UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 1)

FORM 10-K

(Mark one)

One)

xTANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTIONAnnual Report Pursuant to Section 13 ORor 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OFof the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

June 30, 2014

or

o¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTIONTransition Report Pursuant to Section 13 ORor 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OFof the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from ___________________________ to _______________


Commission file number 001-12555


File Number: 000-51353

ATRINSIC, INC

INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

 06-1390025
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or
organization)
 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

469 7th          65 Atlantic Avenue, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10018Boston, Massachusetts 02110            


(Address of principal executive offices) (ZIPPrincipal Executive Office)                     (Zip Code)

(212) 716-1977

(

                                (617) 823-2300                               

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)



Telephone Number Including Area Code

Securities registered pursuant tounder Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Title of each class    Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value  The NASDAQ Global Market

None

Securities registered pursuant tounder Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, $0.01$0.000001 par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yeso¨ Nox

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

YesYes ¨o No No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.                     Yes¨ Nox No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website,Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yeso  No xNo


¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.ox


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  ¨
Accelerated filer  ¨
Non-accelerated filer  ¨ (Do(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)

. Yes¨ Yes oNo No x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed usingof the registrant was $800,000 based upon the closing price of $1.34,per share on the OTC Markets Group as of June 30, 2009, was $18,129,060.


Indicate by check mark whetherDecember 31, 2013, the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13, or 15(d)last business day of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes x No o

registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

As of March 24, 2010, the issuer had 20,878,933September 30, 2014, there were 400,000,000 outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock issued and outstanding (which number excludes 2,741,318 shares issued and held in treasury).  

stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.


None 



STATEMENT REGARDING AMENDMENT NO. 1
This Amendment No. 1 to

ATRINSIC INC.

Form 10-K on Form 10-K/A (this “Amendment”) is being filed for the purpose restating Part III of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2010 (the “Original Filing”).

Except as expressly noted herein, this Amendment does not reflect events occurring after the March 31, 2010 filing date of our Original Filing, and we do not undertake to update any item of our Original Filing, except in each case to reflect the changes discussed in this Amendment. Accordingly, this Amendment should be read in conjunction with the Original Filing. As a result of these amendments, we are also filing as exhibits to this Amendment the certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Because no financial statements are contained within this Amendment, we are not including certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



TABLE OF CONTENTS

    
PART IIIPage 
     
Item 10PART IDirectors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance1
     
Item 111. Executive CompensationBusiness 61
Item 1A.Risk Factors13
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments27
Item 2.Properties27
Item 3.Legal Proceedings27
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosure27
PART II     
Item 125. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management andMarket for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
  2127
Item 6.Selected Financial Data28
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations29
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk35
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary DataF-1
Item 9.Changes in and disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure36
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures36
Item 9B.Other Information37
PART III     
Item 1310. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance37
Item 11.Executive Compensation39
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
41
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 2442
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services42
  
Item 14Principal Accounting Fees and Services24
     
PART IV    
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules43
Signatures45

i

EXPLANATORY NOTE

As used in this Report, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “Atrinsic,” or “the Company” refer to Atrinsic, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and/or our majority-owned subsidiary, Momspot, LLC (“Momspot”).

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Except for statements of historical fact, some information in this document contains “forward-looking statements” that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. You can identify these forward-looking statements by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would” or similar words. The statements that contain these or similar words should be read carefully because these statements discuss our future expectations, contain projections of our future results of operations or of our financial position, or state other forward-looking information. We believe that it is important to communicate our future expectations to our investors. However, there may be events in the future that we are not able accurately to predict or control. Further, we urge you to be cautious of the forward-looking statements which are contained in this Annual Report because they involve risks, uncertainties and other factors affecting our operations, market growth, service, products and licenses. The factors listed in the sections captioned “Risk Factors” and “Description of Business,” as well as other cautionary language in this Annual Report and events in the future may cause our actual results and achievements, whether expressed or implied, to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements. The occurrence of any of the events described as risk factors or other future events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial position. Since our common stock is considered a “penny stock” we are ineligible to rely on the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

ii

PART I

Item 1. Business

Overview

Our principal asset is a 51% membership interest in Momspot, which is in the process of developing an online affiliated marketing network targeting the Mommy Market, as more particularly described in this Annual Report. We do not conduct any other business activity, directly or indirectly.

Our goal is to be the premier specialty retail affiliate marketing company targeting women between the ages of 24 and 45 who are either mothers or expecting their first child. We refer to our target audience as the “Mommy Market.” Towards that end, we are in the process of building a website that incorporates various existing technologies that allows for product aggregation and enhanced search and filtering capabilities, resulting in increased brand engagement and user traffic for the hundreds of manufacturers, distributors, retailers and other merchants, whom we refer to as “Platform Partners,” that want to reach the Mommy Market. We will also sell online advertisement space to various businesses (hereafter referred to in this context as “Advertisers”). In many cases, our Platform Partners will also be Advertisers and vice versa. Momspot’s website,www.momspot.com, will function as a vertical search engine and comparison shopping site that will enable mothers and mothers-to-be (hereafter, “Moms” and “Moms-to-be”) to search for and compare thousands of products for themselves and their families from their desktop and lap-top computers and mobile devices. We launched the Momspot website in March 2014.

We will focus on marketing our website and services in order to build to awareness of the Momspot brand, which, we hope, will translate into heavy user traffic and engagement. Ultimately, our value will be a function of the number of people using our website, the number of click-throughs to the web sites of our Platform Partners and Advertisers, and the transactional volume attributable to our users.

Our marketing strategy will focus on Moms and Moms-to-be, not just their babies and children. We will organize our merchandise and content according to what Moms and Moms-to-be will find informative and helpful. Finally, we hope to distinguish our brand as a sophisticated and fashionable comparison shopping tool and social destination for Moms and Moms-to-be, unlike existing Mom-related websites and retailers, whose primary focus is on “cutesy” content having to do with babies, children and general parenting issues.

Although we released the first live version of the Momspot website (v1.0) on March 1, 2014 and the second (v2.0) in May 2014, total revenues to date have been negligible.

Our business model is heavily reliant on marketing in order to achieve the website activity required to become profitable. We estimate 10,000 unique visitors per day to the Momspot website is the minimum amount of activity necessary to produce the revenue required to be a profitable business. In order to achieve this level of activity, we estimate that an annual marketing budget of between $115,000 and $150,000 is required. Moreover, we will need to hire the necessary resources to manage the marketing activities and provide the appropriate level of development and technical support for these activities. At a minimum, we estimate we will need $375,000 in funding over the next 12 months and $750,000 over the next two years in order to achieve profitability as it will take between 12 and 24 months to reach the targeted activity levels.

Our auditors, in their report for the year ended June 30, 2014, included a paragraph that there was substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. This concern was based on our limited amount of working capital, limited revenues and negative cash flows. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, assuming that we will continue as a going concern.

Business Model — Affiliate Marketing

Our business model, affiliate marketing, is a type of performance-based marketing employed by many successful web-based companies, such as Kayak and Google. Affiliate marketing companies do not hold any inventory or buy and/or sell products. Rather, they facilitate interactions between consumers and merchants by creating an environment – i.e., a website – with multiple contact points for consumers, brands, and merchants. Affiliate marketing enhances the connections between consumers, on the one hand, and merchants and brand owners, on the other hand, by allowing for multiple opportunities for consumers to engage with multiple brands and products and services through an affiliate’s (i.e., publisher’s) website. Affiliates, such as Momspot, offer a risk-free approach for merchants and brand owners to increase consumer engagement with their products and brands, drive traffic to their sites and increase transaction volume. Affiliates specialize in product aggregation and search, and focusing marketing efforts on a well-defined and specific market segment (in our case, middle-to-upper class educated mothers between the ages of 24 and 45).

A publisher, also referred to as an affiliate, is an individual or company that promotes multiple products, brands and/or services in exchange for earning a commission. Merchants and brand owners contractually agree to work with a publisher and then provide the publisher with content – in the form of links, product images and banner or text ads – that the publisher incorporates into its website. When a user visits a publisher's website and clicks on a product, service, ad or other form of an advertiser's content, the visitor's browser receives a special tracking cookie that identifies the advertiser, the publisher, and the specific content and commission amount. This data is stored within the link information in what are called "parameters" and can include even more anonymous data used for attribution.

The Market Opportunity

There are three key factors why we believe Momspot presents a good business opportunity:

1.Online advertising and mobile advertising are growing rapidly and search is the most lucrative online business.

2.There is an increasing shift towards performance-based marketing channels, such as affiliate marketing.

3.The enormous size and spending power of a valuable market segment.

Online Advertising Growth1

Internet advertising revenues in the United States totaled $31.7 billion in 2011, an increase of 22% over 2010, and are growing steadily with a compounded annual growth rate of 20.3% over the past ten years. Search remains the largest online advertising revenue format representing 46.5% of 2011 revenues, up from 44.8% in 2010, and in 2011, search revenues totaled $14.8 billion, up almost 27% from $11.7 billion in 2010. We believe our advertising services address the large online and mobile advertising markets. From 2012 to 2017, the worldwide online advertising market, excluding mobile advertising, is projected to increase from $91.1 billion to $124.7 billion, representing a 6.5% compounded annual growth rate, according to industry sources. From 2012 to 2017, the worldwide mobile advertising market is projected to increase from $10.0 billion to $52.2 billion, representing a 39.2% compounded annual growth rate, according to industry sources.

Performance-Based Marketing Growth1

Advertisers are constantly seeking ways to maximize marketing their return on investment through better alternatives to acquire users, generate traffic and increase sales that produces measurable and repeatable results. The result is an increasing trend on the part of advertisers to use targeted, performance-based marketing that consistently and effectively reaches their desired market segment. As such, ad spending on traditional search engines is expected to grow more slowly than overall online ad spending, driving the growth of topical sites that provide a targeted, performance-based marketing alternative grabbing a larger portion of marketing budgets.

According to the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB), online advertising priced on a performance basis represented 62% of total U.S. online advertising spend in 2010, which represents a 20% share gain from cost-per-mille (CPM) and hybrid pricing models since 2004. CPM represents the price per 1000 user impression/views. It does not measure whether any revenue was generated form those views.

Online advertising priced on a performance basis, such as cost-per-click (CPC), has taken significant share from advertising priced on either a per-impression (CPM) or hybrid basis over the last several years, and the IAB expects performance-based online marketing will continue to grow relative to non-performance-based marketing. Performance-based marketing maintains 65% of the Internet advertising market share, or approximately $20.6 billion. This trend is fueled, in part, by the fact that the Internet enables self-directed and targeted marketing. Highly targeted marketing messages will help advertisers tackle the difficulties of reaching certain fragmented audiences.

1. Interactive Advertising Bureau Advertising Revenue Report, 2011

Internet search behaviors are changing as users expect topical search services that produce more relevant search results. In addition, advertisers are seeking more measurable and effective advertising options and the ability to easily target a well-defined market segment, such as the Mommy Market.

The demand by advertisers for performance-based marketing coupled with the increasing demand by users for more topical relevant search and shopping options are changing the nature of search, resulting in the increased popularity and use of performance-based, topical search tools (also known as vertical search engines) that produce relevant results specific to a narrowly defined market segment. Yelp, Kayak, and ShopStyle are just a few examples of these sorts of search alternatives, and how their popularity has grown in the past few years.

The Value of the “Mommy Market”

The “Mommy Market” is estimated to be in excess of 31 million women under the age of 42. This includes 9.9 million “Millennial Moms” (age 18-29) and 21.9 million GenX Moms (age 30-42), two of the more Internet savvy segments.2Digital media is an essential and important part of a Mom’s life today, and the Internet is a rapidly growing media outlet that Moms turn to for information and entertainment. According to America Online DMS, mothers spend up to 16 hours and 52 minutes per week online, which is more than teens (who are online approximately 12 hours and 17 minutes).3According to the same survey, Moms spend an average of 86 minutes per day reading and sending emails and 38% of those surveyed indicated the Internet is their prime source of information, second only to television (48%).4What makes these facts even more interesting is that, when compared to women without children, Moms appear to favor the Internet in many different aspects of their life. Women also tend to seek assistance and opinions from their female peers when making product selection and purchasing decisions.

2 BabyCenter US Mom Market Facts.

3The U.S. Mom Market Report; Silver Stork Research & Packaged Facts, page 56.

4 The U.S. Mom Market Report; Silver Stork Research & Packaged Facts, page 55.

3

Our Value Proposition – To Users

Momspot endeavors to be a new shopping experience - one tailored to the needs of busy and sophisticated women. For users, Momspot will be a topical, one-stop product aggregator and vertical search engine that offers a simple way to find merchandise for the Mom herself and for her children across all age milestones (i.e., new-born, infant, toddler, kids and teens). In addition, we will provide access to special sales and promotions, allow users to interact with one another and curate informative content, all with the goal of enhancing connections with brands and with other similarly situated users. Momspot will leverage key social networking features to facilitate the sharing and promotion of merchandise, and allow users to create their own customized “spot” where they can highlight and promote merchandise they particularly like for other users to view. We will differentiate ourselves from other websites by focusing on the Mom, not just her babies or children. We will organize our merchandise and content according to what, we believe, Mom will find informative and helpful. Our brand will emphasize this fact, and aims to be a sophisticated and fashionable shopping tool and social destination for Moms and Moms-to-be. Ultimately, our goal is to become the number one destination on the Internet for Moms and Moms-to-be by providing them with a simple, stylish and social way to search for, and compare, thousands of products to make finding what they need, for themselves and their families, informative and easy.

Momspot will bring the following value to its users:

·Targeted product search and filtering – search and filtering produces results that are more relevant to the user, saving time and reducing frustration;

·Enhanced search and product selection functionality – our site will allow users to filter by brand, retailer, price, and/or product category, thus producing most relevant results and increasing the likelihood that the user will click-through to the merchants’ site;

·Product aggregation for thousands of merchants and brands that want to reach the Mommy Market – provides the user with a one-stop shopping alternative that does not currently exist for this large market segment;

·Special discounts and promotions –to entice users to the site and to click-through to merchants;

·User community - to entice users to the site and increase user engagement that will increase likelihood of clicking through to merchants;

·Social network integration and ability to solicit real time assistance from friends - to entice users to the site and increase user engagement that will increase likelihood of clicking through to merchants;

·Trusted product reviews and ratings – a value-add for users to entice them to use the site; and

·Ability to customize the user’s personal area for others to follow - to entice users to the site and increase user engagement that will increase likelihood of clicking through to merchants.

Our Value Proposition – To Platform Partners and Advertisers

The value we will create for our users will be enhanced by our Platform Partners and Advertisers. Platform Partners and Advertisers will integrate withwww.momspot.com through an application programing interface (“API”) that we provide which will allow our users to seamlessly move from our website to the websites of our Platform Partners and Advertisers. We will provide our Platform Partners with a set of development tools, APIs and embeddable widgets that will allow them to seamlessly integrate with our platform.

Affiliate marketing companies, such as Momspot, offer a risk-free approach for merchants to increase consumer engagement with their brands, drive traffic to their sites, and increase transaction volumes. Platform Partners will usewww.momspot.com as a complementary distribution channel to expand their reach and engage with their audiences.

We will also offer advertising services via our website to allow our Advertisers to promote their brands, products and services, and to amplify their visibility and reach. Advertisers can usewww.momspot.com to communicate directly with their natural constituency and reach a broader audience and further promote their brands, products and services. Our natural targeting capabilities allow Advertisers to better reach users who are more likely to engage with their ads, better achieve their goals and improve the return on their ad spending. Our advertising services provide compelling value to our Advertisers by delivering the ability to reach a large audience through our website and to-be-developed mobile applications, the ability to target ads based on our understanding of our users, and the opportunity to generate significant earned media. We expect that most, but not necessarily all, of our Advertisers will be Platform Partners.

We believe the Momspot platform will provide our Platform Partners and Advertisers with the following benefits:

·Risk-free opportunity to allow users to engage directly with products and brands.  Because of our pay-for-performance revenue model, Platform Partners and Advertisers will pay us on a performance basis, meaning they only pay us when a user engages with their ad, such as when a user clicks on a link for a promoted product or replies to or favorites a promoted product.  The pay-for-performance structure aligns our interests in delivering relevant and engaging ads to our users with those of our Advertisers.

·Risk-free opportunity to drive user traffic and increase transaction volume; brand equity leverage. As Momspot’s brand equity is enhanced, Platform Partners and Advertisers will benefit.

·Automatic market segmentation. Platform Partners and Advertisers will be able to instantly reach a distinct market segment, which happens to be large and that has a significant amount of disposable income.

·Unique Ad Formats Native to the User Experience. The organization of our website, including product placement and curation, will appear to the user as natural and organic.  Thus, we will provide Platform Partners and Advertisers with an opportunity to reach our users without disrupting or detracting from the user experience.  As such, Platform Partners and Advertisers can drive product webpage visits or application installs.

·Connect in Context. Platform Partners and Advertisers can gain meaningful insights and market intelligence from, and respond directly to, the feedback from customers.  Our Platform Partners and Advertisers will have powerful context to connect their messages to what is most meaningful to our users in real time, and can engage directly with their customers.  We will be able to provide Platform Partners and Advertisers with measurable, accountable and repeatable results including the following: unique monthly visits, average visit duration, bounce rate, pages per visit, page views, percentage of new visits, demographics (e.g., age, gender) and geography (e.g., country, region, state, city)

·Extension of Offline Advertising Campaigns.  Advertising on affiliated marketing sites complements offline advertising campaigns, such as television ads.  Additionally, we enable Advertisers to engage directly with users who have been exposed to their ads on television.  We believe that synchronizing Momspot and television advertising campaigns makes brand messages more engaging and interactive.

Our Value Proposition – To Data Partners

We will license or sell our data to Data Partners,i.e., third-party marketers and advertisers who will search and analyze historical and real-time data on our platform. Our Data Partners will be able to use this data to generate and monetize data analytics, from which data partners can identify user sentiment, influence and other trends.

Specifically, our platform provides our Data Partners with the following benefits:

·Access to Actionable Data.Our platform will enable our Data Partners to analyze and act upon data based on how users engage on our platform.  This data can then serve as the foundation for applications and tools that can draw relationships between social interactions and business results, and even derive signals that predict consumer preferences.

·Ability to Create Measurement Standards. We will provide our Data Partners with the tools and data to find the right signal for the right audience.

5

Revenue Model

Eventually, we expect our revenue to include the following:

·Affiliate Commissions – When one of our users purchases a product from one of our Platform Partners or Advertisers, we will receive a percentage of the purchase price.  The rate of the commissions will vary, depending on the merchant and other factors.  For example, we may enter into special arrangements with Platform Partners to promote specific products, in which case the rate may be higher than the usual rate.

·Affiliate CPC Revenue– Each time a user clicks on a button that redirects the user to the website of a Platform Partner or Advertiser, that Platform Partner or Advertiser will pay us a fee.

·Display Advertising– Advertisers, whether or not they are Platform Partners, will pay us a fee for display ads.  The rates will depend on the ad placement and frequency and are typically measured on a CPM basis (i.e., cost per 1,000 impressions).

·Sponsored Content –Part of our strategy is to promote our website to serve as a resource for our targeted market segment and to serve as a forum where users can interact with each other.  In order to achieve this goal, we will look to bring sponsored content, such as blogs or articles of interest to Moms.  We will charge a fee to persons who wish to post content on our site.  The fee will probably be based on a CPC pricing model.

·Data Analytics –We have created a detailed measurement plan to regularly track and collect site data and user interactions.  We plan to leverage Google Analytics as the platform and tool by which we will collect and analyze this data.  This plan focuses on the analyzing the number of unique visitors per month, page views per visit, visit duration, bounce rate, and defined user conversions.  We will look to sell or license this data to third party marketers and other interested parties.

Our Growth Strategy

As is typical of affiliate marketing companies, our strategy is to build brand awareness using marketing strategies that focus on our target market. See “Sales and Marketing”, below. We believe that the growth of our business will be driven by a virtuous cycle that starts with what is best for our users. We believe that growth in our user base and user engagement will be a fundamental driver to the growth of our business, and we believe that there is a significant opportunity to develop a robust user base. Growth in our user base will drive more unique content, which in turn will drive the viral, organic promotion of content on and off our properties, thereby attracting more Platform Partners, Advertisers and even Data Partners. As we attract more users, the value proposition for Platform Partners and Advertisers increases, incentivizing them to develop unique and compelling content for our platform.

In addition to our Sales and Marketing strategy, our growth strategy includes the following:

·Add relevant and meaningful content to our website.  We will expand our value proposition by adding editorial and sponsored content towww.momspot.com.  This will most likely occur at first through the addition of a weblog or “Blog” section where individuals will write short articles (“Blog posts”) that are contextually relevant to our website.  These may include consumer product reviews and recommendations, parenting tips, fashion and style trends, or discussions about popular culture.  Initially, we will look to both syndicate articles and posts from partner content sites and use freelance writers to create exclusive content for Momspot.  Eventually, we hope to build an in-house editorial team that will focus on publishing new content on the site on a weekly or daily basis.
·Mobile Applications.We plan to develop mobile applications to increase our reach and make our service accessible to more users.

·Product Development. We plan to continue to build and acquire new technologies to develop and improve our products and services and make our platform more valuable and accessible to people around the world.

·Replicate the platform for other market segments. Once the initial Momspot site is complete and we have achieved a certain amount of success in acquiring user traffic and building our brand reputation, we intend to replicate the Momspot platform for different market segments (e.g., men, students, athletes, grandparents).  The functionality and features of these new websites will essentially be comparable to the Momspot website, but we will create a new logo and brand identity, including color palette and UI style, that we feel will appeal to the particular new market segment we are targeting.
·Geographic expansion. Our initial focus for Momspot is the North American market.  However, eventually, we hope to create cloned websites for other geographic markets (e.g., Latin America, Asia, the Middle East and Europe).  Content on these sites will be in the local language, and contain Platform Partners and Advertisers that are well known in the specific region. 

·Expand into the physical realm.  Once we have built Momspot into a well-recognized consumer brand, our hope is to leverage this brand equity and expand into the physical realm by creating “brick-and-mortar” “Momspots” that will be a combination of a café, day-care and retail store.  The notion is to create a physical domain where Moms can go with their babies and/or children that offers them the following value-added services:

(i)An opportunity for Moms to meet and socialize in a relaxed and comfortable environment;

(ii)An opportunity for children to interact with other children their own age (i.e., play dates) under proper supervision; and

(iii)A retail destination where Moms can shop for themselves and their children (of all ages).

Acquisitions. We may also seek to acquire other businesses or assets that would enable us to expand our business. These acquisition opportunities may be in the same or complementary markets. We have neither identified any such acquisition opportunities nor can we predict the terms of any such acquisitions. We cannot assure you that we will be able to complete any acquisitions.

Sales and Marketing

As a start-up venture, sales and marketing is critical to our success. Acquisition of users, Platform Partners, and Advertisers requires significant resources, which is why we have made it such a significant part of our budget and one of the largest focuses of our business. Our annual marketing budget, $115,000 to $150,000, for each of the current and ensuing fiscal years represents the largest allocation of funds. Our goal through marketing is to build our brand popularity and reputation that will translate into heavy user traffic and engagement, and ultimately traffic and sales for Platform Partners and Advertisers. To achieve this, we have developed the following sales and marketing strategy:

·Search Engine Marketing (SEM) – paying a search engine to display your ad when a user searches on specific keyword terms;

·Search Engine Optimization (SEO) – optimizing site code and content such that the site URL is ranked higher in a search engines organic search results;

·Paid advertising – paying websites or other media to display ads or sponsored content;

·Public relations – promoting our website through various popular media channels, including television, radio, magazines and online channels (e.g. blogs, online magazines);

·Strategic partnerships – entering into relationships with other enterprises that we believe will enhance our image, increase brand awareness or otherwise have a positive impact on our business;

·Event Sponsorships – attending or participating in trade shows and conventions and sponsoring various events that target the Mommy Market; and

·Viral marketing campaigns – a method of product promotion that relies on getting customers to market an idea, product or service on their own by telling their friends about the idea, product or service, usually via email or text.

With respect to acquiring Platform Partners and Advertisers, our principal strategy is to work through third parties that specialize in building affiliate networks, principally CJ Affiliate by Conversant (formerly known as “Commission Junction”), and to solicit Platform Partners and Advertisers directly. At the present time, we have approximately 20 Platform Partners, all of whom we acquired through CJ Affiliate by Conversant.

Competition

Our industry is evolving rapidly and is becoming increasingly competitive, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to compete effectively. See the sections titled “Risk Factors—If we are unable to compete effectively for users and advertiser spend, our business and operating results could be harmed” and “We will need to hire highly skilled personnel to grow and operate our business, and if we are unable to hire, retain and motivate our personnel, we may not be able to grow effectively.” We believe the principal barriers to entry are the following:

·acquiring a valuable domain name;

·building a user base and a robust affiliate network; and

·financial resources for sales and marketing.

We expect to face significant competition in all aspects of our business – for users, Platform Partners, Advertisers and also for personnel.

In general, the competitive landscape in which we operate is vast. Our competitors include traditional “brick and mortar” retailers, whether or not they have an online presence; online retailers, such as Amazon.com; and comparison shopping sites such as GoogleShop, Shopzilla and others. However, rather than view these enterprises as competitors, we prefer to treat them as potential Platform Partners. In our view, our real competitors are online comparison shopping sites that target the Mommy Market. We are aware of three such sites:www.weespring.com,www.theprowl.com andwww.cricketscircle.com.

Many of our competitors and potential competitors have greater financial resources, larger user bases and longer operating histories than we do. As a result, they have a significant competitive advantage over us when it comes to attracting users, Platform Partners, Advertisers and personnel. Our ability to compete effectively will ultimately depend on many factors, some of which may not be entirely within our control. These factors include usefulness, ease of use, performance and reliability of our website; the scope and quality of the products and services offered on our website; our ability to establish and maintain relationships with Platform Partners that integrate with our platform; and our reputation and the strength of our brand.

Notwithstanding the highly competitive environment in which we will operate, we believe we will be able to compete effectively based on the following:

·We own valuable internet real estate, technical capabilities and a unique and trademarked brand name that has the potential to become extremely popular, giving us the ability to target and attract this large and valuable market segment.

·Our curated content and unique features, including the ability to create one’s own customizable “Momspot,” will increase user engagement and product click rates.  Advertisers will want to leverage these assets to help them market their products and services to this market segment.

·The functionality of the website will allow for better product searching, including paid search results that appear to be natural and organic leading to improved click-through rates.  Natural/organic results have 10x the click-through rate compared to display ads.  Additionally, our website will have unique functionality that allows users to solicit real-time product search/selection assistance from friends on Momspot or other social networks.

·Retailers and brands targeting this market number in the thousands, and include large multi-national companies.  We intend to give these merchants a risk-free channel to market their products and services to this market, acquire new traffic and customers, and have their products viewed by a larger audience.

Our belief, as described above, is based on a number of factors including our familiarity with the marketplace, management’s experience with online businesses and the success of other companies that have employed the affiliated network business model. To a lesser extent it is also based on anecdotal evidence acquired through informal surveys and discussions with users and potential users following their participation in various surveys we conducted.

We further believe that, ultimately, the growth of our business will be driven by a virtuous cycle that starts with what is best for our users. We believe that growth in our user base and user engagement will be a fundamental driver to the growth of our business, and we believe that there is a significant opportunity to develop a robust user base. Growth in our user base will drive more unique content, which in turn will drive the viral, organic promotion of content on and off our properties, thereby attracting more Platform Partners, Advertisers and even Data Partners. As we attract more users, the value proposition for Platform Partners, and Advertisers increases, incentivizing them to develop unique and compelling content for our platform.

In order to attract users, we will differentiate ourselves from other websites by focusing on the Mom, not just her babies or children. We will organize our merchandise and content according to what we believe the Mom will find informative and helpful. Our brand will emphasize this fact, and aims to be a sophisticated and fashionable shopping tool and social destination for Moms and Moms-to-be.

Ultimately, our success will depend, in part, on the scope and quality of products available through our website. Therefore, it is imperative that we build the right affiliate relationships. Our competition for Platform Partners will include other online and mobile affiliate marketing companies, as well as online retailers. Our strategy for building an affiliate network is to work through third parties that specialize in this area. To date, we have a 20 Platform Partners. We believe this number will grow rapidly once we launch our website and begin to generate traffic.

We will also face significant competition for Advertisers. Our competition for spending on advertising will include online and mobile businesses and traditional media outlets such as television, radio and print. We believe that our ability to compete effectively for advertiser spend depends upon many factors, including the size and composition of our user base; our ad targeting capabilities; the timing and market acceptance of our advertising services; our marketing and selling efforts; the return our Advertisers receive from our advertising services; and our reputation and the strength of our brand.

As we grow and need to expand our work force, we may also experience significant competition for highly skilled personnel, including senior management, engineers, designers and product managers. Our growth strategy depends in part on our ability to retain our existing personnel and add additional highly skilled employees. Competition for highly skilled personnel is intense, particularly in the New York market, where we are located, and we compete for personnel against online and mobile businesses; other companies in the technology industry; and traditional media businesses such as television, radio and print. In addition, our ability to compete effectively for highly skilled personnel will depend on our ability to foster a work environment that encourages independence, creativity and innovation; opportunities to work on challenging, meaningful and important projects; the reputation and strength of our brand; and compensation.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, we require significant financial resources to execute our sales and marketing strategy to attract users, Platform Partners and Advertisers. At the present time, we have a limited budget for sales and marketing. Until we raise additional capital, we will rely on strategies that do not involve significant expenditures such as activating our social media presence and user network.

Technology, Research and Development

We are in the process of developing a user-friendly website with many features and functionalities that will be of value to our users, as detailed below.

Site Features

The Momspot website focuses on the following features:

·Intuitive and simple product search: Curated content, including product content such as special promotions, and editorial content such as topical articles discussing Mom, children or general parenting issues, as well as other useful information.

·Multi-dimensional product filtering: Giving the user the ability to filter search results by many different criteria, including by price, brand, and retailer;
·Product specifications: Giving the user the ability to filter search results by many different criteria, including details of the selected product such as product description, price, product ratings and user reviews;

·Product and price comparison capability: A table showing the various merchants that sell a particular product, and the price for each merchant;

·Social integration: The ability to post and share products and reviews to social networks, including Facebook, Twitter and Pinterest;

·Customizable area (“My Momspot”): The ability to curate content that is “followable” by other users, and where users can build a community of users with whom they can share and recommend products and interact.

Design and development of the Momspot website will focus on four main sections. These areas are:

1.Momspot homepage and universal navigation;

2.Product search results and filtering;

3.Product details; and

4.My Momspot.

“My Momspot”

The “My Momspot” section will be a place where users can customize content in order to highlight certain products they want to recommend and/or promote to their Momspot user community. Certain views of this section will be publicly viewable by all members of Momspot, and others will be viewable only to those members the user has granted access.

My Momspot will consist of six important sub-sections:

1.My Favorites: users are able to “like” products using buttons located on the product image, which are saved to the “My Favorites” area of the My Momspot;

2.Product Reviews: users are able to review and rate products, which are then saved to the “Reviews”;

3.Baby Registry: users are able to flag products for a baby registry, which are saved to their “Baby Registry” section of My Momspot;

4.Followers: users are able to see other users may be following them, access their public My Momspot, and select any of those users’ profiles in order to view the public section of that user’s My Momspot;

5.Following: users are able to see the other Momspot users they are following, and allow any of those users to view their public My Momspot; and

6.User Profile: this will have two functions:

a.Create/Edit Profile: users are able to add personal information, including hometown, and age and gender of children; and

b.Manager Alerts and Emails: users are able to manage price alerts they may set, as well as the type of frequency of email they receive from Momspot.

Site Design & Development

The site design will have a clean and sleek look and feel, with stylish colors. The user interface will be simple and intuitive, with logical high-level product categorization and navigation. The site imagery will focus on the Mom, not her baby or children, and should dominate the screen space. Moms will be youthful looking and attractive. No sponsored promotions or display/banner ads will be located on the home page.

In terms of technical development, we have organized Momspot’s functionality into the following four areas:

1.Core:
·Merchandise database
·Merchandise data feed
·User database
·Product search
·Product filtering
·Product sort
·Detailed product view
·Product utilities (e.g. sharing, saving, emailing, etc.)

2.Administrative:
·Merchandise management system (MMS)
·Content management system (CMS)
·User analytics

3.Value-Added Commercial Services:
·Promotions/sponsored products
·Sponsored content
·Display advertisements
4.Social:
·My Momspot
·Instant message/chat

Current Progress

Since July 2013, we have achieved the following milestones in connection with our business plan:

1.Hired three independent contractor consultants to focus on user experience (UX), website design and technical development;
2.Created Momspot logo and brand symbol;
3.Developed style guidelines to manage the visual identity of the brand;
4.Analyzed user experience and developed wireframes and functional requirements for key sections of the website;
5.Developed webpage mockups by applying the Momspot style and visual identity standards to the wireframes (i.e. skinning);
6.Developed full webpage comps (i.e., mock-ups of web pages) as a blueprint for technical development;
7.Began analyzing data integration solutions between an affiliate network (CJ Affiliate by Conversant) and Momspot;
8.Began inquiring with merchants regarding their affiliate programs and compiling merchant product data
a.We presently have 22 merchant partners whose products are contained on the site;
9.Completed early development of search and browsing technology;
10.Completed full version of the website for testing purposes;
11.Published a temporary website to the URLwww.momspot.comin November 2013, which allows users to get basic information about us and add their email address to our mailing list;
12.Conducted numerous focus group sessions to get user feedback and help shape functional requirements;
13.Released the first live version of Momspot (v1.0) towww.momspot.comon March 1 , 2014

a.We are not promoting the current live site, but rather waiting till the release of the next version of the website with the newly designed homepage
b.Despite this, since release more than 1,000 users have visited the site, accruing more than 2,200 page views, clicking on 213 merchant products and conducting nine sales transactions; and

14.Began designing and developing a newly redesigned homepage and other site functionality, which is currently live in our staging environment.

Our development team, comprised of our sole employee and outside consultants, has made good progress with product development, having completed a number of phases of site design and the development of the following areas of the website:

·Temporary public website
·Homepage
·User registration & login
·Universal navigation
·Merchant data integration
·Product search capability
·Product details
·Ability to review and rate products
·My Momspot area
oUser profile
oFavorites view
oRegistry view
oFollower/Following view
oProduct Reviews view

Intellectual Property

At the present time our only intellectual property consists of our name, which is trademarked, and we are the registered owner of the URLwww.momspot.com. Over time, as our business matures we may develop processes, methodologies and/or technologies that we deem proprietary. We may seek to protect those rights through contractual arrangements such as confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements, assignment of invention agreements with employees and/or independent contractors, license agreements with vendors and platform partners, and/or through the filing of trademark and copyright registrations or patent applications. We cannot assure you that our efforts to protect our proprietary information and technology will be effective. We may be unable to obtain patent or trademark protection for our technologies and brands, and even if we do they may not provide us with competitive advantages or distinguish our products and services from those of our competitors. In addition, any patents and trademarks may be contested, circumvented or found unenforceable or invalid, and we may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing, diluting or otherwise violating them.

Many companies in the Internet, technology and media industries own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets, and frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement, misappropriation, or other violations of intellectual property or other rights. In addition, various “non-practicing entities” that own patents and other intellectual property rights often attempt to aggressively assert their rights in order to extract value from technology companies. We may, in the future, face allegations that we have infringed on or otherwise violated the patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, and other intellectual property rights of third parties, including our competitors and non-practicing entities. As we face increasing competition and as our business grows, we will likely face more intellectual property-related claims and litigation matters. For additional information, see the section titled “Risk Factors—We are currently, and expect to be in the future, party to intellectual property rights claims that are expensive and time consuming to defend, and, if resolved adversely, could have a significant impact on our business, financial condition or operating results.”

Government Regulation

We may be subject to a number of foreign and U.S. federal and state and laws and regulations that may involve matters central to our business. These laws and regulations may involve privacy, rights of publicity, data protection, content regulation, intellectual property, competition, consumer protection, taxation or other subjects. Many of these laws and regulations are still evolving and being tested in courts and could be interpreted in ways that could harm our business. In addition, the application and interpretation of these laws and regulations often are uncertain, particularly in the new and rapidly evolving industry in which we operate.

We may also subject to federal, state and foreign laws regarding privacy and the protection of user data. Foreign data protection, privacy, consumer protection, content regulation and other laws and regulations are often more restrictive than those in the United States. We may also be affected by a number of legislative proposals pending before the U.S. Congress, various state legislative bodies and foreign governments concerning data protection. For example, regulation relating to the 1995 European Union Data Protection Directive is currently being considered by European legislative bodies that may include more stringent operational requirements for entities processing personal information and significant penalties for non-compliance.

Employees

As of September 30, 2014, Atrinsic had no employees and Momspot had one full-time employee.

History, Background of Our Reorganization

Prior to the filing of our Plan of Reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on June 15, 2012 (the “Plan of Reorganization”), we were a marketer of direct-to-consumer subscription products and an Internet search marketing agency. We sold entertainment and lifestyle subscription products directly to consumers, which we marketed through the Internet. We also sold Internet marketing services to our corporate and advertising clients. The Plan of Reorganization was conditionally confirmed by the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York (Case No.: 12-12553 (JMP)) on June 26, 2013 subject to the consummation of our acquisition of a 51% controlling equity interest in Momspot, which was completed on July 12, 2013. Momspot currently constitutes our only business operation. Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, all debt was converted to equity with the secured creditors receiving 4,600,000,000 shares, $0.000001 par value per share, of a newly created class of preferred stock designated as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) and general unsecured creditors receiving an aggregate of 300,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.000001 per share (“Common Stock”). Prior to March 30, 2012, the Company was a reporting company under the Exchange Act, and filed periodic reports with the SEC. On March 30, 2012, we filed a Form 15 with the SEC, terminating our obligation to file periodic reports under Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

Atrinsic, Inc. was originally incorporated under the name Millbrook Acquisition Corp. on or about February 3, 1994. On or about May 2, 2007, Millbrook Acquisition Corp. changed its name to New Motion, Inc. On or about February 4, 2008, New Motion, Inc. merged with Traffix, Inc., pursuant to which Traffix, Inc. became wholly-owned subsidiary of New Motion, Inc. On or about June 25, 2009, New Motion, Inc. changed its name to Atrinsic, Inc. Pursuant to the terms of a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement dated July 12, 2013, we acquired a 51% equity interest in Momspot in exchange for our commitment to contribute up to $165,000 of working capital to Momspot over a two-year period to fund its business development and operations. Simultaneous with the acquisition, we became a party to the Momspot, LLC Operating Agreement and the manager thereunder.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all of the other information in this Annual Report, including the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Plan of Operation” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes, before making a decision to invest in our common stock. The risks and uncertainties described below may not be the only ones we face. If any of the risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the market price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry

As we have no operating history and we plan to operate in a new and unproven market, it is difficult to evaluate our future prospects and the risk that we will not be successful is heightened.

We have no operating history, which makes it difficult to effectively assess our future prospects or forecast our future results. Given our lack of any operating history and the rapidly evolving markets in which we compete, it is very difficult, if not impossible, for you to predict our future operating results. You should consider our business and prospects in light of the risks and challenges we encounter or may encounter in this developing and rapidly evolving market. These risks and challenges include our ability to, among other things:

·attract users and generate user engagement;
·develop strategic relationships with Platform Partners and Advertisers;
·successfully expand our business;
·develop a reliable, scalable, secure, high-performance technology infrastructure that can efficiently handle increased usage;
·convince Platform Partners and Advertisers of the benefits of our platform compared to alternative forms of advertising;

·develop and deploy new features, products and services;
·successfully compete with other companies, some of which have substantially greater resources and market power than us, that are currently in, or may in the future enter, our industry, or duplicate the features of our products and services;
·attract, retain and motivate talented employees, particularly engineers, designers and product managers;
·process, store, protect and use personal data in compliance with governmental regulations, contractual obligations and other obligations related to privacy and security;
·continue to earn and preserve our users’ trust, including with respect to their private personal information; and
·defend ourselves against litigation, regulatory, intellectual property, privacy or other claims.

If we fail to educate potential users and potential advertisers about the value of our product offerings, if the market for our platform does not develop as we expect or if we fail to address the needs of this market, our business will be harmed. We may not be able to successfully address these risks and challenges or others. Failure to adequately address these risks and challenges could harm our business and cause our operating results to suffer.

We require additional capital to support our operations and the growth of our business, and we cannot be certain that this capital will be available on reasonable terms when required, or at all.

We will need additional financing to operate and grow our business. We anticipate only a modest amount of affiliate and advertising revenue over the next 12 to 24 months, which will only have a negligible impact on our future capital requirements. We estimate that our operating budget for each of the current (i.e., year ending June 30, 2015) and ensuing (i.e., year ending June 30, 2016) fiscal years is $375,000, or $750,000 in the aggregate. The largest single line items in our budget are marketing ($115,000 to $150,000 per year) and development ($80,000 to $130,000 per year), which is essentially the cost of one to two full-time equivalent software engineers and/or programmers.

In order to enable us to continue to sustain our operations until we consummate a financing, on August 15, 2014 each of our two principal stockholders loaned us $45,000, or $90,000 in the aggregate, which should provide us with sufficient working capital for an additional 90 days. We have recently begun to explore new financing opportunities.

Our ability to obtain additional financing, if and when required, will depend on investor and lender interest, our operating performance, the condition of the capital markets and other factors, and we cannot assure you that additional financing will be available to us on favorable terms when required, or at all. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity, equity-linked or debt securities, those securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to the rights of our common stock, and our existing stockholders may experience dilution. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our ability to continue to support the operation or growth of our business could be significantly impaired and our operating results may be harmed.

If we cannot continue as a going concern, you will lose your entire investment.

In their report in connection with our financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, our independent registered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph stating that because we have incurred net losses and have yet to establish profitable operations and other factors, there is substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.  If we cannot continue as a going concern, your entire investment may be worthless. Our ability to continue as a going concern will depend, in large part, on our ability to obtain additional financing and generate positive cash flow from operations, neither of which is certain.

If we fail to develop a significant user base, or if user engagement or ad engagement on our platform do not materialize, our revenue, business and operating results may be harmed.

The size of our user base and their level of engagement will be critical to our overall success, including our financial performance. Convincing potential new users of the value of our product offering is critical to increasing our user base and to the success of our business. We are unable to predict the size of our user base or its growth rate. If the Mommy Market does not perceive our website to be useful, reliable and trustworthy, we may not be able to attract users or increase the frequency of their engagement with our platform. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain or sustain any level of user base or engagement. A number of consumer-oriented websites that achieved early popularity have since seen their user bases or levels of engagement decline, in some cases precipitously. There is no guarantee that we will not experience a similar erosion of our user base or engagement levels. A number of factors could potentially negatively affect user growth and engagement, including if:

·users engage with other websites or platforms as an alternative to ours;
·influential users, such as celebrities, athletes, journalists, media outlets and brands or certain age demographics conclude that a competing website or platform is more relevant;
·we are unable to convince potential new users of the value and usefulness of our website;
·there is a decrease in the perceived quality of the products and services available through our website;
·we fail to introduce new and improved products or services or if we introduce new or improved products or services that are not favorably received or that negatively affect user engagement;
·technical or other problems prevent us from delivering products or services in a rapid and reliable manner or otherwise affect the user experience;
·we are unable to present users with products, services or content that is interesting, useful and relevant to them;
·users believe that their experience is diminished as a result of the decisions we make with respect to the frequency, relevance and prominence of ads that we display;
·there are user concerns related to privacy and communication, safety, security or other factors;
·we are unable to combat spam or other hostile or inappropriate usage on our platform;
·there are adverse changes in the products or services available through our website that are mandated by, or that we elect to make, to address, legislation, regulatory authorities or litigation, including settlements or consent decrees;
·we fail to provide adequate customer service to users; or
·we do not maintain our brand image or our reputation is damaged.

If we are unable to attract a significant number of users or if the number of users begins to decline, this could result in our website being less attractive to potential new users as well as to Platform Partners and Advertisers, which would have a material and adverse impact on our business, financial condition and operating results.

Our revenue will depend on our ability to attract Platform Partners and Advertisers to advertise on our website.

We anticipate that, at least initially, most, if not all of our revenue will be performance-based, determined by the frequency that users click through to a Platform Partner’s or Advertiser’s website or purchase a Platform Partner’s or Advertiser’s products or services. It is unlikely that we will have long-term commitments from Platform Partners or Advertisers. In addition, Platform Partners and Advertisers may view our business experimental and unproven, and we may need to devote additional time and resources to educate them about our business. Platform Partners may not want to partner with us if they feel that user engagement with their products and services is too infrequent. Advertisers will not continue to do business with us or will reduce the prices they are willing to pay to advertise with us if we do not deliver ads in an effective manner, or if they do not believe that their investment in advertising with us will generate a competitive return relative to alternatives, including online, mobile and traditional advertising platforms. Thus, our revenue could be adversely affected by a number of other factors, including:

·decreases in user engagement with our platform;
·our inability to demonstrate the value of partnering with us or advertising on our platform;
·if the products available through our website are not cost-effective or valuable or if we are unable to develop cost effective or valuable advertising services for different types of Advertisers;
·if we are unable to convince Platform Partners and Advertisers to maintain a brand presence on our website;
·changes we may make that change the frequency or relative prominence of ads displayed on our platform or that detrimentally impact revenue in the near term with the goal of achieving long term benefits;
·our inability to increase Advertiser demand;
·our inability to increase the relevance of ads shown to users;
·our inability to help Advertisers effectively target ads, including as a result of the fact that we will not collect extensive private personally identifiable information directly from our users and that we may not have real-time geographic information for all of our users;
·decreases in the cost per ad engagement;
·loss of advertising market share to our competitors;
·decreases in user access of our platform;

·if we enter into revenue sharing arrangements or other partnerships with third parties that adversely affect our relationships with current advertisers;
·the impact of new technologies that could block or obscure the display of our ads;
·adverse legal developments relating to advertising or measurement tools related to the effectiveness of advertising, including legislative and regulatory developments, and developments in litigation;
·adverse media reports or other negative publicity involving us or other companies in our industry;
·our inability to create new products and services that sustain or increase the value of our advertising services to both our Advertisers and our users;
·the impact of fraudulent clicks or spam on our platform and our users;
·changes in the way our advertising is priced; and
·the impact of macroeconomic conditions and conditions in the advertising industry in general.

The occurrence of any of these or other factors could result in a reduction in demand for the products and services available through our website, which may reduce the prices we receive for our ads, either of which would negatively affect our revenue and operating results.

If we are unable to compete effectively for users, Platform Partners and Advertisers, our business and operating results could be harmed.

Competition for users will be intense. We will compete against many companies to attract and engage users, including traditional “brick and mortar” retailers that serve the Mommy Market, and online shopping sites including a number of online shopping sites that target the same market segment that we target. Most of these competitors and potential competitors have greater financial resources and substantially larger user bases than we do, such as Amazon.com, ShopStyle, Google and Cafemom, which offer a variety of Internet and mobile device-based products, services and content. For example, users can search, compare and shop using both Amazon and Google. The online affiliate marketing websites that target the Mommy Market, includingwww.weespring.com,www.theprowl.com andwww.cricketscircle.com, tend to be smaller but nevertheless are already serving the market and, in some cases, are well-funded. As a result, our competitors may acquire and engage users at the expense of the growth or engagement of our user base, which would negatively affect our business. We may also compete against smaller companies, and companies based in foreign countries.

We believe that our ability to compete effectively for users depends upon many factors both within and beyond our control, including:

·the popularity, usefulness, ease of use, performance and reliability of our website compared to those of our competitors;
·the timing and market acceptance of product available on or through our website;
·our ability, and the ability of our competitors, to develop new products and services and to enhance existing products and services;
·the frequency and relative prominence of the ads displayed by us or our competitors;
·our ability to establish and maintain relationships with Platform Partners and Advertisers;
·changes mandated by, or that we elect to make to address, legislation, regulatory authorities or litigation, including settlements and consent decrees, some of which may have a disproportionate effect on us;
·government action regulating competition;
·our ability to attract, retain and motivate talented employees, particularly engineers, designers and product managers;
·acquisitions or consolidation within our industry, which may result in more formidable competitors; and
·our reputation and the brand strength relative to our competitors.

We also face significant competition for Advertisers as we will be competing against online and mobile businesses, including those referenced above, as well as traditional media outlets such as television, radio and print, for advertising budgets. In order to compete effectively for advertising spend, our budget for that form of revenue must be commensurate with those of our competitors, many of which are larger companies that offer more traditional and widely accepted advertising products. In addition, some of our larger competitors have substantially broader product or service offerings and are able to leverage their relationships based on other products or services to gain additional share of advertising budgets.

We believe that our ability to compete effectively for Advertisers depends upon many factors both within and beyond our control, including:

·the size and composition of our user base relative to those of our competitors;
·our ad targeting capabilities relative those of our competitors;
·the timing and market acceptance of our advertising services relative to those of our competitors;
·our marketing and selling efforts relative to those of our competitors;
·the pricing for products available through our website relative to the advertising products and services of our competitors;
·the return our Advertisers receive from our advertising services, and those of our competitors; and
·our reputation and the strength of our brand relative to our competitors.

In recent years, there have been significant acquisitions and consolidation by and among our actual and potential competitors. We anticipate that this trend of consolidation will continue, and that it will present heightened competitive challenges for our business. Acquisitions by our competitors may adversely impact our existing relationships or ability to forge new relationships with Platform Partners and Advertisers. Consolidation may also enable our larger competitors to offer bundled or integrated products that feature alternatives to our platform. A reduction in the number of our strategic relationships or an increase in our competitors’ ability to offer bundled or integrated products that compete directly with us may cause our user growth, user engagement and ad engagement to decline and Advertisers to reduce their spend with us.

If we are not able to compete effectively for users and advertiser spend, our business and operating results would be materially and adversely affected.

User growth and engagement depend upon effective interoperation with operating systems, networks, devices, web browsers and standards that we do not control.

Ultimately, we want our platform to be available across a variety of operating systems. Thus, the interoperability of our platform with popular devices, web browsers, and desktop and mobile operating systems that we do not control, such as Mac OS, Windows, Android, iOS, Chrome and Firefox will be critical to our future success. Any changes in such systems, devices or web browsers that degrade the functionality of our platform or that give preferential treatment to competitive products or services could adversely affect usage of our website. Further, if the number of operating systems for which we develop our platform expands, it will result in an increase in our operating expenses. In order to deliver high quality products and services, it is important that our platform work well with a range of operating systems, networks, devices, web browsers and standards that we do not control. In addition, because we expect that a significant percentage of our users will access our platform through mobile devices, we will be particularly dependent on the interoperability of our platform with mobile devices and operating systems. We may not be successful in developing relationships with key participants in the mobile industry or in developing or modifying our platform to operate effectively with these operating systems, networks, devices, web browsers and standards. In the event that it is difficult for our users to access and use our website, particularly on their mobile devices, our user growth and engagement could be harmed, and our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

Our operating results may fluctuate from quarter to quarter, which makes them difficult to predict.

Our quarterly operating results will likely fluctuate. Our operating results in any given quarter can be influenced by numerous factors, many of which we are unable to predict or are outside of our control, including:

·our ability to grow our user base and the frequency and level of user engagement;
·our ability to attract and retain Platform Partners and Advertisers;
·fluctuations in spending by our Advertisers, including as a result of seasonality and extraordinary news events or other factors;
·the number of product or service engagements by users, whether with Platform Partners or Advertisers;
·the pricing of ads and products and services available on or through our website;
·the development and introduction of new products or services or changes in features of existing products or services;
·the impact of competitors or competitive products and services;
·our ability to maintain or increase revenue;
·our ability to maintain or improve gross margins and operating margins;
·increases in research and development, marketing and sales and other operating expenses that we may incur to grow and expand our operations and to remain competitive;
·stock-based compensation expense;
·costs related to the acquisition of businesses, talent, technologies or intellectual property, including potentially significant amortization costs;

·system failures resulting in the inaccessibility of our website;
·breaches of security or privacy, and the costs associated with remediating any such breaches;
·adverse litigation judgments, settlements or other litigation-related costs, and the fees associated with investigating and defending claims;
·changes in the legislative or regulatory environment, including with respect to security, privacy or enforcement by government regulators, including fines, orders or consent decrees;
·fluctuations in currency exchange rates and changes in the proportion of our revenue and expenses denominated in foreign currencies;
·seasonal factors;
·changes in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; and
·changes in global business or macroeconomic conditions.

We have incurred significant operating losses in the past, and we may not be able to achieve or subsequently maintain profitability.

Since emerging from bankruptcy in July 2013, we have incurred significant operating losses. As of June 30, 2014, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $1,079,000. We believe that our future revenue growth will depend on, among other factors, our ability to attract users, Platform Partners and Advertisers; increase user engagement and ad engagement; increase our brand awareness; compete effectively; maximize our sales efforts; demonstrate a positive return on investment for Advertisers; and successfully develop new products and services. Accordingly, you should not rely on the revenue growth of any quarterly or annual period as an indication of our future performance. We also expect our costs to increase in future periods as we continue to expend substantial financial resources on:

·our technology infrastructure;
·research and development for our products and services;
·sales and marketing;
·domestic and international expansion efforts;
·attracting and retaining talented employees;
·strategic opportunities, including commercial relationships and acquisitions; and
·general administration, including personnel costs and legal and accounting expenses related to being a public company.

These investments may not result in increased revenue or growth in our business.

If we are unable to generate adequate revenue growth and to manage our expenses, we may continue to incur significant losses in the future and may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability.

Our business depends on continued and unimpeded access to our website by our users. If we or our users experience disruptions in Internet service or if Internet service providers are able to block, degrade or charge for access to our website, we could incur additional expenses and the loss of users.

We depend on the ability of our users to access the Internet seamlessly and at relatively low cost. Currently, this access is provided by companies that have significant market power in the broadband and Internet access marketplace, including incumbent telephone companies, cable companies, mobile communications companies, government-owned service providers, device manufacturers and operating system providers, any of whom could take actions that degrade, disrupt or increase the cost of user access to our website, which would, in turn, negatively impact our business. The adoption of any laws or regulations that adversely affect the growth, popularity or use of the Internet, including laws or practices limiting Internet neutrality, could decrease the demand for, or the use of, our website, increase our cost of doing business and adversely affect our operating results. We also rely on other companies to maintain reliable network systems that provide adequate speed, data capacity and security to us and our users. As the Internet continues to experience growth in the number of users, frequency of use and amount of data transmitted, the Internet infrastructure that we and our users rely on may be unable to support the demands placed upon it. The failure of the Internet infrastructure that we or our users rely on, even for a short period of time, could undermine our operations and harm our operating results.

In order to remain competitive and continue to attract users, Platform Partners and Advertisers, we will need to develop new products and services. If we fail to so, we may not be able to generate revenue or increase our revenue base.

Our ability to increase the size and engagement of our user base, attract advertisers and generate revenue will depend in part on our ability to create successful new products and services, both independently and in conjunction with third parties. In the future, we may invest in new products, services and initiatives to generate revenue, but there is no guarantee these approaches will be successful. We may not be successful in future efforts to generate revenue from our new products or services. If our strategic initiatives do not enhance our ability to monetize our existing products and services or enable us to develop new approaches to monetization, we may not be able to maintain or grow our revenue or recover any associated development costs and our operating results could be adversely affected. We cannot assure you that we will be able to improve or enhance our existing platform or develop or offer new products and services.

Spam could diminish the user experience on our platform, which could damage our reputation and deter our current and potential users from using our products and services.

“Spam” refers to a range of abusive activities that are prohibited by our terms of service and is generally defined as unsolicited, repeated actions that negatively impact other users with the general goal of drawing user attention to a given account, site, product or idea, misleading links (e.g., to malware or click-jacking pages) or other false or misleading content, adding users to lists and sending invitations. Our terms of service also prohibit the creation of serial or bulk accounts, both manually or using automation, for disruptive or abusive purposes. Spam detracts from the user experience. Accordingly, we will need to devote considerable resources to combat spam on our platform. Our actions to combat spam require the diversion of significant time and focus of our engineering team from improving our products and services. If spam increases on our platform, it could hurt our reputation for delivering relevant content or reduce user growth and user engagement and result in continuing operational cost to us.

If we fail to effectively manage our growth, our business and operating results could be harmed.

In order to compete successfully, we must make substantial investments to expand our operations, research and development, sales and marketing and general and administrative capabilities. We will face significant competition for employees, particularly engineers, designers and product managers, from other Internet and high-growth companies, which include both publicly-traded and privately-held companies, and we may not be able to hire new employees quickly enough to meet our needs. To attract highly skilled personnel, we will need to offer highly competitive compensation packages. As we grow, we run the risk of over-hiring, over-compensating our employees and over-expanding our operating infrastructure, and we must also face the challenges of integrating, developing and motivating a rapidly growing employee base. In addition, we may not be able to innovate or execute as quickly as a smaller, more efficient organization. If we fail to effectively manage our hiring needs and successfully integrate our new hires, our efficiency and ability to meet our operational and financial goals and our employee morale, productivity and retention could suffer, and our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

In addition, as we grow, we may need to significantly expand our operating lease commitments. Maintaining our platform and website will be costly and we expect our expenses to increase in the future as we broaden our user base and increase user engagement, as the number of users who visit our website increase and as we develop and implement new features, products and services that require more infrastructure. In addition, we expect our operating expenses, such as our research, development, sales and marketing expenses, will grow rapidly as our business expands. Rapid growth could also strain our ability to maintain reliable service levels for our users, develop and improve our operational, financial, legal and management controls, and enhance our reporting systems and procedures. As a public company we will incur significant legal, accounting, insurance and other expenses that we would not incur as a private company. Our expenses may grow faster than our revenue, and our expenses may be greater than we anticipate. Managing our growth will require significant expenditures and allocation of valuable management resources. If we fail to achieve the necessary level of efficiency in our organization as it grows, our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed.

19

We will need to hire highly skilled personnel to grow and operate our business, and if we are unable to hire, retain and motivate our personnel, we may not be able to grow effectively.

Our future success will depend upon our ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate and retain highly skilled personnel, including senior management, engineers, designers and product managers. Our ability to execute efficiently depends on contributions from our employees, in particular our senior management team. We do not have employment agreements with any of our existing employees, and we do not maintain key person life insurance for any of our existing employees. In addition, from time to time, there may be changes in our senior management team that may be disruptive to our business. If our senior management team, including any new hires which we may make, fails to work together effectively and to execute our plans and strategies on a timely basis, our business could be harmed.

Our growth strategy also depends on our ability to attract, hire and retain highly skilled personnel. Identifying, recruiting, training and integrating qualified individuals will require significant time, expense and attention. In addition to hiring new employees, we must continue to focus on retaining our best employees. Competition for highly skilled personnel is intense, particularly in the New York market where we are based. We may need to invest significant amounts of cash and equity to attract and retain new employees and we may never realize returns on these investments. If we are not able to effectively add and retain employees, our ability to achieve our strategic objectives will be adversely impacted, and our business will be harmed.

Our business and operating results may be harmed by a disruption in our service, or by our failure to timely and effectively scale and adapt our existing technology and infrastructure.

As an Internet company, we will inevitably experience service disruptions, outages and other performance problems due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, human or software errors, hardware failure, capacity constraints due to an overwhelming number of people accessing our products and services simultaneously, computer viruses and denial of service or fraud or security attacks. We will rely on third-party hosting services, who may or may not have their own data centers. Accordingly, in the event of a significant issue at the data center supporting most of our network traffic, our website may become inaccessible to the public or the public may experience difficulties accessing our website. Any disruption or failure in our infrastructure could hinder our ability to handle existing or increased traffic on our platform, which could significantly harm our business.

As the number of users increases and as user engagement on our website increases, we may be required to expand and adapt our technology and infrastructure to continue to reliably service the increased traffic to and content on our website. It may become increasingly difficult to maintain and improve the performance of our website, especially during peak usage times, as our product offerings become more complex and user traffic increases. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will be able to increase our data center infrastructure to meet user demand in a timely manner, or on favorable economic terms. If our users are unable to access Momspot or we are not able to make information available rapidly on Momspot, users may seek other channels to obtain the information, and may not return to Momspot or use Momspot as often in the future, or at all. This would negatively impact our ability to attract users and advertisers and increase engagement of our users. We expect to continue to make significant investments to maintain and improve the capacity, capability and reliability of our infrastructure. To the extent that we do not effectively address capacity constraints, upgrade our systems as needed and continually develop our technology and infrastructure to accommodate actual and anticipated changes in technology, our business and operating results may be harmed.

If we are unable to maintain and promote our brand, our business and operating results may be harmed.

We believe that maintaining and promoting our brand is critical to expanding our base of users and Advertisers. Maintaining and promoting our brand will depend largely on our ability to continue to provide useful, reliable and innovative website, which we may not do successfully. We may introduce new features, products, services or terms of service that users, Platform Partners or Advertisers do not like, which may negatively affect our brand. Additionally, the actions of Platform Partners may affect our brand if users do not have a positive experience using third-party applications or websites integrated with Momspot or that make use of Momspot content. Our brand may also be negatively affected by the actions of users that are hostile or inappropriate to other people, by users impersonating other people, by users identified as spam, by users introducing excessive amounts of spam on our platform or by third parties obtaining control over users’ accounts. Maintaining and enhancing our brand may require us to make substantial investments and these investments may not achieve the desired goals. If we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brand or if we incur excessive expenses in this effort, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

Negative publicity could adversely affect our business and operating results.

Negative publicity about our company, including about the quality and reliability of our platform, changes to our platform, privacy and security practices, litigation, regulatory activity, the actions of our users or user experience with our platform, even if inaccurate, could adversely affect our reputation and the confidence in and the use of our platform. Such negative publicity could also have an adverse effect on the size, engagement and loyalty of our user base and result in decreased revenue, which could adversely affect our business and operating results.

Our future performance depends in part on support from Platform Partners and Advertisers.

We believe user engagement with our website will depend, in large part, on the availability of products and services from our Platform Partners and, to a lesser extent, from our Advertisers. The availability of products and services depends on Platform Partners’ perceptions and analysis of the relative benefits of partnering with us. If Platform Partners focus their efforts on other platforms, business may suffer. We cannot assure you that our Platform Partners will continue to offer products and services through our website. If Platform Partners cease to offer products and services through our website, user engagement may decline. In addition, we expect to generate revenue from licensing our historical and real-time data to third parties. If any of these relationships are terminated or not renewed, or if we are unable to enter into similar relationships in the future, our operating results could be adversely affected.

We will focus on product innovation and user engagement rather than short-term operating results.

We intend to focus on improving the user experience with our platform and on developing new and improved products and services for our platform. We will prioritize innovation and the user experience on our platform over short-term operating results. We anticipate that some of our decisions may reduce our short-term operating results although they may be consistent with our goals to improve the user experience and performance for Platform Partners and Advertisers and to improve our operating results over the long term. These decisions may not be consistent with the short-term expectations of investors and may not produce the long-term benefits that we expect, in which case our user growth and user engagement, our relationships with Platform Partners and Advertisers, and our business and operating results could be harmed. In addition, our focus on the user experience may negatively impact our relationships with our existing or prospective Platform Partners and/or Advertisers. This could result in a loss of Platform Partners and/or Advertisers, which could harm our revenue and operating results.

Our platform may contain undetected software errors, which could harm our business and operating results.

Our platform will incorporate complex software and we will encourage employees to quickly develop and help us launch new and innovative features. Our software may contain errors, bugs or vulnerabilities. Some errors in our software code may only be discovered after the product or service has been released. Any errors, bugs or vulnerabilities discovered in our code after release could result in damage to our reputation, loss of users, loss of Platform Partners, loss of Advertisers or advertising revenue, or liability for damages, any of which could adversely affect our business and operating results.

User trust regarding privacy is important to the growth of users and the increase in user engagement on our platform, and privacy concerns relating to our products and services could damage our reputation and deter current and potential users and advertisers from using Momspot.

Privacy and the integrity of personal information is a major issue for Internet users. Any publicity relating to the disclosure and/or unauthorized use of personal information or other privacy-related matters of our users, even if unfounded, could damage our reputation, cause us to lose users and advertisers, and adversely affect our operating results. While our goal is to comply with applicable data protection laws and regulations, as well as our own posted privacy policies and other obligations we may have with respect to privacy and data protection, the failure or perceived failure to comply may result in negative publicity and damage to our reputation and brand, each of which could cause us to lose users, Platform Partners or Advertisers, which could have an adverse effect on our business. Any systems failure or compromise of our security that results in the unauthorized access to or release of personal information or data relating to our users, Platform Partners or Advertisers could significantly limit user engagement, as well as harm our reputation and brand and, therefore, our business. We expect to expend significant resources to protect against security breaches. The risk that these types of events could seriously harm our business is likely to increase as we expand the number of products and services we offer and increase the size of our user base.

If our security measures are breached, or if our website is subject to attacks that degrade or deny the ability of users to access our website, our website may be perceived as not being secure, users may curtail or stop using our website and our business and operating results could be harmed.

Our products and services involve the storage and transmission of personal information and data relating to users, and security breaches expose us to a risk of loss of this information, litigation and potential liability. We may experience cyber-attacks of varying degrees on a regular basis, and as a result, unauthorized parties may obtain access to our data or that of our users. Our security measures may also be breached due to employee error, malfeasance or otherwise. Additionally, outside parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees and/or users to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to our data or our users’ data or accounts, or may otherwise obtain access to such data or accounts. Since our users, may establish and maintain online identities on our website, use of these identities may damage their reputations and brands as well as ours. Any such breach or unauthorized access could result in significant legal and financial exposure, damage to our reputation and a loss of confidence in the security of our website that could have an adverse effect on our business and operating results. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service or sabotage systems change frequently and often are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. If an actual or perceived breach of our security occurs, the market perception of the effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed; we could lose users, and, as a result, Platform Partners and Advertisers; and we may also incur significant legal and financial exposure, including legal claims and regulatory fines and penalties. Any of these actions could have a material and adverse effect on our business, reputation and operating results.

We may face lawsuits or incur liability as a result of content published or made available on our website.

We may face claims relating to products and services that are made available on or through our website. In particular, the nature of our business exposes us to claims related to intellectual property rights and personal injury torts. The law relating to the liability of providers of online products or services for activities of their users remains somewhat unsettled, both within the United States and internationally. In addition, the public nature of communications on our network exposes us to risks arising from the creation of impersonation accounts intended to be attributed to our users, Platform Partners or Advertisers. We could incur significant costs investigating and defending these claims. If we incur costs or liability as a result of these events occurring, our business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected.

We have limited intellectual property rights. However, we believe the intellectual property rights we do have are valuable, and if we don’t protect them effectively the value of our products, services and brand could be adversely affected.

At the present time, our only intellectual property rights include our name – Momspot – and our domain name –www.momspot.com. These rights are important as, in our view, they provide some protection against copycats. In order to protect these rights, we rely on trademark, trade dress, domain name and copyright laws. Effective protection of trademarks and domain names is expensive and difficult to maintain, both in terms of application and registration costs as well as the cost of defending and enforcing those rights. We may be required to protect our rights in an increasing number of countries, a process that is expensive and may not be successful or which we may not pursue in every country in which our products and services are distributed or made available.

We may also rely on non-patented proprietary information and technology, such as trade secrets, confidential information, know-how and technical information. To protect this type of intellectual property we may rely on a combination of trade secret laws as well as confidentiality and license agreements with employees, consultants and other third parties. Even if we enter into agreements with employees and third parties that place restrictions on the use and disclosure of this intellectual property, these agreements may be breached or this intellectual property may otherwise be disclosed or become known to our competitors, which could cause us to lose any competitive advantage resulting from this intellectual property.

Significant impairments of our intellectual property rights and limitations on our ability to assert our intellectual property rights against others could harm our business and our ability to compete. Also, obtaining, maintaining and enforcing our intellectual property rights are costly and time consuming. Various events outside of our control pose a threat to our intellectual property rights as well as our products, services and technologies. For example, we may fail to obtain effective intellectual property protection, or effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which our products and services are available. Also, the efforts we have taken to protect our existing intellectual property rights may not be sufficient or effective, and any of our intellectual property rights may be challenged, which could result in them being narrowed in scope or declared invalid or unenforceable. We cannot assure you that our intellectual property rights will be sufficient to protect against others offering products or services that are substantially similar to ours and compete with our business. Any increase in the unauthorized use of our intellectual property could make it more expensive to do business and harm our operating results.

We may, in the future, become party to intellectual property rights claims that are expensive and time consuming to defend, and, if resolved adversely, could have a significant adverse impact on our business, financial condition or operating results.

Unlike most other Internet and technology companies, we do not own or possess significant intellectual property rights. In order to build our website, we are relying on existing technologies for which we obtained licenses to the extent necessary. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that we will not be a targeted for claims of violating the intellectual property rights of others. Many Internet and technology companies that own large portfolios of patents, trademarks, trade names and copyrights frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement, misappropriation or other violations of intellectual property or other rights. Many of these companies are substantially larger than we are and have significantly greater financial and human resources than we do, which could make us a target for litigation as we may not be able to assert counterclaims against parties that sue us for patent or other intellectual property infringement. In addition, various “non-practicing entities” that own patents and other intellectual property rights often attempt to aggressively assert claims in order to extract value from technology companies. Further, from time to time we may introduce new products and services, including in areas where we currently do not have an offering, which could increase our exposure to patent and other intellectual property claims from competitors and non-practicing entities. In addition, some of our agreements with Advertisers, Platform Partners and Data Partners may require us to indemnify them for certain intellectual property claims against them, which could require us to incur considerable costs in defending such claims, and may require us to pay significant damages in the event of an adverse ruling. Advertisers, Platform Partners and Data Partners may also discontinue use of our products, services and technologies as a result of injunctions or otherwise, which could result in loss of revenue and adversely impact our business.

There may be intellectual property or other rights held by others, including issued or pending patents, that cover significant aspects of our products and services, and we cannot be sure that we are not infringing or violating, and have not infringed or violated, any third-party intellectual property rights or that we will not be held to have done so or be accused of doing so in the future. Any claim or litigation alleging that we have infringed or otherwise violated intellectual property or other rights of third parties, with or without merit, and whether or not settled out of court or determined in our favor, could be time-consuming and costly to address and resolve, and could divert the time and attention of our management and technical personnel. The outcome of any litigation is inherently uncertain, and there can be no assurances that favorable final outcomes will be obtained in all cases. In addition, plaintiffs may seek, and we may become subject to, preliminary or provisional rulings in the course of any such litigation, including potential preliminary injunctions requiring us to cease some or all of our operations. We may decide to settle such lawsuits and disputes on terms that are unfavorable to us. Similarly, if any litigation to which we are a party is resolved adversely, we may be subject to an unfavorable judgment that may not be reversed upon appeal. The terms of such a settlement or judgment may require us to cease some or all of our operations or pay substantial amounts to the other party. In addition, we may have to seek a license to continue practices found to be in violation of a third party’s rights. If we are required, or choose, to enter into royalty or licensing arrangements, such arrangements may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all, and may significantly increase our operating costs and expenses. As a result, we may also be required to develop or procure alternative non-infringing technology or discontinue use of the technology. The development or procurement of alternative non-infringing technology could require significant effort and expense or may not be feasible. An unfavorable resolution of the disputes and litigation referred to above could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

We will rely, in part, on Internet search engines and application marketplaces to drive traffic to our platform, and if we fail to appear high up in the search results or rankings, traffic to our platform could decline and our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

We will depend, in part, on Internet search engines, such as Google, Bing and Yahoo!, to drive traffic to our website. For example, when a user types an inquiry into a search engine, we rely on a high organic search result ranking of our webpages in these search results to refer the user to our website. However, our ability to maintain high organic search result rankings is not within our control. Our competitors’ search engine optimization, or SEO, efforts may result in their websites receiving a higher search result page ranking than ours, or Internet search engines could revise their methodologies in a way that would adversely affect our search result rankings. For example, Google has integrated its social networking offerings, including Google+, with some of its products, including search, which has negatively impacted the organic search ranking of our webpages. If Internet search engines modify their search algorithms in ways that are detrimental to us, or if our competitors’ SEO efforts are more successful than ours, the growth in our user base could slow. Based on our knowledge of how search engines work and experiences of other websites, we expect our website to also experience fluctuations in search result rankings, which could adversely impact the number of users visiting our website. Any reduction in the number of users directed to our mobile applications or website through application marketplaces and search engines could harm our business and operating results.

In the future, should we develop a mobile application for momspot.com, we will rely on application marketplaces, such as Apple’s App Store and Google’s Play, to drive downloads of our mobile applications. In the future, Apple, Google or other operators of application marketplaces may make changes to their marketplaces which make access to our platform more difficult.

More people are using devices other than personal computers to access the Internet and new platforms to produce and consume content. We need to develop and promote the adoption of our mobile applications, and our business and operating results may be harmed if we are unable to do so.

The number of people who access the Internet through devices other than personal computers, including mobile phones, smartphones, handheld computers such as net books and tablets, video game consoles, and television set-top devices, has increased dramatically in the past few years. Our business and operating results may be harmed if we fail to develop mobile applications or users do not install our mobile application when they change or upgrade their mobile device. At the present time, we do not have the capital to develop a mobile application, which could be detrimental to our competitive position. In addition, as new devices and platforms are continually being released, users may consume content in a manner that is more difficult to monetize. It is difficult to predict the problems we may encounter in adapting our products and services and developing competitive new products and services that are compatible with new devices or platforms. If we are unable to develop products and services that are compatible with new devices and platforms, or if we are unable to drive continued adoption of our mobile applications, our business and operating results may be harmed.

Natural disasters, including earthquakes, fire, power outages, floods and other catastrophic events, and man-made problems, such as acts of terrorism could have a material adverse impact on our operations.

A significant natural disaster, such as an earthquake, fire, flood or significant power outage, could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition. In October 2012, Super Storm Sandy caused major damage along the Atlantic Coast, including New York City. Despite any precautions we may take, the occurrence of a natural disaster or other unanticipated problem at our data centers could result in lengthy interruptions to our services. In addition, acts of terrorism and other geo-political unrest could cause disruptions in our business. All of the aforementioned risks may be further increased if our disaster recovery plans prove to be inadequate. Given the start-up nature of our business, we do not yet have a disaster recovery plan nor do we carry business interruption insurance to compensate us for the potentially significant losses, including the potential harm to our business, which may result from interruptions in our ability to provide our products and services.

We have determined that our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting are currently not effective. The lack of effective internal controls could materially adversely affect our financial condition and ability to carry out our business plan.

Our management team for financial reporting, specifically, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our internal controls.  At June 30, 2014, because of the inability to sufficiently test the effectiveness of remediated internal controls, we concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective. At June 30, 2014, we concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at a reasonable assurance level because of the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting that continued to exist. Until we are able to test the operating effectiveness of remediated internal controls and ensure the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, any material weaknesses may materially adversely affect our ability to report accurately our financial condition and results of operations in the future in a timely and reliable manner. In addition, although we continually review and evaluate internal control systems to allow management to report on the sufficiency of our internal controls, we cannot assure you that we will not discover additional weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. Any such additional weakness or failure to remediate the existing weakness could materially adversely affect our financial condition or ability to comply with applicable financial reporting requirements and the requirements of the Company’s various financing agreements.

24

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

Anti-takeover provisions contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could impair a takeover attempt.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our bylaws, and Delaware law contain or will contain provisions which could have the effect of rendering more difficult, delaying, or preventing an acquisition deemed undesirable by our board of directors. Among other things, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws will include provisions:

·authorizing “blank check” preferred stock, which could be issued by our board of directors without stockholder approval and may contain voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to our common stock;
·limiting the liability of, and providing indemnification to, our directors and officers;
·limiting the ability of our stockholders to call and bring business before special meetings;
·requiring advance notice of stockholder proposals for business to be conducted at meetings of our stockholders and for nominations of candidates for election to our board of directors; and
·controlling the procedures for the conduct and scheduling of board of directors and stockholder meetings.

These provisions, alone or together, could delay or prevent hostile takeovers and changes in control or changes in our management.

As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to provisions of Delaware law, including Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation law, which prevents certain stockholders holding more than 15% of our outstanding common stock from engaging in certain business combinations without approval of the holders of at least two-thirds of our outstanding common stock not held by such 15% or greater stockholder.

Any provision of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock, and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock.

While shares of our common stock are quoted on the OTC Pink, an active trading market for our common stock may never develop or be sustained.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Pink, an interdealer electronic quotation system operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc. under the symbol “ATRNQ”. However, we cannot assure you that an active trading market for our common stock will develop on the OTC Pink or elsewhere, or, if developed, that any market will be sustained. An illiquid trading market could make it more difficult for investors to sell their shares and could also adversely impact the market price.

The market price of our common stock may be volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Since there has not been a public offering for our stock, we are unable to predict the price at which shares of our common stock will trade or the volume that will trade. In addition, the market price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control.

The market price of our common stock may fluctuate substantially and will depend on a number of factors many of which are beyond our control and may not be related to our operating performance. These fluctuations could cause you to lose all or part of your investment in our common stock since you might be unable to sell your shares at or above the price you pay for the shares. Factors that could cause fluctuations in the market price of our common stock include the following:

·price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;
·volatility in the market prices and trading volumes of technology stocks;
·changes in operating performance and stock market valuations of other technology companies generally, or those in our industry in particular;
·sales of shares of our common stock by us or our stockholders;
·failure of securities analysts to maintain coverage of us, changes in financial estimates by securities analysts who follow our company, or our failure to meet these estimates or the expectations of investors;
·the financial projections we may provide to the public, any changes in those projections or our failure to meet those projections;
·announcements by us or our competitors of new products or services;
·the public’s reaction to our press releases, other public announcements and filings with the SEC;
·rumors and market speculation involving us or other companies in our industry;
·actual or anticipated changes in our operating results or fluctuations in our operating results;
·actual or anticipated developments in our business, our competitors’ businesses or the competitive landscape generally;
·litigation involving us, our industry or both, or investigations by regulators into our operations or those of our competitors;
·developments or disputes concerning our intellectual property or other proprietary rights;
·announced or completed acquisitions of businesses or technologies by us or our competitors;
·new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations applicable to our business;
·changes in accounting standards, policies, guidelines, interpretations or principles;
·any significant change in our management; and
·general economic conditions and slow or negative growth of our markets.

In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a particular company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

In making your investment decision, you should understand that we have not authorized any other party to provide you with information concerning us or our business.

You should carefully evaluate all of the information in this annual report. We have not authorized any other party to provide you with information concerning us or our business.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish or cease publishing research or reports about us, our business or our market, or if they change their recommendations regarding our common stock adversely, the price of our common stock and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that securities or industry analysts may publish about us, our business, our market or our competitors. If any of the analysts who may cover us change their recommendation regarding our common stock adversely, or provide more favorable relative recommendations about our competitors, the price of our common stock would likely decline. If any analyst who may cover us were to cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause the price of our common stock or trading volume to decline. At the present time, we are not aware of any analysts who plan to follow our stock.

We do not expect to declare any dividends in the foreseeable future.

We do not anticipate declaring any cash dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future. Consequently, investors may need to rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investment. Investors seeking cash dividends should not purchase our common stock.

We are subject to the “penny stock” rules, which could adversely affect the trading volume and market price of our shares.

Trades of our common stock are subject to the “penny stock” rules promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act, which imposes certain requirements on broker/dealers who sell securities subject to the rules to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. For transactions covered by the rules, broker/dealers must make a special suitability determination for purchasers of the securities and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction prior to sale. The SEC also has other rules that regulate broker/dealer practices in connection with transactions in “penny stocks.” Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities listed on a national securities exchange, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in that security is provided by the exchange or system). The penny stock rules require a broker/dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker/dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker/dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations and the broker/dealer and salesperson compensation information must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. These disclosure requirements have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity for our common stock. As a result of the foregoing, investors may find it difficult to sell their shares.

ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties

We do not own or rent any real property as all of our administrative functions, principally accounting, are outsourced to third parties. Momspot is headquartered in Boynton Beach, Florida.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

At the present time we are not involved in nor are we are aware of any potential material legal proceedings, claims or government investigations. Future litigation may be necessary, among other things, to defend ourselves, our platform partners and our users by determining the scope, enforceability, and validity of third-party proprietary rights or to establish our proprietary rights. The results of any current or future litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder matters and Issuer Purchases of Securities.

Market Information

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Pink tier of the OTC Markets Group (the “OTC”) under the symbol “ATRN”.  The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated and as reported on the OTC, the high and low bid prices for our common stock. Such quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

  High  Low 
2013(1)        
First Quarter $0.03  * 
Second Quarter  0.01  * 
Third Quarter  0.02  * 
Fourth Quarter  *   * 
         
2014(1)        
First Quarter  *   * 
Second Quarter  *   * 
Third Quarter  *   * 
Fourth Quarter  *   * 

* Less than $0.01 per share

(1) The prices for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013 and 2014 are actual sale prices because the bid price information was not available.

Holders

As of September 30, 2014, there were 333 holders of record of our common stock. This does not reflect beneficial stockholders who hold their stock in nominee or “street” name through brokerage firms.

Dividends

We have not declared or paid any dividends and do not intend to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain any future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business. Any future decision to pay dividends on our common stock will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

In February 2014, we granted options, each with an exercise price of $.002 per share, for an aggregate of 275,000,000 shares of our common stock to our officers and directors for services.  All of the options immediately vested on the date of grant and expire on the fifth anniversary of the grant date. The options were granted in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) thereunder.

Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization approved in July 2013, we issued 300,000,000 shares of our common stock to our former unsecured creditors in satisfaction of our then existing obligations to them and 4,600,000,000 shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock to our former secured creditors. The issuance of these shares was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, pursuant to section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code and section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes our equity compensation plan information as of June 30, 2014:

Plan category Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
  Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
  Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a)
 
  (a)  (b)  (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  N/A   N/A   N/A 
             
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders – Stand Alone Option Grants  275,000,000  $.002   N/A 
Total  275,000,000  $.002   N/A 

The options reflected in the table above were granted in February 2014 to our officers and directors for services and are exercisable for an aggregate of 275,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $.002 per share. All of the options immediately vested on the date of grant and expire on the fifth anniversary of the grant date. The options were granted in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) thereunder.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

We are a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Regulation S-K and as such, is not required to provide the information contained in this item pursuant to Regulation S-K.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Plan of Operation

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Plan of Operation section analyzes the major elements of our consolidated balance sheets, statement of operations and statement of cash flows. This section should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes and other detailed information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Historical Background

We were originally incorporated under the name Millbrook Acquisition Corp., on or about February 3, 1994. In May, 2007, Millbrook Acquisition Corp. changed its name to New Motion, Inc. In February, 2008, New Motion, Inc. merged with Traffix, Inc., pursuant to which Traffix, Inc. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of New Motion, Inc. In June, 2009, New Motion, Inc. changed its name to Atrinsic, Inc. Prior to our bankruptcy filing in 2012, we were a marketer of direct-to-consumer subscription products and an Internet search-marketing agency. We sold entertainment and lifestyle subscription products directly to consumers, which we marketed through the Internet. We also sold Internet marketing services to our corporate and advertising clients. However, by early 2012, we had suspended all operation of these businesses. In addition, until March 30, 2012, we were a reporting company under the Exchange Act and filed periodic reports with the SEC. On March 30, 2012, we filed a Form 15 with the SEC, terminating our obligation to file periodic reports under Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

On June 15, 2012, we filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and terminated all remaining employees. Since then we have been managed by several outside legal and financial professionals. In June 2013, the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York confirmed our Plan of Reorganization subject to our acquisition of a 51% controlling equity interest in Momspot, which was completed on July 12, 2013. Pursuant to the terms of a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, we acquired a 51% equity interest in Momspot in exchange for our commitment to contribute up to $165,000 of working capital to Momspot over a two-year period to fund its business development and operations. Simultaneous with the acquisition, we became a party to the Momspot Operating Agreement and the manager thereunder. Momspot is a development stage company whose goal is to be the premier specialty retail affiliate marketing company targeting women between the ages of 24 and 45 who are either mothers or expecting their first child. Momspot current constitutes our only business operation.

Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, all outstanding debt was converted to equity with the secured creditors receiving 4,600,000,000 shares, $0.000001 par value per share, of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, general unsecured creditors receiving an aggregate of 300,000,000 shares of our Common Stock, par value $0.000001 per share, and pre-bankruptcy petition common stockholders having their pre-bankruptcy shares exchanged for an aggregate of 100,000,000 shares of Common Stock.

As of July 12, 2013, we adopted fresh start accounting in accordance with ASC 852. As a result, we are deemed a new entity for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, the financial statements on or prior to July 12, 2013 are not comparable with the financial statements for periods after July 12, 2013. Operating activities between July 1, 2013 and July 11, 2013 were insignificant.

Results of Operations

We have had no operations since May 2012. We have no revenue.

For the period from July 12, 2013 to June 30, 2014, we incurred a loss from operations of approximately $975,000. It can be primarily attributed to stock-based compensation expense ($274,909) as a result of the options issued in February 2014; insurance expenses of approximately $83,000; and professional expenses of approximately $517,000 related to legal services, consulting services and accounting services. During the period, we recorded $204,000 of professional fees related to a post confirmation liquidation plan and approximately $49,000 of net loss attributable to non-controlling interest.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We continually project anticipated cash requirements, which may include business combinations, capital expenditures, and working capital requirements. In accordance with the Plan of Reorganization, all of our pre-bankruptcy filing accounts payable were converted into equity, which has a favorable impact on liquidity. As of June 30, 2013, we had cash of approximately $717,000 and negative working capital of approximately $17,226,000. As of June 30, 2014, we had cash of approximately $101,000 and working capital deficit of approximately $71,000. During the period from July12 to June 30, 2014, we used approximately $790,000 of cash for operations, which included payments to legal and accounting professionals, payments to consultants to develop our website, insurance, business licensing fees, stock-based compensation expenses and other administrative expenses. This accounted for the total decrease in cash for the period.

We anticipate only a modest amount of affiliate and advertising revenue over the next 12 to 24 months, which will only have a negligible impact on our future capital requirements. As such, we need to raise additional capital to cover our budgeted operating and capital expenditures. Our operating budget for each of the current (i.e., year ending June 30, 2015) and ensuing (i.e., year ending June 30, 2016) fiscal years is $375,000, or $750,000 in the aggregate. The largest single line items in our budget are marketing ($115,000 to $150,000 per year) and development ($80,000 to $130,000 per year), which is essentially the cost of one to two full-time equivalent software engineers and/or programmers.

In order to enable us to continue to sustain our operations until we consummate a financing, on August 15, 2014 each of our two principal stockholders loaned us $45,000, or $90,000 in the aggregate, which should provide us with sufficient working capital for an additional 90 days. We have recently begun to explore new financing opportunities.

Going Concern

We intend to finance operating activities through:

managing current cash on hand; and
seeking additional funds raised in the future.

Our financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2014 indicate there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern as we are dependent on our ability to obtain short term financing and ultimately to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our obligations on a timely basis in order to attain profitability, as well as successfully obtain financing on favorable terms to fund our long term plans.

We need to raise additional capital to cover our budgeted operating and capital expenditures. If our capital raising efforts are not successful, we might not be able to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we not able to continue as a going concern.

Plan of Operations

Business Overview

Since emerging from bankruptcy, we are a development stage company in the process of developing an online affiliate marketing and comparison shopping site targeting the Mommy Market. Our website,www.momspot.com, will aggregate thousands of consumer retail products from dozens of retailers and market these products to the Mommy Market. Our website will offer basic e-commerce functionality, including product search and browsing, product search filtering, and detailed product specifications. Users will also have the ability to share their thoughts and impressions about the products they choose either via email or social networks of which they are a member, and will also be able to save specified products to their customizable “My Momspot”, which they can view or share at a later time. Users will also have the ability to cultivate a network of other Momspot users, or invite new individuals to become members of Momspot, which provides a forum for users to interact with each other and to provide personal product recommendations and reviews.

We are presently using CJ Affiliate by Conversant, formerly known as Commission Junction, to build our network and to source product data from various merchants and to manage our relationships and affiliate commissions generated from these merchants. We have already secured affiliate relationships with approximately 29 merchants. We are also a member of a second affiliate network, although we have not yet activated this data feed. Finally, we also plan to enhance and supplement our product database by working with an existing comparison shopping website.

We released the first live version of Momspot (v1.0) towww.momspot.com on March 1, 2014. We are not promoting the current live site, nor implementing any marketing effort as this release was used primarily for testing purposes, allowing us to gauge Momspot’s organic user acquisition capabilities in addition to allowing us to analyze the efficacy of our site design and layout by measuring user interaction with various website elements and pages.

Despite the absence of any promotional activity, since its release more than 1,800 users visited our website, accruing more than 4,000 page views, clicking on 639 merchant products and conducting 12 sales transactions.

In May 2014, we released version 2.0 of the Momspot website, which contains a newly redesigned homepage and other site functionality.Based on site testing and user feedback, we devised a number of homepage design changes that we anticipate will improve user engagement and bring more value to our user base. These changes include reducing the height and size of the primary homepage image and to add tabbed navigation underneath the primary homepage image that allows for immediate product browsing and filtering. We also added new tabs that will allow users to immediately view products that we have curated based on child age and product importance, products that are most popular among our users, products that are on sale or have been discounted, as well as provide immediate access to the users’ My Momspot area and to our editorial and blog content.

Simultaneously with the release of Version 2.0, we activated our marketing strategy to maximize the site publicity and public awareness of this new release. These strategies include:

1.                      Activating Momspot’s four main social networks on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and Google+ through frequent posts of products and content that all link to the Momspot website;

2.                      Paid Search, also referred to as Search Engine Marketing (SEM), via the major search engines Google and Bing;

3.                      Activating paid advertising via social media channels;

4.                      Hiring a public relations firm to help us get placed in popular magazines and other publications;

5.                      Sponsoring local and national events and trade shows, such as the Biggest Baby Shower in NYC, MommyCon, Brooklyn Baby Expo, etc.;

6.                      Sponsoring contests that are marketed to Momspot users for which prizes may include a paid baby shower or baby reveal party; and

7.                      Encouraging the Momspot user network to share products and make posts on their social networks, as well as to host Momspot-sponsored events.

We anticipate significant growth in users and increased revenues as a result of the release of Version 2.0. However, with this increase in site usage, we will require the support of additional resources to ensure consistent operational readiness of the website.

Development Milestones

Upcoming development milestones include:

·Devise development strategy for release 3.0.We are also in the process of devising a development strategy for building out the components to be included in the next version of the website (release 3.0), which include the following four initiatives:

1.           Partnering with an existing comparison shopping company in order to leverage their merchant product database, product attribution and taxonomy.We are in advanced discussions with a number of comparison shopping engines, including PriceGrabber, Shopping.com, and Pronto.com, to use their existing product database to enhance and supplement our existing product database that is currently procured through our integration with CJ Affiliate by Conversant. This will require the development of a new back-end data solution that will integrate with the comparison shopping site we select, as well as a tool to administer an additional layer of intelligence that allows us to assign additional product attributes and display logic to products procured from this new source. This new data back-end would allow us to provide our users highly curated buying guides that recommend products users may need given their life circumstances, motherhood stage, and age of children.

2.           Seamlessly integrating a blog and editorial area into the website.We plan to add a new blog section onto our website that will seamlessly integrate a Wordpress blog via a link from the Momspot website. The design of the blog will mimic the Momspot style guidelines, and will include email integration such that users who have opted in receive email notifications of new blog posts. This initiative includes the identification of potential content partners and bloggers with whom Momspot will work in order to procure content. This may take the form of either a syndication partnership, where we will wither pay specific bloggers or content sites in order to syndicate specific posts on the Momspot website or a freelance agreement with specific bloggers to write exclusive content for Momspot.

·Version 3.0 Development and Testing.Development of release 3.0 initiatives will be done by a different web development resource than the one that worked on version 1.0. As with version 1.0 and 2.0, there will be extensive development testing to ensure functionality has been built properly and data is being presented properly. Moreover, there will be user acceptance testing (UAT) performed by real users in order to determine the efficacy and usability of site features. Possible feature and functionality changes may occur as a result of this testing.

Human Resources

Momspot has only one employee — Barry Eisenberg — who serves as its chief executive officer. Mr. Eisenberg is responsible for the day-to-day management of all aspects of Momspot, which includes identifying and hiring contractors, managing our financial matters, devising and implementing the marketing strategy, procuring and managing affiliate relationships, conducting market research and focus group testing, website testing, communicating with investors, and overseeing contractors work including design and development of the website.

Third-party contractors are utilized to assume the following critical roles:

1.Defining user experience and functional requirements
2.User interface and brand design
3.Front and back-end web development
4.Legal
5.Accounting

Eventually, we hope to hire full-time individuals to assume these critical roles.

·Human Resources. Our most urgent need at the moment is to hire a full-time technical resource that has full-stack website development experience and can both develop website code as well as manage other development resources. It is preferable that this person be located in New York City where we are currently located. Until this individual is hired, development and deployment of new website releases is at risk of being significantly delayed. At this time, we do not have the financial resources to hire this type of individual.

·Ongoing Site Support and Maintenance.In addition to performing and managing larger development projects, we require a technical resource who can provide on-going technical support and site maintenance to ensure operational readiness at all times. As is common with websites, minor issues may arise that require someone with technical expertise to resolve. Having an individual with technical skills available to the company 24x7, with an expectation of quick turnaround, will be essential to ensure the uninterrupted operation of our website. In the near-term, if we cannot hire a full-time resource, this role will be outsourced to a third party service provider.

Financing – Capital Needs

Momspot was initially capitalized with $165,000 of which approximately $105,000 has been used by Momspot through June 30, 2014 for website design and development, website infrastructure and hosting services, management compensation and legal and accounting fees. Althoughwww.momspot.com went live in March 2014, to date we have had no meaningful revenues. Moreover, we anticipate only a modest amount of affiliate and advertising revenue over the next 12 to 24 months, which will only have a negligible impact on our future capital requirements.

Our operating budget for each of the current (i.e., year ending June 30, 2015) and ensuing (i.e., year ending June 30, 2016) fiscal years is $375,000, or $750,000 in the aggregate. The largest single line items in our budget are marketing ($115,000 to $150,000 per year) and development ($80,000 to $130,000 per year), which is essentially the cost of one to two full-time equivalent software engineers and/or programmers.

In order to enable us to continue to sustain our operations until we consummate a financing, on August 15, 2014, each of our two principal stockholders loaned us $45,000, or $90,000 in the aggregate, which should provide us with sufficient working capital for an additional 90 days. Each loan evidenced by a secured promissory note bearing interest at the rate of 5.0% per annum. The entire original principal amount of the note and all accrued and unpaid interest thereon is due and payable on July 31, 2015. We have recently begun to explore additional financing options.

We need to raise additional capital to cover our budgeted operating and capital expenditures. If the capital raising efforts are not successful, we might not be able to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we not be able to continue as a going concern.

Data Analytics

As with all commercial websites, understanding users’ behaviors and interaction with the site is important to know in order to optimize the site layout and design to ensure maximum user engagement and conversion rates. Conversions include any ‘high-value’ actions made by users on the site – e.g. clicking the “Shop Now” button, sharing products via social networks, etc. We have created a detailed measurement plan to regularly track and collect site data and user interactions in order to make recommendations for site enhancements in order to optimize user interaction. We plan to leverage Google Analytics as the platform and tool by which we will collect and analyze this data.

This plan focuses on the analyzing the number of unique visitors per month, page views per visit, visit duration, bounce rate, and defined user conversions. Presently, we have defined the following as user conversions:

·User registration
·“Shop Now” button click
·Product share via social button
·Product share via email
·User profile completion
·Product save
·Product review
·Price alert setup

We will implement a regular process by which we analyze the data collected through this data measurement plan, and then make recommendations for site tweaks/enhancements based on this analysis. We may conduct A/B testing as a result of these recommendations, or simply make the changes directly to a single instance of the production environment and then analyze the data of the modified site against the previous results.

Contractual Arrangements

We do not have any material contractual relationships.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements that are likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital resources or capital expenditures.

Significant Accounting Policies

We have identified significant accounting principles that affect our consolidated financial statements by considering accounting policies that involve the most complex or subjective decisions or assessments as well as considering newly adopted principals. They are:

Fresh Start Accounting.Effective July 12, 2013 (the “Effective Date”), we adopted fresh start accounting and reporting in accordance with FASB ASC 852. We are required to apply the provisions of fresh start reporting to our financial statements, as the holders of our voting shares pre-bankruptcy received less than 50% of our voting shares post-bankruptcy and the reorganization value of our assets immediately before the date of confirmation was less than the post-petition liabilities and allowed claims. We determined that our fair value on the Effective Date was zero. Fresh start reporting generally requires resetting the historical net book value of assets and liabilities to fair value as of the effective date by allocating the entity’s enterprise value as set forth in the Reorganization Plan to its assets and liabilities pursuant to accounting guidance related to business combinations. The financial statements as of the Effective Date report our results with no beginning retained earnings or accumulated deficit. Thus, any presentation after the Effective Date represents the financial position and results of operations of a new reporting entity and is not comparable to prior periods. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for periods ended prior to the Effective Date do not include the effect of any changes in capital structure or changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities as a result of fresh start accounting. In accordance with FASB ASC 852, our pre-emergence charges to earnings of $778,000, recorded as reorganization items result from certain costs and expenses relating to the Reorganization Plan becoming effective, including the cancellation of certain debt upon issuance of new equity.

Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all majority and wholly-owned subsidiaries and significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The ownership of more than 50% of the voting stock of an entity creates a subsidiary. The financial statements of the parent and subsidiary are consolidated for reporting purposes.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Audit Principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management continually evaluates its estimates and judgments including those related to allowances for doubtful accounts, useful lives of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, fair value of stock options granted, forfeiture rate of equity based compensation grants, probable losses associated with pre-acquisition contingencies, income taxes and other contingencies. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and other factors that are believed to be reasonable in the circumstances. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Macroeconomic conditions may directly, or indirectly through our business partners and vendors, impact our financial performance and available resources. Such conditions may, in turn, impact the aforementioned estimates and assumptions.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. We consider all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of less than three months when purchased to be cash equivalents. The carrying amount of cash equivalents approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.

Fair Value Measurement. The fair value of Momspot was determined based on valuation performed by management, which took into consideration, where applicable, cash received , market participant inputs, estimated cash flows based on entity specific criteria, purchase multiples paid in other comparable third-party transactions, market conditions, liquidity, operating results and other qualitative and quantitative factors.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share. Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing reported earnings by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS includes the effect, if any, of the potential issuance of additional shares of common stock as a result of the exercise or conversion of dilutive securities, using the treasury stock method. Potential dilutive securities include outstanding stock options and warrants.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements. ASU 2014-10 eliminates the distinction of a development stage entity and certain related disclosure requirements, including the elimination of inception-to-date information on the statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders’ equity. The amendments in ASU 2014-10 will be effective prospectively for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those annual periods, however early adoption is permitted. We elected to adopt this ASU effective with its Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with SEC on July 2, 2014. The adoption resulted in the removal of previously required developmental stage disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15 on “Presentation of Financial Statements Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) - Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. Currently, there is no guidance in U.S. GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this ASU provide that guidance. In doing so, the amendments are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this ASU are effective for public and nonpublic entities for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2014-15 on our consolidated financial statements.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Regulation S-K and as such, is not required to provide the information contained in this item pursuant to Regulation S-K.

35

Item 8. Financial Statements

Our consolidated financial statements required by this item are set forth beginning on page F-1.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act, as of June 30, 2014. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officers have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act, including this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that our disclosure and controls are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. The design of any system of controls also is based in part on certain assumptions regarding the likelihood of certain events, and there can no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Given these and other inherent limitations of control systems, these are only reasonable assurance that our controls will succeed in achieving their stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to management and the Board regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP), including those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company, (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with US GAAP and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company, and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of our internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Based on this assessment, Management concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2014 and identified the following material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting:

·A system of internal controls (including policies and procedures) has neither been designed nor implemented;

·A formal, internal accounting system has not been implemented; and

·Segregation of duties in the handling of cash, cash receipts, and cash disbursements has not been formalized and, as a result, we have relied heavily on management review controls to lessen the issue of segregation of duties.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

An internal control material weakness is a significant deficiency, or aggregation of deficiencies, that does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that material misstatements in financial statements will be prevented or detected on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of their work. An internal control significant deficiency, or aggregation of deficiencies, is one that could result in a misstatement of the financial statements that is more than consequential.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter covered by this Annual Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The following table contains information with respect to our directors and executive officers as of October 1, 2014. To the best of our knowledge, none our directors or executive officers have an arrangement or understanding with any other person pursuant to which he was selected as a director or officer. There are no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers. Our executive officers are appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the board of directors.

NameAgePosition
     
Item 15Edward Gildea Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules63 
26
Chief Executive Officer and Director


PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each of our current directors as of April 15, 2010.
Name Age Director Since Position
       
Jeffrey Schwartz (1)
 44 2008 Chief Executive Officer and Director
Raymond Musci 49 2007 Executive Vice President, Corporate Development, Director
Lawrence Burstein 67 2008 Director
Jerome Chazen 83 2005 Chairman of the Board
Mark Dyne 48 2008 Director
Stuart Goldfarb 55 2010 Director
Robert Ellin 43 2006 Director

Jonathan Schechter (1)Jeffrey Schwartz has no relation to Traffix, Inc.’s former CEO, also named Jeffrey Schwartz.40Director
Barry Eisenberg36Chief Executive Officer of Momspot, LLC
David Horin46Chief Financial Officer

Board of Directors
Jeffrey Schwartz.

Edward Gildea.Mr. Schwartz currently serves as our Chief Executive Officer. He has servedGildea was appointed as a director in February 2014 and as our chief executive officer as of March 1, 2014. From January 2006 until June 2013, Mr. Gildea was the CEO, President, and Chairman of the company since November 11, 2008.  Prior to his appointment as Chief Executive OfficerBoard Of Directors of the Company, Mr. Schwartz served as director and chair of the Audit Committee of Atrinsic. Mr. Schwartz served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Lateral Media,Converted Organics Inc., a web publishing and performance marketing company. In June 2007, Mr. Schwartz founded and became managing partner of Vertical Passion Media, LLC, a creator of web publishing and advertising properties, which was later sold to eForce Media.  In 2006, Mr. Schwartz founded and was chairman of AutoCentro, an automotive retail network focused on the Hispanic market.  From December 2001 to April 2005, Mr. Schwartz served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Autobytel, Inc., a Nasdaq listedpublicly held company and as its Vice Chairman from April 2005 to April 2006, where he created a leading online automotive marketing services company, with a market capitalization exceeding $500 million, and having over 25,000 participating dealer franchises and operations in the U.S., Europe and Asia. Prior to joining Autobytel, Mr. Schwartz was President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of Autoweb.com, Inc. from November 2000 to August 2001, also a Nasdaq listed company.that manufactures organic fertilizer by recycling food waste. He previously served as Autoweb's Vice President, Strategic Development from October 1999 to November 2000.  From 1995 to October 1999, Mr. Schwartz held various positions at The Walt Disney Company, including Corporate Vice President with responsibilities in corporate alliance business development.   Mr. Schwartz received Bachelor of Arts, Master of Arts, and Ph.D. degrees in Political Science from the University of Southern California.  Mr. Schwartz serves as a director of U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc., a leading automotive ecommerce company listed on Nasdaq.  The Board selected Mr. Schwartz to serve as a director because of his extensive experience as chief executive officer for several companies and his service in a variety of leadership positions in the areas of fund raising, business development and building a management team. Mr. Schwartz provides critical insight into the areas of organizational and operational management.

Raymond Musci. Mr. Musci serves as our Executive Vice President, Corporate Development.  Mr. Musci has also served as a director since May 2007. From August 2006 through February 2008, Mr. Musci served as President of New Motion Mobile, Inc., and prior to joining our organization as an employee, Mr. Musci was a consultant to our operations from January through August of 2006. Mr. Musci brings over 25 years of high tech, media, entertainment and consumer product experience to us, and was selected to serve as a director of the company for this reason. From 1999 to 2006, Mr. Musci was Chief Executive Officer of Bam! Entertainment, Inc., a company he founded in 1999 that published and distributed movie, sports and cartoon video games to a wide range of retailers. Prior to Bam!, from 1996 to 1999, Mr. Musci was president and chief executive officer of the U.S. subsidiary of Infograms Entertainment, Inc., now better known as Atari, Inc. In that position, he oversaw all aspects of the company's North American unit, was responsible for 250 employees, and grew global revenues from $60 million to $300 million, and U.S. revenues from $80 million to $150 million. Before joining Infograms/Atari, Mr. Musci was founder, president and chief executive officer of Ocean Of America, Inc., a publisher and distributor of entertainment software. Founded in 1990, Mr. Musci built the company to annual revenues of $50 million, and sold it to Infograms/Atari in 1996. Mr. Musci holds a degree in criminal justice with a minor in business administration from Western New Mexico University. Mr. Musci is a director of Talon International, Inc., a former public reporting Company and served ascurrently a member of the board of directors of Brilliant Digital Entertainment,WPCS International Inc. (NASDAQ:WPCS) (wireless communications and Bitcoin exchange) and Worlds Inc. (QTCBB:WDDD) (Intellectual Property gaming software). Mr. Gildea is a practicing attorney. He received his undergraduate degree from October 1996 until April 2009, a former public reporting company. 
1

Lawrence Burstein.The College of the Holy Cross and his law degree from Suffolk University. Mr. Burstein becameGildea contributes expertise in areas of mergers & acquisitions, strategic planning, funding, business development and executive leadership to the Board.

Jonathan Schechter. Mr. Schechter was appointed as a director upon the completionin February 2014. He currently serves as Director of our merger with Traffix, Inc. on February 4, 2008.Investment Banking at Chardan Capital Markets, LLC, a middle-market full-service investment banking and brokerage firm. During his time at Chardan, Mr. BursteinSchechter has been lead investment banker in a directorwide variety of Traffix since April 1999. Since March 1996,transactions including public stock offerings, private placements and mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Burstein has been ChairmanSchechter joined Chardan Capital Markets, LLC in 1998. Beginning in 1999, Mr. Schechter worked as a corporate associate for Brian Cave LLP where he specialized in representing investors and investment banks in capital market transactions. Mr. Schechter also represented and advised numerous public companies in all aspects of corporate law. From 2005-2007 Mr. Schechter served as general counsel to a hedge fund. Mr. Schechter graduated from Duke University, cum laude, with an AB in political science and graduated from Fordham Law School with a JD and is licensed to practice in the BoardState of New York. Mr. Schechter contributes expertise in areas of corporate governance, mergers and a principal shareholder of Unity Venture Capital Associates, Ltd., a private venture capital firm. For approximately ten years prior thereto, Mr. Burstein was the President, a directoracquisitions and principal stockholder of Trinity Capital Corporation, a private investment banking concern. Trinity ceased operations uponto the formationBoard.

Barry Eisenberg.Mr. Eisenberg is the founder of Unity Venture Capital Associates, Ltd. in 1996. Mr. Burstein is a director of several companies, being, respectively, THQ, Inc., engaged in the development and marketing of video games for Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo; CAS Medical Systems, Inc., engaged in the manufacture and marketing of blood pressure monitors and other disposable products, principally for the neonatal market; I.D. Systems Inc., engaged in the design, development and production of a wireless monitoring and tracking system which uses radio frequency technology; and Millennium India Acquisition Corp., a publicly trading holding company.  In addition, Mr. Burstein was formerly a director of publicly traded American Telecom Systems, Inc., a company engaged in the development and marketing of convergent telecommunication services.  Mr. Burstein was selected as a member of our Board of Directors because he adds substantial expertise from his venture capital finance background and his executive experience, as well as his service as a board member on other public companies.  His experience provides the Company with valuable insight with respect to financing and operational strategies and corporate governance issues.

Jerome A. Chazen. Mr. Chazen is currently the Chairman of our Board of Directors,Momspot and has served as oneits chief executive officer since July 2012. From October 2008 through July 2012, Mr. Eisenberg was a vice president in the Acquisitions and Investment Management unit of our directors since April 2005. Mr. Chazen is also Chairman of Chazen Capital Partners,Mubadala Development Company, a privateprestigious sovereign wealth fund and strategic investment company. Prior to Chazen Capital Partners, Mr. Chazen was onefirm of the four foundersGovernment of Liz Claiborne Inc., where he is also Chairman Emeritus.Abu Dhabi, with more than $50bn AUM. In this role, Mr. Chazen isEisenberg was responsible for the acquisition and investment management of private equity assets that deliver both financial returns and long-term social benefits to the Emirate of Abu Dhabi. Mr. Eisenberg was also the founder and BenefactorHead of the Jerome A. Chazen Institutefirm’s Portfolio Analytics group, responsible overseeing the development of the investment and portfolio performance analytics and reporting capabilities for the entire firm. From January 2004 through August 2007, Mr. Eisenberg was a product manager in the Equity Research group at Morgan Stanley, working as part of team responsible for developing an analytic platform to institutionalize a proprietary accounting and valuation framework across the firm’s businesses. Mr. Eisenberg received an M.B.A. in Finance and International Business the focal point of all international programs at Columbia Business School. Mr. Chazen received his Bachelor Degree from the Lawrence Zicklin School of Business at City University of WisconsinNew York, and his MBAan Honors B.A. in Managerial Economics in 2008 and B.S. minor in Computer Science from Columbia Business School.Union College in Schenectady, NY.

David Horin. Mr. Chazen has been a director of Taubman Centers, Inc., since 1992.  Mr. Chazen was chosen to be a director of the company because of his extensive knowledge and experience in executive management, finance, corporate governance matters, private investing and product marketing.


Mark Dyne.   Mr. Dyne has served as a director of the company since November 11, 2008.  Mr. Dyne currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Europlay Capital Advisors, LLC, a merchant banking and advisory firm, and has served in this capacity since 2002. In this capacity, he provides corporate and advisory services. Prior to joining Europlay, Mr. Dyne served as Chief Executive Officer of Sega Gaming Technology Inc. (USA), a gaming company, and Chief Executive Officer of Virgin Interactive Entertainment Ltd., a distributor of computer software programs and video games based in London, England. Mr. Dyne was a founder and former director of Sega Ozisoft Pty Ltd., a leading distributor of entertainment software in both Australia and New Zealand. Mr. Dyne served as one of the first board members and was one of the earliest investors in Skype and Joost.com. Mr. Dyne was chosen to be a member of our board because of his long history of developing digital properties and technology focused businesses around the world.  From 1997 until present, Mr. Dyne has served on the Board of Directors of Talon International, Inc., formerly a public reporting company.
Stuart Goldfarb. Mr. Goldfarb has served as a director of the Company since January 12, 2010. From 2001 to 2009 Mr. Goldfarb was President and CEO of Direct Brands, Inc.  Under his leadership, the company grew to be the world’s largest direct marketer of music, DVDs, and books, with household brands such as Columbia House, BMG Music, Doubleday Book Club, Book-of-the-Month-Club, cdnow.com and many more.  Prior to that, Mr. Goldfarb was President and CEO of bol.com, Bertelsmann’s premier online retailer of books and music, doing business in 18 European and Asian countries.  Before joining Bertelsmann, he was Vice Chairman of Value Vision International, a cable TV home shopping and e-commerce company.  He was formerly Executive Vice President, Worldwide Business Development at NBC, where he held various executive level positions.  Mr. Goldfarb was selected to be a member of our Board of Directors because of extensive history and success in operating entertainment and media related companies.
Robert S. Ellin. Mr. Ellin has served as one of our directors since October 24, 2006, and served as our Chief Executive Officer and President from October 24, 2006 to February 12, 2007. Mr. Ellin is a Managing Member of Trinad, which is a hedge fund dedicated to investing in micro-cap public companies. Mr. Ellin currently sits on the board of Command Security Corporation (CMMD), ProLink Holdings Corporation (PLKH), U.S. Wireless Data, Inc. (USWI) and Mediavest, Inc (MVSI). Prior to joining Trinad Capital LP in 2004, Mr. Ellin was the founder and President of Atlantis Equities, Inc., a personal investment company. Founded in 1990, Atlantis has actively managed an investment portfolio of small capitalization public company as well as select private company investments. Mr. Ellin frequently played an active role in Atlantis investee companies including board representation, management selection, corporate finance and other advisory services. Through Atlantis and related companies Mr. Ellin spearheaded investments into ThQ, Inc. (OTC:THQI), Grand Toys (OTC: GRIN), Forward Industries, Inc. (OTC: FORD) and completed a leveraged buyout of S&S Industries, Inc. where he also served as President from 1996 to 1998. Prior to founding Atlantis Equities, Mr. Ellin worked in Institutional Sales at LF Rothschild and prior to that he was the Manager of Retail Operations at Lombard Securities. Mr. Ellin received a Bachelor of Arts from Pace University.  Mr. Ellin was selected as a member of our Board of Directors because of his background in financing micro-cap companies and his executive experience, as well as his service as a board member on other public companies.
2

OTHER EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Thomas Plotts. Mr. Plotts, 40,Horin was appointed as our Interim Chief Financial Officer on December 16, 2009.  Priorin March 2014. Mr. Horin is the President and Founder of Chord Advisors, LLC, an advisory firm that provides targeted financial solutions to his appointment as our Interim CFO,public companies, which he founded in 2012. From March 2008 to June 2012, Mr. Horin was Atrinsic’s Vice President of Finance & SEC Reporting, a position he held since February 2007. From 2005 to 2007, Mr. Plotts wasthe Chief Financial Officer of DBH Resources, Direct Markets Holdings Corp. (f/k/a privately heldRodman & Renshaw Capital Group, Inc.), a full-service investment bank dedicated to providing corporate finance, strategic advisory, sales and trading and related services to public and private companies across multiple sectors and regions. From March 2003 through March 2008, Mr. Horin was the Managing Director of Accounting Policy and Financial Reporting at Jefferies Group, Inc., (NYSE Symbol: JEF), a full-service global investment bank and institutional securities firm focused on growth and middle-market companies and their investors. Prior to his employment at Jefferies Group, Inc., from 2000 to 2003, Mr. Horin was a Senior Manager in KPMG’s Department of Professional Practice in New York, where he advised firm members and clients on technical accounting and risk management company, which was successfully sold to AON Corporation (NYSE: AOC) in 2007. From 2001 to 2005,matters for a variety of public, international and early growth stage entities. Mr. Plotts was Director of Business Information Systems and Corporate Development at Cardiac Science Corporation (NASDAQ: CSCX). Mr. Plotts served in the Australian Army Reserve, and was commissioned as a Lieutenant in 1988. Mr. PlottsHorin has a Bachelor of EconomicsScience degree in Accounting from Baruch College at the City University of Western Australia andNew York. Mr. Horin is also a Masters of Business Administration from the Marshall School of Business at the University of Southern California.

Andrew Stollman. Mr. Stollman, 45, became our President and a director upon the completion of our merger with Traffix, Inc. on February 4, 2008.  Mr. Stollman resigned from his position as a director on November 11, 2008 but remains in his current operating role with the company.  Mr. Stollman had been Traffix’s President since November, 2002, its Chief Operating Officer from January, 2001 to November, 2002, and its Secretary and a directorcertified public accountant.

None of the company since January 1995. From February 2000 until January 2001, Mr. Stollman was also Traffix’s Executive Vice President and from January 1995 until February 2000, he was its Senior Vice President. Mr. Stollman was also Traffix’s President from September 1993 to December 1994.


FURTHER INFORMATION CONCERNING THEdirectors or executive officers are related by blood, marriage or adoption.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS


COMMITTEES

Director Independence.  Our board of directors consists of five “independent” members,

As a non-listed company, we are not subject to the rules regarding director independence. Nevertheless, the Board has determined that Jonathan Schechter is independent as that term is defined in Section 5605the listing standards of the Marketplace RulesNASDAQ. Generally a director is considered independent as required by the NASDAQ Stock Market: Jerome Chazen, Lawrence Burstein, Robert Ellin, Mark Dyne and Stuart Goldfarb. Our board also has two seats held by non-independent executive directors: Jeffrey Schwartz and Raymond Musci.


Our Board considered the objective tests and the subjective tests for determining who is an “independent director” under the NASDAQ rules. The subjective test states that an independent director must be a person who lackslong as he or she does not have a relationship with us or management that in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilitiesdirector’s responsibilities.

In determining director independence, the Board considered the compensation paid to Mr. Schechter for the year ended June 30, 2014, disclosed in “Director Compensation” below, and determined that such compensation was for services rendered to the Board and therefore did not impact his ability to continue to serve as independent directors.

38

Board Committees

Our Board has the authority to appoint committees to perform certain management and administrative functions. As of a director. In assessing independence under the subjective test,date of this Annual Report, given the limited number of directors, our Board took into account the standardshas not yet re-established any committees. However, we expect that our Board will appoint new directors in the objective tests,future and reviewed and discussed additional information provided by the directors and the Company with regard to each director’s business and personal activities as they may relate to Atrinsic and Atrinsic’s management. Based on all of the foregoing, as required by NASDAQ rules,once the Board made a subjective determination as to each independent directorhas been expanded, we anticipate that no relationships exists which, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.


In making its independence determinations, the Board will consider transactions occurring since the beginning of the third fiscal year prior to the date of its determination between Atrinsicagain establish separate audit, compensation and entities associated with the independent directors or members of their immediate family. All identified transactions that appear to relate to Atrinsicnominating and a person or entity with a known connection to a director will be presented to the Board for consideration. In each case, the Board will determine whether, because of the nature of the director’s relationship with the entity and/or the amount involved, the relationship impaired the director’s independence.
3

Meetings.  The Board of Directors held nine meetings during fiscal 2009.  All directors then serving attended 75% or more of all of the meetings of the Board of Directorscorporate governance committees and the committees on which they served in fiscal 2009.  The Company has not established a specific policy with respect to members of the Board of Directors attending annual stockholder meetings, however, the company encourages its directors to attend annual stockholder meetings.  Five directors attended our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Board Committees. Our Board of Directors maintains an Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee.  Our Board may, also establish special committees from time to time, to perform specifically delegated functions. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter that governs the conduct and responsibilities of each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee, copies of which may be found on our website located at http://www.atrinsic.com.

Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee currently is chaired by Lawrence Burstein and seated by Stuart Goldfarb and Jerome Chazen.  Jeffrey Schwartz, a member of the Audit Committee in 2009, resigned from his position on the Audit Committee in connection with his appointment as our Interim Chief Executive Officer on October 6, 2009.  Each of Mr. Burstein, Mr. Chazen and Mr. Goldfarb qualify as “independent” directors within the meaning of the applicable rules for companies traded on The NASDAQ Global Market (NASDAQ), and Mr. Schwartz qualified as “independent” as well while serving on the committee.   We have determined that each member of our Audit Committee qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the rules and regulations of the SEC, with Mr. Burstein having acquired the requisite experience from having served on the auditestablish other committees of three other public companies for more than 10 years.  Among other responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviews the scope and results of quarterly audit reviews and the year-end audit with management and the independent auditors, reviews and discusses the adequacy of our internal controls, and recommends to the Board of Directors selection of independent auditors for the coming year.  During 2009, our audit committee held six meetings.

Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee is currently Chaired by Lawrence Burstein, and seated by Robert Ellin and Jerome Chazen, each who qualify as “independent” directors within the meaning of the applicable rules for companies traded on NASDAQ. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is primarily responsible for determining the annual salaries and other compensation of directors and executive officers and administering our equity compensation plans.  Our Compensation Committee determines the compensation to be paid to our officers and directors, with recommendations from our full Board of Directors and management as to the amount and/or form of such compensation.  While our Board may utilize the services of consultants in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive and director compensation, we do not at this time employ consultants for this purpose. During 2009, our compensation committee held two meetings, and matters relating to compensation were also discussed at full meetings of our Board of Directors.

Nominating and Governance Committee.  Our Nominating and Governance Committee is currently chaired by Stuart Goldfarb and seated by Robert Ellin.  Jeffrey Schwartz, a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee in 2009, resigned from his position on the committee in connection with his appointment as our Interim Chief Executive Officer on October 6, 2009.  Stuart Goldfarb and Robert Ellin qualify as “independent” directors within the meaning of the applicable rules for companies traded NASDAQ.   During 2009, our nominating and governance committee did not meet, however, matters relating to nominations and governance were discussed at full meetings of our Board of Directors.

Our Nominating and Governance Committee reviews and makes recommendations regarding the functioning of the Board of Directors as an entity, recommends corporate governance principles applicable to Atrinsic and assists the Board of Directors in its reviews of the performance of the Board and each of its committees.  The Committee also reviews those Board members who are candidates for re-election to our Board of Directors, and makes the determination to nominate a candidate who is a current member of the Board of Directors for re-election for the next term. The Committee’s methods for identifying candidates for election to the Board of Directors (other than those proposed by our stockholders, as discussed below) include the solicitation of ideas for possible candidates from a number of sources—members of the Board of Directors; our executives; individuals personally known to the members of the Board of Directors; and other research. The Committee may also from time to time retain one or more third-party search firms to identify suitable candidates. The Committee members also nominate outside candidates for inclusion on the Board of Directors.  The diversity of the background of an individual and their field of expertise is a consideration for membership on our Board. We consider diversity broadly to include differences of viewpoint, professional experience, individual characteristics, qualities and skills resulting in the ability for naturally varying perspectives among our Board of Directors while simultaneously providing skills that complement our full Board so that the Board, as a unit, possesses the appropriate skills and experience to oversee our business.
4


An Atrinsic stockholder may nominate one or more persons for election as a director at an annual meeting of stockholders if the stockholder complies with the notice, information and consent provisions contained in our Bylaws. Stockholders who desire the Nominating and Governance Committee to consider a candidate for nomination as a director at the 2011 annual meeting must submit advance notice of the nomination to the Committee a reasonable time prior to the mailing date of the proxy statement for the 2011 annual meeting. The recommendation should be addressed to our Corporate Secretary.

A stockholder’s notice of a proposed nomination for director to be made at an annual meeting must include the following information:

·the name and address of the stockholder proposing to make the nomination and of the person or persons to be nominated;

·a representation that the holder is a stockholder entitled to vote his or her shares at the annual meeting and intends to vote his or her shares in person or by proxy for the person or persons nominated in the notice;

·a description of all arrangements or understandings between the stockholder(s) supporting the nomination and each nominee;

·any other information concerning the proposed nominee(s) that we would be required to include in the proxy statement if the Board of Directors made the nomination; and

·the consent of the nominee(s) to serve as director if elected.

it deems appropriate.

Code of Ethics.  Our Board of Directors has

We have adopted a Code of Ethical ConductEthics (the “Code of Conduct”Ethics”), which constitutes a “code of ethics” as defined by applicable SEC rulesapplies to all directors, officers and a “code of conduct” as defined by applicable NASDAQ rules. We require all employees, directors and officers, including our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer, to adhere to the Code of Conduct in addressing legal and ethical issues encountered in conducting their work. The Code of Conduct requires that these individuals avoid conflicts of interest, comply with all laws and other legal requirements, conduct business in an honest and ethical manner and otherwise act with integrity and in our best interest. The Code of Conduct contains additional provisions that apply specifically to our Chief Financial Officer and other financial officers with respect to full and accurate reporting. The Code of Conduct is available on our website at www.atrinsic.com and has been filed as an exhibit to our Original Filing. You may also request aemployees. A copy of the Code of Conduct by writingEthics is available on our web site under the heading “Investor Quick Facts.” We intend to make available on our web site any future amendments or calling us at:


Atrinsic, Inc.
Attn: Investor Relations
469 7th Ave, 10th Floor
New York, NY 10018


Section 16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and executive officers and the holders of more than 10% of our common stock to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our equity securities. Executive officers, directors and greater-than-ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of the forms received by us and written representations from certain reporting persons that they have complied with the relevant filing requirements, we believe that, during the year ended December 31, 2009, all of our executive officers, directors and the holders of 10% or more of our common stock complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements, except one initial statement of beneficial ownership of securities and one statement of changes in beneficial ownership on Form 4, which were filed late by Zachary Greenberger; one statement of changes in beneficial ownership on Form 4 was filed late by Larry Burstein, reporting one late transaction; one statement of changes in beneficial ownership on Form 4 was filed late by Burton Katz, reporting one late transaction; one statement of changes in beneficial ownership on Form 4 was filed late by Robert Ellin, reporting one late transaction; one statement of changes in beneficial ownership on Form 4 was filed late by Mark Dyne, reporting one late transaction; one statement of changes in beneficial ownership on Form 4 was filed late by Andrew Zaref, reporting one late transaction; one statement of changes in beneficial ownership on Form 4 was filed late by Jeffrey Schwartz, reporting one late transaction; one statement of changes in beneficial ownership on Form 4 was filed late by Jerome Chazen, reporting one late transaction; and one statement of changes in beneficial ownership on Form 4 was filed late by Andrew Stollman, reporting one late transaction.
5

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides disclosure concerning all compensation earned by our current and former Chief Executive Officers for services to us in all capacities for ourthe fiscal years ended December 31, 2009June 30, 2014 and 2008 (i) as to each person serving as2013. They were the only executive officers whose compensation exceeded $100,000 during our Chief Executive Officer during ourlast fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and (ii) as to our two most highly compensated executive officers other than our Chief Executive Officer who were serving as executive officers during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, whose compensation exceeded $100,000. The people listed in the table below are referred to as ourJune 30, 2014 (the “named executive officers”officer”).
 
Name and Principal Position
Year Salary  Bonus  
Stock Awards
(5)
  
Option Awards
(6)
  
All Other
Compensation
  Total 
                    
Jeffrey Schwartz2009 $106,248  $-  $4,398  $-  $63,332  $173,978 
  Chief Executive
Officer (1)
2008 $-  $-  $-  $-  $17,125  $17,125 
                          
Burton Katz2009 $383,327  $-  $77,688  $-  $875,200  $1,336,215 
  Chief Executive
Officer and Director (2)
2008 $403,657  $21,250  $-  $1,206,999  $21,274  $1,653,180 
                          
Andrew Stollman2009 $425,000  $-  $77,688  $-  $30,219  $532,907 
  President (3)2008 $385,510  $271,250  $-  $1,206,999  $21,534  $1,885,293 
                          
Andrew Zaref2009 $411,467  $-  $56,500  $-  $217,700  $685,667 
  Chief Financial
Officer (4)
2008 $183,333  $100,000  $-  $446,209  $13,331  $742,873 

(1) Mr. Schwartz was appointed Chief Executive Officer (Interim) on October 6, 2009 and on January 27, 2010, Mr. Schwartz was appointed as our Chief Executive Officer.  In fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, Mr. Schwartz received $4,398 of stock awards and $61,000 of cash as compensation for his services as a director prior to becoming our Chief Executive Officer (interim) and received $106,248 in cash compensation for his service as Interim Chief Executive Officer.  Other compensation consists of $2,332 of health insurance premiums and Mr. Schwartz’s cash compensation as a member of our Board.

(2) Effective February 4, 2008, Mr. Katz entered into a new employment agreement in which he was granted options to purchase 300,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.92 per share. In 2009, pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Katz was granted 275,000 restricted stock units that were scheduled to vest after the closing of trading on the date that the average per share trading price of the Company’s common stock during any period of 10 consecutive trading days equaled or exceeded $7.50. The fair value of these awards reflect a 25% probability of vesting.  Also in 2009, as a result of the adoption of a one time option exchange program, Mr. Katz forfeited his 300,000 options mentioned above to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for 100,000 restricted stock units. Vesting terms of the restricted stock units issued in connection with the exchange program were not finalized by the board and as a result these restricted stock units have not been recorded for accounting purposes.  For 2009, included in Mr. Katz’s salary is $334,289 of his regular salary and a vacation payout of $49,038. Other compensation paid to Mr. Katz included payments of $9,000 and $12,177 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to an auto allowance pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement as well as $16,200 and $9,097 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, in health insurance premiums.  In 2008, Mr. Katz earned a cash bonus of $21,250 for his efforts in successfully integrating Traffix and Atrinsic.  On October 20, 2009, Atrinsic Inc and Burton Katz entered into a Separation and Mutual Release Agreement.  Pursuant to the agreement, the company agreed to pay Mr. Katz an aggregate of $850,000 of severance, which is included in “other compensation”, and cancelled all 375,000 restricted stock units held by Mr. Katz.
6

(3) In connection with the merger of Atrinsic and Traffix, Inc., Atrinsic entered into an employment agreement with Andrew Stollman on February 4, 2008.  Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Stollman was granted options to purchase 300,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.92 and received a sign-on bonus of $250,000 upon execution of his employment agreement. In 2008, Mr. Stollman also earned a cash bonus of $21,250 for his efforts in successfully integrating Traffix and Atrinsic. In 2009, Mr. Stollman was granted 275,000 restricted stock units that will vest after the closing of trading on the date that the average per share trading price of the Company’s common stock during any period of 10 consecutive trading days equals or exceeds $7.50. The fair value of these awards reflect a 25% probability of vesting. In 2009, as a result of the adoption of a one time option exchange program, Mr. Stollman forfeited the above mentioned 300,000 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for 100,000 restricted stock units. Vesting terms of the restricted stock units issued in connection with the exchange program were not finalized by the board and as a result these restricted stock units have not been recorded for accounting purposes. Other compensation paid to Mr. Stollman consisted of payments of $10,000 and $11,177 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to an auto allowance pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, life insurance premiums of $4,019 and $1,260 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, as well as $16,200 and $9,097 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, in health insurance premiums.

(4)  On July 14, 2008, Atrinsic entered into an employment agreement with Andrew Zaref.  In connection with his employment agreement, Mr. Zaref was granted an option to purchase 200,000 shares of our common stock. The options were exercisable at an exercise price of $4.16 per share, and were scheduled to vest over three years and expire on July 14, 2018. In 2009, as a result of the adoption of our one time option exchange program, Mr. Zaref forfeited these 200,000 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, in exchange for 66,667 restricted stock units. Vesting terms of the restricted stock units issued in connection with the exchange program were not finalized by the board and as a result these restricted stock units have not been recorded for accounting purposes. In 2009, pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Zaref was also granted 200,000 restricted stock units that were scheduled to vest after the closing of trading on the date that the average per share trading price of the Company’s common stock during any period of 10 consecutive trading days equaled or exceeded $7.50. The fair value of these awards reflect a 25% probability of vesting. Other compensation paid to Mr. Zaref included payments of $9,000 and $7,610 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to an auto allowance pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement as well as $16,200 and $5,721 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, in health insurance premiums. On December 18, 2009, we entered into a Separation and Mutual Release Agreement with Mr. Zaref pursuant to which Mr. Zaref resigned from his position as CFO of the Company.  In connection with Mr. Zaref’s resignation, his 266,667 restricted stock units were cancelled and he was paid $192,500 in severance, which amount is included in “other compensation”. Mr. Zaref’s 2009 salary includes his regular salary of $380,697, and vacation pay of $30,770.

(5) The dollar amount is the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards granted in the fiscal year in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. The fair value of restricted stock units issued was recorded at fair market value at date of grant and in some cases, using a binomial model. For awards subject to performance conditions,

Name and Principal
Position
 Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)
  Option
Awards
($)(3)
  All other
Compensation
($)
  Total
($)
 
                      
Edward Gildea,
Chief Executive Officer (1)
  2014  $14,000  $-  $-  $99,959  $-  $113,959 
                             
Sebastian Giordano,
  2014  $80,000  $-  $-  $124,964  $-  $204,964 
Chief Executive Officer (2)  2013  $105,000  $-  $-  $-  $6,777  $111,777 

_____________

(1)Mr. Gildea was appointed Chief Executive Officer effective March 1, 2014

(2)In June 2012, Mr. Giordano was appointed as our Chief Restructuring Officer in connection with our Chapter 11 Bankruptcy reorganization. Mr. Giordano was appointed as our Chief Executive Officer in July 2013 pursuant to the confirmation of our Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan. He resigned as chief executive officer effective as of March 1, 2014.

(3)Reflects the value reported is computed based upon the probable outcome of the performance condition as of the grant date. For further information, refer to Note 13 - "Stock Based Compensation," in our Consolidated Financial Statements in our Original Filing filed with the SEC on March 31, 2010.

(6) The dollar amount is the aggregate grant date fair value of option awards granted in the fiscal year in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. The fair value of options was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: (a) risk free rate of 3.0% to 3.5% (b) dividend yield of 0.0%, (c) expected option life of 5.6, and (d) expected volatility of 58%. For awards subject to performance conditions, the value reported is computed based upon the probable outcome of the performance condition as of the grant date. For further information, refer to Note 13 - "Stock Based Compensation," in our Consolidated Financial Statements in our Original Filing filed with the SEC on March 31, 2010.
7

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table

Introduction

In this section, we describe our compensation objectives and policies as applied to our named executive officers during 2009. The following discussion and analysis is intended to provide a framework within which to understand the actual compensation awarded to, earned or held by each named executive officer during 2009, as reported in the summary compensation table set forth above.

Determination of Compensation

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) is responsible for determining the annual salaries and other compensation of directors and executive officers, administering our equity compensation plans and assisting the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to management succession and other significant human resources matters.
Among other things, the Committee is required to determine and approve the compensation of the chief executive officer, review and approve the compensation of the Company’s other executive officers, review and approve any incentive compensation plan or equity-based plan for the benefit of executive officers, and review and approve any employment agreement, severance arrangement or change-in-control arrangement for the benefit of executive officers.

Throughout this report, the individuals who served as the Company’s chief executive officer as well as the other individuals included in the Summary Compensation Table above, are referred to as the “named executive officers.”
Philosophy 
Our overall business compensation program seeks to align executive compensation with the achievement of the Company’s business objectives and with individual performance towards these objectives. It also seeks to enable the Company to attract, retain, and reward executive officers and other key employees who contribute to our success and to incentivize them to enhance long-term stockholder value.
To implement this philosophy, the total compensation program is designed to be competitive with the programs of other companies of comparable revenue in the integrated mobile entertainment and internet media business, and to be fair and equitable to both the Company and the executives. As part of the Company’s determination of compensation levels for Messrs. Katz and Stollman when negotiating their employment agreements, the company reviewed the compensation policies of the following companies:  Glu Mobile, Inc., Think Partnerships, Inc., Dada S.p.A., Miva, Inc., Buongiorno S.p.A., Infospace, Inc. and ValueClick, Inc.  In addition, in setting compensation levels, consideration was given to each executive’s overall responsibilities, professional qualifications, business experience, job performance, technical expertise and career potential, and the combined value of these factors to the company’s long-term performance and growth.
Objectives of Executive Compensation
The main objectives of our compensation strategy include the following:

·pay competitively within our industry to attract and retain key employees,

·pay for performance to motivate and align our executives interests with that of our stockholders; and

·design compensation programs with a balance between short-term and long-term objectives, including encouraging management ownership of our common stock.

The Committee strives to meet these objectives while maintaining market competitive pay levels and ensuring that we make efficient use of equity awards.  In furtherance of these objectives, the Committee at times retains outside compensation experts. To this end, the Company engaged Ross Consulting Group during 2008 to provide consulting services with respect to the Company’s executive compensation policies.  In 2009, the Company did not retain outside consultants to provide advice in relation to executive compensation.
8

The Committee seeks to properly compensate executive officers for their services to the Company and to create incentives to focus on the specific goals identified as significant for the Company. The Committee identifies and considers a wide range of measures for individual performance, company performance, and, as appropriate, share price appreciation, and, with the assistance of outside advisors including legal counsel, develops specific performance goals based on these measures. In addition, the Committee endeavors to preserve the Company’s tax deduction for all compensation paid, which can be accomplished primarily by conditioning compensation on the achievement of certain performance goals, as discussed below.

Executive Compensation Components

The primary components of the executive compensation program are:

·base salary;

·annual performance-based cash bonus;

·long-term equity incentive awards in the form of stock options restricted stock units and/or restricted stock;that was charged to income as reported in our financial statements and calculated using the provisions of FASB ASC 718 “Share-based Payments.” The assumptions underlying the valuation of equity awards are set forth in Note 4 of our financial statements, included elsewhere in this report.

·other benefits.

Annual Base Salary

We strive to provide our senior executives with a level of assured cash compensation in the form of annual base salary that is competitive with companies in the digital entertainment and entertainment content business and similar enterprises and companies that are comparable in size and performance.  We strive to set base salaries at levels which are designed to motivate and retain our executives.  The annual base salaries for Messrs. Katz, our former Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Stollman, our President, in 2009 were $425,000 which were negotiated in connection with the closing of our merger with Traffix, Inc., and reflect in part the base compensation that Messrs. Katz and Stollman were receiving at their respective companies prior to the merger.  The annual base salary of Mr. Zaref (our former Chief Financial Officer) was $400,000 and the monthly salary of Mr. Schwartz in 2009 while he was acting as our Interim Chief Executive Officer was $30,000, each of which were established based on their respective negotiations with the Company.

When establishing the base salaries for our Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee considered a number of factors including the individual’s duties and responsibilities, their potential for making significant contributions to the company in the future, their backgrounds in the digital entertainment and entertainment content business and other general discretionary considerations as the Compensation Committee deemed appropriate.  

Annual Cash Bonuses

Annual cash incentive bonuses create a measurable and predictable connection between total executive compensation and our annual performance. Unlike base salaries, annual incentive bonuses are at risk based on how well we perform and how our executive officers contribute to that performance. The Compensation Committee determines the extent to which the performance targets and measurement criteria previously established for a particular year have been achieved based on financial information provided by our Chief Financial Officer, as a result of our audited annual financial statements, including the adjustment to such statements for non-GAAP adjustments in arriving at non-GAAP incentive measurements. The Compensation Committee may, in determining whether performance targets have been met, adjust our financial results to exclude the effect of unusual charges or items contributing income to the current year or other events that distort results specifically attributable to management’s effectiveness for the current year.  In addition, for incentive compensation measurement at the net income level, the Compensation Committee adjusts its calculations to exclude the unanticipated effect on financial results of changes in the Internal Revenue Code or other tax laws or regulations. The Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, increase or decrease the amount of a participant’s incentive award based upon such factors as it may determine as appropriate, and necessary under the philosophy and objectives of their policies.
9


In 2009, as a result of the volatility in the marketplace, cash bonuses paid to our Named Executive Officers, if any, were to be paid at the discretion of the Compensation Committee based on the performance of the company and the executive during the fiscal year.  In 2009, no annual cash bonuses were paid to the Company’s Named Executive Officers as a result of the Company’s performance.

Annual cash bonuses for the Named Executive Officers in 2008 were based on performance criteria established by the Compensation Committee for 2008.  Annual cash bonuses for Messrs. Katz and Stollman were based on two quantitative measures, EBITDA and revenues, and one qualitative measure, the integration of Traffix, Inc. into Atrinsic.  None of the quantitative measures was achieved; however, each executive earned $21,250 for successfully integrating the two companies.  

In 2010, as a result of the current volatility in the marketplace, cash bonuses paid to our Named Executive Officers, if any, will be paid at the discretion of the Compensation Committee based on the performance of the Company and the executive during the fiscal year.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards

The Compensation Committee has designed our equity incentive awards to serve as the primary vehicle for providing long-term incentives to our senior executives and key employees. We also regard equity incentive awards as a key retention tool. During 2009, equity incentive awards were available for grant under our 2005, 2007 and 2009 Plans, which are described more fully below.

As described in the footnotes to the Summary Compensation Table, the Compensation Committee has granted long-term equity incentive compensation awards to the Named Executive Officers in the form of non-qualified stock option awards as well as restricted stock units. The vesting provisions of our equity awards are established in order to encourage employee retention and focus management’s attention on sustaining financial performance and building stockholder value over an extended term.


The following are descriptions of our 2005, 2007 and 2009 Stock Incentive Plans:

2005 Plan

In 2005, New Motion Mobile, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary, established the Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”), for eligible employees and other directors and consultants. In connection with the closing of our exchange transaction with New Motion Mobile, Inc. on February 12, 2007, we assumed all of New Motion Mobile’s obligations under the plan. Under the 2005 Plan, officers, employees and non-employees may be granted options to purchase our common stock at no less than 100% of the market price at the date the option is granted. Since New Motion Mobile’s stock was not publicly traded prior to the exchange transaction, the market price at the date of grant was historically determined by New Motion Mobile’s board of directors. Incentive stock options granted to date typically vest at the rate of 33% on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date, and 1/24th of the remaining shares on the last day of each month thereafter until fully vested. The options expire ten years from the date of grant subject to cancellation upon termination of employment. Upon the approval of the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, our Board adopted a resolution to prevent further grants of awards under the 2005 Plan.

2007 Plan

On February 16, 2007, our Board of Directors approved the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The maximum number of shares available for grant under the plan is 1,400,000 shares of common stock.  Under the 2007 Plan, officers, employees and non-employees may be granted options to purchase our common stock at no less than 100% of the market price at the date the option is granted. Incentive stock options granted under the 2007 Plan typically vest at the rate of 33% on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date, and 1/24th of the remaining shares on the last day of each month thereafter until fully vested. The options expire ten years from the date of grant subject to cancellation upon termination of employment. With the approval of our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan by our stockholders, no further awards will be granted under the 2007 Plan, except that any shares of common stock that have been forfeited or cancelled in accordance with the terms of the applicable award under the 2007 Plan may be subsequently again awarded in accordance with the terms of the 2007 Plan prior to its expiration in 2017.
10

2009 Plan

On June 25, 2009, the Company adopted the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan.  Under the plan, the Company is authorized to grant equity-based awards in the form of stock options, restricted common stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, and other stock based awards to employees (including executive officers), directors and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries. The maximum number of shares available for grant under the plan is 2,750,000 shares of common stock.  The number of shares available for award under the plan is subject to adjustment for certain corporate changes and based on the types of awards provided, all in accordance with the provisions of the plan.

One Time Option Exchange Program

In 2009, the Company completed a one-time stock option exchange program.  Pursuant to the exchange program, certain out-of-the-money stock options previously issued to each of Burton Katz, our former Chief Executive Officer, Andrew Stollman, our President, Andrew Zaref, our former Chief Financial Officer, and Zack Greenberger, our former Chief Technology Officer and Vice President, Operations (collectively, the “Optionees”), were exchanged for restricted stock units (the “Option Exchange Program”).  Messrs. Katz, Stollman, Zaref and Greenberger forfeited stock options to purchase 300,000, 300,000, 200,000 and 50,000 shares of the company’s common stock, respectively, in exchange for awards of 100,000, 100,000, 66,667 and 16,667 restricted stock units (“RSUs”), respectively, which were granted pursuant to our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan.

The RSUs issued under the Option Exchange Program represent the right to receive shares of common stock on specified future dates when the RSUs vest.  There is no exercise price or purchase price for these shares of stock.  The RSUs issued to each of the Optionee’s were unvested on the date of the exchange and were scheduled to vest over three years based on quantitative and qualitative performance metrics which have yet to be established by the compensation committee, with one-third of the RSUs eligible for vesting on each of December 31, 2009, December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2011.  Any RSUs that did not vest on the date that they were eligible for vesting would be forfeited.  Subsequent to the adoption of the Option Exchange Program, the RSUs received by each of Mr. Katz, Mr. Zaref and Mr. Greenberger were forfeited as a result of the terminations of their respective employment with the Company.

Reasons for the Option Exchange Program

The Company granted options to Messrs. Katz, Stollman, Zaref and Greenberger consistent with the view that long-term compensation should align the interest of management with the interests of stockholders.  While the compensation packages of our management team vary, we believe equity compensation is one of the key components as it encourages management to work toward our success and provides a means by which management benefits from increasing the value of our common stock.  We also believe that equity compensation plays a vital role in the retention and recruiting of our management team.

At the time of the Option Exchange Program, the Optionees held stock options with exercise prices higher than the market price of our common stock.  For example, on April 15, 2009, the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market was $1.18, and the weighted average exercise price of the options subject to the Option Exchange Program was $9.04.  For each of the Optionees, the exercise price of their respective options to purchase common stock of the company which were subject to the Option Exchange Program was well above the market price of our common stock.  As a result, an important component of our compensation program was perceived by our Compensation Committee as having little value.  The Compensation Committee adopted the Option Exchange Program to motivate our management to achieve our strategic, operational and financial goals and thereby align the interests of management with the interests of our stockholders, and reduce the risk of key personnel departing for opportunities that they deemed to be more lucrative.

In addition to the above goals, the Option Exchange Program was designed to avoid additional dilution of our equity and to be more cost-effective than simply issuing incremental equity awards or paying additional cash compensation to the aforementioned individuals.  The exchange ratio (the number of outstanding stock options that each Optionee surrendered for cancellation in exchange for RSUs) was 3 for 1 and was determined to provide an appropriate exchange of value based on a variety of factors considered by our Compensation Committee, including the exercise price of stock options that were tendered for exchange pursuant to the Option Exchange Program, the planned performance based vesting of the RSUs that were granted and the market price of our common stock.
11


As a result of the Option Exchange Program, we achieved a net reduction in our overhang shares of 566,666 shares, which represented approximately 2.7% of our then issued and outstanding common stock (excluding shares held in treasury).  This reduction benefited stockholders, as the potential for dilution of their economic interest in the company was reduced.

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2009

The following table presents information regarding outstanding options held by the company’s named executive officers as of December 31, 2009. None of the named executive officers exercised options during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
   Option Awards   Stock Awards 
   Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)      Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)  Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(3) 
NameGrant Date Exercisable  Unexercisable  Option Exercise Price ($) Option Expiration Date
Burton Katz (1)
08/06/2006  363,184   -   2.34 10/05/2010      
 02/16/2007  81,250   -   6.00 10/05/2010      
                     
Andrew Stollman (2)
02/04/2008  67,607   -   9.98 03/08/2010      
 02/04/2008  30,423   -   4.44 04/09/2011      
 02/04/2008  30,423   -   3.70 04/09/2011      
 02/04/2008  30,423   -   3.42 04/09/2011      
 02/04/2008  70,987   -   8.43 12/01/2011      
 02/04/2008  273,809   -   10.86 06/03/2014      
 06/25/2009               275,000  $77,688 
 06/25/2009               100,000   -- 

(1)           On August 6, 2006, Mr. Katz was granted an option to purchase 363,184 shares of common stock at a per share exercise price of $2.34. On February 16, 2007, Mr. Katz was granted an option to purchase 81,250 shares of common stock at a per share exercise price of $6.00. Both of these options originally had a term of ten years and vested as follows: 33.3% of the shares subject to the options vested on the first anniversary of their respective grant dates, and the remaining 66.7% of the shares subject to the options vested monthly over the next 24 months thereafter. On October 20, 2009, Mr. Katz resigned his position as Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to his separation agreement with the Company, all of the 444,434 options to purchase common stock held by Mr. Katz are deemed to be fully vested and Mr. Katz will have until October 5, 2010 to exercise such options, otherwise, they will expire.

(2)           In connection with the merger of Atrinsic and Traffix, Inc., Mr. Stollman’s options to purchase shares of common stock of Traffix were converted into an aggregate of 503,672 options to purchase shares of common stock of Atrinsic at an average exercise price of $9.13, which options were fully vested at the time of the merger.  On June 25, 2009, Mr. Stollman was granted 275,000 restricted stock units that will vest after the closing of trading on the date that the average per share trading price of the Company’s common stock during any period of 10 consecutive trading days equals or exceeds $7.50. The fair value of these awards reflect a 25% probability of vesting. Also on June 25, 2009, as described under the heading “One Time Option Exchange Program” above, 300,000 of Mr. Stollman’s options were exchanged for 100,000 restricted stock units.  These restricted stock units were scheduled to vest in accordance with quantitative and qualitative measures to be determined by our board, which have not been finalized.  Therefore, these restricted stock units have not been granted from an accounting perspective.
12

Other Benefits

Retirement Benefits

We maintain a 401(k) plan in which all full-time employees, including our named executive officers, who are at least 21 years of age and have one year of service are eligible to participate.  We provide this plan to help our employees save some portion of their cash compensation for retirement in a tax efficient manner.  We do not provide an option for our employees to invest in our stock in the 401(k) plan.

 Health and Welfare Benefits

We provide health and welfare benefits for all of our full-time employees, including our named executed officers.  The health and welfare benefits provided to our named executive officers are further described in their respective employment agreements, which are discussed below.

Employment Agreements, Severance Benefits and Change in Control Provisions

Consistent with the above compensation philosophy, we entered into Employment Agreements with each of Jeffrey Schwartz, our Chief Executive Officer, Burton Katz, our former Chief Executive Officer, Thomas Plotts, our Interim Chief Financial Officer, Andrew Zaref, our former Chief Financial Officer, and Andrew Stollman, our President, which include each of the primary compensation components outlined above. The following is a description of the employment agreements with each of the above mentioned Named Executive Officers:

Jeffrey Schwartz

Jeffrey Schwartz is currently party to an Employment agreement executed on January 27, 2010. The employment agreement has a term of three years subject to early termination upon the terms and conditions of the agreement.  A summary of the material terms of Mr. Schwartz’s employment agreement follows:

Title and Salary. Mr. Schwartz shall serve as Chief Executive Officer and will receive a base salary of $275,000 per annum, which is subject to increase at the end of each year of the term of his employment, at the sole discretion of the Board.

Annual Bonus. Mr. Schwartz is eligible to receive a target annual bonus equal to his base salary for each calendar year during the term of his employment, if the Company’s business operations meet or exceed financial performance standards to be determined by the Board.

Benefits. Mr. Schwartz and his family will be provided with medical, hospitalization, dental, disability and life insurance during the term of his agreement. Atrinsic will pay all premiums and other costs associated with such policies. Mr. Schwartz will also be able to participate in any other compensation plan or other perquisites generally made available to executive officers of the company from time to time.

Stock Options. Mr. Schwartz was granted an option to acquire 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share pursuant to the Company’s 2009 Stock Incentive Plan and an option to purchase 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Company’s 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. The first option will vest in equal monthly installments over a period of 36 months commencing on January 31, 2010 and on the last day of each calendar month thereafter until fully vested. The second option will vest over a period of four years, with 25% of the second option vesting on the first anniversary of the date of the agreement and the remaining 75% vesting thereafter in equal monthly installments over a period of 36 months commencing on January 31, 2011.  Any portion of Mr. Schwartz’s option that remains unvested at the time of his termination will be extinguished and cancelled, provided, however, that if a change of control (as defined in the agreement) occurs while Mr. Schwartz is employed with us, and Mr. Schwartz’s employment is terminated by us other than for disability, death or cause or by Mr. Schwartz for good reason within three (3) months before or six (6) months after the effective date of the change of control, all of the options granted to Mr. Schwartz will automatically vest immediately prior to the termination of Mr. Schwartz’s employment and will remain exercisable for a period of one (1) year after such termination.
13

Vacation. Mr. Schwartz is entitled to 4 weeks paid vacation during each year of his employment.

Payments upon termination. If Mr. Schwartz’s employment is terminated by Mr. Schwartz for good reason, or by us other than for cause,this Report, we will pay to Mr. Schwartz: (a) all base salary and benefits which have accrued through the termination date and (b) an amount equal to his base salary.  If Mr. Schwartz’s employment is terminated by Mr. Schwartz other than for good reason, or by us for cause, we will pay to Mr. Schwartz all base salary and benefits which have accrued through the termination date and if Mr. Schwartz’s employment is terminated as a result of his death or disability, we will pay or provide to Mr. Schwartz (i) all base salary and benefits which have accrued through the termination date and (ii) a sum equal to a prorated portion of the annual bonus to which Mr. Schwartz would have been entitled if his employment had continued until the end of the employment year in which his death or disability occurred.

Thomas Plotts

On January 29, 2010, we entered into a letter agreement with Thomas Plotts in connection with his appointment as our Interim Chief Financial Officer on December 16, 2009.  Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Plotts serves as our Interim Chief Financial Officer on an “at will” basis and receives a salary of $250,000 per annum.  Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Plotts received a bonus of $25,000 upon our filing of our annual report on Form 10-K.  Upon the execution of the agreement, Mr. Plotts was granted 25,000 restricted stock units pursuant to our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan and a Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. The restricted stock units fully vested as of March 31, 2010.

Andrew Stollman

Andrew Stollman is currently a party to an Employment Agreement executed in connection with our closing of the Merger on February 4, 2008. The employment agreement has a term of three years, and may be terminated by Atrinsic or Mr. Stollman any time and without any reason. A summary of the material terms of Mr. Stollman’s employment agreement follows:

Title and Salary. Mr. Stollman's title is President and he will receive a base salary of $425,000 per annum during the term of his agreement.

Signing Bonus. Upon the execution of his employment agreement, Mr. Stollman received a signing bonus of $250,000, and all options held by Mr. Stollman to purchase equity securities of Atrinsic (aside from the options discussed below) automatically vested.

Annual Bonus. Mr. Stollman is eligible to receive an annual bonus for each calendar year during the term of his agreement if Atrinsic's business operations meet or exceed certain financial performance standards to be determined by Atrinsic's Compensation Committee. For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008, the Compensation Committee determined the performance of Mr. Stollman against two quantitative measures, EBITDA and revenues, and one qualitative measure, the Integration of Traffix, Inc. into Atrinsic. A cash bonus ranging from $0 to $637,500 could have been earned by Mr. Stollman for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 depending on Mr. Stollman’s performance against the aforementioned performance metrics.  For our fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, none of the quantitative measures was achieved; however, Mr. Stollman earned $21,250 for successfully integrating Traffix and Atrinsic.  For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009, as described above, none of our named executive officers received a bonus.

Benefits. Mr. Stollman and his family will be provided with medical, hospitalization, dental, disability and life insurance during the term. Atrinsic will pay all premiums and other costs associated with such policies. Mr. Stollman will also be able to participate in any other compensation plan or other perquisites generally made available to executive officers of the company from time to time.

Stock Options. Upon the closing of the Merger, Mr. Stollman was granted an option to purchase 300,000 shares of Atrinsic's common stock. The option was exercisable at an exercise price equal to $10.92 and was scheduled to expire on February 4, 2018. Except in the event Mr. Stollman was terminated without cause and except in the event of a termination of Mr. Stollman's employment for good reason, any portion of such executive's option that remained unvested at the time of termination was to be extinguished and cancelled. Mr. Stollman’s options were subject to accelerated vesting upon a change of control.  On June 25, 2009, stockholders approved our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan and our one-time option exchange program.  As a result of the option exchange program, the options Mr. Stollman held to purchase 300,000 shares of our common stock were cancelled, and Mr. Stollman received 100,000 restricted stock units in exchange for such options which are to vest based on performance metrics to be established by our board.  As described above, these performance metrics have yet to be established.
14

Restricted Stock Units. Upon the closing of the Merger, Atrinsic agreed to issue Mr. Stollman restricted stock units (“RSUs”) having a term of ten years covering 275,000 shares of common stock conditioned upon the delivery by Mr. Stollman to the company of a Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, once issued, Mr. Stollman’s RSUs were to first vest, with respect to 100,000 RSUs after the closing of trading on the date that the average per share trading price of our common stock during any period of 10 consecutive trading days equaled or exceeded $15. The remaining 175,000 RSUs were to vest after the closing of trading on the date that the average per share trading price of our common stock during any period of 10 consecutive trading days equaled or exceeded $20. Except in the event Mr. Stollman is terminated without cause and except in the event of a termination of Mr. Stollman 's employment for good reason, any portion of Mr. Stollman’s restricted stock units that remain unvested at the time of termination will be forfeited, extinguished and cancelled. Mr. Stollman’s restricted stock units are subject to accelerated vesting upon a change of control.  The vesting terms of Mr. Stollman’s restricted stock units were amended prior to their issuance on June 25, 2009 so that each of the aforementioned RSUs would vest after the closing of trading on the date that the average per share trading price of our common stock during any period of 10 consecutive trading days equaled or exceeded $7.50.

Long Term Performance Unit Plan. Atrinsic agreed to establish and maintain a long term executive compensation plan for the benefit of each of Mr. Stollman and the other executive officers of the company. Due to the recent volatility in the stock market, the terms of the plan were not established by the company's Compensation Committee.

Vacation. Mr. Stollman will be entitled to four weeksaware of vacation per annum.

Payments upon termination. If Mr. Stollman’s employment with us is terminated becauseany pledges of death or disability or cause or if Mr. Stollman voluntarily terminates his employment with us other than for good reason, we will pay or provide to Mr. Stollman all base salary and benefitsCommon Stock which have accrued through the termination date. In addition, if Mr. Stollman’s employment is terminated asmay at a subsequent date result of death or disability, Mr. Stollman will receive a sum equal to a prorated portion of the annual bonus to which Mr. Stollman would have been entitled if his employment had continued until the end of the employment years in which his death or disability occurred.

 If Mr. Stollman’s employment is terminated by Mr. Stollman for good reason (which includes a material adverse change in the nature and scope of the duties, obligations, rights or powers of Mr. Stollman’s employment, including those resulting from a change in control of the company), or by us other than for cause, we will pay to Mr. Stollman: (a) all base salary and benefits which have accrued through the termination date, (b)Company.

Employment Contracts

We are not a one time payment equal to the sum of (i) two times his base salary and (ii) two times an amount equal to the average of the annual bonus amounts received by Mr. Stollman under the Employment Agreement for the 2 years prior to such termination, and (c) coverage under the employee benefit plans described above until the earlier of the end of the second anniversary of such termination or Mr. Stollman’s eligibility to receive similar benefits from a new employer. In addition, if Mr. Stollman’s employment is terminated by Mr. Stollman for good reason, or by us other than for cause, all stock options and other equity awards granted to Mr. Stollman pursuant to the Employment Agreement (other than options and awards that vest upon the achievement of performance objectives) shall automatically vest, and remain exercisable for a period of one year after such termination.


Burton Katz

Separation Agreement.

On October 20, 2009, we entered into a Separation and Mutual Release Agreement with Burton Katz.  The agreement provides that the certain Employment Agreement entered into by and between the Company and Mr. Katz dated February 1, 2008, as amended, pursuant to which the Company retained Mr. Katz is terminated and of no further force or effect as of October 6, 2009, the date of Mr. Katz’s resignation from the Company, except in respect of the Company’s indemnification and director and officer liability insurance obligations under the Employment Agreement.  The agreement further provides that the Company will pay Mr. Katz an amount equal to $850,000 in connection with his separation and that all 375,000 restricted stock units held by Mr. Katz and all rights of Mr. Katz to receive shares of common stock of the Company pursuant to such restricted stock units are terminated.  In addition, the agreement provides that Mr. Katz will have until October 5, 2010 to exercise his 444,434 options to purchase common stock of the Company.
15

Employment Agreement.

Prior to his resignation, Burton Katz was party to an Employment Agreement with us.  Theany employment agreement had a term of three years, and could be terminated by Atrinsic or Mr. Katz at any time and without any reason. A summary of the material terms of Mr. Katz’s employment agreement follows:
agreements.


Title and Salary. Mr. Katz's employment agreement provided that he would serve as our Chief Executive Officer and receive a base salary of $425,000 per annum during the term of his agreement.

Signing Bonus. As a signing bonus, Mr. Katz’s employment agreement provided that upon the execution of his employment agreement, all of the options to purchase equity securities of Atrinsic held by Mr. Katz (other than stock options to purchase 81,250 shares of common stock of Atrinsic which were issued to Mr. Katz in February 2007, and the options discussed below) automatically vested.

Annual Bonus. Mr. Katz was eligible to receive an annual bonus for each calendar year during the term of his agreement if Atrinsic's business operations met or exceeded certain financial performance standards to be determined by Atrinsic's Compensation Committee. For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008, the Compensation Committee determined the performance of Mr. Katz against two quantitative measures, EBITDA and revenues, and one qualitative measure, the Integration of Traffix, Inc. into Atrinsic. A cash bonus ranging from $0 to $637,500 could have been earned by Mr. Katz for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 depending on Mr. Katz’s performance against the aforementioned performance metrics.  For our fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, none of the quantitative measures was achieved; however, Mr. Katz earned $21,250 for successfully integrating the merger of Traffix and Atrinsic.

Benefits. Mr. Katz and his family were provided with medical, hospitalization, dental, disability and life insurance during the term of his agreement. Atrinsic paid all premiums and other costs associated with such policies. Mr. Katz also participated in all other compensation plan or other perquisites generally made available to executive officers of the company while employed by the company.

Stock Options. Upon the closing of the Merger, Mr. Katz was granted an option to purchase 300,000 shares of Atrinsic's common stock. The option was exercisable at an exercise price equal to $10.92 and was scheduled to expire on February 4, 2018. The option further provided that except in the event Mr. Katz was terminated without cause and except in the event of a termination of Mr. Katz's employment for good reason, any portion of the option that remained unvested at the time of termination would be extinguished and cancelled. Mr. Katz’s options were also subject to accelerated vesting upon a change of control.  On June 25, 2009, stockholders approved our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan and our one-time option exchange program, pursuant to which the options held by Mr. Katz to purchase 300,000 shares of our common stock were cancelled and exchanged for 100,000 restricted stock units. Upon Mr. Katz’s resignation from the company, these restricted stock units were cancelled.

Restricted Stock Units. Upon the closing of the Merger, Atrinsic agreed to issue Mr. Katz restricted stock units (“RSUs”) having a term of ten years covering 275,000 shares of common stock conditioned upon the delivery by Mr. Katz to the company of a Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, once issued, Mr. Katz’s RSUs were to first vest, with respect to 100,000 RSUs after the closing of trading on the date that the average per share trading price of our common stock during any period of 10 consecutive trading days equaled or exceeded $15. The remaining 175,000 RSUs were to vest after the closing of trading on the date that the average per share trading price of our common stock during any period of 10 consecutive trading days equaled or exceeded $20. Except in the event Mr. Katz was terminated without cause and except in the event of a termination of Mr. Katz's employment for good reason, any portion of Mr. Katz’s restricted stock units that remained unvested at the time of termination were to be forfeited, extinguished and cancelled. Mr. Katz’s restricted stock units were also subject to accelerated vesting upon a change of control.  The vesting terms of Mr. Katz’s restricted stock units were amended prior to their issuance on June 25, 2009 so that each of the aforementioned RSUs would vest after the closing of trading on the date that the average per share trading price of our common stock during any period of 10 consecutive trading days equaled or exceeded $7.50.  Upon Mr. Katz’s resignation from the company, the 275,000 restricted stock units issued to Mr. Katz on June 25, 2009 were cancelled.
16

Long Term Performance Unit Plan. Pursuant to Mr. Katz’s employment agreement, Atrinsic agreed to establish and maintain a long term executive compensation plan for the benefit of each of Mr. Katz and the other executive officers of the company. The objective of the plan was to provide for the payment of additional compensation to Mr. Katz and the other executives of the Company based upon the Company’s achievement of certain performance standards. Such performance standards were to be based upon a three to five year strategic plan for the Company. In addition, the terms of the plan were to include the nature of the compensation to be awarded, the number of units to be awarded and vesting. Due to the recent volatility in the stock market, the terms of the plan were not established by the company's Compensation Committee.

Vacation.  Mr. Katz was entitled to four weeks of vacation per annum pursuant to the terms of his agreement.

Payments upon termination. Mr. Katz’s employment agreement provided that if Mr. Katz’s employment with us was terminated because of death or disability or cause or if Mr. Katz voluntarily terminated his employment with us other than for good reason, we would pay or provide to Mr. Katz all base salary and benefits which accrued through the termination date. In addition, if Mr. Katz’s employment was terminated as a result of death or disability, Mr. Katz was to receive a sum equal to a prorated portion of the annual bonus to which Mr. Katz would have been entitled if his employment had continued until the end of the employment year in which his death or disability occurred.

The employment agreement further provided that if Mr. Katz’s employment was terminated by Mr. Katz for good reason (which included a material adverse change in the nature and scope of the duties, obligations, rights or powers of Mr. Katz’s employment, including those resulting from a change in control of the company), or by us other than for cause, we were to pay to Mr. Katz: (a) all base salary and benefits which accrued through the termination date, (b) a one time payment equal to the sum of (i) two times his base salary and (ii) two times an amount equal to the average of the annual bonus amounts received by Mr. Katz under the Employment Agreement for the 2 years prior to such termination, and (c) coverage under the employee benefit plans described above until the earlier of the end of the second anniversary of such termination or Mr. Katz’s eligibility to receive similar benefits from a new employer. In addition, the agreement provided that if Mr. Katz’s employment was terminated by Mr. Katz for good reason, or by us other than for cause, all stock options and other equity awards granted to Mr. Katz pursuant to the Employment Agreement (other than options and awards that vest upon the achievement of performance objectives) were to automatically vest, and remain exercisable for a period of one year after such termination.

Andrew Zaref

Separation Agreement.

On December 18, 2009, we entered into a Separation and Mutual Release Agreement in connection with Mr. Zaref’s resignation from the Company.  The agreement terminates the employment agreement entered into by and between the Company and Mr. Zaref dated July 14, 2008, as amended, pursuant to which the Company retained Mr. Zaref.   The agreement further provides that all 266,667 restricted stock units held by Mr. Zaref and all rights of Mr. Zaref to receive shares of common stock of the Company pursuant to such restricted stock units are terminated.

Employment Agreement.

Prior to his resignation, Andrew Zaref was party to an employment agreement with us which was entered into on July 14, 2008, pursuant to which Mr. Zaref became our new Chief Financial Officer effective July 14, 2008.  The employment agreement had a term of three years, subject to earlier termination in accordance with the terms of the employment agreement. A summary of the material terms of Mr. Zaref’s employment agreement follows:

Title and Salary. Pursuant to the terms of his agreement, Mr. Zaref served as our Chief Financial Officer and received a base salary of $400,000 per annum, which was subject to increase at the end of each year of the term at the sole discretion of our board of directors; provided, however, that such increase would be in an amount no less than 5%.

Signing Bonus. Upon the execution of the employment agreement, Mr. Zaref received a signing bonus of $100,000, which could be partially recouped by us in the event Mr. Zaref’s employment was terminated for cause by us or voluntarily by Mr. Zaref prior to the expiration of the term.
17

Annual Bonus. Mr. Zaref was eligible to receive an annual bonus in an amount not to exceed his base salary for each calendar year during the term if our business operations met or exceeded certain financial performance standards to be determined by our Compensation Committee. For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008, the Compensation Committee determined the performance of Mr. Zaref against two quantitative measures, EBITDA and revenues. A cash bonus ranging from $0 to $200,000 could have been earned by Mr. Zaref for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 depending on Mr. Zaref’s performance against the aforementioned performance metrics.  For our fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, none of the quantitative measures was achieved, and as a result Mr. Zaref did not receive a cash bonus for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.

Benefits. Mr. Zaref and his family were provided with medical, hospitalization, dental, disability and life insurance while Mr. Zaref was employed by the Company and the Company paid all premiums and other costs associated with such policies. The employment agreement also provided that Mr. Zaref would be able to participate in any other compensation plan or other perquisites generally made available to our executive officers from time to time.

Stock Options. Upon the execution of his employment agreement, Mr. Zaref was granted an option to purchase 200,000 shares of our common stock. Except in the event Mr. Zaref was terminated without cause and except in the event of a termination of Mr. Zaref’s employment by Mr. Zaref for good reason (in which case all options were to automatically vest and remain exercisable for a period of one year after such termination), any portion of Mr. Zaref’s option that remained unvested at the time of termination were to be extinguished and cancelled. Mr. Zaref’s options were subject to accelerated vesting upon a change of control.  On June 25, 2009, stockholders approved our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan and our one-time option exchange program, pursuant to which the options held by Mr. Zaref to purchase 200,000 shares of our common stock were cancelled and exchanged for 66,667 restricted stock units. Upon Mr. Zaref’s resignation from the company, these restricted stock units were cancelled.

Restricted Stock Unit Award. Pursuant to his employment agreement with us, we agreed to grant to Mr. Zaref restricted stock units having a term of ten years to acquire 200,000 shares of common stock (the “RSUs”). Once issued, Mr. Zaref’s RSUs were to first vest, with respect to 100,000 RSUs after the closing of trading on the date that the average per share trading price of our common stock during any period of 10 consecutive trading days equaled or exceeded $15. The remaining 100,000 RSUs were to vest after the closing of trading on the date that the average per share trading price of our common stock during any period of 10 consecutive trading days equaled or exceeded $20. Except in the event Mr. Zaref was terminated without cause and except in the event of a termination of Mr. Zaref's employment for good reason, any portion of Mr. Zaref’s restricted stock units that remained unvested at the time of termination were to be forfeited, extinguished and cancelled. Mr. Zaref’s restricted stock units were subject to accelerated vesting upon a change of control.  The vesting terms of Mr. Zaref’s restricted stock units were amended prior to their issuance on June 25, 2009 so that each of the aforementioned RSUs would vest after the closing of trading on the date that the average per share trading price of our common stock during any period of 10 consecutive trading days equaled or exceeded $7.50.  Upon Mr. Zaref’s resignation from the company, the 200,000 restricted stock units issued to Mr. Zaref on June 25, 2009 were cancelled.

Vacation. Mr. Zaref received four weeks of vacation per annum pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement.

Payments upon termination. Mr. Zaref’s employment agreement provided that if Mr. Zaref’s employment with us was terminated because of death or disability or cause or if Mr. Zaref voluntarily terminated his employment with us other than for good reason, we would pay or provide to Mr. Zaref all base salary and benefits which accrued through the termination date.

In addition, Mr. Zaref’s employment agreement provided that if Mr. Zaref’s employment was terminated by Mr. Zaref for good reason (which included a material adverse change in the nature and scope of the duties, obligations, rights or powers of Mr. Zaref’s employment, including those resulting from a change in control of the company), or by us other than for cause, we would pay to Mr. Zaref: (a) all base salary and benefits which accrued through the termination date, (b) a one time payment equal to the sum of (i) the base salary payable to Mr. Zaref for the greater of (x) the remaining term of the employment agreement or (y) twelve (12) months (the “Severance Period”), and (ii) an amount equal to the average of the annual bonus amounts received by Mr. Zaref under the employment agreement for the 2 years prior to such termination, and (c) coverage under the employee benefit plans described above until the earlier of the end of the Severance Period or Mr. Zaref’s eligibility to receive similar benefits from a new employer. In addition, the agreement provided that if Mr. Zaref’s employment was terminated by Mr. Zaref for good reason, or by us other than for cause, all stock options and other equity awards granted to Mr. Zaref pursuant to the employment agreement (other than options and awards that vest upon the achievement of performance objectives) were to automatically vest, and remain exercisable for a period of one year after such termination.
18

Change in Control Provisions
The prospect of a change in control of the Company can cause significant distraction and uncertainty for executive officers and, accordingly, the Committee believes that appropriate change in control provisions in the employment agreements and/or equity awards of our named executive officers are important tools for aligning executives’ interests in change in control scenarios with those of stockholders.  Please see the above summaries of each executive’s employment agreement with us for a discussion of change of control provisions included within their respective agreements.

Tax and Accounting Implications

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits to $1 million the annual tax deduction for compensation paid to each of the chief executive officer and any of the four highest paid other executive officers.  However, compensation that qualifies as performance-based compensation is deductible even in excess of $1 million.  The Board considers these requirements when designing the compensation program for the named executive officers.  The Company believes that the compensation paid to the named executive officers generally is fully deductible for federal income tax purposes.  However, in certain situations, the Compensation Committee may approve compensation that will not meet these requirements in order to ensure competitive levels of total compensation for its executive officers or for other reasons.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

On October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 was signed into law, adding section 409A to the Internal Revenue Code, which changed the tax rules applicable to nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements.  A violation of these new rules could result in the imposition of a 20% federal penalty tax on the affected executives (in addition to possible state penalties as well).  The Company believes it is operating in compliance with the statutory provisions and, through its legal counsel, monitors compliance with section 409A.

Director Compensation for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009

During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, our non-employee directors received cash compensation for their services on our board and will be issued 37,610 restricted stock units valued at $42,500 for their services as board members in 2009.  In 2009, we paid each of our non-employee directors a cash retainer of $22,500 for their service as board members.  In addition, the following board related compensation was paid to our non-executive board members in 2009: 

39
 ·Each non-executive member of our board of directors received a board meeting fee of $1,500 for each in-person meeting of our board of directors, and $500 for each telephonic meeting of our board of directors.

·Each of our non-executive directors who was a member of a committee of our board of directors received a committee meeting fee of $1,000 for each in person committee meeting and $500 for each telephonic committee meeting.

·The chairs of each of our audit and compensation committees received a cash retainer of $5,000 and the chair of our governance committee received a cash retainer of $2,500.  Members of these committees received cash retainers of $2,000 and $1000 respectively.

In addition, we reimburse directors for travel expenses associated with attendance

Outstanding Equity Awards at Board meetings; during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 such expenses were immaterial.

19

Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth information concerning directoroutstanding equity awards held by the named executive officer as of June 30, 2014.

Name Year Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
  Option
Exercise Price
($)
  Option Expiration
Date
           
Edward Gildea 2014  50,000,000(3)  0.002  February 11, 2019
Chief Executive    50,000,000(4)  0.002  February 28, 2019
Officer(1)            
             
Sebastian Giordano, 2014  125,000,000(5)  0.002  February 11, 2019
Chief Executive            
Officer(2)            

(1)Mr. Gildea was appointed Chief Executive officer effective March 1, 2014.

(2)In June 2012, Mr. Giordano was appointed as our Chief Restructuring Officer in connection with our Chapter 11 Bankruptcy reorganization. Mr. Giordano was appointed as our Chief Executive Officer in July 2013 pursuant to the confirmation of our Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan. He resigned as chief executive officer effective as of March 1, 2014.
(3)Awarded on February 11, 2014.
(4)Awarded on February 28, 2014.
(5)Awarded on February 11, 2014.

Compensation of Directors

The following table provides compensation earned by non-employee directorsinformation for the 2009 fiscal year:

Name 
Fees Earned
or
Paid in Cash
  
Stock
Awards (1)
  
All Other
Compensation
  Total 
             
Jerome Chazen (2)
 $64,250  $12,873  $-  $77,123 
Lawrence Burstein (3)
 $49,500  $4,398  $-  $53,898 
Robert Ellin (4)
 $37,000  $4,398  $-  $41,398 
Mark Dyne (5)
 $34,000  $4,398  $147,535  $185,933 
                 
(1)  Onyear ended June 25, 2009, we issued 3,892 shares of common stock to30, 2014 for each of our non-employee directors as compensation for their service on our Board prior to such date, with the exception of Mr. Chazen, who received 11,392 shares of common stock for his service as our Chairman.  The compensation in the table reflects the grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.  We plan to issue 37,610 restricted stock units valued at $42,500 to our non-executive boardindependent members for their services as board members in 2009.
(2)  Mr. Chazen held an aggregate of 11,392 stock awards and 50,000 option awards to purchase shares of our common stock as of December 31, 2009.
(3)  Mr. Burstein held an aggregate of 3,892 stock awards and 88,725 option awards to purchase shares of our common stock as of December 31, 2009.
(4)  Mr. Ellin held an aggregate of 3,892 stock awards and no option awards to purchase shares of our common stock as of December 31, 2009.
(5)  Mr. Dyne held an aggregate of 3,892 stock awards and no option awards to purchase shares of our common stock as of December 31, 2009.  Mr. Dyne currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Europlay Capital Advisors, LLC, a merchant banking and advisory firm.  On July 23, 2009 we retained Europlay Capital Advisors to provide consulting services in relation to our ShopIt service.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreementBoard.

Name Fees Earned or Paid in
Cash
  Option Awards
($)
   
(a) ($)  (1)  Total ($) 
Jonathan Schechter(2)  -   49,986   49,986 

(1)Represents stock option awards to purchase 50,000,000 shares of our common stock. Valuation is based on ASC Topic 718. The assumptions underlying valuation of equity awards are set forth in note 11 to financial statements included elsewhere in this report.
(2)At June 30, 2014, Mr. Schechter held a stock option to purchase 50,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $ .002 per share.

40

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and as reported as other compensation above, we paid Europlay Capital Advisors an aggregate of $99,135 for its services in 2009 and issued to Europlay Capital Advisors 40,000 shares of our common stock having an aggregate grant date fair value of $48,400.

20


ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Management

The following table presents information regarding the beneficial ownership of Atrinsic’sour common stock as of April 15, 2010.September 30, 2014. The number of shares in the table represents the number of shares of common stock owned by:

each person who is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock;
each of our directors;
each of our named executive officers; and
·each person who is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock;
·each of our directors;
all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
·each of our named executive officers; and
·all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that deem shares to be beneficially owned by any person who has or shares voting or investment power with respect to such shares. Shares of common stock under outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock, warrants, convertible notes or options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 15, 2010September 30, 2014 are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding such preferred stock, warrants, convertible notes or options but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other person. As a result, the percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in this table does not necessarily reflect the person’s actual ownership or voting power with respect to the number of shares of common stock actually outstanding at April 15, 2010.September 30, 2014. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons named in this table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable.

The information presented in this table is based on 20,853,933400,000,000 shares of our common stock outstanding on April 15, 2010, which excludes 2,741,318 shares held in treasury.September 30, 2014. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each of the named executive officers and directors and 5% or more shareholdersstockholders named below is c/o Atrinsic, Inc., 469 7th65 Atlantic Avenue, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10018.


Name of Beneficial Owner 
Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned
  
Percentage of
Shares Outstanding
 
       
Named Executive Officers and Directors:      
Jeffrey Schwartz (1)  59,445   * 
Andrew Stollman (2)  882,389   4.2%
Thomas Plotts (3)  31,675   * 
Mark Dyne (4)  3,508,620   16.8%
Robert Ellin (5)  1,792,695   8.6%
Raymond Musci (6)  435,821   2.1%
Lawrence Burstein (7)  94,308   * 
Jerome Chazen (8)  103,234   * 
Stuart Goldfarb  -   - 
Burton Katz (9)  444,434   2.1%
Andrew Zaref (10)  -   - 
All Named Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (11 persons) (11)  7,352,621   35.3%
         
5% Shareholders        
MPLC Holdings, LLC (3)  2,738,359   13.1%
Trinad Capital Master Fund, Ltd. (5)  1,792,695   8.6%
Destar, LLC (12)  1,237,116   5.9%
Leon G. Cooperman (13)  1,246,700   6.0%
Mercury Fund IX, Ltd (14)  1,084,155   5.2%
21

* Less than 1%Boston, Massachusetts 02110.

Name of Beneficial Owner Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned
  Percent of
Class
 
       
Edward Gildea, Chief Executive Officer and Director  100,000,000(1)  20.00%
Jonathan Schechter, Director  50,000,000(2)  11.11%
All directors and executive officers as a group (3 persons)  150,000,000(3)  27.27%
5% Stockholders:        
Sebastian Giordano  125,000,000(4)  23.81%
Hudson Bay Capital Management LP. (5)(7)  44,395,067(7)  9.99%
Iroquois Capital Management LLC(6)(7)  44,395,067(7)  9.99%
469 Holdings LLC(8)  22,693,437   5.67%
Brilliant Digital Entertainment Altent, Inc.(9)  62,519,414   15.63%
Google, Inc.(10)  100,047,815   25.01%
MediaNet Digital, Inc.(11)  20,071,696   5.02%

____________________

(1)Consists of 100,000,000 shares of common stock issuable under currently outstanding options.
(2)Consists of 50,000,000 shares of common stock issuable under currently outstanding options.
(3)Consists of an aggregate of 150,000,000 shares of common stock issuable under currently outstanding options.
(4)Consists of 125,000,000 shares of common stock issuable under currently outstanding options. Mr. Giordano resigned as chief executive officer effective March 1, 2014.

(5)Hudson Bay Capital Management LP (the “Investment Manager”) serves as the investment manager to Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd. (the “HB Fund”), in whose name the reported securities are held, and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of all shares of common stock held by the HB Fund. The principal business address of the Investment Manager and the HB Fund is 777 Third Avenue, 30th Floor, New York, New York 10017.
(6)Iroquois Capital Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Iroquois”) serves as the investment adviser that provides investment advisory services to Iroquois Master Fund Ltd. (the “Iroquois Fund”), in whose name the reported securities are held, may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of all shares of common stock held by the Iroquois Fund. The principal business address of Iroquois in 641 Lexington Avenue 26th Floor, New York, New York 10022.
(7)Consists of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock held by such stockholder. Hudson Bay Capital Management L.P. owns 2,312,834,301 shares of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Iroquois Capital Management LLC owns 2,287,165,699 shares of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. Excludes the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of all the shares of Series A Preferred Stock held by the stockholder in excess of 44,395,067 because of the “Beneficial Ownership Cap” limitation applicable to all shares of Series A Preferred Stock pursuant to which the holder thereof does not have the right to convert shares of Series A Preferred Stock to the extent that such conversion would result in beneficial ownership by the holder thereof, or any of its affiliates and any other persons or entities whose beneficial ownership of common stock would be aggregated with the holder’s for purposes of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act, of more than 9.99% of the total number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding immediately after giving effect to such conversion.
(8)The address of 469 Holdings LLC is: c/o Belkin Burden Wenig & Goldman, Attn: S. Stewart Smith, Esq. 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016.
(9)The address of Brilliant Digital Entertainment Altent, Inc. is: 12711 Ventura Blvd., Suite 210, Studio City, CA 91604.
(10)The address of Google, Inc. is: PO Box 39000, San Francisco, CA 94139.
(11)The address of MediaNet Digital, Inc. is: 1697 Broadway, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10019.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

Policies and Corporate Governance

The Board has adopted a resolution that, in the future, any transactions between us and another person or entity who is deemed to be an “affiliate” or a related party must be approved by a majority of our outstanding shares


(1)           Includes 3,892 shares of Common Stock and 55,553 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options held by Mr. Schwartz.
(2)           Includes 446,324 shares of common stock and 436,065 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options held by Mr. Stollman.
(3)           Includes 5,009 shares of Common Stock, 25,000 shares of vested restricted stock units and 1,666 shares of vested restricted stock held by Mr. Plotts.
(4)           Includes 3,892 shares of Common Stock held directly by Mr. Dyne, 2,738,359 shares of Common Stock held by MPLC Holdings, LLC of which Mr. Dyne is
Manager, and 766,369 shares held by Europlay Capital Advisors, LLC, of which Mr. Dyne is the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman.  Mr. Dyne disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of common stock directly beneficially owned by MPLC Holdings, LLC and Europlay Capital Advisors, LLC except to the extent of his pecuniary interests therein. The address of each of Mr. Dyne, MPLC Holdings, LLC and Europlay Capital Advisors, LLC are 15260 Ventura Boulevard, 20th Floor, Sherman Oaks, CA 91403.
(6)           Consists of 435,821 shares of Common Stock.
(7)           Includes 14,033 shares of Common Stock and 80,275 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options held by Mr. Burstein.
(8)           Includes 53,234 shares of Common Stock and 50,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options held by Mr. Chazen.
(9)           Consists of 444,434 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options held by Mr. Katz.  Mr. Katz resigned from the company on October 6, 2009.
(10)           Mr. Zaref resigned from his position as Chief Financial Officer on December 16, 2009.
(11)           Includes 6,259,628 shares of Common Stock, 1,666 shares of Restricted Common Stock, 25,000 shares of restricted stock units and 1,066,327 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options held by our executive officers anddisinterested directors. See footnotes (1) through (10) above.
(12)           David E. Smith exercises voting and dispositive power over these shares. While Trinad Management, LLC has an economic interest in Destar, LLC, it has no power to vote or dispose of the shares held by Destar, LLC and, accordingly, disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by Destar, LLC except to the extent of its pecuniary interest therein. The address of Destar, LLC is 2450 Colorado Avenue, Suite 100, East Tower, Santa Monica, CA 90404.
(13)           Consists of 46,700 shares owned by Mr. Cooperman and 1,200,000 shares held by Watchung Road Associates.  Mr. Cooperman is the general partner of Watchung Road Associates, a limited partnership organized under the laws of the State of New Jersey, and in such capacity has the sole power to vote and dispose of the shares held by Watchung Road Associates.  The address of the principal business office of Mr. Cooperman is 88 Pine Street, Wall Street Plaza, 31st  Floor, New York, NY 10005.  The address of the principal business office of Watchung Road Associates is 820 Morris Turnpike, Short Hills NJ 07078.
(14)           Consists of 1,084,155 shares of Common Stock.  Kevin C. Howe exercises voting and disposition power over such shares on behalf of Mercury Management, L.L.C., the General Partner of Mercury Ventures II, Ltd. ("Mercury Ventures II"), which is the General Partner of Mercury Fund IX, Ltd. ("Mercury IX").  The principal business office of Mercury IX, Mercury Ventures II, Mercury Management and Mr. Howe is 501 Park Lake Drive, McKinney, Texas 75070.

Changes in Control
We do not have any arrangements which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control. 
22

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2009.
  Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights  Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights  Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans 
          
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  1,514,060  $7.28   3,431,966 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  677,627  $3.74   -- 
Total  2,191,687       3,431,966 

Material Features of Individual Equity Compensation Plans not Approved by Stockholders

On August 3, 2006, Burton Katz was granted an option to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock of New Motion Mobile, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary, at a per share exercise price of $3.40. Subsequent to the exchange transaction in which we acquired New Motion Mobile, Inc., this option entitles Mr. Katz to purchase 363,184 shares of our common stock at a per share exercise price of $2.34. This option is fully vested and is exercisable by Mr. Katz prior to October 5, 2010.

In 2006, we issued Secured Convertible Notes to Scott Walker, our former Chief Executive Officer, and SGE, a corporation owned by Allan Legator, our former Chief Financial Officer.  These Secured Convertible Notes were repaid in full

Transactions with interest in September 2006.  Related Persons

Pursuant to the terms of a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement dated July, 2013, we acquired a 51% equity interest in Momspot in exchange for our commitment to contribute up to $165,000 of working capital to Momspot over a two-year period to fund its business development and operations. Simultaneous with the Secured Convertible Notes, on January 26, 2007, Scott Walker was grantedacquisition, we became a warrantparty to purchase 14,382 shares of common stock atthe Momspot, LLC Operating Agreement and the manager thereunder. B.E. Global LLC, an exercise price of $3.44 per share and SGE was granted a warrant to purchase 9,152 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.44 per share.  The per share fair market valueentity controlled by Barry Eisenberg, owns the remaining 49% of the company’s common stock on January 26, 2007 was $3.44. 


Inequity interest in Momspot.

Pursuant to a Letter of Agreement dated August 1, 2013 with Chord Advisors, LLC (“Chord”) we engaged Chord to provide us with accounting policy and financial reporting and bookkeeping services. Further, as of July 1, 2014, David Horin, one of the principals of Chord, assumed the role of our principal accounting officer. The Letter of Agreement has a term of twelve months and provides for us to pay to Chord: (i) $500 per month for our basic accounting functionality and $500 per month for Momspot’s basic accounting functionality; (ii) a flat fee of $7,500 for services rendered in connection with the company’s Series A, Bpreparation of our Registration Statement on Form 10 filed July 2, 2014; and D Preferred Stock financings which occurred in late 2006 and early 2007, Sanders Morris Harris, Inc. acted as placement agent.  For its services,(iii) $6,000 per month upon the company paid Sanders Morris Harris a cash fee equal to 7.5%commencing September 1, 2014, the effective date of the gross proceeds from the financingForm 10 Registration Statement.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and five year warrants to purchase 290,909 shares of common stock at an average exercise price of $5.50 per share, which was equivalent to the average per share valuation of the companyServices

The aggregate fees billed by our principal accounting firm, Marcum, LLP, for the Series A, Bfiscal years ended June 30, 2014 and D Preferred Stock financings.



23


ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Other than the employment arrangements described elsewhere in this report and the transactions described below, since January 1, 2008, there has not been, nor is there currently proposed, any transaction or series of similar transactions to which we were or will be a party:
2013 are as follows:

·(a)in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000; and
Audit Fees
·in which any director, executive officer, stockholder who beneficially owns 5% or more of our common stock or any member of their immediate family had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Mr. Dyne has served as a director of the company since November 11, 2008.  Mr. Dyne currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Europlay Capital Advisors, LLC, a merchant banking and advisory firm.  Europlay Capital Advisors acted as our non-exclusive financial advisor in connection with our merger with Traffix, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which closed on February 4, 2008.  Europlay Capital Advisors received a fee of $150,000

2014

The aggregate fees incurred during fiscal 2014 for its financial advisory and investment banking services which it provided to us during the course of the transaction.  As a result of the merger, Traffix, Inc. became our wholly-owned subsidiary. In addition, we retained Europlay Capital Advisors on July 23, 2009 to provide consulting services in relation to our ShopIt service.  The agreement expired on January 31, 2010.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, we paid Europlay Capital Advisors an aggregate of $99,135 for its services and issued to Europlay Capital Advisors 40,000 shares of our common stock.


Transactions with Promoters and Control Persons

Prior to February 12, 2007, MPLC (now called Atrinsic, Inc.) existed as a “shell company” with nominal assets whose sole business was to identify, evaluate and investigate various companies to acquire or with which to merge. On February 12, 2007, we consummated an exchange transaction in which we acquired all of the outstanding ownership interests of New Motion Mobile, Inc. (formerly called New Motion, Inc.), a Delaware corporation from its stockholders in exchange for an aggregate of 500,000 shares of our Series C Preferred Stock. At the closing of the exchange transaction, New Motion Mobile became our wholly owned subsidiary. The exchange transaction was accounted for as a reverse merger (recapitalization) with New Motion Mobile deemed to be the accounting acquirer, and MPLC the legal acquirer.

On October 24, 2006, MPLC and certain of its stockholders entered into a common stock Purchase Agreement with Trinad, pursuant to which MPLC agreed to redeem 23,448,870 shares of common stock (on a pre-reverse stock split basis) from the stockholders and sell an aggregate of 69,750,000 shares of our common stock (on a pre-reverse stock split basis), representing 93% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock on the closing date, to Trinad in a private placement transaction for aggregate gross proceeds to us of $750,000, $547,720 of which was used for the redemption described above, and $202,280 was used to repay all loans to MPLC from Isaac Kier, a former director and the former president, treasurer and secretary of MPLC.  Mr. Ellin was the former Chief Executive Officer of MPLC, Inc. and resigned from this position on February 12, 2007 upon the closing of the exchange transaction.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
On January 30, 2009, we appointed KPMG, LLP as our new independent registered public accounting firm following the resignation of McGladrey and PullenMarcum, LLP, our former auditors, on January 21, 2009.  We originally engaged McGladrey & Pullen LLP as our independent registered publicprincipal accountant, on May 7, 2008.  Prior to their resignation, McGladrey and Pullen LLP had not commenced any procedures with regard to the December 31, 2008 audit nor did they report on our consolidated financial statements during their engagement.
Prior to May 7, 2008, Windes & McClaughry was engaged as our principal independent accounting firm and reported on our December 31, 2007 consolidation financial statements.  Prior to February 12, 2007, our principal auditors were Carlin, Charron & Rosen, LLP.
The following table sets forth fees billed to us by our auditors, KPMG, LLP during fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 and 2008: 
24



  December 31, 2009  December 31, 2008 
Audit Fees (1)
 $$375,000  $$285,000 
Audit-related fees (2)
 $5,000   - 
Tax fees (3)
  -   - 
All other fees  -   - 
Total $$380,000  $$285,000 

(1)           Audit fees include$51,000, covering the audit of our annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in our Form 10-Q quarterly reports, and services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years. This category also includes advice on accounting matters that arose during, or as a result of, the audit or the review of interim financial statements.
(2)           Audit related fees consist of assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements for the nine months ended March 31, 2014.

2013

The aggregate fees incurred during fiscal 2013 for Marcum, LLP, our principal accountant, were $60,000, covering the audit of our annual financial statements and are not reported above under audit fees. No such fees were incurredthe review of our financial statements for fiscal 2008.  year 2013 and 2012.

42

(b)Audit-Related Fees

There were no audit-related fees billed by Marcum, LLP, our principal accountant during fiscal 2014.

(c)Tax Fees

There were no tax fees billed by our principal accountants in fiscal 2014.

(d)All Other Fees

No other fees, beyond those disclosed in this Item 14, were billed during fiscal 2014.

Audit related fees incurred in 2009 related to the company’s preparationCommittee Pre-Approval, Policies and filing of its Registration Statement on Form S-8.

(3)           Tax fees consist of tax services for tax compliance and tax preparation plus tax services relating to a study to determine the extent that research and development credits can be claimed on our corporate tax returns.  No such fees were incurred for fiscal 2008 or 2009.

Procedures

Our Audit Committee is directly responsible for interviewing and retaining our independent accountant, considering the accounting firm’s independence and effectiveness, and pre-approvingapproved the engagement fees and other compensation to be paid to, andwith Marcum, LLP, our principal accountant, in advance. In addition the Audit Committee approved tax services to be conducted(as described above) provided by the independent accountant. During each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively,Marcum, LLP. These services were pre-approved by our Audit Committee pre-approved 100%to assure that such services do not impair the auditor’s independence from us.

The percentage of the services described above.



25



hours expended on audit by persons other than our principal accountant’s full time, permanent employees, did not exceed 50%.

Part IV

ITEMItem 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Financial Statements and Schedules and Exhibits

Exhibit
Number
(a)Exhibit Title1. Financial Statements -See the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements below, beginning on page F-1.
2.Financial Statement Schedules – See (c) below.
3.Exhibits– See (b) below.
   
(b)Exhibits

Exhibit NumbersDescription
2.1Second Amended Plan of Reorganization, dated March 7, 2013
2.2Order Confirming Second Amended Plan of Reorganization, dated June 26, 2013
3.1(a)Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed on July 9, 2013
3.1(b)Certificate of Designations, Series A Convertible Preferred Stock filed on July 9, 2013
3.1(c)Certificate of Correction of Certificate of Designations of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock filed on October 29, 2013
3.2By-Laws(1)
10.1Form of Option Agreement between the Company and each of Edward Gildea, Sebastian Giordano, and Jonathan Schechter†
10.2**Consulting Agreement between the Company and Chord Advisors LLC
10.3Momspot Membership Interest Purchase Agreement entered into as of July 12, 2013
10.4Momspot Operating Agreement entered into as of July 12, 2013
10.5Momspot Contribution Agreement entered into as of July 12, 2013
10.6Lock-up Agreement among Atrinsic, Inc. and each of the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock, effective as of July 12, 2013
10.7Form of Indemnification Agreement
10.8Amended and Restated Promissory Note dated February 11, 2014 issued by the Company to Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd.
10.9Amended and Restated Promissory Note dated February 11, 2014 issued by the Company to Iroquois Master Fund Ltd.
10.10Security Agreement dated February 11, 2014 by and among the Company, Iroquois Master Fund Ltd, and Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd.
10.11Promissory Note dated August 15, 2014 issued by the Company to Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd.
10.12Promissory Note dated August 15, 2014 issued by the Company to Iroquois Master Fund Ltd.

31.1 Certification by PrincipalChief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)Certification as required under section 302 of the Securities ExchangeSarbanes Oxley Act of 1934, as amended.(*€)
31.2 Certification by PrincipalChief Financial Officer Certification as required under section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act (*€)
32.1*Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)18 U.S.C. section 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act *
101.INSXBRL Instance Document (2)
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (2)
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (2)
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (2)
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (2)
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (2)

† Filed as an Exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form 10, dated July 2, 2014 and as amended August 18, 2014, and incorporated hereunder by reference.

* Furnished, not filed, in accordance with item 601(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

** This exhibit is a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

*€ Filed herewith.

(1) Filed on June 10, 2005 as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registration Statement on Form 10-SB and incorporated herein by reference.

(2) Furnished with this report. In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in these exhibits shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

(c)Financial Statement Schedules- No financial statement schedules are included because the information is either provided in the financial statements or 15d-14(a)is not required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.related instructions or is inapplicable and such schedules therefore have been omitted.

44


26


SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrantregistrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


 Atrinsic, Inc.ATRINSIC, INC.
 
Date: October 14, 2014By:/s/ Thomas PlottsEDWARD GILDEA
 
By: Thomas Plotts
Its: Chief Financial Officer (Interim)
Name:
Edward Gildea
 Date: April 30, 2010Title:Chief Executive Officer
POWER OF ATTORNEY
In accordance with

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been duly signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrantregistrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

NameSignature Title Date
     
/s/  Jeffrey Schwartz  EDWARD GILDEA Chief Executive Officer and Director, April 30, 2010October 14, 2014
Jeffrey SchwartzEdward Gildea (Principal Executive Officer)  
     
/s/  Thomas Plotts  DAVID HORIN Chief Financial Officer (Interim) April 30, 2010October 14, 2014
Thomas PlottsDavid Horin (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)  
     
*  /s/  JONATHAN SCHECHTER Director April 30, 2010October 14, 2014
Raymond MusciJonathan Schechter   

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Atrinsic, Inc.

Years Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (audited)

Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-2
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets - June 30, 2014 (Successor Company) and 2013 (Predecessor Company)F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods from July 12, 2013 to June 30, 2014 (Successor Company), Eleven Days ended July 11, 2013 (Predecessor Company), and Year Ended June 30, 2013 (Predecessor Company)F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity/Deficiency for the periods from July 12, 2013 to June 30, 2014 (Successor Company), Eleven Days ended July 11, 2013 (Predecessor Company), and the Years Ended June 30, 2013and 2012 (Predecessor Company)F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the periods from July 12, 2013 to June 30, 2014 (Successor Company), Eleven Days ended July 11, 2013 (Predecessor Company), and the Years Ended June 30, 2013F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-7

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

of Atrinsic, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Atrinsic, Inc.(the “Company”) as of June 30, 2014 (Successor Company) and 2013 (Predecessor Company), and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficiency and cash flows for the periods from July 12, 2013 to June 30, 2014 (Successor Company), eleven days ended July 11, 2013 (Predecessor Company), and the year ended June 30, 2013 (Predecessor Company). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Atrinsic, Inc. as of June 30, 2014 (Successor Company) and 2013 (Predecessor Company), and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the periods from July 12, 2013 to June 30, 2014 (Successor Company), eleven days ended July 11, 2013 (Predecessor Company), and the year ended June 30, 2013 (Predecessor Company) in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As more fully described in Note 1, on June 26, 2013, the Company emerged from Chapter 11 and on July 12, 2013 adopted fresh start accounting. The Company has continued to incur net losses through June 30, 2014 and have yet to establish profitable operations. These factors among others create a substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

/s/ Marcum LLP

Marcumllp

New York, NY

October 14, 2014

ATRINSIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands except share data)

 Successor Company Predecessor Company 
 June 30, June 30, 
 2014 2013 
ASSETS      
Current assets      
Cash$101 $717 
Prepaid insurance 144  237 
 Total current assets 245  954 
       
 Property and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation of $0) 1  - 
Total assets$246 $954 
       
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT      
Current liabilities      
Accounts payable$138 $15,566 
Accrued interest expense - stockholders 3  - 
Notes payable -  2,614 
Total current liabilities 141  18,180 
Notes payable - due to stockholders 175  - 
Total liabilities 316  18,180 
       
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES -  - 
       
Shareholders' deficit:      
Series A convertible preferred stock, $0.000001 par value, 5,000,000,000 shares authorized,4,600,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014; no shares issued or outstanding at June 30, 2013; ( Liquidation preference 20,700,000 as of June 30, 2014) 5  - 
Common stock, $.000001 par value, 100,000,000,000 shares authorized, 400,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014; par value $0.01, 100,000,000 authorized and outstanding at June 30, 2013. -  1,000 
Additional paid-in capital 1,053  182,281 
Common stock, held in treasury, at cost, 0 and 681,509 shares at June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively -  (4,981)
Accumulated deficit (1,079) (195,526)
Shareholders' deficit attributed to Atrinsic, Inc. (21) (17,226)
       
Non-controlling interest (49) - 
Total shareholders' deficit (70) (17,226)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT$246 $954 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

F-3

ATRINSIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

 Successor Company  Predecessor Company 
 For the period from
July 12, 2013 to
  For the period from
July 1, 2013 to
 For the year ended
 
 June 30,  July 11, June 30, 
 2014  2013 2013 
Revenues$-   - $85 
           
Operating expenses          
General and administrative$975   - $758 
 Total operating expenses 975   -  758 
Loss from operations (975)  -  (673)
           
Other income (expenses)          
    Other income 59   -  - 
Interest expenses - stockholders (3)  -  - 
Other expenses (5)  -  (133)
Net loss before reorganization items (924)  -  (806)
           
Reorganization items          
Gain on reorganization, net -   778  - 
Legal and professional fees (204)  -  (221)
Total reorganization items (204)  778  (221)
Net (loss) income (1,128)  778  (1,027)
           
Less: net loss attributable to non-controlling interest (49)  -  - 
Net (loss) income attributable to Atrinsic$(1,079) $778 $(1,027)
           
Net loss per share attributable to Atrinsic common stockholders          
Basic$(0.00) $0.01 $(0.01)
Diluted$(0.00) $0.01 $(0.01)
           
Weighted average shares outstanding:          
Basic 400,000,000   100,000,000  100,000,000 
Diluted 400,000,000   100,000,000  100,000,000 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

ATRINSIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

 Convertible   Additional   Accumulated Other      
 Preferred Stock Common Stock Paid-In Accumulated Comprehensive Treasury Stock Noncontrolling Total 
 Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Deficit Loss Shares Amount Interest Equity (Deficiency) 
Balance at June 30, 2012 (Predecessor Company) - $-  100,000,000 $1,000 $182,250 $(194,513)$14  681,509 $(4,981)$- $(16,230)
Net loss -  -  -  -  -  (1,027) -  -  -  -  (1,027)
Foreign currency translation adjustment -  -  -  -  -  14  (14) -  -  -  - 
Capital infusion -  -  -  -  31  -  -  -  -  -  31 
Balance at June 30, 2013 (Predecessor Company) - $-  100,000,000 $1,000 $182,281 $(195,526$-  681,509 $(4,981)$- $17,226 
Cancellation of predecessor company common stock -  -  (100,000,000) (1,000) -  -  -  -  -  -  (1,000)
Elimination of predecessor company capital in excess of par -  -  -  -  (182,281) -  -  -  -  -  (182,281)
Elimination of predecessor company accumulated deficit -  -  -  -  -  195,526  -  -  -  -  195,526 
Elimination of predecessor company treasury stock -  -  -  -  -  -  -  (681,509) 4,981  -  4,981 
Issuance of predecessor company convertible preferred stock 4,600,000,000  5  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  5 
Issuance of predecessor company common stock       400,000,000     -  -  -  -  -  -  - 
Gain from reorganization -  -  -  -  -  778  -  -  -  -  778 
Elimination of predecessor company accumulated deficit -  -  -  -  778  (778) -  -  -  -  - 
Balance at July 11, 2013 (Predecessor Company) 4,600,000,000 $5  400,000,000 $- $778 $- $-  - $- $- $783 
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  (49) (49)
Net loss attributable to Atrinsic -  -  -  -  -  (1,079) -  -  -  -  (1,079)
Stock-based compensation -  -  -  -  275  -  -  -  -  -  275 
Balance at June 30, 2014 (Successor Company) 4,600,000,000 $5  400,000,000$-$1,053$(1,079)$- -$-$(49)$(70)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

F-5

ATRINSIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended June 30,

(Dollars in thousands)

 Successor Company  Predecessor Company 
 For the periods from
July 12, 2013 to
  For the period from
July 1, 2013 to
 Fiscal year ended 
 June 30,  July 11, June 30, 
 2014  2013 2013 
Cash flows from operating activities          
Net income (loss)$(1,079) $778 $(1,027)
           
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:          
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiary (49)  -  - 
Non-cash reorganization items -   (778) - 
Accrued interest on notes payable 3   -  - 
Stock-based compensation 275   -  - 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities of business, net of acquisitions:          
Accounts receivable, net -   -  308 
Prepaid insurance 93   -  207 
Other non-current assets -   -  487 
Accounts payable, excluding reorganization items (33)  -  (292)
Other long-term liabilities -   -  (7)
Net cash used in operating activities (790)  -  (324)
           
Cash flows from investing activities          
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets -   -  15 
Purchase of property and equipment (1)  -  - 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (1)  -  15 
           
Cash flows from financing activities          
Proceeds from issuance of note payable 175   -  - 
Capital infusion -   -  31 
Net cash provided by financing activities 175   -  31 
           
Net decrease in cash (616)  -  (278)
Cash at beginning of period 717   717  995 
Cash at end of period$101  $717 $717 
           
Supplemental reorganization items          
Payment for reorganization items$-  $- $221 
Income taxes paid$-   -  - 
Interest paid$-   -  - 

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

F-6

ATRINSIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Prior to filing Chapter 11 on June 15, 2012, the Company was a direct marketing company based in the United States. The Company had two main service offerings: (i) transactional services; and (ii) Subscription services. Transactional services offered full service online marketing and distribution services which were targeted and measurable online campaigns and programs for marketing partners, corporate advertisers, or their agencies, generating qualified customer leads, online responses and activities, or increased brand recognition. Subscription services offered a portfolio of subscription based content applications direct to users working with wireless carriers and other distributors.

On June 15, 2012, the Company filed Chapter 11 in the United States Bankruptcy Court in Southern District of New York (Case No. 12-12553). As of that date, the Company terminated all remaining employees, and ceased its normal business operations.

The Company emerged from Chapter 11 on June 26, 2013, at which time the Plan of Reorganization was conditionally confirmed by the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York. The confirmation was subject to the consummation of the Company’s acquisition of a 51% controlling interest in Momspot LLC (“Momspot”), which was subsequently completed on July 12, 2013 (“Emergence Date”). Momspot’s goal is to be the premier specialty retail affiliate marketing company targeting women between the ages of 24 and 45 who are either mothers or expecting their first child. The Emergence Date was the date the Company adopted fresh start accounting in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 852. The adoption of fresh-start accounting resulted in the Company becoming a new entity for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, the financial statements on or prior to July 12, 2013 are not comparable with the financial statements for periods after July 12, 2013.

NOTE 2 – LIQUIDITY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

The Company intends to finance its activities through:

·managing current cash on hand,
·seeking additional funds raised in the future,

The Company’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2014 indicate there is substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern as the Company is dependent on its ability to retain short term financing and ultimately to generate sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations on a timely basis in order to attain profitability, as well as successfully obtain financing on favorable terms to fund the Company’s long term plans. The Company continually projects anticipated cash requirements, which may include business combinations, capital expenditures, and working capital requirements. In accordance with the Plan of Reorganization, most of the Company’s accounts payable were converted into Equity, which had a favorable impact on liquidity. As of June 30, 2014, the Company had cash of approximately $101, and a working capital deficit of approximately $71 including note payable to stockholders due July 2015. During the period from July 12, 2013 through June 30, 2014, the Company used approximately $790 of cash for operations. The Company’s existing liquidity is not sufficient to fund its operations, anticipated capital expenditures, working capital and other financing requirements for the foreseeable future.

The Company needs to raise additional capital to cover its budgeted operating and capital expenditures. If the capital raising efforts are not successful, the Company might not be able to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be not able to continue as a going concern. These factors among others create a substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The ownership of more than 50% of the voting stock of an entity creates a subsidiary. The financial statements of the parent and subsidiary are consolidated for reporting purposes.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all majority and wholly-owned (“Momspot”) subsidiaries and significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

ATRINSIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management continually evaluates its estimates and judgments including those related to fair value of stock options granted and income taxes. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and other factors that are believed to be reasonable in the circumstances. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Macroeconomic conditions may directly, or indirectly through the Company’s business partners and vendors, impact the Company’s financial performance and available resources. Such conditions may, in turn, impact the aforementioned estimates and assumptions.

Cash

For the purposes of reporting cash flows, the Company considers all cash accounts which are not subject to withdrawal restrictions or penalties, and highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less when purchased to be cash.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consist of computer hardware, software and office equipment as of June 30, 2014. Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. The estimated useful lives range from three to fifteen years.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company records stock based compensation in accordance with ASC 718. In estimating the grant date fair value of stock option awards and performance based restricted stock, the Company uses the Black Scholes option pricing model and other binomial pricing models where appropriate. The key assumptions for these models to derive fair value include expected term, rate of risk free returns and volatility. Information about the Company’s specific award plans can be found in Note 5.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to ASC 740. Under ASC 740, deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carryforwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.  

The Company adopted an accounting standard which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial statements. This standard provides guidance on recognizing, measuring, presenting and disclosing in the financial statements uncertain tax positions that a company has taken or expects to take on a tax return.

Fair Value Measurement

The fair value of Momspot, which was not material, was determined based on valuation performed by Management, which took into consideration, where applicable, cash received , market participant inputs, estimated cash flows based on entity specific criteria, purchase multiples paid in other comparable third-party transactions, market conditions, liquidity, operating results and other qualitative and quantitative factors.

Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing reported earnings by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS includes the effect, if any, of the potential issuance of additional shares of common stock as a result of the exercise or conversion of dilutive securities, using the treasury stock method.

Potential dilutive securities for the Company include outstanding stock options and warrants.

Securities that could potentially dilute loss per share in the future that were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share at June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013, because such securities are anti-dilutive, are as follows:

ATRINSIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

 As of June 30, 
 2014 2013 
Convertible preferred shares 4,600,000,000  4,600,000,000 
Options to purchase common stock 275,000,000  - 
Total 4,875,000,000  4,600,000,000 

Preferred Stock

The Company applies the accounting standards for distinguishing liabilities from equity when determining the classification and measurement of its preferred stock. Preferred shares subject to mandatory redemption are classified as liability instruments and are measured at fair value. Conditionally redeemable preferred shares (including preferred shares that feature redemption rights that are either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within the Company’s control) are classified as temporary equity. Therefore, preferred shares are classified as stockholders’ equity. The preferred shares are not mandatorily redeemable and has no conditional redemption features.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are charged to operations as incurred. During the period from July 12, 2013 to June 30, 2014, the total research and development expenses were approximately $42 for web design, infrastructure, graphic and content development.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash. The Company reduces credit risk by placing its cash with major financial institutions. At times, such amounts may exceed federally insured limits.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements. ASU 2014-10 eliminates the distinction of a development stage entity and certain related disclosure requirements, including the elimination of inception-to-date information on the statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders’ equity. The amendments in ASU 2014-10 will be effective prospectively for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those annual periods, however early adoption is permitted. The Company elected to adopt this ASU effective with its Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with SEC on July 2, 2014. The adoption resulted in the removal of previously required developmental stage disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15 on “Presentation of Financial Statements Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) - Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. Currently, there is no guidance in U.S. GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this ASU provide that guidance. In doing so, the amendments are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this ASU are effective for public and nonpublic entities for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2014-15 on the consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 4 - FRESH START ACCOUNTING

On July 12, 2013, the Company adopted fresh start accounting and reporting in accordance with Topic ASC 852. The Company was required to apply the provisions of fresh start reporting to its financial statements, as the holders of existing voting shares of the Predecessor Company received less than 50% of the voting shares of the emerging entity and the reorganization value of the Predecessor Company’s assets immediately before the date of confirmation was less than the post-petition liabilities and allowed claims.

ATRINSIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

Fresh start reporting generally requires resetting the historical net book value of assets and liabilities to fair value as of the Effective Date by allocating the entity’s enterprise value as set forth in the Reorganization Plan to its assets and liabilities pursuant to accounting guidance related to business combinations. The financial statements as of the Effective Date report the results of the Successor Company with no beginning retained earnings or accumulated deficit. Any presentation of the Successor Company represents the financial position and results of operations of a new reporting entity and is not comparable to prior periods. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for periods ended prior to the Effective Date do not include the effect of any changes in capital structure or changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities as a result of fresh start accounting.

In accordance with ASC Topic 852, the Predecessor Company’s pre-emergence charges to earnings of $778, recorded as reorganization items result from certain costs and expenses relating to the Reorganization Plan becoming effective, including the cancellation of certain debt upon issuance of new equity.

Methodology, Analysis and Assumptions

The Company determined that the fair value of the Company (“Reorganization Value”) on the Effective date to be minimal.

The Company’s valuation was based upon a discounted cash flow methodology, which included a calculation of the present value of expected un-levered after-tax free cash flows reflected in the Company’s long-term financial projections, including the calculation of the present value of the terminal value of cash flows, and supporting analysis that included a comparison of selected financial data of the Company with similar data of other publicly held companies comparable to ours in terms of end markets, operational characteristics, growth prospects and geographical footprint. The Company also considered precedent transaction analysis but ultimately determined there was insufficient data for a meaningful analysis.

 July 12, 2013 
 Predecessor
Company
 Reorganization
Adjustments
 Successor Company 
ASSETS         
Current assets         
Cash and cash equivalents$717 $- $717 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 237     237 
Total current assets 954  -  954 
TOTAL ASSETS$954 $- $954 
          
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY         
Current liabilities         
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$15,566 $(15,395)2)$171 
Note payable 2,614  (2,614)3) - 
Total current liabilities 18,180  (18,009) 171 
TOTAL LIABILITIES 18,180  (18,009) 171 
          
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES -  -  - 
          
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY/ DEFICIENCY         
Convertible preferred stock - par value $.000001, 5,000,000,000 shares authorized, 4,600,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at July 11, 2013; no shares authorized, issued or outstanding at June 30, 2013 -  53) 5 
Common stock - par value $.000001, 100,000,000,000 shares authorized, 400,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at July 11, 2013; par value $.01, 100,000,000 authorized and outstanding at June 30, 2013. 1,000  (1,000)1) - 
Additional paid-in capital 182,281  (182,281)4) - 
     7785) 778 
Common stock, held in treasury, at cost, 0 and 681,509 shares at July 11, 2013 and June 30, 2013, respectively. (4,981) 4,9814) - 
Accumulated income (deficit) (195,526) 195,5261) - 
        
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY/ DEFICIENCY (17,226) 18,009  783 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY/ DEFICIENCY$954 $- $954 

1) To reduce the total par value of stock held by the pre-petition stockholders to $100, in accordance with the new post-bankruptcy capital structure

2) To record conversion of pre-petition Accounts Payable to 300,000,000, $0.000001 par value common shares, in accordance with the new post-bankruptcy capital structure

3) To record conversion of note payable to 4,600,000,000, $0.000001 par value shares of convertible preferred stock, in accordance with the new post-bankruptcy petition capital structure

4) To eliminate Treasury Stock. APIC and Accumulated Deficit as of July 11, 2013

5) Elimination of Predecessor Company accumulated deficit July 1, 2013 to July 11, 2013

F-10

ATRINSIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

NOTE 5 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

On July 12, 2013, the Company established a new capital structure, in accordance with the Plan of Reorganization.

Accordingly, 100,000,000,000 shares of $0.000001 par value common stock were authorized. The Company exchanged the 100,000,000 outstanding shares held by the pre-bankruptcy petition stockholders for 100,000,000 $0.000001 par value shares in the reorganized Company. The Company also issued 300,000,000 of the authorized shares to the unsecured creditors of the Company   subsequent to the filing bankruptcy.  The 400,000,000 aggregate shares issued were outstanding at the time of filing bankruptcy. The 400,000,000 aggregate shares issued were outstanding at June 30, 2014.

In addition, the Company authorized 5,000,000,000 shares of $0.000001 par value preferred stock. The Company applies the accounting standards for distinguishing liabilities from equity when determining the classification and measurement of its preferred stock. Preferred shares subject to mandatory redemption are classified as liability instruments and are measured at fair value. Conditionally redeemable preferred shares (including preferred shares that feature redemption rights that are either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within the Company’s control) are classified as temporary equity. At all other times, preferred shares are classified as stockholders’ equity. 4,600,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock were issued to the Company’s secured creditors in exchange for the Convertible Notes that were previously issued to them in May 2011. The 4,600,000,000 shares issued were outstanding as of June 30, 2014. Each share of Convertible Preferred stock is convertible into one share of common stock.

As of June 30, 2014, 4,600,000,000 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding, and are held of record by two holders. The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock each have the right at any time, at the holder’s option, to convert any or all of his shares of Series A Preferred Stock into such number of fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock to the extent that such conversion would not result in beneficial ownership by the holder of more than 9.99% of the total number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding immediately after giving effect to such conversion (the “Beneficial Ownership Cap”). Subject to the Beneficial Ownership Cap, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to vote on an as-converted basis together with the holders of the Company’s common stock as a class on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. Holders of the Series A Preferred Stock do not have cumulative voting rights. On an as-converted basis, the holders are entitled to any dividends that may be declared on the Company’s common stock by the board of directors without regard to the Beneficial Ownership Cap. Upon the Company’s dissolution, liquidation or winding up, after payment or provision for all liabilities and any preferential liquidation rights of any shares of a more senior class of the preferred stock that the Company may issue in the future, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock shall have priority with respect to the distribution of the Company’s net assets over the holders of its common stock. All outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock are fully paid and non-assessable. From July 12, 2013 through July 12, 2014, each Holder of the Series A Preferred Stock is prohibited from selling or otherwise transferring more than 2.5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock, calculated on a fully diluted basis, per 90-day period.

Stock Options

On February 11, 2014, the Company issued options with a term of five (5) years and an exercise price of $0.002 to the individuals below for the number of shares of common stock:

ATRINSIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

The Company granted to Sebastian Giordano, for services as Chief Restructuring Officer and Acting Chief Executive Officer, an option to purchase 125,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock.

The Company granted to each of Edward Gildea and Jonathan Schechter, for services as directors of the Company, an option to purchase 50,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock.

On February 28, 2014, the Company granted to Edward Gildea, for services to be rendered as Acting Chief Executive Officer, an option to purchase 50,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with a term of five (5) years and an exercise price of $0.002.

All of the shares covered by these options shall immediately vest on the grant date.

The grant date fair value of stock options granted at June 30, 2014 was approximately $275. The fair value of the Company’s common stock was based upon the publicly quoted price on the date of grant. The expected term for stock options granted with service conditions represents the average period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding and is based on the expected term calculated using the approach prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission's Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110 for “plain vanilla” options. The Company obtained the risk free interest rate from publicly available data published by the Federal Reserve. The volatility rate was computed based on a comparison of average volatility rates of similar companies. The fair value of the options was determined using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions: risk free interest rate - 0.69% to 0.71%, volatility - 84.40%, expected term - 2.5 years, expected dividends- N/A.

As of June 30, 2014 the weighted average exercise price of all stock options outstanding was $0.002, the remaining contractual life was 4.6 years and there was no intrinsic value.

NOTE 6 - NOTES PAYABLE DUE TO STOCKHOLDERS

On February 11, 2014, the Company issued notes payable with two principal stockholders, each such note in the principal amount of $87.5 with the interest thereon at the rate of 5% per annum. The principal amount and all accrued interest of this Note are due on July 31, 2015 (the “Maturity Date”). Any amounts that remain unpaid until due shall thereafter bear interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum. Interest as aforesaid shall be calculated on the basis of actual number of days elapsed over a year of 360 days. At June 30, 2014 interest expense amounted to approximately $3. Accrued interest as of June 30, 2014 was approximately $3. The notes are secured by all the assets of the Company.

NOTE 7 - BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

The Momspot Acquisition

Pursuant to the terms of a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated July, 2013, the Company acquired a 51% equity interest in Momspot LLC, (“Momspot”) in exchange for the Company’s commitment to contribute up to $165 of working capital to Momspot over a two-year period to fund its business development and operations. Simultaneous with the acquisition the Company became a party to the Momspot Operating Agreement and the manager thereunder. Momspot meets the definition of a “business” in accordance with ASC Topic 805.

MomSpot is a start-up company. Momspot’s goal is to be the premier specialty retail affiliate marketing company targeting women between the ages of 24 and 45 who are either mothers or expecting their first child (“Moms”).

The results for Momspot for the twelve month period ended June 30, 2014 are consolidated in the consolidated financial statements within this document.

The fair value of the purchase consideration was allocated to fair value of the net tangible assets acquired, with the resulting excess allocated to separately identifiable intangibles, and the remainder recorded as goodwill, if any.  

The purchase price was allocated as follows:

Purchase Consideration:
Fair value of Momspot (1)$- 
     
*  Director April 30, 2010
Lawrence BursteinTangible assets acquired  
*  DirectorApril 30, 2010
Robert S. Ellin
*  DirectorApril 30, 2010
Mark Dyne
- 

ATRINSIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

(1)Fair value, which was not material, was based upon the fair value of the cash consideration paid by the Company for the acquisition of Momspot ($0 consideration received) and a discounted cash flow analysis, including the calculation of the present value of the terminal value of cash flows, and supporting analysis that included a comparison of selected financial data of the Company with similar data of other publicly held companies comparable to ours in terms of end markets, operational characteristics, growth prospects and geographical footprint.

The following table presents the unaudited pro-forma financial results, as if the acquisition of Momspot had been completed as of July 1, 2013 and 2012:

 For the year ended June 30, 
 2014 2013 
Revenues$- $- 
Net loss (1,079) (1,027)
Loss per share - basic and diluted$(0.00)$(0.01)

The unaudited pro-forma results of operations are not intended to present actual results that would have been attained had the acquisition been completed as of July 1, 2012 or 2013 or to project potential operating results as of any future date or for any future periods.

NOTE 8 – INCOME TAXES

During both 2014 and 2013, the Company incurred a net loss and therefore had no tax liability. The Company does not have any material uncertain income tax positions. As a result of significant losses and uncertainty of future profit, the net deferred tax asset has been fully reserved. As of June 30, 2014, the valuation allowance decreased by $604 related to decreased federal and state NOL carry forwards. The cumulative net operating loss carryforward is approximately $47.7 million and $47.7 million at June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and will start expiring in the year ended 2029. The Company has not performed a detailed analysis to determine whether an ownership change under Section 382 of the IRC has occurred. The effect of an ownership change would be the imposition of an annual limitation on the use of net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards attributable to periods before the change. Any limitation may result in expiration of a portion of the NOL before utilization.

The tax effects of temporary differences and tax loss carry forwards that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets at June 30, 2014 and 2013 are comprised of the following:

 As of June 30, 
 2014 2013 
Deferred tax asset      
Net operating loss carryovers$21,698 $22,427 
Stock based compensation 125  - 
Total deferred tax assets 21,823  22,427 
Valuation Allowance (21,823) (22,427)
Deferred tax asset, net of allowance$- $- 

The expected tax expense (benefit) based on the U.S. federal statutory rate is reconciled with actual tax expense (benefit) as follows:

 As of June 30, 
 2014 2013 
Statutory federal income tax rate -34.0% -34.0%
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit -11.5% -11.5%
Valuation Allowance 45.5% 45.5%
Income tax provision (benefit) 0.0% 0.0%

ATRINSIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

The income tax provision consists of the following:

 As of June 30,
 2014 2013 
Federal      
Current$- $- 
Deferred 451  (350)
State      
Current -  - 
Deferred 153  (118)
Change in valuation allowance (604) 468 
Income tax provision (benefit)$- $- 

NOTE 9 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In August, 2014, the Company raised gross proceeds, in a debt financing transaction, of $90 from its two principal stockholders, Iroquois and Hudson, and issued secured promissory notes in the principal amount of $45 to each of them. The notes have a maturity date of July 31, 2015 and bear interest at the rate of 5.0% per annum, payable at maturity. The notes are secured by all the assets of the Company.

*  DirectorApril 30, 2010
Jerome Chazen
*  DirectorApril 30, 2010
Stuart GoldfarbF-14

* By:  /s/ Jeffrey Schwartz
 Jeffrey Schwartz
 As Attorney-In-Fact

27


Exhibit
No.Title
31.1Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

28