (i) the maximum civil penalties available under the CAA to the government of up to $32,500 to $37,500 per day for each alleged violation, depending on the date of the alleged violation, and (ii) injunctive relief, including an order to apply for pre-construction permits which may require the installation of best available control technology at the affected units. In August 2015, the district court granted Luminant's motion to dismiss seven of the nine claims asserted by the EPA in the lawsuit.

In January 2017, the EPA dismissed its two remaining claims with prejudiceYork, New Jersey and the district court entered final judgment in Luminant's favor. In March 2017, the EPA and the Sierra Club appealed the final judgment to the Fifth Circuit Court. After the parties filed their respective briefs in the Fifth Circuit Court, the appeal was argued before the Fifth Circuit Court in March 2018. In October 2018, the Fifth Circuit Court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the district court. The Fifth Circuit Court's decision held that the district court properly dismissed allCity of the civil penalties as time-barred. The Fifth Circuit Court further held that the grounds cited by the district court did not support dismissal of the injunctive relief claims at this early stage of the case and remanded the case back to the district court for further consideration. In November 2018, weNew York filed a petition for rehearing en banc on two issues andreview of the EPA's response to that petition is due in February 2019. We believe that we have complied with all requirementsdenial of the CAASection 126 petition. In July 2020, the D.C. Circuit Court vacated the EPA's denial and intendremanded the action to continue to vigorously defend against the remaining allegations. An adverse outcome could require substantial capital expenditures that cannot be determined at this time or retirement of the remaining plant at issue, Martin Lake. The retirement of the Big Brown plant should have a favorable impact on this litigation. We cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings, including the financial effects, if any.

Zimmer NOVs — In December 2014, the EPA issued a notice of violation (NOV) alleging violation of opacity standards at the Zimmer facility. The EPA previously had issued NOVs to Zimmer in 2008 and 2010 alleging violations of the CAA, the Ohio State Implementation Plan and the station's air permits including standards applicable to opacity, sulfur dioxide, sulfuric acid mist and heat input. The NOVs remain unresolved. We are unable to predict the outcome of these matters.for further proceedings.

Edwards CAA Citizen Suit — In April 2013, environmental groups filed a CAA citizen suit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois alleging violations of opacity and particulate matter limits at our MISO segment's Edwards facility. In August 2016, the district court granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on certain liability issues. We filed a motion seeking interlocutory appeal of the court's summary judgment ruling. In February 2017, the appellate court denied our motion for interlocutory appeal. The parties completed briefing on motions for summary judgment on remedy issues in October 2018. In January 2019, the court canceled the bench trial scheduled for March 2019 and denied the parties' motions for summary judgment on remedy issues. In February 2019, the court issued an order that anticipates a trial date at the end of September 2019. We dispute the allegations and will defend the case vigorously. We are unable to predict the outcome of these matters.

Ultimate resolution of any of these CAA matters could have a material adverse impact on our future financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. A resolution could result in increased capital expenditures for the installation of pollution control equipment, increased operations and maintenance expenses, and penalties, or could result in an order or a decision to retire these plants. While we cannot predict the outcome of these legal proceedings, or estimate a range of costs, they could have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.


Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR)/Groundwater


The combustion of coal to generate electric power creates large quantities of ash and byproducts that are managed at power generation facilities in dry form in landfills and in wet form in surface impoundments. Each of our coal-fueled plants has at least one CCR surface impoundment. At present, CCR is regulated by the states as solid waste.



Coal Combustion Residuals


The EPA's CCR rule, which took effect in October 2015, establishes minimum federal requirements for the construction, retrofitting, operation and closure of, and corrective action with respect to, existing and new CCR landfills and surface impoundments, as well as inactive CCR surface impoundments. The requirements include location restrictions, structural integrity criteria, groundwater monitoring, operating criteria, liner design criteria, closure and post-closure care, recordkeeping and notification. The rule allows existing CCR surface impoundments to continue to operate for the remainder of their operating life, but generally would require closure (i.e., cessation of placement of CCR material and corrective action necessary to reach the standards provided in the CCR rule and applicable state rules) if groundwater monitoring demonstrates that the CCR surface impoundment is responsible for exceedances of groundwater quality protection standards or the CCR surface impoundment does not meet location restrictions or structural integrity criteria. The deadlines for beginning and completing closure vary depending on several factors. Several petitions for judicial review of the CCR rule were filed. The Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act (the WIIN Act), which was enacted in December 2016, provides for EPA review and approval of state CCR permit programs.


In July 2018, the EPA published a final rule, which became effective in August 2018, that amends certain provisions of the CCR rule that the agency issued in 2015. TheAmong other changes, the 2018 revisions extendextended closure deadlines to October 31, 2020, related to the aquifer location restriction and groundwater monitoring requirements. The 2018 revisions also (1) establish groundwater protection standards for cobalt, lithium, molybdenum and lead (2) allow authorized state programs to waive groundwater monitoring requirements when there is a demonstration of no potential for contaminant migration, and (3) allow the permitting authority to issue certificationsAlso, in lieu of a qualified professional engineer. The 2018 revisions became effective in August 2018, and we are continuing to evaluate the impact on our CCR facilities. Also, on August 21, 2018, the D.C. Circuit Court issued a decision that vacates and remands certain provisions of the 2015 CCR rule.rule, including an applicability exemption for legacy impoundments. In December 2019, the EPA issued a proposed rule containing a revised closure deadline for unlined CCR impoundments and new procedures for seeking extensions of that revised closure deadline. We filed comments on the proposal in January 2020. In August 2020, the EPA issued a rule finalizing the December 2019 proposal, establishing a deadline of April 11, 2021 to cease receipt of waste and initiate closure at unlined CCR impoundments. The EPAfinal rule allows a generation plant to seek the EPA's approval to extend this deadline if no alternative disposal capacity is expectedavailable and either a conversion to undertake further revisions to itscomply with the CCR regulations in responserule is underway or retirement will occur by either 2023 or 2028 (depending on the size of the impoundment at issue). Prior to the D.C. Circuit Court's ruling.November 2020 deadline, we submitted applications to the EPA requesting compliance extensions under both conversion and retirement scenarios. In October 2018, theNovember 2020, environmental groups petitioned for review of this rule that extends certain closure deadlines to 2020 was challenged in the D.C. Circuit Court. In December 2018, the EPACourt, and petitioners filed cross-motions, with the EPA seeking remand without vacatur and petitioners seeking a partial stay or vacatur of the rule. We have intervened in the litigation andVistra subsidiaries filed a motion to intervene in support of the EPA. Briefing onEPA in December 2020. Also, in November 2020, the cross-motions is ongoing. WhileEPA finalized a rule that would allow an alternative liner demonstration for certain qualifying facilities. In November 2020, we cannot predictsubmitted an alternate liner demonstration for one CCR unit at Martin Lake. In October 2020, the impactsEPA published an advanced notice of theseproposed rulemaking requesting information to inform the EPA in the development of a rule revisions (including whether and if so how the states in which we operate will utilize the authority delegatedto address legacy impoundments that existed prior to the states through2015 CCR regulation as required by the revisions), or estimate a range of reasonably possible costs relatedAugust 2018 D.C. Circuit Court decision. We filed comments on this proposal in February 2021. The rules on revised closure deadlines and alternative liner demonstrations are subject to these revisions, the changes that result from these revisions could have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.Environment Executive Order discussed above.


MISO Segment — In 2012, the IEPAIllinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) issued violation notices alleging violations of groundwater standards onsite at our Baldwin and Vermilion facilities' CCR surface impoundments. InThese violation notices remain unresolved; however, in 2016, the IEPA approved our closure and post-closure care plans for the Baldwin old east, east, and west fly ash CCR surface impoundments. We are working towards implementation of those closure plans.


17
Table of Contents
At our retired Vermilion facility, which was not subject to the EPA's 2015 CCR rule until the aforementioned D.C. Circuit Court decision in August 2018, court decision, we submitted proposed corrective action plans involving closure of two CCR surface impoundments (i.e., the old east and the north impoundments) to the IEPA in 2012, withand we submitted revised plans submitted in 2014. In May 2017, in response to a request from the IEPA for additional information regarding the closure of these Vermilion surface impoundments, we agreed to perform additional groundwater sampling and closure options and riverbank stabilizing options. By letter dated January 31,In May 2018, Prairie Rivers Network provided 60-day notice of its intent to sue our subsidiary Dynegy Midwest Generation, LLC under the federal Clean Water Act for alleged unauthorized discharges from the surface impoundments at our Vermilion facility and alleged related violations of the facility's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. Prairie Rivers Network filed a citizen suit in May 2018,federal court in Illinois against our subsidiary Dynegy Midwest Generation, LLC (DMG), alleging violations of the Clean Water Act for alleged unauthorized discharges. In August 2018, we filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. In November 2018, the district court granted our motion to dismiss and judgment was entered in our favor. Plaintiffs have appealed the judgment to the U.SU.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. We disputeSeventh Circuit and argument was heard in November 2020. In April 2019, PRN also filed a complaint against DMG before the allegationsIllinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB), alleging that groundwater flows allegedly associated with the ash impoundments at the Vermilion site have resulted in exceedances both of surface water standards and will vigorously defend our position.Illinois groundwater standards dating back to 1992. This matter is in the very early stages.


In 2012, the IEPA issued violation notices alleging violations of groundwater standards at the Newton and Coffeen facilities' CCR surface impoundments. We are addressing these CCR surface impoundments in accordance with the federal CCR rule. In June 2018, the IEPA issued a violation notice for alleged seep discharges claimed to be coming from the surface impoundments at our retired Vermilion facility.facility and that notice has since been referred to the Illinois Attorney General.


In December 2018, the Sierra Club filed a complaint with the IPCB alleging the disposal and storage of coal ash at the Coffeen, Edwards, and Joppa generation facilities are causing exceedances of the applicable groundwater standards.

In July 2019, coal ash disposal and storage legislation in Illinois was enacted. The legislation addresses state requirements for the proper closure of coal ash ponds in the state of Illinois. The law tasks the IEPA and the IPCB to set up a series of guidelines, rules and permit requirements for closure of ash ponds. In March 2020, the IEPA issued its proposed rule, and we expect the rulemaking process should be completed by early 2021. Under the proposed rule, coal ash impoundment owners would be required to submit a closure alternative analysis to the IEPA for the selection of the best method for coal ash remediation at a particular site. The proposed rule does not mandate closure by removal at any site. Public hearings for the proposed rule were held in August 2020 and September 2020. We disputeexpect that the allegations andrule will vigorously defend our position.be finalized by March 2021.



If remediationFor all of the above matters, if certain corrective action measures, concerningincluding groundwater treatment or removal of ash, are necessaryrequired at any of our coal-fueled facilities, we may incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. At this time, in part because ofUntil the revisions to the CCR rule thatIllinois coal ash rulemaking are finalized and we undertake further site-specific evaluations required by each program we will not know the EPA published in July 2018 and the D.C. Circuit Court's vacatur and remand of certain provisions of the EPA's 2015 CCR rule, we cannot reasonably estimate the costs, orfull range of costs of groundwater remediation, if any, that ultimately may be required.required under those rules. However, the currently anticipated CCR surface impoundment and landfill closure costs, as determined byreflected in our existing ARO balances, reflect the costs of closure methods that our operations and environmental services teams believe are reflected in our AROs.appropriate and protective of the environment for each location.


Water


The EPA and the environmental regulatory bodies of states in which we operate have jurisdiction over the diversion, impoundment and withdrawal of water for cooling and other purposes and the discharge of wastewater (including storm water) from our facilities. We believe our facilities are presently in material compliance with applicable federal and state requirements relating to these activities. We believe we hold all required permits relating to these activities for facilities in operation and have applied for or obtained necessary permits for facilities under construction. We also believe we can satisfy the requirements necessary to obtain any required permits or renewals.


Cooling Water Intake Structures — Clean Water Act Section 316(b) regulations pertaining to existing water intake structures at large generation facilities became effective in 2014. This provision generally requires that the location, design, construction and capacity of cooling water intake structures reflect the best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impacts. Although the rule does not mandate a certain control technology, it does require site-specific assessments of technology feasibility on a case-by-case basis at the state level.


18
Table of Contents
At this time, we estimate the cost of our compliance with the cooling water intake structure rule willto be approximately $16 million, with the majority of the expenditures in 2020 through 2023minimal at a group of our Illinois generation facilities.plants due to the planned retirements of those plants by 2027. Our estimate could change materially depending upon a variety of factors, including site-specific determinations made by states in implementing the rule, the results of impingement and entrainment studies required by the rule, the results of site-specific engineering studies and the outcome of litigation concerning the rule.rule and potential plant retirements.


Effluent Limitation Guidelines (ELGs) — In November 2015, the EPA revised the ELGs for steam electricity generation facilities, which will impose more stringent standards (as individual permits are renewed) for wastewater streams, such as flue gas desulfurization (FGD), fly ash, bottom ash and flue gas mercury control.control wastewaters. Various parties filed petitions for review of the ELG rule, and the petitions were consolidated in the Fifth Circuit Court. In April 2017, the EPA granted petitions requesting reconsideration of the ELG final rule issued in 2015 and administratively stayed the ELG rule's compliance date deadlines pending ongoing judicialdeadlines. In August 2017, the EPA announced that its reconsideration of the ELG rule would be limited to a review of the rule. The legal challenges pertainingeffluent limitations applicable to FGD and bottom ash transport water, flue gas desulfurization wastewaterwastewaters and gasification wastewater have been suspended while the EPA reconsiders the rules.

The EPA issued a final rule in September 2017 postponingagency subsequently postponed the earliest compliance dates in the ELG rule for the application of effluent limitations for FGD and bottom ash transport water and flue-gas desulfurization wastewater by two years,wastewaters from November 1, 2018 to November 1, 2020.

Given Based on these administrative developments, the Fifth Circuit Court agreed to sever and hold in abeyance challenges to effluent limitations. The remainder of the case proceeded, and in April 2019 the Fifth Circuit Court vacated and remanded portions of the EPA's decisionELG rule pertaining to reconsidereffluent limitations for legacy wastewater and leachate. In November 2019, the EPA issued a proposal that would extend the compliance deadline for FGD wastewater to no later than December 31, 2025 and maintains the December 31, 2023 compliance date for bottom ash transport water. The proposal also creates new sub-categories of facilities with more flexible FGD compliance options, including a retirement exemption to 2028 and a low utilization boiler exemption. The proposed rule also modified some of the FGD final effluent limitations. We filed comments on the proposal in January 2020. The EPA published the final rule in October 2020. The final rule extends the compliance date for both FGD and bottom ash transport water and flue gas desulfurization wastewater provisionsto no later than December 2025, as negotiated with the state permitting agency. Additionally, the final rule allows for a retirement exemption that exempts facilities certifying that units will retire by December 2028 provided certain effluent limitations are met. Notification to the state agency on the retirement exemption is due by October 2021. In November 2020, environmental groups petitioned for review of the new ELG rule, the rule postponing the ELG rule's earliest compliance dates for those provisions,revisions, and the intertwined relationshipVistra subsidiaries filed a motion to intervene in support of the ELGEPA in December 2020. The final rule withis subject to the CCR ruleEnvironment Executive Order discussed below, which is also being reconsidered by the EPA, as well as pending legal challenges concerning both rules, substantial uncertainty exists regarding our projected capital expenditures for ELG compliance, including the timing of such expenditures. While we cannot predict the outcome of this matter, or estimate a range of costs, it could have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.above.


Radioactive Waste


The nuclear industry has developed ways to store used nuclear fuel on site at nuclear generation facilities, primarily using dry cask storage, since there are no facilities for reprocessing or disposal of used nuclear fuel currently in operation in the U.S. Luminant stores its used nuclear fuel on-site in storage pools or dry cask storage facilities and believes its on-site used nuclear fuel storage capability is sufficient for the foreseeable future.



19
Environmental Capital Expenditures
Table of Contents

Item 1A.RISK FACTORS
Capital expenditures for
Summary of Risk Factors

The following summarizes the principal factors that make an investment in our environmental projects totaled $13 millioncompany speculative or risky, all of which are more fully described in the year ended December 31, 2018Risk Factors section below. This summary should be read in conjunction with the Risk Factors section and are expectedshould not be relied upon as an exhaustive summary of the material risks facing our business. The following factors could result in harm to total approximately $35 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 for environmental control equipment to comply with regulatory requirements.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2018 Estimated 2019
ERCOT$9
 $6
PJM3
 14
MISO1
 14
CAISO—
 1
Total$13
 $35



Item 1A.    RISK FACTORS

Important factors, in addition to others specifically addressed in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, or could cause results or outcomes to differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statement in this Annual Report, are described below. There may be further risks and uncertainties that are not currently known or that are not currently believed to be material that may adversely affect our business, results of operations, liquidity, financial conditioncash flows, and prospects, and the market price of our common stock in the future. The realization of any of these factors could cause investors in our common stock to lose all or a substantial portion of their investment.among other impacts:


Market, Financial and Economic Risks


•Our revenues, results of operations and operating cash flows generally may be impactedare affected by price fluctuations in the wholesale power market and other market factors beyond our control.


We are not guaranteed any rate of return on capital investments in our businesses. We conduct integrated power generation and retail electricity activities, focusing on power generation, wholesale electricity sales and purchases, retail sales of electricity and services to end users and commodity risk management. Our wholesale and retail businesses are to some extent countercyclical in nature, particularly for the wholesale power and ancillary services supplied to the retail business. However, we do have a wholesale power position that exceeds the overall load requirements of our retail business and is subject to wholesale power price moves. As a result, our revenues, results of operations and operating cash flows depend in large part upon wholesale market prices for electricity, natural gas, uranium, lignite, coal, fuel and transportation in our regional markets and other competitive markets and upon prevailing retail electricity rates, which may be impacted by, among other things, actions of regulatory authorities. Market prices for power, capacity, ancillary services, natural gas, coal and oil are unpredictable and may fluctuate substantially over relatively short periods of time. Unlike most other commodities, electric power can only be stored on a very limited basis and generally must be produced concurrently with its use. As a result, power prices are subject to significant volatility due to supply and demand imbalances, especially in the day-ahead and spot markets. Demand for electricity can fluctuate dramatically, creating periods of substantial under- or over-supply. Over-supply can also occur as a result of the construction of new power plants, as we have observed in recent years. During periods of over-supply, electricity prices might be depressed. Also, at times there may be political pressure, or pressure from regulatory authorities with jurisdiction over wholesale and retail energy commodity and transportation rates, to impose price limitations, bidding rules and other mechanisms to address volatility and other issues in these markets.

The majority of our facilities operate as "merchant" facilities without long-term power sales agreements. As a result, we largely sell electric energy, capacity and ancillary services into the wholesale energy spot market or into other wholesale and retail power markets on a short-term basis and are not guaranteed any rate of return on our capital investments. Consequently, there can be no assurance that we will be able to sell any or all of the electric energy, capacity or ancillary services from those facilities at commercially attractive rates or that our facilities will be able to operate profitably. We depend, in large part, upon prevailing market prices for power, capacity and fuel. Given the volatility of commodity power prices, to the extent we do not secure long-term power sales agreements for the output of our power generation facilities, our revenues and profitability will be subject to volatility, and our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

•We purchase natural gas, coal, fuel oil, and nuclear fuel for our generation facilities, and higher than expected fuel costs or volatilitydisruptions in these fuel markets may have an adverse impact on, our costs, revenues, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.


We rely on natural gas, coal and oil to fuel the majority of our power generation facilities. Delivery of these fuels to the facilities is dependent upon the continuing financial viability of contractual counterparties as well as upon the infrastructure (including rail lines, rail cars, barge facilities, roadways, riverways and natural gas pipelines) available to serve each generation facility. As a result, we are subject to the risks of disruptions or curtailments in the production of power at our generation facilities if no fuel is available at any price or if a counterparty fails to perform or if there is a disruption in the fuel delivery infrastructure.


•We have sold forward a substantial portion of our expected power sales in the next one to two years in order to lock in long-term prices. In order to hedge our obligations under these forward power sales contracts, we have entered into long-termretired, announced planned retirements, and short-term contracts for the purchase and delivery of fuel. Many of the forward power sales contracts do not allow us to pass through changes in fuel costs or discharge the power sale obligations in the case of a disruption in fuel supply due to force majeure events or the default of a fuel supplier or transporter. Fuel costs (including diesel, natural gas, lignite, coal and nuclear fuel) may be volatile, and the wholesale price for electricity may not change at the same rate as changes in fuel costs, and disruptions in our fuel supplies may therefore require us to find alternative fuel sources at higher costs, to find other sources of power to deliver to counterparties at a higher cost, or to pay damages to counterparties for failure to deliver power as contracted. In addition, we purchase and sell natural gas and other energy related commodities, and volatility in these markets may affect costs incurred in meeting obligations. Further, any changes in the costs of coal, fuel oil, natural gas or transportation rates and changes in the relationship between such costs and the market prices of power will affect our financial results. If we are unable to procure fuel for physical delivery at prices we consider favorable, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

We also buy significant quantities of fuel on a short-term or spot market basis. Prices for all of our fuels fluctuate, sometimes rising or falling significantly over a relatively short period of time. The price we can obtain for the sale of energy may not rise at the same rate, or may not rise at all, to match a rise in fuel or delivery costs. This may have a material adverse effect on our financial performance. Volatility in market prices for fuel and electricity may result from, among other factors:

demand for energy commodities and general economic conditions;
volatility in commodity prices and the supply of commodities, including but not limited to natural gas, coal and oil;
volatility in market heat rates;
volatility in coal and rail transportation prices;
volatility in nuclear fuel and related enrichment and conversion services;
disruption or other constraints or inefficiencies of electricity, gas or coal transmission or transportation;
severe or unexpected weather conditions, including drought and limitations on access to water;
seasonality;
changes in electricity and fuel usage resulting from conservation efforts, changes in technology or other factors;
illiquidity in the wholesale electricity or other commodity markets;
transmission or transportation disruptions, constraints, inoperability or inefficiencies, or other changes in power transmission infrastructure;
development and availability of new fuels, new technologies and new forms of competition for the production and storage of power, including competitively priced alternative energy sources or storage;
changes in market structure and liquidity;
changes in the way we operate our facilities, including curtailed operation due to market pricing, environmental regulations and legislation, safety or other factors;
changes in generation capacity or efficiency;
outages or otherwise reduced output from our generation facilities or those of our competitors;
changes in electric capacity, including the addition of new supplies of power as a result of the development of new plants, expansion of existing plants, the continued operation of uneconomic power plants due to federal, state or local subsidies, or additional transmission capacity;
our creditworthiness and liquidity and the willingness of fuel suppliers and transporters to do business with us;
changes in the credit risk or payment practices of market participants;
changes in production and storage levels of natural gas, lignite, coal, uranium, diesel and other refined products;
natural disasters, wars, sabotage, terrorist acts, embargoes and other catastrophic events, and
changes in law, including judicial decisions, federal, state and local energy, environmental and other regulation and legislation.

We may be forced to retire or idle additional, underperforming generation units which could result in significant costs and have an adverse effect on our operating results.


During 2018, we retired our Monticello, Sandow 4, Sandow 5, Big Brown, Killen, Stuart and Northeastern units. A sustained decrease in the financial results from, or the value of, our generation units ultimately could result in the retirement or idling of certain other generation units. In recent years, we have operated certain of our lignite- and coal-fueled generation assets only during parts of the year that have higher electricity demand and, therefore, higher related wholesale electricity prices.


•Our assets or positions cannot be fully hedged against changes in commodity prices and market heat rates, and hedging transactions may not work as planned or hedge counterparties may default on their obligations.


Our hedging activities do not fully protect us against the risks associated with•Competition, changes in commodity prices, most notably electricity and natural gas prices, because of the expected useful life of our generation assets and the size of our position relative to the duration of available markets for various hedging activities. Generally, commodity markets that we participate in to hedge our exposure to electricity prices and heat rates have limited liquidity after two to three years. Further, our ability to hedge our revenues by utilizing cross-commodity hedging strategies with natural gas hedging instruments is generally limited to a duration of four to five years. To the extent we have unhedged positions, fluctuating commodity prices and/or market heat rates can materially impact our results of operations, cash flows, liquidity and financial condition, either favorably or unfavorably.

To manage our financial exposure related to commodity price fluctuations, we routinely enter into contracts to hedge portions of purchase and sale commitments, fuel requirements and inventories of natural gas, lignite, coal, diesel fuel, uranium and refined products, and other commodities, within established risk management guidelines. As part of this strategy, we routinely utilize fixed-price forward physical purchase and sale contracts, futures, financial swaps and option contracts traded in over-the-counter markets or on exchanges. Although we devote a considerable amount of time and effort to the establishment of risk management procedures, as well as the ongoing review of the implementation of these procedures, the procedures in place may not always function as planned and cannot eliminate all the risks associated with these activities. For example, we hedge the expected needs of our wholesale and retail customers, but unexpected changes due to weather, natural disasters, consumer behavior, market constraints or other factors could cause us to purchase electricity to meet unexpected demand in periods of high wholesale market prices or resell excess electricity into the wholesale market in periods of low prices. As a result of these and other factors, risk management decisions may have a material adverse effect on us.

Based on economic and other considerations, we may not be able to, or we may decide not to, hedge the entire exposure of our operations from commodity price risk. To the extent we do not hedge against commodity price risk and applicable commodity prices change in ways adverse to us, we could be materially and adversely affected. To the extent we do hedge against commodity price risk, those hedges may ultimately prove to be ineffective.

With the tightening of credit markets that began in 2008 and the expansion of regulatory oversight through various financial reforms, there has been a decline in the number of market participants in the wholesale energy commodities markets, resulting in less liquidity. Notably, participation by financial institutions and other intermediaries (including investment banks) in such markets has declined. Extended declines in market liquidity could adversely affect our ability to hedge our financial exposure to desired levels.

To the extent we engage in hedging and risk management activities, we are exposed to the credit risk that counterparties that owe us money, energy or other commodities as a result of these activities will not perform their obligations to us. Should the counterparties to these arrangements fail to perform, we could be forced to enter into alternative hedging arrangements or honor the underlying commitment at then-current market prices. Additionally, our counterparties may seek bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 or liquidation under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. Our credit risk may be exacerbated to the extent collateral held by us cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount due to us. There can be no assurance that any such losses or impairments to the carrying value of our financial assets would not materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In such event, we could incur losses or forgo expected gains in addition to amounts, if any, already paid to the counterparties. Market participants in the RTOs and ISOs in which we operate are also exposed to risks that another market participant may default on its obligations to pay such RTO or ISO for electricity or services taken, in which case such costs, to the extent not offset by posted security and other protections available to such RTO or ISO, may be allocated to various non-defaulting RTO or ISO market participants, including us.


We do not apply hedge accounting to our commodity derivative transactions, which may cause increased volatility in our quarterly and annual financial results.

We engage in economic hedging activities to manage our exposure related to commodity price fluctuations through the use of financial and physical derivative contracts for commodities. These derivatives are accounted for in accordance with GAAP, which requires that we record all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value with changes in fair value immediately recognized in earnings as unrealized gains or losses. GAAP permits an entity to designate qualifying derivative contracts as normal purchases and sales. If designated, those contracts are not recorded at fair value. GAAP also permits an entity to designate qualifying derivative contracts in a hedge accounting relationship. If a hedge accounting relationship is used, a significant portion of the changes in fair value is not immediately recognized in earnings. We have chosen not to apply hedge accounting to our commodity contracts and we have chosen to elect normal purchase normal sales in only limited cases, such as our retail sales contracts. As a result, our quarterly and annual financial results in accordance with GAAP are subject to significant fluctuations caused by changes in forward commodity prices.

Competition, change in market structure, and/or state or federal interference in the wholesale and retail power markets, together with subsidized generation, may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.


Our generation and competitive retail businesses rely on a competitive wholesale marketplace. The competitive wholesale marketplace may be undermined by changes in market structure and out-of-market subsidies provided by federal or state entities, including bailouts of uneconomic plants, imports of power from Canada, renewable mandates or subsidies, as well as out-of-market payments to new generators.

Our power generation business competes with other non-utility generators, regulated utilities, unregulated subsidiaries of regulated utilities, other energy service companies and financial institutions in the sale of electric energy, capacity and ancillary services, as well as in the procurement of fuel, transmission and transportation services. Moreover, aggregate demand for power may be met by generation capacity based on several competing technologies, as well as power generating facilities fueled by alternative or renewable energy sources, including hydroelectric power, synthetic fuels, solar, wind, wood, geothermal, waste heat and solid waste sources. Regulatory initiatives designed to enhance and/or subsidize renewable generation increases competition from these types of facilities and out-of-market subsidies to existing or new generation can undermine the competitive wholesale marketplace, which can lead to premature retirement of existing facilities, including those owned by us.

We also compete against other energy merchants on the basis of our relative operating skills, financial position and access to credit sources. Electric energy customers, wholesale energy suppliers and transporters often seek financial guarantees, credit support such as letters of credit and other assurances that their energy contracts will be satisfied. Companies with which we compete may have greater resources or experience in these areas. Over time, some of our plants may become unable to compete because of subsidized generation, including public utility commission supported power purchase agreements, and the construction of new plants. Such new plants could have a number of advantages including: more efficient equipment, newer technology that could result in fewer emissions or more advantageous locations on the electric transmission system. Additionally, these competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new laws and regulations because of the newer technology utilized in their facilities or the additional resources derived from owning more efficient facilities.

Other factors may contribute to increased competition in wholesale power markets. New forms of capital and competitors have entered the industry, including financial investors who perceive that asset values are at levels below their true replacement value. As a result, a number of generation facilities in the U.S. are now owned by lenders and investment companies. Furthermore, mergers and asset reallocations in the industry could create powerful new competitors. Under any scenario, we anticipate that we will face competition from numerous companies in the industry. Certain federal and state entities in jurisdictions in which we operate have either enacted or are considering regulations or legislation to subsidize otherwise uneconomic plants and attempt to incent the development of new renewable resources as well as increase energy efficiency investments. Continued subsidies (or increases thereto) to our competitors could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.


In addition, our retail marketing efforts compete for customers in a competitive environment, which impacts the margins that we can earn on the volumes we are able to serve. Further, with retail competition, it is easier for residential customers where we serve load to switch to and from competitive electricity generation suppliers for their energy needs. The volatility and uncertainty that results from such mobility may have material adverse effects on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. For example, if fewer customers switch to another supplier than anticipated, the load we must serve will be greater than anticipated and, if market prices of fuel have increased, our costs will increase more than expected due to the need to go to the market to cover the incremental supply obligation. If more customers switch to another supplier than anticipated, the load we must serve will be lower than anticipated and, if market prices of electricity have decreased, our operating results could suffer.

•Our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected if energy market participants continue to construct additionalnew generation facilities (i.e., new-build) or expand or enhance existing generation facilities despite relatively low power prices and such additional generation capacity results in a reduction in wholesale power prices.


Given the overall attractiveness of certain of the markets in which we operate•The agreements and certain tax benefits associated with renewable energy, among other matters, energy market participants have continued to construct new generation facilities (i.e., new-build) or invest in enhancements or expansions of existing generation facilities despite relatively low wholesale power prices. If this market dynamic continues, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected if such additional generation capacity results in an over-supply of electricity that causes a reduction in wholesale power prices.

Unauthorized hedging and related activities by our employees could result in significant losses.

We have various internal policies, processes, and controls designed to monitor hedging activities and positions. These policies, processes, and controls are designed, in part, to prevent unauthorized purchases or sales of products by our employees or alert our risk management teams of any trades that have not been entered into our risk management systems. We cannot assure, however, that these steps will detect and prevent inaccurate reporting and all potential violations of our risk management policies, processes, and controls, particularly if deception or other intentional misconduct is involved. A significant policy violation that is not detected could result in a substantial financial loss.

Our risk management policies cannot fully eliminate the risk associated with our commodity hedging activities.

Our operations and other commodity hedging activities expose us to risks of commodity price movements. We attempt to manage this exposure by entering into commodity hedging transactions and establishing risk management policies and procedures. These risk management procedures may not work as planned and cannot eliminate all risks associated with these activities. As a result, we cannot fully predict the impact that our commodity hedging activities and risk management decisions may have on our business and/or financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Economic downturns would likely have a material adverse effect on our businesses.

Our results of operations may be negatively affected by sustained downturns or sluggishness in the economy, including low levels in the market prices for power, generation capacity and natural gas, which can fluctuate substantially. Increased unemployment of residential customers and decreased demand for products and services by commercial and industrial customers resulting from an economic downturn could lead to declines in the demand for energy and an increase in the number of uncollectible customer balances, which would negatively impact our overall sales and cash flows. Additionally, prolonged economic downturns that negatively impact our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could result in future material impairment charges to write down the carrying value of certain assets to their respective fair values.

Our liquidity needs could be difficult to satisfy, particularly during times of uncertainty in the financial markets or during times of significant fluctuation in commodity prices, and we may be unable to access capital on favorable terms or at all in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on us. We currently maintain non-investment grade credit ratings that could negatively affect our ability to access capital on favorable terms or result in higher collateral requirements, particularly if our credit ratings were to be downgraded in the future.

Our businesses are capital intensive. In general, we rely on access to financial markets and credit facilities as a significant source of liquidity for our capital requirements and other obligations not satisfied by cash-on-hand or operating cash flows. The inability to raise capital or to access credit facilities, particularly on favorable terms, could adversely impact our liquidity and our ability to meet our obligations or sustain and grow our businesses and could increase capital costs and collateral requirements, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us.


Our access to capital and the cost and other terms of acquiring capital are dependent upon, and could be adversely impacted by, various factors, including:

general economic and capital markets conditions, including changes in financial markets that reduce available liquidity or the ability to obtain or renew credit facilities on favorable terms or at all;
conditions and economic weakness in the U.S. power markets;
regulatory developments;
changes in interest rates;
a deterioration, or perceived deterioration, of our creditworthiness, enterprise value or financial or operating results;
a reduction in Vistra Energy's or its applicable subsidiaries' credit ratings;
our level of indebtedness and compliance with covenants ininstruments governing our debt, agreements;
a deterioration of the creditworthiness or bankruptcy of one or more lenders or counterparties under our credit facilities that affects the ability of such lender(s) to make loans to us;
security or collateral requirements;
general credit availability from banks or other lenders for us and our industry peers;
investor confidence in the industry and in us and the wholesale electricity markets in which we operate;
volatility in commodity prices that increases credit requirements;
a material breakdown in our risk management procedures;
the occurrence of changes in our businesses;
disruptions, constraints, or inefficiencies in the continued reliable operation of our generation facilities, and
changes in or the operation of provisions of tax and regulatory laws.

In addition, we currently maintain non-investment grade credit ratings. As a result, we may not be able to access capital on terms (financial or otherwise) as favorable as companies that maintain investment-grade credit ratings or we may be unable to access capital at all at times when the credit markets tighten. In addition, our non-investment grade credit ratings may result in counterparties requesting collateral support (including cash or letters of credit) in order to enter into transactions with us.

A downgrade in long-term debt ratings generally causes borrowing costs to increase and the potential pool of investors to shrink and could trigger liquidity demands pursuant to contractual arrangements. Future transactions by Vistra Energy or any of its subsidiaries, including the issuance of additional debt, could result in a temporary or permanent downgrade in our credit ratings.

Our indebtedness could adversely affect our ability in the future to raise additional capital to fund our operations. It could also expose us to the risk of increased interest rates and limit our ability to react to changes in the economy, or our industry, as well as impact our cash available for distribution.

In connection with the Merger, we assumed all of Dynegy's outstanding indebtedness. As of December 31, 2018, we had approximately $11.1 billion of total indebtedness and approximately $10.4 billion of indebtedness net of cash. Our debt could have negative consequences for our financial condition including:

increasing our vulnerability to general economic and industry conditions;
requiring a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness, therefore reducing our ability to pay dividends to holders of our common stock or to fund our operations, capital expenditures and future business opportunities;
limiting our ability to enter into long-term power sales or fuel purchases which require credit support;
limiting our ability to fund operations or future acquisitions;
restricting our ability to make distributions or pay dividends with respect to our capital stock and the ability of our subsidiaries to make distributions to us, in light of restricted payment and other financial covenants in our credit facilities and other financing agreements;
inhibiting the growth of our stock price;
exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates because certain of our borrowings, including borrowings under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities are at variable rates of interest;
limitingand indentures, contain restrictions and limitations that could affect our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital including collateral postings, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes, and
limiting our ability to adjust to changing market conditions and placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors who may have less debt.


We may not be successful in obtaining additional capital for these or other reasons. Furthermore, we may be unable to refinance or replace our existing indebtedness on favorable terms or at all upon the expiration or termination thereof. Our failure to obtain additional capital or enter into new or replacement financing arrangements when due may constitute a default under such existing indebtedness and may have a material adverse effect onoperate our business, financial condition,our liquidity, and our results of operations, and cash flows.

The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities impose restrictions on us and any failure to comply with these restrictions could have a material adverse effect on us.


The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities contain restrictions that could adversely affect us by limiting•We may not be able to complete future acquisitions on favorable terms or at all, successfully integrate future acquisitions into our ability to plan for,business, or react to, market conditionseffectively identify and invest in value-creating businesses, assets or to meet our capital needs andprojects, which could result in an eventunanticipated expenses and losses or otherwise hinder or delay our growth strategy.

•Our solar generation, energy storage system, and other renewables development projects are subject to substantial uncertainties.

•Tax legislation initiatives or challenges to our tax positions, or potential future legislation or the imposition of default under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities. The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities contain events of default customary for financings of this type. If we fail to comply with the covenants in the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and are unable to obtain a waivernew or amendment,increased taxes or a default exists and is continuing, the lenders under such agreements could give notice and declare outstanding borrowings thereunder immediately due and payable. Any such acceleration of outstanding borrowingsfees, could have a material adverse effect on us.

Certain of our obligations are required to be secured by letters of credit or cash, which increase our costs. If we are unable to provide such security, it may restrict our ability to conduct our business, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

We undertake certain hedging and commodity activities and enter into certain financing arrangements with various counterparties that require cash collateral or the posting of letters of credit which are at risk of being drawn down in the event we default on our obligations. We currently use margin deposits, prepayments and letters of credit as credit support for commodity procurement and risk management activities. Future cash collateral requirements may increase based on the extent of our involvement in standard contracts and movements in commodity prices, and also based on our credit ratings and the general perception of creditworthiness in the markets in which we operate. In the case of commodity arrangements, the amount of such credit support that must be provided typically is based on the difference between the price of the commodity in a given contract and the market price of the commodity. Significant movements in market prices can result in our being required to provide cash collateral and letters of credit in very large amounts. The effectiveness of our strategy may be dependent on the amount of collateral available to enter into or maintain these contracts, and liquidity requirements may be greater than we anticipate or will be able to meet. Without a sufficient amount of working capital to post as collateral, we may not be able to manage price volatility effectively or to implement our strategy. An increase in the amount of letters of credit or cash collateral required to be provided to our counterparties may have a material adverse effect on us.

We may be unable to successfully integrate the operations of the legacy Dynegy assets with our existing operations or to realize targeted cost savings, revenues and other anticipated benefits of the Merger.

The success of the Merger will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated benefits and synergies from integrating Dynegy's assets with our existing retail and generation business. To realize these anticipated benefits, the businesses must be successfully combined.

We may be required to make unanticipated capital expenditures or investments in order to maintain, integrate, improve or sustain the assets' operations, or take unexpected write-offs or impairment charges resulting from the Merger. Further, we may be subject to unanticipated or unknown liabilities relating to the legacy Dynegy assets and operations. If any of these factors occur or limit our ability to integrate the businesses successfully or on a timely basis, the expectations regarding our future financial condition and results of operations following the Merger might not be met.

In addition, we continue to evaluate our estimates of synergies to be realized from, and refine the fair value accounting allocations associated with, the Merger. Accordingly, actual cost-savings, the costs required to realize the cost-savings, and the source of the cost-savings could differ materially from our estimates, and we cannot ensure that we will achieve the full amount of cost-savings on the schedule anticipated or at all.

Finally, we may not be able to achieve the targeted operating or long-term strategic benefits of the Merger. If the combined businesses are not able to achieve our objectives, or are not able to achieve our objectives on a timely basis, the anticipated benefits of the Merger may not be realized fully or at all. An inability to realize the full extent of, or any of, the anticipated benefits of the Merger, as well as any delays encountered in the integration process, could have an adverse effectaffect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.



The allocation of the purchase price to the value amounts recognized for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed related to the Merger as of the Merger Date is preliminary in nature and could differ materially from our initial purchase price allocation.

Based on the opening price of our common stock on the Merger Date, the preliminary purchase price of Dynegy in the Merger was approximately $2.3 billion as of December 31, 2018. The purchase price allocation is substantially complete, but is dependent upon final valuation determinations, which may materially change from our current estimates. The preliminary purchase price allocation reflected in our consolidated financial statements represents our current best estimates for property plant and equipment, identifiable intangible assets and liabilities, goodwill, inventories, asset retirement obligations, contingent liabilities and deferred taxes. We currently expect the final purchase price allocation will be completed no later than the first quarter of 2019 and goodwill will be allocated to the related reporting units at that time.

The proposed acquisition of Crius may not be completed in a timely fashion or at all, and the failure to successfully integrate the Crius business and operations in the expected time frame may adversely affect our future results.

Completion of the Crius Acquisition is subject to satisfaction of a number of conditions, including the receipt of unitholder approval and certain regulatory approvals for which the timing cannot be predicted. The expiration or termination of the applicable waiting periods, and any extension of the waiting periods, under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and approval by the FERC regulations may take considerable time. If Vistra Energy is not able to successfully integrate Crius' business and operations, or if there are additional and unforeseen expenses or delays in combining the businesses, realizing any anticipated synergies, accelerating retail growth expansion or optimizing existing fleet and operational efficiencies, the anticipated benefits of the Crius Acquisition may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected.

We may not be able to complete future acquisitions or successfully integrate future acquisitions into our business, which could result in unanticipated expenses and losses.

As part of our growth strategy, including our desire to grow our retail platform, we may pursue acquisitions of assets or operating entities. Our ability to continue to implement this component of our growth strategy will be limited by our ability to identify appropriate acquisition or joint venture candidates and our financial resources, including available cash and access to capital. Any expense incurred in completing acquisitions or entering into joint ventures, the time it takes to integrate an acquisition or our failure to integrate acquired businesses successfully could result in unanticipated expenses and losses. Furthermore, we may not be able to fully realize the anticipated benefits from any future acquisitions or joint ventures we may pursue. In addition, the process of integrating acquired operations into our existing operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenses and may require significant financial resources that would otherwise be available for the execution of our business strategy.

Circumstances associated with potential divestitures could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

In evaluating our business and the strategic fit of our various assets, we may determine to sell one or more of such assets. Despite a decision to divest an asset, we may encounter difficulty in finding a buyer willing to purchase the asset at an acceptable price and on acceptable terms and in a timely manner. In addition, a prospective buyer may have difficulty obtaining financing. Divestitures could involve additional risks, including:

difficulties in the separation of operations and personnel;
the need to provide significant ongoing post-closing transition support to a buyer;
management's attention may be temporarily diverted;
the retention of certain current or future liabilities in order to induce a buyer to complete a divestiture;
the obligation to indemnify or reimburse a buyer for certain past liabilities of a divested asset;
the disruption of our business, and
potential loss of key employees.

We may not be successful in managing these or any other significant risks that we may encounter in divesting any asset, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.


If our goodwill, intangible assets, or long-lived assets become impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings.

We have significant goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived assets recorded on our balance sheet. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, goodwill and non-amortizing intangible assets are required to be tested for impairment at least annually. Additionally, we review goodwill, our intangible assets and long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. Factors that may be considered include a decline in future cash flows, slower growth rates in the energy industry, and a sustained decrease in the price of our common stock.

We performed our annual assessment of goodwill and non-amortizing intangibles and determined that no impairment was required. However, impairment assessments will be performed in future periods and may result in an impairment loss, which could be material.

Issuances or acquisitions of our common stock, or sales or dispositions of our common stock by stockholders, that result in an ownership change as defined in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §382 could further limit our ability to use our federal net operating losses or alternative minimum tax credits to offset our future taxable income.

If an "ownership change," as defined in Section 382 of the IRC (IRC §382) occurs, the amount of NOLs and AMT credits that could be used in any one year following such ownership change could be substantially limited. In general, an "ownership change" would occur when there is a greater than 50 percentage point increase in ownership of a company's stock by stockholders, each of which owns (or is deemed to own under IRC §382) 5 percent or more of such company's stock. Given IRC §382's broad definition, an ownership change could be the unintended consequence of otherwise normal market trading in our stock that is outside our control. Vistra Energy acquired NOLs and AMT credits from its merger with Dynegy, however,Vistra Energy's use of such attributes is limited under IRC §382 because the merger constituted an "ownership change" with respect to Dynegy. If there is an "ownership change" with respect to Vistra Energy (including by the normal trading activity of greater than 5% shareholders), the utilization of all NOLs and AMT credits existing at that time would be subject to additional annual limitations based upon a formula provided under IRC §382 that is based on the fair market value of the Company and prevailing interest rates at the time of the ownership change.

Recent U.S. tax legislation may materially adversely affect Vistra Energy's financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law a comprehensive tax reform bill (the TCJA), that significantly reforms the Internal Revenue Code. The TCJA, among other things, contains significant changes to corporate taxation, including a reduction of the corporate income tax rate, a partial limitation on the deductibility of business interest expense, limitation of the deduction for certain net operating losses to 80% of current year taxable income, an indefinite net operating loss carryforward, immediate deductions for certain new investments instead of deductions for depreciation expense over time and the modification or repeal of many business deductions and credits. While we expect a beneficial impact from the TCJA from the reduction in corporate tax rates and immediate deductions for certain new investments, we continue to examine the tax reform legislation, as its overall impact is uncertain, and note that certain provisions of the TCJA or its interaction with existing law could adversely affect the Company's business and financial condition. The impact of this tax reform legislation on our stockholders is also uncertain and could be adverse.

We may be responsible for U.S. federal and state income tax liabilities that relate to the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale and Spin-Off.

Pursuant to the Tax Matters Agreement, the parties thereto have agreed to take certain actions and refrain from taking certain actions in order to preserve the intended tax treatment of the Spin-Off and to indemnify the other parties to the extent a breach of such covenant results in additional taxes to the other parties. If we breach such a covenant (or, in certain circumstances, if our stockholders or creditors of our Predecessor take or took certain actions that result in the intended tax treatment of the Spin-Off not to be preserved), we may be required to make substantial indemnification payments to the other parties to the Tax Matters Agreement.

The Tax Matters Agreement also allocates the responsibility for taxes for periods prior to the Spin-Off between EFH Corp. and us. For periods prior to the Spin-Off, (i) Vistra Energy is generally required to reimburse EFH Corp. with respect to any taxes paid by EFH Corp. that are attributable to us and (ii) EFH Corp. is generally required to reimburse us with respect to any taxes paid by us that are attributable to EFH Corp.


We are also required to indemnify EFH Corp. against certain taxes in the event the IRS or another taxing authority successfully challenges the amount of gain relating to the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale or the amount or allowance of EFH Corp.'s net operating loss deductions.

Our indemnification obligations to EFH Corp. are not limited by any maximum amount. If we are required to indemnify EFH Corp. or such other persons under the circumstances set forth in the Tax Matters Agreement, we may be subject to substantial liabilities.

•We are required to pay the holders of TRA Rights for certain tax benefits, which amounts are expected to be substantial.


On the Effective Date, we entered into the TRA with American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as the transfer agent. Pursuant to the TRA, we issued beneficial interests in the rights to receive payments under the TRA (TRA Rights) to the first lien creditors of our Predecessor to be held in escrow for the benefit of the first lien creditors of our Predecessor entitled to receive such TRA Rights under the Plan of Reorganization. Our financial statements reflect a liability of $420 million as of December 31, 2018 related to these future payment obligations (see Note 10 to the Financial Statements). This amount is based on certain assumptions as described more fully in the notes to the financial statements and the actual payments made under the TRA could be materially different than this estimate.

The TRA provides for the payment by us to the holders of TRA Rights of 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that we and our subsidiaries actually realize as a result of our use of (a) the tax basis step up attributable to the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale, (b) the entire tax basis of the assets acquired as a result of the purchase and sale agreement, dated as of November 25, 2015 by and between La Frontera Ventures, LLC and Luminant, and (c) tax benefits related to imputed interest deemed to be paid by us as a result of payments under the TRA. The amount and timing of any payments under the TRA will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the amount and timing of the taxable income we generate in the future and the tax rate then applicable, our use of loss carryovers and the portion of our payments under the TRA constituting imputed interest.

Although we are not aware of any issue that would cause the IRS to challenge the tax benefits that are the subject of the TRA, recipients of the payments under the TRA will not be required to reimburse us for any payments previously made if such tax benefits are subsequently disallowed. As a result, in such circumstances, Vistra Energy could make payments under the TRA that are greater than its actual cash tax savings. Any amount of excess payment can be used to reduce future TRA payments, but cannot be immediately recouped, which could adversely affect our liquidity.

Because Vistra Energy is a holding company with no operations of its own, its ability to make payments under the TRA is dependent on the ability of its subsidiaries to make distributions to it. To the extent that Vistra Energy is unable to make payments under the TRA because of the inability of its subsidiaries to make distributions to us for any reason, such payments will be deferred and will accrue interest until paid, which could adversely affect our results of operations and could also affect our liquidity in periods in which such payments are made.

The payments we will be required to make under the TRA could be substantial.

We may be required to make an early termination payment to the holders of TRA Rights under the TRA.

The TRA provides that, in the event that Vistra Energy breaches any of its material obligations under the TRA, or upon certain mergers, asset sales, or other forms of business combination or certain other changes of control, the transfer agent under the TRA may treat such event as an early termination of the TRA, in which case Vistra Energy would be required to make an immediate payment to the holders of the TRA Rights equal to the present value (at a discount rate equal to LIBOR plus 100 basis points) of the anticipated future tax benefits based on certain valuation assumptions.

As a result, upon any such breach or change of control, we could be required to make a lump sum payment under the TRA before we realize any actual cash tax savings and such lump sum payment could be greater than our future actual cash tax savings.

The aggregate amount of these accelerated payments could be materially more than our estimated liability for payments made under the TRA set forth in our financial statements. Based on this estimation, our obligations under the TRA could have a substantial negative impact on our liquidity.


We are potentially liable for U.S. income taxes of the entire EFH Corp. consolidated group for all taxable years in which we were a member of such group.

Prior to the Spin-Off, EFH Corporate Services Company, EFH Properties Company and certain other subsidiary corporations were included in the consolidated U.S. federal income tax group of which EFH Corp. was the common parent (EFH Corp. Consolidated Group). In addition, pursuant to the private letter ruling from the IRS that we received in connection with the Spin-Off, Vistra Energy will be considered a member of the EFH Corp. Consolidated Group immediately prior to the Spin-Off. Under U.S. federal income tax laws, any corporation that is a member of a consolidated group at any time during a taxable year is severally liable for the group's entire federal income tax liability for the entire taxable year. In addition, entities that are disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes may be liable as successors under common law theories or under certain regulations to the extent corporations transferred assets to such entities or merged or otherwise consolidated into such entities, whether under state law or purely as a matter of federal income tax law. Thus, notwithstanding any contractual rights to be reimbursed or indemnified by EFH Corp. pursuant to the Tax Matters Agreement, to the extent EFH Corp. or other members of the EFH Corp. Consolidated Group fail to make any U.S. federal income tax payments required of them by law in respect of taxable years for which the Company or any subsidiary noted above was a member of the EFH Corp. Consolidated Group, the Company or such subsidiary may be liable for the shortfall. At such time, we may not have sufficient cash on hand to satisfy such payment obligation.

Our ability to claim a portion of depreciation deductions may be limited for a period of time.

Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, a corporation's ability to utilize certain tax attributes, including depreciation, may be limited following an ownership change if the corporation's overall asset tax basis exceeds the overall fair market value of its assets (after making certain adjustments). The Spin-Off resulted in an ownership change for the Company and it is expected that the overall tax basis of our assets may have exceeded the overall fair market value of our assets at such time. As a result, there may be a limitation on our ability to claim a portion of our depreciation deductions for a five-year period. This limitation could have a material impact on our tax liabilities and on our obligations under the TRA Rights. In addition, any future ownership change of Vistra Energy following Emergence could likewise result in additional limitations on our ability to use certain tax attributes existing at the time of any such ownership change and have an impact on our tax liabilities and on our obligations under the TRA.

Regulatory and Legislative Risks


•Our businesses are subject to ongoing complex governmental regulations and legislation that have adversely impacted, and may in the future adversely impact, our businesses, results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.


Our businesses operate in changing market environments influenced by various state and federal legislative and regulatory initiatives regarding the restructuring of the energy industry, including competition in power generation and sale of electricity. Although we attempt to comply with changing legislative and regulatory requirements, there is a risk that we will fail to adapt to any such changes successfully or on a timely basis.

Our businesses are subject to numerous state and federal laws (including PURA, the Federal Power Act, the Atomic Energy Act, the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act), changing governmental policy and regulatory actions (including those of the FERC, the NERC, the RCT, the MSHA, the EPA, the NRC, CFTC, state public utility commissions and state environmental regulatory agencies), and the rules, guidelines and protocols of ERCOT, CAISO, ISO-NE, MISO, NYISO and PJM with respect to various matters, including, but not limited to, market structure and design, operation of nuclear generation facilities, construction and operation of other generation facilities, development, operation and reclamation of lignite mines, recovery of costs and investments, decommissioning costs, market behavior rules, present or prospective wholesale and retail competition and environmental matters. We, along with other market participants, are subject to electricity pricing constraints and market behavior and other competition-related rules and regulations under PURA. Changes in, revisions to, or reinterpretations of, existing laws and regulations may have a material adverse effect on us.

Dynegy's legacy business operates in a number of states and markets outside of our historical operations. As a result of the Merger, we became subject to the regulatory requirements of such markets, including CAISO, ISO-NE, MISO, NYISO and PJM. Because we have historically not been subject to the regulations of such markets, we may incur additional expenses, which may be material, to learn such regulations and ensure that we are operating in compliance with such regulations.


We are required to obtain, and to comply with, government permits and approvals.

We are required to obtain, and to comply with, numerous permits and licenses from federal, state and local governmental agencies. The process of obtaining and renewing necessary permits and licenses can be lengthy and complex and can sometimes result in the establishment of conditions that make the project or activity for which the permit or license was sought unprofitable or otherwise unattractive. In addition, such permits or licenses may be subject to denial, revocation or modification under various circumstances. Failure to obtain or comply with the conditions of permits or licenses, or failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, may result in the delay or temporary suspension of our operations and electricity sales or the curtailment of our delivery of electricity to our customers and may subject us to penalties and other sanctions. Although various regulators routinely renew existing permits and licenses, renewal of our existing permits or licenses could be denied or jeopardized by various factors, including (a) failure to provide adequate financial assurance for closure, (b) failure to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations or permit conditions, (c) local community, political or other opposition and (d) executive, legislative or regulatory action.

Our inability to procure and comply with the permits and licenses required for our operations, or the cost to us of such procurement or compliance, could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, new environmental legislation or regulations, if enacted, or changed interpretations of existing laws, may cause routine maintenance activities at our facilities to need to be changed to avoid violating applicable laws and regulations or elicit claims that historical routine maintenance activities at our facilities violated applicable laws and regulations. In addition to the possible imposition of fines in the case of any such violations, we may be required to undertake significant capital investments in emissions control technology and obtain additional operating permits or licenses, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

•Our cost of compliance with existing and new environmental laws could have a material adverse effect on us.


We are subject to extensive environmental regulation by governmental authorities,
20
Table of Contents
•Pending or proposed laws or regulations, including those proposed or implemented under the EPA and state environmental agencies and/or attorneys general. We may incur significant additional costs beyond those currently contemplated to comply with these regulatory requirements. If we fail to comply with these regulatory requirements, we could be subject to administrative, civil or criminal liabilities and fines. Existing environmental regulations could be revised or reinterpreted, new laws and regulations could be adopted or become applicable to us or our facilities, and future changes in environmental laws and regulations could occur, including potential regulatory and enforcement developments related to air emissions, all of which could result in significant additional costs beyond those currently contemplated to comply with existing requirements. Any of the foregoingBiden administration, could have a material adverse effect on us.our businesses, results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.


The EPA has recently finalized•Changes to laws, rules or proposed several regulatory actions establishing new requirements for control of certain emissions from sources, including electricity generation facilities. Inregulations related to market structures in the future, the EPAmarkets in which we participate may also propose and finalize additional regulatory actions that may adversely affect our existing generation facilities or our ability to cost-effectively develop new generation facilities. There is no assurance that the currently installed emissions control equipment at our lignite, coal and/or natural gas-fueled generation facilities will satisfy the requirements under any future EPA or state environmental regulations. Some of the recent regulatory actions and proposed actions, such as the EPA's Regional Haze Federal Implementation Plans (FIP) for reasonable progress and best available retrofit technology (BART), could require us to install significant additional control equipment, resulting in potentially material costs of compliance for our generation units, including capital expenditures, higher operating and fuel costs and potential production curtailments if the rules take effect as proposed or finalized. These costs could have a material adverse effect on us.our businesses, results of operation, liquidity and financial condition.


We may not be able to obtain or maintain all required environmental regulatory approvals. If there is a delay in obtaining any required environmental regulatory approvals, if we fail to obtain, maintain or comply with any such approval or if an approval is retroactively disallowed or adversely modified, the operation of our generation facilities could be stopped, disrupted, curtailed or modified or become subject to additional costs. Any such stoppage, disruption, curtailment, modification or additional costs could have a material adverse effect on us.

In addition, we may be responsible for any on-site liabilities associated with the environmental condition of facilities that we have acquired, leased or developed, regardless of when the liabilities arose and whether they are now known or unknown. In connection with certain acquisitions and sales of assets, we may obtain, or be required to provide, indemnification against certain environmental liabilities. Another party could, depending on the circumstances, assert an environmental claim against us or fail to meet its indemnification obligations to us.


•We could be materially and adversely affected if current regulations are implemented or if new federal or state legislation or regulations are adopted to address global climate change, or if we are subject to lawsuits for alleged damage to persons or property resulting from greenhouse gas emissions.


There is a concern nationally and internationally about global climate change and how GHG emissions, such as CO2, contribute to global climate change. Over the last several years, the U.S. Congress has considered and debated, and President Obama's administration previously discussed, several proposals intended to address climate change using different approaches, including a cap on carbon emissions with emitters allowed to trade unused emission allowances (cap-and-trade), a tax on carbon or GHG emissions, incentives for the development of low-carbon technology and federal renewable portfolio standards. In October 2015, the EPA finalized regulations under the CAA to limit CO2 emissions from existing generating units, referred to as the Clean Power Plan. If implemented as finalized, the Clean Power Plan would require the closure of a significant number of coal-fueled electricity generation units nationwide and in Texas. The Clean Power Plan is currently stayed pending the conclusion of legal challenges on the rule. In October 2017, the EPA proposed the repeal of the Clean Power Plan. In addition, a number of federal court cases have been filed in recent years asserting damage claims related to GHG emissions, and the results in those proceedings could establish adverse precedent that might apply to companies (including us) that produce GHG emissions. We could be materially and adversely affected if new federal and/or state legislation or regulations are adopted to address global climate change, if the Clean Power Plan is implemented as finalized or if we are subject to lawsuits for alleged damage to persons or property resulting from GHG emissions.

The integration of the Capacity Performance product into the PJM market and the Pay-for-Performance mechanism in ISO-NE could lead to substantial changes in capacity income and non-performance penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Both ISO-NE and PJM operate a pay-for-performance model where capacity payments are modified based on real-time generator performance. Capacity market prices are sensitive to design parameters, as well as additions of new capacity. We may experience substantial changes in capacity income and non-performance penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

The availability and cost of emission allowances could adversely impact our costs of operations.

We are required to maintain, through either allocations or purchases, sufficient emission allowances for SO2, CO2 and NOX to support our operations in the ordinary course of operating our power generation facilities. These allowances are used to meet the obligations imposed on us by various applicable environmental laws. If our operational needs require more than our allocated allowances, we may be forced to purchase such allowances on the open market, which could be costly. If we are unable to maintain sufficient emission allowances to match our operational needs, we may have to curtail our operations so as not to exceed our available emission allowances or install costly new emission controls. As we use the emission allowances that we have purchased on the open market, costs associated with such purchases will be recognized as operating expense. If such allowances are available for purchase, but only at significantly higher prices, the purchase of such allowances could materially increase our costs of operations in the affected markets.

Luminant's mining operations are subject to RCT oversight.

We currently own and operate, or are in the process of reclamation, 12 surface lignite coal mines in Texas to provide fuel for our electricity generation facilities. We also own or lease, and are in the process of reclaiming, two waste-to-energy surface facilities in Pennsylvania. The RCT, which exercises broad authority to regulate reclamation activity, reviews on an ongoing basis whether Luminant is compliant with RCT rules and regulations and whether it has met all the requirements of its mining permits. Any new rules and regulations adopted by the RCT or the Department of Interior Office of Surface Mining, which also regulates mining activity nationwide, or any changes in the interpretation of existing rules and regulations, could result in higher compliance costs or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition or cause a revocation of a mining permit. Any revocation of a mining permit would mean that Luminant would no longer be allowed to mine lignite at the applicable mine to serve its generation facilities. In addition, Luminant's mining reclamation obligations are secured by a first lien on its assets which is pari passu with the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, but which would be paid first, up to $975 million, upon any liquidation of Vistra Operations' assets. The RCT could, at any time, require that Luminant's mining reclamation obligations be secured by cash or letters of credit in lieu of such first lien. Any failure to provide any such cash or letter of credit collateral could result in Luminant no longer being able to mine lignite. Any such event could have a material adverse effect on us.


Luminant's lignite mining reclamation activity will require significant resources as existing and retired mining operations are reclaimed over the next several years.

In conjunction with Luminant's announcements in the third and fourth quarters of 2017 to retire several power generation assets and related mining operations, along with the continuous reclamation activity at its continuing mining operations for its mines related to the Oak Grove and Martin Lake generation assets, Luminant is expected to spend a significant amount of money, internal resources and time to complete the required reclamation activities. For the next five years, Vistra Energy is projected to spend approximately $340 million (on a nominal basis) to achieve its reclamation objectives.

•Litigation, legal proceedings, regulatory investigations or other administrative proceedings could expose us to significant liabilities and reputationreputational damage that could have a material adverse effect on us.


We are involved in the ordinary course of business in a number of lawsuits involving, among other matters, employment, commercial, and environmental issues, and other claims for injuries and damages. We evaluate litigation claims and legal proceedings to assess the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes and to estimate, if possible, the amount of potential losses. Based on these evaluations and estimates, when required by applicable accounting rules, we establish reserves and disclose the relevant litigation claims or legal proceedings, as appropriate. These evaluations and estimates are based on the information available to management at the time and involve a significant amount of judgment. Actual outcomes or losses may differ materially from current evaluations and estimates. The settlement or resolution of such claims or proceedings may have a material adverse effect on us. We use appropriate means to contest litigation threatened or filed against us, but the litigation environment poses a significant business risk.

We are also involved in the ordinary course of business in regulatory investigations and other administrative proceedings, and we are exposed to the risk that we may become the subject of additional regulatory investigations or administrative proceedings. While we cannot predict the outcome of any regulatory investigation or administrative proceeding, any such regulatory investigation or administrative proceeding could result in us incurring material penalties and/or other costs and have a materially adverse effect on us.

Our retail businesses, which each have REP certifications that are subject to review of the public utility commissions in the states in which we operate, are subject to changing state rules and regulations that could have a material impact on the profitability of our business.

The competitiveness of our retail businesses partially depends on state regulatory policies that establish the structure, rules, terms and conditions on which services are offered to retail customers. Specifically, the public utility commissions and/or the attorney generals of the various jurisdictions in which the Retail segment operates may at any time initiate an investigation into whether our retail operations comply with certain commission rules or state laws and whether we have met the requirements for REP certification, including financial requirements. These state policies and investigations, which can include controls on the retail rates our retail businesses can charge, the imposition of additional costs on sales, restrictions on our ability to obtain new customers through various marketing channels and disclosure requirements, investigations into whether our retail operations comply with certain commission rules or state laws and whether we have met the requirements for REP certification, including financial requirements, can affect the competitiveness of our retail businesses. Any removal or revocation of a REP certification would mean that we would no longer be allowed to provide electricity service to retail customers in the applicable jurisdiction, and such decertification could have a material adverse effect on us. Additionally, state or federal imposition of net metering or renewable portfolio standard programs can make it more or less expensive for retail customers to supplement or replace their reliance on grid power. Our retail businesses have limited ability to influence development of these state rules, regulations and policies, and our business model may be more or less effective, depending on changes to the regulatory environment.


Operational Risks


•Volatile power supply costs and demand for power have and could in the future adversely affect the financial performance of our retail businesses.

•Our retail operations are subject to significant competition from other REPs, which could result in a loss of existing customers and the inability to attract new customers.

•The operation of our businesses is subject to cyber-based security and integrity risk. Attacks on our infrastructure that breach cyber/data security measures could expose us to significant liabilities, reputational damage, regulatory action, and disrupt business operations, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

•We may suffer material losses, costs and liabilities due to operational risks, regulatory risks, and the risk of nuclear accidents arising from the ownership and operation of the Comanche Peak nuclear generation facility.

•The operation and maintenance of power generation facilities and related mining operations are capital intensive and involve significant risks that could adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

•We may be materially and adversely affected by obligations to comply with federal and state regulations, laws, and other legal requirements that govern the operations, assessments, storage, closure, corrective action, disposal and monitoring relating to CCR.

•We are subject to, and may be materially and adversely affected by, the effects of extreme weather conditions and seasonality.

•The outbreak of COVID-19, or the future outbreak of any other highly infectious or contagious diseases, could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

•Changes in technology, increased electricity conservation efforts, or energy sustainability efforts may reduce the value of our generation facilities and may otherwise have a material adverse effect on us.

Risks Related to Our Structure and Ownership of our Common Stock

•Investor focus on environmental, social, and governance issues, including climate change and sustainability matters, could adversely affect our stock price.

21
Table of Contents
Please carefully consider the following discussion of significant factors, events, and uncertainties that make an investment in our securities risky. These factors, in addition to others specifically addressed in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A), provide important information for the understanding of our forward-looking statements in this annual report on Form 10-K. If one or more of the factors, events and uncertainties discussed below or in the MD&A were to materialize, our business, results of operations, liquidity, financial condition, cash flows, reputation or prospects could be materially adversely affected. In addition, if one or more of such factors, events and uncertainties were to materialize, it could cause results or outcomes to differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statement in this annual report on Form 10-K. There may be further risks and uncertainties that are not currently known or that are not currently believed to be material that may adversely affect our business, results of operations, liquidity, financial condition and prospects and the market price of our common stock in the future. The realization of any of these factors could cause investors in our securities (including our common stock) to lose all or a substantial portion of their investment.

Market, Financial and Economic Risks

Our revenues, results of operations and operating cash flows generally are affected by price fluctuations in the wholesale power market and other market factors beyond our control.

We are not guaranteed any rate of return on capital investments in our businesses. We conduct integrated power generation and retail electricity activities, focusing on power generation, wholesale electricity sales and purchases, retail sales of electricity and natural gas to end users and commodity risk management. Our wholesale and retail businesses are to some extent countercyclical in nature, particularly for the wholesale power and ancillary services supplied to the retail business. However, we do have a wholesale power position that is subject to wholesale power price moves, which may be significant. As a result, our revenues, results of operations and operating cash flows depend in large part upon wholesale market prices for electricity, natural gas, uranium, lignite, coal, fuel, and transportation in our regional markets and other competitive markets in which we operate and upon prevailing retail electricity rates, which may be impacted by, among other things, actions of regulatory authorities.

Market prices for power, capacity, ancillary services, natural gas, coal and fuel oil are unpredictable and may fluctuate substantially over relatively short periods of time. Unlike most other commodities, electric power can only be stored on a very limited basis and generally must be produced concurrently with its use. As a result, power prices are subject to significant volatility due to supply and demand imbalances, especially in the day-ahead and spot markets. Demand for electricity can fluctuate dramatically, creating periods of substantial under- or over-supply. Over-supply can occur as a result of the construction of new power generation sources, as we have observed in recent years. During periods of over-supply, electricity prices might be depressed. For example, the cost of electricity from renewable resources, such as solar, wind and battery storage systems, has dropped substantially in recent years. In many instances, energy from these sources are bid into the relevant spot market at a price of zero or close to zero during certain times of the day, lowering the clearing price for all power wholesalers in such market. Also, at times there is political pressure, or pressure from regulatory authorities with jurisdiction over wholesale and retail energy commodity and transportation rates, to impose price limitations, bidding rules and other mechanisms to address volatility and other issues in these markets.

Extreme weather events can also materially impact power prices or otherwise exacerbate conditions or circumstances that result in volatility of power prices. For example, in February 2021, the U.S. experienced winter storm Uri and extreme cold temperatures in the central U.S., including Texas. This severe weather event substantially increased the demand for natural gas used in our electric power generation business, and the cold further limited the availability of renewable generation across the region contributing to extremely high market prices for natural gas and electricity, which resulted in substantial increases in the costs to procure sufficient fuel supply and increased collateral posting requirements. See "We may be materially and adversely affected by the effects of extreme weather conditions and seasonality" and Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional discussion about the expected impacts of extreme weather, including the winter storm.

22
Table of Contents
The majority of our facilities operate as "merchant" facilities without long-term power sales agreements. As a result, we largely sell electric energy, capacity and ancillary services into the wholesale energy spot market or into other wholesale and retail power markets on a short-term basis and are not guaranteed any rate of return on our capital investments. Consequently, there can be no assurance that we will be able to sell any or all of the electric energy, capacity or ancillary services from those facilities at commercially attractive rates or that our facilities will be able to operate profitably. We depend, in large part, upon prevailing market prices for power, capacity and fuel. Given the volatility of commodity power prices, to the extent we are unable to hedge or otherwise secure long-term power sales agreements for the output of our power generation facilities, our revenues and profitability will be subject to volatility, and our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

We purchase natural gas, coal, fuel oil, and nuclear fuel for our generation facilities, and higher than expected fuel costs, volatility, or disruption in these fuel markets may have an adverse impact on our costs, revenues, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

We rely on natural gas, coal, fuel oil, and nuclear fuel for the majority of our power generation facilities. Delivery of these fuels to the facilities is dependent upon the continuing financial viability of contractual counterparties as well as upon the infrastructure (including mines, rail lines, rail cars, barge facilities, roadways, riverways and natural gas pipelines) available and functioning to serve each generation facility. As a result, we are subject to the risks of disruptions or curtailments in the production of power at our generation facilities if no fuel is available at any price, if a counterparty fails to perform or if there is a disruption in the fuel delivery infrastructure.

We have sold forward a substantial portion of our expected power sales in the next one to two years in order to lock in long-term prices. In order to hedge our obligations under these forward power sales contracts, we have entered into long-term and short-term contracts for the purchase and delivery of fuel. Many of the forward power sales contracts do not allow us to pass through changes in fuel costs or discharge the power sale obligations in the case of a disruption in fuel supply due to force majeure events or the default of a fuel supplier or transporter. Fuel costs (including diesel, natural gas, lignite, coal and nuclear fuel) are volatile, and the wholesale price for electricity does not always change at the same rate as changes in fuel costs, and disruptions in our fuel supplies may therefore require us to find alternative fuel sources at costs which may be higher than planned, to find other sources of power to deliver to counterparties at a higher cost, or to pay damages to counterparties for failure to deliver power as contracted. Long-term and short-term contracts are subject to risk of non-delivery or claims of force majeure, which may impact our ability to economically recover the value of the contract. In addition, we purchase and sell natural gas and other energy related commodities, and volatility in these markets may affect costs incurred in meeting our obligations. Further, any changes in the costs of natural gas, coal, fuel oil, nuclear fuel or transportation rates and changes in the relationship between such costs and the market prices of power will affect our financial results. If we are unable to procure fuel for physical delivery at prices we consider favorable, or if we are unable to procure these fuels at all, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

We also buy significant quantities of fuel on a short-term or spot market basis. Prices for all of our fuels fluctuate, sometimes rising or falling significantly over a relatively short period of time. The price we can obtain for the sale of energy may not rise at the same rate, or may not rise at all, to match a rise in fuel or delivery costs. This may have a material adverse effect on our financial and operating performance. Volatility in market prices for fuel and electricity results from, among other factors:

•demand for energy commodities and general economic conditions;
•volatility in commodity prices and the supply of commodities, including but not limited to natural gas, coal and fuel oil;
•volatility in market heat rates;
•volatility in coal and rail transportation prices;
•volatility in nuclear fuel and related enrichment and conversion services;
•disruption or other constraints or inefficiencies of electricity, natural gas or coal transmission or transportation;
•severe, sustained or unexpected weather conditions, including extreme cold, drought and limitations on access to water;
•seasonality;
•changes in electricity and fuel usage resulting from conservation efforts, changes in technology or other factors;
•illiquidity in the wholesale electricity or other commodity markets;
•transmission or transportation disruptions, constraints, inoperability or inefficiencies, or other changes in power transmission infrastructure;
•development and availability of new fuels, new technologies and new forms of competition for the production and storage of power, including competitively priced alternative energy sources or storage;
23
Table of Contents
•changes in market structure and liquidity;
•changes in the way we operate our facilities, including curtailed operation due to market pricing, environmental regulations and legislation, safety or other factors;
•changes in generation capacity or efficiency;
•outages or otherwise reduced output from our generation facilities or those of our competitors;
•changes in electric capacity, including the addition of new supplies of power as a result of the development of new plants, expansion of existing plants, the continued operation of uneconomic power plants due to federal, state or local subsidies, or additional transmission capacity;
•our creditworthiness and liquidity and the willingness of fuel suppliers and transporters to do business with us;
•changes in the credit risk, payment practices, or financial condition of market participants;
•changes in production and storage levels of natural gas, lignite, coal, uranium, diesel and other refined products;
•natural disasters, wars, sabotage, terrorist acts, embargoes and other catastrophic events; and
•changes in law, including judicial decisions, federal, state and local energy, environmental and other regulation and legislation.

See Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional discussion about the expected impacts of winter storm Uri.

We have retired, announced planned retirements, and may be forced to retire or idle additional underperforming generation units which could result in significant costs and have an adverse effect on our operating results.

A sustained decrease in the financial results from, or the value of, our generation units has resulted in the retirement or planned retirement of, and ultimately could result in additional retirements or idling of, generation units. In recent years, we have generally operated certain of our lignite- and coal-fueled generation assets only during parts of the year that have higher electricity demand and, therefore, higher related wholesale electricity prices. In connection with the closure and remediation of retired generation units, we have spent, and may in the future spend, a significant amount of money, internal resources and time to complete the required closure and reclamation, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial and operating performance.

Our assets or positions cannot be fully hedged against changes in commodity prices and market heat rates, and hedging transactions may not work as planned or hedge counterparties may default on their obligations.

Our hedging activities do not fully protect us against the risks associated with changes in commodity prices, most notably electricity and natural gas prices, because of the expected useful life of our generation assets and the size of our position relative to the duration of available markets for various hedging activities. Generally, commodity markets that we participate in to hedge our exposure to electricity prices and heat rates have limited liquidity after two to three years. Further, our ability to hedge our revenues by utilizing cross-commodity hedging strategies with natural gas hedging instruments is generally limited to a duration of four to five years. To the extent we have unhedged positions, fluctuating commodity prices and/or market heat rates can materially impact our results of operations, cash flows, liquidity and financial condition, either favorably or unfavorably.

To manage our financial exposure related to commodity price fluctuations, we routinely enter into contracts to hedge portions of purchase and sale commitments, fuel requirements and inventories of natural gas, lignite, coal, diesel fuel, uranium and refined products, and other commodities, within established risk management guidelines. As part of this strategy, we routinely utilize fixed-price forward physical purchase and sale contracts, futures, financial swaps and option contracts traded in over-the-counter markets or on exchanges. Given our exposure to risks of commodity price movements, we devote a considerable amount of time and effort to the establishment of risk management policies and procedures, as well as the ongoing review of the implementation of these policies and procedures. Additionally, we have processes and controls in place that are designed to monitor and accurately report hedging activities and positions. The policies, procedures, processes and controls in place may not always function as planned and cannot eliminate all the risks associated with these activities, including unauthorized hedging activity, or improper reporting thereof, by our employees in violation of our existing risk management policies and procedures. For example, we hedge the expected needs of our wholesale and retail customers, but unexpected changes due to weather, natural disasters, consumer behavior, market constraints or other factors could cause us to purchase electricity to meet unexpected demand in periods of high wholesale market prices or resell excess electricity into the wholesale market in periods of low prices. As a result of these and other factors, the impacts of our commodity hedging activities and risk management decisions may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

24
Table of Contents
Based on economic and other considerations, we may not be able to, or we may decide not to, hedge the entire exposure of our operations to commodity price risk. To the extent we do not hedge against commodity price risk and applicable commodity prices change in ways adverse to us, we could be materially and adversely affected. To the extent we do hedge against commodity price risk, those hedges may ultimately prove to be ineffective. Additionally, there may be changes to existing laws or regulations that could significantly impact our ability to effectively hedge, which may have a material adverse effect on us.

With the continued tightening of credit markets that began in 2008 and expansion of regulatory oversight through various financial reforms, there has been a decline in the number of market participants in the wholesale energy commodities markets, resulting in less liquidity. Notably, participation by financial institutions and other intermediaries (including investment banks) in such markets has declined. Extended declines in market liquidity could adversely affect our ability to hedge our financial exposure to desired levels.

To the extent we engage in hedging and risk management activities, we are exposed to the credit risk that counterparties that owe us money, energy or other commodities as a result of these activities will not perform their obligations to us. Should the counterparties to these arrangements fail to perform, we could be forced to enter into alternative hedging arrangements or honor the underlying commitment at then-current market prices. Additionally, our counterparties may seek bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 or liquidation under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. Our credit risk may be exacerbated to the extent collateral held by us cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount due to us. There can be no assurance that any such losses or impairments to the carrying value of our financial assets would not materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In such event, we could incur losses or forgo expected gains in addition to amounts, if any, already paid to the counterparties. Market participants in the ISOs/RTOs in which we operate are also exposed to risks that another market participant may default on its obligations to pay such ISO/RTO for electricity or services taken, in which case such costs, to the extent not offset by posted security and other protections available to such ISO/RTO, may be allocated to various non-defaulting ISO/RTO market participants, including us.

We do not apply hedge accounting to our commodity derivative transactions, which may cause increased volatility in our quarterly and annual financial results.

We engage in economic hedging activities to manage our exposure related to commodity price fluctuations through the use of financial and physical derivative contracts for commodities. These derivatives are accounted for in accordance with GAAP, which requires that we record all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value with changes in fair value immediately recognized in earnings as unrealized gains or losses. GAAP permits an entity to designate qualifying derivative contracts as normal purchases and sales. If designated, those contracts are not recorded at fair value. GAAP also permits an entity to designate qualifying derivative contracts in a hedge accounting relationship. If a hedge accounting relationship is used, a significant portion of the changes in fair value is not immediately recognized in earnings. We have elected not to apply hedge accounting to our commodity contracts, and we have designated contracts as normal purchases and sales in only limited cases, such as our retail sales contracts. As a result, our quarterly and annual financial results in accordance with GAAP are subject to significant fluctuations caused by changes in forward commodity prices.

Competition, changes in market structure, and/or state or federal interference in the wholesale and retail power markets, together with subsidized generation, may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our generation and competitive retail businesses rely on a competitive wholesale marketplace. The competitive wholesale marketplace may be undermined by changes in market structure and out-of-market subsidies provided by federal or state entities, including bailouts of uneconomic plants, imports of power from Canada, renewable mandates or subsidies, as well as out-of-market payments to new generators.

Our power generation business competes with other non-utility generators, regulated utilities, unregulated subsidiaries of regulated utilities, other energy service companies and financial institutions in the sale of electric energy, capacity and ancillary services, as well as in the procurement of fuel, transmission and transportation services. Moreover, aggregate demand for power may be met by generation capacity based on several competing technologies, as well as power generating facilities fueled by alternative or renewable energy sources, including hydroelectric power, synthetic fuels, solar, wind, wood, geothermal, waste heat and solid waste sources. Regulatory initiatives designed to enhance and/or subsidize renewable generation increases competition from these types of facilities and out-of-market subsidies to existing or new generation can undermine the competitive wholesale marketplace, which can lead to premature retirement of existing facilities, including those owned by us.

25
Table of Contents
We also compete against other energy merchants on the basis of our relative operating skills, financial position and access to credit sources. Electric energy customers, wholesale energy suppliers and transporters often seek financial guarantees, credit support such as letters of credit and other assurances that their energy contracts will be satisfied. Companies with which we compete may have greater resources or experience in these areas. Over time, some of our plants may become unable to compete because of subsidized generation, including public utility commission supported power purchase agreements, and the construction of new plants. Such new plants could have a number of advantages including: more efficient equipment, newer technology that could result in fewer emissions or more advantageous locations on the electric transmission system. Additionally, these competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new laws and regulations because of the newer technology utilized in their facilities or the additional resources derived from owning more efficient facilities.

Other factors may contribute to increased competition in wholesale power markets. We expect that we will continue to face intense competition from numerous companies, including new entrants or consolidation of existing competitors, in the industry. Certain federal and state entities in jurisdictions in which we operate have either enacted or are considering regulations or legislation to subsidize otherwise uneconomic plants and attempt to incent, including through certain tax benefits, the construction and development of additional renewable resources as well as increases in energy efficiency investments. Subsidies (or increases thereto) to our competitors could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In addition, our retail marketing efforts compete for customers in a competitive environment, which impacts the margins that we can earn on the volumes we are able to serve. Further, with retail competition, it is easier for residential customers where we serve load to switch to and from competitive electricity generation suppliers for their energy needs. The volatility and uncertainty that results from such mobility may have material adverse effects on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. For example, if fewer customers switch to another supplier than anticipated, the load we must serve will be greater than anticipated and, if market prices of fuel have increased, our costs will increase more than expected due to the need to go to the market to cover the incremental supply obligation. If more customers switch to another supplier than anticipated, the load we must serve will be lower than anticipated and, if market prices of electricity have decreased, our operating results could suffer.

Our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected if energy market participants continue to construct new generation facilities or expand or enhance existing generation facilities despite relatively low power prices and such additional generation capacity results in a reduction in wholesale power prices.

Given the overall attractiveness of certain of the markets in which we operate and certain tax benefits associated with renewable energy, among other matters, energy market participants have continued to construct new generation facilities or invest in enhancements or expansions of existing generation facilities despite relatively low wholesale power prices. If this market dynamic continues, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected if such additional generation capacity results in an over-supply of electricity that causes a reduction in wholesale power prices.

Economic downturns would likely have a material adverse effect on our businesses.

Our results of operations may be negatively affected by sustained downturns or sluggishness in the economy, including lower prices for power, generation capacity and natural gas, which can fluctuate substantially. Increased unemployment of residential customers and decreased demand for products and services by commercial and industrial customers resulting from an economic downturn could lead to declines in the demand for energy and an increase in the number of uncollectible customer balances, which would negatively impact our overall sales and cash flows. Additionally, prolonged economic downturns that negatively impact our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could result in future material impairment charges to write down the carrying value of certain assets to their respective fair values.

26
Table of Contents
Our liquidity needs could be difficult to satisfy, particularly during times of uncertainty in the financial markets or during times of significant fluctuation in commodity prices, and we may be unable to access capital on favorable terms or at all in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on us. We currently maintain non-investment grade credit ratings that could negatively affect our ability to access capital on favorable terms or result in higher collateral requirements, particularly if our credit ratings were to be downgraded in the future.

Our businesses are capital intensive. In general, we rely on access to financial markets and credit facilities as a significant source of liquidity for our capital requirements and other obligations not satisfied by cash-on-hand or operating cash flows. The inability to raise capital or to access credit facilities, particularly on favorable terms, could adversely impact our liquidity and our ability to meet our obligations or sustain and grow our businesses and could increase capital costs and collateral requirements, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our access to capital and the cost and other terms of acquiring capital are dependent upon, and could be adversely impacted by, various factors, including:

•general economic and capital markets conditions, including changes in financial markets that reduce available liquidity or the ability to obtain or renew credit facilities on favorable terms or at all;
•conditions and economic weakness in the U.S. power markets;
•regulatory developments;
•changes in interest rates;
•a deterioration, or perceived deterioration, of our creditworthiness, enterprise value or financial or operating results;
•a downgrade of Vistra's or its applicable subsidiaries' credit ratings, or credit ratings of its issuances;
•our level of indebtedness and compliance with covenants in our debt agreements;
•a deterioration of the creditworthiness or bankruptcy of one or more lenders or counterparties under our credit facilities that affects the ability of such lender(s) to make loans to us;
•credit, security, or collateral requirements, including those relating to volatility in commodity prices;
•general credit availability from banks or other lenders for us and our industry peers;
•investor and lender confidence in and sentiment of the industry, our business, and the wholesale electricity markets in which we operate;
•a material breakdown in or oversight in effectuating our risk management procedures;
•the occurrence of changes in our businesses;
•disruptions, constraints, or inefficiencies in the continued reliable operation of our generation facilities and energy storage systems; and
•changes in or the operation of provisions of tax and regulatory laws.

There are also increasing financial risks for companies that own and operate fossil fuel generation as institutional lenders have become more attentive to sustainable lending practices and some of them may elect not to provide funding for companies who produce or utilize fossil fuel energy or that have higher levels of GHG emissions. Additionally, the lending practices of institutional lenders have been the subject of intensive lobbying efforts in recent years, oftentimes public in nature, by environmental activists and others concerned about climate change not to provide funding for companies in the broader energy sector. Limitation on our access to, or increases in our cost of, capital could have a material adverse effect on us.

In addition, we currently maintain non-investment grade credit ratings. As a result, we may not be able to access capital on terms (financial or otherwise) as favorable as companies that maintain investment-grade credit ratings or we may be unable to access capital at all at times when the credit markets tighten. In addition, due to our non-investment grade credit ratings, counterparties request collateral support (including cash or letters of credit) in order to enter into certain transactions with us.

A downgrade in long-term debt ratings generally causes borrowing costs to increase and the potential pool of investors to shrink and could trigger liquidity demands pursuant to contractual arrangements. Future transactions by Vistra or any of its subsidiaries, including the issuance of additional debt, could result in a temporary or permanent downgrade in our credit ratings.

27
Table of Contents
Our indebtedness and the proposed phaseout of LIBOR, or the replacement of LIBOR with a different reference rate, could adversely affect our ability in the future to raise additional capital to fund our operations. It could also expose us to the risk of increased interest rates and limit our ability to react to changes in the economy, or our industry, as well as impact our cash available for distribution.

As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately $9.6 billion of total indebtedness and approximately $9.2 billion of indebtedness net of cash. Our debt could have negative consequences for our financial condition including:

•increasing our vulnerability to general economic and industry conditions;
•requiring a significant portion of our cash flows from operations to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness, therefore reducing our ability to pay dividends to holders of our common stock or to fund our operations, capital expenditures and future business opportunities;
•limiting our ability to enter into long-term power sales or fuel purchases which require credit support;
•limiting our ability to fund operations or future acquisitions;
•restricting our ability to make distributions or pay dividends with respect to our capital stock and the ability of our subsidiaries to make distributions to us, in light of restricted payment and other financial covenants in our credit facilities and other financing agreements;
•inhibiting the growth of our stock price;
•exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates because certain of our borrowings, including borrowings under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, are at variable rates of interest;
•limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital including collateral postings, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes; and
•limiting our ability to adjust to changing market conditions and placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors who may have less debt.

We may not be successful in obtaining additional capital for these or other reasons. Furthermore, we may be unable to refinance or replace our existing indebtedness on favorable terms or at all upon the expiration or termination thereof. Our failure to obtain additional capital or enter into new or replacement financing arrangements when due may constitute a default under such existing indebtedness and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In July 2017, the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced that it intends to phase out LIBOR by the end of 2021. LIBOR is the interest rate benchmark used as a reference rate on a portion of our variable rate debt, including our revolving credit facility and interest rate swaps. It is unclear if LIBOR will cease to exist at that time or if new methods of calculating LIBOR will be established such that it continues to exist after 2021. In November 2020, ICE Benchmark Administration (IBA), the administrator of LIBOR, with the support of the U.S. Federal Reserve and the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority, announced plans to consult on ceasing publication of USD LIBOR on December 31, 2021 for only the one-week and two-month USD LIBOR tenors, and on June 30, 2023 for all other USD LIBOR tenors. While this announcement extends the transition period to June 2023, the U.S. Federal Reserve concurrently issued a statement advising banks to stop new USD LIBOR issuances by the end of 2021. In light of these recent announcements, the future of LIBOR at this time is uncertain and any changes in the methods by which LIBOR is determined or regulatory activity related to LIBOR's phaseout could cause LIBOR to perform differently than in the past or cease to exist. Although regulators and IBA have made clear that the recent announcements should not be read to say that LIBOR has ceased or will cease, in the event LIBOR does cease to exist, we may need to amend our credit agreements and other agreements with LIBOR as the referenced rate, which may result in interest rates and/or payments that do not correlate over time with the interest rates and/or payments that would have been made on our obligations if LIBOR was available in its current form. The Company will also need to consider new contracts and if they should reference an alternative benchmark rate or include suggested fallback language. Accordingly, we could be exposed to increased costs with respect to our variable rate debt, which could have an adverse impact on extensions of our credit and/or we might not be fully hedged on the variable rate exposure on our swapped indebtedness. Any such increased costs or exposure could increase our cost of capital and have a material adverse effect on us.

28
Table of Contents
The agreements and instruments governing our debt, including the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and indentures, contain restrictions and limitations that could affect our ability to operate our business, or liquidity, and results of operations, and any failure to comply with these restrictions could have a material adverse effect on us.

The agreements and instruments governing our debt, including the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and indentures, contain restrictions that could adversely affect us by limiting our ability to operate our businesses and plan for, or react to, market conditions or to meet our capital needs and could result in an event of default under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and/or indentures. The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and indentures contain events of default customary for financings of this type. If we fail to comply with the covenants in the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and/or indentures and are unable to obtain a waiver or amendment, or a default exists and is continuing, the lenders under such agreements or notes, as the case may be, could give notice and declare outstanding borrowings thereunder immediately due and payable. The breach of any covenants or obligations in certain agreements and instruments governing our debt, including the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and indentures, not otherwise waived or amended, could result in a default under the applicable debt obligations and could trigger acceleration of those obligations, which in turn could trigger cross defaults under other agreements governing our debt, and any such acceleration of outstanding borrowings could have a material adverse effect on us.

Certain of our obligations are required to be secured by letters of credit or cash, which increase our costs. If we are unable to provide such security, it may restrict our ability to conduct our business, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

We undertake certain hedging and commodity activities and enter into certain financing arrangements with various counterparties that require cash collateral or the posting of letters of credit which are at risk of being drawn down in the event we default on our obligations. We currently use margin deposits, prepayments and letters of credit as credit support for commodity procurement and risk management activities. Future cash collateral requirements may increase based on the extent of our involvement in standard contracts and movements in commodity prices, and also based on our credit ratings and the general perception of creditworthiness in the markets in which we operate. In the case of commodity arrangements, the amount of such credit support that must be provided typically is based on the difference between the price of the commodity in a given contract and the market price of the commodity. Significant movements in market prices can result in our being required to provide cash collateral and letters of credit in very large amounts. The effectiveness of our strategy may be dependent on the amount of collateral available to enter into or maintain these contracts, and liquidity requirements may be greater than we anticipate or will be able to meet. Without a sufficient amount of working capital to post as collateral, we may not be able to manage price volatility effectively or to implement our strategy. An increase in the amount of letters of credit or cash collateral required to be provided to our counterparties may have a material adverse effect on us.

We may not be able to complete future acquisitions on favorable terms or at all, successfully integrate future acquisitions into our business, or effectively identify and invest in value-creating businesses, assets or projects, which could result in unanticipated expenses and losses or otherwise hinder or delay our growth strategy.

As part of our growth strategy, including our desire to grow our retail platform, we may pursue acquisitions of assets or operating entities. This strategy depends on the Company's ability to successfully identify and evaluate acquisition opportunities and consummate acquisitions on favorable terms. Our ability to continue to implement this component of our growth strategy will be limited by our ability to identify appropriate acquisition or joint venture candidates and our financial resources, including available cash and access to capital. In addition, the Company will compete with other companies for these limited acquisition opportunities, which may increase the Company's cost of making acquisitions or limit the Company’s ability to make acquisitions at all. Any expense incurred in completing acquisitions or entering into joint ventures, the time it takes to integrate an acquisition or our failure to integrate acquired businesses successfully could result in unanticipated expenses and losses. Furthermore, we may not be able to fully realize the anticipated benefits from any future acquisitions or joint ventures we may pursue. In addition, the process of integrating acquired operations into our existing operations may involve unknown risks, result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenses, and may require significant financial resources that would otherwise be available for the execution of our business strategy. If the Company is unable to identify and consummate future acquisitions, it may impede the Company's ability to execute its growth strategy.

29
Table of Contents
We have a substantial capital allocation plan intended for investments in renewable assets, including solar development projects and energy storage systems. As part of our business strategy, we plan to continually assess potential strategic acquisitions or investments in renewable assets, emerging technologies and related projects. Notably, the Company's ability to successfully develop our current renewables projects, or in the future acquire additional renewable assets, may be impacted by the demand for and viability of renewable assets generally, which may vary depending on availability of projects and financing, as well as public policy, financial and tax mechanisms implemented at the state and federal levels to support the development of renewable assets. Furthermore, various factors could result in increased costs or result in delays or cancellation of these projects, or the loss of, or declines in the value of, our investments in renewable projects. Risks may include both federal and state regulatory approval processes, new legislation impacting the industry, changes to federal income tax laws, economic events or factors, environmental and community concerns, availability of or requirements for additional funding, and enhanced competition. Should any of these factors occur, our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows could be adversely affected, or our future growth opportunities may not be realized as anticipated.

Our solar generation, energy storage system, and other renewables development projects are subject to substantial uncertainties.

Certain of our subsidiaries are in various stages of developing and constructing solar generation facilities and energy storage systems. Certain of these projects have signed long-term contracts or made similar arrangements for the sale of electricity. Successful completion of the development of these projects depends upon overcoming substantial risks, including, but not limited to, risks relating to siting, financing, engineering and construction, permitting, governmental approvals, regulatory changes, commissioning delays, or the potential for termination of the power sales contract as a result of a failure to meet certain milestones. Additionally, the increased demand for construction of renewables projects, such as energy storage systems and solar projects, may result in limited availability of qualified specialists, contractors, and necessary services and materials, which could lead to delays in and higher costs for the development and construction of our current and future planned projects.

In certain cases, our subsidiaries may enter into obligations in the development process even though the subsidiaries have not yet secured power purchase arrangements or other important elements for a successful project. If the project does not proceed as planned, our subsidiaries may remain obligated for certain liabilities even though the project will not be completed. Development is inherently uncertain and we may forgo certain development opportunities and we may undertake significant development costs before determining that we will not proceed with a particular project. We believe that capitalized costs for projects under development are recoverable; however, there can be no assurance that any individual project will be completed and reach commercial operation. If these development efforts are not successful, we may abandon a project under development and write off the costs incurred in connection with such project and could incur additional losses associated with any related contingent liabilities.

Circumstances associated with potential divestitures could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

In evaluating our business and the strategic fit of our various assets, we may determine to sell one or more of such assets. Despite a decision to divest an asset, we may encounter difficulty in finding a buyer willing to purchase the asset at an acceptable price and on acceptable terms and in a timely manner. In addition, a prospective buyer may have difficulty obtaining financing. Divestitures could involve additional risks, including:

•difficulties in the separation of operations and personnel;
•the need to provide significant ongoing post-closing transition support to a buyer;
•management's attention may be temporarily diverted;
•the retention of certain current or future liabilities in order to induce a buyer to complete a divestiture;
•the obligation to indemnify or reimburse a buyer for certain past liabilities of a divested asset;
•the disruption of our business; and
•potential loss of key employees.

We may not be successful in managing these or any other significant risks that we may encounter in divesting any asset, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

30
Table of Contents
If our goodwill, intangible assets, or long-lived assets become impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings.

We have significant goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived assets recorded on our balance sheet. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, goodwill and non-amortizing intangible assets are required to be tested for impairment at least annually. Additionally, we review goodwill, our intangible assets and long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. Factors that may be considered include a decline in future cash flows, slower growth rates in the energy industry, and a sustained decrease in the price of our common stock.

We performed our annual assessment of goodwill and non-amortizing intangibles in the fourth quarter of 2020 and determined that no impairment was required. However, impairment assessments will be performed in future periods and may result in an impairment loss, which could be material.

Issuances or acquisitions of our common stock, or sales or dispositions of our common stock by stockholders, that result in an ownership change as defined in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §382 could further limit our ability to use our federal net operating losses to offset our future taxable income.

If an "ownership change," as defined in Section 382 of the IRC (IRC §382) occurs, the amount of NOLs that could be used in any one year following such ownership change could be substantially limited. In general, an "ownership change" would occur when there is a greater than 50 percentage point increase in ownership of a company's stock by stockholders, each of which owns (or is deemed to own under IRC §382) 5 percent or more of such company's stock. Given IRC §382's broad definition, an ownership change could be the unintended consequence of otherwise normal market trading in our stock that is outside our control. Vistra acquired NOLs from its merger with Dynegy; however,Vistra's use of such attributes is limited under IRC §382 because the merger constituted an "ownership change" with respect to Dynegy. If there is an "ownership change" with respect to Vistra (including by the normal trading activity of greater than 5% stockholders), the utilization of all NOLs existing at that time would be subject to additional annual limitations based upon a formula provided under IRC §382 that is based on the fair market value of the Company and prevailing interest rates at the time of the ownership change.

Tax legislation initiatives or challenges to our tax positions, or potential future legislation or the imposition of new or increased taxes or fees, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We are subject to the tax laws and regulations of the U.S. federal, state and local governments. From time to time, legislative measures may be enacted that could adversely affect our overall tax positions regarding income or other taxes. There can be no assurance that our effective tax rate or tax payments will not be adversely affected by these legislative measures. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA), enacted December 22, 2017, introduced significant changes to current U.S. federal tax law. These changes are complex and continue to be the subject of additional guidance issued by the U.S. Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, the reaction to the federal tax changes by the individual states continues to evolve. Our interpretations and assumptions around U.S. tax reform may evolve in future periods as further administrative guidance and regulations are issued, which may materially affect our effective tax rate or tax payments.

U.S. federal, state and local tax laws and regulations are extremely complex and subject to varying interpretations. There can be no assurance that our tax positions will be sustained if challenged by relevant tax authorities and if not sustained, there could be a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Additionally, U.S. federal income tax reform and changes in other tax laws could adversely affect us. For example, President Biden has set forth several tax proposals that would, if enacted into law, make significant changes to U.S. tax laws. Such proposals include, but are not limited to (i) an increase in the U.S. corporate income tax rate and (ii) implementation of a 15% minimum tax on a corporation’s worldwide book income. Congress could consider some or all of these proposals in connection with tax reform to be undertaken by the Biden administration. It is unclear whether these or similar changes will be enacted and, if enacted, how soon any such changes could take effect. Additionally, states in which we operate or own assets may impose new or increased taxes or fees on various aspects of our operations. The passage of any legislation as a result of these proposals and other similar changes in U.S. federal income tax laws or the imposition of new or increased taxes or fees could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

31
Table of Contents
We may be responsible for U.S. federal and state income tax liabilities that relate to the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale and Spin-Off.

Pursuant to the Tax Matters Agreement, the parties thereto have agreed to take certain actions and refrain from taking certain actions in order to preserve the intended tax treatment of the Spin-Off and to indemnify the other parties to the extent a breach of such covenant results in additional taxes to the other parties. If we breach such a covenant (or, in certain circumstances, if our stockholders or creditors of our Predecessor take or took certain actions that result in the intended tax treatment of the Spin-Off not to be preserved), we may be required to make substantial indemnification payments to the other parties to the Tax Matters Agreement.

The Tax Matters Agreement also allocates the responsibility for taxes for periods prior to the Spin-Off between EFH Corp. and us. For periods prior to the Spin-Off, (i) Vistra is generally required to reimburse EFH Corp. with respect to any taxes paid by EFH Corp. that are attributable to us and (ii) EFH Corp. is generally required to reimburse us with respect to any taxes paid by us that are attributable to EFH Corp.

We are also required to indemnify EFH Corp. against certain taxes in the event the IRS or another taxing authority successfully challenges the amount of gain relating to the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale or the amount or allowance of EFH Corp.'s net operating loss deductions.

Our indemnification obligations to EFH Corp. are not limited by any maximum amount. If we are required to indemnify EFH Corp. or such other persons under the circumstances set forth in the Tax Matters Agreement, we may be subject to substantial liabilities.

We are required to pay the holders of TRA Rights for certain tax benefits, which amounts could be substantial.

On the Effective Date, we entered into the TRA with American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as the transfer agent. Pursuant to the TRA, we issued beneficial interests in the rights to receive payments under the TRA (TRA Rights) to the first lien creditors of our Predecessor to be held in escrow for the benefit of the first lien creditors of our Predecessor entitled to receive such TRA Rights under the Plan of Reorganization. Our financial statements reflect a liability of $450 million as of December 31, 2020 related to these future payment obligations (see Note 8 to the Financial Statements). This amount is based on certain assumptions as described more fully in the notes to the financial statements and the actual payments made under the TRA could be materially different than this estimate.

The TRA generally provides for the payment by us to the holders of TRA Rights of 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that we and our subsidiaries actually realize as a result of our use of (a) the tax basis step up attributable to the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale, (b) the entire tax basis of the assets acquired as a result of the purchase and sale agreement, dated as of November 25, 2015 by and between La Frontera Ventures, LLC and Luminant, and (c) tax benefits related to imputed interest deemed to be paid by us as a result of payments under the TRA, plus interest accruing from the due date of the applicable tax return. The amount and timing of any payments under the TRA will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the amount and timing of the taxable income we generate in the future and the tax rate then applicable, our use of loss carryovers and the portion of our payments under the TRA constituting imputed interest.

Although we are not aware of any issue that would cause the IRS to challenge the tax benefits that are the subject of the TRA, recipients of the payments under the TRA will not be required to reimburse us for any payments previously made if such tax benefits are subsequently disallowed. As a result, in such circumstances, Vistra could make payments under the TRA that are greater than its actual cash tax savings. Any amount of excess payment can be used to reduce future TRA payments, but cannot be immediately recouped, which could adversely affect our liquidity.

Because Vistra is a holding company with no operations of its own, its ability to make payments under the TRA is dependent on the ability of its subsidiaries to make distributions to it. To the extent that Vistra is unable to make payments under the TRA because of the inability of its subsidiaries to make distributions to us for any reason, such payments will be deferred and will accrue interest until paid, which could adversely affect our results of operations and could also affect our liquidity in periods in which such payments are made.

The payments we will be required to make under the TRA could be substantial.

32
Table of Contents
We may be required to make an early termination payment to the holders of TRA Rights under the TRA.

The TRA provides that, in the event that Vistra breaches any of its material obligations under the TRA, or upon certain mergers, asset sales, or other forms of business combination or certain other changes of control, the transfer agent under the TRA may treat such event as an early termination of the TRA, in which case Vistra would be required to make an immediate payment to the holders of the TRA Rights equal to the present value (at a discount rate equal to LIBOR plus 100 basis points) of the anticipated future tax benefits based on certain valuation assumptions.

As a result, upon any such breach or change of control, we could be required to make a lump sum payment under the TRA before we realize any actual cash tax savings and such lump sum payment could be greater than our future actual cash tax savings.

The aggregate amount of these accelerated payments could be materially more than our estimated liability for payments made under the TRA set forth in our financial statements, which could have a substantial negative impact on our liquidity.

We are potentially liable for U.S. income taxes of the entire EFH Corp. consolidated group for all taxable years in which we were a member of such group.

Prior to the Spin-Off, EFH Corporate Services Company, EFH Properties Company and certain other subsidiary corporations were included in the consolidated U.S. federal income tax group of which EFH Corp. was the common parent (EFH Corp. Consolidated Group). In addition, pursuant to the private letter ruling from the IRS that we received in connection with the Spin-Off, Vistra will be considered a member of the EFH Corp. Consolidated Group immediately prior to the Spin-Off. Under U.S. federal income tax laws, any corporation that is a member of a consolidated group at any time during a taxable year is severally liable for the group's entire federal income tax liability for the entire taxable year. In addition, entities that are disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes may be liable as successors under common law theories or under certain regulations to the extent corporations transferred assets to such entities or merged or otherwise consolidated into such entities, whether under state law or purely as a matter of federal income tax law. Thus, notwithstanding any contractual rights to be reimbursed or indemnified by EFH Corp. pursuant to the Tax Matters Agreement, to the extent EFH Corp. or other members of the EFH Corp. Consolidated Group fail to make any U.S. federal income tax payments required of them by law in respect of taxable years for which the Company or any subsidiary noted above was a member of the EFH Corp. Consolidated Group, the Company or such subsidiary may be liable for the shortfall. At such time, we may not have sufficient cash on hand to satisfy such payment obligation.

Our ability to claim a portion of depreciation deductions may be limited for a period of time.

Under the IRC, as amended, a corporation's ability to utilize certain tax attributes, including depreciation, may be limited following an ownership change if the corporation's overall asset tax basis exceeds the overall fair market value of its assets (after making certain adjustments). The Spin-Off resulted in an ownership change for the Company and it is expected that the overall tax basis of our assets may have exceeded the overall fair market value of our assets at such time. As a result, there may be a limitation on our ability to claim a portion of our depreciation deductions for a five-year period. This limitation could have a material impact on our tax liabilities and on our obligations under the TRA Rights. In addition, any future ownership change of Vistra following Emergence could likewise result in additional limitations on our ability to use certain tax attributes existing at the time of any such ownership change and have an impact on our tax liabilities and on our obligations under the TRA.

Regulatory and Legislative Risks

Our businesses are subject to ongoing complex governmental regulations and legislation that have adversely impacted, and may in the future adversely impact, our businesses, results of operations, liquidity, financial condition and cash flows.

Our businesses operate in changing market environments influenced by various state and federal legislative and regulatory initiatives regarding the restructuring of the energy industry, including competition in power generation and sale of electricity and natural gas. Although we attempt to comply with changing legislative and regulatory requirements, there is a risk that we will fail to adapt to any such changes successfully or on a timely basis. Compliance with, or changes to, the requirements under these legal and regulatory regimes, including those proposed or implemented under the Biden administration, may cause the Company may adversely impact our businesses, results of operations, liquidity, financial condition and cash flows.

33
Table of Contents
Our businesses are subject to numerous state and federal laws (including, but not limited to, PURA, the Federal Power Act, the Atomic Energy Act, the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Clean Water Act (CWA), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and the Consumer Protection Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act), changing governmental policy and regulatory actions (including those of the FERC, the NERC, the RCT, the MSHA, the EPA, the NRC, the DOJ, the FTC, the CFTC, state public utility commissions and state environmental regulatory agencies), and the rules, guidelines and protocols of ERCOT, CAISO, ISO-NE, MISO, NYISO and PJM with respect to various matters, including, but not limited to, market structure and design, operation of nuclear generation facilities, construction and operation of other generation facilities, development, operation and reclamation of lignite mines, recovery of costs and investments, decommissioning costs, market behavior rules, present or prospective wholesale and retail competition, administrative pricing mechanisms (and adjustments thereto), rates for wholesale sales of electricity, mandatory reliability standards and environmental matters. We, along with other market participants, are subject to electricity pricing constraints and market behavior and other competition-related rules and regulations under PURA. Additionally, Ambit’s direct selling business (i) could be found by federal, state or foreign regulators not to be in compliance with applicable law or regulations, which may lead to our inability to obtain or maintain a license, permit, or similar certification and (ii) may be required to alter its compensation practices in order to comply with applicable federal or state law or regulations. Changes in, revisions to, or reinterpretations of, existing laws and regulations may have a material adverse effect on our businesses, results of operations, liquidity, financial condition and cash flows.

As a result of the recent weather events in Texas there have been several announced efforts by both federal and state government and regulatory agencies to investigate and determine the causes of this event. We have received a civil investigative demand from the Attorney General of Texas as well as a request for information from ERCOT related to this event and may receive additional inquiries. We are cooperating with these entities and are working to respond to these requests. Those efforts may result in changes in regulations that impact our industry and businesses including, but not limited to, additional requirements for winterization of various facets of the electricity supply chain including generation, transmission, and fuel supply; improvements in coordination among the various participants in the electricity supply chain during any future event; potential changes to the types of plans permitted to be marketed to residential customers; potential revisions to the way in which the ERCOT market compensates and incentivizes the continued operation of assets that only run periodically, including during this event or other times of scarcity; and other potential corrective actions that may be taken by the State of Texas, ERCOT, the RCT, or the PUCT to resettle pricing across any portion of the supply chain (i.e., fuel supply and wholesale pricing of generation, or allocating the financial impacts of market-wide load shed ratably across all retail market participants). Recently announced or future legal proceedings, regulatory actions, investigations, or other administrative proceedings involving market participants may result lead to adverse determinations or other findings of violations of laws, rules or regulations, any of which may impact the ability of market participants to satisfy, in whole or in part, their respective obligations. We are continuing to monitor and evaluate the impacts of this developing situation but at this time we cannot estimate the likelihood or impacts of any legislative or regulatory changes or actions (including enforcement actions that may be brought against various market participants) that may occur as a result of the event on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows,. See Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a discussion of the expected impacts of winter storm Uri.

Finally, the regulatory environment has undergone significant changes in the last several years due to state and federal policies affecting wholesale and retail competition and the creation of incentives for the addition of large amounts of new renewable generation. For example, changes to, or development of, legislation that requires the use of clean renewable and alternate fuel sources or mandate the implementation of energy conservation programs that require the implementation of new technologies, could increase our capital expenditures and/or impact our financial condition. Additionally, in some retail energy markets, state legislators, government agencies and other interested parties have made proposals to change the use of market-based pricing, re-regulate areas of these markets that have previously been competitive, or permit electricity delivery companies to construct or acquire generating facilities. Other proposals to re-regulate the retail energy industry may be made, and legislative or other actions affecting electricity and natural gas deregulation or restructuring process may be delayed, discontinued or reversed in states in which we currently operate or may in the future operate. If such changes were to be enacted by a regulatory body, we may lose customers, incur higher costs and/or find it more difficult to acquire new customers. These changes are ongoing, and we cannot predict the future design of the wholesale power markets or the ultimate effect that the changing regulatory environment will have on our business.

34
Table of Contents
We are required to obtain, and to comply with, government permits and approvals.

We are required to obtain, and to comply with, numerous permits and licenses from federal, state and local governmental agencies. The process of obtaining and renewing necessary permits and licenses can be lengthy and complex and can sometimes result in the establishment of conditions that make the project or activity for which the permit or license was sought unprofitable or otherwise unattractive. In addition, such permits or licenses may be subject to denial, revocation or modification under various circumstances. Failure to obtain or comply with the conditions of permits or licenses, or failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, may result in the delay or temporary suspension of our operations and electricity sales or the curtailment of our delivery of electricity to our customers and may subject us to penalties and other sanctions. Although various regulators routinely renew existing permits and licenses, renewal of our existing permits or licenses could be denied or jeopardized by various factors, including (a) failure to provide adequate financial assurance for closure, (b) failure to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations or permit conditions, (c) local community, political or other opposition and (d) executive, legislative or regulatory action.

Our inability to procure and comply with the permits and licenses required for our operations, or the cost to us of such procurement or compliance, could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, new environmental legislation or regulations, if enacted, or changed interpretations of existing laws, may cause activities at our facilities to need to be changed to avoid violating applicable laws and regulations or elicit claims that historical activities at our facilities violated applicable laws and regulations. In addition to the possible imposition of fines in the case of any such violations, we may be required to undertake significant capital investments and obtain additional operating permits or licenses, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our cost of compliance with existing and new environmental laws could have a material adverse effect on us.

We are subject to extensive environmental regulation by governmental authorities, including federal and state environmental agencies and/or attorneys general. We may incur significant additional costs beyond those currently contemplated to comply with these regulatory requirements. If we fail to comply with these regulatory requirements, we could be subject to administrative, civil or criminal liabilities and fines. Existing environmental regulations could be revised or reinterpreted, new laws and regulations could be adopted or become applicable to us or our facilities, and future changes in environmental laws and regulations could occur, including potential regulatory and enforcement developments related to air emissions, all of which could result in significant additional costs beyond those currently contemplated to comply with existing requirements. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on us.

The EPA has recently finalized or proposed several regulatory actions establishing new requirements for control of certain emissions from sources, including electricity generation facilities. In the future, the EPA may also propose and finalize additional regulatory actions that may adversely affect our existing generation facilities or our ability to cost-effectively develop new generation facilities. There is no assurance that the currently installed emissions control equipment at our lignite, coal and/or natural gas-fueled generation facilities will satisfy the requirements under any future EPA or state environmental regulations. Some of the recent regulatory actions, such as the EPA's proposed Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Update, the ACE rule and any proposed or future actions to replace the ACE rule, and actions under the Regional Haze program, could require us to install significant additional control equipment, resulting in potentially material costs of compliance for our generation units, including capital expenditures, higher operating and fuel costs and potential production curtailments. These costs could have a material adverse effect on us.

We may not be able to obtain or maintain all required environmental regulatory approvals. If there is a delay in obtaining any required environmental regulatory approvals, if we fail to obtain, maintain or comply with any such approval or if an approval is retroactively disallowed or adversely modified, the operation of our generation facilities could be stopped, disrupted, curtailed or modified or become subject to additional costs. Any such stoppage, disruption, curtailment, modification or additional costs could have a material adverse effect on us.

In addition, we may be responsible for any on-site liabilities associated with the environmental condition of facilities that we have acquired, leased, developed or sold, regardless of when the liabilities arose and whether they are now known or unknown. In connection with certain acquisitions and sales of assets, we may obtain, or be required to provide, indemnification against certain environmental liabilities. Another party could, depending on the circumstances, assert an environmental claim against us or fail to meet its indemnification obligations to us, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

35
Table of Contents
We could be materially and adversely affected if new federal or state legislation or regulations are adopted to address global climate change that could require efforts that exceed or are more expensive than our currently planned initiatives or if we are subject to lawsuits for alleged damage to persons or property resulting from greenhouse gas emissions.

There is attention and interest nationally and internationally about global climate change and how GHG emissions, such as CO2, contribute to global climate change. Over the last several years, the U.S. Congress has considered and debated several proposals intended to address climate change using different approaches, including a cap on carbon emissions with emitters allowed to trade unused emission allowances (cap-and-trade), a tax on carbon or GHG emissions, incentives for the development of low-carbon technology and federal renewable portfolio standards. In July 2019, the EPA finalized the ACE rule that developed emissions guidelines that states must use when developing plans to regulate GHG emissions from existing coal-fueled electric generating units. In January 2021, the ACE rule was vacated by the D.C. Circuit Court and remanded to the EPA for further consideration in accordance with the court’s ruling. The EPA may develop a more stringent and more encompassing rule to replace the ACE rule in its remand proceeding and has been directed by the Biden Administration to review this rule and others promulgated by the EPA during the Trump Administration. Prior to the vacatur and remand, states where we operate coal plants (Texas, Illinois and Ohio) had begun the development of their state plans to comply with the now-vacated ACE rule. In January 2021, the ACE rule was invalidated by the D.C. Circuit Court. In addition, a number of federal court cases have been filed in recent years asserting damage claims related to GHG emissions, and the results in those proceedings could establish adverse precedent that might apply to companies (including us) that produce GHG emissions. We could be materially and adversely affected if new federal and/or state legislation or regulations are adopted to address global climate change that could require efforts that exceed or are more expensive than our currently planned initiatives or if we are subject to lawsuits for alleged damage to persons or property resulting from GHG emissions.

Additionally, in January 2021, President Biden issued written notification to the United Nations of the U.S.'s intention to rejoin the Paris Agreement, effective in February 2021. Although the Paris Agreement does not create any binding obligations for nations to limit their GHG emissions, it does include pledges to voluntarily limit or reduce future emissions, and various corporations, investors and U.S. states and local governments have previously pledged to further the goals of the Paris Agreement. Additionally, the Biden Administration has directed certain agencies to submit a plan to the National Climate Task Force to achieve a carbon-pollution-free electricity sector by 2035. The Company's plan to transition to clean power generation sources and reduce its GHG emissions may not be completed in this timeframe and we may not otherwise achieve our sustainability and emissions reduction targets as expected. Accordingly, we may be required to accelerate or change our targets, incur additional expenses, and/or adjust or cease certain operations as a result of newly implemented federal and/or state regulations to reduce future carbon emissions.

The Capacity Performance product in the PJM market and the Pay-for-Performance mechanism in ISO-NE could lead to substantial changes in capacity income and non-performance penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Both ISO-NE and PJM operate a pay-for-performance model where capacity payments are modified based on real-time generator performance. Capacity market prices are sensitive to design parameters, as well as additions of new capacity. We may experience substantial changes in capacity income and non-performance penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Luminant's mining operations are subject to RCT oversight.

We currently own and operate, or are in the process of reclaiming, 12 surface lignite coal mines in Texas to provide fuel for our electricity generation facilities. We also own or lease, and are in the process of reclaiming, two waste-to-energy surface facilities in Pennsylvania. The RCT, which exercises broad authority to regulate reclamation activity, reviews on an ongoing basis whether Luminant is compliant with RCT rules and regulations and whether it has met all the requirements of its mining permits. Any new rules and regulations adopted by the RCT or the Department of Interior Office of Surface Mining, which also regulates mining activity nationwide, or any changes in the interpretation of existing rules and regulations, could result in higher compliance costs or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition or cause a revocation of a mining permit. Any revocation of a mining permit would mean that Luminant would no longer be allowed to mine lignite at the applicable mine to serve its generation facilities.

36
Table of Contents
Luminant's lignite mining reclamation activity will require significant resources as existing and retired mining operations are reclaimed over the next several years.

In conjunction with Luminant's announcements in 2017 to retire several power generation assets and related mining operations, along with the continuous reclamation activity at its continuing mining operations for its mines related to the Oak Grove and Martin Lake generation assets, Luminant is expected to spend a significant amount of money, internal resources and time to complete the required reclamation activities. For the next five years, Vistra is projected to spend approximately $301 million (on a nominal basis) to achieve its reclamation objectives.

Litigation, legal proceedings, regulatory investigations or other administrative proceedings could expose us to significant liabilities and reputational damage that could have a material adverse effect on us.

We are involved in the ordinary course of business in a number of lawsuits involving, among other matters, employment, commercial, and environmental issues, and other claims for injuries and damages. We evaluate litigation claims and legal proceedings to assess the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes and to estimate, if possible, the amount of potential losses. Based on these evaluations and estimates, when required by applicable accounting rules, we establish reserves and disclose the relevant litigation claims or legal proceedings, as appropriate. These evaluations and estimates are based on the information available to management at the time and involve a significant amount of judgment. Actual outcomes or losses may differ materially from current evaluations and estimates. The settlement or resolution of such claims or proceedings may have a material adverse effect on us. We use appropriate means to contest litigation threatened or filed against us, but the litigation environment poses a significant business risk.

We are also involved in the ordinary course of business in regulatory investigations and other administrative proceedings, and we are exposed to the risk that we may become the subject of additional regulatory investigations or administrative proceedings. While we cannot predict the outcome of any regulatory investigation or administrative proceeding, any such regulatory investigation or administrative proceeding could result in us incurring material penalties and/or other costs and have a materially adverse effect on us.

Our retail businesses, which each have REP certifications that are subject to review of the public utility commissions in the states in which we operate, are subject to changing state rules and regulations that could have a material impact on the profitability of our business.

The competitiveness of our U.S. retail businesses partially depends on state regulatory policies that establish the structure, rules, terms and conditions on which services are offered to retail customers. Specifically, the public utility commissions and/or the attorney generals of the various jurisdictions in which the Retail segment operates may at any time initiate an investigation into whether our retail operations comply with certain commission rules or state laws and whether we have met the requirements for REP certification, including financial requirements. These state policies and investigations, which can include controls on the retail rates our retail businesses can charge, the imposition of additional costs on sales, restrictions on our ability to obtain new customers through various marketing channels and disclosure requirements, investigations into whether our retail operations comply with certain commission rules or state laws and whether we have met the requirements for REP certification, including financial requirements, can affect the competitiveness of our retail businesses. Any removal or revocation of a REP certification would mean that we would no longer be allowed to provide electricity service to retail customers in the applicable jurisdiction, and such decertification could have a material adverse effect on us. Additionally, state or federal imposition of net metering or renewable portfolio standard programs can make it more or less expensive for retail customers to supplement or replace their reliance on grid power. Our retail businesses have limited ability to influence development of these state rules, regulations and policies, and our business model may be more or less effective, depending on changes to the regulatory environment.

37
Table of Contents
Operational Risks

Volatile power supply costs and demand for power have and could in the future adversely affect the financial performance of our retail businesses.


Although we are the primary provider of our retail businesses' wholesale electricity supply requirements, our retail businesses purchase a significant portion of their supply requirements from third parties. As a result, the financial performance of our retail business depends on their ability to obtain adequate supplies of electric generation from third parties at prices below the prices they charge their customers. Consequently, our earnings and cash flows could be adversely affected in any period in which the retail businesses' wholesale electricity supply costs rise at a greater rate than the rates they charge to customers. The price of wholesale electricity supply purchases associated with the retail businesses' energy commitments can be different than that reflected in the rates charged to customers due to, among other factors:


•varying supply procurement contracts used and the timing of entering into related contracts;
•subsequent changes in the overall price of natural gas;
•daily, monthly or seasonal fluctuations in the price of natural gas relative to the 12-month forward prices;
•transmission constraints and the Company's ability to move power to our customers,customers;
•out-of-market payments, uplifts, or other non-pass through charges, and
•changes in market heat rate.


The retail businesses' earnings and cash flows could also be adversely affected in any period in which their customers' actual usage of electricity significantly varies from the forecasted usage, which could occur due to, among other factors, weather events, competition and economic conditions. See Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a discussion of the expected impacts of winter storm Uri.


Our retail operations are subject to significant competition from other REPs, which could result in a loss of existing customers and the inability to attract new customers.


We operate in a very competitive retail market and, as a result, our retail operation faces significant competition for customers. We believe our TXU EnergyTM, Homefield Energy and Dynegy Energy Services brands are viewed favorably in the retail electricity markets in which we operate, but despite our commitment to providing superior customer service and innovative products, customer sentiment toward our brands, including by comparison to our competitors' brands, depends on certain factors beyond our control. For example, competitor REPs may offer different products, lower electricity prices and other incentives, which, despite our long-standing relationship with many customers, may attract customers away from us. If we are unable to successfully compete with competitors in the retail market it is possible our retail customer counts could decline, which could have a material adverse effect on us.


As we try to grow our retail business and operate our business strategy, we compete with various other REPs that may have certain advantages over us. For example, in new markets, our principal competitor for new customers may be the incumbent REP, which has the advantage of long-standing relationships with its customers, including well-known brand recognition. In addition to competition from the incumbent REP, we may face competition from a number of other energy service providers, other energy industry participants, or nationally branded providers of consumer products and services who may develop businesses that will compete with us. Some of these competitors or potential competitors may be larger than we are or have greater resources or access to capital than we have. If there is inadequate potential margin in retail electricity markets with substantial competition to overcome the adverse effect of relatively high customer acquisition costs in such markets, it may not be profitable for us to compete in these markets.



38
Table of Contents
Our retail operations rely on the infrastructure of local utilities or independent transmission system operators to provide electricity to, and to obtain information about, our customers. Any infrastructure failure could negatively impact customer satisfaction and could have a material adverse effect on us.


With the exceptionThe substantial majority of Electric Energy, Inc. (EEI), which we acquired in the Merger and which owns and controls transmission lines interconnecting our Joppa facility in EEI’s control to MISO, Tennessee Valley Authority and Louisville Gas and Electric Company, our retail operations depend on transmission and distribution facilities owned and operated by unaffiliated utilities to deliver the electricity that we sell to our customers. If transmission capacity is inadequate, our ability to sell and deliver electricity may be hindered and we may have to forgo sales or buy more expensive wholesale electricity than is available in the capacity-constrained area or, with respect to capacity performance in PJM and performance incentives in ISO-NE, we may be subject to significant penalties. For example, during some periods, transmission access is constrained in some areas of the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex, where we have a significant number of customers. The cost to provide service to these customers may exceed the cost to provide service to other customers, resulting in lower operating margins. In addition, any infrastructure failure that interrupts or impairs delivery of electricity to our customers could negatively impact customer satisfaction with our service. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on us.


The operation of our businesses is subject to cyber-based security and integrity risk. Attacks on our infrastructure that breach cyber/data security measures could expose us to significant liabilities, and reputationreputational damage, regulatory action, and disrupt business operations, which could have a material adverse effect on us.


Numerous functions affecting the efficient operation of our businesses are dependent on the secure and reliable storage, processing and communication of electronic data and the use of sophisticated computer hardware and software systems and much of our information technology infrastructure is connected (directly or indirectly) to the internet. There have been numerous attacks on government and industryOur information technology systems through the internet that have resulted in material operational, reputation and/and infrastructure, and those of our vendors and suppliers, are susceptible to damage, disruptions, or financial costs.shutdowns due to power outages, hardware failures, programming errors, defects or other vulnerabilities, cyber-attacks, ransomware attacks, malware attacks, computer viruses, theft, misconduct by employees or other insiders, telecommunications failures, misuse, human errors or other catastrophic events. While we have controls in place designed to protect our infrastructure, such breaches and wethreats are not aware of any significant breaches in the past, abecoming increasingly sophisticated, complex, change frequently and may be difficult to detect. Any such breach, of cyber/data security measuresdisruption or similar event that impairs our information technology infrastructure could disrupt normal business operations and affect our ability to control our generation assets, access retail customer information and limit communication with third parties. Any loss of confidential or proprietary data through a breach could adversely affect our reputation, expose us to material legal or regulatory claims and impair our ability to execute our business strategy,parties, which could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, we may experience increased capital and operating costs to implement increased security for our information technology infrastructure and plants.


As part of the continuing development of new and modified reliability standards, the FERC has approved changes to its Critical Infrastructure Protection reliability standards and has established standards for assets identified as "critical cyber assets." Under the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the FERC can impose penalties (up to $1 million per day, per violation) for failure to comply with mandatory electric reliability standards, including standards to protect the power system against potential disruptions from cyber/data and physical security breaches.


Further, our retail business requires us to access, tocollect, store and transmit sensitive customer data in the ordinary course of business. Concerns about data privacy have led to increased regulation and other actions that could impact our businesses. Examples of sensitive customer data are names, addresses, account information, historical electricity usage, expected patterns of use, payment history, credit bureau data, credit and debit card account numbers, drivers' license numbers, social security numbers and bank account information. Our retail business may need to provide sensitive customer data to vendors and service providers who require access to this information in order to provide services, such as call center operations, to the retail business. IfAlthough we take precautions to protect the sensitive customer data that we are required to collect in order to conduct our business, if a significant breach of our information technology systems were to occur, the reputation of our retail business may be adversely affected, customer confidence may be diminished, and our retail business may be subject to substantial legal or regulatory claims, any of which may contribute to the loss of customers and have a material adverse effect on us. Any loss of customer, confidential, or proprietary data through a breach, unauthorized access, disruption, misuse or disclosure could adversely affect our reputation, expose us to material legal or regulatory claims and impair our ability to execute our business strategy, which could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, we may experience increased capital and operating costs to implement increased security for our information technology infrastructure. We cannot provide any assurance that such events and impacts will not be material in the future, and our efforts to deter, identify and mitigate future breaches may require additional significant capital and may not be successful.


39
Table of Contents
We may suffer material losses, costs and liabilities due to operation risks, regulatory risks, and the risk of nuclear accidents arising from the ownership and operation of the Comanche Peak nuclear generation facility.


We own and operate a nuclear generation facility in Glen Rose, Texas (Comanche Peak Facility). The ownership and operation of a nuclear generation facility involves certain risks. These risks include:


•unscheduled outages or unexpected costs due to equipment, mechanical, structural, cybersecurity or other problems;
•inadequacy or lapses in maintenance protocols;
•the impairment of reactor operation and safety systems due to human error or force majeure;
•the costs of, and liabilities relating to, storage, handling, treatment, transport, release, use and disposal of radioactive materials;
•the costs of procuring nuclear fuel;

•the costs of storing and maintaining spent nuclear fuel at our on-site dry cask storage facility;
•terrorist or cybersecurity attacks and the cost to protect against any such attack;
•the impact of a natural disaster;
•limitations on the amounts and types of insurance coverage commercially available,available; and
•uncertainties with respect to the technological and financial aspects of modifying or decommissioning nuclear facilities at the end of their useful lives.


Any prolonged unavailability of the Comanche Peak Facility could have a material adverse effect on our results of operation, cash flows, financial position and reputation. The following are among the more significant related risks:


•Operational Risk — Operations at any generation facility could degrade to the point where the facility would have to be shut down. If such degradations were to occur at the Comanche Peak Facility, the process of identifying and correcting the causes of the operational downgrade to return the facility to operation could require significant time and expense, resulting in both lost revenue and increased fuel and purchased power expense to meet supply commitments. Furthermore, a shut-down or failure at any other nuclear generation facility could cause regulators to require a shut-down or reduced availability at the Comanche Peak Facility.
•Regulatory Risk — The NRC may modify, suspend or revoke licenses and impose civil penalties for failure to comply with the Atomic Energy Act, the regulations under it or the terms of the licenses of nuclear generation facilities. Unless extended, as to which no assurance can be given, the NRC operating licenses for the two licensed operating units at the Comanche Peak Facility will expire in 2030 and 2033, respectively. Changes in regulations by the NRC, as well as any extension of our operating licenses, could require a substantial increase in capital expenditures or result in increased operating or decommissioning costs.
•Nuclear Accident Risk — Although the safety record of the Comanche Peak Facility and other nuclear generation facilities generally has been very good, accidents and other unforeseen problems have occurred both in the U.S. and elsewhere. The consequences of an accident can be severe and include loss of life, injury, lasting negative health impacts and property damage. Any accident, or perceived accident, could result in significant liabilities and damage our reputation. Any such resulting liability from a nuclear accident could exceed our resources, including insurance coverage, and could ultimately result in the suspension or termination of power generation from the Comanche Peak Facility.

40

Table of Contents
The operation and maintenance of power generation facilities and related mining operations are capital intensive and involve significant risks that could adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.


The operation and maintenance of power generation facilities and related mining operations involve many risks, including, as applicable, start-up risks, breakdown or failure of facilities, equipment or processes, operator error, lack of sufficient capital to maintain the facilities, the dependence on a specific fuel source, the inability to transport our product to our customers in an efficient manner due to the lack of transmission capacity or the impact of unusual or adverse weather conditions or other natural events, or terrorist attacks, as well as the risk of performance below expected levels of output, efficiency or reliability, the occurrence of any of which could result in substantial lost revenues and/or increased expenses. A significant number of our facilities were constructed many years ago. Older generating equipment, even if maintained or refurbished in accordance with good engineering practices, may require significant capital expenditures to operate at peak efficiency or reliability. The risk of increased maintenance and capital expenditures arises from (a) increased starting and stopping of generation equipment due to the volatility of the competitive generation market and the prospect of continuing low wholesale electricity prices that may not justify sustained or year-round operation of all our generation facilities, (b) any unexpected failure to generate power, including failure caused by equipment breakdown or unplanned outage (whether by order of applicable governmental regulatory authorities, the impact of weather events or natural disasters or otherwise), (c) damage to facilities due to storms, natural disasters, wars, terrorist or cyber/data security acts and other catastrophic events and (d) the passage of time and normal wear and tear. Further, our ability to successfully and timely complete routine maintenance or other capital projects at our existing facilities is contingent upon many variables and subject to substantial risks. Should any such efforts be unsuccessful, we could be subject to additional costs or losses and write downs of our investment in the project.


We cannot be certain of the level of capital expenditures that will be required due to changing environmental and safety laws and regulations (including changes in the interpretation or enforcement thereof), needed facility repairs and unexpected events (such as natural disasters or terrorist or cyber/data security attacks). The unexpected requirement of large capital expenditures could have a material adverse effect on us. Moreover, if we significantly modify a unit, we may be required to install the best available control technology or to achieve the lowest achievable emission rates as such terms are defined under the new source review provisions of the CAA, which would likely result in substantial additional capital expenditures.



In addition, unplanned outages at any of our generation facilities, whether because of equipment breakdown or otherwise, typically increase our operation and maintenance expenses and may reduce our revenues as a result of selling fewer MWh or non-performance penalties or require us to incur significant costs as a result of running one of our higher cost units or to procure replacement power at spot market prices in order to fulfill contractual commitments. If we do not have adequate liquidity to meet margin and collateral requirements, we may be exposed to significant losses, may miss significant opportunities and may have increased exposure to the volatility of spot markets, which could have a material adverse effect on us. Further, our inability to operate our generation facilities efficiently, manage capital expenditures and costs, and generate earnings and cash flowflows from our asset-based businesses could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. While we maintain insurance, obtain warranties from vendors and obligate contractors to meet certain performance levels, the proceeds of such insurance, warranties or performance guarantees may not be adequate to cover our lost revenues, increased expenses or liquidated damages payments should we experience equipment breakdown or non-performance by contractors or vendors.


Operation of power generation facilities involves significant risks and hazards customary to the power industry that could have a material adverse effect on Vistra Energy'sour revenues and results of operations, and Vistra Energywe may not have adequate insurance to cover these risks and hazards. Our employees, contractors, customers and the general public may be exposed to a risk of injury due to the nature of our operations.


Power generation involves hazardous activities, including acquiring, transporting and unloading fuel, operating large pieces of equipment and delivering electricity to transmission and distribution systems. In addition to natural risks such as extreme weather, earthquake, flood, lightning, hurricane and wind, other human-made hazards, such as nuclear accidents, dam failure, gas or other explosions, mine area collapses, fire, structural collapse, machinery failure and other dangerous incidents are inherent risks in our operations. These and other hazards can cause significant personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property, plant and equipment, contamination of, or damage to, the environment and suspension of operations. Further, our employees and contractors work in, and customers and the general public may be exposed to, potentially dangerous environments at or near our operations. As a result, employees, contractors, customers and the general public are at risk for serious injury, including loss of life.


41
Table of Contents
The occurrence of any one of these events may result in us being named as a defendant in lawsuits asserting claims for substantial damages, including for environmental cleanup costs, personal injury and property damage and fines and/or penalties. We maintain an amount of insurance protection that we consider adequate, but we cannot provide any assurance that our insurance will be sufficient or effective under all circumstances and against all hazards or liabilities to which we may be subject and, even if we do have insurance coverage for a particular circumstance, we may be subject to a large deductible and maximum cap. A successful claim for which we are not fully insured could hurt our financial results and materially harm our financial condition. Further, due to rising insurance costs and changes in the insurance markets, including increasing pressure on firms that provide insurance to companies that own and operate fossil fuel generation, we cannot provide any assurance that our insurance coverage will continue to be available at all or at rates or on terms similar to those presently available. Any losses not covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.


We may be materially and adversely affected by obligations to comply with federal and state regulations, laws, and other legal requirements that govern the operations, assessments, storage, closure, corrective action, disposal and monitoring relating to CCR.

As a result of electricity produced for decades at coal-fueled power plants in Illinois, Texas and Ohio, we manage large amounts of CCR material in surface impoundments, all in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. In addition to the federal requirements under the CCR rule, CCR surface impoundments will continue to be regulated by existing state laws, regulations and permits, as well as additional legal requirements that may be imposed in the future. These federal and state laws, regulations and other legal requirements may require or result in additional expenditures, increased operating and maintenance costs and/or result in closure of certain power generating facilities, which could affect the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Company. We have recognized ARO related to these CCR-related requirements. As the closure and CCR management work progresses and final closure plans and corrective action measures are developed and approved at each site, the scope and complexity of work and the amount of CCR material could be greater than current estimates and could, therefore, materially impact earnings through increased compliance expenditures.

The EPA is reviewing applications submitted by us to extend closure deadlines for many of our CCR impoundments. The EPA has been directed by the Biden Administration to review a number of environmental rules adopted by the EPA during the Trump Administration, including Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) rule, the Emissions Limitation Guidelines (ELG) rule, the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule and the PM and Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) rules. All of these rules may significantly and adversely impact our existing coal fleet and may lead to accelerated plant closure timeframes. In addition, the expected revisions to the ACE rule and NAAQS also have the potential to adversely impact our gas-fired units.

The EPA is reviewing applications submitted by us to extend closure deadlines for many of our CCR impoundments. The scope and cost of that closure work could increase significantly based on new requirements imposed by the EPA or state agencies. There is no assurance that our current assumptions for closure activities will be accepted by EPA. If ponds must be closed sooner than anticipated, plant closures timeframes may be accelerated.

The availability and cost of emission allowances could adversely impact our costs of operations.

We are required to maintain, through either allocations or purchases, sufficient emission allowances for SO2, CO2 and NOX to support our operations in the ordinary course of operating our power generation facilities. These allowances are used to meet the obligations imposed on us by various applicable environmental laws. If our operational needs require more than our allocated allowances, we may be forced to purchase such allowances on the open market, which could be costly. If we are unable to maintain sufficient emission allowances to match our operational needs, we may have to curtail our operations so as not to exceed our available emission allowances or install costly new emission controls. As we use the emission allowances that we have purchased on the open market, costs associated with such purchases will be recognized as operating expense. If such allowances are available for purchase, but only at significantly higher prices, the purchase of such allowances could materially increase our costs of operations in the affected markets.

42
Table of Contents
We may be materially and adversely affected by the effects of extreme weather conditions and seasonality.


We may be materially affected by weather conditions and our businesses may fluctuate substantially on a seasonal basis as the weather changes. In addition, we could beare subject to the effects of extreme weather conditions, including sustained or extreme cold or hot temperatures, hurricanes, floods, storms, fires, earthquakes or other natural disasters, which could stress our generation facilities and grid reliability, limit our ability to procure adequate fuel supply, or result in outages, damage or destroy our assets and result in casualty losses that are not ultimately offset by insurance proceeds, and could require increased capital expenditures or maintenance costs, including supply chain costs.


Moreover, an extreme weather event could cause disruption in service to customers due to downed wires and poles or damage to other operating equipment, which could result in us foregoing sales of electricity and lost revenue. Similarly, ancertain extreme weather event mightevents have previously affected, and may in the future, affect, the availability of generation and transmission capacity, limiting our ability to source or deliver power where it is needed or limit our ability to source fuel for our plants, (includingincluding due to damage to rail or natural gas pipeline infrastructure).infrastructure. Additionally, extreme weather has resulted, and may in the future result, in (i) unexpected increases in customer load, requiring our retail operation to procure additional electricity supplies at wholesale prices in excess of customer sales prices for electricity, (ii) the failure of equipment at our generation facilities, (iii) a decrease in the availability of, or increases in the cost of, fuel sources, including natural gas, diesel and coal, or (iv) unpredictable curtailment of customer load by the applicable ISO/RTO in order to maintain grid reliability, resulting in the realization of lower wholesale prices or retail customer sales. See Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a discussion of the expected impacts of winter storm Uri.

Additionally, climate change may produce changes in weather or other environmental conditions, including temperature or precipitation levels, and thus may impact consumer demand for electricity. TheseIn addition, the potential physical effects of climate change, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, floods, and other climatic events, could disrupt our operations and cause us to incur significant costs to prepare for or respond to these effects.

Weather conditions, which cannot be reliably predicted, could have adverse consequences by requiring us to seek additional sources of electricity when wholesale market prices are high or to sell excess electricity when market prices are low, as well as significantly limiting the supply of, or increasing the cost of our fuel supply, each of which could have a material adverse effect on us.our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.



The outbreak of COVID-19, or the future outbreak of any other highly infectious or contagious diseases, could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has adversely impacted economic activity and conditions worldwide, and we are responding to the outbreak by taking steps to mitigate the potential risks to us posed by its spread. We continue to examine the impacts of the pandemic on our workforce, liquidity, reliability, cybersecurity, customers, suppliers, along with other macroeconomic conditions and cannot currently predict whether COVID-19 will have a material impact on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

Because we are deemed a critical infrastructure provider that provides a critical service to our customers, we must keep our employees who operate our businesses safe and minimize unnecessary risk of exposure. We have updated and implemented our company-wide pandemic plan to address specific aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic. This plan guides our emergency response, business continuity, and the precautionary measures we are taking on behalf of employees and the public. We will continue to monitor developments affecting both our workforce and our customers, and we will take additional precautions that we determine are necessary in order to mitigate the impacts. In particular, we have taken extra precautions for our employees who work in the field and for employees who continue to work in our facilities including requiring, for both employees and contractors, social distancing where possible and requiring the use of appropriate personal protective equipment in certain circumstances. We have implemented work-from-home policies and other safety measures where appropriate, including, but not limited to, temperature testing at all of our locations for employees, contractors, and other essential visitors and closing our facilities to non-essential visitors. While our systems and operations remain vulnerable to cyber-attacks and other disruptions due in part to the fact that a portion of our workforce continues to work remotely, we have implemented physical and cyber-security measures to ensure that our systems remain functional in order to both serve our operational needs with a remote workforce and keep them running to ensure uninterrupted service to our customers. We will continue to review and modify our plans as conditions change.

43
Table of Contents
Measures to control the spread of COVID-19, including restrictions on travel, public gatherings, and certain business operations, have affected the demand for the products and services of many businesses in the areas in which we operate and disrupted supply chains around the world. The full scope and extent of the impacts of COVID-19 on our operations are unknown at this time. However, COVID-19 or another pandemic could have material and adverse effects on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows due to, among other factors, a protracted slowdown of broad sectors of the economy, changes in demand or supply for commodities, significant changes in legislation or regulatory policy to address the pandemic (including moratoriums or conditions or disconnections and limits or restrictions or late fees), reduced demand for electricity (particularly from commercial and industrial customers), increased late or uncollectible customer payments, negative impacts on the health of our workforce, a deterioration of our ability to ensure business continuity (including increased risk from cybersecurity attacks as a result of a significant portion of our workforce continuing to work from home), and the inability of the Company's contractors, suppliers, and other business partners to fulfill their contractual obligations.

Despite our efforts to manage these impacts to the Company, their ultimate impact also depends on factors beyond our knowledge or control, including the duration and severity of this outbreak as well as third-party actions taken to contain its spread and mitigate its public health effects. To the extent COVID-19 adversely affects our business and financial results, it may also have the effect of hastening, heightening, or increasing the negative impacts of, many of the other risks described in this Risk Factors section.

Changes in technology, or increased electricity conservation efforts, or energy sustainability efforts may reduce the value of our generation facilities and may otherwise have a material adverse effect on us.


Technological advances have improved, and are likely to continue to improve, for existing and alternative methods to produce and store power, including gas turbines, wind turbines, fuel cells, hydrogen, micro turbines, photovoltaic (solar) cells, batteries and concentrated solar thermal devices, along with improvements in traditional technologies. Such technological advances may be superior to, or may not be compatible with, some of our existing technologies, investments and infrastructure, and may require us to make significant expenditures to remain competitive, and have reduced,resulted, and are expected to continue to reduce the costs of power production or storage, to a level that will enable these technologies to compete effectively with traditional generation facilities.which may result in the obsolescence of certain of our operating assets. Consequently, the value of our more traditional generation assets could be significantly reduced as a result of these competitive advances, which could have a material adverse effect on us.us and our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to anticipate and successfully adapt to technological changes, to offer services and products that meet customer demands and evolving industry standards. In addition, changes in technology have altered, and are expected to continue to alter, the channels through which retail customers buy electricity (i.e., self-generation or distributed-generation facilities). To the extent self-generation or distributed generation facilities become a more cost-effective option for customers, our financial condition, operating cash flows and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.


Technological advances in demand-side management and increased conservation efforts have resulted, and are expected to continue to result, in a decrease in electricity demand. A significant decrease in electricity demand as a result of such efforts would significantly reduce the value of our generation assets. Certain regulatory and legislative bodies have introduced or are considering requirements and/or incentives to reduce power consumption. Effective power conservation by our customers could result in reduced electricity demand or significantly slow the growth in such demand. Any such reduction in demand could have a material adverse effect on us. Furthermore, we may incur increased capital expenditures if we are required to increase investment in conservation measures. Additionally, increased governmental and consumer focus on energy sustainability efforts, including desire for, or incentives related to, the development, implementation and usage of low-carbon technology, may result in decreased demand for the traditional generation technologies that we currently own and operate.


We may potentially be affected by emerging technologies that may over time affect change in capacity markets and the energy industry overall with the inclusion of distributed generation and clean technology.

Some of these emerging technologies are shale gas production, distributed renewable energy technologies, energy efficiency, broad consumer adoption of electric vehicles, distributed generation and energy storage devices. Such emerging technologies could affect the price of energy, levels of customer-owned generation, customer expectations and current business models and make portions of our electric system power supply and transmission and/or distribution facilities obsolete prior to the end of their useful lives. These emerging technologies may also affect the financial viability of utility counterparties and could have significant impacts on wholesale market prices, which could ultimately have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

44
Table of Contents
The loss of the services of our key management and personnel could adversely affect our ability to successfully operate our businesses.


Our future success will depend on our ability to continue to attract and retain highly qualified personnel. We compete for such personnel with many other companies, in and outside of our industry, government entities and other organizations. We may not be successful in retaining current personnel or in hiring or retaining qualified personnel in the future. Our failure to attract highly qualified new personnel or retain highly qualified existing personnel could have an adverse effect on our ability to successfully operate our businesses. In addition, effective succession planning is important to our long-term success. Failure to timely and effectively ensure transfer of knowledge and smooth transitions involving senior management and other key personnel could hinder our strategic planning and execution.


We could be materially and adversely impacted by strikes or work stoppages by our unionized employees.


As of December 31, 2018,2020, we had approximately 2,0301,640 employees covered by collective bargaining agreements, of which approximately 945 are subject to collective bargaining agreements entered into by Dynegy and assumed by us in the Merger.agreements. The terms of all current collective bargaining agreements covering represented personnel engaged in lignite mining operations, lignite-, coal- and nuclear-fueled generation operation and some of our natural gas-fueled generation operations expire on various dates between March 2019May 2021 and March 2022,November 2023, but remain effective from-year-to-year thereafter unless and until terminated by either party. We are also presently negotiating the terms of first contracts at two of our natural gas-fueled generation facilities. In the event that our union employees strike, participate in a work stoppage or slowdown or engage in other forms of labor strife or disruption, we would be responsible for procuring replacement labor or we could experience reduced power generation or outages. Our ability to procure such labor is uncertain. Strikes, work stoppages or the inability to negotiate current or future collective bargaining agreements on favorable terms or at all could have a material adverse effect on us.


Risks Related to Our Structure and Ownership of our Common Stock


Vistra Energy is a holding company and its ability to obtain funds from its subsidiaries is structurally subordinated to existing and future liabilities and preferred equity of its subsidiaries.


Vistra Energy is a holding company that does not conduct any business operations of its own. As a result, Vistra Energy'sVistra's cash flows and ability to meet its obligations are largely dependent upon the operating cash flows of Vistra Energy'sVistra's subsidiaries and the payment of such operating cash flows to Vistra Energy in the form of dividends, distributions, loans or otherwise. These subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities from Vistra Energy and have no obligation (other than any existing contractual obligations) to provide Vistra Energy with funds to satisfy its obligations. Any decision by a subsidiary to provide Vistra Energy with funds to satisfy its obligations, including those under the TRA, whether by dividends, distributions, loans or otherwise, will depend on, among other things, such subsidiary's results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, cash requirements, contractual prohibitions and other restrictions, applicable law and other factors. The deterioration of income from, or other available assets of, any such subsidiary for any reason could limit or impair its ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to Vistra Energy.Vistra.



Investor focus on environmental, social, and governance issues, including climate change and sustainability matters, could adversely affect our stock price.

Investor focus on environmental, social, and governance issues, including increasing attention on climate change and sustainability matters, could adversely affect, and increase the potential volatility of, our stock price. Certain financial institutions have announced policies to presently or in the future cease investing or to divest investments in companies that derive any or a specified portion of their income from, or have any or a specified portion of their operations in, fossil fuels. To date these represent small fractions of our overall current or potential equity investors, but that group could grow and thus reduce demand for our common stock or otherwise increase volatility in our stock price. The Company’s plan to transition to clean power generation sources and reduce its carbon footprint may not be completed in the timeframe or achieve the targets as expected. Negative investor sentiment toward us and our industry — including concerns over environmental or sustainability matters and potential changes in federal and state regulatory actions related thereto — could have a negative impact on our stock price.

45
Table of Contents
We may not pay any dividends on our common stock in the future.


In November 2018, we announced that the Board had adopted a dividend program pursuant to which we expect to initiate an annual dividend of approximately $0.50 per share, payable quarterly, beginninginitiated in the first quarter of 2019. Each dividend under the program will be subject to declaration by the Board and, thus, may be subject to numerous factors in existence at the time of any such declaration including, but not limited to, prevailing market conditions, our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, contractual prohibitions and other restrictions with respect to the payment of dividends. There is no assurance that the Board will declare, or that we will pay, any dividends on our common stock in the future.


A small number of stockholders could be able to significantly influence or impact our business and affairs.

Three of the largest groups of stockholders of Vistra Energy, affiliates of Brookfield Asset Management Private Institutional Capital Adviser (Canada), L.P. (collectively, the Brookfield Entities), affiliates of Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. (collectively, the Oaktree Entities), and affiliates of Apollo Management Holdings L.P. (collectively, the Apollo Entities, and together with the Brookfield Entities and the Oaktree Entities, the Principal Stockholders), all of which were first lien creditors of our Predecessor prior to Emergence, currently collectively own approximately 26% of our common stock outstanding. Large holders such as the Principal Stockholders may be able to affect matters requiring approval by holders of our common stock, including the election of directors and the approval of any strategic transactions. Furthermore, pursuant to the terms of stockholders' agreements entered into with each of the Brookfield Entities and the Apollo Entities, each such Principal Stockholder is entitled to designate one director to serve on the Board as a Class III director for so long as it beneficially owns, in the aggregate, at least 22,500,000 shares of our common stock.Item 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Additionally, we may be subject, from time to time, to legal and business challenges in the operation of our company due to actions instituted by activist shareholders or others. Responding to such actions, which may include private engagement, publicity campaigns, proxy contests, efforts to force transactions not supported by our Board, and litigation, could be costly and time-consuming, may not align with our strategic plan and could divert the time and attention of our Board and management from our business.


Item 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS


None.




Item 2.PROPERTIES

Item 2.PROPERTIES

Luminant's generationasset fleet consists of power generation and battery ESS units in six RTOs/ISOs,ISOs/RTOs, with the location, RTO/ISO,ISO/RTO, technology, primary fuel type, net capacity and ownership interest for each generation facility shown in the table below:
FacilityLocationISO/RTOTechnologyPrimary Fuel (a)Net Capacity (MW) (b)Ownership Interest (c)
EnnisEnnis, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas366 100%
ForneyForney, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas1,912 100%
HaysSan Marcos, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas1,047 100%
LamarParis, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas1,076 100%
MidlothianMidlothian, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas1,596 100%
OdessaOdessa, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas1,054 100%
WisePoolville, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas787 100%
Martin LakeTatum, TXERCOTSTCoal2,250 100%
Oak GroveFranklin, TXERCOTSTCoal1,600 100%
DeCordovaGranbury, TXERCOTCTNatural Gas260 100%
GrahamGraham, TXERCOTSTNatural Gas630 100%
Lake HubbardDallas, TXERCOTSTNatural Gas921 100%
Morgan CreekColorado City, TXERCOTCTNatural Gas390 100%
Permian BasinMonahans, TXERCOTCTNatural Gas325 100%
Stryker CreekRusk, TXERCOTSTNatural Gas685 100%
TrinidadTrinidad, TXERCOTSTNatural Gas244 100%
Comanche PeakGlen Rose, TXERCOTNuclearNuclear2,300 100%
Upton 2Upton County, TXERCOTSolar/BatteryRenewable180 100%
Total Texas Segment17,623 
FayetteMasontown, PAPJMCCGTNatural Gas726 100%
Hanging RockIronton, OHPJMCCGTNatural Gas1,430 100%
HopewellHopewell, VAPJMCCGTNatural Gas370 100%
KendallMinooka, ILPJMCCGTNatural Gas1,288 100%
LibertyEddystone, PAPJMCCGTNatural Gas607 100%
OntelauneeReading, PAPJMCCGTNatural Gas600 100%
SayrevilleSayreville, NJPJMCCGTNatural Gas349 100%
WashingtonBeverly, OHPJMCCGTNatural Gas711 100%
CalumetChicago, ILPJMCTNatural Gas380 100%
Dicks CreekMonroe, OHPJMCTNatural Gas155 100%
Miami Fort (CT)North Bend, OHPJMCTFuel Oil77 100%
PleasantsSaint Marys, WVPJMCTNatural Gas388 100%
RichlandDefiance, OHPJMCTNatural Gas423 100%
46
Table of Contents
Facility Location RTO/ISO Technology Primary Fuel Net Capacity (MW) (a) Ownership Interest
Ennis Ennis, TX ERCOT CCGT Natural Gas 366
 100%
Forney Forney, TX ERCOT CCGT Natural Gas 1,912
 100%
Hays San Marcos, TX ERCOT CCGT Natural Gas 1,047
 100%
Lamar Paris, TX ERCOT CCGT Natural Gas 1,076
 100%
Midlothian Midlothian, TX ERCOT CCGT Natural Gas 1,596
 100%
Odessa Odessa, TX ERCOT CCGT Natural Gas 1,054
 100%
Wise Poolville, TX ERCOT CCGT Natural Gas 787
 100%
Coleto Creek Goliad, TX ERCOT ST Coal 650
 100%
Martin Lake Tatum, TX ERCOT ST Coal 2,250
 100%
Oak Grove Franklin, TX ERCOT ST Coal 1,600
 100%
DeCordova Granbury, TX ERCOT CT Natural Gas 260
 100%
Graham Graham, TX ERCOT ST Natural Gas 630
 100%
Lake Hubbard Dallas, TX ERCOT ST Natural Gas 921
 100%
Morgan Creek Colorado City, TX ERCOT CT Natural Gas 390
 100%
Permian Basin Monahans, TX ERCOT CT Natural Gas 325
 100%
Stryker Creek Rusk, TX ERCOT ST Natural Gas 685
 100%
Trinidad Trinidad, TX ERCOT ST Natural Gas 244
 100%
Wharton Boling, TX ERCOT CT Natural Gas 83
 100%
Comanche Peak Glen Rose, TX ERCOT Nuclear Nuclear 2,300
 100%
Upton 2 Upton County, TX ERCOT Solar Solar 180
 100%
Upton 2 Battery Storage Upton County, TX ERCOT Battery Battery 10
 100%
Total ERCOT Segment 18,366
 
Fayette Masontown, PA PJM CCGT Natural Gas 726
 100%
Hanging Rock Ironton, OH PJM CCGT Natural Gas 1,430
 100%
Hopewell Hopewell, VA PJM CCGT Natural Gas 370
 100%
Kendall Minooka, IL PJM CCGT Natural Gas 1,288
 100%
Liberty Eddystone, PA PJM CCGT Natural Gas 607
 100%
Ontelaunee Reading, PA PJM CCGT Natural Gas 600
 100%
Sayreville Sayreville, NJ PJM CCGT Natural Gas 170
 50%
Washington Beverly, OH PJM CCGT Natural Gas 711
 100%
Kincaid Kincaid, IL PJM ST Coal 1,108
 100%
Miami Fort 7 & 8 North Bend, OH PJM ST Coal 1,020
 100%
Zimmer Moscow, OH PJM ST Coal 1,300
 100%
Calumet Chicago, IL PJM CT Natural Gas 380
 100%
Dicks Creek Monroe, OH PJM CT Natural Gas 155
 100%
Miami Fort (CT) North Bend, OH PJM CT Oil 77
 100%
Pleasants Saint Marys, WV PJM CT Natural Gas 388
 100%
Richland Defiance, OH PJM CT Natural Gas 423
 100%
Stryker Stryker, OH PJM CT Oil 16
 100%
Total PJM Segment 10,769
  

Facility Location RTO/ISO Technology Primary Fuel Net Capacity (MW) (a) Ownership InterestFacilityLocationISO/RTOTechnologyPrimary Fuel (a)Net Capacity (MW) (b)Ownership Interest (c)
StrykerStrykerStryker, OHPJMCTFuel Oil16 100%
Bellingham Bellingham, MA ISO-NE CCGT Natural Gas 566
 100%BellinghamBellingham, MAISO-NECCGTNatural Gas566 100%
Bellingham NEA Bellingham, MA ISO-NE CCGT Natural Gas 157
 50%
Blackstone Blackstone, MA ISO-NE CCGT Natural Gas 544
 100%BlackstoneBlackstone, MAISO-NECCGTNatural Gas544 100%
Casco Bay Veazie, ME ISO-NE CCGT Natural Gas 543
 100%Casco BayVeazie, MEISO-NECCGTNatural Gas543 100%
Lake RoadLake RoadDayville, CTISO-NECCGTNatural Gas827 100%
MasspowerMasspowerIndian Orchard, MAISO-NECCGTNatural Gas281 100%
MilfordMilfordMilford, CTISO-NECCGTNatural Gas600 100%
Independence Oswego, NY NYISO CCGT Natural Gas 1,212
 100%IndependenceOswego, NYNYISOCCGTNatural Gas1,212 100%
Lake Road Dayville, CT ISO-NE CCGT Natural Gas 827
 100%
MASSPOWER Indian Orchard, MA ISO-NE CCGT Natural Gas 281
 100%
Milford Milford, CT ISO-NE CCGT Natural Gas 600
 100%
Total NY/NE Segment 4,730
 
Total East SegmentTotal East Segment12,093 
Moss Landing 1 & 2Moss Landing 1 & 2Moss Landing, CACAISOCCGTNatural Gas1,020 100%
Moss LandingMoss LandingMoss Landing, CACAISOBatteryRenewable300 100%
OaklandOaklandOakland, CACAISOCTFuel Oil165 100%
Total West SegmentTotal West Segment1,485 
Coleto CreekColeto CreekGoliad, TXERCOTSTCoal650 100%
Baldwin Baldwin, IL MISO ST Coal 1,185
 100%BaldwinBaldwin, ILMISOSTCoal1,185 100%
Havana Havana, IL MISO ST Coal 434
 100%
Hennepin Hennepin, IL MISO ST Coal 294
 100%
Coffeen Coffeen, IL MISO/PJM ST Coal 915
 100%
Duck Creek Canton, IL MISO/PJM ST Coal 425
 100%
Edwards Bartonville, IL MISO/PJM ST Coal 585
 100%EdwardsBartonville, ILMISOSTCoal585 100%
Newton Newton, IL MISO/PJM ST Coal 615
 100%NewtonNewton, ILMISOSTCoal615 100%
Joppa/EEI Joppa, IL MISO ST Coal 802
 80%Joppa/EEIJoppa, ILMISOSTCoal802 80%
Joppa CT 1-3 Joppa, IL MISO CT Natural Gas 165
 100%Joppa CT 1-3Joppa, ILMISOCTNatural Gas165 100%
Joppa CT 4-5 Joppa, IL MISO CT Natural Gas 56
 80%Joppa CT 4-5Joppa, ILMISOCTNatural Gas56 80%
Total MISO Segment 5,476
 
Moss Landing 1 & 2 Moss Landing, CA CAISO CCGT Natural Gas 1,020
 100%
Oakland Oakland, CA CAISO CT Oil 165
 100%
Total CAISO 1,185
 
KincaidKincaidKincaid, ILPJMSTCoal1,108 100%
Miami Fort 7 & 8Miami Fort 7 & 8North Bend, OHPJMSTCoal1,020 100%
ZimmerZimmerMoscow, OHPJMSTCoal1,300 100%
Total Sunset SegmentTotal Sunset Segment7,486 
Total capacityTotal capacity 40,526
 Total capacity38,687 
___________
(a)Unit capabilities are based on winter capacity and are reflected at our net ownership interest. We have not included units that have been retired or are out of operation.

(a)Renewable represents generation assets fueled by renewable sources including energy storage and solar, which do not have significant fuel costs.
(b)Unit capabilities are based on winter capacity and are reflected at our net ownership interest. We have not included units that have been retired or are out of operation.
(c)Ownership interest of 100% indicates fee simple ownership of the facility. Ownership of less than 100% indicates the share of ownership in the facility held by the Company.

See Note 3 to the Financial Statements for discussion of our solar and battery energy storage projects currently under development.

Our wholesale commodity risk management group also procures renewable energy credits from windrenewable generation in ERCOT to support our electricity sales to wholesale and retail customers to satisfy the increasing demand for renewable resources from such customers. As of December 31, 2018,2020, Vistra Energy had long-term power purchase agreements to procure approximately 4801,015 MW of available renewable capacity. These renewable generation sources deliver electricity when conditions make them available, and, when on-line, they generally compete with baseload units. Because they cannot be relied upon to meet demand continuously due to their dependence on weather and time of day, these generation sources are categorized as non-dispatchable and create the need for intermediate/load-following resources to respond to changes in their output.


47
Table of Contents
Fuel Supply


Nuclear— We own and operate two nuclear generation units at the Comanche Peak plant site in ERCOT, each of which is designed for a capacity of 1,150 MW. Comanche Peak Unit 1 and Unit 2 went into commercial operation in 1990 and 1993, respectively, and are generally operated at full capacity. Refueling (nuclear fuel assembly replacement) outages for each unit are scheduled to occur every eighteen months during the spring or fall off-peak demand periods. Every three years, the refueling cycle results in the refueling of both units during the same year, the latest of which occurred during 2017.in 2020. While one unit is undergoing a refueling outage, the remaining unit is intended to operate at full capacity. During a refueling outage, other maintenance, modification and testing activities are completed that cannot be accomplished when the unit is in operation. The Comanche Peak facility operated at a capacity factor of 101%97%, 84%96% and 101% in 2020, 2019 and 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The capacity factor for the year ended December 31, 2017 reflected an unplanned outage at one of the units between June and August 2017.


We have contracts in place for all of our 20192021 and 2020the majority of our 2022 nuclear fuel requirements. We do not anticipate any significant difficulties in acquiring uranium and contracting for associated conversion, enrichment and fabrication services in the foreseeable future.



Natural Gas— Our natural gas-fueled generation fleet is comprised of 23 CCGT generating facilities totaling 19,512 MW and 13 peaking generation facilities totaling 5,022 MW. We satisfy our fuel requirements at these facilities through a combination of spot market and near-term purchase contracts. Additionally, we have near-term natural gas transportation agreements in place to ensure reliable fuel supply.

Coal/Lignite— Our coal/lignite-fueled generation fleet is comprised of 1410 generation facilities totaling 13,18311,115 MW of generation capacity. Maintenance outages at these units are scheduled during the spring or fall off-peak demand periods. We meet our fuel requirements at our coal-fueled generation facilities in PJM and MISO with coal purchased from multiple suppliers under contracts of various lengths and transported to the facilities by either railcar or barges. We meet our fuel requirements in ERCOT using lignite that we mine at the Oak Grove generation facility, coal purchased and transported by railcar at the Coleto Creek generation facility and a blend of lignite that we mine and coal purchased and transported by railcar at our Martin Lake generation facility.


Natural Gas— Our natural gas-fueled generation fleet is comprised of 24 CCGT generating facilities totaling 19,490 MW and 14 peaking generation facilities totaling 5,105 MW. We satisfy our fuel requirements at these facilities through a combination of spot market and near-term purchase contracts. Additionally, we have near-term natural gas transportation agreements in place to ensure reliable fuel supply.


Item 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Item 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


See Note 1513 to the Financial Statements for discussion of litigation, including matters related to our generation facilities and EPA reviews.




Item 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Item 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Vistra Energy currently owns and operates, or is in the process of reclaiming, 12 surface lignite coal mines in Texas to provide fuel for its electricity generation facilities. Vistra Energy also owns or leases, and is in the process of reclaiming, two waste-to-energy surface facilities in Pennsylvania. These mining operations are regulated by the MSHA under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, as amended (the Mine Act), as well as other federal and state regulatory agencies such as the RCT and Office of Surface Mining. The MSHA inspects U.S. mines, including Vistra Energy'sVistra's mines, on a regular basis, and if it believes a violation of the Mine Act or any health or safety standard or other regulation has occurred, it may issue a citation or order, generally accompanied by a proposed fine or assessment. Such citations and orders can be contested and appealed, which often results in a reduction of the severity and amount of fines and assessments and sometimes results in dismissal. Disclosure of MSHA citations, orders and proposed assessments are provided in Exhibit 95.1 to this Annual Reportannual report on Form 10-K.





48
Table of Contents
PART II


Item 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Vistra Energy'sItem 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Vistra's authorized capital stock consists of 1,800,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01 per share.


Since May 10, 2017, Vistra Energy'sVistra's common stock has been listed on the NYSE under the symbol "VST". Upon Emergence and through May 9, 2017, Vistra Energy's common stock was listed on the OTCQX U.S. under the symbol "VSTE".


On April 9, 2018 (Merger Date), pursuant to the Merger Agreement, 94,409,573 shares of Vistra Energy common stock were issued to the former Dynegy stockholders, as well as converting stock options, equity-based awards, tangible equity units and warrants.


As of February 25, 2019,23, 2021, there were 485,894,408483,716,012 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and 630 shareholders698 stockholders of record.


Vistra Energy paid a one-time dividend in the aggregate amount of approximately $1 billion ($2.32 per share of common stock) to holders of record of our common stock on December 19, 2016. In November 2018, we announced that the Board had adopted a dividend program pursuant to which we expect to initiate an annual dividend of approximately $0.50 per share, payable quarterly, beginninginitiated in the first quarter of 2019. Our common stockholders are entitled to receive any such dividends or other distributions ratably. In February 2021, our Board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share that will be paid in March 2021. Each dividend under the program will beis subject to declaration by the Board and, thus, may be subject to numerous factors in existence at the time of any such declaration including, but not limited to, prevailing market conditions, our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, Delaware law and Delaware law.contractual limitations. For additional details, see Item 1A. Risk Factors and Note 1614 to the Financial Statements

Subject to limitations under applicable Delaware law, preferences that may apply to any outstanding shares of our preferred stock and contractual restrictions, holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends or other distributions ratably, when, as and if declared by the Board. The ability of the Board to declare dividends with respect to our common stock, however, will be subject to such limitations, preferences and restrictions and the availability of sufficient funds under the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) to pay such dividends.



Stock Performance Graph


The performance graph below compares Vistra Energy'sVistra's cumulative total return on common stock for the period from May 10, 2017 (the date we were listed on the NYSE) through December 31, 20182020 with the cumulative total returns of the S&P 500 Stock Index (S&P 500) and the S&P Utility Index (S&P Utilities). The graph below compares the return in each period assuming that $100 was invested at May 10, 2017 in Vistra Energy'sVistra's common stock, the S&P 500 and the S&P Utilities, and that all dividends were reinvested.
chart-af0274f9fb7a5cac2e7a04.jpgvistra-20201231_g1.jpg

49
Table of Contents
Share Repurchase Program


The following table provides information about our repurchase of equity securities that are registered by us pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended, during the quarter ended December 31, 2018.2020.
Total Number of Shares PurchasedAverage Price Paid per ShareTotal Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly Announced ProgramMaximum Dollar Amount of Shares that may yet be Purchased under the Program (in millions)
October 1 - October 31, 2020— $— — $332 
November 1 - November 30, 2020— $— — $332 
December 1 - December 31, 2020— $— — $332 
For the quarter ended December 31, 2020— $— — $332 
  Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly Announced Program Maximum Dollar Amount of Shares that may yet be Purchased under the Program (in millions)
October 1 - October 31, 2018 3,150,820
 $24.38
 3,150,820
 $—
November 1 - November 30, 2018 6,238,950
 $22.99
 6,238,950
 $1,107
December 1 - December 31, 2018 5,834,141
 $22.99
 5,834,141
 $972
For the quarter ended December 31, 2018 15,223,911
 $23.28
 15,223,911
 $972


In September 2020, we announced that the Board had authorized a new share repurchase program (Share Repurchase Program) under which up to $1.5 billion of our outstanding common stock may be repurchased. The Share Repurchase Program became effective January 1, 2021, at which time the Prior Share Repurchase Plan (described below) and all authorized amounts remaining thereunder terminated as of such date.

Under the Share Repurchase Program, any purchases of shares of the Company's stock may be repurchased from time to time in open market transactions at prevailing market prices, in privately negotiated transactions, pursuant to plans complying with the Exchange Act or by other means in accordance with federal securities laws. The actual timing, number and value of shares repurchased under the Share Repurchase Program or otherwise will be determined at our discretion and will depend on a number of factors, including our capital allocation priorities, the market price of our stock, general market and economic conditions, applicable legal requirements and compliance with the terms of our debt agreements.

In June 2018, we announced that the Board had authorized a share repurchase program under which up to $500 million of our outstanding common stock could be repurchased. This share repurchase program was effective as of June 13, 2018,purchased, and the program was completed on October 19, 2018.

Inin November 2018, we announced that the Board had authorized an incremental share repurchase program under which up to $1.25$1.250 billion of our outstanding stock maycould be purchased. We intend to implement the program opportunistically from time to time over approximately the next 12 months.

Shares of the Company's stock will be repurchased from time to timepurchased, resulting in open market transactions at prevailing market prices, in privately negotiated transactions, pursuant to plans complying with Rule 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or by other means in accordance with federal securities laws. The actual timing, number and value of shares repurchased under thean aggregate $1.750 billion share repurchase program will be determined at our discretion and will depend on a number of factors, including the market price of our stock, general market and economic conditions, applicable legal requirements and compliance with the terms of our debt agreements.(Prior Share Repurchase Program). The Prior Share Repurchase Program terminated effective January 1, 2021.



Item 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
VISTRA ENERGY CORP.
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts and Ratios
 Successor  Predecessor
 
Year Ended
December 31, 2018 (a)
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
 
Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
  
Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016
 
Year Ended
December 31,
     2015 2014
Operating revenues$9,144
$5,430
 $1,191
  $3,973
 $5,370
 $5,978
Impairment of goodwill$—
$—
 $—
  $—
 $(2,200) $(1,600)
Impairment of long-lived assets$—
$(25) $—
  $—
 $(2,541) $(4,670)
Operating income (loss)$491
$198
 $(161)  $568
 $(4,091) $(6,015)
Net income (loss) attributable to Vistra Energy/the Predecessor (b)$(54)$(254) $(163)  $22,851
 $(4,677) $(6,229)
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities$1,471
$1,386
 $81
  $(238) $237
 $444
Net loss per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — basic$(0.11)$(0.59) $(0.38)       
Net loss per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — diluted$(0.11)$(0.59) $(0.38)       
Dividend declared per share of common stock$—
$—
 $2.32
       

 Successor  Predecessor
 At December 31,  At December 31,
 2018 2017 2016  2015 2014
Balance Sheet Information:          
Total assets (c)(d)$26,024
 $14,600
 $15,167
  $15,658
 $21,343
Property, plant and equipment — net (c)(d)$14,612
 $4,820
 $4,443
  $9,349
 $12,288
Goodwill and intangible assets (e)$4,561
 $4,437
 $5,112
  $1,331
 $3,688
Long-term debt including current maturities (e)$11,065
 $4,423
 $4,623
  $19
 $73
Borrowings under debtor-in-possession credit facility$—
 $—
 $—
  $1,425
 $1,425
Pre-Petition notes, loans and other debt reported as liabilities subject to compromise (e)$—
 $—
 $—
  $31,668
 $31,856
Total stockholders' equity/membership interests$7,863
 $6,342
 $6,597
  $(22,884) $(18,209)
___________
(a)For the year ended December 31, 2018, reflects the results of operations acquired in the Merger.
(b)For the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016, net income includes net gains totaling $22.121 billion related to bankruptcy-related reorganization items including gains on extinguishing claims pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization (see Notes 5 and 7 to the Financial Statements).
(c)At December 31, 2018, includes assets acquired in the Merger.
(d)Reflects the impacts of impairment charges related to long-lived assets of $2.541 billion and $4.670 billion in the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively (see Note 4 to the Financial Statements).
(e)As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, includes both unsecured and under secured obligations incurred prior to the Petition Date, but excludes pre-petition obligations that were fully secured and other obligations that were allowed to be paid as ordered by the Bankruptcy Court. As of December 31, 2014, also excludes $702 million of deferred debt issuance and extension costs.



Item 7.MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

As described in Note 1 to the Financial Statements, Vistra Energy is considered a new reporting entity for accounting purposes as of the Effective Date, and its financial statements reflect the application of fresh start reporting. The financial statements of Vistra Energy (the Successor) for periods subsequent to the Effective Date are not comparable to the financial statements of TCEH (the Predecessor) for periods prior to the Effective Date, as those previous periods do not give effect to any adjustments to the carrying values of assets or amounts of liabilities that resulted from the Plan of Reorganization, and the related application of fresh start reporting, which includes accounting policies implemented by Vistra Energy that may differ from the Predecessor. See Note 614 to the Financial Statements for furthermore information concerning the Share Repurchase Program and the Prior Share Repurchase Program.


Item 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable.


50
Table of Contents
Item 7.MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The discussion below, as well as other portions of fresh start reporting.this annual report on Form 10-K, contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, Section 21E of the Exchange Act and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In addition, management may make forward-looking statements orally or in other writing, including, but not limited to, in press releases, quarterly earnings calls, executive presentations, in the annual report to stockholders and in other filings with the SEC. Readers can usually identify these forward-looking statements by the use of such words as “may,” “will,” “should,” “likely,” “plans,” “projects,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes” or similar words. These statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results could materially differ from those anticipated by such forward-looking statements. For more discussion about risk factors that could cause or contribute to such differences, see Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors" and other risks discussed herein. Forward-looking statements reflect the information only as of the date on which they are made. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect future events, developments, or other information. If Vistra does update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that additional updates will be made regarding that statement or any other forward-looking statements. This discussion is intended to clarify and focus on our results of operations, certain changes in our financial position, liquidity, capital structure and business developments for the periods covered by the consolidated financial statements included under Part II, Item 8 of this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. This discussion should be read in conjunction with those consolidated financial statements and the related notes and is qualified by reference to them.


The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for the Successor period for the years ended December 31, 20182020, 2019 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 20162018 should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements. Results are impacted by the effects of the Merger, fresh start reporting,Ambit Transaction, the Bankruptcy FilingCrius Transaction and the applicationMerger (see Note 2 to the Financial Statements). The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 and for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018 are included in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 852, Reorganizations.Condition and Results in our 2019 Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference except for the operational results from the former ERCOT, PJM, NY/NE and MISO segments that were replaced by the Texas, East, West and Sunset segments in an update of our reportable segments in the third quarter of 2020. Operational results for the Texas, East, West and Sunset segments for the year ended December 31, 2018 and for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018 are included in Results of Operations below to reflect this update of reportable segments.


All dollar amounts in the tables in the following discussion and analysis are stated in millions of U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated.


Business


Vistra Energy is a holding company operating an integrated retail and electric power generation business primarily in markets thoroughthroughout the U.S. Through our subsidiaries, we are engaged in competitive electricityenergy market activities including power generation, wholesale energy sales and purchases, commodity risk management and retail sales of electricity and related servicesnatural gas to end users. PriorEffective July 2, 2020, we changed our name from Vistra Energy Corp. to the Effective Date, TCEH was a holding company for our subsidiaries, which were principally engagedVistra Corp. to distinguish from companies that are involved in the same activities as they are today.exploring for, producing, refining, or transporting fossil fuels (many of which use "energy" in their names) and to better reflect our integrated business model, which combines a retail electricity and natural gas business focused on serving its customers with new and innovative products and services and an electric power generation business powering the communities we serve with safe, reliable power.


Operating Segments


Vistra Energy has six reportable segments: (i) Retail, (ii) ERCOT,Texas, (iii) PJM,East (iv) NY/NE (comprising NYISO and ISO-NE),West, (v) MISOSunset and (vi) Asset Closure. The PJM, NY/NE and MISOIn the third quarter of 2020, Vistra updated its reportable segments were established on the Merger Date to reflect markets served by businesses acquiredchanges in how the Merger. PriorCompany's CODM makes operating decisions, assesses performance and allocates resources. Management believes that the revised reportable segments provide enhanced transparency into the Company's long-term sustainable assets and its commitment to managing the Effective Date, there were no reportable business segments for TCEH.retirement of economically and environmentally challenged plants. See Note 22Notes 1 and 20 to the Financial Statements for further information concerning the updates to our reportable business segments.


51
Table of Contents
Significant Activities and Events and Items Influencing Future Performance


Entry into Purchase AgreementWinter Storm Uri

In February 2021, the U.S. experienced an unprecedented winter storm Uri, bringing extreme cold temperatures to Acquire Crius Energy Trust

the central U.S., including Texas. On February 7, 2019, Vistra Energy12, 2021, the Governor of Texas declared a state of disaster for all 254 counties in the State in response to the then-forecasted weather conditions. The declaration certified that severe winter weather posed an imminent threat due to prolonged freezing temperatures, heavy snow, and Crius Energy Trust (Crius) entered intofreezing rain statewide. On February 14, 2021, President Biden issued a definitive agreement,federal emergency declaration for all 254 Texas counties.

As part of its annual winter season preparations, our power plant teams executed a significant winter preparedness strategy, which included installing windbreaks and large radiant heaters to supplement existing freeze protection and insulation and performing preventative maintenance on freeze protection equipment such as the insulation and automatic circuitry designed to keep pipes at the power plants from freezing. In addition, in anticipation of winter storm Uri we took additional steps to prepare, including procuring additional demineralized water supply trailers to ensure sufficient water availability to run for extended periods and verifying that freeze protection circuits were operational.

This severe weather resulted in surging demand for power, gas supply shortages, operational challenges for generators, and a significant load shed event (i.e., involuntary outages to customers across the system for varying periods of time) that was subsequently amendedordered by ERCOT beginning on February 19, 2019 (as amended,15, 2021 and continuing through February 18, 2021. The biggest challenges to our plants throughout the Crius Purchase Agreement),storm were securing adequate natural gas supplies for our gas plants and the handling of frozen fuel at our coal plants. Despite these challenges, we estimate that our fleet generated approximately 25 to 30% of the power on the grid during the height of the outages, as compared to our approximately 18% market share.

The overall financial impact from winter storm Uri is still being calculated, but Vistra expects it will have a material adverse impact on its financial results driven by generation output being constrained due to challenges with receiving a steady supply of fuel for some plants as well as challenges with handling fuel already on site given the freezing conditions. As a result of these challenges, Vistra had to procure power in the ERCOT market at prices at or near the price cap to meet its supply obligations. While the financial impacts of winter storm Uri to Vistra are not yet finalized, Vistra management preliminarily estimates the one-time adverse impact on pre-tax net income will be in the range of approximately $900 million to $1.3 billion.

This estimated range is preliminary and based on currently available information and management estimates. The final amount of the estimated loss is subject to a variety of factors including, but not limited to, outstanding pricing, load, and settlement data from ERCOT (which is released at various intervals during a period of up to 180 days after the transaction day); the outcome of potential litigation arising from this event (including any litigation that we may pursue or be a party to); or any corrective action taken by the State of Texas, ERCOT, the RCT, or the PUCT to resettle pricing across any portion of the supply chain that is currently being considered or may be considered by any such parties.

There have already been several announced efforts by the state and federal governments and regulatory agencies to investigate and determine the causes of this event and its impact on consumers. We have received a civil investigative demand from the Attorney General of Texas as well as a request for information from ERCOT related to this event and may receive additional inquiries. We are cooperating with these entities and are working to respond to these requests. Those efforts may result in changes in regulations that impact our industry including but not limited to additional requirements for winterization of various facets of the electricity supply chain including generation, transmission, and fuel supply; improvements in coordination among the various participants in the electricity supply chain during any future event; potential revisions to the way in which the ERCOT market compensates and incentivizes the continued operation of assets that only run during times of scarcity; and potential changes to the types of plans permitted to be marketed to residential customers. We are continuing to monitor this situation as it develops but at this time cannot estimate any impacts of any legislative or regulatory changes or actions (including enforcement actions that may be brought against various market participants) that may occur as a result of the event on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

As of December 31, 2020, Vistra had total available liquidity of approximately $2.4 billion, which was primarily comprised of cash and availability under its revolving credit facility. During this storm event, Vistra was required to post a significant amount of collateral, including to ERCOT, clearinghouses for natural gas and power transactions and other trading counterparties. Despite these posting requirements, Vistra has consistently maintained, and it continues to maintain, sufficient liquidity to conduct its operations in the ordinary course. As of February 25, 2021, Vistra had more than $1.5 billion of cash and availability under its revolving credit facility to meet any of its liquidity needs.

52
Table of Contents
In response to the storm, Vistra committed to donate $5 million to assist Texas communities and individuals meet their most pressing needs, including support for food banks and food pantries, critical needs, bill payment assistance, and more. Vistra also assured residential customers across its retail brands that they will not see any near-term impact on their rates due to the winter weather event, though bills may increase due to high usage during the cold weather period in February.

Investments in Clean Energy and CO2 Reductions

In September 2020, we announced the planned development of up to 668 MW of solar photovoltaic power generation facilities and 260 MW of battery ESS in Texas. We will only invest in these growth projects if we are confident in the expected returns. See Note 3 to the Financial Statements for a summary of our solar and battery energy storage projects.

In September 2020 and December 2020, we announced our intention to retire (a) all of our remaining coal generation facilities in Illinois and Ohio, (b) one coal generation facility in Texas and (c) one natural gas facility in Illinois, no later than year-end 2027 due to economic challenges, including incremental expenditures that would be required to comply with the CCR rule and ELG rule (see Note 13 to the Financial Statements), and in furtherance of our efforts to significantly reduce our carbon footprint. See Note 4 to the Financial Statements for a summary of these planned generation retirements as well as our generation plant retirements in 2019.

COVID-19 Pandemic

With the global outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and the declaration of a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020, the U.S. government has deemed electricity generation, transmission and distribution as "critical infrastructure" providing essential services during this global emergency. As a provider of critical infrastructure, Vistra has an unsolicitedobligation to provide critically needed power to homes, businesses, hospitals and other customers. Vistra remains focused on protecting the health and well-being of its employees and the communities in which it operates while assuring the continuity of its business operations.

We have updated and implemented our company-wide pandemic plan to address specific aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic to guide our emergency response, business continuity, and the precautionary measures we are taking on behalf of employees and the public. We will continue to monitor developments affecting both our workforce and our customers, and we have taken, and will continue to take, health and safety measures that we determine are necessary in order to mitigate the impacts. To date, as a result of these business continuity measures, the Company has not experienced material disruptions in our operations due to COVID-19.

The fundamentals of the Company remain strong. Vistra believes it has sufficient available liquidity to continue business operations during this volatile period. As described under Available Liquidity, the Company has total available liquidity of $2.399 billion as of December 31, 2020, consisting of cash on hand and available capacity under our revolving credit facility (Revolving Credit Facility) of the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities. In addition, the maturities of our long-term debt are relatively modest until 2023. If the Company experienced a significant reduction in revenues or increases in costs or collateral requirements, the Company believes it would have additional alternatives to maintain access to liquidity, including drawing upon available liquidity or reductions to capital expenditures, planned voluntary debt repayments or operating costs. As a result of the Company's ongoing initiatives, the Company believes it is well-positioned to be able to respond to changes in customer demand, regulation or other factors impacting the Company's business related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

In response to the economic and employment impacts of the COVID-19 outbreak, various states have instituted moratoriums or other conditions on disconnections for retail electricity customers. For example, in March and April 2020, the PUCT issued multiple orders requiring REPs in the ERCOT market to suspend late fees for residential customers through May 15, 2020, and to offer deferred payment plans to customers upon request. The PUCT also enacted the COVID-19 Electricity Relief Program whereby REPs must forego disconnecting customers certified as experiencing COVID-19-related hardship, and if such customer would otherwise be subject to disconnection and meets other qualifications, such REP would request suppression of the delivery charges from the transmission and distribution utility and request a proxy energy charge reimbursement from the COVID-19 Electricity Relief Program of $0.04/kWh. The PUCT ceased accepting new enrollments under the COVID-19 Electricity Relief Program after August 31, 2020, and the disconnection protections and financial assistance expired after September 30, 2020.

See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for a summary of certain anticipated tax-related impacts of the CARES Act to the Company.

53
Table of Contents
The COVID-19 pandemic has presented potential new risks to the Company's business. Although there have been logistical and other challenges to date, there has been no material adverse impact on the Company's 2020 results of operations. The situation surrounding COVID-19 remains fluid and the potential for a material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial condition and liquidity increases the longer the virus impacts the level of economic activity in the U.S. and globally. As a result, COVID-19 may have a range of impacts on the Company's operations, the full extent and scope of which are currently unknown. See Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors — The outbreak of COVID-19, or the future outbreak of any other highly infectious or contagious diseases, could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Acquisitions and Merger

Ambit Transaction —On November 1, 2019 (Ambit Acquisition Date), Volt Asset Company, Inc., an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra, completed the acquisition proposal, pursuantof Ambit (Ambit Transaction). See Note 2 to whichthe Financial Statements for a summary of the Ambit Transaction and business combination accounting.

Crius Transaction —On July 15, 2019, Vienna Acquisition B.C. Ltd., an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra, Energy will acquirecompleted the acquisition of the equity interestinterests of two wholly owned subsidiaries of Crius that indirectly own the operating business of Crius (Crius Transaction). Crius is an energy retailer selling both electricity and natural gas productsSee Note 2 to residential and small business customers in 19 states and the District of Columbia.

The acquisition providesFinancial Statements for a high degree of overlap with Vistra Energy's generation fleet with approximately 11.6 TWh of annual load, improving Vistra Energy's match of its generation to load profile to approximately 45 percent, reducing risk. The acquisition also establishes a platform for future growth by leveraging Vistra Energy's existing retail marketing capabilities and Crius's experienced team. The acquisition enhances the integrated value proposition through collateral and transaction efficiencies, particularly via Crius's largely retail portfolio.

Vistra Energy intends to fund the purchase price of approximately $378 million using cash on hand and assumption of Crius's net debt of approximately $108 million. Completionsummary of the Crius Transaction is subject to various customary conditions, including, among others, (i) approval by at least two-thirds of the Crius unitholders and (ii) receipt of all requisite regulatory approvals, which include approvals of the FERC and the expiration and termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976. Pending the receipt of all necessary approvals and the fulfillment of all other customary closing conditions, the parties expect the transaction to close in the second quarter of 2019.business combination accounting.



Dynegy Merger Transaction

—On the Merger Date, Vistra Energy and Dynegy completed the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Dynegy merged with and into Vistra Energy, with Vistra Energy continuing as the surviving corporation.

At the closing of the Merger, each issued and outstanding share of Dynegy common stock, par value $0.01 per share, other than shares owned by Vistra Energy or its subsidiaries, held in treasury by Dynegy or held by a subsidiary of Dynegy, was automatically converted into 0.652 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Vistra Energy, except that cash was paid in lieu of fractional shares.

Based on the opening price of Vistra Energy common stock on the Merger Date, the purchase price was approximately $2.3 billion. The purchase price allocation is substantially complete, but is dependent upon final valuation determinations, which may materially change from our current estimates. The preliminary values for property plant and equipment, identifiable intangible assets and liabilities, goodwill, inventories, asset retirement obligations, contingent liabilities and deferred taxes represent our current best estimates of the fair value at the Merger Date. We currently expect the final purchase price allocation will be completed no later than the first quarter of 2019 and goodwill will be allocated to the related reporting units at that time.

See Note 2 to the Financial Statements for a summary of the Merger transaction and business combination accounting.


Acquisition, Development and Disposition of Generation Facilities

Battery Energy Storage Projects — We have completed the construction of our first battery energy storage system. In October 2018, we were awarded a $1 million grant from the TCEQ for our battery energy storage system at Upton 2 solar facility. The grant is part of the Texas Emissions Reduction Plan. The 10 MW lithium-ion energy storage system captures excess solar energy produced during the day and releases the energy in late afternoon and early evening, when demand is highest. The project became operational on December 31, 2018.

In June 2018, we announced that we would enter into a 20-year resource adequacy contract with Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) to develop a 300 MW battery energy storage project at our Moss Landing Power Plant site in California. PG&E filed its application with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in June 2018 and the CPUC approved the contract in November 2018. We anticipate the battery storage project will enter commercial operations by the fourth quarter of 2020.

Upton 2 Solar Development — In May 2017, we acquired the rights to develop, construct and operate a utility scale solar photovoltaic power generation facility in Upton County, Texas. As part of this project, we entered a turnkey engineering, procurement and construction agreement to construct the approximately 180 MW facility. The facility began test operations in March 2018 and commercial operations began in June 2018.

CCGT Plant Acquisition — In July 2017, La Frontera Holdings, LLC (La Frontera), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra Energy, entered into an asset purchase agreement with Odessa-Ector Power Partners, L.P., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Koch Ag & Energy Solutions, LLC (the Odessa Acquisition), to acquire a 1,054 MW CCGT natural gas-fueled generation plant (and other related assets and liabilities) located in Odessa, Texas (the Odessa Facility). On August 1, 2017, the Odessa Acquisition closed and La Frontera acquired the Odessa Facility. La Frontera paid an aggregate purchase price of approximately $355 million, plus a five-year earn-out provision, to acquire the Odessa Facility. The purchase price was funded by cash on hand. Subsequent to the acquisition, the earn-out provision has been accounted for as a derivative in our consolidated financial statements, and partial buybacks of the earn-out provision were settled in February and May 2018.

Retirement of Generation Plants — In August 2018, we filed a notice of suspension of operation with PJM and other mandatory regulatory notifications related to the retirement of our 51 MW Northeastern waste coal facility in McAddo, Pennsylvania. We decided to retire the facility due to its uneconomic operations and financial outlook. Following the receipt of regulatory approvals, the facility was retired in October 2018.

Two of our non-operated, jointly held power plants acquired in the Merger for which our proportional generation capacity was 883 MW, were retired in May 2018. These units were retired as previously scheduled.


In October 2017, Luminant announced plans to retire three power plants with a total installed nameplate generation capacity of approximately 4,167 MW and two lignite mines. These power plants include the Monticello, Sandow 4, Sandow 5 and Big Brown generation units. Luminant decided to retire these units because they were projected to be uneconomic based on then current market conditions and would have faced significant environmental costs associated with operating such units. In the case of the Sandow units, the decision also reflected the execution of a contract termination agreement pursuant to which the Company and Alcoa agreed to an early settlement of a long-standing power and mining agreement.

As part of the retirement process, Luminant filed notices with ERCOT, which triggered a reliability review regarding such proposed retirements. In October and November 2017, ERCOT determined the units were not needed for reliability. The Sandow and Monticello units were retired in January 2018, and the Big Brown units were retired in February 2018.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded charges of approximately $206 million related to the retirements, including employee related severance costs, noncash charges for writing off materials inventory and a contract intangible asset associated with the Big Brown plant and the acceleration of Luminant's mining reclamation obligations (see Note 23 to the Financial Statements). In addition, we will continue the ongoing reclamation work at the plants' mines.

Termination and Settlement of Alcoa Contract — In October 2017, subsidiaries of Vistra Energy (Vistra Parties) entered into a separation and settlement agreement (Settlement Agreement) with Alcoa Corporation and Alcoa USA Corp. (collectively, the Alcoa Parties). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Vistra Parties and the Alcoa Parties agreed to early termination of a series of agreements related to industrial operations near Rockdale, Texas, thereby ending their contractual relationship with respect to the power generation unit known as Sandow Unit 4 and the mine known as Three Oaks Mine. The terminated agreements were scheduled to terminate in 2038 absent the Settlement Agreement. Among other things, the Alcoa Parties made a cash payment to the Vistra Parties in the amount of approximately $238 million and transferred certain real property and related assets to the Vistra Parties, the Vistra Parties agreed to assume and be responsible for certain liabilities and asset retirement obligations related to Sandow Unit 4 (including certain related common facilities), the related mine and other property transferred from the Alcoa Parties to the Vistra Parties, and both parties released one another from any obligations and claims under the terminated agreements. The transactions under the Settlement Agreement were effective as of October 1, 2017. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements.

Dividend Program


In November 2018, we announced that the Board had adopted a dividend program pursuant to which we expect to initiate an annual dividend of approximately $0.50 per share, payable quarterly, beginninginitiated in the first quarter of 2019. EachSee Note 14 to the Financial Statements for more information about our dividend under the program will be subject to declaration by the Board and, thus, may be subject to numerous factors in existence at the time of any such declaration including, but not limited to, prevailing market conditions, our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity and Delaware law.program.

On February 26, 2019, Vistra Energy announced that the Board had declared a dividend pursuant to which Vistra Energy would pay, to each holder of record as of March 15, 2019, a dividend of $0.125 per share, to be paid March 29, 2019.


Share Repurchase Program


In June 2018,September 2020, we announced that the Board had authorized a new share repurchase program (Share Repurchase Program) under which up to $500 million$1.5 billion of our outstanding common stock may be repurchased. Repurchases under this program were completed on October 19, 2018. On a cumulative basis, 21,421,925The Share Repurchase Program was effective January 1, 2021, at which time the Prior Share Repurchase Plan terminated. From January 1, 2021 through February 23, 2021, 5,902,720 shares of our common stock werehad been repurchased under the Share Repurchase Program for $500$125 million (including related fees and expenses) at an average price per share of common stock of $23.36.

In November 2018, we announced that the Board had authorized an incremental share repurchase program under which up to $1.25 billion of our outstanding stock may be purchased. Through December 31, 2018, 12,073,091 shares of our common stock had been repurchased for $278 million (including related fees and expenses) at an average price per share of common stock of $22.99,$21.15, and at December 31, 2018, $972 millionFebruary 23, 2021, $1.375 billion was available for additional repurchasesrepurchase under the program. On a cumulative basis through February 25, 2019, 19,167,147 shares of our common stock had been repurchased for $451 million (including related fees and expenses) at an average price per share of common stock of $23.52, and at February 25, 2019, $799 million was available for additional repurchases under the program. We intend to implement the program opportunistically from time to time over the next 12 months.


Shares of the Company's common stock may be repurchased in open market transactions at prevailing market prices, in privately negotiated transactions or by other means in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or by other means in accordance with federal securities laws. The actual timing, number and value of shares repurchased under the share repurchase program will be determined at our discretion and will depend on a number of factors, including the market price of our stock, general market and economic conditions, applicable legal requirements and compliance with the terms of our debt agreements and the Tax Matters Agreement.

Debt Activity

We have a target to reduce leverage to approximately 2.5x net debt/EBITDA. The following transactions reflect our intention to simplify our capital structure and reduce interest expense. We will continue to pursue opportunities to refinance our long-term debt and reduce interest expense.

Issuance of Vistra Operations 5.625% Senior Notes Due 2027 — In February 2019, Vistra Operations issued and sold $1.3 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.625% senior notes due 2027 in an offering to eligible purchasers under Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The senior notes were sold pursuant to a purchase agreement by and among Vistra Operations, certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of Vistra Operations and J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC, as representative of the several initial purchasers. Net proceeds from the sale of the senior notes totaling approximately $1.287 billion, together with cash on hand, were used to pay the purchase price and accrued interest (together with fees and expenses) required in connection with (i) the 2019 cash tender offer described below, (ii) the redemption of approximately $35 million aggregate principal amount of our 7.375% senior notes due 2022 and (iii) the redemption of the remaining approximately $25 million aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 8.034% senior notes due 2024.

2019 Tender Offer and Consent Solicitation — In February 2019, Vistra Energy used the net proceeds from the issuance of the Vistra Operations 5.625% senior notes due 2027 to fund a cash tender offer (the 2019 Tender Offer) to purchase for cash approximately $1.193 billion aggregate principal amount of 7.375% senior notes due 2022 assumed in the Merger.

In connection with the 2019 Tender Offer, Vistra Energy also commenced solicitation of consents from holders of the 7.375% senior notes due 2022. Vistra Energy received the requisite consents from the holders of the 7.375% senior notes due 2022 and amended the indenture governing these senior notes to, among other things, eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain events of default.

BondShare Repurchase Program — In November 2018, the Board authorized a bond repurchase program under which up to $200 million principal amount of outstanding Vistra Energy senior notes could be repurchased. Through December 31, 2018, $119 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes had been repurchased.

Accounts Receivable Securitization Program — In August 2018, TXU Energy Receivables Company LLC (RecCo), a wholly owned subsidiary of TXU Energy, and Vistra Energy entered into a $350 million accounts receivable financing facility (Receivables Facility), currently scheduled to terminate in August 2019, with issuers of asset-backed commercial paper and commercial banks. Vistra Energy expects to have the opportunity to renew and/or extend the Receivables Facility upon its expiration subject to such terms and conditions as may be agreed upon by the parties thereto. The Receivables Facility provides Vistra Energy with the ability to borrow up to $350 million. See Note 13 to the Financial Statements for details of the accounts receivable securitization program.

Issuance of Vistra Operations 5.500% Senior Notes Due 2026 — In August 2018, Vistra Operations issued and sold $1 billion aggregate principal amount of the 5.500% senior notes due 2026 in an offering to eligible purchasers under Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The senior notes were sold pursuant to a purchase agreement by and among Vistra Operations, certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of Vistra Operations and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as representative of the several initial purchasers. Net proceeds from the sale of the senior notes totaling approximately $990 million, together with cash on hand and cash received from the funding of the accounts receivable securitization program described above, were used to pay the purchase price and accrued interest (together with fees and expenses) required in connection with the tender offers described below.


2018 Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations — In August 2018, Vistra Energy used the net proceeds from the issuance of the Vistra Operations 5.500% senior notes due 2026, proceeds from the accounts receivable securitization program and cash on hand to fund cash tender offers to purchase for cash $1.542 billion of senior notes assumed in the Merger. In connection with the tender offers, Vistra Energy also commenced solicitations of consents from holders of the 7.375% senior notes due 2022, the 7.625% senior notes due 2024, the 8.034% senior notes due 2024, the 8.000% senior notes due 2025 and the 8.125% senior notes due 2026 to amend certain provisions of the applicable indentures governing each series of senior notes and the registration rights agreement with respect to the 8.125% senior notes due 2026. Vistra Energy received the requisite consents from the holders of the 8.034% senior notes due 2024, the 8.000% senior notes due 2025 and the 8.125% senior notes due 2026 and amended the indentures governing each series of the applicable senior notes to, among other things, eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain events of default. In addition, Vistra Energy received the requisite consents from the holders of the 8.125% senior notes due 2026 and amended the registration rights agreement with respect to the 8.125% senior notes due 2026 to remove, among other things, the requirement that Vistra Energy commence an exchange offer to issue registered securities in exchange for the notes.

Amendment to Vistra Operations Credit Facilities — In June 2018, the Credit Facilities Agreement was amended. Among other things, the amendment included the following updated terms:

Aggregate commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility were increased from $860 million to $2.5 billion. The letter of credit sub-facility was also increased from $715 million to $2.3 billion. The maturity date of the Revolving Credit Facility was extended from August 4, 2021 to June 14, 2023. Pricing terms for the Revolving Credit Facility were reduced from LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 2.25% to LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 1.75%. Pricing terms for letters of credit issued under the Revolving Credit Facility were reduced from 2.25% to 1.75%.
Pricing terms for the Term Loan B-1 Facility were reduced from LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 2.50% to LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 2.00%.
Borrowings under the new Term Loan B-3 Facility of $2.040 billion principal amount were used to repay borrowings under the credit agreement that Vistra Energy assumed from Dynegy in connection with the Merger. Amounts borrowed under the Term Loan B-3 Facility bear interest based on applicable LIBOR rates plus a fixed spread of 2.00%, and the maturity date of the facility is December 31, 2025.
Borrowings under the Term Loan C Facility of $500 million were repaid using $500 million of cash from collateral accounts used to backstop letters of credit.

Program. See Note 14 to the Financial Statements for detailsmore information concerning the Share Repurchase Program and the Prior Share Repurchase Program.

Debt Activity

We have stated our objective to reduce our consolidated net leverage. We also intend to continue to simplify and optimize our capital structure, maintain adequate liquidity and pursue opportunities to refinance our long-term debt to extend maturities and/or reduce ongoing interest expense. In 2019 and 2020, we completed several transactions, including the redemption and repayment of the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities.

Redemptionall of Debt — In May 2018, $850 million aggregate principal amount ofParent's previously outstanding 6.75% Senior Notes due 2019 was redeemed at a redemption price of 101.688% ofsenior notes, that we believe, in the aggregate, principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to but not including the dateadvanced all of redemption (see Note 14).

Environmental Matters

these goals. See Note 1511 to the Financial Statements for a discussiondetails of greenhouse gas emissions,our long-term debt activity and Note 10 to the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, regional haze, state implementation plan and other recent EPA actions as well as related litigation.Financial Statements for details of our accounts receivable financing.



54
Table of Contents
Capacity Markets


PJM — Reliability Pricing Model (RPM) auction results, for the zones in which our assets are located, are as follows for each planning year:
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022
Base CP Base CP CP CP2020-20212021-2022
(price per MW-day)(average price per MW-day)
RTO zone (a)$149.98
 $164.77
 $80.00
 $100.00
 $88.32
 $140.00
RTO zone (a)$88.32 $140.00 
ComEd zone200.21
 215.00
 182.77
 202.77
 188.12
 195.55
ComEd zone188.12 195.55 
MAAC zone149.98
 164.77
 80.00
 100.00
 86.04
 140.00
MAAC zone86.04 140.00 
EMAAC zone210.63
 225.42
 99.77
 119.77
 187.87
 165.73
EMAAC zone187.87 165.73 
ATSI zone149.88
 164.77
 80.00
 100.00
 76.53
 171.33
ATSI zone76.53 171.33 
PPL zone75.00
 164.77
 80.00
 100.00
 86.04
 140.00
PPL zone86.04 140.00 
____________
(a)Planning Year 2020-2021 includes Duke Energy Ohio Kentucky (DEOK) zone which cleared at $130.00 per MW-day. RTO Zone excluding DEOK Zone was $76.53 per MW-day.

(a)Planning Year 2020-2021 includes Duke Energy Ohio Kentucky (DEOK) zone, which cleared at $130.00 per MW-day. RTO Zone excluding DEOK Zone was $76.53 per MW-day.

Our capacity sales, net of purchases, aggregated by planning year and capacity type through planning year 2020-2021,2022-2023, are as follows:
2020-20212021-20222022-2023
CP auction capacity sold, net (MW)9,065 9,309 125 
Bilateral capacity sold, net (MW)100 250 200 
Total segment capacity sold, net (MW)9,165 9,559 325 
Average price per MW-day$128.24 $157.30 $165.77 
 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022
Base auction capacity sold, net (MW)1,420
 893
 —
 —
CP auction capacity sold, net (MW)7,771
 8,144
 8,642
 9,053
Bilateral capacity sold, net (MW)285
—
200
 200
 200
Total segment capacity sold, net (MW)9,476
 9,237
 8,842
 9,253
Average price per MW-day$186.40
 $135.56
 $129.30
 $159.22


NYISO — The most recent seasonal auction results for NYISO's Rest-of-State zones, in which the capacity for our Independence plant clears, are as follows for each planning period:
Summer
2021		Winter
2021 - 2022
Price per kW-month$2.71 $0.10 
 
Summer
2018
 
Winter
2018 - 2019
Price per kW-month$1.75
 $0.35


Due to the short-term, seasonal nature of the NYISO capacity auctions, we monetize the majority of our capacity through bilateral trades. Our capacity sales, aggregated by season through summer 2021,winter 2022-2023, are as follows:
Winter
2020 - 2021		Summer
2021		Winter
2021 - 2022		Summer
2022		Winter
2022 - 2023
Auction capacity sold (MW)144 — — — — 
Bilateral capacity sold (MW)747 843 305 210 71 
Total capacity sold (MW)891 843 305 210 71 
Average price per kW-month$0.72 $2.43 $0.97 $1.13 $1.13 
 
Winter
2018 - 2019
 
Summer
2019
 
Winter
2019 - 2020
 
Summer
2020
 
Winter
2020 - 2021
 
Summer
2021
Auction capacity sold (MW)88
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
Bilateral capacity sold (MW)989
 540
 210
 75
 38
 20
Total capacity sold (MW)1,077
 540
 210
 75
 38
 20
Average price per kW-month$1.37
 $2.71
 $2.57
 $3.15
 $3.13
 $3.08



ISO-NE — The most recent FCAForward Capacity Auction results for ISO-NE Rest-of-Pool, in which most of our assets are located, are as follows for each planning year:
2020-20212021-20222022-20232023-2024
Price per kW-month$5.30 $4.63 $3.80 $2.00 
 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
Price per kW-month$9.55
 $7.03
 $5.30
 $4.63
 $3.80


Performance incentive rules went into effect for planning year 2018-2019, increasingincrease capacity payments for those resources that are providing excess energy or reserves during a shortage event, while penalizing those that produce less than the required level. We continue to market and pursue longer term multi-year capacity transactions that extend through planning year 2021-2022.2024-2025.
2020-20212021-20222022-20232023-20242024-2025
Auction capacity sold (MW)3,085 2,798 2,996 2,496 — 
Bilateral capacity sold (MW)191 170 95 20 20 
Total capacity sold (MW)3,276 2,968 3,091 2,516 20 
Average price per kW-month$5.11 $4.57 $3.92 $2.16 $4.93 

55
Table of Contents
 2018-2018 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
Auction capacity sold (MW)3,108
 3,161
 3,079
 2,592
 3,137
Bilateral capacity sold (MW)239
 75
 150
 170
 95
Total capacity sold (MW)3,347
 3,236
 3,229
 2,762
 3,232
Average price per kW-month$9.80
 $7.02
 $5.40
 $4.80
 $3.92

MISO — The capacity auction results for MISO Local Resource Zone 4, in which our assets are located, are as follows for each planning year:
2020-2021
Price per MW-day$5.00 
 2018-2019
Price per MW-day$10.00


MISO capacity sales through planning year 2020-20212023-2024 are as follows:
2020-20212021-20222022-20232023-2024
Bilateral capacity sold in MISO (MW)2,672 2,098 573 251 
CP auction capacity sold in PJM (MW)— 15 — — 
Total MISO segment capacity sold (MW)2,672 2,113 573 251 
Average price per kW-month$3.04 $3.12 $4.05 $3.69 
 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022
Bilateral capacity sold in MISO (MW)2,533
 2,047
 1,663
 667
Base auction capacity sold in PJM (MW)227
 260
 —
 —
CP auction capacity sold in PJM (MW)835
 356
 444
 798
Total MISO segment capacity sold (MW)3,595
 2,663
 2,107
 1,465
Average price per kW-month$3.70
 $3.62
 $3.81
 $4.22


CAISO — Our capacity sales, aggregated by calendar year for 20192021 through 20212022 for Moss Landing, are as follows:
20212022
Bilateral capacity sold (Avg MW)1,020 831 


56
 2019 2020 2021
Bilateral capacity sold (Avg MW)890
 —
 —
Table of Contents


Key Operational Risks and Challenges


Following is a discussion of certain key operational risks and challenges facing management and the initiatives currently underway to manage such challenges. These matters involve risks that could have a material effect on our business, results of operations, liquidity, or financial condition.condition, cash flows, reputation, prospects and the market price for our securities (including our common stock). See also Item 1A. Risk Factors in this annual report on Form 10-K for additional discussion on risks that could have a material effect on our results of operations, liquidity, financial condition, cash flows, reputation, prospects and the market price for our securities (including our common stock).


Natural Gas Price and Market Heat Rate Exposure


The price of power is typically set by natural gas-fueled generation facilities, with wholesale prices generally tracking increases or decreases in the price of natural gas.gas, with exceptions such as those periods during which ERCOT power prices rise significantly as a result of the scarcity of available generation resources relative to power demand. In recent years, natural gas supply has outpaced demand primarily as a result of development and expansion of hydraulic fracturing in natural gas extraction; thethis supply/demand imbalanceenvironment has resulted in historically low natural gas prices, and such prices have historically been volatile. The table below shows the general decline in forward natural gas prices over the last several years (amounts are per MMBtu.)
chart-169fc61cfa4299ecdd8a04.jpg
________________
(a)Settled prices represent the average of NYMEX Henry Hub monthly settled prices of financial contracts for the year ending on the date presented. Forward prices represent the three-year average of NYMEX Henry Hub monthly forward prices at the date presented. Three-year forward prices are presented as such period is generally deemed to be a liquid period.



In contrast to our natural gas-fueled generation facilities, changes in natural gas prices have no significant effect on the cost of generating power at our nuclear-, lignite- and coal-fueled facilities, which represent a substantial amount of our generation capacity.facilities. Consequently, all other factors being equal, these nuclear-, lignite- and coal-fueled generation assets increase or decrease in value as wholesale electricity prices change either as a result of changes in natural gas prices andor market heat rates, rise or fall, respectively, because of the effect on our operating margins from changes in wholesale electricity prices.margins. A persistent decline in the price of natural gas, and the corresponding declineif not offset by an increase in the price of power,market heat rates, would likely have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, predominantly related to the production of power generation volumes in excess of the volumes utilized to service our retail customer load requirements.requirements and wholesale hedges.


The wholesale market price of electricity divided by the market price of natural gas represents the market heat rate. Market heat rate can be affected by a number of factors, including generation availability, mix of assets and the efficiency of the marginal supplier (generally natural gas-fueled generation facilities) in generating electricity. Our market heat rate exposure is impacted by changes in the availability of generation resources, such as additions and retirements of generation facilities, and mix of generation assets. For example, increasing renewable (wind and solar) generation capacity generally depresses market heat rates. Our heat rate exposurerates, particularly during periods when total demand is relatively low. However, increasing penetration of renewable generation capacity may also impacted bycontribute to greater volatility of wholesale market prices independent of changes in the potential economic backdownprice of our generation assets.natural gas, given their intermittent nature. Decreases in market heat rates decrease the value of our generation assets because lower market heat rates generally result in lower wholesale electricity prices, and vice versa. However, even though market heat rates have generally increased over the past several years, wholesale electricity prices have declined due to the greater effect of falling natural gas prices.


As a result of our exposure to the variability of natural gas prices and market heat rates, retail sales and hedging activities are critical to our operating results and maintaining consistent cash flow levels.


Our integrated power generation and retail electricity business provides us opportunities to hedge our generation position utilizing retail electricity markets as a sales channel. In addition, our approach to managing electricity price risk focuses on the following:


•employing disciplined, liquidity-efficient hedging and risk management strategies through physical and financial energy-related contracts intended to partially hedge gross margins;
•continuing focus on cost management to better withstand gross margin volatility;
•following a retail pricing strategy that appropriately reflects the value of our product offering to customers, the magnitude and costs of commodity price, liquidity risk and retail demand variability,variability; and
•improving retail customer service to attract and retain high-value customers.


We have engaged in natural gas hedging activities to mitigate the risk of lower wholesale electricity prices that have corresponded to declines in natural gas prices. While current and forward natural gas prices are currently depressed, we continue to seek opportunities to manage our wholesale power price exposure through hedging activities, including forward wholesale and retail electricity sales.


Taking together forward wholesale, retail electricity sales
57
Table of Contents
Estimated hedging levels for generation volumes in our Texas, East, West and other retail customer considerations and all other hedging positions in ERCOT,Sunset segments at December 31, 2018, we had effectively hedged an estimated 99% and 91% of the natural gas price exposure related to our overall business for 2019 and 2020 respectively. These percentages assume conversion of generation positions based on market heat rates and an estimate of natural gas generally being on the margin 70% to 90% of the time in the ERCOT market. Additionally, taking into consideration our overall heat rate exposure and related hedging positions in ERCOT at December 31, 2018, we had effectively hedged 88% and 42% of the heat rate exposure to our overall business for 2019 and 2020, respectively. We make the distinction between natural gas price exposure and heat rate exposure for the ERCOT market because of the high percentage of time natural gas is on the margin and the availability of traded products in ERCOT to hedge heat rate directly. Generation volumes hedged in PJM, NYISO, ISO-NE, MISO and CAISO at December 31, 2018 were as follows:

 2019 2020
PJM87% 57%
NYISO/ISO-NE81% 29%
MISO/CAISO65% 35%
20212022
Nuclear/Renewable/Coal Generation:
Texas91 %46 %
Sunset98 %57 %
Gas Generation:
Texas76 %16 %
East92 %23 %
West99 %9 %



The following sensitivity table provides approximate estimates of the potential impact of movements in natural gaspower prices and marketspark spreads (the difference between the power revenue and fuel expense of natural gas-fired generation as calculated using an assumed heat ratesrate of 7.2 MMBtu/MWh) on realized pretax earnings (in millions) taking into account the hedge positions noted in the paragraph above for the periods presented. The residual gas position is calculated based on two steps: first, calculating the difference between actual heat rates of our natural gas generation units and the assumed 7.2 heat rate used to calculate the sensitivity to spark spreads; and second, calculating the residual natural gas exposure that is not already included in the gas generation spark spread sensitivity shown in the table below. The estimates related to price sensitivity are based on our expected generation, and retail positions, related hedges and forward prices as of December 31, 2018.2020.

20212022
Texas:
Nuclear/Renewable/Coal Generation: $2.50/MWh increase in power price$12 $63 
Nuclear/Renewable/Coal Generation: $2.50/MWh decrease in power price$(9)$(59)
Gas Generation: $1.00/MWh increase in spark spread$12 $33 
Gas Generation: $1.00/MWh decrease in spark spread$(9)$(30)
Residual Natural Gas Position: $0.25/MMBtu increase in natural gas price$(13)$(15)
Residual Natural Gas Position: $0.25/MMBtu decrease in natural gas price$1 $3 
East:
Gas Generation: $1.00/MWh increase in spark spread$5 $38 
Gas Generation: $1.00/MWh decrease in spark spread$(3)$(35)
Residual Natural Gas Position: $0.25/MMBtu increase in natural gas price$(5)$(4)
Residual Natural Gas Position: $0.25/MMBtu decrease in natural gas price$5 $4 
West:
Gas Generation: $1.00/MWh increase in spark spread$— $4 
Gas Generation: $1.00/MWh decrease in spark spread$— $(4)
Residual Natural Gas Position: $0.25/MMBtu increase in natural gas price$1 $1 
Residual Natural Gas Position: $0.25/MMBtu decrease in natural gas price$(1)$(1)
Sunset:
Coal Generation: $2.50/MWh increase in power price$5 $40 
Coal Generation: $2.50/MWh decrease in power price$(1)$(34)

58
Balance 2019 (a)2020
ERCOT:
$0.50/MMBtu increase in natural gas price (b)$ ~50$ ~115
$0.50/MMBtu decrease in natural gas price (b)$ ~(35)$ ~(100)
1.0/MMBtu/MWh increase in market heat rate (c)$ ~60$ ~165
1.0/MMBtu/MWh decrease in market heat rate (c)$ ~(45)$ ~(150)
PJM:
$0.50/MMBtu increase in natural gas price (d)$ ~32$ ~93
$0.50/MMBtu decrease in natural gas price (d)$ ~(22)$ ~(72)
1.0/MMBtu/MWh increase in market heat rate (e)$ ~33$ ~71
1.0/MMBtu/MWh decrease in market heat rate (e)$ ~(26)$ ~(68)
NYISO/ISO-NE:
$0.50/MMBtu increase in natural gas price (d)$ ~11$ ~66
$0.50/MMBtu decrease in natural gas price (d)$ ~(5)$ ~(54)
1.0/MMBtu/MWh increase in market heat rate (f)$ ~23$ ~62
1.0/MMBtu/MWh decrease in market heat rate (f)$ ~(11)$ ~(50)
MISO/CAISO:
$0.50/MMBtu increase in natural gas price (d)$ ~85$ ~145
$0.50/MMBtu decrease in natural gas price (d)$ ~(68)$ ~(116)
1.0/MMBtu/MWh increase in market heat rate (g)$ ~47$ ~73
1.0/MMBtu/MWh decrease in market heat rate (g)$ ~(42)$ ~(65)
Table of Contents
___________
(a)Balance of 2019 is from February 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019.
(b)Based on Houston Ship Channel natural gas prices at December 31, 2018.
(c)Based on ERCOT North Hub around-the-clock heat rates at December 31, 2018.
(d)Based on NYMEX natural gas prices at December 31, 2018.
(e)Based on AEP Dayton Hub, Northern Illinois Hub and PJM West Hub around-the-clock heat rates at December 31, 2018.
(f)Based on Massachusetts Hub and NYISO Zone C around-the-clock heat rates at December 31, 2018.
(g)Based on Indiana Hub and NP15 around-the-clock heat rates at December 31, 2018.

Competitive Retail Markets and Customer Retention


Competitive retail activity in ERCOT has resulted in retail customer churn as customers switch retail electricity providers for various reasons. Based on numbers of meters, our total retail customer counts increased 2% in 2018, increased slightly in 2017 and declined approximately 1% in 2016.2020 and approximately 2% in both 2019 and 2018. Based upon December 31, 20182020 results discussed below in Results of Operations, a 1% decline in retail customers in ERCOT would result in a decline in annual revenues of approximately $55$57 million. In responding to the competitive landscape in the ERCOT market, we have attempted to reduce overall customer losses by focusing on the following key initiatives:


•Maintaining competitive pricing initiatives on residential service plans;
•Actively competing for new customers in areas open to competition within ERCOT, while continuing to strive to enhance the experience of our existing customers; we are focused on continuing to implement initiatives that deliver world-class customer service and improve the overall customer experience;
•
Establishing and leveraging our TXU EnergyTM brand in the sale of electricity to residential and commercial customers, as the most innovative retailer in the ERCOT market by continuing to develop tailored product offerings to meet customer needs, and

•Establishing and leveraging our TXU EnergyTM brand in the sale of electricity to residential and commercial customers, as the most innovative retailer in the ERCOT market by continuing to develop tailored product offerings to meet customer needs; and
•Focusing market initiatives largely on programs targeted at retaining the existing highest-value customers and to recapturing customers who have switched REPs, including maintaining and continuously refining a disciplined contracting and pricing approach and economic segmentation of the business market to enhance targeted sales and marketing efforts and to more effectively deploy our direct-sales force; tactical programs we have initiated include improved customer service, aided by an enhanced customer management system, new product price/service offerings and a multichannel approach for the small business market.


Exposures Related to Nuclear Asset Outages


Our nuclear assets are comprised of two generation units at the Comanche Peak facility, each with an installed nameplate generation capacity of 1,150 MW. As of December 31, 2018,2020, these units represented approximately 6% of our total generation capacity. The nuclear generation units represent our lowest marginal cost source of electricity. Assuming both nuclear generation units experienced an outage at the same time, the unfavorable impact to pretax earnings is estimated (based upon forward electricity market prices for 20192021 at December 31, 2018)2020) to be approximately $1 million per day before consideration of any costs to repair the cause of such outages or receipt of any insurance proceeds. Also see discussion of nuclear facilities insurance in Note 1513 to the Financial Statements.Statements to understand the importance and limits of our insurance protection.


The inherent complexities and related regulations associated with operating nuclear generation facilities result in environmental, regulatory and financial risks. The operation of nuclear generation facilities is subject to continuing review and regulation by the NRC, covering, among other things, operations, maintenance, emergency planning, security, and environmental and safety protection. The NRC may implement changes in regulations that result in increased capital or operating costs and may require extended outages, modify, suspend or revoke operating licenses and impose fines for failure to comply with its existing regulations and the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act. In addition, an unplanned outage at another nuclear generation facility could result in the NRC taking action to shut down our Comanche Peak units as a precautionary measure.


We participate in industry groups and with regulators to keep current on the latest developments in nuclear safety, operation and maintenance and on emerging threats and mitigating techniques. These groups include, but are not limited to, the NRC, the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) and the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI). We also apply the knowledge gained through our continuing investment in technology, processes and services to improve our operations and to detect, mitigate and protect our nuclear generation assets. Management continues to focus on the safe, reliable and efficient operations at the facility.


Cyber/Data Security and Infrastructure Protection Risk


A breach of cyber/data security measures that impairs our information technology infrastructure could disrupt normal business operations and affect our ability to control our generation assets, access retail customer information and limit communication with third parties. Any loss of confidential or proprietary data through a breach could materially affect our reputation, including our TXU EnergyTM, Ambit Energy, Value Based Brands, Dynegy Energy Services, and Homefield Energy, TriEagle Energy, Public Power and U.S. Gas & Electric brands, expose the company to legal claims and regulatory scrutiny or impair our ability to execute on business strategies.


59
Table of Contents
We participate in industry groups and with regulators to remain current on emerging threats and mitigating techniques. These groups include, but are not limited to, the U.S. Cyber Emergency Response Team, the National Electric Sector Cyber Security Organization, the NRC and NERC.


While the companyCompany has not experienced a cyber/data event causing any material operational, reputational or financial impact, we recognize the growing threat within the general market place and our industry, and are proactively making strategic investments in our perimeter and internal defenses, cyber/data security operations center and regulatory compliance activities. We also apply the knowledge gained through industry and government organizations to continuously improve our technology, processes and services to detect, mitigate and protect our cyber and data assets.


Seasonality


The demand for and market prices of electricity and natural gas are affected by weather. As a result, our operating results are impacted by extreme or sustained weather conditions and may fluctuate on a seasonal basis. Typically, demand for and the price of electricity is higher in the summer and winter seasons, when the temperatures are more extreme, and the demand for and price of natural gas is also generally higher in the winter. More severe weather conditions such as heat waves or extreme winter weather have made, and may make such fluctuations more pronounced. However, not all regions of the U.S. typically experience extreme weather conditions at the same time, so Vistra Energy is typically not exposed to the effects of extreme weather in all parts of its business at once. The pattern of this fluctuation may change depending on, among other things, the retail load served and the terms of contracts to purchase or sell electricity.



Application of Critical Accounting Policies


Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 to the Financial Statements. We follow accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. Application of these accounting policies in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the reporting of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates and revenues and expenses during the periods covered. The following is a summary of certain critical accounting policies that are impacted by judgments and uncertainties and under which different amounts might be reported using different assumptions or estimation methodologies.


Purchase Accounting


On November 1, 2019, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra completed the Merger Date, Dynegy merged withAmbit Transaction. On July 15, 2019, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra completed the Crius Transaction. Each of the Ambit Transaction and into Vistra Energy, with Vistra Energy continuing as the surviving corporation. The Merger is beingCrius Transaction, respectively, was accounted for in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations (ASC 805), with identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed recorded at their estimated fair values on the Ambit Acquisition Date and the Crius Acquisition Date, respectively. See Note 2 to the Financial Statements for the purchase price allocations for both the Ambit Transaction and Crius Transaction as well as the related adjustments through the respective measurement periods.

Determining fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires significant estimates and judgments. We determine fair value based on the estimated price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

The acquired assets that involved the most subjectivity in determining fair value consisted of the customer relationship intangible assets. The assignment of fair value to the identifiable intangible assets requires judgment. We apply an income-based valuation methodology in measuring the customer relationships acquired, which include certain assumptions such as forecasted future cash flows, customer attrition rates, and discount rates. Customer relationship intangibles assets are generally amortized using an accelerated method based on historical customer attrition rates and reflecting the expected pattern in which the economic benefits are realized over their estimated useful lives.

On the Merger Date, Dynegy merged with and into Vistra, with Vistra continuing as the surviving corporation. The Merger was accounted for in accordance with ASC 805, with identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed recorded at their estimated fair values on the Merger Date. Vistra Energy is the acquirer for both federal tax and accounting purposes. The combined results of operations are reported in our consolidated financial statements beginning as of the Merger Date. See Note 2 to the Financial Statements.


During the measurement period, which is up to one year from the Merger date, we record adjustments to the initial estimates in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined based on facts and circumstances that existed as
60
Table of the acquisition date. We expect to finalize our purchase price allocation in the quarter ended March 31, 2019. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments will be recorded to earnings. Transaction costs have been expensed as incurred.Contents

The acquired assets and liabilities that involved the most subjectivity in determining fair value consisted of property, plant and equipment and executory contracts, primarily long-term service agreements for maintenance of power plants, and a unit-specific power sales agreement.agreement and rail transportation contracts. The fair value of each power plant was estimated using a combination of an income approach and a market approach. The income approach is the present value of future cash flows over the life of each power plant that are based on management’s estimates of revenues and operating expenses, and appropriate discount rates. The estimate of long term prices of electricity and natural gas at each plant location that was used in developing forecasted revenues for the income approach was especially subjective, because as of the Merger Date, limited market information about future prices beyond the year 2022 was available. The market valuation method uses prices paid for a reasonably similar asset by other purchasers in the relevant market, with adjustments relating to any differences between the assets and locations. The determination of deferred tax assets was complex as it required assessing income tax rules and regulations and proposed regulations that impose limitations on the future use of acquired net operating losses and other limitations on deductions.

Accounting in Reorganization and Fresh-Start Reporting

The consolidated financial statements of our Predecessor reflect the application of ASC 852. During the Chapter 11 Cases, the Debtors, including our Predecessor and its subsidiaries, operated their businesses as debtors-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. ASC 852 applies to entities that have filed a petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The guidance requires that transactions and events directly associated with the reorganization be distinguished from the ongoing operations of the business. In addition, the guidance provides for changes in the accounting and presentation of liabilities. Expenses and income directly associated with the Chapter 11 Cases are reported separately in the statements of consolidated income (loss) as reorganization items. Reorganization items also include adjustments to reflect the carrying value of liabilities subject to compromise (LSTC) at their estimated allowed claim amounts, as such adjustments are determined. See Note 5 to the Financial Statements.

As of the Effective Date, Vistra Energy applied fresh-start reporting under the applicable provisions of ASC 852. Fresh-start reporting includes (1) distinguishing the consolidated financial statements of the entity that was previously in restructuring from the consolidated financial statements of the entity that emerges from restructuring, (2) assigning the reorganized value of the successor entity by measuring all assets and liabilities of the successor entity at fair value, and (3) selecting accounting policies for the successor entity. The effects from emerging from bankruptcy, including the extinguishment of liabilities, as well as the fresh start reporting adjustments are reported in the Predecessor's statement of consolidated income (loss). The consolidated financial statements of Vistra Energy for periods subsequent to the Effective Date are not comparable to the financial statements of our Predecessor for periods prior to the Effective Date, as those previous periods do not give effect to any adjustments to the carrying values of assets or amounts of liabilities, nor any differences in accounting policies that were a consequence of the Plan of Reorganization or the related application of fresh-start reporting. See Note 6 to the Financial Statements.



Derivative Instruments and Mark-to-Market Accounting


We enter into contracts for the purchase and sale of energy-related commodities, and also enter into other derivative instruments such as options, swaps, futures and forwards primarily to manage commodity price and interest rate risks. Under accounting standards related to derivative instruments and hedging activities, these instruments are subject to mark-to-market accounting, and the determination of market values for these instruments is based on numerous assumptions and estimation techniques.


Mark-to-market accounting recognizes changes in the fair value of derivative instruments in the financial statements as market prices change. Such changes in fair value are accounted for as unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses in net income with an offset to derivative assets and liabilities. The availability of quoted market prices in energy markets is dependent on the type of commodity (e.g.(e.g., natural gas, electricity, etc.), time period specified and delivery point. Where quoted market prices are not available, the fair value is based on unobservable inputs, which require significant judgment. Derivative instruments valued based on unobservable inputs primarily include (i) forward sales and purchases of electricity, natural gas and coal, (ii) electricity, natural gas and coal options, and (iii) financial transmission rights. In computing fair value for derivatives, each forward pricing curve is separated into liquid and illiquid periods. The liquid period varies by delivery point and commodity. Generally, the liquid period is supported by exchange markets, broker quotes and frequent trading activity. For illiquid periods, fair value is estimated based on forward price curves developed using proprietary modeling techniques that take into account available market information and other inputs that might not be readily observable in the market. We estimate fair value as described in Note 1715 to the Financial Statements.


Accounting standards related to derivative instruments and hedging activities allow for normal purchase or sale elections and hedge accounting designations, which generally eliminate or defer the requirement for mark-to-market recognition in net income and thus reduce the volatility of net income that can result from fluctuations in fair values. Normal purchases and sales are contracts that provide for physical delivery of quantities expected to be used or sold over a reasonable period in the normal course of business and are not subject to mark-to-market accounting if the normal purchase or sale election is made. Accounting standards also permit an entity to designate certain qualifying derivative contracts in a hedge accounting relationship, whereby changes in fair value are not recognized immediately in earnings. Vistra Energy does not have derivative instruments with hedge accounting designations.


We report derivative assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets without taking into consideration netting arrangements that we have with counterparties. Margin deposits that contractually offset these assets and liabilities are reported separately in the consolidated balance sheets, with the exception of certain margin amounts related to changes in fair value on CME transactions that beginning in January 2017, are legally characterized as settlement of derivative contracts rather than collateral.


See Note 1816 to the Financial Statements for further discussion regarding derivative instruments.


Accounting for Income Taxes


Subsequent to the Effective Date, Vistra Energy files a United StatesU.S. federal income tax return that includes the results of its consolidated subsidiaries. Vistra Energy is the corporate parent of the Vistra Energy consolidated group. Pursuant to applicable United StatesU.S. Department of the Treasury regulations and published guidance of the IRS, corporations that are members of a consolidated group have joint and several liability for the taxes of such group.


61
Table of Contents
Our income tax expense and related consolidated balance sheet amounts involve significant management estimates and judgments. Amounts of deferred income tax assets and liabilities, as well as current and noncurrent accruals, involve estimates and judgments of the timing and probability of recognition of income and deductions by taxing authorities. In assessing the likelihood of realization of deferred tax assets, management considers estimates of the amount and character of future taxable income. Actual income taxes could vary from estimated amounts due to the future impacts of various items, including changes in income tax laws, our forecasted financial condition and results of operations in future periods, as well as final review of filed tax returns by taxing authorities. Income tax returns are regularly subject to examination by applicable tax authorities. In management's opinion, the liability recorded pursuant to income tax accounting guidance related to uncertain tax positions reflects future taxes that may be owed as a result of any examination.

Our deferred tax assets were significantly impacted by the TCJA, which reduced the overall federal corporate rate from 35% to 21%. This rate change decreased our overall deferred tax asset balance by approximately $451 million during the year ended December 31, 2017.


See Notes 1 and 97 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of income tax matters.



Accounting for Tax Receivable Agreement


On the Effective Date, weVistra entered into a tax receivable agreement (the TRA) with a transfer agent. Pursuant to the TRA, we issued beneficial interests in the rights to receive payments under the TRA (the TRA Rights) to the first lien creditors of our Predecessor to be held in escrowRights for the benefit of the first lienfirst-lien creditors of our PredecessorTCEH entitled to receive such TRA Rights under the Plan of Reorganization. Vistra Energy reflected the obligation associated with TRA Rights at fair value in the amount of $574 million as of the Emergence Date related to these future payment obligations. As of December 31, 2018,2020, the TRA obligation has been adjusted to $420$450 million. During the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, we recorded an increasea decrease to the carrying value of the TRA obligation totaling $14 million. The largest driver in$69 million as a result of adjustments to forecasted taxable income, including the increaseimpacts of the CARES Act, changes to Section 163(j) percentage limitation amount, the TRA obligation carrying value primarily resulted from in the timing of estimated payments and new multistate tax impacts resulting from the Merger, which increasedissuance of the totalfinal Section 163(j) regulations and the anticipated tax benefits from renewable development projects. At December 31, 2020, expected undiscounted federal and state payments under the TRA from $1.2 billionis estimated to be approximately $1.4 billion. The TRA obligation value is the discounted amount of estimatedprojected payments to be made each year under the TRA, based on certain assumptions, including but not limited to:


•the amount of tax basis related to (i) the Lamar and Forney acquisition and (ii) step-up resulting from the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale (which is estimated to be approximately $5.5 billion) and the allocation of such tax basis step-up among the assets subject thereto;
•the depreciable lives of the assets subject to such tax basis step-up, which generally is expected to be 15 years for most of such assets;
•a blended federal/state corporate income tax rate in all future years of 23%23.3%;
•future taxable income by year for future years;
•the Company generally expects to generate sufficient taxable income to be able to utilize the deductions arising out of (i) the tax basis step up attributable to the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale, (ii) the entire tax basis of the assets acquired as a result of the Lamar and Forney Acquisition, and (iii) tax benefits related to imputed interest deemed to be paid by us as a result of payments under the TRA in the tax year in which such deductions arise;
•a discount rate of 15%, which represented our view at the Emergence Date of the rate that a market participant would use based on the risk associated with the uncertainty in the amount and timing of the cash flows, at the time of Emergence,Emergence; and
•additional states that Vistra Energy now operates in, the relevant tax rates of those states and how income will be apportioned to those states.


We recognize accretion expense over the life of the TRA Rights liability as the present value of the liability is accreted up over the life of the liability. This noncash accretion expense is reported in the consolidated statements of consolidated income (loss)operations as Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement. Further, there may be significant changes, which may be material, to the estimate of the related liability due to various reasons including changes in corporatefederal and state tax law,laws and regulations, changes in estimates of the amount or timing of future consolidated taxable income, utilization of Vistra Energy and its subsidiariesacquired net operating losses, reversals of temporary book/tax differences and other items. Changes in those estimates are recognized as adjustments to the related TRA Rights liability, with offsetting impacts recorded in the consolidated statements of consolidated income (loss)operations as Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement. See Note 108 to the Financial Statements.


62
Table of Contents
Asset Retirement Obligations (ARO)


As part of fresh start reporting, new fair values were established for all AROs for the Successor. As part of business combination accounting, new fair values were established for all AROs assumed in the Merger. A liability is initially recorded at fair value for an asset retirement obligationARO associated with the legal obligation associated with law, regulatory, contractual or constructive retirement requirements of tangible long-lived assetsassets. Changes to the estimate of the ARO requires us to make significant estimates and assumptions. Specifically, the estimates and assumptions required for the mining land reclamation related to lignite mining, such as the costs to fill in mining pits and interpreting the mining permit closure requirements, are complex and require a significant amount of judgment. To develop the estimate associated with the costs to fill in mining pits, we utilize a complex proprietary model to estimate the volume of the pit. A significant portion of the estimate is associated with the Asset Closure Segment, thus related to closed facilities with changes in the periodestimate recorded to our consolidated statements of operations.

During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we transferred $15 million and $135 million, respectively, in which it is incurred ifARO obligations to third parties for remediation. Any remaining unpaid third-party obligation was reclassified to other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits in our consolidated balance sheets.

At December 31, 2020, the carrying value of our ARO related to our nuclear generation plant decommissioning totaled $1.585 billion and includes an assumption that Vistra receives a fair value is reasonably estimable. Generally,license extension of 20 years from the NRC to continue to operate the Comanche Peak facility. The costs to ultimately decommission that facility are recoverable through the regulatory rate making process as part of Oncor's delivery fees and therefore changes in estimates related toof the ARO obligations are recorded as increases or decreases to the liability and related asset as information becomes available. Changes in estimates related to assets that have been retired or for which capitalized costs aredo not recoverable are reflected in the statement of consolidated income (loss).impact Vistra's earnings.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded additional ARO obligations totaling $112 million primarily reflecting the acceleration of ARO obligations due to the retirements of our Monticello, Sandow and Big Brown plants. In addition, we recorded additional ARO obligations totaling $62 million as part of acquiring certain real property through the Alcoa contract settlement.


See Note 2321 to the Financial Statements for additional discussion of ARO obligations.obligations and adjustments made to the ARO obligation estimates during the years ended 2020, 2019 and 2018.



Impairment of Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets


We evaluate long-lived assets (including intangible assets with finite lives) for impairment, in accordance with accounting standards related to impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. For our generation assets, possible indications include an expectation of continuing long-term declines in natural gas prices and/or market heat rates or an expectation that "more likely than not" a generation asset will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its estimated useful life. The determination of the existence of these and other indications of impairment involves judgments that are subjective in nature and may require the use of estimates in forecasting future results and cash flows related to an asset or group of assets. Further, the unique nature of our property, plant and equipment, which includes a fleet of generation assets with a diverse fuel mix and individual generation units that have varying production or output rates, requires the use of significant judgments in determining the existence of impairment indications and the grouping of assets for impairment testing. We generally utilizeSee Note 21 to the Financial Statements for discussion of impairments of long-lived assets recorded in 2020.

Recoverability of long-lived assets is determined by a comparison of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset group to the net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group, through considering specific assumptions for forward natural gas and electricity prices, forward capacity prices, the effects of enacted environmental rules, generation plant performance, forecasted capital expenditures, forecasted fuel prices and forecasted operating costs. The carrying value of such asset groups is determined to be unrecoverable if the projected undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value.

If an income approach measurementasset group carrying value is determined to derivebe unrecoverable, fair valuesvalue will be calculated based on a market participant view and a loss will be recorded for our long-lived generation assets.the amount the carrying value exceeds the fair value. Fair value is determined primarily by discounted cash flows (income approach) and supported by available market valuations, if applicable. The income approach involves estimates of future performance that reflect assumptions regarding, among other things, forward natural gas and electricity prices, forward capacity prices, market heat rates, the effects of enacted environmental rules, generation plant performance, forecasted capital expenditures and forecasted fuel prices. Another key assumption in the income approach is the discount rate applied to the forecasted cash flows. Any significant change to one or more of these factors can have a material impact on the fair value measurement of our long-lived assets. Additional material impairments related to our generation facilities may occur in the future if forward wholesale electricity prices decline in the markets in which we operate in or if additional environmental regulations increase the cost of producing electricity at our generation facilities.


63
Table of Contents
Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, such as the intangible asset related to the trade names of TXU EnergyTM, Ambit Energy, 4Change EnergyTM, Homefield, and Dynegy Energy Services, brands,TriEagle Energy, Public Power and U.S. Gas & Electric, respectively, are required to be testedevaluated for impairment at least annually (as of the Effective Date, we(we have selected October 1 as our annual goodwill test date) or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an impairment may exist, such as the indicators used to evaluate impairments to long-lived assets discussed above or declines in values of comparable public companies in our industry. Accounting standards allow a company to qualitatively assess if the carrying value of a reporting unit with goodwill is more likely than not less than the fair value of that reporting unit. If the entity determines the carrying value, including goodwill, is not more likely greater than the fair value, no further testing of goodwill for impairment is required. On the most recent goodwill testing date, we applied qualitative factors and determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our ERCOT Retail and Texas Generation reporting unitunits exceeded itstheir carrying value at October 1, 2018.2020. Significant qualitative factors evaluated included reporting unit financial performance and market multiples, cost factors, customer attrition, interest rates and changes in reporting unit book value.


Accounting guidance requires goodwill to be allocated to our reporting units, and at December 31, 2018, $1.9072020, $2.461 billion of our goodwill was allocated to our ERCOT Retail reporting unit and $161$122 million arose in connection with the Merger and is recorded at the corporate and other level non-segment operations pending completion of the purchase price allocation in the first quarter of 2019, at which time goodwill will bewas allocated to our Texas Generation reporting units.unit. Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the reporting unit level. Under this goodwill impairment analysis, if at the assessment date, a reporting unit's carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value (enterprise value), the estimated enterprise value of the reporting unit is compared to the estimated fair values of the reporting unit's assets (including identifiable intangible assets) and liabilities at the assessment date, and the resultant implied goodwill amount is then compared to the recorded goodwill amount. Any excess of the recorded goodwill amount over the implied goodwill amount is written off as an impairment charge.


The determination of enterprise value of a reporting unit involves a number of assumptions and estimates. We use a combination of fair value measurements to estimate enterprise values of our reporting units including: internal discounted cash flow analyses (income approach), and comparable publicly traded company values (market approach). The income approach involves estimates of future performance that reflect assumptions regarding, among other things, forward natural gas and electricity prices, market heat rates, the effects of environmental rules, generation plant performance, forecasted capital expenditures and retail sales volume trends, as well as determination of a terminal value. Another key variable in the income approach is the discount rate, or weighted average cost of capital, applied to the forecasted cash flows. The determination of the discount rate takes into consideration the capital structure, credit ratings and current debt yields of comparable publicly traded companies as well as an estimate of return on equity that reflects historical market returns and current market volatility for the industry. The market approach involves using trading multiples of EBITDA of those selected publicly traded companies to derive appropriate multiples to apply to the EBITDA of our reporting units. Critical judgments include the selection of publicly traded comparable companies and the weighting of the value metrics in developing the best estimate of enterprise value.





64
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Vistra Energy Consolidated Financial Results — Successor YearsYear Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through2020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2016
 Successor
 Year Ended December 31, 
Favorable (Unfavorable)
$ Change
 Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
 2018 2017  
Operating revenues$9,144
 $5,430
 $3,714
 $1,191
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(5,036) (2,935) (2,101) (720)
Operating costs(1,297) (973) (324) (208)
Depreciation and amortization(1,394) (699) (695) (216)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(926) (600) (326) (208)
Impairment of long-lived assets—
 (25) 25
 —
Operating income491
 198
 293
 (161)
Other income47
 37
 10
 10
Other deductions(5) (5) —
 —
Interest expense and related charges(572) (193) (379) (60)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement(79) 213
 (292) (22)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment17
 —
 17
 —
Income before income taxes(101) 250
 (351) (233)
Income tax (expense) benefit45
 (504) 549
 70
Net income (loss)$(56) $(254) $198
 $(163)

 Successor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018
 Retail ERCOT PJM NY/NE MISO 
Asset
Closure
 Eliminations / Corporate and Other 
Vistra
Energy Consolidated
Operating revenues$5,597
 $2,634
 $1,725
 $817
 $720
 $50
 $(2,399) $9,144
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(4,126) (1,521) (917) (485) (420) (40) 2,473
 (5,036)
Operating costs(39) (677) (243) (74) (202) (43) (19) (1,297)
Depreciation and amortization(318) (416) (413) (152) (9) —
 (86) (1,394)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(424) (90) (52) (36) (53) (17) (254) (926)
Operating income (loss)690
 (70) 100
 70
 36
 (50) (285) 491
Other income29
 34
 1
 —
 —
 2
 (19) 47
Other deductions—
 (7) —
 —
 —
 (1) 3
 (5)
Interest expense and related charges(7) (12) (8) (2) (1) —
 (542) (572)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 (79) (79)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment—
 —
 7
 11
 —
 —
 (1) 17
Income (loss) before income taxes712
 (55) 100
 79
 35
 (49) (923) (101)
Income tax benefit—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 45
 45
Net income (loss)$712
 $(55) $100
 $79
 $35
 $(49) $(878) $(56)


 Successor
 Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Retail ERCOT 
Asset
Closure
 Eliminations / Corporate and Other 
Vistra
Energy Consolidated
Operating revenues$4,058
 $1,794
 $964
 $(1,386) $5,430
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(2,733) (981) (607) 1,386
 (2,935)
Operating costs(14) (578) (380) (1) (973)
Depreciation and amortization(430) (229) (1) (39) (699)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(420) (124) (19) (37) (600)
Impairment of long-lived assets—
 —
 (25) —
 (25)
Operating income (loss)461
 (118) (68) (77) 198
Other income34
 24
 6
 (27) 37
Other deductions—
 (3) (1) (1) (5)
Interest expense and related charges—
 (21) —
 (172) (193)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement—
 —
 —
 213
 213
Income (loss) before income taxes495
 (118) (63) (64) 250
Income tax expense—
 —
 —
 (504) (504)
Net income (loss)$495
 $(118) $(63) $(568) $(254)

We believe 2018 was a very successful year for Vistra Energy. We completed the transformational Merger with Dynegy in April. We reduced post-acquisition consolidated debt by approximately $1.7 billion2019 and refinanced an additional approximately $11 billion of debt and revolving credit commitments at lower interest rates and extended maturities. We completed construction of the Upton 2 solar project and our first battery storage facility located at the Upton 2 site. In addition, we were awarded a contract to develop the largest battery storage facility in North America. In 2018, we also executed a balanced capital allocation plan, returning approximately $762 million to stockholders via share repurchases. For the year endedYear Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018 net loss includes $380 million in unrealized mark-to-market losses on commodity risk management activity in 2018 resulting from higher forward power prices, principally driven by higher market heat rates. Our

Year Ended December 31,2020 vs 2019
Favorable (Unfavorable)
$ Change		2019 vs 2018
Favorable (Unfavorable)
$ Change
202020192018
Operating revenues$11,443 $11,809 $9,144 $(366)$2,665 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(5,174)(5,742)(5,036)568 (706)
Operating costs(1,622)(1,530)(1,297)(92)(233)
Depreciation and amortization(1,737)(1,640)(1,394)(97)(246)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(1,035)(904)(926)(131)22 
Impairment of long-lived assets(356)— — (356)— 
Operating income1,519 1,993 491 (474)1,502 
Other income34 56 47 (22)9 
Other deductions(42)(15)(5)(27)(10)
Interest expense and related charges(630)(797)(572)167 (225)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement5 (37)(79)42 42 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment4 16 17 (12)(1)
Income (loss) before income taxes890 1,216 (101)(326)1,317 
Income tax (expense) benefit(266)(290)45 24 (335)
Net income (loss)$624 $926 $(56)$(302)$982 


Year Ended December 31, 2020
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure		Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra Consolidated
Operating revenues$8,270 $4,116 $2,415 $282 $1,252 $3 $(4,895)$11,443 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(6,857)(1,078)(1,262)(168)(704)— 4,895 (5,174)
Operating costs(123)(727)(270)(30)(408)(63)(1)(1,622)
Depreciation and amortization(303)(475)(721)(19)(133)(22)(64)(1,737)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(675)(75)(89)(26)(71)(27)(72)(1,035)
Impairment of long-lived assets— — — — (356)— — (356)
Operating income (loss)312 1,761 73 39 (420)(109)(137)1,519 
Other income6 3 1 1 6 10 7 34 
Other deductions1 (12)(30)— 2 (2)(1)(42)
Interest expense and related charges(10)8 (7)10 (2)— (629)(630)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement— — — — — — 5 5 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment— — 4 — — — — 4 
Income (loss) before income taxes309 1,760 41 50 (414)(101)(755)890 
Income tax expense— — — — — — (266)(266)
Net income (loss)$309 $1,760 $41 $50 $(414)$(101)$(1,021)$624 

65
Table of Contents

Year Ended December 31, 2019
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure		Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra Consolidated
Operating revenues$6,872 $3,836 $2,790 $338 $1,602 $341 $(3,970)$11,809 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(5,816)(1,283)(1,393)(187)(767)(267)3,971 (5,742)
Operating costs(71)(691)(236)(27)(366)(138)(1)(1,530)
Depreciation and amortization(292)(472)(680)(19)(120)— (57)(1,640)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(538)(76)(83)(17)(78)(43)(69)(904)
Operating income (loss)155 1,314 398 88 271 (107)(126)1,993 
Other income— 28 — — 7 3 18 56 
Other deductions— (8)(1)— — (5)(1)(15)
Interest expense and related charges(21)8 (13)— (4)— (767)(797)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement— — — — — — (37)(37)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment— — 16 — — — — 16 
Income (loss) before income taxes134 1,342 400 88 274 (109)(913)1,216 
Income tax expense—��— — — — — (290)(290)
Net income (loss)$134 $1,342 $400 $88 $274 $(109)$(1,203)$926 


Year Ended December 31, 2018
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure		Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra Consolidated
Operating revenues$5,597 $2,497 $1,895 $208 $1,183 $371 $(2,607)$9,144 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(4,126)(1,461)(1,131)(134)(505)(286)2,607 (5,036)
Operating costs(39)(661)(164)(17)(305)(109)(2)(1,297)
Depreciation and amortization(318)(390)(519)(14)(81)— (72)(1,394)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(424)(88)(71)(8)(50)(39)(246)(926)
Operating income (loss)690 (103)10 35 242 (63)(320)491 
Other income29 34 1 — — 2 (19)47 
Other deductions— (7)(1)— 1 (1)3 (5)
Interest expense and related charges(7)(12)(10)(1)(1)— (541)(572)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement— — — — — — (79)(79)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment— — 18 — — — (1)17 
Income (loss) before income taxes712 (88)18 34 242 (62)(957)(101)
Income tax benefit— — — — — — 45 45 
Net income (loss)$712 $(88)$18 $34 $242 $(62)$(912)$(56)

66
Table of Contents
In 2020, our operating segments delivered strong operating performance with a disciplined focus on cost management, while generating and selling essential electricity in a safe and reliable manner.manner during a period of significant economic disruption. Our performance reflected the stability of our integrated model, including a diversified generation fleet, retail and commercial and hedging activities in support of our integrated business, to produce results that exceeded expectations and generated significant cash from operations of $3.337 billion for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase of 22% versus 2019 was particularly strong given the general uncertainty in the overall economy and the challenges of dealing with COVID-19.


Consolidated results increased $198decreased $302 million to net lossincome of $56$624 million in the year ended December 31, 20182020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2017.2019. The change in results was driven by additional operations acquireda $465 million pre-tax decrease in unrealized gains on commodity hedging transactions, a $356 million pre-tax impairment of assets related to our Kincaid, Zimmer and Joppa/EEI coal generation facilities and a $29 million pre-tax loss on disposal of our equity method investment in NELP, offset by strong operating results, particularly in the Merger, increased prices and volumes in the ERCOT segment, favorable volumes in the RetailTexas segment, and the impactaddition of Crius and Ambit. See Note 21 to the Comanche Peak outageFinancial Statements.

Operating costs increased $92 million to $1.622 billion in 2017the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019 primarily driven by higher estimated costs for ARO, increased LTSA costs and related insurance proceeds,COVID-related expenses and increased operating costs in Retail driven by the acquisition of Ambit and Crius, partially offset by lower property taxes.

SG&A expense increased unrealized mark-to-market losses on commodity risk management activity, one-time Merger-related expenses including severance$131 million to $1.035 billion in the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019 primarily due to the increased expense resulting from the acquisition of Crius in July 2019 and transaction fees and the first quarter of 2018 plant retirements.Ambit in November 2019.


Interest expense and related charges increased $379decreased $167 million to $572$630 million in the year ended December 31, 20182020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2017 and reflected2019 driven by a $324$109 million increasedecrease in interest expense incurredpaid/accrued reflecting long-term debt assumedthe reduction in higher interest Vistra senior unsecured notes through the Merger, $34Redemptions and Tender Offers in 2019 and 2020 and a $65 million changedecrease in unrealized mark-to-market gains/losses on interest rate swapsswaps. Debt extinguishment gains totaled $17 million and a debt extinguishment loss of $27$21 million in 2018.the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. See Note 1121 to the Financial Statements.


For the yearyears ended December 31, 2018,2020 and 2019, the Impactsimpacts of the Tax Receivable Agreement totaled expense of $79 million and reflected a loss due to changes in the estimated amount and timing of TRA payments totaling $14 million and accretion expense totaling $65 million. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Impacts of the Tax Receivable Agreement totaled income of $213$5 million and reflected a gain due to changes in the estimated timingexpense of TRA payments totaling $295$37 million, partially offset by accretion expense totaling $82 million.respectively. See Note 108 to the Financial Statements for discussion of the impacts of the Tax Receivable Agreement Obligation.TRA obligation.


For the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, income tax benefitexpense totaled $45$266 million and the effective tax rate was 44.6%29.9%. For the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, income tax expensebenefit totaled $504 million. The$290 million and the effective tax rate in 2017 of 201.6% was higher than the U.S. Federal Statutory rate of 35% primarily due to a $451 million reduction of deferred tax assets related to the decrease in the corporate rate in the TCJA, partially offset by $80 million of tax impacts related to nondeductible TRA accretion.23.8%. See Note 97 to the Financial Statements for reconciliation of the effective rates to the U.S. federal statutory rate.



 Successor
 Period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016
 Retail ERCOT Asset Closure Eliminations / Corporate and Other 
Vistra
Energy Consolidated
Operating revenues$912
 $212
 $238
 $(171) $1,191
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(515) (214) (162) 171
 (720)
Operating costs(3) (151) (54) —
 (208)
Depreciation and amortization(153) (53) —
 (10) (216)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(130) (65) (6) (7) (208)
Operating income (loss)111
 (271) 16
 (17) (161)
Other income3
 2
 1
 4
 10
Interest expense and related charges—
 1
 —
 (61) (60)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement—
 —
 —
 (22) (22)
Income (loss) before income taxes114
 $(268) $17
 (96) (233)
Income tax benefit—
 —
 —
 70
 70
Net income (loss)$114
 $(268) $17
 $(26) $(163)

Consolidated net loss totaled $163 million forFor the period from October 3, 2016 throughyears ended December 31, 2016. Results were primarily driven by:2020 and 2019, consolidated cash flows from operations totaled $3.337 billion and $2.736 billion, respectively.


Retail segment net income of $114 million for the period, which was primarily driven by favorable profit margins, including $113 million of unrealized gains in purchased power costs on positions with the ERCOT segment.
ERCOT segment net loss of $268 million for the period, which was primarily driven by unrealized mark-to-market losses on commodity risk management activities totaling $273 million for the period (including $113 million of unrealized losses on positions with the Retail segment and $22 million of unrealized gains on hedging activities for fuel and purchased power costs). The unrealized losses were driven by increases in forward natural gas prices during the period.

Interest expense and related charges totaled $60 million and reflected $51 million of interest expense incurred and $11 million of unrealized mark-to-market losses on interest rate swaps (see Note 11 to the Financial Statements).

Impacts of the Tax Receivable Agreement were a loss of $22 million, which reflected accretion expense during the period. See Note 10 to the Financial Statements for discussion of the impacts of the Tax Receivable Agreement obligation.

Income tax benefit totaled $70 million. The effective tax rate was 30.0%. See Note 9 to the Financial Statements for reconciliation of this effective rate to the U.S. federal statutory rate.

Discussion of Adjusted EBITDA


Non-GAAP Measures—In analyzing and planning for our business, we supplement our use of GAAP financial measures with non-GAAP financial measures, including EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as performance measures. These non-GAAP financial measures reflect an additional way of viewing aspects of our business that, when viewed with our GAAP results and the accompanying reconciliations to corresponding GAAP financial measures included in the tables below, may provide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be relied upon to the exclusion of GAAP financial measures and are, by definition an incomplete understanding of Vistra Energy and must be considered in conjunction with GAAP measures. In addition, non-GAAP financial measures are not standardized; therefore, it may not be possible to compare these financial measures with other companies' non-GAAP financial measures having the same or similar names. We strongly encourage investors to review our consolidated financial statements and publicly filed reports in their entirety and not rely on any single financial measure.



67
Table of Contents
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA—We believe EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provide meaningful representations of our operating performance. We consider EBITDA as another way to measure financial performance on an ongoing basis. Adjusted EBITDA is meant to reflect the operating performance of our segments for the period presented. We define EBITDA as earnings (loss) before interest expense, income tax expense (benefit) and depreciation and amortization expense. We define Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA adjusted to exclude (i) gains or losses on the sale or retirement of certain assets, (ii) the impacts of mark-to-market changes on derivatives, related to our portfolio, (iii) the impact of impairment charges, (iv) certain amounts associated with fresh-start reporting, acquisitions, dispositions, transition costs or restructurings, (v) non-cash compensation expense, (vi) impacts from the Tax Receivable Agreement and (vii) other material nonrecurring or unusual items.


Because EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are financial measures that management uses to allocate resources, determine our ability to fund capital expenditures, assess performance against our peers, and evaluate overall financial performance, we believe they provide useful information for our shareholders.investors.


When EBITDA or Adjusted EBITDA is discussed in reference to performance on a consolidated basis, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA is Net income (loss).


Adjusted EBITDA — Successor YearsYear Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019 and Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018

Year Ended December 31,2020 vs 2019
Favorable (Unfavorable)
$ Change		2019 vs 2018
Favorable (Unfavorable)
$ Change
202020192018
Net income (loss)$624 $926 $(56)$(302)$982 
Income tax expense (benefit)266 290 (45)(24)335 
Interest expense and related charges (a)630 797 572 (167)225 
Depreciation and amortization (b)1,812 1,713 1,472 99 241 
EBITDA3,332 3,726 1,943 (394)1,783 
Unrealized net (gain) loss resulting from commodity hedging transactions(231)(696)380 465 (1,076)
Generation plant retirement expenses43 54 — (11)54 
Fresh start/purchase accounting impacts38 30 41 8 (11)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement(5)37 79 (42)(42)
Non-cash compensation expenses63 48 73 15 (25)
Transition and merger expenses16 115 233 (99)(118)
Impairment of long-lived assets356 — — 356 — 
Loss on disposal of investment in NELP29 — — 29 — 
COVID-19-related expenses (c)25 — — 25 — 
Odessa earnout buybacks— — 18 — (18)
Other, net19 11 (7)8 18 
Adjusted EBITDA$3,685 $3,325 $2,760 $360 $565 
____________
(a)Includes unrealized mark-to-market net losses on interest rate swaps of $155 million, $220 million and $5 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
(b)Includes nuclear fuel amortization in the Texas segment of $75 million, $73 million and 2017$78 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
(c)Includes material and supplies and other incremental costs related to our COVID-19 response.

68
Table of Contents
Vistra recorded its strongest performance in 2020 with Adjusted EBITDA of $3.685 billion, up nearly 11% versus 2019, despite economic challenges and uncertainties dealing with COVID-19. This performance exceeded our expectations set prior to the onset of the pandemic. Our balanced business was driven by strong performance in our Retail segment, delivering $983 million of Adjusted EBITDA, and our Texas generation segment, which delivered $1.646 billion of Adjusted EBITDA. Our other segments, including East, West, Sunset, Asset Closure and Corp delivered $1.056 billion. The performance of our Retail business on a variety of metrics, including customer satisfaction, customer count and margin are all strong. In Generation, we exceeded our commercial availability and safety targets. Our people drove strong results through our Operations Performance Initiative driving incremental gross margin and cost reduction opportunities, and our Best Defense safety program. Finally, our Commercial team optimized our integrated operations through disciplined risk management and hedging activities to ensure we lock in value for our generation business, while cost effectively supplying our retail business. This strong collaboration among our segments has produced consistent, strong results in each year since Vistra became a public company in 2016.


Year Ended December 31, 2020
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure		Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra
Consolidated
Net income (loss)$309 $1,760 $41 $50 $(414)$(101)$(1,021)$624 
Income tax expense— — — — — — 266 266 
Interest expense and related charges (a)10 (8)7 (10)2 — 629 630 
Depreciation and amortization (b)303 550 721 19 133 22 64 1,812 
EBITDA622 2,302 769 59 (279)(79)(62)3,332 
Unrealized net (gain) loss resulting from commodity hedging transactions340 (691)15 10 95 — — (231)
Generation plant retirement expenses— — — — 43 — — 43 
Fresh start/purchase accounting impacts5 (8)22 — 19 — — 38 
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement— — — — — — (5)(5)
Non-cash compensation expenses— — — — — — 63 63 
Transition and merger expenses5 2 1 — — (3)11 16 
Impairment of long-lived assets— — — — 356 — — 356 
Loss on disposal of investment in NELP— — 29 — — — — 29 
COVID-19-related expenses (c)— 15 3 — 5 — 2 25 
Other, net11 26 10 4 3 1 (36)19 
Adjusted EBITDA$983 $1,646 $849 $73 $242 $(81)$(27)$3,685 
____________
(a)Includes $155 million of unrealized mark-to-market net losses on interest rate swaps.
(b)Includes nuclear fuel amortization of $75 million in the Texas segment.
(c)Includes material and supplies and other incremental costs related to our COVID-19 response.

69
Table of Contents

Year Ended December 31, 2019
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure		Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra
Consolidated
Net income (loss)$134 $1,342 $400 $88 $274 $(109)$(1,203)$926 
Income tax expense— — — — — — 290 290 
Interest expense and related charges (a)21 (8)13 — 4 — 767 797 
Depreciation and amortization (b)292 545 680 19 120 — 57 1,713 
EBITDA447 1,879 1,093 107 398 (109)(89)3,726 
Unrealized net (gain) loss resulting from commodity hedging transactions278 (591)(196)(41)(146)— — (696)
Generation plant retirement expenses— — — — 12 42 — 54 
Fresh start/purchase accounting impacts23 (4)4 (4)14 (3)— 30 
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement— — — — — — 37 37 
Non-cash compensation expenses— — — — — — 48 48 
Transition and merger expenses49 11 9 1 22 — 23 115 
Other, net10 12 15 — 8 2 (36)11 
Adjusted EBITDA$807 $1,307 $925 $63 $308 $(68)$(17)$3,325 
____________
(a)Includes $220 million of unrealized mark-to-market net losses on interest rate swaps.
(b)Includes nuclear fuel amortization of $73 million in the Texas segment.


Year Ended December 31, 2018
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure		Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra
Consolidated
Net income (loss)$712 $(88)$18 $34 $242 $(62)$(912)$(56)
Income tax benefit— — — — — — (45)(45)
Interest expense and related charges (a)7 12 10 (1)1 — 543 572 
Depreciation and amortization (b)318 468 519 14 81 — 72 1,472 
EBITDA1,037 392 547 47 324 (62)(342)1,943 
Unrealized net (gain) loss resulting from commodity hedging transactions(206)498 81 15 (8)— — 380 
Fresh start/purchase accounting impacts26 (4)11 — 7 1 — 41 
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement— — — — — — 79 79 
Non-cash compensation expenses— — — — — — 73 73 
Transition and merger expenses1 9 16 1 9 2 195 233 
Odessa earnout buybacks— 18 — — — — — 18 
Other, net(13)(1)25 2 9 (4)(25)(7)
Adjusted EBITDA$845 $912 $680 $65 $341 $(63)$(20)$2,760 
____________
(a)Includes $5 million of unrealized mark-to-market net losses on interest rate swaps.
(b)Includes nuclear fuel amortization of $78 million in the Texas segment.

70
Table of Contents
Retail Segment — Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019

Year Ended December 31,Favorable (Unfavorable)
Change
20202019
Operating revenues:
Revenues in ERCOT$5,880 $5,061 $819 
Revenues in Northeast/Midwest2,406 1,818 588 
Amortization expense(5)(15)10 
Other revenues(11)8 (19)
Total operating revenues$8,270 $6,872 $1,398 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees:
Purchases from affiliates(4,566)(3,571)(995)
Unrealized net losses on hedging activities with affiliates(329)(305)(24)
Unrealized net gains on hedging activities— 19 (19)
Delivery fees(1,893)(1,629)(264)
Other costs (a)(69)(330)261 
Total fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees$(6,857)$(5,816)$(1,041)
Net income$309 $134 $175 
Adjusted EBITDA$983 $807 $176 
Retail sales volumes (GWh):
Retail electricity sales volumes:
Sales volumes in ERCOT54,075 47,345 6,730 
Sales volumes in Northeast/Midwest36,274 30,255 6,019 
Total retail electricity sales volumes90,349 77,600 12,749 
Weather (North Texas average) - percent of normal (b):
Cooling degree days90.0 %96.0 %
Heating degree days91.0 %113.0 %
____________
(a)For the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, includes third-party fuel and power purchases of $69 million and $329 million, respectively.
(b)Weather data is obtained from Weatherbank, Inc. For the year ended December 31, 2020, normal is defined as the average over the 10-year period from October 3, 2016 throughDecember 2010 to December 2019. For the year ended December 31, 20162019, normal is defined as the average over the 10-year period from December 2009 to December 2018.

 Successor
 Year Ended December 31, 
Favorable (Unfavorable)
$ Change
 Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
 2018 2017  
Net income (loss)$(56) $(254) $198
 $(163)
Income tax expense (benefit)(45) 504
 (549) (70)
Interest expense and related charges572
 193
 379
 60
Depreciation and amortization (a)1,472
 781
 691
 247
EBITDA before Adjustments1,943
 1,224
 719
 74
Unrealized net loss resulting from hedging transactions380
 146
 234
 165
Generation plant retirement expenses—
 206
 (206) —
Fresh start/purchase accounting impacts41
 59
 (18) 35
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement79
 (213) 292
 22
Reorganization items and restructuring expenses—
 3
 (3) 18
Non-cash compensation expenses73
 19
 54
 —
Transition and merger expenses233
 27
 206
 —
Severance—
 —
 —
 44
Other, net(7) (16) 9
 10
Adjusted EBITDA, including Odessa earnout buybacks$2,742
 $1,455
 $1,287
 $368
Odessa earnout buybacks18
 —
 18
  
Adjusted EBITDA$2,760
 $1,455
 $1,305
  
____________
(a)Includes nuclear fuel amortization in the ERCOT segment of $78 million, $82Net income increased by $175 million to $309 million and $31 million for the Successor period for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016, respectively.


 Successor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018
 Retail ERCOT PJM NY/NE MISO 
Asset
Closure
 Eliminations / Corporate and Other 
Vistra
Energy Consolidated
Net income (loss)$712
 $(55) $100
 $79
 $35
 $(49) $(878) $(56)
Income tax benefit—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 (45) (45)
Interest expense and related charges7
 12
 8
 2
 1
 —
 542
 572
Depreciation and amortization (a)318
 494
 413
 152
 9
 —
 86
 1,472
EBITDA before Adjustments1,037
 451
 521
 233
 45
 (49) (295) 1,943
Unrealized net (gain) loss resulting from hedging transactions(206) 498
 42
 40
 (9) —
 15
 380
Fresh start/purchase accounting impacts26
 (6) (1) 9
 12
 1
 —
 41
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 79
 79
Non-cash compensation expenses—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 73
 73
Transition and merger expenses1
 9
 14
 2
 9
 2
 196
 233
Other, net(13) (2) 16
 9
 9
 (3) (23) (7)
Adjusted EBITDA, including Odessa earnout buybacks845
 950
 592
 293
 66
 (49) $45
 2,742
Odessa earnout buybacks
 18
 
 
 
 
   18
Adjusted EBITDA$845
 $968
 $592
 $293
 $66
 $(49) $45
 $2,760
____________
(a)Includes nuclear fuel amortization of $78 million in ERCOT segment.

 Successor
 Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Retail ERCOT 
Asset
Closure
 Eliminations / Corporate and Other 
Vistra
Energy Consolidated
Net income (loss)$495
 $(118) $(63) $(568) $(254)
Income tax expense—
 —
 —
 504
 504
Interest expense and related charges—
 21
 —
 172
 193
Depreciation and amortization (a)430
 311
 1
 39
 781
EBITDA before Adjustments925
 214
 (62) 147
 1,224
Unrealized net (gain) loss resulting from hedging transactions(171) 317
 —
 —
 146
Generation plant retirement expenses—
 —
 206
 —
 206
Fresh start accounting impacts46
 (1) 14
 —
 59
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement—
 —
 —
 (213) (213)
Reorganization items and restructuring expenses—
 —
 —
 3
 3
Non-cash compensation expenses—
 —
 —
 19
 19
Transition and merger expenses1
 8
 —
 18
 27
Other, net(22) —
 —
 6
 (16)
Adjusted EBITDA$779
 $538
 $158
 $(20) $1,455
____________
(a)Includes nuclear fuel amortization of $82 million in ERCOT segment.


Adjusted EBITDA increased by $1,305$176 million to $2,760$983 million in the year ended December 31, 20182020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to the following:2019.
PJM, MISO and NY/NE segments acquired in the Merger$950
Increase in ERCOT segment driven by operations acquired in the Merger and Odessa, higher realized prices and the impact of the Comanche Peak outage in 2017 and related insurance proceeds in 2018430
Increase in Retail segment driven by favorable volumes in ERCOT and Midwest/Northeast retail businesses acquired in the Merger66
Decrease in Asset Closure segment driven by retirement of facilities in first quarter of 2018, partially offset by the change in estimates for certain AROs in 2018(207)
Corporate and Other due in part to operations acquired in the Merger66
Total$1,305

 Successor
 Period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016
 Retail ERCOT 
Asset
Closure
 Eliminations / Corporate and Other 
Vistra
Energy Consolidated
Net income (loss)$114
 $(268) $17
 $(26) $(163)
Income tax benefit—
 —
 —
 (70) (70)
Interest expense and related charges—
 (1) —
 61
 60
Depreciation and amortization (a)153
 84
 —
 10
 247
EBITDA before Adjustments267
 (185) 17
 (25) 74
Unrealized net (gain) loss resulting from hedging transactions(107) 272
 —
 —
 165
Fresh start accounting impacts36
 (4) 3
 —
 35
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement—
 —
 —
 22
 22
Reorganization items and restructuring expenses7
 7
 —
 4
 18
Severance9
 33
 2
 —
 44
Other, net1
 9
 —
 —
 10
Adjusted EBITDA$213
 $132
 $22
 $1
 $368
____________
(a)Includes nuclear fuelYear Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to 2019
Margin primarily driven by the addition of Crius acquired in July 2019 and Ambit acquired in November 2019$339 
Other driven by higher operating costs and SG&A expense (including bad debt expense) primarily due to the addition of Crius and Ambit(162)
Change in Adjusted EBITDA$177
Change in depreciation and amortization expenses driven by Crius/Ambit intangibles(11)
(Unfavorable) impact of $31 millionhigher unrealized net losses on commodity hedging activities(62)
Lower transition and merger and other expenses71 
Change in ERCOT segment.Net income$175



Retail Segment
71
Table of Contents
Generation — Year Ended December 31, 20182020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20182019

 Year Ended December 31, 
Favorable (Unfavorable)
Change
 2018 2017 
Operating revenues:     
Revenues in ERCOT$4,426
 $4,002
 $424
Revenues in Northeast/Midwest1,123
 —
 1,123
Amortization expense(26) (46) 20
Other revenues74
 102
 (28)
Total operating revenues$5,597
 $4,058
 $1,539
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees:     
Purchases from affiliates(2,846) (1,539) (1,307)
Unrealized net gains on hedging activities with affiliates218
 154
 64
Delivery fees(1,493) (1,345) (148)
Other costs(5) (3) (2)
Total fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees$(4,126) $(2,733) $(1,393)
Net income$712
 $495
 $217
Adjusted EBITDA$845
 $779
 $66
Sales volumes (GWh):     
Retail electricity sales volumes:     
Sales volumes in ERCOT42,992
 39,032
 3,960
Sales volumes in Northeast/Midwest20,739
 —
 20,739
Total retail electricity sales volumes63,731
 39,032
 24,699
Weather (North Texas average) - percent of normal (a):     
Cooling degree days103.0% 99.1%  
Heating degree days112.0% 72.0%  
____________
(a)Weather data is obtained from Weatherbank, Inc. For the year ended December 31, 2018, normal is defined as the average over the 10-year period from 2008 to 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2017, normal is defined as the average over the 10-year period from 2007 to 2016.

Net income increased by $217 million to net income of $712 million and Adjusted EBITDA increased by $66 million to $845 million and in the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to the following:
Favorable volumes primarily due to weather in ERCOT$53
Margins in Midwest/Northeast acquired in the Merger34
Unfavorable margins in ERCOT primarily due to higher power costs(21)
Change in Adjusted EBITDA$66
Lower depreciation and amortization expenses driven by reduced amortization of the retail customer relationship132
Favorable impact of unrealized net gains on hedging activities34
Higher other expenses(15)
Change in Net income$217


ERCOT Segment — Year Ended December 31, 2018 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Year Ended December 31, 
Favorable (Unfavorable)
Change
 2018 2017 
Operating revenues:     
Wholesale electricity sales$1,289
 $523
 $766
Sales to affiliates1,829
 1,539
 290
Rolloff of unrealized net gains (losses) representing positions settled in the current period404
 (184) 588
Unrealized net gains (losses) from changes in fair value(689) 33
 (722)
Unrealized net losses on hedging activities with affiliates(198) (154) (44)
Other revenues(1) 37
 (38)
Operating revenues$2,634
 $1,794
 $840
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees:     
Fuel for generation facilities and purchased power costs(1,367) (881) (486)
Unrealized losses from hedging activities(15) (12) (3)
Ancillary and other costs(139) (88) (51)
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees$(1,521) $(981) $(540)
Net loss$(55) $(118) $63
Adjusted EBITDA$968
 $538
 $430
Production volumes (GWh):     
Nuclear facilities20,416
 16,921
 3,495
Lignite and coal facilities29,151
 26,043
 3,108
Natural gas facilities35,790
 18,522
 17,268
Solar facilities344
 —
 344
Capacity factors:     
Nuclear facilities101.3% 84.0%  
Lignite and coal facilities76.9% 77.2%  
CCGT facilities58.8% 52.3%  
Market pricing:     
Average ERCOT North power price ($/MWh)$29.96
 $23.26
 $6.70


Net loss increased by $63 million to $55 million net loss and Adjusted EBITDA increased by $430 million to $968 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to the following:
Favorable margins driven by higher realized power prices and increased production from legacy gas and coal generation$180
Impact of operations acquired in the Merger73
Impact related to Comanche Peak outage in 201774
Impact of full year of operations from Odessa acquired in 201786
Lower selling, general and administrative expenses34
Insurance reimbursement for Comanche Peak21
Other(38)
Change in Adjusted EBITDA$430
Increased depreciation and amortization driven by facilities acquired in the Merger(183)
Unfavorable impact of unrealized net losses on hedging activities(182)
Partial buybacks of the Odessa earn-out provision in 2018(18)
Other(2)
Change in Net loss$63


PJM, NY/NE and MISO Segments — Year Ended December 31, 2018
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31, 2018TexasEastWestSunset
PJM NY/NE MISO20202019202020192020201920202019
Operating revenues:     Operating revenues:
Energy$775
 $582
 $370
Capacity369
 239
 53
Electricity salesElectricity sales$896 $1,048 $833 $1,355 $289 $293 $883 $969 
Capacity revenue from ISO/RTOCapacity revenue from ISO/RTO— — (52)170 — — 164 197 
Sales to affiliatesSales to affiliates2,543 2,213 1,655 1,074 3 — 365 285 
Rolloff of unrealized net gains (losses) representing positions settled in the current periodRolloff of unrealized net gains (losses) representing positions settled in the current period2 371 159 59 (22)(10)(205)(74)
Unrealized net gains (losses) on hedging activities(17) (37) (13)Unrealized net gains (losses) on hedging activities217 72 (121)(44)12 51 133 249 
Sales to affiliates628
 44
 302
Unrealized net gains (losses) on hedging activities with affiliates(33) (3) 16
Unrealized net gains (losses) on hedging activities with affiliates458 132 (61)180 — — (68)(7)
Other revenues3
 (8) (8)Other revenues— — 2 (4)— 4 (20)(17)
Operating revenues$1,725
 $817
 $720
Operating revenues4,116 3,836 2,415 2,790 282 338 1,252 1,602 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees:     Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees:
Fuel for generation facilities and purchased power costs(916) (479) (449)Fuel for generation facilities and purchased power costs(960)(1,117)(1,225)(1,381)(166)(187)(744)(739)
Fuel for generation facilities and purchased power costs from affiliates(8) —
 30
Fuel for generation facilities and purchased power costs from affiliates6 — (8)(2)— — 2 2 
Unrealized gains from hedging activities8
 —
 6
Other costs(1) (6) (7)
Unrealized (gains) losses from hedging activitiesUnrealized (gains) losses from hedging activities14 16 8 1 — — 45 (22)
Ancillary and other costsAncillary and other costs(138)(182)(37)(11)(2)— (7)(8)
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees$(917) $(485) $(420)Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(1,078)(1,283)(1,262)(1,393)(168)(187)(704)(767)
Net income$100
 $79
 $35
Net income (loss)Net income (loss)$1,760 $1,342 $41 $400 $50 $88 $(414)$274 
Adjusted EBITDA$592
 $293
 $66
Adjusted EBITDA$1,646 $1,307 $849 $925 $73 $63 $242 $308 
Production volumes (GWh)40,533
 14,605
 21,324
Production volumes (GWh):Production volumes (GWh):
Natural gas facilitiesNatural gas facilities35,093 39,433 55,938 55,555 5,284 5,228 
Lignite and coal facilitiesLignite and coal facilities26,013 24,558 29,971 34,424 
Nuclear facilitiesNuclear facilities19,480 19,305 
Solar/Battery facilitiesSolar/Battery facilities432 439 
Capacity factors:     Capacity factors:
CCGT facilities67.8% 48.2% —%CCGT facilities49.2 %55.0 %57.9 %58.4 %59.1 %58.5 %
Coal facilities63.2% —% 63.3%
Lignite and coal facilitiesLignite and coal facilities77.1 %72.8 %47.1 %54.1 %
Nuclear facilitiesNuclear facilities96.7 %95.8 %
Weather - percent of normal (a):     Weather - percent of normal (a):
Cooling degree days121.0% 118.0% 134.0%Cooling degree days98 %99 %105 %103 %130 %104 %102 %110 %
Heating degree days101.0% 102.0% 95.0%Heating degree days85 %111 %92 %101 %95 %105 %89 %99 %
Average Market On-Peak Power Prices ($/MWh) (b):     
PJM West$41.79
    
AD Hub$40.47
    
New York - Zone C  $37.03
  
Mass Hub  $50.11
  
Average natural gas price - TetcoM3 ($/MMBtu) (c)$3.69
    
Average natural gas price - Algonquin Citygates ($/MMBtu) (c)  $4.84
  
____________
(a)Reflects cooling degree days or heating degree days for the region based on Weather Services International (WSI) data. For


72
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2020201920202019
Market pricingAverage Market On-Peak Power Prices ($MWh) (b):
Average ERCOT North power price ($/MWh)$21.46 $35.93 PJM West Hub$24.55 $30.87 
AEP Dayton Hub$24.49 $31.02 
Average NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas price ($/MMBtu)$1.99 $2.51 NYISO Zone C$19.37 $25.90 
Massachusetts Hub$26.57 $34.89 
Average natural gas price (a):Indiana Hub$26.77 $31.23 
TetcoM3 ($/MMBtu)$1.59 $2.39 Northern Illinois Hub$22.47 $28.16 
Algonquin Citygates ($/MMBtu)$2.00 $3.17 
____________
(a)Reflects the year ended December 31, 2018, represents April 9, 2018 through December 31, 2018 only.average of daily quoted prices for the periods presented and does not reflect costs incurred by us.
(b)Reflects the average of day-ahead quoted prices for the periods presented and does not necessarily reflect prices we realized. For

The following table presents changes in net income (loss) and Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2018, represents April 9, 2018 through2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018 only.2019.
(c)
Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to 2019
TexasEastWestSunset
Favorable/(unfavorable) change in revenue net of fuel$390 $(35)$18 $(39)
Favorable/(unfavorable) change in other operating costs(20)(15)(3)(4)
Favorable/(unfavorable) change in SG&A expenses(7)(7)(6)(22)
Other(24)(19)1 (1)
Change in Adjusted EBITDA$339 $(76)$10 $(66)
Unfavorable change in depreciation and amortization(5)(41)— (13)
Change in unrealized net gains/(losses) on commodity hedging activities100 (211)(51)(241)
Fresh start/purchase accounting impacts4 (18)(4)(5)
Transition and merger expenses9 8 1 22 
Impairment of long-lived assets— — — (356)
Generation plant retirement expenses— — — (31)
Loss on disposal of investment in NELP— (29)— — 
Other (including interest and COVID-19 related expenses)(29)8 6 2 
Change in Net income$418 $(359)$(38)$(688)

The change in Texas segment results was driven by higher realized prices through hedging activities and plant optimization efforts and unrealized hedging gains, partially offset by lower insurance reimbursement and COVID-19 related expenses in the current year.

The change in East segment results was driven by lower capacity revenue, unrealized hedging losses in current year versus unrealized hedging gains in prior year, loss on disposal of equity method investment in NELP for 100% ownership of NJEA (see Note 21 to the Financial Statements) and COVID-19 related expenses in the current year.

The change in West segment results was driven by unrealized hedging losses in current year versus unrealized hedging gains in prior year, partially offset by higher realized prices through hedging activities and plant optimization efforts.

The change in Sunset segment results was driven by impairment of assets related to our Kincaid, Zimmer and Joppa/EEI coal generation facilities and related generation plant retirement expenses, unrealized hedging losses in current year versus unrealized hedging gains in prior year, lower capacity revenue, and higher operating costs.

73
Table of Contents
Generation — Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018

Year Ended December 31,
TexasEastWestSunset
20192018201920182019201820192018
Operating revenues:
Electricity sales$1,048 $1,162 $1,355 $990 $293 $193 $969 $769 
Capacity revenue from ISO/RTO— — 170 375 — 30 197 258 
Sales to affiliates2,213 1,819 1,074 614 — — 285 168 
Rolloff of unrealized net gains (losses) representing positions settled in the current period371 404 59 3 (10)20 (74)60 
Unrealized net gains (losses) on hedging activities72 (689)(44)(43)51 (35)249 (87)
Unrealized net gains (losses) on hedging activities with affiliates132 (198)180 (36)— — (7)16 
Other revenues— (1)(4)(8)4 — (17)(1)
Operating revenues3,836 2,497 2,790 1,895 338 208 1,602 1,183 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees:
Fuel for generation facilities and purchased power costs(1,117)(1,307)(1,381)(1,111)(187)(132)(739)(547)
Fuel for generation facilities and purchased power costs from affiliates— — (2)(8)— — 2 30 
Unrealized (gains) losses from hedging activities16 (15)1 (5)— — (22)19 
Ancillary and other costs(182)(139)(11)(7)— (2)(8)(7)
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(1,283)(1,461)(1,393)(1,131)(187)(134)(767)(505)
Net income (loss)$1,342 $(88)$400 $18 $88 $34 $274 $242 
Adjusted EBITDA$1,307 $912 $925 $680 $63 $65 $308 $341 
Production volumes (GWh):
Natural gas facilities39,433 35,790 55,555 41,036 5,228 3,664 
Lignite and coal facilities24,558 26,243 34,424 29,734 
Nuclear facilities19,305 20,416 
Solar/Battery facilities439 344 
Capacity factors:
CCGT facilities55.0 %58.8 %58.4 %59.1 %58.5 %56.1 %
Lignite and coal facilities72.8 %77.8 %54.1 %63.4 %
Nuclear facilities95.8 %101.3 %
Weather - percent of normal (a):
Cooling degree days99 %100 %103 %120 %105 %105 %110 %134 %
Heating degree days111 %113 %101 %103 %105 %86 %99 %97 %
____________
(a)Reflects cooling degree days or heating degree days for the region based on Weather Services International (WSI) data.


74
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2019201820192018
Market pricingAverage Market On-Peak Power Prices ($MWh) (b):
Average ERCOT North power price ($/MWh)$35.93 $29.96 PJM West Hub$30.87 $41.79 
AEP Dayton Hub$31.02 $40.47 
Average NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas price ($/MMBtu)$2.51 $3.12 NYISO Zone C$25.90 $37.03 
Massachusetts Hub$34.89 $50.11 
Average natural gas price (a):Indiana Hub$31.23 $39.01 
TetcoM3 ($/MMBtu)$2.39 $3.69 Northern Illinois Hub$28.16 $34.46 
Algonquin Citygates ($/MMBtu)$3.17 $4.84 
____________
(a)Reflects the average of daily quoted prices for the periods presented and does not reflect costs incurred by us. For
(b)Reflects the average of day-ahead quoted prices for the periods presented and does not necessarily reflect prices we realized.

The following table presents changes in net income and Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2018, represents April 9, 2018 through December 31, 2018 only.


Net income totaled $100 million, $79 million and $35 million and Adjusted EBITDA totaled $592 million, $293 million and $66 million in2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018.
Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to 2018
TexasEastWestSunset
Favorable impact related to operations acquired in the Merger (a)$— $268 $20 $84 
Favorable/(unfavorable) change in revenue net of fuel421 10 (11)(159)
Favorable/(unfavorable) change in other operating costs(28)(13)(4)41 
Favorable/(unfavorable) change in SG&A expenses9 (11)(7)1 
Other(7)(9)— — 
Change in Adjusted EBITDA$395 $245 $(2)$(33)
Unfavorable change in depreciation and amortization(77)(161)(5)(39)
Change in unrealized net gains on commodity hedging activities1,089 277 56 138 
Fresh start/purchase accounting impacts— 7 4 (7)
Transition and merger expenses(2)7 — (13)
Generation plant retirement expenses— — — (12)
Impact of Odessa earnout buybacks18 — — — 
Other (including interest)7 7 1 (2)
Change in Net income$1,430 $382 $54 $32 

The change in Texas segment results was driven by higher realized prices through hedging activities and plant optimization efforts, unrealized gains in 2019 versus unrealized losses in 2018, for PJM, NY/NEinsurance reimbursement received in 2019, and MISO segments respectively.the Odessa earnout buybacks in 2018.

The change in East segment results was driven by operations in the first quarter of 2019 acquired in the Merger, partially offset by lower generation in the second through fourth quarters.

The change in West segment results was driven by operations in the first quarter of 2019 acquired in the Merger and unrealized hedging gains in 2019 versus unrealized hedging losses in 2018.

The change in Sunset segment results was driven by operations in the first quarter of 2019 acquired in the Merger and unrealized hedging gains in 2019, partially offset by decrease in revenue net of fuel reflecting lower realized power prices and capacity revenue.
75
Table of Contents
 PJM NY/NE MISO
Generation revenue net of fuel$481
 $116
 $229
Capacity revenue369
 260
 61
Operating costs(243) (74) (202)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(52) (37) (52)
Equity income from unconsolidated investment and other7
 11
 —
Other30
 17
 30
Adjusted EBITDA$592
 $293
 $66
Depreciation and amortization(413) (152) (9)
Unrealized net gains (losses) on hedging activities(42) (40) 9
Purchase accounting impacts1
 (9) (12)
Transition and merger expenses(14) (2) (9)
Other(24) (11) (10)
Net income$100
 $79
 $35

Asset Closure Segment — Year Ended December 31, 20182020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20172019

Year Ended December 31, 
Favorable (Unfavorable)
Change
Year Ended December 31,Favorable (Unfavorable)
Change
2018 2017 20202019
Operating revenues$50
 $964
 $(914)Operating revenues$3 $341 $(338)
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(40) (607) 567
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees— (267)267 
Operating costs(43) (380) 337
Operating costs(63)(138)75 
Depreciation and amortization—
 (1) 1
Depreciation and amortization(22)— (22)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(17) (19) 2
Selling, general and administrative expenses(27)(43)16 
Impairment of long-lived assets—
 (25) 25
Operating income (loss)(50) (68) 18
Operating lossOperating loss(109)(107)(2)
Other income2
 6
 (4)Other income10 3 7 
Other deductions(1) (1) —
Other deductions(2)(5)3 
Income (loss) before income taxes(49) (63) 14
Income tax expense—
 —
 —
Net income (loss)$(49) $(63) $14
Depreciation and amortization—
 1
 (1)
EBITDA(49) (62) 13
Generation plant retirement expenses—
 206
 (206)
Fresh start accounting impacts1
 14
 (13)
Transition and merger expenses2
 —
 2
Other(3) ���
 (3)
Net lossNet loss$(101)$(109)$8 
Adjusted EBITDA$(49) $158
 $(207)Adjusted EBITDA$(81)$(68)$(13)
Production volumes (GWh)1,159
 25,392
 (24,233)Production volumes (GWh)— 7,484 (7,484)


Results for the Asset Closure segment primarily reflect the retirement of the Coffeen, Duck Creek, Havana and Hennepin plants in November and December 2019, respectively, the retirement of the Northeastern waste coal plant in October 2018, retirement of the Stuart and Killen plants in May 2018 (acquired in the Merger), retirement of the Northeastern waste coal plant in October 2018 and the retirement of the Monticello, Sandow and Big Brown plants in January and February 2018, respectively (see Note 4 to the Financial Statements) and corresponding 95% decrease in volume in the year ended December 31, 2018.. Operating costs for the yearyears ended December 31, 20182020 and 2019 included ongoing costs associated with closing thesethe decommissioning and reclamation of retired plants as well as a favorable adjustment to the estimated asset retirement obligation of $56 million.and mines.


Predecessor Consolidated Financial Results — Period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016
 Predecessor
 Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016
Operating revenues$3,973
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(2,082)
Net gain from commodity hedging and trading activities282
Operating costs(664)
Depreciation and amortization(459)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(482)
Operating income (loss)568
Other income19
Other deductions(75)
Interest expense and related charges(1,049)
Reorganization items22,121
Income (loss) before income taxes21,584
Income tax benefit1,267
Net income (loss)$22,851


Predecessor Operating Statistics — Period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016
 Predecessor
 Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016
Operating revenues: 
Retail electricity revenues$3,154
Wholesale electricity revenues and other operating revenues (a)(b)819
Total operating revenues$3,973
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees: 
Fuel for generation facilities and purchased power costs (a)$950
Other costs108
Delivery fees1,024
Total$2,082
Sales volumes (GWh): 
Retail electricity sales volumes30,973
Wholesale electricity sales volumes (b)25,563
Production volumes (GWh): 
Nuclear facilities15,005
Lignite and coal facilities (c)31,865
Natural gas facilities8,539
Capacity factors: 
Nuclear facilities99.2%
Lignite and coal facilities (c)60.5%
CCGT facilities65.2%
Market pricing: 
Average ERCOT North power price ($/MWh)$20.78
Weather (North Texas average) - percent of normal (d): 
Cooling degree days102.8%
Heating degree days81.9%
____________
(a)Upon settlement, physical derivative commodity contracts that we mark-to-market in net income, such as certain electricity sales and purchase agreements and coal purchase contracts, wholesale electricity revenues and fuel and purchased power costs are reported at approximated market prices, as required by accounting rules, rather than contract price. The offsetting differences between contract and market prices are reported in net gain from commodity hedging and trading activities.
(b)Includes net amounts related to sales and purchases of balancing energy in the ERCOT real-time market.
(c)Includes the estimated effects of economic backdown (including seasonal operations) of lignite/coal-fueled units totaling 14,420 GWh for the period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016.
(d)Weather data is obtained from Weatherbank, Inc., an independent company that collects and archives weather data from reporting stations of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (a federal agency under the U.S. Department of Commerce). Normal is defined as the average over the 10-year period from 2000 to 2010.


Predecessor Financial Results — Period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016

For the period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016, income before income taxes totaled $21.584 billion and included a $24.252 billion gain on reorganization adjustments and a $2.013 billion loss for the net impacts from the adoption of fresh start reporting (see Notes 5 and 7 to the Financial Statements). Results also reflected the effect of declining average electricity prices on operating revenues, $977 million in adequate protection interest expense paid/accrued on pre-petition debt and $116 million in reorganization items associated with the Chapter 11 Cases.

Operating revenues totaled $3.973 billion for the period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016. Retail electricity revenues totaled $3.154 billion and were negatively impacted by declining average prices and reduced volumes reflecting milder than normal weather in 2016. Wholesale revenues totaled $649 million and were positively impacted by increases in generation volumes (approximately 8,048 GWh) driven by the Lamar and Forney generation assets acquired in April 2016 (see Note 3 to the Financial Statements), partially offset by lower average wholesale electricity prices.

Following is an analysis of amounts reported as net losses from commodity hedging and trading activities. Results are primarily related to natural gas and power hedging activity.
 Predecessor
 Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016
Realized net gains$320
Unrealized net gains (losses)(38)
Total$282

The negative impacts of declining average prices on wholesale operating revenues were partially offset by realized net gains reflecting settled gains on derivatives due to declining market prices. These gains were primarily related to natural gas positions.

For the period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016, net unrealized losses were primarily impacted by reversals of previously recorded unrealized net gains on settled positions.

Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees totaled $2.082 billion for the period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016 reflecting the impact of declining electricity prices on purchased power costs during 2016, partially offset by incremental natural gas fuel costs associated with the Lamar and Forney Acquisition.

Operating costs totaled $664 million for the period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016 and primarily reflect maintenance expense for generation assets, including the scope and timing of maintenance costs at lignite/coal-fueled generation facilities. Operating costs were also impacted by incremental operation and maintenance costs associated with the Lamar and Forney Acquisition.

Depreciation and amortization expenses totaled $459 million for the period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016 and primarily reflected depreciation on power generation and mining property, plant and equipment and amortization of identifiable intangible assets. Depreciation and amortization expenses were also impacted by incremental depreciation expense associated with the Lamar and Forney Acquisition.

SG&A expenses totaled $482 million for the period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016 and reflected administrative and general salaries, employee benefits, marketing costs related to retail electricity activity and other administrative costs.

Results also include $32 million of severance expense, primarily reported in fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees and operating costs, associated with certain actions taken to reduce costs related to mining and lignite/coal generation operations.

For the period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016, interest expense and related charges totaled $1.049 billion and included adequate protection payments approved by the Bankruptcy Court for the benefit of TCEH secured creditors totaling $977 million and interest expense on debtor-in-possession financing totaling $76 million.



Energy-Related Commodity Contracts and Mark-to-Market Activities


The table below summarizes the changes in commodity contract assets and liabilities for the periods presented.years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. The net change in these assets and liabilities, excluding "other activity" as described below, reflects $380 million, $145 million, $166$231 million and $38$696 million in unrealized net losses for the Successor periodgains for the year ended December 31, 20182020 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016,2019, respectively, all arising from mark-to-market accounting for positions in the commodity contract portfolio.
Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Commodity contract net liability at beginning of period$(279)$(850)
Settlements/termination of positions (a)(14)358 
Changes in fair value of positions in the portfolio (b)245 338 
Acquired commodity contracts (c)— (28)
Other activity (d)(27)(97)
Commodity contract net liability at end of period$(75)$(279)
____________
(a)Represents reversals of previously recognized unrealized gains and losses upon settlement/termination (offsets realized gains and losses recognized in the settlement period). The years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 include reversals of $1 million of previously recorded unrealized losses and $3 million of previously recorded unrealized gains related to Vistra beginning balances. respectively. The years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 also include reversals of $12 million and $124 million, respectively, of previously recorded unrealized losses related to commodity contracts acquired in the Merger, Crius Transaction and Ambit Transaction. Excludes changes in fair value in the month the position settled as well as amounts related to positions entered into, and settled, in the same month.
(b)Represents unrealized net gains (losses) recognized, reflecting the effect of changes in fair value. Excludes changes in fair value in the month the position settled as well as amounts related to positions entered into, and settled, in the same month.
(c)Includes fair value of commodity contracts acquired on the Ambit Acquisition Date and the Crius Acquisition Date in 2019 (see Note 2 to the Financial Statements).
(d)Represents changes in fair value of positions due to receipt or payment of cash not reflected in unrealized gains or losses. Amounts are generally related to premiums related to options purchased or sold as well as certain margin deposits classified as settlement for certain transactions executed on the CME.

76
Table of Contents
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended
December 31, 2018		 Year Ended
December 31, 2017		 Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016		  Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016
Commodity contract net asset (liability) at beginning of period$(96) $64
 $181
  $271
Settlements/termination of positions (a)457
 (207) (95)  (232)
Changes in fair value of positions in the portfolio (b)(837) 62
 (71)  194
Acquired commodity contracts in Merger (c)(454) —
 —
  —
Other activity (d)80
 (15) 49
  (35)
Commodity contract net asset (liability) at end of period$(850) $(96) $64
  $198

(a)Represents reversals of previously recognized unrealized gains and losses upon settlement/termination (offsets realized gains and losses recognized in the settlement period). The years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 include reversals of $17 million and $63 million, respectively of previously recorded unrealized gains related to Vistra Energy beginning balances. The year ended December 31, 2018 also includes reversal of $320 million of previously recorded unrealized losses related to commodity contracts acquired in the Merger. Excludes changes in fair value in the month the position settled as well as amounts related to positions entered into, and settled, in the same month.
(b)Represents unrealized net gains (losses) recognized, reflecting the effect of changes in fair value. Excludes changes in fair value in the month the position settled as well as amounts related to positions entered into, and settled, in the same month.
(c)Includes fair value of commodity contracts acquired at the Merger Date (see Note 2 to the Financial Statements).
(d)Represents changes in fair value of positions due to receipt or payment of cash not reflected in unrealized gains or losses. Amounts are generally related to premiums related to options purchased or sold as well as certain margin deposits classified as settlement for certain transactions executed on the CME.

Maturity Table — The following table presents the net commodity contract liability arising from recognition of fair values at December 31, 2018,2020, scheduled by the source of fair value and contractual settlement dates of the underlying positions.
Maturity dates of unrealized commodity contract net liability at December 31, 2020
Source of fair valueLess than
1 year		1-3 years4-5 yearsExcess of
5 years		Total
Prices actively quoted$(41)$(80)$(5)$— $(126)
Prices provided by other external sources30 (2)1 — 29 
Prices based on models107 23 (43)(65)22 
Total$96 $(59)$(47)$(65)$(75)
  Successor
  Maturity dates of unrealized commodity contract net liability at December 31, 2018
Source of fair value 
Less than
1 year
 1-3 years 4-5 years 
Excess of
5 years
 Total
Prices actively quoted $(106) $5
 $—
 $—
 $(101)
Prices provided by other external sources (507) (107) —
 —
 (614)
Prices based on models (59) (64) (12) —
 (135)
Total $(672) $(166) $(12) $—
 $(850)




FINANCIAL CONDITION


Operating Cash Flows


Successor— Year Ended December 31, 20182020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20172019 —Cash provided by operating activities totaled $1.471$3.337 billion and $1.386$2.736 billion in the years ended December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively. The favorable change of $85$601 million was primarily driven by increasedreflects the strong operating performance of both the Texas and Retail segments. Additionally, the increase in operating cash from operations reflecting operations acquiredflows includes a lower increase in the Merger largely offset by increasedworking capital, lower cash interest paid of $406 million due to the assumption of long-term debt obligations in the Merger,and increased income taxes received, partially offset by an increase in cash used for margin deposits of $367 million related to derivative contracts and $238 million in proceeds received in 2017 from the Alcoa contract settlement.posted with third-parties.


Period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 — Cash provided by operating activities totaled $81 million and was primarily driven by cash earnings from our business of approximately $251 million after taking into consideration depreciation and amortization and unrealized mark-to-market losses on derivatives, offset by a net use of cash of approximately $170 million in working capital primarily driven by cash utilized in margin postings related to derivative contracts.

Depreciation and Amortizationamortization — Depreciation and amortization expense reported as a reconciling adjustment in the consolidated statements of consolidated cash flows exceeds the amount reported in the consolidated statements of consolidated income (loss)operations by $139$311 million, $136$236 million and $69$139 million for the year ended December 31, 20182020, 2019 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016,2018, respectively. The difference represented amortization of nuclear fuel, which is reported as fuel costs in the consolidated statements of consolidated income (loss)operations consistent with industry practice, and amortization of intangible net assets and liabilities that are reported in various other consolidated statements of consolidated income (loss)operations line items including operating revenues and fuel and purchased power costs and delivery fees.


Predecessor— Period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016Investing Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019 — Cash used in operatinginvesting activities totaled $238$1,572 million and was primarily driven by$1.717 billion in the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Capital expenditures totaled $1.259 billion and $713 million in the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Cash used in investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 also reflected net purchases of environmental allowances of $339 million and $125 million, respectively. Cash used in investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2019 also reflected $880 million of net cash used for margin deposit postingspaid in the Crius and other workingAmbit Transactions.

Capital Expenditures — In the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, capital utilization.expenditures consisted of:

Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Capital expenditures, including LTSA prepayments$770 $520 
Nuclear fuel purchases88 89 
Growth and development expenditures401 104 
Capital expenditures1,259 $713 

77
Table of Contents
Financing Cash Flows


Successor— Year Ended December 31, 20182020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019 — Cash used in financing activities totaled $2.723$1.796 billion and reflected:

cash tender offers to purchase $1.542$1.237 billion of senior notes assumed in the Merger;years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The change was primarily driven by:
the amendment to the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, including the repayment
•issuance of $500 million in borrowings under the Term C Facility;
the redemption of $850 million$5.7 billion principal amount of outstanding 6.75% Senior NotesVistra Operations senior secured and unsecured notes in May 2018;2019;
the repurchases•redemption of $119$747 million principal amount of outstanding Vistra EnergyUnsecured Senior Notes in 2020;
•net repayments of $350 million in short-term borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility in 2020 compared to $350 million in net short-term borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility in 2019;
•net repayments of $150 million under the Receivables Facility in 2020 compared to net borrowings of $111 million in 2019; and
•repayment of $100 million of term loans under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities in 2020,

partially offset by:

•cash tender offers and early redemptions to purchase approximately $3.0 billion of senior unsecured notes assumed in Novemberthe Merger in 2019;
•repayment of approximately $3.1 billion of term loans under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities in 2019;
•$656 million in cash paid for share repurchases in in 2019; and December 2018;
premium amounts paid•$186 million decrease in connection with the debt tender offer and other debt financing fees totaling $236 million, andin 2020 compared to 2019.
$763 million of cash paid for share repurchases during 2018,

Debt Activity
partially offset by:

the issuance of $1.0 billion principal amount of Vistra Operations 5.500% senior notes due 2026, and
proceeds of $339 million from the accounts receivable securitization program.

Year Ended December 31, 2017 — Cash used in financing activities totaled $201 million and reflected the repayment of debt, including the repayment of $150 million in principal under the Term Loan C Facility (seeSee Note 1410 to the Financial Statements).

Period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 — Cash provided by financing activities totaled $6 million and related to the net impactsstatements for details of the Incremental Term Loan B borrowingsReceivables Facility and the Special Dividend paid to shareholders.

Predecessor— Period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016 — Cash provided by financing activities totaled $1.059 billionRepurchase Facility and primarily reflected $2.040 billion in net borrowings under the DIP Roll Facilities and the DIP Facility, including $870 million in net borrowings to fund the Lamar and Forney Acquisition (see Note 3 to the Financial Statements), and $69 million from the issuance of preferred stock, partially offset by $915 million in payments to extinguish claims under the Plan of Reorganization and $112 million in fees related to the issuance of the DIP Roll Facilities.


Investing Cash Flows

Successor— Year Ended December 31, 2018 — Cash used in investing activities totaled $101 million and reflected capital expenditures (including LTSA prepayments and nuclear fuel purchases) totaling $496 million and development and growth expenditures totaling $34 million, partially offset by $445 million of cash acquired in the Merger.

Capital expenditures, including nuclear fuel, in the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled $496 million and consisted of:

$208 million primarily for our generation and mining operations;
$118 million for nuclear fuel purchases;
$70 million for information technology, other corporate investments and Comanche Peak repairs, and
$100 million for LTSA prepayments.

Year Ended December 31, 2017 — Cash used in investing activities totaled $727 million and was primarily driven by payments of $355 million related to the Odessa Acquisition, Upton 2 solar development expenditures totaling $190 million and capital expenditures (including nuclear fuel purchases) totaling $176 million. The Odessa Acquisition and the Upton 2 solar development were funded using cash on hand.

Capital expenditures, including nuclear fuel, in the year ended December 31, 2017 totaled $176 million and consisted of:

$88 million primarily for our generation and mining operations;
$62 million for nuclear fuel purchases, and
$26 million for information technology and other corporate investments.

Period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 — Cash used in investing activities totaled $93 million and was primarily driven by capital expenditures (including nuclear fuel purchases) totaling $89 million.

Capital expenditures, including nuclear fuel, in the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 totaled $89 million and consisted of:

$40 million primarily for our generation and mining operations;
$41 million for nuclear fuel purchases, and
$8 million for information technology and other corporate investments.

Predecessor— Period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016 — Cash used in investing activities totaled $1.420 billion and was primarily driven by payments of $1.343 billion related to the Lamar and Forney Acquisition net of cash acquired (see Note 3 to the Financial Statements) and capital expenditures (including nuclear fuel purchases) totaling $263 million.

Capital expenditures, including nuclear fuel, in the period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016 totaled $263 million and consisted of:

$211 million primarily for our generation and mining operations;
$33 million for nuclear fuel purchases, and
$19 million for information technology and other corporate investments.

Debt Activity

See Note 1411 to the Financial Statements for details of the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and other long-term debt.



Available Liquidity


The following table summarizes changes in available liquidity for the year ended December 31, 2018:2020:
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019Change
Cash and cash equivalents$406 $300 $106 
Vistra Operations Credit Facilities — Revolving Credit Facility1,988 1,426 562 
Vistra Operations — Alternate Letter of Credit Facility5 — 5 
Total available liquidity (a)$2,399 $1,726 $673 
 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Change
Cash and cash equivalents (a)$636
 $1,487
 $(851)
Vistra Operations Credit Facilities — Revolving Credit Facility1,135
 834
 301
Vistra Operations Credit Facilities — Term Loan C Facility (b)—
 7
 (7)
Total available liquidity$1,771
 $2,328
 $(557)
____________
___________(a)Excludes amounts available to be borrowed under the Receivables Facility and the Repurchase Facility, respectively. See Note 10 to the Financial Statements for detail on our account receivable financing.
(a)Cash and cash equivalents excludes $500 million of restricted cash held for letter of credit support at December 31, 2017 (see Note 23 to the Financial Statements).
(b)The Term Loan C Facility was used for issuing letters of credit for general corporate purposes. Borrowings totaling $500 million were held in collateral accounts at December 31, 2017, and were reported as restricted cash in our consolidated balance sheets. In June 2018, the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities were amended, and the Term Loan C Facility was repaid using $500 million of cash from the collateral accounts used to backstop letters of credit.


The decrease$673 million increase in available liquidity of $557 million infor the year ended December 31, 20182020 was primarily driven by cash tender offers to purchase $1.542from operations, repayments of cash borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and a reduction of letters of credit outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility reflecting the issuance of $303 million of letters of credit under the Secured LOC Facilities, partially offset by $1.259 billion of senior notes assumed in the Merger, the redemption of $850 million principal amount of outstanding 6.75% senior notes, the amendment to the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, the repurchases of $119capital expenditures (including LTSA prepayments, nuclear fuel and development and growth expenditures), $747 million principal amount of outstanding Vistra Energy senior notes and $763Unsecured Senior Notes redeemed in 2020, $266 million in cashdividends paid for share repurchases, partially offset byto stockholders, the issuancematurity of $1.0 billion principala $250 million Alternate LOC Facility and $100 million of term loans under the Vistra Operation Credit Facility repaid in March 2020.

During the winter storm Uri event, Vistra was required to post a significant amount of collateral, including to ERCOT, clearinghouses for natural gas and power transactions and other trading counterparties. Despite these posting requirements, Vistra Operations 5.500% senior notes, $445 millionhas consistently maintained, and it continues to maintain, sufficient liquidity to conduct its operations in the ordinary course. As of February 25, 2021, Vistra had more than $1.5 billion of cash acquired in the Merger, increased available capacityand availability under its revolving credit facility to meet any of its liquidity needs. In February 2021, we borrowed $600 million under the Revolving Credit Facility and proceedsto fund our general corporate needs, including posting requirements in connection with the expected impacts of $339 million from the accounts receivable securitization program.winter storm Uri.


Based upon our current internal financial forecasts, we believe that we will have sufficient liquidity to fund our anticipated cash requirements, including those related to our capital allocation initiatives, through at least the next 12 months. Our operational cash flows tend to be seasonal and weighted toward the second half of the year.


78
Table of Contents
Capital Expenditures


Estimated capital expenditures and nuclear fuel purchases for 20192021 are expected to total approximately $629 million$1.379 billion and include:


•$432575 million for investments in generation and mining facilities;
•$74108 million for nuclear fuel purchases;
•$809 million for information technology and other corporate investments,investments; and
•$43687 million for growth and development.development expenditures.


Liquidity Effects of Commodity Hedging and Trading Activities


We have entered into commodity hedging and trading transactions that require us to post collateral if the forward price of the underlying commodity moves such that the hedging or trading instrument we hold has declined in value. We use cash, letters of credit and other forms of credit support to satisfy such collateral posting obligations. See Note 1411 to the Financial Statements for discussion of the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities.


Exchange cleared transactions typically require initial margin (i.e., the upfront cash and/or letter of credit posted to take into account the size and maturity of the positions and credit quality) in addition to variation margin (i.e., the daily cash margin posted to take into account changes in the value of the underlying commodity). The amount of initial margin required is generally defined by exchange rules. Clearing agents, however, typically have the right to request additional initial margin based on various factors, including market depth, volatility and credit quality, which may be in the form of cash, letters of credit, a guaranty or other forms as negotiated with the clearing agent. Cash collateral received from counterparties is either used for working capital and other business purposes, including reducing borrowings under credit facilities, or is required to be deposited in a separate account and restricted from being used for working capital and other corporate purposes. With respect to over-the-counter transactions, counterparties generally have the right to substitute letters of credit for such cash collateral. In such event, the cash collateral previously posted would be returned to such counterparties, which would reduce liquidity in the event the cash was not restricted.



At December 31, 2018,2020, we received or posted cash and letters of credit for commodity hedging and trading activities as follows:


•$361257 million in cash has been posted with counterparties as compared to $30$202 million posted at December 31, 2017;2019;
•$433 million in cash has been received from counterparties as compared to $4$8 million received at December 31, 2017;2019;
•$1.185 billion878 million in letters of credit have been posted with counterparties as compared to $390 million$1.150 billion posted at December 31, 2017,2019; and
•$1218 million in letters of credit have been received from counterparties as compared to $3$17 million received at December 31, 2017.2019.


Income Tax Payments


In the next 12 months, we do not expect to make federal income tax payments due to Vistra Energy's forecasted loss position. In February 2019, we received a refundVistra's use of $21 million related to Vistra Energy's 2017 federal tax return.NOL carryforwards. We expect to make approximately $56 million in state income tax payments, of approximately $30offset by $9 million in state tax refunds, and $3 million in TRA payments in the next 12 months.

For the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, we received refunds of $170 million related to AMT credits. For the year ended December 31, 2020, there were no federal income tax payments, totaled $45$40 million in state income tax payments, totaled $22$10 million in state income tax refunds and less than $1 million in TRA payments totaled $16 million.payments.


Capitalization


Our capitalization ratios consisted of 58%52% and 41%56% long-term debt (less amounts due currently) and 42%48% and 59% shareholders'44% stockholders' equity at December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively. Total long-term debt (including amounts due currently) to capitalization was 58%53% and 41%57% at December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, respectively.


79
Table of Contents
Financial Covenants


The Credit Facilities Agreement includes a covenant, solely with respect to the Revolving Credit Facility and solely during a compliance period (which, in general, is applicable when the aggregate revolving borrowings and issued revolving letters of credit (in excess of $300 million) exceed 30% of the revolving commitments), that requires the consolidated first lienfirst-lien net leverage ratio not exceed 4.25 to 1.00. As ofAlthough the period ended December 31, 2018,2020 was not a compliance period, we werewould have been in compliance with this financial covenant.covenant if it was required to be tested at such date.


See Note 1411 to the Financial Statements for discussion of other covenants related to the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities.


Collateral Support Obligations


The RCT has rules in place to assure that parties can meet their mining reclamation obligations. In September 2016, the RCT agreed to a collateral bond of up to $975 million to support Luminant's reclamation obligations. The collateral bond is effectively a first lien on all of Vistra Operations' assets (which ranks pari passu with the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities) that contractually enables the RCT to be paid (up to $975 million) before the other first lienfirst-lien lenders in the event of a liquidation of our assets. Collateral support relates to land mined or being mined and not yet reclaimed as well as land for which permits have been obtained but mining activities have not yet begun and land already reclaimed but not released from regulatory obligations by the RCT, and includes cost contingency amounts.


The PUCT has rules in place to assure adequate creditworthiness of each REP, including the ability to return customer deposits, if necessary. Under these rules, at December 31, 2018,2020, Vistra Energy has posted letters of credit in the amount of $55$102 million with the PUCT, which is subject to adjustments.


The RTOs/ISOsISOs/RTOs we operate in have rules in place to assure adequate creditworthiness of parties that participate in the markets operated by those RTOs/ISOs.ISOs/RTOs. Under these rules, Vistra Energy has posted collateral support totaling $181$290 million in the form of letters of credit, $10 million in the form of a surety bond and $1 million inof cash at December 31, 20182020 (which is subject to daily adjustments based on settlement activity with the RTOs/ISOs)ISOs/RTOs).


Material Cross Default/Cross-Default/Acceleration Provisions


Certain of our contractual arrangements contain provisions that could result in an event of default if there was a failure under financing arrangements to meet payment terms or to observe covenants that could result in an acceleration of payments due. Such provisions are referred to as "cross default""cross-default" or "cross acceleration""cross-acceleration" provisions.



A default by Vistra Operations or any of its restricted subsidiaries in respect of certain specified indebtedness in an aggregate amount in excess of $300 million may result in a cross default under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities. Such a default would allow the lenders to accelerate the maturity of outstanding balances (approximately $5.8$2.57 billion at December 31, 2018)2020) under such facilities.


Each of Vistra Operations' (or its subsidiaries') commodity hedging agreements and interest rate swap agreements that are secured with a lien on its assets on a pari passu basis with the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities lenders contains a cross defaultcross-default provision. An event of a default by Vistra Operations or any of its subsidiaries relating to indebtedness equal to or above a threshold defined in excess of $300 millionthe applicable agreement that results in the acceleration of such debt, would give eachsuch counterparty under these hedging agreements the right to terminate its hedge or interest rate swap agreement with Vistra Operations (or its applicable subsidiary) and require all outstanding obligations under such agreement to be settled.


Under the Vistra Operations' senior notes indenture,Operations Senior Unsecured Indentures and the Vistra Operations Senior Secured Indenture, a default under any document evidencing indebtedness for borrowed money by Vistra Operations or any subsidiary guarantorGuarantor Subsidiary for failure to pay principal when due at final maturity or that results in the acceleration of such indebtedness in an aggregate amount of $300 million or more may result in a cross default under the senior notes.

Each of Vistra Energy's indenturesOperations Senior Unsecured Notes, the Senior Secured Notes, the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, the Receivables Facility, the Alternate LOC Facilities, and other current or future documents evidencing any indebtedness for each series of senior notes (except with respect toborrowed money by the Consent Senior Notes)applicable borrower or issuer, as the case may be, and the TEUs, respectively, contain a cross default provision. A default by Vistra Energy, as issuer of each series of senior notes and the TEUs, respectively, in respect of certain specified indebtedness in an aggregate amount in excess of $100 million may result in a cross default under the respective indentures of the senior notes and TEUs. Such a default would allow the trustee or noteholders holding at least 25% in principal amount of the respective series of senior notes or TEUs that are outstanding (each such series treated as a separate class) to accelerate the maturity of such portion of the principal amount of all securities of such series of senior notes or TEUs, respectively.applicable Guarantor Subsidiaries party thereto.


Additionally, we enter into energy-related physical and financial contracts, the master forms of which contain provisions whereby an event of default or acceleration of settlement would occur if we were to default under an obligation in respect of borrowings in excess of thresholds, which may vary by contract.

80
Table of Contents

The Receivables ProgramFacility contains a cross defaultcross-default provision. The cross defaultcross-default provision applies, among other instances, if TXU Energy, Dynegy Energy Services, Ambit Texas, Value Based Brands and TriEagle, each indirect subsidiaries of Vistra Operations,and originators under the performance guarantor,Receivables Facility (Originators), fails to make a payment of principal or interest on any indebtedness that is outstanding in a principal amount of at least $300 million, or, in the case of TXU Energy or any of the originator and servicer,other Originators, in a principal amount of at least $50 million, after the expiration of any applicable grace period, or if other events occur or circumstances exist under such indebtedness which give rise to a right of the debtholder to accelerate such indebtedness, or if such indebtedness becomes due before its stated maturity. If this cross defaultcross-default provision is triggered, a termination event under the Receivables Facility would occur and the Receivables Facility may be terminated.


The Repurchase Facility contains a cross-default provision. The cross-default provision applies, among other instances, if an event of default (or similar event) occurs under the Receivables Facility or the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities. If this cross-default provision is triggered, a termination event under the Repurchase Facility would occur and the Repurchase Facility may be terminated.

Under the Vistra Operations' alternative letter of credit program,Alternate LOC Facilities, a default under any document evidencing indebtedness for borrowed money by Vistra Operations or any subsidiary guarantorGuarantor Subsidiary for failure to pay principal when due at final maturity or that results in the acceleration of such indebtedness in an aggregate amount of $300 million or more, may result in a termination of the facility.Alternate LOC Facilities.



Under the Secured LOC Facilities, a default under any document evidencing indebtedness for borrowed money by Vistra Operations or any Guarantor Subsidiary for failure to pay principal when due at final maturity or that results in the acceleration of such indebtedness in an aggregate amount of $300 million or more, may result in a termination of the Secured LOC Facilities.

Guarantor Summary Financial Information

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we fully redeemed the Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes that were previously guaranteed by substantially all of our wholly owned subsidiaries. The following tables summarize the combined financial information of (i) Vistra Corp. (Parent), which is the ultimate parent company and issuer of the Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes with effect as of the Merger Date, on a stand-alone, unconsolidated basis and (ii) the guarantor subsidiaries of Vistra (Guarantor Subsidiaries). The Guarantor Subsidiaries consist of the wholly owned subsidiaries, which jointly, severally, fully and unconditionally, guaranteed the payment obligations under the Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes. See Note 11 to the Financial Statements for discussion of the Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes and Note 14 to the Financial Statements for discussion of dividend restrictions of Vistra Operations (a guarantor subsidiary of Vistra) and Parent.

This financial information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Vistra. Transactions between the Parent and the Guarantor Subsidiaries have been eliminated. The inclusion of Vistra's subsidiaries as Guarantor Subsidiaries in the summary financial information is determined as of the most recent balance sheet date presented.

The Parent files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. All consolidated income tax expense or benefits and deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in the Guarantor summary financial information presented below, with no allocation made to the non-guarantor subsidiaries. Additionally, all corporate shared service costs are included in the Guarantor summary financial information with no allocation to the non-guarantor subsidiaries.
Year Ended
December 31, 2020
Revenues$10,954 
Operating income$1,592 
Net income$678 
Net income attributable to Vistra$678 

December 31, 2020December 31, 2020
Current assets$2,404 Current liabilities$1,828 
Noncurrent assets21,307 Noncurrent liabilities13,599 
Total assets$23,711 Total liabilities$15,427 
Noncontrolling interest$— 
81
Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations and Commitments


The following table summarizes the amounts and related maturities of our contractual cash obligations at December 31, 2018. See Notes 14 and 15Note 11 to the Financial Statements for additional disclosures regarding debts and noncancellable purchase obligations.
Contractual Cash Obligations:
Less Than
One Year
 
One to
Three
Years
 
Three to
Five
Years
 
More
Than Five
Years
 Total
Debt – principal, including capital leases (a)$191
 $334
 $5,932
 $4,453
 $10,910
Debt – interest611
 1,207
 990
 474
 3,282
Operating leases35
 54
 39
 168
 296
Long-term service and maintenance contracts175
 316
 316
 2,619
 3,426
Obligations under commodity purchase and services agreements (b)1,589
 912
 460
 709
 3,670
Total contractual cash obligations$2,601
 $2,823
 $7,737
 $8,423
 $21,584
___________
(a)Includes $5.813 billion of borrowings under the Vistra Operations Credit Facility, $3.626 billion principal amount of Vistra Energy senior notes, $1.0 billion principal amount of Vistra Operations senior notes and $471 million principal amount of long-term debt, including forward capacity agreements, equipment financing agreements and mandatorily redeemable preferred stock. Excludes unamortized premiums, discounts and debt costs.
(b)Includes capacity payments, nuclear fuel and natural gas take-or-pay contracts, coal contracts, business services and nuclear related outsourcing and other purchase commitments. Amounts presented for variable priced contracts reflect the year-end 2018 price for all periods except where contractual price adjustment or index-based prices are specified.

The following are not included in the table above:

the TRA obligation (seelong-term debt maturities, Note 1012 to the Financial Statements);
asset retirement obligations (seeStatements for maturities of lease liabilities and Note 2313 to the Financial Statements);Statements for commitments related to long-term service and maintenance contracts, energy-related contracts and other agreements.
arrangements between affiliated entities and intercompany debt (see Note 21 to the Financial Statements);
individual contracts that have an annual cash requirement of less than $1 million (however, multiple contracts with one counterparty that are more than $1 million on an aggregated basis have been included);
contracts that are cancellable without payment of a substantial cancellation penalty, and
employment contracts with management.


Guarantees


See Note 1513 to the Financial Statements for discussion of guarantees.



OFF–BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.


COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


See Note 1513 to the Financial Statements for discussion of commitments and contingencies.



CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING STANDARDS


See Note 1 to the Financial Statements for discussion of changes in accounting standards.





Item 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK


Market risk is the risk that in the normal course of business we may experience a loss in value due to changes in market conditions that affect economic factors such as commodity prices, interest rates and counterparty credit. Our exposure to market risk is affected by several factors, including the size, duration and composition of our energy and financial portfolio, as well as the volatility and liquidity of markets. Instruments used to manage this exposure include interest rate swaps to hedge debt costs, as well as exchange-traded, over-the-counter contracts and other contractual arrangements to hedge commodity prices.


Risk Oversight


We manage the commodity price, counterparty credit and commodity-related operational risk related to the competitive energy business within limitations established by senior management and in accordance with overall risk management policies.framework established and overseen by the Company's board of directors (Board) and the sustainability and risk committee of the Board, as applicable. Interest rate risk is managed centrally by our treasury function. Market risks are monitored by risk management groups that operate independently of the wholesale commercial operations, utilizing defined practices and analytical methodologies. These techniques measure the risk of change in value of the portfolio of contracts and the hypothetical effect on this value from changes in market conditions and include, but are not limited to, position reporting and review, Value at Risk (VaR) methodologies and stress test scenarios. Key risk control activities include, but are not limited to, transaction review and approval (including credit review), operational and market risk measurement, transaction authority oversight, validation of transaction capture, market price validation and reporting, and portfolio valuation and reporting, including mark-to-market valuation, VaR and other risk measurement metrics.reporting.


Vistra Energy has a risk management organization that enforces applicable risk limits, including the respective policies and procedures to ensure compliance with such limits, and evaluates the risks inherent in our businesses.

Commodity Price Risk


Our business is subject to the inherent risks of market fluctuations in the price of electricity, natural gas and other energy-related products it markets or purchases. We actively manage the portfolio of generation assets, fuel supply and retail sales load to mitigate the near-term impacts of these risks on results of operations. Similar to other participants in the market, we cannot fully manage the long-term value impact of structural declines or increases in natural gas and power prices.


In managing energy price risk, we enter into a variety of market transactions including, but not limited to, short- and long-term contracts for physical delivery, exchange-traded and over-the-counter financial contracts and bilateral contracts with customers. Activities include hedging, the structuring of long-term contractual arrangements and proprietary trading. We continuously monitor the valuation of identified risks and adjust positions based on current market conditions. We strive to use consistent assumptions regarding forward market price curves in evaluating and recording the effects of commodity price risk.


VaR Methodology — A VaR methodology is used to measure the amount of market risk that exists within the portfolio under a variety of market conditions. The resultant VaR produces an estimate of a portfolio's potential for loss given a specified confidence level and considers, among other things, market movements utilizing standard statistical techniques given historical and projected market prices and volatilities.


82
Table of Contents
Parametric processes are used to calculate VaR and are considered by management to be the most effective way to estimate changes in a portfolio's value based on assumed market conditions for liquid markets. The use of this method requires a number of key assumptions, such as use of (i) an assumed confidence level;level, (ii) an assumed holding period (i.e., the time necessary for management action, such as to liquidate positions), and (iii) historical estimates of volatility and correlation data. The table below details a VaR measure related to various portfolios of contracts.


VaR for Underlying Generation Assets and Energy-Related Contracts — This measurement estimates the potential loss in value, due to changes in market conditions, of all underlying generation assets and contracts, based on a 95% confidence level and an assumed holding period of 60 days for adays. The forward period through December 2019.covered by this calculation includes the current and subsequent calendar year at the time of calculation.
Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Month-end average VaR$234 $263 
Month-end high VaR$361 $520 
Month-end low VaR$164 $103 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2018 2017
Month-end average VaR$182
 $92
Month-end high VaR$267
 $140
Month-end low VaR$65
 $62



The increaseVaR risk measures in 2020 were primarily comparable to the month-endprior year. Month-end high VaR risk measurewas lower in 2018 reflects operations acquired2020 due to lower prices and a decrease in volatility in ERCOT as compared to the Merger.prior year.


Interest Rate Risk


The following table provides information concerning our financial instruments at December 31, 20182020 and 20172019 that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. Debt amounts consist of the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities. See Note 1411 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of these financial instruments.
Expected Maturity Date        
(millions of dollars, except percentages)        Expected Maturity Date2020
Total Carrying
Amount		2020
Total Fair
Value		2019
Total Carrying
Amount		2019
Total Fair
Value
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 There-after 
2018
Total Carrying
Amount
 
2018
Total Fair
Value
 
2017
Total Carrying
Amount
 
2017
Total Fair
Value
20212022202320242025There-after
Long-term debt, including current maturities (a):                   Long-term debt, including current maturities (a):
Variable rate debt amount$59
 $59
 $59
 $59
 $3,640
 $1,937
 $5,813
 $5,599
 $4,311
 $4,334
Variable rate debt amount$28 $29 $28 $29 $2,458 $— $2,572 $2,565 $2,700 $2,717 
Average interest rate (b)4.55% 4.55% 4.55% 4.55% 4.59% 4.47% 4.55%   3.98%  Average interest rate (b)1.90 %1.90 %1.90 %1.90 %1.90 %— %1.90 %3.55 %
Debt swapped to fixed (c):                   Debt swapped to fixed (c):
Notional amount$159
 $358
 $—
 $—
 $3,000
 $4,200
 $7,717
   $3,000
  Notional amount$— $— $2,300 $— $— $2,300 $4,600 $4,600 
Average pay rate4.16% 4.10% 4.07% 4.07% 4.34% 5.01% 4.38%   4.59%  Average pay rate3.76 %3.76 %4.18 %4.77 %4.77 %4.77 %
Average receive rate4.56% 4.57% 4.57% 4.57% 4.53% 4.45% 4.53%   4.11%  Average receive rate1.90 %1.90 %1.97 %2.06 %2.06 %2.06 %
___________
(a)Unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs are excluded from the table.
(b)The weighted average interest rate presented is based on the rates in effect at December 31, 2018.
(c)Interest rate swaps have maturity dates through July 2026.

(a)Unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs are excluded from the table.
(b)The weighted average interest rate presented is based on the rates in effect at December 31, 2020.
(c)Interest rate swaps have maturity dates through July 2026. Excludes $2.12 billion of debt swapped to variable that is matched against the terms of $2.12 billion of debt swapped to fixed that effectively fix the out-of-the-money position of such swaps (see Note 11 to the Financial Statements).

At December 31, 2018,2020, the potential reduction of annual pretax earnings over the next twelve months due to a one percentage-point (100 basis points) increase in floating interest rates on long-term debt totaled approximately $14$6 million taking into account the interest rate swaps discussed in Note 1411 to Financial Statements.


83
Table of Contents
Credit Risk


Credit risk relates to the risk of loss associated with nonperformance by counterparties. We minimize credit risk by evaluating potential counterparties, monitoring ongoing counterparty risk and assessing overall portfolio risk. This includes review of counterparty financial condition, current and potential credit exposures, credit rating and other quantitative and qualitative credit criteria. We also employ certain risk mitigation practices, including utilization of standardized master agreements that provide for netting and setoff rights, as well as credit enhancements such as margin deposits and customer deposits, letters of credit, parental guarantees and surety bonds. See Note 1816 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of this exposure.


Bankruptcies — We are party to (i) certain gas transportation agreements with Pacific GasPG&E and Electric Corporation (PG&E) and (ii) a long-term resource adequacy contract with PG&E in connection with the Moss Landing battery storage project, we entered into a long-term renewable power purchase agreement with PG&E, which was originally approved by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in November 2018. PG&E filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in January 2019.

As In November 2019, the bankruptcy court approved PG&E's motion requesting approval of December 31, 2018, we had no outstanding accounts receivable from PG&E and accordingly, we have not recorded a reserve relatedthe assumption of the resource adequacy contract subject to the pre-petition receivables. While our assumptions and conclusions may change, we could have future impairment losses, or specifically with respectCPUC approving the terms of an amendment to the gas transportation agreements, be required to seek alternative, higher-cost fuel transportation methods, if any ofresource adequacy contract, and the CPUC approved the terms of the contracts are not honored byamendment in January 2020. PG&E or the contracts are rejected through theemerged from bankruptcy process.protection in July 2020.



Credit Exposure — Our gross credit exposure (excluding collateral impacts) associated with retail and wholesale trade accounts receivable and net derivative assets arising from commodity contracts and hedging and trading activities totaled $975 million$1.282 billion at December 31, 2018.2020.


At December 31, 2018,2020, Retail segment credit exposure totaled $683$990 million, including $676$982 million of trade accounts receivable and $7$8 million related to derivative assets. Cash deposits and letters of credit held as collateral for these receivables totaled $38$80 million, resulting in a net exposure of $645$910 million. We believe the risk of material loss (after consideration of bad debt allowances) from nonperformance by these customers is unlikely based upon historical experience. Allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable are established for the potential loss from nonpayment by these customers based on historical experience, market or operational conditions and changes in the financial condition of large business customers.


At December 31, 2018,2020, aggregate ERCOT, PJM, NY/NETexas, East and MISOSunset segments credit exposure totaled $292 million including $147$163 million related to derivative assets and $145$129 million of trade accounts receivable, after taking into account master netting agreement provisions but excluding collateral impacts.


Including collateral posted to us by counterparties, our net ERCOT, PJM, NY/NETexas, East and MISOSunset segments exposure was $281 million substantially all of which is with investment grade customers as seen in the following table that presents the distribution of credit exposure at December 31, 2018.2020. Credit collateral includes cash and letters of credit but excludes other credit enhancements such as guarantees or liens on assets.
Exposure
Before Credit
Collateral		Credit
Collateral		Net
Exposure
Investment grade$254 $5 $249 
Below investment grade or no rating38 6 32 
Totals$292 $11 $281 
 
Exposure
Before Credit
Collateral
 
Credit
Collateral
 
Net
Exposure
Investment grade$247
 $—
 $247
Below investment grade or no rating45
 11
 34
Totals$292
 $11
 $281


Significant (10%(i.e., 10% or greater) concentration of credit exposure exists with four counterparties,one counterparty, which represented an aggregate $195$85 million, or 70%30%, of the total net exposure. We view exposure to these counterpartiesthis counterparty to be within an acceptable level of risk tolerance due to the counterparties'counterparty's credit ratings, each of which is rated as investment grade, the counterparties'counterparty's market role and deemed creditworthiness and the importance of our business relationship with the counterparties.counterparty. An event of default by one or more counterparties could subsequently result in termination-related settlement payments that reduce available liquidity if amounts such as margin deposits are owed to the counterparties or delays in receipts of expected settlements owed to us.


Contracts classified as "normal" purchase or sale and non-derivative contractual commitments are not marked-to-market in the financial statements and are excluded from the detail above. Such contractual commitments may contain pricing that is favorable considering current market conditions and therefore represent economic risk if the counterparties do not perform.


At December 31, 2018, interest rate swap exposure in the Corporate and Other non-segment totaled $51 million. There are no collateral offsets. The counterparty credit rating is investment grade.

84

Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


This report and other presentations made by us contain "forward-looking statements." All statements, other than statements of historical facts, that are included in this report, or made in presentations, in response to questions or otherwise, that address activities, events or developments that may occur in the future, including (without limitation) such matters as activities related to our financial or operational projections, capital allocation, capital expenditures, liquidity, dividend policy, business strategy, competitive strengths, goals, future acquisitions or dispositions, development or operation of power generation assets, market and industry developments and the growth of our businesses and operations (often, but not always, through the use of words or phrases such as "intends," "plans," "will likely," "unlikely," "expected," "anticipated," "estimated," "should," "may," "projection," "target," "goal," "objective" and "outlook"), are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that in making any such forward-looking statement our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, any such forward-looking statement involves uncertainties and risks and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the discussion under Item 1A. Risk Factors and Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this annual report on Form 10-K and the following important factors, among others, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in or implied by such forward-looking statements:


•the actions and decisions of judicial and regulatory authorities;
•prohibitions and other restrictions on our operations due to the terms of our agreements;
•prevailing federal, state and local governmental policies and regulatory actions, including those of the legislatures and other government actions of states in which we operate, the U.S. Congress, the FERC, the NERC, the TRE, the public utility commissions of states and locales in which we operate, CAISO, ERCOT, ISO-NE, MISO, NYISO, PJM, the RCT, the NRC, the EPA, the environmental regulatory bodies of states in which we operate, the MSHA and the CFTC, with respect to, among other things:
◦allowed prices;
◦industry, market and rate structure;
◦purchased power and recovery of investments;
◦operations of nuclear generation facilities;
◦operations of fossil-fueled generation facilities;
◦operations of mines;
◦acquisition and disposal of assets and facilities;
◦development, construction and operation of facilities;
◦decommissioning costs;
◦present or prospective wholesale and retail competition;
◦changes in federal, state and local tax laws, rates and policies, including additional regulation, interpretations, amendments, or technical corrections to the TCJA;
◦changes in and compliance with environmental and safety laws and policies, including National Ambient Air Quality Standards, the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, the Mercury and Air Toxics Standard, regional haze program implementation and GHG and other climate change initiatives, and
◦clearing over-the-counter derivatives through exchanges and posting of cash collateral therewith;
▪allowed prices;
▪industry, market and rate structure;
▪purchased power and recovery of investments;
▪operations of nuclear generation facilities;
▪operations of fossil-fueled generation facilities;
▪operations of mines;
▪acquisition and disposal of assets and facilities;
▪development, construction and operation of facilities;
▪decommissioning costs;
▪present or prospective wholesale and retail competition;
▪changes in federal, state and local tax laws, rates and policies, including additional regulation, interpretations, amendments, or technical corrections to the TCJA;
▪changes in and compliance with environmental and safety laws and policies, including the Coal Combustion Residuals Rule, National Ambient Air Quality Standards, the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, the Mercury and Air Toxics Standard, regional haze program implementation and GHG and other climate change initiatives; and
▪clearing over-the-counter derivatives through exchanges and posting of cash collateral therewith;
•expectations regarding, or impacts of, environmental matters, including costs of compliance, availability and adequacy of emission credits, and the impact of ongoing proceedings and potential regulations or changes to current regulations, including those relating to climate change, air emissions, cooling water intake structures, coal combustion byproducts, and other laws and regulations that we are, or could become, subject to, which could increase our costs, result in an impairment of our assets, cause us to limit or terminate the operation of certain of our facilities, or otherwise have a negativenegatively impact our financial effect;results or stock price;
•legal and administrative proceedings and settlements;
•general industry trends;
•economic conditions, including the impact of anany recession or economic downturn;
•investor sentiment relating to climate change and utilization of fossil fuels in connection with power generation could reduce demand for, or increase potential volatility in the market price of, our common stock;
•the severity, magnitude and duration of pandemics, including the COVID-19 pandemic, and the resulting effects on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows;
•the severity, magnitude and duration of extreme weather conditions, includingevents (including winter storm Uri), drought and limitations on access to water, and other weather conditions and natural phenomena, and the resulting effects on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows;
•acts of sabotage, wars or terrorist or cybersecurity threats or activities;
•risk of contract performance claims by us or our counterparties, and risks of, or costs associated with, pursuing or defending such claims;
•our ability to collect trade receivables from counterparties;counterparties in the amount or at the time expected, if at all;
85
Table of Contents
•our ability to attract, and retain profitable customers;
our ability toand profitably serve our customers;
•restrictions on competitive retail pricing;pricing or direct-selling businesses;
•adverse publicity associated with our retail products or direct selling businesses, including our ability to address the marketplace and regulators regarding our compliance with applicable laws;
•changes in wholesale electricity prices or energy commodity prices, including the price of natural gas;
•changes in prices of transportation of natural gas, coal, fuel oil and other refined products;
•sufficiency of, access to, and costs associated with coal, fuel oil, and natural gas inventories and transportation and storage thereof;
•changes in the ability of vendors to provide or deliver commodities as needed;

•beliefs and assumptions about the benefits of state- or federal-based subsidies to our market competition, and the corresponding impacts on us, including if such subsidies are disproportionately available to our competitors;
•the effects of, or changes to, market design and the power and capacity procurement processes in the markets in which we operate;
•changes in market heat rates in the CAISO, ERCOT, ISO-NE, MISO, NYISO and PJM electricity markets;
•our ability to effectively hedge against unfavorable commodity prices, including the price of natural gas, market heat rates and interest rates;
•population growth or decline, or changes in market supply or demand and demographic patterns, particularly in ERCOT, MISO and PJM;
•our ability to mitigate forced outage risk, including managing risk associated with CP in PJM and performance incentives in ISO-NE;
•efforts to identify opportunities to reduce congestion and improve busbar power prices;
•access to adequate transmission facilities to meet changing demands;
•changes in interest rates, commodity prices, rates of inflation or foreign exchange rates;
•changes in operating expenses, liquidity needs and capital expenditures;
•commercial bank market and capital market conditions and the potential impact of disruptions in U.S. and international credit markets;
•access to capital, the attractiveness of the cost and other terms of such capital and the success of financing and refinancing efforts, including availability of funds in capital markets;
•our ability to maintain prudent financial leverage;leverage and achieve our capital allocation objectives;
•our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to make principal and interest payments in respect of, or refinance, our debt obligations;
•our expectation that we will continue to pay a comparable cash dividend on a quarterly basis;
•our ability to implement and successfully execute upon\ our growth strategy, including the completion and integration of mergers, acquisitions and/or joint venture activity, andthe identification and completion of sales and divestitures activity;activity, and the completion and commercialization of our other business development and construction projects;
•competition for new energy development and other business opportunities;
•inability of various counterparties to meet their obligations with respect to our financial instruments;
•counterparties' collateral demands and other factors affecting our liquidity position and financial condition;
•changes in technology (including large scale electricity storage) used by and services offered by us;
•changes in electricity transmission that allow additional power generation to compete with our generation assets;
•our ability to attract and retain qualified employees;
•significant changes in our relationship with our employees, including the availability of qualified personnel, and the potential adverse effects if labor disputes or grievances were to occur;occur or changes in laws or regulations relating to independent contractor status;
•changes in assumptions used to estimate costs of providing employee benefits, including medical and dental benefits, pension and OPEB, and future funding requirements related thereto, including joint and several liability exposure under ERISA;
•hazards customary to the industry and the possibility that we may not have adequate insurance to cover losses resulting from such hazards;
•the impact of our obligations under the TRA;
•our ability to optimize our assets through targeted investment in cost-effective technology enhancements and operations performance initiatives;
•our ability to effectively and efficiently plan, prepare for and execute expected asset retirements and reclamation obligations and the impacts thereof;
•our ability to successfully complete the integration of the businesses ofacquired by Vistra Energy and Dynegy and our ability to successfully capture the full amount of projected operational and financial synergies relating to the Merger,such transactions; and
•actions by credit rating agencies.


86
Table of Contents
Any forward-looking statement speaks only at the date on which it is made, and except as may be required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which it is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or circumstances. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict them. In addition, we may be unable to assess the impact of any such event or condition or the extent to which any such event or condition, or combination of events or conditions, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statement. As such, you should not unduly rely on such forward-looking statements.



INDUSTRY AND MARKET INFORMATION


Certain industry and market data and other statistical information used throughout this report are based on independent industry publications, government publications, reports by market research firms or other published independent sources, including certain data published by CAISO, ERCOT, ISO-NE, MISO, NYISO, PJM, the environmental regulatory bodies of states in which we operate and NYMEX. We did not commission any of these publications, reports or other sources. Some data is also based on good faith estimates, which are derived from our review of internal surveys, as well as the independent sources listed above. Industry publications, reports and other sources generally state that they have obtained information from sources believed to be reliable, but do not guarantee the accuracy and completeness of such information. While we believe that each of these studies, publications, reports and other sources is reliable, we have not independently investigated or verified the information contained or referred to therein and make no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. Forecasts are particularly likely to be inaccurate, especially over long periods of time, and we do not know what assumptions were used in preparing such forecasts. Statements regarding industry and market data and other statistical information used throughout this report involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors.





87
Item 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Table of Contents
Item 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholdersstockholders and the Board of Directors of Vistra Energy Corp.


Opinion on the Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Vistra Energy Corp. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017, and2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, consolidated income (loss), consolidatedstatements of comprehensive income (loss), consolidated statements of cash flows, and consolidated statement of changes in equity, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, for the period October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (Successor Company operations) and the period January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016 (Predecessor Company operations),2020, and the related notes and the schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(b) (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the Successor Company financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and for the period October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Further, in our opinion, the Predecessor Company financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of the Predecessor Company for the period January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016,2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 28, 2019,26, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Fresh-Start Reporting

As discussed in Note 6 to the financial statements, on August 29, 2016 the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the plan of reorganization which became effective on October 3, 2016. Accordingly, the accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 852, Reorganizations, for the Successor Company as a new entity with assets, liabilities, and a capital structure having carrying values not comparable with prior periods as described in Note 1 to the financial statements.


Basis for Opinion


These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB)PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Tax Receivable Agreement Obligation — Refer to Notes 1 and 8 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company has a tax receivable agreement (TRA) obligation that requires the Company to make annual payments to the TRA rights holders based on cash savings in income tax resulting from a step up in the tax basis of certain assets upon emergence from bankruptcy in 2016. The carrying value of the TRA obligation is based on the discounted amount of forecasted payments to the TRA rights holders. Determining the carrying value of the TRA obligation requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions in preparing its forecast of taxable income for a period of approximately 40 years. Changes to either the estimated timing or amount of expected TRA payments impact the carrying value of the obligation. As of December 31, 2020, the carrying value of the TRA obligation totaled $450 million.

88
Table of Contents
Given the significant judgements made by management to estimate the TRA obligation, performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s estimate and assumptions related to the estimated future taxable income required a high degree of auditor judgement and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our income tax specialists.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the evaluation of estimated future taxable income included the following, among others:

•We tested the effectiveness of controls over management’s determination of the TRA obligation carrying amount, including controls over developing estimated future taxable income.

•With the assistance of our income tax specialists, we evaluated the following elements in testing management’s estimated future taxable income:

◦The application of tax laws and regulations

◦Future reversals of existing temporary differences, including the timing and amount of loss carryforwards

•We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s estimates of future taxable income by comparing the estimates to:

◦Historical taxable income

◦Internal communications to management and the Board of Directors

◦Forecasted information included in the Company's press releases as well as in analyst and industry reports for the Company

•We assessed the consistency of future taxable income with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit.

Fair Value Measurements — Level 3 Derivative Assets and Liabilities — Refer to Notes 1 and 15 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company has assets and liabilities whose fair values are based on complex proprietary models and unobservable inputs. These financial instruments can span a broad array of product types and generally include (1) electricity purchases and sales that include power and heat rate positions; (2) forward purchase contracts of congestion revenue rights and financial transmission rights; (3) physical electricity options, spread options, swaptions, and natural gas options; and (4) contracts for natural gas and coal. Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, these financial instruments are generally classified as Level 3 derivative assets or liabilities. As of December 31, 2020, the fair value of the Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities totaled $205 million and $183 million, respectively.

Given management uses complex proprietary models and/or unobservable inputs to estimate the fair value of Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities, performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of the fair value of Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our energy commodity fair value specialists who possess significant quantitative and modeling expertise.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the evaluation of the fair value of Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities included the following, among others:

•We tested the effectiveness of controls over derivative asset and liability valuations, including controls related to price verification of illiquid price curves.

•We assessed to determine if management had consistently applied significant unobservable valuation assumptions.

89
Table of Contents
•We obtained the Company's complete listing of derivative assets and liabilities and related fair values as of December 31, 2020, to confirm our understanding of the types of instruments outstanding and performed a sensitivity analysis to understand the most significant assumptions impacting fair value.

•With the assistance of our energy commodity fair value specialists, we developed independent estimates of the fair value of a sample of Level 3 derivative instruments and compared our estimates to the Company's estimates.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets—Refer to Notes 1 and 21 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. Indicators of impairment may include declines in the forward prices of natural gas or electricity subsequent to the asset acquisition date, or an expectation that "more likely than not" a long-lived asset will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its estimated useful life. Management determines if long-lived assets are impaired by comparing the forecasted undiscounted future cash flows to the carrying value. The forecasted undiscounted future cash flows include significant unobservable inputs such as forward natural gas and electricity prices, forward capacity prices, the effects of enacted environmental rules, generation plant performance, forecasted capital expenditures and forecasted delivered fuel prices. The carrying value of such assets is not recoverable if the forecasted undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying value. If the long-lived assets are not recoverable, fair value will be calculated based on a market participant view and a loss will be recorded based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value. In determining the fair value of the long-lived assets, management uses a combination of a market approach valuation based on transactions of similar assets and an income approach valuation discounting the forecasted future cash flows. In 2020, management evaluated several of its power generation facilities for recoverability. Management concluded that three of the power generation facilities evaluated were not recoverable. The Company recorded impairment losses related to the three facilities of $324 million in 2020. As of December 31, 2020, the total carrying value of long-lived property, plant and equipment assets that are subject to evaluation for indicators of impairment was approximately $13.5 billion.

Given (1) management's evaluation of the recoverability of long-lived assets required management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to the development of forecasted undiscounted future cash flows, and (2) for those long-lived assets deemed impaired, the determination of fair value required management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to the discount rates to apply to the forecasted future cash flows, performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s estimates and assumptions required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our energy commodity fair value specialists and fair value specialists.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the evaluation of management’s estimate of the forecasted future cash flows utilized in the evaluation of recoverability and determination of fair value of the long-lived assets deemed to be impaired included the following, among others:

•We tested the effectiveness of controls over management’s development of the assumptions used to estimate the forecasted future cash flows for the long-lived assets.

•We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s forecasted generation plant performance and forecasted capital expenditures assumptions by comparing the estimates to:

◦Historical generation volume output and capital expenditures for the respective long-lived assets

◦Internal communications to management and the Board of Directors

•With the assistance of our energy commodity fair value specialists:

◦We developed independent estimates of the forward natural gas and electricity prices and compared our estimates to the Company's estimates.

◦We evaluated the reasonableness of the Company's forward capacity prices, including the key assumptions underlying the development of those prices.

90
Table of Contents
•With the assistance of our fair value specialists:

◦We developed a range of independent discount rates and compared those to the discount rates used by management in the income approach used to determine fair value of the impaired long-lived assets.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


Dallas, TXTexas
February 28, 201926, 2021


We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.

91

Table of Contents
VISTRA ENERGY CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME (LOSS)OPERATIONS
(Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts)
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Operating revenues (Note 5)$11,443 $11,809 $9,144 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(5,174)(5,742)(5,036)
Operating costs(1,622)(1,530)(1,297)
Depreciation and amortization(1,737)(1,640)(1,394)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(1,035)(904)(926)
Impairment of long-lived assets(356)0 0 
Operating income1,519 1,993 491 
Other income (Note 21)34 56 47 
Other deductions (Note 21)(42)(15)(5)
Interest expense and related charges (Note 21)(630)(797)(572)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement (Note 8)5 (37)(79)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment (Note 21)4 16 17 
Income (loss) before income taxes890 1,216 (101)
Income tax (expense) benefit (Note 7)(266)(290)45 
Net income (loss)624 926 (56)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest12 2 2 
Net income (loss) attributable to Vistra$636 $928 $(54)
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding:
Basic488,668,263 494,146,268 504,954,371 
Diluted491,090,468 499,935,490 504,954,371 
Net income (loss) per weighted average share of common stock outstanding:
Basic$1.30 $1.88 $(0.11)
Diluted$1.30 $1.86 $(0.11)

Successor

Predecessor

Year Ended December 31,
Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016

Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016

2018
2017


Operating revenues$9,144

$5,430

$1,191


$3,973
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(5,036)
(2,935)
(720)

(2,082)
Net gain from commodity hedging and trading activities—

—

—


282
Operating costs(1,297)
(973)
(208)

(664)
Depreciation and amortization(1,394)
(699)
(216)

(459)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(926)
(600)
(208)

(482)
Impairment of long-lived assets—

(25)
—


—
Operating income (loss)491

198

(161)

568
Other income (Note 23)47

37

10


19
Other deductions (Note 23)(5)
(5)
—


(75)
Interest expense and related charges (Note 11)(572)
(193)
(60)

(1,049)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement (Note 10)(79)
213

(22)

—
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment (Note 23)17

—

—


—
Reorganization items (Note 5)—

—

—


22,121
Income (loss) before income taxes(101)
250

(233)

21,584
Income tax (expense) benefit (Note 9)45

(504)
70


1,267
Net income (loss)(56)
(254)
(163)

22,851
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest2

—

—




Net loss attributable to Vistra Energy$(54)
$(254)
$(163)



Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding:











Basic504,954,371

427,761,460

427,560,620




Diluted504,954,371

427,761,460

427,560,620




Net loss per weighted average share of common stock outstanding:











Basic$(0.11)
$(0.59)
$(0.38)



Diluted$(0.11)
$(0.59)
$(0.38)



Dividend declared per share of common stock$—

$—

$2.32






See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


VISTRA ENERGY CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Millions of Dollars)
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Net income (loss)$624 $926 $(56)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax effects:
Effects related to pension and other retirement benefit obligations (net of tax benefit of $5, $4 and $2)(18)(8)(6)
Adoption of new accounting standard0 0 1 
Total other comprehensive loss(18)(8)(5)
Comprehensive income (loss)606 918 (61)
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest12 2 2 
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Vistra$618 $920 $(59)
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016		  Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016
 2018 2017   
Net income (loss)$(56) $(254) $(163)  $22,851
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax effects:        
Effects related to pension and other retirement benefit obligations (net of tax (benefit) expense of $(2), $(6), $3 and $—)(6) (23) 6
  —
Adoption of new accounting standard (Note 1)1
 —
 —
  —
Other comprehensive income, net of tax effects — cash flow hedges (net of tax benefit of $— in all periods)—
 —
 —
  1
Total other comprehensive income (loss)(5) (23) 6
  1
Comprehensive income (loss)(61) (277) (157)  22,852
Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest2
 —
 —
   
Comprehensive loss attributable to Vistra Energy$(59) $(277) $(157)   


See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

92
Table of Contents

VISTRA CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Millions of Dollars)
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Cash flows — operating activities:
Net income (loss)$624 $926 $(56)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization2,048 1,876 1,533 
Deferred income tax expense (benefit), net230 281 (62)
Impairment of long-lived assets (Note 4)356 0 0 
Loss on disposal of investment in NELP (Note 21)29 0 0 
Unrealized net (gain) loss from mark-to-market valuations of commodities(231)(696)380 
Unrealized net loss from mark-to-market valuations of interest rate swaps155 220 5 
Change in asset retirement obligation liability7 (48)(27)
Asset retirement obligation accretion expense43 53 50 
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement (Note 8)(5)37 79 
Bad debt expense110 82 55 
Stock-based compensation65 47 73 
Other, net(22)(12)37 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable — trade(33)(88)(207)
Inventories(59)(44)61 
Accounts payable — trade(40)(221)90 
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets and liabilities27 98 (80)
Margin deposits, net(20)170 (221)
Accrued interest(20)80 (105)
Accrued taxes22 (4)(64)
Accrued employee incentive39 1 40 
Tax Receivable Agreement payment (Note 8)0 (2)(16)
Asset retirement obligation settlement(118)(121)(100)
Major plant outage deferral2 (19)(22)
Other — net assets219 (22)73 
Other — net liabilities(91)142 (45)
Cash provided by operating activities3,337 2,736 1,471 
Cash flows — investing activities:
Capital expenditures, including nuclear fuel purchases and LTSA prepayments(1,259)(713)(530)
Ambit acquisition (net of cash acquired) (Note 2)0 (506)0 
Crius acquisition (net of cash acquired) (Note 2)0 (374)0 
Cash acquired in the Merger (Note 2)0 0 445 
Proceeds from sales of nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities (Note 21)433 431 252 
Investments in nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities (Note 21)(455)(453)(274)
Proceeds from sales of environmental allowances165 197 1 
Purchases of environmental allowances(504)(322)(5)
Proceeds from sales of assets24 6 7 
93
Table of Contents
VISTRA ENERGY CORP.
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(Millions of Dollars)

Successor

Predecessor

Year Ended December 31,
Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016

Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016

2018
2017


Cash flows — operating activities:







Net income (loss)$(56)
$(254)
$(163)

$22,851
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by (used in) operating activities:







Depreciation and amortization1,533

835

285


532
Deferred income tax expense (benefit), net(62)
418

(76)

(1,270)
Unrealized net (gain) loss from mark-to-market valuations of commodities380

145

165


36
Unrealized net (gain) loss from mark-to-market valuations of interest rate swaps5

(29)
11


—
Gain on extinguishment of liabilities subject to compromise (Note 6)—

—

—


(24,344)
Net loss from adopting fresh start reporting (Note 5)—

—

—


2,013
Contract claims adjustments of Predecessor (Note 5)—

—

—


13
Impairment of long-lived assets (Note 4)—

25

—


—
Write-off of intangible and other assets (Note 23)—

—

—


45
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement (Note 10)79

(213)
22


—
Change in asset retirement obligation liability(27)
112

—


—
Asset retirement obligation accretion expense50

60

6


—
Stock-based compensation73

—

—


—
Other, net92

69

1


63
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:







Affiliate accounts receivable/payable — net—

—

—


31
Accounts receivable — trade(207)
7

135


(216)
Inventories61

22

3


71
Accounts payable — trade90

(30)
(79)

26
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets and liabilities(80)
(1)
(48)

29
Margin deposits, net(221)
146

(193)

(124)
Accrued interest(105)
(10)
32


(10)
Accrued taxes(64)
33

12


(13)
Accrued employee incentive40

(24)
24


(30)
Alcoa contract settlement (Note 4)—

238

—


—
Tax Receivable Agreement payment (Note 10)(16)
(26)
—


—
Major plant outage deferral(22)
(66)
—


—
Other — net assets73

4

(2)

(3)
Other — net liabilities(145)
(75)
(54)

62
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities1,471

1,386

81


(238)
Cash flows — financing activities:







Issuances of long-term debt (Note 14)1,000

—

—


—
Repayments/repurchases of debt (Note 14)(3,075)
(191)
—


(2,655)
Net borrowings under accounts receivable securitization program (Note 13)339

—

—


—
Debt tender offer and other debt financing fee(236)
(8)
—


—
Stock repurchase (Note 16)(763)
—

—


—
VISTRA CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Millions of Dollars)
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Other, net24 17 3 
Cash used in investing activities(1,572)(1,717)(101)
Cash flows — financing activities:
Issuances of long-term debt (Note 11)0 6,507 1,000 
Repayments/repurchases of debt (Note 11)(1,008)(7,109)(3,075)
Net borrowings/(payments) under accounts receivable securitization program (Note 10)(150)111 339 
Borrowings under Revolving Credit Facility (Note 11)1,075 650 0 
Repayments under Revolving Credit Facility (Note 11)(1,425)(300)0 
Debt tender offer and other debt financing fees (Note 11)(17)(203)(236)
Stock repurchase (Note 14)0 (656)(763)
Dividends paid to stockholders (Note 14)(266)(243)0 
Other, net(5)6 12 
Cash used in financing activities(1,796)(1,237)(2,723)
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(31)(218)(1,353)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — beginning balance475 693 2,046 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — ending balance$444 $475 $693 

VISTRA ENERGY CORP.
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(Millions of Dollars)

Successor

Predecessor

Year Ended December 31,
Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016

Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016

2018
2017


Incremental Term Loan B Facility (Note 14)—

—

1,000


—
Special Dividend (Note 16)—

—

(992)

—
Net proceeds from issuance of preferred stock (Note 5)—

—

—


69
Payments to extinguish claims of TCEH first lien creditors (Note 5)—

—

—


(486)
Payment to extinguish claims of TCEH unsecured creditors (Note 5)—

—

—


(429)
Borrowings under TCEH DIP Roll Facilities and DIP Facility (Note 14)—

—

—


4,680
TCEH DIP Roll Facilities and DIP Facility financing fees—

—

—


(112)
Other, net12

(2)
(2)

(8)
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities(2,723)
(201)
6


1,059
Cash flows — investing activities:







Capital expenditures, including LTSA prepayments(378)
(114)
(48)

(230)
Nuclear fuel purchases(118)
(62)
(41)

(33)
Development and growth expenditures (Note 3)(34)
(190)
—


—
Cash acquired in the Merger445

—

—


—
Odessa acquisition (Note 3)—

(355)
—


—
Lamar and Forney acquisition — net of cash acquired (Note 3)—

—

—


(1,343)
Changes in restricted cash (Predecessor)—

—

—


233
Proceeds from sales of nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities (Note 23)252

252

25


201
Investments in nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities (Note 23)(274)
(272)
(30)

(215)
Notes/advances due from affiliates—

—

—


(41)
Other, net6

14

1


8
Cash used in investing activities(101)
(727)
(93)

(1,420)
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash (Successor); Net change in cash and cash equivalents (Predecessor)(1,353)
458

(6)

(599)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — beginning balance (Successor); Cash and cash equivalents — beginning balance (Predecessor)2,046

1,588

1,594


1,400
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — ending balance (Successor); Cash and cash equivalents — ending balance (Predecessor)$693

$2,046

$1,588


$801


See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

94
Table of Contents

VISTRA CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Millions of Dollars)
December 31,
20202019
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$406 $300 
Restricted cash (Note 21)19 147 
Trade accounts receivable — net (Note 21)1,279 1,365 
Inventories (Note 21)515 469 
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets (Note 16)748 1,333 
Margin deposits related to commodity contracts257 202 
Prepaid expense and other current assets205 298 
Total current assets3,429 4,114 
Restricted cash (Note 21)19 28 
Investments (Note 21)1,759 1,537 
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiary (Note 21)0 124 
Operating lease right-of-use assets (Note 12)45 44 
Property, plant and equipment — net (Note 21)13,499 13,914 
Goodwill (Note 6)2,583 2,553 
Identifiable intangible assets — net (Note 6)2,446 2,748 
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets (Note 16)258 136 
Accumulated deferred income taxes (Note 7)838 1,066 
Other noncurrent assets332 352 
Total assets$25,208 $26,616 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Short-term borrowings (Note 11)$0 $350 
Accounts receivable securitization program (Note 10)300 450 
Long-term debt due currently (Note 11)95 277 
Trade accounts payable880 947 
Commodity and other derivative contractual liabilities (Note 16)789 1,529 
Margin deposits related to commodity contracts33 8 
Accrued income taxes16 1 
Accrued taxes other than income210 200 
Accrued interest131 151 
Asset retirement obligations (Note 21)103 141 
Operating lease liabilities (Note 12)8 14 
Other current liabilities471 506 
Total current liabilities3,036 4,574 
Long-term debt, less amounts due currently (Note 11)9,235 10,102 
Operating lease liabilities (Note 12)40 41 
Commodity and other derivative contractual liabilities (Note 16)624 396 
Accumulated deferred income taxes (Note 7)1 2 
Tax Receivable Agreement obligation (Note 8)447 455 
Asset retirement obligations (Note 21)2,333 2,097 
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits (Note 21)1,131 989 
Total liabilities16,847 18,656 
95
Table of Contents
VISTRA ENERGY CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Millions of Dollars)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2018 2017
ASSETS   
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$636
 $1,487
Restricted cash (Note 23)57
 59
Trade accounts receivable — net (Note 23)1,087
 582
Inventories (Note 23)412
 253
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets (Note 18)730
 190
Margin deposits related to commodity contracts361
 30
Prepaid expense and other current assets152
 72
Total current assets3,435
 2,673
Restricted cash (Note 23)—
 500
Investments (Note 23)1,250
 1,240
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiary (Note 23)131
 —
Property, plant and equipment — net (Note 23)14,612
 4,820
Goodwill (Note 8)2,068
 1,907
Identifiable intangible assets — net (Note 8)2,493
 2,530
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets (Note 18)109
 58
Accumulated deferred income taxes (Note 9)1,336
 710
Other noncurrent assets590
 162
Total assets$26,024
 $14,600
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY   
Current liabilities:   
Accounts receivable securitization program (Note 13)$339
 $—
Long-term debt due currently (Note 14)191
 44
Trade accounts payable945
 473
Commodity and other derivative contractual liabilities (Note 18)1,376
 224
Margin deposits related to commodity contracts4
 4
Accrued taxes10
 58
Accrued taxes other than income182
 136
Accrued interest77
 16
Asset retirement obligations (Note 23)156
 99
Other current liabilities345
 297
Total current liabilities3,625
 1,351
Long-term debt, less amounts due currently (Note 14)10,874
 4,379
Commodity and other derivative contractual liabilities (Note 18)270
 102
Accumulated deferred income taxes (Note 9)10
 —
Tax Receivable Agreement obligation (Note 10)420
 333
Asset retirement obligations (Note 23)2,217
 1,837
Identifiable intangible liabilities — net (Note 8)401
 36
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits (Note 23)340
 220
Total liabilities18,157
 8,258
VISTRA CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Millions of Dollars)
December 31,
20202019
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 13)00
Total equity (Note 14):
Common stock (par value — $0.01; number of shares authorized — 1,800,000,000)
(shares outstanding: December 31, 2020 — 489,305,888; December 31, 2019 — 487,698,111)
5 5 
Treasury stock, at cost (shares: December 31, 2020 — 41,043,224; December 31, 2019 — 41,043,224)(973)(973)
Additional paid-in-capital9,786 9,721 
Retained deficit(399)(764)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(48)(30)
Stockholders' equity8,371 7,959 
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiary(10)1 
Total equity8,361 7,960 
Total liabilities and equity$25,208 $26,616 

VISTRA ENERGY CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Millions of Dollars)
 Year Ended December 31,
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 15)

 

Total equity (Note 16):   
Common stock (par value — $0.01; number of shares authorized — 1,800,000,000)
(shares outstanding: December 31, 2018 — 493,215,309; December 31, 2017 — 428,398,802)		5
 4
Additional paid-in-capital9,329
 7,765
Retained deficit(1,449) (1,410)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(22) (17)
Stockholders' equity7,863
 6,342
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiary4
 —
Total equity7,867
 6,342
Total liabilities and equity$26,024
 $14,600


See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

96
VISTRA ENERGY CORP.
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED EQUITY
(Millions of Dollars)
 Common Stock (Successor) / Capital Account (Predecessor) Additional Paid-In Capital (Successor) Retained Deficit (Successor) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Total Stockholders' Equity Noncontrolling Interests (Successor) Total Equity
Equity in Successor:             
Balances at October 3, 2016$—
 $—
 $—
 $—
 $—
 $—
 $—
Shares issued upon Emergence4
 7,737
 —
 —
 7,741
 —
 7,741
Effects of stock-based compensation—
 4
 —
 —
 4
 —
 4
Other issuances of common stock—
 1
 —
 —
 1
 —
 1
Net loss—
 —
 (163) —
 (163) —
 (163)
Dividends declared on common stock—
 —
 (992) —
 (992) —
 (992)
Pension and OPEB liability — change in funded status—
 —
 —
 6
 6
 —
 6
Balances at December 31, 2016$4
 $7,742
 $(1,155) $6
 $6,597
 $—
 $6,597
Effects of stock-based compensation—
 23
 —
 —
 23
 —
 23
Net loss—
 —
 (254) —
 (254) —
 (254)
Pension and OPEB liability — change in funded status—
 —
 —
 (23) (23) —
 (23)
Other—
 —
 (1) —
 (1) —
 (1)
Balances at December 31, 2017$4
 $7,765
 $(1,410) $(17) $6,342
 $—
 $6,342
Stock and stock compensation awards issued in connection with the Merger1
 1,901
 —
 —
 1,902
 —
 1,902
Treasury stock—
 (778) —
 —
 (778) —
 (778)
Effects of stock-based compensation—
 72
 —
 —
 72
 —
 72
Tangible equity units acquired—
 369
 —
 —
 369
 —
 369
Warrants acquired—
 2
 —
 —
 2
 —
 2
Net loss—
 —
 (54) —
 (54) (2) (56)
Adoption of new accounting standards (Note 1)—
 —
 16
 1
 17
 —
 17
Pension and OPEB liability — change in funded status—
 —
 —
 (6) (6) —
 (6)
Investment by noncontrolling interest—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 6
 6
Other—
 (2) (1) —
 (3) —
 (3)
Balances at December 31, 2018$5
 $9,329
 $(1,449) $(22) $7,863
 $4
 $7,867
              
Membership interests in Predecessor:             
Balances at December 31, 2015$(22,851) $—
 $—
 $(33) $(22,884) 
 
Net income22,851
 —
 —
 —
 22,851
   
Cash flow hedges — change during period—
 —
 —
 33
 33
   
Balances at October 2, 2016$—
 $—
 $—
 $—
 $—
 
 
Table of Contents

VISTRA CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Millions of Dollars)
Common StockTreasury StockAdditional Paid-In CapitalRetained DeficitAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Total Stockholders' EquityNoncontrolling Interest in SubsidiaryTotal Equity
Balances at December 31, 2017$4 $0 $7,765 $(1,410)$(17)$6,342 $— $6,342 
Stock and stock compensation awards issued in connection with the Merger1 — 1,901 — — 1,902 — 1,902 
Stock repurchases— (778)— — — (778)— (778)
Effects of stock-based compensation— — 72 — — 72 — 72 
Tangible equity units acquired— — 369 — — 369 — 369 
Warrants acquired— — 2 — — 2 — 2 
Net loss— — — (54)— (54)(2)(56)
Adoption of new accounting standards— — — 16 1 17 — 17 
Pension and OPEB liability — change in funded status— — — — (6)(6)— (6)
Investment by noncontrolling interest— — — — — — 6 6 
Other— — (2)(1)— (3)— (3)
Balances at December 31, 2018$5 $(778)$10,107 $(1,449)$(22)$7,863 $4 $7,867 
Stock repurchases— (641)— — — (641)— (641)
Shares issued for tangible equity unit contracts— 446 (446)— — 0 — 0 
Effects of stock-based compensation— — 62 — — 62 — 62 
Net income (loss)— — — 928 — 928 (2)926 
Dividends declared on common stock— — — (243)— (243)— (243)
Adoption of new accounting standard— — — (2)— (2)— (2)
Pension and OPEB liability — change in funded status— — — — (8)(8)— (8)
Other— — (2)2 — 0 (1)(1)
Balances at December 31, 2019$5 $(973)$9,721 $(764)$(30)$7,959 $1 $7,960 
Effects of stock-based compensation— — 65 — — 65 — 65 
Net income (loss)— — — 636 — 636 (12)624 
Dividends declared on common stock— — — (266)— (266)— (266)
Adoption of new accounting standard— — — (4)— (4)— (4)
Pension and OPEB liability — change in funded status— — — — (18)(18)— (18)
Investment by noncontrolling interest— 1 1 
Other— — 0 (1)— (1)— (1)
Balances at December 31, 2020$5 $(973)$9,786 $(399)$(48)$8,371 $(10)$8,361 

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

97

Table of Contents
VISTRA ENERGY CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1.BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

1. BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of Business


References in this report to "we," "our," "us" and "the Company" are to Vistra Energy and/or its subsidiaries, in the Successor period, and to TCEH and/or its subsidiaries in the Predecessor periods, as apparent in the context. See Glossary for defined terms.


Vistra Energy is a holding company operating an integrated retail and electric power generation business primarily in markets throughout the U.S. Through our subsidiaries, we are engaged in competitive electricityenergy market activities including power generation, wholesale energy sales and purchases, commodity risk management and retail sales of electricity and natural gas to end users. Effective July 2, 2020, we changed our name from Vistra Energy Corp. to Vistra Corp. (Vistra) to distinguish from companies that are involved in the exploring for, producing, refining, or transporting fossil fuels (many of which use "energy" in their names) and to better reflect or integrated business model, which combines a retail electricity and natural gas business focused on serving its customers with new and innovative products and services and an electric power generation business powering the communities we serve with safe, reliable power.


Vistra Energy has six6 reportable segments: (i) Retail, (ii) ERCOT,Texas, (iii) PJM,East, (iv) NY/NE (comprising NYISO and ISO-NE),West, (v) MISOSunset and (vi) Asset Closure. In the third quarter of 2020, Vistra updated its reportable segments to reflect changes in how the Company's Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) makes operating decisions, assesses performance and allocates resources. Management believes that the revised reportable segments provide enhanced transparency into the Company's long-term sustainable assets and its commitment to managing the retirement of economically and environmentally challenged plants. The following is a summary of the updated segments:

•The Sunset segment represents plants with announced retirement plans that were previously reported in the ERCOT, PJM and MISO segments. As we announced significant plant closures in the third quarter of 2020, management believes it is important to have a segment which differentiates between operating plants with defined retirement plans and operating plants without defined retirement plans.
•The East segment represents Vistra's electricity generation operations in the Eastern Interconnection of the U.S. electric grid, other than assets that are now part of the Sunset or Asset Closure segments, respectively, and includes operations in PJM, ISO-NE and NYISO that were previously reported in the PJM and NY/NE segments, respectively.
•The West segment represents Vistra's electricity generation operations in CAISO and MISO segments were established on the Merger Date to reflect markets served by businesses acquiredwas previously reported in the Merger.Corporate and Other non-segment. As reflected by the Moss Landing and Oakland ESS projects (see Note 3), the Company expects to expand its operations in the West segment.

In addition, the ERCOT segment was renamed the Texas segment. There were no changes to the Retail and Asset Closure segments. All historical segment results within these consolidated financial statements have been recast to be in alignment with our new segmentation. See Note 2220 for further information concerning reportable business segments.


Ambit Transaction

On November 1, 2019, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra completed the Petition Date, EFH Corp.acquisition of Ambit (Ambit Transaction). Because the Ambit Transaction closed on November 1, 2019, Vistra's consolidated financial statements and the substantial majoritynotes related thereto do not include the financial condition or the operating results of Ambit and its direct and indirect subsidiaries includingprior to November 1, 2019. See Note 2 for a summary of the Debtors, filed voluntary petitions for relief under the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.Ambit Transaction.


Crius Transaction

On July 15, 2019, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra completed the Effective Date,acquisition of the equity interests of two wholly owned subsidiaries of TCEHCrius that were Debtors inindirectly owned the Chapter 11 Cases (the TCEH Debtors)operating business of Crius (Crius Transaction). Because the Crius Transaction closed on July 15, 2019, Vistra's consolidated financial statements and certain EFH Corp.the notes related thereto do not include the financial condition or the operating results of Crius and its subsidiaries (the Contributed EFH Debtors) completed their reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code and emerged from the Chapter 11 Cases as subsidiaries ofprior to July 15, 2019. See Note 2 for a newly formed company, Vistra Energy (our Successor). On the Effective Date, Vistra Energy was spun-off from EFH Corp. in a tax-free transaction to the former first lien creditors of TCEH (Spin-Off). As a result, assummary of the Effective Date, Vistra Energy is a holding company for subsidiaries principally engaged in competitive electricity market activities including power generation, wholesale energy sales and purchases, commodity risk management and retail salesCrius Transaction.

98
Table of electricity to end users. TCEH is the Predecessor to Vistra Energy. See Note 5 for further discussion regarding the Chapter 11 Cases.Contents

Dynegy Merger Transaction


On the Merger Date, Vistra Energy and Dynegy completed the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Dynegy merged with and into Vistra, Energy, with Vistra Energy continuing as the surviving corporation. Because the Merger closed on April 9, 2018, Vistra Energy'sVistra's consolidated financial statements and the notes related thereto do not include the financial condition or the operating results of Dynegy prior to April 9, 2018. See Note 2 for a summary of the Merger transaction and business combination accounting.


COVID-19 Pandemic

In March 2020, the World Health Organization categorized the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) as a pandemic, and U.S. Government declared the COVID-19 outbreak a national emergency. The U.S. government has deemed electricity generation, transmission and distribution as "critical infrastructure" providing essential services during this global emergency. As a provider of critical infrastructure, Vistra has an obligation to provide critically needed power to homes, businesses, hospitals and other customers. Vistra remains focused on protecting the health and well-being of its employees and the communities in which it operates while assuring the continuity of its business operations.

The Company's consolidated financial statements reflect estimates and assumptions made by management that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods presented. The Company considered the impact of COVID-19 on the assumptions and estimates used and determined that there have been no material adverse impacts on the Company's results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020.

In response to the global pandemic related to COVID-19, the CARES Act was signed into law on March 27, 2020. See Note 7 for a summary of certain anticipated tax-related impacts of the CARES Act to the Company.

February 2021 Weather Event

In February 2021, a severe winter storm with extremely cold temperatures affected much of the U.S., including Texas. This severe weather resulted in surging demand for power, gas supply shortages, operational challenges for generators, and a significant load shed event that was ordered by ERCOT beginning on February 15, 2021 and continuing through February 18, 2021. At the time we issued these financial statements, we expect the impact of the weather event to be a material loss that will be reflected in our first quarter 2021 results of operations. However, uncertainty exists with respect to the financial impact of the weather event due in part to outstanding pricing and settlement data from ERCOT, the outcome of potential litigation arising from the event, or any corrective action taken by the State of Texas, ERCOT, the RCT, or the PUCT to resettle pricing across any portion of the supply chain (i.e. fuel supply, wholesale pricing of generation, or allocating the financial impacts of market-wide load shed ratably across all retail market participants), that is currently being considered or may be considered by any such parties.

Basis of Presentation

As of the Effective Date, Vistra Energy applied fresh start reporting under the applicable provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 852, Reorganizations (ASC 852). Fresh start reporting included (1) distinguishing the consolidated financial statements of the entity that was previously in restructuring (TCEH, or the Predecessor) from the financial statements of the entity that emerges from restructuring (Vistra Energy, or the Successor), (2) accounting for the effects of the Plan of Reorganization, (3) assigning the reorganization value of the Successor entity by measuring all assets and liabilities of the Successor entity at fair value, and (4) selecting accounting policies for the Successor entity. The financial statements of Vistra Energy for periods subsequent to the Effective Date are not comparable to the financial statements of TCEH for periods prior to the Effective Date, as those previous periods do not give effect to any adjustments to the carrying values of assets or amounts of liabilities that resulted from the Plan of Reorganization and the related application of fresh start reporting. The reorganization value of Vistra Energy was assigned to its assets and liabilities in conformity with the procedures specified by FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations, and the portion of the reorganization value that was not attributable to identifiable tangible or intangible assets was recognized as goodwill. See Note 6 for further discussion of fresh start reporting.

The consolidated financial statements of the Predecessor reflect the application of ASC 852 as it applies to entities that have filed a petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. As a result, the consolidated financial statements of the Predecessor have been prepared as if TCEH was a going concern and contemplated the realization of assets and liabilities in the normal course of business. During the Chapter 11 Cases, the Debtors operated their businesses as debtors-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.The guidance requires that transactions and events directly associated with the reorganization be distinguished from the ongoing operations of the business. In addition, the guidance provides for changes in the accounting and presentation of liabilities. Prior to the Effective Date, the Predecessor recorded the effects of the Plan of Reorganization in accordance with ASC 852. See Predecessor Reorganization Items in Note 5 for further discussion of these accounting and reporting changes.


The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and on the same basis as the audited financial statements included in our annual report on2019 Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, with the exception of the changes in reportable segments as detailed above. Adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and financial position have been included therein.10-K. All intercompany items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. All dollar amounts in the financial statements and tables in the notes are stated in millions of U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated.


Use of Estimates


Preparation of financial statements requires estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the reporting of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates and the reported amounts of revenue and expense, including fair value measurements, estimates of expected obligations, judgmentjudgments related to the potential timing of events and other estimates. In the event estimates and/or assumptions prove to be different from actual amounts, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information.


99
Table of Contents
Derivative Instruments and Mark-to-Market Accounting


We enter into contracts for the purchase and sale of electricity, natural gas, coal, uranium and other commodities utilizing instruments such as options, swaps, futures and forwards primarily to manage commodity price and interest rate risks. If the instrument meets the definition of a derivative under accounting standards related to derivative instruments and hedging activities, changes in the fair value of the derivative are recognized in net income as unrealized gains and losses. This recognition is referred to as mark-to-market accounting. The fair values of our unsettled derivative instruments under mark-to-market accounting are reported in the consolidated balance sheets as commodity and other derivative contractual assets or liabilities. We report derivative assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets without taking into consideration netting arrangements we have with counterparties. Margin deposits that contractually offset these assets and liabilities are reported separately in the consolidated balance sheets, except for certain margin amounts related to changes in fair value on CME transactions that beginning in January 2017, are legally characterized as settlement of derivative contracts rather than collateral. When derivative instruments are settled and realized gains and losses are recorded, the previously recorded unrealized gains and losses and derivative assets and liabilities are reversed. See Notes 1715 and 1816 for additional information regarding fair value measurement and commodity and other derivative contractual assets and liabilities. A commodity-related derivative contract may be designated as a normal purchase or sale if the commodity is to be physically received or delivered for use or sale in the normal course of business. If designated as normal, the derivative contract is accounted for under the accrual method of accounting (not marked-to-market) with no balance sheet or income statement recognition of the contract until settlement.


Because derivative instruments are frequently used as economic hedges, accounting standards related to derivative instruments and hedging activities allow for hedge accounting, which provides for the designation of such instruments as cash flow or fair value hedges if certain conditions are met. At December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, there were no derivative positions accounted for as cash flow or fair value hedges.


For the Successor period, weWe report commodity hedging and trading results as revenue, fuel expense or purchased power in the consolidated statements of consolidated income (loss)operations depending on the type of activity. Electricity hedges, financial natural gas hedges and trading activities are primarily reported as revenue. Physical or financial hedges for coal, diesel or uranium, along with physical natural gas trades, are primarily reported as fuel expense. For the Predecessor periods, all activity was reported as a net gain (loss) from commodity hedging and trading activities. Realized and unrealized gains and losses associated with interest rate swap transactions are reported in the consolidated statements of consolidated income (loss)operations in interest expense for both the Predecessor and Successor.expense.



Revenue Recognition


Revenue is recognized when electricity is delivered to our customers in an amount that we expect to invoice for volumes delivered or services provided. Sales tax is excluded from revenue. Energy sales and services that have been delivered but not billed by period end are estimated. Accrued unbilled revenues are based on estimates of customer usage since the date of the last meter reading provided by the independent system operators or electric distribution companies. Estimated amounts are adjusted when actual usage is known and billed. See Note 7 for detailed descriptions of revenue from contracts with customers.


We record wholesale generation revenue when volumes are delivered or services are performed for transactions that are not accounted for on a mark-to-market basis. These revenues primarily consist of physical electricity sales to the ISO or ISO/RTO, ancillary service revenue for reliability services, capacity revenue for making installed generation and demand response available for system reliability requirements, and certain other electricity sales contracts. See Note 75 for detailed descriptions of revenue from contracts with customers. See Derivative Instruments and Mark-to-Market Accounting for revenue recognition related to derivative contracts.


Advertising Expense


We expense advertising costs as incurred and include them within selling, general and administrativeSG&A expenses. Advertising expenses totaled $46$43 million, $44 million, $9$49 million and $35$46 million for the Successor period for the year ended December 31, 20182020, 2019 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016,2018, respectively.


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets


We evaluate long-lived assets (including intangible assets with finite lives) for impairment whenever indications of impairment exist. The carrying value of such assets is deemed to be impaired if the projected undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value. If there is such impairment, a loss would beis recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value. Fair value is determined primarily by discounted cash flows, supported by available market valuations, if applicable. See Note 21 for details of impairments of long-lived assets recorded in 2020.


100
Table of Contents
Finite-lived intangibles identified as a result of fresh start reporting or purchase accounting are amortized over their estimated useful lives based on the expected realization of economic effects. See Note 86 for details of intangible assets with indefinitefinite lives, including discussion of fair value determinations.


Goodwill and Intangible Assets with Indefinite Lives


As part of fresh start reporting and purchase accounting, reorganization value or the purchase consideration is generally allocated, first, to identifiable tangible assets and liabilities, identifiable intangible assets and liabilities, then any remaining excess reorganization value is allocated to goodwill (see Note 6).goodwill. We evaluate goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment at least annually, or when indications of impairment exist. We have established October 1 as the date we evaluate goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment. The Predecessor's annual evaluation date was December 1. See Note 86 for details of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives, including discussion of fair value determinations.


Nuclear Fuel


Nuclear fuel is capitalized and reported as a component of our property, plant and equipment in our consolidated balance sheets. Amortization of nuclear fuel is calculated on the units-of-production method and is reported as a component of fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees in our consolidated statements of consolidated income (loss).operations.


Major Maintenance Costs


Major maintenance costs incurred by the Successor during generation plant outages are deferred and amortized into operating costs over the period between the major maintenance outages for the respective asset. Other routine costs of maintenance activities are charged to expense as incurred and reported as operating costs in our consolidated statements of consolidated income (loss). The Predecessor charged all maintenance activities to expense as incurred.operations.



Defined Benefit Pension Plans and OPEB Plans


On the Merger Date, Vistra Energy assumed the pension and OPEB plans that Dynegy had provided to certain of its eligible employees and retirees. The excess of the benefit obligations over the fair value of plan assets was recognized as a liability. See Note 2 for additional information regarding the Merger.


On the Effective Date, EFH Corp. transferred sponsorship of certain employee benefit plans (including related assets), programs and policies to a subsidiary of Vistra Energy. Certain health care and life insurance benefits are offered to eligible employees and their dependents upon the retirement of such employee from the company. Pension benefits are offered to eligible employees under collective bargaining agreements based on either a traditional defined benefit formula or a cash balance formula. Effective January 1, 2017, the OPEB plan was amended to discontinue the life insurance benefits for active employees. Costs of pension and OPEB plans are dependent upon numerous factors, assumptions and estimates.

Prior to the Effective Date, our Predecessor bore a portion of the costs of the EFH Corp. sponsored pension and OPEB plans and accounted for the arrangement under multiple employer plan accounting.


See Note 1917 for additional information regarding pension and OPEB plans.


Stock-Based Compensation


Stock-based compensation is accounted for in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation. The fair value of our non-qualified stock options is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Forfeitures are recognized as they occur. We recognize compensation expense for graded vesting awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. See Note 2018 for additional information regarding stock-based compensation.


Sales and Excise Taxes


Sales and excise taxes are accounted for as "pass through" items on the consolidated balance sheets with no effect on the consolidated statements of consolidated income (loss)operations (i.e., the tax is billed to customers and recorded as trade accounts receivable with an offsetting amount recorded as a liability to the taxing jurisdiction)jurisdiction in other current liabilities in our consolidated statements of operations).


101
Table of Contents
Franchise and Revenue-Based Taxes


Unlike sales and excise taxes, franchise and gross receiptrevenue-based taxes are not a "pass through" item.items. These taxes are imposed on us by state and local taxing authorities, based on revenues or kWh delivered, as a cost of doing business and are recorded as an expense. Rates we charge to customers are intended to recover our costs, including the franchise and grossrevenue-based receipt taxes, but we are not acting as an agent to collect the taxes from customers. We report franchise and revenue-based taxes in SG&A expense in our consolidated statements of consolidated income (loss).operations.


Income Taxes


On the Merger Date, Vistra Energy and Dynegy effected a merger transaction that for tax purposes was treated as a tax-free reorganization in which Vistra Energy survived as the parent entity. In general, all of Dynegy's tax basis and attributes were transferred to Vistra, Energy, including approximately $4.2$4.5 billion of utilizable NOLs and refundable AMTalternative minimum tax (AMT) tax credits.

Prior to the Effective Date, EFH Corp. filed a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return that included the results of our Predecessor; however, our Predecessor's income tax expense and related balance sheet amounts were recorded as if it filed separate corporate income tax returns.


Investment tax credits are accounted for under the deferral method, which resulted in a reduction to the basis of the Upton 2our solar facilityand battery storage facilities of 0, $2 million and $78 million and a corresponding increase in the deferred tax assets in 2018.2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.


Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities as required under accounting rules. See Note 9.7.


We report interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as current income tax expense. See Note 9.7.



Tax Receivable Agreement (TRA)


The Company accounts for its obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement (TRA)TRA as a liability in our consolidated balance sheets (see Note 10)8). The carrying value of the TRA obligation represents the discounted amount of projected payments under the TRA. The projected payments are based on certain assumptions, including but not limited to (a) the federal corporate income tax rate, and (b) estimates of our taxable income in the current and future years.years and (c) additional states that Vistra operates in, including the relevant tax rate and apportionment factor for each state. Our taxable income takes into consideration the current federal tax code and reflects our current estimates of future results of the business.


The carrying value of the obligation is being accreted to the amount of the gross expected obligation using the effective interest method and the interest rate estimated at the Emergence Date.method. Changes in the estimated amount of this obligation resulting from changes to either the timing or amount of TRA payments are recognized in the period of change and measured using the discount rate inherent in the initial fair value of the obligation. These changes are included on our statementconsolidated statements of consolidated income (loss)operations under the heading of Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement.


Accounting for Contingencies


Our financial results may be affected by judgments and estimates related to loss contingencies. Accruals for loss contingencies are recorded when management determines that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and that such economic loss can be reasonably estimated. Such determinations are subject to interpretations of current facts and circumstances, forecasts of future events and estimates of the financial impacts of such events. See Note 1513 for a discussion of contingencies.


Cash and Cash Equivalents


For purposes of reporting cash and cash equivalents, temporary cash investments purchased with a remaining maturity of three months or less are considered cash equivalents.


Restricted Cash


The terms of certain agreements require the restriction of cash for specific purposes. See Notes 14 and 23Note 21 for more details regarding restricted cash.


102
Table of Contents
Property, Plant and Equipment


In connection with fresh start reporting, carrying amounts of property, plant and equipment were adjusted to estimated fair values as of the Effective Date (see Note 6). Property, plant and equipment added subsequent to the Effective Date has been recorded at estimated fair values at the time of acquisition for assets acquired or at cost for capital improvements and individual facilities developed (see Notes 2 and 3). Significant improvements or additions to our property, plant and equipment that extend the life of the respective asset are capitalized at cost, while other costs are expensed when incurred. The cost of self-constructed property additions includes materials and both direct and indirect labor, including payroll-related costs. Interest related to qualifying construction projects and qualifying software projects is capitalized in accordance with accounting guidance related to capitalization of interest cost. See Note 11.21.


Depreciation of our property, plant and equipment (except for nuclear fuel) is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated service lives of the properties. Depreciation expense is calculated on an asset-by-asset basis. Estimated depreciable lives are based on management's estimates of the assets' economic useful lives. See Note 23.21.


Asset Retirement Obligations (ARO)


A liability is initially recorded at fair value for an asset retirement obligation associated with the legal obligation associated with law, regulatory, contractual or constructive retirement requirements of tangible long-lived assets in the period in which it is incurred if a fair value is reasonably estimable. At initial recognition of an ARO obligation, an offsetting asset is also recorded for the long-lived asset that the liability corresponds with, which is subsequently depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset. These liabilities primarily relate to our nuclear generation plant decommissioning, land reclamation related to lignite mining and removal of lignite/coal-fueled plant ash treatment facilities. Over time, the liability is accreted for the change in present value and the initial capitalized costs are depreciated over the remaining useful lives of the assets. Generally, changes in estimates related to ARO obligations are recorded as increases or decreases to the liability and related asset as information becomes available. Changes in estimates related to assets that have been retired or for which capitalized costs are not recoverable are recorded as operating costs in the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 21.

Regulatory Asset or Liability

The costs to ultimately decommission the Comanche Peak nuclear power plant are recoverable through the regulatory rate making process as part of Oncor's delivery fees. As a result, the asset retirement obligation and the investments in the decommissioning trust are accounted for as rate regulated operations. Changes in these accounts, including investment income and accretion expense, do not impact net income, but are reported as a change in the corresponding regulatory asset or liability balance that is reflected in the statements ofour consolidated income (loss). See Note 23.balance sheets as other noncurrent assets or other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits.



Inventories


Inventories consist of materials and supplies, fuel stock and natural gas in storage. Materials and supplies inventory is valued at weighted average cost and is expensed or capitalized when used for repairs/maintenance or capital projects, respectively. Fuel stock and natural gas in storage are reported at the lower of cost (on(calculated on a weighted average basis) or market.net realizable value. We expect to recover the value of inventory costs in the normal course of business. See Note 23.21.


Investments


Investments in a nuclear decommissioning trust fund are carried at current market value in the consolidated balance sheets. Assets related to employee benefit plans represent investments held to satisfy deferred compensation liabilities and are recorded at current market value. See Note 2321 for discussion of these and other investments.


Unconsolidated Investments


We use the equity method of accounting for investments in affiliates over which we exercise significant influence. Our share of net income (loss) from these affiliates is recorded to equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated investment in the consolidated statements of consolidated net income (loss).operations. See Note 23.21.


103
Table of Contents
Noncontrolling Interest


Noncontrolling interest is comprised of the 20% of Electric Energy, Inc. (EEI) that we do not own. EEI is our consolidated subsidiary that owns a coal facility in Joppa, Illinois. This noncontrolling interest is classified as a component of equity separate from stockholders' equity in the consolidated balance sheets.


Treasury Stock


Treasury stock purchases are accounted for under the cost method whereby the entire cost of the acquired stock is recorded as treasury stock, which is presented in our consolidated balance sheets as a reduction to additional paid-in capital. See Note 16.14.


Leases

At the inception of a contract we determine if it is or contains a lease, which involves the contract conveying the right to control the use of explicitly or implicitly identified property, plant, or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration.

Right-of-use (ROU) assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the commencement date of the underlying lease based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. We use our secured incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the lease commencement date to determine the present value of lease payments. Operating leases are included in operating lease ROU assets, operating lease liabilities (current) and operating lease liabilities (noncurrent) on our consolidated balance sheet. Finance leases are included in property, plant and equipment, other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits on our consolidated balance sheet. Lease term includes options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise the option. We apply the practical expedient permitted by ASC 842 to not separate lease and non-lease components for a majority of our lease asset classes.

Leases with an initial lease term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet; we recognize lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

We also present lessor sublease income on a net basis against the related lessee lease expense.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards Issued Prior to 2020


Revenue from Contracts with Customers Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes — In December 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (Topic 740).The ASU enhances and simplifies various aspects of the income tax accounting guidance including the elimination of certain exceptions related to the approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. The new guidance also simplifies aspects of the accounting for franchise taxes and enacted changes in tax laws or rates and clarifies the accounting for transactions that result in a step-up in the tax basis of goodwill. We adopted all provisions of this ASU in the first quarter of 2020, and it did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement — In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. The ASU removes disclosure requirements for (a) the reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2, (b) the policy for timing of transfers between levels and (c) the valuation processes for Level 3. The ASU requires new disclosures around (a) the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and (b) the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. We adopted this ASU in the first quarter of 2020, and the updated disclosures are included in Note 15.

104
Table of Contents
Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract — In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract. The ASU requires a customer in a cloud hosting arrangement that is a service contract to determine which implementation costs to capitalize and which costs to expense based on the project stage of the implementation. The ASU also requires the customer to expense the capitalized implementation costs over the term of the hosting arrangement. The customer is required to apply the existing impairment and abandonment guidance on the capitalized implementation costs. We adopted this ASU in the first quarter of 2020, and it did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

Financial Instruments—Credit Losses — In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses. The ASU requires organizations to measure all expected credit losses for financial instruments held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. We adopted this ASU in the first quarter of 2020, and it did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

Leases — On January 1, 2018,2019, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers2016-02, Leases (Topic 606)842) and all related amendments (new revenuelease standard) using the modified retrospective method with the cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained deficit for all contracts outstanding at the time of adoption. We recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying the new revenue standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods. TheWe expect the impact of the adoption of the new revenuelease standard was immaterial and we expect the adoption to continue to be immaterial to our net income on an ongoing basis. Our retail energy charges and wholesale generation, capacity and contract revenues will continue to be recognized when electricity and other services are delivered to our customers. The impact of adopting the new revenuelease standard primarily relates to the deferralrecognition of acquisition costs associated with retail contracts with customers that were previously expensedlease liabilities and ROU assets for all leases classified as incurred.operating leases. Under the new revenuelease standard, these amounts are capitalized andeach ROU asset will be amortized over the expected lifelease term and liability settled at the end of the customer.

As of January 1, 2018,lease term. We recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying the changes made tonew lease standard by recording ROU assets of $85 million and lease liabilities of $123 million in our consolidated balance sheet for the adoption of the new revenue standard was as follows:
 December 31, 2017 Adoption of New Revenue Standard 
January 1,
2018
Impact on consolidated balance sheet:     
Assets     
Prepaid expense and other current assets$72
 $5
 $77
Accumulated deferred income taxes$710
 $(4) $706
Other noncurrent assets$162
 $16
 $178
Equity     
Retained deficit$(1,410) $17
 $(1,393)


The disclosure of the impact of adoption on our statement of consolidated income (loss) and consolidated balance sheet was as follows:
 Year Ended December 31, 2018
 As Reported Amount Without Adoption of New Revenue Standard 
Effect of Change
Higher (Lower)
Impact on statement of consolidated income (loss):     
Operating revenues$9,144
 $9,141
 $3
Selling, general and administrative expenses(926) (939) 13
Net income (loss)(56) (68) 12

 December 31, 2018
 As Reported Balances Without Adoption of New Revenue Standard 
Effect of Change
Higher (Lower)
Impact on consolidated balance sheet:     
Assets     
Prepaid expense and other current assets$152
 $145
 $7
Accumulated deferred income taxes1,336
 1,349
 (13)
Other noncurrent assets590
 559
 31
Equity
 
  
Retained deficit$(1,449) $(1,478) $29

sheet. See Note 712 for the disclosures required by the new revenuelease standard.


Statement of Cash Flows —In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18 Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. The ASU requires restricted cash to be included in the cash and cash equivalents and a reconciliation between the change in cash and cash equivalents and the amounts presented on the balance sheet. We adopted the standard on January 1, 2018. The ASU modified our presentation of our statements of consolidated cash flows, and retrospective application to comparative periods presented was required. For the Successor period for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016, our statements of consolidated cash flows previously reflected a source of cash of $186 million and $48 million, respectively, reported as changes in restricted cash that is now reported in net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. See the statements of consolidated cash flows and Note 23 for disclosures related to the adoption of this accounting standard.

Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income — In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The ASU permits the reclassification of income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on items within accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) to retained earnings. We adopted this ASU in the fourth quarter of 2018, and the impact was additional tax expense to AOCI of $1 million with the offset to retained earnings.

Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans —In August 2018, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2018-14, Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans. The ASU removes disclosure requirements for (a) the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year, (b) related party disclosures about the amount of future annual benefits covered by insurance and annuity contracts and significant transactions between the employer or related parties and the plan and (c) the effects of a one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates on the aggregate of the service and interest cost components of net periodic benefit costs and benefit obligation for postretirement health care benefits. The ASU requires new disclosures for (a) the weighted-average interest crediting rates for cash balance plans and other plans with promised interest crediting rates and (b) an explanation of the reasons for significant gains and losses related to changes in the benefit obligation for the period. We adopted this ASU in the fourth quarter of 2018, and the updated disclosures are included in Note 19.17.



Leases Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income —In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (ASU 2016-02), which was further amended through several updates issued by the FASB in 2018. The ASU amends previous GAAP to require lessees to recognize leases on-balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. The ASU requires the lessee to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases. Leases will be classified as finance and operating with classifications affecting the pattern and expense recognition in the income statement.

We adopted the new standard on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective approach. The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. We have elected the practical expedient which permits us to not reassess our prior conclusion about lease classification and initial direct costs under the new standard. We have also elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all applicable asset classes. We have also elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify. On adoption, we currently expect to recognize additional liabilities within the range of approximately $230 million to $280 million, with corresponding right-of-use assets of the same amount based on the present value of the remaining rental payments for existing leases. The adoption of this standard will have an immaterial impact to beginning retained earnings and the statements of consolidated income (loss).

Changes in Accounting Standards

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The ASU will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and early adoption is permitted. The ASU removes disclosure requirements for (a)permits the reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2, (b)reclassification of income tax effects of the policy for timing of transfers between levels and (c) the valuation processes for Level 3. The ASU will require new disclosures around (a) the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included inTCJA on items within accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) to retained earnings. We adopted this ASU in the fourth quarter of 2018, and the impact was additional tax expense to AOCI of $1 million with the offset to retained deficit (see Note 7).

Revenue from Contracts with Customers —On January 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and all related amendments (new revenue standard) using the modified retrospective method for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements heldall contracts outstanding at the endtime of adoption. We recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying the revenue standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained deficit. The impact of the reporting periodadoption of the revenue standard was immaterial and (b)we expect the rangeadoption to continue to be immaterial to our net income on an ongoing basis. Our retail energy charges and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs usedwholesale generation, capacity and contract revenues will continue to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. Webe recognized when electricity and other services are currently evaluating thedelivered to our customers. The impact of this ASU on our disclosures.adopting the revenue standard primarily relates to the deferral of acquisition costs associated with retail contracts with customers that were previously expensed as incurred. Under the revenue standard, these amounts are capitalized and amortized over the expected life of the customer.


105
Table of Contents
Adoption of Accounting Standards Issued in 2020

In August 2018,March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. The ASU willprovides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference LIBOR or another rate that is expected to be discontinued. The amendments in the ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning afterall entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 15, 2019 and early31, 2022. The adoption is permitted. The ASU requires a customer in a cloud hosting arrangement that is a service contract to determine which implementation costs to capitalize and which costs to expense based on the project stage of the implementation. The ASU also requires the customer to expense the capitalized implementation costs over the term of the hosting arrangement. The customer is required to apply the existing impairment and abandonment guidance on the capitalized implementation costs. We are currently evaluating the impact of this ASUguidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.



In March 2020, the SEC amended Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X regarding financial disclosure requirements for registered debt offerings involving subsidiaries as either issuers or guarantors and affiliates whose securities are pledged as collateral. This new guidance narrows the circumstances that require separate financial statements of subsidiary issuers and guarantors and streamlines the alternative disclosures required in lieu of those statements. This rule is effective January 4, 2021 with earlier adoption permitted. We elected to adopt this rule in the first quarter of 2020. Accordingly, summarized financial information has been presented only for the issuer and guarantors of the Company's registered debt securities, and the location of the required disclosures has been moved outside the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and is provided in Part II, Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Financial Condition — Guarantor Summary Financial Information. In October 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-09, Debt (Topic 470) — Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-10762, to reflect the SEC's new disclosure rules on guaranteed debt securities adopted by the Company.


2.ACQUISITIONS, MERGER TRANSACTION AND BUSINESS COMBINATION ACCOUNTING

Ambit Transaction

On November 1, 2019 (Ambit Acquisition Date), Volt Asset Company, Inc., an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra, completed the Ambit Transaction. Ambit is an energy retailer selling both electricity and natural gas products to residential and small business customers in 17 states. Vistra funded the purchase price of $555 million (including cash acquired and net working capital) using cash on hand. All of Ambit's outstanding debt was repaid from the purchase price at closing and not assumed by Vistra.

Crius Transaction

On July 15, 2019 (Crius Acquisition Date), Vienna Acquisition B.C. Ltd., an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra, completed the acquisition of the equity interests of two wholly owned subsidiaries of Crius that indirectly own the operating business of Crius. Crius is an energy retailer selling both electricity and natural gas products to residential and small business customers in 19 states. Vistra funded the purchase price of $400 million (including $382 million for outstanding trust units) using cash on hand. In addition, Vistra assumed $140 million of outstanding debt and acquired $26 million of cash at the closing of the Crius Transaction. See Note 11 for discussion of debt assumed in the Crius Transaction.

Ambit and Crius Business Combination Accounting

We believe the Ambit Transaction has (i) augmented Vistra's existing retail marketing capabilities with additional direct selling capability and a proprietary technology platform, (ii) reduced risk and aided expansion into higher margin channels by improving Vistra's match of its generation to load profile due to a high degree of overlap of Vistra's generation fleet with Ambit's approximately 11 TWh of annual load, primarily in ERCOT and PJM and (iii) enhanced the integrated value proposition through collateral and transaction efficiencies, particularly via Ambit's retail electric portfolio.

We believe the Crius Transaction has (i) reduced risk and aided expansion into higher margin channels by improving Vistra's match of its generation to load profile due to a high degree of overlap of Vistra's generation fleet with Crius' approximately 10 TWh of annual electricity load, (ii) established a platform for growth by leveraging Vistra's existing retail marketing capabilities and Crius' experienced team and (iii) enhanced the integrated value proposition through collateral and transaction efficiencies, particularly via Crius' retail electric portfolio.

106
Table of Contents
2.MERGER TRANSACTION AND BUSINESS COMBINATION ACCOUNTING

Each of the Ambit Transaction and Crius Transaction, respectively, was accounted for in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations (ASC 805), with identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed recorded at their estimated fair values on the Ambit Acquisition Date and Crius Acquisition Date, respectively. The combined results of operations are reported in our consolidated financial statements beginning as of the respective Ambit Acquisition Date and Crius Acquisition Date. A summary of the techniques used to estimate the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities, as well as their classification within the fair value hierarchy (see Note 15), is listed below:

•Working capital was valued using available market information (Level 2).
•Acquired derivatives were valued using the methods described in Note 15 (Level 2 or Level 3).
•Acquired retail customer relationship was valued based on discounted cash flow analysis of acquired customers and estimated attrition rates (Level 3).
•Crius' long-term debt was valued using a market approach (Level 2).

The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price to the fair value amounts recognized for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed related to the Ambit Transaction and Crius Transaction, respectively, as of the Ambit Acquisition Date and Crius Acquisition Date, respectively. The Ambit Transaction purchase price was $555 million (including cash acquired and net working capital) and the Crius Transaction purchase price was $400 million. The final purchase price allocations were completed in the second quarter of 2020 for the Crius Transaction and the third quarter of 2020 for the Ambit Transaction.
Ambit Transaction and Crius Transactions Final Purchase Price Allocations
Ambit TransactionCrius Transaction
Final
Purchase Price
Allocation		Measurement Period Adjustments recorded through September 30, 2020Final
Purchase Price
Allocation		Measurement Period Adjustments recorded through June 30, 2020
Cash and cash equivalents$49 $0 $26 $0 
Net working capital32 3 (9)(42)
Accumulated deferred income taxes0 0 0 (36)
Identifiable intangible assets218 (45)317 23 
Goodwill258 44 243 38 
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets23 0 18 0 
Other noncurrent assets13 0 17 (3)
Total assets acquired593 2 612 (20)
Identifiable intangible liabilities0 0 2 (34)
Long-term debt, including amounts due currently0 0 140 0 
Commodity and other derivative contractual liabilities28 0 40 0 
Accumulated deferred income taxes0 0 14 14 
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits10 2 16 0 
Total liabilities assumed38 2 212 (20)
Identifiable net assets acquired$555 $0 $400 $0 

Acquisition costs incurred in the Ambit Transaction and Crius Transaction totaled $1 million and $2 million, respectively. For the Ambit Acquisition Date through December 31, 2019, our consolidated statements of operations include revenues and net income acquired in the Ambit Transaction totaling $193 million and $2 million, respectively. For the Crius Acquisition Date through December 31, 2019, our consolidated statements of operations include revenues and net income acquired in the Crius Transaction totaling $453 million and 0, respectively. The net income acquired in the Ambit Transaction and Crius Transaction include intangible amortization and transition related expenses.

107
Table of Contents
Ambit and Crius Transaction Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information — The following unaudited consolidated pro forma financial information for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 assumes that the Ambit and Crius Transactions occurred on January 1, 2018 (i.e., represents our results for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 plus the results for either Ambit Transaction or Crius Transaction for the period not owned by us, respectively). The unaudited consolidated pro forma financial information is provided for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the Ambit Transaction and Crius Transaction been completed on January 1, 2018, nor is the unaudited consolidated pro forma financial information indicative of future results of operations, which may differ materially from the consolidated pro forma financial information presented here.
Ambit TransactionCrius Transaction
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2019201820192018
Revenues$12,931 $10,446 $12,373 $10,379 
Net income (loss) (a)$949 $(95)$876 $(43)
Net income (loss) attributable to Vistra$951 $(93)$878 $(41)
Net income (loss) attributable to Vistra per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — basic$1.92 $(0.18)$1.78 $(0.08)
Net income (loss) attributable to Vistra per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — diluted$1.90 $(0.18)$1.76 $(0.08)
__________
(a)Decrease in pro forma net income compared to consolidated net income is driven by unrealized losses on hedging activities of Crius and amortization of intangible assets.

The consolidated unaudited pro forma financial information presented above includes adjustments for incremental depreciation and amortization as a result of the fair value determination of the net assets acquired and the related impacts on tax expense.

Dynegy Merger Transaction

On the Merger Date, Vistra Energy and Dynegy completed the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Dynegy merged with and into Vistra, Energy, with Vistra Energy continuing as the surviving corporation. The Merger iswas intended to qualify as a tax-free reorganization under the Internal Revenue Code, as amended,IRC, so that none of Vistra, Energy, Dynegy or any of the Dynegy stockholders willwould recognize any gain or loss in the transaction, except that Dynegy stockholders could recognize a gain or loss with respect to cash received in lieu of fractional shares of Vistra Energy'sVistra's common stock. Vistra Energy is the acquirer for both federal tax and accounting purposes.


At the closing ofOn the Merger Date, each issued and outstanding share of Dynegy common stock, par value $0.01 per share, other than shares owned by Vistra Energy or its subsidiaries, held in treasury by Dynegy or held by a subsidiary of Dynegy, was automatically converted into 0.652 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Vistra Energy (the Exchange Ratio), except that cash was paid in lieu of fractional shares, which resulted in Vistra Energy issuing 94,409,573 shares of Vistra Energy common stock to the former Dynegy stockholders, as well as converting stock options, equity-based awards, tangible equity units and warrants. The total number of Vistra Energy shares outstanding at the close of the Merger was 522,932,453 shares. Dynegy stock options and equity-based awards outstanding immediately prior to the Merger Date were generally automatically converted upon completion of the Merger into stock options and equity-based awards, respectively, with respect to Vistra Energy'sVistra's common stock, after giving effect to the Exchange Ratio.



Dynegy Business Combination Accounting


We believe the Merger provideshas provided and continues to provide significant potential strategic benefits and opportunities to Vistra, Energy, including increased scale and market diversification, rebalanced asset portfolio and improved earnings and cash flow.flows. The Merger is beingwas accounted for in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations (ASC 805), with identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed recorded at their estimated fair values on the Merger Date. The combined results of operations are reported in our consolidated financial statements beginning as of the Merger Date. A summary of the techniques used to estimate the preliminary fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities, as well as their classification within the fair value hierarchy (see Note 17)15), is listed below:


•Working capital was valued using available market information (Level 2).
108
Table of Contents
•Acquired property, plant and equipment was valued using a combination of an income approach and a market approach. The income approach utilized a discounted cash flow analysis based upon a debt-free, free cash flow model (Level 3).
•Acquired derivatives were valued using the methods described in Note 1715 (Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3).
•Contracts with terms that were not at current market prices were also valued using a discounted cash flow analysis (Level 3). The cash flows generated by the contracts were compared with their cash flows based on current market prices with the resulting difference discounted to present value and recorded as either an intangible asset or liability.
•Long-term debt was valued using a market approach (Level 2).
•AROs were recorded in accordance with ASC 410, Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations (Level 3).


The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the preliminaryfinal allocation of the purchase price to the fair value amounts recognized for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed related to the Merger as of the Merger Date. Based on the opening price of Vistra Energy common stock on the Merger Date, the purchase price was approximately $2.3 billion. The preliminary values included below represent our current best estimates for property plant and equipment, identifiable intangible assets and liabilities, goodwill, inventories, asset retirement obligations, contingent liabilities and deferred taxes. During the yearthree months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2019, the purchase price allocation was completed. During the period from April 9, 2018 through March 31, 2019, we updated the initial purchase price allocation reported as of June 30, 2018 with revised valuation estimatesfinal valuations by increasing property, plant and equipment by $158$173 million, decreasing intangible assets by $36 million, increasing goodwill by $161$175 million, decreasing accounts receivable, inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets by $7$10 million, increasing accumulated deferred tax asset by $101$127 million, decreasing other noncurrent assets by $109$113 million, increasing trade accounts payable and other current liabilities by $43$89 million, increasing other noncurrent liabilities by $172$177 million, increasing asset retirement obligations, including amounts due currently by $58$56 million as well as other minor adjustments. The valuation revisions were a result of updated inputs used in determining the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities. The purchase price allocation is substantially complete, but is dependent upon final valuation determinations, which may materially change from our current estimates. Goodwill is currently recorded at the corporate and other non-segment operations pending the final valuation determinations. We currently expect the final purchase price allocation will be completed no later than the first quarter

Dynegy shares outstanding as of April 9, 2018 (in millions)144.8 
Exchange Ratio0.652 
Vistra shares issued for Dynegy shares outstanding (in millions)94.4 
Opening price of Vistra common stock on April 9, 2018$19.87 
Purchase price for common stock$1,876 
Fair value of equity component of tangible equity units369 
Fair value of outstanding stock compensation awards attributable to pre-combination service26 
Fair value of outstanding warrants2 
Total purchase price$2,273 


Dynegy Merger Final Purchase Price Allocation
Cash and cash equivalents$445 
Trade accounts receivables, inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets853 
Property, plant and equipment10,535 
Accumulated deferred income taxes518 
Identifiable intangible assets351 
Goodwill175 
Other noncurrent assets419 
Total assets acquired13,296 
Trade accounts payable and other current liabilities733 
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets and liabilities, net422 
Asset retirement obligations, including amounts due currently475 
Long-term debt, including amounts due currently8,919 
Other noncurrent liabilities469 
Total liabilities assumed11,018 
Identifiable net assets acquired2,278 
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiary5 
Total purchase price$2,273 

109
Table of 2019 and goodwill will be allocated to the related reporting units at that time.Contents
Dynegy shares outstanding as of April 9, 2018 (in millions)144.8
Exchange Ratio0.652
Vistra Energy shares issued for Dynegy shares outstanding (in millions)94.4
Opening price of Vistra Energy common stock on April 9, 2018$19.87
Purchase price for common stock$1,876
Fair value of equity component of tangible equity units$369
Fair value of outstanding stock compensation awards attributable to pre-combination service$26
Fair value of outstanding warrants$2
Total purchase price$2,273


Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation
Cash and cash equivalents$445
Trade accounts receivables, inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets856
Property, plant and equipment10,520
Accumulated deferred income taxes492
Identifiable intangible assets351
Goodwill161
Other noncurrent assets423
Total assets acquired13,248
Trade accounts payable and other current liabilities687
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets and liabilities, net422
Asset retirement obligations, including amounts due currently477
Long-term debt, including amounts due currently8,920
Other noncurrent liabilities464
Total liabilities assumed10,970
Identifiable net assets acquired2,278
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiary5
Total purchase price$2,273

Acquisition costs incurred in the Merger totaled less than $1 million and $25 million for the yearyears ended December 31, 2018.2019 and 2018, respectively. For the period from the Merger Date through December 31, 2018, our consolidated statements of consolidated income (loss)operations include revenues and net income (loss) acquired in the Merger totaling $3.902 billion and $224 million respectively.


Dynegy Merger Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information — The following unaudited pro forma financial information for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 assumes that the Merger occurred on January 1, 2017.2018. The unaudited pro forma financial information is provided for informationinformational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the Merger been completed on January 1, 2017,2018, nor is the unaudited pro forma financial information indicative of future results of operations, which may differ materially from the pro forma financial information presented here.
Year Ended December 31, 2018
Revenues$10,595 
Net loss$(268)
Net loss attributable to Vistra$(265)
Net loss attributable to Vistra per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — basic$(0.52)
Net loss attributable to Vistra per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — diluted$(0.52)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2018 2017
Revenues$10,595
 $10,509
Net loss$(268) $(969)
Net loss attributable to Vistra Energy$(265) $(983)
Net loss attributable to Vistra Energy per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — basic$(0.52) $(1.83)
Net loss attributable to Vistra Energy per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — diluted$(0.52) $(1.83)


The unaudited pro forma financial information presented above includes adjustments for incremental depreciation and amortization as a result of the fair value determination of the net assets acquired, interest expense on debt assumed in the Merger, effects of the Merger on tax expense (benefit), changes in the expected impacts of the tax receivable agreement due to the Merger, and other related adjustments.




110
3.ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT OF GENERATION FACILITIES

Table of Contents
Battery3.ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT OF GENERATION FACILITIES

Texas Segment Solar Generation and Energy Storage Projects (Successor)

We have completed the construction of our first battery energy storage system. In October 2018, we were awarded a $1 million grant from the TCEQ for our battery energy storage system at Upton 2 solar facility. The grant is part of the Texas Emissions Reduction Plan. The 10 MW lithium-ion energy storage system will capture excess solar energy produced during the day and releases the energy in late afternoon and early evening, when demand is highest. The project became operational on December 31, 2018.


In June 2018,September 2020, we announced that we will enter into a 20-year resource adequacy contract with Pacific Gasthe planned development of up to 668 MW of solar photovoltaic power generation facilities and Electric Company (PG&E)260 MW of battery ESS in Texas. Estimated commercial operation dates for these facilities range from Summer 2021 to develop a 300 MW battery energy storage project at our Moss Landing Power Plant site in California. PG&E filed its application with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in June 2018 and the CPUC approved the contract in November 2018. We anticipate the battery storage project will enter commercial operations by the fourth quarter of 2020.Fall 2022.


Odessa Acquisition (Successor)

In August 2017, La Frontera Holdings, LLC (La Frontera), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra Energy, purchased a 1,054 MW CCGT natural gas-fueled generation plant (and other related assets and liabilities) located in Odessa, Texas (Odessa Facility) from Odessa-Ector Power Partners, L.P., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Koch Ag & Energy Solutions, LLC (Koch) (altogether, the Odessa Acquisition). La Frontera paid an aggregate purchase price of approximately $355 million, plus a five-year earn-out provision, to acquire the Odessa Facility. The purchase price was funded by cash on hand.

The Odessa Acquisition was accounted for as an asset acquisition. Substantially all of the approximately $355 million purchase price was assigned to property, plant and equipment in our consolidated balance sheet. Additionally, the initial fair value associated with an earn-out provision of approximately $16 million was included as consideration in the overall purchase price. The earn-out provision requires cash payments to be made to Koch if spark-spreads related to the pricing point of the Odessa Facility exceed certain thresholds. Subsequent to the acquisition, the earn-out provision has been accounted for as a derivative in our consolidated financial statements. Partial buybacks of the earn-out provision were settled in February and May 2018.

Upton 2 Solar Development (Successor)

Phase I — In May 2017, we acquired the rights to develop, construct and operate a utility scale solar photovoltaic power generation facility in Upton County, Texas (Upton 2). As part of this project, we entered into a turnkey engineering, procurement and construction agreement to construct the approximately 180 MW facility. During 2017 and 2018, weWe spent approximately $231 million related to this project primarily for progress payments under the engineering, procurement and construction agreement and the acquisition of the development rights. The facility began test operations in March 2018 and commercial operations began in June 2018.


LamarUpton 2 Phase II — In 2018, we completed the construction of our first battery energy storage system (ESS). In October 2018, we were awarded a $1 million grant from the TCEQ for our battery ESS at our Upton 2 solar facility. The grant is part of the Texas Emissions Reduction Plan. The 10 MW lithium-ion ESS captures excess solar energy produced during the day and Forney Acquisition (Predecessor)releases the energy in late afternoon and early evening, when demand is highest. The Upton 2 Phase II battery ESS became operational in December 2018.


West Segment Energy Storage Projects

Oakland — In June 2019, East Bay Community Energy (EBCE) signed a ten-year contract to receive resource adequacy capacity from the planned development of a 20 MW battery ESS at our Oakland Power Plant site in California. In April 2020, the project received necessary approvals from EBCE and from Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E). The contract was amended to increase the capacity of the planned development to a 36.25 MW battery ESS. In April 2020, the concurrent local area reliability service agreement to ensure grid reliability as part of the Oakland Clean Energy Initiative was signed and sent to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) for approval, which is expected prior to the second quarter of 2021. The battery ESS project is expected to enter commercial operations by January 2022.

Moss Landing— In June 2018, we announced that, subject to approval by the CPUC, we would enter into a 20-year resource adequacy contract with PG&E to develop a 300 MW battery ESS at our Moss Landing Power Plant site in California (Moss Landing Phase I). PG&E filed its application with the CPUC in June 2018 and the CPUC approved the resource adequacy contract in November 2018. At December 31, 2020, we had accumulated approximately $370 million in construction work-in-process for Moss Landing Phase I. Under the contract, PG&E will pay us a fixed monthly resource adequacy payment, while we will receive the energy revenues and incur the costs from dispatching and charging the ESS. Moss Landing Phase I began test operations in December 2020 and is expected to be fully operational by April 2021. PG&E filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in January 2019. In November 2019, the bankruptcy court approved PG&E's motion requesting approval of the assumption of the resource adequacy contract subject to the CPUC approving the terms of an amendment to the resource adequacy contract, and the CPUC approved the terms of the amendment in January 2020. PG&E emerged from bankruptcy protection in July 2020.

In April 2016, Luminant purchased all ofMay 2020, we announced that, subject to approval by the membership interestsCPUC, we would enter into a 10-year resource adequacy contract with PG&E to develop an additional 100 MW battery ESS at our Moss Landing Power Plant site (Moss Landing Phase II). PG&E filed its application with the CPUC in La Frontera,May 2020 and the indirect owner of two combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) natural gas-fueled generation facilities representing nearly 3,000 MW of capacity locatedCPUC approved the resource adequacy contract in ERCOT, from a subsidiary of NextEra Energy, Inc. (the Lamar and Forney Acquisition). The aggregate purchase price wasAugust 2020. At December 31, 2020, we had accumulated approximately $1.313 billion, which included the repayment of approximately $950$29 million of existing project financing indebtedness of La Frontera at closing, plus approximately $236 millionin construction work-in-process for cash and net working capital. The purchase price was funded by cash-on-hand and additional borrowings under our Predecessor's DIP Facility totaling $1.1 billion. After completing the acquisition, we repaid approximately $230 million of borrowings under our Predecessor's DIP Revolving Credit Facility primarily utilizing cash acquiredMoss Landing Phase II. We anticipate Moss Landing Phase II will commence commercial operations in the transaction. La Fronterathird quarter of 2021.
111
Table of Contents

4.RETIREMENT OF GENERATION FACILITIES

2020 Announcements

In December 2020, we announced our intention to retire 2 natural gas facilities in Texas due to their age, cost profile and its subsidiaries were subsidiary guarantors under our Predecessor's DIP Roll Facilitiessmall scale, as well as low power prices, limited operational windows and onsubstantial costs to repair, maintain and upgrade the Effective Date, became subsidiary guarantors under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities (see Note 14).facilities.

Predecessor Purchase Accounting — The Lamar and Forney Acquisition was accounted for in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations (ASC 805), with identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed recorded at their estimated fair values on the acquisition date.


To fair value the acquired property, plant and equipment, we used a discounted cash flow analysis, classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy levels (see Note 17). This discounted cash flow model was created for each generation facility based on its remaining useful life. The discounted cash flow model included gross margin forecasts for each power generation facility determined using forward commodity market prices obtained from long-term forecasts. We also used management's forecasts of generation output, operations and maintenance expense, SG&A and capital expenditures. The resulting cash flows, estimated based upon the age of the assets, efficiency, location and useful life, were then discounted using plant specific discount rates of approximately 9%.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the allocation of the purchase price to the fair value amounts recognized for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed related to the Lamar and Forney Acquisition as of the acquisition date. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, the working capital adjustment included in the purchase price was finalized between the parties, and the purchase price allocation was completed.
Cash paid to seller at close $603
Net working capital adjustments (4)
Consideration paid to seller 599
Cash paid to repay project financing at close 950
Total cash paid related to acquisition $1,549
Cash and cash equivalents $210
Property, plant and equipment — net 1,316
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets 47
Other assets 44
Total assets acquired 1,617
Commodity and other derivative contractual liabilities 53
Trade accounts payable and other liabilities 15
Total liabilities assumed 68
Identifiable net assets acquired $1,549

The Lamar and Forney Acquisition did not result in the recording of goodwill since the purchase price did not exceed the fair value of the net assets acquired.

Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information — The following unaudited pro forma financial information for the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016 assumes that the Lamar and Forney Acquisition occurred on January 1, 2016. The unaudited pro forma financial information is provided for information purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the Lamar and Forney Acquisition been completed on January 1, 2016, nor is the unaudited pro forma financial information indicative of future results of operations.
 Predecessor
 Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016
Revenues$4,116
Net income (loss)$22,835

The unaudited pro forma financial information includes adjustments for incremental depreciation as a result of the fair value determination of the net assets acquired and interest expense on borrowings under our Predecessor's DIP Roll Facilities.


4.NameRETIREMENT OF GENERATION FACILITIESLocationISO/RTOFuel TypeNet Generation Capacity (MW)Dates Units Retired or
Expected Retirement Date
WhartonBoling, TXERCOTNatural Gas83November 30, 2020
TrinidadTrinidad, TXERCOTNatural Gas244By April 30, 2021
Total327


In September 2020 and December 2020, we announced our intention to retire all of our remaining coal generation facilities in Illinois and Ohio, 1 coal generation facility in Texas and 1 natural gas facility in Illinois no later than year-end 2027 due to economic challenges, including incremental expenditures that would be required to comply with the CCR rule and ELG rule (see Note 13), and in furtherance of our efforts to significantly reduce our carbon footprint. Expected plant retirement expenses of $43 million, driven by severance cost, were accrued in the year ended December 31, 2020 in operating costs of our Sunset segment. Operational results for plants with planned retirements are included in our Sunset segment beginning in the quarter when a retirement plan is announced. See Note 21 for discussion of impairments recorded in connection with these announcements.
NameLocationISO/RTOFuel TypeNet Generation Capacity (MW)Expected Retirement Date (a)
BaldwinBaldwin, ILMISOCoal1,185By the end of 2025
Coleto CreekGoliad, TXERCOTCoal650By the end of 2027
JoppaJoppa, ILMISOCoal802By the end of 2025
JoppaJoppa, ILMISONatural Gas221By the end of 2025
KincaidKincaid, ILPJMCoal1,108By the end of 2027
Miami FortNorth Bend, OHPJMCoal1,020By the end of 2027
NewtonNewton, ILMISO/PJMCoal615By the end of 2027
ZimmerMoscow, OHPJMCoal1,300By the end of 2027
Total6,901
____________
(a)Generation facilities may retire earlier than expected dates if economic or other conditions dictate.

2019 Announcements

In September 2019, we announced the settlement of a lawsuit alleging violations of opacity and particulate matter limits at our Edwards facility in Bartonville, Illinois. As part of the settlement, which was approved by the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois in November 2019, we will retire the Edwards facility by the end of 2022 (see Note 13). In August 2019, we announced the planned retirement of 4 additional power plants in Illinois with a total installed nameplate generation capacity of 2,068 MW. We retired these units due to changes in the Illinois multi-pollutant standard rule (MPS rule) that require us to retire approximately 2,000 MW of generation capacity (see Note 13). In light of the provisions of the Federal Power Act and the FERC regulations thereunder, the affected subsidiaries of Vistra identified the retired units by analyzing the economics of each of our Illinois plants and designating the least economic units for retirement. Expected plant retirement expenses of $47 million, driven by severance costs, were accrued in the year ended December 31, 2019 and were included primarily in operating costs of our Asset Closure segment. In August 2019, we remeasured our pension and OPEB plans resulting in an increase to the benefit obligation liability of $21 million, pretax other comprehensive loss of $18 million and curtailment expense of $3 million recognized as other deductions in our consolidated statements of operations. The following table details the units in Illinois totaling 2,653 MW that have been or will be retired. Operational results for the four retired plants identified below are included in the Asset Closure segment, which is engaged in the decommissioning and reclamation of retired plants and mines. Operational results for the Edwards facility are included in the Sunset segment.
112
Table of Contents

NameLocationISO/RTOFuel TypeNet Generation Capacity (MW)Dates Units Retired or
Expected Retirement Date
CoffeenCoffeen, ILMISOCoal915 November 1, 2019
Duck CreekCanton, ILMISOCoal425 December 15, 2019
HavanaHavana, ILMISOCoal434 November 1, 2019
HennepinHennepin, ILMISOCoal294 November 1, 2019
EdwardsBartonville, ILMISOCoal585 By the end of 2022
Total2,653 

2018 Announcements

In August 2018, we filed a notice of suspension of operation with PJM and other mandatory regulatory notifications related to the retirement of our 51 MW Northeastern Power Company waste coal facility in McAddo, Pennsylvania.McAdoo, Pennsylvania (Northeastern Facility). We decided to retire this facilitythe Northeastern Facility due to its uneconomic operations and financial outlook. Following the receipt of regulatory approvals, the facilityNortheastern Facility was retired in October 2018. The decision to retire this facilitythe Northeastern Facility did not result in a material impact to the financial statements, and the operational results of this facilitythe Northeastern Facility are included in our Asset Closure segment.


TwoNaN of our non-operated, jointly held power plants acquired in the Merger, for which our proportional generation capacity was 883 MW, were retired in May 2018. These units were retired as previously scheduled. No gain or loss was recorded in conjunction with the retirement of these units, and the operational results of these facilities are included in our Asset Closure segment. The following table details the units retired.
NameLocationISO/RTOFuel TypeNet Generation Capacity (MW)Ownership InterestDate Units Retired
KillenManchester, OhioPJMCoal204 33%May 31, 2018
StuartAberdeen, OhioPJMCoal679 39%May 24, 2018
Total883 
Name Location Fuel Type Net Generation Capacity (MW) Ownership Interest Date Units Taken Offline
Killen Manchester, Ohio Coal 204
 33% May 31, 2018
Stuart Aberdeen, Ohio Coal 679
 39% May 24, 2018
Total     883
    


In January and February 2018, we retired three3 power plants in Texas with a total installed nameplate generation capacity of 4,167 MW. We decided to retire these units because they were projected to be uneconomic based on then current market conditions and would have faced significant environmental costs associated with operating such units. In the case of the Sandow units, the decision also reflected the execution of a contract termination agreement pursuant to which the Company and Alcoa agreed to an early settlement of a long-standing power and mining agreement. Expected retirement expenses were accrued in the third and fourth quarter of 2017 and, as a result, no retirement expenses were recorded related to these facilities in the year ended December 31, 2018. The operational results of these facilities are included in our Asset Closure segment. The following table details the units retired.
NameLocation (all in the state of Texas)ISO/RTOFuel TypeInstalled Nameplate Generation Capacity (MW)Date Units Retired
MonticelloTitus CountyERCOTLignite/Coal1,880 January 4, 2018
SandowMilam CountyERCOTLignite1,137 January 11, 2018
Big BrownFreestone CountyERCOTLignite/Coal1,150 February 12, 2018
Total4,167 

113
Name Location (all in the state of Texas) Fuel Type Installed Nameplate Generation Capacity (MW) Number of Units Date Units Taken Offline
Monticello Titus County Lignite/Coal 1,880
 3 January 4, 2018
Sandow Milam County Lignite 1,137
 2 January 11, 2018
Big Brown Freestone County Lignite/Coal 1,150
 2 February 12, 2018
Total     4,167
 7  
Table of Contents

5.REVENUE
In September and October 2017, we decided to retire
The following tables disaggregate our Monticello, Sandow and Big Brown plants and a related mine which suppliesrevenue by major source:
Year Ended December 31, 2020
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset ClosureEliminationsConsolidated
Revenue from contracts with customers:
Retail energy charge in ERCOT$5,813 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,813 
Retail energy charge in Northeast/Midwest2,406 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,406 
Wholesale generation revenue from ISO/RTO0 475 310 124 473 1 0 1,383 
Capacity revenue from ISO/RTO (a)0 0 (52)0 164 0 0 112 
Revenue from other wholesale contracts0 226 668 54 187 1 0 1,136 
Total revenue from contracts with customers8,219 701 926 178 824 2 0 10,850 
Other revenues:
Intangible amortization(5)0 2 0 (21)0 0 (24)
Hedging and other revenues (b)56 416 (108)101 151 1 0 617 
Affiliate sales0 2,999 1,595 3 298 0 (4,895)0 
Total other revenues51 3,415 1,489 104 428 1 (4,895)593 
Total revenues$8,270 $4,116 $2,415 $282 $1,252 $3 $(4,895)$11,443 
____________
(a)Represents net capacity sold (purchased) in each ISO/RTO. The East segment includes net purchases of capacity in the Sandow plants. Management had previously announced its decisions to retire mines which supply the Monticello and Big Brown plants. The Monticello and Sandow plants were retired in JanuaryPJM market and the Big Brown plantSunset segment includes net sales of capacity in February 2018. the PJM market.
(b)Includes $164 million of unrealized net gains from mark-to-market valuations of commodity positions. See Note 20 for unrealized net gains (losses) by segment.


Year Ended December 31, 2019
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset ClosureEliminationsConsolidated
Revenue from contracts with customers:
Retail energy charge in ERCOT$4,983 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,983 
Retail energy charge in Northeast/Midwest1,818 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,818 
Wholesale generation revenue from ISO/RTO0 1,477 629 193 751 194 0 3,244 
Capacity revenue from ISO/RTO0 0 170 0 197 11 0 378 
Revenue from other wholesale contracts0 264 702 9 147 2 0 1,124 
Total revenue from contracts with customers6,801 1,741 1,501 202 1,095 207 0 11,547 
Other revenues:
Intangible amortization(15)0 (4)4 (17)0 0 (32)
Hedging and other revenues (a)86 (250)37 132 247 42 0 294 
Affiliate sales0 2,345 1,256 0 277 92 (3,970)0 
Total other revenues71 2,095 1,289 136 507 134 (3,970)262 
Total revenues$6,872 $3,836 $2,790 $338 $1,602 $341 $(3,970)$11,809 
____________
(a)Includes $682 million of unrealized net gains from mark-to-market valuations of commodity positions. See Note 20 for unrealized net gains (losses) by segment.
114
Table of Contents


Year Ended December 31, 2018
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset ClosureEliminationsConsolidated
Revenue from contracts with customers:
Retail energy charge in ERCOT$4,426 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,426 
Retail energy charge in Northeast/Midwest1,123 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,123 
Wholesale generation revenue from ISO/RTO0 1,049 867 167 825 218 0 3,126 
Capacity revenue from ISO/RTO0 0 376 30 258 34 0 698 
Revenue from other wholesale contracts0 214 67 6 137 0 0 424 
Total revenue from contracts with customers5,549 1,263 1,310 203 1,220 252 0 9,797 
Other revenues:
Intangible amortization(26)(1)(9)0 (7)0 0 (43)
Hedging and other revenues (a)74 (387)16 5 (214)(106)2 (610)
Affiliate sales0 1,622 578 0 184 225 (2,609)0 
Total other revenues48 1,234 585 5 (37)119 (2,607)(653)
Total revenues$5,597 $2,497 $1,895 $208 $1,183 $371 $(2,607)$9,144 
____________
(a)Includes $380 million of unrealized net losses from mark-to-market valuations of commodity positions. See Note 20 for unrealized net gains (losses) by segment.

Retail Energy Charges

Revenue is recognized when electricity is delivered to our customers in an amount that we expect to invoice for volumes delivered or services provided. Sales tax is excluded from revenue. Payment terms vary from 15 to 60 days from invoice date. Revenue is recognized over-time using the output method based on kilowatt hours delivered. Energy charges are delivered as a series of distinct services and are accounted for as a single performance obligation.

Energy sales and services that have been delivered but not billed by period end are estimated. Accrued unbilled revenues are based on estimates of customer usage since the date of the last meter reading provided by the independent system operators or electric distribution companies. Estimated amounts are adjusted when actual usage is known and billed.

As contracts for retail electricity can be for multi-year periods, the Company has performance obligations under these contracts that have not yet been satisfied. These performance obligations have transaction prices that are both fixed and variable, and that vary based on the contract duration and customer type. For the fixed price contracts, the amount of any unsatisfied performance obligations will vary based on customer usage, which will depend on factors such as weather and customer activity and therefore it is not practicable to estimate such amounts.

Wholesale Generation Revenue from ISOs/RTOs

Revenue is recognized when volumes are delivered to the ISO/RTO. Revenue is recognized over time using the output method based on kilowatt hours delivered and cash is settled within 10 days of invoicing. Vistra operates as a market participant within ERCOT, PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO, MISO and CAISO and expects to continue to remain under contract with each ISO/RTO indefinitely. Wholesale generation revenues are delivered as a series of distinct services and are accounted for as a single performance obligation. When electricity is sold to and purchased from the same ISO/RTO in the same period, the excess of the amount sold over the amount purchased is reflected in wholesale generation revenues.

115
Table of Contents
Capacity Revenue From ISO/RTO

We offer generation capacity into competitive ISO/RTO auctions in exchange for revenue from awarded capacity offers. Capacity ensures installed generation and demand response is available to satisfy system integrity and reliability requirements. Capacity revenues are recognized when the performance obligation is satisfied ratably over time as our power generation facilities stand ready to deliver power to the customer. Penalties are assessed by the ISO/RTO against generation facilities if the facility is not available during the capacity period. The penalties are recorded as a chargereduction to revenue. When capacity is sold to and purchased from the same ISO/RTO in the same period, the excess of approximately $206the amount sold over the amount purchased is reflected in capacity revenue.

Revenue from Other Wholesale Contracts

Other wholesale contracts include other revenue activity with the ISO/RTO, such as ancillary services, auction revenue, neutrality revenue and revenue from nonaffiliated retail electric providers, municipalities or other wholesale counterparties. Revenue is recognized when the service is performed. Revenue is recognized over time using the output method based on kilowatt hours delivered or other applicable measurements, and cash settles shortly after invoicing. Vistra operates as a market participant within ERCOT, PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO, MISO and CAISO and expects to continue to remain under contract with each ISO/RTO indefinitely. Other wholesale contracts are delivered as a series of distinct services and are accounted for as a single performance obligation.

Other Revenues

Some of our contracts for the sale of electricity meet the definition of a derivative under the accounting standards related to derivative instruments. Revenue from derivative contracts is not considered revenue from contracts with customers under the accounting standards related to revenue. Our revenue from the sale of electricity under derivative contracts, including the impact of unrealized gains or losses on those contracts, is reported in the table above as hedging and other revenues. We have classified all sales to affiliates that are eliminated in consolidation as other revenues in the table above.

Contract and Other Customer Acquisition Costs

We defer costs to acquire retail contracts and amortize these costs over the expected life of the contract. The expected life of a retail contract is calculated using historical attrition rates, which we believe to be an accurate indicator of future attrition rates. The deferred acquisition and contract cost balance as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 and January 1, 2018 was $80 million, $53 million, $38 million and $22 million, respectively. The amortization related to these costs during the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 totaled $46 million and $21 million, respectively, recorded as SG&A expenses, and $7 million and $9 million, respectively, recorded as a reduction to operating revenues in 2017the consolidated statements of operations.

Practical Expedients

The vast majority of revenues are recognized under the right to invoice practical expedient, which allows us to recognize revenue in the same amount that we have a right to invoice our customers. Unbilled revenues are recorded based on the volumes delivered and services provided to the customers at the end of the period, using the right to invoice practical expedient. We have elected to not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts with variable consideration for which we recognize revenue using the right to invoice practical expedient. We use the portfolio approach in evaluating similar customer contracts with similar performance obligations. Sales taxes are not included in revenue.

Performance Obligations

As of December 31, 2020, we have future performance obligations that are unsatisfied, or partially unsatisfied, relating to capacity auction volumes awarded through capacity auctions held by the ISO/RTO or contracts with customers. Therefore, an obligation exists as of the date of the results of the respective ISO/RTO capacity auction or the contract execution date. These obligations total $834 million, $496 million, $121 million, $38 million and $12 million that will be recognized in the years ending December 31, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025, respectively, and $7 million thereafter. Capacity revenues are recognized as capacity is made available to the related ISOs/RTOs or counterparties.

116
Table of Contents
Accounts Receivable

The following table presents trade accounts receivable (net of allowance for uncollectible accounts) relating to both contracts with customers and other activities:
December 31,
20202019
Trade accounts receivable from contracts with customers — net$1,169 $1,246 
Other trade accounts receivable — net110 119 
Total trade accounts receivable — net$1,279 $1,365 



6.GOODWILL AND IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Goodwill

The following table provides information regarding our goodwill balance. There have been no impairments of goodwill since Emergence.

Balance at December 31, 2018$2,068 
Measurement period adjustments recorded in connection with the Merger14 
Goodwill recorded in connection with the Crius Transaction257 
Goodwill recorded in connection with the Ambit Transaction214 
Balance at December 31, 20192,553 
Measurement period adjustments recorded in connection with the Crius Transaction(14)
Measurement period adjustments recorded in connection with the Ambit Transaction44 
Balance at December 31, 2020$2,583 

At December 31, 2020, the goodwill balance of $2.583 billion consisted of the following:

•$1.907 billion arose in connection with our application of fresh start reporting at Emergence and was allocated entirely to our Retail reporting unit. Of the goodwill recorded at Emergence, $1.686 billion is deductible for tax purposes over 15 years on a straight-line basis.
•$175 million arose in connection with the Merger, of which $122 million was allocated to our Texas Generation reporting unit and $53 million was allocated to our Retail reporting unit. NaN of the goodwill related to the retirements, including employee-related severance costs, non-cash chargesMerger is deductible for writing off materials inventorytax purposes.
•$243 million of goodwill arose in connection with the Crius Transaction and capitalized improvementswas allocated entirely to our Retail reporting unit. NaN of the goodwill related to the Crius Transaction is deductible for tax purposes.
•$258 million of goodwill arose in connection with the Ambit Transaction and was allocated entirely to our Retail reporting unit. The goodwill related to the Ambit Transaction is deductible for tax purposes over 15 years on a straight-line basis.

Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are required to be evaluated for impairment at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an impairment may exist. We have selected October 1 as our annual goodwill test date. On the most recent goodwill testing date, we applied qualitative factors and determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our Retail and Texas Generation reporting units exceeded their carrying value at October 1, 2020. Significant qualitative factors evaluated included reporting unit financial performance and market multiples, cost factors, customer attrition and changes toin reporting unit book value.

117
Table of Contents
Identifiable Intangible Assets and Liabilities

Identifiable intangible assets are comprised of the timing andfollowing:
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Identifiable Intangible AssetGross
Carrying
Amount		Accumulated
Amortization		NetGross
Carrying
Amount		Accumulated
Amortization		Net
Retail customer relationship$2,082 $1,434 $648 $2,078 $1,151 $927 
Software and other technology-related assets414 186 228 341 125 216 
Retail and wholesale contracts272 204 68 315 182 133 
Contractual service agreements (a)51 1 50 59 5 54 
Other identifiable intangible assets (b)96 19 77 40 15 25 
Total identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization$2,915 $1,844 1,071 $2,833 $1,478 1,355 
Retail trade names (not subject to amortization)1,374 1,391 
Mineral interests (not currently subject to amortization)1 2 
Total identifiable intangible assets$2,446 $2,748 
____________
(a)At December 31, 2020, amounts of asset retirement obligations for mining and plant-related reclamation at these facilities. The charge, all of which related to our Asset Closure segment, was recordedcontractual service agreements that have become liabilities due to operatingamortization of the economic impacts of the intangibles have been removed from both the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization.
(b)Includes mining development costs and impairmentenvironmental allowances (emissions allowances and renewable energy certificates).

Identifiable intangible liabilities are comprised of long-livedthe following:
Year Ended December 31,
Identifiable Intangible Liability20202019
Contractual service agreements$129 $110 
Purchase and sale of power and capacity87 100 
Fuel and transportation purchase contracts73 76 
Total identifiable intangible liabilities$289 $286 

118
Table of Contents
Expense related to finite-lived identifiable intangible assets and liabilities (including the classification in ourthe consolidated statements of consolidated income (loss). In addition, we will continue the ongoing reclamation work at the plants' mines.operations) consisted of:

Identifiable Intangible Assets and LiabilitiesConsolidated Statements of OperationsRemaining useful lives of identifiable intangible assets at December 31,
2020 (weighted average in years)		Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Retail customer relationshipDepreciation and amortization3$283 $275 $304 
Software and other technology-related assetsDepreciation and amortization473 61 62 
Retail and wholesale contracts/purchase and sale/fuel and transportation contractsOperating revenues/fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees317 23 43 
Other identifiable intangible assetsOperating revenues/fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees/depreciation and amortization5223 148 58 
Total intangible asset expense (a)$596 $507 $467 
In October 2017, the Company____________
(a)Amounts recorded in depreciation and Alcoa entered into a contract termination agreement pursuant to which the parties agreed to an early settlement of a long-standing poweramortization totaled $360 million, $340 million and mining agreement. In consideration$370 million for the early termination, Alcoa madeyears ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 respectively. Amounts exclude contractual services agreements. Amounts include all expenses associated with environmental allowances including expenses accrued to comply with emissions allowance programs and renewable portfolio standards which are presented in fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees on our consolidated statements of operations. Emissions allowance obligations are accrued as associated electricity is generated and renewable energy certificate obligations are accrued as retail electricity delivery occurs.

The following is a payment to Luminant of approximately $238 million in October 2017. The contract termination and related payment did not result in a material gain or loss. The contract had been important to the overall economic viabilitydescription of the Sandow plant.

Regulatory Review — As part ofseparately identifiable intangible assets. In connection with fresh start reporting, the retirement process, Luminant filed notices with ERCOT, which triggered a reliability review regarding such proposed retirements. In October and November 2017, ERCOT determinedMerger, the units were not needed for reliability,Crius Transaction and the unitsAmbit Transaction, the intangible assets were taken offline in January and February 2018.



5.    EMERGENCE FROM CHAPTER 11 CASES

On the Petition Date, EFH Corp. and the substantial majorityadjusted based on their estimated fair value as of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including EFIH, EFCH and TCEH, but excluding the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities, filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. On the Effective Date, the TCEH DebtorsMerger Date, the Crius Acquisition Date and the Contributed EFH Debtors completedAmbit Acquisition Date, respectively, based on observable prices or estimates of fair value using valuation models.

•Retail customer relationship — Retail customer relationship intangible asset represents the fair value of our non-contracted retail customer base, including residential and business customers, and is being amortized using an accelerated method based on historical customer attrition rates and reflecting the expected pattern in which economic benefits are realized over their reorganization underestimated useful life.

•Retail trade names — Our retail trade name intangible asset represents the Bankruptcy Codefair value of our retail brands, including the trade names of TXU EnergyTM, Ambit Energy, 4Change EnergyTM, Homefield Energy, Dynegy Energy Services, TriEagle Energy, Public Power and emerged fromU.S. Gas & Electric, and was determined to be an indefinite-lived asset not subject to amortization. This intangible asset is evaluated for impairment at least annually in accordance with accounting guidance related to goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets. Significant assumptions included within the Chapter 11 Casesdevelopment of the fair value estimate include estimated gross margins for future periods and implied royalty rates. On the most recent testing date, we determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our retail trade name intangible asset exceeded its carrying value at October 1, 2020.

•Retail and wholesale contracts/purchase and sale contracts — These intangible assets represent the value of various retail and wholesale contracts and purchase and sale contracts. The contracts were identified as subsidiarieseither assets or liabilities based on the respective fair values as of Vistra Energy.

Separation of Vistra Energy from EFH Corp. and its Subsidiaries

Upon the Effective Date, the Merger Date, the Crius Acquisition Date or the Ambit Acquisition Date utilizing prevailing market prices for commodities or services compared to the fixed prices contained in these agreements. The intangible assets or liabilities are being amortized in relation to the economic terms of the related contracts.

119
Table of Contents
•Contractual service agreements — Our acquired contractual service agreements represent the estimated fair value of favorable or unfavorable contract obligations with respect to long-term plant maintenance agreements, rail transportation agreements and rail car leases, and are being amortized based on the expected usage of the service agreements over the contract terms. The majority of the plant maintenance services relate to capital improvements and the related amortization of the plant maintenance agreements is recorded to property, plant and equipment. Amortization of rail transportation and rail car lease agreements is recorded to fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees.

Estimated Amortization of Identifiable Intangible Assets and Liabilities

As of December 31, 2020, the estimated aggregate amortization expense of identifiable intangible assets and liabilities for each of the next five fiscal years is as shown below.
YearEstimated Amortization Expense
2021$276 
2022$183 
2023$128 
2024$78 
2025$54 

7.INCOME TAXES

Vistra Energy separated from EFH Corp. pursuantfiles a U.S. federal income tax return that includes the results of its consolidated subsidiaries. Vistra is the corporate parent of the Vistra consolidated group. Pursuant to a tax-free spin-off transactionapplicable U.S. Department of the Treasury regulations and published guidance of the IRS, corporations that was partare members of a seriesconsolidated group have joint and several liability for the taxes of transactionssuch group.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

The components of our income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Current:
U.S. Federal$(5)$(1)$(13)
State41 10 30 
Total current36 9 17 
Deferred:
U.S. Federal171 260 (8)
State59 21 (54)
Total deferred230 281 (62)
Total$266 $290 $(45)

120
Table of Contents
Reconciliation of income taxes computed at the U.S. federal statutory rate to income tax expense (benefit) recorded:
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Income (loss) before income taxes$890 $1,216 $(101)
U.S. federal statutory rate21 %21 %21 %
Income taxes at the U.S. federal statutory rate187 255 (20)
Nondeductible TRA accretion(7)5 8 
State tax, net of federal benefit32 48 22 
Federal and State return to provision adjustment13 (17)(12)
Remeasurement of historical Vistra deferred taxes for expanded state footprint0 0 (54)
Effect of refundable minimum tax credits no longer subject to sequestration0 0 (15)
Nondeductible compensation0 3 8 
Nondeductible transaction costs0 2 3 
Equity awards0 (4)(3)
Valuation allowance on state NOLs41 13 20 
Lignite depletion(3)(6)0 
Texas gross margin amended return0 (3)0 
Other3 (6)(2)
Income tax expense (benefit)$266 $290 $(45)
Effective tax rate29.9 %23.8 %44.6 %

Deferred Income Tax Balances

Deferred income taxes provided for temporary differences based on tax laws in effect at December 31, 2020 and 2019 are as follows:
December 31,
20202019
Noncurrent Deferred Income Tax Assets
Tax credit carryforwards$75 $73 
Loss carryforwards953 921 
Identifiable intangible assets293 214 
Long-term debt19 257 
Employee benefit obligations129 112 
Commodity contracts and interest rate swaps96 108 
Other47 43 
Total deferred tax assets$1,612 $1,728 
Noncurrent Deferred Income Tax Liabilities
Property, plant and equipment632 554 
Total deferred tax liabilities632 554 
Valuation allowance143 110 
Net Deferred Income Tax Asset$837 $1,064 

121
Table of Contents
At December 31, 2020, we had total deferred tax assets of approximately $837 million that includedwere substantially comprised of book and tax basis differences related to our generation and mining property, plant and equipment, as well as federal and state net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards. Our deferred tax assets were significantly impacted by the Merger. For the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized a taxable component. The taxable portionpartial valuation allowance of $32 million on the transaction generated a taxable gain that resulted in no regular tax liability due to available net operating loss carryforwards related largely to Illinois and New York due to forecasted expiration. As of EFH Corp. December 31, 2019, we assessed the need for a valuation allowance related to our deferred tax asset and considered both positive and negative evidence related to the likelihood of realization of the deferred tax assets. In connection with our analysis, we concluded that it is more likely than not that the federal deferred tax assets will be fully utilized by future taxable income, and thus no valuation allowance was required.

At December 31, 2020, we had $3.4 billion pre-tax net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards for federal income tax purposes that will begin to expire in 2032. At December 31, 2020, we had 0 remaining AMT credits refundable through the TCJA available.

The transaction did resultincome tax effects of the components included in accumulated other comprehensive income totaled a net deferred tax asset of $5 million and $3 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) and Final Section 163(j) Regulations

In response to the global pandemic related to COVID-19, the CARES Act was signed into law in March 2020. The CARES Act provides numerous relief provisions for corporate taxpayers, including modification of the utilization limitations on net operating losses, favorable expansion of the deduction for business interest expense under IRC Section 163(j) (Section 163(j)), the ability to accelerate timing of refundable AMT credits and the temporary suspension of certain payment requirements for the employer portion of social security taxes. Additionally, the final Section 163(j) regulations were issued in July 2020 and provided a critical correction to the proposed regulations with respect to the computation of adjusted taxable income. Vistra received $64 million in 2020 relating to the acceleration of AMT refunds and an alternative minimumapproximate $350 million increase in interest expense deduction over the 2019 and 2020 tax liability estimatedyears under the cumulative impact of these final laws and regulation pertaining to Section 163(j). Additionally, Vistra expects to receive an approximate $305 million increase in interest expense deduction in the 2021 tax year under the final Section 163(j) regulations. We do not anticipate a material impact to the effective tax rate from these impacts. Vistra is also utilizing the CARES Act payroll deferral mechanism to defer the payment of approximately $22 million from 2020 to 2021 and 2022.

Liability for Uncertain Tax Positions

Accounting guidance related to uncertain tax positions requires that all tax positions subject to uncertainty be reviewed and assessed with recognition and measurement of the tax benefit based on a "more-likely-than-not" standard with respect to the ultimate outcome, regardless of whether this assessment is favorable or unfavorable.

We classify interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as current income tax expense. The amounts were immaterial for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018. The following table summarizes the changes to the uncertain tax positions, reported in accumulated deferred income taxes and other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Balance at beginning of period, excluding interest and penalties$126 $39 $0 
Additions allocated in the Merger0 0 39 
Additions based on tax positions related to prior years3 3 0 
Reductions based on tax positions related to prior years(90)0 0 
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year0 87 0 
Settlements with taxing authorities0 (3)0 
Balance at end of period, excluding interest and penalties$39 $126 $39 

122
Table of Contents
Vistra and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in U.S. federal and state jurisdictions and are expected to be approximately $14 million payablesubject to examinations by EFH Corp. to the IRS. Pursuant to the Tax Matters Agreement, Vistra Energy had an obligation to reimburse EFH Corp. 50% of the estimated alternative minimum tax, and approximately $7 million was reimbursed during the three months ended June 30, 2017. In October 2017, the 2016 federal tax return that included the results of EFCH, EFIH, Oncor Holdings and TCEH was filed with the IRS and resultedother taxing authorities. The IRS has notified us of its intention to open an audit regarding the 2018 tax year. Crius is currently under audit by the IRS for the tax years 2015 and 2016. Uncertain tax positions totaling $39 million at December 31, 2020 reflect the final regulations under Section 163(j) that were released in a $3 million payment from EFH Corp. to Vistra Energy. The spin-off transaction resulted in Vistra Energy, including the TCEH DebtorsJuly 2020, and the Contributed EFH Debtors, no longer being an affiliate of EFH Corp. and its subsidiaries.

Separation Agreement

On the Effective Date, EFH Corp., Vistra Energy and a subsidiary of Vistra Energy entered into a separation agreement that provided for, among other things, the transfer of certainwe have adjusted deferred tax assets and liabilities by EFH Corp., EFCH and TCEH to Vistra Energy. Among other things, EFH Corp., EFCH and/or TCEH,$87 million in the year ended December 31, 2020. Uncertain tax positions totaling $39 million at December 31, 2018 arose in connection with the Merger as applicable, (a) transferred the TCEH Debtors and certain contracts and assets (and related liabilities) primarily related to the business of the TCEH Debtors to Vistra Energy, (b) transferred sponsorship of certain employee benefit plans (including related assets), programs and policies to a subsidiary of Vistra Energy and (c) assigned certain employment agreements from EFH Corp. and certain of the Contributed EFH Debtors to a subsidiary of Vistra Energy.discussed in Note 2.


Tax Matters AgreementRevenue from Other Wholesale Contracts


On the Effective Date, Vistra Energy and EFH Corp. entered into the Tax Matters Agreement, which provides for the allocation of certain taxes among the parties and for certain rights and obligations related to, amongOther wholesale contracts include other things, the filing of tax returns, resolutions of tax audits and preserving the tax-free nature of the spin-off.

Settlement Agreement

The Debtors, the Sponsor Group, certain settling TCEH first lien creditors, certain settling TCEH second lien creditors, certain settling TCEH unsecured creditors and the official committee of unsecured creditors of the TCEH Debtors entered into a settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement) in August 2015 (as amended in September 2015 and approved by the Bankruptcy Court in December 2015) to settle, among other things, (a) intercompany claims among the Debtors, (b) claims and causes of actions against holders of first lien claims against TCEH and the agents under the TCEH Senior Secured Facilities, (c) claims and causes of action against holders of interests in EFH Corp. and certain related entities and (d) claims and causes of action against each of the Debtors' current and former directors, the Sponsor Group, managers and officers and other related entities.

Tax Matters

In July 2016, EFH Corp. received a private letter ruling from the IRS in connection with our emergence from bankruptcy, which provides, among other things, for certain rulings regarding the qualification of (a) the transfer of certain assets and ordinary course operating liabilities to Vistra Energy and (b) the distribution of the equity of Vistra Energy, the cash proceeds from Vistra Energy debt, the cash proceeds from the sale of preferred stock in a newly formed subsidiary of Vistra Energy, and the right to receive payments under a tax receivables agreement, to holders of TCEH first lien claims, as a reorganization qualifying for tax-free treatment.


Pre-Petition Claims

On the Effective Date, the TCEH Debtors (togetherrevenue activity with the Contributed EFH Debtors) emergedISO/RTO, such as ancillary services, auction revenue, neutrality revenue and revenue from the Chapter 11 Cases and discharged approximately $33.8 billion in LSTC. Initial distributions related to the allowed claims asserted against the TCEH Debtors and the Contributed EFH Debtors commenced subsequent to the Effective Date. As of December 31, 2018, the TCEH Debtors have approximately $52 million in escrow to (1) distribute to holders of currently contingent and/nonaffiliated retail electric providers, municipalities or disputed unsecured claims that become allowed and/or (2) make further distributions to holders of previously allowed unsecured claims, if applicable. Additionally, the TCEH Debtors have approximately $5 million in escrow to pay remaining professional fees incurred in the Chapter 11 Cases. The remaining contingent and/or disputed claims against the TCEH Debtors consist primarily of unsecured legal claims, including asbestos claims. These remaining claims and the related escrow balance for the claims are recorded in Vistra Energy's consolidated balance sheet as other current liabilities and current restricted cash, respectively. A small number of other disputed, de minimis claims that are asserted as being entitled to priority and/or against the Contributed EFH Debtors, if allowed, will be paid by Vistra Energy, but all non-priority unsecured claims, including asbestos claims arising before the Petition Date, will be satisfied solely from the approximately $52 million in escrow.

Predecessor Reorganization Items

Expenses and income directly associated with the Chapter 11 Cases are reported separately in the statements of consolidated income (loss) as reorganization items as required by ASC 852, Reorganizations. Reorganization items also included adjustments to reflect the carrying value of LSTC at their estimated allowed claim amounts, as such adjustments were determined. The following table presents reorganization items incurred in the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016 as reported in the statements of consolidated income (loss):
 Predecessor
 Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016
Gain on reorganization adjustments (Note 6)$(24,252)
Loss from the adoption of fresh start reporting2,013
Expenses related to legal advisory and representation services55
Expenses related to other professional consulting and advisory services39
Contract claims adjustments13
Other11
Total reorganization items$(22,121)


6.FRESH START REPORTING

As of the Effective Date, Vistra Energy applied fresh start reporting under the applicable provisions of ASC 852. In order to apply fresh-start reporting, ASC 852 requires two criteria to be satisfied: (1) that total post­ petition liabilities and allowed claims immediately before the date of confirmation of the Plan of Reorganization be in excess of reorganization value and (2) that holders of our Predecessor's voting shares immediately before confirmation of the Plan receive less than 50% of the voting shares of the emerging entity. Vistra Energy met both criteria. Under ASC 852, application of fresh start reporting is required on the date on which a plan of reorganization is confirmed by a bankruptcy court and all material conditions to the plan of reorganization are satisfied. All material conditions to the Plan of Reorganization were satisfied on the Effective Date, including the execution of the Spin-Off.

Reorganization Value

A third-party valuation specialist submitted a report to the Bankruptcy Court in July 2016 assuming an emergence from bankruptcy as of December 31, 2016. This report provided an estimated value range for the total Vistra Energy enterprise. Management selected an enterprise value within that range of $10.5 billion. The enterprise value submitted by the valuation specialist was based upon:

historical financial information of our Predecessor for recent years and interim periods;
certain internal financial and operating data of our Predecessor;
certain financial, tax and operational forecasts of Vistra Energy;
certain publicly available financial data for comparable companies to the operating business of Vistra Energy;
the Plan of Reorganization and related documents;
certain economic and industry information relevant to the operating business, and
other studies, analyses and inquiries.

The valuation analysis for Vistra Energy included (i) a discounted cash flow calculation and (ii) peer group company analysis. Equal weighting was assigned to the two methodologies, before adding the value of the tax basis step-up resulting from certain transactions pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, which was valued separately. The estimated future cash flows included annual forecasts through 2021. A terminal value was included in the discounted cash flow calculation using an exit multiple approach based on the cash flows of the final year of the forecast period.

The valuation analysis used a discount rate of approximately 7%. The determination of the discount rate takes into consideration the capital structure, credit ratings and current debt yields of comparable publicly traded companies as well as an estimate of return on equity that reflects historical market returns and current market volatility for the industry.

Although the Company believes the assumptions and estimates used by the valuation specialist to develop the enterprise value are reasonable and appropriate, different assumption and estimates could materially impact the analysis and resulting conclusions.

Under ASC 852, reorganization value is generally allocated, first, to identifiable tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets and liabilities, then any remaining excess reorganization value is allocated to goodwill. Vistra Energy estimates its reorganization value of assets at approximately $15.161 billion as of October 3, 2016, which consists of the following:
Business enterprise value$10,500
Cash excluded from business enterprise value1,594
Deferred asset related to prepaid capital lease obligation38
Current liabilities, excluding short-term portion of debt and capital leases1,123
Noncurrent, non-interest bearing liabilities1,906
Vistra Energy reorganization value of assets$15,161


Consolidated Balance Sheet

The adjustments to TCEH's October 3, 2016 consolidated balance sheet below include the impacts of the Plan of Reorganization and the adoption of fresh start reporting.
 October 3, 2016
 TCEH (Predecessor) (1) 
Reorganization
Adjustments (2)
 
Fresh Start
Adjustments
 Vistra Energy (Successor)
ASSETS           
Current assets:           
Cash and cash equivalents$1,829
 $(1,028) (3) $—
   $801
Restricted cash12
 131
 (4) —
   143
Trade accounts receivable — net750
 4
   —
   754
Advances to parents and affiliates of Predecessor78
 (78)   —
   —
Inventories374
 —
   (86) (17) 288
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets255
 —
   —
   255
Margin deposits related to commodity contracts42
 —
   —
   42
Other current assets47
 17
   3
   67
Total current assets3,387
 (954)   (83)   2,350
Restricted cash650
 —
   —
   650
Advance to parent and affiliates of Predecessor17
 (21)   4
   —
Investments1,038
 1
   9
 (18) 1,048
Property, plant and equipment — net10,359
 53
   (5,970) (19) 4,442
Goodwill152
 —
   1,755
 (27) 1,907
Identifiable intangible assets — net1,148
 4
   2,256
 (20) 3,408
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets73
 —
   (14)   59
Deferred income taxes—
 320
 (5) 730
 (21) 1,050
Other noncurrent assets51
 38
   158
 (22) 247
Total assets$16,875
 $(559)   $(1,155)   $15,161
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY           
Current liabilities:           
Long-term debt due currently$4
 $5
   $(1)   $8
Trade accounts payable402
 145
 (6) 3
   550
Trade accounts and other payables to affiliates of Predecessor152
 (152) (6) —
   —
Commodity and other derivative contractual liabilities125
 —
   —
   125
Margin deposits related to commodity contracts64
 —
   —
   64
Accrued income taxes12
 12
   —
   24
Accrued taxes other than income119
 4
   —
   123
Accrued interest110
 (109) (7) —
   1
Other current liabilities243
 170
 (8) 5
   418
Total current liabilities1,231
 75
   7
   1,313

 October 3, 2016
 TCEH (Predecessor) (1) 
Reorganization
Adjustments (2)
 
Fresh Start
Adjustments
 Vistra Energy (Successor)
Long-term debt, less amounts due currently—
 3,476
 (9) 151
 (23) 3,627
Borrowings under debtor-in-possession credit facilities3,387
 (3,387) (9) —
   —
Liabilities subject to compromise33,749
 (33,749) (10) —
   —
Commodity and other derivative contractual liabilities5
 —
   3
   8
Deferred income taxes256
 (256) (11) —
   —
Tax Receivable Agreement obligation—
 574
 (12) —
   574
Asset retirement obligations809
 —
   854
 (24) 1,663
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits1,018
 117
 (13) (900) (25) 235
Total liabilities40,455
 (33,150)   115
   7,420
Equity:           
Common stock—
 4
 (14) —
   4
Additional paid-in-capital—
 7,737
 (15) —
   7,737
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(32) 22
   10
 (26) —
Predecessor membership interests(23,548) 24,828
 (16) (1,280) (26) —
Total equity(23,580) 32,591
   (1,270)   7,741
Total liabilities and equity$16,875
 $(559)   $(1,155)   $15,161

(1)Represents the consolidated balance sheet of TCEH as of October 3, 2016.

Reorganization adjustments

(2)Includes the addition of certain assets and liabilities associated with the Contributed EFH Entities. Also includes EFH Corp.'s contribution of liabilities associated with certain employee benefit plans to Vistra Energy.

(3)Net adjustments to cash, which represent distributions made or funding provided to an escrow account, classified as restricted cash, under the Plan of Reorganization, as follows:
Sources (uses): 
Net proceeds from PrefCo preferred stock sale$69
Addition of cash balances from the Contributed EFH Debtors22
Payments to TCEH first lien creditors, including adequate protection(486)
Payment to TCEH unsecured creditors (including $73 million to escrow)(502)
Payment of administrative claims to TCEH creditors(53)
Payment of legal fees, professional fees and other costs (including $52 million to escrow)(78)
Net use of cash$(1,028)

(4)Increase in restricted cash primarily reflects amounts placed in escrow to satisfy certain secured claims, unsecured claims and professional fee obligations associated with the bankruptcy.

(5)Reflects the deferred income tax impact of the Plan of Reorganization implementation, including cancellation of debts and adjustment of tax-basis for certain assets of PrefCo that issued mandatorily redeemable preferred stock as part of the Spin-Off.

(6)Primarily reflects the reclassification of transmission and distribution service payables to Oncor from payables with affiliates to trade payables with third parties pursuant to the separation of Vistra Energy from EFH Corp. and payment of accrued professional fees and unsecured claimant obligations incurred in conjunction with Emergence.


(7)Primarily reflects the payment of accrued interest and adequate protection to the TCEH first lien creditors on the Effective Date.

(8)Primarily reflects the following:

Reclassification of $82 million from LSTC related to secured and unsecured claims and $16 million in accrued professional fees from accounts payable to other current liabilities.

Additional accruals for $23 million of change-in-control obligations and $26 million in success fees triggered by Emergence, $7 million in professional fees, and $28 million of accrued liabilities related to the Contributed EFH Entities.

Payment of $12 million in professional fees.

(9)Reflects the conversion of the TCEH DIP Roll Facilities of $3.387 billion to the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities at Emergence, the issuance and sale of mandatorily redeemable preferred stock of PrefCo for $70 million, and the obligation related to a corporate office space lease contributed to Vistra Energy pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization. See Note 14 for additional details.

(10)Reflects the elimination of TCEH's liabilities subject to compromise pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization (see Note 5). Liabilities subject to compromise were settled as follows in accordance with the Plan of Reorganization:
Notes, loans and other debt$31,668
Accrued interest on notes, loans and other debt646
Net liability under terminated TCEH interest rate swap and natural gas hedging agreements1,243
Trade accounts payable and other expected allowed claims192
Third-party liabilities subject to compromise33,749
LSTC from the Contributed EFH Entities8
Total liabilities subject to compromise33,757
Fair value of equity issued to TCEH first lien creditors(7,741)
TRA Rights issued to TCEH first lien creditors(574)
Cash distributed and accruals for TCEH first lien creditors(377)
Cash distributed for TCEH unsecured claims(502)
Cash distributed and accruals for TCEH administrative claims(60)
Settlement of affiliate balances(99)
Net liabilities of contributed entities and other items(60)
Gain on extinguishment of LSTC$24,344

(11)Reflects the deferred income tax impact of the Plan of Reorganization implementation, including cancellation of debts and adjustment of tax basis of certain assets of PrefCo.

(12)Reflects the estimated present value of the TRA obligation. See Note 10 for further discussion of the TRA obligation valuation assumptions.

(13)Primarily reflects the following:

Addition of $122 million in liabilities primarily related to benefit plan obligations associated with a pension plan and a health and welfare plan assumed by Vistra Energy pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization. See Note 19 for further discussion of the benefit plan obligations.

Payment of $7 million in settlements related to split life insurance costs with a prior affiliate entity.

(14)Reflects the issuance of approximately 427,500,000 shares of Vistra Energy common stock, par value of $0.01 per share, to the TCEH first lien creditors. See Note 16.


(15)
Reflects adjustments to present Vistra Energy equity value at approximately $7.741 billion based on a reconciliation from the $10.5 billion enterprise value described above under Reorganization Value as depicted below:
Enterprise value$10,500
Vistra Operations Credit Facility – Initial Term Loan B Facility(2,871)
Vistra Operations Credit Facility – Term Loan C Facility(655)
Accrual for post-Emergence claims satisfaction(181)
Tax Receivable Agreement obligation(574)
Preferred stock of PrefCo(70)
Other items(2)
Cash and cash equivalents801
Restricted cash793
Equity value at Emergence$7,741
Common stock at par value$4
Additional paid-in capital7,737
Equity value$7,741
Shares outstanding at October 3, 2016 (in millions)427.5
Per share value$18.11

(16)Membership Interest impact of Plan of Reorganization are shown below:
Gain on extinguishment of LSTC$24,344
Elimination of accumulated other comprehensive income(22)
Change in control payments(23)
Professional fees(33)
Other items(14)
Pretax gain on reorganization adjustments (Note 5)24,252
Deferred tax impact of the Plan of Reorganization and Spin-off576
Total impact to membership interests$24,828

Fresh start adjustments

(17)Reflects the reduction of inventory to fair value, including (1) adjustment of fuel inventory to current market prices, and (2) an adjustment to the fair value of materials and supplies inventory primarily used in our lignite/coal-fueled generation assets and related mining operations.

(18)Reflects the $12 million increase in the fair value of certain real property assets and $3 million reduction of the fair value for other investments.

(19)Reflects the change in fair value of property, plant and equipment related primarily to generation and mining assets as detailed below:
Property, Plant and EquipmentAdjustmentFair Value
Generation plants and mining assets$(6,057)$3,698
Land140
490
Nuclear Fuel(23)157
Other equipment(30)97
Total$(5,970)$4,442


We engaged a third-party valuation specialist to assist in preparing the values for our property, plant and equipment. For our generation plants and related mining assets, an income approach was utilized in valuing those assets based on discounted cash flow models that forecast the cash flows of the related assets over their respective useful lives. Significant estimates and assumptions utilized in those models include (1) long-term wholesale power price forecasts, (2) fuel cost forecasts, (3) expected generation volumes based on prevailing forecasts and expected maintenance outages, (4) operations and maintenance costs, (5) capital expenditure forecasts and (6) risk adjusted discount rates based on the cash flows produced by the specific generation asset. The fair value of the generation plants and mining assets is based upon Level 3 inputs utilized in the income approach.

The fair value estimates for land and nuclear fuel utilized the market approach, which included utilizing recent comparable sales information and current market conditions for similarly situated land. Nuclear fuel values were determined by utilizing market pricing information for uranium. The fair value of land and nuclear fuel are based upon Level 3 inputs.

(20)Reflects the adjustment in fair value of $2.256 billion to identifiable intangible assets, including $1.636 billion increase related to retail customer relationships, $270 million increase related to the retail trade name, $190 million increase related to an electricity supply contract, $164 million increase related to retail and wholesale contracts and $4 million decrease related to other intangible assets (see Note 8).

Also reflects the reduction of fair value of $476 million to identifiable intangible liabilities, including a reduction of $525 million related to an electricity supply contract and an increase of $49 million to wholesale contracts.

(21)Reflects the deferred income tax impact of fresh-start adjustments to property, plant, and equipment, inventory, intangibles and debt issuance costs.

(22)Primarily reflects the following:

Addition of $197 million regulatory asset related to the deficiency of the nuclear decommissioning trust investment as compared to the nuclear generation plant retirement obligation. Pursuant to Texas regulatory provisions, the trust fund for decommissioning our nuclear generation facility is funded by a fee surcharge billed to REPs by Oncor, as a collection agent, and remitted monthly to Vistra Energy.

Adjustment to remove $26 million of unamortized debt issuance costs to reflect the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities at fair market value.

(23)Reflects the increase in fair value of the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities in the amount of $151 million based on the quoted market prices of the facilities.

(24)Increase in fair value of asset retirement obligation related to the plant retirement, mining and reclamation retirement, and coal combustion residuals. See Note 23 for further discussion of our asset retirement obligations.

(25)Reflects the following:

Reduction in fair value of unfavorable contracts related to wholesale contracts and a portion of an electricity supply contract in the amount of $476 million. See footnote (20) above for further detail.

Reduction of $465 million related to reduction in liability that represented excess amounts in the nuclear decommissioning trust above the carrying value of the asset retirement obligation related to our nuclear generation plant decommissioning.

Increase in fair value of obligations related to leased property in the amount of $29 million.

Increase in fair value of Pension and OPEB obligations in the amount of $12 million.

(26)Reflects the extinguishment of Predecessor membership interest and accumulated other comprehensive loss per the Plan of Reorganization.


(27)Reflects increase in goodwill balance to present final goodwill as the reorganization value in excess of the identifiable tangible assets, intangible assets, and liabilities at Emergence.
Business enterprise value$10,500
Add: Fair value of liabilities excluded from enterprise value3,030
Less: Fair value of tangible assets(8,215)
Less: Fair value of identified intangible assets(3,408)
Vistra Energy goodwill$1,907


7.REVENUE

The following tables disaggregate our revenue by major source:
 Year Ended December 31, 2018
 Retail ERCOT PJM NY/NE MISO 
Asset
Closure
 CAISO/Eliminations Consolidated
Revenue from contracts with customers:               
Retail energy charge in ERCOT$4,426
 $—
 $—
 $—
 $—
 $—
 $—
 $4,426
Retail energy charge in Northeast/Midwest1,123
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 1,123
Wholesale generation revenue from ISO/RTO—
 1,151
 792
 544
 420
 52
 167
 3,126
Capacity revenue—
 —
 369
 240
 53
 6
 30
 698
Revenue from other wholesale contracts—
 214
 29
 42
 133
 —
 6
 424
Total revenue from contracts with customers5,549
 1,365
 1,190
 826
 606
 58
 203
 9,797
Other revenues:               
Intangible amortization(26) (1) 2
 (9) (9) —
 —
 (43)
Hedging and other revenues (a)74
 (362) (62) (41) (195) (31) 7
 (610)
Affiliate sales—
 1,632
 595
 41
 318
 23
 (2,609) —
Total other revenues48
 1,269
 535
 (9) 114
 (8) (2,602) (653)
Total revenues$5,597
 $2,634
 $1,725
 $817
 $720
 $50
 $(2,399) $9,144
____________
(a)Includes $380 million of unrealized net losses from mark-to-market valuations of commodity positions. See Note 22 for unrealized net gains (losses) by segment.

Retail Energy Charges

counterparties. Revenue is recognized when electricitythe service is delivered to our customers in an amount that we expect to invoice for volumes delivered or services provided. Sales tax is excluded from revenue. Payment terms vary from 15 to 45 days from invoice date.performed. Revenue is recognized over-timeover time using the output method based on kilowatt hours delivered. Energy chargesdelivered or other applicable measurements, and cash settles shortly after invoicing. Vistra operates as a market participant within ERCOT, PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO, MISO and CAISO and expects to continue to remain under contract with each ISO/RTO indefinitely. Other wholesale contracts are delivered as a series of distinct services and are accounted for as a single performance obligation.


EnergyOther Revenues

Some of our contracts for the sale of electricity meet the definition of a derivative under the accounting standards related to derivative instruments. Revenue from derivative contracts is not considered revenue from contracts with customers under the accounting standards related to revenue. Our revenue from the sale of electricity under derivative contracts, including the impact of unrealized gains or losses on those contracts, is reported in the table above as hedging and other revenues. We have classified all sales to affiliates that are eliminated in consolidation as other revenues in the table above.

Contract and services that have been delivered but not billed by period end are estimated. Accrued unbilledOther Customer Acquisition Costs

We defer costs to acquire retail contracts and amortize these costs over the expected life of the contract. The expected life of a retail contract is calculated using historical attrition rates, which we believe to be an accurate indicator of future attrition rates. The deferred acquisition and contract cost balance as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 and January 1, 2018 was $80 million, $53 million, $38 million and $22 million, respectively. The amortization related to these costs during the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 totaled $46 million and $21 million, respectively, recorded as SG&A expenses, and $7 million and $9 million, respectively, recorded as a reduction to operating revenues in the consolidated statements of operations.

Practical Expedients

The vast majority of revenues are based on estimates of customer usage sincerecognized under the date ofright to invoice practical expedient, which allows us to recognize revenue in the last meter reading provided by the independent system operators or electric distribution companies. Estimated amountssame amount that we have a right to invoice our customers. Unbilled revenues are adjusted when actual usage is known and billed.

As contracts for retail electricity can be for multi-year periods, the Company has performance obligations under these contracts that have not yet been satisfied. These performance obligations have transaction prices that are both fixed and variable, and that varyrecorded based on the contract durationvolumes delivered and customer type. Forservices provided to the fixed price contracts,customers at the amountend of anythe period, using the right to invoice practical expedient. We have elected to not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations will vary based on customer usage,for contracts with variable consideration for which will depend on factors such as weather and customer activity and therefore it is not practicable to estimate such amounts.


Wholesale Generation Revenue from ISOs/RTOs

Revenue is recognized when volumes are delivered to the ISO or RTO. Revenue is recognized over timewe recognize revenue using the output method based on kilowatt hours delivered and cash is settled within 10 daysright to invoice practical expedient. We use the portfolio approach in evaluating similar customer contracts with similar performance obligations. Sales taxes are not included in revenue.

Performance Obligations

As of invoicing. Vistra Energy operates as a market participant within ERCOT, PJM, NYISO, ISO-NE, MISO and CAISO and expectsDecember 31, 2020, we have future performance obligations that are unsatisfied, or partially unsatisfied, relating to continue to remain under contract with each ISO or RTO indefinitely. Wholesale generation revenues are delivered as a series of distinct services and are accounted for as a single performance obligation.

Capacity Revenue

We provide capacity to customersauction volumes awarded through participation in capacity auctions held by the ISO or ISO/RTO or through bilateral sales. Generation facilities are awarded auction volumes through the ISO or RTO auction and bilateral sales are based on executed contracts with customers. Capacity revenues consistTherefore, an obligation exists as of revenues billed to a third party at either the marketdate of the results of the respective ISO/RTO capacity auction or a negotiatedthe contract price for making installed generationexecution date. These obligations total $834 million, $496 million, $121 million, $38 million and demand response capacity available$12 million that will be recognized in order to satisfy system integritythe years ending December 31, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and reliability requirements.2025, respectively, and $7 million thereafter. Capacity revenues are recognized whenas capacity is made available to the related ISOs/RTOs or counterparties.

116
Table of Contents
Accounts Receivable

The following table presents trade accounts receivable (net of allowance for uncollectible accounts) relating to both contracts with customers and other activities:
December 31,
20202019
Trade accounts receivable from contracts with customers — net$1,169 $1,246 
Other trade accounts receivable — net110 119 
Total trade accounts receivable — net$1,279 $1,365 



6.GOODWILL AND IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Goodwill

The following table provides information regarding our goodwill balance. There have been no impairments of goodwill since Emergence.

Balance at December 31, 2018$2,068 
Measurement period adjustments recorded in connection with the Merger14 
Goodwill recorded in connection with the Crius Transaction257 
Goodwill recorded in connection with the Ambit Transaction214 
Balance at December 31, 20192,553 
Measurement period adjustments recorded in connection with the Crius Transaction(14)
Measurement period adjustments recorded in connection with the Ambit Transaction44 
Balance at December 31, 2020$2,583 

At December 31, 2020, the goodwill balance of $2.583 billion consisted of the following:

•$1.907 billion arose in connection with our application of fresh start reporting at Emergence and was allocated entirely to our Retail reporting unit. Of the goodwill recorded at Emergence, $1.686 billion is deductible for tax purposes over 15 years on a straight-line basis.
•$175 million arose in connection with the Merger, of which $122 million was allocated to our Texas Generation reporting unit and $53 million was allocated to our Retail reporting unit. NaN of the goodwill related to the Merger is deductible for tax purposes.
•$243 million of goodwill arose in connection with the Crius Transaction and was allocated entirely to our Retail reporting unit. NaN of the goodwill related to the Crius Transaction is deductible for tax purposes.
•$258 million of goodwill arose in connection with the Ambit Transaction and was allocated entirely to our Retail reporting unit. The goodwill related to the Ambit Transaction is deductible for tax purposes over 15 years on a straight-line basis.

Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are required to be evaluated for impairment at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an impairment may exist. We have selected October 1 as our annual goodwill test date. On the most recent goodwill testing date, we applied qualitative factors and determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our Retail and Texas Generation reporting units exceeded their carrying value at October 1, 2020. Significant qualitative factors evaluated included reporting unit financial performance obligationand market multiples, cost factors, customer attrition and changes in reporting unit book value.

117
Table of Contents
Identifiable Intangible Assets and Liabilities

Identifiable intangible assets are comprised of the following:
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Identifiable Intangible AssetGross
Carrying
Amount		Accumulated
Amortization		NetGross
Carrying
Amount		Accumulated
Amortization		Net
Retail customer relationship$2,082 $1,434 $648 $2,078 $1,151 $927 
Software and other technology-related assets414 186 228 341 125 216 
Retail and wholesale contracts272 204 68 315 182 133 
Contractual service agreements (a)51 1 50 59 5 54 
Other identifiable intangible assets (b)96 19 77 40 15 25 
Total identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization$2,915 $1,844 1,071 $2,833 $1,478 1,355 
Retail trade names (not subject to amortization)1,374 1,391 
Mineral interests (not currently subject to amortization)1 2 
Total identifiable intangible assets$2,446 $2,748 
____________
(a)At December 31, 2020, amounts related to contractual service agreements that have become liabilities due to amortization of the economic impacts of the intangibles have been removed from both the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization.
(b)Includes mining development costs and environmental allowances (emissions allowances and renewable energy certificates).

Identifiable intangible liabilities are comprised of the following:
Year Ended December 31,
Identifiable Intangible Liability20202019
Contractual service agreements$129 $110 
Purchase and sale of power and capacity87 100 
Fuel and transportation purchase contracts73 76 
Total identifiable intangible liabilities$289 $286 

118
Table of Contents
Expense related to finite-lived identifiable intangible assets and liabilities (including the classification in the consolidated statements of operations) consisted of:
Identifiable Intangible Assets and LiabilitiesConsolidated Statements of OperationsRemaining useful lives of identifiable intangible assets at December 31,
2020 (weighted average in years)		Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Retail customer relationshipDepreciation and amortization3$283 $275 $304 
Software and other technology-related assetsDepreciation and amortization473 61 62 
Retail and wholesale contracts/purchase and sale/fuel and transportation contractsOperating revenues/fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees317 23 43 
Other identifiable intangible assetsOperating revenues/fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees/depreciation and amortization5223 148 58 
Total intangible asset expense (a)$596 $507 $467 
____________
(a)Amounts recorded in depreciation and amortization totaled $360 million, $340 million and $370 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 respectively. Amounts exclude contractual services agreements. Amounts include all expenses associated with environmental allowances including expenses accrued to comply with emissions allowance programs and renewable portfolio standards which are presented in fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees on our consolidated statements of operations. Emissions allowance obligations are accrued as associated electricity is satisfied ratablygenerated and renewable energy certificate obligations are accrued as retail electricity delivery occurs.

The following is a description of the separately identifiable intangible assets. In connection with fresh start reporting, the Merger, the Crius Transaction and the Ambit Transaction, the intangible assets were adjusted based on their estimated fair value as of the Effective Date, the Merger Date, the Crius Acquisition Date and the Ambit Acquisition Date, respectively, based on observable prices or estimates of fair value using valuation models.

•Retail customer relationship — Retail customer relationship intangible asset represents the fair value of our non-contracted retail customer base, including residential and business customers, and is being amortized using an accelerated method based on historical customer attrition rates and reflecting the expected pattern in which economic benefits are realized over timetheir estimated useful life.

•Retail trade names — Our retail trade name intangible asset represents the fair value of our retail brands, including the trade names of TXU EnergyTM, Ambit Energy, 4Change EnergyTM, Homefield Energy, Dynegy Energy Services, TriEagle Energy, Public Power and U.S. Gas & Electric, and was determined to be an indefinite-lived asset not subject to amortization. This intangible asset is evaluated for impairment at least annually in accordance with accounting guidance related to goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets. Significant assumptions included within the development of the fair value estimate include estimated gross margins for future periods and implied royalty rates. On the most recent testing date, we determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our retail trade name intangible asset exceeded its carrying value at October 1, 2020.

•Retail and wholesale contracts/purchase and sale contracts — These intangible assets represent the value of various retail and wholesale contracts and purchase and sale contracts. The contracts were identified as our power generation facilities stand ready to deliver powereither assets or liabilities based on the respective fair values as of the Effective Date, the Merger Date, the Crius Acquisition Date or the Ambit Acquisition Date utilizing prevailing market prices for commodities or services compared to the customer. Penaltiesfixed prices contained in these agreements. The intangible assets or liabilities are assessedbeing amortized in relation to the economic terms of the related contracts.

119
Table of Contents
•Contractual service agreements — Our acquired contractual service agreements represent the estimated fair value of favorable or unfavorable contract obligations with respect to long-term plant maintenance agreements, rail transportation agreements and rail car leases, and are being amortized based on the expected usage of the service agreements over the contract terms. The majority of the plant maintenance services relate to capital improvements and the related amortization of the plant maintenance agreements is recorded to property, plant and equipment. Amortization of rail transportation and rail car lease agreements is recorded to fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees.

Estimated Amortization of Identifiable Intangible Assets and Liabilities

As of December 31, 2020, the estimated aggregate amortization expense of identifiable intangible assets and liabilities for each of the next five fiscal years is as shown below.
YearEstimated Amortization Expense
2021$276 
2022$183 
2023$128 
2024$78 
2025$54 

7.INCOME TAXES

Vistra files a U.S. federal income tax return that includes the results of its consolidated subsidiaries. Vistra is the corporate parent of the Vistra consolidated group. Pursuant to applicable U.S. Department of the Treasury regulations and published guidance of the IRS, corporations that are members of a consolidated group have joint and several liability for the taxes of such group.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

The components of our income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Current:
U.S. Federal$(5)$(1)$(13)
State41 10 30 
Total current36 9 17 
Deferred:
U.S. Federal171 260 (8)
State59 21 (54)
Total deferred230 281 (62)
Total$266 $290 $(45)

120
Table of Contents
Reconciliation of income taxes computed at the U.S. federal statutory rate to income tax expense (benefit) recorded:
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Income (loss) before income taxes$890 $1,216 $(101)
U.S. federal statutory rate21 %21 %21 %
Income taxes at the U.S. federal statutory rate187 255 (20)
Nondeductible TRA accretion(7)5 8 
State tax, net of federal benefit32 48 22 
Federal and State return to provision adjustment13 (17)(12)
Remeasurement of historical Vistra deferred taxes for expanded state footprint0 0 (54)
Effect of refundable minimum tax credits no longer subject to sequestration0 0 (15)
Nondeductible compensation0 3 8 
Nondeductible transaction costs0 2 3 
Equity awards0 (4)(3)
Valuation allowance on state NOLs41 13 20 
Lignite depletion(3)(6)0 
Texas gross margin amended return0 (3)0 
Other3 (6)(2)
Income tax expense (benefit)$266 $290 $(45)
Effective tax rate29.9 %23.8 %44.6 %

Deferred Income Tax Balances

Deferred income taxes provided for temporary differences based on tax laws in effect at December 31, 2020 and 2019 are as follows:
December 31,
20202019
Noncurrent Deferred Income Tax Assets
Tax credit carryforwards$75 $73 
Loss carryforwards953 921 
Identifiable intangible assets293 214 
Long-term debt19 257 
Employee benefit obligations129 112 
Commodity contracts and interest rate swaps96 108 
Other47 43 
Total deferred tax assets$1,612 $1,728 
Noncurrent Deferred Income Tax Liabilities
Property, plant and equipment632 554 
Total deferred tax liabilities632 554 
Valuation allowance143 110 
Net Deferred Income Tax Asset$837 $1,064 

121
Table of Contents
At December 31, 2020, we had total deferred tax assets of approximately $837 million that were substantially comprised of book and tax basis differences related to our generation and mining property, plant and equipment, as well as federal and state net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards. Our deferred tax assets were significantly impacted by the ISOMerger. For the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized a partial valuation allowance of $32 million on the net operating loss carryforwards related largely to Illinois and New York due to forecasted expiration. As of December 31, 2019, we assessed the need for a valuation allowance related to our deferred tax asset and considered both positive and negative evidence related to the likelihood of realization of the deferred tax assets. In connection with our analysis, we concluded that it is more likely than not that the federal deferred tax assets will be fully utilized by future taxable income, and thus no valuation allowance was required.

At December 31, 2020, we had $3.4 billion pre-tax net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards for federal income tax purposes that will begin to expire in 2032. At December 31, 2020, we had 0 remaining AMT credits refundable through the TCJA available.

The income tax effects of the components included in accumulated other comprehensive income totaled a net deferred tax asset of $5 million and $3 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) and Final Section 163(j) Regulations

In response to the global pandemic related to COVID-19, the CARES Act was signed into law in March 2020. The CARES Act provides numerous relief provisions for corporate taxpayers, including modification of the utilization limitations on net operating losses, favorable expansion of the deduction for business interest expense under IRC Section 163(j) (Section 163(j)), the ability to accelerate timing of refundable AMT credits and the temporary suspension of certain payment requirements for the employer portion of social security taxes. Additionally, the final Section 163(j) regulations were issued in July 2020 and provided a critical correction to the proposed regulations with respect to the computation of adjusted taxable income. Vistra received $64 million in 2020 relating to the acceleration of AMT refunds and an approximate $350 million increase in interest expense deduction over the 2019 and 2020 tax years under the cumulative impact of these final laws and regulation pertaining to Section 163(j). Additionally, Vistra expects to receive an approximate $305 million increase in interest expense deduction in the 2021 tax year under the final Section 163(j) regulations. We do not anticipate a material impact to the effective tax rate from these impacts. Vistra is also utilizing the CARES Act payroll deferral mechanism to defer the payment of approximately $22 million from 2020 to 2021 and 2022.

Liability for Uncertain Tax Positions

Accounting guidance related to uncertain tax positions requires that all tax positions subject to uncertainty be reviewed and assessed with recognition and measurement of the tax benefit based on a "more-likely-than-not" standard with respect to the ultimate outcome, regardless of whether this assessment is favorable or RTO against generation facilities ifunfavorable.

We classify interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as current income tax expense. The amounts were immaterial for the facilityyears ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018. The following table summarizes the changes to the uncertain tax positions, reported in accumulated deferred income taxes and other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Balance at beginning of period, excluding interest and penalties$126 $39 $0 
Additions allocated in the Merger0 0 39 
Additions based on tax positions related to prior years3 3 0 
Reductions based on tax positions related to prior years(90)0 0 
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year0 87 0 
Settlements with taxing authorities0 (3)0 
Balance at end of period, excluding interest and penalties$39 $126 $39 

122
Table of Contents
Vistra and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in U.S. federal and state jurisdictions and are expected to be subject to examinations by the IRS and other taxing authorities. The IRS has notified us of its intention to open an audit regarding the 2018 tax year. Crius is not available duringcurrently under audit by the capacity period. The penalties are recordedIRS for the tax years 2015 and 2016. Uncertain tax positions totaling $39 million at December 31, 2020 reflect the final regulations under Section 163(j) that were released in July 2020, and we have adjusted deferred tax assets and liabilities by $87 million in the year ended December 31, 2020. Uncertain tax positions totaling $39 million at December 31, 2018 arose in connection with the Merger as a reduction to revenue.discussed in Note 2.


Revenue from Other Wholesale Contracts


Other wholesale contracts include other revenue activity with the ISOs or RTOs,ISO/RTO, such as ancillary services, auction revenue, neutrality revenue and revenue from nonaffiliated retail electric providers, municipalities or other wholesale counterparties. Revenue is recognized when the service is performed. Revenue is recognized over time using the output method based on kilowatt hours delivered or other applicable measurements, and cash settles shortly after invoicing. Vistra Energy operates as a market participant within ERCOT, PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO, ISO-NE, MISO and CAISO and expects to continue to remain under contract with each ISO or ISO/RTO indefinitely. Other wholesale contracts are delivered as a series of distinct services and are accounted for as a single performance obligation.


Other Revenues


Some of our contracts for the sale of electricity meet the definition of a derivative under the accounting standards related to derivative instruments. Revenue from derivative contracts is not considered revenue from contracts with customers under the accounting standards related to revenue. Our revenue from the sale of electricity under derivative contracts, including the impact of unrealized gains or losses on those contracts, areis reported in the table above as hedging and other revenues. We have classified all sales to affiliates that are eliminated in consolidation as other revenues in the table above.


Contract and Other Customer Acquisition Costs


We defer costs to acquire retail contracts and amortize these costs over the expected life of the contract. The expected life of a retail contract is calculated using historical attrition rates, which we believe to be an accurate indicator of future attrition rates. The deferred acquisition and contract cost balance as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 and January 1, 2018 was $80 million, $53 million, $38 million and $22 million, respectively. The amortization related to these costs during the year ended December 31, 20182020 and 2019 totaled $10$46 million and $21 million, respectively, recorded as selling, general and administrativeSG&A expenses, and $7 million and $9 million, respectively, recorded as a reduction to operating revenues in the statementconsolidated statements of consolidated income (loss).operations.


Practical Expedients


The vast majority of revenues are recognized under the right to invoice practical expedient, which allows us to recognize revenue in the same amount that we have a right to invoice our customers. Unbilled revenues are recorded based on the volumes delivered and services provided to the customers at the end of the period, using the right to invoice practical expedient. We dohave elected to not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts with variable consideration for which we recognize revenue using the right to invoice practical expedient. We use the portfolio approach in evaluating similar customer contracts with similar performance obligations. Sales taxes are not included in revenue.



Performance Obligations


As of December 31, 2018,2020, we have future performance obligations that are unsatisfied, or partially unsatisfied, relating to capacity auction volumes awarded through capacity auctions held by the ISO or ISO/RTO or through bilateral sales.contracts with customers. Therefore, an obligation exists as of the date of the results of the respective ISO or ISO/RTO capacity auction or the contract execution date for bilateral customers. The transaction price is also set by the results of the capacity auction and/or executed contract.date. These obligations total $968$834 million, $718$496 million, $720$121 million, $342$38 million and $38$12 million that will be recognized in the years ending December 31, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2023,2025, respectively, and $65$7 million thereafter. Capacity revenues are recognized as capacity services are providedis made available to the related ISOs or ISOs/RTOs or bilateral counterparties.


116
Table of Contents
Accounts Receivable


The following table presents trade accounts receivable (net of allowance for uncollectible accounts) relating to both contracts with customers and other activities:
December 31,
20202019
Trade accounts receivable from contracts with customers — net$1,169 $1,246 
Other trade accounts receivable — net110 119 
Total trade accounts receivable — net$1,279 $1,365 



6.GOODWILL AND IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
 December 31, 2018
Trade accounts receivable from contracts with customers — net$951
Other trade accounts receivable — net136
Total trade accounts receivable — net$1,087


Goodwill


The following table provides information regarding our goodwill balance. There have been no impairments of goodwill since Emergence.

8.GOODWILL AND IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Balance at December 31, 2018$2,068 
Measurement period adjustments recorded in connection with the Merger14 
Goodwill recorded in connection with the Crius Transaction257 
Goodwill recorded in connection with the Ambit Transaction214 
Balance at December 31, 20192,553 
Measurement period adjustments recorded in connection with the Crius Transaction(14)
Measurement period adjustments recorded in connection with the Ambit Transaction44 
Balance at December 31, 2020$2,583 

Goodwill

The carrying value of goodwill totaled $2.068 billion and $1.907 billion atAt December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Of2020, the total goodwill $161 million arose in connection with the Merger and is recorded at the corporate and other level non-segment operations pending completionbalance of $2.583 billion consisted of the purchase price allocation in the first quarter of 2019, at which time goodwill will be allocated to reporting units. The remaining $1.907following:

•$1.907 billion arose in connection with our application of fresh start reporting at Emergence and was allocated entirely to our ERCOT Retail reporting unit. There have been no impairments of Goodwill since Emergence. Of the goodwill recorded at Emergence, $1.686 billion is deductible for tax purposes over 15 years on a straight-line basis.

•$175 million arose in connection with the Merger, of which $122 million was allocated to our Texas Generation reporting unit and $53 million was allocated to our Retail reporting unit. NaN of the goodwill related to the Merger is deductible for tax purposes.
•$243 million of goodwill arose in connection with the Crius Transaction and was allocated entirely to our Retail reporting unit. NaN of the goodwill related to the Crius Transaction is deductible for tax purposes.
•$258 million of goodwill arose in connection with the Ambit Transaction and was allocated entirely to our Retail reporting unit. The goodwill related to the Ambit Transaction is deductible for tax purposes over 15 years on a straight-line basis.

Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are required to be evaluated for impairment at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an impairment may exist. As of the Effective Date, weWe have selected October 1 as our annual goodwill test date. On the most recent goodwill testing date, we applied qualitative factors and determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our ERCOT Retail and Texas Generation reporting unitunits exceeded itstheir carrying value at October 1, 2018.2020. Significant qualitative factors evaluated included reporting unit financial performance and market multiples, cost factors, customer attrition interest rates and changes in reporting unit book value.


117
Table of Contents
Identifiable Intangible Assets and Liabilities


Identifiable intangible assets are comprised of the following:
 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Identifiable Intangible Asset 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Net 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 NetIdentifiable Intangible AssetGross
Carrying
Amount		Accumulated
Amortization		NetGross
Carrying
Amount		Accumulated
Amortization		Net
Retail customer relationship $1,680
 $876
 $804
 $1,648
 $572
 $1,076
Retail customer relationship$2,082 $1,434 $648 $2,078 $1,151 $927 
Software and other technology-related assets 270
 105
 165
 183
 47
 136
Software and other technology-related assets414 186 228 341 125 216 
Retail and wholesale contracts 316
 138
 178
 154
 87
 67
Retail and wholesale contracts272 204 68 315 182 133 
Contractual service agreements 70
 —
 70
 —
 —
 —
Other identifiable intangible assets (a) 42
 15
 27
 33
 11
 22
Contractual service agreements (a)Contractual service agreements (a)51 1 50 59 5 54 
Other identifiable intangible assets (b)Other identifiable intangible assets (b)96 19 77 40 15 25 
Total identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization $2,378
 $1,134
 1,244
 $2,018
 $717
 1,301
Total identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization$2,915 $1,844 1,071 $2,833 $1,478 1,355 
Retail trade names (not subject to amortization)     1,245
     1,225
Retail trade names (not subject to amortization)1,374 1,391 
Mineral interests (not currently subject to amortization)     4
     4
Mineral interests (not currently subject to amortization)1 2 
Total identifiable intangible assets     $2,493
     $2,530
Total identifiable intangible assets$2,446 $2,748 
____________
(a)Includes mining development costs and environmental allowances and credits.

(a)At December 31, 2020, amounts related to contractual service agreements that have become liabilities due to amortization of the economic impacts of the intangibles have been removed from both the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization.
(b)Includes mining development costs and environmental allowances (emissions allowances and renewable energy certificates).

Identifiable intangible liabilities are comprised of the following:
Year Ended December 31,
Identifiable Intangible Liability20202019
Contractual service agreements$129 $110 
Purchase and sale of power and capacity87 100 
Fuel and transportation purchase contracts73 76 
Total identifiable intangible liabilities$289 $286 

118
Table of Contents
  Year Ended December 31,
  2018 2017
Identifiable Intangible Liability    
Contractual service agreements $136
 $—
Purchase and sale contracts 195
 36
Environmental allowances $70
 $—
Total identifiable intangible liabilities $401
 $36


Amortization expenseExpense related to finite-lived identifiable intangible assets and liabilities (including the classification in the consolidated statements of consolidated income (loss))operations) consisted of:
 Successor  Predecessor
Identifiable Intangible Assets and Liabilities Statements of Consolidated Income (Loss) Line Remaining useful lives of identifiable intangible assets at December 31,
2018 (weighted average in years)		 Year Ended December 31, Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016		  Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016		Identifiable Intangible Assets and LiabilitiesConsolidated Statements of OperationsRemaining useful lives of identifiable intangible assets at December 31,
2020 (weighted average in years)		Year Ended December 31,
 2018 2017   202020192018
Retail customer relationship Depreciation and amortization 4 $304
 $420
 $152
  $9
Retail customer relationshipDepreciation and amortization3$283 $275 $304 
Software and other technology-related assets Depreciation and amortization 3 62
 38
 9
  44
Software and other technology-related assetsDepreciation and amortization473 61 62 
Retail and wholesale contracts/purchase and sale contracts Operating revenues/fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees 4 43
 59
 38
  —
Retail and wholesale contracts/purchase and sale/fuel and transportation contractsRetail and wholesale contracts/purchase and sale/fuel and transportation contractsOperating revenues/fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees317 23 43 
Other identifiable intangible assets Operating revenues/fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees/depreciation and amortization 4 58
 15
 4
  6
Other identifiable intangible assetsOperating revenues/fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees/depreciation and amortization5223 148 58 
Total amortization expense (a) $467
 $532
 $203
  $59
Total intangible asset expense (a)Total intangible asset expense (a)$596 $507 $467 
____________
(a)Amounts recorded in depreciation and amortization totaled $370 million, $463 million, $162 million and $58 million for the Successor period for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016, respectively. Excludes contractual services agreements.

(a)Amounts recorded in depreciation and amortization totaled $360 million, $340 million and $370 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 respectively. Amounts exclude contractual services agreements. Amounts include all expenses associated with environmental allowances including expenses accrued to comply with emissions allowance programs and renewable portfolio standards which are presented in fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees on our consolidated statements of operations. Emissions allowance obligations are accrued as associated electricity is generated and renewable energy certificate obligations are accrued as retail electricity delivery occurs.
Following
The following is a description of the separately identifiable intangible assets. In connection with fresh start reporting, or the Merger, (see Notes 2the Crius Transaction and 6),the Ambit Transaction, the intangible assets were adjusted based on their estimated fair value as of the Effective Date, or the Merger Date, the Crius Acquisition Date and the Ambit Acquisition Date, respectively, based on observable prices or estimates of fair value using valuation models. The purchase price allocation is substantially complete, but is dependent upon final valuation determinations, which may materially change from our current estimates. We currently expect the final purchase price allocation will be completed no later than the first quarter of 2019.


•Retail customer relationship – — Retail customer relationship intangible asset represents the fair value of our non-contracted retail customer base, including residential and business customers, and is being amortized using an accelerated method based on historical customer attrition rates and reflecting the expected pattern in which economic benefits are realized over their estimated useful life.

•
Retail trade names – Our retail trade name intangible asset represents the fair value of the TXU EnergyTM, 4Change EnergyTM, Homefield and Dynegy Energy Services trade names, and was determined to be an indefinite-lived asset not subject to amortization. This intangible asset is evaluated for impairment at least annually in accordance with accounting guidance related to goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets. Significant assumptions included within the development of the fair value estimate include estimated gross margins for future periods and implied royalty rates. On the most recent testing date, we determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our retail trade name intangible asset exceeded its carrying value at October 1, 2018.


•Retail trade names — Our retail trade name intangible asset represents the fair value of our retail brands, including the trade names of TXU EnergyTM, Ambit Energy, 4Change EnergyTM, Homefield Energy, Dynegy Energy Services, TriEagle Energy, Public Power and U.S. Gas & Electric, and was determined to be an indefinite-lived asset not subject to amortization. This intangible asset is evaluated for impairment at least annually in accordance with accounting guidance related to goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets. Significant assumptions included within the development of the fair value estimate include estimated gross margins for future periods and implied royalty rates. On the most recent testing date, we determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our retail trade name intangible asset exceeded its carrying value at October 1, 2020.

•Retail and wholesale contracts/purchase and sale contracts – — These intangible assets represent the value of various retail and wholesale contracts and purchase and sale contracts. The contracts were identified as either assets or liabilities based on the respective fair values as of the Effective Date, the Merger Date, the Crius Acquisition Date or the MergerAmbit Acquisition Date utilizing prevailing market prices for commodities or services compared to the fixed prices contained in these agreements. The intangible assets or liabilities are being amortized in relation to the economic terms of the related contracts.

119
Table of Contents

•Contractual service agreements – — Our acquired contractual service agreements represent the estimated fair value of favorable or unfavorable contract obligations with respect to long-term plant maintenance agreements, rail transportation agreements and rail car leases, and are being amortized based on the expected usage of the service agreements over the contract terms. The majority of the plant maintenance services relate to capital improvements and the related amortization of the plant maintenance agreements is recorded to property, plant and equipment. Amortization of rail transportation and rail car lease agreements is recorded to fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees.



Estimated Amortization of Identifiable Intangible Assets and Liabilities


As of December 31, 2018,2020, the estimated aggregate amortization expense of identifiable intangible assets and liabilities for each of the next five fiscal years is as shown below.
YearEstimated Amortization Expense
2021$276 
2022$183 
2023$128 
2024$78 
2025$54 

7.INCOME TAXES
Year Estimated Amortization Expense
2019 $299
2020 $201
2021 $154
2022 $91
2023 $67


9.INCOME TAXES

Successor


Vistra Energy files a United StatesU.S. federal income tax return that includes the results of its consolidated subsidiaries. Vistra Energy is the corporate parent of the Vistra Energy consolidated group. Pursuant to applicable United StatesU.S. Department of the Treasury regulations and published guidance of the IRS, corporations that are members of a consolidated group have joint and several liability for the taxes of such group.

Predecessor

Prior to the Effective Date, EFH Corp. was the corporate parent of the EFH Corp. consolidated group, while TCEH and the Contributed EFH Debtors were classified as disregarded entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For the 2016 tax year (through the period until the Effective Date) EFH Corp. filed a U.S. federal income tax return in October 2017 that included the results of TCEH and the EFH Contributed Debtors. Pursuant to applicable U.S. Treasury regulations and published guidance of the IRS, corporations that are members of a consolidated group have joint and several liability for the taxes of such group.

Prior to the Effective Date, EFH Corp. and certain of its subsidiaries (including TCEH and the Contributed EFH Debtors) were parties to a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, which provided, among other things, that any corporate member or disregarded entity in the EFH Corp. group was required to make payments to EFH Corp. in an amount calculated to approximate the amount of tax liability such entity would have owed if it filed a separate corporate tax return. Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, the TCEH Debtors and the Contributed EFH Debtors rejected this agreement on the Effective Date. See Note 5 for a discussion of the Tax Matters Agreement that was entered into on the Effective Date between EFH Corp. and Vistra Energy. Additionally, since the date of the Settlement Agreement, no further cash payments among the Debtors were made in respect of federal income taxes. The Settlement Agreement did not alter the allocation and payment for state income taxes, which continued to be settled prior to the Effective Date.



Income Tax Expense (Benefit)


The components of our income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Current:
U.S. Federal$(5)$(1)$(13)
State41 10 30 
Total current36 9 17 
Deferred:
U.S. Federal171 260 (8)
State59 21 (54)
Total deferred230 281 (62)
Total$266 $290 $(45)

120
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016		  Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016
 2018 2017   
Current:        
U.S. Federal$(13) $72
 $—
  $(6)
State30
 14
 6
  9
Total current17
 86
 6
  3
Deferred:        
U.S. Federal(8) 417
 (75)  (1,234)
State(54) 1
 (1)  (36)
Total deferred(62) 418
 (76)  (1,270)
Total$(45) $504
 $(70)  $(1,267)
Table of Contents

Reconciliation of income taxes computed at the U.S. federal statutory rate to income tax expense (benefit) recorded:
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Income (loss) before income taxes$890 $1,216 $(101)
U.S. federal statutory rate21 %21 %21 %
Income taxes at the U.S. federal statutory rate187 255 (20)
Nondeductible TRA accretion(7)5 8 
State tax, net of federal benefit32 48 22 
Federal and State return to provision adjustment13 (17)(12)
Remeasurement of historical Vistra deferred taxes for expanded state footprint0 0 (54)
Effect of refundable minimum tax credits no longer subject to sequestration0 0 (15)
Nondeductible compensation0 3 8 
Nondeductible transaction costs0 2 3 
Equity awards0 (4)(3)
Valuation allowance on state NOLs41 13 20 
Lignite depletion(3)(6)0 
Texas gross margin amended return0 (3)0 
Other3 (6)(2)
Income tax expense (benefit)$266 $290 $(45)
Effective tax rate29.9 %23.8 %44.6 %
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016		  Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016
 2018 2017   
Income (loss) before income taxes$(101) $250
 $(233)  $21,584
US federal statutory rate21% 35% 35%  35 %
Income taxes at the U.S. federal statutory rate(20) 88
 (82)  7,554
Nondeductible TRA accretion8
 (80) 5
  —
State tax, net of federal benefit22
 13
 3
  (21)
Impacts of tax reform legislation on deferred taxes—
 451
 —
  —
Return to provision adjustment(12) 19
 —
  —
Remeasurement of historical Vistra Energy deferred taxes for expanded state footprint(54) —
 —
  —
Effect of refundable minimum tax credits no longer subject to sequestration(15) —
 —
  —
Nondeductible compensation8
 —
 —
  —
Nondeductible transaction costs3
 —
 —
  —
Equity awards(3) —
 —
  —
Nondeductible debt restructuring costs—
 —
 2
  38
Nondeductible interest expense—
 —
 —
  12
Nontaxable gain on extinguishment of LSTC—
 —
 —
  (8,593)
Valuation allowance on state NOLs20
 —
 —
  (210)
Other(2) 13
 2
  (47)
Income tax expense (benefit)$(45) $504
 $(70)  $(1,267)
Effective tax rate44.6% 201.6% 30.0%  (5.9)%



Deferred Income Tax Balances


Deferred income taxes provided for temporary differences based on tax laws in effect at December 31, 20182020 and 20172019 are as follows:
December 31,
20202019
Noncurrent Deferred Income Tax Assets
Tax credit carryforwards$75 $73 
Loss carryforwards953 921 
Identifiable intangible assets293 214 
Long-term debt19 257 
Employee benefit obligations129 112 
Commodity contracts and interest rate swaps96 108 
Other47 43 
Total deferred tax assets$1,612 $1,728 
Noncurrent Deferred Income Tax Liabilities
Property, plant and equipment632 554 
Total deferred tax liabilities632 554 
Valuation allowance143 110 
Net Deferred Income Tax Asset$837 $1,064 

121
 December 31,
 2018 2017
Noncurrent Deferred Income Tax Assets   
Tax credit carryforwards$76
 $—
Loss carryforwards958
 —
Property, plant and equipment—
 520
Identifiable intangible assets184
 81
Long-term debt188
 20
Employee benefit obligations109
 56
Commodity contracts and interest rate swaps212
 25
Other40
 8
Total deferred tax assets$1,767
 $710
Noncurrent Deferred Income Tax Liabilities   
Property, plant and equipment406
 —
Total deferred tax liabilities406
 —
Valuation allowance35
 —
Net Deferred Income Tax Asset$1,326
 $710
Table of Contents

At December 31, 2018,2020, we had total deferred tax assets of approximately $1.326 billion$837 million that were substantially comprised of book and tax basis differences related to our generation and mining property, plant and equipment, as well as federal and state net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards. Our deferred tax assets were significantly impacted by the Merger. For the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized a partial valuation allowance of $32 million on the net operating loss carryforwards related largely to Illinois and New York due to forecasted expiration. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we assessed the need for a valuation allowance related to our deferred tax asset and considered both positive and negative evidence related to the likelihood of realization of the deferred tax assets. In connection with our analysis, we concluded that it is more likely than not that the federal deferred tax assets will be fully utilized by future taxable income, and thus no valuation allowance was required.  We recognized a partial valuation allowance of $20 million on the net operating loss carryforwards related to Illinois due to forecasted expiration.  In addition, in our purchase price allocation we recognized a valuation allowance of $15 million for separate state jurisdictions.


At December 31, 2018,2020, we had $3.560$3.4 billion pre-tax net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards for federal income tax purposes that will begin to expire in 2032. At December 31, 2018,2020, we had $255 million alternative minimum tax (AMT)0 remaining AMT credits refundable through the TCJA available.


The income tax effects of the components included in accumulated other comprehensive income totaled a net deferred tax asset of $2$5 million and $3 million at December 31, 20182020 and 2019, respectively.

Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) and Final Section 163(j) Regulations

In response to the global pandemic related to COVID-19, the CARES Act was signed into law in March 2020. The CARES Act provides numerous relief provisions for corporate taxpayers, including modification of the utilization limitations on net operating losses, favorable expansion of the deduction for business interest expense under IRC Section 163(j) (Section 163(j)), the ability to accelerate timing of refundable AMT credits and the temporary suspension of certain payment requirements for the employer portion of social security taxes. Additionally, the final Section 163(j) regulations were issued in July 2020 and provided a net deferredcritical correction to the proposed regulations with respect to the computation of adjusted taxable income. Vistra received $64 million in 2020 relating to the acceleration of AMT refunds and an approximate $350 million increase in interest expense deduction over the 2019 and 2020 tax liabilityyears under the cumulative impact of $6these final laws and regulation pertaining to Section 163(j). Additionally, Vistra expects to receive an approximate $305 million at December 31, 2017.increase in interest expense deduction in the 2021 tax year under the final Section 163(j) regulations. We do not anticipate a material impact to the effective tax rate from these impacts. Vistra is also utilizing the CARES Act payroll deferral mechanism to defer the payment of approximately $22 million from 2020 to 2021 and 2022.



Liability for Uncertain Tax Positions


Accounting guidance related to uncertain tax positions requires that all tax positions subject to uncertainty be reviewed and assessed with recognition and measurement of the tax benefit based on a "more-likely-than-not" standard with respect to the ultimate outcome, regardless of whether this assessment is favorable or unfavorable.


We classify interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as current income tax expense. The amounts were immaterial in the Successor period for the years ended December 31, 20182020, 2019 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016.2018. The following table summarizes the changes to the uncertain tax positions, reported in accumulated deferred income taxes and other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets during the Successor period for the years ended December 31, 20182020, 2019 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016:2018.
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Balance at beginning of period, excluding interest and penalties$126 $39 $0 
Additions allocated in the Merger0 0 39 
Additions based on tax positions related to prior years3 3 0 
Reductions based on tax positions related to prior years(90)0 0 
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year0 87 0 
Settlements with taxing authorities0 (3)0 
Balance at end of period, excluding interest and penalties$39 $126 $39 

122
Table of Contents
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016		  Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016
 2018 2017   
Balance at beginning of period, excluding interest and penalties$—
 $—
 $—
  $36
Additions allocated in the Merger39
 —
 —
  —
Reductions based on tax positions related to prior years—
 —
 —
  (1)
Settlements with taxing authorities—
 —
 —
  (35)
Balance at end of period, excluding interest and penalties$39
 $—
 $—
  $—

Successor—Vistra Energy and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in U.S. federal and state jurisdictions and are expected to be subject to examinations by the IRS and other taxing authorities. Vistra EnergyThe IRS has notified us of its intention to open an audit regarding the 2018 tax year. Crius is not currently under audit by the IRS for any period.the tax years 2015 and 2016. Uncertain tax positions totaling $39 million at December 31, 2020 reflect the final regulations under Section 163(j) that were released in July 2020, and we have adjusted deferred tax assets and liabilities by $87 million in the year ended December 31, 2020. Uncertain tax positions totaling $39 million at December 31, 2018 arose in connection with the Merger and our assessment of the assumed liabilities is not complete as discussed in Note 2. We had no uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2017.

Predecessor— EFH Corp. and its subsidiaries file or have filed income tax returns in U.S. Federal, state and foreign jurisdictions and are subject to examinations by the IRS and other taxing authorities. EFH Corp. filed a request for prompt determination of its 2016 tax return with the IRS in October 2017, and such return was accepted for expedited review in December 2017. As a result, the IRS audit of EFH Corp.'s 2016 tax return concluded in April 2018. Texas franchise and margin tax return examinations have been completed.

In September 2016, EFH Corp. entered into a settlement agreement with the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts (Comptroller) whereby the Comptroller agreed to release all claims and liabilities related to the EFH Corp. consolidated group's state taxes, including sales tax, gross receipts utility tax, franchise tax and direct pay tax, through the agreement date, in exchange for a release of all refund claims and a one-time payment of $12 million. This settlement was entered and approved by the Bankruptcy Court in September 2016. As a result of the settlement, our Predecessor reduced the liability for uncertain tax positions by $27 million.

In July 2016, EFH Corp. executed a Revenue Agent Report (RAR) with the IRS for the 2010 through 2013 tax years. As a result of the RAR, our Predecessor reduced the liability for uncertain tax positions by $1 million, resulting in a reclassification to the accumulated deferred income tax liability. Total cash payment to be assessed by the IRS for tax years 2010 through 2013, but not expected to be paid during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases of the EFH Debtors, is approximately $15 million, plus any interest that may be assessed.

In March 2016, EFH Corp. signed a RAR with the IRS for the 2014 tax year. No financial statement impacts resulted from the signing of the 2014 RAR.



Tax Matters Agreement


On the Effective Date, we entered into the Tax Matters Agreement with EFH Corp. whereby the parties have agreed to take certain actions and refrain from taking certain actions in order to preserve the intended tax treatment of the Spin-Off and to indemnify the other parties to the extent a breach of such agreement results in additional taxes to the other parties.


Among other things, the Tax Matters Agreement allocates the responsibility for taxes for periods prior to the Spin-Off between EFH Corp. and us. For periods prior to the Spin-Off: (a) Vistra Energy is generally required to reimburse EFH Corp. with respect to any taxes paid by EFH Corp. that are attributable to us and (b) EFH Corp. is generally required to reimburse us with respect to any taxes paid by us that are attributable to EFH Corp.


We are also required to indemnify EFH Corp. against taxes, under certain circumstance, if the IRS or another taxing authority successfully challenges the amount of gain relating to the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale or the amount or allowance of EFH Corp.'s net operating loss deductions.


Subject to certain exceptions, the Tax Matters Agreement prohibits us from taking certain actions that could reasonably be expected to undermine the intended tax treatment of the Spin-Off or to jeopardize the conclusions of the private letter ruling we obtained from the IRS or opinions of counsel received by us or EFH Corp., in each case, in connection with the Spin-Off. Certain of these restrictions apply for two years after the Spin-Off.


Under the Tax Matters Agreement, we may engage in an otherwise restricted action if (a) we obtain written consent from EFH Corp., (b) such action or transaction is described in or otherwise consistent with the facts in the private letter ruling we obtained from the IRS in connection with the Spin-Off, (c) we obtain a supplemental private letter ruling from the IRS, or (d) we obtain an unqualified opinion of a nationally recognized law or accounting firm that is reasonably acceptable to EFH Corp. that the action will not affect the intended tax treatment of the Spin-Off.



8.TAX RECEIVABLE AGREEMENT OBLIGATION
10.TAX RECEIVABLE AGREEMENT OBLIGATION


On the Effective Date, Vistra Energy entered into a tax receivable agreement (the TRA) with a transfer agent on behalf of certain former first lienfirst-lien creditors of our Predecessor.TCEH. The TRA generally provides for the payment by us to holders of TRA Rights of 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal and state income tax that we realize in periods after Emergence as a result of (a) certain transactions consummated pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization (including the step-up in tax basis in our assets resulting from the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale), (b) the tax basis of all assets acquired in connection with the acquisition of two CCGT natural gas-fueled generation facilities in April 2016 and (c) tax benefits related to imputed interest deemed to be paid by us as a result of payments under the TRA, plus interest accruing from the due date of the applicable tax return.


Pursuant to the TRA, we issued the TRA Rights for the benefit of the first lien secured creditors of our PredecessorTCEH entitled to receive such TRA Rights under the Plan of Reorganization. Such TRA Rights are entitled to certain registration rights more fully described in the Registration Rights Agreement (see Note 21)19).


During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded an increase to the carrying value
123
Table of the TRA obligation totaling approximately $14 million as a result of changes in the timing of estimated payments and new multistate tax impacts resulting from the Merger. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded a decrease to the carrying value of the TRA obligation totaling $295 million related to changes in the timing of estimated payments resulting from changes in certain tax assumptions including (a) the impacts of Luminant's plan to retire its Monticello, Sandow 4, Sandow 5 and Big Brown generation plants and the impacts of the Alcoa settlement (see Note 4), (b) investment tax credits we expect to receive related to the Upton 2 solar development project (see Note 3), (c) assets acquired in the Odessa Acquisition (see Note 3) and (d) the impacts of other forecasted tax amounts.Contents


The following table summarizes the changes to the TRA obligation, reported as other current liabilities and Tax Receivable Agreement obligation in our consolidated balance sheets, for the years ended December 31, 20182020, 2019 and 20172018.
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
TRA obligation at the beginning of the period$455 $420 $357 
Accretion expense64 59 65 
Changes in tax assumptions impacting timing of payments (a)(69)(22)14 
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement(5)37 79 
Payments0 (2)(16)
TRA obligation at the end of the period450 455 420 
Less amounts due currently(3)0 0 
Noncurrent TRA obligation at the end of the period$447 $455 $420 
____________
(a)During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded a decrease to the carrying value of the TRA obligation totaling $69 million as a result of adjustments to forecasted taxable income, including the impacts of the CARES Act, changes to Section 163(j) percentage limitation amount, the impacts from the issuance of the final Section 163(j) regulations and the periodanticipated tax benefits from October 3, 2016 throughrenewable development projects. During the year ended December 31, 2016:2019, we recorded a decrease to the carrying value of the TRA obligation totaling approximately $22 million as a result of adjustments to the timing of forecasted taxable income and state apportionment due to the expansion of Vistra's state income tax profile, including the Dynegy, Crius and Ambit acquisitions. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded an increase to the carrying value of the TRA obligation totaling $14 million related to changes in the timing of estimated payments resulting changes in the timing of estimated payments and new multistate tax impacts resulting from the Merger.
 Successor
 Year Ended December 31, Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
 2018 2017 
TRA obligation at the beginning of the period$357
 $596
 $574
Accretion expense65
 82
 22
Payments(16) (26) —
Changes in tax assumptions impacting timing of payments14
 (62) —
Revaluation due to tax reform legislation—
 (233) —
TRA obligation at the end of the period420
 357
 596
Less amounts due currently—
 (24) —
Noncurrent TRA obligation at the end of the period$420
 $333
 $596


As of December 31, 2018,2020, the estimated carrying value of the TRA obligation totaled $420$450 million, which represents the discounted amount of projected payments under the TRA. The projected payments are based on certain assumptions, including but not limited to (a) the federal corporate income tax rate of 21% for 2018 and 35% for 2017 and 2016,, (b) estimates of our taxable income in the current and future years and (c) additional states that Vistra Energy now operates in, including the relevant tax rate and apportionment factor for each state. Our taxable income takes into consideration the current federal tax code, various relevant state tax laws and reflects our current estimates of future results of the business. These assumptions are subject to change, and those changes could have a material impact on the carrying value of the TRA obligation. As of December 31, 2018,2020, the aggregate amount of undiscounted federal and state payments under the TRA is estimated to be approximately $1.4 billion, with more than half of such amount expected to be attributable topaid during the firstnext 15 tax years, following Emergence, and the final payment expected to be made approximately 40 years following Emergencearound the year 2056 (if the TRA is not terminated earlier pursuant to its terms).


The carrying value of the obligation is being accreted to the amount of the gross expected obligation using the effective interest method. Changes in the amount of this obligation resulting from changes to either the timing or amount of TRA payments are recognized in the period of change and measured using the discount rate inherent in the initial fair value of the obligation. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement on the consolidated income (loss) totaled $79 million, which represents the changes to the carrying value of the TRA obligation discussed above and accretion expense totaling $65 million. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement on the statement of consolidated income (loss) totaled $213 million, which represents the reduction to the carrying value of the TRA obligation discussed above partially offset by accretion expense totaling $82 million. During the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016, the Impacts of the Tax Receivable Agreement represents accretion expense totaling $22 million.




11.INTEREST EXPENSE AND RELATED CHARGES

9.EARNINGS PER SHARE

 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016		  Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016
 2018 2017   
Interest paid/accrued post-Emergence$537
 $213
 $51
  $—
Interest paid/accrued on debtor-in-possession financing—
 —
 —
  76
Adequate protection amounts paid/accrued—
 —
 —
  977
Unrealized mark-to-market net (gains) losses on interest rate swaps5
 (29) 11
  —
Amortization of debt issuance costs, discounts and premiums—
 4
 (1)  4
Debt extinguishment loss27
 —
 —
  —
Capitalized interest(12) (7) (3)  (9)
Other15
 12
 2
  1
Total interest expense and related charges$572
 $193
 $60
  $1,049

Successor

The weighted average interest rate applicable to the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, considering the interest rate swaps discussed in Note 14, was 4.24% and 4.38% at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Predecessor

Interest expense for the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016 reflects interest paid and accrued on debtor-in-possession financing (see Note 14) and adequate protection amounts paid and accrued, as approved by the Bankruptcy Court in June 2014 for the benefit of secured creditors in exchange for their consent to the senior secured, super-priority liens contained in the DIP Facility. The interest rate applicable to the adequate protection amounts paid/accrued for the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016 was 4.95%.

The Bankruptcy Code generally restricts payment of interest on pre-petition debt, subject to certain exceptions. Other than amounts ordered or approved by the Bankruptcy Court, effective on the Petition Date, our Predecessor discontinued recording interest expense on outstanding pre-petition debt classified as LSTC. The table below shows contractual interest amounts, which are amounts due under the contractual terms of the outstanding debt, including debt subject to compromise during the Chapter 11 Cases. Interest expense reported in our statements of consolidated income (loss) does not include contractual interest on pre-petition debt classified as LSTC totaling $640 million for the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016, which had been stayed by the Bankruptcy Court effective on the Petition Date. Adequate protection amounts paid/accrued presented below excludes interest paid/accrued on TCEH first-lien interest rate and commodity hedge claims totaling $47 million for the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016, as such amounts are not included in contractual interest amounts below.
 Predecessor
 Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016
Contractual interest on debt classified as LSTC$1,570
Adequate protection amounts paid/accrued930
Contractual interest on debt classified as LSTC not paid/accrued$640



12.EARNINGS PER SHARE


Basic earnings per share available to common shareholdersstockholders are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated using the treasury stock method and includes the effect of all potential issuances of common shares under stock-based incentive compensation arrangements.
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock — basic$636 $928 $(54)
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding — basic488,668,263 494,146,268 504,954,371 
Net income (loss) per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — basic$1.30 $1.88 $(0.11)
Dilutive securities: Stock-based incentive compensation plan2,422,205 5,789,223 0 
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding — diluted491,090,468 499,935,490 504,954,371 
Net income (loss) per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — diluted$1.30 $1.86 $(0.11)

124
 Successor
 Year Ended
December 31, 2018		 Year Ended
December 31, 2017		 Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
Net loss attributable to common stock — basic (a)$(54) $(254) $(163)
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding — basic504,954,371
 427,761,460
 427,560,620
Net loss per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — basic$(0.11) $(0.59) $(0.38)
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding — diluted504,954,371
 427,761,460
 427,560,620
Net loss per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — diluted$(0.11) $(0.59) $(0.38)

(a)The minimum settlement amount of tangible equity units, or 15,056,260 shares, are considered to be outstanding and are
included in the computationTable of basic net income per share (see Note 16).Contents

Stock-based incentive compensation plan awards excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been antidilutive totaled 12,553,414, 2,447,850 and 14,165,813 3,642,844 and 7,332,789 shares for the Successor period for the years ended December 31, 20182020, 2019 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016,2018, respectively.



10.ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FINANCING
13.ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE SECURITIZATION PROGRAM


Accounts Receivable Securitization Program

TXU Energy Receivables Company LLC (RecCo), an indirect subsidiary of Vistra, Energy, has an accounts receivable financing facility (Receivables Facility) provided by issuers of asset-backed commercial paper and commercial banks (Purchasers). The Receivables Facility is currently scheduledwas renewed in July 2020, extending the term of the Receivables Facility to terminateJuly 2021, with the ability to borrow $550 million beginning with the settlement date in July 2020 until the settlement date in August 2019, unless termination occurs earlier2020, $625 million from the settlement date in accordanceAugust 2020 until the settlement date in November 2020, $550 million from the settlement date in November 2020 until the settlement date in December 2020 and $450 million thereafter for the remaining term of the Receivables Facility. In December 2020, the Receivables Facility was amended to include Ambit Texas, LLC (Ambit Texas), Value Based Brands and TriEagle Energy, as originators, and increase the commitment of the Purchasers to $500 million for the remaining term of the Receivables Facility. In February 2021, the Receivables Facility was amended to allow for a one-time, $596 million borrowing to take advantage of a higher receivable balance at such time. The borrowing limit is expected to return to $500 million in March 2021.

In connection with the Receivables Facility, TXU Energy, Dynegy Energy Services, Ambit Texas, Value Based Brands and TriEagle Energy, each indirect subsidiaries of Vistra and originators under the Receivables Facility (Originators), each sell and/or contribute, subject to certain exclusions, all of its receivables (other than any receivables excluded pursuant to the terms of the Receivables Facility. The Receivables Facility provides RecCo withFacility), arising from the ability to borrow up to $350 million.

Under the Receivables Facility, TXU Energy may sell or contribute, on an ongoing basis and without recourse, its accounts receivablesale of electricity to its special purpose subsidiary,customers and related rights (Receivables), to RecCo, a consolidated, wholly owned, bankruptcy-remote, direct subsidiary of TXU Energy. RecCo, in turn, is subject to certain conditions, and may from time to time, sell an undivided interest in alldraw under the receivablesReceivables Facility up to the limits described above to fund its acquisition of the Receivables from the Originators. RecCo has granted a security interest on the Receivables and all related assets for the benefit of the Purchasers under the Receivables Facility and its assets and credit are not availableVistra Operations has agreed to satisfyguarantee the debts and obligations of any person, including affiliates of RecCo.under the agreements governing the Receivables Facility. Amounts funded by the Purchasers to RecCo are reflected as short-term borrowings on the consolidated balance sheets. Proceeds and repayments under the Receivables Facility are reflected as cash flows from financing activities in our consolidated statements of consolidated cash flows. Receivables transferred to the Purchasers remain on Vistra Energy'sVistra's balance sheet and Vistra Energy reflects a liability equal to the amount advanced by the Purchasers. The Company records interest expense on amounts advanced. TXU Energy continues to service, administer and collect the trade receivablesReceivables on behalf of RecCo and the Purchasers, as applicable.


As of December 31, 2018,2020, outstanding borrowings under the receivables facility totaled $339$300 million and iswere supported by $477$735 million of RecCo gross receivables. As of December 31, 2019, outstanding borrowings under the Receivables Facility totaled $450 million and were supported by $629 million of RecCo gross receivables. As of February 23, 2021, outstanding borrowings under the receivables facility totaled approximately $596 million and were supported by approximately $774 million of RecCo gross receivables..



Repurchase Facility

14.LONG-TERM DEBT


SuccessorIn October 2020, TXU Energy and the other originators under the Receivables Facility entered into a $125 million repurchase facility (Repurchase Facility) that is provided on an uncommitted basis by a commercial bank as buyer (Buyer). The Repurchase Facility is collateralized by a subordinated note (Subordinated Note) issued by RecCo in favor of TXU Energy for the benefit of Originators under the Receivables Facility and representing a portion of the outstanding balance of the purchase price paid for the Receivables sold by the Originators to RecCo under the Receivables Facility. Under the Repurchase Facility, TXU Energy may request that Buyer transfer funds to TXU Energy in exchange for a transfer of the Subordinated Note, with a simultaneous agreement by TXU Energy to transfer funds to Buyer at a date certain or on demand in exchange for the return of the Subordinated Note (collectively, the Transactions). Each Transaction is expected to have a term of one month, unless terminated earlier on demand by TXU Energy or terminated by Buyer after an event of default.


TXU Energy and the other Originators have each granted Buyer a first-priority security interest in the Subordinated Note to secure its obligations under the agreements governing the Repurchase Facility, and Vistra Operations has agreed to guarantee the obligations under the agreements governing the Repurchase Facility. Unless earlier terminated under the agreements governing the Repurchase Facility, the Repurchase Facility will terminate concurrently with the schedule termination of the Receivables Facility.

125
Table of Contents
As of December 31, 2020, there were 0 borrowings under the Repurchase Facility. In February 2021, the Company borrowed $125 million under the Repurchase Facility.

11.LONG-TERM DEBT

Amounts in the table below represent the categories of long-term debt obligations incurred by the Successor.Company.
 December 31,
 2018 2017
Vistra Operations Credit Facilities$5,813
 $4,311
Vistra Operations 5.500% Senior Notes, due September 1, 20261,000
 —
Vistra Energy Senior Notes:
 
7.375% Senior Notes, due November 1, 20221,707
 —
5.875% Senior Notes, due June 1, 2023500
 —
7.625% Senior Notes, due November 1, 20241,147
 —
8.034% Senior Notes, due February 2, 202425
 —
8.000% Senior Notes, due January 15, 202581
 —
8.125% Senior Notes, due January 30, 2026166
 —
Total Vistra Energy Senior Notes3,626
 —
Other:   
7.000% Amortizing Notes, due July 1, 201924
 —
Forward Capacity Agreements236
 —
Equipment Financing Agreements120
 —
Mandatorily redeemable subsidiary preferred stock (a)70
 70
8.82% Building Financing due semiannually through February 11, 2022 (b)21
 27
Total other long-term debt471
 97
Unamortized debt premiums, discounts and issuance costs (c)155
 15
Total long-term debt including amounts due currently11,065
 4,423
Less amounts due currently(191) (44)
Total long-term debt less amounts due currently$10,874
 $4,379
December 31,
20202019
Vistra Operations Credit Facilities$2,572 $2,700 
Vistra Operations Senior Secured Notes:
3.550% Senior Secured Notes, due July 15, 20241,500 1,500 
3.700% Senior Secured Notes, due January 30, 2027800 800 
4.300% Senior Secured Notes, due July 15, 2029800 800 
Total Vistra Operations Senior Secured Notes3,100 3,100 
Vistra Operations Senior Unsecured Notes:
5.500% Senior Unsecured Notes, due September 1, 20261,000 1,000 
5.625% Senior Unsecured Notes, due February 15, 20271,300 1,300 
5.000% Senior Unsecured Notes, due July 31, 20271,300 1,300 
Total Vistra Operations Senior Unsecured Notes3,600 3,600 
Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes:
5.875% Senior Unsecured Notes, due June 1, 20230 500 
8.000% Senior Unsecured Notes, due January 15, 20250 81 
8.125% Senior Unsecured Notes, due January 30, 20260 166 
Total Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes0 747 
Other:
Forward Capacity Agreements45 161 
Equipment Financing Agreements68 99 
8.82% Building Financing due semiannually through February 11, 2022 (a)10 15 
Other3 12 
Total other long-term debt126 287 
Unamortized debt premiums, discounts and issuance costs (b)(68)(55)
Total long-term debt including amounts due currently9,330 10,379 
Less amounts due currently(95)(277)
Total long-term debt less amounts due currently$9,235 $10,102 
____________
(a)Shares of mandatorily redeemable preferred stock in PrefCo issued as part of the spin-off of Vistra Energy from EFH Corp. (see Note 5). This subsidiary preferred stock is accounted for as a debt instrument under relevant accounting guidance.
(b)Obligation related to a corporate office space capital lease transferred to Vistra Energy pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization. This obligation will be funded by amounts held in an escrow account that is reflected in other noncurrent assets in our consolidated balance sheets.
(c)Includes impact of recording debt assumed in the Merger at fair value.

(a)Obligation related to a corporate office space finance lease. This obligation will be funded by amounts held in an escrow account that is reflected in other noncurrent assets in our consolidated balance sheets.
(b)Includes impact of recording debt assumed in the Merger at fair value.

Vistra Operations Credit Facilities


At December 31, 2018,2020, the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities consisted of up to $8.313$5.297 billion in senior secured, first lienfirst-lien revolving credit commitments and outstanding term loans, consistingwhich consisted of revolving credit commitments of up to $2.5$2.725 billion, including a $2.3$2.35 billion letter of credit sub-facility (Revolving Credit Facility) and term loans of $2.793$2.572 billion (Term Loan B-3 Facility). These amounts reflect the following transactions and amendments completed in 2020, 2019 and 2018:

•In March 2020, Vistra Operations repurchased $100 million principal amount of Term Loan B-3 Facility borrowings at a weighted average price of $93.875 and cancelled them. We recorded an extinguishment gain of $6 million on the transaction in the year ended December 31, 2020.

126
Table of Contents
•In November 2019, Vistra Operations used the net proceeds from the November 2019 Senior Secured Notes Offering described below and $799 million of incremental borrowings under the Term Loan B-3 Facility to repay the entire amount outstanding of $1.897 billion of term loans under the B-1 Facility), $980 millionFacility (Term Loan B-1 Facility). Fees and expenses related to the transactions totaled $2 million in the year ended December 31, 2019, which were recorded as interest expense and other charges on the consolidated statements of operations.

•In October 2019, Vistra Operations borrowed $550 million under the Revolving Credit Facility. The proceeds of the borrowings were used for general corporate purposes, including the funding of a $425 million dividend to Vistra to pay the principal, premium and interest due in connection with the redemption by Vistra of the entire $387 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of 7.625% senior notes described below. In November 2019, Vistra Operations repaid $200 million under the Revolving Credit Facility.

•In June 2019, Vistra Operations used the net proceeds from the June 2019 Senior Secured Notes Offerings (described below) to repay $889 million under the Term Loan B-1 Facility, the entire amount outstanding of $977 million of term loans under the B-2 Facility) and $2.040 billionFacility (Term Loan B-3B-2 Facility, and together with the Term Loan B-1 Facility and the Term Loan B-2B-3 Facility, the Term Loan B Facility). and $134 million under the Term Loan B-3 Facility. We recorded an extinguishment loss of $4 million on the transactions in the year ended December 31, 2019.



These amounts reflect an amendment•In March 2019 and May 2019, the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities were amended whereby we obtained $225 million of incremental Revolving Credit Facility commitments. The letter of credit sub-facility was also increased by $50 million. Fees and expenses related to the amendments to the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities intotaled $2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, which were capitalized as a noncurrent asset.

•In June 2018, the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities were amended whereby we incurred $2.050 billion of borrowings under the new Term Loan B-3 Facility and obtained $1.640 billion of incremental Revolving Credit Facility commitments. The letter of credit sub-facility was also increased by $1.585 billion. The maturity date of the Revolving Credit Facility was extended from August 4, 2021 to June 14, 2023. As discussed below, the proceeds from the Term Loan B-3 Facility were used to repay borrowings under the credit agreement that Vistra Energy assumed from Dynegy in connection with the Merger. Additionally, letter of credit term loans totaling $500 million (Term Loan C Facility) were repaid using $500 million of cash from collateral accounts used to backstop letters of credit. Fees and expenses related to the amendment to the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities totaled $42 million in the year ended December 31, 2018, of which $23 million was recorded as interest expense and other charges on the consolidated statements of consolidated income (loss),operations, $9 million was capitalized as a reduction in the carrying amount of the debt and $10 million was capitalized as a noncurrent asset.


During the year ended December 31, 2020, we borrowed $1.075 billion and repaid $1.425 billion under the Revolving Credit Facility, with proceeds from the borrowings used for general corporate purposes.

The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and related available capacity at December 31, 20182020 are presented below.
 December 31, 2018December 31, 2020
Vistra Operations Credit Facilities Maturity Date 
Facility
Limit
 
Cash
Borrowings
 
Available
Capacity
Vistra Operations Credit FacilitiesMaturity DateFacility
Limit		Cash
Borrowings		Letters of Credit OutstandingAvailable
Capacity
Revolving Credit Facility (a) June 14, 2023 $2,500
 $—
 $1,135
Revolving Credit Facility (a)June 14, 2023$2,725 $0 $737 $1,988 
Term Loan B-1 Facility August 4, 2023 2,793
 2,793
 —
Term Loan B-2 Facility December 14, 2023 980
 980
 —
Term Loan B-3 Facility December 31, 2025 2,040
 2,040
 —
Term Loan B-3 Facility (b)Term Loan B-3 Facility (b)December 31, 20252,572 2,572 0 
Total Vistra Operations Credit Facilities $8,313
 $5,813
 $1,135
Total Vistra Operations Credit Facilities$5,297 $2,572 $737 $1,988 
___________
(a)Facility to be used for general corporate purposes. Facility includes a $2.3 billion letter of credit sub-facility, of which $1.365 billion of letters of credit were outstanding at December 31, 2018 and which reduce our available capacity.

(a)Revolving Credit Facility to be used for general corporate purposes. The Facility includes a $2.35 billion letter of credit sub-facility. Letters of credit outstanding reduce our available capacity. Cash borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are reported in short-term borrowings in our consolidated balance sheets.
(b)Beginning in 2020, cash borrowings under the Term Loan B-3 Facility are subject to a required scheduled quarterly payment in annual amount equal to 1.00% of the original principal amount with the balance paid at maturity. Amounts paid cannot be reborrowed.

127
Table of Contents
In February and2018, June 2018 and November 2019, certain pricing terms for the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities were amended. We accounted for these transactions as modifications of debt. At December 31, 2018,2020, cash borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility would bear interest based on applicable LIBOR rates, plus a fixed spread of 1.75%, and there were no0 outstanding borrowings. Letters of credit issued under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest of 1.75%. Amounts borrowed under the Term Loan B-1, B-2 and B-3 Facilities bearFacility bears interest based on applicable LIBOR rates plus fixed spreads of 2.00%, 2.25% and 2.00%, respectively.1.75%. At December 31, 2018,2020, the weighted average interest rates before taking into consideration interest rate swaps on outstanding borrowings was 4.52%, 4.77% and 4.47%1.90% under the Term Loan B-1, B-2 and B-3 Facilities, respectively.Facility. The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities also provide for certain additional fees payable to the agents and lenders, including fronting fees with respect to outstanding letters of credit and availability fees payable with respect to any unused portion of the available Revolving Credit Facility.


Obligations under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities are secured by a lien covering substantially all of Vistra Operations' (and its subsidiaries') consolidated assets, rights and properties, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, provided that the amount of loans outstanding under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities that may be secured by a lien covering certain principal properties of the Company is expressly limited by the terms of the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities.


The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities also permit certain hedging agreements to be secured on a pari-passu basis with the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities in the event those hedging agreements met certain criteria set forth in the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities.


The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities provide for affirmative and negative covenants applicable to Vistra Operations (and its restricted subsidiaries), including affirmative covenants requiring it to provide financial and other information to the agents under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and to not change its lines of business, and negative covenants restricting Vistra Operations' (and its restricted subsidiaries') ability to incur additional indebtedness, make investments, dispose of assets, pay dividends, grant liens or take certain other actions, in each case, except as permitted in the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities. Vistra Operations' ability to borrow under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities is subject to the satisfaction of certain customary conditions precedent set forth therein.



The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities provide for certain customary events of default, including events of default resulting from non-payment of principal, interest or fees when due, material breaches of representations and warranties, material breaches of covenants in the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities or ancillary loan documents, cross-defaults under other agreements or instruments and the entry of material judgments against Vistra Operations. Solely with respect to the Revolving Credit Facility, and solely during a compliance period (which, in general, is applicable when the aggregate revolving borrowings and issued revolving letters of credit (in excess of $300 million) exceed 30% of the revolving commitments), the agreement includes a covenant that requires the consolidated first lien net leverage ratio, which is based on the ratio of net first lien debt compared to an EBITDA calculation defined under the terms of the facilities,Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, not to exceed 4.25 to 1.00. As ofAlthough the period ended December 31, 2018,2020 was not a compliance period, we werewould have been in compliance with this financial covenant.covenant if it was required to be tested at such time. Upon the existence of an event of default, the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities provide that all principal, interest and other amounts due thereunder will become immediately due and payable, either automatically or at the election of specified lenders.


128
Table of Contents
Interest Rate Swaps — Effective January 2017, we entered into $3.0 billion notional amount ofVistra employs interest rate swaps to hedge a portion of our exposure to our variable rate debt. The interest rate swaps expire in July 2023. In May and June 2018, weAs of December 31, 2020, Vistra has entered into $3.0 billion notional amountthe following series of interest rate swaps that become effective in July 2023 and expire in July 2026.swap transactions.

Notional AmountExpiration DateRate Range
Swapped to fixed$3,000July 20233.67 %-3.91%
Swapped to variable$700July 20233.20 %-3.23%
Swapped to fixed (a)$720February 20243.71 %-3.72%
Swapped to variable$720February 20243.20 %-3.20%
Swapped to fixed (b)$3,000July 20264.72 %-4.79%
Swapped to variable (b)$700July 20263.28 %-3.33%
____________
(a)In June 2018, we completed the novation of $1.959 billion of Vistra Energy (legacy Dynegy) interest rate swaps to Vistra Operations. InOperations, of which $398 million expired and $841 million were terminated in June 2018, $238 million2019.
(b)Effective from July 2023 through July 2026.

During 2019, Vistra entered into $2.12 billion of thesenew interest rate swaps, expired.pursuant to which Vistra will pay a variable rate and receive a fixed rate. The terms of these new swaps were matched against the terms of certain existing swaps, effectively offsetting the hedge of the existing swaps and fixing the out-of-the-money position of such swaps. These matched swaps will settle over time, in accordance with the original contractual terms. The remaining interest rateexisting swaps expire between March 2019 and February 2024.

The interest rate swaps effectively fix the interest rates between 4.13% and 4.38%continue to hedge our exposure on $4.717$2.30 billion of our variable rate debt. The interest rate swapsdebt through July 2026.

Secured Letter of Credit Facilities

In August and September 2020, Vistra entered into 4 uncommitted 364-day standby letter of credit facilities (Secured LOC Facilities) that become effective in July 2023 and expire in July 2026 effectively fix the interest rates between 4.97% and 5.04% on $3.0 billion of our variable rate debt during the period. The interest rate swaps are each secured by a first lien secured interest on aall of Vista Operations' assets (which ranks pari passu basis with the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities). At December 31, 2020, $303 million of letters of credit were outstanding under the Secured LOC Facilities.


AlternativeAlternate Letter of Credit FacilityFacilities


In December 2018, we entered into an alternativeNaN alternate letter of credit facilityfacilities (each, an Alternate LOC Facility) became effective in the year ended December 31, 2019. NaN Alternate LOC Facility with aan aggregate facility limit of approximately $193$250 million at February 25, 2019.matured in December 2020. The remaining Alternate LOC Facility with an aggregate facility became effectivelimit of $250 million matures in January 2019.December 2021. At December 31, 2020, $245 million of letters of credit were outstanding under this Alternate LOC Facility.


Vistra Energy (legacy Dynegy)Operations Senior Secured Notes

In 2019, Vistra Operations issued and sold $3.1 billion aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes (June 2019 Senior Secured Notes and the November 2019 Senior Secured Notes) in offerings (the June 2019 Senior Secured Notes Offering and the November 2019 Senior Secured Notes Offering) to eligible purchasers under Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act consisting of the following:
Senior Secured NotesMaturity YearInterest Terms
(Due Semiannually in Arrears)		June 2019
Senior Secured Notes Offering (a)		November 2019 Senior Secured Notes Offering (b)
3.550% Senior Secured Notes2024January 15 and July 15$1,200 $300 
3.700% Senior Secured Notes2027January 30 and July 300 800 
4.300% Senior Secured Notes2029January 15 and July 15800 0 
Total senior secured notes$2,000 $1,100 
Net proceeds$1,976 $1,099 
Debt issuance and other fees (c)$20 $10 
___________
(a)The June 2019 Senior Secured Notes were sold pursuant to a purchase agreement by and among Vistra Operations, certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of Vistra Operations and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as representative of the several initial purchasers. Net proceeds, together with cash on hand, were used to prepay certain amounts outstanding and accrued interest (together with fees and expenses) under the Term Loan B Facility.
129
Table of Contents
(b)The November 2019 Senior Secured Notes were sold pursuant to a purchase agreement by and among Vistra Operations, certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of Vistra Operations and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC., as representative of the several initial purchasers. Net proceeds, together with borrowings under the Term Loan B-3 Facility and cash on hand, were used to repay the entire amount outstanding and accrued interest (together with fees and expenses) under the Term Loan B-1 Facility.
(c)Capitalized as a reduction in the carrying amount of the debt.

The indenture (as may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the Vistra Operations Senior Secured Indenture) governing the June 2019 Senior Secured Notes and the November 2019 Senior Secured Notes (collectively, the Senior Secured Notes) provides for the full and unconditional guarantee by certain of Vistra Operations' current and future subsidiaries that also guarantee the Vistra Operations Credit AgreementFacilities. The Senior Secured Notes are secured by a first-priority security interest in the same collateral that is pledged for the benefit of the lenders under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, which consists of a substantial portion of the property, assets and rights owned by Vistra Operations and certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of Vistra Operations as subsidiary guarantors (collectively, the Guarantor Subsidiaries) as well as the stock of Vistra Operations held by Vistra Intermediate. The collateral securing the Senior Secured Notes will be released if Vistra Operations' senior, unsecured long-term debt securities obtain an investment grade rating from two out of the three rating agencies, subject to reversion if such rating agencies withdraw the investment grade rating of Vistra Operations' senior, unsecured long-term debt securities or downgrade such rating below investment grade. The Vistra Operations Senior Secured Indenture contains certain covenants and restrictions, including, among others, restrictions on the ability of Vistra Operations and its subsidiaries, as applicable, to create certain liens, merge or consolidate with another entity, and sell all or substantially all of their assets.


Vistra Operations Senior Unsecured Notes

In 2018 and 2019, Vistra Operations issued and sold $3.6 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes in offerings (the August 2018 Senior Unsecured Notes Offering, the February 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes Offering and the June 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes Offerings) to eligible purchasers under Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act consisting of the following:
Senior Unsecured NotesMaturity YearInterest Terms
(Due Semiannually in Arrears)		August 2018 Senior Unsecured Notes Offering (a)February 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes Offering (b)June 2019
Senior Unsecured Notes Offering (c)
5.500% Senior Unsecured Notes2026March 1 and September 1$1,000 $0 $0 
5.625% Senior Unsecured Notes2027February 15 and August 150 1,300 0 
5.000% Senior Unsecured Notes2027January 31 and July 310 0 1,300 
Total$1,000 $1,300 $1,300 
Net Proceeds$990 $1,287 $1,287 
Debt issuance and other fees (d)$12 $16 $13 
___________
(a)The 5.500% senior unsecured notes due 2026 (the August 2018 Senior Unsecured Notes) were sold pursuant to a purchase agreement by and among Vistra Operations, the Guarantor Subsidiaries and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as representative of the several initial purchasers. Net proceeds, together with cash on hand and cash received from the funding of the Receivables Facility (see Note 10), were used to pay the purchase price and accrued interest (together with fees and expenses) required in connection with the 2018 Tender Offers (defined below).
(b)The 5.625% senior unsecured notes due 2027 (the February 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes) were sold pursuant to a purchase agreement by and among Vistra Operations, the Guarantor Subsidiaries and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC., as representative of the several initial purchasers. Net proceeds, together with cash on hand, were used to pay the purchase price and accrued interest (together with fees and expenses) required in connection with (i) the February 2019 Tender Offer, (defined below) and (ii) the redemption of approximately $35 million aggregate principal amount of our 7.375% senior unsecured notes due 2022 (7.375% senior notes) and approximately $25 million aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 8.034% senior unsecured notes due 2024 (8.034% senior notes).
(c)The 5.000% senior unsecured notes due 2027 (the June 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes) were sold pursuant to a purchase agreement by and among Vistra Operations, the Guarantor Subsidiaries and Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, as representative of the several initial purchasers. Net proceeds, together with cash on hand, were used to pay the purchase price and accrued interest (together with fees and expenses) required in connection with (i) the June 2019 Tender Offer (defined below) and (ii) the redemption of approximately $306 million of our outstanding 7.375% senior notes and approximately $87 million of our 7.625% senior unsecured notes due 2024 (7.625% senior notes) in July 2019. We recorded an extinguishment gain of $2 million on the redemptions in the year ended December 31, 2019.
130
Table of Contents
(d)Capitalized as a reduction in the carrying amount of the debt.

The indentures governing the June 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes, the February 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes and the August 2018 Senior Unsecured Notes (collectively, as each may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the Vistra Operations Senior Unsecured Indentures) provide for the full and unconditional guarantee by the Guarantor Subsidiaries of the punctual payment of the principal and interest on such notes. The Vistra Operations Senior Unsecured Indentures contain certain covenants and restrictions, including, among others, restrictions on the ability of Vistra Operations and its subsidiaries, as applicable, to create certain liens, merge or consolidate with another entity, and sell all or substantially all of their assets.

Debt Repurchase Program

In November 2018, our board of directors (the Board) authorized a bond repurchase program under which up to $200 million principal amount of outstanding Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes could be repurchased. Through June 30, 2019, $119 million principal amount of Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes had been repurchased. In July 2019, the Board authorized up to $1.0 billion to repay or repurchase any outstanding debt of the Company (or its subsidiaries), with that authority superseding the remaining availability under the $200 million bond repurchase program. Through April 2020, $684 million amount of debt had been repurchased under the $1.0 billion July 2019 authorization, including the repurchase of $100 million principal amount of Term Loan B-3 Facility borrowings discussed above and the redemption of $81 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of 8.000% senior unsecured notes due 2025 (8.000% senior notes) discussed below. In April 2020, the Board authorized up to $1.0 billion to repay or repurchase additional outstanding debt, with this new authority superseding and replacing the $316 million of availability under the previously authorized $1.0 billion debt repurchase program. Through December 31, 2020, approximately $666 million had been repurchased under the $1.0 billion April 2020 authorization, consisting of the redemption of the Vistra 5.875% senior unsecured notes due 2023 (5.875% senior notes) and the redemption of the Vistra 8.125% senior unsecured notes due 2026 (8.125% senior notes), each as described below.

Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes

On the Merger Date, Vistra Energyassumed $6.138 billion principal amount of Dynegy's senior unsecured notes (Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes. In June 2018, each of the Company's subsidiaries that guaranteed the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities (and did not already guarantee the senior notes) provided a guarantee on the senior notes that remained outstanding.

Following the redemption, repurchase and tender offer transactions below, Vistra had no outstanding senior notes at the Parent level.
Vistra Senior Unsecured NotesMaturity Year2018 Redemptions/Repurchases (a)August
2018 Tender Offer (b)		February 2019 Tender Offer (c)June
2019 Tender Offer (d)		2019 Redemptions (e)2020 Redemptions (f)
6.750%Senior Unsecured Notes2019$850 $0 $0 $— $0 $0 
7.375% Senior Unsecured Notes202243 0 1,193 173 341 0 
5.875% Senior Unsecured Notes20230 0 0 0 0 500 
7.625% Senior Unsecured Notes202477 26 0 672 475 0 
8.034% Senior Unsecured Notes20240 163 0 0 25 0 
8.000% Senior Unsecured Notes20250 669 0 0 0 81 
8.125%Senior Unsecured Notes20260 684 0 0 0 166 
Total$970 $1,542 $1,193 $845 $841 $747 
Extinguishment gain/(loss)$0 $(27)$7 $7 $11 $11 
____________
(a)In May 2018, $850 million of outstanding 6.75% senior unsecured notes due 2019 were redeemed at a redemption price of 101.688% of the aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest up to but not including the date of redemption. Fees and expenses related to the redemption totaled $14 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 and were recorded as interest expense and other charges on the consolidated statements of operations. In addition, Vistra repurchased $119 million of Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes under the bond repurchase program described above.
(b)In August 2018, Vistra used the net proceeds from the August 2018 Senior Unsecured Notes Offering, proceeds from the Receivables Facility (see Note 10) and cash on hand to fund cash tender offers (the 2018 Tender Offers) to purchase for cash $1.542 billion aggregate principal amount of Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes.
(c)In February 2019, Vistra used the net proceeds from the February 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes Offering to fund a cash tender offer (the February 2019 Tender Offer) to purchase for cash $1.193 billion aggregate principal amount of 7.375% senior notes.
131
Table of Contents
(d)In June 2019, Vistra used the net proceeds from the June 2019 Notes Offering to fund a cash tender offer (the June 2019 Tender Offer) to purchase for cash $173 million of 7.375% senior notes and $672 million of 7.625% senior notes. In July 2019, Vistra accepted and settled an additional approximately $1 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding 7.625% senior notes that were tendered after the early tender date of the June 2019 Tender Offer.
(e)In November 2019, Vistra redeemed $387 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of 7.625% senior notes at a redemption price equal to 103.8% of the aggregate principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of redemption (the 2019 Redemption). Vistra redeemed $341 million, $87 million and $25 million aggregate principal amount of 7.375% senior notes, 7.625% senior notes and 8.034% senior notes, respectively, using proceeds from the February 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes Offering and the June 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes Offerings discussed above.
(f)In January 2020, June 2020 and July 2020, Vistra redeemed aggregate principal amounts of $81 million of 8.000% senior notes, $500 million of 5.875% senior notes and $166 million of 8.125% senior notes, respectively, at redemption prices of 104%, 100.979% and 104.063%, respectively, of the aggregate principal amounts thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the dates of redemption (the 2020 Redemptions, and together with the 2019 Redemption, the Redemptions).

February2019 Consent Solicitation — In connection with the February 2019 Tender Offer, Vistra also commenced solicitation of consents from holders of the 7.375% senior notes. Vistra received the requisite consents from the holders of the 7.375% senior notes and amended the indenture governing these senior notes to, among other things, eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain events of default.

August 2018 Consent Solicitations — In connection with the 2018 Tender Offers, Vistra also commenced solicitations of consents from holders of the 7.375% senior notes, the 7.625% senior notes, the 8.034% senior notes, the 8.000% senior notes and the 8.125% senior notes to amend certain provisions of the applicable indentures governing each series of senior notes and the registration rights agreement with respect to the 8.125% senior notes. Vistra received the requisite consents from the holders of the 8.034% senior notes, the 8.000% senior notes and the 8.125% senior notes (collectively, the Consent Senior Notes) and amended (a) the indentures governing each series of the applicable senior notes to, among other things, eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain events of default and (b) the registration rights agreement with respect to the 8.125% senior notes to remove, among other things, the requirement that Vistra commence an exchange offer to issue registered securities in exchange for the existing, nonregistered notes.

Other Long-Term Debt

Amortizing Notes — On the Merger Date, Vistra assumed the obligations of Dynegy's senior unsecured amortizing note (Amortizing Notes) that matured on July 1, 2019. The Amortizing Notes were issued in connection with the issuance of the tangible equity units (TEUs) by Dynegy (see Note 14). Each installment payment per Amortizing Note was paid in cash and constituted a partial repayment of principal and a payment of interest, computed at an annual rate of 7.00%. Interest was calculated on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. Payments were applied first to the interest due and payable and then to the reduction of the unpaid principal amount, allocated as set forth in the indenture (Amortizing Notes Indenture). On the maturity date, the Company paid all amounts due under the Amortizing Notes Indenture and the Amortizing Notes Indenture ceased to be of further force and effect.

Forward Capacity Agreements — On the Merger Date, the Company assumed the obligation of Dynegy's agreements under which a portion of the PJM capacity that cleared for Planning Years 2018-2019, 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 was sold to a financial institution (Forward Capacity Agreements). The buyer in this transaction will receive capacity payments from PJM during the Planning Years 2020-2021 in the amount of $45 million. We will continue to be subject to the performance obligations as well as any associated performance penalties and bonus payments for those planning years. As a result, this transaction is accounted for as long-term debt with an implied interest rate of 1.14%.

Equipment Financing Agreements — On the Merger Date, the Company assumed Dynegy's Equipment Financing Agreements. Under certain of our contractual service agreements in which we receive maintenance and capital improvements for our gas-fueled generation fleet, we have obtained parts and equipment intended to increase the output, efficiency and availability of our generation units. We financed these parts and equipment under agreements with maturities ranging from 2021 to 2026.

Mandatorily Redeemable Subsidiary Preferred Stock — In October 2019, PrefCo voluntarily redeemed the entire $70 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its authorized preferred stock at a price per share equal to the preferred liquidation amount, plus accrued and unpaid dividends to and including the date of redemption.

132
Table of Contents
Debt Assumed in Crius Transaction — On the Crius Acquisition Date, Vistra assumed $140 million in long-term debt obligations in connection with the Crius Transaction consisting of the following:

•$44 million of 9.5% promissory notes due July 2025 (2025 promissory notes);
•$8 million of 2% Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development (CT DECD) term loans due February 2027; and
•$88 million of borrowings and $9 million of issued letters of credit under the legacy Crius credit facility.

In July 2019, borrowings of $88 million under the legacy Crius credit facility were repaid using cash on hand. In November 2019, (i) borrowings of approximately $38 million under the 2025 promissory notes were repaid using cash on hand and (ii) borrowings of approximately $2 million were offset by legacy indemnification obligations of the holders of the 2025 promissory notes. In November 2019, borrowings of $8 million under the Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development term loans were repaid using cash on hand.

Vistra (legacy Dynegy) Credit Agreement — On the Merger Date, Vistra assumed the obligations under Dynegy's $3.563 billion credit agreement consisting of a $2.018 billion senior secured term loan facility due 2024 and a $1.545 billion senior secured revolving credit facility. As of the Merger Date, there were no0 cash borrowings and $656 million of letters of credit outstanding under the senior secured revolving credit facility. On April 23, 2018, $70 million of the senior secured revolving credit facility matured. In June 2018, the $2.018 billion senior secured term loan facility due 2024 was repaid using proceeds from the Term Loan B-3 Facility. In addition, all letters of credit outstanding under the senior secured revolving credit facility were replaced with letters of credit under the amended Vistra Operations Credit Facilities discussed above, and the revolving credit facility assumed from Dynegy in connection with the Merger was paid off in full and terminated.


Vistra Operations Senior NotesMaturities


In February 2019, Vistra Operations issued and sold $1.3 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.625% senior notes due 2027 in an offering to eligible purchasers under Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the 2019 Notes Offering). The senior notes were sold pursuant to a purchase agreement by and among Vistra Operations, certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of Vistra Operations and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as representative of the several initial purchasers. Net proceeds from the 2019 Notes Offering totaling approximately $1.287 billion, together with cash on hand, were used to pay the purchase price and accrued interest (together with fees and expenses) required in connection with (i) the 2019 Tender Offer described below, (ii) the redemption of approximately $35 million aggregate principal amount of our 7.375% senior notes due 2022 and (iii) the redemption of approximately $25 million aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 8.034% senior notes due 2024. The 5.625% senior notes mature in February 2027, with interest payable in cash semiannually in arrears on February 15 and August 15 beginning August 15, 2019.


In August 2018, Vistra Operations issued $1.0 billion principal amount of 5.50% senior notes due 2026 in an offering to eligible purchasers. The senior notes were sold pursuant to a purchase agreement by and among Vistra Operations, certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of Vistra Operations and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as representative of the several initial purchasers. Fees and expenses related to the offering totaled $12 million in the three months ended September 30, 2018, which was capitalized as a reduction in the carrying amount of the debt. Net proceeds from the sale of the senior notes totaling approximately $990 million, together with cash on hand and cash received from the funding of the Receivables Facility (see Note 13), were used to pay the purchase price and accrued interest (together with fees and expenses) required in connection with the August 2018 cash tender offers described below. The 5.500% senior notes mature in September 2026, with interest payable in cash semiannually in arrears on March 1 and September 1 beginning March 1, 2019.

The indenture governing the 5.500% senior notes provides for the full and unconditional guarantee by certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of Vistra Operations of the punctual payment of the principal and interest on the notes. The Indenture contains certain covenants and restrictions, including, among others, restrictions on the ability of the Issuer and its subsidiaries, as applicable, to create certain liens, merge or consolidate with another entity, and sell all or substantially all of their assets.

Vistra Energy Senior Notes

Bond Repurchase Program — In November 2018, our board of directors (the Board) authorized a bond repurchase program under which up to $200 million principal amount of outstanding Vistra Energy senior notes could be repurchased. Through December 31, 2018, $119 million principal amount of senior notes had been repurchased. Fees and expenses related to the repurchases totaled $7 million in the three months ended December 31, 2018 and were recorded as interest expense and other charges on the statements of consolidated income (loss).

2019 Tender Offer and Consent Solicitation — In February 2019, Vistra Energy used the net proceeds from the issuance of the Vistra Operations 5.625% senior notes due 2027 to fund a cash tender offer (the 2019 Tender Offer) to purchase for cash $1.193 billion aggregate principal amount of 7.375% senior notes due 2022 assumed in the Merger.

In connection with the 2019 Tender Offer, Vistra Energy also commenced solicitation of consents from holders of the 7.375% senior notes due 2022. Vistra Energy received the requisite consents from the holders of the 7.375% senior notes due 2022 and amended the indenture governing these senior notes to, among other things, eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain events of default.

August 2018 Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations — In August 2018, Vistra Energy used the net proceeds from the issuance of the Vistra Operations 5.500% senior notes due 2026, proceeds from the Receivables Facility (see Note 13) and cash on hand to fund cash tender offers (the 2018 Tender Offers) to purchase for cash $1.542 billion of senior notes assumed in the Merger. We recorded an extinguishment loss of $27 million on the transactions in the year ended December 31, 2018. Notes purchased consisted of the following:

$26 million of 7.625% senior notes due 2024;
$163 million of 8.034% senior notes due 2024;
$669 million of 8.000% senior notes due 2025, and
$684 million of 8.125% senior notes due 2026.

In connection with the 2018 Tender Offers, Vistra Energy also commenced solicitations of consents from holders of the 7.375% senior notes due 2022, the 7.625% senior notes due 2024, the 8.034% senior notes due 2024, the 8.000% senior notes due 2025 and the 8.125% senior notes due 2026 to amend certain provisions of the applicable indentures governing each series of senior notes and the registration rights agreement with respect to the 8.125% senior notes due 2026. Vistra Energy received the requisite consents from the holders of the 8.034% senior notes due 2024, the 8.000% senior notes due 2025 and the 8.125% senior notes due 2026 (collectively, the Consent Senior Notes) and amended (a) the indentures governing each series of the applicable senior notes to, among other things, eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain events of default and (b) the registration rights agreement with respect to the 8.125% senior notes due 2026 to remove, among other things, the requirement that Vistra Energy commence an exchange offer to issue registered securities in exchange for the existing, nonregistered notes.


Assumption of Senior Notes in Merger — On the Merger Date, Vistra Energy assumed $6.138 billion principal amount of Dynegy's senior notes. In May 2018, $850 million of outstanding 6.75% senior notes due 2019 were redeemed at a redemption price of 101.688% of the aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to but not including the date of redemption. Fees and expenses related to the redemption totaled $14 million in the three months ended June 30, 2018 and were recorded as interest expense and other charges on the statements of consolidated income (loss). In June 2018, each of the Company's subsidiaries that guaranteed the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities (and did not already guarantee the senior notes) provided a guarantee on the senior notes that remained outstanding.

The senior notes that remain outstanding after the closing of the Tender Offers are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of Vistra Energy and are guaranteed by substantially all of its current and future wholly owned domestic subsidiaries that from time to time are a borrower or guarantor under the agreement governing the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities (Credit Facilities Agreement) (see Note 24). The respective indentures of the senior notes (except with respect to the Consent Senior Notes) limit, among other things, the ability of the Company or any of the guarantors to create liens upon any principal property to secure debt for borrowed money in excess of, among other limitations, 30% of total assets. The respective indentures of the senior notes also contain customary events of default which would permit the holders of the applicable series of senior notes to declare such notes to be immediately due and payable if not cured within applicable grace periods, including the failure to make timely principal or interest payments on such notes or (except with respect to the Consent Senior Notes) other indebtedness aggregating $100 million or more, and, except with respect to the Consent Senior Notes, the failure to satisfy covenants, and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency.

Amortizing Notes

On the Merger Date, Vistra Energy assumed the obligations of Dynegy's senior amortizing note (Amortizing Notes) maturing on July 1, 2019. The Amortizing Notes were issued in connection with the issuance of the tangible equity units (TEUs) by Dynegy (see Note 16). Each installment payment per Amortizing Note will be paid in cash and will constitute a partial repayment of principal and a payment of interest, computed at an annual rate of 7.00%. Interest will be calculated on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. Payments will be applied first to the interest due and payable and then to the reduction of the unpaid principal amount, allocated as set forth in the indenture.

The indenture for the Amortizing Notes limits, among other things, the ability of the Company to consolidate, merge, sell, or dispose all or substantially all of its assets. If a fundamental change occurs, or if the Company elects to settle the prepaid stock purchase contracts early, then the holders of the Amortizing Notes will have the right to require the Company to repurchase the Amortizing Notes at a repurchase price equal to the principal amount of the Amortizing Notes as of the repurchase date (as described in the supplemental indenture) plus accrued and unpaid interest. The indenture also contains customary events of default which would permit the holders of the Amortizing Notes to declare those Amortizing Notes to be immediately due and payable if not cured within applicable grace periods, including the failure to make timely installment payments on the Amortizing Notes or other material indebtedness aggregating $100 million or more, the failure to satisfy covenants, and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency.

Forward Capacity Agreements

On the Merger Date, the Company assumed the obligation of Dynegy's agreements under which a portion of the PJM capacity that cleared for Planning Years 2018-2019, 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 was sold to a financial institution (Forward Capacity Agreements). The buyer in this transaction will receive capacity payments from PJM during the Planning Years 2018-2019, 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 in the amounts of $5 million, $121 million and $110 million, respectively. We will continue to be subject to the performance obligations as well as any associated performance penalties and bonus payments for those planning years. As a result, this transaction is accounted for as long-term debt of $236 million with an implied interest rate of 4.00%.

Equipment Financing Agreements

On the Merger Date, the Company assumed Dynegy's Equipment Financing Agreements. Under certain of our contractual service agreements in which we receive maintenance and capital improvements for our gas-fueled generation fleet, we have obtained parts and equipment intended to increase the output, efficiency and availability of our generation units. We have financed these parts and equipment under agreements with maturities ranging from 2019 to 2026. The portion of future payments attributable to principal will be classified as cash outflows from financing activities, and the portion of future payments attributable to interest will be classified as cash outflows from operating activities in our statements of consolidated cash flows.


Maturities — Long-term debt maturities at December 31, 20182020 are as follows:
December 31, 2020
2021$98 
202244 
202340 
20241,540 
20252,470 
Thereafter5,206 
Unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs(68)
Total long-term debt, including amounts due currently$9,330 

133
 December 31, 2018
2019$191
2020205
2021129
20221,782
20234,150
Thereafter4,453
Unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs155
Total long-term debt, including amounts due currently$11,065
Table of Contents

12.LEASES
Predecessor

DIP Roll Facilities — In August 2016, the Predecessor entered into the DIP Roll Facilities. The facilities providedVistra has both finance and operating leases for real estate, rail cars and equipment. Our leases have remaining lease terms for 1 to 37 years. Our leases include options to renew up to $4.250 billion in senior secured, super-priority financing. 15 years. Certain leases also contain options to terminate the lease.

Lease Cost

The DIP Roll Facilities were senior, secured, super-priority debtor-in-possession credit agreements byfollowing table presents costs related to lease activities:
Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Operating lease cost$14 $14 
Finance lease:
Finance lease right-of-use asset amortization7 4 
Interest on lease liabilities7 4 
Total finance lease cost14 8 
Variable lease cost (a)29 26 
Short-term lease cost31 19 
Sublease income (b)(8)(8)
Net lease cost$80 $59 
____________
(a)Represents coal stockpile management services, common area maintenance services and amongrail car payments based on the TCEH Debtors, the lenders that were party thereto from timenumber of rail cars used.
(b)Represents sublease income related to timereal estate leases.

Balance Sheet Information

The following table presents lease related balance sheet information:
December 31,
20202019
Lease assets:
Operating lease right-of-use assets$45 $44 
Finance lease right-of-use assets (net of accumulated depreciation)182 $59 
Total lease right-of-use assets227 103 
Current lease liabilities:
Operating lease liabilities8 14 
Finance lease liabilities8 8 
Total current lease liabilities16 22 
Noncurrent lease liabilities:
Operating lease liabilities40 41 
Finance lease liabilities206 78 
Total noncurrent lease liabilities246 119 
Total lease liabilities$262 $141 


Table of Contents
Cash Flows and an administrativeOther Information

The following table presents lease related cash flows and collateral agent. On the Effective Date, the DIP Roll Facilities converted to the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities discussed above. Net proceeds from the DIP Roll Facilities totaled $3.465 billion and were used to repay $2.65 billion outstanding borrowings under the former DIP Facility, fund a $650 million collateral account used to backstop issuancesother information:
Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases$17 $17 
Operating cash flows from finance leases5 4 
Finance cash flows from finance leases10 4 
Non-cash disclosure upon commencement of new lease:
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities14 95 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new finance lease liabilities108 13 
Non-cash disclosure upon modification of existing lease:
Modification of operating lease right-of-use assets(1)(41)
Modification of finance lease right-of-use assets23 50 

Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term

The following table presents weighted average remaining lease term information:
December 31,
20202019
Weighted average remaining lease term:
Operating lease12.3 years7.5 years
Finance lease24.2 years16.2 years
Weighted average discount rate:
Operating lease5.80%5.34 %
Finance lease4.92%5.84 %

Maturity of lettersLease Liabilities

The following table presents maturity of credit and pay $107lease liabilities:
Operating LeaseFinance LeaseTotal Lease
2021$11 $14 $25 
20228 20 28 
20239 19 28 
20245 19 24 
20253 19 22 
Thereafter41 385 426 
Total lease payments77 476 553 
Less: Interest(29)(262)(291)
Present value of lease liabilities$48 $214 $262 

As of December 31, 2020, we have approximately $7 million of issuance costs. The remaining balance was used for general corporate purposes. Additionally, $800 millionoperating leases that have not yet commenced.


Table of cash from collateral accounts under the former DIP Facility that was used to backstop letters of credit was released to the Predecessor to be used for general corporate purposes.Contents

13.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
DIP Facility — The DIP Facility provided for up to $3.375 billion in senior secured, super-priority financing. The DIP Facility was a senior, secured, super-priority credit agreement by and among the TCEH Debtors, the lenders that were party thereto from time to time and an administrative and collateral agent. As discussed above, in August 2016, all outstanding amounts under the DIP Facility were repaid using proceeds from the DIP Roll Facilities.


15.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


Contractual Commitments


At December 31, 2018,2020, we had contractual commitments under long-term service and maintenance contracts, energy-related contracts, leases and other agreements as follows.
Long-Term Service and Maintenance ContractsCoal purchase and
transportation agreements		Pipeline transportation and storage reservation feesNuclear
Fuel Contracts		Other
Contracts
2021$165 $516 $100 $92 $256 
2022186 47 73 43 49 
2023137 34 49 57 29 
2024142 36 36 40 24 
2025170 37 30 36 11 
Thereafter1,824 79 111 107 80 
Total$2,624 $749 $399 $375 $449 
 Long-Term Service and Maintenance Contracts 
Coal purchase and
transportation agreements
 Pipeline transportation and storage reservation fees 
Nuclear
Fuel Contracts
 
Other
Contracts
2019$175
 $765
 $101
 $69
 $101
2020181
 227
 95
 71
 74
2021135
 118
 72
 58
 20
2022183
 103
 48
 38
 13
2023133
 64
 35
 46
 9
Thereafter2,619
 186
 145
 155
 68
Total$3,426
 $1,463
 $496
 $437
 $285


The table above excludes TRA and pension and OPEB plan obligations due to the uncertainty in the timing of those payments.


Expenditures under our coal purchase and coal transportation agreements totaled $845 million, $1.092 billion, and $955 million $416 million, $109 million and $139 million for the Successor period for the years ended December 31, 20182020, 2019 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016,2018, respectively.

At December 31, 2018, future minimum lease payments under operating leases are as follows:
 Operating Leases (a)
2019$35
202029
202125
202220
202319
Thereafter168
Total future minimum lease payments$296
___________
(a)Includes operating leases with initial or remaining noncancellable lease terms in excess of one year.


Rent reported as operating costs fuel costs and SG&A expenses totaled $74$111 million, $69 million, $20$89 million, and $39$74 million for the Successor period for the years ended December 31, 20182020, 2019 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016,2018, respectively.


Guarantees


We have entered into contracts including the assumed Dynegy senior notes described above, that contain guarantees to unaffiliated parties that could require performance or payment under certain conditions. As of December 31, 2018,2020, there are no material outstanding claims related to our guarantee obligations, and we do not anticipate we will be required to make any material payments under these guarantees.guarantees in the near term.



Letters of Credit


At December 31, 2018,2020, we had outstanding letters of credit under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities totaling $1.365$1.286 billion as follows:


•$1.185 billion878 million to support commodity risk management collateral requirements in the normal course of business, including over-the-counter and exchange-traded transactions and collateral postings with ISOs or ISOs/RTOs;
•$53190 million to support battery and solar development projects;
•$34 million to support executory contracts and insurance agreements;
•$55102 million to support our REP financial requirements with the PUCT,PUCT; and
•$7282 million for other credit support requirements.


Surety Bonds


At December 31, 2018,2020, we had outstanding surety bonds totaling $31$100 million to support performance under various contracts and legal obligations in the normal course of business.


136
Table of Contents
Litigation and Regulatory Proceedings


Our material legal proceedings and regulatory proceedings affecting our business are described below. We believe that we have valid defenses to the legal proceedings described below and intend to defend them vigorously. We also intend to participate in the regulatory processes described below. We record reserves for estimated losses related to these matters when information available indicates that a loss is probable and the amount of the loss, or range of loss, can be reasonably estimated. As applicable, we have established an adequate reserve for the matters discussed below. In addition, legal costs are expensed as incurred. Management has assessed each of the following legal matters based on current information and made a judgment concerning its potential outcome, considering the nature of the claim, the amount and nature of damages sought, and the probability of success. Unless specified below, we are unable to predict the outcome of these matters or reasonably estimate the scope or amount of any associated costs and potential liabilities, but they could have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity, or financial condition. As additional information becomes available, we adjust our assessment and estimates of such contingencies accordingly. Because litigation and rulemaking proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties and unfavorable rulings or developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters could be at amounts that are different from our currently recorded reserves and that such differences could be material.

Gas Index Pricing Litigation — We, through our subsidiaries, and other energy companies are named as defendants in several lawsuits claiming damages resulting from alleged price manipulation through false reporting of natural gas prices to various index publications, wash trading and churn trading from 2000-2002. The plaintiffs in these cases allege that the defendants engaged in an antitrust conspiracy to inflate natural gas prices in three states (Kansas, Missouri and Wisconsin) during the relevant time period and seek damages under the respective state antitrust statutes. Four of the cases areWe remain as defendants in 2 consolidated putative class actions (Wisconsin) and one case, Reorganized FLI (nka J.P. Morgan Trust Co., National Assn.) v. Oneok Inc., et al., is an1 individual action on behalf of Farmland Industries, Inc. (Farmland), with Farmland seeking full consideration damages (i.e., the full amount it paid for natural gas purchases during the relevant timeframe). The cases are consolidated in a multi-district litigation proceeding(Kansas) both pending in federal court in those states. The Kansas action is currently on appeal in the U. S. District Court for Nevada. In March 2017, the court denied the class plaintiffs' motions to certify class actions in each of the states, which decision was taken on an interlocutory appeal to U.SU.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ninth Circuit Court). In August 2018, the Ninth Circuit Court vacated the district court orders denying class certification and remanded the cases to the district court for further consideration of the class certification issue. In September 2018, the defendants filed a joint motion for entry of an order denying class certification, and the plaintiffs filed a motion for remand of the cases to the transferor courts to decide class certification issues. In January 2019, the judge issued an order remanding the consolidated cases in the multi-district proceedings back to their respective courts of origin. Along with the other defendants, we had previously reached settlement terms in the Kansas and Missouri cases, and plaintiffs in those cases filed a Notice of Settlement with the judge in the multi-district court proceeding. As for the Farmland matter, in March 2018, the Ninth Circuit Court reversed a summary judgment in favor of the defendants and it shortly will be remanded for further discovery and other pretrial proceedings. While we cannot predict the outcome of these legal proceedings, or estimate a range of costs, they could have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.Tenth Circuit.


Advatech Dispute — In September 2016, Illinois Power Generating Company (Genco), terminated its Second Amended and Restated Newton Flue Gas Desulfurization System Engineering, Procurement, Construction and Commissioning Services Contract dated as of December 15, 2014 with Advatech, LLC (Advatech). Advatech issued Genco its final invoice in September 2016 totaling $81 million. Genco contested the invoice in October 2016 and believes the proper amount is less than $1 million. In October 2016, Advatech initiated the dispute resolution process under the contract and filed for arbitration in March 2017. Settlement discussions required under the dispute resolution process were unsuccessful. The arbitration hearing occurred in October 2018, and the arbitration panel has not yet issued an award. We dispute the allegations. While we cannot predict the outcome of this legal proceeding, or estimate a range of costs, it could have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.

Wood River Rail Dispute — In November 2017, Dynegy Midwest Generation, LLC (DMG) received notification that BNSF Railway Company and Norfolk Southern Railway Company were initiating dispute resolution related to DMG's suspension of its Wood River Rail Transportation Agreement with the railroads. Settlement discussions required under the dispute resolution process have been unsuccessful. In March 2018, BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) and Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NS) filed a demand for arbitration. Thearbitration and an arbitration hearing onis currently scheduled for March 2021.

Coffeen and Duck Creek Rail Disputes — In April 2020, IPH, LLC (IPH) received notification that BNSF and NS were initiating dispute resolution related to IPH's suspension of its Coffeen Rail Transportation Agreement with the merits is schedulerailroads, and Illinois Power Resources Generating, LLC (IPRG), received notification that BNSF was initiating dispute resolution related to IPRG's suspension of its Duck Creek Rail Transportation Agreement with BNSF. In November 2019, IPH and IPRG sent suspension notices to the railroads asserting that the MPS rule requirement to retire at least 2,000 megawatts of generation (see discussion below) was a change-in-law under the agreement that rendered continued operation of the plants no longer economically feasible. In addition, IPH and IPRG asserted that the MPS rule's retirement requirement also qualified as a force majeure event under the agreements excusing performance.

ME2C Patent Dispute — In July 2019, Midwest Energy Emissions Corporation and MES Inc. (collectively, the plaintiffs) filed a patent infringement complaint in federal court in Delaware against numerous parties, including Vistra and some of its subsidiaries (collectively, the Vistra defendants), and its amended complaint in July 2020. The amended complaint alleges that the Vistra defendants infringed 5 patents owned by the plaintiffs by using specific processes for February 2020. We disputemercury control at certain coal-fueled plants. The amended complaint seeks injunctive relief and unspecified damages. In July 2020, the railroads' allegationsplaintiffs and will defend our position vigorously. While we cannot predict the outcomeVistra defendants entered into an agreement resolving all the claims alleged against the Vistra defendants in the complaint. The court signed its stipulation and order of dismissal in July 2020, dismissing the Vistra defendants from the lawsuit.

137
Table of Contents
Climate Change

In January 2021, the Biden administration issued a series of Executive Orders, including one titled Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis (the Environment Executive Order) which directed agencies, including the EPA, to review various agency actions promulgated during the prior administration and take action where the previous administration's action conflicts with national objectives. Several of the EPA agency actions discussed below are now subject to this legal proceeding, or estimate a range of costs, it could have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.review.



Greenhouse Gas Emissions


In August 2015, the EPA finalized rules to address greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from new, modified and reconstructed and existing electricity generation units, referred to as the Clean Power Plan, including rules for existing facilities that would establish state-specific emissions rate goals to reduce nationwide CO2 emissions. Various parties (including Luminant) filed petitions for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit Court) and subsequently,. In July 2019, petitioners filed a joint motion to dismiss in January 2016, a coalitionlight of states, industry (including Luminant) and other parties filed applications with the U.S. Supreme Court (Supreme Court) askingEPA's new rule that replaces the Supreme Court stayClean Power Plan, the Affordable Clean Energy rule, whilediscussed below. In September 2019, the D.C. Circuit Court reviews the legalitygranted petitioners' motion to dismiss and dismissed all of the rule for existing plants. In February 2016, the Supreme Court stayed the rule pending the conclusion of legal challenges on the rule before the D.C. Circuit Court and until the Supreme Court disposes of any subsequent petition for review. Oral argument on the merits of the legal challenges to the rule was heard in September 2016 before the entire D.C. Circuit Court, but the D.C. Circuit Court has not issued a decision and the case remains in abeyance due to the EPA's decision to reviewpetitions challenging the Clean Power Plan.Plan as moot.


In October 2017,July 2019, the EPA issuedfinalized a proposed rule that wouldto repeal the Clean Power Plan, with new regulations addressing GHG emissions from existing coal-fueled electric generation units, referred to as the proposedAffordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule. The ACE rule develops emission guidelines that states must use when developing plans to regulate GHG emissions from existing coal-fueled electric generating units. The ACE rule set a deadline of July 2022 for states to submit their plans for regulating GHG emissions from existing facilities. States where we operate coal plants (Texas, Illinois and Ohio) have begun the development of their state plans to comply with the rule. Environmental groups and certain states filed petitions for review of the ACE rule and the repeal focusing on what the EPA believes to be the unlawful nature of the Clean Power Plan in the D.C. Circuit Court, and askingthe D.C. Circuit Court heard argument on those issues in October 2020. In January 2021, the D.C. Circuit Court vacated the ACE rule and remanded the rule to the EPA for public comment onfurther action. In its decision, the D.C. Circuit Court concluded that the EPA's interpretations of its authority underbasis for repealing the Clean Power Plan and adopting the ACE rule was not supported by the Clean Air Act. In December 2017, the EPA published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) soliciting information from the public as the EPA considers proposing a future rule. Vistra Energy submitted comments on the ANPRAdditionally, in February 2018. Vistra Energy submitted comments on the proposed repeal in April 2018. In August 2018, the EPA published a proposed replacement rule called the Affordable Clean Energy rule. We submitted comments on the proposed Affordable Clean Energy rule in October 2018. In December 2018, the EPA issued proposed revisions to the emission standards for new, modified and reconstructed units withunits. Vistra submitted comments dueon that proposed rulemaking in March 2019. While we cannot predictIn January 2021, the outcomeEPA, just prior to the transition to the Biden administration, issued a final rule setting forth a significant contribution finding for the purpose of these rulemakingsregulating GHG emissions from new, modified, or reconstructed electric utility generating units. The final rule excludes sectors from future regulation where GHG emissions make up less than three percent of U.S. GHG emissions. The final rule did not set any specific emission limits for new, modified, or reconstructed electric utility generating units. The ACE rule and related legal proceedings, or estimate a range of reasonably probable costs, if the rulesrule on significant contribution are ultimately implemented or upheld as they were issued, they could have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.subject to the Environment Executive Order discussed above.


Regional Haze — Reasonable Progress and Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) for Texas


In January 2016,October 2017, the EPA issued a final rule approving in part and disapproving in part Texas's 2009 State Implementation Plan (SIP) as it relates to the reasonable progress component of the Regional Haze Program and issuing a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP). The EPA's emission limits in the FIP assume additional control equipment for specific lignite/coal-fueled generation units across Texas, including new flue gas desulfurization systems (scrubbers) at seven electricity generation units (including Big Brown Units 1 and 2, Monticello Units 1 and 2 and Coleto Creek) and upgrades to existing scrubbers at seven generation units (including Martin Lake Units 1, 2 and 3, Monticello Unit 3 and Sandow Unit 4).

In March 2016, Luminant and a number of other parties, including the State of Texas, filed petitions for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Fifth Circuit Court) challenging the FIP's Texas requirements. In July 2016, the Fifth Circuit Court granted motions to stay the rule filed by Luminant and the other parties pending final review of the petitions for review. In December 2016, the EPA filed a motion seeking a voluntary remand of the rule back to the EPA for further consideration of Luminant's pending request for administrative reconsideration. In March 2017, the Fifth Circuit Court remanded the rule back to the EPA for reconsideration. The stay of the rule (and the emission control requirements) remains in effect, and the EPA is required to file status reports of its reconsideration every 60 days. The retirements of our Monticello, Big Brown and Sandow 4 plants should have a favorable impact on this rulemaking and litigation. While we cannot predict the outcome of the rulemaking and legal proceedings, or estimate a range of reasonably possible costs, the result could have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.


In September 2017, the EPA signed a final rule addressing BART for Texas electricity generation units, with the rule serving as a partial approval of Texas'sTexas' 2009 SIPState Implementation Plan (SIP) and a partial FIP.Federal Implementation Plan (FIP). For SO2, the rule createsestablished an intrastate Texas emission allowance trading program as a "BART alternative" that operates in a similar fashion to a CSAPR trading program. The program includes 39 generating units (including our Martin Lake, Big Brown, Monticello, Sandow 4, Coleto Creek, Stryker 2 and Graham 2 plants). The compliance obligations in the program started on January 1, 2019, and the identified units receive an annual allowance allocation that is equal to their most recent annual CSAPR SO2 allocation. Cumulatively, our units covered by the program are allocated 100,279 allowances annually. Under the rule, a unit that is listed that does not operate for two consecutive years starting after 2018 would no longer receive allowances after the fifth year of non-operation. We believe the2019. The retirements of our Monticello, Big Brown and Sandow 4 plants will enhancehave enhanced our ability to comply with this BART rule for SO2. For NOX, the rule adoptsadopted the CSAPR's ozone program as BART and for particulate matter, the rule approvesapproved Texas's SIP that determines that no electricity generation units are subject to BART for particulate matter. The National Parks Conservation Association, the Sierra Club and the Environmental Defense FundVarious parties filed a petition challenging the rule in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Court(Fifth Circuit Court) as well as a petition for reconsideration filed with the EPA. Luminant intervened on behalf of the EPA in the Fifth Circuit Court action. In March 2018, the Fifth Circuit Court granted a joint motion filed byabated its proceedings pending conclusion of the EPA and the environmental groups involved to abate the Fifth Circuit Court proceedings until the EPA has taken action on the reconsideration petition and concludes theEPA's reconsideration process. In August 2018,2020, the EPA issued a proposedfinal rule affirming the prior BART final rule but also included additional revisions that were proposed in November 2019. In October 2020, environmental groups petitioned for review of this rule in both the D.C. Circuit Court and seeking commentsthe Fifth Circuit Court. Briefing is underway on the proper venue for any challenge to the final rule. As finalized, we expect that proposal, which were due in October 2018. While we cannot predictwill be able to comply with the outcomerule. The BART rule is subject to the Environment Executive Order discussed above.

138
Table of the rulemaking and legal proceedings, we believe the rule, if ultimately implemented or upheld as issued, will not have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.Contents

Affirmative Defenses During Malfunctions


In February 2013, the EPA proposed a rule requiring certain states to remove SIP exemptions for excess emissions during malfunctions or replace them with an affirmative defense. In May 2015, the EPA finalized its 2013 proposal to extend the EPA's proposed findings of inadequacy to states that have affirmative defense provisions, including Texas. The finala rule impactedrequiring 36 states, including Texas, Illinois and Ohio, in which we operate. The EPA's final rule would require covered states to remove or replace either EPA-approved exemptions or affirmative defense provisions for excess emissions during upset events and unplanned maintenance and startup and shutdown and maintenance events. Several statesevents, referred to as the SIP Call. Various parties (including Luminant, the State of Texas and the State of Ohio) and various industry parties (including Luminant) filed petitions for review of the EPA's final rule, and all of those petitions were consolidated in the D.C. Circuit Court. Before the oral argument was held, inIn April 2017, the D.C. Circuit Court grantedordered the EPA's motioncase to continue oral argument and ordered that the case be held in abeyance withabeyance. In April 2019, the EPA Region 6 proposed a rule to provide status reportswithdraw the SIP Call with respect to the Texas affirmative defense provisions. We submitted comments on that proposed rulemaking in June 2019. In February 2020, the EPA issued the final rule withdrawing the Texas SIP Call. In April 2020, a group of environmental petitioners, including the Sierra Club, filed a petition in the D.C. Circuit Court challenging the EPA's action with respect to Texas. Briefing is currently underway in the challenge to the EPA's action with respect to Texas. In October 2020, the EPA issued new guidance on the EPA's reviewinclusion of startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM) provisions in SIPs, which is intended to supersede the action at 90-day intervals. policy in the multi-state SIP Call. The guidance provides that the SIPs may contain provisions for SSM events if certain conditions are met. The EPA SSM guidance is subject to the Environment Executive Order discussed above.

Illinois Multi-Pollutant Standards (MPS)

In October 2018,August 2019, changes proposed by the EPA partially granted Texas' petition for reconsideration ofIllinois Pollution Control Board to the Texas SIP call. We cannot predictMPS rule, which places NOX, SO2 and mercury emissions limits on our coal plants located in MISO went into effect. Under the timing or outcome of this proceeding, or estimate a range of reasonably possible costs, but implementation ofrevised MPS rule, our allowable SO2 and NOX emissions from the MISO fleet are 48% and 42% lower, respectively, than prior to the rule as finalized could have a material impact onchanges. The revised MPS rule requires the continuous operation of existing selective catalytic reduction (SCR) control systems during the ozone season, requires SCR-controlled units to meet an ozone season NOX emission rate limit, and set an additional, site-specific annual SO2 limit for our resultsJoppa Power Station. Additionally, in 2019, the Company retired its Havana, Hennepin, Coffeen and Duck Creek plants in order to comply with the MPS rule's requirement to retire at least 2,000 MW of operations, liquidity or financial condition.our generation in MISO. See Note 4 for information regarding the retirement of these four plants.


SO2Designations for Texas


In November 2016, the EPA finalized its nonattainment designations for counties surrounding our Big Brown, Monticello and Martin Lake generation plants. The final designations require Texas to develop nonattainment plans for these areas. In February 2017, the State of Texas and Luminant filed challenges to the nonattainment designations in the Fifth Circuit Court. Subsequently, in October 2017, the Fifth Circuit Court granted the EPA's motion to hold the case in abeyance considering the EPA's representation that it intended to revisit the nonattainment rule. In December 2017, the TCEQ submitted a petition for reconsideration to the EPA. In addition,August 2019, the EPA issued a proposed Error Correction Rule for all three areas, which, if finalized, would revise its previous nonattainment designations and each area at issue would be designated unclassifiable. In September 2019, we submitted comments in support of the proposed Error Correction Rule. In April 2020, the Sierra Club filed suit to compel the EPA to issue a Finding of Failure to submit an attainment plan with respect to Monticello andthe three areas in Texas. In August 2020, the EPA issued a Finding of Failure for Texas to submit an attainment plan. In September 2020, the EPA proposed a "Clean Data" determination for the areas surrounding the retired Big Brown and Monticello plants, which, if finalized, would redesignate those areas as attainment based on monitoring data supporting an attainment designation. We expect the retirement of those plants should favorably impact our legal challengeTCEQ to develop a SIP for Texas for submittal to the nonattainment designationsEPA in that the nonattainment designations for Freestone County and Titus County are based solely on the Sierra Club modeling, which we dispute,2021.

139
Table of SO2 emissions from Monticello and Big Brown. Regardless, considering these retirements, the nonattainment designations for those counties are no longer supported. While we cannot predict the outcome of this matter, or estimate a range of reasonably possible costs, the result could have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.Contents

Effluent Limitation Guidelines (ELGs)


In November 2015, the EPA revised the ELGs for steam electricity generation facilities, which will impose more stringent standards (as individual permits are renewed) for wastewater streams, such as flue gas desulfurization (FGD), fly ash, bottom ash and flue gas mercury control.control wastewaters. Various parties filed petitions for review of the ELG rule, and the petitions were consolidated in the Fifth Circuit Court. In April 2017, the EPA granted petitions requesting reconsideration of the ELG final rule issued in 2015 and administratively stayed the ELG rule's compliance date deadlines pending ongoing judicialdeadlines. In August 2017, the EPA announced that its reconsideration of the ELG rule would be limited to a review of the rule. The legal challenges pertainingeffluent limitations applicable to FGD and bottom ash transport water, flue gas desulfurization wastewaterwastewaters and gasification wastewater have been suspended while the EPA reconsiders the rules.


The EPA issued a final rule in September 2017 postponingagency subsequently postponed the earliest compliance dates in the ELG rule for the application of effluent limitations for FGD and bottom ash transport water and flue-gas desulfurization wastewater by two years,wastewaters from November 1, 2018 to November 1, 2020.

Given Based on these administrative developments, the Fifth Circuit Court agreed to sever and hold in abeyance challenges to effluent limitations. The remainder of the case proceeded, and in April 2019 the Fifth Circuit Court vacated and remanded portions of the EPA's decisionELG rule pertaining to reconsidereffluent limitations for legacy wastewater and leachate. In November 2019, the EPA issued a proposal that would extend the compliance deadline for FGD wastewater to no later than December 31, 2025 and maintains the December 31, 2023 compliance date for bottom ash transport water. The proposal also creates new sub-categories of facilities with more flexible FGD compliance options, including a retirement exemption to 2028 and a low utilization boiler exemption. The proposed rule also modified some of the FGD final effluent limitations. We filed comments on the proposal in January 2020. The EPA published the final rule in October 2020. The final rule extends the compliance date for both FGD and bottom ash transport water and flue gas desulfurization wastewater provisionsto no later than December 2025, as negotiated with the state permitting agency. Additionally, the final rule allows for a retirement exemption that exempts facilities certifying that units will retire by December 2028 provided certain effluent limitations are met. Notification to the state agency on the retirement exemption is due by October 2021. In November 2020, environmental groups petitioned for review of the new ELG rule, the rule postponing the ELG rule's earliest compliance dates for those provisions,revisions, and the intertwined relationshipVistra subsidiaries filed a motion to intervene in support of the ELGEPA in December 2020. The final rule withis subject to the Environment Executive Order discussed above.

Coal Combustion Residuals rule discussed below, which is also being reconsidered by the EPA, as well as pending legal challenges concerning both rules, substantial uncertainty exists regarding our projected capital expenditures for ELG compliance, including the timing of such expenditures. While we cannot predict the outcome of this matter, or estimate a range of costs, it could have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.

New Source Review and CAA Matters

New Source Review — Since 1999, the EPA has engaged in a nationwide enforcement initiative to determine whether coal-fueled power plants failed to comply with the requirements of the New Source Review (NSR) and New Source Performance Standard provisions under the CAA when the plants implemented changes. The EPA's NSR initiative focuses on whether projects performed at power plants triggered various permitting requirements, including the need to install pollution control equipment.

In August 2013, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), acting as the attorneys for the EPA, filed a civil enforcement lawsuit against Luminant in federal district court in Dallas, alleging violations of the CAA, including its NSR standards, at our Big Brown and Martin Lake generation facilities. The lawsuit requests (i) the maximum civil penalties available under the CAA to the government of up to $32,500 to $37,500 per day for each alleged violation, depending on the date of the alleged violation, and (ii) injunctive relief, including an order to apply for pre-construction permits which may require the installation of best available control technology at the affected units. In August 2015, the district court granted Luminant's motion to dismiss seven of the nine claims asserted by the EPA in the lawsuit.

In January 2017, the EPA dismissed its two remaining claims with prejudice and the district court entered final judgment in Luminant's favor. In March 2017, the EPA and the Sierra Club appealed the final judgment to the Fifth Circuit Court. After the parties filed their respective briefs in the Fifth Circuit Court, the appeal was argued before the Fifth Circuit Court in March 2018. In October 2018, the Fifth Circuit Court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the district court. The Fifth Circuit Court's decision held that the district court properly dismissed all of the civil penalties as time-barred. The Fifth Circuit Court further held that the grounds cited by the district court did not support dismissal of the injunctive relief claims at this early stage of the case and remanded the case back to the district court for further consideration. In November 2018, we filed a petition for rehearing en banc on two issues and the EPA's response to that petition is due in February 2019. We believe that we have complied with all requirements of the CAA and intend to continue to vigorously defend against the remaining allegations. An adverse outcome could require substantial capital expenditures that cannot be determined at this time or retirement of the remaining plant at issue, Martin Lake. The retirement of the Big Brown plant should have a favorable impact on this litigation. We cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings, including the financial effects, if any.

Zimmer NOVs — In December 2014, the EPA issued a notice of violation (NOV) alleging violation of opacity standards at the Zimmer facility. The EPA previously had issued NOVs to Zimmer in 2008 and 2010 alleging violations of the CAA, the Ohio State Implementation Plan and the station's air permits including standards applicable to opacity, sulfur dioxide, sulfuric acid mist and heat input. The NOVs remain unresolved. We are unable to predict the outcome of these matters.

Edwards CAA Citizen Suit — In April 2013, environmental groups filed a CAA citizen suit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois alleging violations of opacity and particulate matter limits at our MISO segment's Edwards facility. In August 2016, the district court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on certain liability issues. We filed a motion seeking interlocutory appeal of the court's summary judgment ruling. In February 2017, the appellate court denied our motion for interlocutory appeal. The parties completed briefing on motions for summary judgment on remedy issues in October 2018. In January 2019, the court canceled the bench trial scheduled for March 2019 and denied the parties' motions for summary judgment on remedy issues. In February 2019, the court issued an order that anticipates a trial date at the end of September 2019. We dispute the allegations and will defend the case vigorously. We are unable to predict the outcome of these matters.

Ultimate resolution of any of these CAA matters could have a material adverse impact on our future financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. A resolution could result in increased capital expenditures for the installation of pollution control equipment, increased operations and maintenance expenses, and penalties, or could result in an order or a decision to retire these plants. While we cannot predict the outcome of these legal proceedings, or estimate a range of costs, they could have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.


Coal Combustion Residuals/(CCR)/Groundwater


In July 2018, the EPA published a final rule, which became effective in August 2018, that amends certain provisions of the Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR)CCR rule that the agency issued in 2015. TheAmong other changes, the 2018 revisions extendextended closure deadlines to October 31, 2020, related to the aquifer location restriction and groundwater monitoring requirements. The 2018 revisions also (1) establish groundwater protection standards for cobalt, lithium, molybdenum and lead (2) allow authorized state programs to waive groundwater monitoring requirements when there is a demonstration of no potential for contaminant migration, and (3) allow the permitting authority to issue certificationsAlso, in lieu of a qualified professional engineer. The 2018 revisions became effective in August 2018, and we are continuing to evaluate the impact on our CCR facilities. Also, on August 21, 2018, the D.C. Circuit Court issued a decision that vacates and remands certain provisions of the 2015 CCR rule.rule, including an applicability exemption for legacy impoundments. In December 2019, the EPA issued a proposed rule containing a revised closure deadline for unlined CCR impoundments and new procedures for seeking extensions of that revised closure deadline. We filed comments on the proposal in January 2020. In August 2020, the EPA issued a rule finalizing the December 2019 proposal, establishing a deadline of April 11, 2021 to cease receipt of waste and initiate closure at unlined CCR impoundments. The EPAfinal rule allows a generation plant to seek the EPA's approval to extend this deadline if no alternative disposal capacity is expectedavailable and either a conversion to undertake further revisions to itscomply with the CCR regulations in responserule is underway or retirement will occur by either 2023 or 2028 (depending on the size of the impoundment at issue). Prior to the D.C. Circuit Court's ruling.November 2020 deadline, we submitted applications to the EPA requesting compliance extensions under both conversion and retirement scenarios. In October 2018, theNovember 2020, environmental groups petitioned for review of this rule that extends certain closure deadlines to 2020 was challenged in the D.C. Circuit Court. In December 2018, the EPACourt, and petitioners filed cross-motions, with the EPA seeking remand without vacatur and petitioners seeking a partial stay or vacatur of the rule. We have intervened in the litigation andVistra subsidiaries filed a motion to intervene in support of the EPA. Briefing onEPA in December 2020. Also, in November 2020, the cross-motions is ongoing. WhileEPA finalized a rule that would allow an alternative liner demonstration for certain qualifying facilities. In November 2020, we cannot predictsubmitted an alternate liner demonstration for one CCR unit at Martin Lake. In October 2020, the impactsEPA published an advanced notice of theseproposed rulemaking requesting information to inform the EPA in the development of a rule revisions (including whether and if so how the states in which we operate will utilize the authority delegatedto address legacy impoundments that existed prior to the states through2015 CCR regulation as required by the revisions), or estimate a range of reasonably possible costs relatedAugust 2018 D.C. Circuit Court decision. We filed comments on this proposal in February 2021. The rules on revised closure deadlines and alternative liner demonstrations are subject to these revisions, the changes that result from these revisions could have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.Environment Executive Order discussed above.


MISO Segment — In 2012, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) issued violation notices alleging violations of groundwater standards onsite at our Baldwin and Vermilion facilities' CCR surface impoundments. InThese violation notices remain unresolved; however, in 2016, the IEPA approved our closure and post-closure care plans for the Baldwin old east, east, and west fly ash CCR surface impoundments. We are working towards implementation of those closure plans.


140
Table of Contents
At our retired Vermilion facility, which was not subject to the EPA's 2015 CCR rule until the aforementioned D.C. Circuit Court decision in August 2018, court decision, we submitted proposed corrective action plans involving closure of two2 CCR surface impoundments (i.e., the old east and the north impoundments) to the IEPA in 2012, withand we submitted revised plans submitted in 2014. In May 2017, in response to a request from the IEPA for additional information regarding the closure of these Vermilion surface impoundments, we agreed to perform additional groundwater sampling and closure options and riverbank stabilizing options. By letter dated January 31,In May 2018, Prairie Rivers Network provided 60-day notice of its intent to sue our subsidiary Dynegy Midwest Generation, LLC under the federal Clean Water Act for alleged unauthorized discharges from the surface impoundments at our Vermilion facility and alleged related violations of the facility's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. Prairie Rivers Network filed a citizen suit in May 2018,federal court in Illinois against DMG, alleging violations of the Clean Water Act for alleged unauthorized discharges. In August 2018, we filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. In November 2018, the district court granted our motion to dismiss and judgment was entered in our favor. Plaintiffs have appealed the judgment to the U.SU.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. We disputeSeventh Circuit and argument was heard in November 2020. In April 2019, PRN also filed a complaint against DMG before the allegationsIPCB, alleging that groundwater flows allegedly associated with the ash impoundments at the Vermilion site have resulted in exceedances both of surface water standards and will vigorously defend our position.Illinois groundwater standards dating back to 1992. This matter is in the very early stages.


In 2012, the IEPA issued violation notices alleging violations of groundwater standards at the Newton and Coffeen facilities' CCR surface impoundments. We are addressing these CCR surface impoundments in accordance with the federal CCR rule. In June 2018, the IEPA issued a violation notice for alleged seep discharges claimed to be coming from the surface impoundments at our retired Vermilion facility.facility and that notice has since been referred to the Illinois Attorney General.


In December 2018, the Sierra Club filed a complaint with the IPCB alleging the disposal and storage of coal ash at the Coffeen, Edwards and Joppa generation facilities are causing exceedances of the applicable groundwater standards.

In July 2019, coal ash disposal and storage legislation in Illinois was enacted. The legislation addresses state requirements for the proper closure of coal ash ponds in the state of Illinois. The law tasks the IEPA and the IPCB to set up a series of guidelines, rules and permit requirements for closure of ash ponds. In March 2020, the IEPA issued its proposed rule, and we expect the rulemaking process should be completed by early 2021. Under the proposed rule, coal ash impoundment owners would be required to submit a closure alternative analysis to the IEPA for the selection of the best method for coal ash remediation at a particular site. The proposed rule does not mandate closure by removal at any site. Public hearings for the proposed rule were held in August 2020 and September 2020. We disputeexpect that the allegations andrule will vigorously defend our position.be finalized by March 2021.


If remediationFor all of the above matters, if certain corrective action measures, concerningincluding groundwater treatment or removal of ash, are necessaryrequired at any of our coal-fueled facilities, we may incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. At this time, in part because ofUntil the revisions to the CCR rule thatIllinois coal ash rulemaking are finalized and we undertake further site specific evaluations required by each program we will not know the EPA published in July 2018 and the D.C. Circuit Court's vacatur and remand of certain provisions of the EPA's 2015 CCR rule, we cannot reasonably estimate the costs, orfull range of costs of groundwater remediation, if any, that ultimately may be required.required under those rules. However, the currently anticipated CCR surface impoundment and landfill closure costs, as determined bycontained in our AROs, reflect the costs of closure methods that our operations and environmental services teams believe are reflected in our AROs.appropriate and protective of the environment for each location.



MISO 2015-2016 Planning Resource Auction


In May 2015, three3 complaints were filed at FERC regarding the Zone 4 results for the 2015-2016 Planning Resource Auctionplanning resource auction (PRA) conducted by MISO. Dynegy is a named party in one1 of the complaints. The complainants, Public Citizen, Inc., the Illinois Attorney General and Southwestern Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Complainants), have challenged the results of the PRA as unjust and unreasonable, requested rate relief/refunds, and requested changes to the MISO PRAplanning resource auction structure going forward. Complainants have also alleged that Dynegy couldmay have engaged in economic or physical withholding in Zone 4 constituting market manipulation in the 2015-2016 PRA. The Independent Market Monitor for MISO (MISO IMM), which was responsible for monitoring the MISO 2015-2016 PRA, determined that all offers were competitive and that no physical or economic withholding occurred. The MISO IMM also stated, in a filing responding to the complaints, that there is no basis for the proposed remedies.remedies sought by the Complainants. We filed our Answeranswer to these complaints and believeexplaining that we complied fully with the terms of the MISO tariff in connection with the 2015-2016 PRA disputedand disputing the allegations, and will defend our actions vigorously. In addition, theallegations. The Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers filed a related complaint at FERC against MISO onin June 30, 2015 requesting prospective changes to the MISO tariff. Dynegy also responded to this complaint with respect to Dynegy's conduct alleged in the complaint.


OnIn October 1, 2015, FERC issued an order of non-public,nonpublic, formal investigation stating that shortly after the conclusion of the 2015-2016 PRA, FERC's Office of Enforcement began a non-public informal investigation(the investigation) into whether market manipulation or other potential violations of FERC orders, rules and regulations occurred before or during the PRA (the Order). The Order noted that the investigation is ongoing, and that the conversionPRA.

141
Table of the informal, non-public investigation to a formal, non-public investigation does not indicate that FERC has determined that any entity has engaged in market manipulation or otherwise violated any FERC order, rule, or regulation. Vistra Energy is participating in the investigation on behalf of Dynegy following the closing of the Merger. We believe that our conduct was proper and will defend our position vigorously, but we cannot predict the outcome of the investigation or the amount, if any, of loss that may result. While we cannot predict the outcome of this matter, or estimate a range of costs, it could have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.Contents

OnIn December 31, 2015, FERC issued an order on the complaints requiring a number of prospective changes to the MISO tariff provisions associated with calculating Initial Reference Levels and Local Clearing Requirements, effective as of the 2016-2017 PRA.planning resource auction. The order did not address the arguments of the complainantsComplainants regarding the 2015-2016 PRA and stated that those issues remainremained under consideration and willwould be addressed in a future order.


In July 2019, FERC issued an order denying the remaining issues raised by the complaints and noted that the investigation into Dynegy was closed. FERC found that Dynegy's conduct did not constitute market manipulation and the results of the PRA were just and reasonable because the PRA was conducted in accordance with MISO's tariff. With the issuance of the order, this matter has been resolved in Dynegy's favor. The request for rehearing was denied by FERC in March 2020. The order was appealed by Public Citizen, Inc. to the D.C. Circuit Court in May 2020, and Vistra, Dynegy and Illinois Power Marketing Company intervened in the case in June 2020. The appeal remains pending.

Other Matters


We are involved in various legal and administrative proceedings in the normal course of business, the ultimate resolutions of which, in the opinion of management, are not anticipated to have a material effect on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.


Labor Contracts


We employ certain personnel who are represented by labor unions, the terms of whose employment are governed by collective bargaining agreements. The terms of all current collective bargaining agreements covering represented personnel engaged in lignite mining operations, lignite-, coal- and nuclear-fueled generation operations and some of our natural gas-fueled generation operations expire on various dates between March 2019May 2021 and March 2022,November 2023, but remain effective from year-to-year thereafter unless and until terminated by either party. We are also presently negotiating the terms of first contracts at two of our natural gas-fueled generation facilities. While we cannot predict the outcome of labor contract negotiations, we do not expect any negotiated terms in our new collective bargaining agreements or changes in collective bargainingour existing agreements to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.


Nuclear Insurance


Nuclear insurance includes nuclear liability coverage, property damage, nuclear accident decontamination and accidental premature decommissioning coverage and accidental outage and/or extra expense coverage. We maintain nuclear insurance that meets or exceeds requirements promulgated by Section 170 (Price-Anderson) of the Atomic Energy Act (the Act) and Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations. We intend to maintain insurance against nuclear risks as long as such insurance is available. We are self-insured to the extent that losses (i) are within the policy deductibles, (ii) are not covered per policy exclusions, terms and limitations, (iii) exceed the amount of insurance maintained, or (iv) are not covered due to lack of insurance availability. Any such self-insured losses could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.



With regard to nuclear liability coverage, the Act provides for financial protection for the public in the event of a significant nuclear generation plant incident. The Act sets the statutory limit of public liability for a single nuclear incident at $14.1$13.8 billion and requires nuclear generation plant operators to provide financial protection for this amount. However, the United StatesU.S. Congress could impose revenue-raising measures on the nuclear industry to pay claims that exceed the $14.1$13.8 billion limit for a single incident. As required, we insure against a possible nuclear incident at our Comanche Peak facility resulting in public nuclear-related bodily injury and property damage through a combination of private insurance and an industry-wide retrospective payment plan known as Secondary Financial Protection (SFP).


Under the SFP, in the event of any single nuclear liability loss in excess of $450 million at any nuclear generation facility in the United States,U.S., each operating licensed reactor in the United StatesU.S. is subject to an annual assessment of up to $137.6 million. This approximately $137.6 million maximum assessment is subject to increases for inflation every five years, with the next expected adjustment scheduled to occur in Septemberby November 2023. Assessments are currently limited to $20.5 million per operating licensed reactor per year per incident. As of December 31, 2018,2020, our maximum potential assessment under the industry retrospective plan would be approximately $275 million per incident but no more than $41 million in any one year for each incident. The potential assessment is triggered by a nuclear liability loss in excess of $450 million per accident at any nuclear facility.


142
Table of Contents
The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requires that nuclear generation plant license holders maintain at least $1.06 billion of nuclear accident decontamination and propertyreactor damage stabilization insurance, and requires that the proceeds thereof be used to place a plant in a safe and stable condition, to decontaminate a plant pursuant to a plan submitted to, and approved by, the NRC prior to using the proceeds for plant repair or restoration, or to provide for premature decommissioning. We maintain nuclear accident decontamination and propertyreactor damage stabilization insurance for our Comanche Peak facility in the amount of $2.25 billion and non-nuclear accident related property damage in the amount of $1.5$1.0 billion (subject to a $5 million deductible per accident except for natural hazards which are subject to a $9.5 million deductible per accident), above which we are self-insured.


We also maintain Accidental Outage insurance to cover the additional costs of obtaining replacement electricity from another source if one or both of the units at our Comanche Peak facility are out of service for more than twelve weeks as a result of covered direct physical damage. Such coverage provides for weekly payments per unit up to $4.5 million for the first 52 weeks and up to $3.6 million for the remaining 71 weeks. The total maximum coverage is $328 million for non-nuclear property damage and $490 million for nuclear property damage. The coverage amounts applicable to each unit will be reduced to 80% if both units are out of service at the same time as a result of the same accident.



16.EQUITY

14.EQUITY
Successor Shareholders' Equity

Equity Issuances and Repurchases —

Changes in the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding for the years ended December 31, 20182020, 2019 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 20162018 are reflected in the table below.
 Successor
 Year Ended
December 31, 2018		 Year Ended
December 31, 2017		 Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
Shares outstanding at beginning of period428,398,802
 427,580,232
 —
Shares issued (a)97,639,105
 818,570
 427,580,232
Shares retired(6,815) —
 —
Shares repurchased (b)(32,815,783) —
 —
Shares outstanding at end of period493,215,309
 428,398,802
 427,580,232
Shares
Issued		Treasury
Shares		Shares Outstanding
Balance at December 31, 2017428,398,802 0 428,398,802 
Shares issued (a) (b)97,639,105 0 97,639,105 
Shares retired(6,815)0 (6,815)
Shares repurchased0 (32,815,783)(32,815,783)
Balance at December 31, 2018526,031,092 (32,815,783)493,215,309 
Shares issued (a) (c)2,716,349 18,773,958 21,490,307 
Shares retired(6,106)0 (6,106)
Shares repurchased0 (27,001,399)(27,001,399)
Balance at December 31, 2019528,741,335 (41,043,224)487,698,111 
Shares issued (a)1,611,462 0 1,611,462 
Shares retired(3,685)0 (3,685)
Balance at December 31, 2020530,349,112 (41,043,224)489,305,888 
____________
(a)Includes share awards granted to nonemployee directors. The year ended December 31, 2018 includes 94,409,573 shares issued in connection with the Merger (see Note 2).
(b)Treasury shares totaled 32,815,783 shares at December 31, 2018, all of which were acquired during the year ended December 31, 2018 in connection with the share repurchase program described below.

(a)Shares issued includes share awards granted to nonemployee directors.

(b)The year ended December 31, 2018 includes 94,409,573 shares issued in connection with the Merger (see Note 2).
(c)The year ended December 31, 2019 includes 18,773,958 treasury shares issued in connection with the settlement of all outstanding TEUs as discussed below.

Share Repurchase Program — Programs

In June 2018,September 2020, we announced that the Board had authorized a new share repurchase program (Share Repurchase Program) under which up to $500 million of our outstanding common stock could be repurchased. Repurchases under this program were completed on October 19, 2018. On a cumulative basis, 21,421,925 shares of our common stock were repurchased for $500 million (including related fees and expenses) at an average price per share of common stock of $23.36.

In November 2018, we announced that the Board had authorized an incremental share repurchase program (Program) under which up to $1.250$1.5 billion of our outstanding shares of common stock may be purchased. Through December 31, 2018, 12,073,091repurchased. The Share Repurchase Program was effective January 1, 2021, at which time the Prior Share Repurchase Plan (described below) and all authorized amounts remaining thereunder terminated as of such date.

143
Table of Contents
Under the Share Repurchase Program, shares of our common stock had been repurchased for $278 million (including related fees and expenses) at an average price per share of common stock of $22.99. At December 31, 2018, $972 million was available for additional repurchases under the Program, and we intend to implement the Program opportunistically from time to time through the end of 2019.

Shares of the Company's common stock may be repurchased in open market transactions at prevailing market prices, in privately negotiated transactions, pursuant to plans complying with the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended, or by other means in accordance with federal securities laws.The actual timing, number and value of shares repurchased under the Share Repurchase Program or otherwise will be determined at our discretion and will depend on a number of factors, including our capital allocation priorities, the market price of our stock, general market and economic conditions, applicable legal requirements and compliance with the terms of our debt agreementsagreements.

In June 2018, we announced that the Board had authorized a share repurchase program under which up to $500 million of our outstanding common stock may be purchased, and this authorized amount was fully utilized in 2018. In November 2018, we announced that the Tax Matters Agreement.Board had authorized an incremental share repurchase program under which up to $1.250 billion of our outstanding stock may be purchased, resulting in an aggregate $1.750 billion share repurchase program (collectively, Prior Share Repurchase Program).The Prior Share Repurchase Program was terminated on January 1, 2021.Shares of common stock repurchased under the Prior Share Repurchase Program for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 are reflected in the table below.

$500 Million Board Authorization$1.250 Billion Board Authorization
Total Number of Shares RepurchasedAverage Price Paid ShareAmount Paid for Shares RepurchasedTotal Number of Shares RepurchasedAverage Price Paid ShareAmount Paid for Shares Repurchased
Year Ended December 31, 201821,421,925$23.36 $500 12,073,091$22.99 $278 
Year Ended December 31, 20190$0 $0 26,322,166$24.34 $640 
Year Ended December 31, 202000 0 00 0 
Totals21,421,925$23.36 $500 38,395,257$23.91 $918 

Dividends —

In November 2018, Vistra Energyannounced the Board adopted a dividend program which we initiated in the first quarter of 2019. Each dividend under the program will be subject to declaration by the Board and, thus, may be subject to numerous factors in existence at the time of any such declaration including, but not limited to, prevailing market conditions, Vistra's results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, Delaware law and any contractual limitations.

In February 2019, May 2019, July 2019 and October 2019, the Board declared quarterly dividends of $0.125 per share that were paid in March 2019, June 2019, September 2019 and December 2019, respectively.

In February 2020, April 2020, July 2020 and October 2020, the Board declared quarterly dividends of $0.135 per share that were paid in March 2020, June 2020, September 2020 and December 2020, respectively.

In February 2021, the Board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share that will be paid in March 2021.

Vistra did not declare or pay any dividends during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. In December 2016, the Board approved the payment of a special cash dividend (Special Dividend) in the aggregate amount of approximately $1 billion ($2.32 per share of common stock) to holders of record of our common stock on December 19, 2016. The dividend was funded using borrowings under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities.2018.


Dividend Restrictions —

The agreement governing the Credit Facilities Agreement generally restricts the ability of Vistra Operations to make distributions to any direct or indirect parent unless such distributions are expressly permitted thereunder. As of December 31, 2018,2020, Vistra Operations can distribute approximately $9.3$6.7 billion to Vistra Energy Corp. (the Parent)Parent under the Credit Facilities Agreement without the consent of any party. The amount that can be distributed by Vistra Operations to the Parent was partially reduced by distributions made by Vistra Operations to Parent of approximately $1.1 billion, $3.9 billion and $4.7 billion during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, and 2017 of approximately $4.7 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively. In February 2019, Vistra Operations made an additional distribution to the Parent of approximately $1.45 billion. Additionally, Vistra Operations may make distributions to the Parent in amounts sufficient for the Parent to make any payments required under the TRA or the Tax Matters Agreement or, to the extent arising out of the Parent's ownership or operation of Vistra Operations, to pay any taxes or general operating or corporate overhead expenses. As of December 31, 2018,2020, the maximum amount of restricted net assets of Vistra Operations that may not be distributed to Parent totaled approximately $6.5$1.2 billion.


UnderIn addition to the restrictions under the Credit Facilities Agreement, under applicable Delaware General Corporate Law,law, we are prohibited from paying any distributiononly permitted to the extent that such distribution exceeds the valuemake distributions either out of our "surplus," which is defined as the excess of our net assets above our capital (the aggregate par value of all outstanding shares of our stock)., or out of net profits for the fiscal year in which the distribution is declared or the prior fiscal year.


144
Table of Contents
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income—

During the years ended December 31, 20182020, 2019 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016,2018, we recorded changes in the funded status of our pension and other postretirement employee benefit liability totaling $9$23 million, $(23)$11 million and $6$9 million, respectively. During the yearyears ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, $(5) million, $(3) million and $(3) million respectively was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income and reported in other deductions. During the year ended December 31, 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016, no amounts were reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income.


Warrants—

At the Merger Date, the Company entered into an agreement whereby holdersthe holder of each outstanding warrant previously issued by Dynegy willwould be entitled to receive, upon paying an exercise, price of $35.00 (subject to adjustment from time to time), the equity securities to which thenumber of shares of Vistra common stock that such holder would have been entitled to receive if it had held one share of Dynegy common stock converted intoat the closing of the Merger, or 0.652 shares of Vistra Energycommon stock. Accordingly, upon exercise, a warrant holder would effectively pay $53.68 (subject to adjustment of the exercise price from time to time) per share of Vistra common stock at the Exchange Ratio.received. As of December 31, 2018, nine million2020, 9000000 warrants expiring in 2024 with an exercise price of $35.00 were outstanding, each of which can be redeemed for 0.652 share of Vistra Energy common stock.outstanding. The warrants are recorded aswere included in equity in our consolidated balance sheet.based on their fair value at the Merger Date.



Tangible Equity Units —(TEUs)

At the Merger Date, the Company assumed the obligations of Dynegy's 4,600,000 7.00% tangible equity units,TEUs, each with a stated amount of $100.00 and each comprised of (i) a prepaid stock purchase contract that will deliverdelivered to the holder not later thanon July 1, 2019, unless earlier redeemed or settled, not more than 4.04214.0813 shares of Vistra Energy common stock and not less than 3.2731 shares of Vistra Energy common stock per contract based upon the applicable fixed settlementwith cash paid in lieu of any fractional shares at a rate in the contractof $22.5954 per share and (ii) a senior amortizing note with an outstanding principal amount of $38 million at the Merger Date that payspaid an equal quarterly cash installment of $1.75 per amortizing note (see Note 14)11). In the aggregate, the annual quarterly cash installments will bewere equivalent to a 7.00% cash payment per year with respect to each $100.00 stated amount of tangible equity units.TEUs. The amortizing notes arewere accounted for as debt while the stock purchase contract iswas included in equity based on the fair value of the contract at the Merger Date (See Statements(see note 11). The entire class of Consolidated EquityTEUs were suspended from trading on the New York Stock Exchange on July 1, 2019 and Note 14).removed from listing and registration on July 12, 2019. On July 1, 2019, approximately 18.8 million treasury shares of Vistra common stock were issued in connection with the settlement of all outstanding TEUs.


Predecessor Membership Interests

15.FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
TCEH paid no dividends in the period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016.


17.FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS


We utilize several different valuation techniques to measure the fair value of assets and liabilities, relying primarily on the market approach of using prices and other market information for identical and/or comparable assets and liabilities for those items that are measured on a recurring basis. We use a mid-market valuation convention (the mid-point price between bid and ask prices) as a practical expedient to measure fair value for the majority of our assets and liabilities and use valuation techniques to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Our valuation policies and procedures were developed, maintained and validated by a centralized risk management group that reports to the Vistra Energy Chief Financial Officer.


Fair value measurements of derivative assets and liabilities incorporate an adjustment for credit-related nonperformance risk. These nonperformance risk adjustments take into consideration master netting arrangements, credit enhancements and the credit risks associated with our credit standing and the credit standing of our counterparties (see Note 1816 for additional information regarding credit risk associated with our derivatives). We utilize credit ratings and default rate factors in calculating these fair value measurement adjustments.


We categorize our assets and liabilities recorded at fair value based upon the following fair value hierarchy:


•Level 1 valuations use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date. Our Level 1 assets and liabilities include CME or ICE (electronic commodity derivative exchanges) futures and options transacted through clearing brokers for which prices are actively quoted. We report the fair value of CME and ICE transactions without taking into consideration margin deposits, with the exception of certain margin amounts related to changes in fair value on certain CME transactions that beginning in January 2017, are legally characterized as settlement of derivative contracts rather than collateral.


145
Table of Contents
•Level 2 valuations utilize over-the-counter broker quotes, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities that are corroborated by correlations or other mathematical means, and other valuation inputs such as interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals. We attempt to obtain multiple quotes from brokers that are active in the markets in which we participate and require at least one quote from two brokers to determine a pricing input as observable. The number of broker quotes received for certain pricing inputs varies depending on the depth of the trading market, each individual broker's publication policy, recent trading volume trends and various other factors.


•Level 3 valuations use unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are used to the extent observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. We use the most meaningful information available from the market combined with internally developed valuation methodologies to develop our best estimate of fair value. Significant unobservable inputs used to develop the valuation models include volatility curves, correlation curves, illiquid pricing delivery periods and locations and credit-related nonperformance risk assumptions. These inputs and valuation models are developed and maintained by employees trained and experienced in market operations and fair value measurements and validated by the Company's risk management group.


With respect to amounts presented in the following fair value hierarchy tables, the fair value measurement of an asset or liability (e.g., a contract) is required to fall in its entirety in one level, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.



Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis consisted of the following at the respective balance sheet dates shown below:
December 31, 2018
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 (a) Reclassification (b) Total
Assets:         
Commodity contracts$456
 $152
 $153
 $1
 $762
Interest rate swaps—
 77
 —
 —
 77
Nuclear decommissioning trust –
equity securities (c)		449
 —
 —
 —
 449
Nuclear decommissioning trust –
debt securities (c)		—
 443
 —
 —
 443
Sub-total$905
 $672
 $153
 $1
 1,731
Assets measured at net asset value (d):         
Nuclear decommissioning trust –
equity securities (c)		        278
Total assets        $2,009
Liabilities:         
Commodity contracts$557
 $766
 $288
 $1
 $1,612
Interest rate swaps—
 34
 —
 —
 34
Total liabilities$557
 $800
 $288
 $1
 $1,646

December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
December 31, 2017
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 (a) Reclassification (b) TotalLevel
1		Level
2		Level
3 (a)		Reclass (b)TotalLevel
1		Level
2		Level
3 (a)		Reclass (b)Total
Assets:         Assets:
Commodity contracts$47
 $98
 $75
 $2
 $222
Commodity contracts$452 $201 $205 $76 $934 $1,047 $172 $239 $11 $1,469 
Interest rate swaps—
 18
 —
 8
 26
Interest rate swaps— 72 — — 72 — — — — — 
Nuclear decommissioning trust –
equity securities (c)		468
 —
 —
 —
 468
Nuclear decommissioning trust – equity securities (c)623 — — — 623 564 — — — 564 
Nuclear decommissioning trust –
debt securities (c)		—
 430
 —
 —
 430
Nuclear decommissioning trust – debt securities (c)— 618 — — 618 — 521 — — 521 
Sub-total$515
 $546
 $75
 $10
 1,146
Sub-total$1,075 $891 $205 $76 2,247 $1,611 $693 $239 $11 2,554 
Assets measured at net asset value (d):         Assets measured at net asset value (d):
Nuclear decommissioning trust –
equity securities (c)		        290
Nuclear decommissioning trust – equity securities (c)433 366 
Total assets        $1,436
Total assets$2,680 $2,920 
Liabilities:         Liabilities:
Commodity contracts$45
 $143
 $128
 $2
 $318
Commodity contracts$578 $172 $183 $76 $1,009 $985 $439 $313 $11 $1,748 
Interest rate swaps—
 —
 —
 8
 8
Interest rate swaps— 404 — — 404 — 177 — — 177 
Total liabilities$45
 $143
 $128
 $10
 $326
Total liabilities$578 $576 $183 $76 $1,413 $985 $616 $313 $11 $1,925 
____________
(a)See table below for description of Level 3 assets and liabilities.
(b)Fair values are determined on a contract basis, but certain contracts result in a current asset and a noncurrent liability, or vice versa, as presented in our consolidated balance sheets.
(c)The nuclear decommissioning trust investment is included in the other investments line in our consolidated balance sheets. See Note 23.
(d)The fair value amounts presented in this line are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in our consolidated balance sheets. Certain investments measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy.

(a)See table below for description of Level 3 assets and liabilities.

(b)Fair values are determined on a contract basis, but certain contracts result in a current asset and a noncurrent liability, or vice versa, as presented in our consolidated balance sheets.
(c)The nuclear decommissioning trust investment is included in the other investments line in our consolidated balance sheets. See Note 21.
(d)The fair value amounts presented in this line are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in our consolidated balance sheets. Certain investments measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy.

Commodity contracts consist primarily of natural gas, electricity, fuel oil, uranium, coal and emissions agreements and include financial instruments entered into for economic hedging purposes as well as physical contracts that have not been designated as normal purchases or sales. Interest rate swaps are used to reduce exposure to interest rate changes by converting floating-rate interest to fixed rates. See Note 1816 for further discussion regarding derivative instruments.


146
Table of Contents
Nuclear decommissioning trust assets represent securities held for the purpose of funding the future retirement and decommissioning of our nuclear generation facility. These investments include equity, debt and other fixed-income securities consistent with investment rules established by the NRC and the PUCT.


The following tables present the fair value of the Level 3 assets and liabilities by major contract type and the significant unobservable inputs used in the valuations at December 31, 20182020 and 2017:2019:
December 31, 2020
Fair Value
Contract Type (a)AssetsLiabilitiesTotalValuation TechniqueSignificant Unobservable InputRange (b)Average (b)
Electricity purchases and sales$61 $(90)$(29)Income ApproachHourly price curve shape (c)$0 to$85 $43 
MWh
Illiquid delivery periods for hub power prices and heat rates (d)$25 to$125 $75 
MWh
Options38 (56)(18)Option Pricing ModelGas to power correlation (e)30 %to100 %64 %
Power and gas volatility (e)5 %to665 %336 %
Financial transmission rights92 (16)76 Market Approach (f)Illiquid price differences between settlement points (g)$(5)to$50 $22 
MWh
Other (h)14 (21)(7)
Total$205 $(183)$22 
December 31, 2018
  Fair Value      
Contract Type (a) Assets Liabilities Total Valuation Technique Significant Unobservable Input Range (b)
Electricity purchases and sales $22
 $(48) $(26) Valuation Model Hourly price curve shape (c) $0 to $110/ MWh
          Illiquid delivery periods for ERCOT hub power prices and heat rates (d) $20 to $120/ MWh
Electricity and weather options 31
 (192) (161) Option Pricing Model Gas to power correlation (e) 15% to 95%
          Power volatility (e) 5% to 435%
Financial transmission rights 85
 (20) 65
 Market Approach (f) Illiquid price differences between settlement points (g) $(10) to $50/ MWh
Other (h) 15
 (28) (13)      
Total $153
 $(288) $(135)      


December 31, 2017
December 31, 2019December 31, 2019
 Fair Value Fair Value
Contract Type (a) Assets Liabilities Total Valuation Technique Significant Unobservable Input Range (b)Contract Type (a)AssetsLiabilitiesTotalValuation TechniqueSignificant Unobservable InputRange (b)Average (b)
Electricity purchases and sales $12
 $(33) $(21) Valuation Model Hourly price curve shape (c) $0 to $40/ MWhElectricity purchases and sales$64 $(53)$11 Income ApproachHourly price curve shape (c)$0 to$115 $58 
Electricity purchases and salesMWh
       Illiquid delivery periods for ERCOT hub power prices and heat rates (d) td0 to $70/ MWhIlliquid delivery periods for ERCOT hub power prices and heat rates (d)$20 to$120 $70 
Electricity and weather options —
 (91) (91) Option Pricing Model Gas to power correlation (e) 30% to 100%
       Power volatility (e) 5% to 180%Illiquid delivery periods for ERCOT hub power prices and heat rates (d)MWh
OptionsOptions38 (188)(150)Option Pricing Model10 %to100 %55 %
Power and gas volatility (e)5 %to440 %223 %
Financial transmission rights 45
 (4) 41
 Market Approach (f) Illiquid price differences between settlement points (g) $0 to td5/ MWhFinancial transmission rights120 (26)94 Market Approach (f)Illiquid price differences between settlement points (g)$(10)to$40 $15 
Financial transmission rightsMWh
Other (h) 18
 —
 18
 Other (h)17 (46)(29)
Total $75
 $(128) $(53) Total$239 $(313)$(74)
____________
(a)Electricity purchase and sales contracts include power and heat rate positions in ERCOT, PJM, NYISO, ISO-NE and MISO regions. The forward purchase contracts (swaps and options) used to hedge electricity price differences between settlement points within are referred to as congestion revenue rights in ERCOT and financial transmission rights in PJM, NYISO, ISO-NE and MISO regions. Electricity options consist of physical electricity options and spread options.
(b)The range of the inputs may be influenced by factors such as time of day, delivery period, season and location.
(c)Primarily based on the historical range of forward average hourly ERCOT North Hub prices.
(d)Primarily based on historical forward ERCOT power price and heat rate variability.
(e)Based on historical forward correlation and volatility within ERCOT.

(a)Electricity purchase and sales contracts include power and heat rate positions in ERCOT, PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO and MISO regions. The forward purchase contracts (swaps and options) used to hedge electricity price differences between settlement points are referred to as congestion revenue rights (CRRs) in ERCOT and financial transmission rights (FTRs) in PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO and MISO regions. Options consist of physical electricity options, spread options, swaptions and natural gas options.
(f)While we use the market approach, there is insufficient market data to consider the valuation liquid.
(g)Primarily based on the historical price differences between settlement points within ERCOT hubs and load zones.
(h)Other includes contracts for natural gas, coal options and emissions.

(b)The range of the inputs may be influenced by factors such as time of day, delivery period, season and location. The average represents the arithmetic average of the underlying inputs and is not weighted by the related fair value or notional amount.
(c)Primarily based on the historical range of forward average hourly ERCOT North Hub prices.
(d)Primarily based on historical forward ERCOT and PJM power prices and ERCOT heat rate variability.
(e)Primarily based on the historical forward correlation and volatility within ERCOT.
(f)While we use the market approach, there is insufficient market data to consider the valuation liquid.
(g)Primarily based on the historical price differences between settlement points within ERCOT hubs and load zones.
(h)Other includes contracts for natural gas, coal and environmental allowances.
147
Table of Contents

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy for the Successor period for the years ended December 31, 20182020, 2019 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016.2018. See the table below for discussion of transfers between Level 2 and Level 3 for the Successor period for the years ended December 31, 20182020, 2019 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016.2018.


The following table presents the changes in fair value of the Level 3 assets and liabilities for the Successor period foryears ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Net liability balance at beginning of period$(74)$(135)$(53)
Total unrealized valuation gains (losses)(5)8 (363)
Purchases, issuances and settlements (a):
Purchases164 176 146 
Issuances(28)(81)(41)
Settlements(90)(64)76 
Transfers into Level 3 (b)(2)10 4 
Transfers out of Level 3 (b)57 12 133 
Net liabilities assumed in connection with the Merger0 0 (37)
Net change (c)96 61 (82)
Net asset (liability) balance at end of period$22 $(74)$(135)
Unrealized valuation gains (losses) relating to instruments held at end of period$18 $(61)$(174)
____________
(a)Settlements reflect reversals of unrealized mark-to-market valuations previously recognized in net income. Purchases and issuances reflect option premiums paid or received, including CRRs and FTRs.
(b)Includes transfers due to changes in the observability of significant inputs. All Level 3 transfers during the periods presented are in and out of Level 2. For the year ended December 31, 2020, transfers out of Level 3 primarily consist of gas, power and coal derivatives where forward pricing inputs have become observable. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, transfers out of Level 3 primarily consist of power and 2017 andcoal derivatives where forward pricing inputs have become observable.
(c)Activity excludes change in fair value in the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 andmonth positions settle. Substantially all changes in values of commodity contracts (excluding the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016.net liabilities assumed in connection with the Merger) are reported as operating revenues in our consolidated statements of operations.

16.COMMODITY AND OTHER DERIVATIVE CONTRACTUAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016		  Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016
 2018 2017   
Net asset (liability) balance at beginning of period (a)$(53) $83
 $81
  $37
Total unrealized valuation gains (losses)(363) (136) 31
  122
Purchases, issuances and settlements (b):        
Purchases146
 69
 15
  37
Issuances(41) (22) (7)  (20)
Settlements76
 (106) (30)  (51)
Transfers into Level 3 (c)4
 4
 3
  1
Transfers out of Level 3 (c)133
 71
 (10)  1
Net liabilities assumed in connections with the Merger(37) —
 —
  —
Earn-out provision (d)—
 (16) —
  —
Net liabilities assumed in the Lamar and Forney Acquisition (Note 3) (e)—
 —
 —
  (30)
Net change (f)(82) (136) 2
  60
Net asset (liability) balance at end of period$(135) $(53) $83
  $97
Unrealized valuation gains (losses) relating to instruments held at end of period$(174) $(98) $28
  $98
____________
(a)The beginning balance for the Successor period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 reflects a $16 million adjustment to the fair value of certain Level 3 assets driven by power prices utilized by the Successor for unobservable delivery periods.
(b)Settlements reflect reversals of unrealized mark-to-market valuations previously recognized in net income. Purchases and issuances reflect option premiums paid or received.
(c)Includes transfers due to changes in the observability of significant inputs. All Level 3 transfers during the periods presented are in and out of Level 2. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, transfers out of Level 3 primarily consists of electricity derivatives where forward pricing inputs have become observable.
(d)Represents initial fair value of the earn-out provision agreed to as part of the Odessa Acquisition. See Note 3.
(e)Includes fair value of Level 3 assets and liabilities as of the purchase date and any related rolloff between the purchase date and the period ended October 2, 2016.
(f)Activity excludes change in fair value in the month positions settle. For the Successor period, substantially all changes in values of commodity contracts (excluding the net liabilities assumed in connection with the Merger and the initial fair value of the earn-out provision related to the Odessa Acquisition in 2017) are reported as operating revenues in our statements of consolidated income (loss). For the Predecessor period, substantially all changes in values of commodity contracts (excluding net liabilities assumed in the Lamar and Forney Acquisition in 2016) are reported as net gain from commodity hedging and trading activities in the statements of consolidated income (loss).


18.COMMODITY AND OTHER DERIVATIVE CONTRACTUAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES


Strategic Use of Derivatives


We transact in derivative instruments, such as options, swaps, futures and forward contracts, to manage commodity price and interest rate risk. See Note 1715 for a discussion of the fair value of derivatives.


Commodity Hedging and Trading Activity — We utilize natural gas and electricity derivatives to reduce exposure to changes in electricity prices primarily to hedge future revenues from electricity sales from our generation assets.assets and to hedge future purchased power costs for our retail operations. We also utilize short-term electricity, natural gas, coal fuel oil, uranium and emissions derivative instruments for fuel hedging and other purposes. Counterparties to these transactions include energy companies, financial institutions, electric utilities, independent power producers, fuel oil and gas producers, local distribution companies and energy marketing companies. Unrealized gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of derivative instruments as well as realized gains and losses upon settlement of the instruments are reported in our consolidated statements of consolidated income (loss)operations in operating revenues and fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees in the Successor period and net gain from commodity hedging and trading activities in the Predecessor period.fees.


148
Table of Contents
Interest Rate Swaps — Interest rate swap agreements are used to reduce exposure to interest rate changes by converting floating-rate interest rates to fixed rates, thereby hedging future interest costs and related cash flows. Unrealized gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of the swaps as well as realized gains and losses upon settlement of the swaps are reported in our consolidated statements of consolidated income (loss)operations in interest expense and related charges. During 2019, Vistra entered into $2.12 billion of new interest rate swaps, pursuant to which Vistra will pay a variable rate and receive a fixed rate. The terms of these new swaps were matched against the terms of certain existing swaps, effectively offsetting the hedge of the existing swaps and fixing the out-of-the-money position of such swaps. These matched swaps will settle over time, in accordance with the original contractual terms. The remaining existing swaps continue to hedge our exposure on $2.30 billion of debt through July 2026.


Financial Statement Effects of Derivatives


Substantially all derivative contractual assets and liabilities are accounted for under mark-to-market accounting consistent with accounting standards related to derivative instruments and hedging activities. The following tables provide detail of derivative contractual assets and liabilities as reported in our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 20182020 and 2017.2019. Derivative asset and liability totals represent the net value of the contract, while the balance sheet totals represent the gross value of the contract.
December 31, 2020
Derivative AssetsDerivative Liabilities
Commodity ContractsInterest Rate SwapsCommodity ContractsInterest Rate SwapsTotal
Current assets$665 $19 $64 $0 $748 
Noncurrent assets197 53 8 0 258 
Current liabilities(1)0 (717)(71)(789)
Noncurrent liabilities(3)0 (288)(333)(624)
Net assets (liabilities)$858 $72 $(933)$(404)$(407)
 December 31, 2018
 Derivative Assets Derivative Liabilities  
 Commodity Contracts Interest Rate Swaps Commodity Contracts Interest Rate Swaps Total
Current assets$707
 $22
 $1
 $—
 $730
Noncurrent assets54
 55
 —
 —
 109
Current liabilities—
 —
 (1,374) (2) (1,376)
Noncurrent liabilities—
 —
 (238) (32) (270)
Net assets (liabilities)$761
 $77
 $(1,611) $(34) $(807)


December 31, 2019
Derivative AssetsDerivative Liabilities
Commodity ContractsInterest Rate SwapsCommodity ContractsInterest Rate SwapsTotal
Current assets$1,323 $0 $10 $0 $1,333 
Noncurrent assets136 0 0 0 136 
Current liabilities(1)0 (1,510)(18)(1,529)
Noncurrent liabilities0 0 (237)(159)(396)
Net assets (liabilities)$1,458 $0 $(1,737)$(177)$(456)
 December 31, 2017
 Derivative Assets Derivative Liabilities  
 Commodity Contracts Interest Rate Swaps Commodity Contracts Interest Rate Swaps Total
Current assets$190
 $—
 $—
 $—
 $190
Noncurrent assets30
 22
 2
 4
 58
Current liabilities—
 (4) (216) (4) (224)
Noncurrent liabilities—
 —
 (102) —
 (102)
Net assets (liabilities)$220
 $18
 $(316) $—
 $(78)


At December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, there were no derivative positions accounted for as cash flow or fair value hedges.



The following table presents the pretax effect of derivative gains (losses) on net income, including realized and unrealized effects. Amount represents changes in fair value of positions in the derivative portfolio during the period, as realized amounts related to positions settled are assumed to equal reversals of previously recorded unrealized amounts.

Year Ended December 31,
Derivative (consolidated statements of operations presentation)202020192018
Commodity contracts (Operating revenues)$241 $339 $(855)
Commodity contracts (Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees)4 (1)18 
Interest rate swaps (Interest expense and related charges)(196)(217)(11)
Net gain (loss)$49 $121 $(848)

149
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016		  Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016
Derivative (statements of consolidated income (loss) presentation)2018 2017   
Commodity contracts (Operating revenues)$(855) $56
 $(92)  $—
Commodity contracts (Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees)18
 6
 21
  —
Commodity contracts (Net gain from commodity hedging and trading activities)—
 —
 —
  194
Interest rate swaps (Interest expense and related charges)(11) 2
 (11)  —
Net gain (loss)$(848) $64
 $(82)  $194

In conjunction with fresh start reporting, the balances in accumulated other comprehensive income were eliminated from our consolidated balance sheet on the Effective Date. The pretax effect (all losses) on net income and other comprehensive income (OCI)Table of derivative instruments previously accounted for as cash flow hedges by the Predecessor was immaterial for the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016. There were no amounts recognized in OCI for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016.Contents

Balance Sheet Presentation of Derivatives


We elect to report derivative assets and liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets on a gross basis without taking into consideration netting arrangements we have with counterparties to those derivatives. We maintain standardized master netting agreements with certain counterparties that allow for the right to offset assets and liabilities and collateral in order to reduce credit exposure between us and the counterparty. These agreements contain specific language related to margin requirements, monthly settlement netting, cross-commodity netting and early termination netting, which is negotiated with the contract counterparty.


Generally, margin deposits that contractually offset these derivative instruments are reported separately in our consolidated balance sheets, with the exception of certain margin amounts related to changes in fair value on CME transactions that beginning in January 2017, are legally characterized as settlement of forward exposure rather than collateral. Margin deposits received from counterparties are primarily used for working capital or other general corporate purposes.



The following tables reconcile our derivative assets and liabilities on a contract basis to net amounts after taking into consideration netting arrangements with counterparties and financial collateral:
 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
 
Derivative Assets
and Liabilities
 Offsetting Instruments (a) Cash Collateral (Received) Pledged (b) Net Amounts 
Derivative Assets
and Liabilities
 Offsetting Instruments (a) Cash Collateral (Received) Pledged (b) Net AmountsDerivative Assets
and Liabilities		Offsetting Instruments (a)Cash Collateral (Received) Pledged (b)Net AmountsDerivative Assets
and Liabilities		Offsetting Instruments (a)Cash Collateral (Received) Pledged (b)Net Amounts
Derivative assets:                Derivative assets:
Commodity contracts $761
 $(593) $(1) $167
 $220
 $(113) $(1) $106
Commodity contracts$858 $(667)$(11)$180 $1,458 $(1,113)$0 $345 
Interest rate swaps 77
 (26) —
 51
 18
 —
 —
 18
Interest rate swaps72 (72)0 0 0 0 0 0 
Total derivative assets 838
 (619) (1) 218
 238
 (113) (1) 124
Total derivative assets930 (739)(11)180 1,458 (1,113)0 345 
Derivative liabilities:                Derivative liabilities:
Commodity contracts (1,611) 593
 109
 (909) (316) 113
 1
 (202)Commodity contracts(933)667 138 (128)(1,737)1,113 40 (584)
Interest rate swaps (34) 26
 —
 (8) —
 —
 —
 —
Interest rate swaps(404)72 0 (332)(177)0 0 (177)
Total derivative liabilities (1,645) 619
 109
 (917) (316) 113
 1
 (202)Total derivative liabilities(1,337)739 138 (460)(1,914)1,113 40 (761)
Net amounts $(807) $—
 $108
 $(699) $(78) $—
 $—
 $(78)Net amounts$(407)$— $127 $(280)$(456)$— $40 $(416)
____________
(a)Amounts presented exclude trade accounts receivable and payable related to settled financial instruments.
(b)Represents cash amounts received or pledged pursuant to a master netting arrangement, including fair value-based margin requirements.

(a)Amounts presented exclude trade accounts receivable and payable related to settled financial instruments.
(b)Represents cash amounts received or pledged pursuant to a master netting arrangement, including fair value-based margin requirements, and, to a lesser extent, initial margin requirements.

150
Table of Contents
Derivative Volumes


The following table presents the gross notional amounts of derivative volumes at December 31, 20182020 and 2017:2019:
 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Derivative type Notional Volume Unit of MeasureDerivative typeNotional VolumeUnit of Measure
Natural gas (a) 7,011
 1,259
 Million MMBtuNatural gas (a)5,264 6,160 Million MMBtu
Electricity 317,572
 114,129
 GWhElectricity438,863 428,367 GWh
Financial Transmission Rights (b) 172,611
 110,913
 GWh
Financial transmission rights (b)Financial transmission rights (b)217,350 199,648 GWh
Coal 45
 2
 Million U.S. tonsCoal20 22 Million U.S. tons
Fuel oil 60
 5
 Million gallonsFuel oil176 33 Million gallons
Uranium 50
 325
 Thousand pounds
Emissions 10
 —
 Million tonsEmissions8 20 Million tons
Interest rate swaps – floating/fixed (c) $7,717
 $3,000
 Million U.S. dollars
Renewable energy certificatesRenewable energy certificates18 11 Million certificates
Interest rate swaps – variable/fixed (c)Interest rate swaps – variable/fixed (c)$6,720 $6,720 Million U.S. dollars
Interest rate swaps - fixed/variable (c)Interest rate swaps - fixed/variable (c)$2,120 $2,120 Million U.S. dollars
____________
(a)Represents gross notional forward sales, purchases and options transactions, locational basis swaps and other natural gas transactions.
(b)Represents gross forward purchases associated with instruments used to hedge electricity price differences between settlement points within ISOs or RTOs.
(c)Includes notional amounts of interest rate swaps with maturity dates through July 2026.

(a)Represents gross notional forward sales, purchases and options transactions, locational basis swaps and other natural gas transactions.

(b)Represents gross forward purchases associated with instruments used to hedge electricity price differences between settlement points within regions.
(c)Includes notional amounts of interest rate swaps with maturity dates through July 2026.

Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features of Derivatives


Our derivative contracts may contain certain credit risk-related contingent features that could trigger liquidity requirements in the form of cash collateral, letters of credit or some other form of credit enhancement. Certain of these agreements require the posting of collateral if our credit rating is downgraded by one or more credit rating agencies or include cross-default contractual provisions that could result in the settlement of such contracts if there was a failure under other financing arrangements related to payment terms or other covenants.


The following table presents the commodity derivative liabilities subject to credit risk-related contingent features that are not fully collateralized:
December 31,December 31,
2018 201720202019
Fair value of derivative contract liabilities (a)$(856) $(204)Fair value of derivative contract liabilities (a)$(679)$(692)
Offsetting fair value under netting arrangements (b)218
 103
Offsetting fair value under netting arrangements (b)262 167 
Cash collateral and letters of credit190
 41
Cash collateral and letters of credit35 67 
Liquidity exposure$(448) $(60)Liquidity exposure$(382)$(458)
____________
(a)Excludes fair value of contracts that contain contingent features that do not provide specific amounts to be posted if features are triggered, including provisions that generally provide the right to request additional collateral (material adverse change, performance assurance and other clauses).
(b)Amounts include the offsetting fair value of in-the-money derivative contracts and net accounts receivable under master netting arrangements.

(a)Excludes fair value of contracts that contain contingent features that do not provide specific amounts to be posted if features are triggered, including provisions that generally provide the right to request additional collateral (material adverse change, performance assurance and other clauses).
(b)Amounts include the offsetting fair value of in-the-money derivative contracts and net accounts receivable under master netting arrangements.

Concentrations of Credit Risk Related to Derivatives


We have concentrations of credit risk with the counterparties to our derivative contracts. At December 31, 2018,2020, total credit risk exposure to all counterparties related to derivative contracts totaled $1.095$1.085 billion (including associated accounts receivable). The net exposure to those counterparties totaled $344$293 million at December 31, 20182020 after taking into effect netting arrangements, setoff provisions and collateral, with the largest net exposure to a single counterparty totaling $78$85 million. At December 31, 2018,2020, the credit risk exposure to the banking and financial sector represented 62%65% of the total credit risk exposure and 22%18% of the net exposure.


151
Table of Contents
Exposure to banking and financial sector counterparties is considered to be within an acceptable level of risk tolerance because all of this exposure is with counterparties with investment grade credit ratings. However, this concentration increases the risk that a default by any of these counterparties would have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. The transactions with these counterparties contain certain provisions that would require the counterparties to post collateral in the event of a material downgrade in their credit rating.


We maintain credit risk policies with regard to our counterparties to minimize overall credit risk. These policies authorize specific risk mitigation tools including, but not limited to, use of standardized master agreements that allow for netting of positive and negative exposures associated with a single counterparty. Credit enhancements such as parent guarantees, letters of credit, surety bonds, liens on assets and margin deposits are also utilized. Prospective material changes in the payment history or financial condition of a counterparty or downgrade of its credit quality result in the reassessment of the credit limit with that counterparty. The process can result in the subsequent reduction of the credit limit or a request for additional financial assurances. An event of default by one or more counterparties could subsequently result in termination-related settlement payments that reduce available liquidity if amounts are owed to the counterparties related to the derivative contracts or delays in receipts of expected settlements if the counterparties owe amounts to us.




19.    17.PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (OPEB) PLANS


On the Effective Date, the EFH Retirement Plan was transferred to Vistra Energy pursuant to a separation agreement between Vistra Energy and EFH Corp. As of the Effective Date, Vistra Energy is the plan sponsor of the Vistra Energy Retirement Plan (the Retirement Plan), which provides benefits to eligible employees of its subsidiaries. Oncor is a participant in the Retirement Plan. As Vistra Energy accounts for its interests in the Retirement Plan as a multiple employer plan, only Vistra Energy'sVistra's share of the plan assets and obligations are reported in the pension benefit information presented below. After amendments in 2012, employees in the Retirement Plan now consist entirely of participants who were active and retired collective bargaining unit employees. The Retirement Plan is a qualified defined benefit pension plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Code), and is subject to the provisions of ERISA. The Retirement Plan provides benefits to participants under one of two formulas: (i) a Cash Balance Formula under which participants earn monthly contribution credits based on their compensation and a combination of their age and years of service, plus monthly interest credits or (ii) a Traditional Retirement Plan Formula based on years of service and the average earnings of the three years of highest earnings. Under the Cash Balance Formula, future increases in earnings will not apply to prior service costs. It is our policy to fund the Retirement Plan assets only to the extent required under existing federal regulations.


Vistra Energy and our participating subsidiaries offer other postretirement employee benefits (OPEB) in the form of certain health care and life insurance benefits to eligible retirees and their eligible dependents. The retiree contributions required for such coverage vary based on a formula depending on the retiree's age and years of service.


Prior to the Merger, Dynegy provided pension and OPEB benefits to certain of its employees and retirees. At the Merger Date, Vistra Energy assumed these plans and the excess of the benefit obligations over the fair value of plan assets was recognized as a liability (see Note 2). Benefit obligations assumed totaled $539 million and the fair value of plan assets assumed totaled $459 million, and the net unfunded liability was recorded as $15 million to other noncurrent assets, $2 million to other current liabilities and $93 million to other noncurrent liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.


Effective January 1, 2018, Vistra Energy entered into a contractual arrangement with Oncor whereby the costs associated with providing OPEB coverage for certain retirees (Split Participants) whose employment included service with both the regulated businesses of Oncor (or its predecessors) and the non-regulated businesses of Vistra Energy (or its predecessors) are split between Oncor and Vistra Energy. Prior to January 1, 2018, coverage for Split Participants was provided by the Oncor OPEB plan, with Vistra Energy retaining its portion of the liability for coverage for Split Participants. In addition, Vistra Energy is the sponsor of an OPEB plan that certain EFH Corp. retirees participate in.Vistra. As Vistra Energy accounts for its interest in thesethis OPEB plansplan as a multiple employer plans,plan, only Vistra Energy'sVistra's share of the plan assets and obligations are reported in the OPEB information presented below. In addition, Vistra is the sponsor of OPEB plans that certain EFH Corp. and Dynegy retirees participate in.


Pension and OPEB Costs

Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Pension costs$11 $9 $14 
OPEB costs7 11 9 
Total benefit costs recognized as expense$18 $20 $23 

152
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended
December 31, 2018		 Year Ended
December 31, 2017		 Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016		  Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016
Pension costs$14
 $6
 $2
  $4
OPEB costs9
 6
 2
  —
Total benefit costs recognized as expense$23
 $12
 $4
  $4
Table of Contents

Market-Related Value of Assets Held in PostretirementPension Benefit Trusts


We use the calculated value method to determine the market-related value of the assets held in the trust for purposes of calculating pension costs. We include all gains or losses in the market-related value of assets over a rolling four-year period. Each year, 25% of such gains and losses for the current year and for each of the preceding three years is included in the market-related value. Each year, the market-related value of assets is increased for contributions to the plan and investment income and is decreased for benefit payments and expenses for that year.



Detailed Information Regarding Pension Benefits


The following information is based on a December 31, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 20162018 measurement dates:
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Pension Cost:
Discount rate (Vistra Plan)3.24 %4.37 %3.74 %
Discount rate (Dynegy Plan and EEI Plan)3.24 %4.37 %4.05 %
Expected return on plan assets (Vistra Plan)4.44 %4.80 %4.56 %
Expected return on plan assets (Dynegy Plan)5.28 %5.31 %5.94 %
Expected return on plan assets (EEI Plan)5.45 %5.56 %4.74 %
Expected rate of compensation increase (Vistra Plan)3.29 %3.35 %3.62 %
Expected rate of compensation increase (Dynegy Plan and EEI Plan)3.29 %3.35 %3.50 %
Interest crediting rate for cash balance plans (Vistra Plan)3.50 %3.50 %3.50 %
Interest crediting rate for cash balance plans (Dynegy Plan and EEI Plan)3.50 %3.50 %4.25 %
Components of Net Pension Cost:
Service cost$6 $7 $15 
Interest cost20 25 21 
Expected return on assets(23)(26)(23)
Amortization of unrecognized amounts1 0 0 
Immediate pension cost7 3 1 
Net periodic pension cost$11 $9 $14 
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income:
Net loss$17 $11 $14 
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income$28 $20 $28 
Assumptions Used to Determine Benefit Obligations:
Discount rate2.50 %3.24 %4.37 %
Expected rate of compensation increase3.41 %3.29 %3.35 %
Interest crediting rate for cash balance plans3.00 %3.50 %3.50 %
 Successor
 Year Ended
December 31, 2018		 Year Ended
December 31, 2017		 Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Pension Cost:     
Discount rate (Vistra Energy Plan)3.74% 4.31% 3.79%
Discount rate (Dynegy Plan & EEI Plan)4.05% —% —%
Expected return on plan assets (Vistra Energy Plan)4.56% 4.86% 4.89%
Expected return on plan assets (Dynegy Plan)5.94% —% —%
Expected return on plan assets (EEI Plan)4.74% —% —%
Expected rate of compensation increase (Vistra Energy Plan)3.62% 3.50% 3.50%
Expected rate of compensation increase (Dynegy Plan & EEI Plan)3.50% —% —%
Interest crediting rate for cash balance plans (Vistra Energy Plan)3.50% 4.00% 4.00%
Interest crediting rate for cash balance plans (Dynegy Plan & EEI Plan)4.25% —% —%
Components of Net Pension Cost:     
Service cost$15
 $5
 $2
Interest cost21
 6
 1
Expected return on assets(23) (5) (1)
Immediate pension cost$1
 $—
 $—
Net periodic pension cost$14
 $6
 $2
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income:     
Net (gain) loss$14
 $3
 $(4)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income$28
 $9
 $(2)
Assumptions Used to Determine Benefit Obligations:     
Discount rate (Vistra Plan)4.37% 3.74% 4.31%
Expected rate of compensation increase (Vistra Plan)3.35% 3.62% 3.50%
Discount rate (Dynegy Plan)4.37% —% —%
Expected rate of compensation increase (Dynegy Plan)3.35% —% —%
Interest crediting rate for cash balance plans (Vistra Energy Plan)3.50% 3.50% 4.00%
Interest crediting rate for cash balance plans (Dynegy Plan & EEI)3.50% —% —%


For the year ended December 31, 2020, the net actuarial loss of $29 million was driven by losses attributable to decreasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets, actuarial assumption updates to reflect current market conditions and plan amendments, partially offset by gains attributable to actual asset performance exceeding expectations, life expectancy updates, annuity purchases, lump sum windows and plan experience different than expected.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the net actuarial loss of $16 million was driven by losses attributable to decreasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets, actuarial assumption updates to reflect current market conditions, annuity purchases, plan amendments and plan experience different than expected, partially offset by gains attributable to actual asset performance exceeding expectations and life expectancy updates.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, the net actuarial loss of $14 million was driven by losses attributable to actual asset performance falling short of expectations and plan experience different than expected, partially offset by gains attributable to increasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets, economic assumption updates to reflect current market conditions and life expectancy projection updates.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the net actuarial loss of $3 million was driven by losses attributable to decreasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets and demographic assumption updates to reflect current expectations, partially offset by gains attributable to actual asset performance exceeding expectations, economic assumption updates to reflect current market conditions, life expectancy projection updates and plan experience different than expected.

For the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016, the net actuarial gain of $4 million was driven by gains attributable to increasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets and plan experience different than expected, partially offset by losses attributable to actual asset performance falling short of expectations.



153
Table of Contents
 Successor
 Year Ended December 31,
 2018 2017
Change in Pension Obligation:   
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of period$163
 $144
Acquisitions502
 —
Service cost15
 5
Interest cost21
 6
Settlement(28) —
Actuarial (gain) loss(34) 13
Benefits paid(24) (5)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year$615
 $163
Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year$611
 $157
Change in Plan Assets:   
Fair value of assets at beginning of period$128
 $117
Acquisitions428
 —
Employer contributions12
 —
Settlement(28) —
Actual gain (loss) on assets(26) 16
Benefits paid(24) (5)
Fair value of assets at end of year$490
 $128
Funded Status:   
Projected pension benefit obligation$(615) $(163)
Fair value of assets490
 128
Funded status at end of year$(125) $(35)
Amounts Recognized in the Balance Sheet Consist of:   
Other current liabilities$—
 $—
Other noncurrent liabilities(125) (35)
Net liability recognized$(125) $(35)
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Consist of:   
Net gain (loss)$(13) $1


Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Change in Pension Obligation:
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of period$674 $615 
Service cost6 7 
Interest cost20 25 
Lump-sum window(6)0 
Annuity purchase(29)(18)
Actuarial loss46 93 
Benefits paid(68)(48)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year$643 $674 
Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year$639 $669 
Change in Plan Assets:
Fair value of assets at beginning of period$528 $490 
Employer contributions16 0 
Lump-sum window(6)0 
Annuity purchase(29)(18)
Actual gain on assets40 102 
Benefits paid(64)(46)
Fair value of assets at end of year$485 $528 
Funded Status:
Projected pension benefit obligation$(643)$(674)
Fair value of assets485 528 
Funded status at end of year$(158)$(146)
Amounts Recognized in the Balance Sheet Consist of:
Other noncurrent liabilities$(158)$(146)
Net liability recognized$(158)$(146)
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Consist of:
Net (loss)$(42)$(24)

The following table provides information regarding pension plans with projected benefit obligation (PBO) and accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) in excess of the fair value of plan assets.
December 31,
20202019
Pension Plans with PBO and ABO in Excess Of Plan Assets:
Projected benefit obligations$643 $674 
Accumulated benefit obligation$639 $669 
Plan assets$485 $528 

154
 December 31,
 2018 2017
Pension Plans with PBO and ABO in Excess Of Plan Assets:   
Projected benefit obligations$615
 $163
Accumulated benefit obligation$611
 $157
Plan assets$490
 $128
Table of Contents

Pension Plan Investment Strategy and Asset Allocations


Our investment objective for the Retirement Plan is to invest in a suitable mix of assets to meet the future benefit obligations at an acceptable level of risk, while minimizing the volatility of contributions. Fixed income securities held primarily consist of corporate bonds from a diversified range of companies, U.S. Treasuries and agency securities and money market instruments. Equity securities are held to enhance returns by participating in a wide range of investment opportunities. International equity securities are used to further diversify the equity portfolio and may include investments in both developed and emerging markets. Real estate and credit strategies (primarily high yield bonds and emerging market debt) provide additional portfolio diversification and return potential.



The target asset allocation ranges of pension plan investments by asset category are as follows:
Target Allocation Ranges
Asset Category:Vistra PlanDynegy PlanEEI Plan
Fixed income65 %-75%45 %-55%40 %-50%
Global equity securities16 %-24%30 %-38%34 %-42%
Real estate4 %-8%8 %-12%10 %-14%
Credit strategies3 %-7%6 %-10%7 %-11%
 Target Allocation Ranges
Asset Category:Vistra Energy Plan Dynegy Plan EEI Plan
Fixed income65%-75% 45%-55% 43%-53%
Global equity securities16%-24% 29%-37% 30%-38%
Real estate4%-8% 8%-12% 9%-13%
Credit strategies3%-7% 6%-10% 6%-10%


Expected Long-Term Rate of Return on Assets Assumption


The Retirement Plan strategic asset allocation is determined in conjunction with the plan's advisors and utilizes a comprehensive Asset-Liability modeling approach to evaluate potential long-term outcomes of various investment strategies. The study incorporates long-term rate of return assumptions for each asset class based on historical and future expected asset class returns, current market conditions, rate of inflation, current prospects for economic growth, and taking into account the diversification benefits of investing in multiple asset classes and potential benefits of employing active investment management.
Retirement Plan
Expected Long-Term Rate of Return
Asset Class:Vistra PlanDynegy PlanEEI Plan
Fixed income securities2.4 %2.3 %2.3 %
Global equity securities7.3 %7.3 %7.3 %
Real estate5.6 %5.6 %5.6 %
Credit strategies4.8 %4.8 %4.8 %
Weighted average3.8 %4.4 %4.7 %
 Retirement Plan
 Expected Long-Term Rate of Return
Asset Class:Vistra Energy Plan Dynegy Plan EEI Plan
Fixed income securities4.0% 3.9% 3.9%
Global equity securities7.5% 7.5% 7.5%
Real estate5.4% 5.4% 5.4%
Credit strategies6.8% 6.8% 6.8%
Weighted average4.8% 5.3% 5.6%



Fair Value Measurement of Pension Plan Assets


At December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, all of the Retirement Plan assets were measured at fair value on a recurring basisusing the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) and consisted of the following:
December 31,
2018 2017Year Ended December 31,
Level 1 Level 2 Total Level 220202019
Asset Category:       Asset Category:
Interest-bearing cash$—
 $(6) $(6) $(7)
Cash commingled trustsCash commingled trusts11 10 
Equity securities:Equity securities:
Global equitiesGlobal equities153 169 
Fixed income securities:       Fixed income securities:
Corporate bonds (a)57
 61
 118
 65
Corporate bonds (a)207 211 
U.S. Treasuries—
 25
 25
 29
Government bondsGovernment bonds37 50 
Other (b)—
 6
 6
 7
Other (b)32 37 
Total assets categorized as Level 1 or 257
 86
 143
 94
Assets measured at net asset value (c):       
Commingled trusts    18
 2
Equity securities:       
U.S.    119
 14
International    73
 13
Fixed income securities:       
Corporate bonds (a)    137
 5
Real estateReal estate45 51 
Total assets measured at net asset value    347
 34
Total assets measured at net asset value$485 $528 
Total assets

 

 $490
 $128
___________
(a)Substantially all corporate bonds are rated investment grade by a major ratings agency such as Moody's.
(b)Other consists primarily of taxable municipal bonds.
(c)Certain investments measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in this line are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to total Vistra Retirement Plan assets.

(a)Substantially all corporate bonds are rated investment grade by a major ratings agency such as Moody's.

(b)Consists primarily of high-yield bonds, emerging market debt and bank loans.

155
Table of Contents
Detailed Information Regarding Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions


The following OPEB information is based on a December 31, 20182020 measurement date:
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
Discount rate (Vistra Plan)3.25 %4.35 %3.67 %
Discount rate (Split-Participant Plan)3.25 %4.35 %3.67 %
Discount rate (Dynegy Plan)3.25 %4.35 %4.04 %
Expected return on plan assets (EEI Union)7.07 %5.36 %5.10 %
Expected return on plan assets (EEI Salaried)3.43 %4.70 %4.47 %
Components of Net Postretirement Benefit Cost:
Service cost$2 $2 $2 
Interest cost4 6 5 
Expected return on plan assets(2)(1)(1)
Amortization of unrecognized amounts4 3 3 
Immediate postretirement benefit cost(1)1 0 
Net periodic OPEB cost$7 $11 $9 
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income:
Net (gain) loss and prior service (credit) cost$5 $0 $(6)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income$12 $11 $3 
Assumptions Used to Determine Benefit Obligations at Period End:
Discount rate2.51 %3.25 %4.35 %
 Successor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018 Year Ended December 31, 2017 Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Benefit Cost:     
Discount rate (Vistra Energy Plan)3.67% 4.11% 4.00%
Discount rate (Oncor Plan)—% 4.18% 3.69%
Discount rate (Dynegy Plan)4.04% —% —%
Expected return on plan assets (EEI Union)5.10% —% —%
Expected return on plan assets (EEI Salaried)4.47% —% —%
Components of Net Postretirement Benefit Cost:     
Service cost$2
 $2
 $1
Interest cost5
 4
 1
Expected return on plan assets(1) —
 —
Amortization of unrecognized amounts3
 —
 —
Plan amendments (a)—
 —
 (4)
Net periodic OPEB cost (income)$9
 $6
 $(2)
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income:     
Net (gain) loss and prior service (credit) cost$(6) $26
 $(5)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income$3
 $32
 $(7)
Assumptions Used to Determine Benefit Obligations at Period End:     
Discount rate (Vistra Energy Plan)4.35% 3.67% 4.11%
Discount rate (Split-Participant Plan)4.35% 3.67% —%
Discount rate (Oncor Plan)—% —% 4.18%
Discount rate (Dynegy Plan)4.35% —% —%
Expected return on plan assets (EEI Union)5.36% —% —%
Expected return on plan assets (EEI Salaried)4.70% —% —%
___________
(a)Curtailment gain recognized as other income in the statements of consolidated income (loss) as a result of discontinued life insurance benefits for active employees.


For the year ended December 31, 2020, the net actuarial loss of $10 million was driven by losses attributable to decreasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets and plan experience different than expected, partially offset by gains attributable to actual asset performance exceeding expectations, life expectancy updates and updates to health care claims and trend assumptions.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the net actuarial loss of $5 million was driven by losses attributable to decreasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets and plan experience different than expected, partially offset by gains attributable to actual asset performance exceeding expectations, life expectancy changes, updates to health care related assumptions and changes due to the repeal of certain Affordable Care Act fees.

For the period ended December 31, 2018, the net actuarial gainloss of $7 million was driven by gains attributable to increasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets, life expectancy projection updates and updates to health care related assumptions, partially offset by losses attributable to actual asset performance falling short of expectations and plan experience different than expected.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the net actuarial loss of $15 million was driven by losses attributable to decreasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets, demographic assumption updates to reflect current expectations and updates to health care related assumptions, partially offset by gains attributable to life expectancy projection updates and plan experience different than expected.

For the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016, the net actuarial gain of $5 million was driven by gains attributable to increasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets and plan experience different than expected.



156
Table of Contents
 Year Ended December 31,
 2018 2017
Change in Postretirement Benefit Obligation:   
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$115
 $88
Acquisition37
 —
Service cost2
 2
Interest cost5
 4
Participant contributions2
 2
Plan amendments (a)4
 11
Actuarial (gain) loss(9) 15
Benefits paid(12) (7)
Benefit obligation at end of year$144
 $115
Change in Plan Assets:   
Fair value of assets at beginning of year$—
 $—
Acquisition32
 —
Employer contributions8
 5
Participant contributions2
 2
Benefits paid(12) (7)
Actual loss on assets(1) —
Fair value of assets at end of year$29
 $—
Funded Status:   
Benefit obligation$(144) $(115)
Fair value of assets29
 —
Funded status at end of year$(115) $(115)
Amounts Recognized on the Balance Sheet Consist of:   
Other noncurrent assets$14
 $—
Other current liabilities$(8) $(6)
Other noncurrent liabilities(121) (109)
Net liability recognized$(115) $(115)
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Consist of:   
Net loss and prior service cost$15
 $20

___________
Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Change in Postretirement Benefit Obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$151 $144 
Service cost2 2 
Interest cost4 6 
Participant contributions3 3 
Actuarial loss12 10 
Benefits paid(15)(14)
Benefit obligation at end of year$157 $151 
Change in Plan Assets:
Fair value of assets at beginning of year$34 $29 
Employer contributions9 9 
Participant contributions3 3 
Benefits paid(13)(13)
Actual gain on assets4 6 
Fair value of assets at end of year$37 $34 
Funded Status:
Benefit obligation$(157)$(151)
Fair value of assets37 34 
Funded status at end of year$(120)$(117)
Amounts Recognized on the Balance Sheet Consist of:
Other noncurrent assets$23 $18 
Other current liabilities$(9)$(9)
Other noncurrent liabilities(134)(126)
Net liability recognized$(120)$(117)
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Consist of:
Net loss and prior service cost$20 $15 
(a)For the year ended December 31, 2018, plan amendments relate to changes in Dynegy plans and retiree medical cost structure. For the year ended December 31, 2017, plan amendments relate to the contractual arrangement with Oncor covering Split Participants.


The following tables provide information regarding the assumed health care cost trend rates.
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates-Not Medicare Eligible:
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year6.20 %6.40 %
Rate to which the cost trend is expected to decline (the ultimate trend rate)4.50 %4.50 %
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate20292029
Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates-Medicare Eligible:
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year (Vistra Plan, EEI Union and EEI Salaried)9.10 %8.60 %
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year (Split-Participant Plan)8.80 %8.30 %
Rate to which the cost trend is expected to decline (the ultimate trend rate)4.50 %4.50 %
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate20302029
 Successor
 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates-Not Medicare Eligible:   
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year6.70% 7.00%
Rate to which the cost trend is expected to decline (the ultimate trend rate)4.50% 4.50%
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate2026
 2026
Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates-Medicare Eligible:   
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year9.90% 10.66%
Rate to which the cost trend is expected to decline (the ultimate trend rate)4.50% 4.50%
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate2027
 2026



Fair Value Measurement of OPEB Plan Assets


At December 31, 2018,2020 and 2019, the Vistra Energy OPEB plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis totaled $37 million and $34 million, respectively, and consisted of $29 million and consisted$26 million, respectively, of $21 million of U.SU.S. equities classified as Level 1 and $8 million and $8 million, respectively, of U.S. Treasuries and municipal bonds classified as Level 2.


157
Table of Contents
Significant Concentrations of Risk


The plans' investments are exposed to risks such as interest rate, capital market and credit risks. We seek to optimize return on investment consistent with levels of liquidity and investment risk which are prudent and reasonable, given prevailing capital market conditions and other factors specific to us. While we recognize the importance of return, investments will be diversified in order to minimize the risk of large losses unless, under the circumstances, it is clearly prudent not to do so. There are also various restrictions and guidelines in place including limitations on types of investments allowed and portfolio weightings for certain investment securities to assist in the mitigation of the risk of large losses.


Assumed Discount Rate


We selected the assumed discount raterates using the Aon AA Above Median yield curve, which is based on corporate bond yields and at December 31, 20182020 consisted of 377305 corporate bonds with an average rating of AA using Moody's, Standard & Poor's Rating ServicesS&P and Fitch Ratings, Ltd. ratings.


Contributions


Successor— For the Successor period for the year ended December 31, 2018, a contribution totaling $12 million was made to the Retirement Plan. No contributions were madeContributions to the Retirement Plan for the Successor period for the yearyears ended December 31, 20172020, 2019 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016. No2018 totaled $16 million, 0 and $12 million, respectively, and $1 million in contributions to the Retirement Plan are expected to be made in 2019.2021. OPEB plan funding for the Successor period for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 totaled $8$9 million, $5$9 million and $1$8 million, respectively, and funding in 20192021 is expected to total $8$9 million.

Predecessor— In September 2016, a cash contribution totaling $2 million was made to the EFH Retirement Plan, all of which was contributed by our Predecessor. OPEB plan funding for the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016 totaled $3 million.


Future Benefit Payments


Estimated future benefit payments to beneficiaries are as follows:
202120222023202420252026-2030
Pension benefits$49 $43 $43 $40 $52 $188 
OPEB$10 $10 $10 $10 $9 $41 
 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-28
Pension benefits$46
 $45
 $46
 $46
 $46
 $216
OPEB$10
 $11
 $11
 $11
 $11
 $49


Qualified Savings Plans


Our employees may participate in a qualified savings plan (the Thrift Plan). This plan is a participant-directed defined contribution plan intended to qualify under Section 401(a) of the Code and is subject to the provisions of ERISA. Under the terms of the Thrift Plan, employees who do not earn more than the IRS threshold compensation limit used to determine highly compensated employees may contribute, through pre-tax salary deferrals and/or after-tax payroll deductions, the lesser of 75% of their regular salary or wages or the maximum amount permitted under applicable law. Employees who earn more than such threshold may contribute from 1% to 20% of their regular salary or wages. Employer matching contributions are also made in an amount equal to 100% (75% for employees covered under the Traditionaltraditional formula in the Retirement Plan Formula)Plan) of the first 6% of employee contributions. Employer matching contributions are made in cash and may be allocated by participants to any of the plan's investment options.


At the Merger Date, Vistra Energy assumed Dynegy's participant-directed defined contribution plan. In January 2019, this plan was merged into the Thrift Plan.


Aggregate employer contributions to the qualified savings plans totaled $24$34 million, $19 million, $5$27 million and $16$24 million for the Successor period for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016, respectively.



158
Table of Contents

20.    
18.STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION


Vistra Energy 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan


On the Effective Date, the Vistra Energy board of directors (Board) adopted the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (2016 Incentive Plan), under which an aggregate of 22,500,000 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance as equity-based awards to our non-employee directors, employees, and certain other persons. Following approval of the Board and approval by the stockholders at the 2019 annual meeting of the Company, the 2016 Incentive Plan was amended to increase the maximum number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2016 Incentive Plan to 37,500,000. The Board or any committee duly authorized by the Board will administer the 2016 Incentive Plan and has broad authority under the 2016 Incentive Plan to, among other things: (a) select participants, (b) determine the types of awards that participants are to receive and the number of shares that are to be subject to such awards and (c) establish the terms and conditions of awards, including the price (if any) to be paid for the shares of the award. The types of awards that may be granted under the 2016 Incentive Plan include stock options, RSUs, restricted stock, performance awards and other forms of awards granted or denominated in shares of Vistra Energy common stock, as well as certain cash-based awards.


If any stock option or other stock-based award granted under the 2016 Incentive Plan expires, terminates or is canceled for any reason without having been exercised in full, the number of shares of Vistra Energy common stock underlying any unexercised award shall again be available for awards under the 2016 Incentive Plan. If any shares of restricted stock, performance awards or other stock-based awards denominated in shares of Vistra Energy common stock awarded under the 2016 Incentive Plan are forfeited for any reason, the number of forfeited shares shall again be available for purposes of awards under the 2016 Incentive Plan. Any award under the 2016 Incentive Plan settled in cash shall not be counted against the maximum share limitation. No awards under the 2016 Incentive Plan have been settled in cash since the Effective Date.


As is customary in incentive plans of this nature, each share limit and the number and kind of shares available under the 2016 Incentive Plan and any outstanding awards, as well as the exercise or purchase price of awards, and performance targets under certain types of performance-based awards, are required to be adjusted in the event of certain reorganizations, mergers, combinations, recapitalizations, stock splits, stock dividends or other similar events that change the number or kind of shares outstanding, and extraordinary dividends or distributions of property to the Vistra Energy stockholders.


Assumption of Dynegy Stock Compensation Plans


At the Merger Date, Dynegy stock options and equity-based awards outstanding immediately prior to the Merger Date were generally automatically converted upon completion of the Merger into stock options and equity-based awards, respectively, with respect to Vistra Energy'sVistra's common stock, after giving effect to the Exchange Ratio.
Instrument TypeDynegy Awards Prior to the Merger DateVistra Awards Converted at the Merger DateFair Value of Awards (a)Instrument TypeDynegy Awards Prior to the Merger DateVistra Awards Converted at the Merger DateFair Value of Awards (a) at the Merger Date
Stock Options4,096,027
2,670,610
$10
Stock Options4,096,027 2,670,610 $10 
Restricted Stock Units5,718,148
3,056,689
61
Restricted Stock Units5,718,148 3,056,689 61 
Performance Units1,538,133
938,721
18
Performance Units1,538,133 938,721 18 
Total $89
Total$89 
____________
(a)$26 million was attributable to pre-combination service and considered part of the purchase price (see Note 2). $33 million was recognized immediately as compensation expense due to accelerated vesting as a result of the Merger. $30 million will be amortized as compensation expense over the remaining service period and is recorded in additional paid in capital in the consolidated balance sheet.

(a)$26 million was attributable to pre-combination service and considered part of the purchase price (see Note 2). $33 million was recognized immediately as compensation expense due to accelerated vesting as a result of the Merger. $30 million will be amortized as compensation expense over the remaining service period and is recorded in additional paid in capital in the consolidated balance sheet.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense


Stock-based compensation expense is reported as SG&A in the statementconsolidated statements of consolidated net income (loss)operations as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Total stock-based compensation expense$63 $47 $73 
Income tax benefit(15)(9)(15)
Stock based-compensation expense, net of tax$48 $38 $58 

159
 Successor
 Year Ended December 31, Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
 2018 2017 
Total stock-based compensation expense$73
 $19
 $3
Income tax benefit(15) (7) (1)
Stock based-compensation expense, net of tax$58
 $12
 $2
Table of Contents


Stock Options


The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The risk-free interest rate used in the option valuation model was based on yields available on the grant dates for U.S. Treasury Strips with maturity consistent with the expected life assumption. The expected term of the option represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding and is based on the SEC Simplified Method (midpoint of average vesting time and contractual term). Expected volatility is based on an average of the historical, daily volatility of a peer group selected by Vistra Energy over a period consistent with the expected life assumption ending on the grant date. We assumed no dividend yield in the valuation of the options.options granted from 2016 through 2018, and assumed 2.3% and 1.9% dividend yields in the valuation of options granted in 2020 and 2019, respectively. These options may be exercised over either three- or four-year graded vesting periods and will expire 10 years from the grant date.


The 2016 Incentive Plan includes an anti-dilutive provision that requires any outstanding option awards to be adjusted for the effect of equity restructurings. In March 2017, the Board declared that the exercise price of each outstanding option be reduced by $2.32, the amount per share of common stock related to the Special Dividend (see Note 16).

Issuance of Merger-related Stock Options —At the Merger Date, we issued 5.2 million stock options to certain members of management, which are subject to performance and service conditions for vesting. The performance condition is based on the Company's achievement of certain merger related targets measuredwhich were achieved as of December 31, 2019. Compensation cost has beenwas recognized in 2018, 2019 and 2020 based on graded vesting over 4 and 5 years since the date of issuance because we estimateestimated achievement of the target iswas likely to occur.


Stock options outstanding at December 31, 20182020 are all held by current or former employees. The following table summarizes our stock option activity:
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Stock Options
(in thousands)		Weighted
Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions)
Total outstanding at beginning of period13,535 $18.73 7.3$69.3 
Granted3,014 $22.98 
Exercised(251)$13.62 
Forfeited or expired(268)$20.74 
Total outstanding at end of period16,030 $19.58 6.7$30.8 
Exercisable at December 31, 20206,871 $16.83 5.9$30.5 
 Successor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018
 
Stock Options
(in thousands)
 
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
 Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions)
Total outstanding at beginning of period8,136
 $14.44
 9.0 $32.4
Awards converted at Merger Date2,671
 $23.19
    
Granted5,268
 $19.67
 
 

Exercised(1,082) $13.91
 
 

Forfeited or expired(494) $15.14
 
 

Total outstanding at end of period14,499
 $17.97
 7.3 $85.1
Exercisable at December 31, 20184,696
 $18.88
 5.2 $32.6


At December 31, 2018, $482020, $27 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options granted under the 2016 Incentive Plan are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 32 years.



Restricted Stock Units


The following table summarizes our restricted stock unit activity:
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Restricted Stock Units
(in thousands)		Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value
Total nonvested at beginning of period2,538 $20.99 
Granted1,209 $22.50 
Vested(1,456)$19.48 
Forfeited(39)$21.89 
Total nonvested at end of period2,252 $22.35 
 Successor
 Year Ended December 31, 2018
 
Restricted Stock Units
(in thousands)
 
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value
 Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions)
Total outstanding at beginning of period2,375
 $16.91
 1.9 $43.5
Awards converted at Merger Date3,057
 $15.52
    
Granted133
 $22.41
 
 

Exercised(2,114) $15.48
 
 

Forfeited or expired(225) $16.69
 
 

Total outstanding at end of period3,226
 $16.77
 1.1 $73.8
Expected to vest3,222
 $16.85
 1.0 $73.7


At December 31, 2018, $402020, $27 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock units granted under the 2016 Incentive Plan are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 32 years.


160
Table of Contents
Performance Stock Units


In October 2017, February 2019 and February 2020, we issued Performance Stock Units (PSUs) to certain members of management. All PSUs have a three years performance period and a payout opportunity of 0-200% of target (100%), which is intended to be settled in shares of Vistra common stock. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had not yet established the significantfinal terms of the previously issued PSUs relevant to vesting (scorecard, thresholds, and targets) for the entire measurement period; therefore, a grant date for financial accounting purposes hashad not occurred. In February 2020, the final terms were established for the October 2017 issuance and a grant date for financial accounting purposes had occurred. In March 2020, we began recognizing compensation cost ratably over the remaining 13-month vesting period for the October 2017 issuance. In February 2021, the final terms were established for the February 2019 issuance and a grant date for financial accounting purposes has occurred. In March 2021, we will begin recognizing compensation cost ratably over the remaining 12-month vesting period for the February 2019 issuance. Additional PSUs were issued to certain members of management in February 2021 with the grant date for accounting purposes not yet established. The following table summarizes our PSU activity:

Year Ended December 31, 2020
Performance Stock Units
(in thousands)		Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value
Total nonvested at beginning of period0 $0 
Granted473 $23.43 
Vested(21)$23.43 
Forfeited(1)$23.43 
Total nonvested at end of period451 $23.43 


21.RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

At December 31, 2020, $4 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested performance stock units granted under the 2016 Incentive Plan is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 3 months.
Successor


161
Table of Contents

19.RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In connection with Emergence, we entered into agreements with certain of our affiliates and with parties who received shares of common stock and TRA Rights in exchange for their claims.


Registration Rights Agreement


Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, on the Effective Date, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the Registration Rights Agreement) with certain selling stockholders providing for registration of the resale of the Vistra Energy common stock held by such selling stockholders.


In December 2016, we filed a Form S-1 registration statement with the SEC to register for resale the shares of Vistra Energy common stock held by certain significant stockholders pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, which was declared effective by the SEC in May 2017. The registration statement was amended in March 2018. Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, in June 2018, we filed a post-effective amendment to the Form S-1 registration statement on Form S-3, which was declared effective by the SEC in July 2018. Among other things, under the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement:


•if we propose to file certain types of registration statements under the Securities Act with respect to an offering of equity securities, we will be required to use our reasonable best efforts to offer the other parties to the Registration Rights Agreement the opportunity to register all or part of their shares on the terms and conditions set forth in the Registration Rights Agreement; and



•the selling stockholders received the right, subject to certain conditions and exceptions, to request that we file registration statements or amend or supplement registration statements, with the SEC for an underwritten offering of all or part of their respective shares of Vistra Energy common stock (a Demand Registration), and the Company is required to cause any such registration statement or amendment or supplement (a) to be filed with the SEC promptly and, in any event, on or before the date that is 45 days, in the case of a registration statement on Form S-1, or 30 days, in the case of a registration statement on Form S-3, after we receive the written request from the relevant selling stockholders to effectuate the Demand Registration (as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement) and (b) to become effective as promptly as reasonably practicable and in any event no later than 120 days after it is initially filed.


All expenses of registration under the Registration Rights Agreement, including the legal fees of one counsel retained by or on behalf of the selling stockholders, will be paid by us. Legal fee expenses paid or accrued by Vistra Energy on behalf of the selling stockholders totaled less than $1 million during each of the years ended December 31, 20182020, 2019 and 2017.2018.


Tax Receivable Agreement


On the Effective Date, Vistra Energy entered into the TRA with a transfer agent on behalf of certain former first lienfirst-lien creditors of TCEH. See Note 108 for discussion of the TRA.


Share Repurchase Transaction


In November 2018, the disinterested members of the Board considered and approved (in accordance with the Company's corporate governance guidelines) a share repurchase transaction, whereby Apollo Management Holdings L.P. (Apollo) and the Company, in a privately negotiated transaction, agreed for the Company to directly repurchase 5 million of Vistra common shares from Apollo. This purchase was part of Apollo's larger, 17 million share block trade, with the remaining 12 million shares being sold in a separate unregistered Rule 144 secondary block trade to a broker-dealer, who placed all 12 million shares with institutional investors. The Company repurchased the 5 million shares at the same discounted price (discounted from the November 19, 2018 closing price) that the participating broker paid for the 12 million shares it purchased, and the Company did not pay any additional fees to Apollo or the participating broker for the 5 million shares it repurchased.

Predecessor

162
Table of Contents
See Note 5 for a discussion of certain agreements entered into on the Effective Date between EFH Corp. and Vistra Energy with respect to the separation of the entities, including a separation agreement, a transition services agreement and a tax matters agreement.20.SEGMENT INFORMATION

The following represent our Predecessor's significant related-party transactions. As of the Effective Date, pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, the Sponsor Group, EFH Corp., EFIH, Oncor Holdings and Oncor ceased being affiliates of Vistra Energy and its subsidiaries, including the TCEH Debtors and the Contributed EFH Debtors.

Our retail operations (and prior to the Effective Date, our Predecessor) pay Oncor for services it provides, principally the delivery of electricity. Expenses recorded for these services, reported in fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees, totaled $700 million for the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016.

A former subsidiary of EFH Corp. billed our Predecessor's subsidiaries for information technology, financial, accounting and other administrative services at cost. These charges, which are largely settled in cash and primarily reported in SG&A expenses, totaled $157 million for the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016.

Under Texas regulatory provisions, the trust fund for decommissioning the Comanche Peak nuclear generation facility is funded by a delivery fee surcharge billed to REPs by Oncor, as collection agent, and remitted monthly to Vistra Energy (and prior to the Effective Date, our Predecessor) for contribution to the trust fund with the intent that the trust fund assets, reported in other investments in our consolidated balance sheets, will ultimately be sufficient to fund the future decommissioning liability, reported in asset retirement obligations in our consolidated balance sheets. The delivery fee surcharges remitted to our Predecessor totaled $15 million for the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016. Income and expenses associated with the trust fund and the decommissioning liability incurred by Vistra Energy (and prior to the Effective Date, our Predecessor) are offset by a net change in a receivable/payable that ultimately will be settled through changes in Oncor's delivery fee rates.


EFH Corp. files consolidated federal income tax and Texas state margin tax returns that included our results prior to the Effective Date; however, under a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, our federal income tax and Texas margin tax expense and related balance sheet amounts, including income taxes payable to or receivable from EFH Corp., were recorded as if our Predecessor filed its own corporate income tax return. For the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016, our Predecessor made income tax payments to EFH Corp. totaling $22 million.

Contributions to the EFH Corp. retirement plan by both Oncor and TCEH in 2014, 2015 and 2016 resulted in the EFH Corp. retirement plan being fully funded as calculated under the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). In September 2016, a cash contribution totaling $2 million was made to the EFH Corp. retirement plan, all of which was contributed by TCEH, which resulted in the EFH Retirement Plan continuing to be fully funded as calculated under the provisions of ERISA. On the Effective Date, the EFH Retirement Plan was transferred to Vistra Energy pursuant to a separation agreement between Vistra Energy and EFH Corp.

In 2007, TCEH entered into the TCEH Senior Secured Facilities with syndicates of financial institutions and other lenders. These syndicates included affiliates of GS Capital Partners, which is a member of the Sponsor Group. Affiliates of each member of the Sponsor Group have from time to time engaged in commercial banking transactions with TCEH and/or provided financial advisory services to TCEH, in each case in the normal course of business.

Affiliates of GS Capital Partners were parties to certain commodity and interest rate hedging transactions with our Predecessor in the normal course of business.

Affiliates of the Sponsor Group have sold or acquired debt or debt securities issued by our Predecessor in open market transactions or through loan syndications.


22.SEGMENT INFORMATION


The operations of Vistra Energy are aligned into six6 reportable business segments: (i) Retail, (ii) ERCOT,Texas, (iii) PJM,East, (iv) NY/NE,West, (v) MISOSunset and (vi) Asset Closure. In the third quarter of 2020, Vistra updated its reportable segments to reflect changes in how the Company's Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) makes operating decisions, assesses performance and allocates resources. Management believes the revised reportable segments provide enhanced transparency into the Company's long-term sustainable assets and its commitment to managing the retirement of economically and environmentally challenged plants. The following is a summary of the updated segments:

•The Sunset segment represents plants with announced retirement plans that were previously reported in the ERCOT, PJM and MISO segments. As we announced significant plant closures in the third quarter of 2020, management believes it is important to have a segment which differentiates between operating plants with defined retirement plans and operating plants without defined retirement plans.
•The East segment represents Vistra's electricity generation operations in the Eastern Interconnection of the U.S. electric grid, other than assets that are now part of the Sunset or Asset Closure segments, respectively, and includes operations in PJM, ISO-NE and NYISO that were previously reported in the PJM and NY/NE segments, respectively.
•The West segment represents Vistra's electricity generation operations in CAISO and was previously reported in the Corporate and Other non-segment. As reflected by the Moss Landing and Oakland ESS projects (see Note 3), the Company expects to expand its operations in the West segment.

Our chief operating decision makerCODM reviews the results of these segments separately and allocates resources to the respective segments as part of our strategic operations. A measure of assets is not applicable, as segment assets are not regularly reviewed by the CODM for evaluating performance or allocating resources.


The Retail segment is engaged in retail sales of electricity and related servicesnatural gas to residential, commercial and industrial customers. Substantially all of these activities are conducted by TXU Energy, andAmbit, Value Based Brands, in Texas, Dynegy Energy Services, in Massachusetts, Ohio, Illinois and Pennsylvania and Homefield Energy, TriEagle Energy, Public Power and U.S. Gas & Electric across 19 states in Illinois. Prior to the Merger, the Retail segment was referred to as the Retail Electricity segment.U.S.


The ERCOT, PJM, NY/NE (comprising NYISOTexas and ISO-NE) and MISOEast segments are engaged in electricity generation, wholesale energy sales and purchases, commodity risk management activities, fuel production and fuel logistics management, all largely within their respective ISO market.management. The PJM, NY/NE and MISO segments were established on the Merger Date to reflect markets served by businesses acquired in the Merger. Prior to the Merger,Texas segment represents results from the ERCOT segmentmarket and was referred to as the Wholesale Generation segment.ERCOT segment prior to the third quarter of 2020. The East segment represents results from the PJM, ISO-NE and NYISO markets. We determined it was appropriate to aggregate results from these markets into one reportable segment, East, given similar economic characteristics.


As discussedThe West segment represents results from the CAISO market, including our development of battery ESS projects at our Moss Landing and Oakland power plant sites (see Note 3).

The Sunset segment consists of generation plants with announced retirement plans. Separately reporting the Sunset segment differentiates operating plants with announced retirement plans from our other operating plants in Note 1, the Asset ClosureTexas, East and West segments. We have allocated unrealized gains and losses on the commodity risk management activities to the Sunset segment was established effective January 1, 2018. for the generation plants that have announced retirement plans.

The Asset Closure segment is engaged in the decommissioning and reclamation of retired plants and mines.mines (see Note 4). Separately reporting the Asset Closure segment provides management with better information related to the performance and earnings power of Vistra Energy'sVistra's ongoing operations and facilitates management's focus on minimizing the cost associated with decommissioning and reclamation of retired plants and mines. We have not allocated any unrealized gains or losses on the commodity risk management activities to the Asset Closure segment for the generation plants that were retired in January, February2018, 2019 and May 2018.2020.


Corporate and Other represents the remaining non-segment operations consisting primarily of (i) general corporate expenses, interest, taxes and other expenses related to our support functions that provide shared services to our operating segments and (ii) CAISO operations.segments.



Except as noted in Note 1, the accounting policies of the business segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in Note 1. Our chief operating decision makerCODM uses more than one measure to assess segment performance, including segment net income (loss), which is the measure most comparable to consolidated net income (loss) prepared based on USU.S. GAAP. We account for intersegment sales and transfers as if the sales or transfers were to third parties, that is, at market prices. Certain shared services costs are allocated to the segments.



163
Table of Contents
 Successor
 Year Ended
December 31, 2018		 Year Ended
December 31, 2017		 Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
Operating revenues (a)     
Retail$5,597
 $4,058
 $912
ERCOT2,634
 1,794
 212
PJM1,725
 —
 —
NY/NE817
 —
 —
MISO720
 —
 —
Asset Closure50
 964
 238
Corporate and Other (b)208
 —
 —
Eliminations(2,607) (1,386) (171)
Consolidated operating revenues$9,144
 $5,430
 $1,191
Depreciation and amortization     
Retail$(318) $(430) $(153)
ERCOT(416) (229) (53)
PJM(413) —
 —
NY/NE(152) —
 —
MISO(9) —
 —
Asset Closure—
 (1) —
Corporate and Other (b)(86) (40) (11)
Eliminations

 1
 $1
Consolidated depreciation and amortization$(1,394) $(699) $(216)
Operating income (loss)     
Retail$690
 $461
 $111
ERCOT(70) (118) (271)
PJM100
 —
 —
NY/NE70
 —
 —
MISO36
 —
 —
Asset Closure(50) (68) 16
Corporate and Other (b)(281) (78) (17)
Eliminations(4) 1
 —
Consolidated operating income (loss)$491
 $198
 $(161)
Interest expense and related charges     
Retail$(7) $—
 $—
ERCOT(12) (21) 1
PJM(8) —
 —
NY/NE(2) —
 —
MISO(1) —
 —
Corporate and Other (b)(613) (252) (66)
Eliminations71
 80
 5
Consolidated interest expense and related charges$(572) $(193) $(60)


 Successor
 Year Ended
December 31, 2018		 Year Ended
December 31, 2017		 Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
Income tax (expense) benefit (all Corporate and Other)$45
 $(504) $70
Net income (loss)     
Retail$712
 $495
 $114
ERCOT(55) (114) (268)
PJM100
 —
 —
NY/NE79
 —
 —
MISO35
 —
 —
Asset Closure(49) (63) 17
Corporate and Other (b)(876) (573) (26)
Eliminations(2) 1
 —
Consolidated net income (loss)$(56) $(254) $(163)
Capital expenditures, excluding LTSA     
Retail$1
 $—
 $5
ERCOT283
 150
 84
PJM41
 —
 —
NY/NE10
 —
 —
MISO3
 —
 —
Corporate and Other (b)58
 26
 —
Consolidated capital expenditures$396
 $176
 $89

For the year ended		RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset ClosureCorporate and Other (b)EliminationsConsolidated
Operating revenues (a):
December 31, 2020$8,270 $4,116 $2,415 $282 $1,252 $3 $0 $(4,895)$11,443 
December 31, 20196,872 3,836 2,790 338 1,602 341 0 (3,970)11,809 
December 31, 20185,597 2,497 1,895 208 1,183 371 0 (2,607)9,144 
Depreciation and amortization:
December 31, 2020$(303)$(475)$(721)$(19)$(133)$(22)$(64)$0 $(1,737)
December 31, 2019(292)(472)(680)(19)(120)0 (57)0 (1,640)
December 31, 2018(318)(390)(519)(14)(81)0 (72)0 (1,394)
Operating income (loss):
December 31, 2020$312 $1,761 $73 $39 $(420)$(109)$(137)$0 $1,519 
December 31, 2019155 1,314 398 88 271 (107)(127)1 1,993 
December 31, 2018690 (103)10 35 242 (63)(320)0 491 
Interest expense and related charges:
December 31, 2020$(10)$8 $(7)$10 $(2)$0 $(632)$3 $(630)
December 31, 2019(21)8 (13)0 (4)0 (770)3 (797)
December 31, 2018(7)(12)(10)(1)(1)0 (612)71 (572)
Income tax (expense) benefit:
December 31, 2020$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $(266)$0 $(266)
December 31, 20190 0 0 0 0 0 (290)0 (290)
December 31, 20180 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 45 
Net income (loss):
December 31, 2020$309 $1,760 $41 $50 $(414)$(101)$(1,021)$0 $624 
December 31, 2019134 1,342 400 88 274 (109)(1,204)1 926 
December 31, 2018712 (88)18 34 242 (62)(912)0 (56)
Capital expenditures, including nuclear fuel and excluding LTSA prepayments and development and growth expenditures:
December 31, 2020$2 $388 $71 $2 $46 $0 $91 $0 $600 
December 31, 20191 296 61 2 58 0 69 0 487 
December 31, 20181 280 21 8 36 0 50 0 396 
____________
(a)The following unrealized net gains (losses) from mark-to-market valuations of commodity positions are included in operating revenues:
For the year endedRetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset ClosureCorporate and OtherEliminations (1)Consolidated
December 31, 2020$(11)$677 $(23)$(10)$(140)$0 $0 $(329)$164 
December 31, 20198 575 195 41 168 0 0 (305)682 
December 31, 2018(12)(483)(76)(15)(11)0 0 217 (380)
____________
(1) Amounts offset in fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees in the Retail segment, with no impact to consolidated results.
(b)Income tax expense is not reflected in net income of the segments but is reflected entirely in Corporate and Other net income.

(a)The following unrealized net gains (losses) from mark-to-market valuations of commodity positions are included in operating revenues:
 Successor
 Year Ended
December 31, 2018		 Year Ended
December 31, 2017		 Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
Retail$(12) $18
 $(6)
ERCOT(483) (305) (295)
PJM(50) —
 —
NY/NE(40) —
 —
MISO3
 —
 —
Corporate and Other (b)(15) —
 —
Eliminations (1)217
 154
 113
Consolidated unrealized net losses from mark-to-market valuations of commodity positions included in operating revenues$(380) $(133) $(188)
____________
(1)Amounts offset in fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees in the Retail segment, with no impact to consolidated results.
(b)Other includes CAISO operations. Income tax expense is not reflected in net income of the segments but is reflected entirely in Corporate net income.



164
 December 31,
 2018 2017
Total assets   
Retail$7,699
 $6,156
ERCOT9,347
 6,821
PJM7,188
 —
NY/NE2,722
 —
MISO836
 —
Asset Closure254
 248
Corporate and Other and Eliminations(2,022) 1,375
Consolidated total assets$26,024
 $14,600
Table of Contents

21.SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Prior
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In the third quarter of 2020, we recognized impairment losses of $173 million related to our Kincaid coal generation facility in Illinois and $99 million related to our Zimmer coal generation facility in Ohio, each as a result of a significant decrease in the estimated useful life of the facility, reflecting our recently announced plan to retire both facilities by the end of 2027 in response to the Effective Date,final CCR rule (see Notes 4 and 13). The impairment losses are reported in our Predecessor's chiefSunset segment and include a $260 million write-down of property, plant and equipment and a $12 million write-down of inventory. In determining the fair value of the impaired assets, we equally weighted a market approach valuation based on transactions of similar assets and an income approach valuation discounting our projected cash flows through the respective plant retirement dates.

In the first quarter of 2020, we recognized an impairment loss of $52 million related to our Joppa/EEI coal generation facility in Illinois as a result of a significant decrease in the estimated useful life of the facility, reflecting a decrease in the economic forecast of the facility and changes to the operating decision maker reviewedassumption based on lower forecasted wholesale electricity prices. We also recorded a $32 million impairment to a capacity contract which was linked in part to the retail electricity, wholesale generationJoppa/EEI facility and commodity risk management activities together. Consequently, there were no reportable business segments for TCEH.therefore determined to have a significant decrease in estimated useful life. The impairments are reported in our Sunset segment and include a $45 million write-down of property, plant and equipment, a $32 million write-down of intangible assets and a $7 million write-down of inventory.



Interest Expense and Related Charges
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Interest paid/accrued$467 $576 $537 
Unrealized mark-to-market net losses on interest rate swaps155 220 5 
Amortization of debt issuance costs, discounts and premiums18 9 0 
Debt extinguishment (gain) loss(17)(21)27 
Capitalized interest(21)(12)(12)
Other28 25 15 
Total interest expense and related charges$630 $797 $572 

The weighted average interest rate applicable to the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, taking into account the interest rate swaps discussed in Note 11, was 3.88%, 4.03% and 4.24% at December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

165
Table of Contents
23.SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Other Income and Deductions
Successor  Predecessor
Year Ended December 31, Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016		  Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016		Year Ended December 31,
2018 2017   202020192018
Other income:        Other income:
Insurance settlement (a)Insurance settlement (a)$6 $22 $16 
Funds released from escrow to settle pre-petition claims of our predecessor (b)Funds released from escrow to settle pre-petition claims of our predecessor (b)0 9 0 
Office space sublease rental income (a)(b)$8
 $11
 $2
  $—
0 0 8 
Mineral rights royalty income (b)—
 3
 1
  3
Sale of land (b)3
 4
 —
  —
Curtailment gain on employee benefit plans (a)—
 —
 4
  —
Insurance settlement16
 —
 —
  9
Sale of land (c)Sale of land (c)8 0 3 
Interest income18
 15
 1
  3
Interest income2 10 18 
All other2
 4
 2
  4
All other18 15 2 
Total other income$47
 $37
 $10
  $19
Total other income$34 $56 $47 
Other deductions:        Other deductions:
Write-off of generation equipment (b)—
 2
 —
  45
Adjustment to asbestos liability—
 —
 —
  11
Loss on disposal of investment in NELP (d)Loss on disposal of investment in NELP (d)$29 $0 $0 
All other5
 3
 —
  19
All other13 15 5 
Total other deductions$5
 $5
 $—
  $75
Total other deductions$42 $15 $5 
____________
(a)Reported in Corporate and Other non-segment (Successor period only).
(b)Reported in ERCOT segment (Successor period only).

(a)For the year ended December 31, 2020, $3 million reported in the Corporate and Other non-segment, $2 million reported in the Asset Closure segment and $1 million reported in the Texas segment. The amounts for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, are reported in the Texas segment.
(b)Reported in the Corporate and Other non-segment. Beginning January 1, 2019, our office space sublease rental income related to real estate leases is reported in SG&A expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
(c)For the year ended December 31, 2020, reported in the Asset Closure segment. For the year ended December 31, 2018, reported in the Texas segment.
(d)Reported in the East segment.

Restricted Cash
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Current
Assets		Noncurrent AssetsCurrent
Assets		Noncurrent Assets
Amounts related to remediation escrow accounts$19 $19 $15 $28 
Amounts related to restructuring escrow accounts0 0 43 0 
Amounts related to Ambit customer deposits0 0 19 0 
Amounts related to Ambit commodity trading agreement0 0 62 0 
Amounts related to Ambit letters of credit (Note 11)0 0 8 0 
Total restricted cash$19 $19 $147 $28 

Remediation Escrow—During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, Vistra transferred asset retirement obligations related to several closed plant sites to a third-party remediation company. As part of certain transfers, Vistra deposits funds into an escrow accounts, and the funds are released to the remediation company as milestones are reached in the remediation process. Amounts contractually payable to the third party in exchange for assuming the obligations are included in other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits.

Pre-Petition Claims — On the Effective Date, the TCEH Debtors (together with the Contributed EFH Debtors) emerged from the Chapter 11 Cases and discharged approximately $33.8 billion in liabilities subject to compromise. Initial distributions related to the allowed claims asserted against the TCEH Debtors and the Contributed EFH Debtors commenced subsequent to the Effective Date. Amounts were held in escrow to (1) distribute to holders of contingent and/or disputed unsecured claims that become allowed and/or (2) make distributions to holders of previously allowed unsecured claims, if applicable. In December 2019, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order, Docket No. 13982, sustaining the TCEH Debtors' objection to and liquidating the manifested and unmanifested asbestos claims. As of this filing, the TCEH Debtors believe they have resolved the remaining contingent and/or disputed unsecured claims, and have undertook the necessary steps to modify the claims register accordingly and made final distribution from the escrow to holders of allowed claims. At December 31, 2019, unresolved claims were recorded in Vistra's consolidated balance sheet as other current liabilities, and the related escrow balance were recorded in Vistra's consolidated balance sheet as current restricted cash. All non-priority unsecured claims, including asbestos claims arising before the Petition Date, were satisfied solely from the amounts in escrow.
166
 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
 Current
Assets		 Noncurrent Assets Current
Assets		 Noncurrent Assets
Amounts related to the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities (Note 14)$—
 $—
 $—
 $500
Amounts related to restructuring escrow accounts57
 —
 59
 —
Total restricted cash$57
 $—
 $59
 $500
Table of Contents


Trade Accounts Receivable

December 31,
20202019
Wholesale and retail trade accounts receivable$1,324 $1,401 
Allowance for uncollectible accounts(45)(36)
Trade accounts receivable — net$1,279 $1,365 
 December 31,
 2018 2017
Wholesale and retail trade accounts receivable$1,106
 $596
Allowance for uncollectible accounts(19) (14)
Trade accounts receivable — net$1,087
 $582


Gross trade accounts receivable at December 31, 20182020 and 20172019 included unbilled retail revenues of $350$468 million and $251$494 million, respectively.


Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts Receivable
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable at beginning of period (a)$42 $19 $14 
Increase for bad debt expense110 82 56 
Decrease for account write-offs(107)(65)(51)
Allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable at end of period$45 $36 $19 
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016		  Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016
 2018 2017   
Allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable at beginning of period$14
 $10
 $—
  $9
Increase for bad debt expense56
 43
 10
  20
Decrease for account write-offs(51) (39) —
  (16)
Allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable at end of period$19
 $14
 $10
  $13
____________

(a)Includes a $6 million increase recorded due to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (see Note 1).

Inventories by Major Category
December 31,
20202019
Materials and supplies$260 $278 
Fuel stock236 172 
Natural gas in storage19 19 
Total inventories$515 $469 
 December 31,
 2018 2017
Materials and supplies$286
 $149
Fuel stock115
 83
Natural gas in storage11
 21
Total inventories$412
 $253


Other Investments

December 31,
20202019
Nuclear plant decommissioning trust$1,674 $1,451 
Assets related to employee benefit plans (Note 17)41 37 
Land44 49 
Total investments$1,759 $1,537 
 December 31,
 2018 2017
Nuclear plant decommissioning trust$1,170
 $1,188
Assets related to employee benefit plans (Note 19)31
 —
Land49
 49
Miscellaneous other—
 3
Total other investments$1,250
 $1,240


Investment in Unconsolidated SubsidiariesSubsidiary


On the Merger Date, we assumed Dynegy's 50% interest in Northeast Energy, LP (NELP),NELP, a joint venture with NextEra Energy, Inc., which indirectly ownsowned the Bellingham NEA facility and the Sayreville facility. At December 31, 2018,2019, our estimated investment in NELP totaled $129$123 million.

In December 2019, Dynegy Northeast Generation GP, Inc. and Dynegy Northeast Associates LP, Inc., indirect subsidiaries of Vistra, entered into a transaction agreement with NELP and certain indirect subsidiaries of NextEra Energy, Inc. wherein the indirect subsidiaries of Vistra redeemed their ownership interest in NELP in exchange for 100% ownership interest in NJEA, the company which owns the Sayreville facility. The NELP Transaction was approved by FERC in February 2020, and the NELP Transaction closed on March 2, 2020. As a result of the NELP Transaction, Vistra indirectly owns 100% of the Sayreville facility and no longer has any ownership interest in the Bellingham NEA facility. A loss of $29 million based onwas recognized in connection with the NELP Transaction, reflecting the difference between our preliminary purchase price allocationderecognized investment in NELP and subsequent 2018 activity. Our riskthe value of our acquired 100% interest in NJEA, which was measured in accordance with ASC 805. The loss related tois reported in our equity method investment is limited to our investment balance (see Note 2).consolidated statements of operations in other deductions.


For the year ended December 31, 2018, equity
167
Table of Contents
Equity earnings related to our investment in NELP totaled $3 million, $14 million and $17 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, recorded in equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated investment in our consolidated statements of consolidated net income (loss). Foroperations. We received distributions totaling $3 million, $22 million and $17 million for the yearyears ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we received distributions totaling $17 million.respectively.



Nuclear Decommissioning Trust


Investments in a trust that will be used to fund the costs to decommission the Comanche Peak nuclear generation plant are carried at fair value. Decommissioning costs are being recovered from Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC's (Oncor) customers as a delivery fee surcharge over the life of the plant and deposited by Vistra Energy (and prior to the Effective Date, a subsidiary of TCEH) in the trust fund. Income and expense, including gains and losses associated with the trust fund assets and the decommissioning liability, are offset by a corresponding change in a regulatory asset/liability (currently a regulatory assetliability reported in other noncurrent assets)liabilities and deferred credits) that will ultimately be settled through changes in Oncor's delivery fees rates. If funds recovered from Oncor's customers held in the trust fund are determined to be inadequate to decommission the Comanche Peak nuclear generation plant, Oncor would be required to collect all additional amounts from its customers, with no obligation from Vistra, Energy, provided that Vistra Energy complied with PUCT rules and regulations regarding decommissioning trusts. A summary of the fair market value of investments in the fund follows:
 December 31, 2018
 Cost (a) Unrealized gain Unrealized loss Fair market value
Debt securities (b)$444
 $7
 $(8) $443
Equity securities (c)280
 448
 (1) 727
Total$724
 $455
 $(9) $1,170

 December 31, 2017
 Cost (a) Unrealized gain Unrealized loss Fair market value
Debt securities (b)$418
 $14
 $(2) $430
Equity securities (c)265
 495
 (2) 758
Total$683
 $509
 $(4) $1,188
Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Debt securities (a)$618 $521 
Equity securities (b)1,056 930 
Total$1,674 $1,451 
____________
(a)Includes realized gains and losses on securities sold.
(b)The investment objective for debt securities is to invest in a diversified tax efficient portfolio with an overall portfolio rating of AA or above as graded by S&P or Aa2 by Moody's Investors Services, Inc. The debt securities are heavily weighted with government and municipal bonds and investment grade corporate bonds. The debt securities had an average coupon rate of 3.69% and 3.55% at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and an average maturity of 8 years and 9 years at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(c)The investment objective for equity securities is to invest tax efficiently and to match the performance of the S&P 500 Index for U.S. equity investments and the MSCI Inc. EAFE Index for non-U.S. equity investments.

(a)The investment objective for debt securities is to invest in a diversified tax efficient portfolio with an overall portfolio rating of AA or above as graded by S&P or Aa2 by Moody's. The debt securities are heavily weighted with government and municipal bonds and investment grade corporate bonds. The debt securities had an average coupon rate of 2.91% and 3.42% at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and an average maturity of 10 years and 9 years at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
(b)The investment objective for equity securities is to invest tax efficiently and to match the performance of the S&P 500 Index for U.S. equity investments and the MSCI EAFE Index for non-U.S. equity investments.

Debt securities held at December 31, 20182020 mature as follows: $153$193 million in one to 5five years, $100$185 million in five to 10 years and $190$240 million after 10 years.


The following table summarizes proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities and the related realized gains and losses from such sales.investments in new securities.
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Proceeds from sales of securities$433 $431 $252 
Investments in securities$(455)$(453)$(274)


168
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016		  Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016
 2018 2017   
Realized gains$2
 $9
 $1
  $3
Realized losses$(9) $(11) $—
  $(2)
Proceeds from sales of securities$252
 $252
 $25
  $201
Investments in securities$(274) $(272) $(30)  $(215)
Table of Contents


Property, Plant and Equipment

December 31,
20202019
Power generation and structures$15,222 $15,205 
Land617 622 
Office and other equipment173 164 
Total16,012 15,991 
Less accumulated depreciation(3,614)(2,553)
Net of accumulated depreciation12,398 13,438 
Finance lease right-of-use assets (net of accumulated depreciation)182 59 
Nuclear fuel (net of accumulated amortization of $91 million and $216 million)207 197 
Construction work in progress712 220 
Property, plant and equipment — net$13,499 $13,914 
 December 31,
 2018 2017
Power generation and structures$14,604
 $3,966
Land642
 540
Office and other equipment182
 120
Total15,428
 4,626
Less accumulated depreciation(1,284) (282)
Net of accumulated depreciation14,144
 4,344
Nuclear fuel (net of accumulated amortization of $189 million and $111 million)191
 158
Construction work in progress277
 318
Property, plant and equipment — net$14,612
 $4,820


Depreciation expenseexpenses totaled $1.377 billion, $1.300 billion and $1.024 billion $236 million, $54 million and $401 million for the Successor period for the years ended December 31, 20182020, 2019 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016,2018, respectively.


Our property, plant and equipment consist of our power generation assets, related mining assets, information system hardware, capitalized corporate office lease space and other leasehold improvements. At December 31, 2018, buildings and improvements includes a capital lease for an office building that totaled $62 million with accumulated depreciation of $11 million. The estimated remaining useful lives range from 1 to 3533 years for our property, plant and equipment.



169
Table of Contents
Asset Retirement and Mining Reclamation Obligations (ARO)


These liabilities primarily relate to nuclear generation plant decommissioning, land reclamation related to lignite mining, removalremediation or closure of coal/lignite-fueled plantcoal ash treatment facilitiesbasins, and generation plant asbestos removal and disposal costs. There is no earnings impact with respect to changes in the nuclear plant decommissioning liability, as all costs are recoverable through the regulatory process as part of delivery fees charged by Oncor. We have also identified conditional AROs for asbestos removal and disposal, which are specific to certain generation assets. However, because the period of remediation is indeterminable no removal liabilities have been recognized.


At December 31, 2018,2020, the carrying value of our ARO related to our nuclear generation plant decommissioning totaled $1.276$1.585 billion, which exceedsis lower than the fair value of the assets contained in the nuclear decommissioning trust. Since the costs to ultimately decommission that plant are recoverable through the regulatory rate making process as part of Oncor's delivery fees, a corresponding regulatory assetliability has been recorded to our consolidated balance sheet of $106$89 million in other noncurrent assets.liabilities and deferred credits.



The following table summarizes the changes to these obligations, reported as asset retirement obligationsAROs (current and noncurrent liabilities) in our consolidated balance sheets, for the Successor period for the years ended December 31, 20182020, 2019 and 2017:2018:
Nuclear Plant DecommissioningMining Land ReclamationCoal Ash and OtherTotal
Nuclear Plant Decommissioning Mining Land Reclamation Coal Ash and Other Total
Successor:       
Liability at December 31, 20161,200
 375
 151
 1,726
Additions:       
Accretion33
 18
 8
 59
Adjustment for change in estimates (a)—
 81
 44
 125
Incremental reclamation costs (b)—
 —
 62
 62
Reductions:       
Payments—
 (36) —
 (36)
Liability at December 31, 20171,233
 438
 265
 1,936
Liability at December 31, 2017$1,233 $438 $265 $1,936 
Additions:       Additions:
Accretion43
 22
 28
 93
Accretion43 22 28 93 
Adjustment for change in estimates—
 56
 (89) (33)Adjustment for change in estimates0 56 (89)(33)
Obligations assumed in the Merger—
 2
 475
 477
Obligations assumed in the Merger0 2 475 477 
Reductions:       Reductions:
Payments—
 (76) (24) (100)Payments0 (76)(24)(100)
Liability at December 31, 20181,276
 442
 655
 2,373
Liability at December 31, 20181,276 442 655 2,373 
Additions:Additions:
AccretionAccretion44 22 31 97 
Adjustment for change in estimatesAdjustment for change in estimates0 16 (1)15 
Adjustment for obligations assumed through acquisitionsAdjustment for obligations assumed through acquisitions0 0 (3)(3)
Reductions:Reductions:
PaymentsPayments0 (70)(39)(109)
Liability transfers (a)Liability transfers (a)0 0 (135)(135)
Liability at December 31, 2019Liability at December 31, 20191,320 410 508 2,238 
Additions:Additions:
AccretionAccretion46 20 23 89 
Adjustment for change in estimates (b)Adjustment for change in estimates (b)219 (6)25 238 
Reductions:Reductions:
PaymentsPayments0 (65)(49)(114)
Liability transfers (a)Liability transfers (a)0 0 (15)(15)
Liability at December 31, 2020Liability at December 31, 20201,585 359 492 2,436 
Less amounts due currently—
 (106) (50) (156)Less amounts due currently0 (92)(11)(103)
Noncurrent liability at December 31, 2018$1,276
 $336
 $605
 $2,217
Noncurrent liability at December 31, 2020Noncurrent liability at December 31, 2020$1,585 $267 $481 $2,333 
____________
(a)Amounts primarily relate to the impacts of accelerating the ARO associated with the retirements of the Sandow 4, Sandow 5, Big Brown and Monticello plants (see Note 4).
(b)Amounts primarily relate to liabilities incurred as part of acquiring certain real property through the Alcoa contract settlement (see Note 4).

(a)Represents ARO transferred to a third-party for remediation. Any remaining unpaid third-party obligation has been reclassified to other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits in our consolidated balance sheets.
(b)The adjustment for nuclear plant decommissioning resulted from a new cost estimate completed in 2020. Under applicable accounting standards, the liability is remeasured when significant changes in the amount or timing of cash flows occur, and the PUCT requires a new cost estimate at least every five years. The increase in the liability was driven by changes in assumptions including increased costs for labor, equipment and services and a delay in timing of when the U.S. Department of Energy is estimated to begin accepting spent fuel offsite.

170
Table of Contents
Other Noncurrent Liabilities and Deferred Credits


The balance of other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits consists of the following:
December 31,
20202019
Retirement and other employee benefits (Note 17)$312 $295 
Identifiable intangible liabilities (Note 6)289 286 
Regulatory liability89 131 
Finance lease liabilities206 78 
Uncertain tax positions, including accrued interest12 10 
Liability for third-party remediation31 41 
Environmental allowances0 52 
Accrued severance costs54 12 
Other accrued expenses138 84 
Total other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits$1,131 $989 
 December 31,
 2018 2017
Retirement and other employee benefits$270
 $166
Uncertain tax positions, including accrued interest4
 —
Other66
 54
Total other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits$340
 $220



Fair Value of Debt

December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Long-term debt (see Note 11):Fair Value HierarchyCarrying AmountFair
Value		Carrying AmountFair
Value
Long-term debt under the Vistra Operations Credit FacilitiesLevel 2$2,579 $2,565 $2,715 $2,717 
Vistra Operations Senior NotesLevel 26,634 7,204 6,620 6,926 
Vistra Senior NotesLevel 20 0 774 772 
Forward Capacity AgreementsLevel 345 45 155 155 
Equipment Financing AgreementsLevel 359 59 87 87 
Building FinancingLevel 210 10 16 16 
Other debtLevel 33 3 12 12 
   December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
Long-Term Debt (see Note 14):Fair Value Hierarchy Carrying Amount 
Fair
Value
 Carrying Amount 
Fair
Value
Long-term debt under the Vistra Operations Credit FacilitiesLevel 2 $5,820
 $5,599
 $4,323
 $4,334
Vistra Operations Senior NotesLevel 2 987
 963
 —
 —
Vistra Energy Senior NotesLevel 2 3,819
 3,765
 —
 —
7.000% Amortizing NotesLevel 2 23
 24
 —
 —
Forward Capacity AgreementsLevel 3 221
 221
 —
 —
Equipment Financing AgreementsLevel 3 102
 102
 —
 —
Mandatorily redeemable subsidiary preferred stockLevel 2 70
 70
 70
 70
Building FinancingLevel 2 23
 21
 30
 27


We determine fair value in accordance with accounting standards as discussed in Note 17.15. We obtain security pricing from an independent party who uses broker quotes and third-party pricing services to determine fair values. Where relevant, these prices are validated through subscription services, such as Bloomberg.


Supplemental Cash Flow Information


The following table reconciles cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported in our consolidated statements of consolidated cash flows to the amounts reported in our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 20182020 and 2017:2019:
December 31,
20202019
Cash and cash equivalents$406 $300 
Restricted cash included in current assets19 147 
Restricted cash included in noncurrent assets19 28 
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$444 $475 

171
 December 31,
 2018 2017
Cash and cash equivalents$636
 $1,487
Restricted cash included in current assets57
 59
Restricted cash included in noncurrent assets—
 500
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$693
 $2,046
Table of Contents

The following table summarizes our supplemental cash flow information for the Successor period foryears ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Cash payments related to:
Interest paid$503 $525 $651 
Capitalized interest(21)(12)(12)
Interest paid (net of capitalized interest)$482 $513 $639 
Income taxes paid / (refunds received) (a)$(140)$(76)$67 
Noncash investing and financing activities:
Accrued property, plant and equipment additions (b)$19 $67 $84 
Disposition of investment in NELP$123 $0 $0 
Acquisition of investment in NJEA$90 $0 $0 
Shares issued for tangible equity unit contracts (Note 14)$0 $446 $0 
Land transferred with liability transfers$0 $16 $0 
Vistra common stock issued in the Merger (Notes 2 and 14)$0 $0 $2,245 
____________
(a)For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we paid federal income taxes of 0, 0 and 2017$45 million, respectively, paid state income taxes of $40 million, $42 million and $27 million, respectively, received federal tax refunds of $170 million, $115 million and 0, respectively, and received state tax refunds of $10 million, $3 million and $5 million, respectively.
(b)Represents property, plant and equipment accruals during the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and the Predecessor period from January 1, 2016 through October 2, 2016, respectively.
 Successor  Predecessor
 Year Ended December 31, Period from October 3, 2016
through
December 31, 2016		  Period from January 1, 2016
through
October 2, 2016
 2018 2017   
Cash payments related to:        
Interest paid (a)$651
 $245
 $19
  $1,064
Capitalized interest(12) (7) (3)  (9)
Interest paid (net of capitalized interest) (a)$639
 $238
 $16
  $1,055
Income taxes$67
 $63
 $(2)  $22
Reorganization items (b)$—
 $—
 $—
  $104
Noncash investing and financing activities:        
Construction expenditures (c)$79
 $12
 $1
  $53
Vistra Energy common stock issued in the Merger (Notes 2 and 16)$2,245
 $—
 $—
  $—
____________
(a)Predecessor period includes amountsfor which cash has not been paid for adequate protection.
(b)Represents cash payments made by our Predecessor for legal and other consulting services, including amounts paid on behalf of third parties pursuant to contractual obligations approved by the Bankruptcy Court.
(c)Represents end-of-period accruals for ongoing construction projects.


Quarterly Information (Unaudited)

Unaudited results of operations by quarter are summarized below. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair statement of such amounts have been made. Quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of a full year's operations because of seasonal and other factors. Quarterly amounts may not add to full year amounts due to rounding.
 Successor
 Quarter Ended
 March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31 (b)
2018(a):       
Operating revenues$765
 $2,574
 $3,243
 $2,562
Operating income (loss)$(394) $231
 $650
 $4
Net income (loss)$(306) $105
 $331
 $(186)
Net income (loss) attributable to Vistra Energy$(306) $108
 $330
 $(186)
Net income (loss) per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — basic$(0.71) $0.21
 $0.62
 $(0.35)
Net income (loss) per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — diluted$(0.71) $0.20
 $0.61
 $(0.35)
2017:       
Operating revenues$1,357
 $1,296
 $1,833
 $944
Operating income (loss)$155
 $53
 $452
 $(462)
Net income (loss)$78
 $(26) $273
 $(579)
Net income (loss) attributable to Vistra Energy$78
 $(26) $273
 $(579)
Net income (loss) per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — basic$0.18
 $(0.06) $0.64
 $(1.35)
Net income (loss) per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — diluted$0.18
 $(0.06) $0.64
 $(1.35)
____________
(a)For the year ended December 31, 2018, reflects the results of operations acquired in the Merger.
(b)For the Successor quarter ended December 31, 2017, operating loss includes noncash charges of $183 million related to the generation facilities retirement announcements. Net loss reflects the retirements mentioned above as well as a $451 million reduction of deferred tax assets related to the decrease in the corporate tax rate due to the TCJA (see Note 9), partially offset by $117 million of impacts of the TRA.



24.SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Our senior notes are guaranteed by substantially all of our wholly owned subsidiaries. The following condensed consolidating financial statements present the financial information of (i) Vistra Energy Corp. (Parent), which is the ultimate parent company and issuer of the senior notes with effect as of the Merger Date, on a stand-alone, unconsolidated basis, (ii) the guarantor subsidiaries of Vistra Energy (Guarantor Subsidiaries), (iii) the non-guarantor subsidiaries of Vistra Energy (Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries) and (iv) the eliminations necessary to arrive at the information for Vistra Energy on a consolidated basis. The Guarantor Subsidiaries consistend of the wholly owned subsidiaries, which jointly, severally, fully and unconditionally, guarantee the payment obligations under the senior notes. See Note 14 for discussionperiod.


172
Table of the senior notes.

These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Vistra Energy. The supplemental condensed consolidating financial information has been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations for condensed financial information and does not include all disclosures included in annual financial statements. The inclusion of Vistra Energy's subsidiaries as either Guarantor Subsidiaries or Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries in the condensed consolidating financial information is determined as of the most recent balance sheet date presented.

The Parent files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. All consolidated income tax expense or benefits and deferred tax assets and liabilities have been allocated to the respective subsidiary columns in accordance with the accounting rules that apply to separate financial statements of subsidiaries. In prior years, the Company had presented condensed financial information of the Parent in Schedule I under Item 15; for purposes of that schedule, consolidated income tax expense or benefits was reflected at the Parent.

Vistra Energy Corp. (Parent) received $4.668 billion, $1.505 billion and $1.0 billion in dividends from its consolidated subsidiaries in the Successor period for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016, respectively.

Condensed Statements of Consolidating Income (Loss)
for the Year Ended December 31, 2018
(Millions of Dollars)
Contents
 Parent (Issuer) Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
Operating revenues$—
 $9,043
 $174
 $(73) $9,144
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees—
 (4,968) (92) 24
 (5,036)
Operating costs—
 (1,255) (42) —
 (1,297)
Depreciation and amortization—
 (1,337) (57) —
 (1,394)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(266) (660) (49) 49
 (926)
Operating income (loss)(266) 823
 (66) —
 491
Other income9
 41
 —
 (3) 47
Other deductions—
 (6) 1
 —
 (5)
Interest expense and related charges(257) (309) (9) 3
 (572)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement(79) —
 —
 —
 (79)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment—
 17
 —
 —
 17
Income (loss) before income taxes(593) 566
 (74) —
 (101)
Income tax expense282
 (284) 47
 —
 45
Equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries, net of tax257
 (25) —
 (232) —
Net income (loss)(54) 257
 (27) (232) (56)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest—
 —
 2
 —
 2
Net income (loss) attributable to Vistra Energy$(54) $257
 $(25) $(232) $(54)



Item 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Condensed Statements of Consolidating Income (Loss)
for the Year Ended December 31, 2017
(Millions of Dollars)
 Parent (Issuer) Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
Operating revenues$—
 $5,430
 $—
 $—
 $5,430
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees—
 (2,935) —
 —
 (2,935)
Operating costs—
 (973) —
 —
 (973)
Depreciation and amortization—
 (699) —
 —
 (699)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(47) (553) —
 —
 (600)
Impairment of long-lived assets—
 (25) —
 —
 (25)
Operating income (loss)(47) 245
 —
 —
 198
Other income—
 37
 —
 —
 37
Other deductions—
 (5) —
 —
 (5)
Interest Income4
 (4) —
 —
 —
Interest expense and related charges—
 (193) —
 —
 (193)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement213
 —
 —
 —
 213
Income before income taxes170
 80
 —
 —
 250
Income tax benefit (expense)80
 (584) —
 —
 (504)
Equity in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries, net of tax(504) —
 —
 504
 —
Net income (loss)$(254) $(504) $—
 $504
 $(254)

Condensed Statements of Consolidating Income (Loss)
for the Period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016
(Millions of Dollars)
 Parent (Issuer) Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
Operating revenues$—
 $1,191
 $—
 $—
 $1,191
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees—
 (720) —
 —
 (720)
Operating costs—
 (208) —
 —
 (208)
Depreciation and amortization—
 (216) —
 —
 (216)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(7) (201) —
 —
 (208)
Operating income (loss)(7) (154) —
 —
 (161)
Other income—
 10
 —
 —
 10
Interest expense and related charges—
 (60) —
 —
 (60)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement(22) —
 —
 —
 (22)
Income (loss) before income taxes(29) (204) —
 —
 (233)
Income tax expense(204) 274
 —
 —
 70
Equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries, net of tax70
 —
 —
 (70) —
Net income (loss)(163) 70
 —
 (70) (163)


Condensed Statements of Consolidating Comprehensive Income (Loss)
for the Year Ended December 31, 2018
(Millions of Dollars)
 Parent (Issuer) Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
Net income (loss)$(54) $257
 $(27) $(232) $(56)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax effects:         
Effect related to pension and other retirement benefit obligations—
 (6) —
 —
 (6)
Adoption of accounting standard1
 —
 —
 —
 1
Total other comprehensive income1
 (6) —
 —
 (5)
Comprehensive income (loss)(53) 251
 (27) (232) (61)
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest—
 —
 2
 —
 2
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Vistra Energy$(53) $251
 $(25) $(232) $(59)

Condensed Statements of Consolidating Comprehensive Income (Loss)
for the Year Ended December 31, 2017
(Millions of Dollars)
 Parent (Issuer) Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
Net income (loss)$(254) $(504) $—
 $504
 $(254)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax effects:         
Effect related to pension and other retirement benefit obligations(23) (29) —
 29
 (23)
Total other comprehensive income(23) (29) —
 29
 (23)
Comprehensive income (loss)$(277) $(533) $—
 $533
 $(277)

Condensed Statements of Consolidating Comprehensive Income (Loss)
for the Period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016
(Millions of Dollars)
 Parent (Issuer) Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
Net income (loss)$(163) $70
 $—
 $(70) $(163)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax effects:         
Effect related to pension and other retirement benefit obligations6
 6
 —
 (6) 6
Total other comprehensive income6
 6
 —
 (6) 6
Comprehensive income (loss)(157) 76
 —
 (76) (157)


Condensed Statements of Consolidating Cash Flows
for the Year Ended December 31, 2018
(Millions of Dollars)
 Parent (Issuer) Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
Cash flows — operating activities:         
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities$(125) $1,917
 $(321) $—
 $1,471
Cash flows — financing activities:
 
 
 
  
Issuances of long-term debt—
 1,000
 —
 —
 1,000
Repayments/repurchases of debt(4,543) 1,468
 —
 —
 (3,075)
Borrowings under accounts receivable securitization program—
 —
 339
 

 339
Cash dividend paid—
 (4,668) —
 4,668
 —
Stock repurchase(763) —
 —
 —
 (763)
Debt tender offer and other financing fees(179) (57) —
 —
 (236)
Other, net12
 —
 —
 —
 12
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities(5,473) (2,257) 339
 4,668
 (2,723)
Cash flows — investing activities:         
Capital expenditures(24) (351) (3) —
 (378)
Nuclear fuel purchases—
 (118) —
 —
 (118)
Cash acquired in the Merger—
 445
 —
 —
 445
Development and growth expenditures—
 (31) (3) —
 (34)
Proceeds from sales of nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities—
 252
 —
 —
 252
Investments in nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities—
 (274) —
 —
 (274)
Dividend received from subsidiaries4,668
 

 

 (4,668) —
Other, net(1) 7
 —
 —
 6
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities4,643
 (70) (6) (4,668) (101)
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(955) (410) 12
 —
 (1,353)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — beginning balance1,183
 863
 —
 —
 2,046
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — ending balance$228
 $453
 $12
 $—
 $693


Condensed Statements of Consolidating Cash Flows
for the Year Ended December 31, 2017
(Millions of Dollars)
 Parent (Issuer) Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
Cash flows — operating activities:         
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities$(108) $1,494
 $—
 $—
 $1,386
Cash flows — financing activities:         
Repayments/repurchases of debt—
 (191) —
 —
 (191)
Cash dividend paid—
 (1,505) —
 1,505
 —
Debt financing fees—
 (8) —
 —
 (8)
Other, net—
 (2) —
 —
 (2)
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities—
 (1,706) —
 1,505
 (201)
Cash flows — investing activities:         
Capital expenditures—
 (114) —
 —
 (114)
Nuclear fuel purchases—
 (62) —
 —
 (62)
Development and growth expenditures—
 (190) —
 —
 (190)
Odessa acquisition(330) (25) —
 —
 (355)
Proceeds from sales of nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities—
 252
 —
 —
 252
Investments in nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities—
 (272) —
 —
 (272)
Dividend received from subsidiaries1,505
 

 

 (1,505) —
Other, net—
 14
 —
 —
 14
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities1,175
 (397) —
 (1,505) (727)
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash1,067
 (609) —
 —
 458
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — beginning balance116
 1,472
 —
 —
 1,588
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — ending balance$1,183
 $863
 $—
 $—
 $2,046


Condensed Statements of Consolidating Cash Flows
for the Period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016
(Millions of Dollars)
 Parent (Issuer) Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
Cash flows — operating activities:         
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities$(36) $117
 $—
 $—
 $81
Cash flows — financing activities:         
Issuances of long-term debt—
 1,000
 —
 —
 1,000
Cash dividend paid—
 (997) —
 997
 —
Special dividends(992) —
 —
 —
 (992)
Other, net1
 (3) —
 —
 (2)
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities(991) —
 —
 997
 6
Cash flows — investing activities:         
Capital expenditures—
 (48) —
 —
 (48)
Nuclear fuel purchases—
 (41) —
 —
 (41)
Proceeds from sales of nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities—
 25
 —
 —
 25
Investments in nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities—
 (30) —
 —
 (30)
Dividend received from subsidiaries997
 —
 —
 (997) —
Other, net—
 1
 —
 —
 1
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities997
 (93) —
 (997) (93)
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(30) 24
 —
 —
 (6)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — beginning balance146
 1,448
 —
 —
 1,594
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — ending balance$116
 $1,472
 $—
 $—
 $1,588


Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2018
(Millions of Dollars)
 Parent (Issuer) Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
ASSETS         
Current assets:         
Cash and cash equivalents$171
 $453
 $12
 $—
 $636
Restricted cash57
 —
 —
 —
 57
Advances to affiliates11
 11
 —
 (22) —
Trade accounts receivable — net4
 729
 464
 (110) 1,087
Accounts receivable — affiliates—
 245
 —
 (245) —
Notes due from affiliates—
 101
 —
 (101) —
Income taxes receivable—
 1
 —
 (1) —
Inventories—
 391
 21
 —
 412
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets—
 730
 —
 —
 730
Margin deposits related to commodity contracts—
 361
 —
 —
 361
Prepaid expense and other current assets2
 134
 16
 —
 152
Total current assets245
 3,156
 513
 (479) 3,435
Investments—
 1,218
 32
 —
 1,250
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiary—
 131
 —
 —
 131
Investment in affiliated companies11,186
 263
 —
 (11,449) —
Property, plant and equipment — net15
 14,017
 580
 —
 14,612
Goodwill—
 2,068
 —
 —
 2,068
Identifiable intangible assets — net10
 2,480
 3
 —
 2,493
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets—
 109
 —
 —
 109
Accumulated deferred income taxes809
 599
 —
 (72) 1,336
Other noncurrent assets255
 330
 5
 —
 590
Total assets$12,520
 $24,371
 $1,133
 $(12,000) $26,024
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY         
Current liabilities:         
Accounts receivable securitization program$—
 $—
 $339
 $—
 $339
Advances from affiliates—
 —
 22
 (22) —
Long-term debt due currently23
 163
 5
 —
 191
Trade accounts payable2
 928
 121
 (106) 945
Accounts payable — affiliates236
 —
 9
 (245) —
Notes due to affiliates—
 —
 101
 (101) —
Commodity and other derivative contractual liabilities—
 1,376
 —
 —
 1,376
Margin deposits related to commodity contracts—
 4
 —
 —
 4
Accrued taxes11
 —
 —
 (1) 10
Accrued taxes other than income—
 181
 1
 —
 182
Accrued interest48
 29
 4
 (4) 77
Asset retirement obligations—
 156
 —
 —
 156
Other current liabilities74
 267
 4
 —
 345
Total current liabilities394
 3,104
 606
 (479) 3,625

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2018
(Millions of Dollars)
 Parent (Issuer) Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
Long-term debt, less amounts due currently3,819
 7,027
 28
 —
 10,874
Commodity and other derivative contractual liabilities—
 270
 —
 —
 270
Accumulated deferred income taxes—
 —
 82
 (72) 10
Tax Receivable Agreement obligation420
 —
 —
 —
 420
Asset retirement obligations—
 2,203
 14
 —
 2,217
Identifiable intangible liabilities — net—
 278
 123
 —
 401
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits20
 303
 17
 —
 340
Total liabilities4,653
 13,185
 870
 (551) 18,157
Total stockholders' equity7,867
 11,186
 259
 (11,449) 7,863
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiary—
 —
 4
 —
 4
Total liabilities and equity$12,520
 $24,371
 $1,133
 $(12,000) $26,024


Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2017
(Millions of Dollars)
 Parent (Issuer) Guarantor Subsidiaries Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
ASSETS         
Current assets:         
Cash and cash equivalents$1,124
 $363
 $—
 $—
 $1,487
Restricted cash59
 —
 —
 —
 59
Trade accounts receivable — net4
 578
 —
 —
 582
Inventories—
 253
 —
 —
 253
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets—
 190
 —
 —
 190
Margin deposits related to commodity contracts—
 30
 —
 —
 30
Prepaid expense and other current assets—
 72
 —
 —
 72
Total current assets1,187
 1,486
 —
 —
 2,673
Restricted cash—
 500
 —
 —
 500
Investments—
 1,240
 —
 —
 1,240
Investment in affiliated companies5,632
 —
 —
 (5,632) —
Property, plant and equipment — net—
 4,820
 —
 —
 4,820
Goodwill—
 1,907
 —
 —
 1,907
Identifiable intangible assets — net—
 2,530
 —
 —
 2,530
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets—
 58
 —
 —
 58
Accumulated deferred income taxes5
 705
 —
 —
 710
Other noncurrent assets6
 156
 —
 —
 162
Total assets$6,830
 $13,402
 $—
 $(5,632) $14,600
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY         
Current liabilities:         
Long-term debt due currently—
 44
 —
 —
 44
Trade accounts payable11
 462
 —
 —
 473
Commodity and other derivative contractual liabilities—
 224
 —
 —
 224
Margin deposits related to commodity contracts—
 4
 —
 —
 4
Accrued taxes58
 —
 —
 —
 58
Accrued taxes other than income—
 136
 —
 —
 136
Accrued interest—
 16
 —
 —
 16
Asset retirement obligations—
 99
 —
 —
 99
Other current liabilities86
 211
 —
 —
 297
Total current liabilities155
 1,196
 —
 —
 1,351
Long-term debt, less amounts due currently—
 4,379
 —
 —
 4,379
Commodity and other derivative contractual liabilities—
 102
 —
 —
 102
Tax Receivable Agreement obligation333
 —
 —
 —
 333
Asset retirement obligations—
 1,837
 —
 —
 1,837
Identifiable intangible liabilities — net—
 36
 —
 —
 36
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits—
 220
 —
 —
 220
Total liabilities488
 7,770
 —
 —
 8,258
Total equity6,342
 5,632
 —
 (5,632) 6,342
Total liabilities and equity$6,830
 $13,402
 $—
 $(5,632) $14,600


Item 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE


None.




Item 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) in effect at December 31, 2018.2020. Based on the evaluation performed, our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective.effective as of that date.


Other than the changes resulting from the Merger, thereThere have been no changechanges in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



VISTRA ENERGY CORP.
MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING


The management of Vistra Energy Corp. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the company. Vistra Energy Corp.'s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in condition or the deterioration of compliance with procedures or policies.


The management of Vistra Energy Corp. performed an evaluation as of December 31, 2018 of the effectiveness of the company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020 based on the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission’sCommission's (COSO's) Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013). Based on the review performed, management believes that as of December 31, 20182020 Vistra Energy Corp.'s internal control over financial reporting was effective.


The independent registered public accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP as auditors of the consolidated financial statements of Vistra Energy Corp. has issued an attestation report on Vistra Energy Corp.’s's internal control over financial reporting.


/s/ CURTIS A. MORGAN/s/ JAMES A. BURKE
Curtis A. MorganJames A. Burke
Curtis A. Morgan
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ J. William Holden
J. William Holden
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)(Principal Financial Officer)


February 28, 201926, 2021






173
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the shareholdersstockholders and the Board of Directors of Vistra Energy Corp.


Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting


We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Vistra Energy Corp. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2018,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control -— Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.


We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, of the Company and our report dated February 28, 2019,26, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.


Basis for Opinion


The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting


A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


Dallas, TXTexas
February 28, 201926, 2021




Item 9B.OTHER INFORMATION


None.





174
Table of Contents
PART III


Item 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Code of Ethics


Vistra Energy has adopted a code of ethics entitled "Vistra Energy Code of Conduct" that applies to directors, officers and employees, including the chief executive officer and senior financial officers of Vistra Energy.Vistra. It may be accessed through the "Corporate Governance" section of the Company's website at www.vistraenergy.comwww.vistracorp.com. Vistra Energy also elects to disclose the information required by Form 8-K, Item 5.05, "Amendments to the Registrant's Code of Ethics, or Waiver of a Provision of the Code of Ethics," through the Company's website and will disclose such events within four business days following the date of the amendment or waiver, and such information will remain available on this website for at least a 12-month period. A copy of the "Vistra Energy Code of Conduct" is available in print to any stockholder who requests it.


Other information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the similarly named section of Vistra Energy's Definitive Proxy Statement for its 20192021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.




Item 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Item 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the similarly named section of Vistra Energy'sVistra's Definitive Proxy Statement for its 20192021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.




Item 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Item 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled "Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock of the Company" in Vistra Energy'sVistra's Definitive Proxy Statement for its 20192021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.




Item 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Item 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled "Business Relationships and Related Person Transactions Policy" and "Director Independence" in Vistra Energy'sVistra's Definitive Proxy Statement for its 20192021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.




Item 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES

Item 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled "Principal Accounting Fees" in Vistra Energy'sVistra's Definitive Proxy Statement for its 20192021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.





175
Table of Contents
PART IV


Item 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES


Item 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)    Our financial statements and financial statement schedules are incorporated under Part II, Item 8 of this annual report on Form 10-K.

(b)    SCHEDULE I - CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT

VISTRA CORP. (PARENT)
SCHEDULE I - CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Millions of Dollars)
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Depreciation and amortization$(15)$(7)$0 
Selling, general and administrative expenses(72)(62)(266)
Operating loss(87)(69)(266)
Other income5 12 9 
Interest expense and related charges(7)(88)(257)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement5 (37)(79)
Loss before income tax benefit(84)(182)(593)
Income tax benefit25 42 282 
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries, net of tax695 1,068 257 
Net income (loss)$636 $928 $(54)

See Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements.

VISTRA CORP. (PARENT)
SCHEDULE I - CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Millions of Dollars)
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Cash flows — operating activities:
Cash used in operating activities$(86)$(58)$(125)
Cash flows — investing activities:
Capital expenditures(15)(36)(24)
Dividend received from subsidiaries1,105 3,890 4,668 
Other, net0 0 (1)
Cash provided by investing activities1,090 3,854 4,643 
Cash flows — financing activities:
Repayments/repurchases of debt(747)(2,903)(4,543)
Debt tender offer and other debt financing fees(17)(123)(179)
Stock repurchases0 (656)(763)
Dividends paid to stockholders(266)(243)0 
Other, net0 0 12 
Cash used in financing activities(1,030)(3,925)(5,473)
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(26)(129)(955)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — beginning balance99 228 1,183 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — ending balance$73 $99 $228 

176
Table of Contents
(a)Our financial statements and financial statement schedules are incorporated under Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

See Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements.
(b)EXHIBITS:


VISTRA CORP. (PARENT)
SCHEDULE I - CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Millions of Dollars)
December 31,
20202019
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents$73 $56 
Restricted cash0 43 
Trade accounts receivable — net7 5 
Prepaid expense and other current assets5 100 
Total current assets85 204 
Investment in affiliated companies8,005 8,364 
Property, plant and equipment — net3 4 
Identifiable intangible assets — net47 49 
Accumulated deferred income taxes783 729 
Other noncurrent assets2 67 
Total assets$8,925 $9,417 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Long-term debt due currently$0 $87 
Trade accounts payable2 1 
Accounts payable —affiliates74 145 
Accrued taxes14 1 
Accrued interest0 11 
Other current liabilities4 46 
Total current liabilities94 291 
Long-term debt, less amounts due currently0 689 
Tax Receivable Agreement obligations447 455 
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred debits23 22 
Total liabilities564 1,457 
Total stockholders' equity8,361 7,960 
Total liabilities and equity$8,925 $9,417 

See Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unconsolidated condensed balance sheets, statements of net loss and cash flows present results of operations and cash flows of Vistra Corp. (Parent). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been omitted pursuant to the rules of the SEC. Because the unconsolidated condensed financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP, they should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes of Vistra Corp. and Subsidiaries included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. Vistra Corp.'s subsidiaries have been accounted for under the equity method. All dollar amounts in the financial statements and tables in the notes are stated in millions of U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated.

Vistra EnergyCorp. (Parent) files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. Consolidated tax expenses or benefits and deferred tax assets or liabilities have been allocated to the respective subsidiaries in accordance with the accounting rules that apply to separate financial statements of subsidiaries.

177
Table of Contents
2.RESTRICTIONS ON SUBSIDIARIES

The Credit Facilities Agreement generally restricts the ability of Vistra Operations to make distributions to any direct or indirect parent unless such distributions are expressly permitted thereunder. As of December 31, 2020, Vistra Operations can distribute approximately $6.7 billion to Vistra Corp. (Parent) under the Credit Facilities Agreement without the consent of any party. The amount that can be distributed by Vistra Operations to Parent was partially reduced by distributions made by Vistra Operations to Vistra Corp. (Parent) of approximately $1.1 billion, $3.9 billion and $4.7 billion during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Additionally, Vistra Operations may make distributions to Vistra Corp. (Parent) in amounts sufficient for Vistra Corp. (Parent) to make any payments required under the TRA or the Tax Matters Agreement or, to the extent arising out of Vistra Corp. (Parent)'s ownership or operation of Vistra Operations, to pay any taxes or general operating or corporate overhead expenses. As of December 31, 2020, the maximum amount of restricted net assets of Vistra Operations that may not be distributed to Vistra Corp. (Parent) totaled approximately $1.2 billion.

3.GUARANTEES

Vistra Corp. (Parent) has entered into contracts that contain guarantees to unaffiliated parties that could require performance or payment under certain conditions. As of December 31, 2020, there are no material outstanding claims related to guarantee obligations of Vistra Corp. (Parent), and Vistra Corp. (Parent) does not anticipate it will be required to make any material payments under these guarantees in the near term.

4.DIVIDEND RESTRICTIONS

Under applicable law, Vistra Corp. (Parent) is prohibited from paying any dividend to the extent that immediately following payment of such dividend there would be no statutory surplus or Vistra Corp. (Parent) would be insolvent.

Vistra Corp. (Parent) received $1.105 billion, $3.890 billion and $4.668 billion in dividends from its consolidated subsidiaries in the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

(c)    EXHIBITS:

Vistra Corp. Exhibits to Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20182020
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
(2)Plan of Acquisition, Reorganization, Arrangement, Liquidation, or Succession
2.1
333-215288
Form S-1
(filed December 23, 2016)
2.1—
Order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Confirming the Third Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization
2.2
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed October 31, 2017)
2.1—
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 29, 2017, by and between Vistra Energy Corp. (now known as Vistra Corp.) and Dynegy, Inc.
(3(i))Articles of Incorporation
3.1
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed May 4, 2020)
3.1
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Vistra Energy Corp. (now known as Vistra Corp.)
3.2
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed June 29, 2020)
3.1—
Certificate of Amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Vistra Energy Corp. (now known as Vistra Corp.), effective July 2, 2020
(3(ii))By-laws
3.3**—
Restated Bylaws of Vistra Corp., effective February 23, 2020
178
Table of Contents
Exhibits Previously Filed With File Number* 
As
Exhibit
 ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
 
(2) Plan of Acquisition, Reorganization, Arrangement, Liquidation, or Succession
 
2.1 
333-215288
Form S-1
(filed December 23, 2016)
 2.1 — 
Order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Confirming the Third Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization
 
2.2 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed October 31, 2017)
 2.1 — 
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 29, 2017, by and between Vistra Energy Corp. and Dynegy, Inc.
 
(3(i)) Articles of Incorporation
 
3.1 
333-215288
Form S-1
(filed December 23, 2016)
 3.1 
Certification of Incorporation of TCEH Corp. (now known as Vistra Energy Corp.), dated October 3, 2016
 
3.2 
333-215288
Form S-1
(filed December 23, 2016)
 3.2 — 
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of TCEH Corp. (now known as Vistra Energy Corp.), dated November 2, 2016
 
(3(ii)) By-laws
 
3.3 
333-215288
Form S-1
(filed December 23, 2016)
 3.3 — 
Restated Bylaws of Vistra Energy Corp., dated November 4, 2016
 
(4) Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures(4)Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures
 
4.1 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on October 30, 2014)
 4.8 — 
2022 Notes Indenture, dated October 27, 2014, among Dynegy Finance II, Inc. and the Trustee
4.1001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)		4.1—
Indenture for 5.500% Senior Note due 2026, dated as of August 22, 2018, among Vistra Operations Company LLC, as issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors (as defined therein), and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee
 
4.2 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on April7, 2015)
 4.11 — 
First Supplemental Indenture to the 2022 Notes Indenture, dated April 1, 2015, between Dynegy and the Trustee
4.2001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)		4.2—
Form of Rule 144A Global Security for 5.500% Senior Note due 2026 (included in Exhibit 4.1)
 
4.3 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on April 7, 2015)
 4.12 — 
Second Supplemental Indenture to the 2022 Notes Indenture, dated April 1, 2015, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.3001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)		4.3—
Form of Regulation S Global Security for 5.500% Senior Note due 2026 (included in Exhibit 4.1)
 
4.4 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on April 8, 2015)
 4.17 — 
Third Supplemental Indenture to the 2022 Notes Indenture, dated April 2, 2015, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.4001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2019) (filed on November 5, 2019)		4.5—
First Supplemental Indenture for the 5.500% Senior Notes due 2026, dated August 30, 2019, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.5 
001-33443
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2015)
(filed on August 7, 2015)
 4.2 — 
Fourth Supplemental Indenture to the 2022 Notes Indenture, dated May 11, 2015, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.5001-38086
Form 10-K (filed
on February 28, 2020)		4.36—
Second Supplemental Indenture for the 5.500% Senior Notes due 2026, dated October 25, 2019, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.6 
001-33443
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2015) (filed on November 5, 2015)
 4.2 — 
Fifth Supplemental Indenture to the 2022 Notes Indenture, dated September 21, 2015, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.6001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)		4.5—
Third Supplemental Indenture for the 5.500% Senior Notes due 2026, dated January 31, 2020, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.74.7001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)		4.6—
Fourth Supplemental Indenture for the 5.500% Senior Notes due 2026, dated March 26, 2020, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.84.8**—
Fifth Supplemental Indenture for the 5.500% Senior Notes due 2026, dated October 7, 2020, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.94.9**—
Sixth Supplemental Indenture for the 5.500% Senior Notes due 2026, dated January 8, 2021, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.104.10001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on February 6, 2019)		4.1—
Indenture for 5.625% Senior Note due 2027, dated as of February 6, 2019, among Vistra Operations Company LLC, as issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors (as defined therein), and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee

4.114.11001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on February 6, 2019)		4.2—
Form of Rule 144A Global Security for 5.625% Senior Note due 2027 (included in Exhibit 4.1)

4.124.12001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on February 6, 2019)		4.3—
Form of Regulation S Global Security for 5.625% Senior Note due 2027 (included in Exhibit 4.1)

4.134.13001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2019) (filed on November 5, 2019)		4.6—
First Supplemental Indenture for the 5.625% Senior Notes due 2027, dated August 30, 2019, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.144.14001-38086
Form 10-K (filed
on February 28, 2020)		4.41—
Second Supplemental Indenture for the 5.625% Senior Notes due 2027, dated October 25, 2019, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
179
Table of Contents
Exhibits Previously Filed With File Number* 
As
Exhibit
 ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
4.7 
001-33443
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2016) (filed on February 24, 2017)
 4.24 — 
Sixth Supplemental Indenture to the 2022 Notes Indenture, dated February 2, 2017, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.8 
001-33443
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2016) (filed on February 24, 2017)
 4.25 — 
Seventh Supplemental Indenture to the 2022 Notes Indenture, dated February 7, 2017, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.9 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
 4.19 — 
Eighth Supplemental Indenture to the 2022 Notes Indenture, dated April 9, 2018, among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.10 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 15, 2018)
 4.1 — 
Ninth Supplemental Indenture to the 2022 Notes Indenture, dated June 14, 2018, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.11 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on February 9, 2019)
 4.4 — 
Tenth Supplemental Indenture to the 2022 Notes Indenture, dated February 6, 2019, by and among the Company and the Trustee.
 
4.12 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on October 30, 2014)
 4.8 — 
Form of 7.375% Senior Note due 2022
 
4.13 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on May 21, 2013)
 4.1 — 
2023 Notes Indenture, dated May 20, 2013, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.14 
001-33443
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2013) (filed on February 27, 2014)
 4.3 — 
First Supplemental Indenture to the 2023 Notes Indenture, dated as of December 5, 2014, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.15 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on April 7, 2015)
 4.20 — 
Second Supplemental Indenture to the 2023 Notes Indenture, dated April 1, 2015, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.15001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)		4.7—
Third Supplemental Indenture for the 5.625% Senior Notes due 2027, dated January 31, 2020, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.16 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on April 8, 2015)
 4.28 — 
Third Supplemental Indenture to the 2023 Notes Indenture, dated April 2, 2015, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.16001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)		4.8—
Fourth Supplemental Indenture for the 5.625% Senior Notes due 2027, dated March 26, 2020, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.17 
001-33443
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2015)
(filed on August 7, 2015)
 4.4 — 
Fourth Supplemental Indenture to the 2023 Notes Indenture, dated May 11, 2015, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors
4.17**—
Fifth Supplemental Indenture for the 5.625% Senior Notes due 2027, dated October 7, 2020, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.18 
001-33443
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2015) (filed on November 5, 2015)
 4.4 — 
Fifth Supplemental Indenture to the 2023 Notes Indenture, dated September 21, 2015, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.18**
Sixth Supplemental Indenture for the 5.625% Senior Notes due 2027, dated January 8, 2021, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.19 
001-33443
Form10-K (Year ended December 31, 2016) (filed on February 24, 2017)
 4.7 — 
Sixth Supplemental Indenture to the 2023 Notes Indenture, dated February 2, 2017, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.19001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 24, 2019)		4.1—
Indenture for 5.00% Senior Notes due 2027, dated as of June 21, 2019, among Vistra Operations Company LLC, as Issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors (as defined therein), and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee
 
4.20 
001-33443
Form10-K (Year ended December 31, 2016) (filed on February 24, 2017)
 4.8 — 
Seventh Supplemental Indenture to the 2023 Notes Indenture, dated February 7, 2017, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.20001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 24, 2019)		4.2—
Form of Rule 144A Global Security for 5.00% Senior Notes due 2027 (included in Exhibit 4.1)
 
4.21 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
 4.29 — 
Eighth Supplemental Indenture to the 2023 Notes Indenture, dated April 9, 2018, among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.21001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 24, 2019)		4.3—
Form of Regulation S Global Security for 5.00% Senior Notes due 2027 (included in Exhibit 4.1)
 
4.224.22001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2019) (filed on November 5, 2019)		4.7—
First Supplemental Indenture for the 5.000% Senior Notes due 2027, dated August 30, 2019, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.234.23001-38086
Form 10-K (filed
on February 28, 2020)		4.46—
Second Supplemental Indenture for the 5.000% Senior Notes due 2027, dated October 25, 2019, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.244.24001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)		4.9—
Third Supplemental Indenture for the 5.000% Senior Notes due 2027, dated January 31, 2020, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.254.25001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)		4.10—
Fourth Supplemental Indenture for the 5.000% Senior Notes due 2027, dated March 26, 2020, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.264.26**—
Fifth Supplemental Indenture for the 5.000% Senior Notes due 2027, dated October 7, 2020, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.274.27**—
Sixth Supplemental Indenture for the 5.000% Senior Notes due 2027, dated January 8, 2021, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.284.28001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 17, 2019)		4.1—
Indenture, dated as of June 11, 2019, between Vistra Operations Company LLC, as Issuer, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee
4.294.29001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 17, 2019)		4.2—
Supplemental Indenture for 3.55% Senior Secured Notes due 2024 and 4.30% Senior Secured Notes Due 2029, dated as of June 11, 2019, among Vistra Operations Company LLC, as Issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors (as defined therein), and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee
180
Table of Contents
Exhibits Previously Filed With File Number* 
As
Exhibit
 ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
4.22 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 15, 2018)
 4.2 — 
Ninth Supplemental Indenture to the 2023 Notes Indenture, dated June 14, 2018, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.23 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on May 21, 2013)
 4.1 — 
Form of 5.875% Senior Note due 2023
 
4.24 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on October 30, 2014)
 4.9 — 
2024 7.625% Notes Indenture, dated October 27, 2014, among Dynegy Finance II, Inc. and the Trustee
 
4.25 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on April 7, 2015)
 4.14 — 
First Supplemental Indenture to the 2024 7.625% Notes Indenture, dated April 1, 2015, between Dynegy and the Trustee
 
4.26 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on April 7, 2015)
 4.15 — 
Second Supplemental Indenture to the 2024 7.625% Notes Indenture, dated April 1, 2015, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.27 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on April 8, 2015)
 4.21 — 
Third Supplemental Indenture to the 2024 7.625% Notes Indenture, dated April 2, 2015, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.28 
001-33443
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2015)
(filed on August 7, 2015)
 4.3 — 
Fourth Supplemental Indenture to the 2024 7.625% Notes Indenture, dated May 11, 2015, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.29 
001-33443
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2015) (filed on November 5, 2015)
 4.3 — 
Fifth Supplemental Indenture to the 2024 7.625% Notes Indenture, dated September 21, 2015, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.30 
001-33443
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2016) (filed on February 24, 2017)
 4.32 — 
Sixth Supplemental Indenture to the 2024 7.625% Notes Indenture, dated February 2, 2017, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.30001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 17, 2019)		4.3—
Form of Rule 144A Global Security for 3.55% Senior Notes due 2024 (included in Exhibit 4.2)
 
4.31 
001-33443
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2016) (filed on February 24, 2017)
 4.33 — 
Seventh Supplemental Indenture to the 2024 7.625% Notes Indenture, dated February 7, 2017, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.31001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 17, 2019)		4.4—
Form of Rule 144A Global Security for 4.30% Senior Notes due 2029 (included in Exhibit 4.2)
 
4.32 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
 4.39 — 
Eighth Supplemental Indenture to the 2024 7.625% Notes Indenture, dated April 9, 2018, among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.32001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 17, 2019)		4.5—
Form of Regulation S Global Security for 3.55% Senior Notes due 2024 (included in Exhibit 4.2)
 
4.33 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 15, 2018)
 4.3 — 
Ninth Supplemental Indenture to the 2024 7.625% Notes Indenture, dated June 14, 2018, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.33001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 17, 2019)		4.6—
Form of Regulation S Global Security for 4.30% Senior Notes due 2029 (included in Exhibit 4.2)
 
4.34 
001-33443
Form of 8-K
(filed on October 30, 2014)
 4.9 — 
Form of 7.625% Senior Note due 2024
4.34001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2019) (filed on November 5, 2019)		4.8—
Second Supplemental Indenture for 3.55% Senior Secured Notes due 2024 and 4.30% Senior Secured Notes due 2029, dated as of August 30, 2019, among Vistra Operations Company LLC, as Issuer, the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.35 
001-33443 Form 8-K
(filed on October 11, 2016)
 4.1 — 
2025 Notes Indenture, dated October 11, 2016, between Dynegy and the Trustee
4.35001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on November 21, 2019)		4.1—
Third Supplemental Indenture for 3.55% Senior Secured Notes due 2024 and 4.30% Senior Secured Notes due 2029, dated as of October 25, 2019, among Vistra Operations Company LLC, as Issuer, the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.36 
001-33443
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2016) (filed on February 24, 2017)
 4.35 — 
First Supplemental Indenture to the 2025 Notes Indenture, dated February 2, 2017, between Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.36001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on November 21, 2019)		4.2—
Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 15, 2019, among Vistra Operations Company LLC, as Issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors (as defined therein), and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee
 
4.37 
001-33443
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2016) (filed on February 24, 2017)
 4.36 — 
Second Supplemental Indenture to the 2025 Notes Indenture, dated February 7, 2017, between Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.37001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on November 21, 2019)		4.3—
Form of Rule 144A Global Security for 3.70% Senior Note due 2027 (included in Exhibit 4.2)
 
4.384.38001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on November 21, 2019)		4.4—
Form of Regulation S Global Security for 3.70% Senior Note due 2027 (included in Exhibit 4.2)
4.394.39001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)		4.11—
Fifth Supplemental Indenture for 3.55% Senior Secured Notes due 2024, 3.70% Senior Secured Notes due 2027 and 4.30% Senior Secured Notes due 2029, dated as of January 31, 2020, among Vistra Operations Company LLC, as Issuer, the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.404.40001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)		4.12—
Sixth Supplemental Indenture for 3.55% Senior Secured Notes due 2024, 3.70% Senior Secured Notes due 2027 and 4.30% Senior Secured Notes due 2029, dated as of March 26, 2020, among Vistra Operations Company LLC, as Issuer, the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.414.41**—
Seventh Supplemental Indenture for 3.55% Senior Secured Notes due 2024, 3.70% Senior Secured Notes due 2027 and 4.30% Senior Secured Notes due 2029, dated as of October 7, 2020, among Vistra Operations Company LLC, as Issuer, the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.424.42**—
Eighth Supplemental Indenture for 3.55% Senior Secured Notes due 2024, 3.70% Senior Secured Notes due 2027 and 4.30% Senior Secured Notes due 2029, dated as of January 8, 2021, among Vistra Operations Company LLC, as Issuer, the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.434.43001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)		4.7—
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of August 21, 2018, between TXU Energy Retail Company LLC as originator, and TXU Energy Receivables Company LLC, as purchaser
181
Table of Contents
Exhibits Previously Filed With File Number* 
As
Exhibit
 ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
4.38 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
 4.48 — 
Third Supplemental Indenture to the 2025 Notes Indenture, dated April 9, 2018, among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.39 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 15, 2018)
 4.5 — 
Fourth Supplemental Indenture to the 2025 Notes Indenture, dated June 14, 2018, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.40 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)
 4.6 — 
Fifth Supplemental Indenture to the 2025 Notes Indenture, dated August 22, 2018, by and among the Company and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee
 
4.41 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on October 11, 2016)
 4.1 — 
Form of 8.000% Senior Note due 2025
 
4.42 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on August 21, 2017)
 4.1 — 
2026 Notes Indenture, dated August 21, 2017, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.43 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on August 21, 2017)
 4.2 — 
Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 21, 2017, among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
 
4.44 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
 4.52 — 
First Supplemental Indenture to the 2026 Notes Indenture, dated April 9, 2018, among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.44001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)		4.8—
Receivable Purchase Agreement dated as of August 21, 2018, among TXU Energy Receivables Company LLC, as seller, TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, as servicer, Vistra Operations Company LLC, as performance guarantor, certain purchaser agents and purchasers named therein and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as administrator
 
4.45 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 15, 2018)
 4.6 — 
Second Supplemental Indenture to the 2026 Notes Indenture, dated June 14, 2018, among the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the Trustee
4.45001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 5, 2019)		4.1—
First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2019, among TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, Dynegy Energy Services, LLC, and Dynegy Energy Services (East), LLC, each as an originator, and TXU Energy Receivables Company LLC, as purchaser
 
4.46 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)
 4.4 — 
Third Supplemental Indenture to the 2026 Notes Indenture, dated August 22, 2018, by and among the Company and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee
4.46001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2019) (filed on August 2, 2019)		4.12—
Second Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of June 3, 2019, among TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, Dynegy Energy Services, LLC, and Dynegy Energy Services (East), LLC, each as an originator, and TXU Energy Receivables Company LLC, as purchaser
 
4.47 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on August 21, 2017)
 4.1 — 
Form of 8.125% Senior Note due 2026
4.47001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on July 19, 2019)		4.1—
Third Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2019, among TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, Dynegy Energy Services, LLC, and Dynegy Energy Services (East), LLC, each as an originator, and TXU Energy Receivables Company LLC, as purchaser
 
4.48 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)
 4.1 — 
Indenture for 5.500% Senior Note due 2026, dated as of August 22, 2018, among Vistra Operations Company LLC, as issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors (as defined therein), and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee
4.48001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on October 16, 2020)		4.1—
Fourth Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of October 9, 2020, among TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, as an originator and servicer, the other originators named therein, and TXU Energy Receivables Company LLC, as purchaser
 
4.49 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)
 4.2 — 
Form of Rule 144A Global Security for 5.500% Senior Note due 2026 (included in Exhibit 4.1)
4.49001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on December 28, 2020)		4.1—
Fifth Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2020, among TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, certain originators named therein, and TXU Energy Receivables Company LLC, as purchaser
 
4.50 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)
 4.3 — 
Form of Regulation S Global Security for 5.500% Senior Note due 2026 (included in Exhibit 4.1)
4.50001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 5, 2019)		4.2—
First Amendment to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2019, among TXU Energy Receivables Company LLC, as seller, TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, as servicer, Vistra Operations Company LLC, as performance guarantor, certain purchaser agents and purchasers named therein and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as administrator
 
4.51 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on February 6, 2019)
 4.1 — 
Indenture for 5.675% Senior Note due 2027, dated as of February 6, 2019, among Vistra Operations Company LLC, as issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors (as defined therein), and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee

4.51001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2019) (filed on August 2, 2019)		4.13—
Second Amendment to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 3, 2019, among TXU Energy Receivables Company LLC, as seller, TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, as servicer, Vistra Operations Company LLC, as performance guarantor, certain purchaser agents and purchasers named therein and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as administrator
 
4.52 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on February 6, 2019)
 4.2 — 
Form of Rule 144A Global Security for 5.675% Senior Note due2027 (included in Exhibit 4.1)

4.52001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on July 19, 2019)		4.2—
Third Amendment to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2019, among TXU Energy Receivables Company LLC, as seller, TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, as servicer, Vistra Operations Company LLC, as performance guarantor, certain purchaser agents and purchasers named therein and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as administrator
 
4.53 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on February 6, 2019)
 4.3 — 
Form of Regulation S Global Security for 5.675% Senior Note due 2027 (included in Exhibit 4.1)

4.53001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on July 16, 2020)		4.1—
Fifth Amendment to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 13, 2020, among TXU Energy Receivables Company LLC, as seller, TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, as servicer, Vistra Operations Company LLC, as performance guarantor, certain purchaser agents and purchasers named therein and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as administrator
 
182
Table of Contents
Exhibits Previously Filed With File Number* 
As
Exhibit
 ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
4.54 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)
 4.7 — 
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of August 21, 2018, between TXU Energy Retail Company LLC as originator, and TXU Energy Receivables Company LLC, as purchaser
4.54001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on October 16, 2020)		4.2—
Sixth Amendment to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 9, 2020, among TXU Energy Receivables Company LLC, as seller, TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, as servicer, Vistra Operations Company LLC, as performance guarantor, certain purchaser agents and purchasers named therein, and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as administrator
 
4.55 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)
 4.8 — 
Receivable Purchase Agreement dated as of August 21, 2018, among TXU Energy Receivables Company LLC, as seller, TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, as servicer, Vistra Operations Company LLC, as performance guarantor, certain purchaser agents and purchasers named therein and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as administrator
4.55001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on December 28, 2020)		4.2—
Seventh Amendment to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2020, among TXU Energy Receivables Company LLC, as seller, TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, as servicer, Vistra Operations Company LLC, as performance guarantor, certain purchaser agents and purchasers named therein, and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as administrator
 
4.56 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on June 21, 2016)
 4.3 — 
Purchase Contract Agreement, dated June 21, 2016, between Dynegy and the Trustee
4.56**—
Eighth Amendment to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 19, 2020, among TXU Energy Receivables Company LLC, as seller, TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, as servicer, Vistra Operations Company LLC, as performance guarantor, certain purchaser agents and purchasers named therein, and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as administrator
 
4.57 
001-38086
Registration Statement on Form 8-A
(filed on April 9, 2018)
 4.5 — 
First Supplement to the Purchase Contract Agreement, dated April 9, 2018, between the Company, the Purchase Contract Agent and the Trustee
4.57001-33443
Form of 8-K
(filed on February 7, 2017)		4.1—
Warrant Agreement, dated February 2, 2017, by and among Dynegy, Computershare Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as warrant agent
 
4.58 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on June 21, 2016)
 4.3 — 
Form of Unit
4.58001-38086
Registration Statement on Form 8-A
(filed on April 9, 2018)		4.2—
Supplemental Warrant Agreement, dated as of April 9, 2018 among the Company and the Warrant Agent
 
4.59 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on June 21, 2016)
 4.3 — 
Form of Purchase Contract
4.59001-33443
Form of 8-K
(filed on February 7, 2017)		4.1—
Form of Warrant
 
4.60 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on June 21, 2016)
 4.1 — 
Amortizing Notes Indenture, dated June 21, 2016, between Dynegy and the Trustee
4.60
333-215288
Form S-1
(filed December 23, 2016)
4.1—
Registration Rights Agreement, by and among TCEH Corp. (now known as Vistra Corp.) and the Holders party thereto, dated as of October 3, 2016
 
4.61 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on June 21, 2016)
 4.2 — 
First Supplemental Indenture to the Amortizing Notes Indenture, dated June 21, 2016, between Dynegy and the Trustee
4.61**—
Description of Capital Stock
 
4.62 
001-38086
Registration Statement on Form 8-A
(filed on April 9, 2018)
 4.3 — 
Second Supplemental Indenture to the Amortizing Notes Indenture, dated April 9, 2018, between the Company and the Trustee
 
4.63 
001-33443
Form 8-K
(filed on June 21, 2016)
 4.2 — 
Form of Amortizing Note
 
4.64 
001-33443
Form of 8-K
(filed on February 7, 2017)
 4.1 — 
Warrant Agreement, dated February 2, 2017, by and among Dynegy, Computershare Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as warrant agent
 
4.65 
001-38086
Registration Statement on Form 8-A
(filed on April 9, 2018)
 4.2 — 
Supplemental Warrant Agreement, dated as of April 9, 2018 among the Company and the Warrant Agent
 
4.66 
001-33443
Form of 8-K
(filed on February 7, 2017)
 4.1 — 
Form of Warrant
 
4.67 
333-215288
Form S-1
(filed December 23, 2016)
 4.1 — 
Registration Rights Agreement, by and among TCEH Corp. (now known as Vistra Energy Corp.) and the Holders party thereto, dated as of October 3, 2016
(10) Material Contracts(10)Material Contracts
 
 Management Contracts; Compensatory Plans, Contracts and ArrangementsManagement Contracts; Compensatory Plans, Contracts and Arrangements
 
10.110.1
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.6—
2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan
10.210.2
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.7—
Form of Option Award Agreement (Management) for 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (pre-2021 awards)
10.310.3
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.8—
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Management) for 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (pre-2021 awards)
10.410.4001-33443
Form10-K (Year ended December 31, 2017) (filed on February 26, 2018)		10(d)—
Form of Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement for 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (pre-2021 awards)
10.510.5**—
Form of Option Award Agreement (Management) for 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan
183
Table of Contents
Exhibits Previously Filed With File Number* 
As
Exhibit
 ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
10.1 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.6 — 
2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan
 
10.2 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.7 — 
Form of Option Award Agreement (Management) for 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan
 
10.3 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.8 — 
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Management) for 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan
 
10.4 
001-33443
Form10-K (Year ended December 31, 2017) (filed on February 26, 2018)
 10(d) — 
Form of Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement for 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan
 
10.5 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.9 — 
Vistra Energy Corp. Executive Annual Incentive Plan
 
10.6 ** — — 
Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, effective as of February 26, 2019
10.6**—
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Management) for 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan
 
10.7 ** — — 
Vistra Energy Equity Deferred Compensation Plan for Certain Directors
10.7**—
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Director) for 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan
 
10.8 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.10 — 
Stockholder's Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2016, by and between TCEH Corp. (now known as Vistra Energy Corp.) and Apollo Management Holdings, L.P.
10.8**—
Form of Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement for 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan
 
10.9 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.11 — 
Stockholder's Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2016, by and between TCEH Corp. (now known as Vistra Energy Corp.) and Brookfield Asset Management Private Institutional Capital Adviser (Canada)
10.9
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.9—
Vistra Corp. Executive Annual Incentive Plan
 
10.10 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.12 — 
Stockholder's Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2016, by and between TCEH Corp. (now known as Vistra Energy Corp.) and Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. and certain of its affiliated entities
10.10001-33443
Form10-K (Year ended December 31, 2018) (filed on February 28, 2019)		10.6—
Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, effective as of February 26, 2019
 
10.11 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed April 27, 2018)
 10.1 — 
Termination of Stockholder’s Agreement, dated as of April 24,2018, by and among the Company and the Oaktree Stockholder
10.11001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on May 23, 2019)		10.1—
Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, effective as of May 20, 2019
 
10.12 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.19 — 
Employment Agreement between Curtis A. Morgan and Vistra Energy Corp.
10.12001-33443
Form10-K (Year ended December 31, 2018) (filed on February 28, 2019)		10.7—
Vistra Equity Deferred Compensation Plan for Certain Directors, effective as of January 1, 2019
 
10.13 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed May 4, 2018)
 10.1 — 
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of May 1,2018, between Curtis A. Morgan and Vistra Energy Corp.

10.13**—
Amendment No. 1 to the Vistra Equity Deferred Compensation Plan, dated effective as of February 24, 2021
 
10.14 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.20 — 
Employment Agreement between James A. Burke and Vistra Energy Corp.
10.14
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed May 4, 2018)
10.1—
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2018, between Curtis A. Morgan and Vistra Energy Corp. (now known as Vistra Corp.)

 
10.1510.15001-33443
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2019) (filed on May 3, 2019)		10.5—
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 2019, between James A. Burke and Vistra Energy Corp. (now known as Vistra Corp.)
10.1610.16
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.22—
Employment Agreement between Stephanie Zapata Moore and Vistra Energy Corp. (now known as Vistra Corp.)
10.1710.17
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.23—
Employment Agreement between Carrie Lee Kirby and Vistra Energy Corp. (now known as Vistra Corp.)
10.1810.18
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed February 27, 2020)
10.2—
Employment Agreement between Scott A. Hudson, Vistra Energy Corp. (now known as Vistra Corp.) and TXU Retail Service Company
10.1910.19
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed February 27, 2020)
10.1—
Employment Agreement between Stephen J. Muscato, Vistra Energy Corp. (now known as Vistra Corp.) and Luminant Energy Company LLC
10.2010.20
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.26—
Form of indemnification agreement with directors
184
Table of Contents
ExhibitsExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
10.2110.21
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.29—
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2016, by and between TCEH Corp. (now known as Vistra Corp.) and Curtis A. Morgan
Credit Agreements and Related Agreements
Exhibits Previously Filed With File Number* 
As
Exhibit
 
10.15 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.21 — 
Employment Agreement between William Holden and Vistra Energy Corp.
 
10.16 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.22 — 
Employment Agreement between Stephanie Zapata Moore and Vistra Energy Corp.
 
10.17 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.23 — 
Employment Agreement between Carrie Lee Kirby and Vistra Energy Corp.
 
10.18 ** — 
Agreement between Scott A. Hudson, Vistra Energy Corp. and TXU Retail Service Company
 
10.19 ** — 
Agreement between Stephen J. Muscato, Vistra Energy Corp. and Luminant Energy Company LLC
 
10.20 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.24 — 
Employment Agreement between Sara Graziano and Vistra Energy Corp.
 
10.21 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.26 — 
Form of indemnification agreement with directors
 
10.22 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.29 — 
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2016, by and between TCEH Corp. (now known as Vistra Energy Corp.) and Curtis A. Morgan
10.22
333-215288
Form S-1
(filed December 23, 2016)
10.1—
 
 Credit Agreements and Related Agreements
 
10.23 
333-215288
Form S-1
(filed December 23, 2016)
 10.1 — 
Credit Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2017
10.23
333-215288
Form S-1
(filed December 23, 2016)
10.2—
Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated December 14, 2016, by and among Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Vistra Operations Company LLC, Vistra Intermediate Company LLC and the other Credit Parties and Lenders party thereto.
 
10.24 
333-215288
Form S-1
(filed December 23, 2016)
 10.2 — 
Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated December 14, 2016, by and among Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Vistra Operations Company LLC, Vistra Intermediate Company LLC and the other Credit Parties and Lenders party thereto.
10.24
333-215288
Amendment No. 1
to Form S-1
(filed February 14, 2017)
10.3—
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated February 1, 2017, by and among Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Vistra Operations Company LLC, Vistra Intermediate Company LLC and the other Credit Parties and Lenders party thereto.
 
10.25 
333-215288
Amendment No. 1
to Form S-1
(filed February 14, 2017)
 10.3 — 
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated February 1, 2017, by and among Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Vistra Operations Company LLC, Vistra Intermediate Company LLC and the other Credit Parties and Lenders party thereto.
10.25
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.4—
Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated February 28, 2017, by and among Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Vistra Operations Company LLC, Vistra Intermediate Company LLC and the other Credit Parties and Lenders party thereto.
 
10.26 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.4 — 
Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated February 28, 2017, by and among Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Vistra Operations Company LLC, Vistra Intermediate Company LLC and the other Credit Parties and Lenders party thereto.
10.26
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed August 17, 2017)
10.1—
Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2017 (effective August 17, 2017), by and among Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Vistra Operations Company LLC, Vistra Intermediate Company LLC and the other Credit Parties and Lenders party thereto.
 
10.27 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed August 17, 2017)
 10.1 — 
Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2017 (effective August 17, 2017), by and among Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Vistra Operations Company LLC, Vistra Intermediate Company LLC and the other Credit Parties and Lenders party thereto.
10.27
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed December 14, 2017)
10.1—
Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 14, 2017 (effective December 14, 2017), by and among Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Vistra Operations Company LLC, Vistra Intermediate Company LLC and the other Credit Parties and Lenders party thereto.
 
10.2810.28
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed February 22, 2018)
10.1—
Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2018 (effective February 20, 2018), by and among Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Vistra Operations Company LLC, Vistra Intermediate Company LLC and the other Credit Parties and Lenders party thereto.
10.2910.29
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed June 15, 2018)
10.1—
Seventh Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of June 14, 2018, by and among Vistra Operations Company LLC, Vistra Intermediate Company LLC, the other Credit Parties party thereto, Credit Suisse and Citibank, N.A. as the 2018 Incremental Term Loan Lenders, the various other Lenders party thereto, Credit Suisse as Successor Administrative Agent and as Successor Collateral Agent, and Delaware Trust Company, as Collateral Trustee.
10.3010.30
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed April 4, 2019)
10.4—
Eighth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated March 29, 2019, by and among Vistra Operations Company LLC, Vistra Intermediate Company LLC, the other Credit Parties (as defined in the Vistra Operations Credit Agreement) party thereto, Bank of Montreal, Chicago Branch, as new Revolving Loan Lender, Revolving Letter of Credit Issuer and Joint Lead Arranger, the various other Lenders and Letter of Credit Issuers party thereto, and Credit Suisse as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent
185
Table of Contents
Exhibits Previously Filed With File Number* 
As
Exhibit
 ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
10.28 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed December 14, 2017)
 10.1 — 
Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 14, 2017 (effective December 14, 2017), by and among Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Vistra Operations Company LLC, Vistra Intermediate Company LLC and the other Credit Parties and Lenders party thereto.
 
10.29 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed February 22, 2018)
 10.1 — 
Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2018 (effective February 20, 2018), by and among Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Vistra Operations Company LLC, Vistra Intermediate Company LLC and the other Credit Parties and Lenders party thereto.
 
10.30 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed June 15, 2018)
 10.1 — 
Seventh Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of June 14, 2018, by and among Vistra Operations Company LLC, Vistra Intermediate Company LLC, the other Credit Parties party thereto, Credit Suisse and Citibank, N.A. as the 2018 Incremental Term Loan Lenders, the various other Lenders party thereto, Credit Suisse as Successor Administrative Agent and as Successor Collateral Agent, and Delaware Trust Company, as Collateral Trustee.

 
10.31 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 7, 2018)
 10.1 — 
Purchase Agreement, dated August 7, 2018, by and among Vistra Operations Company LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., on behalf of itself and the several Initial Purchasers named in Schedule I to the Purchase Agreement
10.31
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed May 29, 2019)
10.1—
Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated May 29, 2019, by and among Vistra Operations Company LLC, Vistra Intermediate Company LLC, the other Credit Parties (as defined in the Vistra Operations Credit Agreement) party thereto, Sun Trust Bank, as incremental Revolving Loan Lender, and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Island Branch, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent
 
10.32 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on January 24, 2019)
 10.1 — 
Purchase Agreement, dated January 22, 2019, by and among Vistra Operations Company LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. On behalf of itself and the several Initial Purchasers named in Schedule I to the Purchase Agreement
10.32001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on November 21, 2019)		10.1—
Tenth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated November 15, 2019, by and among Vistra Operations Company LLC (as Borrower), Vistra Intermediate Company LLC (as Holdings), the other Credit Parties (as defined in the Credit Agreement) party thereto, the other Credit Parties (as defined in the Credit Agreement) party thereto, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch (as the 2019 Incremental Term Loan Lender and as Administrative Agent and as Collateral Agent), and the other Lenders party thereto
 
10.33 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
 10.10 
Assumption Agreement, dated as of April 9, 2018, between Vistra Energy Corp. (as successor by merger to Dynegy Inc.), and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as Administrative Agent and as Collateral Trustee.
10.33001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 7, 2018)		10.1—
Purchase Agreement, dated August 7, 2018, by and among Vistra Operations Company LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., on behalf of itself and the several Initial Purchasers named in Schedule I to the Purchase Agreement
 
10.34 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
 10.11 
Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of April 23, 2013, among Dynegy Inc., the subsidiaries of the borrower from time to time party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as Collateral Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Dynegy Inc. filed on April 24, 2013).
10.34001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on January 24, 2019)		10.1—
Purchase Agreement, dated January 22, 2019, by and among Vistra Operations Company LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. On behalf of itself and the several Initial Purchasers named in Schedule I to the Purchase Agreement
 
10.35 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
 10.12 
Joinder, dated as of April 9, 2018, among Vistra Energy Corp., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as Collateral Trustee.
10.35001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 7, 2019)		10.1—
Purchase Agreement, dated June 4, 2019, by and among Vistra Operations Company LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., on behalf of itself and the several Initial Purchasers named in Schedule I to the Purchase Agreement
 
10.36 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
 10.13 
Collateral Trust and Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of April 23, 2013 among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors (as defined therein), Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch and each person party thereto from time to time (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Dynegy Inc. filed on April 24, 2013).
10.36001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 7, 2019)		10.2—
Purchase Agreement, dated June 6, 2019, by and among Vistra Operations Company LLC and Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, on and behalf of itself and the several Initial Purchasers named in Schedule I to the Purchase Agreement
 
 Other Material Contracts
10.37 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.5 — 
Collateral Trust Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2016, by and among TEX Operations Company LLC (now known as Vistra Operations LLC), the Grantors from time to time thereto, Railroad Commission of Texas, as first-out representative, and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as senior credit agreement representative
10.37001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on November 13, 2019)		10.1—
Purchase Agreement, dated November 6, 2019, by and among Vistra Operations Company LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, on behalf of itself and the several Initial Purchases named in Schedule I to the Purchase Agreement
 
10.38 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 15, 2018)
 10.2 — 
Amendment to Collateral Trust Agreement, effective as of June 14, 2018, among Vistra Operations Company LLC, the other Grantors from time to time party thereto, Railroad Commission of Texas, as first-out representative, and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as senior credit agreement agent, and Delaware Trust Company, as Collateral Trustee
10.38
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
10.10—
Assumption Agreement, dated as of April 9, 2018, between Vistra Energy Corp. (now known as Vistra Corp.) (as successor by merger to Dynegy Inc.), and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as Administrative Agent and as Collateral Trustee.
 
10.3910.39
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
10.11—
Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of April 23, 2013, among Dynegy Inc., the subsidiaries of the borrower from time to time party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as Collateral Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Dynegy Inc. filed on April 24, 2013).
10.4010.40
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
10.12—
Joinder, dated as of April 9, 2018, among Vistra Energy Corp. (now known as Vistra Corp.), the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as Collateral Trustee.
10.4110.41
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
10.13—
Collateral Trust and Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of April 23, 2013 among Dynegy, the Subsidiary Guarantors (as defined therein), Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch and each person party thereto from time to time (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Dynegy Inc. filed on April 24, 2013).
186
Table of Contents
Exhibits Previously Filed With File Number* 
As
Exhibit
 ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
10.39 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 15, 2018)
 10.3 — 
Collateral Trust Joinder, dated June  14, 2018, between the Additional Grantors party thereto and Delaware Trust Company, as Collateral Trustee, to the Collateral Trust Agreement, effective pursuant to the Seventh Amendment as of June 14, 2018, among Vistra Operations Company LLC, the other Grantors from time to time party thereto, Railroad Commission of Texas, as First-Out Representative, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as Senior Credit Agreement Agent, and Delaware Trust Company, as Collateral Trustee.

 
10.40 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.13 — 
Tax Receivable Agreement, by and between TEX Energy LLC (now known as Vistra Energy Corp.) and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as transfer agent, dated as of October 3, 2016
 
10.41 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.14 — 
Tax Matters Agreement, by and among TEX Energy LLC (now known as Vistra Energy Corp.), Energy Future Holdings Corp., Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFI Finance Inc. and EFH Merger Co. LLC, dated as of October 3, 2016
 Other Material Contracts
10.42 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.15 — 
Transition Services Agreement, by and between Energy Future Holdings Corp. and TEX Operations Company LLC (now known as Vistra Operations Company LLC), dated as of October 3, 2016
10.42
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.5—
Collateral Trust Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2016, by and among TEX Operations Company LLC (now known as Vistra Operations LLC), the Grantors from time to time thereto, Railroad Commission of Texas, as first-out representative, and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as senior credit agreement representative
 
10.43 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.16 — 
Separation Agreement, by and between Energy Future Holdings Corp., TEX Energy LLC (now known as Vistra Energy Corp.) and TEX Operations Company LLC (now known as Vistra Operations LLC), dated as of October 3, 2016
10.43001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 15, 2018)		10.2—
Amendment to Collateral Trust Agreement, effective as of June 14, 2018, among Vistra Operations Company LLC, the other Grantors from time to time party thereto, Railroad Commission of Texas, as first-out representative, and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as senior credit agreement agent, and Delaware Trust Company, as Collateral Trustee
 
10.44 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.17 — 
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of November 25, 2015, by and between La Frontera Ventures, LLC and Luminant Holding Company LLC
10.44001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 15, 2018)		10.3—
Collateral Trust Joinder, dated June 14, 2018, between the Additional Grantors party thereto and Delaware Trust Company, as Collateral Trustee, to the Collateral Trust Agreement, effective pursuant to the Seventh Amendment as of June 14, 2018, among Vistra Operations Company LLC, the other Grantors from time to time party thereto, Railroad Commission of Texas, as First-Out Representative, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as Senior Credit Agreement Agent, and Delaware Trust Company, as Collateral Trustee.
 
10.45 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.18 — 
Amended and Restated Split Participant Agreement, by and between Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC (f/k/a TXU Electric Delivery Company) and TEX Operations Company LLC (now known as Vistra Operations Company LLC), dated as of October 3, 2016
10.45
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.13—
Tax Receivable Agreement, by and between TEX Energy LLC (now known as Vistra Corp.) and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as transfer agent, dated as of October 3, 2016
 
10.46 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.27 — 
Lease Agreement, dated February 14, 2002, between State Street Bank and Trust Company of Connecticut, National Association, an owner trustee of ZSF/Dallas Tower Trust, a Delaware grantor trust, as lessor and EFH Properties Company (now known as Vistra EP Properties Company), as Lessee (Energy Plaza Property)
10.46
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.14—
Tax Matters Agreement, by and among TEX Energy LLC (now known as Vistra Corp.), EFH Corp., Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFI Finance Inc. and EFH Merger Co. LLC, dated as of October 3, 2016
 
10.47 
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
 10.28 — 
First Amendment, dated June 1, 2007, to Lease Agreement, dated February 14, 2002
10.47
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.15—
Transition Services Agreement, by and between Energy Future Holdings Corp. and TEX Operations Company LLC (now known as Vistra Operations Company LLC), dated as of October 3, 2016
 
10.48 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed July 7, 2017)
 10(a) — 
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 5, 2017, by and among Odessa-Ector Power Partners, L.P., La Frontera Holdings, LLC, Vistra Operations Company LLC, Koch Resources, LLC
10.48
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.16—
Separation Agreement, by and between Energy Future Holdings Corp., TEX Energy LLC (now known as Vistra Corp.) and TEX Operations Company LLC (now known as Vistra Operations LLC), dated as of October 3, 2016
 
10.49 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed October 31, 2017)
 10.1 — 
Merger Support Agreement, dated as of October 29, 2017, by and between Vistra Energy Corp. and Terawatt Holdings, LP
10.49
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.17—
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of November 25, 2015, by and between La Frontera Ventures, LLC and Luminant Holding Company LLC
 
10.50 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed October 31, 2017)
 10.2 — 
Merger Support Agreement, dated as of October 29, 2017, by and among Vistra Energy Corp. and Oaktree Opportunities Fund VIII, L.P., Oaktree Huntington Investment Fund, L.P., Oaktree Opportunities Fund VIII (Parallel 2), L.P., Oaktree Opportunities Fund VIIIb, L.P., Oaktree Opportunities Fund IX, L.P. and Oaktree Opportunities Fund IX (Parallel 2), L.P.
10.50
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.18—
Amended and Restated Split Participant Agreement, by and between Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC (f/k/a TXU Electric Delivery Company) and TEX Operations Company LLC (now known as Vistra Operations Company LLC), dated as of October 3, 2016
 
10.5110.51
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed July 7, 2017)
10(a)—
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 5, 2017, by and among Odessa-Ector Power Partners, L.P., La Frontera Holdings, LLC, Vistra Operations Company LLC, Koch Resources, LLC
10.5210.52001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on October 16, 2020)		10.1—
187
Table of Contents
Exhibits Previously Filed With File Number* 
As
Exhibit
 ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
10.51 
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)
 10.1 — 
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Rights Agreement dated as of August 22, 2018, by and among the Company and the Guarantors (as defined therein)
10.5310.53001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on October 16, 2020)		10.2—
Master Repurchase Agreement, dated as of October 9, 2020, between TXU Energy Retail Company LLC and MUFG Bank, Ltd.
10.5410.54001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on December 28, 2020)		10.1—
Joinder Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2020, among TXU Energy Retail company LLC, as seller party agent, Vistra Operations Company LLC, as guarantor, certain originators named therein, and MUFG Bank, Ltd., as buyer
 
(21) Subsidiaries of the Registrant(21)Subsidiaries of the Registrant
 
21.1 ** — 
Significant Subsidiaries of Vistra Energy Corp.
21.1**—
 
(23) Consent of Experts(23)Consent of Experts
 
23.1 ** — 
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
23.1**—
 
(31) Rule 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) Certifications(31)Rule 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) Certifications
 
31.1 ** — 
Certification of Curtis A. Morgan, principal executive officer of Vistra Energy Corp., pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.1**—
Certification of Curtis A. Morgan, principal executive officer of Vistra Corp., pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
31.2 ** — 
Certification of J. William Holden, principal financial officer of Vistra Energy Corp., pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2**—
Certification of James A. Burke, principal financial officer of Vistra Corp., pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
(32) Section 1350 Certifications(32)Section 1350 Certifications
 
32.1 ** — 
Certification of Curtis A. Morgan, principal executive officer of Vistra Energy Corp., pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1***—
Certification of Curtis A. Morgan, principal executive officer of Vistra Corp., pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
32.2 ** — 
Certification of J. William Holden, principal financial officer of Vistra Energy Corp., pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2***—
Certification of James A. Burke, principal financial officer of Vistra Corp., pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
(95) Mine Safety Disclosures(95)Mine Safety Disclosures
 
95.1 ** — 
Mine Safety Disclosures
95.1**—
 
 XBRL Data FilesXBRL Data Files
 
101.INS ** — XBRL Instance Document101.INS**—The following financial information from Vistra Corp.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 formatted in Inline XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) includes: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (v) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
101.SCH ** — XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document101.SCH**—XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
101.CAL ** — XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Document101.CAL**—XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
101.DEF ** — XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document101.DEF**—XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
101.LAB ** — XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Document101.LAB**—XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
101.PRE ** — XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Document101.PRE**—XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104104—The Cover Page Interactive Data File does not appear in Exhibit 104 because its XBRL tags are embedded within the inline XBRL document.
____________________
*
*    Incorporated herein by reference
**Filed herewith

Item 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY

**    Filed herewith
Not applicable.***    Furnished herewith



188
Table of Contents


Item 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

189
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Vistra Energy Corp. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

VISTRA ENERGY CORP.
Date:February 28, 201926, 2021By/s/ CURTIS A. MORGAN
Curtis A. Morgan (President and Chief(Chief Executive Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Vistra Energy Corp. and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ CURTIS A. MORGANPrincipal Executive Officer and DirectorFebruary 26, 2021
(Curtis A. Morgan, Chief Executive Officer)
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ CURTISJAMES A. MORGANBURKEPrincipal Executive Officer and DirectorFebruary 28, 2019
(Curtis A. Morgan, President and Chief Executive Officer)
/s/ J. WILLIAM HOLDENPrincipal Financial OfficerFebruary 28, 201926, 2021
(J. William Holden, Executive ViceJames A. Burke, President and Chief Financial Officer)
/s/ CHRISTY DOBRYPrincipal Accounting OfficerFebruary 28, 201926, 2021
(Christy Dobry, Senior Vice President and Controller)
/s/ SCOTT B. HELMChairman of the Board and DirectorFebruary 28, 201926, 2021
(Scott B. Helm, Chairman of the Board)
/s/ HILARY E. ACKERMANNDirectorFebruary 28, 201926, 2021
(Hilary E. Ackermann)
/s/ ARCILIA C. ACOSTADirectorFebruary 26, 2021
(Arcilia C. Acosta)
/s/ GAVIN R. BAIERADirectorFebruary 28, 201926, 2021
(Gavin R. Baiera)
/s/ PAUL M. BARBASDirectorFebruary 28, 201926, 2021
(Paul M. Barbas)
/s/ LISA M. CRUTCHFIELDDirectorFebruary 26, 2021
(Lisa M. Crutchfield)
/s/ BRIAN K. FERRAIOLIDirectorFebruary 28, 201926, 2021
(Brian K. Ferraioli)
/s/ JEFF D. HUNTERDirectorFebruary 28, 201926, 2021
(Jeff D. Hunter)
/s/ CYRUS MADONDirectorFebruary 28, 2019
(Cyrus Madon)
/s/ GEOFFREY D. STRONGDirectorFebruary 28, 2019
(Geoffrey D. Strong)
/s/ JOHN R. SULTDirectorFebruary 28, 201926, 2021
(John R. Sult)
/s/ BRUCE ZIMMERMANDirectorFebruary 28, 2019
(Bruce Zimmerman)



194
190