Regulatory Risk Factors
•Our SDA applications may not be approved, and any rework necessary to address NRC concerns could significantly delay the commercialization of our products.products;
•Our design is only approved in the United States and we must obtain approvals on a country- by-country basis before we can complete the sale of our products abroad, which approvals may be delayed or denied or which may require modification to our design;
•Our customers must obtain additional regulatory approvals before they construct power plants using our NPMs, and approvals may be denied or delayed;
•Our customers could incur substantial costs as a result of violations of, or liabilities under, environmental laws; and
•Our business is subject to a wide variety of extensive and evolving government laws and regulations. Changes in and/or failure to comply with such laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business.
General Risk Factors
•Our business has similar vulnerabilitiesWe are subject to cybersecurity events as other businesses,risk; and
•Changes in that a cyber eventtax laws or regulations may limit access to information needed to deliver our product to our customers, may compromise personnel or customer data kept in our systems, may corrupt proprietary information necessary to manufacture or receive regulatory approval for our designs,increase tax uncertainty and may cause other similar difficulties as may be expected for a businessadversely affect results of our kind.operations and our effective tax rate.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Shares of Class A common stock and Warrants
•We are subject to risks related to the volatility of theThe price of ourshares of Class A common stock and Warrants;Warrants may be volatile;
•The resale of shares we have registered on a registration statement on Form S-1,S-3, which represent a majority of the shares that are or will be outstanding, could cause the market price of our stock to drop significantly; andsignificantly.
•NuScale Warrants areand Options will become exercisable for shares of Class A common stock, which, if exercised, would increase the number of shares eligible for future resale in the public market and result in dilution to our stockholders.stockholders; and
•We have in the past and may in the future be subject to short selling strategies that could result in a reduction in the market price of our Class A common stock.
Part I
Item 1. Business
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this section to NuScale, the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to the consolidated operations of NuScale Corp and NuScale LLC.
Overview
NuScale is redefining nuclear power through the development of proprietary and innovative SMR technology that will deliver safe, scalable, cost-effective and reliable carbon-free power. Our core technology, the NPM,NuScale Power Module™ (“NPM”), can generate 77 MWe and is premised on well-established nuclear technology principles, with a focus on the integration of components, simplification or elimination of systems and use of passive safety features. We believe thisThis results in a safe and highly reliable power plant suitable to be sited close to where electricity or process heat is needed. Our flagship VOYGRTM (“VOYGR”) power plant is a scalable plant design that can accommodate up to 12 NPMs, resulting in a total gross output of 924 MWe. NuScale expects the first VOYGR power plant to be operational in 2029.
Since 2007, we and the DOE haveover $1.8 billion has been invested over $1.4 billion towardin the development of our NPM and VOYGRTM power plant technology and we have been issued 469455 patents globally, with an additional 186158 patent applications currently pending. In September 2020, our 12-module VOYGR-12TM design (currently approved for 160 million watts of thermal power (“MWt”) or 50 MWe per NPM) became the first and only SMR to receive a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standard Design Approval (SDA)an SDA from the NRC. The NRC’s final rulemaking approving NuScale’s design certification wasbecame effective in February 2023. The approval was a critical milestone that allows customers to move forward with plans to develop VOYGR power plants, knowing that safety aspects of the NuScale design are NRC-approved.
In December 2022, we appliedJanuary 2023, the Company submitted a second SDA Application and the associated licensing topical reports to the NRC for anNuScale’s 6-module, 77 MWe NPM design. On July 31, 2023, the NRC formally announced that it accepted the Company’s SDA Application for formal review. Once approved, customers in the United States will be able to reference the certified design and SDA for an increase in NPM power from 50 MWeexpedited construction and operating licensing of NuScale’s SMR pursuant to 77 MWe (160 MWt to 250 MWt) per module, which10 CFR Part 52. Based on the NRC’s published schedule for SDA Application review, we expect to receive in 2024. We expectthe NRC will complete its review and SDA approval to be ready to deliver modules to customersreceived by 2028.July 31, 2025.
Our unique SMR has several key defining characteristics, including:
•Proven. Our NPM technology leverages existing light water nuclear reactor technology and fuel supply that have been operating globally for over 60 years.
•Simple. NuScale’s simple NPM design, based on natural circulation, integrates the reactor core, steam generators and pressurizer in a single factory-built vessel and eliminates the need for reactor coolant circulating pumps, large bore piping and other components found in conventional large-scale nuclear reactors. This simplicity improves safety and reduces capital and operational costs.
•Scalable. In addition to our flagship 12-module (924 MWe) VOYGR-12TM power plant, we offer smaller power plant solutions including the six-module (462 MWe) VOYGR-6TM and the four-module (308 MWe) VOYGR-4TM. These VOYGR power plants can commence operation with one module and scale to house up to their approved capacity of twelve, six or four modules. This scalability will allow customers to right-size their up-front capital investment and economically increase installed capacity over time through the addition of NPMs.
•Safe. VOYGR power plants have been designed to be the safest nuclear plants in the world and have several industry-first advantages over conventional large-scale nuclear plants, including an unlimited “coping” period during which the NPMs can be shut down and kept in a safe condition without operator intervention, AC or DC power or any additional cooling water. As a result, we have numerous operational and commercial advantages including a safety case that supports a small, site-boundary emergency planning zone (“EPZ”) designation by the NRC, as well as various resiliency and reliability features including the ability to start and operate a plant without AC or DC power to provide first-responder power.
In addition to the sale of NPMs and our VOYGR power plant designs, we will offer a diversified suite of services throughout the development and operating life of the power plant. Our suite of services includesis planned to include licensing support, testing, training, fuel supply services and program management, among others. We anticipate that our service offeringservices offerings will have high penetration rates across our customer base and will provide consistent, recurring revenues throughout the life of thea VOYGR power plant. We expect service revenue to begin approximately eight years prior to a power plant’s commercial operation date and to extend throughout the life of the power plant.
1
Our potential customers are a mix of domestic and international governments, political subdivisions, utilities, state-owned enterprises and industrial companies in need of carbon-free, reliable energy. Our first contract to deploy a VOYGR power plant is with UAMPS. UAMPS is expected to deploy a six-module (462 MWe) VOYGR-6 power plant as part of its CFPP located at the Idaho National Laboratory near Idaho Falls, Idaho. Construction at the CFPP is expected to begin in 2025 and the plant is expected to be operational in 2029. Additionally, in November 2021, we signed a teaming agreement with
To date, the DOE has granted NuScale four separate cost-share awards totaling more than $656$578.3 million,, including most recently, $350 million as part of a 5-year, $700 million 50/50 cost-share award granted in 2020.2020 in which the DOE obligated $262.7 million through the 2023 fiscal year. We also benefit from a global network of strategic investors and supply chain partners that we expect will play an integral role in bringing NuScale’s technology to market around the world. Fluor, a leading global engineering, procurement and construction (“EPC”) firm, is the majority stockholder in NuScale and collaborates with NuScale on plant standard design and the provision of EPC services to NuScale’s customers. Other strategic investors and supply chain partners include Doosan;Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd; Sargent & Lundy, LLC; Sarens; JGC; IHI;Sarens Nuclear & Industrial Services, LLC; JGC Holdings Corporation; IHI Holdings Corporation; GS Energy Corporation; and Samsung C&T Corporation, among others.
As discussed in the section titled “Customers” below, the Company currently has only one “Class 1” customer:RoPower Nuclear S.A. (“RoPower”), which is a joint venture established by S.N. Nuclearelectrica S.A. (“Nuclearelectrica”) and Nova Power & Gas S.A. As noted below in the section titled, “Risks Related to NuScale’s Business and Industry”, in November 2023, we entered into the Release Agreement with CFPP LLC, the Company’s first customer, pursuant to which the Company agreed to terminate the DCRA, as amended, and our LLM Agreement. CFPP, LLC was receiving funding for about 79% of its qualified project costs, including the long-lead materials, under a cooperative agreement with the DOE. Under the Release Agreement, we agreed to repay CFPP LLC’s Net Development Costs. Once we reimburse these costs and terminate the LLM Agreement, we are entitled to the long-lead materials purchased under the LLM Agreement; however, because the Company is still in discussion with DOE regarding the means and timing for lifting a DOE lien on the long-lead materials (stemming from DOE’s funding under its cost share agreement with CFPP, LLC), the value of the long-lead materials may be significantly lower than reimbursement costs under the LLM Agreement. We may have to pay costs to DOE (in addition to the refund to CFPP LLC) to obtain the long-lead materials free of DOE liens in order to use the long-lead materials for a project at the CFPP site or for another customer. Until the Company formalizes an agreement with DOE and CFPP, LLC regarding disposition of the long-lead materials, there is no guarantee we will be able to use such materials in another project.
Merger Transaction
On December 13, 2021, Spring Valley, NuScale LLC and Merger Sub entered into the Merger Agreement. On May 2, 2022, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub merged into NuScale LLC (the “Merger”) with NuScale LLC surviving, Spring Valley was renamed NuScale Power Corporation, and NuScale LLC continued to be held as a wholly controlled subsidiary of NuScale Corp in an “Up-C” structure (collectively, the “Transaction”). As a result of the Transaction, NuScale Corp holds all of the NuScale LLC Class A units (which are the sole voting interests at the NuScale LLC level) and Legacy NuScale Equityholders hold NuScale LLC Class B units (which are non-voting) and shares of NuScale Corp Class B common stock (which entitle the Legacy NuScale Equityholder to vote at the NuScale Corp level but which carry no economic rights). At specified times, in NuScale Corp’s discretion, Legacy NuScale Equityholders may exchange NuScale LLC Class B units (together with cancellation of an equal number of shares of NuScale Corp Class B common stock) for NuScale Corp Class A common stock.
The Transaction was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization as provided under GAAP, with NuScale Corp treated as the acquired company and NuScale LLC treated as the acquirer. This determination reflects that Legacy NuScale Equityholders hold a majority of the voting power of NuScale Corp, that NuScale LLC’s pre-Merger operations constitute the majority post-merger operations of NuScale Corp, and that NuScale LLC’s management team retained similar roles at NuScale Corp.
Industry
According to BloombergNEF’s New Energy Outlook 2021 (“Red Scenario” (“NEO 2021”), which includes SMR capacity as part of the pathway to global net-zero carbon emissions, global power consumption is expected to increase 191% between 2020 and 2040, requiring approximately 22,000 gigawatts (“GW”) of additional generating capacity. Today, the energy and power markets are undergoing dramatic changes as they shift from fossil fuels to carbon-free sources. A series of technological, economic, regulatory, social and investor pressures are leading the drive to decarbonize electricity and other sectors, such as transportation (electric vehicles) and buildings (electric heating). As such, the majority of required global capacity
2
additions, including the replacement of existing carbon-intensive power generation, is expected to come from carbon-free generation.
Technology Improvements. Technology advancements will continueare expected to have a tremendous influence on world energy mix in the future. According to the BloombergNEF,NEO 2021, solar photovoltaic (“PV”) capacity has grown 37% annually since 2000 and now accounts for approximately 10% of global powerpower generation capacity. A primary reason for this growth has been technological advances throughout the solar value chain, resulting in an approximate 96% decline in PV module prices from $4.90 to $0.20 per watt over that same period, according to International Energy Agency. We believe that technological improvements in SMRs and other carbon-free generation sources will catalyze similar adoption trends going forward.
Economic and Reliability Requirements. Utilities are looking to deploy carbon-free power generation technologies due to a variety of economic and reliability drivers. Renewables such as wind and solar, now have a levelized cost of electricity similar to that of many traditional forms of power and have become a focal point in the push to deploy carbon-free generation. However, renewables alone are not a practical solution for regional power grids and baseload generation is required to solve for factors such as intermittency, transmission constraints and land use limitations. In these cases, we believe that nuclear, and specifically SMRs, are the onlymost viable carbon-free baseload power solution that can address the global need for carbon-free generation.
Regulatory Mandates and Government Funding. On December 8, 2021, President Biden signed an executive order mandating all electricity procured by the government be 100% carbon pollution-free by 2030, including at least 50% from around-the-clock dispatchable generation sources. The order also requires that federally owned buildings produce no net emissions by 2045 and that each federal agency achieve 100% zero-emission vehicle acquisitions by 2035. Additionally, on November 15, 2021, the U.S. Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act was signed into law that includes $65 billion in funding for power and grid investments. This includes investments in grid reliability and resiliency as well as clean energy technologies such as carbon capture, hydrogen and advanced nuclear, including SMRs.
Internationally, more than 190 countries and the European Union have signed the Paris Agreement, which seeks to keep the rise in mean global temperature to below 2°C above pre-industrial levels. Currently, more than 130 countries, including China and the United States – the countries with the first and second largest CO2 emissions globally – have now set, or are considering setting, a target of reducing net emissions to zero by mid-century. Further, at the 2023 United Nations Climate Change Conference, more than 20 countries from four continents made a declaration to work together to advance a goal of tripling nuclear energy capacity globally by 2050.
Social and Environmental Preferences. The effects of climate change, including extreme weather events and rising temperature, and the resulting health and socio-economic stability of at-risk populations, have led to a societal focus on the environment. As a result, a global shift is occurring in societal preferences for a reduction in greenhouse gases and a move towards carbon-free power.
Investor Pressures. ESG investing has accelerated as institutional investors shift their portfolios away from carbon‐intensive assets. According to a recent2023 study by the Global Sustainable Investment Alliance, in 2020 approximately 36%$30.3 trillion of global assets under management are “sustainable investments” that consider ESG factors. While there has been some retraction in companies trying to satisfy the needs of ESG-focused investing, shareholder advisory services, like Glass Lewis, adopted a policy for the 2023 proxy season to generally recommending voting against the governance committee chairs of Russell 1000 index companies that fail to provide explicit disclosures about the board’s role in overseeing environmental and social issues. This shift in investor sentiment has caused many large integrated energy companies, such as BP plc and Royal Dutch Shell plc, to set decarbonization strategies and diversifyto consider diversifying into different forms of carbon-free energy.
Our Market Opportunity
According to the NEO 2021, approximately 16,000 GW of carbon-free generation capacity additions are required globally through 2040 to meet domestic and international climate goals. These additions are a result of the growth in projected power use and the replacement of existing carbon-intensive generation, primarily from coal, oil and natural gas.
Although critical in helping meet climate goals, renewables, such as solar and wind, and hydroelectric are constrained due to intermittency, seasonality and issues associated with land use and grid interconnections. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the average 20202022 capacity factor (the ratio of actual power output over generation capacity) for solar, wind and hydro was 24.2%24.4%, 35.3%35.9%, and 40.7%36.3%, respectively, compared to 92.4%92.7% for nuclear. In most regions globally, flexible and dispatchable sources, such as long-duration storage, geothermal, gas, coal with carbon capture and nuclear, will be essential. Among these sources, SMRs represent an attractive option based on their near-term viability, competitive costs, carbon-free emissions and reliability.
3
Market Opportunity and the Role of SMRs
SMRs are small nuclear reactors designed with scalable technology using module factory fabrication that pursue economies of series production and short construction times. The four primary technologies currently being pursued in SMRs are water-cooled reactors, fast neutron reactors, high temperature gas reactors and molten salt reactors. Light water reactors, such as our NPM, are considered by the World Nuclear Association to have the lowest technological risk and are the most developed from a commercial perspective benefiting from decades of proven technology.
SMRs have a number of inherent advantages over traditional large-scale nuclear and other carbon-free power generation, including:
•Simplicity of Design. Large scale nuclear plants, which typically generate 1 GW or more, are complex in terms of design and construction. SMRs are simpler to manufacture, construct, operate and maintain. SMRs are also designed to eliminate many of the nuclear components needed in large-scale plants which adds to their simplicity.
•Enhanced Safety Features. Although our NPM is the only SMR with an NRC-approved safety case, according to the DOE, “small modular reactors have the potential for enhanced safety and security compared to earlier designs.” The smaller reactor core and reduced potential for off-site release from SMRs means SMRs may be located closer to population centers and industrial facilities needing process heat. The robust design, small fuel inventory, and multiple barriers preventing fission product release contribute to a low probability and consequence of radionuclide release, even under extreme upset conditions, thus simplifying the emergency preparedness and response and providing a basis for reducing the EPZ. NuScale is the only company to obtain approval of its EPZ methodology from the NRC (or any
other national government nuclear regulatory body) and NuScale is the only SMR developer to have an approved regulatory basis for obtaining a site boundary EPZ. In 2022, the NRC approved a new methodology for SMR emergency planning; however, no other SMR vendor has had its methodology approved following the new criteria.
•Economics versus Traditional Nuclear. Traditional large-scale nuclear facilities have high upfront capital costs due to the size of the power plants as well as long construction times. These plants require significant resource planning and utilities have hesitated to deploy the capital necessary to build large-scale nuclear plants because of these high costs. SMRs are simpler, smaller and the reactors are largely factory built, leading to shorter construction times and greater cost predictability.
•Modular and Scalable. SMRs can more easily match customer needs and avoid surplus capacity. Modularity results in splitting power plant development between the factory and the field, reducing the schedule risk that has impacted large reactor construction projects. The NuScale modular design has the benefit to customers of being right-sizable upon construction and scalable over time.
•Smaller Footprint. According to information published by E3 Consulting, we estimate that our SMR uses upa 2021 report, the Office of Nuclear Energy noted a typical 1,000-megawatt nuclear facility in the United States needs little more than one square mile to 99% lessoperate, while wind farms require 360 times more land per MWh comparedarea to windproduce the same amount of electricity and solar projects. We expect this resource efficiency will also extend to construction materials, such as steel, cement, concrete and glass: according to a 2015 DOE study, nuclear power generators required 90% less construction material on a tons per terawatt-hour basis than wind and solar upstream collection systems and generators.photovoltaic plants require 75 times more space. Furthermore, SMRs can be sited closer to the end-user, significantly reducing the need for transmission infrastructure while also providing ancillary benefits such as process heat to end users.
Our Technology
Our NPM is the product of approximately 1617 years of research and development by NuScale and key collaborators, including Oregon State University and the Idaho National Laboratory. Over $1.4$1.8 billion (including non-dilutive DOE grants) has been invested to date and the technology is protected by 655613 issued and pending patents globally.
A NuScale power plant is composed of multiple NPMs. Each NPM is capable of producing 77 MWe. The NPM consists of an integral reactor composed of the reactor core, helical coil steam generators and pressurizer within the reactor pressure vessel, enclosed in a steel containment vessel. The reactor core consists of an array of fuel assemblies and control rod clusters at standard enrichments. The helical coil steam generator consists of two independent sets of tube bundles with separate feedwater inlet and steam outlet lines. The integral reactor measures 65 feet tall and 9 feet in diameter. The containment vessel measures 76 feet tall and 15 feet in diameter and is much smaller and stronger than the concrete containment shells for large reactors. The NPM operates inside a stainless-steel lined water-filled pool located below ground level.
4
Our NPM technology leverages existing light water nuclear reactor technology and fuel that has been operating globally for over 60 years. The reactor operates using the principles of buoyancy-driven natural circulation; hence, no pumps are needed to circulate water through the reactor. Once the heated water reaches the top of the riser, it turns downward into an annulus where the hot water flows over the steam generator tubes. Water in the reactor system is kept separate from the
water inside the steam generator to prevent contamination. As the hot water in the reactor system passes over the hundreds of tubes in the steam generator, heat is transferred through the tube walls and the water inside the tubes turns to superheated steam. This innovative design eliminates the need for reactor coolant pumps, large bore piping, complex safety systems and other components found in conventional large-scale nuclear reactors. The result is a simplified system that improves safety and reduces capital and operational costs.
Design Features and Innovations
Our NPM introduces a number of key design innovations that allows us to be the safest and most reliable provider of nuclear energy. Our design features include:
•Proven Technology. Our NPM design relies on well-established pressurized, light water reactor technology. As such, a VOYGR power plant can be licensed within the existing regulatory framework for light water reactors, drawing on a vast body of established research and development, proven codes and methods and existing regulatory standards. Because our technology was designed on the basis of this proven foundation, we believe NuScale has a significant advantage over other alternative and yet unproven nuclear technologies that may come to market, both with respect to obtaining regulatory approvals and attracting customer interest. NuScale received NRC Standard Design Approval for its 12-NPM, 50 MWe design in September 2020 and design certification in February 2023. NuScale has applied for NRC Standard Design Approval for its 6-NPM, 77 MWe design.
•Single, Integrated Unit. The NPM incorporates all of the components for steam generation and heat exchange into a single integrated unit. This design eliminates all large bore interconnection piping, which is historically a potential source of failure and cause of construction complexity for large-scale reactors.
•Compact Size. Each NPM, including the containment vessel, can be entirely fabricated in a factory and shipped by rail, truck, or barge to the power plant site for assembly and installation. Fabrication of the modules in a factory environment reduces fabrication cost, improves quality, reduces construction time and increases schedule predictability. This is a distinct benefit compared to traditional large-scale nuclear plants in which reactors are built on-site and only after their completion can the balance of the plant be constructed. We can fabricate our NPMs in parallel with VOYGR power plant construction, saving time and reducing complexity, labor and construction costs.
•Natural Circulation. The reactor core of our NPM is cooled entirely by natural circulation of water. Natural circulation provides a significant advantage in that it reduces capital and operational costs by eliminating reactor coolant pumps, pipes and valves and the associated power, maintenance and potential failures of those components.
•Refueling and Maintenance Innovations. Each NPM can produce power continuously for approximately 20 months before refueling is required. Because of the multi-module design of VOYGR power plants, each NPM can be refueled in a staggered manner, reducing total plant output by only 77 MWe for approximately 10 days. This significantly reduces the cost of replacement power compared to large-scale nuclear plants (typically 1,000 MWe) that must shut
5
down their entire capacity for any outage. Whereas large-scale nuclear plants can require as many as 1,000 or more individuals for refueling and associated outage activities, a VOYGR power plant can undergo the same refueling and outage activities with a much smaller, permanent, in-house crew of as few as 50 individuals.
•Multi-Module Control Room. NuScale has designed, and received NRC approval for, an innovative control room that can control up to 12 NPMs with only three licensed operators. This compares with traditional large-scale nuclear plants that require a minimum six licensed operators for three reactors. This innovation is enabled by NuScale’s proprietary platform called the Highly Integrated Protection System (“HIPS”). The HIPS platform provides a robust safety platform to monitor NPMs and help protect VOYGR power plants from potential cybersecurity attacks.
Safety Case
NuScale’s design innovations have allowed for a number of industry-first and best-in-class safety attributes.
•Unlimited “coping period”. Our NPMs are designed with fully passive safety systems and are kept safe in a cooling condition for an unlimited time following any extreme event that renders a power plant without external power. During the span of such an event and for an unlimited time, the VOYGR power plant does not require any internal or external human or computer actions, AC or DC power or additional water to cool the reactors (referred to as NuScale’s Triple Crown For Nuclear Plant Safety). An unlimited coping period is unprecedented for commercial light water nuclear reactors. Historically, commercial light water nuclear reactors have maximum coping periods of 72 hours before operator action is required to keep the reactor safe.
•Support for Site Boundary EPZ. NuScale’s VOYGR power plants have been designed to allow an NRC-approved EPZ that does not extend beyond the power plant site boundary (the restricted area controlled by the plant owner). The NRC has approved NuScale’s methodology for calculating EPZ size. This methodology, approved solely for
NuScale’s unique passively safe design, demonstrates that most NuScale plant sites in the U.S. can be approved with a 300-yard “site-boundary” EPZ. Currently operating commercial nuclear power plants in the U.S. are required to have a 10-mile radius EPZ from the reactor site and the population within the EPZ must be capable of evacuating within a specified time period. The smaller EPZ enables VOYGR power plants to be sited closer to end-users, which is of particular importance to process heat off-takers and to owners seeking to repower retiring coal-fired generation facilities.
•No Requirement for Backup Power. The NRC concluded that NuScale’s safety design eliminates the need for “Class 1E” power – i.e., safety-related, backup power. This means that VOYGR power plants do not need costly emergency diesel generators to ensure the safety of the reactors in the event of a power loss. Today, no operating nuclear plant in the United States can make this claim.
•Resilience to Man-made and Natural Events. The VOYGR reactor building is designed to withstand the impact from man-made and natural events, including floods, earthquakes (in excess of the Fukushima event), tornados and hurricanes in excess of 280 mph winds, and the impact of a large commercial airplane. The VOYGR power plant is also designed to safely shut down following an electromagnetic pulse or geomagnetic disturbance.
Technology-Enabled Operational Features
NuScale’s design innovations and best-in-class safety case create a number of technology-enabled operational features that no other carbon-free generation source can claim. These features address a host of critical industry needs with respect to grid resiliency and reliability and provide customers with related commercial benefits that other power generation solutions do not provide. Select features of NuScale’s VOYGR power plants include:
•No Requirement for connection to the grid. The VOYGR plant is the only commercial nuclear power plant approved by the NRC without requiring any connections to the transmission grid for safety. This allows off-grid operation such that NuScale plants can be sited in the proximity of industries needing electricity and process heat. It also enables a NuScale plant to replace a coal fired power station located at the end of a single transmission line.
•First Responder Power. When the transmission grid is lost, traditional large-scale nuclear power plants automatically and rapidly shutdown. Large-scale nuclear power plants are not capable of restarting, nor are they permitted to do so, until the transmission grid is restored because power from the grid (supplied by two off-site sources) is required to power the safety systems and operate the equipment necessary to start the power plant. The VOYGR power plant would remain at power, ready to immediately sell electricity to the grid when the grid is back online, making it a first responder to the restoration of the transmission grid.
•Black-Start Capability. A VOYGR power plant can start up from cold conditions without external grid connections. This NuScale design capability is a first-of-a-kind for the nuclear industry.
6
•Island Mode Power. A single NPM can supply all the “house load” electricity needs of the plant while also continuing to provide power to a local industrial customer or mission critical facility without external grid connection via a micro-grid connection.
•Highly Reliable Power. VOYGR-12 power plants will be able to provide 154 MWe of power to mission critical facilities with 99.95% availability over the 60-year life of the plant. In the event of a catastrophic loss of offsite grid and disruption of transportation infrastructure, a VOYGR-12 will be able to provide up to 120 MWe to a mission critical facility micro-grid for at least four years without refueling.
Design Validation and Testing
NuScale’s safety design has been validated through rigorous testing of critical components, such as fuel assemblies, control rod and control rod mechanisms and the integral helical coil steam generators. NuScale has constructed an electrically-heated, one-third scale, full-pressurefull-pressurized and temperature integral thermal-hydraulic test facility that demonstrates the operation of the entire nuclear steam supply system and safety systems.
In addition, we have proven the ability to safely operate 12 NPMs from a single control room by building and operating a full-scale simulated control room. Through comprehensive testing in this simulator, NuScale has shown that the demands on the reactor operators are significantly reduced compared with traditional large reactors, as a result of the simplicity of the design, advancements in digital controls, and the fact that NuScale’s design requires no operator-initiated safety functions for all design basis events. Through comprehensive analyses, demonstrations and audits, the NRC has approved NuScale’s conduct of operation such that three licensed operators can safely operate a VOYGR-12 plant without the need for a Shift Technical Advisor, a key safety-related role required by the NRC for all existing large-scale nuclear plants.
Products and Services
NuScale has determined that it currently operates in a single segment and will periodically reassess that determination as it nears commercialization and deployment of its NPMs.
NuScale VOYGR Power Plants
NuScale currently offers VOYGR power plant designs for three facility sizes that are scalable in that they are capable of housing from one to four, six or twelve NPMs.NPMs, and can commence operation with as few as one module. For each of these plant configurations, the total facility gross electric output can be as much as 308 MWe, 462 MWe or 924 MWe, respectively, based on a nameplate capacity of each NPM of 77 MWe. This scalability allows customers to right-size their up-front capital investment and economically increase installed capacity over time through the addition of NPMs as needed.
A customer seeking to deploy a VOYGR power plant will be granted a license from NuScale to construct, operate, maintain and decommission the VOYGR plant. NuScale will also provide design and nuclear regulatory licensing basis
7
information necessary for the customer to obtain regulatory approval to construct and operate the power plant. In exchange for this license, the customer will pay an upfront technology licensing fee to NuScale.
Sale of Equipment including NuScale Power Modules. In addition to the customer paid technology license, NuScale also expects to sell to the customer major nuclear engineered equipment. For the VOYGR power plant, this will consist of the NPMs, the reactor building crane, nuclear fuel, module assembly and handling equipment and other equipment associated with the nuclear steam supply system and nuclear fuel handling. handling and storage.NuScale expects to provide the manufacturing and delivery of modules to the customers’ VOYGR power plant site on a contracted basis. NuScale also expects to receive payment related to the fabrication of the NPMs
coincident with the order of materials and commencement of manufacturing so that no working capital will be required from NuScale for work-in-progress or finished inventory.
Services
We will also offer customers a diversified suite of services throughout the life of the power plant, beginning approximately eight years prior to a plant’s commercial operation date. Pre- and post-operation date service offerings provide customers with critical services related to the licensing, design, development, constructing,construction, operation and maintenance of the VOYGR power plant. As a first mover and developer of the power plant’s nuclear technology, we believe we are well positioned to be a trusted service provider. As such, we anticipate our services will have high penetration rates and will provide consistent, recurring revenues that could become significant once a large number of VOYGR plants are in operation.
Our services include:
•regulatory licensing support, including in the United States preparation and prosecution support for the customer’s desired regulatory approval regimes under either 10 CFR, Part 50 or Part 52 pursuant to U.S. NRC regulations;
•start-up testing and commissioning support;
•accredited training programs to support initial and ongoing power plant operations;
•management of all aspects of the U.S. NRC required inspections, tests, analysis and acceptance criteria process;
•NPM mechanical handling;
•initial and ongoing fuel bundle loading and movement;
•design engineering management during commercial operation;
•operations and maintenance program management, including regulatory compliance reporting support;
•procurement and spare parts management;
•nuclear fuel management including reload analysis; and
•outage planning and execution support; and
Competitive Strengths
Only Viable Carbon-free Baseload Power. Nuclear is the only viable carbon-free baseload power available to address the global need for carbon-free generation and to meet decarbonization targets year-round. Traditional baseload technologies, such as gas and coal, are carbon intensive; traditional nuclear is costly, complex and frequently subject to cost-overruns; and hydroelectric power is dependent on geography, rainfall, curtailment and other factors. Renewables such as wind and solar are intermittent and weather dependent, and batteries have not been scaled to make these viable baseload power sources. SMRs such as NuScale’s VOYGR power plants provide highly reliable, cost-effective, carbon-free baseload power to electric grids – no other existing baseload technology can claim the same benefits on the scale needed to address the world’s growing needs.
Innovative Technology Platform and Intellectual Property Portfolio. We have 469455 patents issued and an additional 186158 patents pending. These 655613 patents protect key aspects of our technology, and we continue to grow our intellectual property portfolio. In addition, we have a highly educated workforce of 556398 employees, of whom 248129 have master’s degrees in engineering and science and 2920 have Ph.Ds. We believe our intellectualintellectual property rights, as well as our highly skilled personnel are important assets necessary to maintain our competitive advantage in the market and expand on our technology platform.
First to Receive an SDA from the NRC. Although China and Russia have currently operating SMRs, ours is the first and only SMR to receive a Standard Design Approval (SDA)SDA from the NRC. This is an important regulatory milestone that provides customers with certainty – knowing that the NRC approves of the plant design – before committing significant capital to develop a nuclear facility. The SDA process took NuScale 41 months to complete – including preparation, application and receipt of approval. This was the fastest any nuclear reactor company has ever received approval from the NRC. To date, no SMR or advanced reactor company other than NuScale has even applied to the NRC for SMR design approval. We believe that this, and the fact that our design approval timeline was based on well-established light water nuclear technology, provides NuScale with a solid competitive advantage over other SMR competitors.
Unparalleled Safety Case. NuScale’sNuScale’s innovative, fully passive safety system design addresses the historical concerns of traditional large-scale nuclear power plants. In the event of a total loss of power to the facility, a VOYGR power plant does
not require any operator or computer actions, grid connection or emergency backup power or additional water to cool the
8
reactors and can remain safe indefinitely. All large-scale nuclear reactors require one or all three of these within a period of days. The rigorously tested safety case results in an array of applications and commercial opportunities for NuScale that traditional nuclear power plants cannot support, and VOYGR power plants can be located closer to end-users and population centers.
Global Network of Strategic Investors and Supply Chain Partners with DOE Support. We have developed a global network of blue-chip supply chain partners, many of which are investors in NuScale. We believe these partners will play a critical role in the successful procurement and fabrication of components, manufacture of our NPMs and fuel supply. In addition, we have also received significant financial and regulatory support from the DOE since the inception of NuScale. No other SMR or advanced nuclear technology has received the level of awards or grants (combined, among us and our customers) that the NuScale design has, and we maintain a strong relationship with the DOE.
Cost-Competitive. We areNuScale’s technology is cost-competitive both in the United States where the prevailing wholesale cost of baseload electricity is relatively low, and we are even more competitive globally where the baseload cost of electricity is typically higher. However, when customers decide on a generation technology, headline cost is not the only consideration.globally. Our technology’s reliability, resiliency and flexibility are key attributes both customers and regulators value that are not captured in LCOE.highly. We believe our competitive cost coupled with our differentiated capabilities gives us an advantage toover other technologies.
Visionary Management Team. We have an experienced and passionate team of leaders and innovators who have developed the technology over the years and run the operations of the business today. Our management team has an average of over 8 years at NuScale (founded 1617 years ago) and 3530 years of commercial and energy industry experience. Our executives have extensive prior management experience in nuclear and engineering organizations, such as the NRC, United States Navy, DOE, General Electric Company, Exelon Corporation, Framatome, Babcock & Wilcox Company, LLC and others. Among key members of NuScale’s executive leadership team is Dr. José N. Reyes, Ph.D., co-founder and Chief Technology Officer of the Company. Dr. Reyes is co-designer of the NuScale SMR and is an internationally recognized expert on passive safety system design, testing and operations for nuclear power plants. Dr. Reyes has served as a technical expert at the International Atomic Energy Agency and as an engineer with the Reactor Safety Division of the NRC. He is Professor Emeritus in the School of Nuclear Science and Engineering at Oregon State University, was inducted into the National Academy of Engineering in 2018 and holds over 150over 153 patents granted or pending in 2021 countries.
Competition
Our competitors are other power generation technologies, including traditional baseload, renewables, long duration storage and other nuclear reactors, including SMRs. We believe our competitive strengths differentiate us from our competition globally, in part because NuScale’s SMR technology is currently the only NRC-approved SMR technology capable of meeting the growing demand for carbon-free baseload generation.
Traditional Baseload. AccordingAccording to BloombergNEF, approximately 62% of global generation capacity in 2020 was natural gas, coal, oil and large-scale nuclear. These technologies are highly reliable, cost-effective, dispatchable and land use efficient. However, with the exception of traditional large-scale nuclear, these resources are carbon-intensive and we expect them to largely be replaced with carbon-free generation over time. Traditional large-scale nuclear power plants, while carbon-free, require significant upfront capital expenditures, have a history of extensive construction times, complex safety systems and do not have business cases apart from utility-scale generation. We believe our carbon-free SMR technology contains all of the positive attributes of traditional baseload and addresses many of the flaws of traditional nuclear power plants.
Renewables. According to BloombergNEF, approximately 38% of global generation capacity in 2020 was wind, solar, hydroelectric and other renewable power generation sources.sources. Although these sources generate carbon-free power, wind and solar are highly intermittent and non-dispatchable, and hydroelectric is seasonal and subject to curtailment. Additionally, since renewables are weather-dependent, they are too unreliable to support certain end-use cases, including mission-critical applications or industrial applications that require extensive on-site, always-available power. Due to their innovative design NuScale VOYGR plants can operate as baseload generation, load-follow renewables and/or support key industrial applications.
Other Advanced Nuclear Reactors. There are several reactor technologies that are in various stages of development, such as high temperature gas-cooled reactors, fast reactors, molten salt reactors, fusion technologies and others, and commercial SMRs are currently operating in China and Russia. These technologies, like ours, are designed to be clean, safe and highly
reliable. However, these technologies have not received regulatory approval in the United States, and many of the technologies have not been demonstrated and do not have fuel supply infrastructure in existence.place. Currently, we have the only SMR that has received a Standard Design Approvalan SDA from the NRC, and no other SMR company or customer has even applied for approval. Achieving Standard Design ApprovalSDA is a regulatory process that took us over $500 million to prepare and 41 months and over $200 million to complete.
9
Customers
We estimate the market size for SMR technology will grow to over $100 billion by 2035. Today we have a pipeline of over 120100 customer opportunities globally, which range from customer leads to aone contracted customer. We currently have two contractsone contract in place with UAMPS and RoPower that havehas a stated commercial operation datesdate in 2029-2030. We also currently have 17several MOUs in place with both utility and industrial customers across North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia. MOUs are an important step toward advancing to a definitive contracted customer and we believe many of these MOUs will convert into signed contracts over time. In December 2022, we completed our Standard Plant Design (“SPD”), which provides potential customers with a generic VOYGR power plant design that will serve as a starting point for deploying site-specific designs, including supporting client licensing and deployment activities. Prospective customers in the United States are gaining an understanding of the potential benefits from the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which provides production tax credits for certain existing nuclear power plants but, more importantly, for certain new nuclear power plants and specifically for advanced reactors and small modular reactors. International customers seeking to decarbonize and meet climate change goals are increasingly looking at NuScale Plantsplants as their means to meet energy needs and carbon-reduction goals.
RoPower/SNN. On November 4, 2021, NuScale and Nuclearelectrica, a national energy company in Romania that produces electricity, heat and nuclear fuel, signed a teaming agreement to advance the delivery of NuScale’s SMR technology, then expected to be as early as 2027.technology. NuScale and RoPower, Nuclear S.A. (RoPower), owned in equal shares by S.N. Nuclearelectrica S.A. and Nova Power & Gas S.A., announced on January 4, 2023, that a contract for Front-End Engineering and Design (FEED) work was signed between parties on December 28, 2022, marking a significant step toward the near-term deployment of a NuScale VOYGR small modular reactor (SMR)SMR power plant in Romania expected to occur by 2029.2029-2030. FEED Phase 1 work has completed and RoPower is in negotiations with a Fluor subsidiary to perform FEED Phase 2 work. NuScale would work as a subcontractor to Fluor during RoPower FEED Phase 2. RoPower is in negotiation with NuScale for a technology license agreement in support of FEED Phase 2.
Other Potential Customers. We have signed non-binding MOUs with 17several potential customers aroundaround the world, including in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia. Potential customers with which we have publicly announced MOUs include Bruce Power, CEZ Group, Grant County PUD, Shearwater Energy, Prodigy Clean Energy Ltd., Energoatom, Kazakhstan Nuclear Power Plant and Kozloduy NPP – New Build Plc. In October 2023, Standard Power announced that it had selected NuScale technology to deploy at two sites. Standard Power has expressed an interest in deploying 12 NuScale units at each of these sites to power Standard Power’s data center operations.
Growth Strategy
We intend to grow our business by leveraging our competitive advantages in scalability, safety, reliability and cost. We have a number of avenues to achieve our growth objectives:
Traditional and New Applications. We believe the market for NuScale VOYGR power plants is wherever non-intermittent, reliable, carbon-free power is needed. Initially, we are focused on replacing carbon intensive coal-fired power plants and as an alternative to new-build gas-fired generation. Additionally, we are focused on marketing VOYGR power plants to industrial and micro-grid customers in sectors that include direct air capture, water desalinization, hydrogen production and mission critical facilities.
International Customer Development. We continue to develop our international customer base as we foresee a majority of our customer demand over the long-term to be outside of the United States. Our team puts significant effort into developing dialogue with foreign governments and corporations in order to educate and market our technology. The 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference and other global climate events have generated significant inbound interest from potential global customers. We will continue to strengthen relations with these parties to accelerate sales globally. In our sales pipeline we have identified more than
10
Technology Advancements. Using our innovativeinnovative technology platform and robust intellectual property portfolio, NuScale is well-positioned to continue making technology advancements over time. These improvements include increasing power output, simplifying operations, reducing construction time and reducing production cost. Just as we increased power to 77 MWe per module without increasing module size or construction costs, our R&D team is continuously researching and developing ways to improve our technology and meet our customers’ energy needs – creating top line growth opportunities and potential for additional margin capture by NuScaleincreasing margins over time.
Development of New Products. We continue to explore the development of innovative new products based on our core NPM technology. For example, we are developing a micro-reactor for niche end-markets. Our micro-reactor design is a 0.01 MWe to 10 MWe module intended to supply power to remote, off-grid and small communities. Use applications could include mining, universities, space power, military installations and disaster relief. These micro-reactors are expected to be small, compact, highly reliable, fully automated and rapidly deployable.
Supply Chain
We have an establishedcommenced NPM long lead material procurement, including forging manufacturing, for the first plant, enabling us to begin utilizing our extensive global supply chain ecosystem for all NPM components and for the construction of VOYGR power plants. We also have strategic and commercial partnerships in place globally that allow us to outsourcecontract for the manufacturing of key NPM components, including the upper and lower reactor pressure vessels (riser and core internals), the steam generator and the upper and lower containment vessels.components.
We are working with suppliers, such as Doosan Enerbility;Enerbility Co., Ltd.; Precision Custom Components; Sarens;Components LLC; Sarens Nuclear & Industrial Services, LLC; Curtiss-Wright Corporation; and IHI Corporation, among others, who we expect to build components of NPMs to our specifications. Other key suppliers include Framatome, SA (fuel assemblies), Honeywell International Inc. (control systems), Paragon Energy Solutions (protection systems), Sensia LLC (sensors and instrumentation) and PaR Systems, Inc. (reactor building crane).
Partnerships
Fluor. Fluor, a leading global EPC firm, is the majority stockholder in NuScale and collaborates with NuScale on plant design and is a provider of engineering, project management, procurement and construction services. A number of the strategic investors including Fluor have business collaboration agreements with NuScale, under which the strategic investors have rights to perform engineering, procurement, construction and other specified services for NuScale.
DOE. The U.S. Department of Energy has granted NuScale four separate cost-share awards totaling more than $656.0 million$0.6 billion to develop, certify and commercialize our SMR technology. DOE-funded research in 2003 helped accelerate the development of NuScale’s SMR prior to forming NuScale in 2007. In addition, toNuScale has ongoing collaborations with DOE labs, including the DOE awards made toIdaho National Lab, Argonne National Lab, Oak Ridge National Lab and Pacific Northwest National Lab.
ENTRA1 Energy. NuScale UAMPS, our first customer, has received a $1.4 billion DOE cost-share award to support deployment of astrategic global commercialization partnership with ENTRA1 Energy focused on financing, distributing and deploying each NuScale VOYGR-6NPM and power plant. ENTRA1 Energy leverages NuScale's certified SMR technology to energize a diverse portfolio of energy production plants, supporting energy consumers’ distinct needs through bespoke structuring, development and deployment. An independent energy development and production company, ENTRA1 Energy is focused on navigating the energy transition spectrum to help deliver reliable, carbon-free energy. Through ENTRA1 Energy, we expect to be able to provide customized plant development, financing, ownership and operating structures that promote de-risking of an energy project and support each energy consumer’s unique needs.
ENTRA1 Energy power plants with NuScale SMR-inside is a unique and exclusive model that allows us to provide a one-stop-shop energy solution to customers globally.
Strategic Investors. NuScale has a global network of strategic investors and supply chain partners that we expect to play an integral role in bringing our technology to market around the world. In addition to Fluor, existing strategic investors and supply chain partners include Doosan Heavy Industries and Construction,Enerbility Co., Ltd., Sargent & Lundy, LLC, Sarens Nuclear & Industrial Services, LLC, JGC Holdings Corporation, IHI Corporation, GS Energy Corporation and Samsung C&T.&T Corporation.
Collaboration with Academic Institutions. NuScale has benefited from independent research, peer-reviewed studies and testing conducted by and with academic institutions, including Oregon State University, Boise State University, Colorado School of Mines, University of Houston, University of Idaho, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Kansas State University, University of Maryland, College Park, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University of Michigan, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Morgan State University, University of Nevada Las Vegas, North
11
Carolina State University , POLIMI (Italy), University of Sheffield (U.K.), University of Tennessee, Texas A&M, Utah State University, University of Utah, University of Wisconsin and University of Wyoming.
Other Collaboration. NuScale has been working with the International Atomic Energy Agency and regulators in Canada, Japan, Poland, Romania, the U.K. and Ukraine, and will be or are supporting our customers’ engagement with regulators in other international jurisdictions. We expect that our strategic relationships with governmental agencies will help facilitate the licensing our SMR in the United States and abroad, and that our relationships with experienced private companies, which have offices and projects in countries with potential NuScale customers, will allow us to reach customers globally.
Intellectual Property
As of December 31, 2022,2023, NuScale had been issued 469issued 455 patents globally, and had 186158 pending patents. These 655613 issued or pending patents, filed across 2221 jurisdictions including in the U.S., protect key aspects of our technology and continue to growdemonstrate the continued growth of our intellectual property portfolio. We believe our intellectual property rights are important assets for our success and we aggressively protect these rights to maintain our competitive advantage in the market.
We own all necessary rights to the intellectual property associated with our technology to allow any capable manufacturer the ability to fabricate or build to print all components of the NPM. We also commissioned and own the rights to a NuScale standard plant design, giving customers significant cost savings in designing and engineering the balance of plant needed for electricity generation. Approximately one-third of our patent portfolio relates to our safety system, one-third relates to power production and the remaining third to other categories such as software and to the reactor module, operability, modularity and inspection. NuScale’s proprietary module protection system was developed in-house and has been approved by the NRC. We manage our patent portfolio to maximize the lifecycle of protecting our intellectual property, and various components and aspects of our system are protected by patents that will expire at staggered times.
Research & Development
The NuScale team has spent 1617 years on R&D and testing and invested over $1.4$1.8 billion (including non-dilutive DOE grants) to date to develop its technology. Prior to forming our company in 2007, the DOE funded research from 2000 to 2003 to develop the fundamental concept for our SMR. Our current R&D efforts are centered on innovative plant operations and services, introducing new product innovations, improving plant quality and lowering the lifecycle cost of our NPMs and VOYGR plants. The R&D team is also involved in developing new innovative technologies that will represent future product offerings of NuScale, including steam compression and heating systems for industrial process heat, hydrogen production, storage and transport systems and advanced micro-reactor technologies.
Human Capital
As of December 31, 2022,2023, approximately 27% of our full-time employees are women and 14% belong to historically underrepresented groups. We have one female executive and one executive belongs to a historically underrepresented group in the science and technology sectors. NuScale is a signatory to the International Energy Agency Clean Energy Ministerial’s “Equal by 30 Campaign”, a public commitment to increase the number of women in the clean energy sector by 2030.
On January 8, 2024, NuScale announced a plan (the “Plan”) to reduce the Company’s workforce by 154 full time employees, or 28%. These strategic actions aligned resources with core priorities, which include advancing revenue-generating projects, securing new orders and positioning NuScale towards technology commercialization and long-term success.
After the Plan was initiated, we had 556had 398 full-time employees with an aggregate of 248156 advanced degrees, including 168129 master’s degrees in engineering and science and 2920 Ph.Ds. Twelve percent of our engineers are veterans. Our workforce is concentrated in the Portland and Corvallis, Oregon areas, but we have employees working in 39 states and the District of Columbia. We have a seasoned leadership team with over 250 years of cumulative experience in the nuclear industry. Our management team places significant focus and attention on matters concerning our human capital assets,assets, particularly our diversity, capability development and succession planning. Accordingly, we regularly review employee development and succession plans for each of our functions to identify and develop our pipeline of talent.
12
Information about our current Executive Officers and other Significant Employees
Name | Age | Position | |||||||||||||||
| John L. Hopkins | 70 | Chief Executive Officer, Director | |||||||||||||||
| José N. Reyes | 68 | Chief Technical Officer | |||||||||||||||
| 49 | Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||||||||||
| Carl Fisher | 62 | Chief Operating Officer | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Clayton Scott | 62 | Chief Commercial Officer | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Robert Temple | 67 | General Counsel and Corporate Secretary | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Scott Bailey | 62 | Vice President, Supply Chain | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Carl Britsch | 60 | Vice President, Human Resources | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Robert Gamble | 61 | Vice President, Engineering | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Karin Feldman | 46 | Vice President, Program Management | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Vice President, Regulatory Affairs | |||||||||||||||||||||||
John L. Hopkins has served as NuScale’s chief executive officer and on its board of directors since December 2012, and he served as its executive chairman from December 2012 to December 2021. Before that, Mr. Hopkins was with Fluor Corporation, one of the world’s largest publicly traded engineering, procurement, fabrication, construction and maintenance companies. Mr. Hopkins started his career at Fluor Corporation in 1989, held numerous leadership positions in both global operations and business development, and served as a corporate officer from 1999 until 2012. Mr. Hopkins is active in a variety of professional and business organizations, and currently serves on the Executive Committee, Audit Committee and Compensation Committee of the United States Chamber of Commerce, Washington, D.C.; he was formerly the Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the Executive Committee. Mr. Hopkins served with the DOE’s Nuclear Energy Advisory Committee from 2019 to 2020, and is currently a member of the Nuclear Energy Institute Executive Committee and Energy Task Force Member, Atlantic Council and the Group of Vienna. He was a senior energy policy advisor of I Squared Capital, New York. He has also served as the senior executive member of both the Fluor Netherlands and Fluor United Kingdom board of directors; chairman of the board for Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC; and as a director of the Business Council for International Understanding. Mr. Hopkins is qualified to serve as a director based on his knowledge of NuScale and its operations, his strategic relationships with NuScale partners, and his extensive experience in management and with the nuclear industry and with engineering and construction. Mr. Hopkins graduated with a B.B.A. from the University of Texas, Austin, and has completed several advanced management programs.
José N. Reyes, Ph.D., co-founded NuScale LLC and co-designed the NuScale passively-cooled small nuclear reactor. Dr. Reyes has served as our chief technology officer since 2007. Dr. Reyes is an internationally recognized expert on passive safety system design, testing and operations for nuclear power plants. He has served as a United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency technical expert on passive safety systems. He is a co-inventor on over 110 patents granted or pending in 20 countries. He has received several national awards including the 2013 Nuclear Energy Advocate Award, the 2014 American Nuclear Society Thermal Hydraulic Division Technical Achievement Award, the 2017 Nuclear Infrastructure Council Trailblazer Award, and the 2021 American Nuclear Society Walter H. Zinn Medal. He is a fellow of the American Nuclear Society and a member of the National Academy of Engineering. Dr. Reyes served as head of the OSUOregon State University (“OSU”) Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics from 2006-2009. He directed the Advanced Thermal Hydraulic Research Laboratory and was the co-director of the Battelle Energy Alliance Academic Center of Excellence for Thermal Fluids and Reactor Safety in support of the Idaho National Laboratory mission from 1994-2009. Additionally, Dr. Reyes was the OSU principal investigator for the AP600 and AP1000 design certification test programs sponsored by the NRC, the DOE and Westinghouse from 1990-2005. He currently serves as a Professor Emeritus in the School of Nuclear Science and Engineering.Engineering at OSU. He holds Ph.D. and Master of Science degrees in nuclear engineering from the University of Maryland, and a Bachelor of Science degree in nuclear engineering from the University of Florida. He is the author of numerous journal articles and technical reports, including a book chapter on SMRs for an ASME B&PVAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineering Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codes and Standards handbook. He has given lectures and keynote addresses to professional nuclear organizations in the United States, Europe and Asia.
13
Carl Fisher joined NuScale in July 2023 as Chief Operating Officer.Mr. Fisher leads the operations, engineering, project management, quality assurance, information technology, and regulatory affairs functions.Mr. Fisher began his career in the nuclear field in the United States Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program, where he was involved in naval nuclear reactor operations and managed instrumentation and control startup, operations, maintenance, and commissioning activities. He continued his nuclear industry career with Framatome from April 2003 to June 2023 in various management roles in Instrumentation & Control (I&C), Electrical Systems, Hardware and Product Modernizations, Engineering, and Customer Accounts & Government Affairs over a 20-year period.Most recently, Mr. Fisher was Vice President of Instrumentation & Control in North America, where he was responsible for the execution and delivery of I&C products and services to North American nuclear customers. During this time, the I&C Business Unit experienced tremendous growth as a Tier 1 supplier of both Safety and Operational Instrumentation and Controls equipment and services to nuclear facilities in the United States, Canada, and Mexico.Prior to that, Fisher led various Framatome business lines, which included Plant Engineering, NSSS Engineering, Electrical Products, Mechanical Products, Commercial Grade Dedication, Qualification & Testing, Inventory Management, the Nuclear Parts Center, Strategic Alliance for FLEX Emergency Response (SAFER), and Cyber Security.Prior to joining Framatome, Mr. Fisher’s global experience began in January 1990 to December 2022 with Duke Energy International in Hong Kong, where he managed energy commercial development efforts in Australia, China, Indonesia, Malaysia, New Zealand, Thailand, and the Philippines.Mr. Fisher holds a B.S.Bachelor of Science degree in mechanical engineering from North Carolina State University and a master’s degree in business administration from Queens University. He is actively engaged at the industry level and currently a member of the Institute of Nuclear Power Operation’s Supplier Participant Advisory Committee, as well as a member of the Nuclear Energy Institute Digital I&C Working Group. Fisher is also a certified Project Management Professional and a licensed Professional Engineer in North Carolina and South Carolina.
Clayton Scott joined NuScale on January 10, 2022 as Executive Vice President, Business Development before being promoted to Chief Commercial Officer in August 2023. He is responsible for the global sales, marketing and communications for NuScale. Mr. Scott brings more than 40 years of diverse global experiences allowing him the ability to open markets and raise brand awareness, in addition to having closed over $2.5 billion in sales globally. Prior to NuScale, from February 2018 to December 2021, Mr. Scott was a Senior Vice President — Global Sales, Deputy Director Instrument & Control (“I&C”) Business Unit for Framatome, responsible for the global I&C sales and P&L within the group. He led a global staff of more than 2,000 and drove new business at the ministry levels in Russia, China, Uzbekistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and others. Prior to Framatome, from January 2014 to February 2018 Mr. Scott served as the Chief Nuclear Officer for Schneider Electric, responsible for the company’s global nuclear organization, with offices and facilities in North America, Europe the Middle East and North Africa, and Asia. Before accepting this position with Schneider Electric, Mr. Scott served as the Chief Nuclear Officer of Invensys’s global nuclear business. He was appointed by the International Atomic Energy Agency (“IAEA”) to chair a taskforce on harmonizing digital licensing issues globally. He is a frequent lecturer on various topics within the energy sector. He is a member of the University of Tennessee Advisory Board. Mr. Scott was Chairman of Board for a newly created Framatome Company in South Korea. Mr. Scott carries dual citizenship in the United States and Canada. He has a Bachelor of Science degree in electrical engineering and a minor in computer science from the Massachusetts InstituteUniversity of Technology and an M.B.A.California, Irvine, Leading with Finance from the Walter A. HaasHarvard Business School online, and began his career as an instrumentation technologist for Ontario Hydro, where he was involved in commissioning and startup of Businessfour CANDU units at the Pickering Nuclear Power Station in Berkeley, CA. He is also a chartered financial analyst.Ontario, Canada.
Robert (Bob) Temple has served as general counsel and secretary of NuScale since 2016. Before NuScale, Mr. Temple served as general counsel and corporate secretary for Toshiba America Energy Systems Corporation (“TAES”TAES”) from 2015 to 2016, and as general counsel and corporate secretary for Toshiba America Nuclear Energy Corporation. Before joining TAES, Mr. Temple was assistant general counsel for The Babcock & Wilcox Company from 2010-2015, where he served as the chief legal advisor for Babcock & Wilcox Nuclear Energy, Inc. and Babcock & Wilcox mPower, Inc., as well as the general counsel and secretary for Generation mPower LLC. Mr. Temple joined Babcock & Wilcox in 2011 from the Washington, D.C. office of Haynes and Boone, LLP. During his career in private law practice, Mr. Temple worked as an associate, of counsel, or partner in the Chicago and Washington, D.C. offices of the law firms of Winston & Strawn, Hopkins & Sutter and McGuireWoods. Mr. Temple was Deputy General Counsel, vice president and secretary at CPS Energy from 2004 to 2009 and served as an in-house attorney with Commonwealth Edison (now Exelon) from 1995 to
14
1997. Before becoming an attorney, Mr. Temple was a licensed senior reactor operator at LaSalle County Station and served in the United States Navy aboard nuclear submarines. Mr. Temple received his J.D. from Illinois Institute of Technology’s Chicago-Kent College of Law (1995) and received his Bachelor of Science degree from Southern Illinois University (1988).
Scott Bailey has served as our vice president of Supply Chain since January 2011 and leads all aspects of NuScale’s supply chain function including internal procurement operations and supply chain development and manufacturing. Before joining NuScale, Mr. Bailey was the director of supply chain, nuclear generation, development and construction for the Tennessee Valley Authority (2009-2010). Mr. Bailey previously held senior supply chain management and consulting positions for NRG Energy (2007-2009), Sequoia Consulting Group (2004-2007), Pantellos (2001-2004) and Maine Yankee Atomic
Power Company (1986-2001). Mr. Bailey holds a master’s degree in business from Husson University (1991) and a B.S. in marine engineering from Maine Maritime Academy (1983).
Carl Britsch has served as NuScale’s vice president of Human Resources since 2015. Before NuScale, Mr. Britsch worked in human resources for a wide variety of industries including automotive, logistics, oilfield services and energy. Early in his career, Mr. Britsch spent nearly 10 years with Ford Motor Company including roles in two Ford Assembly plants and a role in the United Kingdom. Mr. Britsch has led the human resources functions for Loomis Armored, a global cash logistics company and two Houston-based oilfield services companies. Mr. Britsch has a master’s degree in government administration from the University of Pennsylvania and a J.D. and undergraduate degree from Brigham Young University.
Robert Gamble, Ph.D., has served as NuScale’s vice president of Engineering since 2016, and is responsible for design of the NuScale Structures, Systems and Components, Nuclear Safety Analysis, Fuels, Testing and Code Development, and Engineering Support Programs. Dr. Gamble led major portions of the international technology program and NRC pre-application review for GE’s Economic Simplified BWR Gen 3 light water reactor. Subsequently, he led design finalization and the DCA to the NRC. Before that, he worked on design and licensing activities on the GE Advance BWR and Simplified BWR light water reactors. Prior to working on light-water reactors, Dr. Gamble worked on the development of the sodium cooled advanced liquid metal reactor and super power reactor innovative small module fast reactors as well as the Lithium cooled SP-100 space reactor, developing key aspects of the thermal hydraulic systems and technology development infrastructure. As vice president of Mechanical Design and Analysis Group, Dr. Gamble and his staff were responsible for the design and analysis of reactor pressure vessels, internals and piping, structural and vibrations analysis, seismic and dynamic analysis, fracture mechanics, and emergent outage work including diagnoses, evaluation, repair and replacement of all vessel hardware of the global operating fleet of GE BWRs. Before NuScale LLC, Dr. Gamble served as the vice president of Engineering and general manager for North American Operations for Areva Solar from 2012 to 2016. Dr. Gamble received his PhD, M.S. and B.S. in mechanical engineering from UC Berkeley and is a graduate of the Harvard Business School Executive Management Training Program.
Karin Feldman has servedwas recently named senior vice president, Program Management Office after serving as NuScale’s vice president, Program Management Office since January 2019. She is responsible for leading NuScale’s project and program management and establishing and maintaining project management, project controls, cost estimating, and risk management standards. Before assuming this role, Ms. Feldman served as NuScale’s director of planning and integration (2016-2018) and the program management office risk manager (2012-2016). Before joining NuScale, from 2008 to 2012 Ms. Feldman was the chief executive officer of Zero Point Frontiers Corp. a small business start-up that provided technical and programmatic support to United States government and commercial space programs. Ms. Feldman started her career at The Aerospace Corporation (2000-2008), a federally-funded research and development center, where provided risk planning and assessment support for United States Air Force and NASA programs. Ms. Feldman holds a B.S. in nuclear engineering and radiological sciences from the University of Michigan and a master’s degree in nuclear engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
15
Nuclear Safety Regulation
The commercial nuclear industry is heavily regulated in all countries, and regulatory approval is required for the design, construction and operation of every nuclear plant. Generally, nuclear safety regulators consider (1) design safety and robustness against internal hazards (e.g., component failures and fires) and external hazards (e.g., earthquakes and weather loads such as snow, rain and wind), and (2) environmental impacts of construction and operations (e.g., water use and preservation of historical sites and animal and plant species). Regulation must be addressed on a country-by-country basis, although regulators often collaborate when a design is deployed in multiple countries.
Our licensing strategy has two goals: (1) obtain approval in the shortest possible time by engaging the regulator early and developing high quality applications; and (2) maintain a common design of the NPM in as many markets as possible by leveraging the highly regarded NRC Standard Design ApprovalSDA during each regulatory approval process.
Nuclear Safety Regulatory Approval in the United States
We submitted a Design Certification Application (“DCA”) in December 2016 to the NRC, comprising 12,000 pages, with approximately 2,000,000 pages of additional documentation and 100 gigabytes of test data. Development of the DCA required approximately $500 millionmillion in testing and engineering. Approval by the NRC included over 250,000 review hours at a cost of approximately $70 million. In addition to paying the NRC review fees, we incurred approximately $130 million in costs responding to numerous NRC requests for additional information, analyses and audits. Despite the intensity of the review, the NRC approved the NuScale design in 42 months—the fastest approval ever completed by the agency. We received the SDA for our 50 MWe NPM and VOYGR-12 plant design in August 2020, and our SMR design is currently the only SMR with such an approval. The NRC subsequently certified the design as Appendix G to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 52. No other SMR or non-light water nuclear vendor has applied to the NRC for a nuclear power reactor SDA.
We expect to obtain additional NRC approval of plant configurations desired by customers. For example, we have seen strong customer interest in the VOYGR-6.We completed an SDA application for this configuration at the end of 2022.The SDA application is currently under an acceptancewas accepted for review by NRC in July of 2023 and we expect that the acceptancecommitted to a 24-month review should be complete by mid-March 2023. The NRC review will focus its review of the SDA application on differences from the NRC-certified design. We expect NRC review time for the SDA reflecting the new configuration will be 24 months.schedule.
Customers that use our design will be able to incorporate an SDA into their license applications. The license application review can begin before the SDA application is approved. The NRC does not re-review the design in the SDA during the license application review; the review is limited to site specific design features (e.g., physical security systems, water intake structures), operational programs (e.g., maintenance, emergency preparedness) and environmental impacts. The ability to incorporate an SDA and provide only site specificsite-specific information to file a license application is an improved licensing process developed by the NRC and industry, and has been used by all new reactor designs and license applications since the early 1990s. This process, known as Part 52, substantially reduced regulatory and financial risk for license applicants compared to the older process, known as Part 50. As the only SMR vendor using Part 52 to date, NuScale has a competitive advantage and that makes our SMR attractive to potential customers.
Nuclear Safety Regulatory Approval Internationally
Generally speaking, most countries limit license applications to the proposed owner and/or operator of nuclear power plants. Where appropriate in support of a customer or at the request of the regulator, we intend to engage early with regulators in each country of interest, consistent with our approach in the U.S.
The NRC has bilateral relationships with many other countries and participates in several international support organizations, including the International Atomic Energy Agency (“IAEA”), the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Nuclear Regulators Association. We expect NRC approval will benefit our ability to obtain regulatory approvals internationally and will give foreign regulators confidence that the NuScale design is safe. We also expect to benefit from the NRC’s regulatory assistance program, through which the NRC collaborates with other countries’ regulators to understand the basis for the NRC approval of our design.
NuScale is also engaging directly with the IAEA to facilitate regulatory approval abroad. The IAEA, while not a regulator, is important because many countries’ regulatory frameworks were developed from IAEA standards, which are somewhat
16
different from the NRC framework. We plan to initiate in 2023 a Technical Safety Review of Design Safety (TSR-D5) with the IAEA.IAEA in 2024. The purpose of a TSR-DS is to review the design safety of a nuclear power plant against the IAEA safety standards. The TSR-DS will evaluate the NuScale VOYGR-6 design information along with three supplemental reports against the IAEA safety requirements. The purpose of the review is to identify strengths and potential weaknesses of the safety case to expedite licensing in countries that employ IAEA safety guidelines.
In addition, we have had significant interaction with safety regulators and energy ministries in many of the countries where there is significant customer interest. For example: we have worked through material parts of the Vendor Design Review process with the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission; we have completed a technology assessment conducted by the Office of Nuclear Regulation in the U.K.; we are working throughcompleted a licensing gap analysis (comparing select local, IAEA and Western European Nuclear Regulators’ Association requirements against the NuScale design) with the State Nuclear Regulatory Inspectorate in Ukraine; and we have performed analysis of NuScale plant safety, economy and maneuverability under a study funded by Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry.
Other Regulation
In addition to nuclear safety regulation, NuScale is subject to other nuclear regulatory controls such as export control, nuclear material safeguards and non-proliferation restrictions and liability insurance regimes (e.g., Price-Andersen Act, the 1960 Paris Convention, the 1963 Vienna Convention, and the 1997 Convention on Supplementary Compensation). NuScale plans to sell its plants only in jurisdictions where nuclear liability is exclusively channeled to the plant operator.
Customers purchasing NuScale plants also must obtain required permits, licenses and insurance for the jurisdiction where the facility will be located. In the U.S.,United States, a NuScale plant developer must obtain an NRC construction permit and an NRC operating license issued pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50 or a combined license issued pursuant to 10 CFR Part 52. Other U.S. federal permits or licenses for a NuScale plant may include a Section 404 Dredge & Fill Permit issued by the Army Corp. of Engineers; a Federal Aviation Administration § 77.15 Permit; a Certificate of Registration issued by the U.S. Department of Transportation; and a Spills Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan mandated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. State or local regulators may also require permits or licenses for a NuScale plant, including a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Activities and to Construct a Sanitary Wastewater, Wastewater Treatment facility; Section 401 Water Quality Certification; Well Permits; Solid Waste Handling Permit; and appropriate building permits.
Export Controls
NuScale’s business is subject to, and complies with, stringent U.S. import and export control laws, including the Export Administration Regulations (EAR)(“EAR”) from the Bureau of Industry and Security which is part of the U.S. Department of Commerce, and regulations issued by the DOE. The regulations exist to advance the national security and foreign policy interests of the U.S.United States and to further its nonproliferation policies. Nuclear technology, also known as technical data, is controlled by 10 CFR Part 810, under the regulations of the DOE. Nuclear hardware and codes specifically designed or modified for use in a nuclear reactor are controlled by the NRC under 10 CFR Part 110.
The U.S. government agencies responsible for administering the EAR and other export control regulations have a degree of discretion interpreting and enforcing these regulations. These agencies also have significant discretion in approving, denying or instituting specific conditions regarding authorizations to engage in controlled activities. Such decisions are influenced by the U.S. government’s commitments to multilateral export control regimes, particularly the Nuclear Suppliers Group, a group of nuclear supplier countries that seek to prevent nuclear proliferation by controlling the export of materials, equipment and technology that can be used to manufacture nuclear weapons.
Many different types of internal controls and measures are required to ensure compliance with such export control regulations. For example, 10 CFR Part 810, Appendix A provides a list of countries that are considered Generally Authorized, meaning they are considered to be non-sensitive. Countries not on this list are required to be specifically authorized prior to sharing any nuclear technology. Under Part 110, the NRC regulates the export or import of nuclear hardware, material and code, following similar protocols with respect to the same sensitive countries vs. non sensitive countries regulatory structure embedded in 10 CFR Part 810.
Available Information
17
Our website address is www.nuscalepower.com. You may obtain free electronic copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports on the “Investor” portion of our website, under the heading “SEC Filings” filed under “Financials.” These reports are available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with, or furnish them to, the SEC. These reports, and any amendments to them, are also available at the Internet website of the SEC, http://www.sec.gov. We also maintain various documents related to our corporate governance including our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board Committee Charters and our Code of Business Ethics Program filed under “Governance.” The information found on the website is not part of, or incorporated by reference into, this or any other report we file with, or furnish to, the SEC.
18
Item 1A. Risk Factors
We have identified the following risks and uncertainties that may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or reputation. The risks described below are not the only risks we face. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently believe are not material may also significantly affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or reputation. Our business could be harmed by any of these risks. In assessing these risks, you should also refer to the financial statements and related notes contained in this report.
We may face additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known to us, or that we currently deem immaterial, which may also impair our business or financial condition. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of NuScale and notes to the financial statements included in this report.
Risks Related to Our Structure and Governance
NuScale Corp is a holding company and its only material asset is its interest in NuScale LLC, and it is accordingly dependent upon distributions made by its subsidiaries to pay taxes, make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement and pay dividends and fees associated with being a public company such as director retainers, NYSE and other regulatory filings.
NuScale Corp is a holding company with no material assets other than its ownership of the NuScale LLC units. As a result, NuScale Corp has no independent means of generating revenue or cash flow. NuScale Corp’s ability to pay taxes, cause NuScale LLC to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement and pay dividends depends on the financial results and cash flows of NuScale LLC and the distributions it receives (directly or indirectly) from NuScale LLC. Deterioration in the financial condition, earnings or cash flow of NuScale LLC for any reason could limit or impair its ability to pay such distributions. Additionally, to the extent that NuScale Corp needs funds and NuScale LLC is restricted from making such distributions under applicable law or regulation or under the terms of any financing arrangements, or NuScale LLC is otherwise unable to provide such funds, it could materially adversely affect NuScale Corp’s liquidity and financial condition.
NuScale LLC is treated as a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes and, as such, generally will not be subject to any entity-level United States federal income tax. Instead, taxable income will be allocated to holders of NuScale LLC units. Accordingly, NuScale Corp will be required to pay income taxes on its allocable share of any net taxable income from NuScale LLC. Under the terms of the Sixth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of NuScale LLC (the “A&R NuScale LLC Agreement”), NuScale LLC is obligated to make tax distributions to holders of NuScale LLC units calculated at certain assumed tax rates. In addition to income taxes, NuScale Corp is also expected to incur expenses related to its operations, including payment obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement, which could be significant, and some of which will be reimbursed by NuScale LLC (excluding payment obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement). NuScale Corp intends to cause NuScale LLC to make ordinary distributions and tax distributions to holders of NuScale LLC units on a pro rata basis in amounts sufficient to cover all applicable taxes, relevant operating expenses, payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement and dividends, if any, declared by NuScale Corp. However, as discussed above, NuScale LLC’s ability to make such distributions may be subject to various limitations and restrictions, including, but not limited to, retention of amounts necessary to satisfy the obligations of NuScale LLC and restrictions on distributions that would violate any applicable restrictions contained in NuScale LLC’s debt agreements, if any, or any applicable law or that would have the effect of rendering NuScale LLC insolvent. To the extent that NuScale Corp is unable to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement for any reason, such payments will be deferred and will accrue interest until paid; provided, however, that nonpayment for a specified period may constitute a breach of a material obligation under the Tax Receivable Agreement and therefore accelerate payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, which could be substantial.
Additionally, although NuScale LLC generally will not be subject to any entity-level United States federal income tax, it may be liable under recent United States federal tax legislation for adjustments to prior year tax returns, absent an election to the contrary. In the event NuScale LLC’s calculations of taxable income are incorrect, NuScale LLC and its members, including NuScale Corp, in later years may be subject to material liabilities pursuant to this legislation and its related guidance.
19
If NuScale LLC were treated as a corporation for United States federal income tax or state tax purposes, then the amount available for distribution by NuScale LLC could be substantially reduced and the value of NuScale Corp shares could be adversely affected.
An entity that would otherwise be classified as a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes (such as NuScale LLC) may nonetheless be treated as, and taxable as, a corporation if it is a “publicly traded partnership” unless an exception to such treatment applies. An entity that would otherwise be classified as a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes will be treated as a “publicly traded partnership” if interests in such entity are traded on an established securities market or interests in such entity are readily tradable on a secondary market or the substantial equivalent thereof. If NuScale LLC iswere determined to be treated as a “publicly traded partnership” (and taxable as a corporation) for United States federal income tax purposes, it would be taxable on its income at the United States federal income tax rates applicable to corporations and distributions by NuScale LLC to its partners (including NuScale Corp) could be taxable as dividends to such partners to the extent of the earnings and profits of NuScale LLC. In addition, weNuScale Corp would no longer have the benefit of increases in the tax basis of NuScale LLC’s assets as a result of exchanges of NuScale LLC Class B units. Pursuant to the A&R NuScale LLC Agreement, certain Legacy NuScale Equityholders may, from time to time, subject to the terms of the A&R NuScale LLC Agreement, exchange their interests in NuScale LLC and have such interests redeemed by NuScale LLC for cash or shares of Class A common stock. While such exchanges could be treated as trading in the interests of NuScale LLC for purposes of testing “publicly traded partnership” status, the A&R NuScale LLC Agreement contains restrictions on redemptions and exchanges of interests in NuScale LLC that are intended to prevent NuScale LLC entities from being treated as a “publicly traded partnership” for United States federal income tax purposes. Such restrictions are designed to comply with certain safe harbors provided for under applicable United States federal income tax law. NuScale Corp may also impose additional restrictions on exchanges that it determines to be necessary or advisable so that NuScale LLC is not treated as a “publicly traded partnership” for United States federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, while such position is not free from doubt, NuScale LLC is expected to be operated such that it is not treated as a “publicly traded partnership” taxable as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes and we intend to take the position that NuScale LLC is so treated as a result of exchanges of its interests (i.e., LLC Class B common units exchanged tofor Class B units and Class BA common shares) pursuant to the A&R NuScale LLC Agreement. If NuScale LLC were treated as a “publicly traded partnership” taxable as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes, it could have a material adverse impact on NuScale Corp’s liquidity and financial condition as a result of the additional corporate tax payable at the NuScale LLC level.
Pursuant to the Tax Receivable Agreement, NuScale Corp will be required to pay to certain Legacy NuScale Equityholders 85% of certain tax benefits, if any, that it realizes (or in certain cases is deemed to realize) as a result of any increases in tax basis and related tax benefits resulting from any exchange of NuScale LLC Class B units for shares of Class A common stock or cash in the future, and those payments may be substantial.
The Legacy NuScale Equityholders may in the future exchange their NuScale LLC Class B units for shares of Class A common stock (or, upon the election of NuScale Corp, cash in an amount equal to the net proceeds raised by selling such shares of Class A common stock in a contemporaneous underwritten offering), subject to certain restrictions. Such transactions are expected to result in increases in NuScale Corp’s share of the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of NuScale LLC. These increases in tax basis may result in increased tax depreciation and amortization deductions and therefore reduce the amount of income or franchise tax that NuScale Corp would otherwise be required to pay in the future had such sales and exchanges never occurred.
NuScale Corp is party to the Tax Receivable Agreement with NuScale LLC, each of the TRA Holders (as defined in the Tax Receivable Agreement) party thereto and Fluor, in its capacity as TRA Representative (as defined in the Tax Receivable Agreement). Pursuant to the Tax Receivable Agreement, NuScale Corp will be required to pay 85% of the net cash tax savings from certain tax benefits, if any, that it realizes (or in certain cases is deemed to realize) as a result of any increases in tax basis and other tax benefits resulting from any exchange by the TRA Holders of NuScale LLC Class B units for shares of Class A common stock or cash in the future. Any such payments to TRA Holders will reduce the cash provided by the tax savings generated from future exchanges that would otherwise have been available to NuScale Corp for other uses, including reinvestment or dividends to Class A stockholders. Cash tax savings from the remaining 15% of the tax benefits will be retained by NuScale Corp. NuScale Corp’s obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement accelerate upon a change in control and certain other termination events, as defined therein. These payments are the obligation of NuScale Corp and not of NuScale LLC. The actual increase in NuScale Corp’s allocable share of NuScale LLC’s tax basis in its assets, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the timing of exchanges, the market price of the shares of Class A common stock at the time of the exchange, the extent to which such exchanges are taxable and the amount and timing of the recognition of
20
NuScale Corp’s income. While many of the factors that will determine the amount of payments that NuScale Corp will make under the Tax Receivable Agreement are outside of its control, NuScale Corp expects that the payments it will make under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be substantial and could have a material adverse effect on NuScale Corp’s
financial condition. Any payments made by NuScale Corp under the Tax Receivable Agreement will generally reduce the amount of overall cash flow that might have otherwise been available to NuScale Corp. To the extent that NuScale Corp is unable to make timely payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement for any reason, the unpaid amounts will be deferred and will accrue interest until paid; however, nonpayment for a specified period may constitute a material breach of a material obligation under the Tax Receivable Agreement and therefore accelerate payments due under the Tax Receivable Agreement. Furthermore, NuScale Corp’s future obligation to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement could make it a less attractive target for an acquisition, particularly in the case of an acquirer that cannot use some or all of the tax benefits that may be deemed realized under the Tax Receivable Agreement.
In certain cases, payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement may exceed the actual tax benefits NuScale Corp realizes.
Payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be based on the tax reporting positions that NuScale Corp determines, and the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or another taxing authority may challenge all or any part of the tax basis increases, as well as other tax positions that NuScale Corp takes, and a court may sustain such a challenge. In the event that any tax benefits initially claimed by NuScale Corp are disallowed, the Legacy NuScale Equityholders will not be required to reimburse NuScale Corp for any excess payments that may previously have been made under the Tax Receivable Agreement, for example, due to adjustments resulting from examinations by taxing authorities. Rather, excess payments made to such holders will be netted against any future cash payments otherwise required to be made by NuScale Corp under the Tax Receivable Agreement, if any, after the determination of such excess. However, a challenge to any tax benefits initially claimed by NuScale Corp may not arise for a number of years following the initial time of such payment or, even if challenged early, such excess cash payment may be greater than the amount of future cash payments that NuScale Corp might otherwise be required to make under the terms of the Tax Receivable Agreement and, as a result, there might not be future cash payments against which to net. As a result, in certain circumstances NuScale Corp could make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement in excess of NuScale Corp’s actual income tax savings, which could materially impair NuScale Corp’s financial condition.
Moreover, the Tax Receivable Agreement provides that, in certain events, including a change of control, breach of a material obligation under the Tax Receivable Agreement, or NuScale Corp exercise of early termination rights, NuScale Corp obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement will accelerate and NuScale Corp will be required to make a lump-sum cash payment to the Legacy NuScale Equityholders party to the Tax Receivable Agreement equal to the present value of all forecasted future payments that would have otherwise been made under the Tax Receivable Agreement, which lump-sum payment would be based on certain assumptions, including those relating to NuScale Corp future taxable income. The lump-sum payment could be substantial and could exceed the actual tax benefits that NuScale Corp realizes subsequent to such payment because such payment would be calculated assuming, among other things, that NuScale Corp would have certain tax benefits available to it and that NuScale Corp would be able to use the potential tax benefits in future years.
There may be a material negative effect on NuScale Corp’s liquidity if the payments required to be made by NuScale Corp under the Tax Receivable Agreement exceed the actual income or franchise tax savings that NuScale Corp realizes. Furthermore, NuScale Corp’s obligations to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement could also have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control.
We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of NYSE rules and, as a result, qualify for exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements, and our stockholders do not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to such requirements.
Fluor owns a majority of the voting power of our common stock. As a result, we are a “controlled company” under the NYSE rules. As a controlled company, we are exempt from certain corporate governance requirements, including those that would otherwise require our board of directors to have a majority of independent directors and require that we either establish compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees, each comprised entirely of independent directors, or otherwise ensure that the compensation of our executive officers and nominees of directors are determined or recommended to our board of directors by independent members of our board of directors. To the extent we rely on one or more of these exemptions, our stockholders will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance requirements.
21
We are an emerging growth company (“EGC”) within the meaning of the Securities Act, and if we take advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to “emerging growth companies”, this could make our
securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies.
We are an EGC within the meaning of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not EGCs including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. As a result, our stockholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. We could be an EGC until December 31, 2025, although circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier, including if the market value of common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700,000,000 as of any June 30 before that time, in which case we would no longer be an EGC as of the following December 31. We cannot predict whether investors will find our securities less attractive because we rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result of our reliance on these exemptions, the trading prices of our securities may be lower than they otherwise would be, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the trading prices of our securities may be more volatile.
Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts EGCs from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-EGCs but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. We intend to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period.
Risks Related to NuScale’s Business and Industry
Commercialization Risk Factors
We have not yet commercialized or sold NPMs, and a number of factors could prevent, delay or hinder commercialization.
We have not yet entered into a binding contract with a customer to deliver NPMs, and there is no guarantee that we will be able to do so.
The planned initial deployment of our NPM is subject to NuScale reaching a binding agreement for its scope of supply with Utah Associated Municipal Power SystemsRoPower Nuclear S.A. (“UAMPS”RoPower”) and UAMPSNuScale reaching a binding engineering, procurement, and construction (“EPC”) contract with Fluor. If NuScale and Fluor dodoes not enter into binding agreements with UAMPS,RoPower or Fluor, initial deployment of our NPM, power plants, and ongoing services could be significantly delayed, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. Memoranda of understanding we have entered into with other potential purchaserscustomers are contingent and may not result in binding agreements for the purchase of our products or services. Discussions are under way with other potential NuScale customers, but NuScale has yet to secure an NPM order from them.
Competitors in China and Russia currently operate commercial SMRs and may have advantages in marketing their SMRs to potential customers.
Competitors in Russia and China, such as Rosatom and China National Nuclear Corporation, currently operate commercial SMRs in those countries. Although their SMR designs have not been approved by the NRC or in any jurisdiction outside of their native countries, those competitors may have a competitive advantage if they are able to obtain approval comparable to Standard Design Approval (“SDA”),the NRC’s SDA, or if they can otherwise demonstrate to potential customers the value and benefits of their SMRs, particularly in jurisdictions that have less stringent regulatory requirements. In addition, these competitors may have access to greater government or other funding to develop and commercialize their SMRs than we do.
22
When we reimbursed these costs and terminated the LLM Agreement, relateswe were entitled to the long-lead materials that are incorporated into the NPMs (the “LLM”). The amended DCRA changed the Company’s potential refund obligations to UAMPS described above, if at specified times in the development of the CFPP, the estimated cost of electricity (based on increasingly accurate project cost estimates at various stages of development) exceeds an agreed target cost of $89.00/megawatt-hour (subject to adjustment as specified in the DCRA). In addition, the Company may be obligated to refund to UAMPS a percentage of its net development costs if CFPP does not secure a total of 370 MWe of committed subscription obligation (the committed level of subscription as of February 28, 2023 was 120 MWe). Through the end of 2023, the Company may have to retain up to $81.0 million in restricted cash on our consolidated balance sheet to act as collateral for a letter of credit of similar value by December 31, 2023. Pursuant to the Amendment, the reimbursement obligations are now divided between the DCRA and the LLM Agreement such that (a) the aggregate cap for failure of an economic competitive test before final notice to proceed with NuScale plant construction is the amounts paidpurchased under the LLM Agreement, which may amount to an estimated $66 million plus $60 millionAgreement; however, because the Company is still in discussion with DOE regarding the means and timing for lifting a DOE lien on the long-lead materials (stemming from DOE’s funding under its cost share agreement with CFPP LLC), the DCRA; and (b) the cap for terminationvalue of the DCRA for cause is $120 million under the DCRA and the amounts paidlong-lead materials may be significantly lower than reimbursement costs under the LLM Agreement, which may amount to $50 million through delivery of a “Class 2” project cost estimate (an estimate that is accurate within -15% to +20%) and thereafter $180 million plus the amounts paid under the LLM Agreement, which may amount to an estimated $66 million through the final notice to proceed, which requires a “Class 1” project cost estimate (an estimate that is accurate within -10% to +15%). Should the Company be compelled to make the refund described above, the Company will have rights to the LLM free of any liens by UAMPS or CFPP. The Company is in discussions with DOE and CFPP LLC regarding the rights the Company may have to use the LLM for a project at the CFPP site or for another customer. The CompanyAgreement. We may have to pay costs to DOE (in addition to the refund to CFPP LLC) to obtain the LLMlong-lead materials free of DOE liens from DOEin order to use the LLMlong-lead materials for a project at the CFPP site or for another customer. Until the Company formalizes an agreement with DOE and CFPP LLC regarding disposition of the long-lead materials, there is no guarantee we will be able to use such materials in another project.
Any delays in the development and manufacture of NPMs and related technology may adversely impact our business and financial condition.
We have previously experienced, and may experience in the future, delays or other complications in the design, manufacture, production and delivery of NPMs and related technology that could prevent us from delivering NPMs in 2028 or beyond. If delays like this recur, if our remediation measures and process changes doare not continue to be successful, if we fail to find a satisfactory manufacturer or if we experience issues with planned manufacturing activities or design and safety, we could experience issues or delays in sustaining or further increasing production and sales of NPMs.
If we encounter difficulties in scaling our production and delivery capabilities, if we fail to develop and successfully commercialize our NPMs and related technologies, if we fail to develop such technologies before our competitors or if such technologies fail to perform as expected, are inferior to those of our competitors or are perceived as less safe than those of our competitors, our business and financial condition could be materially and adversely impacted.
We have not yet delivered NPMs to customers, and any setbacks we may experience during our first commercial delivery and other demonstration and commercial missions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation, and could harm our reputation.
The success of our business will depend on our ability to successfully deliver NPMs to customers on-time and on-budget at guaranteed performance levels, which would tend to establish greater confidence in our subsequent customers. This means manufacturing all components to specification (satisfying quality inspection criteria) and delivering those components to the CFPPRoPower site on schedule and without delay or incident. There is no guarantee that our planned NPM deployments will be successful. There can be no assurance that we will not experience operational or process failures and other problems during our first commercial deployment or any planned deployment thereafter. Any failures or setbacks, particularly on our first commercial deployments, could harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Any actual or perceived safety or reliability issues may result in significant reputational harm to our businesses, in addition to tortlegal liability and other costs that may arise. Such issues could result in delaying or cancelling planned deployments of NPMs, increased regulation, or other adverse systemic consequences. Our inability to meet our safety standards or adverse publicity affecting our reputation as a result of accidents or mechanical failures could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
We have incurred significant losses since inception, we expect to incur losses in the future, and we may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability.
We have incurred significant losses since our inception well beyond the support we have received through cost-sharing awards from the DOE. We have not yet delivered NPMs orto customers and none of our flagship plants, named VOYGR, to customers,have been permitted or are under construction, and it is difficult for us to predict our future operating results. As a result, our losses may be larger than anticipated, and we may not achieve profitability when expected or at all; even if we do, we may not be able to maintain or increase profitability.
23
We expect our operating expenses to increase over the next several years as we commence deployment of NPMs, continue to refine and streamline our design and manufacturing processes for our NPMs, make technical improvements, hire additional employees and continue research and development efforts relating to new products and technologies. These efforts may be more costly than we expect and may not result in increased revenue, profits or growth in our business. Any failure to increase our revenue sufficiently to keep pace with our expenses could prevent us from achieving or maintaining profitability or positive cash flow. Furthermore, if our future growth and operating performance fail to meet investor or analyst expectations, or if we have future negative cash flow or losses resulting from our investment in acquiring customers or expanding our operations, this could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
The cost of electricity generated from nuclear sources or our NPMs may not be cost competitive with other electricity generation sources in some markets, which could materially and adversely affect our business.
Some electricity markets experience very low power prices due to a combination of subsidized renewables and low-cost fuel sources, and NuScale may not be able to compete in these markets unless the benefits of the carbon-free, reliable and/or resilient energy generation provided by our NPMs are sufficiently valued in the market. Given the relatively lower electricity prices in the United States when compared to many international markets, the risk may be greater with respect to business in the United States. Inflation may also increase the cost of our NPMs to a point where the LCOE of electricity generated from a NuScale Plant is not competitive with the alternatives.
The market for SMRs generating nuclear power is not yet established and may not achieve the growth potential we expect or may grow more slowly than expected.
The market for SMRs has not yet been established. Our estimates for the total addressable market are based on a number of internal and third-party estimates, including our potential contracted revenue, the number of potential customers who have expressed interest in our NPMs, assumed prices and production costs for our NPMs, our ability to leverage our current logistical and operational processes, and general market conditions. However, our assumptions and the data underlying our
estimates may not be correct and the conditions supporting our assumptions or estimates may change at any time, thereby reducing the predictive accuracy of these underlying factors. As a result, our estimates of the annual total addressable market for our services, as well as the expected growth rate for the total addressable market for our services, may prove to be incorrect.
Our commercialization strategy relies heavily on our relationship with Fluor and other strategic investors and partners, who may have interests that diverge from ours and who may not be easily replaced if our relationships terminate.
We rely heavily upon our relationship with Fluor, our majority owner, and our relationships with other of our investors and strategic partners to commercialize our NPM and our other products and services. We granted Fluor certain rights to provide engineering, procurement and construction services in connection with NuScale’s general plant design, project-specific designs and services typically performed by Fluor or its direct competitors. Similarly, we have entered into certain agreements with Doosan Heavy Industries and Construction Company, Ltd., IHI Corporation, and Sarens Nuclear & Industrial Services, LLC for certain planning, engineering, manufacturing and support activities, and JGC Holdings Corporation, an affiliate of Japan NuScale Innovation, LLC, related to the EPC and commissioning of the first NuScale plant, in the United States and in other specific geographic areas, and with Samsung C&T Corporation related to certain EPC activities.activities; and with GS Energy with respect to project development in certain markets.
Our strategic partners may have interests that diverge from our interests, and which may hinder our ability to negotiate sales to customers. If we lose our agreements with strategic partners, we may need to find new contractors who may have less experience designing and building nuclear plants. This could substantially hinder our ability to expand our production capacity and installation of VOYGR plants and could affect our business and our prospects.
We may be unable to manage our future growth effectively, which could make it difficult to execute our business strategy.
If our operations grow as planned, we may need to expand our sales and marketing, research and development, supply and manufacturing functions, and there is no guarantee that we will be able to scale the business and the manufacture of NPMs as planned, as there is no guarantee that we will be able to find suitable locations or partners for the expanded manufacture and operation of our NPMs or to broaden our internal capabilities.
24
Any failure to effectively incorporate updates to the design, construction and operations of NuScale plants to ensure cost competitiveness could reduce the marketability of the NuScale design and has the potential to impact deployment schedules.
Updating the design, construction, and operations of NuScale plants will be necessary to their competitiveness and attractiveness in the market, particularly in the United States where the price of power is generally lower than in other countries. If we are not able to achieve and maintain cost-competitiveness in the United States or elsewhere, our business could be materially and adversely affected.
If manufacturing and construction issues are not identified prior to design finalization, long-lead procurement, and/or module fabrication, then those issues will be realized during production, fabrication, or construction and may impact plant deployment cost and schedule.
Our NPM design will be actively managed through design reviews, prototyping, involvement of external partners and application of industry lessons, but we could still fail to identify latent manufacturing and construction issues early enough to avoid negative effects on production, fabrication, construction or ultimate performance of our NPMs or plants. Where these issues arise at such later stages of deployment, plant deployment could be subject to greater costs or be significantly delayed, which could materially and adversely affect our business.
We and our customers operate in a politically sensitive environment, and the public perception of nuclear energy can affect our customers and us.
The risks associated with radioactive materials and the public perception of those risks can affect our business. Opposition by third parties can delay or prevent the construction of new nuclear power plants and can limit the operation of nuclear reactors. Adverse public reaction to developments in the use of nuclear power could directly affect our customers and indirectly affect our business. In the past, adverse public reaction, increased regulatory scrutiny and litigation have contributed to extended construction periods for new nuclear reactors, sometimes delaying construction schedules by
decades or more or even shutting down operations. In addition, anti-nuclear groups in Germany successfully lobbied for the adoption of the Nuclear Exit Law in 2002, under which requires the shutdown of all Germanremaining nuclear power plants by the end ofin Germany were shut down in April 2023. Adverse public reaction could also lead to increased regulation or limitations on the activities of our customers, more onerous operating requirements or other conditions that could have a material adverse impact on our customers and our business.
Accidents involving nuclear power facilities, including but not limited to events similar to the Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accidents, or terrorist acts or other high-profile events involving radioactive materials, could materially and adversely affect our customers and the markets in which we operate and increase regulatory requirements and costs that could materially and adversely affect our business.
Our future prospects are dependent upon a certain level of public support for nuclear power. Nuclear power faces strong opposition from certain competitive energy sources, individuals and organizations. The accident that occurred at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan in 2011 increased public opposition to nuclear power in some countries, resulting in a slowdown in, or, in some cases, a complete halt to new construction of nuclear power plants, an early shut down of existing power plants or a dampening of the favorable regulatory climate needed to introduce new nuclear technologies, all of which could negatively impact our business and prospects. As a result of the Fukushima accident, some countries that were considering launching new domestic nuclear power programs delayed or cancelled the preparatory activities they were planning to undertake as part of such programs. If accidents similar to the Fukushima disaster or other events, such as terrorist attacks involving nuclear facilities, occur, public opposition to nuclear power may increase, regulatory requirements and costs could become more onerous and customer demand for our NPMs could suffer, which could materially and adversely affect our business and operations.
Our supply base may not be able to scale to the production levels necessary to meet sales projections.
NuScale does not have manufacturing assets and relies on third party manufacturers to build our NPMs and associated equipment. Moreover, we are dependent on future supplier capability to meet production demands attendant to our forecasts. If our supply chain cannot meet the schedule demands of the market, our projected sales revenues could be materially impacted.
25
Lack of availability and cost of component raw materials may affect the manufacturing processes for plant equipment and increase our costs.
Recent global supply chain disruptions have increasinglynegatively affected both the availability and cost of raw materials, component manufacturing and deliveries. TheseSuch disruptions may result in delays in equipment deliveries and cost escalations that could adversely affect our business.
We are highly dependent on our senior management team and other highly skilled personnel, and if we are not successful in attracting or retaining highly qualified personnel, we may not be able to successfully implement our business strategy.
Our success depends, in significant part, on the continued services of our senior management team and on our ability to attract, motivate, develop and retain a sufficient number of other highly skilled personnel, including engineers, manufacturing and quality assurance, finance, marketing and sales personnel. Our senior management team has extensive experience in the energy and manufacturing industries, and we believe that their depth of experience is instrumental to our continued success. The loss of any one or more members of our senior management team, for any reason, including resignation or retirement, could impair our ability to execute our business strategy and have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition if we are unable to successfully attract and retain qualified and highly skilled replacement personnel.
We mayexpect we will require additional future funding.
To date, we have not generated any material revenue, while we have substantial overhead expenses. We do not expect to generate meaningful revenue unless and until we are able to finalize development of and commercialize our SMR technology and related services, and we may not be able to do so on our anticipated timetable, if at all. WeUnder the Release Agreement, we have paid $49.8 million to CFPP LLC, subject to adjustment, and we may incur additional expenses relating to winding down work on the Carbon Free Power Project. These payments have materially and adversely affected our financial condition. Although we instituted the Plan in January 2024 to reduce our cost base and focus resources on key strategic areas, in the long term we expect our expenses and capital expenditures to increase in connection with our ongoing activities, including developing and advancing our SMR and other products and services, obtaining further NRC design certifications of and SDAs for our SMR and completing our manufacturing preparation and trials. We also incur additional costs associated with operating as
a public company. Certain costs are not reasonably estimable at this time, and we may require additional funding and our projections anticipate certain customer-sourced income that is not guaranteed. This is particularly true in light of the termination of our agreements with CFPP LLC. Consequently, we expect we will require additional future funding.
We may seek to raise capital through private or public equity or debt financings or through other sources of financing. Adequate additional funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. Our failure to raise capital as and when needed could have a negative impact on our financial condition and our ability to pursue our business strategies. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our stockholders will experience dilution. If we raise additional capital through debt financing, we may be subject to covenants that restrict our operations including limitations on our ability to incur liens or additional debt, pay dividends, repurchase our securities, make certain investments, and engage in certain merger, consolidation or asset sale transactions. Any debt financing or additional equity that we raise may contain terms that are not favorable to us or our stockholders and members. If the needed financing is not available, or if the terms of financing are less desirable than we expect, we may be required to delay, scale back or terminate some or all of our research and development programs.
Our funding plan relies on cost-shared funding provided through a cooperative agreement with the DOE. Significant funding has been received from the DOE under four separate cost-share awards granted since 2013. As of March 1,December 31, 2023, the DOE had obligated $248 million to the current award; of which $225 million was collected from the DOE through December 31, 2022. The overall DOE contribution to NuScale LLC commercialization funding is more than $548$548.0 million. The current DOE award is a $700$657.3 million award ($350262.7 million in government funding to be matched by $350$394.6 million in private funding). We have proposed to reviseDOE has fully obligated the preceding to $657 million ($328.5 million incurrently authorized government funding.Additional funding to be matched by $328.5 million in private funding). Funding is subject to at least annual Congressional appropriations, which may not be forthcoming.forthcoming, and DOE approval of an increase in federal funding levels. President Biden’s 20242025 fiscal year budget proposal to Congress for advanced SMR research and development has not been submitted. The federal budget process is complex—the budget justification and Presidential budget requests are often incomplete; Congress may appropriate different amounts than those requested; and the DOE has varying degrees of discretion to reprogram or transfer appropriated funds. Nonetheless, to the extent Presidential budget requests or DOE budget justifications result in a shift of Congressional appropriations away from SMR funding generally or projects we are developing specifically, those shifts could materially and adversely affect the amount of DOE funding available to us and
26
our business. NuScale and CFPP areis requesting a fiscal year 20242025 appropriation of $418 million for advanced SMR research and development, however, the entirety of the appropriations requested for the 20232024 fiscal year was not fulfilled.
If we are unable to continue as a going concern, we may be forced to liquidate our assets and the values we receive for our assets in liquidation or dissolution could be significantly lower than the values reflected in our financial statements.
As part of our arrangements with the DOE, we granted the DOE a worldwide, nonexclusive, paid-up license to our intellectual property and to manufacture our SMR technology, and the right to sublicense those rights if specified conditions arise, including if the DOE terminates the award due to material failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the award, or if we fail to meet our cost-sharing obligations or cease developing our SMR. As a result, if we are unable to continue as a going concern, the value of our intellectual property, including in liquidation, may be difficult to assess.
Our ability to protect our patents and other proprietary rights may be challenged and is not guaranteed, exposing us to the possible loss of competitive advantage.
We rely upon a combination of patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secret,secrets and commercial agreements, such as confidentiality agreements, assignment agreements and license agreements, to protect the intellectual property associated with our NPMs and related technologies. These measures prevent third parties from using, practicing, selling, manufacturing or otherwise commercially exploiting our NPMs and related technologies, which would erode our competitive position in our market. Our success depends in large part on our ability to obtain and enforce patent protection for our NPMs, as well as our ability to operate without infringing on or violating the proprietary rights of others. We own and have licensed rights to patents and pending patent applications and will continue to file patent applications claiming new technologies directed to NPMs in the United States and in other jurisdictions based on factors such as commercial viability.
As with all industries, the patent position of power modules and nuclear energy companies generally is uncertain and is not a guaranteed right. During the patent procurement process, a patent office may require us or our licensors to narrow the scope of the claims of our or our licensors’ pending and future patent applications. This may limit the scope of patent protection and our or our licensors’ ability to claim patent infringement if the patent application is subsequently issued. In some cases, a patent application may not issue if we or our licensors are unable to overcome rejections from a patent office. If a patent application does not issue, we or our licensors may lose trade secrets that are disclosed and published in the
patent application and third parties may be able to exploit such published information in our patent application. Additionally, even if we obtain a patent registration in one jurisdiction (e.g., the United States), we cannot guarantee that we will obtain a patent registration for the same or related patent application in another jurisdiction (e.g., China) as patent laws differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Additionally, maintaining and enforcing patent rights can involve complex legal and factual questions and may be subject to litigation in some cases. For example, third parties may challenge the validity of our or our licensors’ patents based on prior art at a tribunal such as the Patent Trial and Appeal Board at the United States Patent and Trademark Office and/or in a federal court. Because we cannot assure that all of the potentially relevant prior art relating to our patents and patent applications has been found, third parties may prevail in invalidating a patent or preventing a patent application from being issued as a patent. If we or our licensors are able to maintain valid patents or prevail in patent challenges instituted by third parties, we or our licensors may still bear the risk of third parties “designing around” our technologies to avoid an intellectual property infringement claim.
We enjoy only limited geographical protection with respect to certain patents and may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.
We do not have worldwide patent rights for our NPMs and related technologies because there is no such thing as worldwide or “international patent rights.” Accordingly, we may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights in certain jurisdictions and their legal systems. Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on our NPMs worldwide can pose several challenges. First, procuring patent rights in multiple jurisdictions would be cost prohibitive because individual patent offices in different jurisdictions will have to examine each patent application separately. Therefore, costs such as examination fees, translation fees and attorney fees are considered. Once a patent is registered, we or our licensors will also have the continued obligation of paying maintenance fees periodically to avoid patents from becoming abandoned or lapsed. Second, the breadth of claims in patents may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. For instance, certain patent offices may require narrower claims, resulting in patent rights that are less extensive. Further, as noted above, we may not be able to obtain patents in some jurisdictions even if we obtain patents in other jurisdictions. Accordingly, our competitors may operate in countries where we do not have patent protection and can freely use our technologies and discoveries in
27
such countries to the extent such technologies and discoveries are publicly known or disclosed in countries where we do have patent protection or pending patent applications.
In addition, many countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses to third parties. Many countries also limit the enforceability of patents against government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, the patent owner may have limited remedies, which could materially diminish the value of such patent. If we or any of our licensors are forced to grant a license to third parties with respect to any patents relevant to our business, our competitive position may be impaired, and our business and financial condition may be adversely affected.
We may not identify relevant third-party patents or may incorrectly interpret the relevance, scope or expiration of a third-party patent, which might adversely affect our ability to develop and market NPMs.
We cannot guarantee that any of our patent searches or analyses, including the identification of relevant patents, the scope of patent claims or the expiration of relevant patents, are complete or thorough because there may be hundreds of thousands of relevant patents worldwide. We also cannot be certain that we have identified each and every third-party patent and pending application in the United States and abroad that is relevant to or necessary for the commercialization of NPMs in any jurisdiction. The scope of a patent claim is generally determined by an interpretation of the law, the written disclosure in a patent, and the patent’s prosecution history. Our interpretation of the relevance or the scope of a patent or a pending application may be incorrect or not accepted by a court of competent jurisdiction. Our determination of the expiration date of any patent in the United States or abroad that we consider relevant may be incorrect or inaccurate. Our failure to identify and correctly interpret relevant patents may negatively impact our ability to develop and market NPMs.
In addition, there are several circumstances under which a patent application may not be published and accessible to us or our licensors. For example, patent applications in the United States and many foreign jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing, but some patent applications in the United States may be maintained in secrecy until the patents are issued. Publications in the scientific literature also often lag behind actual discoveries. Therefore, we cannot be certain that others have not filed patent applications for technology covered by our issued patents or our pending applications, or that we were the first to invent the technology. Our competitors may have filed, and may in the future file, patent applications covering NPMs or technology similar to ours without us knowing. Any such patent application may have priority over our patent applications or patents, which could require us to procure rights to issued patents covering such technologies in order to avoid infringement claims.
We may be subject to claims of ownership and other rights to our patents and other intellectual property by third parties.
Our confidentiality and intellectual property assignment agreements with our employees, consultants and contractors generally provide that inventions conceived by the party in the course of rendering services to us will be our exclusive intellectual property. While we require our employees, consultants, and contractors to assign such intellectual property to us in the event that the intellectual property is not automatically assigned (e.g., as work made for hire), those agreements may not be honored and obligations to assign intellectual property may be challenged or breached. Moreover, there may be some circumstances where we are unable to negotiate for such ownership rights and/or others misappropriate those rights in the process.
We may be subject to claims that former employees, collaborators or other third parties have an interest in our patents or other intellectual property as an owner, a joint owner, a licensee, an inventor or a co-inventor. In the latter two cases, the failure to name the proper inventors on a patent application can result in the patents issuing thereon being unenforceable. Inventorship disputes may arise from conflicting views regarding the contributions of different individuals named as inventors, the effects of foreign laws where foreign nationals are involved in the development of the subject matter of the patent, conflicting obligations of third parties involved in developing our power modules or as a result of questions regarding co-ownership of potential joint inventions. Litigation may be necessary to resolve these and other claims challenging inventorship and/or ownership. Alternatively, or additionally, we may enter into agreements to clarify the scope of our rights in such intellectual property. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose exclusive ownership of, or right to use or license valuable intellectual property. Such an outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.
Regulatory Risk Factors
28
Our SDA applications may not be accepted for review or approved, and any rework necessary to address NRC concerns could significantly delay the commercialization of our products.
At the end of 2022, we submitted SDA applications to approve a VOYGR-6 plant design and to raise the licensed output of our NPM from 50 MWe to 77 MWe. The NRC accepted the application in July of 2023 and has begun the acceptancetechnical review. IfThere is no assurance that the SDA will be approved, and any revisions necessary to address concerns the NRC does not approve our applications, the rework required to address NRC concernsmay have could substantiallysignificantly delay the commercialization of our products.products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Our design is only approved in the United States, and we must obtain approvals on a country-by-country basis before we can sellcomplete the sale of our products abroad, which approvals may be delayed or denied or which may require modification to our design.
Our SMR design has not received regulatory approval in any country except the United States. Each country has its own safety approval that we must obtain before we can sell or install our NPMs abroad. Foreign approval processes may differ materially from the NRC process, and approvals may be denied or delayed in foreign countries, or some countries may require that we alter our design before obtaining approval. Denial or delay in approvals abroad could materially and adversely affect our business.
Our customers must obtain additional regulatory approvals before they construct power plants using our NPMs, and approvals may be denied or delayed.
The lead time to build a nuclear power facility is long and requires site licensing and approvals from applicable regulatory agencies before a plant can be constructed. The regulatory framework to obtain approvals is complex and varies from country to country. Any delays experienced by our customers in siting a power plant using our products and services could materially and adversely affect our business.
Our customers could incur substantial costs as a result of violations of, or liabilities under, environmental laws.
The operations and properties of our customers are subject to a variety of federal, state, local and foreign environmental, health and safety laws and regulations governing, among other things, air emissions, wastewater discharges, management and disposal of hazardous, non-hazardous and radioactive materials and waste and remediation of releases of hazardous materials. Although NuScale’s business is to design and sell technology rather than to construct and own or operate power
plants, we must design our technology so it complies with such laws and regulations. Compliance with environmental requirements could require our customers to incur significant expenditures or result in significant restrictions on their operations, and the failure to comply with such laws and regulations, including failing to obtain any necessary permits, could result in substantial fines or enforcement actions, including regulatory or judicial orders enjoining or curtailing operations or requiring our customers to conduct or fund remedial or corrective measures, install pollution control equipment or perform other actions. More vigorous enforcement by regulatory agencies, the future enactment of more stringent laws, regulations or permit requirements, including relating to climate change, or other unanticipated events may arise in the future and adversely impact the market for our products, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to stringent United States export and import control laws and regulations. Unfavorable changes in these laws and regulations or United States government licensing policies, our failure to secure timely United States government authorizations under these laws and regulations, or our failure to comply with these laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The inability to secure and maintain required export licenses or authorizations could negatively impact our ability to compete successfully or market our SMR technology for commercial applications outside the United States. For example, if we were unable to obtain or maintain our licenses to export certain nuclear hardware, we would be effectively prohibited from exporting our SMR technology in non-United States locations, which would limit the number of customers to those in the United States. In addition, if we were unable to obtain authorization to export our technology, hardware, code or technical assistance, we would experience a limited market for our technology, which would provide a competitive edge to international suppliers of SMRs. In both cases, these restrictions could lead to an adverse impact on our ability to sell our commercial technology. Similarly, if we were unable to secure export authorization, we may need to implement design changes to our NPM to address issues with our domestic supplier chain, which may increase costs or result in delays in delivery of new plants and subsequent additional NPMs when ordered.
29
Failure to comply with export control laws and regulations could expose us to civil or criminal penalties, fines, investigations, more onerous compliance requirements, loss of export privileges, debarment from government contracts or limitations on our ability to enter into contracts with the United States government. In addition, any changes in export control regulations or United States government licensing policy, such as that necessary to implement United States government commitments to multilateral control regimes, may restrict our operations.
Our business is subject to a wide variety of extensive and evolving government laws and regulations. Changes in and/or failure to comply with such laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Regulatory risk factors associated with our business also include:
•our ability to obtain additional applicable approvals, licenses or certifications from regulatory agencies, if required, and to maintain current approvals, licenses or certifications;
•regulatory delays, delays imposed as a result of regulatory inspections, and changing regulatory requirements, may cause a delay in our ability to fulfill our existing or future orders, or cause planned plants to not be completed at all, many of which may be out of our control, including natural disasters, changes in governmental regulations or in the status of our regulatory approvals or applications or other events that force us to cancel or reschedule plant construction, which could have an adverse impact on our business and financial condition; and
•challenges as a result of regulatory processes or in NuScale’s ability to secure the necessary permissions to establish these plant sites could delay our ability to achieve our target build rate and could adversely affect our business.
General Risk Factors
In an effort to halt the outbreak of COVID-19, a number of countries, including the United States, previously placed significant restrictions on travel, many businesses announced extended closures, and many businesses and governmental agencies allowed employees to work remotely, which in some cases may reduce the effectiveness of those employees. If there is a resurgence in COVID-19 cases or a similar health crisis, travel restrictions and business closures may in the future adversely affect our operations locally and worldwide, including our ability to obtain regulatory approvals and to manufacture, market, sell or distribute our products, which could materially and adversely affect our business.
We are subject to cybersecurity risks.
Like other businesses, we face cybersecurity risks. Threat sources continue to seek to exploit potential vulnerabilities. These cyberattacks are becoming increasingly sophisticated and dynamic. We expect these cyberattacks to continue to occur in the future and we are constantly managing efforts to infiltrate and compromise our information technology systems and data. While we develop and maintain systems seeking to prevent security breaches from occurring, the development and maintenance of these systems is costly and requires ongoing monitoring and updating as techniques used in such attacks become more sophisticated and change frequently. We, and the third parties on which we rely, may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventive measures.
A cybersecurity breach, including physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses, malware, attacks by hackers, ransomware attacks, phishing attacks, supply chain attacks, breaches due to employee error or misconduct and other similar breaches, of our physical assets or information systems, or those of our vendors, business partners and interconnected entities or regulators could impact our operations or result in the theft or inappropriate release of certain types of information, including critical infrastructure information, sensitive customer, vendor and employee data, trading or other confidential data. The risk of these system-related events and cybersecurity breaches occurring continues to intensify, and while we have not directly experienced a material breach or disruption to our network or information systems or our operations to-date, such cyberattacks continue to increase in sophistication and frequency, and we may be unable to prevent all such cyberattacks in the future.
If a significant breach were to occur, our reputation could be negatively affected, customer confidence in us or others in the industry could be diminished, or we could be subject to legal claims, loss of revenues, increased costs or operations shutdown. In addition, our network and information systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from power outages, telecommunications failures, accidents, natural disasters (including extreme weather arising from short-term or any long-term changes in weather patterns), terrorist attacks and similar events. Our system redundancy may be ineffective or inadequate, and our disaster recovery planning may not be sufficient for all eventualities. Moreover, the amount and scope
30
of insurance maintained against losses resulting from any such events or security breaches may not be sufficient to cover losses or otherwise adequately compensate for any disruptions to business that could result. Furthermore, in the future, such insurance may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.
In addition, new or updated security regulations or unforeseen threat sources could require changes in current measures taken by us or our business operations and could adversely affect our consolidated financial statements.
Changes in tax laws or regulations may increase tax uncertainty and adversely affect results of our operations and our effective tax rate.
We will be subject to taxes in the United States and certain foreign jurisdictions. Due to economic and political conditions, tax rates in and duties imposed by various jurisdictions, including the United States, may be subject to change. Our future effective tax rates could be affected by changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities and changes in tax laws or their interpretation. In addition, we may be subject to income tax audits by various tax jurisdictions. An adverse resolution by one or more taxing authorities could have a material impact on our finances. Further, we may be unable to utilize any net operating losses in the event a change in control is determined to have occurred.
We may become involved in litigation that may materially adversely affect us.
We are currently named in a number of purported class action lawsuit related to the Transactionlawsuits (see “Legal Proceedings”), and
from time to time, we may become involved in various legal proceedings relating to other matters, incidental to the ordinary course of our business, including intellectual property, commercial, product liability, employment, class action, whistleblower and other litigation and claims, and governmental and other regulatory investigations and proceedings. Such matters can be time-consuming, divert management’s attention and resources from the operation of our business and cause us to incur significant expenses or liability or require us to change our business practices. The
One of the existing shareholder class action lawsuitlawsuits claims in part that NuScale LLC breached its prior LLC operating agreement or breached a duty of good faith and fair dealing in amending the LLC operating agreement in the Transaction without obtaining the consent of former common unit holders of NuScale LLC as a separate class. While we disagree with plaintiffs’ claims, the risk of loss if plaintiffs prevail could be material to the Company. The existingThis class action lawsuit claims in part that the conversion of preferred units to common units, which occurred in conjunction with the merger, was inequitable to common unit holders. Plaintiffs are now seeking to amend their complaint to add a claim that this conversion itself breached the operating agreement.
The other shareholder class action lawsuit claims that NuScale and members of management made materially false and/or misleading statements and failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations and prospects, and specifically about certain of the Company’s agreements with customers. While two causes of action were filed, these lawsuits have been consolidated before the same judge in the federal district court in Oregon.
While we disagree with all of the plaintiffs’ claims included in the class action lawsuits, the risk of loss if plaintiffs prevail would be material to the Company. Because of the potential risks, expenses and uncertainties of litigation, we may, from time to time, settle disputes, even where we believe that we
have meritorious claims or defenses. Because litigation is inherently unpredictable, we cannot assure you that the results of any of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our business.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Shares of Class A Common Stock or Warrants
Our Organizational Documents designate the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between NuScale Corp and its stockholders.
Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws (“Organizational Documents”) provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or, if such court does not have subject matter jurisdiction thereof, another state or federal court located within the State of Delaware, shall be the exclusive forum for certain actions and claims. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with NuScale or any of its directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims. However, stockholders will not be deemed to have waived NuScale Corp’s compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder and this provision would not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act, which provides for the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts with respect to all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder, or the Securities Act. Further, Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce
31
any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. Accordingly, both state and federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain such claims. To prevent having to litigate claims in multiple jurisdictions and the threat of inconsistent or contrary rulings by different courts, among other considerations, the Organizational Documents provide that the federal district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. Accordingly, there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such provision with respect to suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. If a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in the Organizational Documents to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our warrant agreement designates the courts of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by holders of our warrants, which could limit the ability of warrant holders to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with our company.
Our warrant agreement provides that, subject to applicable law, (i) any action, proceeding or claim against us arising out of or relating in any way to the warrant agreement, including under the Securities Act, will be brought and enforced in the courts of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and (ii) that we irrevocably submit to such jurisdiction, which jurisdiction shall be the exclusive forum for any such action, proceeding or claim. We will waive any objection to such exclusive jurisdiction and that such courts represent an inconvenient forum.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, these provisions of the warrant agreement will not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal district courts of the United States of America are the sole and exclusive forum. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in any of our warrants shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the forum provisions in our warrant agreement. If any action, the subject matter of which is within the scope of the forum provisions of the warrant agreement, is filed in a court other than a court of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (a “foreign action”) in the name of any holder of our warrants, such holder shall be deemed to have consented to: (x) the personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in the State of New York in connection with any action brought in any such court to enforce the forum provisions (an “enforcement action”), and (y) having service of process made upon such warrant holder in any such enforcement action by service upon such warrant holder’s counsel in the foreign action as agent for such warrant holder.
This choice-of-forum provision may limit a warrant holder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with our company, which may discourage such lawsuits. Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision of our warrant agreement inapplicable or unenforceable with respect to one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and result in a diversion of the time and resources of our management and board of directors.
The Warrants are accounted for as liabilities and the changes in value of the Warrants could have a material effect on our financial results.
The Warrants are currently classified as liabilities. Under this accounting treatment, we are required to measure the fair value of the Warrants at the end of each reporting period and recognize changes in the fair value from the prior period in our operating results for the current period. As a result of the recurring fair value measurement, our financial statements and results of operations may fluctuate quarterly based on factors which are outside our control. We expect that we will recognize non-cash gains or losses due to the quarterly fair valuation of the Warrants and that such gains or losses could be material.
The price of shares of Class A common stock and Warrants may be volatile.
The price of shares of Class A common stock and Warrants may fluctuate due to a variety of factors, including:
•changes in the industries in which we and our customers operate;
•variations in itsour operating performance and the performance of our competitors in general;
•material and adverse impacts of thepandemics such as COVID-19, pandemic or other future pandemics on the markets and the broader global economy;
•actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly or annual operating results;
•the public’s reaction to our press releases, other public announcements and its filings with the SEC;
32
•our failure or the failure of our competitors to meet analysts’ projections or guidance that we or our competitors may give to the market;
•additions and departures of key personnel;
•changes in laws and regulations affecting its business;our business or industry;
•commencement of, or involvement in, litigation involving us;
•changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of securities or the incurrence of additional debt;
•publication of research reports by securities analysts about us, our competitors or our industry;
•sales of shares of Class A common stock by our stockholders, including those who purchased shares of Class A common stock in private placements in connection with the Merger;Merger, or sales by us under our “at the market” offering arrangement described below; and
•general economic and political conditions such as recessions, interest rates, fuel prices, foreign currency fluctuations, international tariffs, social, political and economic risks and acts of war or terrorism.
These market and industry factors may materially reduce the market price of shares of Class A common stock and Warrants regardless of our operating performance.
A significant portion of our total outstanding shares may be sold into the market. In addition, we and holders of equity awards may also sell additional shares into the market. This could cause the market price of shares of Class A common stock to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of Class A common stock in the public market could occur at any time. These sales, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of shares of Class A common stock. On August 9, 2023, we entered into a sales agreement (Sales Agreement) with Cowen and Company, LLC, B. Riley Securities, Inc. and Canaccord Genuity LLC (collectively, “sales agents”) relating to shares of our Class A common stock offered from time to time “at the market.” In accordance with the terms of the Sales Agreement, we may offer and sell shares of our Class A common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $150,000,000 from time to time through or to each selling agent acting as our agent or principal. As of December 31, 2023, we had sold 1,737,378 shares of Class A common stock at a weighted average price of $5.96 per share, for a gross and net price of $10.4 million and $9.8 million, respectively.
Subject to certain limitations in the Sales Agreement and compliance with applicable law, we have the discretion to deliver a placement notice to the sales agents at any time throughout the term of the Sales Agreement. The number of shares that are sold by a sales agent after we deliver a placement notice will fluctuate based on the market price of the Class A common stock during the sales period and limits we set. Because the price per share of each share sold will fluctuate based on the market price of our Class A common stock during the sales period, it is not possible at this time to predict the number of shares that will be ultimately issued.
As of February 28,December 31, 2023, there were (i) 69,878,06776,895,166 shares of Class A common stock outstanding, (ii) 157,090,820154,477,032 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the exchange of NuScale LLC Class B units (together with cancellation of an equal number of shares of NuScale Corp Class B common stock) pursuant to the procedures set forth in the A&R NuScale LLC Agreement, and (iii) 30,155,71031,279,229 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options, Warrants and Warrants.Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”).
We have registered on a Post-Effective Amendment to Form S-1, on Form S-3, the potential resale of 209,870,307204,063,030 shares of Class A common stock that otherwise could be subject to resale restrictions. We also have registered on a Form S-8 an aggregate of 32,503,809 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of options and other equity awards issued under the NuScale LLC Fourth Amended and Restated 2011 Equity Incentive Plan and the NuScale Corp 2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The market price of shares of Class A common stock could decline if the holders of shares sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to sell them.
As part of a shelf registration on a Form S-3, NuScale may offer Class A common stock, debt securities, warrants, and/or units consisting of some or all of the securities in any combination, the aggregate offering price of securities of which must not exceed $500,000,000. The market price of shares of Class A common stock could decline if the holders of shares sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to sell them.
NuScale Warrants and Options will become exercisable for shares of Class A common stock, which, if exercised, would increase the number of shares eligible for future resale in the public market and result in dilution to our stockholders.
Outstanding Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 18,458,70318,458,701 shares of Class A common stock are exercisable in accordance with the terms of the warrant agreement governing those securities. The exercise price of these warrants is $11.50 per share. In addition, outstanding options exercisable in exchange for an aggregate of 12,224,7839,565,211 shares of Class A
33
common stock are or will become exercisable in accordance with the terms of the Fourth Amended and Restated 2011 Equity Incentive Plan of NuScale LLC. To the extent such warrants or options are exercised, additional shares of Class A common stock will be issued, which will result in dilution to the holders of Class A common stock and increase the number of shares eligible for resale in the public market. Sales of substantial numbers of such shares in the public market or the fact that such warrants may be exercised could adversely affect the prevailing market prices of Class A common stock.
Investors’ ability to make transactions in our securities could be limited and if we cannot maintain our listing on the NYSE, we may be subject to additional trading restrictions.
An active trading market for our securities may not be sustained. In addition, we may be unable to maintain the listing of our securities on the NYSE in the future.
The National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, which is a federal statute, prevents or preempts the states from regulating the sale of certain securities, which are referred to as “covered securities.” If our securities were not listed on the NYSE or another national securities exchange, such securities would not qualify as covered securities and we would be subject to regulation in each state in which we offer our securities because states are not preempted from regulating the sale of securities that are not covered securities.
Reports published by analysts, including projections in those reports that differ from our actual results, could adversely affect the price and trading volume of our Class A common stock.
Securities research analysts may establish and publish their own periodic projections for NuScale.NuScale Corp. These projections may vary widely and may not accurately predict the results we actually achieve. Our share price may decline if our actual results do not match the projections of these securities research analysts. Similarly, if one or more of the analysts who write reports on us downgrades our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our share price could decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, our share price or trading volume could decline. Moreover, if no analysts commence coverage of us, the market price and volume for our common shares could be adversely affected.
We are subject to changing law and regulations regarding regulatory matters, corporate governance and public disclosure that have increased and will continue to increase our costs and the risk of non-compliance.
We are subject to rules and regulations by various governing bodies, including the SEC, which are charged with the protection of investors and the oversight of companies whose securities are publicly traded, and to new and evolving regulatory measures under applicable law. Our efforts to comply with new and changing laws and regulations have resulted in, and likely will continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention.
Moreover, because these laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance becomes available. This evolution may result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and additional costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to our disclosure and governance practices. If we fail to address and comply with these regulations and any subsequent changes, we may be subject to penalty and our business may be harmed.
We have in the past and may in the future be subject to short selling strategies that could result in a reduction in the market price of our Class A common stock.
Short selling is the practice of selling securities that the seller has borrowed from a third party with the intention of buying identical securities at a later date, at a lower price, to return to the lender and the short seller profits. Accordingly, it is in the short seller’s best interests for the price of the stock to decline. At any time, short sellers may publish, or arrange for the dissemination of, opinions, or characterizations that are intended to create negative market momentum, including through the use of social media. In light of the recent proliferation of generative artificial intelligence tools and large language models, there is also a risk that the dissemination of such opinions, characterizations or disinformation may negatively impact the conclusions that these tools and models draw about our business and prospects.
Short selling reports may potentially lead to increased volatility in an issuer’s stock price and to regulatory and governmental inquiries. In October and November 2023, a short seller published reports that contained certain negative and false allegations regarding our business and financial prospects. Regardless of merit, allegations and false statements by short sellers may spread quickly and diminish confidence in our business, financial prospects, or reputation. As a result,
34
maintaining or reinforcing our reputation may require us to devote significant resources to refute incorrect or misleading allegations, to pursue or defend related legal actions, or to engage in other activities that could be costly, time consuming or unsuccessful. Additionally, any potential inquiry or formal investigation from a governmental organization or other regulatory body, including an inquiry from the SEC, arising from the presence of such allegations could result in a material diversion of our management’s time and may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We may be subject to securities litigation, which is expensive and could divert management attention.
The market price of our Class A common stock may be volatile and, in the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. We are now, and may be in the future, the target of this type of litigation in the future. Securities litigation against us could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention from other business concerns, which could seriously harm our business.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None
Item 1C. Cybersecurity
The Board of Directors oversees management’s processes for identifying and mitigating risks, including cybersecurity risks, to help align our risk exposure with our strategic objectives. Senior leadership, including our Chief Compliance Officer and Vice President, Information Technology (“IT”), regularly brief the Board of Directors on our cybersecurity and information security posture and the Board of Directors is apprised of any cybersecurity incidents deemed to have a moderate or higher business impact. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is briefed by senior leadership, as appropriate, on the cybersecurity of DOE and NRC programs and the security of our business supply chain. Other than oversight of business cybersecurity, the full Board retains oversight of cybersecurity because of its importance to NuScale and the heightened risk in the nuclear power sector. In the event of an incident, we intend to follow our incident response playbook, which outlines the steps to be followed from incident detection to mitigation, recovery and notification, including notifying functional areas (e.g. legal), as well as senior leadership and the Board, as appropriate.
Our corporate information security organization, led by our Vice President, IT is responsible for our overall information security strategy, policy, security engineering, operations and cyber threat detection and response. The current Vice President, IT has extensive information technology and program management experience, has over a decade of experience leading cybersecurity oversight, and others on our IT security team have cybersecurity experience or certifications, such as the Certified Information Systems Security Professional certification. The corporate information security organization manages and continually enhances a robust enterprise security structure with the ultimate goal of preventing cybersecurity incidents to the extent feasible, while simultaneously increasing our system resilience in an effort to minimize the business impact should an incident occur.
The corporate information security organization has implemented a governance structure and processes to assess, identify, manage and report cybersecurity risks. For the current reporting period, there have been no incidents that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect NuScale, including its business strategy, results of operations or financial condition. As a nuclear contractor, we must comply with extensive regulations, including requirements imposed by the DOE and NRC related to adequately protecting safeguards information and reporting cybersecurity incidents to the DOE and NRC when required. We have implemented cybersecurity policies and frameworks based on industry and governmental standards to align closely with DOE and NRC requirements, instructions and guidance. In addition to following DOE and NRC guidance and implementing pre-existing third party frameworks, we have developed our own practices, which we believe enhance our ability to identify and manage cybersecurity risks.
Third parties also play a role in our cybersecurity. We engage third-party services to conduct around the clock monitoring and prevention of suspected malicious activity on company-owned systems, filter all email and web browser activity, provide proactive threat intelligence services, and perform regular evaluations of our security controls, whether through external and internal network penetration testing, physical security assessments, independent audits or consulting. These evaluations include testing both the design and operational effectiveness of security controls. We also share and receive threat intelligence with our nuclear design and construction partners, government agencies, information sharing and analysis centers and cybersecurity associations.
Assessing, identifying and managing cybersecurity related risks are integrated into our overall enterprise risk management (“ERM”) process. Cybersecurity related risks are included in the risk universe that the ERM function evaluates to assess top risks to the enterprise on an annual basis. To the extent the ERM process identifies a heightened cybersecurity related
35
risk, risk owners are assigned to develop risk mitigation plans, which are then tracked to completion. The ERM process’s annual risk assessment is presented by the Senior Director, Treasury, SOX, ERM and ESG to the Board of Directors.
We rely heavily on our supply chain to deliver our products and services to our customers, and a cybersecurity incident at a supplier, subcontractor or joint venture partner could materially adversely impact us. We assess third party cybersecurity controls through a cybersecurity questionnaire and include security and privacy addendums to our contracts where applicable. We also contractually flow cybersecurity regulatory requirements to our subcontractors as required by government agency-specific requirements. These contractual flow downs include the requirement that our subcontractors implement certain security controls. We also require that our subcontractors report cybersecurity incidents to us so that we can assess the impact of the incident on us. For select suppliers, we engage third-party cybersecurity monitoring and alerting services, and seek to work directly with those suppliers to address potential deficiencies identified. We also make available cybersecurity education and awareness materials and briefings to our suppliers, as necessary.
Notwithstanding the extensive approach we take to cybersecurity, we may not be successful in preventing or mitigating a cybersecurity incident that could have a material adverse effect on us. While NuScale Power maintains cybersecurity insurance, the costs related to cybersecurity threats or disruptions may not be fully insured. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for a discussion of cybersecurity risks.
Item 2. Properties
•Corvallis, OR. NuScale’s engineering and design center in Corvallis houses over 200 staff members,29 full-time and 150 hybrid employees, with capacity for 340, in approximately 60,00055,000 square feet of office, computing, and storage space. Technical and related support activities such as engineering, design, operations, testing, code development, quality assurance, licensing and project management are performed at this facility. Our full-scale reactor control room simulator and computational computing cluster are also located at this facility. NuScale personnel use the computational cluster in a secure data center to perform structural, thermal hydraulic, fluid dynamics and neutronics calculations. We believe the location of our Corvallis facilities provides us with unique access to the technical expertise found in Oregon State University, one of the largest nuclear engineering programs on the west coast.
•Richland, WA.Houston, TX. The RichlandHouston office, houses staff focused on operations, human factors, plant services and maintenance planning,a leased property with a functional limited-scale simulator that has communication capability withapproximately 773 square feet, is used to support various members of the Corvallis full-scale simulator.Finance team.
•Rockville, MD. The Rockville office, a 1,973 square foot leased property, has been a key enabler for the NuScale strategy of early, frequent, and responsive interaction with the NRC.
On January 18, 2024, a fire broke out in the building housing the Company’s Portland, Oregon office, which destroyed the Company’s office. The cause of the fire remains under investigation. No one was injured in the fire and no critical records were lost. The office was set up for temporary use with no employees using it full time; as a result, losses were limited to furniture, a copier and computer systems. The Company carries insurance that will cover these losses, which are not expected to be material. Executives and other employees previously using that office are working remotely or commuting to the Company’s Corvallis, Oregon office as needed. Rent for the Portland, Oregon office has been abated until the office can be occupied.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In the regular course of business, we arethe Company is involved in various legal proceedings and claims incidental to the normal course of business. Additionally, weOther than as disclosed immediately below, the Company does not believe that any legal claims are involved in various legal proceedings and claims relatingmaterial to the Transaction.Company. Management does not believe that resolution of any of these matters will materially affect the Company’s financial position or results of operations. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” above for further discussion of how certain risks, including risks related to litigation, may affect the Company.
On September 19, 2022, thirteen purported members of NuScale LLC filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon against NuScale LLC, Fluor Enterprises, Japan NuScale Innovation, Inc., and Sargent & Lundy Holdings, LLC. The plaintiffs purport to represent a class of individuals who held common units or options to purchase common units in NuScale LLC and seek declaratory relief and damages based on breach of contract and other common law claims. The claims are based on amendments to the operating agreement of NuScale LLC in connection with the Merger.Merger between NuScale LLC and Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. Plaintiffs claim, among other things, that such amendments breached NuScale LLC’s 5th Amended and Restated Operating Agreement and required the consent of holders of common units in NuScale LLC voting as a separate class. NuScale LLC’s responseLLC filed a motion to dismiss the complaint was filed on November 21, 2022. Plaintiffs’ reply wasPlaintiffs filed a response on January 17, 2023, and NuScale LLC filed a reply to Plaintiffs’ response on February 14, 2023. A hearing on various
36
motions to dismiss took place on May 17, 2023, and on August 3, 2023, the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case issued a report and recommendation that recommended that NuScale LLC’s motion to dismiss be denied. On August 17, 2023, NuScale LLC filed an objection to the report and recommendation. On November 13, 2023, the District Court Judge entered an order accepting the report and recommendation.On December 8, 2023, Plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend their complaint to add, among other things, a claim that the conversion of preferred LLC units into common LLC units at the time of the Merger itself breached NuScale LLC’s operating agreement.NuScale LLC opposed the proposed amendment. While no assurance can be given as to the ultimate outcome of this matter, we dothe Company does not believe it is probable that a loss will be incurred and we havethe Company has not recorded any liability as a result of these actions.
Two other shareholder class action lawsuits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon against the Company, John Hopkins, Chris Colbert, Robert Hamady and Clayton Scott: (1) Sigman v. NuScale Power Corp., et al. (Case No. 23-1689, filed November 15, 2023), and (2) Ryckewaert v. NuScale Power Corp., et al. (Case No. 23-1956, filed December 26, 2023). These lawsuits assert virtually identical allegations and claims and were consolidated before the same judge on February 2, 2024. The lawsuits assert claims under the federal securities laws and allege that the Company and members of management made materially false and/or misleading statements and failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations and prospects, and specifically about certain of the Company’s agreements with customers. The Court has appointed lead plaintiff and lead counsel, and it has ordered the plaintiffs to file an amended complaint on or before March 21, 2024 and for NuScale to respond 28 days thereafter. While no assurance can be given as to the ultimate outcome of this matter, the Company does not believe it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the Company has not recorded any liability as a result of these actions.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Class A common stock is listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “SMR”. There is no established public trading market for Class B common stock.
As of March 1, 2023,February 28, 2024, we had 32,38540,418 Class A shareowners of record and 79 Class B shareowners of record.
Performance Graph
The following graph shows changes over the period since the Transaction, May 2, 2022, through December 31, 2022,2023, in the value of $100, invested in: (i) our Class A common shares; (ii) the Russell 3000 Index; and (iii) the peer group, which consists of publicly-tradedpublicly traded companies in the nuclear or energy transition industries comprised of Ballard Power Systems Inc., Bloom Energy Corporation, BWX Technologies, Inc., Cameco Corporation, Centrus Energy Corp., Enphase Energy, Inc., Enovix Corporation, FuelCell Energy, Inc., Plug Power Inc., and SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. and Volta Inc.. The closing price of a share of NuScale’s Class A common sharesstock as of December 30, 2022,29, 2023, the last trading day of 2022,2023, was $10.26$3.29 on the NYSE.
Item 6. [Reserved]
Item 7. Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations should be read together with our financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 20222023 and 20212022 together with related notes thereto. Discussions of 2021 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2022 and 2021 are not included in this report, and can
38
be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in NuScale Power Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 16, 2023. This discussion may contain forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties.
Our actual results may differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this section to “NuScale,” “the Company,” “us,” “our” or “we” refer to NuScale Power, LLC (“NuScale LLC”) prior to the Transaction, and to NuScale Power Corporation (“NuScale Corp”) following the consummation of the Transaction.
Overview
Our mission is to provide scalable advanced nuclear technology to produce electricity, heat and clean water to improve the quality of life for people around the world. We are changing the power that changes the world by creating an energy source that is smarter, cleaner, safer and cost competitive.
Our small modular reactor (“SMR”), known as NuScale Power Module (“NPM”), provides a scalable power plant solution incorporating enhanced safety, improved affordability and extended flexibility for diverse electrical and process heat applications. Our scalable design provides carbon-free energy at a reduced cost when compared with gigawatt-sized nuclear facilities.
Since our founding in 2007, we have made significant progress towards commercializing the first SMR in the United States. In 2017, we submitted our Design Certification Application (“DCA”) to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”). On August 28, 2020, the NRC issued its Final Safety Evaluation Report, representing the NRC’s completion of its technical review. On September 11, 2020 the NRC issued its Standard Design Approval (“SDA”) of our NPM and scalable plant design. With this phase of NuScale’s DCA now complete, customers may proceed with plans to develop NuScale power plants with the understanding that the NRC has approved the safety aspects of the NPM and plant design. We expect our operating losses and negative operating cash flow to grow until the commercialization of the NPM. On January 19, 2023, the NRC published in the Federal Register a final rule that certifies NuScale’s SMR design for use in the United States, which became effective 30 days after publication.
In January 2023, the Company submitted a SDA Application and the associated licensing topical reports to the NRC for a NuScale’s 6-unit 77 MWe NPM design. Once approved, customers in the United States will be able to reference the certified design and SDA for expedited construction and operating licensing of NuScale’s SMR pursuant to 10 CFR Part 52. On July 31, 2023, the NRC formally announced that it has accepted the Company’s SDA Application for formal review. Based on the NRC’s published schedule for SDA Application review, we expect the NRC will complete its review and SDA approval to be received by July 31, 2025.
Merger with Spring Valley
In December 2021, NuScale LLC entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (as amended, modified, supplemented or waived, the(the “Merger Agreement”), between with Spring Valley Acquisition Corp., NuScale LLC (“Spring Valley”) and Spring Valley Merger Sub, LLC (“Merger Sub”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Spring Valley (“Merger Sub”).Valley. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub merged with and into NuScale LLC (the “Merger”), with NuScale LLC surviving the Merger (the “Surviving Company”), Spring Valley Acquisition Corp wasbeing renamed NuScale Power Corporation,Corp, and NuScale LLC continuedcontinuing to be held as a wholly controlled subsidiary of NuScale CorpPower Corporation in an “Up-C”“Up-
39
C” structure. On May 2, 2022, the transactiontransactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Merger (collectively the “Transaction”), was were completed.
The Transaction was accounted foris shown as a reverse recapitalization as provided under GAAP. NuScale CorpSpring Valley is the acquired company, with NuScale LLC treated as the acquirer. This determination reflects that Legacy NuScale Equityholders heldholding a majority of the voting power of NuScale Corp, that NuScale LLC’s pre-merger operations werebeing the majority post-merger operations of NuScale Corp and that NuScale LLC’s management team retaining similar roles at NuScale Corp. Accordingly, although NuScale Corp (f/k/a Spring Valley) is the legal parent company, GAAP dictates that the financial statements of NuScale Corp represent a continuation of NuScale LLC’s operations, with the Transaction being treated as though NuScale LLC issued ownership interests for NuScale Corp,Spring Valley, accompanied by a recapitalization. The net assets of NuScale LLC are stated at historical cost, with no incremental goodwill or other intangible assets recorded for the effects of the Merger with Spring Valley.
Transaction. The following table provides the historical costconsummation of the assetsTransaction resulted in NuScale LLC receiving cash equal to $341.5 million and assuming Warrant liabilities assumed as a result of the Transaction:
Key Factors Affecting Our Prospects and Future Results
We believe that our performance and future success depend on a number of factors that present significant opportunities for us but also pose risks and challenges, including competition from carbon-based and other non-carbon-based energy generators, the risk of perceived safety issues and their consequences for our reputation and the other factors discussed under the section titled “Risk Factors.” We believe the factors described below are key to our success.
Commencing and Expanding Commercial Launch Operations
In September 2020, we became the first and only company to receive NRC standard design approvalSDA for a small modular reactor. We believe our commercialization activities are being completed at a pace that can support delivery of NPMs to a client site as early as 2028. We have an agreement in place with UAMPS to deploy a NuScale 6-module power plant at the DOE’s Idaho National Laboratory as part of UAMPS’ Carbon Free Power Project (“CFPP” or “the Project”). Commercial operation of the first NPM is slated for 2029. In December 2022, we signed a contract for Front-End Engineering and Design (“FEED”) work with RoPower Nuclear S.A, owned by S.N. Nuclearelectrica S.A. and Nova Power & Gas S.A., entities that operate under the authority of the Romanian Ministry of Energy, to advance the deployment of our NPMs to Romania. Under Phase 1 of the contract, we will define the major site and specific inputs for a VOYGR-6 SMR power plant to be deployed at the Doicesti Power Station site in Romania. We expect the site in Romania to use six modules and to be commercially operable as early as 2029.2029- 2030.
We have over 120100 potential target customers in addition to UAMPS and RoPower, as well as ten potential customers across seven countries that we consider highly interested customers who are considering an NPM power plant deployment in the late 2020s or early 2030s. We believe the long lead-time involved with siting an SMR, the number of customers in our pipeline and the work being performed by these potential customers involving a NuScale deployment project bode well for our potential future success. Further, in December 2022, we completed our Standard Plant Design (“SPD”), which provides potential customers with a generic VOYGR power plant design that will serve as a starting point for deploying site-specific designs, including supporting client licensing and deployment activities.
Regulatory Approvals
In December 2022, we appliedJanuary 2023, the Company submitted a Standard Design Approval (SDA) Application and the associated licensing topical reports to the NRC for ana NuScale’s 6-unit 77 MWe NPM design. Once approved, customers in the United States will be able to reference the certified design and SDA for our latest power enhanced designexpedited construction and operating licensing of NuScale’s SMR pursuant to 10 CFR Part 52. On July 31, 2023, the NRC formally announced that it has accepted the Company’s SDA Application for review. Based on the NRC’s published schedule for SDA Application review, we expect the NRC will complete its review and SDA approval to be the heart of VOYGR-6 NuScale Plant. If approved, the licensed output of our NPM will be raised from 50 MWe to 77 MWe. A VOYGR-6 NuScale Plant referencing the SDA will be capable of generating 462 MWe (gross). Approval of the design, which could come in 2024, would increase the cost-competitiveness of our NPM, and we consider obtaining such approval a critical milestone.received by July 31, 2025.
Other factors that we believe are critical to our future success are country-level approvals of our NPM design. We also believe site-approvals by our customers to be key to facilitating broader adoption of our products and services. Obtaining these approvals before others is critical in maintaining our competitive advantage.
Key Components of Results of Operations
We are an early-stage company and our historical results may not be indicative of our future results. Accordingly, the drivers of our future financial results, as well as the components of such results, may not be comparable to our historical or future results of operations.
40
Revenue
We have not generated any material revenue to date. All revenue that we have generated to date arises from engineering and licensing services provided to potential customers. Ascustomers, including those as a result of those FEED services, weservices. We expect to generate a significant portion of our revenue from the sale of NPMs. We also expect to generate revenue by providing critical services, such as start-up and testing and nuclear fuel and refueling services, over the life cycle of each power plant.
Expenses
Research and Development Expense
Our research and development (“R&D”) expenses consist primarily of internal and external expenses incurred in connection with our R&D activities. These expenses include labor directly performed on our projects and fees paid to third parties working on and testing specific aspects of our NPM design. R&D costs have been expensed as incurred.
General and Administrative Expenses
G&A expenses consist of compensation costs for personnel in executive, finance, accounting, human resources and other administrative functions. G&A expenses also include legal fees, professional fees paid for accounting, auditing, consulting services, insurance costs and facility costs.
Other Expense
Other operating expenses consist primarily of compensation costs (including indirect benefits and equity-based compensation expense) for operating personnel.
Income Tax Effects
NuScale LLC was historically and remains a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes with each partner being separately taxed on its share of taxable income or loss. NuScale Corp is subject to U.S. federal income taxes, in addition to state and local income taxes, with respect to its distributive share of any net taxable income or loss and any related tax credits of NuScale LLC.
41
Results of Operations
| (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) | Twelve Months Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | (in thousands) | Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | Revenue | 11,804 | $ | 2,862 | $ | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cost of sales | Cost of sales | (7,317) | (1,770) | (355) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross margin | Gross margin | 4,487 | 1,092 | 245 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Research and development expenses | Research and development expenses | 123,416 | 93,136 | 95,267 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| General and administrative expenses | General and administrative expenses | 63,057 | 45,226 | 37,176 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other expenses | Other expenses | 48,009 | 37,030 | 26,645 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss from operations | Loss from operations | (229,995) | (174,300) | (158,843) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Department of Energy cost share | 72,336 | 73,522 | 71,109 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Decrease (increase) in fair value of warrant liabilities | 12,148 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income and other cost share (interest expense) | 3,938 | (1,715) | (653) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsored cost share | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in fair value of warrant liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income (expense) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss before income taxes | Loss before income taxes | (141,573) | $ | (102,493) | $ | (88,387) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 20222023 and 20212022
Changes in Presentation
For the year ended December 31, 2022, amounts totaling $4,246 and $3,504 were reclassified out of G&A expenses and into R&D expenses and Other expenses, respectively, while for the year ended December 31, 2021, amounts totaling $1,252 and $5,249, respectively, were reclassified out of G&A expenses and into R&D expenses and Other expenses, to conform to the current year presentation.
Revenue
The increase in revenue was attributable to activities in support of the EPCDAEngineering, Procurement and Construction Development Agreement for CFPP, as well as nuclear technologies consulting services.
R&D Expense
R&D expenses increased due to $25.9the Release Agreement with CFPP in the amount of $49.8 million, of professional fees associated with the standard plant design work andpartially offset by lower compensation costs of $3.8$8.7 million as a result of increased headcountwe transition from R&D to commercialization activities, as we continue to expand our licensing efforts.well as lower professional fees.
G&A Expenses
G&A expenses increased as a result of $3.6$4.3 million in compensation costs due to an increase in headcount $3.0 million in insurance costs, $3.4 million in equity-based compensation, higher software and hardware costs of $1.4 million and $5.7$7.3 million in marketing and advertising costs as we continue to build brand recognition across the globe.globe, partially offset by lower professional fees.
Other Expense
Other expenses increased as a result of $6.3 million of higher compensation costs including a Transaction completion bonus, equity-based compensation of $2.4$4.1 million and higher travelsoftware license expenses of $1.4 million.$2.8 million, partially offset by lower compensation costs.
42
Sponsored cost share decreased due to a lower share percentage and funding from the DOE, partially offset by increases in United States Trade and Development Agency and subrecipient cost share for other projects.
The price of the Warrants, which is used to calculate their fair value, has dropped by approximately 32% sincedecreased year-over year resulting in larger income in the Transaction.current period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
Since NuScale’s inception, we have incurred significant operating losses; we losses and have had negative operating cash flow during the twelve months ended December 31, 2022 and 2021; and we have an accumulated deficit of $182.1$240.5 million, aswith negative operating cash flows. As of December 31, 2022. Management expects that operating losses2023, we had cash and negative cash flows may increase becauseequivalents of additional costs$120.3 million and expenses relatedrestricted cash of $5.1 million with no debt, while using 183.3 million of cash in operations. Historically, our primary sources of cash included investment capital, DOE and other government sponsored cost share agreements to support the advancement of the Company’s SMR technology both domestically and abroad. As we transition from a focus on research and development to commercialization of our technology, the Company is focusing on revenue producing commercial contracts. These factors combined with the execution of the Release Agreement with CFPP LLC have impacted our cash flow from operations during the year ended December 31, 2023 and on our forecasted cash flow from operations during the development of market and strategic relationships with other companies.2024 fiscal year.
Comparison of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 20222023 and 20212022
The following table sets forth the primary sources and uses of cash and cash equivalents for the periods presented below:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | $ | (148,609) | $ | (99,162) | (47,235) | ||||||||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | (52,332) | (1,952) | (3,526) | ||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 368,064 | 173,344 | 38,494 | ||||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | 167,123 | $ | 72,230 | $ | (12,267) | |||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | $ | (183,254) | $ | (148,609) | (99,162) | ||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 48,275 | (52,332) | (1,952) | ||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 16,127 | 368,064 | 173,344 | ||||||||||||||
| Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | $ | (118,852) | $ | 167,123 | $ | 72,230 | |||||||||||
Cash Flows used in Operating Activities
Net cash used in our operating activities increased during 2022year ended December 31, 2023 due to the Release Agreement payment to CFPP LLC in the amount of $49.8 million, partially offset by a larger net loss, an increase in commercial work (which resulted in growth in receivables)buildup of our accounts payables and a larger prepaid assetaccruals associated with the D&O insurance required as a newly public company. In addition, the growth in payables and accruals slowed in 2022 due to less DOE cost-share work in the fourth quartermanufacture of the 2022 fiscal year. These changes were partially offset by the utilization of previously deferred DOE cost share during 2021.our long-lead materials.
43
Cash Flows used in Investing Activities
Investing cash flows generally reflect capital expenditures on computer equipment and software. However, in 2022, we invested $50.0$50 million in short-term investments, while in 2023, we sold those short-term investments.
Cash Flows provided by Financing Activities
During 2023, our cash provided by financing activities consisted of proceeds from our ATM sales and the exercise of options, while in 2022 the majority of the net cash provided by financing activities consisted of proceeds from the Transaction, with another $28.7 million received for the exercise of warrants and options. For the year ended December 31, 2021, our financing cash flows consisted of $192.5 million for the sale of convertible preferred units offset by the repayment of $20.0 million of debt to Fluor.
Commitments and Contractual Obligations
We do not have any material commitments and contractual obligations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Preparation of the financial statements requires our management to make a number of judgments, estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amount of expenses, assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We consider an accounting judgment, estimate or assumption to be critical when (1) the estimate or assumption is complex in nature or requires a high degree of judgment and (2) the use of different judgments, estimates and assumptions could have a material impact on our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 3 within our “Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements”. Additional information about our critical accounting policies follows:
Revenue Recognition
In addition to advancing the commercialization of our SMR, we provide engineering services to customers.
We recognize fixed price contract revenue with multiple performance obligations as each obligation is completed. We allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation using an estimate of the stand-alone selling price of each distinct service in the contract. Revenue recognized on contracts that has not been billed to customers is classified as a current asset under accounts and other receivables on the consolidated balance sheet. Amounts billed to clients in excess of revenue recognized are classified as a current liability under deferred revenue on the consolidated balance sheet.
We recognize time and material contract revenue as incurred, while our cost plus fixed-fee contract revenue is recognized over time, matching continuous transfer of control to the customer. The Company accounts for these contracts as a single performance obligation and recognizes revenue using the percentage-of-completion (“POC”) method, based primarily on contract cost incurred to date compared to total estimated contract cost. The percentage-of-completionPOC method (an input method) is the most faithful depiction of the Company’s performance because it directly measures the value of the services transferred to the customer. Changes to total estimated contract cost or losses, if any, are recognized in the period in which they are determined as assessed at the contract level. Pre-contract costs are expensed as incurred unless they are expected to be recovered from the client.
Revenue recognition and profit is dependent upon a number of factors, including the accuracy of a variety of estimates made at the balance sheet date, such as engineering progress, material quantities, the achievement of milestones, penalty provisions, labor productivity and cost estimates. Variable consideration is included in the estimate of transaction price only to the extent that a significant reversal would not be probable. We continuously monitor factors that may affect the quality of our estimates, and material changes in estimates are disclosed accordingly.
We exclude all taxes assessed by governmental authorities from our measurement of transaction prices that are both
44
(i) imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and (ii) collected from customers. Accordingly, such tax amounts are not included as a component of revenue or cost of sales.
We generally provide limited warranties for work performed under our engineering contracts. The warranty periods typically extend for a limited duration following substantial completion of our work.
Emerging Growth Company Accounting Election
Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts EGCs from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect not to take advantage of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-EGCs, and any such election to not take advantage of the extended transition period is irrevocable. We expect to be an EGC at least through the end of 20232024 and will have the benefit of the extended transition period. We intend to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 3 in the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements for a summary of recently adopted and recently issued accounting standards and their related effects or anticipated effects on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Our Consolidated Financial Statements required by this Item are set forth in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
None
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our internalInternal control system wasover financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements prepared for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate due to change in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
45
In addition, because we are an “emerging growth company” as defined by Item 10under the terms of Regulation S-K.the JOBS Act of 2012, our independent registered public accounting firm is not required to issue an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or 15d-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K that hashave materially affected, or isare reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations of the Effectiveness of Control
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations of any control system, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within a company have been detected.
Item 9B. Other Information
Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions That Prevent Inspections
None
Part III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20232024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, except that:that the information regarding our executive officers required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K is set forth herein at Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K under the heading “Information about our Executive Officers.”
Code of Business Conduct
We have a code of business conduct that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. A copy of the code of conduct is available on our website at www.nuscalepower.com. The code of business conduct is a “code of ethics,” as defined in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K. Our Internet website address is provided as an inactive textual reference only. We will make any legally required disclosures regarding amendments to, or waivers of, provisions of its code of ethics on our website. Information contained on or accessible through our website is not a part of this proxy statement.annual report on Form 10-K.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20232024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owner and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20232024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20232024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20232024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)(1) Financial Statements: The financial statements filed as part of this report are listed on the index to financial statements on page F-1.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules: All schedules have been omitted because they are not required, not applicable, not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or the required information is otherwise included.
(a)(3) Exhibits: The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index are included or incorporated by reference in this report.
(a) Exhibits.
| Exhibit Number | Description | ||||||||||
| 2.1† | |||||||||||
| 2.2 | |||||||||||
| 2.3 | |||||||||||
| 3.1 | |||||||||||
| 3.2 | |||||||||||
| 4.1 | |||||||||||
| 4.2 | |||||||||||
| 4.3 | |||||||||||
| 10.1 | |||||||||||
| 10.2+ | |||||||||||
| 10.3 | |||||||||||
| 10.4 | |||||||||||
| 10.5 | |||||||||||
48
| 10.7 | |||||||||||
| 10.8 | |||||||||||
| 10.9+ | |||||||||||
| 10.10 | |||||||||||
| 10.11 | |||||||||||
| 10.12 | |||||||||||
| 10.13+ | |||||||||||
| 10.14+ | |||||||||||
49
| 10.25 | |||||||||||
| 10.26 | |||||||||||
| 10.27 | |||||||||||
| 10.28 | |||||||||||
| 10.29 | |||||||||||
| 21.1 | |||||||||||
| 23.1 | |||||||||||
| 31.1 | |||||||||||
| 31.2 | |||||||||||
| 32.1 | |||||||||||
| 32.2 | |||||||||||
| 97.1 | |||||||||||
| 101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | ||||||||||
| 101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | ||||||||||
| 101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | ||||||||||
| 101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | ||||||||||
| 101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | ||||||||||
| 101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | ||||||||||
| 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL). | ||||||||||
† Schedules and exhibits to this Exhibit omitted pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(2). The Registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit to the SEC upon request.
+ Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| NuScale Power Corporation | ||||||||
| Date | By: | /s/ John Hopkins | ||||||
| March 15, | Name: | John Hopkins | ||||||
| Title: | Chief Executive Officer | |||||||
| Date | By: | /s/ | ||||||
| March 15, | Name: | |||||||
| Title: | Chief Financial Officer | |||||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| NAME | POSITION | DATE | ||||||||||||
| /s/ James T. | Chairman and Director | March 15, | ||||||||||||
| James T. Hackett | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ John Hopkins | Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) | March 15, | ||||||||||||
| John Hopkins | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | March 15, | ||||||||||||
| /s/Alan L. Boeckmann | Director | March 15, | ||||||||||||
| Alan L. Boeckmann | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Alvin C. Collins, III | Director | March 15, | ||||||||||||
| Alvin C. Collins, III | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Kent Kresa | Director | March 15, | ||||||||||||
| Kent Kresa | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Christopher Sorrells | Director | March 15, | ||||||||||||
| Christopher Sorrells | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Jim Breuer | Director | March 15, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| Jim Breuer | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Kimberly O. Warnica | Director | March 15, | ||||||||||||
| Kimberly O. Warnica | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Bum Jin Chung | Director | March 15, | ||||||||||||
| Bum Jin Chung | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ Shinji Fujino | Director | March 15, | ||||||||||||
| Shinji Fujino | ||||||||||||||
| Audited Financial Statements of NuScale Power Corporation | Page(s) | ||||
F-2 | |||||
Consolidated | F-3 | ||||
Consolidated | F-4 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 | F-5 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, | F- | ||||
F- | |||||
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the ShareholdersStockholders and the Board of Directors of NuScale Power corporation:Corporation:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of NuScale Power Corporation (the Company) as of December 31, 20222023 and 2021,2022, the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022,2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 20222023 and 2021,2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022,2023, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinionopinion.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2018.
Portland, Oregon
March 15, 20232024
F-2
NuScale Power Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheet
| (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) | (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) | December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) | December 31, 2023 | December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ASSETS | ASSETS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current assets | Current assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 217,685 | $ | 77,094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Short-term investments | Short-term investments | 50,000 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted cash | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Prepaid expenses | Prepaid expenses | 5,531 | 4,147 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accounts and other receivables | Accounts and other receivables | 11,199 | 4,833 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total current assets | Total current assets | 284,415 | 86,074 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment, net | Property, plant and equipment, net | 4,770 | 4,960 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| In-process research and development | In-process research and development | 16,900 | 16,900 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Intangible assets, net | Intangible assets, net | 1,059 | 1,236 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Goodwill | Goodwill | 8,255 | 8,255 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-lead material work in process | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted cash | Restricted cash | 26,532 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other assets | Other assets | 6,704 | 3,772 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | Total assets | $ | 348,635 | $ | 121,197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current liabilities | Current liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 27,951 | $ | 22,375 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accrued compensation | Accrued compensation | 9,038 | 10,552 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Convertible note payable | — | 14,041 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-lead material liability | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other accrued liabilities | Other accrued liabilities | 1,568 | 1,440 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total current liabilities | Total current liabilities | 38,557 | 48,408 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Warrant liabilities | Warrant liabilities | 29,349 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deferred revenue | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noncurrent liabilities | Noncurrent liabilities | 2,786 | 2,976 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deferred revenue | 856 | 1,415 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities | Total liabilities | 71,548 | 52,799 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mezzanine equity | — | 2,140 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stockholders' Equity | Stockholders' Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Convertible preferred units | — | 819,694 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common units | — | 28,184 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, 332,000,000 shares authorized, 69,353,019 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2022 | 7 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, 179,000,000 shares authorized, 157,090,820 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2022 | 16 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stockholders' Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stockholders' Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, 332,000,000 shares authorized, 76,895,166 and 69,353,019 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, 332,000,000 shares authorized, 76,895,166 and 69,353,019 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, 332,000,000 shares authorized, 76,895,166 and 69,353,019 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, 179,000,000 shares authorized, 154,477,032 and 157,090,820 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | Additional paid-in capital | 296,748 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accumulated deficit | Accumulated deficit | (182,092) | (781,620) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Stockholders' Equity Excluding Noncontrolling Interests | Total Stockholders' Equity Excluding Noncontrolling Interests | 114,679 | 66,258 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noncontrolling interests | Noncontrolling interests | 162,408 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Stockholders' Equity | Total Stockholders' Equity | $ | 277,087 | $ | 66,258 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Liabilities, Mezzanine Equity and Stockholders' Equity | $ | 348,635 | $ | 121,197 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||