UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DCD.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 1)
10-K
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017January 3, 2021
OR
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ___________ to ____________
Commission File Number: 001-33174
CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware16-1287774
Delaware83-3804854
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
968 James Street Syracuse, New York13203
Syracuse,New York13203
(Address of principal executive offices)office)(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (315) 424-0513
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class:classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered:registered
Common Stock, par value $.01 per shareTASTThe NASDAQ Global Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes     ¨   No  x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes     ¨   No  x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and, “smaller reporting company”, and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated fileroAccelerated filerx
Large accelerated fileroAccelerated filerx
Non-accelerated fileroSmaller reporting companyo
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.ý



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  ý
As of March 5, 20183, 2021, Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. had 36,538,90353,337,104 shares of its common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding. The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates as of July 2, 20171, 2020 of Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. was $419,573,219.$178,742,600.




DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc's 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is
expected to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A no later than 120 days after the conclusion of Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc.'s fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2017
January 3, 2021, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this annual report.




EXPLANATORY NOTE



Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. (the “Company”) is filing this Amendment No. 1 (this "Form 10-K/A") to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 12, 2018 (the “Original Filing”), solely for correcting the form of the Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm regarding its opinions on the financial statements and internal control over financial reporting which were included in the report on the date of the Original Filing.  The change to the filed copy of the Deloitte Financial Statements Opinion does not affect Deloitte’s unqualified opinion on the Company's consolidated financial statements included in the Original Filing and this Form 10-K/A, or Deloitte’s unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.
In addition, pursuant to the rules of the SEC, the exhibit list included in Item 15 of Part IV of the Original Filing has been amended to contain currently-dated certifications from the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The certifications of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are attached as exhibits to this Form 10-K/A.
For ease of reference, this Form 10-K/A amends and restates the Original Filing in its entirety, making only the amendments described above. No other amendments have been made to the Original Filing and the Company is not amending its consolidated financial statements or any other part of, or otherwise updating any other disclosures made in, the Original Filing. This Form 10-K/A speaks as of the original filing date of the Original Filing and does not reflect any events that may have occurred subsequent to the original filing date. Accordingly, this Form 10-K/A should be read in conjunction with our other filings made with the SEC subsequent to the filing of the Original Filing, including any amendments to those filings.




CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
FORM 10-K/A10-K
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017JANUARY 3, 2021
 
Page



1


PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PART I
Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A,10-K we refer to Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. as “Carrols Restaurant Group” and, together with its direct and indirect consolidated subsidiary,subsidiaries, as “we”, “our”, “us” and “us”the "Company" unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires. Any reference to “Carrols” refers toCarrols Restaurant Group, Inc. is a holding company and conducts all of our operations through our wholly-owned subsidiary,subsidiaries Carrols Corporation a Delaware corporation,(“Carrols”) and its consolidated subsidiary, unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires. Any reference to “Carrols LLC” refers to Carrols' directwholly-owned subsidiary, Carrols LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, unless otherwise indicated orand Carrols LLC's wholly-owned subsidiary Republic Foods, Inc., a Maryland corporation ("Republic Foods"), and effective on April 30, 2019, New CFH, LLC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. New CFH LLC's material direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries include Frayser Quality, LLC and Nashville Quality, LLC (together with New CFH LLC's immaterial subsidiaries, collectively, "New CFH"). Unless the context otherwise requires.
We refer to our restaurants acquired over the past three years in 2015, 2016requires, Carrols Restaurant Group and 2017 as our "acquired restaurants". All of our other restaurants, including restaurants acquired prior to 2015,its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries are collectively referred to as our "legacy restaurants".the “Company.” All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
We use a 52 or 53 week fiscal year ending on the Sunday closest to December 31. Our fiscal years ended December 29, 2013, December 28, 2014, January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017, December 30, 2018 and December 29, 2019 each contained 52 weeks. Our fiscal year ended January 3, 20162021 contained 53 weeks.
At January 3, 2021 we operated, as franchisee, 1,009 Burger King® restaurants in 23 Northeastern, Midwestern, Southcentral and Southeastern states and 65 Popeyes® restaurants in seven Southeastern states.
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A,10-K, we refer to information, forecasts and statistics regarding the restaurant industry and to information, forecasts and statistics from Nation's Restaurant News, the U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. We operate our Burger King® restaurants under franchise agreements with Burger King Corporation ("BKC") and our Popeyes® restaurants under franchise agreements with Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc. ("PLK"). Any reference to BKC"BKC" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A10-K refers to Burger King Worldwide, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Burger King Corporation and its parent company Restaurant Brands International, Inc., which is sometimes referred to as "RBI." Any reference to PLK refers to Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc. and its indirect parent company, RBI. Unless otherwise indicated, information regarding Burger King, BKC, Popeyes and PLK in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A10-K has been made publicly available by BKC.

RBI.
This 20172020 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A10-K contains statements which constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Statements that are predictive in nature or that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions are forward-looking statements. Words such as “may”, “might”, “will”, “should”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “intend”, “estimate”, “hope”, “plan” or similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, expressions of our strategies, intentionsintentions; plans or plansguidance are also forward-looking statements. These statements reflect management's best judgment based on current views with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties, both known and unknown. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their date. Actual results could differ materially from those stated or implied in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, included but not limited to, the factors discussed in Item 1A-Risk Factors. We believe important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include the following, in addition to other risks and uncertainties discussed herein:
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic;
Effectiveness of the Burger King® and Popeyes® advertising programs and the overall success of the Burger KingKing® brand;
Increases in food costs and other commodity costs;
Competitive conditions, including pricing pressures, couponing,discounting, aggressive marketing and the potential impact of competitors’ new unit openings and promotions on sales of our restaurants;
Our ability to integrate any restaurants we acquire;
2


Regulatory factors;
Environmental conditions and regulations;
General economic conditions, particularly in the retail sector;
Weather conditions;
Fuel prices;
Significant disruptions in service or supply by any of our suppliers or distributors;
Changes in consumer perception of dietary health and food safety;


Labor and employment benefit costs, including the effects of minimum wage increases, healthcare reform and changes in the Fair Labor Standards Act;
The outcome of pending or future legal claims or proceedings;
Our ability to manage our growth and successfully implement our business strategy;
Our inabilityability to service our indebtedness;
Our borrowing costs and credit ratings, which may be influenced by the credit ratings of our competitors;
The availability and terms of necessary or desirable financing or refinancing and other related risks and uncertainties;
Factors that affect the restaurant industry generally, including recalls if products become adulterated or misbranded, liability if our products cause injury, ingredient disclosure and labeling laws and regulations, reports of cases of food borne illnesses such as “mad cow” disease, and the possibility that consumers could lose confidence in the safety and quality of certain food products as well as negative publicity regarding food quality, illness, injury or other health concerns; and
Other factors discussed under Item 1A - "Risk Factors" and elsewhere herein.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
Our Company
We are one of the largest restaurant companies in the United States and have been operating restaurants for more than 5560 years. We are the largest Burger King® franchisee in the United States, based on number of restaurants, and have operated Burger King restaurants since 1976. As of December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, we owned and operated 8071,009 Burger KingKing® restaurants located in 1723 Northeastern, Midwestern, Southcentral and Southeastern states and 65 Popeyes® restaurants in seven Southeastern states.
For a discussion of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, please refer to "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations".
Burger King.Burger King restaurants feature the popular flame-broiled Whopper® sandwich, as well as a variety of hamburgers, chicken and other specialty sandwiches, french fries, salads, breakfast items, snacks, smoothies, frappessoft drinks and other offerings. We believe that our size, seasoned management team, extensive operating infrastructure, experience and proven operating disciplines differentiate us from many of our competitors as well as many other Burger King operators.
According to BKC,RBI, as of December 31, 20172020 there were a total of 16,76718,625 Burger King restaurants, of which almost all were franchised and 7,2267,081 were located in the United States. Burger King is the second largest quick service hamburger restaurant chain in the world (as measured by number of restaurants) and we believe that the Burger King brand is one of the world's most recognized consumer brands. Burger King restaurants have a distinctive image and are generally located in high-traffic areas throughout the United States. Burger King restaurants are designed to appeal to a broad spectrum of consumers, with multiple day-part meal segments targeted to different groups of consumers. We believe that the competitive attributes of Burger King restaurants include significant brand recognition, convenience of location, quality, speed of service and price.
3


We operate our restaurants under franchise agreements with BKC. Our Burger King restaurants are typically open seven days per week and generally have operating hours ranging from 6:00 am to midnight on Sunday to Wednesday and to 2:00 am1:00AM on Thursday to Saturday. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic during 2020, we reduced operating hours at many of our Burger King restaurants, primarily breakfast and late night. By the end of 2020, we had restored operating hours at our Burger King restaurants with the exception of late night, where we are closing a few hours earlier than pre-pandemic operations due to decreased local demand.
Our existing restaurants consist of one of several building types with various seating capacities. Our typical freestanding restaurant contains approximately 2,600 square feet with seating capacity for 60 to 70 customers,guests, has drive-thru service windows and has adjacent parking areas. As of December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, almost all of our restaurants were freestanding. We operate our
Popeyes. Popeyes Restaurants are quick-service restaurants under franchise agreementsoffering primarily a limited menu of lunch and dinner products, and in certain restaurants breakfast products. Popeyes distinguishes itself with BKC.a unique “Louisiana” style menu that features a fried chicken sandwich, spicy chicken, chicken tenders, biscuits, fried shrimp and other seafood, red beans and rice and other quick-service menu items. According to RBI, as of December 31, 2020, there were 3,451 Popeyes restaurants worldwide and 2,608 Popeyes restaurants in the United States.
Our acquisitionPopeyes restaurants are generally freestanding locations with approximately 2,500 to 3,200 square feet with seating capacity for 50 to 60 guests and a drive-thru. Our Popeyes restaurants are typically open seven days per week with operating hours of 278 Burger King restaurants10:00 am to 10:00 pm Sunday through Thursday and 10:00 am to 11:00 pm on May 30, 2012 from BKC, which we refer to as the "2012 acquisition", included BKC's assignment to us of its right of first refusal on franchise restaurant transfers in 20 states as follows: Connecticut (except Hartford county), Delaware, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts (except for Middlesex, NorfolkFriday and Suffolk counties), Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York (except for Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Queens, Richmond, Suffolk and Westchester counties), North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Vermont, Virginia, Washington DC and West Virginia (the "ROFR") pursuant to an operating agreement with BKC dated May 30, 2012, and which was amended on January 26, 2015 and December 17, 2015, which we refer to as the "amended operating agreement".Saturday. In addition, pursuantresponse to the amendedCOVID-19 pandemic during 2020, we reduced operating hours at many of our Popeyes restaurants, primarily late night. By the end of 2020, we had restored operating hours at our Popeyes restaurants with the exception of a few locations where we are still closing a few hours earlier than pre-pandemic operations due to decreased local demand.


operating agreement, BKC granted us, onDuring 2019, we acquired 234 restaurants in three separate transactions. During 2018, we acquired a non-exclusive basis, franchise pre-approval to acquiretotal of 44 restaurants from Burger Kingother franchisees in the 20 states covered by the ROFR until we operate 1,000 Burger King restaurants. Newly constructed or acquired restaurants beyond 1,000 or acquisitions in states not subject to the ROFR would be subject to BKC's customary approval process. The amended operating agreement also required us to remodel 455 Burger King restaurants to BKC's "20/20" restaurant image by December 31, 2016 and as of that date, we had complied with this remodel requirement.
four separate transactions. During 2017, we acquired a total of 64 restaurants from other franchisees in three separate transactions. In 2016, we acquired 56 restaurants in seven separate transactions, and in 2015 we acquired 55 Burger King restaurants in eight separate transactions.
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, our restaurants generated total revenuesrestaurant sales of $1,088.5$1,547.5 million, which included $28.4 million from the 53rd week in 2020 and ourwas impacted by significant sales declines we experienced in March (-16.8%) and April (-21.7%) of 2020 during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. In fiscal 2020, comparable restaurant sales increased 5.2%at our Burger King restaurants decreased 2.8% and at our Popeyes restaurants decreased 0.1%. Our average annual restaurant sales for all restaurants were approximately $1,388,000$1.4 million per restaurant.restaurant in fiscal 2020.
2019 Cambridge Acquisition. On April 30, 2019, we completed a merger with New CFH, a former subsidiary of Cambridge Franchise Holdings, LLC ("Cambridge"), and acquired 165 Burger King® restaurants, 55 Popeyes® restaurants and six convenience stores (the "Cambridge Acquisition"). Cambridge received a total of approximately 14.9 million shares of our common stock, after the automatic conversion of 10,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock that Cambridge initially received in the Cambridge Acquisition. All shares of common stock issued to Cambridge are subject to a two year restriction on sale or transfer subject to certain limited exceptions. As part of the transaction, Cambridge designated two Cambridge executives who joined the Company's Board of Directors upon completion of the Cambridge Acquisition.
Area Development Agreements. The Company, Carrols, Carrols LLC and BKC entered into a new Area Development Agreement (the "ADA") which commenced on April 30, 2019 and was to end on September 30, 2024 and which superseded the Operating Agreement dated as of May 30, 2012, as amended, between Carrols LLC and BKC. The ADA was amended and restated by all parties on January 4, 2021 (the "Amended ADA").
Under the ADA, Carrols LLC had agreed to open, build and operate a total of 200 new Burger King restaurants including 32 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2020, 41 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2021, 41 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2022, 40 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2023 and 39 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2024, subject to and in accordance with the terms of the ADA. Carrols LLC had also agreed under the ADA to remodel or upgrade a total of 748 Burger King restaurants to BKC’s Burger King of Tomorrow restaurant image, including 130 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2020, 118 additional Burger King restaurants by September
4


30, 2021, 131 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2022, 138 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2023 and 141 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2024, subject to and in accordance with the terms of the ADA.
These development commitments were substantially reduced in the Amended ADA. Pursuant to the Amended ADA, Carrols LLC agreed to open, build and operate a total of 50 new Burger King restaurants, 80% of which must be in Kentucky, Tennessee and Indiana. This includes four Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2021, 10 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2022, 12 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2023, 12 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2024 and 12 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2025.
In addition, pursuant to the Amended ADA, BKC granted Carrols LLC franchise pre-approval to build new Burger King restaurants or acquire Burger King restaurants from Burger King franchisees with respect to 500 Burger King restaurants in the aggregate in (i) Kentucky, Tennessee and Indiana (excluding certain geographic areas in Indiana) and (ii) (a) 16 states, which include Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont and Virginia (subject to certain exceptions for certain limited geographic areas within certain states) and (b) any other geographic locations that Carrols LLC enters after the commencement date of the Amended ADA pursuant to BKC procedures subject to certain limitations.
Pursuant to the ADA and for a cost of $3.0 million, BKC had assigned to Carrols LLC the right of first refusal on the sale of franchisee-operated restaurants in 16 states and a limited number of counties in four additional states, and granted franchise pre-approval to acquire Burger King restaurants until the date that we have acquired more than an aggregate of an additional 500 Burger King restaurants excluding those restaurants we acquired in the Cambridge Acquisition ("ADA ROFR"). The ADA ROFR was terminated in connection with the Amended ADA and an impairment charge of $2.0 million for the unamortized value remaining from the payment for the ADA ROFR was recorded in 2020.
BKC agreed to contribute $10 million to $12 million for upgrades of approximately 50 to 60 Burger King restaurants in 2019 and 2020 where BKC is the landlord on the lease for such Burger King restaurants operated by Carrols LLC or an affiliate. Most of these restaurants had already been remodeled to the 20/20 image. We received $10.0 million from BKC under this arrangement in 2019.
On October 1 of each year following the commencement date of the ADA, Carrols LLC was required to pay BKC pre-paid franchise fees in the following amounts to be applied to new Burger King restaurants opened and operated by Carrols LLC: (a) $350,000 on the commencement date of the ADA, (b) $1,600,000 on October 1, 2019, (c) $2,050,000 on October 1, 2020, (d) $2,050,000 on October 1, 2021, (e) $2,000,000 on October 1, 2022 and (f) $1,950,000 on October 1, 2023. The Amended ADA eliminated the requirement for any prepayments due and payable on and after October 1, 2020, and the $0.6 million balance of prepaid franchise fees paid under the ADA that had not yet been applied to new restaurant development was forfeited.
Through the Cambridge Acquisition, we have also assumed a development agreement for Popeyes, which includes an assignment by PLK of its right of first refusal under its franchise agreements with its franchisees for acquisitions in two southern states, as well as a development commitment to open, build and operate approximately 80 new Popeyes® restaurants over six years.
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe we have the following competitive strengths:
Largest Burger King Franchisee in the United States. We are the largest Burger King franchisee in the United States based on number of restaurants, and believe we are well positioned to leverage the scale and marketing of one of the most recognized brands in the restaurant industry. We believe the geographic dispersion of our restaurants provides us with stability and enhanced growth opportunities in many of the markets in which we operate. We also believe that our large number of restaurants increases our ability to effectively manage the awareness of the Burger King brand in certain markets through our ability to influence local advertising and promotional activities.


5


Operational Expertise. We have been operating Burger King restaurants since 1976 and have developed sophisticated information and operating systems that enable us to measure and monitor key metrics for operational performance, sales and profitability that may not be available to other restaurant operators. Our focus on leveraging our operational expertise, infrastructure and systems allows us to optimize the performance of our restaurants and restaurants that we may acquire.acquire or open. Our size and history with the Burger King brand enable us to effectively track operating metrics and leverage best practices across our organization. We believe that our experienced management team, operating culture, effective operating systems and infrastructure enable us to operate more efficiently than many other Burger King operators, resultingoperators. We also believe we will be able to leverage our operational expertise to the Popeyes restaurants acquired in higher restaurant margins and improved overall financial results.2019.


Consistent Operating History and Financial Strength. We believe that the quality and sophistication of our restaurant operations have drivenhelped drive our strong restaurant level performance. Comparable restaurant sales for our restaurants have generally outperformed the Burger King system. Our strong restaurant level operations coupled with our financial management capabilities have resulted in consistent and stable cash flows.flows under most economic circumstances. We have demonstrated our ability to prudently manage our capital structure and financial leverage through a variety of economic cycles. We believe that our cash flow from operations, cash balances and the availability of revolving credit borrowings under our amended senior credit facilitySenior Credit Facilities are sufficient to fund our ongoing operations and capital expenditures.


Two Distinct BrandBrands with Global Recognition, Innovative Marketing and New Product Development. As a Burger King franchisee, we benefit from, and rely on, BKC's extensive marketing, advertising and product development capabilities to drive sales and generate increased restaurant traffic. Over the years, BKC has launched innovative and creative multimedia advertising campaigns and products that highlight the popular relevance of the Burger King brand. BKC has also introduced promotions that leverage both value and premium menu offerings as well as providing a platform for new premium sandwich offerings. We believe these campaigns continue to positively impact the brand today as BKC focuses on offering a well-balanced value menu and premium sandwich promotional mix and remains committed to focusing on fewer but more impactful new product launches, including a new hand-breaded crispy chicken sandwich and limited time offers, both of which continue to show positive trends. BKC is also aggressively working with franchisees throughout the system to encourage the renovation and remodeling of restaurants to BKC's 20/20current image, which we believe will continue to increase customer traffic and restaurant sales. In 2020, BKC assisted with the Company’s launch of delivery options for our guests. BKC negotiated distribution and operational agreements with major delivery platform providers and introduced its own white label mobile application that allowed us to quickly provide this option to our guests. In 2021, BKC is launching a loyalty program for use by its franchisees that we believe will reduce coupon clutter and provide incentives for guests to visit our restaurants with greater frequency and during lower traffic periods.


With regard to the Popeyes brand, which is owned by PLK, a subsidiary of RBI, the successful development and launch of a new chicken sandwich in 2019 has not only driven higher sales but we believe has also attracted a new demographic of guests to the existing customer base which will enhance restaurant sales and new restaurant development opportunities.

Strategic Relationship with Burger King Corporation.    Corporation and RBI. We believe that the structure of the 2012 acquisition of 278 restaurants from BKC and the 2019 Cambridge Acquisition strengthened our well-established relationship with BKC and RBI and has further aligned our common interests to grow our


business. WeIn 2021, we intend to continue to expand our restaurant base over the long term by making acquisitions, including acquisitions resulting from the exercise of the ROFR as well as other negotiatedselective acquisitions under our pre-approval rights. The consideration to BKC associated with the 2012 acquisition included a preferred stock equity interest in Carrols Restaurant Group, which is held by BKC Stockholders (as defined below) and convertible into approximately 20.5%15.0% of ourthe outstanding shares of our common stock.stock (after giving effect to such conversion). Since the 2012 acquisition, two of BKC's or RBI's senior executives have served on our Board of Directors. Jose Cil, BrandChristopher Finazzo, President Burger King,of BKC, Americas and Matthew Dunnigan, Chief Financial Officer of Restaurant Brands International Inc., the indirect parent company of BKC, currently serve on our boardBoard of directors.Directors. Our restaurants represented approximately 11.2%14.2% of the Burger King locations in the United States as of December 31, 2017.January 3, 2021. We believe that the combination of our rights under the operating agreement, BKC'sAmended ADA, RBI's equity interest and its board level
6


representation will continue to reinforce the alignment of our common interests with BKC forand Popeyes over the long term.


Multiple Growth Levers. We believe our historical track record of acquiring and integrating restaurants and our commitment to remodel our restaurants provides multiple avenues to grow our business. With more than 55 years of restaurant operating experience, we have successfully grown our business through acquisitions. We have experienced increases in comparable restaurant sales, increased restaurant-level profitability and improved operating metrics at the restaurants we have acquired in the last five years. In addition, we have remodeled a total of 523 restaurants to BKC’s 20/20 restaurant image as of December 31, 2017 which we believe has improved our guests’ overall experience and increased customer traffic. At December 31, 2017, 618 of our restaurants had the BKC 20/20 image, which includes restaurants converted prior to our acquisition.

Experienced Burger King Management Team with a Proven Track Record. We believe that our senior management team's extensive experience in the restaurant industry and its long and successful history of developing, acquiring, integrating and operating quick-service restaurants provide us with a competitive advantage. Our management team has a successful history of integrating acquired restaurants, and over the past 20 years, we have significantly increased the number of Burger King restaurants we own and operate, largely through acquisitions. Our operations are overseen by our Chief Executive Officer, Dan Accordino, who has over 4045 years of Burger King and quick-service restaurant experience, aand our new Chief Operating Officer, Carl Hauch, who joined us in February of 2021 and has over 20 years of experience in restaurant and retail operations, most recently in the Wendy's system. Additionally, we have two Burger King Divisional VP,Vice Presidents and nine13 Regional Directors that collectively have an average of 2722 years of Burger King restaurant experience. Our 111148 Burger King district managers, thatwho have an average tenure of over 16 years in the Burger King system, support the Regional Directors. Our operations management is further supported by our infrastructure of financial, information systems, real estate, human resources and legal professionals.

Multiple Growth Levers. We believe our historical track record of acquiring and integrating restaurants and our long-term strategy to remodel, upgrade and open new restaurants provide multiple avenues to grow our business. With more than 60 years of restaurant operating experience, we have successfully grown our business through acquisitions and integrated the restaurants we acquired. We have experienced increases in comparable restaurant sales, increased restaurant-level profitability and improved operating metrics at the restaurants we have acquired in the last five years.
Our Business Strategies
Our primary business strategies are as follows:
Selectively Acquire and Develop Additional Burger King and Popeyes Restaurants. After enduring the challenges 2020 brought to our industry as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have substantially improved our liquidity position, we have reduced our near-term capital expenditure requirements and we continue to deleverage. As a result, we believe we have the flexibility to grow our business organically and through acquisitions in a manner that will optimize our growth potential while generating consistent and enhanced free cash flow and keeping our leverage in check.
As of December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, we operated 8071,009 Burger King restaurants, making us one of the largest Burger King franchiseesfranchisee in the world. We acquired the ROFR in the 2012 acquisitionUnited States, and were granted certain pre-approval rights65 Popeyes® restaurants. Under our Amended ADA with BKC, we are pre-approved to acquire additional franchisedup to 500 Burger King restaurants in territories where we currently operate and have agreed to developbuild 50 new restaurants.restaurants over the next five years. Due to the number of restaurants and franchisees in the Burger King system and our historical success in acquiring and integrating restaurants, we believe that there is considerable opportunity for future growth.growth through acquisitions. There are more than 2,000 Burger King restaurants we do not own in states in which we have the ROFR and pre-approval rights. Furthermore, we believe there are additional Burger King restaurants in states not subject to the ROFRbeyond our territories that could be attractive acquisition candidates, subject to BKC's customary approval. We believe that the assignment of the ROFR and the pre-approval to acquire and develop additional restaurants provide us with the opportunity to significantly expand our ownership of Burger King restaurants in the future.
While we may evaluate and discuss potential acquisitions of additional restaurants from time to time, we currently have no understandings, commitments or agreements with respect to any material acquisitions. We may be required to obtain additional financing to fund future acquisitions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional financing, if necessary, on acceptable terms or at all.
Improve Profitability of Restaurants We Acquire by Leveraging Our Existing Infrastructure and Best-Practices. For acquired restaurants, we believe we can realize benefits from economies of scale, including leveraging our existing infrastructure across a larger number of restaurants. Additionally, we believe that our skilled management team, sophisticated information technology, operating systems and training and development programs support our ability to enhance operating efficienciesmargins at any restaurants we may acquire.these restaurants. We have demonstrated our ability to increase

7



the profitability of acquired restaurants and we believe that, over time, that we will improve profitability and operational efficiency at the restaurants we have acquired and may acquire.acquire in the future.
Increase Restaurant Sales and Customer Traffic. BKC has identified and implemented a number of strategies to increase brand awareness, increase market share, improve overall operations and drive sales. These strategies are central to our strategic objectives to deliver profitable growth.
Products. The strength of the BKC menu has been built on a distinct flame-grilled cooking platform to make better tasting hamburgers. We believe that BKC intends to continue to optimize the menu by focusing on core products, such as the flagship Whopper® sandwich, while maintaining a balance between value promotions and premium limited time offerings to drive sales and traffic. Recentproduct innovation has included the new hand-breaded Chicken Sandwich and the Impossible Whopper, a vegetable based product that has attracted new customers. The new hand-breaded Chicken Sandwich is one of the largest anticipated product introductions to our menu.In addition, BKC has implemented a multi-tier balanced marketing approach with value and premium offerings, pairing value promotions such as the $1.49 10-piece chicken nugget promotion and a 2 cheeseburger meal deal, with premium limited time Burger offerings, such as the Bacon King and Steakhouse King sandwiches.sandwich offerings. Promotional initiatives in 20172020 included a 2 for $4 breakfast Croissan'wich offer, 2 for $6 Whopper sandwiches and most recently the 2 for $6 Mix and Match, the 2 for $5 Mix and Match, and the 2 for $4 and 2 for $5 Biscuit/Croissan'wich. In 2021, we are looking forward to a new Value Menu featuring the Whopper$1.00 Bacon Cheeseburger as well as the Sourdough platform which includes the Sourdough KING and Crispy Chicken sandwich. There havea new Sourdough Breakfast Sandwich.BKC intends to accelerate the breakfast daypart with a new French Toast Sandwich. In 2021, BKC also beenintends to introduce a number of enhancementsnew loyalty program entitled “Royal Perks” to food preparation proceduresentice guests to improve the quality of BKC's existing products.visit more often and receive personalized offers. These new menu platforms andin addition to recent quality improvements form the backbone ofsupport BKC's strategy to appeal to a broader consumer base and to increase restaurant sales.
Image. We believe that re-imaged restaurants increase curb appeal and result in increased restaurant sales. BKC's 20/20current restaurant image features a fresh, sleek, eye-catching design which incorporates easy-to-navigate digital menu boards in the dining room, streamlined merchandising at the drive-thru and flat screen televisions in the dining area. We believe thethat restaurant remodeling plan has improved our guests' dining experience and increased customer traffic. AsWe believe the customer experience will be further enhanced from the upgrades to the Burger King of December 31, 2017Tomorrow image that include a totaldouble drive-thru (where applicable), certain modifications to the exterior image and the installation of 618 of our restaurants had the 20/20 restaurant image, which includes restaurants re-imaged prior to our acquisition.
exterior digital menu boards.
Advertising and Promotion. We believe that we will continue to benefit from BKC's advertising support of its menu items, product enhancement and re-imaging initiatives. BKC has established a data driven marketing process which has focused on driving restaurant sales and traffic, while targeting a broad consumer base with inclusive messaging. This strategy uses multiple touch points to advertise our products, including digital advertising, social media and on-line videomobile display, in addition to traditional television advertising.advertising and streaming audio. BKC has a food-centric marketing strategy which focuses consumers on the food offerings, the core asset, and balances value promotions and premium limited time offerings to drive profitable restaurant sales and traffic.
Operations. We believe that improving restaurant operations and enhancing the customer experience are key components to increasing the profitability of our restaurants. We believe we will benefit from BKC's ongoing initiatives to improve food quality, simplify restaurant level execution, reduce restaurant labor costs and monitor operational performance, all of which are designed to improve the customer experience and increase customer traffic. In 2020, BKC implemented delivery services with major delivery providers as well as through its own mobile app. By the end of 2020, we were providing fully integrated delivery services at approximately 890 of our Burger King restaurants, based on the geographic availability of delivery services.
8

Strategically Remodel to Elevate Brand Profile and Increase Profit Potential. In 2018, we plan to remodel 30 to 35 locations to BKC's 20/20 image, to rebuild 5 to 7 restaurants and to construct 10 to 15 new restaurants (including relocations of 2 to 3 existing restaurants). We believe there are opportunities to increase profitability by remodeling additional restaurants including restaurants that we have acquired or may acquire in the future.



Restaurant Economics
Selected restaurant operating data for our restaurants is as follows:
Year Ended  
Year Ended  
December 30, 2018December 29, 2019January 3, 2021
January 3, 2016 January 1, 2017 December 31, 2017
Average annual sales per restaurant (all restaurants) (1)$1,274,372
 $1,311,516
 $1,387,850
Legacy restaurants$1,274,607
 $1,312,234
 $1,393,662
Acquired restaurants$1,257,742
 $1,305,419
 $1,364,093
Average annual sales per restaurant (1)Average annual sales per restaurant (1)$1,449,047 $1,454,654 $1,435,531 
Average sales transaction$6.64
 $6.85
 $7.15
Average sales transaction$7.37 $7.62 $8.63 
Drive-through sales as a percentage of total sales66.0% 67.0% 67.9%Drive-through sales as a percentage of total sales68.4 %68.2 %86.1 %
Day-part sales percentages: 
  
  Day-part sales percentages:
Breakfast13.2% 13.8% 13.7%Breakfast13.5 %13.0 %11.5 %
Lunch32.8% 32.4% 32.3%Lunch31.9 %31.7 %32.6 %
Dinner20.4% 20.4% 20.6%Dinner20.9 %21.5 %22.6 %
Afternoon and late night33.6% 33.4% 33.4%
AfternoonAfternoon19.9 %20.1 %22.0 %
Late nightLate night13.8 %13.7 %11.3 %
 
(1)Average annual sales per restaurant are derived by dividing restaurant sales by the average number of restaurants operating during the period on a 52-week basis.
(1)Average annual sales per restaurant are derived by dividing restaurant sales by the average number of restaurants operating during the period on a 52-week basis for the years ended December 30, 2018 and December 29, 2019 or 53-week basis for the year ended January 3, 2021.
Restaurant Capital Costs
The initial cost of the franchise fee, equipment, seating, signage and other interior costs of a standard new Burger King and Popeyes restaurant currently is approximately $450,000$500,000 (which excludes the cost of land, the land, building and site improvements). In the markets in which we primarily operate, the cost of land generally ranges from $500,000 to $900,000$1,200,000 for Burger King restaurants and $500,000 to $1,000,000 for Popeyes restaurants and the cost of building and site improvements generally ranges from $850,000$1,000,000 to $1,025,000.$1,800,000 for both Burger King and Popeyes restaurants.
With respect to the development of freestanding restaurants, if we acquire the land toand construct the building, we typically seek to thereafter enter into an arrangement to sell and leaseback the land and building under a long-term lease. Historically, we have been able to acquire and finance many of our locations under such leasing arrangements. Where we are unable to purchase the underlying land, we enter into a long-term lease for the land followed by construction of the building using cash generated from our operations or with borrowings under our senior credit facility.Senior Credit Facilities (as defined below).
The cost of securing real estate and developing and equipping new restaurants can vary significantly and depends on a number of factors, including the local economic conditions and the characteristics of a particular site. Accordingly, the cost of opening new restaurants in the future may differ substantially from the historical cost of restaurants previously opened and the estimated costs above.
BKC's 20/20current image restaurant design draws inspiration from its signature flame-grilled cooking process and incorporates a variety of innovative elements to a backdrop that evokes the industrialwarm and welcoming look of the outdoors including corrugated metal, brick, wood and concrete. The cost of remodeling a restaurant to the BKC 20/20current image varies depending upon the age and condition of the restaurant and the amount of new equipment needed and can range from $250,000$600,000 to $650,000$1,400,000 per restaurant with a projected cost of approximately $550,000 per restaurant in 2017 and an average cost of $450,000 over the past three years.approximately $1.1 million per restaurant in 2020. The total cost of a remodel has increased over time due to construction cost increases, the addition of a second drive-thru lane at certain locations and the replacement of certain kitchen equipment at the time of the remodel which is incremental to the cost to upgrade to the BKC 20/20current image design. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Recent and Future Events Affecting our Results of Operations".
9


Site Selection
We believe that the location of our restaurants is a critical component of each restaurant's success. We evaluate potential new sites on many critical criteria including accessibility, visibility, costs, surrounding traffic patterns, competition and demographic characteristics. Our senior management determinesapproves the acceptabilityviability of all acquisition prospects and new sites, based upon analyses prepared by our real estate, financial and operations professionals.    


professionals and our return on investment requirements.
Seasonality
Our business is moderately seasonal due to regional weather conditions. Due to the location of our restaurants, sales are generally higher during the summer months than during the winter months.
10


Restaurant Locations
The following table details the locations of our 8071,009 Burger King restaurants as of December 31, 2017:January 3, 2021:
State
Total Restaurants
IllinoisAlabama19
IndianaArkansas88
KentuckyGeorgia36
MaineIllinois1516 
MarylandIndiana1792 
MassachusettsKentucky141 
MichiganLouisiana5317 
New JerseyMaine1015 
New YorkMaryland12829 
North CarolinaMassachusetts152
OhioMichigan11751 
PennsylvaniaMississippi6433 
South CarolinaMissouri32
TennesseeNew Jersey3110 
VermontNew York5125 
VirginiaNorth Carolina36157 
West VirginiaOhio3116 
TotalPennsylvania80761 
South Carolina42 
Tennessee109 
Vermont
Virginia66 
West Virginia
Total1,009 


The following table details the locations of our 65 Popeyes restaurants as of January 3, 2021:
StateTotal Restaurants  
Arkansas
Indiana
Kentucky
Louisiana
Mississippi33 
Tennessee18 
Virginia
Total65 

Operations
Management Structure
We conduct substantially all of our executive management, finance, marketing and operations support functions from our corporate headquarters in Syracuse, New York. Carrols Restaurant Group is led by our Chief Executive Officer and President, Daniel T. Accordino, who has over 4045 years of Burger King and quick-service restaurant experience at our company.
Our operations
11


Operations for our Burger King restaurants are overseen by oneour new Chief Operating Officer, Carl Hauch, who joined us in February of 2021 and has over 20 years of experience in restaurant and retail operations, most recently in the Wendy's system, as well as two Division VPVice Presidents and nine13 Regional Directors that have an average of over 2722 years of Burger King restaurant experience. Our 111148 district managers support the Regional Directors in the management of our Burger King restaurants. Operations for our Popeyes restaurants are overseen by two Regional Directors and nine district managers.
A district manager is responsible for the direct oversight of the day-to-day operations of an average of approximately seven to eight restaurants. Typically, district managers have previously served as restaurant managers at one of our restaurants. Regional directors, district managers and restaurant managers are compensated with a fixed salary plus an incentive bonus based upon the performance of the restaurants under their supervision, and for our regional directors and district managers, the combined performance of all of our restaurants. Typically,Most often, our restaurants are staffed with hourly employees who are supervised by a salaried general manager and one to three salaried assistant managers.


Training
We maintain a comprehensive training and development program for all of our personnel and provide both classroom and in-restaurant training for our salaried and hourly personnel. The program emphasizes system-wide operating procedures, food preparation methods, food safety and customer service standards. BKC's training and development programs are also available to us as a franchisee through web access in all of our restaurants.
Management Information Systems
Our sophisticated management information systems provide us with the ability to efficiently and effectively manage our restaurants and to ensure the consistent application of operating controls at our restaurants. Our size affords us the ability to maintain an in-house staff of information technology and restaurant systems professionals dedicated to continuously enhancing our systems. In addition, these capabilities allow us to quickly integrate restaurants that we acquire and achieve greater economies of scale and operating efficiencies.
We typically replace the POS systems at restaurants we acquire shortly after acquisition and implement our POS, labor and inventory management systems. Our restaurants employ touch-screen POS systems that are designed to facilitate accuracy and speed of order taking. These systems are user-friendly, require limited cashier training and improve speed-of-service through the use of conversational order-taking techniques. The POS systems are integrated with PC-based applications at the restaurant and hosted systems at our corporate office that are designed to facilitate financial and management control of our restaurant operations.
Our restaurant systems provide daily tracking and reporting of traffic counts, menu item sales, labor and food data including costs and inventories, and other key operating metrics for each restaurant. We communicate electronically with our restaurants on a continuous basis via a high-speed data network, which enables us to collect this information for use in our corporate management systems in near real-time. Our corporate headquarters manages systems that support all of our accounting, operating and reporting systems. We also operate a 24-hour, seven-day help desk at our corporate headquarters that enables us to provide systems and operational support to our restaurant operations as required. Among other things, our restaurant information systems provide us with the ability to:
monitor labor utilization and sales trends on a real-time basis at each restaurant, enabling the restaurant manager to effectively manage to our established labor standards on a timely basis;
reduce inventory shrinkage using restaurant-level inventory management systems and daily reporting of inventory variances;
analyze sales and product mix data to help restaurant managers forecast production levels throughout the day;
monitor day-part drive-thru speed of service at each of our restaurants;
allow the restaurant manager to produce day-part labor schedules based on the restaurant's historical sales patterns;
systematically communicate human resource and payroll data to our administrative offices for efficient centralized management of labor costs and payroll processing;
allow customers to place mobile and third-party delivery orders that integrate directly with the point-of-sale system;
employ centralized control over pricing, menu and inventory management activities at the restaurant utilizing the remote management capabilities of our systems;
12


take advantage of electronic commerce including ourthe ability to place orders with suppliers and to integrate detailed invoice, receiving and product data with our inventory and accounting systems;
provide analyses, reporting and tools to enable all levels of management to review a wide-range of financial, product mix and operational data; and
systematically analyze and report on detailed transactional data to help detect and identify potential theft.
Critical information from our systems is available in near real-time to our restaurant managers, who are expected to react quickly to trends or situations in their restaurant.restaurants. Our district managers also receive near real-time information for their respective restaurants and have access to key operating data on a remote basis using our corporate intranet-based reporting. Management personnel at all levels, from the restaurant manager through senior management, utilize and monitor key restaurant performance indicators that are also included in our restaurant-level incentive bonus plans.


Burger King and Popeyes Franchise Agreements
Each of our Burger King restaurants operates under a separate franchise agreement with BKC. Each of our Popeyes restaurants operates under a separate franchise agreement with PLK. Our franchise agreements with BKC and PLK generally require, among other things, that all restaurants comply with specified design criteria and operate in a prescribed manner, including utilization of thea standard Burger King menu. In addition, our Burger King franchise agreements generally require that our restaurants conform to BKC's current image and may provide for updating our restaurants during the tenth year of the agreements to conform to such current image, which may require significant expenditures.
These franchise agreements with BKC and PLK generally provide for an initial term of 20 years and currently have an initial franchise fee of $50,000. In the event that we terminate anya franchise agreement and close the related BKC restaurant prior to the expiration of its term, we generally are required to pay BKC an amount based on the net present value of the royalty stream that would have been realized by BKC had such franchise agreement not been terminated. AnyWith BKC's and PLK's respective approval, we can elect to extend franchise agreement, including renewals, can be extended at our discretionagreements for an additional 20-year term, with BKC's approval,20 year terms, provided that among other things, the restaurant meets the current Burger King operatingrestaurant image standard and image standards and that we are not in default under the terms of the franchise agreement. The franchise agreement fee for subsequent renewals for our Burger King and Popeyes restaurants is currently $50,000. BKC or PLK may terminate any of the franchise agreements if an act of default is committed by us under these agreements and such default is not cured. Defaults under the franchise agreements for our Burger King and Popeyes restaurants include, among other things, our failure to operate such Burger King restaurant in accordance with the operating standards and specifications established by BKC or PLK (including failure to use equipment, uniforms or decor approved by BKC)the respective franchisor), our failure to sell products approved or designated by BKC or PLK, our failure to pay royalties or advertising and sales promotion contributions as required, our unauthorized sale, transfer or assignment of such franchise agreement or the related restaurant, certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency with respect to us, conduct by us or our employees that has a harmful effect on the Burger King or Popeyes restaurant system, conviction of us or our executive officers for certain indictable offenses, our failure to maintain a responsible credit rating or our acquisition of an interest in any other hamburger restaurant business. At December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, we were not in default under any of our franchise agreements with BKC.BKC or PLK.
In order to obtain a successor franchise agreement with BKC and PLK, a franchisee is typically required to make capital improvements to the restaurant to bring it up to BKC's or PLK's current image standards. The cost of these improvements may vary widely depending upon the magnitude of the required changes and the degree to which we have made interim improvements to the restaurant. At December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, we had 4312 Burger King franchise agreements due to expire in 2018, 292021, 14 Burger King franchise agreements due to expire in 20192022 and 513 Burger King franchise agreements due to expire in 2023, as well as 32 that expired prior to the end of 2020. At January 3, 2021 we had two Popeyes franchise agreements set to expire in 2021, four Popeyes franchise agreements set to expire in 2022 and one Popeyes franchise agreement set to expire in 2023, as well as six Popeyes franchise agreements that expired prior to the end of 2020.
We believe that we will be able to satisfy BKC's and PLK's normal franchise agreement renewal criteria. Accordingly, we believe that renewal franchise agreements will be granted on a timely basis by BKC and PLK at
13


the expiration of our existing franchise agreements. Historically, BKC has granted all of our requests for successor franchise agreements. However, there can be no assurance that BKC and PLK will grant these requests in the future.
In recent years, the historical costs of improving our Burger King restaurants in connection with franchise renewals generally have ranged from $250,000$400,000 to $650,000$800,000 per restaurant. The average cost of our remodels to the 20/20 image in 20172020 was approximately $550,000$1.1 million per restaurant. The cost of remodels can vary depending upon the age and condition of the restaurant and the amount of new equipment needed. The cost of capital improvements made in connection with future franchise agreement renewals may differ substantially from past franchise renewals depending on the current image requirements established from time to time by BKC.BKC or PLK.
We believe that we will be able to satisfy BKC's normal franchise agreement renewal criteria. Accordingly, we believe that renewal franchise agreements will be granted on a timely basis by BKC at the expiration of our existing franchise agreements. Historically, BKC has granted all of our requests for successor franchise agreements. However, there can be no assurance that BKC will grant these requests in the future.
We evaluate the performance of our Burger King and Popeyes restaurants on an ongoing basis. With respect to franchise renewals, such evaluation depends on many factors, including our assessment of the anticipated future operating results of the subject restaurants and the cost of required capital improvements that we would need to commit for such restaurants. If we determine that a Burger King or Popeyes restaurant is under-performing, or that we do not anticipate an adequate return on the capital investment required to renew the franchise agreement, we may elect to close such restaurant. We may also relocate (offset) a restaurant within its trade area and build a new Burger King or Popeyes restaurant as part of the franchise renewal process. In 2017,2020, we closed 2134 Burger King restaurants, including 1one offset location. We currently expect to close between 20 to 25less than five Burger King restaurants in 2018,2021, excluding any relocations of existing restaurants. Our determination to close these restaurants is subject to further evaluation and may change.We may also elect to close additional restaurants in the future.
In addition to the initial franchise fee, we generally pay BKC and PLK a monthly royalty. The royalty rate for new Burger King restaurants and for successor franchise agreements is 4.5% of sales. The royalty rate for new Popeyes restaurants and for successor franchise agreements is 5.0% of sales. Royalty payments for restaurants acquired from other franchisees are based on the terms of existing franchise agreements being acquired, and may be less than 4.5%. The


royalty rate was increased from 3.5% to 4.5% of sales in 2000, and generally for restaurants that were in existence in 2000, becomes effective upon the renewal of the franchise agreement. Burger King royalties, as a percentage of restaurant sales, were 4.3% in 20172020, 2019 and 4.2%in both2016 and 2015.2018, respectively. We anticipate our Burger King and Popeyes royalties, as a percentage of restaurant sales, will be 4.3%approximately 4.4% in 20182021 as a result of the terms outlined above. Newly constructed Burger King restaurants developed pursuant to the ADA as well as the Amended ADA received and will receive a 1% royalty rate reduction for a four year period and certain remodeled restaurants under the ADA generally received and will receive a 0.75% royalty rate reduction for a five year period.
We also generally contribute 4% of restaurant sales from our Burger King and Popeyes restaurants to fund BKC's and PLK's national and regional advertising. Pursuant to the ADA and Amended ADA, newly constructed Burger King restaurants will receive a 3% advertising contribution reduction for four years and certain remodeled restaurants, excluding upgrades, will receive a 0.75% advertising contribution reduction for a five year period. BKC engagesand PLK engage in substantial national and regional advertising and promotional activities and other efforts to maintain and enhance the Burger King brand.both brands. From time to time we supplement BKC's marketing with our own local advertising and promotional campaigns. See “- Advertising,“Advertising, Products and Promotion” below.
Our franchise agreements with BKC and PLK do not give us exclusive rights to operate Burger King restaurants in any defined territory. Although we believe that BKC generally seeks to ensure that newly granted franchises do not materially adversely affect the operations of existing Burger King restaurants, we cannot assure you that franchises granted by BKC to third parties will not adversely affect any Burger King restaurants that we operate.
Except as permitted by the operating agreement, we are required to obtain BKC's consent before we acquire existing Burger King restaurants from other franchisees or develop new Burger King restaurants. BKC also has the right of first refusal to purchase any Burger King restaurant that is being offered for sale by a franchisee. However, pursuant to the operating agreement, BKC assigned the ROFR to us in 20 states and granted us franchise pre-approval to build new restaurants or acquire restaurants from franchisees until the date that we operate 1,000 restaurants. Historically, BKC has approved substantially all of our acquisitions of restaurants from other franchisees.
Advertising, Products and Promotion
BKC's marketing strategy is characterized by its HAVE IT YOUR WAY® service, TASTE IS KING® tag line, flame grilling, generous portions and competitive prices. Burger King restaurants feature flame-grilled hamburgers, the most popular of which is the Whopper® sandwich, a large, flame-grilled hamburger garnished with mayonnaise, lettuce, onions, pickles and tomatoes. The basic menu of all Burger King restaurants also includes a variety of hamburgers, chicken and other specialty sandwiches, french fries, onion rings, soft drinks, salads, breakfast items, snacks and other offerings. BKC and its franchisees have historically spent between 4% and 5% of their respective sales on marketing, advertising and promotion to sustain high brand awareness. BKC's marketing initiatives are designed to reach a diverse consumer base and BKC has continued to introduce a number of new and enhanced products to broaden menu offerings and drive customer traffic in all day parts.
We are generally required to contribute 4% of restaurant sales to an advertising fund utilized by BKC for its advertising, promotional programs
14


BKC's and public relations activities. BKC'sPLK's advertising programs consist of national campaigns supplemented by local advertising. BKC's and PLK's advertising campaigns are generally carried on television, radio and in circulated print media (national and regional newspapers and magazines). As a percentage of our restaurant sales advertising expense was 3.9% in 2020, 4.0% in 2019 and 4.1% in 2017, 4.4% in 2016 and 3.8% in 2015.2018. For 20182021, we expect total advertising expense to range betweenbe approximately 4.0% and 4.2% of total restaurant sales.
The efficiency and quality of advertising and promotional programs can significantly affect the quick-service restaurant businesses. We believe that one of the major advantages of being a Burger King franchisee is the value of the extensive national and regional advertising and promotional programs conducted by BKC. In addition to the benefits derived from BKC's advertising spending, we sometimes supplement BKC's advertising and promotional activities with our own local advertising and promotions, including the purchase of additional television, radio and print advertising. The concentration of our Burger King restaurants in many of our markets permits us to leverage advertising in those markets. We also utilize promotional programs targeted to our customers, such as combination value meals and discounted prices targeted to our customers, in order to create a flexible and directed marketing program.
Digital
BKC and PLK have invested heavily in launching a digital platform that integrates with major third-party delivery service providers and provides a seamless ordering, payment, delivery and drive thru experience for our guests. In the BKC and PLK platforms, guests can place orders through a website or mobile app and have the product ready for pickup or delivered by a third-party partner. Digital sales, including sales through the delivery platforms plus mobile order and pay, have been a strong growth driver and represented approximately 4.4% of our restaurant sales in the fourth quarter of 2020 and 3.1% of our sales for all of 2020. We are also installing outdoor digital menu boards in all drive thru locations. In 2020, we installed outdoor digital menu boards at 359 Burger King restaurants and expect to complete the remaining installation of outdoor digital menu boards at all of our Burger King and Popeyes restaurants by the first half of 2022. The menu boards integrate with the POS system and allow for artificial intelligence to help optimize the guest experience. BKC and PLK continue to invest in the digital platform and BKC intends to launch its Royal Perks loyalty program in 2021, which will be driven from its mobile app.
Suppliers
We are a member of a national purchasing cooperative, Restaurant Services, Inc., which we refer to as "RSI", created for the Burger King system. RSI is a non-profit independent purchasing cooperative that is responsible for sourcing our products and related supplies and managing relationships with approved distributors for the Burger King system. We use our purchasing power to negotiate directly with certain other vendors, to help obtain favorable pricing and terms for supplying our restaurants. For our Burger King restaurants, we are required to purchase all of our foodstuffs, paper goods and packaging materials from BKC-approved suppliers at prices negotiated by RSI. We currently primarily utilize mostly threefour distributors, Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc.,Lineage Foodservice Solutions, LLC, Reinhart Food Service L.L.C.L.L.C, McLane Company Inc., and MBM Food Service Inc.,Performance Foodservice, to supply


our Burger King restaurants with the majority of our foodstuffs and, asfoodstuffs. As of December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, such distributors supplied 42%34%, 29%28%, 28% and 29%10%, respectively, of our Burger King restaurants.
For our Popeyes restaurants we are a member of a national purchasing cooperative, Supply Management Services, Inc. ("SMS"). SMS is a non-profit independent purchasing cooperative that is responsible for sourcing certain of our products and managing relationships with approved distributors for the Popeyes system. Popeyes utilizes five distributors, two for poultry products and three for all other products. For our Popeyes restaurants, one distributor, Tyson Foods, supplies 75% of our poultry products. Another distributor, Customized Distribution Services, Inc. supplies 60 of our Popeyes restaurants with all non- poultry products.
We may purchase non-food items, such as kitchen utensils, equipment maintenance tools and other supplies, from any suitable source so long as such items meet BKC and PLK product uniformity standards. All BKC-approved and PLK-approved distributors are required to purchase foodstuffs and supplies from BKC-approved and PLK-approved manufacturers and purveyors. BKC isand PLK are each responsible for monitoring quality control and supervision of these manufacturers andthe applicable manufacturers. Each conducts regular visits to observe the preparation of foodstuffs and to perform various tests to ensure that only quality foodstuffs are sold to its approved suppliers. In addition, BKC coordinates and supervisesPLK coordinate and supervise audits of approved suppliers and distributors to determine continuing
15


product specification compliance and to ensure that manufacturing plant and distribution center standards are met. Although we believe that we have alternative sources of supply available to our restaurants, in the event anyfailure of a distributor or supplier for our restaurants was unable to service us, this could lead to a disruption of service or supply at our restaurants until a new distributor or supplier is engaged, which could have an adverse effect on our business.
Quality Assurance
Our operational focus is closely monitored to achieve a high level of customer satisfaction based on product quality, speed of service, order accuracy and quality of service. Our senior management and restaurant management staffs are principally responsible for ensuring compliance with BKC's and PLK's required operating procedures. We have uniform operating standards and specifications relating to the quality, preparation and selection of menu items, maintenance and cleanliness of the premises and employee conduct. In order to maintain compliance with these operating standards and specifications, we distribute detailed reports measuring compliance with various customer service standards and objectives to our restaurant operations management team, including feedback obtained directly from our customers through instructions given to them at the point of sale. The customer feedback is monitored by an independent agency and us and consists of evaluations of speed of service, quality of service, quality of our menu items and other operational objectives including the cleanliness of our restaurants. We also have our own staff that handle customer inquiries and complaints. The level of customer satisfaction is a key metric in our restaurant-level incentive bonus plans.
We operate in accordance with quality assurance and health standards mandated by federal, state and local governmental laws and regulations. These standards include food preparation rules regarding, among other things, minimum cooking times and temperatures, maximum time standards for holding prepared food, food handling guidelines and cleanliness. To maintain these standards, under BKC's oversight third-party firms conduct unscheduled inspections and follow-up inspections of our restaurants and report their findings to us. In addition, restaurant managers conduct internal inspections for taste, quality, cleanliness and food safety on a regular basis.
Trademarks
As a franchisee of Burger King and Popeyes, we also have contractual rights to use certain BKC-owned trademarks, service marks and other intellectual property relating to the Burger King concept.and Popeyes concepts. We have no proprietary intellectual property other than the Carrols logo and trademark.
Government Regulation
Various federal, state and local laws affect our business, including various health, sanitation, fire and safety standards. Restaurants to be constructed or remodeled are subject to state and local building code and zoning requirements. In connection with the development and remodeling of our restaurants, we may incur costs to meet certain federal, state and local regulations, including regulations promulgated under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
We are subject to the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and various other federal and state laws governing such matters as the handling, preparation and sale of food and beverages; the provision of nutritional information on menu boards; minimum wage requirements; unemployment compensation; overtime; and other working conditions and citizenship requirements.
A significant number of our food service personnel are paid at rates related to the federal, and where applicable, state minimum wage and, accordingly,wage. Accordingly, increases in the minimum wage have increased and in the future will increase wage rates at our restaurants.


The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the “Act”) required businesses employing fifty or more full-time equivalent employees to offer health care benefits to those full-time employees or be subject to an annual penalty. Those benefits must be provided under a health care plan which provides a certain minimum scope of health care services. The Act also limits the portion of the cost of the benefits which we can require employees to pay. Based on our enrollment history to date, approximately 13%14% of our approximately 1,9003,500 eligible hourly employees have opted for coverage under our medical plan.
We are also subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws, rules and regulations. We believe that we conduct our operations in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws, rules and regulations.
16


Our costs for compliance with environmental laws, orrules and regulations havehas not had a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition in the past.
past.
Industry and Competition
The Restaurant Market. Restaurant sales historically have closely tracked several macroeconomic indicators and we believe that “away-from-home” food consumption will increase due to these trends in recent years. Historically, unemployment has been inversely related to restaurant sales and, as the unemployment rate decreases and disposable income increases, restaurant sales have increased. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, in 2017through November 2020 food away from home dollars exceeded at-home dining, with 50.3%were 44.8% of nominal food dollars, spent on food away from home and with total expenditures increasing 2.6%decreasing 18.3% from 2016.the same period in 2019. This reflects changes in the overall restaurant industry as a result of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, but not the quick-service segment. Our sales stabilized in May 2020 as guests have relied on our take-out and delivery service modes.
Quick-Service Restaurants. We operate in the hamburger categoryand chicken categories of the quick-service restaurant segmentsegments of the restaurant industry. Quick-service restaurants are distinguished by high speed of service and efficiency, convenience, limited menu and service, and value pricing. According to Nation's Restaurant News, 20162019 U.S. foodservice sales for the Top 100200 restaurant chains increased 3.6%3.8% from 20152018 to $257.0$313.5 billion. Of this amount, the hamburger category represented $78.5$88.8 billion, or 30.5%28.3%, making it the largest category of the quick-service segment.
The restaurant industry is highly competitive with respect to price, service, location and food quality. In each of our markets, our restaurants compete with a large number of national and regional restaurant chains, as well as locally owned restaurants, offering low and medium-priced fare. We also compete with operators outside the restaurant industry such as convenience stores, delicatessens and prepared food counters in supermarkets, grocery stores, cafeterias and other purveyors offeroffering moderately priced and quickly prepared foods. Our competitors may also employ marketing strategies such as frequent use of price discounting, frequent promotions and an emphasis on value menus.
We believe that:
that product quality and taste;
taste, brand recognition;
recognition, convenience of location;
location, speed of service;
service, menu variety;
price;variety, price, and
ambiance
are the most important competitive factors in the quick-service restaurant segment and that our restaurants effectively compete in each category. We believe our largest competitors for our Burger King restaurants are McDonald's and Wendy's.Wendy's and the largest competitors for our Popeyes restaurants are KFC and Chik-fil-A.
EmployeesHuman Capital Management
As of December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, we employed approximately 23,50026,500 persons, of which approximately 160200 were administrative personnel and approximately 23,34026,300 were restaurant operations personnel. Approximately 75% of our employees are part-time and 80% have been employed by the Company for less than one year. None of our employees are unionized or covered by collective bargaining agreements. We believe that our overall relations with our employees are good.good and that our efforts to manage our workforce have been effective.
Diversity
We are committed to fostering a culture that encourages diversity and inclusion, and having diverse representation in our workforce. As of January 3, 2021, 56% of our employee base was female and approximately 56% of our employee base was comprised of racial and ethnic minorities.
Training
We maintain a comprehensive training and development program for all of our personnel and provide both classroom and in-restaurant training for our salaried and hourly restaurant personnel. Our program emphasizes, among other things, system-wide operating procedures, food preparation methods, food safety and customer service
17


standards. BKC's and PLK's training and development programs are also available to us as a franchisee through web access in all of our restaurants.
COVID-19 Response
Throughout the course of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, we have been adapting our business in order to continue operating safely, including, among other things, by doing the following:
To support the health and safety of our employees, beginning in March 2020 we have mandated, among other things, the use of masks, sanitizers and contactless procedures in our restaurants, and have required team members' temperatures be taken at the beginning of each shift.
We have increased the use of low contact procedures for food delivery, including installation of plexiglass barriers at the front counter and drive thru and the implementation of delivery services.
We have suspended all non-essential travel for our employees and implemented a work-from-home policy for all non-restaurant personnel.
We have established a "Carrols Cares" fund to provide immediate relief to employees in need.
Availability of Information


We file annual, quarterly and current reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.
We make available at no cost through our internet website (www.carrols.com)at www.carrols.com, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, as well as other reports relating to us that are filed or furnished to the SEC, as soon as reasonably practicabflepracticable after electronically filing or furnishing such material with the SEC. The referencereferences to our website address is a textual reference only, meaning that it doesand the SEC website address do not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the websitethese websites and should not be considered part of this document.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks described below, as well as other information and data included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.10-K. Any of the following risks could materially adversely affect our business, consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Business
We could be materially adversely affected by health concerns such as the current COVID-19 pandemic.
The United States and most other countries have experienced the widespread outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and in the past the Avian Flu or “SARS,” or H1N1. As we have experienced and are experiencing in the current COVID-19 environment:
If a virus is transmitted by human contact, our employees or customers may become infected, or may choose, or be advised, to avoid gathering in public places, any of which may adversely affect our restaurant customer traffic and our ability to adequately staff our restaurants, receive deliveries on a timely basis or perform functions at the corporate level. These are all areas that have been impacted during the second quarter of 2020 and continue to be challenges in the near-term for our business. The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted our customer traffic, and we have had to take immediate actions to shift focus to our drive-thru, carry-out and delivery service modes. We have also experienced significant staffing challenges, both as a result of employee exposure to COVID-19 as well as the hourly workforce being disincentivized by federal, state and local unemployment benefits and fearful of the workplace.
We also may be adversely affected if jurisdictions in which we have restaurants impose or continue to impose mandatory closures, seek or continue to seek voluntary closures or impose or continue to impose restrictions on operations. Even if such measures are not implemented and a virus or other disease does not
18


spread significantly, the perceived risk of infection or significant health risk may adversely affect our business. During the second quarter of 2020, we did see frequent changes to our restaurants' operating hours, as a result of shifting consumer behavior as well as public safety measures mandated by local jurisdictions. In March 2020, we closed the dining rooms in all our restaurants and modified operating hours in line with local ordinances and day-part sales trends. These closures were in effect for most of the second quarter of 2020, with each restaurant operating according to their respective local governmental guidelines as well as safety procedures developed by BKC and PLK. As individual states and local governments have allowed reopenings, we have continually evaluated the opportunity to re-open dining rooms. In most cases, consumers have not been eager to return to dining rooms, and restaurant sales in the third quarter of 2020 included approximately 1% of eat-in traffic.
Lower customer traffic as experienced in the immediate onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in our markets may not provide enough revenue to cover the fixed operating costs of our restaurants. We temporarily closed 46 restaurants in late March 2020 and early April 2020 that were geographically close to one of our other restaurants, and these closures were in effect for most of the second quarter of 2020. Due to restaurant sales improvements after the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic, we had reopened all of the temporarily closed restaurants by the end of 2020 except for two restaurants which were permanently closed in the third quarter. While most of these closures were temporary, our business remains sensitive to operating in environments with prolonged sales declines of the magnitude we saw in the first weeks of the pandemic.
We will incur incremental costs for an indefinite period of time to provide safety to our guests and our employees in the form of masks, sanitizers and thermometers as well as additional labor to continuously sanitize our restaurants. Throughout the course of this evolving COVID-19 outbreak, we have been adapting our business in order to continue operating safely. To support the health and safety of our employees and customers, among other things, we mandated the use of masks, sanitizers and contactless procedures in our restaurants, and have required temperature checks at the beginning of each shift for our team members. During the year ended January 3, 2021, we incurred $2.7 million in expenses directly related to COVID-19 related supplies, including face masks, thermometers, sneeze guards and sanitizers.
The uncertain economic environment that we are operating in now has required us to enhance our liquidity and bolster our balance sheet. In the first quarter of 2020 we borrowed on our Revolving Credit Facility to protect against a prolonged pandemic coupled with financial market illiquidity. We also increased our revolving credit borrowing capacity under our Revolving Credit Facility by $30.8 million to a total of $145.8 million, and incurred Incremental Term B-1 Loans of $75 million.
Our financial performance depends on our continuing ability to offer fresh, quality food at competitive prices. A significant disruption in service or supply by our suppliers or distributors could create disruptions in the operations of our restaurants and adversely affect our business. During the second quarter of 2020, we were subject to a limited menu in some markets due to limited product available from one of our suppliers and in some instances, deliveries were delayed due to the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic. A more significant disruption in service or supply by our suppliers or distributors due to the impact of COVID-19 on their businesses, whether from employees at these facilities contracting the COVID-19 virus, their own business suffering due to their inability to operate in the COVID-19 economic environment, or their own financial instability could have a material adverse effect on our business.
A health pandemic such as COVID-19 is a disease outbreak that has spread rapidly and widely by infection and has affected many individuals in areas of population density. Our restaurants are places where people can gather together for human connection. Customers might avoid or be advised to not gather in public places in the event of a health pandemic, and local, regional or national governments might continue or further limit or ban public gatherings to halt or delay the spread of disease. The impact of a health pandemic on us might be disproportionately greater than on other quick-service concepts that have lower customer traffic and that depend less on the gathering of people.
In addition, we cannot guarantee that changes to our operational policies and training will be effective to keep our employees and customers safe from the COVID-19 virus. Any publicity relating to health concerns or perceived or specific outbreaks of COVID-19 attributed to one or more of our restaurants, could result in a significant
19


decrease in guest traffic in all of our restaurants and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Furthermore, similar publicity or occurrences with respect to other restaurants or restaurant chains could also decrease our guest traffic and have a similar material adverse effect on our business.
Intense competition in the restaurant industry could make it more difficult to profitably expand our business and could also have a negative impact on our operating results if customers favor our competitors or we are forced to change our pricing and other marketing strategies.
The restaurant industry is highly competitive. In each of our markets, our restaurants compete with a large number of national and regional restaurant chains, as well as locally owned restaurants, offering low and medium-priced fare. We also compete with other convenience stores, delicatessens and prepared food counters in grocery stores, supermarkets, cafeterias and other purveyors of moderately priced and quickly prepared food. We believe our largest competitors for our Burger King restaurants are McDonald'sMcDonald’s and Wendy's restaurants.Wendy’s restaurants and the largest competitors for our Popeyes restaurants are KFC and Chick-fil-A.
Due to competitive conditions, we, as well as certain of the other major quick-service restaurant chains, have offered select food items and combination meals at discounted prices. These pricing and marketing strategies have had, and in the future may have, a negative impact on our sales and earnings.
Factors applicable to the quick-service restaurant segment may adversely affecthave a material adverse effect on our results of operations, which may cause a decrease in earnings and revenues.
The quick-service restaurant segment is highly competitive and can be materially adversely affected by many factors, including:
health concerns such as the ongoing coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19);
changes in local, regional or national economic conditions;
changes in demographic trends;
changes in consumer tastes;
changes in traffic patterns;
increases in fuel prices and utility costs;
consumer concerns about health, diet and nutrition;
increases in the number of, and particular locations of, competing restaurants;
changes in discretionary consumer spending;
inflation;
increases in the cost of food, such as beef, chicken, produce and packaging;
increased labor costs, including healthcare, unemployment insurance and minimum wage requirements;
the availability of experienced management and hourly-paid employees; and
regional weather conditions.



We are highly dependent on the Burger King systemand Popeyes systems and our ability to renew our franchise agreements with BKC.BKC and PLK. The failure to renew our franchise agreements or Burger King's or Popeyes' failure to compete effectively would materially adversely affect our results of operations.
Due to the nature of franchising and our agreements with BKC and PLK, our success is, to a large extent, directly related to the success of the Burger King and Popeyes system including itstheir financial condition, advertising programs, new products,product development, overall quality of operations and the successful and consistent operation of Burger King and Popeyes restaurants owned by other franchisees. We cannot assure you that Burger King or Popeyes restaurants will be able to compete effectively with other restaurants. As a result, any failure of the Burger King or Popeyes franchise systems to compete effectively would likely have a material adverse effect on our operating results.results of operations and financial condition.
Under each of our franchise agreements, with BKC, we are required to comply with operational programs established by BKC.BKC or PLK. For example, our franchise agreements with BKC and PLK require that our restaurants comply with specified design criteria. In addition, BKC generally has the right to require us during the tenth year of a franchise agreement to remodel our restaurants to conform to the then-current image of Burger King restaurants, and PLK
20


generally has the right to require us to remodel our restaurants to conform to the then-current image of Popeyes restaurants every six years, all of which may require the expenditure of considerable funds. In addition weWe also may not be able to avoid adopting menu price discount promotions or permanent menu price decreases instituted by BKC or PLK that may be unprofitable.
Our BKC franchise agreements typically have a 20-year20 year term after which BKC'sBKC’s consent is required to receive a successor franchise agreement. Our PLK franchise agreements with BKCtypically also have a 20-year term after which we have the options to (a) renew for a 10 year renewal term and (b) renew for a second supplemental renewal term of 10 years provided that arewe meet certain conditions as set to expire overforth in the next three years are as follows: 43 in 2018, 29 in 2019 and 51 in 2020.PLK franchise agreements.
We cannot assure you that BKC will grant each of our future requests for successor franchise agreements andor that we will be able to exercise any of the options to renew the PLK franchise agreements. Any failure of BKC to renew our franchise agreements couldwould materially adversely affect our operating results.results of operations and financial condition. In addition, as a condition of approval of a successor franchise agreement, BKC may require us to make capital improvements to particular restaurants to bring them up to Burger King current image standards established by Burger King, which may require us to incur substantial costs. Similarly, one of the conditions to our ability to exercise the option to renew our PLK franchise agreements is that we must make capital improvements to particular restaurants to bring them up to current image standards established by Popeyes, which may require us to incur substantial costs.
In addition, our franchise agreements with BKC and PLK do not give us exclusive rights to operate Burger King or Popeyes restaurants in any defined territory. Although we believe that BKC generally seeks to ensure that newly granted franchises do not materially adversely affect the operations of existing restaurants, weWe cannot assure you that franchises granted by BKC or PLK to third parties will not adversely affect any restaurants that we operate.
Additionally, as a franchisee, we have no control over the Burger King brand or the Popeyes brand. If BKC doesand PLK do not adequately protect the Burger King brandand Popeyes brands and other intellectual property, our competitive position and operating results of operations could be harmed.


Our strategy includes pursuing acquisitions of additional Burger King restaurants and we may not find Burger King restaurants that are suitable acquisition candidates or successfully operate or integrate any Burger King restaurants we may acquire.
As part of our strategy, we intend to pursue the acquisition of additional Burger King restaurants. Pursuant to the operating agreement between BKC and Carrols LLC, dated as of May 30, 2012, as amended on January 26, 2015 and December 17, 2015, BKC assigned to us its ROFR under its franchise agreements with its franchisees to purchase all of the assets of a restaurant or all or substantially all of the voting stock of the franchisee, whether direct or indirect, on the same terms proposed between such franchisee and a third party purchaser in 20 states as follows: Connecticut (except Hartford county), Delaware, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts (except for Middlesex, Norfolk and Suffolk counties), Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York (except for Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Queens, Richmond, Suffolk and Westchester counties), North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Vermont, Virginia, Washington DC, and West Virginia. In addition, pursuant to the operating agreement, BKC granted us, on a non-exclusive basis, franchise pre-approval to, among other things, acquire restaurants from Burger King franchisees in the 20 states above until we operate 1,000 Burger King restaurants. As part of the franchise pre-approval, BKC granted us pre-approval for acquisitions of restaurants from franchisees in the 20 states above subject to and in accordance with the terms of the operating agreement. Although we believe that opportunities for future acquisitions may be available from time to time, competition for acquisition candidates may exist or increase in the future. Consequently, there may be fewer acquisition opportunities available to us at an attractive acquisition price. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify, acquire, manage or successfully integrate additional restaurants without substantial costs, delays or operational or financial problems. In the event we are able to acquire additional restaurants, the integration and operation of the acquired restaurants may place significant demands on our management, which could adversely affect our ability to manage our existing restaurants. We may be required to obtain additional financing to fund future acquisitions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional financing, if necessary, on acceptable terms or at all. Both our senior credit facility and the indenture governing the $275.0 million of 8% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2022 (the "Notes") contain restrictive covenants that may prevent us from incurring additional debt to acquire additional Burger King restaurants.
We may experience difficulties in integrating restaurants acquired by us into our existing business.
The acquisition of a significant number of restaurants will involve the integration of those acquired restaurants with our existing business. The difficulties of integration include:
coordinating and consolidating geographically separated systems and facilities;
integrating the management and personnel of the acquired restaurants, maintaining employee morale and retaining key employees;
implementing our management information systems; and
implementing operational procedures and disciplines to control costs and increase profitability.
The process of integrating operations could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of our business and the loss of key personnel. The diversion of management's attention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with the acquisition of restaurants and integration of acquired restaurants' operations could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Achieving the anticipated benefits of the acquisition of additional restaurants will depend in part upon whether we can integrate any acquired restaurants in an efficient and effective manner. We may not accomplish this integration process smoothly or successfully. If management is unable to successfully integrate acquired restaurants, the anticipated benefits of the acquisition may not be realized.
In our evaluation of our recent and potential acquisitions, assumptions are made as to our ability to increase sales as well as improve restaurant-level profitability particularly in the areas of food, labor and cash controls as well as other operating expenses. If we are not able to make such improvements in these operational areas as planned, the acquired restaurants' targeted profitability levels will be affected which could cause an adverse effect on our overall financial results and financial condition.


We could be materially adversely affected by food-borne illnesses, as well as widespread negative publicity regarding food quality, illness, injury or other health concerns.
Negative publicity about food quality, illness, injury or other health concerns (including health implications of obesity) or similar issues stemming from one restaurant or a number of restaurants could materially adversely affect us, regardless of whether they pertain to our own restaurants, other Burger King or Popeyes restaurants, or to restaurants owned or operated by other companies. For example, health concerns about the consumption of beef, chicken or eggs or by specific events such as the outbreak of “mad cow” disease could lead to changes in consumer preferences, reduce consumption of our products and adversely affecthave a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial performance.condition. These events could also reduce available supply or significantly raise the price of beef, chicken or eggs.
In addition, we cannot guarantee that our operational controls and employee training will be effective in preventing food-borne illnesses, food tampering and other food safety issues that may affect our restaurants. Food-borne illness or food tampering incidents could be caused by customers, employees or food suppliers and transporters and, therefore, could be outside of our control. Any publicity relating to health concerns or the perceived or specific outbreaks of food-borne illnesses, food tampering or other food safety issues attributed to one or more of our restaurants, could result in a significant decrease in guest traffic in all of our restaurants and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition,Furthermore, similar publicity or occurrences with respect to other restaurants or restaurant chains could also decrease our guest traffic and have a similar material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our strategy includes pursuing acquisitions of additional Burger King and Popeyes restaurants and we may not find Burger King restaurants or Popeyes restaurants that are suitable acquisition candidates or successfully operate or integrate any Burger King restaurants or Popeyes restaurants that we may acquire.
As part of our strategy, we intend to selectively pursue the acquisition of additional Burger King and Popeyes restaurants. Pursuant to the ADA and retained in the Amended ADA, BKC has granted us franchise pre-approval to acquire Burger King restaurants from Burger King franchisees until we acquire more than 500 Burger King restaurants. The right of first refusal assigned to us from BKC pursuant to the ADA was forfeited by us as a result of entering into the Amended ADA in January 2021.
21


Competition for acquisition candidates may exist or increase in the future. Consequently, there may be fewer acquisition opportunities available to us at an attractive acquisition price. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify, acquire, manage or successfully integrate additional restaurants without substantial costs, delays or operational or financial problems. In the event we are able to acquire additional restaurants, the integration and operation of the acquired restaurants may place significant demands on our management, which could adversely affect our ability to manage our existing restaurants. We may be required to obtain additional financing to fund future acquisitions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional financing, if necessary, on acceptable terms or at all. Our Senior Credit Facilities contain restrictive covenants that may prevent us from incurring additional debt to acquire additional Burger King or Popeyes restaurants.
We may experience difficulties in integrating restaurants acquired by us into our existing business.
The acquisition of a significant number of restaurants involves the integration of those acquired restaurants with our existing business. The difficulties of integration include:
coordinating and consolidating geographically separated systems and facilities;
integrating the management and personnel of the acquired restaurants, maintaining employee morale and retaining key employees;
implementing our management information systems; and
implementing operational procedures and disciplines to control costs and increase profitability.
The process of integrating operations could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of our business and the loss of key personnel. The diversion of management’s attention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with the acquisition of restaurants and integration of acquired restaurants’ operations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Achieving the anticipated benefits of the acquisition of additional restaurants will depend in part upon whether we can integrate any acquired restaurants in an efficient and effective manner. We may not accomplish this integration process smoothly or successfully. If management is unable to successfully integrate acquired restaurants, the anticipated financial contribution of the acquisition may not be realized.
In our evaluation of our recent and potential acquisitions, assumptions are made as to our ability to increase sales as well as improve restaurant-level profitability particularly in the areas of food, labor and cash controls as well as other operating expenses. If we are not able to make such improvements in these operational areas as planned, the acquired restaurants’ targeted profitability levels will be affected which could cause an adverse effect on our overall financial results and financial condition.
22


We may incur significant liability or reputational harm if claims are brought against us or the Burger King brand.and Popeyes brands.
We may be subject to complaints, regulatory proceedings or litigation from guests or other persons alleging food-related illness, injuries suffered in our premises or other food quality, health or operational concerns, including environmental claims. In addition, in recent years a number of restaurant companies have been subject to lawsuits, including class action lawsuits, alleging, among other things, violations of federal and state law regarding workplace and employment matters, discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination and wage, rest break, meal break and overtime compensation issues and, in the case of quick servicequick-service restaurants, alleging that they have failed to disclose the health risks associated with high fat or high sodium foods and that their marketing practices have encouraged obesity. We may also be subject to litigation or other actions initiated by governmental authorities or our employees, among others, based upon these and other matters. Adverse publicity resulting from such allegations or occurrences or alleged discrimination or other operating issues stemming from one or a number of our locations could adversely affect our business,results of operations and financial condition, regardless of whether the allegations are true, or whether we are ultimately held liable. Any cases filed against us could materially adversely affect usour results of operations and financial condition if we lose such cases and have to pay substantial damages or if we settle such cases. In addition, any such cases may materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition by increasing our litigation costs and diverting our attention and resources to address such actions. In addition,Furthermore, if a claim is successful, our insurance coverage may not cover or be adequate to cover all liabilities or losses and we may not be able to continue to maintain such insurance, or to obtain comparable insurance at a reasonable cost, if at all. If we suffer losses, liabilities or loss of income in excess of our insurance coverage or if our insurance does not cover such loss, liability or loss of income, there could be a material adverse effect on our results of operations.  


operations and financial condition.
Changes in consumer taste could negatively impact our business.
We obtain a significant portion of our revenues from the sale of hamburgers, fried chicken and various types of sandwiches. If consumer preferences for these types of foods change, it could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.results of operations and financial condition. The quick-service restaurant segment is characterized by the frequent introduction of new products, often supported by substantial promotional campaigns, and is subject to changing consumer preferences, tastes, and eating and purchasing habits. Our success depends on BKC'sBKC’s and PLK's ability to anticipate and respond to changing consumer preferences, tastes and dining and purchasing habits, as well as other factors affecting the restaurant industry, including new market entrants and demographic changes. BKC or PLK may be forced to make changes to our menu items in order to respond to changes in consumer tastes or dining patterns, and we may lose customers who do not prefer the new menu items. In recent years, numerous companies in the quick-service restaurant segments have introduced products positioned to capitalize on the growing consumer preference for food products that are, or are perceived to be, promoting good health, nutritious, low in calories, and low in fat content.content or plant-based. If BKC or PLK does not continually develop and successfully introduce new menu offerings that appeal to changing consumer preferences or if the Burger King system doesand Popeyes franchise systems do not timely capitalize ondevelop new products, our operating results of operations and financial condition could suffer. In addition, any significant event that adversely affects consumption of our products, such as cost, changing tastes or health concerns, could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We could be adversely affected by our failure to acknowledge and sufficiently respond to the fast-moving influence of social media.
The widespread use of social media platforms can provide individuals with access to a broad audience at any time of day. The content shared by users on these platforms may be published without consideration of accuracy or its potential impact. Such content may be factually inaccurate, but nonetheless negatively impact our customer engagement, business operations, brand reputation or financial performance. This damage could be fast-moving and not allow us or our franchisors a chance to address the situation.
23


If a significant disruption in service or supply by any of our suppliers or distributors were to occur, it could create disruptions in the operations of our restaurants, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.results of operations and financial condition.
Our financial performance depends on our continuing ability to offer fresh, quality food at competitive prices. If a significant disruption in service or supply by our suppliers or distributors were to occur, it could create disruptions in the operations of our restaurants, which could have a material adverse effect on us.our results of operations and financial condition.
We are a member of a national purchasing cooperative, Restaurant Services, Inc., which serveswe refer to as the purchasing agent"RSI", created for approved distributors to the Burger King system. RSI is a non-profit independent purchasing cooperative that is responsible for sourcing our products and related supplies and managing relationships with approved distributors for the Burger King system. We use our purchasing power to negotiate directly with certain other vendors, to obtain favorable pricing and terms for supplying our restaurants. For our Burger King restaurants, we are required to purchase all of our food products,foodstuffs, paper goods and packaging materials from BKC-approved suppliers.suppliers at prices negotiated by RSI. We currently primarily utilize mostly threefour distributors, for our restaurants, Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc.,Lineage Foodservice Solutions, LLC, Reinhart Food Service L.L.C.,L.L.C, McLane Company Inc. and MBM Food Service Inc. ,Performance Foodservice, to supply our Burger King restaurants in various geographical areas.with the majority of our foodstuffs. As of December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, such distributors supplied 42%34%, 29%28%, 28% and 29% 10%, respectively, of our Burger King restaurants. Although
For our Popeyes restaurants we believeare a member of a national purchasing cooperative, Supply Management Services, Inc. ("SMS"). SMS is a non-profit independent purchasing cooperative that we have alternative sourcesis responsible for sourcing certain of supply, inour products and managing relationships with approved distributors for the Popeyes system. Popeyes utilizes five distributors, two for poultry products and three for all other products. For our Popeyes restaurants, one distributor, Tyson Foods, supplies 75% of our poultry products. Another distributor, Customized Distribution Services, Inc. supplies 60 of our Popeyes restaurants with all non-poultry products.
In the event that any of our distributors or suppliers are unable to service us thisand we are unable to timely secure alternative sources for product, we could lead tosuffer a disruption of service or supply until a new distributor or supplier is engaged, which could have ana material adverse effect on our business.results of operations and financial condition.
If labor costs increase, we may not be able to make a corresponding increase in our prices and our operating results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
Wage rates for a number of our employees are either at or slightly above the federal and or state minimum wage rates. As federal and/or state minimum wage rates increase, we may need to increase not only the wage rates of our minimum wage employees but also the wages paid to the employees at wage rates which are above the minimum wage, which will increase our costs. The extent to which we are not able to raise our prices to compensate for increases in wage rates, including increases in state unemployment insurance costs or other costs including mandated health insurance, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.results of operations and financial condition. In addition, even if minimum wage rates do not increase, we may still be required to raise wage rates in order to compete for an adequate supply of labor for our restaurants.

Higher labor costs due to statutory and regulatory changes could have a material adverse effect on our businessresults of operations and financial results.condition.
We are subject to the federal labor laws, including the Fair Labor Standards Act, as well as various state and local laws governing such matters as minimum wages, labor relations, workplace safety, citizenship requirements and other working conditions for employees. Federal, state and local laws may also require us to provide paid and unpaid leave, healthcare, sick time or other benefits to our employees. Changes in the law, or penalties associated with any failure on our part to comply with legal requirements, could increase our labor costs or result in additional expense.
StartingBeginning in 2018, certain workers will bewere able to take up to eight weeks (increasing in New York and other areas to twelve weeks in 2021) of employer-provided paid leave for childbirth, care for a seriously ill family member or needs related to a family member’s military deployment. TheseWe have considered these labor costs in our price changes, and additional expenseslabor costs may causerequire us to raise our prices.


prices in the future. In certain geographic areas which cannot absorb such increases, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition; results of operations and/or cash flows.and financial condition. We provide unpaid leave for employees for covered family and medical reasons, including
24


childbirth, to the extent required by the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1933,1993, as amended, and applicable state laws. To the extent we need to hire additional employees or pay overtime forto replace such employees on leave, this would be an added expense which could adverselyhave a material adverse affect on our results of operations.

operations and financial condition.
Increases in income tax rates or changes in income tax laws could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.operations and financial condition.
Increases in income tax rates in the United States or other changes in income tax laws in any particular jurisdiction could reduce our after-tax income from such jurisdiction and could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. The United States recently made changes to existing tax laws in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Act""Tax Act"), which was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The changes in the Act are broad and complex and we continue to examine the impact it may have on our business and financial results. Among its many provisions, the Tax Act reduced the U.S. Federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% and imposed limitations on the deductibility of interest and certain other corporate deductions. In accordance with applicable SEC guidance, we recorded a provisional net tax benefit in the fourth quarter of 2017 resulting from the enactment of the Act. This provisional expense is subject to change, possibly materially, due to, among other things, changes in estimates, interpretations and assumptions we have made, changes in Internal Revenue Service (IRS) interpretations, the issuance of new guidance, legislative actions, changes in accounting standards or related interpretations in response to the Act and future actions by states within the United States that have not currently adopted the Act. Additional changes in the U.S. tax regime, including changes in how existing tax laws are interpreted or enforced, could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
operations and financial condition.
The efficiency and quality of our competitors'competitors’ advertising and promotional programs and the extent and cost of our advertising could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
The success of our restaurants depends in part upon the effectiveness of the advertising campaigns and promotions by BKC.BKC or PLK. If our competitors increase spending on advertising and promotion, or the cost of television or radio advertising increases, or BKC'sBKC’s, PLK's or our advertising and promotions are less effective than our competitors'competitors’, there could be a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our business is regional and we therefore face risks related to reliance on certain markets as well as risks for other unforeseen events.
At December 31, 2017, 19%January 3, 2021, 15% of our restaurants were located in North Carolina, 16%12% were located in New York, 12% were located in Tennessee, and 32%24% were located in Indiana, Ohio and Michigan. Therefore, the economic conditions, state and local government regulations, weather conditions or other conditions affecting New York, Tennessee, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan and North Carolina, and other unforeseen events, including terrorism and other international conflictsregional issues, may have a material impact on the success of our restaurants in those locations.
Many of our restaurants are located in regions that may be susceptible to severe weather conditions such as harsh winter weather.weather and hurricanes. As a result, adverse weather conditions in any of these areas could damage these restaurants, result in fewer guest visits to these restaurants and otherwise have a material adverse impact on our business.results of operations and financial condition.
We could be materially adversely affected by external events such as extreme weather, natural disasters, terrorist actions, pandemics and civil unrest, among others.
External events such as extreme weather, natural disasters, terrorist actions, pandemics and civil unrest, and anticipation of such events, can adversely affect consumer spending, supply availability and costs, and our ability to operate our business in any impacted market.
We cannot assure you that the current locations of our restaurants will continue to be economically viable or that additional locations willcan be acquired at reasonable costs.
The location of our restaurants has significant influence on their success. We cannot assure you that current locations will continue to be economically viable or that additional locations can be acquired at reasonable costs. In addition, the economic environment where restaurants are located could decline in the future, which could result in reduced sales for those locations. We cannot assure you that new sites will be profitable or as profitable as existing sites.
Economic downturns may adversely impact consumer spending patterns.
The U.S. economy is experiencing and has in the past experienced significant slowdown and volatility due to uncertainties related to availability of credit, difficulties in the banking and financial services sectors, softness in the housing market,


diminished market liquidity, falling consumer confidence and high unemployment rates.rates including
25


as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our business is dependent to a significant extent on national, regional and local economic conditions, particularly those that affect our guests that frequently patronize our restaurants.restaurants and the health of surrounding businesses who employ a significant amount of workers. In particular, where our customers'customers’ disposable income is reduced (such as by job losses, credit constraints and higher housing, tax, energy, interest or other costs) or where theour customer's actual or perceived wealth of customers has decreased (because of circumstances such as lower residential real estate values, increased foreclosure rates, increased tax rates or other economic disruptions), our restaurants have in the past experienced, and may in the future experience, lower sales and customer traffic as customers choose lower-cost alternatives or other alternatives to dining out. The resulting decrease in our customer traffic or average sales per transaction has had an adverse effect in the past, and could in the future have a material adverse effect, on our business.results of operations and financial condition.
The loss of the services of our senior management could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.operations and financial condition.
Our success depends to a large extent upon the continued services of our senior management who have substantial experience in the restaurant industry. We believe that it could be difficult to replace our senior management with individuals having comparable experience. Consequently, the loss of the services of members of our senior management could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.operations and financial condition.
Government regulation could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.operations and financial condition.
We are subject to extensive laws and regulations relating to the development and operation of restaurants, including regulations relating to the following:
zoning;
requirements relating to labeling of caloric and other nutritional information on menu boards, advertising and food packaging;
the preparation and sale of food;
employer/employee relationships, including minimum wage requirements, overtime, mandatory paid and unpaid leave, working and safety conditions, and citizenship requirements;
health care; and
federal and state laws that prohibit discrimination and laws regulating the design and operation of, and access to, facilities, such as the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990.
In the event that legislation having a negative impact on our business is adopted, it could have a material adverse impact on us.our results of operations and financial condition. For example, substantial increases in the minimum wage or state or Federal unemployment taxes could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Local zoning or building codes or regulations can cause substantial delays in our ability to build and open new restaurants. Any failure to obtain and maintain required licenses, permits and approvals could also adversely affect our operating results.results of operations and financial condition.
Federal, state and local environmental regulations relating to the use, storage, discharge, emission and disposal of hazardous materials could expose us to liabilities which could adversely affecthave a material adverse effect on our results of operations.operations and financial condition.
We are subject to a variety of federal, state and local environmental regulations relating to the use, storage, discharge, emission and disposal of hazardous substances or other regulated materials, release of pollutants into the air, soil and water, and the remediation of contaminated sites.
Failure to comply with environmental laws could result in the imposition of fines or penalties, restrictions on operations by governmental agencies or courts of law, as well as investigatory or remedial liabilities and claims for alleged personal injury or damages to property or natural resources. Some environmental laws impose strict, and under some circumstances joint and several, liability for costs of investigation and remediation of contaminated sites on current and prior owners or operators of the sites, as well as those entities that send regulated materials to the sites. We cannot assure you that we have been or will be at all times in complete compliance with such laws, regulations and permits. Therefore, our costs of complying with current and future environmental, health and safety laws could adversely affecthave a material adverse effect our results of operations.operations and financial condition.
26


We are subject to all of the risks associated with leasing property subject to long-term, non-cancelable leases.


The leases for our restaurant locations (except for certain acquired restaurants which have an underlying lease term of less than 20 years) generally have initial terms of 20 years, and typically provide for renewal options in five year increments as well as for rent escalations. Generally, our leases are “net” leases, which require us to pay all of the costs of insurance, taxes, maintenance and utilities. Additional sites that we lease are likely to be subject to similar long-term, non-cancelable leases. We generally cannot cancel our leases. If an existing or future restaurant is not profitable, and we decide to close it, we may nonetheless be obligated to perform our monetary obligations under the applicable lease including, among other things, paying all amounts due for the balance of the lease term. In addition, as each of our leases expire, we may fail to negotiate renewals, either on commercially acceptable terms or any terms at all, which could cause us to close restaurants in desirable locations.
An increase in food costs could adversely affecthave a material adverse effect on our operating results.results of operations and financial condition.
Our profitability and operating margins are dependent in part on our ability to anticipate and react to changes in food costs. Changes in the price or availability of certain food products, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, could affect our ability to offer broad menu and price offerings to guests and could materially adversely affect our profitability and reputation. The type, variety, quality, source and price of beef, chicken, produce and cheese can be subject to change anddue to factors beyond our control, including weather, governmental regulation, availability and seasonality, each of which may affect our food costs or cause a disruption in our supply. Our food distributors or suppliers may also be affected by higher costs to produce and transport commodities used in our restaurants, higher minimum wage and benefit costs and other expenses that they pass through to their customers, which could result in higher costs for goods and services supplied to us. Although RSI is able to contract for certain food commodities for periods up to one year, the pricing and availability of some commodities used in our operations are not locked in for periods of longer than one week or at all. We do not currently use financial instruments to hedge our risk toof market fluctuations in the price of beef, produce and other food products. We may not be able to anticipate and react to changing food costs through menu price adjustments in the future, which could negatively impact our results of operations.operations and financial condition.
Security breaches of confidential guestcredit card, consumer, employee and other material information in connection withas well as other threats to our electronic processingtechnical systems may have a material adverse effect on our results of creditoperations and debit card transactions may adversely affect our business.financial condition.
A significant amountApproximately half of our restaurant sales are by credit or debit cards. Other restaurants and retailers have experienced security breaches in which creditconfidential or material information has been compromised. The Company devotes significant resources to data encryption, network security and debit card information of their customers was compromised.other measures to protect its systems and data, but these security measures cannot provide absolute security. We may in the future become subject to lawsuits, fines or other proceedings for purportedly fraudulent transactions arising out of the actual or alleged theft of our guests'guests’ credit or debit card or any other material information. Any such claim or proceeding, or any adverse publicity resulting from these allegations, may have a material adverse effect on usour results of operations and our restaurants.financial condition.
We depend onThe Company’s results of operations, financial condition and reputation may be impacted by information technology and any material failure of that technology could impair our ability to efficiently operate our business.system failures or network disruptions.
We rely on information systems across our operations including, for example, point-of-sale processing in our restaurants, collection of cash, procurement and payment to significant suppliers, collection of cash, and payment of otherpayroll, financial obligationsreporting and various other processes and procedures. Our ability to efficiently manage our business depends significantly on the reliability and capacity of these systems. The failureCompany may be subject to information technology system failures and network disruptions caused by natural disasters, accidents, pandemics, power disruptions, telecommunications failures, acts of these systemsterrorism or war, computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins, ransomware or other events or disruptions. System redundancy may be ineffective or inadequate, and the Company’s disaster recovery planning may not be sufficient for all eventualities which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. While the Company maintains dedicated insurance coverage that, subject to operate effectively, problems with maintenance, upgradingpolicy terms and conditions and subject to a deductible, is designed to address certain aspects of cyber risks, such insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover all losses or transitioning to replacement systems or a breachall types of claims that may arise in securitythe continually evolving area of these systems could cause delays in customer service and reduce efficiency in our operations. Significant capital investments might be required to remediate any problems.cyber risk.
27


Carrols is currently a guarantor under 2718 Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc. ("Fiesta") restaurant property leases and the primary lessee on five Fiesta restaurant property leases and any default under such property leases by Fiesta may result in substantial liabilities to us.
Fiesta, a former wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, was spun-off in 2012 to the Company's stockholders. Carrols currently is a guarantor under 2718 Fiesta restaurant property leases.leases, of which all except for two are still operating as of January 3, 2021. The Separation and Distribution Agreement which we refer to as the "separation agreement", dated as of April 24, 2012 and entered into in connection with the spin-off among Carrols, Fiesta and us provides that the parties will cooperate and use their commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the release of such guarantees. Unless and until any such guarantees are released, Fiesta agrees to indemnify Carrols for any losses or liabilities or expenses that it may incur arising from or in connection with any such lease guarantees.


Carrols is currently a primary lessee of five Fiesta restaurants which it subleases to Fiesta. The separation agreement provides that the parties will cooperate and use their commercially reasonable efforts to cause Fiesta or a subsidiary of Fiesta to enter into a new master lease or individual leases with the lessor with respect to the Fiesta restaurants where Carrols is currently a lessee. The separation agreement provides that until such new master lease or such individual leases are entered into, (i) Carrols will perform its obligations under the master lease for the five Fiesta restaurants where it is a lessee and (ii) the parties will cooperate and use their commercially reasonable efforts to enter into a non-disturbance agreement or similar agreement with the lessor which shall provide that Fiesta or one of its subsidiaries shall become the lessee under such master lease with respect to such Fiesta restaurants and perform Carrols' obligations under such master lease in the event of a breach or default by Carrols.
Such guarantees may never be released and a new master lease with respect to the five Fiesta properties where Carrols is the primary lessee may never be entered into by Fiesta. Any losses or liabilities that may arise in connection such guarantees or the master lease where Carrols is not able to receive indemnification from Fiesta may result in substantial liabilities to us and could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
The market price of our common stock may be highly volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance.
The trading price of our common stock may fluctuate substantially. The price of our common stock that will prevail in the market may be higher or lower than the price when you pay,acquired our stock, depending on many factors, some of which are beyond our control. Broad market and industry factors may adversely affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. The fluctuations could cause a loss of all or part of an investment in our common stock. Factors that could cause fluctuation in the trading price of our common stock may include, but are not limited to the following:
price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;
significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of companies generally or restaurant companies;companies specifically;
actual or anticipated variations in the earnings or operating results of our company or our competitors;
actual or anticipated changes in financial estimates by us or by any securities analysts who might cover our stock or the stock of other companies in our industry;
market conditions or trends in our industry and the economy as a whole;
announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships or divestitures and our ability to complete any such transaction;
announcements of investigations or regulatory scrutiny of our operations or lawsuits filed against us;
capital commitments;
changes in accounting principles;
additions or departures of key personnel;
sales of our common stock, including sales of large blocks of our common stock or sales by our directors and officers; and
events that affect BKC.BKC, PLK or any of our significant suppliers discussed above.
In addition, if the market for restaurant company stocks or the stock market in general experiences loss of investor confidence, the trading price of our common stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, results of operations or financial condition. The trading price of our common stock might also decline in reaction to events that affect other companies in our industry or related industries even if these events do not directly affect us.
In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company's securities, class action securities litigation has often been brought against that company. Due to the potential volatility of our stock price, we may therefore be the target of securities litigation in the future. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and


divert management's attention and resources from our business, and could also require us to make substantial payments to satisfy judgments or to settle litigation.
28


The concentrated ownership of our capital stock by insiders will likelymay limit our stockholders' ability to influence corporate matters.
OurAt January 3, 2021, our executive officers, directors, BKC and BKCBlue Holdco 1, LLC (collectively the "BKC Stockholders"), and Cambridge together beneficially ownowned approximately 25.1%45.1% of our outstanding common stock, as of March 5, 2018 (assuminggiving effect to the conversion of the Series AB Convertible Preferred Stock held by BKC). Dueissued to the issuance of Series A Preferred Stock to BKC in connection with our 2012 acquisition, BKC beneficially owns approximately 20.5% of our common stock as of March 5, 2018 (assuming conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock). Our executive officers and directors (excluding directors affiliated with BKC) together beneficially own approximately 5.8% of our common stock outstanding as of March 5, 2018 (excluding conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock).Stockholders. As a result, our executive officers, directors, affiliates of the BKC Stockholders and BKC,Cambridge, if they act as a group, will be able to significantly influence matters that require approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions such as mergers and acquisitions. The directors will haveBKC Stockholders and Cambridge each has two representatives on our Board of Directors, which has the authority to make decisions affecting our company and its capital structure, including the issuance of additional debt and the declaration of dividends. Each of the BKC Stockholders and Cambridge may also have interests that differ from yoursthose of other stockholders and may vote in a way with which youother stockholders disagree and which may be adverse to yourtheir interests. Corporate action might be taken even if other stockholders oppose them. This concentration of ownership might also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of usthe Company that other stockholders may view as beneficial, which could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as part of a sale of our company and might ultimately depress the market price of our common stock.
We currently do not expect to pay any cash dividends for the foreseeable future, and the indenture governing the Notes and the senior credit facilityour Senior Credit Facilities limit our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.
We currently do not anticipate that we willexpect to pay any cash dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future. The absence of a dividend on our common stock may increase the volatility of the market price of our common stock or make it more likely that the market price of our common stock will decrease in the event of adverse economic conditions or adverse developments affecting our company. Additionally, the indenture governing the Notes and our senior credit facilitySenior Credit Facilities limit, and the debt instruments that we may enter into in the future may limit, our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.
If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or if they downgrade our stock, the price of our stock could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will rely in part on the research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about us or our business. We cannot assure you that these analysts will publish research or reports about us or that any analysts that do so will not discontinue publishing research or reports about us in the future. If one or more analysts who cover us downgrade our stock, our stock price could decline rapidly. If analysts do not publish reports about us or if one or more analysts cease coverage of our stock, we could lose visibility in the market, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.
Provisions in our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, as amended, or Delaware law might discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company or changes in our management and, therefore, depress the trading price of our common stock.
Delaware corporate law and our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, as amended, contain provisions that could discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company or changes in our management that the stockholders of our company may deem advantageous. These provisions:
require that special meetings of our stockholders be called only by our boardBoard of directorsDirectors or certain of our officers, thus prohibiting our stockholders from calling special meetings;
deny holders of our common stock cumulative voting rights in the election of directors, meaning that stockholders owning a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock will be able to elect all of our directors;


authorize the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock that our board could issue to dilute the voting and economic rights of our common stock and to discourage a takeover attempt;
provide that approval of our boardBoard of directorsDirectors or a supermajority of stockholders is necessary to make, alter or repeal our amended and restated bylaws and that approval of a supermajority of stockholders is necessary to amend, alter or change certain provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation;
29


establish advance notice requirements for stockholder nominations for election to our board or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings;
divide our board into three classes of directors, with each class serving a staggered 3-year term, which generally increases the difficulty of replacing a majority of the directors;
provide that directors only may be removed for cause by a majority of the board or by a supermajority of our stockholders; and
require that any action required or permitted to be taken by our stockholders must be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting of stockholders and may not be effected by any consent in writing.
Risks Related to Our Indebtedness
Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affecthave a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
As of December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021 we had approximately $281.9$494.2 million of total indebtedness outstanding consisting of $275.0$419.4 million Term Loan B borrowings and $73.9 million Term Loan B-1 borrowings under our Senior Credit Facilities and $0.9 million of Notes, $1.2finance lease liabilities. As of January 3, 2021 we had $136.1 million of lease financing obligations and $5.7 million of capital leases and other debt. At December 31, 2017, we had $60.2 million ofrevolving borrowing availability under our senior credit facilitySenior Credit Facilities (after reserving $12.8$9.7 million for letters of credit issued under our senior credit facility,the Senior Credit Facilities, which included amounts for anticipated claims from our renewals of workers' compensation and other insurance policies), which would effectively rank senior to the Notes. On January 13, 2017, we entered into an amendment to our senior credit facility to increase revolving credit borrowings to $73 million (including $20.0 million available for letters of credit).
As a result of our substantial indebtedness, a significant portion of our operating cash flow will be required to make payments of interest and principal on our outstanding indebtedness, and we may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations, or have future borrowings available under our senior credit facility,Senior Credit Facilities, to enable us to repay our indebtedness, including the Notes,Term Loan B and B-1 borrowings, or to fund other liquidity needs.
Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences to our stockholders. For example, it could:
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to the NotesSenior Credit Facilities and our other debt;
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness and related interest, including indebtedness we may incur in the future, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;
restrict our ability to acquire additional restaurants;
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;
increase our cost of borrowing;
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that may have less debt; and
limit our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements or general corporate purposes.
We expect to use cash flow from operations, our cash balances and revolving credit borrowings under our senior credit facilitySenior Credit Facilities to meet our current and future financial obligations, including funding our operations, debt service, possible future acquisitions and capital expenditures (including restaurant remodeling and new restaurant development). Our ability to make these payments depends on our future performance, which will be affected by financial, business, economic and other factors, many of which we cannot control. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future, which could result in our being unable to repay indebtedness, or to fund other liquidity needs. If we do not have sufficient liquidity, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures and restaurant acquisitions, sell assets, obtain additional debt or equity capital or restructure or refinance all or a portion


of our debt, including our senior credit facility and the Notes,Senior Credit Facilities, on or before maturity. We cannot make any assurances that we will be able to accomplish any of these alternatives on terms acceptable to us, or at all. In addition, the terms of existing or future indebtedness, including the agreements for our senior credit facility,Senior Credit Facilities, may limit our ability to pursue any of these alternatives.
30


Despite current indebtedness levels and restrictive covenants, we may still be able to incur more debt or make certain restricted payments, which could further exacerbate the risks described above.
We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur additional debt in the future, including debt that may be secured on a first lien basis or pari passu with the Notes. Although our senior credit facility and the indenture governing the NotesSenior Credit Facilities contain restrictions on our ability to incur indebtedness, those restrictions are subject to a number of exceptions. In addition, if we are able to designate some of our restricted subsidiaries under the indenture governing the Notes as unrestricted subsidiaries, those unrestricted subsidiaries would be permitted to borrow beyond the limitations specified in the indenture governing the Notes and engage in other activities in which restricted subsidiaries may not engage. We could also consider investments in joint ventures or acquisitions, which may increase our indebtedness. Moreover, although our senior credit facility and the indenture governing the NotesSenior Credit Facilities contain restrictions on our ability to make restricted payments, including the declaration and payment of dividends, we are able to make such restricted payments under certain circumstances. Adding new debt to current debt levels or making restricted payments could intensify the related risks that we and our subsidiaries now face.
The agreements governing our debt agreementsOur Senior Credit Facilities restrict our ability to engage in some business and financial transactions and contain certain other restrictive terms.
Our debt agreements, such as the indenture governing the Notes and our senior credit facility,Senior Credit Facilities restrict our ability in certain circumstances to, among other things:
incur additional debt;
pay dividends and make other distributions on, redeem or repurchase, capital stock;
make investments or other restricted payments;
enter into transactions with affiliates;
engage in sale and leaseback transactions;
sell all, or substantially all, of our assets;
create liens on assets to secure debt; or
effect a consolidation or merger.
These covenants limit our operational flexibility and could prevent us from taking advantage of business opportunities as they arise, growing our business or competing effectively. In addition, our senior credit facility requiredSenior Credit Facilities may require us to maintain specified financial ratiosa First Lien Net Ratio (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) and satisfy other financial tests. At December 31, 2017, we were in compliance with such covenants under our senior credit facility. Our ability to meet thesethis financial ratiosratio and other tests can be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you that we will meet these tests. At January 3, 2021, we were in compliance with such covenants.
A breach of any of these covenants or other provisions in our debt agreements could result in an event of default, which if not cured or waived, could result in such debt becoming immediately due and payable. This, in turn, could cause our other debt to become due and payable as a result of cross-acceleration provisions contained in the agreements governing such other debt. In the event that some or all of our debt is accelerated and becomes immediately due and payable, we may not have the funds to repay, or the ability to refinance, such debt. In addition, in the event that the Notes become immediately due and payable, the holders of the Notes would not be entitled to receive any payment in respect of the Notes until all of our senior debt has been paid in full.
We may not have the funds necessary to satisfy all of our obligations under our senior credit facility, the NotesSenior Credit Facilities or other indebtedness in connection with certain change of control events.
Upon the occurrence of specific kinds of change of control events, the indenture governing the Notes requires us to make an offer to repurchase all outstanding Notes at 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest (and additional interest, if any) to the date of repurchase. However, it is possible that we will not have sufficient funds, or the ability to raise sufficient funds, at the time of the change of control to make the required


repurchase of the Notes. In addition, restrictions under our senior credit facility may not allow us to repurchase the Notes upon a change of control. If we could not refinance such debt or otherwise obtain a waiver from the holders of such debt, we would be prohibited from repurchasing the Notes, which would constitute an event of default under the indenture. Certain important corporate events, such as leveraged recapitalizations that would increase the level of our indebtedness, would not constitute a “Change of Control” under the indenture.
In addition, our senior credit facility providesOur Senior Credit Facilities provide that certain change of control events constitute an event of default under such senior credit facility.default. Such an event of default entitles the lenders thereunder to, among other things, cause all outstanding debt obligations under the senior credit facilitySenior Credit Facilities to become due and payable and to proceed against the collateral securing such senior credit facility.Senior Credit Facilities. Any event of default or acceleration of the senior credit facilitySenior Credit Facilities will likely also cause a default under the terms of our other indebtedness.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
31


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, we owned 8nine and leased 799 Burger King1,065 restaurant properties including two restaurants located in mall shopping centers and 2128 co-branded locations. In addition, we owned fourfive and leased seven19 non-operating properties as of December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, not including threetwo properties under construction that are expected to open as new restaurants in 2018.2021.
We typically enter into leases (including renewal options) ranging from 20 to 40 years. The average remaining term for all leases, including options, was approximately 23.425.8 years at December 31, 2017.January 3, 2021. Generally, we have been able to renew leases, upon or prior to their expiration, at the prevailing market rates, although there can be no assurance that this will continue to occur.
Most of our Burger KingKing® restaurant leases are coterminous with the related franchise agreements. We believe that we generally will be able to renew at commercially reasonable rates the leases whose terms expire prior to the expiration of that location's Burger KingKing® franchise agreement, although there can be no assurance that this will occur.
Most leases require us to pay utility and water charges and real estate taxes. Certain leases also require contingent rentals based upon a percentage of gross sales of the particular restaurant that exceed specified minimums. In some of our mallshopping center locations, we are also required to pay certain other charges such as a pro rata share of the mall'sshopping center's common area maintenance costs, insurance and security costs.
In addition to the restaurant locations set forth under Item 1. “Business-Restaurant Locations”, we own a building with approximately 25,300 square feet at 968 James Street, Syracuse, New York, which houses our executive offices, most of our administrative operations for our Burger KingKing® restaurants and one of our regional support offices. We also lease seveneight small regional offices that support the management of our Burger KingKing® restaurants, two offices in Tennessee acquired in the Cambridge Acquisition, and two smallsmaller administrative offices in Syracuse, NY that support administrative operations.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Litigation. We are involved in various litigation matters and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. Based on our currently available information, we do not believe that the outcomeultimate resolution of any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.


ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None.
PART II
ITEM  5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is traded on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “TAST”. The high and low closing sale prices of our common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by The NASDAQ Global Market, are set forth below:  
 Common Stock Price
 
High 
 Low
Year Ended December 31, 2017   
First Quarter$16.85
 $13.80
Second Quarter14.25
 11.85
Third Quarter12.55
 10.55
Fourth Quarter13.30
 10.00
    
Year Ended January 1, 2017   
First Quarter$14.55
 $11.15
Second Quarter14.62
 11.72
Third Quarter13.88
 11.77
Fourth Quarter15.25
 11.25
On March 5, 2018,3, 2021, there were 36,538,90353,337,104 shares of our common stock outstanding held by 519482 holders of record. The number of record holders was determined from the records of our transfer agent and does not include beneficial owners of our common stock whose shares are held in the names of various securities brokers, dealers and registered clearing agencies. The closing price of our common stock on March 5, 2018 was $12.90.
We did not pay any cash dividends during the fiscal years 20172020 or 2016.2019. We currently intend to continue to retain all available funds to fund the development and growth of our business and do not anticipate payingexpect to pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, weWe are a holding company and conduct all of our operations through our direct and indirect subsidiaries. As a result, for us to pay dividends, we need to rely on dividends or distributions to us from Carrolsour direct and indirectly from subsidiaries of Carrols. The indenture governing the Notes and our senior credit facilityindirect subsidiaries. Our Senior Credit Facilities limit, and debt instruments that we and our subsidiaries may enter into in the future may limit, our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.

32



Stock Performance Graph
The following graph compares from December 31, 20122015 the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock overrelative to the cumulative total returns of The NASDAQ Composite Index and a peer group, Thethe S&P SmallCap 600 Restaurants Index. We have elected to use the S&P SmallCap 600 Restaurant Index in compiling our stock performance graph because we believe the S&P SmallCap 600 Restaurant Index represents a comparison to competitors with similar market capitalization as us. The following graph is based on the closing priceassumes an investment of $100 in our common stock fromand each index on December 31, 2012 through December 31, 2017.2015.


tast-20210103_g1.jpg
* $100 invested on 12/31/20122015 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.     
 12/31/201512/31/201612/31/201712/31/201812/31/201912/31/2020
Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc.$100.00 $129.90 $103.49 $83.82 $60.05 $53.49 
NASDAQ Composite$100.00 $108.87 $141.13 $137.12 $187.44 $271.64 
S&P SmallCap 600 Restaurants$100.00 $108.78 $100.34 $98.61 $103.52 $106.19 
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer
On August 2, 2019, our Board of Directors approved a repurchase program under which we may repurchase up to $25 million of our outstanding common stock (the "Repurchase Program"). The authorization became effective on August 2, 2019, and will expire 24 months thereafter, unless terminated earlier by our Board of Directors. Purchases under the Repurchase Program may be made from time to time in open market transactions at prevailing market prices or in privately negotiated transactions (including, without limitation, the use of Rule 10b5-1 plans) in compliance with applicable federal securities laws, including Rule 10b-18 under the Exchange Act. We have no obligation to repurchase stock under the Repurchase Program, and the timing, actual number and value of shares purchased will depend on our stock price, trading volume, general market and economic conditions, and other factors.
33


 12/31/201212/31/201312/31/201412/31/201512/31/201612/31/2017
Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc.$100.00
$110.54
$127.59
$196.32
$255.02
$203.18
NASDAQ Composite$100.00
$141.63
$162.09
$173.33
$187.19
$242.29
S&P SmallCap 600 Restaurants$100.00
$162.20
$188.79
$176.07
$185.75
$178.90



The table below reflects shares of common stock we repurchased in the fourth quarter of 2020:
Total Number of Shares PurchasedAverage Price Paid Per ShareTotal Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet to Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
SeptemberPurchased 9/28 through 9/30— $— — $— 
OctoberPurchased 10/1 through 10/31— $— — $— 
NovemberPurchased 11/1 through 11/30762,512 $6.11 762,512 $16,326,820 
DecemberPurchased 12/1 through 12/31771,792 $6.92 771,792 $10,983,543 
JanuaryPurchased 1/1 through 1/3— $— — $— 

(1) Shares were repurchased in open market transactions pursuant to the Repurchase Program.

34


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Our fiscal years ended January 1, 2017, December 31, 2017, December 30, 2018 and December 29, 2019 presented below each include 52 weeks. The fiscal year ended January 3, 2021 presented below includes 53 weeks.
The information in the following tabletables should be read together with "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,"our audited consolidated financial statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. In 2014, we acquired 123 restaurants from other franchisees in five separate transactions and in 2015, we acquired 55 restaurants from other franchisees in eight separate transactions. During 2016, we acquired 56 restaurants from other franchisees in seven separate transactions and in 2017 we acquired 64 restaurants from other franchisees in three separate transactions.
These historical results are10-K. Our consolidated financial information may not necessarilybe indicative of the results to be expected in the future. Our fiscal years ended December 29, 2013, December 28, 2014, January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017 each contained 52 weeks. The fiscal year ended January 3, 2016 contained 53 weeks.our future performance.
Year Ended
Acquisition Activity:January 1, 2017December 31, 2017December 30, 2018December 29, 2019January 3, 2021
Restaurants acquired566444234— 
Transactions7343— 
 Year Ended
 January 1, 2017December 31, 2017December 30, 2018December 29, 2019January 3, 2021
 (In thousands, except share and per share data)
Statements of operations data:
Revenue:
Restaurant sales943,583 1,088,532 1,179,307 1,452,516 1,547,502 
Other revenue— — — 10,249 — 
Total revenue943,583 1,088,532 1,179,307 1,462,765 1,547,502 
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales250,112 304,593 326,308 431,969 452,738 
Restaurant wages and related expenses297,766 350,054 382,829 485,278 498,127 
Restaurant rent expense64,814 75,948 81,409 107,147 118,444 
Other restaurant operating expenses148,946 166,786 178,750 227,364 236,059 
Advertising expense41,299 44,677 48,340 58,689 60,735 
General and administrative (1)(2)54,956 60,348 66,587 84,734 84,051 
Depreciation and amortization47,295 54,159 58,468 74,674 81,727 
Impairment and other lease charges2,355 2,827 3,685 3,564 12,778 
Other expense (income) (3)338 (333)(424)(1,911)(1,271)
Total operating expenses907,881 1,059,059 1,145,952 1,471,508 1,543,388 
Income (loss) from operations35,702 29,473 33,355 (8,743)4,114 
Interest expense18,315 21,710 23,638 27,856 27,283 
Loss on extinguishment of debt— — — 7,443 — 
Gain on bargain purchase— — (230)— — 
Income (loss) before income taxes17,387 7,763 9,947 (44,042)(23,169)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(28,085)604 (157)(12,123)6,294 
Net income (loss)$45,472 $7,159 $10,104 $(31,919)$(29,463)
Per share data:
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:$1.01 $0.16 $0.22 $(0.74)$(0.58)
Weighted average shares used in computing net income (loss) per share:
Basic35,178,329 35,416,531 35,715,372 43,421,715 50,751,185 
Diluted44,851,345 44,976,514 45,319,971 43,421,715 50,751,185 
35


 Year Ended
 December 29, 2013 December 28, 2014 January 3, 2016 January 1, 2017 December 31, 2017
 (In thousands of dollars, except share and per share data)
Statements of operations data:         
Restaurant sales$663,483
 $692,755
 $859,004
 $943,583
 $1,088,532
Costs and expenses:        
Cost of sales201,532
 209,664
 240,322
 250,112
 304,593
Restaurant wages and related expenses208,404
 219,718
 267,950
 297,766
 350,054
Restaurant rent expense47,198
 48,865
 58,096
 64,814
 75,948
Other restaurant operating expenses106,508
 113,586
 135,874
 148,946
 166,786
Advertising expense29,615
 27,961
 32,242
 41,299
 44,677
General and administrative (1)(2)37,228
 40,001
 50,515
 54,956
 60,348
Depreciation and amortization33,594
 36,923
 39,845
 47,295
 54,159
Impairment and other lease charges4,462
 3,541
 3,078
 2,355
 2,827
Other expense (income) (3)17
 47
 (126) 338
 (333)
Total operating expenses668,558
 700,306
 827,796
 907,881
 1,059,059
Income (loss) from operations(5,075) (7,551) 31,208
 35,702
 29,473
Interest expense18,841
 18,801
 18,569
 18,315
 21,710
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 12,635
 
 
Income (loss) before income taxes(23,916) (26,352) 4
 17,387
 7,763
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(10,397) 11,765
 
 (28,085) 604
Net income (loss)$(13,519) $(38,117) $4
 $45,472
 $7,159
Per share data:         
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:$(0.59) $(1.23) $0.00
 $1.01
 $0.16
          
Weighted average shares used in computing net income (loss) per share:         
Basic22,958,963
 30,885,275
 34,958,847
 35,178,329
 35,416,531
Diluted22,958,963
 30,885,275
 44,623,251
 44,851,345
 44,976,514
 Year Ended
 January 1, 2017December 31, 2017December 30, 2018December 29, 2019January 3, 2021
 (In thousands, except restaurant weekly sales data)
Other financial data:
Net cash provided by operating activities$62,288 $72,783 $80,769 $48,708 $103,945 
Total capital expenditures94,099 73,516 75,735 134,879 56,890 
Net cash used for investing activities96,221 108,105 106,894 218,045 47,857 
Net cash provided by financing activities13,661 62,372 727 168,297 5,902 
Operating Data:
Restaurants (at end of period)753 807 849 1,101 1,074 
Average number of restaurants719.5 784.3 813.9 998.5 1,078.0 
Average annual sales per restaurant (4)1,311 1,388 1,449 1,455 1,436 
Adjusted EBITDA (5)89,505 91,771 102,990 86,371 107,855 
Adjusted net income (loss) (5)17,860 9,262 14,091 (15,323)(3,733)
Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA (5)140,646 146,837 162,133 156,131 181,562 
Change in comparable restaurant sales (6)2.3 %5.2 %3.8 %2.2 %(2.7)%
Balance sheet data (at end of period):
Total assets$490,115 $581,514 $600,251 $1,751,460 $1,757,085 
Working capital(39,231)(19,514)(47,461)(109,540)(44,396)
Debt:
Senior and senior subordinated debt213,500 275,000 275,000 468,625 493,250 
Finance leases7,039 5,681 3,941 2,524 908 
Lease financing obligations3,020 1,203 1,201 1,198 1,189 
Total debt$223,559 $281,884 $280,142 $472,347 $495,347 
Stockholders’ equity$154,656 $169,060 $185,540 $309,462 $271,532 
Year Ended
January 1, 2017December 31, 2017December 30, 2018December 29, 2019January 3, 2021
 (In thousands, except per share data)
Reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA (5):
Net income (loss)$45,742 $7,159 $10,104 $(31,919)$(29,463)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(28,085)604 (157)(12,123)6,294 
Interest expense18,315 21,710 23,638 27,856 27,283 
Depreciation and amortization47,295 54,159 58,468 74,674 81,727 
EBITDA82,997 83,632 92,053 58,488 85,841 
Impairment and other lease charges2,355 2,827 3,685 3,564 12,778 
Acquisition and integration costs (7)1,853 1,793 1,445 10,827 273 
Abandoned development costs— — — 256 3,464 
Pre-opening costs— 363 462 1,449 163 
Other income, net (3)(1,603)(362)(424)(1,911)(1,271)
Litigation and other professional expenses (8)1,850 — 187 502 1,384 
Stock compensation expense2,053 3,518 5,812 5,753 5,223 
Gain on bargain purchase— — (230)— — 
Loss on extinguishment of debt— — — 7,443 — 
Adjusted EBITDA$89,505 $91,771 $102,990 $86,371 $107,855 



 Year Ended
 December 29, 2013 December 28, 2014 January 3, 2016 January 1, 2017 December 31, 2017
 (In thousands of dollars, except restaurant weekly sales data)
Other financial data:         
Net cash provided from operating activities$21,581
 $14,707
 $70,702
 $62,288
 $72,783
Total capital expenditures50,486
 52,010
 56,848
 94,099
 73,516
Net cash used for investing activities50,486
 68,003
 103,429
 96,221
 108,105
Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities(1,083) 66,215
 33,780
 13,661
 62,732
Operating Data:         
Restaurants (at end of period)564
 674
 705
 753
 807
Average number of restaurants563.8
 581.9
 662.1
 719.5
 784.3
Average annual sales per restaurant (4)1,176,806
 1,190,505
 1,274,372
 1,311,516
 1,387,850
Adjusted EBITDA (5)34,271
 36,008
 76,737
 89,505
 91,408
Adjusted net income (loss) (5)(10,668) (10,408) 13,429
 17,860
 9,037
Restaurant-Level EBITDA (5)70,226
 72,961
 124,520
 140,646
 146,474
Change in comparable restaurant sales (6)1.0% 0.6% 7.4% 2.3% 5.2%
Balance sheet data (at end of period):         
Total assets$329,481
 $364,573
 $427,256
 $490,155
 $581,514
Working capital(21,974) (13,554) (26,259) (39,231) (19,514)
Debt:         
Senior and senior subordinated debt150,000
 150,000
 200,000
 213,500
 275,000
Capital leases9,336
 8,694
 8,006
 7,039
 5,681
Lease financing obligations1,200
 1,202
 1,203
 3,020
 1,203
Total debt$160,536
 $159,896
 $209,209
 $223,559
 $281,884
Stockholders’ equity$77,204
 $106,535
 $107,999
 $154,656
 $169,060
36

 Year Ended
 December 29, 2013 December 28, 2014 January 3, 2016 January 1, 2017 December 31, 2017
 (In thousands of dollars, except per share data)
Reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA (5):        
Net income (loss) from continuing operations$(13,519) $(38,117) $4
 $45,472
 $7,159
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(10,397) 11,765
 
 (28,085) 604
Interest expense18,841
 18,801
 18,569
 18,315
 21,710
Depreciation and amortization33,594
 36,923
 39,845
 47,295
 54,159
EBITDA28,519
 29,372
 58,418
 82,997
 83,632
Impairment and other lease charges4,462
 3,541
 3,078
 2,355
 2,827
Acquisition costs (7)
 1,915
 1,168
 1,853
 1,793
Gain on partial condemnation and fires (8)
 
 
 (1,603) (362)
Litigation settlement (9)85
 
 
 1,850
 
Stock compensation expense1,205
 1,180
 1,438
 2,053
 3,518
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 12,635
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA$34,271
 $36,008
 $76,737
 $89,505
 $91,408
Reconciliation of Restaurant-Level EBITDA (5):        
Income (loss) from continuing operations$(5,075) $(7,551) $31,208
 $35,702
 $29,473
Add:         
Restaurant-level integration costs
 
 
 
 
General and administrative expenses37,228
 40,001
 50,515
 54,956
 60,348
Depreciation and amortization33,594
 36,923
 39,845
 47,295
 54,159
Impairment and other lease charges4,462
 3,541
 3,078
 2,355
 2,827
Other expense (income) (8) (9)17
 47
 (126) 338
 (333)
Restaurant-Level EBITDA$70,226
 $72,961
 $124,520
 $140,646
 $146,474


Year Ended
January 1, 2017December 31, 2017December 30, 2018December 29, 2019January 3, 2021
Reconciliation of Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA (5):
Income (loss) from operations$35,702 $29,473 $33,355 $(8,743)$4,114 
Add:
General and administrative expenses54,956 60,348 66,587 84,734 84,051 
Restaurant integration costs— — — 2,364 — 
Pre-opening costs— 363 462 1,449 163 
Depreciation and amortization47,295 54,159 58,468 74,674 81,727 
Impairment and other lease charges2,355 2,827 3,685 3,564 12,778 
Other expense (income), net (3)338 (333)(424)(1,911)(1,271)
Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA$140,646 $146,837 $162,133 $156,131 $181,562 

Year Ended
January 1, 2017December 31, 2017December 30, 2018December 29, 2019January 3, 2021
Reconciliation of Adjusted net income (loss) (5):Reconciliation of Adjusted net income (loss) (5):        Reconciliation of Adjusted net income (loss) (5):
Net income (loss)$(13,519) $(38,117) $4
 $45,472
 $7,159
Net income (loss)$45,472 $7,159 $10,104 $(31,919)$(29,463)
Add:         Add:
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 12,635
 
 
Loss on extinguishment of debt— — — 7,443 — 
Impairment and other lease charges4,462
 3,541
 3,078
 2,355
 2,827
Impairment and other lease charges2,355 2,827 3,685 3,564 12,778 
Acquisition costs (7)
 1,915
 1,168
 1,853
 1,793
Gain on partial condemnation and fires (8)
 
 
 (1,603) (362)
Litigation settlement (9)85
 
 
 1,850
 
Income tax effect of above adjustments (10)(1,696) (2,073) (6,415) (1,693) (1,618)
Adjust income tax benefit from deferred tax adjustments (11)
 24,326
 2,959
 (30,374) (762)
Acquisition and integration costs (7)Acquisition and integration costs (7)1,853 1,793 1,445 10,827 273 
Abandoned development costsAbandoned development costs— — — 256 3,464 
Pre-opening costsPre-opening costs— 363 462 1,449 163 
Other income, net (3)Other income, net (3)(1,603)(362)(424)(1,911)(1,271)
Gain on bargain purchaseGain on bargain purchase— — (230)— — 
Litigation and other professional expenses (8)Litigation and other professional expenses (8)1,850 — 187 502 1,384 
Income tax effect of above adjustments (9)Income tax effect of above adjustments (9)(1,693)(1,756)(1,138)(5,534)(4,199)
Adjustments to income tax benefit (10)Adjustments to income tax benefit (10)(30,374)(762)— — 13,138 
Adjusted net income (loss)$(10,668) $(10,408) $13,429
 $17,860
 $9,037
Adjusted net income (loss)$17,860 $9,262 $14,091 $(15,323)$(3,733)
Adjusted diluted net earnings (loss) per share (12)$(0.47) $(0.34) $0.30
 $0.40
 $0.20
Adjusted diluted net income (loss) per share (11)Adjusted diluted net income (loss) per share (11)$0.40 $0.21 $0.31 $(0.35)$(0.07)
(1) Acquisition expensescosts of $1,915, $1,168, $1,853$1.9 million, $1.8 million, $1.4 million, $8.5 million and $1,793$0.3 million were included in general and administrative expense for the years ended December 28, 2014, January 3, 2016, January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017, December 30, 2018, December 29, 2019 and January 3, 2021, respectively.
(2)General and administrative expenses include stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 29, 2013, December 28, 2014, January 3, 2016, January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017 of $1,205, $1,180, $1,438, $2,053 and $3,518, respectively.
(3)In fiscal 2017, we recorded a gain of $0.4 million related to an insurance recovery from a fire at one restaurant. In fiscal 2016, we recorded gains of $1.2 million  related to property insurance recoveries from fires at two restaurants, a gain of $0.5 million related to a settlement for a partial condemnation on one of our operating restaurant properties and expense of $1.85 million related to a litigation settlement.
(4)Average annual sales per restaurant are derived by dividing restaurant sales by the average number of restaurants operating during the period on a 52-week basis.
(5)EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted net income (loss) are non-GAAP financial measures. EBITDA represents net income or loss from operations, before provision or benefit for income taxes, interest expense and depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA adjusted to exclude impairment and other lease charges, acquisition costs, EEOC litigation and settlement costs, stock compensation expense, loss on extinguishment of debt and other non-recurring income or expense. Restaurant-Level EBITDA represents income or loss from operations adjusted to exclude general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, impairment and other lease charges, and other income or expense. Adjusted net income represents net income or loss adjusted to exclude loss on extinguishment of debt, impairment and other lease charges, acquisition costs, the related income tax effect of these adjustments and the establishment or reversal of a valuation allowance on our net deferred income tax assets.
(2)General and administrative expenses include stock-based compensation expense for the years ended January 1, 2017, December 31, 2017, December 30, 2018, December 29, 2019 and January 3, 2021 of $2.1 million, $3.5 million, $5.8 million, $5.8 million and $5.2 million, respectively.
(3)In 2020, we recorded gains related to insurance recoveries from property damage at four of the Company's restaurants of $2.1 million, a net gain on twelve sale-leaseback transactions of $0.2 million and a loss on disposal of assets of $1.0 million. In fiscal 2019, we recorded, among other things, a $1.9 million gain related to a settlement with BKC for the approval of new restaurant development by other franchisees which unfavorably impacted our restaurants. In fiscal 2018 and 2017, we recorded net gains of $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively, primarily related to insurance recoveries from fires at two restaurants. In fiscal 2016, we recorded gains of $1.2 million related to property insurance recoveries from fires at two restaurants, a gain of $0.5 million related to a settlement for a partial condemnation on one of its operating restaurant properties and expense of $1.85 million related to a settlement of litigation.
(4)Average annual sales per restaurant are derived by dividing restaurant sales by the average number of restaurants operating during the period.
(5)EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted net income (loss) are financial measures not in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). EBITDA represents net income or loss before income taxes, interest expense and depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA as adjusted to exclude impairment and other lease charges, acquisition and integration costs, stock compensation expense, pre-opening costs, gain on bargain purchase, loss on extinguishment of debt and other income or expense. Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA represents income or loss from operations adjusted to exclude general and administrative expenses, restaurant integration costs, pre-opening costs, depreciation and amortization, impairment and
37


other lease charges, and other income or expense. Adjusted net income (loss) represents net income or loss as adjusted to exclude loss on extinguishment of debt, impairment and other lease charges, acquisition and integration costs, pre-opening expense gain on bargain purchase, litigation costs, legal settlement gains and other income or expense, the related income tax effect of these adjustments and the establishment or reversal of a valuation allowance on our net deferred income tax assets.
We are presenting Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted net income (loss) because we believe that they provide a more meaningful comparison than EBITDA and net income or loss of our core business operating results, as well as with those of other similar companies. Additionally, we present Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA because it excludes the impact of general and administrative expenses and other income or expense, which are not directly related to restaurant-level operations. Management believes that Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA, when viewed with our results of operations in accordance with GAAP and the accompanying reconciliations, provide useful information about operating performance and period-over-period growth, and provide additional information that is useful for evaluating the operating performance of our core business without regard to potential distortions. Additionally, management believes that Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA permit investors to gain an understanding of the factors and trends affecting our ongoing cash earnings, from which capital investments are made and debt is serviced.
However, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted net income (loss) are not measures of financial performance or liquidity under GAAP and, accordingly, should not be considered as alternatives to net income or loss, income or loss from operations or cash flow from operating activities as indicators of operating performance or liquidity. Also, these measures may not be comparable to similarly titled captions of other companies.
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted net income (loss) have important limitations as analytical tools. These limitations include the following:
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA do not reflect our capital expenditures, future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments to purchase capital equipment;
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA do not reflect the interest expense or the cash requirements necessary to service principal or interest payments on our debt;


Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets that we currently depreciate and amortize will likely have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA do not reflect the cash required to fund such replacements; and
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted net income (loss) do not reflect the effect of earnings or charges resulting from matters that our management does not consider to be indicative of our ongoing operations. However, some of these charges (such as impairment and other lease charges and acquisition and integration costs) have recurred and may reoccur.
(6)Restaurants are included in comparable restaurant sales after they have been open or owned for 12 months. Comparable restaurant sales are on a 53-week basis for the year ended January 3, 2016.
(7)Acquisition costs for the periods presented include primarily legal and professional fees incurred in connection with acquisitions.
(8)Includes gains of $0.4 million related to a insurance recoveries from fires at two of our restaurants and a gain of $0.5 million related to a settlement for a partial condemnation on one of our operating restaurant properties.
(9)Includes an expense of $1.85 million from a litigation settlement.
(10)The income tax effect related to all adjustments, other than the deferred income tax valuation allowance provision (benefit), was calculated using an effective income tax rate of 38%.
(11)The provision (benefit) for income taxes in 2017 reflects a $0.8 million discrete tax benefit recorded in the fourth quarter to to remeasure our net deferred taxes due to the lowering of the Federal income tax rate to 21% under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act signed into law in the fourth quarter of 2017. The benefit for income taxes in 2016 reflects a $30.4 million income tax benefit recorded in the fourth quarter of 2016 to reverse the previously recorded valuation allowance on net deferred income tax assets as well as the full year deferred income tax provision of $2.3 million which was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2016. For comparability, when presenting 2016 Adjusted net income, the provision (benefit) for income taxes for each respective period is adjusted as if such valuation allowance had been reversed prior to 2016. The adjustment for the year ended December 28, 2014 reflects the removal of the income tax provision recorded for the establishment of the valuation allowance on all our net deferred income tax assets.
(12)Adjusted diluted net income (loss) per share is calculated based on Adjusted net income (loss) and the dilutive weighted average common shares outstanding for each respective period.
(6)Restaurants we acquire are included in comparable restaurant sales after they have been operated by us for 12 months. Sales from restaurants we develop are included in comparable sales after they have been open for 15 months. Comparable restaurant sales are on a 53-week basis for the year ended January 3, 2021.
38


(7)Acquisition and integration costs for the periods presented include certain legal and professional fees, corporate payroll, and other costs related to the integration of acquisitions and one-time repair and other operating costs which are included in Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA.
(8)Litigation and other professional expenses in fiscal 2020 include legal costs pertaining to an ongoing lawsuit with one of our vendors, costs to settle a class action claim and other non-recurring professional service expenses. In fiscal 2019 and 2018, this included legal costs pertaining to an ongoing lawsuit with one of our vendors and for fiscal 2016, represents costs for settlement of certain litigation.
(9)The income tax effect related to all adjustments, other than the deferred income tax valuation allowance provision (benefit), was calculated using an incremental income tax rate of 25% in fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2019, 22.2% in fiscal 2018 and 38% in all other years presented.
(10)Fiscal 2020 includes tax expense of $13.1 million to record an incremental tax valuation allowance for certain income tax credits as they may expire prior to their utilization. The benefit for income taxes in fiscal 2019 contains discrete tax adjustments of $0.5 million of income tax expense. The benefit for income taxes in fiscal 2018 contains net discrete tax adjustments of $0.1 million of income tax expense. The provision for income taxes in fiscal 2017 contains a $0.8 million discrete tax benefit recorded in the fourth quarter to remeasure our net deferred taxes due to the lowering of the Federal income tax rate to 21% under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act signed into law in the fourth quarter of 2017. The benefit for income taxes in fiscal 2016 reflects a $30.4 million income tax benefit recorded in the fourth quarter of 2016 to reverse a previously recorded valuation allowance on net deferred income tax assets.
(11)Adjusted diluted net income (loss) per share is calculated based on Adjusted net income (loss) and the dilutive weighted average common shares outstanding for each respective period.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our fiscal years consist of 52 or 53 weeks ending on the Sunday closest to December 31. The fiscal yearsyear ended December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017 each3, 2021 contained 5253 weeks and the fiscal year ended January 3, 2016December 29, 2019 contained 5352 weeks.
Introduction
We are a holding company and conduct all of our operations through our direct and indirect subsidiaries, Carrols, Carrols LLC, New CFH, LLC and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, and Republic Foods, Inc., and have no assets other than the shares of capital stock of Carrols and New CFH, LLC, our direct wholly-owned subsidiary.subsidiaries. The following “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (“MD&A”) is written to help the reader understand our company. The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying consolidated financial statement footnotes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.10-K. The overview provides our perspective on the individual sections of MD&A, which include the following:
Company Overview—a general description of our business and our key financial measures.
Recent and Future Events Affecting Our Results of Operations—a description of recent events that affect, and future events that may affect, our results of operations.
Results of Operations—an analysis of our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 20162021, and December 29, 2019, including a review of the material items and known trends and uncertainties. See Item 7 of our 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K for an analysis of our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018.
Liquidity and Capital Resources—an analysis of historical information regarding our sources of cash andflows, including capital expenditures, the existence and timing of commitments and contingencies, changes in capital resources and a discussion of cash flow items affectingknown trends that may impact liquidity.


Application of Critical Accounting Policies—an overview of accounting policies requiring critical judgments and estimates.
New accounting pronouncements—a discussion of new accounting pronouncements, dates of implementation, and the impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations, if any.
39


Company Overview
We areCarrols Restaurant Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, "Carrols Restaurant Group", the "Company", "we", "our" or "us") is one of the largest restaurant companies in the United States and havehas been operating restaurants for more than 5560 years. We are the largest Burger King® franchisee in the United States, based on number of restaurants, and have operated Burger KingKing® restaurants since 1976. As of December 31, 2017, our restaurant operations consistedJanuary 3, 2021 we operated, as a franchisee, a total of 807 franchised Burger King1,074 restaurants in 1723 states under the trade names of Burger King® and Popeyes®. This included 1,009 Burger King® restaurants in 23 Northeastern, Midwestern, Southcentral and Southeastern states and 65 Popeyes® restaurants in seven Southeastern states.
During the year ended December 31, 2017,29, 2019, we acquired 64179 Burger King® restaurants and 55 Popeyes restaurants in three separate transactions which we refer to as the "2017"2019 acquired restaurants". During the year ended January 1, 2017,December 30, 2018, we acquired 5644 Burger KingKing® restaurants in sevenfour separate transactions, which we refer to as the "2016 acquired restaurants," and during the year ended January 3, 2016, we acquired 55 Burger King restaurants in eight separate transactions, which we refer to as the "2015"2018 acquired restaurants".
For 2017, we have modified our grouping of restaurants for reportingAny reference to "BKC" refers to Burger King Corporation and analysis purposes. We referits indirect parent company, Restaurant Brands International Inc. ("RBI"). Any reference to our restaurants acquired over the past three years (2015, 2016"PLK" refers to Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc. and 2017) as our "acquired restaurants". All of our other restaurants, including restaurants acquired prior to 2015, are referred to as our "legacy restaurants".its indirect parent company, RBI.
The following is an overview of the key financial measures discussed in our results of operations:
Restaurant sales consist of food and beverage sales at our restaurants, net of sales discounts and excluding sales tax collected. Restaurant sales are influenced by changes in comparable restaurant sales, menu price increases, new restaurant development, acquisition of restaurants and the closures of restaurants. Comparable restaurant sales reflect the change in year-over-year sales for a comparable restaurant base. Restaurants including restaurants we acquire are included in comparable restaurant sales after they have been open or owned for 12 months and immediately after they re-open following a remodel. Newly developed restaurants are included in comparable restaurant sales after they have been open from being remodeled.for 15 months. For comparative purposes, where applicable, the calculation of the changes in comparable restaurant sales is based either on a 53-week or 52-week year.
Other revenue consists of fuel sales, food sales and sales of other convenience merchandise and services from the six convenience stores acquired as part of the Cambridge Acquisition (as defined in this MD&A). The six convenience stores were closed in the fourth quarter of 2019.
Cost of sales consists of food, paper and beverage costs including(including packaging costs,costs) and delivery charges, less purchase discounts.discounts and vendor rebates. Cost of sales is generally influenced by changes in commodity costs, the mix of items sold, and the level of promotional discounting, and the effectiveness of our restaurant-level controls to manage food and paper costs.
costs and the relative contribution of delivery sales. In 2019, cost of sales also included fuel costs for the six convenience stores acquired as part of the Cambridge Acquisition, which contributed lower margins relative to our restaurant cost of sales.
Restaurant wages and related expenses include all restaurant management and hourly productive labor costs and related benefits, employer payroll taxes and restaurant-level bonuses. Payroll and related benefits are subject to inflation, including minimum wage increases and increased costs for health insurance, workers’ compensation insurance and federal and state unemployment insurance.
Restaurant rent expense includes base rent and contingentvariable rent on our leases characterized as operating leases andleases. In 2018, restaurant rent expense also included the amortization of favorable and unfavorable leases and was reduced by the amortization of deferred gains on sale-leaseback transactions.
Other restaurant operating expensesinclude all other restaurant-level operating costs, the major components of which are royalty expenses paid to BKC and PLK, utilities, repairs and maintenance, real estate taxes and credit card fees.
Advertising expense includes advertising payments to BKC and PLK based on a percentage of sales as required under our franchise and operating agreements and additional marketing and promotional expenses in certain of our markets.
40


General and administrative expenses are comprised primarily of salaries and expenses associated with corporate and administrative functions that support the development and operations of our restaurants, legal, auditing and other professional fees, acquisition costs and stock-based compensation expense.
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted net incomeNet Income (Loss). EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted net incomeNet Income (Loss) are non-GAAP financial measures. EBITDA represents net income (loss) before provision or benefit for income taxes, interest expense and depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA adjusted to exclude impairment and other lease charges, acquisition and integration costs, loss on extinguishment of debt, stock compensation expense, and non-recurringother income or expense.expense, abandoned site development costs, pre-opening expenses and certain other non-recurring expenses. Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA represents income (loss) from operations adjusted to exclude general and


administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, impairment and other lease charges and other income or expense. Adjusted net income (loss) represents net income (loss) adjusted to exclude loss on extinguishment of debt, impairment and other lease charges, acquisition costs, non-recurringpre-opening and litigation costs, legal settlement gains and other income and expense and the related income tax effect of these adjustments and the establishment in 2015 and reversal in 2016 of a valuation allowance on all of our net deferred income tax assets. Adjusted net income also presents the provision or benefit for income taxes as if there was no valuation allowance on our net deferred income tax assets during all periods presented.adjustments.
We are presenting Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted net incomeNet Income (loss) because we believe that they provide a more meaningful comparison than EBITDA and net income of our core business operating results, as well as with those of other similar companies. Additionally, we present Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA because it excludes the impact of general and administrative expenses and other income or expense, which are not directly related to restaurant-level operations. Management believes that Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA, when viewed with our results of operations in accordance with GAAP and the accompanying reconciliations on page 42,54, provide useful information about operating performance and period-over-period growth, and provide additional information that is useful for evaluating the operating performance of our core business without regard to potential distortions. Additionally, management believes that Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA permit investors to gain an understanding of the factors and trends affecting our ongoing cash earnings, from which capital investments are made and debt is serviced.
However, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted net incomeNet Income (Loss) are not measures of financial performance or liquidity under GAAP and, accordingly, should not be considered as alternatives to net income, income from operations or cash flow from operating activities as indicators of operating performance or liquidity. Also, these measures may not be comparable to similarly titled captions of other companies. For the reconciliation between net income to EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income and the reconciliation of income from operations to Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA, see page 42.54.
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted net incomeNet Income (Loss) have important limitations as analytical tools. These limitations include the following:
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA do not reflect our capital expenditures, future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments to purchase capital equipment;
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA do not reflect the interest expense or the cash requirements necessary to service principal or interest payments on our debt;
Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets that we currently depreciate and amortize will likely have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA do not reflect the cash required to fund such replacements; and
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted net incomeNet Income (Loss) do not reflect the effect of earnings or charges resulting from matters that our management does not consider to be indicative of our ongoing operations. However, some of these charges (such as impairment, and other lease charges, acquisition costs and acquisitionlitigation costs) have recurred and may reoccur.
41


Depreciation and amortization primarily includes the depreciation of fixed assets, including equipment, owned buildings and leasehold improvements utilized in our restaurants, the amortization of franchise rights from our acquisitions of Burger King restaurants and the amortization of franchise fees paid to BKC.
BKC and PLK.
Impairment and other lease charges are determined through our assessment of the recoverability of property and equipment and intangible assets by determining whether the carrying value of these assets can be recovered over their respective remaining lives through undiscounted future operating cash flows. A potential impairment charge is evaluated whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable. Losses on sale-leaseback transactions are recognized when they are incurred. Lease charges are recorded for our obligations under the related leases for closed locations net of estimated sublease recoveries.
Interest expense consists primarily of interest expense associated with our $425.0 million Term Loan B borrowings and $75.0 million Term Loan B-1 borrowings, amortization of deferred financing costs, amortization of original issue discount, interest on revolving credit borrowings, ticking fees, payments required under our interest rate swap arrangement, and, through April 30, 2019, interest on the $275.0 million of 8% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2022 (the "8% Notes"), our prior 11.25% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2018
and unamortized bond premium.


(the "11.25% Notes"), amortization of deferred financing costs, amortization of bond premium and interest on revolving credit borrowings under our senior credit facility.
Recent and Future Events Affecting our Results of Operations
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on restaurant sales at our Burger King restaurants began during the week ended March 15, 2020. During the week ended March 29, 2020, comparable restaurant sales decreased 33.8% compared to the prior year week. Comparable restaurant sales declines at our Burger King restaurants began easing mid-April, and for the month of June the change in comparable restaurant sales was positive. For our Popeyes restaurants, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on restaurant sales started during the week ended March 22, 2020, and began easing mid-April.
In response to the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on our business operations and the continuing uncertainty in the economy in general, we have taken steps to adapt our business and strengthen and preserve our liquidity, including the following:
In March 2020, we closed the dining rooms in all our restaurants and modified operating hours in line with local ordinances and day-part sales trends. These closures were in effect for most of the second quarter of 2020, with each restaurant operating according to their respective local governmental guidelines as well as safety procedures developed by BKC and PLK. As individual states and local governments have allowed reopenings, we have continually evaluated the opportunity to re-open dining rooms. By the end of the year, approximately 35% of dining rooms have reopened, however, in most cases, guests have continued to rely on our drive-thru, carry-out and delivery service modes. Restaurant sales in the fourth quarter of 2020 included approximately 1% of eat-in traffic at our Burger King restaurants and 7% of eat-in traffic at our Popeyes restaurants, which are the highest we've seen since the onset of the pandemic.
We launched delivery services in March of 2020 at approximately 800 of our restaurants and have added additional third-party delivery partners as well as restaurant coverage over the course of the year. For the fourth quarter of 2020, delivery comprised approximately 3.5% of total restaurant sales and for all of 2020 delivery was approximately 2.4% of all sales.
We temporarily closed 46 restaurants in late March 2020 and early April 2020 that were geographically close to one of our other restaurants, and these closures were in effect for most of the second quarter of 2020. By the end of 2020, we had reopened all of these restaurants with the exception of two Burger King restaurants we permanently closed in the third quarter.
As discussed below, we increased revolving credit borrowing capacity under our Revolving Credit Facility (as defined below) by $30.8 million to a total of $145.8 million and borrowed Incremental Term B-1 Loans (as defined below) for net proceeds of $71.3 million after original issue discount to increase our liquidity and protect against the uncertainty of a prolonged pandemic.
We remain committed to active management of our expenditures and for the second quarter of 2020 limited spending mainly to necessary restaurant maintenance issues. For the full year, we reduced operating capital expenditures to $56.9 million from $134.9 million in 2019.
42


We reduced regional and corporate overhead by streamlining our regional management and support structure, improving our training process and instituted a 10% temporary reduction in all non-restaurant wages for the second quarter of 2020. Given our improved business trajectory, this reduction in wages was restored as of July 1, 2020.
As allowed under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act, as amended (the "CARES Act"),we deferred payment of the employer portion of Social Security taxes through the end of 2020. The amount of the cumulative deferral at the end of 2020 was approximately $21.6 million, of which 50% is payable on each of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022.
We negotiated with our landlords other than BKC to secure $5.8 million in deferral or abatement of 2020 cash rent obligations, of which $4.8 million was or is expected to be repaid over various periods beginning in the third quarter of 2020. We repaid $1.6 million related to these deferrals by the end of 2020.
During the second quarter of 2020, we optimized payment terms with our key vendors and suppliers and utilized deferral opportunities with our utility vendors. These reverted to normal payment terms in July of 2020. During the year, we experienced a number of minor and/or temporary supply chain issues. All such issues have been resolved.
We suspended any acquisition activity and share repurchases during the first quarter, which we subsequently reinstated during the fourth quarter.
Throughout the course of this evolving COVID-19 outbreak, we have been adapting our business in order to continue operating safely. To support the health and safety of our employees, beginning in March 2020 we mandated, among other things, the use of masks, sanitizers and temperature checks at the beginning of each shift for our team members as well as instituted contactless procedures in our restaurants. We also suspended all non-essential travel for our employees and implemented a work-from-home policy for all non-restaurant personnel effective through the second quarter of 2020. During the third quarter of 2020, administrative employees returned to the office on a voluntary basis in compliance with New York's phased re-opening.
Although the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted the Company's customer traffic, the immediate actions taken to continue drive-thru and carry-out business operations and secure additional liquidity have minimized the financial impact on the Company's results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. We believe our business model and world-class brands are ideally positioned to serve value and convenience-seeking customers through our drive-thru, at-the-counter for take-out, and delivery channels.
43


While significant uncertainty remains as to when or the manner in which the circumstances surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic will change, including but not limited to stock price volatility, lower customer traffic, governmental restrictions on restaurant businesses and the unpredictable economic environment, we have been nimble in adapting our operations to the realities of the marketplace and saw the results of these efforts in 2020. In 2020, we were able to increase our full year Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA by $25.4 million and $21.5 million, respectively, by managing food costs, optimizing labor hours despite higher wage rates, and controlling other restaurant-level and corporate overhead expenses.
Cambridge Acquisition
On April 30, 2019, we completed a merger with New CFH, LLC, a former subsidiary of Cambridge Franchise Holdings, LLC ("Cambridge") and acquired 165 Burger King® restaurants, 55 Popeyes® restaurants and six convenience stores (the "Cambridge Acquisition"). Cambridge received a total of approximately 14.9 million shares of our common stock after conversion of all preferred stock initially issued to Cambridge in the Cambridge Acquisition. All shares of common stock issued to Cambridge are subject to a two year restriction on sale or transfer, subject to certain limited exceptions.
Area Development and Remodeling Agreement
The Company, Carrols, Carrols LLC, and BKC entered into a new Area Development Agreement (the "ADA") which commenced on April 30, 2019 and was set to end on September 30, 2024 and which superseded the Operating Agreement dated as of May 30, 2012, as amended, between Carrols LLC and BKC. The ADA was amended and restated by all parties on January 4, 2021 (the "Amended ADA").
Under the ADA, Carrols LLC had agreed to open, build and operate a total of 200 new Burger King restaurants including 32 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2020, 41 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2021, 41 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2022, 40 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2023 and 39 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2024, subject to and in accordance with the terms of the ADA. Carrols LLC also had agreed under the ADA to remodel or upgrade a total of 748 Burger King restaurants to BKC’s Burger King of Tomorrow restaurant image, including 130 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2020, 118 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2021, 131 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2022, 138 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2023 and 141 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2024, subject to and in accordance with the terms of the ADA.
These development commitments were substantially reduced in the Amended ADA. Pursuant to the Amended ADA, Carrols LLC agreed to open, build and operate a total of 50 new Burger King restaurants, 80% of which must be in Kentucky, Tennessee and Indiana. This includes four Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2021, 10 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2022, 12 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2023, 12 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2024 and 12 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2025.
In addition, pursuant to the Amended ADA, BKC granted Carrols LLC franchise pre-approval to build new Burger King restaurants or acquire Burger King restaurants from Burger King franchisees with respect to 500 Burger King restaurants in the aggregate in (i) Kentucky, Tennessee and Indiana (excluding certain geographic areas in Indiana) and (ii) (a) 16 states, which include Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont and Virginia (subject to certain exceptions for certain limited geographic areas within certain states) and (b) any other geographic locations that Carrols LLC enters after the commencement date of the Amended ADA pursuant to BKC procedures subject to certain limitations.
Pursuant to the ADA and for a cost of $3.0 million, BKC had assigned to Carrols LLC the right of first refusal on the sale of franchisee-operated restaurants in 16 states and a limited number of counties in four additional states, and granted franchise pre-approval to acquire Burger King restaurants until the date that we have acquired more than an aggregate of an additional 500 Burger King restaurants excluding those restaurants we acquired in the
44


Cambridge Acquisition ("ADA ROFR"). The ADA ROFR was terminated in connection with the Amended ADA and an impairment charge of $2.0 million for the unamortized value remaining from the payment for the ADA ROFR was recorded in 2020.
BKC agreed to contribute $10 million to $12 million for upgrades of approximately 50 to 60 Burger King restaurants in 2019 and 2020, most of which have already been remodeled to the 20/20 image and where BKC is the landlord on the lease for such Burger King restaurants operated by Carrols LLC or an affiliate. In 2019, we received $10.0 million from BKC under this arrangement.
On October 1 of each year following the commencement date of the ADA, Carrols LLC was required to pay BKC pre-paid franchise fees in the following amounts to be applied to new Burger King restaurants opened and operated by Carrols LLC: (a) $350,000 on the commencement date of the ADA, (b) $1,600,000 on October 1, 2019, (c) $2,050,000 on October 1, 2020, (d) $2,050,000 on October 1, 2021, (e) $2,000,000 on October 1, 2022 and (f) $1,950,000 on October 1, 2023. The Amended ADA eliminated the requirement for any prepayments due and payable on and after October 1, 2020, and the $0.6 million balance of prepaid franchise fees paid under the ADA that had not yet been applied to new restaurant development was forfeited.
Through the Cambridge Acquisition, we have also assumed a development agreement for Popeyes®, which includes an assignment by PLK of its right of first refusal under its franchise agreements with its franchisees for acquisitions in two southern states, as well as a development commitment to open, build and operate approximately 80 new Popeyes® restaurants over six years.
Restaurant Acquisitions
From the beginning of 20152018 through December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, we have acquired 175278 restaurants from other Burger King and Popeyes franchisees of which 174 are operating at December 31, 2017, in the following transactions ($ in thousands):
Closing DateNumber of RestaurantsPurchase PriceNumber of Fee-Owned RestaurantsMarket Location
2018 Acquisitions:
February 13, 2018(1)$— New York
August 21, 2018(2)1,666 Detroit, Michigan
September 5, 2018(2)31 25,930 Western Virginia
October 2, 201810 10,506 South Carolina and Georgia
44 38,102 — 
2019 Acquisitions:
April 30, 2019(3)220 259,083 14Southeastern states, primarily TN, MS, LA
June 11, 201913 15,788 Baltimore, Maryland
August 20, 2019(2)1,108 Pennsylvania
234 275,979 14 
Total278 $314,081 14 
Closing Date Number of Restaurants Purchase Price Number of Fee-Owned RestaurantsMarket Location
2015 Acquisitions:       
March 31, 2015 4
 $794
  Northern Vermont
August 4, 2015(1)5
 663
  Charlotte, North Carolina
October 1, 2015(1)5
 5,044
 1Wheeling, West Virginia
October 20, 2015 1
 709
  Kalamazoo, Michigan
November 17, 2015 2
 618
  Evansville, Indiana
November 17, 2015 6
 10,945
 5Evansville, Indiana
December 1, 2015(1)23
 26,175
 10Detroit, Michigan
December 8, 2015 9
 7,802
  Northern New Jersey
  55
 52,750
 16 
2016 Acquisitions:       
February 23, 2016(1)12
 7,127
  Scranton/Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania
May 25, 2016 6
 12,080
 5Detroit, Michigan
July 14, 2016(1)4
 5,445
 3Detroit, Michigan
August 23, 2016 7
 8,755
 6Portland, Maine
October 4, 2016 3
 1,623
  Raleigh, North Carolina
November 15, 2016 17
 7,251
  Pittsburgh and Johnstown, Pennsylvania
December 1, 2016 7
 5,807
 1Columbus, Ohio
  56
 48,088
 15 
2017 Acquisitions:       
February 28, 2017 43
 20,366
  Cincinnati, Ohio
June 5, 2017(1)17
 16,355
  Baltimore, Maryland and Washington, DC
November 28, 2017 4
 1,202
  Maine
  64
 37,923
 
 
Total 175
 $138,761
 31 
(1)Acquisitions resulting from the exercise of our ROFR.
All(1)We recorded a bargain purchase gain because the fair value of assets acquired, largely representing a franchise right asset of $0.3 million, exceeded the 2017 acquiredtotal fair value of consideration paid by $0.2 million.
(2)Acquisitions resulting from the exercise of our right of first refusal on acquisitions in certain markets.
(3)The Cambridge Acquisition included 165 Burger King restaurants were leased properties. and 55 Popeyes restaurants.
The 20162019 acquired restaurants included 1514 fee-owned properties, of which 14six were subsequently sold in sale-leaseback transactions in 20162019 for net proceeds of $19.1 million. The 2015 acquired restaurants included 16 fee-owned properties of which 15$8.3 million and two were subsequently sold in sale-leasebacksale leaseback transactions in 2015 and 20162020 for net proceeds of $22.0$3.4 million. All of the 2018 acquired restaurants were leased properties.

45



The pro forma impact on the results of operations for the 20172019 acquired restaurants is included below. The pro forma results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred had the acquisitions been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented, nor are they necessarily indicative of any future consolidated operating results. This pro forma financial information does not give effect to any anticipated synergies, operating efficiencies or cost savings or any transaction costs related to the 20172019 acquired restaurants. The following table summarizes certain pro forma financial information related to our 20172019 operating results:results (in thousands):
 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017
Restaurant sales$1,114,642
Income from operations$33,323
Adjusted EBITDA$94,038
Year Ended
December 29, 2019
Restaurant sales$1,568,533 
Loss from operations$(299)
Pro Forma Adjusted EBITDA$94,139 
Capital Expenditures and Remodeling Commitment with BKC
On December 17, 2015, we and BKC entered into the Second Amendment to Operating Agreement (the "Amendment"), which amended the operating agreement and a subsequent amendment to the operating agreement, previously entered into between us and BKC in connection with our acquisition of restaurants from BKC in 2012. As amended, the operating agreement required that we remodel to BKC's current 20/20 image a cumulative total of 455 restaurants by December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, we were in compliance with the remodel requirement.
In addition, under a separate agreement we agreed to remodel 46 restaurants acquired in 2014 over a five year period beginning in 2014 and, at December 31, 2017, we had remodeled a total of 37 restaurants associated with this agreement. In 2017, we remodeled 34 restaurants including rebuilding five locations and relocating two restaurants within their trade area. At December 31, 2017, we had 618 restaurants with the 20/20 restaurant image, which included restaurants converted prior to our acquisition.
Under the operating agreement with BKC, beginning on January 1, 2016 and until we exceed operating 1,000 Burger King restaurants, a minimum of 10% of our annual new restaurant growth (including acquisitions) must come from the development of new Burger King restaurants (which includes restaurants we relocate within their market area); provided that for 2016 only, any required new restaurant development could be deferred and opened in 2017. At December 31, 2017, we were in compliance with this commitment and have completed the development of twelve restaurants.
In 2018, weWe expect that our capital expenditures before discretionary growth-related expenditures (i.e. new restaurant development and acquisitions)in 2021 will be $45approximately $65 million to $50$75 million, although the actual amount of capital expenditures may differ from these estimates. Capital expenditures in 2018 includewhich includes approximately 35% for remodeling 30 to 35existing restaurants, to the BKC 20/20 image standard. In addition, capital expenditures25% for the construction of 10eight new restaurants, and 20% for required ongoing capital maintenance expenditures.
In 2021, proceeds from sale/leaseback transactions related to 15 new units, of which 2 to 3 restaurants may be relocated within their respective markets, and remaining costs from 2017 construction late in the yearrestaurant development are expected to be $15approximately $8 million to $25$13 million. We will review on an ongoing basis our future remodeldevelopment and developmentremodel plans in relation to our available capital resourcesresources.
Refinancing of Indebtedness and alternate investment opportunities.our Senior Credit Facilities
On April 30, 2019, we entered into a new senior secured credit facility which provides for senior secured credit facilities in an aggregate principal amount of $550.0 million (the "Senior Credit Facilities"), consisting of (i) a term loan B facility in an aggregate principal amount of $425.0 million (the “Term Loan B Facility”), the entire amount of which was borrowed by us on April 30, 2019 and (ii) a revolving credit facility (including a sub-facility of $35.0 million for standby letters of credit) in an aggregate principal amount of $125.0 million (the "Revolving Credit Facility"). Borrowings under the Term Loan B Facility and the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a rate per annum, at our option, of (i) the Alternate Base Rate plus the applicable margin of 2.25% or (ii) the LIBOR Rate plus a margin of 3.25% (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities). The Term Loan B Facility matures on April 30, 2026 and the Revolving Credit Facility matures on April 30, 2024.
On December 13, 2019, the Company entered into the First Amendment to Credit Agreement which amended a financial covenant under the Senior Credit Facilities applicable solely with respect to the Revolving Credit Facility that previously required the Company to maintain quarterly a Total Net Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) of not greater than 4.75 to 1.00 (measured on a most recent four quarter basis), to now require that the Company maintain only a First Lien Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) of not greater than 5.75 to 1.00 (as measured on a most recent four quarter basis) if, and only if, on the last day of any fiscal quarter (beginning with the fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2019), the sum of the aggregate principal amount of outstanding revolving credit borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and the aggregate face amount of letters of credit issued under the Revolving Credit Facility (excluding undrawn letters of credit in an aggregate face amount up to $12.0 million) exceeds 35% of the aggregate amount of the maximum revolving credit borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. The First Amendment also reduced the aggregate maximum revolving credit borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility by $10.0 million to a total of $115.0 million.
As of December 29, 2019, there were $45.8 million of revolving credit borrowings outstanding and $11.6 million of letters of credit were issued under the Revolving Credit Facility. After reserving for issued letters of credit and outstanding revolving credit borrowings, $57.6 million was available for revolving credit borrowings under the Senior Credit Facilities at December 29, 2019.
46


On March 25, 2020, we entered into the Second Amendment to our Senior Credit Facilities (the "Second Amendment"). The Second Amendment increased the aggregate maximum commitments available for revolving credit borrowings (including standby letters of credit) under the revolving credit facility (the "Revolving Committed Amount") by $15.4 million to a total of $130.4 million.
The Second Amendment also amended the definition of Applicable Margin (such definition and all other definitions used herein and otherwise not defined herein shall be the meanings set forth in the Senior Credit Facilities) in the Credit Agreement to provide that on and after the date of the Second Amendment (the "Second Amendment Effective Date"), the Applicable Margin for borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility (including Letter of Credit Fees) shall be at a rate per annum equal to (a) for so long as the Revolving Committed Amount is greater than $115.0 million, (i) for the period commencing on the Second Amendment Effective Date and including the date that is 179 days after the Second Amendment Effective Date, 3.5% for LIBOR Rate Loans and 2.5% for Alternate Base Rate Loans, (ii) for the period commencing on the date that is 180 days after the Second Amendment Effective Date, through and including the date that is 269 days after the Second Amendment Effective Date, 4.25% for LIBOR Rate Loans and 3.25% for Alternate Base Rate Loans, (iii) for the period commencing on the date that is 270 days after the Second Amendment Effective Date, through and including the date that is 364 days after the Second Amendment Effective Date, 4.5% for LIBOR Rate Loans and 3.5% for Alternate Base Rate Loans and (iv) for the period commencing on the date that is 365 days after the Second Amendment Effective Date and thereafter, 4.75% for LIBOR Rate Loans and 3.75% for Alternate Base Rate Loans and (b) for so long as the Revolving Committed Amount is equal to or less than $115.0 million, 3.5% for LIBOR Rate Loans and 2.5% for Alternate Base Rate Loans.
The Second Amendment provides that beginning on the 180th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date and for so long as the Revolving Committed Amount is greater than $115.0 million, we shall pay to the Administrative Agent, for the ratable benefit of the Revolving Facility Lenders, a commitment fee (the "Ticking Fee") on the average daily amount of the Revolving Committed Amount at a rate per annum equal to (a) 0.125% for the 180th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date through and including the 269th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date, (b) 0.25% for the 270th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date through and including the 364th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date and (c) 1.00% for the 365th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date and thereafter. The Second Amendment provides that the Ticking Fee will be due and payable quarterly in arrears (calculated on a 360-day basis) on the last Business Day of each calendar quarter and will accrue from the 180th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date for so long as the Revolving Committed Amount is greater than $115.0 million. We recorded expense of $0.1 million related to these ticking fees in the year ended January 3, 2021.
The Second Amendment further provides that we shall use the proceeds of an Extension of Credit which results in the sum of the aggregate principal amount of outstanding Revolving Loans plus the aggregate amount of LOC Obligations equaling an amount in excess of $115.0 million, solely for our ongoing operations and our subsidiaries and shall not be held as cash on the balance sheet. Pursuant to the Letter Agreement, (the "Letter Agreement") dated as of March 25, 2020 among the Company, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Truist Bank, we agreed to defer rent payments totaling approximately $2.4 million per month under certain real property leases for the period between April 1, 2020 through and including June 30, 2020. We paid these amounts in full according to these terms on July 1, 2020.
On April 8, 2020, we entered into the Third Amendment to our Senior Credit Facilities which increased the aggregate maximum commitments available for revolving credit borrowings (including standby letters of credit) under the Revolving Credit Facility by $15.4 million to a total of $145.8 million.
On April 16, 2020, we entered into the Fourth Amendment to our Senior Credit Facilities (the "Fourth Amendment"). The Fourth Amendment permits us to incur and, if necessary, repay indebtedness incurred pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program (the "PPP") under the CARES Act. Subsequent to this amendment, we withdrew our application for relief under the PPP and returned the funds upon receipt.
On June 23, 2020 (the "Fifth Amendment Effective Date"), we entered into the Fifth Amendment to our Senior Credit Facilities (the "Fifth Amendment"). The Fifth Amendment increased the Term Loan (as defined in the
47


Senior Credit Facilities) borrowings in the aggregate principal amount of $75 million of Incremental Term B-1 Loans (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities). The Incremental Term B-1 Loans constitute a new tranche of Term Loans ranking pari passu in right of payment and security with the Initial Term Loans (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) for all purposes under the Senior Credit Facilities. The Incremental Term B-1 Loans have the same terms as outstanding borrowings under the Company's existing term loan B facility pursuant to and in accordance with the Senior Credit Facilities, provided that (i) borrowings under the Incremental Term B-1 Loans will bear interest at a rate per annum, at our option, of (a) the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) plus the applicable margin of 5.25% or (b) the LIBOR Rate (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) (which shall not be less than 1% for Incremental Term B-1 Loans) plus the applicable margin of 6.25% and (ii) certain prepayments of the Incremental Term B-1 Loans by us prior to the first anniversary of the Fifth Amendment Effective Date are subject to a premium to the Administrative Agent (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities), for the ratable account of each applicable Term Loan Lender (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) holding Incremental Term B-1 Loans on the date of such prepayment equal to the Applicable Make-Whole Amount (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) with respect to the principal amount of the Incremental Term B-1 Loans so prepaid. The principal amount of the Incremental Term B-1 Loans will amortize in an aggregate annual amount equal to 1% of the original principal amount of the Incremental Term B-1 Loans and shall be repayable in consecutive quarterly installments on the last day of our fiscal quarters beginning on the third fiscal quarter of 2020 with the remaining outstanding principal amount of the Incremental Term B-1 Loan and all accrued but unpaid interest and other amounts payable with respect to the Incremental Term B-1 Loan due on April 30, 2026 which is the Term Loan Maturity Date (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities).
As of January 3, 2021, there were no revolving credit borrowings outstanding and $9.7 million of letters of credit were issued under our Revolving Credit Facility. After reserving for issued letters of credit, $136.1 million was available for revolving credit borrowings under our Senior Credit Facilities at January 3, 2021.
Interest Rate Swap Agreement
We entered into a five year interest rate swap agreement commencing March 3, 2020 and ending February 28, 2025 with a notional amount of $220.0 million to swap variable rate interest payments (one-month LIBOR plus the applicable margin) under our Senior Credit Facilities for fixed interest payments bearing an interest rate of 0.915% plus the applicable margin in our Senior Credit Facilities.
Stock Repurchase Program
On August 2, 2019, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase plan (the "Repurchase Program") under which we may repurchase up to $25 million of our outstanding common stock. The authorization became effective August 2, 2019, and will expire 24 months thereafter, unless terminated earlier by the Board of Directors. Purchases under the Repurchase Program may be made from time to time in open market transactions at prevailing market prices or in privately negotiated transactions (including, without limitation, the use of Rule 10b5-1 plans) in compliance with applicable federal securities laws, including Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
During the year ended January 3, 2021, we repurchased 1,534,304 shares in open market transactions of our common stock at an average share price of $6.52 for a total cost of $10.0 million under the Repurchase Program. During the year ended December 29, 2019, we repurchased 553,112 shares in open market transactions at an average share price of $7.26 for a total cost of $4.0 million under the Repurchase Program.
We have no obligation to repurchase additional shares of stock under the Repurchase Program, and the timing, actual number and value of shares purchased will depend on our stock price, trading volume, general market and economic conditions and other factors.
Future Restaurant Closures
We evaluate the performance of our restaurants on an ongoing basis including an assessment of the current and future operating results of theeach restaurant in relation to its cash flow and future occupancy costs and, with
48


regard to franchise agreement renewals, the cost of required capital improvements. We may elect to close restaurants based on these evaluations.
In 2017,2020, excluding one restaurant relocated within its trade area, we closed twenty33 restaurants. We currently anticipate closing 20 to 25 restaurantsless than five restaurant closures in 2018, excluding2021 outside of any restaurants being relocated within their trade area at the end of their respective lease term.
Our determination of whether to close restaurants in the future is subject to further evaluation and may change. We may incur lease charges in the future from closures of underperforming restaurants prior to the expiration of their


contractual lease term. We do not believe that the future impact on our results of operations due to restaurant closures will be material, although there can be no assurance in this regard.
Reversal of Valuation Allowance on Deferred Income Tax Assets and the effect of other Tax law changes
We perform an assessment of positive and negative evidence regarding the realization of our net deferred income tax assets as required by ASC 740. For the year ended January 3, 2016, we determined that a valuation allowance was needed for all of our net deferred income tax assets, based on the required weight of positive and negative evidence under ASC 740, including consideration of our three-year cumulative losses at that time.
During the year ended January 1, 2017, we evaluated both positive and negative evidence to consider the reversal of the valuation allowance on our net deferred income tax assets and determined in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 that there was sufficient positive objective evidence to conclude that it is more likely than not our deferred income tax assets are realizable. As a result, in the fourth quarter of 2016 we recorded a $30.4 million income tax benefit to release the full valuation allowance against our net deferred income tax assets and to record an income tax provision for all of 2016 of $2.3 million.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which we refer to as the "Act", was enacted on December 22, 2017. The Act made significant changes to the Federal tax code, including a reduction in the Federal income tax statutory rate from 35% to 21%. We recorded a $0.8 million discrete tax benefit in the fourth quarter to remeasure our net deferred taxes due to the lowering of the Federal income tax statutory rate to 21%.
Effect of Minimum Wage Increases
Certain of the states and municipalities in which we operate have increased their minimum wage rates for 20182020 and in many cases have also approved additional increases for future periods. Most notably, New York State has increased the minimum wage applicable to our business to $11.75$13.75 an hour in 2018 (from $10.752020 from $12.75 per hour in 20172019 and $9.75 an$11.75 per hour in 2016)2018, with subsequent annual increases reaching $15.00 anper hour by July 1, 2021. Starting in 2015New York State has an Urban Youth Credit through 2022 from which we have been receiving New York State minimum wage tax credits totaling approximately $500,000 per year that partially offset these additional labor costs.since 2016. We had 128125 restaurants in New York State at December 31, 2017.as of January 3, 2021. We also have one restaurant in Massachusetts that has annual minimum wage increases reaching $15.00 per hour in 2023, 10 restaurants in New Jersey that have annual minimum wage increases reaching $15.00 per hour in 2024, and 45 total restaurants in Illinois and Maryland that also have annual minimum wage increases reaching $15.00 per hour in 2025. We typically attempt to offset the effects of wage inflation, at least in part, through periodic menu price increases. However, no assurance can be given that we will be able to offset these wage increases in the future.
Refinancing of Indebtedness and Amendment to Our Senior Credit Facility
49
On June 23, 2017, we issued an additional $75 million principal amount of 8% Notes at a premium of 106.5% in a private placement and used a portion of the net proceeds to repay all of our revolving credit borrowings under our amended senior credit facility and to pay related fees and expenses. We received net proceeds of approximately $35.5 million from the offering which will be used for working capital and general corporate purposes, including future restaurant acquisitions.

On June 20, 2017, we entered into an amendment to our senior credit facility to increase the permitted indebtedness for our second lien notes to a principal amount not to exceed $300.0 million in order to provide for the additional $75 million of 8% Notes issued on June 23, 2017.

Additionally, on January 13, 2017, we entered into an amendment to our senior credit facility to, among other things, increase the maximum revolving credit borrowings by $18.0 million to a total of $73.0 million.
Results of Operations
Fiscal 20172020 compared to Fiscal 2016 and to Fiscal 20152019
The following table highlights the key components of sales and the number of restaurants in operation for the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017, and January 3, 2016:2021 and December 29, 2019 (dollars in thousands):


  Year ended
  December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 1, 2016 
  (in thousands of dollars)
Restaurant Sales:       
Legacy restaurants $878,230
 $844,580
 $846,058
 
Acquired restaurants 210,302
 99,003
 12,946
 
Total $1,088,532
 $943,583
 $859,004
 
        
Change in Comparable Restaurant Sales % 5.2% 2.3% 7.4% 
Legacy restaurants 5.1% 2.3% 7.4% 
Acquired restaurants (1)
 5.8% 4.3% N/A
 
Year ended
January 3, 2021December 29, 2019
(in thousands of dollars)
Burger King restaurant sales$1,459,016 $1,398,660 
Popeyes restaurant sales88,486 53,856 
  Total restaurant sales$1,547,502 $1,452,516 
Change in comparable Burger King restaurant sales %(2.8)%2.2 %
Change in comparable Popeyes restaurant sales %(0.1)%
Burger King restaurants operating at beginning of year1,036 849 
New restaurants opened, including relocations(1)21 
Restaurants acquired— 179 
Restaurants closed, including relocations(1)(34)(13)
Restaurants operating at end of year1,009 1,036 
Popeyes restaurants operating at beginning of year65 — 
New restaurants opened, including relocations— 10 
Restaurants acquired— 55 
Restaurants operating at end of year65 65 
(1) AcquiredNew restaurants areopened in 2020 and 2019 included in comparable restaurant sales after they are owned for twelve months.one and two restaurants, respectively, that were closed and relocated within their market areas.
The following table sets forth the number of stores in operation at the end of 2017, 2016Restaurant Sales and 2015:
 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
Operating at beginning of year753
 705
 674
New restaurants opened11
 4
 
Acquired64
 56
 55
Closed (including relocations)(21) (12) (23)
Sold
 
 (1)
Operating at end of year807
 753
 705
Restaurant Sales. Other Revenue. Total restaurant sales in 20172020 increased 15.4%6.5% to $1,088.5$1,547.5 million from $943.6$1,452.5 million in 2016.2019. Comparable restaurant sales increased 5.2%decreased 2.7% due to an increase in average check of 4.0% and an increase in customer traffic of 1.2%. The effect of menu price increases in 201713.1% which was approximately 2.3%. Sales from the acquired restaurants were $210.3 million in 2017.
Restaurant sales in 2016 increased 9.8% and included a comparable restaurant sales increase of 2.3% driven by an increase in average check of 2.6%more than offset by a decrease in customer traffic of 0.3%13.9%. The comparable restaurant sales decline includes the significant sales declines we experienced in March (-16.8%) and sales fromApril (-21.7%) of 2020 during the acquired restaurantsonset of $99.0 million. This increase was partially offset by sales from the 53rd week of 2015 of $16.0 million.COVID-19 pandemic. The effect of menu price increases in 20162020 was approximately 2.4%1.6%. Comparable
Restaurant sales overall increased $95.0 million, which included $28.4 million from the impact of a 53rd week in fiscal 2020 and $95.7 million from including a full year of operations for the 200 restaurants acquired in 2019 as compared with eight months of operations in fiscal 2019. In fiscal 2019, we had other revenue of $10.2 million from six convenience stores acquired in the Cambridge Acquisition that are not included in restaurant sales in 2015 (on a comparable 52 week basis) increased 7.4%.
The following table sets forth, forabove. These stores were closed at the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017, and January 3, 2016 selected operating results as a percentageend of total restaurant sales:2019.
50


 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
Costs and expenses (all restaurants):     
Cost of sales28.0% 26.5% 28.0%
Restaurant wages and related expenses32.2% 31.6% 31.2%
Restaurant rent expense7.0% 6.9% 6.8%
Other restaurant operating expenses15.3% 15.8% 15.8%
Advertising expense4.1% 4.4% 3.8%
General and administrative expenses5.5% 5.8% 5.9%
Operating Costs and Expenses (percentages stated as a percentage of total restaurant sales unless otherwise noted).Cost of sales increased to 28.0% in 2017 from 26.5% in 2016 due primarily to higher commodity costs (1.1%), which included a 9.4% increase in beef prices compared to
The following table sets forth selected operating results for the prior year, higher promotional discounting (0.6%),years ended January 3, 2021 and December 29, 2019:


the negative impact of changes in product mix offset in part by the effect of menu price increases (0.7%) and the continued improvement in restaurant-level food and cash controls at our acquired restaurants.
Year Ended
January 3, 2021December 29, 2019
Costs and expenses (all restaurants):
Cost of sales29.3 %29.7 %
Restaurant wages and related expenses32.2 %33.4 %
Restaurant rent expense7.7 %7.4 %
Other restaurant operating expenses15.3 %15.7 %
Advertising expense3.9 %4.0 %
General and administrative expenses5.4 %5.8 %
Cost of sales decreased as a percentage of restaurant sales to 26.5%29.3% in 20162020 from 28.0%29.7% in 2015 due primarily to lower commodity costs (1.1%2019. This decrease reflected the positive impacts of improved operational efficiencies at our Burger King restaurants (0.8%), which included a 14.0% decrease in beef prices in 2016 compared to 2015, the effect of menu price increases (0.7%taken since the end of 2019 at our Burger King restaurants (0.5%), and the continued improvementinclusion of convenience stores in restaurant-level food and cash controlsthe prior year which had a higher cost of sales (0.6%). These positive impacts were offset by increased commodity costs at our acquiredBurger King restaurants partially(1.1%, including a 3.2% increase in ground beef prices compared to 2019) and the inclusion of delivery costs in 2020 (0.4%). The impact of higher promotional discounting during 2020 was offset by higher promotional discounting.a favorable sales mix.
Cost of sales at our Popeyes restaurants improved approximately 160 basis points over last year due to improved operations at those restaurants (0.1%). Cost of sales in the prior year related to the convenience stores we closed in the fourth quarter of 2019 was $9.2 million, or 0.6% of revenue in 2020.
Restaurant wages and related expenses increaseddecreased to 32.2% in 20172020 from 31.6%33.4% in 20162019 due to higherlabor adjustments we made during 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We were able to adjust our labor requirements and hours based on operating day part sales trends and in response to dining room closures. The impact of hourly labor rates. The increaserate increases in restaurant wages and related expenses2020, inclusive of minimum wage increases, was 5.6% at our legacy restaurants when compared to 31.6%the prior year period. This was more than offset through effective labor hour management in 2016 from 31.2% in 2015 was due primarily to increased hourly labor rates partially offset by lower restaurant-level incentive bonus accruals (0.2%).2020.
Restaurant rent expense increased slightly to 7.0%7.7% in 20172020 from 6.9%7.4% in 2016 primarily2019 due to incrementalthe sale-leaseback of 36 restaurant locations from the fourth quarter of 2019 through the end of 2020 which either previously did not incur rent from sale-leaseback transactions completedcosts or resulted in 2016 offset partially by leveraging of thehigher rent on the sales increases. Restaurant rent expense increased slightly to 6.9% in 2016 from 6.8% in 2015 due to lower amortization of deferred gains on sale-leaseback transactions.property.
Other restaurant operating expenses decreased to 15.3% in 20172020 from 15.8%15.7% in both 2016 and 2015. This reduction is2019 due primarily to leveraging of our fixed operating costs, including utilities andlower repair and maintenance expense, on higher sales volumes.costs (0.2%) and lower utility costs (0.2%).
Advertising expense decreased to 4.1%3.9% in 20172020 from 4.4%4.0% in 20162019 due to a reduction of local advertising spending inincentives received for certain of our markets in 2017 from the prior year. Advertising expense increased to 4.4% in 2016 from 3.8% in 2015 due primarily to the expiration of advertising credits at the end of 2015 that were associated with 2012 BKC restaurant equipment initiatives and an increase in local advertising in certain of our markets.remodeled Burger King restaurants.
Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA. As a result of the factors above, andas well as the acquisitionimpact of 175 restaurants since the beginning53rd week in fiscal 2020 of 2015,$6.3 million, Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA increased 4.2%$25.4 million to $146.5$181.6 million in 2017 compared to $140.62020 from $156.1 million in 2016 and $124.5 million in 2015.2019. For a reconciliation between Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA and income from operations to Restaurant-Level EBITDA see page 42.54.
  Year ended
  December 31, 2017 
% (1)
 January 1, 2017 
% (1)
 January 3, 2016 
% (1)
  (in thousands of dollars)
Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Margin:            
Legacy restaurants $121,487
 13.8% $127,539
 15.1% $122,911
 14.5%
Acquired restaurants 24,987
 11.9% 13,107
 13.2% 1,609
 12.4%
Total $146,474
 13.5% $140,646
 14.9% $124,520
 14.5%
(1) Restaurant-Level EBITDA margin is calculated as a percentage of restaurant sales for each respective group of restaurants.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses were $60.3decreased to $84.1 million in 20172020 from $84.7 million in 2019. We reduced regional and corporate overhead in 2020 by streamlining our regional management structure and making improvements to our training process, which offset the impact of increased overhead from the Cambridge Acquisition, as well as reducing travel by $1.4 million in 2020 compared to $55.02019. We instituted a 10% temporary reduction in non-restaurant wages for the second quarter of 2020, which reduced general
51


and administrative expenses by $1.0 million. This 10% temporary reduction in non-restaurant wages was restored as of July 1, 2020. The full impact of these administrative cost reductions was offset by $3.4 million higher administrative bonus accruals in 2020 as a result of favorable profitability in the period.
We incurred $1.4 million and $0.5 million in 2016,2020 and 2019, respectively, in administrative costs pertaining to non-recurring litigation and professional fees. In connection with our pause on new development in 2020, we recorded $3.5 million in expense for abandoned site development costs, including $0.6 million related to forfeiting prepaid franchise fees in connection with the Amended ADA. Administrative expenses in 2019 included $8.2 million more of acquisition and integration costs. General and administrative expenses excluding the non-recurring costs described above decreased as a percentage of total restaurant sales,revenues to 5.1% in 2020 from 5.8%5.2% in 2016 to 5.5% in 2017. The increase in total general and administrative expenses during 2017 was driven by additional field management and restaurant manager training costs related to the 2017 and 2016 acquisitions and an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $1.5 million from stock awards granted in 2017. These increases were partially offset by a $1.2 million decrease in incentive compensation accruals based on our operating results in relation to our plan in 2017 versus 2016.2019.
General and administrative expenses increased $4.4 million in 2016 to $55.0 million however, as a percentage of total restaurant sales, decreased to 5.8% in 2016 from 5.9% in 2015. The increase in total general and administrative expenses was due primarily to additional field management and restaurant manager training costs related to the 2016 and 2015 acquisitions, higher acquisition costs of $0.7 million and an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $0.6 million partially offset by a decrease in administrative bonuses of $1.8 million.


Adjusted EBITDA. As a result of the factorsabove, as well as an impact from the 53rd week in fiscal 2020 of $5.3 million, Adjusted EBITDA increased $1.9$21.5 million or 2.1% to $91.4$107.9 million in 20172020 from $89.5$86.4 million in 2016. Adjusted EBITDA increased 16.6% in 2016 from $76.7 million in 2015.2019.
For a reconciliation between net income and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA see page 42.54.
Depreciation and Amortization. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense to $54.2$81.7 million in 20172020 from $47.3$74.7 million in 20162019 was primarily due to our ongoing restaurant remodeling initiatives and our acquisitionacquisitions of restaurants in 2016 and 2017.2019 being included for a full year in 2020.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $7.5 million during 2016 from $39.8 million in 2015 due to our capital spending of $65.8 million on restaurant remodeling in 2016 and depreciation and amortization on the assets acquired in the 2015 and 2016 acquisitions.
Impairment and Other Lease Charges. ImpairmentWe recorded impairment and other lease charges were $2.8of $12.8 million in 2017 and included $0.72020 consisting of $2.0 million related to the impairment of the remaining unamortized value of our right of first refusal under our ADA with BKC, $5.0 million related to initial impairment charges for fifteen underperforming restaurants, $1.2 million of capital expenditures at previously impaired restaurants, $1.1 million related to initial impairment charges for five underperforming restaurants, $0.9 million ofand other lease charges of $4.6 million primarily duerelated to four restaurants and an acquired administrative office closedthe closure of 23 of our underperforming restaurant locations during the period and non-cash losses of $0.1 million associated with the sale-leaseback of one restaurant property.2020.
We recorded impairment and other lease charges during 2016 of $2.4$3.6 million including $0.9in 2019 and included $0.3 million forof capital expenditures at previously impaired restaurants, $0.2$1.3 million related to initial impairment charges for fourseven underperforming restaurants, and non-cash lossesother lease charges of $1.2$1.9 million associated withmostly related to the sale-leasebackclosing of seven restaurant properties.  the six convenience stores acquired in 2019 from Cambridge.
Other Income, and ExpenseNet. In 2017,2020, we recorded aother income, net, $0.3of $1.3 million gain primarily related to an insurance recovery from a fire at one restaurant. In 2016, we had a gainwhich consisted of $1.2 milliongains related to insurance recoveries from firesproperty damage at four of our restaurants of $2.1 million, a net gain on 12 sale-leaseback transactions of $0.2 million and a loss on disposal of assets of $1.0 million.
In 2019, we recorded other income, net, of $1.9 million, which consisted of a $1.9 million gain from a settlement with BKC for their approval of new restaurant development by other franchisees which unfavorably impacted our restaurants, a $0.6 million net gain on sale-leaseback transactions, a $0.2 million gain related to insurance recoveries from fire at two restaurants, a gain of $0.5 million related to a settlement for a partial condemnation of one of our operatingrestaurants and a loss on a disposal of restaurant properties, and an expenseequipment of $1.85 million related to a litigation settlement with our former Chairman and CEO.$0.8 million.
Interest Expense. The increase in interest expense to $21.7 million in 2017 from $18.3 million in 2016 is primarily the result of the issuance of an additional $75.0 million principal amount of 8.0% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2022 on June 23, 2017. This increase was offset in part by $0.5 million of bond premium amortization in 2017.
Interest expense decreased to $18.3$27.3 million in 20162020 from $18.6$27.9 million in 2015 primarily due to a reduction in our weighted average interest rate in 2016 from the issuance of $200 million of 8% Notes on April 29, 2015, with proceeds partially used to repay all of our $150 million of outstanding 11.25% Notes tendered pursuant to a cash tender offer and redemption.
2019. The weighted average interest rate on our long-term debt, excluding lease financing obligations, was 7.7%4.6% in 2017, 7.9%2020 and6.1% in 20162019.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt. We recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $7.4 million in 2019 in connection with the refinancing of the 8% Notes. The loss consisted of the write-off of unamortized debt costs, unamortized bond premium and 8.9% in 2015.additional redemption fees.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes. In2020, we recorded income tax expense of $6.3 million and our effective income tax rate was 27.2%. The difference to the Federal statutory rate for 2020 of 21% is primarily due to a charge in the period of $13.1 million to establish an incremental tax valuation allowance for certain income tax credits as they may expire prior to utilization, the tax benefit of state income taxes, and other discrete tax items.
The benefit for income taxes in 2019 of $12.1 million was at an effective tax rate for 2017, excludingof 27.5%, including discrete tax expense items was 8.2% and is lower thanof $0.5 million. The difference compared to the Federal statutory rate for 2019 of 21% is
52


primarily due to the effecttax benefit of fixedemployment tax credits relative to our 2017 pretax income as the benefits of these creditswhich are not directly related to the amount of pretax income reported inpre-tax loss and the period. We also recorded a $0.8 million discrete tax benefit in the fourth quarter to remeasure our net deferred taxes due to the lowering of the Federal statutory income tax rate to 21% under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
In 2016, we reversed the valuation allowance on all of our net deferred income tax assets resulting in a tax benefit of $30.4 million. Excluding the valuation allowance reversal, we recorded a provision forstate income taxes in 2016 of $2.3 million. The 2016 effective tax rate of 13.2%, exclusive of the valuation allowance reversal, is lower than the statutory tax rate primarily due to employment tax credits.taxes.
Net Income.Income (Loss). As a result of the above, our net incomeloss was $7.2$29.5 million in 2017,2020, or $0.16$0.58 per diluted share, compared to net incomeloss of $45.5$31.9 million in 2016,2019, or $1.01$0.74 per diluted share and net income of $4 in 2015, or $0.00 per diluted share.

53









Reconciliations of net income (loss) to EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income (loss) and income (loss) from operations to Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017, and January 3, 20162021 and December 29, 2019 are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended
January 3, 2021December 29, 2019
Reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:
Net income (loss)$(29,463)$(31,919)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes6,294 (12,123)
Interest expense27,283 27,856 
Depreciation and amortization81,727 74,674 
EBITDA85,841 58,488 
Impairment and other lease charges12,778 3,564 
Acquisition and integration costs (1)273 10,827 
Abandoned development costs (2)3,464 256 
Pre-opening costs (3)163 1,449 
Litigation costs and other professional expenses (4)1,384 502 
Other income, net (5)(6)(1,271)(1,911)
Stock compensation expense5,223 5,753 
Loss on extinguishment of debt— 7,443 
Adjusted EBITDA$107,855 $86,371 
Year Ended
January 3, 2021December 29, 2019
Reconciliation of Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA:
Income (loss) from operations$4,114 $(8,743)
Add:
General and administrative expenses84,051 84,734 
Acquisition and integration costs (1)— 2,364 
Pre-opening costs (3)163 1,449 
Depreciation and amortization81,727 74,674 
Impairment and other lease charges12,778 3,564 
Other income, net (5)(6)(1,271)(1,911)
Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA$181,562 $156,131 
54


 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
Reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:     
Net income$7,159
 $45,472
 $4
Provision (benefit) for income taxes604
 (28,085) 
Interest expense21,710
 18,315
 18,569
Depreciation and amortization54,159
 47,295
 39,845
EBITDA83,632
 82,997
 58,418
Impairment and other lease charges2,827
 2,355
 3,078
Acquisition costs (1)1,793
 1,853
 1,168
Gains on partial condemnation and fires (2)(362) (1,603) 
Litigation settlement (3)
 1,850
 
Stock compensation expense3,518
 2,053
 1,438
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 12,635
Adjusted EBITDA$91,408
 $89,505
 $76,737
Year Ended
January 3, 2021December 29, 2019
Reconciliation of Adjusted net loss:
Net loss$(29,463)$(31,919)
Add:
Impairment and other lease charges12,778 3,564 
Acquisition and integration costs (1)273 10,827 
Abandoned development costs (2)3,464 256 
Pre-opening costs (3)163 1,449 
Litigation and other professional expenses (4)1,384 502 
Other income, net (5)(6)(1,271)(1,911)
Loss on extinguishment of debt— 7,443 
Income tax effect on above adjustments (7)(4,199)(5,534)
Valuation allowance for deferred taxes (8)13,138 — 
Adjusted net loss$(3,733)$(15,323)
Adjusted diluted net loss per share (9)$(0.07)$(0.35)
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding50,75143,422
(1)Acquisition and integration costs for twelve months ended January 3, 2021 primarily include legal and professional fees incurred in connection with the acquisition of 165 Burger King and 55 Popeyes restaurants from Cambridge Franchise Holdings, LLC in 2019, which were included in general and administrative expense. Acquisition and integration costs for the twelve months ended December 29, 2019 of $10.8 million include certain legal and professional fees; corporate payroll, and other costs related to the integration of the Cambridge merger and one-time repair costs which are included in Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA.
(2)Abandoned development costs for the twelve months ended January 3, 2021 and December 29, 2019 represent the write-off of capitalized costs due to the abandoned development of future restaurant locations.
(3)Pre-opening costs for the twelve months ended January 3, 2021 and December 29, 2019 include training, labor and occupancy costs incurred during the construction of new restaurants.
(4)Litigation and other professional expenses for the twelve months ended January 3, 2021 and December 29, 2019 include costs pertaining to an ongoing lawsuit with one of the Company's former vendors, costs to settle a class action claim and other non-recurring professional service expenses.
(5)Other income, net for the twelve months ended January 3, 2021 included gains related to insurance recoveries from property damage at four of the Company's restaurants of $2.1 million, a net gain on 12 sale-leaseback transactions of $0.2 million and a loss on disposal of assets of $1.0 million.
(6)Other income, net for the twelve months ended December 29, 2019 included a $1.9 million gain related to a settlement with Burger King Corporation for the approval of new restaurant development by other franchisees which unfavorably impacted the Company's restaurants, net gains on sale-leaseback transactions of $0.6 million, a gain related to an insurance recovery from property damage at two of the Company's restaurants of $0.2 million and a loss on a disposal of restaurant equipment of $0.8 million.
(7)The income tax effect related to the adjustments to Adjusted Net Loss during the periods presented was calculated using an incremental income tax rate of 25.0% for the three and twelve months ended January 3, 2021 and December 29, 2019, respectively.
(8)Reflects the removal of the income tax provision recorded during the year ended January 3, 2021 for the establishment of a valuation allowance on certain federal income tax credits as they may expire prior to their utilization by the Company.
(9)Adjusted diluted net loss per share is calculated based on Adjusted net loss and the diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for the respective periods, where applicable.
55
Reconciliation of Restaurant-Level EBITDA:     
Income from operations$29,473
 $35,702
 $31,208
Add:     
General and administrative expenses60,348
 54,956
 50,515
Depreciation and amortization54,159
 47,295
 39,845
Impairment and other lease charges2,827
 2,355
 3,078
Other expense (income)(333) 338
 (126)
Restaurant-Level EBITDA$146,474
 $140,646
 $124,520


Reconciliation of Adjusted net income:     
Net income$7,159
 $45,472
 $4
Add:     
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 12,635
Impairment and other lease charges2,827
 2,355
 3,078
Acquisition costs (1)1,793
 1,853
 1,168
Gains on partial condemnation and fires (2)(362) (1,603) 
Litigation settlement (3)
 1,850
 
Income tax effect on above adjustments (4)(1,618) (1,693) (6,415)
Adjust income tax benefit from deferred tax adjustments (5)(762) (30,374) 2,959
Adjusted net income$9,037
 $17,860
 $13,429
Adjusted diluted net income per share (6)$0.20
 $0.40
 $0.30
(1)Acquisition costs included in general and administrative expense primarily include legal and professional fees incurred in connection with restaurant acquisitions, and in 2017, certain payroll and other costs associated with the wind-down of the corporate headquarters from the acquisition of Republic Foods, Inc.


(2)The year ended December 31, 2017 includes a gain of $0.4 million related to an insurance recovery from a fire at one of our restaurants. The year ended January 1, 2017 includes gains of $1.2 million related to insurance recoveries from fires at two of our restaurants and a gain of $0.5 million related to a settlement for a partial condemnation on one of our operating restaurant properties.
(3)Includes an expense of $1.85 million related to a litigation settlement.
(4)The income tax effect related to the adjustments (other than the deferred income tax adjustment) was calculated using an effective income tax rate of 38%.
(5)The provision (benefit) for income taxes in 2017 reflects a $0.8 million discrete tax benefit recorded in the fourth quarter to to remeasure our net deferred taxes due to the lowering of the Federal income tax rate to 21% under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act signed into law in the fourth quarter of 2017. The benefit for income taxes in 2016 reflects a $30.4 million income tax benefit recorded in the fourth quarter of 2016 to reverse the previously recorded valuation allowance on net deferred income tax assets as well as the full year deferred income tax provision of $2.3 million which was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2016. For comparability, when presenting 2016 Adjusted net income, the provision (benefit) for income taxes for each respective period is adjusted as if such valuation allowance had been reversed prior to 2016.
(6)Adjusted diluted net income per share is calculated based on Adjusted net income and the diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for the respective periods.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We do not have significant receivables or inventoryAs is common in the restaurant industry, we maintain relatively low levels of accounts receivable and inventories and receive trade credit based upon negotiated terms infor purchasing food products and other supplies. As a result, we may at times maintain current liabilities in excess of current assets, which results in a working capital deficit. We are able to operate with a substantial working capital deficit because:
restaurant operations are primarily conducted on a cash basis;
rapid turnover results in a limited investment in inventories; and
cash from sales is usually received before related liabilities for food, supplies and payroll become due.
On June 20, 2017, we entered into an amendment to our senior credit facility to, among other things, increase the permitted indebtedness of our second lien notes to a principal amount not to exceed $300.0 million in order to provide for the additional $75 million of the 8% Notes issued on June 23, 2017. On January 13, 2017, we entered into an amendment to our senior credit facility to, among other things, increase the maximum revolving credit borrowings by $18.0 million to a total of $73.0 million.
Interest payments under our debt obligations, capital expenditures including for our remodeling and new restaurant development initiatives, in 2018, payments of royalties and advertising to BKC and Popeyes and payments related to our lease obligations represent significant liquidity requirements for us, as well asnot including any discretionary expenditures for the acquisition or development of additional Burger King and Popeyes restaurants. We believe our cash balances, cash generated from our operations our cash balances and availability of revolving credit borrowings under our amended senior credit facility willSenior Credit Facilities provide sufficient cash availability to cover our anticipated working capital needs, capital expenditures and debt service requirements for the next twelve months.
Operating activities. Net cash provided from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 20162021 and December 29, 2019 was $72.8 million, $62.3$103.9 million and $70.7$48.7 million, respectively. Net cash provided by operating activities in 20172020 increased by $10.5$55.2 million compared to 20162019 due primarily to an increase of Adjusted EBITDA of $21.5 million and a increasechange in cash from the changes in the components of working capital of $10.3$19.0 million, primarily related to our deferral of the employer portion of social security taxes through the end of 2020 of $21.6 million.
Net cash provided from operating activities in 20162019 decreased by $8.4$32.1 million compared to 20152018 due primarily to a decrease in cash from the changes in the componentsreduction of working capitalAdjusted EBITDA of $20.3$16.6 million, partially offset by an increase in Adjusted EBITDAdeferred income tax liabilities of $12.8$11.5 million and a change in operating right-of use assets and operating lease liabilities of $4.0 million.
Investing activities. Net cash used for investing activities from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 20162021 and December 29, 2019 was $108.1 million, $96.2$47.9 million and $103.4$218.0 million, respectively. Net cash used for investing activities increased $11.9In 2020, in addition to our capital expenditures of $56.9 million, during 2017 compared to 2016, primarily due to lowerwe received net proceeds of $7.0 million from sale-leaseback transactions, of $49.3including properties purchased for sale-leaseback, and received $2.1 million offset by a reductionfrom property insurance recoveries.
In 2019, in addition to our capital expenditures of $20.6$134.9 million, $10.2we completed the Cambridge Acquisition which included approximately $113.8 million less acquisition spendingfor retirement of the Cambridge indebtedness net of cash, acquired fourteen Burger King restaurants from other franchisees for $16.9 million, and $7.6received net proceeds of $47.2 million less spending on the purchase of existing restaurants for future sale-leaseback. Net cash used for investing activities decreased $7.2 million during 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to a $44.5 million increase in proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions, and lower acquisition spending partially offset by higher capital expenditures of $37.2 million.


including properties purchased for sale-leaseback.
Capital expenditures are a large component of our investing activities and include: (1) new restaurant development, which may include the purchase of real estate; (2) restaurant remodeling, which includes the renovation or rebuilding of the interior and exterior of our existing restaurants including expenses associated with our franchise agreement renewals and certain restaurants that we acquire; (3) other restaurant capital expenditures, which include capital maintenance expenditures for the ongoing reinvestment and enhancement of our restaurants, and from time to time, to support BKC’s initiatives; and (4) corporate and restaurant information systems, including expenditures for our point-of-sale software for restaurants that we acquire.
56


The following table sets forth our capital expenditures for the periods presented (dollar amounts in thousands):
Year Ended January 3, 2021:
New restaurant development$17,824 
Restaurant remodeling15,317 
Other restaurant capital expenditures13,064 
Corporate and restaurant information systems10,685 
Total capital expenditures$56,890 
Number of new restaurant openings including relocations
Year Ended December 29, 2019:
New restaurant development$53,596 
Restaurant remodeling50,383 
Other restaurant capital expenditures18,922 
Corporate and restaurant information systems11,978 
Total capital expenditures$134,879 
Number of new restaurant openings including relocations31 
Year Ended December 31, 2017:  
New restaurant development $14,759
Restaurant remodeling 33,504
Other restaurant capital expenditures 18,926
Corporate and restaurant information systems 6,327
Total capital expenditures $73,516
Number of new restaurant openings including relocations 11
Year Ended January 1, 2017:  
New restaurant development $8,228
Restaurant remodeling 65,767
Other restaurant capital expenditures 15,168
Corporate and restaurant information systems 4,936
Total capital expenditures $94,099
Number of new restaurant openings including relocations 4
Year Ended January 3, 2016:  
New restaurant development $574
Restaurant remodeling 41,582
Other restaurant capital expenditures 10,772
Corporate and restaurant information systems 3,920
Total capital expenditures $56,848
Number of new restaurant openings including relocations 1
As discussed above,Financing activities. Net cash provided by financing activities in 2017, we acquired 64 restaurants in three transactions for a total cash purchase price of $37.9 million. In 2016, we acquired 56 restaurants in seven transactions for a total cash purchase price of $48.12020 was $5.9 million and in 2015 we acquired 55 restaurants in eight transactions for total cash purchase price of $52.8 million.
Investing activities also included sale-leaseback transactions related to our restaurant properties, primarily related to fee-owned properties acquired$71.3 million in restaurant acquisitions, the net proceeds from which were $4.3issuance of the Incremental Term B-1 Loans, net repayments of our revolving credit borrowings of $45.8 million, in 2017, $53.6 million in 2016 and $9.1 million in 2015. The net proceeds from these sales in 2016 were used to fund our remodeling initiatives, acquisitionpurchases of restaurants and other cash requirements.
treasury shares of $10.1 million. We also had expenditures related toincurred $3.3 million of costs associated with the purchasefinancing long-term debt, made principal payments on term loan facilities of restaurant properties to be sold in sale-leaseback transactions$4.6 million, made principal payments on finance leases of $1.4$1.6 million, in 2017, $9.0 million in 2016 and $3.5 million in 2015.repurchased shares of our common stock for $10.0 million.
Financing activities.Net cash provided fromby financing activities in 20172019 was $62.7$168.3 million, due primarily to the proceeds of $79.9 million from the issuanceTerm Loan B Facility of the additional $75.0$422.9 million principal amount of 8% Notes at a premium offset by the net repayment of revolving credit borrowings of $13.5 million and principal payments on capital leases of $1.2 million.
Net cash provided from financing activities in 2016 was $13.7 million due primarily tocombined with net revolving credit borrowings of $13.5$45.8 million under the Revolving Credit Facility and the redemption of the 8.0% Notes including premium and fees of $280.5 million. We also incurred $11.5 million of costs associated with the Senior Credit Facilities, made principal payments on finance leases of $2.2 million, and repurchased shares of our common stock for $4.0 million.
Senior Credit FacilitiesOn April 30, 2019, we entered into the Senior Credit Facilities in 2016.
8% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes. The $275 millionan aggregate principal amount of 8%$550.0 million, consisting of (i) a Term Loan B Facility in an aggregate principal amount of $425.0 million maturing on April 30, 2026 and (ii) a Revolving Credit Facility (including a sub-facility of $35.0 million for standby letters of credit) in an aggregate principal amount of $125.0 million maturing on April 30, 2024.
The net proceeds from borrowings under the Term Loan B Facility were $422.9 million after original issue discount and were used to (i) refinance the indebtedness of Carrols Restaurant Group, including redemption of $275.0 million of 8.0% Notes matureand accrued interest thereon at a redemption price of 102%, (ii) the retirement of outstanding Cambridge indebtedness and (iii) the payment of fees and expenses in connection with the Cambridge Acquisition and the Senior Credit Facilities. The proceeds of the Revolving Credit Facility will finance ongoing working capital and other general corporate purposes, including permitted acquisitions and required expenditures under development agreements. In connection with these transactions, we recognized a loss of $7.4 million on Maythe extinguishment of debt.
On December 13, 2019, we entered into the First Amendment to Credit Agreement which amended a financial covenant under the Senior Credit Facilities applicable solely with respect to the Revolving Credit Facility that previously required the Company to maintain quarterly a Total Net Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) of not greater than 4.75 to 1.00 (measured on a most recent four quarter basis), to now require that the Company maintain only a First Lien Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) of not greater than 5.75 to 1.00 (as measured on a most recent four quarter basis) if, and only if, on the last day of any fiscal quarter (beginning with the fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2019), the sum of the aggregate principal amount of outstanding revolving credit borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and the aggregate face amount of letters of credit issued under the Revolving Credit Facility (excluding undrawn letters of credit in an aggregate face amount up to $12.0 million) exceeds 35% of the aggregate amount of the maximum revolving credit borrowings
57


under the Revolving Credit Facility. The First Amendment also reduced the aggregate maximum revolving credit borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility by $10.0 million to a total of $115.0 million.
On March 25, 2020, the Company entered into the Second Amendment to its Senior Credit Facilities (the "Second Amendment"). The Second Amendment increased the aggregate maximum commitments available for revolving credit borrowings (including standby letters of credit) under the Revolving Credit Facility (the "Revolving Committed Amount") by $15.4 million to a total of $130.4 million.
The Second Amendment also amended the definition of Applicable Margin (such definition and all other definitions used herein and otherwise not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Senior Credit Facilities) to provide that on and after the date of the Second Amendment (the "Second Amendment Effective Date"), the Applicable Margin for borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility (including Letter of Credit Fees) shall be at a rate per annum equal to (a) for so long as the Revolving Committed Amount is greater than $115.0 million, (i) for the period commencing on the Second Amendment Effective Date and including the date that is 179 days after the Second Amendment Effective Date, 3.5% for LIBOR Rate Loans and 2.5% for Alternate Base Rate Loans, (ii) for the period commencing on the date that is 180 days after the Second Amendment Effective Date, through and including the date that is 269 days after the Second Amendment Effective Date, 4.25% for LIBOR Rate Loans and 3.25% for Alternate Base Rate Loans, (iii) for the period commencing on the date that is 270 days after the Second Amendment Effective Date, through and including the date that is 364 days after the Second Amendment Effective Date, 4.5% for LIBOR Rate Loans and 3.5% for Alternate Base Rate Loans and (iv) for the period commencing on the date that is 365 days after the Second Amendment Effective Date and thereafter, 4.75% for LIBOR Rate Loans and 3.75% for Alternate Base Rate Loans and (b) for so long as the Revolving Committed Amount is equal to or less than $115.0 million, 3.5% for LIBOR Rate Loans and 2.5% for Alternate Base Rate Loans.
The Second Amendment also provides that beginning on the 180th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date and for so long as the Revolving Committed Amount is greater than $115.0 million, the Company shall pay to the Administrative Agent, for the ratable benefit of the Revolving Facility Lenders, a commitment fee (the "Ticking Fee") on the average daily amount of the Revolving Committed Amount at a rate per annum equal to (a) 0.125% for the 180th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date through and including the 269th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date, (b) 0.25% for the 270th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date through and including the 364th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date and (c) 1.00% for the 365th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date and thereafter. The Second Amendment provides that the Ticking Fee will be due and payable quarterly in arrears (calculated on a 360-day basis) on the last Business Day of each calendar quarter and will accrue from the 180th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date for so long as the Revolving Committed Amount is greater than $115.0 million. The Second Amendment also provides that the Company shall use the proceeds of an Extension of Credit which results in the sum of the aggregate principal amount of outstanding Revolving Loans plus the aggregate amount of LOC Obligations equaling an amount in excess of $115.0 million, solely for ongoing operations of the Company and its subsidiaries and shall not be held as cash on the balance sheet. Pursuant to the Letter Agreement dated as of March 25, 2020 among the Company, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Truist Bank, the Company agreed to defer rent payments totaling approximately $2.4 million per month under certain real property leases for the period between April 1, 2022. Interest2020 through and including June 30, 2020. The Company paid these amounts in full according to these terms on July 1, 2020.
On April 8, 2020, the Company entered into the Third Amendment to its Senior Credit Facilities which increased the aggregate maximum commitments available for revolving credit borrowings (including standby letters of credit) under the Revolving Credit Facility by $15.4 million to a total of $145.8 million.
On April 16, 2020, the Company entered into the Fourth Amendment to its Senior Credit Facilities (the "Fourth Amendment"). The Fourth Amendment permits the Company to incur and, if necessary, repay indebtedness incurred pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program (the "PPP") under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act, as amended (the "CARES Act"). Subsequent to this amendment, the Company withdrew its application for relief under the PPP and returned the funds upon receipt.
On June 23, 2020 (the "Fifth Amendment Effective Date"), the Company entered into the Fifth Amendment to its Senior Credit Facilities (the "Fifth Amendment"). The Fifth Amendment increased the Term Loan (as defined in
58


the Senior Credit Facilities) borrowings in the aggregate principal amount of $75 million of Incremental Term B-1 Loans (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities). The Incremental Term B-1 Loans constitute a new tranche of Term Loans ranking pari passu in right of payment and security with the Initial Term Loans for all purposes under the Senior Credit Facilities. The Incremental Term B-1 Loans have the same terms as outstanding borrowings under the Company's existing term loan B facility pursuant to and in accordance with the Senior Credit Facilities, provided that (i) borrowings under the Incremental Term B-1 Loans will bear interest at a rate per annum, at the Company’s option, of (a) the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) plus the applicable margin of 5.25% or (b) the LIBOR Rate (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) (which shall not be less than 1% for Incremental Term B-1 Loans) plus the applicable margin of 6.25% and (ii) certain prepayments of the Incremental Term B-1 Loans by the Company prior to the first anniversary of the Fifth Amendment Effective Date are subject to a premium to the Administrative Agent (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities), for the ratable account of each applicable Term Loan Lender (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) holding Incremental Term B-1 Loans on the date of such prepayment equal to the Applicable Make-Whole Amount (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) with respect to the principal amount of the Incremental Term B-1 Loans so prepaid. The principal amount of the Incremental Term B-1 Loans will amortize in an aggregate annual amount equal to 1% of the original principal amount of the Incremental Term B-1 Loans and shall be repayable in consecutive quarterly installments on the last day of the Company's fiscal quarters beginning on the third fiscal quarter of 2020 with the remaining outstanding principal amount of the Incremental Term B-1 Loan and all accrued but unpaid interest and other amounts payable with respect to the Incremental Term B-1 Loan due on April 30, 2026 which is the Term Loan Maturity Date (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities).
The net proceeds of the Incremental Term B-1 Loans were $71.3 million after original issue discount and were used for general corporate purposes, including repayment of the outstanding balance of the Revolving Credit Facility.
At January 3, 2021, borrowings under our Senior Credit Facilities bore interest as follows:
(i) Revolving Credit Facility: at a rate per annum equal to (a) the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) plus 2.50% or (b) LIBOR Rate (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) plus 3.50%.
(ii) Term Loan B borrowings: at a rate per annum equal to (a) the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) plus 2.25% or (b) LIBOR Rate (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) plus 3.25%.
(iii) Term Loan B-1 borrowings: at a rate per annum, at our option, of (a) the Alternate Base Rate plus the applicable margin of 5.25% or (b) the LIBOR Rate (which shall not be less than 1% for Incremental Term B-1 Loans) plus the applicable margin of 6.25%.
The Term Loan B and B-1 borrowings are due and payable semi-annuallyin quarterly installments, which began on May 1September 30, 2019. Amounts outstanding at January 3, 2021 are due and November 1. The 8% Notes are guaranteed by our material subsidiaries andpayable as follows:
(i) twenty-one quarterly installments of $1.3 million;
(ii) one final payment of $467.0 million on April 30, 2026.
Our obligations under the Senior Credit Facilities are secured by second-priorityfirst priority liens on substantially all of ourthe assets of the Company and our subsidiaries' assetssubsidiary guarantors (including a pledge of all of the capital stock and equity interests of our subsidiaries).


The 8% Notes are redeemable at our option in whole or in part at any time after May 1, 2018 at a price of 104% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, if redeemed before May 1, 2019, 102% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, if redeemed after May 1, 2019 but before May 1, 2020 and 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, if redeemed after May 1, 2020. Prior to May 1, 2018, we may redeem some or all of the 8% Notes at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount of each 8% Note plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, and a make-whole premium. In addition, the indenture governing the 8% Notes also provides that we may redeem up to 35% of the 8% Notes using the proceeds of certain equity offerings completed before May 1, 2018.
The 8% Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed, unconditionally and in full by our subsidiaries which are directly or indirectly 100% owned by us. Separate condensed consolidating information is not included because Carrols Restaurant Group is a holding company that has no independent assets or operations. There are no significant restrictions on our ability or any of the guarantor subsidiaries' ability to obtain funds from its respective subsidiaries. All consolidated amounts in our financial statements are representative of the combined guarantors.
The indenture governing the 8% Notes includes certain covenants, including limitations and restrictions on our and our subsidiaries who are guarantors under such indenture to, among other things: incur indebtedness or issue preferred stock; incur liens; pay dividends or make distributions in respect of capital stock or make certain other restricted payments or investments; sell assets; agree to payment restrictions affecting certain subsidiaries; enter into transaction with affiliates; or merge, consolidate or sell substantially all of our assets. We were in compliance as of December 31, 2017 with the restrictive covenants of the indenture governing the 8% Notes.
The indenture governing the 8% Notes and the security agreement provide that any capital stock and equity interests of any of our subsidiaries will be excluded from the collateral to the extent that the par value, book value or market value of such capital stock or equity interests exceeds 20% of the aggregate principal amount of the 8% Notes then outstanding.
The indenture governing the 8% Notes contains customary default provisions, including without limitation, a cross default provision pursuant to which it is an event of default under the 8% Notes and the indenture governing the 8% Notes if there is a default under any of our indebtedness having an outstanding principal amount of $20.0 million or more which results in the acceleration of such indebtedness prior to its stated maturity or is caused by a failure to pay principal when due.
Senior Credit Facility. On May 30, 2012, we entered into a senior credit facility, which was most recently amended onJune 20, 2017 to increase the permitted indebtedness of our second lien notes to a principal amount not to exceed $300.0 million in order to provide for the additional $75 million principal amount of the 8% Notes issued on June 23, 2017. On January 13, 2017, we entered into an amendment to our senior credit facility to, among other things, increase the maximum revolving credit borrowings to $73.0 million (including $20.0 million available for letters of credit)subsidiary guarantors). The amended senior credit facility also provides for potential incremental borrowing increases of up to $25.0 million, in the aggregate, and will mature on February 12, 2021.
At December 31, 2017 there were no revolving credit borrowings outstanding and $12.8 million of letters of credit were issued under the amended senior credit facility. After reserving for issued letters of credit, $60.2 million was available for revolving credit borrowings under the amended senior credit facility at December 31, 2017.
Borrowings under the amended senior credit facility bear interest at a rate per annum, at our option, based on (all terms as defined in our amended senior credit facility):
(i) the Alternate Base Rate plus the applicable margin of 1.75% to 2.75% based on the our Adjusted Leverage Ratio, or
(ii) the LIBOR Rate plus the applicable margin of 2.75% to 3.75% based on the our Adjusted Leverage Ratio.
At December 31, 2017, our Alternate Base Rate margin was 1.75% and our LIBOR Rate margin was 2.75% based on our Adjusted Leverage Ratio.
Our obligations under the amended senior credit facility are guaranteed by our subsidiaries and are secured by first priority liens on substantially all of our assets and those of our subsidiaries, including a pledge of all of the capital stock and equity interests of our subsidiaries.


Under the amended senior credit facility,Senior Credit Facilities, we arewill be required to make mandatory prepayments of borrowings with excess cash flow (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) and in the event of dispositions of assets, debt issuances and insurance and condemnation proceeds (all subject to certain exceptions).
The amended senior credit facility containsSenior Credit Facilities contain certain covenants, including, without limitation, those limiting ourthe Company's and our subsidiaries'the subsidiary guarantors’ ability to, among other things, incur indebtedness, incur liens, sell or acquire assets or businesses, change the character of its business in allany material respects, engage in transactions with related parties, make certain investments, make certain restricted payments or pay dividends. In addition,
Under the amended senior credit facility requires us to meet certain financial ratios, including a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, Adjusted Leverage Ratio and First Lien Leverage Ratio (all as defined under the amended senior credit facility). We were in compliance with the covenants under our senior credit facility at December 31, 2017.
The amended senior credit facility contains customary default provisions, including thatSenior Credit Facilities, the lenders may terminate their obligation to advance and may declare the unpaid balance of borrowings, or any part thereof, immediately due and payable upon the occurrence and during the continuance of customary defaults which include, without limitation, payment default, covenant defaults,
59


bankruptcy type defaults, cross-defaultsdefaults on other indebtedness, judgments or upon the occurrence of a change of control.control (as specified therein).
As of January 3, 2021, there were no revolving credit borrowings outstanding and $9.7 million of letters of credit issued under the Revolving Credit Facility. After reserving for issued letters of credit and outstanding revolving credit borrowings, $136.1 million was available for revolving credit borrowings at January 3, 2021 under the Revolving Credit Facility. We were in compliance with the financial covenants under our Senior Credit Facilities at January 3, 2021.
Prior Senior Credit Facility.On May 30, 2012, we entered into a senior credit facility (the "prior senior credit facility"), which was most recently amended on June 20, 2017 to increase the permitted indebtedness of our 8% Notes to a principal amount not to exceed $300.0 million in order to provide for the additional $75 million principal amount of the 8% Notes issued on June 23, 2017. Previously, on January 13, 2017, we entered into an amendment to our prior senior credit facility to, among other things, increase maximum revolving credit borrowings to $125.0 million (including $20.0 million available for letters of credit). The prior senior credit facility also provided for potential incremental borrowing increases of up to $25.0 million, in the aggregate.
Borrowings under the prior senior credit facility bore interest at a rate per annum, at our option, of:
(i) the Alternate Base Rate plus the applicable margin of 1.75% to 2.75% based on our Adjusted Leverage Ratio, or
(ii) the LIBOR Rate plus the applicable margin of 2.75% to 3.75% based on our Adjusted Leverage Ratio (all terms as defined under the prior senior credit facility).
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2017January 3, 2021 (in thousands):
 Payments due by period
Contractual ObligationsTotalLess than
1 Year
1 – 3
Years
3 – 5
Years
More than
5 Years
Long-term debt obligations, including interest (1)$618,092 $28,938 $57,138 $56,168 $475,848 
Finance lease obligations, including interest (2)1,020 583 308 70 59 
Operating lease obligations (3)1,364,662 99,191 196,855 191,466 877,150 
Lease financing obligations, including interest (4)1,451 110 1,341 — — 
Total contractual obligations$1,985,225 $128,822 $255,642 $247,704 $1,353,057 
  Payments due by period
Contractual Obligations Total 
Less than
1 Year
 
1 – 3
Years
 
3 – 5
Years
 
More than
5 Years
Long-term debt obligations, including interest (1) $374,000
 $22,000
 $44,000
 $308,000
 $
Capital lease obligations, including interest (2) 6,447
 2,166
 3,592
 506
 183
Operating lease obligations (3) 931,670
 68,336
 132,916
 129,517
��600,901
Lease financing obligations, including interest (4) 1,774
 106
 216
 221
 1,231
Total contractual obligations $1,313,891
 $92,608
 $180,724
 $438,244
 $602,315
(1)Our long term debt at January 3, 2021 included $493.3 million of Term Loan B and B-1 borrowings under our Senior Credit Facilities and no borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility. Total interest payments on term loan borrowings under our Senior Credit Facilities of $124.8 million for all years presented are included at the coupon rate of 5.74% per annum.
(2)Includes total interest of $0.1 million for all years presented.
(1)Our long term debt at December 31, 2017 included $275.0 million of 8% Notes. Total interest payments on our Notes of $99.0 million for all years presented are included at the coupon rate of 8%.
(2)Includes total interest of $0.8 million for all years presented.
(3)Represents the aggregate minimum lease payments under operating leases. Many of our leases also require contingent rent based on a percentage of sales in addition to the minimum base rent and require expenses incidental to the use of the property all of which have been excluded from this table.
(4)Includes total interest of $0.6 million for all years presented.
(3)Includes total interest of $512.9 million for all years presented.
(4)Includes total interest of $0.3 million for all years presented.
We have not included obligations under our postretirement medical benefit plans in the contractual obligations table as our postretirement plan is not required to be funded in advance, but is funded as retiree medical claims are paid. Also excluded from the contractual obligations table are payments we may make for workers' compensation, general liability and employee healthcare claims for which we pay all claims, subject to annual stop-loss limitations both for individual claims and claims in the aggregate. The majority of our recorded liabilities related to self-insured employee health and insurance plans represent estimated reserves for incurred claims that have yet to be filed or settled. The total of these liabilities was $8.0$9.9 million at December 31, 2017.January 3, 2021.
Future restaurant remodeling obligations to BKC have also been excluded from the table above as well as contractual obligations related to royalties and advertising payable to BKC.
Long-Term Debt Obligations. Refer to Note 8 of our consolidated financial statements for details of our long-term debt.
60


Lease Guarantees. Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc. ("Fiesta"), our former wholly-owned subsidiary, was spun-off in 2012 to our stockholders. As of December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, we are a guarantor under 2718 Fiesta restaurant property leases, of which all except for two are still operating, with lease terms expiring on various dates through 2030, and we are the primary lessee on five Fiesta restaurant property


leases, which we sublease to Fiesta.2030. We are fully liable for all obligations under the terms of the leases in the event that Fiesta fails to pay any sums due under the lease, subject to indemnification provisions of the separation and distribution agreement entered into in connection with the spin-off.
The maximum potential liability for future rental payments we could be required to make under these leases at December 31, 2017January 3, 2021 was $20.3$13.6 million. The obligations under these leases will generally continue to decrease over time as these operating leases expire. No payments have been made to date and none are expected to be required to be made in the future. We have not recorded a liability for those guarantees in accordance with ASC 460 - Guarantees as Fiesta has indemnified us for all such obligations and we did not believe it was probable we would be required to perform under any of the guarantees or direct obligations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements other than our operating leases, which are primarily for our restaurant properties and not recorded on our consolidated balance sheet.arrangements.
Inflation
The inflationary factors that have historically affected our results of operations include increases in food and paper costs, labor and other operating expenses, the cost of providing medical and prescription drug insurance to our employees and energy costs. Wages paid in our restaurants are impacted by changes in the Federalfederal and state hourly minimum wage rates and the Fair Labor Standards Act. Accordingly, changes in the Federalfederal and state hourly minimum wage rates directly affect our labor costs. We typically attempt to offset the effect of inflation, at least in part, through periodic menu price increases and various cost reduction programs. However, no assurance can be given that we will be able to offset such inflationary cost increases in the future.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Preparing consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by the application of our accounting policies. Our significant accounting policies are described in the “Significant Accounting Policies” footnote in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. Critical accounting estimates are those that require application of management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods.
Sales recognition at our restaurants is straightforward as customers pay for products at the time of sale and inventory turns over very quickly. Payments to vendors for products sold in the restaurants are generally settled within 30 days. The earnings reporting process is covered by our system of internal controls and generally does not require significant management estimates and judgments. However, critical accounting estimates and judgments, as noted below, are inherent in the assessment and recording of the fair market values of acquired restaurant assets and liabilities, insurance liabilities, assessing impairment of long-lived assets, lease accounting matters and the valuation of deferred income tax assets, assessing impairment of long-lived assets and lease accounting matters.assets. While we apply our judgment based on assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, actual results could vary from these assumptions. It is possible that materially different amounts would be reported using different assumptions.
Acquisition Accounting. We account for business combinations under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, "Business Combinations" ("ASC 805"). As required by ASC 805, assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are recorded at their respective fair values as of the business combination date. The most difficult estimations of individual fair values are those involving long-lived assets, such as property, equipment, favorable and unfavorable leases and intangible assets. We use available information to make these fair value determinations and, when necessary, engage an independent valuation specialist to assist in the fair value determination of favorable or unfavorable leases and intangible assets.
Insurance Liabilities. The amount of liability we record for claims related to insurance requires us to make judgments about the amount of expenses that will ultimately be incurred. We are insured for certain losses related to
61


workers’ compensation, general liability and medical insurance claims under policies where we pay all claims, subject to annual stop-loss insurance limitations both for individual claims and claims in the aggregate. We record insurance


liabilities based on historical trends, which are continually monitored, and adjust accruals as warranted by changing circumstances. Since there are estimates and assumptions inherent in recording these insurance liabilities, including the ability to estimate the future development of incurred claims based on historical claims experience and loss reserves, current claim data, and the severity of the claims, differences between actual future events and prior estimates and assumptions could result in adjustments to these liabilities. As of December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, we had $8.0$9.9 million accrued for these insurance claims.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets. We assess the potential impairment of long-lived assets, principally property and equipment, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We determine if there is an impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by our restaurants. If assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment charge is measured by calculating the amount by which the asset's carrying amount exceeds its fair value. In determining future cash flows, significant estimates are made by us with respect to future operating results of each restaurant over its remaining lease term, including sales trends, labor rates, commodity costs and other operating cost assumptions which can be impacted by changes in the business or economic conditions. Our fair value estimates are also subject to a high degree of judgment, including our ability to sell the related assets and changing market conditions. Should actual cash flows and our future estimates vary from those estimates used, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets in the future.
Lease Accounting. Judgments made by management for We adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 842, Leases, as of December 31, 2018, coinciding with the standard’s effective date. We have operating and finance leases related to our restaurants. In accordance with ASC 842, we determine if an arrangement is a lease obligations includeat inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and current and long term operating lease liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. Finance leases are included in property and equipment and other current and long term liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. Lease liabilities are calculated using the lengtheffective interest method and recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the reasonably certain lease term, which includesregardless of classification, while the determinationamortization of renewal options that are reasonably assured. The lease term can affect the classification ofROU assets varies depending upon classification. As our leases generally do not provide an implicit rate, we use a lease as capital or operating for accounting purposes, the term over which related leasehold improvements for each restaurant are amortized, and any rent holidays and/or changes in rental amounts for recognizing rent expense over the term of the lease. These judgments may produce materially different amounts of depreciation, amortization and rent expense than would be reported if different assumed lease terms were used.
We also must evaluate sales of our restaurants which occur in sale-leaseback transactionscollateralized incremental borrowing rate (“IBR”) to determine the proper accounting forpresent value of lease payments. This analysis considers qualitative and quantitative factors. We adjust our selected IBR quarterly with a company-specific yield curve that approximates our market risk profile. The collateralized IBR is also based upon the proceeds of such sales either as a sale or a financing. This evaluation requires certain judgments in determining whether clauses inestimated impact that the lease or any related agreements constitute continuing involvement. For those sale-leasebacks that are accounted for as financing transactions, we must estimate our incremental borrowing rate, or another rate in cases where the incremental borrowing rate is not appropriate to utilize, for purposes of determining interest expense and the resulting amortization of the lease financing obligation. Changes in the determination of the incremental borrowing rates or other rates utilized in connection with the accounting for lease financing transactions could have a significant effectcollateral has on the interest expense and underlying balance of the lease financing obligations.IBR.  
Valuation of Deferred Income Tax Assets. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to the years in which those differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent we believe these assets will more likely than not be realized. realized. In evaluating the realizability of our net deferred tax assets, we perform an assessment of positive and negative evidence, as required by ASC 740. Under ASC 740 the weight given to negative and positive evidence is commensurate only to the extent that such evidence can be objectively verified. ASC 740 also prescribes that objective historical evidence, in particular our three-year cumulative loss position at January 3, 2021, be given a greater weight than subjective evidence, including our forecastsforecast of future taxable income, which include assumptions that cannot be objectively verified. In evaluatingdetermining the objective evidence that historical results provide, we consider three yearslikelihood of cumulative operating income asfuture realization of both December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017. Based on our evaluation of positive evidence in 2016 we reversed the valuation allowance previously established on all of our net deferred income tax assets.assets as of January 3, 2021 and December 29, 2019 we considered both positive and negative evidence and weighted the effect of such evidence based upon its objectivity. Based on the required weight of evidence under ASC 740, as of January 3, 2021 we determined that a valuation allowance was needed for certain income tax credits in the amount of $13.1 million as they may expire prior to their utilization. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be adjusted if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced or increased or if objective negative evidence in the form of cumulative losses is no longer present and additional weight may be given to subjective evidence such as projections for growth. We will continue to monitor and evaluate the positive and negative evidence considered in arriving at the above conclusion, in order to assess whether such conclusion remains appropriate in future periods.
We must also make estimates of certain items that relate to current and deferred tax liabilities. These estimates include employer tax credits for items such as the Work Opportunity Tax Credit, as well as estimates of tax depreciation based on methods anticipated to be used on our tax returns. These estimates are made based on the best available information at the time of the estimate and historical experience.

62



ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to market risk associated with fluctuations in interest rates, primarily limited to revolving credit borrowings under our amended senior credit facility. However, at December 31, 2017, we had noSenior Credit Facilities. At January 3, 2021, there were outstanding borrowings of $493.3 million under our amended senior credit facility.Senior Credit Facilities. A 1% change in interest rates would have resulted in a $0.1$3.3 million change to interest expense for the year ended January 3, 2021 and a $3.2 million change to interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2017.29, 2019.
BorrowingsAt January 3, 2021, borrowings under the senior credit facility bearSenior Credit Facilities bore interest as follows (all terms as defined in our Senior Credit Facilities):
(i) Revolving Credit Facility: at a rate per annum equal to (a) the Alternate Base Rate plus 2.50% or (b) LIBOR Rate plus 3.50%.
(ii) Term Loan B borrowings: at a rate per annum equal to (a) the Alternate Base Rate plus 2.25% or (b) LIBOR Rate plus 3.25%.
(iii) Term Loan B-1 borrowings: at a rate per annum, at our option, based on (all terms as defined in our amended senior credit facility):
(i)of (a) the Alternate Base Rate plus the applicable margin of 1.75% to 2.75% based on our Adjusted Leverage Ratio,5.25% or
(ii) (b) the LIBOR Rate (which shall not be less than 1% for Incremental Term B-1 Loans) plus the applicable margin of 2.75% to 3.75% based on our Adjusted Leverage Ratio.
At December 31, 2017 our Alternate Base Rate margin was 1.75% and our LIBOR Rate margin was 2.75%6.25%.
Commodity Price Risk
We are exposed to market price fluctuations in beef and other food product prices caused by weather, market conditions, including sourcing of various products internationally, and other factors which are not considered predictable or within our control. Given the historical volatility of beef and other food product prices, this exposure can impact our food and beverage costs. Although many of the products purchased are subject to changes in commodity prices, certain purchasing contracts or pricing arrangements have been negotiated in advance to minimize price volatility. Where possible, these types of purchasing techniques to control costs are used as an alternative to using financial instruments to hedge commodity prices. In many cases, we believe we will be able to address commodity cost increases that are significant and appear to be long-term in nature by adjusting our menu pricing. However, long-term increases in commodity prices may result in lower restaurant-level operating margins.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The financial statements and supplementary data of Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. required by this Item are described in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A10-K and are presented beginning on page F-1.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our senior management is responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act), designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
63


well as other key members of our management. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2017.January 3, 2021.


Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. No changes occurred in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 20172020 that materially affected, or isare reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our senior management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act), designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.
Because of inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management has evaluated the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017January 3, 2021 based on the criteria set forth in a report entitled Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, we have concluded that, as of December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and their report is included herein.




64


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc.


Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. and subsidiarysubsidiaries (the "Company"“Company”) as of December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl — Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl — Integrated Framework (2013)issued by COSO.


We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)2 as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021 of the Company and our report dated March 12, 2018,11, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule.statements.


Basis offor Opinion

The Company'sCompany’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting


A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Rochester, New York
March 12, 201811, 2021

65



ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.

66



PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Incorporated by reference from our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

We have adopted a written code of ethics applicable to our directors, officers and employees in accordance with the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market and the SEC. We make our code of ethics available free of charge through our internet website, www.carrols.com. We will disclose on our website amendments to or waivers from our code of ethics in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Incorporated by reference from our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Incorporated by reference from our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Incorporated by reference from our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Incorporated by reference from our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.



67


PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE


(a) (1) Financial Statements - Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. and Subsidiary


(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedule
ScheduleDescriptionPage
ScheduleDescriptionNonePage
II
Schedules other than those listed are omitted for the reason that they are not required, not applicable, or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(a) (3) Exhibits
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
NumberDescription
2.1
3.12.2
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.43.3
3.4
3.5
3.53.6
3.63.7
68


3.8
4.13.9
3.10
3.11
4.1


Exhibit
NumberDescription
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
10.14.9
4.10
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
69


10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11


Exhibit
NumberDescription
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.19
10.20
10.21
10.22
10.23
70


10.24
10.25
10.26


Exhibit
NumberDescription
10.27
10.28
10.29
10.30
10.31
14.110.32
10.33
10.34
10.35
10.36
10.37
10.38
10.39
71


10.40
10.41
10.42
10.43
10.44
10.45
10.46
10.47
10.48
10.49
10.50
10.51
10.52
10.53
10.54
10.55


72


10.56
14.1
21.1
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101.INSXBRL Instance Document
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
#
#    Filed herewith.
Compensatory plan or arrangement

†    Compensatory plan or arrangement

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.

73



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc.:


Opinion on the Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. and subsidiarysubsidiaries (the "Company") as of January 3, 2021 and December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017, and29, 2019, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, and the related notes and consolidated financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)2 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”"financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of January 3, 2021 and December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017,29, 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 12, 2018,11, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting.


Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases in fiscal year 2019 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), as amended, using the option to not restate comparative periods and apply the standard as of the date of initial application.

Basis for Opinion


These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of this critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Rochester, New York
March 12, 2018


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Other Lease Charges – Refer to Notes 1 and 5 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

As disclosed in the consolidated financial statements property and equipment, net were $349.6 million as of January 3, 2021. Impairment is reviewed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable.As discussed in Note 5 to the financial statements, the Company recognized impairment and other lease charges for long-lived assets of $12.8 million during the year ended January 3, 2021.

If an indicator of impairment exists for any restaurant assets, an estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows over the life of the primary asset for each restaurant is compared to that long-lived asset’s carrying value.

The determination of whether an impairment indicator has occurred involves the evaluation of subjective factors by management to assess what constitutes an event or change in circumstance that indicates a restaurant should be tested for recoverability, and therefore auditing the valuation of property and equipment involved especially subjective judgment.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit:

Subjective auditor judgment was required to evaluate the completeness of management’s assessment as to whether an event or change in circumstance indicates a restaurant’s assets should be tested for recoverability. The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:

We tested the effectiveness of controls over management’s long-lived impairment process, including controls related to determining the completeness of management’s assessment as to which events or changes in circumstance indicates a restaurant’s assets should be tested for recoverability, most notably; low operating cash flows, declining sales and if the ratio of trailing twelve months cash flows extended over the remaining lease term does not exceed the net book value of the asset group, which are all utilized to identify a triggering event at the restaurant level.

We evaluated management’s process for determining whether all potential indicators of impairment were appropriately identified, including:
comparing the consistency and precision of the methodology used to determine the proper impairment indicators by management to the relevant requirements of generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”);
considering current industry events, Company specific events, macroeconomic conditions through review of relevant industry publications, current news publications, analyst reports and Board of Directors’ meeting minutes, in order to evaluate the completeness of events or changes in circumstances identified by management as indicators that the restaurant’s asset should be tested for recoverability;
assessing the completeness of the impairment indicators identified by the Company by reviewing historical performance of previously impaired restaurants before an impairment charge was recorded, and comparing such restaurants that exhibited such triggers to the restaurants identified by management for the current year impairment indicator test;
for restaurants that are nearing the expiration of their original-lease end date, comparing the trailing twelve months cash flows extended over the remaining lease term to net book value of the asset group.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Rochester, New York
March 11, 2021

We have served as the Company’sCompany's auditor since 2005.

F- 2






CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF JANUARY 3, 2021 AND DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND JANUARY 1, 201729, 2019
(In thousands, of dollars, except share and per share amounts)
January 3, 2021December 29, 2019
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$64,964 $2,974 
Trade and other receivables19,862 13,445 
Inventories11,595 13,334 
Prepaid rent8,046 1,986 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets7,309 7,762 
Refundable income taxes169 284 
Total current assets111,945 39,785 
Property and equipment, net (Note 3)349,555 385,578 
Franchise rights, net (Note 4)334,597 348,941 
Goodwill (Note 4)122,619 122,619 
Franchise agreements, at cost less accumulated amortization of $14,653 and $13,365, respectively31,584 32,690 
Operating right-of-use assets, net (Note 7)799,962 811,016 
Other assets6,823 10,831 
Total assets$1,757,085 $1,751,460 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt and finance lease liabilities (Note 8)$5,525 $5,866 
Current portion of operating lease liabilities (Note 7)41,815 40,805 
Accounts payable27,596 45,780 
Accrued interest656 901 
Accrued payroll, related taxes and benefits49,417 31,314 
Accrued real estate taxes7,774 8,139 
Other current liabilities23,558 16,520 
Total current liabilities156,341 149,325 
Long-term debt and finance lease liabilities, net of current portion (Note 8)475,695 455,565 
Lease financing obligations1,191 1,194 
Operating lease liabilities (Note 7)809,969 808,292 
Deferred income taxes, net (Note 10)11,362 6,983 
Accrued postretirement benefits1,523 2,555 
Other liabilities (Note 6)29,472 18,084 
Total liabilities1,485,553 1,441,998 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)00
Stockholders’ equity (Note 12):
Preferred stock, par value $.01; authorized 20,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding—100 shares
Voting common stock, par value $.01; authorized—100,000,000 shares, issued—52,653,964 and 51,840,200 shares, respectively, and outstanding—49,389,382 and 50,496,265 shares, respectively515 510 
Additional paid-in capital306,469 301,251 
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)(18,367)11,096 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(3,015)622 
Treasury stock, at cost(14,070)(4,017)
Total stockholders’ equity271,532 309,462 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$1,757,085 $1,751,460 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F- 3
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
ASSETS   
Current assets:   
Cash$29,412

$2,002
Trade and other receivables9,420
 7,623
Inventories9,373
 7,761
Prepaid rent5,134
 4,665
Prepaid expenses and other current assets6,622
 7,465
Refundable income taxes54
 153
Total current assets60,015
 29,669
Property and equipment, net (Note 3)274,098
 247,847
Franchise rights, net (Note 4)152,028
 134,153
Goodwill (Note 4)36,792
 22,869
Franchise agreements, at cost less accumulated amortization of $11,028 and $9,734, respectively23,192
 19,591
Favorable leases, net (Note 4)5,862
 5,441
Deferred income taxes (Note 10)27,647
 28,841
Other assets1,880
 1,744
Total assets$581,514
 $490,155
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   
Current liabilities:   
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 8)$1,808
 $1,616
Accounts payable29,245
 22,445
Accrued interest3,672
 2,676
Accrued payroll, related taxes and benefits26,635
 26,029
Accrued real estate taxes5,269
 5,202
Other liabilities12,900
 10,932
Total current liabilities79,529
 68,900
Long-term debt, net of current portion and deferred financing costs (Note 8)278,519
 215,108
Lease financing obligations1,196
 2,938
Deferred income—sale-leaseback of real estate (Note 7)11,451
 12,271
Accrued postretirement benefits (Note 17)4,838
 4,566
Unfavorable leases, net (Note 4)13,111
 11,686
Other liabilities (Note 6)23,810
 20,030
Total liabilities412,454
 335,499
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
 
Stockholders’ equity (Note 12):   
Preferred stock, par value $.01; authorized 20,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding—100 shares
 
Voting common stock, par value $.01; authorized—100,000,000 shares, issued—36,158,711 and 35,835,800 shares, respectively, and outstanding—35,436,252, and 35,258,579 shares, respectively354
 353
Additional paid-in capital144,650
 141,133
Retained earnings25,407
 14,514
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (Note 17)(1,210) (1,203)
Treasury stock, at cost(141) (141)
Total stockholders’ equity169,060
 154,656
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$581,514
 $490,155

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 20162021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(In thousands, of dollars, except share and per share amounts)

January 3, 2021December 29, 2019December 30, 2018
Revenue:
Restaurant sales$1,547,502 $1,452,516 $1,179,307 
Other revenue10,249 
Total revenue1,547,502 1,462,765 1,179,307 
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales452,738 431,969 326,308 
Restaurant wages and related expenses498,127 485,278 382,829 
Restaurant rent expense (Note 7)118,444 107,147 81,409 
Other restaurant operating expenses236,059 227,364 178,750 
Advertising expense60,735 58,689 48,340 
General and administrative (including stock-based compensation expense of $5,223, $5,753 and $5,812, respectively)84,051 84,734 66,587 
Depreciation and amortization81,727 74,674 58,468 
Impairment and other lease charges (Note 5)12,778 3,564 3,685 
Other income (Note 9)(1,271)(1,911)(424)
Total operating expenses1,543,388 1,471,508 1,145,952 
Income (loss) from operations4,114 (8,743)33,355 
Interest expense27,283 27,856 23,638 
Gain on bargain purchase (Note 2)(230)
Loss on extinguishment of debt (Note 8)7,443 
Income (loss) before income taxes(23,169)(44,042)9,947 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes (Note 10)6,294 (12,123)(157)
Net income (loss)$(29,463)$(31,919)$10,104 
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (Note 13)$(0.58)$(0.74)$0.22 
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic50,751,185 43,421,715 35,715,372 
Diluted50,751,185 43,421,715 45,319,971 
Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Net income (loss)$(29,463)$(31,919)$10,104 
Other comprehensive income (loss)(5,284)1,268 564 
Comprehensive income (loss)$(34,747)$(30,651)$10,668 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F- 4
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
Restaurant sales$1,088,532
 $943,583
 $859,004
Costs and expenses:     
Cost of sales304,593
 250,112
 240,322
Restaurant wages and related expenses350,054
 297,766
 267,950
Restaurant rent expense (Note 7)75,948
 64,814
 58,096
Other restaurant operating expenses166,786
 148,946
 135,874
Advertising expense44,677
 41,299
 32,242
General and administrative (including stock-based compensation expense of $3,518, $2,053, and $1,438, respectively)60,348
 54,956
 50,515
Depreciation and amortization54,159
 47,295
 39,845
Impairment and other lease charges (Note 5)2,827
 2,355
 3,078
Other expense (income) (Notes 9 and 14)(333) 338
 (126)
Total operating expenses1,059,059
 907,881
 827,796
Income from operations29,473
 35,702
 31,208
Interest expense21,710
 18,315
 18,569
Loss on extinguishment of debt (Note 8)
 
 12,635
Income before income taxes7,763
 17,387
 4
Provision (benefit) for income taxes (Note 10)604
 (28,085) 
Net income$7,159
 $45,472
 $4
Basic and diluted net income per share (Note 13):$0.16
 $1.01
 $0.00
Shares used in computing net income per share:     
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding35,416,531
 35,178,329
 34,958,847
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding44,976,514
 44,851,345
 44,623,251
Comprehensive income, net of tax:     
Net income$7,159
 $45,472
 $4
Other comprehensive income (loss)(7) (868) 22
Comprehensive income$7,152
 $44,604
 $26

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 20162021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(In thousands, of dollars, except share and per share amounts)

Accumulated
AdditionalRetainedOtherTotal
Common StockPreferred StockPaid-InEarningsComprehensiveTreasury StockStockholders'
SharesAmountSharesAmountCapital(Deficit)Income (Loss)SharesAmountEquity
Balance at December 31, 201735,436,252 $354 100 $— $144,650 $25,407 $(1,210)— $(141)$169,060 
Stock-based compensation— — — — 5,812 — — — — 5,812 
Vesting of non-vested shares and excess tax benefits306,175 — — (3)— — — — 
Net income— — — — — 10,104 — — — 10,104 
Change in postretirement benefit obligations, net of income tax of $186— — — — — — 564 — — 564 
Balance at December 30, 201835,742,427 $357 100 $— $150,459 $35,511 $(646)$(141)$185,540 
Stock-based compensation— — — — 5,753 — — — — 5,753 
Vesting of non-vested shares492,135 — — (4)— — — — 
Issuance of common and preferred stock7,364,413 74 10,000 — 145,259 — — — — 145,333 
Purchase of treasury stock— — — — — — — 553,112 (4,017)(4,017)
Retirement of treasury stock— — — — (141)— — — 141 
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock7,450,402 75 (10,000)— (75)— — — — 
Net loss— — — — — (31,919)— — — (31,919)
Adoption of ASC 842, net of taxes (Note 1)— — — — — 7,504 — — — 7,504 
Change in postretirement benefit obligations, net of income tax of $420— — — — — — 1,268 — — 1,268 
Balance at December 29, 201951,049,377 $510 100 $— $301,251 $11,096 $622 553,112 $(4,017)$309,462 
Stock-based compensation— — — — 5,223 — — — — 5,223 
Vesting of non-vested shares436,739 — — (5)— — — — 
Purchase of treasury stock— — — — — — — 1,543,622 (10,053)(10,053)
Net loss— — — — — (29,463)— — — (29,463)
Change in valuation of interest rate swap, net of income tax of $1,841 (Note 8)— — — — — — (4,221)— — (4,221)
Change in postretirement benefit obligation, net of income tax of $194— — — — — — 584 — — 584 
Balance at January 3, 202151,486,116 $515 100 $— $306,469 $(18,367)$(3,015)2,096,734 $(14,070)$271,532 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F- 5
         Retained Accumulated    
       Additional Earnings Other   Total
 Common Stock Preferred Paid-In (Accumulated Comprehensive Treasury Stockholders'
 Shares Amount Stock Capital Deficit) Income (Loss) Stock Equity
Balance at December 28, 201434,827,240
 $348
 $
 $137,647
 $(30,962) $(357) $(141) $106,535
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 1,438
 
 
 
 1,438
Vesting of non-vested shares and excess tax benefits212,650
 2
 
 (2) 
 
 
 
Net income
 
 
 
 4
 
 
 4
Change in postretirement benefit obligations (Note 17)
 
 
 
 
 22
 
 22
Balance at January 3, 201635,039,890
 350
 
 139,083
 (30,958) (335) (141) 107,999
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 2,053
 
 
 
 2,053
Vesting of non-vested shares and excess tax benefits218,689
 3
 
 (3) 
 
 
 
Net income
 
 
 
 45,472
 
 
 45,472
Change in postretirement benefit obligations, net of tax benefit of $541 (Note 17)
 
 
 
 
 (868) 
 (868)
Balance at January 1, 201735,258,579
 353
 
 141,133
 14,514
 (1,203) (141) 154,656
Cumulative-effect adjustment from adoption of ASU 2016-09
 
 
 
 3,734
 
 
 3,734
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 3,518
 
 
 
 3,518
Vesting of non-vested shares and excess tax benefits177,673
 1
 
 (1) 
 
 
 
Net income
 
 
 
 7,159
 
 
 7,159
Change in postretirement benefit obligations, net of tax benefit of $4 (Note 17)
 
 
 
 
 (7) 
 (7)
Balance at December 31, 201735,436,252
 $354
 $
 $144,650
 $25,407
 $(1,210) $(141) $169,060

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 20162021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(In thousands of dollars)thousands)

January 3, 2021December 29, 2019December 30, 2018
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)$(29,463)$(31,919)$10,104 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Loss (gain) on disposals of property and equipment(994)(74)312 
Stock-based compensation5,223 5,753 5,812 
Gain on bargain purchase (Note 2)(230)
Impairment and other lease charges12,778 3,564 3,685 
Depreciation and amortization81,727 74,674 58,468 
Amortization of deferred financing costs2,170 1,694 1,202 
Amortization of bond premium and discount on debt539 (80)(913)
Amortization of deferred gains from sale-leaseback transactions(1,584)
Deferred income taxes6,026 (11,982)(483)
Non-cash loss on extinguishment of debt129 
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:
Refundable income taxes115 (284)55 
Trade and other receivables(6,417)(523)(2,275)
Accounts payable(5,927)1,196 (926)
Accrued interest(245)(2,917)146 
Accrued payroll, related taxes and benefits18,103 (538)2,084 
Other liabilities10,993 238 3,998 
Change in operating right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities, net10,906 3,980 
Other(1,589)5,797 1,314 
Net cash provided by operating activities103,945 48,708 80,769 
Cash flows used for investing activities:
Capital expenditures:
New restaurant development(17,824)(53,596)(23,171)
Restaurant remodeling(15,317)(50,383)(31,951)
Other restaurant capital expenditures(13,064)(18,922)(15,726)
Corporate and restaurant information systems(10,685)(11,978)(4,887)
Total capital expenditures(56,890)(134,879)(75,735)
Acquisition of restaurants, net of cash acquired (Note 2)(130,646)(38,102)
Proceeds from insurance recoveries2,071 323 642 
Properties purchased for sale-leaseback(15,537)(1,207)(2,123)
Proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions22,499 48,364 8,424 
Net cash used for investing activities(47,857)(218,045)(106,894)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of Term Loan B and B-1 Facilities71,250 422,875 
Repayments of Term Loan B and B-1 Facilities(4,625)(2,125)
Retirement of 8% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes(280,500)
Borrowings under prior revolving credit facility17,000 
Repayments under prior revolving credit facility(17,000)
Borrowings under revolving credit facility150,000 436,000 
Repayments under revolving credit facility(195,750)(390,250)
Payments on finance lease liabilities(1,617)(2,170)(1,811)
Proceeds from lease financing obligations2,692 
January 3, 2021December 29, 2019December 30, 2018
Costs associated with financing long-term debt(3,303)(11,516)(154)
Purchase of treasury shares(10,053)(4,017)
Net cash provided by financing activities5,902 168,297 727 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents61,990 (1,040)(25,398)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period2,974 4,014 29,412 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$64,964 $2,974 $4,014 
Supplemental disclosures:
Interest paid on long-term debt$24,714 $29,055 $23,098 
Interest paid on lease financing obligations$104 $104 $105 
Accruals for capital expenditures$1,241 $15,062 $7,605 
Common stock issued for consideration in acquisition$$145,333 $
Non-cash reduction of lease financing obligations$$$2,538 
Income taxes paid (refunded), net$153 $144 $(270)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F- 6
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
Cash flows provided from operating activities:     
Net income$7,159
 $45,472
 $4
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided from operating activities:     
Loss (gain) on disposals of property and equipment521
 (549) 364
Stock-based compensation3,518
 2,053
 1,438
Impairment and other lease charges2,827
 2,355
 3,078
Depreciation and amortization54,159
 47,295
 39,845
Amortization of deferred financing costs1,035
 791
 874
Amortization of bond premium(459) 
 
Amortization of deferred gains from sale-leaseback transactions(1,626) (1,788) (2,535)
Deferred income taxes574
 (28,085) 
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 12,635
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:     
Refundable income taxes99
 (153) 2,416
Trade and other receivables(1,310) (1,462) (2,127)
Accounts payable3,084
 1,686
 2,054
Accrued interest996
 4
 502
Accrued payroll, related taxes and benefits336
 (1,553) 10,261
Other1,870
 (3,778) 1,893
Net cash provided from operating activities72,783
 62,288
 70,702
Cash flows used for investing activities:     
Capital expenditures:     
New restaurant development(14,759) (8,228) (574)
Restaurant remodeling(33,504) (65,767) (41,582)
Other restaurant capital expenditures(18,926) (15,168) (10,772)
Corporate and restaurant information systems(6,327) (4,936) (3,920)
Total capital expenditures(73,516) (94,099) (56,848)
Acquisition of restaurants, net of cash acquired (Note 2)(37,923) (48,088) (52,750)
Proceeds from insurance recoveries481
 1,413
 
Proceeds from sales of other assets
 
 534
Properties purchased for sale-leaseback(1,404) (9,046) (3,513)
Proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions4,257
 53,599
 9,148
Net cash used for investing activities(108,105) (96,221) (103,429)
Cash flows provided from financing activities:     
Proceeds from issuance of 8% senior secured second lien notes79,875
 
 200,000
Redemption of 11.25% senior secured second lien notes
 
 (159,771)
Borrowings under senior credit facility183,250
 129,000
 
Repayments under senior credit facility(196,750) (115,500) 
Principal payments on capital leases(1,651) (1,480) (1,280)
Proceeds from lease financing obligations
 1,816
 
Financing costs associated with issuance of debt and lease financing obligations(1,992) (175) (5,169)
Net cash provided from financing activities62,732
 13,661
 33,780
Net increase (decrease) in cash27,410
 (20,272) 1,053
Cash, beginning of period2,002
 22,274
 21,221
Cash, end of period$29,412
 $2,002
 $22,274
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
Supplemental disclosures:     
Interest paid on long-term debt$20,885
 $17,415
 $17,088
Interest paid on lease financing obligations$119
 $105
 $104
Accruals for capital expenditures$6,839
 $4,032
 $3,779
Non-cash reduction of lease financing obligations$1,744
 $
 $
Income taxes paid (refunded), net$(63) $153
 $(2,416)
Capital lease obligations acquired or incurred$316
 $583
 $615


CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 20162021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(InTabular amounts in thousands, of dollars except share and per share amounts)





1. Basis of Presentation
Business Description. At December 31, 2017January 3, 2021 Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. ("Carrols Restaurant Group") operated, as franchisee, 8071,009 Burger King® restaurants under the trade name “Burger King®” in 1723 Northeastern, Midwestern and Southeastern states and 65 Popeyes® restaurants in 7 Southeastern states.
In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak to be a global pandemic, which continues to spread throughout the United States. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the communities the Company's restaurants operate in as federal, state and local governments have taken a series of actions to contain its spread. In March 2020, the Company closed its dining rooms in all restaurants and modified operating hours in line with local ordinances and day-part sales trends, and over the course of March and April of 2020, temporarily closed 46 restaurants that were geographically close to one of its other restaurants. Given sales improvements after the initial months of the pandemic, 44 of the temporarily closed restaurants had reopened by the end of 2020. Two of the restaurants temporarily closed in March were permanently closed in 2020.
Each restaurant operated according to their respective local governmental guidelines as well as safety procedures developed by Burger King and Popeyes. As individual states and local governments have allowed reopenings, the Company has evaluated opportunities to re-open dining rooms. Approximately 35% of dining rooms had reopened by the end of 2020, however, eat-in sales represented only approximately 1% of our total restaurant sales as guests continue to rely on our drive-thru, carry-out and delivery service modes.
Basis of Consolidation.Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. is a holding company and conducts all of its operations through its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiary,subsidiaries Carrols Corporation (“Carrols”and New CFH, LLC and their wholly-owned subsidiaries. Carrols Corporation's material direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, "Carrols") and Carrols'include its wholly-owned subsidiary Carrols LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Carrols LLC's wholly-owned subsidiary Republic Foods, Inc., a Maryland corporation ("Republic Foods"). The consolidated financial statements presented hereinNew CFH LLC's material direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries include the accounts of Carrols Restaurant GroupFrayser Quality, LLC and its wholly-owned subsidiary Carrols.
Nashville Quality, LLC (and together with New CFH, LLC's immaterial direct and indirect subsidiaries, collectively, "New CFH"). Unless the context otherwise requires, Carrols Restaurant Group Carrols and Carrols LLCits direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “Company.” All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Fiscal Year. The Company uses a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Sunday closest to December 31. The fiscal yearsyear ended December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017 each3, 2021 contained 5253 weeks and the fiscal yearyears ended January 3, 2016December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018 each contained 5352 weeks.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Significant items subject to such estimates include: accrued occupancy costs,other lease charges related to closed locations, insurance liabilities, evaluation for impairment of long-lived assets and franchise rights, lease accounting matters, the valuation of acquired assets and liabilities, valuation of interest rate swap and the valuation of deferred income tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. At both January 3, 2021 and December 31, 2017,29, 2019, the Company had $27.6 milliondid not have any cash invested in money market funds.funds which are classified as cash equivalents on the consolidated balance sheets.
F- 7

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Inventories. Inventories, consisting primarily consisting of food, beverages, and paper supplies, are stated at the lower of cost determined on the first-in, first-out method or market.net realizable value. Net realizable value is determined as the estimated selling price in the normal course of business minus the cost of disposal and transportation.
Property and Equipment. Property and equipment is recorded at cost. The Company capitalizes all direct costs incurred to develop, construct and substantially improve its restaurants. These costs are depreciated and charged to expense based upon their property classification when placed in service. Property and equipment is recorded at cost. RepairRepairs and maintenance activitiesexpenditures are expensed as incurred.
Depreciation and amortization is provided using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
Owned buildings9to30 years
Equipment3to7 years
Computer hardware and software3to7 years
Assets subject to capitalfinance leasesShorter of useful life or lease term
Building costs incurred for new restaurants on leased land are amortized over the lease term, which is generally a period of twenty years. Leasehold improvements are depreciatedamortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the underlying expected lease term. InThe Company includes renewal option periods when determining the expected lease term in circumstances where an economic penalty would be presumed by the non-exercise of one or more renewal options under the lease the Company includes those renewal option periods when determining the lease term. For significant leasehold improvements made during the latter part of the lease term, the Company amortizes those improvements over the shorter of their useful life or the expected lease term. The expected lease term would consider the exercise of renewal options if the value of the improvements would imply thatresult in an economic penalty would bepenalty.
CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 2016
(In thousands of dollars except share and per share amounts)


incurred without the renewal of the option. Building costs incurred for new restaurants on leased land are depreciated over the lease term, which is generally a period of twenty years.
Business Combinations. In accordance with ASC 805, the Company allocates the purchase price of an acquired business to its identifiable assets and liabilities based on the estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the amount allocated to the assets and liabilities, if any, is recorded as goodwill. The excess value of the net identifiable assets and liabilities acquired over the purchase price, if any, is recorded as a bargain purchase gain. The Company uses all available information to estimate fair values of identifiable intangible assets and property acquired. In making these determinations, the Company may engage an independent third party valuation specialist to assist with the valuation of certain leasehold improvements, franchise rights and favorable and unfavorable leases.
The Company estimates that the seller's carrying value of acquired restaurant equipment, subject to certain adjustments, and restaurant equipment subject to capital leases is equivalent to fair value of this equipment at the date of the acquisitions.acquisition. The fair values of assumed franchise agreements are valued as if the remaining term of the agreement is at the market rate. The fair values of acquired land, buildings, and certain leasehold improvements, and restaurant equipment subject to finance leases are determined using both the cost approach and market approach. The fair value of the favorable and unfavorable leases acquired, as well as the fair value of land, buildings and leasehold improvements acquired, is measuredapproach using significant inputs observable in the open market. The Company categorizes all suchthese inputs as Level 2 inputs under ASC 820. The fair value of acquired franchise rights is primarilyand favorable or unfavorable lease positions are determined using the income approach and includes unobservable inputs. The Company categorizes these inputs classified as Level 3 inputs under ASC 820.
On May 30, 2012, theFranchise Rights. The Company acquired 278 Burger King restaurants from Burger King Corporation ("BKC"), including BKC's assignment of its right of first refusal on franchise restaurant transfers in 20 states as follows: Connecticut (except Hartford county), Delaware, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts (except for Middlesex, Norfolk and Suffolk counties), Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York (except for Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Queens, Richmond, Suffolk and Westchester counties), North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Vermont, Virginia, Washington DC and West Virginia, (the "ROFR") pursuant to an operating agreement with BKC dated May 30, 2012, and as amended on January 26, 2015 and December 17, 2015.
Franchise Rights. For its restaurant acquisitions prior to 2002, the Company generally allocated to franchise rights, an intangible asset, the excess of purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. For acquisitions subsequent to 2002, the Company determineddetermines the fair value of franchise rights based upon the acquired restaurants' future earnings, discounting those earnings using an appropriate market discount rate and subtracting a contributory charge for net working capital, property and equipment and assembled workforce to determine the fair value attributable to these franchise rights. Amounts allocated to franchise rights for each acquisition are amortized using the straight-line method over the average remaining term of the acquired franchise agreements plus one twenty-yeartwenty-year renewal period.
Franchise Agreements. Fees for initial franchises and renewals are amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the agreement, which is generally twenty years.
F- 8

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the value assigned to the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of the businesses acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment at least annually as of the fiscal year end.
Favorable and Unfavorable Leases. Favorable and unfavorableleases are due to the terms of acquired operating lease contracts being favorable or unfavorable relative to market terms of comparable leases on the acquisition date. Favorable and unfavorable leases are amortized as a component of rent expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining lease terms at the time of the acquisition.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. The Company assesses the recoverabilitypotential impairment of property and equipment, franchise rights and other definite-lived intangible assets by determining whether the carrying value of these assets can be recovered over their respective remaining useful lives through undiscounted future operating cash flows. Impairment is reviewed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable. Impairment indicators at the restaurant level include low operating cash flows, declining sales and if the ratio of trailing twelve months cash flows extended over the remaining lease term does not exceed the net book value of the asset group.
CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 2016
(In thousands of dollars except share and per share amounts)


Deferred Financing Costs. Financing costs incurred in obtaining long-term debt and lease financing obligations are capitalized and amortized over the life of the related obligation as interest expense using the effective interest method. Long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheetsheets is presented net of the unamortized amount of the financing costs related to long-term borrowings.
Leases. All The Company utilizes land and buildings in its operations under various lease agreements. The Company does not consider any one of these individual leases material to the Company's operations. Initial lease terms are reviewedgenerally for capital or operating classificationtwenty years and provide for renewal options with rent escalations. The exercise of such renewal options are generally at their inception.the Company’s sole discretion. The majorityCompany evaluates renewal options at lease commencement to determine if such options are reasonably certain to be exercised based on economic factors. Certain leases also require contingent rent, determined as a percentage of sales as defined by the terms of the applicable lease agreement. For most locations, the Company is obligated for occupancy related costs including payment of property taxes, insurance and utilities.
Right-of-use (“ROU”) lease assets represent the Company’s leases are operating leases. Many ofright to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make payments in exchange for that right of use. As the rate implicit within our leases is not readily determinable, the Company uses market and term specific incremental borrowing rates which consider the rate of interest it expects to pay on a collateralized basis to borrow an amount equal to the lease payments under similar terms. ROU assets are also reduced by lease incentives, initial direct costs and adjusted by favorable lease assets and unfavorable lease liabilities.
Variable lease components represent amounts that are contractually fixed as a percentage of sales and are recognized in expense as incurred. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the consolidated balance sheet and are recognized as lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company does not account for lease components (e.g., fixed payments including rent, real estate taxes and insurance costs) separately from the non-lease components.
The Company also utilizes certain restaurant equipment under various finance lease agreements containwith initial terms of generally eight years. The Company does not consider any one of these individual leases material to the Company's operations.
For certain leases where rent holidays, rent escalation clauses and/or contingent rent provisions. Rentescalates based upon a change in a financial index, such as the Consumer Price Index, the difference between the rate at lease inception and the subsequent fluctuations in that rate are included in variable lease costs. Additionally, because the Company has elected to not separate lease and non-lease components, in limited instances variable costs also include payments to the landlord for common area maintenance, real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses. Lease expense for leases that contain scheduled rent increases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, including any option periods includedwith variable lease payments recognized in the determination of the lease term. Contingent rentalsperiod those payments are generally based upon a percentage of sales or a percentage of sales in excess of stipulated amounts and are generally not considered minimum rent payments but are recognized as rent expense when incurred.
Lease Financing Obligations. Lease financing obligations pertain to real estate sale-leaseback transactions accounted for under the financing method. The assets (landland and building)building assets subject to these obligations remain on the Company’s consolidated balance sheetsheets at their historical costs and suchthe building assets (excluding land) continue to be depreciated
F- 9

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
over their remaining useful lives. The proceeds received by the Company from these transactions are recorded as lease financing obligations and the lease payments are applied as payments of principal and interest. The selection of the interest rate on lease financing obligations is evaluated at inception of the lease based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rate adjusted to the rate required to prevent recognition of a non-cash loss or negative amortization of the obligation through the end of the primary lease term.
Revenue Recognition. Revenues from Company restaurants and other revenue from convenience store sales, net of sales discounts, are recognized when payment is tendered at the time of sale or upon fulfillment of delivery orders. Revenues are reported net of sales tax collected from customers and remitted to governmental taxing authorities.
Gift cards. The Company sells gift cards in its restaurants that are issued under the gift card program of Restaurant Brands International, Inc. ("RBI"). Proceeds from the sale of Burger King® and Popeyes® gift cards at the Company’s restaurants are remitted to RBI, and RBI reimburses the Company for any gift card redemptions at its restaurants. The Company recognizes revenue for restaurant sales upon redemption of gift cards by the customer.
Cost of Sales. The Company includes food, beverage and paper costs and delivery charges, net of any vendor purchase discounts and excluding sales tax collected.rebates, in cost of sales.
Income Taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basesbasis of assets and liabilities as measured by the tax rates that are anticipated to be in effect when those differences reverse. The deferred tax provision generally represents the net change in deferred tax assets and liabilities during the period including any changes in valuation allowances. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established when it is necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is likely. The Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company and its subsidiarysubsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return.
Advertising Costs. All advertising costs are expensed as incurred. For the years ended January 3, 2021, December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018, advertising costs were $60.7 million, $58.7 million and $48.3 million, respectively.
Cost of Sales. The Company includes the cost of food, beverage and paper, net of any vendor discounts and rebates, in cost of sales.
Pre-opening Costs. The Company’s pre-opening costs are expensed as incurred and generally include payroll costs and travel associated with the opening of a new restaurant, rent and promotional costs. For the years ended January 3, 2021, December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018, pre-opening costs were $0.2 million, $1.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively. These costs are expensed as incurred prior to a restaurant opening and are included in other restaurant operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
Insurance. The Company is self-insured for workers’ compensation, general liability, and medical insurance and most workers’ compensation claims under policies where it pays all claims, subject to stop-loss limitations both for individual claims and in certain cases claims in the aggregate. Losses are accrued based upon the Company’s estimates of the aggregate liability for claims based on Company experience and other methods used to measure such estimates. The Company does not discount any of its self-insurance obligations.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments.Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. In determining fair value, the accounting standards establish a three level hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 inputs are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities;
CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 2016
(In thousands of dollars except share and per share amounts)


and Level 3 inputs are unobservable and reflect ourthe Company's own assumptions. Financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, trade and other receivables, accounts payable and long-term debt. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade and other receivables and accounts payable
F- 10

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these financial instruments. The carrying amount of the Term Loan B and Incremental Term B-1 Loan borrowings at January 3, 2021 approximate fair value because of thetheir variable rates. The Carrols Restaurant Group 8.0% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2022 is based on a recent trading value, which is considered Level 2, and at(the "8% Notes") were redeemed in full as of December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017 was approximately $290.5 million and $216.5 million, respectively.29, 2019.
Fair value measurements of non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities are primarily used in the impairment analysis of long-lived assets, goodwill and intangible assets. Long-lived assets and definite-lived intangible assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis using Level 3 inputs. As described in Note 5, the Company recorded long-lived asset impairment charges of $8.2 million, $1.7 million $1.0 million and $1.5$2.7 million during the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016,2021, December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation. The Company has an incentive stock plan under which incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock units (RSU) and non-vested shares may be granted to employees and non-employee directors. On an annual basis, theThe Company has granted non-vested shares under this plan.plan annually as well as granted non-vested shares, stock options, and RSU's to corporate employees for performance. Non-vested shares, options, and RSUs granted to corporate employees generally vest on a straight-line basis over three or four years and non-vested shares granted to non-employee directors generally vest on a straight-line basis over three to five years.
For non-vested stock awards, the fair market value of the award, determined based upon the closing value of the Company’s stock price on the grant date, is recorded to compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. For stock options, the fair-value of the options is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on assumptions for the risk-free rate of interest, expected dividend yield, expected volatility, and the expected term of the award. Compensation expense is recognized over the three-year vesting period. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
Gift cards. The Company sells gift cards in its restaurants that are issued under BKC's gift card program. Proceeds from the sale of Burger King gift cards at the Company’s restaurants are received by BKC. The Company recognizes revenue from gift cards upon redemption by the customer.
Concentrations of Credit Risk. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The Company maintains its day-to-day operating cash balances in interest-bearing transaction accounts at financial institutions, which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. Although the Company maintains balances that exceed the federally insured limit, it has not experienced any losses related to these balances and believes its credit risk to be minimal.
Segment Information. Operating segments are components of an entity for which separate financial information is available and is regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in order to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company's chief operating decision maker currently evaluates the Company's operations from a number of different operational perspectives; however resource allocation decisions are made determined based on the chief operating decision maker's evaluation of the total Company operations. The Company derives all significant revenues from a single operating segment. Accordingly, the Company views the operating results of its Burger King restaurants as one1 reportable segment.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted. In January 2017,March 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update (“FASB”ASU”) 2020-04 (“ASU 2020-04”), Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. ASU 2020-04 provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying U.S. GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by the discontinuation of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). This ASU is effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. The Company is currently evaluating the effect adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740) ("ASU No. 2019-12"). This ASU simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions, including an exception to the general methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period when the year-to-date loss exceeds the anticipated loss for the full year. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted and amendments applied on a prospective basis. The impact of the standard
F- 11

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
will depend on interim and anticipated profit or loss in a given period, however the Company does not expect ASU No. 2019-12 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Adopted. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, to introduce new guidance for the accounting for credit losses on instruments within its scope. ASU 2016-13 requires among other things, the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable supportable forecasts. In addition, ASU 2016-13 amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. This update was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company implemented this for the year beginning December 30, 2019 and the implementation had no impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. This ASU simplifies the accounting for goodwill by eliminating step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under the new ASU, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss will be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds its fair value. This update iswas effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company believes thatimplemented this pronouncement will havefor the year ended January 3, 2021 and the implementation had no impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In August 2016,2018, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows2018-14, Compensation - Retirement benefits (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.715-20). This ASU addresses the classification ofamends ASC 715 to add certain cash receiptsrelevant disclosures, remove certain disclosures no longer considered to be cost beneficial, and payments in the statement of cash flows in orderclarify specific disclosure requirements related to eliminate diversity in practice.defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. This updateASU is effective for fiscal years beginningending after December 15, 2020 and requires application on a retrospective basis. The Company implemented this for the year ended January 3, 2021 and there was no impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2020, the FASB staff issued interpretive guidance that indicated it would be acceptable for entities to make an election to account for lease concessions related to the COVID-19 pandemic consistent with how those concessions would be accounted for under ACS Topic 842, Leases ("ASC 842"), as though enforceable rights and obligations for those concessions existed (regardless of whether those enforceable rights and obligations for the concessions explicitly exist in the contract). Consequently, for concessions related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, an entity will not have to analyze each contract to determine whether enforceable rights and obligations for concessions exist in the contract and can elect to apply or not apply the lease modification guidance in Topic 842 to those contracts. This election is available for concessions related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic that do not result in a substantial increase in the rights of the lessor or the obligations of the lessee. The Company has made the policy election to apply this interpretive guidance to certain rent relief resulting directly from COVID-19, and has assumed that enforceable rights and obligations for those concessions exist in the lease contract. Accordingly, the Company recognized abatements that did not result in an extension of lease term as reductions in variable lease payments, and deferrals that did not result in an extension of lease term as an increase in other current liabilities. This election will continue while these abatements or deferrals are in effect.
F- 12

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 20162021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(InTabular amounts in thousands, of dollars except share and per share amounts)


after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the potential impact that adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. This ASU is intended to improve the reporting of leasing transactions to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information. This ASU will require organizations that lease assets to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, using a modified retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the potential impact that adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements, but expects it will have a material impact on its consolidated balance sheet as it will record the right to use assets and obligations for existing operating leases.
In May 2014, the FASB issued amended guidance for revenue recognition. The new guidance outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. Additionally, the guidance requires improved disclosure to help users of financial statements better understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue that is recognized. The new guidance supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance and will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The Company has substantially completed its evaluation of the impact of revenue recognition guidance on its consolidated financial results and concluded that the new guidance will not impact its recognition of revenue from Company-operated restaurant sales and will have no impact on the manner in which the Company recognizes revenue as the Company’s advertising fund and gift card program are run by its franchisor.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Adopted. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies certain elements of accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, the classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted this ASU in the first quarter of 2017. Upon adoption of this ASU, the Company elected to change its accounting policy and account for forfeitures when they occur. The Company recorded a $3.7 million cumulative-effect adjustment to increase deferred tax assets and retained earnings as a result of the recognition of excess tax benefits previously unrealized. Prior periods have not been adjusted for the adoption of this ASU.
Subsequent Events. The Company reviewed and evaluated subsequent events through the issuance date of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. 
2. Acquisitions
20172019 Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2017,29, 2019, the Company acquired a total of 64 234restaurants from other franchisees, which are referred to as the "2017"2019 acquired restaurants", in the following transactions:
Closing DateNumber of RestaurantsPurchase Price
April 30, 2019(1)220 $259,083 Southeastern states, primarily TN, MS, LA
June 11, 201913 15,788 Baltimore, Maryland
August 20, 2019(2)1,108 Pennsylvania
234$275,979 
(1)During the second quarter of 2019, the Company completed the merger with New CFH, LLC ("Cambridge") and acquired 165 Burger King restaurants and 55 Popeyes restaurants.
(2)Acquisitions resulting from the exercise of the Company's right of first refusal on acquisitions in certain markets (see note 15).
On April 30, 2019 the Company completed a merger with Cambridge ("the Cambridge Merger") for a purchase price of $259.1 million through the issuance of shares of stock which consisted of (i) approximately 7.4 million shares of common stock, (ii) 10,000 shares of the Company's newly designated Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, which were converted into approximately 7.5 million shares of common stock on August 29, 2019, and (iii) the retirement of approximately $113.8 million of the indebtedness of Cambridge, net of cash acquired. All shares issued are subject to a two year restriction on sale or transfer subject to certain limited exceptions. As part of the transaction, Cambridge Franchise Holdings LLC ("Cambridge Holdings") has the right to designate up to two director nominees and two Cambridge Holdings executives joined the Company's Board of Directors on April 30, 2019.
Under the purchase method of accounting, the aggregate purchase price is allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets based on their estimated fair values on the acquisition date. The purchase price allocation valued the common stock at $145.3 million based on the $9.81 closing price of the Company's stock on the date of acquisition.
The Company allocated the aggregate purchase price to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired in the Cambridge Merger at their estimated fair values. The Company engaged a third party valuation specialist to assist with the valuation of franchise rights, leasehold improvements and favorable and unfavorable leases included in the operating right-to-use assets acquired. The fair value of other property and equipment and franchise agreements was based on the carrying value of the respective assets given that in the three years prior to the Cambridge Merger, Cambridge had completed valuations in connection with its own acquisition of 132 restaurants and also recently constructed 33 new restaurants. The fair value of the operating lease liability is based upon the lease payments over the remaining lease term discounted by the Company's incremental borrowing rate. The deferred income tax liability allocated from the purchase price represents book and tax differences primarily related to the fair value of the acquired franchise rights.
Goodwill recorded in connection with the Cambridge Merger represents the excess of the purchase price over the aggregate fair value of net assets acquired and is related to the benefits expected as a result of the merger, including sales, operating synergies, development and growth opportunities. The Company believes that Cambridge's existing Burger King and Popeyes restaurant portfolios provide it with significant growth and development opportunities and due to the geographic location of the restaurants mitigate the dependence on the economic performance of any one particular geographic location or restaurant concept.
F- 13
Closing Date Number of Restaurants Purchase Price Market Location
February 28, 2017 43 $20,366
 Cincinnati, Ohio
June 5, 2017(1)17 16,355
 Baltimore, Maryland and Washington, DC
November 28, 2017 4 1,202
 Maine
  64
 $37,923
  

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 20162021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(InTabular amounts in thousands, of dollars except share and per share amounts)

The following table summarizes the final allocation of the aggregate purchase price for the Cambridge Merger:
Inventory$2,839 
Prepaid expenses2,947 
Other assets1,846 
Land and buildings21,257 
Restaurant equipment25,358 
Restaurant equipment - subject to finance leases488 
Right-of-use assets251,431 
Leasehold improvements3,498 
Franchise fees7,300 
Franchise rights (Note 4)174,500 
Deferred taxes(44,292)
Goodwill (Note 4)84,060 
Finance lease obligations for restaurant equipment(568)
Operating lease liabilities(255,897)
Accounts payable(8,014)
Accrued payroll, related taxes and benefits(3,133)
Other liabilities(4,537)
Net assets acquired$259,083 
The Company allocated the aggregate purchase price for the 2019 acquisitions other than the Cambridge Merger at their estimated fair values. The following table summarizes the final allocation of the aggregate purchase price for these other 2019 acquisitions:
Inventory$158 
Restaurant equipment743 
Restaurant equipment - subject to finance leases150 
Right-of-use assets9,515 
Leasehold improvements6,205 
Franchise fees394 
Franchise rights (Note 4)9,809 
Deferred taxes29 
Goodwill (Note 4)86 
Operating lease liabilities(9,968)
Finance lease obligations for restaurant equipment(185)
Accounts payable(40)
Net assets acquired$16,896 
The results of operations for the restaurants acquired are included from the closing date of the respective acquisition. The 2019 acquired restaurants contributed restaurant sales of $288.9 million during the year ended January 3, 2021 and $201.9 million and other revenue of $10.2 million during the year ended December 29, 2019. It is impracticable to disclose net earnings for the post-acquisition periods as net earnings of these restaurants were not tracked on a collective basis due to the integration of administrative functions, including field supervision.
The pro forma impact on the results of operations for restaurants acquired in 2019 and 2018 is included below. The pro forma results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred had the
F- 14

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

restaurants acquired in 2019 and 2018 been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented, nor are they necessarily indicative of any future consolidated operating results. The following table summarizes the Company's unaudited proforma operating results:
Year Ended
December 29, 2019December 30, 2018
Restaurant sales$1,568,533 $1,518,841 
Net income (loss)(25,586)27,730 
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share(0.59)0.60 
This pro forma financial information does not give effect to any anticipated synergies, operating efficiencies or cost savings or any integration costs related to the 2019 acquired restaurants. The proforma results exclude transaction costs recorded as general and administrative expenses of $4.1 million and $1.4 million during the years ended December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018, respectively.
2018 Acquisitions
During the year ended December 30, 2018 the Company acquired a total of 44 restaurants from other franchisees, which are referred to as the "2018 acquired restaurants", in the following transactions:
Closing DateNumber of RestaurantsPurchase PriceMarket Location
February 13, 2018(1)1$New York
August 21, 2018(2)21,666 Detroit, Michigan
September 5, 2018(2)3125,930 Western Virginia
October 2, 20181010,506 South Carolina and Georgia
44$38,102 
(1) AcquisitionThis acquisition resulted in a bargain purchase gain because the fair value of net assets acquired, largely representing a franchise right asset of $0.3 million, exceeded the total fair value of consideration paid by $0.2 million. The Company recognized this gain and recorded it as "Gain on bargain purchase" in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
(2)Acquisitions resulting from the exercise of the ROFR.Company's right of first refusal on acquisitions in certain markets (see note 15).

F- 15

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The Company allocated the aggregate purchase price to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired in the acquisitions at their estimated fair values. The following table summarizes the final allocation of the aggregate purchase price for the three 2017four 2018 acquisitions:
Trade and other receivables$486
Inventory616
Prepaid expenses192
Other assets52
Restaurant equipment3,290
Restaurant equipment - subject to capital lease264
Leasehold improvements2,496
Franchise fees1,315
Franchise rights (Note 4)24,691
Favorable leases (Note 4)1,100
Deferred taxes(4,357)
Goodwill (Note 4)13,923
Capital lease obligations for restaurant equipment(316)
Unfavorable leases (Note 4)(2,997)
Accounts payable(880)
Accrued payroll, related taxes and benefits(270)
Other liabilities(1,682)
Net assets acquired$37,923
Inventory$401 
Restaurant equipment2,092 
Restaurant equipment - subject to capital lease43 
Leasehold improvements1,329 
Franchise fees1,264 
Franchise rights (Note 4)31,275 
Favorable leases587 
Deferred taxes346 
Goodwill (Note 4)1,677 
Capital lease obligations for restaurant equipment(49)
Unfavorable leases(624)
Accounts payable(9)
Net assets acquired$38,332 
The results of operations for the restaurants acquired are included from the closing date of the respective acquisition. The 20172018 acquired restaurants contributed restaurant sales of $64.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. It is impracticable to disclose net earnings for the post-acquisition periods as net earnings of these restaurants were not tracked on a collective basis due to the integration of administrative functions, including field supervision. During the year ended December 31, 2017, acquisition costs of approximately $1.8 million related to the 2017 acquisitions were recorded in general and administrative expense.
The pro forma impact on the results of operations for restaurants acquired in 2017 and 2016 is included below. The pro forma results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred had the restaurants acquired in 2017 and 2016 been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented, nor are they necessarily indicative of any future consolidated operating results. The following table summarizes the Company's unaudited proforma operating results:
 Year Ended 
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 
Restaurant sales$1,114,642
 $1,071,437
 
Net income$9,546
 $52,730
(1)
Basic and diluted net income per share$0.21
 $1.18
 
(1) Includes a tax benefit of $30.4 million for the reversal of the Company's valuation allowance on its net deferred income tax assets (see Note 10).
CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 2016
(In thousands of dollars except share and per share amounts)


This pro forma financial information does not give effect to any anticipated synergies, operating efficiencies or cost savings or any integration costs related to the 2017 acquired restaurants.
2016 Acquisitions
During the year ended January 1, 2017, the Company acquired a total of 56 restaurants from other franchisees, which are referred to as the "2016 acquired restaurants", in the following transactions:
Closing Date Number of Restaurants Purchase Price Number of Fee-Owned Restaurants (1)Market Location
February 23, 2016(2)12
 $7,127
  Scranton/Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania
May 25, 2016 6
 12,080
 5Detroit, Michigan
July 14, 2016(2)4
 5,445
 3Detroit, Michigan
August 23, 2016 7
 8,755
 6Portland, Maine
October 4, 2016 3
 1,623
  Raleigh, North Carolina
November��15, 2016 17
 7,251
  Pittsburgh and Johnstown, Pennsylvania
December 1, 2016 7
 5,807
 1Columbus, Ohio
  56
 $48,088
 15
 
(1)The 2016 acquisitions included the purchase of 15 fee-owned properties of which fourteen were sold in sale-leaseback transactions during 2016 for net proceeds of $19.1 million.
(2)Acquisitions resulting from the exercise of the ROFR.
The Company allocated the aggregate purchase price to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired in the acquisitions at their estimated fair values. The following table summarizes the final allocation of the aggregate purchase price for the seven 2016 acquisitions:
Inventory$558
Land and buildings19,387
Restaurant equipment1,599
Restaurant equipment - subject to capital lease435
Leasehold improvements2,464
Franchise fees1,121
Franchise rights21,202
Favorable leases390
Deferred taxes216
Goodwill2,431
Capital lease obligations for restaurant equipment(492)
Unfavorable leases(1,152)
Other liabilities(71)
Net assets acquired$48,088
The results of operations for the restaurants acquired are included from the closing date of the respective acquisition. The 2016 acquired restaurants contributed restaurant sales of $70.8$52.9 million and $28.6$16.9 million during the years ended December 31, 201729, 2019 and January 1, 2017, respectively. It is impracticable to disclose net earnings for the post-acquisition periods as net earnings of these restaurants were not tracked on a collective basis due to the integration
CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 2016
(In thousands of dollars except share and per share amounts)


of administrative functions, including field supervision. During the year ended January 1, 2017, acquisition costs of approximately $1.6 million related to the 2016 acquisitions were recorded in general and administrative expense.
The pro forma impact on the results of operations for restaurants acquired in 2016 and 2015 is included below. The pro forma results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred had the restaurants acquired in 2016 and 2015 been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented, nor are they necessarily indicative of any future consolidated operating results. The following table summarizes the Company's unaudited proforma operating results:
 Year Ended
 (52 weeks) (53 weeks)
 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
Restaurant sales$984,164
 $986,935
Net income$48,264
(1)$12,078
Basic and diluted net income per share$1.07
 $0.27
(1) Includes a tax benefit of $30.4 million for the reversal of the Company's valuation allowance on its net deferred income tax assets (see Note 10).
This pro forma financial information does not give effect to any anticipated synergies, operating efficiencies or cost savings or any integration costs related to the 2016 acquired restaurants.
2015 Acquisitions
During the year ended January 3, 2016, the Company acquired an aggregate of 55 restaurants from other franchisees, which are referred to as the "2015 acquired restaurants", in the following transactions:
Closing Date Number of Restaurants Purchase Price Number of Fee-Owned Restaurants (1)Market Location
March 31, 2015 4
 $794
  Northern Vermont
August 4, 2015(2)5
 663
  Charlotte, North Carolina
October 1, 2015(2)5
 5,044
 1Wheeling, West Virginia
October 20, 2015 1
 709
  Kalamazoo, Michigan
November 17, 2015 2
 618
  Evansville, Indiana
November 17, 2015
6
 10,945
 5Evansville, Indiana
December 1, 2015(2)23
 26,175
 10Detroit, Michigan
December 8, 2015 9
 7,802
  Northern New Jersey
  55
 $52,750
 16
 
(1)The 2015 acquisitions included the purchase of 16 fee-owned properties. Three of these fee-owned properties were sold in sale-leaseback transactions during the fourth quarter of 2015 for net proceeds of $4.3 million and 12 fee-owned properties were sold in sale-leaseback transactions during 2016 for net proceeds of $17.7 million.
(2)Acquisitions resulting from the exercise of the ROFR.
CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 2016
(In thousands of dollars except share and per share amounts)


The Company allocated the aggregate purchase price to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired in the acquisitions at their estimated fair values. The following table summarizes the final allocation of the aggregate purchase price for the eight 2015 acquisitions:
Inventory$544
Land and buildings22,614
Restaurant equipment2,844
Restaurant equipment - subject to capital lease443
Leasehold improvements1,770
Franchise fees1,000
Franchise rights20,666
Favorable leases1,475
Goodwill2,645
Capital lease obligations for restaurant equipment(494)
Unfavorable leases(324)
Other liabilities(433)
Net assets acquired$52,750
The results of operations for the restaurants acquired are included from the closing date of the respective acquisition. The 2015 acquired restaurants contributed restaurant sales of $70.4 million and $12.9 million during the years ended January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016,December 28, 2018, respectively. It is impracticable to disclose net earnings for the post-acquisition periods as net earnings of these restaurants were not tracked on a collective basis due to the integration of administrative functions, including field supervision. During the year ended January 3, 2016, acquisition costs of approximately $0.2 million related to the 2015 acquisitions were recorded in general and administrative expense.
The pro forma impact on the results of operations for restaurants acquired in 20152018 is included below. The pro forma results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred had the acquisitionsrestaurants acquired in 20152018 been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented, nor are they necessarily indicative of any future consolidated operating results. The following table summarizes the Company's unaudited proforma operating results:
 Year Ended
 (53 weeks)
 January 3, 2016
Restaurant sales$918,456
Net income$6,447
Basic and diluted net income per share$0.14
Year Ended
December 30, 2018
Restaurant sales$1,217,891 
Net income13,684 
Basic and diluted net income per share0.30 
This pro forma financial information does not give effect to any anticipated synergies, operating efficiencies or cost savings or any transactionintegration costs related to the 20152018 acquired restaurants. The proforma results exclude acquisition costs recorded as general and administrative expenses of $1.4 million during the year ended December 30, 2018.
Acquired Intangible Assets
Goodwill recorded in connection with thesethe acquisitions in 2019 and 2018 represents costs in excess of fair values assigned to the underlying net assets of acquired restaurants. Acquired goodwill that is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes was $6,668$47.2 million in 2017, $1,8032019 and $0.5 million in 20162018.


F- 16

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and $3,311 in 2015.per share amounts)

The weighted average amortization period of the intangible assets acquired is as follows:
CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
2019 Acquisitions2018 Acquisitions
Favorable leases— 17.2
Unfavorable leases— 18.3
Franchise rights32.731.6
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)Beginning in 2019, favorable and unfavorable leases are now included as a component of the Company's operating right-of-use assets.
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 2016
(In thousands of dollars except share and per share amounts)


 2017 Acquisitions 2016 Acquisitions 2015 Acquisitions
Favorable leases15.2 15.4 15.5
Unfavorable leases14.3 12.0 6.5
Franchise rights27.9 28.0 26.6
3. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment at January 3, 2021 and December 31, 2017 and January 1, 201729, 2019 consisted of the following: 
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017January 3, 2021December 29, 2019
Land $8,659
 $8,112
Land$8,301 $8,800 
Owned buildings 9,950
 9,174
Owned buildings13,325 12,490 
Leasehold improvements 301,091
 265,008
Leasehold improvements424,685 413,543 
Equipment 227,284
 203,412
Equipment320,909 311,423 
Assets subject to capital leases 16,874
 16,948
Assets subject to finance leasesAssets subject to finance leases16,663 17,132 
 563,858
 502,654
783,883 763,388 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (289,760) (254,807)Less accumulated depreciation and amortization(434,328)(377,810)
 $274,098
 $247,847
$349,555 $385,578 
Assets subject to capitalfinance leases primarily pertain torepresents buildings leased for certain restaurant locations and certain leases of restaurant equipment and had accumulated amortization at January 3, 2021 and December 31, 201729, 2019 of $16.0 million and January 1, 2017 of $12,245 and $11,008,$15.2 million, respectively. Depreciation expense for all property and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 20162021, December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018 was $45,700, $39,918$64.4 million, $60.8 million and $33,878,$49.3 million, respectively.
4. Intangible Assets
Goodwill. The Company is required to reviewtest goodwill for impairment annually, or more frequently, when events and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired. If the determined fair value of goodwill is less than the related carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized. The Company performs its annual impairment assessment as of the last day of the fiscal year. In performing its goodwill impairment test, the Company compared the net book value of its reporting unit to its estimated fair value, the latter determined by employing a combination of a discounted cash flow analysis and a market-based approach. There have been no0 recorded goodwill impairment losses during the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016.2021, December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018.
Goodwill at December 30, 2018$38,469 
Acquisitions of restaurants (Note 2)84,150 
Goodwill at December 29, 2019122,619 
Acquisitions of restaurants (Note 2)
Goodwill at January 3, 2021$122,619 

F- 17

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Goodwill at January 3, 2016$20,438
Acquisitions of restaurants (Note 2)2,431
Goodwill at January 1, 201722,869
Acquisitions of restaurants (Note 2)13,923
Goodwill at December 31, 2017$36,792
Franchise Rights. Amounts allocated to franchise rights for each acquisition of Burger KingKing® and Popeyes® restaurants are amortized using the straight-line method over the average remaining term of the acquired franchise agreements plus one twenty-yeartwenty-year renewal period. The following is a summary of the Company’s franchise rights as of the respective balance sheet dates:
  December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
  Gross Carrying Amount 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Gross Carrying Amount 
Accumulated
Amortization
Franchise rights $252,643
 $100,615
 $227,952
 $93,799
CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 2016
(In thousands of dollars except share and per share amounts)


Balance at December 30, 2018$175,897 
Acquisitions of restaurants (Note 2)184,309 
Amortization expense(11,265)
Balance at December 29, 2019348,941 
Amortization expense(14,344)
Balance at January 3, 2021$334,597 
Amortization expense related to franchise rights for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 201630, 2018 was $6,816, $5,930 and $4,685, respectively, and the$7.4 million. The Company expects annual amortization to be $7,130$13.7 million in each of the next five fiscal years. NoNaN impairment charges were recorded related to the Company’s franchise rights during the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016.2021, December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018.
Favorable and Unfavorable Leases. Amounts allocated to favorable and unfavorable leases are being amortized using the straight-line method over the remaining terms of the underlying lease agreements as a net reduction of restaurant rent expense. The following is a summary of the Company’s favorable and unfavorable leases as of the respective balance sheet dates, which are included as assets and liabilities, respectively, on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets:
  December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
  Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated
Amortization
Favorable leases $7,805
 $1,943
 $7,201
 $1,760
Unfavorable leases $18,164
 $5,053
 $16,329
 $4,643
The net reduction of rent expense related to the amortization of favorable and unfavorable leases for the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016 was $892, $869 and $799, respectively, and the Company expects the net reduction of rent expense to be $831 in 2018, $766 in 2019, $692 in 2020, $625 in 2021 and $639 in 2022.
5. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Other Lease Charges
The Company reviews its long-lived assets, principally property and equipment, for impairment at the restaurant level. If an indicator of impairment exists for any of its assets, an estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows over the life of the primary asset for each restaurant is compared to that long-lived asset’s carrying value. If the carrying value is greater than the undiscounted cash flow, the Company then determines the fair value of the asset and if an asset is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured by the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value. For closed restaurant locations, the Company reviews the future minimum lease payments and related ancillary costs from the date of the restaurant closure to the end of the remaining lease term and records a lease charge for the lease liabilities to be incurred, net of any estimated sublease recoveries.
TheFor restaurants reviewed for impairment the Company determined the fair value of restaurant equipment, for those restaurants reviewed for impairment, based on current economic conditions and the Company’s history of using these assets in the operation of its business.conditions. These fair value asset measurements rely on significant unobservable inputs and are considered Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
During the year ended December 31, 2017January 3, 2021, the Company recorded impairment and other lease charges of $2.8$12.8 million including $0.7consisting of $1.2 million of capital expenditures at previously impaired restaurants, $1.1$5.0 million related to initial impairment charges for five15 underperforming restaurants, $0.9 million of other lease charges of $4.6 million primarily duefrom 22 restaurant closures, and $2.0 million related to four restaurantsimpairment of its right of first refusal under its Area Development and an acquired administrative office closed during the period and non-cash losses of $0.1 million associatedRemodeling Agreement with the sale-leaseback of one restaurant property.BKC (see Note 15)
During the year ended January 1, 2017,December 29, 2019, the Company recorded impairment and other lease charges of $2.4$3.6 million including $0.9$0.3 million for capital expenditures at previously impaired restaurants, $0.2$1.3 million related to initial impairment charges for four7 underperforming restaurants, and non-cash lossesother lease charges of $1.2$1.9 million associated withmostly related to the sale-leasebackclosing of seven restaurant properties.the six convenience stores acquired in 2019.  
During the year ended January 3, 2016,December 30, 2018, the Company recorded impairment and other lease charges of $3.1$3.7 million including other lease charges of $1.6 million associated with the closure of ten of the Company's restaurants, impairment charges of $1.3$0.4 million for capital expenditures at previously impaired restaurants, and $0.2$0.4 million related to initial impairment charges for two6 underperforming restaurants.restaurants, $1.9 million related to the write-off of defective product holding unit kitchen equipment that was replaced, losses of $0.8 million associated with the sale-leaseback of 4 restaurant properties, and other lease charges of $0.2 million.
F- 18

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 20162021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(InTabular amounts in thousands, of dollars except share and per share amounts)


The following table presents the activity in the accrual for closed restaurant locations:
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
Balance, beginning of year$1,513
 $2,088
Provisions for closures1,174
 59
Changes in estimates of accrued costs81
 (89)
Payments, net(862) (691)
Other adjustments, including the effect of discounting future obligations122
 146
Balance, end of year$2,028
 $1,513
Changes in estimates of accrued costs primarily relate to revisions of terminations of certain closed restaurant leases, changes in assumptions for sublease income assumptions and other costs.
6. Other Liabilities, Long-Term
Other liabilities, long-term, at January 3, 2021 and December 31, 2017 and January 1, 201729, 2019 consisted of the following:
January 3, 2021December 29, 2019
Accrued occupancy costs$2,394 $8,523 
Accrued workers’ compensation and general liability claims5,499 5,370 
Interest rate swap liability6,062 
Deferred compensation4,419 3,902 
Deferred federal payroll taxes10,808 
Other290 289 
$29,472 $18,084 
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
Deferred rent$14,040
 $11,498
Other accrued occupancy costs3,189
 3,254
Accrued workers’ compensation and general liability claims3,353
 3,364
Deferred compensation3,053
 1,756
Other175
 158
 $23,810
 $20,030
On March 27, 2020, the United States enacted the CARES Act as a response to the economic uncertainty resulting from COVID-19. The CARES Act provided for deferred payment of the employer portion of social security taxes through the end of 2020, with 50% of the deferred amount due December 31, 2021 and the remaining 50% due December 31, 2022. As of January 3, 2021, the Company deferred $21.6 million related to this provision, of which $10.8 million was recorded in accrued payroll, related taxes and benefits and $10.8 million was recorded in other liabilities, long-term in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Other accrued occupancy costs above include long-term obligations pertaining to closed restaurant locations, contingent rent and unamortized lease incentives.
7. Leases
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting economic uncertainty in the restaurant industry, the Company contacted each of its landlords to potentially negotiate accommodations to preserve cash. For certain leases the Company was able to modify existing payment terms, in some cases through deferral of existing payments until future periods and in some cases through a reduction in payments due during this period. The Company utilizes land and buildingselected the practical expedient to not evaluate whether a deferral of rent within the current term is a lease modification. Any concessions which resulted in its operations under variousextension of the existing lease agreements. The Company does not consider any one of these individual leases material to the Company's operations. Initial lease terms are generallyterm were accounted for twenty years and, in many cases, provide for renewal options and in most cases rent escalations. Certain leases require contingent rent, determined as a percentagelease modification under the current GAAP guidance. The total rent that was or will be deferred as a result of sales as defined byrequests for relief from our landlords other than BKC was $5.8 million, of which $4.8 million was or is expected to be repaid over various periods that began in the termsthird quarter of the applicable lease agreement. For most locations,2020. Additionally, the Company is obligatedreceived $0.4 million in 2020 from BKC for occupancyconcessions related costs including paymentto leases the Company subleases from BKC with third party landlords (see Note 15). As of property taxes, insurance and utilities.January 3, 2021, $3.2 million remains to be repaid to landlords related to these deferrals.
During the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016,2021, December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018, the Company sold 3, 38twelve, twenty-seven and 7five restaurant properties, respectively, in sale-leaseback transactions for net proceeds of $4,257, $53,599$22.5 million, $48.4 million and $9,148,$8.4 million, respectively. These leases have been classified as operating leases and generally contain a twenty-year initial term plus renewal options.
Deferred gains from sale-leaseback transactions of restaurant properties of $716, $1,480 and $16 were recognized during the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017, and January 3, 2016, respectively, and are being amortized over the term of the related leases. The amortization of deferred gains from sale-leaseback transactions was $1,626, $1,788 and $2,535 for the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016, respectively.  






F- 19

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 20162021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(InTabular amounts in thousands, of dollars except share and per share amounts)


Minimum rentRent commitments under capitalfinance and non-cancelable operating leases at December 31, 2017January 3, 2021 were as follows :follows:
Fiscal year ending:Operating LeasesFinance Leases
January 2, 2022$99,191 $583 
January 1, 202398,850 240 
December 31, 202398,005 68 
December 29, 202496,853 42 
December 28, 202594,613 28 
Thereafter877,149 59 
Total lease payments1,364,661 1,020 
Less: imputed interest(512,877)(112)
Present value of lease liabilities851,784 908 
Less: current portion(41,815)(525)
Total long-term lease liabilities$809,969 $383 
Lease Cost
The components and classification of lease expense for the years ended January 3, 2021 and December 29, 2019 are as follows:
Year ended
Lease costClassificationJanuary 3, 2021December 29, 2019
Operating lease cost (1)Restaurant rent expense$102,651 $90,718 
Operating lease costGeneral and administrative606 $579 
Variable lease cost - variable rentRestaurant rent expense16,245 $16,454 
Variable lease cost - common area maintenanceOther restaurant operating expenses521 $617 
Sublease incomeRestaurant rent expense(452)$(25)
Finance lease cost:
Amortization of right-of-use assetsDepreciation and amortization1,233 $1,778 
Interest on lease liabilitiesInterest expense130 $256 
Total lease cost$120,934 $110,377 
(1)Includes short-term leases which are not material.

F- 20
Fiscal year ending:
Capital  
 
Operating  
December 30, 2018$2,166
 $68,336
December 29, 20192,159
 67,207
January 3, 20211,433
 65,709
January 2, 2022329
 64,958
January 1, 2023177
 64,559
Thereafter183
 600,901
Total minimum lease payments6,447
 $931,670
     Less amount representing interest(766)  
Total obligations under capital leases5,681
  
     Less current portion(1,808)  
Long-term obligations under capital leases$3,873
  
Total rent expense on operating leases, including contingent rent on both operating and capital leases, was as follows:
 Year ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
Minimum rent on real property$68,329
 $59,076
 $53,085
Contingent rent on real property7,619
 5,738
 5,011
Restaurant rent expense75,948
 64,814
 58,096
Administrative and equipment rent328
 267
 276
 $76,276
 $65,081
 $58,372
8. Long-term Debt
Long-term debt at December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017 consisted of the following:
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
Collateralized:   
Carrols Restaurant Group 8% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes$275,000
 $200,000
Senior Credit Facility - Revolving credit borrowings
 13,500
Capital leases5,681
 7,039
 280,681
 220,539
Less: current portion of capital leases(1,808) (1,616)
Less: deferred financing costs(4,770) (3,815)
Add: bond premium4,416
 
Total Long-term Debt$278,519
 $215,108
8% Notes. On April 29, 2015, the Company issued $200.0 millionof 8.0% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2022 (the "Existing Notes") pursuant to an indenture dated as of April 29, 2015 governing such notes. On June 23, 2017, the Company issued an additional $75.0 million principal amount of 8.0% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2022 (the "Additional Notes" and together with the "Existing Notes", the "8% Notes") for net proceeds of $35.5 million, after repayment of outstanding revolving credit borrowings of $42.6 million and transaction fees of $1.8 million. The 8% Notes mature and are payable on May 1, 2022. Interest is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 commencing November 1, 2015. The 8% Notes are guaranteed by the Company's subsidiaries and are

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 20162021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(InTabular amounts in thousands, of dollars except share and per share amounts)


Total rent expense for the year ended December 30, 2018 on operating leases, including contingent rent on both operating and finance leases, was as follows:
secured by second-priority liens on substantially all
Year ended
December 30, 2018
Minimum rent on real property$72,206 
Contingent rent on real property9,203 
Restaurant rent expense81,409 
Administrative and equipment rent273 
$81,682 
Lease Position
    Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases was as follows as of the Company's and its subsidiaries' assets (including a pledge of all of the capital stock and equity interests of its subsidiaries).
The 8% Notes are redeemable at the option of the Company in whole or in part at any time after May 1, 2018 at a price of 104% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, if redeemed before May 1, 2019, 102% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, if redeemed after May 1, 2019 but before May 1, 2020 and 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, if redeemed after May 1, 2020. Prior to May 1, 2018, the Company may redeem some or all of the 8% Notes at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount of each note plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, and a make-whole premium. In addition, the indenture governing the 8% Notes also provides that the Company may redeem up to 35% of the 8% Notes using the proceeds of certain equity offerings completed before May 15, 2018.
The 8% Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed, unconditionally and in full by the Company's subsidiaries which are directly or indirectly 100% owned by the Company. Separate condensed consolidating information is not included because Carrols Restaurant Group is a holding company that has no independent assets or operations. There are no significant restrictions on its ability or any of the guarantor subsidiaries' ability to obtain funds from its respective subsidiaries. All consolidated amounts in our financial statements are representative of the combined guarantors.
The indenture governing the 8% Notes includes certain covenants, including limitations and restrictions on the Company and its subsidiaries who are guarantors under such indenture to, among other things: incur indebtedness or issue preferred stock; incur liens; pay dividends or make distributions in respect of capital stock or make certain other restricted payments or investments; sell assets; agree to payment restrictions affecting certain subsidiaries; enter into transaction with affiliates; or merge, consolidate or sell substantially all of the Company's assets.
The indenture governing the 8% Notes and the security agreement provide that any capital stock and equity interests of any of the Company's subsidiaries will be excluded from the collateral to the extent that the par value, book value or market value of such capital stock or equity interests exceeds 20% of the aggregate principal amount of the 8% Notes then outstanding.
The indenture governing the 8% Notes contains customary default provisions, including without limitation, a cross default provision pursuant to which it is an event of default under the 8% Notes and the indenture governing the 8% Notes if there is a default under any of the Company's indebtedness having an outstanding principal amount of $20.0 million or more which results in the acceleration of such indebtedness prior to its stated maturity or is caused by a failure to pay principal when due.
Senior Credit Facility. On May 30, 2012, the Company entered into a senior credit facility, which has a maturity date of February 12,January 3, 2021 and was most recently amended on June 20, 2017 to increase the permitted indebtedness of our second lien notes to a principal amount not to exceed $300.0 million in order to provide for the additional $75.0 million of the 8% Notes issued on June 23, 2017. On January 13, 2017, the senior credit facility was amended to, among other things, provide for maximum revolving credit borrowings of up to $73.0 million (including $20.0 million available for letters of credit). The amended senior credit facility also provides for potential incremental borrowing increases of up to $25.0 million, in the aggregate. As of December 31, 2017, there were no revolving credit borrowings outstanding and $12.8 million of letters of credit were issued under the amended senior credit facility. After reserving for issued letters of credit and outstanding revolving credit borrowings, $60.2 million was available for revolving credit borrowings under the amended senior credit facility.29, 2019:
Borrowings under the amended senior credit facility bear interest at a rate per annum, at the Company’s option, based on (all terms as defined in the Company's amended senior credit facility):
LeasesClassificationJanuary 3, 2021December 29, 2019
Assets
Operating leasesOperating right-of-use assets, net$799,962 $811,016 
Finance leasesProperty and equipment, net644 1,882 
Total leased assets$800,606 $812,898 
Liabilities
Current
Operating leasesCurrent portion of operating lease liabilities$41,815 $40,805 
Finance leasesCurrent portion of long-term debt and finance lease liabilities525 1,616 
Long-term
Operating leasesOperating lease liabilities809,969 808,292 
Finance leasesLong-term debt and finance lease liabilities383 908 
Total lease liabilities$852,692 $851,621 
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term
Operating leases14.0 years14.5 years
Finance leases2.4 years2.0 years
Weighted Average Discount Rate
Operating leases7.0 %7.0 %
Finance leases8.9 %7.9 %
(i) the Alternate Base Rate plus the applicable margin of 1.75% to 2.75% based on the Company’s Adjusted Leverage Ratio, or
F- 21
(ii) the LIBOR Rate plus the applicable margin of 2.75% to 3.75% based on the Company’s Adjusted Leverage Ratio.

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 20162021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(InTabular amounts in thousands, of dollars except share and per share amounts)

Other Information
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases for the years ended January 3, 2021 and December 29, 2019 are as follows:
Year ended
January 3, 2021December 29, 2019
Gain on sale-leaseback transactions$189 $636 
Lease assets and liabilities resulting from lease modifications and new leases50,978 76,878 
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases98,561 87,220 
Operating cash flows from finance leases130 256 
Financing cash flows from finance lease obligations1,617 2,170 

8. Long-term Debt
Long-term debt at January 3, 2021 and December 29, 2019 consisted of the following:
January 3, 2021December 29, 2019
Collateralized:
Senior Credit Facility:
Term Loan B borrowings$419,375 $422,875 
Term Loan B-1 borrowings73,875 
Revolving credit borrowings45,750 
Finance lease liabilities908 2,524 
494,158 471,149 
Less: current portion of long-term debt and finance lease liabilities(5,525)(5,866)
Less: unamortized debt issuance costs(7,777)(7,768)
Less: original issue discount(5,161)(1,950)
Total Long-term Debt$475,695 $455,565 
On April 30, 2019, the Company entered into new senior secured credit facilities in an aggregate principal amount of $550.0 million, consisting of (i) a Term Loan B Facility in an aggregate principal amount of $425.0 million (the “Term Loan B Facility”) maturing on April 30, 2026 and (ii) a new revolving credit facility (including a sub-facility of $35.0 million for standby letters of credit) in an aggregate principal amount of $125.0 million maturing on April 30, 2024 (the “Revolving Credit Facility” and, together with the Term Loan B Facility, the (“New Senior Credit Facilities”).
On December 13, 2019, the Company entered into the First Amendment to Credit Agreement (the "First Amendment") which amended a financial covenant under the Senior Credit Facilities applicable solely with respect to the Revolving Credit Facility that previously required the Company to maintain quarterly a Total Net Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) of not greater than 4.75 to 1.00 (measured on a most recent four quarter basis), to now require that the Company maintain only a First Lien Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) of not greater than 5.75 to 1.00 (as measured on a most recent four quarter basis) if, and only if, on the last day of any fiscal quarter (beginning with the fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2019), the sum of the aggregate principal amount of outstanding revolving credit borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and the aggregate face amount of letters of credit issued under the Revolving Credit Facility (excluding undrawn letters of credit in an aggregate face amount up to $12.0 million) exceeds 35% of the aggregate amount of the maximum
F- 22

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

revolving credit borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. The First Amendment also reduced the aggregate maximum revolving credit borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility by $10.0 million to a total of $115.0 million.
At December 31, 2017,On March 25, 2020, the Company'sCompany entered into the Second Amendment to its Senior Credit Facilities (the "Second Amendment"). The Second Amendment increased the aggregate maximum commitments available for revolving credit borrowings (including standby letters of credit) under the Revolving Credit Facility (the "Revolving Committed Amount") by $15.4 million to a total of $130.4 million.
The Second Amendment amended the definition of Applicable Margin (such definition and all other definitions used herein and otherwise not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Senior Credit Facilities) to provide that on and after the date of the Second Amendment (the "Second Amendment Effective Date"), the Applicable Margin for borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility (including Letter of Credit Fees) shall be at a rate per annum equal to (a) for so long as the Revolving Committed Amount is greater than $115.0 million, (i) for the period commencing on the Second Amendment Effective Date and including the date that is 179 days after the Second Amendment Effective Date, 3.5% for LIBOR Rate Loans and 2.5% for Alternate Base Rate Loans, (ii) for the period commencing on the date that is 180 days after the Second Amendment Effective Date, through and including the date that is 269 days after the Second Amendment Effective Date, 4.25% for LIBOR Rate Loans and 3.25% for Alternate Base Rate Loans, (iii) for the period commencing on the date that is 270 days after the Second Amendment Effective Date, through and including the date that is 364 days after the Second Amendment Effective Date, 4.5% for LIBOR Rate Loans and 3.5% for Alternate Base Rate Loans and (iv) for the period commencing on the date that is 365 days after the Second Amendment Effective Date and thereafter, 4.75% for LIBOR Rate Loans and 3.75% for Alternate Base Rate Loans and (b) for so long as the Revolving Committed Amount is equal to or less than $115.0 million, 3.5% for LIBOR Rate Loans and 2.5% for Alternate Base Rate Loans.
The Second Amendment provides that beginning on the 180th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date and for so long as the Revolving Committed Amount is greater than $115.0 million, the Company shall pay to the Administrative Agent, for the ratable benefit of the Revolving Facility Lenders, a commitment fee (the "Ticking Fee") on the average daily amount of the Revolving Committed Amount at a rate per annum equal to (a) 0.125% for the 180th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date through and including the 269th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date, (b) 0.25% for the 270th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date through and including the 364th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date and (c) 1.00% for the 365th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date and thereafter. The Second Amendment provides that the Ticking Fee will be due and payable quarterly in arrears (calculated on a 360-day basis) on the last Business Day of each calendar quarter and will accrue from the 180th day after the Second Amendment Effective Date for so long as the Revolving Committed Amount is greater than $115.0 million. The Company recorded expense of $0.1 million related to these ticking fees in the year ended January 3, 2021. The Second Amendment also provides that the Company shall use the proceeds of an Extension of Credit which results in the sum of the aggregate principal amount of outstanding Revolving Loans plus the aggregate amount of LOC Obligations equaling an amount in excess of $115.0 million, solely for ongoing operations of the Company and its subsidiaries and shall not be held as cash on the balance sheet.
On April 8, 2020, the Company entered into the Third Amendment to its Senior Credit Facilities which increased the aggregate maximum commitments available for revolving credit borrowings (including standby letters of credit) under the Revolving Credit Facility by $15.4 million to a total of $145.8 million.
On April 16, 2020, the Company entered into the Fourth Amendment to its Senior Credit Facilities (the "Fourth Amendment"). The Fourth Amendment permits the Company to incur and, if necessary, repay indebtedness incurred pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program (the "PPP") under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act, as amended (the "CARES Act"). Subsequent to this amendment, the Company withdrew its application for relief under the PPP and returned the funds upon receipt.
F- 23

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
On June 23, 2020 (the "Fifth Amendment Effective Date"), the Company entered into the Fifth Amendment to its Senior Credit Facilities (the "Fifth Amendment"). The Fifth Amendment increased the Term Loan (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) borrowings in the aggregate principal amount of $75 million of Incremental Term B-1 Loans (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities). The Incremental Term B-1 Loans constitute a new tranche of Term Loans ranking pari passu in right of payment and security with the Initial Term Loans for all purposes under the Senior Credit Facilities. The Incremental Term B-1 Loans have the same terms as outstanding borrowings under the Company's existing term loan B facility pursuant to and in accordance with the Senior Credit Facilities, provided that (i) borrowings under the Incremental Term B-1 Loans will bear interest at a rate per annum, at the Company’s option, of (a) the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) plus the applicable margin was 1.75% andof 5.25% or (b) the LIBOR Rate (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) (which shall not be less than 1% for Incremental Term B-1 Loans) plus the applicable margin was 2.75% basedof 6.25% and (ii) certain prepayments of the Incremental Term B-1 Loans by the Company prior to the first anniversary of the Fifth Amendment Effective Date are subject to a premium to the Administrative Agent (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities), for the ratable account of each applicable Term Loan Lender (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) holding Incremental Term B-1 Loans on the Company's Adjusted Leverage Ratio atdate of such prepayment equal to the endApplicable Make-Whole Amount (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) with respect to the principal amount of the Incremental Term B-1 Loans so prepaid. The principal amount of the Incremental Term B-1 Loans will amortize in an aggregate annual amount equal to 1% of the original principal amount of the Incremental Term B-1 Loans and shall be repayable in consecutive quarterly installments on the last day of the Company's fiscal quarters beginning on the third fiscal quarter of 2017.2020 with the remaining outstanding principal amount of the Incremental Term B-1 Loan and all accrued but unpaid interest and other amounts payable with respect to the Incremental Term B-1 Loan due on April 30, 2026 which is the Term Loan Maturity Date (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities).
The net proceeds of the Incremental Term B-1 Loans were $71.3 million after original issue discount and were used for general corporate purposes, including repayment of the outstanding balance of the Revolving Credit Facility.
The Company’s obligations under the amended senior credit facilitySenior Credit Facilities are guaranteed by its subsidiaries and are secured by first priority liens on substantially all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, including a pledge of all of the capital stock and equity interests of its subsidiaries.
Under the amended senior credit facility,Senior Credit Facilities, the Company is required to make mandatory prepayments of borrowings in the event of dispositions of assets, debt issuances and insurance and condemnation proceeds (all subject to certain exceptions).
The amended senior credit facility containsSenior Credit Facilities contain certain covenants, including without limitation, those limiting the Company’s and its subsidiaries' ability to, among other things, incur indebtedness, incur liens, sell or acquire assets or businesses, change the character of its business in all material respects, engage in transactions with related parties, make certain investments, make certain restricted payments or pay dividends. In addition, the amended senior credit facility requiresSenior Credit Facilities require the Company to meet certain financial ratios, including a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, Adjusted Leverage Ratio and First Lien Leverage Ratio (all(as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) if revolving credit borrowings exceed 35% of the aggregate borrowing capacity, as defineddescribed under the amended senior credit facility).First Amendment above. As there were 0 borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility at January 3, 2021, no First Lien Leverage Ratio calculation was required. The Company was in compliance with the covenants under its senior credit facilitySenior Credit Facilities at December 31, 2017.January 3, 2021.
The amended senior credit facility containsSenior Credit Facilities contain customary default provisions, including that the lenders may terminate their obligation to advance and may declare the unpaid balance of borrowings, or any part thereof, immediately due and payable upon the occurrence and during the continuance of customary defaults which include, without limitation, payment default, covenant defaults, bankruptcy type defaults, cross-defaults on other indebtedness, judgments or upon the occurrence of a change of control.
Prior
F- 24

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The Term Loan B and B-1 borrowings are due and payable in quarterly installments, which began on September 30, 2019. Amounts outstanding at January 3, 2021 are due and payable as follows:
(i) NaN quarterly installments of $1.3 million;
(ii) one final payment of $467.0 million on April 30, 2026.
At January 3, 2021, borrowings under the Senior Secured Second Lien Notes. On May 30, 2012,Credit Facilities bore interest as follows:
(i) Revolving Credit Facility: at a rate per annum equal to (a) the Company issued $150Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) plus 2.50% or (b) LIBOR Rate (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) plus 3.50%.
(ii) Term Loan B borrowings: at a rate per annum equal to (a) the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) plus 2.25% or (b) LIBOR Rate (as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities) plus 3.25%.
(iii) Term Loan B-1 borrowings: at a rate per annum, at the Company’s option, of (a) the Alternate Base Rate plus the applicable margin of 5.25% or (b) the LIBOR Rate (which shall not be less than 1% for Incremental Term B-1 Loans) plus the applicable margin of 6.25%.
As of January 3, 2021, there were no revolving credit borrowings outstanding and $9.7 million of 11.25% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2018 pursuant to an indenture governing such 11.25% Notes. Interestletters of credit issued under the Revolving Credit Facility. After reserving for issued letters of credit and outstanding revolving credit borrowings, $136.1 million was payable semi-annually on May 15 and November 15. The 11.25% Notes were repurchased or redeemed in connection withavailable for revolving credit borrowings under the issuance of the 8.0% Notes on April 29, 2015. The Company recorded a loss on debt extinguishment of $12.6 millionin the year endedRevolving Credit Facility at January 3, 2016 due to the repurchase and redemption of its prior 11.25% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes.2021.
At December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, principal payments required on long-term debt, including capitalfinance leases, were as follows:
2018$1,808
20191,935
20201,341
2021288
2022275,158
Thereafter151
 $280,681
Fiscal year ending:
January 2, 2022$5,525 
January 1, 20235,218 
December 31, 20235,055 
December 29, 20245,034 
December 28, 20255,023 
Thereafter468,303 
$494,158 
The weighted average interest rate on all debt, excluding lease financing obligations, for the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 20162021, December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018 was 7.7%4.6%, 7.9%6.1% and 8.9%7.9%, respectively. Interest expense on the Company’s long-term debt, excluding lease financing obligations, was $21,589, $18,208$27.2 million, $27.8 million and $18,462$23.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016,2021, December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018, respectively.
9. Other Expense (Income)
Interest Rate Swap. In 2017,March 2020, the Company recorded a net gainentered into an interest rate swap agreement with its lenders to mitigate the risk of $0.3 million primarilyincreases in the variable interest rate related to an insurance recovery fromterm loan borrowings under the Term Loan B Facility. The interest rate swap fixes the interest rate on 50% of the outstanding term loan borrowings under the Term Loan B Facility at 0.915% plus the applicable margin in its Senior Credit Facilities. The agreement matures on February 28, 2025 and has a firenotional amount of $220.0 million at one restaurant.January 3, 2021. The differences between the variable LIBOR rate and the interest rate swap rate of 0.915% are settled monthly. The Company made payments of $1.0 million to settle the interest rate swap during the twelve months ended January 3, 2021. The fair value of the Company's interest rate swap agreement was a liability of $6.1 million as of January 3, 2021 and is included in long-term other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the valuation of the Company's interest rate swap were included as a component of other comprehensive income and will be reclassified to earnings as the losses are realized. The Company expects to reclassify net losses totaling $1.7 million into earnings in the next twelve months.
F- 25

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 20162021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(InTabular amounts in thousands, of dollars except share and per share amounts)


The Company's counterparties under this arrangement provided the Company with quarterly statements of the market values of these instruments based on significant inputs that were observable or could be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. The Company classified this within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy described in Note 1. The impact on the derivative liabilities for the Company and the counterparties' non-performance risk to the derivative trades was considered when measuring the fair value of derivative liabilities.
9. Other Income
In 2016,2020, the Company recorded other income, net of $1.3 million, which consisted of gains related to insurance recoveries from property damage at 4 of its restaurants of $2.1 million, net gain on 12 sale-leaseback transactions of $0.2 million and a loss on disposal of assets of $1.0 million.
In 2019, the Company recorded other income, net of $1.9 million which consisted of a $1.9 million gain from a settlement with RBI for their approval of new restaurant development by other franchisees which unfavorably impacted the Company's restaurants, $0.6 million net gains of $1.2on sale-leaseback transactions, a $0.2 million gain related to insurance recoveries from fire at 2 of its restaurants and a loss on a disposal of restaurant equipment of $0.8 million.
In 2018 the Company recorded other income of $0.4 million, primarily related to property insurance recoveries from fires at two restaurants, a gain of $0.5 million related to a settlement for a partial condemnation on one of its operating restaurant properties and expense of $1.85 million related to a settlement of litigation as discussed in Note 14.2 restaurants.
10. Income Taxes
The provision (benefit) for income taxes was comprised of the following:
Year endedYear ended
December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016 January 3, 2021December 29, 2019December 30, 2018
Current:     Current:
Federal$
 $
 $
Federal$$(260)$
State30
 
 
State268 119 326 
30
 
 
268 (141)326 
     
Deferred:     Deferred:
Federal(219) 1,297
 (2,901) Federal(6,039)(9,768)(598)
State793
 992
 (58) State(1,073)(2,214)115 
574
 2,289
 (2,959)(7,112)(11,982)(483)
Change in valuation allowance
 (30,374) 2,959
Increase in valuation allowanceIncrease in valuation allowance13,138 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes$604
 $(28,085) $
Provision (benefit) for income taxes$6,294 $(12,123)$(157)
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amount used for income tax purposes.
F- 26

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 20162021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(InTabular amounts in thousands, of dollars except share and per share amounts)


The components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities at January 3, 2021 and December 31, 2017 and January 1, 201729, 2019 were as follows:
December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2021December 29, 2019
Deferred income tax assets:   Deferred income tax assets: 
Deferred income on sale-leaseback of certain real estate$2,848
 $4,714
Lease financing obligations173
 254
Operating lease liabilitiesOperating lease liabilities$219,096 $218,503 
Federal net operating loss carryforwardsFederal net operating loss carryforwards28,880 30,588 
Tax credit carryforwardsTax credit carryforwards35,650 32,378 
State net operating loss carryforwardsState net operating loss carryforwards6,032 5,388 
Interest expense limitation under section 163 (j)Interest expense limitation under section 163 (j)2,558 
Stock-based compensation expenseStock-based compensation expense1,323 1,274 
Accrued vacation benefitsAccrued vacation benefits2,684 2,440 
Accrued interest rate swapAccrued interest rate swap1,841 
Postretirement benefit obligations877
 1,255
Postretirement benefit obligations853 944 
Stock-based compensation expense827
 599
Federal net operating loss carryforwards17,730
 21,351
State net operating loss carryforwards4,095
 3,845
Goodwill and other intangibles, net1,590
 2,814
Occupancy costs5,863
 7,460
Tax credit carryforwards24,982
 21,987
Accrued vacation benefits1,851
 2,560
Accrued workers compensation1,141
 1,490
Accumulated other comprehensive income-postretirement benefits326
 499
Other1,706
 2,131
Other deferred income tax assetsOther deferred income tax assets4,345 4,690 
Gross deferred income tax assets64,009
 70,959
Gross deferred income tax assets300,704 298,763 
Less: Valuation allowance
 
Less: Valuation allowance(13,138)
Net deferred income tax assets$64,009
 $70,959
Total deferred income tax assetsTotal deferred income tax assets$287,566 $298,763 
   
Deferred income tax liabilities:   
Deferred income tax liabilities: 
Inventory and other reserves(116) (97)
Operating right-of-use assetsOperating right-of-use assets(205,897)(208,804)
Property and equipment depreciation(15,701) (17,599)Property and equipment depreciation(26,056)(29,685)
Franchise rights(20,545) (24,422)Franchise rights(65,329)(66,725)
Accumulated other comprehensive income-postretirement benefitsAccumulated other comprehensive income-postretirement benefits(474)(280)
Other deferred income tax liabilitiesOther deferred income tax liabilities(1,172)(252)
Total deferred income tax liabilities$(36,362) $(42,118)Total deferred income tax liabilities(298,928)(305,746)
   
Carrying value of net deferred income tax assets$27,647
 $28,841
Net long-term deferred income tax liabilitiesNet long-term deferred income tax liabilities$(11,362)$(6,983)
The Company's federal net operating loss carryforwards generated prior to December 31, 2017 expire beginning in 2033. Federal net operating losses generated subsequent to 2017 have no expiration date. As of December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $84.4 million.$136.7 million and approximately $7.6 million in state net operating loss carryforwards. The Company's state net operating loss carryforwards expire beginning in 20182021 through 2036.
In 2014, the Company recorded a valuation allowance on all of its net deferred tax assets. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company evaluated evidence to consider the reversal of the valuation allowance on its net deferred income tax assets and determined in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 that there was sufficient positive evidence to conclude that it is more likely than not its deferred income tax assets are realizable. In determining the likelihood of future realization of the deferred income tax assets as of January 1, 2017, the Company considered both positive and negative evidence and weighted the effect of such evidence based upon its objectivity as required by ASC 740. As a result, the Company believed that the weight of the positive evidence, including the cumulative income position in the three most recent years as of January 1, 2017 (as adjusted for non-recurring items and permanent differences between book and tax) and forecasts for a sustained level of future taxable income, was sufficient to overcome the weight of the negative evidence, and recorded a $30.4 million tax benefit to release the full valuation allowance against the Company's deferred income tax assets in the fourth quarter of 2016.2038.
The Company has performed the required assessment of positive and negative evidence regarding the realization of deferred income tax assets in accordance with ASC 740 at January 3, 2021 and December 31, 2017.29, 2019. Under ASC 740, the weight given to negative and positive evidence is commensurate only to the extent that such evidence can be objectively verified. ASC 740 prescribes that objective historical evidence, in particular the Company’s three-year cumulative loss position at January 3, 2021, be given a greater weight than subjective evidence, including the Company’s forecast of future taxable income, which include assumptions that cannot be objectively verified. In determining the likelihood of
CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 2016
(In thousands of dollars except share and per share amounts)


future realization of the deferred income tax assets as of January 3, 2021 and December 31, 2017,29, 2019 the Company considered both positive and negative evidence and weighted the effect of such evidence based upon it'sits objectivity. The Company believes thatBased on the required weight of evidence under ASC 740, as of January 3, 2021 the positive evidence, including the cumulativeCompany determined that a valuation allowance was needed for certain federal income positiontax credits in the three most recent years (asamount of $13.1 million as they may expire prior to their utilization by the Company. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be adjusted for non-recurring items and permanent differences between book and tax) and forecasts for a sustained levelif estimates of future taxable income is sufficient to overcome during
F- 27

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
the weight of thecarryforward period are reduced or increased or if objective negative evidence in the form of cumulative losses is no longer present and concludes that it does not needadditional weight may be given to record a valuation allowance against its deferredsubjective evidence such as projections for growth. The company recorded income tax assets.expense of $13.1 million in fiscal 2020 relative to this valuation reserve.
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax provision to the income tax provision (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017, and January 3, 20162021, December 29, 2019, and December 30, 2018 was as follows:
Year ended
Year ended January 3, 2021December 29, 2019December 30, 2018
December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
Statutory federal income tax provision$2,717
 $6,085
 $1
Statutory federal income tax provision (benefit)Statutory federal income tax provision (benefit)$(4,865)$(9,249)$2,089 
State income taxes, net of federal benefit572
 403
 6
State income taxes, net of federal benefit(726)(1,655)325 
Change in valuation allowance
 (30,374) 2,959
Employment tax credits(1,947) (5,408) (2,710)Employment tax credits(2,585)(2,938)(3,059)
Change in valuation allowancesChange in valuation allowances13,138 
Non-deductible expenses336
 965
 
Non-deductible expenses214 1,374 415 
Federal rate change(762) 
 
Stock-based compensationStock-based compensation525 308 (53)
Rate changeRate change312 
Miscellaneous(312) 244
 (256)Miscellaneous281 37 126 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes$604
 $(28,085) $
Provision (benefit) for income taxes$6,294 $(12,123)$(157)
The Company's policy is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. At January 3, 2021 and December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017,29, 2019, the Company had no0 unrecognized tax benefits and no0 accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions. The tax years 20132014 - 20172020 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject. Although it is not reasonably possible to estimate the amount by which unrecognized tax benefits may increase within the next twelve months due to uncertainties regarding the timing of examinations, the Company does not expect unrecognized tax benefits to significantly change in the next twelve months.
On December 22, 2017,March 27, 2020, the United States enacted the CARES Act as a response to the economic uncertainty resulting from COVID-19. The CARES Act includes modifications for net operating loss carryovers and carrybacks, limitations of business interest expense for tax, immediate refund of alternative minimum tax (AMT) credit carryovers as well as a technical correction to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Act") was signed into law. Theof 2017, referred to herein as the U.S. Tax Act, reduces the corporate tax rate to 21% from 35% while retaining the employment tax creditsfor qualified improvement property. As of January 3, 2021, the Company is eligible for. In addition,expects that the Act provides for one hundred percent expensingcarryback of certain qualified property placed in service after September 27, 2017.net operating losses will not have an impact on its current tax attributes.
The Company recorded a $0.8 million discrete tax benefit in the fourth quarter to remeasure its net deferred taxes due to the lowering of the Federal income tax statutory rate to 21% under the Act. The measurement of general business credits, which are a large component of offsetting deferred tax assets, was not affected by the Act with the exception of making a final determination on whether or not to opt out of the one hundred percent expensing provision.
11. Stock-Based Compensation
2016 Stock Incentive Plan. In 2016, the Company adopted a stock plan entitled the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”) and reserved and authorized a total of 4,000,000 shares of common stock for grant thereunder. As of December 31, 2017, 3,655,065January 3, 2021, 887,171 shares were available for future grant or issuance.
Stock-based compensation expense for the years ended January 3, 2021, December 29, 2019, and December 30, 2018 was $5.2 million, $5.8 million and $5.8 million, respectively. As of January 3, 2021, the total remaining stock-based compensation expense relating to non-vested shares and stock options was approximately $7.7 million and the remaining weighted average vesting period for non-vested shares and stock options was 4.0 years.
Non-vested Shares
During the year ended January 3, 2021, the Company granted 790,000 non-vested shares of common stock to certain employees and officers of the Company and 73,128 non-vested shares to outside directors of the Company. These shares vest over their three-year vesting period, provided the participant has continuously remained an employee, officer, or director of the Company.
F- 28

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
On January 15, 2017,2019, the Company granted 340,000417,500 non-vested shares of common stock to certain employees and officers of the Company and 47,470 non-vested shares to outside directors of the Company. These shares vest over their three-year vesting period, provided the participant has continuously remained an employee, officer, or director of the Company. In September of 2019, the Company granted 10,000 non-vested shares of common stock to an interim officer of the Company, which vested in May 2020.
On January 15, 2018, the Company granted 350,000 non-vested shares of common stock to officers of the Company. These shares vest over their three-yearthree-year vesting period. In addition, during 2017During 2018 the Company also issued an aggregate of 26,58030,192 non-vested shares of common stock to non-employee directors. The non-vested stockshare awards vest over three years, provided that the participant has continuously remained a director of the Company.
CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 2016
(In thousands of dollars except share and per share amounts)


2006 Stock Incentive Plan. In 2006, the Company adopted a stock plan entitled the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, (the “2006 Plan”) and reserved and authorized a total of 3,300,000 shares of common stock for grant thereunder. On June 9, 2011, the stockholders approved an amendment to the 2006 Plan increasing the number of shares of common stock available for issuance by an additional 1,000,000 shares. The 2006 Plan expired in 2016 and no shares are available for future grant or issuance under this plan.
On January 15, 2016, the Company granted 319,000non-vested shares of stock to officers of the Company. These shares vest , become non-forfeitable and are being expensed over their four-year vesting period. In addition, during 2016 the Company issued an aggregate of 8,140 non-vested shares of common stock to non-employee directors. The non-vested stock awards vest over five years, provided that the participant has continuously remained a director of the Company.
Stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017, and January 3, 2016 was $3.5 million, $2.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively.
A summary of all non-vested common share activity for the year ended December 31, 2017January 3, 2021 was as follows:
SharesWeighted Average Grant Date Price
Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Price
Nonvested at January 1, 2017577,221
 $10.42
Non-vested at December 29, 2019Non-vested at December 29, 2019790,823 $11.35 
Granted366,580
 15.05
Granted863,128 $5.42 
Vested(177,673) 9.87
Vested(416,253)$12.07 
Forfeited(43,669) 12.84
Forfeited(69,850)$6.24 
Nonvested at December 31, 2017722,459
 $12.76
Non-vested at January 3, 2021Non-vested at January 3, 20211,167,848 $7.02 
The fair value of the non-vested shares is based on the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. As of December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, the total non-vested stock-based compensation expense relating to non-vested shares and stock options was approximately $6.1$7.7 million and the remaining weighted average vesting period for non-vested shares and stock options was 1.94.0 years.
Stock Options
During the twelve months ended January 3, 2021, the Company granted in the aggregate options to purchase 1,075,000 shares of its common stock, consisting of 739,340 shares of non-qualified stock options and 335,660 shares of incentive stock options (“ISOs”) to certain employees and officers of the Company. These options become exercisable and are being expensed over their three-year vesting period. The options expire seven years from the date of the grant and were issued with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the stock price, or $7.12 per share of common stock, on the date of grant.
The following assumptions were used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock option awards at the grant date:
2020
Risk-free interest rate0.21 %
Expected term (in years)4.5
Expected volatility65.10 %
Expected dividend yield%
Fair Value$3.65 
Expected term represents the period that the stock option awards were expected to be outstanding. Given the Company has not issued stock options since 2010, it concluded that its stock option exercise history did not provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term and therefore used the simplified method to determine the expected term of this stock option grant. This method bases the expected term calculation on the average of the vesting term and the contractual term of the awards. The risk-free interest rate was based on the yield of constant maturity U.S. treasury bonds with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the awards. There was no
F- 29

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
expected dividend yield. The Company estimated the stock price volatility using weekly price observations over the most recent historical period equal to the expected life of the awards.
A summary of all stock option activity for the year ended January 3, 2021 was as follows:
OptionsWeighted Average Exercise PriceAverage Remaining Contractual LifeAggregate Intrinsic Value (1)
Options outstanding at December 29, 2019
Granted1,075,000 $7.12 
Forfeited(25,000)$7.12 
Options Outstanding at January 3, 20211,050,000 $7.12 6.6$
Vested or expected to vest at January 3, 20211,050,000 $7.12 6.6$
Options exercisable at January 3, 2021
(1) The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated using the difference between the market price of the Company's common stock at January 3, 2021 of $6.28 and the grant date exercise price for only those awards that have a grant date exercise price that is less than the market price of the Company's common stock at January 3, 2021. There were no awards having a grant date exercise price less than the market price of the Company's common stock at January 3, 2021.
Restricted Stock Units
The Company has issued restricted stock units (“RSUs”) on shares of the Company's common shares to certain eligible employees. The RSUs generally vest in equal installments over three years. During the twelve months ended January 3, 2021, 20,486 RSUs vested into shares of the Company's common stock at a weighted average price of $2.92 per share.
A summary of all RSU activity for the year ended January 3, 2021 was as follows:
Units
Non-vested at December 29, 201957,942 
Vested(20,486)
Non-vested at January 3, 202137,456 
12. Stockholders' Equity
Preferred Stock. In 2012, Carrols Restaurant Group issued to BKC 100 shares of the Company's Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the "Series A Convertible Preferred Stock") pursuant to a certificate of designation. These shares arewere convertible into 9,414,580 shares of Carrols Restaurant Group Common Stock ("Carrols Common Stock"). In 2018, Carrols Restaurant Group, BKC and Blue Holdco 1, LLC ("Blue Holdco" and together with BKC, the "BKC Stockholders") exchanged the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock for Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the "Series B Convertible Preferred Stock"), with substantially the same powers, preferences and rights of the shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, except to provide that such shares will be transferable by the BKC Stockholders solely to certain of its affiliates or subsidiaries.
The Series B Convertible Preferred Stock ranks senior to Carrols Common Stock with respect to rights on liquidation, winding-up and dissolution of Carrols Restaurant Group. The Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is perpetual, will receive any dividends and amounts upon a liquidation event on an as converted basis, does not pay interest and has no mandatory prepayment features.
The BKC Stockholders also hashave certain approval and voting rights as set forth in the certificate of designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock so long as it ownsthey own greater than 10.0%7.5% of the outstanding shares of Carrols Common Stock (on an as-converted basis). The Series B Convertible Preferred Stock will vote with the Company's common stockCommon Stock on an as converted basis and provides for the right of the BKC Stockholders to elect (a) two
F- 30

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2 members to the Company's boardBoard of directorsDirectors until the date on which the number of shares of common stock into which the outstanding shares of theSeries B Convertible Preferred Stock held by the BKC stockholders are then convertible constitutes less than 14.5%11.5% of the total number of outstanding shares of common stockthe Company's Common Stock and (b) one1 member to the Company's boardBoard of directorsDirectors until the BKC ownsStockholders own Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (on an as converted basis) of less than 10.0%7.5% of the total number of outstanding shares of the Company's Common Stock.
In connection with the Cambridge Merger, Cambridge Holdings was issued 10,000 shares of the Company's Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (the " Series C Convertible Preferred Stock") that was automatically converted during the third quarter of 2019 into approximately 7.5 million shares of the Company's Common Stock when such conversion was approved by the Company's stockholders at the Company's annual stockholders meeting on August 29, 2019. With the conversion of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in the third quarter of 2019, as of January 3, 2021 Cambridge Holdings beneficially owns approximately 23.9% of the Company's Common Stock after giving effect to the conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock.
Stock Repurchase Program. On August 2, 2019, the Company's Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase plan ("Repurchase Program") under which the Company may repurchase up to $25.0 million of its outstanding common stock. The authorization became effective August 2, 2019, and will expire 24 months thereafter, unless terminated earlier by the Company's Board of Directors. Purchases under the Repurchase Program may be made from time to time in open market transactions at prevailing market prices or in privately negotiated transactions (including, without limitation, the use of Rule 10b5-1 plans) in compliance with applicable federal securities laws, including Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company has no obligation to repurchase stock under the Repurchase Program, and the timing, actual number and value of shares purchased will depend on the Company's stock price, trading volume, general market and economic conditions, and other factors.
During the twelve months ended January 3, 2021, the Company repurchased in open market transactions 1,534,304 shares of the Company's Common Stock at an average share price of $6.52 for a total cost of $10.0 million under the Repurchase Program.
During the twelve months ended December 29, 2019, the Company repurchased in open market transactions 553,112 shares of the Company's Common Stock at an average share price of $7.26 for a total cost of $4.0 million under the Repurchase Program.
At January 3, 2021, $11.0 million was available to repurchase shares under the Repurchase Program. Shares repurchased are being held in treasury until they are retired at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
13. Net Income (Loss) per Share
The Company applies the two-class method to calculate and present net income (loss) per share. The Company's non-vested restricted share awards and Series AB Convertible Preferred Stock issued toheld by the BKC Stockholders contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends and are considered participating securities for purposes of computing net income per share pursuant to the two-class method. Under the two-class method, net earnings are reduced by the amount of dividends declared (whether paid or unpaid) and the remaining undistributed earnings are then allocated to common stock and participating securities, based on their respective rights to receive dividends.
CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 2016
(In thousands of dollars except share and per share amounts)


Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholdersstockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the reporting period. Diluted net income (loss) per share reflects additional shares of common stock outstanding, where applicable, calculated using the treasury stock method or the two-class method.
F- 31

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:
 Year ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
Basic net income per share:     
Net income$7,159
 $45,472
 $4
Less: Income attributable to non-vested shares(118) (616) 
Less: Income attributable to preferred stock(1,479) (9,461) (1)
Net income available to common stockholders$5,562
 $35,395
 $3
Weighted average common shares outstanding35,416,531
 35,178,329
 34,958,847
Basic net income per share$0.16
 $1.01
 $0.00
Diluted net income per share:     
Net income$7,159
 $45,472
 $4
Shares used in computing basic net income per share35,416,531
 35,178,329
 34,958,847
Dilutive effect of preferred stock and non-vested shares9,559,983
 9,673,016
 9,664,404
Shares used in computing diluted net income per share44,976,514
 44,851,345
 44,623,251
Diluted net income per share (1)$0.16
 $1.01
 $0.00
 Year ended
 January 3, 2021December 29, 2019December 30, 2018
Basic net income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss)$(29,463)$(31,919)$10,104 
Less: Income attributable to non-vested shares(178)
Less: Income attributable to preferred stock(2,071)
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders$(29,463)$(31,919)$7,855 
Weighted average common shares outstanding50,751,185 43,421,715 35,715,372 
Basic net income (loss) per share$(0.58)$(0.74)$0.22 
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss)$(29,463)$(31,919)$10,104 
Weighted average common shares outstanding50,751,185 43,421,715 35,715,372 
Dilutive effect of preferred stock and non-vested shares9,604,599 
Dilutive weighted average common shares outstanding50,751,185 43,421,715 45,319,971 
Diluted net income (loss) per share (1)$(0.58)$(0.74)$0.22 
Shares excluded from diluted net income (loss) per share computations (2)9,615,435 11,484,159 
 
(1)Diluted net income per share is equal to basic net income per share for the periods presented due to the allocation of earnings to participating securities under the two-class method of calculating basic net income per share causing basic net income per share to be lower than diluted net income per share calculated under the treasury-stock method.
(1)Diluted net income (loss) per share is equal to basic net income (loss) per share for the periods presented due to the allocation of earnings to participating securities under the two-class method of calculating basic net income (loss) per share causing basic net income (loss) per share to be lower than diluted net income (loss) per share calculated under the treasury-stock method.
(2)Shares issuable upon conversion of preferred stock and non-vested shares were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
14. Commitments and Contingencies
Lease Guarantees. Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc ("Fiesta"), a former wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, was spun-off in 2012 to the Company's stockholders. As of December 31, 2017,January 3, 2021, the Company is a guarantor under 2718 Fiesta restaurant property leases, of which all but 2 of those restaurants are still operating with lease terms expiring on various dates through 2030, and is the primary lessee on five Fiesta restaurant property leases, which it subleases to Fiesta.2030. The Company is fully liable for all obligations under the terms of the leases in the event that Fiesta fails to pay any sums due under the lease, subject to indemnification provisions of the Separation and Distribution Agreement entered into in connection with the spin-off of Fiesta.
The maximum potential amount of future undiscounted rental payments the Company could be required to make under these leases at December 31, 2017January 3, 2021 was $20.3$13.6 million. The obligations under these leases will generally continue to decrease over time as these operating leases expire. Noexpire, other than execution of option renewals that exist under the original leases. NaN payments related to these guarantees have been made by the Company to date and none are expected to be required to be made in the future. The Company has not recorded a liability for these guarantees in accordance with ASC 460 - Guarantees as Fiesta has indemnified the Company for all such obligations and the Company did not believe it was probable it would be required to perform under any of the guarantees or direct obligations.
Litigation. On August 21, 2012 Alan Vituli, the Company's former chairman and chief executive officer, filed an action in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware ( the “Court”) against the Company and Carrols. On July 29, 2016 the Company, Carrols, and Mr. Vituli agreed to fully resolve all of Mr. Vituli’s claims in the lawsuit for a total payment by the Company of $2.0 million. Upon the execution of releases and payment of the settlement amount, the litigation was dismissed. Net of a contribution from the Company's insurance carrier, $1.85 millionis included in other
CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 2016
(In thousands of dollars except share and per share amounts)


income (expense) in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the year ended January 1, 2017.
The Company is a party to various other litigation matters that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that the outcomeultimate resolution of any of these other matters will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial statements.
F- 32

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

15. Transactions with Related Parties
In connection with an acquisition of restaurants from BKC in 2012, the Company issued to BKC 100 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, which was exchanged for 100 shares of newly issued Series B Convertible Preferred Stock in 2018, and as of December 31, 2017January 3, 2021 is convertible into approximately 20.7%15.2% of the outstanding shares of the Company's common stock on a fully diluted basis.after giving effect to the conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. See Note 12—Stockholder's Equity for further information. Pursuant to the terms of the Series AB Convertible Preferred Stock, the BKC also has twoStockholders are entitled to elect 2 representatives on the Company's boardBoard of directors.Directors.
EachThe Company operates its Burger King® restaurants under franchise agreements with BKC and its Popeyes® restaurants under franchise agreements with Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc. ("PLK"), a subsidiary of the Company's restaurants operates under a separate franchise agreement with BKC.RBI. These franchise agreements generally provide for an initial term of twenty years and currently have an initial franchise fee of $50. Any$50,000. With BKC's and PLK's respective approval, the Company can elect to extend franchise agreement, including renewals, can be extended at the Company's discretionagreements for an additional 20 year term, with BKC's approval,terms, provided that among other things, the restaurant meets the current Burger Kingrestaurant image standard and the Company is not in default under terms of the franchise agreement. In addition to the initial franchise fee, the Company generally pays BKC a monthly royalty at a rate of 4.5% of Burger King sales and Popeyes a weekly royalty at a rate of 5.0% of Popeyes sales. Royalty expense was $46.4$67.2 million, $40.0$62.0 million, and $36.2$50.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016,2021, December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018, respectively.
The Company is also generally required to contribute 4% of restaurant sales from the Company's restaurants to anthe advertising fundfunds utilized by BKC and PLK for itstheir advertising, promotional programs and public relations activities, and amounts for additional local advertising in markets that approve such advertising. Advertising expense associated with these expenditures was $43.5$59.3 million, $40.2$56.7 million and $32.0$47.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016,2021, December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018, respectively.
As of December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017, and January 3, 2016,2021, December 29, 2019, and December 30, 2018, the Company leased 251, 275232, 248 and 293244 of its restaurant locations from BKC, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, for 125 of the restaurants,January 3, 2021, the terms and conditions of the leaseleases with BKC are identical to those between BKC and their third-party lessor.lessor for 101 of the restaurants. Aggregate rent under these BKC leases for the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 20162021, December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018 was $27.6$25.9 million, $27.8$27.4 million, and $28.4$27.2 million, respectively. The Company believes the related partydoes not believe that such lease terms have not been significantly affected by the fact that the Company and BKC are deemed to be related parties.
As of January 3, 2021 and December 31, 2017,29, 2019, the Company owed BKC $7.5$14.7 million and $11.5 million respectively, related to the payment of advertising, royalties, rent and rent,real estate taxes, which is normally remitted on a monthly basis. These costs are included in accounts payable, other current liabilities, prepaid rent and accrued real estate taxes on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The Company and BKC entered into an Area Development and Remodeling Agreement ("Area Development Agreement") commencing on April 30, 2019 and ending on September 30, 2024, which superseded the Operating Agreement dated as of May 30, 2012, as amended, between Carrols LLC and BKC. Pursuant to the Area Development Agreement, BKC assigned its right of first refusal under its franchise agreements with its franchisees to purchase all of the assets of a Burger King restaurant on the same terms proposed between such franchisee and a third party purchaser (the “ADA ROFR”), in 16 states and a limited number of counties in 4 additional states, and granted franchise pre-approval to acquire Burger King restaurants until the date that Carrols LLC has acquired more than an aggregate of an additional 500 Burger King restaurants excluding those restaurants the Company acquired in the Cambridge Merger. Carrols LLC agreed to pay BKC $3.0 million for the ADA ROFR in four equal installment payments over the course of one year. The ADA was amended and restated on January 4, 2021 (see Note 18) and an impairment charge was recorded during the year ended January 3, 2021 for the remaining value of the ADA ROFR (see Note 5).
The Company assumed Cambridge's development agreement for Popeyes®, which includes a right of first refusal for acquisitions in 2 southern states, as well as a development commitment to open, build and operate approximately 80 new Popeyes® restaurants over six years. The continued assignment of this Popeyes® right of
F- 33

CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 3, 2021, DECEMBER 29, 2019 AND DECEMBER 30, 2018
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

first refusal is subject to suspension at Popeyes® discretion in the event of non-compliance by the Company with certain terms set forth in this development agreement.
The Company received $1.9 million related to a settlement with BKC for their approval of new restaurant development by other franchisees which unfavorably impacted the Company's restaurants which was recorded as other income in 2019 (see Note 9).
16. Retirement Plans
The Company offers its salaried employees the option to participate in the Carrols Corporation Retirement Savings Plan (the “Retirement Plan”). The Retirement Plan includes a savings option pursuant to section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code in addition to a post-tax savings option. Participating employees may contribute up to 50% of their salary annually to either of the savings options, subject to other limitations. The employees may allocate their contributions to various investment options available under a trust established by the Retirement Plan. The Company may elect to contribute to the Retirement Plan on an annual basis. The Company's contribution is equal to 50% of the employee's contribution subject to a maximum annual amount and begins to vest after one year of service and fully vests after five years of service. A year of service is defined as a plan year during which an employee completes at least 1,000 hours of service. Expense recognized for the Company's contributions to the Retirement Plan was $615, $496$1.9 million, $1.4 million and $463$0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, January 1, 2017 and January 3, 2016,2021, December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018, respectively.

The Company also has an Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan which permits employees not eligible to participate in the Retirement Plan because they have been excluded as “highly compensated” employees (as so defined in the Retirement Plan) to voluntarily defer portions of their base salary and annual bonus. All amounts
CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 2016
(In thousands of dollars except share and per share amounts)


deferred by the participants earn interest at 8% per annum. There is no0 Company matching on any portion of the funds. At January 3, 2021 and December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017,29, 2019, a total of $3,053$4.4 million and $1,756,$3.9 million, respectively, was deferred under this plan, including accrued interest.
17. Postretirement Benefits
The Company sponsors a postretirement medical and life insurance plan covering substantially all administrative and restaurant management personnel who retire or terminate after qualifying for such benefits.
The following was the plan status and accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO) at December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017:
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
Change in benefit obligation:   
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$4,566
 $3,060
Service cost192
 150
Interest cost191
 165
Plan participants' contributions88
 98
Actuarial loss (gain)(122) 1,251
Benefits paid(115) (164)
Medicare part D prescription drug subsidy38
 6
Benefit obligation at end of year$4,838
 $4,566
Change in plan assets: 
  
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year$
 $
Employer contributions (refund)(11) 60
Plan participants' contributions88
 98
Benefits paid(115) (164)
Medicare part D prescription drug subsidy38
 6
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
 
Funded status$(4,838) $(4,566)
Weighted average assumptions: 
  
Discount rate used to determine benefit obligations3.60% 4.11%
Discount rate used to determine net periodic benefit cost4.11% 4.25%
The discount rateinterest, which is determined based on high-quality fixed income investments that match the duration of expected retiree medical and life insurance benefits. The Company has typically used the corporate AA/Aa bond rate for this assumption. The actuarial lossincluded in 2016 was due primarily to the Company utilizing updated actuarial data affecting the Medicare Part D prescription drug subsidy.
Components of net periodic postretirement benefit income recognized in the consolidated statements of operations were:
 Year ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
Service cost$192
 $150
 $127
Interest cost191
 165
 114
Amortization of net gains and losses222
 197
 163
Amortization of prior service credit(355) (355) (355)
Net periodic postretirement benefit expense$250
 $157
 $49
CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 2016
(In thousands of dollars except share and per share amounts)


Amounts recognized in accumulatedlong-term other comprehensive income that have not yet been recognized as components of net periodic benefit income, consisted of:
 Year ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
Prior service credit$1,617
 $1,972
Net loss(2,928) (3,272)
Deferred income taxes101
 97
Accumulated other comprehensive loss$(1,210) $(1,203)
The estimated net loss that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic postretirement benefit income over the next fiscal year is $191. The amount of prior service credit for the postretirement benefit plan that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic postretirement benefit income over the next fiscal year is $352.
The following table reflects the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and January 1, 2017:  
 Year ended
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017
Net actuarial loss (gain)$(122) $1,251
Amortization of net loss(222) (197)
Amortization of prior service credit355
 355
Deferred income taxes(4) (541)
Total recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss$7
 $868
Assumed health care cost trend rates at year end were as follows:  
 December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017 January 3, 2016
Medical benefits cost trend rate assumed for the following year pre-657.25% 7.50% 7.75%
Medical benefits cost trend rate assumed for the following year post-656.25% 6.50% 6.75%
Prescription drug benefit cost trend rate assumed for the following year10.50% 10.50% 11.00%
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)3.89% 3.89% 3.89%
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate2075
 2075
 2075
The assumed healthcare cost trend rate represents the Company's estimate of the annual rates of change in the costs of the healthcare benefits currently provided by the Company's postretirement plan. The healthcare cost trend rate implicitly considers estimates of healthcare inflation, changes in healthcare utilization and delivery patterns, technological advances and changes in the health status of the plan participants. Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effectliabilities on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A one-percentage-point change in the health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:  accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
 1% Point Increase 1% Point Decrease
Effect on total of service and interest cost components$112
 $80
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation1,043
 788
CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 2016
(In thousands of dollars except share and per share amounts)


During 2018, the Company expects to contribute approximately $143 to its postretirement benefit plan. The benefits, net of Medicare Part D subsidy receipts, expected to be paid in each year from 2018 through 2022 are $143, $165, $163, $170 and $188 respectively, and for the years 2023-2027 the aggregate amount is $1,126.  
18.17. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
 Year Ended December 31, 2017 
 
First Quarter 
 
Second Quarter  
 Third Quarter Fourth Quarter 
Restaurant sales$239,852
(1)$279,478
(1)$285,235
 $283,967
(1)
Income from operations(1,406)
(1)(2)12,335
(1)(2)8,684
(1)(2)9,860
(1)(2)
Net income(5,596)
 6,039
 2,795
 3,921
 
Basic and diluted net income per share(0.16) 0.13
 0.06
 0.09
 
Restaurants at end of period788
 799
 798
 807
 
   
 Year Ended January 1, 2017 
 First Quarter   Second Quarter   Third Quarter Fourth Quarter 
Restaurant sales$222,519
(3)$241,368
(3)$238,870
(3)$240,826
(3)
Income from operations6,680
(3)(4)13,896
(3)(4)9,049
(3)(4)6,077
(3)(4)
Net income2,145
 9,376
 4,489
 29,462
(5)
Basic and diluted net income per share0.05
 0.21
 0.10
 0.65
 
Restaurants at end of period717
 723
 734
 753
(6)
 Year Ended January 3, 2021
 
First Quarter 
Second Quarter  
Third QuarterFourth Quarter (1)
Restaurant sales$351,518 (2)$368,418 (2)$407,036 $420,530 
Income (loss) from operations(22,047)(3)14,302(3)10,228(3)1,631(3)
Net income (loss)(22,209)7,8423,531(18,627)(4)
Basic and diluted net loss per share(0.44)0.13 0.06 (0.37)
Restaurants open at end of period1,093 1,092 1,088 1,074 
 Year Ended December 29, 2019
 First Quarter  Second Quarter  Third QuarterFourth Quarter
Restaurant sales$290,789 (5)$365,674 (5)$398,414 $397,639 
Income (loss) from operations(5,168)(5)(6)2,103(5)(6)(1,115)(5)(6)(4,563)(5)(6)
Net loss(11,469)(3,732)(6,812)(9,906)
Basic and diluted net loss per share(0.32)(0.09)(0.15)(0.20)
Restaurants open at end of period845 1,081 1,088 1,101 
 
(1)In fiscal 2017 the Company acquired 43 restaurants in the first quarter, 17 restaurants in the second quarter, and four restaurants in the fourth quarter (See Note 2). In fiscal 2017 the Company recorded acquisition costs related to the 2017 and 2016 acquisitions of $0.7 million in the first quarter, $0.5 million in the second quarter, $0.5 million in the third quarter and $0.1 million in the fourth quarter (See Note 2).
(2)
In fiscal 2017 the Company recorded impairment and other lease charges of $0.5 million in the first quarter, $0.4 million in the second quarter, $1.0 million in the third quarter and $0.8 million in the fourth quarter (See Note 5). Also in fiscal 2016, the Company recorded a gain of $0.5 millionrelated to a settlement for a partial condemnation on one of its operating restaurant properties in the first quarter, expense of $1.85 million related to the settlement of litigation with its former Chairman and CEO in the second quarter (see Note 14), a gain of $0.5 million related to property insurance recoveries from a fire at one of its restaurants in the second quarter and a gain of $0.7 million related to property insurance recoveries from a fire at one of its restaurants in the fourth quarter (see Note 9).
(3)In fiscal 2016 the Company acquired twelve restaurants in the first quarter, six restaurants in the second quarter, eleven restaurants in the third quarter and 27 restaurants in the fourth quarter (See Note 2). In fiscal 2016 the Company recorded acquisition costs of $0.4 million in the first quarter, $0.2 million in the second quarter, $0.5 million in the third quarter and $0.8 million in the fourth quarter (See Note 2).
(4)In fiscal 2016 the Company recorded impairment and other lease charges of $0.2 million in the first quarter, $0.3 million in the second quarter, $0.7 million in the third quarter and $1.2 million in the fourth quarter (See Note 5).
(5)In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $30.4 related to the reversal of the valuation allowance previously recorded on all of the Company's net deferred tax assets (See Note 10).
(6)The Company closed nine restaurants at the end of the fourth quarter of 2016.

(1)The fourth quarter of 2020 includes an extra week (see footnote 1)

(2)In the first and second quarters of 2020, the Company's sales were impacted by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Restaurant sales during the last two weeks of March and first two weeks of April showed approximately 30% declines in




CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARYF- 34

SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, JANUARY 1, 2017 AND JANUARY 3, 2016
(In thousands of dollars)

comparable sales. The declines began easing mid-April and throughout May, with a return to positive changes in comparable restaurant sales for the month of June.
(3)In fiscal 2020, the Company recorded impairment and other lease charges of $2.9 million in the first quarter, $2.9 million in the second quarter, $2.0 million in the third quarter and $5.0 million in the fourth quarter. The fourth quarter of 2020 included a $2.0 million charge related to the ROFR termination (See Note 5).
(4)In the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company recorded a valuation allowance on certain of its tax credits of $12.9 million (see Note 10).
(5)In fiscal 2019, the Company acquired 233 restaurants in the second quarter in two separate transactions and 1 restaurant in the third quarter (See Note 2). In fiscal 2019 the Company recorded acquisition and integration costs related to the 2019 acquisitions of $2.6 million in the first quarter, $2.6 million in the second quarter, $2.8 million in the third quarter and $2.8 million in the fourth quarter (See Note 2).
(6)In fiscal 2019, the Company recorded impairment and other lease charges of $0.9 million in the first quarter, $0.4 million in the second quarter, $0.5 million in the third quarter and $1.8 million in the fourth quarter (See Note 5).
18. Subsequent Events
Subsequent Events. On January 4, 2021, the Company amended and restated its existing Area Development Agreement (See Note 15).
Pursuant to the ADA and for a cost of $3.0 million, BKC had assigned to Carrols LLC the right of first refusal on the sale of franchisee-operated restaurants in 16 states and a limited number of counties in 4 additional states, and granted franchise pre-approval to acquire Burger King restaurants until the date that we have acquired more than an aggregate of an additional 500 Burger King restaurants excluding those restaurants we acquired in the Cambridge Acquisition ("ADA ROFR"). The ADA ROFR was terminated in connection with the Amended ADA.
On October 1 of each year following the commencement date of the ADA, Carrols LLC had been required to pay BKC certain pre-paid franchise fees to be applied to new Burger King restaurants opened and operated by Carrols LLC. The Amended ADA eliminated the requirement for any prepayments due and payable on and after October 1, 2020, and the $0.6 million balance of prepaid franchise fees paid under the ADA that had not yet been applied to new restaurant development was forfeited.
Pursuant to the Amended ADA, Carrols LLC has agreed to open, build and operate a total of 50 new Burger King restaurants, 80% of which must be in Kentucky, Tennessee and Indiana. This includes 4 Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2021, 10 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2022, 12 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2023, 12 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2024 and 12 additional Burger King restaurants by September 30, 2025.
In addition, pursuant to the Amended ADA, BKC granted Carrols LLC franchise pre-approval to build new Burger King restaurants or acquire Burger King restaurants from Burger King franchisees with respect to 500 Burger King restaurants in the aggregate in (i) Kentucky, Tennessee and Indiana (excluding certain geographic areas in Indiana) and (ii) (a) 16 states, which include Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont and Virginia (subject to certain exceptions for certain limited geographic areas within certain states) and (b) any other geographic locations that Carrols LLC enters after the commencement date of the Amended ADA pursuant to BKC procedures subject to certain limitations.

F- 35
  Column B Column C Column D Column E
Description Balance at Beginning of Period Charged to Costs and Expenses Charged to other accounts Deductions Balance at End of Period
Year Ended December 31, 2017          
Deferred income tax valuation allowance $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Year Ended January 1, 2017          
Deferred income tax valuation allowance 30,374
 
 
 (30,374) 
Year Ended January 3, 2016          
Deferred income tax valuation allowance 27,423
 2,959
 (8) 
 30,374





SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 14th11th day of March 2018.2021.
 
CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
/s/ Daniel T. Accordino
(Signature)
Daniel T. Accordino

Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Daniel T. AccordinoPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of DirectorsMarch 11, 2021
Daniel T. Accordino
/s/ Anthony E. HullVice President, Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerMarch 11, 2021
Anthony E. Hull
/s/ Hannah S. CravenDirectorMarch 11, 2021
Hannah S. Craven
/s/ Deborah M. DerbyDirectorMarch 11, 2021
Deborah M. Derby
/s/ Matthew DunniganDirectorMarch 11, 2021
Matthew Dunnigan
/s/ Christopher L. FinazzoDirectorMarch 11, 2021
Christopher L. Finazzo
/s/ Lawrence E. HyattDirectorMarch 11, 2021
Lawrence E. Hyatt
/s/ David S. Harris DirectorMarch 11, 2021
David S. Harris
/s/ Matthew Terker PerelmanDirectorMarch 11, 2021
Matthew Terker Perelman
/s/ Alexander R. SloaneDirectorMarch 11, 2021
Alexander R. Sloane